The DC Circuit Court of Appeals has extended the date for states and sources
to comply with the EPA's NOx SIP Call regulation to May 2004, from the
original May 2003 date.

Background

Back in May 1999, a federal Court stayed the NOx SIP submittal deadline for
States, pending the final outcome of the NOx SIP litigation.   After the DC
Circuit Court decided the case in March 2000, EPA asked the court to lift the
stay on the NOx SIP submittal for States and give the states the same amount
of time they would have had to submit their SIPs, had the stay not been
imposed in the first place.   Industry sources opposed lifting the stay, and
also asked the court to move the complaince deadline back a year, due to the
delays caused by the litigation.

The Court lifted the stay on June 22, 2000, but was silent on the issue of
the compliance deadline.  States are now required to develop their "State
Implementation Plans" (SIPs) by October 31, 2000.

Yesterday, the Court decided that sources should have until May 2004 to
comply, giving sources an extra year to prepare for the new regulatory regime.

Remaining Questions

With the previous 2003 compliance deadline, the NOx SIP Call regulations were
on the same time schedule as the Section 126 petitions, which were approved
by EPA (though a separate regulatory process -- a nearly-identical fallback
to the NOx SIP call) for many of the same sources and states as the NOx SIP
Call.   The Section 126 Rule is going to be litigated starting this coming
November, but the Court has not yet issued a stay of those regulation, nor
has it delayed the compliance deadline to 2003.   Unless the Court places a
stay on the 126 Rule and delays the compliance deadline to 2004, sources
could still be required to make substantial NOx reductions starting in May
2003.   We expect the Courts to resolve this issue sometime before the 126
litigation commences in early November.

Enron Activities

SIPs are being developed by the states, with a deadline of October 31, so
Environmental Strategies will be spending the next few months working to
ensure that the rules that are crafted in the states provide the most
favorable treatment possible for our assets while providing a competitive
advantage to our traders.   While the delay could benefit some Enron assets
that need to comply with the regulations, it could also benefit our
competitors, who have another year to defer environmental compliance
decisions that would likely increase their costs and create other
disadvantages for them.

We will keep you posted with any developments as they occur.

Jeff Keeler  (202) 466-9157
Mary Schoen (713) 345-7422


i still owe you $30 right?


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/03/2000 09:14
AM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 10/03/2000 09:08 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

Kay:  Attached is the email I received from Steve Curlee.  Who is performing
legal/credit for Enovate?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 09:06 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	09/28/2000 10:14 AM

		 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

Kay:  What is this all about?  I don't know anything about "ENOVATE" .  Is it
an Enron company?  Sara.
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 10:11 AM -----

	Steven Curlee@ENRON
	09/28/2000 09:29 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

Sara, I am forwarding this to you because as you will notice your last name
has been misspelled.  I have been speaking with Peoples recently about the
potential sale of some financial options via Enovate.  This has brought up to
issue of the ISDA agreement.  I don't know if you are the one working on this
specific ISDA, but I got your name off a document showing you as the person
working in general on ISDA agreements between Enovate and third parties.

I will call shortly to insure you receive this, and one more to follow, and
that you are the appropriate person.  If you need to reach me, my extension
is 36900.

Thanks,

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Curlee/Corp/Enron on 09/28/2000
09:19 AM ---------------------------

b.marozas@pecorp.com on 09/27/2000 05:37:59 PM
To: Sara.shackelton@enron.com
cc: Steven.Curlee@enron.com

Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

Sara,

We were trying to finalize the ISDA between PEC and Enovate.
Fred is going to be out of the office until Thursday, but I wanted to
forward the ISDA information he has been working on.
Based on the ISDA materials attached, do you know how close (best quess:
number of days, weeks or months) we are to finalizing the contract?

Thanks,
Brian

 <<MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc>>  <<MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to
Credit Support.doc>>

 <<MEH-PEC ISDA.doc>>  <<MEH-PEC Credit Support Annexy-bi.doc>>

 <<MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc>>

  ----------
  From:  Jacobsen, Fred
  Sent:  Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:43 AM
  To:  Marozas, Brian; Huprikar, Aparna
  Cc:  Nassos, John G.; Pokorny, Judy
  Subject:  Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials

  Attached please find drafts of the following ISDA documents
to be entered into between Enovate, L.L.C. and Peoples Energy Corporation:

  1. Schedule to Master Agreement
  2. Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
  3. Exhibit A to Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
  4. ISDA Master Agreement
  5. ISDA Credit Support Annex.

  Brian, please forward to me the contact information for the
person handling the negotiation of these documents on behalf of Enron.
Thank you, Fred.

  <<File: MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc>><<File:
MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to Credit Support.doc>>

  <<File: MEH-PEC ISDA.doc>><<File: MEH-PEC Credit Support
Annexy-bi.doc>>

  <<File: MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc>>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc
 - MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to Credit Support.doc
 - MEH-PEC ISDA.doc
 - MEH-PEC Credit Support Annexy-bi.doc
 - MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc


Steve, I attach a further draft of the presentation incorporating comments
from John Sherriff.

I have made the following changes:

Cover Page. Listed key themes in the notes
Benefits of Liberalization. Expanded reference to "Improved allocation of
risk"
Benefits- Cost Savings graph. Simplified graph by removing OECD average
Benefits - What went wrong in California. Reworded
Benefits - Improved Customer Choice. Deleted
Policy Goals. Deleted
Successful Transition to Deregulation. Deleted reference to "phased
liberalization"
Successful transition to Deregulation. Replaced reference to "investment"
with reference to "independent regulator"
Transition issues and Solutions. Replaced reference to "Germany" with the
"Netherlands"
Today's New Economy. Deleted reference to "Winner Takes All"
Components of Transformation Process. Moved a number of industries to
"Transformed Markets" category
Enron and the Japanese Market. Referenced broadband
Conclusion. Changed the last bullet point.


The following companies have stated that they will not execute trades with Enron.  Some of these decisions appear to be regional or product specific.  For example Aquila executed a trade in the Central region but will not trade with Sandra.

East - AEP
         Sempra
         Mirant
         J Aaron
         TXU
         Aquila
         BP Amoco

Price - Dynegy
           Bank of Montreal
          Vitol
          Phibro
         J Aaron

Options - Williams
              AEP
              BP Amoco
              Vitol
              Hess (will sell options only)

Central - Mirant
             Enbridge
             Vector P/L
             Transcanada
             Sempra
             BP Canada
             Coral Canada
             PG&E Trading Canada

West - Burlington
           Salt River Project
           Socal Gas
           Dynegy
           Phibro
           TXU
           Coral
           Engage
          WESCO
           Entergy-Koch
           J Aaron (They are clicking to close out positions only)
           Mirant (close out positions only)

Physical Trading

East - The East did not notice any credit hording in the morning.  In the afternoon Tractebel is buying the physical balance of month .04 over the GD swap

Central - Dynegy Canada sold most of the gas to us.  The desk bid was .05 over NGX.  Nicor Hub would not accept an $87 pre-pay for a wheeling fee.

West - EOL Socal cash was trading .08 higher than ICE Socal.  The desk finished short and the market made it very difficult to buy.  EOL SJ cash traded .10 to .20 cents lower than ICE.  The only point without a credit spread was Opal.  Liquidity picked up slightly from Thursday and Friday, but still slow.

AEP was noticeably absent from all regions.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

(See attached file: AGAMAIL.pdf)
 - AGAMAIL.pdf


Thanks.

H. William Swanstrom
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com <mailto:bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com>
(713) 226-1143
?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com [mailto:Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:18 PM
To: BSwanstrom@lockeliddell.com
Subject: Re: Enron Xcelerator

Not clear at this point.? No deals have been done.? My guess is that it
will be Lance and his group.? I will let you know when it gets sorted out.
Mark

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????? "Swanstrom,
Bill"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????

??????????????????? <BSwanstrom@lockeli??????? To:????
"'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'" <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>????????

??????????????????? ddell.com>????????????????
cc:??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

?????????????????????????????????????????????? Subject:???? Enron
Xcelerator????????????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????? 05/20/2001 12:04
PM????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????

