---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 11:45
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/28/99 10:16:58 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changes to - January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/28/99
10:22 AM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/28/99 10:20 AM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Changes to - January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

Just received notification from ConAgra Energy Services.   The volume required
needs to be 120 dth per day @ meter #020030 (was 100 dth).

(meter # 020028 stays @ 596 dth).

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/28/99
11:18 AM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/27/99 02:16 PM

To: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: FINAL - REVISED - January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/99
02:15 PM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/23/99 01:11 PM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne
Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Nancy Diel/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: REVISED - January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

Please note in red the revised volumes
---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/23/99
01:10 PM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/23/99 11:05 AM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Joanne Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Nancy
Diel/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

Per the sales reps and GMS I will need the following:

100 dth per day to meter # 020030
596 dth per day to meter # 020028

I will receive a final number for these next week but this is an estimate.
(should not be that far off).


Attached is a copy of the VEPCO Interconnection Agreement on which I have
made certain changes and included comments in bracketed notes.  (Most of the
notes could be included in a mark-up sent back to VEPCO; there is one marked
"Note to Enron" that is intended to be deleted before we send this out.)

The Agreement, as might be expected, is very  one-sided and is written
primarily for their protection.  It is also very repetitive in places,
although I did not attempt to eliminate the repetition on the theory that the
fewer changes we propose the better and we can probably live with the
repetition.  There are several provisions or concepts I would like to suggest
we include from the form I had prepared a couple of weeks ago (which was
based on the EPSA model form, and was clearly more favorable to the
generation owner than VEPCO's form.)  I have not yet included these changes,
as I thought we should discuss them first and decide how best to proceed on
this draft.  Those provisions are as follows (section references are to the
draft I prepared):

2.43.  Right to tell VEPCO to suspend or terminate work on interconnection
facilities.

2.4.4  Requirement for Vepco to provide status reports on progress of
construction of interconnection facilities.

2.5.2 (maybe)  Agreement to start work on facilities before all studies
complete, if generator owner willing to bear risk of extra costs.

2.7.1 Undertaking by Vepco to use reasonable efforts to complete on schedule
(actually, if 4.2.2 is used, this section probably should not be used.)

3.11.3 (last sentence)  Vepco liable for costs for modifications to
generator-owned interconnection facilities and the Facility if changes
required because of changes to Vepco facilities (unless required by law).

4.1 Vepco must inform generator owner if costs exceed estimate by more than
10% and such increase is subject to generator owner's consent.

4.2.2 Concept that Vepco must seek bids for the work and generator owner can
choose whether the work is done with best efforts undertaking to complete on
time, but no penalties/incentives or with firm completion date and
penalties/incentives.

4.3  Generator owner to provide letter of credit for cost of work or
guarantee (as opposed to 50% paid in advance, as provided in Vepco's draft.
By the way, even if we agreed to pay 50% in advance, it should not be on
signing the agreement, but rather before they start the work.)

4.8.1  Refund if Vepco receives money back.

4.9.1  Language re tax gross up (in lieu of the last sentence in their
Section 7.3.)

5.1  Last sentence--add generator owner's schedules and output,etc. being
confidential.

In addition, there were a few things in the draft I wanted to point out, as
follows:

In Section 2.2.3 and elsewhere in the agreement, they reserve the right to
make a unilateral filing with FERC to amend the agreement.  The generator
owner would have the right to protest the filing, but I want to check with
our regulatory people as to whether they can waive this right, as I don't
think it's fair for them to unilaterally amend it.

Article 4.6 should be reviewed by technical folks.

In Section 10.2.1.3, they reserve the right to file the agreement with FERC
even if the parties haven't agreed and executed it yet and they start service
under the agreement.  As noted above, it's putting your fate in FERC's hands.

The indemnity of Vepco's employees and waiver of the protection of worker's
comp laws in Section 10.5.1 (and the reciprocal in 10.5.2) seemed strange to
me and I was wondering if you could run this past your risk management people.

I look forward to discussing this with you further.

 - 1155119.doc


Carter Phillips is going to have his partner, that noted litigator, the one
and only Phil Nowak, argue the case!  When you gonna be up here on Monday???
Let me know--I'll be at the office on Mon. PM.  df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/16/2001
03:34 PM ---------------------------

"John Wyss" <jwyss@wrf.com> on 02/16/2001 03:13:54 PM
To: "pdondanville" <pdondanville%schiffhardin.com%smtp@wrf.com>,
"djnightingale" <djnightingale%duke-energy.com%smtp@wrf.com>
cc: "dhill" <dhill%bspmlaw.com%smtp@wrf.com>, "Christopher Hardee"
<CHardee@WRF.com>, "Drew.Fossum" <Drew.Fossum%enron.com%smtp@wrf.com>

Subject: MHP  --  Bath  Cert Petition

Believe it or not, we just received a 25 page cert petition to the Supreme
Court filed by Bath Petroleum.  As you will recall, the Second Circuit's
decision was an unpublished per curiam order.  Even more remarkable is that
Carter  Phillips of Sidlley & Austin signed the petition as counsel of
record.

I will send a copy to Patty.  We can talk next week about our brief in
opposition.


Hi everyone - we are rescheduling this to Wednesday.

Sorry for the short notice, here are the topics the discussion will cover:

Texas General Land Office Prepay
Cannon Interests Prepay and Storage Hedge
Working Gas Inventory True Up
Lyondell/Citgo Issue


Rob, Andy Fastow is the only one who has not signed the DASH.  He may have a
few questions please give him a call.  Otherwise, Kay Chapman and/or Mark
Frank have the DASH.  I have signed.

Regards
Delainey


FYI....Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
08:59 AM ---------------------------

Rick Bergsieker@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/08/2000 09:22 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
cc: Rob Stewart/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: SADAF

You had asked for clarification regarding the status of our SADAF bid and how
the 501D turbine that Delaney wants may impact us.

Our bid, along with bids from others, are still under evaluation by SADAF.
We expect to learn about SADAF's decision through informal channels within
two weeks, but a formal announcement from SADAF will probably not be
forthcoming for another month or so. If we win the bid, we enter into PPA
negotiations that could take about six months to finish.  Until the PPA is
signed, we wouldn't know for certain that we had clinched the deal.

We were aware of Delaney's possible need for the turbine when we bid SADAF,
and thus we structured our bid in a manner that provides that we can proceed
with or without this specific turbine.

Ownership of this turbine would marginally strengthen our prospects.
However, I don't want to obstruct another Enron  affiliate if there is a
bonafide use for the turbine that adds to the Enron bottom line.

If Delaney has a firm "bird in the hand" he should take the turbine.
Conversely, if our deal firms up before Delaney has a firm use, I would want
to take the turbine.

My guess is that Delaney's deal will firm up before SADAF.

Rick


Jeff and I just talked and Jeff is going to go back to USGT and Astra and
negotiate a fix to the release issue--new drafts will be circulated.  DF

Jeffery Fawcett
02/07/2001 11:58 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Martha Cormier/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: For Approval- USGT, Astra Contracts

Attached are three (3) Agreements for your review and approval.  If approved,
please so indicate by replying to this email.

1. USGT (Amendment #6), extending term of 400,000 MMBtu/d, East - East to
03/31/01 with new pricing provisions.
2. USGT (Amendment #7), amends pricing for alternate flows during existing
contract term from $0.04 to $0.15/MMBtu.
2. Astra Power LLC, new contract for 50,000 MMBtu/d, East - East capacity
from 03/01/01 to 03/31/03.

USGT Amendment #6 has received both credit and capacity approval.
USGT Amendment #7 requires no capacity approval.  Credit will be notified of
change in rates.
Astra has received capacity approval, and is awaiting parental guarantee
letter in order to clear credit.


Noon works really well for me.
When did you make partner?

LC

"Joe Jong" <jmjong@hotmail.com> on 09/28/2000 10:41:30 AM
Please respond to "Joe Jong" <jmjong@hotmail.com>
To: <Larry.F.Campbell@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: BP

tentatively, we'll leave Houston at about noon and get back to Houston at
about 10. we're still finalizing the BP plans and we'll let you know ASAP.

Regards,

Joe Jong

Thomason, Moser, Patterson, & Jong L.L.P.
3040 Post Oak Blvd. # 1500
Houston, Texas 77056
(713) 623-4844
fax (713) 623-4846
www.tmpjlaw.com

**CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION**
This transmission contains information from the law firm of Thomason, Moser
& Patterson, L.L.P., which is confidential or privileged. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named on this
transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information
is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
notify us by telephone immediately so that we can arrange for the retrieval
of the original documents at no cost to you. Alternatively, notify the
sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without
disclosing it. Thank you.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Larry.F.Campbell@enron.com>
To: Joe Jong <jmjong@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: BP

>
> do you have specific time info for saturday's activities?
> i might be tied up in the morning.
>
> LC
>
>


Attached to this email is a zip compressed file
containing a report in MS Word format titled
"Analysis of Demands in ERCOT".  The purpose of
this document is to discuss the demands and
related data of the ERCOT system, such as the
trends, times, dates, days of the week, and load
factors.  This data will help provide input to
planning and operations analysis.

This report was prepared by Linda Shirey, Senior
Data Consultant, System Planning.  Her intiative
in opreparing this is greatly appreciated.

