-----Original Message-----
From: Susan.Kaspar.enronXgate@enron.com
[mailto:Susan.Kaspar.enronXgate@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:56 AM
To: Kean, Steven J.
Subject: RE: Security Update
Importance: High

STEVE,   I AM THE OFFICE MANAGER FOR THE ISC AND HANDLE SECURITY AND SAFTEY
ISSUES IN 2 AC 12th FLOOR.  DO YOU KNOW IF THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL
SECURITY MEASURES FOR THE ENRON EMPLOYEES WHO WORK IN 2 ALLEN CENTER AND 3
ALLEN CENTER?

Thank you,
Susan Kaspar
Integrated Solutions Center
Phone  713-345-6008
Cell    713-208-2459

      -----Original Message-----
     From:   Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Steve
             Kean@ENRON
     Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:04 PM
     To:     All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
     Subject:  Security Update

     Enron has been increasing security at its facilities around the world.
     Some  of the changes took effect immediately (e.g. additional security
     personnel) and some are phasing in.  While not all of the changes will
     be  visible,  there  are  a  few  that will have an impact on everyday
     activities.   In all the steps we take and recommendations we make, we
     will  be making our facilities and systems more secure and endeavoring
     to  increase  your sense of security, while doing our best to minimize
     disruption to our day-to-day business.

     Primary  responsibility  for  Enron  Corp.  Security  resides  in  our
     business  controls  organization.   You  can contact this organization
     through  their  website  (<http://home.enron.com/security>),  by phone
     (713-345-2804),     or     by    email    (CorporateSecurity@enron.com
     <mailto:CorporateSecurity@enron.com>).  John Brindle, Senior Director,
     Business  Controls,  leads  this  organization.   Please  feel free to
     provide  John  and  his  team  with your comments and questions, or to
     report security threats.

     We  have two areas to update you on:  changes in the access procedures
     for  the  Enron  Center  Campus  in  Houston and changes to our travel
     advisory.

     Access to the Enron Center

     Over  the  next few days, the following access control procedures will
     be  instituted  at  the  Enron  Center  (and  other  facilities  where
     practical):

          ?   As  employees swipe their badges at the card readers to enter
             the Enron Center, a guard will match the photo on the badge to
             the bearer.

          ?  Employees and contractors who forget their badges must present
             a  valid picture ID to obtain access to the Enron Center (U.S.
             driver's  license,  U.S.  or foreign passport, or some form of
             U.S. federal, state or local identification).

          ?   Visitors  to  the  Enron Center must produce a valid photo ID
             when   signing  in  at  the  lobby  reception  desk  and  must
             completely  fill out the visitor card.  Adult visitors without
             a  valid  photo  ID  (U.S.  driver's  license, U.S. or foreign
             passport,  or  some  form  of  U.S.  federal,  state  or local
             identification)  will  not  be  allowed  access  to  the Enron
             Center.

          ?   Visitors  to  Enron  facilities  must be escorted by an Enron
             employee or badged contractor at all times.

          ?   Visitors  to  the Enron Center will be met in the lobby by an
             Enron  employee  or badged contractor, signed into a visitor's
             log  at  the  lobby  reception  area by the employee or badged
             contractor,   and  escorted  to  their  appointment.   At  the
             conclusion of the appointment, the visitor will be escorted to
             the  lobby  by  an  employee or badged contractor, the visitor
             badge  collected, and the visitor signed out in the log at the
             plaza  reception  area  by  the  escorting  employee or badged
             contractor.

          ?   Employees are also being asked to participate in the security
             of  their  workplace  by  following  these  guidelines; report
             suspicious  activity  to  Security (phone 3-6300), do not open
             secured  doors  for  individuals  unknown to you or hold doors
             open, allowing "tail gating" by others.

     These  will  be the first in a series of new security procedures to be
     instituted  at  Enron.   We  ask  that all employees be patient during
     congested  times  in  the  lobby.   As we proceed and obtain increased
     guard   personnel  and  equipment,  we  expect  the  inconvenience  to
     decrease.   We hope you understand these measures are being instituted
     for the security of all our employees.

     Travel Advisory Update

     With  the  beginning  of  retaliatory  strikes,  we have two important
     recommendations:

          ?   While the retaliatory strikes are ongoing, corporate security
             recommends  that  travel  through  or  to  the  Middle East be
             avoided.   We  continue  to strongly recommend that all travel
             during  this  time to Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, Indonesia,
             Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Georgia,
             and   the  Kyrgyz  Republic  be  canceled.   In  addition,  we
             recommend  that  planned  travel  to  Egypt, Israel, Gaza/West
             Bank,  Jordan,  Lebanon,  Saudi  Arabia, Syria, and Algeria be
             very carefully considered.

          ?    For  non-U.S.  citizens  traveling  in  the  United  States,
             corporate  security  recommends  that you carry documentation.
             There  have  been  several recent reports of non-U.S. citizens
             who reside in the United States being questioned and asked for
             documentation  when  boarding  U.S.  domestic  flights.  As  a
             result,  we  suggest  that all non-U.S. citizens who currently
             reside  in  the  United States - and who do not have Permanent
             Resident  Alien  status  - carry their passport, Form I-94 and
             Form I-797 at all times.  We would also suggest that Permanent
             Resident Aliens carry their Permanent Resident (Green) Card as
             proof  of their status as a precautionary measure.  It appears
             that  Immigration  Officials  may be applying a section of the
             Immigration and Nationality Act that requires individuals over
             the  age  of  18 to carry his/her "registration" documentation
             with  them at all times. This can include a Permanent Resident
             Card,  Form  I-94  card, Employment Authorization Card, Border
             Crossing  Card,  or  a  Temporary  Resident  Card. Immigration
             Officials have not historically been asking domestic travelers
             for   "registration"   documentation,  but  in  light  of  the
             heightened  security measures and current atmosphere, it would
             be  best to be prepared with all of your documentation proving
             your current lawful status.

     We  will  keep you apprised of new information and developments on the
     Corporate Security website and by e-mail, as appropriate.


In its ATCP filed on October 2, 2000, SDG&E's testimony demonstrates that it
will purposefully overcollect CTCs October 1, 2000 through December 31, 2002,
in order to help subsidize the undercollections due to its Energy Rate
Ceiling.  Not only is SDG&E trying to apply the stranded benefits caused by
the high market prices for energy from QFs, SONGS ICIP, and Purchased Power
Agreements with PGE and PNM, SDG&E is trying to artificially keep the CTC
rates charged to retail customers in place in order to accumulate
overcollections to apply against its undercollections due to its Energy Rate
Ceiling.  This amounts to a subsidy from customers who do not benefit from
the ceiling, primarily large customers.  This is evidenced by the fact that
SDG&E expects a TCBA overcollection of $229 million at the end of December
31. 2001 based on CTC rates designed to collect $115 million in 2001 from
retail customers per their Application. 99-09-011.  (Their is not a decision
on this application yet, we may want to file comments if we can.)  In the
current application filed on October 2, SDG&E proposed to continue with the
CTC rates designed to collect $115 million plus expects an overcollection in
stranded benefits of $37 million in stranded benefits.  An overcollection of
$229 million at the end of 2001 combined with an additional overcollection of
$152 million in 2002, results in a whopping $381 million overcollection that
to apply against their estimated $528 million undercollection from the Energy
Rate Ceiling.

This has to be illegal; overcharging all customers to benefit a few.
Further, I have fundamental problems with the fact the SDG&E is not passing
on stranded benefits to all customers while prices are high, because you know
that all customers will have to pay the stranded costs when commodity prices
are low.

We need to do something about the 2001 and 2002 CTC rates that SDG&E plans to
put into effect.

Roger


One last question Matt, are daily flow rates given for each of the pipelines - broken into smaller areas.  Meaning, are the numbers on a public site or do you have them?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt
Sent:	Friday, April 20, 2001 12:03 PM
To:	Thomas, George
Subject:	RE: california flows

The Socal numbers are in MMBtu's and the PGE numbers are in 1000s of MMBtu's.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, George
Sent:	Friday, April 20, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	RE: california flows

Are the units used MMBtu or cubic feet.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt
Sent:	Friday, April 20, 2001 10:08 AM
To:	Thomas, George
Subject:	california flows

George,

Per our conversation, here's the requested information.  These forecasts are constantly evolving and this was a snapshot a few weeks ago, but it generally provides the required information.  If you wish to get into the detail we could spend some time next week.

Mat
 << File: New CA Power Generation.xls >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 09:49
AM ---------------------------
From: Geriann Warner on 03/07/2001 09:07 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Chauncey Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lorie
Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Conf. Call  - 3/7 @ 10:00 cst: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of
Engagement

Per Marchris' request, I've set up a conference call for today at 10:00 cst.
Please let me know ASAP if you WILL NOT be able to participate.

Call in  - 1.800.998.2462

Pass code  - 5058917

Geriann Warner
GA - The Americans
Tel: 713-853-5036
Fax: 713-853-7297

----- Forwarded by Geriann Warner/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 08:30 AM -----

	Marchris Robinson
	03/06/2001 05:19 PM

		 To: Geriann Warner/NA/ENRON@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Set up conference call.  Page me with info.

MR
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 05:18 PM -----

	Kay Mann
	03/06/2001 04:57 PM

		 To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Ben and I can make it.

Kay

From: Marchris Robinson on 03/06/2001 04:30 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

I think we should do a phone conference to resolve the outstanding issues
regarding the engagement of "local lobbying firms" by ENA.  I will schedule a
call for tomorrow at 10:30am (cst).  Please advise if that time works with
your schedule.  Thanks.

