Susie,

Yes, you have been missed at the last couple of events!  I hear you have
your head burried in Enron.  No fun!!!!  I hope that you are getting paid
overtime or compensated in some way for all of your efforts!

Things have been going really great here - still planning for the wedding
and trying not toget too anxious and enjoy all of the engagement time!  The
shower was fun to get Christmas stuff - unfortunately, most of it is packed
up in boxes because I wanted to save it for next year (the 1st).  Some
stuff though, I just couldn't help it.  About all of this football stuff -
thank goodness the season is nearing a finale.  The weekend trips were
gettting a little intense.  We have to go to a wedding on the 29th, so not
sure what he is going to do for the game.  Supposedly Boyd is going to the
wedding too and they are going to sneak to the hotel bar to catch a
glimpse.

My family is doing great!  I just heard word that my brother is coming in
the entire week before the wedding so we can hang out and he is coming for
the engagement party!  (They recently moved to Philadelphia and are not
coming home for Christmas, so whenever I hear of him coming, I get so
excited!)

Good luck with all of your stuff - don't miss Christmas!  :o)

Love you and I miss seeing you!!!

Love, Lisa

<Susan.M.Scott@enron.com> on 12/12/2000 09:56:37 AM

To:   jkbowles@hotmail.com, JesPulliam@aol.com, Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com,
      emily.boon@msdw.com, edrington@uthscsa.edu
cc:
Subject:  Hi girls...

As it appears I will be living and breathing the 32nd floor of the Enron
building well through the first of the year, I've decided to break down and
try to maintain my friendships via email.  You all know me well enough to
know that this a huge step on my part ( I am not the world's best emailer).
Anyway, I feel like I'm out of touch with what's going on in your
collective lives and am thus missing out on some pretty wonderful, exciting
and special things.  So when and if any of you get a chance shoot me back a
quick note and let me know what's new in your life.

Love you guys,
Susan

Jennifer - Hope work is going well.  I know this time of year has got to be
crazy for anyone in your line of work, but I'm sure you're handling it
well.  We really need to go grab coffee, dinner, a movie or something soon.
I'm in need of a good chat.

Jessica - I know you're in the midst of finals right now and probably about
to pull your hair out.  Just focus on the fact that they'll be over soon
and you'll be off to London to see Ashley and Lee ( I am so jealous).
Please tell Clay I say hello and wish him good luck as well on y'alls
exams.

Lisa - Hey sweetie!  I am so sorry I couldn't make it to your shower in SA,
but Jen said it went really well.  We need to get together soon I've missed
seeing you and especially hearing about the wedding and all the fun goings
ons in your life.  Tell Brad I say "Hi" and I'll be glued to the TV set
just like him on the on the 29th rooting on the Horns.

Emily - I really want to hear how your Thanksgiving went with Thomas and
the "Fam".  Knowing Thomas it went great and your entire family (especially
your Mom) is absolutely in love with him.  Keep me posted on your plans for
the future ( I'm curious where you're going to end up geographically).
Also, I thought you'd find it interesting that I may have an opportunity to
work in your old hometown - Chicago.  Any thoughts?

Elizabeth - I have really been out of touch with you and I am very mad at
myself for letting that happen.  Please write back soon and let me know how
school, your family and this new man in your life ( okay, I'm not
completely out of touch) are all doing.  My guess is you're going through
exams as well right now so I'll wish you the best of luck and infinite
success.


Dan, here is information about the recordings which were
located by the landman, Robert Dossett, who researched the
Campbell County real property records for recordings against
T48N, R72W, Section 16 involving Enernet and Quantum:

1.  Mortgage, Security Agreement, Financing Statement and
Assignment from Enernet of Wyoming, L.L.C. to BancFirst,
Oklahoma City, OK.  Reception No. 751085, Book 1558,
pages 411 through 417.  Recorded August 23, 1999 in the
Campbell County Records.

2.  UCC Financing Statement between Enernet of Wyoming,
L.L.C. as Debtor and Bancfirst as Secured Party, filed in the
Campbell County UCC records on August 24, 1999,
#U224472.

3.  Model Form Recording Supplement to Operating
Agreement and Financing Statement between Enernet of
Wyoming, LLC as "Operator" and the following as
"non-Operators":  Michael L. Pinnell, Gregg B. Colton, Don J.
Colton, John Oliver Anderson, and Quantum Energy LLC,
executed for the stated purpose of "imparting notice to all
persons of the rights and obligaitons of the parties under the
Operating Agreement [dated 07/02/98] and for the further
purpose of perfecting those rights capable of perfecction.
Recorded Campbell County Records January 14, 2000,
Reception No. 757472, Book 1581, Pages 663 through 674.

4.  Model Form Recording Supplement to Operating
Agreement and Financing Statement between Enernet of
Wyoming LLC and Quantum Energy LLC as agent for 1997-A
Drilling Program, 1998-A Drilling Program, Quaneco I
Program, Quaneco II Program and Bonepile 16th Well
Program.  Same form as the Model Form described above.
RecordedCampbell County Records, March 3, 2000,
Reception No. 759509, Book 1589, Pages 310 through 314.

Those were all of the recordings located by the landman.  I
will put copies in the mail to you today.  Please let me know
whether you need copies sooner than that.  Thanks for your
patience while this information was being gathered.  Please
call with any questions on the recordings.  Thanks, Dan.


Dear Amazon.com Customer,

We hope your holiday season was as exciting as ours was... though
we're not through just yet. Join us for our huge Clearance event and
save up to 50% on toy and kitchen items, up to 70% on select books,
and much, much more.

http://www.amazon.com/clearance

Plus, if you'd like to clear out some of your own post-holiday
clutter, we've made it easy to sell the used items you no longer
want. Make money in just a few simple steps: you list it, we sell
it, you ship it, and you get paid!

Visit our Clearance event today. With our outlet prices and huge
selection, you can save money and make money on great items in every
store.

http://www.amazon.com/clearance

Sincerely,

Amazon.com Outlet Team

We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather
not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please
visit the Help page Updating Subscriptions and Communication
Preferences through the link below, then click the Customer
Communication Preferences link.

http://www.amazon.com/unsubscribe

Please note that this message was sent to the following e-mail
address:

tkuyken@enron.com


Below is a list of attorneys that are visiting the Houston office prior to
the ENA Legal Conference.

Atty	Home Location	Ext.	Office
Justin Boyd	London	(713) 345-2520	EB3808
Rahul Saxena	London	(713) 345-2678	EB3807
Mathew Dawson	London	(713) 345-2680	EB3812
Mark Evans	London	(713) 345-2679	EB3811A
David Minns	Australia	(713) 345-2682	EB3883
Matt Lee	Japan	(713) 345-2681	EB3828
Limor Nissan	New York	(713) 345-2683	EB3891
Alison Moss	Teesside	(713) 345-2722	EB3858F


Greg,

Attached for your review and further handling the Draft Interconnect
Agreement with Brazos Valley Project, L.P. and HPL.

Thanks & have a great weekend,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Maureen,

The article for Technical Corner requires some editorial work.
Please, make sure you make the changes ASAP.

My comments are in magenta. You will see them when you open the attachment.

Vince


Greetings WellesleyTeam!!

I would like to first take the time to thank everyone for there dedication
and support.  We extended 7 offers and we had 3 accepts, 1 decline, and 3
outstanding.

Now, it is time to prepare for the Spring recruiting season.  Below I have
attached the team strategy for the Spring recruiting.  Please review the
strategy and if you have a conflict with the event you are scheduled for
please call or e-mail me immediately so that I can find a replacement.

Thanks, Geynille


See Attached. sj


Vice:

I interviewed Nelson last week. Here is my feedback:

 1) Very communicative
 2) Good professional experience - works as a consultant
 3) Good quantitative background

He lacks a background in finance, which may be a minus for a position in the
group. I beleive he may be valuable for other areas that deal with emissions
and pollutants.
Paulo Issler


Here is the information requested.

Thanks,

LaShonda V. LaDay
713-853-4227


We are now the "ENRON 400" and have been officially notified that we have
earned first position in the Super Team Start.  That means we are the very
first out the gate again this year!  AWESOME !  Thanks to all of you for your
recruiting efforts. We've gained 125 riders from last year.  MEET YOUR TEAM
IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TULLY STADIUM.

To start this adventure, just show up with your bike and all your gear at
Tully Stadium, I-10 & Dairy Ashford no later than 6:00 AM on Saturday, the
15th.  The feeder road going east on I-10 from Dairy Ashford leads you to
Tully Toad, dedicated as a one-way street that morning.  Turn right onto
Tully and enter Tully Stadium grounds in the first 3 gates.  No vehicles of
any kind  will be allowed into the parking lot from Dairy Ashford, so save
yourself some time and just follow the crowd in from the feeder road.
Please park your vehicle and then go ask questions if needed so that you
don't jam up the entrance.  There are 3 drop-off points for your luggage.
Each rider should have 2 luggage tags which are the same numbers as your
helmet and bike numbers.

