Today is a big day for ENRON!  This morning, we are rolling out the next step
toward empowering our most valuable resource -- you.  As of this morning,
most of you have access to the new eHRonline intranet site.

The new eHRonline functionality (a feature of the SAP implementation) is very
easy to use and is accessible through the Enron intranet (at
http://ehronline.enron.com).  Using eHRonline, not only can you enter your
own time, but also maintain your profile, and update personal data, including
home address, phone numbers, W-4 changes and emergency contact information.
Additionally, you will be able to view your individual pay advice and benefit
elections.

Remember the deadline for time entry is 3:00 pm CST, on June 30th -- all time
must be submitted and ready for payroll processing.  Because this is the
first period using SAP to record time, please work closely with your
timekeeper to ensure the deadline is met. By now, you should have received a
note from your timekeeper.  However, if you have not and are unsure who your
timekeeper is, please call the Site Manager for your Business Unit.  Their
names and numbers are listed below.

Because of the size of this rollout, we have to expect a few "bumps in the
road."  So, we,re asking you to be patient and work with us over the next few
weeks.  If you have questions, are experiencing problems, or would like more
information, please contact the Center of Expertise (COE).

Center of Expertise (COE)
The Center of Expertise can help answer many of your questions and provide
you with assistance if you are experiencing problems.  The COE is available
24 hours a day from Monday at 7:00 am CST through Friday at 7:00 pm CST.  You
can contact the COE:
Via phone at (713) 345-4SAP (4727)
COE website:  sap.enron.com (contains job aids, instructional materials,
forms and policies)
Via Lotus Notes at SAP COE/Corp/Enron
Via internet email at sap.coe@enron.com

BU Site Managers
Enron North America
 Cindy Morrow, (713) 853-5128
 Yvonne Laing, (713) 853-9326
Global Products
 Shelly Stubbs, (713) 853-5081
 Yvonne Laing, (713) 853-9326
Global Finance
 Jill Erwin, (713) 853-7099
 Yvonne Laing, (713) 853-9326
Gas Pipeline Group
 Michael Sullivan, (713) 853-3531
 Greg Lewis, (713) 853-5967
 Diane Eckels, (713) 853-7568
Global E&P
 Diane Eckels, (713) 853-7568
Enron Energy Services
 Bobby Mahendra, (713) 345-8467
 Daler Wade, (713) 853-5585
Corporate
 Todd Peikert, (713) 853-5243
Enron Renewable Energy Corp
 Joe Franz, (713) 345-5936
 Daler Wade, (713) 853-5585
Enron Investment Partners
 Yvonne Laing, (713) 853-9326

Job Aids and Reference Guides
Finally, the Apollo & Beyond training team has developed several useful
reference guides that you can access via the SAP website at sap.enron.com

Also, a brochure will be delivered to your mailstop today.  This brochure
provides step by step instructions on how you can use eHRonline to view and
update your personal information.


Please see below for the weekly status update of the GTV II project and the attached file for the updated project timeline.

GTV status meeting attendees:  Zhiyong Wei, Russ Severson, Jeremy Wong, Geoff Storey, Karima Husain, Jay Krish, Mike Swaim, Nayan Dattani, George Grant, Dave Nommensen, Bill Fortney, Chuck Ames.

Accomplishments:
?	Incorporating physical deal positions in TDS:
o	Changes for the view aggregation have been completed.
o	Expandable Total in Cash Position has been completed.
?	Single point of deal entry for term deals:
o	Phase 1 of single point of deal entry for term deals is in user test.
?	Gas Daily deals:
o	Revisions for changes to PortCalc application to create GDI calc in ERMS are in user test.
o	The development for the Curve shift reports has been completed.
o	Change CPR PortCalc to value outer month positions is in test.
?	Saving different views in TDS:
o	Completed and is currently in test.
?	Live feeds for Gas Daily/intra-month curves:
o	Released to production.
?	Option Grid (phase 2):
o	Released to production.
?	Gas Daily options (phase 2):
o	Released to production.
?	Basis Options (phase 2):
o	Development of deal entry type for Basis Options has been completed in TAGG.
o	Development of loading correlation curves has been completed.

Plans for the week ending 6/22/01:
?	Continue IT development of Phase I items.
o	Optimize the position manager's performance.
?	Continue IT development of Phase II issues.
o	New Process for roll-up aggregator on an ad hoc basis.
o	Change PortCalc to value spread options.
o	Option reports (PL reports).

Issues / Open Items:
None

Notes
?	The testing of phase 1 Single Point of Deal Entry for Term Deals uncovered a couple of existing issues with Sitara Trade Blotter.
?	A couple of issues need to be looked at regarding PortCalc and the curve shift report for Gas Daily options.

Thanks

Zhiyong


have you sent Laurel anything?!  If not, I'll pull the info together.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bolt, Laurel
Sent:	Tuesday, January  8, 2002 8:12 AM
To:	Evans, Casey; White, Stacey W.; Bruce, Michelle
Subject:	FW: PSEG final settlements

We would really like to try to have all of the information related to PSEG by the end of this week.  Please let me know if this is not possible.

Thanks,
Laurel

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bolt, Laurel
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:51 AM
To:	Aucoin, Evelyn; Baxter, Bryce; Bruce, Michelle; White, Stacey W.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Cc:	Baughman, Edward
Subject:	FW: PSEG final settlements

We are in the process of trying to reach a final settlement with PSEG for all remaining settlements and MTM value of the future contracts.  They would like to finalize this by tomorrow or early next week.  I have told them that could be very difficult.  They would like to know when you expect the final reconciled numbers to be available.

Jeff/Stacey/Michelle,
Could you send me the MTM value for all Jan '02 and forward emissions, gas and power deals.

Thanks,
Laurel

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bolt, Laurel
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 6:48 AM
To:	Aucoin, Evelyn; Baxter, Bryce; Bruce, Michelle
Cc:	Baughman, Edward
Subject:	PSEG final settlements

I am helping Ed Baughman negotiate a final settlement with PSEG, and was wondering if you could send me the final Nov and Dec numbers for Fin and Phy gas, Fin and Phy Power and Emissions.  Please let me know when you expect to have the numbers available.  If you have any questions, please give me a call.

Thanks,
Laurel Bolt
713-853-4873


Here is my file.  I will be right up.  Thanks.

John


Boys:
I'm sorry you were not able to attend last night.  I do appreciate your
efforts to make this book as successful as it has been.  It's not quite the
same as being in my company, but take your respective wives, or swap, I don't
care, out this weekend on me.  Try to keep it under $300 per couple.  Keep up
the good work,
John


Pearce,

I shall be in my office, receiving many calls during the course.
Some of the calls may be confidential. This makes it a bit
difficult.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Pearce W Hammond @ ENRON                           01/08/2001 11:49 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PJM Training

Vince,

I was interested in signing up for the 2/27 PJM training, but found out the
class was full.  After calling PJM, they told me that you were the only other
person at Enron signed up for the course.  I was just curious, if I could sit
with you and do the training at the same time since it is done over the
computer.

If this is a problem, I understand.  Just thought I would ask.

Thanks,

Pearce Hammond
Associate
Northeast Power Origination
x37379


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000068017&Page=MyReq.


Good luck and thank you for a job well done.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000 11:04
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lisa Bills                           12/01/2000 10:47 AM

To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew F
Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Final Doc Run + Due Diligence for Closing

Ok Team, we are in the last throws of documentation of financing documents!
They will be done by noon.  If anyone has comments, they need to be in before
that.  I also want to receive written confirmation from Accounting, Tax, ENA
Legal, EGF Legal that they have signed off on the documents.   The only
document left outstanding which the legal team is busily working on for
completion [today hopefully?] is the EPC Contract.

Starting on Monday, the legal team needs to begin the closing due diligence
process.  Given that we thought we had a great call with GE this week and got
at least S&S's signoff on consent letter, we haven't heard from anyone.  This
is UNACCEPTABLE since it puts not just TurboPark but all the deals relying on
TurboPark in jeopardy!

I will arrange a meeting on Monday to walk through the closing checklist with
the legal team to insure that everything can be completed by December 13th.

CLOSING WILL OCCUR ON DECEMBER 15TH!

Happy Holidays,
Lisa


Kay,

Thanks for the help yesterday, and thanks for remember ing the MS pledge.
Please make the check out to the National MS Society ($50).  I can come up
later.

Thank you very much,

Reagan


Greetings:
I'm the only one who hasn't left yet for the dome.  If it's OK with you, I'd like to come by and pick up Annie.  Likely get there around 7:30.  That work for you?


Martin,

Please, take a look at Question 3.
Who is the right person at EBS?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001
07:16 AM ---------------------------

Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/15/2001 01:12:32 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Summer internship

Dr. Kaminski,

Sorry for the late response,
it took me some time to coordinate things.
Finally, it's almost dont :-)
It turned out that from June to August
will be best for me for work at ENRON
(Say June.4 to August.4)

But I still need to know several things from your side.
Could you answer following questions?

First:
Is my suggested working period is OK with you?
If so, let me know what to do for settlement
during the period.

Second:
I got a list of work, I might be able to do for
DealBench team from Ross and Suresh.
I'd like to know it is still a valid work list:
The list he sent is as following:

> 1.  Write a paper in layman's terms that answers
> questions like the following:
> Benefits of auctioning online for both buyers and
> sellers, particularly in reverse auctions
> Explanation how multi-variable auctions are not
> as efficient as price-only auctions (is this true?)
> How many participants are recommended for a
> successful live auction
> What types of goods and services are best suited
> for live auctions versus sealed bid quotes
> Opinions on lotting strategies
> Trends in online private auctions

> 2.  Identify appropriate recent auction research (3
> or 4 papers out of the 90+ you provided)and obtain approvals from the
> authors to post on our site

> 3. Create a list/bibiliography of relevant auction
> literature (with hyperlinks?)

> 4.  Would you be willing to offer auction consulting
> services to our customers (if they are interested)

Third:
There is an e-procurement forum at Haas School of business,
in May 22. The chair of the forum is my advisor Prof. Arie Segev.
A person from Wells Fargo Bank will talk about Wells Fargo's role
in e-marketplace payment initiative,
where ENRON broadband services is also one of key players
along with Citibank.
He asked me whether you can contact a person at
ENRON broadband services, who's related to the initiative.
He wants to know whether we will have a speaker from ENRON
to see ENRON's perspective, in the Forum.

Here is a link to news related to the initiative,

http://www.internetweek.com/story/INW20000808S0001

Fourth:
My advisor wants to know whether
there could be any opportunity to do a case study,
regarding ENRON's business.
He is interested in e-procurement and e-marketplaces.
Business model and System architecture...

