Company Sleuth Daily Report
==========================
Company Sleuth is a registered trademark of Infonautics, Inc. (Nasdaq: INFO) or its subsidiaries.
-----------------------------

Special Notice:
-----------------------------
Coming Soon ...
Company Sleuth Research Library

    We understand it is important for you to know what decisions your Stakeout companies have made and what they are planning for the future.  Having access to this information can help you anticipate the potential impact on their stock performance.

    That's why we are introducing the Company Sleuth Research Library, one of the most powerful research resources available to individual investors.

    With the Company Sleuth Research Library, you will be empowered to search over 10 million articles from top domestic and international media sources to find the company, industry, market or general information you need.

    This service can only be found at Company Sleuth, providing yet another unique investment resource that sets it apart from other investment sites.

    Look for the Company Sleuth Research Library to be part of the upcoming subscription service.  With the subscription service, you will gain access to the most current, relevant information and research tools to help you make more informed strategic decisions on your investments.

    As a subscriber, you will have access to all of Company Sleuth services, including the following:
    ?	A Stakeout list so you can track new findings on up to 50 companies
    ?	Over 25 in-depth company reports
    ?	Ability to conduct searches through the Company Sleuth Research Library
    ?	Email notifications to alert you to the new findings on your Stakeout companies
    ?	Plus more

    Once available, you can subscribe for this new service and begin your subscription with a FREE 14-day trial. If you choose not to subscribe, your account will be shifted to a limited access membership status with restricted use of the Company Sleuth services.

    Watch the site and your email for more information on how to sign up for the subscription service.  Click here <http://www.companysleuth.com/snapshot_demo.cfm> for a sample of the new Snapshot page.

------------------------------
This is your Personal Company Sleuth Report for Thursday May 24, 2001.
-------------------------------
Your Stakeout Companies
-------------------------------
Here are the new items Company Sleuth found on your stakeout companies last night.

Enron Corp. (ENE)
	Raging Bull Msg.................16
	Yahoo Msg.......................39
	Analyst Rating..................1
	Domains.........................1
	Motley Fool Msg.................20
	Insider Trades..................1
	TVAlerts........................1
	Rabbitt Ratings.................2
	CNBC Msg........................80
	To view this company's report, go to:
	http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?actiontype=6&username=WMSON&ticker=ENE

About Company Sleuth
--------------------
"?Company Sleuth electronically tracks companies of your choosing on what's called the Stakeout List. The Stakeout List includes some obscurities such as domain name registrations and patents as well as more run-of-the-mill information such as insider trades, news, and broker reports. The number of message board postings on a stock is displayed in a chart, indicating whether the buzz is heating up or petering out. You don't even need to visit the site regularly-Company Sleuth will e-mail the results so you can pick and choose what to read."
- "13 Sites That Put You Above The Crowd" by Paul Barr, OnlineInvestor, November 2000

Customize Company Sleuth
------------------------
CompanySleuth has revised its Privacy Policy.  Click here  http://www.companysleuth.com/privacy.cfm to view the revised Privacy Policy.

Cancel E-mail
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=1

Contact Company Sleuth
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=2

Change Stakeout Companies
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=3

Modify E-mail Content
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=4

Change to HTML E-mail
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=5

Company Sleuth is a registered trademark of Infonautics, Inc. (Nasdaq: INFO) or its subsidiaries.
Copyright 2000 Infonautics Corporation http://www.infonautics.com


This will replace our Monday Origination meeting.  Come prepared to provide a 5 minute update of your activities (those work related...).

Thanx,
Laura


The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.  Please review.

Owner: Christopher J Gaskill
Report Name: Gaskill111301
Days In Mgr. Queue: 8


Hello John!  I appreciate the recommendation, but I am not in the position right now to make a move.  If they are interested in discussing a position here in the NW, I would be more interested in that.  I hope everything is going well for you.

Keep in touch!

Diana

-----Original Message-----
From: Malowney, John [mailto:john.malowney@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Staying in touch

Diana; last week my boss and I met with Sean regarding a position within
PG&E similar to what you're currently doing.  PG&E would be very interested
talking to you but the catch is the job is located in Bethesda Maryland.
Are you at all interested, and secondly would you and Sean consider residing
in Bethesda performing the exact same function you are both performing
today?  The second option is a long shot but I wanted to run it by you.
Hopefully you had a pleasant Holiday.   John

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


You need to give me a boottle in a  brown bag.

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 09/01/2000 08:52:15 AM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Phone Call

There are a ton of parks around with nice, little benches.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 9:25 AM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: RE: Phone Call

I thought I would sleep in the car, or maybe a shelter.

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 09/01/2000 08:04:28 AM

To:   "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Phone Call

So where are you going to stay... the floor is available.... it's got
carpet.

I really appreciate your help!!!!!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 8:31 AM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: Re: Phone Call

I reserved a one-way ticket on Continental last night for 6:45am Tuesday,
19th.  It cost $263.00 and its completly refundable.  Sounds good to me.
I told the reservation lady that I was thinking about buying 2 tickets and
just get my money back for the one I don't use.  I would buy one leaving
Monday evening and the one for Tuesday morning

COOL, don't you think?

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 09/01/2000 06:15:24 AM

To:   "'Germany, Chris'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Phone Call

Sorry... I didn't call last night.

I was working on my September spreadsheet for TCO at home. I was going to
take a break and call you and my parents... but I had to get the
spreadsheet
done for the long weekend. I finished it at 1:30 am. Thought this would be
too late to call.

Hopefully the weekend scheduling goes smooth, so I can work on August
Accounting this afternoon. I'm just extemely slow at everything right now.

Let's talk this afternoon.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Andy - I may join by phone, depending on logistics this afternoon.  I'll let you know.


Ina, I can't seem to find the expense deposit for the SW Bell charges in my
account.  Will you please contact them again and ask them for a copy of the
check?  Thank you so much.

Mike


----- Original Message -----
From: Michael D. Baselice <mikeb@baselice.com>
To: George Postolos (E-mail) <georgep@rocketball.com>; Angela Blakeney
(E-mail) <angelab@rocketball.com>; Dave Walden (E-mail) <savont@msn.com>;
Glenn Smith (E-mail) <gsmith@pstrategies.com>; Dale Laine (E-mail)
<dlaine@pstrategies.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:49 AM
Subject: SORRY EVERYONE! Attached are the timeline charts thru Nov 1st
interviewing

MICHAEL BASELICE
Baselice & Associates, Inc.
4131 Spicewood Springs Road
Suite O-2
Austin, TX  78759
Phone: (512) 345-9720
Fax: (512) 345-9740
email: mikeb@baselice.com

 - 290NOV1.ppt


GLOBAL RISK MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS
						    PRESENTS

			   THE NEW EXECUTIVE REPORTS VIEWER

					         http://erv.corp.enron.com

The Global Risk Management Operations group has redesigned the Executive Reports Viewer website to be more efficient and robust enough to accomodate the growing number of reports and users utilizing the viewer.

The Viewer's new functionality includes:

-An easier to view home page with all reports grouped by Business Unit
-Enhanced security features allowing publisher's to assign security to sections of a report
-Capability of directly emailing the publisher of a report with any questions
-Improved ability to access reports using links and a calendar function
-Comprehensive list of publishers for all reports
-Email notification to viewers when reports are published
-Business links connecting you to industry websites for additional market information
-Report history up to one year, opposed to the former 30 day limit

The old website will close down on July 23rd.  Reports will be published to both sites until then.

Please contact Chris Abel, x33102, Anita Luong, x36753 or Shona Wilson, x39123, with any questions.

If you would like a personal walk thru, please contact Pamela Sonnier, at x37531.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE  Merchant Power Monthly     ........................   Download Free Sample Issue .....   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    Dick Cheney says we need a new powerplant every week.   In just this month's issue, we have over 9,000 MW of new plants documented!    -  - Plus, the records on who owns each plant, their corporate structure, ownership changes and even foreign plants.  Gleaned from FERC filings, we also provide you the docket number for each plant, so you can follow up and pull full documentation on any which are of interest-- free!  We also provide you with feature stories on plants in progress from around the nation.   SPECIAL OFFER:   Order Merchant Power Monthly for only $196/year ($295/year if you require hardcopy) and receive FREE all of the back-issues of this millenium (in pdf format).   Every Exempt Wholesale Generator, Qualifying Facility, Power Marketer Filing, since January 2000, and start your subscription in January 2002, for only $196!!!   Save even more with a corporate pdf site license.  Only $1,000 for distribution to your entire company!  Keep it on your server for access as required, rebroadcast it yourself, or give us the list of recipients and let us take care of delivery for you-- your choice!   FOR THIS SPECIAL OFFER, YOU MUST ORDER BEFORE DECEMBER 30!   For a sample issue, download: http://www.pmaconference.com/0112MPM.pdf  email:  info@pmaconference.com   voice: 201 784 5389                 [IMAGE]  This email was sent to don.baughman@enron.com, at your request, by PowerMarketers.com .    Visit our Subscription Center to edit  your interests or unsubscribe .  View our privacy policy .   Powered by  Constant Contact


Tana,

Just a follow up.  Did you happen to receive the above from Steve Hotte of
ETS?  If so, has a copy been forwarded to Pan Handle Eastern Pipeline co?


Mark:  Cargill is asking us to execute with Cargill's agent a document
permitting the agent to act for Cargill online and offline with respect to
financial trades.  Will we permit?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 02:15 PM -----

	Caroline Abramo@ENRON
	02/28/2001 12:31 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: POA

---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
01:28 PM ---------------------------

Caroline Abramo
02/28/2001 12:28 PM
To: Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron
cc: Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, /HOU/ECT, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: POA

Wendi/Sara-

This is a Power of Attorney agreement for Global Advisors.. The mentioned
traders will be executing on behalf of Cargill Incorporated...

Can you please go through this ASAP and let me know if anything in here is
problematic...

They would also like this to govern EOL transactions... will this be a
problem?

Thanks very much.

Regards,
Caroline Abramo
212 702 3910
---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
01:20 PM ---------------------------

Joe_Lardy@cargill.com on 02/28/2001 11:51:16 AM
To: Caroline.Abramo@enron.com
cc:

Subject: RE: POA

What timing, I was just addressing the email to you.  The POA is
attached

-----Original Message-----
From: Caroline.Abramo@enron.com [mailto:Caroline.Abramo@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:47 AM
To: lardy, joe /xtwn
Subject: POA

Joe- whenever you can send.. I'll get my legal going on it...

Thanks and Regards,
Caroline

 - enron.doc


We would like to change the Netco directory name to UBS.

We will have to change the links to the NGP&L and anything else that links to files in Netco.  Let me know this morning if that will be a major problem for anyone.

Thanks


You may have seen this when it first came out a while back ... but it's worth
a rerun.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 06/13/2001
01:49 PM ---------------------------
From: Ann M Schmidt on 06/13/2001 01:49 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: California's dim bulbs

California's dim bulbs
P J O Rourke

04/01/2001
Regulation
64
Copyright (c) 2001 Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights
reserved. Copyright Cato Institute Spring 2001

THE FINAL WORD
CALIFORNIA IS IN THE MIDST OF AN ENORmous stupidity crisis. Californians have
been sitting in the dark because ... they didn't turn the lights on.
They say they're short of electricity. Yes, they are. Between 1988 and 1998,
California's electricity consumption increased by 15 percent. Meanwhile
California's capacity to generate electricity shrank by five percent, even as
the state hesitated to build new power lines to tap into neighboring states'
power supplies.
Californians didn't want dams across their rivers, derricks on their ocean,
power lines across their borders, or fossil fuel smoke in their sky. These
might interfere with all the smart things Californians do, such as
hang-glide. California was going to rely on "negawatts" - dramatic power
conservation. (But California regulators put price controls on electricity
that lowered prices, and even Californians weren't dumb enough to skip a
bargain.) And California was going to rely on alternative power generation.
With all the puffery from Silicon Valley dot.com start-ups, wind farms
wouldn't be a problem. And doesn't Gwyneth Paltrow's star shine bright enough
to operate a solar panel? But it turns out that alternative power generation
is an alternative, mostly, to generating power.
Californians are people who insist on growing their own vegetables, but they
won't dig up the pretty lawn, won't plant anything for fear of getting dirty,
and they use fragrant bath salts from The Body Shop instead of smelly
compost. Let them make their crudites with crab grass. President Bush was
wrong to grant an extension of executive orders requiring out-of-state
utilities to supply power to California. And everyone is wrong to listen to
Californians whine about electricity deregulation.
There never was any deregulation. The California Public Utilities Commission
merely changed its regulations, which apparently weren't stupid enough to
meet Golden State standards. Under California's 1996 re-regulation plan,
electric companies sold their generating plants and became distributors. They
were required to buy their power on the wholesale spot market and forbidden
to enter into any long-term power supply contracts. Retail electricity prices
were lowered by 10 percent and frozen at the new rate until March 2002.
This is like requiring A&P to sell you porterhouse at $2 a pound, no matter
what the price of beef on the hoof. Imagine how many steaks there would be,
and how many supermarkets. Go to one of those boarded-up grocery stores,
purchase a phantom T-bone, screw it into a ceiling fixture, and try to light
your house. You're in California.
Californians devised a system of electricity sales that ignored every
dimension of the free market. (Interesting that the "Information Economy" is
centered in a place that's immune to information.) The free market is a
yardstick, and Californians got smacked with it. Mideast oil jitters, cold
weather, natural gas price spikes, and the plain unpredictable freedom of the
free market caused wholesale electricity costs to rise and California
utilities to go $12 billion into the red.
California's governor Gray Davis responded with the full force of bikini
beach brain. In a January 8 speech to the state legislature, Davis proposed
creating a state agency to buy generating plants and build new ones. He
threatened to expropriate power generators and transmission grids. He called
for laws to allow criminal prosecution of wholesale suppliers who withheld
electricity from California markets. And he said the state's universities and
community colleges would build co-generating plants and become energy
independent. (With gas produced by the cafeteria food?) Gray Davis sounded
like Joseph Stalin with the IQ of Keanu Reeves. "Everyone should understand
that there are other, more drastic measures that I am prepared to take if I
have to," Davis declaimed.
"Take" is the key word. Grabby Californians tried to regulate themselves into
some cheap electricity. Hoggish California power companies went along because
the stateimposed retail price ceiling was also a retail price floor.
According to the Los Angeles Times, during the first 28 months of the scheme,
Pacific Gas and Electric and California Edison made $20 billion from the
legally required mark-up between wholesale and retail electric prices.
Californians want to snatch that money back. "Consumer advocates around
California... said it did not matter that the utilities were returning
investments to their shareholders," reported the January 31 Washington Post.
"They took the money and ran," said state senator John Burton. As opposed to
Californians, who took the electricity and roller-bladed? Now the juice and
the jack are both gone, and the California legislature has had to pass a bill
authorizing $10 billion to try to clean up the mess.
But the Californians could still pull a scam. The bill mandates long-term
power contracts at rates that are way above what future prices should be. The
hope, one guesses, is that Congress, or the President, or somebody will let
the state skip out on those contracts once the costs are lower.
It would be wrong to call Californians stupid. They're sleazy, too.
R J. O'Rourke is the Cato Institute's H. L. Mencken Research Fellow and is
foreign affairs desk chief for Rolling Stone. He is author of several
bestselling books, including Parliament of Whores, Give War a Chance, Age and
Guile, and Eat the Rich.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


The testing on this starts tommorrow.  Please make sure that this is done
today.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000
10:47 AM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
12/13/2000 04:50 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Physical Trader Matrix

I am sending the physical trader matrix for another update from risk.  I have
added a column called 'Sitara Risk Assignment Desk' and populated the cells
in yellow with what Sitara uses now when assigning hedges.

Please update the list with the Sitara Risk Assignment Desk and also review
the cells I populated to ensure accuracy.

Thank you for all of your help.  Let me know if you have any further
questions.

Dawn
3-9353


All:

attached is the summary of issues for 06/05/01.

Due to the inclimate weather in Sugarland I was not able to issue the report on time.  Sorry for the delay.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001 12:32 PM ---------------------------

"Ryan Lee" <ralee@rmi.net> on 04/27/2001 12:28:28 PM
To:	"Nick Woods \(E-mail\)" <lusciouswoods@yahoo.com>, <matthew.lenhart@enron.com>, "Jayson Gill" <dodebag@hotmail.com>, "Jason Klimek" <klimjas@chrobinson.com>, "JAKE Istnick" <jakeistnick@hotmail.com>, "Haig Newton" <hnewton@analytic-solutions.com>, "David Shaw" <davidishaw@yahoo.com>, <danielkbrock@hotmail.com>, "Claude.Aldridge" <Claude.Aldridge@yellowglobal.com>, "Brian Beggs" <brbeggs@hotmail.com>, "Andy Patton" <andy.patton@wcom.com>
cc:

Subject:	Coors fiels Baby!

Welcome to the D-town.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee, Ryan" <ryan.lee@iccx.net>
To: <ralee@rmi.net>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:06 AM
Subject: FW: Pac bell (Sf)

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mcwhite, John [mailto:JMcwhite@BreeceHill.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:07 AM
> To: 'St. D'; 'Stan'; Lee, Ryan; 'Donnay'; 'Cox'; 'Red Eye'; Williams,
> Zach; 'Klimek'; 'Vic'
> Subject: FW: Pac bell (Sf)
>
>
> This is what all baseball games need. It would add a little excitement.
> Check out these chicks they are flashing the fans
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brent Ryerson [SMTP:BrentR@ecollege.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:50 AM
> > To: 'Mcwhite, John'
> > Subject: FW: Pac bell (Sf)
> >
> > these chics were flasing the crowd, then the ball players started
watching
> > start with pic #4
> >
> > heading out of town
> > enjoy the game this weekend, this should inspire YOU JOHNNY!!!
> >
> > RYER
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McDaniel, Patrick [mailto:PMcDaniel@dlj.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:35 AM
> > To: Brent Ryerson
> > Subject: FW:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fraher, John
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:55 AM
> > To: McDaniel, Patrick; Iturrino, Renzo; Donlon, Paul; Taffe, Patrick
> > Subject: FW:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > John M. Fraher
> > Private Client Services
> > Credit   | First
> > Suisse | Boston
> > DLJ Securities Corporation
> > 600 California Street, 20th Floor
> > San Francisco, CA 94108
> > Tel:   415-249-2285
> > Fax:  415-249-2237
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Platt, Mark [mailto:mplatt@pacgrow.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:35 AM
> > To: Cuffee (E-mail); Damon Williams (E-mail); Jman (E-mail); Jimmy
> > Connelly (E-mail); Mark Chielpegian (E-mail); Mike Reinardy (E-mail)
> > Cc: Matt McMahon (E-mail)
> > Subject: FW:
> >
> >
> > these are the chicks from that game we were at INSANE RACKS,,,,,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Perkins, Ben
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:30 AM
> > > To: Milstein, George; Swindle, Chris; Stone, KC; Mulcahy, Mark; Platt,
> > > Mark; Harrison, Sandy; Schatz, Steve; Svendsen, Peter; Alger, Brian
> > > Subject: FW:
> > >
> > > A little raw SF talent at PacBell
> > >
> > > _______________________________________
> > > Ben Perkins
> > > Associate
> > > Investment Banking
> > > Pacific Growth Equities
> > > Four Maritime Plaza
> > > San Francisco, CA 94111
> > > ph (415) 274-6895
> > > fax (415) 274-6849
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  <<flash3.JPG>>  <<flash1.JPG>>  <<flash2.JPG>>  <<barry_group.JPG>>
> >
> >  <<flash3.JPG>>  <<flash1.JPG>>  <<flash2.JPG>>  <<barry_group.JPG>>
>
>

