talking today

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Monday, March 18, 2002 9:22 AM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	RE:

Just finish Centana and then we can work on the next thing.  By the way, any word from your buddy at Duke?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Monday, March 18, 2002 9:19 AM
To:	Zisman, Stuart
Subject:	RE:

Sure would like to be able to sell that inventory.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Monday, March 18, 2002 9:17 AM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	RE:

Nothing has changed.  We are still trying to figure our some way to sell this short/long term.  In fact, I have requested permission to show these documents to potentially interested third parties and haven't heard back from ChevTex.

Stuart

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Monday, March 18, 2002 9:03 AM
To:	Zisman, Stuart
Subject:

What's the status of the Bridgeline Transportation and Storage?


I know that I have more data, but can't find it what I have now is:

John Woodyard
Roy F. Weston
2300 Clayton Road, Suite 1550
Concord CA
94529-2148
(847) 918-4008
(847) 918-4055 Fax

Fred Decker
Vector Group Inc.
1118 Ferris Road
Cincinnati, OH
45102
(513) 752-8988

I hope that this is of assistance.

Leo


Please see attached

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 02:28 PM -----

	Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
	05/25/2001 02:00 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: GTC Excess 6 months

Term Firm Sale

CP: Mainline Energy LLC
Sitara # 812801
Tagg# VC3422.1
Term: 07/01/01 - 06/30/02

GTC Sale Firm est. #96061017


John,  I've rewritten the beginning of this notice to be more consistent with the posting we did for the Bushton shut down and receipt of C6+ gas in Jan etc.

	"Northern has been notified by ElPaso that the nitrogen level being delivered at the Keystone Interconnect (POI 169) exceeded their tariff specification on October 11, 2001 and as a result gas was not confirmed for delivery to them at that point.  Northern has reviewed the gas composition for the receipts in the area, and gas received by Northern with a high nitrogen content in this area may not be confirmed for receipt or curtailed, if previously scheduled, in accordance with gas quality specifications in section 44 of Northern's tariff.  If this becomes necessary, the points listed below will be allocated or curtailed in the following order based on the gas stream compostion.    List"

Insert your list, but We don't understand how this relates to Spraberry Area and Hobbs Area, what are the points???
Please call if you have any questions.

P.S.  I agree with Mary Kay's comments (of course).  Dari
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buchanan, John
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Blair, Lynn; Dornan, Dari; Darveaux, Mary; Stage, Michael G.; Williams, Jo; January, Steven; Miller, Mary Kay
Subject:	FW: Draft Statement on High Nitrogen

Please review the proposed posting concerning the high nitrogen issue with El Paso, and feel free to make suggestions or comments. Comments need to be submitted by Wednesday October 17th at noon to make sure this get posted to the Web in a timely manner.
Contact Penny McCarran ext.5416 or John Buchanan ext. 7429

Thanks: John Buchanan
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McCarran, Penny
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Buchanan, John
Cc:	Faucheaux, Eric
Subject:	Draft Statement on High Nitrogen

DRAFT

On October 11, 2001 Northern was informed by El Paso Natural Gas that the nitrogen level in the gas being delivered into El Paso's system at the El Paso/NNG Keystone interconnect (POI # 169) exceeded El Paso's nitrogen tariff specification.  El Paso's tariff restrict the nitrogen level in the gas stream to no more than 3%.  According to El Paso, the nitrogen level on October 11 at the Keystone interconnect was 3.5%.  El Paso refused to allow deliveries from Northern into El Paso on this day.

Northern does not have a tariff specification that restricts the receipt of gas with nitrogen over a certain level.  However, Section 44 of Northern's FERC Gas Tariff states that

	"The gas shall be commercially free from objectionable odors, solid matter, dust, gums and gum-forming constituents, or any other substance which may interfere 	with the merchantability of the gas, or cause injury to or interference with proper operation of the lines, meters, regulators, or other appliances through which it 	flows."

It is Northern's position that any gas which has a high nitrogen content that makes the gas delivered from Northern's system non-merchantable is subject to being curtailed/allocated.  Northern has reviewed the gas composition for the receipts in this area which would affect the total level of nitrogen in the gas stream.  If it becomes necessary for Northern to curtail receipts to ensure that the gas stream is merchantable to El Paso at the Keystone interconnect, gas receipts into Northern will be curtained/allocated according to the following order.  These points have been listed according the level of nitrogen in the gas stream.  The receipt point listed first has the highest level of nitrogen, the second point listed has the second highest level, etc.

		1.  NNG/Pinnacle Terry 			POI 60022
		2.  Gaines County #2			POI 401
		3.  Gaines County #3-NNG		POI 395
		4.  NNG/Altura Gaines			POI 78023
		5.  GPM Fullerton Plant			POI 36511
		6.  Adobe Plant				POI 25450
		7.  Spraberry Area
		8.  NNG/Amerada Hess Gaines Co.    	POI 78028
		9.  Warren Eunice			POI 6751
          	          10.  Hobbs Area																	   	          11.  LLano/NNG Lea			POI 200

If El Paso refuses to allow deliveries from Northern into EL Paso Keystone, Northern may require all gas to be received from shippers in this portion of our system to conform to the gas quality specification set forth in Section 44 of Northern's FERC Gas Tariff.  Any previously granted waivers by Northern of Section 44 of its FERC Gas Tariff relating to receipts shall no longer be effective until further notice.


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 03:01 PM -----

	"Webb, Beth" <WebbB@dsmo.com>
	03/06/2001 11:19 AM

		 To: "'dperlin@enron.com'" <dperlin@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron/NEGM GISB

Dear Debra:

As promised, here is a redraft of the language on the force majeure point:

"Enron recognizes that, when NEGM is acting as Buyer hereunder, NEGM is
purchasing gas on behalf of certain gas companies (the "Repurchasers") to
whom it immediately resells such gas at the Delivery Point(s).  In addition
to any other circumstances for which NEGM is entitled to claim force majeure
pursuant to this Contarct, Enron agrees that NEGM as Buyer shall be entitled
to claim force majeure if a Repurchaser purchasing gas from NEGM is unable
to take delivery or transport gas from the Delivery Point(s) as a result of
an event of force majeure.  The parties further agree that the term
"Transporter" when used in this Contract, including, but not limited to, in
Sections 4.1. and 11.1, shall include any company acting in the capacity of
a transporter for any Repurchaser and agree that Section 4.3 of the Contract
will apply to invoices from such Transporters for Imbalance Charges received
from such Transporters to the same extent as if such invoices were received
by NEGM, provided that any such Repurchaser scheduled and nominated the same
volumes as Enron and NEGM scheduled and nominated on behalf of such
Repurchaser at the Delivery Point(s)."

Hopefully this reflects our discussions of yesterday and today.  Best
regards, Beth

============================================================================Th
is e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may
contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for
delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you
have received this communication in error, and any review, use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this
e-mail message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original
message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@dsmo.com

Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP
http://www.legalinnovators.com


Kirk - My update was regarding storyline video with actors/actresses. Enron
Legal is now reviewing the scripts we will need for this video shoot.

This timeframe communicated below is NOT applicable for the Enron experts
who will be filming expert stories. The video shoots for the Enron Expert
Stories will be held December 10th and 11th and Ann Chen will be working on
this (I have forwarded her your response below). However, I agree with your
comment to Phillip. We need to identify these additional Enron experts to
be filmed as soon as possible.

Sorry for the confusion and again, thanks for your help.

Sheri A. Righi
Accenture
Human Performance Service Line
Hartford - One Financial Plaza
Direct Dial: 860 756 2245
VPN & Octel: 765 2245
e-mail: sheri.a.righi@Accenture.com

            Kirk.McDaniel@enron.c
            om                           To:     Michelle.Cash@enron.com, Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com,
                                         Tim.O'Rourke@enron.com, Yevgeny.Frolov@enron.com, Sheri A.
            11/27/2001 11:10 AM          Righi/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     RE: Updates to our Video Production Timeframes and Scope

Team
FYI

Sheri
The 3 SME's that have already committed to being on film need to be keep in
the lope regarding the timeline. Also check with these 2 SME's for
additional candidates (i.e. check with Mark Reese to see if Lamar Frazier
would be interested). I would like to be conferenced in on the media calls
& meetings. Also cc me on their emails or forward to me  their  emails.
This will keep me in the loop. Thanks

Phillip
If you have some additional people in mind, we need them identified as soon
as possible. Thanks

Cheers
Kirk
---------------------- Forwarded by Kirk McDaniel/HOU/EES on 11/27/2001
10:04 AM ---------------------------

sheri.a.righi@accenture.com on 11/27/2001 09:09:46 AM

To:   kmcdani@enron.com
cc:   donald.l.barnhart@accenture.com
Subject:  RE: Updates to our Video Production Timeframes and Scope

Kirk -

Thank you for helping us work towards sign-off from Enron Legal. Seeing as
you haven't been closely involved, I thought you'd like an update on our
media production tasks.

As you know, we are completing our planning phase for the production of the
storyline scripts. Our media vendor, Cramer, has been extremely helpful and
enjoyable to work with.  Below is an email from Steve, the director for our
storyline video, explaining where we are in the production process.

Have a good day!

