FYI.
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000 11:39 AM -----

	Paul.TYO.Davis@BakerNet.com
	05/19/2000 07:15 AM

		 To: Alan.Aronowitz@enron.com
		 cc: Joseph.P.Hirl@enron.com, John.Viverito@enron.com,
Rousseau.Anai@enron.com, Mark.Taylor@enron.com, Hideo.Ohta@BAKERNET.com,
Nicholas.O'Day@enron.com
		 Subject: Enron Online: Counterparty Authority

In view of the importance of this issue it is desirable to deal with it in
detail.

1.  The Issue

The essential issue we are focussing on is that set out in my email of May 12,
i.e. the need to avoid the possibility of a counterparty being able to claim
that the transaction is not binding because:

(a) it was outside the company's business purposes, or
(b) execution of the application was not authorized.

This issue is not unique to Japan

There is no question as to any specific Japanese laws impacting on the trading
of any of the products through the internet, including issues as to
contractual
enforceability of contracts entered into via the internet, on which we advised
on 15 March.  A copy of that advice is attached to the bottom of this email.

Neither is there any question, if the above issue is resolved, of the
Electronic
Trading Agreement and General Terms and Conditions forming part of the
contract.
(We understand Mark Taylor to be concerned on this aspect.)

2.  Enron's Practice re EOL

Our understanding is that:

* Potential customers have been sent the password application under cover
of a letter from Joseph Hirl inviting them to complete the application.
Neither
the letter nor the application form indicate who is expected to sign the form.

* Completed applications are reviewed by Enron primarily from a credit
standpoint but also, we understand from Mark Taylor, to quickly confirm the
authority of the signer (by e.g. in the case of a U.S. counterparty, checking
if
the signatory shows the title "director" alongside his name).

* If satisfied, Enron then signs the acceptance part of the application
and issues a password.

* Four applications had been received regarding Japan as of 11am today and
none has yet been approved.

3.  Business Purposes

Article 43 of the Civil Code provides that a juristic person has rights and
obligations in accordance with law and the business purposes specified in its
constituent documents.  Where a corporation enters into a contract outside its
business purposes, the contract is prima facie void.

However, if the counterparty did not know that the contract was beyond the
power
of the corporation, and was not negligent in failing to know such fact, the
contract will be enforced under Article 110 of the Civil Code.

The most prudent practice would be for Enron to obtain a copy of the
counterparty's business purposes (certified by the Legal Affairs Bureau or by
a
representative director) and form a view on whether the proposed transaction
falls within those purposes.

However, since Japanese companies' business purposes, after listing a limited
number of specific purposes, generally include a final item along the lines of
"all incidental or ancillary business", it is common for companies to not make
this inquiry except in the most major contracts.

With respect to statutory corporations, however, care is required because
often
their business purposes are in fact limited.

Accordingly, a rule of thumb solution would be: if the counterparty name does
not contain "Kabushiki Kaisha" or "Yugen Gaisha" at the end of the name, to
make
further inquiries.

4.  Authority to Bind the Company - The Law

The position in Japan is similar to that in a number of other countries in the
sense that:

(a)  Deemed Authority

The law provides for a form of execution which, if followed, entitles a party
to
presume that the company is bound.  In Japan, this involves the execution of a
contract by the company's "representative director".  This corresponds to the
presumption concerning the affixing of the company seal in some states of the
US
and in the UK, and the execution of the contract by 2 directors in Australia.

It is possible for the powers of the representative director to be restricted
by
law or the constituent documents of the corporation. (Article 53 of the Civil
Code) but if the counterparty did not know of such restriction, the contract
is
still binding on the company.

(b)  Apparent Authority

In common, with other countries, Japan has a concept of apparent authority.
Article 262 of the Commercial Code provides:

 "A company shall be liable to a bona fide third party for any act done
by a director invested with any title such as president, vice president,
executive director or managing director from which it may be assumed that he
has
authority to represent the company, even in cases where the person has no
power
of representation."

Articles 37 and 38 of the Commercial Code extend the same concept to "general
managers" (so shihainin).  It is generally considered that Article 43 then
applies the concept to "an employee who has been entrusted with certain types
of
matters or specific matters."

Accordingly, in addition to persons having the titles listed in Article 262
(above), the general view is that persons having titles such as general
manager
and division manager (bucho), will be deemed to have the authority to
represent
the company for normal transactions within the particular areas of the
company's
business for which they are responsible.

It is also likely that section managers (kacho) or section chiefs (kakaricho)
have power to bind the company to a certain extent in areas for which they are
responsible.

(e)  Holding Out

Even if an employee of the company is acting outside his actual authority, if
the company has held the employee out as having authority, the company will be
bound by his/her action.

5.  Practical Considerations

In formulating an approach for Enron to take on the basis of the above law,
the
following factors are relevant:

(a)  Practice regarding Representative Director Seal

It is common for a counterparty to seek to take the advantage of the
presumption
referred to in 4(a) above by requiring the representative director's corporate
seal to be affixed (and, if contract is in English, for him to sign) or  to
insist on tracing the "chain of authority" of the signatory up to the
representative director (e.g. by power of attorney), for major or unusual
transactions.

(b)  Size of Transaction

The question is what transactions fall into the "major" or "unusual" category.

Unfortunately the cases on this do not allow a clear line to be drawn.  As in
many other countries, the answer depends on factors such as those noted in
(c),
(d) and (e) below, which vary company by company.

Accordingly, where the contract involves (or could involve) a considerable
ongoing exposure by the company, Japanese corporations would not be surprised
to
be asked for the signatory to be at a certain level, or for written
confirmation
of the signatory's authority to be obtained from a person at such level.

(c)  Size of Company

While it would be prudent and normal to insist upon the representative
director's seal being affixed to a contract of the present type in the case
of a
smaller company, it would not be normal practice to so insist in the case of a
major company such as a bank or major trading company counterparty, in which
companies lower level employees are presumed to have greater authority.

(d)  Business Department of Signatory

The counterparty is more likely to be bound under the apparent authority
doctrine if the signatory is in (and carries a title which refers to) the
relevant business department (e.g. energy), than if he is not.

(e)  Degree of Exposure

To the extent that the online products to be made available are likely to
expose
the counterparty to considerable liability, the possibility of a counterparty
in
the future disclaiming liability should not be discounted and would warrant a
reasonably conservative approach.

(f)  Recent History

However, even when faced with considerable losses during the recent economic
crisis, Japanese companies (at least major companies) have not generally
attempted to use lack of authority as a defense, presumably because of
reputation considerations.

(g) Identity of Addressee

The title of the person to whom the invitation letter is sent may be relevant.
For example, if it was sent to the General Manager of the relevant department,
but the application came from a section chief, there would be strong argument
that the company had held the section chief out as having the necessary
authority.

(h)  Internal Procedures

Since the law concerning execution by a representative director can be
considered to broadly correspond to the law concerning execution under seal in
some countries, and by two directors in for example Australia, the Japanese
rules are not out of line with those of other countries.

Accordingly, it should be necessary for Enron to take a more stringent
approach
to Japan in this respect than it does in marketing the same products in other
countries.  The procedures in place for other countries may be sufficient for
Japan as well, although some adjustment will need to be made for Japan's
unique
regime of company titles.

6.  Conservative Approach

If the online transactions are treated as a major or unusual transaction for
the
counter-party, under common practice Enron would require:

* The application to be executed under the registered seal of (and counter
signed by) a representative director, or by a person who is able to produce
documentation showing a line of authority originating with a representative
director.

* A certified copy of the seal register.

* A certified copy of the register of the company issued by the Legal
Affairs Bureau, to confirm the business purposes and the identity of the
representative director.

7.  Less Conservative Approach

Major Companies

For major Japanese trading companies, banks, insurance companies and other
companies of equivalent size, the following approach could be adopted which
would not be out of line with market practice:

* The application to be executed by a manager (or general manager)(bucho)
of the relevant department or above, or

* By a person able to establish a line of authority from such party.

A more aggressive approach would involve accepting applications signed by a
person at the level of section manager (kacho) or section chief (kakaricho),
but
this is right "on the line" and we would prefer Enron to do so only if there
is
some history of dealings with the company or other evidence to back up an
apparent authority argument.

Smaller Companies

For other companies the approach would be as set out in 6. above.

Perhaps your credit control procedures could be used to set a benchmark for
dividing between small and large companies.

8.  Likely Response of Target  Companies

Your marketing experts will be in a better position than us to form a view
but,
taking into account Japanese commercial practice, we do not believe any
company
is likely to be offended if Enron responds along the above lines to an
application signed by a person who does not meet the above suggested approach,
particularly taking into account that the approach is not inconsistent with
the
correspondence and application form the companies have been sent and no
applications have yet been approved.

Regards

Paul Davis/Hideo Ohta

__________________________________
Baker & McKenzie Advice of 15 March 2000

Dear Mark:

I refer to you e-mail of March 3 sent to my partner, Paul Davis.  I am in
charge
of our Information Technology/E-Commerce Dept.  Please accept my apology for
not
having responded earlier.

Please see our comments below.

Should you have any questions, please let us know.

Best regards,
Yasuyoshi Goto

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Taylor [mailto:Mark.Taylor@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 9:17 AM
> To: Paul.TYO.Davis@BakerNet.com
> Cc: Alan Aronowitz
> Subject: EnronOnline in Japan
>
>
>
>
> Dear Paul:
>
> I believe Alan Aronowitz and Mark Haedicke of our office met
> with you a week or
> so ago and mentioned that we would need advice from you
> regarding the use of our
> internet trading website with customers in Japan.  Below is a
> list of initial
> questions regarding which we would be grateful for the
> benefit of your advice.
> For your background information as you consider these
> questions, be advised that
> counterparties must sign a written "Password Application"
> which provides that
> the counterparty intends to be bound by agreements entered
> into by "clicking" in
> the appropriate spaces on the website.  Please feel free to
> contact me with any
> questions you may have.  I can be reached either by e-mail at
> Mark.Taylor@enron.com or by telephone at (713)853-7459.
>
> 1.   Have relevant regulators in your jurisdiction made any
> statements regarding
> marketing of or dealing in any of the following types of
> products through the
> internet or other electronic systems:
>
>      Commodity transactions relating to oil, gas, electricity
> or other energy
> commodities, whether derivative
>           transactions (cash settled) or physically settled.
>      Financial derivatives - i.e. interest rate, foreign
> exchange or credit
> derivatives.
>      Weather derivatives.
>      If so, please could you provide us with a brief summary.

Our research has revealed no statements of regulators in Japan in connection
with the marketing or dealing in the above types of  products through the
internet or other electronic systems from publicly available source.  We will
let you know if we find any previous or future statements.

>
> 2.   Do any specific laws or regulations exist in your
> jurisdiction which would
> prevent or in any way impact upon marketing or trading of any
> of the products
> set out in question 1 above through the internet?  In
> answering this question
> please address issues relating to contractual formation and
> enforceability of
> contracts entered into via the internet.  In particular, if a
> transaction
> entered into via the internet is enforceable under U.S. or
> U.K. law and the
> transactions contain a choice of such law, will such
> transactions, including the
> choice of law, be enforceable in Japan?

We do not have any specific laws or regulations which would marketing or
trading
of any of the products set out in question 1 above through the internet.
Under
Japanese law, formation of any contract does not require any formality.

Japanese law generally does not require any formalities for offers or
acceptances to be valid as such. There is no Statute of Frauds, and parties
may
make most types of contracts orally. If there is enough evidence establishing
that the offeree agreed to the terms offered, an offeror may rely on it. In
most
simple sales contracts for consumer goods, for example, it would be easy to
prove that the customer agreed to pay x yen for product Y. The Seller's
electronic records showing that the customer clicked on the icon to buy
product
Y should be enough in this context.

In more complicated contracts, the structure of the seller's Web pages should
be
carefully designed. Having no court decisions, we have no definite answer to
the
question of enforceability of shrink-wrap agreements in Japan. However, the
legal implications of the Web-wrap, the online version of shrink-wrap, may be
somewhat different from shrink-wraps (e.g. licenses for software sold over the
counter).  Under a typical shrink-wrap license in the real world, for example,
the customer cannot break the wrapper until after the customer purchases the
product. However, in an on-line environment, a customer has a choice to click
on
an Accept-to-Buy icon before the customer purchases the product. Further,
with a
carefully compiled sequence of screens or pages which would in effect be able
to
let the customer read the terms and conditions before rushing to click on the
icon, it would be easier to prove that the customer read the terms and
conditions than in a typical shrink-wrap license situation. Unlike shrink-wrap
in the real world, the seller may obtain an electronic record showing that the
customer clicked on the icon. Given these differences, the result possibly may
be more favorable to sellers online than to those using shrink-wrap licenses.

If a transaction entered into via the internet is enforceable under U.S. or
U.K.
law and the transactions contain a choice of such law, such transactions,
including the choice of law, will be enforceable in Japan.

>
> 3.   If the answer to either of question 1 or 2 is "yes",
> please indicate
> whether the impact of any relevant statements, laws or
> regulations will differ
> depending upon whether (a) the relevant internet site is
> maintained in your
> jurisdiction or elsewhere; or (b) the party effecting the
> marketing/trading
> through the internet is locally licensed.

N/A

> 4.   Please confirm that by marketing to or trading with
> counterparts in your
> jurisdiction via the internet local relevant regulatory
> bodies/local laws or
> regulations will not consider the party maintaining the
> relevant website to have
> established a physical establishment/branch in your jurisdiction.

We do not have any clear cut answer to this since we have no relevant laws,
regulations, or court cases.  So long as  the party maintains the relevant
website with a computer server located outside Japan, the likelihood of
Japanese
regulatory bodies to consider that the party maintaining such website
established a "physical" establishment/branch in Japan is negligible.

>
> Thank you in advance for your attention.  We look forward to
> hearing from you.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mark Taylor
>
>

***********************************************************
This is an e-mail from Baker & McKenzie - Tokyo Aoyama Law Office (Qualified
Joint Enterprise Offices). The contents of this e-mail may be privileged and
confidential and are intended only for the use of the addressee. No one else
may
copy, forward, disclose or use all or any of it in any form.

If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply
e-mail) and delete this e-mail from your system.

Thank you.


Thank you for subscribing to the Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air Web
Specials Announcement Service.

Web Specials are a great way to save on flights with Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air.  Web Specials can only be purchased online through the Alaska
Airlines/Horizon Air Web Site.

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air offer Web Specials for travel originating
Thursday, 1/04/01 or Saturday, 1/06/01, and returning Saturday, 1/06/01
or Monday, 1/08/01 or Tuesday, 1/09/01.

Hurry, seats are limited, prices and markets subject to change.

The current specials are shown below (all fares quoted in US dollars)
without airport fees and segment tax:

Roundtrip Coach fares for travel between:

Anchorage, AK       -   Cordova, AK       $139.00
Anchorage, AK       -   Sitka, AK         $239.00
Boise, ID           -   Lewiston, ID      $ 59.00
Boise, ID           -   San Jose, CA      $ 99.00
Burbank, CA         -   Juneau, AK        $299.00
Burbank, CA         -   Portland, OR      $189.00
Cordova, AK         -   Anchorage, AK     $139.00
Eugene, OR          -   Los Angeles, CA   $219.00
Eugene, OR          -   Portland, OR      $ 59.00
Fresno, CA          -   Seattle, WA       $149.00
Juneau, AK          -   Burbank, CA       $299.00
Juneau, AK          -   Ketchikan, AK     $119.00
Juneau, AK          -   Wenatchee, WA     $239.00
Ketchikan, AK       -   Juneau, AK        $119.00
Lewiston, ID        -   Boise, ID         $ 59.00
Los Angeles, CA     -   Eugene, OR        $219.00
Los Angeles, CA     -   Spokane, WA       $209.00
Oakland, CA         -   Portland, OR      $109.00
Ontario, CA         -   Wenatchee, WA     $209.00
Pasco, WA           -   Portland, OR      $ 59.00
Phoenix, AZ         -   Seattle, WA       $199.00
Portland, OR        -   Burbank, CA       $189.00
Portland, OR        -   Eugene, OR        $ 59.00
Portland, OR        -   Oakland, CA       $109.00
Portland, OR        -   Pasco, WA         $ 59.00
Portland, OR        -   Sacramento, CA    $ 70.00
Portland, OR        -   San Diego, CA     $189.00
Portland, OR        -   Spokane, WA       $ 60.00
Sacramento, CA      -   Portland, OR      $ 70.00
Sacramento, CA      -   Wenatchee, WA     $119.00
San Diego, CA       -   Portland, OR      $189.00
San Diego, CA       -   Wenatchee, WA     $209.00
San Francisco, CA   -   Seattle, WA       $119.00
San Francisco, CA   -   Wenatchee, WA     $119.00
San Jose, CA        -   Boise, ID         $ 99.00
Seattle, WA         -   Fresno, CA        $149.00
Seattle, WA         -   Phoenix, AZ       $199.00
Seattle, WA         -   San Francisco, CA $119.00
Seattle, WA         -   Wenatchee, WA     $ 59.00
Sitka, AK           -   Anchorage, AK     $239.00
Spokane, WA         -   Los Angeles, CA   $209.00
Spokane, WA         -   Portland, OR      $ 60.00
Spokane, WA         -   Tucson, AZ        $219.00
Tucson, AZ          -   Spokane, WA       $219.00
Wenatchee, WA       -   Juneau, AK        $239.00
Wenatchee, WA       -   Ontario, CA       $209.00
Wenatchee, WA       -   Sacramento, CA    $119.00
Wenatchee, WA       -   San Diego, CA     $209.00
Wenatchee, WA       -   San Francisco, CA $119.00
Wenatchee, WA       -   Seattle, WA       $ 59.00

Additional markets are available at
http://shopping.alaskaair.com/webspecials/start.asp. Check the Alaska Web
Specials page periodically as additional markets and dates may be added.

Web Special details:
Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only.
Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates.
Offer is for a very limited time and is subject to change without notice.
Valid on new bookings only.
Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets
require immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made.
Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services.
Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the
last date of your planned travel.
Fares quoted do not include Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $12 or
segment fees of $2.50 per flight segment. A flight segment is defined as
one takeoff and one landing.
Other restrictions apply.

For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit
the Hilton Web site at:
http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html

You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service.

