Thank you for shopping at Lands' End

Please refer to this number if you have any questions.

The following items will be shipped via Standard UPS to:
WILLIAM RAPP
714 CAMELOT LN
HOUSTON, TX 77024-5509
USA

Men's Regular Crew Sweat Shirt
Item: 7367-05Y0, Cobalt, Size: Medium
$28.00

------------------------------------------------------------------

$  28.00		Your merchandise total
$   5.95		Shipping costs
$   0.00		Taxes*
---------
$  33.95		Total for this order

Payment:
$  33.95  on AMEX  xxxx xxxx xxxx 004

If you have questions about your order, please call us at 1-800-963-4816
(USA), or 608-935-6170 (Intl).  You can also reply to this e-mail.

Thank you for shopping at landsend.com.

Are you getting our free e-mail newsletter?
You can receive a periodic "heads up" e-mail with the latest word
about new products, online overstocks specials, plus all the news from
Dodgeville and environs.  Visit our sign-up page and subscribe today!
http://www.landsend.com/le_news.cgi

*Taxes are estimated by our Web site, based on the total cost of all
items.  Actual tax will be calculated when your order is processed.
Your bill will reflect the correct charge.


Eric, thanks for the message.  Is Rob Walls in the loop on the proposed hire?  All the best.
 Jim Derrick


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

 - 11-26 1000 Report.xls


please note 2 hours as sick time for me today.   thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


For headcount purposes, please advise if you are planning to attend the group
out at St. Arnold's on Wednesday, October 25th.  Thank you!


PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERS FOR AIRPORT  SECURITY
There is overwhelming evidence that highly  professional public-
private partnerships work in high-threat European  countries, says
Kenneth P. Quinn, former chief counsel to the Federal  Aviation
Administration.
The European system compares favorably to the  unfunded mandate to
provide security at airports that is put on American  airlines,
says Quinn:
o There, the screening workforce is about 15 percent  public
and 85 percent private, and wages are often 60  percent
higher -- here, wages are too low.
o There, turnover is around 15 percent; here, it  often
exceeds 100 percent.
o There, national governments impose strict training,  with
36 hours' classroom time and up to 200 hours' airport
training -- here, we require 12 hours' classroom and  only
40 hours' on-the-job training.
There, proof of European Union member-state  citizenship is often
required of workers. Here, resident-alien status  suffices.
There, federal governments license the companies and  their
workers. Here, all security responsibilities fall on  carriers,
with no federal certification.
Disparaging and certainly nationalizing the private  workforce at
U.S. airports -- which by all accounts performed  properly on
Sept. 11 -- will cause the current system of contract  workers to
break down, as workers look for new jobs or transfer  to more
secure ones.
President Bush has asked Congress not to tie his  hands by
preventing him from turning to the private sector,  saying:
"Giving the government flexibility to use private  contractors
will facilitate transition to the new system, promote  better
screening services through competition, and ensure  that security
managers can move swiftly to discipline or remove  employees who
fail to live up to the rigorous new  standards."
Source: Kenneth P. Quinn, "Nationalization won't  work," USA
Today, October 26, 2001.

Gary T. Schoen,  CFA
Frontier Investment Management Co.
(TEL) 972.934.2590
(FAX)  972.934.0002www.frontierinvest.com

***************************
The opinions expressed in this message and/or any  attachments are those of the author and not necessarily those of Frontier  Investment Management Co. ("Frontier"), its subsidiaries and affiliates. There  is no guarantee that this message is either private or confidential, and it may  have been altered by unauthorized sources without your or our knowledge. Nothing  in the message is capable or intended to create any legally binding obligations  on either party and it is not intended to provide investment advice. Frontier  accepts no responsibility for loss or damage from misuse of the information,  including damage from virus. The material is based upon information we consider  reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete and should not  be relied upon as such.


HERE IS THE AGENDA FOR CHICAGO -- Any questions, please call me -- number
below

Thanks!

Tracy J. McLaughlin
Enron Broadband Services
Government Affairs Coordinator
(503) 886-0396


Well, welcome to EWS.  I like Mark Frevert, and I've heard good things about
Greg Whalley.  Also, I like working for Mark Haedicke.

Kay

John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/19/2001 07:31 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Organizational Announcement - Introducing Enron Engineering and
Operational Services

Yep, uh-huh. EWA'll have a real first class operation. Uh-huh.

JWVS

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	03/19/2001 07:12 AM

		 To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Organizational Announcement - Introducing Enron Engineering and
Operational Services

Hi John,

Sounds like we are now reunited in the same legal group, EWS.  True?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/19/2001 07:09
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mark Frevert & Dave Delainey                           03/16/2001
08:55 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Organizational Announcement - Introducing Enron Engineering and
Operational Services

In order to better align our engineering and operations capabilities with the
commercial businesses they support, we are pleased to announce the following
organizational change will be effective immediately.  A new business unit,
Enron Engineering and Operational Services (EEOS), is being formed which will
include our existing operations in Enron Engineering and Construction Company
(EE&CC), Operational Energy Corporation (OEC), and National Energy Production
Corporation (NEPCO).

Brian Stanley, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and Keith Dodson, as
Chief Operating Officer will provide the leadership for this new
organization, reporting to the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale
Services.  NEPCO will continue to operate as a stand-alone business under
John Gillis, President.

With the majority of EE&CC and OEC,s activities focused on assets and
projects which are in Wholesale Services, this will better align the efforts
of EEOS with the commercial businesses it supports.  While EEOS will be a
stand-alone unit within Enron Wholesale Services it will work very closely
with and have direct accountability to the business units it supports.

This realignment also centralizes our engineering and operations capabilities
in a single business segment and should ensure that innovation and best
practices are shared and implemented across our many operations and will also
allow for better identification of priorities and more effective allocation
of resources to these projects.  Consistent with this approach, Development
Engineering will have dual reporting to both EEOS and the business units
which they support.

With an extensive and varied portfolio of assets around the world and a wide
variety of new development opportunities available to Enron, it is critical
that we continue to maintain the best in class capability to design,
construct, commission, and effectively manage and operate Enron,s assets on a
global basis.

This new global business unit should insure that we will continue to enhance
these demonstrated capabilities and provide us with a sustainable advantage
as we advance our business strategy around the world.

Please join us in congratulating Brian and Keith on their new assignments.

Mark Frevert & Dave Delainey


thanks.  the letter is already out, but we will be accurate in follow up
calls and in press interviews.

	Tim Belden@ECT
	10/31/2000 08:33 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Hoecker letter

I just noticed one minor error.  I think that you are trying to highlight
that Terry Winter, the Chief Executive Officer of the ISO voted against the
proposal.  In the text, you say the Chairman of the ISO.  There is no
Chairman of the ISO.  There is a Chairman of the Board of the ISO -- Jan
Smutney-Jones -- who has consistently voted against the price caps since
June.  Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.


rain please print color copies for the group


Your message

  To:      whitfield@blackstone.com
  Subject: Revised Asset File List
  Sent:    Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:29:40 -0500

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Whitfield, Benjamin on Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:27:07 -0500
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:TBG_DOMAIN:TBG-NYMSX2

 - C.DTF


It sounds like it may be a little while before the IT group gets the final
approval to move the web site to the outside.  In the mean time, is it worth
while to send Sullivan&Cromwell print outs of the pages?  Right now there is
not really much info on the site.  We can identify third party links, the
type of information we will be providing as well as sources for our data.
Will this be of use?

Mike

To: Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: West Power Customer Web SIte

I have been able to access this but our outside legal counsel (Sullivan &
Cromwell in NY) can't.  Any way for them to get access so they can advise us
on this?  They are also the guys who will help with a training session on
various legal issues and company policies in trading.