Thanks for reading this long email.
I'll look forward to your answer..
I am sorry for giving you so much burden
to answer those questions possibly not easy to answer.

Warm regards,
Jinbaek

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jinbaek Kim
Ph.D Candidate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
U.C.Berkeley
http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek

Go Bears!

      :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
     :      a   a      :                 __....._
     :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
      :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
       `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
        : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
        `.   '"'                                   ;
         `.               '                        ;
          `.     `        :           `            ;
           .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
         .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
     __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
   .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
   `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
         `.......-'                 `........'

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

>
> Jinbaek,
>
> This is fine though you are welcome to spend more
> time with us this summer.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/04/2001 03:45:40 PM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Summer internship
>
>
> Dr. Kaminski,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
> Before I tell you the time frame,
> I'll need to talk with my advisor, first.
> Because here is an on-going-project.
> I need to coordinate the schedule.
>
> I'll appreciate it if you understand my situation,
> and give me some time (less than a week, of course).
>
> For your reference,
> probably
> the dates I'd like to ask you will be
> from mid-May to mid-July (2 months)
>
> Warm regards,
> Jinbaek
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jinbaek Kim
> Ph.D Candidate
> Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> U.C.Berkeley
> http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
>
> Go Bears!
>
>       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
>      :      a   a      :                 __....._
>      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
>       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
>        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
>         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
>         `.   '"'                                   ;
>          `.               '                        ;
>           `.     `        :           `            ;
>            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
>          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
>      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
>    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
>    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
>          `.......-'                 `........'
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Jinbaek,
> >
> > You can coordinate the details with me.
> > Let me know what the time frame is for you
> > and we shall send you an appropriate offer.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/02/2001 04:43:06 PM
> >
> > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Summer internship
> >
> >
> > Dr. Kaminski,
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> > Of course, I'll be happy to have an opportunity
> > to work at such a wonderful company.
> > I was contacting with Surech Raghavan at Deal Bench team,
> > and was going to express my appreciation to you again
> > after settling down process with them.
> >
> > For the period of working,
> > I still need to coordinate with my advisor and
> > may need to adjust according to that.
> > but anyway, I'll try to coordinate smoothly.
> >
> > Please let me know whether I should keep contacting
> > with Deal Bench team,
> > for working period and
> > for misc. living support such as finding a place, rent a car, etc.
> >
> > I appreciate you so much again,
> > for arranging such meetings and giving me an opportunity.
> > All this opportunity will not be available to me,
> > without your kind help.
> >
> > Warm Regards,
> > Jinbaek
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jinbaek Kim
> > Ph.D Candidate
> > Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> > U.C.Berkeley
> > http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
> >
> > Go Bears!
> >
> >       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
> >      :      a   a      :                 __....._
> >      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
> >       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
> >        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
> >         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
> >         `.   '"'                                   ;
> >          `.               '                        ;
> >           `.     `        :           `            ;
> >            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
> >          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
> >      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
> >    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
> >    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
> >          `.......-'                 `........'
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Sorry for a delay in getting back to you.
> > > We would like very much to offer you a summer internship.
> > >
> > > Please, let me know if you are interested.
> > >
> > > Vince Kaminski
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


Greg:

Just an update on the Stanford Summer Associate and Full-time Associate
recruiting efforts:

We have pre-selected 19 Summer Associate candidates and 7 Full-time Associate
candidates.  The schedule of interviewers for Round 1 and Round 2 is listed
below.  I was able to get Elliot Mainzer and Steve Swain on the Round 1
interview schedule.  They were Tim Belden's picks for interviewers from his
group.  I have left a message for Chris Calger to see if he might be
available for Round 2 interviews and am waiting to hear back from him.

Listed below are logistics.  Let me know if you are available for Friday
interviews.

Regards,
Celeste Roberts

Wednesday, March 14, 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Dinner with students selected to
interview
       Il Fornaio, the Sala Del Canaletto Room
       520 Cowper Street, Palo Alto
       (650) 853-3888
       Attire: Business Casual

       Enron attendees:
       Vince Kaminski - MD
       Brad Alford - VP
       Matt Harris - VP
       Brad Romine - Mgr
        Theresa Riedman - Mgr
       Steve Swain - Mgr
       Elliot Mainzer - Mgr
       Martin Lin - Mgr
       Mauricio Mora - Associate
       Celeste Roberts - Director
       Althea Gordon - Recruiter

Thursday, March 15, 8:30 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.  Round 1 interviews for both
Summer and Full Time Associates
       Stanford GSB Career Services Center
       Interviewers:
       Theresa Riedman
       Brad Romine
       Brad Alford
       Martin Lin
       Elliot Mainzer
       Steve Swain
       Mauricio Mora - Greeter/Alternate Interviewer

Thursday, March 15, 12:15 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Lunch with Dean George Parker
(Associate Dean of Academics) and
       Sherrie Taguchi (Director of Career Services).
       Stanford GSB Career Services Center
       We will be ordering lunch in.

Friday, March 16, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.*   Round 2 interviews for both
Summer and Full Time Associates
       Stanford GSB Career Services Center
       Interviewers:
       Vince Kaminski
       Matthew Harris

* Please note that this is an approximate time that will be based on the
number of candidates who successfully pass Round 1 interviews on Thursday.

Your hotel information is as follows:

       Stanford Park Hotel
       100 El Camino Real
       Menlo Park
       (650) 322-1234

Upon confirmation of your participation you will receive your hotel
confirmation number.  In the event that you have not received your hotel
confirmation number please contact Cathy Lira, at x54049.


As a follow-up to the Enron Net Works All Employee meeting on October 5, we
are pleased to announce a number of organizational changes.

Beth Perlman, currently CIO for EA Systems, will work closely with Mark
Pickering on a number of key projects for Enron Net Works.  Additionally,
Beth plans to explore various commercial opportunities within Enron.
Replacing Beth in her current role will be Steve Hotte, currently CIO for
EGS.

Anthony Dayao will continue as CIO for EES Systems.  In addition to his
current responsibilities, Anthony will assume responsibility for creating a
combined Wholesale/Retail Power Trading and Risk Management system.

Jeff Johnson will move into the new role of CIO for EGM/EIM Systems.

John Paskin will transfer to the Houston office from London to take up the
new role of CIO for Corporate Systems. His group will include the ISC,
Enterprise Portal, Intranet Solutions, CRM strategy, Treasury Systems,
Development Support and will matrix into HR IT Systems.

Continuing in their current positions are Inja Chun, CIO for EBS Systems;
Paul Freeman, CIO for Enron Europe; Jay Webb, CIO for eCommerce, which now
includes Commodity Logic Systems; and Jenny Rub, CIO for Infrastructure.

All of the above positions report into to Mark Pickering in the Office of
the Chairman for Enron Net Works.  Transitions into their new positions
will begin within the next two weeks and should be complete by the end of
the year.

We are currently interviewing individuals to serve as CIO for EGS, as well
as an individual to serve as head of our Enterprise Framework group.  We
will keep you posted on the progress of these searches.

Please join us in congratulating all of these individuals on their new
responsibilities.


I am seeking information on where to find copies of LNG Contracts that were
previously in the domain of the old Enron International company.   Enron
North America will be establishing a risk book to manage LNG positions on a
worldwide basis and we need copies of all contracts to set this up.  These
contracts may or may not be related to the Dabhol project.  If you can
provide guidance or information as to where to find these contracts, I would
appreciate it.  You may respond via email or call me at 713-853-6079 in
Houston.

Thank you for your attention.


I am enclosing the copies of presentations I have reviewed over the weekend.
Please, take a final look at your sections. I have made no changes or minor
cosmetic changes.

The overall presentation time is limited and we have to limit every presenter
to a  maximum
time allocation of  5 minutes (strictly enforced).

Vince

P.S. Mike, still missing the electronic version of your presentation.


<http://www.aopa.org/images/epilot/epilotheader2.jpg>
Special Bulletin
October 21, 2001

FAA OPENS MOST CLASS B AIRSPACE TO VFR

AOPA KEEPS FOCUS ON REMAINING CITIES, SPECIALTY OPERATIONS
The FAA on Sunday afternoon released a notam announcing the phased reopening of 12 more "enhanced Class B" (ECB) areas to most VFR operations. Last week, most VFR flights were allowed to resume in 15 other ECB areas. This leaves three metropolitan areas-New York City; Washington, D.C.; and Boston-where VFR remains prohibited.

"This is an important milestone and fantastic news for VFR pilots," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. Restoring VFR flight in ECB airspace has been an AOPA priority for weeks. "But now our focus must turn to restoring operations in the three remaining metropolitan areas and in getting the news and traffic reporters, banner towers, and other specialty operators back in the air everywhere."

Much like the release of airspace last week, this release will be phased in over three days. The first five will be reopened on Monday. The opening will follow the schedule below:

Monday, October 22, at 1100Z (7 a.m. Eastern time): Atlanta, Georgia; Las Vegas, Nevada; Los Angeles, California; Miami, Florida, and San Francisco, California.

Tuesday, October 23, at 1100Z (7 a.m. Eastern time): Denver, Colorado; Detroit, Michigan; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and San Diego, California.

Wednesday, October 24, at 1100Z (7 a.m. Eastern time): Chicago, Illinois, and Orlando, Florida.

The procedures for these cities are the same as those established for the 15 areas opened last week. Aircraft flying in enhanced Class B (ECB) airspace must have an encoding transponder and squawk 1200 (or as assigned by ATC). Aircraft without a transponder must get a waiver from ATC for each flight in ECB airspace. If equipped to do so, pilots flying in ECB airspace should monitor the guard frequency of 121.5 MHz. The notam also asks pilots to operate their aircraft in a "normal" manner, avoiding aerobatics as well as circling or loitering.

See AOPA's "frequently asked questions <http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsitems/2001/011019faq.html>" for more information on rules applicable to enhanced Class B airspace.

The full text of Sunday's notam is below. While this is an official FDC notam, AOPA recommends that pilot check the latest notams prior to any flight operations. In recent weeks, some notams have been modified repeatedly or rescinded. AOPA will continue to post updates promptly on AOPA Online <http://www.aopa.org/>.

  _____

FDC 1/1474 FDC...SPECIAL NOTICE...VFR INSIDE ECB...