While we,d be pleased to continue to tell you about our great products and
prices, you can unsubscribe to our Email Notification Service by visiting
our Web site at:
http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp

Please do not respond to this message.  Mail sent to this address cannot
be answered.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude66.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas66.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil66.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded66.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG66.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG66.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL66.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Enron is forming a new organization - - the Enron Xcelerator - - to drive the
formation and development of new businesses at Enron.  Enron's unique ability
to start and develop new businesses has driven most of our growth over the
years.  Lou L. Pai, currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Energy Services, will
lead the Xcelerator.  Over his years at Enron, Lou has been key to the
creation and rapid growth of our wholesale gas, wholesale power and energy
service businesses.  The existing business units will continue their
development of core businesses, while the Xcelerator will be responsible for
developing new business opportunities that are natural extensions of Enron's
business model and core skills, but not currently under development elsewhere
in Enron.

Dave Delainey, currently President and CEO of Enron Americas, will become
Chairman and CEO of Enron Energy Services.  Dave brings a wealth of
experience and accomplishment from Enron Wholesale Services' businesses where
he led the growth of our Canadian business and our North American origination
activity and, most recently, had a great year in Enron Americas.

Dave is forming an Office of the Chairman in EES.  Joining Dave in the Office
of the Chairman are Dan Leff, President of EES, Global Energy Services, and
Marty Sunde, President of EES, Global Marketing and Services.  Dan and Marty
have been instrumental in the development and execution of the successful EES
business model.  Also joining the Office of the Chairman of EES is Janet
Dietrich as Chief Operating Officer.  Janet, currently is Managing Director
in Enron Americas, where she has been successful in many of Enron Wholesale's
core businesses, including gas trading, risk management and structural
origination.  Tom White will continue as Vice Chairman of EES and will focus
on the development and expansion of EES' customer relationships.  Lou, Tom,
Dan, Marty and the entire EES organization have developed a great business
model with great growth prospects.  EES has become an essential part of
Enron's market valuation and growth story.  This new leadership structure
will enable EES to continue on its path of sustained growth and increasing
profitability.

John Lavorato will succeed Dave as President and CEO of Enron Americas.  John
has been an essential part of Enron's energy trading success over the years
and is a key part of Enron Wholesale Services' continuing success story.
Joining John is Louise Kitchen, currently President and CEO of Enron
NetWorks.  Louise, who accelerated Enron's outstanding growth with the
deployment of EnronOnline, will take over as Chief Operating Officer of Enron
Americas.

Philippe Bibi, currently Chief Operating Officer of Enron NetWorks will take
over as President and CEO of Enron NetWorks.  Under Philippe's leadership,
Enron has become a technology leader and the leading e-commerce company.
Joining Philippe as Chief Operating Officer is Greg Piper, currently Managing
Director of Enron NetWorks.  Greg currently leads Enron NetWork's origination
activity and was responsible for the creation and deployment of ClickPaper,
Enron's successful online pulp and paper marketplace.

Please join us in congratulating all of these individuals on their
achievements and their new responsibilities.


Woody

Did this include any ICAP ? Do we have any idea of who is bidding that one ? I think we need to frame a reverse RFP on this one to see if we could get some-one to buy 4.50$ without the congestion.

Harry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wood, George
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:21 PM
To:	Arora, Harry; Stalford, Robert; Davis, Mark Dana; Broderick, Paul J.; Llodra, John; Lewis, Barry; Herrera, Fernando
Subject:	PPL Tolling with Wallingford - we were not shortlisted
Importance:	High

Here is the feedback ....

they got 12 responses and shortlisted four
We were number 10 or 11 on the list  (our fixed was 3.75, with 1.50 floating and $500 per unit start charge for 5 yrs, 3 - GE LM 6000)
winning bid was over $5 - I am guessing around $5.50
they think their congestion premium should be around $1

hope to get more information in the near future

thanks

Woody


I would drop the second sentence (it's a bit convoluted).  I would also like
to look at what else the ad says -- ie how are the quotes introduced, what
other quotes will be used, etc.

	Jeffrey Keeler
	10/30/2000 09:54 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Pew Center ad - Ken Lay Quote

Steve:

The Pew Center on Climate Change is planning an advertisement to run in a
special supplement to the Washington Post and International Herald Tribune
around the time of COP 6 climate treaty meetings in the Hague in November,
and they would like to include a quote from Ken Lay.   A similar quote was
included a Pew Washington Post ad that ran in April 2000.

I've revised it a bit to read:   "Enron supports market-based initiatives
that create efficient, cost-effective and environmentally sound energy
systems.  As a company, we use our global networks to provide innovative
solutions that help the world meet its energy needs while reducing greenhouse
gas emissions."

Unfortunately, they have given me very short notice and would like an answer
by COB today.   If you could let me know sometime today if this is OK to run,
I'd appreciate it.

Thanks,

Jeff

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
1775 Eye Street, N.W.  Suite 800
Washington, D.C.  20006
(202) 466-9157 phone
(202) 331-4717 fax
(800) 502-6856 pager


HERE ARE THE PICKS FOR ROUND 2:

Tom:   Pittsburgh
Guzman: Pittsburgh
Steve:  Pittsburgh
Broker:  Pittsburgh
Holden:  Buffalo

It could be over after this round!


any preference?

-----Original Message-----
From: Proctor, Shemin V. [mailto:sproctor@akllp.com]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:44 AM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: Centana Letter Agreement.DOC

Let's plan on 4pm. My office is 3801 or I can walk over to you,
whichever you prefer.
Shemin V. Proctor


Both positions are currently located in Emeryville and will be moving to
the new Dublin campus next year.

If you are interested, please email your resume to gtow@sybase.com

Director, Global Systems Integrator Alliance

RESPONSIBILITIES:

Execute a channel strategy to engage global systems integrators across
Sybase's value chain.
Promote and track sales to systems integrators such as Accenture, KPMG,
PwC, etc.
Drive programs enabling two or more Big Five consulting firms to sell and
deliver Sybase technology and applications solutions.
Scope value added initiatives in sales, training and marketing, identify
action steps and establish responsibilities and accountabilities for Sybase
and the partner to achieve initiative success.
Act as part of a select team representing Sybase Divisions' needs and
business structure and work with Sybase Divisions to create and implement
new processes which drive operational efficiencies.
Work with headquarter and Division teams to drive partner influenced
license sales for Sybase solution plays.

QUALIFICATIONS:

5-10 yrs business experience with strong operations or major Consulting
Firm background, MBA required.
Understanding of technology, process and organization issues required to
implement significant technology and applications solutions.
Political savvy and executive presence to work with high level Partner and
Sybase management.
Understanding of how Big Five Consulting firms are organized and motivated.
Must be able to translate and represent Sybase value to partners.
Experience leading large teams towards common goals, completing PROGRAM
milestones, keeping senior management and virtual team members informed on
progress, recommending program improvements, and communicating program
success and risks.
Strong program management skills, including attention to detail, ability to
develop partner programs, post actions for organization awareness and drive
delivery dates and actions.
Leadership skills to manage large virtual teams, internal and Partner
based, through the completion of a project.

Director, Partner Operations

RESPONSIBILITIES:

Responsible for developing and tracking account plans for each of the
Strategic partners identified by Corporate Development.
This includes Global System Integrators, Global Independent Software
Vendors, and Global Hardware/Software Platform providers.
Become the single point of contact across the partners, divisions, and the
field sales force on day-to-day operational issues.

Major Duties:
Establish a Go-To-Market model for each engagement
Facilitate integration of partner with division and geographic sales force
Negotiate appropriate global contracts
Track opportunities and resulting revenue
Ensure training and joint marketing occur per the contracts
Resolve day-to-day operational issues

QUALIFICATIONS:
BS/BA & 12+ years or MBA & 11+ years
Strong business development and channel management skills required.
Excellent negotiation, organization, presentation, and communication
skills.

About Sybase, Inc.
Sybase, Inc., is a leading provider of enterprise-class software solutions
that fuel e-Business and enable access to
information anytime, anyplace. As the global expert in the heavy-lifting
infrastructure, Sybase offers what companies
and organizations need in order to do business on the Web. Sybase has been
offering powerful, innovative software
solutions and expertise for more than 16-years.

With its industry-leading Enterprise Portal, mobile and wireless and vertical
market solutions, Sybase is one of the
largest global independent software companies in the world. The company has
an open e-Business platform that
integrates customers' existing systems and gets their businesses on the Web
faster and at less cost than the
competition. Sybase's platform can also go wireless because the company's
subsidiary, iAnywhere Solutions, extends
the platform to mobile and wireless devices.


Good news for Body Shop members! The Body Shop will reopen Monday, January 7, 2002. While we recognize that the Body Shop is a tremendous asset to all of our employees' health and wellness, we must reopen it without an Enron subsidy. Therefore, the membership fee will increase from $25 to $30 per month for all Enron employees and contractors. Spouse memberships will remain at $15 per month. Locker fees will remain at $10 per month and members may keep their current locker. (If you emptied your locker after the Body Shop closed in December, please notify the Body Shop reception desk that you would like to reoccupy it.)
The overall price increase, coupled with reduced expenses, will enable the Body Shop to reopen and remain open on a cash-neutral basis to meet creditors' requirements. Payroll deductions will be reactivated with the January 15th payroll and will include the increased fee. If you do not wish to continue your membership, please contact the Body Shop to cancel your membership via email only at <mailto:Body.Shop@enron.com>.  Membership information and enrollment forms can be accessed below:

The Body Shop's new hours will be 6:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and 6:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. on Friday. Saturday hours are not offered at this time.
Although laundry service has been discontinued, towels will continue to be available for your convenience. Once the ongoing membership base and associated revenues have been stabilized to support staffing and housekeeping, exercise classes will be scheduled. We anticipate exercise classes to be available within a few weeks. Massage therapy services will continue and are available by appointment by calling extension 3-3047.
Whether you are a continuing member or considering new membership, there is no better time for you to take advantage of the Body Shop and to take care of your personal health and well being than right now, at the beginning of 2002.
Your continued support is greatly appreciated.


