Gentlemen -

Now I have to take it all back.

The GOM called Ken Lay and asked for a 24 hours reprieve on the GOM Guarantee
demand.  Ken agreed to give them the reprieve.  While we had already served
it and received an acknowledged receipt, we will take the demand back, give
them back the receipt and wait for 24 hours.

Bruce

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/08/2001 10:31 AM ---------------------------

Bruce Lundstrom
01/08/2001 08:56 AM
To: Stephanie Harris@ENRON, Mark E Haedicke@ECT
cc: Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Dabhol - An Update on Legal Efforts

Gentlemen -

We are currently in the processing of serving/delivering the GOM Guarantee
demand and the PPA Meet and Discuss Letter.  Ken Lay approved the delivery in
a conference call this morning.  Our attention will then turn to the GOI
Guarantee demand (can be served a week from today), the Notice of Arbitration
under the GOM Guarantee and anticipation of injunctive relief being sought by
our counterparties to stay any arbitration and collection/payment on the
guarantees.

We are scheduled to meet with the lenders in NY tomorrow.

Bruce

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/08/2001 08:54 AM ---------------------------

Bruce Lundstrom
01/05/2001 01:57 PM
To: Stephanie Harris@ENRON, Mark E Haedicke@ECT
cc: Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Dabhol - An Update on Legal Efforts

Jim/Mark -

I know that Rob has been keeping you generally apprised, but I thought that I
would update you both on the quickly evolving Dabhol situation.

The commercial situation at Dahbol Power Company is deteriorating pretty
rapidly.  MSEB is now approx. 45 days late on payment in full of the October
invoice.  They have paid only a relatively modest portion of that bill.
Payment on the November bill is about 15 days late.  The MSEB Chairman says
that MSEB can't pay these invoices.

At present, the Governments of Maharashtra and India are refusing to engage
in a constructive dialogue on solving the non-payment issue and the 1400 MW
that will come on line as part of Phase II.  They say that they recognize
their obligations as guarantors of MSEB's obligations but are not interested
in helping in any different capacity (e.g., GOI buys some or all of Phase II).

Until just a few days ago, the lead India bank was refusing to fund even
their own ongoing interest obligation.  At present, they are refusing to
continue funding any other Phase II draw request.  The India banks have a
great deal to lose and, in our opinion, should strongly consider continuing
to fund Phase II.  It would seem that the lead India bank is scared, knaive
or, worse yet, very pessimistic about Dabhol's future -- perhaps there are
other reasons for their current position.

We are meeting with the international banks in NY on Tuesday.  Our main goal
is to convince them to continue to fund and to use their influence to have
the India banks do the same.

The current India legal crisis team is nearly identical to the 1995 India
legal crisis team.  The same law firms and lawyers (both Indian and
international) are continuing to play much the same roles.

We have not identified any particular "holes" in Dabhol's legal position.
While the India newspapers have offered up various theories that might allow
MSEB to cancel the PPA (frustration of purpose, etc.), none seem compelling.
No counterparty has offered up any of these theories directly to DPC.

In the short term, we are preparing (1) a demand under the GOM guarantee and
(2) a "meet and discuss" letter under the PPA.  The current plan is to serve
these next week.  We are also preparing (3) an arbitration notice under the
GOM guarantee, (4) a demand under the GOI guarantee and (5) an action against
MERC.  MERC is the Maharashtra Energy Regulatory Commission.  They have
issued "orders" over the last year limiting the amount of power that MESB
buys from Dabhol.  We do not believe that they have jurisdiction to do so.
We may or may not ultimately file this action.

Let me know if I can provide any further information.

Bruce


Zimin,

Ammonia prices for Bob Lee.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000
02:00 PM ---------------------------

Cuthbert Roberts@ENRON
06/05/2000 09:21 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Ammonia Prices

Vince,

The attached are the 10 year historical prices for ammonia.

Cuthbert Roberts


Attached is the latest markup on the warranty language which GE is now
reviewing.  I also have a few comments from John Rigby which may be worth
adding but I suggest we hold off until we discuss the warranty language with
GE next week.

I also spoke to Steve Swift who indicated that he would Email to Sheila what
has been agreed to on indemnity, LOL, ect. and what we intend to insert into
the Arcos contract.  FYI I do not intend to use the "end world hunger"
warranty language in the Arcos contract as I want GE back-to-back on what we
have signed up to with the owner under the EPC contract.

Regards,

Scott


Hi Kevin,

Thanks for your email.

Only Referrals that were initiated on the Referral Station would have tracking information available online.  My company, Referral Networks, hosts Enron's Referral Station website.

For Referrals that were made prior to the online system being live (May 18th), you would need to contact the Employee Referral Manager at Enron to answer your questions.

Whatever avenue you used before to check on your Referrals, I would still use for this particular one, since it was made in the past, prior to our live date.

If you have questions, you might try the Enron Recruitment Technology Help Desk at 713-345-3254, select option #2.

I hope this answers your question.  If you have any future questions about using the online Referral Station, please let us know.

Thanks,

Referral Networks Customer Support

--Original Message--

In April 2001 I submitted a candidate (Ms. Stacy Fitzgerald) for two
jobs (#107960 and #108040).  I also spoke with the hiring supervisor,
Mr. Derryl Cleaveland regarding the candidate and the positions.  Stacy
was subsequently interviewed for 108040 and began working for Enron on
May 7, 2001.

My referral submission was on paper, not electronically.  Am I eligible
for the finders fee?  I could not find anything on the Tracking part of
the web site.

thanks for the help.
Kevin Hyatt
713-853-5559


Wes, several months ago I sent you a memo (which I have attached to this
E-mail for ease of reference) describing that the State of Texas had notified
the Tax Department that it intended to audit the tax returns for Risk
Management & Trading Corp. ("RMT") for  the 1998 through 2000 tax years.
Greg, this is the legal entity about which I spoke to you several months ago
and of which you serve as its Senior Management.  We were recently notified
by the State of Texas that it had completed its audit and review of RMT's
returns and that NO ADJUSTMENTS would be proposed.  As I outlined in my
earlier memo to Wes, the RMT arrangement has increased earnings of Enron by
approximately$30 million since 1997.  The Tax Department is extremely proud
of our defense of Enron's interests in this matter and I would be delighted
to speak with you about this should you desire.  Best regards.  SHD.


Effectively immediately Fed Ex has suspended all outbound service. All outbound packages should be shipped via UPS.


Just an FYI, if you want to alter procedures in production already, you can use the command Alter Procedure, instead of Create Procedure.  Everything else would be as you have it in your scripts.  All it does is change the code of the procedure without touching dependencies or permissions.  I'll change that in these so that you don't have to.

Thanks, :)

Chris Wiebe
Staff, Data Technologies
Enron Canada Corp.
Phone: (403) 974-6929
Cell: (403) 650-7224
Pager: (403) 212-9989
Pager email: chriswiebe@epagenet.net
Email: Chris.Wiebe@Enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richey, Cooper
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:48 PM
To:	Wiebe, Chris
Subject:	development stored procs to prod

can you update the following procs in prod with these scripts while (maintain existing set of permissions?

 << File: sp_poolprice.sql >>  << File: sp2.sql >>  << File: sp3.sql >>
thx,
cooper


<<MidC.xls>> Resending to sytems problems last night.

 - MidC.xls


Shawn,

What about Tuesday or Wednesday?

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Cumberland, Shawn" <Shawn.Cumberland@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:43 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Lunch

Vince

When can we do lunch again?

shawn
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Attached is clean and redlined version of the Misako letter agreement with
revisions.  Please review and if ok have Misako execute.


Please open the attached file to read the complete text of the following
items:

04:13PM EDT 14-SEP-00 DEUTSCHE BANC ALEX. BROWN (E. KLAUER/R. SEYMORE) AMD
AMD: AMD: COMPANY IS EXECUTING ACCORDING TO PLAN -- REITERATE BUY RATING

03:24PM EDT 14-SEP-00 BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH GROUP  (STEVENS, JAY P.)
BUCKINGHAM REDUCES RATING ON SCI FROM STRONG BUY TO ACCUMULATE

10:15AM EDT 14-SEP-00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY (RICHARD GARDNER) AAPL
PC MARKET UPDATE

08:25AM EDT 15-SEP-00 CIBC WORLD MARKETS CORP. (M. EISENSTAT) ORCL
ORCL: STRONG Q1 EPS START THE FY01 OFF WITH A BANG

10:08AM EDT 15-SEP-00 PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES (K.ALEXY) IBM WDC DSS
PRUDENTIAL  HOSTED DATA STORAGE TOUR- DAY 2 HIGHLIGHTS

 <<09.15.00 Analyst Reports.doc>>

The analyst reports provided are reports prepared by independent analysts
who monitor and track Compaq's performance.  These reports are not prepared
by or at the direction of Compaq and as a result, Compaq is not endorsing or
verifying the information contained in these reports or endorsing any of
these analysts.   These reports are being provided solely for business
reasons and as a result, do not distribute these reports to other
individuals outside of Compaq.  If other individuals are interested in
receiving the reports provided herein, please contact Elizabeth Davis in
Compaq's Investor Relations Department at elizabeth.davis@compaq.com.

Elizabeth Davis
Compaq - Investor Relations
Research Analyst
281-518-4289

 - 09.15.00 Analyst Reports.doc


You can put John as your primary and me as  your secondary.

Stacey

-----Original Message-----
From: Law, Samantha
Sent: Mon 10/8/2001 3:38 PM
To: Nommensen, Dave; White, Stacey W.
Cc:
Subject: RE: Request Submitted: Access Request for samantha.law@enron.com

Hi Dave,

Yes, you are right, I just changed that intentionally in the second request, just to hope that the request doesn't go to you before it got approved by her. It seems like this still went to you even before she approved it.

Stacey,

So should I have put you or Dave as the primary approver for my request?

Thanks,
Samantha

-----Original Message-----
From: Nommensen, Dave
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 1:30 PM
To: Law, Samantha
Subject: FW: Request Submitted: Access Request for
samantha.law@enron.com

Samantha,

Looks like this one went to Stacey, with me as her backup.
You might want to ask Stacey who should be primary/secondary approver for your requests.

Thanks, d.n.

-----Original Message-----
From: ARSystem [<mailto:ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>]
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Nommensen, Dave
Subject: Request Submitted: Access Request for samantha.law@enron.com

You have received this email because the requester specified you as their Manager's alternate. Please click <http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000066118&Page=Approval> to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000066118
Approver            : stacey.w.white@enron.com
Request Create Date : 10/8/01 3:19:27 PM
Requested For       : samantha.law@enron.com
Resource Name       : Enpower North America West Production Table_Edit
Resource Type       : Applications


Dear JASON WOLFE,

Congratulations on opening your Ameritradec account!
You,re well on your way to becoming a self-directed
investor.

Your account opening bonus, "13 Steps to Investing
Foolishly" by the Motley Foolc is waiting for you.
To download your FREE copy, simply click on the link
below and follow the instructions that appear on your
screen.http://www.ameritrade.com/html/13steps.fhtmlOnce again,
congratulations and thank you for
choosing Ameritrade.

Ameritrade, it,s how you get somewhere on Wall
Street.(sm)

Member SIPC.  Ameritrade is a registered service mark
of Ameritrade Holding Corporation. Copyright (c) 2001
Ameritrade, Inc. All rights reserved. The Motley
Foolc is a registered trademark of The Motley Fool,
Inc. (C)13 Steps to Investing Foolishly is a
copyright of The Motley Fool, Inc.
ATI 798 E-M 03/01

[IMAGE]


She doesn't know that I exist,  now that I'm single again and all.  I should
be able to lose 30 or 40 pounds by then.

Matthew B Fleming@EES
01/31/2001 02:13 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Flight Info

Could you please pick her up and entertain her that weekend, I will be too
busy.  Sorry for the inconvenience, I owe you one.
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES on 01/31/2001
02:11 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Heidi Griffith                           01/31/2001 02:08 PM
	Phone No: (614)718-6340

To: Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Flight Info

Well the tickets have been purchased.  We arrive at the Hobby, TX airport at
10:45 am on Friday, Mar. 16 flight # 1451.  We will be departing on Monday,
March 19 at 10:55 am.  You have to promise me that we can eat at Lupe's
Friday night!!


With the Holiday Season and a New Year upon us, I would like to take this
opportunity to thank each of you for the contributions you,ve made this year
to the success of Enron Transportation Services Company and Enron.  Your hard
work and dedication continue to add value across the Enron organization.

I hope that you and your family have a Happy Holiday and a safe New Year.


Thanks for the update.  In the US we have a non conforming DASH  (Deas
Approval SHeet) that has to be signed by either Mike or me regardless of
commitment.  I'd like you, Brent and Alan to determine the best way to
standardize US and Europe DASH processes.  Mike or I will sign all EGM
business worldwide.  Thanks.

Jeff

Robert Quick
01/03/2001 09:48 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Global Markets - transaction approval process

I am an Enron Europe lawyer dealing with Enron Global Markets business out of
London. In Enron Europe we use what is known as a CACS form for approval of
non-standard deals. I attach a copy of the current form together with an
email from Mark Evans, General Counsel for Enron Europe.

I wonder whether for EGM business you wd want to modify the CACS form; for
example, under the standard European CACS if the deal involves a commitment
of  GBP 3 million or more, either Michael Brown or John Sherriff needs to
sign. It may be more appropriate for EGM deals for either of you to sign
(unless you are happy to allow the European Office of the Chairman to sign)
with a different (possibly USD denominated) threshold.

I would be grateful for your thoughts

Robert

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Quick/LON/ECT on 03/01/2001 15:42
---------------------------

Mark Evans
03/01/2001 15:13
To: ECT Europe Legal
cc:

Subject: CACS FORM: IMPORTANT INFORMATION

The CACS form is becoming an ever more significant tool, not only to manage
legal risk within Enron Europe, but also to enable our middle office
departments to capture new transactions promptly and ensure adequate
transactional information flow.

With this in mind, the CACS form has had further minor changes made to it and
is to be found at:

S:\legal\CACS form.

Please ensure you use the form at this location at all times henceforth. Do
not save it into your own directories, as further changes will be put through
on this form only in future. No changes are to be made to this form please
(in particular to the named signatories) without my agreement.

Please read the notes on the second page of the CACS form and then adhere to
the process set out there. This is particularly important because many of the
commercial teams are not reading these and then appear to be getting
differing explanations of the process from us. Some of the support units in
particular are unhappy that A1 is not being complied with, leaving them with
inadequate time to review contracts.

I am always happy to improve the form, especially if it simplifies, so
suggestions are welcome.

Two things which will happen are:

- adapted forms of the CACS will be produced for EES, Enron Global Markets
and (until divested) Enron Wind. In the meantime if lawyers working on
transactions within those divisions believe the proforma CACS needs to be
changed to accomodate the needs of those divisions, please let me know. Mary
Nell: I believe that EBS already has its own independent contract sign off
process. Let me know if that is not correct.

- the CACS system will be automated - probably on the workflow system as per
the new billing system. The idea is that at the earliest opportunity in the
life of a contract, the CACS relating to that contract is put on the system
which automatically alerts signatories that they should be looking out for
drafts. Draft contracts will be able to be circulated through the system. The
signing process will also be simplified.

Thanks for your attention.

        Mark


We have received an executed financial Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   October 23, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Power Authority of the State of New York

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of: Pulp,
Lumber & Paper, Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Choice of Law:   New York

For those of you keeping track, this brings us to 470 executed financial
agreements!


Market Participants:

Please assure that this Notification is forwarded to your respective
Operating Departments for Review ---

Notification of Operating Procedure Update

* The following new or revised ISO Operating Procedures have been
implemented and are posted for reference on the ISO Website.
* Please find them at
http://www1.caiso.com/thegrid/operations/opsdoc/index.html under the
appropriate Operating Procedure section heading.

ISO Operating Procedure posted:  E-511 Emergency Load Reduction Program
Version: 1.0
Effective Date: 6/15/2000
Procedure Purpose: This Operating Procedure describes the Demand Relief
Program that has been implemented by the ISO on a trial basis for the Summer
2000 time period. This Program is intended to provide an additional level of
Demand reduction on the system that can be implemented during a Stage 1
Emergency in an effort to avoid more severe emergency conditions.
Changes / Reasons: This is a new procedure

NOTE:  E-511 attachments A, B, C, D, & E contain market sensitive
information and will not be published.

If you have any questions, please e-mail the 'Procedure Control Desk'
mailbox at procctrldesk@caiso.com and we will respond as soon as possible.

Thank-You,

Operations Support and Training


On 7/29/00 the compressor went down for HPL deliveries into Eastrans.  3486
MMbtu was delivered on 7/29/00.  Redeliveries for the 29th will be 3486 into
HPL
from FCV.  The differential of 7800 MMBtu - 3486 MMBtu = 4314 MMBtu will be a
sale into HPL.

On July 30th, 31st and August 1st there is 0 gas flow.  7800 MMBtu per day
will
be sold into HPL.


Nick,

I would like 3 red poinsettias.

Thanks,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hiemstra, Nick
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Murphy, Melissa Ann; Piwetz, Stephanie; Thompson, Kerri; Metoyer, Evelyn; Hundl, Kimberly; Denton, Rhonda L.; Cason, Sharen; Theriot, Kim S.; Reeves, Leslie; Evans, Casey; White, Stacey W.; Dahlke, Andrea; Kroll, Heather; Emmons, Suzette; Piazze, Tara; Cross, Edith; Roberts, Chaun; Compean, Karla; Reyes, Pauline; Albrecht, Kristin; Day, Amanda
Subject:	Poinsettias

The Bayou City Dance Company is once again selling poinsettias as a fundraiser.  This is the dance company for 10-18 year olds for which my wife, April, is the Director.  They are selling the poinsettias for $8.50 each and they are pretty good size (about 12-18 inches tall from what I remember).  Just like last year, I will deliver the flowers to the Enron building (or at least to the Enron garage).

They come in red, white, or pink, but I think the red were by far the healthiest and longest lasting.

The order are due by next Friday, so please let me know if you would like to order (and how many).

Thanks.

- Nick


Wow.  Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
10:07 AM ---------------------------
From: Doug Leach on 11/13/2000 07:19 AM
To: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Wayne Perry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd
Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: DPC Fuel Management

Joe Sutton is gone so now you are going to have to play fair and per the
contract. I have tried on numerous occasions to resolve this issue with you
and Dan Rogers and you have stonewalled me every time. I would be glad to
talk about it in San Antonio, but you are not going to dictate the terms of
the transition of the DPC FMA.

Rick Bergsieker@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/10/2000 04:44 AM
To: Wayne Perry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Doug Leach@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
Subject: Re: DPC Fuel Management

Dpoug:  I don't understand this---let's discuss and resolve this in San
antonio.  What has changed?

Wayne Perry
11/09/2000 01:49 AM
To: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: DPC Fuel Management

Can we see if we can clear this up in San Antonio.
---------------------- Forwarded by Wayne Perry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/09/2000 01:49 AM ---------------------------

Todd Peterson
11/08/2000 03:51 PM
To: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wayne
Perry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: eric.gonzales@enron.com

Subject: DPC Fuel Management

Doug Leach call me  this morning and told me that the offer that he made to
the LNG group 6 months ago is now off the table. He said that this has also
been transmitted to Mike McConnell in writing. His reason was that he had
bent over backwards to make the proposal originally and the LNG group has
been slow to respond. I reminded him that we were delayed in getting back
because of some legal issues but now that we were all part of EGM that this
was no longer an issue. He went on to say that he will not turn over any of
the fees until phase 2 kicks in, some time next year (Marc de La Roche said
something to me the other day about Jan.01). That the LNG group will have to
bear all expenses until that time just like EFI had to for liquid fuels. He
did say that in their case India did reimburse them on their previous
expenses as a reduction/credit to the fee. He also went on to say that he was
not happy with India's attempt to get a piece of EFI's fee.
Please advise how you would like me to proceed.

TP


Please find attached posting for the 11,000 mmbtu for Bloomfield to Cal Border.  Make any necessary changes.

TK


Bill and Ed:

Here's an update:

- Enserco Energy has renewed their LC.  I should be getting a faxed copy shortly and bill will receive the original.
- Kim Theriot confirmed that there are no outstanding trades with Simpson Tacoma Kraft Company.
- Leslie Reeves confirmed that there are no outstanding amounts due by Metromedia Energy.  Has anyone found the LC?  I have asked Kim T. to locate the trade docs.
- Leslie Reeves confirmed that The Energy Authority closed out their positions with ENA.
- Energy Production Corp.'s LC automatically renews  for 1 year periods unless we received a notice from Chase of its intention not to renew 90 days prior to expiration.

Is all of this info consistent with credit's records?

That leaves Niagra Mohawk Energy Marketing, El Paso Electric, Rising Star Energy LLC and LG&E Energy Marketing.  Out of those CP's, only LG&E owes us a payment.  I am waiting to hear back from Leslie regarding payments owed by Niagra and Rising Star.   I have asked Kim to sends me the trading docs from Niagra.

Alan Aronowitz is working with someone in credit or settlements on the Vitol LC.

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-3393 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Group,

When doing an import or an export from California there are a few important
guidelines to remember.

IMPORT-This must be FIRM.  A firm import is required so that we provide the
spinning reserves to California (we do this by buying firm energy for the
import).  If the import is non-firm, California will charge us their price
for spinning reserve margins.  This could easily be $400 per mw come this
summer.

EXPORT-This must be NON-FIRM.  A non-firm export allows us to provide
spinning reserves to our bilat trading partners (or to simply sell the energy
without spinning reserves as "non-firm"), and NOT have to pay the California
price for spinning reserve margins.  Conversely if we do a firm export, we
would have to pay for California to supply spinning reserves.  And because
California will sometime use actual purchased energy for spinning reserves,
this could easily be $400 per mw this summer.
California has also proposed cutting firm exports this summer, so a "firm"
export does not imply that the energy would actually be exported anymore than
nonfirm.

IF you have other questions.  Please let me know.

Thanks,
Bill


Dear Medicine Bow Shipper:

This morning we received FERC approval for the third tie-in segment (to gate
#8) contracted  for  79 Mdth/day.  The contract effective date will be
October 12, but you will be able to utilize this capacity as soon as we have
it set up in the system today.  Additionally, we filed for approval of the
next segment (to gate #7) yesterday and will notify you once we have
approval.

Please call me if you have any questions today, or call Craig Coombs at
719-520-4387 tomorrow or Friday as I will be out those days, back in the
office Monday.

Laine Lobban
719-520-4344
719-331-3379

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041820.txt


Peter:
Are you handlig these matters or should we be involved?  Please call me or
Sara when convenient.  Thanks.
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 11/09/99 08:58
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  John Suttle                           11/08/99 04:54 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Canadian Memo

Rob,

The following is an update on the ongoing situations with some of the
Canadian counterparties that have recently changed their corporate
structures.  Clearly there are some issues that should be discussed regarding
the approach Enron should take moving forward.  On some issues, we are at a
point that decisions need to be made on whether or not to begin exercising
our contractual rights.  Other issues remain to be resolved within Credit,
and I expect these to be resolved within the next week.

Please call me to discuss any questions you might have with the following.

1) Dominion Energy Inc. acquired Remington Energy Ltd. in April 1999.
Remington operates as a wholly owned subsidiary under Dominion Energy Inc.
and has a Master Physical under which its deals have been confirmed.  It has
failed on each of the financial MAC covenants in the contract.  Repeated
efforts have been made to obtain a parent guaranty from Dominion including
conversations that have taken place with both commercial and credit
contacts.  Nonetheless, the counterparty to date has been unresponsive to
guaranty inquiries.  In the past few weeks, repeated phone calls to our
Dominion contacts have not been returned.  Current mark-to-market exposure
for Remington is approximately $9MM USD.

2) Marathon Canada Ltd., a wholly owned sub of Marathon Oil Company (BBB-),
acquired Tarragon  Oil and Gas Ltd. in August 1998.  Marathon Canada Ltd. is
a private company and requested a confidentiality agreement prior to its
providing financial statements.  Enron delivered the CA in July 1999 and
Marathon provided unaudited financials November 4.  Tarragon has a Master
Physical in place and has MACd on its covenants as a result of not providing
financial statements.  The financial statements provided need to be discussed
in further detail with the counterparty.  A request for parent guaranty from
Marathon Oil Company may be the final option prior to calling for
collateral.  Total exposure to the combined entity is $13.5MM USD.

3) Talisman Energy Inc. acquired both Rigel Oil and Gas Ltd. and Highridge
Exploration Ltd.  We have transactions confirmed under a Master Swap and a
Master Physical with Highridge,  a Master Physical and a Master Swap with
Talisman, and a Master Physical with Rigel.  Talisman has agreed to assign
all outstanding deals to the existing master contracts we have in place with
Talisman Energy Inc.  As soon as possible, we need legal to draft paper to
Talisman moving the outstanding deals under the Rigel and Highridge contracts
to the Talisman contracts.  In the same letter, Talisman has agreed to
terminate the Rigel and Highridge contracts.  In return, credit has agreed to
review the collateral thresholds and credit terms in the existing Talisman
contracts.  Talisman has its third quarter financials available this Friday.
By the end of next week we should be able to send the letter to Talisman with
amendments, transaction transfers, and Rigel/Highridge contract
terminations.  Combined exposure for the entities is approximately $30MM USD.

4) Renaissance Energy Ltd. amalgamated Pinnacle Resources Ltd.  We have one
deal on the books, but no contracts with Renaissance. We have a long term
deal confirmed under a Master Swap and a long term deal confirmed under a
Master Physical with Pinnacle.  Pinnacle does not want to move the existing
Renaissance deal under the Pinnacle master agreement.  It appears as though
Renaissance is finalizing a sale of assets that will include some Pinnacle
properties.  If they sell the Pinnacle properties underlying our deals, they
said they would probably assign the outstanding deals and contracts to the
purchaser (presumably after obtaining Enron approval for such).
Renaissance's current corporate structure automatically obligates Renaissance
to the obligations of Pinnacle and the resulting exposure under the two
contracts.   Combined exposure for these entities is $13MM USD.  A credit
review on Renaissance will be conducted within the next week.

5)  Devon Energy Corporation acquired Northstar Energy Corporation in
December 1998.  Northstar continues to operate as a wholly owned subsidiary,
has an executed Master Physical, and it has MACd on each of its covenants.
There is approximately $9.3MM USD mark to market exposure with Northstar.
Northstar has had several counterparties request a parent guaranty, but has
not offered any to date.  Devon offers limited financial information on its
Canadian operations in its 10-K, but exclusive Northstar data is not
provided.  We have sent Northstar our preferred form of guaranty, and they
have been unresponsive to subsequent phone calls.


Chris,  Sorry for delay.  We plan on making a decision a getting back with
the candidates no later than April 6th.

	"Christopher Knudsen" <christopher_knudsen@hotmail.com>
	03/27/2001 04:40 PM

		 To: gerald.nemec@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Summer Clerkship

Mr. Nemec,
?
???? My name is Chris Knudsen and? I? interviewed with you on Thursday, March
15th in respect to the Summer Clerkship position at Enron.? I am now trying
to solidify?my summer plans,?as well as studying for finals, and I was
wondering when I might find out about the position for this summer?? I would
greatly appreciate hearing?from you.
?
Thanks again for the opportunity?of speaking with you on the?15th.?
?
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????? Sincerely,
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????? Chris Knudsen
?
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????3210 Ashmont Ln.
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????Missouri City, Texas 77459
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????? (713) 557-5212

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Hello,

I am applying for the Power trader position offered in the monster.com. I have 1- year experience working as a real time power trader.
Please find my resume attached for additional information.

Thanks,
Monika Causholli


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 20, 2001 5:00pm through April 23, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:        ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/20/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  8:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 4/20/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  6:00:00 AM PT
	Fri 4/20/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  2:00:00 PM London
Outage:  SysAdmiral Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  SysAdmiral Users
Purpose: SysAdmiral terminal server icons on General Cluster will not be available due to maintenance.
Once the maintenance is completed the icons will point to the new 2.3.11 production and development environments.
Backout:  None
Contact(s):  Rusty Cheves  713-345-3798

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:       SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Hi Tax Gurus,

Here comes another turbine transaction similiar to CA Development and Salmon
Energy.  This one is with NorthWestern.  I need to run some tax stuff by you,
so here 'tis.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/06/2001 12:09
PM ---------------------------

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/06/2001 11:35:00 AM
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: LLC Agreement compared to original draft

Kay-attached is the LLC Agreement compared against the draft we originally
sent to NorthWestern (as opposed to the draft sent to us by its counsel).
The purpose of this version is so that Enron tax can concentrate on the
changes made to the tax provisions.

Regards

John L. Keffer
King & Spalding
713 751 3255
713 751 3280 (fax)
jkeffer@kslaw.com

 <<2XN4RED.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2XN4RED.DOC


This e-mail was mistakely sent to the "other" Mark Schroeder in Omaha.  In
any event, given our discussion yesterday, do we really want to be jumping
through hoops for this Indonesian gas firm.  Jane Wilson did mention to me
yesterday that we were pursuing a JV.  Is that off or likely to be put off,
given our narrowed focus in Asia/Southeast Asia?   thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 09/02/2000
13:45 ---------------------------

Mark A Schroeder@ENRON
09/02/2000 13:39
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Regulatory/Commercial Advice Needed by PGN/Indonesia

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark A Schroeder/NPNG/Enron on 02/09/2000
07:39 AM ---------------------------

David Merrill@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/09/2000 07:33 AM
To: Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Adair@ECT,
Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, J3NG@aol.com, Repit
Suliyono/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marshall Burchard@ECT (bcc:
Mark A Schroeder/NPNG/Enron)

Subject: Regulatory/Commercial Advice Needed by PGN/Indonesia

PGN requires the following soonest:

1.   Our comments on their draft Gas Transportation Agreement for
     delivery of gas to Singapore.   Draft GTA  being DHLed to you
      by our Jakarta office.  They will be supplying some 350MMCF/day
      to Singapore by 2002.  They need to finish this document this month.
      They request us to make suggested changes directly on the
      text with comments and explanations shown in the margins.

2.   Any papers we have summarizing the principles of gas transportaton
     agreements -- including cross-border agreements.

3.  Laws/language on third party access to pipelines from other
     countries (along with their pros and cons).  They
      need this to help them draft the thrid party access provisions
      for the new Oil and Gas law on which comments are due shortly.

Following is being sent to you by DHL:

4   Copies of the training program on regulatory affairs done for PGN by
     NERA last May.  [confidential].   This is so you and Jane will know
     what PGN already has been taught and not to go over the same ground.

5.   Copies of the advice on a regulatory regime for gas provided to PGN
     by NERA in 1997 (confidential).

DM


Slow browser may need to wait 15 seconds for your email to appear, then scroll to view. mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-1012129L@relay.netatlantic.com to unsubscribe enerfaxdaily as: fermis@enron.com forward to web@enerfax.com
If your email does not support this web version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com <mailto:subscribe@enerfax.com> Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by clicking <http://www.enerfax.com>

If you received this in error or no longer wish to subscribe click this link mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-1012129L@relay.netatlantic.com or forward to web@enerfax.com


Matthew Bender's Collier Bankruptcy Manual 3rd Revised Ed. comes in 3 volumes ($519.00).  We get 50% discount because we subscribe to internet version of Collier on Bankruptcy, 15th Edition Revised (http://www.bender.com/).  Collier Bankruptcy Manual is a compact desk edition of Collier on Bankruptcy, 15th Edition Revised, the preeminent bankruptcy law treatise. The new, completely revised edition of the Manual incorporates many of the new features and enhancements that were added to Collier on Bankruptcy.

You may consider :  Collier Bankruptcy Manuals Package on CD-ROM.  $465.50
Title(s) in this CD-ROM product:
	 Collier Bankruptcy Manual, Third Ed. Revised <http://bookstore.lexis.com/bookstore/catalog?action=product&prod_id=10116>
	 Collier Forms Manual, Third Edition Revised <http://bookstore.lexis.com/bookstore/catalog?action=product&prod_id=10789>
	 Collier Pamphlet Edition, 2001 Edition <http://bookstore.lexis.com/bookstore/catalog?action=product&prod_id=10236>

Advantages:

All three titles in one CD vs 9 books.
In the case where a section of the code cited, CD-ROM products provides hyperlink to the code.
You may download the forms to MS Word from Forms Manual.

Cover image of "Collier Bankruptcy Manuals Package (CD-ROM)"
List Price:	 $931.00
 	Publisher:	 Matthew Bender
ISBN:	 082052574X

Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775


Jason,

Thanks

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sokolov, Jason
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:35 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J.
Subject:	Power prices

Vince, here is the power prices:

 << File: Power prices.xls >>
Jason


Brent and Mark;

Remi Collonges has asked me to set up branches of ECE (Enron's marketing
entity) in different submarkets of Brazil (States of Bahia and Santa
Catarina).  I've been told by Randy Young that, prior to opening a "trading
office", we may need Board approval.  I'd appreciate it if you could provide
me with more information on the matter.

Rgds,

Sami


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

Thank you for your order.

You bought 260 shares of AMCC (Applied Micro Circuits Corp Com) at 65 11/16.

ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: B-500-AASN-4143
Order entered at:                      08:05:59 on 11/14/00
Order processing began at:             08:05:59
Order executed at:                     08:06:00 on 11/14/00

ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 08:06:00 on 11/14/00
Your position in AMCC is 260 shares
Your real cash total is $-7,197.30

You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.

Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number.


Now here is fine one!
-----Original Message-----
From: amm303@talkmatch.com [mailto:amm303@talkmatch.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:48 PM
To: plucci@enron.com
Subject: Hi

Paul,
Thanks for writing, This is definitely a source for amusement. I too have been playing with this for a short time (about a week). I don't use my computer that often in my work, so I'm kind of new at this stuff. I don't even know how to put my picture in my profile.
      Sometimes I think I moved to the sleepiest town in Colorado. Everytime I tell someone where I live they say "Superior? Where's That?"
My favorite Italian Restaurant is in Broomfield, Original Pizza on Midway. Have you been there?
Yeah lets meet. A drive around the city sounds great and a drink always  helps.
Wait, How do I know your not the freakish type that might try and take advantage of me. After all, you know this city better than I do. Humm, This Could be Trouble.
Why don't you give me a call and I can try to size you up on the phone.
Home # 303-543-1108   Cell# 720-313-4857
                                                Talk to ya soon
                                                      Anne.

*********************************************************

IMPORTANT TIPS TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS AT Love@AOL by Match.com:

If you use the "reply" button to respond to this message, please take the following steps:

1.  DELETE ALL TEXT from the body of your message, including header information which may include your actual email address.

2.  REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURES which may include your personal contact information.

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address (in the From: field), so that it will NOT appear in the "From:" line. However, DO NOT use the "Cc:" or "Bcc:" fields as these addresses CANNOT be stripped away.

You may also contact this person from their Love@AOL by Match.com profile by clicking "Contact this person" and composing your message directly from the site.

Love@AOL by Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our Love@AOL by Match.com Service Agreement.


Just following up on the Monday conference call discussion yesterday with
Rick and others about nailing down the numbers and documentation so we can
feed the Hill information on the mistakes Governor Davis made last year and
this year on power supply contracts.

As I understand it, there are two aspects of this:

 1. The offer of Enron and others last year to sell power to California
utilities for 5 cents per kw.  Failure to accept these offers resulted in
higher power costs in the range of $15 billion, as I recall from yesterday's
call.

 2. The long term contracts that California signed this year after taking
actions and making statements that drove up the forward price curves are now
under water to the tune of $20 billion.

On both counts we will be pressed for assumptions and documentation to pursue
these arguments, which parallel the comments made by senior management in
Capitol Hill meeting last week.  We will work on back up on this end, but we
would greatly appreciate your assistance in this regard as well.

With Congress out of session starting COB on Thursday, we will need
information pulled together by tomorrow COB to get the final product in the
hands of congressional types and others who can use it on a timely basis.
Thanks.


Jeff:

Here are two of the documents that you need for the California filing.  I am
also sending these documents via UPS to you tonight for Monday a.m. delivery
along with a few other items.

Have a great weekend!

Tracy

(See attached file: bio.doc)(See attached file: aftstariff.doc)

 - bio.doc
 - aftstariff.doc


Tom,

We are currently space constrained but we shall always take a qualified
candidate. Please, ask George to send me a resume and we shall get in touch
with him
to arrange a phone/on-location interview.

Vince

Tom Arnold <tmarnol@lsu.edu> on 04/25/2001 09:15:09 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Potential Prospect

Hey Vince,

Given that the Eastern Finance Conference is already taking place, I think
it is safe to assume that they did not desire an energy derivative round
table discussion.  However, I appreciate you volunteering to potentially
having been on such a round table discussion.

I've been teaching a "real options" course that has the students performing
monte carlo analysis, Black-Scholes pricing, and binomial pricing along
with a heavy dosage of understanding risk neutral pricing.  A few of your
new hires from the undergraduate program will be coming from this course.
However, I have a student who will be finishing his MBA next spring that is
particularly good.  He is genuinely interested and curious about option
pricing, trading, and hedging with Excel/VBA skills.  In fact, he usually
figures out when I make even very small mistakes in my calculations.

This is not to say that some of my other students aren't very talented
themselves, but that this person really stands out.  Do you think you
and/or Enron would be interested in such a person?  If so, what do you
recommend that he do to get his foot in the door?

His intention is to finish the MBA, but I do not know if this would
preclude you from hiring or at least taking a look at him now.  His name is
George Moss and I ordinarily would not bother you directly about a
potential employee.  I am making an exception in this case because he is a
particularly good talent without being the slightest bit arrogant.

Otherwise, I hope this e-mail finds you doing well and not travelling too
much.

Tom
Professor Tom Arnold
E.J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Department of Finance
2155 CEBA
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
O: 225-388-6369
F: 225-388-6366


Call id you have any discrepancies.  Thanks


please print out incl text
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 12:45 PM -----

	Mike McConnell
	02/06/2001 12:04 PM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: resume of former Duke collegue

Jeff,
My brother had this guy call him and he forwarded his resume.  Do you know
him?  Any interest?
If you do, please forward on.
Thanks,
mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
12:03 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark McConnell@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 01/31/2001 05:08 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: resume of former Duke collegue

Mike attached is Mark Evans' resume.  He worked at Duke and I believe he
managed their NE gas book.

No special consideration needed.  I just promised him that I would get it to
someone in your group.

Thanks,

Mark

_______________________
Mark McConnell
Enron Broadband Services
713-345-7896  office
713-822-4862  cell
713-646-5745  fax
mark_mcconnell@enron.net


Richard -

Attached is an outline of the involvement we've engaged AA to perform for
each business unit as they go-live onto SAP.  Please remember that ENA is
going live onto SAP's "common design" that has already been reviewed by AA
from a internal controls perspective.  So this attachment outlines those
items outside of "common design" that Wanda and Sally  probably want covered
from an ENA perspective.  As a rule of thumb, this proposed scope equates to
$100k - $150k in fees to AA that is over & above the audit budget.

One word of advice:  Designate a lead within ENA that has the time to stay on
top of the project, schedule meetings with AA, and coordinate their
involvement with the SAP team members, e.g. not Wanda or Sally, but at a
director/manager level at least.  I was the designee for Corp and ensured
that AA kept the project going.  Also, I worked extensively with the Janet
Tran, SAP lead director responsible for bringing Corp up.  Some big benefits:
Kept AA out of SAP's hair when things got rough.
Made sure that the SAP team knew what our goals & objectives were, especially
when we found something that needed fixed before go-live.
Managed that in fact AA provided us a deliverable at the end of the project.

Please review and call if you need other info.  I'd be glad to assist ENA
too.  I assisted Europe (Naomi Connell) and Int'l cos (John Berggren).  They
appreciated having a "co-pilot" and we avoided duplication of effort with
what had already been done for the prior go-lives.  Also, they felt that
value was rec'd for dollars paid to AA for this work.

Terrie


Thanks for the report.  Just what I needed.

From:	PEGGY FOWLER/ENRON@enronxgate on 04/27/2001 05:16 PM
To:	Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:	Mary Trosper/ENRON@enronxgate

Subject:	Re: WEEKLY BUSINESS ACTIVITY UPDATES

For Portland General Electric, week of April 23, 2001
1)Announcement of termination of Enron and Sierra Pacific deal was uneventful,
and not surprising to employees and Portland Community.
2)Time was spent in addressing questions from data room in San Francisco.
3)FERC ordered the Cal ISO to file by 6/1/01, a RTO proposal with FERC. At the
same time FERC's approval of the effort by the 9 NW utilities (IOUs plus BPA)
to form RTO West was conditioned on making a 12/1/01 compliance filing that
addresses seams issues with California and Canada, and a timetable for
creating a West-wide RTO. Together, these orders should help prevent
California's efforts to balkanize their power system.
4)FERC's order on RTO West gave a boost to the inclusion within the RTO of the
independent-for-profit transmission company (TransConnect) proposed by 6 of
the 9 RTO utilities including PGE. Relying heavily on TransConnect's
independence, the Commission approved TransConnect's proposal to file for
innovative and incentive rates.
5)Wholesale sales continue strong in a robust market.
6)Thermal plants are in sequential annual  maintenance outages.
7)Hydro plants operations are reduced due to poor water condition in NW.
8)Contract negotiations continue with IBEW Local 125. Next meeting is
scheduled for May 7.
9)Customer Information System installation is approaching 75% completion,
being on schedule, and under budget.
10)Joint Meter Reading project is on target with 850,000 routes now merged
with NW Natural Gas.
11)SB 1149, Oregon's version of deregulation, is still uncertain in the
legislature. We are ready to implement on whatever timeframe is decided.
12)We plan to submit another fast track small microturbine generating plant
for RAROC next week.
13)Senator Gordon Smith reception held to keep contact on issues around price
caps, and there determental effect on energy markets and new generation.

