----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 01:01 PM -----

	Candace L Bywaters
	10/23/2000 08:50 AM

		 To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Rose/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Sale of the Point Comfort 12" Pipeline

I sm preparing to open up a bidding activity for the subject Pipeline which
is approximately four miles of 12" pipe under account # 3224.  The nbv is
$18,901.

I have dusted off my list of salvage bidders and under separate cover will
publish these seeking additions or deletions from any of you who care to
contribute.  ;I am assuming that this pipe is not viably operating and would
appreciate any information in this regard if I am incorrect.

As for now, I would like a sample Purchase and Sale Agreement and a
Confidentiality Agreement that I may use with my solicitations.  This would
include some type of alignment sheet depicting the pipe and its legal
description, etc.  You are all seasoned in knowing what level of data I need
at this stage of the offer.

I already have at least one interested party in this and would like to move
forward as soon as possible to get this on the table for bids.  I would
appreciate receiving the necessary materials by October 31, or information of
how I can contribute to this activity.  Also, please let me know if there is
someone else I should copy on this.

Thank you in advance for your assistance in this endeavor.


Most of you have affiliates, subsidiaries or parents who have radio
licenses.? You should be aware of the fact that the FCC has been imposing
significant fines in connection with the unauthorized assignment or transfer
of  control of these licenses.? This often occurs during mergers or
acquisitions, where the existence of the radio licenses is not considered to
be  a major element of the deal.? The attached?memorandum by one of my
partners, Ken Keane in our DC office,?provides a brief update on
developments in this area.? If you have any questions, or want to follow up
on Ken's information, please let me know.
?
Dan
 - Radio Licenses Memo.doc


FYI.  Thanks to Max at the PX
gba

Received: by u1.farm.idt.net for foothi19 (with pop daemon (v1.21 1997/08/10)
Tue Aug 22 23:56:11 2000)
X-From_: Max_S_Bulk@calpx.com Tue Aug 22 14:05:25 2000
Received: from mail-relay3.idt.net (MAIL-RELAY3.IDT.NET [169.132.8.27]) by
u1.farm.idt.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA08399 for <foothi19@idt.net>;
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:05:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Max_S_Bulk@calpx.com
Received: from alhpfw1.wepex.com ([208.129.254.17]) by mail-relay3.idt.net
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e7MI54m24163 for <foothi19@idt.net>; Tue, 22
Aug 2000 14:05:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by alhpfw1.wepex.com; id KAA13156; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:55:16 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from csiapmail1a.calpx.com(208.152.75.2) by alhpfw1 via smap (V4.2)
id xma013144; Tue, 22 Aug 00 10:55:12 -0700
Received: by *.calpx.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))  id
88256943.006389F8 ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:07:13 -0700
X-Lotus-FromDomain: PXNOTES@PX_WEB
To: foothi19@idt.net
cc: philm@scdenergy.com, rjhickock@duke-energy.com,
braun@braunlegal.com,        rpelote@energy.twc.com, nam.nguyen@powersc.com
Message-ID: <88256943.00638938.00@*.calpx.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:03:04 -0700
Subject: Updated PX Congestion Reform Proposal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=cf8KTYNOvoM3UPkuq3oJhrXCKxlJ7rky4vQF78Y8WxWzh7bfOdHbCS9S"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Here is the updated version of the PX proposal.  Please feel free to call me
with any questions / comments.  Of course we can talk tomorrow as well.

Max

Office: 626-537-3202
Call: 626-524-9334

(See attached file: Proposed Congestion Reform Enhancements.doc)

 - Proposed Congestion Reform Enhancements.doc


You have signed the last beam....
 Now  watch it rise.

Enron employees are invited to celebrate the
 Topping-Out of Enron Center South
 this afternoon at Antioch Park
3:45 pm - 4:30 pm.

In celebration of Arbor Day, tree saplings will be
handed out to all participants.

In the event of rain, the Topping-Out Celebration will air on IPTV Wednesday
and
the tree saplings will be distributed in the plaza today at 4:00 pm


I don't see any problem with this transaction since it appears to be limited
to Louisiana assets, but the issue of whether we are impacted by the
noncompete agreement strikes me as a commercial call.  Please let me know if
you have any problem with the transaction and I will pursue it.  Thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/10/2000
11:25 AM ---------------------------

Michael Moran
02/09/2000 01:58 PM
To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: LRC Joint Venture

Please see the attached and let me know if you have any problems so that GPG
can respond to Brian Redmond.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Moran/GPGFIN/Enron on 02/09/2000
01:55 PM ---------------------------

Brian Redmond@ECT
02/09/2000 01:44 PM
To: Sherri Reinartz@ENRON, J Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie J
Harris@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rex
Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles Cheek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Fowler@ENRON,
Al Alexanderson/Enron@Gateway, Rebecca P Mark/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, John
Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mark Frevert/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley A Hudler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen S Owens@ees, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Karas/EWC/Enron@Enron, Adam Umanoff/EWC/Enron@Enron,
Joe Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Stabler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harold Bertram/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: LRC Joint Venture

Please find the attached memo summarizing a proposed joint venture between
Enron North America and Texaco involving our respective intrastate pipeline
assets in Louisiana (i.e., Enron's LRC pipeline).  The joint venture would
restrict Enron and its affiliates from pursuing certain limited business
opportunities involving specified pipeline assets that may be competitive
with the joint venture.  Specifically, these assets include:

(i) the Acadian Gas Pipeline System (currently ultimately owned by Shell
Petroleum Inc. USA),
(ii) the Cypress Gas Pipeline System (currently ultimately owned by Shell
Petroleum Inc. USA),
(iii) the Louisiana Intrastate Gas System (currently ultimately owned by
American Electric Power Co. Inc.),
(iv) the Louisiana Gas System (currently ultimately owned by Conoco Inc.);
and
(v) the Louisiana gas pipeline assets of Koch Gateway Pipeline Co. (currently
ultimately owned by Koch Industries).

In keeping with Enron's internal policies, we are seeking your confirmation
that you have no objection to the non-compete provisions in this
transaction.  Please feel free to call Lance Schuler, Hal Bertram or me if
you have any questions.

Regards,
Brian


Prices in the 28 December 2001 Real-time market and the 29 December 2001
DAM are correct.
The NYISO is reserving HB 6 and 23 at all four external proxy buses
pursuant to ECA-B.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628650Q@lyris.nyiso.com


Found one but only have it for 30 minutes.  EB 2541 3-3:30.
See you then...

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Becker, Lorraine
Sent: Thursday, May  10, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Kyle III, Bill
Subject:

EB2541   3-3:30

Lo

Lorraine Becker
EnronOnline
Marketing
713-853-1680 Office
713-646-2126 Fax
713-899-6501 Cellular
Lorraine.Becker@enron.com


Shelley,

I have a note to you buried in my 'Updates' e-mail I just sent.  It is:

Do you still sign TPA's for NNG?  If not, who signs them now?

Thanks,
Theresa


I just refaxed. Please confirm receipt


christopher walken was the guinea


The attached letter was sent to the House leadership and the Chairman and
Ranking Members of the House Committees on Agriculture, Commerce,  Rules, and
Banking, under Ken Lay's signature.


I added the demand charges but I still need one of my Transco schedulers to
remove the volumes "actualized" on the 9th.

Darla Saucier@ENRON
05/08/2001 09:12 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Oglethorpe invoice for April

Please let me know when you are finished with this.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Darla Saucier/NA/Enron on 05/08/2001
09:11 AM ---------------------------

Jim Homco@ECT
05/04/2001 11:24 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Darla Saucier/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Oglethorpe invoice for April

Mr. Germany - following are my notes per info Darla sent me:
Invoice corrections:
 Purchases on 4/9 should be zero.
 Transport charge is OK =  $11,274.31
 I do not see the demand charge in the invoice...
 Also need to add a credit cashout for 12dt's at cashout price.
I will be back in on Wednesday.

Thanks Darla for sending this - don't let Mr Germany - slack off next week.

Darla Saucier@ENRON
05/04/2001 10:16 AM
To: Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Oglethorpe invoice for April

sorry!

I think I referred someone to you that called me about Ormet.  Sorry!  I got
confused about ormet/oglethorpe.  Bad Morning!

Thanks
Darla


I set up the following new TU deals for May 1

759849	St 30 to Z6 New York
759876	St 45 to Z6 New York
759877	St 65 to Z6 New York
760097 Ragley to Z6 New York

759992 St 45 to St 65


I am faxing a copy of the JayBee agreement.  The correct name is Jay-Bee
Production Company.  He calls it Jay-Bee Oil and Gas during phone
conversations, and that name may have been inadvertantly used.

Jim


Mary,
I want my name and Theresa Brogan's added to the authorized approvers on
manual wires.
Thanks, Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 10:52
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           09/08/2000 10:09 AM

To: Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Dallman/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frieda Schutza/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn Centilli/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Manual Wires

Mary, Larry and Wes,
We just received a faxed copy of the Manual Wire and Same Day Payment memo
which was sent by Betty Tauzier on 8/28/00.
Rate & Currency trades fx which is settled the following day and requires
next day payments for FX.  Currently we are severely hampered because our
infomation is required into Unify by 2:30 for an Accounts Payable run at 4:00
for next day payments.  We are still trading after these cut-offs and tying
out the day's activity with Trading.  Therefore, we currently have to rely on
manual wires to make payments to our counterparties on the value date.

We need to get timeframes which mirror our business requirements.  I would
like to get the Accounts Payable run for our companies, 842 and 967, moved to
after 5:00 pm.  Information is not due to the bank until next day. 8:00 am
London time.

Please let Laurel and me know what changes can be done to our processing
flows.
Thanks. Sheila


(See attached file: HPLN1115.xls)

 - HPLN1115.xls


Which company?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:19 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Call me

Did we reduce interco int rate this year? number seems significantly lower than last year $21.7MM.  We have $23MM interest income shown in long range projections.


Please review and comment on attached sample run.


