It wasn't just me changing plans.  All I ask is that sometime over the
weekend we see Finding Forrester.  And of course get my car aligned Sat. and
a tuneup Monday.  Now that I'm thinking about it I'm going to be spending a
lot of money this weekend on things that aren't exactly fun.  Oh well.

I'm planning to get out of here around 4:30ish if nothing goes wrong.  So
just call me at home when you get home.  Oh, yeah....Chipper means happy, or
in a good mood, kind of in a bouncy mood.

Talk to ya later,
Robin


Mr. Bayne:

Attached is the updated document.  If you need anything else, please let
me know.


I have placed the new version of the model on O:\_Dropbox\modelgriffith3.xls

The second function works off the "Skew4" tab, and the name of the function
is "calcskew2"
The inputs to the calcskew2 function are the same, except for "a" and "b",
which are now
"anew" and "bnew".

Regards,

Hector


Scott,
Call Bob Lewis @ Equitable Energy, LLC @ 412-395-2615.  He will give you a
bid for the capacity (assumming we want to get rid of it).
John


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Lynn-OUT OF OFFICE

Date:		3/7/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


I have prepared a form of transmittal memo for sending the original
guarantees down to Credit.  I though you might want to use it as a template.


Attached is the FINAL Name Change/Merger report for March 2001.  Please note
that the most recent overlays are on top because unlike the others, prior
notification has not been given.  These were just done last night and this
morning.  For the complete report, go to the bottom tab, "March 2001".

The shortname changes will be coordinated with ERMS IT today, Fri, 03/23/01.

Records will be inactivated on Mon, April 2, 2001.

FYI - On the Feb 2001 report, there were several PG&E entities that went
through name changes to El Paso entities.  There were also 3 TECO
conversions.  We did not have the documentation to support those changes, as
noted on the report.  As of 03/22/01, all documentation for those changes are
in hand.

Regarding the Coastal/El Paso merger, the documents that support name changes
as a result of that merger, have been received.  If you are interested in
more details regarding the remaining entities, they are attached below.

We have made a few changes to our Name Change/Merger Notification Report - it
now has a new look and a couple of features we hope will assist you.  For
more information, please click below:

Each month now has two sheets, a summary sheet (eg Jan 01 Changes) and a
detailed sheet (eg Jan 01).
Click below for more information:

The summary sheet can be used to view all changes after a certain date.  If
you're aware of all changes up to, say, January 15th enter 01/16/2001 in cell
C6 of the Summary Sheet and click the Sort button in cell H6.  All changes
made to the report on or after January 16th will be listed automatically.
The Summary sheet may also be sorted for certain criteria - use the drop down
arrows alongside the column headers to make your selection.

This sheet contains all the information you are used to seeing, but slightly
reformatted.  Key points are:
In the case of an Inactivation, the cause of the Inactivation (eg Merger) is
listed in the Comments section
As with the previous format,
all months' reports will be sent cumulatively throughout the year
the report will be sent out twice each month, on the 15th and at the end of
the month.

It is our aim to publish the report in Livelink and to send out only the
summary sheet and a URL for the detailed report each month.  This will save a
lot of space in Lotus Notes and we hope it will streamline your monitoring
process.

We'd be very happy to receive any comments you may have.

Please call if there are questions or concerns.

Cheryl x33103


Jeff, possible buyer. What are we doing with the NEPool Book - are we selling?

Regards
Delainey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allen, Mark
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 7:12 AM
To:	Delainey, David W.
Subject:	FW: British Petroleum Inquiry about EES Via Frevert
Importance:	High

I appologize, must have missed the "i" when I typed your name yesterday, as a P.S. to this note, Tony has been cleared by Lord John Brown to have these discussions

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allen, Mark
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:13 PM
To:	Delaney, David
Cc:	Mann, Michael; Moore, Michael; Blachman, Jeremy
Subject:	British Petroleum Inquiry about EES Via Frevert
Importance:	High

David,
Per my phone message, I have been informed through my friend at British Petroleum (Andrew Netemeyer, VP Electric Trading) that there has been an inquiry to Mr Frevert via voice mail by Mr. Tony Fountain (President, BP Energy) about wholesale issues and retail interests of Enron.  They appear to have some issues on the wholesale side to discuss but have significant interest in the retail books of business with EES and wish to discuss these with you asap..Andrew Netemeyer would bring a Mr. Bill Burton in their M&A department into the loop and I beleive they have already had some individuals assigned to due some due diligence if Enron will entertain the interest.  Mr Netemeyer's number is (281) 366-4998, and any assistance I can provide regarding introductions or relationship let me know, they have been considering the expansion of retail gas & power and the timing may be right...
Regards,
MVA


Rebecca,

TXU is correct on the pricing.  I have adjusted the deal tickets in Sitara.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffin, Rebecca
Sent:	Tuesday, April 17, 2001 1:37 PM
To:	Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	TXU Gas Distribution deal #589007

Could you verify the pricing on TXU Gas Distribution deal #589007 for the following days?

Sitara shows:
2/6 - 2/6		5,000 mmbtu @ 6.62
2/10 - 2/12	30,000 mmbtu @ KATY.HUB.GDP.D.A
		40,000 mmbtu @ WAHA.HUB.GDP.D.A

TXU Gas paid based on:
2/6 - 2/6		5,000 mmbtu @ 5.62
2/10 - 2/12	40,000 mmbtu @ KATY.HUB.GDP.D.A
		50,000 mmbtu @ WAHA.HUB.GDP.D.A

Thanks for your help.  Let me know if this should go to someone else.

Rebecca


Here are my responses:

1. Development fee is a commercial question.  This will need to be vetted
with Herman if we go with it.  Personally, I'd skip it and push to sign next
week.

2.  I have a call in to Dale.

3.  No LLC.  Kathleen will handle.  The closer the creation is to the signing
of the letter, the better, taking into account the time required to get the
docs back and set up.  Someone needs to name it.  We should also look at a
minimal list of officers.

4.  I don't have the attachment in front of me, so I will have to look it
up.  I'll get back to you.  The concept is that ENA is only responsible for
changes in the amounts owed to GE as of the closing date.  I thought the
language was awkward, and tried to make it more clear, but obviously failed!
As soon as I get the break out contract from Dale we can check on the
definitional questions. It SHOULD be the same as in the CA breakout contract
with GE, but I won't make that assumption.  Drop dead date on put/call Dec.
2002.

5. This needs to be discussed with Ben.

6.  This should be set up as a  new matter, since these aren't the Blue Dog
turbines. You can send the bill to Sheila with a copy to me.

I'll open the doc and take a look at it asap.

Kay

From: Carlos Sole on 03/05/2001 05:59 PM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com, kay.mann@enron.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com
cc:

Subject: Issues List for LLC Documents with Panda Energy and Delta

Apologies to Carolyn for the repeated misspellings below.

----- Forwarded by Carlos Sole/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 05:59 PM -----

	Carlos Sole
	03/05/2001 05:55 PM

		 To: kay.mann@enron.com
		 cc: ccampbell@kslaw.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com
		 Subject: Issues List for LLC Documents with Panda Energy and Delta

Kay, as I told you, Carolyn put out a set of intial draft documents and we
debriefed Jake and Stephen.  Based on our meeting, Carolyn was going to make
certain revisions based on the answers to the questions below and certain
other items we raised during our meeting.  Nevertheless, your input is
required on the following:

1.  We have discussed eliminating the payment of a development fee, which if
Delta /  Panda were to breach its obligations prior to the funding of the
Escrow would be non-refundable and serve as a form of liquidated damages.
Commercially the inclination is to avoid that fee, we need to confirm that
approach.

2.  We need to interface with Dale Rasmussen on the status of the break out
contract and how quickly it can be incorporated into the form of Facility
Agreement that would be part of our transaction.

3.  Have we established an LLC that will be sold for this project.

4.  Please see Caroline's questions 6, 7 and 13 below.

5.  Please see faxes that I left on your chair on the broker issue and
whether we need to respond in writing.  Sheila Tweed's position was not to.

6.  John asked whether K&S should open a separate subfile or include the time
charged within the Blue Dog file?

Thanks and we'll talk tomorrow.

----- Forwarded by Carlos Sole/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 05:46 PM -----

	Jake Thomas@ECT
	03/05/2001 02:34 PM

		 To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Initial Draft of LLC Documents with Panda Energy

See Comments in Red Below

Stephen Thome
03/05/2001 12:23 PM
To: Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Initial Draft of LLC Documents with Panda Energy

Jake,

Do you want to make suggestions with regard to #3, #7, #13

Please advise of the following additional information in order that we may
complete
the enclosed documents:

1.  Full name of Panda Energy; Panda Energy International, Inc. Don't we have
two sets of doc's going out ?  The other would be for Delta Power Company LLC
2.  Type of entity of Panda Energy (this affects the representations in
Section 3.2.1 et seq. of the LLC Agreement);  Privately held company
3.  Name of the new LLC formed by ENA;  Salmon Street Energy? Spawn Energy
LLC ? (I'm totally indifferent
4.  Date of organization of the new LLC;
5.  Purchase Price payable by Panda;  $65,800,000.00 ($68,000,000.00) What
would ENA's 20% interest be valued at?
6.  Section 5(a) - there is a substantive question as to what ENA is
responsible for in connection with the Turbine Contract (I included in
brackets the alternative that was originally in the prototype document and
also the alternative as modified by Kay Mann);
7.  Outside date after which either party could terminate if transaction is
not closed;  7 April 2001?
8.   Date of confidentiality agreement;
9.  Identity of any broker used by Panda or ENA; Tom Young (I don't know if
he represents a brokerage firm).NOT!!!10.  Address for notice to Panda;

4100 Spring Valley, Suite 1001
Dallas, Texas 75244

11.  Confirmation that Purchase Amount is defined in the Turbine Contract;
12.  Confirmation that Commercial Operation is defined in the Turbine
Contract; and
13.  Date of automatic right to put or call the LLC interest.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
09:34 AM ---------------------------

Vasant Shanbhogue <vshanbh@yahoo.com> on 11/29/2000 09:49:16 PM
To: massong@epenergy.com, vkamins@enron.com, sgibner@enron.com,
pkrishn@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Reminder for dinner on Saturday Dec 2nd

This is to remind all of you of the dinner plan (with
family) at my house on Saturday Dec 2nd.  We will
expect you at about 6:00 pm.

Address:  3410 S. Briarpark Ln, Sugar Land

Directions (from downtown) :

Take 59 South all the way past Sam Houston Beltway 8,
and past Highway 6.  Take the next exit --- First
Colony Blvd/Sweetwater Blvd.  Take a left at the
traffic light onto Sweetwater Blvd (over the highway).
 Go straight on Sweetwater Blvd past a few traffic
lights and a few stop signs.  After passing a golf
course on the right, you will get a subdivision
"Crescents on the Green" on the right, and a
subdivision "BriarWood" on the left.  Take a Left into
the Briarwood subdivision and an immediate right onto
S. Briarpark Ln. (There is only one street in the
subdivision).  Our house (3410)is right there --- 3rd
house from cul-de-sec.
Phone : 281 265 8959
Cell : 713 569 2438

Vasant

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


of course...

just kidding.  Aldo's next week. you're done.  Open up your checkbook baby.

From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 10/13/2000 03:45 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Last night

am i being ignored?


Nice to meet you this morning.

Attached is a file containing the hardcopy data that John Griffith, Eric Boyt
and I provided.  The gas trader expects the transaction to close today--we'll
keep you posted.

In this transaction we owe gas to National Steel at far below current
market.  When we unwind you will be long these dollars.

Louis
x-54666


Phillip:  I agree with your conclusions, and we have already started
addressing most of these issues.

First of all, I would like to say that all of the schedulers are performing
at a high level, except for Hillary and Jan.  We have formally addressed
Hillary's performance problems, and he is on  a schedule for improvement or
he is out.  We have informally addressed Jan's performance issues with her,
and next week intend to formalize that also.  That Jan makes more than anyone
else in the group makes her situation quite critical in my eyes, because we
are not getting a return on that investment.

The rest of the group is paid based on lots of factors that you are already
aware of, years of service, years in scheduling, level of performance, etc.
In Stacey's particular case, I am recommending her for promotion at the end
of the year, which will bump her pay scale up and make her pay more equitable
with her job performance.  Also, I intend to help smooth over other
inequities through the bonus pool.

In regards to Patti, I have recommended her for a bonus for her service
during the rough time we've had when we were understaffed.  Bob Superty has
supported this, and the information you provided him this last week should
help in that endeavour.  Patti has had her pay increased this year after a
salary survey was performed by our HR group.  I would like to point out that
Patti is pretty well paid for someone with her experience level.  Also, Patti
would move up in the pay scale if she is promoted to Manager.  I am not sure
what the exact plan is for Patti and myself as far as how that will go.  I
would like to say that I feel more comfortable being back as each day goes
on, and am ready to make a move to trading anytime now if that is what you
and Mike still want to do.

As regards to the new hires:  yes, we can hire more like these at these
prices.  We would love to have employees like Matt, and Ted and Shelly,
especially at these prices.  Patti did an excellent job hiring these
individuals.  We have already started the process of looking for more like
these to start backfilling in for Hillary and Jan.  We also need to hire more
for establishing a bigger physical presence in the west.  We probably need to
sit down and go over with you and Mike as to what kind of plans you have for
expanding the desk.

Finally, I would like to bring up that Lucci has requested that the Denver
office do all nominations for IM Denver deals.  This has met stiff resistance
in the past, and I do not know how ya'll feel about it, but I promised that I
would bring it up. I personally feel that Denver and CIG would be isolated
from us if the operations were to move to Denver.

If you have additional questions or comments please let me know.  Thanks.


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 08/18/2000 11:01
AM ---------------------------

Susan M Landwehr
08/17/2000 11:36 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: O'Connor Op-Ed Piece - California

a little opinion piece from our friend at New Energy, Phil O'COnnor
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES on 08/17/2000
01:22 PM ---------------------------

"Fein, David I. - CHI" <david.fein@piperrudnick.com> on 08/17/2000 11:20:48 AM
To: "'Susan_M_Landwehr@enron.com'" <Susan_M_Landwehr@enron.com>,
"'rboston@enron.com'" <rboston@enron.com>
cc: "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>,
"Skey, Christopher N. - CHI" <christopher.skey@piperrudnick.com>, "Way, Karen
S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com>
Subject: O'Connor Op-Ed Piece - California

We thought that you would find the attached Op-Ed piece that appeared in the
Chicago Tribune today of interest.

PLEASE DON'T SHOOT THE MESSENGER
DEREGULATION NOT THE PROBLEM
By Philip R. O'Connor. Philip R. O'Connor is president of Chicago-based
NewEnergy Midwest, the leading provid-er of...
August 17, 2000
The firestorm raging in the San Diego area that devours homes and likely
will be followed in the spring by mudslides that will carry homes into
ravines isn't what Midwesterners are used to.
But there's no blaming Bad Ol' El Nino this time. The firestorm that has
everyone pointing fingers has to do with electric power shortages, rolling
blackout warnings and summer utility bills that have soared two and
threefold over last summer's.
To avoid "wearing the jacket," (in our Chicago patois), California's
voter-shy public officials and utility executives are blaming Bad Ol'
Deregulation.
Understandably, but regrettably, the media have tended to follow the story
line that electricity deregulation is to blame. Such stories could well
create worry that deregulation in Illinois and elsewhere in the Midwest will
lead to San Diego-style problems.
If anything, deregulation in the Midwest is avoiding the fundamental errors
California made, not only during the two years of deregulation but during
the decade preceding deregulation. In the summer of 1998 the Midwest had
some close calls of its own when triple-digit temperatures drove wholesale
electric prices for certain midday hours to as much as 100 times the normal
price.
The reigning theories in the California panic today are much like the myths
that emerged in the Midwest back then. There were allegations of price
gouging by power producers and warnings that we were moving too fast toward
deregulation--even though there was no retail deregulation and competition
in the Midwest at that time. In fact, it was the lack of retail,
customer-level competition that allowed the wholesale market to fly
completely out of control. Since 1998, the Midwest has begun to get its act
together.
In California, the initial reactions are to put the toothpaste back in the
tube and to burn the witch. But my native state still will need to face up
to its legacy of thinking, "I'll do that tomorrow," while at the same time
trying to regulate free markets as if there were no tomorrow.
Deregulation, which started in California in the spring of 1998, is but a
messenger of painful truths. The truth is that the chickens are coming home
to roost and that any attempt to retreat into the past will produce more
power shortages and higher prices.
There are some big differences between Illinois, the first state in the
Midwest to open up the electric network for customer choice, and California,
the first state in the nation to open up the network for competition.
In spite of a booming California economy spurring massive increases in
electrical demand, not one new power plant came on line during the
1990s--and none since. California thought it could rely on power plants in
other western states, but those plants are now serving growing loads in
their own areas.
In Illinois and elsewhere in the Midwest, new clean natural gas-fired plants
are able to serve during periods of peak demand. Gov. Ryan has convened a
committee to review state and local government handling of proposed "peaker"
plants. It seems likely to keep strict environmental standards in place
while helping to identify ways to reduce uncertainties, speed up
approvals--or disapprovals--and thereby reduce costs and improve power
reliability.
While the Midwest is realizing the benefit of newly constructed transmission
lines that allow access by Chicago and other areas to competitive power
supplies, many areas in California, remain too dependent on just a few local
power plants.
In California, once a utility finishes collecting "stranded-cost" charges to
pay off investments in nuclear plants and high-cost power contracts, price
caps for plain, old utility service based on rates in place prior to
deregulation are lifted. That's why San Diego Gas & Electric, the first
utility to finish collecting stranded costs, merely had the job of acquiring
power in the wholesale market and passing along the cost to customers who
had not switched to new competitive suppliers.
In Illinois and Ohio, by contrast, utility rates are capped at reduced
levels for at least five more years for customers who do not switch.
Illinois and the Midwest have stayed away from such Rube Goldberg
contraptions as the California Power Exchange that was supposed to serve as
a sort of mandatory clearing house for wholesale power transactions but
instead became a sort of private regulator that regulated no better than the
government used to.
The rules of the game in the Golden State could not have been more skewed
against giving opportunities for customers to switch to new competitors or
to take other precautions to avoid high summer power prices during an
unexpected heat wave. My NewEnergy colleagues in California have faced an
ever shifting set of increasingly inhospitable rules. In Illinois, utilities
and new competitive suppliers, have had more flexibility to offer products
that let customers choose between fixed prices that balance out the ups and
downs of the market or prices that float with the seasons.
Importantly, Illinois regulators have been reasonably quick to approve
proposals that let utilities and new suppliers, such as my company, work out
contracts with commercial and industrial customers to reduce their
electrical demand during peak summer hours in return for payments. Such
arrangements, less available in California, are key to avoiding blackouts
and blunting big-price spikes.
As chairman of the Illinois Commerce Commission from 1983 through 1985, I
remember when the costs of new nuclear plants showed up in electric
rates--today's stranded costs. I know what California utility commissioners
must be going through as they seek solutions for problems with roots going
back at least a decade. They'd better have thick skins and nimble minds.
I'll never forget former Gov. Jim Thompson, whose 1982 campaign I co-managed
and who appointed me to the ICC, saying, after several big rate increases,
the political equivalent of "I've never seen this man before in my entire
life." Having been yelled at on the bus by angry consumers a few times on
the way to the office, I could only be happy that Thompson had the good
political judgment to say, "I know not the man," on his own without my
prompting. I felt proud, not betrayed.

David I. Fein
PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE
203 North LaSalle Street
Suite 1800
Chicago, Illinois  60601
312-368-3462
(Fax) 312-630-7418
david.fein@piperrudnick.com

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


Today was a very difficult day for us as market uncertainty continued.  Recent news reports, including The Wall Street Journal article today, have speculated about possible mergers, takeovers and equity investors as options that Enron is considering.  The reason you have not seen us responding to these reports is that it is our corporate policy not to comment on market speculation.  However, I will tell you that we are evaluating all options to protect the financial stability of this company.  I will keep you updated on developments as they occur.


Notes from subject mtg.  Steve Stein - please schedule something where we can
get together and I can hand this off to you.  Need your involvement.

0)  Prior to the meeting - I had called Ben to let him know of my
transitioning to EES and that I wouldn't be there - he requested that I
come.  Keith Dodson reviewed and requested that I attend and xtion w/ Steve
Stein.  Steve Stein was to come to meeting, but didn't show.  Steve has been
requested to take charge by Keith Dodson.
1) Kay Mann, Ben Jacoby, Chris Booth, Ron Tapscott, and myself were present
at the subject meeting.
2)  Noone from EAS came except for me.  I called and Rigby came late.
3)  Discussed situation - Calpine evidently bought the Nov01 Westinghouse
Machine from Westinghouse, ending Calpine's interest in our "wet" 501D5A.
4)  Everyone agreed that Westinghouse wasn't "focussed" on resolving this.
Kay reminded the group that prior to litigating the contract called for a
"high level Mgmt meeting".  Everyone seemed to agree that it was time to call
such a meeting.
5)  Rigby to draft a rebutal letter to the 15 Feb Westinghouse letter (where
they again inferred that they had delivered the Generator, and if we wanted
the new one....., we needed to provide a purchase order).  In that letter,
Rigby will confirm that a)  we don't believe the machine was ever delivered,
b)  we have been delayed/impeded, and c)  LD's to the tune of approx $4MM are
due, and c)  we request the "high level mgmt meeting" prior to initiating
litigation.
6)  Letter will go out with Dan Shultz's signature - need highest level just
below Keith Dodson.  Since Dan had been involved...., the team chose him.  We
might consider putting the letter out under Steve Stein's name.  The letter
will also request that all future correspondance be addressed to John Rigby
(this was Ben Jacoby's request).
7)  Ben requested that if Dan Shultz gets any documents or calls......, that
he refer them to John Rigby.
8)  Kay to edit letter and get out the door Fri 23 Feb.
9)  Rigby working w/ Jim Boullion to expedite insurance
inspection/verification of coverage.  Bouillion will keep Rigby appraised.
Inspection needed ASAP to confirm Generator is "totalled".  Evidently, the
crate has now been opened, but....., our insurance inspector hasn't come
yet.
10)  Rigby to send email to Ben Jacoby's team every two days, detailing
progress/req'ed action.  The entire team is disappointed in the combined lack
of effectiviness of the "team" in getting this issue handled/resolved.
11)  Ben requested that EAS have their best resouce available to inspect the
generator with the insurance inspector - the team believes this should be Jim
Sutherland or his designee/equivalent.  Chris Booth to acompany also.
12)  Kay Mann confirmed that she had discussed the situation with the ENA
origination team that was "... on the ground..." at VEPCO...., and they
thought it was funny that anyone would think that the slipped Generator
delivery date didn't "delay or impede" our efforts to close that deal.  Also,
Kay reminded us that there was no tie between a specific project, and the
"delay/impede".
13)  At the high level Westinghouse meeting - who will be the senior Enron
rep?  Kevin Presto was discussed by Kay/Ben.  I discussed Steve Stein.  To be
discussed further.  At that high level meeting....., we need to insure that
Westinghouse sees that Enron really was "delayed/impeded" .  Until they
believe our claim for LD's has merit - they probably won't attempt to
compromise on a settlement.  Westinghouse has offered to give us our money
back (not confirmed, but Mark has offered to run that up the flagpole).  Ben
has requested approx $4MM more to cover IDC.  Westinghouse has said.... "no
way".  So...., we have approx a $4MM dispute.  Westinghouse doesn't believe
we have been delayed or impeded - they are not aware that we were in fact
impeded on Electrocities, nor are they aware of the broad interpretation of
delay/impede that would require them to pay LD's.  The team believes
Westinghouse is acting like they "delivered" the generator (in June 00), so
they can "act" like there should be even another reason that they don't owe
LD's.  The team believes that Siemen's position on "delivery" will change
once they debate that with a Rigby, Schwartzenburg, or a Kay Mann

Fred Kelly
Phone     713-646-6207
Mobile     713-851-9172


You still have my support.  Let me know if I can be helpful in any way.


i was going to come home this weekend if you knew them.  we would have to set
up a service contract with those chicks.


I bet Neil is feel Roscoe's pain!  I need to check the weather.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 09:39 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Westinghouse - Gleason

There's nothing special here.  Just cloudy.

I took Roscoe in to get neutered.  Neil just couldn't handle it.  Men are so
funny like that.  Now I'm going to run some errands.  I hope the weather gets
better for this evening.  They are still covering the weather 100% on the tv,
and it looks like it is getting better.  Still more of a deal south of here.

Kay


(See attached file: HPLN0208.xls)

 - HPLN0208.xls


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, February 6, 2001

FORMER MONTANA GOVERNOR MARC RACICOT JOINS
TEXAS LAW FIRM OF BRACEWELL & PATTERSON AS PARTNER

WASHINGTON - Former Montana Governor Marc Racicot will become a partner in
the Washington, DC office of the Texas-based law firm of Bracewell &
Patterson, L.L.P., the firm announced today.

"Governor Racicot will be a tremendous asset to Bracewell & Patterson and its
clients," said Managing Partner Kelly Frels. "He has an extraordinary record
of bringing businesses, government, consumer groups and others together to
find innovative solutions to major problems now facing many states and our
nation. The governor's extensive work dealing with environmental, natural
resource and energy issues will be especially helpful to Bracewell &
Patterson's clients across the nation."

The 2000 edition of The Almanac of American Politics describes Racicot as
"probably the nation's most popular governor" and says that in October 1998
his job approval rating was 87 percent, "about as high as you can go." The
publication also says: "At a time when Americans are eager for consensus and
agreement, Racicot has spoken often about the need for civility and listening
to others."

Racicot, who joins Bracewell & Patterson on Feb. 12, said he decided to work
for the law firm "after extensive discussions with law firms located
throughout the United States."

"Bracewell & Patterson will give me the opportunity to continue working to
resolve some of the toughest public policy issues facing our nation today,
for the benefit of people around the country," Racicot said. "Bracewell &
Patterson's reputation for integrity and for finding bipartisan solutions to
problems are exactly what I was looking for after 27 years of public
service.  In addition, practicing law in Washington with Bracewell &
Patterson will enable me to lend support and assistance to President Bush and
his administration in the event that there may be appropriate occasions to do
so."

Racicot, 52, was elected governor of Montana in 1992 and 1996, winning with
79 percent of the vote in his re-election bid on the Republican ticket. His
term as governor expired January 2 this year.  Immediately before becoming
governor, he served for four years as Montana's attorney general.

After graduating from Carroll College in 1970 and from the University of
Montana Law School in 1973, Racicot served in the Army Judge Advocate Corps
from 1973 to 1976, as deputy Missoula County attorney from 1976 to 1977, and
as a Montana assistant attorney general and special prosecutor from 1977 to
1988.

Racicot was an early supporter of then-Gov. George W. Bush in 1997 in the
race for the presidency, helped round up support for Bush among fellow
Republican governors, and campaigned for Bush in the presidential race.

Racicot met and worked with a number of lawyers from Bracewell & Patterson
when he joined other lawyers in Florida to assist the Bush campaign in
resolving disputes about the outcome of the presidential election last year.

Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P. was founded in Houston in 1945 and is
headquartered there. The law firm - which is comprised of more than 340
attorneys - has seven offices in Texas. It also has offices in Washington,
DC; Northern Virginia; London; and Kazakhstan. Bracewell & Patterson provides
a broad range of legal assistance and business counsel to clients in all
industries and local governments.

In addition to Racicot, the law firm's public policy practice includes a
number of former government officials, among them: former Congressman Ed
Bethune (R-Arkansas), former Congressman Jim Chapman (D-Texas), and former
Comptroller of the Currency Robert L. Clarke.

More information on Bracewell & Patterson is available at its website at
www.bracepatt.com


Jim asked me to send to you the attached filing we submitted in the three
northeast RTO dockets (PJM, New York and New England) urging FERC to
consolidate the three RTOs into one based on the PJM market design structure.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks

Sarah


I am in London this week and have picked up your message with the
attachment.  If you could let me know what it is that you are trying to do
with this, then I will be glad to help you where I can.  Are you trying to
create  a job description to be used to search for a local candidate in
Japan?  Do you need a job description for internal purposes to create a
position on the Tokyo team?  Is this a job description that you want to use
in discussions that we may have with Eugenio Perez in a start up role for the
risk books?  These three options would all require slightly different
descriptions of the role, so it would be helpful to know how you will use
this.

Please let me know and I will be glad to work on this for you.


Hi guys,

Here's a list of questions as I'm working through MDEA.  Actually, some are
questions, some are reminders of things you were going to send me:

Receipt Point - need def'n  RR
Load info - I was going to plug in something, or we were going to have an
exhibit to describe.  RR
Off peak defn - RR
transmission - we've added transmission services, but it isn't defnd.  Any
suggestions?
scheduling equipment - do we want to refer to the list?
term - previously I was instructed to take out the evergreen renewal, now is
it back in?  If so, is the mechanism in the first draft ok?
contracted resources - I've added in a def'n - we need a schedule. Name,
date, subject matter of contract.

More questions to come, but I wanted to get this to you asap.  Reagan, you
might want to look through the comments you gave me for more open items.

Thanks!

Kay


Yup, I'm in TX and I'm retired.  I'm about to go load up my mtn bike for
a midday ride.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:23 AM
To: Joan Wagner {ifsg230}
Subject: RE: Merger?

interesting to say the least.  great case for b-school.  you still in
texas?

-----Original Message-----
From: Joan.Wagner@bus.utexas.edu [mailto:Joan.Wagner@bus.utexas.edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:02 AM
To: Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com
Subject: Merger?

Ineteresting times at Enron.  Hang in there...

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


i have that work trip on oct. 21st.  is there another weekend that you could
come to n.o.?


Mary:  Do you want to answer Laurel?  I haven't heard anything further about
"paperless confirms".  I'll also ask Mark for an update.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 06:36 PM -----

	Laurel Adams
	03/06/2001 03:55 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL confirmations

Ladies,

Could one of you please tell me what is Legal's position on generating
confirms for EOL trades?  I was under the impression (evidently false) that
we did NOT send confirms for gas  deals done on EOL.  I did hear that legal
was currently reviewing this issue.  Do you know where it stands, or who the
best person to contact about this would be?  Please let me know.

We are looking to do some confirm automation (at last, at last!) and one of
the issues we are looking at is do we REALLY need to send paper confirms for
trades done on EOL.  It seems that it would just give someone one more chance
to dispute the trade.

Mary, I was at the DCAF conference where you spoke on the issue of electronic
confirmtions and on line trading, but I don't remember how far Enron was on
these issues.

Sara,  It seems like we talked about this as part of a larger conversation on
web-based confirms.

I would be grateful to hear both of your thoughts/concerns related to the
above.

Thanks very much for your help!


Mark for one hundred deals on Clickpaper reached !!!


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012683&Page=
MyReq.


Thanks for your quick reply.  With regards to the classes, I looked into U
of H for summer classes and they did not provide graduate level summer
classes.  The only school that provided graduate level summer classes was the
University of St. Thomas.  It would have been nice to take these classes at U
of H, because our Chairman and CEO and my recommender to The Texas Business
School, Ken Lay, received his PhD from there.
 Thanks again for your response and advice and hope all is going well.

Regards,
Ben


My brain is fried.  Can you remember what kind of opt in-out thing the CPUC
had?  I remember it being a fiasco.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/21/2000 12:27 PM -----

	Lynnette Barnes
	11/21/2000 11:55 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: California customer marketing question

---------------------- Forwarded by Lynnette Barnes/NA/Enron on 11/21/2000
01:54 PM ---------------------------

Lynnette Barnes
11/21/2000 01:54 PM
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: California customer marketing question

Sue,
 Frank Rishe has ask me to search for the states that have allowed customers
to opt in or out of marketing lists. Does California require utilities to
offer a customer the opportunity to decide on who they want to market to them
for energy services? If so did we take a position on it?

 Thank you so very much,
 Lynnette


Good Morning!

Bottom line: No Changes.

For the near term (1-5), we see some cool anomalies arriving into the Dakotas by Monday already, with highs in the Dakotas in the mid-30s and lows in the mid-teens.By Tuesday, Texas and the Midwest will be in the below normal category, with Dallas overnights in the mid-30s (normal low 43), Houston's low in the mid-40s (normal upper-40s) and Chicago will freeze, with a mid-20 overnight.  Progressing into the Northeast by wednesday, Philly and New York will get into the below normal category, but 5 or 6 degree anomalies are most likely.  Looks like a three day event as it moves easterly and then is followed by moderation into the...

6-10 Day time period, which will see a cool shot over the Midwest/East towards next weekend, moderating again by early the following week. Then, early in the...

11-15 Day time period, more cool air moves in, beginning with central cooling, then even into the Southeast.

So, with normals dropping across the nation, this first cool air anomaly event arriving in the Midwest by Tuesday will elevate the nation's gas demand requirements into the 60 Bcf/d plus regime from here on through the winter.  Here's the strip beginning with today:

Sat 	11/17	47 Bcfd
Sun	11/18	52 Bcfd
Mon	11/19	55 Bcfd
Tue	11/20	67 Bcfd
Wed	11/21	69 Bcfd
Thu	11/22	65 Bcfd
Fri	11/23	65 Bcfd
Sat	11/24	63 Bcfd
Sun	11/25	63 Bcfd
Mon	11/26	65 Bcfd
Tue	11/27	65 Bcfd

Till tomorrow,

The Weather Team


Please review and offer comments/approval.

Dale


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

 - 10-19 1600 Report.xls


Dan,  Any input you have on this contract would be appreciated.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 04:11 PM -----

	Lauri A Allen
	12/05/2000 02:53 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward.D.Gottlob@enron.com
		 Subject: Texas General Land Office IT Transport

Gerald/Eric-

I have a couple of questions regarding TGLO transport contract
012-88494-202.  We are currently delivering a volume of 28.000mm into various
Midcon interconnects on this contract that are designated to go to
Reliant/Entex for the purpose of heating HISD schools.  The transport
contract stipulates different rates for this delivery depending on whether
the gas is intended for state facilities or not.  My first question, then,
is:  are HISD schools considered state facilities?  And, if HISD schools are
considered state facilities, does the fact that this gas is being delivered
to them via Reliant/Entex utilizing Midcon's pipe make any difference?

I am asking these questions not only to assure that we are recouping the
correct transport rate, but also to determine what the consequences might be
if I interrupt this delivery.  We are having difficulty getting enough gas
into Midcon to cover our Entex noms and I am just exploring my options.  I
would also expect that this volume should decrease when HISD closes for the
Christmas holidays- does the fact that this is an IT agreement give me enough
leverage to cut this nom if TGLO does not do so voluntarily?

Thanks for your help.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chad Starnes/Corp/Enron on 01/05/2001
03:23 PM ---------------------------

Rudy Acevedo@ECT
01/05/2001 01:27 PM
To: Chad Starnes
cc:

Subject: here it is

---------------------- Forwarded by Rudy Acevedo/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001 01:27
PM ---------------------------

Rudy Acevedo
11/10/2000 01:17 PM
To: Larry Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: here it is


Let's continue to buy Socal  for the rest of the month.  I would like to sell
Rockies, and remian neutral on Permian and San Juan, unless it looks like the
maint on washington ranch will have a bullish effecst on the basins.  I will
leave it up to you to determine.  I will call later.

Mike


left message with sean - he's in offsite meeting right now - his trade log
says simply balance of the month deal.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/05/2001 02:01 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/5/01 Checkout

Amerex

Sean Crandall:
deal 537943
Amerex shows term as 3/8-3/31......enpower has 3/7-3/31

Prebon
All deals checked out fine.

Bloomberg
All deals checked out fine.


Greg,
I am getting the following error message when I hit my top page macro.
"Run-time error '3146': ODBC call failed".
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q195/2/25.asp

Any thoughts on a fix?

Thanks,

Dan


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 10:33 AM -----

	"EEI Energy Delivery Group" <EDGroup@eei.org>
	10/12/2000 03:17 PM

		 To: <Anthony.Duenner@enron.com>, <chris.gaffney@enron.com>,
<dallegre@enron.com>, <ddornan@enron.com>, <dfossum@enron.com>,
<dfulton@enron.com>, <eaafedt@enron.com>, <fbay@enron.com>,
<fking@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <JKeller@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <julia.murray@enron.com>, <Lhuber@enron.com>,
<mary.hain@enron.com>, <meyer@enron.com>, <mpavlou@enron.com>,
<rfrank@enron.com>, <scorman@enron.com>, <scovino@enron.com>,
<skean@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>, <stweed@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RTO FILINGS SUMMARIES

EEI Presents . . .

RTO Summaries: The October Filings

Full summaries of the October RTO Filings, available in pdf format, no later
than October 30, 2000. Order Today!

RTO Summaries: The October Filings

This timely, essential, cost-effective resource will include:

?  Introduction and Summary Matrix of Each RTO filing

?  Coverage for each RTO filing:
   -  Each of the twelve characteristics and functions
      -  What is proposed
      -  How it comports with Order No. 2000
   -  Additional Comments

?  Summary of individual company filings to join an RTO or alternative filing

?  Individual map of each RTO

Plan Ahead and Order EEI's RTO Summaries: The January Filings Now.
Buy both sets and save.

RTO Summaries: The October Filings
Item # 13-00-14
List Price: $995.00
EEI Associate Members: $895.00
EEI Utility Members: $795.00
Government: $195.00

RTO Summaries: The January Filings
Item # 13-00-05
List Price: $995.00
EEI Associate Members: $895.00
EEI Utility Members: $795.00
Government: $195.00

RTO Summaries: The October and January Filings
Item # 13-00-06
List Price: $1895.00
EEI Associate Members: $1695.00
EEI Utility Members: $1495.00
Government: $295.00

Ordering information:

Call EEI at 1-800-EEI-5453 (U.S. & Canada) or 301-645-4222 (International) to
place your order.  Once payment has been received, a pdf file will be
e-mailed to you.

Product Questions:
Contact Jay Carriere at (202) 508-5525 or jcarriere@eei.org


The Commission discussed its market based rate policy at today's meeting.  They did not vote out an order today, but expect to take up this issue again next meeting.  The staff memo recommended the following:

For an interim period, FERC will deal with pending requests for market based rates and with triennial reviews of those rate authorizations, using a new test called the "Supply Margin Assessment" (also called a jazzed up version of the hub and spoke test) where a seller's capacity will be reviewed against the generation reserve margin in a market.  The test takes into account constraints based on TTC.  If the capacity of a seller is not necessary to meet peak demand,the seller does not have market power.  This test is applicable to all markets that are not part of an existing RTO or ISO.  For those selling into an RTO/ISO, the FERC will continue to allow market based rates subject to the market monitor and mitigation.

Staff also recommends that FERC initiate a Section 206 investigation to require each seller with market based rate authority to change its tariff by adding a provision stating that if the seller acts in an anticompetitive manner, the FERC can require refunds.  Through questioning by Commissioner Massey, it was revealed that, even if a seller did not engage in bad behavior, but sold into a disfunctional market, refunds could be required.  In the staff memo, apparently staff had left vague the definition of anticompetitive behavior in order to be able to interpret it most broadly.  However, Commissioners asked staff to better define the anticompetitive actions that could trigger refunds.  This policy will be brought up again at the next Commission meeting on October 11.  It will be issued as a proposed action, giving parties an opportunity to comment within 15 days and then also file reply comments,  Final action is expected within 60-90 days.

Last, for the long-term, FERC will hold outreach meetings looking for answers as to how to detect market power and what to do when it is detected.

Since the interim measure is only a "snapshot" approach according to Commissioner Massey, he is willing to support it only along with the above described tariff provision.  Commissioner Breathitt is very uncomfortable with an open refund requirement, stating that it adds to regulatory uncertainty at a time when the Commission is most interested in giving certainty to the industry in order to assure reliability.


I started calculating the bankruptcy book last night for the credit group.  This needs to be done nightly.  I may be out a few days so if I am can someone else take this over from me please?  We can also use these to check daily for counterparties that have been moved incorrectly.

The file is in O:\erms\1intra\west\Bankruptcy post-ids.xls

Thanks

KK


any luck w/ my paycheck


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 25, 2001

Notice ID: 3213
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

Individuals from the following teams will be on duty (from 8:00 a.m. until
10:00 p.m.) in Customer Services on Saturday, October 27, 2001 and Sunday,
October 28, 2001:

NOMINATIONS & CONFIRMATIONS

Team 2 (Sat. only)       304-357-3704
Team 3 (Sun. only)       304-357-3701

Individuals from Team 1 (Evening Shift) will be on duty (from 2:00 p.m. to
10:00 p.m.) October 29 through November 2, 2001:

NOMINATIONS & CONFIRMATIONS

Team 1                   304-357-3708

Please note that the Columbia Navigator system is unavailable every Sunday from
11:00 p.m. until Monday at 6:00 a.m. for routine system maintenance.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


UN WIRE
An Independent News Briefing about the United Nations
-------------------------------------------------------
Friday, 13 October, 2000 - http://www.unfoundation.org

Today's UN WIRE Stories

HEALTH
 1 TOBACCO: Industry Pushes For Limited Regulations
 2 HIV/AIDS: UNAIDS Teaches Prevention To Ukraine Sex Workers
 3 BLINDNESS: UK Group Seeks To Raise Awareness

WOMEN, CHILDREN AND POPULATION
 4 AMERICAS: PAHO Outlines Advances Achieved In Child Health
 5 CHILD MORTALITY: World Reaches Target, Some Countries Behind
 6 CHILD LABOR: ILO, Netherlands Join Forces To Aid Bangladesh

ENVIRONMENT
 7 CHINA: Red Tides Are Blight To Country's Coastlines
 8 CLEANER PRODUCTION: Experts To Consider Alternative
Approaches
 9 JORDAN: IUCN Deems Country Center For Water Programs Project

ECONOMICS, TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT
 10 UNCTAD: Report Says Least Developed Nations Struggling
 11 YUGOSLAVIA: Milosevic Party Members Agree To Resume Talks
 12 OIL: Prices Could Dampen World Growth, IMF Says
 13 DIAMONDS: Sierra Leone Lifts Ban On Gem Exports

HUMANITARIAN AID AND FOOD SECURITY
 14 WORLD FOOD PRIZE: Two Scientists Earn Award For Maize Hybrid

HUMAN RIGHTS, JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY
 15 INDONESIA: Speakers Oppose Militia Leader's Extradition
 16 RWANDA: UN Report Examines Prison Crisis
 17 BOSNIA: War Crimes Suspect Dies In Arrest Attempt

CRIME, CORRUPTION AND DRUGS
 18 ASIA: Countries Commit To Anti-Drug Plan

PEACEKEEPING AND SECURITY
 19 MIDDLE EAST: Israel Attacks Palestinian Targets; More
 20 LANDMINES: Myanmar Gov't, Opposition Continue Production

GET THE FULL SCOOP

These stories and the complete issue of today's UN Wire
can be found on the Web at http://www.unfoundation.org.
The Web version includes hot-links to the complete text
of cited articles, a fully searchable archive and easy
access to recent issues.

ACCESS RECENT ISSUES at
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwire/archives/index.cfm

UN Wire is a free service sponsored by the United Nations
Foundation and its sister organization, the Better World
Fund, which are dedicated to supporting United Nations
efforts on behalf of the environment, population stabilization
and children's health.  UN Wire is produced independently by
National Journal Group (http://www.nationaljournal.com).  For
the latest information and updates on UN Foundation activities,
visit us on the web at http://www.unfoundation.org.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2000 National Journal.

Telephone: (703) 518-8759
Fax:       (703) 519-6377
Email:     unwire@unfoundation.org

Editor in Chief:  Steve Hirsch
--------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the UN Wire Notification Service, go to
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwirelogin/unf_listadmin.cfm

Questions, concerns and comments can be sent to
unwire@unfoundation.org.

UN news and other submissions should be directed to
unwire-submit@unfoundation.org.

You are currently subscribed to unfoundation-unwire as:
klay@enron.com

To subscribe, visit the UN Wire Web site at:
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwirelogin/unf_listadmin.cfm
and enter your email address. Registration is required.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to the address below:
leave-unfoundation-unwire-290701M@lists.unfoundation.org
--------------------------------------------------------------


Our next cargo has a loading window in PDVSA on May 18, 2001, with an ETA in
ProCaribe on May 19 - 21, 2001.  The cargo is for 10,000 Mts. (5.2MM gallons)
at MB + 7 three days around bill of lading.  This means that the invoice will
be the average price of MB on the loading day, the day before and the day
after, excluding weekends and holidays, plus 7 cents a gallon.

The following are the monthly sales average per customer:

* Progasco  1,100,000 gallons
* San Juan Gas     210,000 gallons
* Centro Gas                  140,000 gallons

Total borrowing return to EcoEl,ctrica 3,200 Mts or 1,667,200 gallons on
5/19/01.

After returning all the borrowing (5/19/01) we have a balance of 3,480,233
gallons.  The following are the estimated sales and heater consumption per
month:

* May (12 days)    563,520 gallons (from May 20th through May 31st)
* June (30 days)  1,408,800 gallons
* July  (31 days)  1,455,760 gallons

Inventory balance as of: 7/31/01 (52,153 gallons).

Next cargo arrival delivery window July 20 - 31, 2001.

Saludos


Do you have any of their cd's?  The one with the song "Shackles"?  I was listening to it this morning and I thought about you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Angelic
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 11:17 AM
To:	Davis, Dana
Subject:	RE:

Yes.  I love their music.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Dana
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 11:15 AM
To:	Davis, Angelic
Subject:	RE:

Have you heard of Mary Mary?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Angelic
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Davis, Dana
Subject:	RE:

I listen to both.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Dana
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Davis, Angelic
Subject:

My Instant Messenger isn't working for some reason but all I wanted was to ask you do you listen to gospel music and what kind if you do?  Traditional or contemporary?


Thought you guys might like to know that our voice mail system is down until
later this afternoon. Also, I'm filling in for one of the California
Schedulers who'll be out of the office for an indefinite period. Please reach
me on this extension until further notice (yours and mine!):

(503) 464-3827

Or, if it's an emergency and you can't seem to make it out of the tangled web
of receptionists and other phone-answerers, call my cell phone at (503)
819-2181. And of course, there's always e-mail.

I apologize for the confusion and for any inconvenience this may cause.
Thanks for bearing with us!

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/26/2001 08:37 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Guzman                           04/25/2001 08:47 PM

To: Portland West Desk
cc:

Subject: Voice Mail Outage 4/25-4/26

At approximately 6:30 pm on 4/25 Ruth Ashe with PGE notified Enron that there
will be a voice mail outage starting the evening of 4/25 and running thru 2pm
on 4/26.  If you have any questions or concerns please contact her at
503-464-8663 or 503-323-1254.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.


The attached news release was sent over PRNewswire early this morning.

(See attached file: Evista Early Effects Release.doc)

 - Evista Early Effects Release.doc


Thank you for your help.

	ISC Hotline
	03/15/2001 10:32 AM

Sent by: Randi Howard
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: My "P" Number

Mr. Skilling:

Your P number is P00500599.  For your convenience, you can also go to
http://isc.enron.com/site/ under Site Highlights and reset your password or
find your "P" number.

Thanks,

Randi Howard
ISC HOTLINE

	From:  Jeff Skilling                           03/15/2001 10:01 AM

To: ISC Hotline/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: My "P" Number

Could you please forward my "P" number.  I am unable to get into the XMS
system and need this ASAP.

Thanks for your help.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
04:42 PM ---------------------------

Kate Lucas
12/22/2000 02:56 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Mauricio
Mora/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: CORRECTION: interim report to Gary Hickerson for ag trading

Apologies. Please note that I pasted the wrong graph in the previous version
I sent. This is the correct version.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Lucas/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000 02:56 PM
---------------------------

Kate Lucas
12/22/2000 02:27 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Mauricio
Mora/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: interim report to Gary Hickerson for ag trading

Vince,

Please find attached the interim report on agricultural commodity trading for
Gary Hickerson. Your comments are welcome as we would like to send this to
Gary as soon as possible.

Regards,
Kate
ext 3-9401


Daren,

Texlan revised their nom at meter # 6788 from 166/d to 365/d for July.  Do
you want me to adjust?

Bob


I will be at an EIM Forms Review offsite this afternoon beginning at 1 at the
Doubletree Hotel.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Daily Blessing

An Invitation
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch1.htm

Recipe for Joy
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch47.htm

Hundred's of you have taken advantage of the free download available for the
Work From Home folks.  If you haven't checked it out yet...you should!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjworkfromhome.htm

do you check your email more often than your calendar?  free download

http://www.daily-blessings.com/reminder.htm

FORGET PC PHONE. GET REAL LONG DISTANCE AT NO COST bigredwire is the first
and only company to offer REAL long distance at no cost
Switch your long distance to bigredwire and get REAL long distance at zero
cost to you. Up to 100 complimentary minutes everyday when you zap your
online bill. If you don't zap, pay only 5 cents a minute without fees. Switch
now!
find out how at http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjbigredwire.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


Please note:

Per Sally, the 9:00 AM Doorstep meeting scheduled for Friday (tomorrow) is
being shortened to 30 minutes (now 9:30-10:00 AM).

Thanks,
Patti x39106


Hi Lyn:

Alex Huang has requested a new PC and Vince Kaminski has ok'd it.  Please
order the computer as listed below in Alex's request.

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
01:48 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
01/07/2000 12:12 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: New PC

Shirley,

OK.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
12:02 PM ---------------------------

Alex Huang@ENRON
01/07/2000 08:28 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New PC

Hi Shirley,
I would like to request for a new PC.  My current PC is quite old with not
enough memory.  Twice
I ran out of memory and had to have IT people coming to clean it for me.
Their suggestion is
to either get a new hard drive or a new PC.  Given that Dell has Pentiumc III
Processor at 800 MHz
on market, I would like to request a PC with process at 500 MHz or higher
level.
Thank you very much.

Best,
Alex


Would you be ready to roll around 7:15 a.m.?  I will be glad to come to your
house.  Let me know.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:12 AM
To: pyoung@pdq.net
Subject: RE: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

It's just you and me tomorrow.  Soma is having furniture delivered from
Star and they said they could only come between 8-12.  So shall we drive
together?  Do you want to come to my house?  At what time?

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
                    et>                  cc:
                                         Subject:     RE: Nutcracker
Market/Saturday
                    11/09/2000
                    04:53 PM

Of course.  Do you two want to be there for the early show or I could just
meet you there later?

Also, you can sign up on the internet for the early bird show.  I don't
think you can pay when you get there, except if you go at 10 a.m.

www.houstonballet.org  Look it up here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:27 PM
To: pyoung@pdq.net
Subject: Re: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

I'm interested!  Would it be OK to invite one of my new business people
from London, she doesn't know anyone in Houston yet?

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     "Tana Jones"
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    et>                  cc:
                                         Subject:     Nutcracker
Market/Saturday
                    11/09/2000
                    04:01 PM

Miss Tana,

Are you interested in going to the Nutcracker Market this Saturday morning
and being there for the early bird special (8 a.m.)??  It costs $25 to get
in early, but that covers $10 admission, $5 parking, coffee and
refreshments.  Otherwise, you can go at 10 a.m., pay $10 to get in with the
rest of the crowd and $5 for parking.  I think I am going to plan to be
there around 7:40-7:45.  Let me know if you are interested.

Patti


403-974-6706
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	david_paul_smith@attbi.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:37 PM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	fax#

Zuf:

Howdy!  I hope all is well.

What is your fax# @ work?

Brother Smith


Kevin,

No problem.

Vince

Kevin G Moore
07/12/2000 01:20 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Lunch for Staff Meeting July 20th

 July 20th we will celebrate Shirley's birthday therefore I asked her
if she would mind if I ordered lunch for the staff meeting whereby she
can relax during that  time period. (without pressure to get the lunch ready)

On July 20th I would like too  have a different caterer for our lunch ,they
will basically
serve the same menu with a different style hopefully the group will enjoy
the meal.

The menu will include : assorted sandwiches
                                                         chips
                                                        soup
                                                     Iced Tea

                       (vegetarian sandwiches included)

Please Vince, inform me if this is okay !

                      Thanks
                          Kevin Moore

F.Y.I.       the price range is very close to what Marriott charges per person


I didn't get the attachment.  If you want my thoughts, please let me know.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Huddleson, Diann; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.
Cc:	Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PG&E

I would ask Mike about the last sentence in bullet 5.  Based on the language of the quote the Commission appears to be referring to the surcharge "adopted in D. 01-03-082."  Was the .01 surcharge "adopted" in that proceeding?  Maybe I am reading this too literally.  I do agree that the rationale for exempting DA customers from the 3 cent surcharge applies equally to the 1 cent surcharge, and that we should continue to strive for this clarification at the CPUC (which Sue Mara is handling).  Sue, I am forwarding this to you for your comments.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 9:49 AM
To:	Curry, Wanda; Huddleson, Diann; Tribolet, Michael; Williams, Robert C.; Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	FW: PG&E

please let me know if any of you disagree/have comments
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Simmons, Linda J.
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:49 PM
To:	Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	FW: PG&E

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	Simmons, Linda J.
Subject:	RE: PG&E

Here is our settlement sheet on the one cent surcharge, attached below.
Mike Day

 - X28655.DOC [Mellencamp, Lisa]   << File: X28655.DOC >>


in

Bryan Hull
10/30/2000 11:18 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Game at 6:00

Our game is at 6 this week.  Let me know if you can make it so I can find
subs if you can't.


You have the right Sally Beck.  I grew up around the corner from your dad and
used to eat Thursday fried chicken lunches at Tattie's house (now your house)
with Jim and the whole family.  Plus your mom and I used to spend the night
at each other's houses when we were in elementary school.  I had heard
through my sister Cara (who interviewed your grandad for a USTA publication)
that you were heading to Enron upon graduation.

I would love to visit with you about your experience so far at Enron.  Call
my assistant, Patti Thompson, at x39106 and let's set up a time to get
together.  Monday or Tuesday next week would be good.  I look forward to
seeing you.  By the way, our oldest daugher, age 16, is Meagan Worthing
Beck.   --Sally

Ashley Worthing@ENRON
11/10/2000 01:35 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Ms. Beck,

My name is Ashley Worthing and I just started with Enron about 3 months ago.
I was wondering if there is any possibility that your mothers name is Sue and
her maiden name is Worthing?  If I am completely off, I apologize in
advance...my father, aunt and uncles wanted me to see if I could find you, or
if this is you.

Thank you,

Ashley Worthing


Jerry:
Here is the ICF confidentiality agreement that Stuart revised.  Hope this is
to your satisfaction.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Ben


As far as I know it is fine.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 02/13/2001 10:42 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EWS Brown Bag Lunch

You are SUCH a social butterfly!

John wasn't available for lunch on Friday, so I went ahead an booked him for
Tuesday, February 20th.  Is that ok with you?  It's on your calendar.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	02/13/2001 10:38 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EWS Brown Bag Lunch

Yes.  At least now I don't also have lunch with John!

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 02/13/2001 10:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EWS Brown Bag Lunch

Don't you have another meeting over at the allen center on Thursday at 11am?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	02/13/2001 10:33 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EWS Brown Bag Lunch

I want to go to this on Thursday.  I rsvp'd myself.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/13/2001 10:32
AM ---------------------------
   ENA Public Relations
From: ENA Public Relations on 02/12/2001 10:21 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
cc:
Subject: EWS Brown Bag Lunch

MARK YOUR LUNCH CALENDARS NOW !

You are invited to attend the EWS Brown Bag Lunch Series

Featuring OZZIE PAGAN

Topic:  East Power
Origination & Trading

Thursday, February 15, 2001
11:30 am - 12:30 pm
EB 5C2

You bring your lunch,            Limited Seating
We provide drinks and dessert.           RSVP x 5-7352


Larry and Joe,

Is there any additional moral pressure that we can put on Westinghouse to get
the resources needed to expedite the resolution of the Gleason 501FD issues
and the vibration issues at Wheatland?  The phone call by Larry to GE has
made a world of difference.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000
08:18 PM ---------------------------

Gavin Gaul@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/17/2000 03:01 PM
To: Mark Dobler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike J
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey@ECT,
Robert P Virgo@ECT, Bill Fox/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis
Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Gleason Blade Ring Schedule

Mark,

We have been working diligently with Westinghouse to get a schedule for the
removal and modification of the blade rings at Gleason.  I requested
Westinghouse begin to prepare for this work on Sunday after you confirmed
that we could no longer tolerate the operating restriction being added to the
unit.  Based on discussions with Westinghouse on Sunday, we estimated that
the work could be completed in 14 days.  The site began disassembly of unit
#2 on Monday.  Unit #1 disassembly began on Tuesday because we had to wait
for the unit to cool down.

The first verbal schedule from Westinghouse was received Monday night.  It
showed the blade rings being machined in series at a single shop and resulted
in the lasy unit being delayed about 4 days.  I told Westinghouse this would
not be acceptable and that the blade rings needed to be machined in
parallel.  Westinghouse agreed and has made a second shop available.  Another
schedule was published yesterday afternoon that required an additional step
in the disassembly that I felt was not required and added a day to the
duration.  Westinghouse suggested that we remove the compressor blades from
the rotor before we remove the blade rings.  I have since concluded that
removing the rotor blades first is in fact the correct procedure.

As we discussed at the meeting this morning, this schedule for the blade
rings, which has been at the site since last night,  will be distributed to
everyone today.  In addition, the site will incorporate the remaining startup
activities and issue an integrated schedule tonight.

As we discussed at the meeting this morning, it is very unlikely that Gleason
#1 and #2 can be available by June 1.  Our optimistic estimate from the
meeting this morning was June 4-7.

Gavin

To: John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gavin
Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey@ECT, Robert P Virgo@ECT, Bill
Fox/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Gleason Blade Ring Schedule

John/Gavin -

We have made progress over the last week in getting GE attention focused on
the emissions problems at Lincoln.  After 6 days of daily conferences on the
subject, GE has arrived in force at Lincoln, with the personnel and resources
required to address the problem.  We are not out of the woods yet, but I
believe everything is now being done that can be done to get as many machines
available as possible by June 1.

Enron needs the same focus from Westinghouse, on  issues currently plagueing
Wheatland and Gleason.  Unlike Lincoln, where the machines are capable of
producing MW's, these two sites have units that cannot operate.  Namely,
vibration issues on units 1 and 2 at Wheatland and compressor blade ring
issues on units 1 and 2 at Gleason.

ENA has been requesting since Monday this week, a definitve and complete
schedule from EECC, showing the disassembly, shipping, machining, reassembly
and testing of units 1 and 2 blade rings at Gleason.  We still do not have
this schedule.  Furthermore, it would appear that after this morning's
meeting, there is some confusion on what work actually needs to be performed
in order to accomplish this task and what impact that may have on the 14-day
schedule committed to ENA by Gavin Gaul on 5/15.  I am not sure whether the
communication breakdown is between business units at Westinghouse or between
Enron and Westinghouse, but a schedule and plan is the first step towards
getting the work done and we are two days into the work.  I am expecting this
plan to be circulated today.

Lastly, although we have been verbally assured by Westinghouse that there
will be no operating restrictions, other than routine borescope inspections
during off-peak periods, OEC would be more comfortable getting this in
writing.  We are requesting a formal notice from Westinghouse, identifying
any operational restrictions (post-blade ring repair) on these units.

If there is any assistance you require, please do not hesitate to request
it.  We collectively have 14 days to declare all 15 units ready for
commercial operation.

MSD


Hey!

Kathy from EPE asked if we could start to put all the preschedules with the exception of the SPS studd in the original preschedule are and not in the direct bill area.

Geir


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

 Dear Daren:  From out of something as horrific as the events of September 11th has come something truly amazing - a growing sense of patriotism in America not felt for decades.   We've felt it here at iWon - in fact, we've had numerous iWon members write to us and ask if iWon sold American Flags. They've been hard to come by recently, but now, through the cooperation of The National Flag & Display Company, we're proud to offer American Flag Kits to our members.  Each kit includes one (1) 3' x 5' polyester flag, 3-piece 6' pole, styrene eagle and mounting bracket.    Click here to order your American Flag Kit  - and show your pride in our nation!    Thank you, The iWon Team 	[IMAGE]

Forgot your member name? It is: JDAREN  Forgot your iWon password? Click here .   You received this email because when you registered at iWon you agreed to  receive email from us. To unsubscribe from one or more email categories, please  click here . Please note, changes may take up to one week to process. If you're  not signed in, you will need to do so before you can update your profile.


Savita:
A couple of issues:

1.  I'm having trouble setting a syncopated basis child of a syncopated basis
child (grandchild).  Is this not currently allowed by the system?

2.   I have a lot of counterparties whom click on hub gas daily when they
meant to trade nymex.  Although I would like the nymex filter to bring gas
dailies, is there anyway to separate them a little more clearly.  Eventually
I would like to run all my products in parallel with gas daily, but I'm
restricted right now by issue #1.

Please advise,
John


Guys, we need your final review on next years budget (direct expense) for MW
Gas (Luce) and LT Gas Fundamentals/Transport Capacity (Gomez) done today.  We
are running out of time to finalize the budgeting process.  I would much
appreciate your assistance.

Regards
Delainey


Please give my EOL id the ability to trade Canadian Gas products.  My ID is
ADM81300.

Call me at 3-4743 if you have any questions.
Thanks


Michelle, I have talked to Steven Sheldon, Martin Sacchi, and soon to talk to Marc Hensel and Ed Smida as well as Michele Nezi Marvin re: broadband litigation support work.  Luckily for the effort, I think all of these people, with the exception of Steven have a longer term position at broadband or elsewhere at Enron.  If this group of people or some subset thereof remains at Enron then I think we can get good litigation services from them re: broadband claims.  Call me if you have any questions.  Sherron.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watkins, Sherron
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 4:56 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Broadband litigation work

I'm wanting to use Martin Saachi and Steven Sheldon, both directors from EBS.  The quant work would be people from Vince's shop that are probably not as effected by the 'surplusing'.  I'll confirm Monday.  Thanks, Sherron.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Watkins, Sherron
Cc:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	RE: Broadband litigation work

I need to have the names as soon as possible, even if they may choose not to do it.  Thanks.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watkins, Sherron
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 4:32 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Broadband litigation work

Michele - I have not yet gotten a hold of the 2 individuals I'd like to work with on this.  Mark H. had asked me not speak to them until after I'd met with Richard Sanders.  At any rate, I should be able to speak to them next week and get their names to you - I want to ensure that they want to work on the project.  I'll be in touch as soon as possible next week.  Regards, Sherron

Sherron S. Watkins
Vice President, Enron Corp.
713-345-8799 office
713-416-0620 cell


how many ounces does that little runt bailey weigh?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i am not lying.  i know i said yesterday that i got a poodle but i was just
kidding about that part.  i really did get a chihuahua.  i really don't
understand why you don't believe me, it makes no sense.  have i ever lied to
you before?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:13 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

now i know you are lying.  yesterday the lie was about a poodle.  why can't
you just be honest with me?  the lies and deceit hurt me erin.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:02 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   i didn't get a poodle, poodles are worthless dogs.  i got a chihuahua.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:57 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   what color is your poodle

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
   NRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:42 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      ok, i will.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:39 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      sweet.  you can start by picking up the tab at capital grill.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
      NRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:13 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         alright, not a problem.  i have lots of money to spend.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:46 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         both

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
         NRON@ENRON.com]

            Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:31 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            pay for both of us or just me?

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:31 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            pay more than i want.  so from now on you need to pay when we
   go
      out.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
            NRON@ENRON.com]

               Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:26 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               the dog is a couple of months old.  so, are you going to pay
      more
            than
               you
               want to or just lower your standards?

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:24 AM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               i havent looked anymore.  i will look this weekend.   i
   think i
         need
            to
               pay
               more than i want to.  how old is your dog?

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
               NRON@ENRON.com]

                  Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:31 AM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  whatever, you don't have to believe me but i did get a
   dog
            yesterday.
                  melisa and i went to lunch and then went and got the dog.
      she
            took
               the
                  afternoon off so she kept it until i got off work. now do
      you
            believe
                  me?
                  have you found a place to live yet or are you going to be
            homeless?

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                  Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:20 AM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject: RE:

                  i don't believe you b/c i don't think you would not have
   had
         time
            to
               get
                  it
                  yesterday when you said you had it

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
   @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                  NRON@ENRON.com]

                     Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:13 AM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:  RE:

                     why don't you believe me?  i am not lying!

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
            [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                     Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:11 AM
                     To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                     Subject: RE:

                     stop lying

                         -----Original Message-----
                        From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
      @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                     NRON@ENRON.com]

                        Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:02 AM
                        To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                        Subject:  RE:

                        she isn't imaginary.  her name is bailey.

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
               [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                        Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:36 AM
                        To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                        Subject: RE:

                        this situation reminds me of kids with imaginary
      friends.
            what
               is
                     your
                        imaginary friend's name?

                            -----Original Message-----
                           From:   Erin Richardson
   <erichardson@sarofim.com>
         @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                        NRON@ENRON.com]

                           Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:18 AM
                           To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                           Subject:  RE:

                           i got plenty of sleep.  my puppy is a perfect
      angel.
         i
            am
               not
                     sure
                        if i
                           am
                           ever going to let you see it since you don't
      believe
         me.
               you
                     should
                           trust
                           me.

                           -----Original Message-----
                           From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                  [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                           Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:49 AM
                           To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                           Subject: RE:

                           did you get any sleep last night with your new
   dog?
         when
            do
               i
                  get
                     to
                           see
                           this alleged dog? you probably got one of those
         robotic
               dogs.
                     what
                        is
                           its
                           name?

                               -----Original Message-----
                              From:   Erin Richardson
      <erichardson@sarofim.com>
            @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                           NRON@ENRON.com]

                              Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:27 PM
                              To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                              Subject:  RE:

                              no, i would win that bet, it is just annoying
      that
         you
               keep
                     trying
                        to
                              get
                              out of taking me to dinner.  i am not letting
      you
         out
            of
               it.

                              -----Original Message-----
                              From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                     [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                              Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:14 PM
                              To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                              Subject: RE:

                              why?  don't you think you would lose that
   bet?

                                  -----Original Message-----
                                 From:   Erin Richardson
         <erichardson@sarofim.com>
               @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                              NRON@ENRON.com]

                                 Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:01
   PM
                                 To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                 Subject:  RE:

                                 stop trying to get out of the dinner.

                                 -----Original Message-----
                                 From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                        [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                 Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:01 PM
                                 To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                 Subject: RE:

                                 lets bet your dinner on it right now.  i
      think i
            might
                  need
                     to
                        pay
                           up
                              to
                                 get a house

                                     -----Original Message-----
                                    From:   Erin Richardson
            <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                  @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                                 NRON@ENRON.com]

                                    Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001
   2:54
      PM
                                    To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                    Subject:  RE:

                                    yeah i did, you're gonna love her.

                                    -----Original Message-----
                                    From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                           [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                    Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:25
   PM
                                    To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                    Subject: RE:

                                    you did not

                                        -----Original Message-----
                                       From:   Erin Richardson
               <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                     @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                                    NRON@ENRON.com]

                                       Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001
      2:16
         PM
                                       To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                       Subject:  RE:

                                       no, i got a poodle.  go to hell.
         chihuahuas
            are
                  cool.

                                       -----Original Message-----
                                       From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                              [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                       Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001
   2:05
      PM
                                       To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                       Subject: RE:

                                       did you get a lil' chihuahua?  i
   hate
         those
               things.

                                           -----Original Message-----
                                          From:   Erin Richardson
                  <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                        @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                                       NRON@ENRON.com]

                                          Sent:   Wednesday, October 03,
   2001
         1:59
            PM
                                          To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                          Subject:  RE:

                                          i went during lunch.

                                          -----Original Message-----
                                          From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                                 [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                          Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001
      1:48
         PM
                                          To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                          Subject: RE:

                                          i couldnt see it b/c it was
      surrounded
         by
            a
                  wooden
                        fence.
                           i
                                 know
                                    you
                                          didn't get a dog.  unless you
   took
      one
         of
               your 2
                     hour
                           breaks
                                    before
                                          lunch.

                                              -----Original Message-----
                                             From:   Erin Richardson
                     <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                           @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                                          NRON@ENRON.com]

                                             Sent:   Wednesday, October 03,
      2001
            1:05
               PM
                                             To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                             Subject:

                                             did you go look at that house
      last
            night?
                  did
                     you
                           like
                              it?
                                 i
                                    got
                                       a
                                             dog, it
                                             is precious, you are going to
      love
         it.

   **********************************************************************
                                          This e-mail is the property of
   Enron
         Corp.
                  and/or
                     its
                              relevant
                                       affiliate
                                          and
                                          may contain confidential and
      privileged
               material
                     for
                        the
                              sole
                                 use
                                    of
                                       the
                                          intended recipient (s). Any
   review,
         use,
                     distribution
                        or
                                    disclosure
                                       by
                                          others is strictly prohibited. If
      you
         are
            not
                  the
                           intended
                                    recipient
                                       (or
                                          authorized to receive for the
         recipient),
               please
                        contact
                           the
                                    sender
                                       or
                                          reply
                                          to Enron Corp. at
                           enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
                              and
                                    delete
                                          all
                                          copies of the message. This
   e-mail
      (and
            any
                        attachments
                              hereto)
                                    are
                                       not
                                          intended to be an offer (or an
         acceptance)
               and
                  do
                     not
                           create
                              or
                                       evidence
                                          a
                                          binding and enforceable contract
         between
               Enron
                     Corp.
                        (or
                           any
                              of
                                    its
                                          affiliates) and the intended
      recipient
         or
            any
                  other
                           party,
                              and
                                 may
                                       not
                                          be
                                          relied on by anyone as the basis
   of
      a
               contract
                  by
                           estoppel
                              or
                                       otherwise.
                                          Thank you.

   **********************************************************************