Michael:
FYI.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/24/2001 04:26 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/24/2001 12:57 PM

		 To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
skean@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron,
Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS; Davis Staff Admit that DWR Costs for
Purchases Is Staggering and Rates Must Increase Dramatically; PG&E says it
will sue over QF payment plan; Mike Kahn Takes Pot Shots in Editorial
Defending Davis/Lynch

Please see the following important stories.  It appears to be quickly
slipping through Davis' fingers.  May be useful to re-group a bit in light of
the following events.  In sum:

Most importantly, in today's Chronicle, it's reported that Davis' staff met
with key Democrats yesterday and lowered the boom.
DWR purchases likely to be about $25 billion and rates may have to go up by
100%.  (See attached story.)
Apparently, one of the big reasons that 8X got held up yesterday is because
Davis' own staff went to D leadership and said, "don't move 8X (a bill that
Davis was said to support) because the $10 billion cap on bonds won't work;
they need much more."
It appears that rate increases will now become part of the mix, whether Davis
likes it or not.
The staff alleged that they were conveying the information before Davis had
been informed of the "bombshell."
Davis was criticized for being at yet another fund-raiser yesterday while the
situation significantly deteroriated in Sacramento.  (See attached story.)
Meanwhile, PG&E has sued--or may be about to sue--the State, saying they
won't pay the QFs according to Davis' plan (which the PUC is supposed to
implement on Tuesday).  (See attached PG&E press release.)
Finally, Mike Kahn has issued an opinion piece in yesterday's Chronicle, in
which he attempts to lump together into one pile Republicans, market
proponents, price gougers and Texans, and defending Davis and Lynch.

******************************************************************************
***********************************************************************
Davis' Measured Plan To Fight the Darkness
Michael Kahn
Friday, March 23, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/23/E
D103778.DTL
COMMENTS on Gov. Gray Davis' energy programs by apologists for former Gov.
Pete Wilson bring to mind Robert Kennedy's admonition that it is better to
light a candle than curse the darkness.
Let's examine the darkness created by Wilson's energy deregulation scheme.
The 1996 law he signed could not have been more wrong headed.
-- Why did it hand energy price control over to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission?
-- Why did it free wholesale prices, while capping the price utilities could
charge customers?
-- Why did the former state Public Utilities Commission force utilities to
sell off their fossil fuel power plants, leaving them vulnerable to predatory
pricing by out-of-state merchant generators?
-- Why did the Wilson-era PUC bar utilities from entering into contracts to
ensure a long-term supply of cheap electricity?
-- Most pointedly, why did California enter into deregulation without enough
available generation to ensure a fair market based on balanced supply and
demand?
These are tough questions. It is not hard to understand why former proponents
of the 1996 deregulation scheme would rather not answer them, preferring to
bemoan the darkness and curse Davis' actions.
The Wilson apologists jeer at plans for the state to purchase the power grid,
though they surely know the value of a well-maintained, fully functioning
electric transmission network. Bottlenecks in the grid impede the sharing of
power between Northern and Southern California. This was a main reason
Northern California experienced rolling blackouts in January while Southern
California had plenty of power.
The state's purchase of the grid will infuse new cash into the utilities,
pulling them back from the brink of bankruptcy, while giving the state a
tangible and valuable asset in exchange.
And ownership of the grid will allow the state to modernize it, removing
bottlenecks and upgrading technology - something the utilities have long
failed at doing.
The apologists ignore the state's strong record on energy conservation and
Davis' actions to enhance these efforts.
California now has the nation's second-best energy conservation record. The
governor has budgeted $404 million in new conservation measures and added an
executive order offering 20 percent rebates to those who reduce their
consumption 20 percent over last year. These measures will reduce commercial
lighting, encourage residential and industrial efficiency and make state and
commercial buildings more energy efficient.
The apologists disregard the fact that the governor has also reversed a trend
that had seen power plant construction in California drop to insignificance
in the '80s and '90s. Since April 1999, the California Energy Commission has
licensed nine major new power plants. Six are under construction. This is
part of a streamlined, fast-track plant licensing process that aims to put an
additional 20,000 megawatts on line by the summer of 2004, a nearly 50
percent increase in generation.
And the apologists refuse to recognize that California is building the right
sort of power plants - efficient, clean and environmentally friendly, with a
strong bent toward renewable power sources.
In fact, while some would go Texas' route and build plants that meet only the
bare minimum of environmental requirements, California is continuing the
effort that has made it the nation's leader in the use of clean, renewable
power sources.
Instead, the apologists engage in name calling, such as the charge leveled by
former Wilson communications director Dan Schnur on this page that Loretta
Lynch, the Davis appointee as PUC chair, is inexperienced and has failed to
deal effectively with the energy emergency.
Forget for a moment that of the 22 people who have served as PUC
commissioners since 1980, only six had any energy expertise before their
appointments.
Forget for a moment that one of the principal architects of deregulation was
Daniel Fessler, the UC Davis contract law professor with no special expertise
in energy issues whom Gov. Wilson appointed as PUC president.
Just consider this: It was the PUC under Lynch that freed the utilities to
buy electricity on cheaper, forward contracts outside the Power Exchange.
This corrected a huge Wilson-era PUC blunder that put utilities in an energy
price straitjacket. The Lynch-led PUC also prohibited utilities from selling
additional power plants, and it began the successful effort to make
California's ISO (the Independent System Operator that runs the state's power
grid) independent of the industry-connected officials who controlled it.
Meanwhile, what sort of grand solutions have the apologists presented? Drill
for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, build nuclear
plants on closed military bases and encourage the construction of dirty
Texas- style power plants in California.
Drilling in the Arctic will not produce a watt of new power for California.
Californians have long said they do not want the risks presented by new
nuclear plants.
And lax Texas pollution rules prompted the Dallas Morning News to charge in a
Dec. 17 editorial that Texans are choking on the exhaust from power plants.
Most disingenuously, the apologists would "let the market work," claiming
that unfettered market forces will soon bring fair and balanced prices. But
the market doesn't work now, as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has
repeatedly admitted, most recently with its finding that generators
overcharged the state in January.
Unfortunately, for the most part the same commission had refused to clamp
down on sky-high prices charged by generating companies. Look at New York's
deregulated market, where there are no caps on retail electric prices. Market
forces have done consumers there little good. New Yorkers pay the highest
prices for electricity in the country. And the New York Times has reported
that rates paid by consumers have increased a whopping 40 percent just since
1999.
Those who would allow the market to work (let the darkness reign) know well
that if the market "works" to produce New York-style rate increases in
California, the consequences to the public would be dire.
Compare this to Gov. Davis' well-structured plan for effective energy
conservation and stabilization of the state's electricity market and his
expedited program to bring clean, efficient new power plants on line quickly.
Robert Kennedy would understand Gov. Davis' approach and his critics'
perspective.
Michael Kahn is a member of the state Independent System Operator's board of
governors.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 25

Bombshell Warning on Power Cost
Spending may double and rates skyrocket, governor's office tells Legislature
Greg Lucas, Lynda Gledhill, Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday, March 24, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/24/M
N176940.DTL
Top Davis administration officials told lawmakers yesterday that the state
may have to spend twice as much as expected on electricity purchases over the
next two years - requiring rate increases of as much as 100 percent.
The stunning admission by the Davis administration contradicts his repeated
promises that his plan to ease California's energy woes could be done without
a rate increase.
California will probably need to issue $23 billion in bonds for electricity
buys, more than double the amount Davis said would be needed by the state to
keep electricity flowing until California's cash-poor utilities can get back
on their feet.
Administration officials told lawmakers to stop action on a bill that would
have capped the state's energy purchases at $10 billion.
But a Davis spokesman said the numbers were far from firm.
"There are a lot of scenarios being run . . . and until we complete the
negotiations, this can be added up any way you want," said Steve Maviglio,
press secretary to Davis.
"Those numbers are not based on any reality right now," he said. "There are
too many things up in the air."
Assembly Democrats told a different story.
They said Tim Gage, director of Davis' Department of Finance, Cabinet
Secretary Susan Kennedy and John Stevens, Davis' top energy aide, met with
Assembly Democratic leaders and dropped the bombshell.
And they did so just as those same leaders were trying to convince fellow
lawmakers how important the bill was to the Davis administration.
They also said that Davis, who was in the Palm Springs area for most of the
day and briefly attended a fund-raiser at a golf club, was unaware of the
figures.
PURCHASES IN BILLIONS
The three top aides said that electricity purchases for this year by the
state would be $16 billion, not the $10 billion initially predicted. An
additional $7 billion in state power purchases would be needed next year,
they said.
The state has been buying power at a clip of $45 million a day since Jan. 17
because the troubled utilities could no longer afford to make the purchases.
From the start of the energy crisis, the state has planned to repay its power
purchases through bond sales. The bonds would be paid off by a portion of the
amount ratepayers are charged on their monthly bills.
Davis has so far insisted that enough money could be found to cover the $10
billion without raising rates.
But his aides said if the size of the bonds ballooned to $23 billion, a hefty
rate increase would be necessary.
INCREASE UPON INCREASE
The Public Utilities Commission is already planning to make permanent a
temporary 9 percent increase. An additional automatic 10 percent is scheduled
for no later than March 2002.
But the aides said, on top of that, an additional 60 percent to 80 percent
increase would be required to cover the debt service.
"For some time, I have believed a fundamental part of solving this problem is
admitting there needs to be a rate increase, and the numbers that have been
shared today make that inevitable, and we should start dealing with the
reality as soon as possible," said Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek
(Santa Cruz County).
One consumer advocate said the revelation means the utilities are closer to
bankruptcy because the state and ratepayers won't have the cash to bail them
out.
And it could mean political trouble for Davis.
"Unless the governor issues an ultimatum to lower the prices, everybody's
bill will double, and he will not be able to run for re-election in 2002,"
said Harvey Rosenfield, head of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights.
PG&E THREATENS SUIT
The news came as Pacific Gas and Electric Co. threatened to take the state to
court over Davis' plan to force the company to pay back certain creditors.
Davis' proposal would require the utilities to pay alternative power
generators for all the power that they supply, something PG&E said it cannot
afford to do. Several of the generators shut down earlier this week as
rolling blackouts spread across the state.
The bill stalled yesterday in the Assembly as Republicans objected. Lawmakers
will resume debate Monday.
Earlier in the week, Davis announced that action would be taken by the
Legislature and the Public Utilities Commission that would guarantee payment
to the alternative energy providers. He also said the state -- which has
spent $3.7 billion to purchase power -- should be paid back first.
Without that promise, several of the small biomass, solar and wind producing
plants -- called qualified facilities -- said they would have taken Southern
California Edison Co. into bankruptcy court. The alternative generators
provide enough electricity to power roughly 6 million homes.
PG&E said it cannot afford to pay the alternative producers and reimburse the
state for the billions it has spent purchasing power.
"These actions approach the problem in a piecemeal and uncoordinated fashion
and would force us to pay out far more than we collect in rates, further
exacerbating an already precarious financial situation," Gordon Smith, PG&E's
president and chief executive officer, said in a statement.
DIFFERING VIEWS ON COSTS
According to PG&E's numbers, the company collects $400 million a month in
rates. It says the average price to pay all the generation sources exceeds
$1. 4 billion a month.
But consumer advocate Nettie Hoge said the utilities are exaggerating their
own costs in order to try to keep as much money as possible.
"It's just absurd," said Hoge, the head of The Utility Reform Network. "They
have a temper tantrum every time something doesn't go their way."
The bill PG&E objected to is necessary to allow the PUC to order utilities to
pay small power generators who agree to sign lower-priced contracts to
provide energy.
The proposal offers generators a choice of agreeing to a five-year contract
at $79 per megawatt or a 10-year deal at $69 per megawatt, Davis said. The
going rate now is about $150 a megawatt. The PUC wants to act as early as
Tuesday to bring some financial relief to the generators, who have been paid
pennies on the dollar.
Assembly Republicans objected to the bill in part because it would allow the
PUC to change the formula for setting the price paid alternative producers so
that it no longer considered the price of natural gas.
Co-generators -- some of the largest of which are operated by oil refineries
-- say without the price of natural gas as a consideration, it would cost
them more to produce energy than what they would be paid for it.
E-mail Lynda Gledhill at lgledhill@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1