Kenneth A. Donohoo, PE
Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
ERCOT
2705 West Lake Dr.
Taylor, TX 76574-2136
(512)248-3003, FAX(512)248-3082

 - Analysis of Demands in ERCOT.zip


I bet your insurance is a 3 times higher than Calgary.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 8:22 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: FYI - Progress Report on testing an EES deal in Enpower

It was a BMW and they are paying me more than I paid in Calgary 3 years ago.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 8:02 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	RE: FYI - Progress Report on testing an EES deal in Enpower

Means broken and needs fixed - like your Mercedes.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 7:48 AM
To:	Belden, Tim
Cc:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: FYI - Progress Report on testing an EES deal in Enpower

I was still trying to figure out what "on the side of the road" meant.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Lavorato, John; Black, Don
Cc:	Herndon, Rogers; Richter, Jeff
Subject:	RE: FYI - Progress Report on testing an EES deal in Enpower

at our meeting with the six of us we need to assign one of us to wear the oversight of this project.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:09 PM
To:	Cross, Edith; Lavorato, John; Belden, Tim
Cc:	Herndon, Rogers; Richter, Jeff
Subject:	RE: FYI - Progress Report on testing an EES deal in Enpower

Looks like Enpower is "on the side of the road" with respect to capturing and valuing retail deals.   As we discussed in yesterday's meeting, Plan B is a more robust spreadsheet that unbundles the components and values them separately and creates postions by risk component.

I know this is easier said than done, but we need a tactical solution that gives the group confidence that value and positions are correct, rather than a bundled black box batch value with hard coded assumptions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cross, Edith
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:47 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Belden, Tim; Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Herndon, Rogers; Richter, Jeff
Subject:	FYI - Progress Report on testing an EES deal in Enpower

To all,

The following is documentation of a sample EES deal which was tested in the Enpower system.  This is for informational purposes only.  Please let me know if you have any questions, or need clarification on any points.

Over the last few weeks, a few of us have been working to test an EES deal in Enpower (St. Luke's - Roosevelt, part of the Beth Israel deal).  The deal is a fixed price sale in New York City (Zone J) of Energy, Line Losses, Ancillary's, and ICAP.  The T&D is a pass through.  We only tested one site out of the ten.  Needless to say, this is probably one of the simplest structures available.  Obviously, we have worked on a few other things at the same time, so it has taken longer than we expected, but I hope this will help highlight how difficult it is to book EES deals in Enpower in it's current state.

Quick statistics for ONE site:

Each month of hourly data, takes 5-6 minutes to save.  We booked 100 months (approx 8.3 years), therefore each deal type (energy, ancillary, etc.) took 8-9 hours to book.
Since each deal type takes 8-9 hours to book, it takes a total of 25-26 hours to book energy, ancillary's (only 1), line losses, and ICAP (this is not booked hourly, therefore, it only takes 1 hour to book).
Although we booked only one ancillary position, most markets have at least four, therefore the total booking time should be closer to 50 hours.
Once we got a book to run, it took 25 minutes to calculate the value.
All of the above statistics assume there are no errors in entering the deals.

Recommendations:

Work with Anthony Dayao to set up a system that can handle these trades for position management, valuation, reporting, scheduling, settlements, accounting, etc.
In the interim:

Enhance RPS to make the valuation consistent with the batch valuation process.  This includes strengthening information for position and DPR reporting.  As well, create tools to help identify change in valuation due to curve shift, reg switch options, and new deals.
Enhance Intramonth valuation and reporting (East desk does not currently have an intramonth book).
Integrate the Tariff Valuation and Reporting.  Currently, this is done in a stand-alone spreadsheet application.
Support the Curve Database project which will allow the breakdown of curves into its components (as opposed to current bundled curves).
Move all the EPMI hedges to Enpower.  All hedges will become desk to desk instead of being entered in both RPS and Enpower.  Position and P&L reports will have be integrated between Enpower and RPS.

Here is a breakdown of what it took to 'rebook' this trade:

Week 1 (May 14-18)

Read Contract.
Get Batch model, as well as a breakdown of value between Energy, Ancillary's, etc.
Sit with Underwriting to answer questions about Load growth and contractual questions.
Work on Wholesale Full Requirements model (in Excel) to check valuation.

Week 2 (May 21-25)

Continue working on Full Requirements model.
Work with Risk Management (Stacey White's group) to set up delivery points and curves in Enpower.
Begin to book deal in Enpower - Getting access to Enpower took some time.
Discovered that our assumption on hours for the 12x12 was incorrect.   We had gotten about 1/3 of the deal booked by the time we realized this.
At times, the database tables would run out of space, because we have never entered a deal of this size in the test database.  This would keep us from entering any new data.

Week 3 (May 29-June 1)

Finished Excel Full Requirements model.  The EES Batch and the Wholesale model tie out except for some minor differences on discounting and ICAP.  The current ICAP curves are            $/MW-day, and they are not calculated using the correct numbers of days (i.e. June and July have the same MW/day price, even though there are 30 and 31 days, respectively, in each month).  This can be fixed in the curve files.  In the future we should mark the curves as $/Kw-month.
Again, we ran into problems with the test database.
Completed booking in Enpower.

Week 4 (June 4-5)

Took 2 days to get a MTM valuation (portcalc) to work.
Discovered deal entry errors in booking.


----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001 12:23 PM -----

   Health Tips and News
   The Straight Dope On Food, Health, & Exercise:

   Q:  I've heard that cardiovascular exercise can prolong life. Is this
 true?
   A:  Your heart is only good for so many beats, and that's it. Everything
 wears out eventually. Speeding up your heart will not make you live
 longer; that's like saying you can extend the life of your car by driving it
 faster.  Want to live longer? Take a nap.

   Q:  Should I cut down on meat and eat more fruits and vegetables?
   A:  You must grasp logistical efficiencies. What does a cow eat? Hay and
  corn. And what are these? Vegetables. So a steak is nothing more than an
  efficient mechanism of delivering vegetables to your system. Need grain?
  Eat chicken. Beef is also a good source of field grass (green leafy
  vegetable). And a pork chop can give you 100% of your recommended daily
  allowance of vegetable slop.

   Q: Is beer or wine bad for me?
   A: Look, it goes to the earlier point about fruits and vegetables. As we
  all know, scientists divide everything in the world into three categories:
  animal, mineral, and vegetable. We all know that beer and wine are not
  animal, and they are not on the periodic table of elements, so that only
  leaves one thing, right? My advice: Have a burger and a beer and enjoy
 your liquid vegetables.

   Q: How can I calculate my body/fat ratio?
   A: Well, if you have a body, and you have body fat, your ratio is one to
  one. If you have two bodies, your ratio is two to one, etc.

    Q: At the gym, a guy asked me to "spot" for him while he did the bench
  press. What did he mean?
   A: "Spotting" for someone means you stand over him while he blows air up
  your shorts. It's an accepted practice at health clubs; though if you find
  that it becomes the ONLY reason why you're going in, you probably ought to
  reevaluate your exercise program.

   Q: What are some of the advantages of participating in a regular exercise
  program?
   A: Can't think of a single one, sorry.  My philosophy is: No Pain-No
 Pain.

   Q: If I stop drinking, will I live longer?
   A: Nope. Drinking enhances individual expression and peace of mind. If
  you stop, you'll probably stress yourself to death in record time.

   Q: Aren't fried foods bad for you?
   A: You're not listening. Foods are fried these days in vegetable oil. In
  fact, they're permeated in it. How could getting more vegetables be bad for
  you?

   Q: What's the secret to healthy eating?
   A: Thicker gravy.

   Q: Will sit-ups help prevent me from getting a little soft around the
  middle?
   A: Definitely not! When you exercise a muscle, it gets bigger. You should
  only be doing sit-ups if you want a bigger stomach.

  I hope this has cleared up any misconceptions you may have had.


Ronnie,

regarding the parking situation downtown
The closest parking garage with visitor parking is the one at Allens Center.

your agenda, to define
- what the scope of the project is
- what do you expect of the project -- in other words what are you trying to
find out from the study, this will help define the scope
-discuss a timeline
-tools that we can use at Enron
-are there any projects at Enron (past or present) that we can draw on or
build on

sounds good.  Do you all have the original scope Vince wrote up?  Although it
is broad, its a good beginning for your scope.  Once you flesh-out the scope,
we'll see if any existing reports can be found that may be helpful.

regarding industry research

check out red herring and other online resources.

see you later

ken


Attached herewith is the filed Conference Report statutory and report
language for the Department of Defense Reauthorization.  Today, at 5:00 p.m.
EST, The House Rules Committee will meet to formulate a rule on H.R. 4205,
The Floyd Spence National Defense Authorization Act for FY2001--Conference
Report .  The plan is to then vote on both the Rule and the Conference Report
on the House floor tomorrow, October 11th.  The Senate also plans
consideration this week, but they have not yet announced their exact date for
floor consideration (and they are still seeking resolution of the price cap
concerns which could result in a possible filibuster.)

The Conference statutory language and report language is a victory for Enron
Federal Solutions which had been threatened with House language which would
have required a sole source by the local franchise utility.  The House
receded to the Senate language (translation:  the Hefley language was
killed.)  Further, the political compromise reached does not support state
franchise rights; nor does it challenge Federal sovereignty; nor does it
challenge bundling; but it does affirm the competitive rights for non-utility
bidders.

Given the resources employed by EEI and their member companies plus employed
by APPA, NRECA and NARUC, this is a major victory for EFS and the DOD.  By
close of business today, we need to determine whether or not to proceed with
a possible floor Colloquy.

