---------------------- Forwarded by John D. Williamson on 10/11/2001 10:33
AM ---------------------------

To:   sakom@attglobal.net, larrye1@earthlink.net
cc:   rwbrown@sidrichgas.com, mathewmg@bp.com,
      therbert99@mail.earthlink.net, therbert99@earthlink.net,
      sjett@summitenergy.com, beeson@iglou.com, am.borbely@pnl.gov,
      brad.king@usa.conoco.com, brennan_s_higgins@hotmail.com,
      bnfox@swbell.net, dffpburg@access.mountain.net, derive@sound.net,
      detlef@capstoneenergy.com, emartell@pngts.com, John D.
      Williamson@ANDERSEN WO, leslie.vandagriff@highlandenergy.com,
      mark.anderson@swgas.com, rsasaki@socalgas.com,
      robert@pelicangasmgt.com, rbellows@telusplanet.net,
      tad@goldstonoil.com, tstatts@summitenergy.com,
      tomjsaal@winstarmail.com
Date: 10/11/2001 10:21 AM
From: rwbrown@sidrichgas.com
Subject:  Possible Natural Gas Hoax

     With all the fear going around, I feel I should warn you of a
possible "scare-tactic" I have heard of that might occur on April 1 of next
year.....

     I have a friend who has a friend who dates his cousin who has a
contact at a company where a guy has a friend who knows someone who trades
natural gas basis.

     Apparently, this person went to Sullivan's in Houston the other
night and overheard a story that shivered my timbers.   He said that he
heard some well dressed guys talking in hushed tones about natural gas
prices.  He overheard that there was a rumor going around at one of the
guy's offices that a gas trader there has a friend who heard this story
from
a scheduler who knows a power trader who dates a lease crude buyer who has
a
cousin who works in accounting at a publicly traded company that does
business with a pinto bean grower in South Texas.

     Apparently, on April 1st, some strangers will be going around with
their index finger pointed out of a closed fist.  They may look like they
are pointing the finger.  They may approach you for assistance with their
finger.

     DO NOT PULL THEIR FINGER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     This may or may not be real but I am sending it out to those I care
about.

     "The only thing we have to fear......is fear itself!"    said
Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


You can call Sherrif. If you need my help let me know.


Thanks, Don, I know you are having a rough morning. I know TVA and Ercot
have been gathered over the phone.

We have not gotten EES yet. IF you can send it that would be great,
otherwise I will call in for it a little later.

Ellen Clardy, Ph.D.
Power Markets Analyst
TradersNews
713/647-6603
ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tradersnewsindexes@littleblue.ipgdirect.com
[mailto:owner-tradersnewsindexes@littleblue.ipgdirect.com]On Behalf Of
Don.Baughman@enron.com
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 10:03 AM
To: Tradersnewsindexes@ipgdirect.com
Subject: EPMI traders news index

Attached is the CE & CIN index data.  EES, TVA and ERCOT were relayed
verbally.

Tnanks,
Don

(See attached file: 03_16_01 IPG INDEX REPORT.xls)


Any word on an executed CA??
Regards,
Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 7:22 PM
To: pgroetzinger@brentbroker.com
Subject: RE: BrentBroker Full Style

Thanks!.  I'll fax it back to you after it's signed.

                    "Pete Groetzinger"
                    <pgroetzinger@brentb        To:
<Tana.Jones@enron.com>
                    roker.com>                  cc:     "David Salomon"
<dsalomon@lab9.com>, <John.Pavetto@enron.com>,
                                                <Louise.Kitchen@enron.com>
                    07/13/2000 07:08 PM         Subject:     RE: BrentBroker
Full Style

Tana - I just sent the executed CA to your fax machine.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 6:00 PM
To: pgroetzinger@brentbroker.com
Cc: Louise.Kitchen@enron.com; John.Pavetto@enron.com
Subject: Re: BrentBroker Full Style

Please find attached a copy of our proposed form of Confidentiality
Agreement.  Please call me if you have any comments or questions.  If the
agreement meets with your approval, please have an authorizied officer of
the company execute it and return the signed document to me at the fax
number below.  Thanks for your attention herewith.