Marchris
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 04:21 PM -----

	Kay Mann
	03/06/2001 09:27 AM

		 To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Hi Marchris,

I'm in ENA Legal, and I'm looking for the right person to discuss this with.
Christi Nicholay suggested I get you involved.  Please give me a call at 713
345 7566 to discuss.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 09:29
AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
03/05/2001 10:48 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

OK. This guy's a lawyer by training, but we're hiring him as a lobbyist.
Roger was previously looking into this, and proposed our standard form
agreement. Steve and I were wondering if we could work off of Tripp Scott's
proposed form, considering that he will not be representing us as our counsel.

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Ben

Kay Mann@ENRON
03/04/2001 02:27 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Ben,

What are these folks supposed to do for Enron?  I had heard a rumor that we
were looking to hire someone to lobby for us on a success fee basis.  Is this
the same deal?  I know on the international side there were hoops to jump
through before such an engagement could be signed off on.  I'll have to check
to see what the drill is on this side of the street.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/28/2001 12:18 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Per my earlier e-mail, attached is Tripp Scott's form.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 12:17 PM
---------------------------

Steven Krimsky@ENRON
02/28/2001 09:11 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed, Roger has no problem engaging Tripp Scott.  He does want to use
Enron's standard 9 page engagement letter in lieu of the attached 2 pager
received from Tripp Scott.  Is this necessary - any thoughts?

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Steven Krimsky
02/16/2001 03:44 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed in Fort Pierce, Tripp Scott is that insurance policy I've been
looking for to help secure the commission vote in Pompano.  Tripp Scott will
also assist us in our door knock campaign in the County & Tallahassee.
Pozzuoli is a mover & shaker and is on a first name basis with Jeb Bush -  he
was the Chairman for the Bush/Cheny Broward County re-count.

Bill Keith & Debbie Orshefsky highly recommends the engagement.

Lets discuss Tuesday.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/16/2001
03:38 PM ---------------------------

"Edward J. Pozzuoli (Paulette R Segal)" <PRS@trippscott.usa.com> on
02/14/2001 01:56:42 PM
To: steven.krimsky@enron.com
cc: TSCS.TSCS-1.ejp@mail4.allegro.net

Subject: Proposed Terms of Engagement

It was a pleasure meeting with you and Debbie on Monday afternoon.  Per our
discussion, enclosed is Tripp Scott's proposed terms of engagement as well as
an abbreviated description of the firm and its key directors.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Ed
 - 239299.WPD
 - 239243.WPD


In

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hull, Bryan
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Bass, Eric; Baumbach, David; Hiemstra, Nick; Love, Phillip M.; Mathews, Reagan; Plachy, Denver; Winfree, O'Neal D.
Subject:	Wed

Our game is at 7 this week. Let me know if you're in.


John
I would like to confirm you have recieved the  fabrics & info.? Please give
me a call with any questions.
Tommy


Gary,

Thanks for your e-mail of 4/9/01.  We cannot agree to the suggested language
regarding arbitration in Section 13.  We will of course agree to New York as
jurisdiction.

Please let me have your thoughts on how you would like to proceed.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


<http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>	  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>	  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>	  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>	  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>	  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>
 mickey <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/mickey.jpg>
? Disney
Must be 18 years or older to order video, one per household. Offer expires 3/31/02.	   <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>	The memories are priceless.
The video is free.

Order our FREE Walt Disney World
 Vacation Planning Video and discover why this is the year to visit. See what's happening in all four Theme Parks during our yearlong 100 Years of Magic Celebration. Find out everything from where to stay to how to dine with your favorite Disney Characters. Don't delay! Order now <http://godisney.com/find/1.15World.1?d=29%26c%3D1493%26u%3D10387082%26>.

  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>
  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>	  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/email-ver1_04.gif>	  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>	  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>

Click hereto order yourfree video. <http://godisney.com/find/1.15World.1?d=29%26c%3D1493%26u%3D10387082%26>
  <http://psc.disney.go.com/dcl/images/vpv/spacer.gif>

Your questions are important to us, but please don't reply to this email because we are unable to respond from this address. One of our Travel Planners will answer your questions personally when you call 407-W-DISNEY.

This message was sent to: scorman@enron.com

You've received this message because you provided your email address and wanted to hear more about upcoming Disney events, future vacations and offers via email.

Walt Disney Parks and Resorts sometimes has special offers and news you'll enjoy, but if you'd rather not receive e-mail from us about the WALT DISNEY WORLD
 Resort just click here <http://keyword.abc.go.com/find/1.15WorldPrefCtr?d=37%26c%3D1493%26u%3D10387082%26>.

  <http://ts.go.com/bk?bs=2&bj=3115&bu=c=1493/u=10387082>


Matt,

Please take a look at these spreadsheets and calc the gas usage by plant and
by pipe in CA.  Chris Foster is telling us that most of these palnts will be
shutting down in the next few weeks due to credit exposure.  Let's discuss
the impact on sendouts.

Thanks,
Grigsby
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001 01:05
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris H Foster                           01/18/2001 03:45 PM

To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Power Plants

Philip is a list of the gas plants.  CEC list is all plants including QFs and
non QFs (i.e.utility plants and the IPPs - Reliant, SOuthern et al).

Chris


DEAR KEN ,  I JUST WANT TO WRITE YOU A SHORT NOTE TO EXPRESS HOW SORRY I AM FOR THE PAIN AND ORDEAL YOU HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO THESE PAST FEW WEEKS. NO MAN WHO HAS DONE SO MUCH FOR SO MANY SHOULD HAVE TO FACE DAY AFTER DAY WHAT YOU MUST BE GOING THROUGH . YOU ARE A GIANT AND A HERO IN MY EYES AND WILL ALWAYS REMAIN SO.   MY DAUGHTERS , SISTER , AND I ARE PROUD TO HAVE BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH YOU AND LINDA AND TO CALL YOU OUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY. HOPE TO SEE THE BOTH OF YOU SOON..................DON PATE


It is with sadness and regret that we announce that Cliff Baxter is resigning as an employee of Enron.  We are happy, though, that Cliff's primary reason for resigning is to spend more time with his family.

Cliff is a unique talent.  His creativity, intelligence, sense of humor, and straightforward manner have been assets to the company throughout his career.  He will be missed.

Cliff joined Enron in 1991 and was a key member of the team that built Enron's wholesale business.  Before becoming Vice Chairman of Enron, Cliff served in a variety of positions in Enron's wholesale businesses, culminating in his appointment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Enron North America in 1999.

We have asked Cliff, and he has agreed, to continue in a consulting role for the company while concluding negotiations on a number of key asset dispositions.

Please join us in thanking Cliff for his service to the company and in wishing him the very best.


Robert B Cothran
Enron Americas
713-853-3478


Christine,

We shall arrange a phone interview with you.

Vince


Carlos,

Please look into your Black Marlin info and see if you can find anything on
this.  Thanks.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 12/29/99 06:57
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Stella L Morris                           12/28/99 05:55 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revision - Black Marlin - meter 986782 for 8/98 - UA4

Revision - According to measurement, there is flow of 7,394 in 8/98, however,
there is nothing to indicate this is gas that was received on HPL in OSS.   I
checked MIPs and there is a measurement statement that supports the flow rate
of 7,394 MMBTu.

Daren is there a deal in CPR which may not have fed over to OSS?   I checked
OSS for the whole year of 1998 and there are no other deals in OSS.  It does
seem strange that this is the only month of flow.

Thanks, Stella


Please see the attached documents.

Mandelker document

Dasovich document

Luntz documents
 - PRINCIPLES 4 with notes.doc

 - Pro-Dereg - revised.doc
 - Pro-Reg-revised.doc

D. Haug's Response - Steve Kean Talking Points


Thanks for the update.

Ross Koller
11/14/2000 03:01 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

it isn't dead, but things are moving slowly.

the deal was initiated and is still being headed by jarek astramovicz (sp?)
head of the warsaw office.  he says he is getting the green light from
sheriff to proceed, despite the potential headlines.  however, the lead
finance/origination guy here in london, michael mills, has resigned.  i
talked to paul chivers about the deal yesterday and he will take mills' spot
temporarily.

in the meantime the polish govt has also ruled that pkn (owners of other
polish ref) will not be allowed to bid, as jarek predicted, and which puts us
in a good position.

we have not done anything yet, because i did not want to start working on
something that did not get official backing, and support from finance.
what we will need to do as soon as everybody has gotten over the
ramifications, is put together the various curves (fob basis) for the main
products for 3-5 years out (length of our potential put option).  so far our
attitude is that we treat this as an export ref and we will deal with the
products as such.  any money made from the internal market will be gravy.

if we get management sign-off, this deal has a high potential of happening,
and we will be handed 25pct of a refinery, and probably control over the
products execution and hedging.
will keep you posted.

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           14/11/2000 00:18

To: Ross Koller/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

Any updates on the Gdansk refinery, or should I assume that the deal is dead?

Jeff


It is unbelievable how the management (both past and present) think they can run a business with no regard for the customer.  They have to be one of the worst marketing organizations in the world.  They have a great product, but don't have a clue on how to promote it.

Another big news item : PPI used to be the headline sponser.  They left a few years ago and FedEx came on board.  Rumors are rampant that FedEx will be leaving soon.  You have to wonder what it takes to make the light go on for some people.

It is extremely frustrating to try and continue to be a fan.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Wednesday, October  17, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	Couch, Greg
Subject:	RE: CART

Maybe you should stump for president of the series.  Actually, that would be a great job.  You couldn't do much worse, it seems.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Couch, Greg
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:56 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	RE: CART

I've been warning them for years (the BOZO!!! management) to get their act together.  But who am I?  I'm just a stupid lowly fan who knows nothing in their eyes.....

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Wednesday, October  17, 2001 8:13 AM
To:	Couch, Greg
Subject:	RE: CART

That sounds very bad.  Did I read that correctly?  It basically says that the series is on the brink of collapse.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Couch, Greg
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:09 PM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	RE: CART

Very interesting.  I'd saw where it was settled, but only a small statement.

