Ken,

I have been working to put together the business agenda for the Management
Conference in November.  The theme I am proposing is "Reinventing Enron ...
Again!"  I believe the theme is timely as we celebrate our 15 year history
and address significant changes for the future.

Attached is a draft of the agenda for your review.  I had an opportunity to
run it by Jeff last week.  He was happy with the theme and the first day's
schedule.  He asked that we keep the second day open given the changes that
will likely develop between now and November.  He felt the second day might
best be used to establish a new "manifest" for the company.   We will, of
course, remain flexible.  However, I am showing you the agenda as Jeff saw it
as an example of how the day might run.

Also, on the first day, we'd like to have a spokesperson from Blockbuster
speak between Tom Peters and Gary Hamil.  Mr. Peters will help set the theme
by discussing the need for successful companies to reinvent themselves.  Mr.
Hamil will present tactical strategies for innovation.  Our thought is that a
Blockbuster spokesperson could discuss their company's experience with
reinvention -- they are in an interesting situation as the delivery
mechanisms for their products are evolving.  Would you recommend we invite
John Antioco, chairman & CEO, or Mark Gilman, president of New Media?
Several have indicated that Mr. Gilman would be a more provocative speaker
and better equipped to address the theme of reinvention.

I look forward to your feedback and/or suggestions.

Thanks,
Terrie James


I received the Schedule X hard copy -- I expect you will be having it
installed in the electronic version of the document also?

	Michelle Parks/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/09/2001 09:33 AM

		 To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike
Curry/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Smith L
Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: RE: QSE Agreement with New Power

David:

The new version looks good. I made 1 change. In Section 2.9, I added a phrase
that the Calendar will be posted on ERCOT MIS, so New Power will know where
to go to find any changes or updates to the schedule made by ERCOT. Paul
Radous is sending you a hard copy of the current Calendar to include as an
attachment and he expects to have the credit language to you before noon. I
am OK with the Confidentaility section. Let's just see what Anoush says.

Tom, Smith, Lloyd, Theresa, Jeff - please give us any comments you have. I
have to send this document to Anoush today. However, I will make it clear
that there may be additional comments.

Thanks,

Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Portz, David
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 7:54 PM
To: Parks, Michelle; Radous, Paul; Curry, Mike
Cc: Sager, Elizabeth
Subject: QSE Agreement with New Power

Attached is my preliminary mark-up of the draft sent by Mike Curry (5-2-01)
incorporating the various following e-mails of Michelle to the best of my
ability.  I ask that commercial persons rig up (or have someone else rig up
for them) the "Attachment X" referenced in Michelle's new Section 2.9
language.  Paul, I have reinstalled the Credit Support Annex in case you were
intending to use that apparatus to install credit terms (and I'm presuming
you are going to pull in an Enron Corp. guaranty, though I don't know your
intentions.)  Please respond to me ASAP with your best efforts to state the
final terms to be shown to
New Power, and I will refine the document into shape suitable to be sent
out.  Note -- I am uncertain how the confidentiality obligation in Section
7.2 should be stated in view of the possibly converging relations of ENA
Wholesale with EES, and therefore desire that it be stated as narrowly as can
be done while addressing New Power's main concerns and stating an EPMI
obligation with clear and livable boundaries.

 << File: NewPower QSE LSE Agr 5-9-01.doc >>
_______________________________________________

	Paul Radous/ENRON@enronXgate 05/07/2001 10:50 AM 	   To: Michelle
Parks/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: RE: QSE
Agreement with New Power

Michelle,

I do not see any problem whatever with this timeline.

Thanks.
Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Parks, Michelle
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Radous, Paul; Portz, David
Subject: QSE Agreement with New Power

David, Paul:

Do you think it will be possible to finish your mark-ups on the New Power
Agreement by Wednesday?

Thanks,

Michelle


FYI
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 09:11 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/31/2000 12:41 PM

		 To: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Enron Australia agency agreement

Hi, Susan.  Just to let you know that I will have the agreements executed by
ENA once you have initialled and returned them to me.  Thanks.  Sara


After our discussion at lunch last Thursday, I think I need more advice from
you on how to deal with the sort of intervention you can see below!! I tried
really hard to cover all the bases on this initiative, nearly all face to
face. Then Paul H didn't turn up at the staff meeting on Monday and I get the
e-mailed questions you see below (when he could have come to chat to me about
it.) I will of course try to smooth over things verbally with Paul, but if
this is what happens when I "give up" 30% of the time of a direct report to
benefit her career development and the company's biz. priorities, you will
understand some frustration on my part at our current arrangements!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 17/07/2001 20:37
---------------------------

Peter Styles
17/07/2001 20:19
To: Paul Hennemeyer/Enron@EUEnronXGate @ ENRON
cc: Doug Wood/Enron@EUEnronXGate@ENRON, Paul Dawson/Enron@EUEnronXGate@ENRON

Subject: Nailia's opportunity to work more on the trading floor

I have made no formal request to HR for housing, Paul. As you know, I have
agreed with Eric Shaw, Paul Mead, Paul Dawson and Alfredo Huertas that Nailia
will spend c. 30% of her time in the next six months working on Italian reg.
issues, and that to facilitate that role and to help her get better exposure
to commercial teams on EU issues too, she will spend on average three days a
week over that period on the trading floor, next to the Italian team. (We
announced all of this in the staff meeting yesterday.)

Her travel to London tends to be weekly already, and is done on a very
reasonable Eurostar youth fare basis. I think the budget question then is
simply: Is it more efficient for the company to pay for a hotel room two,
three or four nights a week or to allow Nailia to take a cheap flat share?
The latter may well work out better, especially taking into account the
flexibility it will allow. I am told Tara Rozen has a suggestion. Let's see
the comparison; then I agree the four of us should judge together. I'll keep
you informed. Give me a call if you have any other concerns about any aspect
of the arrangements.

Peter.

From: Paul Hennemeyer/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 17/07/2001 19:35
To: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Doug Wood/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Paul Dawson/Enron@EUEnronXGate

Subject: Accomodation for Nailia

Peter

I understand from Sophie Kingsley that a request has been placed with her to
secure housing for
Nailia in London for a few days each week for the next several months. I have
discussed this with Doug and Paul.
We would like to discuss this with you to understand the thinking behind this
as well as the expense. It seems reasonable
in these days of cost cutting that we make these decisions jointly. Thanks

Paul


---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001
10:45 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           01/04/2001 10:37 AM

To: O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://www.s-a-g-e.com/


http://www.co.montgomery.tx.us/phonbook/

Jana Phillips
Marketing Manager
New York Mercantile Exchange
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 1095
Houston, TX 77002

Phone: (713) 658 9296
Fax  : (713) 658 9393
Jlpnymex@aol.com


There will be a Transmission Presentation with Dave Forster & Stephen Benchluch on November 28, 2001 from 3:30-5:30.  If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance please let me know.

Thanks,
Lisa x39194


This is unreal.  If TW ain't on the A list, who is?


Hi Lyn:

Alex Huang has requested a new PC and Vince Kaminski has ok'd it.  Please
order the computer as listed below in Alex's request.

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
01:48 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
01/07/2000 12:12 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: New PC

Shirley,

OK.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
12:02 PM ---------------------------

Alex Huang@ENRON
01/07/2000 08:28 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New PC

Hi Shirley,
I would like to request for a new PC.  My current PC is quite old with not
enough memory.  Twice
I ran out of memory and had to have IT people coming to clean it for me.
Their suggestion is
to either get a new hard drive or a new PC.  Given that Dell has Pentiumc III
Processor at 800 MHz
on market, I would like to request a PC with process at 500 MHz or higher
level.
Thank you very much.

Best,
Alex


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
04:32 PM ---------------------------

Tanya Tamarchenko
04/05/2001 04:56 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Credit Var Model and DPR


Sara,

Please advise if I may be of assistance -- I believe this request requires a lawyers attention.

Susan
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Newbrough, Jennifer
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:53 AM
To:	Bailey, Susan; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Forest Products Trading Counterparties

I have attached a file which shows the information we would like to send to International Paper regarding counterparties.  It includes a description of the company (but not the name), the % of total tons traded and the credit rating of the counterparty.  Can you let me know if you think this information can be given to a third party under the confidentiality provisions mentioned below?  Please let me know.

Thanks,
Jennifer

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 4:53 PM
To:	Newbrough, Jennifer
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Forest Products Trading Counterparties

Jennifer,

I have completed my review of the selected Forest Products counterparties listed in your email request of January 15th.   My review focused on the "Confidentiality" provision contained in either the Master Agreement or the Confirmation(s), being the documentation which established the trading relationship with either Enron North America Corp. ("ENA") or Enron Canada Corp. ("ECC").   I was asked to determine if the "Confidentiality" provision in our trading documents would prohibit ENA and/or ECC from disclosing to third parties: (a) "the existence of a Master Agreement" or (b) "the existence of a transaction under a Confirmation".

Conclusion:  Whether the trading relationship was established under a Master Agreement or under the Confirmation(s) -- the "Confidentiality" language employed by ENA and ECC prohibits the public disclosure relating to the Master Agreement or to the Confirmation(s).   Therefore, if ENA and/or ECC desire to public disclose "the existence of a Master Agreement" or "the existence of a transaction under a Confirmation" -- ENA and/ECC must first secure the prior consent of any counterparty before public disclosure to third party can be made.

