Mark

Thank you very much for your fast actions.  Our meeting with Sabre went very
well. I will drop off our signed original to Tana shortly.  I look forward to
meeting you soon.

-John Allario

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Greenberg, Mark
Sent: Thursday, April  5, 2001 5:27 PM
To: Steve Barry
Cc: Allario, John; Jones, Tana
Subject: Re: RESIDUAL KNOWLEDGE PROVISION
Importance: High

Steve -

Attached is what I have as the final version of the Agreement.  It is a clean
copy of the version forwarded to Enron by Brenda reflecting Sabre's changes
to Enron's 3-20-01 draft.  The only modification I have made is in Section 7
- Term.  Since we do not have Supplements attached to the agreement, this
provision needed to be revised to reflect a different method of calculating
the term.  I have provided for termination upon the earlier of (i) 2 years
from the effective date or (ii) upon 30 days written notice from one party to
the other.   In light of the fact that we do not have the Supplements, this
seemed to make sense.

Please take a look at the attached and confirm it is acceptable.  If so, I
plan on initialing an original and forwarding that document to our personnel
in the morning for signature.  Since they will be meeting with Sabre
personnel, I will be faxing it to them at your offices for them to sign and
have countersigned by Sabre prior to their meeting.  Since I will be in a
meeting out of the office tomorrow morning, I will be unable to address any
changes.  Accordingly, please let me know your thoughts as soon as possible.

Thanks.

 << File: sabre-NDAform(clean4-5-01).doc >>

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Steve Barry <Steve.Barry@sabre.com> 04/05/2001 04:10 PM 	   To:
Mark.Greenberg@enron.com  cc: John.Allario@enron.com, Tana.Jones@enron.com,
Brenda Crabtree <brenda.crabtree@sabre.com>  Subject: Re: RESIDUAL KNOWLEDGE
PROVISION

Mark, thanks for looking at the language.  Deleting the concept is fine.  If
you need another copy
of the draft, please let me know.

Thanks, Steve

Mark.Greenberg@enron.com wrote:

> Steve -
>
> I looked at the below language.  I guess I still have some concerns about
> the concept.
>
> Why don't we go back to your original suggestion and delete the concept
> entirely.  I am sure if either party believes strongly enough that a breach
> has occurred, it will pursue its available remedies.
>
> If this is acceptable, I will work off of the draft forwarded by Brenda and
> see if we can finalize a document for signature by Enron.
>
> Please let me know if this will work.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mark
> Senior Counsel, ENA
> Phone:     713-345-8897
> Facsimile: 713-646-3940
> E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
>
>
>                     Steve.Barry@s
>                     abre.com             To:     mark.greenberg@enron.com,
Brenda Crabtree
>                                          <brenda.crabtree@sabre.com>
>                     04/05/2001           cc:
>                     10:34 AM             Subject:     RESIDUAL KNOWLEDGE
PROVISION
>                     Please
>                     respond to
>                     Steve.Barry
>
>
>
> Mark, attached please find the proposed Residual Knowledge
> provision that we discussed.  If acceptable, please advise
> and I'll incorporate into the last version of the NDA.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This communication is intended solely for use by the
> addressee and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
> disclosure under
> applicable law. Unauthorized interception of this
> communication violates the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Any use,
> dissemination or
> copying of this communication other than by the addressee is
> prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please
> immediately notify the sender
> and destroy the original and all copies of this
> communication.
>
> (See attached file: 1_Residual knowledge clause.doc)
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------
>                                              Name: 1_Residual knowledge
clause.doc
>    1_Residual knowledge clause.doc           Type: Microsoft Word Document
(application/msword)
>                                          Encoding: base64
>                                   Download Status: Not downloaded with
message

--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This communication is intended solely for use by the addressee and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Unauthorized interception of this communication violates the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Any use, dissemination or
copying of this communication other than by the addressee is prohibited. If
you
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the
sender
and destroy the original and all copies of this communication.

 - Steve.Barry.vcf << File: Steve.Barry.vcf >>


Tana,

I had checked with Nicole Hunter before sending out the second e-mail as they
were counter-parties we were waiting on additional information on and didn't
have them prior to sending the first e-mail out. WIll try and send one a day
in the future. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks.

Aparna

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 4:17 PM
To: Rajaram, Aparna
Cc: Moran, Tom; Gerard, Camille
Subject: Re: Click Paper Approvals, 03-12a-01

Can you please send me only 1 list of Clickpaper counterparties per day.  It
gets very confusing for me sometimes to figure out what lists I should be
responding to when I get multiple lists.

	Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate 03/12/2001 04:09 PM 	   To: Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect  cc:   Subject: Click Paper Approvals, 03-12a-01

Please see attached.

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
ext. 5-4563


Hi Guys-
Just wanted to let you know that my hotmail account will be the best way to reach me for now.  Our company shut down last Thursday- so now I am out of a job.  Great time to be looking.  Anyways- it was a total shock and we were quite upset.  My parent company is trying to find something for me there- but its not looking too good.  If you hear of any leads-please let me know.  Also- anyones addresss that I missed- can you send them this way.  I don't have Amanda's, Lisa's, or Courtney's (work).  Also- I am not sure if I have the right address for Courtnie.  So- let me know.  I'll keep you updated.
Thanks-
Laura
My home # is 281.583.7820 and cell is 832.452.3247

ps- Hey Em- you busy?

Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here


Attached is my first try at our motion to extend time.  Your written comments
would be appreciated.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
04:27 PM ---------------------------

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 04/18/2001 01:47:19 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Texas Finance Festival

Vince,

Greetings.

Just wanted to drop a line expressing regret for my missing your Texas
Finance Festival (TFF) keynote address.  I would have enjoyed hearing your
views and catching up on things.

Regrettably, however, it appears I will be unable to attend this year's
TFF.  I look forward to seeing you again at next month's EPRM 2001.

Best,
Ehud

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Department of Finance
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


Attached for your review and comments is a draft of the Master Electric
Services and Sales Agm we've been talking about.  As discussed with Mike, I
used a combination of the Master Form that Mike has been circulating to the
business teams... and Mike's version of the Home Depot draft.  I've also
incorporated certain provisions that Wal-Mart asked to include in the gas
contract that Marianne Castano drafted.  You will see a number of provisions
bracketed and bold.  Pls give me your thoughts on those and
Wal-Mart does not like arbitration and we deleted it in the gas contract.
Have talked with Bob Williams our Enron Corp litig expert and says we need to
hold firm on keeping arbitration if at all possible.   Have kept arbitration
in the draft.
Mike S. and Jeff, Wal-Mart has the following standard provision it likes to
include:  "Non-Interference:   In exercising EESI's rights herein, we shall
not unreasonably interfere with your operations."   Normally we avoid such
broad provisions but we agreed to include in the draft gas contract and draft
metering agreement.  I did not add this to the draft.  Thoughts?
MIke S. and Jeff, any problems with keeping the Mutual Indemnity, Walmart
asked for indemnity in gas contract and we agreed to include one.
Mike S. and Jeff, any problems with Severability provision?
 Mike H. and Angela, do you want the Add Delete and Substitution provisions
that are in the draft (same as HD),
Walmart asked that we add a provision saying we'll use comm. reas. efforts to
mitigate Penalties in the Operational Change provision, I will add this to
the next draft.

Pls advise who at the Desk this draft should go to.

Below are the clean version, the blackline against Mike's HD draft and the
blackline against the Master form that Mike circulated to the business team
and lawyers 6-4.


Weather is bad here. Will be a while. If anyone asks just say I'm in Dallas and you don't know why. What a pain. Rick
Rick Buy
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Hi, Tom.  I'm up here working on the 33rd floor for Louise Kitchen again.  They've asked me if I can stay and help out for the entire day, and Ina said that it's fine with her (coverage-wise).  I'm actually working on Mark Knippa's and Gary Bryan's expense reports, and simply helping with phones and occasionally some minor things for Louise.  Let me know if you need me to do anything, or if you'd just rather me stay down there cuz ya miss me!!

You can also call me at extension 34220 ... that's the number where I'm sitting.

Laura


I have added directories with content:

\Capital
\Commercial Support Welcome
\EOL
\Planning
\Integration\Integration Costs
\Integration\Processes
\Integration\Systems Analysis

and some files to the directory:
\Background Info

Regards,
Richard


Steve at TCO's Gas Control approved the 32,000 overinjection.

Total STOI Delivery for May 2nd is 80,000.

Thanks.


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


We have parking with PNM for off-peak on Monday.  The energy schedule is as
follows.  The energy is at 4C but you should be able to move it to PV with
PNM if you ask nicely.  We will split the upside over $35 with ST SW via
annuity.  Please make all transmission purchases or other sales under their
book.

Deal number on the buy from PNM is #581199.

The shape of this length is:

HE1 50
HE2 50
HE3 50
HE4 50
HE5 45
HE6 20
HE23 35
HE24 50

Day total is 350.

Thanks
Bill


Attached is a originally prepared by Kent describing two potential deal
structures to move 2002 income to 2001 and/or to take advantage of a
forecasted near-term drop in the forecasted strip price for 2002.  Kent is
anxious to get feedback on these structures as he would like to lock-in
prices yet this week if prices remain favorable...so timeliness is essential.