>>> Horton, Stanley 04/23/01 02:57PM >>>
I would appreciate if each of you could provide a brief (one-page or less)
bullet point summary of the week's activity by close of business each Friday.
You can send either via e-mail or fax.

Jeff has his staff meetings on Monday mornings and it would help me keep him
abreast of key activities in your respective areas.

I don't need anything elaborate.

Thanks,
Stan


Please print and fax to me at 713 973 0287.  I'll forward a couple more I
need faxed.  Thanks  Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/25/2000 08:38
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           10/25/2000 08:14 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: FuelCell contract questions

1.  6 months is fine.  I think the standard should be higher on the 2.0 MW
units.

2.  I would say that there should be a drawing for the foundation.  We should
make the standard relative to the drawings either "substantially in
accordance" or "not materially different."

3.  If termination is for a cause created by FuelCells.

4.  We should have a storage option if FuelCells is ahead of schedule on
their deliveries.

5.  We should be able to assign to CRRA in all cases.  A financial standard
for everyone else is fine.


I spoke with Steve Kessler this morning.  He told me that he agreed with
Carol to net commodity transactions (which was actually more than he wanted
to agree to!).  However, DB does not have the systems to net within other
product groups.  Sara


Frank and Randy,

Attached are clean and marked versions of the CEG/CEG-Rio DASH for your
review.  Any comments you make with respect to tightening up and shortening
the "Risk Matrix" would be appreciated.  I would also like to receive a copy
of the Legal Risk Memo before we finalize this.  We have classsified this
transaction as "Merchant" which obviated the requirement for Board of
Directors approval.

Your assistance in finalizing this DASH and hopefully have it circulated and
fully executed by week's end is appreciated.

Regards,

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Young, Randy
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:56 AM
To: Gorte, David; Cangucu, Andre
Cc: Stabler, Frank; Haedicke, Mark
Subject: RE: FW: CEG/CEG-Rio Dash (Final Version)

Attached is the DASH.  Sorry for the omission.

Randy

 << File: CEGDASH, Final Version 042701.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Young, Randy
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Gorte, David; Cangucu, Andre
Cc: Stabler, Frank; Haedicke, Mark
Subject: Re: FW: CEG/CEG-Rio Dash (Final Version)

Dave and Andre: Attached is a final version of the CEG/CEG-Rio DASH for
circulation and approval.  The Purchase and Sale Agreement is anticipated to
be signed on Sunday morning, April 29th.  Given the short time period and in
order to expedite, please circulate a separate copy to each approving party.

Mark:  Since you have asked me to sign the DASH, I wanted to make sure you
had a copy for review in connection with your legal risk memo.  As you will
see, the DASH goes into a little more detail than the bullet-point format of
the legal risk memo would allow.

Thank you,
Randy

Randel R Young
Vice President & Assistant General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, #3870A
Houston, TX 77002
-OR-
PO Box 1198
Houston, TX 77251-1188

Phone:  713-345-2460
Assistant: 713-345-2459
Fax: 713-646-6058
Cell: 281-541-3885
E-mail:  randy.young@enron.com

******************************************************************************
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information and is
only intended for the persons and entities to which it is addressed.  If any
party receiving this message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative thereof, the receiving party is hereby notified that the
review, dissemination or copying of this message, any attachment thereto, or
information contained therein, is prohibited.  If this message is received in
error, please notify the sender immediately by return email and delete this
email and all attachments from your system.
******************************************************************************


Too late with your spreadsheet.  The instructions that we got from Donna were
that I should review the resumes, pass them to Brent for his review, and then
on to Causey for his review.  Considering our schedules and the large number
of resumes to review, that would have been an impossible task to complete by
Thursday at noon.  I received the resumes after lunch on Tuesday, just before
leaving for the airport to catch the plane for Oklahoma.  I asked Patti to
make a copy of the packet for Brent, and I knew that Rick would not want to
take the time to review the resumes without some organization and screening
first.  I reviewed as many of the resumes as I could on the plane on the way
back to Houston today (all of the liberal arts resumes and about one third of
the business resumes) and Brent reviewed them last night after his training
class.  We got those to Rick today by noon, as he was leaving the office.  I
believe that Rick will review what Brent and I put together and then will
pass the resumes along to you.  Since you only e:mailed your spreadsheet this
morning after Brent and I had done our reviews, you will have to
cross-reference the info on the spreadsheet with the selected resumes.

Brent and I would have appreciated some organization and screening of the
resumes as well.  I would suggest that in the future that your team should
make copies of the resumes for everyone that you would like to have doing the
review.  The plan of passing them from one person to another is not
practical,  and I should not have had to make the copies for Brent.  If you
are going to ask VP's and MD's to help in this process in a very short time
frame, then I would suggest that you use their time wisely.  If someone from
you team had organized the resumes into three groups by GPA's or majors, that
would have given us a good starting point, instead of a jumble of resumes.
Two page resumes were not stapled together and there were a number of resumes
of MBA's included, which should be considered for Associates interviews, not
Analysts interviews.  Please give us organized information to react to, not
simply a jumble of data that we have to weed through.  All of us want to
participate and to be as involved as possible in the recruiting process, but
we need to be able to rely on the Program for some basic administrative and
organizational work.

I send these suggestions with the intent of constantly bettering the program
and with the intent of helping you to succeed in your role, not being
critical.  I hope that you will take these suggestions in that light.

Brent and I (and I am sure Hunter, too) would have appreciated


---------------------- Forwarded by Donald M- ECT Origination Black/HOU/ECT
on 04/04/2000 05:41 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Lou Stoler                           04/03/2000 12:01 PM

To: jbrow23@entergy.com
cc: Donald M- ECT Origination Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement-Entergy/EPMI

Mr. Brown:

At Don Black's request, I attache our draft of the Confidentiality Agreement
for your review.

Lou Stoler


I need to do a draft for a paper confirmation that is an Omnibus Swaption.
The only template that I have is the one I attached. Is it O.K. to use? Can I
use the current ISDA one and tweek it to be an Omnibus (ie: Determination
Periods, no reference to ISDA)?

Thanks,

Jarrod


Sorry for the delay in getting back to you about my friend saar at goldman
sachs.  he recently moved departments, and I will get you relevant data
shortly.

regards.
 Jeff


STILL the best way to handle those wacky Colstrip cuts.  Please familiarize
yourself with the procedure then check with me if you have questions.

Thanks,
Bill

---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 03/05/2001
06:43 AM ---------------------------

Jeremy Morris
06/27/2000 11:59 PM
To: Portland Shift
cc:

Subject: FASTEST, EASIEST, AND CORRECT WAY TO HANDLE COLSTRIP CUTS IN ENPOWER

1.)In enpower, build an index forward buy from PGE under LTNW book for the
total amount of mws cut due to colstrip going down.  Use the DOW JONES MIDC
index (remember to specify in the index if it is on or off-peak).  Enter an
offset of .10  .

2.) Enter a transmission deal from BPA.   (MIDC to MPC SYS)  The transmission
fee is $2.52

3.) Go into deal scheduling and query  under the counterparty PGE.  Select all

4.) bring up all deals of the counterparties involved at Colstrip----
specifically, Ashgrove,Conocpil, Energywesr, Louisiana Pacific, and Smurfit
Stone.
 (these enpower deal numbers can be located under the counterparties name in
lotus notes.)

5.)Zero out the buy from PGE @MPC SYS

6.) Finally link the deals.

7.) check real time postion manager, you should be flat after this.

This is basically how Diana Scholtes explained it to me.  It worked and
hopefully it will work for all


No rest for the wicked, huh?

I'd offer to take you out for that drink tonight, but I need to pick up Avril
from the airport in an hour.

Hope you got to enjoy at least some of your weekend. . .

Dave

To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Draft EOL Termination Letter

I have not received any comments.  I consider it final.  Let me know if you
need to have it customized for any particular circumstance.  Since I don't
know who (or for that matter what) the PCG heads are, I sugggest that if they
need it you send them copies.

David Forster
02/13/2000 04:23 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Draft EOL Termination Letter

Mark,

Please let me know when you consider this letter finalised - one of us should
send copies to the PCG heads.

Dave

	From:  Mark Taylor                           01/26/2000 12:39 AM

To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Draft EOL Termination Letter

Here's a draft of a termination letter.  I'd be happy to see what everyone
thinks before we use it.  For instance, what tone are we aiming for?  If we
want to be all legal and hard-nosed, I can throw in ETA section references,
etc. or if we want to be softer we can emphasize other trading opportunities
within Enron and possibly explain our reasons for the termination.

Let me know what you think.


Sticking to Motocross eh.


<OMNI>
<OMNINotes></OMNINotes>

<OMNIPAB></OMNIPAB>

<OMNIToDos></OMNIToDos>

<OMNICalendarEntries>
</OMNICalendarEntries>

</OMNI>


We have reached resolution regarding the parking and mass transit issue.  Until notified otherwise, the parking and mass transit subsidy will continue as an employee benefit.

For those who have a payroll parking deduction, your deduction has been stopped.  No deduction should occur on 12/31/01 payroll.  In addition, you should receive a credit for the deduction taken for the 12/15 payroll.

For those who incurred any out-of-pocket parking costs during the month of December, you may expense up to $89 for reimbursement.

Beginning 1/1/02, parking and mass transit will continue as follows:

WTC Parking:  You should receive your parking pass in the mail. Payroll deductions will begin on the 1/15/02 paycheck. (No Action Req'd)

Outside Parking Lots:  Park at lot of your choice and pay out of pocket.  Request reimbursement of up to $89 per month. (No payroll parking deduction will occur)

Tri-Met and MAX employees:  Passes are available for January.  If you would like to pick up your pass, please see Debra Davidson.

NOTE:  Extra Tri-Met passes are available.  If you would like to select mass transit as your parking option, please notify either Grace or myself before Friday, 12/21/01 EOB and we will insure a monthly pass is available.

Validations:  We will no longer validate parking passes, however, you are able to reimburse up to $89 per month for daily parking.

If you have any questions, please let us know!

ENA Human Resources
Julie Kearney
503) 464-7404

Grace Rodriguez
503) 464-8321


Conference # 1-800-711-8000       Access Code 8536845


I am trying to pull together a report on the future of the gas market in
Texas.  I was wondering if you have a report that shows new generation coming
on in the next 3-4 years as well as a report that shows current generation.
The names of the companies building/owning the facilities is not important.
The most important data is MW capacity as well as type of generation (i.e.,
natural gas, coal, etc.)

Do you have this information?

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


Joe:
You mentioned last night that you had had no luck on getting curves for Feb 20th.
If you don't think that anything is going to change in that respect, could you give me what you have.
I can then go talk to PWC and let them know that we have done all that we feasibly can.

Thanks,
Paul


kentucky is #2

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Timothy Blanchard @ EES                           03/10/2000 10:58 AM

To: ebass@ect.enron.com @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: ESPN.com - NCB - Ratings Percentage Index

and you sent this because....


Answers below-you two would have had my responses w/o
any carrot of wine!
Courtney
--- Kelly Davis <kelly_p_davis@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are doing an analysis of training in various size
> companies, and would appreciate
> your responses to the following questions (there's
> only 10).
>
> Names of all respondents who reply by Friday will be
> ENTERED INTO A DRAWING for a BOTTLE OF WINE!
>
> Answer as many of them as you want.  Thank you VERY
> MUCH for your time with this!!
> With your answers Jim & I will be one step closer to
> graduation :)
>
> - Kelly & Jim
> ------------
>
>  1)     How many employees are in your company?
> What industry is the company in?  Approx
40,000/Technology
>
>  2) Do you have a training program for your job
> function - mandatory, voluntary, or none?
Mandatory-specific to my role and responsibilities.
>
>  3) Do you do your job better as a result of the
> training you received?  Absolutley
>         If you haven't received training, would you
> do your job better had you receive some? yes
>
>  4) If yes, how long is the training conducted?  Is
> it conducted on a regular basis? Initial 3 weeks,
Ad-Hoc training sessions available approx 2 weeks/year
>
>  5) Is your training conducted by professional
> trainers or through a
>         mentor-type system or some other way?  Which
> one would you prefer? professional trainers,
(consultants)
>
>  6)     What kind of training, if any, would you
> like to have right now?  Why? none
>
>  7) Do you think training should be conducted at all
> levels of the organization? Why? YES!  Everyone
needs to dedicate time to learning & developing skills
in an organization.  The trick is that the training
must have be relevant, applicable, & targeted
(appropriate for level), and have a very clear
objective.
>
>  8) What type of training do you think is
> unnecessary at your company?  Hard for me to
determine-lots not applicable to me, but useful to
others, (i.e. Java)
>         What kind of training should be mandatory?
> Why?  Basic org stuff, basic company
product/industry stuff.
>
>  9) Would you feel better about the company or the
> team knowing that everyone went
>         through a structured training program? I'd
feel better if it were the type of training mentioned
above...it's important for all employees to know what
their company does.  Probably not as important for
small companies, because this learning happens
effectively through informal channels.

>
>  10) Rank the statements below regarding your
> perceptions about training (1 is most mportant):
>
5)I do it because it is mandatory;
2) I do it because it will help me learn my job
quicker;
3)I do it because it will give me skills I can
use in my next job;
4)I do it because it will help the company be
more profitable;
1) I do it because it allows me to refresh my
skills;
6)I do it because it is a way to get away from
my job

>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great
> prices
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000
08:40 AM ---------------------------

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
02/22/2000 01:10 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: News article on Enron

  India: Enron aftermath

   Business Line - 02/21/2000

   Abhay Mehta

   Copyright (C) 2000 Kasturi & Sons Ltd (KSL); Source: World Reporter (TM) -
Asia Intelligence Wire

   Power Play

   A Study of the Enron Project

   * Publishers: Orient Longman, New Delhi * Price: Rs. 195

   THE Enron power project at Dabhol in Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra has
been mired in nationwide controversy ever since the
   inception of the project proposal in 1992; and the sordid tale ends only
in 1997, with the Supreme Court of India refusing to even
   admit an appeal against the Bombay High Court decision, of December 1996,
which while commenting that "This case has
   highlighted to the people as to how even after 50 years of Independence,
political considerations outweigh the public interest and
   the interest of the State and to what extent the Government can go to
justify its actions not only before the public but even before
   the courts of law" - yet dismissed a public interest petition against the
project on the (purely technical) ground of res judicata, even
   though new facts, new arguments, new evidence of the violation of the laws
of the land had been advanced by the petitioners.

   The fact that the fresh violations of the law were not even considered and
recorded, despite the petitioners adducing the required
   evidence, can only be termed as strange, perhaps bizarre.

   Abhay Mehta's simple, factual documentation - in fact a chronological
narration - of all events, including the process of bending all
   rules, of subverting the law for promoting a project involving
unparalleled future liabilities for Maharashtra, indeed for the whole of
   India - is not only masterly, it is devastating.

   It is a short, pithy book which deserves to be read from cover to cover by
all thinking citizens of this country. Barring the
   concluding chapter, the epilogue, there are no personal comments, only
facts, disseminated from the original papers, mostly 'secret'
   documents.

   All documentation has been carefully, faithfully recorded, including
extracts from supposedly 'top secret' minutes of cabinet
   committee meetings; and the specific violations of the law (which were
opposed by a few public spirited civil servants, much to
   their disadvantage) have been pointed up. Apart from an introductory
'Primer on Electricity' - introduced for the benefit of the
   layman, explaining some technical issues relating to electricity
generation, transmission and distribution - and the background of the
   events of 1991, the foreign exchange crisis, and the aftermath of the
crisis, the other fifteen chapters, three appendices and fourteen
   annexes of the small book (of 226 pages) packs in an enormous volume of
factual information. The strange saga of the Enron
   project, and the sheer magnitude of the future problems this one single
project poses for the country, need to be briefly recounted
   here, for essentially, it is the coming generation which would have to
face the problem.