For your convenience, attached are my findings as set forth in the following:

1.	Master Agreement List for the Forest Products Trading Counterparties, along with the forms of "Confidentiality" provisions:

 << File: master agreement list (forest products counterparty).doc >>                 << File: confidentiality - master (standard provision).doc >>                    << File: confidentiality-master (non-standard provision).doc >>
2.	Forest Products Trading Counterparties without a Master Agreement, along with the "Confidentiality" provision:

 << File: non master agreement  list (forest products counterparty).doc >>                  << File: confidentiality - confirms (standard provision).doc >>

If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Newbrough, Jennifer
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:35 AM
To:	Bailey, Susan
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Forest Products Trading Counterparties

Susan,

Sorry about the previous attempt.  This is the list of counterparties.  We need to know if we can disclose to third parties that we have traded with them and the volumes associated with the trades.  Thanks for your help.  Call me if you need clarification.

Thanks for your help,
Jennifer Adams

Waste Management Inc.
Georgia Pacific Corp
Casella Waste Systems Inc.
US Gypsum
Inland Paper and Packaging
Rand Whitney Counterboard
National Gypsum Company
Norampac
Atlantic Packaging Products, ltd.
General Mills
Papier Mason
Media News
Times Mirror
Macro Media
Knight Ridder
Media General
New York Times
Tembec Industries
Pacifica Paper
Rock Ten
Conagra Energy Svcs
Frito Lay
Lin Packaging
Dial
National Banc of Canada
Master Packaging
Sodra
James Hardie NV
Appleton Paper
Merita Bank
Repap New Brunswick
Boise Cascade
Caima
Irving Pulp and Paper
UPM Kymmene
Proctor & Gamble

Jennifer Adams
Manager, Corporate Development
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002
Tele:  713/853-3919
Fax:  713/646-4043


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042311.txt


This should help - lets talk on Monday and see if we can identify a specific
customer.
Peggy
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES on 09/15/2000 06:37
PM ---------------------------

Peggy Mahoney
09/14/2000 06:09 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES,
Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES,
Ronald G Mentan/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Enron Energy Services: With Dereg Under Fire,Enron Calif Elec
Business Heats Up

FYI - not sure if you guys saw this!  Still looking for a corporate customer
to go on record.
Peggy
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES on 09/14/2000 06:06
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Christopher Smith                           09/14/2000 11:54 AM

To: Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Enron Energy Services: With Dereg Under Fire,Enron Calif Elec
Business Heats Up

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher Smith/HOU/EES on 09/14/2000
11:54 AM ---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 09/14/2000 12:41:56 PM
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 190852@mailman.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Enron Energy Services: With Dereg Under Fire,Enron Calif Elec
Business Heats Up

With Dereg Under Fire,Enron Calif Elec Business Heats Up
By Jason Leopold

09/14/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- While federal regulators try to find a way to
stabilize soaring wholesale electricity prices in California, Enron Corp.
(ENE) has been quietly striking up deals with some suburban communities to
sell them fixed-price power at a lower rate.

  In the past month, the Houston-based electricity service provider entered
into long-term fixed-rate contracts with the city of Roseville and is
negotiating similar deals with the cities of San Marcos and Chula Vista. Both
of those cities currently get their power from San Diego Gas & Electric Co, a
unit of Sempra Energy Inc. (SRE), and pay market rates for electricity.
  Enron has also struck a deal with Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc.
(HOT), one of the world's largest hospitality companies, to sell the company
electricity at a fixed rate for the next 10 years. The company has four hotels
in California, three of which buy their power from SDG&E.

  Sources close to the matter said Enron has contracted to sell the hotel
power at about 6 cents per kilowatt-hour, compared with the 22.5 cents/KWh
Starwood said it was charged by SDG&E in August.

  Neither company would disclose the terms of the deal. But Starwood said it
expects to reduce its energy costs by more than $200 million over the next 10
years.

  Enron, the largest trader of electricity and natural gas in the U.S., will
purchase power to cover such contracts on the wholesale markets and use its
experience to manage the risks, while paying a fee to utilities like SDG&E for
use of their distribution networks.

  "That really is our core strength," said Harold Buchanan, chief operating
officer for Enron Energy Services North America. "We understand how to manage
those risks."

  High Rates Driving Industrial Customers, Cities To Switch

  The growing interest in fixed-price supply contracts is fueling a comeback
of sorts for Enron.

  The Houston-based company had tried to break into California's retail power
market just after deregulation, even spending nearly $1 million to advertise
the venture during the Super Bowl. But Enron gave up trying to win residential
customers in 1998, citing disappointing response and lower-than-expected
profits.

  That was when deregulation and competitive power markets were full of
promise. Oddly enough, now that deregulation is coming under attack in
California, soaring power prices are building demand for Enron's services.

  The company is fielding calls from large industrial customers in San Diego
that have seen their utility bills triple in the past three months and are
interested in signing long-term fixed-rate contracts, Buchanan said.

  "Overall, what Enron can provide is reliability pricing in San Diego that's
written in stone," Buchanan said. "It's far cheaper than what they're paying
now with the utilities."

  A number of large industrial customers negotiating with Enron declined to
comment.

  The city of Roseville, near Sacramento, entered into a $114 million contract
with Enron last month to purchase 50 megawatts of electricity for five years
at $49 per megawatt-hour.

  Furthermore, the city has started talks with Enron about building and
operating a 750-megawatt natural gas-fired power plant that city officials
expect will contribute to lower costs for the purchase of electricity.

  Mayor Harry Crabb said the plant could protect residents from the price
spikes that have plagued customers of SDG&E since June.

  San Marcos, in San Diego County, is proposing to switch electricity service
for its 10,000 residents to Enron from SDG&E - a move the City Council said
could shave about $12 million a year off the city's power bill. Enron has said
it would offer the city terms nearly identical to those it offered Roseville.

  An SDG&E spokesman said last week that the utility supports such
arrangements, saying they're one way deregulation is supposed to work.

  Enron offered earlier this summer to sell power to SDG&E itself for four
years at a fixed rate of 5.5 cents/KWh, but the utility said the price was too
high.

  California Gov. Gray Davis signed legislation two weeks ago to cap
electricity rates for SDG&E's customers at 6.5 cents/KWh.

  -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com

Folder Name: Enron Energy Services
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 80

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


If you are reading this message in plaintext or if you have an AOL address you must click on this link: http://listserv.otcjournal.com/otcjournal/20011020-1.html  and wait for a web page to automatically open up to properly read this newsletter.
[IMAGE]		[IMAGE][IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