Congratulations to all involved with this successful team effort!

SEC. 2813. CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY REGARDING UTILITY SYSTEMS OF
          MILITARY DEPARTMENTS.

     (a) Selection of Conveyee.--Subsection (b) of section 2688 of title
  10, United States Code, is amended--
     (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``If more than one''; and

     (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

     ``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned may use
  procedures other than competitive procedures, but only in accordance
  with subsections (c) through (f) of section 2304 of this title, to
  select the conveyee of a utility system (or part of a utility system)
  under subsection (a).
     ``(3) With respect to the solicitation process used in connection
  with the conveyance of a utility system (or part of a utility system)
  under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall ensure that the
  process is conducted in a manner consistent with the laws and
  regulations of the State in which the utility system is located to the
  extent necessary to ensure that all interested regulated and unregulated
  utility companies and other interested entities receive an opportunity
  to acquire and operate the utility system to be conveyed.''.
     (b) Applicability of Regulatory Requirements.--Subsection (f) of such
  section is amended--
     (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``The Secretary''; and

     (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

     ``(2) The Secretary concerned shall require in any contract for the
  conveyance of a utility system (or part of a utility system) under
  subsection (a) that the conveyee manage and operate the utility system
  in a manner consistent with applicable Federal and State regulations
  pertaining to health, safety, fire, and environmental requirements.''.

                      Conveyance authority regarding utility systems of
military

           departments (sec. 2813)

       The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would amend
   section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, to require the secretary
   concerned to comply with the competition requirements of section 2304 of
   title 10, United States Code, in the conveyance of utility system
   infrastructure. The provision would also require that the secretary
   concerned carry out a conveyance or award only if he determines that the
   conveyance or award complies with State laws, regulations, rulings, and
   policies governing the provision of utility systems.
       The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would
   amend section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify that the
   secretary concerned may use procedures other than competitive procedures
   only under the circumstances specified in section 2304 (c) through (f)
   of title 10, United States Code.
       The House recedes with an amendment that would require the secretary
   concerned to structure the solicitation process for the privatization of
   utility systems on military installations in such a manner that would
   allow, to the maximum extent possible, all interested regulated and
   unregulated entities the opportunity to acquire and operate utility
   systems on military installations regardless of franchise rights in the
   area of the installation concerned. The amendment would also direct the
   secretary concerned to require the conveyee or awardee of the utility
   system to manage and operate the utility system consistent with federal
   and state regulations pertaining to health safety, fire, and
   environmental requirements.


That Paul has a cloud over him.  At least he has time to heal before baseball
season.

We are planning on spending Saturday night.  Neil and I will stay at the B &
B.

Enjoy this great weather.  I hear more rain is forecast for the weekend -
hope they are wrong!

Love,

Kay

Bill and Rita McCall <bmccall@wcnet.net> on 11/20/2000 12:24:37 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Palacios P.S.

I forgot to tell you Paul was in a wreck Saturday afternoon late. He is
O.K. except for a broken arm. He was with the Mayor of Palacios and his
grandson. They were on the way to the high school and someone pulled out
intothem. Mother


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 07:50 AM -----

	Christie Patrick@ECT
	03/15/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Alice Weekley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Jordan
Hunter/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Veatch/Enron@EnronXGate, Frank S
Wang/Corp/Enron@Enron, ricardo_n_calvo@urscorp, roger_w_gunther@ursc
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lauren Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Calypso Tribal Letters

Friends,

The statute should be reviewed by whichever lawyer is supporting the project.

 As I mentioned to Alice Weekley, I am unfamiliar with the recent amendments
referenced requiring the notice for projects that do not actually cross
reservation property. The amendment does not surprise me though.

 In the past, for example, during the Transwestern expansion in '91, we
developed a comprehensive NAGPRA plan with tribes whose reservations we
crossed, yet neighboring tribes were included--the thinking by the various
State Historic Preservation officers was that unearthed remains (bones,
funerial objects, pottery pieces, holy objects, etc) may have belonged to
tribes other than those from whose reservation they were ultimately
unearthed.  It made for a VERY VERY long and complicated plan and
consultation process....not only when objects were unearthed, but simply
putting the required anticipatory plan and procedures in place PRIOR to
construction.  (It gives me a chuckle: my late husband, Leonard Hilton, who
was in charge of the TW project, is likely rolling in his own grave at the
mere thought of Enron having to put another of these plans
together..Haha!!)   As I said, I've not read the amendment , but hopefully it
only legally requires 'notice'---yet, in my nearly 20 years of practicing
law, I've rarely seen  a 'notice' that didn't crack the door or sound the
alarm of further buerocratic opportunity!

For your further information, I have met Billie Ray Cypress personally and
he's a decent and seemingly reasonable guy with a huge casino on the rez ;
yet these personal attributes frequently go by the wayside when it comes to
'perceived economic opportunity'.
 Chief James Billie,[chief of the Seminoles, 2nd largest/2nd wealthiest tribe
in North America] on the other hand, is shrewd in business, dictitorial in
management, and personally , has an ego bigger than Texas, behavior to match,
and is proud of it!! --which makes him a ton of fun to be with if he likes
you--he wrestles alligators, writes rock and roll and "plays"in whatever
stage opportunity is presented him--as long as he can be the center of
attention.  The Seminoles have not only a tribal web site, James Billie has
his own!!  Check it out--it's a hoot!!  He has been chief for about 25 years
(and I'm guessing he's maybe in his early 50's).  The Seminoles have
recognized significant economic development under James, but he is definitely
a "My way or the highway" kind of guy--he loves you, hates you, or ignores
you--and he has a tribal council that is respectfully terrified of him. If
any activity smacks of anything James Billie doesn't like, he'll know no
limits in stopping it...remember, this guy wrestles alligators!! No Joke!

I don't recognize the other names on the list, but I think it's clear from
both the beurocratic issues, as well as the specific tribal issues incident
to each affected tribe, everything associated with the process should be
executed with all of this in mind.  I'd be happy to speak with the project's
lawyer to discuss this further, if information beyond that set forth above
would be helpful.

Thanks!

--Christie.

----- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 08:53 AM -----

	roger_w_gunther@urscorp.com
	03/15/2001 08:32 AM

		 To: alice.weekley@enron.com
		 cc: jordan.hunter@enron.com, stephen.veatch@enron.com,
frank_s_wang@enron.com, christie.patrick@enron.com,
ricardo_n_calvo@urscorp.com
		 Subject: Calypso Tribal Letters

Alice:

Janus Research sent the enclosed letters to me;  I understand that they
have been modified per your discussions with them.  Also enclosed is a
summary document outlining recent revisions to Section 106 (National
Historic Preservation Act).

Regards,

Roger

(See attached file: Section 106 regs (1).doc)(See attached file: Fred
McGhee 3-7-01.doc)(See attached file: James Billie 3-7-01.doc)(See attached
file: Jerry Haney 3-7-01.doc)(See attached file: R. Perry Beaver
2-7-01.doc)(See attached file: Billie Cypress 3-7-01.doc)
 - Section 106 regs (1).doc
 - Fred McGhee 3-7-01.doc
 - James Billie 3-7-01.doc
 - Jerry Haney 3-7-01.doc
 - R. Perry Beaver 2-7-01.doc
 - Billie Cypress 3-7-01.doc


Attached please find a proposal by John Morris to prepare an economic
analysis of pipeline affiliate concentration into specific geographic
destination markets vis-a-vis non-affiliates.? I would like to discuss this
proposal with our group on Thursday afternoon (2:00 est).? I will forward on
call-in instructions tomorrow.? Please be aware that this proposal is
privileged and confidential and was prepared as attorney-client work
product.?? Mr. Morris' information is set forth below.? It may be valuable to
ask Mr. Morris to join us for the conference call in order to answer your
questions.

-
John R. Morris
Vice President
Economists Incorporated
1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
Suite 400
Washington, DC? 20036
Voice: 202.223.4700
Fax:?? 202.296.7138

?
 - INGAA Proposal.doc
 - ATT00512.txt


John,

Did you put Frank Hayden up to this?  If this decision is up to me I would
consider authorizing Mike G., Frank E., Keith H. and myself to trade west
power.  What do you think?

Phillip
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
10:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Frank Hayden/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/05/2001 09:27 AM CST
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Cross Commodity

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hayden, Frank
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 7:01 PM
To: Presto, Kevin; Zufferli, John; McKay, Jonathan; Belden, Tim; Shively,
Hunter; Neal, Scott; Martin, Thomas; Allen, Phillip; Arnold, John
Subject: Cross Commodity
Importance: High

I,ve been asked to provide an updated list on who is authorized to cross
trade what commodities/products.  As soon as possible, please reply to this
email with the names of only the authorized &cross commodity8 traders and
their respective commodities. (natural gas, crude, heat, gasoline, weather,
precip, coal, power, forex (list currency), etc..)

Thanks,

Frank

PS. Traders limited to one commodity do not need to be included on this list.


I suggest the attached language be substituted for the current language in
the schedules in respect of Engineering Report where  a PV/PDP mac is
utilized.  Tana, maybe this could go as an optional insert under Docs to be
Delivered, rather than back in the collateral schedule with the pv/pdp
language, so people won't forget to put it in under required deliveries.
Thanks.  Mary


I was told you may be the person to help me.   I am a trader on the East gas
desk working for Scott Neal.  When I was originally set up to operate on EOL
I  was set up with many more products than I needed.  I am having problems
with my system being very slow and the suggestion was made to delete
everything from All Products in stack manager but US Gas.  Are you the person
who can help me accomplish this?  All other attempts to speed up the editing
process have been unsuccessful.  Even if this does not help improve the time
it takes to change a price I would still like to delete these product options
because it takes me to long to find my products each day.