Dan Fancler and I have both reviewed Kent's write-up and our "accounting
considerations" have been included in the attached memo.

If you would like to discuss this with us, Kent has asked to be included in
the discussion.  Your comments will be appreciated:


I'll check and advise.  Do you want to take him to lunch or who would be best to take him to lunch?

Liz

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shively, Hunter S.
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:31 PM
To:	Taylor, Liz
Subject:	RE: Thanks Liz

Interview schedule:

Do Greg and Louise want to interview?
John Lavorato
Hunter Shively
Dave Ryan
Jay Reitmeyer
Phillip Allen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Liz
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:32 PM
To:	Shively, Hunter S.
Subject:	RE: Thanks Liz

Hunter,

I spoke with Mr. Ricks about his flight schedule and he wants to drive because his wife wants join him.  I'll book him in the Doubletree Hotel for Monday.  I told him we would probably start the schedule around 9:00 a.m.  If you give me the names of those to interview him, I'll do the schedule.  I told him we would reimburse him for mileage.

Liz

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shively, Hunter S.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:13 AM
To:	Taylor, Liz
Subject:	Thanks Liz

Robert Ricks is a Lead Forecaster with the National Weather Service in New Orleans.  He is interested in coming in to interview for the position.  He indicated that next Tuesday or Wednesday would be the best dates for him.  He is working midnight to 8am for the remainder of this week.  He can be reached on his cell phone at any time...985-373-0608 or at home...985-875-0015.  His work number is 985-649-0429


Tana:

Stupid request but it's important to this CP -- please sent John Nugent a
revised form of NDA with  Enron Net Works LLC as the only Enron entity
(delete both ENA and EOL).  Then, I hope that he will review it.

Thanks,

Leslie

	Tana Jones
	11/15/2000 05:19 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NDA-Purchase Pooling, Inc.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 05:19 PM -----

	Paul Finken@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	11/15/2000 05:00 PM

		 To: jnugent@purchasepooling.com
		 cc: kihansen@cisco.com, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kara Knop/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Dovie Keprta/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject: NDA-Purchase Pooling, Inc.

John - The legal department informed me that the Enron NDA would be mutually
binding and if we worked from your Purchase Pooling NDA that it would take a
few days before they could review the document.  Is it possible to work from
the Enron NDA or do you or your attorneys have specific questions?

pf
----- Forwarded by Paul Finken/Enron Communications on 11/15/00 04:52 PM -----

	Tana Jones@ECT
	11/10/00 02:13 PM

		 To: jnugent@purchasepooling.com
		 cc: Dovie Keprta/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Paul
Finken/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: NDA-Purchase Pooling, Inc.

At the request of Paul Finken, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If the enclosed meets with your approval, please
mail or fax an executed copy to me.  If you have any comments or questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399.  My fax number is (713)
636-3490.


Attached is my current work report.

Samantha M. Boyd
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803
Houston, Texas 77002
Ph:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Cook, Mary; Gray, Barbara N.; Greenberg, Mark; Hendry, Brent; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson, Cheryl; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Heard, Marie; Jones, Tana; Panus, Stephanie
Subject:	Work Reports

Please remember to get your work report updates to me by the end of the day.

Mark Taylor
Vice President and General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street - EB3892
Houston, Texas 77008
(713)853-7459
(713)646-3490 (fax)


heffner a little bullish, eh?


We have the data
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


thats ok but now you owe me a drink


Just a couple of comments and questions:

Is it appropriate to refer to these as "US" transactions since the prices are
clearly from outside the US?  I recognize that ENA is the counterparty but I
think this may be confusing to our customers.

The term Business Day should be capitalized (it's defined in the GTC) [but
it's defined with reference to NY & Houston banks being open - does that work
for pulp transactions?].

I'm not thrilled with the language for the last ten days of the contract
period on the Pulpex description - is that what we use for current
confirmations?

In the definition of the Index for the Finnish product, the word "relevent"
should be deleted.

Dale Neuner on 01/25/2000 03:45:55 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Pulp Products

Mark

We have created two new Pulp Products, on based on the PIX, one the Pulpex.
PLease review and offer comments/approval.


Done.
Does it look good other than that (i.e. are your ready for executables?)

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Paul T Lucci@ENRON
	Sent by: Paul T Lucci@ENRON
	11/14/2000 11:40 AM

		 To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Confidentiality Agreement

Could you please change the reference to the ENA Global contract #33206000,
this is a Colorado Interstate pipeline contract # not an ENA contract #.  If
you have any questions please call me at (303) 575-6474.

Thanks
Paul


I am forwarding some Wall Street comments from Kathryn Corbally related to
the Transmission buyout.

Looks like they view it as very favorable - not a major hit against EPS tied
to full recovery of remaining undercollection.

Not sure yet if they incorporate the going forward - maybe SCE doesn't want
any merchant obligations?

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 08:18 AM -----

	Kathryn Corbally
	02/26/2001 04:47 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: CaliforniA

Jim, Have sent you three notes that show some level of support to activity in
California
- its probably a little bias since there are a few reports out there that say
quote the 'devil is in the details' and quote
'the odds of bankruptcty remain in the 50% range.'

Note1
09:42am EST 26-Feb-01 ABN AMRO Inc. (Ford,Daniel F. 212/258-1548) CPN DYN EIX
One Down Two to Go

One Down Two to Go
ABN AMRO -- Research Notes
Subject: Power
Companies Mentioned: CPN, DYN#, EIX, PCG, SRE

Analyst:  Daniel F. Ford, CFA  212/258-1548
          Po Cheng, CFA  212/258-1709
==============================================================================
=
Date:     February 26, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Highlights:
-  On Friday (2/23), Governor Davis triumphantly announced that the State of
   California and Edison International had reached an agreement in principle
   for the sale of its electric transmission system as part of a financial
   recovery package. He also commented that "good progress" was made with
   Sempra Energy and "some progress" with PG&E Corp.
-  The preliminary terms of the agreement call for the State to buy Edison's
   transmission system for approximately $2.76 billion (2.3x estimated book
   value) and allow for the securitization of "a substantial portion of its
   undercollection".
-  In exchange, Edison would: 1) make payments of approximately $420 million
   to its utility subsidiary, Southern California Edison; 2) commit the
entire
   output of an Edison Mission project at cost-based rates for 10 years; 3)
   provide cost-based rates from native generation for another 10 years; 4)
   give conservation easements on 20,000 acreas of watershed lands for 99
   years; and 5) drop a pending lawsuit against the California Public
   Utilities Commission.
-  We view this agreement as a positive development. Based on the 2.3x
   purchase price, the EPS hit from the loss of the transmission lines would
   be approximately $0.10 lower than our worst case estimate (at 1.5x) of
   $1.90 . The agreement, however, is not final and additional details need
to
   be worked out before being submitted to the legislature.
-  Events to watch over the next couple of weeks include: 1) a definitive
   agreement with Edison; 2) deals with PG&E Corp. and Sempra Energy; 3) a
   package that the legislature can accept (which could include concessions
   from generators); and 4) terms that are acceptable by the FERC.
-  In our opinion, the proposed deal is reasonable for EIX shareholders and
   renews the hope for a resolution to the crisis. While our optimism is
   tempered by the shortening timeframe, we are encouraged by the governor's
   recent statements, which have been more positive than negative. As such,
we
   maintain our Buy ratings on Edison International and PG&E Corp as well as
   on the generation companies: Calpine and Dynegy.

Other News:
In other related news, on Friday (2/23) Edison announced that all of its banks
have agreed to extend their forbearance until March 14.

Note 2

05:16pm EST 26-Feb-01 Goldman Sachs (NEWYORK) EIX PCG ACTION
EIX agrees to deal in principle with Gov Davis.PCG still negotiating.Buy
EIX...

                 Goldman, Sachs & Co. Investment Research

EIX agrees to deal in principle with Gov Davis.PCG still negotiating.Buy EI

*  On February 23, EIX and Governor Davis reached an agreement in principal
   in which the state would agree to buy the transmission grid and allow
   for recovery of a 'substantial portion' of unrecovered cost in return
   for EIX refunding money from its parent to the utility and dropping
   pending litigation.  This settlement appears to be a  reasonable 'shared
   pain' scenario and is consistent with the 'buyout vs. bailout'
   structure we have been anticipating. To be enacted the deal needs to be
   finalized and approved by the EIX board and the California Legislature.
   FERC also must approve the asset sale.
*  EIX agreed to sell a portion of its electric transmission system to the
   state of California for $2.76 billion and transfer $420 million cash to
   its utility subsidiary from the parent.  In return, the state would
   allow EIX to recover a substantial portion of its under-collected power
   costs and drop pending litigation in which the company is pursuing rate
   hikes.  If approved by the EIX board and California legislature this
   agreement, in concert with passage of ABX1-1, would eliminate the
   overhang that has depressed EIX shares.
*  Although dependent on several factors, we believe the net impact on
   earnings from the settlement will not be as high as the current EIX
   stock price implies.  We believe post-settlement EPS in 2002 will likely
   total at least $2.00/share, which supports a conservative valuation of
   $20 share (10X '02 EPS, a 20% valuation discount to the peer group).
*  Also late last week, PCG issued a press release indicating they had met
   with the Governor, had submitted proposals, and discussions were
   ongoing.  With the framework already established for EIX, we expect a
   PCG settlement could be announced in the near future. PCG's negotiating
   flexibility is limited relative to EIX because their generation rates
   are lower, their under-recovered balance is higher, and the potential
   cash 'refund' from parent to subsidiary being requested by the
   government is probably larger.
*  PCG's transmission system has a book value of roughly $1.5 billion.  At
   2.3X book value, these assets could potentially be worth $3.5 billion.
   Assuming a parent company to utility cash transfer proportional to the
   one proposed for EIX, we estimate PCG would refund $780 million. PCG's
   stock price also reflects an earnings impact more punitive than implied
   by a settlement of this nature. We believe a deal like this would
   support post-settlement EPS of at least $2.50/share which supports a
   conservative valuation of $25/share (10X '02 eps, a 20% valuation
   discount to the peer group).
*  Because EIX has a 'deal in principle' the stock is trading at a premium
   to PCG despite having lower potential 2002 earnings power. Those
   investors who believe PCG will strike a deal that is similar in
   structure and proportional to EIX's settlement should purchase PCG over
   EIX at this juncture.