  [IMAGE] October 20, 2001 [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Volume IV, Issue 91 [IMAGE]     Email : info@otcjournal.com   URL : http://www.otcjournal.com    To OTC Journal Members:      [IMAGE] Special Announcement     When I look back on all these worries I remember the story of the old man who said on his deathbed that he had had a lot of trouble in his life, most of which never happened. Sir Winston Churchill from Their Finest Hour  We are working on a very special edition custom tailored for bargain hunters. The last three weeks have led investors to believe there are other directions stocks can go besides straight down.   There are many technology stocks trading at less than 1% of their previous highs. Stocks are so low the NASDAQ has suspended its minimum $1 bid rule for the remainder of the year and has announced it will review the rule early next year.   Unlike most market environments, individual investors have a competitive advantage over fund managers with stocks at these levels. Most fund managers have thresholds below which they are not allowed to hold stocks. Many funds cannot hold stocks below $5, and others have a $1 threshold. Fund managers have been forced to sell stocks at these levels in order to comply with the rules of their fund, oftentimes against their personal wishes and their own common sense. Fund managers will be able to purchase these stocks again once they appreciate above $1 and $5.   We are working on a list of stocks with compelling values that are very oversold. In order to make the list, the stock must be trading below the cash value the company has per share, and have little or no debt. We will try to publish this exciting edition next weekend. We might call it the "Riskless Rebound" edition. Stayed tuned.     [IMAGE] Energy Power Systems (OTC BB: EYPSF) Updated Profile [IMAGE]  Followers of Energy Power know it has been trading up and down the charts over the last 2 weeks. We are suggesting the company change its symbol to OTIS as the stock goes up and down like an Otis Elevator.   For investors looking for more information on Energy Power, the editors of the OTC Journal have updated our original profile to reflect changing corporate events subsequent to the original release on February 12th.   Click Here  to review the updated profile. If you never read our original release this would be an excellent opportunity to familiarize yourself with this company.     [IMAGE] Envoy Communications (NASDAQ: ECGI) Update [IMAGE]  Our inbox is filled with questions on Envoy as the stocks fades into the oblivion of the $1 range. The stock is behaving as if there is something wrong with the company.   We spoke with management briefly this week about this issue. At the corporate level nothing has changed. Fiscal 2001, which ended at the end of September, still looks like roughly $10 million CDN in EBITDA profits. As of right now, business for fiscal 2002 looks about the same as 2001. The stock is trading at about 3 times 2002 EBITDA. The industry average is currently 11 times 2002 EBITDA.   What's the explanation for this pathetic performance? Simple- management is doing nothing at this time to market their company to investors. Their only audience is the members of the OTC Journal.   A plan for a nationwide institutional road show was in place prior to Attack on America, but that is now on hold. We can only hope management will wake up and recognize their responsibility to shareholders and get proactive in telling their story.    Tax selling could hurt this stock, so it could go lower. One can only hope that despite management's failure to get out and tell their story, someone will come along and recognize the inherent value in this company.   Bottom line- Not worth selling at this price, but it could go lower.     [IMAGE] Attention Football Fans [IMAGE]  We found an awesome web site for football fans seeking a competitive edge on handicapping games. For those who like to make an occasional friendly wager on a football game, www.gridpicks.com  is for you.   Go to the home page and sign up for their free newsletter. Last weekend they went 11-6 in the college games and 10-4-1 in Pro games against the spread.   The OTC Journal supports the spirit of fun and speculation wherever it can be found.   Charts Provided Courtesy Of TradePortal.com    The OTC Journal is a proud partner of the SwingWire.com Online Investment Community . A next generation Online Analyst Exchange providing Members the ability to search, review, track and monitor some of the Internet's best Online CAs (CyberAnalysts). Members have the opportunity to potentially achieve higher returns by viewing top performing portfolios and receiving real-time alerts from favorite CAs.    SwingWire.com  also has a lucrative incentive model for experienced investors and traders who consistently outperform the market. Share market ideas with other like-minded investors, establish a proven track record, provide insightful commentary, attract followers and ultimately become one of the Internet's highest paid and most sought after CyberAnalysts!    Click here to receive your FREE 30-Day Trial Membership with no further obligation. Sign Up Today!     Disclaimer   The OTCjournal.com Newsletter is an independent electronic publication committed to providing our readers with factual information on selected  publicly traded companies. All companies are chosen on the basis of certain financial analysis and other pertinent criteria with a view toward  maximizing the upside potential for investors while minimizing the downside risk, whenever possible.  Moreover, as detailed below, this publication accepts compensation from certain of the companies which it features.  Likewise, this newsletter is owned by MarketByte, LLC.  To the degrees enumerated herein,  this newsletter should not be regarded as an independent publication.    Click Here  to view our compensation on every company we have ever covered, or visit the following web address:  http://www.otcjournal.com/disclaimer.html  for our full profiles and http://www.otcjournal.com/trading-alerts/disclaimer.html  for Trading Alerts.   All statements and expressions are the sole  opinions of the editors and are subject to change without notice. A profile, description, or other mention of a company in the newsletter is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or sell any securities  mentioned. While we believe all sources of information to be factual and reliable, in no way do we represent or guarantee the accuracy thereof, nor the statements made herein.   The editor, members of the editor's family, and/or entities with which they are affiliated, are forbidden by company policy to own, buy, sell or otherwise trade stock for their own benefit in the companies who appear in the publication.   The profiles, critiques, and other editorial content of the OTCjournal.com may contain forward-looking statements relating to the expected capabilities of the companies mentioned herein.   THE READER SHOULD VERIFY ALL CLAIMS AND DO THEIR OWN DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE INVESTING IN ANY SECURITIES MENTIONED. INVESTING IN  SECURITIES IS SPECULATIVE AND CARRIES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. THE INFORMATION FOUND IN THIS PROFILE IS PROTECTED BY THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE COPIED, OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED, WRITTEN  CONSENT OF THE EDITORS OF OTCjournal.com.   We encourage our readers to invest carefully and read the investor information available at the web sites of  the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") at http://www.sec.gov and/or the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") at http://www.nasd.com . We also strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to investors concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be found at  http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm . Readers can review all public filings by companies at the SEC's EDGAR page. The NASD has published information on how to invest carefully at its web site.     Unsubscribe Here     You can unsubscribe from this list at any time by Clicking Here  and HITTING SEND. If you are having difficulty removing yourself or wish to change your address please go to http://listserv.otcjournal.com/opt.cgi?email=alewis@ect.enron.com .

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

  ---
You are currently subscribed to otcjournal as: alewis@ect.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-otcjournal-1163964L@lyris.otcjournal.com


Thanks as usual for the prompt response.  You are a star!

	Edmund Cooper
	07/07/2000 05:41 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Need Help!

From: Tana Jones on 07/07/2000 02:55 PM CDT
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Need Help!

I am working with the Click Paper.com lawyers on their online documentation,
and they want to see a UK form of financial GTC.  Can you send me one?

As ever, in your debt...


Hello...
Despite my thoughts, you like baseball.   So the question is do you like art
(as in musuems)  ?
I'm leaning towards yes but don't know for sure.


Subject = Andrew, $42,704 Profits for 3 Straight Months!

Re: The Golden Secret Of Price, Time And Market Symmetry
http://store.ino.com/private/1DC1C/TWPD-GOLDEN

Dear Andrew:

See How One Trader Averages A Documented . . .

$42,704 PROFIT PER MONTH

. . . For 3 Straight Years!

You can know when and where price will turn in every market.
Short-term and intra-day moves and turning points can be
pinpointed - absolutely!

Discover the price and time forces which propel and even drive
the market each trading day.

These forces are nothing less than amazing. There are rhythmical,
natural patterns that occur an astounding 85%-95% of the time in
virtually every stock, currency, bond and futures contracts'
movements.

In other words, 85%-95% of the time we know where the market is
going. Precisely. Trading with up to 90% plus win rates - as
you'll see inside - is no accident.

This secret - the secret to becoming a millionaire - lies within
a powerful and shocking new book.

These explosive insider secrets unlock the door to staggering
profits, allowing you to cash in on the most powerful money-
making opportunity in existence.

Details Inside...

http://store.ino.com/private/1DC1C/TWPD-GOLDEN

Questions?  Order by Phone?

Call us Toll Free at 800-538-7424 or 410-867-7424

Cheers and Good Trading to You!

J. Adam Hewison
President
INO.com

P.S. Andrew...we have reserved your copy so
        click here to find out more!
http://store.ino.com/private/1DC1C/TWPD-GOLDEN

Shocking New Book!

Thank you for subscribing to the Weekly Specials email
from INO.com. If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit:
http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.ino.com/email/remove/?email=alewis@ect.enron.com&list=special

-----Copyright 2001 INO.com. All Rights Reserved------


FYI-
Dick successfully traded 5000 of Columbia Gas Transmission Capacity for 12/00
with Dynegy.
I posted the release without any problems.
Thanks for getting pipeline capacity setup as a product on EOL.
Scott


Please confirm receipt. I may be having e-mail problems...
I'm calling them and Red Oak this morning. I will have GR do the back yard
also. NM

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:26 AM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: Save the Date -- Star Wars: The Magic of Myth

Gold Rose today?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 07:25
AM ---------------------------

From: Mark E Haedicke@ECT on 06/05/2001 01:46 PM

Sent by:  Janette Elbertson@ECT

To:   Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Blaine/ENRON@enronXgate, Sandi M
Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gail Brownfeld/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dominic Carolan/Enron@EnronXGate, Barton
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
Ned E Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter del
Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Shawna
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne
Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Lindeman/ENRON@enronXgate, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harlan
Murphy/NA/Enron@Enron, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Coralina Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou
Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha
Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Sarah
Bruck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Goode/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie
Heard/NA/Enron@Enron, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Carnahan/Enron@EnronXGate, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie
Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Ferguson/NA/Enron@Enron, Majed Nachawati/NA/Enron@Enron, Suzanne
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie
Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Margaret
Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keegan
Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Nita Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Esmeralda Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Vanessa
Griffin/ENRON@enronXgate, Martha Keesler/ENRON@enronXgate, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, MaryHelen
Martinez/NA/Enron@Enron, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rae
Meadows/ENRON@EnronXgate, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky
Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Truss/Enron@EnronXGate, Alice Wright/NA/Enron@Enron, Theresa
Zucha/NA/Enron@Enron, Reginald Shanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia
Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Save the Date -- Star Wars:  The Magic of Myth

(Embedded image moved to file: pic14413.pcx)                      (Embedded
image moved to file: pic16641.pcx)

(Embedded image moved to file: pic19855.pcx)

The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

(Embedded image moved to file: pic24855.pcx)


Good morning all:

Most of you do this, but just in case, please advise me of any off duty
days, i.e. vacation, sick, personal, jury duty, etc. as soon as possible,
either before or as soon as you take them.

Also, I am making new wallet info cards and if you have not sent me
your home telephone number, or if you have a new one, please let
me know as soon as possible.

Thanks and have a great day!

Shirley


Gouger Gray Davis
California's petulant governor ignores reality as he overpays for electricity

LANCE T. IZUMI Mr. Izumi is a senior fellow in California Studies at the San
Francisco- based Pacific Research Institute.
On the surface, things seem to be going pretty good for Gov. Gray Davis with
regard to California's electricity crisis. The governor has scored some nice
publicity by switching on some new power plants. The weather has been
unseasonably cool. His poll numbers are edging back up. Yet beneath this
optimistic picture lie troubling problems. For example, Davis's argument that
out-of-state power generators are responsible for the electricity crisis has
been falling apart. For months, Davis has been claiming that private
generators have overcharged California by $8.9 billion and demanded that this
amount be refunded to the state. However, after a two-week mediation between
state officials and the generators, Curtis Wagner, the federal government's
chief energy regulatory judge, rebuked Davis's claim saying that such a huge
overcharge "has not and cannot be substantiated." Further, while the
generators may be liable to refund a much smaller amount to the state,
perhaps $1 billion, Wagner said that generators are owed more money by the
state than they owe the state in refunds: "Can a cash refund be required
where a much larger amount is due the seller? The chief judge thinks not."
Davis reacted to the judge's ruling by calling it a "raw deal" and by urging
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to ignore the lack of evidence and
the judge's conclusions and to "step up and provide the refunds we've asked
for." Davis's position, as usual, is motivated purely by politics. Indeed,
Dan Walters of the Sacramento Bee says that Davis is operating in a
"melodramatic virtual world" de-linked from reality.
Davis's blame-the-generators argument took another body blow when newly
released documents showed that, on average, major out-of-state power
companies such as Enron, Duke, Dynergy and Mirant charged less than the
average prices paid by the state during the first three months of the year.
California government utilities, on the other hand, such as the Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District
(SMUD), charged the state much more for electricity than the out-of-state
generators. For example, while Texas-based Enron, a favorite Davis whipping
boy, charged an average $181 per megawatt hour, SMUD charged an average $330
per megawatt hour.
Davis responded to this revelation in typical political fashion. A Davis
spokesman said that the governor had expressed his anger at "the generators
who wear cowboy hats" and that "just because there are other entities that
are charging us more doesn't change the fact that we are getting ripped off
by companies from Houston, Tulsa, Atlanta or Charlotte."
Yet, for all Davis' feigned indignation about consumers being ripped off, it
turns out that he and his regulators are poised to ensure that business
consumers are ripped off by state government. Davis has signed $43 billion in
ill-advised long-term purchase contracts at rates above-market-price. The
state must, therefore, ensure that enough business customers remain in the
current state-controlled distribution system to pay for high-priced state
power purchases. This is especially important to Davis since the high prices
are borne disproportionately by business. Thus, Davis' regulators are set to
eliminate "direct access," which allows businesses to shop for cheaper power.
Who's the real gouger? No matter how much Davis points the finger,
Californians are paying dearly for his political opportunism and bad
policies.