FOR REASONS OF NATIONAL SECURITY, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 22, 2001, UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE, PURSUANT TO TITLE 14 CFR PART 91.139 THE FOLLOWING EMERGENCY AIR TRAFFIC RULES ARE IN EFFECT:

U.S. REGISTERED AIRCRAFT CONDUCTING PART 91 AND PART 137 VFR OPERATIONS ARE AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE INSIDE "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE" AS SPECIFIED IN THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS:

1) DEFINITION REPEATED: "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE" REFERS TO THE CLASS B AIRSPACE AND THAT AIRSPACE UNDERLYING AND OVERLYING THE CLASS B AIRSPACE FROM THE SURFACE TO FL180. THIS DEFINITION DOES NOT CHANGE THE ASSOCIATED RULES AND/OR SERVICES PRESCRIBED FOR CLASS B AIRSPACE. ADDITIONALLY, THIS DEFINITION DOES NOT CHANGE THE ASSOCIATED RULES AND/OR SERVICES PRESCRIBED FOR THE UNDERLYING/OVERLYING AIRSPACE.

2) THE FOLLOWING OPERATIONS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS PROVISION AND REMAIN PROHIBITED FROM OPERATING VFR IN "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE": NEWS REPORTING, TRAFFIC WATCH, CIVIL AIRCRAFT BANNER TOWING, SIGHTSEEING (IN ROTORCRAFT AND AIRPLANES) CONDUCTED FOR COMPENSATION OR HIRE (UNDER PART 91, PURSUANT TO THE EXCEPTION IN 119.1(E)(2)), AND AIRSHIP/BLIMP OPERATIONS.

3) AIRCRAFT MUST OPERATE USING A CODED RADAR BEACON TRANSPONDER AT ALL TIMES WITHIN THE "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE", USING NORMAL VFR CODES, I.E. 1200.

4) CAPABLE AIRCRAFT MUST MONITOR THE GUARD FREQUENCY ON 121.5/ 243.0 AT ALL TIMES WITHIN THE "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE".

5) APPROVAL/WAIVER TO OPERATE WITHOUT A CODED RADAR BEACON TRANSPONDER MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE FLIGHT, AND ON A FLIGHT-BY-FLIGHT BASIS, FROM THE LOCAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITY CONTROLLING THE AFFECTED "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE".

6) EFFECTIVE MONDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2001, AT 1100 UTC, OPERATIONS ARE APPROVED AS DESCRIBED ABOVE IN THE FOLLOWING "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE": ATLANTA, GA; LOS ANGELES, CA; LAS VEGAS, NV; MIAMI, FL; SAN FRANCISCO, CA.

7) EFFECTIVE TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001, AT 1100 UTC, OPERATIONS ARE APPROVED AS DESCRIBED ABOVE IN THE FOLLOWING "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE": DENVER, CO; PITTSBURGH, PA; PHILADELPHIA, PA; DETROIT, MI; SAN DIEGO, CA.

8) EFFECTIVE WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2001, AT 1100 UTC, OPERATIONS ARE APPROVED AS DESCRIBED ABOVE IN THE FOLLOWING "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE": ORLANDO, FL AND CHICAGO, IL.

VFR PILOTS IN "ENHANCED CLASS B AIRSPACE" ARE ENCOURAGED TO OPERATE THEIR AIRCRAFT IN A NORMAL MANNER, AVOIDING AEROBATICS, LOITERING OR CIRCLING, AND UNPREDICTABLE FLIGHT PATHS. PILOTS ARE URGED TO CHECK NOTICES TO AIRMEN (NOTAMS) AND CALL THE LOCAL FLIGHT SERVICE STATION AT 1-800-WX-BRIEF PRIOR TO EACH FLIGHT.

  _____

Contact ePilot at epilot@aopa.org. <mailto:epilot@aopa.org> Having difficulty using this service? Visit the ePilot Frequently Asked Questions
now at AOPA Online. <http://www.aopa.org/members/files/pilot/epilot/faq.html> Changing your mailing or e-mail addresses? Do not reply to this automated message. Instead, click here <http://www.aopa.org/members/authentication/profile.html> to update.

To UNSUBSCRIBE: Do not reply to this automated message - click here Unsubscribe <mailto:10181195.40148257.4041268@r1.replyserver.com?subject=unsubscribe>, then hit the "Send" button - do not include a message. To SUBSCRIBE: visit <http://www.aopa.org/members/epilot.html>.

AOPA * 421 Aviation Way * Frederick, MD 21701 * Tel: 800/USA-AOPA or 301/695-2000
Copyright ? 2001. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association.

  <http://www.aopa.org/images/epilot/footer.jpg>


Mark:  As I mentioned to you yesterday, I was volunteered to draft Sutton's
speech with just a few days notice.  Fortunately, Rob Bradley and his staff,
including, Almad and Joan were very helpful in providing me with slides and
talking points.  Rob also packaged the final presentation with all the
appropriate protocols.  I was asked to focus on Enron as a "new economy
company" and "prescriptions" for liberalizing the gas market in Brazil.  The
former is important because Enron is adapting the new business model in
Brazil and it's not very well understood there.   The latter was presented in
a global context in order to advocate change in a more subtle manner.
However, as you can see in the attached news story, Joe was direct in
assessing the current situation in Brazil.  Keith


What does your schedule look like Wednesday am?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/31/2000 09:09
AM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 10/30/2000 02:24 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: enovate intercompany loan

What about Wednesday morning to discuss Bracewell's draft of the intercompany
loan agreement?  Kay could you check Heather's availability? Anyone else that
should be included?

Thanks,

Gregg


Maria Pavlou has graciously agreed to give the TW Commercial Group a brief review of the Global Settlement on Thursday, November 1 from 10 - 11:30 am in 49C2.  Please mark your calendars if you are interested in attending.

Lorraine


pins and needles.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Landry, Chad
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	FW: the atmosphere at this

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Landry, Chad
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Blanchard, Timothy; 'matt.lenhart@enron.com'
Subject:	the atmosphere at this

company is pathetic.  everyone is on edge.  it is like working at a morgue/funeral parlor.

ckl


thanks for the update.


Since terminations are processed in lag, here is the report as of 5/20.
Thanks.

Major takeaways :  The number of good performers leaving in recent weeks is
increasing.  Although termination activity is highest seen in recent years at
1,300 ytd, there have been 1900 new hires (including acquisitions) - a net
growth of 600 employees.  More details in the attachment.  Thanks.


FYI:

With all of the free time you will have this summer, why not do some career
planning.

If you want to work on: a job search strategy, updating your resume,
practicing interviewing, learning how to hire and interview people for
yourself, conducting a targeted job search, networking tips, updating your
resume, salary negotiations tips, deciding what you want to be when you
grow-up or any other career related issues, I will be here all summer to
assist you.

If you anticipate having any special career needs in the coming year please
let me know.  During the summer I will be doing a lot of planning and
scheduling of events for the coming year, if you having anything in
particular you would like to have offered either on an individual or group
basis please let me know

Remember we can work together via phone, fax, email or in person.  You do
not have to be on campus to utilize the services.  Plus, read your Haas
emails during the summer, that is how I will be sending out announcements
for upcoming events.

Everyone have a great summer.


I'll get to this later today.   Call if you have immediate issues.  Sara

	"Ho, Wendy" <who@velaw.com>
	06/08/2000 05:15 PM

		 To: "Shackleton, Sara (Enron)" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Project PATS

Hi Sara,

Gareth and I were going over the documents this morning and was wondering if
you have any comments on the revised Swaps (the three currency swaps and the
two option swaps).  Could you fax me your comments?

Could you also forward to me the Master Agreement btw UBS and Enron and
Enron's std language with respect to set offs, jurisdiction etc.. (as per
your e-mail two weeks ago).  Thanks.

Wendy Ho
Vinson & Elkins
1001 Fannin St. Suite 2300
Houston, TX 77002
tel: 713-758-3895
fax: 713-615-5849


Here is a link to the schedule.

http://astros.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/hou/news/hou_news_story.jsp?GXHC_gx_session_id_=5205ad314fc66af4&article_id=hou_20011213_collegeclassic_news&team_id=hou


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 01/20/2000
02:45 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Elizabeth Soto                           01/19/2000 11:01 AM

To: Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ana Correa/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Prayer Request]

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2000
11:00 AM ---------------------------

Chantelle Villanueva
01/18/2000 03:34 PM
To: cassandra.hernandez@mwk.com, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
Perez/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alisha Guerrero/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Prayer Request]

---------------------- Forwarded by Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT on
01/18/2000 03:34 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Andrea R Guillen                           01/18/2000 02:51 PM

Sent by: Andrea R Guillen
To: Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rosa
Jaramillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, iguillen@aglife.com,
lgarza@jcpenney.com, Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Prayer Request]

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000
02:49 PM ---------------------------

Pamela Sonnier
01/18/2000 02:46 PM
To: Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jessie Patterson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Prayer Request]

---------------------- Forwarded by Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000
02:46 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jessie Patterson                           01/18/2000 12:42 PM

To: JCaradine@Hytrol.com, Pamela Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, kjolivet@bmheagleton.com, Miner.LC@epamail.epa.gov,
zlong@Spelman.edu, slong@hom.org
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Prayer Request]

---------------------- Forwarded by Jessie Patterson/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

goldenhawk@webtv.net (Willie Patterson) on 01/15/2000 11:56:57 PM
To: BurnisBrazil@email.msn.com, bmowen2@i2k.com, cvaught@gfs.com,
c-ousley@email.msn.com, langenbach@voyager.net, Irma@dsa.admin.unt.edu,
Jessie Patterson/HOU/ECT@ECT, LadyCap2@webtv.net, othomas@wt.net,
maurice@pionet.net, pam.coleman@familychristian.com, maierson@bellsouth.net,
SGou929788@aol.com, w8aju@mciworld.com, walthite@email.msn.com,
WThomas40@aol.com, z_pattersowl@TITAN.SFASU.EDU
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Prayer Request]

Received: from mailsorter-102-5.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.31) by
storefull-277.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 20:24:53
-0800 (PST)
Received: by mailsorter-102-5.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix) id 61DCA68;
Sat, 15 Jan 2000 20:24:53 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-To: goldenhawk@webtv.net
Received: from imo20.mx.aol.com (imo20.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.10]) by
mailsorter-102-5.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D9A50 for
<goldenhawk@webtv.net>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 20:24:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from WThomas40@aol.com by imo20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.6.) id
x.51.33874d (4229); Sat, 15 Jan 2000 23:23:38 -0500 (EST)
From: WThomas40@aol.com
Message-ID: <51.33874d.25b2a1c9@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 23:23:37 EST
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Prayer Request]
To: AllenA@kochind.com, Allen@webtv.net, Anthony@aol.com, RBaynham@aol.com,
Sbreathe@sedgwick.gov, RBrown5175@aol.com, revcarter@ven-tech.com,
revcarter@ven-tech.com (Tony Carter) (Tony Carter), GDDS98@aol.com,
gerriann@swbell.net (Gerri Ann Jenkins), goldenhawk@webtv.net (Willie
Patterson)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_51.33874d.25b2a1c9_boundary"
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 20

Return-Path: <radger@kumc.edu>
Received: from  rly-yb05.mx.aol.com (rly-yb05.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.5]) by
air-yb05.mail.aol.com (v67.7) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 10:40:54 -0500
Received: from  kumc-scanout-fs.KUMC (kumc-scanout-fs.kumc.edu
[169.147.166.198]) by rly-yb05.mx.aol.com (v67.7) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jan
2000 10:40:41 1900
Received: FROM gatedo.kumc.edu BY kumc-scanout-fs.KUMC ; Sat Jan 15 09:40:26
2000 -0600
Received: from KUMC-GATEWAY-DOMAIN-Message_Server by gatedo.kumc.edu with
Novell_GroupWise;  of, 15 ssa 2000 09:40:38 -0600
Message-Id: <s8804096.087@gatedo.kumc.edu>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.2.1
Date:  of, 15 ssa 2000 09:40:34 -0600
From: "Roy Adger" <radger@kumc.edu>
To: <Artholland@aol.com>, <rla2330@aol.com>, <wthomas40@aol.com>,
<lucy.j.adger@boeing.com>, <greeneyes_me@hotmail.com>,        "Eric Garrett"
<rrtt.net.acninc@kumc.edu>, <b_rnard@yahoo.com>,
<lil_bear_26@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Prayer Request]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Subject: Fwd: Prayer Request

   When you receive this e-mail just recite the following prayer.
That's all you have to do.  There is nothing attached.  This is the power of
prayer at work.  Just send this to (7) people and see what happens on the
seventh day.

      Do not break this, please.  There is no cost, but lots of rewards.
Let's continue to pray for one another.

      PRAYER::
      May today there be peace within you.  May you trust God that you are
exactly where you are meant to be.  May you not forget the infinite
possibilities that are born of faith.  May you use those gifts that you have
received, and pass on the love that has been given to you.  May you be
content knowing that you are a child of God.  Let His presence settle into
your bones, and allow your soul the freedom to sing, dance, and to bask in
the sun.  It is there for each and every one of you

Amen

Send this to (7) or more people and witness the awesome power of prayer.


Hey buddy.  Please allocate the followin deals to 0 for the 9th only.  My mistake and I will owe you for life.

deal 720977, 720959, and 720986


Attached is the script revised w/Mark Taylor's comments.


what is shawn's cell phone number?  he was supposed to stay at my place last
night and he didn't show up.


Hi Kathleen,

I left a stack of initialled docs on the appointed chair in my office.  If
you will email me Janet's telephone number, I will call and leave a voice
mail about you bringing her the docs to sign.

Thanks,

Kay


Max

Please create a manual invoice to MCV for the following item

Delivery Period Mar-02
Deal #332163
Contract 96001636
Volume 5000 x 31 days = 155,000
Price  $2.46
Pipeline  PEPL.
Location  Anadarko Pool.

The total amount should be $381,300.00.  Let me know if I missed something.

The Panhandle item for March 2002 is pathed but it's not passing through to settlements.  I'm not sure who to call about this.

Louis, this is Phil and I have come up with on the A/R balance.  Now this doesn't mean that we have sent out everything - its always possible that an invoice was never created even though everything looks ok in the trading and scheduling systems.  Our March 2002 Panhandle item is a good example.

Amount			Comment
$1,058,352.31		A/R Balance as of 5/9/02

   $472,171.50		April 2002 activity

     $26,143.85		This is part of the $381,300.00 manual invoice that Max will send out.  I believe MCV has agreed to pay this but only after we bill them.
     $17,942.80		Incorrect pricing for March 2002
   $384,975.00		MCV's replacement cost for MCV II that we did not serve in March 2002.  Ed needs to decide if MCV has the right to do this.  MCV
			support for this and the replacement prices seem reasonable.
   $429,061.65		1 To 30 day outstanding receivables

     $39,694.20		31 to 60 day outstanding receivables.  Pricing discrepancies for Feb 2002 production. We agree with MCV's pricing.

   $117,425.00		Remaining A/R balance after taking out the Current, 1 To 30, and 31 To 60 day aging items.


Karen,

I have in hand the Ledford agreement.  My only comment is that on its face it
does not appear to limit the Ledford's to the relief described (no
sole/exclusive remedy clause).  Does that occur by operation of law in
Illinois?

Thank you for your assistance.

Kay


Congratulations and best wishes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary.Hain@enron.com [mailto:Mary.Hain@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 10:36 AM
To: David_Aamodt@pgn.com; dapnucc@teleport.com; dick@pnucc.org;
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com; Frank_Afranji@pgn.com;
raa@vnf.com; Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; ajaldrich@snopud.com;
Jeff.Alexander@enron.com; Al.Alexanderson@enron.com;
Keonee.Almaida@enron.com; hollis.alpert@ferc.fed.us;
Brenda.Anderson@enron.com; angles@howry.com; Alan.B.Aronowitz@enron.com;
gdb@vnf.com; npbaker@bpa.gov; ellen@tca-us.com; paulb@citizenspower.com;
paulb@citizenspower.com; garybarbour@email.msn.com;
jbartus@cammckenna.com; glynda.becker@mail.house.gov;
Samuel.Behrends@enron.com; bbennett@bpa.gov; sberman@hewm.com;
ramsen.betfarhad@mail.house.gov; KBILAS@SKADDEN.COM; sbooye@SKADDEN.COM;
raymond.r.boyce@state.or.us; tbradley@bracepatt.com;
scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com; sbrose@steptoe.com;
sbuchheit@bracepatt.com; alanb@wutc.wa.gov; Jim.Byrne@enron.com;
vergil.cabasco@mail.house.gov; johncameron@dwt.com;
Doug.Carmichael@enron.com; Ed.Cassidy@enron.com; ajchambe@llgm.com;
Melissa.Chiechi@enron.com; elchristensen@snopud.com;
kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us; rcloward@avistacorp.com;
david_cohen@rniinc.com; Bill.Comish@enron.com;
Victor.Contract@enron.com; powerlac@aol.com;
Frederick.Coolbroth@enron.com; michaelcorrigan@bchydro.bc.ca;
kcorum@nwppc.org; KCurry@bracepatt.com; wcurry@enron.com;
gdahlke@paine-hamblen.com; kadaly@mcimail.com; mday@gmssr.com;
dearing@chelanpud.org; tdeboer@paine-hamblen.com; Tom_Delaney@enron.com;
sdleonard@earthlink.net; dldorrell@stoel.com; Mary.Doyle@enron.com;
Jay.Dudley@enron.com; mce2280@idahopower.com;
michaelearly@earthlink.net; Katherine.Edwards@enron.com;
rle@givenspursley.com; imaxtrans@aol.com; Chris.Elliott@enron.com;
sandra.elliott@ferc.fed.us; kerwin@ect.enron.com; dezickson@mwe.com;
Jim.Fallon@enron.com; fallonr@howrey.com; Elias.Farrah@enron.com;
Michele_Farrell@pgn.com; dfaulk@puget.com; gfergus@brobeck.com;
Willard.Fields@enron.com; sfisher@avistaenergy.com; pfox@bracepatt.com;
Pat.Franklin@enron.com; John.Frazzell@enron.com; ericf@prestongates.com;
don.furman@pacificorp.com; segfurst@bpa.gov; Jackie.Gallagher@enron.com;
craiggannett@dwt.com; Alvaro.Garcia@enron.com; sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com;
wgibson@nwppc.org; ggilbert@ci.tacoma.wa.us; Pat.Gilman@enron.com;
Alex.Goldberg@enron.com; jlgreene@energyadvocates.com;
Chris_Groener@mail.house.gov; Mary.Groggin@enron.com;
Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com; Stephen.Hall@enron.com;
steve.c.hall@enron.com; Leo.Hamblin@enron.com; whannaford@nwppc.org;
jim.harding@ci.seattle.wa.us; rhardy@hardyenergy.com; kharri@puget.com;
Steve_Hawke@pgn.com; dhawkins@caiso.com; marc.hellman@state.or.us;
Scott.Helyer@enron.com; mhenry@bracepatt.com; dwmp@teleport.com;
rhornby@tca-us.com; mhornst@aol.com; dhuard@jmbm.com;
Marlene.Huntsinger@pgn.com; cfi1@tca-us.com;
Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; pljacklin@stoel.com; montrey@aol.com;
danj@cfmdc.com; kgjohnson@bpa.gov; ljohnson@pwrteam.com;
Karen.E.Jones@enron.com; mkanner@kannerandassoc.com;
karid@perkinscoie.com; pkaufma@ect.enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com;
Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com; Devon Kehoe; James.Keller@enron.com;
Joe.Kelliher@mail.house.gov; kkennedy@bdbc.com; Rick.Kessler@enron.com;
rdking@bpa.gov; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com;
rsk@schwabe.com; gwilliams8@austin.rr.com; John.Klauberg@enron.com;
Holli.Krebs@enron.com; ekrogh@wiredweb.com; blafferty@avistacorp.com;
wdlamb@bpa.gov; John.Lamb@enron.com; Therese.Lamb@enron.com;
srlarson@bpa.gov; Cindy_Tatham@co.washington.or.us;
zora.lazic@bchydro.com; kaleathley@bpa.gov; pamela_lesh@pgn.com;
Debi.LeVine@enron.com; lcg@europa.com; doug.little@powerex.com;
Robert.Loeffler@enron.com; Chris.Long@enron.com; sjlong@bpa.gov;
rlopezv@conet.com.mx; david_lucio@iep.illinova.com;
king.lum@bchydro.bc.ca; kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com;
Mark.Maehr@enron.com; Randal.T.Maffett@enron.com;
John.Malowney@enron.com; Sueyen.Mao@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com;
Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Lee.Martin@enron.com; maurw@perkinscoie.com;
Wayne.Mays@enron.com; Michael.McCall@enron.com;
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Travis.McCullough@enron.com;
Michael.McDonald@enron.com; brugen@erols.com; mckinley@wpuda.org;
mcm@vnf.com; mcnichol@wapa.com; shauna@pnucc.org;
Maureen.McVicker@enron.com; pmeringolo@brobeck.com; demetcalf@bpa.gov;
cemeyer@bpa.gov; jmilegich@sppc.com; fred_miller@pgn.com;
Jeffrey.Miller@enron.com; jerry.miller@pacificorp.com;
Laura.Miller@enron.com; scott.miller@ferc.fed.us; Bill.Miner@enron.com;
phil_moeller@gorton.senate.gov; pmohler@hewm.com; emoler@velaw.com;
nkmorgado@bpa.gov; Mike@tonkon.com; krmoxness@bpa.gov;
mmps@millcreeklaw.com; pmurphy@mbllp.com; terrym@millcreeklaw.com;
bmurtha@acy.sunint.com; Rich.Nassief@enron.com; tod@mgninc.com;
Douglas_Nichols@pgn.com; Patty.Nichols@enron.com;
Christi.Nicolay@enron.com; tmnoguchi@bpa.gov; darcy@tonkon.com;
Sarah.Novasel@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
Tom.O'Donnell@enron.com; PObenchain@idahopower.com; Pegy.Olds@enron.com;
Carol.Opatrny@enron.com; tpaine@avistacorp.com; Dave.Parquet@enron.com;
bpascoe@mtpower.com; afpaschke@bpa.gov; ccperigo@bpa.gov;
wlpernas@stoel.com; lpeters@pacifier.com; jill@pnucc.org;
Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com; npickover@bracepatt.com;
Phillip.Platter@enron.com; Alfred.Pollard@enron.com;
Walt.Pollock@enron.com; gporter@sppc.com; Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com;
jquint@puget.com; arlene.ragozin@ci.seattle.wa.us; maraschio@bpa.gov;
Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com; Scott.Rasmussen@enron.com;
Bobby.Reeves@enron.com; preiten@pngc.com; reyna2r@kochind.com;
shellyr@pacifier.com; Jeff.Richter@enron.com; raroach@bpa.gov;
atrodrigues@bpa.gov; rarogers@bpa.gov; peterroi@erols.com;
Rothfelder@rlo-law.com; Richard.Sanders@enron.com; jsaven@pacifier.com;
Michael.Schilmoeller@enron.com; jschlect@avistacorp.com;
Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com; Diana.Scholtes@enron.com;
Roger.Seifert@enron.com; Cara.Semperger@enron.com;
asettanni@bracepatt.com; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; vsharp@enron.com;
msmith1@enron.com; Joshua.Sheinkman@enron.com; jshurts@nwppc.org;
Sid@enron.com; msizer@ci.tacoma.wa.us; slavens.paula@deps.ppl.com;
small@wrightlaw.com; small@wrightlaw.com; douglas.smith@ferc.fed.us;
Mike.Smith@enron.com; Roger.Smith@enron.com; Larry.Soderquist@enron.com;
Harvey.Spigal@enron.com; mstauffer@mtpower.com;
James.D.Steffes@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
mestewardpsedc@worldnet.att.net; JKStier@bpa.gov;
rbstrong@paine-hamblen.com; DASwanstrom@Verner.com;
Mike.Swerzbin@enron.com; tabors@tca-us.com; Ron.Tapscott@enron.com;
James.K.Tarpey@enron.com; Jake.Thomas@enron.com;
ryan_thomas@burns.senate.gov; jrt2058@idahopower.com
Subject: I'm Leaving Enron