 - flash3.JPG
 - flash1.JPG
 - flash2.JPG
 - barry_group.JPG


Forgive the length, but it was a long couple of days.  Apologies in advance,
since I'm sure I've missed something.  Hopefully, it hits the highlights and
gives a good flavor.  Please foreward to anyone I've inadvertently missed.
Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Best,
Jeff


Tana

Great idea - here's our latest ISDA schedule (note the changes to law,
process agent, notices, tax reps, etc)

If you work with Ian, that would be grand

TooToo

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 28/02/2001 17:43
---------------------------

Matthew Dawson
28/02/2001 16:51
To: Nicola Beales/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: ISDA schedule

Here is e the Ectric schedule Template- please note ED'S   emails relating to
Conditions Precedent and the Eligible Swap Participant  Changes after the
implementation of the  U.S trading legislation, the name of which momentarily
escapes me!!

M


Tana:

AM Gas Marketing Corp. is NOT authorized to trade US power -- restricted by
credit.

****************

Utilicorp United Inc. is authorized to trade US power -- profile is unchanged.

NRG Power Marketing Inc. is authorized to trade US power pursuant to the
on-line GTCs.

Leslie


FYI....
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
07:09 PM ---------------------------

Errol McLaughlin@ENRON
01/31/2001 06:52 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hess Annuity

Jeff,

Deal QN2026.1 (EOL 803898) was booked on 01/24/2001 -  Enron Buys 15000/d
Feb. 01 at 6.90.  Deal QN2004.1 is a duplicate of this deal.  Deal QN5772.1
was booked on 01/25/2001 - Enron Sells 15000/d Feb. 01 at 7.115.  The booking
of QN5772.1 generated positive revenue of $90,300.  Annuity deal QN2026
paying Hess $45,143 was booked tonight.

Thanks,

Errol


The EES All-Employee Meeting scheduled for this Thursday, November 1, 2001 has been postponed and will be rescheduled for a later date.  Stay tuned for more information.


Robert,

Please find below the authorization for the studay, as we had spoken about
during our conference call earlier today.

AUTHORIZATION

I authorize Henwood Energy Services, Inc., to provide for the hourly rates
stated in the proposal dated 29 Dec. 2000, an Analysis of the India
Electricity System and an Evaluation of the Dabhol Plant Despatch.  The
results of the study and information provided by Enron shall be considered
confidential and will be subject to a confidentiality agreement to be
prepared by Enron and submitted to Henwood.

Sandeep Kohli,
Vice President,
Enron.


I got Jim Derrick's sign off on V & E on the patent for Kim and
Martha--bring the guy in  and get him acquainted with them and keep me
posted.  thanks. df


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001 05:47 PM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	03/23/2001 05:27 PM

		 To: SHERRI SORRELS <ssorrels_vitoltvl@yahoo.com>@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: TICKETED  27MAR HOUSTON TO LAX  -------- TICKETED AND UPGRADED

Please make sure my Cont. onepass account is credited and my Marriott rewards
account.

	SHERRI SORRELS <ssorrels_vitoltvl@yahoo.com>
	03/23/2001 05:15 PM

		 To: RICHARD.B.SANDERS@ENRON.COM
		 cc:
		 Subject: TICKETED  27MAR HOUSTON TO LAX  -------- TICKETED AND UPGRADED

                                          AGENT SS/SS BOOKING REF ZYR7VF

                                          SANDERS/RICHARD B

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  ATTN TWANDA SWEET X39402

  DATE:  MAR 23 2001                   ENRON

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  27MAR HOUSTON TX     LOS ANGELES CA 230P    406P
CO 1509    Y          TUE   G.BUSH INTERCO INTL
                            EQP: BOEING 737-800
                      *********SEAT 2B CONFIRMED********

HOTEL                 27MAR LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN MARRIOTT
                      28MAR 333 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
                            LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
                            TELEPHONE: (213) 617-1133
                            CONFIRMATION: 81101053
                            REFERENCE: REGB00
                            RATE: RAC USD 259.00 PER NIGHT
                            ADDITIONAL CHARGES MAY APPLY

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  28MAR LOS ANGELES CA HOUSTON TX     350P    905P
CO 1506    Y          WED   INTL           G.BUSH INTERCO
                            EQP: BOEING 737-800
                      ********SEAT 3E CONFIRMED*********

      AIR FARE 1637.20      TAX 131.30          TOTAL USD        1768.50
                                            AIR TOTAL USD        1768.50

                                        INVOICE TOTAL USD        1768.50

PAYMENT: CCAX378501018762006/0301/A000020

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/I07B51

SANDERS/RICHARD B                        TICKET:CO/ETKT 005 7026273460

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COTP028685
**********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Good Morning Jeff!
Contrary to popular belief, there are conversions that can be used, that will
reasonably convert the various units of measure.  I took a moment to compile
them into the attached spreadsheet.  Enjoy!

Jeff Dasovich on 05/11/2000 07:23:49 PM
To: James D Foster/DUB/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: SoCal CAD Accounts

Quick question:  Most folks think in terms of MMcf.  I know there isn't a
straighforward crossward from therms to MMcf, but do you folks have any rules
of thumb about BTU content I could use to translate the therm numbers you
sent into MMcf?  Thanks a lot.

Jeff


Gloria,

I need to have a redline generated by Comparwrite, as I don't have it loaded
locally.  The original document is in my Fuel Cell/Equipment contract file,
and has the same name as the one below, only it is dated October11 (I believe
rev 2).  The new document is the one below.  Please save the redline verision
in the same directory, and email the redlined document to me, Heather Kroll,
Scott Healy, and Stephen Plauche ASAP.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000 12:21
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           10/27/2000 12:03 PM

To: <hnock@fce.com>, <rlevine@fce.com>
cc: Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Fuel Cell Purchase Order

Per my voice mail, here is the latest draft of the purchase order (we are
preparing a redlined version which I will send you shortly).  We have not had
the opportunity to incorporate all the business terms which were discussed
and agreed to yesterday.  Also, we have not yet completed a full internal
review of the document.  However, so that we can hold our conference call
today, I am sending you the draft.  Please give me a call to arrange the
conference call.


Andrea,

It's fine with me. Few points:

1. As a courtesy to Maureen Raymond, please, discuss the timing with her.

2. Yana is not a member of the Analyst/Associate pool. THIS IS NOT A ROTATION.
     She was hired directly and   this means that we transfer her
     permanently to your unit.

Vince

Andrea V Reed
12/05/2000 01:14 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Yana Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Yana Kristal's Rotation

I spoke to Yana today and understand that you are supportive of Yana rotating
through our group, EIM Fundamental Analysis.  We are very pleased that Yana
will be joining us.  Her skill set will be particularly helpful as we build
the steel business.

I was hoping that Yana could begin working with us mid December.   Does a
start date in EIM of Dec. 18 work for you?  Please let me know.

Once again, thank you for your support.

Andrea


Phillip,

This message is to confirm our meeting with you on, Friday, October 26th
from 9:00 am - 12:00 am in Conference Room 14C2  3AC. Attendees from our
team will include Mery Brown and Laura de la Torre.

Please let me know if you have further questions at 713-345-6686.

Thank you.

Laura de la Torre
Accenture
Resources
Houston, Texas
Direct Dial  713.837.2133
Octel  83 / 72133

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


These are not all my files.  Some were Carol's, Mary picked up a Yosemite and
perhaps Mark handled one or two.

	Tana Jones
	10/16/2000 10:56 AM

		 To: Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Prepaid Contracts

Taffy,  these are all finance deals that Sara worked on.  Can you work with
her to get copies of the ISDA Masters for this guy in the Audit group.  Check
Lotus Notes to see if we have blue files, and if not, check w/Sara.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 10:55 AM -----

	Brad Lawson
	10/11/2000 04:38 PM

		 To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Prepaid Contracts

Tana,
Here is the listing as we discussed:
 Chase III
 Chase Mahonia III
 Chase IV
 Delta Rosevelt
 Truman
 Jethro
 Yosemite Bridge
 Yosemite I
 Yosemite II
 Yosemite III

If you have any questions, just give me a call.  I'm located at X53919 and
EB2465a.
Thanks.
Brad


FYI, Nora Brownell's response to press release that EnronOnline would be buying natural gas and power on Wednesday, in the aftermath of Tuesday's tragedy.  Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Nora Brownell [mailto:nora.brownell@ferc.fed.us]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:13 PM
To: Alvarez, Ray
Subject: Re: Enron Press Release

Thanks....we need to do whatever we can to bring stability.  I appreciate Enron's leadership.
>>> "Alvarez, Ray" <Ray.Alvarez@ENRON.com> 09/12/01 10:04AM >>>
Please see the attached.

Ray J. Alvarez
Vice President
Regulatory Affairs

>
>
>
>
>  <<Crisis Release letterhead.pdf>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com <mailto:enron.messaging.administration@enron.com> and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


You gotta get more current jokes.  That one's been floating around for quite
some
time now.  How's everything in SF?  Have you moved into your new office?

KR


Hello all!

Please note that the ClickAtHome Road Show is open in Mt. Hood and Rainier.
You can view what they have to offer (PCs, accessories, etc), and speak with
representatives from the ClickAtHome Program, AT&T @ Home, Dell, HP, etc. You
can also order your PC in Mt. Rainier.

If you have any questions, please stop by!

====================================

The ClickAtHome ordering will be taking place in MT. RAINIER from 1pm to 5pm.


This message was sent automatically by Microsoft Outlook to inform you that you have been designated as a delegate. You can now send messages on my behalf.

You have been given the following permissions on my folders:
	Calendar:   	Reviewer (can read items)
	Tasks:      	Editor (can read, create, and modify items)
	Inbox:      	Editor (can read, create, and modify items)
	Contacts:   	Editor (can read, create, and modify items)
	Notes:      	None
	Journal:    	None

To open folders for which you have permissions, point to Open on the File menu, and then click Other User's Folder. You must be running Microsoft Outlook to do this.


My copy shows long term comp on the exhibit under "Grant Award".  And yes,
the date will be revised.

Mark Schroeder@ECT
04/14/2000 03:31 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Frevert/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: new contract

The contract Mark gave me to review yesterday only covers monthly salary.  I
had expected there to be some discussion/reference to long-term comp plan.
Mark had mentioned that what he gave me did not deal with certain non-compete
payments owed to me in 2000, so I am not looking for that, but I did think he
had said that there was something in the doucment re:long-term, which I
cannot find.  Please advise if I am missing something.  I will withhold other
comments for now, except to note that the draft was dated 13 March, and had a
14 day period before expiry (now passed), and will assume that that is an
irrelevancy.  Look forward to hearing from one of you. mcs


-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert Nelson" <JRNELSON@LLGM.COM>@ENRON
Sent: Tue 10/16/2001 4:17 PM
To: Mellencamp, Lisa
Cc:
Subject: PX

Howard Weg is setting up a meeting next week to negotiate a resolution of PX's claim against Edison.  The claim is for something north of $900 million.  Edison indicated that, barring settlement, it would just pay the full amount to PX.  If refunds are ordered by FERC or if Edison otherwise successfully pursues claims against participants, it will just look to the participants to pay.  Edison is willing to particpate in discussions aimed at settling the FERC issues and possibly providing funding for the post-reorganization PX (although, if deals are cut with Edison and PG & E, is there anything for the PX to do?).  Enron is on the Edison subcommittee in the PX case.  Edison wants company representatives available for next week's meeting either on Tuesday or Wednesday.  Do we want to participate and, if so, who will either attend or be available on the telephone from Enron?

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me by return mail, e-mail or at (insert your telephone number).  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

J. Robert Nelson

725 Soth Figueroa St, Los Angeles, Ca. 90017-5436

==============================================================================

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================


(See attached file: g020402.pdf)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 - g020402.pdf


Hello.  I dont understnd your response?  Are you talking about the retreat?


Good luck.  If it's not too much trouble, an email summarizing the day's
festivities would be helpful. Parquet ever get in touch with you?


Start Date: 12/20/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122022.txt


i will try to get those names for you today.  if i don't do it today just
remind me and i will get it done asap.


Start Date: 2/17/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001021713.txt


Molly,

This is an update on Anshuman. Please, see below. It seems
that his transfer is not an issue for the time being.

We can put it on a back-burner till he gets here.

Vince

P.S. The relevant section.

I also spoke about Anshuman, and there was resistance to his leaing for such
a long time.  However, I have agreement from folks here to send him to
Houston for a shorter stint on DPC budget.  I will try to finalize that
before I leave.  I will call you in the evening to just chat.

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
09:45 AM ---------------------------

Sandeep Kohli@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/19/2001 04:32 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transition to Research Group - An Update

Vince,

Just wanted to let you know that I had a meeting with Wade Cline (COO, Enron
India), Neil McGregor (President, DPC), and Mohan Gurunath (CFO, DPC) today.
Though I had already spoken to all of them earlier about my joining your
group, today it became official, and all of them supported the move.  I
explained to them what we would be doing, and the results expected from the
Henwood study.

DPC would like to pay the costs for the study, and that was mentioned.  There
maybe some tax issues etc. that need to be cleared, and other related issues
that I would like to discuss with you, so I will leave them till I get to
Houston.

I also spoke about Anshuman, and there was resistance to his leaing for such
a long time.  However, I have agreement from folks here to send him to
Houston for a shorter stint on DPC budget.  I will try to finalize that
before I leave.  I will call you in the evening to just chat.

I am very thankful to you for giving the opportunity you have.  Things here
have deteriorated dramatically over the last few weeks.  Morale is quite down
due to many lay-offs.

I am really looking forward to returning to Houston, and the family!!

Regards,
Sandeep.


Just got an update on the project that won't go away.  Dennis has a meeting
lined up with DOE decisionmakers on the 25th.  He is going to pitch the
project as an approximately 100 mw power plant, to be owned by (read
"financed by") DOE, with the gas pipeline owned by Dennis and\or third
parties (read "Enron"?).  Dennis has run economics that show the DOE will get
a more than 10% cost savings on the project compared to current PNM rates,
even assuming a fairly high gas transport cost because of the smaller gas
load.  How did he do it?  Very easy:  they ran the power plant economics
using about a $2.00 gas cost instead of current, real world prices.   Dennis'
argument is going to be:  "I'll take the risk on building the pipeline and
the power plant at a capped cost, and then sell the power plant to you."
"You take the risk on gas cost:  if gas cost tracks the 18-24 month average,
you will realize your 10% cost savings, but if current fuel costs continue or
escalate, you lose."    Either way, your reliability improves and you kick
PNM in the shins."  Dennis and Tino apparently think they can sell DOE on
this.  By the way, their current story on Richardson is that he won't resign,
and won't be forced out by the administration because that would create even
more publicity.  You'll love this:  they think Richardson is even more likely
to sign off on the deal now because his chances of being nominated for VP or
cabinet are dead and he now has nothing to lose in DC.  They think his real
angle is now to bring home the bacon to New Mexico and then run for governor
out there!!  Apparently the rank and file out in the home state think he got
hosed and made a scapegoat unfairly.
 I've asked  Lorna Brennan to pull some historical San Juan prices together
to give to Tino to confirm whether his $2 price is wacky.  Other than that, I
just told Tino that we are potentially interested in the pipeline part of the
project if the risks and rewards make sense, and that EE&CC might be
interested in the design/build on all of it.  He said he'd get back to me
after the 25th meeting and tell me whether the project is undead.  DF


holly,
i will be on a business trip wednesday afternoon and thursday of this week.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	04/06/01 02:34 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Greenberg@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Swap Calendars as of 4/6/01

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


I apologize for the previous e-mail regarding the above.

The computer file is corrupt so I will send a hard copy.


The only valid "Buyback" ticket for Meter #: 1373 is Sitara Ticket #:
246408.  S. Ticket #: 156342 is an old ticket which was used to set up
Buyback
       ticket across Equistar's meters{1552,1384,1062,1553}. If  you recall
this process was done to enable Client Services to automate Equistar
       allocation/billing. The project took place around April 2000
production retroactive back to Jan. 1999.  The link to compute the buyback is
set up
       on S. ticket # 246408.

       Since Equistar has begun doing business via ENA, it was necessary to
establish a "Buyback Ticket " on ENA's Matrix.
       Thus, to answer your question, yes there should only be one "buyback
ticket" for meter #: 1373 on HPL  and ENA.

       ENA activity is kept whole and the swing is on HPL.

       I hope I have addressed all of your questions below however, I am
available for follow up discussion if needed.

       It  has been a pleasure working with you. I learned a lot about the
business while scheduling industrials and thanks for the opportunity.

Daren J Farmer
09/07/2000 08:32 AM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Equistar Buybacks

Robert,

There are three buy back tickets in Sitara for Equistar at mtr 1373.  Two for
HPL and one under ENA.  Shouldn't we have only one buyback for each company?
Also, how do you have the meter set up to allocate between the ENA contract
and HPL contract?

D


Actually, it belongs to Greg Johnston since it is Canadian.

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 02:31 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Product Type approval for 2 product types!! (CAN Gas Fin Opt Put
and Call)

I believe this is yours...
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/14/01 02:28 PM -----

	Chris Walker
	03/12/01 05:31 PM

		 To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT, Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT, Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Lon Draper/CAL/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert B
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Product Type approval for 2 product types!! (CAN Gas Fin Opt Put
and Call)

Your review and approval of the following 2 product types in the EOL
Datamanager is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for
approval at the bottom of this e-mail)

Trader:  Lon Draper

CAN Gas Fin Opt Put
CAN Gas Fin Opt Call

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


Steve:

You had asked us to check the following CERA numbers:

No new major power plants built in past 10 years
CA economy grew 29 % over past 5 years
Electricity consumption grew by 24 % in same period

Jennifer Thome looked into the numbers and has provided the following:

Most of the media and wire stories use the CERA numbers
According to Margaret Carson, there are two main problems with CERA's
numbers:  1) consumption includes the entire WSCC region; 2) economic growth
figures are in 1996 dollars
CEC and other CA state agency sites do not provide much updated information
and Margaret indicated that the state is reluctant to highlight its high
growth and consumption rates.
Margaret is finalizing a presentation for Rick that provides the following
figures for 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000:
CA Economic Growth:  5.6%, 6%, 4.5%, and 8.7% respectively
CA Electricity Demand: 3%, 0%, 4% and 9% respectively


Erica can be reached at 703-491-8005, or  2606 Woodfern Court, Woodbridge, VA
22192.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2000 03:33
PM ---------------------------

"Diza, Alain D" <dizaad@texaco.com> on 01/31/2000 03:18:20 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hey Chris..........

Hey Chris,

Sorry about the phone call -- kinda difficult being discreet around here --
you know!

Yes! I'd definitely like to meet anytime this week.  Lunchtime might be
kinda rough for

you and me both, eh?  So,....maybe dinner one or more nights this week??
I'm available

any evening this week.  Just let me know!

I also spoke with Marde @ EES.  She says that "Tom Hermanic" from her group
will

be calling me soon as well.  It appears that they could use a good
Northeast/CNG

scheduler in the Commodity Risk Management group ASAP.  I applied for the
position via

Marde and the Job# as is posted on the Enron company job site (online).
Just reading

over the qualifications and pre-reqs,.....I like the position and feel that
I could contribute

immediately.

 Let's keep in touch, Chris!  Thanks for calling me!

   Sincerely,......Alain


Platts Energy Bulletin

Platts welcomes Energy Insight readers to Platts Energy Bulletin. For Platts
Premium customers go to www.einsight.com (http://www.einsight.com) to pick up
your Platts Energy Insight subscription. Your password and login will remain the
same.

The daily Energy Bulletin is a showcase of the top headlines posted on
platts.com (http://www.platts.com) over the past 24 hours. To view this file in
html, open the attachment at the bottom of this email. We welcome your feedback
- send your comments to feedback@platts.com

Instructions for unsubscribing can be found at the bottom of each issue.

Jan 16, 2002

What's New on platts.com?
Platts Enron Report: Read about the implications of Enron's bankruptcy on the
financial and energy communities.
(http://www.platts.com/features/enron/index.shtml)

Saudi Arabia: Bin Laden's Challenge: For Osama bin Laden, the alleged
perpetrator of the terrorist assault on America Sep 11, the ultimate target was
not the United States but Saudi Arabia.
(http://www.platts.com/features/binladen/index.shtml)

Futures Round-up
IPE Brent Focus: IPE Brent crude falls on bearish API data
Front-month February futures, which expire later Wednesday, gapped lower in ETS
electronic trading, and traded at $19.04/bbl at 1046 GMT, 66 cts off Tuesday's
settlement. March had slipped by 51 cts at the same time to trade at $18.47/bbl.

News Round-up
Click on the headlines below or paste the URLs provided in your internet browser
to see the full story.

ADVERTISEMENT:
Platts Global Energy Jobs Board and Resume Bank: Created in partnership with the
Energy Jobs Network, the Jobs Board gives you access to a pool of job seekers
and open positions across the energy industry. It's free for all job seekers,
and there is a range of packages for employers posting jobs.
(http://www.energyjobsnetwork.com/home.asp?code=platts)

OIL:
World community readies Afghanistan as energy player
The international community is readying Afghanistan to be a player on the energy
scene, with attention these days focused on the energy potential of Central Asia
and the role of Afghanistan as a possible producer as well as a pipeline route
from the Caspian to oil and gas-hungry markets.
(http://www.platts.com/archives.shtml#57758)

NATURAL GAS:
Gazprom welcomes prospect of higher Russian gas prices
The CEO of Russian gas monopoly Gazprom Alexei Miller Tuesday welcomed the
prospect of higher domestic gas tariffs in 2002, saying that higher prices would
help the company meet its Rb140.8-bil ($4.69-bil) investment target this year.
(http://www.platts.com/archives.shtml#57779)

PETROCHEMICALS:
Qatar QAFAC confirms MTBE plant shutdown from Jan 14
The Qatar Fuel Additives Company has shut down its 610,000 mt/yr MTBE plant on
Monday as scheduled, a company source confirmed Wednesday.
(http://www.platts.com/archives.shtml#57769)

ADVERTISEMENT:
Platts Buyers' Guide: One online place for the electric power industry to
search, compare and find the products and services you need. Click to add your
listing. (http://www.mediabrains.com/client/platts/bg1/search.asp)

ELECTRIC POWER:
South Korea to begin power sector privatization in H1 2002
South Korea's Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy said in a statement
Wednesday it plans to start privatization of the Korea Electric Power Corp in
the first half of year 2002. (http://www.platts.com/archives.shtml#57763)

NUCLEAR:
Germany earmarks extra $25-mil for Chernobyl nuke
The German government is to donate a further $25-mil towards safety provisions
at Ukraine's Chernobyl nuclear power station, the environment ministry said
Wednesday. (http://www.platts.com/archives.shtml#57780)

COAL:
PG&E considers Salem Harbor sale
US' PG&E National Energy Group is taking offers of interest on about 1,830 MW of
generation, including the company?s four-unit, coal-fired 750-MW Salem Harbor
station. (http://www.platts.com/archives.shtml#57740)

Want more information on Platts products? Browse the Platts Infostore at
http://www.platts.com/mhe_infostore/cgi-bin/infostore.

You can also email Platts sales team at info@platts.com or check for the details
of your nearest sales representative in our list of Platts offices at
http://www.platts.com/about/offices.shtml.

For information on how to advertise on the Platts Energy Bulletin or on
platts.com contact josie_parnell@platts.com.

To email an editor, click on
http://www.platts.com/oil/editorialquestions.shtml?EnergyBulletin

To unsubscribe from the Energy Bulletin, please send an email to
listserv@listserv.resdata.com and type the words UNSUBSCRIBE PLATTS in the body
of your message. You should receive a response telling you that you have been
unsubscribed. If you are experiencing problems, email us at feedback@platts.com.

 - 011602.html


Rahil:

Attached is an electronic version of the final FT Energy Agreement.  As we
discussed, I will send down two hard-copies initialed by me and ready for
execution.  I'll leave it to you to send out the executed agreements (with
the Exhibits) to FT Energy.  Instruct them to execute both copies and return
one originally executed copy to you.  When you have a final executed
agreement , please send me a COPY.

Thanks,

Leslie

	Rahil Jafry
	12/04/2000 09:34 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Lorie
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Contract with revisions

Leslie,

Please give me a call when you read through the revised version of the
document we sent them.  Ideally, we should be able to get all the issues
ironed out today and send on a signed copy to them by tomorrow AM, if
possible.

Thanks in advance,
Rahil
3-3206
---------------------- Forwarded by Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 09:25
AM ---------------------------

"Behrman, David" <DBehrman@ftenergy.com> on 12/04/2000 09:07:11 AM
To: "'Rahil.Jafry@enron.com'" <Rahil.Jafry@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Contract with revisions

Rahil,

Attached is a revised copy of the contract you sent. As you'll see, the
changes are relatively minor. If the contract is OK with you as is, print
and sign it, and send us a copy and we'll move on this for the gas indexes.
I would suggest a start date of Monday Dec. 13 and an extension of the
termination to Feb. 15, 2001. If you have questions, give me a call.

Any progress on the power side?

 <<ElecIndexContractEnron2.doc>>
I

David M. Behrman
Senior Managing Editor, Price Surveys
Financial Times Energy, Houston
Gas Daily & Megawatt Daily
713-939-5845

 - ElecIndexContractEnron2.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001
08:10 AM ---------------------------

"Henk, Robert" <RHenk@barbnet.com> on 02/21/2001 03:55:21 PM
To: "'susan.w.pereira@enron.com'" <susan.w.pereira@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: March Gas

Susan, have you started buying March gas on Tenn (0)?


ISO Market Participants:

The Agenda for the Market Issues Forum Meeting scheduled for this Thursday,
November 15, 2001, is now posted on the CAISO website:
http://www.caiso.com/meetings/

If you plan on attending the meeting and need to RSVP, please email Julia
Payton at jpayton@caiso.com, or call her directly at (916) 608-7069.

Client Relations Communications.1120
CRCommunications@caiso.com


Attached is a clean version of the LOI.  I only revised what was paragraph 6.  I tried to redline, but it picked up all the previous changes.


ruggles it is.  let's meet there b/t 6-6:30.  i will definately be there at
6.  i'm not FOOLIN.  i want to party like an ANIMAL.    it is gonna be
HYSTERIA tonight.  enought of the bad jokes.


Dear Schuyler:

It seems to me that you used to chair a seminar put on by the Euromoney
people on swap documentation.  We used to send our new lawyers and more
experienced paralegals to the introductory course and the more
experienced lawyers to the advanced course.  It appears that Euromoney
is no longer putting this on.  Are you doing something similar through
another provider?

Mark Taylor


Please note, if there is anyone not included on this list that you feel that
could benefit from this meeting, please extend the invitation and be sure to
let me know the attendees names!  Thanks!

Kim Weldon
08/01/2000 10:36 AM
To: Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danny Conner/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Trisha Hughes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Jo
Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G
Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Xochitl-Alexis Velasco/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Mtg. Request - Discuss King Ranch System

Please plan to attend a lunch meeting to discuss the King Ranch System this
Thursday, August 3rd.

                   Thursday - August 3rd
              Conf. Room - EB 21C2
  11:30 AM - 1:00 PM
            (Lunch will be provided)

Please confirm with me by Wednesday, mid-morning so I get an accurate head
count for ordering lunch.

Thanks so much!

Kim Weldon
x 33221


Hi, Here is where I'll be:

Oct  3 -        SW flight #76 to San Jose
            Mill Rose Inn, Half Moon Bay, 650-726-8750

Oct  4 -        Petersen, Los Gatos, 408-354-1691
       6

Oct  7 -        Santa Cruz Hotel, Santa Cruz, 831-426-4330
       8

Oct  9 -    Quality Inn, Cannery Row, 831-649-8580

Oct 10 -    Coachman's Inn, Carmel, 831-624-6421
      11

Oct 12 -    Big Sur Lodge, Big Sur, 831-667-3100
      13

Oct 14 -    Sea Otter Inn, Cambria, 805-927-5888
      15

Oct 16 -    Petersen's
       17

Oct 18 -    SW Flight #1211

See you when I get back!    love, mum


Sara,

I had mentioned that I thought West LB was missing a few trades, but everything now appears to be o.k.  I double checked the spreadsheet they sent, and the extra trades we have actually cancel one another out.

What we now need from West LB is their settlement amount and valuation methodology.

Thanks!


See attached pleading we are drafting.  The PX is seeking permission from the
Bankruptcy Court to lift the stay to allow parties to continue this FERC case.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001 02:13 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Karen Bishop" <kbishop@bracepatt.com>
03/12/2001 01:02 PM

To: <dvermillion@avistaenergy.com>, <phillip_fantle@cargill.com>,
<rreilley@coral-energy.com>, <mhain@ect.enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<snovose@enron.com>, <kzeitlin@mofo.com>, <rloeffler@mofo.com>,
<jmcgrane@morganlewis.com>, <mgriffen@morganlewis.com>, <bcurrey@omm.com>,
<jstamper@omm.com>, <John.fryer@pacificorp.com>,
<Timothy.Bolden@pinnaclewest.com>, <dmperlman@powersrc.com>,
<rosteen@powersrc.com>, <dgarber@sempra.com>, <rbeitler@sempratrading.com>,
<paramfjord@stoel.com>, <rcjosephson@stoel.com>, <sjkaplan@stoel.com>,
<ayudkowsky@stroock.com>, <mbrosterman@stroock.com>, <cfr@vnf.com>,
<gdb@vnf.com>, <hes@vnf.com>, <jrr@vnf.com>
cc: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll"
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: CalPX Compalinants' Motion and Redlined

Please find attached the Word versions of the above referenced documents.
Please let us know if you have any questions.

 - #139337 v1 - CALPX COPLAINANTS' MOTION.doc
 - #139338 v1 - CALPX COMPLAINANTS' MOTION REDLINED.doc


Test

Vince Kaminski


Based upon discussions with Andrea Reed, the res of the swap will be the
warrant itself, not the underlying stock.  The warrants are valued separately
with a "warrant model" and carry a price of their own differentiated from,
although affected by, the stock price.  I did not get into further detail on
the specifics of the modeling.  The will provide us the number of warrants,
the strike price as of August 3.  Otherwise they will work similarly to the
stock based swap I think.  She said they do not plan to exercise them, but
may sell them as warrants.  Let me know what you think.  Mary


Devon Energy and Santa Fe Snyder completed their $2.5 billion merger
yesterday as shareholders of both companies approved the deal, which was
announced in May. The agreement called for each Santa Fe Snyder common share
to be converted into 0.22 shares of Devon common stock. Conversion requires
issuance of 40.6 million additional Devon common shares, resulting in total
shares outstanding of 127.7 million. Former Santa Fe Snyder shareholders now
own 32% of the combined company. Historical Devon shareholders own 68% of the
combined company. The transaction will be accounted for as a pooling of
interests. With merger completion, Devon now ranks among the top five
U.S.-based independent oil and gas producers in terms of market
capitalization, total proved reserves and annual production. The company has
an enterprise value of $9 billion and proved reserves of 1.1 billion boe. The
company expects to realize $30 million to $35 million in annual cost savings
from the merger. Devon was added to the S&P 500 Index after the close of
business yesterday.


thx  and have fun on vaca

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: End of the YEar

Hey:
Sorry I didn't get to come by before I left. I have been in London since
12/15.I hope the expiry goes smoothly for you. Also I hope your holliday
season is going well ( however abridged it is by the NYMEX and Enron)
 Many of the guys over here asked about nat gas and EOL in the US. I
suggested they visit with you when they are over in the US. In particular,
Chris Mahoney (gasoil trader) will be in Houston the 27 t0 30. I told him he
should come and watch you deal with the AGA number and NX1 at the same time.
Chris is a really good guy. His team loves him and will definitely play a
large role in turning the crude and products group around.

 Anyway you were a great pal over the last 12 months and gave me a lot of
good advice. I do miss listening to the banter on the gas floor (and the
gambling!), but there are a lot of good people in crude and products
(especially in London) and I think we will be able to deliver on the goods. I
think you are wonderful and I'm very happy we had the chance to work together.

Happy New Year!
Jen

PS I am coming back on the 6th. Once I finish up the week, I am off to Berlin
for New Year's Eve and then a little trip over to Prague.

PPS If there is any other info you need let me know. By Jan 15, I should have
about 15 analysts and be able to devote some to special projects.

PPS       A London HOuston Comparison
    London     HOUSTON
Employee Referral  BMW Z3     Maybe 2K, usually a slap on the back
Parking Avail   10 spots     100's
Parking Fee   Monthly auction, with 10 top ten bids  Set annual, space yours
for your ENE life
    winning, lowest of the ten setting
    monthly price
Building   Across from Buckingham Palace  Demilitarized zone
Holiday   5 weeks      ????
Trading Day   8 am - 8:30 pm    6-6:30
Closest Bar   British Pub, one Block   Ninfa's Allen Ctr

John Arnold
26/12/2000 19:03
To: Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NG Expiry

sorry didnt respond to your message.   don't know how to do that instant
messenger thing anymore.  volume very, very light.  most of stated volume in
spreads and TAS.  No one seems to want to be in the office this week.
Everyone wants to get this year over with.
Keep pumping in the fundamental info.   very good stuff and i'm not getting
it anywhere else.

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           12/26/2000 12:16 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NG Expiry

Hey


I received confirmation:  The Soft cap at $250.00, was effective on 12/08/00
and the soft cap at $150.00 was effective on 01/01/01.  Sorry for the
confusion, but there are so many changes going on its hard to keep up.  Here
is another market notice with further clarification on allocation:

-----Original Message-----
From:	CRCommunications
Sent:	Wednesday, January 31, 2001 4:38 PM
To:	SC Settlements Contacts
Cc:	ISO Market Participants
Subject:	CAISO Notification -  New Charge Types - Soft Cap

Effective trade day December 12, 2000, pursuant to Amendment 33, the ISO
will allocate the amount paid to purchase Energy above the soft price cap
and for energy procured out-of-market to those Scheduling Coordinators who
underschedule load or overschedule generation.  The ISO has developed the
following two new Charge Types for these Settlements.

CT 481 - Soft Cap Payment to SCs
The ISO will compensate Instructed Energy providers for energy instructed at
a price above the MCP in two parts.  The amount of instructed energy
delivered will be compensated in Charge Type 401 at the interval MCP.  The
difference between the interval MCP and the bid in price above the soft cap
will be compensated in Charge Type 481.

CT 487 - Soft Cap Cost Allocation to Market
The total payments made by ISO in charge type 481 will be allocated on a
regional basis to SCs based on their net negative Uninstructed Energy in the
corresponding region through Charge Type 487.  Units providing Regulation
are exempted from the charge type 487.

The supporting details for charge type 481 and 487 will be provided in the
Instructed/Uninstructed Energy Detail Records in the Imbalance Energy/No Pay
Settlement Detail File.  The Uninstructed energy file contains a new section
called Excess Cost section.  These statement file changes are reflected in
version 12.2a of the Settlement Statement File Specification which was
distributed to TSWG and SC Settlements Contacts January 30, 2001.

Keoni Almeida
California Independent System Operator
phone: 916/608-7053
pager:  916/814-7352
alpha page:  9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net
e-mail:  <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com>


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
06:10 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
09/01/2000 04:35 PM
To: vkaminski@aol.com
cc:
Subject: PApers


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041905.txt


Subject: Terrorizing the terrorists

Here's what we got going for us.  To be reckoned with.  And this is only
what we know.  You can be certain there is stuff that we don't know about
and don't need to.  While you're reading this some of your fellow Americans
are hard at work getting down and dirty and most of all being very nasty.
Just like in the movies, but we won't get to see this take place.  Just know
it is.

GO SPECIAL FORCES!!!

Special warriors' role: to terrorize terrorists

By STEPHEN HARRIMAN, The Norfolk Virginian-Pilot ? September 29, 2001

This week, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld told Americans and others
on a war watch not to expect a ``D-Day.'' In others words, don't look for
aircraft, ships and cruise missiles to suddenly light up the sky over
Afghanistan like they did in Baghdad in the first hours of the Gulf War.

Expect instead, the administration has been saying, a much more targeted
campaign aimed at ``smoking out'' individuals and cells of terrorists from
their mountainous hideouts.

Those who specialize in that sort of covert operation are the unconventional
warriors of the U.S. Special Operations Command. They are likely to play a
big role in this first war of the 21st century. Their mission will be to
terrorize the terrorists.

What follows is a profile of special operation forces -- units from the
Navy, Army and Air Force with a combined troop strength of between 45,000
and 50,000. The information was gleaned from publicly available material
including official Web sites.