Either...you pick the day!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 1:13 PM
To:	Lokay, Michelle; Matthews, Ron
Cc:	Watson, Kimberly; Alters, Dennis; Asante, Ben
Subject:	Baker Fied Project

Michelle& Ron

Is Monday Mar-4, 9-10 am or Tuesday-Mar-4, 9-10 am ( my office) good for you to discuss the Baker Field project?
Please let me know.

Thanks, Mansoor


fyi.....

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	CustomerNotices, WGPHOU [mailto:WGPHOU.CustomerNotices@Williams.com]
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:24 AM
Subject:	Operational Flow Order

November 29, 2001

To:  Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers
and Shippers Under All Rate Schedules

Re: Operational Flow Order

On Monday, November 26, 2001, Transco issued a System
Imbalance Notice advising of an unacceptable level of
transportation imbalances and requesting that all shippers
and customers on Transco's system (referred to herein as
"Buyers") avoid any future positive imbalance and resolve
existing positive imbalances.  Transco indicated that,
absent voluntary compliance with this notice, Transco may
be required to implement the provisions of Section 52 of
the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff.
On Tuesday, November 27, 2001, Transco again issued a
notice requesting that Buyers ensure that physical receipts
and physical deliveries were in balance on a daily basis
and reiterating its request that Buyers reduce any positive
imbalances immediately.

Due to the lack of effective voluntary compliance with its
previous requests to reduce transportation imbalances,
Transco continues to experience unmanageable levels of
positive transportation imbalances and all operational
tools have been exhausted.  Transco can no longer tolerate
daily positive imbalances in the face of warmer-than-normal
temperatures expected for its market area.

Consequently, due to severe operational concerns and in
order to protect the integrity of Transco's system, Transco
hereby issues a system-wide Imbalance Operational Flow
Order (OFO) to all Buyers pursuant to the terms of Section
52 of the General Terms and Conditions of Transco's FERC
Gas Tariff.  The OFO shall be effective as of the beginning
of the gas day on December 1, 2001 and shall continue until
further notice.  All Buyers shall be required to ensure
that positive imbalances (i.e. receipts into Transco's
system in excess of deliveries from Transco's system) be
limited to 5% on a daily basis.  Any daily imbalance in
excess of 5% and 1,000 dts shall constitute an unauthorized
OFO Imbalance and shall be subject to penalties pursuant to
Section 52.5 of the General Terms and Conditions.  Such
penalties will be based upon the aggregate daily imbalance
per rate schedule for each Buyer.

Buyers that have a negative imbalance (i.e. receipts into
Transco's system less than deliveries from Transco's
system) will not be subject to the provisions of this OFO.

If you have any questions, please contact Terry C. Fitch at
(713)215-3361 or John E. McGrath at (713)215-2514.

Ronald C. Doyle
Director
Gas Management and Control


Dear Market Participants,

Please note the changes below are planned for the indicated
OASIS/MIS/CSS systems on the dates shown.  Updates and revisions
will follow as needed to keep you informed.
Please direct any questions or comments back to me.

Thank you,
Pete Morrison
Customer Relations
518-356-6060

##################################################################
Scheduled for 12/13/00
Change type - Enhancement
Description:
The Billing system will be corrected to use external zonal prices
for the calculation of external load transactions.
The SPIDER power system model will be updated to reflect physical
changes to the electric system.
The Manual Dispatch System (MDS) will be modified to reflect the
recent transfer in ownership of Indian point 3; the DNI values for
that unit will be included in the DNI calculation for ConEd

?s
region (previously scheduled for 12/6/00).
FKOI-4RLQ5U; JCWG-4RBSEJ; MGUE-4RPMKN
##################################################################


Bob,
 Please review the suggested modifications to be made to the previously sent
confirmations for the above parties with regard to volumes to be processed at
the Lowry Gas Plant in Cameron Parish, Louisiana.  If you agree, please have
revised confirmations issued that would be in place of the previously sent
confirmations.  Please note that I only made changes to the price and
quantity to reflect the deal as reviewed with Nelson Ferries and Charlie
Otto.  Please call if you have any questions.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000
12:26 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           06/06/2000 10:26 AM

To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://ecthou-webcl1.nt.ect.enron.com/gas/

All the gas reports are under west desk

Call Brian Hoskins for a password


The name of the church is Bathesda by the Sea and the Rector's name is Father
Ralph Warren, number: 561-655-4554.  I believe he is traveling until Monday,
but you may want to give him a try.


As we all deal with the fallout from the California scene, I wanted to make
sure everyone was aware of the recent report of the UK's National Audit
Office (a highly creible organisation, along the lines of the US's General
Accounting Office, even similar function; independent, too), saying that
household electricity bills had been cut by 750 million pounds (if you are a
Yank, multiply by 1.5 for dollars saved), since the industry was opened to
competition two years ago.  Of course, much of this may be attributable to
the divestment of assets in the oligopolistic generation sector, now
competitive, but it is a very fari example of the benefits of competition and
should be cited as a counterweight to those arguing that competition is a
"failed experiment".  Paul Dawson, head of our UK regulatory team, can
provide any necessary further insights./details.   mcs


gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 12:08 PM -----

	Richard Shapiro
	02/09/2001 11:41 AM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: 01-238.pdf

Please forward to entire California distribution list. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001
11:45 AM ---------------------------

"JAMES L. HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM> on 02/09/2001 12:43:00 PM
To: rshapiro@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: 01-238.pdf

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from 10.4.218.11 by securemail1b.llgm.com with SMTP ( Tumbleweed
MMS SMTP Relay (MMS v4.7)); Fri, 09 Feb 2001 12:14:38 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: 2ddd99fc-ca0e-11d4-9906-00508bdcbe76
Received: from HEADQUARTERS#032#NEW#032#YORK-Message_Server by LLGM.COM with
Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 09 Feb 2001 12:14:18 -0500
Message-ID: <sa83df1a.084@LLGM.COM>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.2.1
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 13:13:47 -0500
From: "JAMES L. HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM>
To: mary.hain@enron.com, rick.shapiro@enron.com, "JOHN G KLAUBERG"
<JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
Subject: 01-238.pdf
X-WSS-ID: 169AFAF4312809-01-01
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;  boundary="=_A6FD155C.58393570"

http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caed/documents.nsf/84e64649a296def7882568fc0076ab
18/f8f79306e87b8db3882569ed007d1c31/$FILE/01-238.pdf

 - 01-238pd.url


Make sure this is on my schedule.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 08/04/2000
12:59 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey T Hodge@ECT
07/27/2000 10:46 AM
Sent by: Jenny Helton@ECT
To: Alonzo Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew R Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashton
Soniat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian O'Rourke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Hebert/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chad
Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlie
Jewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clint
Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Corry
Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Darren Delage/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J Vitrella/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Ryan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Zaccour/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dean Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diana Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Miller/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Douglas
SMITH/ENRON@Gateway, Ed Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elsa Piekielniak/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Erik
Serio/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, George
McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gerald Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Trefz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E
Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared
Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Crawford/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Wills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Greene/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zurita/HOU/EES@EES,
Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Keller
Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Cline/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lawrence
Clayton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Burnett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Antitrust Training Update

Attached is a memo detailing Antitrust Training.


John Galston
21 King Street
New York, NY 10014
jay_galston@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

John Galston
Enron Stockholder

John Galston


Vijay,

I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. I've been traveling again.
I also just found this in my in-box as returned as un-delivered (I put only
two v(s) instead of three.    I hope your other discussions went well that
day.

Below are a few comments that i believe you addressed and wanted some
additional feedback from our coal activities and changes in the coal
industry.  I wanted to get this out to you quickly so please forgive this
lack of formality or writing creativity.

Enron activity (EOL)
Enron's online activity has been very successful especially as compared with
our early estimations of acceptance by the industry.  I believe that there is
only one other active coal trading system (Dynegy direct) that simply isn't
posting prices as a bulletin board and waiting for a response with telephone
follow-up.  I also believe that we have done a very significant amount of or
maybe all the coal transactions on Dynegy direct to date.  We do a lot of our
business online and the numbers YTD are that approx. 45% of our trades are
executed online.  That number has been higher, as much as 90% for certain
months or when we are trying something new or moving a particular product.
Also, as Bid/Ask spreads tighten, which we would expect, that bodes well for
EOL and our (and the markets) ability to transact even more quickly.
Transactions that took days to put together now can be done in 1 second.
Between the speed and the cost savings of having a fully integrated system,
we believe that our transaction numbers and percentages of online business
will significantly increase.