NOTE 3

09:17am EST 26-Feb-01 Merrill Lynch (S.Fleishman (1) 212 449-0926) EIX PCG
UTILITIES-ELECTRIC:California: One Goes Forward, But Need All Three

    ML++ML++ML     Merrill Lynch Global Securities Research     ML++ML++ML
                             UTILITIES - ELECTRIC
                California: One Goes Forward, But Need All Three
                      Steven I. Fleishman (1) 212 449-0926
Reason for Report:  Governor reaches preliminary agreement with Edison; PG&E
up
in the air; Need all 3 utilities to move forward

Investment Highlights:
o    On Friday, Governor Davis announced a preliminary agreement with Edison
International (EIX; D-2-2-9; $14.69) on a financial resuscitation plan.  The
plan follows the basic framework previously outlined by the Governor.

o    The state will purchase Edison's transmission assets for $2.76B, or 2.3x
book value.  This would help pay off some of Edison's net $4.1B of
undercollections (a number agreed upon with the Gov.)  The remainder will be
recovered through a bond financing tied to a dedicated rate component to be
carved-out of Edison's rates.

o    In exchange, Edison will agree to: 1) Drop the lawsuit against the PUC,
2)
Invest $420M back into the utility from the parent, representing tax
overcollections , and 3) Sell power from its hydro and nuclear assets at cost-
based rates for the next 10 years.  Edison also agreed to sell power from its
unregulated Sunrise plant, currently under construction, at cost-based rates
for 10 years.

o    A number of uncertainties remain in Edison's deal, and it is still
preliminary.  The exact terms and language will be very important,
particularly
given the need to issue securitization bonds.  It is impossible to provide
exact earnings guidance based on this deal, but the only loss of earnings
power
would appear to come from lost transmission earnings (-$0.20-$0.25/share) and
potentially lower generation earnings depending on the terms of cost-based
rates.

o    This is a significant step forward for Edison and the resolution of the
CA
power credit crisis.  However, it could be for naught if the other utilities
cannot work out deals.  We believe Sempra Energy (SRE; B-2-1-7; $22.10) is
relatively close, but PG&E's (PCG; D-2-2-9, $13.70) talks were flailing last
week.  We continue to see little chance that this plan can move forward and
pass through the legislature unless all the utilities are on board.

o    We believe PG&E is willing to work a deal within this framework.
However,
the simple problem is that PCG's undercollection numbers are much bigger.  At
YE 2000, PCG's net undercollection was more than $5B and we believe this may
have reached $7B by the end of January.  Selling the transmission for 2.3x
book
would provide only $3.5B, leaving the other half to be recovered though the
dedicated rate component/securitization.  It may be that the only way the
numbers can work is with a rate increase.

Despite the significant hurdles that remain, we believe the momentum toward a
constructive outcome is improving.  To that end, we maintain our Accumulate
ratings on EIX and PCG for high rate accounts.


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/25/2001>, published as of 10/25/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


I'm good on this.  DF

Christine Stokes
02/01/2000 08:41 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Revised Contract Approval Request - Phillips Petroleum Company

TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CONTRACT APPROVAL REQUEST

Phillips Petroleum Company's discount letter was recently approved by
Transwestern's Officer group.   However, Phillips has now requested that
Transwestern include language in the discount letter which guarantees the
applicable discount rate in the event that Transwestern's minimum Tariff rate
were to be higher than the discount rate.  I have underlined the additional
language  in the attached revised discount letter (language will not be
underlined when provided to Phillips).  The inclusion of this language would
require Transwestern to file the discount as a negotiated rate prior to gas
flow under the term of the amendment.  Transwestern would file this discount
on January 31, 2001.

Please review the attached document and indicate approval via REPLY WITH
HISTORY.
All Officer approvals will be sent to Bill Cordes for final President Level
approval.


Sheryln,  I'm forwarding this to Daren to get your answer...  Daren, deal
141186 (El Sordo) volume 102....  deal 138605 (Torch) volume 343...  Megan
Parker thinks that all of this volume should be under Torch...  What do you
think?

---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Vaughn/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000
03:17 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sherlyn Schumack                           02/22/2000 01:15 PM

To: Kimberly Vaughn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: meter 986315 Torch Rally/El Sordo 1/00

Kim,
Have you looked at this yet?

---------------------- Forwarded by Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000
01:12 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           02/22/2000 01:00 PM

To: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: meter 986315 Torch Rally/El Sordo 1/00

Have you heard anything on this yet?  I need to pay it by Thursday.

Megan
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Parker/Corp/Enron on 02/22/2000
12:58 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Megan Parker                           02/17/2000 10:42 AM

To: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: meter 986315 Torch Rally/El Sordo 1/00

I have a volume issue with meter 986315 for 1/00 production.  The volume has
been split between El Sordo and Torch Rally.  I think all of the volume
should be under Torch Rally.  Please let me know if you find something
different.  The old months have already been corrected.

Thanks,
Megan


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000 02:25 PM -----

	"Rick Antonoff" <Rick.Antonoff@cwt.com>
	12/19/2000 04:30 PM

		 To: elizabeth.sager@enron.com, mary.cook@enron.com
		 cc: "David Mitchell" <David.Mitchell@cwt.com>
		 Subject: Three-Way Trade - Analysis

Attached below is our memorandum setting forth an analysis of our
conclusions with respect to the three-way exposure reducing trade we
discussed with you last week.

(See attached file: Three-Way Trade -- Analysis.doc)
==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or
disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are
believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened,
it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and
no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================

 - Three-Way Trade -- Analysis.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Arnold, Cheryl" <carnold@iso-ne.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:05 PM
To:	Arnold, Cheryl; Doot, David - DBH; McKenna, Edward; spmeyers@dbh.com; Gulluni, Maria; Frank, Robert
Subject:	RE: Estimate of The Enron Entities Daily Post-Petition Settlement	 Amount - Correction!!!!

Enron Power Marketing  $1,179,484 per day - Revised Amount typo below.

My apologies.

Cheryl

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Arnold, Cheryl
> Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:00 PM
> To:	Doot, David - DBH; McKenna, Edward; 'spmeyers@dbh.com'; Gulluni,
> Maria; 'Robert.Frank@enron.com'
> Subject:	Estimate of The Enron Entities Daily Post-Petition
> Settlement Amount
>
> Please find below an estimate by Company, of the Post-Petition amounts,
> accruing on a daily basis.
>
> Enron Energy Marketing  $61,941 per day
> Enron Power Marketing  $1,090,901 per day
> Enron Energy Services $178,875 per day
>
> These amounts are being sent as confidential information for the
> recipients.  They are only an estimate.
>
> Cheryl


Your just pissed because I was right about that recruit all along.
PL


For clarification, the "Vestas availability" you talk about is not specific
to Vestas nor is it based on any Vestas contractual availability.   This
availability is a multi- industry standard for simple "series component"
availability.   There is no credit for maintenance or repair time time which
is why a 3-5% loss is considered acceptable for long term performance.   The
3-5% loss includes maintenance.   An availability metric that shows the
turbine as available during repairs would be very objectionable to future
owners.    Pausing the turbine during maintenance may be acceptable if the
long term goal is set accordingly.   For example, if the turbine is always
paused during maintenance then the long term system goal should be close to
the 99.5% goal for grid availability.

Hollis Kimbrough
05/15/2002 07:40 AM
To: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Calculating "Vestas Availability"

Guys,

In an earlier e-mail Ben made the statement:  "Have you been able to
determine what these numbers would look like using Vestas' definition of
availability:  Hours of Wind Turbine in Operation mode X 100 / Hours of Grid
in Operation Mode."

We now need to develop a methodology to calculate the Vestas definition using
VisuPro data.  I think this boils down to:

Vestas Avail = (SOT+WOT+EST+RT+MT)/(ST-LOT)

Where:

SOT = System Okay Time
EST = External Stop Time
WOT = Weather Out Time
LOT = Line Out Time
DT = Down Time
RT = Repair Time
MT = Maintenance Time

ST = SOT+EST+WOT+LOT+DT+RT+MT

This calculation is based on an operating assumption that the current day
machines are placed into "pause" mode during maintenance and repair time.  As
a result the availability counters will continue to increment even when the
turbine is being serviced.

