money and entry due by 7 a.m. tomorrow.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001
02:02 PM ---------------------------
From: Eric Groves/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 08:11 AM
To: Mark Fondren/ENRON@enronXgate, Rajib Saha/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Swinney/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Earnest/ENRON@enronXgate, William E
Kasemervisz/ENRON@enronXgate, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tomas
Tellez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Pennix/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/ENRON@enronXgate, Patrick Stafford/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Massey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin
Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
egroves1111@hotmail.com@SMTP@enronXgate, "John (E-mail)"
<jholland-kdi@cox-internet.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Jen (E-mail)"
<jennifer.battey@corning.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Geoff (E-mail)"
<Geoffrey.McIntyre@Daltile.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Mason Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Spector/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, "Mom (E-mail)"
<cgroves@frostbank.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Simon Thurbin/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Cross/ENRON@enronXgate, Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allen B
Childress/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Loosley/NA/Enron@Enron, Mo Bawa/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brian O'Rourke/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: 2001 Masters Pool

The Azaleas are blooming and the greens are fast. The Masters are here.  More
importantly the Masters pool is back. Sorry for the short notice, but what
would a major be without the pool. Please invite others.$20 each. Fill out in
Excel and return email the saved file (or hardcopy to me 2986b).

PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR NAME ON THE ENTRY FORM.
RULES IN ATTACHED FILE. GOOD LUCK.


I HAVE NOT RECEIVED YOUR DATA FORMS.  I MUST HAVE SOME OF THE INFORMATION ON
THIS FORM IN ORDER TO SCHEDULE THE MOVE.  PLEASE SEND THIS TO ME ASAP.  IF
YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL ME.

Thank you,
Tammy
x36583
---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Davis/HOU/ECT on 03/17/2000 02:37
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tamara Davis                           03/13/2000 10:54 AM

To: Joe Gordon/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amber Hamby/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael
Flanigan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marilyn N Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracee
Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jason R
Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Castiglione/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sean
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imad Tareen/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Brandon Wax/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Data forms

I wanted to welcome you to the Transaction Analysis & Execution - Capital
/CTG group.  Some of you I have met, others I look forward to meeting soon.

Could you please fill out the attached data sheet and return to Sarah Reyna
or myself by noon Wednesday (3/15).  I need to begin preparing for our move
on the 29th floor.  I believe that some of you may have already received this
when you started the group.

If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call at x36583 or
Sarah at x58035.

Thank you,
Tamara Davis
Assistant to Andrea Reed
V.P.  of the Transaction Analysis & Execution - Capital group


Sorry to inform you but Jen Fraser has just cancelled her brown bag for
today.  Don't forget to sign up for next week's with Mike McConnell.  Call me
if you have any questions.

Stacey
30945
---------------------- Forwarded by Stacey Dempsey/HR/Corp/Enron on
11/14/2000 07:58 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Dempsey
11/13/2000 09:01 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: brown bags

I signed you up for Jen Fraser's brown bag.


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/12/2001
10:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Tom Briggs on 07/12/2001 10:43 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

cc:

Subject: Congressman Ose loved your letter to Sen. Dunn


Sorry about the delay,   I believe they are sitting on someone desk right
now.  I am tracking them down.  No problem just usual stacks of paper delays.

	"Bransgrove. Alan" <Alan.Bransgrove@xemkt.com>
	01/15/2001 03:32 PM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Assignment Agreements

Gerald:

I'm still awaiting executed copies of these Assignment agreements.  Please
advise as to the status of obtaining execution.  Is there a problem?

Alan Bransgrove
Manager, Contract Administration
Gas Acquisition & Trading
(303) 308-6172

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 2:28 PM
> To: Alan.Bransgrove@xemkt.com
> Cc: Paul.T.Lucci@enron.com
> Subject: Assignment Agreements
>
> Attached are the executables forms of assignments.  All of your attorney's
> changes were accepted.  Note that the assignment for the Wind River
> Contract No. 124620 is assigned for the period from Jan 1, 2001 to May 31,
> 2001.  The other contract is assigned for Dec. 1, 2000 thru March 31,
> 2001.
> Let me know if you have any questions (713) 853-3512.   Please print three
> executables of each assignment.  Thanks.
>
> (See attached file: Sandia-Enron Assignment (12-13) 124620.doc)(See
> attached file: Sandia-Enron Assignment (12-13) 124389.doc) << File:
> Sandia-Enron Assignment (12-13) 124620.doc >>  << File: Sandia-Enron
> Assignment (12-13) 124389.doc >>


I have a phone number on a post it note on my cabinet, just to the right of
where my computer would be if I was there.  It is a lawyers name (which of
course I can't remember), male, with a 212 or 202 phone number.  It may be
David something or other.  Could you email me that name and number?

Do you know if there is a way for me to save my emails that I have in folders?

Bet the weather is better than this in San Fran.

Kay


Our thanks to those of you who have already responded regarding the Junior
Achievement Job Shadowing program.  If you have already replied, it is not
necessary to do so again, however, there are still a number of you who have
not responded and we look forward to hearing from you.  Please review the
memo below and respond to Nicki Daw or Susan Skarness ASAP.

Your participation is greatly appreciated.  Thank you.

Mark Frevert & Cliff Baxter

________________________________________________________

	Cliff Baxter
	08/22/2000 11:07 AM

Subject: We Need You

Some of you were contacted earlier this year by Cliff Baxter, Enron's
representative on the Junior Achievement Board of Directors, regarding
participation in Enron's Junior Achievement program.  Since so many changes
have occurred within ENA since that time, we are renewing our request and
broadening it to reach more departments.

One of the programs that we wish to support through Junior Achievement is Job
Shadowing.  This program's objectives are to demonstrate why a sound
education, interpersonal skills, and a strong work ethic are needed to
succeed in the work place.  A successful Job Shadowing program requires your
department's commitment and participation.

The Job Shadowing program consists of the following:

 9:00 - 10:30 AM  Welcome, Company Overview, Video, and Tour
 10:30 - 12:00 N  Job Shadow Experience with Enron Employees and/or
Departments
 12:00 - 1:00 PM  Lunch for Students with Mentors and Closing Comments

Enron has agreed to accept 16 high school juniors and seniors on the second
Wednesday of each month from October 2000 through April 2001.  We need your
assistance in hosting students within your department during the 10:30 AM -
12:00 Noon period.   Students may be either paired up one-on-one with
employees or may remain in groups of 2-4.  Employees participating in Job
Shadowing will also be invited to join their students for a quick lunch and
closing comments.  If enough departments participate, it is possible that
each department may only be needed on a quarterly basis.

Although we have identified two individuals to provide the company overview
and tour, we are also accepting additional volunteers in this area.  Please
advise if anyone in your department is interested in assisting.

Please provide the following information to Nicki Daw or Susan Skarness by
August 30, 2000.

 Department Name:

 Job Shadowing Contact Name:

 Number of Students:

 Individual to Assist With Tours:

We appreciate your consideration and participation in promoting Junior
Achievement and Enron.

Cliff Baxter and Mark Frevert


The Federal Reserve is leaving interest rates unchanged.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/

ABCNEWS.com:  Up to the Moment, Up to You (tm)
http://abcnews.go.com
---
You received this mail because you subscribed via ABCNEWS.com. If you would like to stop receiving these mailings, log into our mailcenter at http://login.mailpref.go.com/unsubscribe .

Please do not respond to this mail. Questions or comments can be submitted at
http://abcnews.go.com/service/help/abccontact.html


Attached please find a Word document for the September 26, 2001 Billing &
Accounting Working Group meeting agenda.

Kathy Logan will chair this meeting while attend the NYISO Operating
Committee meeting.

     (See attached file: BAWGagenda0901.doc)

Wes Yeomans
 - BAWGagenda0901.doc


See attached press release
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001 11:19 AM -----

	"Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
	04/18/2001 02:25 PM

		 To: <gfergus@brobeck.com>, <alan.comnes@enron.com>,
<Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<ray.alvarez@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>,
<thane.twiggs@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: In re:  California Power Exchange Corp., 01-70031, et al.

Attached is a news release issued by FERC regarding a decision in the above
matter.  The court has upheld  FERC's approach to remedying the dysfunctional
California electricity market structures.

Nancy Pickover
Legal Assistant
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC   20006-1872
(202) 828-5861
(202) 223-1225 (fax)

 - NR01-20.1


Stan Babiuk re:Florida EB4157


http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
Energy Exchanges Online - Scottsdale - December 4-6
B2B e-commerce has revolutionized commodity trading, the A&D process and
procurement within the energy industry. With heavyweight keynotes and in-depth
panel discussions this is the first event to bring the major energy companies,
net markets, venture capitalists, regulatory bodies, investment banks and
analysts together to thrash out why its not business as usual but business
online.

For more information please visit www.eyeforenergy.com/xonline
*********************************************************************
===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 13, 2000
The New Power Company: Going Green While Stock Price Drops
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

The New Power Company (TNPC, NYSE: NPW), which bills itself as the first
national residential and small business energy provider, announced that
it has signed a Letter of Intent with Community Energy, Inc. to provide
wind-generated energy to customers in the Philadelphia area. Under the
terms of the agreement, TNPC will market wind power supplied by Community
Energy from a site under development in the mountains of northeast
Pennsylvania.
The new wind turbines are scheduled to come online by the end of 2001.