Changes in the industry
We discussed changes that we believe are coming in the industry.  We see
several things on the horizon.  We expect the acceptance of the online
transactions to further increase; especially with the volatile price
movements what we have seen in the last 6 months.  We are currently
developing several new products for EOL that I believe will become very
popular and will create new markets in coal and related sectors.  I don't
want to discuss them right now but we are close to releasing them and I think
they will raise some eyebrows.    The development of the Global Coal exchange
will also help.  I frankly don,t believe it will be very successful because
of several things but primarily because of the difficulty in closing the
transaction. One thing has been very firmly demonstrated.  Every time a new
big system has been introduced EOL volumes go up.  It simply accelerates the
acceptance of online business and it gets down to the best prices and
liquidity to see who will ultimately win the day.  Another big change in the
industry is the growing acceptance of the OTC market.  The significant price
changes that have occurred have "forced" many traditional players to the OTC
market.  This also includes forcing them to agree to standard OTC terms and
conditions and getting them comfortable with the market.  This is very good
for Enron especially when you consider that we are the major player on the
OTC market.  We don't release specific percentages of what we are doing on
the OTC.  Also having more natural and traditional players signing these
types of standard agreements helps us on the EOL side because standard
contracts are important for developing a more liquid commodity market.

Enron coal volumes
A couple of numbers that we are willing to release.  Year to date, we have
made markets and transacted approx. 30 million tons in the forward market.
On the physical side of our transactions, about 25% go physical vs.
financial.  Last year Enron was the largest US market maker (not producer)
with 142 million tons transacted.   Internationally we moved approx. 47
million tons and overall the total was slightly less than 190 million tons.
We have high expectations for 2001.  I believe that we should be up approx
65% and we are on track with that.   I think the industry would be surprised
that we did almost 2,800 transactions in 2000.   This doesn,t include any of
our shipping business.

I hope this helps and please let me know if you have any other questions.

Mike


Hi Roni

Charnella had asked that I send you information regarding scooters.

The outfit is called Scoot Around North America.  They have a web site at
www.scootaround.com.  Their phone number is 1-888-441-7575.

Hope this works out for you.

Take Care!


The price is still 91.87.

Keoni Almeida
California Independent System Operator
phone: 916/608-7053
pager:  916/814-7352
alpha page:  9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net
e-mail:  <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	CRCommunications
> Sent:	Friday, June 22, 2001 11:34 AM
> To:	ISO Market Participants
> Subject:	CAISO Notice: Update to June 20 Market Notice
>
>  <<MARKET NOTICE 010622_.doc>>
>
> Market Participants:
> Please read the attached explanation of Footnote 14 in the California ISO
> June 20, 2001, Market Notice.
>
> CR Communications
> Client Relations Communications

 - MARKET NOTICE 010622_.doc


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Mark D. Davis Jr
Expense Report Name: Customer Dinner Meetings
Report Total: $194.78
Amount Due Employee: $194.78
Amount Approved: $194.78
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: In Progress

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Congrats to you too!  I'll see you in February unless you're in London
sooner.  Can't wait to start up the dinner club again!

See you soon.

Beth

Vince J Kaminski
11/01/2000 00:01
To: Beth Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Congratulations.

Beth,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


Following up on my previous e-mail, Mark Seetin with NYMEX sent the
attached request for help to the California Manufacturers and Technology
Association and WSPA for NYMEX's proposed direct access amendments
currently pending before Congress.

Received: (qmail 20089 invoked by uid 41); 14 May 2001 23:51:17 -0000
Received: from unidial.com (206.112.0.9)  by mx7.quiknet.com with SMTP; 14
May 2001 23:51:17 -0000
Received: from markseetin (pool-63.52.131.137.dlls.grid.net [63.52.131.137])
by unidial.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA10253; Mon, 14 May 2001 19:49:05
-0400 (EDT)
From: "Mark Seetin" <nymex2@unidial.com>
To: "Randy Poole" <rdp@scwa.ca.gov>, "Michael Kahl"
<mikahl@ka-pow.com>,        "Dorothy Rothrock" <drothrock@cmta.net>,
"Jack M. Stewart" <jstewart@cmta.net>,        "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>,        "Scott Govenar" <SGovenar@govadv.com>
Subject: URGENT NEED TO CONTACT CALIFORNIA CONGRESS MEMBERS TO SUPPORT OPEN
ACCESS AMENDMENT  ADDRESSES ATTACHED
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 19:49:06 -0400
Message-ID: <OIEJJAJCPELDHOOLFDLGEEDHCCAA.nymex2@unidial.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01C0DCAE.EFB7E340"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

If  California businesses are to have any chance to avoid being forced to
endure  unbelievable rate increases under the CPUC plan, they must have
direct  access.? Subcommittee Chairman Barton has told us he supports DA, and
we  have several California congressmen considering introducing the DA
amendment at  this Friday's full committee markup.? Please contact ALL
members that you  can.? Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Ose, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Cox and Mr.
Shadegg(Arizona)  have all expressed positive interest, but none has given
the firm committment  necessary to introduce the amendment.? Use the
telephone, the fax, e-mail,  and any other method you can to convince the
members to push hard for DA in H.R.  1647.
?
Contact me with any questions.
?
Mark  Seetin
-----Original Message-----
From: Charlie DeWitt  [mailto:nymex4@unidial.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 1:06  PM
To: Mark Seetin
Cc: Casey Beyer
Subject:  members information for amendment push

Energy and Air Quality Subcommittee

Republican Members?-- with their staffers in e-mail format

Full Committee Chairman Billy Tauzin (R-LA) David.Marventano@mail.house.gov
202-225-2927 fx225-1919

Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX), Andy.Black@mail.house.gov 202-225-2927  fx225-1919

Chris Cox (R-CA), Andy.Olson@mail.house.gov 225-5611 fx225-9177

Steve Largent (R-OK), Bob.Bolster@mail.house.gov 225-2211 fx225-9187

Richard Burr (R-NC), Brian.VanderBloemen@mail.house.gov 225-2071 fx  5-2995

Edward Whitfield (R-KY) Karen.Long@mail.house.gov 225-3115 fx 225-3547

Greg Ganske (R-IA), Doug.Stout@mail.house.gov , 225-4426 fx 225-3193

Charles Norwood (R-GA), Lem.Smith@mail.house.gov 225-4101 fx n/a

John M. Shimkus (R-IL), Ray.Fitzgerald@mail.house.gov 225-5271 fx5-5880

John Shadegg (R-AZ), Lance.Wenger@mail.house.gov 225-3361, fx 225-3462

Heather Wilson (R-NM), 225-6316 fx 225-4975

Ed Bryant (R-TN), 225-2811 fx225-2989

Chip Pickering (R-MS), 225-5031 fx 225-5797

George Radanovich (R-CA), 225-4540 fx 225-3402

Vito Fossella (R-NY), 225-3371 fx226-1272

Mary Bono (R-CA), Linda.Valter@mail.house.gov 225-5330 fx225-2961

Roy Blunt (R-MO), John.Dutton@mail.house.gov 225-6536 fx225-5604

Greg Walden (R-OR), 225-6730 fx225-5774

Lee Terry (R-NE), Mark.Anderson@mail.house.gov 225-4155 fx225-5452

Democrat Members

Rick Boucher (D-VA), Jody.Olson@mail.house.gov 225-3861 fx 225-0442

Ralph Hall (D-TX), Charles.Cooke@mail.house.gov 225-6673 fx225-3332

Tom Sawyer (D-OH), Joe.McGarvey@mail.house.gov 225-5231 fx225-5278

Albert Wynn (D-MD), Paul.Begey@mail.house.gov 225-8699 fx225-8714

Mike Doyle (D-PA), Sharon.Grant@mail.house.gov 225-2135 fx225-3084

Henry Waxman (D-CA), Greg.Dotson@mail.house.gov 225-3976 fx225-4099

Ed Markey (D-MA), Jeff.Duncan@mail.house.gov 225-2836 fx226-0092

Bart Gordon (D-TN), Louis.Finkel@mail.house.gov 225-4231 fx225-6887

Chris John (D-LA), Gordon.Taylor@mail.house.gov 225-2031 fx225-5724

Bobby Rush (D-IL), Nkosi.Bradley@mail.house.gov 225-4372 fx226-0333

Karen McCarthy (D-MO), Scott.Defife@mail.house.gov 225-4535 fx225-4403

Ted Strickland (D-OH), Michelle.Dallafior@mail.house.gov 225-5705  fx225-5907

Tom Barrett (D-WI), Ed.Walz@mail.house.gov 225-3571 fx225-2185

Bill Luther (D-MN), Steve.Heuer@mail.house.gov 225-2271 fx225-3368

CA Members not on subcommittee but on full committee:

Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Steven.Keenen@mail.house.gov 225-8104 fx225-8890

Lois Capps (D-CA), Randolph.Harrison@mail.house.gov 225-3601 fx225-5632

Jane Harman (D-CA), ("Hank") Henry.Dixon@mail.house.gov 225-8220  fx226-7290

Charlie DeWitt
Associate,  Government Affairs
New York Mercantile Exchange
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue,  NW? Suite 550-S
Washington, DC 20004
ph. (202) 662-8771
fax (202)  662-8765
nymex4@unidial.com
 - e&AQmembers.wpd


http://www.nola.com/lsu/t-p/football/index.ssf?/lsustory/lsufoot18.html

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture -- Houston
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


From: John Shafer/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/16/2001 09:07 PM CDT
To: Phil Lowry/ENRON@enronXgate, Jerry D Martin/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate, William Kendrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry
Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ruth Jensen/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard
Melton/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: Red Rock Air Permits Heads up!