Let's get together and discuss,
Hollis


---------------------- Forwarded by John Griffith/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2001
03:46 PM ---------------------------
From: Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/25/2001 03:39 PM
To: John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Vitol Capital Management

John,

VCM is not an eligible swap counterparty.  Until established, we could
possibly face FERC audit if we opened them up prematurly.  We consider the
issue a high priority and will let you know when the guaranty comes in.

thanks
brant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Johnson, Rudwell
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Diamond, Russell
Cc: Griffith, John; Reves, Brant
Subject: RE: Vitol Capital Management

We (Brant) are currently working on a parental guarantee to provide credit
support for this counterparty.  Until this process is complete we will be
unable to set up this customer as a trading entity.

Rudwell.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Diamond, Russell
Sent: Tuesday, April  24, 2001 3:54 PM
To: Johnson, Rudwell
Subject: Vitol Capital Management

Big Bear-

The contact for the counterparty is Keith Swaby (713-230-1000).

Also, Please let the trader, John Griffith  x3-6247, know you are on the case.

Thanks
RD


Please plan to attend a meeting tomorrow(2/1) at 11:30 a.m. in Greg's office.  This meeting is requested by David Oxley and it will be regarding Netco employment agreements.

Tim-You can just call Greg's polycom number-853-5202.

Thank you!

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile


Looks good to me.

John Lavorato


I have continued the Hilcorp Old Ocean deal.  Dan Hyvl is writing up the
contracts for me and they should be ready Monday.  Terms are as follows:

Sept - Nov 2000
IFHSC + .02

Gas Daily for any mid month turn on as in our purchase contracts

Letter of credit must be approved prior to Sept 1 (they said they will have
it Monday by 2pm)

volume min/max is 7,000/day - 20,000/day with same tolerance currently
existing for swing.(we expect to level out around 10,000/d)

Please call if you have any concerns as we will continue this gas flow
without interruption.  Thanks,  Mary Jo Johnson


Here is the response from India, regarding the need to seek competition
authority approval.  As you will see, Jane's response focusses on registering
agreements, but her conclusion is that the focus would be at the Foreign
Investment Board.  Let me know if you need more.  mcs
-------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 04/06/2000 15:59
---------------------------

Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/06/2000 23:08
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc:

Subject: Restrictive and Unfair Trade Practices.

Nothing that I see on basic market power.  I think they would focus on the
FIPB requirements.

S.33 Registrable agreements relating to restrictive trade practices.  (1)
Every agreement falling within one or more of the following categories shall
be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to be an agreement relating to
restrictive trade practicews and shall be subject to registration. . .:

(a) agreement which restricts or is likely to restrict, by any method the
persons or classes o fpersons to whom goods are sold or from whom goods are
bought.
(b) any agreement requiring a purchaser of goods as a condition of such
purchase to purchase some other goods.
(c) any agreement restricting in any manner the purchaser in the course of
his trade from acquiring or otherwise dealing in any goods other than those
of the seller or any other person.
(d) any agreement to purchase or sell goods or to tender for the sale or
purchase of goods only at prices or on terms or condtions agreed upon between
the sellers or purchasers;
(e) any agreement to grant or allow concessions or benefits, including
allowances, discounts, rebates or credit in connection with, or by reason of
dealings.
(f)` any agreement to sell goods on condition that the prices to be charged
on resale by the purchaser shall be the prices stipulated by the seller
unless it is clearly stated that prices lower than those prices may be
charged.
(g) any agreement to limit, restrict or withhold the output or supply of any
goods or allocate any area or market for the disposal of the goods.
(h) any agreement not to employ or restrict the employment of any method,
machinery or process in the manufacture of goods.
(i)  any agreement for the exclusion from any trade association of any person
carrying on or intending to carry on, in good faith the trade in relation to
which the trade association is formed.
(j) any agreement to sell goods at such prices as would have the effect of
eliminating competition or a competitor
(j(a)) any agreement restricting in any manner, the class or number of
wholesalers, producers or suppliers from whom any goods may be bought
(j(b)) any agreement as to the bids which any of the parties thereto may
offer at an auction for the sale of goods or any agreement whereby any party
thereto agrees to abstain from bidding at any auction for the sale of goods.
(k) anyu agreement not hereinbefore referred to in this section which the
Central Government may by notification specify for the time bein g as being
one relating to a restrictive trade practice within the meaning of this
sub-section.
(l) any agreement to enforce the carryng ou to fany such agreement as is
referred to in this subsection.


The form of this confirmation looks good.  Is Dale amending the "auto
termination" provision?  SS

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jarrod Cyprow                           09/13/99 11:29 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: J.D. Irving N06566.1

I have attached the revised J.D. Irving deal that we discussed the ECT to ENA
name change. Will you please review it and let me know if everything looks
O.K.?

Thank you,
Jarrod


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 12:52
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           08/28/2000 08:59 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F
Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Randy Gay's Wife

Just in case you did not know, Randy's wife died last week. They will be
having services today and tomorrow.  However, in lieu of flowers they would
like donations for a playground in their neighborhood.  If you want to give a
donation, please bring it by my desk.

Thanks
Kimberly


HI, MELINDA! COULD YOU SEND THE DEAL NUMBERS TO THE RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES
CONFIRMS THAT NEED TO BE RE-FAXED. THANK YOU. JUDY


I am from the Associate/Analyst department and I am sending out this test email.  If you are no longer an associate or analyst, or would not like to receive future information please let me know, so that I can remove you from the distribution list.  If there is someone you know that did not receive this email please have them to email me.

thank you,

jc


I have not taken any time off this time period.

Thanks,
Robin


This one is pretty funny...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 06:09 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Patti Thompson                           01/10/2001 05:08 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Personal Trainers

Like you have time to read this... It is really funny.

PT
---------------------- Forwarded by Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
05:05 PM ---------------------------

Sue Foust
01/10/2001 03:43 PM
To: Karen Snow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda K Loukanis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn M
Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenda D Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julie Flahaven/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Thomason/NA/Enron@Enron, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Personal Trainers

---------------------- Forwarded by Sue Foust/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 03:32 PM
---------------------------

SHERRI SORRELS <ssorrels_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 01/10/2001 12:38:20 PM
To: Cyndi Alvarado <cyndi.alvarado@enron.com>
cc: Dee Yocum <day200@yahoo.com>, Lisa Murray <SLMHTX@AOL.COM>, "Diane
O'Brien" <CUDELZ54@HOTMAIL.COM>, SANDIE PIERCE <spierce@ppchouston.com>, Mary
Reed <mreed@us.amadeus.net>, Lisa Rudy <starme98@hotmail.com>, Jessica
Sanders <spedster14@hotmail.com>, Shelby Sanders <shelbywelby@hotmail.com>,
Crystal Schwartz <cschwartz_vitoltvl@yahoo.com>, Jan Skoog
<JSKOOG_VITOLTVL@YAHOO.COM>, TERRI SMITH <tsmith3@enron.com>, Lori Sorrels
<lsorrels61@yahoo.com>, Sue Foust <sue.foust@enron.com>, Gabor Fuzesi
<gabor@flash.net>, Cassie Gordon <GORCASS@LYCOMING.EDU>, Toni Gordon
<louise36c@hotmail.com>, Delores Harton <mistyblue_58@yahoo.com>, JULIE HUNT
<jhunt_vitoltvl@yahoo.com>, Joni Krizay <teddybear219@hotmail.com>, LORI
REYES <TXLORI@HOTMAIL.COM>, GINNY LYMAN <gdunn126@aol.com>, Joyce Lynn
<mlynn@enron.com>, Terri Maldonado <tmaldonado@statesman.com>, CRYSTAL
CAMPSEY <honeydew784@aol.com>, Lydia Cannon <lydia.cannon@enron.com>, Jolie
Carter <onensyncfan@knoxy.net>, Juanita Carter <redcarter@knoxy.net>, Karen
Ener <KDE@VITOL.COM>
Subject: Fwd: Fw: REALLY CUTE

> > This is dedicated to every woman who ever attempted to get
> >>    into a regular workout routine, (or use one of those Ab-Doer
> machines