I am on vacation during the week of Oct. 9.  Sara

	Brent Hendry@ENRON
	09/13/2000 04:28 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Vacation etc.

I will be coming into the office late tomorrow morning, I will be waiting for
a second phone line to be installed.  I will be working on some weather deals
from home.  I will be available at my home number if anyone needs to reach
me.  My number is 281 866 8797, my cell number is 832 368 3286.

I would like to take the following Wednesdays as vacation days if it does not
cause a conflict in staffing:  September 27, October 11, October 25 and
November 8.   I would also like to take December 27 through 29 as vacation
days.  Please let me know if this will be problem.


Please read the message below.  What do you think about increasing the fee?

D
--------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 07:32
AM ---------------------------

John Griffith@ENRON
09/19/2000 11:28 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cornhusker

Darren,

How are things going?  Just a note to reiterate what we talked about
yesterday.  Rick Hill wanted to know what the admin fee would be if the fee
was for an outside counterparty.  This admin fee would be for the life of the
project (through 2019).   Also, Mike Mazowita should be calling you to talk
about the plant being down this week through the end of the month.  Please
let me know if you have any questions or concerns.  Thanks.

John


Tana -

Please see the below NDA request.

This is in relation to the Letter of Interest I put in your box this am.
Basically, ENW is going to team with a consulting company to provide a
pipeline portfolio management solution to CMS Panhandle Pipeline Companies.
This proposal will involve some work with ETS and, therefore, both groups
want to be covered under one NDA.  It needs to be bilateral as CMS will be
disclosing information to us also.

I will get particulars from Stephen about CMS and have you copied on the
information.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 03/30/2001 08:54 AM -----

	Stephen Abbanat/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/29/2001 02:22 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Stephen Abbanat/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: CMS NDA

Mark,

Thanks for agreeing to help prepare this NDA.  As we discussed on the phone,
our team is now in a position to begin detailed negotiations with CMS for a
systems solution project (CMS Energy - Panhandle Pipe Line Companies).  As a
part of the negotiations we will need to disclose some detailed information
about ETS systems.

Steve Hotte (CIO of ETS) and our team agreed that we should to execute an NDA
that covers both ENW and ETS and gave me Drew's name as their legal council.

The contact name at CMS should be:

Cynthia C. Albert
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Information Systems
5444 Westheimer Road
Houston, TX 77210-4967

713-989-7334
tsmehta@cmsenergy.com

On the Enron side, I would use

David Berberian for ENW
Steve Hotte for ETS

for signatories.

I hope this is sufficient information to prepare one or two NDA's whichever
is appropriate.

Sincerely,
Steve Abbanat


In the attached article, there is reference to the state taking control of
some Utility transmission asset as a quid pro quo for bailing out the
Utilities  (Senate President Pro Tem John Burton (D-San Francisco), who
argues that California should take control of the transmission grid).  While
our understanding of the current politics is that many politicians don't want
that trade, it is not out of the question.

Having the state take over transmission would make all transmission
non-jurisdictional to FERC within California.

Given that the State really wants "something", does anyone have any ideas as
to what these companies may have as a viable trade?   One thought - I
remember reading that PG&E NEG had taken out an option on 20,000 MW of
turbines last year.  Maybe the state could require PG&E NEG to sell (implicit
deal) these turbines at cost to anyone siting in CA?

I'd appreciate any other thoughts that people have.  Not sure where this
issue goes over time, but we need to help the politicians come up with a
better answer than the transmission plant.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 04:18 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/06/2001 03:32 PM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: La times on California

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 03:30 PM -----

	David Parquet@ECT
	02/06/2001 02:40 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: La times

Long article...Mentions Calpine offering 1000 MW at slightly higher than 5.5
cents/kwh.

----- Forwarded by David Parquet/SF/ECT on 02/06/2001 12:37 PM -----

	"Cole Frates" <cfrates@azurix.com>
	02/06/2001 12:24 PM
	Please respond to cfrates

		 To: <dparque@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: La times

Tuesday, February 6, 2001 |  </cgi-bin/print.cgi> Print this story
</cgi-bin/print.cgi>

Davis Vows Plan for Edison, PG&E

 The governor says that by the end of the week he will have a strategy to
help the utilities avoid bankruptcy.

By DAN MORAIN and NANCY RIVERA BROOKS, Times Staff Writers

SACRAMENTO--Gov. Gray Davis said Monday he and legislative leaders would
have a plan by week's end to avert the bankruptcy of the state's two
biggest
utilities by trading ratepayer-backed bond money for utility assets.
"The drop-dead date is clearly Feb. 12," Davis said. That is when a federal
judge is set to hear a lawsuit by Southern California Edison, joined by
Pacific Gas & Electric, that could lead to sharp rate hikes for consumers
unless a rescue plan is in place.
Momentum has been building for a plan in which the state would get control
of the utility transmission lines in return for issuing bonds to give the
utilities a cash infusion.
But Senate President Pro Tem John Burton (D-San Francisco), who argues that
California should take control of the transmission grid, said he did not
share Davis' urgency to cut a deal this week.
The wrangling comes as the state faces the end early Wednesday of what
likely is the last federal emergency order requiring that independent power
generators sell electricity in California. The Bush administration insists
it will not extend the order.
"We're not even asking," Davis spokesman Steven Maviglio said.
Several such orders issued in the past two months have forced power
generators to keep electricity flowing to California, even though Edison
and
PG&E were unable to pay the skyrocketing wholesale costs of electricity.
But the federal emergency orders are less vital now that California has
relieved the utilities of having to buy power--at a cost to taxpayers of
roughly $45 million a day.
Davis, meanwhile, plans to announce today that California has entered into
its first long-term contracts to buy power from independent generators,
thereby beginning its shift away from the reliance on spot markets.
At least one firm, Calpine Corp., was on the verge late Monday of signing a
deal to provide the state with up to 1,000 megawatts for roughly 10 years.
One megawatt is enough to serve roughly 1,000 homes. The cost could not be
determined, but it is believed to be slightly above the 5.5 cents per
kilowatt-hour that Davis had hoped for.
"Clearly, we are no longer waiting for someone else to solve our problem or
do something to bail us out," Davis said at a Capitol news conference
Monday.
"We are doing everything within our power as a state to right this ship.
We're not waiting for someone to throw us a long pass. We're going to solve
it ourselves."
Davis said he will confer with Democratic and Republican legislative
leaders
this week to resolve the complex and controversial issue of providing "a
cash infusion to the utilities so they can be viable," in exchange for
utility assets.
The Democratic governor said he is not sure how the state will help the
financially hobbled companies. It may sell bonds, or guarantee bonds that
the utilities might sell.
Either way, the bonds would give the utilities cash to help them pay down
their debt, estimated at between $6 billion and $12 billion.
"It cannot be done without assistance from the state," Davis said.
Though Burton favors taking over the transmission grid, Davis supports
taking equity stakes in the companies themselves in the form of warrants,
similar to stock options. The warrants could be cashed in after the
utilities regain their stability and used to lower the cost of electricity
for consumers, or to soften future rate hikes.
"That state assistance, no matter what form it comes in, has a value,"
Davis
said. "It is my goal to make sure that whatever the state receives in
return
has comparable value."
Davis signed legislation last week allowing the state to sell an estimated
$10 billion worth of bonds to buy power in the future. The bonds would be
purchased by investors, who would be repaid over time by the ratepayers.
By selling bonds, the state in essence will be subsidizing consumers for
the
high prices of electricity in the first year or two. But consumers will pay
higher prices in later years when the cost of electricity is likely to drop
as more power plants are built.
In addition to selling bonds to pay for power in the future, Davis said,
the
state likely will sell bonds to help the utilities defray the past cost of
power.
State Treasurer Phil Angelides, who will oversee the bond process, said in
an interview that the state had little choice but to sell bonds for future
power purchases. But he said resolving the "past debts of the utilities" is
a tougher problem.
"There is no magic money here. Bonds require a repayment source," Angelides
said. "It needs to be a buyout versus a bailout."
The Democratic treasurer said that only after coming up with their own
reorganization plan should the utilities seek state assistance.
"At the end of the day, if there are some assets of value that we are
interested in as a buyer . . . that should be on the table."
Edison and PG&E have run up billions in debt in recent months as they paid
record high prices for wholesale power, yet were unable to pass on the full
cost of it to consumers.
On Monday, a federal judge in Los Angeles is scheduled to rule on Edison's
suit alleging that the California Public Utilities Commission must allow
the
utilities to pass on the multibillion-dollar cost of buying power.
Assemblyman Fred Keeley (D-Boulder Creek), among the lawmakers most
involved
in the Legislature's response to the energy crisis, said that if utilities
win the suit and are allowed to pass on the full cost of their power
purchases, consumers could be hit with an 86% rate increase.
"I don't think we can roll the dice and let that happen," said Keeley, who
along with Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg (D-Sherman Oaks) has been pushing
for an early settlement of the Edison lawsuit.
However, Burton, the Legislature's most influential member, shrugged off
the
Monday deadline.
"Trial courts rule. Appellate courts rule. Supreme Courts rule, and it's
three or four years down the road," Burton said.
In other developments Monday:
* Davis again used his emergency authority to claim $150 million worth of
contracts held by PG&E, shortly before they would have been taken by one of
the utility's creditors.
PG&E had defaulted on payments to the California Power Exchange, and the
entity, a sort of commodities market for electricity, wanted to auction off
the contracts. Davis took similar action with Edison contracts Friday.
The PG&E contracts will supply between 100 and 500 megawatts of electricity
for the remainder of 2001. The price of the power will be determined in
proceedings before the state Board of Control. But the state may find
itself
paying significantly more than the relative low prices specified in the
contracts.
* Edison revealed that one of its bank accounts was seized last month by a
creditor, General ReFinancial Products Corp., which contends it is owed
$8.8
million for early termination of a financial arrangement during the
utility's debt crisis.
Edison said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
that it has asked the federal court that gave the creditor permission to
attach the account to reverse course and stop the action. The account, with
a New York bank, contains $1.5 million, Edison said.
Edison noted in the same filing that it had $1.36 billion in cash on
Monday,
but has defaulted on several million dollars' worth of debt payments and
has
"deferred" payments totaling $743 million through Monday to electricity
suppliers.
If the Rosemead utility had made all of its debt and electricity payments
as
they came due, it would have run out of cash last Friday, Edison said. In
contrast, its parent company, Edison International is paying all of its
bills.
* Shares of Edison International rose 22 cents to close at $13.23 per share
Monday and PG&E Corp. fell 14 cents to close at $13.60 per share. Both
trade
on the New York Stock Exchange.
Standard & Poor's, a large credit rating agency, reaffirmed that
California's strong rating remains on its "Credit Watch Negative" list
following Thursday's passage by the Legislature of a bill giving the state
Department of Water Resources $500 million more to buy electricity for the
state.
California's general obligation bonds carry a rating of double-A.
* S&P also downgraded to "D"--or junk-bond level--the "issuer credit
rating"
of the California Independent System Operator, reflecting the fact that the
utilities are no longer paying their electricity bills.
The downgrade does not affect any operating funds of Cal-ISO, which are
generated by transmission fees, and does not include debt issued by the
state for Cal-ISO, which retains "insured triple-A" and "A-1 plus" ratings.