               Thank You!


Janel & Co.:
This is a group that we should try to tie into our PR efforts.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/12/2001 10:34 AM -----

	"Carl Guardino" <cguardino@svmg.org>
	03/08/2001 07:01 PM
	Please respond to cguardino

		 To: "cguardino@svmg. org" <cguardino@svmg.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Energy Positions Taken

Dear SVMG Members:

As you may know, the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group Board of Directors
met this morning and voted to support two Energy proposals: The Los Esteros
Transmission Facility and the Metcalf Energy Center.

Please find below the news release on SVMG's position, and an attachment
that reviews SVMG's criteria and evaluation for both projects.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Carl Guardino

Local proposals part of a comprehensive platform to meet energy needs of
Silicon Valley working families and economy

For Immediate Release:         Contact: Michelle Montague-Bruno
March 8, 2001             (408) 501-7853

This morning the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group Board of Directors voted
in support of the proposed Metcalf Energy Center and the Los Esteros
Transmission Project to help meet Silicon Valley's need for reliable energy.
Completing a thoughtful and deliberative process the SVMG board of directors
voted to support the generating facility, which would offer 580 megawatts of
new power supply to Silicon Valley and provide enough power to service
approximately 580,000 households.  Additionally, the Los Esteros
Transmission Project, proposed for north San Jose, provides another 800
megawatts of new transmission capacity that will help bring power into the
region - an issue that caused blackouts here on June 14, 2000.
"The Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group has always been a very analytical
organization," said Dr. James Woody, president & CEO of Roche
Pharmaceuticals and chairman of the board of SVMG.  "With the energy
infrastructure projects we developed an analytical process, and a systematic
review of the Metcalf and Los Esteros proposals, recommending approval after
thoughtful consideration."
This deliberative process included the development of criteria (see
attachment) utilized by five separate working bodies in the organization
(three SVMG committees, its Working Council and the Board of Directors) to
evaluate the projects and determine a position.  The organization does not
support these two facilities as an exclusive means to fulfilling the energy
needs of Silicon Valley families and employers, and believes our energy
challenge requires the individual efforts of every Californian.
"The Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group board completed a very thoughtful
and deliberative process that supports the generation and transmission of
power in our back yard," said Carl Guardino, president & CEO of the Silicon
Valley Manufacturing Group.  "The criteria are a prism through which the
organization assesses energy infrastructure proposals.  It was agreed that
the Metcalf and Los Esteros projects would provide much needed energy to
support working families, and the economy of Silicon Valley."
Attached are the criteria utilized by the SVMG Energy Committee, SVMG Land
Use Committee, SVMG Environment Committee, SVMG Working Council and the SVMG
Board of Directors to review the energy projects.
Solving California's energy challenges is going to require steps beyond the
development of the Metcalf and Los Esteros facilities, and must include
additional generation and transmission projects throughout the region and
state.  However, an immediate solution to help get us through the summer and
beyond is for more energy conservation at the office and at home.  The
E-Energy Conservation Campaign ('E' stands for email), launched on February
7, between SVMG and Governor Davis' cabinet secretary for technology, trade
and commerce, Lon Hatamiya, is reaching out to more than four million public
and private employees to provide tips on ways to conserve power and save
money at home and at the office.  For more information on the E-Energy
Conservation Campaign, visit the SVMG Web site at www.svmg.org, and click on
the icon for the campaign.

Expressing the need for a diverse portfolio of solutions in addressing the
energy crisis, Carl Guardino will discuss everything from conservation to
generation at the upcoming Energy Summit on March 16, and co-sponsored by
San Jose Mayor Ron Gonzales, the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors and
the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group.
"I am proud and honored to stand with Mayor Gonzales and Supervisor Jim
Beall to co-chair an event that will look for regional solutions to help
solve the issue," said Guardino. "We support the mayor's plan for
alleviating our energy problems, and believe that a comprehensive approach
must be implemented to survive this crisis.  No matter how one feels about
specific energy projects, there is no single solution, and we need a menu of
options, including conservation, co-generation, onsite generation,
transmission and major generating facilities."
Attachment:  SVMG criteria to review generation and transmission proposals,
and how the Metcalf Energy Center and the Los Esteros Transmission project
weigh up to those criteria.

 - criteria MEC & Los esteros.doc


You are enrolled in the following class:

Electric Business Understanding

Class Days and Times:
  11/16/99  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
EB552,  Houston
No Show/Participant Fee: $500.00
Note: If available, please bring a financial calculator with you.

Please review any prerequisite material to validate your eligibility in this
class.

 We look forward to seeing you at 08:00:00 AM on 11/16/99.  If you have any
questions, please call the ECT Development Center Team at 853-0357.

Thank you.


Well, we met and had dinner last night.  NOTHING of importance was discussed
during our entire meal and it was only when I brought things up as we were
leaving that any actual talking occurred.  Here are the basics...

- There is definitely no "us" anymore...and I quote "sometimes these things
just fade out"
- There is much I didn't know about him and I am sure even more that I still
don't
- Case in point...He was MARRIED before (yes, you read correctly married)
- Turns out he's been divorced about three years, it didn't end well and he
hasn't had a relationship that has lasted beyond       2 mos. in those three
years (even though, by his own admission, he has dated a lot) - Can you say
issues?
- He told me "I know this sounds so trite, but this really has nothing to do
with you, it's all me."  Of course I agreed with him saying "I know it's you
Ted, I don't have any problems." (He got a chuckle out of that one)
- I told him about my frustrations and disappointment with how he had handled
things and he apologised (evidently Kevin told him about our exchange at
Steak Night) and I also let him know how much I appreciated his handling of
things in the beginning
- I said I really hated animosity and hard feelings and that as long as he
hadn't done anything truly horrible to me (i.e. murder a family member, etc.)
I would really like to leave things on a good note...He agreed.
- He said I was a fantastic girl and that he still enjoyed hanging out and
talking with me (although I don't see us doing a lot of that)

So all in all I walked away with three very important things 1. A lightened
load (I got everything of my chest that I wanted to and needed to) 2. My
dignity (I handled it just as I'd hoped...with composure and wit) 3. A
clearer since of Ted as a person (He definitely has a lot of issues in his
life he has not completely dealt with yet, and who knows if he ever will?)

Anyway, I'm okay with everything and surprisingly feel pretty good.  I'll
talk to you soon.

Susan

By the way, I told him about the shirt idea (he thought it was funny, and
maybe just a little harsh)


Thanks.

ckm


Pretty nice.  I had never even heard of this vehicle.

DG

Greg Couch
12/12/2000 01:56 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Lay's car

Found this on a web site.

The Gelaendewagen or "G-wagen" is something of a Land Rover on steroids with
German engineering.
Think of a cross between an S500 sedan and the Hummer. At $135,000 a copy and
with only a handful being
imported into the US, those lucky enough to get their hands on a G-Wagen are
assured exclusivity and an
all-terrain vehicle that means business.


Mike Driscoll just talked with the broker, and they agreed to the price Enron
has - broker will change the checkout sheet now. Sorry for the confusion.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/12/2001 11:10 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: STATUS- Re: 2/8/01 Errors

deal 517877 is a SELL for Q2 at COB AT $313............THIS DEAL HAS BEEN
CLEARED.
deal 517876 is a BUY for Q2 at MID-C AT 300.

Here is the amerex checkout for Mike Swerzbin with the deals he traded on
2/8/01.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/12/2001 12:43 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: STATUS- Re: 2/8/01 Errors

Mike still has not returned my calls, and is not at work today. I checked
with Mike Driscoll, Swerzbin's assistant, and he confirmed that 517876 should
be $300. It's an EES spread, and the other side (deal #517877)  is $313 - is
that what Amerex is looking for? He also checked into 517891 and found that
the delivery point should be SP-15. It's been changed.

Let me know if there are further questions.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/12/2001 06:55 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: STATUS- Re: 2/8/01 Errors

What's the status of these two deals?

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 02/12/2001
08:56 AM ---------------------------

Evelyn Metoyer
02/09/2001 02:05 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 2/8/01 Errors

Hi Kate,

for ref 517891 the delivery point still shows as PV.........it should be SP-15
for ref 517876 the price stll shows $300....it should be $313

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/08/2001 05:29 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2/8/01 Errors

517384 - price has been changed to $260
517891 - mike's book shows Palo delivery - desk was wrong - has been changed
to LTNW
517884 - price has been changed to $300
517876/877 - missing Amerex deals were under wrong desk (STCA) - have been
changed to LTNW

Also, I entered many of Mike's deals today, but in my rush forgot to re-set
my Deal Blotter defaults - so the deals went in under Short Term California
instead of Long Term Northwest. I've changed them all to the correct desk,
which should clear up the missing deals, and hopefully will make more sense
for your checkouts. Sorry about the confusion - entering deals for three
different desks at once gets a little hectic!

Let me know if you have questions.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/08/2001 03:11 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2/8/01 Errors

Mike Swerzbin
deal 517384
Prebon shows price as $260.......Enpower has $250

Mike Swerzbin
deal 517891
Amerex shows delivery as SP-15...Enpower has PV

Mike Swerzbin
deal 517884
Amerex shows price as $300...Enpower has $200

 Mike Swerzbin
I am missing the following deal per Amerex:
Buys from EES Q2'01 Mid-C 25 mw at $313 peak hrs.


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Morning Market View(TM) for Thursday, July 19, 2001
as of 11:00AM EDT
Information provided by Standard & Poor's

================================================================

U.S. INDICES
(11:00 a.m. EDT)

----------------------------------
Market            Value     Change

DJIA          10,659.50    + 89.70
Nasdaq Comp.   2,065.67    + 49.50
S&P 500        1,221.17    + 13.46
----------------------------------
NYSE Advancing Issues        1,685
NYSE Declining Issues          964
NYSE Trading Volume        373 mln
NASDAQ Advancing Issues      1,984
NASDAQ Declining Issues        988
NASDAQ Trading Volume      545 mln

==================================

U.S. TREASURIES
----------------------------------
Value             Yield     Change

1-year bill       3.43%        n/a
5-year note       4.64%     - 4/32
10-year note      5.11%     - 5/32
30-year bond      5.52%     - 3/32

The tables above look best when viewed in a fixed-width font,
such as "Courier."

================================================================

U.S. TRADING SUMMARY

After yesterday's sell-off, the major averages all moved higher
from the open as a number of encouraging corporate outlooks
lured back the buyers. Technology shares have been the largest
beneficiaries of buyer interest today, as a host of encouraging
earnings announcements from U.S. firms and cell-phone maker
Nokia helped offset concerns over IBM's somewhat pessimistic
outlook. Technology investors had further reason to cheer when
Dell Computer reaffirmed its earnings outlook this morning. Not
surprisingly, the NASDAQ has been the largest beneficiary of the
tech buying, jumping 2.5%. The S&P 500 rose more than 1% on
strength in semiconductors, communication and computer
software/systems. The Dow has gains just shy of 1%, led higher
by shares of United Tech, Microsoft and GE.

----------------------------------------------------------------

JAPAN / EUROPE SUMMARY

European stocks were mostly higher in midafternoon European
trading as a positive earnings report from cell-phone maker
Nokia and encouraging results from SAP, the largest European
software producer based in Germany, provided support. The German
Dax has powered 1.0% higher, while the French CAC-40 rose 0.7%.
The London FTSE is holding around unchanged levels, restrained
by weakness in shares of British Telecom and Vodafone.
Elsewhere, the Japanese market was weaker overall, with banking
shares falling sharply on increasingly negative sentiment.
Indications from U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan
that the U.S. economy could weaken further set a gloomy tone.
The Topix index finished lower by 0.4% and ended the session at
its lowest level since March 15. The Nikkei 225, heavily
weighted in technology shares, managed to finish 0.1% higher.

----------------------------------------------------------------

CURRENCY SUMMARY

The U.S. dollar has found some relief after yesterday's drubbing
that came on Greenspan's testimony and perceptions that the U.S.
would abandon its strong-dollar policy. The dollar has found
some comfort versus the euro, strengthening to around the 0.870
dollar per euro level after trading as low as 0.878 dollars per
euro overnight. However, the greenback has had a more difficult
time versus the yen, slipping further to around the 123.5 yen
level after trading just above the 124 yen level overnight.
Recall that the dollar was trading around 125.5 yen and 0.850
dollars per euro as recently as Tuesday.

----------------------------------------------------------------

MAJOR COMPANY / INDUSTRY NEWS
(All prices as of 11:05 a.m. EDT)

** IBM (IBM: 104.68, + 0.40) reported earnings for its second
quarter in line with Wall Street expectations on slightly
slowing sales that were below expectations. Earnings totaled
$2.1 billion, or $1.15 per share, versus $1.9 billion, or $1.06
per share, in the same quarter last year. Revenues, at $21.6
billion, were about $1 billion below what Wall Street had
expected. But while results in the current quarter were roughly
in line with estimates, IBM was somewhat cautious over future
prospects. The firm stated that a number of problems could
impact their bottom line, including the negative effects of a
strong U.S. dollar, weakness in some business lines and
investment losses. IBM is the world's largest computer hardware
supplier, a leading software supplier and has the world's
largest technology services businesses.

** Satellite TV firm Echostar (DISH: 30.54, + 0.57) handily beat
Wall Street estimates, reporting a second-quarter profit when
analysts expected the company to lose money during the quarter.
Instead, the second-largest satellite TV provider earned $2.3
million, or nil on a per share basis, versus Wall Street
expectations that the company would lose $0.10 per share. Sales
rose about 50% to about $966 million. The unexpectedly good news
came as a result of a jump in the number of subscribers, which
grew 6% to 6.1 million customers.

** Lawsuit-plagued Philip Morris (MO: 46.13, + 0.65) reported
fiscal second-quarter earnings that matched Wall Street
estimates. The maker of Marlboro cigarettes and Miller beer
earned $2.3 billion, or $1.03 per share, versus $2.2 billion, or
$0.95 per share, in the same quarter last year. Revenues rose
11% to $23.2 billion over last year's quarter as the firm hiked
cigarette prices.

** A host of large technology firms reported corporate results
last night. Siebel Systems (SEBL: 36.17, - 1.47) beat estimates
when it reported earning $0.15 per share versus $0.10 per share
a year ago. Analysts had expected earnings of $0.13 per share.
Elsewhere, Applied Micro Circuits (AMCC: 18.17, + 1.17) reported
a first-quarter loss, excluding charges, of $13.6 million or
$0.05 per share. The company expects to cut 5% of its work force
and take an $8 million to $11 million charge against earnings
for the cutback. Broadcom (BRCM: 44.28, + 5.28) reported a sharp
drop in second-quarter profits, but joined Applied Micro
Circuits in saying it expects sales to possibly rebound toward
the end of this year.

----------------------------------------------------------------

ECONOMIC NEWS

** U.S. trade balance for May came in at a $28.3 billion
deficit, less than the previous $32.0 billion deficit and below
the S&P consensus estimate of a $32.0 billion deficit.

** Weekly initial jobless claims came in at 414K, less than the
previous week's 449K and below the consensus estimate of 425K.

** Leading economic indicators for June rose 0.3%, slightly
below the previous month's 0.4% increase and matching the
consensus estimate.

** Philadelphia Federal Reserve manufacturing index for July due
out at 12:00 p.m. EDT.

** FRIDAY - U.S. Treasury budget for June.

################################################################

Log in using the links below to:

Access your account:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=CCBodyi&NeedCASelValue=Y

View your Email Alert customization options:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Perform research or request a market quote:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=Quotes

Place a trade order:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=TradeStock

To visit Schwab's home page, use this link:
http://www.schwab.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Now you can receive graphics Email Alerts in HTML format, using
helpful, full-color graphics and active Web links that connect
you directly to information you want. Use the link below to log
in and change your email format preference:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAEditEmailAddr

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by
Schwab personnel. (1000-8752)

Copyright 2001 Standard & Poor's MMS Inc.  All rights reserved.
Standard & Poor's MMS services are for personal use only.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, print or
electronic, is prohibited.
Distribution by Quris, Inc.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000
04:39 PM ---------------------------

"SOCORRO HERNANDEZ" <SUHERNAN@LLGM.COM> on 09/07/2000 03:27:26 PM
To: <Judy.Hernandez@enron.com>, <irenepepe@hotmail.com>, "CATHERINE BROWN"
<CLBROWN@LLGM.COM>, "VIVIAN FARRELL" <VFARRELL@LLGM.COM>,
<bandama@ssa.co.orange.ca.us>, <maryloulou@yahoo.com>
cc:
Subject: BLONDES...CANNOT EXPLAIN THEM

<<
>
>
>                          BLONDES....CANNOT EXPLAIN THEM
>
>One morning, a blonde called her boyfriend and said, "Please come over and
help me. I have this awesome jigsaw puzzle, and I can't figure out how to
start it."
>
>Her boyfriend asked, "What is it a puzzle of?"
>
>The blonde said,"From the picture on the box, it's a tiger."
>
The blonde's boyfriend figures that he's pretty good at puzzles, so he heads
over to her place. She lets him in the door and shows him where she has the
puzzle spread all over the table. He studies the pieces for a moment, then he
studies the box.
>
>He then turns to her and says, "First, no matter what I do, I'm not going to
>be able to show you how to assemble these pieces to look like the picture
>of that tiger."
>
>"Second, I'd advise you to relax, have a cup of coffee, and put all these
>Frosted Flakes back in the box.


Before you leave today or first thing in the morning, please advise Bradford, Rohauer and Kitchen by email of the status of the particular master netting agreements on which you are working.  Barbara Gray is coordinating the release of the gas receivable financing so that we can execute the netting agreements and she will advise as and when finalized.  As previously noted today, the power receivable financing will be released as we sign the netting agreements on a counterparty-by-counterparty basis.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Every day?

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 03:51 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Off-Peak

Kay-

According to the control room guys, "off peak" is defined as hour ending 2300
to hour ending 0600.  They indicate that this is a NERC standard.


David,  Attached is the agreement with the revisions we discussed.  Please
review.  I tried to redline againt the previous version, but any section that
I modified displayed as an entire rewrite of the section.  Maybe you will
have better luck redlining.  Please call with any questions.  X 33512.


Debra & Dan -

I just spoke to Craig Breslau, who asked me to send the Master Physical email
directly to the counterparty, with a copy to him.  So, would you please email
the counterparty contacts, with copies to Craig and to me.

The counterparty contacts are:

Mr. David Lin
Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A.
dlin@fpcusa.com

Mr. Larry Karl
Neumin Production Company
larrykarl@ftpc.fpcusa.com

Thanks again,

Jay


Ivonne,

Thanks for the information.  Will I receive the $3,500 automatically on my
paycheck, or do I need to submit an expense report to be reimbursed for any
expenses I incur?  If I do need to submit an expense report, who should I
turn it in to?

Thanks,
Robin

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ivonne Brown @ ENRON                           02/23/2001 08:56 AM

To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Relocation to Chicago

Robin,

You will be receiving a cost-of-living adjustment of 20% when you relocate to
Chicago plus an additional $1,000 per month.  In addition, we will provide
relocation assistance for your household goods and car transportation.

Allowance
$3,500 will cover expenses which are outside the movement of your household
goods.  (This amount is before taxes.)

Household goods move
Option 1 - Full service of household goods
Option 2 - Self move / $1,500  (This amount is before taxes.)

Please let me know if you need additional information.

Thanks,
Ivonne Brown


Is this something one of your people should look at?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
03/19/99 02:37 PM ---------------------------
From: Brent Hendry AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 02/19/99 04:43 PM
To: Julio Casillas@ECT, "Andrea Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT
ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, Sue Frusco AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
cc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor@ECT
Subject: Draft Template

This is a rough draft of a new form of supply agreement for electricity that
I sent to a potential supplier, Central Termica Alto Valle S.A. for their
comments.  The Termination section is still under review.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
19/02/99 04:40 PM ---------------------------

Brent Hendry
19/02/99 07:22 PM

To:   zolezzim@dmasa.com.ar
cc:   Julian Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Neal/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:  Draft Template

At the request of Scott Neal please find attached a draft Output Marketing
form for your review.

(See attached file: OUTPUTen3.doc)

 - OUTPUTen3.doc


Bring him in

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
09:40 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           01/26/2001 09:25 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Possible position in Risk

Chris is an internal candidate.  What do you think?

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
09:24 AM ---------------------------

Chris Riegler@ENRON
01/22/2001 08:30 AM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Possible position in Risk

David,
     I am forwarding you my resume regarding a conversation that I had with
Steve Venturatos.  I would be extremely interested in any position that you
might have available in your Risk group.  I have been with Enron for the past
year, working in the regulatory branch of HPL.  I appreciate your time and
look forward to hearing back from you.

Chris Riegler
Ext. 31925
2197b


just b/c you aren't in the top ten doesn't mean that you don't have pretty
girls - there are always a few good apples in a rotten bunch

From:  Bryan Hull
12/06/2000 09:39 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Top 10 Colleges with the Best Looking Girls

Then why are you dating a girl from LSU?


fyi

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 01:40 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Becky Young @ ENRON                           06/30/2000 01:06 PM

To: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly
Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter F
Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Wood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Josephine Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L
Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farzad
Farhangnia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles T
Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eva Pao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher
J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Kinsey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margie
Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reyna Cabrera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barry Steinhart/Corp/Enron@Enron, Danny Conner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd
Richardson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike
Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill
Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Troy Black/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nelson
Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Russell Dyk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darren Espey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth
Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wes Dempsey/NA/Enron@Enron, Cora
Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barry Steinhart/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PIRA Natural Gas Briefing

Due to scheduling conflicts, this briefing will be rescheduled at a later
date.  Sorry for any inconvenience this might have caused.
---------------------- Forwarded by Becky Young/NA/Enron on 06/30/2000 01:01
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Becky Young                           06/30/2000 12:41 PM

To: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly
Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter F
Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Wood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Josephine Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L
Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farzad
Farhangnia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles T
Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eva Pao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher
J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Kinsey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margie
Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reyna Cabrera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barry Steinhart/Corp/Enron@Enron, Danny Conner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd
Richardson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike
Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill
Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Troy Black/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nelson
Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Russell Dyk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Grass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darren Espey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth
Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wes Dempsey/NA/Enron@Enron, Cora
Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barry Steinhart/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: PIRA Natural Gas Briefing

PIRA representative, Greg Shuttlesworth will be at Enron on Thursday, July 27
from 3:00pm - 4:30 pm in EB30C1 to give a natural gas briefing.  This
briefing is included in the current consultant relationship between PIRA and
ENA.  Please respond to me if you plan to be in attendance for this
briefing.

Thanks,
Becky Young
x30622


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/14/99 09:03 AM
---------------------------

Karen Lambert
12/13/99 09:23 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Matrix Update -- PA Report 12/10/99

Attached below is the PA review spreadsheet with complete Global contracts
data.

Please add the following contracts to the matrix:
Tristar Gas Marketing Company's Master Purchase Sale Firm contract # 96007722
for ENA physical delivery of natural gas (no duration limits).

The following master contracts should not be used by EOL and a GTC with
collateral should be used instead:
Tristar Gas Marketing Company's Master Purchase Sale Spot contract # 96002715
for ENA.
Equitable Energy, LLC's Master Purchase Sale Spot contract # 96003661 for ENA.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,
Karen


Dear Mr. TenHave,

We are in receipt of the above referenced letter addressed to Mr. Jeff
Skilling.  At this time, Enron has no interest in investing in prime
timber/woodlands.  We do, however, thank you for the opportunity and wish you
success in this endeavor.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com


Daren,

I have 2 allocation exceptions that require a deal to be extended.  Meter
98-1488 Tenaska is showing small volumes flowed on days there was no deal.
Can you extend the deal throughout the month so that the volumes will have a
deal to link to.    I have the same situation on meter 98-1601.

If you have any questions, please let  me know.

Thanks,

Susan


John, what do you want to do with this?  We had discussed but I wanted to
follow up.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
02:03 PM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
01/22/2001 01:42 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Spring Business Meeting

Dave --

Sorry for the delay in responding.  Dorie has been out after surgery and I
wanted to talk with her first.  Attendance is an issue that can be addressed
via a few initiatives, including:

1) better up-front communication from the Office of the Chair through the
direct supervisors (like we did for United Way last year)
2) entertainment/big-name draw added to the line-up
3) IP-TV as a back-up for those who cannot attend
4) select a better time than last year's meeting (i.e., morning meetings have
been better attended in the past vs. last year's afternoon meeting)

There are no doubt other small changes we can make to enhance attendance, but
this should get us headed in the right direction.  Dorie and I would be happy
to sit down and discuss this with you.

Regardless of what we do to increase attendance, if we wish to do such a
meeting, we need to pick a date and get on the Hyatt calendar soon.  Their
calendar is filling up quickly.  Thanks.

Eric

David W Delainey@ECT
01/16/2001 10:18 AM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Spring Business Meeting

Guys, given all the change and our 2000 success, I would argue that we should
have a meeting; however, the challenge is getting people to show up - any
thoughts on this Eric/Dorie?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
10:21 AM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
01/10/2001 01:50 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spring Business Meeting

Dave and John --

In the past, ENA has held an all-employee business meeting over at the Hyatt
in April or May.  Do you plan to hold such a meeting?  If so, we need to get
started on planning the event.  Dorie Hitchcock has typically handled the
arrangements.  Please advise.

Eric


At the suggestion of Robert Jones (you remember him--one of the growing
legion of ex-GPG HR representatives), I interviewed a lady named Emma Caplan
yesterday.  She is the wife of a guy that Enron Networks brought over to
Houston from London.  She is a "Solicitor" in the English legal system, and
got her law degree at the University of Wales.  She has not taken an American
bar exam but may be able to take DC or New York.  For some reason related to
practice of foreign lawyers in TX, she can't take the TX bar until she has
gotten a US law degree.  This person is very bright, personable, and
enthusiastic.  She is extremely interested in working for Enron, either as a
lawyer once she gets her license squared away, or in a paralegal or analyst
position until then. I left a copy of her resume with Emily, and I'd ask that
she please forward it to each of you.  If any of you have need for such an
individual or have ideas she should pursue within Enron (or outside Enron),
please call Robert or myself.  Thanks.  DF


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2000 12:35
PM ---------------------------

"Germany Jr, Don (WD)" <WDGERMANYJR@dow.com> on 05/15/2000 08:25:43 AM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: INO.com Extreme Markets Daily Digest for May 11, 2000

Check it out.

-----Original Message-----
From: INO.com [mailto:digest@ino.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 11:57 PM
To: wdgermanyjr@dow.com
Subject: INO.com Extreme Markets Daily Digest for May 11, 2000

   E X T R E M E    M A R K E T S    D A I L Y    D I G E S T
              A complimentary service from INO.com

    FREE OPTIONS INDUSTRY COUNCIL CD-ROM
        http://www.ino.com/advertisers/oic/toolbox.html
_____________________________________________________________________

I N   T H I S   E X T R E M E   D I G E S T                   May 11
_____________________________________________________________________

<1>  INO.com Market Wrap
<2>  New Featured Product
<3>  Extreme Market Commentary
<4>  Top News Stories
<5> Extreme Futures
<6> Extreme Stocks
_____________________________________________________________________

<1> I N O . C O M   M A R K E T   W R A P
_____________________________________________________________________

The CRB Index has climbed 1.64 points to 220.57. The US Dollar
Index trended higher 0.72 points to 111.25.

The Dow climbed 178.19 points, at 10545.97, while the S&P 500
rose 24.76 points, last seen at 1407.81. The Nasdaq
Composite rose 114.85 points to 3499.58.

_____________________________________________________________________

<2> F E A T U R E D   P R O D U C T
_____________________________________________________________________

Profit Proven Books, Courses and Software from INO.com!

*** KEYPOINT TRADING (Limited Supplies) ***
The Key To Tomorrow's Market Prices ... Today!
http://www.marketdepot.com/products/keypoint/

*** PROFITABLE DAY TRADING WITH PRECISION ***
Secret Of Price, Time And Market Symmetry
http://store.ino.com/products/angell/

***  TRADING OPTIONS VISUALLY (New Shipment!) ***
26 Automatic, Safety-First Strategies That Create Millionaires!
http://www.marketdepot.com/products/visually/

*** GLOBALcharts 2000 (Special Rates!)***
Technical Analysis and Tracking Software from INO.com
http://store.ino.com/pages.cgi?pr=GC

*** FUTURE MILLIONAIRES ***
Turn 15 Minutes A Day Into $18,000 A Month Extra Cash!
http://store.ino.com/products/larrywilliams/

*** TRADERS LOGBOOK ***
Write it Down!  1000s of Traders Can't be Wrong!
http://store.ino.com/products/logbook/

FLAT/ONE RATE SHIPPING ON ALL ORDERS!

Order Toll Free 800-538-7424 - 410-867-7424
All Products Guaranteed
http://store.ino.com/pages.cgi?pg=guarantee.html

Welcome  http://www.ino.com/
Quotes  http://quotes.ino.com/
Charts  http://quotes.ino.com/chart/
Forum  http://forum.ino.com/
Store  http://store.ino.com/

_____________________________________________________________________

<3> E X T R E M E   M A R K E T   C O M M E N T A R Y
_____________________________________________________________________

The STOCK MARKET closed sharply higher on Thursday following the
release of today's report on retail sales for April, which was down.
Today's report eased trader fears about rising interest rates
however; it is unlikely that it will cause the Fed. to abandon its
current policy of higher interest rates until there is further
evidence of a slow-down in the US economy. Technically, today's
action appears corrective in nature leaving the door open for
sideways too lower prices on Friday. It will take closes above
trendline resistance crossing near 10,760 to temper the near-term
bearish outlook in the Dow.

JUNE BONDS closed higher on Thursday following today's release of
friendly retail sales data. This week's rebound off the 62%
retracement level of this year's rally crossing at 92-31 has allowed
June to challenging initial trendline resistance crossing near 94-09.
Multiple closes above this resistance level would signal a minor low
might be in place.
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CBOT/USM0-daily.html

CRB INDEX surged to new highs for the second day in a row confirming
Wednesday's trading range breakout above 217.88. Sharp gains in
energies supported today's rally in the CRB, which has renewed its
long-term uptrend. I would not be surprised to see the CRB trade
sideways too lower on Friday as it consolidates some of this week's
gains and possibly retest broken resistance at 217.88. However, this
week's move to new highs has opened the door for a possible test of
weekly resistance at 223.23 later this month.
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/NYCE/CRY0-daily.html

CURRENCIES the June Dollar closed higher on Thursday following
Wednesday's late-session turnaround. The setback off last week's low
as the appearance of a potential bull flag. Closes into new highs
would confirm an upside breakout of weekly resistance at 111.37,
which would open the door for a possible test of the 1981 high at
114.88 later this spring. The Swiss Franc and D-mark closed lower on
Thursday with the D-mark gapping down and closing below long-term
support at .4624. Closes below last week's lows in both markets are
needed to renew this spring's declines. The June Japanese Yen posted
a key reversal up after session lows fell short of the Feb. low at
.9125. Additional gains on Friday would confirm today's reversal
pattern however; June needs to close above .9394 to confirm a
short-term bottom has likely been posted.
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/NYCE/DXM0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CME/SFM0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CME/DMM0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CME/ECM0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CME/JYM0-daily.html

PRECIOUS METALS closed mixed on Thursday. June gold posted a new low
close for the week and in doing so turned a number of short-term
momentum indicators bearish. Follow-through weakness on Friday could
set the stage for a possible test of May's low at 273.60 in the near
future. July silver closed lower following Wednesday's inside day
increasing the odds July will try and test this spring's double
bottom at 4.975. Today's mid-range close leaves the door open for
sideways trading on Friday. July copper closed slightly higher on
Thursday after probing last week's gap. Momentum indicators are
overbought and turning bearish warning bulls, time is running out and
downside risk is increasing. Closes below gap support at 82.40 would
confirm a short-term top has been posted.
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/COMEX/HGN0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/COMEX/SIN0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/COMEX/GCM0-daily.html

GRAINS closed higher on fund buying and NOAA weather forecast. July
corn posted an inside day with a fractionally higher close as traders
digested Wednesday's bullish long-range weather forecast from NOAA.
Light consolidation ahead of Friday's supply/demand report also
limited today's gains. NOAA is still calling for a potential drought
this summer, as LaNina is likely to persist through August. A steady
too higher close on Friday sets the stage a possible resumption of
last week's rally next week if hot/dry weather returns to the
Midwest. July wheat gapped up and closed sharply higher for the
second day in a row due to strong fund related buying. Expectations
for a friendly supply/demand report on Friday and bullish weather
forecast have been the driving factors behind this week's rally.
Today's close above minor resistance at 2.78 1/2 makes March's high
at 2.84 July's next target, then this winter's high at 2.95 1/2. The
rising ADX signals additional short-term gains are possible during
May. http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CBOT/CN0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CBOT/WN0-daily.html

SOYBEAN COMPLEX closed steady to lower due to consolidation ahead of
Friday's supply/demand reports. July beans posted an inside day in
relatively quiet trading ahead of tomorrow's reports. Never the less,
this week's rally is turning a number of short-term momentum
indicators neutral too bullish leaving July poised to renew this
year's rally if the weather turns hot and dry next week. Closes above
5.82 1/2 would confirm the uptrend has resumed. July soybean meal
spiked to new highs before light profit taking tempered today's
meager gain. Today's high-range close leaves July poised to extend
this month's move to new highs if Friday's reports come in neutral to
friendly. July bean oil closed lower on Thursday in narrow trading as
the market remains poised to extend its decline off May's high should
Friday's reports come in neutral to bearish. Today's bearish export
sales report does not bode well for the longer-term outlook in bean
oil. If the decline resumes, the 50% retracement level of this
spring's rally at 17.50 is July's next target.
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CBOT/SN0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CBOT/SMN0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CBOT/BON0-daily.html

LIVESTOCK closed lower on Thursday pressured by weaker cash and
product prices. June hogs closed slightly lower but near session
highs as the market attempted to consolidate recent losses amidst a
sharp rebound in bellies. However, lower cash bids and additional
long-liquidation limited to day's rebound as the market is
consolidating above minor support at 71.96. Momentum indicators
remain bearish signaling further losses are possible later this
month. June cattle closed into new lows for the week confirming
Wednesday's trendline breakout. Today's close below April's low at
68.22 sets the stage for a test of March's low at 67.70 in the near
future. Expectations for rising grain prices and declining boxed beef
prices continues to weigh on prices.
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CME/LHM0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CME/LCM0-daily.html

FOOD & FIBER closed mixed on Thursday. July coffee continues to drift
sideways ahead of the May 19 retention plan meeting. July sugar
closed on spec. buying on ideas world surplus should continue to
shrink due to lower production levels in Brazil and other sugar
producing nations. Profit taking ahead of the close tempered today's
gains. July needs to close above 675 to renew this spring's rally.
July cocoa gapped up and closed higher due to fund short covering.
Today's high is challenging this spring's downtrend line crossing
near 830. Multiple closes above this resistance level are needed to
confirm a bottom and trend change. Momentum indicators are turning
bullish signaling additional gains are possible. I would not be
surprised to see an inside day on Friday as July consolidates some of
today's gains. July cotton posted a potential key reversal down on
Thursday after session highs fell short of testing the 75%
retracement level of this spring's decline at 62.76. Today's
mid-range close leaves the door open for sideways trading on Friday.
Bullish short-term weather forecast for West Texas and the southeast
US will continue to underpin prices. Momentum indicators are bullish
and suggest additional gains are possible.
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CSCE/KCN0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CSCE/SBN0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/CSCE/CCN0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/NYCE/CTN0-daily.html

The ENERGY MARKETS closed higher on Thursday with July heating oil
posting a new contract high today. July crude oil has retraced over
75% of this spring's decline setting the stage for a possible test of
March's high at 30.46 later this spring.
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/NYMEX/CLM0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/NYMEX/HOM0-daily.html
http://www.quotewatch.com/charts/futures/NYMEX/HUM0-daily.html

Discuss Commentary -- http://forum.ino.com View Charts --
http://quotes.ino.com

Daily Extreme Commentary is brought to you by GLOBALcharts,
INO.com's end-of-day charting software for Futures, Futures
Options and Optionable Stocks. http://www.globalcharts.com

_____________________________________________________________________

<4> T O P   N E W S   S T O R I E S
_____________________________________________________________________

Stocks

    Japan Stocks Review: Nikkei closes at lowest level since Sept. 27
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21142

    Add1: US Equities Review: Broadly higher on tame retail sales data
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21140

    UK Stocks Review: FTSE 100 closes up as rate hike fears recede
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21150

Forex

    US FX Review: Euro/dollar retreats as market tires of ECB vigil
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21144

    Asia FX Review: Yen buckles under weight of Nikkei's losses
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21141

    Europe FX Review: Market choppy; Mr Euro can't save the euro
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21143

Credit

    Add 1: US Credit Review: Bonds flat; weak sales data elicit selling
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21139

    Europe Credit Review: Bonds fall with weak currencies key
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21146

    Japan Credit Review: June surge; cash fall below 1.7% on weak shares
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21149

Commodities

    US Futures Summary: CRB zooms to fresh 2-year high with energy
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21148

    Japan Commodity Summary: Japan's Tokyo, Yokohama agricultural commodities
futures prices
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21145

    CRB Outlook: Starting higher on cocoa, copper
 http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=21147

Exchange News

   LME Memo On Delisting Of Albatros Warehousing BV
               http://news.ino.com/press/index.cgi?release=21099
   LME Memo On Rudolf Wolff Co Ltd Disciplinary Action
               http://news.ino.com/press/index.cgi?release=21098
   NASD Extends Board Member Election Process By 15 Days
               http://news.ino.com/press/index.cgi?release=21097
   Trading Interrupted At Pacific Exchange
               http://news.ino.com/press/index.cgi?release=21096
   PCX To Trade Options On Tollgrade Communications
               http://news.ino.com/press/index.cgi?release=21095
   NYBOT Reports Cocoa Futures Open Interest Record
               http://news.ino.com/press/index.cgi?release=21094
   Paris Exchange To Study Prospects For Wine Futures Contract
               http://news.ino.com/press/index.cgi?release=21093
   CME's Equity Index Contracts Set New Records
               http://news.ino.com/press/index.cgi?release=21092

_____________________________________________________________________

<5> E X T R E M E   F U T U R E S
_____________________________________________________________________

Extreme Futures - updated every 15 minutes during the trading day
at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremefutures.html

Winners

Symbol Description                             Close    Change      %
HOM0   Heating Oil Jun 2000                   0.7750   +0.0403    5.5
NDM0   NASDAQ 100 Index Jun 2000             3390.00   +133.00    4.1
CCK0   Cocoa May 2000                            796       +31    4.0
RLM0   Russell 2000 Index Jun 2000            494.50    +18.05    3.8
CLM0   Crude Oil Jun 2000                      29.10     +1.01    3.6
PNM0   Propane Gas Jun 2000                   0.5050   +0.0150    3.0
XWK0   Wheat May 2000                            278    +7 1/2    2.8
WK0    Wheat May 2000                        268 1/2    +7 1/2    2.8
PBK0   Frozen Pork Bellies May 2000           92.900    +2.550    2.8
HUM0   New York Harbor Gasoline Jun 2000      0.9365   +0.0244    2.7

Losers

Symbol Description                             Close    Change      %
BDK0   Oriented Strand Board May 2000         234.00     -4.00   -1.7
NKU0   Nikkei 225 Stock Avg Sep 2000           17300      -285   -1.6
KCZ0   Coffee "C" Dec 2000                    105.20     -1.40   -1.3
XMM0   Deutsche Mark Jun 2000                 0.4660   -0.0050   -1.1
ECU0   EuroFX Sep 2000                       0.90740  -0.00960   -1.1
PAU0   Palladium Sep 2000                     578.50     -5.50   -0.9
SFU0   Swiss Franc Sep 2000                  0.58500  -0.00500   -0.8
XKZ0   New York Gold Dec 2000                    285      -2.1   -0.7
GCZ0   Gold Dec 2000                             285      -2.1   -0.7
BPM0   British Pound Jun 2000                 1.5034   -0.0094   -0.6

_____________________________________________________________________

<6> E X T R E M E   S T O C K S
_____________________________________________________________________

Extreme Stocks - updated every 15 minutes during the trading day
at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremestocks.html

Winners

Symbol Description                             Close    Change      %
MNTR   Mentor Corp.                           24 3/8  +6 14/32   35.9
GNET   Go2Net Inc.                            45 5/8    +9 5/8   26.7
ALKS   Alkermes, Inc.                             61 +10 14/32   20.6
LCOS   Lycos, Inc.                                54    +8 5/8   19.0
NMSS   NATURAL MICROSYSTEMS CORP                  67   +10 5/8   18.9
IRF    International Rectifier Corp.        44 26/32        +7   18.5
XICO   Xicor, Inc.                           7 15/32   +1 5/32   18.3
IMRS   INFO MANAGEMENT RESOURCES                  19    +2 3/4   16.9
HNCS   HNC Software, Inc.                    45 6/32    +6 1/2   16.8
LE     Land's End, Inc.                           40    +5 3/4   16.8

Losers

Symbol Description                             Close    Change      %
MYL    Mylan Laboratories, Inc.             23 30/32    -7 1/8  -22.9
BSY    British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC        115       -20  -14.8
WDC    Western Digital Corp.                   5 7/8        -1  -14.6
RCOM   RACOM SYS                                  45    -5 1/2  -10.9
CURE   Curative Health Services, Inc.          5 3/8      -5/8  -10.4
CTSC   Cellular Technical Services Co.             9    -29/32   -9.2
WERN   Werner Enterprises, Inc.              16 6/32  -1 18/32   -8.8
COOL   Cyberian Outpost                       5 6/32      -1/2   -8.8
DMRK   Damark International Inc. A           21 6/32  -1 30/32   -8.4
MLG    Musicland Stores Corp.                  7 1/4    -18/32   -7.2

--- FREE FUTURES TRADERS CALENDAR                                 ---

  FREE reference guide - "Trading Tactics of the Pros"
  http://www.ino.com/advertisers/firstamerican/

_____________________________________________________________________

T H A N K   Y O U
_____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for subscribing to the Extreme Markets Daily Digest from INO.com
(http://www.ino.com). If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit
http://www.ino.com/email/.

To subscribe a friend, visit:
 http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
 http://www.ino.com/email/removeextremes.cgi?email=wdgermanyjr@dow.com

--
Copyright 1998-2000 INO.com. All Rights Reserved.


Thanks.

Rod Hayslett
EB4054
713-853-6178

-----Original Message-----
From: Piro, Jim
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 5:59 PM
To: Hayslett, Rod; Horton, Stanley
Cc: Abrams, Clement; HEIKKINEN, GARY; Shah, Mahendra
Subject: District Cooling Project - Project Financing

We are in the process of closing with US Bank on our financing for the
construction of the first phase of this project for $13 million.  We are
working with the Enron Corp. - Corporate Financing group to obtain a corporate
guarantee for the financing.  This project is currently in PGH2 and is part of
what is being sold with PGE.  The financing guarantee will contemplate this
sale and will allow for the assignment of the guarantee to the new buyer as
long as they meet an agreed upon financial standards (ie. BBB+).  Since we are
under ETS you or Stan might get questions on the project and I wanted to
provide you an overview of the project.

Mahendra Shah of our treasury group has had a conversation with Greg Caudell
and Jim Newgard (both report to Tm Despain) at Enron Corp. Corporate Finance
about the Enron Guaranty for the US Bank construction facility (up to $13
million). He has forwarded to them, the US bank's draft of the Enron guaranty.
 They indicated that the guaranty would probably be redrafted by Clement
Abrams using the standard Enron format.

If you have any questions on the District Cooling Project or need additional
information we can set up a conference call and go over the various aspects of
the project.  We also have the financial model available that we can forward
to you that was reviewed and was the basis of Enron's approval.


Nella Cappaletto has a master list of all Canadian software and applications.

Chris


Reminder

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000 09:14
AM ---------------------------

Heather Choate
01/21/2000 09:55 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cherylene R Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mtg: Calp Transport Setup

   Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss Calp Transport Setup...

  February 1, 2000
  at 3pm in EB3013

   Call x33278, should a conflict arise.

   Thank you.


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/30/2001>, published as of 10/30/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)

Publisher's Notes:

Correction: FT-New York and VNG


There is left over food available on the file cabinets near the reception
area.  Help yourselves.  Thanks.  Teri.


Have a great trip and try not to hook up with too many Italian hotties!  Must
come back with lots of pictures and potentially a few life changing
experiences.


You're right - I'm changing the deal right now.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
12/19/2000 01:01 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 12-19-00 discrepancies

Mike Swerzbin
deal 482593
Prebon shows term as Cal'02 instead of Cal'01

Thanks!!


Steve --

On the people who participated in Reg Risk WG:

The key person who took the time to support us was Amr Ibrahim.  He was
fantastic.  He could do this himself if he didn't have other
responsibilities.  Needs alot of kudos for his help.  Also, Vinio Flores and
Alberto Levy.

Jim

	Steven J Kean
	Sent by: Maureen McVicker
	11/20/2000 10:12 AM

		 To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott Bolton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Dawson/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rubena
Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tracy Cooper/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: WORKING GROUP PROGRESS

Please provide me an update on the progress of the working group you have led
this year.  There are several things I would like you to cover in this regard.

Did the working group function through the year or was it terminated (I
recognize there may be good reasons for the latter, but would like to
understand those reasons).

What did the group accomplish?

Would you recommend continuing it?   Any changes?

Are there other topics we should consider for working groups in the future?
Any changes to the working group process itself?

Please provide input on the individuals you worked with.  You should be able
to do this through the PEP system.  If you cannot, please provide the
feedback by confidential e-mail to me.  Because the PRC is coming up soon,
please provide the feedback by December 1.