Mark, who within the Enron legal group is responsible for Enron
Excelerator?? From what I've heard about this initiative, it sounds like it
may be doing deals similar to what we've done for Enron in the past.? We'd
love to get the opportunity to help -- we have valuable experience we can
bring to bear in this area.? Thanks.

H. William Swanstrom
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com
(713) 226-1143


This counterparty is approved for all products except power and Argentina gas
(no credit deriv too).


Daren-
Thanks for completing Feb 2000 Cashout.
Could you also enter a Demand fee into Sitara for March and April 2000?

March 2000

Sales Ticket # 157278
$0.00 Dollars Due HPLC

Purchase Ticket # 157288
$3,526.98 Dollars Due Duke

I have attached my spreadsheet for support:

Column H is the Over-Delivery quantity total is 24,452 mmbtus
Column T is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due HPLC
$0.00
Column U is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due the
customer $3,526.98.

April 2000

Sales Ticket # 157278
$1,507.56 Dollars Due HPLC

Purchase Ticket # 157288
$1,549.82 Dollars Due Duke

I have attached my spreadsheet for support:

Column H is the Over-Delivery quantity total is 53,206 mmbtus
Column T is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due HPLC
$1,507.56
Column U is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due the
customer $1,549.82

Thanks-
Katherine
5-8643

---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron on
09/11/2000 09:12 AM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer@ECT
09/05/2000 11:25 AM
To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

Done.

Katherine Herrera@ENRON
09/05/2000 10:14 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

Daren,

I believe the best way to enter the fee into Sitara would be as a Demand fee
in your example #1.
If we do the fee this way, we will not  double up the volumes.

I have attached my spreadsheet for support:
THE MOST CURRENT WORKSHEET IS TAB #2 MARKED FINAL

Column G is the Over-Delivery quantity total is 17,278 mmbtus
Column S is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due HPLC
$1,008.87
Column T is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due the
customer $519.73.

Thanks-
Katherine
5-8643

Daren J Farmer@ECT
08/31/2000 05:49 PM
To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

Katherine,

There are 2 ways that I can enter this fee into Sitara:
1) I can put the dollar amount in on day 1 as a demand or facility fee.

2) I need you to give me volume(s) and a price to input into the deal.  I
can't just input a dollar amount in Sitara.

Let me know how you want to handle it.

D

Katherine Herrera@ENRON
08/31/2000 05:28 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

CASHOUT
Please add the following fees for Feb. 2000:

FEE TYPE:
Natural Gas
Physical Forward
Penalty for Over/ Under take

Sales Ticket # 157278
$1,008.87 Dollars Due HPLC

Purchase Ticket # 157288
$519.73 Dollars Due Duke

Thanks- Katherine


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	In Dallas - Lisa, I left the emergency numbers with my group.  they can forward you the e-mail.

Date:		2/12/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 9:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 08/18/2000 11:01
AM ---------------------------

Susan M Landwehr
08/17/2000 11:36 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: O'Connor Op-Ed Piece - California

a little opinion piece from our friend at New Energy, Phil O'COnnor
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES on 08/17/2000
01:22 PM ---------------------------

"Fein, David I. - CHI" <david.fein@piperrudnick.com> on 08/17/2000 11:20:48 AM
To: "'Susan_M_Landwehr@enron.com'" <Susan_M_Landwehr@enron.com>,
"'rboston@enron.com'" <rboston@enron.com>
cc: "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>,
"Skey, Christopher N. - CHI" <christopher.skey@piperrudnick.com>, "Way, Karen
S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com>
Subject: O'Connor Op-Ed Piece - California

We thought that you would find the attached Op-Ed piece that appeared in the
Chicago Tribune today of interest.

PLEASE DON'T SHOOT THE MESSENGER
DEREGULATION NOT THE PROBLEM
By Philip R. O'Connor. Philip R. O'Connor is president of Chicago-based
NewEnergy Midwest, the leading provid-er of...
August 17, 2000
The firestorm raging in the San Diego area that devours homes and likely
will be followed in the spring by mudslides that will carry homes into
ravines isn't what Midwesterners are used to.
But there's no blaming Bad Ol' El Nino this time. The firestorm that has
everyone pointing fingers has to do with electric power shortages, rolling
blackout warnings and summer utility bills that have soared two and
threefold over last summer's.
To avoid "wearing the jacket," (in our Chicago patois), California's
voter-shy public officials and utility executives are blaming Bad Ol'
Deregulation.
Understandably, but regrettably, the media have tended to follow the story
line that electricity deregulation is to blame. Such stories could well
create worry that deregulation in Illinois and elsewhere in the Midwest will
lead to San Diego-style problems.
If anything, deregulation in the Midwest is avoiding the fundamental errors
California made, not only during the two years of deregulation but during
the decade preceding deregulation. In the summer of 1998 the Midwest had
some close calls of its own when triple-digit temperatures drove wholesale
electric prices for certain midday hours to as much as 100 times the normal
price.
The reigning theories in the California panic today are much like the myths
that emerged in the Midwest back then. There were allegations of price
gouging by power producers and warnings that we were moving too fast toward
deregulation--even though there was no retail deregulation and competition
in the Midwest at that time. In fact, it was the lack of retail,
customer-level competition that allowed the wholesale market to fly
completely out of control. Since 1998, the Midwest has begun to get its act
together.
In California, the initial reactions are to put the toothpaste back in the
tube and to burn the witch. But my native state still will need to face up
to its legacy of thinking, "I'll do that tomorrow," while at the same time
trying to regulate free markets as if there were no tomorrow.
Deregulation, which started in California in the spring of 1998, is but a
messenger of painful truths. The truth is that the chickens are coming home
to roost and that any attempt to retreat into the past will produce more
power shortages and higher prices.
There are some big differences between Illinois, the first state in the
Midwest to open up the electric network for customer choice, and California,
the first state in the nation to open up the network for competition.
In spite of a booming California economy spurring massive increases in
electrical demand, not one new power plant came on line during the
1990s--and none since. California thought it could rely on power plants in
other western states, but those plants are now serving growing loads in
their own areas.
In Illinois and elsewhere in the Midwest, new clean natural gas-fired plants
are able to serve during periods of peak demand. Gov. Ryan has convened a
committee to review state and local government handling of proposed "peaker"
plants. It seems likely to keep strict environmental standards in place
while helping to identify ways to reduce uncertainties, speed up
approvals--or disapprovals--and thereby reduce costs and improve power
reliability.
While the Midwest is realizing the benefit of newly constructed transmission
lines that allow access by Chicago and other areas to competitive power
supplies, many areas in California, remain too dependent on just a few local
power plants.
In California, once a utility finishes collecting "stranded-cost" charges to
pay off investments in nuclear plants and high-cost power contracts, price
caps for plain, old utility service based on rates in place prior to
deregulation are lifted. That's why San Diego Gas & Electric, the first
utility to finish collecting stranded costs, merely had the job of acquiring
power in the wholesale market and passing along the cost to customers who
had not switched to new competitive suppliers.
In Illinois and Ohio, by contrast, utility rates are capped at reduced
levels for at least five more years for customers who do not switch.
Illinois and the Midwest have stayed away from such Rube Goldberg
contraptions as the California Power Exchange that was supposed to serve as
a sort of mandatory clearing house for wholesale power transactions but
instead became a sort of private regulator that regulated no better than the
government used to.
The rules of the game in the Golden State could not have been more skewed
against giving opportunities for customers to switch to new competitors or
to take other precautions to avoid high summer power prices during an
unexpected heat wave. My NewEnergy colleagues in California have faced an
ever shifting set of increasingly inhospitable rules. In Illinois, utilities
and new competitive suppliers, have had more flexibility to offer products
that let customers choose between fixed prices that balance out the ups and
downs of the market or prices that float with the seasons.
Importantly, Illinois regulators have been reasonably quick to approve
proposals that let utilities and new suppliers, such as my company, work out
contracts with commercial and industrial customers to reduce their
electrical demand during peak summer hours in return for payments. Such
arrangements, less available in California, are key to avoiding blackouts
and blunting big-price spikes.
As chairman of the Illinois Commerce Commission from 1983 through 1985, I
remember when the costs of new nuclear plants showed up in electric
rates--today's stranded costs. I know what California utility commissioners
must be going through as they seek solutions for problems with roots going
back at least a decade. They'd better have thick skins and nimble minds.
I'll never forget former Gov. Jim Thompson, whose 1982 campaign I co-managed
and who appointed me to the ICC, saying, after several big rate increases,
the political equivalent of "I've never seen this man before in my entire
life." Having been yelled at on the bus by angry consumers a few times on
the way to the office, I could only be happy that Thompson had the good
political judgment to say, "I know not the man," on his own without my
prompting. I felt proud, not betrayed.

