agree

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

O.K.  I will inquire along the lines you suggest.  It would be pretty good to know if they're just making a political statement and have no intention of pushing it, if, e.g., FERC approves the ALJ's order in the PNW case.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Think the best thing is to let it ride - no sense in discussing because we don't have a solution for them.  See if any intelligence on how hard they are going to push NPCo to fight us.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:21 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

I'm going to Carson City tomorrow.  I thought I could present the following message to the Commissioners:

Contracts were negotiated in a bilateral market at arm's length.  Nobody was requiring NPCo to do business with us.  Similar contracts were upheld by the ALJ in the PNW refunds case.  You're going to completely screw up forward markets and NPCo's ability to contract in the future.  Think of the risk premium that will attach to future contracts.
We tried to be the good guy with NPCo by offering a more comprehensive solution for them numerous times.  Now we're getting attacked for their mistakes?
We have met with NPCo a number of times to try and resolve this issue.  But the resolution requires that they post collateral.  Now they won't even talk with us.  The only way you (PUCN) are going to fix this is if you step up and require the utilities to post collateral when necessary.

However, after talking with Steve Hall I concluded that it would be unwise at this point for me to contact the Commissioners.  We don't have anything to offer and very little new to say.   For example, according to Steve, we won't touch a blend and extend because of credit problems.  This said, he was uncomfortable saying that the entire issue was collateral.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 1:52 PM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Trying to put something together.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 1:11 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Always.  By the way, did you have further thoughts about a call to develop a comprehensive Nevada strategy?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Are we still friends??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Thanks.  I hate it when I sound petulant.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Kaufman, Paul; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

My fault for not making it clear that you should have been in the loop.  We will send out a message across the board to help with this.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

This is going to sound like empire building. But I need to know what we're doing with PGE.  I don't need to participate in the calls--but I do need to know.  The PGE folks need to have confidence that I'm aware of our positions and plans.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

We are having a conference call tomorrow with PGE.  They did not decide anything on the last conference call after I told them why Enron retail in the East likes the Duquense type imbalance (no bandwidth, thus no penalties-- imbalances settle at verifiable system lambda).  John Malowney of EPMI west desk likes the bandwidth, but we are discussing it further since it has created problems for the East EES desk (due to the penalties associated with being outside the bandwidth).  John likes the PGE proposal to settle at an index price, but PGE is reconsidering that aspect.

Unfortunately, I don't know of any TPs that allow a bandwidth without penalties.

Let me know if you want to participate in the call.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	PGE Imbalance Charge

Christi --

What's the latest on the PGE imbalance method??

Jim


Patricia has asked who should be included in the group for Wednesday, March
1.  Do you and Andrea want to be included?  Any commercial people?


She has a mostly white one - at least those are the color of the kitty hairs
on my clothes.  She left his front claws in because she said it was mean to
take them out.  Of course she gets a little angry when he sharpens his claws
on the couch.  I figure he will get run over by a car someday and she will be
said - I will be sensitive and caring and then she'll get another one.

I guess I don't have to tell you that those long distance relationships are
kinda tough.  Good luck.

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 03:37:45 PM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: How's your back???

What kind of kitty does Ingrid have??

Rob is fine... we had a little tiff and didn't talk for a week. He went to
the LDC forum in Boston. We made up over e-mail today... or at least
exchanged apologies. I'm not sure when I'll see him again. Gloria is
visiting me next weekend... girls night out. The following weekend Cindy is
visiting me. The weekend after that I'll be in Houston for TCO shipper
meeting. It has been two weeks since I've seen him. We have a great time
when we are together, it just hasn't been very often latetly.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 4:28 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: RE: How's your back???

I'll ask my woman her opinion about my rock hard stomach.  I'm sure she
will agree after I tell her what to see.  I guess women can be sensitive.

Ingrid's fine - and you?  How's your man?

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 02:47:42 PM

To:   "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: How's your back???

My last response didn't make sense... now that I re-read it. I meant to see
I like a cat personality better.

I'm sorry about the cushy remark... I'm guessing you have worked out a
lot... since I last saw you. It's probably rock hard now.

So how is ingrid??

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 2:14 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: RE: How's your back???

You like (cat) attitude don't you?  And what makes you think my stomach is
cushy??????

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 12:58:44 PM

To:   "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: How's your back???

I'm guessing your stomach is nice and cushy.... not rock hard. Your
women...
ingrid???

I'm not getting a hamster!!! They have no personality like a cat.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:56 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: RE: How's your back???

Why don't you get a hamster or something like that.   You know my woman has
a cat - he likes sleeping on my firm, rockhard stomach when I watch TV.

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 12:41:55 PM

To:   "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: How's your back???

I planted 50 plus flowers this weekend in my flower boxes. They look so
pretty. I hope I don't kill them. I'm going to find me some kittens in the
next few weeks. I'm lonely without Miss Muffy. Cindy Vachuska is coming to
visit me in two weekends. I'm taking May 4th off.. we are going to do some
museums, day to the eastern shore, and baltimore's inner harbor.

Bidweek is such a joy!!! We are suppose to be back online with y'all... so
they say.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:31 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: Re: How's your back???

How sweet.  Its doing ok.  A better question is "how's the lovelife?".
That's doing ok too - although I wish I could find the perfect woman.  Mine
is wanting to take some trips - Maine, New York, EUROPE!!!!!

What's up with you girl?

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 12:13:11 PM

To:   "'Chris Germany'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  How's your back???

See.... I'm being nice and not asking any other questions.

Hope you're doing okay.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


larry's uncle had some but they are like $50.


This worked also.

Rosalee

"Jack Tompkins" <jtompkins@iexalt.net> on 09/28/2000 01:17:13 PM
Please respond to "Jack Tompkins" <jtompkins@iexalt.net>
To: "Sharon Kimmel" <skimmel@iexalt.net>
cc: "William W. Piernot" <piernotb@letu.edu>, "William G. Trulove"
<williamgtrulove@ev1.net>, "Walter A. Saunders, Jr."
<walter_saunders@agc.com>, "Robert N. Dietz" <bdietz@bflassociates.com>,
"Ripley E. Woodard, Jr." <rew@whplaw.com>, "Ray Daugbjerg"
<105113.2130@compuserve.com>, "Rand R. Wall" <heritage@wt.net>, "R.
Christopher Wyatt" <cwyatt@dttus.com>, "Peter Forbes"
<pforbes@houston.rr.com>, "Paul Widener" <bluesky@ghg.net>, "Michael Hensley"
<MikeH@tescodrilling.com>, "Marcus Watts" <mwatts@lockeliddell.com>, "Leo
Linbeck" <eva_quearry@linbeck.com>, "Lee Pardue, II" <lpardue@att.net>, "Kyle
Bergeron" <emalliance@aol.com>, "Ken Lay" <kenneth.lay@enron.com>, "Joel
Tietjens" <Joel@tjens.com>, "Joe Richardson" <jrichardson@harperpearson.com>,
"Jim Wise" <banbury3419@hotmail.com>, "Jere M. Ahrens" <jahrens@dttus.com>,
"Jeff L. Murray" <jeffm@netlan-inc.com>, "James W. Hargrove"
<jwhargrove@pdq.net>, "James Shirley" <jrshirly@flash.net>, "Jack Miller"
<jack.miller@basshotels.com>, "J. Wise" <ban_bury@swbell.net>, "J. P. Wise"
<jpwise@ielectric.com>, "J. Evans Attwell" <eattwell@velaw.com>, "Frank
Vandiver" <fvandiver@sterlingchemicals.com>, "Doug Bech"
<dbech@raintreesorts.com>, "Dennis McGuire" <mcguired@tpi-sourcing.com>,
"David Smith" <DavidHillSmith@worldnet.att.net>, "David Cullum"
<cullum_david@msn.com>, "D. Stephen Goddard, Jr."
<d.stephen.goddard.jr@us.arthurandersen.com>, "Charles W. Hall"
<chall@fulbright.com>, "Charles Beall" <anne.b@worldnet.att.net>, "Bruce J.
Harper" <bharper@harperpearson.com>, "Bill Wright" <billw3@hypercon.com>,
"Barry G. Flynn" <bgflynn@swbell.net>, "R. Oliver" <rwoliver@txpetrochem.com>
Subject: Re: TEST

Test works.? Thanks.
?
Anything else to do ?
?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From:  Sharon Kimmel
To: Jack Tompkins
Cc: William W. Piernot ; William G.  Trulove ; Walter A. Saunders, Jr. ;
Robert  N. Dietz ; Ripley E.  Woodard, Jr. ; Ray Daugbjerg ; Rand R. Wall ;
R. Christopher Wyatt  ; Peter  Forbes ; Paul  Widener ; Michael Hensley ;
Marcus  Watts ; Leo Linbeck ; Lee Pardue, II ; Kyle Bergeron ;  Ken Lay  ;
Joel Tietjens ; Joe Richardson ; Jim  Wise ; Jere M.  Ahrens ; Jeff L. Murray
; James W.  Hargrove ; James Shirley ; Jack  Miller ; J.  Wise ; J.  P. Wise
; J.  Evans Attwell ; Frank Vandiver ; Doug  Bech ; Dennis McGuire ; David
Smith ; David Cullum  ; D. Stephen Goddard, Jr. ;  Charles W.  Hall ; Charles
Beall ; Bruce  J. Harper ; Bill Wright ; Barry G. Flynn ;  R.  Oliver
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 11:42  AM
Subject: TEST

?
Sharon


fyi - I don't have any idea if this will be routed in accordance with the "process" for ENA brokerage agreements

Do you care?  This is the second such brokerage agreement coming from Gil.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Melman, Gil M.
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 11:33 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Sale of Catalytica Shares by JSB Asset LLC

we're handling and getting resolutions in place.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 11:28 AM
To:	Melman, Gil M.
Cc:	Carson, Rick L.; Lowry, Donna; Rohauer, Tanya
Subject:	FW: Sale of Catalytica Shares by JSB Asset LLC

Gil:

Will you be handling the documentation?  Does JSB Asset, LLC have an authorized trader list? a resolution to open the account?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Melman, Gil M.
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Rohauer, Tanya
Cc:	Charania, Aneela; Funk, Brenda L.; Ephross, Joel; Mckillop, Gordon; Heinitz, Mary J.; Johnson, Pat; Lydecker Jr., Richard
Subject:	Sale of Catalytica Shares by JSB Asset LLC

 Yesterday we entered into a trade with CSFB for the block sale of our shares of common stock of Catalytica, a public company.  The shares are held in JSB Asset LLC. We now have to set up an account with CSFB on behalf of JSB Asset, LLC to consummate  the sale of our shares in Catalytica.  PLease note that the trade occurred yesterday so we are now in documentation stage.  We will most likely terminate the account immediately upon conclusion of the transaction.

 Brenda and Joel--any problems with us setting up an account with CSFB for JSB Asset LLC?

Also note that I ran this by our internal and external counsel handling the investigations and these transactions in Catalytica do not create any issues relevant to the investigation.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Charania, Aneela
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Parnizari, Lori
Cc:	Melman, Gil M.
Subject:	FW: Account Documentation.

Hey,

We have decided that it would be best to set up an account at CSFB.  I think you guys are already working on everything else, but we will need to additionally complete the customer account agreement and W-9.  Once everything is complete, can you please send me copies for our records.

Also, we are still pending an okay from Donna Lowry.

Thanks!
Aneela
:-)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kearns, Neil" <neil.kearns@csfb.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 10:17 AM
To:	Charania, Aneela
Cc:	Melman, Gil M.
Subject:	Account Documentation.

 <<W9.pdf>>  <<custacc combined.pdf>>  <<IRREVOCABLE STOCK POWER.doc>>
<<144k Seller rep let.doc>>
Please fill out (as best you can) and sign the W9, Corporate Resolution,
Customer Agreement, Stock Power and 144k Sellers Rep. Letter.  Please fax
them to my attention at 212-325-8072 and FedEx the originals also to my
attention at
Credit Suisse First Boston
11 Madison Avenue
New York, N.Y.  10010
ECM, 3rd. Floor
Do not hesitate to call me with any questions.  Thank you.

		Neil Kearns
		Director
		Equity Capital Markets
		CREDIT SUISSE  | FIRST BOSTON
		neil.kearns@csfb.com
		TEL. (212) 325 2981
		Fax. (212) 325 8072

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - W9.pdf << File: W9.pdf >>
 - custacc combined.pdf << File: custacc combined.pdf >>
 - IRREVOCABLE STOCK POWER.doc << File: IRREVOCABLE STOCK POWER.doc >>
 - 144k Seller rep let.doc << File: 144k Seller rep let.doc >>


The Staff Assessment for the Hanford Energy Park Peaker Project is
now available on our website.  please go to:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/peakers/hanford/documents/

Bob Aldrich

--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
If you would like to unsubscribe from this
list.  Please use our form located at:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/html/listservers.html

Bob Aldrich
Webmaster
California Energy Commission

* * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * *


Start Date: 3/4/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030423.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/4/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/4/01
  TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Spoke w/ Skilling re OI "binary" decision. He is willing to enter into the
deal. His rational is that he thinks we will be ok on OWC in the final
analysis. He did  say to reserve for the deal adequately and structure it as
appropriate for the circumstances. He also wanted to know if there is
anything different here than on OWC. I told him that it wasn't significantly
different (both strong underlying businesses with huge event risk attached)

Lets get dash completed and then I will voice mail Jeff w/ specifics and get
his verbal signature.

Rick


The Global Contracts Meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 24, 2000, at
12:00 in 46C1.  Lunch will be served.


Any comments you may have would be appreciated.  I need to get this out by
tommorrow.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 01:39 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	08/31/2000 12:15 PM

		 To: Dan J Bump/DEN/ECT@Enron, kckrisa@apex2000.net, Mark Whitt@ECT,
ccarver@alfers-carver.com
		 cc: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Arvel Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Gray
		 Subject: Wildhorse Letter

Attached is a letter to Wildhorse concerning curtailment of the Dakota
Production.  Please review and provide comments asap.


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

2/1/2002 5:00:00 PM through 2/4/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Sat 2/2/2002 5:30:00 PM CT thru Sat 2/2/2002 7:30:00 PM CT
	Sat 2/2/2002 3:30:00 PM PT thru Sat 2/2/2002 5:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 2/2/2002 11:30:00 PM London thru Sun 2/3/2002 1:30:00 AM London
Outage:   Maintenance of NAHOU-SQUFY04S & 05S
Environments Impacted:   Estate Unify Production.
Purpose:   Preventive maintenance on two cluster member servers.
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Skinner, Tony  713-345-9334
	Jordan, Mark  713-286-5308
	Warner, John  713-345-1756

Impact:   EES
Time:   Fri 2/1/2002 3:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/1/2002 11:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 2/1/2002 1:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/1/2002 9:00:00 PM PT
	Fri 2/1/2002 9:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/2/2002 5:00:00 AM London
Outage:   Upgrade EESHOU-DBRGS from NT 40 to W2K server
Environments Impacted:   SQL database
Purpose:   Server needs to be upgraded to windows 2000 and SQL 2000 to meet corp standards
Backout:   Restore original configuration from tape backup
Contact(s):   Nguyen, James  713-345-6137

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Thur 1/31/2002 5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/1/2002 7:00:00 AM CT
	Thur 1/31/2002 3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/1/2002 5:00:00 AM PT
	Thur 1/31/2002 11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 2/1/2002 1:00:00 PM London
Outage:   Replace disk on Envision
Environments Impacted:   Corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices.
Purpose:   Maintenance is needed to repair bad disk
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Vollmer, Mary  713-853-3381
	Rye, Gregory  713-345-3022

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Sat 2/2/2002 6:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 2/2/2002 9:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 2/2/2002 4:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 2/2/2002 7:00:00 AM PT
	Sat 2/2/2002 12:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/2/2002 3:00:00 PM London
Outage:   Reindex Envision database
Environments Impacted:   Corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices.
Purpose:   Maintenance needed to correct performance issues
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Vollmer, Mary  713-853-3381
	Rye, Gregory  713-345-3022


For those of you trying to keep track of the exhibit lists in this case, here
is the most recent update of the exhibit list for the Comprehensive
Settlement Agreement.? For those preparing rebuttal, please identify your
testimony as such for consistency purposes.? John Burkholder, who was
originally identified as filing exhibit 19, will not be filing rebuttal.?
Eric Nelson, who will be rebutting the testimony of Powerspring, will file as
exhibit 19.

FILED EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1?? Comprehensive Settlement Document??
Exhibit 2?? Lad Lorenz Testimony
Exhibit 3?? Eric Nelson Testimony
Exhibit 4?? Mark Pocta Testimony
Exhibit 5?? Tom Beach Testimony
Exhibit 6?? Jeff Dasovich Testimony
Exhibit 7?? Rick Counihan Testimony
Exhibit 8?? John Burkholder Testimony
Exhibit 9?? Paul Amirault Testimony
Exhibit 10? Jeanne Zaiontz Testimony
Exhibit 11? Paul McKelvey Testimony
Exhibit 12? Jeff Fawcett Testimony
Exhibit 13? Errata to Comprehensive Settlement Document

NEW EXHIBITS
Exhibit 14? Rebuttal Testimony of Lad Lorenz
Exhibit 15? Rebuttal Testimony of Jeff Dasovich
Exhibit 16? Rebuttal Testimony of Paul Amirault
Exhibit 17? Rebuttal Testimony of Jeff Fawcett
Exhibit 18? Rebuttal Testimony of Tom Beach
Exhibit 19? Rebuttal Testimony of Eric Nelson
Exhibit 20? Rebuttal Testimony of Rick Counihan


Talked to Hyvl.  This agreement is o.k. for EOL.

	Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
	04/11/2001 11:16 AM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL question

Attorney: Dan Hyvl
Originator: Debra Perlingiere

From: Stacy E Dickson@ECT on 04/11/2001 11:14 AM
To: Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EOL question

Cyndie,

Do you know who initialed this agreement?  I want to talk to him/her about
this provision.

	Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
	04/06/2001 02:09 PM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Susan Elledge/NA/Enron@Enron, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: EOL question

Long time since I placed one of these to you. . .

Okay,
NORTHEAST GAS MARKETS, LLC; An EOL approved CP (Investment Grade); We have
have a new GISB [Choice of Law = NY] & a Special provision (13.10) that I
haven't come across yet whereas  - - - - - -  Enron recognizes that NEGM is
acting as buyer on behalf of certain companies ("Repurchasers") to who it
immediately resells such gas at the Delivery  Points, The Parties further
agree that the term "transporter" shall include any company acting in the
capacity of a transporter for any Repurchaser & agree that 4.3 will apply to
invoices from such Transporters for Imbalance Charges received. - - - - - I
can't see any reasons why this should cause this GISB to be excluded from EOL
transactions, but wanted to make sure that there wasn't some deeper intent
for the special provision that we would want to keep On-line transactions on
GTCs.

Anything we should beware of?

Gee, almost feels just like old times. :o)

Thanks!
Cyn


Marty:  I will have a response to setoff shortly.  With respect to the CSA
and calculation of the "Credit Support Amount," our change should not create
any inconsistencies in the calculation of that amount among your
counterparties since it would only change IF the calculation yielded a
negative number.  The only reason for "specifying otherwise" in Paragraph 13
is to capture the situation where the Pledgor MIGHT be holding Independent
Amounts (if there are ever any specified in a particular Transaction) of the
Secured Party as cushion (which is not meant to be returned until termination
of Transactions) and subtraction of that amount would create a negative
number when calculating the Credit Support Amount.  By specifying that the
Credit Support Amount will be "the higher of" the amount calculated (deemed
to be zero if a negative number) or the sum of the Pledgor's Independent
Amounts, the latter would prevail.  This calculation method will make a
difference if, for example, the Secured Party asks for a Return Amount when
the Pledgor intends to retain any Independent Amounts as cushion (such that
only Posted Credit Support exceeding the sum of the Independent Amounts will
be returned).  I hope this helps.  Sara

Marty_Oelmann@cargill.com on 04/18/2000 04:53:26 PM
To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc: Marty_Oelmann@cargill.com
Subject: Re: ISDA Master Agreement between Enron and CGLI

     Hi Sara,
     Confirming or conversation, only 2 issues remain unresolved.

     1.  Please remove subclause (B) in Part 5(g) Setoff.  As we discussed,
         this contemplates including all kinds of "obligations of any kind
         whatsoever" and it is our intent to include only Energy trading
         under this Agreement.

     2.  Please explain the reasoning for modifying the definition of
         "Credit Support Amount" in Paragraph 13(b)(C) of the Credit
         Support Annex.  We would prefer to retain the intent of ISDA's
         definition to maintain consistency in the way this amount is
         determined among our counterparties.

     Thank you for all your assistance and I look forward to receiving
     execution copies of the Agreement if these two issues can be resolved.

     Best regards,
     Marty Oelmann

______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement
Author:  Sara.Shackleton (Sara.Shackleton@enron.com) at admpom01-unix-mime
Date:    4/18/00 4:01 PM

Marty:  Also left you a voice mail.  Are we ready to send execution copies?
Sara


Today after the Hearing I attended lunch with John Anderson and Phil Harris.  One of the primary points of discussion involved what to do to respond to the NERC legislative efforts?

Basically we agreed that a straightforward delegation of authority over reliability to FERC made sense for all of the groups.  Agreeing to that, the idea is to review the Bingaman language and see if our groups could agree to that language.

I think that internally Enron is already there???  John Shelk, if you could pls send out the language to everyone on this e-mail to get agreement that would be very helpful.

I'll let you know how we next proceed.  If anyone has any problems, please let me know.

Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/10/2000
01:56 PM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich on 08/10/2000 10:12:20 AM
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman@EES, Robert Badeer@ECT, Tim Belden@ECT,
Dave Parquet@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Hain@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Governor's Press Conference -- Shot Across the Bow

There appears to be a pattern forming.  The administration seems to make a
scene just prior to large events (e.g., Davis' letters calling for wholesale
caps just prior to the ISO Board vote, and now this on the eve of the joint
Assembly/Senate hearing scheduled for today).

In other late-breaking news.  On the heels of this press conference, I
received late last evening from Loretta Lynch's chief of staff a copy of a
proposed decision Lynch will release today reversing last Thursday's decision
rejecting (0-5) retail price caps in San Diego.  The draft decision she
proposes would establish an "interim" retail rate cap only for SDG&E
residential and small commercial customers.  She proposes to use a "balancing
account" to finance the cap.  Though it looks like the "interim" cap would
extend through December 2003, there is one place in the decision that states
the cap should only extend through December 2000.

"Karen Edson" <kedson@ns.net> on 08/09/2000 06:58:13 PM
To: "Baker Carolyn (E-mail)" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bill Carlson
(E-mail)" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Bill Woods (E-mail)"
<billw@calpine.com>, "Curt Hatton (E-mail)" <curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>,
"Curtis Kebler (E-mail)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "David Keane
(E-mail)" <dnke@dynegy.com>, "David Parquet (E-mail)"
<dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Duane Nelsen (E-mail)" <duanenelsen@msn.com>, "Ed
Tomeo (E-mail)" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Edward Maddox (E-mail)"
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Eileen Kock (E-mail)" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"Ellery Bob (E-mail)" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Escalante Bob (E-mail)"
<riobravogm@aol.com>, "Frank DeRosa (E-mail)"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Greg Blue (E-mail)" <gtbl@dynegy.com>,
"Hap Boyd (E-mail)" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott (E-mail)"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Jan Smunty-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jim
Willey (E-mail)" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Joe Greco (E-mail)"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Joe Ronan (E-mail)" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout
(E-mail)" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "Katie Kaplan (E-mail)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Kent Fickett
(E-mail)" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"Marty McFadden (E-mail)" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Paula Soos
(E-mail)" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Robert Lamkin (E-mail)"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Roger Pelote (E-mail)"
<rpelote@energy.twc.com>, "Steve Ponder (E-mail)" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>, "Tony Wetzel (E-mail)" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Trond
Aschehoug (E-mail)" <taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "William Hall (E-mail)"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Richard Hyde (E-mail)" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"Sandi McCubbin (E-mail)" <smccubbi@ees.enron.com>, "Stephanie Newell
(E-mail)" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Glenn R. Etienne (E-mail)"
<gret@dynegy.com>, "Nick Wallace (E-mail)" <njwa@dynegy.com>
cc: "Ann Kelly (E-mail)" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Bev Hansen (E-mail)"
<bhansen@lhom.com>, "Bob Judd (E-mail)" <caltech@ns.net>, "Govenar Scott
(E-mail)" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Hedy Govenar (E-mail)"
<hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Levake Barbara (E-mail)" <blevake@syix.com>, "Monagan
Mike (E-mail)" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Rob Ross (E-mail)" <robbiz@cwo.com>,
"Ron Tom (E-mail)" <rtom@govadv.com>, "Rudman Cary (E-mail)"
<cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Susan McCabe (E-mail)" <sfmccabe@mindspring.com>
Subject: Governor's Press Conference -- Shot Across the Bow

Governor Davis held a press conference today at which he accused
"out-of-state generators" of price gouging and market manipulation.  He
called on FERC to expedite their investigation of the market and to provide
for consumer rebates if FERC cannot conclude that California prices are
"just and reasonable."

Below are my notes from the press conference.  Attached is the Governor's
press release.

Karen Edson

Notes from Gov. Davis, Press Conference:

Opening Statement
Record hot temperatures; lack of supply; price manipulation have created the
crisis.
Electricity is the life blood of the State's economy.
He (the Governor) has responded with several recent steps.
Among them is his request that the AG & FERC examine price manipulation

1st Point
He is calling on the CPUC to establish a price stability rate for consumers
and business.
His intent is to reduce rates to $55-$65/mo. for next year or two.  (This
point was unclear.  Did he mean rates, bills, or what?)
Customers need predictable, reliable, affordable rates

2nd Point
The Governor called on President Clinton and Chairman Hoecker to expedite an
investigation of the unconscionable rates being charged by out-of-state
generators to California utilities
The Governor wants FERC to make evidentiary findings that rates are just and
reasonable.  If FERC can,t make such findings, he wants them to require
consumer rebates.  (This portion of his comments is not reflected in the
attached press release.  It is taken right from the script of Senator Steve
Peace.)

3rd Point
Believes deregulation will work. Generators must be held responsible.  When
gouging and extorting; you must pay the price.

Karen Edson
kedson@ns.net
916/552-7070
 - A. GOVERNOR Press Release 8-10.doc


Good to hear from you and thanks again for the baby gift - much appreciated.  The family is great - Caitlin just turned 3 and Dane is now 4 months old.

I hope Fran and the kids are doing great - how's your new addition?   We will be going to Miami Sept 13-16 (Miami revenge on Washington) and hopefully we can hook up for a beer.

As far as the guy from Citizens - we really don't know that much about him.   Where is Tony Altman - under a bus somewhere?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	John_Mantyh@fpl.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-John+5FMantyh+40fpl+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:14 PM
To:	kpresto@enron.com
Subject:	Johhy Gant's E-mail Address

Kevin:

I got your voice mail this morning.  I've heard of snail-mail, but that
kind of delay really is impressive!  I thought maybe the package got lost,
or more likely, pilfered by one of your unscrupulous co-workers (just
kidding).

In any case, now you have my e-mail address.

Also, we have a new president of the unregulated trading shop (if you can
call what we do "trading") - Mark Maisto from Citizens.  Seems like a sharp
guy.  Do you know anything about him?

How's Evelyn, Katlin Page and the new one doing (I forgot his name - Kevin
Jr.?).

-  JDM


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/26/2001 07:35 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	01/26/2001 07:30 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
"Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kassandra Gough"
<kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap
Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane
Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Craig Chancellor"
<craigc@calpine.com>, "Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Kate
Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Andy Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>,
"Doug Kerner" <runwithmee@aol.com>, "Chris Ellison" <CTE@eslawfirm.com>,
<chudson@iepa.com>
		 Subject: Legislative Status Report Week Ending 1/26

Date: 1/26/01
To: Jan Smutny-Jones, Steven Kelly, Katie Kaplan
From: Julee Malinowski-Ball, Edson + Modisette
RE: Legislative Status Report Week Ending 1/26

RECENT EVENTS:

-- AB 1x (Keeley), which would authorize DWR to procure power for California
utilities and consumers, passed out of the Senate Energy Committee this
week.  The language which stated that any entity supplying power to DWR
would be considered a public utility was deleted from the bill.  After the
bibding information came in from the DWR RFP, the 5.5 cent cap was also
deleted from the bill.  In its place was inserted language stating the goal
of DWR was to procure power at the lowest price possible per kWh.  The
author and committee chair agreed this bill would not address any broader
issues associated with undercollections and stranded costs.  The measure was
heard in the Senate Appropriations today, but will not be voted on until
Monday when the committee meets again at 10 am.  The amended version is
still not in print.

-- AB 18x (Hertzberg) was introduced this week that would take the issues
addressed in AB 1x further.  This measure would also authorize DWR to enter
into contracts for the purchase or sale of electricity for California
utilities and consumers.  Additionally, however, the measure addresses
undercollections and going-forward costs.  Much of the debate in today,s
Assembly Energy Cost and Availability Committee was focused on whether or
not the utility has reasonable costs that should be recovered.  The
committee agreed after a lengthy debate that this bill may want to sent up a
mechanism for answering this question.   The most shocking statement made
during the debate was when PG&E estimated their &net8 undercollections was
$8.2 billion.

IEP member company generators have drafted comments and amendments on AB 18x
and have submitted them to the committee for consideration.  The crux of
these comments is the concern that the bill explicitly excludes amounts owed
by SCE and PG&E to suppliers.  Committee staff assures us they intend to
address that issue in future amendments.  I will have these comments
available electronically for your information on Monday.

-- In question still at this time is whether AB 18x or AB 1x would be the
vehicle for the product of negotiations between the QFs and the utilities;
or, if another bill all together would carry the water.

-- Asm. Rod Wright has been holding nightly forums with energy stakeholders,
primarily generators, marketers and the utilities, as a general data dump to
keep these groups abreast of what the ECA committee and legislative
leadership is doing and planning on doing.  Edson + Modisette has been
participating in these meetings as has many of the IEP members companies and
their lobbyists.

-- Asm. Wright,s office is continuing to collect siting proposals.  They
have indicated that they intend to keep repower, peakers and new generation
issues separate, in separate bills.  Their immediate interest at this time
is on proposals that benefit repowers.  There is no indication what the
timeframe is on any bill, but proposals should get into his office as soon
as possible.  IEP members that have proposals separate from the IEP package
should also provide IEP a copy.

-- Attached is the most recent tracking report which includes all the
special session bills introduced to date.

UPCOMING EVENTS:

-- The Assembly ECA committee will continue debate on AB 18x on Monday and
Tuesday, hopefully concluding on Wednesday for a vote on the final package.
Time, TBA.

-- The Senate Appropriations Committee will meet and vote on AB 1x on Monday
at 10 am.

--end--

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - 2001 Tracking Report.doc


Was it not January when we were back and forth and back and forth to
London/Helsinki?  And despite the fact that the date sequence from London
looks funny, it would seem that Nigel on the 17th of February is talking
about beginning the process (actually debating the process) of background
checks?
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000 06:28 PM
---------------------------

Steve W Young
02/17/2000 03:51 AM
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Background Checks

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve W Young/LON/ECT on 17/02/2000 09:52
---------------------------

Steve W Young
17/02/2000 09:50
To: Nigel Sellens/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Background Checks

If they are still employed (presuming all but Ilkka are still on the payroll)
then I believe this should be requested.  As a matter of principal it should
have been done for all in the first place and there should be no reason why
it could not be done now.  Admittedly the reasons will now be obvious for the
request, we can simply tell those checked that it was overlooked originally.
Relative to Ilkka, there is no harm in requesting it as well.  Presuming he
won't consent then we can discuss further.

Nigel Sellens
17/02/2000 07:41
To: Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Background Checks

I have made contact with the security folks in Houston and been advised of
what we need to do.  One obvious point is to understand the legal aspects of
such a check.  I have now spoken to a Finnish lawyer who has advised that any
employee background check (to include credit checks and bank checks) must
have the prior written approval of the employee concerned and this would need
to be provided to the source of the information before it is handed over.

I assume we need to re-think whether we want to go down this route given that
this check process will now have a very visible profile in the Helsinki
office.

What are your views?


Ms. Peppers, I am very sorry, but I must once again reschedule the
appointment that you have with Mr. Lay.  He will be out of town the entire
week of September 26.

The first available time to reschedule is October 19, 2000.  Would an
afternoon appointment work for you - about 2:00 p.m.?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Rosalee


Kim,

Sally says that Wes Colwell will be assigning ENA representative.

Patti
x39106


Louise,

Those numbers are impressive without a doubt.  The success has had the
unfortunate consequence of showing the limits of our current internet
technology.  The delays in messages from the stacks to the website have
gotten worse in recent weeks.  This is only anecdotal evidence but as a
trader on the system it has been very frustrating.

Regards,

Pete Keavey


When I tried to verbally confirm this deal, the counterparty has this deal
running for three months, December through February.  Could you check with
the trader and either change it or have him talk to the counterparty about
it.  Let me know.

Thanks!


Tana/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type US
Crude Basis Swap.  Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles for
the new product type from the following:

US WTI Fin Swap

Please respond by 10 a.m. on Wednesday, November 8.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 02:04 PM
---------------------------

Robert B Cass
10/31/2000 05:13 PM
To: Matthew Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Richard Schneider/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi
Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn
C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New EOL Product - Crude Oil Financial

Hi Matt-

SIGMA FACTOR REQUEST:
Commercial has requested the following new Crude Oil Financial product type
on EOL.  The product type is similar to a gas basis link product type except
that the commodity is Crude.   (Platt's Indices will apply for the fixed and
float pricing) :

New Product TypeCommodity:
Product Type:   US Crude Fin Basis Swap
Commodity: Crude Oil
Currency:     USD
Default UOM:   Barrels
Country:   USA

Financial Description (e.g):
A US Crude financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under
which either (A) for the case in which Counterparty submits an offer to buy
from Enron, Counterparty shall pay the Fixed Price and shall receive the
Floating Price, each in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination
Period; or (B) for the case in which Counterparty submits an offer to sell to
Enron, Counterparty shall receive the Fixed Price and shall pay the Floating
Price, each in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.
Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period is the
volume submitted by the Counterparty via the website.  The Payment Date(s)
will be 5 business days after both the Fixed Price and the Floating Price are
determinable. The Floating Price shall be the average of the Index for each
day in the relevant Determination Period.

The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date. The Effective Date is 01 Jan 2001. The Termination Date is
31 Dec 2001.

(Note:  The following 3 indices will be applicable)
(Light Louisiana Sweet)
The Fixed Price for a Determination Period shall be the mean of the daily
first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in the
Crude Price Assessments section of Platt,s Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable Calculation Period, modified by the price
submitted by the Counterparty on the website.  The Index for a day shall be
the mean of the daily quotations for LLS under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in
the Crude Price assessments section of Platt,s Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable Calculation Period.

(West Texas Sour)
The Fixed Price for a Determination Period shall be the mean of the daily
first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in the
Crude Price Assessments section of Platt,s Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable Calculation Period, modified by the price
submitted by the Counterparty on the website.  The Index for a day shall be
the mean of the daily quotations for WTS under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in
the Crude Price assessments section of Platt,s Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable Calculation Period.

(Midland Sweet.)
The Fixed Price for a Determination Period shall be the mean of the daily
first line quotations for WTI/(MONTH) under the heading "U.S. $/Bbl" in the
Crude Price Assessments section of Platt,s Oilgram Price Report for those
issues published for the applicable Calculation Period, modified by the price
submitted by the Counterparty on the website.  The Index for a day shall be
the mean of the daily quotations for WTI Midland under the heading "U.S.
$/Bbl" in the Crude Price assessments section of Platt,s Oilgram Price Report
for those issues published for the applicable Calculation Period.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be Barrels per
month and the quantity shown shall be in Barrels per month.


We hope to get the documents for this deal signed up within the next several
days.  Once these documents are executed, our biggest challenge will be to
accomplish all of the "physical" things
(permitting/approvals/construction,etc.) that will be necessary for us to
perform on this deal.  While we have every expectation that we will be able
to accomplish these things, our Bakersfield gas plant is in a very sensitive
environmental location, and we must acknowledge that there is always the
chance that we will not be able to get all required approvals, etc. from all
applicable authorities.  We have built strong "outs" into our agreements with
Oxy to protect us against this possibility (we won't be liable to them if we
can't perform because we can't get the needed permits/approvals), but we all
need to recognize that there is at least some degree of economic loss (in the
form of sunk costs) that we will suffer if this deal does not go through.

I believe that Enron's financial group has okayed this deal (Joe, please
confirm), and that we have spent about $1.5 million on this project to date.
Also, it is my understanding that we will be spending about $250.000 on this
deal per week as we move forward.  My understanding is that approximately
half of what we have already spent is on supplies/pipe/materials that would
be sellable/reusable if this deal does not ultimately make it for the reasons
stated above. I do not know the percentage of future expenses that would be
"salvageable."

In any case, this deal is a great opportunity for our West Coast segment, and
our mindset is that we WILL be successful in completing all
construction/permitting needed to perform with Oxy.  We want to begin
performing with Oxy as soon as possible, and to do this, we are
building/spending/constructing while, at the same time, nailing down all
needed approvals. Thanks.  SWD


---------------------- Forwarded by TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron on 01/26/2001 10:06 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  TK Lohman                           01/24/2001 01:59 PM

To:	Jan Moore/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pallavi Goradia/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	REVENUE!

Sempra's K#27293 has been amended for April through October of 2001. The amended rate is $0.3050 revised from $0.2850 for this time period.  The contract MDQ is 49,000 mmbtu/day--14,000 mmbtu/day at PG&E Topock and 35,000 mmbtu/day at Socal Needles.  TW has agreed to move their primary delivery of 14,000 mmbtu/day from PG&E Topock to SW Gas for an incremental $0.07.  The weighted average rate for the contract was an incremental $0.02 or a total of $.3050.

Sempra has also negotiated a true Daily Firm contract for the month of February 2001.

Volume:  15,000 mmbtu/day
Path:  5,000 mmbtu/day EOT to Socal Needles
            10,000 mmbtu/day SJ Blanco to Socal Needles

Rate for the 5,000 mmbtu/day coming from EOT:  Socal Gas Daily minus El Paso Permian Gas Daily minus Fuel minus $.50.
On 1/25/01 this would equate to  $6.95 - (.045) - $.34 - .50 = $6.155 * 28 days * 5,000 mmbtu/day = $861,700

Rate for the 10,000 mmbtu/day coming from Blanco :  Socal Gas Daily minus TW Blanco Gas Daily minus Fuel minus $.50.
On 1/25/01 this would equate to $6.95 - (.25) - $.32 - .50 = $6.38 * 28 days * 10,000 mmbtu/day = $1,786,400.

This is a true Daily Firm.  Sempra will be awarded the 15,000 mmbtu/day on a daily basis based on the Socal Window.  If the delivery cannot be made to Socal Needles, the revenue should not be recognized.  I would recommend accounting for this on a day-to-day basis.

Please let me know if you have any questions.


Here is the swap confirmations.

----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 05:04 PM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	03/29/2001 04:45 PM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Confirm

Stacy,

See attached.  We do have an executed ISDA with NUI Energy Brokers, Inc.
Also, there is Draft language in the header and footer that you may want to
take out.

Thanks,
Joe


I don't know the answer to that.  Does someone else?

Teresa

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

	Joan Quick
	12/24/00 04:35 PM

		 To: Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jesus Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: VPP's get syndicated

When the existing VPP's get syndicated into Brazos later this week, then they
will be between Brazos [not Entrada] and Crescendo, and Brazos [not ECT
Merchant...] and St. Mary's, who is the person responsible for making sure
that the ENA contracts group makes the name change [assignment], and that
everything in ENA's internal system - Sitara gets changed accordingly?  And
also to make sure that these deals do not get duplicated?

thanks


Recently, Jeff McMahon, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Enron
Corp., accepted the position of Chief Commercial Officer of Enron Net Works.
Jeff's many accomplishments at Enron Global Finance ("EGF") include over $30
billion of closed financings and an upgrade of Enron's credit rating by
Moody's to Baa1.  We wish Jeff well in his new endeavor.

Ben Glisan, Vice President and head of EGF's Structured Finance business,
will assume Jeff's responsibilities as Vice President and Treasurer of Enron
Corp.  Ben joined Enron in 1996 from Arthur Andersen where he was responsible
for managing structured transactions with Enron.  Prior to Arthur Andersen,
Ben worked at Coopers & Lybrand providing accounting and finance services
principally to financial institutions.  Ben will be a member of the Enron
Corp. Executive Committee.

For additional details regarding EGF's organizational changes, please see the
attached memo.


Peter, your proposed counsel picks are fine by me. Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keohane, Peter
Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 11:26 AM
To:	Derrick Jr., James; Haedicke, Mark; Sanders, Richard
Cc:	Taylor, Mark; Johnston, Greg; Crawford, Sharon
Subject:	Litigation Counsel Approval - Lakeside Packers

We have a counterparty (Lakeside Packers) who refuses to perform to a 5 year fixed for floating power swap which commenced Jan. 01 and is C$2.5MM (US$1.7MM) in the money to us and booked (we would take a hit to earnings by that amount to unwind the deal).  Unfortunately, without the involvement of Legal, the deal was executed without paper, but on the basis that it was subject to our standard ISDA documentation.  The Confirm was sent out on that basis but not executed by the counterparty.  There was some agreement on guarantee support, but as this was less clear to get the underlying deal put in place, with the approval of Credit, we gave up the requirement for the guarantee in our subsequent discussions and demand letter.

We want to pursue the matter by commencing litigation.

Lakeside is traditionally represented by Blakes.

My suggestion would be to use the Duncan McCachen firm, a litigation boutique who we have used in the past (CIBC litigation).  Mike McCachen has a good understanding of the trading business for a litigation lawyer.  Alternatively, I would suggest Clarke Hunter of Macleod Dixon who is currently representing us on the NGX litigation and who also has a good understanding of out trading business.  Mike is a little more aggressive than Clarke, to my preference.

We would like to proceed as soon as possible as our demand letter expired last week, and our calls this morning were not dealt with satisfactorily.

Peter.


Dear Joe,  Congress is out of town, but we've still got plenty of energy news from Washington.  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission meets on Tuesday.  One of the issues on the FERC's agenda is a complaint filed against the California Independent System Operator.  Some companies allege the ISO is giving the California Department of Water Resources preferential market treatment in its new role as California's main power purchaser.  We'll bring you the latest from the FERC on Tuesday.    ENL's Washington bureau will also cover the release of the North American Electric Reliability Council's Winter Assessment on Tuesday.  The new NERC report will be released at 9:30 a.m. ET from the National Press Club in Washington.   Also on Tuesday, ENL's Alison Kosik will bring us more from the Department of Energy's Clean Coal Technology Conference in Washington.  The event focuses on the latest in clean coal innovation and the prospects for coal-fired generation in the U.S.   Houston Correspondent Kim Benestante reports, many companies feel wild price swings could be eliminated with more accurate weather predictions.  On Tuesday, Kim talks with Reliant Energy about steps that can be taken to minimize weather risks.   Ivanhoe Energy Vice President of Investor Relations John MacDonald talks with our Houston bureau about plans his company has for Gas-to-Liquids production.  This type of motor fuel is odorless and emissions-free.  We'll have more from MacDonald on Tuesday.   From the NASDAQ on Tuesday, ESAI Power and Gas Services Director Edward Kraples will join us.  During the 9:00 a.m. ET newscast, he'll talk about the amount of investment needed to keep Northwest power prices from escalating.   Broadcasting Note: Thanksgiving is this Thursday and the ENL staff is preparing the turkey.  The markets are closed Thursday and Friday, so we'll be dark.     Wrap Note: In response to many viewer requests, starting today we're going to add some of the day's commodity settles.  We hope you'll enjoy this new addition to the daily wrap.   Crude:  $17.72  Unleaded: $.5079  Heating Oil: $.5238  Natural Gas: $2.791   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  Real Player: 56K  |  100K  |  300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


I consider the no notice to be part of the market imbalance for this analysis.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Hi Kevin:

I was out of the office on Thursday and Friday.   I have discussed this with
Vince Kaminski and he says the charges are correct.  Jason Sokolov
reports to Tanya Tamarchenko in the Research group and all of their
costs are charged to RAC.

If you need further verification, please contact Vince Kaminski at 3-3848.

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
3-5290

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
07:45 AM ---------------------------

Anita DuPont@ENRON
03/15/2001 05:20 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sokolov EIS Expenses

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita DuPont/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 05:14
PM ---------------------------
From: Kevin Jolly/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/14/2001 01:38 PM
To: Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Sokolov EIS Expenses

Anita, the other day I called you to get Jason Sokolov's cost center.  Some
of his EIS expenses (market data, long distance) for Jan and Feb 2001 were
charged to the Enron Corp. RAC cost center.  In order for our accountants to
reclass the expenses, we need your approval that the expenses can be moved.

If this is okay, just reply back and let me know.

See the attached files for the detail of the expenses to be moved for Jan and
Feb.

Thanks for your help,
Kevin


I've tried to capture in the document Dave sent around on Friday, the
preliminary conclusions/directions we came up with in today's meeting.  If
I've mangled or missed anything, please chime in.  If folks have information
(i.e., bullet points) to discuss at Wednesday's meeting regarding the various
issue areas they're thinking about, please foward along to me by COB tomorrow
and I'll compile for distribution first thing Wednesday morning.

Best,
Jeff


Please set up this call. Rick McCombs in at Mayer Brown in Chicago. Also--get his direct no. and address and add them to my directory. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sanders, Richard B.
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Champion, John; Evans, Mark (London Legal)
Cc: T Paul Johnson (Legal); Simons, Paul; Nissan, Limor; 'hmccombs@mayerbrown.com'; 'cwoods@mayerbrown.com'
Subject: RE: Longview

I spoke to Rick McCombs at Mayer Brown this morning and he informed me that he is in trial all week and unavailable for a call today. We agreed to a 7am central (1pm London and 8am New York) call on Thurs. to go over the answer and any other pending items. He promised a draft answer by  3 pm central on Wed afternoon. Hopefully, Paul will be well by then. I will set up a call-in number for the conference..

 -----Original Message-----
From: Sanders, Richard B.
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:18 AM
To: Champion, John; Evans, Mark (London Legal)
Cc: T Paul Johnson (Legal); Simons, Paul; Nissan, Limor
Subject: RE: Longview

I am trying to set up a conf. call today at 10:30 central to speak to the Chicago attys. Andy is not involved in this case.

-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, John
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 5:36 AM
To: Evans, Mark (London Legal)
Cc: Sanders, Richard B.; Edison, Andrew; T Paul Johnson (Legal); Simons, Paul; Nissan, Limor
Subject: RE: Longview

Mark, fyi
Paul J is away sick but asked me to deal with this.  I have also discussed with Paul S.  Conference call planned for 2pm today with Andy Edison to discuss this (and Kemper).

-----Original Message-----
From: Evans, Mark (London Legal)
Sent: 11 September 2001 09:45
To: T Paul Johnson (Legal); Nissan, Limor; Simons, Paul
Cc: Sanders, Richard B.; Edison, Andrew
Subject: RE: Longview

Let's keep the pressure up by all means but I understand that an extension of this period is not hard to come by.

I assume you're talking about that with Andy, Paul J.
J. Mark Evans
Enron Europe Legal Department
direct tel: 44 207 783 5424
direct fax: 44 207 783 8287
email: mark.evans@enron.com
-----Original Message-----
From: T Paul Johnson (Legal)
Sent: 10 September 2001 11:09
To: 'Woods, Craig A.'; Nissan, Limor; McCombs, Hugh R.; Forrester, J. Paul
Cc: Raver, Carrie Marie ; Gamboa, Armando M.; Hahm, David ; Montz, Alex P.; Stoll, J. Robert ; Durkin, Thomas M.; Simons, Paul; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Sanders, Richard B.; Edison, Andrew
Subject: RE: Longview
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVICE

Thank you for the written advice. Obviously prospects of success assessed at "[no] more than 50%..." (ie. definitely less than 50%) is depressing, given initial expectations. We now need to maximise our bargaining power for acquisition of the smelter through the litigation which McCook have forced on us.

We look forward to receiving the draft Defence and Counterclaim for comments/approval. We will need this fairly urgently, since the 20 day period for service expires next Monday, 17 Sept 2001 (according to my calculations - please confirm). Can you please ensure that they are sent to all the copy parties on the email (now including Houston litigation dept). Thank you.

Paul Johnson
Enron legal dept
-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Craig A. [mailto:cwoods@mayerbrown.com]
Sent: 06 September 2001 16:58
To: Groves, Robert; Heffron, Kevin; T Paul Johnson (Legal); McKey, Christopher; Michaud, Jean; Nissan, Limor
Cc: Raver, Carrie Marie ; Gamboa, Armando M.; Hahm, David ; McCombs, Hugh R.; Montz, Alex P.; Stoll, J. Robert ; Forrester, J. Paul ; Durkin, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Longview

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
All:  Attached is our follow-up memorandum regarding the merits of Enron's claim to enforce the Tolling Agreement against Longview.  Please feel free to contact either Rick or me if you have any questions.

Craig A. Woods
Mayer, Brown & Platt
190 S. LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60603
(312) 701-8536 ph.
(312) 706-8697 fax
cwoods@mayerbrown.com

<<Merits_Memo.doc>>

***********************************************************************
NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it are
intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged
and confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
by e-mail reply and please delete this message from your computer.
Thank you. Mayer, Brown and Platt.


No problem.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           07/05/2000 07:33 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie Chance/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: PERC Negotiations

FYI, Debbie advised me that the Canadian group has asked that she interface
on the turbine acquisition. Please make sure, as best you can, that the
appropriate persons are involved in the negotiations with Peoples and ABB. I
don't have a preference as to who is doing what, just want to make sure we're
all coordinated.

Thanks,

Ben

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           07/05/2000 06:14 PM

To: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: PERC Negotiations

Rusty,

Let's meet at your convenience.  We need to identify some of the tripping
points and critical path items, especially since our goal (I assume) will be
to keep equipment, EPC contracts, land (?), etc off Enron's balance sheet
while things are developing.  Talking through the process should help.

Kay

Rusty Stevens
06/28/2000 10:51 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: PERC Negotiations

Attached is a proposal that was shared with PERC last week.  We are now
awaiting PERC's response.  I am assuming that they will agree to the terms
since their alternative is to lose $ on the units at resale with no
opportunity for recapture.

I wanted to give you a "heads-up" since the timing will be is tight once I
get the green light to proceed with legal docs.  Please let me know what
documents we will need and how you suggest we expedite the process (LOI or
otherwise).

Calumet Project Participation (with ABB's):
ENA has verbally told them we will not participate in Calumet and the LLC
term to get to execution has expired.
Upon release by Laura/Ben - need to send them formal notice under the PDA
that we are withdrawing our notice of interest to participate in Calumet.

Going Forward:
We need to put the general terms in the proposal into a formal document.
Letter of Intent authorizing us to take control of the development/site sales
process at our expense - if they the deal unwinds we get reimbursed for our
direct costs spent to further perfect/sell their sites.
Assess PERC's legal position with ABB (was it fraud or gross negligence that
ABB failed to mention this problem they've known about for 10 years?).
Authorization/indemnification from PERC to negotiate with ABB to grant
contract concessions that will benefit Enron Canada as subsequent owner.
Enron Canada will likely be involved as lead negotiater with ABB - who in
legal will work with ENA/Enron Canada on this ?

Timing:
Enron Canada - To meet their 2001 schedule we need to have legal
authorization to engage ABB by early-July.
"Pitch Book" - In its current form includes Calumet/Torrence we need
authorization from PERC - Bruce is expecting to begin circulation by week of
July 10th.
EPC contractors -  They bid Calumet using ABB, and we want them to re-bid for
LM 6000's.  Need authorization from PERC (July 14th or sooner) with cost
coverage provisions, since the EPC contractors are likely to want to charge
us $50-$100k to re-bid the deal.


I am on vacation during the week of Oct. 9.  Sara

	Brent Hendry@ENRON
	09/13/2000 04:28 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Vacation etc.

I will be coming into the office late tomorrow morning, I will be waiting for
a second phone line to be installed.  I will be working on some weather deals
from home.  I will be available at my home number if anyone needs to reach
me.  My number is 281 866 8797, my cell number is 832 368 3286.

I would like to take the following Wednesdays as vacation days if it does not
cause a conflict in staffing:  September 27, October 11, October 25 and
November 8.   I would also like to take December 27 through 29 as vacation
days.  Please let me know if this will be problem.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001
09:49 AM ---------------------------

"Jon Schnitzer" <jons@amerexenergy.com> on 05/11/2001 09:27:21 AM
To: "Suzann Schnitzer" <sschnitz@jcpenney.com>, "susan schnitzer"
<s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net>, "skushnick" <skushnick@evomarkets.com>,
"Sandra F Brawner" <Sandra.F.Brawner@enron.com>, "Schnitzer, Harry"
<harrys@saaron.com>, <robert.k.rodriguez@db.com>, "Mike Bilotti"
<michael.bilotti@capco.com>, "lance jordan" <lcjo@dynegy.com>,
<JSEGAUL44@aol.com>, "john shaw" <john.shaw@glencore-us.com>, "jeremy davis"
<jjda@dynegy.com>, "gerardo ruiz" <gee_ruiz@hotmail.com>, "david dunnavandt"
<ddunnavant@reliantenergy.com>, "Chris Paul" <cpaul@dwintegrated.com>, "Brian
York" <byork@dwintegrated.com>, "anrew o ertel" <aertel@evomarkets.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: : First Time Golfer

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hollier, Diana" <DHollier@nisource.com>
To: <jons@amerexenergy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:54 AM
Subject: FW: : First Time Golfer

> ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: grehlinger@altra.com [mailto:grehlinger@altra.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:51 AM
> To: Meyers, Tim; RickyA@calpine.com; michaels@amerexenergy.com;
Martin@Hou.MorrisArchitects.com; Hollier, Diana;
Chris.Hellman@axiaenergy.com
> Subject: : First Time Golfer
>
>
>

 - Inexperienced Golfer.jpg


Vince --

Please feel free to also call Jeff Dasovich (415-782-7822) in our San
Fransisco office.  He has been very involved in the California market
discussions and presented before FERC during their field hearings.  He knows
the profs you are meeting with and has some great insights into our positions.

Jeff also attended Berkeley as an undergrad and is now attending their
B-school in the evenings.

Thanks.

Jim Steffes

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 09/20/2000
09:33 AM ---------------------------
From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 09/20/2000 09:21 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Presentation to faculty and students at Berkeley

Maureen -- please send Vince my California testimony and the talking point
presentation for Jeff Skilling at the National Press Club.
Eliz-- keep Vince on the distribution list for the documents we are
generating now to repond to the California situation.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/20/2000 09:18 AM -----

	Vince J Kaminski@ECT
	09/18/2000 01:26 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Presentation to faculty and students at Berkeley

Steve,

I am a lead recruiter at the University of California at Berkeley for
Enron Analyst/Associate program.

I contacted several friends who work at Berkeley and received an invitation
from one of them to make a presentation at the weekly Faculty Seminar
of the Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research.

The students and faculty members from the business school will be also
invited.

Berkeley in general, and Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations
Research in
particular, are important centers of academic research on electricity markets
(S. Oren works very closely with Severin Borenstein).

My presentation will focus on the Analyst/Associate program. I shall  also
have
an opportunity to discuss the power markets in California (I expect many
questions) before many experts who are very  important to shaping
public opinion and regulatory agenda.

Please, let me know who in you group could help me in preparing this
presentation
and in presenting  Enron's point of view in a more effective way.

Vince

FYI. The name of my friend who invited me:

Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
Dept. of Industrial Engineering
and Operations Research
4117 Etcheverry Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1777


I'm having trouble with Ben directing outside counsel.  I'm going to discuss
it (politely), but I just want you to know what's up.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001 03:12
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           01/04/2001 02:57 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: "Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> @ ENRON
cc: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>@ENRON, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>@ENRON, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: Turbine / Transformer Prototype Documents

Please provide me with copies of these documents, and we'll make the changes.
Thanks.

Ben

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/04/2001 01:40:40 PM
To: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>
cc: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>
Subject: RE: Turbine / Transformer Prototype Documents

Ben:

Substantive revisions were made (changing the earnest money concept to a
development fee concept, more complete termination provisions, replacing
confidentiality provisions with reference to a confidentiality agreement,
elimination of provisions addressing mediation) and the prototype documents
were recirculated on 12/15/2000.  However, the 12/15/2000 drafts of the
documents make specific references to NRG Thermal and contain specific dates
that would no longer be relevant.  We would recommend further revision to
address these matters before circulating for another potential transaction.

Carolyn Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
CCAMPBELL@KSLAW.COM <mailto:CCAMPBELL@KSLAW.COM>

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com [mailto:Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 1:19 PM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com; Fred.Mitro@enron.com; Chris.Booth@enron.com
Subject: Re: Turbine / Transformer Prototype Documents

Carolyn:

Are these the most recent form documents, or were there any material
changes made when we were dealing with NRG on the LM6000s? Please let me
know.

Regards,

Ben

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 12/14/2000 04:26:00 PM

To:   "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>
cc:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>,
      "'Jim.Gilbert@enron.com'" <Jim.Gilbert@enron.com>,
      "'Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com'" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>, "Keffer,
      John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>
Subject:  Turbine / Transformer Prototype Documents

 <<2RZ501!.DOC>>  <<2R6LRED.DOC>>  <<2RZ601!.DOC>>  <<2RLSRED.DOC>>
<<2RZ5RED.DOC>>  <<2RZ801!.DOC>>  <<2RSWRED.DOC>>

We have enclosed initial drafts of the following documents:

     1.   Letter Agreement for the Turbine Transaction (clean copy and
blacklined copy marked to reflect revisions from the current draft of the
turbine letter agreement with Coral);

     2.   Letter Agreement for the Transformer Transaction (clean
copy, blacklined copy marked to reflect revisions from the current draft of
the transformer letter agreement with Coral, and blacklined copy marked to
reflect revisions from the turbine letter agreement referenced as item no.
1
above);

     3.   Limited Liability Company Agreement (clean copy and
blacklined copy marked to reflect revisions from the current draft of the
LLC agreement for CA/ED-II).

As mentioned on the telephone, I have retained a number of the
representations and warranties requested by Coral, with modifications where
necessary to eliminate those aspects which were objectionable to Enron.
The
justification for this is that nearly any purchaser would insist on such
representations, and it is often more advantageous to present a draft that
appears to be neutral, rather than allow the counterparty to focus on what
is not there and then have the advantage of drafting precisely what it
wants.  Therefore, we suggest that Enron carefully review the
representations and warranties in order that any objectionable items can be
eliminated before circulation of documents to the counterparty.  Because we
rearranged and reorganized the representations and warranties to make a
more
clear presentation, the blacklined drafts will not be very helpful fur
purposes of reviewing representations and warranties.

Please review the enclosed at your convenience and advise of any comments.
Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-73-7 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures:    129569v1
          129569v1 from 128541v14
          129570v1
          129570v1 from 129088v6
          129570v1 from 129569v1
          129572v1
          129572v1 from 129344v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

(See attached file: 2RZ501!.DOC)
(See attached file: 2R6LRED.DOC)
(See attached file: 2RZ601!.DOC)
(See attached file: 2RLSRED.DOC)
(See attached file: 2RZ5RED.DOC)
(See attached file: 2RZ801!.DOC)
(See attached file: 2RSWRED.DOC)

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Reminder:

Conference Call with ConEd at 1:00 today in Sara's office - EB3801A.


we are playing tenn.  they are going to hammer us.  i am going in.  it should
be on at 530 espn your time.  griese and davis starting sunday?


Aslo where all my traders that I assigned.


Greetings, members of the RTO West Stage 2 Tariff  Integration Group.
?
This e-mail is to remind you that we will meet on  Wednesday, March 21 from
7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. at the RTO West office (5933 NE  Win Sivers Drive,
Suite 201, Portland).
?
This is also to let you know that a draft agenda and other  materials for the
March 21 meeting are posted on the Tariff Integration Group  Webpage on the
RTO West Website, which is at:
?
http://208.55.67.64/Stage2TariffIntGrpMain.htm
?
Thank you very much!
?
- Sarah


To all whom it may concern:

Please change my E-mail address from

vkamins@ect.enron.com

to

vkamins@enron.com

Vincent Kaminski


This employee and his/her manager, Bob Schorr, do not report in to me.  This
approval should be sent to someone else.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 02:02 PM
---------------------------

From:  Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT

Subject: Your approval is requested

	Security Resource Request System
Application Approval
Please review and act upon this request. You have received this eMail because
you are listed as an approver on the original request.
			Instructions
For: 	Ami Thakkar
Request	Original:
Application Name:	EOL - Other (US)
Request Type:	Grant
Role(s):
Comments:	Need Eol Cluster Prod. (static data manager)		Review the request in the
Request section at left.
			For more information regarding who the request is for, do the following:
			Click on the name for PeopleFinder info
			See the Further Information section below
			In the Approval Section, select Approve or Reject, enter comments as
necessary and click [Submit].

	Further Information

Requestor:			Ami Thakkar/NA/Enron
Manager:	Bob Schorr
Request Date:	09/19/2000 10:01:11 AM
RC #:	103240	WO #:
Company #:	087B	Priority:	Normal
General Comments:


Can I please see the resumes.


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001 04:47
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen D McIlvoy                           03/07/2001 09:40 AM

To: Barry.Belcher@PSS.boeing.com
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Leaving Early...

---------------------- Forwarded by Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001
09:42 AM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Rivera@ENRON
03/06/2001 09:14 AM
To: Ragan Bond/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Leaving Early...

>  Three women all worked in the same office with the same female boss.
>Each
>  day, they noticed the boss left work early. One day, the women decided
>  that, when the boss left, they would leave right behind her.
>
>  The brunette was thrilled to be home early. She did a little gardening,
>  spent playtime with her son, and went to bed early.  The redhead was
>  elated to be able to get in a quick workout at the spa before meeting a
>  dinner date.
>
>  The blonde was happy to get home early and surprise her husband, but when
>  she got to her bedroom, she heard a muffled noise from inside.  Slowly
>and
>  quietly, she cracked open the door and was mortified to see her husband
>in
>  bed with her boss! Gently, she closed the door and crept out of her
>house.
>
>  The next day, at their coffee break, the brunette and redhead planned to
>  leave early again, and they asked the blond if she was going to go with
>  them. "No way," the blonde exclaimed. "I almost got caught yesterday!"
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/06/2000 11:35
AM ---------------------------

Diane Fitzgerald <diane.fitzgerald@travelpark.com> on 08/04/2000 04:08:27 PM
To: "'KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM'" <KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM>
cc:

Subject: Please review your following upgraded itinerary. Have a nice tri p!

                                          MANN/C KAY
                                          ATTN SUZANNE ADAMS
                                          713 853-7340
  ENRON CORP                  3AC SUITE 400

  DATE:  AUG 04 2000

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  07AUG HOUSTON        WASHINGTON     1053A   0252P
CO 1460    A          MON   G.BUSH INTERCO R REAGAN NAT
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL B
                            LUNCH                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:59 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500
                            SEAT 03B NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MANN/C KAY(IDS8
                    FIRST CLASS UPGRADE IS CONFIRMED.

HOTEL                 07AUG FOUR SEASONS WASHINGTON
                      09AUG 2800 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW
                             WASHINGTON, DC 20007
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 202-342-0444
                            FAX: 202-944-2076
                            TELEX: 904008
                            CONFIRMATION: 89115111
                            SINGLE KING SIZE BED
                            RATE: COR USD 305.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            CANCELLATION POLICY: REQUIRES CANCEL BY 6PM
                            DAY OF ARRIVAL
                            ENRON CORP RQST NONSMKG
     TO AVOID NO SHOW BILLING. CANCEL 6PM HOTEL TIME DAY OF ARRIVAL

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  09AUG WASHINGTON     HOUSTON        1130A   0133P
CO 1837    A          WED   R REAGAN NAT   G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL B     TERMINAL C
                            LUNCH                         NON STOP

                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:03 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
                            SEAT 03B NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MANN/C KAY(IDS8
                    FIRST CLASS UPGRADE IS CONFIRMED.

MISCELLANEOUS         08OCT HOUSTON
                      SUN   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

MANN/C KAY(IDS8C061MR102049)

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
LIL BAILEY 345-6275
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRONASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS: IN U.S 800 523-6586/INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*******************************************
THIS IS THE PASSENGER RECEIPT FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC TICKET.
PLEASE CHECK-IN WITH PHOTO IDENTIFICATION AND WITH
EITHER (1) THIS RECEIPT OR (2) YOUR CONFIRMATION NUMBER.
.
YOUR ETKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: O 2 G 5 D 5


----- Original Message -----
From: LIZ PRIOR
To: patrice.l.mims@enron.com  ; mark.schrab@enron.com  ; lisa.kinsey@enron.com  ; kirk.lenart@enron.com  ; grant.oh@enron.com
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: AOS WILL DECREASE TO 6% FOR OCTOBER 30th


It looks an awful lot like snow.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: <shusser@enron.com>; <dfranklin@hanovermeasurement.com>;
<Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com>; <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>;
<lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:44 PM

> http://www.rsn.com/pages/include/cams/campic.html?rsn_resort=telluride
>


Please update daily

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mcginnis, Stephanie
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.; Reasoner, Monica
Subject:	Overdue margin

Louise,
There are only two counterparties at this time who have overdue margin:

			Original Margin Call		Margin Due Today
Kinder Morgan		$  3,500,000			$  1,250,000
AEP			$19,250,000			$38,750,000
			---------------			---------------
	Totals		$22,750,000			$40,000,000

Please let us know if you need any additional information.
Stephanie


I have provided below an updated training schedule.  Tammy


The APX called me today.  They are concerned we are sending them confirms on
deals that we are doing with them.  Legally this is incorrect as we are
transacting purusuant to the APX Master, not the Enron Master.  So, please
try to remember to check the box for no confirms when you transact with the
APX.

C


Milberg Weiss is the main plaintiffs' counsel. They are a well known (and
good) securities class action plaintiffs firm. The John O'Quinn of LA---Tom
Girardi-- is the plaintiffs' atty in the somewhat related gas cases. These
are not PI types per se, but more commercial litigation plaintiffs firms.

	Jordan Mintz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/26/2001 01:42 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: California

Richard: What is the makeup of the plaintiffs' bar in all the litigation in
Calif?  Is it attracting PI types?
Jordan


Congratulations to Tom Briggs and the entire Pipeline Safety Improvement Act
working group for passage of this legislation today by the Senate, in a 98-2
cliffhanger.  One troublesome amendment was seriously considered, but a
watered down version was worked out b/t Senators Corzine and Breaux.  In its
stronger version, the amendment would have imposed mandatory five year
inspection standards on the industry.   Our initial understanding of the
language suggests it contains flexibility needed by the industry.  We will
reserve judgment until we see the language. But it appears this is a good
victory for the pipeline safety team.  We still have many hurdles on the
bill, including potential for much mischief in the House.  The Senate bill
contained some troubling provisions, but we wanted it passed today "as is" in
order to avoid larger problems.  This goal was largely achieved.
Congratulations team!

P.S.  The Senate used the opening speeches on the bill to have a rather
dogged discussion of the California energy crisis.  All the usual suspects
were on the floor opining on the issue.


I'm checking.  Melissa loves talking about Houston real estate (one of the
many quirks I love her for).  I'll find out when she can do it.

	Ricardo Charvel
	03/12/2001 01:00 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Houston

Steve,

As you might have expected, Elsa already had a to do list, a budget,
information on schools, etc.  I really did not have to discuss about moving
to Houston.  The conversation was more around when and how.

On Friday I have to be in Houston for an EBS meeting on Mexico.  I am
planning to arrive there on Thursday morning to talk to Rick, to Dan Reck and
to Shawn Cumberland.  I also need to find out about relocation and visas ,
etc.

I am writing you to thank you for your generosity in your advice and for
helping me and encouraging me in making this important decision.  I am also
wirting because I am taking your word on Melissa's  knowledge of the real
estate market inside the loop.  Elsa is coming with me on Thursday morning
and we would like to see if it is possible for us to meet with Melissa on
Thursday, Friday or Saturday for advice and orientation. (Of course you would
be welcome to the real estate working session!!)

Please let me know.

Thanks again,

Ricardo


SB 2188: Sales and use taxes: exemptions: Internet purchases. Author: Baldwin
) introduced 2/23/00
Sponsor: Author
Summary:
This bill would additionally exempt from the Sales and Use Tax any tangible
personal property purchased over the Internet.
This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy, but its operative date
would depend on its effective date.
Position:
I assume that we are all for this. Should we watch the bill?
Attached is a copy of the bill


Mark:

Got your voice mail on this. I wasn't sure if you were suggesting the policy
for trading contracts or all contracts of greater than a year.

My thoughts are as follows:

1) Policy Scope: I think we need to address whether the Policy will extend to
trading as well as origination transactions. As you know, often there is a
very blurry line.

2) Existing Masters: If a master is in place, confirmations will be used for
terms of one month to greater than one year. I don't think it will be
practical for us to approve these confirmations before signature unless there
are material modifications done to the pre-approved confirmation template in
the master, which would require Legal approval in the present state of
affairs.  I assume the Policy would only apply to individually negotiated
contracts outside a Master Agreement.

3) Order of Magnitude: We should consider having a dollar figure (determined
simply by multiplying the notional or contract volume x the contract price or
the Enron financial commitment amount), coupled with the one year or greater
term, that would require the additional OGC/AGC approval in order to make
sure the requirement is imposed only for higher dollar contracts.

I would be happy to discuss this with you further.

Alan


its going to be hard to share a room and not talk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:28 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok, but please don't talk to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:28 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i will have to invite myself

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:27 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you will have to ask her.  i don't know who all she is inviting

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:26 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

am i invited

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:24 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i do it all of the time.  robyn said that when we are up and running again they are going to have something for their counterparties and she wants me to come.  who knows when that will be.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:23 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

thats a long drive by yourself, when are you going to ny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:22 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i am hopefully leaving around 3.  i have to go to my house and get my baby.....my dog

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:21 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i got in around 10, so what time are we leaving

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:20 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

i don't let things go do i?  i'm just playing.  you can come if you want to.  where did you go to lunch?  have you been here all day?


We're back baby.


Do you know my hr rep's name?

Jennifer Burns

10/23/2000 04:09 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

You are such a Shit Head!!!!!


-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 8:56 AM
To: 'a-mheard@houston.rr.com'
Subject: FW: FishFoodForThought
Importance: High

-----Original Message-----
From: Fitzgerald, Genia
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 8:46 AM
To: Heard, Marie; Jones, Tana
Subject: FW: FishFoodForThought
Importance: High

Turn up your sound a bit.


Please provide to me by e-mail by Thursday of this week your suggested
changes to the January 2001 Monthly Report, so that we can issue the February
2001Monthly Report by the end of this week. Thanks for your attention to this
matter.

Regards, Alan


Dear Eva:  Gerald Nemec, Senior Counsel, ENA, suggests the following edits :

Gary,

Per our conversation on July 11, I would like to reiterate that an Enron entity is interested in selling approximately 330 acres of land at the Napoleonville salt dome in Louisiana.  This land is divided into two tracts, one of about 256 acres and the other about 73 acres in size.

Enron recently received $15,000 per acre in a separate land transaction at Napoleonville, and this sets the market price that we expect to receive in the above proposed land sale.

Does Dow have interest in this land?  Is this price within your range?  If so, I would encourage you to draft a proposal from Dow within the next two weeks, if possible.

This email does not constitute an offer, but is solely provided for informational purposes.

Let's discuss this at your earliest convenience.  Thanks again for taking the time to meet with me last Thursday, and I look forward to hearing from you soon!

Sincerely,
Eva Rainer
Upstream Products Group
Enron Americas
713-853-9679

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rainer, Eva
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 4:00 PM
To:	Ogden, Mary
Subject:	Draft email regarding Napoleonville Land Sale

Mary,

Below is a draft of the language for the email to Gary Chapman of Dow Chemical, who wanted me to document our request informally so as to start the bidding process within Dow.  If you have revisions, just forward them to me and I will paste them into a clean email to send to him.  Please let me know what you think:

Gary,

Per our conversation on July 11, I would like to reiterate that Enron is interested in selling approximately 330 acres of land at the Napoleonville salt dome in Louisiana.  This land is divided into two tracts, one of about 256 acres and the other about 73 acres in size.

Enron recently received $15,000 per acre in a separate land transaction at Napoleonville, and this sets the market price that we expect to receive in the above proposed land sale.

Does Dow have interest in this land?  Is this price within your range?  If so, I would encourage you to draft a proposal from Dow within the next two weeks, if possible.

Let's discuss this at your earliest convenience.  Thanks again for taking the time to meet with me last Thursday, and I look forward to hearing from you soon!

Sincerely,
Eva Rainer
Upstream Products Group
Enron Americas
713-853-9679


You might want to attend this meeting if you can.  We did some brainstorming
today on what / how a Commodity Logic payment module should be and came up
with some options that are quite revolutionary.  It entails some risk, but
also has revenue potential as well.  We want to run it by both you and Tom to
see if this is a direction you want to head.

If you're not available, then I can spend time with you to give you the
overview.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
02:09 PM ---------------------------
From: Maria Sandoval on 11/22/2000 01:27 PM
To: Kristin Cantu/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brenda Flores-Cuellar/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Payment Module Mtg. on 11/28

The above mentioned meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, November 28th
from 9 - 10 a.m. in EB 21c1.

If I have access to your calendar, this has already been added.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at ext. 35586.

Thank you.