ANALYSIS: This is an interesting development, especially considering that
TNPC is still embroiled in a battle with Green Mountain for a significant
number of customers that TNPC recently secured in a bidding process from
PECO Energy. This could be an attempt on the part of TNPC to appease customers
who might have preferred to be served by Green Mountain. On the other hand,
it could be a shrewd marketing strategy from the energy service company,
founded earlier this year by Enron (along with partners AOL and IBM).

As you may recall, just two weeks ago TNPC announced that it had reached
an agreement with PECO Energy to supply "competitive default service" for
approximately 300,000 of PECO's residential electricity customers who have
not selected a competitive energy service provider. Green Mountain formally
challenged this agreement, arguing that the PECO/TNPC agreement is "not
in the public interest" and that Green Mountain should have been awarded
the right to serve as the default provider for the customers in question.
Thus, it seems curious that TNPC has just now announced the addition of
wind power to its portfolio of services. Up to this point, TNPC has been
working to aggressively acquire customers from other energy providers,
such as the approximately 285,000 natural gas and 20,000 electricity customers
it purchased from Columbia Energy Group. The acquisition of the customers
in PECO's territory was a major coup for TNPC, which is still in start-up
mode. Although TNPC claims that it was fairly awarded the customers from
PECO, the addition of wind power could be seen as an attempt to quell further
objections from Green Mountain or perhaps the beginning of a new identity
as a provider of renewable energy.

Community Energy, the company from whom TNPC is securing the wind power
that it will market, began making wind power available to businesses in
Pennsylvania last year. TNPC customers will be able to buy wind energy
in fixed kilowatt-hours, allowing for more customized service and tailored
use of power. Interestingly, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania just renewed
a contract with Green Mountain in which Green Mountain will supply about
37,500 MW of green power to aggregated state agencies. This indicates that
desire for green power is quite strong in Pennsylvania, and any energy
provider wanting to market in the state would be wise to include green
power in its portfolio. Thus, while renewable energy was not a fundamental
component of TNPC's original business plan, the company appears to be moving
in this direction (at least in states where it is strategic to do so).

However, this announcement comes on the heels of TNPC's announcement of
its third-quarter earnings and a sudden drop in its stock price. TNPC's
revenues for 3Q 2000 were $18.2 million, derived from the sale and delivery
of electricity and natural gas to retail customers in just two states
(Pennsylvania
and New Jersey). Gross profit was $1.3 million, or 7.2 percent of revenues.
Yet, the loss on earnings before income tax (EBIT) was $68.3 million. The
net loss for the quarter was $69.9 million, or $2.96 per basic share. TNPC
reiterates that it is a new company with a very limited operating history.
Therefore, the company contends that its year-over-year comparisons are
not meaningful or indicative of future performance. The company's goal
for 4Q 2000 is to achieve revenues of approximately $60 to $63 million,
with an estimated year-end customer count of 340,000.

Eugene Lockhart, TNPC's CEO, said he was pleased with the 3Q performance.
Lockhart contends that TNPC "achieved both our overall financial performance
targets and business objectives," and referenced the fact that the company
is still building its "systems and architecture" so that it can continue
to penetrate additional competitive markets. In addition, TNPC has raised
approximately $546 million in funding which the company is using primarily
to build its brand identity in this early stage of its operation.

However, despite its positive outlook, after TNPC made its earnings
announcement
its shares took a nosedive, perhaps reflecting uncertainty about the energy
provider's ability to meet its objectives. The shares closed last Friday
at $9, which is a dramatic drop from the average price of $25 before the
3Q earnings announcement. TNPC issued its IPO on Oct. 5, 2000, at a price
of $21 per share, which at the time seemed quite high for a start-up energy
company with a limited track record. A day after its opening, the stock
closed at $27 per share. The stock was received so favorably for two reasons,
in my estimation. First, TNPC has been bankrolled by some hefty investments.
In two separate, private placements, investors such as Enron, GE Capital
Equity Investments and DLJMB Partners (among others) put up about $214
million in start-up capital in exchange for shares in the company. Enron
is the majority owner of TNPC, with 57-percent control. Second, and perhaps
more importantly, earlier this year Enron transferred its residential and
small commercial retail operations in California and Ohio to TNPC. Together
with the Columbia Energy Group acquisition, TNPC has come out of the gate
running with a significant beginning customer base of over 325,000 customers.

Yet clearly investors are now questioning the strength of TNPC stock, and
the company is at a crossroads. In order to keep its momentum on track,
TNPC needs to do two things. First, it needs to acquire additional customers
to expand its base. Key states such as Texas or Ohio offer the best
opportunity
to secure customers since competition is unfolding at a more rapid pace
in those states. Second, as I discussed in my IssueAlert from Nov. 6, 2000,
energy stocks that are based on new technologies in general and alternative
fuels in particular are being received particularly well by investors.
Consequently, it is a very shrewd move for TNPC to suddenly announce that
it will be a provider of wind power. This could potentially send the stock
price on a upward climb again, despite the fact that financial success
of the company is still unproven.

Regarding the customer base expansion, Ohio looks like the next state that
TNPC will target. Just last week, the company filed an application with
the Ohio Public Utility Commission to provide electricity in the state.
Yet, it's clear that TNPC is still fine-tuning its marketing approach.
In Ohio, it is offering customers competitive energy prices, flexible payment
and pricing choices, and frequent flier miles as a marketing incentive,
but there is no mention in TNPC's application that it will provide renewable
energy in Ohio.

Moreover, several questions remain. Does TNPC plan to carve out a new role
for itself as a renewable energy provider, or it just providing wind power
in Pennsylvania to preserve its market edge in the state? Will the addition
of wind power positively benefit the stock price of TNPC? Will TNPC
demonstrate
revenues of $63 million in 4Q 2000? And where will the company's next
acquisition
of customers take place? All of these questions directly impact the future
success of TNPC.
===============================================================

Miss last week? Catch up on the latest in the energy industry at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssuesWatch

==============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 25, 2001 5:00pm through May 29, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001

This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be
connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center
South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network.  While
this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services,
this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities.  No
network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown.  The actual
physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th
floor Data Center.

Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th
2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT).
Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network
testing has completed.

If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at
713-410-0642 for more information.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM:

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/25/2001 at  5:00:00 PM thru Fri 5/25/2001 at  7:00:00 PM
Outage:  Memory replacement for server refraction.
Disruption:  Total Disruption of Service
Environments Impacted:  DPR and EnTelligence
Purpose: To replace a memory module that has repeated error.
Backout: Leave server in current configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Start Date: 12/21/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122106.txt


Carolyn,

I prefer that closing event #4 preceed #3.

Thanks,

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/19/2001 10:05:16 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Salmon Closing Memorandum

 <<30C_01!.DOC>>

Kay:

Enclosed is the initial draft of a closing memorandum for the Salmon
transaction.  Please review and advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 140424v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 30C_01!.DOC


We have been working hard over the past three months to restore normalcy to the non-debtor companies in the EGS family of asset-based businesses.   We are doing our best to operate on a business as usual basis, and continue the regular, consistent programs we previously provided.  That is why earlier this year we paid performance bonuses and merit increases to most non-debtor employees, in the ordinary course of business.

At the same time, I understand that events of the past few months have been disturbing and left many with a sense of uncertainty about their future.  We realize that you need some sort of "safety net" to allow you to be comfortable staying here as we work to reorganize.  With this in mind, I am pleased to inform you that we have put in place a severance plan for U.S. employees of certain non-debtor companies.  We have wanted this program for some time, but even as a non-debtor company we had to work extensively with consultants and creditors in securing its approval.

The severance plan provides that, under most circumstances, terminated employees would be eligible for two weeks of base pay for every full or partial year of service.  In the case of a termination due to reorganization, the minimum compensation would be eight weeks of pay and the maximum would be fifty-two weeks.  The details and restrictions to this plan are explained in the plan summary for your company's plan, which can be found on the ETS HR link on the Enron Transportation Services intranet site under "ETS HR Manuals". It can also be accessed by clicking on the attached weblink:  http://hrweb.enron.com/businessUnits/ets/etsHRmanuals.asp .

I hope this plan will give you a bit more peace of mind and allow you to continue the excellent work you have been providing in our ongoing businesses.  Please contact your HR representative, if you have any questions about the severance plan or related matters.

Stan


All,

The Legal\Credit Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 20th--HAS BEEN CANCELED

The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 4th.

Regards,
Susan S. Bailey
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
phone: (713) 853-4737
fax: (713) 646-3490
email: susan.bailey@ enron.com


I did not see an attachment to this memo from MP.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           11/03/2000 04:51 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Metals NA structure

---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000 04:55
PM ---------------------------

Marcelo Parra@MGUSA
11/03/2000 02:59 PM
To: Tom McKeever/EU/Enron@ENRON, Michael Farmer/EU/Enron@Enron, Michael J
Hutchinson/EU/Enron@Enron, Philip Bacon/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Joe
Robertson/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT, Sam
Hainsworth/EU/Enron@ENRON, Jean Michaud/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Rosenblum/CHI/MGUSA@MGUSA, Bob Uxa/CHI/MGUSA@MGUSA, Mike
Casey/STL/MGUSA@MGUSA, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Naomi Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Louis
Colarusso/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Howard Carter/EU/Enron@ENRON, David P
Tregar/EU/Enron@Enron, Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Tina Ward/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron Metals NA structure

All,

Please find attached what is now the latest and (subject to minor
adjustments), the final version of the future Enron Metals North America
organizational structure.