David I. Fein
PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE
203 North LaSalle Street
Suite 1800
Chicago, Illinois  60601
312-368-3462
(Fax) 312-630-7418
david.fein@piperrudnick.com

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION FOR ADDRESSEES ONLY

Mike -

I work with Mark Taylor's group and support both EOL and Clickpaper.com on
numerous matters.  Prior to this, I worked with Peter del Vecchio in the pulp
and paper area.

Peter indicated that there was a possible deal being looked at with Itochu
whereby there would be a "regional" Clickpaper.com established in Japan to
assist Itochu in electronically servicing its pulp and paper clients.  My
question to Peter was what software is being proposed to support the deal and
under what licensing arrangement.

My understanding is that a software product provided by Ariba Inc. is used to
support/power Clickpaper.com.  I was previously asked to review the Ariba
software license in relation to Clickpaper.com's ability to establish
"regional" Clickpaper.com systems.  The conclusions reached from this review
were that (1) there are some restrictions on Enron's ability to use the
software for more than the two sites for which the license was originally
obtained (the "regional" sites being considered separate sites) and (2) that
an assignment of the Enron rights is possible to an affiliate (presuming some
level of Enron equity ownership); however, Enron would remain liable for the
use (i.e., license fees and maintenance fees) and misuse of the software.

If the Ariba software is the "Clickpaper software" supporting the proposed
Itochu software license from Clickpaper.com/Enron, I would like to further
explore the exact manner in which this license is being proposed and whether
or not communications with Ariba have been undertaken to ensure this will not
violate our existing software license.

If the "Clickpaper software" is not associated with the Ariba software (and
its license), the analysis of the Ariba software license that I performed is
not applicable.  However, if the "Clickpaper software" involves third party
software and Enron's software license has not been reviewed, an analysis of
this agreement should be undertaken to ensure  Enron can sublicense the
product for use.  This will be especially important if we are intending to
obtain rights to improvements made to this software (e.g., Japanese
translations) which are generally intended to be owned by the owner of the
software and not a licensee.

Please let me know if there is a need to discuss this matter further.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Mike Moran was able to get the securities "standstill" provision removed from
the CA.  It has now been signed by us and returned for execution by Reliant.

Kathy Campos will send to each of you in the morning, a letter we just
received that describes the transaction process.  We are to review an
Information Memorandum (to be provided ASAP) and respond with a non-binding
indication of interest by 5:00 PM, March 15.

The assets are being offered either as a total package, or in any subset(s),
broken down as follows:
 Reliant Energy Gas Transmission and Mississippi River Transmission  (to be
viewed together as a single asset)
 Reliant Energy Field Services
 Reliant Energy Arkla
 Reliant Energy Minnegasco

Bidders can submit separate offers for different subsets of assets (i.e. one
offer for the whole package, and different offers for separate assets).

If we are selected to go on to the next phase, data room visits of 2 days
each will begin on or about March 20.  REI will expect binding offers by
April 20, with final execution of a definitive agreement in late April/early
May.

I will disseminate the Information Memoranda as soon as received.

JNG

To: "Archer, Scott (IBK-DAL)" <sarcher@exchange.ml.com>
cc:

Subject: Reliant Energy - Confidentiality Agreement

Scott,

As we discussed, a signed CA was faxed to your office this evening.  Two
signed originals will be delivered by courier in the morning to Mr. Rufus
Scott for execution by Reliant.

We look forward to receiving the Information Memoranda as soon as possible,
so that we can comply with the time schedule for this transaction.

Regards,

John Goodpasture


All

A reminder that Philip Allen will be presenting to you today in conference
room 32C2 at 4.00 pm.   This will be the first of many training sessions by
department leads with ENA on their respective areas.   Please ensure your
attendance.

Rgds,

Karen.
x54667

Room:  32C2
Time:  4 - 6 pm.

Wednesday, April 18th  Allen, Philip
Wednesday, May 2nd  Arnold, John
Wednesday, May 16th  Davis, Dana
Wednesday, May 30th  Gilbert-Smith, Doug
Wednesday, June 13th  Grigsby, Mike
Wednesday, June 27th  Martin, Thomas
Wednesday, July 11th  Neal, Scott
Wednesday, July 25th  Presto, Kevin
Wednesday, Aug 8th  Herndon, Rogers
Wednesday, Aug 22nd  Schwieger, Jim
Wednesday, Sept 5th  Shively, Hunter
Wednesday, Sept 19th  Sturm, Fletcher


Good job.  Now what price should we bill EES.

Elizabeth L Hernandez
06/22/2000 03:19 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EES pricing issue

Deal 225818 is a deal that was copied from deal 113293 and looks like we have
been invoice EES at NX1 + .235 since 10/99.  If you have any other questions
please get with me.

Chris Germany
06/22/2000 01:20 PM
To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: EES pricing issue

ENA is selling EES gas on CGAS.  Sitara deal #225818.  EES is showing a price
of $3.347 for May production and we are billing them $3.324, which price is
correct?

Thanks


Joe,

OK as long as the number is limited. ,Please, check with Shirley regarding
lunch.
We are already full in this room.

Vince

Joseph Hrgovcic
04/12/2000 03:33 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Presentation by Yannis Tzamouranis at Thursday Staff Meeting

Vince,

 I would like to invite some people from the Weather Derivatives desk to
attend the lunch, if that's OK. One of them is the Australian weather desk's
research/data representative, and it would be good if he could become
familiar with the research group.

Joe

---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
04/12/2000 02:30 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin
Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
SCHILMOELLER/Enron@Gateway, Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT@ECT, Vincent
Tang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alexios Kollaros/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT, Osman
Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Sergeev/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava
Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronnie
Chahal/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clayton
Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ravi
Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Leandro
Ibasco/Corp/Enron@Enron, Yanna Crystal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose
Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samer Takriti/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Guadalupe
Margain/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Presentation by Yannis Tzamouranis at Thursday Staff Meeting

Hello all:

Yannis Tzamouranis will make a presentation at the Research Group's
Thursday staff meeting (4/13/00) entitled:

"Proposal for a new data visualization project"

It will be in EB 30C1 at 11:30.

See you there.

Shirley Crenshaw
713-853-5290


Throughout this week, we have a team from UBS in Houston to introduce and discuss the NETCO business and associated HR matters.

In this regard, please make yourself available for a meeting tonight beginning at 6:00 pm at The Houstonian.  For those outside of Houston, video conferencing arrangements have been made.  In Portland, the meeting will be held in Mt Adams.  In Calgary, the meeting will be held in video room #1.

Time:		6:00 pm
Place:		The Houstonian
		111 N Post Oak Lane
		Houston, TX
		(713) 680-2626
Meeting Name:	"Lone Star"

Please keep this invitation confidential.

If you are unable to make this meeting, please advise Amy FitzPatrick (x52729) or Julie Clyatt (x33256).


Several people are working independently to create a list of talking points and frequently asked questions relating to our new company, UBSW Energy.  Please forward drafts to Jeff Hodge who will compile, edit and coordinate with the EOL group and UBS legal.


I will be in Jacksonville Florida this week negotiating a transaction with
New Jersey Natural Gas.  It is a project development deal utilizing fuel
cells.  The commercial lead is Jeff Ader.  I will leave tomorrow afternoon,
returning on Friday afternoon.