Michael Etringer

01/14/2000 05:00 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: West Power Customer Web SIte

Mark,

As discussed, here is the URL for the proposed web site:
http://ecthou-lndev1.nt.ect.enron.com/westpowernet.nsf/
It is still on an internal server which I hope you will have access to.  Let
me know if it doesn't work.

The User ID is: "user1"  and the Password is:  "test"  .

I also ran through several of the web sites from which we gather our
information and did not run across the occurance of any copyright statements.

In terms of timing, we hope to release the site by the end of January to a
limited customer listing.

Regards,
Mike Etringer
503-464-3836


Rick,

I could not open the message.

Vince

Richard B Jones@EES
01/31/2001 11:40 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Insurance Simulation Model Development


Cheryl.
Where are we on this agreement for consulting services? The services will be
charged to the Rate & Currency group.
Thanks. Sheila

---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 06:29
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           02/13/2001 11:09 AM

To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Advisory Agreement per Gary Hickerson

Cheryl and Sara.
I need someone to take a read through of this document which engages Psytech
for services.
Thanks Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 11:07
AM ---------------------------

"Mark Sagel" <msagel@home.com> on 02/13/2001 10:16:43 AM
To: <sheila.glover@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Advisory Agreement per Gary Hickerson

Sheila:
?
Gary Hickerson asked me to forward the attached advisory  agreement to you
for your approval/signature.? We have entered into a  three-month trial
agreement for consulting services.? Please contact me at  (410)308-0245 if
you have any questions.? My fax number is  (410)308-0441.? I will fax a
signed copy back to you once I receive your  approval.? Thanks,
?
Mark Sagel
Psytech Analytics
msagel@home.com
?
 - Agree-Enron Global Markets.doc


http://www.city.net/countries/canada/british_columbia/vancouver/?page=specialt
y_guides


Because of a scheduling conflict earlier in the month, we had to cancel our
original plans for dinner.  The plans have been revised as follows:

  DATE:  August 18, 2000
  PLACE:  The Wine Room
     River Oaks Grill
     2630 Westheimer
     713/520-1738
  TIME:   6:30 PM

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Kay
(3X0643) or Beverly (5X7857).

I will look forward to seeing you there.


I spoke with Marvin today, he has comments on the LOI.  David Hunt will
finally be available on Wednesday to work with Kay to address legal issues.
Bob Priest is recommending Enron to his board tonight.    Due to their peaker
deal with Aquilla, they have been unable to make progress on our LOI, so it
will not be presented at his board meeting Tuesday night.  He has them on
notice that special meeting may be called to execute the LOI as early as a
week from today.  He would like to be in agreement on the LOI issues by the
end of this week.

He has the following comments on the LOI:

? page 4 paragraph 8, "negotiate" rather than "negotiates"
? we need clarification on the mechanism by which Enron will recover
infrastructure costs.  He wants to make sure that Enron cost recovery is out
of our 40% and backed up by a guaranteed monthly minimum calculated as the
amoritized capital costs over the contract period.
? he wants more detail on the $50k breakup fee.  What are the circumstances
that would precipitate a payout?
? David Hunt and Kay Mann need to get together (he indicated that David has
been unavailable) to address the legal issues including limitation of
liability and arbitration such that they agree with Mississippi law.
? he needs some specifics on the ancilliary services (load following,
regualtion, and reserves).

On the last issue, he indicated that this is the "deal maker/breaker."  He
offered that our competition indicated that their regulated side would be
providing those services.  He needs to know from Enron who we would contract
with to do it--"we can horse trade on the price later."  I indicated that we
have not given specifics to the market in searching for ancilliary services,
and were waiting on the LOI before we asked for proposals.  He wants
specifics--other than pricing--before he signs the LOI.

After talking with Ozzie and Lloyd, here is the game plan:

? get the Entergy tariff and price the ancilliary services with Entergy as
the provider
? find out who the high-load-factor IPPs are in the Mississippi area
? put calls in to those IPPs as well as CLECO, LEPA, SMEPA, Cajun, Alabama
Electric Power Co-op, and Entergy and guage interest and potential pricing
for providing ancilliary services
? we will need approximately 4 MW of regulation service, load following and
reserves.  We would send the signal and communicate with the ancilliary
service provider.
? Once we have gathered some preliminary information, call Marvin on
Wednesday and let him know that we expect to go with Entergy during the first
60 days beginning May 1 and select/negotiate/contract with one of the above
for the balance of the contract.  In no case would the pricing be higher than
the entergy tariff rates.

I would like to have Christi and Lloyd available for the call to Marvin.

How does all this sound??


The CPUC is very aware that the utilities have gone to the legislature when
the UDCs face elimination of some of the advantages that they have in the
retail market.  We now have a fully-constituted commission (5 members) with
two new democratic appointees with close ties to the governor.  This may
empower the CPUC to take control of issues within their purvue, which
ratemaking and the PX credit, clearly are.  Some members of the legislature
are loathe to get into the CPUC's backyard and "micro-manage".  That being
said, we still face significant risk within the legislature.  We have Steve
Peace, who thinks a wholesale pass-through is adequate for competition, and
Rod Wright, the chair of the Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee, who
sponsored a similar bill last year and who doesn't believe in retail
competition either.  We have our work cut out for us.

Last year we fought essentially the same battle and defeated the utilities at
attempts to include similar provisions into law for electricity.  We were
able to do so because we had a broad coalition of supporters, including the
environmental community.  Essentially, everyone opposed the utilities'
proposals.

This year we have a different scenario.  SCE is attempting to peel off
environmental groups by rolling in extension of the public purpose funding.
They are also talking to the large consumers, who may perceive that they are
able to get a better deal from the utilities by avoiding the mark-up.

However, it doesn't appear as though the utilities are united in supporting
SCE's language.  We are actively attempting to revive the coalition that was
so effective last year.  We are talking to the environmental groups to try
and keep them in the fold.  This can be done by keeping the two issues of
public purpose funding and competition as separate as possible.

We have been encouraged to settle the PX credit case by the judge.  We are
engaged in the beginning stages of settlement on the PX credit issue with
SDG&E.  We are a long way from settling, however, if we are successful, the
settlement would likely be precedential for both SCE and PG&E.  There is
significant room between the utility proposals for the "retail" portion of
the PX credit and what we are supporting.  We also appear to have the support
of the ratepayer advocates.  We are attempting to get the customer groups to
agree on an outcome, leaving the utilities isolated.  Adoption of our
proposal for the full retail adder is a long-shot.

From a timing perspective, it is possible that we will resolve this issue at
the PUC, before any legislation would become effective.  However, that would
not prevent the legislation from estopping the CPUC decision.

We could use the help of the business units in providing documented
information about the UDCs activities, if its available.  Customer accounts
are very credible, however most customers are unwilling to do that.  We may
also need some assistance from the business units in presenting testimony
when these issues go to hearing before the appropriate committees.

We are working on this issue and will report on any developments.  Thanks.

Jim Badum
03/01/2000 06:22 AM
To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Kelly Cook/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Thomas S
Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Janel Guerrero/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa
Mackey/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin
Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Phyllis Anzalone/SFO/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES,
Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Re2: SCE Legislative Language

So, what do we do to stop this...?

Roger Yang
02/29/2000 04:52 PM
To: Kelly Cook/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Jim
Badum/HOU/EES@EES, Janel Guerrero/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Mackey/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES,
Phyllis Anzalone/SFO/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Re2: SCE Legislative Language

This is a blatant example of marketing on behalf of SCE.  Of course SCE does
this stuff under the guise of Customer Education.  Do we have anything in
writing provided by SCE that Enron Govt Affairs can provide to the CPUC as
examples of marketing activities, whereby the costs of these types of
activities should be unbundled from the distribution rate.