Effective November 1, the Montreal, Chicago and St Louis office's have been
reconfigured into Agency offices.  I would like to thank all of you for your
support and cooperation during this integration phase.  Clearly more work
needs to be done but the major risk and control issues have been addressed.

Best regards,
Marcelo
Enron Metals & Commodity Corp.
E-Mail: Marcelo.Parra@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
03:52 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
05/09/2000 06:07 PM
To: Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: East Side Prospects: Bammel Compression Options

Greg,

I am short traders this week and Schwieger is out until Thursday afternoon.
Is there any way that we can move this meeting to Friday afternoon.  Jim and
I would like to be involved but we can not make it Wednesday morning.  If the
meeting can not be changed then Ed will go in our behalf.

Thanks,
Tom


please print this plus attachments and file in Garden State file.  Thanks.
MHC

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 11:53
PM ---------------------------

HThomas@gspcorp.com on 11/03/2000 01:48:00 PM
To: david.howe@enron.com, marty.blick@enron.com, michelle.cash@enron.com
cc: david.oxley@enron.com, fran.l.mayes@enron.com
Subject: Use of Enron's name in GSP recruiting

Gentlemen, Michelle Cash in Legal has reviewed the engineering advertisement

that we put together for campus and had the comments below.  Michelle is
concerned about how much we tie Enron into the document.

I revised the document as Michelle suggested, see engradv3.  It does not
have
quite the flow that the preceding document had.

Let's discuss this document next week when we are all in New Jersey.  David,
you
might want to talk to Michelle about the bigger issue of keeping Enron's
name
separate from GSP, her phone number is 853.6401

______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
Subject: Re: campus recruiting
Author:  "Michelle.Cash@enron.com" <SMTP:Michelle.Cash@enron.com> at
RICHMOND
Date:    11/3/00 12:12 PM

I agree with the issue of de-emphasizing Enron in the communications.  I
would suggest that the communication, as written, could be used to imply
that the candidate would be an Enron employee.  If possible, we should say
that GSP is an LLC that currently is owned 100% by Enron, because, as I
understand it, Enron is going to sell down portions of that facility.
Thus, I want to manage the expectations that the person would be an "Enron"
person.

Could you please forward this message?

Thanks.  Michelle

HThomas@gspcorp.com on 11/03/2000 06:22:00 AM

To:   david.oxley@enron.com, michelle.cash@enron.com,
      fran.l.mayes@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  campus recruiting

     David, Michelle, Fran, see the following.  Michelle, once you have
     your discussion with David Howe about the Enron influence, perhaps we
     need to have some writeup that states what we should say and what we
     should not say.

     Hoyt

______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
Subject: campus recruiting
Author:  Hoyt H. Thomas at GARFIELD
Date:    11/3/00 7:17 AM

     Jim Burkhead: Dave (Syracuse) and Marty (Miami Ohio) are both going to
     campus on the 14th.  If you could move your date at Maine up to that
     week from the 29th, then we could convene after all three interview
     trips and decide who we want to bring on-site.

     I propose (based on Marty's suggestion) that we try to bring all our
     leading candidates in for a mill visit on the same day (or perhaps one
     day for Dec grads and one day for May grads, if we get that many
     interested candidates), preferably the last week of November.  It will
     be a busy day, but then we can knock it all out then.

     Regarding your campus visits, we are looking for at least two process
     engineers, December grads are fine (actually preferred at the present
     time), and we should also look at environmental engineers if they are
     available at the school you are visiting.  In order to hire two
     process engineers, we probably have to bring eight in for a mill
     visit.

     Margo, is there any way we can get some GSPCLLC brochures or handouts
     for Jim, Mary and Dave to use on campus?

FYI, Houston Legal is recommending that we do not emphasize the Enron
connection.  I think that we are probably okay with the reference to Enron
in
the attached blurb that Marty and Dave put together (attached) but let's
avoid
suggesting to candidates that they can hire on here and then move into
Enron.
Jim and Marty, when you send the attached doc to campus, you might want to
add
your name at the bottom in addition to Dave's to make sure that the
students

know that they can contact you.

David Howe and Mike Parker, do you want to go to any of these campus
visits?

Thanks, Hoyt

______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
Subject: Re[2]: Process Engineer
Author:  David Freeswick at GARFIELD
Date:    11/3/00 12:31 AM

     Hoyt;

     I'm scheduled at Syracuse Nov 14.

     Dave

______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Process Engineer
Author:  Hoyt H. Thomas at GARFIELD
Date:    11/1/00 7:29 PM

     Dave, do you have a date set up?  Let's talk.  go ahead and send it to
     Syracuse.

     Jim Burkhead is working on Maine, i have to call Rutgers and NJIT.
     But I would really like to find 2 Dec grads from the paper schools if
     we could.

     Hoyt

______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Process Engineer
Author:  David Freeswick at GARFIELD
Date:    10/30/00 4:05 PM

     I believe the attached document is the final version for the process
     engineering position. Please review it. If it looks OK I would like to
     send it off to Syracuse to be posted in the Pulp and Paper Science
     Department. I will schedule a recruiting trip there in November.

     Is anyone going to Maine or Rutgers/NJIT?

     Dave

(See attached file: engradv2.doc)
(See attached file: Forward.txt)

 - ENGRADV2.DOC
 - FORWARD.TXT
 - engradv3.doc
 - Forward.txt


Attorney-Client Protected

Kevin, If we respond to the RFP with what we believe to be market prices and
values and they don't accept it - does that not support a case where damages
from the MOPA , for that 500 MW, can be defined to be equal to or lower than
our submission.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000
09:31 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           08/31/2000 09:08 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: TVA Issued RFP for peaking power

Attorney-Client Protected

No, I don't think so.  TVA wants a two year PPA with 100% control, including
AGC and hourly dispatch.  We would have to price the capacity and energy
product they are asking for extremely high, and we run the risk of increasing
our LD exposure in the pending litigation.

If Elizabeth thinks we can use the RFP to help our legal case, I would
certainly support a response that helps our overall ecomomic position.


Get ready, here it comes!  Actually, you have a little time to mentally
prepare yourselves.

July 20 - We'll receive the worksheet file from the financial group.

August 6 - Worksheets are due to me, and internal budget review meetings will
take place during this week.

August 13 - I'll submit the worksheets back to the financial group.

August 20 - 31 - Corporate holds budget review meetings.  Any
changes/adjustments to submitted budgets will begin.

September 14 - Finance will distribute preliminary allocations to business
units.

Please call me if you have any questions,
Elizabeth


EFCU Hosts Student Loan Workshop

If there is a student in your household who is preparing for college, you
don't want to miss Enron Federal Credit Union's 2001 Student Loan Workshop.
Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation (TGSLC) Representative, Cynthia
Mayberry, will be on hand to explain the student loan process, the best time
to apply for a student loan, how to get as much money as possible, answer
questions, and more. Join us:

Friday, February 9
11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
Enron Building - 5C2
Refreshments will be served.

 Reserve your seat by sending an e-mail to kim.foley@enron.com.


Mr. Skilling-

Here are a few questions I would like to submit before your floor meeting on
the 32nd floor  Wednesday.

1.)  Enron seems to be taking a new approach to their business by taking
assets off the books and looking for new opportunities as a market maker in
new markets.  Is Enron going to be just a trading company?

2.)  If Enron is just a trading company our earnings could be quite
volatile.  How could this affect our stock price?  Will Wall Street be
prepared to accept more volatile earnings?

3.)  Volume on EOL seems to be decreasing since the middle of the year and
new platforms are being introduced into the market place.  Is this going to
have a negative effect on Enron's stock price?

4.) What are some of the new markets Enron plans to explore in the near
future?

5.)  Is Broadband coming along as quickly as Wall St. expects and how much of
our stock price is based on broadband?

I hope these questions are in line with some of the issues you wish to
discuss and I look foward to hearing you speak tomorrow.

Sincerely,

Matt Lenhart


No big deal.  I'm just trying to tie up loose ends when I can.  I suspect
they must have gotten paid, or else someone would be complaining.


FYI.  Here are letters Enron (Steve Kean) sent to US Senators about real
solutions for California.  The Feinstein / Murkowski letters are very good
overviews of our recommendations on what to do and what not to do.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 07:57 AM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	02/26/2001 05:27 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Letters to Senators

Attached are the letters sent to Senators Wyden, Feinstein & Murkowski.


Hey,
I just wanted to make sure you knew to use the new form - unilateral
confidentiality agreement.  Also, that we wanted to try and get it out to AES
either later today or early Monday.  Thanks again for your help.
Ben


I will leave steve's situation for him to describe.  Needless to say as far
as I am concerned he wasn't leaving with anybody but me.

I ran into your dad at the post office last night.  He was standing next to
the mail slot crying.  It would be nice to live in Denver, just have to find
a good job so that I can afford housing.
PL


the feeling is quite mutual.

best,
jeff

	Donald Lassere@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	11/10/2000 12:08 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Jeff,

Thank you - it's been great working with you! You are definitely one the most
intelligent, hardest working individuals I have had the pleasure of working
with.

Kindest regards,

Donald

	Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	11/10/00 10:53 AM

		 To: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Just talked to Sue re: yesterday's meeting and before I shoot myself in the
head, I just wanted to say it's been great working with  you guys.
Unbelievable....   In any case, congratulations.  Sounds like, all in all, it
was a good meeting.

