i hope to quit before that becomes an issue.  one can only hope.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garza, Maria
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:07 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Iroquois and Tennesse capacity

don't forget to print out hard copy of email for file

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Van Hooser, Steve; Mann, Kay
Cc:	Boyt, Eric; Concannon, Ruth; Garza, Maria; Barbe, Robin
Subject:	Iroquois and Tennesse capacity

Iroquois is offering to market ENA's capacity for $1.00 (see attachements at the bottom of this email).  Doesn't sound like a bad deal to me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Robin Zaleski" <robin_zaleski@iroquois.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 1:49 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	[Fwd: [Fwd: Enron noms]]

Chris

I checked our tariff and with our in house council and there is nothing that
precludes us from assisting you with marketing this capacity.  In fact, our
tariff provides for it in Section 28.15 of the General Terms & Conditions
(Transporter & Shipper negotiate a "marketing fee" for Transporter to
actively market capacity on behalf of Shipper).  So as not to set a
precedent of doing it for free, I've attached a letter agreement for a token
$1 marketing fee.  What is the protocol (and likelihood) of having something
like this signed?

Once the capacity is offered and a replacement shipper is found, all three
parties would sign a permanent release agreement, a pro forma of which is
also attached.  Basically it outlines who the parties are, what agreements
are in place, and takes all the liability (and right of first refusal) off
of you and puts it on the Replacement Shipper.  Enron has signed a similar
agreement in the past regarding the majority of volumes on the same contract
when it released them to ProGas in 1997.

Please call me to discuss and/or if you need the relevant tariff page faxed
to you.

robin

--

Robin Zaleski
Market Services Coordinator
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
p] 203-925-7274
f] 203-929-9501
e] robin_zaleski@iroquois.com

Robin Zaleski wrote:

> Chris
>
> Since you are not using the smaller contract at all, and it is a true
> Enron contract (as opposed to capacity release), you can release that one
> as well, to anyone.  We may be able to help you find a home for it.  The
> liability right now is about $27,000 a month.
>
> Call me to discuss.
>
> robin
>
> Robin Zaleski wrote:
>
> > Hi Chris
> >
> > Pursuant to our conversation, the last nom activity was:
> >
> > 1250-05 (2,017 Dth/d):
> > "jcollins" zeroed out the nom on 12/04/01 for the 12/05/01 gas day and
> > forward
> >
> > 1250-08 (35,679 Dth/d):
> > "jcollins" zeroed out the nom on 12/04/01 for the 12/05/01 gas day and
> > forward
> >
> > I forgot to give you Ivy's number when we spoke.  Call her at
> > 203-944-7020 and she will walk you through the capacity release process
> > on Iroquois OnLine.
> >
> > take care
> >
> > r
> >
> > --
> >
> > Robin Zaleski
> > Market Services Coordinator
> > Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
> > p] 203-925-7274
> > f] 203-929-9501
> > e] robin_zaleski@iroquois.com

 - Enron_mktg_fee.doc << File: Enron_mktg_fee.doc >>
 - Enron_perm_release.doc << File: Enron_perm_release.doc >>


Moving along and on schedule. I wll be speaking myself twice and be at the
Seattle meeting for about four days negotiating on the side.
---------------------- Forwarded by Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/14/99 04:23 PM ---------------------------

Terence H Thorn
11/14/99 04:21 PM
To: Rob Bradley@ENRON, Joe Hillings@ENRON, Chris Long@ENRON, Edith
Terry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Lay WTO Speech

Rob has provided everyone a new set of slides for Ken's speech. They want Ken
to speak for 20 minutes.  Once we agree on these we have to put together
talking points for Ken to use. I would like to be at that point this
Wednesday so we have the rest of the week to get feed back fro Ken and
finalize the speech next Monday or Tuesday.

Let me try out some themes.

We need to put energy developments in the context of globalization. The
world's economy is integrating as never before as transborder trade
increases, capital becomes more mobile. technology speeds this process. To
compete in this new arena countries must have access to the most talented
labor, the most advanced technology, and the lowest cost, highest quality
suppliers of goods and services. No where is this more critical that in the
areas of energy production, transportation, distribution and use.

Historically, energy trade has focused on technology to explore, produce and
export energy. In the 1990's the focus shifted to using that energy
internally to fuel the tremendous economic growth experienced by developing
economies. The focus became infrastructure development and inter-regional
trade as governments removed the legal and regulatory barriers to private
energy and infrastructure development. With energy demand increasing at high
rates, the potential for price increases, the need to develop and use new
energy technologies and the related environmental problems associated with
economic development, the next focus must be on opening these same economies
to the world class suppliers and partners which have the intellectual
property, talent, networks and technology to provide the answers to the more
efficient  production, transportation and use of energy. By opening their
economies to an expanded trade in energy services, these countries gain
instant  access to the skills and capabilities that have taken decades to
develop elsewhere.

But it's not just governments that benefit. In the US and Europe today we
have seen an explosion of customer choice in their providers of products,
services, prices and terms.   The service industries have led the way in
providing more value at better prices. This will help economies leverage
their own financial, technological and intellectual capabilities.

Having put the need to have energy services on the WTO agenda I would now
turn the problem of defining the energy services sector.  I don't like the
third chart, Energy Services Overview - it's confusing. I don't know if you
are listing the companies involved in services, in the coalition or what. I
far prefer the type of chart Rachel Thompson uses in her environmental
services presentation on page three: Some examples of environmental goods and
services. We can briefly talk about the historic issues here, but also
forward our recommendations on how energy services should be considered in
the WTO GATS discussions. The inclusion in the next GATS round is not an end
in itself but will start a process that will:

 Clarify the definition of energy services
 Identify the barriers to trade in energy services
 Set the goals for the desired level of market openess
 Establish commitments on transparency, due process and regulatory
implementation

From here we do a summary of global trends, the important role energy
services will play in a globalized economy, how expanded trade in energy
services can be a direct channel for technology transfer. This is the
"win-win" section.

In turning to the slides Rob provided,  I have already mentioned my concerns
about the second slide. The list of members of the coalition can stay- it
represents the depth and variety of businesses in this area. The energy and
infrastructure slides fit the initial story. The energy services megatrend
slide has a long way to go. Maybe we can show the trend: production and
export,  private infrastructure development, and the next step: mass
customization. The privatization slide doesn't go here but I'm not sure what
the point is or how we want to tie privatization to energy services. The
globalization slides need to go earlier if we are to use the story I outlined
but the globalization of energy trade slide is about the trade in
commodities.  It doesn't fit- we are after data on the goods and services
that make this trade happen, not the commodity per se.

The customization is fine- we need to have solid talking points about why
customization of energy services helps economies.  This will be a tough
section- I don't think we have anything in the can exactly on this point. Do
we need new markets for competitive energy?   Energy outsourcing and
information age are fine,  I like the nexus between energy and environment.
The talking points here should focus on this part of the energy services
business.  EES should have lots of talking points in this area. The benefits
slide can be expanded. I don't see the need for the fragmentation slide.
Point?

On the conclusions don't be so threatening. Rather than say must adapt, we
should be talking about the benefits of embracing the new energy market.  Add
a point about rising demand, environment problems, the need to produce and
use energy more efficiently.

.


fye   this is not a typo
----- Forwarded by Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 07:34 PM -----

	Scott Josey@ENRON
	10/23/2000 06:14 PM

		 To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wildhorse/Crescendo

Barbara,
I wanted to thank you again for your assistance and insight in the Crescendo
matters.  I particularly appreciate your effort to set up the meeting with
Stan Horton.  The meeting was helpful and it was the right decision to go
forward with the meeting.  By the way, I believe that Gerald is doing a great
job.
Thanks again,
Scott


I had the same problems with this that you all do.  That is why I told
Gossett that if this is something that has to happen, then only people like
Joe Hunter and 1or 2 others should be allowed to change the c/p names ONLY.

Errol

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach @ ECT                           01/22/2001 09:39 AM

To: Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Credit Report

I don't thing that is an option.  If we give you the ability to change names
then you also have the ability to change other parts of the deals.

Dave

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Bianca Ornelas @ ENRON                           01/22/2001 09:30 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report

In order for our credit exposure to be recorded correctly, our group
(Financial Confirmations) would like to be able to change c/p names for all
desks going forward.  One person will be designated to handle all changes and
an email will be sent regarding these changes daily.  Please let me know how
you feel about this?

Thanks for your time,

Bianca


Things are really good.  I am enjoying work b/c I have assumed a lot more
responsibility.  I am looking forward to some vacation time, though.  How are
you doing?

-Eric

Danielle Samson <DanielleS@JonesGranger.com> on 12/14/99 03:45:10 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: FROGAPULT, ELFBOWL, Y2KGAME Virus Hoax

Thanks, I just got this one a second ago.  I don't know which to believe, so
I deleted the files anyway.  How is everything going?


Zimin, Stinson

He seems to be really interested.

We should set up a formal interview for him.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2000
03:04 PM ---------------------------

John Hou
02/08/2000 02:30 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Hou/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject:

Dr . Kaminski,

Thank you for giving me an opportunity to talk with you and Zimin.  It's my
great pleasure to meet  with you
and your group members.

I met Zimin last week. We had a wonderful talk.  After our meeting, I  handed
in him my current resume.
He may already forwarded my resume to you.  If not, I will be very happy to
send you a copy.

By talking with you, Zimin  and by attending your presentation yesterday at
UH,  I find I am really interesting the
fields that you are working on .  I am deeply impressed by the research works
your team have done and I am
looking forward  I am able to become one of your members.  I am also looking
forward  to be able to do researches
under your guidance.

I strongly  feel that your research department  provides the kind of jobs and
environments that I have been looking
for a long time.  My career objective matches your research fields and
directions.  I believe my training in  mathematics
and computer science will provide me some necessary backgrounds in energy
risk management  .  I am also sure that
by working with you,   I can greatly expand my IT skills and experiences.  I
also can learn tremendously from
 you and your research teams.

Currently after finishing my programing work as an IT spcialist,  I am
reading John Hull's book and try to catch up necessary
background in Finance and related fields.  I am also readingyour "Managing
Energy Price Risk" book.
Thank you for giving me a copy of this book.

Again, thank you  for giving me this opportunity and I am looking forward to
working in your team.

John Hou
713-853-1600


Per your request.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000 01:28
PM ---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/18/2000 12:30 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: LM6K Distribution

Kay:

Just to let you know I am supposed to have the copies of the LM6K purchase
agreement today and was planning to distribute them today.  I thought I'd
deliver the Bank's original to Roseann along with a copy.

I'll send her an electronic copy also.