PADI Americas
30151 Tomas Street, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688-2125
800-729-7234, or (949) 858-7234
http://www.padi.com
-------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or change your email address, please go to
http://www.padi.com/fun/email/default.asp
-------------------------------------------------

Dear Fellow Diver;

I know I start each email with this, but WOW!  I was truly overwhelmed with
the response we received from my simple request to tell me about your diving
experiences.  We received more than 4,500 e-mails and more than 2,000 were
sent directly to me.  I did my best to answer everyone that requested a
response.  (I am still working on a few late arrivals.)

Many of you indicated that the newsletter was very America centered.  Guilty
as charged.  Despite my best efforts, I get most of my information from the
dive press and our own sources.  I did suggest to a few readers that they
become my correspondent in their perspective area.  I offer that opportunity
to all of you now.  Please feel free to send me a brief note about what is
going on in your part of the world that might interest other PADI Divers.
When appropriate and possible, I will work it into the Fellow Diver
Newsletter.  Maybe I can even get it on the website, so include pictures when
possible.

With that said, here is some more news from America, my good friend Pat
Hammer, and PADI 5 Star IDC owner in Chicago, asked me to mention the "Our
World Underwater" consumer diver in the Chicago area on April 24-27th.  So if
you are going to be any where near the windy city, go to the show.  If you
ever thought of visiting Chicago, this is the best reason in the world to
book your trip now!  Ok, I got carried away.  By the way, if you have any
events that you want to tell the dive world about, don't forget to use the
International Event Schedule in the padi.com website.  It's free, quick and
easy.

So many of you shared great diving experiences you had during the PADI
Adventures in Diving with me that I must say, the program is a hit. The way
most of you described it, it's really not a course, but an experience.  If
you haven't done so, please check it out and get the adventure of a lifetime
and your PADI Advanced Open Water Diver rating.

Your thousands of notes also informed us that we need to do a better job of
letting you know how to take the next step.  Almost half of you asked how to
take the next step towards being a dive professional (I'm not kidding!).
Well, we will be tweaking our website to make sure that everyone knows how to
become a PADI Dive Master and Instructor, what kind of jobs are available,
what kind of money can be made, and all that good stuff that you want to
know. Until then, speak will  your instructor or PADI dive center.  They'll
be able to help. PADI 5 Star IDC and CDC Centers along with Gold Palm IDC
Resorts specialize in fulfilling dreams of careers in diving.

Many of you asked about specific information about dive destinations.  The
most common question went something like this:  "I have been thinking about
going to XYZ Dive Destination, can you tell me how the diving is and where's
a good place to stay."  Well, to tell you the truth, I haven't gotten the
opportunity to dive everywhere I would like to and certainly not in as many
locations as you asked about.  However, I did give some great advice about
diving in Lake Mead, Nevada!  So this is how you find out about those great
dive locations.  Go to padi.com and look up the destination in the dive
center and resort locator.  Our network of 4,500 dive centers and resorts
would love to hear from you and answer your questions.  Your local dive
center is also an excellent source of information.  If you're still stumped,
contact PADI Travel Network and they can get you answers when no one else can.

Now I see the page break here so I know I am running long.  We promised to
bring you a special offer where we ran across a really special one so here it
is:

Blu Rivard, renowned marine artist, friend,  and  member of Project AWARE's
Honorary Board of governors is offering Dear Fellow Divers readers who are
PADI Divers and Members a 10% discount on purchases of any Fine Art Posters,
Limited Editions prints, The Wooden Gallery Process and Limited Edition
Collector plates.  Blu will donate ten percent of the proceeds directly to
the Project Aware Foundation. The first 100 prints of Free Flight fine art
posters will be hand signed by the artist for the Protect the Sharks Project!
To order your Fine Art Poster or specified Collectibles simply go to
www.blurivard.com.  Please give your PADI dive card # or membership number
next to your name for discount verification.

Lastly, I hope you're all getting ready to party in Cayman again this year
during The PADI Diving Society's Total Submersion event. This year it's from
November 8th through the 15th and we're already expecting more participants
than last year. Visit the PTN area of www.padi.com or www.sportdiver.com for
more information. By the way Sport Diver just launched their revised website.
If you haven't seen it, go by and take a look.

That's it for now. Again, thank you so much for all the great letters and
e-mails.  I truly enjoyed replying to more than 1,600 of you personally.  I
learned a lot about you and the job that PADI is doing.  Now, log off the
computer, get a friend, and go diving!

Brian
Senior Vice President, Business Development & International Business.


Harry:
Here is the financial GTC as well as the Credit Provisions that we sometimes
attach.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Congratulations!  For an unprecedented five years in a row, Enron has been
ranked the "Most Innovative Company in America" by Fortune magazine.  In
addition, for the first time, Enron has also been ranked #1 in "Quality of
Management," topping General Electric and Omnicom Group, and our "Employee
Talent" has been ranked #2, behind Goldman Sachs and ahead of Cisco
Systems.   America's most admired management team is paired with the best and
brightest employee talent.  That winning combination has led to Enron's
five-year "Most Innovative" sweep.  The "Most Admired" list will appear in
Fortune's Feb. 21 issue, available on newsstands Feb. 8.

You are the reason we have achieved such consistent recognition.  You bring
the innovative ideas to Enron and create new business opportunities.  You
contribute to our quality management team.  And you are the outstanding
employee talent that makes Enron such an exciting and successful company.

Keep up your outstanding work, and we look forward to even greater
achievements in 2000!


----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 08:06 AM -----

	RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
	10/25/2000 08:01 AM

		 To: tom.briggs@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: Gramm Proposed Changes

Please find attached Part 1 of  <<Gramm changes 1.pdf>> the proposed changes
from Gramm staff to the House passed version of the CEA bill.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Gramm changes 1.pdf


Please find attached our Weekly Report (6th October 2000) for your perusal
and information.

Regards,

Beverley


Will be there.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 5:57 PM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Subject:	FW: Risk Operations

Can you join me in the 4:00 pm meeting on Tuesday?  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 4:26 PM
To:	Neal, Scott; Beck, Sally; Will, Lloyd
Subject:	Risk Operations

All,
I received a call from Sally Beck today alerting me to concerns about spreading the risk group across the floor (gas team - power team).  From a control perspective she prefers that the team be all together.

Can you factor this in and give Sally and me your thoughts as well?  Perhaps we could find an area that is more central to both groups that will help with this (as we've done with fundies).

Scott and I are meeting Tuesday afternoon at 4:00 - Lloyd and Sally are you free to join us to keep us all on the same page?  Please let me know so I can reserve a room.

Tammy


How about the Lay's wednesday?


skean@enron.com

is the correct email address for Steve Kean

Thanks.

"Kathy Wells" <kathy@downtowndistrict.org> on 09/14/2000 01:20:40 PM
Please respond to "Kathy Wells" <kathy@downtowndistrict.org>
To: <cgeorghiou@pgal.com>, <whpace@pgal.com>, <robert@phonoscope.com>,
<rbrowning@phonoscope.com>, <dcaddle@phonoscope.com>, <bturnerrst@aol.com>,
<alex-barrera@reliantenergy.com>, <ralph_hart@icgcom.com>, <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Correct address?

Recently, Tom Davis with the Downtown Management District has experienced
some difficulty with sending email to the address he has on file for each of
you.  Please respond to this message to verify your correct address.  Thanks.


Richard --

PG&E and SCE (along with TURN) filed at FERC seeking refunds.  As Seabron
highlights below, I wouldn't put it pass them if they already have an idea of
who to "charge" for this summer.

Last I remember, we were not too concerned about the utilities filing in
state court seeking redress.  Given that the undercollection number is
approaching $4 billion, I just want to make sure that we have thought about
this angle.  The utilities are going to start trying to fix their problem in
every way possible (I sure as hell would if I were them).

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 10/18/2000 11:14 AM -----

	"Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com>
	10/17/2000 04:39 PM

		 To: <Mary.Hain@enron.com>, <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: PG&E/SCE filing

Mary and Jim:

Did you see in the PG&E/SCE filing that the two companies have kindly
volunteered (p. 32) to "assist the Commission in developing a full record
and in undertaking the rigorous analysis needed to fix the problems in the
California markets and determine refund responsibility". How kind and
public-spirited of them. More seriously, I would expect that they already
have a full economic analysis going on prices, damages, etc.

Seab

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com


that works


Although this entity was sold earlier this year, an announcement e-mail was not issued at that time due to lack of complete documentation.

On March 30, 2001, Fountain Valley Power, L.L.C. (87V-FVPL) sold; 100 percent of the ownership interest was assigned to Black Hills Fountain Valley, L.L.C.

Please share with interested individuals within your groups.

Corporate Records - - Evidence to be hand delivered.

Lori Pinder
Supervisor, Corporate Services
and Assistant Secretary
1400 Smith St., Room 4802
Houston, Texas 77002
713.853-7291
713.646.8007 (Fax)


-----Original Message-----
From: Minter, Kimberly R (PS, SSEP)
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 3:16 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
Subject: Ben Jacoby Letter

g            S&S Energy Products
_____________________________________

                                                           A GE Power
Systems Business
Kimberly Minter
Marketing Coordinator

2707 North Loop West, Houston, TX 77008
Phone: 713-803-0316
Fax: 713-869-8365

 - Ben Jacoby.pdf


THIS IS A POST-ONLY MAILING.  PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL.

Future Technology

DATE	      MTFAX	MTFBX	MTFTX

03/18/2002	$4.46	$4.38	$3.96
03/19/2002	$4.49	$4.41	$3.99
03/20/2002	$4.33	$4.25	$3.85
03/21/2002	$4.45	$4.37	$3.95
03/22/2002	$4.38	$4.31	$3.90
For more info click below
http://www.munder.com/munder/0,,MS1YLTE3MC0xLVdOLU1GRg==,00.html

Framlington Healthcare

DATE	      MFHAX	MFHBX	MFHCX

03/18/2002	$20.56	$19.77	$19.76
03/19/2002	$20.56	$19.78	$19.76
03/20/2002	$20.29	$19.52	$19.50
03/21/2002	$20.60	$19.82	$19.80
03/22/2002	$20.51	$19.73	$19.71
For more info click below
http://www.munder.com/munder/0,,MS1YLTE3MC03LVdOLU1GRg==,00.html

NetNet

DATE	      MNNAX	MNNBX	MNNCX

03/18/2002	$16.30	$15.85	$15.86
03/19/2002	$16.32	$15.87	$15.88
03/20/2002	$15.57	$15.14	$15.15
03/21/2002	$16.03	$15.59	$15.60
03/22/2002	$15.86	$15.42	$15.43
For more info click below
http://www.munder.com/munder/0,,MS1YLTE3MC0yMS1XTi1NRkY=,00.html

International NetNet

DATE	      MNIAX	MNIBX	MNITX

03/18/2002	$2.56	$2.52	$2.52
03/19/2002	$2.56	$2.52	$2.52
03/20/2002	$2.53	$2.50	$2.50
03/21/2002	$2.53	$2.50	$2.50
03/22/2002	$2.51	$2.48	$2.48
For more info click below
http://www.munder.com/munder/0,,MS1YLTE3MC0zMi1XTi1NRkY=,00.html

Digital Economy

DATE	      MDEAX	MDEBX	MDENX

03/18/2002	$6.28	$6.20	$6.22
03/19/2002	$6.29	$6.21	$6.22
03/20/2002	$6.18	$6.10	$6.11
03/21/2002	$6.21	$6.13	$6.15
03/22/2002	$6.17	$6.09	$6.11
For more info click below
http://www.munder.com/munder/0,,MS1YLTE3MC0zMy1XTi1NRkY=,00.html

Bio(Tech)2

DATE	      MBTAX	MBTBX	MBTTX

03/18/2002	$5.76	$5.69	$5.71
03/19/2002	$5.75	$5.69	$5.70
03/20/2002	$5.61	$5.55	$5.56
03/21/2002	$5.79	$5.72	$5.74
03/22/2002	$5.75	$5.68	$5.70
For more info click below
http://www.munder.com/munder/0,,MS1YLTE3MC0zNC1XTi1NRkY=,00.html

If you have any questions, please call 1-800-4-MUNDER.

This is a post-only mailing.  Please do not respond to this e-mail.

For a response to any other Munder Funds related correspondence, please send an e-mail to fundcontact@munder.com.

For a prospectus containing more complete information about The Munder Funds, including charges and expenses, please contact your financial advisor or call 1-800-4-MUNDER or visit http://munder.esourcelink.net. Please read it carefully before you invest or send money. Distributor: Funds Distributor, Inc. 11/01

To unsubscribe from this list, please click the hyperlink below:
    http://www.munder.com/munder/0,,MS1YLTE3MS0xLWMzTm9ZV05yYkVCbGJuSnZiaTVqYjIwPS1SLTE=,00.html


Start Date: 4/14/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041411.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_TOBY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SPP
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: 170.00 / Final: 160.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: CALP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:   9.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: NCPA
  PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Please find attached the above article from the European Electricity Report, September 3, 2001.

Kind Regards
Sarimah Black


He didn't invite me.  He don't know what's good for him does he?  AND he
lives in a bad neighborhood.

Matthew B Fleming@EES
03/26/2001 04:50 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: Party time

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES on 03/26/2001
05:50 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  James R Barker                           03/26/2001 01:40 PM
	Phone No: 713 853-3437

To: East Gas Desk, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Reynolds/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wiltfong/HOU/EES@EES, Laura R Arnold/HOU/EES@EES, Ruby Robinson/HOU/EES@EES,
Monica Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, Joseph Des Champs/HOU/EES@EES, Jesus
Guerra/HOU/EES@EES, C Kyle Griffin/HOU/EES@EES, Amanda Boettcher/HOU/EES@EES,
Deborah D Merril/HOU/EES@EES, mgarred@newpower@EES, ssharma@newpower@EES,
Thomas J Donovan/HOU/EES@EES, PannellO@firstenergycorp.com @ ENRON,
jweison@houstonisd.org, Katrin Haux/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Valerie Villareal/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Reese/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Party time

Well, the time has finally arrived............after purchasing some bean bag
and inflatable 'Southpark' chairs, I'm officially ready for a party.  Won't
you please come  over and share in a few cocktails.   This Saturday, March 31
at 7:30,  1314 Utah St.  (corner of Truro and Utah, near Memorial Park)   I
will have beverages and snacks, but as in the past, no jello shots or Busch
beer.  (sorry Matt and Mike)

Most of you aren't aware of where I live, but parking could be a problem.
(sorry, no valet)   In the 'hood', people tend to park wherever they can,
this being along all the streets surrounding the house as well as the
volleyball courts at Bubbas.  Park wherever you can.

Please see the attached map or go to Yahoo Maps for assistance.  It works
well if you use 1380 Utah St.  (Don't ask why)    Please pass this on to
others that I may have overlooked.  Call if you have any questions.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

December 08, 2000 5:00pm through December 11, 2000 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

EI:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: HR   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: UNIX     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: REMEDY
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  RmailSniffer
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Review of Mail logs has shown that between 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.
50% of mail messages fail.  The update will copy failed messages to another
directory for an admin to process.
Backout: Reset RmailSniffer service to original settings.
Contact(s):  Carlos Perez    713-345-708
  Christian Smerz   713-345-7410

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]


Phillp:  here is Richard's revised letter.  Let me know what you think.
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 02:46
PM ---------------------------

Richard D Rathvon@ENRON
12/04/2000 12:02 PM
Sent by: Richard Rathvon@ENRON
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: West Coast Gas

Attached is the e-mail that I revised pursuant to our discussions.  I have
also sent to Bob Carter, the ENA lawyer on the National Gypsum deal.  As you
can see, he does not see any issues that would prevent sending to my contact
at National Gypsum.

Do you have additional comments or changes?

(Also, I will pursue getting the name of the entity that sent it to National
Gypsum.)
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Rathvon/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000
12:04 PM ---------------------------

Bob.Carter@enron.com on 12/04/2000 10:46:29 AM
To: Richard.D.Rathvon@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: West Coast Gas

Looks good to me.

                    Richard D
                    Rathvon@ENRON        To:     Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT
                    Sent by:             cc:
                    Richard              Subject:     Re: West Coast
Gas(Document link: Bob Carter)
                    Rathvon@ENRON

                    12/04/2000
                    10:36 AM

I want to send this to our customer, National Gypsum, but thought you
should review prior to it going out.  Do you have any comments?

I've talked with several people familar with gas sales and distribution in
the southwestern portion of the US.  Summarized below is their collective
response:

     1.   The pipeline capacity is limited due to an order by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and FERC has jurisdiction over the
interstate sale and distribution of natural gas.  The Department of
Transportation has jursidiction only over certain safety issues resulting
from the gas explosion.
     2.   The spot market has risen in the Arizona area -- currently it is
at $  17.11__ for 30-day _Jan'01__.  The reason prices are high is due to the
excessive demand in California for natural gas for its power plants.  Thus,
gas is flowing into California -- the only way gas will flow east away from
California is in response to higher prices.
     3.   Enron is not "holding back supplies to the area".  Enron is not a
producer of natural gas, does not have ANY physical supplies, and does not
have or utilize storage capacity in this area.  Also, Enron controls
pipeline capacity over the El Paso Gas Pipeline of only 80,000 cf per day
-- this pipeline has a capacity of 4 BILLION cf per day (at full capacity).
The dominant holder of capacity on this pipleline is a gas marketing
subsidiary of El Paso Gas.  Moreover, there are numerous marketers of
natural gas in the area, ensuring competition and pricing visibility and
liquidity.  Thus, there is no way that Enron could control or influence the
price of physical suppliles in the area.
     4.   Gas trading generally occurs over monthly or seasonal (e.g.,
winter) periods, not annual periods.  And, the winter season for which
marketers generally quote prices is considered to be November to March (not
on December 1 as the note below suggests).
     5.   Finally, Enron would not want to hold back physical supplies to
the area.  Enron is primarily a trader of natural gas, engaged in the
buying and selling of the non-physical and financial side of natural gas
supplies.  Through Enron On Line, Enron is both a seller AND a buyer,
making margins on trades of positions in natural gas.   Thus, Enron would
be disadvantaged by not selling gas positions, even if it could hold back
physical supplies to the area, because it is not engaged in buying and
selling of positions in natural gas.

"Lowe, Carol" <CPLowe@NationalGypsum.com> on 11/30/2000 04:46:56 PM

To:   "Richard D. Rathvon (E-mail)" <Richard.D.Rathvon@enron.com>
cc:   "Kellie Metcalf (E-mail)" <kellie_metcalf@enron.net>

Subject:  West Coast Gas

Rich,

The following information was included in an email that was sent to our
executives and CEO.  The tone leaves a negative impression for Enron.  Can
you or someone at Enron comment on Enron's role or lack thereof with
respect
to this item?  I am afraid this will taint our plans if not addressed
quickly.  I want to circulate Enron's side of the story.

Carol

Excerpt from email circulated today:

Due to the lingering effects of the August gas pipeline explosion in New
Mexico that killed 10 people, coupled with some possible market
manipulation
by Enron, we're facing a potential problem at Phoenix in the short term and
possibly all three western plants longer term.  The pipeline which is owned
by El Paso Gas is back in operation, but is being limited to 50% of
capacity.  Weather has turned cold, spiking demand for gas in the region.
Enron appears to be holding back supplies to the area until at least
December 1st, when many of its contracts set the index price for the
following year.  Consequently, gas prices on the spot market in Arizona are
hitting $25 per MMBTU.  The situation has caused several marketers to
declare force majeure.  If our marketer does so, we'll be curtailed.  As
you
probably know, we don't have any backup fuel capabilities at these three
plants.  The U.S. Dept of Transportation controls this and is reported to
be
getting involved.  Will keep you posted as it unfolds.


Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Apparently-To: djunk_epc@yahoo.com via web20508.mail.yahoo.com; 20 Nov 2001 08:29:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from sm10.texas.rr.com (24.93.35.222)  by mta590.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2001 08:29:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Default (cs662534-54.houston.rr.com [66.25.34.54])	by sm10.texas.rr.com (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) with SMTP id fAKGTcdg027098;	Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:29:41 -0600
From: "linda uselman" <luselman@houston.rr.com>
To: "Dan Junk" <djunk_epc@yahoo.com>,   "Dennis & Judy Theisen" <theisen@wcta.net>,   "John O'Hearn" <john.o'hearn@elpaso.com>,   "Ben Uselman" <buselman@bruco.com>, "Gary Bush" <gary.bush@enron.com>,   "Jeff Harrison" <jeff.harrison@mail.house.gov>,   "Jen & David Harrison" <JBryHarrison@aol.com>,   "Lisa Fawcett" <lfawcett@enron.com>,   "Mark Neuerburg" <NeuerbuM@kochind.com>,   "Melinda Meyer" <mmeyer@ei.enron.com>,   "Mike Smith" <Mike.L.Smith@enron.com>
Subject: FW: happy thanksgiving
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:31:11 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Importance: Normal
Content-Length: 2437

> HOW FORTUNATE WE ARE...
>
> If we could shrink the earth's population to a
> village of precisely 100 people, with all the existing
>
> human ratios remaining the same, it would look
> something like the following:
>
> There would be:
> 57 Asians
> 21 Europeans
> 8 Africans
> 14 from the Western Hemisphere, both north and south
>
> 52 would be female
> 48 would be male
>
> 70 would be non-white
> 30 would be white
>
> 70 would be non-Christian
> 30 would be Christian
>
> 89 would be heterosexual
> 11 would be homosexual
>
> 6 people would possess 59% of the entire world's
> wealth and all 6 would be from the United States.
>
> 80 would live in substandard housing
> 70 would be unable to read
> 50 would suffer from malnutrition
> 1 would be near death; 1 would be near birth
> 1 (yes, only 1) would have a college education
> 1 would own a computer
>
> When one considers our world from such a compressed
> perspective, the need for acceptance, understanding
> and
> education becomes glaringly apparent. The following is
>
> also something to ponder...
>
> If you woke up this morning with more health than
> illness...you are more blessed than the million who
> will
> not survive this week.
>
> If you have never experienced the danger of battle,
> the loneliness of imprisonment, the agony of torture,
> or the pangs of starvation you are ahead of 500
> million
> people in the world.
>
> If you can attend a church meeting without fear of
> harassment, arrest, torture, or death...you are more
> blessed than three billion people in the world.
>
> If you have food in the refrigerator, clothes on
> your back, a roof overhead and a place to sleep...you
> are
> richer than 75% of this world.
>
> If you have money in the bank, in your wallet, and
> spare change in a dish someplace ... you are among the
>
> top 8% of the world's wealthy.
>
> If your parents are still alive and still married you
> are
> very rare, even in the United States and Canada.
>
> If you can read this message, you just received a
> double blessing in that you are more blessed than over
>
> two billion people in the world that cannot read at
> all.
>
>
> Work like you don't need the money.
> Love like you've never been hurt.
> Dance like nobody's watching.
> Sing like nobody's listening.
> Live like it's Heaven on Earth.
>
> And, have a Happy Thanksgiving!
>


There will be no formal rockies fundies today since i will be in the air...general discussion with Frank and Steve along with Canada will work for this week.

Jay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:33 AM
To:	Holst, Keith; Smith, Matt; Reitmeyer, Jay; Rangel, Ina
Subject:	Wed Gas Fundies Meeting

Keith and I discussed working towards this meeting being organized every week.  We would like the meeting to begin at 3:00 and to have all interested parties (Canada and Portland) dialed in to AT&T.  I would like the meeting room cleared and the handouts to be emailed before the meeting begins.  Please work towards emailing everyone an itinerary each week.

You guys are making great progress with the fundies information.  Nice work.

Thanks,
Mike


Congratulations to you all on an exceptional effort in getting the Harrah's
electricity deal closed! I know it was tough managing through the  internal
issues- contract language, tariff/power pricing curve adjustments,etc- but it
was the right thing to do and both the deal and Enron is much better off.

Marty, Ken, Sean- Great job in keeping the customer at the table and still
getting them to execution given all the changes in the last two weeks.

Great job by all....congrats!


You might hear from Mac tonight (hope so!).  You can give him my cell phone
for when he gets in, and we can leave a key under the doormat.

Gotta go meet Mark.

Love,

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 02/01/2001 04:50:21 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: 2FEB NEWARK TO HOUSTON----ETKT

Great! This will give you some free time a home.
I love you, NM

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 4:24 PM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: 2FEB NEWARK TO HOUSTON----ETKT

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/01/2001 04:23
PM ---------------------------

Julie Hunt <jhunt_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 02/01/2001 01:00:46 PM

To:   KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM
cc:

Subject:  2FEB NEWARK TO HOUSTON----ETKT

                                                   SALES AGT: JH/YMFDX2

                                          MANN/C KAY

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  KAY MANN X57566

  DATE:  FEB 01 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  02FEB NEWARK NJ      HOUSTON TX     800A    1115A
CO 205     A          FRI   NEWARK INTL    G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL C
                            BREAKFAST                     NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         4:15 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: MC DONNELL DOUGLAS DC-10-30/40
                          SEAT UPGRADED 9A

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/LRHLXT

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
**CONTINENTAL RECORD LOCATOR: LRHLXT
ETKT NBR 005-7024437073
FARE $1020.75
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Andrew Lewis' Portfolio No. 1 at StockSelector.com
For Tuesday, June 05, 2001

To view your portfolio online, please go to
http://www.stockselector.com/portfolio.asp?portnumber=1

***********
FREE BROKER RESEARCH REPORT
Is Coke it? Coca-Cola Co. (KO) Analysts at Prudential Securities give
Coca-Cola Co. (KO) a STRONG BUY rating. Comparing the current industry slump to a similar situation in 1994, they say that the soft-drink company is
positioned to take advantage of an improved environment. Please go to
http://www.multexinvestor.com/ACHome.asp to download the free broker
research report.
***********
			Previous		Today's		Dollar		Percent
Name			Close			Close			Change		Change
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMES DEPARTMENT	$2.62			$2.68			$0.06			2.29%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=AMES

SYNAGRO TECH IN	$2.64			$2.66			$0.02			0.76%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=SYGR

FREEREALTIME.CO	$0.03			$0.04			$0.01			16.67%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=FRTI

MPHASE TECH INC	$2.43			$2.33			($0.10)		-4.12%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=XDSL

STARNET COMM IN	$0.93			$0.93			$0.00			0.00%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=SNMM

TOTAL ENTERTAIN	$0.14			$0.14			$0.00			2.94%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=TTLN

SYNAGRO TECH IN	$2.64			$2.66			$0.02			0.76%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=SYGR

FCCN not found	N/A 			N/A   	N/A  	N/A
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=FCCN

BEST BUY CO INC	$54.41		$56.70		$2.29			4.21%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=BBY

AMERITRADE HOLD	$8.50			$8.90			$0.40			4.71%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=AMTD

GIC GLOBAL INTE	$0.01			$0.01			$0.00			0.00%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=GGNC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portfolio Total				$11,485.60		$303.50		2.71%

	Dow Jones Indusrial Average	9,999.00		0.00			0.00%
	S & P 500				1,283.56		24.20			1.92%
	NASDAQ Composite			2,233.64		77.71			3.60%
	Russell 2000			516.48		9.16			1.81%
	Wilshire Index			787.12		12.75			1.65%

To unsubscribe or modify any other options, please go to http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?symbol=1

? Copyright 1999, StockSelector.com


The docs should be with Carolyn Gilley in Contract Records.


To: Marc Eichmann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:


Attached is a revised ENA telephone list.  Thanks to everyone who provided me
with updated information.  Your cooperation was greatly appreciated.
Please keep me apprised of any future changes.


why not

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           12/28/2000 09:09 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hey we could get a break.  Jim Coffey just called and is under the assumption
that our $202 million does not include costs from the Interest Rate group.
Do you think we should tack on $5 mil and try to run that through?


nyuck nyuck nyuck...  :-)

From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/10/2001 03:18 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: McCuistion Program

lemme guess.  you were a standup comic in another life?


Ben please deal with.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stanley, Brian
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Jacoby, Ben
Subject:	Engine purchase

A Rita Garcia 202 965 6167 is interested in buying engines will you pleasegive her a call.
Brian
G. Brian Stanley
Office 713.345.5183
Fax 713.646.6022


testing 1 2 3.


Possible Rotating Blackouts Beginning at 2:30 P.m. Today; Outages Required
Due to Supply Limitations

FOLSOM, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 31, 2001--The California Independent
System Operator (California ISO) is notifying the public of the possibility
of rotating customer outages beginning around 2:30 p.m. today, Thursday, May
31, 2001.

Conservation efforts will help lessen the severity and duration of possible
outages. All Californians are urged to rededicate their efforts to save as
much energy as possible during this emergency situation. Please monitor the
ISO website at www.caiso.com under System Conditions for updates.

Specific information about the location and timing of the outages must be
obtained from the local utilities. California ISO anticipates reaching a peak
load of 37,882 megawatts at approximately 4:00 p.m. this evening. Stage One
and Stage Two Emergencies remain in effect all day, until 12 midnight.

???????ISO TELECONFERENCE CALL

???????Time: ??????????????????3:00 p.m.
???????Phone: ?????????????????1-800-374-1387
???????Passcode: ??????????????ISO News

Stage Three of the state's Electrical Emergency Plan (EEP) is required when
operating reserves fall below one-and-a-half percent. The California ISO's
EEP is part of the state's enhanced reliability standards created by landmark
legislation Assembly Bill 1890, which restructured California's electricity
industry.

California ISO is charged with managing the flow of electricity along the
long-distance, high-voltage power lines that make up the bulk of California's
transmission system. The not-for-profit public-benefit corporation assumed
the responsibility in March, 1998, when California opened its energy markets
to competition and the state's investor-owned utilities turned their private
transmission power lines over to the California ISO to manage. The mission of
the California ISO is to safeguard the reliable delivery of electricity,
facilitate markets and ensure equal access to a 12,500 circuit mile "electron
highway."

Other helpful contacts:

Pacific Gas and Electric, 415/973-5930 Southern California Edison,
626/302-2255 San Diego Gas and Electric, 877/866-2066

???CONTACT: California ISO, Folsom
????????????Stephanie McCorkle, 888/516-NEWS
????????????Director of Communications


Kate, could you ask Tom if this transaction is suppose to be Firm in Enpower.
Their confirmation says Non-Firm, Transmission Contingent. Could you ask him
which is correct?


It's OK to delay the materials for Duffie. He is very busy anyway and is not
going to complain.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001
05:23 PM ---------------------------

Scott Salmon@ENRON
04/24/2001 01:23 PM
To: Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/Enron@EnronXGate, Ben
Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT, George Albanis/LON/ECT@ECT, Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Having Iris visit London

Hi Amitava,

We've been doing some thinking and discussing here regarding the information
on our modelling process we'll provide to Darryl Duffie.  We think it would
be extremely valuable for Iris to come out to London for a couple weeks to
gain a better understanding of the how the models integrate and are truly
employed.  I think this would greatly enhance the "product" we'll send to
Duffie as well as giving Iris a firm view of Enron Credit.  In addition, she
could also explore some of the data sources such as Amadeus and others that
might be helpful in private firm modelling.  If we're extremely
efficient/lucky in receiving data from D&B or Experian, she might be able to
begin analysis on that for the private model efforts.

I would recommend she plan on coming out for 2 weeks starting the week of 30
Apr perhaps.  Depending on the progress with the private firm data sources,
it probably makes sense to send her back to Houston to work on calibration
sets with a likely return visit to London as required.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Cheers,
Scott


John,  Looks fine to me.


The report named: VaR and Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=22&report_name=VaR+and+Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/24/2001>, published as of 10/24/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Just wanted to make sure you received this.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000 10:09
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Joan Veselack @ ENRON                           01/27/2000 07:38 PM

To: hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc: mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com, knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TCO STOW Overage - 1/24

Kara/Heidi, please give this to Brian and Melissa.

Because the burns significantly increased on 1/24 from the forecasted amount
(+16749). Contract #63281 was over-run and Storage #51407 was over-withdrawn.
Contract over-run is $.21 per dkt and storage over-withdrawls are $10 per dkt.

Because the forecast was lower, I let Joann use the extra space for CES
Enduser Market. TCO will let me cut gas to CES Enduser Markets as a retro.
Not sure if you want this gas to flow or try to make it up over the weekend.
If you need the gas to flow because of OFO penalties, maybe the storage
over-withdrawal is cheaper than incurring OFO penalties. Please tell me what
you want me to do. Need to do the retro's ASAP while TCO is still feeling
generous.

FYI, the traders at Enron talked to Noel Bartlo on Tuesday. Noel said any
costs over the space that retail had (134,710 for choice), Enron had the
right to pass on the costs. I really hope the Noel communicated that to CES
Retail. I would hate to have a huge misunderstanding between Enron and CES
Retail. Remember, we schedulers are caught in the middle... and don't try to
cause unnecessary pain.

63281/236 coh 7-1  2934/2872
63281/170 coh 7-5  1922/1881
63281/99 coh 5-2  427/418
63281/221 cpa8-35 1639/1604
63281/220 cpa8-35 511/500

Total    7433/7275


Please find attached the following article/s:
'New ChemConnect stirs the pot' - Chemical Week

Kind Regards,
Kuldeep Chana


The report named: CE P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=4&report_name=CE+P/L&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/29/2001>, published as of 10/29/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Chris --  As we discussed,   I have changed the transport usage tickets for all the  FT  and  IT  contracts  to now have  TP1  as the primary desk effective  October 1st.

Jeanne Wukasch
ext.  58495

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:37 AM
To:	Singla, Kimat
Cc:	Halstead, Lia; Fletcher, Brenda H.; Wukasch, Jeanne
Subject:	TGT for October

I moved the sale to NYPA at Mamou from TP3 to TP1 effective 10/1/2001.  The old deal number is 815952.  The new deal number is 1063956.

Kimat, I just took the volumes to 0 effective 10/1/2001 on deal 815952.  Should we just delete the lines on the deal ticket for dates after 10/1/2001?

Effective 10/1/2001, the primary desk for transport on TGT will be TP1.


Please read this e:mail.  Important detailed information provided.

Hi everyone:

I  want to follow-up with each of you on some details for the upcoming
Government Affairs-The Americas meeting on Friday, March 9.  First thing,
your contacts for this upcoming meeting will be Linda Noske (x36082)  &
Geriann Warner (x35036).  After Tuesday, February 27, I will be out of the
office and unavailable until Monday, March 12. (Aloha!)

The meeting will take place at the Woodlands Resort in the "Lakeside Room" on
Friday, March 9.  A continental breakfast will be available at 7:30am with
the meeting beginning promptly at 8:00am and concluding by 3:00pm (see
attached agenda).

The Woodlands Resort
2301 North Millbend Drive
The Woodlands, TX  77380
Phone# 281-367-1100
Fax# 281-364-6274
Check-In time is 3:00pm
Check-Out time is 12:00pm
(see attached map)

For those of you who will be staying overnight, as an overnight guest at The
Woodlands Resort, you are entitled to dinner the evening of March 8th and
breakfast the next morning at the Woodlands Dining Room.   You must let the
server know that your meal should be charged to the Enron master account.
This service is part of the meeting package that Enron has agreed to.  If you
have any questions, please feel free to call Linda or Geriann.

The Woodlands Resort provides transportation to and from the airport.
Assistants/Coordinators, please schedule any transportation with the resort
directly, their number is 281-364-6256.  PARKING: Valet parking is not
available, you will need to park in a parking lot on site.

ATTIRE:  Friday Casual

Below, you will find a list of names with date of arrival/departure for those
needing overnight accommodations.  Please check this list for accuracy and
get back with me ASAP if changes are needed.

gngr
713-853-7751


Final version.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000
04:02 PM ---------------------------

12/19/2000 03:58 PM
Bernadette Hawkins
Bernadette Hawkins
Bernadette Hawkins
12/19/2000 03:58 PM
12/19/2000 03:58 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Campaign Proposal-Supporting Federal Legislation Restructuring the
Electric Utility Industry

FYI
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 12/19/2000 05:01 PM -----

	"Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>
	12/18/2000 05:56 PM

		 To: <Jkellihers@aol.com>
		 cc: <jhartso@enron.com>
		 Subject: Campaign Proposal-Supporting Federal Legislation Restructuring the
Electric Utility Industry

Joe, Linda Robertson and Joe Hartsoe of Enron asked me to forward to you the
attached comments and answers of Enron on the subject document.  It is in
WordPerfect 8.  If you need to have it converted to another format, please
let me know: 202-828-5851.  Hope all is well and congratulations on landing a
position with LeBoeuf.

Dan

 - 0135652.01


Bill, any delays on this project are NOT from the env. matrix.  I received
the matrix from the team sometime last week (tuesday -thursday) when I was
out of town on business.  When I came back on friday, I completed the matrix
and sent it back to the team.  Any delays on this issue are from the team,
not from me.  As I remember the project, it involved work on the right of way
and therefore was covered by the blankets we have for SHPO and F&W.  There
were no project delays in terms of permits or approvals......

William.Kendrick.enronXgate@enron.com on 05/20/2001 08:12:13 AM
To: Larry.Campbell@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Mewborne - Quercho Bone Springs Unit - Sec 23-18S-32E

Larry--

Any thoughts on this?  Please respond to me only.

Thanks, Bill
 -----Original Message-----
From:     Rice, Randy
Sent:     Wednesday, May 16, 2001 4:09 PM
To:       Kendrick, William; Clark, Scott
Subject:  FW: Mewborne - Quercho Bone Springs Unit - Sec 23-18S-32E

We continue to have some "attitude" from this person in scheduling for
EOTT. I thought you may be able to work with Scott and is people on a
process to make this better.
R2

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Clark, Scott
Sent:     Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:41 PM
To:       Rice, Randy
Subject:  Mewborne - Quercho Bone Springs Unit - Sec 23-18S-32E

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Clark/OTS/Enron on 05/16/2001
03:40 PM ---------------------------

(Embedded image moved to file: pic00041.pcx)
Lance Nash @ EOTT on 05/15/2001 10:48:39 AM

To:   Wade Jordan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Scott Clark/OTS/Enron@ENRON,
      ronny.davenport@enron.com@Eott
cc:

Subject:  Mewborne - Quercho Bone Springs Unit - Sec 23-18S-32E

Wade - As you're probably aware of by now, on April 2nd, Carl Eby with
Phillips called inquiring about a possible tie-in of the subject unit to
our "Young Deep" pipeline system we acquired from Koch.  A question arose
as to whether or not a west to east spur existed off the north/south
mainline which would be near the unit.  It was initially conveyed to me
that ETS would take a backhoe out to the mainline to make this
determination.  I have since learned that this has been delayed due to the
need for an "environmental matrix", whatever that may be.  The roads to
this unit are in extremely poor condition, and the operator would like to
pipeline connect if possible.  Production is represented at 300 bpd.

A couple of issues:

1)  Could someone explain to me the process involved in an "env. matrix",
and why it take 2 months to determine if we have a pipeline in the ground?
Is someone with ETS in Houston delaying this, if so, who is the responsible
party?
2)  Tariff on this system (NMSCC #17) is 50 cents/bbl at this time, plus
PLA.  From the maps I have, it appears this system consists of around 10 to
12 miles of gathering and mainline.  Current production on the system is
around 115 bpd of WTI, or $23,000/yr monetized.  The pipe in the ground is
fairly new from what I've been told by my contact at Koch.  If we can
manage to tie this well in, revenue would be raised an additional
$60,000/year at current tariff rates.  What costs are currently associated
with this system?  A decision needs to be made on the economic feasibility
of keeping it operable given the current tariff rates and current/proposed
throughput, or the rates needed to keep the system viable.

Bottom line, Phillips and the producer need an answer, one way or the
other, so they can get on with the business of safely transporting this
crude oil.  EOTT Pipeline needs an answer, one way or the other, so we can
decide how to best manage this system.

Any assistance in moving this forward and allowing EOTT to maintain some
image of credibility would be appreciated.  I would also like to pass along
my appreciation of Rick Cribbs and the information he has been able to
provide thusfar.

Lance Nash
Commercial Manager
EOTT Energy Pipeline L.P.
(713) 993-5296
lance.nash@eott.com

 - pic00041.pcx


Yea! Yea! Yea! Yea!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vuittonet, Laura
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 4:34 PM
To:	Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	RE: Interview for Brian Redmond

Well, it looks like I'm going to have to reschedule this interview another day because Brian would like for Tom to meet the candidate as well.

I'll keep ya posted!
Laura

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 4:23 PM
To:	Vuittonet, Laura
Subject:	RE: Interview for Brian Redmond

OK with me. Please put on my calendar if its for sure!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vuittonet, Laura
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	Interview for Brian Redmond

Jim, Brian Redmond would like for you to interview a gentleman named Bill Ward this Thursday (10/4).  Would you be willing to meet with Mr. Ward at 3:00?  Tom's on vacation that day, just in case you weren't aware.

Please let me know ...
Thanks,
Laura


Yes, but I would say that the $200,000/mo during the winter is related to an
HPL discount on Transport given to the marketing desk in order to make the
deal more economical.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Heidi Withers                           01/20/2000 10:28 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Entex Transport Reimbursement

Bass, is this accurate?

Ed asked me to find revenue from Entex for transportation expense to
Lufkin/Diboll for the residential part of the contract (Transaction 10).
After checking into it, we have all found the following things:

1. Howard allocates the Lufkin/Diboll meters (7107/8/9) based on actuals.
2. Howard receives allocations from Entex for the industrial volumes, and
then backs into the Transaction 10 (residential) volumes for Lufkin/Diboll.
3. Howard allocates the residential piece for Lufkin/Diboll to Transaction 10.
4. Kyle bills Entex for the residential volume, and applies the cash to the
sales invoice.
5. Cassandra cuts an invoice to Co. 16 to get reimbursed for the transport
expense going up to Lufkin/Diboll for the residential volume.
6. Eric tells Mick how much expense Tom is including in his P&L for this
transportation, and Mick includes it in Ed's P&L as revenue from the
Marketing   Desk.
7. Phillip does manual G/L entries to show an expense to Tom and a revenue to
Ed for the same amount .
8. This revenue shows up en masse with all of the other revenue from the
marketing desk in Ed's P&L.

The total revenue for Ed for this portion is about $6,000 per month.  Eric
says, too, that Ed shows revenue during the winter months for transport for
Entex of about $200,000 per month from the marketing desk.  This comes from
money reserved to manage the Entex deal.


done.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doner, Max
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:42 PM
To:	Hungerford, James
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Sitara price change for NOvember 2001

James,

Please change the price in Sitara for deal no. 876975 for November 2001 at POI 25306 to $3.2359.

Thanks,
Max


Chris,

A couple of years ago the East and the Central Desks decided that Empire
State Pipeline in NY would
be changed from an "East Desk pipeline" to a "Central Desk pipeline" in our
scheduling and accounting
systems.  The reason for that decision was to fix the significant OA
variances both desks were experiencing
by the Sithe book liquidations, and to better control and manage all the
subtle little issues under the gas
sales agreement.  Since the only transaction that was being done on Empire
was the Sithe deal, this
approach has worked great and the OA and contract problems have been
corrected.

Over the last month or so, Sithe pointed out to us that some days CNG North
Point gas prices were high
enough so that Chippawa gas could be shipped over to CNG Lysander and still
make a margin.  I talked
to Geoff Storey about it and told him to keep that trade in mind.  At the
time I assumed that Sithe's IT
contract would be used to ship the volumes from Chippawa to one of the new
interconnects with NFGS
at Pendleton or CNG at Lysander and that we would just schedule it on the
Central Desk and report the
transactions under our monthly revenue sharing transactions with Sithe.

If ENA begins shipping gas on Empire under our own agreement, there are a
couple things that I am very
concerned about:

 o   ENA has a contractual obligation to optimize Sithe's transportation
assets & to split
       the incremental revenues with Sithe,
 o   Empire desperately wants to Sithe's new 750 MW plant to be served
through Empire
       and if we start doing alot of IT business on Empire the word will
probably get back to Sithe,
 o   I hope that Empire Pipeline continues to be a "Central Desk pipeline" in
our systems.  We can
       not go back to that mess we had before when the Sithe deal was split
between two desks.

I will be back in the office on Tuesday, maybe we can get everybody together
an make sure that we can
come up with a plan that works for everybody.

Thanks,
Ruth


will probably check with you on Thursday -- I will be out on spring break camping with my son.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 4:54 PM
To:	Ephross, Joel
Subject:	RE: BofA complaint

check with me on Monday; I have a letter drafted to send to them

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ephross, Joel
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 11:43 AM
To:	'Klein, Stewart'
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: BofA complaint

FYI -- status.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Seyfried, Bryan
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 10:02 AM
To:	Ephross, Joel
Cc:	Murphy, Ted
Subject:	BofA complaint

I received the docs today...will go through them and send them over on monday.

thakns


Jeff, I wish you would have cleared this through me first due to the
implications in India. Keep me in the loop on all further announcements. JOe

Jeffrey Sherrick@ENRON
10/13/2000 03:26 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EGEP Sale Announcement

Ken, Jeff , Joe & Cliff,

This is a copy a note I sent to PR(Steve Kean & John Ambler), IR(Mark Koenig)
and Enron India(Sanjay Bhatnagar & Jimmy Mogal) regarding our internal
announcement to  EGEP/EOGIL employees in Houston and India on October 13,
2000.

On Friday (last night Houston time) we announced to employees Enron's
decision to sell Enron Oil & Gas India Ltd. (EOGIL), our subsidiary that owns
a 30% interest in the Panna, Mukta and Tapti concession areas.    We now have
bankers involved and a data room is being prepared in Houston which  made it
extremely difficult to keep the deal quiet any longer.  There were numerous
rumors circulating through the office, but the reality of the announcement
was still a shock to most of the employees in India and Houston. Basically we
said the following:
 1) Selling assets or companies is a routine part of Enron's strategy to
redeploy capital in the higher return opportunities.  The company has
exposure to a number of tremendous opportunities today that were not
envisioned even twelve months ago.  In line with this strategy, we are
placing EOGIL in the market.
 2) Depending on the success of finding an acceptable buyer for EOGIL,  we
will be reviewing the balance of our portfolio for transfer to other Enron
entities or for sale as separate packages.  We anticipate closing the EOGIL
transaction and rationalizing the remaining portfolio by March 31, 2001.
 3) Pending the success outlined in item #2, we will eliminate Enron Global
E&P as an Enron business unit on March 31, 2001.
 4) We announced some interim staff changes to facilitate the process.
  a) Jeff Sherrick would re-focus his time largely on the sale process
  b) Mike Stewart will be responsible for all India activity except the sale
process
  c) Steve Harper will be responsible for EGEP's sale activity and
coordination with our bankers and Corporate Development
 5) Commented on the potential impact to employees in general terms.  We told
them it was pre-mature to outline all of the possibilities until we signed a
PSA with a buyer.  However, in general, there is a good likelihood that many
people will either have opportunities for future employment with the buyers
or through redeployment within Enron.  Those people that do not remain with
the assets or are not redeployed in Enron will be involuntarily terminated
March 31, 2001 unless they are needed to close a transaction or to provide
transition services to a buyer.

I would like to keep this as low-keyed as possible.  Last year when we were
for sale there were not a lot of comments, but you never know.  If anyone in
the media picks up on this I would expect it to happen early next week.  Mike
Stewart is currently in India in the Mumbai office (01191228395841) and can
be reached at the Mariott after-hours(01191228577878).  He is fully briefed
on our position regarding the activities within EGEP and EOGIL.  Mike will be
traveling offshore and to Baroda over the weekend and on Monday.  I will be
available all weekend and next week at the following numbers; (work)
713-853-5934, (home) 281-320-2198, (cell) 713-569-4713.  I would suggest
talking with Mike or I before making any comments to the media if possible.

This afternoon I notified our partners and the Gov't of India of our
intention to market our assets.  I will be making a trip to India soon to
visit with the appropriate people in these organizations within the next two
weeks.  While I wouldn't expect this to happen, please refer any inquiries
from our partners (ONGC and Reliance) or the GOI to Mike or me.  As you might
expect, we want to be careful and consistent in our message to these
groups.

I will keep you informed regarding any changes to the above.  If you have any
questions, contact me at the above numbers.

jeff


Please disregard the "middle" message to Bill Cordes and note the below
request from Stan for your 2001 Goals & Objectives to be received in our
office by MONDAY, December 11.   I don't believe we've received a single one
yet., and Stan wanted me to remind everyone.

Thanks,
Cindy

---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000
04:01 PM ---------------------------

Cindy Stark
11/27/2000 12:18 PM
To: Bill Cordes/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc: Virginia O'Neill/NPNG/Enron@Enron
Subject: re: 2001 Goals & Objectives

Hello, Bill!    This was sent out during my absence, and I see that your name
was inadvertently omitted from the distribution.   Sorry about that!

Cindy

---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
12:16 PM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
11/20/2000 02:19 PM
Sent by: Cindy Stark
To: Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Gary P
Smith/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: re: 2001 Goals & Objectives

I would like to see a first draft of the 2001 Goals & Objectives by December
11, 2000.

I specifically would like to see goals dealing with the following:

1.) Resolution of the Navajo Right -of- way issue;
2.) Development of a specific business plan for NNG's South End;
3.) Timetable for TW's new expansion;
4.) Timetable for the completion of FGT's Phase IV, Phase V, and PhaseVI;
5.) Pipeline safety legislation;
6.) Divesting of Enron's clean fuels business;
7.) Business developments efforts;
8.) NNG's Equivalent Unit Risk Account  (how do we get our money back now !);
and,
9.) E-Commerce Strategy.

We will discuss further at up-coming staff meetings.


Matt and Denis:

I spoke with Matthew Flett about an hour ago and he advised that
EnronCredit.com Limited had finalized its ISDA.  I requested a copy burt he
has not yet sent it over.  Both ENE and ENA want to execute masters with MSCS
and we would like to work from your document.

Can you email me a copy?

Thanks.  Sara


I have been called by Simon Rosenberg at the NDN.  He said that things are
deteriorating for many of his members who want to take a balanced approach on
the crisis.  He said their internal polling have energy issues and their
impact on the environment on thee top of the priority list in the New Dem
districts.  Simon reported the surge in interest in energy is shocking.  He
said Lieberman may have come out early in support of price caps and
investigations...but others may follow.

Chuck Alston with the DLC called the same day to tell me that they are
hearing similar concerns from several New Democrats and Chuck said they may
be pushed into supporting cost-of-service-based rate making.  He and Will
Marshall REALLY do not want to do this. I told him that we would oppose this
and that we wanted to work with them to find other solutions.

Note that the NDN is hosting an energy event in late June where we will be
listed as co-host as an executive committee member.  I told Megan that making
it a fundraiser was not a good idea, instead make it a membership recruitment
event.

----- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 06/01/2001 09:56 AM -----

	Megan Hess <mhess@newdem.org>
	06/01/2001 09:23 AM

		 To:
		 cc:
		 Subject: NDN Energy industry event

NDN is planning an energy industry breakfast for June 21st at the AGA.  We
have several Members of Congress on board and are pushing to get at least
one Senator.  There has been some debate on how to do this event.  We're
wavering between couching it as a NDN members only event (hence making it a
fundraiser) or we can open it to all energy companies (hence making it a
prospecting event.)  I thought I would run this by you and get your thoughts
on it.  Any feedback you can give would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks!

Megan Hess
New Democrat Network
501 Capitol Ct., NE, #200
Washington, DC 20002
202.544.9200 x228
202.547.2929 fax
www.newdem.org
New address starting June 18th:
777 North Capitol Street, NE
Suite 410
Washington, DC  20002


I'll be there in spirit if not in person.  Cheers to all!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Leibman, Lara
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 5:52 AM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Dernehl, Ginger; McVicker, Maureen; Kean, Steven J.; Linnell, Elizabeth; Binns, Darran; O'connell, Earlene; Sullivan, Kathleen; Ibrahim, Amr; Petrochko, Mona L.; Gottfredson, Bryan; Dolezal, Regan; Enochs, Fred; Racicot, Paul; Garrett, Bryan; Phillips, George; Philipp, Meredith; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Palmer, Sarah; Clark, Mary; Votaw, Courtney; Schmidt, Ann M.; Richter, Brad; Piper, Greg; Woulfe, Greg; Frey, Gunnar; La, Nicole; Marshall, Lucy; Fallon, Jim; Edison, Susan; Sidler, Shirley; Zimmerman, Grant; Schneider, Richard; Barnes, Corbin; Harris, Michael; Santikos, Mark; Harkness, Cynthia; Hicks, Michelle; Rossi, Robbi; Gardner, Wayne; Gartner, Julie S.; Gresham, Wayne; Mcgowan, Kevin; Hochschild, Lenny; Wilhite, Jane; Clayton, Paul; Puchot, Paul; Koogler, David; Madaras, Tom; McDonald, Rob; Heintzelman, Pete; Arnold, Matthew; Arnold, John; Noble, Ted; Korioth, Ann; Tobor, Rachael; Kalmans, Elyse; Olson, Cindy; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Reck, Daniel; Metcalf, Kellie; Charvel, Ricardo; Brown, Jeff; Bolton, Stacey; Huson, Maggy; Perez, Carmen; Nord, Sue; Reyna, Margo; Barnes, Lynnette; Lawrence, Linda L.; Noske, Linda J.; Yeung, Charles; Burns, Stephen; Robertson, Linda; Hartsoe, Joe; Hardy Jr, John; Rizzo, Helen; Hawkins, Bernadette; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donna; Cooney, Carolyn; Sullivan, Lora; Long, Chris; Buerger, Rubena; Kingerski, Harry; Keene, Patrick; Ogenyi, Gloria; Frank, Robert; Neustaedter, Robert; Pharms, Melinda; Moore, Bill; Allen, Joe; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Montovano, Steve; Migden, Janine; Rishe, Frank; Ferlic, Suzanne; Reinfeld, David; Spector, Brian; Seeligson, Stewart; Woody, Rus; Manuel, Scott; Jachimiak, Matthew; Sheldon, Steven; Kaufman, Paul; Perlman, Beth; Wenz, Michelle; Lindberg, Susan; Roan, Michael; Nicolay, Christi L.; Warner, Geriann; Alamo, Joseph; Lawner, Leslie; Allegretti, Daniel; Boston, Roy; Hueter, Barbara A.; Stroup, Kerry; Jacobson, Lisa; Baxter, Ashley; Pollock, Adam; Pagan, Ozzie; Lewis, William Patrick; Bradley, Rob; Benson, Eric; Hemstock, Robert; Chapman, Tom; Hetrick, Nancy; Fromer, Howard; Floris, Vinio; Levy, Alberto; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Mangskau, David; Hamilton, Allison; Palmer, Germain; Robinson, Marchris; Stransky, Joan; Hartfield, Rita; Twiggs, Thane; Letzerich, Palmer; Watanabe, Luiz; Walton, Steve; Grimes, Michael; Grant, Fiona; Stephens, Sharonda; Perez, Gus; Sarkissian, Arshak; Suarez, John; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Burton, Katrina; Miles, Andrew; Arnell, Doug; Marvin, Michele Nezi; Wapner, Beth; Estrada, Roger; Masani, Zal; Hill, Jo Ann; Thome, Jennifer; Thome, Stephen; Costello, Zachary; Commons, Matthew; Hilgert, Chris; Lebeau, Paul; Walt, John; Warner, Traci; Lemmons Jr., Billy; Reichelderfer, Thomas; Magruder, Kathleen; Merola, Becky; Derecskey, Cindy; Williams, Robert C.; Parks-Foutch, Michelle; Edison, Andrew; Corman, Shelley; King Jr., Frazier; Baker, Marilyn N; Barbarawi, Moe; Betzer, Evan; Leff, Dan; Maurer, Luiz; Cross, Edith; Mainzer, Elliot; Martin, Amanda; Matamoros, Joseph; Mcconnell, Mike; Siegel, Misha; Schwartz, Laura; Taylor, Gary; Andraca, Marc; Snyder, Brad J.; Capestany, Mari; Wagner, Joseph; Lewis, James W.; Persson, Roger; Baukney, Scott; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Golden, Jeff; Brown, Michael (EES); Massey II, John; Woods, Trevor; Ferrara, Julie; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Coulter, Kayne; Dean, Clint; Pizzolato, Paul; Litton, Todd; McCaffrey, Deirdre; Konur, Sanjay; Wagner, Vincent; Gupta, Gautam; Mulholland, Sarah; Rigney, Brandon; Reagor, Rodney; Huertas, Alfredo; Canovas, Guillermo; Alvarez, Ray; Bestard, Jose; Comnes, Alan; Ingersoll, Richard; Hoatson, Tom; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Ryall, Jean; Haizmann, Jan; Wilson, Angela; Duffy, Matthew; Kimberly, Kelly; James, Terrie; Curran, Greg; Sharp, Vicki; Buchanan, Harold; Van Gelder, John; Van Chau, Michael; Felix, Bob; Franz, Kathy; Caplan, Ilan; Mansfield, Shelly; Vann, Suzanne
Cc: Guerrero, Janel; Leibman, Lara
Subject: Farewell Drinks

As our last day is Friday, November 30th, we would love to toast the good times and special memories that we have shared with you over the past five years.  Please join us at Teala's (W. Dallas) on Thursday, November 29th, beginning at 5pm.

Looking forward to being with you,

Lara and Janel

Lara Leibman
713.851.7770 (cellular)
713.528.5281 (home)
lleibman@houston.rr.com <mailto:lleibman@houston.rr.com>

Janel Guerrero
713.851.3778 (cellular)
713.524.1534 (home)
travelgirl_janel@hotmail.com <mailto:travelgirl_janel@hotmail.com>


There was a problem with this message previously.  I was not sure who received it previously therefore I have sent again.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:50 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.; Frazier, Lamar; Blachman, Jeremy; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.; ','
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

The Agreements between Enron Energy Services, Inc. and Green Power Partners I LLC, are for a term endinging December 31, 2002.  The Agreement between Fetzer Vineyards and Enron Energy Services, Inc. is for a term ending April 30, 2002.  The Agreement between Lost Arrow, Inc. (Patagonia) and Enron Energy Services, Inc. is for a term ending December 31, 2002.

Additionally,  Enron Energy Services, Inc. has entered into various agreement(s) with Enron Power Marketing, Inc. to sell additional "green tickets" from the Greeen Power Partners I LLC facilities in California:

EESI sells to EPMI, 1MW ATC, through December 31, 2001 (EPMI sells to EEMC)
EPMI sells to EEMC, 1MW ATC, through June 30, 2003
EESI sells to EPMI, 21 MW's, Sundays Off Peak, through December 31, 2002 (EPMI sells to LADWP)
EESI sells to EPMI, 14 MW's, Sundays ATC, through December 31, 2002 (EPMI sells to LADWP)

I do not know for sure how whether or not EPMI still plans to deliver to EEMC and/or LADWP, however if they plan to continue these sales and depending on our decision relative to Fetzer Vineyards and/or Lost Arrow, Inc. (Patagonia), we may want to keep the Green Power Partners I LLC Agreement alive.  I have discussed the EPMI deals with LADWP with Chris Foster, EPMI Portland Office and am currently awaiting an answer from Chris as to the current status with LADWP.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Richard Ring

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	Frazier, Lamar; Blachman, Jeremy; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.; Ring, Richard; ','
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

In this case there is a product element because at least the 2 retail contracts I named require us to serve green. If we assume them, we have to have green to serve.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frazier, Lamar
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:59 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.; Blachman, Jeremy; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.; Ring, Richard; ','
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

I thought the call on whether a contract is rejected was an economic call and not a product call.  If this is not the case then could we be forced to swallow the other discount off tariff contracts we  intend to reject?

Further, we need to know what the revenue is against this purchase to make a call on the economics.

Richard - Do you have the Patagonia Contract? And/or any of the other green power transactions that EES has entered into with customer's?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:50 PM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy; Frazier, Lamar; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.; Ring, Richard; ','
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

Sounds like the economic justification for rejection is clear.  However, we need to be sure that we are not going to keep any customers where we have a contractual requirement to serve green power (Fetzer; Patagonia).  If we are comfortable that we are not, I think we can reject.

MDS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blachman, Jeremy
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:47 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.; Frazier, Lamar; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

take a look at this. Unless there is a customer or regulatory reason to keep this, PPA, it would seem to me that we would want to reject this contract.

Thoughts/comments so we can proceed.

Jeremy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Neil, Murray P.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:16 AM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

FYI...  Hope this helps in your decision making. - MO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perry, Todd
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:10 PM
To:	O'Neil, Murray P.
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

Murry,

Our forward curves show SP-15 power at $26.57/MWh for the period 02/01/2002-12/31/2002 (note that this does not include the discount for unit-contingency that usually accompanies wind power).  Green tags trade in the market for about $1.50/MWh.  Under the "Green Tickets Sales Agreement" it appears that EES has agreed to pay $39/MWh minus the market price of power, which is approximately $12/MWh for Green Tickets using our forward curves.

Let me know if you need any additional information.

Todd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Neil, Murray P.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:15 PM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy; Smith, Mike D.; Perry, Todd; Richter, Jeff
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

Attached you will find two agreements EES has with ENRON Wind.

1- Green Ticket Purchase Sale Agreement (PPA)
2- Scheduling Coordinator Service Agreement

With EES & ENA bankruptcy and the fact that Enron Wind has not been paid for the generation back to the month of November through current, Enron Wind is attempting to move their needs to APX for SC Services.  I also think they were looking for someone else to purchase their energy.

I put a temporary stop on their actions but we are going to need to review these contracts to determine if we want to continue operating under them.

Please let me know your thoughts as soon as possible.

Thanks - MO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Weatherspoon, Patricia
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:47 PM
To:	O'Neil, Murray P.
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

aka Enron Wind.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Choate, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:39 PM
To:	Weatherspoon, Patricia
Subject:	Green Power Partners

 << File: Green Tkt Sales Agrmnt_Green_Pwr_Prtnrs.pdf >>  << File: Green Tkt Sched Agrmnt_Green_Pwr_Prtnrs.pdf >>

Chris Choate
Enron Networks
(713) 853-7370


I spoke to Steffes this afternoon.  I don't know what the FERC workload looks like.  He can answer that better than me.  We will need good representation at FERC during the next 12 months due to the California refund case at a minimum.  Steffes recommended keeping Alvarez.  I'm not sure that I need him 100 percent of the time.  But I am willing to go with Jim's recommendation.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:00 PM
To:	Belden, Tim
Subject:	Do you want to add Alvarez?

Shapiro says you want to add him


[IMAGE]

 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      Search  Amazon.com for:

 We hope you  enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future  e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit the Help page  Updating  Subscriptions and Communication Preferences  and click the Customer  Communication Preferences link.   Please note  that this e-mail was sent to the following address:  jsteffe@enron.com

[IMAGE]


The attached expense report is approved for payment.
Jeff Skilling
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron on 11/03/2000
11:48 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Katherine Brown                           11/03/2000 11:33 AM

To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Expense Report - Sherri Sera

Attached is an expense report for Sherri Sera that requires approval.  Please
review, approve and forward to "expense reports."


Steve:

Your angle is much better for the corporation, and a lot of the below might
be "mastering the obvious," but here it is.

- Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
 The petroleum, natural gas, and electricity price situations have a
different set of facts but a common demoninator--very tight infrastructure
relative to energy demand.  Here is a general set of conclusions with a few
"sound bites."

* The current energy price situation is "all about economics."  It is
economics 101--supply and demand.  Demand has been rising faster than supply
with a predictable response.  This is the bad news for consumers.  The good
news is that there is reason to believe that prices for oil and natural gas
are at the top of their commodity price cycle.  The NYMEX futures market
shows a "backwardation curve" for both--look in the daily Wall Street Journal
in Section C under "Futures Prices"  that usually is around page 14.  Look at
the settle price for the different energy commodities and the prices after
the prompt month (October) fall over the next months and years except for
this winter's natural gas price.

* Big oil did not suddenly get big or greedy with petroleum prices any more
than "big gas" has with natural gas.  Many of the same players were
profit-maximizing during the previous price slump.

* The constraint on energy markets is not the resource base but the
infrastructure to produce, refine, and transport supplies.  Infrastructure
constraints have had a cumulative effect of slowing the great engine of
market supply,    reflected siting issues and also low profitability (partly
the result of rapid implementation of new environmental requirements).

* The solution is to stop taking supply for granted and build more
flexibility and incentives in the system to profitably meet ever-rising
demand.  Energy investment must compete against many New Economy investment
opportunities that have potentially high rates of return.

Oil

This is a global market so declining U.S. production is a very small part of
the world supply, but the real constraint is domestic refining capacity.
Since 1990, operable U.S. refineries have declined from 205 to 159 when 50
refineries closed and only 4 new refineries entered the market.  [National
Petroleum Council, "U.S. Petroleum Refining," June 2000, p. 23.  Other
refineries have been able to expand to increase overall capacity, but
capacity utilization has risen rapidly in recent years and is above 95%--a
tight situation.  EPA permits to allow further expansion is a major issue to
making sure that domestic infrastructure keeps up with demand (p. 27).  A
number of proposed requirements to further improve the environmental quality
of gasoline has raised profitability questions as well (pp. 27-30).

The two actions the U.S. can take in the short run to increase crude supplies
are to lift the embargo on Iraq and withdraw oil from the Strategic Petroleum
Reserve (up to 3 mmbd).  Liquidating the reserve could be part of a
privatization program to get support from the free market community, and the
proceeds could be used to help low income energy users this winter.  The days
don't get much more "rainy" than now given that without price controls price
and not supply is in question in an "emergency."

A longer run approach must be to encourage domestic and international
drilling to make the supply response as elastic as possible to higher
prices.  Alaska activity such as drilling at the Arctic National Wildlife
Reserve (ANWR) would be a major contribution to world supplies.

On the gasoline side, much has been written about "boutique fuels" where
certain environmental requirements are required for certain regions that
makes the supply/demand balance very sensitive to interruptions (such as
refinery downtime or a pipeline closure).  The key to prevent price spikes
for consumers is to not let new environmental requirements outrace technology
or infrastructure constraints.  This discontinuity happened earlier this
summer in Chicago, for example, where gasoline prices rose well above $2 per
gallon.

Electricity

This is an infrastructure problem that could be alleviated by a more
efficient use of the transmission grid to get power to its highest valued
uses.  California in particular has followed a "soft" energy path where
conservation was substituted for permitting urgency for new power plants.
The digital age is driving demand growth although many traditional appliances
(such as refrigerators) are using less power.  General economic growth also
means many new appliances, traditional and new, are being produced and used,
adding to power demand.

Natural Gas

 Natural gas supplies (and infrastructure to some degree) must catch up to
high demand after many years of slumping gas prices and reduced incentive.
Over 200 Tcf of potential gas reserves is in areas that are off limits to
drilling--something that should be corrected given the advances in drilling
technology that make exploration and production much less invasive to surface
area than ever before.  Other public policy drivers should be a continued
emphasis on expedited certification for new pipelines and avoiding new short
run regulatory "fixes."  Past this winter, however, gas prices are expected
to decline, so consumers can lock in long term prices that are below current
prices.

Conclusion

Energy supply and infrastructure have been taken for granted for too long.
It was assumed that low prices would continue despite increasing
disincentives to increase supply and infrastructure to meet demand.  Demand
has also increased faster than thought due to economic prosperity and the
"wealth effect."  Market forces can correct the imbalance over time without
regulatory quick fixes and with reasonable incentives for industry
performance.

Robert L. Bradley Jr.
Director, Public Policy Analysis
Enron Corp.
P.O Box 1188, Room 4724a
[1400 Smith Street 77002]
Houston, Texas 77251-1188

(P) 713-853-3062
(F) 713-646-4702

Assistant: Joan Stransky 713-853-4702
jstrans@enron.com


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 11/22/00 03:24 PM -----

	"Chandler, Trina" <tchandler@velaw.com>
	11/21/00 10:11 AM

		 To: "St. Clair, Carol (Enron)" <carol.st.clair@enron.com>
		 cc: "Duckers, Sarah" <sduckers@velaw.com>
		 Subject: FW: Nanny recommendation

 Carol -- I came across this message from Sarah Duckers last night as
I was cleaning out my e-mails.  I don't know if you have found a nanny yet
or if Sarah's fill-in nanny is still available but I thought I would pass
this on just in case.  Hope all is well.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Duckers, Sarah
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:48 PM
> To: Garner, Kathryn (MDCK); 'Jane Shoppell'; 'Karen DuPont'; 'Laurie
> Holley, MD'; 'Lori Owen'; 'MOELLER, KATHRYN'; 'Terrie Sechrist'; All
> Female Attorneys - HOU
> Subject: Nanny recommendation
>
> I had a fill-in nanny this week for my little boy, while my nanny was
> attending to a family emergency.  This lady was very good, and is looking
> for full-time employment.  If you know of someone who is looking for a
> nanny for their child/children, give me a call for more information.
>
> Sarah Duckers.
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Please join us at an all-employee meeting at 10 a.m. Wednesday, Aug. 9, in
the Hyatt Regency's Imperial Ballroom. We will review our second quarter
financial and operating highlights and discuss in more detail the strategy
behind Enron Net Works.  The meeting will be streamed live on IP-TV to
employees in Houston, Omaha, Portland, New York, Calgary, London, Stockholm,
Frankfurt and Amsterdam.

As always, we welcome your questions.  You may send them to Mary Clark by
e-mail, fax (713-853-6790) or interoffice mail (EB4704C).  The deadline for
advance questions is Friday, Aug. 4.

We look forward to seeing you there.


I have one large sweater left from the ski trip last February,  first come
first served.


It's another big week for eSpeak, with two thought-provoking events.
Join us Wednesday, October 4 at 10:00 am Houston time for Harry Arora, vice
president of eCommerce.  Harry will be answering your questions about
DealBench.
Thursday, October 5 at 10:00 am Houston time, Beth Tilney, managing director
of marketing and communication, will be on hand to discuss Enron's new
employee satisfaction survey:  The Pulse.
We hope you'll be able to participate in both events, but if you can't, be
sure to pre-submit your questions on the eSpeak site.

Incubate your intelligence.  How?  First, recognize you have competitive
intelligence.  Second, go to the Edge and post competitive intelligence. It's
that easy.  We'll look for you on the Edge.

Stop by eMeet today and see the latest posting in the Office of the Chairman
category.  And, remember, this is a discussion forum.  Feel free to add your
thoughts to what the Office of the Chairman has to say.


can you come over when its convenient?


Attached is the Schedule we sent and Par. 13.
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 08:24 AM -----

	Susan Bailey
	11/13/2000 04:48 PM

		 To: jdeason@chbh.com, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Eugene Water & Electric Board ("EWEB")

All,

Attached is a redlined version of the draft form of (a) Schedule to the ISDA
Master Agreement, and (b) Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex.  The
attached tracks the changes between the 11/3/2000 draft presented by EWEB,
with that of the 11/10/2000, being presented here for review.

If you have any questions, you may call me at the number set for below or you
may contact Sara at (713) 853-5620.

Further, attached is a draft of the proposed resolution language for
derivative transactions, which EWEB's board must adopt.

Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Tracy,

Attached is the detail of the 4th quarter IBIT of (35.9) with a variance to the last 4Q IBIT presented to Stan of (26.6).  We will be sending the 3CE to you shortly.


My view is that we should go ahead and accept the ICE offer.  Please proceed with
the acceptance offer unless someone has a strong objection in which case let's
discuss on Tuesday.

John

From:	Justin Boyd/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 24/05/2001 09:57
To:	Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Brown/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Greg Piper/ENRON@enronXgate, Andy Zipper/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject:	Recommended Offer by ICE for IPE Holdings

This is to point out to you the approaching deadline for accepting ICE's Offer for IPE Holdings.  If we wish to accept this Offer, we must do so no later than 3 pm on Tuesday 29 May.

In the meantime, Michael has received calls from Richard Ward (IPE's CEO) inquiring as to our position, and it would be my view that we should accept the Offer. (Note that if ICE receives acceptances of 90% or more, then our shares in IPE Holdings will in any event be mandatorily acquired.  And assuming that such level of acceptances will be received, there is no reason for not accepting the Offer).

Please would you let me know whether you wish to accept the Offer.  Ideally, if we are to do so, I would plan to send the acceptance by close of business on Friday 25 May.

Thanks
Justin


I think it looks good.  a few suggestions though:

I haven't read the whole reprt so I can't say for sure that it alleges no
price gouging (make sure to forward this to Jeff ... my e-mail is slow on the
road).  We can say though, that instead of blaming generators and marketers
the report blames the structure of the market for California's woes.

I think we should shorten the quote to something like " the reprt is
consistent with what we have said all along.

We should say that the scheduling penalties part of the order will "penalize
utilities for underscheduling" not predicting.

Hedging is not about holding pirces down so much as it is about protecting
people from wild price swings ... that's what allowing utilities to buy
outside the spot should help do.

(Also, my title is just EVP and Chief of Staff)

	JMandelker@aol.com
	11/01/2000 03:32 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: approval of FERC article for eBiz

Thanks for talking to me about this article for this Friday's eBiz.

Please read it over and let me have comments tomorrow morning (Thursday). it
goes live 5 p.m. Thursday evening.

Sorry for AOL -- my Notes is wreaking havoc today.

(Jeff -- Steve confirmed that the report said power sellers did not exercise
market power or price gouging, so I put it in the article.)

Take care,
Jeannie

 - FERC Report.doc


Scott,

Further to John Lavorato's earlier e:mails and your reqeust for an analyst, the below analyst is assigned to your group as previously requested.  The resume will be forwarded to you and the A&A Program will contact your office shortly with regard to the new hire set up process.

Kind regards,

Karen
EWS-HR
x54667

Full-time Analysts	Allocated to	Lead	 Supervisor	Orientation Start Date	Business Unit Start Date
Savvas Leonidas	ENA	Scott Neal	Scott Neal	7/16/2001	TBC


Great

You too.

Doug
Doug-Gilbert Smith


POSREP HOEGH GALLEON, DATE:	27-May	6:00	4:00	(UTC)
A) Position at noon:	N	36 05	W	5   18.4
B) Dist. From last noon:	278	nm
C) Dist. To go to next port:	4885	nm
D) ETA next port:	LAKE CH.	08 06:00	LT
E) 1: Average sea/wind	Sea:	S 5	Wind:	S 5
    2: Average speed	15.44	kn	RPM:	78.23
    3: BOG 	137	m3
    5: F.O Consumed	16	m3
    6: G.O. Consumed	0	m3
    7: Average vapor press		Average liq. Temp:
Tk1:	0.140	bar	-158.12	?C
Tk2:	0.139	bar	-158.2	?C
Tk3:	0.138	bar	-158.33	?C
Tk4:	0.137	bar	-158.27	?C
Tk5:	0.143	bar	-158.22	?C

At present at anchor Algeciras, Spain

ROB at seavoyage interrupted 0600:

FO: 2977 mt
DO: 127  mt
FW: 168  mt

Brgds Knut Bentzr?d
Master LNG/C "Hoegh Galleon"

E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no.+873 330853910
Fax   : Inmarsat fax no.+873 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.+583 330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.+583 430853910 (24hrs.watch)


To all whom it may concern:

I would like to register my associate Zimin Lu as my guest
at Power 2000 conference in Houston in May. Thanks.

Vince Kaminski
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/17/2000
08:04 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
02/16/2000 12:58 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: power 2000

Vince:

I tried to register Zimin and they said that you would have to do it - since
you are the speaker and the spot is your free spot.

You can Email them the information.  They will need:

Name:   Zimin Lu
Title:   Director
Company:  Enron Corp.
Address:  1400 Smith Street EB1967
Phone:   713-853-6388
Conference Name: Power 2000 - Houston, TX -  May 9 & 10, 2000

Email the information to:  conf@risk.co.uk

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2000
12:54 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
02/15/2000 02:22 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: power 2000

Shirely,

Could you register me for the power 2000 conference in Houston as Vince's
guest ?
Since Vince is a speaker, I can attend for free.

Zimin

To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Power 2000

Zimin,

You are the 1st. Feel free to register as my guest.

Vince

Zimin Lu
02/14/2000 02:59 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Power 2000

Vince,

Could you take me as your guest for the Power 2000 conference if
no one has asked already ?

There are a few interesting topics I would like to hear.

Zimin


Please take careful note of the attached, regardless of this, I want all contracts get rid of any "put" obligations to incorporate new facilities !!

Lamar/Kevin, who is now on point commercially for the PacBell (SBC) contract ?

Jeff, I prusume yoo meant 9/20/01 in your 7th bullet point below, not 10/20/01 ?

Jeremy

From:	Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/16/2001 04:55 PM
To:	Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Andrew Wu/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Keeney/HOU/EES@EES, Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven J Kean/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Palmer/ENRON@enronXgate, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Commission Clarifies DA Suspension Decision--Requires Utilities to Accept DASRs for Facility Adds Under Contracts Signed Before 10.20.01

?	In response to the Commission's suspension of DA, numerous market participants--including Enron--filed "Petitions for Rehearing."
?	The California PUC has issued a decision denying the petitions.
?	Many of those participants are likely to file for appellate court review of the Commission's denial.
?	In its decision denying the Petitions, the Commission did however modify its initial decision in several respects.
?	Key among those is a modification regarding facility adds.
?	Those comments refer to the ability to continue to submit DASRs for new facilities under contracts signed prior to September 20th that provide for facility adds.
?	The Commission agreed and has ordered the utilities to accept DASRs for facility adds under contract terms executed prior to 10.20.01.  The precise language is cited below.
?	If you would like a copy of the decision, please contact Joseph Alamo.

Best,
Jeff

"We reaffirm that for the time being, and unless the Commission states otherwise in a subsequent decision, utilities are required to process DASRs relating to contracts or agreements that were executed on or before September 20th, 2001, including DASRs for service to new facilities or accounts if the underlying contract pursuant to which those DASRs are submitted allowed for the provision of that additional service.  Thus, for example, with respect to the specific ESP contract described by UC/CSU in their rehearing application, the utilities are required to accept, even after September 20, 2001, any DASRs they receive that legitimatley relate to that contract...[W]e want to make it clear that...utilities cannot set a deadline after which they could refuse to process DASRs relating to contracts executed on or before September 20, 2001."  pp 20-21


Sunni,  Attached is our form of construction agreement.  Exhibit C still
needs to be completed by us as we will be providing materials.  Exhibit D
needs to be completed by Mountain West.  I will Fedex the execution originals
tommorrow.  Let me know if you have any questions.  (713) 853-3512


Laurel:  I have left messages with Rhett Jackson (RMT vs. ENA) and Brad
Kirchhofer (why doesn't "Compagnie de Papiers Stadacona" show up on the
corporate database).

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Laurel Adams
	04/24/2001 02:43 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: changes needed for currency trade confirmation

Sara,

Have you had a chance to look into this?  Per Stuart, this company is owned
by Enron.  We bought it outright, with the intent of putting into an
off-balance sheet company.  I'm not sure if that part has happened yet, but
we theorize that when we entered into the hedge, it was still fully Enron
owned.  Bob Crane would really like to get this resolved, so if you could let
me know your thoughts, I'd appreciate it.  Do I need to check with Rhett
Jackson in tax as well?
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 02:31
PM ---------------------------

Laurel Adams
04/17/2001 05:22 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: changes needed for currency trade confirmation

Sara,

Are we able to do FX deals with the company shown below?  Also, would this be
an RMT confirm or an ENA confirm?
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 05:20
PM ---------------------------
From: Ana Rizvi on 04/17/2001 04:59 PM
To: Clara Carrington/HOU/ECT
cc: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: changes needed for currency trade confirmation

see below...

ana

---------------------- Forwarded by Ana Rizvi/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 03:14 PM
---------------------------
From: Bob Crane/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 04:51 PM
To: Ana Rizvi/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: changes needed for currency trade confirmation

Ana,

The information on the confirm executed (deal no. m439607) between EGM and
EIM needs a couple of changes.  Please make the counterparty:

 Compagnie de papiers Stadacona
 Bay Wellington Tower - BCE Place
 181 Bay Street, Suite 1540, P.O. Box 822
 Toronto, Ontario, Canada
 M5J 2T3

And the bank accounts should be

Account Name    Currency  Notes
2013883015	EIM Holdings, (Canada) Inc.	US$		Primary concentration & funding account
	Co# 1469			Receives US$ deposits from BoA collections
				US$ collection
				Funds FX settlement for Can$
				Funding source for BNS US$ accounts

2013883007	EIM Holdings, (Canada) Co.	Can $		Can$ deposit account
	Co# 1469			Deposit Acct for FX purchases of Can$
				Primary funding account for operations

Thank you

Bob Crane