Phil,
I agree with your assessment, but would offer some additional information.;
After returning from Austin on Wednesday and learning that Larry Campbell
had;received a negative reaction from EPA Region IX concerning a possible
meeting with them, I worked on this issue most of Thursday and Friday.; The
strategy I discussed with Lou was to locate a local Arizona or California
"political/lawyer" type;who would have the necessary contacts to get us in
there and get the permits moving.; Lou agreed and we have been working on
that strategy while gathering more information related to the "right" contact
that could get this job done.; I personally have had lengthy discussions
(Thursday and Friday) with Lou, Larry Campbell, Bill Kendrick and several key
consultants that have extensive contacts within both Arizona and
California.;We are closing in on a;local law firm and also a "high level;air
consultant";who will be able to get us in at the Director or Air Permit Chief
level;to present (1) our;situation, (2) clean air needs for Arizona and CA,
and (3) how long these permits have already been on file.; We should have
someone identified early this next week.;
;
Let me present the following information to;complement yours:
* ;The permitting timeline;being used;was based on historical
timelines;encountered;while processing prior Arizona projects.; No indication
of backlogs or slower processing in the beginning.; A familiar consultant
(Argent);was used for the air permit applications and no indication was
offered by the AZ DEQ or EPA Region IX that normal processing was not
occurring.; Applications filed in March, 2001 and by letter from the agencies
were deemed complete by mid-April.
* Within the last two weeks, the Arizona DEQ Permit Engineer assigned to the
applications for Station 1 and 2 has stated that he is overloaded and working
on the applications as they are in the "que".; He told Larry Campbell (and I
have verified;it also by talking to outside consultants that permit in
Arizona) that this is true and the AZ DEQ have been very slow lately in
getting permits out. (Caveat: One of the suggestions we want to carry in to
AZ DEQ is that we would be willing to pay for a third-party contractor to
take the permits and work them up;for release to the publishing firm so they
can be sent out for public comment.; AZ DEQ is willing to meet with us and
discuss our applications.);; Even if we get this part going, this is only
part of the problem.; Bottom line is;we must play our cards;correctly at this
juncture to be able to get our applications moved up in the que, typed, and
out for public comment; but EPA Region IX will still have thirty days after
that for their review of those two state issued permits.
* EPA Region IX is a different story.; It is most difficult to put pressure
on them, more so than AZ DEQ.; The applications for Stations 3 and 4 are on
tribal land and these;applications are not delegated to any state air quality
department.;;After the technical meetings in the office last week, Larry made
a couple of calls;to the Permit Engineer;in Region IX and received a negative
response.; Larry was told that the;permits would issue in one to four months
and that;there was no need for a meeting with them.; Again,;my advice at this
point is to find the right person with the right contacts at a very high
level and get the meeting set.; It's one thing to pressure the State of
Arizona and get a permit applications moving; but if we are not very careful
with Region IX we could damage our ability to not only get Sun Devil's
permits, but create audits and compliance situations that are far reaching.;
Again, we must first get a personal meeting with them;to enable us to
present;the need, circumstances, and how long these permits have already been
on file.; Locating the;correct person to help us do that is of upmost
importance!
* Clarifying the complicated point, EPA Region IX has responsibility
to;review and publish not only the permits for Stations 3 and 4, but to also
review the AZ DEQ permits for stations 1 and;2 for 30 days.; Therefore, if we
anger EPA Region IX over permits for Stations;3 and 4, they could delay the
issuance of the permits for Stations 1 and 2 that;have been expedited with
the AZ DEQ.; It's a two-edged sword.
Our Strategy:
* Continue to work on the technical staff permit engineers, but very
carefully.; Indications are that our phone calls are beginning to annoy them.
* Locate a political/lawyer type that has connections at the top of AZ DEQ
and EPA Region IX to help us get the;desired meeting with key;people in order
to;move;the permits.; This should be done within the next week.
* Offer to assist in any manner (e.g., funding a third party) to get the
permit applications moving out of AZ DEQ and EPA Region IX for public comment.
I have some strategic ideas that will increase the;probability that this type
of circumstance will not occur in the future.; I will be glad to discuss any
of this with you on Monday morning.; John Shafer
;
-----Original Message-----
From: Lowry, Phil
Sent: Sun 9/16/2001 8:56 AM
To: Martin, Jerry D.
Cc: Shafer, John
Subject: Red Rock Air Permits Heads up!

At Stan,s staff meeting last week, the discovery of a delay in the issuance
of Air Permits was discussed.; Stan indicated that this was unacceptable.; I
requested that you conduct a meeting that afternoon with key people to
outline a plan of attack to get the permit schedule back on track.; I am
aware that you did such and you provided a voice mail update that indicated a
plan.
;
Here is the problem.; Apparently the matter was further discussed at the
weekly Red Rock status meeting on Friday and the following feedback was
provided by a &little birdie8.; We can expect another unpleasant discussion
at Monday,s 8am meeting with Stan.
;
* Joe Hartsoe has been unable to pursue any discussion with Washington
officials to put pressure on Arizona.; WTC attacks!
* Operations is unwilling to put much pressure on Arizona/EPA out of concern
for future responsiveness from the agency Re: Sun Devil
* Sun Devil is a bird in the bush and Red Rock is a bird in the hand.
* There is no way that we can get the Red Rock project completed as promised
because we waited until it was too late to find out what was going on with
the Air Permits.
* The agency will not allow a bifurcation of the project and let us proceed
with on site construction prior to a permit and delay delivery of the
compressor to the site.
* We haven,t yet had any contact with the agency after the discussion last
Monday.
;
;
;
;

;
;


Andrea,

It's fine with me. Few points:

1. As a courtesy to Maureen Raymond, please, discuss the timing with her.

2. Yana is not a member of the Analyst/Associate pool. THIS IS NOT A ROTATION.
     She was hired directly and   this means that we transfer her
     permanently to your unit.

Vince

Andrea V Reed
12/05/2000 01:14 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Yana Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Yana Kristal's Rotation

I spoke to Yana today and understand that you are supportive of Yana rotating
through our group, EIM Fundamental Analysis.  We are very pleased that Yana
will be joining us.  Her skill set will be particularly helpful as we build
the steel business.

I was hoping that Yana could begin working with us mid December.   Does a
start date in EIM of Dec. 18 work for you?  Please let me know.

Once again, thank you for your support.

Andrea


Does any of this impact the Central Desk?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 07:17
AM ---------------------------

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/21/2000 04:21:43 PM
To: " - *chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *dick.jenkins@enron.com" <dick.jenkins@enron.com>
Subject: market exits

Chris,

As I indicated on our call about a week ago, CES Retail is attempting to exit
a
number of current markets for Major Accounts business only.  The list that
we're contemplating includes CKY, CG&E, DP&L, East Ohio, Indiana Gas, Western
Kentucky, CVA, COH, and BGE.  Again, for those LDCs where we participate in
Choice programs, we will continue to serve those customers.

We are trying to have this accomplished prior to March flow so that we can
take
March 2000 forward out of our physical requirements from Enron.

I'll keep you apprised as additional information becomes available.

Thanks,

Melissa


I still think an additional organizational announcement is necessary- I can
explain further when you so desire. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001
04:20 PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
04/11/2001 04:15 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

From: Enron Europe Office of the Chairman@ECT on 04/11/2001 05:37 AM
Please respond to Enron Europe Office of the Chairman
Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement@ECT
To: ECT Asia Pacific, ECT Dubai, ECT Europe, Enron VPs and MDs 1, Enron VPs
and MDs 2, Enron Executive Committee
cc:

Subject: Enron Europe Regulatory Affairs Announcement

After nearly five years in London, Mark Schroeder will be returning to the US
on April 11th to join the North American Coal Business with responsibility
for origination in the utility sector.  Under Mark,s leadership, his team has
made significant contributions towards Enron Europe,s &first mover8 advantage
and its status as the leading new entrant in the liberalizing pan-European
energy markets.  We wish him well in his new commercial role.

With Mark,s departure, the day-to-day management of the Government &
Regulatory Affairs Department in Europe will rest with Peter Styles, Paul
Dawson, Paul Hennemeyer, and Doug Wood. Nick O,Day will continue in his
current leadership capacity in Japan.  Each of these five individuals and
their groups will now jointly report to the business heads and to Rick
Shapiro, in the Government & Regulatory Affairs team in Houston. Rick Shapiro
will continue to manage Government Affairs for the Americas.  While the team
members responsibilities will vary from time-to-time in response to shifting
commercial priorities, as well as the need to support other Enron Wholesale
Services' business units from time-to-time, the general areas of
responsibility will be as follows:

Peter Styles, based in Brussels, will continue to have responsibility for our
EU and Netherlands advocacy.  Paul Hennemeyer will lead efforts in the German
speaking countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) as well as France and
Belgium. Peter and Paul will report to Eric Shaw.  While seconded to the
commercial team in France, Philip Davies will address Nordic market issues on
an ad hoc basis and also report to Paul on these issues.