(See attached file: Picture)
(See attached file: Picture)
(See attached file: Picture)
(See attached file: Picture)
(See attached file: Picture)
 - Picture
 - Picture
 - Picture
 - Picture
 - Picture


----- Forwarded by Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron on 02/08/2001 05:20 PM -----

	Ricardo Charvel
	02/08/2001 05:14 PM

		 To: Mario Max Yzaguirre
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Max,

Attached you will find a copy of the briefing document that Steve Kean and
Rick Shapiro asked me to prepare for Mr. Lay.  As you requested, I have kept
the information on commercial issues to projects which have been closed.

As you will see, the document is focused on policy and regulation.  I am
concerned about Mr. Lay having enough information on energy imports since it
is one of the points that the Secretary may touch upon.  If you consider it
appropriate, maybe you could inform Mr. Lay on this matter.

I sincerely regret that you feel that there is a misalignment of commercial
and regulatory interests.  Hopefully when deregulation happens and business
grows the perception of this misalignment will disappear.

I agree with you that communication has not been optimal in the last months.
As you have been concentrated on the Vitro deal, I myself was very involved
with the transition team.  I will be flying to Monterrey once a week to see
you so that we can share information on our meetings with different
government authorities as well as the commercial information that you think
is relevant for me.

Best,

Ricardo


Let's talk to Matt about the forecast sheets for Socal and PG&E.  He needs to
work on the TW sheet as well.   Also, I would like him to create a sheet on
pipeline expansions and their rates and then tie in the daily curves for the
desk to use.

Mike


You might want to attend this meeting if you can.  We did some brainstorming
today on what / how a Commodity Logic payment module should be and came up
with some options that are quite revolutionary.  It entails some risk, but
also has revenue potential as well.  We want to run it by both you and Tom to
see if this is a direction you want to head.

If you're not available, then I can spend time with you to give you the
overview.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
02:09 PM ---------------------------
From: Maria Sandoval on 11/22/2000 01:27 PM
To: Kristin Cantu/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brenda Flores-Cuellar/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Payment Module Mtg. on 11/28

The above mentioned meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, November 28th
from 9 - 10 a.m. in EB 21c1.

If I have access to your calendar, this has already been added.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at ext. 35586.

Thank you.


Sherrie, good question!!  I called the chairman's office and it is publicly
held on the NYSE as "itwo".

Rosie

"Sherrie Gibson" <sherrie@layfam.com> on 07/16/2000 07:24:50 PM
Please respond to "Sherrie Gibson" <sherrie@layfam.com>
To: <Kenneth.Lay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: i2 Technologies, Inc.

Rosie,

Do you know if this company is privately or publicly held?  Please advise
me.  Thanks for keeping me informed.

Sherrie

----- Original Message -----
From: <Kenneth.Lay@enron.com>
To: <sherrie@layfam.com>; <Sally.Keepers@enron.com>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 2:17 PM
Subject: i2 Technologies, Inc.

> Hi Sherrie and Sally -
>
> To let you know that Ken has agreed to join another board.  It is i2
> Technologies, Inc.  The company is based in Dallas.
>
> Please let me know if you need further information.
>
> Rosie
>


Please put Steve Marland's Cell number in my Address Book.
-----Original Message-----
From: Herndon, Rogers
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Cc: Sturm, Fletcher J.
Subject: Steve Marland

Kevin -

Just an FYI - Steve Marland resigned from Reliant very recently.  Steve had been trading their term Midwest book and has previously covered the SE I believe.  I think Steve is a good trader, played the regional/time spreads very effectively, and is not afraid to put size on when appropriate.  I just think that Reliant's management team is "old school" and Steve was not being able to effectuate the changes he saw necessary (apparently, they would not even let him trade NG against his positions).

Steve just wanted to clear his head and get away.  He is looking at the opportunities everyone else is at the moment and is not in a rush.  I know he wants to work with a bright group that thinks the way he does.  I have told him that he should talk to you guys.  You may want to contact him directly when you have the green light to look outside ENE.  I have known Steve for awhile and think he could be a good fit - I think Fletch has met him and dealt with him in the markets as well.

Steve's cell number is 713-962-0274.  I know he would like to talk to UBS.

RH


Attached are the preliminary Corporate assessments for 2002.  They do not include EPSC charges.  Actual EPSC charges are billed directly to individual cost centers incurring the expenses.   For information on EPSC charges, contact Billie Akhave.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Dawn Derr
37775


Happy holidays from costco.com!

We're pleased to offer our members an exciting selection
of special offers to celebrate the season. Click here to view:
http://www.costco.com/landing.asp?landSrc=email&campaign=3

If you do not wish to receive these exciting offers in the future,
please follow the unsubscibe instructions below.

============================================================
+++   COSTCO.COM SPECIAL OFFERS INCLUDE:   +++
============================================================

+ Sharp 7" Portable DVD/CD Player [# 408624]
$499.99 - $50 Rebate = $449.99 (plus shipping & handling)

+ Sony DVD/CD Player [# 399868]
$169.99 (plus shipping & handling)

+ Dr. Suess' "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" on DVD [# 407418]
$18.49 (plus shipping & handling)

+ Rogar Estate Wine Opener [# 96842]
$64.99 (plus shipping & handling)

TO VIEW OTHER SPECIAL OFFERS, CLICK HERE:
============================================================
http://www.costco.com/landing.asp?landSrc=email&campaign=3
============================================================

If you cannot click on the URL within this message, please
copy and paste it into your browser.

When you submitted your rebate form, you provided Costco with your email
address. Occasionally, you will receive brief announcements regarding
new items and services. If you choose not to receive these
announcements, please
FORWARD this message to unsubscribe@mail.costco.com with "unsubscribe"
in the subject header. Please do not click REPLY.

Product prices and availability are subject to change without notice. If
a link takes you to the costco.com homepage instead of the specific
product page, that product may no longer be available.

* Instant coupon is a manufacturer's coupon, which will automatically be
applied at checkout.

If you need assistance, please e-mail us at customerservice@costco.com.

Costco Wholesale, Customer Service, P.O. Box 34535,
Seattle, WA.98124-1535


Attached are the high tech slides with the correct figure for dollars that
the high tech sector spent on electricity in 1999.

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/04/2000 09:39 AM -----


Susan,

I am out of the office today.  I willl have an answer for you first thing in
the morning.

Stacy


We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated 2/13/01 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be distributed to Legal
and Credit.


Mark/Bryan,

I've attached a file for your use in preparing for the launch of credit
derivatives on EnronOnline next week. It is substantially the same list that
was sent earlier for the launch of the EnronCredit.com site, minus the
companies which have already been discussed and removed. It also includes
those we have approved from a credit standpoint the last few days, namely
British Airways plc and National Westminster Bank plc.

I am copying our legal staff on both sides of the pond to ensure we are all
comfortable with these entities as reference credits for Online. Please
respond if there are objections to any name listed so that RAC-Credit can
maintain a comprehensive list of those fully approved by both credit and
legal. In addition, let me know if there are counterparties who you believe
have been approved as reference credits and are not on this list

Best regards,

Debbie


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/05/99 02:33
PM ---------------------------

Brent Hendry@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/05/99 01:06 PM
To: Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Duke claim against Enron

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/11/99 04:06 PM ---------------------------

Don Black
05/11/99 06:42 PM
To: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders@ECT,
Greg Whalley@ECT, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Duke claim against Enron

Although no formal notice has been rec'd from Duke, They have informed me
verbally that they do not intend to proceed with any claims against us.  If
you need any details please call me in BA or send me an email with your
contact instructions.  Given the nature of this topic I would prefer to
discuss my thoughts on the subject in person, if necessary.  Thanks for
everyone's help, and I apologise for any inconvenience.


Shirley,

Please, set a meeting with him on Monday.

Shirley, also please set up a meeting with Euford Cooper (Ford).
His extension is 3-5612.
Please, explain I did not have time to respond to his msg.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staehlin, Roberta
Sent:	Thursday, June 21, 2001 9:34 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Chris (VP-EES) would like to have breakfast or lunch with you sometime next week to discuss California issues and wanted me to check your availability. (x53725)


Please read the attached document for information about an exciting new
website for ETS employees!


The enclosed research report is being sent to you from PaineWebber by:

 Ben Bergfelt

 707 254 1531

 ben.bergfelt@PaineWebber.COM

Please contact them if you have any questions or would like to discuss this
material.

The information contained in the attached research report is believed to be
reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed.  PaineWebber Incorporated
and/or Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management Inc., affiliated companies and/or
their officers, directors, employees or stockholders may at times have a
position, including an arbitrage position, in the securities described herein
and may sell or buy them to or from customers.  These companies may from time
to time act as a consultant to a company being reported upon.

You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this document.  If you don't
already have it just click on this link,
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html, and follow the
on-screen instructions.  The Acrobat Reader is free of charge.

 - P011962020001222D01.pdf


Start Date: 1/30/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002013023.txt


Your approval is required for William Smith to attend the following class.
To grant approval, send a reply to "lpharr@enron.com" (NotesMail: LeRea
Pharr/HOU/ECT@ECT).
  Be sure to include employee's name and class number in reply.

Excel 97, Range Names and Database Features
Session Dates & Times:
  4/11/2000  8:30:00 AM-11:30:00 AM
Location: EB572
No Show/Participant Fee: $ 110.00

If you have any questions, please call the Technology Training Coordinator at
713-853-1816.


Houston Astros Baseball season tickets are available sale to employees at their face value.  The seats range in price from $2,490 to $3,237 for the season, and are located in the box and club levels.

If you're interested in being on the list of potential buyers for Enron's season tickets to the Astro's 2002 home games, please indicate your interest by 4PM, Central Time on Thursday, March 21 via e-mail to Elizabeth Linnell.  In your e-mail, please indicate the number of seats you're interested in purchasing for the full season (no partial season or individual games).  Once the number of interested potential buyers is determined, we'll know whether a lottery process will need to take place to fairly allocate the purchase opportunities and will communicate that to respondents.

Please note that the season begins on Friday, March 29 so payment for the tickets will need to be made early next week.

If you have any questions, please call Elizabeth Linnell at x33896 or Rachel Tobor at x31481.


To All:
Please prepare a draft ISDA by the end of business today and deliver to jxblanter@dukeenergy.com (Janna Blanter).
Sorry about the short notice!

-d


Over the last few months, we have been discussing our standard E-mail
platform with you, our customer.  Your feedback from the various
demonstrations, surveys and Technology Showcases validated that E-mail is a
vital part of your ability to communicate effectively.  However, your
feedback also indicated that you need your E-mail client to have additional
functionality and increased integration with other applications you use.
Therefore, to meet the demands of our fast-paced business, Enron Net Works is
standardizing our E-mail platform by deploying Microsoft Outlook 2000 to all
the Business Units we currently support for messaging.  (Project plans for
EBS, EES and Azurix are still being finalized and will be communicated
separately.)

This conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000 will improve your ability to
communicate and provide a more consistent look and feel across the standard
office applications you use on a daily basis.  We are excited about this
opportunity to provide a more robust, full function solution for your
messaging needs.   To provide you with additional details about the
conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000, we are including a list of
frequently asked questions about this project.

How does this project affect me?
Your current Lotus Notes E-mail system will be converted to Microsoft Outlook
2000.

What is Microsoft Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 is the messaging client you will use to read your E-mail, update
your calendar and personal address book, record to do lists, etc.

Why are we switching to Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 integrates more effectively with our new operating system,
Windows 2000, and the Microsoft products that Enron currently uses. With
Outlook 2000, we can provide you with a more robust mail platform including
the following new features:

Instant Messaging ) Ability to send person-to-person, immediate, pop-up
messages.
Improved Palm/CE Synchronization ) Allows for simpler and quicker updates of
your hand held device from multiple places.
Conferencing Server ) Ability to conduct video conferences from your desktop.
Web Access ) Ability to retrieve your Enron E-mail via a browser.
Fax Integration ) Ability to send/receive faxes from your E-mail Inbox.
Voice Mail Integration ) Ability to have your voice mail delivered to your
E-mail Inbox for retrieval.

When will the Outlook 2000 rollout start and when will I get it?
The pilot will begin in late October with the production rollout beginning in
late November.  We are finalizing our Business Unit rollout schedule.
Additional information will be provided to all business units as it becomes
available.  Project updates will be posted on the Project section of the IT
Central web site at http://itcentral.enron.com.  Additionally, you may send
questions to Outlook.2000@enron.com, and a member of the project team will be
happy to address these individually.


I don't have electronic versions of the tax treatment of restricted stock in Canada but will get you hard copies of the data/decisions provided by PriceWaterhouseCoopers on taxation in Canada and by Arthur Andersen on the discount applied.

John, I'll fax copies to you.

The formula we used to determine the taxable benefit on the amended T4 was:

$55.50 (Stock price on 01/18/00)  - 18.50 (33% discount) X 1.4499 (Fx rate) X number of units = Tax Benefit

Kim/John - can you please verify that your fax number is unchanged at 713-646-3227.  Thanks....


Thought you might be interested.  Cuiaba is really taking a toll.

Regards,

Rob
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 09:45 AM
---------------------------

John Novak
02/12/2001 01:48 PM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Celina
Ozorio/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Christiaan Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
ceb@tfts.tozzini.com.br, "PGS - Pedro G. Seraphim" <PGS@tfts.tozzini.com.br>,
Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: John Barquin

FYI, I understand from John Barquin that he has decided to take a 1 year
leave of absence from V&E, starting Feb 1.  Cuiab? will be continue to be
covered by Cliff Rankin and Steve Tarry and the rest of the V&E team.  In
addition, John will be available for consultation on historical matters as
necessary.

Regards,
 John


LaRence is running up against the deadline for associates to be promoted or
move out.  Here is my concern: LaRence has been worked for a number of people
who ended up leaving the company:  he worked for Dave Ramm at Enron Wind
(Dave left).  He also worked for John Palmisano who also has left the
company.  He ended up in a structuring group working for Brad Richter.  It's
hard to sort out what happened there but perhaps because of LaRence's lack of
interest in the area, which he apparently expressed to Brad, he has not done
much structuring work and Brad is not inclined to promote him or keep him in
the organization.  He has been told that he needs to find something now.

Could you guys look into this?  Perhaps we could either extend his deadline,
or find him something through the redeployment process?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/08/2000 07:28 AM -----

	Richard Shapiro@ENRON
	12/08/2000 07:10 AM

		 To: LaRence Snowden/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 Subject: Re: Government / Regulatory Affairs Opportunities

I don't really have a need anywhere in my group at the momment- will keep you
advised of any changes.

LaRence Snowden@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
12/06/2000 04:21 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Government / Regulatory Affairs Opportunities

Per a conversation with Steve Kean, I am forwarding a copy of my resume for
your review.  Since coming to Enron, I have desired an opportunity in our
Government / Regulatory Affairs area.  While here, I have been involved in
the commercial end of the business; primarily on the international side and
now in EBS.  I would like to discuss possible opportunities with you as soon
as possible.

Thanks for your consideration.

LaRence B. Snowden
Enron Broadband Services - Structuring
(713) 853-5132


I got a new cell phone today and wanted to make sure that I passed out the
new number.  As of next week, my 832 number will no longer be working.

My new cell phone number is 713-202-9588


I know this is very late notice, but up until yesterday I didn't think I was
going to be free on Saturday.  My brother-in-law is hosting a tournament on
Saturday at Cypress Lakes, which is just off of Hwy 290 at Cypress Rosehill.
In other words, BFE.  $70 will get you a round of golf, lunch, and beer.  He
will have a keg.  There will be prizes for the winners.  It is a four man
best ball scramble.  Tee time is early:  7:30am.  I sent this to guys I
either know play or think play.  If you have someone else in mind, feel free
to forward the message.  I don't have a team at all and wanted to see if
anyone was interested.  Let me know.

DG    3-9573


Great.  I'm gone.  I'll have my cell phone on later.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 11:33 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Ok, I'll mark you out then.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/02/2000 11:17 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Let's just assume I'll be out Friday afternoon.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 11:16 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

I'm sure he gets that from you.  He'll be fine, just get him the help that he
needs.  Let me know about Friday when you decide.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/02/2000 11:13 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

I suspect that there are several options.