6:15 AM Team Picture (Southeast Corner of Parking Lot - in the Stadium)
6:30 AM Stage for Exit (Northwest Corner of Parking Lot)
7:00 AM The "Enron 400" out the gate!

(You have a Tully Stadium map in your rider manual)

The Top Team Start will be at 7:00 AM, staging at 6:30 AM, and it's very
important to be there on time.  If you're not in the staging area in time for
our start, you'll be stuck back with the crowd and it could take you as long
as two hours to get out the gate.  Allow enough time to park, unload luggage,
and get geared up, remembering that the freeway will be jammed up even that
early.   We want you there for the team picture, and we don't want to leave
without you, so please be there plenty early (I recommend arriving at 5:30
AM).  Please wear your Enron jersey the first day.  This helps us to quickly
identify who should be starting with us.  I did consent to let five IZUZU
riders start with us.  Since they're sponsoring the whole event, I figured
you guys wouldn't mind.  So just be nice!

If you have any questions about any of this, please email me or call me at
713-646-6569.  I'll be out of the office the rest of this week in attending a
conference,  but will be checking messages and email when possible.  My home
number is 713-977-1527 and cell phone is 713-503-6313.  On Friday I'm picking
up my kids who are flying in and getting their bikes ready, etc., but call if
you need anything.


We are getting close on this one relating to the Blue Dog turbines.  I'm
reviewing these drafts in detail, and expect that there will be another
turn.  Just wanted to give you a heads up.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2001 03:00
PM ---------------------------

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 04/11/2001 08:27:55 PM
To: "'JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com'" <JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com>,
"'Michael.Young@northwestern.com'" <Michael.Young@northwestern.com>,
"'MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com'" <MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com>
cc: "'Chris.Booth@enron.com'" <Chris.Booth@enron.com>,
"'Ben.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.Jacoby@enron.com>, "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'"
<Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: ENA/NorthWestern: Revised Letter Agreement and Exhibits

I am attaching for your review marked and clean copies of the following
documents:

1. Letter Agreement between Enron North America Corp. and NorthWestern
Generation I, LLC;
2. ENA Promissory Note (Exhibit A);
3. First Amended and Restated LLC Agreement (Exhibit C);
4. Escrow Agreement (Exhibit F); and
5. ENA Guaranty (Exhibit G).

In addition, I am attaching a preliminary draft of Enron's form of
Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Exhibit B) with the caveat that the
document remains subject to changes pending further review by Enron.  Please
note that I am not attaching (1) a copy of the GE Guaranty (Exhibit E)
because we are satisfied with Paul Hasting's draft of this document and (2)
the LLC Promissory Note (Exhibit D) because Marguerite will circulate this
document as soon as she is done preparing it.

Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Marisa Reuter
King & Spalding
1100 Louisiana, Suite 3300
713-751-3244 (tel)
713-276-7440 (fax)

 <<LetterAgreement.DOC>>  <<MarkedLetterAgreement.DOC>>  <<ENANote.DOC>>
<<MarkedENANote.DOC>>  <<LLCAgmt.DOC>>  <<MarkedLLCAgmt.DOC>>
<<EscrowAgmt.DOC>>  <<MarkedEscrowAgmt.DOC>>  <<ENAGuaranty.DOC>>
<<MarkedENAGuaranty.DOC>>  <<Assignment&AssumptionAgmt.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - LetterAgreement.DOC
 - MarkedLetterAgreement.DOC
 - ENANote.DOC
 - MarkedENANote.DOC
 - LLCAgmt.DOC
 - MarkedLLCAgmt.DOC
 - EscrowAgmt.DOC
 - MarkedEscrowAgmt.DOC
 - ENAGuaranty.DOC
 - MarkedENAGuaranty.DOC
 - Assignment&AssumptionAgmt.DOC


Start Date: 12/27/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122702.txt


Please see my comments to the attached GE TPA which John sent out on May
22nd.  In it Ihave asked John to get Rose Engeldorf's comments on the "Misc
Reps & Warranties" as I am unsure that they can be provided by E-Next as
currently drafted.

I look forward to receiving the next turn with my comments incorporated or an
email sooner if possible addressing the questions I posed therein.  If there
are any questions of me first, please call.


Jeff, I'm sorry my parents did that last night.  I will ask them not to do
that again.  And I am not upset about us not getting married or moving in
together.  I would like for our relationship to evolve and grow into
something like that.  All I was saying is that we have a communication
problem if you think we've talked about it and I don't think we have.  If I
ever thought you wanted me to move in with you, I would have done it.  That
has nothing to do with selling my house.  But I'm not upset about it either.
You seem to be putting a lot of words in my mouth in this email about what I
want that I'm not telling you about and none of it is true.

But most importantly, I was NOT calling you a liar or an asshole.  When I
said honest, I was talking about being straightforward and communicating in
a way that doesn't make me have to guess what you're really saying.  It had
nothing to do with lying and I never accused you of lying.  I hope you
understand that.  And I certainly never EVER called you an asshole last
night.  Jeff, I really don't think this has to be an argument.  But it's
very sad to me that you don't think we care enough about each other to be
committed to this relationship.  That's a pretty serious blow.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 9:17 AM
To: Prentice Sellers
Subject: Re: I'm sorry

Prentice:
I'm happy to talk.  However, if you're unhappy because 1) I haven't asked
you to marry me, or 2) I haven't asked you to move in together, or 3) I
haven't asked you to have children, then you need to say so.  I'm very
upset to think that the only time I hear what you feel, or what your mother
believes you feel, or what your father believes you feel, is when we're
having dinner with your parents and they impose their limited view of our
relationship on the situation.  I'm not interested in debating my personal
relationship with you with your parents as a substitute for our
communicating---that's not a relationship.  Nor am I interested in living
my life according to what your parents or my parents or anyone else's
parents wish they'd done.  If I had ever had someone call you the way
Cameron called me on Saturday night, you would have screamed at me for
days.  Yet, when it's the other way, there's always a difference, always a
reason.  It seems like rather than communicate we are continually engaged
in a rhetorical exercise.  It 's very upsetting, and it's the sort of
one-way street that has me so deeply depressed about how we interact.

If you feel that I'm dishonest, or too dominant or not committed to the
relationship, then you need to say so---I shouldn't have to hear it in
vague terms from your parents over dinner.  And if you want to move in
together, or get married, or have children, then perhaps it would be
constructive for you to say so, and offer ways in which we would make that
happen.  From my perspective, all you've ever considered is 1) not selling
your house---for a variety of reasons that I don't understand or 2) buying
another place with Cameron.  But I'm not dating you and your sister, I'm
dating you.  So it seems to me that if you were committed to it, you would
search a solution.  Instead, it seems to me, none of those things occur,
but I'm an asshole for not having moved in with you, or married you or had
children with you.  That's lose-lose and everyone can call me an asshole,
but it won't change things.

It seems to me that two things have to happen for people to make a
commitment.  First, they have to care for each other, and the way we
interact, it's hard to say objectively that we pass that hurdle.  You have
frequently asked your parents to stop arguing, that it upsets you too much,
but that's what we spend most of our time doing.  Second, each person has
to be emotionally mature enough to undertake the responsibilities that come
with the commitment.  I've always wanted to be your partner, not your older
brother, and not your father.  I want an equal partnership where both
individuals are pouring into the relationship, even when it's difficult,
even when it's inconvenient.   If you're looking for a different dynamic in
a relationship, then we need to get it clear.  I don't think we pass these
two hurdles and so I don't think we're quite ready for the commitment,
though I've been working hard at trying to get there, and think we could.
But if we're not ready, I'm not going to do it to please your parents or my
parents or anyone else.

We can talk all day long about what an asshole I am, but I'm not willing to
do that anymore.  And if that's a requirement, then I will fail and we
shouldn't waste our time.  It takes two, pure and simple.  I'm very sorry
that work is overwhelming right now and that I go to school and am in the
process of fulfilling something I've always wanted to do--have property on
the coast.  If you feel that we can't have the relationship you want or
need because of my schedule, then you need to tell me.

If you want to talk about these issues, that's great, but I just feel that
"you never said this,"  and "no, this is what I said," and all the spinning
and debating is a diversion that doesn't get to the real issues.   I was
very upset that after the conversation we had with your parents, which I am
very unhappy about, you call to me I lied  about something.  After this
long, if you want to discuss my dishonesty, then I think we need to take a
hard look at why we're in this at all.  So I'm happy to talk, but not on
the phone, and not about who's the bigger asshole, or who's a lying
son-of-a-bitch.


Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 12:16 PM -----

	James E Keller@EES
	05/27/2001 07:44 PM

		 To: Deborah Culver/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EWS/EES

Attached are the current plan & deal status.