Chris Long (Enron) and I spent yesterday on Capitol Hill.  We met with House
Agriculture Committee Minority and Majority Staff, Senate Banking Committee
Staff and Senate Agriculture Committee Staff.  The bill clearly is moving and
there is a good chance it will go to the Floor of the House next week.  The
bilateral exemption for physical commodities (non-agricultural commodities)
is accepted and should be secure.  We have problems with the electronic
trading facility exemption for physical commodities.

House

The House Agriculture Committee remains inclined to exclude metals from the
exemption.  We are working with the Commerce Committee (which has not
excluded metals) to change that result.

Senate

We have a much more severe problem in the Senate.  Senate democrats led by
Senator Harkin are very concerned to go against the CFTC in favor of big
energy companies.  They want the CFTC to endorse the exemption.
Unfortunately, as you are aware, the CFTC (recently the Chairman himself)
have been heavily lobbying against the exemption.  We are working with staff
and will keep you posted.

We have prepared talking points and bullets which are still in draft to
distribute to the Hill.  I would appreciate your comments on them and your
thoughts.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Bullets.doc
 - H.R. 4541 Energy Group Talking Points.doc


Please review the attached outage report that pertains to your region. If you have any questions, please give me a call.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923 (Office)
713-646-2584 (Fax)


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dicarlo, Louis
Sent:	Friday, February 15, 2002 2:49 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Shackleton, Sara; Hall, Bob M.; Apollo, Beth; Couch, Greg; Miroballi, Angelo
Cc:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Chilkina, Elena; Garza, Maria; Rostant, Justin; Tian, Yuan
Subject:

Below is our top 30 gas financial ITM terminated counterparties (CP).  We should focus on these CPs first.  If anyone is aware of other CPs which should be included please let me know.

Counterparty				$Million
------------------------------------------------------	------------------
Calpine Energy Services, L.P.		$358.3
Coral Energy Holding, L.P.		$133.4
PMI Trading, LTD			$80.6
Sempra Energy Trading Corp.		$75.8
PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC	$55.3
AIG Energy Trading Inc.			$50.6
Reliant Energy Services, Inc.		$38.4
The New Power Company		$36.8
Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc.		$35.2
WPS Energy Services, Inc.		$32.4
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce	$30.4
FPL Energy Power Marketing, Inc.	$28.6
JPMorgan Chase Bank			$25.8
Arizona Public Service Company		$21.9
FirstEnergy Solutions Corp.		$20.6
BNP Paribas				$20.4
Texaco Inc.				$19.7
MidAmerican Energy Company		$17.4
Vitol Capital Management Ltd.		$17.4
BP Corporation North America Inc.	$17.1
Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc.	$15.0
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation		$14.3
PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.		$14.2
Enbridge Marketing (U.S.) Inc.		$13.7
CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Co $13.1
Royal Bank of Canada, The		$12.5
Tudor Proprietary Trading, L.L.C.		$12.1
e prime, inc.		Terminated	$12.1
American Public Energy Agency		$12.0
Garden State Paper Company, LLC	$11.6

We should begin or continue with the process of contract review and collecting confirmations, A/R, and A/P.

Thank you.

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


Sorry,
Report as of August 24, 2000


For Powerex, see changes on financial.  For physical power, no changes to
prior approval.  See Legal Online Database.


Attached is a draft advice from Mallesons on EnronOnline. Of immediate
concern to us are the form of the various agreements for the road show next
week. Mallesons have suggested some minor attachments. These are in the
annexes to the advice. Following are my comments

Password Agreement  - Fine, seems a good to give address for notices etc.

ETA - I asked Mallesons to consider the wording of the indemnity clause under
Australian law. The major concern is that in Australia special damages has a
near opposite meaning to the US. The suggested amendment to clause 3(c) I
believe we could dispense with. It relates to a concern that an Enron
acceptance may be accessible on the Website Server. However, from what I have
been told this is not a foreseeable eventuality.

GTCs - Minor changes. The only one we are unlikely to incorporate relates to
the  collateral clause. Obviously we are in a position to have different GTCs
for different counterparties

As a next step Paul I will give you copies of the Password Agreement and the
ETA for inclusion in Road Show. I expect to settle the advice early week  and
will circulate it.

---------------------- Forwarded by David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENTon
02/25/2000 05:44 PM ---------------------------

"Farrell, Scott" <Scott.Farrell@msj.com.au> on 02/24/2000 03:52:20 PM
To: "'david.minns@enron.com'" <david.minns@enron.com>
cc: "James, Martin" <Martin.James@msj.com.au>

Subject: EnronOnline

Mallesons Stephen Jaques
Confidential communication

David

Please find attached a further draft of the advice marked up to show the
changes made from the previous draft. <<0437047.DOC>>

In particular please note:

* that we have suggested amendments to the agreements in the schedule
- if these are acceptable for use we will accept the revision mode in the
final version.  If they are not, please let us know.
* as certain negative prices are now possible, it is expected that an
AFMA endorsed amendment to the clause relating to negative prices and market
disruption events will be prepared - this would need to be included in the
GTCs (and your ISDAs)
* it would not seem practical to include the collateral language in
the GTCs only in respect of some clients (as the GTCs are standard
provisions).  Would collateral arrangements in relation to particular
clients using GTCs be best documented separately?
* will offers on EnronOnline be considered by a EAF trader in
Australia before being accepted?
* the trade practices material can be completed whenever it is
convenient for one of our trade practices lawyers to review the working site
as a whole.

Best regards

Scott Farrell
Senior Associate
Mallesons Stephen Jaques Sydney
Direct line (61 2) 9296 2142
Fax (61 2) 9296 3999

 - 0437047.DOC


Mike Triem
NA IPAQ & Displays Business Planning
281.927.8586

-----Original Message-----
From: Stavinoha, Robert
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 9:31 AM
To: Triem, Mike; Valenzuela, John; Karrenbrock, Douglas; McGowen,
Kimberly; Moore, Leslie
Subject: FW: Aggie/Texas Fishing Contest

This is so lame, only you Aggies could love it

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Gage [mailto:fgage@na.ko.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 8:57 AM
To: JBaj@Deepwater.com; Tbruns@wilsononline.com; ggage@usmint.treas.gov;
wgaines@swmail.sw.org; MARK.PEREZ@UDVNA.com; Stavinoha, Robert;
sbdavis@clearsail.net
Subject: Aggie/Texas Fishing Contest

You got to love it!
---------------------- Forwarded by Fred Gage/MM/NA/TCCC on 08/15/2000
09:51 AM ---------------------------

It's that time or year again!!!

Once there was a season when Texas and A & M football teams were not
scheduled to play each other.

It seemed so unusual, that the coaches of both teams got together and
decided that there should be some sort of competition between the 2 teams
because of their great rivalry.

They decided on a week long ice-fishing competition.
The team who caught the most fish at the end of the week would win.

So on a cold northern South Dakota lake (a neutral site so no one would
whine about home field advantage), they began their contest.

The 1st day, after 8 hours of fishing, A&M had caught 100 fish and Texas
had 0.

At the end of the 2nd day, A&M had caught 200 fish and Texas had 0.

That evening the Texas Coach got his team together and said, "I suspect
some kind of cheating is taking place".

The next morning he dressed one of his players in maroon and white and sent
him over to the camp to act as a spy.

At the end of the day, the spy came back to report to the coach.

The coach asked, "Well, how about it, are the Aggies cheating?"

"They sure are", the Texas player reported, "They're cutting holes in the
ice!"


please print
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 09:30 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	08/29/2000 08:13 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Project Raptor III (1 of 2 emails)

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/29/00 08:10 AM -----

	"Curry, Alicia" <acurry@velaw.com>
	08/28/00 01:58 PM

		 To: "Kopper, Michael (Enron)" <michael.kopper@enron.com>, "Tiller, AnnMarie
(Enron)" <annmarie.tiller@enron.com>, "Schnapper, Barry (Enron)"
<barry.schnapper@enron.com>, "St. Clair, Carol (Enron)"
<carol.st.clair@enron.com>, "Sefton, Scott (Enron)" <scott.sefton@enron.com>,
"'kenton@rlf.com'" <kenton@rlf.com>, "'dj@lordspv.com'" <dj@lordspv.com>,
"'aw@lordspv.com'" <aw@lordspv.com>, "'aroberts@wilmingtontrust.com'"
<aroberts@wilmingtontrust.com>, "'martha_stuart@kirkland.com'"
<martha_stuart@kirkland.com>, "Chandler, Trina" <tchandler@velaw.com>,
"'kevin.d.jordan@enron.com'" <kevin.d.jordan@enron.com>, "Astin, Ronald T."
<RAstin@velaw.com>, "Spradling, Mark" <MSpradling@velaw.com>, "Osterberg,
Edward" <eosterberg@velaw.com>, "'Anne Yaeger'" <Anne.Yaeger@enron.com>,
"'Ian Schachter'" <ian.schachter@us.pwcglobal.com>, "'Michael Edsall'"
<michael_edsall@kirkland.com>, "'Brent Vasconcellos'" <bvascon@enron.com>,
"'Trushar Patel'" <trushar.patel@enron.com>, "'rsiurek@enron.com'"
<rsiurek@enron.com>, "'patty.grutzmacher@enron.com'"
<patty.grutzmacher@enron.com>, "'jennifer.stevenson@enron.com'"
<jennifer.stevenson@enron.com>, "'simpson@rlf.com'" <simpson@rlf.com>
		 cc: "Halbert, Elaine" <ehalbert@velaw.com>
		 Subject: Project Raptor III (1 of 2 emails)

Attached please find drafts of the following documents:

1. Master Derivatives Agreement

2. Roadrunner/Bobcat ISDA Master Agreement

3. Enron/Bobcat ISDA Master Agreement

4. Put Option Confirmation

5. Stock Purchase Agreement

6. Bobcat Revolving Promissory Note

7. Roadrunner Promissory Note

8. Enron Corp. Guaranty in favor of Bobcat

9. Enron Corp. Guaranty in favor of LJM2-Bobcat, LLC

10. Registration Rights Agreement

> Alicia L. Curry
> Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
> 2300 First City Tower
> 1001 Fannin Street
> Houston, Texas 77002-6760
> Phone:  713-758-4428
> Fax:  713-615-5688
> (Licensed in New York only)
>
>
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.
> This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or
> organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an
> authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and
> its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
> immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email
> from your system. Thank You
>
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:
Contains attorney-client communications and/or attorney work product.