Sheri A. Righi
Accenture
Human Performance Service Line
Hartford - One Financial Plaza
Direct Dial: 860 756 2245
VPN & Octel: 765 2245
e-mail: sheri.a.righi@Accenture.com

----- Forwarded by Sheri A. Righi/Internal/Accenture on 11/27/2001 09:05 AM
-----

            Steve Johnson
            <SJohnson@crameronline.co        To:     Sheri A.
Righi/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
            m>                               cc:     Chris Ciotoli
<CCiotoli@crameronline.com>
                                             Subject:     RE: Updates to
our Video Production Timeframes and Scope
            11/26/2001 11:27 AM

Hey Sheri,
I hope you had a great Thanksgiving! I can't believe it's over
already! Anyway...we've shuffled the schedule around, securing the 6th and
7th of
December for the shoot in the studio. We're working on finalizing the
edit dates to reflect that shift. Chris is moving to hold all talent for
those dates.

I guess it's now in the hands of legal! As soon as we confirm the edit
suite
availability
we'll revise and post the new schedule. We're scheduled for our weekly call
tomorrow but if
anything comes up just give me a buzz!
Thanks Sheri!
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: sheri.a.righi@accenture.com [mailto:sheri.a.righi@accenture.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:42 PM
To: SJohnson@crameronline.com; CCiotoli@crameronline.com
Cc: mery.l.brown@accenture.com; donald.l.barnhart@accenture.com;
jonathan.o.stahl@accenture.com
Subject: Updates to our Video Production Timeframes and Scope

Hello Steve and Chris -

Recently, there were changes to the overall number of our scenarios in our
simulation. There will be seven scenarios versus the nine we have been
discussing. These changes result in:
        Deletion of 2 intro and 2 exit videos
        Deletion of six interview questions (see more detail below)
        No additional characters. We will still need all characters (and
        talent) that we have casted for.

Laura has been working with John to make the required edits to the scripts.
We have recieved today (mid-day).

Based on our last discussion, I'd like to recommend we set the date for our
shoot for the end of the first week in Dec. Specifically, Dec. 6th and 7th.
This recommendation is based on the response I received from our project
manager in regards to the time it will take to have Legal review our
scripts.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you and have a
wonderful Thanksgiving!

Sheri A. Righi
Accenture
Human Performance Service Line
Hartford - One Financial Plaza
Direct Dial: 860 756 2245
VPN & Octel: 765 2245
e-mail: sheri.a.righi@Accenture.com

----- Forwarded by Sheri A. Righi/Internal/Accenture on 11/21/2001 01:30 PM
-----

            Laura A. de la Torre

                                         To:     Mery L.
Brown/Internal/Accenture@Accenture, Sheri A.
            11/20/2001 05:35 PM          Righi/Internal/Accenture@Accenture

                                         cc:

                                         Subject:     Conversion and
Arbitrage Q&A

These are the changes resulting from omitting conversion and arbitrage

From Scenario 6 Conversion:

-delete Q # 1, 2, 6
-move Q #3 to scenario 5 (power plant) and make the Q be for the financial
trader, Garcia
-move Q #4 and #5 to scenario 9 (storage) and make them be for the
structurer, Chen

From Scenario 7 Arbitrage:

-delete Q #1, 2, 3
-move Q#4 to scenario 9 (storage) and keep it as a Q for the physical
trader (Rick Lee)

Laura de la Torre
Accenture
Resources
Houston, Texas
Direct Dial  713.837.2133
Octel  83 / 72133

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


It's muster - to pass inspection...(how does mustard make sense?  It's not
like the Grey Poupon commercials.)

                     Main Entry: 1mus?ter
                     Pronunciation: 'm&s-t&r
                     Function: noun
                     Etymology: Middle English mustre, from Middle French
mostre,
                     monstre, from monstrer
                     Date: 14th century
                     1 : a representative specimen : SAMPLE
                     2 a : an act of assembling; specifically : formal
military inspection b :
                     critical examination c : an assembled group : COLLECTION
d :
                     INVENTORY

Get some rest, it's probably pretty easy to catch a cold with the damp, cold
weather there.

Susan


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2000
05:12 PM ---------------------------

Steven Harris
12/11/2000 04:42 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2000
04:35 PM ---------------------------

	From:  John R Keller                           12/08/2000 02:35 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jerry D
Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

Steve/Lorraine:

As promised, attached below is the "Level B" estimate for expanding Gallup
10mmcf/d.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

John
---------------------- Forwarded by John R Keller/OTS/Enron on 12/08/2000
02:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben Asante                           12/08/2000 02:28 PM

To: John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

John,
I am forwarding the Level B estimate for the Gallup modification. This
involves increasing the horsepower output (from 12,000  to 15,000 HP drive)at
the station
with a consequent flow increase of 10mmcfd.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
thanks
ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron on 12/08/2000 03:23
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Earl Chanley                           12/07/2000 04:50 PM

To: Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

---------------------- Forwarded by Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron on 12/07/2000
04:59 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Earl Chanley                           12/07/2000 03:27 PM

To: JERRY MARTIN/ENRON@enronxgate
cc: Norm Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Arnold L
Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

THERE WERE CHANGES IN DOLLARS DUE TO THE TESTING COMPLETED LAST WEEK. THE
COMPRESSOR WHEEL
IS ADEQUATE FOR CONDITIONS BUT IF PRESSURE CHANGES   WHEEL OR CASE MAY
REQUIRE ATTENTION AT THAT TIME.
THE DRIVE NEEDS TO DEVELOP 13,000 H.P.  AND WITH A SERVICE FACTOR OF 1.2, A
15,OOO H.P. DRIVE IS RECOMMENDED.


Upon further consideration, the ongoing responsibility of Doorstep activities
will fall to the Market Risk (Ted Murphy et al) group within RAC. My original
intention here was to streamline a costly and time consuming process and for
whatever reason it seems the exact opposite goal has been achieved.  Please
discontinue any activities related to this project. Thanks, Rick


Rahil & Mark

Here's the item that I'm concerned about.  Perhaps my ignorance is making me
over-zealous, but this concerns me.

Thanks

Jay

---------------------- Forwarded by James Bruce/LON/ECT on 23/03/2000 22:13
---------------------------

	From:  Donna Greif                           13/03/2000 16:30

To: James Bruce/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: EnronOnline Storage Newsticker

Jay,

The EnronOnline team gets those numbers from the weekly Newsletter
distributed the ENA Commercial Team.   Ross Prevatt is the individual who
actually puts the information together.

In talking with Ross this morning, that information is taken from a Telerate
feed  (the Telerate feeder gets the info from daily/weekly/monthly
publications).  Ross did not give me the specific companies that publish the
information.  Feel free to call Ross directly if you need additional
information.

Thanks,

dg

James Bruce   03/13/2000 04:05 AM

To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Dear Donna

(Following the voicemail that I left for you on Friday)  I was wondering if
you could tell me whether or not the US Gas Storage data & the cumulative
CDD/HDD data are taken from inside Enron only?  (I'm asking because Paul
Goddard has encouraged me to update our letters of consent for content that
we carry on the website.)

Many thanks,

Jay


Thanks for the invitation.  Unfortunately I am unable to attend as this is
the same night as our ETS Holiday Party.

Stan


In my first e-mail I left off the attachment.
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:08:38 -0400
From: "Michelle Veloso" <michelle.veloso@ferc.fed.us>
Subject: Follow-up Data Request for Bulk Power Investigation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_336BCF17.8AEB9542"

Attached is a follow-up data request for FERC's Bulk Power Investigation.
Please direct your response, as soon as possible, in care of Brian Harrington
via e-mail, if possible at the following address.

E-mail: Brian.Harrington@FERC.FED.US

FAX: 202-208-0193

Mail:   Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
          C/O Brian Harrington
          888 First St. N.E.
          Washington, D.C. 20426

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Brian Harrington
(202/208-2493) or me. Thank you for your prompt response.

Michelle Veloso
Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates
Energy Markets Division
202/208-2008
Content-Type: application/wordperfect8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Generators#2.wpd"
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FYI, particularly the part about the performance management system.  Let's
see what kind of data we can get about the Microsoft evaluation system to
find the differences.  Thanks.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 09:22
AM ---------------------------

Jane Allen
10/20/2000 08:43 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Microsoft Lawsuit

What are your thoughts?

Jane J. Allen
Enron Corp
Global Employee Services
Phone - 713/345-5064
Fax - 713/646-9501
----- Forwarded by Jane Allen/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 08:42 AM -----

	Tara Rozen
	10/18/2000 04:43 AM

		 To: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Callahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Bobbi
Tessandori/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Madeline Fox/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Microsoft Lawsuit

Hi. Some interesting reading. Although it doesn't explicitly relate to
foreign assignments, I am aware that our assignments to and from Europe are
predominately white males and I am assuming that this is the case globally as
well.  I am sure that if Enron was ever filed with a lawsuit for
discrimination, this could be an area that would negatively affect the
outcome of Enron's defence as foreign assignments generally provide career
development opportunities that most non-white males at Enron are missing out
on.

Tara
---------------------- Forwarded by Tara Rozen/LON/ECT on 18/10/2000 10:40
---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  Melissa Laing                           17/10/2000 18:16

To: Kirsten Ross/LON/ECT@ECT, Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT, Madeline
Fox/LON/ECT@ECT, Michele Small/LON/ECT@ECT, Alison Henry/LON/ECT@ECT, Julie
Hayward/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Nigel Sellens/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Microsoft Lawsuit

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Laing/LON/ECT on 17/10/2000 18:20
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Felecia Acevedo @ ENRON                           17/10/2000 16:53

To: Sheila Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ron James/HOU/EES@EES, Willie
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Chris Tull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Philpott/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Carrera/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Charles
Gauthier/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ann Vaughn/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jana
Domke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kari Oquinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Feuerbacher/Corp/Enron@Enron, Felecia Acevedo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa
Laing/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Rizzi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michele Small/LON/ECT@ECT, Shelly Pierce/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Microsoft Lawsuit

Thought I'd share this with the group.  This case will be watched very
closely because 1) it was filed against Microsoft, and 2) because of the
large potential class of plaintiffs.  Class action suits are an employers
worst nightmare (think Texaco and Coca-Cola).

Please feel free to share this with your management.

````````````````````````````````````````````````

No. 200
Monday, October 16, 2000 Page A-3
ISSN 1522-5968

News

Discrimination Suit
Filed by Microsoft Salaried Employee
Alleges Discrimination Based on Race, Sex

SEATTLE--A suit has been filed against Microsoft Corp. alleging the company
maintains a systemic and pervasive practice of discriminating against African
American and female salaried employees, affecting pay rates and promotion
opportunities (Donaldson v. Microsoft Corp., W.D. Wash., No. C00-1684P,
10/4/00).
Such discrimination at the company "is the standard operating procedure," the
lawsuit said.

The suit filed Oct. 4 in federal court in Seattle seeks back pay, other job
benefits, and compensatory and punitive damages for a proposed class of about
400 African American employees and some 4,500 female employees.

Mark Murray, company spokesman, said Microsoft does not tolerate
discrimination of any kind.

"We take these kinds of issues very seriously," Murray said regarding the
lawsuit. The company has an "active diversity policy" and seeks to recruit
and promote minorities and women, Murray told BNA Oct. 12. He said he could
not comment on any specific aspects of the lawsuit.

The class would include all current and former female salaried employees who
worked for Microsoft beginning Feb. 23, 1999, and all current and former
African American salaried employees who worked at the company beginning Oct.
4, 1998. Microsoft employs some 18,000 workers in the U.S. the complaint
said. About 2.5 percent to 3 percent are African American and about 26
percent are women.

Murray said the company has about 27,250 employees in the U.S., including
21,767 in Western Washington. In the U.S., 26.3 percent of Microsoft
employees are women and 22.2 percent minorities, he said.

The lawsuit was filed by Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll of Seattle. The
named plaintiff, Monique Donaldson, sued on behalf of herself and a class of
all similarly situated African American and similarly situated female
salaried employees at Microsoft.

"African American and female salaried employees of Microsoft are routinely
subjected to a pattern and practice of race and sex discrimination affecting
the terms and conditions of their employment" at the company, the complaint
said. The violations--of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil
Rights Act of 1991, and Civil Rights Act of 1871--are "systemic in nature,
and constitute a pattern and practice of conduct which permeates Microsoft's
operations," the lawsuit maintains.

'Excessive Subjectivity' Alleged

The complaint said the company allows "excessive subjectivity" in decisions
involving promotions and compensation. Microsoft has retaliated against
employees in the class who complained "either internally or externally about
Microsoft's treatment of African American and female employees by giving
unjustified lowered performance evaluations and constructively terminating
them."

The lawsuit said the company "uses an excessively subjective evaluation
system" that allows managers "who are predominantly white males, to rate
employees based upon their own biases rather than based upon merit."
Performance evaluations, for instance, use a five-point scal, but scores of
five, the highest number, are not awarded. Within any organization of the
company, only a certain number of employees are allowed to receive each
score, which can range from 2.5 to 4.5, the lawsuit said.

"Thus, no matter how good or bad the actual performance of employees a
certain number of them must still receive the lower scores." Any employee
with a 2.5 score is placed on a "personal improvement plan" or asked to
resign, the complaint said.

"Stack rankings" are used to rank employees in the same job category and
organizational unit from best to worst, the complaint said. Employees can be
ranked higher under the stack ranking than others who receive numerically
higher performance evaluations, the lawsuit said.

"Obtaining higher stack rankings is often governed by an employees' personal
popularity with other managers" because the rankings mix employees working
for different managers.

In addition to allowing discrimination in performance appraisals, the company
also has a pattern of paying African American and female employees salaries
"substantially lower" than those paid white males doing similar work, with
the same or lesser skills, and with similar or lesser experience, the lawsuit
said.

Furthermore, "excessively subjective decisionmaking criteria" are applied in
promotions, which favor white males with fewer qualifications than African
Americans and female employees.

By Nan Netherton

Copyright , 2000 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington D.C.


Scott -

In the DocSwapLogic we probably need to add in the ability to do online
negotiations and signing.  This is contemplated but not part of the current
development only because of the anticipated launch date of July 17.  Let me
know what you think.

Also, we need to move forward with BankLogic.

Also, I spoke to Mark Taylor earlier in the week about the status of "EOL" as
a shorthand means of referring to EnronOnline.  I had understood that there
was a move being made to obtain this mark or to register this so that we
could use it.  In speaking with Mark Holsworth, I understand you may have
some insight into the status.  If so, please let me know.  If not, we need to
look into moving forward with this also.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	"Brown, W. Scott" <sbrown@velaw.com>
	06/07/2001 02:53 PM

		 To: "'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'" <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: DocuSwapLogic Marketing Slick

Mark,

It should be no problem in getting a registration for ENRONONLINE REAL TIME
QUOTES.  However, it is a near certainty that we will be required to
disclaim any right to "real time quotes" apart from the mark as a whole.  If
you give me a description of the goods and/or services, I can go ahead and
file the application.

In regard to DOCSWAPLOGIC, please let me know if the following description
of services is acceptable:

"Online transaction-support services to provide secure document storage,
retrieval and sharing"

As you can see from the marks and descriptions below, I have tried to be
consistent with the other "Logic" related marks.

ADMINLOGIC  "Online transaction-support services to control user access to
online trading platform"

CONFIRMLOGIC  "Online transaction-support services to confirm physical and
financial trades"

NOMLOGIC  "Online transaction-support services to validate trades and
exchange nomination data"

INVOICELOGIC  "Online transaction-support services to provide automated
invoice reconciliation"

scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:41 AM
To: sbrown@velaw.com
Subject: DocuSwapLogic Marketing Slick

Scott -

Please see the below on DocuSwapLogic.

Also, I need to see if we can work on trademarking "EnronOnline Real Time
Quotes"

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001 11:39 AM -----

                    Kristin

                    Cantu/ENRON@e        To:     Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
                    nronXgate            cc:     Kim Monk/ENRON@enronXgate

                                         Subject:     DocuSwapLogic
Marketing Slick
                    06/07/2001

                    10:19 AM

Mark,

Attached is a draft marketing slick to use when obtaining the trademark.
We'll have a final marketing slick by the end of the month.

Let me know if you need more information.

Thanks,
Kristin
(See attached file: DocuLogic Marketing Slick_Draft.doc)

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Just a reminder we will have the initial meeting of the ENA/ AA Roundtable on
Friday at 9:00am in room EB30C1.  Again, the agenda is as follows:

Discussion of PRC
Immediate and future AA needs by business unit
Skill shortages
Campus and off-cycle recruitment
Mottom 10% management
Projecting AA needs from core schools for Summer 2001 intake
Existing talent in specialist roles who should be in AA Program
Ideas/suggestions on how we improve the Program/ENA retention

Your groups need to be represented and if you can't attend please send
someone to represent you.  Those of you out of town need to call me if you
have any input.    Thanks again for all your support.  Ted


Allyson,

Thank you for your prompt response.

Can you describe the process and timing for filing a project update?

Thanks,

Kay

"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 08/10/2000 09:45:11 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Fine, Jonathan" <JFine@kilstock.com>, "'Jeffrey.M.Keenan@enron.com'"
<Jeffrey.M.Keenan@enron.com>, "'Tom.Chapman@enron.com'"
<Tom.Chapman@enron.com>, "'Heather.Kroll@enron.com'"
<Heather.Kroll@enron.com>, "'Ozzie.Pagan@enron.com'" <Ozzie.Pagan@enron.com>

Subject: RE: NCNG Delivery Points

I inadvertently ended the sentence with a comma.  The point I was making was
that if it were necessary to negotiate an additional delivery point, NCNG
would probably demand concessions such as an extension of the contract
period.  Hopefully, since we are only talking about a high pressure tap,
NCNG will have less leverage.

Jeffrey and I did talk about amending the application some time ago;  he
expressed the concern that the description of the generators might be
misleading unless either more or less data were supplied, and he suggested
describing them more generally.  I think he was confortable with the fact
that the CPCN will be reviewed by electrical engineers who understand the
generators described without the elaboration he thought necessary.

One of the problems with amending the application is that you run the risk
that the Commission will adjust the time frames for intervention, etc.,
accordingly.  If you want to revise the description of the equipment, it
would be less dangerous to file a project update.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 6:48 PM
To: Duncan, Allyson
Cc: Fine, Jonathan; Jeffrey.Keenan@enron.com; Tom.Chapman@enron.com;
Heather.Kroll@enron.com; Ozzie.Pagan@enron.com
Subject: Re: NCNG Delivery Points

Allyson,

Thank you for the email.  It seems to stop in mid sentence, so I was
wondering if maybe something got deleted?

We have an interest in having the application for the CPCN amended to be
less specific on the equipment we will be using.  I believe Jeffrey may
have mentioned this to you before.  We would like to follow up with that
now, unless there is some significant problem with it.

Thank you,

Kay

"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 08/07/2000 02:27:23 PM

To:   "'Mann Kay'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Fine, Jonathan" <JFine@kilstock.com>

Subject:  NCNG Delivery Points

There would seem to me to be two questions--the threshold one is whether
the
site is within Rocky Mount's service territory.  If it is, then what
obligation does NCNG have with respect to the construction of a delivery
point.  I haven't reviewed the annexation statutes yet, but based on my
initial reading of the Service Area Territory Agreement between Rocky Mount
and NCNG, once annexed the site would come within Rocky Mount's purview to
serve, and, although a "mutually agreeable" delivery point would have to be
negotiated, NCNG would at least have to negotiate that in good faith.

The January 13, 1992 Service Area Territory Agreement gives Rocky Mount the
right to distribute natural gas within the city's incorporated limits as
well as a specified area outside the incorporated limits.   The contract
goes on to provide that should any part of that perimeter be annexed into
the city, "the respective rights of the parties as to service in any such
portion shall be determined by applicable case law and the General Statutes
of North Carolina. . ."  The contract further provides that absent an order
of the NCUC to the contrary, NCNG agrees that Rocky Mount has the right to
serve all end users within the "aforementioned" area--presumably referring
to the annexed area, although the agreement is not a model of clarity.

So, at least based on this language, Rocky Mount's right to serve arguably
tracks its incorporated limits, whatever they might be.  (Jonathan and I
are
looking at annexation law to see what else might be lurking out there).

The 1992 Service agreement provides, In Article IV, provides that points of
devliery for all natural gas purchased or transported under the agreement
with NCNG shall be "at the following locations and other stations added at
mutually agreeable locations in the future. . ." In the Third Amendment to
the Natural Gas Service Agreement, dated March 10, 1997, new language and
delivery points are negotiated upon, but the principle is still included
that  other stations may be added at "mutually agreeable locations in the
future."  The question which then arises is what Rocky Mount would have to
give in exchange.  In the 1997 agreement, Rocky Mount agreed to an
extention
of terms of the of ten years, until December 6,


There are 2 Clickpaper additions to the Approval spreadsheet.

Please see attached.

Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


would seem useful if we all contribute in some manner, but i'm open to
suggestions.  perhaps we could divvy up the questions.

Dylan Windham <dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu> on 09/07/2000 04:50:31 PM
To: dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu, kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu,
jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
cc:
Subject: E220 Case #1

Hello,

I have started to look at the case assignment for Monday.  Since, I will be
out of town the following week I will volunteer to write this one up.  I
don't know how he want to divvy up the work (by Questions or everyone does
it all), but let me know.  I have already made a spreadsheet with the
combined cash flow statement that I will send to you tomorrow.  Let me know
how we want to handle this.

--Dylan

Ofc. Dylan H. Windham
Threat Management/Domestic Violence Unit
University of California Police - Berkeley
Room 1 Sproul Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
(510) 642-1606


Between the Lines...
Issue  #7 ????November? 23, 2000
Biweekly Newsletter from?
[IMAGE]?

In This Issue:
1.?Inside sportingbetUSA.com
2.?Promotions
3.?NBA Schedule
4.?Featured Staff Member
5.?NFL Football Schedule
6.?Your Voice

??Inside sportingbetUSA.com

As many of our members already know, our parent company,  sportingbet.com
(UK) Plc, is one of the Internet's leading  online gaming companies with such
accomplishments as:

6th place ranking in the prestigious Management Today/Bain  & Co (top UK
Internet Start-ups index).
Award for Excellence in E-Commerce from the Information  Society Initiative
(UK Department of Trade and Industry).
Widespread publicity as it has been featured on CNN and the  BBC.
Significant press coverage for being a UK public company  traded on OFEX.

We are pleased to announce that we  will move from the OFEX trading facility
to the  Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock  Exchange, the
European equivalent of NASDAQ.

Consequently, trading in the shares of the Company on  OFEX has been
suspended until the new year.

sportingbet.com's betting system is based in the British  Channel Islands,
where we are fully regulated and licensed, and we  have offices in London,
Australia and Costa Rica

-Top-

??Promotions

STUFF THE TURKEY!!

sportingbetUSA.com's Stuff  the Turkey NFL and NBA drawing offers qualifying
members a chance to  win a grand prize by winning a random drawing which will
be held on  December 1st, 2000. Each time a sportingbetUSA.com member places
a  wager on a NFL or NBA "favorite", the client (existing member)  receives
one entry into the drawing. There is no limit for number of  entries per
participant. This is your last chance to win a Palm  VIIx handheld! Don't
miss out on this one! Instead give thanks  that it's going on for one more
week! Happy  Thanksgiving!!

Tell-A-Friend Reward

Our Tell-A-Friend  Program gives you a chance to win cash by referring family
and  friends to SportingbetUSA. When they open an account and make a
deposit, you get $50 deposited into your account and are also  automatically
entered into both a weekly and a monthly  drawing for cash!

Loyalty  Program

SportingbetUSA is proud to have you as our  customer, and we'd like to thank
you for choosing our services! Each  time you place a wager our loyalty
program rewards you with  Betfrequent points. These points will accumulate in
your account  until you decide to redeem them for one or more of our fabulous
 prizes.

*Please refer to our website for complete  details.

-Top-

??NBA  Schedule

All times are Eastern p.m.

Thursday,  November 23
Toronto at Indiana 8:00

Friday,  November 24
Orlando at Boston 7:30
Philadelphia at  Atlanta 7:30
Miami at Cleveland 7:30
Vancouver at Detroit  8:00
Washington at Indiana 8:00
Charlotte at Milwaukee 8:30
San Antonio at Denver 9:00
Golden State at Phoenix 9:00
New Jersey at Utah 10:00
L.A. Clippers at Seattle 10:00
Minnesota at L.A. Lakers 10:30

Saturday, November  25
Toronto at New York 1:00
Atlanta at Orlando 7:30
Houston at Miami 7:30
Cleveland at Charlotte 7:30
Milwaukee at Washington 8:00
Denver at Dallas 8:00
Philadelphia at San Antonio 8:30
New Jersey at Portland  10:00
Phoenix at L.A. Clippers 10:30
Minnesota at Golden  State 10:30
Seattle at Sacramento 10:30

Sunday,  November 26
Vancouver at Boston 12:30
Chicago at Toronto  3:00
Utah at Detroit 7:00

Monday, November 27
Vancouver at New York 7:30
Milwaukee at Orlando 7:30
L.A. Lakers at L.A. Clippers 10:30

Tuesday, November  28
Atlanta at Washington 7:00
Utah at New Jersey 7:30
Milwaukee at Miami 7:30
Boston at Cleveland 7:30
Toronto  at Dallas 8:00
Minnesota at Chicago 8:30
Sacramento at  Houston 8:30
Seattle at Portland 10:00
Indiana at L.A.  Lakers 10:30

Wednesday, November 29
Washington at  Philadelphia 7:00
Utah at Orlando 7:30 KJZZ
Toronto at  Charlotte 7:30
New Jersey at Detroit 7:30
Miami at New York  8:00
Denver at Minnesota 8:00
Sacramento at San Antonio 8:30
Phoenix at Vancouver 10:00
Golden State at L.A. Clippers  10:30

Thursday, November 30
Chicago at Atlanta  7:30
Boston at Milwaukee 8:00
Houston at Denver 9:00
Dallas at Portland 10:00
L.A. Lakers at Seattle 10:00
Indiana at Golden State 10:30

Friday, December 1
Charlotte at Philadelphia 7:00
L.A. Clippers at Toronto  7:00
Minnesota at Boston 7:30
New Jersey at Orlando 7:30
Utah at Miami 7:30
Cleveland at Detroit 8:00
New York at  Chicago 8:30
Indiana at Vancouver 10:00
San Antonio at L.A.  Lakers 10:30
Phoenix at Sacramento 10:30

Saturday,  December 2
Milwaukee at Atlanta 2:30
Minnesota at New  York 7:30
Orlando at New Jersey 7:30
Utah at Charlotte 7:30
Philadelphia at Cleveland 7:30
Miami at Washington 8:00
Portland at Houston 8:30
Seattle at Denver 9:00
Dallas  at Golden State 10:30

Sunday, December 3
L.A.  Clippers at Boston 12:30
Indiana at Milwaukee 3:00
San  Antonio at Vancouver 3:30
Washington at Detroit 7:00
Portland at Phoenix 8:00
Golden State at Seattle 9:00
Dallas at L.A. Lakers 9:30

Monday, December 4
L.A. Clippers at New York 7:30
Philadelphia at Denver  9:00

Tuesday, December 5
New Jersey at Indiana  7:00
Boston at Orlando 7:30
Miami at Atlanta 7:30
Charlotte at Cleveland 7:30
Chicago at Minnesota 8:00
San Antonio at Sacramento 8:00
Dallas at Houston 8:30
Toronto at Utah 9:00
Detroit at Vancouver 10:00
Philadelphia at L.A. Lakers 10:30

Wednesday, December  6
L.A. Clippers at Washington 7:00
Milwaukee at New  Jersey 7:30
Denver at Miami 7:30
Indiana at Charlotte 7:30
Cleveland at Chicago 8:00
New York at Dallas 8:00
Toronto at Portland 10:00
Detroit at Seattle 10:00
L.A.  Lakers at Golden State 10:30

Thursday, December 7
Denver at Orlando 7:30
Phoenix at Milwaukee 8:00
Washington at Minnesota 8:00
New York at San Antonio 8:00
Vancouver at Utah 9:00

NOTICE: Schedule subject to  change.

-Top-

?? Featured Staff  Member

Whether it has been to ask a question regarding a deposit or to  request a
fast payout, all of SportingbetUSA's members have at one  time or another
spoken to someone in our accounting department. It's  time to meet a member
of SportingbetUSA's professionally trained  accounting staff.

Accounting representative Sara

[IMAGE]"Hello. I'm Sara. I've been a member of the  SportingbetUSA family for
6 months now and look forward to working  here for a long time to come. I
aspire to become a marine geologist  and am currently studying at the local
university. I also play the  guitar and like to read Edgar Allen Poe. Italian
food, cheese  ravioli in particular, is my all time favorite food. It's even
better with a glass of red wine. Mmmm."

"The thing that I like the most about working here at  SportingbetUSA is the
customer interaction. I like answering our  customer's questions, explaining
our company's policies to them, and  just talking to them about where they
live or how they won the money  they are requesting. That's another thing I
like. When a customer  asks me for a payout, they are always so happy about
it that it  makes me happy. I guess we both end up winning."

You can read more about other featured SportingbetUSA staff  members, like
Sara, in future newsletters.

-Top-

??NFL Football Schedule

NFL  Schedule November 23 thru December 3, 2000

All times are  EST

Week  13

Thursday, Nov. 23
Minnesota at  Dallas, 3:05 p.m.
New England at Detroit, 12:30 p.m.

Sunday, Nov. 26
Atlanta at Oakland, 1:05 p.m.
Buffalo at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Chicago at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
Denver at Seattle, 1:15 p.m.
Kansas City at San Diego, 1:15 p.m.
Miami at Indianapolis, 1  p.m.
New Orleans at St. Louis, 12 p.m.
Philadelphia at  Washington, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Tennessee at Jacksonville, 4:15 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at Arizona,  6:35 p.m.

Monday, Nov. 27
Green Bay at Carolina, 9  p.m.
(Open date: San Francisco)

Week 14

Thursday, Nov. 30
Detroit at Minnesota, 7:35 p.m.

Sunday, Dec. 3
Arizona at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Jacksonville,  4:15 p.m.
Dallas at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Denver at New Orleans,  12 p.m.
Indianapolis at N.Y. Jets, 4:15 p.m.
Miami at  Buffalo, 1 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at Washington, 1 p.m.
Oakland at  Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at Carolina, 1 p.m.
San  Francisco at San Diego, 1:05 p.m.
Seattle at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Tennessee at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Chicago, 7:35  p.m.

Monday, Dec. 4
Kansas City at New England, 9  p.m.
(Open date: Baltimore)

-Top-

??Your  Voice

?

?

We at  sportingbetUSA.com look forward to your comments, ideas,  suggestions,
and questions. Your feedback is valued as we strive to  keep us at the top of
our game. So, send us your input. We,d really  appreciate it and after all,
this is your sports book.

To  unsuscribe from this newsletter send an email to
sportingbetusa-unsubscribe@lists.sportingbet.com  with the word "remove" on
the subject field.
No hard  feelings!

For Newsletter issues
newsletter@sportingbetusa.com
For loyalty program issues
betfrequent@sportingbetUSA.com
For affiliate network
affiliate@sportingbetUSA.com
For general questions or account problems
custserv@sportingbetUSA.com
For technical support on the web site
webmaster@sportingbetUSA.com
-Top-

?

[IMAGE]?? ...Get in the  Game !


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEPENO>
To: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com
Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:47:21 GMT
Subject:

Your message has been relayed
to the following recipient(s):

linda.stepenovitch@bankofamerica.com
Message relayed

The message was successfully delivered to 1 recipient(s)
at domain bankofamerica.com.

 - C.DTF
 - C.DTF


Steve,

I was informed that Malcom Gillis called you last Friday with some concerns
about EBS' performance.    I put calls into the Director of Networks (Ferrell
Gerbode) and his boss (Chuck Henry) on Friday to discuss this.   Ferrell
apologized and indicated that Gillis didn't understand the whole picture and
he pushed the panic button without talking to them.  I have not received a
call back from Chuck Henry and understand that he is travelling.

The primary bandwidth deal that we did with Rice was re-structured and
delayed until Feb '02 at Rice's request (back in October last year).   They
have now requested a small quantity of interim bandwidth to do some testing
between now and Feb '02.   EBS was slow to respond to this request (change of
account manager and not understanding their sense of urgency) and I believe
this is the source of the call.   We had addressed the problem by meeting
with them the week before, proposing an innovative solution and making a
proposal on Thursday last week.  Gillis wasn't aware that we had responded.
We are now waiting for their response.    Let me know if you would like
further information or if we owe a response to Gillis.

Thanks,

Brad


Stewart,
Yesterday at our meeting with Tim, I thought it was fairly clear that efforts
were to be made before deals were done to check out authorization.  This
morning you tell us you have done a 3 year deal with Merced and ask us to
check out the authorization question after the fact.   This is exactly the
opposite of what I thought we were all trying to do.  We don't really need to
call Merced.  We have the relevant legal paper.  You need to get  the
attorney from the finance group, Sara,  to tell you whether or not Merced is
authorized to do the deal you have already done.

I am working with the guys at Turlock to check out their authorizations.
----cgy

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: merced

Thanks for the response - You both have the approprate person at Merced to
contact to get clarification with respect to authorization.  They are aware
that you may call.  At this point they are fully hedged in the near term so
future deals will be back years (precisely the term we may be concerned with).

Stewart

From: Sara Shackleton on 09/01/2000 12:41 PM CDT
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: merced

The ISDA Master  does not circumscribe the trade term or trade parameters.
The issue which we discussed is authority.  The Merced resolution of March
16, 1999 specifically authorizes the general manager "...to develop and
provide appropriate information, and certifications for completing Master
Trading (ISDA) Agreements with energy vendors and execute Master Trading
(ISDA) Agreements and appropriate vendor Schedules to the ISDA Agreement for
the purpose of acquiring energy and stabilizing energy costs.  Such
executions are subject to Counsel review of the agreement and schedules as to
form."  There is no specific mention of authority to enter into transactions
(by Merced's traders).
Intuitively one could draw the conclusion that the ISDA Master contemplates
transactions, Merced authorized the ISDA Master and therefore Merced
authorized transactions under the ISDA Master.  Since Merced is a
governmental entity, the safer view is that we should not assume that Merced
authorized transactions.  Merced probably intended to authorize transactions,
and if so, should not have an issue with specifically providing a clarifying
resolution.
Sara

	Christian Yoder
	09/01/2000 11:22 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: merced

Does our ISDA with Merced contain wording that gives us legal comfort if we
do an 18 month trade?---cgy
---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000
09:17 AM ---------------------------
From: Stewart Rosman on 09/01/2000 08:13 AM
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: merced

You need to call Jim Day 916-441-0131 to discuss any authority issues
concerning Merced trades. He can discuss charter particulars.

Stewart


I will talk to George.

I am not sure Philippe stopped using them but I thought he shut off their carte blanche building access.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 10:51 AM
To:	Piper, Greg
Cc:	Wasaff, George
Subject:	PWC

Do you remember the problems you guys had with PWC and Enron Offline when they remarketed without your permission.  Philippe told me you guys had cut them off but I saw George Wasaff bring them in to see Mark today and George told me that he is using themin several different locations.  You and George may want to discuss as they did stepway out of line with you guys.

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


this is cute.
---------------------- Forwarded by Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron on
03/02/2000 08:24 AM ---------------------------

"BENEDICT PETERS" <bouncing98@hotmail.com> on 03/01/2000 05:18:22 PM
To: Regina.Blackshear@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Fw: [Fwd: Fwd: Birth Control]

>Subject: Fw: [Fwd: Fwd: Birth Control]
>Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 18:30:39 -0400
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

 - Laughing.htm


Jim:  To say that there was gaming in the UK pool is a significant
understatement.  Couple thoughts...I'm pretty sure that Seab has done
extensive analysis on the UK and he'd likely therefore be very useful in
developing rebuttal. (Though very close to it at one point, I've been removed
for a few years.)  Also, Schroeder and his gang could also likely shed some
insights, and seems that Schroeder's pretty close now with Littlechild---that
might be another avenue for information to rebut.

Best,
Jeff


Attached please find the Joint Consumer Group's responses to BPA data
requests BPA-JCG:01 - 11 and BPA-JCG:13 - 14.  Thank you.

 <<BPA-JCG-01.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-02.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-03.doc>>
<<BPA-JCG-04.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-05.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-06.doc>>
<<BPA-JCG-07.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-08.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-09.doc>>
<<BPA-JCG-10.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-11.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-13.doc>>  <<BPA-JCG-14.doc>>

Kelly C. Beniga
kbeniga @ schwabe.com
(503) 796-2445

NOTICE:  This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may
have received this communication in error,  please reply to the sender
indicating that fact and delete the copy you received.  In addition, you
should not print, copy,  retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the
information.       Thank you.
 - BPA-JCG-01.doc
 - BPA-JCG-02.doc
 - BPA-JCG-03.doc
 - BPA-JCG-04.doc
 - BPA-JCG-05.doc
 - BPA-JCG-06.doc
 - BPA-JCG-07.doc
 - BPA-JCG-08.doc
 - BPA-JCG-09.doc
 - BPA-JCG-10.doc
 - BPA-JCG-11.doc
 - BPA-JCG-13.doc
 - BPA-JCG-14.doc


Please mark your calendar with a Pulp Weekly Meeting scheduled by Rodney Malcolm for every Monday at 9:00am to 10:00am in conference room ECS 04075.

The London team will be participating via video conference.

Thanks,
Ana Alcantara


i am gonna bring it b/c i have the heart of a lion


Brothers:  "wonders NEVER cease."  To see Scott Mc Nabb and George Steinwart (my little brother no less) e-mail's on the SAME day!!  At the rate we are going, maybe SMU will be in a bowl game yet this year!!!!

C-Paul # 466 for those who don't remember
'72

PS  If you wonder why my roll number is so high, go ask my freshman counselor!!

________________________________________
Chuck Paul
A Closer Look
Professional Mystery Shopping Company
770-446-0590
Email: Chuck.Paul@A-Closer-Look.com
http://www.a-closer-look.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred D Haulenbeek [mailto:FredinVt@juno.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:42 PM
To: smu-betas@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [smu-betas] Dent's wrath

brothers:
if you wondered who samuraimai@aol.com  is...scroll to the bottom of this message.

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:50:29 EST samuraimai@aol.com  writes:
HAPPY HOLLOWEEN  FROM SAMURAIMAI  (#457 CLASS OF '73)
  Regarding U T winning the national championship.  What a JOKE!  I have
arranged to have the "JUNIOR COLLEGE'S" TOWER here in Austin demolished, as
it is the preferred site for the proposed Blanton Museum.  The tower will
never glow orange again.  It's also on the second tier target list for the
raghead's next flyby.
Best regards.  -KAI-
At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it up right where they left off years ago.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .

the answer is:  scott mcnabb
wooglin knows all
excuse the lower case...my left hand is out of action for 6 wks. due to an accident at work.  all the fingers remain, its just going to take some time for them to work again. until then i'm a hunt and pecker beeker.

At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it up right where they left off years ago.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

 At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it up right where they left off years ago.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .


yea, can you meet me at enron again?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Stephen Yarger" <styarger@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Stephen+20Yarger+22+20+3Cstyarger+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	Re: astros tix

They are yours for $300 if you want them.

----- Original Message -----
From: <John.Arnold@enron.com>
To: <styarger@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: RE: astros tix

> I would pay $300 for the tix tonight.  I feel ripped off for the crappy
> game I had to sit through tuesday.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Stephen Yarger" <styarger@hotmail.com>@ENRON
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Stephen+20Yarger+22+20+3Cstyarger+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+4
0ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:24 PM
>    To:     Arnold, John
>    Subject:  Re: astros tix
>
>    OK, I'll give you a call around 3:15 or so, I'll be driving a dark
green
>    Land Cruiser.
>
>
>    ----- Original Message -----
>    From: <John.Arnold@enron.com>
>    To: <styarger@hotmail.com>
>    Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:07 PM
>    Subject: RE: astros tix
>
>
>    > Sounds good.  I have cash.  I work at the old Enron building.  Just
>    give
>    me
>    > a call when you're close and I'll meet you on the street right in
>    front of
>    > the building.
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   "Stephen Yarger" <styarger@hotmail.com>@ENRON
>    >
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Stephen+20Yarger+22+20+3Cstyarger+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+4
>    0ENRON@ENRON.com]
>    >
>    >
>    >    Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:07 PM
>    >    To:     Arnold, John
>    >    Subject:  Re: astros tix
>    >
>    >    I get off work at 3:00 so I could bring them by your office at say
>    3:30
>    >    if
>    >    you could meet me at the ground floor (I'm assuming you work at
one
>    of
>    >    the
>    >    Enron buildings).  I'm new to this whole Ebay thing so I'm not
sure
>    what
>    >    all
>    >    the payment options are, but I'm thinking the easiest would be
>    cash,
>    but
>    >    if
>    >    you want to put it on credit card through Billpoint on Ebay that
is
>    fine
>    >    also.
>    >
>    >    Good luck on catching the million dollar ball.
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >    ----- Original Message -----
>    >    From: "Arnold, John" <John.Arnold@ENRON.com>
>    >    To: <styarger@hotmail.com>
>    >    Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:43 AM
>    >    Subject: astros tix
>    >
>    >
>    >    Hello:
>    >    Wondering if we can meet to pick up the tix.  I work and live in
>    >    downtown.  Please advise or call me at 713-557-3330.
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    **********************************************************************
>    >    This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>    affiliate
>    >    and
>    >    may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
>    of
>    the
>    >    intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure
>    by
>    >    others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>    recipient
>    (or
>    >    authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender
>    or
>    >    reply
>    >    to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
>    delete
>    >    all
>    >    copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
are
>    not
>    >    intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
>    evidence
>    >    a
>    >    binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
its
>    >    affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
>    not
>    >    be
>    >    relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>    otherwise.
>    >    Thank you.
>    >
>    **********************************************************************
>    >
>    >
>    >
>
>


The following companies have stated that they will not execute trades with Enron.  Some of these decisions appear to be regional or product specific.  For example Aquila executed a trade in the Central region but will not trade with Sandra.

East - AEP
         Sempra
         Mirant
         J Aaron
         TXU
         Aquila
         BP Amoco

Price - Dynegy
           Bank of Montreal
          Vitol
          Phibro
         J Aaron

Options - Williams
              AEP
              BP Amoco
              Vitol
              Hess (will sell options only)

Central - Mirant
             Enbridge
             Vector P/L
             Transcanada
             Sempra
             BP Canada
             Coral Canada
             PG&E Trading Canada

West - Burlington
           Salt River Project
           Socal Gas
           Dynegy
           Phibro
           TXU
           Coral
           Engage
          WESCO
           Entergy-Koch
           J Aaron (They are clicking to close out positions only)
           Mirant (close out positions only)

Physical Trading

East - The East did not notice any credit hording in the morning.  In the afternoon Tractebel is buying the physical balance of month .04 over the GD swap

Central - Dynegy Canada sold most of the gas to us.  The desk bid was .05 over NGX.  Nicor Hub would not accept an $87 pre-pay for a wheeling fee.

West - EOL Socal cash was trading .08 higher than ICE Socal.  The desk finished short and the market made it very difficult to buy.  EOL SJ cash traded .10 to .20 cents lower than ICE.  The only point without a credit spread was Opal.  Liquidity picked up slightly from Thursday and Friday, but still slow.

AEP was noticeably absent from all regions.


Thanks


The third quarter PCB meeting with Southern California Gas Company was held
this morning.  SoCal presented a third quarter invoce of their PCB management
and disposal activities for which Transwestern is responsible for $120,602.19
(86%).  All charges were appropriate and considered normal operating expenses
for PCB activities in California.  On a similar note, while speaking to Ralph
Komai, PCB person for SoCal, some interesting things are happening on their
system and are presented below:

SoCal is beginning to notice accumulations of PCB pipeline liquids on
portions of their system which has been considered PCB clean.  It is these
portions of their pipeline for which they have been petitioning EPA to
declassify.  These liquids are not new liquids introductions into the SoCal
system but historic liquids that have laid in their pipeline. Because of the
fact that Transwestern is not seeing liquids accumulations at the compressor
stations upstream of Needles, we know that liquids are not being sent inot
California.  Due to the increase of Transwestern gas into the SoCal system,
it appears  the gas is sweeping old historic liquids into these new pipeline
areas.

SoCal will be meeting with PG&E within the next couple of weeks to discuss
the discovery of pipeline liquids at an interconnect where SoCal provides
natural gas to PG&E.The PCB concentrations are less than 5 ppm.  The location
of this  interconnect is near Bakersfield, Ca.

Southwest Gas has requested that 2 filter separators be installed at 2
interconnects where they receive gas from SoCal.  As you know, Transwetern
supplies gas to SoCal who then provides gas to Southwest.   The price of the
2 separators will be approx. $33,000 plus installation charges.  Ralph stated
that theses charges will show up on the first or second quarter of 2002.  Of
note, Southwest has asked SoCal to install each separator on the SoCal side
of the interconnect which means that maintenance and operation of each
separator will be SoCal's responsiblility.  these charges will be passed on
to Transwestern at 86%.


Mitch,

I included your home info. Thanks.

Jinsung
(37330)


Business

Rate cap in S.D. stopgap solution PUC action not seen as cure-all for surging
electric bills
VANESSA HUA

?
09/08/2000
San Francisco Examiner

?

The price cap on San Diego's skyrocketing electricity rates mandated by state
regulators Thursday is only a stopgap solution to underlying flaws in energy
deregulation - problems that could plague PG&E customers in the future,
consumer groups and industry watchers say.
The California Public Utilities Commission voted 5-0 to cap electric rates at
6.5 cents per kilowatt hour. They had soared as high as 21 cents per kilowatt
hour this summer.
?

The commission also agreed to investigate whether San Diego Gas & Electric
has been paying too much for the power it supplies to its customers.
The actions, affirming legislation signed Wednesday by Gov. Davis, will
reduce the average customer's electric bill to $68 a month from the current
$120.
SDG&E, which serves San Diego County and southern Orange County, was the
first utility in the state to buy power on the open market - and the first to
pass soaring wholesale power costs to consumers.
Now, SDG&E will be able to charge customers far less than it pays for energy
in high-use months. The company projects that the shortfall between what it
has to pay for power and what it
can charge rate payers could reach $839 million by 2004. Area rate payers may
be asked to make up the difference, but just how that might be done has yet
to be determined, pending the outcome of the PUC investigation.
Likewise, PG&E - which said it has run about $2 billion in fuel expenses -
wants to pass it on to consumers with an extra charge in future power bills.
The San Francisco-based utility said that if SDG&E is allowed to pass its
increased costs to consumers, then it plans to seek the same treatment from
the PUC.
But for now, because of the state's electric restructuring law, PG&E's rates
will remain frozen until no later than March 2002.
San Diego's energy woes stem in part from the high demand for electricity in
a booming economy. The new energy suppliers and generators that were supposed
to foster competition and lower prices just haven't materialized under
deregulation, analysts said.
Now, the price cap on retail prices - lower than wholesale prices on the
power exchange - will further discourage new entrants.
"It's a question of who would be crazy enough to come. The marketplace is too
risky," said George Spencer, editor of Restructuring
Today, a Washington, D.C.-based newsletter about deregulation. "Putting on a
cap is a Band-Aid, not getting (to) the root of the problem."
The rate cap defers payments to the utilities, creating further market
uncertainty.
"Any kind of rate cap means that in the future SDG&E has to get it back. It's
like a big IOU. But I'm not quite sure how it's going to work out," said
Jamey Gessaman, marketing program manager for Wattage Monitor which assists
consumers in finding alternative electricity suppliers.
Truckee-based TenderLand Power Company, which aims to generate and sell
electricity from renewable resources, differentiates itself from SDG&E,
making clear that its prices - 8 cents per kilowatt hour - is not a deferred
payment plan. Their customers won't have to pay more, later, to make up for
the shortfall, a spokeswoman said.
Assemblywoman Susan Davis, D-San Diego, who authored the price cap
legislation, said that measures were a necessary first action in solving
electricity crisis over the long term.
"The most important thing to do was to stop bleeding in San Diego," she said.
Consumer advocates slammed
electricity deregulation as a legislative failure now punishing consumers.
"This is botched legislation. There have been so many screw-ups, in the way
it was set up and administered," said Michael Shames, executive director of
the Utility Consumers' Action Network in San Diego.
Gov. Davis defended deregulation Thursday by calling it "an experiment that
will work if everybody acts responsibly.
"The electrical generators that have bought up the facilities that exist in
California are now selling power back to us at between five and eight times
what it used to cost us," he said. "Utilities, who are now out of the
generation business are basically just in the distribution business, and
consumers - everybody has to accept their role and accept their share of the
short-term pain to make this program work."
In addition to the rate cap, Davis also signed a bill Wednesday that would
speed up the approval process for new power plants. That could ease the
soaring demand for electricity.
However, the governor put off action on a third bill - also passed with much
fanfare by the Legislature - that could provide up to $150 million in state
money to cov
er any future San Diego power debts.
While Gov. Davis said his decision on that measure could wait until later
this month, the timing increased speculation that he may veto the plan. Some
critics have argued that pledging public money to cover private power costs
could set a precedent leading to a far greater drain on taxpayers in the
future.
The PUC was scheduled to hold a hearing in San Diego on Friday to explore the
cause of high summer wholesale prices.
Examiner news services contributed to this report.


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 10:57 PM -----

	"Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>
	02/14/2001 04:06 PM

		 To: "Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "Andrea Weller
(E-mail) (E-mail)" <aweller@sel.com>, "andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<anchau@shellus.com>, "Bill Chen (E-mail) (E-mail)" <bchen@newenergy.com>,
"Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail)" <doao@chevron.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jeff.hanson@phaser.com>, "jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jnnc@chevron.com>, "john Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jbarthrop@electric.com>, "John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail)" <jleslie@luce.com>,
"Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail)" <jalamo@enron.com>, "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "'Michael Nelson' (E-mail)"
<mnelson@electric.com>, "Peter Bray (E-mail) (E-mail)" <pbray@newpower.com>,
"Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail)" <rschlanert@electric.com>, "Richard
Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail)" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "'Robert
Morgan' (E-mail)" <rmorgan@newenergy.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor Davis Announces Bill Package to Increase Renewable Energ
y, Distributed Generation and Co-generation

> The Governor held his press conference today at the co-generation plant at
> the University of California Medical Center in Sacramento.
>
> All local TV, print and radio news media outlets sent representatives.
>
> Although the focus of the news conference was supposed to be introduction
> of a legislative package promoting renewable energy, distributed
> generation and co-generation, it quickly turned to how the Governor will
> deal with the possible bankruptcy of the utilities.  The Governor said
> that it has "become increasingly obvious" to him that the best solution to
> the utilities' financial problems is the "acquisition of transmission
> lines."  He noted that the transmission lines are the utilities "most
> significant asset" and would be something the public would be able to get
> value from "in perpetuity."  He said the arrangement will likely be a
> "lease" of the utilities' lines, with the companies continuing to maintain
> them, "to capture [the utilities'] expertise."  Details of this plan will
> be announced on Friday, the Governor said.  The time and place for this
> announcement have yet to be released.
>
> The Governor later said he felt the utilities' parent/holding companies
> should "be part of the solution" so there would be "shared pain" in
> reaching a solution.
>
> The Governor said he suspected that acquisition of the transmission lines
> will involve the sale of revenue bonds, but he "didn't have enough wisdom"
> when asked about it to give a firm answer.  He said he believed he would
> have that wisdom on Friday.
>
> The Governor also commented on his plan to police and/or fine business
> establishments that keep their lights on after business hours.  He said he
> would announce a finalized plan on or around Mar. 15, a specific program
> to reduce by 50-70% the amount of energy used by retailers after-hours.
>
> The Governor did outline the legislative package designed to promote
> renewable energy, distributed generation and co-generation through
> incentives, rebates and tax credits.
>
> The package contains:
> 1.) "Rebate Increase Bill": "Emerging Renewable Resources Account of the
> Renewable Resource Trust Fund" = $50 million to increase rebates for
> renewable distributed generation systems smaller than 10 kilowatts (this
> money will come from the General Fund)
>
> 2.) Tax Credit Bill: SB 17X (Brulte): A 50% tax credit for the purchase
> and installation of renewable distributed generation systems larger than
> 10 kilowatts and up to 200 kilowatts for large facilities such as
> apartment complexes and businesses.
>
> 3.) Renewable Energy Loan Guarantee Program: AB 53X (Reyes): $50 million
> for a commercial loan guarantee program for renewable power systems,
> distributed generation and co-generation facilities.
>
> 4.)Retrofitting of Distributed Generation Facilities: This proposal will
> provide $20 million to achieve 40 MW of reduced peak load through
> retrofitting of natural gas distributed generation units at municipal
> water districts to improve environmental performance.  This involves
> retrofitting diesel and dirty natural gas generators with clean natural
> gas technology.
>
> 5.)Legislation to Exempt Microgeneration and Renewable Facilities Less
> than 1 MW from Standby Charges: Elimination of the standby charges paid by
> distributed generation end-use customers to the Investor Owned Utilities.
> This includes small co-generation facilities and only applies to units
> that generate less than one megawatt.
>
> ***********************************
>
> Please find the text of the Governor's press release for this news
> conference below:
>
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
> 02/14/2001 2:00 pm
>
> GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES BILL PACKAGE TO INCREASE RENEWABLE ENERGY,
> DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND CO-GENERATION
>
> SACRAMENTO
>
> Governor Gray Davis today announced a legislative package to provide
> incentives to power up more renewable energy, distributed generation and
> co-generation to help meet California's energy challenge.
>
> "By investing in renewable energy sources, clean distributed generation
> and co-generation, we can increase our energy supply without taking power
> away from the grid," Governor Davis said. "My generation plan contains the
> most ambitious renewable energy program in the nation."
>
> Distributed generation and co-generation are powerful tools for meeting
> California's power needs. These types of facilities reduce demand on the
> state power grid. They also provide energy independence from the
> Independent Systems Operator and the volatile spot market; advanced
> technology that creates jobs as well as power; and reliable energy sources
> that respect the environment.
>
> Governor Davis' legislative package for distributed generation,
> co-generation and renewable energy includes:
>
>
> 1.   $50 million to increase rebates for renewable distributed generation
> systems smaller than ten kilowatts.
> 2.   A 50% tax credit for the purchase and installation of renewable
> distributed generation systems larger than 10 kilowatts and up to 200
> kilowatts for large facilities such as apartment complexes and businesses.
> This will be carried in SB 17x by Senator Jim Brulte (R-Cucamonga).
> 3.   $50 million for a commercial loan guarantee program for renewable
> power systems, distributed generation and co-generation facilities. This
> will be carried in AB 53x by Assemblymember Sarah Reyes (D-Fresno).
> 4.   $20 million for retrofit of distributed generation owned by
> municipal water districts to improve environmental performance. This
> involves retrofitting diesel and dirty natural gas generators with clean
> natural gas technology.
> 5.   Elimination of the standby charges paid by distributed generation
> end-use customers to the Investor Owned Utilities. This includes small
> co-generation facilities and only applies to units that generate less than
> one megawatt.
>
>
> The Davis Administration will work closely with legislators to pass
> legislation to implement these proposals.
>
> Co-generation is the simultaneous generation of electricity and heat or
> steam, usually on an industrial site. Typically, the electricity is sold
> to the grid and the heat or steam is used onsite in the industrial process
>
> Distributed generation is a term used for a decentralized approach to
> generating electricity. Generally, the electricity is generated on the
> site where it is being used. It can include renewables (such as solar or
> wind power), fuel cells, and micro-generators.
>
> Governor Davis made his announcement at the UC Davis Medical Center
> Co-Generation Plant in Sacramento. The plant supplies not only all of the
> electricity for the but all of the heating and cooling, for the UC Davis
> Medical Center. It produces 26 MW of power. Since the Medical Center needs
> less than half of that, the excess power is sold back to the ISO, which
> pays the Center's utility bills.
>
> "The UC Davis Medical Center Co-Generation Plant is a self-sufficient
> facility," Governor Davis added. "It is an efficient facility. It is a
> clean facility. And it is the kind of facility that we need a lot more of
> to meet our peak energy demands."
>
> Governor Davis' energy plan relies on three elements: stabilization,
> conservation and generation. The Governor is working with legislative
> leadership on a stabilization plan for the State's Investor Owned
> Utilities. Over the last several weeks, Governor Davis unveiled an
> aggressive plan for energy conservation that will help reduce demand and
> keep costs down and a plan to dramatically increase the supply of produced
> and sold in California.
>
>
> ###
>
>


Ben,
These are the latest working copies.  The balance sheet is still not balanced.


Carl,

Thank you for your e-mail yesterday re the GISB agreement.   To finalize this
agreement we would  include the following  in our Special Provisions:

 GPU Service, Inc. is  authorized agent acting for and on behalf of Jersey
Central Power & Light Company, dba GPU Energy  (the "Operating Utility")
pursuant to the  Agency Agreement, dated________, by and between GPU Service,
Inc. and Jersey  Central Power & Light Company.

Buyer shall pay Seller the Contract Price regardless of whether the
applicable state public utility commission[s] allow for the amounts paid by
the Operating Utilities to the Service Company pursuant to the Agency
Agreement to be recovered in customer rates.  Furthermore,  GPU Service, Inc.
represents and warrants that: (a) the Operating Utility is duly organized,
validly existing, and in good standing under the applicable laws of the
jurisdiction of its formation; (b) the execution, delivery, and performance
of this Agreement are within the scope of its agency for the Operating
Utility pursuant to the Agency Agreement; (c) the Agency Agreement is in full
force and effect and represents a valid and binding obligation of  the
Operating Utility to accept and pay for the goods and services being obtained
by the Service Company under the Agency Agreement; (d) the Operating Utility
has all regulatory authorizations necessary for the Operating Utility to
legally perform its obligations under this Agreement and the Agency
Agreement; (e) the Operating Utility will be responsible for the obligations
incurred under this Agreement on the Operating Utilities behalf by the
Service Company as its authorized agent.

GPU Service, Inc. as agent for Jersey Central Power & Light Company has
obtained all necessary or appropriate consents, commitments, and undertakings
from the Operating Utility to assure the foregoing representations and
warranties.

Finally,  did I provide you with our Special Provisions? If not, please let
me know.    Upon your review of the above, please give me a call to discuss.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Jeff,

For a long time John and Mike have been letting counterparties who
accidentally click on the Gas Daily stack change the deals to NYMEX swaps.
The counterparty would let John/Mike know and then they would tell us.  In
addition, at the end of the month, we would get calls from settlements and
credit telling us (per the counterparty) that there were more deals that
needed to be changed from GD to Nymex than we had changed.  John would let
them change those deals too.

On Friday we changed some Jan. `01deals with Utilicorp that had been done in
late November to NYMEX swaps.  Because of the timing there was a P/L impact
of -$1.3MM.  When John saw this today he asked me what it was, I explained,
and he stated that what they click on is what they get.  I relayed this to
settlements and credit and that is why Kim is calling you b/c Reliant and
Utilicorp are 'upset'.  They claim that they have John and Mike on tape
letting them out of the GD deals and into NYMEX swaps.

We do not change the actual deals booked by EOL.  We book two new legs that
create a NYMEX swap and flip out the GD deal.

Errol


I thought you might be interested in reading this web page: I LOVE YOU!
http://www.cog7.org/ubbpub/Forum3/HTML/000068.html


Shelley,

By tomorrow morning I am pretty sure I can have the period Aug 2000 through Jul 2001 Cash In/Out reconciled (roughly) with the PNR and the large PPAs accounted for for each month.

Attached is what I have summarized so far.  Please go to the last worksheet tab called "SummaryCashInOutStats".  I have also finished summarizing within each month the total Cash Out qty and the total Cash In qty and priced each at the appropriate cash in/out price.  Since the imbalance quantities are broken out, the actual cash settlement per customer will vary some from actual as the cash in/out mechanism nets the quantities by customer first before applying a cash in/out rate to that customer.

Thx, Jim


--- Judy Cassidy <Judy.Cassidy@delwebb.com> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:47:46 -0700
> From: "Judy Cassidy" <Judy.Cassidy@delwebb.com>
> To: <vickistorey@yahoo.com>
> Subject: 401k
>
> Would you mind helping me with my 401k allocations?
> Can you and/or Geof take a look at my percentages
> and how they are distributed?
>
> The fidelity site that I access is:
>
> http://netbenefits.401k.com/
>
> my ssn is *********
> my password is *******
>
> I know I have 30% in blended fund investments, 30
> percent in bond investments, 40 percent in short
> term investments.  I don't know if this is good for
> me right now.  I also cannot figure out of the funds
> that I am in, which one is blended fund and which is
> short term investments.
>
> there is no hurry on this and I know you guys have
> your hands full right now...but I do worry about
> this as I am only 9 years away from retirement.
>
> judy c
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


Reagan,

I am still reviewing the numbers but here are some initial thoughts.

Are you proposing a cost plus contract with no cap?

What role would you play in obtaining financing?  Any experience with FHA
221(d) loans?

Although your fees are lower than George and Larry I am still getting market
quotes lower yet.  I have received estimates structured as follows:

  5% - onsite expenses, supervision, clean up, equipment
  2%- overhead
  4%- profit

I just wanted to give you this initial feedback.  I have also attached an
extremely primitive spreadsheet to outline the project.  As you can see even
reducing the builders fees to the numbers above the project would only
generate $219,194 of cash flow for a return of 21%.  I am not thrilled about
such a low return.  I think I need to find a way to get the total cost down
to $10,500,000 which would boost the return to 31%.  Any ideas?

I realize that you are offering significant development experience plus you
local connections.  I am not discounting those services.   I will be out of
the office for the rest of the week, but I will call you early next week.

Phillip


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/09/99 12:52 PM
---------------------------
From: HQ3.EM5:Bonnie Rushing AT PORTLAND_PO@CCMAIL on 12/09/99 11:02 AM
To: Tana Jones@ECT
cc: Carol St Clair@ECT, HQ3.EM5:Bonnie Rushing AT PORTLAND_PO@CCMAIL,
mime.m:eastraub@duke-energy.com AT PORTLAND_PO@CCMAIL
Subject: Good Morning!  Hope you are well and happy --

Date:  12/09/1999  11:02 am  (Thursday)
From:  BONNIE RUSHING
To:  Tana Jones
CC:  Carol St Clair;  mime.m:"eastraub@duke-energy.com" Subject:  Good
Morning!  Hope you are well and happy --

I could not find Susan's e-mail address in our system (go figure), so I
thought I would impose on you to forward this message to her, please.  Ed
Straub of Duke energy called today; they have signed the amendment and he was
not sure to whom to send the original.  To make things simple I asked that he
return it to me; I will keep the original and send a copy to Susan for your
files.

Ed asked that we send to him an electronic copy of the amendment.   Would you
please process that request?  His e-mail address is:
"edstraub@duke-energy.com".

Please ask Susan to call me if any questions.  Thanks bunch; and hope you and
all the ENA staff have a great holiday season!


Enron North America Corp.

	From:  David W Delainey                           07/12/2000 03:54 PM

Sent by: Kay Chapman
To: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Venita
Coleman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki
Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject: Re: QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream Origination

Well, we have a slight problem.  Mark has just replied to my memo and he will
not be in Houston on that date.  Could we make it for August 28, 2000 ?

Thanks,

Kay  3-0643

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  David W Delainey                           07/12/2000 03:40 PM

Sent by: Kay Chapman
To: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Venita
Coleman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki
Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject: QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream Origination

Dave and Mark have asked me to arrange a meeting, QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream
Origination, and I would like to know if August 22, 2000 from 1:00 - 5:00 pm
will work for all of you?

Thank you in advance for your promt attention to this matter.

Thanks,

Kay 3-0643