Kay


Hee are Patrick Smith's brief comments regarding our questions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 07:50
AM ---------------------------

Patrick Smith <PatrickAlan@compuserve.com> on 12/14/99 06:12:13 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Linda Swoy <LFSwoy@tecoenergy.com>, Tom Zenner <thz@compuserve.com>,
Linda Miller <lamiller@tecoenergy.com>
Subject: Message from Internet

Mr. Rogers,
Just to quickly address your questions in advance of our call in the
morning, I offer the following:

1.  The debt amount contemplated was based on assumptions given by Enron.
The rate given was $375 /kW or $120MM in debt.  This would be obtained via
a 144A Bond offering without any subdebt.

2.  There are three operating fees listed in the proforma currently:
Management fee ($600k/yr) to the Owners as contracted, O&M Fee ($300k/yr)
to the Operator contemplated to be TECO Power Services ("TPS") and the TPS
Parts Company for a spare engine.  The TPS Spare engine may be eliminated
provided we can get comfort via other methods.  The financing fees were
estimates based on discussions with Enron and our engaging CSFB.

3.  The Maintenance Reserve account is accrued based on operating hours of
the plant and planned major maintenance, as estimated by TPS (the O&M
Operator).  This reserve may be eliminated as we currently are estimating
that this plant will never reach a major outage.

I look forward to discussing these issues with you in the morning.

Regards,
Patrick Smith
TM Power Ventures


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:44 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	FW: Western Issues Update 10-02-2001

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:18 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Bass, Eric; Bike, Anne; Ermis, Frank; Gay, Randall L.; Heu, Mog; Holst, Keith; Huang, Jason; Kuykendall, Tori; Lenhart, Matthew; Lisk, Daniel; Reitmeyer, Jay; Sanchez, Monique; Scott, Susan M.; Smith, Matt; South, Steven P.; Sullivan, Patti; Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry; Wolfe, Jason
Subject:	FW: Western Issues Update 10-02-2001

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitman, Britt
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:16 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Black, Don; Calger, Christopher F.; Davis, Mark Dana; Gaskill, Chris; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Grigsby, Mike; Herndon, Rogers; Johnston, Robert; Lewis, James; Milnthorp, Rob; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Walsh, Kristin
Subject:	Western Issues Update 10-02-2001


do you need any info from me?
How did our volumes look for Sept.?
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000 01:11 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Misti Day                           10/09/2000 12:36 PM

To: Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jill Louie/CAL/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edie Leschber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Anderson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Paula Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faith Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: September Wholesale Volumes

It's that time again for the monthly and quarterly volumetric explanations!
The database for September is now ready for viewing.  Just as a reminder,
this is the shortcut on your desktop called "Statistical Database".

As there is continued investor focus on our Wholesale Operations, Investor
Relations requests that Business Analysis & Reporting provide monthly
volumetric analysis for Wholesale Operations in addition to the quarterly
analysis.  Please review the analysis for September 2000 and provide
explanations for all material changes (+/- 10%) for the year/year,
quarter/quarter, and month/month variances.  The current objective of
Investor Relations is to use this analysis as a resource to answer potential
investor or analyst questions, but it may be used for ad hoc requests and
presentations.   It is essential that the volumes be verified by commercial
personnel.

Please forward your verification and explanations via e-mail to me by 3:00pm
Tuesday, October 10th.  Please feel free to call with any questions.

Thanks,

Misti
x39525


tarry (TAR-ee) verb intr.

   1. To delay or be late in going, coming, or doing.

   2. To wait.

   3. To remain or stay temporarily, as in a place; sojourn.

verb tr.

   To wait for; await.

noun

   A temporary stay; a sojourn.

[Middle English tarien.]

tarry (TAR-ee) adjective

   Of, resembling, or covered with tar.

"You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you.
For Life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.
You are the bows from which your children,
as living arrows, are sent forth."
Kahlil Gibran, Prophet.

This week's theme: words from poetry.

............................................................................
It is not the mountain we conquer but ourselves. -Edmund Hillary,
mountaineer and explorer (1919- )

What to give to the person who has everything? Give the gift of words.
Here is a gift that keeps on giving. To enter a gift subscription of
A.Word.A.Day, please visit http://wordsmith.org/awad/gift.html
To subscribe yourself, use http://wordsmith.org/awad/subscribe.html

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/tarry.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/tarry.ram


Dear Body Shop Member:

During the UBS/Enron transition your Body Shop membership will continue without interruption.  We are working with UBS and Enron to transition payroll deductions and continue exterior door access to the Body Shop.

While we are finalizing these changes please continue your Body Shop membership.

Thank you,
The Body Shop


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 10:37 AM -----

	Charles Ward@ENRON
	09/28/2000 10:21 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carl
Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: SWPC Outstanding Invoices

In order to resolve our warranty issues under the outstanding invoices with
SWPC (both before and after our purchase), I request that Milbank Tweed be
engaged for a limited review of the documentiation surrounding the issues
(including warranty, consequential damage, incremental labor coverage).
Milbank has a depth of project experience on project construction and
equipment suppliers and their agreements.  I would propose the West Coast
office and allow Ed Feo to select the appropriate personnel.

While I beleive that Milbank is not the only firm that can perform this
engagement adequately, I do believe that they could be timely and cost
efficient on a issue as largely commercial issue as this.  Please let me know
your view as we need to resolve our options, and ultimately our course of
action next week.

Chuck Ward


We have sent the first draft of an ISDA with EFET LLC to Deutsche Bank, which mirrored the terms of the Enron NA ISDA with English law amendments.

Are you happy for me to negotiate the ECTRIC ISDA on the same terms with English law amendments? I will run it past tax and credit again. We will be wanting gas as well as lc's in the CSA for both.

Credit think Steve will want a MAC clause which we want to avoid and they have asked me to stall him so I haven't called him back yet but I will tomorrow.

Thanks.
Anna

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Justin
Sent:	04 November 2001 11:43
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Brungs, Ian; Fox, Anna
Subject:	RE: Deutsche Bank AG ("DB") request for ISDA Master Agreement with ECTRIC

sara

anna fox is the one her ...we have already opened discussions with DB about an ISDA with ECTRIC so i don't know why this person is raising this

justin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	02 November 2001 21:58
To:	Boyd, Justin; Simons, Paul; Cooper, Edmund; Dawson, Matthew; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Cc:	Rohauer, Tanya; Cook, Mary; St. Clair, Carol
Subject:	Deutsche Bank AG ("DB") request for ISDA Master Agreement with ECTRIC

Steve Kessler (212-469-8202) with DB legal has called to request an ISDA Master Agreement with ECTRIC.  Who is the appropriate legal contact in London to initiate this process?

DB has an ISDA with ENA.  Steve told me that DB also has an ISDA with Enron Credit Limited.  Is a master netting arrangement appropriate here?

London:  Please let me know on Monday which lawyer will handle this ISDA request.

Jay:  Please let legal know if this arrangement requires a master netting agreement.

Thanks.   Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


I can't find any of the reports that Kim Olinger used to run out of Unify.  BUT, Jeanne Wukasch was in Kim's group and she would know how to run them.  I believe they were called Service P&L reports.  The only thing we would use them for now are transport demand charges.


Talk with the person in accounting that deals with Teco.  See if they are
using a different counterparty now at the plant.

d

Michael Olsen@ENRON
02/23/2001 02:37 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: meter 6884

I may need more assistance on this issue.  I tried to extend the deal and it
blocked me saying...

Teco Gas Processing Company is suspended.
Deal with inactive or suspended counterparty may not be extended.

 Any suggestions?

Daren J Farmer@ECT
02/23/2001 01:25 PM
To: Michael Olsen/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: meter 6884

You can extend them, but make sure that the volume is zero.

D

Michael Olsen@ENRON
02/23/2001 12:50 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: meter 6884

Volume management was wondering if deals 137870 and 235670 needed to be
extended into 2001.  These are deals with Teco.  Let me know if you need me
to extend them.


I found it!  It was in a box in my garage.  Thanksgiving was just ok - have had better.  how was yours and what did you do this weekend?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Olinger, Kimberly S.
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 7:50 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:

just wanted to remind you to start looking for your c-card now!  don't know if you want to scuba or not, but nice to
have options.

Hope you had a nice thanksgiving - we need to go for drinks soon!