Scott:  has Oregon figured out who they voted for yet?


AGA for 7/7/00 is 97


Start Date: 4/12/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041209.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/12/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred:   2.25 / Final:   1.27)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/12/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


One other thought regarding confidentiality:

In view of our argument for transparency, assuming full tranparency in the
distribution system planning process, the utility may also have information
provided by retail customers that may also be confidential for the same
reasons given below.  We certainly would not want the utilities to be
permitted to not have to provide that info to us, but I would assume we would
honor the confidentiality of that info in the same manner we are asking the
utilities.  Does this make  Any comments.
(I bring this up only to the extent that on the settlement conference call
the other day the woman from PG&E mentioned confidentiality of info in
passing comment regarding transparency).  Any other thoughts?

---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Hoatson/HOU/EES on 04/20/2000 03:43
PM ---------------------------

Tom Hoatson
04/20/2000 03:20 PM
To: Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Siting Committee Hearing - Interconnection Rules

I will most likely not be able to attend.  However, my comment relating to
this issue was a generalization of confidentiality clauses I've used on other
interconnect agreements and other contracts, including the "model"
interconnection agreement recently submitted to FERC by EPSA.  In essence,
the issue is that the utility should not have the unilateral right to
disclose any information to anyone they want that is sent to them in
connection with a DG interconnection.  This would include ownership, facility
output, markets for energy or capacity or ancillary sevices (if any) and
maintenance schedules (these schedules may be coincident with a retail
customer's facility maintenance schedule which itself may be confidential
information between the generator and retail customer).  This information is
potentially competitive and should be held confidential.  Potential wording
for a simplified confidentiality section would be as follows:

"Unless compelled to disclose by judicial or administrative process or other
provisions of law or as otherwise provided for in this Rule, the Electic
Provider shall hold in confidence any and all documents and information
furnished by the Electric Customer in connection with the interconnection,
provide however, that to the extent it is necessary for the the EP to release
or disclose such information to a third party in order to perform the EP's
obligation herein, EP shall advise said third party of the confidential
provisons of this Rule and use its best efforts to require said third party
to agree in writing to comply with such provisions."

Bruno Gaillard
04/20/2000 11:47 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Tom Hoatson/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Frank/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Siting Committee Hearing - Interconnection Rules

Scott Tomashefsky is asking me to present our position on the confidentiality
clause in Rule 21 at the CEC Hearing on 4/25. Any thoughts. I hope to be able
to respond to him today.

Should an Enron rep be present to do so? Me or another?
Bob are you coming to Sacramento?

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 04/20/2000
09:41 AM ---------------------------

"Scott Tomashefsky" <Stomashe@energy.state.ca.us> on 04/20/2000 07:26:24 AM
To: bgaillar@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Siting Committee Hearing

Bruno,

I was wondering if you would be willing to speak for 5-10 minutes on Tuesday
regarding Section 2.7 of the proposed Rule 21 language (confidentiality of
information)?  I was hoping you could convey your concerns for the Committee.
We have also added language in the report stating the Energy Commission has
previously urged positions similar to Enron's at the CPUC, but the CPUC has
not accepted them.

Please let me know at your earliest convenience.

Scott


I would like to attend the event with Secretary Summers.


Judy,  Attached is the draft confirm for EEX.  Can you fill in all the notice information for EEX.  Also as we discussed, we also need to insert the well/field/lease data.  Note that there is no MDQ.  From the printout, it looked as though all volumes in excess of 1700 MMBtu per day were priced as gas daily.  If there is an MDQ, we will need to insert it.  Thanks.


Mark please see attached agreement
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000 09:38 AM
---------------------------
From: David Mims@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 09/05/2000 11:25 AM
To: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pilot Program Subscriber Agreement

Andy and Bob-

 Please see the attached draft of the subscriber agreement.  Legal is making
some minor modifications to the agreement (typos, etc.), but I wanted you to
have the opportunity to review the agreement in the meantime.

 You will notice that it is a binding agreement between EBS and the
Counterparties.  What EBS askes the counterparties to commit is essentially
that they will support the connection and router that they own in accordance
with the way that we have engineered the service, and that if they make
changes to their network, they will advise us so that we can evaluate the
need for any modifications to the setup.  Since we are obligated to provide a
minimum level of service and a redundant service to the best of our ability,
we have to get some commitment from the counterparties in this regard to
ensure performance.  The agreement furthermore specifies an interconnection
order with facility authorization for EBS or its designate to install
circuits.  The counterparty technical contact should be expecting this
language.

 Meanwhile, we have ordered circuits as we have discussed and are moving down
the list of counterparties that have indicated a desire to participate to
determine customer-specific network configurations.  Felix Perez is the
Network Engineer contacting the counterparties (indeed, due to his background
in Houston, he knows a lot of the technical contacts!), and we also have a
Sales Engineer supporting this effort.  As Felix determines the requirements,
he generates configuration specifications and diagrams, if necessary, which
are sent to the counterparty.

 Please let me know your comments on the agreement, if any.

Thanks,

David Mims


Additional information:   For the next week the 1.5 project priorities for
the System Performance Group are:
1)  Load up most recent  Mon files for April at site indicated in attached
spreadsheet.
2)  Load backlogged minana and statdat files for Clear Sky and Trent in order
to close gaps.   A customer wants us to conduct an analysis in the near
future with this data.   Mark Fisher says that he gave you graphs which
highlights gaps in the STAR 10 min data.   Is that adequate?
3)  All other data.

Mark V Walker
04/15/2002 07:46 AM
To: Patricia Hunter/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Rabi Sahoo/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, John M Ruiz/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Visupro Upload Status Spreadsheet

To expedite the use of this spreadsheet I onlyl show the most recent (April)
files.   Late March  files will be added in future releases of this
spreadsheet.


Let's keep the date.  This way the bi-lateral obligations between the parties
are concurrent.  Thanks.

	Eva Neufeld@ENRON
	08/04/2000 04:11 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: NB Confid. Agreement

Gerald,
 Did you want to keep the April 19 date? Jerry Peters left the office so I'll
get this to you Monday a.m.  Let me know if you want me to change the date.
Thanks again.
  Eva


hey nicki-

i got back yesterday and am back at work, although i hesitate to call it that.  i had a good time back home, went thru my normal roller coaster of loving being back with my family, then feeling like i am going crazy and needing to leave the house for extended periods of time and then back to loving hanging out there.  caught up with lots of friends and in general did very little for 2 weeks, which felt ok.  it's been awhile since i've been away from my normal life for that long and it was refreshing.  it feels good to be back, too.

i hope you had a relaxing break and are feeling productive again.

cooper

p.s. my sister-in-law really liked her sweater and it fit perfectly.


rajib:
The following are my bids for the asian option:
GQ 1 : .41
GQ 2 : .63
GQ 3 : .57


Anne,

Thanks. I shall be leaving early on Thursday  for California: my family
is moving back to Houston.

I shall ask Vacant to attend.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Labbe, Anne
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:08 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	ESL/ PRC training

Vince,

On Thursday at 3:00, Scott Sawyer of U of H is coming to talk to Marty Chrishman and myself about ESL (English as a second language) training for different groups.  If you would like to attend, please just let me know.

Additionally, we are offering PRC training for managers so that they can give reviews more effectively.  I know that your group could also benefit from this, and am just wondering what day and time is more convenient for your team.

Thanks,
Anne


Kate

Just checking the status of Deal 506239.01 from Friday   Crandall deal
Enron Buys Dynegy
Mid C
1/29 only
25 mws   bloomberg has 390.00   Enron has $290.00

Thanks
Stephanie


There is nothing in my inbox.  I have no form to sign.  Could you deliver me one please?

-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Michelle
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:47 AM
To: Afseth, Stacy; Clark, Chad; Bowen, Todd; Davies, Derek; Dawes, Cheryl; Dupuy, Mark; Garcia, Sebastien; Hrap, Gerry; Keohane, Peter; Lambie, Chris; Laporte, Nicole; Messenger, John P.; Patterson, Grant; Rogers, Glenn; Rondeau, Clayton; Sangwine, Howard; Seminuk, Tyler; Unger, Chris; Vallejo, Stacey; Vander velde, Nikole; Watt, Ryan; Zufferli, John; Assaf, Lisa; Borg, Jeff; Burnham, Steven; Del Moral, Joseph; Devries, Paul; Dorland, Dan; Hanley, JB; Loy, Brian; Stuchbury, Neil; Wilson, Jan; Ellis, Dave; Sangermano, Nick; Dion, Nicole; Giampa, Micheline; Pizzuto, Grace; Toy, Shirley; Bingham, Carey; Butt, Sarah; Flaman, Derek; Hoogendoorn, Frank; Poffenroth, Lori; Tiberi, Fino
Cc: McCulloch, Angela; Hall, Juliana
Subject: Critical Illness

If you are reading this message, you owe me a form.

Critical Illness policies have been distributed for a week and a half.  There is a Premium Notice & Authorization form in each Critical Illness package.  Please sign and return to me immediately to ensure your coverage is not delayed.  All forms need to be sent to me by October 29th, 2001.

Thanks,

 Michelle Wells

Payroll & Benefits

Phone: (403) 974-6977
Fax: (403) 974-6985
michelle.wells@enron.com


Enron North America and Enron Canada are still providing IT and Back Office Services to several parties.  Beth has expressed some concerns about the estate's ability to be able to support  a production trading environment once a split of applications and hardware is made between NETCO and the estate.  Given this we need to make some decisions as to how to best handle these services agreements.  Here are some suggestions:

Peggy Hedstrom, in Calgary would like to assign the Enron Canada Master Services agreements to NETCO and continue to service those via that entity.

Bridgeline, which is a JV in which ENA owns a 40% interest, currently has no way that they can support themselves.  They are totally dependent on Enron for everything from email, internet, network services and office applications as well as trading, risk and back office applications.  If there are concerns about the estate's ability to support Bridgeline then it may be in Enron's best interest to assign this agreement to NETCO.

AEP/HPL is more of a stand alone operation.  They have their own infrastructure in place and currently provide for their own email and office support services.  They have also brought up with their own version of our SCADA system and are in the process of trying to bring up their own version of our Pipeline Operations system.  If we sell them our version of PGAS to support their measurement operations they will then try to tie these applications into their own Trade Blotter, Open Link Financials and Altra.  Their goal was to try and have all of this in place by sometime in June of this year.  Given all of the Commercial conflicts with AEP regarding the sale of HPL it may make the most sense to leave this agreement with the estate and suggest that AEP try to be stand alone ASAP.  That way if the estate defaults on the service agreement then they can at least manually rekey information from one system to another until they have put in their own integration between the applications listed above.

Please let me know if you have any comments or if it makes sense to put together a meeting to discuss the issues of Service Agreements.

Tommy J Yanowski
Sr. Director - Enron Net Works
Work # 713.853.6858
Cell # 713.539.7094

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlman, Beth
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:54 PM
To:	Johnson, Jeff; Stock, Steve; McAuliffe, Bob
Cc:	Webb, Jay; Yanowski, Tommy J.; Burchfield, Richard
Subject:	RE: Integration Test Planning / Coordination Mtg Summary

The AEP and Bridgeline deals must be investigated.  There is no way the estate can support a production environment.  I will be reviewing the contracts to determine our obligations and possible alternatives.

Beth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:23 PM
To:	Stock, Steve; McAuliffe, Bob; Greig, Iain; Nommensen, Dave; Ward, Bob; Sanvido, Terry; Wei, Zhiyong; Nat, Steve; Harmon, Kenneth M.; Warner, John; Saleem, Aftab; Smith, Regan M.; Hillier, Bob
Cc:	Webb, Jay; Perlman, Beth
Subject:	Integration Test Planning / Coordination Mtg Summary

Key Planning Assumptions
1) Jan 20 go live
2) New Co Conversions must be completed and tested by application teams by Jan 15. This assumes all major production data setup - users, rights, books, global data - is completed and tested on a per application basis. Some code changes may still be in process but integration testing can begin to ensure the applications still talk to each other.
3) Integration test planning focus will be to run representative transactions from EOL to SAP through all core trading applications to ensure that applications and interfaces still work. We will not be testing functional permutations, data conditions, validation or exceptions to any significant degree.
4) Each application conversion team must test their changes before approving their changes for integration testing. We are operating from the premise that data, infrastructure and code changes have been tested at a application system level before the enterprise integration test starts.
4) All systems will be physically split (even Unify at this point).
5) Integration test team will develop and execute the test plan for both Estate and New Co.
6) We will integrate key business reps into the process for planning and execution and they will have shared responsibility for signoff on the test to support go live to production.
7) We will minimize the differentiation between New Co and Estate for conversion and test team purposes. There are two teams - Conversion and Integration Test. Each team will focus on both Estate and New Co. Resources are too tight and the process is too inefficient to separate responsibility.
8) Estate conversions must happen at the application level before New Co conversion work can begin in earnest. Estate conversion is on the critical path for New Co.

Key Issues
1) We will push to get a decision to see if we can focus on financial trading first, then physical. If financial is the focus, delivery risk goes down dramatically. For now, we must plan on the worst case -- physical and financial on Jan 20.
2) We need both a dev and a test environment for all systems that support AEP and Bridgeline in Estate. This means that we need a dev environment (and HW gap addressed) for Unify, Sitara, CPR, TAGG/ERMS. Conversion teams need to coordinate with infrastructure immediately on this issue to make sure we're in synch.
3) Unify servers probably can't be owned by New Co while running a single license of Unify.
4) Some systems are using 'short name' instead of Duns ID as a key for counterparties from Global. The Global, TAGG / ERMS, Unify and SAP reps must quickly define the best approach for making global data changes and minimizing hard coded reference id risks.
5) We must clearly define limits of conversion and test scope to hit these potential dates. We must focus on core systems with only core changes required to support day one trading.
6) We can only convert Estate over the weekend due to AEP / Bridgeline considerations. The time window will be very small.

Core Conversion Team
1) Steve Stock - Applications
2) Bob McAuliffe - Infrastructure
3) Ziyong Wei
4) Steve Nat
5) Dave Nommensen
6) Ken Harmon
7) John Warner
8) Bob Ward
....

Core Integration Test Team
1) Jeff Johnson
2) Iain Greig
3) Aftab Saleem
4) Terry Sanvido
5) Regan Smith

Program Coordination
1) Jane Henry
2) Steve Simpson

Next Steps For Integration Test Team
1) Due 12/20. Define integration test approach and id test script and expected results templates. Owner: Aftab Saleem / Regan Smith
2) Due Jan 3. Application system flow diagram at appropriate granularity for communicating flow on integration test for core systems. Owner: Terry Sanvido / Steve Simpson
3) Due 12/20. Identify list of core systems for test purposes. Identify key IT owner and key business owner and respresentative for integration test. Owner: Iain Greig.
4) Due 12/21. Define integration test workplan for integration test planning and execution for both Estate and New Co. Owner: Jeff Johnson
5) Ongoing. Participation in daily program management coordination meeting at 8:30. Owners: Jeff Johnson, Iain Greig, Aftab Saleem.
6) Due 12/21. Organize meeting with key users and IT contacts to communciate foundation assumptions, context, team and approach for integration test. Develop first cut at sample trade transaction set. Owner: Iain Greig / Aftab Saleem.
7) Completed. Contact Bob Hall, Leslie Reeves, Bob Superty, Brice Baxter to communicate above and set up meeting to begin planning with them on the integration testing process. Owner: Jeff Johnson
8) Due 12/21.  Refine core system list with IT owners and Business owners for integration test purposes. Owner: Iain Greig.
9) Due 12/20. Set up Integration Test folder on O drive under Infotech / Development Support.  Owner: Aftab Saleem.

Let me know if you have questions or changes. I am out tomorrow but I'm back on Friday.

Thanks.


Real-Timers,

Harbor Cogen has been prescheduled for Thursday, 8/9, 80mw, HE7-22.  There are a few things that needs to be done in real-time:

1.	We would like to try to buy-back the first few hours for something under $67.50 (what they sold for day-ahead.  We'll use their day-ahead price rather than their generation costs because we sold day-ahead for slightly below their generation costs of $69.50 in order to make money with this buy-back strategy and selling 15mw from the steam turbine in real-time).  So, please try to buy-back, HE7-10 (or through HE11 if prices warrant), 80mw, SP15.  Treat this like the Delano buy-back, where we split the profit with the customer.  Please stay in contact with the control room to communicate which hour they are supposed to come up for.

2.	We need to sell 15mw from the steam turbine in real-time.  The steam turbine can only be started up 3 hours after the gas turbine is fired up.  On the back end, it can shut down the same hour that the gas turbine shuts down.  So, please sell 15mw, SP15, beginning 3 hours after the gas turbine comes on.  For example, if you bring the gas turbine on beginning HE11, please begin selling the steam turbine HE14 through HE22.

If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call.

Thanks a bunch,
Stan


There were some modifications to the LFT form I sent earlier.   This was re-posted 2/2/01


Attached are the notes from this weekend.


how much

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:57 PM
To:	Stubblefield, Wade; Black, Don
Subject:	RE: Collateral

May need to post TX PUC collateral.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stubblefield, Wade
Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:53 AM
To:	Black, Don; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Collateral

It is my understanding, as much as anyone knows it today, that between now and January 2, 2002, we do not have to post any collateral or other payments (other than payment for commodity) to keep contracts we want to keep alive.

Dan and Janet are meeing with McMahon today at 2:00 to discuss our overall strategy.  Can you confirm back to me the above comment.

Thanks

Wade


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000 04:29 PM -----

	Zaib Iqtidar <zaib@ecogas.com>
	08/18/2000 04:03 PM

		 To: "'richard.b.sanders@enron.com'" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ecogas Legal Expenses 8/17/00

Please find attached the most recent schedule of outstanding legal expenses
for Ecogas Corporation. This schedule was compiled with information
available as of 8/17/00. Please call 512-347-1441 ext 278 if you have any
questions.

Regards,

Zaib Iqtidar

 <<Ecogas Legal Bills  8-17-00.xls>>

 - Ecogas Legal Bills  8-17-00.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron on
08/24/2000 09:01 AM ---------------------------

Lorraine Lindberg
08/22/2000 10:25 AM
To: emeaders@redcedargathering.com
cc:

Subject: Revised Transportation Proposal

Hi Ed - Here is a revised comprehensive summary of the firm transportation
proposal between Red Cedar and Transwestern:

Term:  5 years, January 1, 2001through December 31, 2005

Year	Volume	Rate(+option fee)
1	125,000 MMBtu/d*	$0.02/MMbtu/d
2	150,000 MMBtu/d	$0.025/MMBtu/d
3	150,000 MMBtu/d	$0.03/MMBtu/d
4	150,000 MMBtu/d	$0.035/MMBtu/d
5	150,000 MMBtu/d	$0.04/MMBtu/d

Option:  Red Cedar shall have a one-time option to reduce its contract MDQ
for contract years 4 - 5 to a volume between 100,000 MMBtu/d - 150,000
MMBtu/d.  Red Cedar may trigger this option anytime before November 30,
2003.  Option fee is an incremental one-tenth of one cent/MMBtu (additive to
the above quoted rates) over the five year term.

Facility Modifications:  The current cost estimate to increase the meter
capacity (from 200,000 MMBtu/d to 300,000 MMBtu/d) at the Arkansas Loop Plant
into Transwestern is $378,000.  * Year 1 capacity of 125,000 MMBtu is
dependent upon the completion of these facility modifications.  Red Cedar
will fund these facility modifications (by a one-time payment of $378,000
payable prior to Transwestern ordering material for the modifications).  In
order to avoid the tax gross-up of approximately $130,000, the $378,000 will
be amortized over the term of the contract and booked as "pre-paid"
transportation fees.  (The net effect of this will be zero because the slight
increase/MMBtu which will show up on the monthly transportation invoice will
be negated by the corresponding credit for the pre-paid transportation.)

Please call me to discuss.  Thanks.

Lorraine


---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Nguyen/Corp/Enron on 12/22/99
01:13 PM ---------------------------

Larry Lenning <larry@apbenergy.com> on 12/22/99 12:04:06 PM
To: Jennifer Nguyen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: Interesting Billboards

----------
From:  Aiysha Billings
Sent:  Wednesday, December 22, 1999 12:29 PM
To:  Amber Walker; Amy McClure; Andy Weingarten; Angela Lane; Aubrey
Lipscomb; Beth Hinkebein; Bill Fuller; Bill Kerr; Bo Popovic; Bob Olver;
Brad Florer; Brad Hellman; Brian Hovekamp; Bridget Byrne; Chad Heilig;
Charles Hopmann; Chris Bohnert; Chris Brown; Chris Donohue; Chris Edmonds;
Chris Waits; Chris Williams; Chuck Tanner; Craig Waits; Curtis Edmonds;
Dale Welch; Dan Wolf; David Kern; David Neal; Dennis Crum; Ed Pierangelino;
Elliot Sorkin; Erin Glassford; Erin Higgins; Erin Massey; Felicia Harper;
Frank Frigo; Goddard Hampton; Greg Crum; Greg Holtgrave; Henry Gordinier;
Inna Gurevich; Jack Lamon; James Mueller; Jay Gorman; Jeff Greenwood; Jeff
Knott; Jennifer Jenkins; Jody Clark; Joe Hale; John Davis; John Karlen;
John Perdew; Jonathan Lindsey; Julie Hawley; Justin Horn; Kathy Arnold; Ken
Donaldson; Kevin Gambill; Kim Bush; Kristin Dornbush; Kyle Galloway; Lance
Hickox; Lance McGarvey; Larry Lenning; Leeann Wood; Loren Miller; Mark
Brizendine; Martin McKinney; Matthew Keck; Melissa Davis; Michael
Gustafson; Michelle Green; Mickey Tarullo; Mike Kamber; Mike Lewis; Missy
Colvin; Paul Barr; Paul Lutz; Paul Zinner; Peggy Hickey; Peter Hawkins;
Phil Evans; Preston Higgins; Richard Johnson; Rob Duncan; Rodger McAlister;
Russell Kennedy; Ryan Mitcham; Scott Karr; Scott Tanner; Scott Thompson;
Sean O'Leary; Shannon Hellman; Shawn Ridge; Steve Hulsman; Tarreck Yennes;
Teresa Hwang; Tim Osting; Tim Peters; Tim Ratliff; Tod Vaught; Todd Creek;
Todd Mercer; Tony Christensen; Tony Tong; Travis Powers; Trevor Atkins;
Will Vaughn; Xiujing Zhang
Subject:  FW: Interesting Billboards

----------
From:  Tracy Reecer[SMTP:TracyR@thorntonoil.com]
Sent:  Wednesday, December 22, 1999 9:17 AM
To:  Julie Kurtz; Lisa Daniszewski; 'mdpower@powercreative.com';
'maepaine@ntr.net'; 'aiysha@apbenergy.com';
'Crystal.Settles@mail.state.ky.us'
Subject:  FW: Interesting Billboards

-----Original Message-----
From: Clem Melissa [mailto:Melissa.Clem@Columbia.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 8:55 AM
To: 'tracyr@thorntonoil.com'; 'boonect@mcsmotion.com';
'jdub3144@cs.com'; 'lvl1kac@air.ups.com'; Payne Becky; Huffman Patty;
Garlic Tracy; Hassman, Tara; Schell Tressa; Kitten Jason; Miller Greg
Subject: Interesting Billboards

 > <<BILLBOAR.JPG>>  <<BILLJPG_.JPG>>
  <<RIGHTS.JPG>>  <<LIQUID.JPG>>  <<GOD.JPG>>  <<FLIP.JPG>>
<<BILLBOAR.JPG>>  <<BILLJPG_.JPG>>

 - ATT00000.html
 - RIGHTS.JPG
 - LIQUID.JPG
 - GOD.JPG
 - FLIP.JPG
 - BILLBOAR.JPG
 - BILLJPG_.JPG


Whalley wants you ASAP.  So far, Dilg, Schwartz and Astin are at my desk.  Lay wants to have a meeting with Steve Kean about the press release during your 8:30 meeting.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/30/2000
09:43 AM ---------------------------

"Angeles, Zenee G. - TPZGA" <ZAngeles@sempra.com> on 11/29/2000 04:34:14 PM
To: "Alexander, Michael@sce" <alexanms@sce.com>, "Amirault, Paul@AEC"
<paulamirault@aec.ca>, "Bayless, David@Utility" <david.bayless@utility.com>,
"Beach, Thomas@Crossborder" <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>, "Burkholder,
John@cts/whb" <burkee@cts.com>, "Chancellor, Craig@Calpine"
<craigc@calpine.com>, "Counihan, Rick@Green Mountain"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Dasovich, Jeff@Enron"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Day, Michael@GMSSR" <mday@gmssr.com>, "Dingwall,
Brian@UEM" <bdingwall@unitedgas.com>, "Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw"
<eke@aelaw.com>, "Johnson, Pamela@REMAC" <johnson_pamela@lacoe.edu>, "Jun,
Christine@aelaw" <chj@aelaw.com>, "Karp, Joseph@Whitecase"
<karpjos@sf.whitecase.com>, "Keeler, Paul@BR" <pkeeler@br-inc.com>, "Leslie,
John@Luce" <jleslie@luce.com>, "McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
"Paul, Joe@Dynegy" <6266273191@messaging.sprintpcs.com>, "Pocta, Mark@ORA"
<rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Porter, Doug@SCE" <porterdk@sce.com>, "Rochman,
Michael@CUB" <rochmanm@cubjpa.org>, "Rochman, Michael@SPURR"
<rochmanm@spurr.org>, "Scott, Susan@TW" <sscott3@enron.com>, "Worster,
Gerard@TXU" <gworster@txuenergy.com>, "Zaiontz, Jean@BP" <zaiontj@bp.com>
cc: "Suwara, J.- TPJUS" <JSuwara@sempra.com>, "Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW"
<GWright@sempra.com>, "Sullivan, Glen J." <GSullivan@sempra.com>

Subject: GIR PD

The GIR meeting to discuss the proposed decision issued on November 21 is
scheduled for Monday, December 4, in Room 2A of The Gas Company Tower at 555
West Fifth Street, in Los Angeles.

The following is the Conference Line information for those who are unable to
attend in person:

??????? Dial In No. 1-877-676-6548
??????? Confirmation code 4455426 (please follow prompts)

Parking validations at the GCT building will be available and lunch is
provided.

To assist us in planning, please RSVP to Zenee Angeles via e-mail
(zangeles@sempra.com) or via phone (213/244-3831) on your attendance.

Thank you.


Bill as per your request, presented below is a status of the air permitting
activity by the agencies as of today 11/01/01.

Stations 1 and 2. The EPA has completed is review of these state permits and
has sent them back to the ADEQ for comment.  I have spoken to Shudeish, the
permit engineer for the ADEQ, and he is reviewing EPA's comments as this e
mail is being written.  He will give me a call when his review is complete,
but he does not anticipate any major issues which cant be resolved prior to
the public hearing.  These permits went out for public notice on October 15
and 16, which means that the comment period ends on Nov. 15 and 16.  The ADEQ
plans on holding the public hearing for both permits on monday Nov. 19 in
Williams AZ. at 7:00 pm.  I plan on being there.  Williams is located approx.
30 miles west of Flagstaff, AZ.  The address for the hearing is the Council
Chambers located at 113 south 1st street.  So far, there have been no
responses submitted to the ADEQ by the public.  In EPA's review process,
they  had a problem with methodology proposed by Transwestern for measuring
sulfur in the fuel gas.  We had proposed stain tubes in the custom fuel
monitoring schedule, they wanted us to do wet chemistry.  We convinced them
otherwise (Byron, because of this, you wont need to order a sulfur analyzer
for the Needles facility.  This should save you about $40K).  There was also
an issue with manufacturers quarantees regarding particulate matter emissions
from the turbine and catepillar.  This has been resolved also.