I passed on your "regards" to Robbi Rossi.

(See attached file: brentbroker.doc)

Tana Jones
Paralegal
Ph:  (713) 853-3399
Fax:  (713) 646-3490

                    "Pete Groetzinger"
                    <pgroetzinger@brentb        To:
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    roker.com>                  cc:
                                                Subject:     BrentBroker
Full Style
                    07/12/2000 05:01 PM

Tana -

The legal name is: Brent Broker.com LLC

I look forward to receiving your Confidentiality Agreement.

Regards,

Peter V. Groetzinger, COO
BrentBroker.com
One Riverway, Suite 2500
Houston, Texas 77056
USA
713.888.0500
www.brentbroker.com


A similar article appeared in today's Sacramento Bee.  It's in the clips
Miyung circulated.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Karen.Denne@enron.com>
To: <Kenneth.Lay@enron.com>; <Jeff.Skilling@enron.com>;
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>; <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>;
<Alan.Comnes@enron.com>; <Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>;
<James.D.Steffes@enron.com>; <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>;
<ken@kdscommunications.com>; <Elizabeth.Tilney@enron.com>;
<Paula.Rieker@enron.com>; <Mark.Koenig@enron.com>; <David.Leboe@enron.com>;
<Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>; <Paul.Kaufman@enron.com>; <bhansen@enron.com>;
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>; <hgovenar@govadv.com>; <sgovenar@govadv.com>;
<Robert.Frank@enron.com>; <jdietri@enron.com>; <John.J.Lavorato@enron.com>;
<Greg.Whalley@enron.com>; <ddelain2@enron.com>; <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
Cc: <Mark.Palmer@enron.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 6:52 AM
Subject: LA Times Article

This is the Los Angeles Times article Mark has been working on...

California; Metro Desk
Electricity Cost Data Spread the Blame Power: Many suppliers charged more
than the firms that Davis has pilloried, records show.
RICH CONNELL; ROBERT J. LOPEZ; DOUG SMITH
TIMES STAFF WRITERS

07/10/2001
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
B-1
Copyright 2001 / The Times Mirror Company

SACRAMENTO -- California's energy meltdown involves a far more diverse
group of wholesale electricity merchants than suggested by Gov. Gray Davis,
who has aggressively blamed a handful of Texas companies, state records
show.

During the first three months of this year--one of the worst stretches of
power shortages during the crisis--an assortment of public and private
entities charged the state prices averaging well above some of those paid
to Texas firms, according to documents released to The Times on Monday by
the Department of Water Resources, which now buys power for California.

Among those setting and collecting some of the highest average prices per
megawatt-hour were a Canadian public utility, a subsidiary of San Diego Gas
& Electric's parent company, and the Los Angeles Department of Water and
Power, the report shows. Their average prices ranged from $498 a
megawatt-hour charged by Powerex, the trading arm of British Columbia's BC
Hydro, to $292 an hour by the DWP.

In fact, some of the biggest private power companies singled out for
criticism by Davis and other state officials--Dynegy Inc., Duke Energy and
Mirant--charged less than the average prices the state paid for the period.
Those companies' average prices ranged from $146 to $240 per megawatt-hour,
according to an analysis of the documents.

The figures cover the various types of spot and longer-term power purchased
by the state during three months that included rolling blackouts and more
than a month of razor-thin reserves, leading to continuous power
emergencies.

Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said the governor has directed his sharpest
barbs at private out-of-state generators because, in general, they have
reaped the highest profits over the longest period.

"You have to look at the whole picture," Maviglio said.

"The governor was expressing his displeasure with the arrogance of the
generators who wear cowboy hats," he said. "Their profits were 100% to 400%
above last year. . . . Just because there are other entities who are
charging us more [per megawatt-hour] doesn't change the fact that we are
getting ripped off by companies from Houston, Tulsa, Atlanta or Charlotte."

The report by the Department of Water Resources was provided to The Times
on the same day the state released 1,700 pages of documents on California's
electricity purchases on the volatile spot market for the year's first
quarter.

The records detail how the state spent nearly $8 billion buying power in
the first five months of the year, and underscore the complexity of the
state's energy problem. They also show that patterns of high prices are not
limited to a few generators.

Oscar Hidalgo, a spokesman for the water resources agency, said that the
reports together show that prices were extremely volatile early in the
year. "All the prices were high," he said, noting the downward trend in
costs since his agency began buying power in mid-January.

The average price per megawatt-hour for all state purchases went from $316
in January to $243 in May. Spot prices fell from an average of $321 per
hour to $271, the reports show.

In the first quarter of the year, some public entities' prices far exceeded
those of the biggest private companies. For example, Houston-based Enron,
one of the nation's biggest power traders, charged an average of $181 per
megawatt-hour. And Atlanta-based Mirant, which sold the most to the state,
a total of $706 million, charged an average of $225 per megawatt-hour.

By contrast, a Calgary, Canada, firm, TransAlta Energy, averaged $335 a
megawatt-hour, and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District had average
charges of $330 per megawatt-hour.

A spokesman for Enron, Mark Palmer, said recently that the "vilification of
Enron was based on politics, not facts." Spokesmen for BC Hydro could not
be reached late Monday to comment on its huge sales to the state. In the
past, the utility has defended its pricing practices, saying it has offered
last-minute hydroelectric power that helped keep California's lights on.

A spokeswoman for Sempra, the parent company of San Diego Gas & Electric,
said late Monday the company was unable to comment because it had yet to
see the figures released by the state. Officials at DWP, who could not be
reached Monday evening, have defended their pricing, saying the costs of
producing the power needed by the state were extremely high.

More Power Bought Than Projected

Hidalgo, of the Department of Water Resources, said his agency's efforts,
coupled with conservation by business and consumers and falling natural gas
prices, have begun to tame the state's market.

Still, the state had to purchase $321 million in power in April and May,
about 10% more than Davis' analysts had projected.

Hidlago said that was because of hot weather in May and other supply
problems in April. He said reports will show that power purchases fell
short of state projections in June and early July.

The reports also will show that prices paid by the state were down in June
and July, partly because spot prices have fallen sharply, often to well
under $100 a megawatt-hour.

A summary Department of Water Resources report released Monday credited
Davis' program of nurturing new power generation and establishing long-term
power contracts with with "moving the California electric energy industry
closer to normalcy."

 Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights
 Reserved.


Andy is asking for invoice information and address to complete the Services
and Indemnity Agreement.

FYI, we need the Independent director's signature from here on out for any
corporate actions so we need to try to get this Agreement finalized and
signed up today.

Thanks,
Trish.
---------------------- Forwarded by Trish Lindloff/DA/WGM/US on 11/08/2001
02:47 PM ---------------------------

"Andrew L. Stidd" <astidd@gssnyc.com> on 11/08/2001 02:04:23 PM
cc:
Subject:  NETCO Holdings

Dear Trish:

Attached is a draft of our agreement for  NETCO.  We just need invoicing
information and company addresses to  complete both agreement.

Please feel free to call me with any questions  or comments that you may
have.

Best regards.

Andy Stidd
Global Securitization Services, LLC
400  West Main Street, Suite 338
Babylon, New York 11702
(Tel.)   631 587 4700 ext. 11
(Fax)  212 302  8767
www.gssnyc.com

(See attached file: GSS Services & Indemnity Agr NETCO Hldgs.doc)

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (214-746-7700), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.

 - GSS Services & Indemnity Agr NETCO Hldgs.doc


Looks like Friday will work.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           05/09/2001 07:12 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Chris Booth/NA/Enron, Kay Mann

Subject: Re: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Before we send anything other than the "thank you" e-mail I sent to Jeff, and
before we have any conversations with GE on this point, we need to seek Kay's
guidance based on her read of the contract and the issues Jeff raised in his
letter.