If you think that is interesting, then check this one out :

http://espn.go.com/rpm/cart/2001/1013/1263571.html

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Tuesday, October  16, 2001 3:35 PM
To:	Couch, Greg
Subject:	CART

http://www.espn.go.com/rpm/cart/2001/1016/1264679.html


Per your conversation with Steve.

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 02/05/2001 12:02 PM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	02/02/2001 05:46 PM

		 To: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Talking Points - Chambers

Here are the talking points for Jeff's discussion with Chambers


great -- let me know your feedback.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Seleznov, Ryan
Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Invitation to Seyfarth Shaw Half Day Seminar

I'm going.

R.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:06 AM
To:	Seleznov, Ryan; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Oxley, David; Hope, Valeria A.; Skinner, Cindy; Melodick, Kim; Slone, Jeanie; Funkhouser, Shanna; Hill, Dave (HR); Davies, Neil; O'rourke, Tim; McLoughlin, Hector; De Jesus, Frank; Mayes, Fran; Walton, Sheila; Buck, Gary; Curless, Amanda; Hermann, Robert
Subject:	FW: Invitation to Seyfarth Shaw Half Day Seminar

Hello, all.

Attached is an invitation from Seyfarth Shaw to attend their labor and employment seminar.  It is scheduled for Tuesday, 7/17, and lasts only a half-day.  Generally, their seminars are high quality.  Plus, the cost is only $50.

Let me know if you plan to attend.

Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Christi Kennedy" <ckennedy@seyfarth.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Christi+20Kennedy+22+20+3Cckennedy+40seyfarth+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:23 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Invitation to Seyfarth Shaw Half Day Seminar

At the request of Ted Meyer, attached is an electronic invitation to Seyfarth Shaw's Half Day Labor & Employment Law Seminar to be held June 17 in Houston and June 19 in Dallas.

If you should have any questions please feel free to contact the Houston office at (713) 225-2300.

Christi Kennedy
Marketing Assistant
SEYFARTH SHAW
(312) 739-6981
ckennedy@seyfarth.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND/OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION,  DISTRIBUTION  OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
 - hou_dall.pdf << File: hou_dall.pdf >>


Seems that we could provide Lay/Skilling with the power point slides as prep
for any calls.  As a starter, it would be useful to provide McNeally with a
letter that he could send to federal and state decision makers.

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	10/06/2000 06:47 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com,
skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Rebecca Smith

Jeff --

Let's see if we can get material to Lay or Skilling to call McNeally this
week (Oct 9) so that we ask if they'll talk with Rebecca by Oct 15.  What
exactly do we need to give to Lay or Skilling before the call?  What will
Enron send to McNeally if he agrees?  Do we have all of this?

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	10/06/2000 09:55 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com,
skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Rebecca Smith

Agree completely.  Notion I had was that we give Rebecca the slides, tell her
the story on background, then she trots off to interview McNeally, Ellison,
etc.  Just a thought.  Might be easier, faster channel that achieves the
quick action/message we're looking for.

	James D Steffes
	10/05/2000 08:30 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com,
skean@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Rebecca Smith

I don't disagree with Jeff that the WSJ would be a great message point.  I
would recommend, however, that one of Enron's allies interview for the
story.  For Enron to speak for the hi-tech industry is a bit questionable.
Better if we can approach Intel or Sun now and ask them to talk with R. Smith.

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/05/2000 04:55 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rebecca Smith

FYI.  Rebecca got back in touch wanting to talk about the history of dereg in
California.  Been trading messages.  When she gets back to me with what she
wants to discuss, I'll check back in before having the conversation.
Question:  What about giving her a copy of our high tech slides with the
intent of getting her to do a story on it?  She might be a good "carrier."
Thoughts?  One story has already hit the SJ Mercury News.

Best,
Jeff


i figured you might, well go for lunch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:48 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

maybe around 10:30 or 11:00.  You know I'm going to want to eat.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:45 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

ok good, let me know when you want to leave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:45 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

DUH!!  I want company.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:44 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

let me know if you want company

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:44 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I think we have to be there at 2:00. But I was thinking about leaving early to go shopping or eat or something.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:41 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i think so, what time are you supposed to go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:40 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

It's about your benefits and crap like that...You have to fill out all of these forms and stuff.  Did you get a packet of stuff to fill out?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:39 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

do you know what its about

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:39 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Ok...I am pretty pissed off about having to go, but I don't want to get in trouble for not going.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:37 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

if you dont let me know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:34 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I don't know yet.  We'll just have to see.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:32 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

you too, so are you going to go to the meeting

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:32 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I was thinking about that this morning on my way in.  You look really nice today!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:30 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i dont realy think so but what do i know, by the way its a really ugly day out there

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:27 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I thought we had to go?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:26 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i dont know are you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:11 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Are you going to that lame ass orientation today at the Houstonian?


[IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]        [IMAGE] Ofoto.com: Beautiful Prints & Frames, Delivered to Your Door     Share Albums  Buy Prints  Ofoto Store   [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   issue 18 | september 2001 [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  ? DuraLife Paper: See and Feel the Difference [IMAGE]   ? Sharing Prints and Gifts Just Got Easier [IMAGE]   ? Tips for Taking Great Portraits   ? 8 x 10" Prints: Look at the Big Picture!   ? Creative Clicks   ? Save Your Summer Memories in Scrapbooks   ? More Memory Means More Fun   ? Download OfotoNow?        [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]    Dear larry,   It always amazes me how summer flies by so quickly, and here at Ofoto we didn't get much of a break. But, we did develop some new features that will improve both your vacation and back-to-school prints, as well as make them even easier to share. Read on for details, plus some useful photo tips and other thoughts for the new season.    [IMAGE] Cheers, [IMAGE] James Joaquin, President    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  DuraLife Paper DuraLife Paper  DuraLife Paper: Feel and See the Difference [IMAGE]  We are upgrading our printing process, so soon all your photos (up to 8 x 10") will be printed on Kodak's premium DuraLife paper. Your prints will be:   Tough and tear-resistant.  Brighter and sharper than ever.  Thicker, so they're easier to slip into albums.  Easier to write on the back.   This is a major improvement! Best of all, at Ofoto you get this incredible quality at the same low print prices as before. Buy prints today  ? you'll feel and see the difference.  [IMAGE]  Sharing prints with OfotoSharing Prints and Gifts Just Got Easier [IMAGE] Introducing Ofoto's New Shipping Features   You asked us to make it faster and easier to share copies of your prints, so we did! Now you can order prints, frames and more and send them to everyone you want all at once. You can even share orders you've already placed. Next time you place an order, send copies to the special people in your life. They'll love it!  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  OFOTO TIP  Get Up Close and Personal Five Tips for Taking Great Portraits   Back-to-school season is also portrait season! You don't have to be a pro to take portraits worth putting on your mantle, but it does help to know a few professional secrets. That's why we've enlisted photography expert Kim Brady of the Imaging Resource to share her top five tips for taking great portraits .  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] 8 x 10" Prints: Look at the Big Picture!   Make sure your portraits and other treasured photos get the attention they deserve - enlarge them to 8 x 10". For just $3.99 per print you can turn any photo into a real showpiece. It's really easy ? try 8 x 10" prints  today (and don't forget the frames )!  [IMAGE]   Student picturesCreative Clicks   Here's a heartwarming story from Robin K. of Santa Ana, California:   "I'm a teacher in an inner city school and use my digital camera to take pictures of the children all the time. For Open House I gave pictures I had printed at Ofoto to each of my students. The parents left with a great scrapbook page of their child and the students left with a great memory of the time spent with their parents. Thanks Ofoto for making it so easy."   We were so inspired by Robin's story that we sent her some scrapbooks  from the Ofoto store for her class. Remember, if we use your Creative Click you'll receive 25 free prints, so send your ideas to creativeclicks@ofoto.com .    [IMAGE]   Browse our Scrapbook selection Save Your Summer Memories in Scrapbooks    Vacation season is over, the kids are back in school, and it's time to put those summer photos in a place where they can always be enjoyed: scrapbooks! Browse our scrapbook selection  in the Ofoto store ? you're sure to find the perfect home for your summer memories. Start shopping  today.  [IMAGE]   Kodak Picture Cards    More Memory Means More Fun    Have you ever missed a great shot because you ran out of film? Don't let that happen with your digital camera ? stock up on Kodak Picture Cards , the digital equivalent of film. Available in a variety of sizes, they work in any CompactFlash-compatible device and can be reused hundreds of times. Kodak has just lowered the prices on several of their cards, so it's a great time to buy. Get started  now!   [IMAGE]   OfotoNow(TM)  Download OfotoNow?    Are you taking advantage of the quickest and easiest way to get your digital photos online? If you don't already have our free OfotoNow software, download version 2  today!       If you enjoyed this issue of OfotoFocus please forward it to a friend.  Thanks!       Unsubscribe info: OfotoFocus is sent to registered Ofoto users who have requested that we send them offers and information. If you prefer not to receive these offers or information, please reply to this email and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line before sending.   Copyright ? 2001 Ofoto, Inc. All rights reserved. Ofoto and the Ofoto logo are registered trademarks of Ofoto, Inc.   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]


Hello Bob
Yes that's right - although it should all be done now, although I had a call
saying they hadn't received the doc , although I did courier it round.
Unfortunately I am having to work from home today because of flooding in
south of England - so I can't check the file - but will do so as soon as I
get back to the office
Michael

To: michael.slade@enron.com
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: GFI Non disclosure

I am working with Andy Zipper on the Broker Client application.  I talked to
Colin Hefron at GFI and his attorney is apparently working with you on the
Non Disclosure Agreement.  Please let me know the status so that I can move
forward on discussions with GFI.  My number is 713 853-0397.