Kim


FYI
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 07/24/2000 09:16 AM -----

	"Tiehen, Thomas M." <ttiehen@TENASKA.com>
	07/20/2000 01:03 PM

		 To: "'Mike.Mazowita@enron.com'" <Mike.Mazowita@enron.com>,
"'carl.tricoli@enron.com'" <carl.tricoli@enron.com>, "'Dan.Lyons@enron.com'"
<Dan.Lyons@enron.com>
		 cc: "Howell, H. Dwight" <dhowell@TENASKA.com>, "Quinn, Ronald N."
<rquinn@TENASKA.com>
		 Subject: SWPC Warranty Claim

We have changed the letter slightly:
  <<TIVTPSWPCWarranty.doc2.doc>>

 - TIVTPSWPCWarranty.doc2.doc


I vote we don't reply at all

	Randal Maffett
	08/22/2000 09:03 AM

		 To: Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy
Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE:kafus

I would forward to Legal and review before we sent any response.

RANDY
---------------------- Forwarded by Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000
09:02 AM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
08/22/2000 07:33 AM
To: Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:kafus

Any thoughts on how to respond?  This came in via our web site.  Please
advise.

Thanks.

Eric

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Thode/Corp/Enron on 08/22/2000 07:33
AM ---------------------------
From: Cindy Derecskey on 08/21/2000 08:45 AM
To: Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: kafus

Please respond.

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 08/21/2000 08:44 AM -----

	w g wettleson <wgw@sprintmail.com>
	08/18/2000 09:24 PM

		 To: public-relations@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: kafus

dont think for a moment your attempt to get kafus for pennies on the
dollar from under its shareholders will go unnoticed - i for one would
love to explain how it went from a shareholders view on a website. that
was my retirement money your messing with.


I'm forwarding a notice from the California ISO, telling us it will be
responding to a very broad Subpoena from the Electricity Oversight Board
(EOB).  Many of the questions relate to the period of from September 2000
through November 2000.  The ISO indicates that it will be answering the
requests because the EOB has granted what it believes is an adequate
protective order.  This order agrees to keep the answers to certain questions
confidential, but to provide them to the CPUC and the AG if they agree to
keep them confidential.  If we have concerns about the confidential order we
are supposed to advise the ISO by Monday 12/1, at 9:00 a.m.  The subpoeana,
and confidential order, and a letter explaining the treatment of the various
requests are attached.

I am assuming that because the order appears to protect our commercial
interests, we will not protest this.  Richard - let me know if you want to
have a conference call on this and I'll have Lysa set one up.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 08:33 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Woertz, Byron" <BWoertz@caiso.com>
12/05/2000 05:34 PM

To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice - Electricity Oversight Board (EOB) Further Subpoena

  ISO Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

  The Electricity Oversight Board ("EOB") has issued a further
subpoena to the ISO in the context of its ongoing investigation of
California's electricity grid and markets during and subsequent to the
Summer 2000. The subpoena seeks information that is confidential under ISO
Tariff Section 20.3.2. This notice is provided in accordance with Tariff
Section 20.3.4 and includes the subpoena as an attachment.

  The EOB has issued three letters in which it sets forth the
confidential treatment it will afford confidential information produced by
the ISO including:

* an initial letter dated July 20 which addresses data subject to ISO
Tariff Section 20.3.;
* a letter dated July 28 which addresses additional data; and
* a letter dated October 3 which clarifies that the confidential
treatment set forth in the July 20 and 28 letters will be applied by the EOB
on an ongoing basis in its investigation of the electricity markets.

  The three letters are attached to this notice.

  The ISO will mark as confidential documents it produces to
the EOB that contain information subject to 20.3.2. It is the ISO's
understanding that the confidential treatment provided by the EOB to
information subject to 20.3.2 is satisfactory to Market Participants. The
ISO intends to comply with the EOB subpoena in a timely manner on December
18. If a Market Participant requires any further confidentiality protection,
the ISO expects such Market Participant to take timely action to obtain
directly from the EOB such further protection so that production by the ISO
is not delayed. The ISO would appreciate being notified of any such action
and its resolution so that it can comply with its responsibilities as set
forth in ISO Tariff section 20.3.

  The EOB contact related to the subpoena is Eric Saltmarsh
who can be reached at (916) 322-8601.

  Any concerns relating to the EOB's subpoena should be
communicated by 9:00 a.m. on Monday, December 11th, to Jeanne Sol, at
jsole@caiso.com <mailto:jsole@caiso.comburns@caiso.com> , and copied to
Charlie Robinson at crobinson@caiso.com <mailto:crobinson@caiso.com>  and
Norma Formanek at nformanek@fbm.com <mailto:nformanek@fbm.com> .

  Jeanne M. Sol,
  Regulatory Counsel
  California ISO
  (916) 608-7144

   <<7-21EOB4.pdf>>  <<Confiden.pdf>>  <<EOBoard0.pdf>>
<<EOBoard1.pdf>>
 - 7-21EOB4.pdf
 - Confiden.pdf
 - EOBoard0.pdf
 - EOBoard1.pdf


Gary:
Thanks.  This worked.
Carol


Please remember that our 11:00am conference call for today was moved to
5:00pm (CST).

Sue Nord, Sr. Director
Government Affairs
713 345-4196


Attached is the revised Petition whcih has been redlined against the draft provided last Saturday (September 15, 2001).  The primary addition is the Senate Resolution on September 14 which declared that there was no longer an emergency.  The tables in the Petition are being revised and should not be reviewed at this time.

The following remains to be done:
   1.  Prepare the application for rehearing and request for immediate stay.  This will be done by Douglass and will include new material not previously submitted (the commerce clause argument, a statement regarding the importation of power into California, the Senate Resolution of September 14, and the sealed declarations showing irreparable injury).
   2.  The refusal to grant the immediate stay will be the vehicle to satisfy the exhaustion of remedies issue so it will be necessary to force the Commission to act or to take some action which is tantamount to a denial.
   3.  The Petition must be placed in final form.  This will require that a determination be made who will be a Petitioner in addition to Enron (the draft Petition assumes there will be direct access customers as Petitioners).  Also, all citations and quotes will be verified, and the page references inserted from the Exhibit Folio.
   4.  The documents supporting the Petition will have to be compiled and placed into an Exhibit Folio.  This will include the Application for Rehearing and sealed declarations.
   5.  It may be necessary to compile a folio of non-California authorities.  I will check the California Rules of Court.
   6.  It will be necessary to prepare an Application for Immediate Stay and a proposed Order.
   7.  All pleadings will have to be prepared for filing and service.

It is my assumption that the PUC will act on Thursday September 20, that the Application for Rehearing will be filed on September 21, and that the Petition will be filed at the earliest possible time during the week of September 24.

Please provide your comments on the Petition no later than noon on Wednesday, September 19, 2001.

Thanks.  EWD


Rebecca:

Attached is the Annex B for Deal No. YA2985.1.  Please attach Annex A, Annex B and the Canadian Annex, since this is a cross border transaction.  Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie


HOLIDAY SAFETY REMINDER

The holiday season can mean an increased risk of fires and a higher potential
for criminal activity due to people taking advantage of convenient downtown
shopping and because of the increased number of special events and office
parties.  We would like to pass along a few safety and security tips from the
City of Houston Fire Department and the Houston Police Department.

? Please do not prop open stairwell doors or doors to the freight elevators.
This defeats security.

? Use only artificial trees and greenery in decorating your office space. Do
not place cut trees or greenery within the building. Cut trees become major
fire hazards when they dry out.

? Office parties or the holiday mood may distract you.  Be alert for thieves
who try to take advantage of the holiday season. Sometimes just having fewer
people at work during the holidays creates an opening for thieves. If you see
someone that does not appear to belong in your work area, immediately call
the Enron Security Console at 713-853-5360.

? Keep your purse or wallet with you at all times or locked away in a drawer
or closet.

? If you go shopping, invite a friend to go along. Try not to overload
yourself with packages.  When you return, lock your gifts away in a safe
place.

? Always be aware of your surroundings while in a public area. If things don,
t look right, follow your instincts and avoid going into the area.

? When waiting for a ride home after hours, remain inside the building near a
card-reader door until you see your ride arrive.

? If office parties are on company premises and involve alcoholic beverages
or public invitees, call security at 713-853-5360.  Security will advise you
as to company guidelines.


Jim,

Please just look at the transport piece below.  I already have an answer on
NB0242.B

Thanks,
Cathy
---------------------- Forwarded by Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 01:41
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Cathy Sprowls                           12/13/2000 01:35 PM

To: Jim Little/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Central June financial liquidation questions

Jim

There are two items in the June Central Fred file that we need help with:

NB0242.B    $768,761    Phillip says this is not Central's.  Can you take a
look?
Transport    $480,272    Can you provide any detail for what is included here?

Thanks for your help.

Cathy


Paul:

It seems to me these types of transactions (at least new ones) could be
covered by an ISDA with some creative confirm work on our part.  It's
certainly not necessary for us to wait for ISDA to get its act together (it
may be quite a wait) - we can come up wit our own definitions.  The financial
power trades might be something of a stretch but we have never had the
question fully reviewed.  I guess this is another matter to keep in mind as
the power pool is restructured:  to the extent we have any influence over the
resulting structure, it would be nice if it fit easily into a standard
financial trading structure.

Just random thoughts.

Mark

Paul Simons
11/03/98 12:52 PM
To: Paul Waine/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ISDA Master -ECTRIC- Morgan Stanley

Paul

Let's get the ISDA in place and then bring in deal types (b) and (c) if and
when possible.

ISDA have been on the verge of amending the Commodity Definitions since I
arrived at Enron!

I'll leave it to Shari to respond to your points of detail. Thanks.

Paul

Paul Waine
03/11/98 17:34
To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ISDA Master -ECTRIC- Morgan Stanley

Shari, a new question arises re this master. ECTRIC trades following
commodity derivatives with MS: (a) oil swaps (priced in USD), (b) UK
electricity - "EFA" elec. forward agreement (priced in GBP) and (c) Nordic
power (priced in norwegian kroner). Are all these commodities covered by the
master - at present the latter 2 are probably not covered by an ISDA
commodity definition, although I understand A&O plan to work on these
definitions with interested parties in UK/Europe. How does the ISDA deal with
FX differences - I guess there is a standard approach - GBP and NOK converted
to USD at spot rate for collateral purposes.

Regards

Paul

Shari Stack
28/10/98 19:11
To: Paul Waine/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ISDA Master -ECTRIC- Morgan Stanley

I was forwarded a copy of your email to Marie Heard and Paul Simons dated
10/19/98. In response to your queries:

1. Date of the Agreement: Notes in our file state that "Francesca" in London
advised that the earliest outstanding trade between the 2 counterparts is
Nov. 4 '93. From a legal perspective, it does no harm to leave the date as is
since all it means is that the Agreement is effective as of that day.

2. "Transferable Letter of Credit": ECT's standard is to have "transferable"
L/C's in order to be consistent with the "transfer" language included in our
Master Agreements. The rationale is that if ECT wanted to transfer its
rights/obligations under the Agreement to an Affiliate, we would want the L/C
to be transferable as well. Put another way - having a non-transferable L/C
would be at cross purposes with having a transferable Agreement.

Also, we in Houston were not aware that ECTRIC does not normally use
"transferable" L/C's. Perhaps this should be made clear to whomever does
ECTRIC's documentation in the future.

In any case, can you pls let me know whether you are happy for "transferable"
to remain in or whether I should go back to MS and ask for it to be
deleted.

3. Name of Guaranteed Party: Agree to change; Marie will have a new first
page of the Guarantee prepared and forwarded to you.

4. Guarantee from MS: The normal procedure is for them to send us their
signed Guarantee when they return our execution copies. The form, though, has
already been agreed and Marie will send you a copy for your information.

5. Collateral: I have discussed this with Paul Simons. As I understand it,
you have concerns whether in the event of the insolvency of MS, ECTRIC could
redeem cash or US T-Bills in order to fulfil MS's obligations to ECTRIC. Mark
Taylor feels that ECTRIC would have an enforceable security interest in cash
even though it may be held in London. Regarding the T-Bills, Paul  mentioned
that there is to be a meeting on this and other matters in the next few
weeks.

In order for us to go ahead and finalise the Agreement, I would be happy to
go back to MS and ask that US T-Bills be deleted as a form of Eligible
Collateral.

Pls let me know with regard to points 2 & 5 as soon as possible.

Kind regards,

Shari Stack


Hi John, Colin,

As a follow up to what we discussed, I have to do some tweaking to the excel
sheet and will have it out for your review on Friday.  However if has to be
up earlier than Friday, do give me a shout and we can try to work it out.

Lindon Chiu
Technologist
Enron Corp
(800)973-6766 x 57758


Russell:
Our credit person is okay with deleting the Independent Amount definition.
Susan will make all the changes and coordinate with you in getting this
signed up hopefully sometime this week.  Thanks for your help on this.
Carol


thsx for the note Dick - look forward to working with you.

regards
Delainey


...we'll probably bitch about Wheeler Ridge....not sure if we'll 69 the
CSA....

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:58 PM
To: Cherry, Brian
Subject: Re: FW: I9907003 Ruling re Notice of a Full Panel Hearing

yep.


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Wednesday, December  12, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Tuesday, December  11, 2001)
Click here to access index history


Critical Migration Information:

1. Your scheduled Outlook Migration Date is THE EVENING OF : May 17th
2. You need to press the "Save My Data" button (only once) to send us your
pre-migration information.
3. You must be connected to the network before you press the button.
4. If a POP-UP BOX appears, prompting you to "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"
please  select TRUST SIGNER.
5. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal or calendar
after you click on the button will need to be manually re-added into Outlook
after you have been migrated.
6. Clicking this button does not complete your migration to Outlook. Your
migration will be completed  the evening of your migration date.

    Failure to click on the button means you WILL NOT get your Calendar,
Contacts, Journal and ToDo information imported into Outlook the day of your
migration and could result in up to a 2 week delay to restore this
information.

If you encounter any errors please contact the resolution center @
713-853-1411


Ted / Sally

We took as an action from the last meeting the need to re-authorise all
traders within the metals global businesses, sign this list off with the
EnronMetals Managing Directors and accompany this list with a note
highlighting the dangers of non authorised trading activity.

Due to the storm here yesterday we had to delay the operational control
meeting with the MDs until today and therefore hope to have this out tomorrow
with effect from COB 31 st.

Apologies for the delay - any issues please call

Regards

Mike


Thought you might want some late breaking news.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
11:34 AM ---------------------------

Jackson Logan
11/02/2000 06:11 PM
To: jlogan@hough.com, cshi@dynegy.com, jknight@knightrealestate.com,
LtColby.H@att.net, Chris Price/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason Vogler/NA/Enron@Enron,
Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Bagwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Voter alert

---------------------- Forwarded by Jackson Logan/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 06:09
PM ---------------------------

"Derek Anderson" <danders@ruf.rice.edu> on 11/02/2000 05:25:04 PM
Please respond to <danders@rice.edu>
To: "Andy Rapp \(E-mail\)" <arapp@ppchouston.com>, "Brian Thorp"
<Brian_Thorp@AIMFUNDS.COM>, "Chad Turner" <chad.turner@ev1.net>, "Dave
Lawrence" <david.lawrence@citicorp.com>, "Greg Martin"
<gmartin@ect.enron.com>, "'Jackson Logan \(E-mail\) '" <jlogan3@enron.com>,
"James Sivco" <james.sivco@chase.com>, "Jennifer Harvin \(E-mail\)"
<jharvin@swbanktx.com>, "JohnLawrence@smhhou. com" <JohnLawrence@smhhou.com>,
"Karoline Duessel" <Karoline_Duessel@AIMFUNDS.COM>, "Kevin W. Moody"
<MoodyK@hdvest.com>, "Lauren Barrash" <LBareass@aol.com>, "Lorna Muniz"
<lorna.muniz@carlberg.com>, "Pepper Barlow" <pepper.barlow@worldnet.att.net>,
"Tim Carlson \(E-mail\)" <tcarlson@ppchouston.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Voter alert

?

?Subject:  Voter alert

Due to an anticipated voter turnout much  larger?
than originally expected,
the polling facilities may not be  able to handle?
the load all at once.
Therefore, Republicans are  requested to vote on?
Tuesday, November 7, and
Democrats and  Independents on Wednesday, November? 8.
Please pass this message along  and help us to make sure that nobody gets
left out.
> >2000  Presidential Election Commission

Do You Yahoo!?
>From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your  answer.


Chris:

> Attached please find a preliminary draft of the Incumbency Certificate
> that Citibank requires.  You will need to include the appropriate names,
> titles and contact information on the Certificate.  According to Carolyn
> Campbell, Andrea Mahar is the contact person at Citibank.  Andrea's number
> is 212-657-1007, and she will likely ask regarding the
> nature/timing/amounts of the disbursements.  In past deals, Citibank has
> provided us with a fee schedule and a list of money market investment
> options.  You might ask Andrea if she will forward that information to
> you.  According to Carolyn, Andrea might refer you to a woman named
> Estelle Lawrence at 212-657-2076, but the initial contact needs to be with
> Andrea.
>
Don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.

> Regards,
>
> Marisa
>
>  <<ENAIncumbencyCertificate.DOC>>
>
>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - ENAIncumbencyCertificate.DOC


Please send the following e-mail addresses and telephone #s to bwhite@
pureresources.com:

me
Bruce Oakley at B&P
Steve Pruett at Enron


Energy Representatives...
Today's energy committee meetings will take place as scheduled.  The
Business Continuity Subcommittee will meet at 1:30pm followed by the Energy
Committee Meeting at 3pm.  We will meet again at EPRI.  Please RSVP your
participation.  An agenda and further information needed to prepare for the
meetings will be available in a seperate e-mail.  Thanks for your patience
and quick response.  Laura


Per our discussion.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 08/10/99 01:39
PM ---------------------------

Richard A Blandford
08/10/99 10:55 AM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Tomaski/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Evan Betzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David L Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Lakeland Termsheet

Attached for your information is the most recent Lakeland termsheet.
Richard, I would like to see where you guys are with respect to remodeling
the deal by the end of today if possible.
Thank you,
Rick Blandford


Teco Tap       30.000 / Enron ; 120.000 / HPL Gas Daily


David,

This ETA is for ClickPaper.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 05:11 PM -----

	Lisa Lees
	10/30/2000 05:06 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Australia ETA

Last ETA from Travis' request is attached below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 04:00 PM
---------------------------

Justin Timothy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/30/2000 04:42 PM
To: Lisa Lees@ECT
cc:
Subject: ETA

Lisa,

As requested.

Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
31/10/2000 09:42 AM ---------------------------

Alison Keogh
31/10/2000 09:39 AM
To: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: ETA

Alison Keogh
Legal Assistant

Enron Australia Pty Ltd
Ph: 612 9229 2316
Fx: 612 9229 2350


Bart-here is the information you requested.  One note, the work that Andy
Schiffrin has been doing on the Interconnection Agreement has been quite
significant, and represents the bulk of the fees.

To date, we have billed $44,722.21, which remain outstanding.  Copies of
these invoices are being sent separately.

In the months of September and to date in October, unbilled fees are
approximately $11,000.

As to future work, which would include negotiating and finalizing the
Interconnection Agreement and negotiating the sale agreement, I estimate
$30,000.

Let me know if there is anything else you need or if you have any questions.

Regards

John L. Keffer
King & Spalding
713 751 3255
713 751 3280 (fax)
jkeffer@kslaw.com

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.


We have not made this payment.

	Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/23/2001 10:46 AM

		 To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: Consulting Agreements with lobbyists

Marchris,

I am getting ready to request a wire transfer in the amount of $7,500 to be
paid to Albert Lorenzo with Quantum Results, Inc. in connection with the
Consulting  Services Agreement we have with him.

Please advise if your department has already taken care of this payment
and/or confirm that you want me to take care of this payment.

Thank you.

Kathleen

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ann Elizabeth White
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:40 PM
To: Marchris Robinson; jsteffe; Ben Jacoby
Cc: gkrause; Steven Krimsky; Kathleen Carnahan
Subject: Consulting Agreements with lobbyists
Importance: High

As you know, in the last few months we have had discussions regarding the
retention of lobbyists to perform services on our Florida Power Development
Projects.  It was decided that we would have the lobbyists retained through
the Government Affairs group.  Two recent agreements, one with Quantum
Results and another with Tripp, Scott, provided for payments to be made at
certain junctures of our development process.  It has come to our attention
that these payments were not timely made.   In order to make sure that we
don't inadvertently miss any future payments, I am proposing that:

1.  We continue to retain the consultants through execution of a consulting
services agreement signed by Government Affairs.  The consulting agreements
will be prepared in duplicate originals so that the lobbyist keeps one copy
and Enron keeps one copy.

2.  Legal will retain Enron's executed original and provide it to Kay Young,
who maintains a database of all consulting agreements and confidentiality
agreements entered into by ENA entities.

3.  Legal will distribute a copy of the executed document to government
affairs for their records.

4.  Legal will distribute a copy of the executed document to Kathleen
Carnahan who will set up a payment schedule.  Unlike our real property option
agreements that have a date certain for payment, these agreements often have
payment schedules dependent upon some approval process.  Thus, it will be
important for all of us to keep Kathleen in the loop as to dates of hearings
or approvals so that she will know if it is time for a payment.

5.  Kathleen will provide notices to government affairs that a payment is
due, and the amount of the payment and arrange for reimbursement of such
payment out of the development group's RC.

6.  Government affairs will make the payments and be reimbursed out of the
development group's RC.

Please advise if this system will work for you so that we can undertake to
have Kathleen begin setting up a payment schedule.

My strong preference is that we continue to keep things flowing through the
government affairs group so that we consistently maintain the lobbyist
relationship.  However, this will require government affairs have some way of
monitoring the agreements.  I think we fix that problem with having Kathleen
keep a consultant schedule just as she keeps an option schedule.

I'm going on vacation as of next Wednesday so your response by Tuesday will
be greatly appreciated.


I think you need to push Wasaff
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
01:06 PM ---------------------------

Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com> on 11/22/2000 12:46:29 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: FW: a heartwarmer: Special Delivery

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
*713-753-5986
 *713-753-7626
* yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

This email, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  Any
review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information
for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all
copies of this message.  Thank you.

>      No one expected the letter marked Special Delivery.  Who sent it?
> Where was it from?
>      Richard shares a true and remarkable Thanksgiving story today.  You
> may want to grab a tissue, because before you're done reading, you'll have
> a new appreciation of what you're grateful for this holiday season.
> Thanks
> Richard!
> _________________________________
>
> SPECIAL DELIVERY
>
>      This past spring my wife passed away after a six-month battle with
> colon cancer.
>      She spent two months, last November and December, in a convalescent
> home.  I visited her every day and watched her condition change from bad
> to
> worse, although some days she would rally and seem to have a very good
> day.
> Her spirits rarely faltered as she maintained a cheerful outlook and
> seldom, if ever, complained about anything.
>      Each day, she had a request for some food that she had a craving for.
> These cravings ranged from all varieties of fruit to pizza.  On my visits,
> I always brought what she had requested.  She always had me help her with
> her laps, which consisted of her walking from her hospital bed to one end
> of the hospital corridor and back, once, twice and even three times, on a
> good day.
>      You see, she thought, and I hoped, that she would beat this terrible
> disease.  After New Years, I brought her home and she was very happy being
> in her own bed.  On the 12th of February, she quietly slipped away, with
> my
> daughter, a few close family members and me at her bedside.
>      Now with the holidays fast approaching my thoughts often turn to
> holiday celebrations of the past and my daughter often asks me what are we
> going to do without mom here?
>      The doorbell rang recently, and as I answered the door I was greeted
> by the postman.  He handed me a letter.  It was marked Special Delivery
> and
> as I read the return address, I saw that it was from the convalescent home
> where my wife had stayed.  I signed for the letter and thought to myself
> it
> was nice of someone from the home to remember us at this time of year.
>      There are no words to explain my elation as I took out the folded
> pages from the envelope and began to read the first page:
>
>      Thanksgiving, 1999
>
>      To My Beloved Family,
>
>        I do not know if I will be with you next Thanksgiving or not,
>        but please know that my spirit and my heart will be with you.
>
>        I am reminded this day of all the wonderful holidays that we
>        had together over the years.  Everyone was a precious day
>        to me, especially thinking about them now.  The two of you
>        must be strong and I am sure that you will be.
>
>        Richard, I hope that you decorate the table gaily with a nice
>        tablecloth, fine linen place mats, and our best china and
>        silverware.  Remember the two silver candle holders you
>        gave me on our 25th anniversary?  You could use those as
>        a center piece and maybe you and Tricia could each light
>        one candle as you say what you are thankful for.
>
>        Look in the big Betty Crocker cookbook?  Near the pages
>        on how to prepare a turkey for baking, you will find my
>        grandmother's old recipe and also aunt Clara's recipe for
>        fruit salad.  I am positive between you and Tricia you can
>        put together a dinner fit for a King -- and Queen, which
>        you both are.
>
>        Be assured, that wherever I am, I will in some way be
>        present with you and so you need not feel alone.
>
>        I am writing this from my hospital bed and Karen, the
>        charge nurse, is helping me . I told her to hold this letter
>        for me until next Thanksgiving and then to mail it Special
>        Delivery.
>
>        I must stop now as tears are blurring my vision.  Always
>        know that I love you both and will always be with you on
>        every occasion like this one.  I know that I can be proud
>        of you and that you will have a wonderful day.
>
>        May God and his blessings be with you always,
>                                             Mom


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 09:04 AM -----

	Garrick Hill
	10/25/2000 05:36 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Mazowita/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Brazos Letter - Draft for Tick

Attached is the document we've drafted that we wish to send to Steve Tick in
the morning.  Please provide your comments or approval to send this out as
quickly as possible.

RH


Great
You Are on for the 23
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
Dept. of Industrial Engineering
        and Operations Research
4117 Etcheverry Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
Fax:      (510) 642-1403
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

----- Original Message -----
From: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>
Cc: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

>
> Shmuel,
>
> Sorry for not getting back to you earlier.
> If the 23rd of October is still open, I can make the presentation on this
> day.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu> on 08/30/2000 08:18:15 AM
>
> To:   <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron
>
>
> Originally you mentioned October 23 so I reserved that week which is still
> open.
> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
> Dept. of Industrial Engineering
>         and Operations Research
> 4117 Etcheverry Hall
> University of California
> Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
> e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
> phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
> Fax:      (510) 642-1403
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> To: <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>
> Cc: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; <Ashley.Baxter@enron.com>;
> <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 9:03 AM
> Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron
>
>
> >
> > Shmuel,
> >
> > Let's see if we can either rearrange the seminar speakers
> > or change the date of our visit to the campus. Ashley Baxter, our
> > coordinator is very efficient and
> > got a faculty room for a presentation on Monday morning on the 16th.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu> on 08/29/2000 05:37:33 PM
> >
> > To:   <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron
> >
> >
> > Dear Vince. I spoke too soon. Apparently the seminar slot on the 16 was
> > already filled. I will see if I can switch the speaker for that week to
> the
> > following week. In any case we are on for dinner on the 16.
> > /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
> > Dept. of Industrial Engineering
> >         and Operations Research
> > 4117 Etcheverry Hall
> > University of California
> > Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
> > e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
> > phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
> > Fax:      (510) 642-1403
> > ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> > To: <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>
> > Cc: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; <Ashley.Baxter@enron.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 5:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Shmuel,
> > >
> > > The date of our trip to Berkeley has been set. It will be October 16th
> > and
> > > 17th
> > > (Monday and Tuesday).
> > >
> > > I shall be glad to make a presentation on energy derivatives markets
> > > (development of the markets in the US and Europe, valuation
> difficulties,
> > > Enron's role
> > > in developing the forward markets for natural gas and electricity).
> > >
> > > Please, let me know if this topic would be of interest to you. If this
> is
> > > the
> > > case, I shall follow with a title and an abstract.
> > >
> > > By the way, are you free for dinner on Monday?
> > >
> > > Vince
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu> on 08/24/2000 08:59:38 AM
> > >
> > > To:   "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> > > cc:
> > > Subject:  Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron
> > >
> > >
> > > Great. Our seminars are 3:30 to 5PM. If it works for you please send
me
> a
> > > title and abstract.
> > > /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > > Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
> > > Dept. of Industrial Engineering
> > >         and Operations Research
> > > 4117 Etcheverry Hall
> > > University of California
> > > Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
> > > e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
> > > phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
> > > Fax:      (510) 642-1403
> > > ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> > > To: "Shmuel Oren" <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>
> > > Cc: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; "Ashley Baxter"
> > > <Ashley.Baxter@enron.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 9:58 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Shmuel,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the message. I am working with our recruiter, Ashley
> Baxter,
> > > > to finalize the date of the trip. I shall shoot for October the 23rd
> > > > if this date works for the rest of our team.
> > > >
> > > > Vince
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu> on 08/23/2000 11:46:19 AM
> > > >
> > > > To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
> > > > cc:
> > > > Subject:  Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dear Vince.
> > > > I sent you a reply earlier this month but I haven't heard from you
> > about
> > > the
> > > > date of your visit. Our department has a Seminar every Monday. If
you
> > can
> > > > schedule your visit on a Monday I would like to invite you to give a
> > > seminar
> > > > which will be attended by many of our graduate students and faculty
> and
> > > will
> > > > give you an opportunity to tell them about your program. With
> > sufficient
> > > > lead-time I can advertise the seminar in the Hass school to their
> > > financial
> > > > engineering students.
> > > > Shmuel.
> > > > /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > > > Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
> > > > Dept. of Industrial Engineering
> > > >         and Operations Research
> > > > 4117 Etcheverry Hall
> > > > University of California
> > > > Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
> > > > e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
> > > > phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
> > > > Fax:      (510) 642-1403
> > > > ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
> > > > To: <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>; <vkamins@enron.com>;
> > > > <ashley.baxter@enron.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:59 AM
> > > > Subject: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Shmuel,
> > > > >
> > > > > I hope you remember me. I visited you together with Aram
> Sogomonian,
> > a
> > > > > good friend of mine, a few years ago. I am currently responsible,
> > among
> > > > > other things, for recruiting graduates with finance and/or
> technical
> > > > > backgrounds at the University of Berkeley. I would be glad to give
> > you
> > > a
> > > > > call and talk more about the details of our program. My colleague,
> > > > > AshleyBaxter, from the Analyst/Associate Program at Enron would
> join
> > me
> > > > > as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am sending you a copy of the brochure about the Analyst /
> Associate
> > > > > Program.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vince Kaminski
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Vincent Kaminski
> > > > > Managing Director - Research
> > > > > Enron Corp.
> > > > > 1400 Smith Street
> > > > > Room EB1962
> > > > > Houston, TX 77002-7361
> > > > >
> > > > > Phone: (713) 853 3848
> > > > > Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
> > > > > E-mail: vkamins@enron.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


Launch.


pocket veto (POK-it VEE-toh) noun

   An indirect veto of a bill as a result of the president's failure to sign
   it within ten days of the adjournment of Congress; a similar holding of
   a bill by a state governor or other executive.

[From the notion that the bill is held in the pocket unsigned. From Latin
veto (I forbid).]

   "President Clinton blocked a similar bill from becoming law with
   a pocket veto last December."
   Jake Lewis, Bankrupt Policies, Multinational Monitor (Washington),
   May 2001.

This week's theme: words with presidential connections.

Today's AWAD is sponsored by NannyTax, Inc., providing tax compliance services
to employers of domestic help. For useful information and a free consultation,
please visit: http://www.nannytax.com

Sponsor AWAD and reach more than 500,000 people. Contact sponsor@wordsmith.org.

............................................................................
The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad. -Salvador
Dali, painter (1904-1989)

Subscribe:    http://wordsmith.org/awad/subscribe.html
Unsubscribe:    http://wordsmith.org/awad/unsubscribe.html
Change address:   http://wordsmith.org/awad/address-change.html
Gift subscription:  http://wordsmith.org/awad/gift.html

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/pocket_veto.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/pocket_veto.ram