> >>    Dear Diary,
> >>
> >>      For my fiftieth birthday this year, my husband (the dear)
> purchased
> a
> >> week of personal training at the local health club    for me.
> Although I
> >> am still in great shape since playing on my high school softball
> team, I
> >> decided it would be a good idea to go  ahead and give it a try.
> >>       I called the club and made my reservations with a personal
> trainer
> >> I'll call Bruce, who identified himself as a 26-year-old aerobics
> >> instructor and model for clothing and swimwear.   My husband seemed
> >> pleased
> >> with my enthusiasm to get started.  The club encouraged me to keep a
> diary
> >> to chart my progress.
> >>       Monday:
> >>    Started my day at 6:00am. Tough to get out of bed, but found it
> was
> >> well
> >> worth it when I arrived at the health club to find Bruce waiting for
> me.
> >> He is something of a Greek God - with blond hair, dancing eyes and a
> >> dazzling white smile.  Woo Hoo!
> >>      Bruce gave me a tour and showed me the machines.  He took my
> pulse
> >> after five minutes on the treadmill.  He was alarmed that my pulse
> was so
> >> fast, but I attribute it to standing next to him in his Lycra
> aerobic
> >> outfit.
> >>        I enjoyed watching the skillful way in which he conducted his
> >> aerobics class after my    workout today. Very inspiring. Bruce was
> >> encouraging as I did my sit-ups, although my gut was already aching
> from
> >> holding it in the whole time he was around.
> >>      This is going to be a FANTASTIC week!!
> >>
> >>    Tuesday:
> >>    I drank a whole pot of coffee, but I finally made it out the
> door.
> >> Bruce
> >> made me lie on my back and push a heavy iron bar into the air - then
> he
> >> put
> >> weights on it!  My legs were a little wobbly on the treadmill, but I
> made
> >> the full mile.  Bruce's rewarding smile made it all worthwhile.
> >>        I feel GREAT! It's a whole new life for me.
> >>
> >>    Wednesday:
> >>      The only way I can brush my teeth is by laying on the
> toothbrush on
> >> the counter and moving my mouth back and forth over it.  I believe I
> have
> >> a
> >> hernia in both pectorals.
> >>      Driving was okay as long as I didn't' try to steer or stop.  I
> parked
> >> on top of a GEO in the club parking lot.  Bruce was impatient with
> me,
> >> insisting that my screams bothered other club members.   His voice
> is a
> >> little too perky for early in the morning and when he scolds, he
> gets
> this
> >> nasally whine that is VERY annoying.  My chest hurt when I got on
> the
> >> treadmill, so Bruce put me on the stair monster.
> >>      Why the hell would anyone invent a machine to simulate an
> activity
> >> rendered obsolete by elevators?  Bruce told me it would help me get
> in
> >> shape and enjoy life.    He said some other shit too.
> >>
> >>    Thursday:
> >>      Bruce was waiting for me with his vampire-like teeth exposed as
> his
> >> thin, cruel lips were pulled back into a full snarl.  I couldn't
> help
> >> being
> >> a half an hour late, it took me that long to tie my shoes.  Bruce
> took me
> >> to work out with dumbbells.
> >>      When he was not looking, I ran and hid in the men's room. He
> sent
> >> Lars
> >> to find me, then, as punishment, put me on the rowing machine -
> which I
> >> sank.
> >>
> >>    Friday:
> >>      I hate that bastard Bruce more than any human being has ever
> hated
> >> any
> >> other human being in the history of the world.  Stupid,  skinny,
> anemic
> >> little cheerleader wanna-be bastard. If  there were a part of my
> body I
> >> could move without unbearable pain, I would beat him with it.
> >>         Bruce wanted me to work on my triceps.   I don't have any
> triceps!
> >> And if you don't want dents in the floor, don't hand me the &@#$*~
> >> barbells
> >> or anything that weighs more than a sandwich. (Which I am sure you
> learned
> >> in the sadist school you attended and graduated magna cum laude
> from,
> >> Bruce,  you Nazi bastard).
> >>      The treadmill flung me off and I landed on a health and
> nutrition
> >> teacher.   Why couldn't it have been someone softer, like the drama
> coach
> >> or the choir director?
> >>
> >>    Saturday:
> >>         Bruce left a message on my answering machine in his grating,
> >> shrilly voice wondering why I did not show up today.  Just hearing
> him
> >> made
> >> me want to smash the machine with my planner.   However, I lacked
> the
> >> strength even to use the TV remote and ended up catching eleven
> straight
> >> hours of the *$@#& Weather Channel.
> >>
> >>    Sunday:
> >>    I'm having the Church van pick me up for services today so I can
> go
> and
> >> thank GOD that this week is over.   I will also pray that next year
> my
> >> husband (the BASTARD) will choose a gift for me that is fun - like a
> root
> >> canal or a hysterectomy.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Suzanne Cox
> >Tenor Networks
> >6200 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 125
> >Greenwood Village, CO   80111
> >303 874-5153
> >303 874-5154 (fax)
> >
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/


Richard,

At an earliier time in the NSM cases, I thought that we might argue that Enron
simply had nothing to do with the A and B bond offerings, that ECT Securities'
name appeared on the cover but Enron did nothing else.

Whether or not that would be a good position to take, it is clear to me that
the evidence will not support it. Enron did a great deal of diligence starting
in June of 1997 and continuing well after it became an "underwriter" in
November 1997 (after which, among other things, Enron received and commented
on drafts of the offering documents and road show slides.)  While we could
argue that we were only looking out for ourselves, I have no confidence that a
jury would buy that; and, in any event, I think it would be very unattractive
for us to say that we put our name on the cover just to get a fee and never
did anything at all to fullfill the duties of an underwriter.

Instead I think we should contend that Enron did a hell of a lot of work on
this transaction, looking into many differesnt aspects of the deal, that Enron
believed what it found and was told, that Enron asked a lot of questions of
Schultes, Healsey, Stickler, and Busse, that Enron believed and relied on
them, and that Enron invested $30 million of its own money (more than the
plaintiffs) because Enron sincerely believed in the deal..  We know now that
some of the things in the offering documents and road show slides were not
right, but Enron learned that only five or six months after the investors,
including Enron, put their money in.

On the basis of our meetings, I have asked Brian to take some time to put down
on paper an itemization of what Enron did to investigate the NSM transaction.
A preliminary draft is attached.  I have asked Brian to go back and add names
of Enron and outside people involved in each of the analyses or investigations
that he has listed.

................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................
 - Enclosed.txt
 - nsmddsummary.doc


Tracy/Ed:

We are having some issues with NRG regarding financial confirmations.  We
have executed over 100 financial deals without problems but a recently hired
attorney has begun paying attention to the docs.  THE EASIEST WAY TO RESOLVE
THIS SITUATION IS TO PUT AN ISDA IN PLACE.  Could you please prepare credit
as soon as possible.  The Schedule/CSA should be sent to
david.adams@enrgenergy.com.  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


fear not o boisterous one.  you know that eggers is speaking in SF in the fall, right?

	Colleen Silva <Csilva@redsky.com> 07/10/2001 02:50 PM 	   To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: RE: hey whassup?

darling boy-

i'm never mad at you, never ever, and i really do adore you to death and
forever and can't bear the idea that we wouldn't be friends till death do us
part, and that i wouldn't be welcome in your life, so no, i was never mad
and don't even remember which of my (many) soliloquoys you may have
interrupted or are referring to but i do know that i have a rather
boisterous personality and perhaps i stepped on your toes and this is not my
intention and i adore you and my company is about to go under so the idea of
being unemployed AND having you upset with me is far too much for my
delicate self to handle...

xo
colleen

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject: Re: hey whassup?

i was never mad at you.  i thought that you were mad at me for interrupting
your soliloquy.

                    Colleen Silva

                    <Csilva@redsk        To:     "'jdasovic@enron.com'"

                    y.com>               <jdasovic@enron.com>

                                         cc:

                    07/10/2001           Subject:     hey whassup?

                    02:26 PM

you still mad at moi?

don't be....
-------------------------------------------------------------++

      colleen silva
      producer
      RED SKY       >san francisco
      v 415-633-2023
      c 415-336-2219
      <http://www.redsky.com>


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ????????????????????????????????????????+
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ????????????????????????????????????????1
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: ????????????????????????????????????????*
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

	Mtg. to be held today, July 23rd at 2:00pm instead of July 24 due to travel.

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
CARTER, REBECCA C               JAMES V DERRICK JR.             Nov 03, 2000
COX, DAVID                      KEVIN P HANNON                  Nov 08, 2000
OLSON, CINDY K                  STEVEN J KEAN                   Nov 10, 2000


<<ab_1890_bill_960924_chaptered.url>>

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/95-96/bill/asm/ab_1851-1900/ab_1890_bill_960924_c
haptered.pdf

 - ab_1890_bill_960924_chaptered.url


Sarah --

You're call on working with EPSA.  Get everything you can.  I don't understand how "new services" is moving fast enough.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	Network Plus Service

Jim and Christi:

Here is language I proposed to EPSA to be included in "Standardized Tariffs:"

FERC must eliminate the distinction between network and point to point transmission service and create a new "Network Plus" service that is the only firm transmission service offered and is available to all transmission customers.

Julie questions if this is what we really want (we being all of EPSA, including the generators).  Julie is nervous about proposing to eliminate point to point service all together.  She thinks the problem with network is that utilities are preventing generators from getting the service.  I told her that is not our issue, and just changing the rules so that network service is available to generators does not help us.

Julie suggested language that said something like "FERC should explore new transmission services for customers."  I told her that doesn't work -- we need to address this issue head on.  She is concerned that we're going to have dissention within the membership.

How would you all feel about retaining point to point service but making network available to everyone, with a much less restrictive sign up period (e.g. 1 month term rather than 1 year term), etc.  I think its cleaner to eliminate the two types of services and create a new "Network Plus" service that's available to everyone -- that would be the "firm" service and "nonfirm" would continue to exist.  Do you all think we would want to retain point to point service?  Even if we don't, if some EPSA members want to retain point to point service, we may need to think of ways to make network more user-friendly without eliminating point to point.

Let me know what you think

Sarah


Linda --

Pls put on my calendar.  Pls arrange a room and have Mike Roan and Luiz Maurer attend (also invite Kerry Stroup).

Thanks,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"ASHLEY BROWN" <ACBROWN@LLGM.COM>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 2:05 PM
To:	dennis.flaherty@cinergy.com; harvey.reed@constellation.com; Mfgildea@dukeenergy.com; rfahey@edisonmission.com; Steffes, James D.; Jim.mayhew@mirant.com; mina.turner@mirant.com; susann.felton@mirant.com; richard.doying@neg.pge.com; jcrowley@pwrteam.com; jorr@reliant.com
Cc:	Paul Connolly; nick.winser@us.ngrid.com; paul.halas@us.ngrid.com
Subject:	Alliance Generator-Marketing Group - Conference Call (4:30 PM EST) Wednesday, October 31

During its October 24 meeting there was a great deal of discussion at the FERC about the role of transmission companies and the possibility that some activities should be parrcelled out to other entities to perform.  National Grid intends, later this week, to file a white paper in response to those queries.  Before doing so, however, Grid would welcome the opportuity to discuss its filing with you.  We will try to circulate at least an outline of those comments prior to meeting with you, but given the FERC's time constraints we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.  I know that Jim Steffes from Enron has spoken with at least some of you.  Based on our converstion, we have set the conference for 4:30 PM EST on Wedensday, October 31.

Dialin number follows:

1-888-422-7101
Host Code: 957625
Participant Code - 377856

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================


-----Original Message-----
From: mitchell24@att.net [mailto:mitchell24@att.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:14 AM
To: Ben Natali
Subject: REQUIRED READING (fwd)

----------------------  Forwarded Message:  ---------------------

Who did it?     Foreign Report presents an alternative view

Israel's military intelligence service, Aman, suspects that Iraq is the
state that sponsored the suicide attacks on the New York Trade Center and
the Pentagon in Washington. Directing the mission, Aman officers believe,
were two of the world's foremost terrorist masterminds: the Lebanese Imad
Mughniyeh, head of the special overseas operations for Hizbullah, and the
Egyptian Dr Ayman Al Zawahiri, senior member of Al-Qaeda and possible
successor of the ailing Osama Bin Laden.

The two men have not been seen for some time. Mughniyeh is probably the
world's most wanted outlaw. Unconfirmed reports in Beirut say he has
undergone plastic surgery and is unrecognisable. Zawahiri is thought to be
based in Egypt. He could be Bin Laden's chief representative outside
Afghanistan.

The Iraqis, who for several years paid smaller groups to do their dirty
work, were quick to discover the advantages of Al-Qaeda. The Israeli sources

claim that for the past two years Iraqi intelligence officers were shuttling

between Baghdad and Afghanistan, meeting with Ayman Al Zawahiri. According
to the sources, one of the Iraqi intelligence officers, Salah Suleiman, was
captured last October by the Pakistanis near the border with Afghanistan.
The Iraqis are also reported to have established strong ties with Imad
Mughniyeh.

"We've only got scraps of information, not the full picture," admits one
intelligence source, "but it was good enough for us to send a warning six
weeks ago to our allies that an unprecedented massive terror attack was
expected. One of our indications suggested that Imad Mughniyeh met with some

of his dormant agents on secret trips to Germany. We believe that the
operational brains behind the New-York attack were Mughniyeh and Zawahiri,
who were probably financed and got some logistical support from the Iraqi
Intelligence Service (SSO)."

Mughniyeh was the only one believed to have tried it before. On April 12th
1997, he was reported to be only two hours away from achieving the highest
goal of any terrorist organisation (until last week): blowing up an Israeli
El-Al airliner above Tel Aviv. A man carrying a forged British passport with

the name Andrew Jonathan Neumann was in a Jerusalem hotel preparing a bomb
he was supposed to take on board an El-Al flight leaving Israel, when it
accidentally went off. Andrew Jonathan Neumann was very badly injured but
strong enough to reveal later to the Israelis that he was not British but
Lebanese, and that his operation was supposed to be a special "gift" to
Israel from Imad Mughniyeh.

'A psychopath'

"Bin Laden is a schoolboy in comparison with Mughniyeh," says an Israeli who

knows Mughniyeh . "The guy is a genius, someone who refined the art of
terrorism to its utmost level. We studied him and reached the conclusion
that he is a clinical psychopath motivated by uncontrollable psychological
reasons, which we have given up trying to understand. The killing of his two

brothers by the Americans only inflamed his strong motivation."

Experts on Iraq and Saddam Hussein also believe that Iraq was the state
behind the two terror masterminds. "In recent months, there was a change,
and Iraq decided to get into the terror business. On July 7th, they tried
for the first time to send a suicide bomber, trained in Baghdad, to blow up
Tel Aviv airport (Foreign Report No. 2651)."

Our sources believe that it will be very difficult to get to the bottom of
this unprecedented terror operation. However, they believe the chief of the
Iraqi SSO is Qusai Hussein, the dictator's son, and his organisation is the
most likely to have been involved.

Mughniyeh, 48, is a "sick man", says an intelligence officer who was in
charge of his file. He is considered by Western intelligence agencies as the

most dangerous active terrorist today. He is wanted by several governments
and the Americans have put a $2m reward on his head.

[Detailed list of Mughniyeh operations removed for Non-Subscriber Extract]

It was the assassination of one man in March 1984 that is said to have made
Mughniyeh the CIA's most wanted terrorist. Mughniyeh allegedly kidnapped the

head of the CIA station in Beirut, William Buckley. The kidnapping triggered

what later became known as 'Irangate', when the Americans tried to exchange
Buckley (and others) with arms for Iran. However, the attempt ended in a
fiasco. By one unconfirmed account, Mughniyeh tortured and killed Buckley
with his own hands.

A year later, in a combined CIA/Mossad operation, a powerful car bomb went
off at the entrance to the house of Hizbullah's spiritual leader, Sheikh
Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah. Seventy-five people were killed. One of them was

his brother. Hunted by the CIA and the Mossad, Mughniyeh hid in Iran.

In February 1992, Israeli helicopter gunships attacked the convoy of the
then head of Hizbullah, Sheikh Abas Musawi, in South Lebanon. Musawi, his
wife and children were killed and the revenge attack followed a month later.

According to press reports, Mughniyeh was called back into action and, in a
well-planned and devastating attack, his people blew up the Israeli embassy
in Argentina. The building was demolished and 92 were killed. Only last
year, after a long investigation, did Argentina issue a warrant for
Mughniyeh's arrest.

The reprisal for the attack in Argentina came in December 1994, when a car
bomb went off in a southern Shi'ite suburb of Beirut. Four people were
killed. One of them was called Mughniyeh, but to the deep disappointment of
those Israelis who planted the bomb it was the wrong one. Mughniyeh's life
was saved, but his other brother Fuad was killed. Mughniyeh waited for his
opportunity for revenge.

Our Israeli sources claim to see Mughniyeh's signature on the wreckage in
New York and Washington. How to counter this kind of terrorism? "To fight
these bastards you don't need a military attack," said an experienced
Israeli commando officer. "You only need to adopt Israel's assassination
policy."

Some interesting facts and info...

Subject: What's the Plan -- Patterns of Global
Terrorism 2000

Hello friends,

For those of you who I have not spoken to I hope with
all my heart family and friends are safe.  The victims
will not be forgotten.

I would like to engage all of you in a discussion of
what is to come.  Or perhaps I'm ranting you decide...

My first reactions like many others were decimation,
selected occupation, no more standing military, slowly
over the course of 30-50 years we bring these nations
into the fold of economic prosperity.  This has worked
before, but will it now?  On terrorism and
intelligence, I think terrorism is not to be treated
as criminal law; we cannot follow the diplomatic code
when dealing with terrorist organizations (i.e., our
intelligence should be permitted to assassinate these
people, or have moles on the payroll).

After a few days of kill 'em all mentality, I decided
to begin my education in this matter.  I would like to
share with you my first research and some impressions.
 I do feel more informed.  My resolve is no different;
but my initial general blood thirst is evolving into
something far more calculated.

Domestic and international terrorism has been a
horrible problem for as long as most nations can
remember.  There is on average more than one terrorist
event a day in the world.  In the late 1980's it was
as high as 2 events a day.
This is terrorism.  From Colin Powell himself.  I
found myself numb before I event got through the first
months of 2000.
 http://www.usis.usemb.se/terror/rpt2000/index.html
<http://www.usis.usemb.se/terror/rpt2000/index.html>

List of major terrorist organizations - they will all
need to be eliminated but I have highlighted the first
targets.
http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/tgpndx.htm#2000
<http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/tgpndx.htm#2000>
Start with Al Quida a focal point or umbrella
organization for a worldwide network that includes
many Sunni Islamic extremist groups such as Egyptian
Islamic Jihad, some members of al-Gama'at
al-Islamiyya, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, and
the Harakat ul-Mujahidin.

Al-Qaida - an terrorist organization almost run by bin
Laden, financially his network is like a holding
company.  Al Quida exerts heavy influence over the
four organizations listed below.  Each of the other
organizations in turn exerts influence over other
terrorist groups.  Most of these are fundamental
Islamic extremist organizations.  A fear is that a
general cohesive theme is to overthrow the
middle-eastern governments, establish fundamentalist
Islamic states which would persecute other religious
observers within their borders, wage war on western
influence internally,  and potentially engage in
military actions against the United States and other
western nations.
http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/qaida.htm
<http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/qaida.htm>

These organizations have signed a fatwa issued by bin
Laden in 1998 calling for the death of Americans.

al-Jihad (Egyptian Islamic Jihad.Islamic Jihad,Jihad
Group)
http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/jihad.htm
<http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/jihad.htm>

Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group) * killed Sedat,
has been terrorizing Egyptian government officials for
years.
http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/algama.htm
<http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/algama.htm>

Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM) *Sunni Muslim terrorists,
linked to Taliban and bin Laden, located in Pakistan
and the Kashmir province in India, maintain organized
terrorism against India, and Hindu culture in the
region.
http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/hua.htm
<http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/hua.htm>

Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) *Focused
primarily on terrozing its bordering nations, locally
focused with aspirations for eliminating western
influence, unchecked this organization will grow into
a world terror problem.
http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/imu.htm
<http://web.nps.navy.mil/~library/tgp/imu.htm>

Travel Warnings from the Department of State.
I like these links for the one-liner view of the
security conditions in these nations.
There is significant conflict and terrorism along the
Kyrgyz-Uzbek and Kyrgyz-Tajik borders.
http://travel.state.gov/afghanistan.html
<http://travel.state.gov/afghanistan.html>
http://travel.state.gov/tajikistan.html
<http://travel.state.gov/tajikistan.html>
http://travel.state.gov/uzbekistan.html
<http://travel.state.gov/uzbekistan.html>
http://travel.state.gov/turkmenistan.html
<http://travel.state.gov/turkmenistan.html>
http://travel.state.gov/kyrgyz.html <http://travel.state.gov/kyrgyz.html>

Geography - very good idea to look at maps of the
region.
http://www.randmcnally.com <http://www.randmcnally.com>
I found the geography interesting to study in detail.
Afghanistan is horribly difficult to access.  The
ocean-to-land access is through Pakistan's Arabian Sea
coast; then head North 800 miles, to Peshawar and then
into Kabul (the mountainous route the British used in
1946).  The Pakistan army is 50% Taliban sympathetic.
Already 42 political parties have issued statements of
opposition to their own government for offering to
help America.  They will descend into civil war most
surely.  The HUM will likely be a significant part of
that problem.  It will do us no good to partner with a
cooperative government and an uncooperative military.
Could American planes be shot down over Pakistan by
renegades within their own army?

Things we should know:
In Pakistan, many Afghan refugees were initially
trained by the US and Pakistan Intelligence (ISI) in
the 1980's to fight the Soviets.  They were called the
Mujahideen.  Many were children living in refugee
camps when recruited, having known nothing else in
this world.  Left to their own devices for 10 years,
these camps and training centers have given root to
terrorist organizations (HUM) and violently
anti-humanitarian fundamentalist movements (the
Taliban).  The Taliban gained control of Afghanistan
in 1996 overthrowing the then Shiite-Communist regime,
killing and hanging the president in downtown Kabul
for several days.  The Taliban are Sunni Muslim
fundamentalists and conduct a religious proletariat;
they terrorize other Muslim communities, the Hazaras
and Hindu Kush people within their borders.    The
Taliban recently issued an edict requiring Afghan
Hindus to wear identifications tags.  Sound familiar?
The Taliban is hosting Al Qaida, bin Laden's
organization.   bin Laden also influences the
fundamentalist (IMU) in Uzbekistan.  The IMU is
another Sunni fundamentalist terrorist group - they
are mostly involved in terrorizing Uzbekistan,
Kyrgyzistan, and Tajikistan, north of Afghanistan.
The Taliban constituents are predominantly from the
Pushtun region.  Pushtun covers parts of Afghanistan
and Pakistan.; There have been movements to create a
separate Pushtunistan.  This map indicates the ethnic
breakdown in the region.
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/pakistan_ethnic_80.jpg
<http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/pakistan_ethnic_80.jpg>
.
 And the HUM focuses their attacks on India.

The Shi'ite Muslims, many other Sunni Muslims, and in
general the world muslim community do not agree with
the Taliban's interpretation of Islamic law.  The
Taliban is not accepted by most of the Islamic world
because of their extreme harshness and treatment of
women, total eliminations of all modern culture, and
being the worlds largest heroin production.  The
elimination of western influence is not considered a
problem within some other fundamentalist groups.

Afghanistan is not friendly with neighbor Iran to it's
West.  Iran is an Shi'a or Shi'ite Muslim nation.
Because Iran is predominantly Shi'a; they are
unfriendly with the more radical Sunni dominated
Afghanistan.  Iran backs the ousted government and is
angered by Taliban terrorism and slaughtering of
thousands of Shi'a Muslims, including Iranian
diplomats in Afghanistan.  Iran also has border
disputes with Iraq further to the West even after a
devastating 8 year war.  Afghanistan and Iraq are both
25 million people; Iran is closer to 65 million.
An exchange from 1998 regarding Iran and Afghanistan.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/ops/war/1998/09/980910-afghan2.htm
<http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/ops/war/1998/09/980910-afghan2.htm>

Also during the war with Soviet over 10 MILLION land
mines were dropped in Afghanistan with no maps left
behind.
http://www.afghan-network.net/Landmines/
<http://www.afghan-network.net/Landmines/>

The only opposition to the Taliban is the Northern
Military Alliance.  These people are also Sunni Muslim
and ethnically are the Tajiks.  Their leader Massoud
was killed last week, assassinated by men posing as
the press.  The sliver of Afghanistan they still
control is the finger squeezed between northern
Pakistan and Southern Tajikistan and touching China.
The Tajik presence cannot be eliminated by the Taliban
without initiating conflict with Tajikistan.  The NMA
is a political authority that may be put in place.
They have offered 15000 soldiers, and 15000 more on
reserve.  Their leader was killed last week, most
likely in some coordinated effort - along with the new
requirement that all organization in Afghanistan need
to put monies in to the Afghan bank.  Many acts were
clearly coordinated in this event.

I have also been seeking out information on the
Taliban in particular.  These link contain some very
powerful information.  Quite frankly it is shameful
that the Western world turned their back when this
hellish situation was brought on upon Afghanistan many
years ago.

First a super high level overview - it is interesting
to note how many times this land has been ravaged by
invaders.
http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/asia/af.htm
<http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/asia/af.htm>

A brilliant article from 1996 ***** How could we have
not seen this coming!
Afghanistan's Taliban Rebels Blend Islam and Maoism
By Franz Schurmann
http://www.pacificnews.org/jinn/stories/2.20/960930-afghanistan.html
<http://www.pacificnews.org/jinn/stories/2.20/960930-afghanistan.html>

Not as well written but an interesting perspective
The Afghan Taliban: Like It or Not, It Occupies
Two-Thirds of Afghanistan and Shows No Sign of
Weakening
By Musa M. Maroofi
April 1998
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0498/9804047.html
<http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0498/9804047.html>

A Variety of Articles discussing the human rights and
in particular womens' rights violations of the
Taliban.
These people are Stone Age, truly.

10/13/1997
TYRANNY OF THE TALIBAN
Christiane Amanpour
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/1997/dom/971013/world.tyrany_of_the.html
<http://www.time.com/time/magazine/1997/dom/971013/world.tyrany_of_the.html>

This is very long and intense. *****
Buried Alive
Afghan Women Under the Taliban
by Jan Goodwin
February 27, 1998
http://mosaic.echonyc.com/~onissues/su98goodwin.html
<http://mosaic.echonyc.com/~onissues/su98goodwin.html>

Gender Apartheid - The Elimination of Women's Rights
*mentions American corporate interests.
http://www.feminist.org/afghan/facts.html
<http://www.feminist.org/afghan/facts.html>

Afghanistan's Forgotten Women
by ROB SCHULTHEIS
Updated 1/4/99
http://www.genders.org/g27/g27_afw.html
<http://www.genders.org/g27/g27_afw.html>

The Taliban: Believers or Enemies?
by Aisha Harris
http://www.geocities.com/forpeoplewhothink/Topics/The_Taliban.html
<http://www.geocities.com/forpeoplewhothink/Topics/The_Taliban.html>

More recently...

The 2000 year old Buddha statue incident - we should
have known...
The Taliban
Afghanistan's fundamentalist leaders
John Bowman, CBC News Online | May 2001
http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/background/taliban.html
<http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/background/taliban.html>

Women and the Taliban
by Azizah Y. al-Hibri
Published as an Op-Ed in The Philadelphia Inquirer
March 11, 2001
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/yahyam/page5/azizah.htm
<http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/yahyam/page5/azizah.htm>

This line is interesting.. *****
"Last week, the Taliban issued a commission to more
closely enforce those regulations and issued a new
decree saying that foreign aid organizations must put
their money in the Afghan State Bank. "  .... I ask
you is the Taliban more responsible than we think.
They have in
Feminist Daily News Wire
September 10, 2001
Taliban Tightens Restrictions on Foreign Aid Agencies
http://www.feminist.org/news/newsbyte/uswirestory.asp?id=5792
<http://www.feminist.org/news/newsbyte/uswirestory.asp?id=5792>

..and of-course the Saudi nationals
Feminist Daily News Wire
September 6, 2001
Arab Fighters Provide Support for Taliban
http://www.feminist.org/news/newsbyte/uswirestory.asp?id=5785
<http://www.feminist.org/news/newsbyte/uswirestory.asp?id=5785>

Try to digest this information - it is very important
that initiate an informed dialogue.  But the Taliban
must go.

This section is organized geographically based on the
waterways.
The nations in question will need to eradicate, expel
extremists from within their own borders.  This means
partnering with a United States led coalition and
contributing emphatically.

Look at the Mediterranean coast.
The South - Morocco, Algeria, Libya and Egypt are all
plagued by terrorism.
The East - Israel, Lebanon, Syria  all plagued by
terrorist groups.  There is a dreadful rooting of
terrorist organization.  Beirut was once a beautiful
city I am told; For 20 years it has replaced Warsaw as
the pop-culture reference to a war torn city.
Terrorism surrounding Israel ties into several other
organizations including Hizbollah and HAMAS.

Look at the Red Sea.
Egypt,Sudan and Saudi Arabia.  The Sudan is terribly
infiltrated; this may be the terrorist plan hatching
ground and safe haven.  And while the Saudi's are
economically partnered with the western world, many
extremists operating out of Saudi do fund these
organizations.  Sudan is also suspected of being a
meeting ground for the terrorist network.

Look at the Gulf of Aden - entrance to the Red Sea
Yemen - has allowed bin Laden to broadcast, site of
the USS Cole bombing.  After the attack, the
perpetrators fled from Yemen to Afghanistan.

Rounding the corner into the Persian Gulf.
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates - both
acknowledge the Taliban government.  They have
provided radical nationals to the Afghans, throughout
the years, many support the Taliban; some trained with
bin Laden.  We hope these governments have a change of
heart with regard to recognition of the Taliban.
Iran, Persia until 1935, has coastal territory along
the gulf and the Caspian sea to the north.  We have
had problems with Iran in the past; in the current
situation, they may be helpful maybe not.  There is
information pointing to an Islamic conference in
Tehran which is another possible "hatching" ground for
these operations.  Iran still may be a very serious
issue in the future.  It is a religious government -
something we all implicitly abhor in this nation.
They exiled the Shah and began systematically
eliminating western influence from their society after
the event in 1979
Iraq - Part of the Ottoman empire through 1932.
Kurdish territory in the North bordering on Turkey.
Hussein has used Sarin nerve gas against his own
nationals, the Kurds in the North near the Turkish
border.  As we know, he has invaded Kuwait.  An 8 year
war with Iran over borders was going on at the same
time the soviets were in Afghanistan.  This is a
military regime.  Though the economic sanctions we
have used for the last 10 years have kept Iraq down as
military force; they have created a new generation of
hatred.

East from the Gulf into the Arabian Sea, part of the
Indian Ocean, the Arabian basin is separated from the
Indian Ocean by underwater land structure but there is
nothing to prevent sea travel.
Pakistan - a country on the verge of civil war.  A
military regime. Probably half of the people in the
army are Taliban sympathizers.  Pakistan may be in
civil war shortly.
India - the largest democracy in the world.  Still
disassembling the 3500 yr old Caste System.  The
British occupation left India with an intact system of
representative government.  They are plagued by
internal strife from the Sikh, who are separatists.
Their brand of terrorism has been significantly
reduced in the past 8 years.  They are also plagued by
the HUM another extremist fundamental Islamic movement
- very closely connected to the Taliban and bin Laden
as described earlier.

China actually shares a thin strip of border with
Afghanistan near Tajikistan.  Pakistan also borders on
China.  Though the Himalayas separate the bulk of this
geographically from the 1 billion people of China.
Having China on board is critical.

I would like the US to investigate TSI, Telephone
Services International, a New Jersey Corporation and
Unocal, a California Oil Company.  Both of these
companies have had business dealings with the Taliban
government.  I believe that corporate greed with total
disregard for the human condition in any country is
unacceptable and should be uncovered and dealt with
accordingly.  And I think the investment community
needs to demonstrate in the markets to corporations
who dabble in business with terror linked
organizations.  The investment community was hit
particularly hard; i hope going forward there will be
a clear message to stop support for companies who may
potentially aggravate terrorists to attack Americans.
We may need to legally restrict what our corporations
can do abroad and who they are allowed to strike deals
with based on the opportunity cost of potential
terrorist activity.  By all means, no corporation
should have had any business dealings with the
Taliban; perhaps this should be enforced by law.

Some rants about waking the sleeping giant MIND!
I firmly believe that the deadened state of
intellectual discussion concerning these issues in
America is part of the problem.
We have been funneling our best minds into Technology,
Banking, Law and Medicine for a very long time.  The
general lack of information and interest in world
political and human conditions, and the evolution of
human governments is dangerous.  The average American
simply need to be more informed and have an opinion to
express to our government on what we can do to ensure
the survival of our way of life and the spread of
goodwill.

Most likely we are all in agreement that a forceful
military strike will initiate this new campaign;  I
think there is quite a bit of confusion over what we
really are about to embark on.  Our army may well
include the corporate army and the casualties will be
civilian.  We need to get every American to study this
condition, it's roots, causes, directions and what we
can do to end it.  Americans need to start an
intelligent dialogue, around the country publicly so
that we can demonstrate to ourselves and the rest of
the world that we are educated and serious about
achieving a solution.  Our military domination is
already known throughout the world.

Perhaps our long-term goal may involve bolstering the
middle-class communities in these nations assuming
they are moderate, tolerant and peace-loving; they
need something to lose, and conversely, something to
protect.  To get there we will need to eradicate any
fundamentalist governments like the Taliban, under no
circumstances can they be trusted going forward ever.
We will need to partner with each nation and hunt the
terrorist organizations down within their borders.  We
need to seize assets, disable communications, engage
in an unprecedented Intelligence campaign.

Let's focus our efforts on thinking and providing our
leadership with a collective strategy and wisdom, an
opinion from within.  While I trust the powers that be
to handle these affairs,  I never believed any day in
my life that we were so vulnerable.

Know the enemy. The threat of bio-chemical weapons - a
simple overview of what the most likely agents are.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/deadlygas0210.html
<http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/deadlygas0210.html>

There is one company in America that is contracted by
the DOD to produce the Anthrax vaccine, the BioPort
Corporation, formerly known as the Michigan Biologic
Products Institute (MBPI).  I hope the defense around
that company is solid.

Hopefully, this will generate some interest in
developing a public discussion regarding strategies
for the eradication of terrorism and governments that
support them actively, tacitly or otherwise.  bin
Laden  Imad Mughniyeh, head of the special overseas

operations for Hizbullah, and the Egyptian Dr Ayman

  Al Zawahiri, senior member of Al-Qaeda and possible

and the Taliban should go first, then perhaps
the other organizations mentioned above.  Then what
Hussein, Qaddafi?  Will Egypt be on board when the Al
Jihad unleash terror in Egypt?  Do these nations host
silently in exchange for less or no terrorism within
their borders, completely bending to the will of
terrorists for fear of their people being injured?  Is
that support or a successful campaign of terror? Where
do we draw the line?  I suppose where you stand after
Tuesday is a good start?  Who's next?  How do we
prioritize? Will they are be lined up behind the US in
1 year?

Be strong,  Be prepared, Be smart, Be heard, God Bless
America
__________________________________________________

######################################################################
This e-mail and the information it contains may be privileged and/or
confidential.
It is for the intended addressee(s) only.  The unauthorised use, disclosure or
copying of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited and could,
in certain circumstances, be a criminal offence.  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this message immediately.

Please note that Spectron does not enter into any form of contract by means of
internet e-mail.  None of the staff at Spectron are authorised to enter into
contracts on behalf of Spectron in this way.  All contracts to which Spectron
is a party are to be documented by other means.

Spectron Group Ltd
Liscartan House
127 Sloane Street
London SW1X 9BA

Tel: 02078234646
Web Site: http://www.spectrongroup.com
######################################################################


I hope I have the right Bob Hall.  I'm trying to get sitara access to the West and Texas Desk and they have not been approved yet.  I'm waiting for Phillip Love (now with UBS) to approve the West and O'Neal Winfree (not sure who this is) to approve the Texas Desk.

Tommy Yanowski was able to help with a couple of these but it looks like we need to get the approving parties changed.

I also left a message for the help desk about this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quezada, Daniel
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:52 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	FW: Request Submitted: Access Request 000000000083213

	You were not given access to AEP.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:33 PM
To:	Quezada, Daniel
Subject:	Request Submitted: Access Request 000000000083213

This resource request has been rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000083213&Page=MyReq.

Request ID          : 000000000083213
Approver Type       : Data
Signature           : tommy.j.yanowski@enron.com
Comments            : Chris should have access to Enron Estate portfolios only.  He should not need access to any AEP portfolios.
Request Create Date : 2/20/02 3:28:38 PM
Requested For       : chris.germany@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production AEP Edit Trader
Resource Type       : Applications