- Paragraph 3: Same concern as in last email.
- Paragraph 4: Are we happy to forego the application of the liabilities
clause whenever a Counterparty does a transaction under a Master agreement,
instead of a GTC?

Dave

   Carol St Clair @ ECT                05/11/2000 07:12 PM

To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Kennecott ETA Amendment Letter

David:
Enclosed is a new draft of the Kennecott amendment letter.  Mark and I have
discussed the counterparty termination language and have come up with the
language that I have high;lighted.  Upon your approval, I plan to use the
same language for the Duke and Cinnergy letters.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


Kathleen,

There were three original assignment and assumption agreements:  One of CAED
I (GE) and two for CAED II (one for GE, one for ABB).  I only see two in my
packet, and only two are referenced in the transmittal letter.  HELP!!!!!!!!
This is obviously urgent.

Kay


Lloyd,

I would like Ricardo and I to sit down with Kevin and go over how our PJM
load forecast model works. I want to use it, or a version of it, for day to
day sensitivity analysis. I haven't met Kevin yet so if you could mention
this to him I would appreciate it. I would also like to sit down with you
some time this week to talk about PJM fundamentals and co-ordinating our
analytical efforts. I want to get a feel for what we have done and set some
goals as to what needs to be done. Let me know if one afternoon this week
works for you.

Thanx,

Chris Dorland


MAKE FREE DVD MOVIES!!!!  New Full Download Version Offered Nowhere Else!!   DOWNLOAD INSTANTLY!!!  . CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD NOW!   This is the "HOTTEST" Software in the USA!    FREE FREE FREE    Order DVD Copy Wizard NOW and Take Advantage Of This Special Limited Time Offer!     Get Our Amazing VHS and PlayStation Copy Wizards For FREE!   CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD NOW!


Andy,

Thanks for taking the time in reading the posting agreement and making
comments.

It is worth remembering that given a choice we would not be entering into
this posting agreement.    The historical agreement with MG dictates many of
the variances we will see from your other posting agreements.

Given the short time frame here, Justin is in the process of trying to set up
a call with Travis and you for later today.  I have tried to address a couple
of the points you raise below.

regards
bruce

Andy Zipper@ENRON
11/27/2000 09:49 PM
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Bruce Garner/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: eMetra posting agreement

I have read and reviewed the Posting Agreement. Let me preface my comments by
saying that I'm sure there is stuff in the Posting Agreement that I am
missing and I really want Travis McCullough to review it. I'm also curious as
to why in certain sections it is faithful to the agreement I sent  and in
other places seems to stray or omits things. Anyway here are my comments:

1). Whereas (A). How many eMetra platforms are there ? what does
"collectively the Platforms" mean ? The agreement should be specific as to
which platforms eMetra can display prices on.  There are two platforms one
physical and one financial.  The primary focus of this agreement is on
financial platform.

2). Regulatory Event, This language should really mirror the Posting
Agreements in place. The language should cover the situation that if any of
the events mentioned subject Enron or any of its affiliates to regulation it
is a Regulatory Event, even if it does not impact upon the way eMetra
conducts its business as contemplated by the agreement.

3). Term 2.2, There is no time limit on the date that eMetra commences LME
trading. Given that the language is worded as the later of" this leaves them
with all the leverage. It should be the earlier of. This is a big one as they
could sit around forever trying to make it work and we are still bound by an
agreement that runs 18 months from forever.  I agree with you on this one.
Starting the clock now does not work but we should be able to set the clock
at 18 months from Ap 30, 2001.

4). Establishment and Maintenance of Interfaces 4.1 We need to agree on who
is responsible for what interfaces in this agreement, upfront. These were
detailed in the agreement I sent to you. They are to responsible for
maintaining the interfaces so we do not want to build them. In general we are
responsible for specifying the interfaces and they are responsible for
building and operating them. Once again, please refer to the posting
agreement that was sent for the exhibits detailing this.

5). Execution of Transactions 5.1 All parties agree to be bound by Enron's
General Terms and Conditions.  We can discuss on the phone call.

6) Execution of Transactions 5.2.3 Please use the exact language from the
Posting  Agreement sent. This wording is unclear. There is no time of
transacting as there is no transaction unless price and volume are available
at time of receipt of proposed transaction.

7). Execution of Transactions General comment: There is no language referring
to eMetra taking responsibility for Mapping Errors. This is a big issue. We
will not be responsible if they incorrectly display our prices, i.e. 3 mo.
Aluminium displayed as 6 mo. Aluminium. Please refer to Posting Agreement for
language.  I agree

8). Co-Operation 7.2 and 7.3 I would like to see both of these deleted. We
have not given this to anyone else and it seems to be indirect conflict with
13. This section pretty much rules out that we market EnronOnline to our
customers and I don't see how we can live with it.  I think we would be
willing to substitute some form of non-disparagement language in its place.
We are balancing a couple of issues here.  Some of this is specific for
Emetra.  John Sherriff has been involved in the business issues that have
been agreed to.  Not withstanding the support of Emetra, we believe we have
the freedom to market EOL and are released from the non-compete.

9). Default and Termination 9.1.1  How is the release from the non-compete
tied to breach of this agreement ? There is no link between breach under this
agreement and non-compete.

10). Default and Termination 9.1.1 Strike the term material from sentence.
All parts of this agreement are material or they wouldn't be in it. Fine

11).  Default and Termination 9.1.4 and Enron Operational Failure. This is
too broad. Only the failure of an aspect of the Enron platform that affects
participants ability to conduct business with Enron through eMetra is
relevant.  Fine

12). Cost and Expenses. eMetra bears all costs relating to connectivity (i.e.
T1's)  between eMetra to the Enron platform. Fine

13). Assignment should read "eMetra's right to display Enron's prices..."
Fine

As I said earlier I'm sure there are things I 've left out and strongly
suggest that Travis review it before signing.

Thanks,
Andy


John,

These are the Auto Cadd files to send to Transco.

Terri


It was great working with all of you.  I look forward to future opportunities.

My contact info will be.........

nsainsburycarter@houston.rr.com
713-869-9842

Best Regards,
-Neil


Will you please set up two new indices in the database.  The first one will
be NGI Southern Border, Socal.  This is different for the current NGI Socal
border index in the system.  Also, please set up NGI Southern Border, PG&E.
Let me know when they have been added.  These indices will begin posting in
NGI for April, 2001.

Thank you,
Mike Grigsby
x37031


Patti,

Chris said you had problems gettting to the manual entry website.  The link
is http://fundamentals.dev.corp.enron.com/admin/manualentry/

Socal Manual Entry is the correct pipeline to choose (a slight change from
Socal).  Also, we need to start entering the Clay basin numbers under the
Questar Manual Entry pipeline, however, Chris Hyde is working to set up the
page so that a delivery and a receipt value can be entered.

Mat


The stuff is being delivered in accordance with the notice provision of the
letter agreements, which means the  original goes to "President".  A copy is
also being delivered to George, so he would be a good one to make
distribution at Intergen.

Kay

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
01/08/2001 05:48 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

Who at Intergen are the agreements being delivered to?

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/08/2001 05:35 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

I had Ozzie sign it, and it has been sent to Carolyn.

Kay

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
01/08/2001 05:32 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

I'm happy doing it, or Fred can sign.

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/08/2001 03:41 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

Do you want to print, sign and fax, or shall I take to Janet or someone else
to sign?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 03:37
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/08/2001 03:30:43 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

 <<2TCV01!.DOC>>
Kay:

Per your request, enclosed is a proposed letter to SEL enclosing the final
facility agreements.  I have included a "receipt acknowledged" signature in
the proposed letter, although I believe this is optional as long as our
courier, upon delivery, obtains a signature acknowledging receipt.  Please
advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 131359v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2TCV01!.DOC


Mike Driscoll will be responding to pricing and doing EOL and curves.


[IMAGE]

Registertoday at Worldenergyonline and receive $300 off any of The Center for
Business Intelligence's (CBI)?Energy Conferences.?

?[IMAGE]

?Find the Following and much more at Worldenergyonline:

[IMAGE]

All new?products from the Tata Energy Research Institute?are now available
including:

TERIInformation Digest on Energy
and
Pacific and Asian Journal of? Energy
Click to view description

********You Will Also Find********

Energy related reports and materialsfrom leading publishers in the energy
industry like:

?[IMAGE]?and ? [IMAGE]

Plus

?Restructuring Today's
Top CEO Interviewsof 2000:? A collection of the views, insights and plans of
some of the most important leaders of America's newest and largest industry
-- the converging energy and communications market

?Comprehensive information regarding energy events

?Job section with free job postings and a NEWPost Resume feature

?Linksto your favorite energy sites, publications, and associations

?

?To unsubscribe to this newsletter please send a message to
info@worldenergyonline.comwith unsubscribe in the subject line

?Worldenergyonline: http://www.worldenergyonline.com

?

If you received this e-mail in error or would like to be removed,  PLEASE
CLICK HERE
0000468663


Wine@Haas has sent you an Evite Invite!

To view your Invite, simply click the following Web address:
http://www.evite.com/r?iid=HECGTWTSXRHAZHKGNBYM

This Evite Invite is covered by Evite's privacy policy*.
To view this privacy policy, click here:
http://www.evite.com/privacy

********************************
Don't forget your Mom -- Plan your Mother's Day!
http://www.evite.com/compose?type=Mothers_Day&li=bgt

Need some help?  See below!
*********************************

Perhaps your E-mail program doesn't recognize the Web address as an active
link.  No problem!  You can copy and paste the Web address into your Web
browser.