Stations 3 and 4.  I received a call from Roger Kohn, the permit engineer for
the EPA.  He is satisified with the permit application contents and has also
approved stain tubes for the sulfur measurement at these locations.  There
are no outstanding issues on these permits from the EPA.  The public comment
period for the Station 3 and 4 permits ends Nov.  3.  After this date, it
will take 1-2 weeks for the Regional Administrator of the EPA to sign off on
the permits  and then he will have them issued to Transwestern.  As of this
date, there have been no comments submitted to the EPA for the permits for
station 3 and or 4.

Ill keep everyone apprised of future events.


I'm sorry you won't be able to make it to the meeting on the 9th, however I wanted to pass on the attached invitation in the event that your travel plans do change.

In conjunction with the PNW Gas Electric Integration Group meeting on November 9, Calpine would like to invite each of you to the open house of their new Portland office in the Fox Tower.  The open house will be held on November 8 from 3:00 - 6:00 p.m. (see attached invitation for details).  If you have any questions please call Jodi Lietz at 503-552-3785.   RSVP's should also be made to Jodi.

Take care and I hope to see you at the next meeting in early 2002.  Pat

_____________________________________________________________
Visit http://www.freeservers.com to get a Web site with a personalized domain and Web-based email
 - Open House Announcement.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 07:34
AM ---------------------------

"Germany, Mary/COR" <mgermany@CH2M.com> on 10/09/2000 06:12:20 PM
To: "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Pictures

> I can't figure out how to make them smaller!
>
>
>  <<100-0007_IMG.JPG>>
>
>
>
>

 - 100-0007_IMG.JPG


Michael's and my e-mails crossed.  Rod, please follow his procedures on
costs.  Thanks.


Enron in Action can be accessed through the new Community Relations web site at http://cr.enron.com/eia.html .  In this week's issue you will find out information regarding:

Enron Happenings
BEAR Holiday Fundraiser
2001 Holiday Shopping Card benefiting the American Cancer Society
Enron Kids 2001 Holiday Program
Support the Museum of Natural Science at the Crate & Barrel Opening Night Preview Party
Enron Night with the Houston Aeros
Free Carwashes for Enron Employees
American Heart Association "Heart Walk"

Enron Volunteer Opportunities
Volunteer for the 2001 Nutcracker Market "A World of Holiday Shopping"

Enron Wellness
CPR/First Aid Training
Mammogram Screening
November is Lung Cancer Awareness Month

Involved Employees
Par "Fore" Pets Golf Tournament

In addition, Enron in Action is available through a channel on my.home.enron.com.  To add this channel to your set-up click on the channels link at the top of the screen and under announcements check the Enron in Action box.

If you wish to add an announcement to Enron in Action, please fill out the attached form below and submit it to mailto:eia@enron.com no later than 12 PM Thursday each week.


---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron on 04/17/2001 03:25
PM ---------------------------

Dan Masters@ECT
04/12/2001 04:12 PM
To: cskinner@cabotlng.com
cc: jmichalek@cabotlng.com, radamiak@cabotlng.com, Victor
Vega/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, swiedermann@EdisonMission.Com, Rick
Sierra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron,
jmckechnie@cabotlng.com

Subject:

Chris,

As per clause 7.2 (a) (i) of the LNG sales contract we are providing you
EcoElctrica's Ninety Day Schedule given the two assumptions listed.

Assuming next ship is "Hilli"
3-7 May '01 "Hilli"
22-26 Jun '01 "Matthew"
1-5 Aug '01 "Matthew"

Assuming next ship is "Matthew"
17-21 May '01 "Matthew"
3-7 July '01 "Matthew"
11-15 Aug '01  "Matthew"

Regards,
Dan Masters


Attached  are two files that illustrate the following:

As prices rose, supply increased and demand decreased.  Now prices are
beginning to fall in response these market responses.


Congrats!

I've been looking for an explanation for the drop of our stock price.  This
explains everything.

D

Beverly Beaty
03/13/2001 11:02 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Contact for Devon

I'm going to work for Transco....starting 3/27

Bev

Daren J Farmer
03/13/2001 10:55 AM
To: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Contact for Devon

What do you mean "leaving Enron"?  Where are you going?

D

Beverly Beaty
03/13/2001 09:11 AM
To: Charlene.Merrill@dvn.com, Victor.Haley@dvn.com, Alan.Coad@dvn.com,
Deana.Thayer@dvn.com
cc: Mark L Schrab/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kirk Lenart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa
Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christina Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darren
Espey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, George F Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margie
Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ellenberger/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jessica White/NA/Enron@Enron, Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Teresa McOmber/NA/Enron@ENRON, hpl.scheduling@enron.com, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Contact for Devon

Please note that I will be leaving Enron as of March 23,2001.  Please send
future e-mails regarding
Devon changes to Kathy Kelly and Clarissa Garcia, as well as the schedulers
that you are already sending
changes too.  They will coordinate all future Devon inquiries and changes.

If there are questions before then, please call me at 713-853-6357

Thanks,
Beverly Beaty


Scott--give me some guidance on how important or relevent this issue is for
us so that I can get a better understanding of what I should/should not being
spending time on.

The Minnesota PUC ruled yesterday the US West must open/share it's lines with
competitors offering digital subscriber line (DSL) high speed interent
access.  Apparently the order is the first for a state, but I understand that
the FCC passed a similiar rule in the last month or so.  The Commission also
ruled that USWest could charge an additional $6.00 for this access to their
lines (in addition to the current rate of $18 that the customer pays) and
that the DSL provider had the right to pass that charge on to the customer.
The COmmission took a "soft" position on the $6.00, saying that they would
review the amount of the charge over the next six months before making a
final ruling on that specific issue.  I believe that this ruling came about
due to an initial complaint by  a provider from Colorado.

I did not follow this case at all other than occassionally reading something
about it. The major reason I did not was that I saw it as a "retail" access
issue and I see our video streaming and bandwidth businesses as "wholesale"
access/opportunity issues.  Certainly we always want to see open access and
we want to see competitive parity, but I didn't see that our involvment
and/or tracking of this proceeding was of great value.  Am I correct?


Tina,

In the future, if you have a message regarding John Lavorato's schedule,
could you please send it to me instead of sending it to John.

Also, you did not provide the time, however, Kay Chapman indicated that the
meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m.  John is not available at 2:00 p.m.

Thank you

Kim

	From:  Tina Rode @ ECT                           09/25/2000 09:38 AM

To: George Schaefer/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Blair, William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Alstrom Meeting-Sept.26

Please plan on attending a meeting on Tuesday, Sept. 26 with Dave Delainey
and Dave Duran in EB3314, regarding Alstrom.

If you have any questions, please call Tina at ext.3 -9582.

Thank you.

Tina Rode


Barry,
 Can you elaborate on what you are referring to about AOS daily balancing
agreement?  Is this something that Stacy Dickson prepared for you?  If so,
please attach a copy for my review.

	Barry Tycholiz
	11/06/2000 05:01 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Crestar Document

Dan, I will not be sending this document to Crestar.  Raise this confirm
directly with Crestar in the final state and send  to them.  Assuming they
have no problem with the paper.... we should be done on the monthly firm deal.

Can you send down the paper on the AOS daily balancing agreement. This is a
seperate agreement that is secondary to the firm deal.

Thanks.


Any time on the 5th works for me.

"Parker, Scott" <Scott_Parker@kindermorgan.com> on 08/21/2001 08:16:39 AM
To:	"'Gadd, Eric'" <Eric.Gadd@ENRON.com>
cc:

Subject:	RE: Proposed meeting

I am out west the rest of this week and have some commitments for the
majority of next week.  From our discussion your open season doesn't close
until the end of the month and you needed that to gauge the interest in your
project.  Additionally, I have my people running some preliminary numbers on
our capability to transport volume to your kickoff point.  Given that how
does the 5th or 6th of September look?

-----Original Message-----
From: Gadd, Eric [mailto:Eric.Gadd@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 6:44 PM
To: scott_parker@kindermorgan.com
Subject: Proposed meeting

Scott,

We discussed having a meeting to consider ways + means that Transwestern
and Kinder Morgan could work together on the Sun Devil and Sonoran
expansion projects.  I'm available in Houston later this week (24th or
25th) or next week (28th, 30th, or 31st).  How would you like to
proceed?

Regards,

Eric Gadd

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000
04:32 PM ---------------------------

Biliana Pehlivanova <pehlivanova@sugar-land.oilfield.slb.com> on 01/28/2000
11:54:58 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: AIESEC

Dear Mr. Kaminski,

The following are the  personal and work e-mail addresses of the Polish
trainees in College Station.

Sylwester Rutkowski  sylwesterr@usa.net, sylwester.rutkowski@destia.com
Patricia Dalecka  pdalecka@hotmail.com, patrycia.dalecka@destia.com
Danusia Mas   danusia.mas@destia.com
Lidia Olczyk   lolczyk@usa.net, lidia.olczyk@destia.com
Robert Lyczak   rlyczak@yahoo.com, robert.lyczak@destia.com

I would like to invite you to join us for a paintball game next Saturday,
Feb 5th. The purpose of this event is to develop team building among our
student members, Board of Advisors, and corporate clients.

