Dan, Grant Oh suggested I e-mail you directly to notify you of a change
that BP needs included. BP states they need to have the volumes/contract
number information back from Enron via e-mail by 9:45am MST in order to
place nominations by 10:30am MST for the Timely Cycle. If for whatever
reason Enron cannot provide the volume/contract number information by
9:45am or Enron fails to take the scheduled volume agreed to at 9:00am; and
BP incurs any penalty costs including the price difference between the
Enron price and the replacement price, then Enron should be liable for
these costs NOT Gulf. I suggest the following options:

1) Put back in the default contract number in the Enron/Crestar agreement
as we had last week, this way if Enron fails to notify by 9:45am, then
Crestar/BP can nominate to the default contract number and Enron can change
the contract numbers internally.
2) Add a clause to either the Enron agreement or the Gulf assignment
agreement to state if Enron fails to inform and/or take, then any penalty
costs/price difference incurred by Crestar/BP shall be passed onto Enron.

Please advise what Enron's position is and how we should proceed.
------

Bruce Kohrs
Phone: (403)205-7684
Fax: (403)266-1947
e-mail:bruce_kohrs@keyspancanada.com


fyi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ordway, Chris
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Boudreaux, Shanna; Garcia, Clarissa; Lamadrid, Victor; Townsend,
Judy; Versen, Victoria
Subject: FW: TE Critical System Warning

FYI...

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: infopost@duke-energy.com [mailto:infopost@duke-energy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:00 AM
To: infopost@duke-energy.com
Subject: TE Critical System Warning

November 26, 2001

As indicated by the Critical System Warning issued November 25, 2001,
based on anticipated system operations and weather conditions, as stated
below, TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP (Texas Eastern) is requiring that
all customers take immediate and prompt steps to eliminate excess
receipts and conform scheduled receipts to actual deliveries. This
system-wide warning is issued as a result of actual receipts into the
system significantly exceeding actual deliveries. This Critical System
Warning shall remain in place until further notice.

Weather in the market area continues to be unseasonably mild and
shippers have been filling contract storage inventories in anticipation
of the coming winter heating season.  At this time, Texas Eastern's
storage capacity is approximately 98% full.  As a result, there is
virtually no storage capacity or linepack available for system
operational purposes and Texas Eastern cannot continue to absorb actual
imbalances left on the system.

Because of the critical nature of this situation and the fact that Texas
Eastern no longer has the ability to further absorb imbalances being
left on the system, Texas Eastern requests that all customers coordinate
with their suppliers the actual quantities received into the system to
match actual customer takes in the market area.  No due pipe gas will be
accepted into the system until further notice.

If immediate action does not result in reducing the current volume of
gas being left on the system, Texas Eastern may be forced to issue an
operational flow order ("OFO") requiring actual receipts of gas to match
actual deliveries out of the system, which will be subject to the OFO
non-compliance penalty of $25 per dekatherm.  In addition and as
provided for in Texas Eastern's FERC Gas Tariff, Texas Eastern will take
any other actions as may be necessary to protect the integrity of its
system, including, but not limited to, suspension of OBA's.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


Hello;

How are you today?  I talked to Alicia she is going to talk to you then provided everything is cool, which I think it is, she'll buy the tickets and I'll pay Mark.  So, I've got you covered.  What do you have going on Friday.  Want to come over to my house and play?  I'll be out the majority of the day but write me back.

Paul


I would like to help on the Nov 18 analyst super saturday also.  Jeff

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
10/17/2000 08:32 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Kuehl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Super Saturday Participation

Jeff thanks alot.  I really appreciate it.  Here are the schedule of schools:

November4th (Analysts)
Rice, UT, Baylor, Texas A&M, OU, Florida, LSU and Univ. of Houston

November 11th (Associates)
Columbia, NYU Stern, UCLA, UVA (Darden), Cornell and Vanderbilt

December 9th
Wellesley, overflow and re-schedules from previous Super Saturdays

If you don't have a preference. I would prefer that you do either November
4th or 11th.  I think that would be most beneficial.  You are certainly
welcome to do both but I didn't want to push my luck (smile). Please let me
know as soon as possible so that I can get someone else for the ones you
can't attend.

Again, thanks alot.
Charlene

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
10/17/2000 08:02 AM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Super Saturday Participation

Glad to help.  Can you get me the schedule as to which schools will be here
on those dates.

Jeff

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
10/16/2000 02:46 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Kuehl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Super Saturday Participation

Jeff,
To ensure that the business units are involved in the recruiting of top
quality candidates I am requesting your assistance in the Super Saturday that
is scheduled for either Saturday, November 4th, November 11th or December
9th.  We would like for you to participate as follows:

Be the speaker at breakfast
Interview candidates
Facilitate the decision making meeting

The breakfast is from 7:30 AM until 8:30 AM.  The speech would begin at
approximately 8:00 AM and need not be more than 15 to 20 minutes.  You would
interview approximately 4-6 candidates.  A vital part of the process is
determining which candidates will receive offers to join the Program.  We
would like for you to facilitate the decision making meeting.  The meeting
will be held in 5C2 beginning at 1:30 PM. and conclude by 3:30 PM.  We will
provide the administrative assistance.
Your assistance and input would be greatly appreciated.  Please let me know
as soon as possible of your availability.
Thanks in advance.

By the way thanks for the help you have provided with Penn at both the
graduate and undergraduate level.  It is very much appreciated.

Charlene


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outage contained within is
a
rescheduled outage. Your daily delivery will still contain this
outage.

In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted
like your daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to
load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me
know.
Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED
ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR
COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF
YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - 101201R.xls
 - OUTAGE.dbf


Sorry for the delay -- these look fine to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lees, Lisa
Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 12:19 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	Rejection Letters with Reuters Language

Mark,

I originally sent these letters for your review on July 11 after our discussion.  I don't have my "sent" email to resend to you, so I'm re-attaching the letters again below.  Your review of these is much appreciated.

Thanks.

Lisa
Lisa Lees
EnronOnline
713-853-6322

 << File: Credit Rejection Letter.doc >>  << File: Non Customer Rejection Letter.doc >>


Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
 Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
 Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and
privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
 YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer
browser, 5.0 or higher.


California,s power crisis has generated heated debate over the last several
months.  Unfortunately, this debate has generated more heat than light.  We
want you to know what the facts are and what we are doing about the crisis.
Please spend a few minutes reading the following overview on the situation
and our position on California energy issues.

What happened in California

The source of California,s current problem is as straightforward as supply
and demand.  California,s economy grew 29 percent since 1998.  This increased
the demand for electricity by 24 percent.  At the same time, regulatory
restrictions prevented new generation from getting built in the state.  So
demand grew but regulations prevented supplies from being added.  The result,
predictably, is a shortage.  This summer, peak capacity will be about 10
percent shy of peak demand, leading to further blackouts in the state.

In addition to the supply and demand imbalance, there are two other related
factors that led to the current crisis.  First, the state,s regulations
forced all sales and purchases into the spot market.  The spot market for
power is extraordinarily volatile.  The way firms behave in a free market
when faced with such volatility is to construct a portfolio of purchases long
term, medium term and short term, to reduce exposure to this volatility.  In
California, state regulation prevented this strategy.  This would be the
equivalent of putting the entire state on an adjustable rate mortgage in the
most volatile interest rate environment imaginable.  Everything was fine
while the power surplus persisted, but when shortages ensued, every megawatt
was purchased at the sky rocketing spot price.

Second, retail markets were not deregulated.  Regulated retail rates remained
in effect, and stranded cost recovery charges were structured to keep
competition out.  This meant that utilities were forced to pay high wholesale
prices in the spot market but were only able to recover costs at the
regulated retail rate.  They are now nearly bankrupt.

In short, California,s problems were caused by regulation, not deregulation.
Regulations prevented competitors from entering the market, prevented new
generation from being built, and prevented prudent hedging against volatile
spot prices.

At the time California was developing its restructuring plan, Enron warned
the state,s policy makers about these risks and proposed alternatives, which,
if adopted, would have averted the current crisis.

Enron,s Role

Many political leaders in the state have elected to fix blame rather than fix
the problem.  Power sellers, including Enron, have been vilified by the
politicians and the media.  Here are the facts:

? Other than a small amount of wind power, Enron is not a generator in the
state of California.  Every megawatt we sold in California we bought in the
same market available to other California purchasers.  Because we are a
market maker, not a generator, we are not biased toward high prices.  We are
interested only in having a market that works so that we can package products
for our customers.
? As a seller to end-use markets in the state, we provided protection from
the problems the states, utilities, and their customers, now face.  We
protected, and still protect, our customers from price volatility.

You may have read that EES recently elected to have the utilities supply
power directly to its customers in California instead of procuring power on
the open market.  Early reports mischaracterized this as a &turnback8 of our
customers to the utilities.  Here are the facts:

? As a result of a variety of factors existing in the current California
market, it made more sense for EES to source power for its customers directly
from the utilities.  This decision reduced EES,s market price risk by
allowing EES to access lower utility rates.
? EES did not terminate any customer contracts, and our customers continue to
receive the financial benefits of their contract prices.
? EES is continuing to work with its California customers to provide them
with other energy-related products and services, including assistance in
reducing the demand for power, particularly at peak times.

Enron is currently proposing solutions to help California work out of its
crisis; Enron continues to sign up customers in the state; and Enron
continues to actively manage its risks and capture opportunities in Western
power markets.  Enron,s primary business is managing risk for our customers
with solutions customized to meet their needs.  There has never been more
demand for our products and services.