The Army's 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (Delta Force),
headquartered in a remote section of sprawling Fort Bragg, N.C., is, like
the Naval Special Warfare Development Group (Dev Group), one of the U.S.
government's principal units charged with worldwide counter-terrorist
operations.

Both select experienced men from other special operation forces. There are
no women in special forces. Their methods of operation, too, are similar:
small groups, in and out quickly, often under the cover of darkness,
striking with speed, surprise and extreme violence.

Delta Force was created by Army Col. Charles Beckwith in 1977 in response to
numerous, well-publicized terrorist incidents in the 1970s. It is organized
into three operating squadrons, all of which are subdivided into small
groups known as troops, which can each be further divided into smaller units
as needed to fit mission requirements.

Delta also maintains support units which handle selection and training,
logistics, finance, and the units' medical requirements. Within this
grouping is a little-known but vital technical unit responsible for covert
eavesdropping and intelligence gathering.

Delta troopers are also equipped with the most advanced weaponry and
equipment available. A significant portion of their gear is highly
customized and cannot be found anywhere but in Deltas' lockers.

The Navy's Dev Group, based at the Navy facility at Dam Neck in Virginia
Beach, is an evolution of Seal Team 6, the existence of which the Navy has
never confirmed. Organization and manpower of the group is classified.
However, it is estimated that it now numbers approximately 200 operators.
There is also an administrative and testing section, which numbers
approximately 300 personnel.

It has been rumored that the unit maintains or has maintained a small number
of Black Hawk helicopters, but the majority of aviation requirements are
provided by the Army's 160th Special Operation Aviation Regiment, especially
in support of ship assaults, which frequently make use of the small MH-6
``Little Bird'' helicopters operated exclusively by the 160th.

The group is reportedly divided into five teams: Gold, Blue and Red for
assault, Gray for transportation and Black for reconnaissance and
surveillance; a sixth, the Green team, is for new personnel in training.

The Navy also brings to the table six Seal Teams with special covert
capabilities on sea, air and land. Teams 1, 3 and 5 are based at San Diego,
Teams 2, 4 and 8 at Little Creek Naval Amphibious Base. Each team has a
headquarters element and eight platoons (except for Seal Team 4, which has
10) of about a dozen men each, depending on the mission.

The Army's 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Airborne) provides
aviation support to special operation forces. The Regiment consists of
modified Little Bird light observation helicopters, Black Hawk helicopters,
and Chinook medium-lift helicopters.

The regiment is trained to work in conjunction with other special operation
forces, especially to insert, extract and resupply them, and to conduct
armed escort, reconnaissance, surveillance, and electronic warfare in
support of their missions. Its focus on night operations resulted in the
nickname ``The Night Stalkers.''

Three battalions are based at Fort Campbell, Ky., home of the 101st Airborne
Division (Air Assault), and a fourth at Hunter Army Airfield in Georgia. The
75th Ranger Regiment is the largest ground component of the special
operation forces. It is the premier airfield seizure and raid unit in the
Army. One of its first targets could be the large former Soviet base at
Bagram. The base, Afghanistan's only all-weather airfield, would make an
ideal forward operations base for special forces. The regiment is made up of
three 580-member Ranger battalions, based at Hunter Army Airfield, Fort
Lewis, Wash., and Fort Benning, Ga.

Each of the battalions has three 152-member rifle companies and a
headquarters element. Their capabilities include: infiltrating and getting
back out by land, sea, and air; conducting raids; recovery of personnel and
equipment, and conducting conventional or special light-infantry operations.

Ranger units have a limited anti-armor capability. Their only air defense
artillery system is the shoulder-fired Stinger missile. Ranger units
generally deploy with five days of supplies. The Army's Special Forces
soldiers (Green Berets) are carefully selected, specially trained, and
capable of extended operations in extremely remote and hostile territory.

``Foreign internal defense'' operations are designed to help friendly
developing nations by working with their military and paramilitary forces.
The Green Berets are likely to work with the various disaffected indigenous
people of the region to establish reliable intelligence.

The Special Forces Command is divided into five groups. The 5th Special
Forces Group (Airborne), based at Fort Campbell, focuses on Southwest Asia
and Northeastern Africa.

A Special Forces group has a headquarters element, a support element and
three battalions. Each battalion consists of 39 officers, 24 warrant
officers and 320 enlisted soldiers. A Special Forces company consists of
eight officers, seven warrant officers and 67 enlisted soldiers. Green
Berets are most frequently deployed in even smaller units called A
Detachments or teams of a dozen men. The Air Force 16th Special Operations
Wing is that service's major component in the U.S. Special Operations
Command, with a fleet of more than 90 aircraft, mostly MC-130s, that work
closely with Army and Navy forces in the support of unconventional warfare
missions.

Modifications to the MC-130 allow aircrews to perform clandestine missions
minimizing the chances of being detected by hostile radar systems.

The 352nd Special Operations Group, based in England, works with special
operation activities throughout the U.S. European Command and U.S. Central
Command. Other ground units that are trained to conduct similar covert
missions include Army Long Range Surveillance Units (LRSUs), the 10th
Mountain Division based at Fort Drum, N.Y., the 82nd Airborne Division based
at Fort Bragg, and the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) based at Fort
Campbell.

LRSUs are specially trained and equipped to collect human intelligence. They
observe and report enemy dispositions, movements and activities, and
battlefield conditions avoiding contact with the enemy and local civilians.

The 10th, 82nd and 101st divisions are large units that would be deployed
only if an extended ground war developed. All are light divisions and are
supposed to be deployed quickly; it took 60 days to deploy the 101st and all
its helicopters during the buildup to the allied strikes against Iraqi
forces in the Gulf War.

The Marines also have special training in special operations. Each deployed
Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) -- a reinforced battalion, a composite
aircraft squadron and a service support group with about 2,200 personnel --
is certified capable of special operations.

Each MEU contains a sub-unit whose tasks include deep reconnaissance and
surveillance, hostage rescue, and demolition.


Howdy all! SUE NELSON at AURORA GAS COMPANY (based in Michigan) is asking for
information pertaining to what actions are necessary to establish a MASTER
PURCHASE CONTRACT with ENA.

What she is looking for: They are a small Utility that is looking for a FIRM
PURCHASE contract taking gas to "Mich Gas Station" (?). They are looking at
approximately 300,000 MMBTu a year and are looking for a 2 - 3 year contract.

Sue Nelson can be reached at 517-733-6625.

We have not yet done business with this counterparty, so they are not in any
of our Global systems.
(Their address is (per smartpages.com) 7038 S Black River Rd, Onaway, MI
49765. (She left her fax number instead of a phone, by the way - - - - -
their fax is 571.733.6626)

Please let me know if I can do anything else to help.

Thanks!!
Cyndie


Huh?

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/07/2001 10:29 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Docs

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


Rakesh,

I have informed Ryan Siurek (cc Rick Buy) on Oct 4
that I cannot sign off on any analysis
done by our group without looking at full set of
legal documents related to the LJM
transactions. Those documents were not provided and therefore
we cannot sign off on any analysis done in the past.

I have come to a conclusion that we cannot support
the valuations based on verbal and
often conflicting information, without doing  full due
diligence.

Feel free to provide the information to Kimberly but,
please, inform her I cannot support the quantitative analysis
we have done in the past. I am especially concerned about the conflict between
the existence of the restriction and the existence of a put that are, in my view,
mutually exclusive.

Vince

-----Original Message-----
From: Bharati, Rakesh
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J; Shanbhogue, Vasant
Subject: FW: Note on Valuation
Importance: High

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: kimberly.r.scardino@us.andersen.com
[mailto:kimberly.r.scardino@us.andersen.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Bharati, Rakesh; Siurek, Ryan
Subject: Re: Note on Valuation
Importance: High

This is the latest version of your Raptor valuation memo that we have.  Is
there a more recent version with the changes we discussed (i.e. UBS shares
are not in a forward contract, 4 year restriction, etc.)?

To:   Kimberly R. Scardino@ANDERSEN WO
cc:
Date: 09/26/2001 10:43 AM
From: Rakesh.Bharati@enron.com
Subject:  Note on Valuation

Kimberly,

Here is the note.  Do let me know if I can assist further.

 <<Note to AA09242001.doc>>

Rakesh Bharati
Phone: (713) 853-0936
Fax:     (713) 646-2503

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
(See attached file: Note to AA09242001.doc)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


FYI.  From today's Post.  Davis seems to continue to put distance between
himself and the contracts.