In addition, I would like to invite you to participate in our Mock
Sales day on Saturday, Feb. 12th.  During this day, the new members will
first receive training on AIESEC sales/knowledge and then role play with our
Board of Advisors and alumni acting as company
representatives. Sharing your AIESEC and work experience would be a
valuable contribution to our training program.

I will get in touch with you regarding these events in the beginning of
next week, as soon as I have the time and place finalized.

I appreciate your interest in working with us.

Best regards,

Biliana Pehlivanova
Vice President of Incoming Exchange
AIESEC Houston


Start Date: 10/27/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102721.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Yes we are here permanently, if the tenure gods cooperate; I am teaching at
Amherst
College, in the Department of Fine Arts.  Gemma is 3 1/2 and we are expecting
her
sister at the end of June, things are good given the upheaval moving
entails.  We
are going to be in Houston in March for the opening of the new building at
the MFA,
it's a tight trip but maybe we can have coffee or something, email me a phone
number
where we can get in touch.

Nice to hear from you

Mark Taylor wrote:

> Thanks for your card and hello to the whole family.  I didn't know you guys
were
> in Mass.  Is this a long term move?  Things are still pretty much the same
in
> Houston.  We'd certainly look forward to seeing more of you down this way!

--
DeWitt Godfrey, Assistant Professor
Department of Fine Arts
Amherst College
19 Fayerweather Hall
Amherst, MA 01002-5000
Tel  413 542 2162
Fax  413 542 7917
Email  dagodfrey@amherst.edu

 - dagodfrey.vcf


From: 	Choate, Heather
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:51 AM
Cc:	Bates, Kimberly; Hogan, Irena D.; Villarreal, Alex; Rangel, Ina; Vuittonet, Laura; Jackson, Brandee; Saldana, Alex; Superty, Robert; Hall, Bob M; Presas, Jessica; Quezada, Daniel; Showers, Digna; Greif, Donna; Lamadrid, Victor; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Calcagno, Suzanne; Farmer, Daren J.; Smith, George F.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Jaquet, Tammy; Young, Becky
Subject:	Logistics Commercial Realignment

After a careful review of the wholesale and retail gas trading and scheduling process it has been decided that the Gas Logistics teams should report directly into the Enron America's Commercial organization. This realignment will help to strengthen the commercial focus and communication between the trading desks and the schedulers and will play a critical role as Enron tries to maximize opportunities and maintain a competitive trading edge. The details are as follows:

Wholesale

Bob Superty will maintain his management of the Logistics support functions which include the Transport Rate team (Kim Olinger), Electronic Commerce team (Tammy Lee-Jaquet) and Regulatory Affairs teams (Suzanne Calcagno). In addition, Bob will now manage the Northeast Logistics team as part of the East desk. Bob will report directly to Scott Neal and will also help coordinate the Logistics function across all regions working closely with each of the regional Logistics Managers, Commercial desk heads and Enron Americas senior management team.

Victor LaMadrid will manage the Southeast Logistics team and will report directly to Scott Neal. Victor's knowledge and overall east desk experience will be critical to help  maximize east desk opportunities and promote new initiatives across all regions.

Lisa Kinsey will manage the Central Logistics team and will report directly to Hunter Shively.

Patti Sullivan will manage the West Logistics team and will report directly to Mike Grigsby.

Darren Farmer will manage the Texas Logistics team and will report directly to Tom Martin

George Smith will manage the Well Head Logistics team and will report directly to Fred Lagrasta.

Retail

Donna Greif will now report directly to Don Black. Each of the regional Logistics Managers (East - Marde Driscoll-Ernest, Central - Charlie Muzzy, West - Sabra Dinari) will continue to report directly to Donna. Donna will continue her ongoing efforts in the development and integration of the new retail trading systems, prior period adjustments and development of a strong and talented Logistics team.

Congratulations to all involved and welcome to the commercial gas team - John Lavorato, President and CEO, Enron Americas.
 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Assistants - Please forward on to your groups.


Please respond to Dear Mr.Kaminski,

I have found the EnronOnline project a very interesting one and have enjoyed
working with everyone in the Research department as well as those from other
departments. I am keenly interested in this area and was wondering if there
would be any summer internship opportunities. I have attached my resume to
this mail for your review and look forward to hearing from you soon.

Thank you

IVY GHOSE
RICE MBA 2002

 - resume.doc


On TW, TW allocated SoCal on the ID2 cycle for Sunday's gas day, due to SoCal non performance.
	We cut about 27,000 mmbtu.

	The Sequel 2000 conversion on the reports went well.  Brad's team was here to help Sunday morning
	and I believe that made things go smoother.  There were a few isolated situations which were turned
	around quickly.

	Otherwise it was quiet on the pipes.

	Thanks. Lynn


Oregon Law Institute, Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark
College, is pleased to present a program for paralegals and secretaries
on &Mastering Your Profession8 on Friday, June 15th, which by
proclamation of the Office of the Governor is &Paralegal Day8 in the
State of Oregon. The program, which is a valuable networking opportunity
for paralegals, will be held at the Standard Insurance Center Auditorium
in Portland.

Take advantage of our &early bird8 price of $115 for paralegals and
secretaries through June 11th (price includes lunch).

Equip your paralegals and secretaries with the necessary skills for a
successful career in the legal field. This program provides paralegals
with essential communication skills, as well as valuable  information on
how to master balance in his/her life, how to use personal image to
represent the legal profession with honor, and how to deal with ethical
situations that may arise.

The brochure is attached in PDF format. You may also contact the Oregon
Law Institute at 503-243-3326 or 800-222-8213 for a brochure or to
register your paralegal now at the &early bird8 tuition.

--
Oregon Law Institute
Northwestern School of Law
of Lewis & Clark College
620 SW Main, Suite 706
Portland, OR  97205
PH:      (503) 243-3326
         (800) 222-8213
FX:      (503) 242-2931
E-mail:  oli@lclark.edu

 - 01.pdf


I have this on my agenda for later today.  If I get back to you late today is that OK?

C

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  CoganJA@aol.com                           04/16/2001 08:16 AM

To:	sbreen@czn.com, cfoster@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Griffith Sales Proposal

Good morning,

Hope you had a great Easter weekend.

Attached are two (2) word files for your review.  First, there is the latest
draft of the Sales Proposal which reflects the best efforts and intra day
provisions.  Second, there is the Alternate Nominations provisions.  I spoke
with PPL this morning and said that I would try to get both of these
documents to them today.  Your timely review and comments are greatly
appreciated.

The Alternate Nominations language is being separately provided at the
request of PPL so that they can review it.  If they would like to have it
incorporated, it can easily incorporated into the proposal and/or agreement.

Chris, I used the working draft of the Enron/Citizens agreement from our
meeting last Monday in Houston to draft the Alternate Nominations language.
That draft did not provide for a price differentiation for nominations
between 8:30 and 9:00 am CPT.  Should there be one?

Best regard,

John

John A. Cogan

Johnco Group
3629 Lake Kristin Drive
Gretna, LA 70056
Phone  (504) 392-7557
Cell      (504) 491-2874
Fax      (208) 730-4713
 - PPL - Griffith Gas Sales Proposal-rev 4-6-01 Amend 4-16-01.ZIP


I have added group 'MarketingDashboard' to your profile for JavaWebStart. Please allow 15 minutes for server replication. Then you will need to logoff/logon.
If you have any problems, please feel free to give me a call.

Thanks,
Diane Becker
Omaha ETS Solution Center
x7454, 82-87-7454


please try to verify.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/16/99 11:47
AM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
09/16/99 10:16 AM
To: "MAIL - Caixa Postal Central" <MAIL@tfts.tozzini.com.br>
cc:
Subject: Re: E-mail

How about Friday, Sept. 17, at 9 am (Houston time) which is 11 am (Sao Paulo)
time?  Please advise.  Sara

"MAIL - Caixa Postal Central" <MAIL@tfts.tozzini.com.br> on 09/16/99 09:24:58
AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: E-mail

___________________________________________
Warning
NOTICE: This message is confidential. If you have received it by mistake
please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should
not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Thank you.

 - Em-enro2.doc


thanks

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 12/12/2000 02:19 PM
To: Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: (00-423) Natural Gas Margin Increase

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 02:23 PM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	12/12/2000 02:07 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-423) Natural Gas Margin Increase

Notice No. 00-423
December 12, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT: MARGIN RATE CHANGE

Effective Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 (close of business)

Futures Contract: Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures

Contract Months: All Months

Rate Change:
NYMEX Division Margins on Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contracts

Effective Date:  Wednesday, December 13, 2000 (close of business)

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin): Old:  $12,000  New:  $14,000

Member Customer (Initial Margin):            Old:  $13,200  New:  $15,400

Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):   Old:  $16,200  New:  $18,900

Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(00-423)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Consumers Energy Deal Summary

Part 1
On 11/9/00 ENA entered into an agreement with Consumers Energy to borrow 1 BCF in July-01 and payback in July-02 at the Consumers Citygate pool.  ENA agreed to pack Consumers Energy a demand fee of $680,000.  Payment date was set for July-.01.

Part 2
On 4/30/01 ENA unwound the deal with Consumers Energy .  ENA will reduce the demand fee from $680,000 to $130,000.  This is to be set for payment 5 business days after 4/30/01.  The previous sitara deal tickets are killed (sitara # 478110 on the injection and sitara # 478135 on the withdrawal).   The tagg# V67045 was unwound.


- GC010524.xls


The meeting will be held in EB5001.