Here are instructions on how to copy and paste:
a. With your mouse, highlight the *entire* Web address above
b. Select the EDIT menu and choose COPY
c. Go to your Web browser and *click inside* the window where
you normally type a Web address to visit
d. Select the EDIT menu and choose PASTE
e. Now hit ENTER on your keyboard to take you to the Web address

It's that easy! :-)

If you would like further assistance, we're happy to help - please send
E-mail to support@evite.com

* Updated 01/09/01.


It's a funny joke, but obviously not written by a married guy!

DG

Dawn C Kenne
02/09/2001 12:45 PM
To: krlsmom@hotmail.com, PMDESMAR@earthlink.net, maxnbev@wesnet.com (Max
Fledderjohann), "garynkay" <GARYWGARRETT@email.msn.com>, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, kristi.giron@cfisd.net, HeightsHappy@aol.com @ ENRON, "B.
Kenne" <yona_edoda@yahoo.com> @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: FW: Golf joke

---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001 12:48
PM ---------------------------

"Bythewood, Richard" <rbythewood@txi.com> on 02/09/2001 12:27:27 PM
To: "'Dawn Wilson'" <Dawn.C.Kenne@enron.com>, "'Gary Wilson'"
<gary.wilson@oracle.com>, "'John Everett'"  <john_b_everett@email.mobil.com>,
"'Kristin and Darrell Herbel'"  <KUAlums@aol.com>, "'Mike'"
<mike@bythewood.com>, "'Shelly'"  <rbwood@ix.netcom.com>,
"'mbythewood@scholtzskys.com'"  <mbythewood@scholtzskys.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Golf joke

A husband and wife want to take golf lessons from a pro at a local country
club. The man and woman meet the pro and head onto the driving range. The
man goes up to hit first. He swings and hits the ball 100 yards. The golf
pro says not bad. Golfpro: "Now hold the club as firm as you hold your
wife's breasts". The man follows instructions and hits the ball 300 yards.
The golf pro says "Excellent!" Now the woman takes her turn. Her ball goes
30 yards. Golfpro: "Not bad, try holding the club like you hold your
husbands penis." She swings and the ball goes 10 yards. Golfpro: "Not bad,
but now try taking the club out of your mouth and hit the ball."


Not yet, still trying to be creative in what I send.

Why don't you email me with the info you need.

Clayton Vernon@ENRON
02/29/2000 04:14 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HMM

Chris-

Yes; I'm just "saving" myself to ask you to help me collect some telephone
numbers at the pipelines.

Clay

PS Did you send an email, virtuoso :)


Attached is a list containing the new MG counterparties.  You can see it by
clicking on the second tab at the bottom of the Excel spreadsheet  where it
says "MG New Cpys".  Ignore the first tab.  I am told by London Legal that
our deadline for responding to this list is Monday.

Bandwidth team, in talking to London Legal, per my current understanding, the
only two jurisdictions approved to trade bandwidth are the US and UK.  We've
got Japan and Bermuda approved to trade US segment only.  So unless we hear
otherwise from you, it is our intention to give all the other counterparties
"read only" access.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000 11:09 AM -----

	Edmund Cooper
	06/29/2000 11:04 AM

		 To: Lara Fields/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Metals counterparties approval

Herewith revised approval list.

Tana will revert with an update on US counterparties some of which will need
to be switched to read-only.

Thanks,

Edmund


FYI.  Status of the proposed joint analysis.

    Britt
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/07/2000 08:05 AM -----

	Eric Tan@ECT
	08/07/2000 02:10 AM

		 To: "Clifford Bennett" <minton@singnet.com.sg>, Richard
Slovenski/SIN/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Victor Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Carol Chew/SIN/ECT@ECT, ngregson@wfw.com, Michael J Gasper/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
H Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Philips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Graham Cane/LON/ECT@ECT,
Wietze Dingeldein/LON/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
David.best@clyde.co.uk, Paul Henking/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: PACIFIC VIRGO - Elang Crude - B/L 21 June 2000 - Joint Analaysis

For your info.  The samples from SGS Philippines will be arriving Singapore
this week and intention is to hold a joint anlaysis asap - likely middle of
next week.

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Tan/SIN/ECT on 07/08/2000 15:06
---------------------------

Eric Tan
07/08/2000 15:04
To: "John Dwane"<tankers@ssysin.com.sg>
cc:
Subject: Re: PACIFIC VIRGO - Elang Crude - B/L 21 June 2000

To:  SSY, Singapore

 Attn:  John Dwane / Chris Twiss / Leo / Helen Cheo

Please convey to Owners of Pacific Virgo that we will be arranging a joint
analysis of the Elang cargo in Singapore sometime middle of next week.  We
will revert with details as soon as the samples (from Philippines) arrive
Singapore in the next couple of days.  Meantime, we nominate SGS Singapore to
conduct the analysis and would appreciate your agreement.

Thanks.

Regards
Eric


Hi!

         How are you?  I wanted to call you this week-end but I had such a
bad one that I never had time.  First, I made a mistake at work that caused
several people to have to work extra time on Saturday so I was on the phone
with them all day ( I felt bad).   Sunday we went to brunch at Pappasitos and
I left my retainer wrapped in a napkin on the table  -  so it cost me $800.00
to replace - I was so mad at myself (you know how cheap I am).  I was off
Monday & Tuesday and had four doctors appointments so that was fun.  I
finally got my bookcases cleaned (there were spider webs all over them) and
my Halloween decorations that Mom made me up.  My house looks really nice (to
nice for us actually).  We finally got our chandelier for the dining room -
it is so beautiful.  I made reservations for Thankgiving and was sad when Don
told me this week-end that they are not planning on coming home because Lynn
has to work.  I hope we can stay with you as I understand Carla & Russ are
not doing well.  Maybe we can eat at the Rose - just  you & me.  Well better
go.  Love you and take care of yourself.


Team,

Pleas note that there is a new schedule for December.  You may find it in the real time schedule notebook.  If you have any questions or concerns you may either trade with one another or talk to Bill for a remedy.

Thanks,
Bert


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 03:02 PM
---------------------------

"Conrad Neal" <cneal@bluegate.com> on 09/15/2000 04:12:16 PM
Please respond to <cneal@bluegate.com>
To: "'Neal, Scott'" <sneal@enron.com>, "'Neal, Todd'" <todd.neal@chron.com>,
"'Neal, John'" <muddywaters@hubserv.com>, "'Neal, William'"
<billnealmd@hotmail.com>, "'Neal, Chris'" <chrisn@thisco.com>, "'Neal, Eric'"
<ericn@thisco.com>
cc:
Subject: Me and Willis Tree Farm

Just wanted to let everyone know I started a new job last Friday:
    Pipeline Power Partners
    10000 Memorial Drive, Suite 200
    Houston, Texas 77024
    713-290-8762
I'm back working on compressor stations and gas storage projects with some
of the guys I worked with on the Columbia Gas Compressor station in '93-'94.
Note new email address also.

Barry called me last week about the well pump. It was not working and he had
tried everything he knew to do. We decided to call Western Water Well
Service in Conroe to check it out. Bottom line-it was beyond repair and we
had to replace at a cost of $765.52. When our tenant at the time took it
upon himself to dig a new well ($1500) he had them put in a real cheap
pump-so that's why it went out in a relatively short period of time. We now
have only $90 in the account so everyone needs to think about making a
contribution sometime soon. If you have a question, please call.

Conrad

 - winmail.dat


The Corporate Internal Communications team would like to thank each of the 5,142 employees who took the time to complete our survey.  As promised, here are the numerical results.  We will cover the survey in its entirety - including some of your individual comments and the steps we're taking to enhance our programs - in the August issue of Enron Business.  Watch for it!

Survey respondent demographics:

Houston office	54.4%
U.S. Domestic, non-Houston	24.9%
International office	20.7%

Do you believe Enron's corporate internal communications programs (eBiz, eThink, Enron Business, ETV, floor meetings, etc.) are generally effective and useful?

Yes	83.3%
No	16.7%

Do you believe the information you receive in eBiz, Enron Business, eSpeak, ETV and at employee meetings is credible?

Yes	90.9%
No	9.1%

Have you ever used the following tools as an information or research resource?  (Check all that apply.)

eBiz	43.2%
Enron Business		34.2%
eSpeak transcripts	23.5%

Do you read eBiz (Enron's corporate online informal news source)?

Yes	64.7%
No	35.3%

If yes, which of the following eBiz features do you read?  (Check all that apply.)

Business articles	58.3%
In Layman's Terms	35.2%
Short Cuts	32.9%
The Last Word	31.2%

If no, I don't read eBiz because:

I don't have time	66.1%
I get my Enron information from other sources	30.9%
I don't find the content credible	3.1%

eBiz is posted fortnightly - every two weeks.  How frequently would you like to get eBiz?

Monthly	26.9%
Every two weeks (as is)	58.0%
Weekly	11.5%
Daily (email format)	3.6%

How do you generally read Enron Business (Enron's all-employee print and online in-depth publication)?

Print	39.7%
Online	23.4%
Both	12.9%

If you read Enron Business, what do you think of the new design?

Like it	94.7%
Don't like it	5.3%

Do you ever share the print version of Enron Business with your spouse or family?

Yes	43.4%
No	56.6%

Which of the following Enron Business features do you read?  (Check all that apply.)

Business articles	63.6%
The Insider		41.1%
Extreme Enron		38.5%
Community stories	38.2%
Generally Speaking?	36.3%
Back page (contests)	32.6%

Which of these eThink tools do you use?

eSpeak	31.2%
eMeet	4.2%
The ThinkBank	7.7%

What speakers would you like to see featured on eSpeak?  (Check all that apply.)

Ken Lay/Jeff Skilling	52.8%
Business unit CEOs	52.2%
Subject matter experts	55.6%
External speakers	37.2%

How many all-employee meetings have you attended (or watched via IPTV or video teleconference) in the last year?

0	32.5%
1	36.6%
2	30.9%

If you have attended an all-employee meeting, did you find it to be informative and beneficial?