 - Two.DOC
 - Four.DOC
 - Six.DOC
 - Eight.DOC
 - Ten.DOC
 - Nine.DOC
 - Seven.DOC
 - Five.DOC
 - Three.DOC
 - One.DOC


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

Thank you for your order.

You sold 80 shares of BRCD (Brocade Communications Sys I Com) at 222.750000.

ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: B-300-AAYS-9659
Order entered at:                      09:03:36 on 11/09/00
Order processing began at:             09:03:36
Order executed at:                     09:03:36 on 11/09/00

ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 09:03:37 on 11/09/00
Your position in BRCD is 0 shares
Your real cash total is $15,491.33

You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.

Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number.


FYI.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
04:01 PM ---------------------------

Borislav Feschiev@ENRON
01/12/2001 03:37 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: .. meeting !

Mr. Shankman,

I want to meet you to discuss ideas about Global LNG and a product that I
have developed.
Please let me know a time when we can meet!

Thank you,

Boris Feschiev


Forward Reg Dickson's resume to Ted Bland for consideration for the trading
track program.  He is overqualified and I'm sure too expensive to fill the
scheduling position I have available.  I will work with Cournie Parker to
evaluate the other resumes.

Phillip


Marguerite:

In an effort to finalize the documents that will need to be executed at
closing, I have taken the liberty of drafting two written consents: one of
the Members of Montana Megawatts I, LLC electing NorthWestern Generation I,
LLC as the sole Manager, and the other of the sole Manager of the LLC
replacing the officers and approving the loans from ENA and NorthWestern
Generation I, LLC.  Let me know if you have any comments to the drafts.
Apart from these consents, we will need to coordinate to draft a joint
instruction letter to Citibank.

Regards,

Marisa

 <<2XRN03!.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2XRN03!.DOC


We are proposing the following changes to the calculation of NG correlations:

1. weight the data set (3 calendar months) used in calculating correlations
(most recent data weighed heavier)
2. use respective contract prices, instead of prompt month prices (i.e. for
Nov-00 correlations use Nov contract prices for the last 3 months, as opposed
to prompt month prices for the last three months.

Tanya,

I have confirmed with Ted and he gave us green light to make both changes.
Did we get an opinion from Vince?

Winston,

It is my understanding, that this changes apply to NG correlations only, not
the correlations between commodities. We will test the changes in gas and
then decide on world-wide implementation. Any estimate on timing of this
implementation?

Cassandra,

Ted suggested that you and Veronica should document this as a change in VaR
parameters and inform all commercial desk heads of these changes. We intend
to make them for NA gas first, but ultimately make these changes consistent
across all commodity groups. Let me know if you have questions.

Thanks, Vlady.

Wenyao Jia
10/13/2000 03:43 PM
To: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jin Yu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: VAR calibration issues

Vlady,

Also in the meeting, we identified that there are still some issures
regarding to the correlation matrix calculations.

Since different commodity has different expiration dates.  When calculate
correlation between two commodities, the two may have different prompt
months.  Are we going to use prices on two different prompt months OR are we
going to use the prices on the SAME month disregarding prompt months.

Because above issues, Jin is not going do any changes on the correlation
matrix calculation until above issures can be solved.

Thanks!

Winston

Tanya Tamarchenko
10/13/2000 03:16 PM
To: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wenyao Jia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jin Yu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jin Yu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: VAR calibration issues

Vlady, we met with Winston and Jin today regarding VAR calibration issues.

The outcome on this discussion is:
1. Jin will put weights into calculation of factor loadings;
2. Jin will change the way factor loading are calculated. For each commodity
the prompt month contract will be selected for the effective date of vatrfacs
run.
Then the historical prices will be collected for 3 month for all forward
contracts starting from
selected prompt month contract. The variance-covariance matrix will be
calculated
based on these data, it will be converted into correlation matrix, then
factor loadings
analysis will be performed on the correlation matrix.

Tanya.


Dear HAN Members:

Don't forget that the HAN (Houston Angel Network) meeting will be held this Wednesday, July 18th, at the Houstonian.  Check-in begins at 7:00 a.m. and the breakfast/meeting will be held from 7:30-9:00 a.m.  Come and learn about HAN milestones met and future direction for the group.

Price to attend is $45 payable in advance by check or credit card.  Please R.S.V.P. to Kathy Nethercutt: knethercutt@houstontech.org or call (713) 658-1750, by no later than 4:00 p.m., Tuesday, July 17.

Thanks,
Glenn Dubin

Thank you for your interest in the Houston Technology Center

Kathy B. Nethercutt
Houston Technology Center
1200 Smith, Suite 2940
Houston, TX 77002
Ph: 713.658.1750
Fx: 713.658.1744
www.houstontech.org
knethercutt@houstontech.org


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kenneth G Gruhl" <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kenneth+20G+20Gruhl+22+20+3Ckggruhl+40duke-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Sunday, September 16, 2001 7:39 PM
To:	Mulligan, Amy; Allen K Nielsen; blreese@duke-energy.com; Beck Mayberry; wralkema@pplmt.com; Christopher S Smart; dacluff@duke-energy.com; dlsmith@pplweb.com; dtedesco@duke-energy.com; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Darren Stephens; David Bowers; David P Pell; George X Ouzounian; jjbischoff@pplweb.com; jmtaggart@duke-energy.com; jpritchard@citlink.net; James Stebbins; kglenny@duke-energy.com; Kim White; mschneider@duke-energy.com; Michael Kerr; Michael Wells; rjnewson@duke-energy.com; rspear@pplmt.com; Sherry Davis; Steven Fliflet; Steven Fliflet; Ted Romo; Todd Hendricks; Tom Carlson; Tyler J Kristensen; ajreiter@duke-energy.com; kggruhl@duke-energy.com; pattersondw@bv.com; swansondj@bv.com; trading@pplmt.com
Subject:	Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Monday Sept 17, HE 8:00 to Sept. 18, HE 7:00

Notes:
1) On Sunday the startup team changed their plans and did 2 ST Trip Tests
instead of tuning Duct Burners as planned.
2) Will do Duct Burner Tuning on Monday.  Expect MW swings.
3)  MW outputs are average values only in order to schedule overall gas
nomination for the 24 hour period.
4) Actual MW must be handled in real time.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic00041.pcx)
 - pic00041.pcx


Tana:

Stupid request but it's important to this CP -- please sent John Nugent a
revised form of NDA with  Enron Net Works LLC as the only Enron entity
(delete both ENA and EOL).  Then, I hope that he will review it.

Thanks,

Leslie

	Tana Jones
	11/15/2000 05:19 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NDA-Purchase Pooling, Inc.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 05:19 PM -----

	Paul Finken@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	11/15/2000 05:00 PM

		 To: jnugent@purchasepooling.com
		 cc: kihansen@cisco.com, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kara Knop/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Dovie Keprta/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject: NDA-Purchase Pooling, Inc.

John - The legal department informed me that the Enron NDA would be mutually
binding and if we worked from your Purchase Pooling NDA that it would take a
few days before they could review the document.  Is it possible to work from
the Enron NDA or do you or your attorneys have specific questions?

pf
----- Forwarded by Paul Finken/Enron Communications on 11/15/00 04:52 PM -----

	Tana Jones@ECT
	11/10/00 02:13 PM

		 To: jnugent@purchasepooling.com
		 cc: Dovie Keprta/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Paul
Finken/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: NDA-Purchase Pooling, Inc.

At the request of Paul Finken, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If the enclosed meets with your approval, please
mail or fax an executed copy to me.  If you have any comments or questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399.  My fax number is (713)
636-3490.


John,

I noticed a different file name on this draft than the version Pete Thompson
sent out.  How is this version different from Pete's?  I sure hate to have
more than one version of this monster being vetted at the same time.

Thanks,

kay


Mark - I'm so sorry I haven't responded yet, but yes, I did get your e-mail.
I actually solved most of the issues detailed on the spreadsheet, but wanted
to finish before I sent the document back. I've attached the spreadsheet with
what I've done so far, and I'm forwarding most of the remaining deals to Bill
Williams in Real Time. The two deals with volume discrepancies are going to
take some looking into - I think they're in the system correctly and it's
probably just an error in my spreadsheet - but I'll let you know. Again,
sorry for the delay.

Thanks,
Kate

Mark Confer
04/17/2001 05:50 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Hello Kate

Kate did you receive my e-mail from the weekend for EES April activity?   I
know you may not had time to look at them, I just want to make sure the
e-mail got to you since it was the weekend when I forwarded it to you.

Thanks,

Mark


Oneok recap for October

  Joe    3-0518


Melba,

Could you see to this please?  Thanks,

Fletch

---------------------- Forwarded by Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000
09:02 AM ---------------------------

John J Lavorato@ENRON
09/07/2000 07:21 AM
To: Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New product update

Fletch

Make sure they also set up the fixed price vs. daily term swaps at Henry the
Hub.


Jim,

The total market pulp purchased is 180,209,000 tonnes a year.

                                                     Purchased Pulp(tonnes)            % of total purchased Pulp
        Procter & Gamble                          1,480,075                                      0.821%
        Kimberly Clark                               1,209,265                                      0.671%
       Stora Enso                                        119,595                                       0.54%
        Appleton                                         376,921                                       0.209%

These are 1999 data and are taken from International Fact and price book and the Jacobbs & Serrine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bryja, James
Sent:	Saturday, July 28, 2001 3:06 PM
To:	Causholli, Monika
Subject:	RE: Consumption of pulp by company

Monika,

Thanks.  But actually, I am looking for the % of pulp these companies purchase as % of total market pulp purchased worldwide.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Causholli, Monika
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 5:51 PM
To:	Bryja, James
Subject:	Consumption of pulp by company

Jim,

Lecta group is a privately held company and I was unable to find sources of info that would report on their pulp consumption. If you know of any source let me know.