   The MSEB has contracted to buy - and if not used, to pay for - 2000 MW of
electricity (for a period of 20 years) from the
   Dabhol Power Company (the legal entity set up by Enron, as an unlimited
liability company registered in India, through a maze of
   intricate crossholdings of equity by half a dozen or more 'front'
companies registered in various tax-free havens.

   Abhay Mehta has indicated the total payments to Enron over 20 years amount
to $ 35 billion (at 1998 exchange rates, around Rs.
   1,25,000 crores) over the life of the project. One must record that: (a)
crude oil/oil product prices have as of writing, more than
   doubled since the above calculations were made. A per the 'doctored'
figures presented by the company (and its advocate), the
   charge per unit of electricity supplied, at the 1998 level of prices, was
to 4.39 cent (per unit) as 'capacity charge' and 3.43 cents
   (per unit) for 'energy costs'.

   The former is indexed to the US inflation rate, and the latter to
international fuel prices. The former may be assumed to have gone
   up only marginally (rounded to 4.4 cents per unit); we know that fuel
prices have more than doubled internationally over 1999.
   Assuming the 'fuel costs' to have increased less than 100 per cent - even
though international prices have more than doubled - we
   may assume (for 1999) energy costs of 6.85 cents per units, making for a
total payment of 11.25 US cents per unit of electricity
   supplied by the Dabhol Power Company (DPC) to MSEB in late 1999, in Phase
I of the project.

   Within another two years, at 2000 MW, the annual offtake (for 365 days X
24 hours/day) would be 17.52 billion KWH; and at
   11.25 cents per unit, the total payment amounts to $1.97 billion annually;
for 20 years, this workout to $ 39.4 billion.

   This is not counting any further inflation in either energy costs or
capacity charge. At today's exchange rate - about Rs.43.5 per US
   dollar - in rupee terms this works out to wore than Rs. 175,000 crores (as
compared to Rs. 125,000 crores indicated by Abhay
   Mehta). This is the cost to MSEB in rupee; and to the country in foreign
exchange as payment to just one project authority, for
   supply of part of the power required in Maharashtra.

   The really significant point to note in this connection is that this
payment - and considerably more, depending on (a) future increase
   in'capacity charges' depending on US inflation rate, and international
prices of LNGaphtha (for 'fuel costs'), and (b) depreciation of
   the exchange rate of the rupee vis-a-vis the US dollar - is obligatory;
the assets of the MSEB, the Maharashtra government
   indeed, all assets of the Government of India (present and future) are
mortgaged to Enron, by way of sovereign guarantees
   extended by both governments.

   The other significant point in this connection is that - as predicted by
all independent Indian experts as well as the World Bank -the
   Enron project he forced the MSEB to cut its offtake of Tata Electric
Company's and its own much cheaper thermal power
   already; in a postscript dated August 1999, Abhay Mehta has indicated that
already, the MSEB had stopped buying between 200
   and 250 MW of power from Tata Electric (available at Rs. 1.80 per unit)
and has had to backdown its own Chandrapur thermal
   power station (cost of this power being Rs. 1.20 per unit), while forced
to buy more expensive Enron power at Rs. 5 per unit.

   The loss to MSEB on this count alone comes to Rs. 460 crore per year.

   This had in fact, been predicted earlier even by the World Bank.

   It is pointless here to go into the details of how precisely all this was
contrived, by a deliberate campaign of 'disinformation', of
   blatant lies, of sidelining of expert opinion, not only of independent
experts but also the GOI's own official advisers in this matter,
   namely, the Central Electricity Authority as well as that of the World
Bank, which was resolutely opposed to this project. The
   detailed facts, the letters exchanged in the above context, the pressure
tactics adopted, the flouting of all procedures norms, even
   statutory provisions of the Electricity (Supply) Act, are all carefully
documented by Abhay Mehta.

   Mehta correctly concludes: "We frequently blame external agencies - like
the World Bank - for all our problems, when, as a
   matter of fact, we ourselves are our own worst enemies. In the instant
case, the World Bank not only advised the Government of
   India against the project, it stood resolutely firm in its assessment of
the total inadvisability of this project. In fact, one must note
   here that in 1996, neighbouring Pakistan, which had entered into a
somewhat similar MoU with Enron, cancelled the project (and
   the Power Purchase Agreement with Enron), for a $ 670 million, 782 MW
residual oil-fuelled power plant, even though that
   Agreement had stipulated Enron power supply at a fixed rate of 6.4 US
cents per KWH over a 30 year period. (Note the
   estimated rate of 11.25 cents per KWH for Dabhol power for the MSEB in
December 1999, which works out to around Rs. 5
   per unit).

   One could go on; but one must leave the reader to go through Abhay Mehta's
crisp, factual, matter of fact narration of the Enron
   saga, and switch over to the point made by him in the epilogue to the
story, about 'The Next Round of Scams'.

   For quite some time, the ruling elite in India has been intent on
'privatising' all public enterprises; and even 'utilities' are no
   exception. The 'unbundling' of infrastructure with a view to privatisation
of all the 'profitable' segments. All this - as per the current
   'disinformation campaign' - is supposedly in the interest of
rationalisation and greater efficiency of poorer supply.

   The author has referred in this context to the acquisition from the
Government - by the Torrent Group - of the Ahmedabad and
   Surat Electricity companies at less than one-tenth of the market value of
the assets of thee facilities. Again, much like the Enron
   saga, all objections by the Finance Department of the Gujarat government
were overruled.

   And, Abhay Mehta has predicated that this onslaught - the break-up of
power utilities into three segments, generation, transmission
   and distribution, - with a view to their privatisation is likely to be the
new thrust by the ruling elite, for reasons that do not require to
   be spelt out.

   Though Mehta had the examples of the Torrent Group takeover of Ahmedabad
and Surat Electricity companies, and of the break
   up of the Orissa State Electricity Board before him, yet his statement can
be stated today to be prophetic; the UPSEB is now on
   the firing line. The recent strike by the workers and engineers of the
UPSEB in protest of the announced UP government decision
   to trifurcate the UPSEB; and the Union Minister of Power, Mr. Rangarajan
Kumaramangalam's statement that the UPSEB is a
   loss making, inefficient unit and that privatisation of the facilities
after the trifurcation - need to be noted.

   That 40 per cent of the dues of the UPSEB are from the UP Government; that
tariffs for UP electricity supply are fixed by the UP
   government and not by the UPSEB; that the UPSEB does not have the cash
even for routine maintenance as a result of the above
   - these are facts that nobody is prepared even to consider. That the
remedy for UPSEB lies in a different kind of reform and
   restructuring, is not even to be debated. The whole idea is to privatise
the profitable segments, and to leave the public sector entity
   with all the problem areas, including rural energy supply. It is against
this background that Abhay Mehta's book needs to be widely
   disseminated, read, and its implications understood.

   What is at stake is not a 'utility' here or a PSU there. What is at stake
is the future of some 80 per cent of the have-nots in this
   country.

   What is at stake is the 'pillory' of the assets of the nation for private
aggrandisement.

   Arun Ghosh


FYI:  Per Brent Hendry, I am forwarding to you'all the following
comparisons.-Becky

	Becky Spencer@ECT
	03/05/2001 10:10 AM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: comparison

See attached comparisons:

=======================================================

	Brent Hendry@ENRON
	03/05/2001 09:45 AM

		 To: Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: comparison

I need a comparison of these two sets of documents.  I need to know how the
more recent documents changed from the last drafts.  Thanks.


Please find attached the captioned report for the week ending May 25.  A
topic / key word index follows below, in order to facilitate coming up to
date on topics of interest to you.  If you wish to add or delete names from
the distribution, please advise.   Should you have any question on any of the
items, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Thanks.  Ray

Agreement termination: B
Ancillary sales: 15
CA infrastructure FERC tech. conference: A
CAISO ancillary services & supplemental energy complaint: 37
Interconnect Agreement: 1, 2, 3, 5, 28, 34, 36
Market monitoring and mitigation: 29
Meter service agreement: 8,10
NOx in proxy market clearing price for power: 27
Operating Agreement: 1,2,3,4
PGE: 26
Participating generator agreement: 7,9,11,12
Power Sale Agreement: 4,21,22
Power Sale Tariff: 16,30,31,32,33
Radial lines: 35
RTO: 39
Transmission Service Agreement: 14, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 36, 38
Transmission Tariff: 6,13,17,25