Yes	86.6%
No	13.4%

Do you think all-employee meetings should be held more than twice a year?  (i.e., quarterly)?

Yes	44.6%
No	55.4%

What information do you want covered at an all-employee meeting?  (Check all that apply.)

Business strategy	78.7%
Financial and operating results	69.1%
Human Resource issues	55.4%
Competitor information	49.6%

For Houston office only:
Irrespective of technical problems, what do you think of ETV (elevator television) as a communication medium?

Like it	90.9%
Don't like it	9.1%

Would you use ETV to advertise one of your Enron projects or campaigns?

Yes	69.6%
No	30.4%

If you have used ETV to advertise, did you find it effective?

Yes	9.1%
No	3.3%
Haven't used it	87.6%

Which ETV segments do you like?  (Check all that apply.)

Enron announcements	39.4%
Streaming cable news	34.8%
Rebroadcast interviews with Ken and/or Jeff with CNN, CNBC, Bloomberg, etc.	32.5%
The Building Guy	29.8%
Vision & Values ads	13.8%


deals 151877 and 151878


Harry - Here is the update that you submitted for last month.  I do not anticipate that there will be too many changes or additions for the November report, but I would like you to look it over just in case.  Would it be possible to meet in the next few days - or even Monday, and discuss any changes or ongoings that I should report to Jim?

Thanks,
Bryan
x52430


Was originally scheduled for Wednesday, February 21 at 2:00-3:00 p.m.  (Terri
x33565)


Contract 05591 was suspended at 11/30/2001 13:38:04

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


The original schedule was 50 MW's TEP GEN @PV(EPE XCHANGE) - EPMI -
SRP-MIRANT-CISO(T)PVD/SP15.  Mirant was cut by the CISO 25 mw HE 1-6,   8 mw
HE 23, and  25 mw HE 24.  Please refer to Mirant tag #3316 for this revised
schedule.   Mirant owes us a sink for 25mw HE 1-6, 8mw HE 23, and 25mw HE 24
and has decided to provide the sink on a real-time basis.   Please check with
Mirant to assure they have a sink for these hours.   Please check out with
TEP when you are aware of the new sink.

Thanks
Stacy


Hi Dave,

I was wondering if you have had a chance to look over the draft facility
agreement? We would like to make some progress on the form this week.  In
fact, you may hear (or have heard) directly from Dale Rasmussen, who is an
Enron lawyer supporting one of the projects at issue.

There are also some change order type changes which need to be captured in
words and made a part of the individual facility agreements, or integrated as
changes to these agreements.

Thanks for your assistance,

Kay


Attached are SUB's Data Responses to the Direct Service Industrial
Customer's Data Requests.  These are sent electronically via e-mail due to
potential problems with the Discovery site.

  <<Data Response DS_SP_001.doc>>  <<Data Response DS_SP_002.doc>>
<<Aluminum Study Summary.pdf>>  <<Data_Response_DS_SP_001.xls>>

 - Data Response DS_SP_001.doc
 - Data Response DS_SP_002.doc
 - Aluminum Study Summary.pdf
 - Data_Response_DS_SP_001.xls


dinner this week?  i'm free mon-wed


Careers        |      Homes        |      Autos        |       Yellow Pages   '); document.write(''); document.write(' '); document.write(''); document.write(''); document.write('');    Friday, June 08, 2001

	   ABOUT US/HELP    ARCHIVES    BOOKS    BUSINESS    CLASSIFIEDS    COLUMNISTS    COMMUNITY    DISCUSSION    E-MAIL US    ENTERTAINMENT    FOOD/DINING    LIFESTYLES    NEWS    NEWSLETTERS    OBITUARIES    OPINION    SHOPPING    SPECIAL SECTIONS    SPORTS    - Avalanche    - Broncos    - Colleges    - Columns    - Discussions    - Golf    - Motor Sports    - Nuggets    - Olympics    - Other Sports    - Preps    - Rapids    - Recreation    - Rockies    - Scores    - Women's Sports    TRAVEL    WEATHER    DPO HOME      SEARCH DPO:  Enter search term, hit return key  Click here foradvanced search     	 Testimony tabs Davis  A former manager of Atlanta's hottest strip club dropped more names of famous athletes Tuesday, testifying his boss arranged for dancers to have sex with Terrell Davis and Dennis Rodman.  story, 6/6    Bears courting Sundquist  Ted Sundquist, the Denver Broncos' director of collegiate scouting, had a second interview with Chicago Bears officials Sunday and is considered one of three finalists for the job as VP and GM.  story, 6/5    Griese leads quarterback shuffle     The Denver Post's Broncos writer takes your questions each week and responds to the pick of the litter in "Adam Schefter's Broncos Mailbag." Check out the first of two summer installments as Adam tackles questions ranging from the silly to the scintillating, including several about the QB situtaion. mailbag, 5/24    Denver signs QB Beuerlein  story, 5/31    Broncos fancying Coleman  notes, 5/30     6/8/2001 6:09:07 AM   AROUND THE NFL Chiefs ink Cadrez to one-year deal  Glenn Cadrez was released by the Denver Broncos last month, two days before he was due a $200,000 roster bonus. He led Denver with 97 tackles in 1998. He was second on the team with 105 tackles in 1999.  story   - From the wire: AP  | Sports Network       Broncos Mailbag  - Griese leads QB shuffle   - Get thee to Greeley   - AFC West toughens up   - That's news to me, C.A.   - Don't count on 3-4        View Previous Articles  Select an EditionThursday, June 07, 2001Wednesday, June 06, 2001Tuesday, June 05, 2001Monday, June 04, 2001Sunday, June 03, 2001Saturday, June 02, 2001Friday, June 01, 2001Last Seven Days    All contents Copyright 2001 The Denver Post or other copyright holders. All rights reserved.  This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed for any commercial purpose. Terms of use | Privacy policy      Go to Section DPO A to ZAbout Us/HelpAccess Magazine - BusinessAdam Schefter - ColumnsAl Knight - ColumnistsAl Lewis - ColumnistsAndrew Cohen - ColumnistsAngela Cortez - ColumnistsAP MoneyWire - BusinessArchivesAstronomy - WeatherAvalanche - SportsAvsEmailBeltway Notebook - ColumnsBest Bets - EntertainmentBill Husted - ColumnistsBillie Stanton - ColumnistsBob Ewegen - ColumnistsBooksBreaking News - NewsBret Saunders - ColumnistsBroncos - SportsBroncos Mailbag - BroncosBusinessCalendars - EntertainmentCaroline Schomp - ColumnistsCate Terwilliger - ColumnistsCensus - NewsChapter One - BooksCharity solicitations - NewsCharlie Meyers - ColumnsChuck Green - Columns ClassifiedsColleges - SportsColo. Journal - LifestylesColo. KidsColorado Voices - ColumnistsColumbine - NewsColumnistsColumnists - Food/DiningColumnists - BusinessColumnists - LifestylesColumnists - OpinionColumnists - EntertainmentColumns - NewsColumns - SportsComics - EntertainmentCommunityCompass - ColumnistsComputing - BusinessConfluence Park - LifestylesContestsCritics' Choice - ColumnistsCSAP Tests - NewsDave Barry - ColumnistsDavid Thomas - ColumnistsDeals of the Week - ColumnistsDenver & The WestDiane Carman - ColumnsDick Kreck - ColumnistsDiscussionDiscussions - SportsDPO HomeDr. Wine - Columnists E-Mail UsEd Quillen - ColumnistsEntertainmentEreo's Story - BusinessField of Genes - NewsFood/DiningFred Brown - ColumnistsFuneral notices - ObituariesGail Schoettler - ColumnistsGardening - LifestylesGlenn Giffin - ColumnistsGlenn Guzzo - ColumnistsGolf - SportsGrowth! - NewsGuest Commentary - ColumnistsHealth - LifestylesHigh school of the week - PrepsHoroscopes - LifestylesI-25 Project - NewsInns for the Night - TravelInternat'l Business - BusinessInternships - About Us/HelpIrv Moss - ColumnsJim Armstrong - ColumnsJoanne Davidson - ColumnistsJoanne Ditmer - ColumnistsJoanne Ostrow - ColumnistsJohn Henderson - ColumnsJohn Meyer - ColumnsJonBenet - News Kat Valentine - ColumnistsKelly Pate - ColumnistsKristen Browning-Blas - ColumnistsLegislature - NewsLife Voices - ColumnistsLifestylesLotteryLottery - NewsMarc J. Spears - ColumnsMark Kiszla - ColumnsMcVeigh Execution - NewsMichael Booth - ColumnistsMike Keefe - ColumnistsMike Klis - ColumnsMotor Sports - SportsMovie Mania - ColumnistsMovie Reviews - EntertainmentMovie Times - EntertainmentMr. Beer - ColumnistsNeil Devlin - ColumnsNewsNewslettersNIENuggets - SportsObituariesOlympics - SportsOpinionOther Sports - SportsP.M. UpdatePenelope Purdy - ColumnistsPerspectiv! e - OpinionPeter G. Chronis - Columnists PhotosPolitics - NewsPrep Stats - PrepsPreps - SportsPrivacy PolicyRanger - NewsRapids - SportsRecipes - Food/DiningRecreation - SportsReggie Rivers - ColumnistsRestaurants - Food/DiningReviews - BooksRock Talk - ColumnistsRockies - SportsSandra Dillard - ColumnistsScores - SportsScott Willoughby - ColumnsSean Kelly - ColumnistsSeller Beware - NewsShoppingSilver Plume - NewsSmog Report - NewsSnow Sports - SportsSound Check - ColumnistsSpecial SectionsSportsStadium - NewsStanley Cup Finals - AvalancheStock Quotes - BusinessStreet Smarts - Co! lumnistsSue O'Brien - Columnists Summer calendar - EntertainmentSunday Lifestyles - LifestylesSuzanne Brown - Fashion - ColumnistsTech Town - ColumnistsTerms of UseTerry Frei - ColumnsTestSectionThe Dish - ColumnistsTina Griego - ColumnsTom Kensler - ColumnsTravelTravel Notes - TravelTV Listings - EntertainmentUSAWeekend - LifestylesValkyries - SportsWall St. Journal - BusinessWar Stories - NewsWeatherWomen's Sports - SportsWoody Paige - ColumnsWorld/Nation - NewsWrite for us - OpinionWriters on Range - Columnists 	 		  FEATURES  - 2000 Results    THE WIRE  - News from AP   - Breaking news    YOUR VOICE  - Live chat   - Join the forum    MAILBAG  - Read the latest   - Pose question    WORDS WITH  - 2000 wrap-up    COLUMNS  - Adam Schefter    NEW STADIUM  - Webcam   - DPO coverage        (requires Flash)    COMMUNITY  - Fan sites     denver broncos.com   - Roster   - Depth Chart   - Transactions     NFL.com  - Main page   - Rosters   - TV & Radio    Ticket Exchange

 E-Mail services provided by       You are subscribed to The Denver Post Online as matthew.lenhart@enron.com Change your preferences , add or delete newsletters , or unsubscribe


Thanks, Jim.  I hope your schedule clears up and you can be there, but I
understand if you can't.

On the Tech Law front, so far we have acceptances for the November 2
meeting from Tom Klitgaard, Joe Sims, Larry Lyles (meeting only), Joe
Hubach (reception/dinner only), (you, me and David Ellwanger).

Tom Green is unable to attend, as is Anne McNamara (who wrote:  "David,
with a group this small, perhaps you could check dates before setting
the meeting.  Just a thought.").

I've not yet heard from Coggins, Hu, Kryder or Whitaker.

I'll update this RSVP report next week.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: James.Derrick@enron.com [mailto:James.Derrick@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 4:28 PM
To: David Winn
Cc: Stephanie.Harris@enron.com
Subject: RE: Special Executive Committee Meeting, October 19 in Houston

David, as of now, it appears that I will not be in Houston on Friday.  I
wil let you know if my plans change.  All the best. Jim

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "David Winn" <dwinn@swlegal.org>@ENRON
   Sent:   Friday, October 12, 2001 4:09 PM
   To:     Bradford G Keithley (E-mail); Buford P Berry (E-mail); James
C.
             T. Hardwick (E-mail); Derrick Jr., James; James L Armour
             (E-mail); Janice Hartrick (E-mail); John B Holden (E-mail);
             John E Lynch (E-mail); John S Lowe (E-mail); Mark D
             Christiansen (E-mail); Plaeger, F.J. \"Rick\" (E-mail);
Sheila
             S Hollis (E-mail); Stuart C Hollimon (E-mail); Theodore M
             Frois (E-mail); Timothy T West (E-mail)
   Cc:     Prof. Patrick H Martin (E-mail); J. David Ellwanger; Mark
Smith;
             David Winn
   Subject:  Special Executive Committee Meeting, October 19 in Houston

   TO:          The Members of the Executive Committee and Subcommittee
   Chairs
                       of the International Oil and Gas Educational
Center

   FROM:     Pat Martin, Chair

   RE:          Special Executive Committee Meeting on Friday, October
19,
   2001
                   12:00 p.m.
                   Strasburger & Price, 32nd floor, Chevron Tower, 1301
   McKinney in downtown Houston

       This is your reminder of our special meeting next Friday to
continue
   our long-range planning and restructuring of the IOGEC as we expand
our
   scope and membership to include new fields of energy law.  A number
of
   the issues left on the table at our mid-year meeting in August should
be
   resolved now as we get ready for the annual Institute in February and
   begin a concurrent membership drive.  Lunch will be served.  As we
have
   much to discuss, the meeting may run to 4:00 or so.

       If you have not yet advised David Winn whether you will attend,
   please do so now ( dwinn@swlegal.org <mailto:dwinn@swlegal.org> ;
   972-664-3488).

           An agenda will be sent to you next week in advance of the
   meeting. Thanks again for your wisdom and your leadership.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I'd suggest keeping the distinction b/w what the membership is doing ("our
members are investing ...") and what IEP is doing.  There's a couple of
lines that muddle the distinction and make it sound like the association is
building things.  ABB

Andrew B. Brown
Ellison, Schneider & Harris, LLP
2015 H Street
Sacramento, CA  95814
Phone: (916) 447-2166
Fax: (916) 447-3512
mailto:abb@eslawfirm.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This communication and any accompanying document(s)
are confidential and privileged.  They are intended for the sole use of the
addressee.  If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.  Moreover, any such
inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
privilege as to this communication or otherwise.  If you have received this
communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 6:01 PM
To: Theo Pahos; Roger Pelote; Andy Brown; B Brown Andy; Baker Carolyn;
Bob Escalante; Bob Weisenmiller; Curtis Kebler; Douglas Kerner; Greg
Blue; Jan Smutny-Jones; Jean Munoz; Jeff Dasovich; Joe Ronan; John
Larrea; John Stout; Julee Malinowski-Ball; Kassandra Gough; Katie
Kaplan; kent Palmerton; Kristin Vellandi; Lynn Lednicky; Marty Wilson;
McNally Ray; 'Nam Nguyen'; Norton Kelli; Paula Hall-Collins; Pigott
Jack; Richard Hyde; Rob Lamkin; Stephanie-Newell; Sue Mara; Tom Ross
Cc: Susan Mccabe; Scott Govenar; Ron Tom; Robert Ross; Phil Isenberg;
Mike Monagan; Maureen OHaren; marie moretti; Hedy Govenar; DJ Smith;
Delany Hunter; Chuck Cole; Anne Kelly
Subject: IEP Ad Copy for March California Journal

Greetings:
In all of the craziness this morning with getting items out I neglected to
attach the below Ad copy for the March California Journal.  This is just the
copy and as soon as it is approved we will send out the full ad copy with
graphics.  Please review this and keeping with our 48-hour review period
please send any comments back to me by 9:00 a.m. PST on Thursday, January
25, 2001. Thank you for taking the time to review this.  Please let me know
if you have any questions.

Under Construction  [headline]

No major power plants have been built in California for the past ten years.
While population has increased 16% and the peak demand for electricity has
Surged 15% (33% in Silicon Valley), power generation has inched up only 2%.

But things are changing.

Our member companies have already invested billions of dollars to buy and
modernize California's vintage power plants, many of which date back to the
Korean War. We're spending billions more to build new plants. (Six are
already under construction. Three more have been approved.  Eleven more are
under review.)

Instead of risking tax money, we're using private-sector dollars to build
and run our plants - to power California's economy into the future with
clean, reliable and affordable electricity.

We're part of the solution.

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


Best Regards,

Nicole Hunter
Clickpaper Support Team
713-345-8438


ok

William Gehle Jr@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/21/2001 09:22 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Bravo

Yes... I should touch base with Lisa.. Thanks,

Let's have a happy hour one of these days to celebrate Carlos' move, Eric's
departure, and life in general!

Kay Mann@ENRON
02/21/2001 09:05 AM
To: William Gehle Jr/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Bravo

I haven't worked with any workout folks.  Do you know Lisa Mellencamp (in ENA
Legal)?  She isn't in that area any more, but she used to be.  She might know
the players.

Kay

William Gehle Jr@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/21/2001 08:58 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Bravo

Thanks very much Kay!

It certainly was a challenge.. it was great to have the moral support from
you and others in Legal and Finance!

Now I need to determine what to do for an encore... know of any good
(corporate finance) workout positions?

Best to you,

Chip

Kay Mann@ENRON
02/21/2001 08:53 AM
To: William Gehle Jr/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph T
Grajewski/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Bravo

Congratulations on your promotions, which demonstrate that ethical standards
(coupled with stubborness) deserve to be  rewarded!

Kay


The report named: EMW P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=32&report_name=EMW+P/L&category_cd=9&category_name=EMW&toc_hide=1&sTV1=9&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/16/2001>, published as of 11/16/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


November 14, 2001
On November 11, a fire destroyed the Gerber Compressor Station building on the Redwood Path, and that unit was taken out of service. Pipeline capacity on Redwood Path is reduced to 1,776 MMcf pending station repairs. California Gas Transmission estimates this capacity reduction will last approximately six months.


Mtg w/ Jeannie Mandelker EB 47112


Thank you to everyone who participated in the XMS Web Expense Report
contest.  We had over 1000 responses with 906 correct answers.  Randy Klug of
EBS in Portland was the winner.  Congratulations, Randy, and thank you all
for participating.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 02:02 PM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
01/30/2001 02:38 PM
To: scott.miller@ferc.fed.us
cc:
Subject: ISO problems

At your request, here's a write-up of our problems with the ISO.

Issue 1 - Concerning the intertie going North out of California into the
Northwest (NW) at the California Oregon Border (COB), since about the 24th of
January, the ISO has started telling market participants that the available
transmission capacity, which is usually 2300 MW, is zero.  Last Friday, this
caused prices to increase at the Mid-Columbia (NW trading hub) by about
$50-75, costing the NW wholesale market an estimated $2-5 million per day.
This transmission capacity is within the ISO's control and, because capacity
is available, the ISO's actions seem to violate Order No. 888.  I also wonder
what would happen if another control area decided they were going to take
similar action.  This hurts Enron financially because we own FTRs and if
there is no congestion, we don't get paid anything.  This is like "economic"
force majeure.  The reason the ISO is listing zero ATC is that they're in a
Stage 3 Emergency and they're not offering sufficient price/credit terms to
get the power they need.  California obviously thinks its power needs are
more important than the NW's.

Issue 2 - We have transmission we are purchasing from some California munis
using transmission facilities that are not part of the Cal ISO.  The ISO
advised today that they are thinking about cutting exports from California.
We are concerned that the ISO will cut our transaction even though it uses
transmission assets and rights that are not under the ISO's control.  If our
deal were cut, it could cost us $20,000 to $100,000 per hour (we have a 125
MW deal and spreads now are $125 and they would likely blow out more if
exports were cut).   We hesitate to call the ISO and ask if they are going to
cut us because we are afraid we might suggest something that they haven't
thought of.

I'd be happy to answer any questions.  I'm at (503) 464-8862.


FYI
Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com by mail.bracepatt.com; Mon, 23 Jul 2001
15:58:33 -0500
Received: FROM inet.skadden.com BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Mon Jul 23 16:13:30
2001 -0500
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from Allegro_Inet-Message_Server by inet.skadden.com with
Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:52:00 -0400
Message-Id: <sb5c5630.035@inet.skadden.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.4.1
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:54:44 -0400
From: "Jeffrey Sherman" <JSherman@skadden.com>
To: <dshaffer@akllp.com>,<kminesinger@akllp.com>, <imoreno@BCJLaw.com>,
<rrich@bracepatt.com>, <jhmcgrew@brudergentile.com>,
<jmmarcoux@brudergentile.com>, <jab@cpuc.ca.gov>,
<daniel.collins@elpaso.com>, <greg.jones@elpaso.com>,
<judy.heineman@elpaso.com>, <mark.cook@elpaso.com>,
<jlgreene@energyadvocates.com>, <curtis.wagner@ferc.fed.us>,
<edith.gilmore@ferc.fed.us>, <marcia.hooks@ferc.fed.us>,
<martha.altamar@ferc.fed.us>, <ruby.meek@ferc.fed.us>,
<jmoriarty@fw-law.com>, <kbedwards@gkrse-law.com>, <jfagan@hewm.com>,
<PMohler@hewm.com>, <DLBeresford@HHLAW.com>, <GSterling@HHLAW.com>,
<bjost@huberlaw.com>, <dhuard@manatt.com>, <jgregg@mbolaw.com>,
<lochsenhirt@mbolaw.com>, <dmcwash@mshpc.com>, <frl3@pge.com>,
<sandrar@prestongates.com>, <GBaker@Sempra.com>, <wlansinger@Sempra.com>,
"Doug Robinson" <DROBINSO@skadden.com>, "Gerald Richman"
<GRICHMAN@skadden.com>, "Jeffrey Sherman" <JSherman@skadden.com>, "William
Scherman" <WSCHERMA@skadden.com>, <ryspeed-bost@verner.com>
Subject: RP00-241-000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_E1BB8B60.24458160"

Attached is the rebuttal testimony of Mark. T. Mitchell and cover letter
being filed today on behalf of El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. at the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission.

Hard copies are being served to all parties.

 - was1_358403_1.pdf
 - was1_357785_1.pdf


We're still getting traction from Skilling's remarks last week!

State energy crisis may imperil future of deregulation, consumer choice
By DON THOMPSON
Associated Press Writer

06/27/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

SACRAMENTO (AP) - California's energy crisis may claim a substantial victim:
deregulation itself.
"Never again will we embrace a free market - it's too expensive," Gov. Gray
Davis' chief energy adviser, S. David Freeman, predicted Wednesday.
"The marketplace is blind to the need for cleaner air, it is blind to the
needs of consumers in a shortage, and it produces a shortage with its
volatility," the former head of the Los Angeles and Sacramento municipal
power agencies told a Senate committee plotting California's energy future.
The state's flawed 1996 law freed wholesale electricity rates while capping
retail power prices, leaving the state's three investor-owned utilities
trapped in between.
Now the state has signed $43 billion worth of long-term energy contracts, and
created a power authority that could build its own power plants.
Its Public Utilities Commission stands ready to bar businesses from freely
swapping power providers - the incentive that prompted deregulation in the
first place.
Davis wants lawmakers to approve buying the electricity transmission lines
from two of the three cash-strapped utilities, and wants to buy the lines of
the state's largest utility, Pacific Gas and Electric, out of bankruptcy
court.
Consumer groups say the state should buy the utilities' hydroelectric
generation and other assets as well, as part of a return to regulation and a
shift to publicly owned power supplies.
"Look what deregulation and handing our electricity supply over to a bunch of
private companies has done for us - 50 percent (rate) increases and $20
billion in surcharges. Thank you very much, but no thank you," Harvey
Rosenfield of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights said last week.
He argued the state should buy all three utilities at their current
"fire-sale prices" - "We're talking about picking them up for a
dime-for-a-dollar when they're totally out of cash."
Enron Corp. President and CEO Jeffrey Skilling is among those urging the
state to do the opposite and create a truly open market. Public power only
drives up costs and lowers accountability, he said.
"If you had an open competitive marketplace and not put restrictions on that
marketplace, I guarantee you the price of power in California will be
significantly lower," he said in a San Francisco speech last week entitled,
"The arrogance of regulation."
"California needs to get deregulation right and the rest of the country needs
to get deregulation right," Skilling said, shortly after he was hit by a pie
thrown by an irate electricity consumer.
That means giving consumers more immediate price incentives, other free
marketers told the Senate Energy Committee Wednesday.
Tiered electricity rates would reward consumers who confine their electricity
use to lower, cheaper "tiers" of energy consumption.
Real-time electricity meters would let consumers see the price they are
paying at any given time of day or night, encouraging them to, say, run their
clothes dryer at 3 a.m. when power would be cheaper.
Business' demand for choice drove the deregulation movement, when industries
sought the ability to choose among energy wholesalers or generators rather
than being locked into buying their money through a local utility.
But PUC President Loretta Lynch predicted the commission will block that
choice Tuesday, for fear departing customers will leave residential and other
small consumers to pay a larger share of the $8.2 billion the state has
authorized for power buys.
The move was panned by generators and business groups as a step backward.
Southern California Edison Vice President Bob Foster predicted the state will
end up regulating all three legs of its power grid: generation, transmission
and distribution. Regulation is needed to smooth out the boom-and-bust
business cycle that California has seen so graphically in the last year, he
said.
Freeman predicted the state will likely wind up with some sort of "hybrid" of
government regulation that will rein in the excesses of a free market.
"It's impossible to say at the moment whether the (investor-owned) utilities
will revive," he warned. If they do, he said their corporate boards may opt
to chase the higher profits of the open market while shedding their
transmission and distribution systems to state control.
Yet Freeman and California Energy Commission Chairman Bill Keese predicted
residential and business consumers may soon see the sort of freedom of choice
they now could only dream about, once fuel cells, photovoltaic generation and
micro-turbines become commonplace.
"The future perhaps belongs to a whole new set of competitors," Freeman said.
"These central station power generators are not going to have it all to
themselves."

AP Photos SC108-109.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


The deal number is 815970.1 - under your name but I think that it is Eric's.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 2:24 PM
To:	Jacobson, Michael
Subject:	RE: Constellation Dispute

sure,  who is the trader listed on the deal?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jacobson, Michael
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 2:19 PM
To:	Forney, John M.
Cc:	Grace, Rebecca M.
Subject:	Constellation Dispute

JMF,

Constellation is disputing this sale we show to them in EnPower as well as the Hourly P&L.  I have nothing to give them for support, can you help me out or at least pass this along to whomever did the deal?

10/11/01 HE 23 50 mw @ $17

Thanks,
MJ


Ditto Credit.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	03/22/2001 05:34 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-22-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 05:34 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/22/2001 05:31 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-22-01

Please see attached.


Brian,

There would be more interest in Eagan as opposed to Moss Bluff.  Moss Bluff
is connected to the A/s line but the interconnect is controlled by Channel or
TPC and generally is not a reliable Firm Service point..  We have looked into
building our own interconnect in the past with a cost of around $2 million if
my memory serves me right.  At that price I would much rather have Centana
Stg Vs Moss Bluff.

I talked to Scott Neal about Eagan and he asked to be included in any
discussions.

As far as the value of the capacity that will depend on the injection rate,
storage capacity and withdrawal rate as well as what pipelines are involved.
As a general idea I would say Moss Bluff is worth between $.84 - $1.44 and
Eagan $1.20 - $2.00.  This can be further defined when Paul stops by.

The value of the information issue should be addressed to Scott Neal and Tom
Martin.

Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000 11:13
AM ---------------------------

Brian Redmond
08/09/2000 09:45 PM
To: Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Bieniawski/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Market Hub Partners

Jim,

Market Hub Partners is interested in selling the Moss Bluff and Eagan storage
facilities in addition to several properties under development.  Our initial
view is that a generator such as Calpine or AEP will bid these assets beyond
their fair value.  Nevertheless, we would like to visit the data room to
understand the commercial and operational aspects of these assets.

Three questions:
1. Are you at all interested in these assets?
2. What price would you be willing to pay for capacity in these assets say
for a (1, 3 and 5 year term).
3. Is the information value from these assets worth anything?

Paul Bienawski will stop by to brief you on the contents of the info memo we
received (summarized below).

Thanks,
Brian

    Moss Bluff Eagan
1999 Revenue   15.4  18.2
2000E Revenue   16.8  19.4

1999 EBITDA   13.4  16.3
2000E EBITDA   14.4  17.2

1999 NI    10.5  13.8
2000E NI   11.8  14.1

1999 Capacity bcf  11.3  11.4
2000 Capacity   12.0  12.0

Total Leased Capacity  10.4  8.9

Lease Termination 2000  0.5  2.165
Lease Termination 2001  3.0  3.25
Lease Termination 2002  2.4  0.3
Lease Termination 2004  0.5  0.3
Lease Termination 2006  0.0  2.0
Lease Termination 2014  4.0  0.0