No change in cash at this time.  Agreement will provide for netting and set-off only upon an event of default in an underlying agreement.  Cash in/out will depend upon positions at that time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:58 AM
To:	Schneider, Chip; Bradford, William S.; Boots, Kelly H.
Cc:	Buy, Rick; Murphy, Harlan; St. Clair, Carol; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: BNP Paribas Master Netting Agreement

What does this mean in terms of money in/out?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schneider, Chip
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Bradford, William S.; Boots, Kelly H.
Cc:	Buy, Rick; Murphy, Harlan; St. Clair, Carol; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	BNP Paribas Master Netting Agreement

	We are moving ahead with finalizing a Master Netting Agreement that will cover all physical and financial agreements between BNP Paribas and Enron, except for the exchange agreements pertaining to NYMEX and LME trading.  The agreements to be included under this arrangement are listed below.  The intent is to complete the agreement by close of business on Tuesday, November 27.  We have communicated this to Bart Schouest at BNP Paribas and to BNP Paribas' counsel in New York.

1.	ISDA Master Agreement dated effective as of  June 28, 1995 between Enron North America Corp., formerly Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp., and BNP Paribas, formerly Banque Paribas (as the same may have been or may be amended, restated, supplemented of otherwise modified from time to time, and including all Transactions, schedules, annexes, and confirmations thereunder, collectively).

2.	Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Agreement dated effective as of January 16, 1992 between Enron Corp. and BNP Paribas, formerly Banque Paribas.

3.	ISDA Master Agreement dated effective as of  February 22, 2000 between Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp. and BNP Paribas.

4.	ISDA Master Agreement effective as of April 4, 2000 between Enron Credit Limited and BNP Paribas.

5.	General Terms & Conditions governing transactions executed between Enron Capital & Trade Resources Limited and BNP Paribas.

6.	General Terms & Conditions governing online transactions executed between Enron Capital & Trade Resources Limited and BNP Paribas for the Sale and Purchase for Flat UK Beach Trades.

Please address any questions or concerns to me ASAP.

Regards,

Chip


Dana,

Thank you for the encouragement.  I know God is working and He is taking us
to higher heights in Him.  I am excited about how He is transforming me in
all of this.  I am not perfect, still have many faults, but I glad He loves
me in spite of myself.

XOXOX
Bonnie


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

December 08, 2000 5:00pm through December 11, 2000 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

EI:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: HR   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: UNIX     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: REMEDY
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  RmailSniffer
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Review of Mail logs has shown that between 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.
50% of mail messages fail.  The update will copy failed messages to another
directory for an admin to process.
Backout: Reset RmailSniffer service to original settings.
Contact(s):  Carlos Perez    713-345-708
  Christian Smerz   713-345-7410

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]


Put this on Kevin's review...THAT HE HELP YOU ANSWER QUESTIONS IN THAT
MEETING WITH SARA BOLKEN (MILLICAN & ASSOC.), THE ARCHIVE GROUP.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 09:52 AM
---------------------------

"perfmgmt@enron.com"<perfmgmt on 11/02/2000 08:13:14 AM
To: dana.davis@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Year End 2000 Performance Feedback

NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
JOLLY, KEVIN                    MARNIE LAMB                     Oct 31, 2000


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/29/2000 10:10
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           08/29/2000 09:57 AM

To: Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Herron/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Matthew F
Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron/VEPCO CEC

Here's the current redline, incorporating most of the comments made last
week.

Herman, the language to address your biggest issue is in 2.3, page 7 on the
marked version.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/29/2000 09:51
AM ---------------------------

"David Parr" <dparr@bracepatt.com> on 08/28/2000 01:12:54 PM
To: <heather.kroll@enron.com>, <kay.mann@enron.com>, <ozzie.pagan@enron.com>
cc: "Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com>

Subject: Enron/VEPCO

Attached please find the latest version o fthe VEPCO agreement.  I have also
attached a version that has been processed through CompareRite against Kay's
August 15th version.

Feel free to call Nancy with questions and comments on 202-828-5862.

D. David Parr, Jr., Esq.
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C.  20006-1872
202-828-5800 Telephone
202-857-2122 Facsimile

 - CLEAN VEPCO PPA.doc
 - COMPARERITE VEPCO PPA.rtf


----- Forwarded by Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 12:52 PM -----

	Lee_Hileman@eogresources.com
	07/13/2000 12:32 PM

		 To: Genia.FitzGerald@enron.com, mwilson@elfexp.com, sdarne@elftrad.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cute

(See attached file: You(1).exe)

 - You(1).exe


Paul- when will your review of the language be complete.  This language has
been given to outside counsel to incorporate in the world hunger standard.
Please keep in mind that in this case the contracting party is a vendor whose
job is manufacture the equipment and deliver it to the site, the vendor is
not involved in the construction other than providing technical direction of
installation.

Paul-  we need to talk- I thought I heard that the 7FA' are not considered
new technology.  I need to hear this from you, David  and Wortham before
opening up the subject of collateral damage and allowing the insurer to
subrogate.  I do not understand your comment on your naming the vendor as an
additional insured.  We are doing so in the case of Arcos.  What we are doing
in Arcos is making the vendor responsible under its warranty obligations for
colleteral damage.

I need to have a very clear understanding of what we can and cannot do it the
case of GE 7FA units.  Deviating from the past practice on 7FA's where there
is not a new technology issue will be a painful and expensive ordeal.

I can be reached in London  via Scott Dieball's cell phone 713-504-2742.
Please call.

	Paul E Parrish/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/16/2001 03:56 PM

		 To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt
		 cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Marshall/ENRON@enronXgate, James L Bouillion/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: INSURANCE EXHIBIT FORTURBINE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

John:
The changes I suggested on the watercraft wording are still being reviewed
for completeness. I think what I gave you will work for most situations where
the watercraft is incidental to the work or is far removed from our being
involved [contractor to sub to sub contractor] but it does not address every
situation that we could be involved in. We may need to expand our wording
accordingly.

Likewise, your question on giving to the turbine venders the waiver of
subrogation and additional insured is an even bigger concern. You are asking
us to obligate ourselves in providing waiver and additional insured status to
GE which we cannot do.   As you know, we went many years with providing
turbine venders protection under the insurance because the market was soft
and underwriters agreed to it. Now they balk at giving it because of the
losses they have incurred and we cannot predict what they will agree to. It
does not matter if the machines are proto-type or not, there is a good chance
right now that they will not agree to insuring the vender. Everyone says it
only takes money and in many cases we could probably include venders on the
insurance but I cannot recommend committing to it in a long term contract )
we have to arrange the insurance at the time we need it in order to determine
if it is available.

If you need to have some language in the agreement, I would recommend that we
not give the waive and additional insured to GE or any vender. When we need
the insurance and begin placing it, we can then determine if the underwriter
will cover the vender and ask for a price reduction from GE to move their
risk to the underwriter.

I am sorry I cannot make this easier but that is the nature of the insurance
beast.
Paul


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000
05:06 PM ---------------------------

KhairuddinBMJaafar@petronas.com.my on 12/12/2000 12:45:38 AM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Apology

Dear Sir,

I would like to apologize for the mistake in my previous email. Please find
the copy of the letter mentioned earlier in this email. Again,  I'm sorry
for the inconvenience.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,

Khairuddin Jaafar

(See attached file: Enron.lwp)

 DISCLAIMER  : This e-mail and any files transmitted with it ("Message")
 is  intended  only  for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may
 contain  confidential  information.   You  are hereby notified that the
 taking  of  any action in reliance upon, or any review, retransmission,
 dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this Message or any
 part thereof by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
 prohibited.  If  you  have  received  this Message in error, you should
 delete this Message immediately and advise the sender by return e-mail.
 Opinions, conclusions and other information in this Message that do not
 relate  to  the official business of PETRONAS or its Group of Companies
 shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by PETRONAS or any of
 the companies within the Group.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic25324.pcx)
 - Enron.lwp
 - pic25324.pcx


All the gas stocks getting hammered.  Natural gas is bursting at the seams.  Your bill should go way down

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:19 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	Thanksgiving

I ordered the pies for our big Thanksgiving day feast at Jeanies.  Wish
you could be there.  Dad is bringing the beer, he said one  12 pack
would do, I told him to bring a case, just in case someone wants more
that one can. I know that Joan is not coming to dinner.  Should we
invite her to Christmas or wait for her to call.    If you ever talk to
her, you may want to mention that her father is still alive and lives in
the same house that she was raised in.  I hope she comes for Christmas.
If she doesn't, I doubt that I will ever invite to anything again.  But
that is that fucking Links "better that everybody else"attitude.   I
might just turn that sideways and stick it up his German ass.  Hey our
stock is going up, how bout yours?


Dear Ken,

I'd like to thank you for your continued participation in this project.

I thought it would make sense to quickly recap where we are following last
week's meeting.

1. We will redraft the report to reflect several trains of thought.  We
will, for example, express a greater appreciation for the fact that there
are major problems with the current financial reporting framework, a big gap
between GAAP and the real world in which investors must make their
judgements.  We will devote much more attention to the issue of intangibles,
including the need for a common language to describe them.  We will
elaborate on the issue of the environment for disclosure, suggesting that we
need a way of thinking about the concept of safe harbor, one which is based
on the notion that the way to protect investors amid so much uncertainty is
to make it easier for companies to provide forward looking information,
knowing that no one can be fully confident of any projections these days.
We will be much bolder in recommending several groups - the SEC, FASB,
institutional investors - take a much greater interest in the deficiencies
of the reporting model and ask the questions, commission the studies, etc.

All of this will still be within the framework of the spirit of the last
draft - that is, we're against more regulation at this time, against
prescriptive one-size-fits-all mandates, etc.  And we believe that the
market is forcing disclosure already - but maybe not quickly or
comprehensively enough.

2. Some of the panel members will have supplementary views.  Can you
begin to put pen to paper now?  Here is my speculation as to who may want to
say what:

* Len Baker and Rob Glaser may wish to write something on the recent
"Fair Disclosure" decision.  I sense that Dennis Powell might wish to join.
Len, can you take the lead?  I'd suggest no more than one page, preferably
half a page.

* John Neff may wish to express skepticism about the value of
developing a new language for intangibles.

* John Doerr and Len Baker may wish to say something about accounting
for pooling or stock options.  Again, please keep it very short.  John, can
you take the lead?

If anyone else is thinking about a supplementary view, please let me know.
We would appreciate these submissions by October 15.

3. Future Schedule.  We agreed to "get it right" and not to stop until
we do.   The next steps, it seems to me are:

* Get you a new draft
* Get your views either in a meeting or conference call to be
scheduled
* See where we are then

However, I'd like to suggest that we aim to finish this report by December
15, 2000 if at all possible.

Please let me know if I've missed anything or if you have additional ideas.

Best regards,
Jeff


More re  Canary
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 11:31
PM ---------------------------

Rick Johnson@ENRON
12/05/2000 10:08 AM
To: Finley Biggerstaff/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathy Neal/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del
Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, <dcrawford@davis.ca>
Subject: Re: Project Canary Labor and Employment Request

Finley,  I haver made two additions to the labor  and employment document
request, Items # 16 & 17.  I have also expanded the scope of request # 4.
Please see attached - rev1.

Thanks Rj.

To: Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Neal/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Project Canary Labor and Employment Request

Rick,
Per my voicemail, attached is a request list Davis & Company has already
submitted.  If you have additional items please let me know.  Thanks,

Finley

---------------------- Forwarded by Finley Biggerstaff/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000
07:35 PM ---------------------------
From: Peter del Vecchio on 12/04/2000 06:56 PM
To: Finley Biggerstaff/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: ENRON

----- Forwarded by Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 06:56 PM -----

	"Dean Crawford" <dcrawford@davis.ca>
	12/04/2000 06:52 PM

		 To: <pdelvec@ect.enron.com>
		 cc: "Brian Hiebert" <BFH@davis.ca>
		 Subject: Fwd: ENRON

Mr. Del Vecchio,
?
I am working with Brian Hiebert in our due diligence work  regarding Celgar.
Brian has asked me to forward to you the attached list of  materials I
requested from Celgar on Friday. The letter and list is attached to  the
email from my secretary that I am forwarding to you.
?
Doug Cargill's office has just advised me they were able to  put together all
of the materials today, but the courier package will not arrive  until
Wednesday morning. They are sending me by fax some of the materials this
evening.
?
?
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:39:13 -0800
From: "Lynn Scrivener" <lscrivener@davis.ca>
To: "Dean Crawford" <DCC@davis.ca>
Subject: ENRON
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_13480851.ED8CE7A1"

 - LT Cargill.doc
 - Attachment Cargill.doc


Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort

Trade Count:
 180  Trades
 8.56  Million Barrels
  6  Counterparties Transacting Today
 27 Counterparties Transacting to Date


Can't make it but thanks for the offer.  I do plan on coming up some time
this year.

"Germany, Mary/COR" <mgermany@CH2M.com> on 07/26/2000 09:53:36 AM
To: "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: rafting update

Hey if you want to come up the weekend of the 12th we are going rafting at
the Royal Gorge.

Mary Germany, Manager
Accounts Payable
Payroll
Accounting Support
(303) 713-2151
fax (303) 846-2151
email - mgermany@ch2m.com

-----Original Message-----
From: sclement [mailto:sclement@denver.iti.edu]
Sent: July 25, 2000 8:32 PM
To: Germany, Mary/COR; 'Jennifer Corby'; 'Barbara Ilyes (E-mail)';
'Brigid Madden (E-mail)'; 'Dan Parrish (E-mail)'; 'Gary Piserchio
(E-mail)'; 'Kari Hill (E-mail 2)'; 'Laura Morrison (E-mail)'; 'Stacy
Marr (E-mail)'; 'Steve Clement (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: rafting update

I'm in.

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Mary/COR [mailto:mgermany@CH2M.com]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 4:15 PM
To: 'Jennifer Corby'; Barbara Ilyes (E-mail); Brigid Madden (E-mail);
Dan Parrish (E-mail); Gary Piserchio (E-mail); Kari Hill (E-mail 2);
Laura Morrison (E-mail); Stacy Marr (E-mail); Steve Clement (E-mail)
Subject: RE: rafting update

Hey Gang,

Below is the information on the campground.  If we have 5 or more the cost
will be $5 per person per night (includes showers, thank God!).  Let me know
if you are going for sure and I will call back and reserve spots for us.

Fort Gorge RV Park
& Campground
45044 US Highway 50 West
719-275-5111
94 Sites, 54 Pull Thru, 40 Tent Sites, 3 Cabins, 50 Amp Service, Open
4/15-10/1

Mary Germany, Manager
Accounts Payable
Payroll
Accounting Support
(303) 713-2151
fax (303) 846-2151
email - mgermany@ch2m.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Corby [mailto:JenniferC@asttrust.com]
Sent: July 24, 2000 12:30 PM
To: Barbara Ilyes (E-mail); Brigid Madden (E-mail); Dan Parrish
(E-mail); Gary Piserchio (E-mail); Kari Hill (E-mail 2); Laura Morrison
(E-mail); Germany, Mary/COR; Stacy Marr (E-mail); Steve Clement (E-mail)
Subject: rafting update

August 12th is open for rafting.  The Royle Gorge section will be low,
so we do not have to rent wetsuits.  But, you can if you want to.  The
price is $86.89/person.  If we get 12 or more people it's $78.20/person.

I have not heard from all of you yet, so please let me know if you are
interested.  Mary is looking into the camp site.

I'll send another e-mail soon with updates.  :-)

Jen


Hi Folks, here we go for week 13.? This early  in the week, there are still
lots of questions of course. For players in doubt  with injuries, our
rankings reflect our best guess based on the info  available.
?
Good luck this week and I hope the bounces go your  way.
?
Joe
?
?
Quarterbacks:
?

1. Culpepper, Min

2. Green, StL

3. Frerotte, Den

4. Gannon, Oak

5. Favre, GB

6. Manning, Ind

7. Grbac, KC

8. McNair, Ten

9. George, Was

10. Dilfer, Bal

11. Testaverde, NYJ

12. Huard, Sea

13. Beuerlein, Car

14. Batch, Det

15. Brunell, Jac

16. McNabb, Phi

17. Collins, NYG

18. Johnson, Buf

19. Aikman, Dal

20. Fiedler, Mia

21. Brooks, NO

22. Stewart, Pit

23. Bledsoe, NE

24. King, TB

25. Chandler, Atl

Running Backs:?

1. Smith, Min

2. Lewis, Bal

3. Faulk, Stl

4. Bettis, Pit

5. James, Ind

6. George, Ten

7. Taylor, Jac

8. Smith, Dal

9. Davis, Was

10. Stewart, Det

11. Watters, Sea

12. Green, GB

13. Anderson, Den

14. Anderson, Atl

15. Martin, NYJ

16. Dillon, Cin

17. Smith, Mia

18. Dayne, NYG

19. Barber, NYG

20. Allen, Chi

21. Dunn, TB

22. Fazande, SD

23. Pittman, Ari

24. Redmond, NE

25. Autry, Phi

26. Crockett, Oak

27. Morton, NO

28. Kaufman, Oak

29. Biakabutuka, Car

30. Warren, Dal

31. Davis, Den

32. Parmalee, NYJ

33. Morris, Buf

34. Richardson, KC

35. Holmes, Bal

36. Anderson, NYJ

37. Prentice, Cle

38. Fletcher, SD

39. Huntley, Pit

40. Allen, NO

41. Hoover, Car

42. Pritchett, Phi

43. Jones, Ari

44. Watson, StL

45. Anders, KC

Wide Receivers:

1. Moss, Min

2. Bruce, StL

3. Harrison, Ind

4. Alexander, KC

5. Brown, Oak

6. Smith, Den

7. Smith, Jac

8. Robinson, Chi

9. Carter, Min

10. McCaffrey, Den

11. Freeman, GB

12. Muhammad, Car

13. Horn, NO

14. Moulds, Buf

15. Ismail, Bal

16. Johnson, TB

17. Chrebet, NYJ

18. Mason, Ten

19. Glenn, NE

20. Connell, Was

21. Holt, StL

22. Dawkins, Sea

23. Moore, Det

24. McKnight, Dal

25. Toomer, NYG

26. Schroeder, GB

27. Hayes, Car

28. Mathis, Atl

29. Green, TB

30. Graham, SD

31. Boston, Ari

32. McCardell, Jac

33. Morton, Det

34. Johnson, Phi

35. Thrash, Was

36. Morris, KC

37. Gadsden, Mia

38. Johnson, Cle

39. Ward, Pit

40. Conway, SD

41. Warrick, Cin

42. Rison, Oak

43. Brown, NE

44. Jackson, NO

45. Jurevicius, NYG

46. Sanders, Ari

47. Hakim, StL

48. Dwight, Atl

49. Pathon, Ind

50. Kennison, Chi

Tight Ends:

1. Sharpe, Bal

2. Gonzalez, KC

3. Jones, SD

4. Riemersma, Buf

5. Wycheck, Ten

6. Dudley, Oak

7. Carswell, Den

8. Lewis, Phi

9. Williams, StL

10. Brady, Jac

11. Franks, GB

12. Dilger, Ind

13. Harris, Dal

14. Pollard, Ind

15. Fauria, Sea

16. Alexander, Was

17. Sloan, Det

18. Becht, NYJ

19. Mitchell, NYG

20. Glover, NO

21. Moore, TB

22. Davis, Min

23. Rutledge, NE

24. McGee, Cin

25. Kelly, Atl

Kickers:

1. Stover, Bal

2. Elam, Den

3. Vanderjagt, Ind

4. Anderson, Min

5. Longwell, GB

6. Janikowski, Oak

7. Hanson, Det

8. Mare, Mia

9. Grammatica, TB

10. Nedney, Car

11. Del Greco, Ten

12. Murray, Was

13. Hollis, Jac

14. Brown, Pit

15. Hall, StL

16. Akers, Phi

17. Hall, NYJ

18. Christie, Buf

19. Lindell, Sea

20. Peterson, KC

21. Seder, Dal

22. Vinatieri, NE

23. Daluiso, NYG

24. Brien, NO

25. Andersen, Atl

Defenses:

1. Baltimore

2. Oakland

3. Pittsburgh

4. Tennessee

5. Kansas  City

6. Washington

7. Tampa Bay

8. Detroit

9. Miami

10.  Philadelphia

11. Minnesota

12. Buffalo

13. Denver

14. New York  Jets

15. Green Bay

16. New York  Giants

17. St. Louis

18.  Jacksonville

19. New  Orleans

20. New  England

21.  Indianapolis

22. Chicago

23. Seattle

24. Carolina

25. San  Diego

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


Take a look at the attached and let's discuss.  Maureen is in Vince
Kaminski's group and wants to leave.  How about reg risk?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 03:21 PM -----

	Maureen Raymond@ECT
	02/21/2001 07:36 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Resume and Website

As promised yesterday, attached is my resume and the link to the FX and
Sovereign Risk group's website.  I have also enclosed a list of the projects
that I have recently completed.  In addition the projects, I have attached an
inventory of the  curves that I have produced for corporate-wide deal
assessment.  I produced 483 curves last year for 58 countries, each curve
requires a full country risk analysis including a macro-economic policy
analysis, balance of payments analysis, and political risk analysis.  I look
forward to continuing to provide you with economic analysis in the future.

I hope to see you in two months.

http://ecthou-webcl1.corp.enron.com/research/ForeignExchange/FXMain.htm

Regards,

Maureen


I will get you all the information you need and try to fill that out the best I can.

-Joe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jonda Stowell <jls@fullenweider.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jonda+20Stowell+20+3Cjls+40fullenweider+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 1:11 PM
To:	Stepenovitch, Joe
Subject:	RE: Discovery Responses

Joe,

If you would be so kind as to bring your address book and/or a list of
family and friends, including addresses and phone numbers, of those who have
knowledge of this situation, especially your mom and sister and anyone who
had firsthand knowledge (not just things you've told them, but things they
knew or experienced) of the issues in this case.  For instance, a coworker
might know things you've told while all this has been going on, but a common
friend or neighbor would have more significant knowledge.

Also, if you would go through the Interrogatories and take a stab at
answering the questions that you have answers to, it will save you a lot of
attorney fee time.

Thanks!
Jonda

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com [mailto:Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:52 PM
To: jls@fullenweider.com
Subject: RE: Discovery Responses

Thank you,

cell phone# 713-899-0954 and home# 713-802-9262 (the cell phone is the best
way to get in touch with me)

I'll see you tomorrow have a nice day,

-Joe

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jonda Stowell <jls@fullenweider.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jonda+20Stowell+20+3Cjls+40fullenweider+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@
ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Monday, October 01, 2001 12:36 PM
   To:     Stepenovitch, Joe
   Subject:  RE: Discovery Responses

   Joe-

   I can't guarantee what time he will call today, but it will have to be
   between appointments.  As he will be at a seminar all next week, his
   appointments were scheduled VERY tight this week, along with three days
   of
   depositions which have been scheduled for over 2 months.  It may not be
   until this evening.  He has your work and cell phone numbers.

   Jonda

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com [mailto:Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com]
   Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:41 PM
   To: jls@fullenweider.com
   Subject: RE: Discovery Responses

   I will be there tomorrow at 3:45....  Do you know about what time Mr.
   Fullenweider will be calling so I can give you the phone number.  I
   leave
   work around 3:30.  Whatever time is best for him!

   Thanks again,

   -Joe

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Jonda Stowell <jls@fullenweider.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jonda+20Stowell+20+3Cjls+40fullenweider+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@
   ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Monday, October 01, 2001 12:28 PM
      To:     Stepenovitch, Joe
      Subject:  RE: Discovery Responses

      Joe,

      Can you come Tuesday at 3:45 to meet with me?

      I have given Mr. Fullenweider a message to call you in the interim.

      Jonda

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com [mailto:Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com]
      Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:32 AM
      To: jls@fullenweider.com
      Subject: RE: Discovery Responses

      Jonda,

      I understand Mr. Fullenweider has meeting but after what Tonya put me
      and
      my family through last week we would like some answers and action.  I
      have
      cut off all communication with her and now she is sending me emails
      (trying
      to act like nothing happened) I'm sure her lawyer is telling her to
   do
      that
      so she can say she has been keeping me informed of my son. (I will
      forward
      them to you)  I am very upset and I'm sure you can understand why, I
      really
      think there is something really wrong ( I just have that feeling or
   she
      is
      mentally unstable )  How can she be aloud to keep me from my son?

      Anyway,  If I can't meet with Mr. Fullenwerider can you and I meet to
   go
      over the discovery responses and does this mean were going to a jury
      trial?
      Why are they aloud to ask these questions and are we doing the
   something
      to
      Tonya?  I don't understand....

      I can't get out of leaving on Thursday, this is a business meeting
   for
      work
      (not pleasure)  I can come Today, Tuesday and Wednesday anytime after
      3:30.
      I hope that helps

      Thanks again,

      -Joe

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Jonda Stowell <jls@fullenweider.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jonda+20Stowell+20+3Cjls+40fullenweider+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@
      ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Monday, October 01, 2001 10:59 AM
         To:     Stepenovitch, Joe
         Subject:  RE: Discovery Responses

         Dear Joe,

         I'm sorry but I have Mr. Fullenweider scheduled in back-to-back
         meetings,
         hearings and depositions this week.  I might be able to arrange a
      short
         telephone conference today or tomorrow.  Otherwise, his deposition
         schedule
         may clear up on Wednesday and Thursday depending on how the Judge
      rules
         at a
         hearing tomorrow morning.  If the depositions get reset by the
   Court,
      I
         could fit you in on Wednesday or Thursday.

         I absolutely must visit with you this week about your discovery
         responses
         because I will be out of town next week and they are due next
   Friday.

         Jonda

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com
   [mailto:Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com]
         Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:45 AM
         To: jls@fullenweider.com
         Subject: RE: Discovery Responses

         Good Morning Jonda,

         I would like to met with Mr. Fullenweider today if that is
   possible?
         I'm
         going out of town Thursday thru Sunday of this week.  I think it
   is
      very
         important that I speak with him as soon as possible.  Please let
   me
      know
         if
         today is good for him.  Thanks again,

         -Joe

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Jonda Stowell <jls@fullenweider.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jonda+20Stowell+20+3Cjls+40fullenweider+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@
         ENRON.com]

            Sent:   Sunday, September 30, 2001 12:18 PM
            To:     Stepenovitch, Joe
            Subject:  Discovery Responses

            Dear Joe,

            Would it be possible for you to come in one  day next week at
      about
         3:00
            p.m. to go over your discovery responses?   Alternatively, you
      could
            come in two days at 4:00 p.m.  On Thursday, I  leave early for
   my
         son's
            soccer practice.  Perhaps Tuesday and Friday would  be good for
         you???
            Jonda L. Stowell
            Legal Assistant
            The Fullenweider Firm
            4265 San  Felipe, Suite 1400
            Houston, TX  77027
            (713) 624-4100  Telephone
            (713) 624-4141 Facsimile
             e-mail:  jls@fullenweider.com

   **********************************************************************
         This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
      affiliate
         and
         may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
   of
      the
         intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
   disclosure
      by
         others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
   recipient
      (or
         authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
   sender
      or
         reply
         to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
   delete
         all
         copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
   are
      not
         intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
      evidence
         a
         binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
   its
         affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
      not
         be
         relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
      otherwise.
         Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Good Afternoon,
Yesterday my inbox, all my personal e-mail folders, and any document
attached to an e-mail were lost.  Nothing happend specifically to cause
this.  We do not know where the data went and have been unable to retrieve
it.  Please, if you know anything about Outlook or data recover, I need your
help.  I rely on e-mail not only for communication but to transfer and
receive very important information - some of which will be lost permanently
unless I am able to restore the files.  I also use my e-mail as a form of
record keeping and information storage, which helps me to do my job.
Please, if you can help or know someone who may, get in touch with me.  My
direct line is 408-501-7870.  Thanks - recovering this information will make
me very happy!!!

Laura


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 08:16 AM
---------------------------

"Stinebaugh, John" <john.stinebaugh@csfb.com> on 05/26/2000 07:15:22 AM
To: "'don.miller@enron.com'" <don.miller@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Comps_DCF.xls

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Modi, Rishi
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 9:48 PM
> To: 'jeff.donahue@enron.com'
> Cc: Stinebaugh, John
> Subject: Comps_DCF.xls
>
> Jeff-
>
> Attached for your review is an Excel file which outlines the capital
> cost/kW of several comparable peaking power projects.  In addition, we
> have included a DCF analysis for each year in the contract period.  Thank
> you very much.
>
> Rishi N. Modi
> rishi.modi@csfb.com
> 212-325-9130 (phone)
> 212-325-8047 (fax)
>
> CREDIT | FIRST
> SUISSE | BOSTON
> Global Energy &
> Project Finance Group
>
>
>  <<Comps_DCF.xls>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.

 - Comps_DCF.xls


Hi there,

No news here for me, but I thought you might enjoy looking at the second
chart.  Hope you have PowerPoint so you can open this!

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000 10:56
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mark Frevert and Mark Haedicke                           12/04/2000
10:36 AM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Wholesale Services Employees
cc:

Subject: Enron Wholesale Services Legal Department

 As a follow-up to the recent Enron Corp. memorandum forming Enron Wholesale
Services (EWS), effective today, we have reorganized the Wholesale Services
Legal Department.

 The goals in reorganizing the department are as follows:  (i) align the
legal department as closely as possible with the business units, (ii) speed
the flow of legal technology across the business units, and (iii) achieve
greater efficiency and consistency across the organization.

 To this end, a legal policy group will be formed for EWS Legal, which will
include Lance Schuler, Enron Americas; Mark Evans, Enron Europe; Mark Taylor,
Enron Net Works; Alan Aronowitz, Enron Global Markets; Julia Murray, Enron
Industrial Markets; and Bruce Lundstrom, Enron Global Assets.

 The organization chart for the EWS Legal Department is attached.  More
comprehensive organization charts will follow for each group.

Mark Frevert and Mark Haedicke


As part of our continuing communication we would like to inform you that a
memorial scholarship fund has been established in memory of Chad Garren, who
died during Tropical Storm Allison Friday night. "The Chad Garren Memorial
Scholarship Fund" will benefit a student at Weatherford High School,
Weatherford, Texas attending Texas A & M University. Chad was a Global
Technology intern, working in ETS.  If you are interested in contributing to
this fund, please send your donations to Community Relations EB1635a. Checks
can be made payable to "The Chad Garren Memorial Scholarship Fund".  All
donations will be matched by Enron, and it is not necessary to fill out a
matching gift form.

Funeral services for Chad have been set for 10:00 am on Wednesday June 13 at
the First United Methodist Church (301 South Main St.) in Weatherford,
Texas.


Here are the directions:

Bank of America 1.800.299.2265

 1) press 0# twice in order to bypass the voice menu and connect to an
operator.
 2) tell them you need to wire funds.

Datek
http://www.datek.com/popinframe.html?ref=/helpdesk/index.html&navNumber=3

 This link has all the info you need.
 On the left side of the page, click "Helpdesk" then "Managing funds".
 Scroll down to the heading, "Wire Instructions for Transfer of Funds to
Datek Online".
 Have this page up while you talk with the bank operator because she will
need the info off this page.


Start Date: 1/4/02; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010417.txt


OUTLOOK Enron Q3 EPS 43 cents vs 34
AFX News, 10/11/01
UK: UPDATE 1-Rothschild exits base metals, precious unaffected.
Reuters English News Service, 10/11/01
INDIA: London court gives Enron India unit respite in row.
Reuters English News Service, 10/11/01
ECUADOR: Three firms accept Ecuador oil contracts at WTI-$6.97.
Reuters English News Service, 10/11/01
UK: Asian clean tanker freight seen falling - brokers.
Reuters English News Service, 10/11/01
JOBS
South Florida Sun-Sentinel, 10/11/01

OUTLOOK Enron Q3 EPS 43 cents vs 34

10/11/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd

NEW YORK (AFX) - Enron Corp is expected to report next Tuesday third-quarter earnings per share of 43 cents, compared with 34 cents a year earlier, according to the First Call/Thomson Financial consensus of 17 brokers.
The integrated energy company is expected to meet near-consensus results driven by its wholesale services division, analysts said.
Montgomery Securities analyst Daniel Tulis is calculating third-quarter EPS of 42 cents, 1 cent below consensus.
Full-year EPS stands at 1.85.
Enron's third quarter was marked by the unexpected departure of chief executive Jeff Skilling, for personal reasons, with Chairman Ken Lay reassuming the key position.
Lay is likely to remain in the position until it is filled within 12-18 months, Tulis said.
The company remains embroiled in arbitration proceedings in India after its 2.9 bln usd Dabhol power plant in India was closed. The plant's sole client, the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), failed - and later refused - to pay bills that now total about 45 mln usd.
blms/gc For more information and to contact AFX: www.afxnews.com and www.afxpress.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UK: UPDATE 1-Rothschild exits base metals, precious unaffected.
By Andy Blamey

10/11/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

LONDON, Oct 11 (Reuters) - Blue-blooded banker N M Rothschild & Sons Ltd said on Thursday it would shut down its base metals trading operations except in Australia - the third base metals trader this week to announce cutbacks.
Rothschild remains firmly committed to its precious metals activity, however, company managing director and group treasurer Geoffrey Spice told Reuters.
The company, the merchant banking arm and UK branch of the Rothschild family's financial empire, chairs the twice-daily benchmark price-setting London gold fix.
"In light of difficult trading conditions in the base metals markets, we have concluded that our limited base metals operation is no longer viable," company Chairman Sir Evelyn de Rothschild said in a statement.
"We've been reviewing the situation for quite some time. We've found that trading conditions (in base metals) have been difficult and opportunities have been limited," Spice said.
Rothschild would not be taking on any new positions in base metals but would see existing positions on its books through to fruition, according to clients' wishes, he said.
Rothschild is a category 2 (associate broker clearing) member of the London Metal Exchange (LME); the company would maintain its LME membership while existing positions run their course and would review it in due course, Spice said.
The move to exit base metals will involve the closure of Rothschild's metals sales desk in New York and a number of redundancies in the London and New York trading, sales and support areas, the company said.
Employees were informed of the decision on Thursday afternoon; around 20 Rothschild staff in total would be affected by the move, Spice said.
The company's Australian base metals activities would continue as normal, however, he added.
"Australia has a very strong franchise and will continue to operate in the base metals market," he said.
The Rothschild move follows news this week that the Bank of Nova Scotia will scale back its base metals trading desk and that Enron Metals plans to cut around 10 percent of staff as a part of a Europe-wide job cut programme.
Base metals traders have been struggling in recent months in the face of falling business volumes and sagging metals prices as continuing economic gloom and uncertainty after the September 11 attacks on the United States leave buyers sidelined.
PRECIOUS METALS STRONG
Spice stressed, however, that the company's precious metals operations would continue as normal.
"We have a very strong position in precious metals which will not be affected in any way," he said.
"N M Rothschild remains strongly committed to our core business in precious metals and continues to be at the forefront of spot, forward and option bullion markets and a leading member of the London Bullion Market Association," the company statement said.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

INDIA: London court gives Enron India unit respite in row.

10/11/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

BOMBAY, Oct 11 (Reuters) - The Indian unit of U.S. energy major Enron Corp . said on Thursday it had obtained a ruling from a London court preventing a provincial government from legally challenging international arbitration proceedings.
Enron's Indian unit, Dabhol Power Company, has taken a local Indian utility to the International Court of Arbitration in London for a breach of contract.
The utility, the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, had signed a contract to buy the output from Dabhol's $2.9 billion power plant on the western coast of India. It later said it did not need all the power from the 2,184 MW plant, and that it was too expensive.
But a local regulatory authority, the Maharashtra State Electricity Commission, said the power company's dispute with the utility fell within its ambit, and that Dabhol could not proceed with the arbitration. This sparked a round of litigation, which is now at a stage where the Bombay High Court must decide whether Dabhol can take the dispute to London.
In order to prevent more litigation, Enron obtained an injunction from the Commercial Court in London which restrains the government of Maharashtra, which owns the utility, from also filing a suit in India challenging the international arbitration proceedings.
"Over the past few months, the government of Maharashtra and other government entities have taken actions to avoid complying with their contractual obligations," Dabhol said in a statement received late on Thursday. "This has frustrated the rights of international investors that were legally agreed to by the relevant parties several years ago."
Government officials were not be reached for comment.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

ECUADOR: Three firms accept Ecuador oil contracts at WTI-$6.97.

10/11/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

QUITO, Ecuador, Oct 11 (Reuters) - Anglo Energy, Enron and Rio Energy agreed to match the price of $6.97 below West Texas Intermediate (WTI) for Ecuador crude contracts for November, a Petroecuador official said Thursday.
Petroecuador last week retendered eight three-month crude contracts, each for 12,000 barrels per day (bpd), following a price dispute with former contract holders that led Ecuador's state oil company to break the contracts.
The company awarded Coastal Petroleum two contracts on Friday at WTI minus $6.97, with a floor price for WTI at $20 per barrel, and offered other interested companies the chance to match this price for November.
Petroecuador will set the price of Ecuador's crude for December and January.
Anglo Energy will take two contracts while Enron and Rio Energy will take one contract each, the official said on the condition of anonymity.
It was not immediately clear what would happen to two crude contracts sought by Glencore. Glencore had yet to respond to the offer on Thursday, the source said.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UK: Asian clean tanker freight seen falling - brokers.

10/11/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

LONDON, Oct 11 (Reuters) - Asian petroleum product trades are likely to benefit from falling freight costs next week, as a raft of surplus tankers makes its way towards Singapore, tanker brokers said on Thursday.
"There's a lot of ships ballasting down from Japan, arriving from the middle of next week onwards," said a Singapore broker. "From October 15 to 20 there will be eight to 10 ships in the area. Rates will fall further."
He said that intra-Asian freight rates had already started to slide from a spike that topped W280 at the start of the week to W260 on Thursday ($17.52 per tonne).
He said that transpacific trade, which often serves to tighten up the intra-Asian market, was dead.
"The only arbs that are open are gasoline to Singapore from Europe and jet going the other way," he said. "Cargill did 35,000 tonnes from Malacca to UK-Cont on the High Challenge: we're guessing jet."
London brokers said Enron had also booked a ship, the Teekay Freighter, to shift 70,000 tonnes of gasoil from Jamnagar, India to Europe.
Brokers said that the Mideast Gulf trade, which occasionally sucks surplus ships out of Asia, was also quiet. Glencore booked two tankers for 40,000 tonne clean cargoes from Yanbu to East Coast India at W235, down 15 points on week-ago levels.
"Long Range trades from the Gulf are quiet," said a London broker. "Nothing's happening so it's difficult to know where rates stand, but basically it's going down."
A panel of brokers from London's Baltic Exchange pegged the naphtha trade on 75,000 tonners from the Gulf to Japan at W189 late on Wednesday, following a fall of eight points from week-ago levels.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

LOCAL
DANIA RESIDENTS POKE HOLES IN PIPELINE PLAN
David Fleshler Staff Writer

10/11/2001
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Broward Metro
3B
(Copyright 2001 by the Sun-Sentinel)

A proposal to build a natural gas pipeline from the Bahamas to Broward County drew harsh reviews Wednesday from an audience in Dania Beach.
Not a single speaker spoke in favor of the project, although one or two were neutral, during a public workshop held by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at the I.T. Parker Community Center.
"It is totally insane to put a high-pressure natural gas pipeline through such a densely populated area," said Susan Epps, of Oakland Park. "The loss of life and property if there would be an accident would be catastrophic."
The commission is preparing an environmental impact statement for the project. More workshops will be held once a draft is ready. The process is expected to take several months.
Enron Corp. of Houston proposed the pipeline as a way to meet the state's growing demand for natural gas, a relatively clean and increasingly popular fuel for power plants. Two other companies have made similar proposals.
Enron's representatives say construction of the pipeline would do minimal damage to the coral reefs in its path. And it is an extremely safe way to transport natural gas.
But few people in the audience saw it that way.
Dan Clark, a member of a Broward County group that monitors the health of coral reefs, said that the company's representatives painted too rosy a picture of the project's impact on coral reefs by claiming that drilling a path under the reefs would leave them unharmed.
"What they failed to tell you is that they're going to have to assemble the pipe across the second reef and drag it across the second reef," he said. "At a time when we're losing these habitats, we don't want to lose any more, willingly."
Some speakers questioned the wisdom of bringing in another source of fossil fuels, however clean it may be, rather than putting more effort in conservation and renewable energy.
"Why don't we regulate people's use of energy?" asked Judy Kuchta, of North Beach in Hollywood. "Why do people have to waste energy playing stupid video games and watching mindless TV?"
Several speakers worried about the project's effects on John U. Lloyd State Park, a popular beachfront park under which the pipeline would run.
"The park simply can't sustain the additional degradation of pipeline construction and operation," said Sara Case, speaking for Save Our Shoreline, a Hollywood conservation group. "The beach is one of Broward County's most important sea turtle nesting areas. Shore birds are attracted to the park. We simply find it difficult to believe that significant environmental damage is not inevitable from this monumental project."
David Fleshler can be reached at dfleshler@sun-sentinel.com or 954- 356-4535.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

BUSINESS
JOBS
Bloomberg News

10/11/2001
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Broward Metro
3D
(Copyright 2001 by the Sun-Sentinel)

Enron Corp., the largest energy trader, plans to cut as many as 500 jobs in Europe, or as much as 10 percent of its work force there, to reduce costs and boost profit.
The company has 5,000 workers in Europe and plans to trim jobs by 5 percent to 10 percent. "Business continues to grow in terms of traded volumes and numbers of transactions, but like any company, we are constantly seeking ways to do more with less," John Sherriff, chief executive of Enron Europe, said.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


<<ltr to mann re strategy & legal fees_v2.DOC>>
Kerri asked that I send this letter to you by email.  I originally sent it
to you by facsimile on August 14, 2001.

Stephanie Shine
Assistant to Kerri Barsh
Greenberg Traurig
(305) 579-0500 x2561

_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.


This request has been pending your approval for  25 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000076886&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000076886
Request Create Date : 11/20/01 12:47:06 PM
Requested For       : hai.chen@enron.com
Resource Name       : Reuters Kobra 3.5.1
Resource Type       : Applications


i know.  i love working here.  i wish it would just get fixed.  i don't think mgmt has informed us of what is going on completely.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hal Lenhart <Hal.Lenhart@apollogrp.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

Hang in there, later down the road you will find this a valuable learning
experience. At your age, you will bounce back from anything.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:53 AM
To: Hal.Lenhart@apollogrp.edu
Subject: RE:

the assets are marked up and we cant sell them.  the problem is that we
have tapped out our credit lines and we need another $2 billion.  seems
like we are racing against the clock.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Hal Lenhart <Hal.Lenhart@apollogrp.edu>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:51 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   I would think someone will step up, if nothing else for the trading
   business
   and physical assets.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:47 AM
   To: hfl@fp.edu
   Subject:

   what are the odds of enron making it.  seems that we are in a cash
   crunch.

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


fyi

-----Original Message-----
From: jdietert@simmonsco-intl.com [mailto:jdietert@simmonsco-intl.com]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 7:40 AM
To: jdietert@simmonsco-intl.com
Subject: CFTC

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dietert/SCI on 06/17/02 07:39 AM -----

                    Daniel
                    Jenkins              To:     Sales Trading
                                         cc:
                    06/17/02             Subject:     CFTC
                    07:37 AM

   The natural gas non-commercial net SHORT position increased
   significantly to 6,151 from 1,056 contracts.  This large increase in the
   net short position was primarily due to the 20% increase in the
   non-commercial short position to 27,103 from 22,655 contracts the
   previous week.
   The natural gas commercial net short position decreased to 8,434 from
   14,947 contracts.  The cumulative natural gas net short position
   decreased to 14,585 from 16,003 contracts.
   The non-commercial crude net short position decreased significantly to
   214 from 12,742 contracts the previous week.  The large change in the
   non-commercial crude net long position was due to the 16% decrease in
   the non-commercial long and the 25% increase in the non-commercial short
   position.
   The commercial crude net position became net long for the first time
   since the week of 2/26/2002.  The cumulative crude oil net position also
   became net long.  The cumulative crude net position has not been net
   long since the week of 2/26/2002 as well.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic09894.pcx)

(See attached file: CFTC Report (1996-Present).xls)


Jason,

You should know what these terms mean.

Let's get both.

Vince

	From:  Jason Sokolov                           01/29/2001 03:52 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CalPX power prices

???
---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 03:52
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Van Houten                           01/29/2001 11:35 AM

To: Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CalPX power prices

Jason,

Are you looking for CalPX hour ahead UMCP or CalPX hour ahead zone prices?
We have hour ahead zone price data from 10/1/98 - current and hour ahead UMCP
from 11/6/2000 onward.
Maria V.H.

	From:  Jason Sokolov                           01/26/2001 09:17 AM

To: Maria Van Houten/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CalPX power prices

Maria,

I am looking for historical hourly real-time (spot) power prices for CalPX.
Can you help me to locate them?

Jason Sokolov


You rock, Angela! Don't worry, I'll be my usual quiet and unassuming self
when I come by for lunch. Although, if you guys are having hotdogs, doesn't
that mean that everyone pre-ordered? That would leave me "sans hotdog," which
would be tragic. Let me know.

Kate


Stinson:
Can we do the meeting today at 4:00?


Start Date: 3/12/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031212.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:  50.82 / Final:  50.79)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/12/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Patti will be distributing Astros tickets to you for the 2001 season.  We
used a process that gives you tickets for games in proportion to the number
of employees on your team.  I hope that you will enjoy the games and that you
will also be able to use some of the tickets to reward employees for a job
well done.

We have improved our tickets this year.  Thanks to Patti, who scoped out
options for new tickets, and to my husband, who studied advantages and
disadvantages of each option, we  have some good seats for the year.  The new
tickets (4 together) are Dugout tickets, located between home and third base,
about 28 rows up from the field.  Not aisle tickets this year, but I sat in
the seats for the pre-season opener, and they are a big improvement over last
year!  We will work on the aisle for next  year.  We also still have the two
Terrace level tickets as we did last year.  For some games you will get all 6
tickets, and for others you may get either the Dugout Tickets or the Terrace
tickets.

Not a bad start to the season so far, so hopefully the new ballpark jinx is
history!  --Sally


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Email Alert

Midday Market View(TM)
for Monday, November 26, 2001
as of 12:30PM EST
Information provided by Schwab Center for Investment Research
and Bridge

U.S. INDICES
(12:30 p.m. EST)

----------------------------------
Market            Value     Change

DJIA           9,932.10    - 27.61
Nasdaq Comp.   1,918.53    + 15.33
S&P 500        1,150.86     + 0.52
----------------------------------
NYSE Advancing Issues        1,382
NYSE Declining Issues        1,607
NYSE Trading Volume        511 mln
NASDAQ Advancing Issues      1,671
NASDAQ Declining Issues      1,741
NASDAQ Trading Volume      837 mln

==================================

U.S. TREASURIES
----------------------------------
Value            Yield      Change

6-month bill      2.03%        n/a
5-year note       4.30%     + 7/32
10-year note      4.92%    + 15/32
30-year bond      5.31%    + 21/32

The tables above look best when viewed in a fixed-width font,
such as "Courier."

================================================================

STOCKS SHED EARLIER GAINS

U.S. stocks are mixed but generally lower following a report by
the National Bureau of Economic Research indicating that the
U.S. officially fell into a recession in March of this year,
citing a plethora of economic indicators.  Although economic and
corporate news was sparse following the holiday weekend, early
post-Thanksgiving results in the retailing sector, including
record sales at Wal-Mart Stores (WMT,55,f2&f4), hinted that
consumer spending may be more resilient than previously
expected. Lucent Technologies (LU,7.93,f2) is suffering from
analyst downgrades. Treasuries were higher as bottom-fishers
stepped up in the absence of any salient economic data and
European markets are mixed late in the day.

As of 11:55 a.m. EST, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down
0.4%, while the Nasdaq is up 0.7%. The S&P 500 index is down
0.1%. Energy-related and communication equipment stocks are
leading the decliners, while semiconductor, wireless and auto
issues are among the best performers.

Shares of Wal-Mart were lower even as the discount retailing
giant reported a single-day record for sales of $1.25 billion on
Friday after its Holiday Blitz promotion attracted
bargain-hunters to its stores. Most of the holiday buying
appeared to be narrow in scope, with shoppers favoring the
deep-discount retailers over department stores. According to
TeleCheck Services Inc., same store sales in the U.S. rose 2.4%
on Friday.  In related news, Pier One Imports (PIR,14.41) got a
boost after it raised its same-store sales forecast for November
to an increase of 6%-8% and increased its 3Q earnings forecast
to $0.21-$0.23 per share from the previous $0.19-$0.21 per share
guidance.

Shares of Lucent Technologies were under pressure after the
communication networking company was downgraded by analysts at
two major brokerage houses. An ABN AMRO analyst lowered his 2002
earnings forecast to a loss of $0.53 per share from the previous
$0.39 per share loss estimate, while an analyst at Morgan
Stanley cited capital spending cuts and regulatory issues as
concerns.

----------------------------------------------------------------

TREASURY AND ECONOMIC SUMMARY

Bonds are higher across the curve as bargain-hunters stepped in
following the recent declines in Treasuries. Earlier, NBER said
that the 10-year U.S. economic expansion officially ended in
March of this year and a recession has officially ensued.
Uplifting comments from St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President
William Poole that the U.S. is starting to display signs of a
recovery did little to stem the upward momentum in Treasuries,
despite Poole's reference to rising equity prices, a firming
housing market, and stronger retail sales.

----------------------------------------------------------------

WORLD MARKETS

European markets are mixed late in the session, shedding earlier
gains as U.S. markets meandered in and out of positive
territory. The Bloomberg European 500 index is down 0.07% as of
11:55 a.m. EST. Telecom equipment and mining stocks are the
best-performing issues, while energy stocks are pacing the
decliners. Nokia (NOK,25,f2) and Ericsson (ERICY,5.74,f1) shares
were higher after Morgan Stanley increased its forecast for
worldwide wireless phone unit sales by 5.4% to 390 million
phones in 2001 and by 3.6% to 435 million phones in 2002. In
other equity news, Deutsche Lufthansa AG's (DLAKY,14.00) CEO
said that he sees "no signs of recovery" in passenger traffic,
though he does anticipate an eventual pick up in demand. The
euro remained in positive territory against the dollar but
retreated from earlier highs. Crude oil is trading lower as
Russia continues to act defiant toward any meaningful production
cut, choosing to wait until Dec. 10 instead to plan production
for 2002.

William Johnson, Market Analyst

================================================================

LOGIN to access your account:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start

----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel. (0801-11478)

Information provided by Bridge Information Systems.
Copyright 2001 Bridge Information Systems.

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. ("Schwab") is a member of the NYSE.

Schwab Capital Markets L.P. is a member of the NASD and SIPC.
Schwab Capital Markets L.P. is also a subsidiary of The Charles
Schwab Corporation and is a market maker in approximately 5000
securities.

Schwab Center for Investment Research ("SCIR") is part of
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. The information contained herein
is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its
accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. This report is for
informational purposes only and is not a solicitation, or a
recommendation that any particular investor should purchase or
sell any particular security. Schwab does not assess the
suitability or the potential value of any particular investment.
All expressions of opinions are subject to change without
notice. The Charles Schwab Corporation, Schwab, Schwab Capital
Markets L.P. and its officers, directors, employees, consultants
and/or members of their families may have a position in, and may
from time to time, purchase or sell any of the mentioned or
related securities including derivatives in such securities. At
any given time, Schwab specialists, or Schwab Capital Markets
L.P. market makers, may have an inventory position, either
"long" or "short" in any security mentioned in this report as a
result of their specialist/market making functions,
respectively.
(C)2001 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

  F1 Schwab Capital Markets L.P. makes a market in this
     security.
  F2 Schwab is a specialist in this security.
  F3 Schwab has managed or co-managed a public offering
     in this security within the last three years.
  F4 An employee of Schwab is a Director of this company.
  F5 An analyst covering this stock has an investment position.

This service is for personal use only. Commercial use or
redistribution in any form, print or electronic, is prohibited.

Distribution by Quris, Inc.


Mark -

thanks for the response.

I agree with you that identifying all of the Regulatory Risks associated with
either a specific asset (e.g., Sutton Bridge) or a trading book (e.g., UK
gas) is impossible.  We could have 50 people spending 100% of their time
sitting around dreaming up 'what-ifs' and still not see everything.  On the
other hand, as your team does now, once we have been able to identify
reasonable risks, it is more than appropriate to attempt to impute /
calculate the potential loss and assign people to mitigate these risks.

On the flip side of the risk coin, the process of identifying Regulatory Risk
should also allow Govt Affairs, working with our business colleagues,  to
identify rule changes / policy changes that could positively impact our
bottom line.  For instance, we could push through regulatory action for a
retail rate decrease providing EES with more commodity margin.

I don't disagree that these risks which I am trying to track are business
risks.  But they are fundamentally the result of changes in regulatory policy
(taxes, export/import, rates, etc.).  Because Enron is actively participating
in many regulated or semi-regulated environments, regulatory risks are
business risks.

Finally, it is my understanding that Govt Affairs needs to be involved in
assisting our business people in managing these risks.  To this end, the
Regulatory Risk Working Group has identified the following set of
responsibilities for Govt Affairs:

_ To identify Regulatory Risks within current assets.
_ To analyze pending transactions for Regulatory Risks.
_ To recommend alternative commercial arrangements to reduce Regulatory Risk.
_ To assess and compute &value at risk8 for each Regulatory Risk.
_ To develop transfer mechanisms for Regulatory Risk (e.g., insurance).
_ To propose and/or plan mitigation devices for Regulatory Risks.
_ To assign EGA and/or commercial responsibility and resources for mitigation
efforts.
_ To review mitigation efforts against existing plans.
_ To advocate regulatory frameworks which reduce Regulatory Risk (e.g., BIT).
_ To prevent catastrophic Regulatory Risk events (> $25 MM).
_ To report to Enron management global Regulatory Risk position.
_ To coordinate knowledge with other risk groups within Enron.

I look forward to seeing you when you are in Houston and discussing this
further.  Like you, I don't want to create some process that provides little
to no value.

JDS

Mark Schroeder@ECT
02/10/2000 03:17 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon
Killey/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets

yes, let's meet.  I will have Sharon try to put something in the diary.

I would suggest the hardest part is "anticipating" these changes.  here are
some examples:  UK Climate Change Levy, even other Government Departments in
the UK are not allowed to kow what is in the Budget until the Chancellor
delivers it to Parliament.  Turkish fuel consumption tax, I believe, was
modified without prior notice.  In Romania, Doug Wood met with the Energy
Minister on the proposed Gas Decree, and 2 days later they passed another
draft of the decree, which had been rejected before Christmas, verbatim.  Tom
Briggs can tell you that the annual revenue formula for BG TransCo, which
affects all of our UK assets, can swing up or down by 10% per annum, and
cannot be predicted/modelled (we and our consultants have tried).  Decisions
by Polish regulator to price regulate generation in Poland, notwithstanding
our PPA, was another example.  The list goes on.  I remain a sceptic that all
of these risks, or even many of them, can be "identified" a priori.  Once we
fact them, we do assess/mitigate.  In Europe, I think we accept these as
"business" risks, that the regulatory team responds to.   mcs

James D Steffes@EES
09/02/2000 21:02
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets

Mark --

Thanks for the additions.  I will add to the Asset / Responsibility Matrix.

The definition I have been using is that Regulatory Risk is a subset of
Sovereign Risk (with the other element being Political Risk).  Regulatory
Risk is a "legal" action taken by a government or its agent which modifies
Enron's business environment, most often directly through modifications in
the energy and communications markets, but also in broad areas such as taxes
and export - import policies.  Political Risk is a "supra-legal" action that
has the same impact (e.g., expropriation).

Currently the Regulatory Risk Working Group (Fiona Grant is member) is trying
to put in place a "standard" process to review and analyze regualtory risk
around the globe - quite an undertaking.  When I use the term Regulatory Risk
Management, I am primarily talking about such a process.  The key elements of
any risk management function are (1) identification, (2) assessment, (3)
mitigation / transference, and (4) audit.  You would probably agree that the
most difficult problem is to try and assess the impact of any Regulatory Risk
event.  The other key goal is to have a Mitigation Plan in place with an
assigned person to "manage" our activities so that Enron does not face an
associated loss.

My goal is to try an have this process in place by mid-year.  That would
include having undertaken a structured review of our current Assets (the
reason for the original questions) and the ability to review pending deals.

When you come over to Houston next week I would really like to sit down and
go through my thoughts with you.

Thanks.

JDS

Mark Schroeder@ECT
02/09/2000 05:48 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Fiona
Grant/LON/ECT@ECT, Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets

Jim - overnight I realised you need to add our project in Turkey (Fiona
Grant) and Poland (Philip Davies).  I have not given you any one person, as
the regulatory issues seem to be country/environment specific, and instead I
have given you the names of each person with country responsibility.  Indeed,
at year-end we completed a financial transaction (Project Margaux), in which
regulatory risk was reviewed.  A definition of Rugulatory Risk would be
helpful, e.g., in most of these markets, trading arrangements are being
re-written, or developed for the first time, this put existing PPAs under
pressure.  Would energy taxes, carbon taxes/trading, transmission pricing
(both for evacuation of power, and delivery of gas), changes in property
tax/fuel tax regimes, risk of price regulation, all be included?  Do you have
checklist?  We can identify these risks, what is meant by "manage"?  We work
on these types of issues on a daily basis, so I am unclear as to what else is
intended or implied.  thanks  mcs

James D Steffes@EES
08/02/2000 17:24
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets

Rick & Mark --

One of the first steps in building our Regulatory Risk process is to
establish responsibility for the current assets owned/managed by Enron.
Having a point person that I can contact will help me immensely.

Attached is a listing of the assets that I have been able to pull together --
there may be more that you know about.

Is it possible for us to agree upon the person(s) who will manage the
Regulatory Risk with each of these assets?  Please feel free to call me to
discuss.

I would like to have this assignment process complete within the month.

The same type of effort will be necessary as we review pending transactions.

Thanks.


Effective 04/1/2000, Columbia Gas Transmission will be transferring certain
facilities to Gatherco, Inc.  There should have been a message in Columbia
Navigator stating that there were certain meters that were going out of your
IPP pool 37147 effective 4/2000.  The subject for this e-mail message was
"Appalachian Meter Allocation".  The meters listed in this e-mail will now be
on Gatherco's gathering lines and are going to be subject to the $.25
gathering rate.  Per Dave Fusek at Gatherco, our final estimates for 04/2000
SHOULD reflect these meters that were changed from Columbia Gas Transmission
to Gatherco.  He said he is not 100% positive that they will get this
finished in time, but they are hoping to have everything complete by the time
they release our nominations.

Gloria and Wade,

You will need to make sure you have the correct charges associated with these
meters.  Some of these meters were previously subject to Columbia's $.27
gathering and some were straight transmission, which did not have any
gathering.  Again, these meters will now have a $.25 gathering charge.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Heidi Griffith


Folks...
We are also out in position manager for Saturday at Mead 230 because of the
LV Cogen sale going RT.

---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 03/16/2001
01:05 PM ---------------------------

Stanley Cocke
03/16/2001 01:00 PM
To: Portland Shift
cc: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stacy Runswick/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark
Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Morris/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Position Manager at Mead230

Just wanted to let everyone know that we will be out in position manager for
Sunday, 3/18.  We're out a total of 102MW, 17MW for HE11-16.  This is an LV
Cogen schedule that is going real-time.

Thanks,
Stan


- Governor's cost-benefit for MOU.pdf


Lynn, should I cancel Tuesday's team leader mtg. or would you like for me to reschedule for later that day?  Also I have marked the week of the 26th for a staff mtg. would you like for me to schedule such a meeting?

Thanks,
Ava
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winters, Ricki
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:44 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Bryant, Mike; Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Holmes, Bradley; January, Steve; Nacey, Sheila; Scott, Donna; Winters, Ricki
Cc:	Salinas, Marian; Carrillo, Alma; Brown, Sharon; Garcia, Ava
Subject:	ETS Staff Meeting
Importance:	High

Please block your calendar on Tuesday November 27th at 2:00 for an ETS Staff meeting.  I have tentatively blocked ECN39C1 for this meeting and Shelley will send a message to the group on Monday November 26.

Thank you, Ricki

Ricki Winters
Assistant to Shelley Corman
ETS Gas Logistics
(713) 853-5754
ECN4268A


Dolores,

I have signed up for the CFA exam in June.  Who do I need to talk to to get a
reimbursement?

Thanks,

Eric


Mike and Frank,

Attached is a revised quote for options relating to the ACE deal.  The
changes include actual Daily MW Production from Gray and also a hedge ratio
of 10.522 mmbtu's/MW.  I calculated the hedge ratio 2 ways.  First I put the
SRAC formula in excel (tying to the Aug'00 SRAC calculation from SoCal
Edison) and I increased the price of natural gas by $1 and noted the
difference in the SRAC power price.  That resulted in an increase in the SRAC
of $1.0522 cents/kwh or converted to $10.522/mwh.  I also looked at a change
in mark-to-market profit based on a hedge of 10.522 mmbtu's for every 1 MW.
So for every 1 mwh you need to hedge 10.522 mmbtu's.  Next I took the SRAC
formula below:

     Pn = {PBase + (PBase * (GPn - GPBase)/GPBase * Factor)} * TOU

    Where   Pn = SRAC price
     PBase = Base Enery Price $2.0808 cents/kwh (constant)
     GPn = current Socal index
     GPBase = Base Gas Price $1.3975/mmbtu (constant)
     Factor = % change in enery price affected by gas price .7067 (constant)
     TOU = time of use (i.e. Summer on peak = 1.4251)

If you look at just the piece that moves (GPn) and calculate a $1
increase:    ($2.0808 * ($1 - $1.375)/$1.375 * .7067) = 1.0522.

Gray had calculated the heat rate by taking the SRAC price divided by the gas
price.  This heat rate moves depending on the level of gas (decreases with an
increase in gas price).  This is a correct  calculation for the heat rate,
however, to calculate the hedge delta, the above calculation should be used
and this hedge delta stays constant no matter the level of gas price.

Please call with any questions or concerns.  My number is (713) 853-6247.
Thanks.

John


hi tana

they're fine for non US & Canadian based products (including physical power)
- the standard exceptions would be US power, weather and credit derivatives

j

From: Tana Jones on 22/03/2001 16:48 CST
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Amerada-Hess Corporation

As an introduction:  The referenced counterparty is trying to straighten out
the online products it wants to trade with us (it's open for some, but not
all of the products it wants to trade).

When I looked at Profile Manager to see what they had already been approved
to trade, I noticed that this counterparty was opened to trade many of the
European products, including specifically European physical power products
(which is unusual for a US based counterparty to trade).

Before I go in and change the profile for this counterparty, I wanted to
check with you and see if London had specifically opened them to trade the
products they were opened to trade (especially physical power).

What I usually do when I am approving US based counterparties, is that with
respect to Non Us & Canadian products, as long as they are an Eligible Swap
Participant I open them up for all products except European physical power,
which I never open them for.  Also, Credit Derivatives, I never open anyone
up for unless we really mean it.

So, my question to you is did London actively approve the non US & Canadian
based products (especially physical power).  If you didn't, then I am going
to take this as an oversight of the pre-approval process and shut them down
for European physical power.


Good morning.  One of my contacts at RGA sent me a copy of a letter that went
to DOE Secretary Abraham this week, thanking him for his participation in the
WGA conference in Portland.  It stated, in part :

 "We now believe it is imperative, given the importance of encouraging the
development of and investment in new plant construction, that you NOTextend
the Department of Energy orders requiring the sale of electricity and natural
gas, and a cap on those prices."

The general tone of the overall letter was that they want Davis to continue
fixing his own problem.   The letter was copied to Dick Cheney and Chairman
Hebert.  I'll send a copy along via fax later today.  The signing Governors
were:  Hull, Owens, Kempthorne, Martz, Guinn, Gary Johnson, Leavitt,
Geringer--all republicans.


I would love to but i can't this week.  Maybe next week.  But you guys please
go on without me.


Please see the attached draft.


Cindy,

October 11 would work for me. This is the date of my visit to Austin  to make
a presentation Ehud's MBA class.
If you need me to go to Austin an a different day, please, let me know. I
shall be glad to help you, my schedule
permitting.

Vince

Cindy Justice
07/05/2000 03:51 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vince Kaminski's Oct. 11 Presentation -- "Enron Day at the Energy
Finance Program"

Vince -

Christy Young is the UT MBA recruiter. She is taking a couple of weeks off to
get married and will return on July 19th as Christy Meador.  In her absence,
I wanted to make sure we coordianted our efforts with you.

Below are a few key UT recruiting dates. Ideally, we would like for your
presentation to occur a week or so before our interview list is due to the
Career Services Office. This will allow for additional candidates to submit
their resumes for our review before we turn in the interview list.

Wed., Sept. 13 - Corporate Presentation & Reception - Alumni Center
Fri., Sept. 22 - Eye's of Texas Career Fair - Campus
Thurs., Sept. 28 - Enron Interview List due to Career Services Office
Wed., Oct. 11 - Pre-interview Reception - selected candidates only
Thurs., Oct. 12 - First Round Interviews
Fri., Oct. 13 - Second Round Interviews
Sat., Oct. 28 - Super Saturday for UT Candidates

Please let me know what works best with your schedule. Note that October 11
is the same date as our pre-interview reception.

We look forward to working with you on this.

Thanks,
Cindy Justice
x57339

---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Justice/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000 03:35
PM ---------------------------

Celeste Roberts
07/05/2000 11:57 AM
To: Cindy Justice/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vince Kaminski's Oct. 11 Presentation -- "Enron Day at the Energy
Finance Program"

Can you guys followup with him to coordinate an Enron reception following a
presentation that Vince Kaminiski will give during their annual UT
Foundations of Energy Finance class.  We do want to do this, and of course
need to coordinate with Vince and your dates on campus to ensure that we have
no conflicts.

I am not sure if this falls into the Associate or Analyst camp.  You can best
determine who the appropriate contact should be.  Leave me an e-mail to
confirm.

Celeste
---------------------- Forwarded by Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
11:47 AM ---------------------------

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 07/05/2000 10:35:57 AM
To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vince Kaminski's Oct. 11 Presentation -- "Enron Day at the  Energy
Finance Program"

Celeste,

Greetings.

As you may recall, I am the Director of the Univ. of Texas Center for
Energy Finance (CEFER).  I would like at this time to initiate planning for
your colleague Vince Kaminski's annual presentation to the UT Foundations
of Energy Finance class which I will be presenting as usual the first half
of the Fall Semester.

Thus, to begin, I wonder whether either the above is your current e-mail
account, and, with the departure of Meryl Barnett (with whom I believe we
coordinated this in the past), whether this is an issue within your scope.

With respect to this reception, I appreciate that there may be other Enron
receptions scheduled for this Fall.  However, if you so choose, I would
like to afford you the opportunity of scheduling an Enron reception
following Vince's presentation.  If you would indeed like to do so, I
suggest we coordinate with Vince the date for the presentation/reception.

Sincerely,
Ehud

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Professor of Finance
     Director, Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


We agree with the Nom. for 3/19/01.
---------------------- Forwarded by David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US on 03/20/2001
01:24 PM ---------------------------

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/20/2001 10:05:59 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM,
LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  NOMS/ACTUAL FLOW FOR 3/19/01

DATE      NOM       MCF       MMBTU
3/19/01        60,000         59,944          61,562

BTU = 1.027


Can I change my deals or are they calcing in risk?

   Kate Symes                04/18/2001 03:56 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sierra pacific industries

I've changed deals 581499 and 581605 to Sierra Pacific Power. They're suposed
to be transmission deals, they were just in with the wrong counterparty name.
And thanks again for working so hard to finalize this Sierra Pacific Holding
Co. thing.

Kate

Rhonda L Denton
04/18/2001 01:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Sierra pacific industries

Kate, I am changing the forwards to the HOlding Company.  There are 2
transmission deals with Sierra Pacific Industries that I think should be
Buy/Resales.  We do not have transmission with either entity.  Can you check
and see if the counterparty should be changed or they should be Buy/Resales?
Thanks.


Karla:

Please inform Henwood that Enron will renew the license for the Prosym
software modules but will not renew the licenses for North American databases.
The software modules to be renewed are:
Base System (Prosym?) (ECOsym is included in the base system)
ASAP/MSTAT
MULTISYM
EMSS interface.

It is not 100% sure that the last module is required. Nevertheless, please
begin the agreement amendment process asap.  I will let you know if there are
modifications soon.

Thanks,
Grant.


For your information, attached is the Enron Global Markets LLC Monthly Legal
Report for January 2001.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Regards, Alan


BOOK ID    AGG-GASII LOCATION
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-BAS   FT-CANADA-BAS
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-PRC   FT-CANADA-PRC
FT-HPLC-BAS    IM-TEXAS-BAS
FT-HPLC-PRC   IM-TEXAS-PRC
FT-INT-CEN-MKT-GDL  IM-CENTRAL-PHY
FT-US/CAND-ERMS-GDL  FT-CANADA-GDL

Susan D Trevino
11/21/2000 03:51 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ganapathy
Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Differences in Portfolio!

Robin - please let me know where to place these books.  Per Bilal, they need
to be done today.

Thanks,
Susan

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
03:48 PM ---------------------------

Bilal Bajwa
11/21/2000 03:40 PM
To: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Differences in Portfolio!

I compared the different portfolios in RisktRac and came up with the
following changes. Hopefully this would help eliminate some of the
differences amongst the different portfolios ....

FT-Peoples needs to be removed from P Keavey - Currently it is being double
counted in P Keavey and J Williams.

The following books to be added to AGG-GASII
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-BAS
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-PRC
FT-HPLC-BAS
FT-HPLC-PRC
FT-INT-CEN-MKT-GDL

These books to be added to AGG-GASIV, AGG-GASIII and Canada
FT-US/CAND-ERMS-GDL (Under J_McKay - Robin please confirm)

Please let me know if you have any other suggestions/comments to help solve
this problem as soon as possible.

Bilal


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/11/2000 07:56 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           10/10/2000 09:21 AM

To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Amir Ahanchian/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:
Subject: GAME @ 9 on Wed

Let me know whether or not you will come.


Call-in Information:  800-711-8000
Pass Code:  6349#


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Niniejszym potwierdzam, ze nastepujacy studenci zlozyli prace dyplomowe:

Jerzy Seremak  PREZENTACJA  INSTRUMENT?W  ANALIZY FINANSOWEJ  JAKO
PODSTAWA     OCENY  WYBRANEGO PODMIOTU
W  KR?TKIM  I  DLUGIM OKRESIE  CZASU              Ocena: Bardzo dobra

WALDEMAR MR?Z  CONTROLLING W PRZEDSIOBIORSTWIE     Ocena: Bardzo dobra

T. Blach  Analiza wskaznikowa    Ocena: Bardzo dobra

W. Kaminski


Hello GOD-

Do you really call yourself God?  That is pitiful-not surprising though.
Okay, I have taken care of Mike at AES.  They should be able to transact on
US East Pwr Fin by tomorrow afternoon.  Credit will open them up tonight.  I
left my number with him, but let me know if he calls you with any other
problems.

My Easter was great-I had way too much to eat.  I am feeling a little large
today.  I can't believe you had to work on Easter...I probably ate enough for
both of us.  Who needs Megawatt.  Everyone knows that God does everything
first.  Don't blame it on us Power Girls, we rock the house...

adriane

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Joe Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@ECT
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Joe+20Stepenovitch_Corp_Enron+40ECT@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Adriane Schultea/NA/Enron@ECT
Subject: Re: Balance of the Day

Good Morning,

Did you have a nice Easter??  I had to work.....(so you can guess how mine
was!)  Could you or Theresa call (AES New Energy) this morning, they are
having trouble with EOL and the Master user.  Your contact will be (Mike @
617-960-7294)  thanks and let me know what happens...Your the Best!!  By the
way I'm upset with you two!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Did you see Megawatt Daily
today???  Why didn't we do that??  Now it looks like we were second!..Not
Good for GOD!  Anyway are you on AIM?  My IM is (stepo90) keep me in the
loop....

Have a good day,

-me

Adriane Schultea@ECT
03/28/2001 10:16 AM
To: Joe Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Balance of the Day

In case you don't recognize my name- I am Adriane Moratto, but just changed
my name after the wedding.  Just wanted to catch up with you and see how
things were going with the new product.  Seems to be a success.  Let me know
if you have any other guys you want me to call or if there is anything else I
can do to get you some more players.

adriane


I talked with Linda Swoy at Teco and got the information we needed and have
already passed it on to Bernie.  Thanks
Ben


I changed the price on deal 145638.  I show we should make about $19,000.00.
Let me know what you see,.


Ron,

Your e-mail was such a pleasant surprise!  Thanks so much for the kind words.

I would love to get together for lunch in the near future, though January is
typically a tough month for me.  I'll have my assistant, Sherri Sera, call
your office to see what we can arrange.

Thanks again for the note.  I look forward to seeing you soon.

Jeff


Dear Colleague:

We are honored to have Chairman Pat Wood of the Public Utility Commission of
Texas as the distinguish speaker for the meeting of the Central Texas Chapter
of the United States Association for Energy Economics.  Chairman Wood is the
main architect of electric industry restructuring in Texas and this meeting
offers a unique opportunity to hear his speech entitled:

"Texas' Future Competitive Electric Industry"

Please mark your calendars and join us on Wednesday, November 29 at 5:00 PM
at the Lower Colorado River Authority's Board Room, Located at 3700 Lake
Austin Blvd (Hancock Building), Austin, Texas.  The meeting will open with
refreshments and Chairman Wood's presentation will begin at 5:30 PM.  The
meeting is open to the public and is free. We extend a special invitation to
all members of the USAEE that reside in the central Texas area. Please plan
to meet David DeAngelo, President of USAEE, who we are fortunate to have as
our special guest. David will be happy to answer any questions you have about
the IAEE and USAEE.

About the CTAEE

The Central Texas Association for Energy Economics (CTAEE) focuses on current
energy events and research at the state, national, and international level.
It is an excellent forum to meet, network, and exchange ideas in the regional
energy community.  Local programs will be held six to eight times a year.

The CTAEE is a local chapter of an international association known as the
International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE).  CTAEE is a non-profit
organization and is a totally non-partisan forum for stimulating discussion
and dialogue on major energy policy and analysis issues.  To provide
exceptional meeting topics and dialogue we need your local membership.  Your
participation in CTAEE can bring new ideas to help promote effective energy
policy.

About the IAEE and USAEE

The International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE), founded in 1977,
provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, experience and issues among
professionals interested in energy economics. Its scope is worldwide, as are
its members, who come from diverse backgrounds -- corporate, academic,
scientific, and government. The United States Association for Energy
Economics (USAEE) is an affiliate of the International Association for Energy
Economics.  As a member of IAEE you will gain a broader understanding of
energy economics, policymaking and theory. Members are kept well informed by
IAEE and USAEE publications and conferences on events within the energy
industry and energy challenges that lie ahead. Furthermore, membership
provides you with the opportunity to network within the largest association
of energy professionals in the world.

Mina M. Dioun, Ph.D.                 Neil
McAndrews                            Karl J. Nalepa
CTAEE President                        CTAEE Vice President
CTAEE Treasurer
(512) 473-3333 x-2549                 (512)
415-3227                            (512) 463-8574
mdioun@lcra.org  nmcandrew@austin.rr.com
karl.nalepa@rrc.state.tx.us

 - ctaee-Meeting.doc


Ron,

We are interviewing Brent Dornier for a position on the West gas trading desk and understand that he worked for you in the past.  We seek an individual who possesses exceptional computer skills, is able to complete projects with very little guidance, and has some commercial awareness.  Is Brent our man?

Keith Holst
713-853-7069