        maryann@pnucc.org, mtierney@sempra.com, robin_tompkins@pgn.com,
        Ann.Tumlinson@enron.com, AW.Turner@enron.com,
Sheila.Tweed@enron.com,
        Lisa.Urick@enron.com, rvermeers@avistacorp.com,
        Frank.W.Vickers@enron.com, John.Walley@enron.com,
        kristiwallis@sprintmail.com, walshl@howrey.com, swalton@enron.com,
        Steve.Walton@enron.com, kaward@bpa.gov, Kim.Ward@enron.com,
        Carol.Wardell@enron.com, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, sawatson@bpa.gov,
        judy.welch@NWPP.ORG, 211-6155@mcimail.com, Kwenzel@zzz.com,
        cwestadt@sppc.com, Brian.Whalen@enron.com, Bill.Williams@enron.com,
        klwmtp@worldnet.att.net, lyn_williams@pgn.com, Greg.Wolfe@enron.com,
        Vickie.Wolk-Laniewski@enron.com, Ed.Wood@enron.com, mwood@stoel.com,
        Steve.Wright@enron.com, Teresa.L.Wright@enron.com, WSCC@enron.com,
        Charles.Yeung@enron.com, Christian.Yoder@enron.com,
        Steven.J.Kean@enron.com, Steve.Kean@enron.com,
        Travel.in.the.Park@enron.com, D.Brett.Hunsucker@enron.com,
        Carla.Hoffman@enron.com, Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com,
        Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com, Donna.Fulton@enron.com,
Roger.Fragua@enron.com,
        James.B.Fallon@enron.com, Michael.Etringer@enron.com,
        Terry.W.Donovan@enron.com, Stacy.Dickson@enron.com,
        Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com, Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com,
        Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, Sean.Crandall@enron.com,
Tom.Briggs@enron.com,
        t.briggs@enron.com, Stacey.Bolton@enron.com, dbenevid@enron.com,
        dbenevid@enron.com, Tim.Belden@enron.com, Robert.Badeer@enron.com,
        Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com, Alan.Comnes@enron.com,
Lysa.Akin@enron.com,
        Portland.West.Desk@enron.com, assad@elektro.com.br,
        Alan.Comnes@enron.com, Alberto.Levy@enron.com,
Aleck.Dadson@enron.com,
        Allison.Navin@enron.com, Amy.Fabian@enron.com,
        Barbara.A.Hueter@enron.com, Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com,
        Bill.Moore@enron.com, cristinah@elektro.com.br,
        Carlos.Gustavo.Azevedo@enron.com, Carmen.Perez@enron.com,
        Carolyn.Cooney@enron.com, Charles.Yeung@enron.com,
        Chauncey.Hood@enron.com, Chris.Long@enron.com,
        Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com, Cynthia.Sandherr@enron.com,
        Damon.Harvey@enron.com, Dan.Staines@enron.com,
        Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com, Dave.Mangskau@enron.com,
        Donald.Lassere@enron.com, Donna.Fulton@enron.com,
        Eidy.Catala@enron.com, Elizabeth.Linnell@enron.com,
        Frank.Rishe@enron.com, Geriann.Warner@enron.com,
        Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com, Gisele.S.Braz@enron.com,
        Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com, Guillermo.Canovas@enron.com,
        Harry.Kingerski@enron.com, Howard.Fromer@enron.com,
        James.D.Steffes@enron.com, Janine.Migden@enron.com,
        Javier.Pantoja@enron.com, Jean.R.Dressler@enron.com,
        Jean.Ryall@enron.com, Jeff.Brown@enron.com, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com,
        Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com, Joao.Paixao@enron.com,
Joe.Allen@enron.com,
        Joe.Connor@enron.com, Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com, Joe.Hillings@enron.com,
        Jose.Bestard@enron.com, Joseph.Alamo@enron.com,
        Kathleen.Sullivan@enron.com, Kerry.Stroup@enron.com,
        Kikumi.Kishigami@enron.com, Kirsten.Bellas@enron.com,
        Lara.Leibman@enron.com, Laurie.Knight@enron.com,
        Leslie.Lawner@enron.com, Linda.J.Noske@enron.com,
        Linda.Robertson@enron.com, Lindsay.Meade@enron.com,
        Lisa.Yoho@enron.com, Lora.Sullivan@enron.com, Luiz.Maurer@enron.com,
        Lysa.Akin@enron.com, Marchris.Robinson@enron.com,
        Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com, Marcie.Milner@enron.com,
        Mary.Hain@enron.com, Maureen.McVicker@enron.com,
        Melinda.Pharms@enron.com, Michelle.Belzak@enron.com,
        Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com, Nancy.Hetrick@enron.com,
        Patrick.Keene@enron.com, Ray.Alvarez@enron.com,
        Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com, Ricardo.Charvel@enron.com,
        Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com, Richard.Shapiro@enron.com,
        Robert.Frank@enron.com, Robert.Hemstock@enron.com,
        Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com, Robin.Kittel@enron.com,
        Ron.McNamara@enron.com, rboston@enron.com, Rubena.Buerger@enron.com,
        Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com, Sarah.Novosel@enron.com,
        Scott.Bolton@enron.com, Sergio.Assad@enron.com,
Stella.Chan@enron.com,
        Stephen.D.Burns@enron.com, Steve.Montovano@enron.com,
        Steve.Walton@enron.com, Steven.J.Kean@enron.com, Sue.Nord@enron.com,
        Susan.J.Mara@enron.com, Susan.M.Landwehr@enron.com,
        Terri.Miller@enron.com, Thane.Twiggs@enron.com,
Tom.Briggs@enron.com,
        Tom.Chapman@enron.com, Tom.Delaney@enron.com, Tom.Hoatson@enron.com,
        Tracy.Cooper@enron.com, Valeria.Lima@enron.com,
Vinio.Floris@enron.com,
        Xi.Xi@enron.com, Steven.J.Kean@enron.com, Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com,
        Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com, Sarah.Novosel@enron.com,
        Robert.Frank@enron.com, Lara.Leibman@enron.com,
        Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com, Richard.Shapiro@enron.com,
        Leslie.Lawner@enron.com, Paul.Kaufman@enron.com,
        Aleck.Dadson@enron.com, Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com,
        Howard.Fromer@enron.com, Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com, rboston@enron.com,
        Janine.Migden@enron.com, Christie.Patrick@enron.com,
        Jane.Wilson@enron.com, Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com,
        kmagruder@newpower.com, scovino@newpower.com,
Rebecca.Carter@enron.com,
        Shelley.Corman@enron.com, Janet.Butler@enron.com,
        Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com, Brad.Richter@enron.com,
Greg.Piper@enron.com,
        Kevin.McGowan@enron.com, Kim.Ward@enron.com, Leslie.Reeves@enron.com
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:24:18 -0800
Message-ID: <OFCFA12BE4.1A65CFD4-ON88256A0F.00666A9C@enron.com>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at
 03/23/2001 12:29:04 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I am going to be the Senior Regulatory Counsel at ISO New England starting
on April 9, 2001.   My last day in the Portland area will be March 31,
2001.  I enjoyed working with you and wish you the best of everything.  My
new address will be:

Mary Hain
Senior Regulatory Counsel
ISO New England Inc.
One Sullivan Road
Holyoke, MA  01040-2841
(413) 535-4000
mhain@ISO-NE.com


-----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Subject:

Hi:  Could you send me a copy of the Trustee letter?  Email would be great;
otherwise, fax is 415.782.7854.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


Please see the attached documents.