He is such a sweet, cute, smart thing.  You will like him. He is very very
charming.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 11:12 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

He can be helped though right?  Block out Friday afternoon?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/02/2000 10:58 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

We've known, but is has gotten to be a bigger issue as he has gotten older.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 10:53 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Are you just finding out?  I know there are things that can be done to help
that situation.  Do you want me to block you out for Friday afternoon as
well.  You need to get this taken care of quickly for Michael's sake.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/02/2000 10:40 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Michael problems. He has ADD and some other lesser learning problems.  We are
going to meet  with the specialist next week.

I'm going to try to take off Friday afternoon as well.  We are thinking of
changing his school, and Neil and I need to go visit a new one.

HECTIC!

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 09:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Are you ok?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/01/2000 06:03 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Please protect Thursday afternoon, August 10th for me.  I have some important
personal stuff to take care of.


Bill and Vince, please see the attached memorandum.  Vince, this relates to
what we briefly spoke about during our recent meeting.

Cheryl, can you set up a meeting for Bill, Vince and I to meet and discuss?

Thanks.

RZ


No invite here.

I thought Gray was too old for birthdays!

Maybe IEP should give him a nice big candle to light the cake.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Julee Malinowski-Ball [mailto:jmball@ns.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 8:44 AM
To: Nam Nguyen; Bill Carlson; Bill Woods; Bob Ellery; Bob Escalante; Carolyn
Baker; Curtis Kebler; David Keane; David Parquet; Dean Gosselin; Duane
Nelson; Ed Tomeo; Frank DeRosa; Greg Blue; Hap Boyd; iep@iepa.com; Jack
Pigott; Jeff Dasovich; Jim Willey; Joe Greco; Joe Ronan; John Stout;
Jonathan Weisgall; Kassandra Gough; Ken Hoffman; Kent Fickett; Lynn
Lednicky; Marty McFadden; Paula Soos; Richard Hyde; Robert Lamkin; Roger
Pelote; Stephanie Newell; Steve Ponder; Steven Kelley; Sue Mara; Tandy
McMannes; Tony Wetzel; Trond Aschehoug; William Hall
Cc: john.g.larrea@williams.com
Subject: Fw: Governor's Birthday party invite

See below.

----- Original Message -----
From: Larrea, John <mailto:John.g.Larrea@williams.com>
To: 'Julee  <mailto:jmball@ns.net> Malinowski-Ball'
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 7:56 AM
Subject: Governor's Birthday party invite

Julee, Williams received a faxed invitation to the Governor's
Birthday party at Haim Saben's house about a week and a half ago.  Do you
know if any other generators or marketers in IEP received the invite?  Who
in IEP would know?

John G. Larrea
Governmental Relations
850 Stillwater Road, Suite 150
West Sacramento, CA 95605
(916) 376-3650
(916) 376-3610
(916) 616-7062 mobile
john.g.larrea@williams.com

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042407.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 7 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 7 / Preferred: -575.00 / Final: -574.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  TRADING_SC: NES1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 7 / Preferred:   2.13 / Final:   1.58)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


At the request of David Minns their short name in Lotus Notes will be EAF
(for Enron Australia Finance).   David gave me a list of their masters, so I
am going to enter just the names and agreement.  David and Alison will flesh
out the rest of the data when he gets back.


IT IS ALIVE...

-----Original Message-----
From: John Chambers [mailto:John.Chambers@Bisys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:45 AM
To: c.r.zander@att.net; chet_fenner@bmc.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com; erwollam@hotmail.com; knipe3@msn.com; Brian Constantine
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

I'll respond whey ya'll finally get it together.

BUT.... Once again, since this occurs during Lent, I guess I'll be the
designated......

I'm there, as long as I ain't going to loose something before I get
home.

John

>>> "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com> 02/26/02 11:30AM >>>
Where is Chad?? Chet??? Does Chambers ever respond to anything...who is
he, for that matter? For the love of God...

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:27 AM
To: knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net;
Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com; Brian Constantine
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

NO< NO< NO... this is now going to get way to confusing. WHo is going
anyway, just me and you Brian?

You need to make your pick and send out a REVISED FINAL PLAN after
hearing
from everyone.

>From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>
>To: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>, "Erik Wollam"
><erwollam@hotmail.com>, "Fenner, Chet" <Chet_Fenner@bmc.com>,
><knipe3@msn.com>
>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:22:34 -0600
>
>According to E, that is indeed the case. I will roll the dice and go
to
>Tampico (leave any valuables locked securely in your glove box). Set
alarm.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:15 AM
>To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com
>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>
>yes, according to chet's co-worker
>	-----Original Message-----
>	From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
>	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:14 AM
>	To: Parks, Joe; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com
>	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>	Is Thursday night, "Man Night" for "those kinds of men" too???
>
>	-----Original Message-----
>	From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
>	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:09 AM
>	To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com

>	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>
>	so your proposing we are going to the stabbing cabin. go to
tampico
>		-----Original Message-----
>		From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
>		Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:08 AM
>		To: Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com; Parks,
Joe
>		Subject: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>
>		Men,
>
>		            The final descision on the night of men will
be as follows...
>
>		Where: Tony's Mexican (bring your own clown and
accessories, please)
>
>		When: Thursday 2/28 at 7:15 pm.
>
>		We will wait until Zander is able to attend, to try the
Tampico place.
>Would rather go w/ someone who knows the drill.
>
>		I am very much looking forward to seeing all of you
men.
>
>

>                Pig-N-a-Stinky-blanket
>
>
>	**********************************************************************
>	This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or

>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise.
>Thank you.
>	**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


Let me first see if I can muster up enough legal people.  I'll let you know
shortly.  SS

Dale Neuner on 09/05/99 10:02:22 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Confirmation Desk/Legal luncheon

How about this Thursday.

Will you be setting it up?

Sara Shackleton
09/03/99 11:10 AM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confirmation Desk/Legal luncheon

Per our conversation, please advise of available dates.  We would like to
schedule as soon as possible.  Thanks.  SS


Sold 7000 to CES at meter 30AL for tomorrow - deal 169576.  The meter is not
set up in Sitara.  I sent a meter request to Faye Ellis.


Jeff, did Mark H. sign off on us removing triangular set-off between affiliated entities.  We have removed the concept as instructed by Barry, but do not want to send to PG&E unless we have Mark's OK.

Also, Eric/Barry you were going to canvass Bill in terms of what he would require for Credit.

Peter.

____________________________________
Peter C.M. Keohane
Vice President, Assistant General Counsel
and Secretary
Enron Canada Corp.
Phone:	(403) 974-6923
Fax:	(403) 974-6707
E-mail:	peter.keohane@enron.com


were we named?  jeff


It has been my understanding that the first section is supposed to be for
master swap agreements only.  Having other documents listed in that section
may be misleading to some parties who may misconstrue their use for general
trading purposes, such as Global Contracts.  That is why we created the
"Other Agreements" section, to house these other agreements.  My
understanding isthat the only reason other agreements has been listed in the
Master Swap Agreements Section is that they have been done so erroneously.
The drop down were not created too artfully created, allowing wrong
agreements to be put in Master Swap Agreements, which has been
proliferating.  If my understanding is not correct, than when did the
intentional use of that first section change?  I think putting all agreement
is a very bad idea.

	Sara Shackleton
	03/14/01 05:35 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

Tana:  I think the agreement is listed in Section 1 (all agreements) which is
not just Master Swap Agreements.  It is also listed in the approprate Section
13 entry.
Hope you're enjoying Canada!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 04:26 PM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

The above counterparty has been created in the Financial Trading Agreements
Database and is listed as a master swap agreement, and it's not.  It is an
Electronic Trading Agreement and needs to be moved down to "Other
Agreements".  Please let me know when that is done and I will delete the
entry in  the master swap agreement database.  Thanks!


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
? SoCal. Ed MOU Introduced as Bill
? House Committee Douses Emergency Energy Relief Act

MOU Has Its Day
Sources report that California Senator Polanco has introduced the legislation
today for the MOU between the Governor and SoCal Edison (SB 78XX).  As
reported earlier, sources still believe that there is not sufficient
legislative support for this measure to pass.  Senator Polanco's political
career was earlier jeopardized by personal scandal and now sources feel his
MOU sponsorship may be nothing more than a quid pro quo attempt to gain
support from Davis.  Additionally, the CPUC has added two necessary MOU
provisions to its next week voting agenda, though support for these issues
remains weak on the CPUC board.

House Energy Relief Efforts
The House Energy and Commerce Committee gave up plans to ease California's
energy woes because Republicans and Democrats could not settle a long
standing debate over price caps in the West.  Representative Waxman admitted
a compromise was never more than a noble idea throughout the debates, and
several delayed mark-up sessions for the bill.  Barton noted the bill had
little chance of aid California considering the time it would take to pass
the bill would be longer than the California summer.


This is my current list.  Keep in mind that this is a working list and there are a number of other companies on my master list.  I tried toprioritize the list.


It's a Party and You're Invited

   Occasion:  Farewell Party - Joni Veselack
  Day:  Sunday, September 10
  Time:  4:00 p.m.
  Place:  Woods on Augusta (pool area)

 I'm heading up north and didn't want to leave without having one
last get together around the pool!!! So, I decided to fire up the grill and
bbq.  I will have some snacks along with the bbq, but any side dishes or
desserts will definitely be enjoyed by one and all.