Paul Dawson will lead our UK, Spain and Italian power regulatory efforts as
well as the gas regulatory work in the UK.  Doug Wood will support the
Continental Gas team and the Central and Southeastern Europe Origination
efforts, while also addressing the UK Climate Change Levy.  Doug's role in
gas will continue to be supplement, and not to supplant, the efforts of each
of the team members' geographic responsibilities noted on the organisation
chart. Paul and Doug will report to Richard Lewis locally.

Nick O,Day will also continue to report to Joe Hirl in Japan.

Other regulatory support provided by Mark Schroeder will be addressed in
another organizational announcement that will be sent
out from Government & Regulatory Affairs in Houston.  Attached is the revised
organization chart that now reflects the Government & Regulatory Affairs
organization in Enron Europe.

John Sherriff & Michael Brown

Please click on the link below to view the Regulatory Affairs organisational
charts for Europe and Japan.

Link to organisational charts


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Rodenburg, Eric" <erodenbu@UtiliCorp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 11:05 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; Carr, James; Blair, Jean; Wilkens, Jerry; Clapper, Karen; Washington, Kathy; Callans, Nancy; Bryan, Randy; Walden, Shirley
Subject:	SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls

 <<SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls>>   I have revised the 11th and have
included the weekend burn schedule.  Sunflower will perform a small test
today around noon using about 500 MMBtu's in that hour.

 - SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls


Is the $10,000/month scheduling fee part of the $1,193,725? Is the demand
charge for all of the reimbursements on all pipelines combined?

BF

Chris Germany
12/13/2000 03:51 PM
To: Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Power Demand Charge

I added a demand charge of $1,193,725 to deal 523459 for Dec 2000.  I don't
think this should show up in the current month P&L, at least not from this
deal ticket.

Let me know if there are any problems.

This demand charge is for the Market East and for the $10,000/month
scheduling fee.  We are still working on the East demand charges for New
Power.


CERA Alert: December 15, 2000

Title: Refined Products Line--North American Markets
CERA Knowledge Areas: Refined Products

US Margin Highlights
* Responding to falling apparent demand and rising primary inventory levels,
US Gulf Coast unleaded gasoline margins versus WTI fell by $2.26 per barrel
to average $1.45 per barrel during November. Gasoline margins have returned
to a historically normal range after spending the summer of 2000 at
exceptionally high values. CERA expects gasoline margins to WTI to average
$2.75 per barrel during the first quarter of the New Year, $1.16 per barrel
lower than this year's first quarter average.

* High sulfur No. 2 fuel oil differentials with WTI dropped slightly,
averaging $5.97 per barrel in November. Despite the drop of $0.37 per barrel
from October's average, fuel oil differentials remain at unprecedented
values-$4.20 per barrel higher than a year ago and $3.46 per barrel greater
that the previous five-year average. For the first quarter of 2001, CERA
anticipates distillate margins to moderate somewhat but remain at a record
high level of $4.75 per barrel in the first quarter.

* Jet/kerosene differentials versus WTI rose $0.63 per barrel from the
October average, reaching a whopping $8.59 per barrel in November. In
correspondence with the distillate market, jet/kerosene margins are at
historically high levels and receiving support from relatively tight
fundamentals. CERA expects jet/kerosene margins to moderate somewhat in the
first quarter in response to seasonal weakening of demand following the
holiday travel season but to remain exceptionally strong at an average of
$5.75 per barrel.

* Margins for US Gulf Coast 1% sulfur residual fuel dropped by $2.15 per
barrel, reaching $3.99 per barrel below WTI during November. Despite the
recent widening of differentials, CERA expects soaring natural gas prices to
support relatively narrow residual fuel differentials throughout the winter
months. Residual fuel differentials are expected to average $2.50 per barrel
below WTI during the first quarter of next year, at the high end of the
historical range.

US Demand Highlights
* Apparent demand for unleaded gasoline fell seasonally by about 0.5 million
barrels per day (mbd) from the October level, reaching 8.36 mbd for the four
weeks ending December 8. Demand is averaging less than 1 percent below last
year largely because Y2K concerns helped inflate December demand a year ago.
CERA anticipates gasoline demand to continue to decline seasonally as colder
temperatures arrive, averaging 8.08 mbd during the first quarter of 2001.

* Reported distillate apparent demand remains exceptionally strong at 3.94
mbd for the four weeks ending December 8, over 7 percent greater than this
time last year. This represents a slight increase of about 0.05 million
barrels (mb) from the end-October level of 3.90 mb, but still a record high
level for early December. With support from low home heating oil inventories,
particularly in the Northeast, distillate demand has been very strong during
the fall of 2000. CERA expects demand to remain strong in the coming winter
months, averaging 3.79 mb during the first quarter of next year.

* Apparent demand for jet fuel declined by 5 percent from the October level
to reach 1.68 mbd for the four weeks ending December 8. Despite the decline,
apparent jet fuel demand is over 1 percent above the year-ago level. The
relative strength of jet fuel reported demand continues to parallel
distillate demand strength with support coming from the use of jet fuel to
help mitigate the tight distillate market fundamentals. CERA expects the
demand for jet fuel to average 1.81 mb during the fourth quarter.

* Reported demand for residual fuel dropped to 0.87 mbd for the four weeks
ending December 8, a decline of about 0.09 mbd from the October average and a
slight increase over the November level. Demand for residual fuel is
currently 11 percent greater than last year, and surging natural gas prices
are expected to result in continued strong residual fuel demand throughout
the winter. Residual fuel demand is expected to remain in the 0.85 to 0.9 mbd
range during the first quarter of 2001.

US Inventory Highlights
* Primary inventories of unleaded gasoline rose to 196.5 mb, increasing
almost 10 mb from the end-October value. Responding to rising stock levels
and declining apparent demand, forward supply coverage of gasoline climbed to
23.5 days for the four weeks ending December 8. Forward supply is 2.5 percent
below last year's level at this time of year and at its lowest level in the
past eight years-although CERA still believes coverage is currently
sufficient for the level of demand expected this winter. However, CERA is
looking cautiously at the implications of high distillate refinery yields and
production because of the possibility of low gasoline inventories at the
start of the driving season in the second quarter of next year.

* Distillate inventory coverage has remained about level since the end of
October at 29.2 days of forward supply for the four weeks ending December 8.
Despite record high apparent demand, strong refinery production levels helped
boost primary distillate inventories slightly, to 115.3 mb for this period.
Primary stocks are 16 percent below last year's level at this time and at
their lowest historical level ever. Although stocks are low, CERA does not
anticipate shortages to occur this winter. Assuming normally cold weather,
refinery production and net imports are expected to be capable of meeting
demand requirements-albeit at a high price.

* Jet fuel inventory coverage crept upward by about 1 day of coverage, to
reach 25.7 days of forward supply for the four weeks ending December 8. This
moves jet fuel coverage above the 23.5 to 25 days' supply range that it had
been in for the past four months. The rise of just under 1 day in forward
supply was mainly a response to a decline in apparent demand. Jet inventories
and coverage are expected to become tighter in the coming weeks as the pull
from tight distillate markets strengthen, but supplies are expected to be
adequate for the winter.

* Inventory coverage of residual fuel rose by almost 4 days of forward supply
from October, reaching 41.7 days of forward supply during the four weeks
ending December 8. The increase in coverage was a temporary response to a
drop in demand and an increase in stocks. With demand expected to strengthen
because of colder weather and high gas prices, CERA looks for inventories and
coverage gradually to decline in the coming weeks.

**end**

This CERA Alert will be available in PDF format within 24 hours.

**********************************************************************
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Please note that I will be out of the on Tuesday, July 11th  through Friday,
July 14th.  I will return on Monday the 17th.  In my absense, my desk will be
covered as follows:

Tom Acton:
980067 Lonestar Katy----daily confirmations
980072 Aquila Header--daily confirmations
980069 Trunkline--daily confirmations
986780 Oasis Katy--daily confirmations
Oneok transport--daily scheduling
Western transport--daily scheduling
Midcon transport--daily scheduling

Carlos Rodriguez:
Lonestar Pipe Line--offsystem scheduling/pathing
Midcon Pipe Line--offsystem scheduling/pathing
Dow Pipe Line--offsystem scheduling/pathing

Eddie Janzen/Mary Poorman:
Oasis Pipe Line--offsystem nominations/scheduling/pathing

Thanks,
Mark
x33396


Mary Hain has resigned her position with Enron.  Please remove her from all
your mail lists.

Thank you.

Lysa Akin
Gov't Affairs - Sr. Admin. Ass't.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Grant, Colleen" <CGrant@caiso.com>
03/23/2001 01:18 PM

Please respond to "Fuller, Don" <DFuller@caiso.com>
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:
Subject: CAISO NOTICE: ISO 2001 Demand Program Update

Market Participants:

The ISO provides this update regarding the Summer 2001 Demand Relief Program
and the Discretionary Load Curtailment Program.  The ISO intends to issue
new solicitations for both programs in the next 1 1/2 weeks.

Two additional RFBs for the Demand Relief Program, one for Loads only and
one for Loads with back-up generators, are scheduled for issuance early next
week with bids due May 1.  They will be posted to our website and noticed by
email.  Based on ISO Governing Board approval on May 10, these Loads will
begin participation in the Demand Relief Program on either June 1 or July 1,
as feasible.