The Solution

The solution to California,s crisis is also straightforward.  In summary, the
state must increase supply, reduce demand, reduce reliance on the spot market
and shore up the financial stability of the state,s utilities.

Increasing Supply

California,s process for siting and permitting new generation is nothing
short of Byzantine.  Enron has built plants elsewhere in the country in less
than a year.  In California, it often takes 5 to 7 years.  California simply
must streamline this process.  Ironically, while many of the regulations
generators must overcome are aimed at improving environmental quality, the
regulations are preventing new clean technology from coming online and
displacing current plants, which emit 40 times as much NOx.  California can
have abundant power and cleaner air by expediting the permitting of new
facilities.

Reducing Demand

Customers in California today have no incentive to reduce or shift demand.
They pay the same rate no matter what the market price is.  An open retail
market would trigger demand responses, which would balance supply and demand
at lower prices than today.  California should fully open its retail market.

Reducing Reliance on the Spot Market

In a truly deregulated market, customers would protect themselves from
volatile spot prices by purchasing some of their requirements on a longer
term, fixed-price basis.  The state has instead left procurement in the hands
of the utilities, which it has forced to buy exclusively in the spot market.
Opening the market at the retail level will give customers control over their
price risk.

Restoring the Financial Integrity of the State,s Institutions

The utilities in California are not paying their bills.  This has led to
greater uncertainty in the market, higher costs, and reduced flexibility to
arrive at lasting solutions.  California must permit its utilities to recover
their costs so they can pay their bills and invest in the transmission and
distribution assets necessary to get power from where it is to where it is
needed.

Just as important as doing these things, the state must avoid policies that,
while politically attractive, do not fix the problem or even make matters
worse.  Price caps have been proposed.  They don,t work; have never worked;
and they will not work here.  Price caps succeed only in creating shortages,
which then have to be allocated among competing users.  Imagine how
ineffectively the government would be in determining, for example, whether it
is better to make its limited power supplies available to the Imperial Valley
or Silicon Valley.  Price caps are a surefire way to make the current
shortage worse.

The state has also proposed to take over generation and transmission in
California.  There is no reason to believe, and every reason to doubt, that
the state will be more effective than free markets at investing in,
constructing, operating and maintaining assets.  This will also result in
California tax revenues being spent on power transmission and power
generation -- which the private sector can do -- instead of education, roads
and other public goods -- which the private sector cannot do.

As you are approached by people outside the company or are learning about the
crisis from the media, it,s important for you to know this:  We at Enron will
continue to serve our customers and we will continue to propose real
solutions to the state.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
06:39 PM ---------------------------

"Walkup, David C (HOUSTONAS AS 582)" <dwalkup@pclient.ml.com> on 01/10/2001
11:39:57 AM
To: "'Vincent Kaminski'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: 2000 U.S. Collective Wisdom Portfolio (http: //psm20.mlpc.privnet.
us.ml.com/logi

 <<2000 U.S. Collective Wisdom Portfolio.htm>>

____________________________________________________________

CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
be intercepted by a third party.  For your protection, avoid sending
identifying information, such as account, Social Security or card numbers to
us or others.  Further, do not send time-sensitive, action-oriented
messages, such as transaction orders, fund transfer instructions, or check
stop payments, as it is our policy not to accept such items electronicall

 - 2000 U.S. Collective Wisdom Portfolio.htm


<title>Fantasy Football Newsletter</title>

Fantasy Football Newsletter

November 16, 2001

<spacer type=block height=1 width=1>

Fantasy Sports
  Fantasy Football
  CBS SportsLine.com

<spacer type=block height=1 width=1>

Welcome to another edition of the 2001 Fantasy Football Newsletter!

The Fantasy Football newsletter will arrive in your e-mail inbox every Friday. We'll include news about the web site; tips on using all the features available; and answers to your player-related questions from the "Gridiron Guru."

Inside

• Plan for the Playoffs

• Game-by-Game Analysis

• Gridiron Guru

• Tip of the Week

Plan for the Playoffs

The Fantasy season is nearing its end, and the playoffs are
on the horizon. For Fantasy 2001 players, the playoffs begin
with NFL week 15 (games of Dec. 22-23) and last two weeks,
with the championship game in week 16 (games of Dec. 29-30.)

If you're in a Football Commissioner league, go to Schedule,
Playoffs to see when your playoffs start and how many rounds
they last. Of course, the matchups are probably still not
determined, so you may not see teams listed in the brackets.
The commissioner of your league is responsible for adding
the teams to your playoff brackets at the end of your
regular season.

If your team is still in contention, go to
NFL Teams, Schedule and take note of the NFL teams with byes
during your playoff weeks, so you know which players will be
available if - and WHEN - your team competes in a playoff
matchup.

Game-by-Game Analysis

Go to Players, Game Log to see how a particular player did
in each game this season. The player's statistics in the
common categories will be displayed for each game. If you
are breaking down free agents, the game log is great way to
see who's been getting the most consistent production.

Gridiron Guru

Welcome to Gridiron Guru, where we'll answer your questions about players and offer Fantasy Football roster advice. We invite you to send your own scouting reports and comments on players to: gridguru@commissioner.com. You'll get the chance to be heard by thousands of Fantasy players just like yourself!

Question - Mike Blake

I'm having trouble filling my No. 2 WR spot.
Should I start Az-Zahir Hakim, Todd Pinkston or Muhsin
Muhammad in week ten?

Answer - GG

Hakim is a hit-or-miss type, so he's risky. Pinkston
has done nothing in his last four games, and he's losing
playing time to Freddie Mitchell. Muhammad bounced back from
a few bad performances to catch six passes for 75 yards last
weekend against St. Louis, and has had some past success
against this week's opponent, San Francisco. Go with
Muhammad.

Question - Russell Brown

My league starts 2 QBs. Donovan McNabb is one
of my starters. Who else should I start? I have Tom Brady,
Vinny Testaverde and Doug Flutie.

Answer - GG

Testaverde's Fantasy value has taken a real hit this
season because of the Jets' conservative offense. Flutie
struggled last week against a bad Denver secondary, and
won't have an easier time against Oakland. We'd suggest
playing Brady, who will start against St. Louis despite the
return of Drew Bledsoe. Brady has thrown 11 touchdowns in
his last five games, and is playing too well to bench.

Question - Chris Gilcrest

Who would you start at QB this weekend: Rich
Gannon or Kerry Collins? Which one of these four RBs would
you bench: Eddie George, Michael Pittman, Mike Anderson,
Curtis Martin?

Answer - GG

Collins has the better matchup of the two QBs, but
he's far too inconsistent to start over a player like
Gannon. Oakland will be looking to bounce back from a subpar
performance against Seattle, so look for Gannon to have a
solid game. As for your second question, bench Mike
Anderson. You can't bench Martin, no matter how bad the
matchup may be. George has four touchdowns in his last three
games against Cincinnati, and is worth starting despite his
struggles this season; and Pittman's matchup against Detroit
is too good to ignore.

<br

Tip of the Week

Keith Simmons, Boulder, CO: Can Terrell Davis ever stay
healthy? He comes back and teases Fantasy owners with his
solid play over the last two weeks, only to fall prey to
another knee injury this past Sunday. He was once the best
Fantasy player in the league, but now Davis is an
unreliable, injury-prone shell of his former self.

This message has been sent to plucci@enron.com, provided free of charge and free of obligation. If you prefer not to receive emails of this nature please send an email to remove@commissioner.com. Do not respond to this email directly.


-----Original Message-----
From: Astramowicz, Jarek
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:46 AM
To: Cattigan, Ed; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne;
Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Cc: Glowacki, Jacek; Martin, Sophie; Hackett, Christian; Willott, Carys;
Muscroft, Brian; Parrish, Paul E.
Subject: RE: ENS - Draft Form of Acceptance

I agree with your proposal - this is probably the best we could do anyway.

I think you have done a piece of good but frustrating work there.

Jarek

-----Original Message-----
From: Cattigan, Ed
Sent: 26 November 2001 15:30
To: Astramowicz, Jarek; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley,
Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Cc: Glowacki, Jacek; Martin, Sophie; Hackett, Christian; Willott, Carys;
Muscroft, Brian; Parrish, Paul E.
Subject: FW: ENS - Draft Form of Acceptance

Good Afternoon

Attached are 2 documents in relation to final Settlement of the outstanding Delay in Start up (relating to the replacement of the previously damaged rotor) claim. One is a detailed history of the claim and the other a final acceptance notice proposed by the brokers.

I have been negotiating the outstanding portion of the claim now for nearly 9 months and believe that due to the circumstance surrounding the late delivery of the rotor and the advice of external council this settlement is acceptable to ENS. Will you please advise wether you agree with accepting this sum as full and final settlement.

In way of context this settlement is $750k of a possible $901k an 83% success on a claim we had been advised would not have been worth taking to arbitration if the insurers had become difficult.

regards

Ed

Sophie. Could you please confirm that you are happy with the wording of the acceptance notice.
NOTE I would really like to complete this by Wednesday this week as this is my last week.

-----Original Message-----
From: BODIMEADE, Alfred [mailto:ABodimeade@heathlambert.com]
Sent: 26 November 2001 10:34
To: 'Ed Cattigan'
Subject: FW: ENS - Draft Form of Acceptance

Ed
Let me know a.s.a.p. if you have any problem.
I think the figures are correct.
Alf


Stock market is exploding. Dow 11133 (up 260). Nasdaq 2150 (up 60). It has to be higher than where you bought now?

Chris


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/14/01 05:45 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/14/01 05:33 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-14-01

Please see attached.


Dave:
Just a reminder, can you send me a list of grandchildren to my products.
Also, is it possible to systems-wise deny grandchildren to a specific product
to ensure that the rule is enforced?
John


f.y.i.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000 06:03
AM ---------------------------

Kevin G Moore
01/07/2000 06:03 AM
To: Tommy Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Flat Screens

Thanks Tommy ,
The locations are correct.
EB3131B AND EB3132B.
The persons at the locations
are Trisha Tlapek and Michael Sergeev.

                                 Thanks

Also we need a computer for Roman Zadorozhny
location EB1972B.

Please inform me on this.........

                                   Kevin Moore


I got an update from Bryce.  In the back of the publication for 1/2/01(page
7), there are prices for the 30th & 31st.  It appears the 30th & 31st got pub
posted at the first page of the 1/2/01 publication.  Therefore, we are going
to see OA on these deals.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
10:11 AM ---------------------------

Phillip M Love
02/14/2001 09:59 AM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Gas Daily pricing 12/30-12/31

FYI,
I wanted to let you guys know of an OA problem that I am seeing on the
central desk for december 2000.  It appears deals that are gas daily priced
deals are being priced incorrectly in Unify.  Two gas daily publications came
out at the end of the year.  The publication on the 29th was for trans. dated
the 28th and flowing the 29th.  The next gas daily publication  came out on
the 2nd of Jan. and was for trans. 29th flowing the 1st adn 2nd.  We flashed
gas daily prices for the 30th & 31st that equalled the GD publication of the
2nd.  This is correct, we should pay sat. and sunday based on Monday's
price.  Settlements paid the 30th & 31st at the 29th's price.  I am going to
give Bryce a call, I just wanted to share this with you since you should be
seeing OA forms starting today for Dec production.  If you disagree with my
logic, please give me a shout. Thanks.
PL


I will be attending.  Mark Haedicke

-----Original Message-----
From: Cynthia Richards [mailto:CRICHARDS@isda.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:40 AM
To: ISDA BOARD
Cc: Robert Pickel
Subject: Board Meeting

Dear ISDA Board of Directors:

This is a reminder that the next meeting of the Board of Directos will be
held on Thursday, September 13, 2001 at the offices of Deutsche Bank in
London.  Please confirm you attendance at the meeting by email as soon as
possible.  The meeting agenda and materials will be sent to you shortly.
Thanks


Christine, I made a few changes for purposes of clarification.

Christine Stokes
09/12/2000 09:45 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Revised Duke Letter

Here it is.


We have received the following executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract: ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:  December 29, 2000

Enron Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:  Deutsche Bank AG

Transactions Covered: Approved for all products, including FX

Confirming Entity: Deutsche Bank AG

Calculation Agent: Deutsche Bank AG

Governing Law:  New York

Approved Branches For
Deutsche Bank:  Brussels, Frankfurt, London, New York, Paris, Singapore,
Sydney, Tokyo

Agency Relationship: Deutsche Bank AG may act as Agent for Deutsche Bank
Securities, if  they are specified as acting in such agency capacity in a
Confirmation.

PAYMENT NETTING:   Cross transaction payment netting only applies to
Commodity Transactions.  There is no payment netting for non-commodity
transactions.


Attached are the most recent numbers.


Hi!

We wanted to let you know that the greeting you sent to kimberly.soulant@wcom.com
on 11/20/2001 11:38 has just been picked up!

If you'd like to check out the greeting you sent, click on (or copy and
Paste) this link:
http://www.egreetings.com/view.pd?i=70498726&m=8222&source=eg999

If you thought that the card you sent was so cool and would like to send another one, visit us at
http://www.egreetings.com

And don't forget to stop by often, we are always updating our site with new products and great features!
http://www.egreetings.com

Don't forget, if you need help our customer service can be reached at
http://egreetings.custhelp.com/.

Thanks and come back soon!
Customer Service
Egreetings.com


ARTICLE X.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES AND ACCEPTANCE

10.1   Performance Guarantees. Seller guarantees that each Unit will meet the
Performance Standards for Electrical Output, Efficiency, Water Consumption,
Noise and Emissions as set forth in Section 10.2, when Performance Tests are
conducted in accordance with the Performance Test Procedures.

10.2  Performance Standards. Each Unit shall meet Performance Standards as
described in this Article and as set forth in the following table below in
order to achieve Acceptance:

	2MW Power Plants	2.4MW Power Plants	3.0 MW Power Plants
Electrical Output, kW	2000 kW	2400 kW
Heat Rate (LVH)	48%	48%
Water Consumption	600 gal/h	620 gal/h
Sound level	65 dB(A) at 100 feet	65 dB(A) at 100 feet
Emissions
Nox	<1 ppmv	<1 ppmv
SOx	<0.1 ppmv	<0.1 ppmv
CO	<20 ppmv	<20 ppmv
VOC	<20 ppmv	<20 ppmv
Particulates	<100 mg/m3	<100 mg/m3

10.2.1   Heat Rate Guarantee.  Seller guarantees that the Heat Rate as
measured for each of the Units
as demonstrated during the Performance Test, shall be __BTU/kWh. In the event
the Heat Rate exceeds the Minimum Heat Rate Guarantee, Seller shall take all
necessary actions to correct, retest the deficient Unit and cause the
deficient Unit to meet the Minimum Heat Rate Guarantee.  Failure to meet the
Heat Rate Guarantee shall prevent Acceptance, unless Purchaser explicitly
waives this guarantee in writing.

10.3.2   Electrical Output Guarantee.  Seller guarantees that the Electrical
Output of each Unit as demonstrated in the  most recent Performance Test
shall be equal or greater than 2000 kW (for a 2.0 MW Unit), 2400 kW (for a
2.4 MW) Unit, and 3000kW (for a 3.0 MW Unit). [Is this a net number?  Where
is it measured?]

10.3.3   Emissions Guarantee. Seller guarantees that the emissions of the
[Unit] for the above listed categories when the [Unit] is operated
[conditions?]

10.3.4   Water Consumption Guarantee.

10.3.5 [Sound Guarantee. Seller guarantees that the near field average
A-weighted sound pressure levels of the [Unit?  Facility?] shall not exceed
65dB(a) 9referenced to 20 micropascals) when measured during the Performance
Test at one and a half (1.5) meters above the ground level and one (1) meter
from the surface of the Equipment.]

10.3.6 Reliability.

10.4    Remedy for Failures to Meet Performance Guarantees.  Except as
specified in Section 10._] the failure to achieve the Performance Guarantees
by the Acceptance Deadline [to be defined] shall constitute a default under
this Agreement, and Purchaser shall have the remedies specified in Article [].

10.5   Testing.

10.5.1   Notice of Installation Completion; Conducting Tests. Seller shall
deliver Notice to Purchaser that a Unit has achieved Installation Completion
so that the Unit is ready to be tested.  Within [fourteen (14) days] of
receipt of this Notice, Purchaser shall perform the Performance Tests in
accordance with the Performance Test Procedure; however, Purchaser shall not
be required to conduct Performance Tests prior to [] days from the Delivery
Date, or date of actual delivery, whichever is latest. Purchaser shall give
Seller five (5) days notice of the time of the Performance Tests. Seller
shall be present or to have a representative present at the Performance
Tests, and shall provide technical advice during the tests; however,
Purchaser may at its option conduct the test without Seller, assuming notice
was properly given in accordance with this section.

10.5.2   Test Results. Performance Tests shall be conducted on a unit-by-unit
basis. Upon the completion of each Performance Test Purchaser will issue a
Performance Test Certificate setting forth the results achieved during such
test.  In the case of multiple Performance Tests on a Unit, performance shall
be measured by the most recent Performance Test.

10.5.3   Costs of  Retests.  If one or more additional Acceptance Tests are
required doe to the failure of a Unit to pass its Acceptance Test, Seller
will bear the additional costs (if any) incurred by Purchaser [in excess of
those costs normally associated with operating the Unit]. Such additional
costs may include, but not be limited to, cost of testing, instrumentation,
fuel, consumable spare parts, and additional personnel required to conduct
the tests.

10.6   Acceptance.  Upon the successful completion of the Performance Test
for a Unit, Seller shall submit a Performance Test Certificate to Purchaser
indicating that a Unit has achieved the Performance Standards and it ready
for Acceptance.  Purchaser shall within ten  (10) days of receipt of such
Performance Test Certificate, either sign such certificate acknowledging
concurrence or reject such certificate specifically stating the reasons for
such rejection. Acceptance for each Unit (and its associated Equipment) shall
occur upon the issuance of the Performance Test Certificate by Purchaser as a
result of the Unit having met the Performance Guarantees.  Acceptance of the
each Unit to be installed in a Facility shall occur when all of the following
have occurred:

(a) the issuance of a Performance Test Certificate by Purchaser as a result
of a Performance Test indicating that the final Unit has met the Performance
Standards;

(b) all completion of training  and the delivery of O & M Manuals and special
tools required hereunder shall have occurred;

(c) Seller has delivered to Purchaser a waiver of liens in form as shown in
Exhibit-S that have been or could have been placed upon the Equipment and
that there are no outstanding claims of Seller or any Vendor with respect to
the Equipment for that particular Facility;

(d) all of the Units in the Facility have achieved Installation Completion.
[and there are no punch list items remaining to be completed.]

10.7 Obligation to Improve Performance.  If the Performance Test should
indicate that a Unit has met the Specific Performance Guarantees but not the
Guaranteed Performance Criteria, then for a period of ninety (90) days
following the Performance Test Seller shall have the obligation to use
reasonable efforts to improve performance so that the Guaranteed  Performance
Criteria are met. Such efforts shall be at Seller,s sole cost and risk.
Performance Tests shall be conducted in accordance with this Article.

10.8    Reduced Purchase Amount for Failing to Meet Guaranteed Performance
Levels.  Should the Performance Test of a Unit demonstrate that the Unit has
met the Performance Standards except for the Electrical Output Performance
Standard, the Purchase Amount related to that Unit shall be reduced by the
percent by which the Unit fails to meet the Power Output/kW Performance
Standard, so long as the Unit has achieved ninety percent of the guaranteed
level. Seller shall within 30 days refund any prior payment received for the
Unit in excess of the reduced Purchase Amount.


I don't know what this is about.  Is this for the home computers we are
supposed to get?  If it is I actually haven't done anything about it (that I
am aware of).  If it is for the home computer thing, I probably will want to
upgrade.  Let me know...

	Gary Kane
	03/21/2001 11:16 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: e-buy order

Hi ,
 You currentley have a order in e-Buy for a PC for New Starter.You have not
ordered a Monitor for this ...is this correct?

Gary Kane
European Purchasing Team
x 34646
DDI: 0207 783 4707
FAX: 0207 783 8586


Steve -

As you requested, attached please find the Analyst compensation comparables
we discussed last week:

We are having an extremely tough time recruiting Analysts from Rice because
our main competition on campus comes from consulting companies (Bain,
McKinsey, BCG, EY, Andersen, etc.) and investment banks (Goldman, JP Morgan,
CSFB, Merrill Lynch, etc.).  Even though these companies are not directly in
our industry group, they are our principal competitors for talent at Rice.

As evidenced by our recruiting performance this year and in previous years,
we loose nearly every time when we compete with these companies.    In the
last three years of recruiting at Rice, only 1 or 2 people have accepted our
offer.  The other Analysts who are rice alumni (myself included) joined Enron
through other circumstances.

I think our poor performance at Rice is due primarily to the following
factors:

Compensation:  The Enron compensation package  is below that of our
competitors at Rice.  Additionally, there is more risk associated with our
offer, since Enron's compensation structure relies more heavily on the year
end bonus than some of our competitors.  In the cases where the package is
similar (ie, McKinsey), we loose folks because of other company's name and
prestige.
Rotations:  Most investment banks give their analysts offers to work in
specific groups (M&A, Trading, Etc.).  Our analyst recruits can express a
preference, but their placement is not guaranteed.    This also creates an
added element of risk and uncertainty.

In sum, I think we will continue to be unsuccessful in our recruiting efforts
at Rice if we do not address these issues.

Should you need any further information, please feel free to contact me.

Regards,

Alex Hernandez
ENA - Principal Investments
713-345-4059

---------------------- Forwarded by Alejandro Hernandez/NA/Enron on
12/15/2000 03:31 PM ---------------------------

Alejandro Hernandez
12/15/2000 03:30 PM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Braly/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jana
Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David
Hunker/ENRON@enronxgate, Priya Jaisinghani/NA/Enron@Enron, Carrie
Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Erin A Rice/LON/ECT@ECT, Julie Davidson/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Analyst Compensation Comparables

Charlene -

As we discussed yesterday, attached please find a comparable compensation
analysis for this year's Analyst offers:

We believe that the low acceptance rate ( 14/112 ) we are experiencing this
year is due to the following reasons:

Enron's base salary is significantly below that of our competitors
The bonus ranges were not mentioned in the offer letters

I hope this information is useful to you as we continue our efforts to
attract quality employees to Enron.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Regards,

Alex Hernandez
Analyst Advisory Board
x54059


I got the package - I just found out that Mark is out so I'm trying to get Lance to sign.  Will email you when done. Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Moore, Janice R" <jmoore@mcguirewoods.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Moore+2C+20Janice+20R+22+20+3Cjmoore+40mcguirewoods+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:53 AM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	Enron consent letter

Hi
Just wondering if you got the package I sent via FedEx last week and had had a chance to get the letters signed.
I heard that you got more reinforcements recently (Travis and Kaye), and I hope that things continue to go well there.
Regards, Janice
Janice R. Moore
McGuireWoods LLP
Washington Square, Suite 1200
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
202-857-1752; fax 202-857-1737
Richmond: 804-775-1149
jmoore@mcguirewoods.com
www.mcguirewoods.com
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, please erase this e-mail immediately without reading it or sending it to anyone else.  I would also appreciate your advising me (by return e-mail) if you have received this e-mail by mistake.  Thanks for your kind assistance.


-----Original Message-----
From: jfogg@reliantenergy.com [mailto:jfogg@reliantenergy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:44 AM
Subject: REGT Capacity Report November 14

For gas flow for Thursday November 15,  REGT has the following IT capacity:

CGT                                0          Capacity cuts to 250 Mdth/d
for Thursday
Other Hub Delivery Points including TGT     10
Tetco Bald Knob                       20           TETCO pressures have
been up and down, limiting IT.
Texas Gas Helena                      90
MRT Glendale                          20
Other Line AC points                        20
Williams Jane                         20
Carthage Delivery                     10
SBS injection space                     0          warm weather and high
line pack
SBS withdrawal space                        50
Backhaul to west                      40

There has been no update in the estimated date of return for the Delhi
compressor.  The suction bottles are due back from the factory tomorrow and
the Perryville team is planning on having them installed by late Friday,
barring any last minute gliches.   Volumes are still being held at 250,000
dth at CGT at this time.  I will let you know of any updates as soon as I
get them.  Also, REGT has the #1 unit at Malvern down for repair.  Storage
injection space remains tight due to warmer weather and high line pack left
after the tests this past weekend.

Amber Station is flowing 340 Mdth east and Line 2 South is at 112 Mdth for
today.  Be aware that REGT is not offering any general interruptible
transportation discounts from West of Amber to east delivery points.  All
IT will be priced at max rate, unless of operational benefit to REGT.  REGT
is still full along Line AD and is approaching full levels at its Oklahoma
storage facilities.

Power plants burned around the 149 Mdth/d level yesterday and are nominated
at similar levels for today.  Arkla bumped up to about 321 mdth on Monday
but no major changes are forecasted for this week.

Gas Prices     East  $2.23
          West  $2.14

 REGT Fuel - currently 1.31% plus $0.0014/dth EPC - based on above
= $0.0306/dth

I am in the office today.  You can call me at 713-207-5183 or AOL IM me at
JAFOGG for any rate quotes or questions.  However, I will only be around
till 8:45 or so this morning.  If you are looking for IT capacity after
that time, please call Marie Downing at 713-207-5194.

Thanks

JAF


Some of you have requested that I circulate my Transition Memo in advance of
the meeting on March 21. Please find it attached:


Bill, I called Shapiro about this and he said they were interested and would
cover the meeting you told me about.  I would give Rick a call at this
point.  Thanks.  Mark


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041909.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/19/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DONKEY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 09:45 AM -----

	Alan Comnes@ECT
	12/22/2000 03:46 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Charts

Use this file:  I have dated the forward price curve chart so that it is
clear it is prices as of today.

GAC

Alan Comnes
12/22/2000 01:39 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Charts

Steve, Ginger:

The first file has the charts and data you requested.

I am also forwading some charts on price caps.  You may be interested in the
charts on California Stage 1/2/3 emergencies.

Alan Comnes


This deal should be with APB, not Prebon. Trader error. I'll change this when
the calc is over - in about 45 minutes.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/17/2000 02:30 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 11-17-00 discrepancies

Mark Fischer
deal 461972
error:  Prebon does not recognize this deal.


FYI.  In case you hadn't seen it.  Interestingly, no mention of the transfer of the gas assets.
Best,
Jeff
PG&E restructuring bid draws state ire
By Dale Kasler and Carrie Peyton
Bee Staff Writers
(Published Sept. 21, 2001)

In a controversial attempt to dig its way out of bankruptcy, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. proposed a radical restructuring Thursday that would pay off its debts but end state regulation of the utility's valuable hydroelectric and nuclear plants.
To make the plan work, PG&E asked a U.S. bankruptcy judge to override state laws and regulations governing power-plant ownership -- a request that triggered immediate opposition from California officials.
PG&E said the plan, a complicated blend of asset transfers, debt refinancing and corporate spinoffs, would restore the utility's financial health and creditworthiness without requiring additional rate hikes or a state "bailout." Divorcing the utility from its parent company, the plan would pay off the entire $13.2 billion of debt PG&E accumulated during California's poorly executed era of deregulation.
The plan, filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in San Francisco, had the support of a key block of creditors, including independent energy generators, whose approval is necessary to any reorganization plan.
But it ran into immediate opposition from Gov. Gray Davis and other state officials, setting up a potentially fierce battle. Despite PG&E's claims to the contrary, they warned the plan could trigger more hikes because PG&E could charge nearly double the amount it currently charges for electricity from the hydro and nuclear plants. The proposal would have the state Public Utilities Commission relinquish control over those plants to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
FERC "has proven over the last 18 months to be ... no friend of the ratepayer," Davis told reporters Thursday. "The PUC, while far from perfect, has been a stronger advocate for ratepayers than the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ... I'm very wary of PG&E's proposal to transfer all of its generating capacity from a regulated environment to a non-regulated environment."
The PUC vowed to fight the plan in court. "I don't think the judge is going to do it," said PUC President Loretta Lynch.
Consumer advocates noted that PG&E has been pushing for years to end state regulation of its hydro plants. "It's complete piracy," said Nettie Hoge, head of The Utility Reform Network of San Francisco. "It's the most audacious thing I've ever seen."
Filed six months after the utility sought bankruptcy protection, the plan calls for PG&E to be spun off from PG&E Corp., but the utility would transfer its hydro and nuclear plants and some other assets to the parent.
That would violate a state law, passed as a response to the energy crisis, prohibiting utilities from selling any of their generating plants before 2006. The law was intended to keep electricity in California hands at a time when out-of-state generators were charging ultra-high prices to PG&E and Southern California Edison.
PG&E acknowledged the conflict with state law but said it will ask the bankruptcy court -- a federal entity -- to override the state law. Legal experts said it's not clear whether a bankruptcy judge would ignore state law, and in prior rulings U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali has sided with state officials.
"Any federal court would be very reluctant to go in and override state laws," said influential state Sen. Debra Bowen, D-Marina del Rey, chair of the Senate Energy Committee.
Robert D. Glynn Jr., PG&E's chairman, called the transfer a good deal for customers. He said the electricity from those plants would be sold back to the utility at about $50 a megawatt hour -- "the lower end" of current rates -- under a 12-year contract.
But that's almost double the existing rates for those plants, critics said.
And Gary Cohen, the PUC's general counsel, said the company would be free to charge market rates when the contract runs out, putting utility customers at the mercy of an independent, unregulated generator.
"This is more of what got us into this mess to begin with," Cohen said.
Despite the friction between PG&E and the state, the plan requires assurance from the PUC that the utility will be allowed to collect its wholesale power costs in the future from ratepayers, regardless of how high they go. Such assurance will make the utility creditworthy again and able to borrow money to fund the reorganization, PG&E said.
The plan also requires approval from federal officials and a "yes" vote from a majority of PG&E's creditors, along with Montali.
Glynn said the plan could be completed by December 2002, enabling the utility to resume buying electricity. The state has been buying power for PG&E since January, when it became insolvent.
While the PUC raised rates an average of 40 percent this year, the reorganization plan doesn't require another rate hike, Glynn insisted. "From the customers' view, this transaction will be seamless," he said. The same should be true for most employees, he said.
The PG&E chairman, whose company has feuded with Davis for months, also boasted that PG&E isn't "asking the state for a bailout or a rescue" -- a jab at Davis' as-yet-unsuccessful effort to sell the Legislature on a multibillion-dollar rescue for Edison.
It's unclear what impact PG&E's proposal would have on Edison's attempt to avoid bankruptcy. Edison's creditors, already angered that the Legislature adjourned without passing the Davis-backed plan, might conclude that Edison is better off in bankruptcy and could push the Southern California utility into court, analysts said.
The PG&E proposal involves a complicated series of property transfers and bond offerings that would leave the current PG&E Corp. split into two separate, publicly-traded companies.
The utility company, Pacific Gas and Electric, would become strictly a retailer and would sell other assets -- including its hydro and nuclear plants, transmission wires and gas pipelines -- to PG&E Corp. for $4.06 billion in cash and IOUs. PG&E Corp. shareholders would receive stock in the slimmed-down utility, although the details of the stock transaction haven't been worked out.
The bankruptcy proposal represents the fourth time in three years that PG&E has tried to remove its hydro plants from state control. The PUC and Legislature have resisted because of potential impacts on costs and the environment.
Despite the criticism, PG&E said removing those assets from regulators' oversight is essential to making the plan work. Why? Because PUC rules limit how much money the utility can borrow against those assets, said utility spokesman Ron Low. If the assets became property of PG&E Corp., the corporation could borrow a lot more money and use the proceeds to pay its debts. Glynn said he's had "in-depth discussions" with investment bankers about issuing new bonds.
Also, by removing the generating plants from PUC oversight, the plan can produce more cash for debt repayment, said credit analyst David Bodek of Standard & Poor's Corp. in New York.
If state officials fight the plan, "the question arises, 'How do you discharge these (debts)?' " Bodek said. "Here's a plan that does that."
The plan would pay creditors $9.1 billion in cash and $4.1 billion in bonds. Creditors with debts of more than $100,000 would get 60 percent in cash and 40 percent in bonds, which will be paid in 10 or more years, said Paul Aronzon, attorney for a committee of unsecured creditors.
"There's some credibility here, and it works," Aronzon said of the plan.
Gary Ackerman, a spokesman for independent generators, said his group would probably accept the plan, even if it means they have to wait years to get some of their money.
Shareholders also endorsed the plan. PG&E Corp.'s stock jumped $1.22, to $15.72, on a day when the markets took another bad fall


Please use this revised data for your EBS restructuring discussions.

The group moving to EES has been deleted from these numbers per Kevin
Hannon.  thanks

Marla Barnard (marla_barnard@enron.net)
Vice President - Human Resources
Enron Broadband Services
713-345-8158 (Office)
713-646-2678 (Fax)


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/20/2001>, published as of 11/20/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	exchangeinfo@nymex.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-exchangeinfo+40nymex+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:15 AM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	(01-309) INTRODUCTION OF BRENT; LIGHT, SWEET CRUDE OIL CALENDAR OPTIONS POSTPONED

To:
All NYMEX Division / COMEX Division Members
All Clearing Members

From:
J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

Re:
INTRODUCTION OF BRENT; LIGHT, SWEET CRUDE OIL CALENDAR OPTIONS POSTPONED

Due to recent events, the Exchange has postponed until further notice the launch of calendar spread options contracts based on Brent and light, sweet crude oil futures, originally scheduled for tomorrow.

Should you have any questions or require any further information, please contact exchangeinfo@nymex.com

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc=(01-309)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Michelle - I think Linda would fill the spot you and I talked about very
well.  Linda is the new head of our DC office; she was asst secy of treasury
under Bentsen, Rubin and Summers.  She is very well respected in
washington.  She received the Alexander Hamilton award fro Secy Summers --
the highest award presented by the US Treas dept.  She has gotten up to speed
very quickly on our issues and I think would serve the progam well (and she's
already paid for!!).
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/29/2000 05:30 PM -----

	Chris Long
	12/20/2000 10:54 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Law Conference

Linda and I made a courtesy visit to Jim Derrick last Friday.  Jim suggested
that we contact Michelle Cash about participating in the law conference on
the program.  I called Michelle to inquire about the program and she told me
that you and she had already spoken.  Linda is not seeking a place on the
program, but will be pleased to participate if our decides to make a
presentation.  Let us know how you want us to handle.

Thanks - Chris


Don,

Wanted to e-mail you what schedulers are doing what regions so your hourly guys will know for scheduling problems.

Cinergy-			Pat Hanse

TVA/SOCO/Florida/JEA-		Larry Campbell

Comed-				Ashish Mahajan

Entergy-			Gretchen Lotz

MAPP-				Matt Lorenz

PJM-				Lisa Burnett

Nepool-				Anubhav Aggarwal

I back up every region, so when in doubt, they can call me.

Thanks,

Jason


ok. i'll be there at 2pm

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Pan, Ronggen
Subject:	RE: Socal Hourly Storage Capture

um, I don't really know.  I did a search for "VB6" and did find one file.  When you get a chance, can you make the long journey across the isle to take a look.  Thanks.

Mat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pan, Ronggen
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Smith, Matt
Cc:	Tonks, Colin
Subject:	RE: Socal Hourly Storage Capture

Mat,

Do you have VB6 installed on your machine? If you have I can show you a few lines to do an experiment to see if SendKeys work with your program at all. If not, please come to my desk after 2pm.

Thanks,

Ronggen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 10:53 AM
To:	Pan, Ronggen
Subject:	Socal Hourly Storage Capture

Per our conversation yesterday, I'd like to test the send key process for obtaining the Socal hourly storage postings.  Once I get the scheduling system opened and set, the following is the keystrokes required:

Enter
Alt-F
P
Enter
Enter

Of course, a slight pause between the keystokes might be needed.  And if we need to maintain activity to keep the system from kicking us out, we can simply use two Enter keystrokes.  Please let me know when you'll be able to give this a shot.

Thanks.

Mat


everyone up here loved that


I have extended deal 151669 to cover mtr 9676 for Feb and Mar.

D

Jackie Young
03/11/2000 12:19 PM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita
Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 98-6719 and 98-9676

Robert,

I've taken care of 98-6719 (as far as getting it out of my allocation
exception screen).  I'm going to place 98-9676 on Strangers Gas until you
hear back from Daren or Julie.

Should Daren or Julie get back w/you, while I'm on vacation, please get back
w/Anita Luong and provide her with the K # given to you (by Daren or Julie)
as well as the dates of 2/1 - 2/29 (even though 3/1/2000 is reflected in my
allocation exception screen) so that she can provide you with an accounting
arrangement to place February's volumes on @ this meter.

It looks as though this meter is flowing starting 3/1/2000.  I guess that the
trader will eventually place a deal in sitara for this meter.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 03/11/2000 12:00
PM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
03/10/2000 03:22 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 98-6719 and 98-9676

I extended the deal at mtr 6719 to include 2/10.   In the future, please run
all wellhead deals through Tom Acton first.

I've got a message into Julie Meyers to look into the contract at meter 9676,
and will let you know what she determines.

D

Jackie Young
03/10/2000 10:39 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 98-6719 and 98-9676

Hi Daren,

Can you please check into whether or not the below deals for the above meters
can be rolled and extended?  If so, can you please perform this for me so
that Anita can set up an accounting arrangement for me?

98-6719  Sitara Deal #166989 Flow @ meter began on February 10th but the deal
is not effective until  February the 11th.
     No new deal # referenced and no evergreen flag.  This is on the
gathering (96026573) K which is the only
     K @ the meter.

98-9676  Sitara Deal #151669 Deal good from 1/1/00 - 1/31/00 but there is
flow for all of February 2000 with no K.  This is on the 215K      for 1/2000
production which is the only K @ the meter.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


The first quarter of 2001 was a record quarter for the performance of the
businesses under the Enron Global Markets group.  We posted a gross margin
number of $100 million for the first quarter.  This represents a 38% increase
in gross margin after a very successful Q1 of 2000.  When combined with
outstanding results posted in December of 2000, EGM has contributed over $187
million to the Wholesale group in the last 4 months.  This was due to
tremendous contributions from each business group.

In order to keep the momentum going and to facilitate more growth, the
following changes and additions have been made within the organization.

Crude and Products group
Mid-marketing
Bill Berkeland has joined the group and is responsible for creating a focused
mid-marketing function specifically within this group.  Fred Lagrasta is
responsible for mid-marketing for Enron Americas and still maintains some
responsibility for various contacts and deal flow as well.  The purpose of
this group is to be very focused in the development of crude and product
specific products and services.  This group reports to Randy Maffett.

Origination
In order to manage the increased origination opportunities around the world,
the Origination group has been changed in order to insure that the proper
focus is placed on these opportunities and to manage its wide scope.  Doug
Friedman will lead our NGL and Petchem origination efforts reporting to John
Nowlan.  Joining Doug will be Rick Cantrell recently hired from Union
Carbide.  The global crude and products origination group has added Randy O,
Conner from Red Meteor, who has extensive experience in these markets.  Both
Randy and Doug Leach,s growing fuels origination group will report to Randy
Maffett.

Trading
Lee Jackson will assume the role of U.S. NGL,s lead financial trader,
supported by Chad South.  The petchem and plastic trading businesses have
been reorganized under Stuart Bland.  Alan Engberg will be responsible for
plastics trading in the Americas.

Shipping
Scott Moncrieff will assume responsibility of our global shipping network
related to crude and products.  Scott will be charged with expanding all
aspects of the shipping portfolio taking advantage of our growing presence in
these markets and the successes we have had marketing shipping on line.

Weather
The weather group under Mark Tawney,s direction is expanding its efforts
around the world.  Europe will have an expanded focus and the London office
will focus on new opportunities in Europe.  Paul Murray has joined Enron from
Castlebridge Partners and will be moving to London to develop and expand the
continental opportunities.  Ross McIntyre, currently based in London, will
report to Paul.  Bill Windle has joined the weather group and has
responsibility for origination activities for North America.  Bill,s most
recent assignment has been in the EBS organization.  The Oslo weather office
managed by Thor Lien will have responsibility for Scandinavia weather
activities.  In addition, employees are being added in the Australia and
Japan regions.  We are now making markets in 32 cities around the world on
EnronOnline.

Coal
Mark Schroeder has joined the coal group and is responsible for origination
activities with generators in the U.S.  Mark,s most recent assignment was as
the head of all regulatory activities for Enron Europe, Japan and Australia.

Enron Japan
The momentum of power deregulation process has slowed in Japan.  The decision
has been made to scale back the wholesale power activities.   Joe Hirl,
President and CEO of Enron Japan, will now report into the EGM organization.
Joe will maintain his direct responsibility of the office and will be
increasing his focus on the business lines within EGM.  All of these products
have high growth potential in both the near and long-term and he will
coordinate and help implement with all the business lines and their
activities.

LNG
LNG continues to expand with the vision to increase the number of
transactions and create a portfolio of assets and contractual access around
the world.  Jonathan Whitehead has joined the LNG group and has
responsibility for all trading and shipping activities.

Neal Gerstandt, previously an independent energy consultant,  Jared Kaiser,
from Enron Americas - East Gas Desk, and Kurt Lindahl, from Enron Global
Assets, have also joined the LNG group with responsibilities in the area of
origination in the Western Region.

Enron Freight Markets
EFM has concluded over 2,000 transactions in its first two months.  Chris
Kravas continues to focus on building the spot trading and mid-market
capabilities that will enable it to be the dominant player in its market, and
has hired four new traders in the last two weeks.  Kellie Metcalf, from EBS,
has joined Shawn Cumberland's origination effort, and Deirdre McCaffrey, from
Gas Structuring and Mid-Market, has joined Matt Arnold's forward trading
group focusing on diesel products.

Global Risk Markets
David Hoog joined Enron from Ace Insurance in December 2000 and has quickly
built a team of people specialized in trading unit contingent power price
call options, a hybrid insurance derivative product. Drawing on Ace and Enron
resources, this team is based in New York and includes Alex Tartakovski and
Larry Marcus from Ace, as well as Joana Bekerman and Tony Chang who recently
moved to New York from Houston. Their first transaction closed just 3 months
after startup.

Brad Blesie will be moving to London in June to establish a base of operation
for GRM and expand our insurance derivative activities into the European
market place. Among the opportunities he is currently exploring are
contingent call options applied to shipping and charter rates, trading
insolvent insurance claims, and combining North Sea oil and gas VPP risk with
decommissioning insurance.

In April this year, EGM established a hedge fund origination effort in New
York reporting to Per Sekse and led by Russell Dyk who recently moved to New
York from LNG in Houston. Russell is responsible for expanding our commodity
trading relationship with hedge funds to include crude oil, products, liquids
and other commodities traded by EGM. Joining Russell in this effort is
Stephen Plauche, who comes to us from Enron Americas, power trading desk.

Financial Trading
Elsa Piekielniak has assumed responsibility for Enron,s developing
agriculture business.  Billy Lemmons has changed groups and now runs the
Analyst and Associate program for Enron Corp.

Please congratulate everyone on their new assignment and we look forward to
the continued growth in all the EGM businesses.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Gulf South Pipeline Mtg./EB4194 To discuss nominations & confirmations w/new interconnect @ Mobile Bay Gulf South attendees: Steve Gates, Jim Alred & Patrick Howard

Date:		4/17/2001
Time:		10:30 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


I think that is exactly right.  I suspect that the marketing guys could work
up a simple formula for determining our course of action depending on the
size of the revenue opportunity vs. the power cost/penalty.  Thanks. df

From: Randy Rice on 12/15/2000 07:53 AM
Sent by: Randy Rice
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron
cc: Charlie Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Gallup Rebate

Drew, I plan to discuss this with Rich Jolly, and will call you with our
thoughts. I would suggest our plan be such that we do not just aoutomatically
shut down during these periods but work with marketing to create a cost vs.
benefit profile of when/if it may make sense to operate even when in a peak
state?
R2

	Drew Fossum
	12/14/2000 05:31 PM

		 To: James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Charlie
Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Gallup Rebate

Randy, this is the issue I left you the voice mail on.  Article 6 of the
Gallup Compression Services Agreement (which I am sending to you separately)
with ECS obligates ECS to "work in good faith with CDEC" to establish an
automated system that would automatically have alerted us to peak loading
conditions on CDEC's system.  We had a pretty good idea when we signed the
contract that ECS would not be able to complete that by the contract start
date, so we negotiated a fall back plan under which ECS is obligated to
"assist [Transwestern] in developing a manual system to accomplish the same
result and will hold harmless and keep [Transwestern] whole for all cost and
expenses" associated with the manual system.  We will fight with them about
who owes the $200k that James mentions below based on their failure to
"assist" us in managing the cost.  In the mean time, we need to make sure
that we are doing everything we can to get a handle on the situation to
mitigate future costs.  Do we have someone who is watching this out there?
We are running so full tilt on TW that we may not have as much flexibiltiy to
manage this situation as we expected, but let me know what we can do.  James
had heard that one hold up was the absence of a confidentiality agreement--I
guess between ECS and Transwestern--that would permit ECS to communicate to
us the details on how to access teh key info. from CDEC.  That sounds like a
BS excuse from ECS, but it that's what they are saying, let me know and we
can figure out a solution.  Thanks.  DF

James Centilli
12/14/2000 02:49 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Gallup Rebate

Would you please contact Gerald Nemec and review the Gallup Compression
Service Contract in respect to the Load Control Management.  My understanding
was that ECS was to provide a means to access CDEC's online profile in order
for us to make a decision to avoid running the compressor during CDEC's peak
load periods.  We have not received access to this information which has
resulted so far in additional electric cost of $200,987.33 for the period of
July through September.  Additional cost will be incurred for the remainder
of this year, that I have not been able to review yet.  This cost is
averaging $79,000 per month if we continue to run the compressor as we have
in August and September.


Mary Hain has resigned her position with Enron.  Please remove her from all
your mail lists.

Thank you.

Lysa Akin
Gov't Affairs - Sr. Admin. Ass't.

lysa.akin@enron.com

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
03/28/2001 01:42 PM

To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev Hansen
<bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>,
"dblack@enron.com" <dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com"
<emelvin@enron.com>, "ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>,
"gweiss@enron.com" <gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com"
<gsavage@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>,
"kgustafs@enron.com" <kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>,
"sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>, "vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>,
"wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>, "William.S.Bradford@enron.com"
<William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, John
Neslage <john.neslage@enron.com>, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>, Bob
Frank <bfrank@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Assembly Republicans

The attached document was released by the Assembly Republicans in
response to the CPUC action.

 - 3-28-01.pdf


Don't bother reading this until you call.

 Setoff.   Any amount (the "Early Termination Amount") payable to one party
(the Payee) by the other party (the Payer) under Section 6(e), in
circumstances where there is a Defaulting Party or one Affected Party in the
case where a Termination Event under Section 5(b)(iv) or (v) has occurred,
will, at the option of the party ("X") other than the Defaulting Party or the
Affected Party (and without prior notice to the Defaulting Party or the
Affected Party), be reduced by its set-off against any amount(s) (the "Other
Agreement Amount") payable (whether at such time or in the future or upon the
occurrence of a contingency) by the Payee to the Payer (irrespective of the
currency, place of payment or booking office of the obligation) under any
other agreement(s) between the Payee and the Payer or instrument(s) or
undertaking(s) issued or executed by one party to, or in favor of, the other
party (and the Other Agreement Amount will be discharged promptly and in all
respects to the extent it is so set-off).  X will give notice to the other
party of any set-off effected under this Part  5(a).

 For this purpose, either the Early Termination Amount or the Other Agreement
Amount (or the relevant portion of such amounts) may be converted by X into
the currency in which the other is denominated at the rate of exchange at
which such party would be able, acting in a reasonable manner and in good
faith, to purchase the relevant amount of such currency.

 If an obligation is unascertained, X may in good faith estimate that
obligation and set-off in respect of the estimate, subject to the relevant
party accounting to the other when the obligation is ascertained.


Dear Vincent,  The Washington bureau will bring us more Wednesday from their one-on-one interview with FERC Chairman Pat Wood.  We'll hear what Chairman Wood has to say on a wide range of topics including market power, standard market design and the push for regional transmission organizations.  Wood will also talk about the implications of the Enron collapse and why he feels Texas will play an important role in showing the country that retail electricity competition can work.     Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says they'll bring us details Wednesday of an announcement from Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham on a new government partnership with the auto industry, aimed at developing cars powered by hydrogen. Abraham is expected to unveil the plan at the Detroit auto show tomorrow.   Washington will also take a closer look at the impact the crisis in Argentina is having on U.S. energy companies.  U.S. Energy Association's Barry Worthington will talk about Argentina during the 11:00 a.m. ET newscast.   On Wednesday from the Houston bureau, Industrial Information Resources Synfuels and Petroleum Refining Group Manager Chris Paschall will stop by.  He'll discuss the U.S. petroleum refining industry during the noon ET newscast tomorrow.    Also from Houston, Simmons Company & International Analyst Justin Tugman talks about the problems Halliburton is having, and how those problems shouldn't affect other companies in the oil field service sector.  Join us from the Houston bureau on Wednesday.   California Governor Gray Davis gives his State of the State address Tuesday evening.  West Coast Correspondent Kym McNicholas says he is expected to talk about California's energy conservation efforts and what's to come in 2002.  We'll bring you details from Governor Davis' speech on Wednesday from the West Coast bureau.   Kym also says she'll be speaking with Western Power Trading Forum Executive Director Gary Ackerman on Wednesday.  Ackerman will bring us his reaction to Governor Davis' State of the State address.    Closing Prices for Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2002    Crude: $21.25/bbl -$0.23   Unleaded: $0.6099/gallon -$0.0135   Heating Oil: $0.5682/gallon -$0.0037   Gas: $2.811/mmBtu +$0.009   Fwd uE(Feb): $3.76/mmBtu $0.00   Video Library: Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook's one-on-one interview with FERC Chairman Pat Wood is archived in its entirety in ENL's Video Library.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to reschedule or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  Real Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


I sent the model that matches up with the information we have already submitted to them.

-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: Re: SD model

Why aren't we using the lower capex number with the lower rates?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Hyatt, Kevin <Kevin.Hyatt@ENRON.com>
To: Howard, Kevin A. <Kevin.Howard@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Feb 05 13:31:36 2002
Subject: SD model

Attached is the Sun Devil model using the $911mm Capex and project life of 30 years.  The model is somewhat complex and may require spending some time on the phone with James Centilli, the model's designer.  We will make ourselves available at your convenience.

Regards,
Kevin Hyatt

 <<SD total financials.XLS>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001
11:05 AM ---------------------------

Tori Kuykendall
02/13/2001 11:03 AM
To: Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: December pasadena


Hello, Vince!

I was planning to stop by Damian's this evening, but I think I'll go home
instead.  I've contracted a sneezy cold, and I don't want to spread it around
anymore than I already have.

Thank you for putting this together.  I'll have to make the one in January
for sure!

Sam


EnronOnline passes one million transactions.  Woohoo!

Also in this issue:
Enron.com -- it's fabulously new and improved!
How Enron likes Bush's new energy policy
California update
What's going on in the French wholesale market?
Learn about caps -- not the ones you wear, of course.
What do Frank Gehry and Enron have in common?
Jeff leads in a dangerous time

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz May 25, 2001."


did i win my bet?


For those attending the Energy Bar Association Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting on
April 26, 2001, this is a reminder that the President's Award is being
presented at 9:00a.m., to The Honorable John D. Dingell, U.S. House of
Representatives, for his extraordinary contribution to the Development of
Energy Law.

We look forward to seeing you there!


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	enron_update@concureworkplace.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-enron+5Fupdate+40concureworkplace+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:27 PM
To:	James Derrick Jr.
Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - Dallas SWLF

The Approval status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Dallas SWLF
Report Total: $302.50
Amount Due Employee: $302.50
Amount Approved: $302.50
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Pending
Payment Status: Pending

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Attached is the Schedule and Paragraph 13

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


Excellent - please circulate for signing

From:	Zhiyong Wei/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 04:16 PM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: GTV II

Please see the attached file for the revised inception document. I would appreciate any comments. We will be working on the specification of phase 2 once this document is signed off.

Thanks

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, March 19, 2001 11:15 AM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	Stock, Stephen; Storey, Geoff; Sullivan, Colleen; Perlman, Beth; Bibi, Philippe A.
Subject:	RE: GTV II

Comments:

Zhiyong Wei to be added to signature lists.
Timeline to include production dates - ie include UAT and production roll-out dates.
Dependencies - where there are dependencies on other groups (any interaction required with any group outside of Zheiyong's), these need to be highlighted and a representative from that group needs to sign off on that portion of the timeline ( a representative can not be below Director level in the organiztion).

There are clearly many people rolling off early in this project who can be utilized for Phase II - I would suggest the specfication for Phase II is completed in the very near future as the majority of the work in this is done in the very short term by the developers and it moves to the test team.

Please re-issue today.

Louise

From:	Zhiyong Wei/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/16/2001 12:34 PM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: GTV II

Louise,

Attached please find the inception document requested. I would greatly appreciated your comments. I will be consulting Colleen and Geoff for any necessary revision. I will be requesting signatures on Wednesday afternoon, March 21.

Thanks

Zhiyong

 << File: inception_GTV II.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoppe, Tammie   On Behalf Of Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, March 13, 2001 4:24 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	Stock, Stephen; Storey, Geoff; Sullivan, Colleen; Perlman, Beth; Bibi, Philippe A.
Subject:	GTV II

I understand we have now finalized 90% requirements on the GTV II.

Please could we pull together the format inception document this week for signature on your meeting next week with Geof and Colleen.

Document to include all requirements, dependencies and timelines.

I would suggest whoever is writing this spend some time with Geof this week.

Please circulate to draft all listed above including me.

Thanks,

Louise


---------------------- Forwarded by Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/27/2000 10:31 AM ---------------------------

Katherine Padilla
09/27/2000 08:57 AM
To: Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Cecilia Ramirez/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: org chart

For your files...
---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Padilla/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/27/2000 08:59 AM ---------------------------

Tracie Pressler@ENRON
09/22/2000 09:31 AM
To: Katherine Padilla/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: org chart

see attached...


Mark,

Thanks. I can always depend on a prompt response from you.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koenig, Mark
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:58 PM
To:	Valencia, Laura
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	FW: Power Point presentation about Enron

L - Pls. email Vince a copy of the presentation I used in LA and Denver.  Thanks.  MEK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Monday, May 21, 2001 5:43 PM
To:	Koenig, Mark
Subject:	Power Point presentation about Enron

Mark,

I am going to give a presentation on risk management to Wharton Business Schools professors.
Do we have a presentation about Enron (January 2001 or the 1st quarter summary) from
which I could borrow a fee slides about Enron?

Vince


Pam,

The term papers arrived at my Internet mailbox.
I shall be sending you the information as I make progress reading the papers.

First group of students:

Helen Demianenko
Javier Lamas
Lynn Nazareth
Shauywn Smith
Carlos Wheelock
Sarah Woody

Grade: A

Please, confirm receipt of this message and please double check
that all registered students have been graded (to make sure no student falls through
the cracks).

Vince


Hi Sheryl, please add David Cox's name in the list. Additionally, please
include Chonawee Supatgiat for Research.

Once John approves the current list and we get some feed back by talking to
people's admin to book attendees time.

Ravi.

Here is the latest version of the agenda.

	Sheryl Lara
	03/27/00 04:59 PM

		 To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/Enron Communications, John
Griebling/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Offsite Meeting -- Great Divide Lodge -- Invited Guest List
Gentlemen:

Attached please find the "proposed" final invitees list for the Technical,
Research, and Operations Offsite Meeting to be held April 27-29, 2000 at the
Great Divide Lodge in Breckenridge, Colorado.   I am working with Shirley
Crenshaw to secure cost-efficient travel and meeting arrangements for the
entire group.  In order to secure a group rate, we must make sure we have a
"final headcount" in place.   Please let me know by Tuesday, March 28th at
12:00 noon if you have any additions or corrections to the attached list.
Many thanks in advance for your prompt attention!


Dear Paul,

Thank you for your inquiry as to availability for standard rooms the nights
of August 10th - 13th, 2001.  Currently we have units #22, #23, #25, #26,
#27 available those nights.  All of them with the exception of #22 have
queen beds.  #22 has two twin beds.  Cost for these units will be $90.00 per
night, plus tax.

Please feel free to contact our reservation staff at 509-682-4494 and we
will be happy to further assist you with your Stehekin travel plans.

Sincerely,

The Staff at the Stehekin Lodge
----- Original Message -----
From: <paul.y'barbo@enron.com>
To: <info@stehekin.com>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:23 PM
Subject: Stehekin Info Request

> On Fri May  4 16:23:57 2001,
> The following information was submitted:
> Host: 192.152.140.9
> Name = Paul Y'Barbo
> Address = 7707 Brykerwoods
> Town = Houston, Tx
> Country = USA
> Zip = 77055
> Home = 713 812-7158
> Work = 713 825-8046
> Fax =
> submit_by = paul.y'barbo@enron.com
> Party = 4
> ARV_DAY = 10
> ARV_MO = August
> ARV_YR = 2001
> DPT_DAY = 14
> DPT_MO = August
> DPT_YR = 2001
> Special = Please let me know about availability of 2 non-smoking Standard
Rooms. Please call my business phone.
>
> Thanks
>


Jeff and Sandi -- Enron does so much in so many places I thought you might
be interested in Wendy's resume.  She's a star.  Karen

-----Original Message-----
From: Mitchell, Wendy [mailto:Wendy.Mitchell@asm.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 2:35 PM
To: Karen Edson Edson + Modisette (E-mail)
Subject: Need Help

Karen-

I have attached a copy of my resume. I don't know if you were aware or not
but I am looking to pursue a position in Los Angeles.  I have spent the
first 8 years of my professional life working in Sacramento and I believe
now is a good time for me to explore other options.  I am very interested in
working in Government Relations in the private sector.  I would also be
interested in working in the Energy area.  Obviously I am no expert but I do
an elementary grasp of the issue.  If any of the IEP member companies were
looking for someone I would very much appreciate you forwarding my resume.
Please call me if you have any questions or want to talk further.  I am in
the office through Wednesday and available by cell phone 916-601-4907 the
remainder of this week and next.  I will be in Los Angeles the week of the
23rd on interviews.  Feel free to call me.

I appreciate anything you can do.

Wendy <<mitchellresume7.19.doc>>

 - mitchellresume7.19.doc


I would like to place a $33 bid for Prentice


Congratulations - I thought you looked busy yesterday!
 Take care,
  Billy
---------------------- Forwarded by Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron on 01/18/2000
07:38 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rick Causey                           01/17/2000 06:04 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Global Risk Management Operations

Recognizing Enron,s increasing worldwide presence in the wholesale energy
business and the need to insure outstanding internal controls for all of our
risk management activities, regardless of location, a global risk management
operations function has been created under the direction of Sally W. Beck,
Vice President.  In this role, Sally will report to Rick Causey, Executive
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.

Sally,s responsibilities with regard to Global Risk Management Operations
will mirror those of other recently created Enron global functions.  In this
role, Sally will work closely with all Enron geographic regions and wholesale
companies to insure that each entity receives individualized regional support
while also focusing on the following global responsibilities:

1. Enhance communication among risk management operations professionals.
2. Assure the proliferation of best operational practices around the globe.
3. Facilitate the allocation of human resources.
4. Provide training for risk management operations personnel.
5. Coordinate user requirements for shared operational systems.
6. Oversee the creation of a global internal control audit plan for risk
management activities.
7. Establish procedures for opening new risk management operations offices
and create key benchmarks for measuring on-going risk controls.

Each regional operations team will continue its direct reporting relationship
within its business unit, and will collaborate with Sally in the delivery of
these critical items. The Houston-based risk management operations team under
Sue Frusco,s leadership, which currently supports risk management activities
for South America and Australia, will also report directly to Sally.

Sally retains her role as Vice President of  Energy Operations for Enron
North America, reporting to the ENA Office of the Chairman.  She has been in
her current role over Energy Operations since 1997, where she manages risk
consolidation and reporting, risk management administration, physical product
delivery, confirmations and cash management for ENA,s physical commodity
trading, energy derivatives trading and financial products trading.

Sally has been with Enron since 1992, when she joined the company as a
manager in Global Credit.  Prior to joining Enron,  Sally had four years
experience as a commercial banker and spent seven years as a registered
securities principal with a regional investment banking firm.  She also owned
and managed a retail business for several years.

Please join me in supporting Sally in this additional coordination role for
global risk management operations.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/05/2000 02:28
PM ---------------------------

Paige Record <recordp@southwestern.edu> on 12/05/2000 01:49:09 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Christmas

Mom,

I would really not mind taking care of Michael at all. The only glitch is
that I have that wedding to go to on the 28th. If you could find someone
(Lena or Charlotte) to take care of him then, it would all be fine. Also,
you were getting me tickets for the GalleryFurniture.com bowl, but you can
give them to someone else if you want. As long as I'm free for New Year's
Eve, then that's totally cool. If you can't find anyone, I can ask one of
my friends that isn't going to the wedding. I have got to start studying--I
have a test on Thursday, and I am booked solid with DDD stuff until then.
Oh. I just got back from business law. That's the one with the professor
who thinks I'm his best friend. He brought up this situation so we could
talk about liability of the company. A man who works at Love's (the gas
station) was doing a security check because he could tell something was
fishy outside. He went out, and the car was running off without paying for
their gas. Company policy is not to chase them, but to get their license
plate. He was a few steps outside the door, and the car swerved to hit him
and severely injured him. His skull is fractured, and 1/3 of his brain is
bleeding. He has four kids (7,6,2, and 1). So we were talking about the
liability of Love's. The family had next do nothing, and insurance won't
cover it. We discussed it for about fifteen minutes, and several of us said
Love's should be liable. Then he picked up his things and said, "I guess
I'll tell you. That man was my son-in-law, and those kids are my
grandkids." Yikes. The room was silent. I think I'm going to get him a card
or something. He looked awful. Anyway, that's the class I just got back
from. Let me know the details of your vacation so I can be jealous!:)

Love,

Paige


Reliant has agreed to sell us gas on Florida.  My trading contact is Jim Taylor (713-207-1482).  The contact on the wire should be Pete Torres (713-207-1471), he is in Reliant's credit department.  Pete said there should be an active GISB contract with Reliant already in place.  I would like to prepay for 5 days and I have my calculation on the prepay request form.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks


-----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Snow, Dina
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:23 PM
To:	Snow, Dina; Zisman, Stuart; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Curry, Randall
Subject:	Bridgeline
When:	Friday, January 11, 2002 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	ECS 05118


: )

	From:  Clint Dean @ ENRON                           05/18/2001 08:19 AM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

I feel more at ease after our conversation last night.  I think that we
actually took a positive step to understanding each other better.  Now we
just see where it goes from here.

Clint


I haven't received the tickets yet but they are on the way.

Thanx,

Chris


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

Dear Martin,

Some time ago, you registered with us at GroceryWorks. We noticed you've
never completed a purchase and we'd really like you to give us a try. We hope
that you have visited us lately and have noticed the improvements we've made
to our site. Our sale page is updated weekly and we've added many new items
just in time for the holidays.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
???
Shop & Save!
Because we value you and want you as a customer, we're giving you $15 off
your next purchase of groceries. That's right! When you make a purchase of
$75 or more, GroceryWorks will deduct $15 off your total. Just enter MISSU6
when prompted during checkout to receive your savings. Hurry - this offer
expires January 15, 2001.

If you haven't visited lately, here is just a sample of the new aisles and
merchandise now available.

Holiday Solutions!
We have lots of solutions for the busy holiday season. You'll find
spiral-sliced honey-glazed hams, gourmet gift baskets, party platters,
ready-to-eat gourmet meals and fresh fruit baskets in our NEW Happy Holidays
aisle.

Let Us Do The Heavy Lifting!
Are you tired of lugging those big, heavy items home from the store? Just
visit our NEW Value aisle and select your favorite economy size item, add it
to your cart and let GroceryWorks deliver it right to your door. All with
just a click of a mouse.

Flowers Are Blooming!
Fresh flowers are in bloom in our NEW Floral aisle. Whether you are looking
for some flowers to remind you of spring or to put the finishing touch on
your home for the holidays, GroceryWorks has a great selection to choose
from.

FastShop Makes Shopping Quick & Easy!
Don't forget, our FastShop feature makes return shopping trips a breeze.
FastShop collects your product purchases and keeps them organized by
category. Each time you return to the website, all of your favorite products
are listed. You can quickly add products to your cart from here and it even
indicates if the item is on sale.

We hope you can't wait to get started...simply click GroceryWorks.com and
enter your user name and password to begin shopping with Your Friendly
Neighborhood Online Grocer.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

		* Offer valid from December 8, 2000 ) January 15, 2001. One coupon per
household please. Coupon may not be combined with any other coupon or
promotional offer. Not valid for the purchase of tobacco or alcohol products,
and these are not eligible toward the $75 required minimum purchase. Offer
valid for online purchases only. $15 savings does not apply to prior
purchases.
		You received this email because you are a registered customer of
GroceryWorks.com. If you prefer not to receive any information regarding
website enhancements, sales or promotions please click here and you will be
removed from our email list. GroceryWorks, 14001 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite
M-100, Dallas, TX 75240.

[IMAGE]


This is a test.  This is only  a test.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.