 Please bring your own "Cheer".

 Also, I need a head count for how much bbq to buy. (Get your minds
out of the gutter.) So, please let me know if you're attending.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Someone from Parquet's group is very likely to be there.  Government Affairs
hadn't planned to intend. I can give Parquet a call and find out and make
sure that there's good coordination with Transwestern.  Or TW can call him
directly.  Just let me know.

Best,
Jeff


I'm slow, but I catch on eventually.  Steffes was fired up when he called.
Sounds like the meeting went pretty well.  Have a good weekend.

Best,
Jeff

	Richard Shapiro
	10/06/2000 10:25 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: skean@enron.com, rshapiro@enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
mpalmer@enron.com, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Coffee w/Rebecca

Jeff is a very smart guy!

From: Jeff Dasovich on 10/06/2000 04:02 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: skean@enron.com, rshapiro@enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
mpalmer@enron.com, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Coffee w/Rebecca

Rebecca Smith called.  She wants to have coffee on Monday at 10 AM
California.  Topics:  1) How California got here.  2) How California can get
out of it.

Any chance of talking Monday AM prior to 10 AM California time?  I think I've
got the messages pretty well down, but might be useful to touch base.  Let me
know.

Hear's a message I'm practicing:

"Shapiro and Steffes went to FERC on Friday----problem solved."

Best,
Jeff


Keegan, please include me (as well as all members of the team) on any
distributions when members of the Swap Group are going to be out of the
office.  This would include Mark Taylor, Sara Shackleton, Carol St. Clair,
Mary Cook, Francisco Pinto Leite, Cheryl Nelson, Bob Bruce, Frank Sayre,
Susan Bailey, Samantha Boyd & Stephanie Panus.

Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 01:57 PM -----

	Samantha Boyd@ENRON
	02/20/2001 01:56 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cheryl Nelson

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 01:48 PM -----

	Keegan Farrell
	02/20/2001 09:39 AM

		 To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Kayla
Heitmeyer/Enron@EnronXGate, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rudwell
Johnson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cheryl Nelson

FYI
While traveling in New York this weekend, Cheryl Nelson has become ill.  She
is currently in New York, but is expected in the office tomorrow morning.  If
you should need to contact her, I will be glad to do so for you.  Feel free
to contact me at x5-3317, should you need my assistance.  Thank you for your
attention to this matter.  Regards, Keegan


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042622.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


ALLEGHENY ENERGY SUPPLY Scheduling Coordinator ID--

*****New ID is APX5******

-----Original Message-----
From: Cristiana Gallegos [mailto:cgallegos@apx.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: Announcement: Allegheny Energy Supply SCID Changing

> NOTICE TO MARKET PARTICIPANTS
> Allegheny Energy Supply is changing their SCID
>
> Effective Trade Date Monday, October 1, 2001 Allegheny Energy Supply
> (currently using APX1) will begin scheduling energy trades and bids under
> the new SCID; APX5.  Their OLD SCID 'APX1' WILL NO LONGER BE VALID.
> All of Allegheny Energy Supply's scheduling transactions will use the new
> SCID beginning with submission of Day Ahead schedules for Trade Date,
> Monday, October 1, 2001.
> Any advance schedules that may have already been submitted using the old
> SCID, 'APX1', must be removed (deleted) and rescheduled using the new
> SCID,
> APX5.
> If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of transactions with
> Allegheny Energy Supply, please contact:
> *	APX5 Scheduling D/A, 408-562-9112
> *	APX5 Scheduling H/A, Real Time desk 408-562-9112
> *	Other Issues / Questions, Erik Lopez 626-281-9475
> *	Allegheny Energy Supply 212-224-8850
>
> Distributed on behalf of Allegheny Energy Supply to facilitate the
> transition to their new SCID.
>
>
> ----
> Devon Walton
> Automated Power Exchange, Inc.
> Manager, Market Operations
> 5201 Great America Parkway Suite 522
> Santa Clara, CA 95054
> Phone: (408)517-2131   Fax: (408)517-2985
> Email: dwalton@apx.com
> Web: www.apx.com
>


Hi, Andrea!  Attached are updated power trading forms currently in use by
ENA.  I thought these may be useful.  I have forwarded these already to
Sami.  Let me know if I can be of any assistance or if you have a recent
English translation of a current deal.  Regards.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  David Portz                           05/08/2000 05:25 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Revised U.S. Wholesale Power Bilateral Master Agreement

Sara --  As discussed last Friday, attached is the referenced agreement
reflecting the power group's most current thinking, though it has not yet
been finalized or rolled out.  I also attach the 'long form confirmation'
used for trading wholesale power with counterparties who have not executed a
master agreement or other sort of enabling agreement with EPMI.  The latter
document has not been updated in about nine months' time and thus may not
reflect all proposed changes to the master.   The formatting may also be out
of kilter on Annex  A of the latter document but I believe it should be
usable by the person you are assisting in Brazil.  Please  contact me if you
have any questions.  --David


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Matt Cuocci" <mattc@elitebrokers.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:25 AM
To:	kammer; tim fox; maggi; mcginn
Subject:	Fw: HELP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

----- Original Message -----
From: <Chris_Spagnoli@rcn.net>
To: "Matt Cuocci" <mattc@elitebrokers.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: HELP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>
>
> You gotta see this man!
>
> (See attached file: MessageFromBoeing.pps)
>

 - MessageFromBoeing.pps


The above deal was in the system for 7/1/00 to 12/31/00.  We have had continued flow on the following dates...

1/4/01 to 1/8/01
1/29/01
2/7/01 to 2/28/01

The total flow has been 2804.

Can this deal be extended to cover the January and February flow?


Tana:

Emerson: NOT APPROVED FOR US PHYSICAL POWER. (Not a current CP/Not FERC
approved).

All the others on the list: "Ditto Credit" - or in other words,  no change to
the physical power profiles for these CP's if they are currently trading on
EOL. If they are not currently trading on EOL, then they are not approved for
physical power.

Thanks,

Shari


As a registered reader of PMA Online's Daily Power Report, we are happy to
provide you with a free trial subscription to Restructuring Today until May
3. Please see yesterday's issue attached. As a paid subscriber you receive
timely news the date of issue.

Restructuring Today has distinctive industry news and analysis which PMA
can't deliver from the wire services, and at only $487 for over 250 issues
each year, we consider it a bargain.

Act before May 9 to receive $50 off!

Check it out, and if you'd like to subscribe, just give us your name, email
and telephone number, hit "reply" and a subscription agent will contact you.
You can also find a subscription order form on the back page of the
newsletter.

Requires Acrobat Reader 3.1 or higher, available free at:
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html#reader

( ) YES, I WANT TO SUBSCRIBE TO RESTRUCTURING TODAY IN PDF FORMAT FOR ONLY
$437/year ($50 of the regular price for subscriptions orders placed before
May 9).

( ) I AM INTERESTED IN A CORPORATE SUBSCRIPTION TO RESTRUCTURING TODAY
(Provide telephone number)

NAME:

EMAIL*:

TELEPHONE:

( ) PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TRIAL SUBSCRIPTIONS IN THE FUTURE

Thanks for reading!

 - rt010430pma.pdf


Check this out.  I want to get any comments you might have before I sent it around.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:06 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:

Here's a cut at the taxonomy of regulatory risks associated with Direct Access. Please let me know if there are others I missed, or if there are changes needed to the ones listed.

1.	Retroactive Suspension of DA Contracts:  The PUC rules in a subsequent decision that DA is suspended on some date 	between July 1 and September 20th.

2.	Contract renewal forbidden:  The PUC includes contract renewal under the suspension of DA.

3.	No incremental "DASR'ing":  The PUC includes incremental additions and subtractions of DA customer's load under the 	suspension of DA (e.g., fast food chains, University campus)

4.	Cost allocation: the PUC adds new costs to DA accounts and/or disproportionately shifts existing costs to DA accounts.  	Costs with greatest risk of being shifted to DA customers include: IOU undercollection, bonds to repay the state general fund, 	and DWR contracts.  The costs associated with these categories are substantial.

Additional suggestions from Mike Day:

5.	DASR processing:	Related to #1 above, in that, if the utilities attempt to implement the Commission-ordered suspension 	in an onerous way, it may put at risk contracts executed prior to 09.20.01 but not yet DASR'd.

6.	Confidentiality of contract information:	The utilities and/or the PUC may require ESPs to show contracts as proof 		that contracts were executed prior to 09.20.01.

Key risks associated with each category:
Adverse to P/L
Adverse to hedge (demand risk)


Happy New Year.  We hope your holidays were enjoyable and restful.  For a pleasant start to 2002, please join your Enron colleagues for coffee and donuts this Friday, January 11, from 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. in the lobby of the Enron Building.  We look forward to seeing you there.


Ben,

I will be out of the office for the next couple of weeks on a honeymoon.  I
will be out until March 20th, so could you keep the deal list updated until
then?  Tina told me that you should already have access to the O:drive where
it is now listed.  You can access it at O:Corpdev/Gtg/Deals/Newlist.  I
created a new format so it will look little different.  Please let me know if
you have any questions.

Thank you,

Ben Thomason
x-58802