The ISO Governing Board recently approved the design structure of the ISO
Discretionary Load Curtailment Program.  This program will be operable
year-round.  The ISO plans to issue the formal RFP in the next 1 1/2 weeks.
Proposals will be accepted from aggregators on an ongoing basis.

Additional details (subject to some change) can be found in Attachment A of
the ISO Management Memo to the Governing Board dated March 7, 2001 and
titled, Summer 2001 Preparedness Update and Demand Response Programs.  (Note
that pricing for the Discretionary Load Curtailment Program could be
modified in the final design; the ISO expects to initiate the program in the
$250-$500/MWh price range.)

Don Fuller
Director, Client Relations


I am forwarding to you a paper by some UT professors.
They approached us about the possibility of licensing this technology to us.

Under the nondisclosure agreement, we have to give them an answer in 90 days
and tell them why we don't want to use it (if we decline the offer).

Please, don't circulate the paper to other members of the group without
letting them know that it's confidential and should not leave Enron.
In any case, please, let me know who else saw the paper.
We should make sure that the circulation is limited so that it does not
leak out.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000
02:29 PM ---------------------------

"Stathis Tompaidis" <Stathis.Tompaidis@bus.utexas.edu> on 08/02/2000 02:18:33
PM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: "Sheridan Titman" <Sheridan.Titman@bus.utexas.edu>, "Stathis Tompaidis"
<Stathis.Tompaidis@bus.utexas.edu>
Subject: Confidential: valuation of collateralized mortgages

Dear Vince,

we have just received the signed confidentiality agreement. According to
the terms in the agreement, I am sending you an attachment with the pdf
file of the paper discussing the valuation of collateralized debt. We
would be glad to discuss further about a possible collaboration at your
convenience.

Please let me know if you have any trouble deciphering the attachment.

With best regards,
Stathis

Stathis Tompaidis
Assistant Professor
MSIS Department, CBA 5.202
McCombs School of Business
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78752-1175
Tel. 512-4715252
Fax. 512-4710587
Stathis.Tompaidis@bus.utexas.edu

 - paper.pdf


Just wanted to check on how the financials are going.  My goal is to get
everything ready no later than the first week of June so I can problem solve
before I have to file by June 11th.  When the financials are ready I need to
get them certified by the highest accounting officer.  Last year that was
Drew Lynch who signed as Vice President, Business Analysis and Reporting.
Will he be signing again?


Michelle,

The name of the DB Administrator for Enpower is Charlene Fricker,
5-3487. Alex will contact her regarding the access to the curve.

I think it's a problem many layers below Gary Hickerson's level
of responsibility and I hope we can handle it without using his valuable
time.

Vince


Immediately following meeting, there will be a group luncheon outside of office.  Location for lunch will be determined at a later date.


This message is intended for eHRonline users only.

Due to a recent change to eHRonline, the URL (aka "Web address") for
accessing eHRonline needs to be changed on your computer.  The change
involves adding the letter "s" to the "http" reference in the URL.  The URL
for accessing eHRonline should be:   https://eHRonline.enron.com.

This change should be made by those who have added the URL as a favorite on
the browser.


Attached is a legal memo regarding Westinghouse's delivery obligations with
respect to the 501D5A gas turbine generator package.  I will forward you an
additional copy by fax.

TFAH

 - 1199308.01


Brent,

We currently have not executed any transactions with this counter-party, but
Rob is ineterested in doing a financial deal with them once an ISDA gets put
in place. Thanks.

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
ext. 5-4563

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Hendry, Brent
Cc: Rajaram, Aparna
Subject: FW: About Coillte (http:
//www.coillte.ie/about_coillte/annual_report.htm)

Brent:  Attached is Aparna's email.  Please call her if you have any
questions.  I believe that Rob Scheuer is the commercial person.

Aparna:  Would you please advise Brent as to whether or not a transaction has
been executed.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 08:56 AM -----

	Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate 06/04/2001 08:54 AM 	   To: Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: FW: About Coillte (http:
//www.coillte.ie/about_coillte/annual_report.htm)

Sara,

Here is the link to the Irish entity I just spoke to you about. The Lumber
Group is looking to get an ISDA in place with this entity but I wanted to get
your input on the legal side on an entity that is probably 100% owned by the
Irish Govt.

www.coillte.ie

Thanks for your help!

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
ext. 5-4563


Hi everyone!

I have begun to document all special situations and counterparties that are
exceptions to our "not to be confirmed" rules.  Thus, in the future, when we
need to answer questions regarding why certain deals are unconfirmed, there
will be no confusion about where the directives not to do so originated.

Please review this document carefully.  Go ahead and make any changes that
you'd like -but please change your font color so that I will know which items
you have added.  I will incorporate all of your edits to the master document
and save it to a common drive where it can be accessed and updated whenever
necessary.

If you can think of any additional "not to be confirmed"
exceptions/situations, or more specific details  -please add them.  Please
let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks for your input,
Kimberly Hundl x31647


fyi - we are finally getting to a point where we can spend some time looking
at the numbers to determine what some of the trends are.  We will be sending
this to Louise/Dave to highlight some of those that may require commercial
intervention.
Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 01:34
PM ---------------------------

Torrey Moorer
08/24/2000 04:47 PM
To: Sheri Thomas
cc:
Subject: Trend Analysis for Select Commodity Groups

Attached is a trend analysis on the four primary commodity groups which have
either been demonstrating, or have been thought to be demonsrating, a decline
in EOL transactions as a percentage of total trading activity. The graphs for
each group represent a line plot of EOL's weekly percentage of total trading
activity by deal count and volume over the last three months. The attachment
also contains source data on the second and third pages, which gives the
absolute numbers represented by the percentages shown on the graphs. These
sheets contain several additional commodity groups which have demonstrated a
decreasing or erratic EOL trend, but were not graphed because they averaged
less than 10-15 total transactions (both EOL and non-EOL) per week.

A few notes on the four graphed commodity groups:

AUSTRIAN POWER -  The overall EOL trend as a percentage of transactions in
Austrian Power has been upward over the last three months, despite the sharp,
temporary decrease which took place at the end of July as a result of the
head Austrian Power Trader and Stack Manager going on holiday. Since his
return, the percentage has picked back up and as of 8/22 about 30% of
Austrian Power trades were once again being done through EOL. There is cause
for concern here, however, in the fact that the absence of one trader
effectively shut off EOL trading in this commodity group.

LPG - The LPG products have followed a somewhat erratic path since inception,
with EOL transactions typically accounting for between 20 and 30 percent of
total LPG trading activity. This overall trend remains intact and as of 8/22,
EOL accounted for 26% of LPG trades.

Crude & Products - This commodity group has been demonstrating a steady
decline in EOL trading activity over the last three months. While EOL trades
accounted for approximately 20% of all crude and products activity in May,
this percentage has dropped off to just over 10% as of August 22nd. This
trend is particularly disturbing because of its consistancy, as well as the
relatively large data pool on which it is based.

UK Power - Although the absolute number of trades in UK Power dropped off
significantly at the end of July, EOL's percentage of UK Power transactions
has remained fairly stable. EOL's percentage of UK Power trades "spiked"
briefly during the second week of June, but outside of this the percentage of
UK Power trading represented by EOL transactions has fluctuated between 20
and 40 percent. On trade date 8-22, EOL transactions accounted for just over
50% of all transactions done in UK Power.


sorry Friday, 3/9

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/12/2001 10:52 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

what was the trade date on this?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 08:58 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing deal?

Prebon sent over a confirm for a deal where:
Enron (Mike Swerzbin) buys from PPL Montana Cal'04-Cal'06 25 mw of Mid-C at
$45.00 off-peak hours.

They did not tell me about this deal during checkout.  Can you please check
with Mike.

Thanks!!


Vince, I am waiting to hear back from our compliance department on this.  I
will get you the info as soon as I rec. it.  I mailed the receipt for the
deposit today.

David C. Walkup
Sr. Financial Consultant
713-658-1685
800-456-9712

> ----------
> From:  Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com[SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent:  Tuesday, December 19, 2000 11:09 AM
> To:  David_Walkup@ML.com
> Cc:  Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> Subject:  Cusip
>
> David,
>
> The CUSIP of the bond I have is  694308EF0
> PGC  8.375%  5/1/25 1st & Ref Mortgage bond, ser 92B.
>
>
> Vince
>
>
____________________________________________________________

CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
be intercepted by a third party.  For your protection, avoid sending
identifying information, such as account, Social Security or card numbers to
us or others.  Further, do not send time-sensitive, action-oriented
messages, such as transaction orders, fund transfer instructions, or check
stop payments, as it is our policy not to accept such items electronicall


Good Morning!

FYI - Cheryl will not be in today, due to an unexpected delay in her
schedule.  She will return to the office tomorrow morning.  Should you need
assistance, feel free to contact me directly at 5-3317.  Thank you for your
attention to this matter.

Regards,
Keegan


GE form contract, 1 1/2 hours.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/05/2000 10:46 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Meeting you requested for today

What is the meeting regarding and how much time do you need?


i forgot i have a broker from bloomberg in town the same night so if it's
cool with you then dinner is on him.  i'm going to make reservations for 3
at ivy on the shore.....

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim.Ward@enron.com [mailto:Kim.Ward@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 8:07 AM
To: estrickland@mieco.com
Subject: RE:

What is the next closest airport.  No direct flights from San Jose.  I
think dinner at Ivy on the Shore is in order.  I will tell me boss Barry he
is out of luck and on his own!


The report named: DPR - Concentration <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=48&report_name=DPR+-+Concentration&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/21/2001>, published as of 11/21/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.