Below you will find the consumption rates for the rest of the companies

                                                         Purchased Pulp(tonnes)            % of purchased Pulp
        Procter & Gamble                          1,480,075                                      100%
        Kimberly Clark                               1,209,265                                      81%
       Stora Enso                                        74,177                                       17%
        Appleton                                         376,921                                       72%

Monika
      [Mark Hall]  e


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/26/2001 01:04 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/26/2001 12:45 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: UC Economists (and others) Step Out a Bit in California

One of the things that came out of the meeting I was at on Saturday with the
UC economists (including Tyson and Yellen) was a "manifesto" that they
published today (I'll have the final to distribute soon).  They're having a
press conference in about 10 minutes at Berkeley.  In anticipation, they're
quoted in a story in today's LA Times (that features Greenspan's comments)
and they focus their quotes on the need to raise rates.  Most of these folks
in the group, lamentably, earn their living by consulting for incumbents, but
there message here should be helpful, and there are a few "right-minded"
economists in the bunch.  (I managed to get Dr. Michaels in the group, who
was a great voice of reason in the debate over what to say in the manifesto.)
 It wasn't appropriate for me to play a visible role in the design of the
manifesto, though I attempted to offer some behind the scenes suggestions.

Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/26/2001 12:41 PM -----

	"James L. Sweeney" <jim.sweeney@stanford.edu>
	01/26/2001 11:52 AM

		 To: Pablo Spiller <spiller@haas.berkeley.edu>, John_Chandley@LECG.com, David
Teece <teece@haas.berkeley.edu>
		 cc: tyson@haas.berkeley.edu, tom_campbell@law.stanford.edu,
shmuel@euler.berkeley.edu, willrichm@aol.com, george_barker@LECG.com,
cdanner@wilkandassociates.com, gilbert@econ.berkeley.edu,
yellen@haas.berkeley.edu, scott_harvey@LECG.com,
jscadding@wilkandassociates.com, mwilk@wilkandassociates.com,
phillip_mcleod@LECG.com, berk@haas.berkeley.edu, john_chandley@LECG.com,
jdasovic@enron.com, lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu, william_hogan@harvard.edu,
rmichaels@fullerton.edu, borenste@haas.berkeley.edu,
richard.rumelt@anderson.ucla.edu, rschmidt@LECG.com,
pverleger@compuserve.com, pjoskow@mit.edu, joseph.mullinix@ucop.edu,
mcfadden@econ.berkeley.edu, steven@stoft.com, peter.gosselin@latimes.com
		 Subject: Re: FINAL VERSION

It seems this is already getting press.  Click on the following to see the
Los Angeles Times story.  Fortunately the LA Times did not focus on any of
the issues we are debating here.

http://www.latimes.com/business/reports/power/

Jim Sweeney

At 04:19 AM 1/26/2001, Pablo Spiller wrote:
>colleagues:
>
>we are less than 2 hrs short of the press conference.  i just got to the
>computer and saw all these e-mails. i will suggest we take our local nobel
>prize winner's suggestion and go, for the time being, as is.  we simply do
>not have the time to incorporate changes without violating the need for
>consensus.  We will release the manifesto at 11am PST, at the press
>conference that is going to take place here at haas.  Those of you from the
>east coast, feel free to release it at any time.  Those in the west coast,
>i would suggest that we do not release it until 11am, but feel free to talk
>to whoever you want about it.
>
>The version of the manifesto that is going to be released is the version
>that we sent yesterday afternoon incorporating the excellent comments by
>paul.  also is the version that includes the list of endorsees as of the
time.
>
>if you haven't received the copy, please let me know.
>
>thanks.
>
>pablo
>
>
>
>At 11:54 AM 1/26/01 -0500, John_Chandley@LECG.com wrote:
> >
> >1.  Is the document out?  Or are we still making changes?
> >
> >2.  Is the "embargo" over?
> >
> >3.  When can we get the final, final, final for further distribution?
> >
> >John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >David Teece <teece@Haas.Berkeley.EDU> on 01/25/2001 05:54:00 PM
> >
> >To:   tyson@haas.berkeley.edu, tom_campbell@law.stanford.edu,
> >      shmuel@euler.berkeley.edu, willrichm@aol.com, george_barker@lecg.com,
> >      cdanner@wilkandassociates.com, gilbert@econ.berkeley.edu,
> >      yellen@haas.berkeley.edu, scott_harvey@lecg.com,
> >      jscadding@wilkandassociates.com, spiller@haas.berkeley.edu,
> >      mwilk@wilkandassociates.com, phillip_mcleod@lecg.com,
> >      berk@haas.berkeley.edu, john_chandley@lecg.com, jdasovic@enron.com,
> >      lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu, william_hogan@harvard.edu,
> >      rmichaels@fullerton.edu, borenste@haas.berkeley.edu,
> >      richard.rumelt@anderson.ucla.edu, rschmidt@lecg.com,
> >      pverleger@compuserve.com, pjoskow@mit.edu, jim.sweeney@stanford.edu,
> >      joseph.mullinix@ucop.edu, mcfadden@econ.berkeley.edu,
> >      steven@stoft.com, jim.sweeney@stanford.edu
> >cc:   peter.gosselin@latimes.com
> >
> >Subject:  FINAL VERSION
> >
> >
> >Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >Here is the FINAL version of the manifesto.  This version includes some
> >additions and deletions to bring on Paul Joskow and Janet Yellen, and
> >hopefully Severin Borenstein as well.  Also attached is a list of
> >endorsements Pablo and I have secured.  If you are not on the list and wish
> >to be added, please let us know.
> >
> >Critically, let us know if you wish to be removed.  We are picking up new
> >endorse by the hour and will release by 9:00 am (PST) tomorrow.
> >
> >
> >David Teece and Pablo Spiller
> >
> >
> >(See attached file: Manifesto DJT 1-25-01.doc)
> >(See attached file: endorsee list 12501.doc)
> >======================================
> >David J. Teece, Director
> >Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization
> >F402 Haas School of Business #1930
> >University of California, Berkeley
> >Berkeley, CA  94720-1930
> >Phone:  (510) 642-1075
> >Fax:  (510) 642-2826
> >http://haas.berkeley.edu/~imio
> >======================================
> >
> >
> >
> >

James L. Sweeney, Stanford University
Department of Management Science and Engineering
Terman Engineering Center, Room 323   Stanford, CA 94305-4026
Voice:  650-723-2847;  Fax: 650-723-1614;   Home Voice or Fax:  650-322-9835


The attached press release was issued by Sepracor at 6:00 a.m.  today.

(See attached file: Sepracor Release.doc)

 - Sepracor Release.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000 04:49 PM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
04/25/2000 04:40 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Kellogg Company

Tana

Please add Wendi LeBrocq to the distribution.  I need to introduce our new
employee to legal. She will help support margining, management reporting etc

Thanks
Molly

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           04/19/2000 04:29 PM

To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon
Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Radous/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Yolanda Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elliot Bonner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Kellogg Company

We have received the following executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:   ISDA Master Agreement ( Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:  March 31, 2000

Enron Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:  Kellogg Company

Transactions Covered: Approved for all products with the exception of:
Weather and foreign exchange


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 04:42 PM
---------------------------

Susan M Scott
11/29/2000 04:28 PM
To: cscott_korea@yahoo.com, tdkelley@ev1.net, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, celeahy@hotmail.com, d.epperson@mail.utexas.edu,
Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, ehillegeist@hotmail.com, jkbowles@hotmail.com,
emily.boon@msdw.com
cc:
Subject: Priceless!

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 04:25
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mason Hamlin                           11/29/2000 04:18 PM

To: Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Piotrowski/NA/Enron@Enron, John
House/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Zachary McCarroll/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Priceless!

 - Priceless.jpg


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	meet w/ Sally

Date:		10/27/2000
Time:		9:00 AM - 9:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Edmund/Shona

I thought either or both of you would be best placed to assist Bob Bruce with
this request.

 Would you be kind enough to see what documents we have which may throw some
light on MG's licensed status.
As to whether any licensing/registration/disclosure requirements may apply
"upward" to any Enron entity, Edmund do you know whether the MG parent
company was so obligated?

Regards,

Marcus

---------------------- Forwarded by Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron on 08/14/2000
04:33 PM ---------------------------
From: Robert Bruce on 08/14/2000 11:55 AM
Sent by: Robert Bruce
To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: MG London, Inc.

Marcus: per our discussion -- any direction would be appreciated -- thanks,
Bob
----- Forwarded by Robert Bruce/NA/Enron on 08/14/2000 11:54 AM -----

	Robert Bruce
	Sent by: Robert Bruce
	08/11/2000 06:02 PM

		 To: justin.boyd@enron.com; jbarrett@mgltd.com
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: MG London, Inc.

Hello, Justin and Jon, this is Bob Bruce with the Enron North America legal
department in Houston.  Sara and I were wondering about a few things; perhaps
David Gilberg or someone else is already addressing these issues --

(1) Given MG London's status as a licensed FCM and CTA, did Enron's
acquisition of MG require any CFTC filing?  If so, Sara and I would like to
get a copy of the filing.

(2) Sara and I were also curious as to whether, or to what extent, CFTC
licensing/registration/disclosure requirements may apply "upward" to any
Enron entities or their officers.

Please let us know if you can shed any light on these areas, or if there is
someone else we should be checking with on these matters.  Thanks -- Bob


Great--am forwarding to Dave for his thoughts.  I'll talk to you when I get
back. Marhta--pls print.  DF

Tony Pryor
09/12/2000 05:23 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Meeting re Risk Management Policy

Drew, attached are my notes from our meeting today. The AA people provided a
list of questions for us to review and asked us to get back with them on the
questions. We agreed get back with them in two weeks. Also, Dan and Bob want
to pow wow on the questions and the policy early next week. It appeared to
Bob and me that to achieve AA's recommended objective of broadening and
generalizing the policy along the lines of the Enron Corp policy, the best
course of action would be to junk the existing one and start from scratch. I
think you and I have previously agreed that the policy is too narrow. I have
volunteered to create a new draft policy.

I am also attaching the existing draft policy with my comments.


USCAA Track & Field Championships, June 9, 2001
The Enron Running Club is seeking runners, sprinters, discus & shot put
throwers, and high jumpers & long jumpers to compete in the annual USCAA
Track & Field Championships on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.
Participate in co-ed track relays & field events of all ages and abilities;
showcase your energy and talents in a challenging, competitive, and fun
environment; participate in an Enron tradition since 1994; experience
teambuilding and camaraderie like never before!  For more information or to
sign up, contact Cindy Richardson at x3-4770 or sprint to:
http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html

Heights Fun Run 5K
Join the Enron Running Club at the Heights Fun Run 5K benefiting The Houston
Heights Association,s Community Projects scheduled for Saturday, June 2nd.
If you,re interested in running or volunteering your time, please contact
Cindy Richardson at 713-853-4770 or Kelly Lombardi at 713-345-5841.  For more
information, run to: http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html.

Dad,s Day 5K
Join the Enron Running Club at the Dad,s Day 5K and 1 Mile Family Walk
benefiting The Prostate Cancer Research and Awareness scheduled for Saturday,
June 2nd.  If you,re interested in running or volunteering your time, please
contact Cindy Richardson at 713-853-4770 or Kelly Lombardi at 713-345-5841.
For more information, run to: http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html.

Stop by for some Texan BBQ, fresh air and Entertainment at Antioch Park

The Assist The Officer Foundation (ATO), a non-profit organization working
independently,  is inviting all Enron employees to come by Antioch Park  on
Friday, June 1st from 11am - 1pm and enjoy a delicious plate of BBQ for only
$5.  Come and listen to the tunes of KRBE with Gabe, their mobile DJ, and
raffles with many prizes will be given away.  Raffle tickets will be $2 each
or 3 for $5.  ATO is dedicated to assisting Houston peace officers injured or
disabled in the line of duty.  Please come out and support your local law
enforcement professionals.

The Caladium plants that are in the huge plant pots throughout the Plaza are
going to be replaced and will be available for purchasing on Monday, June 4th
for $4.00 in the Plaza by the up escalator from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m..

Join us in Dublin or Honolulu ----Joints in Motion is a marathon training
program for walkers and runners that is aligned with a fundraising effort for
the Arthritis Foundation.  The Dublin Marathon will be held Oct. 29 and the
Honolulu marathon will be December 9.  Please call for more information at
713-529-0800.

Volunteer for the Boys & Girls Club Summer Camp Weekends!!!
Kevin Hannon, Boys & Girls Club board member, invites you to join Enron
employee John Cote at a Boys & Girls Club summer camp who is looking for
commitment from a FEW GOOD ENRON MEN AND WOMEN:

WHAT:   2nd Annual Houston Boys and Girls Club / Enron Summer Camp Weekend (2
camps)

WHEN:   Boys Camp
  Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), June 22 through Sunday afternoon, June 24
  --OR--
  Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 20 through Sunday afternoon, July 22

  Girls Camp
  Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 6 through Sunday afternoon, July 8
  --OR--
  Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 13 through Sunday afternoon, July 15

WHERE: Willis, TX (75 minutes from downtown Houston -- just north of Conroe)

WHO:   6-8 counselors per camp to chaperone 75 boys (ages 7-16)

HOW:   Share all sports activities, including canoeing, hiking, fishing,
organizing a talent    show/bonfire/ghost stories, obstacle course, water
balloon fights, softball, basketball,   archery, football, etc.  (Cooking and
clean-up covered by the Houston Boys Club staff.)

CONTACT: John A. Cote at ext. 33830

SPREAD THE WORD.  SPOUSES & OFFICE COLLEAGUES WELCOME.
LAST YEAR'S CAMP WAS A HUGE SUCCESS!

Volunteers Needed for Bring Your Child to Work Day!

Bring Your Child to Work Day is Friday, June 29

Please email Jennifer Milligan if you are interested in volunteering and
indicate your preference in the below activities:

Registration Table
Houston Police Dept / Stranger Danger / Fingerprinting
Outdoor Activities (SPCA pets, Balloon King, kids crafts, etc.)
Business Etiquette class
Business Art (kids' resumes, etc)
Lunch ticket sales/coordination (in Antioch Park)

The Enron Running Club and the Houston Corporate Athletic Association are
seeking volunteers to assist at the annual USCAA Track & Field Championships
on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.  There are many volunteer
opportunities requiring little or no experience including timers, scoring,
lane judges, cheering on athletes and more!  We are looking for employees,
families and friends that can contribute a few hours or who are willing to
spend the day benefiting a great cause.  If you are interested or would like
more information, please contact Kelly Lombardi at x3-8491.

Many volunteers are needed to help with the planned activities for the Enron
Children on June 29th.  If you're interested, send your name and phone
extension to workperks.enron.com.

Support KidSave and Help Miracles Happen. Every Summer.

Kidsave,s  Summer Miracles Program enables orphaned children ages 5 to 11 to
travel to the  US and Canada, live with families and attend day camp. The
program gives  families who may be concerned about the problems of adopting
an older child a chance to meet, get to know and in the best-case scenario,
fall in love with a  child. The program gives prospective parents an
opportunity to see and evaluate  first-hand the challenges and rewards of
adopting an older  child.

In 1999 and  2000 Kidsave and adoption agency partners placed 432 children -
96 percent of  children who participated in the program. Generally, 85 to 90
percent of  children who participate in the program find homes easily through
the program.  The remaining 10 to 15 percent require more work.

Kidsave  believes every child deserves a family. We are committed to placing
all children  who participate in the Summer Miracles Program in permanent
families or  family-like environments.

We are looking  for families to host children, and for others who want to
help us make the camp  program happen for these 250 children.   As a
non-profit organization, Kidsave depends on donations to raise the  money to
bring these children here and find them families.  Please call Tonya Hoppe at
281.286.8948  or tonya@tonya.cc to get involved in Houston,s  Kidsave
program.

Find Out how to Join The Downtown Club May 29 & 30!
The Downtown Club (formerly The Met-Business & Sports Club)Membership
representatives from The Downtown Club will be in the Enron Plaza
Tuesday-Wednesday, May 29-30, from 11 am - 1 pm to discuss membership, the
new "Signature Gold" program (see attached file for more information), and a
new membership referral program.  Don't miss out on this opportunity to join
the Downtown Club or to upgrade your current membership.  As a reminder, a
$200 initiation fee is required for new memberships.   For more information,
contact The Downtown Club Membership Services department at 713-652-0700 or
Georgia Fogo, ext. 3-5609.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/siggoldcourses.pdf

Enron and Kidventure Camps are proud to bring you Camp Enron Summer 2001.
Celebrating our third year, Camp Enron  will once again be providing summer
camp for children, ages 5-13, of Enron employees and contractors.

This year, camp will be May 29-August 10.  Ten, one-week sessions will be
available and families may choose to attend any or all sessions.  Each camp
week is Monday through Friday.

The cost is $150 per week and includes all transportation, field trips and
activities.  A deposit of $50 per week is all that is needed to reserve your
sessions.   The deadline to register is Monday, May 21.

To register, log on to: http://www.kidventurecamp.com/camp_enron.htm.
Spaces are limited.

Enron parents simply ride to work with  their children and check them in to
the Energizer in the morning with the Camp Enron Team.  Enron Campers are
loaded on Coach USA Buses and transported to our nearby camp. At the end of
the day campers are brought back to the Energizer for parents to check out.

It's that easy!

For more information please contact:

web site: www.kidventurecamp.com
call Kidventure: 713.960.8989
e-mail: camps@kidventurecamp.com

Have News to Share?
To post news or events in Enron In Action, please e-mail your information to
EIA@enron.com
no later than 12:00 noon the Thursday prior to the next Monday,s mailing.


Dear Vince:

 I have now spent 16 hours on the valuation project and wanted to touch
base with you to make sure that the basic approach makes sense and that you
think we are making an appropriate amount of progress.  My invoice is
attached.

 By the way, John Martin just mentioned that you have agreed to be our
luncheon speaker at the Texas Finance Festival.  I really appreciate your
help on this and would like to schedule some time next week to talk about
it in more detail.

 I look forward to hearing from you.

regards,

Sheridan
 - Invoice for February and March 2001.doc

Sheridan Titman
Department of Finance
College of Business Administration
University of Texas
Austin, Texas 78712-1179

512-232-2787 (phone)
512-471-5073 (fax)

titman@mail.utexas.edu


Yes


If we cut the people in red - HR would have you at 56 people - what is right?

AMy - please find the difference

-----Original Message-----
From: Rub, Jenny
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise; Schoppe, Tammie
Cc: Webb, Jay
Subject: Data Request

Louise,  I worked with the team this morning and developed the following.  Please call me at 281-463-4421 or 713-851-5456 if you would like to discuss.   JR

Current Employee Count:   62 (includes 4 people in Calgary)

First Cut:   4 people
Revised Employee Count:   58

Names/Impact
John Oh -- Fewer people to support in Portland, so less IT support staff needed
Greg Hibbert -- Fewer people to support in Calgary, so less IT support staff needed
Yvonne Francios -- Outsource video conferencing support (No cost reduction)
Randy Buckman -- No executive support;  executives will have receive trader level support

Second Cut:   4 people
Revised Employee Count:  54

Shari Daugherty -- Reduced service level in security adminitration and no backup
Janet Devereaux -- Outsource phone switch support/backup to Avaya (cost increase)
Roberto DeLeon -- Rely on UBS for security investigations and policy
Faheem Qavi -- Rely on UBS for security investigations and policy

Third Cut:    5 people
Revised Employee Count:  49

Jenny Rub, Bob McAuliffe, Keith Dziadek, Chris Behney, Bruce Smith --  Reduced management structure, rely on UBS for software and vendor management.  Organizational management for the following functions would be moved to somewhere else in the IT organization:  command center, change managment, batch scheduling, server and storage, networking

Fourth Cut:   2 people
Revised Employee Count:  47

Gary Bode, Trey Rhodes  -- Rely on UBS' corporate email services;  no staff or operations available in Houston

Fifth Cut:     2 people
Revised Employee Count:   45

Troy Beyer, Ryan Brennan -- No source code management and batch scheduling software support;  Developers would become responsible for the management of these functions.


Joe,

The list has been updated, and you have been added.

If you need any help, please do not hesitate to ask.

Regards,

Jennifer Ross
Client Services
PIRA Energy Group
3 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Phone-212-686-6808
Fax-  212-686-6628
JRoss@pira.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Jennifer Ross
Subject: RE: PIRA Users

Jennifer, if Randy has updated the user list. I would like to set up a login
and password.
Let me know.
Thanks,
Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Ross [mailto:jross@pira.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: PIRA Users

I am so sorry, I sent the first e-mail without it, & then just sent it to
Randall..

Here it is!

Jennifer Ross
Client Services
PIRA Energy Group
3 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Phone-212-686-6808
Fax-  212-686-6628
JRoss@pira.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Jennifer Ross
Subject: RE: PIRA Users

Jennifer, I did not get the attachment, did you mean to forward it to me?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Ross [mailto:jross@pira.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:57 AM
To: randall.curry@bhlp.com
Cc: Parks, Joe
Subject: PIRA Users

Randall,

Attached is a Company Usage Report, so you can view who has online access to
what.  If you care to make an additional changes please email me and I will
do so.

Thanks,

Jennifer Ross
Client Services
PIRA Energy Group
3 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Phone-212-686-6808
Fax-  212-686-6628
JRoss@pira.com

************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant
affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and
do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between
Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the
basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************

************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant
affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and
do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between
Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the
basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************


Steve Kean and I believe quite strongly, within a four peer group structure,  that we need to allocate somewhere between 30 and 50 percent of Gov't./ public  Affairs out of commercial support into specialized technical- there is a clear divide between individuals in the Gov't/public  Affairs groups  who are managing significant risk for the company and having a significant and  direct impact on commercial activities/ net income( these individuals should be moved to specialized technical)....and others who are performing a less strategic function( who should remain in the commercial support category). With that said, it is probably not necessary to undertake this effort for  mid-year PRC purposes since we are probably moving to a three peer stucture where that split could be achieved (for year-end purposes where the compensation impact would be felt). If we stay with the four group stucture, I intend to push hard for the remapping of Gov't Affairs by year-end.
    On a completely seperate issue, I continue to be  very concerned about the impact of the "preferred" distribution  relative to the bottom category for " commercial support" groups(I'm not implying this is'nt an issue for commercial groups- I just don't have the same ability to assess the impact there)....the concern, simply stated,  is that  it may be entirely  counterproductive to force individuals who are not performance problems  into a category that has significant implications for their careers here at Enron, particularly after going thru the past year where many of the non-performers in my group and others  were moved out of the company- the replacement costs for moving good performers out of the company for the sake of a "preferred" distribution are quite high...and that is even before you begin  to assess the incalcuable damage to morale that will invariably occour.
       Thanks.

	Enron Energy Services  From:  David W Delainey @ EES                           05/10/2001 10:26 AM

Sent by:	Kay Chapman@EES
To:	David W Delainey/HOU/EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/Enron@EnronXGate, Wes Colwell/Enron@EnronXGate, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Kopper/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, James Derrick/Corp/Enron, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, David Oxley/HOU/ECT, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert W Jones/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Joyce/Enron@EnronXGate, Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron, Elspeth Inglis/Corp/Enron

Subject:	PEER GROUP MAPPING

Following my note last week please find attached the consolidated peer group mapping for all business units. This mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

We were considering moving to a 3 Peer Group Structure however it as agreed at the last PRC Committee Meeting  to stay with the current structure since the data had been cleaned and everyone felt generally comfortable where most activities had been placed with the exception of just  2 or 3. It was agreed that we should concentrate on resolving these rather than undertaking an organization wide remapping excercise to consolidate to 3 Peer Groups. All functions/activities within the business units should now be reflected on the acttached.

The actions points from this excercise are:

1	to review and agree the attached mapping

2    consider and comment on highlighted groups that we have discussed in previous PRC meetings and ask for your comments or objections to moving them 	as indicated on the attachment.

3	invite your comments or questions on any other function that you consider questionable or requiring further explanation.

      Please return your comments to David Oxley by Friday May 25.

      To have this discussion now will save lengthy discussions in the final VP/MD PRC Meetings.  Definitions of the peer groups are also attached for your ease of
      reference.


TW is currently in negotiations with a handful of shippers regarding 3 blocks
of unsubscribed firm capacity:

Block One
Volume: 27,500 MMBtu/d
Term:  1 year, 01/01/02 thru 12/31/02
Receipt: San Juan, Ignacio or Blanco
Delivery: California Border-  not to exceed 13,500 MMBtu/d at Needles.
Price:  Floating.  Difference between NGI SoCal and IFERC, EPNG, San Juan
Award Criteria: Adjustment (+/-) to Floating price

Block Two
Volume: 49,000 MMBtu/d
Term:  1 year, 01/01/03 thru 12/31/03
Receipt: San Juan, Ignacio or Blanco
Delivery: California Border-  not to exceed 35,000 MMBtu/d at Needles.
Price:  Floating.  Difference between NGI SoCal and IFERC, EPNG, San Juan
Award Criteria: Adjustment (+/-) to Floating price

Block Three
Volume: 11,000 MMBtu/d
Term:  2 years, 01/01/02 thru 12/31/03
Receipt: San Juan, Ignacio or Blanco
Delivery: East of Thoreau
Price:  Floating.  Difference between NGI SoCal and IFERC, EPNG, San Juan *
Award Criteria: Adjustment (+/-) to Floating price

*Mismatch between delivery point and pricing location is an attempt to
capture more of the spread value.  However, early discussions with shippers
indicates the structure may not be marketable.  We may ultimately revert to
selling it on a "San Juan to EOT" basis.

Transwestern attempted to impose a deadline for consideration of these blocks
on Friday, Jan. 5,  in order to bring closure.  However, some parties were
not able to comply and will be providing proposals on Monday.

If an acceptable offer for one or more of these blocks (Blocks One and Two,
in particular) is received on Monday, then in addition to the preparation of
the physical gas transportation contract, a hedging strategy to lock-in the
spread value should be implemented.

I've spoken with Dave Neubauer and others (Larry, Morgan, Vernon and Theresa)
regarding the execution of an appropriate risk management strategy.  In
particular, I spoke with Morgan about hedging the basis risk by executing
fixed/floating price swaps at the receipt and delivery ends.  We've already
talked with the potential shippers about using NGI SoCal at the California
Border and IFERC, EPNG, San Juan for receipts.  These indices appear to be
the most liquid with respect to trading the paper.  They are also highly
correlated to physical prices at the receipt and delivery locations off
Transwestern.

If the physical transport deals are completed on Monday, I believe we should
move to execute derivative instruments to hedge the basis spread.
Indications from counterparties earlier in the week are showing about a $1.40
spread in '02 and $0.90 in '03.   However, given the current state of the gas
market, and after consulting with Steve Harris, I also believe we should
leave the price risk open on the fuel collection under these contracts.  It
seems imprudent at this point to lock-in fuel gas prices that are at
historically high levels.

I've attempted to at least "tee-up" the requisite paperwork that will
document the physical transaction, hedge transaction and attempted hedge
strategy.  I've included it below for your use if a hedge is indeed put on
for these pending transactions.  Please feel free to modify or to make such
changes as you see necessary.

I'll be in Washington D.C. on Monday and Tuesday.  I'll have my cell phone
with me and will be checking messages also.  Call if you have questions.


hi mark - i'm a gas trader on the west desk and one of my customers had some
issues with our electronic trading agreement.  the company is Arco Products,
adn their comments are on the attached file.  could you take a look at this
and give me an update.  thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000
03:47 PM ---------------------------

"David K. Dyck" <DDYCK@mail.arco.com> on 03/07/2000 03:49:15 PM
To: tkuyken@enron.com
cc: "James Wong" <JWONG@mail.arco.com>
Subject: ETA requested Revisions

Torrey, as promised I have attached ARCO's suggested revisions to the Enron
online trading agreement. I look forward to working toward a mutually
satisfactory agreement in this new and thorny area of e-commerce contracting.

Dave

(See attached file: ETA_revision0307.doc)

 - ETA_revision0307.doc


For your amusement---
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 11:11 AM -----

	"Neal S. Manne" <NMANNE@SusmanGodfrey.com>
	01/12/2001 02:02 PM

		 To: "RSanders (E-mail)" <Richard.B.Sanders@Enron.com>, "SSchindler (E-mail)"
<sschindler@schlaw.com>
		 cc: "Jonathan J. Ross" <JROSS@SusmanGodfrey.com>
		 Subject: glatzer

I received another fax from, and then a telephone call from, Bernard Glatzer
today.  JJR was with me for the call (I felt that he deserved it).

What a bizarre man  The fax, which I will send you,
says to me (and Jerry Pecht, the lawyer for Bear Stearns) that "the
defendants and/or their attorneys breached the settlement agreement with me
in Glatzer vs. Bear Stearns, with whose confidential details Enron is fully
familiar."

I have no idea what this means, or is intended to convey.

Glatzer called and left word for me to call him back; I did.  He told JJR
and I that he was interested in settling his case against Enron.  I told him
that I would pass that on to Enron, but that my sense was that Enron thought
it had already won the case.  Glatzer said that, no, there were still things
he was planning to file, do, etc. and that it might be better for Enron to
settle with him now "before new lawyers come into the case."

I am sure lawyers are just lining up to take this one for him.

I told him that I could either pass on his comments to Enron, or he could
fax me a specific settlement demand.  He said he would do the latter,
sometime next week.

I have omitted all of the truly bizarre aspects of the conversation.  He did
giggle a lot, talk about President Bush's transition team, and ask me
whether I minded if he and I had a social conversation.

I will send you a copy of whatever I receive from him.

Neal S. Manne
(713) 653-7827
nmanne@susmangodfrey.com


Energy Committee and Blackout Busters Participants...please find attached
the draft ISO Board memo for a proposed new planning standard for the San
Francisco Greater Bay Area.  This was forwarded to me by Barbara Barkovich.
You may want to review and provide feedback.  I will be happy to forward
your feedback to Carl and other contacts on the matter.  Thanks.  Laura

From: "Miller, Jeff (ISO)" <JMiller@caiso.com>
To: "Al McCuen" <amccuen@energy.state.ca.us>, "Ali Yari" <yari@sdge.com>,
"Barbara Barkovich" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "Barry Flynn"
<brflynn@pacbell.net>, "Bud Wegner" <hwegner@sdge.com>, "Carolyn Kehrein"
<cmkehrein@ems-ca.com>, "Chi Doan" <chi@water.ca.gov>, "Cliff Rochlin"
<crochlin@socalgas.com>, "Dan Wood" <danwooduse@aol.com>, "Dave Korinek"
<dkorinek@sdge.com>, "David Marcus" <dmarcus@slip.net>, "Ed Lucero"
<elucero@sempra.com>, "Eric Woychik" <estrategy@mindspring.com>, "Frank
Rierson" <fgrierson@aol.com>, "Gayatri Schilberg" <gayatri@jbsenergy.com>,
"JA Savage" <honest@compuserve.com>, "James A. Ross" <rcsstl@cdmnet.com>,
"James Leigh-Kendall" <JLeighK@smud.org>, "Jim Filippi"
<Jim.Filippi@gen.pge.com>, "Jim McCluskey" <jmcclusk@energy.state.ca.us>,
"Karen Griffin" <kgriffin@energy.state.ca.us>, "Karen Lindh"
<karen@klindh.com>, "Karen Shea" <kms0@pge.com>, "Kelly Lee"
<KCL@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Kishone Patel" <kpatel@sdge.com>, "Les Pereira"
<les@ncpa.com>, "Lyle Hill" <lhill@ci.riverside.ca.us>, "Mark Ziering"
<maz@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Martin Bauer" <mbauer@ibr2inet.mp.usbr.gov>, "Michael
Yeo" <myeo@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Michele Wynne" <mwynne@uoc.com>, "Mo Beshir"
<mbeshir@ladwp.com>, "Morteza Sabet" <sabet@wapa.gov>, "Patricia Mayfield"
<mayfiepl@sce.com>, "Paul Scheuerman" <pgs@ieee.org>, "Ramchandani, Ramesh"
<rxr@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Rebecca Berdahl" <rmberdahl@bpa.gov>, "Rick Buckingham"
<rbucking@energy.state.ca.us>, "Robert Jenkins" <rtj1@pge.com>, "Sean
Gallagher" <shg@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>, "Tim Wu"
<ctwu@ladwp.com>, "Tom Flynn" <tflynn@eob.ca.gov>, "Tony Lam"
<tonylam@water.ca.gov>, "Tony Velarde" <velardac@sce.com>
Cc: "Clyde Loutan" <CLoutan@caiso.com>, "Elena Schmid" <ESchmid@caiso.com>,
"ISO Grid Planning"
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISOGRIDPLNG@caiso.co
m>, "Kevin Graves" <KGraves@caiso.com>, "Philip Pettingill"
<PPettingill@caiso.com>, "Ron Calvert" <RCalvert@caiso.com>, "Ron Daschmans"
<RDaschmans@caiso.com>, "Stephanie McCorkle" <SMcCorkle@caiso.com>, "Steve
Greenleaf" <SGreenleaf@caiso.com>, "Tracy Bibb" <TBibb@caiso.com>, "Ty
Larson" <TLarson@caiso.com>, "Vicken Kasarjian" <VKasarjian@caiso.com>
Subject: SF Greater Bay Area Planning Standard
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 15:55:03 -0700
Message-ID: <132A7F5BA87AD311AB8200508B7306E1036D8DE3@csifiapp667.wepex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0041_01C0C0EB.9F7582E0"
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

To: ISO Grid Planning Standards Committee

Attached for your review and comment is the draft ISO Board memo for our
proposed new planning standard for the San Francisco Greater Bay Area. This
issue is scheduled to go to the ISO Board in late April or early May. Please
review this memo and provide me with your comments via e-mail by April 16.
Thanks for all of you help on this.

Also attached is a draft agenda for our next meeting which will be on May
3rd at the Sacramento Airport Host Hotel from 10:00 to 3:00. Additional
meeting materials will be sent out prior to the meeting. Hope to see you
then.

Jeff Miller

 <<4-2001 SF Generation Outage Standard #3.doc>>  <<Agenda 5-3-01.doc>>

Jeff Miller
Regional Transmission Manager
California ISO
Phone: 916-351-4464
Fax: 916-351-2272
E-Mail jmiller@caiso.com

 - 4-2001 SF Generation Outage Standard #3.doc
 - Agenda 5-3-01.doc


GT,  Ticket went Fedex today, and should be there tommorrow after 10 am.  If
not please let me know.  I will get tix to Big 12 game and join the party
bus.  Is Stacy going? Sar!


Thanks in advance for agreeing to speak at the Global Operations Controller
Forum.  There will be approximately 30 Enron business controllers present at
the meeting.  All have responsibility for mid and back office operations for
the following Enron entities:  Enron North America, Enron Europe, Enron South
America, Enron Global Markets, Enron Industrial Markets, Enron Broadband
Services and Enron Energy Services.  Attendees will be here from Houston,
Calgary, Tokyo, Sydney, London and New York (metals business-maybe!).

Attached for your reference is the agenda. There may be some slight changes
before the forum begins, but this will give you a good idea of the topics to
be covered and the other speakers who will address the group.

You are scheduled to address the group as follows:

Date:  Monday, October 23, 2000
Time:  3:30 pm
Place:  The Warwick Hotel
  The Versailles Room - 12th Floor
  5701 Main Street
  Houston,  TX  77005

I have noted that your topic will be assessing, measuring and managing market
risk.  Any references that you could make to the importance of information
flow between RAC and operations would be great to cover.  Feel free to offer
up a challenge to the group.

I hope that you will be able to join us for the tour of Enron Field and for
dinner at Ruggles Center Field Terrace on Monday evening.  The tour is at
6:00 and dinner is at 7:00.


When: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:15 AM-9:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: 724

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please plan on attending a (short) meeting on Friday (11/16) at 8:15 to discuss our strategy for Station 4.  As you know, Marketing and Operations have determined that Station 4 will not be installed under the Red Rock docket.  They have requested Environmental withdraw the application for the air permit, which I believe they are currently working on.  The overhauls for the existing three units are currently scheduled to begin in March 2002.


hello my sugar my hero sugar.  My hero that got the splinter out of the hoopy.  I love you so much.  I have had a wonderful weekend with you as usual.  I hope that you did as well.  I love and miss you already.  i will be home shortly.  I hope that you had a wonderful nap.  See you soon.

The Pigs


That is great.  Will you buy one for me?


Thanks for following up on this.

I think we're generally there in terms of the commercial terms, but need to
think through just a few issues related to our plans for the asset.

I'd suggest we meet on Thursday as I believe the asset manager (Mike
Mazowita) will be here in Houston.  In addition to John's list of attendees,
Chuck Ward, John King and I should be in the meeting.  I'll ask Tina Tennant
to corrdinate.

RH

---------------------- Forwarded by Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 04:56
PM ---------------------------
From: Sandi M Braband on 09/26/2000 01:27 PM
To: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cornhusker

Rick,
Just following up my voicemail to you yesterday ---John Griffith has
contacted me regarding the gas management agreement relating to the
Cornhusker transaction. When Dan was in my office several weeks ago, we spoke
with you and it appeared that some of the financial terms of the gas
management agreement were yet to be worked out--has that occurred yet? Do you
know the details of the extension on the transition agreement? Are you
available to meet on this in the next day or two and is there anyone else you
think should be included? (John Griffith has asked to be included and
suggests Darren Farmer and Bob Hall be present as well)--Please let me know

Thank you,
Sandi
ext. 35465


Notice #00-386
November 8, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS
ALL MEMBER FIRMS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice-President

SUBJECT: EXCHANGE TO ALLOW STRIP TRADING IN PROPANE
______________________________________________________________________________
___

The Exchange has received approval from the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission to allow strip trading in the Propane Contract.  The rule
amendment is attached below.

This rule amendment will become effective beginning on Friday, November 10th.

If you have any questions, please contact Daniel Brusstar at (212) 299-2604.

RULE AMENDMENT
(ALL CAPS represents an addition, and [brackets] a deletion)

NYMEX Floor Rules
Rule 6.08D.   STRIP TRANSACTIONS

(A) Definition:  A strip transaction shall consist of either the simultaneous
purchase or sale of an equal number of contracts in each of two or more
consecutive contract months for crude oil futures, natural gas futures,
heating oil futures, gasoline futures, PROPANE FUTURES, or electricity
futures for a single account that is quoted and traded at a single price.

(B) Floor Members executing strip transactions shall properly record them in
writing so as to permit the identification of the strip transactions and the
parties thereto.  All strip transactions for futures contracts for crude oil,
natural gas, heating oil, gasoline, PROPANE, or electricity on the Exchange
trading floor must be made by open outcry in the trading rings for crude oil,
natural gas, heating oil, gasoline, PROPANE, or electricity, as applicable.
All strip transactions must be in line with prevailing contract prices for
strip transactions and the prices of futures contracts for crude oil, natural
gas, heating oil, gasoline, PROPANE, or electricity, as applicable,
comprising the strip transaction shall be within the permissible price limits
of the contract months traded.

(C) The seller in each strip transaction must report on the hard copy ply of
his or her trading card the price of the strip transaction to the Exchange.
The Exchange shall then assign the prices for each of the crude oil, natural
gas, heating oil, gasoline, PROPANE, or electricity futures contracts months
comprising the strip transaction pursuant to a methodology as established by
the Exchange.

(D) Except as provided in Rule 6.08C(C), strip transactions shall not set off
stops in any contract.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(00-386)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Kim,
 I have reviewed your markup of the redlined contract I forwarded to you last
Wednesday.  Since you confirmed that we were merely putting into place a
three month contract, we should be able to resolve the issues rather
quickly.  If we were working on the Master, I would agree that we are a long
way apart.  Let me respond to the changes you put in your last redline.

 1. Delete the definition of "Credit Support Provider".
 2. Add definition as follows:  The term "Guarantor" means, as to Seller,
Seller's ultimate parent, Enron Corp.
 3. Restore the definition of Material Adverse Change to the language as
provided in my redline to you.  It is the position of our Credit Department
that a rating of BBB- is considered investment grade and as such that is the
benchmark below which a material adverse change would be triggered.  Enron
Corp. is currently rates as BBB.
 4. The changes that you made in 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.2.1 are okay.  The
change that was made to 2.2.2. should be deleted.
 5. The change that was made to 2.3.1 and 2.4.1 is okay.
 6. The changes that were made in 9.1 should be removed because the sale and
purchase quantity is based on the DCQ.   Note that all settlements under the
Contract are based on the DCQ and any variations between actual and DCQ is to
be handled between the party and its transporter.
 7. The change in 9.3 should be changed back to five (5) Days instead of 10
Days.  5 days is the equivalent of 60 days deliveries, changing to 10 would
mean 65 delivery days have elapsed before the Seller can notify Buyer of a
payment default.
 8. The change in 10.2 of "at or" should be restored.  This is a 3 month
deal.  Seller's position is that Buyer is responsible for any taxes at or
after delivery.  Future Taxes are not applicable to a 3 month deal.
 9. All of the changes made to 12.2, 12.3 and 12.5 should be removed.  There
is no partial force majeure, a party is either unable to perform because of
the event or the party can perform.  Please explain how the loss of Buyer's
market could be due to an event of Force Majeure and why the Buyer should not
be required to find a new market during such period.  Force Majeure should
only allow termination if the period extends for more than 180 Days and then
it should only be a triggering event allowing the other party to terminate
and collect a Termination Payment.
 10.   The change in 14 should be deleted.  There is no event which would
allow early termination other than a Triggering Event.
 11. Please explain the changes in 16.4.  Seller has provided all of the
notice address information that will be put in the Contract.  No telephone
number or other address will be added.
 12. All of the changes made to 17.1, 17.2, 17.3 and 17.4 should be deleted
and the original language provided in my previous redline should be
restored.  These are requirements set forth by Enron's credit requirement and
are not subject to negotiation by me.
 13. I have no problem with the changes proposed for 18.1, 18.2, 18.3 nor the
addition of 18.4; however, I do not believe that either party would be able
to locate qualified arbitrators who would agree to the shortened periods.
Please reconsider.
 14. The changes made to the guaranty document appear to be acceptable and I
would forward same to Enron Corp. for their consideration.

 Please review the Contract in light of the matters raised above and let me
have your comments so that we can get this finalized as soon as possible.

	"Kim Decell" <kdecell@gassupplyconsulting.com>
	11/28/2000 01:48 PM

		 To: <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: WPS contract

Dan-

Attached is a redline document showing our counter to your redline proposal.
The majority of your changes were fine, from my perspective, with minor
tweaking (for example, timelines in arbitration).  The two primary items I
think we will need to discuss are (1) Taxes and (2) the definition of a
Material Adverse Change.  Please see my suggestions and then we can discuss.
As part of this discussion, could you please provide Enron North America
Corp's and Enron Corp's S&P debt ratings?

Please note that any changes we discuss will be subject to the final
approval of Wisconsin Public Service.

Please provide me with an estimated response time (ie, this afternoon,
tomorrow morning), so I can keep WPSC apprised.

Thanks for your help!

Kim Decell

Gas Supply Consulting, Inc.
(281)558-0735
kdecell@gassupplyconsulting.com

 - WPS Enron redline response COMPARE GSC counter.doc


On Sunday, April 7 2002 at 2am, Daylight Savings Time begins.
Please ensure your windfarm is in the following configuration.

Plant PCs should have "Automatically adjust clock for daylight saving
changes" NOT checked
 - Double-click on time in lower right corner of Plant PC to verify/configure
 - During site commissioning, all WTGs should have been configured for NOT
checked.

Park PC should have "Automatically adjust clock for daylight saving changes"
NOT checked
 - Double-click on time in lower right corner of PC  to verify/configure
 - During site commissioning, Park PCs should have been configured for NOT
checked.

Required Action
Park PC must be manually adjusted for the time change.

Time synch program must be running from Park PC.
 - Reference SUB 374, distributed in February 2002.
 - Note:  Time synch program must be manually restarted any time the Park PC
re-boots.

Discussion
The Time synch program will synchronize all WTG PCs
The Time synch program runs on the Park PC
The Park PC must NOT be set to automatically adjust for Daylight Savings time
because this will cause the Time synch program to send the incorrect time to
the WTGs (This is because Microsoft Windows uses Greenwhich Mean time and
converts to local time, including Daylight Savings)

Time-synch must not be checked at Plant or Park because a Windows prompt
appears at 2am April 7 asking if automatic update to Daylight Savings Time is
OK.  This prompt requires a person to manually respond.  If the PC re-boots
before the manual response, the PC will not complete its boot process because
it is again waiting for a manual response to the prompt.  This means that
VisuPro will not start, and will not collect WTG data from the Bachmann.

Verification of Plant PCs  "Automatically adjust clock for daylight saving
changes" NOT checked can be performed from the Park PC after 2am April 7.
Look at the WTG time on the Network Overview screen.  Any WTGs that are one
hour different require configuration at the WTG.

If questions, contact Ron Brzezinski, Joe Chapman, or Alaadin Suliman.

Thank you.

Ron


Start Date: 3/1/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030104.txt


Following is our schedule for next year's meetings, which will all take place in 49C2 video conference room from 8:30AM to 1:00PM.   Please mark your calendars.

February 13, 2002
April 10, 2002
June 12, 2002
August 14, 2002
October 9, 2002
December 11, 2002

And don't forget, we have more meeting left this year, December 12, 2001.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Cindy Stark
Executive Assistant to Stan Horton
Tel:   713/853-6197
Fax:  713/345-7047
Cindy.Stark@enron.com


Ben,

I know you want to put Certosa Holdings on the back burner for a while but
unfortunately we can't stop the process unless we withdrawal our request for
unusual use permit.   If we do so, we can not re-submit for 18 months.
Since the application was submitted in the name of Certosa Holdings, if the
property is conveyed to another entity, it may be possible to re-submit under
this new entity.  I've asked Kay to look into the possibility if throwing
Certosa Holdings into bankruptcy.  I have not heard back but here are my
thoughts:
 (1) We are not a creditor and therefore we may not have the ability to put
CH in bankruptcy
 (2) If we can deem CH in default of the option agreement,  one of the
remedies is reimbursement.  Since CH is illiquid, we would automatically be a
creditor with the       ability to throw them into bankruptcy
 (3) Once in bankruptcy, I don't know what would happen.  There are no
secured creditors and we would be the only unsecured creditor.
 (4) Whether bankruptcy would halt the unusual use permit approval process or
not, I do not know.
Until we determine if bankruptcy helps, us we have no choice but to proceed.

I estimate the burn rate will be between $50,000 and $60,000 per month
through October.  This is broken down into four types of costs:
 (a) lobbyists: $17,000 per month from June through October plus $210,000 in
success fees if we get project approval from the commissioners.
 (b) yet to be negotiated option consideration:  $20k to $35k to Certosa
Holdings as well as an adjacent property owner looking for a buyout
 (c) land fill closure related activities: $35,000 (ground water testing,
fencing the property and funding assistance to get $800,000 of bond money
released to reimburse       closure costs)
 (d) Consultants and lawyers: $23,000 per month

As you know we are now out of the jurisdiction of the CZAB and in the
jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners.  Below is a summary of
where we are and where we need to go.  Please let me know when you have a few
minutes to discuss this project.

Renew or New Option Agreement:
We need to renegotiate the Option Agreement with Certosa Holdings:  Rather
than giving CH a chunk of money that could disappear immediately, I'd like to
structure an arrangement where we fund, as long as the Option Agreement is in
effect (we don't terminate before expiration), some landfill closure work.
This benefits both Enron and CH as DERM will be more amenable to amending the
Consent Agreement that sets out the time table of closure if they can see
some progress.  I an trying to get with Kay to discuss alternatives.  We need
to be aware that CH could file bankruptcy sooner or later.  I checked the
Option Agreement and unlike some of the other agreements, this one does not
appear to have bankruptcy as a default.  If we have to give CH anything I
would want to give him only a nominal amount of money;  $25k max

Option on adjacent property:
As referenced above, we (Kerri) have been contacted  by an attorney
representing a property owner adjacent to the CH site who may be looking for
a buy out.  The property is wetlands and should be relatively cheap
considering it is useless.

Unusual Use Permit Application and Claim of Taking:
We expect to present the project and argue the taking issue before the
Development of Impact Committee ("DIC") in July.  This is a committee of
County Department heads.  They will make a recommendation to the Board of
County Commissioners who will hear the merits of the project and decide on
whether to approve the project.  Only if they reject the project does the
taking issue come into play.  I will work to target the Board of County
Commissioners hearing for October.

You are aware of the ordinance we propose to discuss with the Commissioners.
I'd like to talk to you about this when you have time.

DERM (Department of Environmental Resource Management) issues:
When we executed this option agreement, we fully expected CH to have closed
the landfill by now.  Obviously things have changed.

We (Kerri, Valorie Settles of Shutts & Bowen and I) met DERM last week.  DERM
is willing to consider revising the Consent Agreement and the schedule of
closing the landfill.  We discussed creating a 3 phase closure.  the first
phase would be the easy (cheap) stuff as discussed above.  The second phase
would be more expensive and may include removal of a pile of wood for $171k
and or removal of exotics from the wetlands for $83k.  The second phase would
be times to occur after we received County Commissioners approval for the
Unusual Use Permit.  The third phase would be the very expensive stuff ($
millions) and would be timed to be when we expect to exercise the option.

Consultant Agreements for Lobbyists:
We have been working with one lobbyist, whose contract expired at the end of
May.  Another, a former chief of staff of the commissionwer whose district
the project is in, publishes a newspaper called the Gospel Truth, which
recently published an article about the project and the need for power


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042424.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: -525.00 / Final: -511.10)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  TRADING_SC: NES1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:   0.47 / Final:   0.31)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:   5.07 / Final:   3.34)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:  46.37 / Final:  33.78)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI