Do we need to have a meeting to work through this?  What outside counsel is supporting the sale right now?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Tapscott, Ron
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Lindberg, Susan; Jacoby, Ben; Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc: Zisman, Stuart; Steffes, James D.; Schwartzenburg, John
Subject: RE: Sale of our 50% interest in Doyle to Walton County EMC

but I was of the understanding that the filings were tied to price changes resulting in a different charge to OPC.

thanks, ron.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lindberg, Susan
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:53 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Nicolay, Christi L.; Tapscott, Ron
Cc: Zisman, Stuart; Steffes, James D.; Schwartzenburg, John
Subject: RE: Sale of our 50% interest in Doyle to Walton County EMC

The filing is required since this is an EWG with cost-based rate authority.  The requirement extends even to indirect transfers of ownership such as this one.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:30 AM
To: Lindberg, Susan; Nicolay, Christi L.; Tapscott, Ron
Cc: Zisman, Stuart; Steffes, James D.; Schwartzenburg, John
Subject: RE: Sale of our 50% interest in Doyle to Walton County EMC

Are we sure that this is required in the context of (i) a transfer of the stock in Doyle owned by Powergen Investco LLC, which represents 50% of the equity interest in Doyle, or (ii) an upstream transfer of 100% of the stock in Powergen to Walton EMC?

-----Original Message-----
From:	Lindberg, Susan
Sent:	Thu 9/13/2001 11:09 AM
To:	Jacoby, Ben; Nicolay, Christi L.; Tapscott, Ron
Cc:	Zisman, Stuart; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: Sale of our 50% interest in Doyle to Walton County EMC

Since this is a transfer of jurisdictional assets, the filing required is pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act and Part 33 of the Commission's regulations. Part 33 lists information to be provided and it is fairly extensive.  In order to show that the transaction is in the public interest, the Commission requires that you provide a description of each applicant's business activities, ownership, affiliates and subsidiaries (with a description of their business activities), a list of wholesale power sales customers of the applicants, and of course a description of the transaction.  We made a similar filing recently for the New Albany sale.

There may also have to be a Section 205 filing made if any tariff revisions are required. This is usually a pretty quick filing to prepare.  In the case of the New Albany sale, some minor changes had to be made to the affiliate portion of the tariff sheets.

For the New Albany sale, we used LeBoeuf, Lamb as our counsel.  (Christi -- is this typical, or do we sometimes use Bracewell instead?  In any event, if closing is imminent it sounds as if we need to proceed very quickly.  Please call to discuss.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:45 AM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Tapscott, Ron
Cc: Zisman, Stuart; Lindberg, Susan; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: Sale of our 50% interest in Doyle to Walton County EMC

What is the specific regulatory approval required?

-----Original Message-----
From:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Thu 9/13/2001 10:36 AM
To:	Tapscott, Ron
Cc:	Jacoby, Ben; Zisman, Stuart; Lindberg, Susan; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: Sale of our 50% interest in Doyle to Walton County EMC

Yes. this requires regulatory approval.  It would be a filing that has a 21 day notice period.  It typically requires 45 - 60 days for approval, but we could ask for expedited approval.  I would recommend hiring Andrea Settanni at B&P to make the filing.  She said it would be less than $5000.  I think that on the past sales, either ENA legal or the commercial group hires the outside counsel.  Susan Lindberg can help coordinate it.  Thanks.

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Tapscott, Ron
	Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:29 AM
	To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
	Cc:	Jacoby, Ben; Zisman, Stuart
	Subject:	FW: Sale of our 50% interest in Doyle to Walton County EMC

	Christi,

	if we are selling our interest in Doyle I LLC to Walton EMC, does this require any regulatory approval?  Keep in mind that it will be PGI selling its interest to Walton EMC in the Doyle I LLC.  Doyle I LLC contniues to be the counterparty to the PPA.  It would seem that this should not be a reg issue but we want to make sure.

	Thanks, Ron.

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Zisman, Stuart
	Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:03 AM
	To:	Tapscott, Ron
	Cc:	Tweed, Sheila
	Subject:	RE: Sale of our 50% interest in Doyle to Walton County EMC

	Ron,

	Given that you want to close by the end of the month, has anyone checked to see what regulatory approval will be needed to transfer our 50% interest.  I suspect that we will need FERC approval as Doyle is an EWG with "cost-based-rate" authority.  As an aside, Dan Watkiss did the regulatory work and might be able to respond most quickly.

	Stuart

			 -----Original Message-----
			From: 	Tapscott, Ron
			Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:58 AM
			To:	Zisman, Stuart
			Subject:

			Stuart,

			here is the agreement.  The black-line version is included as well.

			Thanks, Ron.

			 << File: 3b1b03!.DOC >>

			 << File: 3b98RED.DOC >>


Rep Scott McGinnis (colo) told Ken that he would like to be briefed on the
California and broader energy situation so that he can speak out on the issue.
Also, don't forget that we need to go see your buddy Newt!


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT on
09/27/2000 07:42 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chip Schneider @ ENRON                           09/27/2000 06:35 AM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EIX Provides Update on Revenue Shortfall

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chip Schneider/NA/Enron on 09/27/2000
08:22 AM ---------------------------

"Patterson, Paul" <paul.patterson@csfb.com>@fir.fbc.com on 09/27/2000
07:08:18 AM
Sent by: owner-eqr_alevi@fir.fbc.com
To: "eqr_alevi, list" <list.eqr_alevi@csfb.com>, "# CSEQ US Sales, All
(Generalists)" <cseq-us-sale-all-gen@excham.csfb.com>
cc:

Subject: EIX Provides Update on Revenue Shortfall

 <<EIX092600.pdf>>
Good morning,
Today we have a note out on EIX,
1. On September 26, Edison International filed an 8K updating the
amount of revenue shortfall, resulting from its inability to recover high
wholesale power prices from its retail customers.
2. As of August 31, Southern California Edison's revenue account
undercollection was $1.97 billion.  Importantly, this pre-tax figure does
not include the revenues that EIX receives from its remaining generation and
is likely to change over time.
3. Management has indicated that it plans to file a petition with the
California PUC over the next few weeks and pursue other options, including
litigation, to ensure the recovery of its revenue account undercollection.
4. For now, we are maintaining our 2000-2001 EPS estimates of $2.04 and
$2.30, which are based on EIX resolving the purchase power issue in a
favorable manner. However, investors should be cognizant of the high degree
of uncertainty at both the company's regulated and non-regulated businesses.

Paul Patterson, 212-325-5876
Andy Levi, 212-325-0893
Neil Stein, 212-325-4217
Emily Lao Chua, 212-325-1982
Wen-Wen Chen, 212-538-0223

 - EIX092600.pdf


We have received the Q&A for current Enron employees.  The Q&A is posted on the Intranet at http://home.enron.com/updates/qa.html
The posted information may not address all of your questions as quickly as you deserve, but a team is working to provide accurate responses to your most important questions about employee benefits, expense payments and so on.  Be sure to continue checking this web site for updated information.
If the posted info does not address your concerns, you may send your questions to questions@enron.com
Again, thanks for your patience!

Julie Kearney, ENA HR
503) 464-7404


it was ok.  i spent a lot of time at the casino.  did you stay home or go to
austin?  texas looked pretty good on friday.  how is your dad?


Enron employees may find the current circumstances stressful.  We want to remind you that Enron's Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is still available and currently offering services to assist you and your family.

Group Discussions
Beginning this week, Enron's EAP provider, Innovative Resources Group, will be facilitating group discussions for employees who are interested in attending. These sessions are designed to address the challenges employees may be facing and to suggest ways to minimize the impact of stress on employees and their families. These sessions will be held on Wednesday, January 30 and Thursday, January 31 at the following times in EB32C2:

	9:00 am -- 10:00 am
	11:00 am -- 12:00 pm
	1:30  pm --  2:30 pm
	3:30 pm --   4:30 pm

No advance registration is necessary -- simply come to EB32C2 at the scheduled day and time that is most convenient for you.

Onsite Confidential Counseling / 24 Hour Hotline
EAP Counselors are available for individual, confidential appointments onsite in the Enron Building or at a variety of neighborhood locations.  Counselors are also available via telephone 24 hours a day, seven days a week for Enron employees in all locations.  The EAP counseling service is provided at no cost to employees and their family members.  To schedule an appointment or speak with a counselor, please call the onsite office at 713-853-6057 or the 24-hour number at 1-800-345-1391.

Informational Brochures
Additional information about EAP programs will be available in the Body Shop, the Health Center on the third floor of Enron Center North and soon in the common kitchen areas on all floors of the Enron Buildings.

Websites
The following links may also provide helpful information:
www.stress.org -- This is the website of the American Institute of Stress. The site provides general information on stress management and links to other related sites.
www.wellnessjunction.com -- This website has been developed by Health Resources Publishing and provides targeted information on trends in wellness and health promotion.


Tami,

Thanks -- I am so glad you got my materials.

Susan Bailey

 -----Original Message-----
From: Jg77063@aol.com [mailto:Jg77063@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Bailey, Susan
Subject: Re: JLH--OBR Evaluations Due!

Thanks Susan--I received it.  You were the only one who turned hers in w/out a reminder!  Tami


at best i will remove all the bids on the table and give them one for 120mws 45$ bid for planning year jun02-may03.
-narsimha

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Misra, Narsimha
Subject:	PJM_UCAP

Narsimha,

Couple of other time periods that Nick Politis is asking about:

"I have a couple of other time periods for this same customer.  They are naturally long and I think I could work something out if you guys are natural buyers.  The other 2 periods are: Jun-Dec02 (starting one month later than your last quote).  The other period is the PJM planning year Jun02-May03.  The amount could be higher if that works for you guys.  Let me know if you want to do more than 100 MW and I will see what I can do."

Any interest and at what level?


Please find attached the pro formas for the project in San Marcos.

Thanks again.


Mark - How would we structure transactions in UK gas, UK weather, Brent and metals with the various hedge funds run out of New York?  Is there a way to back-to-back them with our London office through their existing ISDAs or would they have to enter into new ISDA agreements with ECTRIC?  Any thoughts you have on this matter would be well received in these quarters.  Thanks.  Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zivic, Robyn
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:16 PM
To:	Musch, Susan
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Dyk, Russell; Lassander, Richard; Radous, Paul; Sayre, Frank
Subject:	European Products

Susan-
As a follow-up on our earlier conversation, the list of European Products which our Hedge Fund Counterparties will probably have/ currently have interest  in trading with Enron are:

UK Gas
UK Weather
Brent
Metals

It is my understanding that the above products are booked under various Enron entities - ie Enron Europe, Enron Global Markets and Enron Liquids & Fuel Inc (ELFI)

Could you pls let us know if we will run into tax problems if: we book all financial transactions between ENA and our counterparties and then
do an Internal transaction between ENA and the above entities to move the risk to the appropriate book.

Thanks for your help

Beat regards,
Robyn
212-715-2396


frott recline is really a foot recline and thanks for keeping me up to date
with the happenings in your life.


I have now registered but have not yet entered my key to gain access to the
deal.


Start Date: 4/4/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040418.txt


I need to talk to the commercial guy on the deal.  Got a name for me?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/30/2000 04:25
PM ---------------------------

"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 08/30/2000 04:10:02 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Skelton option

Kay, I talked with Mark Shaffer in our Atlanta office;  he has no
information on options in the Hart County area.  Sorry we couldn't help.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 11:48 AM
To: aduncan@kilstock.com; Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com
Subject: Skelton option

I'm looking at the Skelton option (Hart County, GA), and can't figure out
when it was executed. (must confess I didn't read EVERY word) Can anyone
help me with this?

Thanks,

Kay


Dr. Ruscitti:

You never responded to my last e-mail lo those many months ago.  How are you?  I hear you're a big fan of Gray Davis.  One thing you can say about Gray, he's colorless.  The poor dishrag is laying the blame at you Texans' feet.  But then, why not?  If I have to listen to G. Bush talking about "nucular" power much longer, I'm going to blame everything on Texas.

How's marriage?  How's Enron?  I hope all's well, and that you're about to expand your family.

If you have any news, or plan to be out this way, please look me up.

Best,

Tim


Who is working on assignment of CES deals in the Statoil portfolio to J.
Aron???  We have succesfully moved all the other financial deals and have
obtained collateral from J. Aron.  However, $10MM of exposure remains behind
in the CES/Statoil portfolio.  Would this not have been included in the
assignment? Please advise status.

Molly

Molly Harris
08/08/2000 08:30 AM
To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Acquisition of certain assets of Columbia Energy Services
Corporation - Financial Trading

Samantha

Please update on status.

Molly

From: Susan Bailey on 07/19/2000 12:05 PM
To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Acquisition of certain assets of Columbia Energy Services
Corporation - Financial Trading

Samantha,

Please advise Molly as to her request.

Molly,

Samantha Boyd has inherited all matters relating to the captioned matter,so
please direct all future inquiries to her.

Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 11:54 AM -----

	Molly Harris
	07/19/2000 10:24 AM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Acquisition of certain assets of Columbia Energy Services
Corporation - Financial Trading

Susan

Do you know status of moving CES deals in Statoil to J. Aron?  We finally
obtained the execution of Statoil to J. Aron; however, it seems the CES deals
have been left out.

Please advise
Molly

Susan Flynn
07/05/2000 05:30 PM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Souad
Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yolanda
Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S
Bryan@Enron
cc:
Subject: Acquisition of certain assets of Columbia Energy Services
Corporation - Financial Trading

Pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 22, 1999, among
Columbia Energy Services Corporation ("Columbia"), certain affiliates of
Columbia and ENA, Columbia has sold and assigned to ENA certain assets,
including but not limited to:   (i) certain Master Agreements (financial
trading) and the transactions thereunder; and (ii) certain Columbia financial
transactions that are not covered by a Columbia Master Agreement (financial
trading).    We are in the process of transferring the Columbia transactions
to ENA Master Agreements and terminating the Columbia Master Agreements, when
possible.

 Recently Received
 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between
ENA, Aquila Risk Management Corporation ("ARMC"), and Utilicorp United
("Utilicorp"), dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   As of January 1,
2000, this agreement terminates the ISDA Master  Agreement between Columbia
and ARMC, dated as of January 16, 1998, and transfers the Transactions
thereunder to the Master Agreement between ENA and ARMC, dated as of November
22, 1993 (the "ENA/ARMC Master Agreement").    As of June 21, 2000, this
Agreement then terminates the ENA/ARMC Master Agreement  and transfers the
ENA/ARMC Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and
Utilicorp, dated as of May 3, 2000.
 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between
Columbia, ENA,  and Bank of America, N.A. ("BofA"), dated effective as of
January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and BofA, dated as of June 14, 1998, and transfers the
Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between between ENA and
BofA, dated as of  February 28, 1992.
 In connection with the execution of the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA
and J. Aron & Company ("J. Aron"), dated as of August 14, 1998 ("ENA/J. Aron
Master Agreement"),  a paragraph was added into the  agreement wherein the
Commodity Price Swap Agreement between Columbia and J. Aron, dated as of
September 16, 1993, is terminated and the Transactions thereunder are
transferred to the ENA/J. Aron Master Agreement, effective as of January 1,
2000.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between
ENA and Koch Energy Trading, Inc., f/k/a Koch Gas Services Company  ("Koch"),
dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA
Master Agreement between Columbia and Koch, dated as of April 24, 1996, and
transfers the Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between
ENA and Koch, dated as of  May 23, 1994.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between
ENA and  Oneok Energy Marketing and Trading Company, L.P.,
successor-in-interest to KN Marketing, L.P., successor by assignment to KN
Trading, Inc. ("Oneok, L.P."), dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   This
agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement between Columbia and Oneok,
L.P., dated as of January 26, 1998, and transfers the Transactions thereunder
to the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and Oneok, L.P. , dated as of  April
13, 1995.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between
Columbia, ENA and  Sempra Energy Trading Corp., f/k/a AIG Trading Corporation
("Sempra"), dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   This agreement
terminates the Letter Agreement between Columbia and Sempra, dated as of June
4, 1993, and transfers the Transactions thereunder to the Master Trading
Agreement between ENA and Sempra, dated as of February 22, 1996.

 Previously Received

 We have received the executed Assignment Agreement between ENA and Bank of
Montreal ("BOM"), dated effective as of January 18, 2000.   This agreement
terminates the ISDA Master Agreement between Columbia and BOM, dated as of
October 24, 1997, and transfers the Transactions thereunder to the ISDA
Master Agreement between ENA and BOM, dated as of November 15, 1996.

 The ISDA Master Agreement between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
("CIBC") and Columbia Energy Services Corporation, dated as of July 15, 1998,
will remain in place but will be inactive.   No trades can be done under this
Master Agreement.   All trades between ENA and CIBC should be done under the
ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and CIBC, dated as of October 1, 1994.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Conoco Inc. ("Conoco"), dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   This
agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement between Columbia and Conoco,
dated as of January 26, 1998, and transfers the Transactions thereunder to
the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and Conoco, dated as of  March 28,
1996.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Delmarva Power & Light Company ("Delmarva"), dated effective as of
January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and Delmarva, dated as of January 26, 1999, and transfers
the Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and
Delmarva, dated as of  March 12, 1998.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Dynegy Marketing and Trade, f/k/a Natural Gas Clearinghouse ("Dynegy"),
dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA
Master Agreement between Columbia and Dynegy, dated as of December 1, 1998,
and transfers the Transactions thereunder to the Master Agreement between ENA
and Dynegy, dated as of January 27, 1992.
 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C. ("Duke"), dated effective as of
January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and Duke, dated as of January 8, 1998, and transfers the
Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and Duke,
dated as of October 17, 1997.
 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and El Paso Merchant Energy-Gas, L.P.  ("El Paso"), dated effective as of
January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates (i) the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and Sonat Marketing Company, L.P., dated as of June 1, 1998,
and (ii) the ISDA Master Agreement between Columbia and El Paso Energy
Marketing Company, dated as of January 1, 1998) and transfers the
Transactions under both of thto the Amended and Restated Master Agreement
between ENA and El-Paso, dated as of  April 20, 1995.
 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Entergy Power Marketing Corp. ("Entergy"), dated effective as of January
1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement between
Columbia and Entergy, dated as of December 4, 1997, and transfers the
Transactions thereunder to the Master Agreement between ENA and Entergy,
dated as of December 9, 1996.
 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Merchant Enery Group of the Americas, Inc. ("MEGA"), dated effective as
of January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and MEGA, dated as of July 6, 1998, and transfers the
Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and MEGA,
dated as of May 14, 1998.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. ("Morgan Stanley"), dated effective as
of January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and Morgan Stanley, dated as of May 1, 1997, and transfers
the Transactions thereunder to the Master Energy Price Swap Agreement between
ENA and Morgan Stanley, dated as of  June 16, 1992.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Paribas, dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   This agreement
terminates the ISDA Master Agreement between Columbia and Paribas, dated as
of July 1, 1997, and transfers the Transactions thereunder to the Amended and
Restated ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and Paribas, dated as of June 28,
1995.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and PG&E Energy Trading-Gas Corporation ("PG&E"), dated effective as of
January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and PG&E, dated as of January 26, 1998, and transfers the
Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and PG&E,
dated as of  January 15, 1999.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Reliant Energy Services, Inc.("Reliant"), f/k/a NorAm Energy Services,
Inc., dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the
ISDA Master Agreement between Columbia and Reliant, dated as of April 27,
1998, and transfers the Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement
between ENA and Reliant, dated as of October 15, 1993.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Southern Company Energy Marketing, L.P. ("Southern"), dated effective as
of January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and Southern, dated as of December 1, 1998, and transfers
the Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and
Southern, dated as of June 1, 1994.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and  Statoil Energy Trading, Inc., assignee of Statoil Energy Services, Inc.,
f/k/a Eastern Energy Marketing, Inc. ("Statoil"), dated effective as of
January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and Statoil, dated as of May 20, 1998, and transfers the
Transactions thereunder to the Master Agreement between ENA and Statoil,
dated as of  August 26, 1996.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Tenaska Marketing Ventures ("Tenaska"), dated effective as of January 1,
2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement between Columbia
and Tenaska, dated as of January 26, 1998, and transfers the Transactions
thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and Tenaska, dated as of
January 19, 1995.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. ("Tractebel"), dated effective as of
January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and Tractebel, dated as of January 26, 1998, and transfers
the Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and
Tractebel, dated as of December 9, 1997.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and TXU Energy Trading Company ("TXU"), f/k/a Enserch Energy Services, Inc.,
dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA
Master Agreement between Columbia and TXU, dated as of January 26, 1998, and
transfers the Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master Agreement between
ENA and TXU, dated as of October 19, 1995.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Western Gas Resources, Inc. ("Western Gas"), dated effective as of
January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates the ISDA Master Agreement
between Columbia and Western Gas, dated as of March 20, 1998, and transfers
the Transactions thereunder to the Master Agreement between ENA and Western
Gas, dated as of March 1, 1994.

 We have received the executed Transfer and Termination Agreement between ENA
and Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Company ("Williams"), f/k/a Williams
Energy Services Company, f/k/a Williams Energy Derivatives and Trading
Company, dated effective as of January 1, 2000.   This agreement terminates
the ISDA Master Agreement between Columbia and Williams, dated as of February
8, 1998, and transfers the Transactions thereunder to the ISDA Master
Agreement between ENA and Williams, dated as of June 18, 1993.

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490


BEER DIE  TOURNAMENT!!!!!!!!!!

When: Fri the 18th and Sat the  19th
This Weekend

We will start friday night at 7pm, for  seating and the tournament will take place saturday night for the glory at the  same time. You need to have a team by friday in order to play in the tournament.  You can sign up on the sheet on the front door or either email me or drop a  note in my box with you and your partners name on it. If you do not sign up by  friday then you will not be allowed to play on saturday. You can either bring  your own booze or chip in some cash for booze here at the house. Pledges and  alumni are highly encourged to play.


Are you going to put it in the system or do you just want me to do it?


Is this because we have not rolled 2001 actuals in and thru 2002 plan.  We are woking on this as we speak.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


I wanted to let you know that I sent you the TW Daily Balance report in Business Objects this afternoon. When you get a chance, will you retrieve it and try to refresh it, please? It may take a couple of minutes to refresh, so don't worry if it seems to be taking a long time.

By having the report yourself, we can start working on automating your imbalance monitoring process, or at the very least, we may be able to come up with a way to make the estimated imbalance on the report more accurate, as Tracy and Dan requested.

Let me know how it goes.

Thanks.

Ken Powers
(402) 398-7065


I will give you my 3rd and 9th round picks for your 2nd.

Let me know.


All done.
PL


I will be back Wednesday night.  Please leave me a message if you need
anything. Hope your presentation goes well!
Ben


---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2000
09:43 AM ---------------------------

groetzingerp@valero.com on 02/11/2000 04:08:47 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Clear Lake Methanol

Our people tell me that the T/A is going as planned and CLMP plans to begin
start up on Sunday. Since it is a cold startup, it could take as long as a
week to get to full rates. In any event, CLMP plans to begin pulling gas at
reduced rates late Sunday or so.


But do we need it immediately? Can we file later for retail authority?
--------------------------
Jim Steffes
Enron


Mark,

I think I need some help reconciling what Steve Richman has and we have
booked for the HUB deals.  He sent me a spreadsheet with deals but I cannot
even come close to tying them out to what we have booked in Tagg.  Richard
suggested I contact you since Steve is out.  Attached is a list of deals we
currently have booked in Tagg for the HUB deals.  They need to be verified
before I can calc them for value and positions.  I will be out tomorrow,
returning on Monday.  Thanks for your help.  Please call me with any
questions.

DG
713-853-9573


I am sorry that you are having problems with Shanna.  I am proud that you are doing the right thing and welcoming a new person at school.  It can be very dificult to be the new kid at a new school.  It sounds like Shanna feels threaten by you and others being friendly to this new girl.  I know it is hard but some how you need to reassure Shanna that you being nice to the new girl does not mean she (Shanna) is less of your friend.  Maybe the best approach is to ask Shanna how she would feel if she had to move to a new school and was treated badly by some of the new girls she met.  You and Shanna have been friends for a long time and you don't want to lose that, but she needs to know that you will continue to welcome new kids that come school and it does not impact your friendship with her.

To answer your question, things are OK.  There is still a lot of uncertainty with the Dynegy and Enron merger and it is not going to be fixed any time soon.  All I can do is try to do the best job I can and let everything else work itself out.

I am going to an NWAL meeting tonight at 7:30 so I will see you probably about bed time.

Thanks for writing to me.

Love,

Dad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kathryn Martin" <kitkatmartin@msn.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:55 PM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	HI!

DAD

HI THIS IS KAT. HOW IS EVERYTHING GOING? SHANNA IS NOT EVEN TRYING TO BE NICER!!!!!!!!!! TELL LAURA I SAID HI.WELL GOTTA GO. LOVE YOU!!!!

KAT

P.S. WRITE BACK!!


what city is that area code from?


Here are initial requirements for the Services Extra-Net.

Please let me know if you have comments/changes.

Thank you.

Debra

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Jeffrey
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:27 AM
To:	Bailey, Debra
Cc:	May, Tom; Will, Lloyd; Baughman, Edward D.
Subject:	ExtraNet Summary

Debra,

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Jeff


fyi
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ramsey, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:29 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	RE: AA 587

Hello Steve,

I left Mike Hicks a voicemail message yesterday.

TAP (US & Canada), Navigant (Nepco, Seattle) Vitol (Domestic), Ayscough (London), Imperial Tour (PGE, Portland) and Travel Management Consultants (EES, Chicago) confirmed that we did not have any employees booked on flight 587.

Eight (8) employees were identified with reservations to leave New York yesterday.  They were all contacted and ultimately able to proceed with travel plans.

Please don't hesitate to phone me directly if you have any questions.
Tracy x68311

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kean, Steven J.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:09 AM
To:	Ramsey, Tracy
Subject:	RE: AA 587

Anything further yet?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ramsey, Tracy
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:31 AM
To:	Hicks, Michael
Cc:	Cleaveland, Derryl; Kean, Steven J.; Leath, Jeff
Subject:	AA 587

Mike -

American Airlines flight 587
New York, NY Kennedy (JFK) to Sano Domingo, Dominican Repub (SDQ):
Travel Agency in the Park - No passengers booked
Ayscough (London Based Travel Agency) - No passengers booked
I am waiting for confirmation from Vitol, Navigant & Travel Management Consultants.

Due to the closing of NYC bridges and tunnels, I have also requested a passenger name listing of any employees currently in NYC.  I will forward this report to you soonest.

Tracy Ramsey
Director, Global Travel Services
X68311
713-305-5561 Cell


Virginia,
I also had a question on a PMA from January.  On TransAlta deal #509285, your notes indicate that mw volumes for HE 23 and HE 24 were reduced by 95 mws each hour.  Enpower and the inc sheet do not reflect this change.  The PMA indicates a charge of $42750 for a reduction in our purchase from Transalta.  Why would we receive a charge for a reduction in purchased energy (ie. less money from us to Transalta)?  There is no indication of a reduction in volume on the other side of the trade (sale to Sempra-Deal#509277). Please come see me when you have a chance.  I think we need to go through this.

Thanks,
Bill


I totally understand..  Any news as to Scott (Codi)?
Thanks

Craig

On Thu, 23 August 2001, Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com wrote:

>
> not so interested.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   craigjefferies@ckbenergy.com@ENRON
>              [mailto:IMCEANOTES-craigjefferies+40ckbenergy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:44 PM
>    To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
>    Subject:  Trader  - Commodity Options
>
>    Jeff:
>
>    This trader would like to trade options on Oil or Gas if possible.  This
>    would mean he would have to train under a senior person. What are your
>    thoughts?
>
>    Regards
>
>
>    Craig Jefferies
>    President
>    CKB Energy, Inc.
>    (917) 445 1189
>
>
>
>     - jlee1.doc << File: jlee1.doc >>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Greetings YPOers!

Last chance for those of you who have not signed up for this upcoming YPO
Fly Away of a lifetime.

In case you forgot what your missing here is a recap of events:
Dinner at Palace Cafe
Brunch at Commander's Palace
Ride on the Krewe of Orpheus float in full costume.
Party at Krewe of Orpheus Ball and lots of more surprises!

Cost per rider is $3,300.00 per person.  Spouses are welcome to ride too!

You have until July 1st to respond and then it is open to WPOers!

The dates again are February 10 - 12, 2002.

Please contact Kay-La Hughes at 713-522-9223 ext. 310 to sign up!

Les Bon Temps Rouler!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff_Hines@hines.com [mailto:Jeff_Hines@hines.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:54 PM
To: dalexander@weingarten.com; marwan@nestgroup.com;
brian.becker@sfx.com; blanton@swbell.net; gborlenghi@interfin.com;
bbown@totalsafetyinc.com; abreco@ix.netcom.com;
alex@brennanshouston.com; gbrenn@coair.com; tbrock@brockgroup.com;
sbunting@mccoyinc.com; rayc@pointecom.net; nelgai@swbell.net;
jcrane@eagleusa.com; adeleon@lionforce.com;
larry.delpapa@delpapabud.com; george@demontrond.com;
jdiaz@personix.fiserv.com; jackd@dmcmgmt.com; lesliedoggett@hotmail.com;
mduffey@carriageservices.com; jduncan@chartertitle.com;
bfaith@greystar.com; rfant@nps.cc; rfleishman@grupotampico.com.mx;
jim.flores@oceanenergy.com; sfordham@netversant.com;
fosheed@nuevoenergy.com; barbroy@worldnet.att.net; tdfriedkin@fcinc.cc;
galtney@galtney.com; kgenssler@aol.com; dgochman@academy.com;
wgolinkin@norwoodaustin.com; jgraf@valic.com; ldgray@flex.net;
pcg@gregorycook.com; swwrceo@aol.com; phawk@teamindustrialservices.com;
larry_heard@transwestern.net; jhildebrand@hilcorp.com;
pwhobby@hobbycomm.com; blake@hoganinvestment.com;
mholthouse@holthouseinterests.com; bhotzemind@aol.com;
bhowell@lodestarlogistics.com; nkelley@tqcap.com;
mkhourie@trammellcrow.com; jknox@suretec.com; jpkotts@jpkotts.com;
mekuebler@aol.com; kkurtzman@ashford.com; jwlander@worldnet.att.net;
wvlarkin@travisintl.com; craigl@hypercon.com; flummis@summit-cap.com;
tlykos@hearthside.com; jlynch@sleh.com; moezm@whg.com;
rpmark5@hotmail.com; smarnoy@ophouston.com; kevinm@home.hern.org;
fmcguyer@mhinc.com; scott.j.mclean@chase.com;
waltm@wheatstoneinvestments.com; billymont@aol.com;
michaelm@morgangroup.com; rmosbacher@compuserve.com; dmurph56@aol.com;
pmurphy@swbanktx.com; cmnjr@tex-trude.com; jim.noteware@kaiseral.com;
doubleoranch@aol.com; apetrello@nabors.com; plank@speedshore.com;
pregan@ermsw.com; gary.remy@prodigy.net; dougs@senterracorp.com;
andrews@boxerproperty.com; tsimmons@spencerstuart.com;
jeff.skilling@enron.com; msmith@mikesmithdirect.com;
dsolomon@redstonecompanies.com; astein3183@aol.com; garys@sss-steel.com;
rnstnhgn@earthlink.net; siera1@houston.rr.com; taylor@taylorwilson.com;
texastbell@aol.com; arthurtei@cooperrig.com; wutt@tractebelusa.com;
mawallac@texaschildrenshospital.org; craigeward@aol.com;
pwareing@aol.com; dweekley@dwhomes.com; kwhalen@mccallgroup.com;
keith@gammaconst.com; gwilson@wilsonfg.com
Cc: jspell@weingarten.com; iris@nestgroup.com; faith.clary@sfx.com;
lynn77327@netscape.net; cjohnston@interfin.com;
ggonzales@totalsafetyinc.com; athomas@brecoholdings.com;
khughes@brennanshouston.com; mzycha@coair.com; cmiller@brockgroup.com;
anewburn@mccoyinc.com; debrak@pointecom.net; jreindl@eagleusa.com;
cheryl.sluder@delpapabud.com; carolynt@demontrond.com;
bhogle@personix.fiserv.com; juliam@dmcmgmt.com;
vmcarthur@carriageservices.com; dskyler@chartertitle.com;
treace@greystar.com; eramsey@nps.cc; garzad@flash.net;
cathy.burns@oceanenergy.com; rogersamy@nuevoenergy.com;
barbroy@worldnet.att.net; ceburley@fcinc.cc; fast@galtney.com;
christineg@scaltech.com; gedgar@academy.com; shudson@norwood.com;
rhenry@valic.com; tconnor@southwestwirerope.com;
asmith@teamindustrialservices.com; tina_rando@transwestern.net;
cwallen@hilcorp.com; julie_mathis@hines.com; ksaucier@hobbycomm.com;
vicky@hoganinvestment.com; pcarmody@holthouseinterests.com;
susanb@ceconet.com; lbernard@lodestarlogistics.com; kjohnson@tqcap.com;
nbraun@trammellcrow.com; dibanez@suretec.com; mcollier@jpkotts.com;
tmclean@bayhouston.com; swright@ashford.com; jan_levine@travisintl.com;
vivld@yahoo.com; lhowe@summit-cap.com; jvaughn@hearthside.com;
zlas02@sleh.com; sallyws@whg.com; dstmary@altivia.com;
apuckett@ophouston.com; blade90123@aol.com; dhuff@mhinc.com;
sheryl.pressler@chase.com; hopeg@wheatstoneinvestments.com;
gailg@morgangroup.com; marykloss@compuserve.com; dpipkin@swbanktx.com;
donna.boyd@kaiseral.com; bpattillo@nabors.com; ylreid@speedshore.com;
kmartinez@ermsw.com; missas@senterracorp.com; barbieh@boxerproperty.com;
lhooper@spencerstuart.com; sherri.sera@enron.com;
mbabineaux@mikesmithdirect.com; abutler@redstonecompanies.com;
pball@insync.net; carmenz@sss-steel.com; slimbocker@soc-fastlane.com;
dewey@taylorwilson.com; ltaylor@familyeats.com;
brutledge@tractebelusa.com; bfrobins@texaschildrenshospital.org;
dbcagle@swbell.net; pdettloff@dwhomes.com; dmusslewhite@mccallgroup.com;
gloria@gammaconst.com; ehannah@wilsonfg.com


Hi Herman,

This is another turbine transaction.  I think there will be another turn of
this doc soon, but I want you to have a heads up.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001 12:47
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/11/2001 10:54 AM
To: Rhett Jackson/Enron@EnronXGate, Matthew F Gockerman/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: ENA/Blue Dog: Revised Letter Agreement

Hi Tax Gurus,

I was out when you called the other day.  Since then, we have another version
of the docs anyway.  Would you like to schedule a time to discuss this with
me and outside counsel?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001 10:52
AM ---------------------------

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/11/2001 10:45:43 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com>

Subject: ENA/Blue Dog: Revised Letter Agreement

Kay:

I am attaching a blackline of the Letter Agreement that includes
Marguerite's latest changes so that your tax/accounting specialists may
review Section 5(e) (which deals with deemed refunds and deemed payments).
Although we are still reviewing the Letter Agreement and the other
transaction documents, we wanted to alert you to Section 5(e) so that we
could discuss this provision with you on the 12:30 call.

Thanks,

John and Marisa

 <<2xn3RED.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2xn3RED.DOC


Why are you congradulating me, I work for Delainey.


Here's some general mumbo-jumbo on what we discussed the other day.

As next steps, we need to integrate these policy statements with Roger's
analysis and comments on PGE.

Have a good weekend.


Jeff,
The GISB drafting meetings are going to be at Williams' offices in the
Galleria.  They will be on the afternoon of Monday, May 21st, all day Tues
May 22 and the morning of Wed May 23 .  I will give you more details when I
get them.

Stacy


The stuff is being delivered in accordance with the notice provision of the
letter agreements, which means the  original goes to "President".  A copy is
also being delivered to George, so he would be a good one to make
distribution at Intergen.

Kay

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
01/08/2001 05:48 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

Who at Intergen are the agreements being delivered to?

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/08/2001 05:35 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

I had Ozzie sign it, and it has been sent to Carolyn.

Kay

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
01/08/2001 05:32 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

I'm happy doing it, or Fred can sign.

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/08/2001 03:41 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

Do you want to print, sign and fax, or shall I take to Janet or someone else
to sign?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 03:37
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/08/2001 03:30:43 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

 <<2TCV01!.DOC>>
Kay:

Per your request, enclosed is a proposed letter to SEL enclosing the final
facility agreements.  I have included a "receipt acknowledged" signature in
the proposed letter, although I believe this is optional as long as our
courier, upon delivery, obtains a signature acknowledging receipt.  Please
advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 131359v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2TCV01!.DOC


Please speak to Mark Taylor but all final GTCs were sent by him on the 4/5th
August to my team and are in the process of  been loaded into the system.

I believe that Mark did not receive any language in time as per meeting
discussion.

Sandra Hrna
12/08/99 23:58
To: David G Mally/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael L
Fredell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janine
Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Online

Louise/Dave
I wanted to follow up with you regarding the general terms and conditions
(GTC) for the products to be sold via Enron Online.  Per our memo dated
August 5, 1999, the GTCs for coal and power products did not include any tax
language.  For Enron's protection, it is imperative that the appropriate tax
language be added to these documents.  Please let me know how we can ensure
the appropriate tax language is in our online GTC's before we go live.
Sandra


If you wish to run sensitivities to heat rate and daily dispatch,  I have
attached the spreadsheet below.

Tyrell
303 575 6478


Susan Fallon 58431


Per your request, attached are the presentation slides from yesterday.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com(See attached file: DRT2486.PPT)
 - DRT2486.PPT


Faith,

Attached is information regarding the Texas Desk as it relates to the current
Texas market, EOL performance metrics, and Post HPL Action Plan.

Please do not hesitate to call with questions.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


>X-Sender: mflorio@mail.turn.org
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
>Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 18:24:35 -0800
>To: "Bill Marcus" <bill@jbsenergy.com>,"Sara Myers"<ssmyers@hooked.net>,
> <mshames@ucan.org>,<Dan_Kirshner@environmentaldefense.org >,
> "Jim Caldwell" <tgaljhc@aol.com>,<vjw@cleanpower.org>,
> "Julian, Bill" <bill.julian@gov.ca.gov>
>From: Mike Florio <mflorio@turn.org>
>Subject: Fwd: Re: Wohin gehen wir?
>
>I forgot to hit the "reply to all" button when I responded to Rich . . . .
>
>
>>Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 18:20:06 -0800
>>To: Rich Ferguson <Rich@Cleanpower.org>
>>From: Mike Florio <mflorio@turn.org>
>>Subject: Re: Wohin gehen wir?
>>Cc: ETeam
>>
>>Rich--
>>         I like the idea, but I'm not sure I'm a very good test case.
>After all, I have been branded as the last living defender of command and
>control regulation, socialist central planning, and everything else "bad"
>that you've ever thought of.
>>         Could the role of CalPower be better filled by an existing
>for-profit company? [eg Enron?].  NO WAY!  Any private seller would have all
>the same conflicts as the utilities, and then some.   But Michael Shames is
>interested in the idea of auctioning off all or parts of the retail
>franchise in San Diego, since SDG&E doesn't seem to want to be in the
>business anymore.  I have been pushing a core/noncore distinction such as
>you suggest, although I haven't been bold enough to suggest a non-profit
>procurement entity.  (I did push this idea for PG&E's gas procurement back
>in the bad old Gas Accord days, but the idea got nowhere then.)  What I've
>talked about is including the retained (at least for now) generation in the
>core portfolio, along with some contracts and some spot.  Haven't developed
>any numbers yet.
>>         I would certainly encourage shopping the idea.  Sellers will
>probably hate it, because this entity would have more market buying power
>than even the current UDCs.  But so what, that's what we want, right?  I'd
>suggest running it by Bill Julian for a political straight face test, but I
>would guess he'd like it.  And it would be a perfect vehicle for RPS, which
>we would certainly like to revive.    Let's keep exploring this.    MIKE
>>
>>
>>
>>At 04:52 PM 11/03/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>>>Folks,
>>>I am growing increasingly worried about future public policy oversight of
>utility power purchases, given the current conventional wisdom that more
>long term purchases should be made. I have been promoting the notion that
>the default power portfolio should be maintained by a new non-profit
>quasi-public entity with revenues guaranteed by the PUC, rather than by
>three separate IOUs subject (or not) to reasonableness reviews. Your
>comments on this notion are eagerly sought.
>>>
>>>Purchasing power for default customers
>>>The recently proposed FERC decision essentially puts California back where
>it was in 1990. There appears to be near universal agreement that the IOUs
>should enter into long term power purchase agreements and limit exposure to
>the spot market. As you recall, the BRPU reached the same conclusion,
>decided how much should be purchased, held the auction, etc.. And then FERC
>blew it up after deciding that the state's avoided cost estimates were
>wrong. FERC appears now to agree it made a mistake, and essentially orders
>us to start the process all over again.
>>>
>>>However, the proposed order makes no mention of state oversight of utility
>purchases. But at the briefing held last Wednesday for Bowen and legislative
>staff, FERC staff made it clear that they were not mandating any alternative
>to replace the must sell/buy requirement that they were eliminating.
>Presumably the state could still mandate the IOUs buy 90% in the PX (or
>whatever) and still comply with the FERC order. As long as the utilities
>remain regulated by the PUC, the state can control their power purchases.
>>>
>>>The problem is that after screwing around for ten years, there is now
>enormous pressure to let the utilities do what they will, a result that I
>fear would be bad for consumers and bad for the environment. On the other
>hand, there no time nor stomach for repeating the BRPU process.
>>>
>>>My preferred solution is the establishment of a new, not for profit
>"utility", that would make power portfolio decisions for default customers -
>let's call it CalPower.  The three existing regulated utilities would no
>longer sell energy at retail. CalPower decisions would be subject to
>whatever public policy conditions the legislature and/or the PUC chose to
>impose. However, some kind expedited review process would allow CalPower to
>be very nimble in the power market and recovery of their revenue requirement
>would be guaranteed. Direction of CalPower could be by political appointees,
>elected representatives, or some combination. My fantasy is a governance
>structure similar to CalPERS, in which broad legislative guidelines are
>interpreted by a board of directors and implemented by experienced traders.
>>>
>>>Compared to the present structure in which default portfolios are designed
>by three different for-profit utilities, CalPower appears to have the
>following advantages:
>>>The non-profit structure eliminates all financial conflicts of interest in
>portfolio design and ensures optimum implementation of public policy goals;
>>>It ensures equitable treatment of all customers state-wide, with price
>differences reflecting market realities rather than differing purchase
>criteria by each utility;
>>>It allows CalPower to be as nimble in the market as any other commercial
>trader by allowing the PUC or other state agencies to participate in
>portfolio design issues up-front, rather than requiring lengthy after the
>fact review.
>>>
>>>CalPower's disadvantage appears to be that it requires yet another new
>state-chartered non-profit organization. Politicians appear intent on
>blaming the two they have already and returning to the old utility-centric
>system, rather than risk their necks by proposing solutions that they then
>would be responsible for.
>>>
>>>Obviously, there are many questions and details to be worked out.
>>>Which customers would be default customers? [My option would be to declare
>all customers under 50 KW permanent default customers - green or other
>marketers could participate through contracts for differences, but physical
>power would be acquired for all these customers by CalPower. Customers >
>50KW would be on their own.]
>>>What is the relationship with the PUC? With the legislature?
>>>Could the role of CalPower be better filled by an existing for-profit
>company? [eg Enron?]
>>>How are the benefits/costs of existing utility generation assets and PP
>contracts shared?
>>>Etc
>>>
>>>Is this concept attractive enough to be worth pursuing? The next step
>would be to get a group of interested parties together to put some meat on
>these bones and float the idea seriously - perhaps even get some draft
>legislation on paper to shop around. Interested? Let me know.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Rich
>


Pat:

Recently, I talked with you about ordering another filing unit.  It turns out
that we need 2 more filing units.  Please order them the same size as the
floor to ceiling cabinet we have.  Have the inside of the cabinets configured
as follows:

1 Cabinet should have 5 shelves
1 Cabinet should have 6 shelves

When Interstore was here today reconfiguing 2 of our existing cabinets, they
removed 8 shelves that they are going to use on these new units.

Please price these 2 new units and charge them to Co. # 0413, RC # 107043.
Please let me the prices and approximate delivery date.  Also, let me  know
if you need anything else.  Thanks.  Anita


Shari:

As per Tana, it is not necessary to respond at all for "Declined."  However,
you do need to respond in any other circumstance, including where credit has
"X"'d the counterparty.

Leslie

	Shari Stack
	08/24/2000 06:07 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: (bcc: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses 08/23/00

Thanks for this - Leslie had thought that you would like to have a response
next to each name. But I will take you up your suggestion!

If I recall correctly - only the first one had "Declined" next to the name.
For the others - I had to scroll right to look for Credit's "X" in the
product list. Do you want me to mention those where Credit has put an X?

	Tana Jones
	08/24/2000 06:03 PM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses 08/23/00

Shari,

To save you some time in the future, if a counterparty says "declined" on the
worksheet, you don't even have to look at it at all, because it means Credit
has decided not to trade with them.

	Shari Stack
	08/24/2000 03:00 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Responses 08/23/00

Tana:

The following CPs are not authorized to trade US power products:

Maguire Oil Company-  Restricted by Credit
Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.-  Restricted by Credit
Panda Energy International, Inc. - Restricted by Credit
Roswell Energy, Inc. Restricted by Credit
Copano Energy Services/Upper Gulf Coast L.P.- Restricted by Credit
US Steel:  Not a current CP/not FERC approved

***********************

Great River Energy: Will have to get back to you on this. They usually act as
agent for another company and I am waiting to get info on what they want to
do.

Thanks,

Shari


Thanks!!


r at airport searched mothers carry on for 10 min found tweezers


I have another meeting at this time.  Can we reschedule or can I send someone else?

Stacey


In addition to the summary below, the agenda has the West-wide cap case on the agenda.

FERC has posted its agenda.  It is available at
http://cips.ferc.gov/Q\CIPS\MISC\CA\CA121901.000.TXT.

Here comes the Federal Regulatory Santa Claus?  FERC's agenda for its 12/19
meeting is incredibly ambitious and appears to have queued up a large swath
of high profile cases.  To speculate based upon the current, end-of-the-year
agenda, it appears that there will be orders regarding RTOs at center stage,
with a twist of congestion mitigation thrown in (?).  Interconnection issues
also come up, including the CA dockets.  There's also an order coming in the
California docket, but its not that clear whether this addresses the gross
load issue, outage coordination, the must-offer requirement, or some other
facet of the "market mitigation" docket.  RMR contract updates and the
various protests also come up for consideration.

ABB

Items of potential interest include:

E-1.     DOCKET#  EX02-7      000      Transmission Constraints

E-2.     DOCKET#  RM01-12     000      Electricity Market Design and
Structure

E-8.     DOCKET#  ER01-812    000      Geysers Power Company, LLC (RMR)
         OTHER#S  ER01-812    001      Geysers Power Company, LLC

E-9.     DOCKET#  ER02-198    000      Mirant Delta, LLC and Mirant Potrero,
LLC (RMR)

E-11.    DOCKET#  ER02-208    000      Pacific Gas and Electric Company
(RMR)

E-14.    DOCKET#  ER02-250    000      California Independent System
Operator
                                       Corporation (2002 unbundled GMC)

E-15.    DOCKET#  ER02-240    000      Duke Energy Oakland LLC (RMR)

E-16.    DOCKET#  ER02-236    000      Geysers Power Company, LLC (RMR)

E-23.    DOCKET#  RM02-1      000      Standardizing Generator
Interconnection
                                       Agreement and Procedures

E-24.    DOCKET#  ER99-3144   000      Alliance Companies, Ameren
Corporation,
                                       Union Electric Company, Central
                                       Illinois Public Service Company,
(RTO)

E-35.    DOCKET#  EL00-95     034      San Diego Gas & Electric Company v.
                                       Sellers of Energy and Ancillary
Services
                                       Into Markets Operated by the
California
                                       Independent System Operator and the
                                       California Power Exchange (Must
offer, outage coordination, gross load or market mitigation / refund case)

E-36.    DOCKET#  EL01-111    000      California Independent System
Operator
                                       Corporation (Market monitoring and
anticompetitive practices)

E-37.   DOCKET#   EL00-95     025      San Diego Gas & Electric Company
                                       v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary
Service (Generator interconnection procedures)

E-45.    DOCKET#  EL00-95     048      San Diego Gas & Electric Company v.
                                       Sellers of Energy and Ancillary
Service
                                       into Markets Operated by the
California
                                       Independent System Operator
Corporation
                                       and the California Power Exchange
         OTHER#S  EL00-95     049      San Diego Gas & Electric Company v.
                                       Sellers of Energy and Ancillary
Service
                                       into Markets Operated by the
California
                                       Independent System Operator
Corporation
                                       and the California Power Exchange
(Williams, et al cost justification)

E-47.    DOCKET#  EL01-68     000      Investigation of Wholesale Rates of
Public
                                       Utility Sellers of Energy and
Ancillary
                                       Services in the Western Systems
                                       Coordinating Council (cost
justification or CARE issue?)

E-48.    DOCKET#  EL00-95     045      San Diego Gas & Electric Company
                                       v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary
Service
                                       into Markets Operated by the
California
                                       Independent System Operator
Corporation
                                       and the California Power Exchange
(Refund case / PX settlement?)

E-50.    DOCKET#  ER01-1639   003      Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E
ETC?)

E-53.    DOCKET#  EL01-7      000      Pacific Gas and Electric Company v.
                                       Sunnyside Cogeneration Partners, L.P.
                                       RW Monterey, Inc., Ridgewood Electric
                                       Power Trust II and Ridgewood Power
LLC
         OTHER#S  QF91-50     000      Pacific Gas and Electric Company v.
                                       Sunnyside Cogeneration Partners, L.P.
                                       RW Monterey, Inc., Ridgewood Electric
                                       Power Trust II and Ridgewood Power
LLC (QF status)

E-54.    DOCKET#  EL01-80     001      National Grid USA
         OTHER#S  EC99-80     013      Alliance Companies, Ameren
Corporation,
                                       Union Electric Company, Central
                                       Illinois Public Service Company,
(RTO?)

E-62.    DOCKET#  ER99-3426   002      San Diego Gas & Electric Company

E-65.    DOCKET#  EL00-95     001      San Diego Gas & Electric Company v.
                                       Sellers of Energy and Ancillary
                                       Services into Markets Operated by
                                       the California Independent System
                                       Operator and the California Power
                                       Exchange (Market mitigation,
underscheduling penalties, everything?)

E-72.    DOCKET#  RM01-8      000      Revised Public Utility Filing
Requirements

M-1.    DOCKET# RM02-3      000       Accounting and Reporting of Financial
                                      Instruments, Comprehensive Income,
                                      Derivatives and Hedging Activities

G-15.    DOCKET#  RP00-241    000      Public Utilities Commission of the
                                       State of California v. El Paso
Natural
                                       Gas Company, El Paso Merchant
Energy-Gas,
                                       L.P. and El Paso Merchant Energy
Company

A-2.     DOCKET#  AD02-7      000       Customer Matters, Reliability,
Security
                                        and Market Operations

Andrew B. Brown
Ellison, Schneider & Harris, LLP
2015 H Street
Sacramento, CA  95814
Phone: (916) 447-2166
Fax: (916) 447-3512
mailto:abb@eslawfirm.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This communication and any accompanying document(s)
are confidential and privileged.  They are intended for the sole use of the
addressee.  If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.  Moreover, any such
inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
privilege as to this communication or otherwise.  If you have received this
communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.


Ross -

Have we signed a confidentiality agreement with Cargill?  I need to know for purposes of completing the letter for you.

Also, just so that we can keep track of the status of these matters, could you please request a letter from either me or Tana and we will prepare them.  This will enable use to keep files of the agreements and know what is going on.  It will also make the timing for initialing and signing faster as I will not have to review the agreements prior to initialiing them.

Thanks.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Mesquita, Ross
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Greenberg, Mark
Cc: Bridges, Michael
Subject: FW: Cargill letter

Mark,

Attached is a channel letter from PwC for Cargill.  It is the same letter that we used with them for Koch, except for the meeting date deadline has changed.  Please review and initial so that we can execute.

Thanks
Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: philip.greedy@us.pwcglobal.com
[mailto:philip.greedy@us.pwcglobal.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:52 PM
To: Bridges, Michael
Cc: patricia.guzman@us.pwcglobal.com; Mesquita, Ross
Subject: Cargill letter

Mike and Ross, here is a letter for Cargill. It's the same letter we have
used, except I changed the date to 11/30/2001 to contact them.
(See attached file: EOLletteragreement-Cargill-11-5-01.doc)

Thanks
Phil Greedy
713-356-5223

"Bridges, Michael" <Michael.Bridges@ENRON.com> on 10/23/2001 12:14:41 PM
To:   Patricia Guzman/US/MCS/PwC, Philip Greedy/US/MCS/PwC
cc:   "Mesquita, Ross" <Ross.Mesquita@ENRON.com>
Subject:  Potential Partners

I spoke with a few people in our organization.  As I feared, we have
already spoke with Oracle and Siebel.  That said, we are interested in
exploring other companies that you may have stong relationships with.
One company name that came up was Novell.

Thanks for the names, I am confident that we will find something.

Mike Bridges

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


email me back or just give me a call tonight.


So is Deerfield in Mississippi?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:51 AM
To: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com
Subject: Deerfield Development Review Committee Hearing - June 11th

fyi.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 08:50
AM ---------------------------

From: Steven Krimsky/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 08:47 AM

To:   Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Thode/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven
Rose/ENRON@enronXgate, Dave Kellermeyer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund Grube/ENRON@enronXgate, Lea
Sooter/ENRON@enronXgate, cabrera@pbworld.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
dsmith@edsaplan.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
currog@bellsouth.net@SMTP@enronXgate, gfhhai@msn.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
bernardkinney@aol.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
kabainc@bellsouth.net@SMTP@enronXgate,
redelstein@ensr.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
jessica@curtisrogers.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
charlotte@bitner.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
sosbourne@ensr.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
amontero@edsaplan.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
walter.bertschinger@mcmtrans.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:

Subject:  Deerfield Development Review Committee Hearing - June 11th

Please plan to attend the hearing next Monday the 11th at 1:00 pm at
Deerfield Beach City Hall.? Should everything go well, this will be the
only public hearing in Deerfield.

We will be getting with each of you regarding presentational material, etc.

Also, please plan to attend a pre-meeting at?Keith & Associates Monday at
10:00 am.

Regards,
Steve


See if she wants to meet with me when I get back.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/27/2000 05:28 PM -----

	Mary Alison Bailey@ECT
	09/22/2000 06:00 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Traci
Warner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Scott Porter/HOU/EES@EES,
Bernie Barcio/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John
Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bill Windle/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Spector/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pushkar
Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Waymon Votaw/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Dye/HOU/EES@EES, Jon Adler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg
Characklis/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Leib/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrew Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Stenhouse/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Trevor Randolph/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Charles Varnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alhamd
Alkhayat/NA/Enron@ENRON, Micha Makowsky/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Frank Bay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jaime
Gualy/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Michelle Juden/HOU/EES@EES, John Walt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew
Wilson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael C Bilberry/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Maskell/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kelli Little/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Gim/NA/Enron@Enron, Pearce W Hammond/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aamir
Maniar/NA/Enron@Enron, Abhijeet Naik/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rice Team to Review Resumes

Becky Bruce would like to meet on Sept. 28th from 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm in
EB11C2 to review resumes of candidates to be interviewed.  You are able to
access the resumes on the website (www.resumelink.com/grad  -   Jones School
-  Id  Rice Grads  -  password  cpcowls).  Hard copies will be available at
the meeting.

Please RSVP to Alison Bailey by return e-mail so that I can make sure the
room is large.

Thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 12:46 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:

http://www.stanford.edu/~wolak/


Carpenter is saying that prices went up due to manipulation, pure and simple,
we're saying that it's the reasons listed on the 1 1/2 pager that I sent.
Give a call and we can discuss further.

Best,
Jeff


I have an appointment at 1:00 today and should be back to the office sometime
between 2 - 2:30.

Thanks,
Stephanie


To:  Enron Corporate Policy Committee:

Please review the attached memo outlining business-wide cost saving opportunities.  Please forward any comments that you have to Suzanne Brown via email by close of business on Wednesday, June 6th.


Bruce:  I'm out of the office tomorrow but will be back Monday.  Let's talk
then please.  Sara

To: Lynn Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Pedro Henrique Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kent
Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward E
Graham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eduardo Camara/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, arcohen@skadden.com,
jschaub@skadden.com
Subject: Re: Millennium - UPDATE

Here is the update:

1. BONY is getting a legal opinion on the ADR issuance and is in contact with
Millenium's attorneys.

2. DKB has performed investigations on whether these ADRs must be restricted,
DKB's view is that they should not restricted.  This is highly arcane US SEC
law (so my summary is probably missing a lot of finer points), but my
understanding is that DKB views the sale of the local shares as a real sale,
with a public notice, a public underwritten auction etc,and there is nothing
restricted about the shares.  I don't think BONY would dispute that, but I
think their interpretation (and our legal view) is that the shares are
restricted because they are shares that were not registered with the SEC
under the original ADR issuance and, critically, they were sold by the
"Issuer".   That is, BONY's view is that BNDES is the same as Millenium b/c
they are both government entities--ie BNDES is the "Issuer".  Therefore,
regardless of the public nature of sale of the shares (and the fact that the
shares aren't restricted for trading locally in Brazil), the shares issued as
ADRs would be restricted per US law.

Now, ultimately we have to go with what BONY says b/c they issue the ADRs.
However, before we charge back to BONY and argue DKB's case, I would
appreciate a review by Skadden back to me on whether these shares if issued
as ADRs would be restricted.  We want unrestricted, NYSE ADRs if possible.

3. When the ADRs are issued, they will be issued to PEP, a Brazil company,
but deposited in one of the CayCo parents of PEP custody account.  We will
need to check Brazil law and revise our MS custody account accordingly to se
eif we can do this.  Sara, again I will try to call tomorrow, I apologize for
the delay.

4. The plan to move the ADRs out of Brazil is as follows. There will be no
sale and no cash movement.  There may be a CPMF.  PEP will perform an
"in-kind" capital reduction of the shares back to its CayCo parent.  This
will probably require some Brazil government approvals (or may not).  If so,
what are they and how long will they take?

5. Critically, we have been advised by Brazil legal and by US tax that the
shares if moved in this manner will move at the ORIGINAL COST BASIS.  IE,
there is no taxbale event for US or Brazil.  Lynn, please confirm.

6. I don't have a timetable yet, I will call BONY tomorrow for an update on
timing.

Regards,  Bruce

Lynn Aven
12/07/99 07:14 AM
To: Bruce Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Bruce Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pedro Henrique
Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kent
Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward E
Graham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eduardo Camara/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Millennium - ROBERT

The PEP Cayco parent is the appropriate entity to serve as custodian for the
ADR certificates.  PEP actually has two Cayman shareholders.  All the of the
certificates can be issued to the 99% shareholder.  I will address via a
separate message how the accounting entries need to be booked in order to
reflect the fact that the 1% shareholders received shares in the capital
reduction.

Lynn

	Enron International
	     Structuring Group

	From:  Bruce Harris                           12/06/99 05:59 PM

To: Bruce Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Pedro Henrique Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kent
Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn
Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward E
Graham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eduardo Camara/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Millennium - ROBERT

I spoke w/Theresa at BONY aand we have agreed on a fee of 1.5 cents per ADR.
That works out to a fee of $231,654.00 on 15,443,600 expected ADRs.  Kent,
who will handle the invoice from your group?  I emphasized that "time is of
the essence".

Robert, please call me tomorrow and we can get Gareth involved to help us
with all the issues.  Sara, I will also call you tomorrow to give you
background.

1. We will need to get in touch with our Brazil broker, who I assume is DKB
(Pedro, who and at what phone number?).

2. The broker will move our local shares to Banco Itau, the custodian bank.

3.  BONY will issue ADR certificates to a custodian/location that we
determine offshore (I think we would use PEP-Cayco parent, Lynn please
confirm company).

4. I think we will use MS as custodian (assuming account contemplates holding
physical, restricted securities--Sara, I will speak with you about this).

5. Theresa has calls in to Millenium to get "ok" and also is working to get
legal opinion issued on issuing restricted ADRs pursuant to original ADR
documentation (if I udnerstand the issue correctly).

6.  Once the shares are transferred, we will seek to do an "in-kind" capital
reduction at the PEP level up to its CayCo parent and hopefully avoid any
CPMF.  Also, we should be able to use original basis for both Brazil and US
tax and thus no tax impact, at leats this has been indicated to us.

Regards,  Bruce

	Enron International
	     Structuring Group

	From:  Bruce Harris                           12/03/99 07:29 AM

To: Pedro Henrique Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kent Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn
Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward E
Graham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Millennium - daily

Yes, BONY is getting back to me today with the cost to create the ADRs.
From  tax standpoint, Lynn has determined that if we move the shares via a
capital reduction, there will be no Brazil or US tax (other than perhaps a
CPMF) since we will move the shares at their original basis.  So the price
doesn't matter too much--but I don't want to take any chances with the Brazil
tax authorities.  Better to move the shares now when the price is pretty even
than to move it later when the price has doubled; it would be a tempting tax
target.

Regards,  Bruce

Pedro Henrique Oliveira

12/03/99 07:02 AM
To: Kent Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Lynn Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward E
Graham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Millennium - daily

Bruce is working with Robert and Lynn trying to create "special" ADR that
will not be listed.

Alternatively, specially if we are going to prepay Eletrobr?s' debt, we can
always trade some portions of the shares, on the stock exchange between Ernon
companies.  This method would take us some time to do all our position, but
the advantage is we would be creating listed ADRs.

Pedro

Kent Castleman
12/03/99 08:58 AM
To: Lynn Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pedro Henrique
Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward E
Graham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Millennium - daily

the sotck continues to run up - what happened to the project to move the
shares offshore?

Kent

---------------------- Forwarded by Kent Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
12/03/99 08:45 AM ---------------------------

Roberto Schloesser
12/02/99 08:13 PM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diomedes
Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward E
Graham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pedro Henrique
Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ricky Lynn
Waddell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie F
Estrems/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kent
Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Millennium - daily


Please send me a copy of the 9/20 memo.  Thanks,  Teb

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hass, Glen
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:15 PM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Lokey, Teb; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Kowalke, Terry; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Darveaux, Mary; Betancourt, Ramona ; Brown, Elizabeth; Hanagriff, Richard
Subject:	Order 637--Imbalance Provisions

Please plan to attend our next meeting on Order 637, Imbalance Provisions, on Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 9:00 AM in conference rooms 1336 (Houston) and 724 (Omaha).   We want to review our list of "Keeps" and "Trades" and also discuss our next steps.  If you need a copy of Lindy's Sept 20th memo with the list, let me know.  gh


Please see the attached article in the recent issue of Regulation, Volume 23,
Number 3, 2000:


Dear valued E*TRADE customer,

As a valued customer of E*TRADE, you have been selected to
participate in a customer satisfaction program, with the opportunity to give
E*TRADE your input and help them enhance the services you use with your
online trading.

Your participation is very important as E*TRADE is committed
to providing you with the best possible service.

With the help of Walker Information, a specifically designed
web-based research tool has been created to measure your opinions and
feelings about the products and services that E*TRADE provides to you. A
clear understanding of your needs will enable E*TRADE to identify areas
where they can better serve you.

The survey is detailed and may take as long as 20 to 30
minutes to finish.  Please choose a time that is convenient for you to
complete the survey in one sitting. If this is not possible, you can leave
the survey site and return at a more convenient time.

As a token of our appreciation, we will send you an E*TRADE
T-shirt upon completion of the survey. The survey site will close on
Tuesday, January 23rd, at  midnight EST. If you would like to participate
in the survey and receive a t-shirt, please be sure to complete your survey
by this time.

Below is a hyperlink to the website where you will find the
survey. Again, we would encourage you to complete the survey at a convenient
time and in one sitting.

In advance, thank you very much for your time and we greatly
appreciate your willingness to participate!

(Note: The web survey will run more efficiently when you do
not have other applications open during the time you are completing it.)

http://survey.walkerinfo.com/DTJNSPM

If you feel you have received notice of this opportunity in
error, please respond to this email and simply place the word "REMOVE" in
the Subject box.


As a reminder, today is the deadline for completion of the OPM Survey.  I am
including the body of the email sent Monday in this regards which includes
the reference document and the link to the survey.  Thanks for your help and
hard work in this matter.

OPM SURVEY EMAIL SENT EARLIER:

As communicated to you in an email dated September 19, 2000, we have
developed an easier and more efficient method of handling the Operations
Pricing Model hours survey using Microsoft Access.  The NEW & IMPROVED survey
is ready for your input for the month of September.

What to do:

1)  Attached is a reference document that lets you know the purpose of the
OPM Hours Survey, prerequisites to using the tool, helpful hints and contact
information.  Please open and read.

2)  Click on the attached link to access the OPM Survey.  Please select "OK"
at the warning message that appears and continue on to the database.  If you
have any questions/comments, please contact Suzanne Nicholie at Ext. 5-7341.

The OPM team is available to support you while using this new tool.  During
the next couple of days, one of the OPM team members will be contacting each
of you to see if you need help or have any questions.

We are asking for a quick turn around of the completion of the survey and
although it is month end, quarter end and the planning process is near
completion, please complete the OPM Survey using the database by end of day,
Friday, October 6.

Thanks,

James Scribner


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 11:38
AM ---------------------------

ANITAREED@aol.com on 07/18/2000 11:03:23 AM
To: Randall.L.Gay@enron.com
cc:
Subject: 2nd for Kathleen, Fwd: Islander

This is my response.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <ANITAREED@aol.com>
From: ANITAREED@aol.com
Full-name: ANITAREED
Message-ID: <cc.7782905.26a5b134@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:10:12 EDT
Subject: Re: Islander
To: Mkbass1@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 106

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the update.  Unfortunately, the Civic Club is unable to run the
article in The Islander, because of its political nature.  President Kathleen
Gay reviewed the article, as it was previously written, and advised me last
night that it is against Civic Club policy and bylaws to be involved in
political issues.

If you have questions or comments, please contact Kathleen.

Anita Reed


Dean,  Per Barry's request, attached is the amendment letter to be executed
by Petro Canada concerning the Kern River capacity letter agreement.  Please
forward to the appropriate individual.


I told Paul that you called him yesterday so abruptly because you didn't want
to waste his time while you got tests done for arthritis. I told him I told
you to call him back and at least hear what he has to say. He said they are
looking for people and based on what I told him an interview was a formality.

Chris


What do you want for Fred Taylor?


The continuing promises to reduce OOM requests by the NYISO would seem to be
nothing more than empty verbage. I am referring to the continued multitude
of OOM dispatches that are requested every day by either ConEd and the
NYISO.

Any request for generation OOM is bypassing the SCD dispatch algorithm. The
requests are so frequent that it makes one wonder if SCD is capable of
dispatching the system at all. Generation is consistently requested OOM into
any pickup hour whether in the morning or the evening, this can mean one of
two things either SCD is significantly flawed and cannot handle any system
condition in which the system is marginally stressed or that operator
intervention into the dispatch process is for price control and not for
system security.

The nebulous and overused rationale of "requested OOM for ISO or local
security" lacks detail and any rationale. An OOM request is a special
exception to the dispatch algorithm as afforded in the tariff to allow
resolution of a system condition that SCD cannot resolve. Since these
requests are requested so frequently you have to assume that SCD is
inherently flawed.

Yes the 138 KV modeling may go in service in the near future but will it
really reduce the OOM calls. ConEd has a carte blanche to load generation
whatever and whenever they want, even when it is not in their transmission
district (Roseton OOM dispatch). There is no justification required and
clearly it is in their economic interest to request generation OOM. Controls
and the capability to audit these requests are required to mitigate the load
server with 40% of the New York State load to cease and desist bypassing the
SCD dispatch algorithm.

The consistent use of the NYPA GTs, the Gilboa generators, etc. are a
consistent abuse of a loophole in the tariff that allow interference into
the system dispatch unchecked and without any published rationale. I would
only assume that if a generator abused the dispatch to the same extent they
would have been thrown in mitigation jail a long time ago.

Joe

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628650Q@lyris.nyiso.com


hey nicki-

i got back yesterday and am back at work, although i hesitate to call it that.  i had a good time back home, went thru my normal roller coaster of loving being back with my family, then feeling like i am going crazy and needing to leave the house for extended periods of time and then back to loving hanging out there.  caught up with lots of friends and in general did very little for 2 weeks, which felt ok.  it's been awhile since i've been away from my normal life for that long and it was refreshing.  it feels good to be back, too.

i hope you had a relaxing break and are feeling productive again.

cooper

p.s. my sister-in-law really liked her sweater and it fit perfectly.


Susan Holland
35 Todd Pond Road
Lincoln, MA 01773
Susan.Holland@MercerMC.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Susan Holland


Sara:

Per your request, please see attached.

Regards,

Anna Meytina

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meytina, Anna Confidential Memo-Counsel (Exchange)
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:05 AM
> To: 'Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com'
> Subject: Institutional Account Agreement
>
> Cheryl:
>
> Attached please find marked and clean copy of the Institutional Account
> Agreement.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Anna Meytina
>
>  <<IAA032701.doc>>  <<IAA032701-clean.doc>>

 - IAA032701.doc
 - IAA032701-clean.doc
***********************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


On Tuesday, March 7th, Tejas took gas from us at Oasis Katy and gave it back
to us at Tejas Laporte to help us out during an outage for $.02/mmbtu.  This
transaction has not been scheduled correctly.  There are two deal tickets in
Sitara to cover the Oasis portion of the deal:  #213145 covers ENA selling
the gas to HPLC for HPLC to transport on Tejas.  Deal #213370 covers the
transport usage on Tejas from Oasis Katy to Laporte.  I have edited this
ticket to add the $.02/mm charge.  There needs to be a Tejas expense contract
at Laporte, #665, to cover the approx. 25,000mm received there on the 7th.
These volumes are currently sitting on the Laporte OBA.

Jackie-  if you would work with Carlos he should be able to walk you through
getting this scheduled correctly in all systems.

Thanks.


I apologise for the delay in my response to your email.  Thank you for
contacting me regarding the rotational opportunity in your group.  While it
sounds intriguing, I will not be able to pursue it as I have already begun my
second rotation with ENA.  However, I would appreciate the opportunity to
learn more about your group and any possible future rotations.  Please let me
know if you would be able to meet at some later date.  Thank you again.

Jackson Vo@EES
04/27/2000 04:15 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rotation Opportunity

Susan,

I received your resume from the analyst/associate pool and understand that
you will be rotating soon.  I'm a manager for EES Europe looking for an
analyst to be  based in Houston who can join within the next two months.  If
you have an interest in discussing this opportunity, please call me so that
we can set-up a time to talk.

Jackson Vo
(853-4756)

http://axis.enron.com
Job ID 152


Thank you, dahling, for the lovely card.  I'm thinking of you as well (but I
ALWAYS think of you).  I'll be thinking of you when I am in New York and
especially when I pass by Ferragamo.  And when I pass by Tiffany's.  I hope
your day is filled with valentines.  Love,  Sas