Please see the attached.  AA is now unsure about what we should say here (as
am I).  Can you help?  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 04/18/2000
09:24 AM ---------------------------

Aurora Dimacali
04/18/2000 07:49 AM
To: Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Harry Walters/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Allen Joe/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: PCB costs

Below is our footnote regarding the PCB costs (TW), howeverm, Lou Soldano
indicated on his memo to Susan Scott that these are not "decontamination
costs".   Can you please clarify this matter as our Auditors (AA) are waiting
for our final draft this morning.  They will not sign off until we cleared
this matter.  Please respond so we can get a signoff.  Thanks

Transwestern incurred and continues to incur certain costs related to
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) that migrated into one of its customer,s
facilities through use of a PCB-based lubricant.  Because of the continued
detection of PCBs near Transwestern,s Topock station, Transwestern continues
to take measures to contain the PCBs at a cost of $7.3 million in 1999 and an
estimated cost of $4.2 million in 2000.

Aurora

---------------------- Forwarded by Aurora Dimacali/ET&S/Enron on 04/18/2000
07:43 AM ---------------------------

04/14/2000 05:24 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
04/14/2000 05:24 PM
04/14/2000 05:24 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Aurora Dimacali/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: PCB costs

these are not "decontamination costs."   they are anticpated costs assocaited
with the PG&E Operating Agreement.  I don't think any of these costs are true
Decontamiantion costs...

let me know if you have any questions....thx

	From:  Susan Scott                           04/05/2000 09:40 AM

To: Aurora Dimacali/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: PCB costs

Here is the breakdown of 1999 PCB decontamination costs for TW:

Topock mods   $4,675,000
PG&E sample taps  $     90,000
PG&E filter separator  $   600,000
Remove PG&E filter separator $     10,000

If you need the costs broken down in more detail, or need more information,
please give me a call at x30596.


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000080435&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000080435
Approver            : phillip.m.love@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/7/02 9:45:46 AM
Requested For       : kim.wilbanks@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\ERMS\1intra - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


Harvard Business School is doing a 5-year business case study on Enron.
Below  is the information that I have regarding their visit.   The name of
the case study is Modern Giants (attached below)

(They are interested in developing a clearer picture of the architecture and
design of Enron,s organization, products, and services--how the company and
its key businesses have been put together and how they work on a daily,
quarterly, and annual basis.)

mm
x31641

----- Forwarded by Melinda McCarty/Corp/Enron on 01/26/2001 01:40 PM -----

1. An overview of the Modern Giants research project

2. Descriptions of three broad areas of research interest (business and
organizational design, new business creation, and capital investment
decision making) together with the associated interview questions.

We fully understand that these interview questions are far too
encompassing, and that there's no way we could get through all of them in a
single, one-hour meeting. What we plan to do is "specialize" the interviews
by the background and expertise of participants. In some cases, we will
focus only on new business creation; in others, we will focus primarily on
the allocation of capital; in others we will focus on the basic economic
model that underlies the trading or energy services business. Future visits
may focus on the remaining, unanswered questions, or on other areas of
interest of our faculty colleagues. These questions should therefore be
regarded more as a set of interests, rather than a strict protocol that we
will strive to complete from beginning to end.
Hope this provides the necessary background for the trip.

 - RESEARCH INITIATIVE ON MODERN GIANTS.doc
 - Bower.doc
 - Levesque.doc
 - Roberto.doc
 - BusOrgDes.doc
 - NewBusCrea.doc
 - Capital Investment.doc

 - Garvin4.doc


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 01:22
PM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/06/2000 01:04:31 PM
To: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: areynaud@coral-energy.com, dwhaley@coral-energy.com,
jlshepherd@coral-energy.com, TSeigler@coral-energy.com

Subject: Revised Letter Agreement

Attached is a revised draft of the Letter Agreement between ENA and
Tejas which has been marked to show the changes from the November 30
draft prepared by ENA.

 - 5WLNS01_.DOC


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000 04:33 PM -----

	John Viverito@ENRON
	08/16/2000 04:51 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: ISDA Documents

Hi Mark-

Hope all is well.

Attached you will find an e-mail that I sent to Alan regarding ISDA
documentation, for which I need approval from Houston.  Alan has informed me
that he left you a voicemail on this subject and I was hoping you could
provide me with guidance as to whom I should contact to obtain approval.

By separate e-mail, I will be forwarding weather derivative GTC's for use on
EOL with Enron Japan Corp. as the Enron counterparty.  Please also advise who
I should be in contact with to obtain the requisite approval for these GTC's,
as well.

Best regards,

John
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 08/16/2000 04:40 AM -----

	John Viverito
	08/14/2000 03:30 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON
		 Subject: ISDA Documents

Alan-

Attached hereto, are marked-up copies of the following ISDA documents (based
on the US versions) which have been prepared using the credit worksheet for
The Mitsui Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Limited, in conjunction with B&M:

ISDA Schedule,
CSA and
Enron Corp. Guarantee.

The footnotes will disappear when the changes to the document are accepted.
It will be relatively straight forward to revise these for other
counterparties
such as IBJ and Sanwa, which apparently have the same credit rating.  I note
that we have not yet received the credit work sheet for IBJ or Sanwa.

Please note:

1.  There are still a number of "options" in the documents which I have not
completed as I am unsure as to the desired outcome.  These are indicated in
square
brackets.  Please let me know how you would like to deal with these;

2.   It will be important to make sure that the documents are carefully
checked to ensure that we have properly incorporated the various elections in
the documents;

3.   The agreements are governed by New York law and we should ensure that
appropriate counsel reviews same;and

4.   A number of features in the agreements (particularly the requirement for
a legal opinion and the use of L/Cs as form of collateral) are not common in
Japan and are likely to meet resistance from our counterparties.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

John


When: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:00 AM-12:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US
& Canada).
Where: TBA

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


do you have an extra glove?  also let me know where the game is at tues.
what is the next game you are going in for?


- execsummary.PDF


The following points highlight legal/regulatory recommendations to the
business team on the DA suspension issue.

All intelligence indicates that the CPUC will act on this issue at its June
28, 2001 meeting (and there are sufficient votes for the decision).
Existing Contracts - It is our recommendation that EES should submit any and
all DASRs to initiate DA service  to the appropriate Utility no later than
June 29, 2001 for all customers that have existing contracts if we want to
ensure DA service.
New Contracts - All new contracts should be signed by both EES and the
customer no later than June 30, 2001 (July 1, 2001 is a Sunday).  DASRs for
these contracts should be submitted to the appropriate Utility as soon as
possible, but in no event later than July 6, 2001.  The July 6 date is our
estimate of the last date the Utility would accept DASRs for new contracts.
It is important to note that the CPUC is keeping the clock on contract
execution timing.
Switching Option - Customers that are on DA service can be returned to the
Utility per the tariff process.  Once the customer has been returned to
Utility service after July 1, 2001, our expectation is that there will be no
ability to have this customer receive DA service in a future timeframe.  In
addition, returning to Utility service may incur a "re-entry fee".
Contract Extensions - EES should consider amending all current contracts that
terminate after July 1, 2001 with a Evergreen Provision that provides for
Index pricing with 30 day cancellation notice provisions.  These amendments
should be signed prior to June 30, 2001.  It is possible that the CPUC will
require marketers to detail the termination dates of their DA customers.  One
additional thought - EES may consider having the customer assign any Negative
CTC receivable to EES as compensation for the Evergreen provision (to
overcome the CPUC language that indicates that the customer is due the
Negative CTC credit).

We intend to set up a call for 5pm Houston time today to discuss (call-in
number to follow).

Jim


Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

The ISO has posted the CPUC subpoena on its website at
http://www.caiso.com/docs/2000/07/26/2000072610262610454.pdf
<http://www.caiso.com/docs/2000/07/26/2000072610262610454.pdf>   As stated
in a message forwarded yesterday to market participants and scheduling
coordinators, the CPUC has agreed to extend the deadline for a reply to
Friday July 28, although the ISO has been informed today that the extension
is only until NOON on Friday.  In addition, the ISO discussed the reference
to an affidavit in the subpoena with the CPUC and was informed that this
results from a typo which will be corrected in a corrected document sent by
federal express to the ISO yesterday (the words attached affidavit will be
replaced with the word attachments).  The ISO has accepted federal express
service of the subpoena.

The ISO has raised confidentiality concerns with the CPUC and the CPUC
agreed to circulate a draft of a confidentiality agreement to the ISO today.
The ISO will forward the draft to market participants and scheduling
coordinators as soon as we receive it.  Once again the ISO reiterates to
market participants that to the extent they have outstanding issues as to
the subpoena, these should be raised directly with the appropriate entity.
The ISO intends to comply with the subpoena on Friday unless it receives a
legally sufficient communication to the contrary from the CPUC or a court.

Finally, a few market participants have requested that the ISO make
available several letters forwarded to the EOB discussing confidential
treatment.  These letters are attached.

Questions should be directed to Jeanne M. Sol, at 916-608-7144.

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - 7-24DRAFT LETTER TO EOB FROM ISO_1.doc
 - 7-25eobsubOFFER.doc