 Jim


Thanks again.

Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com> on 08/18/2000 10:31:52 AM
To: jdasovic@enron.com
cc: MDay@GMSSR.com
Subject: Re: Enron's Amendments to the Alpert Bill

I have been told by the author's office that the Assembly is not going to
bring
up the bill today.  Governor Davis is having a signing ceremony in Los Angeles
today for the new Caesar Chavez holiday so many of the latino members are out.
They need these members, baring a sudden change of heart by the Republican's,
in order to achieve a 2/3 vote.  However, the bill is still on file for
concurrence so we will monitor.  I'll let Sandi know.

Scott

jdasovic@enron.com wrote:

> Thanks a million.  That's not good that they don't intend to take a
> position on the bill, since what happens in S.D. could end up happening
> later behind PG&E and Edison, which could affect them significantly and
> negatively.  You may want to mention this to Sandi, who may want to follow
> up with Babs.  Thanks again for your help.  Any word on whether the
> Assembly is going to act today, and what they might act upon?
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
> Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com> on 08/18/2000 09:21:58 AM
>
> To:   jdasovic@enron.com, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Enron's Amendments to the Alpert Bill
>
> Done.  Per Barbara Barkovich, she believes that the 20kw dividing line is
> too
> low, that in fact many of the businesses the legislators say are going
> broke
> are over 20kw.  This doesn't matter to them, but it was just an
> observation.
> More importantly, they don't have any members in San Diego and are
> therefore
> not taking any positions on San Diego specific bills.  If it goes statewide
> she'll revisit it.  No word from Dorothy yet.
>
> Scott
>
> jdasovic@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Hi Scott:
> > Sandi, Paul, Jim and I spoke yesterday and thought it would be a good
> idea
> > to contact customer groups about our proposed amendments to the Alpert
> bill
> > to see if we can get some other folks to support them (which we think we
> > can).  My plan was to call them, explain what our amendments are
> attempting
> > to do and ask them to sit tight until you and Sandi contacted them.  I
> have
> > tried to get phone numbers from here in Houston but have struck out.
> Could
> > you call Bill Booth and Dorothy Rothrock and share the amendments with
> them
> > that Mike Day drafted (and ask them to sit tight until you and Sandi get
> a
> > chance to confer)?  Greatly appreciated.  If you have any questions you
> can
> > page me at 888.916.7184.  Thanks very much.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jeff


FYI ONLY

Tanya:

Lots of new activity coming out of London office for the FX desk.

Carr Futures is already an ENA clearing broker and four new agreements will
be put in place so that ENA can execute trades with the following brokers:

Goldman Sachs Int'l
JPMorganChase
Merrill Lynch Int'l
NatWest

who give the trades up to Carr to clear.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Bardal, Chelsea
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: Forwards DetailSEMPRA.xls


Slava,

Mike's phone number:

(713) 553 5883.

Vince


Hello there.  I'm not sure if you will get this or not, but I have been
trying to get in touch with you.  Nothing too important, but if you do
receive this and have the chance, would you please write me back. I hope
everyone is doing well and that you had a wonderful Thanksgiving!

Danielle

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Paul,
Thanks for the invitation but I will not be able to attend on Friday.

Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Choi, Paul
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Rosman, Stewart; Foster, Chris H.; Cocke Jr., Stanley; Rawson, Lester; Mainzer, Elliot; Dunton, Heather; Motley, Matt; Belden, Tim; Swerzbin, Mike; Wente, Laura; Richter, Jeff; Perry, Todd; Ngo, Tracy; Rance, Susan; Lackey, Chris; Buerkle, Jim; Alonso, Tom; Fischer, Mark; Etringer, Michael; Mehrer, Anna; Van Gelder, John; Cadena, Angela; Fuller, Dave; Swain, Steve; Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean; Gang, Lisa; Malowney, John; Bryson, Jesse; Fitzpatrick, Amy; Thompson, Virginia; Sheidun, Donna; Lee, Eugene; Oh, Jeffrey; Elafandi, Mo; Badeer, Robert; Gilbert, Jim; Mallory, Chris; Stokley, Chris; O'Neil, Murray P.; Calger, Christopher F.; Yoder, Christian; Williams III, Bill; Chen, Andy; Driscoll, Michael M.; Platter, Phillip; Semperger, Cara; Mays, Wayne; Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject:	Housewarming Party

We will be having a housewarming party this Friday starting around 5:30.  We will be grilling salmon, burgers, and chicken.  Also I will be opening a double magnum of chardonnay.  If you want something else to eat or drink bring it by and we will put it on the grill or ice.  Email me if you can come and how many are coming.  The following link is the directions to my place from the office:

http://www.mapquest.com/cgi-bin/mqtrip?link=btwn%2Ftwn-ddir_na_basic_main&uid=u9_787ebk8i3a5td%3Atn0z7xl6b&oabgcderr=&dabgcderr=&avoid_ferry=&avoid_lmTD_access=&avoid_toll_roads=&route_type=&results_display_mode=&LangOpt=&AB_LABELS=&WORK=&CCNA=&NADDOAH=_%23D%5E45.51590%5E-122.67490%5E%5E121+Sw+Salmon+St%5EPortland%5EOR%5E97204-2901%5E%5EUS%5E%5E&ADDR_0=&OPC=null&CITY_0=&STATE_0=&ZIP_0=&CC_0=US&NADDDAH=_%23D%5E45.51670%5E-122.76570%5E%5E8994+Nw+Kearney+St%5EPortland%5EOR%5E97229-5333%5E%5EUS%5E%5E&ADDR_1=&DPC=null&CITY_1=&STATE_1=&ZIP_1=&CC_1=US&POIRad=2.0&dir.x=70&dir.y=8

Paul


Those things are such a waste of time- trying to condense 8 points of error
and 6 weeks of trial in a 20 minute argument. Bill did a very good job. The
opposing counsel quickly reverted to personal attacks against Bill, which did
not go over well. Union's main point was that the judge wrongly applied La.
law. Two of the justices expressed doubts about Union's argument. I
personally think the choice of law argument is a weak argument for Union. The
remainder of the time was spent analizing a particular provisition of the gas
purchase agreement between Union and the utility district. In short, you
didn't miss much.


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Here ya go.  If anything is missing, please let me know.

Please make sure that you are sending it to people in your group.

Julie


Jeff,

I will be heading out to Macerich's offices to meet Macerich's management team. At that meeting, we will be discussing the outsource and the future relationship between the companies.  He would also like me to speak to his direct reports about change management and other cultural characteristics of Enron.  However, he would really like you to provide a presentation on the same general topics to the Macerich Company Conference in June.  He has heard you speak and believes your approach and perspective can benefit the conference.

Obviously, these guys are an important relationship and reference for our commercial and real estate business.

Let me know your interest.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/EES on 04/30/2001 05:05 PM ---------------------------

Angela Schwarz
04/27/2001 04:17 PM
To:	David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Macerich Conferences

these are the conferences we discussed on Thursday.    Will discuss further with you on Monday.  thanks

ams
---------------------- Forwarded by Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES on 04/27/2001 04:16 PM ---------------------------

Eric_Salo@macerich.com on 04/27/2001 02:09:53 PM
To:	aschwarz@enron.com
cc:	Arthur_Coppola@macerich.com, Rick_Bayer@macerich.com, David_Contis@macerich.com
Subject:	Macerich Conferences

Angela - thanks for making time to have dinner with us on Wednesday:  it
was great to see you.

As Art mentioned, since the time we have started working with you, we have
made frequent references to our operating teams about Enron's
accomplishments in the areas of customer excellence and employee
satisfaction.  More generally, we've held Enron out as an example of a
highly accomplished company in all the areas Macerich is currently focusing
on as an organization (operational integration, customer orientation,
scalability, change leadership, and strategic focus).

All of that being said, we would be extremely appreciative of an
opportunity to have either Jeff Skilling or Dave Delainey speak at either
of these conferences.  In any event, we're delighted that you would make an
effort to see if this can be put together.

Relative to upcoming Macerich events, there are two scheduled:

(1) University of Notre Dame Executive Education Program, May 7 - 9 in
South Bend.  The curriculum is centered on change leadership and strategic
thinking (officially "Enhanced Leadership and Strategy in the New
Economy").  Attendees include our Executive Team (Art, David, Rick,Tom, Ed,
and Larry Sidwell) and our Operating Team (17 SVPs).  There is also a
round-table discussion scheduled with our Board on May 9.

(2) Macerich's Company Conference, June 4 - 7 in Park Cities, Utah.  The
emphasis of the conference will be on our "e-Business Transformation" (more
specifically on becoming wholly integrated across functional roles,
customer facing, and highly scalable) and capturing value in our "Value
Network" (relationships we have with retailers, partners, vendors,
shoppers, etc.)  The attendees for this event include the same people at
UND as well as our managerial professionals from the malls and our
corporate offices (about 250 people, total).

Let me know if you need any additional background or information.

Eric


Would you be available to take Andrea Calo to dinner next Wednesday (the
night before the Legal Conference)?  She is coming in a day early to meet &
chat with people here.


Notice No. 01-348
October 31, 2001

To:
All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
All NYMEX ACCESS
 Electronic Traders
All NYMEX Division Members

From:
J. Robert Collins, President

Re:
NYMEX ACCESS
 Order Entry

	NYMEX Rule 6.22, "Acceptance of Orders for Entry into NYMEX
ACCESS
," specifies the requirements for placement of orders into the
ACCESS
  system for all commodities (NYMEX and COMEX Divisions).  A copy of
the Rule is attached.  Section (C) of this Rule, "Acceptance of Orders From
Customers," specifically outlines the data necessary for input/placement of
orders, while Section (D), "Order Recordation," sets forth the procedures
for handling customer orders.

	All electronic traders are required to enter the correct account
number and clearing member number for all transactions with the exception of
multiple accounts.  NYMEX Rule 6.22(E), "Special Requirements," governs the
use of the "999" designation as it relates exclusively to multiple accounts.
Compliance Staff has additionally allowed for use of the "999" or common
holding account to be used on an "intra-session" basis for any account which
had not been set up prior to or during the ACCESS
 session in progress.  Use
of the "999" or common holding account may only be engaged on a one-time
basis for any account.  Thus, if "999" is designated three times in one
session related to three separate accounts for first time use of ACCESS
,
the "999" may never be subsequently designated for purposes of placing
orders for any of the three accounts.  Any misuse of the "999" or common
holding account would constitute a violation of Rule 6.22(C).

	The ACCESS
 System has enhanced functionality regarding the input
and storage of frequently used account numbers.  Electronic trading or
clearing member firms should contact the NYMEX Customer Service Center (the
"NCSC") with any questions at (800) 438-8616.

	Any questions regarding the rule requirements cited above should be
directed to Thomas LaSala, Vice President, Compliance, at (212) 299-2897, or
David Schneiderman, Director, Trade Practice Surveillance, at (212)
299-2857.

Rule 6.22. ACCEPTANCE OF ORDERS FOR ENTRY INTO NYMEX ACCESS

 (A) DEFINITIONS-for purposes of these Rules, the following words shall have
the following definitions:

(1) "Matching System"-The NYMEX ACCESS
 programs and database that accept,
match and report executions of orders in NYMEX ACCESS
.

(2) "Strategy Pad"-The NYMEX ACCESS
 programs and database that may be used
by Electronic Traders and NYMEX ACCESS
 Operators to store orders, trading
strategies and other information, but that do not accept, match or report
execution of orders into the Matching System.

(B) No Clearing Member shall assign an account number that would accept the
entry of orders into NYMEX ACCESS
 for, or on behalf of, a customer, unless
such customer is first provided with an Electronic Trading and Order Routing
Systems Disclosure Statement in a form approved by the Exchange.

(C) ACCEPTANCE OF ORDERS FROM CUSTOMERS-No person or entity may accept an
order for execution on NYMEX ACCESS
 unless the following information is
received:

(1)   Commodity;

(2) Contract Month;

(3) Purchase or Sale;

(4) Customer Account Number (or certification that the order is for multiple
accounts to be later allocated);

(5) Quantity;

(6) Limit Price (except for stop, market discretion, MIT or market orders);

(7) Clearing Member (or certification that the order is for multiple
accounts to be later allocated);

(8) Strike prices, put or call (for options); and

(9) Any precondition for entry into the Matching System (i.e., stop, market
discretion, MIT, stop limit).

(D) ORDER RECORDATION-Immediately upon receipt, all customer orders for
execution on NYMEX ACCESS
 must be (1) entered into the Matching System or
Strategy Pad or, if such orders cannot be entered into the Matching System
or Strategy Pad within one minute of receipt, they must be (2) recorded
within one minute of receipt in non-erasable ink and time-stamped in
accordance with Rule 6.18, and entered into the Matching System or Strategy
Pad as soon as practicable.

(E) SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

(1)   For any order known to be an order for multiple accounts to be
allocated after execution, the Electronic Trader's Account Number followed
by the suffix "999" shall be entered in satisfaction of subsection (B)(4) of
this Rule.  Only a person with trading discretion over multiple accounts may
place an order with a Member Firm, Electronic Trader or NYMEX ACCESS

Operator to be allocated after execution. No Member Firm, Electronic Trader
or NYMEX ACCESS
 Operator may accept an order for allocation after execution
unless the Member Firm, Electronic Trader or NYMEX ACCESS
 Operator or their
employer has on file a prior, written procedure for the systematic and
non-preferential allocation of executions among accounts. The customer's
actual Clearing Member and Customer Account Number must be provided no later
than 8:30 a.m. following the NYMEX ACCESS
 trading session in which the
transaction was executed.

(2) No person may knowingly record false account number information in
connection with any NYMEX ACCESS
 order.

(3) Unless otherwise agreed, all orders received for execution on NYMEX
ACCESS
 shall be deemed to be cancelled if not executed during the trading
session for which they were received.


If you did not already have this spreadsheet.  Please take a look at it.  It
should improve our accuracy on wheels/import/exports.

Thanks
Bill
---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 01/11/2001
08:03 AM ---------------------------

Heather Dunton
08/03/2000 09:56 AM
To: Portland Shift, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Smith L
Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi, John
Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Murray
P O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EXPORT FEES

Attached is a spreadsheet to estimate export fees.


Taffy:
Okay with me.
Carol


Schneider, Craig would like to recall the message, "Password Security
Notice".


Dana,
Let me know when you are ready to work on the calendar.  Sorry it late.

Veronica Medrano
Sr. Accounting Clerk
(713)345-4290
veronica.medrano@enron.com


THIS MESSAGE IS FROM THE SECRETARY OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ARTIS G.
HAMPSHIRE-COWAN, ESQ:

> President Swygert asked that I forward the attached Washington Post
> article to your attention.
>
>  <<A washingtonpost.com article.doc>>

 - A washingtonpost.com article.doc


Good Morning Mark,

I have received a request for a Certificate of Incumbency demonstrating that
I am an authorized officer to execute on behalf od ENA. Laurel Adams
mentioned that you would be the appropriate person to contact. I have yet to
sign an official Certificate of Incumbency. Please advise what we need to do
to provide this document to Chali Zulu (Legal) in London, per her request
below.

Thanks,

Jorge A. Garcia
Manager- Risk Management
Enron Global Markets LLC
713/853-5596
---------------------- Forwarded by Jorge A Garcia/NA/Enron on 04/06/2001
07:23 AM ---------------------------

Chali Zulu @ ECT on 04/06/2001 05:26:47 AM
To: Jorge A Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: General Motors Credit Default Swap

Goodmorning Jorge, could yoy kindly forward me your authorised signature
sample certified by legal as Counterparties tend to ask for it.

Regards.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chali Zulu/LON/ECT on 06/04/2001 11:23
---------------------------

"Bhairo, Tanya" <tanya.bhairo@csfb.com> on 05/04/2001 17:18:18
To: "'Chali.Zulu@enron.com'" <Chali.Zulu@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: General Motors Credit Default Swap

Chali,

i) I received the two confs.

ii) Could you please forward a copy of an authorised signatory list for
Jorge Garcia? We do not have a copy on file.

Thanks and Regs
Tanya

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:    Bhairo, Tanya
> Sent:   Wednesday, April 04, 2001 3:38 PM
> To:   'Chali.Zulu@enron.com'
> Subject:   RE: General Motors Credit Default Swap
>
>
> Chali,
>
> The Business Day language issue is currently with CSFBi Legal. Since Enron
> have requested that this language be deleted, and part of the agreed
> proforma for Credit Defaults is that we include:-
>
>    Business Days: NY and London- for the purposes of Settlement, a day
> in any other jurisdiction in which Banks must be open in order to effect
> settlement of any Deliverable Obligation being delivered in the Portfolio
>
> I have escalated this to Legal and will revert as soon as I hear anything.
>
>
> With regards to Enron CO050- CSFBi 5838096- could you please forward the
> amended doc? I have not received a copy to date.
>
> Thank and Regs
> Tanya
>
>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


Hi John:

It was nice to hear from you.  I am glad that you and Angie are well.  Chris
just got back from Dallas visiting Jeff and Stacy and saw there new house.
He says that it is going to be fantastic and that they are really well.

Things are busy here too.  I am getting ready for another exhibition to open
at the end of August.  It is on early 20th century design.  I hope you will
get a chance to see it.  Chris is very excited about starting his job on
Monday.  I am really happy for him.