Davis at Fund-Raiser as His Bill Languishes
Critics say he should have been at Capitol
Greg Lucas, Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday, March 24, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/24/M
N171337.DTL
While the Assembly struggled -- and failed -- to pass a bill aimed at keeping
hundreds of small energy generators from bankruptcy, Gov. Gray Davis attended
a $10,000-a-head golf fund-raiser yesterday in Palm Desert.
Organized by Duane Dauner, president of the California Healthcare
Association, the event was held at Bighorn Golf Club, a luxurious private
country club of which Dauner is a member.
Davis' top political adviser said the governor didn't play golf, just stopped
by a luncheon before the round began so he could return to Sacramento.
But during Davis' absence, a bill he backed -- critical to bailing out small
power generators -- languished in the Assembly.
On Thursday, lawmakers canceled next week's long-planned annual trip to
Washington, D.C., to focus on energy issues.
"There is not a lot of electricity to be found on the golf course," said
Harvey Rosenfield of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a chief
critic of Davis and the state's utilities. "He ought to be in Sacramento to
try and solve the crisis and not prospecting for contributions in the grass
in Palm Springs."
The Democratic governor has been frequently criticized for the time he spends
raising money for his campaign fund, money that comes from well-heeled
interests with dozens of issues pending before his administration.
Since becoming governor, Davis amassed $25 million by the end of 2000 --
averaging more than $1 million a month in contributions, often from fund-
raisers directed at specific industries.
Garry South, Davis' political adviser, said Davis was in Palm Springs to
dedicate a University of California building and "dropped by a lunch"
preceding the golf.
South said the fund-raiser "was a diverse group of people that paid varying
amounts of money."
Lawmakers canceled their yearly visit to federal officials on issues
important to the Golden State because they didn't want to give the impression
that "there was somewhere else more important than California," said state
Sen.
Don Perata, D-Oakland.
Raising money at a tony golf resort during the crisis simply looks bad,
Perata said.
"We have to be really careful because the public's patience and their
confidence in what we're asking them to do depends on how they see us
reacting to the problem," he said. "This will be negatively interpreted."
Other lawmakers said the governor's top-level staff was working on the
problem but acknowledged the golfing fund-raiser looked bad.
"It's not the best symbolic message, but I feel we have to give him the
benefit of the doubt," said Assemblywoman Carole Migden, D-San Francisco.
Davis did appear briefly yesterday on nationally broadcast CNBC to talk about
the energy crisis and blast power generators for allegedly overcharging the
state. He appeared live from Palm Springs.
The California Healthcare Association represents nearly 500 hospitals and
boasts on its Web site that it "influences public policy development through
both legislative and regulatory advocacy efforts."
Last month, the group introduced a legislative package to expand nursing
education and streamline college requirements for nurses.
One of the bills calls for spending $120 million a year on nursing classes.
The group also is lobbying the new Department of Managed Health Care, which
is staffed by Davis appointees, to speed up payment of $1 billion in late
bills owed to hospitals.
Davis signed a bill last year that gave the HMO czar the power to sanction
health care plans for failing to pay Dauner's clients, the hospitals, on
time.
In his first six months in office, Davis attended a fund-raising dinner at
Dauner's house that brought in an estimated $100,000. It was part of a spree
that netted the governor a record-breaking $6.1 million in half a year.
At the time, Dauner told the Los Angeles Times: "We don't talk policy at
those kinds of things, or legislation. This was really more of a social
event. He talked about his goals and probably spent more time discussing
education than anything else."
Dauner could not be reached for comment yesterday.
E-mail the reporters at glucas@sfchronicle.com and bsalladay@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 13

	FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 23, 2001
CONTACT: PG&E News Department (415) 973-5930

PG&E Responds to Energy Proposals in Sacramento
	San Francisco -- Pacific Gas and Electric Company today announced that it
will be forced to challenge actions now being contemplated by the State of
California to impose new demands on its frozen rate structure. The proposed
actions will destabilize its current situation with creditors and put the
entire possibility of reaching a balanced solution to California's energy
crisis at risk.
	This week, the State has made clear its intention to use Pacific Gas and
Electric Company's existing rate structure to begin fully paying Qualifying
Facilities (QFs) in advance, for future power purchases, starting April 1,
and to reimburse the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in advance of any
other generating source, including utility-retained generation, bilateral
contracts, QFs or the Independent System Operator (ISO).
	"These actions approach the problem in a piecemeal and uncoordinated fashion
and would force us to pay out far more than we collect in rates, further
exacerbating an already precarious financial situation," said Gordon R.
Smith, president and chief executive officer of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company. "The numbers just don't work."
	Currently, under frozen rates, Pacific Gas and Electric Company has been
collecting approximately $400 million per month for the purchase of electric
power. This revenue has been used in payments to power suppliers, including
power purchases from irrigation districts and bilaterals, to cover costs of
operating our retained generation, and is insufficient to cover payments to
the ISO and QFs. The average combined energy bill from all of these sources
exceeds $1.4 billion a month, and may go even higher in the coming months.
Moreover, the utility's financial condition has been further jeopardized by
the failure of the DWR to acknowledge responsibility for the full "net open
position," i.e. the power that must be purchased on the spot market. This
dispute over the net open position is threatening to accrue additional
liabilities for Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
	"We continue to work with State officials to develop a constructive,
comprehensive solution that assures that California has a reliable and fairly
priced supply of power. Nevertheless, we have a duty to our suppliers,
lenders and shareholders to protect the assets of the utility, and we must
challenge any action by the State to force us to pay out more than is
collected in rates," Mr. Smith concluded.
	?


---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
03:25 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           04/19/2000 02:44 PM

To: Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ray Hamman/HOU/EES@EES, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Tate/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: ANR Wins on Transco Interconnect Complaint!

Well, they will probably file a court appeal, but it doesn't look good.

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
 published : April 19, 2000

               ANR Gets Green Light for Transco Interconnect

      ANR Pipeline last week won a two-year battle at FERC to build a direct
interconnect to Transcontinental
      Gas Pipe Line's mainline facilities at Evangeline Parish, LA --- near
the site of an active natural gas sales
      market.

      On rehearing, the Commission upheld a July 1998 order granting a
complaint in which ANR accused
      Transco of discriminating against it by denying a request to construct
minor interconnection facilities that
      would provide its shippers with direct access to gas sales markets on
Transco's system at Evangeline.

      Specifically, the Coastal Corp. pipeline has fought to obtain a direct
connection to Station 50, which is one
      of several compressor stations on Transco's mainline serving as pooling
points. There, producers and
      marketers sell gas to LDCs and other buyers who hold firm capacity on
Transco for shipment to
      downstream markets. The gas sale market at Station 50 is said to be a
"premium one."

      In order to get their gas to Station 50 now, ANR shippers must deliver
gas via ANR's existing
      interconnection on Transco's Central Louisiana Lateral at Eunice, LA,
and then purchase interruptible
      transportation (IT) service on Transco for a distance of about 7.4
miles. So, in effect, ANR shippers
      currently must pay "stacked rates" for service on ANR's existing
interconnect and for service on Transco's
      IT feeder to reach Station 50.

      But the Commission last week found that ANR's request for a direct
interconnection at Evangeline was
      reasonable under three different analyses. "First, the evidence shows
that Transco has provided no
      reasonable justification for denying ANR's request, given Transco's
history of granting such requests made
      by similarly situated parties," the order said [CP98-74]. Six pipelines
other than ANR currently have direct
      interconnections on Transco's mainline in the Gulf region that were
established prior to Transco's
      restructuring under Order 636, and none of the shippers pay an IT rate
in order to get gas to Transco's
      mainline markets, according to the order.

      Secondly, evidence suggests the denial of an interconnection for ANR
has led to "specific competitive harm
      to the operations of sales markets on Transco's mainline," the
Commission said. That's because buyers at
      Station 50 have been barred access to the competitively priced gas
supplies that ANR's shippers seek to
      offer, FERC noted. Lastly, it said the establishment of the Evangeline
interconnect for ANR was required
      under the new five-step interconnection policy for gas pipelines, which
FERC unveiled last week.

      In upholding the July 1998 decision, the Commission overturned an
administrative law judge's (ALJ) initial
      findings that competition hadn't been adversely harmed at Station 50,
and that FERC's prior approval of the
      IT feeder system provided "appropriate support" for Transco to deny ANR
the Evangeline interconnect.

      "We are persuaded by the record in this case that ANR cannot offer a
pipeline transportation service
      reasonably competitive with those provided by Transco and other
interstate pipelines, without the
      Evangeline interconnect, a minor facility consisting of valve access to
Transco's mainline," the order
      concluded.

      The Commission also rejected Transco's claim that it partly denied
ANR's request for the Evangeline
      interconnect because it would have led to a revenue loss on its IT
Feeder system. As the FERC staff noted,
      "six other interstate pipelines currently use mainline interconnects
[on Transco].....but no evidence indicates
      the extent of even arguably identifiable business loss from these
pipeline competitors," the order noted. If
      anything, "Transco has accorded itself an anti-competitive
preference.....to assure that its own IT service is
      used in lieu of the potential alternative proposed by ANR."


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
09/27/99 01:53 PM ---------------------------

"Richard H. Bernero" <richard.bernero@rhinere.com> on 09/22/99 06:35:01 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd:Phoenix AZ//Rhine Re(Bermuda)confirm 00003.01.01]

2nd try

Rgds

X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <37E938EA.D7121E01@rhinere.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 16:15:39 -0400
From: "Richard H. Bernero" <richard.bernero@rhinere.com>
Organization: Rhine Re Financial Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark.Taylor1@enron.com
CC: Shari.Stack@enron.com, Julie Perron <j.perron@rhinere.bm>
Subject: [Fwd:Phoenix AZ//Rhine Re(Bermuda)confirm 00003.01.01
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="------------045A27362C8B147FA5DE4466"

Mark,

I spoke with Lynda Clemmons today at the NY roadshow, and understand
that in Shari Stack's absence that you are the best one to follow up in
ref: draft confirmation sent to Shari a few weeks ago.

See attached final draft, in case you do not have it readily available.

I will be out of the office Friday 9/24, but will otherwise be available
to discuss.  PLease review the attached, and if it makes sense, perhaps
we can schedule a call to discuss and wrap things up.

Rgds

Richard H. Bernero
VP & Treasurer
Rhine Re Financial Ltd.
(p) 212-454-1893
(f) 212-454-5916
email: richard.bernero@rhinere.com

X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <37D594A3.FA2F5D0@rhinere.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 18:41:39 -0400
From: "Richard H. Bernero" <richard.bernero@rhinere.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sstack@ect.enron.com
CC: George Judd <george.p.judd@db.com>
Subject: Final comments - draft confirmation for the Phoenix deal
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------4B4F4BBA192D7D583B306096"

See attached for your review, which has been approved/reviewed by George
Judd as well.  Other than meetings tomorrow (Wed)  morning, I will be
reachable so we can wrap this matter up.  Perhaps we can touch based in
the p.m., so we can discuss the nature of the changes from our end.  Let
me know what works for you.

Rgds

 - Cn030101.doc


Mohammed

What's going on? I hope school is going well. I am sure you have heard but things are getting back to normal around here. I think working for UBS is going to be really good. Seems like the cultures are going to mix really well. I am thinking about buying a porsche. I really like the 993's but I don't really like the 996's. Looking around for a nice low km 1994-97 C4. Anyway don't work too hard and keep in touch.

Chris


Please forward to whomever else needs it.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/21/2001 04:47 PM -----

	Ann.Cohn@sce.com
	06/21/2001 04:45 PM

		 To: kmccrea@sablaw.com, mkahl@ka-pow.com, jdasovic@enron.com,
wbooth@booth-law.com, drothrock@camfg.com, smutny@iepa.com,
brbarkovich@earthlink.net, dominic.dimare@calchamber.com, isenberg@hmot.com,
dhunter@s-k-w.com, jstewart@cmta.net, mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com,
lga@mother.com, djsmith@s-k-w.com, debinorton@aol.com, cra@calretailers.com,
jredding@aol.com, derek.naten@roche.com, vjw@cleanpower.org,
mflorio@D058661.sce.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: URG Testimony

 Attached is the testimony on the revenue requirement for SCE owned
generation and contracts (including QFs) that was filed yesterday in
response to the ACR.  There was also an appendix B, which contains the
advice letter filings referred to in the testimony.  These advice letters
(1521-E, 1528-E-A, 1528-E-B and 1534-E-A) are available on the SCE website
(www.sce.com), and then clicking on Regulatory Info Center.

(See attached file: 6-20-01-sce-Letter re Testimony.doc)(See attached file:
6-20-01-sce-13.doc)(See attached file: appendix A.doc)

 - 6-20-01-sce-Letter re Testimony.doc
 - 6-20-01-sce-13.doc
 - appendix A.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 03:51 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
07/13/2000 11:19 AM
To:	Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Industrial and IPP Customer Coverage List

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 11:14 AM ---------------------------

Edward D Gottlob
07/12/2000 01:40 PM
To:	Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Industrial and IPP Customer Coverage List

---------------------- Forwarded by Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000 01:40 PM ---------------------------
From:	Greg Brazaitis on 07/12/2000 01:36 PM
To:	Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Industrial and IPP Customer Coverage List

Hope this helps.
Greg B.


lumber


We all attended (parts of) a day long event which I believe Vince is hosting
on Wharton and a project they are doing for us, I personally would like to
see the results of that before doing more with Wharton as overall Vince and
Jeff Shankman have Wharton pretty well covered.

Louise

Christie Patrick
05/21/2001 07:01 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy
Zipper/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/Enron@EnronXGate, Vince J Kaminski/Enron@EnronXGate,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Wharton

Guys--

First of all, Louise, I understand we have a baby??  CONGRATULATIONS!!
(details please, at your earliest chance)

Regarding the Wharton e-Business Initiative (see below for one of the many
eMails I've received concerning Enron's participation--link to the referenced
web site for specific agenda; also, I've received several voice messages from
leaders of the effort).  The information below discusses one of the  forums
(coming up 5/31-6/1) that comprise an on-going e-business initiative in which
Enron has invested with Wharton.

 The participants from Wharton include senior level professors; while there
may be some student involvement, the intentional focus is high level
discussion and research endeavors at the professorial level.
Other participants in WeBI are Corporate representatives.  The idea is for
the professors to offer their latest research issues, promote discussions
among the corporate participants to talk through the professors research and
other research in the literature, as well as for the professors to listen for
new areas for which commercial eBusinesses are seeking new research.

Again,  this is intentionally designed as a High Level Professor
participation on the Wharton side, and high level e-Business Corporate
executives on the other side. This is intentionally designed to create a
high-level 'e-think-tank' environment for senior level professors and
corporate executives.

O.K.....have I labored enough to describe what WeBI is all about??

As opposed to the several other efforts Enron University Affairs has to
DIRECTLY increase Enron's favorability and familiarity on campus at levels
above recruiting, but that ultimately trickle down to recruiting, this is
intentionally a research/discussion effort. Clearly, the Enron Brand equity
in dealing with professors is that the professors ultimately incorporate work
from information from the participatory forums into their class teachings,
references, course work, etc.

A few weeks ago, Louise and I breifly chatted about Enron's involvement in
this effort.  Clearly, there is a HUGE interest by the Wharton professors and
other corporate participants involved to have Enron attend and
participate---they quite respectfully call me and eMail me very
frequently.......All of this is very interesting to me and I have shepherded
our minimal involvement-in-fact........ yet the question remains:  is there
someone at Enron, directly involved in Enron's eBusiness initiatives,
interested in jumping into this effort and participating?  Do those of you
involved in these businesses think it worth your time and expense, or the
time and expense of one of your senior (at least Director level) people to
participate?  Would it be viewed, at least at this time,  simply as an "Enron
brain drain" (I've received this realistic and possibly quite legitimate
concern from more than one business person at Enron).

The bottom line is, I'd like to be able to respond intelligently and honestly
to those at Wharton committed to this effort.  I feel more than comfortable
telling Wharton that, at this time, Enron is satisfied to participate in the
WeBI effort largely at the
financial level it has already invested--with the option to participate at
other levels in the future, at Enron's discretion.

ALL comments solicited----

Many thanks!!

--Christie.

---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001
04:02 PM ---------------------------

HartleyR <HartleyR@wharton.upenn.edu> on 05/21/2001 03:03:44 PM
To: "'Christie_Patrick@enron.com'" <Christie_Patrick@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ICG/Wharton Forum meeting May 31-June 1

Christie,

Lee Goldring, our new Forum director mentioned that he placed a call to you
to introduce himself and follow up on Enron's representation at the next
meeting.  I'm emailing this information to you to alert you to the situation
since I do not think you would want Enron to go unrepresented at the next
meeting. To date, no one from Enron has registered for the Forum sponsored
Online Conversion Workshop,  the Forum meeting on 5/31 or the Members Only
meeting on 6/1.  Please note that the "From Browsers to Buyers: Online
Conversion Workshop" on May 30th is purely optional in case some folks from
Enron are interested in attending.  Since the Forum is co-sponsoring the
Workshop -- WeBI affiliated registrants will not be charged the $495
registration fee as an added benefit for their sponsorship.

Here are all the relevent links to the Forum agenda and registration sites
for your convenience:

Forum Agenda:  http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu/meetingNotes/m_n_5_01.asp
Forum Registration site: http://ecom.wharton.upenn.edu/conferencereg/Reg.asp

From Browsers to Buyers: Online Conversion Workshop:
http://aresty-direct.wharton.upenn.edu/execed/conversion/index.html

Please let me know if there's anything I can help you with.

Best regards,

Robin

Robin Hartley
Associate Director
Wharton Electronic Business Initiative

University of Pennsylvania
Vance Hall - Room 415
3733 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA  19104
tel (215) 898-4158/fax (215) 898-1905
hartleyr@wharton.upenn.edu
http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu


It seems to me we are in the middle of no man's land with respect to the
following:  Opec production speculation, Mid east crisis and renewed
tensions, US elections and what looks like a slowing economy  (?),  and no
real weather anywhere in the world.  I think it would be most prudent to play
the markets from a very flat price position and try to day trade more
aggressively.  I have no intentions of outguessing Mr. Greenspan, the US.
electorate, the Opec ministers and their new important roles, The Israeli and
Palestinian leaders, and somewhat importantly, Mother Nature.  Given that,
and that we cannot afford to lose any more money, and that Var seems to be a
problem, let's be as flat as possible. I'm ok with spread risk  (not front to
backs, but commodity spreads).

The morning meetings are not inspiring, and I don't have a real feel for
everyone's passion with respect to the markets.  As such, I'd like to ask
John N. to run the morning meetings on Mon. and Wed.

Thanks.   Jeff


Again, is this the Hawaii?  Let me know if all this is that deal, and or you
need help.   Mary
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 08:17 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	08/29/2000 08:13 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron/McGarret C Transaction

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/29/00 08:10 AM -----

	"CHRIS KRECEK" <KRECC@andrews-kurth.com>
	08/28/00 12:53 PM

		 To: <alan.quaintance@enron.com>, <brenda.l.funk@enron.com>,
<Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>, <charles.delacey@enron.com>,
<Clement.abrams@enron.com>, <David.roland@enron.com>,
<Gina.Karathanos@enron.com>, <Joel.ephross@enron.com>,
<tina.livingston@enron.com>, <Trevor.Randolph@enron.com>,
<trushar.patel@enron.com>, <mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com>,
<tellwood@mayerbrown.com>, <eawilburn@prickett.com>, <Tamullen@prickett.com>,
<kenton@rlf.com>, <mark.wolf@us.cibc.com>, <mercedes.arango@us.cibc.com>,
<schottla@us.cibc.com>, <aroberts@wilmingtontrust.com>
		 cc: "David Barbour" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "MURIEL McFARLING"
<MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com>, "Michael Thimmig" <THIMM@andrews-kurth.com>
		 Subject: Enron/McGarret C Transaction

Attached in WordPerfect format are each of the following documents marked
against the version previously circulated:

Drawdown Request (254322);
Put Option Agreement (254334);
Warrant Assignment (254351);
Amended and Restated LLC Agreement for McGarret III (254352);
Receipt of Asset LLC (254362);
Independent Auctioneer Letter Agreement (254369);
Direction Letter (254376);
Sale and Auction Agreement (254372); and
General Opinion of A&K (254385).

If you have any questions or comments, please call Muriel McFarling at (214)
659-4461.  Thank you.

Chris Krecek, Secretary/Legal Assistant
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: (214) 659-4481
Fax: (214) 659-4401
Email: ckrecek@andrews-kurth.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information in this e-mail (including any
attachments) is confidential, legally privileged and intended only for the
use of each recipient named above.  If you are not an intended recipient, you
must not read, use or disseminate this information.  If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this e-mail from your computer.
VIRUS WARNING:  Although this e-mail (including any attachments) is not
intended to contain any virus or defect that may affect your computer, you
are responsible for ensuring that no virus or defect exists.  The sender
disclaims any responsibility for any loss or damages arising from any virus
or defect associated with this e-mail.

 - 254385.wpd
 - 254334.wpd
 - 254351.wpd
 - 254352.wpd
 - 254362.wpd
 - 254369.wpd
 - 254372.wpd
 - 254376.wpd
 - 254322.wpd


Per Barbara's request, here's a summary of much of what I'm working on:

Co Op City asset management arrangement:  In this deal, Enron would build a
small power generation facility for a housing co op in the Bronx, Co Op
City.  We would arrange for O & M services, supply the fuel (primarily gas),
market their excess power, and, for the first 4 years, take 1/2 the offtake.
We are currently working to structure the transaction to keep if off the
balance sheet and maximize the mark.  We are working on  a term sheet, and I
will be in NYC later this week to continue negotations with the customer.
Mark Bernstein is the originator, Debbie Chance is the developer, and NEPCO
Houston is  involved.  I discussed outside counsel with Jeff, and I would
like to use John Klauberg at LeBeouf.

Sell of two development projects in Illinois.  Two of the sites we have
developed (sans equipment) are up for sale, and Fred Mitro has contacted me
about supporting the transaction.  Lisa Mellencamp had previously contacted
Bracewell about working on it, but I'm a little concerned about the amount of
experience of the person they have designated.  I've asked Clark Thompson for
some information on his background.

SW 501d - our claim against SWestinghouse, and possible sale of the
equipment.  We have issues with the vendor concerning the late delivery of
this equipment.  We are also trying to sell the equipment (a
turbine/generator set) to Calpine.

Fuel Cells - last year Enron made a $5million investment in Fuel Cells, a
company which is developing an almost green form of power generation.  We
received contingent warrants which we can cash in if we arrange for 55 mw.
We are working with an instrumentality of the state of Connecticut about them
buying 26 megawatts. We are working on the purchase agreement with FC, and
the project development agreement with the State.  It is quiet right now, as
funding is figured out.

There's TurboPark maintenance stuff which pops up weekly.

GE - Sheila and I have a weekly phone conference with GE to work on a
standard contract for buying turbines.  I've heard a rumor that we will be
buying some more, although neither Sheila nor I have been contacted yet.

I think this is a fair summary of the big ticket items.

Kay


Correct Numbers:

Teco Tap       31.876 / HPL Gas Daily ;  44.374 / HPL IFERC

                    20.000 / Enron @ Teco Tap

LS HPL LSK IC            20.000 / Enron

Previous Numbers:

Teco Tap       76.250 / HPL IFERC ; 20.000 / Enron

LS HPL LSK IC       20.000 / Enron


Daren - Can you set up new deals for meter 6757 and 5192?

 Meter 6757 Crow O'Connor -  Counterparty Duke Energy & Trading

  Month  Contract Deal #
  June 99  ENA 201 87426
  July 99  HPL 215 95072
  Aug 99  HPL 215 102775
  Sept 99  HPL 215 110502

 Meter 5192 Sarco Lateral

  No deal has ever been set up for meter 5192 for Duke Energy & Trading.
There is flow for May, July and Nov. 99.

Will you please let me know if you set up new deals for these meters?

Thanks.

Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 03:17
PM ---------------------------

Fred Boas
05/04/2000 12:08 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sarco Lateral and Crow O'Connor Meters

Aimee:

The Crow O'Connor, meter 6757 has its gas allocated to Strangers Gas for
April and May 1999 and Duke has been calling Settlements asking for their
money.  I will need to set up accounting arrangements for this meter for
these months so please provide me the correct transportation contract and
valid deal # for this transaction.

In addition, the Sarco Lateral, meter 5192 has its gas allocated to Strangers
Gas for May and July 1999 and Duke has been calling Settlements asking for
their money.  I will need to set up accounting arrangements for this meter
for these months so please provide me the correct transportation contract and
valid deal # for this transaction.

I would like to get this done ASAP since the customer is calling Settlements
and we start close next week.

Thanks,

Fred


You indicated that you are interested in creating your own expense reports.
Please follow the attached instructions in creating your profile.  I will
provide you with special expense report envelopes and the office procedures
that we will be following in submitting expense reports.  If you have any
problems getting started, just let me know.

Kathy

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathryn Sheppard/PDX/ECT on 03/13/2001
04:14 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Judy Knepshield @ ENRON                           03/02/2001 04:40 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Employees United States
cc:

Subject: Web Based Expense Report Implementation Deadline

XMS COMMUNICATION

The Expense Management System (XMS) is a tool used to electronically submit
your expense report for approval and payment through the Enron Intranet. It
is user friendly, accurate and less labor intensive for you and our
accounting staff. This product was initially made available October 15, 2000
and approximately 50% of the Houston employees are currently using it to
submit their expense reports.  Our goal is to have all Enron employees using
the XMS system by April 15 (income tax day*easy to remember).

There are some changes coming to the Accounts Payable (AP) Department that
are compelling us to fully utilize the XMS system.  In the near future paper
and e-mail directed expense reports will not be accepted.  If you are unsure
of how to use the XMS system there is training available through LEAP that
will explain how to use the system. The following training information is
from the December 14th Enron Announcement about XMS:

TRAINING
 Go to the IT Central web page.  Select Services>Training.  Click on
"Schedules" in the North America column, and go to the XMS Workshop schedule
to choose your class.  If no> classes are listed, call the training
department and place your request at (713) 853-1816.  Those in outlying
locations and those who prefer on-line training can use LEAP by signing on to
isc.enron.com and clicking on "training and education," then LEAP (shown as a
link).  Use xms (lower case) as the User ID and Password.
DOCUMENTATION
Step by Step documentation is also available from IT Central web page. Select
Services>Training. Click on  "Documentation" in the North America column and
choose XMS User's Guide from the list.

    APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Call the ISC help desk at (713) 345-4SAP (4727).  Do not call Accounts
Payable with questions about how to use the system or with issues regarding
electronic pre-populated data.


Tana, I don't seem to have received a copy of the published supplement.  I'd
appreciate it if you arranged for a copy to be forwarded to me.  Thanks.

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 2000-07-07 12:58
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           2000-03-13 21:11

To: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie
Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT,
Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter
Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2000 Supplement to the 1993 ISDA Commodity Derivatives Definitions

ISDA has published the referenced supplement.  Among other changes, the
supplement adds hundreds of new gas, liquids and power price sources.  Copies
will be distributed to you.


Suanne,

Attached please find a blacklined draft to the Schedule.  This draft reflects
a few minor changes to the Guaranty from the draft you received last week.
Please call me at 713-220-4124 with any comments or questions.

Jason Peters

 - Blacklin.DOC


Start Date: 12/23/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122321.txt


who is this?