Kay - will you have some time to talk about this Friday?

Regards,

Ben

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca Walker @ ENRON                           05/09/2001 01:39 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Ben

The way we actually paid the invoices changed slightly after Chris had sent
the letter to GE.  We deducted the LD's and the retention amount from the
April 25th invoice (since the May invoice was not due until May 25th).

On May 8th, a wire totalling $1,671,039 was sent to GE -- this represented
$469,000 for the c/o #2 invoice and $1,202,039 for the April 25th invoice
less the LD's and retention.

To respond to Jeff Darst's letter, we can say that we are planning on paying
the May 25th invoice in full (assuming we're not planning on deducting
additional LD's for May 8-May 25).

We just need to clarify with Jeff that both the LD and the retention were
deducted from the April invoice, and then we can deal with resolving the
issues he discusses in his letter.

Regards,
Rebecca
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron on 05/09/2001
01:22 PM ---------------------------

jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com on 05/09/2001 01:18:59 PM
To: chris.booth@enron.com
cc: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, chasecl@pssch.ps.ge.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com,
stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, Rebecca.Walker@enron.com

Subject: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Chris,

Please see attached letter, original to follow via FedEx.

 <<Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf>>
 <<Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf>>

 - Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf
 - Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf


<<Las Palmas Casitas, Todos Santos, Baja California Sur, Mexico.url>>

 http://www.mexonline.com/bcs/laspalm3.htm

 - Las Palmas Casitas, Todos Santos, Baja California Sur, Mexico.url


I understand your little boy had an accident.  I hope things are ok, family is always first - please take time off to make sure he's ok.

Louise


Before my next meeting with the Tozzini lawyers this month, I would like to
create a list of SPECIFIC products for managing Enron's Brazilian risk.
Bruce Harris is creating a list which he will forward to you shortly.  Please
review this list, comment and identify any products required for trading
prior to December 31, 1999.  Please let me hear from you if you would like to
discuss any issues in particular.  Thanks.  Sara


Hey Dave!

Thanks for your note.  Believe it or not, it actually is "good to be back."
And thanks to Louise's timely intervention, I actually get to stay in Houston
this week instead of coming over to London for the ISDA meetings.

We discussed the need to have the lawyers review the long descriptions
yesterday and Mark Dilworth is checking on whether or not all the lawyers
actually have access to the necessary programs on their machines.  He and I
are meeting later this morning to talk about several of the items in your
note and we have a meeting scheduled for tomorrow morning to show all the
lawyers involved how to use the system to review the long descriptions.

The other topics I had on my list to keep moving this week are the matching
of GTC's with products and continued progress on the Counterparty spreadsheet.

Harry Collins is the emissions guy.  I'm assuming he'll be part of this
process tomorrow and I'll ask him to take a close look at the long
descriptions and how the mesh with the GTC's.

Finally, I agree with you on the GTC variables issue.  My plan is to ask the
lawyers involved to focus on this as they review the long descriptions for
which they are responsible.  With me here to answer questions that may result
in more progress but I'm still not convinced that's enough.  I hope to be
able to spend some of my own time looking at these as you have over the last
couple of weeks but realistically I don't think that will happen very soon.
Maybe you can help me prioritize:  should I look first at areas with
predicted high volume or areas where we have the least confidence in the
quality of work to date?

Talk to you soon.

Mark

David Forster
09/14/99 07:06 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Legal Stuff

Mark,

Welcome back!

I am wondering if you could lend a hand on a few areas on the legal side of
EnronOnline:

1) GTC Cross reference (see prior email)
2) Product Long Descriptions - these are now available in the same format as
the customer will see - i.e. all put together by the system, as opposed to
individual sentences in a spreadsheet. The traders should have set up all of
the products which were required for the simulation (I haven't confirmed
this). These products would be a good place to start and should provide a
representative sample for the lawyers to look at. There are a few changes
coming, as requested by Louise Hansen, Stacy Dickson and Janice Moore which I
have not yet incorporated (but hope to within the next 2 days or so) -
otherwise, the other products should be OK as they contain text derived from
the spreadsheets which the lawyers have approved.

It would be helpful if you could organize for each of the lawyers to access
the Product Manager, so they can see the long descriptions for the Products.
Someone in the Product Control Group should be able to show you how to access
the long descriptions in the Product Manager

3) Emissions - Are you the emissions guy? I haven't actually discussed these
with anyone - not sure if the lawyer list I have includes the person who
should be looking after this?

  Mark Taylor
  Leslie Hansen
  Jeff Hodge
  Janice Moore
  Alan Aronowitz
  Harry Collins
  Stacy Dickson

4) I still do not have a warm and fuzzy feeling that the GTC variables have
been properly cross-referenced to the spreadsheets, and that the two work
together to form a cohesive whole. I might just be paranoid, but I think this
area needs closer examination. Perhaps you could spot-check a couple of GTC's
against the products and see what you think?

Thanks for your help

Dave


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
05:15 PM ---------------------------

James L Bouillion
01/25/2001 11:43 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tod A Lindholm/NA/Enron@Enron, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, John Keiser/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott, Kerry Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Elaine
Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell
Orban/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Wade Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES, Billie
Akhave/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Hutchinson/Stockton/TS/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rino T Manzano/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Roberto Figueroa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wilma
Mendiola/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jaime
Sanabria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Russell L
Appelget/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Clayton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Earline
Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Grisaffi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Cole/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Mathis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul E Parrish/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Vincent/NA/Enron@Enron, Terry
Yamada/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Property Insurance Renewal 3/1/2001

Due to adverse loss experience the insurance market is "hardening" resulting
in higher rates and more restrictive terms and conditions. Property insurance
rates are generally rising for everyone and particularly those with poor loss
experience. Unfortunately, Enron falls in the latter category. In the past,
not withstanding our loss experience, Enron has enjoyed very competitive
rates and a deductible of $500,000 for both property damage and business
interruption (traditionally, property insurance policies contain a monetary
deductible for property damage plus a day waiting period for business
interruption (normally 30 to 90 days)).  For the period 1993 through 2000
Enron paid premiums of approximately $114,100,000 and collected losses of
approximately $ 212,200.000.  This trend is continuing under the current
policy which is expiring on 3/1/2001.

Current renewal terms being offered require an estimated premium of
$17,000,000 and a deductible of $5,000,000 per loss for property damage and
business interruption. This is the lowest deductible achievable unless we are
willing to accept a waiting period for business interruption.

Realising the potential costs and budgetary and contractual implications
associated with such a change, we are continuing negotiations and seeking
alternatives to the current renewal terms. However, we should all be prepared
for an increase in premiums and the level of loss which we retain through
deductibles. I will keep you advised as these negotiations progress.

Please forward this notice to all concerned parties within your group. If
there are any questions, please give me a call at ext. 36263.


ENRON CANADA CORP.

Derek J. Davies
Vice President


Hi Jeff,

Madeleine asked that I forward this to you at this email address.  Looks
like we may have a small group going to Mendocino in September (maybes for
Pat Scatena, Madeleine and Nora, and my husband and I are definitely going).
Let me know if you are interested.

I heard back from Ricochet Ridge (from Lari's executive assistant) that
the
weekend of September 21-23 (Friday through Sunday) would work best for
them
to host an advanced group.

We should probably confirm as soon as possible, and start looking for
accommodations, given that September is a popular time in Mendocino.

Her prices this year are $195.00 per person for an all-day ride (they
generally start at 9ish and finish at around 3:30 or 4:00).  We provide
our
own lunch, or for $10 more per person, the ranch will pack us lunch.
Four-hour rides are $125.00, and can include beach, redwoods or both.
The
all-day rides are great, because you can go a little farther and get a
nice
lunch break, usually with a view.  But another option would be to do a
four-hour ride each day, selecting either beach or forest, to reduce the
cost somewhat.

Please let me know if you can make it, and what days you would like to
ride
(Friday, Saturday and/or Sunday), and whether you prefer the all-day or
four-hour option.  When I know general numbers, we can decide if we
would
like to get a house (if any are available) or if a hotel/B&B option
would
work better.

Amy Gustafson Finch
General Counsel
IASCO
1633 Old Bayshore Hwy #280
Burlingame, CA 94010
(650) 259-8400 x104 (ph)
(650) 259-8404 (fax)
afinch@iasco.com


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/23/2001 03:02
PM ---------------------------

Ernie@ECT
02/23/2001 03:01 PM
Sent by: Ernie@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Class Confirmation - Wellhead to Burner Tip

You are now enrolled in:

Wellhead to Burner Tip
Class Days and Times:
  4/24/2001  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  4/25/2001  08:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM
Room # & Location: EB 552,  Houston
Note:

Click this doclink to review class session information.

If you are unable to attend this class, the registration must be canceled by
5:00 p.m. on  April 19, 2001 to prevent a charge of $ 600 to your RC number.

 We look forward to seeing you at 08:00:00 AM on April 24 - 25, 2001.  Please
call the Development Center Team at 713-853-0357 if you have any questions.

 Thank you.


here is your payback.  Martin, Bruce's trader-made fun of his haircut last
week - woody woodpecker.  Steno over here for him and play it.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001
08:10 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Martin Cuilla                           04/06/2001 08:07 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Phillip - Please do us a favor and play this often!


ISO Market Participants:

On March 8, we notified you that the ISO had received a direct payment of
about $171 million from PG&E ($177 million less GMC obligation) with
direction from PG&E that these funds were in payment for transactions on the
ISO Controlled Grid in December 2000, scheduled by the California Power
Exchange (PX) as PG&E's Scheduling Coordinator, and invoiced to PG&E by the
PX for remittance to the ISO. We notified you further that the ISO had
placed these funds into a segregated interest-bearing account pending
resolution of their distribution.

The PX has provided notice that it has filed suit in the Central District of
California against the California ISO and moved for a temporary restraining
order (TRO), requiring the ISO to transfer these funds to the CalPX. Copies
of the complaint and the TRO application are attached below. As represented
by the PX in its complaint and moving papers, the ISO does not intend to
oppose the PX's TRO application. To the best of the ISO's knowledge, a
hearing on the TRO application has not yet been set.

Byron B. Woertz, Jr.

Director, Client Relations

(916) 608-7066

 - calpx3.doc
 - calpx4.doc
 - calpx5.doc


Notice No. 01-155
May 11, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX Division Members/Member Firms
All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
All NYMEX Division Floor Traders
All NYMEX Division Operations Managers

FROM:
George Henderson, Vice President

RE:
Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the Trading Floor and Clearing
Members
________________________________________________________________

The expiration date for the May 2001 options contract for Crude Oil (LOK1) is
Tuesday, April 17, 2001.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized
representative present at their normal work station promptly at 5:30 p.m.
until released by the Exchange staff as specified below.  All adjustments
and/or corrections, must be accompanied by relevant supporting documentation
prior to being incorporated into expiration processing, in essence making the
expiration processing an extension of the afternoon trade resolution
procedures.  All input to the NYMEX Clearing Department will conclude no
later than 30 minutes after floor representatives are released.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110), Floor Trade Correction (299-2068 and 299-2169)
personnel, as well as a representative of the Floor Committee will be
available to assist with the processing of notices of Exercise and
Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other questions or
problems you may have.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The Option Expiration process is a screen based process for which all
information is provided on the screens on C21 terminals. No Option Expiration
Reports will be provided. The following screens will assist you through the
Option Expiration process:

MEMBER TRADE INQUIRY
Contains real-time top day trade information, trade information for the
previous 4 business days and trades adjusted for the previous 4 business days
by adjustment date.

SINGLE POSITION MAINTENANCE
Contains a real-time snapshot for each option series from the start of day
position to the projected end of day position.

REVIEW ACCEPT REJECT TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfers "TO" your firm and the status of
each transfer.

REVIEW SUBMITTED TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfer "FROM" your firm and the status of
each transfer.

EXERCISE NOTICE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to exercise.

DO NOT EXERCISE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to abandon.

POSITION CHANGE SUBMISSION
PCS may be submitted either by manual input or by electronic transmission.
Any PCS input on a Clearing 21 terminal will be the input processed by the
system.  This input may be made at any time prior to 6:45 p.m.  Any PCS input
via transmission for that contract series will be disregarded.

ALL POSITIONS ARE DEEMED FINAL
Upon completion of all PCS input, all positions will be deemed final.

EXERCISE/ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Will be available to you on the Single Position Maintenance window by
contract series or the Assignment List window which contains all your
Assignments on one window. You will be notified of its availability by C21
E-Mail and by Fast Facts. This should occur within 1 hour of the last PCS
input.

All Clearing Members are required to have an authorized representative(s) at
their C21 workstations in preparation for any communication during the
expiration process.

FAST FACTS
Clearing Members should call the Fast Facts information service 301-4871,
access code 700 for event messages advising Members of the event status.

E-MAIL
Clearing Members should read their C21 E-Mail messages immediately to be
aware of event status.

The standard event Fast Facts and/or E-Mail messages and the sequence in
which they will be announced are:

Standard Event Message: Announce Out-of-the Money Exercise and In-the-Money
Do Not Exercise Submissions
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 5:45 PM
Usual Event Time: 5:45 PM
Announced via Fast Facts

Standard Event Message: Announce Final Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 6:30 PM
Usual Event Time: 6:45 PM
Announced via e-mail

Standard Event Message: All positions are deemed final
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 7:30 PM
Usual Event Time: 6:45 PM
Announced via Fast Facts

Standard Event Message: Announce Exercise/Assignment Information Available on
the Single Position Maintenance Windows
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 8:25 PM
Usual Event Time: 8:30 PM
Announced via Fast Facts and e-mail

Standard Event Message: All Report Distribution is completed
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 11:00 PM
Usual Event Time: 11:00 PM
Announced via Fast Facts

The times appearing in the Usual Event Time column are based on normal
operational conditions and could vary.

NYMEX EXPIRATION DAY PROCESSING OVERVIEW OF MEMBER REQUIREMENTS

Time: 5:30 PM
Activity: Exercise Notice Submission
Event: Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Reference Number: 1

Time: 5:30 PM
Activity: Do Not Exercise Submission
Event: Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Reference Number: 2

Time: 5:45 PM
Activity: Announce Out-of-the-Money Exercise and In-the-Money Do Not Exercise
Submissions
Event: Fast Facts Notice
Reference Number: 3

Time: 6:30 PM
Activity: Announce Final Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Event: C21 E-mail
Reference Number: 4

Time: 6:45 PM
Activity: Final Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Reference Number: 5

Time: 7:30 PM
Activity: All Positions are Deemed Final
Event: Fast Facts Notice
Reference Number: 6

Time: 8:25 PM
Activity: Announce Exercise/Assignment Information Available on the Single
Position Maintenance Windows
Event: Fast Facts Notice and C21 E-mail
Reference Number: 7

If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact Charles
V. Bebel at 299-2130, Angel Rivera at 299-2150 or Anthony Di Benedetto at
299-2152 prior to the expiration date.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-155)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Let me know if you needed additional Enron companies
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:43 AM
To:	Brackett, Debbie R.
Subject:	RE: Non-terminated deals

Yes.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brackett, Debbie R.
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:38 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Cc:	Albrecht, Kristin
Subject:	FW: Non-terminated deals

Just for gas?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:50 AM
To:	Brackett, Debbie R.
Subject:	Non-terminated deals

Debbie,

The credit committee needs to get some information from us that I could use your help with.  Can I get a dump of the non-terminated deals into excel and I will format it from there.  The information they need to see are the counterparty name, cash flows (MTM value) and positions.
As always, they need it by 11:00 this morning so if you could let me know if this is something your group could provide me with I would appreciate it.

Thanks

Kam

x3-5781


Thanks for the offer!  Lets see when we get this event scheduled and I may be
able to take you up on it.  Looks like you Utilicorp guys need to get
coordinated or I may have to play golf twice.  That would be brutal.  DF

"Hooker, David" <DHooker@UtiliCorp.com> on 05/16/2000 02:53:49 PM
To: "'Drew.Fossum@enron.com'" <Drew.Fossum@enron.com>, "Peldner, Patrick"
<PPeldner@utilicorp.com>
cc: dhill@wrf.com

Subject: RE: Golf

afternoon of June 1 works great with me.  I've "inked" you in.  Drewski,
plan to stay at the house that evening as well.  same for you David Hill if
you can make it.

no, but would love to here the story.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drew.Fossum@enron.com [SMTP:Drew.Fossum@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 2:21 PM
> To: DHooker@UtiliCorp.com; PPeldner@UtiliCorp.com
> Cc: dhill@wrf.com
> Subject: Golf
>
> How about Thursday or Friday, June 1 or 2 for a round of golf?  I'm in HOU
> all wk and the end of the wk looks pretty light.  I'd be happy to venture
> out west to your Katy/San Antonio nick of the woods if you guys are
> available.  Hill, are you gonna be in Houston around then?  If so, can you
> sneak the clubs past your wife?  Please advise.  DF
>
> PS:  I met with Paul Bieniawski and his new storage group today.  Do you
> guys know how he parted terms with the Frogs?


I have contacted the relevant people of your interest in the job.

Danny_Jones%ENRON@eott.com on 04/30/2001 01:39:56 PM
To: stan.horton@enron.com
cc:

Subject: employee referral

Dear Mr. Horton,  I have recently been made aware of a help desk analyst
job#0000108806 that has become available in your department. I am currently
employed with the aviation department (hangar attendant) of enron and would
like to use my past knowledge and experience to persue my goals in the
technology feild. I am asking respectfully if you could give me a
recommendation or referral to ETS technology department. Anything you could
do to help further my goals would be appreciated.

          Respectfully,
          Danny Jones
     281-443-3744 smithjones@ev1.net


Folks:

Hot off the press from Lee. I don't think it will be a problem to get Lee to
push the outside date to March 28, and to reduce the termination fee to $250k.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001 12:18 PM
---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 02/27/2001 11:13:21 AM
To: ben.f.jacoby@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Revised AIP and Proposal for 4 unit purchase

 <<EnronNAmerica_LM6000_units25-28_Proposal_Rev3_022601.doc>>

 <<EnronNAmerica_LM6000_units25-28_Proposal_Rev3_022601.doc>>

 <<Enron_AIP_27 Feb 01.doc>>

 - EnronNAmerica_LM6000_units25-28_Proposal_Rev3_022601.doc
 - EnronNAmerica_LM6000_units25-28_Proposal_Rev3_022601.doc
 - Enron_AIP_27 Feb 01.doc


When: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: Hennessy, Sonia; Romero, Araceli; Jackson, Brandee

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

UBS Nymex individuals will be in the office on Weds. 2/6/02, therefore, we will have this meeting at 11:00 CST.


please refer to the summary tab


Please note that the below-listed WAPA offices, which have previously been known under several names in our global counterparty database, will now be known as the names in red.

WAPA-Colorado River Storage Project Manangement Center (CRSP)  (This office is in Salt Lake City and was formerly known as Salt Lake City Area or Upper Colorado)

WAPA-Desert Southwest Region (This office is in Phoenix and was formerly know as Phoenix Area, or Lower Colorado)

WAPA-Rocky Mountain Region  (This office is in Loveland, Colorado and was formerly known as Loveland Area, Loveland-Fort Collins Area, and Lower Missouri)

WAPA-Upper Great Plains Region (This office is in Billings, MT, and was formerly known as Billings Area, Upper Missouri, and Pick-Sloan Missouri)