We stopped by Don's shop on SUnday and heard that you had been teh week
before.  We will need to ccordinate our visits so that we can all get
together.

I hope we will see you both soon!

cindi

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Griffith, John [SMTP:John.Griffith@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 9:38 AM
> To:	CStrauss@mfah.org
> Subject:
>
> Hey Cindi,
>
> How are you doing?  Sorry for the delay in getting back with you.
> Things are going well with Angie and I, just real busy.  The natural gas
> business has been fairly busy for the summer time.  The hurricane season
> is upon us.  I am sure you are excited about this time of year.  I am
> sorry we haven't sent in the form for the Droog vase.  We will get that
> to you by the 15th of August.  That check is when we usually pay out
> purchases like that.  Sorry for the delay.  I look forward to seeing you
> guys soon. Hope all is well.  That is really exciting about Chris.  Tell
> him congrats and hi.  See you soon.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
> relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and
> privileged material for the sole use of the intended
> recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the
> recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron
> Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
> and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and
> any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer
> (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding
> and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
> of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
> party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis
> of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Remarkably clear explanation.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           09/20/2000 06:48 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: LM6000 Title Transfer Question

FYI, see below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 06:43 PM
---------------------------

Matthew Tezyk@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/20/2000 06:13 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby@ECT
cc: Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: LM6000 Title Transfer Question

Ben,

Does ENA wish to accept Title of 14 LM6000's on September 26, 2000, or accept
Title of these Units after each has been issued an Inspection Acceptance
Certificate from EECC QA/QC department?

The following is a summary of the LM6000 Title Transfer Question:

Mike Storm, GE/SSEP Project Manager, requested from me, on 9/19/00, to accept
title of 14 LM6000's no later 9/26/00.  I informed him I was not authorized
to make this decision and that I would contact the Owner to make the
decision.  I further informed Mike Storm that our Owner would not accept
those terms and a compromise must be worked out.
Contract Reference 15.2.1 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: title transfers
when equipment is ready to ship to the delivery point and seller notifies
purchaser of such event.
Delivery Point is defined as the SSEP storage yard.
SSEP has notified us that Units #1-14 are "Ready to Ship".
Contract Reference 10.2.3 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: purchaser has the
right to inspect the equipment for "completeness prior to loading on
transport to delivery point".
We have inspected the first eleven Units and have informed SSEP that Units
#1-14 ARE NOT COMPLETE and therefore are NOT at the Delivery Point.
FACT: Units # 1-11 are at the delivery point. #12-14 are at SSEP.
FACT: If we sent a truck to SSEP tomorrow, NONE of the UNITS would be "Ready
to Ship" to a project site.
FACT: SSEP QA/QC has 15 Non Conformance Reports on these 14 turbines which
need to be corrected before they are "Ready to Ship".
It is in the best interests for both companies to correct the Non
Conformance's prior to shipment to the delivery point or project site.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that we DO NOT accept Title until the Units are
actually ready to be shipped to a project site.  The problem is that NONE OF
THE UNITS ARE READY TO SHIP!  SSEP has to work off punchlist items which
their QA/QC department has listed on Non Conformance Reports.  At this
juncture, no money can be withheld from SSEP. To ensure they will be fixed,
Title should transfer after our QA/QC inspectors give written notice that
each Unit is complete and ready to ship.  This will protect ENA on the
quality of the machines, as well as, ensure that little or no "re-work" is
performed in the field.

If you require further information or any assistance in this matter, please
feel free to contact me at 713-646-8258.

Matthew Tezyk
Project Manager


Happy New Year Gang!

Here is a draft for the '02 on call schedule.  Please take a look at it and let me know if there are any conflicts with the assigned weekends/holidays.  Merci.

Lorraine


Did you say you were missing a phone?  I may have an extra one for sale -
CHEAP TOO!  I made a bunch of 1-900 calls on it last night.  Newphew called
me at 12:00 ish and showed up around 12:45.  I'm tuckered.


I submitted the estimated headcount worksheets today based on the assumptions from the following worksheet.  The worksheet reflects the cost center that each employee is identified under in the HR system.  Please review this information and start to think about how employees need to be realigned in 2002 to accurately reflect what company they should roll-up to.  We will need to identify this information soon for budget purposes.  For individuals that provide services for more than one company I will need a % breakout for each company.  If you have any questions, please advise.
Donna


Here is the Entergy presentation.  Thanks
Ben


Scott sent this to Marty, but I assume you already have had communications
with him about this.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 07:14 AM -----

	Marty Sunde@EES
	12/28/2000 07:05 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: What we would like Lay to get from Davis

In case you didn't see.
---------------------- Forwarded by Marty Sunde/HOU/EES on 12/28/2000 07:05
PM ---------------------------

Scott Stoness
12/27/2000 01:50 PM
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: What we would like Lay to get from Davis

Marty.  This is a summary of our message from this morning for you to send on
or discuss with Keene.  I hope this is helpful.  Scott

What's important
Give solvency to the utilities by guaranteeing no banckruptcy against the
generation assets of the utilities.  Guarantees to be recovered, if needed,
through surcharges over 10 years.  This should give the process time for
thoughtful solutions.  Ending the rate freeze now will give the utilities an
undeserved windfall (3.5b alone related to nuclear assets in year 2001).
There should be thoughtful process to determine: i) how to keep deregulation
going, ii) how existing generation assets should be used, iii) what are the
value of existing assets, iv) when is the appropriate time for customers to
be exposed to the market, and v) what kind of market structure would be
appropriate going forward.
Customers should not be dumped into the market, now or in the next year,
while it is extremely illiquid due to many errors of the utilities.
There should not be retroactive rate making (the negative ctc should be paid
until at least the rate freeze is ended)
All customers should be treated equally with respect to existing generation
assets that they paid for for the past 4-30 years.
There should be a special hearing called to debate demand side prospects (ie.
curtailment etc.)

From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 12/26/2000 07:01 PM
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

The Governor cancelled the meeting at the last minute.  Apparently, he was
trying to schedule a meeting with Clinton and our meeting conflicted, so we
were bumped.  We are trying to set a new time.  I will share with the
Governor's energy advisor the information and recommendations all of you
helped put together.  Thanks


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	meeting w/ cindy wisemiller at my desk

Date:		5/29/2001
Time:		9:30 AM - 10:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Greg (Adams),
Attached is our cash forecast.  There are several important points to keep in mind with this forecast:
1. This is our best guess at this point.  As other business units clarify their business plans, it will affect our activity. Once their plans are set and communicated to us, we can better forecast our numbers.
2. This forecast represents the estate only.  (Since that is what we discussed in the meeting on Monday)  We have made no attempt to forecast NETCo since that has already been done and is seperate.
3.Infrastructures numbers are somewhat soft due to the Outlook problems experienced yesterday.  As they firm up or we get additional information, we can update numbers.
4. We have not included any future severance or retainage payments as we discussed.
5. I have included a tab which attempts to segregate costs by business unit.  Again, this is soft and will be better defined as the business units define their plans.
6. I will be out of the office after today for a while.  If you have questions after today, contact Mike Galvan (x3-5439) or Kevin May (x5-2508)
7. I have not put this file on the O: drive since it is being emailed.  Let me know if I need to.

Kerry (x5-4895)


Max, I forgot all about you needing this.  I'm working on it now and I'll highlight the items as I do it in case it takes a couple of days.
This is what I have done so far.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doner, Max
Sent:	Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:04 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	FW: Pricing Adjustments in Sitara for November 2001

Chris,
Just following up on this item as I have tried to process these adjustments and
they have not been zeroed in Sitara yet.  If I need to send these to someone
else, just let me know.

Thanks,
Max

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doner, Max
Sent:	Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:16 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	Pricing Adjustments in Sitara for November 2001

Chris,

Here are the adjustments that need to be made in Sitara for November 2001

Please "Zero" out the Demand charges for the following deals :

118129
352617
40399
594833
1020672
109473
156869
207039
318420
40390
40401
40402
71744
40393
1146752
118380
156865
156875
231751
231752
253906
253946
318413
458679
550864
594832
64154
64155
64156
64158
64159
64161
64162
643880
643882
643885
86362
86373
40397
40403
40404
40405
40406
40407
40408
40409
40411
80041
318426
570534
534938
706526

I had Phillip Love enter these prior to the bankruptcy.  These are items we would have collected and then
repaid to other parties on behalf of the State of Florida.  Since we were unable to do that, these charges need
to be removed.  If you have any other questions, please call me.

Thanks,
Max

P.S.  I will be sending your pricing adjustments for December 2001 soon.


I've included a total return to shareholder slide at the beginning the
presentation.  Comparing Enron to the S&P 500, it shows returns for one, five
and 10 years (taken from the Investor Conference slides).  The one below
covers a broader comparison, which helps to make our case, right?

Margaret Carson
02/15/2001 10:17 AM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: ENE RETURN TO SHAREHOLDERS

Mary  Hope  this  is helpful..    regards   Margaret


Ken -- Continental Airlines magazine is doing a cover story on you for their
April issue.  The interview is scheduled for Nov. 30.   I've scheduled a
photo shoot for you on Dec. 8 in the office, but since they'll need several
photos for the article, the photographer has asked if you're willing to have
your photo taken in your home, as well.   If not, do you have any suggestions
for alternate locations?  They're looking for a natural, comfortable setting.

Please let me know.  Thank you.
Karen


Is it possible to get a login ID and password to get into the CERA site?

Best,
Jeff

	Lora Sullivan
	03/20/2001 07:46 AM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: California in the Dark - CERA Alert

Title: California in the Dark
URL: http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2302

In a recent Washington Post op-ed piece, Dan Yergin and Larry Makovich
discuss the continued mess of California's electric power problems. Rather
than fixing the flaws, the current policies from Sacramento are moving
California down the road to an expensive public power setup and higher prices
for consumers and businesses. And the shortage is going to get worse this
summer.

**end**

Follow above URL for full report.

E-mail Category: Alert
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Global Energy,


I am trying to pull together a report on the future of the gas market in
Texas.  I was wondering if you have a report that shows new generation coming
on in the next 3-4 years as well as a report that shows current generation.
The names of the companies building/owning the facilities is not important.
The most important data is MW capacity as well as type of generation (i.e.,
natural gas, coal, etc.)

Do you have this information?

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

Natural
  Herbal Alternative to Viagra!

  SWEAT
  SENSATIONS FOR MEN & WOMEN !

  The BEST SELLING 100% ALL NATURAL APHRODISIAC IN AMERICA!

Click
  Here to Enhance Your Sex Life!

Increase
  Sexual Performance!

  Same Amazing Results without the negative side effects!

  Formulas for Men and Women!

For
  Women
  -Intensify your Pleasure, Highten your Sensitivity

  Experience Multiple Orgasms!

For
  Men - You'll perform
  like you're 19 again!

Click
  Here for More Info!

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

We strongly oppose the use of SPAM email and do not want to send our mailings
  to anyone who does not wish to receive them. As a result, we have retained the
  services of an independent 3rd party to administer our list management and remove
  list This is not SPAM. If you do not wish to receive further mailings, please
  click below and enter your email at the bottom of the page. You can then rest-assured
  that you will never receive another email from us again. http://www.removeyou.com


Western executed 10,000 MMBtu/d of Blanco to Thoreau capacity effective June 2002, as an additional source of supply for their Red Rock expansion contract.  The capacity is for 15 years at the maximum rate, generating $5.6 million in demand charges.
Sold two packages of stranded firm transportation to Burlington Resources from LaMaquina to Blanco for November and December at $0.05 plus fuel, which gives TW an incremental revenues of $45,500 not already in plan.  These transactions were executed through EnronOnLine.

Michelle Lokay
Account Director
Transwestern Commercial Group
713-345-7932


We would propose the following document for proprietary information.  If you
have any comments, please contact
Ken Wong at Kenneth.Wong@gm.com or 313 974-1348. I will only be available by
email until Thursday morning.

Thanks
Richard Dix

(See attached file: Proprietary Info-enron.doc)

 - Proprietary Info-enron.doc


471898

this deal is under prebon, should it be apb or does a separate deal need to
be entered?

thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000 09:42
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mark Taylor                           01/17/2000 11:19 AM

To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: On-line GTC's for Enron Clean Fuels Company (ECFC)

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000 11:18
AM ---------------------------

Nony Flores
01/14/2000 06:34 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven M
Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: On-line GTC's for Enron Clean Fuels Company (ECFC)

Mark -

Mike Robison and I have finalized the form of GTC's for ECFC and are
forwarding them to you for further distribution.  Thanks.

John -

The only modifications to ECFC's online GTC's are as follows:

Contract Formation In order to maintain consistency with the other product
lines online GTCs, we've modified this section to reflect the same
introduction as reflected in ELFI, EGLI, ERAC and EPC.

Damages and Limitation We've added a 2 line bilateral provision regarding
payment.

Financial Information We've added the two paragraphs re credit provisions as
reflected in the confirmations.

Compliance with U.S. Laws We've added the buyer/seller trade sanctions as
reflected in the confirmations.

Law and Jurisdiction We replaced this section in its entirety with the new
policy in effect as of June 1998.

Appendix II We've added the Marine Provisions Addendum.

Appendix III We've added the Transportation Addendum.

Thanks.
Nony Flores
Ext. 37541

Dale Neuner on 01/12/2000 05:24:45 PM
To: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dforster@enron.com, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT, Steven M Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

Mark -

Although these products were not on the release list for the Jan 5 release,
we have been actively pursuing their completion and posting to EOL. Since our
reviews of the products are complete, the Petrochems guys are extremely eager
to have their products posted. Please offer your approval of the attached
ASAP so I can get this and the product onto EOL.

Nony -

We were expecting delivery of the Methanol GTC today. Please be aware that
the uploading of GTC's can sometimes be laborious, and since the Petrochem
guys are eager to get this out, time is of the essence. Please let me know
when you can expect delivery of the Methanol GTC to Mark Taylor.

Dale

Nony Flores
01/11/2000 06:09 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven M Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

Mark -

Last week Dale Neuner was requested to add four new commodities to on-line
trading and Mike Robison and Steve Elliott have reviewed and approved the
long descriptions for benzene, mixed xylene, toluene and methanol.   We have
also finalized the form of GTC's for EPC (who trades benzene, xylene and
toluene) and are forwarding them to you for further distribution.

Note:  GTC's for Enron Clean Fuels Company (who trades methanol) will follow
on Wednesday.

Thanks.
Nony Flores
Ext. 3-7541


Wes

Here is current draft of CDWR agreement.  Negotiations are still underway.
The underlying contract is the EEI Master - let me know if you need that
standard form.
Call w/ any questions/comments

Elizabeth
36349
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 04:32 PM -----

	"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
	03/20/2001 10:18 AM

		 To: jpirog@water.ca.gov
		 cc: cyoder@ect.enron.com, Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com, "MICHAEL W E DIDRIKSEN"
<MDIDRIKSEN@LLGM.COM>
		 Subject: Revised Draft

John:  as per your request, attached are revised drafts of the Confirmation
and Cover Sheet, which are blacklined against the respective documents from
the short-term deal.  I recognize that you are still reviewing certain
questions/points with CDWR and there may be some items reflected in this
draft that neither you nor CDWR has "signed off" on.  Nonetheless, in certain
cases I thought it made sense to provide you with specific contract language
on some of the points we discussed so that you could clearly see what we may
be proposing on a particular item.

Please note, in particular, the following:

--on the LD calculation, we reverted to your proposed language on obtaining
multiple market quotes, etc.  However, after talking to Enron this evening,
we would like to propose that if quotes cannot be obtained despite the
parties' good faith efforts to do so, then only in that circumstance would
the calculation be based on the Non-Defaulting Party's losses.  While, based
on the product Enron is selling, we anticipate that quotes will be readily
obtainable, we think it makes sense to revert to the Non-Defaulting Party's
loss calculation in the highly unlikely event that quotes are not obtainable
despite using all efforts to do so.  I know that you expressed some
reservations the other evening that this process potentially could be subject
to some manipulation.  This is not so.  If CDWR was the Defaulting Party and
it disputes the loss calculation made by Enron, such dispute would become the
subject of arbitration.  In such case, the Non-Defaulting Party's would have
to furnish its historical and current power curves to prove its case.  Since
those same figures necessarily are needed by Enron to report its trading
positions on a day to day basis as part of its normal business operations and
such information feeds directly into its financial reporting statements and
other relevant financial information, etc. that becomes, in part, part of its
SEC filings, in a discovery proceeding this information would be very
transparent.

--with respect to the situs of any arbitration proceeding, Enron strongly
believes that it is only fair to both parties that this be conducted in a
neutral site.  The draft provides for New York City, although Enron is open
to other possible locations.

--the revised draft reflects only the $127/MWh alternative scenario since you
indicated that, preliminarily, you felt that CDWR would not be likely to
choose the alternative structure we had discussed.

--we would like to further discuss the effect of an adverse federal
regulatory change.  I'm sure you can appreciate this in light of the current
environment, although we would think that freely negotiated bilateral
contracts would not be subject to the types of changes being discussed.
Enron is not seeking a termination right with LDs, but would like to further
discuss a termination right without compensation in the event of a major
adverse federal development affecting the contract.

--we have dropped our request that Enron have the right to suspend
performance in the case of a Bond downgrade event.  However, we think it is
appropriate that if that circumstance occurs, that the due date for payments
by CDWR should shorten to 7 days and if the Bonds are subsequently upgraded
that the payment schedule would revert accordingly.

--you requested that we propose a limit on the right of a Non-Defaulting
Party to suspend its performance in the case of a Default by the Defaulting
Party.  We included a 60-NERC day limit on such right in the revised draft.
This is important to Enron as we discussed, particularly in light of Enron's
acceptance of the 180 day period on the timing of a Termination Payment
which, as you know, is unheard of in the power sale (or virtually any other)
arena.  (Nonetheless, we fully understand the position enunciated by the bond
people on this point).

--on assignment, the Enron commercial people cannot agree to a pre-approved
right of CDWR to assign the contract to the IOUs.  As we discussed, it may
very well be the case that at the time any assignment were to be effected
that Enron may already be at the limit of its overall exposure with those
counter parties.  It can't be in a position where such an assignment could
cause it to violate those limits.

--we included an outside date by which Enron must decide whether or not to go
forward of the first to occur of (1) September 30, 2001 or (2) seven days
after the Bonds are issued.  You had indicated that CDWR might be willing to
consider such an "outside date" as long as (i) the $127/MWh pricing was in
effect from April 1 and (2) Enron had to act very shortly after the Bonds are
issued.  We have proposed 7 days for this.

--in concept, we probably will be ok with the alternative of securing a
credit rating for the Fund (as opposed to the Bonds), although we have
referred that question to the credit people to make sure.

--in light of your response about opinions not being provided by outside
counsel, we modified the confirmation to request that the opinions could be
from the AG, or if CDWR cannot do that, then from the GC of CDWR.  We felt
that this would not involve additional work since these presumably will be
rendered in connection with the Bonds and we provided that they generally
would be provided to us after the Bonds are issued.

I think the foregoing represent most of the items we had discussed.  Please
let me know when you wish to discuss.  Also, it may make sense for our next
call to have the respective Enron and CDWR commercial folks on the call since
it may be the case that many of the final decisions involved may be
commercial ones.

Lastly, please note that while we have discussed most of the points addressed
in the revised drafts with Enron, in order to expedite the process, we are
sending these drafts simultaneously to you and Enron.  Thus, it is possible
that Enron may have further modifications or changes to the documents.

Thanks.  We look forward to working with you to finalize the requisite
documents.

John

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com
 - CDWRConf.doc
 - CDWRMaster.doc
 - Conf-bl.doc.rtf
 - Master-bl.doc.rtf


Any recommendations to correct this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 10:16 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Reliant Issue with EOL Notices

Kevin -

Just got off the phone with Jackie Thomas at Relaint.  I worked with Jackie many years ago and I think he runs their power trading desk.  Anyway, he said he has had heartburn with the way EOL notifies users of contract/confirm changes.  EOL puts up a banner notifying the user of the change but he claims that if the user does not log on for several days then the banner may not appear, yet the contract change has been implemented.  Jackie cited the specific instance of the ERCOT 138 kv delivery requirement as an example of a change that apparently "slipped by".  Jackie feels that either the banner should stay active on a user by user basis until that user logs in and acknowledges it or a notice should be sent to a legal contact at the company - preferably both.  He does not feel as though our legal group appreciates his concern and their legal group is recommending that they halt trading on EOL unless some safeguards are implemented - he does not want to do this.

I am not sure if the situation he described is accurate, but I did want this info to be conveyed and I think someone from EOL should call him to discuss.  Jackie's number is 713-2071308.  I would be glad to continue to facilitate discussions if necessary.

Thanks,
Rogers


Enron is willing to perform the operation under question (1) but not (2) and (3) as we have no control over these processes and only have control over process (1).
The System Controller can contact Enron Canada Power Corp at the number in your files.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richey, Cooper
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 8:30 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	FW: Supply Shortfall Procedures

in case you didn't get this

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ken.Gardner@powerpool.ab.ca@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:30 PM
To:	pat_cooper@transalta.com; mwindsor@enmax.com; mike.cooper@atcoelectric.com; kjdberg@epcor.ca; alr@city.red-deer.ab.ca; nigpim@city.medicine-hat.ab.ca; olenz@city.lethbridge.ab.ca; david.carmichael@atcopower.com; john.ell@atcopower.com; gord.mcphee@atcopower.com; alhoffort@epcor.ca; adele_birchill@transalta.com; bhan@epcor.ca; martin.merrit@engageenergy.com; wayne_occonnor@transcanada.com; Richey, Cooper; joeg@encoreenergy.com; wickhamc@novachem.com; pgschubert@dow.com; dmitchell@suncor.com; anderson.murray@syncrude.com; Marie_Gallant@PanCanadianEnergy.com; doug.heath@balancingpool.ca; lloyd_bures@transalta.com; dave_currie@transalta.com; royhanson@epcor.ca; chrisc@cnrl.com; denis.martin@airliquide.com; c.morgan@epcor.ca; brian_novak@transalta.com; joe.goebel@ualberta.ca
Cc:	Doug.Hincks@powerpool.ab.ca; jim_paton@transalta.com
Subject:	Supply Shortfall Procedures

As I have discussed with many of you, we are revising the Power Pool Supply
Shortfall Procedures (POP 801) in accordance with Transmission Operating
Policy OP-107.  POP 801 contains several steps from the time all the energy
in the energy market merit order has been dispatched up, to the time when a
firm load directive will be issued by the System Controller to curtail firm
load. In order to gather the information required to develop the procedure,
would you please answer the following questions.  Any action you choose to
take is on a voluntary and best effort basis, without any obligation on your
behalf.

In an effort to reduce the amount of, or possibility of having to issue, a
firm load directive to curtail load, would you please reply whether you will
comply with any of the following requests from the System Controller prior
to the issuing of a firm load directive to curtail load.  Please reply not
applicable (N/A) to the questions that do not apply to you.  If you will
comply to any of these requests, we will include the request(s) in the steps
identified in POP 801.  Also, if you will comply to any of these requests,
please indicate the appropriate party for the System Controller to contact.
If you choose not to comply with any of these requests please reply that you
will not.  This will let us know not to make a request for something that
will not be provided, which otherwise could cause confusion and waste
valuable time during the management of this type of an event.

1. Would you provide available generation energy that was not offered into
the energy market merit order if requested to do so by the System Controller
prior to a firm load directive to curtail load?

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

2. Would you reduce non-essential station service loads at your plant(s) if
requested to do so by the System Controller prior to a firm load directive
to curtail load?

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

3. Would you reduce non-essential drag line loads (if applicable) if
requested to do so by the System Controller prior to a firm load directive
to curtail load?

Location:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Location:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

4. Would you provide a 3% (or another value) reduction in distribution
voltage if requested to do so by the System Controller prior to a firm load
directive to curtail load?

Name of Wire Service Provider:

If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Please email or fax your response to me by December 12.  If you have any
questions please contact me. Your reply (either way) is appreciated.

Thank you,
Ken Gardner
Pool Code Analyst
Power Pool of Alberta
Phone: (403) 233-6416
Fax: (403) 543-0388


Stan:  I understand completely, and we will do our very best to achieve your
desired approach.  The problem is this: Regardless of what the MOU says,  we
will have to go through a size/probability analysis on this deal.  The deal
is clearly material to EOTT.  From an SEC perspective, the duty to disclose a
pending deal depends upon how material the transaction is and how likely it
is to occur.  If a deal is very material, a lower degree of probability is
needed before disclosure is required.  The MOU itself is not totally
determinative, although signing a document which looks like an LOI will
increase the chances of having to disclose.  In the present case, if
Equilon's Board gives the go- ahead to deal with us exclusively, I feel there
would be at least a 20% chance of closing a transaction (based upon past
dealings with these folks). Accordingly, if/when that happens, we will need
to take a hard look at the disclosure issue.  We do not want to disclose
prematurely, but I am pretty sure that this deal would be considered
"material," and if we go forward with Equilon, I believe that we will need to
disclose it at some point prior to closing (certainly after signing a PSA).
We can delay disclosure for a period of time for legitimate business reasons,
and the MOU we sign may not rise to the level of an LOI, but at some
point---if we go forward with Equilon---we are going to reach a point where
the size and probability of the deal will mandate disclosure.  We don't need
to make a decision at this point, we just need to be aware of these
circumstances and manage the process accordingly.

From a different perspective, we want to sign some kind of LOI with Equilon
as soon as we feel comfortable doing so because we want the HSR waiting
period to begin running.  Equilon wants to close by November 1st.

Please advise if you wish to discuss further.  Thanks.  SWD

	Stanley Horton@ENRON
	Sent by: Cindy Stark@ENRON
	07/12/2000 02:04 PM

		 To: Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@EOTT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Phoenix/Equilon Deal; CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY/CLIENT
COMMUNICATION AND ATTORNEY'S WORK PRODUCT

Steve:

Let's start thinking about how we could structure the MOU so we wouldn't have
to disclose the deal.  I would rather not disclose a "tentative deal".

Stan

From: Steve Duffy@EOTT on 07/11/2000 01:47 PM
To: Dana Gibbs, Lori Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Richards, rbaird@velaw.com, Susan Ralph

Subject: Phoenix/Equilon Deal; CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY/CLIENT COMMUNICATION AND
ATTORNEY'S WORK PRODUCT

Joe R. will be sending out something in greater detail shortly, but it
appears that Equilon's management would like to pursue a deal with us on an
exclusive basis and that this decision is being forwarded to the Equilon
Board for approval.  If this acquisition goes forward, we will need to get
organized---in the near term---on a number of logistical/due diligence tasks,
but one thing we should start thinking about now is the "disclosure" issue.

If the Equilon Board gives the go-ahead for Equilon to pursue this
transaction , Equilon will probably want  to sign a memorandum of
understanding with us, and this may put us in a "disclosure" posture because
at that point, we would be looking at a $65 million deal (approx.) with a
closure probability of no less than 20% (in my judgment, based upon our past
dealings with these people).  Even without a signed document, the
"size/probability" test would still be an issue for us to deal with.
Everyone should be thinking about this issue as we await word from Equilon's
Board. Thanks.   SWD


if you get a chance to read, this is a great article

Sheri
----- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 02:54 PM -----

	Kal Shah
	04/09/2001 12:00 PM

		 To: Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT, Michael Bridges/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Goddard/EU/Enron@Enron, Jay Webb/HOU/ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Forrester Research -- "Net Energy Hits Hypergrowth"

Please go to:

http://www.forrester.com/Research/ThankYou/0,2252,11379,00.html

and download a free copy of a 20 page Forrester Research report about the
future of online wholesale energy trade.  All major industry players and
consultants including EnronOnline were interviewed for this report.

Kal Shah

---------------------- Forwarded by Kal Shah/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 12:49 PM
---------------------------

Peter Martin<pmartin@forrester.com> on 04/09/2001 11:20:00 AM
To: <kal.shah@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Your copy of "Net Energy Hits Hypergrowth"

Thank you for taking the time to speak with us for our April 2001 Net Energy
Hits Hypergrowth Report. Your insights and views were extremely helpful in
shaping the analysis of the Report. The link at the bottom of this email will
bring you to our Web site, where you can download your complimentary copy of
the Report. I hope you will find it helpful, and if you have any questions or
comments please feel free to contact me. Once again, thank you for your time.

Regards,
Peter Martin
Forrester Research
pmartin@forrester.com

http://www.forrester.com/Research/ThankYou/0,2252,11379,00.html

For technical problems, please contact the Forrester Customer Center by
telephone at +1 888/265-7145 (toll-free in the United States and Canada only)
or +1 617/613-5730, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m.-7 p.m. EST.


Where is my new Oglethorpe sheet?


Reply Message:
Reply from 9069761 is don't know ---kean to Text message

Original Message:
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com||When back?
--------------------------
Rick S.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


After having conducted our first of several business reviews, Enron Global
Markets - Office of the Chairman would like to outline the following
organizational changes effective immediately.

The Global Risk Markets group under Jere Overdyke illustrates enormous
opportunities given the size of those businesses.  To better focus on the
different commercial functions and to capture market share and value, the
group is being realigned.  Jere will continue to manage Global Risk Markets
and build on our insurance capabilities.  Mark Tawney is responsible for our
weather business and will now report to the EGM Office of the Chairman.

Brent Price will be joining Enron Global Markets as Vice President of
Operations and Chief Accounting Officer.  He will report to the EGM Office of
the Chairman, and to Sally Beck, Vice President of Global Risk Management
Operations.  In his role as Chief Accounting Officer, Brent will also report
to Rick Causey, Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer for
Enron Corp.  Reporting to Brent in his new position will be Sheila Glover,
business controller for Financial Products; Todd Hall, business controller
for weather; and Scott Earnest, business controller for global products and
coal.  In addition, Tom Myers will join Brent's management team as Director
of Accounting.  Brent and his team are responsible for all accounting, risk
reporting and trading operations for all the businesses within EGM.

Cindy Skinner will join the Enron Global Markets team with responsibility for
Human Resources.  She will also report to David Oxley and the HR organization.

Please join us in congratulating everyone in their assignments.


Following up on our discussions at the September 17 Board meeting, Wednesday we communicated our earnings expectations for the 3rd & 4th Quarters, 2001, 2002, and 2003 to investment analysts.  This communication was as we discussed at the Board meeting, but in addition we chose to communicate the special charges that we will be incurring in the 3rd & 4th Quarters.  Since it was relatively close to our earnings announcement [planned for October 18], we decided that it would be best to disclose the special charges now rather than waiting.
Attached is an updated summary of the special charges.  They have changed somewhat since the Board as we raised  the total charge for the third quarter by $.04 per share to $.14.   Specifically, in the Restructuring and Asset Impairment category the charge increased by $.03 primarily due to the required write off of  manufacturing facilities in Brazil.  We also added $.01 related to Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt as our open market repurchase activity resulted in the acquisition of a higher mix of longer-term issues, thus increasing the cost somewhat.
The reaction by analysts to these charges is that they are truly one time items.  Therefore, they will be normalized out and analysts will view the 3rd Quarter results as being $.66 per share.
Even though we lowered expectations for the fourth quarter and 2002, overall the communication was accepted positively. In particular, investors appreciated our willingness and need to spend more in 2002 to maximize the sales of the five new products we expect to launch in 2001 and 2002. We closed Thursday at just under $79, down about $3.75 from our close on Tuesday. This was a much better result than we anticipated.
If you have any questions about this, please let me know.
Charlie
10/4/2001

 - Q3 & 2001 Yr Normalized Items.doc


This is a comparison to their version.  I think I have a comparison to ours
as well.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/21/2000 04:02
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           09/21/2000 01:56 PM

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: VEPCO


Premise: FERC should investigate the utility decisionmaking that led the
Califonia market to the point of excess gas demand, rather than rush to
impose gas price caps.

Utilities had ample opportunity to fill up storage last summer, but most
likely choose not to for price reasons.

Transwestern had at least a 100 M/D of available capacity to Califonia and to
the SoCal Needles delivery point through July 2000.

 Avg. Scheduled (compared to 1.1 Bcf/D capacity): April  780
        May  820
        Jun-Jul  980
        Aug  1050
        Oct-Dec 1080 (essentially full)

During the period April-Jul, TW was able to deliver up to the full 750 M/D at
Needles, but on many days SoCal gas instituted "windowing," lowering the
ability to take at Needles to 680-720 M/D.  SoCal's argument was that they
didn't believe that there was sufficient demand to run at the 750 M/D level
(even when TW had nominations of 750 M/D).

El Paso was also not full to Califonia until the last month.   At all times
El Paso  had available capacity at PG&E delivery points.  During the pipeline
outage El Paso was limited in their ability to fully deliver to the North
SoCal delivery point.  However, they were not full for deliveries to SoCal at
the south system delivery point.

2.    Utilities have opposed pipeline expansions to California

Sempra protested Transwestern's 140 M/D Gallup expansion, arguing that there
is no need for new capacity (CP99-522).

Sempra has also protested Questar's application to convert an oil line to new
gas pipeline service to California (S. Trails Expansion).


Looks like I need to cancel.  My wife reminded me that I promised to take my daughter to lunch on Saturday. She hasn't been home in a month and I would like to see her.   Can you play on Sunday morning?  If so I will try and get a t time.  Let me know.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	TGBOLDIG@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 1:17 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Subject:	RE: Golf Sat

No Problem.  Give me a call on my cell if you can't make it 281-798-7317.

Tom


<TITLE>$20 Promo</TITLE>

-- You signed up to receive special offers at Colonize.com --

Congratulations Joseph!

Get a FREE $20 check*!

Claim right now

Claim right now

*Get a FREE $20 CHECK when you sign up for Sprint Nickel Nights(sm) for your
state-to-state long distance and stay a customer for 90 days. Not available for current
Sprint customers. Click for more details.

      Questions? Comments? Email us at: info@colonize.com

You are currently subscribed as: joe.stepenovitch@enron.com

To unsubscribe visit:

http://www.colonize.com/u.php3?e=joe.stepenovitch@enron.com


Monika, fyi---Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allan, David
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Murray, Julia
Subject:	ooops

Julia, please ignore the previous version---I neglected to delete Jacobs-Sirrine's consent form from the end of the
Word doc. My proposed Service Order plus supporting spreadsheet are attached.

Sorry,

Dave


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]     Search  Amazon.com for:

 We  hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather  not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please  visit the Help page  Updating  Subscriptions and Communication Preferences  and click the Customer  Communication Preferences link.   Please  note that this e-mail was sent to the following address:  jarnold@ect.enron.com

[IMAGE]