Of course there is no mark--up what so ever, because the cost of providing
retail commodity is recovered in distribution rates.  Enron Govt Affairs is
currently participating in a proceeding as part of a coalition to determine
what this commodity cost adder should be.

Additionally, the reason there is no premium mark-up for risk management is
because these costs are all pass throughs so there is no price certainty for
the customer.  In fact, there will be price volatility from month-to-month,
if not hour-to-hour.  We do not want to push this last point to much, to the
extent that the customers rally at the CPUC to eliminate the volatility along
with the price signals in favor of interclass and intertemporal subsidies.

Roger

Kelly Cook
02/29/2000 02:02 PM
To: Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Jim Badum/HOU/EES@EES, Janel
Guerrero/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Mackey/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Phyllis
Anzalone/SFO/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re2: SCE Legislative Language

As you would expect, SCE is out telling customers that the proposed
legislative language regarding default electric service is a done deal. The
relevant text in Bruno's message below is as follows:

"SCE believes that the UDC should be the default provider and offer commodity
at a pass through PX price with no adders."

Apparently, SCE is going one step further than a straight pass through of PX
day ahead prices with no adders when in front of industry trade groups. A
potential EES customer has told me that since 1/1/00, John Fiedler, Sr. VP of
Regulatory Policy and Affairs for SCE, has spoken at both CMA and CLECA
meetings and presented with great assurance that in the post transition
period, SCE will purchase both long term and short term energy and pass
through a blended wholesale energy cost with no mark-up to large, end-use
customers.

My interpretation is that such an offering by SCE would put them in direct
competition with ESPs.

Kelly

Bruno Gaillard
02/16/2000 11:56 AM
To: Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Jim Badum/HOU/EES@EES, Janel
Guerrero/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Mackey/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Phyllis
Anzalone/SFO/EES@EES, Kelly Cook/SFO/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: SCE Legeslative Language

SCE has submitted proposed legislative language at the California Legislation
that will define the role of the utility. This language has not yet found a
bill. However, in order to be prepared, Sandi McCubbin has asked me to
forward the proposed  language for analysis.

Bellow is a preliminary analysis of the bill and of our position. Please
expand, edit and complete for legislative action. Please foward to
appropreate people for comments.

Summary:

SCE is defining the basic electric service to include, Distribution,
Metering, Billing, and Customer Service

SCE believes that the UDC should be the default provider and offer commodity
at a pass through PX price with no adders.

Every customer will be charged a non-bypassable charge for basic electric
service (customer charge) and a non-bypassable public goods charge (Energy
efficiency, low income, R&D, and renewable charge). Renewable charge includes
funding for production credits for renewable not under contract with utility,
mandatory state purchase of renewable energy, minimum utility content of
renewable energy, PX green product, Customer credit for Renewables not under
contract with the utility.

DA customers can choose billing and metering services from their ESP and will
receive an avoided cost credit from the UDC for these services.

Analysis:

SCE is trying to preempt through the legislation the role of the utility to
be a Wires and Revenue Cycle Services (RCS) company. Furthermore they see
themselves as being a default provider and offer electric commodity at the
wholesale price, undermining any kind of competition from ESPs.

Their definition of what is included in the renewable credit again undermines
any competition for ESPs in offering these products.

Furthermore, although SCE allows ESPs to offer metering and billing services,
the credit ESPs can receive is based on an avoided cost. The CPUC is
currently presiding over a proceeding, in which it is trying to unbundle RCS.
At a minimum the credits for billing and metering services should be based on
Long Run Marginal Costs.

Position: Actively Oppose

The UDC should be a wires only company. For a UDC, Basic Electric Service
should only include the distribution of the electric power and should be
renamed as Basic Electric Distribution Service. Revenue Cycle Services
(metering, billing,..) should be unbundled from the distribution function.
Costs allocated to these functions should be based, at a minimum, on a Long
Run Marginal Costs or Embedded Costs. The Avoided Costs allocation does not
represent all the costs associated with these services.

The default provider function should be competitively bid out to ESPs and
non-regulated affiliates. The UDCs should be out of the energy service
business including all electric retail functions. The commodity charge for
default customers should include the PX price, all procurement related costs,
and retail marketing related costs.

Currently, the green market is the only viable market in CA for small
consumers.  This proposal would eliminate the competitive market and ensure
market-share dominance for UDC and PX.

SCE's proposal would limit, or seriously restrict, the development of the
market to only UDC-provided green products of PX-provided green products.
This structure creates a subsidy for both the UDCs and the PX for green
products, which would disadvantage competitive offerings for the amount under
contract, providing the UDC with a guaranteed base-load of green-product
demand.  The market available to competitors for green would be only the
demand in excess of the base, for which customers (not ESPs) would receive a
credit from the UDC for the incremental green demand.  Again, because the UDC
would be in the position of doling out credits for green, they would still
control that market.

Attached is a copy of SCE's draft language.


Thanks for the information.  It is good to know we have a potential ally.

I'm not sure when the MA AG weighed in on the Verizon petition.  If it was a
last minute effort at the FCC it is likely to be less effective that if they
were active in the proceeding when the state was making its determination.
The point here is that the timing of the AG's participation is bound to be as
important as the issues they raise.

Obviously, before we would engage in soliciting AG intervention, we would
have to have a very clear strategy about how much pressure we want to exert
in 271 applications, directly or indirectly, in exchange for cooperation on
other fronts (access to high capacity loops, for example).  This is
especially true in light of our discussion around our primary wholesale
trading partners on today's weekly call.

From: Lara Leibman on 04/30/2001 02:03 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Bolton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Margo
Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: NAAG

Everyone,

I finally touched base with Emily Meyers, my contact at the National
Association of Attorneys General ("NAAG") regarding their involvement on the
telecom side, specifically with regard to Section 271 authorizations.

According to Emily, there is no group effort that exists (i.e., a telecom
committee or an individual AG taking the lead on telecom issues).  Individual
AGs get involved, but that is all.  For example, MA AG Tom Reilley recently
opposed Verizon's application for 271 authority, but the FCC still granted
Verizon's petition.

Emily recommends that we use the AGs as much as possible.  For example, if we
believe that local competition is non-existent and we have evidence to that
effect, we should certainly convey that information to the individual AG and
have him/her weigh in on our behalf.  Emily recognizes that Enron is
pro-competitive and that typically the AGs would be in agreement with our
positions - so it's something for us to keep in mind as we move forward.
There's no guarantee that the FCC will listen to the AGs, but it may be worth
a try.

If anyone has any thoughts or comments, please let me know.  Thanks.

Lara


Congratulations Kathleen and Peter.  This ought to make this week's ARM
meeting, well, sort of interesting.

Viva New Power!

Best,
Jeff

	"PennFuture" <pennfuture@pennfuture.org>
	11/03/2000 03:48 PM
	Please respond to "PennFuture"

		 To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:@mailman.enron.com;>
		 cc:
		 Subject: PennFuture's E-cubed

PennFuture's E-cubed is a commentary biweekly email publication concerning
the current themes and trends in the energy market.

November 3, 2000
Vol. 2, No. 22

Pennsylvania's First Successful CDS Auction

An important new regulatory skirmish has broken out before the Pennsylvania
Public Utility Commission (PUC) over which company has won the right to
provide default generation service to 300,000 customers of PECO Energy, an
Exelon Company. This skirmish is actually good news for consumers and is the
fruit of the 1998 PECO Energy restructuring settlement agreement, a landmark
document that ended a ferocious regulatory war when all combatants signed it.

The &peace treaty8 includes a requirement that PECO Energy bid out default
service for 20% of its customers, and PECO has done so. Green Mountain Energy
Company is now challenging PECO Energy,s decision that New Power won the
auction to provide the settlement,s mandated default service.

Both Green Mountain and New Power are offering those 300,000 consumers small
rate reductions compared to customers receiving default service from PECO,
and more electricity generated from renewable energy resources. Specifically,
New Power and Green Mountain are offering generation service to Rate R
residential customers for approximately 5.54 cents per kilowatt-hour. That
offer is 3.11 cents per kilowatt-hour less than PECO Energy,s unbundled
generation and transmission rate of 8.65 cents per kilowatt-hour and 0.11
cents per kilowatt-hour less than the shopping credit of 5.65.

The consumer savings that these offers represent is masked or reduced by the
stranded cost payments that consumers must pay PECO Energy. Indeed, were it
not for stranded cost payments, the New Power and Green Mountain offers would
reduce total bills by about 3.11 cents per kilowatt-hour, or 20%.

The dispute between New Power and Green Mountain is noteworthy because it
proves that companies will compete vigorously to provide default service if
shopping credits and lengths of contracts are set at reasonable levels. It
also shows that renewable energy portfolio standards can be met economically.
Finally, the result of this case will switch more customers to competitive
suppliers in one day than the total number who switched in California over a
period of nearly three years.

When the PUC anoints New Power or Green Mountain as the winner, if all
299,300 consumers opt to stay with the CDS provider, the total number of
customers in Pennsylvania that will be served by a competitive supplier will
jump to more than 850,000. Of this total, 504,000 will be residential
customers of PECO, a number equal to 37% of the PECO residential class.

CDS Background: In Pennsylvania, there must always be a &default8 supplier or
&provider of last resort8 to assure that service is always available to all
customers. The incumbent utility is the default supplier, unless the PUC
decides otherwise. The default supplier must provide generation service to
customers who do not have a competitive supplier either because they chose
not to shop or did not find a willing supplier at an acceptable price. The
PECO Restructuring Case Settlement initially defined CDS service in paragraph
38:

&On January 1, 2001, 20% of all of PECO,s residential customers -- determined
by random selection, including low-income and inability-to-pay customers, and
without regard to whether such customers are obtaining generation service
from an EGS -- shall be assigned to a provider of last resort-default
supplier other than PECO that will be selected on the basis of a
Commission-approved energy and capacity market price bidding process. This
service shall be referred to as Competitive Default Service (&CDS8).8

The same approach was used in the other Settlements in the GPU, PPL and APS
restructuring cases. CDS reflects an effort to assure that there is at least
one other large competitor in each market. CDS also has a renewable portfolio
standard (RPS), even though there is no RPS for regulated utilities in
Pennsylvania. The winning bidder must supply:

&(2.0% of its offered energy supply for CDS service from renewable resources
of solar, wind, sustainable biomass (including landfill gas but excluding
incineration of Municipal Solid Waste), geothermal or ocean power. The
renewable energy increment shall increase by annual increments of 0.5%
thereafter.8

This increasing renewable requirement continues indefinitely, meaning that in
year four of the CDS there will be a 3.5% renewable requirement, 4% in year
five and so on. This is significant, as each extra percent of renewable
energy used to serve the 299,300 customer block prevents approximately 950
tons of NOx, 3200 tons of SO2, and 390,000 tons of CO2 from being emitted by
fossil fuel burning power plants.

PECO,s CDS RFP: Importantly, the PECO/Unicom merger case modified the CDS
bidding process as established by the 1998 settlement. Of particular note,
the revisions eliminated the &customer care8 functions from CDS, made the
contract three years long to help spread out return of start-up costs, and
instituted several rounds of selection in the event that prior efforts
yielded no successful CDS contract.

PECO issued its initial RFP for CDS on April 6, 2000, and Shell Energy
Services submitted the only bid. However, the PUC rejected the bid as
non-conforming and denied Shell,s Petition for Reconsideration of its
decision. Pursuant to the modifications in the merger settlement, PECO
entered into bilateral negotiations based on an August 24, 2000 RFP.

Three suppliers submitted conforming bids, and PECO selected New Power as the
winner on October 18, 2000. New Power is the new competitive supplier
actively marketing residential and small commercial customers in the PECO
service territory and is backed by Enron, AOL, and IBM.

PECO and New Power negotiated a complete contract that is before the PUC for
approval on November 9, 2000. Under the proposal, PECO and New Power expanded
the size of the CDS requirement to include 22% (299,300) of non-shopping
residential customers instead of 20% of all residential customers, whether
shopping or not. This change was designed to implement paragraph 39 of the
Restructuring Settlement, requiring adjustments to the numbers assigned to
CDS in order to have 35% of all PECO residential and commercial customers
obtaining competitive generation as of January 1, 2001. There also will be a
second round of assignment of non-shopping customers as of October 15, 2002
if New Power is providing CDS to fewer than 20% of all PECO residential
customers

New Power electricity will be 2% renewable in 2001, 2.5% renewable in 2002,
and 3% renewable in 2003 as required, but does not include a commitment to
exceed the requirements or provide cleaner power for the non-renewable
portion of the product.

The price for New Power,s CDS for Rate R customers would be 2.02% below the
shopping credit, while residential heating customers on Rate RH would pay
1.02% less than their shopping credit. For a Rate R customer, this would mean
that overall rates would fall .8% (as energy and transmission falls from 5.65
to 5.54); for Rate RH rates would fall .44%. Customers assigned to CDS may
still choose any competitive supplier, or opt out and retain default service
from PECO without penalty or charge. New Power will be able to offer its full
slate of energy and non-energy related products to these customers.

Green Mountain asserts that approval of the PECO/New Power contract is &not
in the public interest,8 arguing that PECO ignored Green Mountain,s offer
that included CDS pricing 2% below the shopping credit for all residential
customers, including those on residential heating or off-peak service. Like
the New Power proposal, the Green Mountain proposal would lower Rate R and RH
rates .8% and .44%, respectively. Green Mountain asserts that the New Power
rate cut for Rate R is only 1.83%, and not 2% and argues that its product is
better for the environment because the non-renewable portion of the product
would come from natural gas and hydro instead of system power generated
primarily from coal and nuclear fuels. If not declared the winning bidder,
Green Mountain proposes in the alternative that both they and New Power
receive CDS contracts.

In response, PECO states that all three bidders had the opportunity to submit
revised bids and that the Green Mountain revised bid was not submitted until
October 12, 2000, 13 days after the deadline and nine days after the
selection of New Power as the winning bidder.

The PUC will sort out the facts and arguments on November 9. Some think that
the PUC may very well split the 300,000 customer block between Green Mountain
and New Power.

Whatever the result, customers in the Philadelphia area should receive yet
another small price reduction, more renewable energy, and the opportunity for
a more competitive electricity market.

E-cubed is available for reprint in newspapers and other publications.
Authors are available for print or broadcast.

Support E-cubed by becoming a member of PennFuture * visit our secure online
membership page at www.pennfuture.org by clicking on &Support Our Work.8

PennFuture, with offices in Harrisburg, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, is a
statewide public interest membership organization, which advances policies to
protect and improve the state,s environment and economy. PennFuture,s
activities include litigating cases before regulatory bodies and in local,
state and federal courts, advocating and advancing legislative action on a
state and federal level, public education and assisting citizens in public
advocacy.

We hope you found this informative and interesting. However, if you would
prefer not to receive future issues, please reply to this email and type
&unsubscribe8 in the subject line.


Jinbaek,

You can coordinate the details with me.
Let me know what the time frame is for you
and we shall send you an appropriate offer.

Vince

Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/02/2001 04:43:06 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Summer internship

Dr. Kaminski,

Thank you very much.
Of course, I'll be happy to have an opportunity
to work at such a wonderful company.
I was contacting with Surech Raghavan at Deal Bench team,
and was going to express my appreciation to you again
after settling down process with them.

For the period of working,
I still need to coordinate with my advisor and
may need to adjust according to that.
but anyway, I'll try to coordinate smoothly.

Please let me know whether I should keep contacting
with Deal Bench team,
for working period and
for misc. living support such as finding a place, rent a car, etc.

I appreciate you so much again,
for arranging such meetings and giving me an opportunity.
All this opportunity will not be available to me,
without your kind help.

Warm Regards,
Jinbaek

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jinbaek Kim
Ph.D Candidate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
U.C.Berkeley
http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek

Go Bears!

      :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
     :      a   a      :                 __....._
     :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
      :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
       `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
        : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
        `.   '"'                                   ;
         `.               '                        ;
          `.     `        :           `            ;
           .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
         .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
     __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
   .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
   `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
         `.......-'                 `........'

On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Sorry for a delay in getting back to you.
> We would like very much to offer you a summer internship.
>
> Please, let me know if you are interested.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
>


I will be leaving the office today at 1:00 to take my son with asthma to the
doctor.  I will be in the office tomorrow.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


Rick Shapiro will have overall responsibility with support from Paul where
needed in London .
Thanks
Michael

	Barry Pearce @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	11/04/2001 17:57

To: Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

Michael,

We have been supported by a guy called Jan Haizmann  - who was in Mark's
group.

How will that relationship now work - do you know?

Hope you are well.

B.
----- Forwarded by Barry Pearce/Enron Communications on 04/11/01 12:00 PM
-----

	Enron Europe Office of the Chairman@ECT
	Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement@ECT
	04/11/01 05:37 AM
	Please respond to Enron Europe Office of the Chairman

		 To: ECT Asia Pacific, ECT Dubai, ECT Europe, Enron VPs and MDs 1, Enron VPs
and MDs 2, Enron Executive Committee
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

After nearly five years in London, Mark Schroeder will be returning to the US
on April 11th to join the North American Coal Business with responsibility
for origination in the utility sector.  Under Mark,s leadership, his team has
made significant contributions towards Enron Europe,s &first mover8 advantage
and its status as the leading new entrant in the liberalizing pan-European
energy markets.  We wish him well in his new commercial role.

With Mark,s departure, the day-to-day management of the Government &
Regulatory Affairs Department in Europe will rest with Peter Styles, Paul
Dawson, Paul Hennemeyer, and Doug Wood. Nick O,Day will continue in his
current leadership capacity in Japan.  Each of these five individuals and
their groups will now jointly report to the business heads and to Rick
Shapiro, in the Government & Regulatory Affairs team in Houston. Rick Shapiro
will continue to manage Government Affairs for the Americas.  While the team
members responsibilities will vary from time-to-time in response to shifting
commercial priorities, as well as the need to support other Enron Wholesale
Services' business units from time-to-time, the general areas of
responsibility will be as follows:

Peter Styles, based in Brussels, will continue to have responsibility for our
EU and Netherlands advocacy.  Paul Hennemeyer will lead efforts in the German
speaking countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) as well as France and
Belgium. Peter and Paul will report to Eric Shaw.  While seconded to the
commercial team in France, Philip Davies will address Nordic market issues on
an ad hoc basis and also report to Paul on these issues.

Paul Dawson will lead our UK, Spain and Italian power regulatory efforts as
well as the gas regulatory work in the UK.  Doug Wood will support the
Continental Gas team and the Central and Southeastern Europe Origination
efforts, while also addressing the UK Climate Change Levy.  Doug's role in
gas will continue to be supplement, and not to supplant, the efforts of each
of the team members' geographic responsibilities noted on the organisation
chart. Paul and Doug will report to Richard Lewis locally.

Nick O,Day will also continue to report to Joe Hirl in Japan.

Other regulatory support provided by Mark Schroeder will be addressed in
another organizational announcement that will be sent
out from Government & Regulatory Affairs in Houston.  Attached is the revised
organization chart that now reflects the Government & Regulatory Affairs
organization in Enron Europe.

John Sherriff & Michael Brown

Please click on the link below to view the Regulatory Affairs organisational
charts for Europe and Japan.

Link to organisational charts


****************************************************************

Schwab e.Bulletin -- January 2001

****************************************************************

In this issue:
1. Daily Market Recap
2. 2000 Market Summary
3. Does Higher Risk Always Mean Higher Reward?
4. Pre-IPO Private Placements
5. Fund's Got a New Manager -- Should You Stay?
6. The Stock Market: Two Markets in One
7. Cookies Demystified
8. 529 College Savings Plan
9. The Schwab 1000 Fund(R). -- Smart About Growth. Careful
About Taxes(TM).
10. Apply for an IRA Online
11. A Smart Time to Refinance?
12. Schwab Learning Center Announces New Courses on Taxes
and Stock Investing
13. Update: The Big Switch to Decimal Quotes
14. Wireless Technologies Video Webcast
15. Argus Roundtable
16. Advice for Fifty Plus: Charles Schwab's New Book
17. The Proactive Investor's Calendar

****************************************************************

Transfer funds between your Schwab accounts and your accounts at
other financial institutions.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t1/eb_jan/sig/transfer/

****************************************************************

****************************************************************

Need to make a withdrawal? Request a check online.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t2/eb_jan/sig/Check/

****************************************************************

****************************************************************

Make sure you receive your 1099 form on time, update your
address online.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t3/eb_jan/sig/form/

****************************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------

1. Daily Market Recap

----------------------------------------------------------------

Read about what happened in the market* today in the Daily
Market Recap.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t4/eb_jan/sig/recap/

*The content on this page is updated daily.
Therefore, no matter when you are reading your e.Bulletin, the
Daily Market Recap should be current.

----------------------------------------------------------------

2. 2000 Market Summary

----------------------------------------------------------------

Read about what happened in the market last year in the 2000
Market Summary.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t5/eb_jan/sig/summary/

----------------------------------------------------------------

3. Does Higher Risk Always Mean Higher Reward?

----------------------------------------------------------------

Our commentator challenges a popular financial theory that
postulates the "more risk, more return" concept. His conclusion:
the theory is full of shortcomings.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t6/eb_jan/sig/higher/

----------------------------------------------------------------

4. Pre-IPO Private Placements

----------------------------------------------------------------

Long before an initial public offering (IPO), most new companies
undergo an arduous search for capital. Here's a look at the
world of "angel" investors, private placements and start-up
funding. Is there an opportunity here for you?

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t7/eb_jan/sig/IPO/

----------------------------------------------------------------

5. Fund's Got a New Manager -- Should You Stay?

----------------------------------------------------------------

A new person is running one of your mutual funds. Is it time to
leave? This article provides guidelines to help you decide
whether to remain or move your money elsewhere.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t8/eb_jan/sig/manager/

----------------------------------------------------------------

6. The Stock Market: Two Markets in One

----------------------------------------------------------------

* The stock market is actually two different types of markets.
* The exchanges: Where listed stocks are traded.
* Computerized trading on Nasdaq and the OTC markets.

Read the Article
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t9/eb_jan/sig/market/

----------------------------------------------------------------

7. Cookies Demystified

----------------------------------------------------------------

In the language of the Internet, cookies store small pieces of
information that are sent to your browser by a web site. The web
site uses the information in the cookie to recognize you and
give you personalized service.

Cookies save you time when you are shopping online. If it weren't
for cookies, online shopping carts wouldn't exist. It's because
of cookies that you can place an item in an electronic shopping
cart at your favorite web site, continue shopping, and find your
way back to your shopping cart -- with the items you have selected --
without a hitch. Cookies also enable personalized messaging
("Hello, Mary!") and targeted marketing ("Would you care to purchase
music by the same band you selected last time?").

Cookies can enhance your online experiences. We thought you might
be interested in how Schwab uses cookies. When you go to
schwab.com, we recognize you as a Schwab.com client and send
you a different start page than we send to non-customers.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t10/eb_jan/sig/cookies/

To learn more about how we use cookies, gifs and other web tools
on Schwab.com.

----------------------------------------------------------------

8. 529 College Savings Plan

----------------------------------------------------------------

529 College Savings plans offer an innovative way to save for
your child or grandchild's college education.  Unlike education
IRAs and custodial accounts, which place many financial and
other restrictions on both the contributor and the recipient,
529 Plans offer one of the most flexible ways to save for a
college education.  Also, contributions of up to $50,000
($100,000 per couple) to a student in a single year are free
from federal gift tax if no additional gifts are made to the
same person in the next four years.

Other benefits include:
* tax-advantaged growth
* high contribution limits per beneficiary
* qualified withdrawals taxed at student's rate

To learn more visit Schwab's online guide.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t11/eb_jan/sig/college/

----------------------------------------------------------------

9. The Schwab 1000 Fund(R). -- Smart About Growth. Careful About
Taxes(TM).

----------------------------------------------------------------

Are you concerned about taxes? Perhaps you should consider a
tax-efficient mutual fund, such as the Schwab 1000 Fund(R) Since
the fund's inception in April 1991, the Schwab 1000 Fund(R) has
not paid a capital gain distribution. Of course, past
performance is no guarantee of future results. For a prospectus
containing more information on management fees, risks and
expenses,

Go to http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t12/eb_jan/sig/taxes/

Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.

----------------------------------------------------------------

10. Apply for an IRA Online

----------------------------------------------------------------

An Individual Retirement Account (IRA) is an important part of
retirement planning. It offers tax advantaged investment growth
which means your money can grow without being subject to current
taxation. Even if you have a company plan, you may still have an
IRA to give you an additional opportunity to invest in stocks,
mutual funds or bonds on a tax advantaged basis. You'll find all
the resources you need to apply for your IRA at schwab.com

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t13/eb_jan/sig/IRA/

Remember, the deadline  is April 16, 2001 to fund your IRA for
tax year 2000. Don't wait until the last minute! Funding your
IRA with Schwab has never been easier.  Find the closest
location to send your Year 2000 contribution.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t14/eb_jan/sig/contribution/

----------------------------------------------------------------

11. A Smart Time to Refinance?

----------------------------------------------------------------

You actively manage your investments to maximize returns. Do you
pay as much attention to your mortgage? You should. Housing is
the single biggest investment most of us ever make. To find out
if refinancing can save you money, check out the Mortgage
Check-Up at the Schwab Mortgage Center, provided by E-LOAN. It
will look at today's rates and can help you decide if now is the
time to refinance. You can also set up a free account to monitor
interest rates on a daily basis. If a better rate is available,
you'll be notified immediately via email. Try this simple tool
today.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t15/eb_jan/sig/refinance/

----------------------------------------------------------------

12. Schwab Learning Center Announces New Courses on Taxes and
Stock Investing

----------------------------------------------------------------

The Learning Center recently released two new courses -- Tax
Smart Investing and Understanding Stocks. Tax Smart Investing
covers that all-important topic of taxation and tax-efficient
investing. The new course guides you through key tax-related
factors to consider when buying, selling or holding an
investment. Understanding Stocks is designed to teach you the
fundamentals of stock characteristics and terminology. Check
out these courses and more.

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t16/eb_jan/sig/learningcenter/

----------------------------------------------------------------

13. Update: The Big Switch to Decimal Quotes

----------------------------------------------------------------

In recent months,  you may  have noticed in the newspaper that
some securities are priced in decimals rather than fractions.
This is part of a gradual conversion process in which all stocks
and their underlying options will eventually quote and trade in
decimals. The process began in phases on September 5, 2000 with
a small group of  New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) securities and
continues until January 29, 2001, when the remainder of
NYSE-listed securities will convert to decimals. Soon after,
securities traded over-the-counter (OTC) will begin a phased
conversion.  All securities and their underlying options are
planned to be converted by April 9, 2001. Your Schwab statement
and trade confirms will not change as security pricing already
appears in decimal format. For more information about
decimalization,

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t18/eb_jan/sig/decimal/

----------------------------------------------------------------

14. Wireless Technologies Video Webcast

----------------------------------------------------------------

From cell phones to the emergence of Bluetooth -- what
technological, consumer, and global issues surround the wireless
phenomenon? You're invited to tune in and participate in this
live, online, special event.

Topic:  Wireless Technology ...Today & Tomorrow
Speaker:  Panel of industry leaders including Bill Day,
Tech Evangelist, Sun Microsystems
Date/Time:  Thursday, January 25th @ 3:00pm ET, 12:00pm PT
Where: http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t19/eb_jan/sig/wireless/
(pre-registration encouraged)

----------------------------------------------------------------

15. Argus Roundtable

----------------------------------------------------------------

January 23, 2001 at 7:00pm ET Argus Roundtable gives Signature
Services clients the opportunity to interact directly with the
analysts producing some of the finest independent financial
research available today. These monthly events offer an
opportunity for investment insight that, until recently, was
typically available only to institutional investment
professionals. Please join us!

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t20/eb_jan/sig/argus/

----------------------------------------------------------------

16. Advice for Fifty Plus: Charles Schwab's New Book

----------------------------------------------------------------

In his new book, You're Fifty -- Now What? Investing for the
Second Half of Your Life (Crown Business 2001 ), Charles Schwab
helps you create a financial strategy that takes you from your
working years through retirement . "Retirement planning that may
have worked for earlier generations no longer works today," he
says. "Not only are people living longer, but they are also
healthier and more active - meaning that retirement tends to be
more costly." Schwab helps you navigate these life changes in a
clear, user-friendly style with numerous easy-to-follow
worksheets, tables and guidelines. Available in hardcover, as an
ebook, and in Random House Audiobook and Large Print Editions.

----------------------------------------------------------------

17. The Proactive Investor's Calendar

----------------------------------------------------------------

Check out our calendar of upcoming events, key economic
indicators and things to be thinking about for the month ahead.

http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t21/eb_jan/sig/calendar/

----------------------------------------------------------------

To change your email address
----------------------------------------------------------------

Log on to the page that will allow you to update your email
address securely. For your protection, we are unable to accept
instructions to change your email address sent in reply to this
message. For more information

Go to
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t22/eb_jan/sig/change/

----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, ask account service questions, or provide
feedback

----------------------------------------------------------------

The Schwab e.Bulletin is a complimentary subscription for
our clients. If you would prefer not to receive this in
the future:
1. Log on to your account.
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t23/eb_jan/sig/unsub/
2. Under "My Alerts", check the box marked "delete" next to
e.Bulletin and then click "submit".

For account service questions, please send a secure email by
logging on to your account.
http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t24/eb_jan/sig/account/

To provide feedback about Schwab's e.Bulletin, please send all
feedback directly to online.editor@schwab.com We appreciate
your comments!

----------------------------------------------------------------

The Schwab e.Bulletin mailing list is managed and used
exclusively by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. Schwab does not sell
or rent information about its customers to any third party.
Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored, and/or reviewed  by
Schwab personnel. (c)2001 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights
reserved.  Member SIPC/NYSE (0100-11823).


I knew you were waiting for this one.

Bob
>Delivered-To: mrwassoc@moe.sfrn.dnai.com
>Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
>From: "Eileen M. SmithMArch" <rulemaking@yahoo.com>
>Subject: NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES REPORT - COMMENTS FOR HEARING
>JUNE 5, 2001 AND DOCKET 00-CEO-VOL-1
>To: Michael R Jaske <mjaske@energy.state.ca.us>,
>    Aaron J Johnson <ajo@cpuc.ca.gov>, William Johnston <wej@cpuc.ca.gov>,
>    Marc D Joseph <mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>,
>    Joseph M Karp <jkarp@whitecase.com>,
>    Joseph R Kloberdanz <jkloberdanz@sempra.com>,
>    Ron Knecht <ronknecht@aol.com>,
>    Grant Kolling <grant_kolling@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us>,
>    Stephanie E Krapf <stephanie.krapf@pactel.com>,
>    John W Leslie <jleslie@luce.com>, Ronald Liebert <rliebert@cfbf.com>,
>    Karen Lindh <karen@klindh.com>, James Loewen <loe@cpuc.ca.gov>,
>    Jody London <jlondon@gralegal.com>, Martin G Lyons <mgl@cpuc.ca.gov>,
>    David Marcus <dmarcus@slip.net>, Anthony Mazy <am1@cpuc.ca.gov>,
>    Richard J McCann <rmccann@cal.net>, Barry F McCarthy
> <bmcc@mccarthylaw.com>,
>    Keith McCrea <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, Sara McKinley <smckinley@ingaa.org>,
>    Michael D Montoya <montoym1@sce.com>, Gregory Morris <gmorris@emf.net>,
>    Jay Morse <jxm@cpuc.ca.gov>, Lucina Lea Moses <lmoses@anaheim.net>,
>    Theresa L Mueller <theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us>,
>    Phillip Muller <philm@scdenergy.com>, Jeff Nahigian <jeff@jbsenergy.com>,
>    Steven C Nelson <snelson@sempra.com>, John Nimmons <jna@olywa.net>,
>    David Norris <dnorris@sppc.com>, "Arthur V O'Donnell" <aod@newsdata.com>,
>    "Edward W O'Neill" <ewo@jmbm.com>,
>    Jeffrey Ogata <jogata@energy.state.ca.us>, Arlen Orchard
> <aorchar@smud.org>,
>    Barbara Ortega <bho@cpuc.ca.gov>, Carl K Oshiro <oshirock@pacbell.net>,
>    Peter Ouborg <PXO2@PGE.com>
>Cc: Jack Pigott <jackp@calpine.com>, Edward G Poole <epoole@adplaw.com>,
>    Michael Pretto <mpretto@ci.santa-clara.ca.us>, Edwin Quan
> <eyq@cpuc.ca.gov>,
>    Edgar A Quiroz <eaq@cpuc.ca.gov>, James Ross <rcsstl@cdmnet.com>,
>    Dorothy Rothrock <rothrock@ix.netcom.com>,
>    Bruce Russell <brussel@csi.redding.ca.us>,
>    Reed V Schmidt <rschmidt@bartlewells.com>,
>    Donald Schoenbeck <dws@keywaycorp.com>,
>    Vincent Schwent <vschwent@energy.state.ca.us>,
>    Rick L Shackelford <napedersen@jonesday.com>,
>    Michael Shames <mshames@ucan.org>, Donald R Smith <sdh@cpuc.ca.gov>,
>    Eileen M Smith <RULEMAKING@yahoo.com>, Jeanne Sole <jsole@caiso.com>,
>    Rich Sperberg <rsperberg@onsitesycom.com>, James Squeri
> <jsqueri@gmssr.com>,
>    Sara Steck Meyers <ssmyers@hooked.net>, Scott T Steffen
<scottst@mid.org>,
>    Lee-Whei Tan <lwt@cpuc.ca.gov>, Zenaida G Tapawan-Conway
> <ztc@cpuc.ca.gov>,
>    Jonathan M Teague <jonathan.teague@dgs.ca.gov>,
>    Aaron Thomas <athomas@newenergy.com>,
>    Scott Tomashefsky <stomashe@energy.state.ca.us>,
>    Lana Tran <ltt@cpuc.ca.gov>, Lisa G Urick <lisa_G_Urick@calpx.com>,
>    Natalie Walsh <nfw@cpuc.ca.gov>, Alan R Watts <awattslaw@earthlink.net>,
>    James Weil <JWEIL@AGLET.ORG>, Robert B Weisenmiller <rbw@mrwassoc.com>,
>    Steven A Weissman <saw@jmbm.com>, Bradford Wetstone <bxw@cpuc.ca.gov>,
>    Rosaline White <raw@cpuc.ca.gov>, Johannes W Williams
<jwilliams@eei.org>,
>    Gregory A Wilson <gaw@cpuc.ca.gov>, Jeff Wilson <jewilson@arb.ca.gov>,
>    Christopher Witteman <chrisw@greenlining.org>
>X-Envelope-To: <rbw@mrwassoc.com>
>X-MDRemoteIP: 208.59.199.22
>X-MDRcpt-To: rbw@mrwassoc.com
>X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rbw@mrwassoc.com
>
>CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
>
>Eileen M. Smith, M.Arch. of the Solar Development
>Cooperative certifies that our comments In the Matter
>of Draft Natural Gas Infrastructure Issues Report for
>Docket Number 00-CEC-VOL-1 has been filed and served
>by electronic mail on Tuesday, June 5, 2001.  The
>document is linked and available for download in MS
>Word at the following webpage:
>http://www.geocities.com/scdres/NOGASPIPELINES.doc
>
>A hard copy original will be sent by postal service
>with two copies to be file-stamped and returned to the
>Solar Development Cooperative for our files.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Eileen M. Smith, M.Arch.
>Founder & CEO Since 1992
>SOLAR DEVELOPMENT COOPERATIVE
>3535 East Coast Highway #216
>Corona del Mar, CA  92625
>
>949-862-5826 Extension 1
>scdres@yahoo.com
>EileenMSmith2001@Excite.com
>http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/1905
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
>a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Ted,

I agree. Curve review has always been RAC responsibility. Please, let me know
if we can assist you in any way.

Vince

From:  Ted Murphy
10/29/2000 10:23 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Copper curve

Tani,
Please touch base with Lloyd Fleming as to whom from RAC should review the
methodology.  I view that it is the commercial team's responsibility to post
the curve, operations responsibility to gather objective information on the
efficacy of the curve on a (minimum) monthly basis and report all highly
sensitive curves, RAC will not approve or disapprove a curve but question
methodology/motivations and subsequent changes and do so in a senior
management forum (i.e., we will tell on those who have suspect curves or
curve movements).  Obviously, we are looking for the best estimate of the
value of those products in those time buckets TODAY, we also favor object,
consistent application of methodoology intra and inter commodity.
Ted

Vince J Kaminski
10/27/2000 04:18 PM
To: Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Harry Tefoglou/LON/ECT@ECT, Esther
Gerratt/LON/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Copper curve

Tani,

No problem. We shall look at the curve on Monday. I have organized a  small
team to examine
the curve from different perspectives.

Curve validation is normally a RAC prerogative and I shall get them involved
on Monday

Vince

Tani Nath
10/27/2000 11:40 AM
To: Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson, Harry Tefoglou/LON/ECT@ECT, Esther Gerratt/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Copper curve

Following Steve's note to you earlier today, I wanted to mention that we have
a fairly urgent need for review of the copper curve in particular, as there
is a deal due for final pricing in the next few days.

I am not sure what data you have received from Enron Metals in London, so I
am asking Tim Poullain-Patterson to ensure that you have the curves and the
economic justification proposed as soon as possible.  Please direct any
questions to him or to Harry Tefoglou.  I will be in the Tokyo office next
week, but available via e-mail.

Thanks in advance for your assistance,

Tani


----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 09/11/2000 04:32 PM -----

	"Lee Hanse" <lhanse@br-inc.com>
	09/11/2000 01:50 PM
	Please respond to lhanse

		 To: <Mwhitt@enron.com>, "Chris Hoekenga" <choekenga@br-inc.com>, "Sylvia
Reza" <sreza@br-inc.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lost Creek Agreements

   Mark - update on the agreements.  They are still on Bobby's desk waiting
his
signature.  I went to check on them and his sec said he is not even scheduled
in the office until the 21st.  They said he may be in on Saturday the 16th -
if so, he will sign them then.  Please forward this update to whom ever needs
it in your shop.
   Sorry for the delay, he hasn't been in the office much at all.  FYI,  Lee H


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football299.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Attention Fantasy Players! Cant find that perfect gift? Let MVP.com make it easy for you! Save 10% on your next purchase when you purchase a Gift Certificate from now until 12/27/01. Click Here for Details.

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1218e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1218c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1218v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1218t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1218ftl.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Jeff Graham, WR SD - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Graham probably won't play Sunday at Kansas City because of the death of his father in a car accident, coach Mike Riley said Friday. If Graham doesn't play, Trevor Gaylor will start in his place and Nate Turner will be signed off the practice squad. The Chargers are already missing their No. 3 receiver, Tim Dwight, due to complications of a collapsed lung.

Antowain Smith, RB NE - JWillie Updated 12/23/01

Smith rushed for a career-high 156 yards and a touchdown Saturday. He has been one of the best runners in the AFC and will help carry your team to Fantasy glory.

Steve McNair, QB TEN - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
McNair played Saturday despite suffering from back spasms all week. He played well, throwing a touchdown pass in the second half. Expect him to be a solid No. 1 QB.

Jeff Garcia, QB SF - JWillie Updated 12/23/01

Garcia, whose practice time was limited all week, played in Saturday's game. He admitted afterwards that he has a cracked rib. He played with extra padding, saying it didn't greatly affect his throws. Garcia might not be at full strength in the remaining weeks but he will still be a solid No. 1 Fantasy QB.

Eddie George, RB TEN - Tori Updated 12/23/01
George played in Saturday's game despite suffering from an ankle injury. He left in the third quarter because of a neck injury but returned to the game.

Oronde Gadsden, WR MIA - Matty Updated 12/23/01

Gadsden did not play in Saturday's game against the Patriots because of a hamstring injury. Chris Chambers started in his absence.

Fred Beasley, RB SF - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Beasley broke his right hand. He will probably be sidelined for the rest of the regular season.

Joe Horn, WR NO - Matty Updated 12/21/01
Horn is once again performing like an elite Fantasy receiver. He is a must-start player during the final weeks of the NFL season.

Maurice Smith, RB ATL - Frank Updated 12/21/01
A banged-up Smith hasn't done much statistically in recent weeks. Don't depend on him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Donald Hayes, WR CAR - Martin Updated 12/21/01
Hayes may step back into the forefront this week as the No. 1 wideout in place of Muhsin Muhammad. He isn't very explosive, however, and won't help Fantasy teams much during Weeks 15 through 17.

Chris Weinke, QB CAR - Tori Updated 12/21/01
Consider Weinke as a backup during the Fantasy playoffs. He lacks the weapons to post better-than-average numbers, but he is a good option if you need an emergency QB.

Kurt Warner, QB STL - Hunter Updated 12/21/01
Warner should guide many Fantasy teams to success during the playoffs. Expect fine numbers from him the rest of the way.

Rich Gannon
, QB OAK - Martin Updated 12/21/01
Gannon has been a top-flight Fantasy QB this year. He will be a key player on many title teams, and should never be benched.

Randy Moss, WR MIN - Russell Updated 12/21/01
Moss started off slow this season but has once again been one of the best wideouts. Don't hesitate to start him during your playoff run.

Marvin Minnis, WR KC - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01

Minnis hasn't done much to help Fantasy owners this year. Don't use him during the remaining weeks of the NFL season.

Michael Westbrook, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Westbrook has been inconsistent this season as a Fantasy player. He will be a good No. 2 at best during your playoffs.

Rod Gardner, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Gardner has been very inconsistent this season. Unless you play in a deeper league, starting Gardner isn't advisable.

Tony Richardson, RB KC - Neal/McKay Updated 12/21/01
Richardson hasn't been a consistent scoring threat this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Tony Gonzalez, TE KC - Russell Updated 12/21/01
Gonzalez hasn't played as well as expected this year. Still, he is too talented to bench during the Fantasy playoffs.

Brett Favre, QB GB - Frank Updated 12/21/01

Favre has been one of the best QBs this season. Count on him to help lead your team to Fantasy glory.

Trent Green, QB KC - Bass/Hull Updated 12/21/01
Green has been an inconsistent Fantasy QB this year. He is a risky start during the rest of the season.

Bill Schroeder, WR GB - Frank Updated 12/21/01
Schroeder has had a solid season. Look for him to be a reliable No. 2 wideout during your postseason.

Matt Hasselbeck, QB SEA - Bass/Hull Updated 12/21/01
Hasselbeck has been a big disappointment this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy postseason.

Johnnie Morton, WR DET - Hunter Updated 12/21/01
Morton has been inconsistent this season but he will still be a solid No. 2 during the Fantasy playoffs. Keep him in your lineup.

Reggie Wayne, WR IND - Free Agent
Updated 12/21/01
Wayne is healthy again, and showing signs of improvement. But he is not accomplishing enough statistically to help most Fantasy teams.

Amani Toomer, WR NYG - Tori Updated 12/21/01
Toomer is having a bit of a down year, but his potential to post solid Fantasy numbers makes him worth considering. He should be a solid No. 2 wideout during your playoffs.

Marvin Harrison, WR IND - Russell Updated 12/21/01

Harrison will be an important Fantasy player during the final weeks of the NFL season. He will have some good outings, even though the Colts are not in the playoff race.

Duce Staley, RB PHI - Giggles Updated 12/21/01
Staley started to play well late in the season. Be sure to keep him into your starting lineup. He will be an adequate back for the playoffs.

Shawn Bryson, RB BUF - Neal/McKay Updated 12/21/01

Bryson will start in place of the injured Travis Henry this week. Consider him as a No. 2 RB if you need help at that spot.

James Thrash, WR PHI - Frank Updated 12/21/01
Thrash was not very consistent during the regular season and may not catch a lot of TD passes in the final games of the NFL regular season. He will be a No. 2 wideout at best during the Fantasy playoffs.

More Updates

Schedule, Breakdown

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


UT Fall Trustees Meeting.  Also scheduleing the Connally Center Grand Opening
events that weekend.  Agenda to follow.  You have a room at the Four Seasons
Hotel in Austin for the nights of the 10th and 11th.  Confirmation #235205.


Please set up the following contract in Sitara

Pipeline CGAS
Seller  CGAS
Buyer  Commonwealth Atlantic Limited Partnership
Firmness Firm
Type  Off-Peak Firm Transport
Rate Sched OPT
Term  1/1/2000 - 7/7/2000
CALP pays all the bills from the pipeline.

Comments:  Commonwealth Atlantic Limited Partnership is not setup as a
counterparty in global.  However, we used CES CALP EXCHANGE as the
counterparty for our exchange deal tickets.  CALP was a CES deal and they
have not signed the agency agreement yet.  Let me know if you need any
additional info from me.

I will be out Wednesday buy you can call Scott Goodell at my desk.