Soaring Electric Use More Fiction Than Fact
Chronicle investigation finds power companies manipulate data to excuse their
towering rates Christian Berthelsen, Scott Winokur, Chronicle Staff Writers
Sunday, March 11, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/11/M
N213155.DTL

Power companies say it so often, and with such certainty, that it has become
a virtual mantra: "Skyrocketing" energy use by Californians is a root cause
of the state's power crisis, and justification for surging electricity
prices.
But a computer analysis of electricity usage data by The Chronicle reveals
that the mantra is a myth -- that overall growth in electricity demand hasn't
been nearly as great as the industry portrays it.
The industry has painted the summer of 2000 as the equivalent of a 100-year
storm in meteorology -- an event so powerful and unexpected that the existing
infrastructure was devastated by its force.
The statistics show that 2000, taken in total, was nothing of the sort.
Moreover, two independent state agencies' assessments of California's power
plant capacity appear to show that the growth should have been easily
accommodated.
The companies have defended their practice of increasingly taking power-
generation plants out of service by arguing that heavy demand and consequent
plant usage necessitated major, time-consuming repairs.
"The claims that demand growth is rampant and that it was totally unexpected
and due to the Internet economy, to Silicon Valley, or server farms,
or people recharging cell phones -- that's bogus," said Tom Kelly, assistant
executive director of the California Energy Commission. "About as bogus as
you can get."
The Chronicle's findings are based on data collected by the California
Independent System Operator, a manager of the state's electricity grid. They
show:
-- Total electricity consumption in California increased only 4.75 percent in
2000 from 1999, a sharp contrast to claims of industry representatives, who
have repeatedly relied on isolated, loose or selective comparisons that make
growth appear as high as 20 percent. In fact, the single greatest hour of
electricity usage in 2000 was actually lower than any peak demand period in
1999 or 1998.
-- Average peak demand -- the average of the highest hour of electricity
usage for each day -- increased only 4.79 percent from 1999 to 2000. Even
during the months of May to September in 2000, when the greatest spikes in
electricity usage occur, demand growth was only 8.31 percent higher than the
same period the year before.
-- More than 30 days of critical power shortage warnings, so-called Stage 3
emergencies, and two days of blackouts this year occurred at times of
moderate energy use -- levels often below those at which neither warnings nor
blackouts have occurred in the past.
The findings appear to buttress suspicions that the "skyrocketing demand"
explanation for rising energy prices is a cover for what is really happening
--
that power companies have simply started charging more for an essential
commodity, regardless of whether it is in short supply.
Presented with The Chronicle's findings, Gary Ackerman, a representative for
the Western Power Trading Forum, a trade group representing power companies,
said the calculations support the industry position that electricity demand
is growing strong.
"That's pretty healthy growth for California as opposed to the long-term
historical average, which is close to 2 percent," he said. "To me, that's
really strong growth."
Energy demand is certainly on the rise in California -- growth of more than 4
percent is still double what was projected -- and the state has obviously
fallen behind in building power plants.
Even though a recent study found California ranked 47th out of the 50 states
in per-capita energy consumption, the surging demand explanation has become
so accepted that leading officials accept it as gospel. Gov. Gray Davis has
made energy conservation -- 10 percent, at that -- a centerpiece of his
efforts to solve the crisis.
"Energy use is growing," said state Sen. John Burton, D-San Francisco, citing
the growth of Silicon Valley and high-tech operations statewide. "There's
been tremendous growth, whether manufacturing or high tech -- cell phones,
faxes, whatever. The stuff is growing."
Yet the energy industry has been steadfast in its insistence that the
consumer is largely to blame. In testimony and submissions to government
bodies considering prescriptions for the crisis, energy demand growth has
consistently been overstated.
Joe Bob Perkins, the chief operating officer of Houston-based Reliant Energy
Inc., told the U.S. Senate in January that California's growing economy and
high summer temperatures caused electricity use to "surge dramatically" -- a
demand growth of 13 percent.
Richard Wheatley, a spokesman for Reliant, said Perkins' testimony was based
on estimates by the federal Energy Information Administration of monthly
retail electricity sales.
"We do stand by that," Wheatley said. "Unfortunately, it does not track with
ISO data."
The industry-backed Edison Electric Institute said in a report that
electricity demand grew by anywhere from 5 percent to 21 percent during the
spring of 2000, compared with the same period a year earlier.
Russell Tucker, an economist for the institute, said the group's figures were
derived by identifying the single highest hour of electricity demand for each
spring month of 1999 and 2000 and comparing them, finding the May peak rose
21 percent.
Granted, the state Energy Commission uses the same model to determine whether
California has enough plant capacity to meet demand. But the presentation
makes it appear that overall demand, not just the absolute peak, is growing
by 21 percent. When the peak of each day is averaged and compared from year
to year, May's figure was much lower: 12.79 percent.
Also, nowhere did Edison's report note that the peak hour of 2000, a load of
43,784 megawatts on Aug. 16, was actually lower than the peak hours of either
of the previous two years -- 45,884 on July 12, 1999, or 44,406 on Sept.
1, 1998.
The Chronicle analysis of average peak demand showed that no month last year
grew more than June's 15.34 percent, though no blackouts occurred in that
month. May and June were the only months when demand growth exceeded 10
percent, the analysis showed. Most months recorded 4 percent or 5 percent,
and some -- such as September -- were less than 3 percent.
Two months, October and December, had demand levels lower than the year
before -- 4.22 percent less for October, 1.46 percent lower for December.
Mike Florio, a consumer lawyer and board member of the ISO, said that even
growth of less than 5 percent from 1999 to 2000 would seem overstated, since
1999 was a relatively mild weather year and 2000 was a much hotter one. "You
are quite right," Florio said. " 'Skyrocketing' demand is a myth."
MARKET MANIPULATION?
Consumer representatives and some politicians have long suspected that,
rather than dire imbalances between supply and demand, market manipulation is
behind the crisis.
Generators and power marketers adamantly deny this, saying they have done
everything they could to keep the lights on. They say they ran aging,
decrepit plants at higher-than-normal levels last summer to accommodate what
they described as unprecedented demand. They also say that, at great expense,
they delayed much-needed maintenance in order to keep the power flowing.
Their claims have received some support from the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, which said in a report last month that it found no evidence power
companies were using maintenance schedules to manipulate supply. The report,
however, was heavily qualified by the FERC, which said it did not investigate
other forms of manipulation. Moreover, the agency acknowledged that the bulk
of its investigation was conducted by simply calling power plants and
questioning them over the telephone.
The supply side of the energy equation is harder to penetrate, in part
because supply data are confidential. Thus, the question of how blackouts
could have occurred at such low levels of demand in January is hard to
answer. What is clear is that, at times, during the crisis this year, as much
as 12, 000 megawatts of electricity supply have been unavailable for use,
mostly because of unplanned plant outages -- about four times the level
anticipated by the ISO.
Power companies say the old plants they bought were not capable of producing
to the levels sketched out by the ISO and the Energy Commission, and that
everything from low water conditions, emissions limitations and high
temperatures last year caused less energy to be available than was
anticipated.
But others suggest that what began as a shortage caused by a withholding of
supply to drive up price has turned into one caused by withholdings out of
fear of not being paid.
What did go up, unquestionably, were wholesale electricity prices.
While average electricity usage during the heaviest hours last year increased
by less than 5 percent, prices charged by power companies to the utilities
that deliver juice to consumers increased more than 289 percent.
In June, the cost of a megawatt hour increased more than fivefold, going from
the 1999 level of $30.53 to $170.60. In October, prices doubled over the same
period a year earlier, going from $53.47 to $111.04. And in December --
despite a 1.46 percent decline in electricity usage from the previous
December -- peak wholesale electricity prices hit $425.59. They'd been $31.88
one year before.
Then the pace of price increases began to accelerate within the last six
months of 2000. Overall, average peak usage during December was about 31,200
megawatts, about a fifth lower than it was in August. Average prices in
December? They just about doubled, to $425 a megawatt hour.
The companies' explanation for rising prices despite falling demand was that
more and more plants had to be taken offline for repairs, decreasing supply.
Even given the high number of inoperable plants, questions remain about why
the existing supply could not cover demand.
On the blackout days of Jan. 17 and 18 fewer plants were offline -- and more
electricity was available -- than on days when the state managed to squeeze
by without turning out the lights.
Even today, with Stage 3 alerts having faded away, at least temporarily,
demand levels remain more or less the same as when California was in a
constant state of emergency. Moreover, the lists of offline plants are as
long as ever.
AMPLE POWER SHOULD EXIST
The Energy Commission and the ISO have concluded that California's power
plants are capable of generating more than 45,000 megawatts of electricity.
That means that even with plant repair outages, low water levels decreasing
hydraulic generation, air-pollution rules and other environmental
constraints, the power companies should be able to accommodate all but the
most extreme spikes in demand.
According to industry data obtained by The Chronicle, the Western Systems
Coordinating Council, a government-backed trade group in Salt Lake City,
concluded California would have considerable surpluses throughout 2000,
including margins as high as 39 percent in December, based on data provided
to it by the ISO. Even under low water conditions, the ISO reported, the
state would have total power resources of 47,532 megawatts in that month. Yet
unplanned outages were far higher, and the system began to crash that month
and into this year, at far lower levels of demand.
"Clearly," Florio said, "we should not be having a shortage at 2 a.m. on
Christmas Eve, when the only person awake is Santa Claus."
Chronicle Database Editor Erin McCormick assisted in data analysis for this
report. Chronicle editorial assistant Claire Smith assisted in data
collection for this report. / E-mail Christian Berthelsen at
cberthelsen@sfchronicle.com and Scott Winokur at s
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


I was told that I will need an employee number in order to enter the hours
I've worked this week. Is this something I should have already? Please let me
know whenever you get a free moment.


CalISO filed a tariff to charge scheduling coordinators FERC's annual
charge.  The ISO should charge end users (transmission customers).  As you
know we just got FERC to rule that marketers don't have to pay the annual
charges.  Tim wants to protest.  Protests due 1/19!  Please respond ASAP.


John, I apologize for all the emails back and forth.  We had to make a
revision on the last retroactive calculation (we called in the "big gun" -
Laura Scott) and are confident that this is the definitive payment.  I've
also attached a summary that Janice prepared outlining all payments received
to date - hopefully, it will clear everything up.  Call if it requires
further explanation.  (x6724)....

USD     CAD
100,000.00 (Original Payment)  149,780.00
21,000.00 (Gross up on original)  31,453.80
9,545.07 (Retro payment)  14,296.60
17,647.40 (Adj retro re Gross up)  26,432.28
148,192.47    221,962.68


Here it is again!