Dec. 21, 2000
Teco Tap  0.000 / Enron ; 18.750 / HPL Gas Daily

Dec. 22, 2000
Teco Tap  30.000 / Enron ; 80.417 / HPL Gas Daily

Dec. 23, 2000
Teco Tap  0.000 / Enron ; 6.250 / HPL Gas Daily

Dec. 24, 2000
Teco Tap  40.000 / Enron ; 110.000 / HPL Gas Daily

Dec. 25, 2000
Teco Tap  40.000 / Enron ; 110.000 / HPL Gas Daily


OK by me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Piper, Greg
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:44 AM
To: Webb, Jay; Richter, Brad; Puthigai, Savita
Cc: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject: FW: Create Limit Order pop up -- does the Enron trader have the ability to accept the order before it goes live to the world?

I would make it so it reads inone section ", then Enron will change its price to show a tighter market that reflects the price at which you are willing to buy from us or sell to us."

Your thoughts?

GP
-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:54 PM
To: Piper, Greg
Subject: FW: Create Limit Order pop up -- does the Enron trader have the ability to accept the order before it goes live to the world?

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:19 AM
To: Webb, Jay
Subject: Create Limit Order pop up -- does the Enron trader have the ability to accept the order before it goes live to the world?

Create Limit Order
Clicking Submit in the Create Limit Order panel creates an order that will remain in the EnronOnline system until the order is either filled at your specified price or expires after a specified time limit. If, during that time, the price you entered falls between the Enron's  Bid and Offer posted on EnronOnline, then EnronOnline [m1] will change [m2] its price to show a new market with a tighter spread that reflects your limit order the price at which you are willing to trade with us*.

You can cancel an existing limit order at any time before it is filled by highlighting the order in the Today's Orders screen and clicking Cancel.

*Multiple limit orders for the same price will be prioritized by the time of submission. Only limit orders that are between EnronOnline's Bid and Offer prices will create a new EnronOnline market on the Quotes screen.

  _____

  [m1]EnronOnline itself isn't trading so we need to be careful not to give that impression.
  [m2]This is the key! - we are changing our price, not showing their price.


please correct
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000
12:19 PM ---------------------------

Sabrina Whaley@ENRON
10/17/2000 10:34 AM
To: Rick Baltz/HOU/EES@EES, Misty Barrett/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jim Brown/HOU/EES@EES,
Brian Keith Butler/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Ford Cooper/HOU/EES@EES, Cory
Crofton/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/ENRON@Gateway, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Mike Harris/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Shawn Kilchrist/NA/Enron@Enron, Dana Lee/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Nina
Nguyen/HOU/EES@EES, Lou Pai and Tom White/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Polk/HOU/EES@EES,
George W Posey/HOU/EES@EES, David Saindon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Wade Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Jim Badum/HOU/EES@EES, Ronnie
Shields/HOU/EES@EES, Kristin Albrecht/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn
Bellinghausen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, John
Berggren/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kenny Bickett/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Boyle/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob
Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick L Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou Casari/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Kent Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky Caudle/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Craig Childers/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Cilia/NA/Enron@Enron, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/ENRON@Gateway, Glenn
Darrah/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lori Denison/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Timothy J
Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janell Dye/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Echols/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon E Sullo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jill Erwin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Archie N Eubanks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rodney Faldyn/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stanley Farmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Fowler/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sonya M Gasdia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Glassford/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Monte L
Gleason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eve Grauer/HOU/EES@EES, Paige B Grumulaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bill Gulyassy/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Gunther/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Stephen Harper/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Henderson/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Hickey/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean A
Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Shirley A Hudler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Hudler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gene Humphrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Jernigan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila Kahanek/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Shawn Kilchrist/NA/Enron@Enron, Faith
Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron,
Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Leboe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Ledbetter/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Connie Lee/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Billy
Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tod A Lindholm/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark E
Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Phillip D Lord/LON/ECT@ECT, Drew C
Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Arvel Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Mayo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie McGinnis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monty McMahen/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kellie Metcalf/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Trevor Mihalik/NA/Enron@Enron, Gayle W
Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nina
Nguyen/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Peterson/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Polk/HOU/EES@EES, George W Posey/HOU/EES@EES,
Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Quaintance/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Monica
Reasoner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart G
Rexrode/LON/ECT@ECT, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mark
Ruane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Rub/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elaine Schield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven (PGE) SCHNEIDER/ENRON@Gateway,
Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Selzer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cris Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Shields/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave Sorenson/ENRON@Gateway, Wade
Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Tate/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gail Tholen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Warner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Todd Warwick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jimmie Williams/HOU/EES@EES, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mark P Wilson/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 21st Annual Energy Symposium Correction

There was a misprint in the prior message regarding the dates of the
Symposium.  This year's Aurthur Andersen Energy Symposium will be held
November 28th and 29th.

Thanks,
Sabrina


EOL report for TV in conference on 33

Cash

-Hehub
-Chicago
-PEPL
-Katy
          -Waha

Prompt Month Nymex


A few updates.

Debra


User iD:  enron
PW:        library

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Law.com/tx" <tx_case_alert+410717.153596706.1@reply.law.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 6:01 AM
To:	Hu, Sylvia
Subject:	Texas Case Alert, October 26, 2001

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

       L A W . C O M / T E X A S

           C A S E  A L E R T

                  for

        O C T O B E R 2 6,  2 0 0 1

<http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940965>

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

***  Current News on Law.com/TX  ***

14th Court Extends Deadly Weapon Finding
Texas Lawyer
Houston's 14th Court of Appeals may have handed prosecutors another
plea bargaining tool on Oct. 11 when it upheld a jury's finding
that a man found guilty of failing to stop and render aid used a
"deadly weapon" in the commission of the offense. In a 2-1
decision, the court held in Cates v. Texas that a rational jury
could conclude from the evidence that Johnny Weldon Cates II
operated his pickup truck in a manner capable of causing death or
serious injury when he left the scene of a fatal accident that he
caused.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940966

Read more Texas legal news
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940967

***  5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals  ***

REAL ESTATE - CIVIL RIGHTS
Banks v. Dallas Housing Authority
The now-repealed provision of 42 U.S.C. ?1437f(e) requiring that
public housing authorities make assistance payments only to those
property owners who keep public housing "decent, safe, and
sanitary" neither displays Congressional intent to create a private
right of action nor creates a federal right that is judicially
enforceable through 42 U.S.C. ?1983. 5th Cir. No. 00-11160; Posted
October 24, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940968

***  Texas Supreme Court  ***

REAL ESTATE - CONDEMNATION
Interstate Northborough Partnership v. State
Damages resulting from a commercial property's increased proximity
to a roadway, with attendant loss of curb appeal, green space and
"buffer" zone, are special rather than community damages. Supreme
Court of Texas, No. 00-0070; Posted October 25, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940969

***  Texas Court of Criminal Appeals  ***

CRIMINAL LAW - DEFERRED ADJUDICATION
Williams v. State
In an appeal from the adjudication of guilt, the appellant may
appeal a jurisdictional issue concerning the original deferred
adjudication proceeding, but not the voluntariness of the guilty
plea. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 697-01; Posted October
24, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940970

CRIMINAL LAW - DEFERRED ADJUDICATION
Northington v. State
In an appeal from the adjudication of guilt, the appellant may
appeal a jurisdictional issue concerning the original deferred
adjudication proceeding, but not the voluntariness of the guilty
plea. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 700-01; Posted October
24, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940971

CRIMINAL LAW - CAPITAL MURDER
Thompson v. State
Even if the victim's doctors' conduct was clearly sufficient to
cause her death, the defendant is not absolved of responsibility
unless his own conduct is "clearly insufficient" to produce the
death. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 73-431; Posted October
24, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940972

CRIMINAL LAW - MANDATORY SUPERVISION RELEASE
Ex Parte Shook
When the Board of Pardons and Parole gives the inmate notice of a
specific date on which the hearing is scheduled to take place, the
inmate is entitled to rely on that information and accordingly has
until that date to submit relevant information on his behalf. Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 74-085; Posted October 24, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940973

CRIMINAL LAW - DUE PROCESS
Ex Parte Boyd
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 42.014 and Texas Penal
Code ?12.47 violated the applicant's right to due process by
removing from the jury the assessment of a fact (that the applicant
chose his victim because of bias or prejudice) that increased the
prescribed range of penalties to which applicant was exposed. Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 74-121; Posted October 24, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940974

***  Texas Courts of Appeal  ***

HEALTH LAW - GOOD SAMARITAN
Ramirez v. McIntyre
A doctor falls within the protection of the Good Samaritan statute
only if he or she would not customarily receive remuneration for
the services performed and would not legally be entitled to
remuneration; it is of no consequence that the person claiming
protection waives or elects not to charge for the medical
assistance. Austin Court of Appeals, No. 03-01-00027-CV; Posted
October 25, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940975

EMPLOYMENT LAW - WHISTLEBLOWER ACT
Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation v.
Olofsson
Noncompliance with the limitation period of Texas Government Code
?554.005 gives rise to the affirmative defense of limitations, but
it is not grounds for a plea to the jurisdiction. Austin Court of
Appeals, No. 03-01-00203-CV; Posted October 25, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940976

CRIMINAL LAW - ACCOMPLICE TESTIMONY
Worthen v. State
The court did not err by submitting the question of whether a
witness is an accomplice to the jury as a fact issue because it was
not clear from the evidence whether the witness was an accomplice.
Austin Court of Appeals, No. 03-01-00019-CR; Posted October 25,
2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940977

INSURANCE LAW - COVERAGE
Duke Energy Field Services Assets, L.L.C. v. National Union Fire
Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
When a subsidiary enters into a contract and that subsidiary is
then merged into a parent corporation, the contracts of the
subsidiary are treated as contracts with the parent. Texarkana
Court of Appeals, No. 06-01-00024-CV; Posted October 24, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940978

CRIMINAL LAW - INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL
Blount v. State
In a case alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, the court's
review of counsel's representation is highly deferential; the fact
that another attorney, even the defendant's own attorney on
appeal, might have pursued a different course of action does not
necessarily indicate ineffective assistance. Texarkana Court of
Appeals, No. 06-00-00171-CR; Posted October 24, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940979

FAMILY LAW - PARENTAL TERMINATION
In the Interest of L.L.
In proceedings where the Texas Department of Protective and
Regulatory Services is prosecuting an action to terminate parental
rights, a final order must be entered concerning the child no later
than one year after the department becomes the temporary managing
conservator of a child or the suit must be dismissed. Amarillo
Court of Appeals, No. 07-00-0545-CV; Posted October 23, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940980

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

The law.com/texas Case Alert is a service of law.com/texas located
at http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940981. SHARING THIS ALERT WITH SOMEONE WHO IS
NOT A SUBSCRIBER IS UNLAWFUL. By using this service, you also are
agreeing to abide by our terms of service. If you haven't read
them, please go to
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940982.

To register for a free trial to law.com/texas, go to
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940981 and click on the Trial Subscription button.

For other information please reply to: mailto:tx-info@corp.law.com

For our full Privacy Policy, please go to
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=410717&d=1940984

TO BE REMOVED FROM MAILING LIST:
If you would like to be removed from the law.com/texas Case Alert
mailing list, you can unsubscribe by simply replying to this email
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.

You are subscribed to the law.com/texas Case Alert with the
following e-mail address:sylvia.hu@enron.com

Copyright (c) 2001 law.com. Registered in the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office. All rights reserved.


Hertzberg (speaker of the CA Assembly) called a meeting yesterday afternoon
of the group of market participants that have been negotiating the
"core/noncore" proposal in California.  The purpose of the meeting was to
brief us on their activities and their gameplan for trying to find a solution
for California.  Here's a summary of the meeting.  Please keep confidential.

Work will be done over the weekend to put the core/noncore proposal in
legislative language.  (We will be in the room.)
Work done by the "Plan B" group in the Assembly (Joe Dutra and Joe Nation)
will also be put into legislative language over the weekend.
Because no proposal is "comprehensive," a complete legislative package will
be created from the various pieces that have been worked on thus far (i.e.,
core/noncore, "Plan B," Edison MOU)
In addition, there are Republican demands that Hertzberg will need to address
(e.g., end the litigation) in order to achieve bi-partison support, which is
what Hertzberg's shooting for.
To move the legislation, the plan is to establish a "conference committee,"
comprised of an equal number of Democrats and Republicans.
The committe would begin work on Monday and would attempt to finish putting a
comprehensive bill together, vote it out of the Legislature and send it to
the Governor for signing by Monday, July 16th.
July 16th is the deadline because that is the date that the PUC will issue
its proposed decision regarding, among other things, how DWR's revenue
requirement will be put into rates, whether Direct Access needs to be
suspended, etc.
The PUC is issuing the draft on the 16th in order to give everyone 30 days to
review and comment before the Commission votes on a final order on August
15th.  (The PUC will actually issue a "thought piece" on Monday the 9th and
will use reactions to the "thought piece" to craft the develop the proposed
decision it plans to issue on the 16th.)
All of this is still up in the air, however.  As of right now, the leader of
the Senate (Burton) has not agreed to Hertzberg's gameplan and the
Republicans, while interested, have not yet committed to join the process.


I just spoke with Holli, and she reported that the confirmation has been
awaiting a signature at Grant County for the past week. She said she plans to
send it to Kim Theriot as soon as she gets it back. Let me know if that
sounds good; otherwise, I can ask her about sending you an unsigned copy.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           02/06/2001 11:19 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 420529.01

Did you receive the executed copy of this deal there in your office?  We do
not show that we have received an executed copy of this confirmation from the
counterparty.  If you do not have the executed copy of the deal, please send
me the copy you faxed to the counterparty and we will send it again and try
to get it executed.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 01:07
PM ---------------------------
   Kim S Theriot                02/06/2001 11:57 AM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal 420529.01

Sharen,
I saw that there was a note on this deal that Legal prepared the confirmation
and Holli Krebs sent it to the counterparty herself.  Can you obtain a copy
of what they sent for our files.  There is nothing in Livelink and if we
would ever need to reproduce the document we would have nothing.  Also, it
shows that it has not been singned unless Portland has a signed copy.

Kim


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001 09:39
AM ---------------------------

Mike Grigsby
01/01/2001 08:26 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cash books, etc.

I have been thinking about the cash book idea for group and I think we need
to discuss this in more detail.  I would like to continue to use the physical
for large prompt positions going forward.  I am afraid that the baseload
volumes may not continue on their current trend if we break out the books.
We need to discuss how the cash books would lay off risk.  i.e. Intra
regional spreads with GD swap legs or spreads with other cash points and then
booking out at gd mid to the internal counterparty.  Janie managing SJ and
laying off risk on Steve's Opal.  I know that the cash books would be a good
idea for dailies , but I am not sure how to do this without giving up the
cash risk for baseload as well.  What are your thoughts?

I would also like to discuss the staffing issues.  Matt Smith and Susan Scott
to analyst,  Jay to the ROX, etc.  It seems like Ken S. has shown more
interest in the west fundies lately.  Should we keep his services?

The basis products need another book.  Who can we add to the mix?  I think
that we should look into having Frank focus on prompt month only.  He has a
great interest in cash and fundies and this should serve him well in managing
tight two ways for all products on the prompt.  Keith can do term with
another book.

Monique is going to take over the gd swaps for Kern, SJ, and Perm.  I will
continue to manage the CA products.  This should allow us to provide tighter
two ways across the west. I will continue to manage all index products and
prompt month phys fixed price.

Operations needs more labor as well as an analyst or two to monitor flows.
The analysts will monitor flows by price and hopefully find creative ways to
nom the market.

EOL.  Keith has a great idea of opening up all products to the desk so that
you may insert a bid or an offer inside of the manager's markets.  We should
propose this to EOL.  This would allow for tighter markets on all products
and prevent the desk from working markets through the brokers.

Ca cash products.  Let's call a meeting about how to offer more Socal
physical products.  I would like to have PG&E topock and Socal Ehrenberg
before the summer.

Mike


Attached is a first draft of the GPG rehearing of Order 637.  At this point
please just review the document for overall tone and to ensure that I
included all the appropriate points.  I would appreciate this initial
feedback by noon Friday, March 3.   I will return a second draft by COB on
Friday and you can may any detailed edits on the second draft.

Also attached are draft INGAA comments.


Nice.  how much?

Are you trying to keep the economy going?


David is doing well, too.  He is working contract, having quit Burlington
Resources about a year ago so that his work schedule could be more flexible.
Yes, Tammy is still with us.  We marked our 10 year anniversary with her in
March, except for that six month period when she was with her dad in
Kentucky.  I truly am blessed.  --Sally

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     08/10/2000 07:11 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: excitement

Sally --

How's David?  Do you still have Tammy watching the kids?  I'm amazed that
Tyler is already 2 1/2.  I bet he is just precious -- boys just have so much
energy and are so soft-hearted.  I'm sure you feel so blessed -- you are.

Wishing you a good day,
Griff

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           08/09/2000 09:28 AM

To: Mary Griff Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: excitement

It was great to see a friendly face!  Don't ever hesitate to wave or stop in
and say hello.  Can you believe that I had been on the 30th floor since the
summer of 1994?!  I know that sets some kind of record at Enron!!  It is kind
of fun to be up here.  The appreciation for the jobs that we do in operations
has grown over the last several years, thanks to the hard work of you and so
many others.

My family is doing great.  The children start school tomorrow.  Meagan will
be a junior in high school -- we took a brief trip with her this summer for
an early look at some colleges.  It will be a big year for Amanda -- she
starts junior high in 6th grade.  And Tyler would tell you proudly that he is
"two and a half".  What a delight he continues to be!!

I know that Erin has worked hard.  I hope that she and her husband are doing
well.  --Sally

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     08/08/2000 08:51 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: excitement

Sally --

I acted impulsively when I saw you this a.m.  I was so excited to know you
were on the 33rd floor where I was picking up United Way shirts that I didn't
control my enthusiasm over seeing you.

I apologize if I disrupted you.

Griff

P.S.  I hope your family is doing fine.  Erin graduates in December from
UT-Dallas with her masters in Speech Path.  She and her husband are doing
very well and very much in love.


Tana, Peter asked me to e-mail this to you:

AECO &C8 MONTHLY INDEX (Canadian)

CONTRACT PRICE:	The Contract Price, for each delivery Month, shall be a price in
Canadian dollars per GJ equal to the AECO &C8 Monthly Index, minus/plus Cdn.
$____ per GJ, where:  &AECO &C8 Monthly Index8 means the price in Canadian
dollars per GJ in the &Avg8 column published in the table &Canadian Natural
Gas Supply Prices8, in the Canadian Gas Price Reporter, in the row for
&Alberta-AECO &C8 & NIT One-Month Spot8, for the applicable delivery Month.
	NOTE:  Please insert appropriate &Seller,s Payment8 if &minus8 is used in
Contract Price and if Customer is the Seller.  Do not insert &Seller,s
Payment8 if Enron Canada is Seller.


Let's wait until Monday.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Richard,
 I just got off the phone with Nancy Pickover, a Bracewell paralegal,
who obtained for us the CPUC filing with FERC.  She is sending the 500 page
document overnight to me and to you Richard.  I will get a copy to Mike Day.
She is faxing the 16 page pleading and one of the exhibits immediately.  In
essence AES, Williams, Duke, Dynegy, Reliant and Southern are the named
entities.  As soon as we have more I will let you know.

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Todd,

We are in receipt of the Confidentiality Agreement and have only a few minor
changes:

Enron North America Corp. not - Enron North America, Inc.
Greg Whalley, President and Chief Operating Officer not - President and Chief
Operation Officer

ENA is prepared to sign the Agreement at the to-be-scheduled meeting.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
Executive Assistant to Greg Whalley

Todd Creek <tcreek@mindspring.com> on 04/04/2000 10:04:40 AM
Please respond to "creek@apbenergy.com" <creek@apbenergy.com>
To: "'gwhalle@enron.com'" <gwhalle@enron.com>
cc: Dennis Crum <Windows@mindspring.com>
Subject: Nondisclosure Agreement (NDA)

Greg,

Per request of Dennis Crum, please find attached the proposed NDA between
Enron, True Quote LLC and APB Energy, Inc.  The document can be executed by
initialing each page, signing the last page and faxing to my attention at
the number below.  I will then sign the document and return to you by fax.
 Please contact Dennis Crum or me at the number below with any questions or
comments.  At your earliest convenience, please contact Dennis at
502-327-1400 to schedule a meeting.

Thanks,
Todd A. Creek
True Quote LLC
(502) 327-1400 Main
(502) 608-6500 Mobile
(502) 327-1407 Fax
creek@apbenergy.com

 - NDA_Enron_April2000__.doc


SCOTT'S WEATHER FOR 6/8/2001

-----------------------------------------------------------

=========================
YOUR WEATHER CHANGE ALERT
=========================

Houston, TX

Thunderstorms expected Friday

weather.com
http://ww9.lfmn.com/s/s.asp?q=1004428047l1c141500r2315e1S8180

Detailed Forecast
http://www.weather.com/weather/local/USTX0617

Storm Watch
http://ww9.lfmn.com/s/s.asp?q=1004428047l3c141500r2315e1S8180

-----------------------------------------------------------
**ADVERTISEMENTS**

-----------------------------------------------------------

SCOTT'S weather.com

Improve My weather  Profile
http://ww9.lfmn.com/s/s.asp?q=1004428047l1c163279r2315e1s8180

Change My Registration Information
http://ww9.lfmn.com/s/s.asp?q=1004428047l2c163279r2315e1s8180

Unsubscribe
http://ww9.lfmn.com/s/s.asp?q=1004428047l3c163279r2315e1s8180

Contact Us
http://ww9.lfmn.com/s/s.asp?q=1004428047l4c163279r2315e1s8180

Privacy Policy
http://ww9.lfmn.com/s/s.asp?q=1004428047l5c163279r2315e1s8180

Powered by LifeMinders.com
http://ww9.lfmn.com/s/s.asp?q=1004428047l7c163279r2315e1s8180

Your e-mail address on record with Weather.com is scott.hendrickson@enron.com.

Weather.com e-mails are never sent unsolicited. Weather.com only sends e-mails to registered members. If you would like to unsubscribe, please click below.
http://ww9.lfmn.com/s/s.asp?q=1004428047l6c163279r2315e1s8180
or send an email with "unsubscribe" in the subject line to Weather@lifeminders.com.

Copyright ? 2000 Weather.com, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.


law.com's legal newswire
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

	career center?????seminars?????legal newswire?????customer service?????free
email
 June 8, 2001 	?

 Plea Deal Betrayed in D.C. Assault Case
Legal Times
Lorenzo Roye, charged with assault with intent to kill and facing a life
sentence, thought he had a good deal: In exchange for a guilty plea on
aggravated assault, the U.S. Attorney's Office would drop the attempted
murder count and recommend a sentence of time served, plus probation. But
during sentencing, neither the prosecutor, defense counsel, nor the judge
remembered the agreement. Now the D.C. Court of Appeals says he got a raw
deal.
 Full Text

 Federal Judge Tosses Out Class Action Over Credit Card's Claim of 'Fixed'
Rate
The Legal Intelligencer
A federal judge in Philadelphia dismissed a claim under the Truth in Lending
Act in a class action suit in which the plaintiff claimed she was falsely
promised a "fixed" rate of 7.99 percent only to see it raised to 10.5 percent
a year later. The judge found that the TILA has a narrow scope and requires
only that banks disclose all of the terms that will apply to credit card
holders on the day they receive the card.
 Full Text

 IBP's Failure to Meet Merger Terms Voids Deal, Argues Tyson
The Deal
IBP Inc.'s failure to abide by terms of a merger agreement with Tyson Foods
Inc. gives Tyson the right to void the $4.7 billion deal, the poultry giant
argues in the final set of briefs filed following a nine-day trial. In the
brief filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery, Tyson contends it has the
right to terminate the merger regardless of whether it knew of IBP's alleged
violations before signing the contract.
Full Text

 Federal Judge Rules for Tribe in New York Tax Dispute
New York Law Journal
Expressing frustration that the judiciary is left to clean up the Indian land
claim mess, a federal judge in New York has barred an upstate city and county
from collecting property taxes levied against the Oneida Nation. The judge
held that under the 207-year-old Treaty of Canandaigua, the land at issue in
Madison and Oneida counties is "Indian Country" and, as such, is immune from
property taxes.
Full Text

 Exxon Gets Hit by Another Jury, This Time for $1 Billion
The National Law Journal
Despite a string of courtroom defeats -- including three massive jury
verdicts in six months -- ExxonMobil vows it will not change its approach to
litigation. Its llegal strategies "will continue to be dependent on the facts
and circumstances of each case," the company said. Most recently, the oil
giant was stung by a $1.06 billion award in Louisiana over alleged
radioactive contamination of a plot of land owned by a retired state judge.
Full Text

ADVERTISEMENT

 WANT MORE BUSINESS FROM YOUR WEB SITE? Attend "How to Make Your Web Site a
RainMaker" live via Internet, Thursday, June 14th at 12:00 pm Central time.
Learn Web tactics and strategies to increase business, drive quality traffic
to your site, better serve existing clients and reach the vast Internet
market. For details, registration and testimonials see:
www.lawmarketing.com/webseminar/rainmaker.html

 Lawmakers Argue for Protection Against Genetic Discrimination
The Associated Press
In his first appearance promoting a specific bill since becoming Senate
majority leader, Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., moved to build momentum behind
legislation to prohibit employers and insurance companies from using people's
DNA to discriminate in hiring, promotions or health care coverage.
Full Text

 La Vida Lawyer: Breaking Away
law.com
As the California AIDS Ride wraps up this week in Los Angeles, Sarah Kowalski
and J. Dominic Campodonico will have accomplished what few associates have
even attempted: six months of intense training on top of a demanding law firm
schedule and then riding 575 miles along the hilly California coast. Also in
this week's La Vida Lawyer, tips for summer associates on where to wine and
dine in New York and Philadelphia.
 Visit La Vida Lawyer

ADVERTISEMENT

 DepoStreamv
RealLegal Application Solutions
Attend a deposition anytime, anywhere via the Internet with RealLegal
DepoStreamv. Even if you can't make it across town, you and your support team
can log on for live collaboration. DepoStream is a Web-based realtime text
feed from your court reporter of remote trial or deposition transcripts
complete with secure chat functionality. Click here for a sample DepoStream
broadcast.

 3rd Circuit Gives Lessons on Attorneys' Fees
The Legal Intelligencer
Reversing awards of attorneys' fees in two discrimination cases, the 3rd U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals is sending a message to trial judges: show your
work. The two unpublished opinions are full of important holdings on a
variety of thorny issues such as what to do about excessive charges for
faxing and copying, and how to calculate hourly fees for lawyers, paralegals
and associates.
Visit the Litigation Practice Center

 You Can't Go Home Again
The Recorder
Peter Astiz is one of the lucky few. His dot-com job as the top lawyer at
Emusic.com Inc. wasn't necessarily everything he hoped it would be. So after
20 months he returned to the fold at his old firm, Gray Cary Ware &
Freidenrich. But for most out-of-work in-house lawyers these days, returning
to the firm fold is proving difficult, if not impossible.
Full Text

 Napster Adds More Legal Firepower
The Industry Standard
For the latest member of its all-star legal defense team, embattled song-swap
service Napster has tapped Jonathan Schwartz, a former deputy to former U.S.
Attorney General Janet Reno who cut his teeth battling independent counsel
Kenneth Starr. Schwartz joins Napster as general counsel, reporting to
interim CEO Hank Barry.
Full Text
Visit the Tech Law Practice Center

You may unsubscribe from the Legal Newswire at any time by sending an e-mail
message with "UNSUBSCRIBE NEWSWIRE-HTML" (without the quotation marks) in the
body of the e-mail. This e-mail must be sent from the address at which you
are receiving the newswire. To unsubscribe, click here.

If you are not sending the above 'UNSUBSCRIBE NEWSWIRE-HTML' message from the
SAME address at which you currently receive the Newswire and would like to be
removed, please click here.

Questions? Comments? Complaints? Send us e-mail

By using law.com's Legal Newswire, you are agreeing to abide by our Terms of
Service.

(c) 2001 law.com
				ADVERTISEMENT

				ADVERTISEMENT

				Practice Centers
				Corporate Law
				Employment Law
				IP Law
				Litigation
				Tech Law

				States
				New York
				California
				Pennsylvania
				New Jersey
				Other States

				Automated Lawyer
				Spotlight
				Tech News
				Reviews & Tips
				Product Info

				Applications
				RealLegal
				E-Brief
				E-Transcript
				E-Transcript Binder
				MA3000
				Practice Manager
				Press Releases

				Want to see your message on this Newswire? Click here.


I got the confirmation that you are signed up for Deriviatives I on Aug. 9
and 10, so you don't need to worry about it.  I will be taking the class too!

We are trying to track you down an office.  Our floor is completely full
right now, between permanent people and contract workers, so we're having to
do some shifting.  They are getting ready to rebuild the floor, maybe build
some more internal offices or make some smaller, because of the lack of
space.  Something y'all can relate to there in London!


Car Rental Options for Enron Travelers

Rental car contracts for 2001 have been awarded to:

National Car Rental (Primary) and  Alamo Rent-A-Car (Secondary).

The intent of these agreements is to consolidate and leverage Enron's total car rental spend to achieve the most favorable rates and non-pricing provisions (i.e. insurance).

National Car Rental, due to its service levels, availability and total value proposition, has been awarded Primary status and is recommended as the first choice for Enron travelers' needs.

Alamo Rent-A-Car, a sister company to National, has been awarded a contract reflecting a Secondary status, due to its service levels, availability and low cost solutions.  Alamo is recommended as an alternative to National, where available.

When you rent a vehicle in the United States, (including Puerto Rico) or Canada, the following insurance provisions are included, regardless of rate selected:
1.	L/DW (Loss/Damage Waiver) - This is what is called Comprehensive or Collision on your personal auto. It covers the rental vehicle and pays for any damage to it.
2.	Liability - This covers people and property outside the rental vehicle. For both National and Alamo, the coverage is $100,000 per person, $300,000 per occurrence and $50,000 for property damage.
** IMPORTANT ***
These coverages apply regardless of rate selected, as long as the following contract ID is communicated at the time of reservation and rental is recorded on the transaction rental agreement.  (National -  5000838 Alamo    - #143974)
To enjoy the highest levels of service while renting a vehicle from Enron's preferred suppliers, it is recommended that each traveler enroll in National's and Alamo's preferred traveler programs.  National's Emerald Club membership and Alamo's Quicksilver program are designed to speed the transaction time by providing services such as counter bypass and rapid return.  The enrollment fees for these programs have been waived for Enron travelers.  Enrollment packets will be mailed to the addresses of Enron American Express T&E Cardholders.  You may also find an enrollment form on the Enron Travel Program intranet @ gss.enron.com <http://gss.enron.com/>.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact Jeff Leath at 713-646-6165.


Dan

I'm leaving for a couple of weeks.  I'll get you my computer when I come back.

John


Board of Directors
Sara Adler, Esq. *|**
Law Office of Sara Adler
Howard J. Aibel, Esq. +|++
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
C. Mark Baker, Esq.
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
William B. Baker *
Vice President, Emeritus
University of California
William L.D. Barrett, Esq. *
Hollyer Brady Smith Troxell Barrett Rockett Hines & Mone LLP
William L. Bergan, Esq.
Bond, Schoeneck & King, LLP
Hon. Nicholas J. Bua
Burke, Weaver, Prell, Holland & Knight
Christine W.S. Byrd, Esq.
Irell & Manella LLP
Don Cameron
Executive Director
National Education Association
Joe F. Canterbury, Jr., Esq.
Canterbury, Stuber, Elder, Gooch & Surratt, P.C.
James H. Carter, Esq. *|**
Sullivan & Cromwell
Gilbert F. Casellas
President and Chief Operating Officer
The Swarthmore Group
Louis L.C. Chang, Esq.
Kuniyuki & Chang
Richard Chernick, Esq.
Zela G. Claiborne, Esq.
Theodore J. Collins
Senior Vice President
Law & Contracts
The Boeing Company
Peter D. Collisson, Esq.
Robert Coulson +|++
Scott A. Crozier, Esq.
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
PETsMART, Inc.
Edward S.G. Dennis, Jr., Esq.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Roger L. Desjadon
Chief Operating Officer
Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company
J. Richard Devlin
Executive Vice President
General Counsel and External Affairs
Sprint
Deborah Enix-Ross
Senior Legal Officer
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
World Intellectual Property Organization
John D. Feerick *|**
Dean
Fordham University Law School
Sandra Feldman
President
American Federation of Teachers, AFL)CIO
Linda K. Foley
President
The Newspaper Guild)CWA
George S. Frazza, Esq.
Of Counsel
Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler LLP
Robert E. Garber
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
AXA Financial, Inc.
Hon. Joyce J. George
Emeritus
Hon. John J. Gibbons
Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione
Reynaldo P. Glover
President
TLC )LC, Inc.
James P. Groton, Esq.
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
Bobby Marzine Harges
Professor
Loyola University
New Orleans, School of Law
C. C. Harness, III, Esq.
Harness & Associates, Inc.
Conrad K. Harper, Esq. *|**
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
Sally A. Harpole, Esq.
Deacons Graham & James
Norman M. Hinerfeld +|++
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Delta Group
Kay H. Hodge, Esq.
Stoneman, Chandler & Miller LLP
James R. Holbrook, Esq.
Callister Nebeker & McCullough
Bud Geo. Holman, Esq. *|**
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Hon. Howard M. Holtzmann +|++
Judith Richards Hope, Esq.
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
William K. Hoskins
President
Hoskins & Associates
Jane Howard-Martin, Esq. *|**
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jerry M. Hunter, Esq.***
Bryan Cave LLP
R. William Ide III *|**
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Monsanto Company
Richard K. Jeydel ***
Senior Vice President
Secretary and General Counsel
Kanematsu USA Inc.
Joia M. Johnson *|**
Vice President and General Counsel
RARE Hospitality International, Inc.
Arthur E. Joyce
Senior Counsel ) Labor and Employment Law
General Electric Company
Jeffrey B. Kindler
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
McDonald,s Corporation
Bernard T. King, Esq.
Blitman & King LLP
Edward V. Lahey, Jr. *|**
General Counsel
Essex Boat Works, Inc.
L. Gene Lemon, Esq.
Frankie Fook-Lun Leung, Esq.
Sanford M. Litvack
Vice Chairman of the Board
The Walt Disney Company
Richard S. Lombard, Esq. +|++
Carlos E. Loumiet, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, P.A.
Vincent J. Love, C.P.A. ++
Partner
Kramer & Love
E. Nobles Lowe, Esq. +|++
Lewis Maltby
President
National Workrights Institute
Siri S. Marshall
Senior Vice President,
Corporate Affairs and General Counsel
General Mills
LaBrena Jones Martin
Director
General Counsel
Law and Compliance
RBC Dominion Securities Corporation
Kenneth R. Masterson
Executive Vice President
General Counsel and Secretary
FedEx Corporation
Maud Mater
Executive Vice President
General Counsel & Secretary
Freddie Mac
Hon. Vincent L. McKusick
Pierce Atwood
Anne H. McNamara
Senior Vice President & General Counsel
American Airlines, Inc.
Paul S. Miller
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Pfizer Inc.
Charles R. Morgan
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
BellSouth Corporation
Sara E. Moss
Vice President and General Counsel
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Richard E. Mulroy, Esq.
Betty Southard Murphy, Esq. *
Baker & Hostetler LLP
James J. Myers, Esq.
Gadsby Hannah LLP
Lawrence O,Donnell, III
Senior Vice President
General Counsel and Secretary
Waste Management, Inc.
Martin J.Oppenheimer, Esq.
Proskauer Rose LLP
Carlos G. Ortiz
General Counsel
Goya Foods, Inc.
Richard W. Page, Esq. ***
The Page Firm
Deval L. Patrick
Vice President and General Counsel
Texaco Inc.
Roberta Cooper Ramo, Esq.
Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A.
Lucy F. Reed, Esq.
Freshfields LLP
Carlos M. Rivera-Vicente, Esq.
Cancio, Nadal, Rivera, Diaz & Berrios
David W. Rivkin, Esq.
Debevoise & Plimpton
C. Kenneth Roberts, Esq.
Norman L. Roberts, Esq.
Barbara Paul Robinson, Esq.
Debevoise & Plimpton
Robert L. Robinson, Esq.
Mark A. Roesler ***
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
CMG Worldwide, Inc.
Thomasina V. Rogers, Esq.
Landon H. Rowland
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc.
Stevan A. Sandberg
Executive Managing Director
Advisory Services Group
Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.
Diane K. Schumacher *|**
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Cooper Industries, Inc.
Dr. Siegfried Schwung
Associate General Counsel
DaimlerChrysler AG
John Scriven
Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
The Dow Chemical Company
Jerome J. Shestack, Esq.
Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, LLP
Charlie Silvestri
Marsha E. Simms, Esq. *|**
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
William K. Slate II *|**
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Arbitration Association
Janet Maleson Spencer, Esq.
Delbert L. Spurlock, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Associate Publisher
New York Daily News
Thomas J. Stipanowich
William L. Matthews Professor of Law
University of Kentucky College of Law
Donald B. Straus +|++
Pamela B. Strobel
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Commonwealth Edison Company
Michael P. Sullivan
President and Chief Executive Officer
International Dairy Queen, Inc.
John J. Sweeney
President
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations
Hon. John Charles Thomas *|**
Hunton & Williams
Robert M. Tobias
John M. Townsend, Esq. *|**
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Richard L. Trumka
Secretary ) Treasurer
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations
M. Caroline Turner
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Coors Brewing Company
Andrea E. Utecht
Senior Vice President
Secretary & General Counsel
Elf Atochem North America, Inc.
Howard D. Venzie, Jr., Esq.
Venzie, Phillips & Warshawer
Robert B. von Mehren, Esq.
Retired Partner
Debevoise & Plimpton
Richard S. Ward, Esq.
Hon. William H. Webster
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
Judith Whittaker *|**
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Hallmark Cards, Incorporated
Donald E. Wightman
National President
Utility Workers Union of America,
AFL)CIO
Michael S. Wilder
Group Senior Vice President
General Counsel
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
J. Warren Wood, III *|**
Vice President
General Counsel & Secretary
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Jack J. Woolf
Kathryn D. Wriston, Esq. *
Max Zimny *|**
General Counsel
Union of Needletrades,
Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE), AFL)CIO, CLC
* Member of the 1999 Executive Committee
** Member of the 2000 Executive Committee
*** 2000 Executive Committee Nominee
+ Past President or Chairman
++ Honorary Member of the Executive Committee


Dear Jeff
How are you? I hope everything is allrigth for you.
My father wanted to sent a letter to you. And he wrote his feelings in
Turkish and I just translated it. I think he loved you a lot..
Please find his letter below. Please say hello to Rebecca .
See you soon.
Regards

(See attached file: Dear Jeff05.doc)
_______________________________________________________________________________

Ce message ?lectronique et tous les fichiers attach?s qu'il contient sont
confidentiels et destin?s exclusivement ? l'usage de la personne ? laquelle
ils sont adress?s. Si vous avez re?u ce message par erreur, merci de le
retourner ? son ?metteur. Les id?es et opinions pr?sent?es dans ce message
sont celles de son auteur, et ne repr?sentent pas n?cessairement celles du
Groupe DANONE ou d'une quelconque de ses filiales. La publication, l'usage, la
distribution, l'impression ou la copie non autoris?e de ce message et des
attachements qu'il contient sont strictement interdits.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this email in error please send it back to the person that sent it to
you. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of its author and do not
necessarily represent those of DANONE Group or any of its subsidiary
companies. Unauthorized publication, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing
or copying of this email and its associated attachments is strictly prohibited.

_______________________________________________________________________________
 - Dear Jeff05.doc