Best,
Jeff
**********************************************************************
Financial
California Changes Stance on Refunds; Two Sides Far Apart In Energy Talks
Peter Behr
?
07/06/2001
The Washington Post
FINAL
Page E01
Copyright 2001, The Washington Post Co. All Rights Reserved
California officials have abruptly shifted tactics in their attempt to
recover billions of dollars in alleged overcharges for electricity , saying
they may reduce their demands for huge refunds if generators renegotiate $43
billion in long-term electricity contracts that the state signed this year.
Gov. Gray Davis (D) said part of the $8.9 billion in refunds the state is
seeking could be offset by reductions in energy prices in the long-term
contracts, whose costs have become a growing political embarrassment for
Davis.
"We've made suggestions, we've offered various ways in which people could get
us $8.9 billion," Davis told the San Jose Mercury News in a report yesterday.
"You can renegotiate our existing contracts and save us money. However you
want to do it, it's just got to net out close to $8.9 billion."
The new offer was introduced this week into the closed negotiations over a
California settlement being conducted in Washington by Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Judge Curtis L. Wagner Jr., according to sources close
to the negotiations.
Yesterday, Wagner said he may issue his own preliminary finding today on the
amount of overcharges if California officials and the generators cannot reach
a compromise.
"What I'm trying to do is get people in a settlement mood," Wagner told
reporters. "In the event we're unable to do that, [Friday] at some point I
may offer a preliminary assessment." The settlement conference is set to
conclude on Monday.
Wagner, FERC's chief administrative judge, has been trying to push both sides
toward a compromise that would resolve the huge energy pricing controversy.
Mountainous energy prices have bankrupted California 's largest utility,
drained billions of dollars out of the state treasury and put Davis at
sword's point with generators that help keep the state's lights on.
Last Friday, Wagner rebuked Davis's chief representative, Michael Kahn,
chairman of California Independent Grid Operator -- the state's power grid
manager -- indicating that the state's demand for nearly $9 billion in
refunds from power generators and marketers was too high, sources said.
Wagner's settlement conference, which has involved more than 100 lawyers for
all sides, is closed to the public and media.
Wagner complained last month that Kahn was following a political agenda, and
his lack of independence in the negotiations was such a "joke" that the
parties might as well wear "clown suits," according to a Dow Jones report
confirmed by sources close to the talks.
But he has also criticized the generators and power marketers, led by Reliant
Energy Inc., Williams Energy Services, Duke Energy and Southern Co., for
failing to make serious settlement offers, these sources said. The suppliers
have offered to refund $600 million, provided the state is able to call off
various California lawsuits demanding far larger refunds, sources said.
Wagner's leverage is his ability to propose his own refund figure to FERC's
commissioners. FERC has tentatively called for $124 million in refunds, but
now is taking a harder line on preventing a new escalation of California 's
electricity prices this summer and is likely to be receptive to a higher
refund figure, some energy analysts believe.
Davis's tactical change, offering to make the long-term contracts part of an
overall settlement, comes amid growing criticism of what the state will have
to pay for energy under those deals.
California 's energy calamity stemmed in large part from its failed
deregulation plan, which relied heavily on short-term power purchases at
volatile "spot market" prices. When energy costs shot upward last summer, so
did the state's electricity bills.
In response, Davis's aide, S. David Freeman, and his staff began negotiating
long-term power contacts with suppliers. The $43 billion in deals signed so
far would require the state to pay about $70 per hour for a megawatt of power
for a large part of the electricity it will need over the next 10 years.
That's well under the average of $250 per megawatt-hour that the state was
paying at the beginning of this year, but above current power prices -- and
considerably higher than what electricity may cost in the next decade, energy
analysts say.
A new agreement to lower those contract prices could relieve political
pressure on Davis and focus settlement negotiations away from the state's
controversial demand for the $8.9 billion refund. Davis will argue that
reducing future power charges that his administration negotiated should count
as a "refund" because the deals were reached "under commercial duress,"
according to sources close to Wagner's negotiations.
Industry supporters say Davis's refund figure is impossible to justify.
"There's no benchmark for what a fair and reasonable price should be," said
Michael Zenger, California director of Cambridge Energy Research Associates.
The state's advocates counter that if FERC enforced a "just and reasonable"
standard for power prices based on operating costs and a generous profit, the
overcharges by all sellers could easily reach the $9 billion figure.
"It's not rocket science, but it does require the regulators to regulate,"
said Frank Wolak, a Stanford University economist who heads an oversight
committee for the California grid.
Those polar-opposite views have left both sides in Wagner's conference room
"billions of dollars apart," as the talks approached their final weekend,
sources said.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/15/2001 03:44
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert Sevitz                           02/13/2001 05:11 PM

To: Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Randy Pais/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Co-op City - Term Sheet

Scott

Term sheet for draft contract, as requested.


Dear Vince:

It was great talking to you on Friday. Thank you very
much for the opportunity and your time.

After having talked with you and other people in the
group, I was very impressed by Enron research group's
deep insights, high professionalism, and the friendly
attitude. I really wish that I could have the
opportunity to join the group and contribute to the
future success of the research group with my solid
background in finance and econometrics.

If you have any questions, please feel free to let me
know. I look forward to hearing from you soon, thank
you very much.

sincerely,
Charles

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf!  It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/


We look forward to seeing everyone!  Dig up your scrap change and join us!

Lara and Janel

Lara Leibman
lleibman@houston.rr.com <mailto:lleibman@houston.rr.com>
713-851-7770 (cell)
713-528-5281 (home

Janel Guerrero
travelgirl_janel@hotmail.com <mailto:travelgirl_janel@hotmail.com>
713-851-3778 (cell)
713-524-1534 (home)


Margaret Carson
	01/04/2001 11:30 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Here is a timely report for distribution to the GA group

Fyi    It is   easier  to  read after detaching  and click on  the PDF
version.  M Carson


I just tried out the new computer down in Jean's office and it works great -
much faster, and things print from FERC and Lexis without kicking you out of
the computer afterwards or screwing up the print fonts.

	From:  Dari Dornan                           12/06/2000 01:03 PM

To: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann
Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Lexis Nexis/Legal and Windows 2000

i use Lexis but not Lexis Nexis.  Dari

MARTHA
BENNER
12/06/2000 07:36 AM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Lexis Nexis/Legal and Windows 2000

Who uses this application in our department?   Others?

Thanks.....Martha
---------------------- Forwarded by Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron on 12/06/2000
07:32 AM ---------------------------
From: Jean Mcfarland/ENRON@enronxgate on 12/05/2000 04:43 PM
To: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Lexis Nexis/Legal and Windows 2000

Martha -- do you use Lexis Nexis?  Can you come down into my area and test
Lexis Nexis and other apps Legal may use?

Thanks.  Jean


It will be mapped to PG&E Topock Index and the PG&E Large Pkgs Gas Daily.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lozano, Melba
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Wolfe, Jason
Cc:	Jones, Monte; Sweitzer, Tara; Clause, Kristen; Walker, Chris; Bike, Anne; Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	RE: Kern Las Vegas
Importance:	High

Please verify that this is the one....

 << OLE Object: Paintbrush Picture >>
 << OLE Object: Paintbrush Picture >>

also,

One more thing...

What is the curve?  if you would be booking it manually, what would you put under Nymex Ref? (pub code)...

Let me know...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wolfe, Jason
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 1:42 PM
To:	Lozano, Melba
Cc:	Jones, Monte; Sweitzer, Tara; Clause, Kristen; Walker, Chris; Bike, Anne; Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	Kern Las Vegas
Importance:	High

Information for new physical point

US Gas Phy	Kern Las Vegas		Dec01		USD/MM

Pipe: Kern River Gas Transmission
Trade Zone: Las Vegas
Facility: UNA - Las Vegas

Meters will be determined during scheduling; it should bridge with unassigned meter.
EOL products required are Next Day physical, Next Day + 1 phys, BOM phys, BOM +1 phys,
and Prompt phys.

Trader: Mike Grigsby
Risk Book: ENA - IM WC CAL
Book Admin: Monte Jones

Thanks,

Jason Wolfe
x30568


587415 - changed to Bloomberg

All the rest of these were just entered, except last deal

Tom buys AEP
May
PV
283.00

Tom does not recognize this trade - is APB sure of the terms?

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
04/20/2001 01:27 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

587415
not apb

missing deals

mark f
buy srp
217.00
25 mw
pv
on peak

holden
sell williams
24-30
102.00
25 mw
pv
off peak

holden
sell williams
24-30
100.00
50 mw
pv
off peak

tom a
buy pacificorp
200.00
23rd
25 mw
on peak

tom a
buy aep
283.00
25 mw
may
pv
on peak


Where do we stand on this?
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 11:40 AM -----

	Rudwell Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/30/2001 05:26 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FW: Master Agreement - enovate LLC - Constellation Power (Revised
Dra ft)

Hi Debra!

As per our conversation, attached is Constellation Power's comments to the
Master Firm agreement they received from
Roy Rodriguez.  I will be happy if you can review this.  Additionally, as
soon as I come to some agreement with their credit group regarding threshold
and MACs, I will draft a credit worksheet and forward same to you.

Thanks
Rudwell.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "McGilloway, Vangie" <Vangie.McGilloway@constellation.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22McGilloway+2C+20Vangie+22+20+3CVangie+2EMcGilloway+40con
stellation+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May  30, 2001 11:01 AM
To: Johnson, Rudwell
Subject: Master Agreement - enovate LLC - Constellation Power (Revised Dra ft)

Rudwell- Pursuant to our discussion, attached please find a revised draft of
the Enfolio Agreement between CPS and enovate LLC.  The form of agreement is
the original one used by Enron and edited accordingly for enovate LLC.

The edits proposed (as submitted to enovate back in January) are consistent
with industry standards and according to my notes were being forwarded to
enovate's Legal (Enron) for further review.   We are continuing contact and
discussions to this matter with Roy Rodriguez at enovate and hope we can put
closure to this agreement in the very near future.

Regards,
Vangie McGillloway
Constellation Power Source, Inc.
Phone 410-468-3798
Fax 410-468-3499
Email vangie.mcgilloway@powersrc.com

 <<enovate -Master Firm Purchase Sale Agreement(rev 1-jan 15).doc>>

 - enovate -Master Firm Purchase Sale Agreement(rev 1-jan 15).doc


Ben,

Here is the updated contact list. Please forward any comments to me so I can
revise.

Thanks,
James

                James J. Heckler
  Global Energy & Project Finance
  V:(212) 325-5809
  F: (212) 325-8323
  CREDIT | FIRST
  SUISSE | BOSTON

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.