-Craig W. Lipke
Citizens Energy Supply
Phone (928) 226-2243
Fax     (928) 226-2168
Cell     (928) 699-3683

*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from Citizens
Communication Co. are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.  Any other use is expressly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender immediately.
*******************************************************************


when i am married i want a girlfriend


Start Date: 1/24/02; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012422.txt


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SSCOTT5>
To: joeseph.parks@enron.com
Date: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:07:36 GMT
Subject:

Hi Joe,

I'm actually out of town today visiting family.  I just wanted to let you know that Kathy is pretty up to date on where I stand with the west curves.  What little information I do have was only obtained Wednesday afternoon, so not to much has been entered in to the file.  It appears we have quotes from at least one broker for the following days: 12/12/01-12/21/01, 12/31/01, 01/02/12.  I have talked to a few people from west-risk who are trying to track down more information.  I will forward the emails with attachments which I have recieved to yourself and feel free to grab what I have printed out from my desk (all data is simply sitting in front of my keyboard).  I have printed out all the days we currently have and attached the sheet confirming which broker provided the information and on what day.  Hope this helps.

Thanks,
Susan

Please reply back and let me know if you recieved the information as I am having some difficulty with my email.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bowler, Tim
Sent: Thu 2/14/2002 4:22 PM
To: Parks, Joe; Denetsosie, Troy; Scott, Susan M.
Cc: Considine, Keith; Barone, Michael; Considine, Keith; 'mark.allan.smith@us.pwcglobal.com'; 'eric.gronningsater@us.pwcglobal.com'
Subject: Broker quotes required for validation - West

All,

Attached is a spreadsheet of Enron's curve names for the West book.  We just need a quick status on the broker quotes you have and the ones still needed/missing.  Please review the curves against the broker data you have (including electronic files), and indicate any gaps.

Based on your reply, the Estate will purchase the missing data.  Please have this prepared by 12:00 tomorrow.

Tim Bowler

<< West Quote List.xls >>


Just a reminder that I will not be in the office on Friday, September 29.
Mary Cook (ext. 57732) will be able to handle any crises.  I'll be back in
the office on Monday.  Sara


GOOD STUFF!!!!


Responses:
1.  I'll let Kevin answer this one.  ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes.

2.  I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1.  If possible I would
like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes
through March 2001.  However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas
on TCO for April.  I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we
are buying back gas at GD - $.01.

3.  Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price?  Does Duke bill
CES directly for this?

4.  See attached worksheets.

5.  I don't know all the information on the local production yet.  The
pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing
using ENA transport).  The attached April file has a Local Production tab.
Molly Johnson is updating this information.  After she completes April, she
will recreate Jan - Mar.

6.   Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about
the individual citygate volumes.  For pricing purposes, I only care about
total daily deliveries.   It would be a problem if you were trying to take
additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and
you don't have enough capacity.  This holds true for most other pipelines as
well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ...  This would be a
better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something
specific as it comes up.  The only thing I will not allow you to do is take
gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has
discussed this with Melissa.

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Dalphon, Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Porter,
Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Questions

Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly.
Please look it over and let's talk.  The items are not prioritized in any way.

1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR
the
price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I.   The same is true for delivery
points into Michcon.   Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7
plus
the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon?   Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7
as the price index for Michcon.

2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1:
TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12.   However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes
for
these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to
Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1.  Exhibit 1 contains
projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000.   Are we required
to
do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense
with
this?  I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency
Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue.

3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are
incorrect.  The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume.  Since
the
supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy
and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend
to do a simultaneous "buy/sell"  with Enron of the volumes in excess of the
(erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume.  If you disagree, let's discuss.

4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21
(O&R),  TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please
provide
me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly
basis
for April at each of these points?   (I also need these numbers for January,
February, and March.)

5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced?

6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas
was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for
that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)?

There will undoubtedly be other questions.  I will direct them to you as they
arise.

Thanks.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317


State loses $25 million in power plays, ploys
It sold some energy for loss, gave some away
SF Gate News
October 25, 2001
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/10/25/MN182788.DTL>

Vote for public power no guarantee it will happen
Two propositions on S.F. ballot
SF Gate News
October 25, 2001
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/10/25/MN24526.DTL>

Power plant assessment to be taken over by state
Dow Jones Interactive
October 25, 2001

Ontario Electricity Market Inches Closer To Deregulation
Dow Jones Interactive
October 25, 2001

FERC to give states a role in RTO formation
Dow Jones Interactive
October 24, 2001

State loses $25 million in power plays, ploys
It sold some energy for loss, gave some away

Sacramento -- California sold electricity on a day it endured rolling blackouts and gave it away for free on another day earlier this year, according to documents that detail at least $25 million in power trading losses.

The state Department of Water Resources, which has stepped in as the power buyer for troubled utilities, said yesterday that it sold 224,871 megawatt hours of electricity during the three-month period ending in June. That represents about 1 percent of the total traded during that period.

Included were some sales for next to nothing -- or nothing at all.

On May 26, the state sold 500 megawatt hours of power for 50 cents apiece to the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. The state paid an average of $271 a megawatt hour during May.

Two days later, the state gave away 786 megawatt hours of power to a British Columbia utility.

"We may not have had a buyer," said Oscar Hidalgo, spokesman for the Department of Water Resources. "It's not a storable product."

Giving the electricity away may have actually saved the state money, he said, because power grid rules can require buyers to pay a generator not to produce power if the system doesn't need it.

Other Department of Water Resources records show that the state also sold power March 19, when 1.2 million customers statewide lost electricity in rolling blackouts for about 90 minutes.

Officials said the fact that the state had to sell power that day was a reflection of how chaotic and fast-changing the electricity supply-and-demand situation was during the height of the energy crisis.

State officials say it is normal for any energy-buying operation to have a surplus of electricity occasionally. Turning into a seller from time to time, they say, has helped the state to drive down prices and steadily lower monthly power-buying costs.

But critics say the size of the losses is proof that the state locked in too much power at above-market rates in its early forays into the electricity- buying business.

"I suspect that these (losses) are continuing and that they are continuing because (the Department of Water Resources) bought more power than we needed during the cool summer," said Assemblyman John Campbell, R-Irvine.

Vote for public power no guarantee it will happen
Two propositions on S.F. ballot

If San Francisco voters decide Nov. 6 that a public agency is a better bet to provide cheaper, more reliable power than PG&E, it will be some time before the switch is flipped.

Propositions F and I, which only set up the first steps toward public control, also face possible legal challenges from Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and other large utilities that have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars campaigning against the measures.

There is also uncertainty about the costs. Neither measure has a price tag attached.

For more than two decades in San Francisco, PG&E has lobbied City Hall vigorously and used legal maneuvers to keep public power off the ballot. But the company was thwarted in the past year by a voter-backed initiative drive and a Board of Supervisors that advocates local control over the electrical system. The move gained steam with the state energy crisis.

If San Francisco voters take the initial steps toward public power on Nov. 6, they will join more than 2,000 public jurisdictions, including Sacramento, Los Angeles and Seattle, that provide electric power to about 40 million customers, accounting for 15 percent of the demand in the United States.

Proposition I would establish a municipal utility district, or MUD, in San Francisco and neighboring Brisbane that would be governed by an elected five- member board of directors. Measure-backers included Brisbane to meet a state requirement that more than one jurisdiction in a municipal utility district.

The directors after conducting a feasibility study, could decide to provide electricity directly to residents and businesses.

They then could use eminent domain to take over the electrical generation and distribution lines from PG&E and the San Francisco-owned Hetch Hetchy Water and Power agency.

The other measure, Proposition F, would set up a Water and Power Agency for San Francisco only. The agency would be governed by an elected seven-member board of directors and would replace the mayor-appointed Public Utilities Commission. The PUC currently provides electricity to municipal operations and water and sewer service to homes and businesses.

Like the MUD called for in Proposition I, the agency would have to conduct a feasibility study to review the costs and benefits of public power.

Then, with the consent of the Board of Supervisors, the agency could take over PG&E's electricity system. No such board consent would be needed under Proposition I. The agency also would have the ability to issue revenue bonds under $100 million without approval by supervisors or voters. Anything over that amount would be subject to a referendum.

The Prop. F plan is also designed to promote conservation efforts and renewable energy.

Props. F and I both rely on elected directors, who ultimately will decide whether to create a public power system.

The board would also set the rates and have control over everything from the terms for buying electricity to whether to use more renewable energy sources, such as wind, hydroelectric and solar power.

If both measures pass, Prop. I will take priority. Supervisors placed Prop. F on the ballot as a backup -- one they believe could better withstand the expected legal challenges from PG&E.

The utility waged a 23-year battle to beat back public power in Sacramento - - and eventually lost.

Opponents of the S.F. public power effort, with PG&E at the lead, already have spent more than $650,000 on the campaigns against the measures with more money expected in the coming weeks. AT&T and Pacific Bell also have been big contributors, fearful that the MUD directors will use state laws to take over the phone and communications utilities in San Francisco, as well.

Public power critics say there are too many unknowns in the proposals, chief among them the cost.

City Controller Ed Harrington noted that a disputed 1997 study commissioned by the San Francisco PUC estimated the value of PG&E's distribution system at $800 million. Other estimates have ranged from $300 million to $1 billion.

"A lot of people are not happy with PG&E. But neither of these measures can guarantee that they're going to solve the state's power problem, or provide us better, more reliable or cheaper service," said Jim Mathias, vice president of public affairs for the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce. "The unknown could be worse."

Proponents, however, say a public power system answers to voters and ratepayers, not corporate shareholders. Historically, such public power systems have had lower rates.

"The only unknowns are ephemeral because we've seen through the Sacramento MUD, the Alameda MUD and the Los Angeles public power authority that rates are lower and service is better," said Board of Supervisors President Tom Ammiano, a public power advocate.

  _____

THE MUD MEASURES

San Francisco voters face two public power measures on the Nov. 6 ballot. .

-- PROPOSITION F

Placed on the ballot by the Board of Supervisors, the measure would:

-- Abolish San Francisco's Public Utilities Commission and replace it with a Municipal Water and Power Agency. The agency would be governed by an elected seven-member board of directors.

-- Authorize the agency to take over the existing Hetch Hetchy Water and Power system, which is now operated by the city PUC.

-- Order a feasibility study to determine the costs and benefits of providing public power to San Francisco consumers.

-- Operate with the goal of ending Pacific Gas and Electric Co.'s control of electricity distribution in San Francisco and create a public power system that would sell electricity directly to residents and businesses. It also would continue to provide water and sewer service, as the local PUC has.

-- Allow the agency to issue revenue bonds without approval by the Board of Supervisors or voters. Any bond issue of more than $100 million would be subject to referendum.

-- Require the new agency to maintain some ties to City Hall. For example, the Board of Supervisors would have to approve the use of eminent domain to take over PG&E's distribution lines and generation facilities.

.

-- PROPOSITION I

Placed on the ballot by initiative, the measure would:

-- Establish a Municipal Utility District for both San Francisco and Brisbane. The district would be run by an elected five-member board of directors. Candidates for the director posts also are on the Nov. 6 ballot.

-- Give directors the authority to determine whether to take over PG&E's electrical and distribution system in San Francisco, as well as the Hetch Hetchy system, in order to provide publicly owned power directly to ratepayers.

Requires a feasibility study of such an action. Subsequent voter approval of specific projects probably would be required.

-- Allow the district to investigate whether it should provide water, transportation, garbage collection, telephone, communications and sewer services, as allowed by state law governing municipal utility districts.

-- Give the MUD power as a state agency, independent of the Brisbane and San Francisco local governments, allow the directors to undertake eminent domain proceedings and provide authority to issue revenue bonds.

Power plant assessment to be taken over by state

Over protests from cities that fear a sharp loss in revenue, the state Board of Equalization voted yesterday to take over the appraisal of power generators but postponed doing so for one year.

The delay until Jan. 1, 2003, is designed to give the Legislature time to fix what opponents call a "fatal flaw" in the plan.

Under the old rule, property tax revenue from power plants was assessed by the counties, with the property tax going to the redevelopment agencies in the city the plant is situated. The board changed that so that the state now assesses the plant, spreading the money out across the county.

That means big losses for a city such as Pittsburg, which has been fighting the plan. The city -- which has two new power plants -- expected $10 million in property tax revenue. With the changes, that will be reduced to just $400,000, said John Knox, an attorney hired by the city.

Pittsburg Vice Mayor Frank Aiello said the property tax revenue was one reason the city agreed to have the plants built in its community.

"You'll see more and more power plants not being sited," he told the board. "There will be an even bigger energy crisis."

He said the move will have a "devastating effect" on the city's redevelopment agency.

Supporters of the plan believe power generators have gotten off too easy under local assessors. That is because counties are barred from increasing assessments more than 2 percent a year under Proposition 13.

Ontario Electricity Market Inches Closer To Deregulation

CALGARY -(Dow Jones)- The province of Ontario opened another door to electric deregulation Wednesday, issuing tough new emission standards for industry and lifting a two-year moratorium on the sale of provincially owned coal-fired generation plants.

Loosening Ontario Power Generation's hold on the bulk of the province's power plants is critical to launching an electricity market slated to open by May 2002 - after three delays in as many years.

"Putting additional generation assets in the hands of competition to OPG is one of the primary objectives," said John Dalton, director at Navigant Consulting Inc. in Toronto.

The utility has five coal-fired power plants, including the 4,000-megawatt Naticoke and 1,975-MW Lambton stations where the government has accepted OPG installing selective catalytic reduction units to cut down smog, rather than converting to other fuels.

"Right now, without putting these generation assets under the control of competition, essentially we don't have a power market, we have a regulatory scheme," Dalton said.

Sale of the plants had been put on hold until the environment ministry finalized its anti-pollution regulations. The new rules issued Wednesday by Environment Minister Elizabeth Witmer will cap emissions by fossil fuel-burning generation stations starting Jan. 1, and will be fully implemented by 2007.

Under the government's plan for deregulation, OPG must sell or lease about 4,00 MW of non-nuclear power within 42 months of market opening. The utility owns 9,700 MW of fossil-fuel capacity, 8,728 MW of nuclear power and 7,309 MW of hydroelectric power.

"Lifting the moratorium goes a long way toward OPG moving quickly to its decontrol program, and preparing for an open market," OPG spokesman John Earl said

This latest move has the industry optimistic that the provincial government could open electricity markets by early rather than late spring.

"We're working on being ready for March 1," an industry source told Dow Jones Newswires. "There will be lots of supply on the market because the economy is slower than anticipated and demand is down. That's what the government wants, lots of supply and some choice for consumers."

A separate regulation finalized Wednesday ordered OPG's aging Lakeview plant to stop burning coal by 2005.

The edict gave new life to the four units that faced being completely shut down, but still doesn't make them that attractive to buyers, Dalton said.

Lakeview operates about 30% of the year at a lower fuel cost than cleaner-burning natural gas plants. Converting to an alternative fuel will increase cost on units that are last on the fossil fuel plant list to be dispatched - meaning they will run even fewer hours and at lower rates.

FERC to give states a role in RTO formation

WASHINGTON, Oct 24 (Reuters) - U.S. federal energy regulators on Wednesday pledged to create a new body to cooperate with state officials on the planning of regional transmission grid combinations after complaints that they were left out of the process.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which oversees the country's power grid operators, has ordered utilities in the Southeast, Northeast, Midwest and West to combine their assets into a handful of regional transmission organizations (RTOs) by the end of the year.

The agency has pushed hard to create the RTOs to avoid a repeat of the power crisis in California last winter, in which the antiquated U.S. grid prevented more power from flowing into the state.

FERC commissioners acknowledged on Wednesday that some changes were needed to address criticism from state utilities regulators that they were left out of the RTO rule-making process.

STATES GET SEAT AT THE TABLE

FERC Commissioner Nora Mead Brownell, a former Pennsylvania regulatory official, proposed creating a regional council that would share authority between FERC and states on setting RTO policies.

Citing states' confusion about FERC's direction and inconsistent internal agency communication, Brownell, in a memo to commissioners, said the council "can provide the necessary flexibility that we will likely need moving forward to RTO formation."

The request was made by David Svanda, commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission, on behalf of six other Midwest states at FERC's workshop on RTOs last week.

The move is "a ceding of jurisdiction ... to state regulators for us to co-govern the process with them," FERC Chairman Pat Wood told reporters after the meeting. Wood previously headed Texas' state utility regulatory agency.

Of state commissions, Wood said "they need to be invited with a nice seat at the table, not just standing at the door taking tickets."

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS PROMISED

FERC also promised to prepare a formal cost-benefit analysis of RTOs for states and consumers, after some states raised concerns that the costs did not justify the benefits. The agency did not say when the study would be completed.

On Tuesday, the New York Independent System Operator (ISO) released its own cost-benefit study, which asserted the creation of a large Northeastern RTO could boost consumer power bills by some $90 million a year.

The non-profit New York ISO would also be put out of business by a regional for-profit RTO.

However, a separate study issued last month by energy firm Mirant Corp , a supporter of RTOs, concluded that a Northeastern RTO would save consumers $440 million annually.

At the meeting, FERC commissioners heard staff presentations on RTO development progress in the Southeast, Northeast and Midwest.

But few new details emerged on the ultimate direction FERC will take in guiding utilities.

Wood said that more specifics would be available at the next meeting on Nov. 7, just a month ahead of FERC's Dec. 15 deadline for RTO membership.

Under FERC's plan, the RTOs would be for-profit groups in the U.S. Northeast, Midwest, Southeast and West. Each region would combine public utility transmission facilities to provide open access, more reliable power and lower rates for consumers.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 05:10 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	11/14/2000 04:22 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: : Presidential Ballots for Florida

---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Moran/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 04:19 PM
---------------------------

From:  Tom Moran
11/10/2000 01:11 PM

To: tmoran1961@aol.com
cc:
Subject: FW: : Presidential Ballots for Florida

 - DemBallot.gif
 - Floridaballot.jpg
 - MORONS1.GIF


I will call you at 3 pm (Houston time) which is 5 pm (Sao Paulo time).
Please confirm.  Regards.  Sara


Please forward to Ralph Reed
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 1:16 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Shapiro, Richard; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Kean, Steven J.; Steffes, James D.; Guerrero, Janel; 'ken@kdscommunications.com'
Subject:	FW: Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm

fyi...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sandra Yamane <SYamane@marathon-com.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Sandra+20Yamane+20+3CSYamane+40marathon-com+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:29 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:	Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm

 <<Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm>>

 - Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm


IM-CENT-MID
INTRA-CNT-GULF
INTRA-NGPL-STRG
INTRA-CNT-MKT
INTRA-CNT-MKT2
INTRA-CNT-TRANS
INTRA-PARKLOAN
INTRA-GD-TRANS
INTRA-CENTRAL
INTRA-CNT-NEW


No. I already have plans that I can not break. Try me next time with more
notice, I am a very busy and important person.

	jscott@susmangodfrey.com
	05/25/2000 09:52 AM

		 To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lunch friday

I have depos at 2 pm in Houston. Can you have lunch around noon?

John


There would have been more of these if I could just learn to keep my fingers
out from in front of the lens......


Rafael  Pina @ shell is Lia's Contact
713-241-7645


FYI - I spoke with Kevin today and he volunteered the following individuals to help you curve validation.
Chris Dorland - West
Doug Gilbert-Smith - ERCOT
Dana Davis - NE
Fletch Sturm - MW/SE

Ed


According to Hully - we have a game tentatively scheduled for tomorrow at 7 p.m.  He needs to know ASAP who can play because of some snafu at the Y(we were supposed to play last night and they forgot to call him).  Let me know today if you can play and I will let him know so he can call the Y.  Thanks.
PL


During the course of their investigation, Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation will be taking documents they believe may be important for their investigation from employees' offices.  The FBI has agreed to return copies of such documents.

In addition, should you have an immediate need for a document requested by the FBI, please make a copy of the specific document and give the original to the FBI. Thank you for your cooperation.


Vince,

My name is Shelly Jones, I am the analyst recruiting manager for the
Associate/Analyst Program.  Christy Young passed on information from the
University of Houston AIESEC program.  Due to the restructuring of the
Associate/Analyst Program and the new policies regarding the interview
process, compensation, offers, etc., we will not be participating in the
AIESEC Program this year.  Due to your past interest in the program, I have
forwarded the literature on to you, via inter-office mail, for your
consideration.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thank you for your time.
Shelly Jones


Desk	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest
Flow Date	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001
Deal Number	  	  	  	 9/9/4102
Delivery Point	 NO DEALS TO REAL TIME	 SP	  	  	 NO DEALS TO REAL TIME
CTPY	  	  	  	 CA Imbalance
MWH	  	  	  	 12
Position	  	  	  	 Short
Hours	  	  	  	 Peak
Price	  	  	  	  $                  24.13

 	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest
1	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
2	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
3	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
4	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
5	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
6	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
7	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
8	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
9	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
10	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
11	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
12	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
13	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
14	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
15	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
16	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
17	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
18	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
19	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
20	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
21	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
22	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
23	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
24	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
Total	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(192.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	MRI TEST Dr. Ehini 713-790-1211

Date:		8/24/2000
Time:		10:00 AM - 4:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description: