I assume that Jeff D.  will give us his reactions but in the mean time here's
the proposal:

December 1, 2000

Honorable James Hoecker

Chairman

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

888 First Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20426

Dear Chairman Hoecker:

I told you on November 14 in San Diego that, by December 1, I would respond
to your plan with my suggestions to protect the interests of the people and
businesses of California by providing reliable electricity supplies at the
lowest reasonable cost. Obviously, a complete plan by the State of California
must await your review of my suggested changes to your proposed order, and
final action on that order on December 13. This letter outlines the first
steps toward a plan that my administration is developing based on extensive,
ongoing discussions with legislative leaders, consumers, business, utilities,
generators, environmentalists, labor, agricultural interests and other
California stakeholders.

This emerging plan will indicate to you that I am prepared to act with the
concurrence of the Legislature in California to fulfill our obligations to
assure reliable service at reasonable costs to the consumer.

The free market applied to electricity can work, but only if market
conditions allow for real competition, and if all parties act responsibly.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has found that the wholesale
market in California is dysfunctional and that the wholesale prices charged
by generators in your jurisdiction are unjust and unreasonable.

For that reason, I renew my call for the FERC to undertake the actions that
are critical -- and clearly within your jurisdiction -- to order retroactive
refunds to the consumers who have been harmed this year, and to establish
hard price and bid caps that will protect consumers until the energy
marketplace becomes truly competitive. I do not believe that your proposed
$150/MW clearing price limit will provide any real protection. I again ask
you to impose real price and bid caps in the $100/MW range on a transitional
basis over the next 36 months.

If you do your job of protecting consumers by rectifying the wholesale
markets, the steps I have to take can be transitional in nature and limited
in scope. I cannot in good conscience, however, forego any measure that would
serve to protect the people of California until I am satisfied that the
sellers in the wholesale markets will not victimize Californians again.

Since our meeting in San Diego, several things have occurred which influence
my current thinking.

On November 20, 2000 the California Energy Commission (CEC) published the
results of a detailed bottom-up study of available electricity supply for
2001. It shows that -- taking into account expected load growth, firm and
dynamically scheduled imports, and new supply already under construction or
under contract -- California should be able to avoid emergencies if supplies
are properly managed and scheduled. This presumes, of course, no gaming or
withholding by sellers in wholesale markets and an absence of panic buying.
But the CEC study also shows that supplies are sufficiently tight that market
power will exist and will need to be mitigated during periods of high demand.
The same opportunity for wholesale price gouging through the exercise of
market power and withholding that existed in summer 2000 will exist in 2001.
You must take decisive action to preclude such behavior.

During the week of November 13-19, while you and regulatory commissioners
from around the country were in San Diego, California was subjected to
several Stage 2 Alerts, reflecting severe shortages of generation, even
though these are the lowest load months of the year. Prices were
astronomical. More than 12,000 megawatts of generation were off-line at the
same time, including over 5,000 megawatts for "unscheduled outages." I will
recommend steps to assure that existing resources in California are available
to meet California,s local energy needs, and that information and the
authority necessary to prevent a recurrence of such events are available to
state and local officials.

On November 22 the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and
Electricity Oversight Board (EOB) filed comments with you that summarize the
current status of their ongoing investigations. They confirm the conclusions
of the independent market monitors that California has been victimized by the
exercise of market power by merchant generators and marketers during summer
and fall 2000. The state agencies have been hampered in their investigations
by the refusal of merchant generators to provide information that will both
assist in the understanding of last summer,s prices and in the fashioning of
remedies to assure that we are not victimized again. I urge you to compel the
necessary disclosure of information to complete these investigations.

On November 21 the CPUC issued an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the
proposal by PG&E to move its hydroelectric facilities out of the regulated
utility. The EIR concludes that such a project would cause significant
unmitigated harm to the environment and recommends retention as the preferred
alternative. This suggests that California,s course of generation divestiture
by utilities may be slowed or stopped.

With these events as background, I want to describe the steps I have taken
and plan to take to begin to address the energy problems in California.

Increase Supply and Expand Infrastructure

During the 10 years preceding my administration, virtually no power plants
were built in California.

Since April 1999, six power plants representing 4,700 MW of new generation
have been approved by the CEC. Five of these plants are under construction
and the sixth will begin construction no later than April 2001. Twenty more
applicants have completed pre-filing and have active applications under
review by the commission staff. Eleven more applications are in the
pre-filing stage.

This represents a significant change in policy and performance and responds
to the fact that we must increase supply as rapidly as possible without
abrogating our commitment to state and federal public health and
environmental protection.

Much has been made about the difficulty of siting and permitting generation
in California. With enactment of AB 970 and the creation of the Governor,s
Clean Energy Green Team this September, California has aggressively committed
itself to continue to accelerate the siting and permitting of generation and
to coordinate local, state and federal government agency review and action.

Federal and state air quality requirements present unique challenges to the
construction and operation of new power plants. Through the Green Team, we
are developing new and creative approaches to meet these challenges, working
with local air quality districts, the California Air Resources Board and the
United States Environmental Protection Agency. These might, for example,
expand upon the case of the proposed Otay Mesa power plant, where mobile
emissions credits are being used to offset stationary source emissions that
will be generated by the new facility. If necessary, I will seek legislation
to enable these new approaches.

I am also calling on the CPUC to aggressively reduce barriers and to
otherwise encourage the locating of distributed generation and co-generation
where it is viable, cost effective and environmentally sound. The CPUC has
already initiated action that will provide a forum for expediting
certificates for transmission facilities, including environmental review.

Finally, I believe it is important to assure that all supplies of electricity
are available when emergency conditions exist, to avoid interruptions such as
those experienced last summer and as recently as last week. Suggestions we
are considering for achieving this include new means of coordinating
power-plant maintenance and operations activities.

Forward Contracting by Utilities

Many parties, including the FERC, have recommended expanding the use of
forward contracting by the utilities including multi-year bi-lateral
contracts as a way of reducing exposure to volatile spot market prices. The
contracts, as a part of a larger utility energy portfolio, represent an
important tool to moderate price volatility and ensure reliability. I am
asking the CPUC to expeditiously develop benchmarks to assure the
reasonableness of these contracts without unfairly "second guessing" these
decisions in later years.

This process should be in place early in 2001 to provide adequate opportunity
for contracts to be negotiated and in place before Summer 2001.

Coupled with the forward contracting issue is the question of the obligation
of utilities to buy and sell all of their electricity through the California
Power Exchange (PX). This issue requires careful consideration since these
transactions through the PX are currently subject to full disclosure, and
safeguards are in place to assure delivery. These protections for consumers
and business must not be lost.

Among the suggestions that have been made to ensure that utilities have a
cost-effective portfolio of energy is the proposal that utilities retain
their existing generation, as was recommended in the CPUC's environmental
impact report regarding PG&E's hydroelectric facilities. There is growing
consensus around this matter.

I would hope that the paramount objective in this series of regulatory
decisions will be the protection of the interests of consumers.

Invigorating the Demand Side

Conservation and efficiency are the cornerstones of California,s energy
future.

Under my Executive Order, the State of California has achieved more than 180
MW of load reduction earlier this year during Stage 2 alerts, and is moving
quickly to add another 250 MW of demand reduction for summer 2001. The
federal government is following suit for federal facilities. The state and
federal governments should set an example for similar voluntary load
reduction initiatives in the private sector.

I was pleased to work with the California Grocers Association this summer to
develop a voluntary 10 percent demand reduction program during peak hours for
more than 2,000 groceries statewide. This program must be duplicated in other
areas where feasible and the business community in California has pledged to
work cooperatively toward that end.

I am calling on the CPUC to expedite its investigation of the state,s demand
reduction programs for commercial and industrial users, including the
interruptible programs. Those that are successful should be expanded. Those
that require change should be modified. And new opportunities should be
developed to reduce and shift loads during peak hours and short supply. These
programs must be in place no later than March 2001, to provide adequate
opportunity for private sector planning and participation.

I am also calling on the CPUC and CEC to coordinate efforts to demonstrate
and implement programs which provide real-time price signals and
energy-reduction systems to sophisticated commercial electricity users, and
to recommend a process for voluntary participation by consumers and small
businesses.

In September, I signed historic urgency legislation that provides $50 million
for demand reduction programs that can be implemented by Summer 2001. I also
signed legislation that provides approximately $500 million annually for the
next 10 years for energy efficiency, research and development and renewable
resource support. The CPUC and CEC are aggressively pursuing innovative
demand reduction programs using these funds.

Institutional Reform

As I testified at the FERC hearing on November 14, I agree that the
stakeholder boards of the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) and
California Power Exchange present inherent conflicts of interest for their
members and must be replaced. The composition of these boards is specified by
state law, both as to size and as to qualifications for directors.

I will propose legislation to replace the stakeholder boards with independent
boards that are accountable for their actions, and that will consider both
the need to assure reliability and the most economic method to do so.

I intend to move quickly on this aspect of the problem. Your concurrence in
this effort is extremely important. It will little serve the consumers,
utilities, merchant generators or other parties to become embroiled in
litigation over exactly what powers Congress conferred on the FERC in 1935,
or what traditional state powers, if any, Congress meant to circumscribe or
override.

Recognizing that there may be a need for more extensive reconstitution of
these entities, as some have suggested, I do not intend to let the status quo
continue while those debates are carried on. California will alter the
composition and membership of the boards so that the entities are in position
to contribute to achieving the paramount objectives of both state and federal
law -- protection of the consumers' interests.

In 1996 Governor Pete Wilson and his CPUC reposed a great deal of trust in
the FERC in moving California,s electricity system into an unbundled,
federalized mode. Now is the time for you to justify that trust. I want to
cooperate with you in transitioning to a market-based approach to provide
this essential service. However, first and foremost, I want you to do your
job and to let me do mine. Together we can protect the electricity consumers
of California and work to restore their confidence.

Sincerely,

GRAY DAVIS


I have not received any feedback from Edmund or David regarding the email
below.  Can you please respond as I am getting daily prompts for a response.
MUCH THANKS!

For Matt, your email stated that you trade over the IPE & NYMEX.  What rules,
besides the rules of those two exchanges, might apply to any on or off
exchange trades you might enter into.  For instance, here in the U.S. energy
commodity trades might be governed by the CFTC, where out equity options
might be governed by the SEC.  Besides the exchanges your email reflected,
what other governmental rules or regulations would govern trades you might
enter into?
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2000 04:44 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           03/23/2000 11:12 AM

To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Need Information for Audit

In connection with an internal audit regarding the safekeeping of margin
funds and securities, Enron Corp. has asked us to provide them with a list of
all the exchanges we trade on, what rules govern those exchanges and the
products we trade on them (in particular the clearing arrangements), and any
rules that govern brokers we may maintain funds or cash with.  This should
include all the products we may trade/hedge over an exchange including energy
commodities, interest rates, currencies, equities, etc.

Can you please provide this information no later than Friday of next week.
Much thanks!


Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net
----- Forwarded by Marie Heard/Enron Communications on 12/07/00 10:26 AM -----

	Anne_Heard@ryderscott.com
	12/07/00 09:00 AM

		 To: marie.heard@enron.com, rsheard2@juno.com, reheard_2000@yahoo.com
		 cc: (bcc: Marie Heard/Enron Communications)
		 Subject: FW: Just how hard is it to interpret voter intent?

-----Original Message-----
From: Richoux, Fred
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:29 AM
To: Heard, Anne
Subject: FW: Just how hard is it to interpret voter intent?

-----Original Message-----
From: Wagner, Bob
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:21 AM
To: Basanko, Olga; Connor, Larry; Richoux, Fred
Subject: FW: Just how hard is it to interpret voter intent?

Subject: FW: Just how hard is it to interpret voter intent?

This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individuals or
entities to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged and/or confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying of, or the taking of any
action in reliance upon the contents of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately at 713-651-9191. Thank you.


WOW that was very powerful.  thank you for sharing this with me.    it makes
me want to make a few changes to my life,

thank you
have a great weekend maybe we can go to dinner late nexr week


Chris,
I  propose we meet/talk with Kathryn before noon tomorrow. Will you be able to do  to that?
Shemin
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris  [mailto:Chris.Germany@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:54  PM
To: Proctor, Shemin V.
Subject: RE: appalachian  producers

-----Original Message-----
From: Bussell l, Kathryn
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Proctor,  Shemin; Germany, Chris
Subject: appalachian  producers
We (EES) have  been getting December production payments ready -- what are your thoughts on  actually paying the post-petition pieces?   Besides Dominion,  we have producers off of Gatherco, Columbia Natural Resources,   Columbia Gas Transmission, Peoples Natural Gas, and East Ohio  Gas.    Are these on your list to review some day like you  are doing Dominion?     A few producers have called  wanting to know when to expect payment and I just need to know whether to  forge ahead to get caught up in getting their payments in the system, or to  wait in case we have the producers taken out of our pools on all these  pipes/ldc's.   It is a ton of work, and if it doesn't need to  happen, all the better, but if it does need to happen, I need to be working  on it now.

Also, only one  company listed above could provide daily actuals so the others are just  being split by 31 days.    I figured if the producer disputed  his split (if paid), he could provide the back-up to make it more  accurate.

Any comments  will be helpful.  Thanks.

**********************************************************************
This  e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may  contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended  recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is  strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to  receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp.  at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the  message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an  offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and  enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the  intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as  the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I thrive on pressure.  My birthday is January 11th.  Is that close to her due
date?

Kay

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/09/2000 03:25 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Opportunities at ENA

Thanks.  Depending on your success as a headhunter for me, I will propose to
Kendall that if our expectant child is a girl then she should be named
Cynthia or Kay.


With regards to Section 9.9 Seller's Representative,

1.  Cutter pays Harley?
2.   As written E would not fix a price with Harley in a separate deal?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Commencing with an NHK (Japanese public TV) report and quickly spreading to
media inquiries and wire reports, earlier today a story spread through Japan
that the Enron affiliate E Power has immediate plans to build at least one
large (1000 MW) power plant.   In fact,  appears that E Power has been
pursuing this prospect on a smaller scly, but nothing has progressed to high
level management or board approval.

We are in the process of providing interviews and responding to inquiries
from major Japanese media and others.  These inquiries have been in
anticipation of the March 21 partial liberalization of the Japanese power
sector.  These discussions also are being utilized to confirm that Enron will
be opening a merchant office in Japan.  This is in addition to the EnCom/E
Power affiliate, which is focused on industrial power generation.  Attached
are the Q&As we are using in response to media inquiries.


Ms. Gonzalez,

For some strange reason I recieved your W2 in the mail yesterday.

I am located at 3148C  or call me at 3x7277 and I wil  arrange to get it to
you.

Peter Keavey


This document accompanies two e-mails I forwarded from Carla - the last EOL
Deal Summaries completed for the months of August, September, and October
2000. I hope these are what you're looking for.

Kate


Per our phone conversation this morning.....

I know you are well aware of these happenings (Southern Trails disappointing CPUC decision and the KMI Sonoran pipeline to California) but I thought these two articles were timely.

Since it sounds like the Southern Trails gas is getting stranded wouldn't it be great if we could give KMI some competion for the new Power Plant being proposed in the four corners area.  Southern Trails might be willing to offload some of the system cheap following the outcome of the CPUC decision.  You may or may not be aware, but TW was working with D. Hawkins at providing operating services of this Souther Trails system for Questar so we have pretty good info. on the Questar system (or Don does I would guess). Anyhow, I know the Southern Trails system has to be in close proximity to this proposed power plant.   (If I am driving you nuts with this junk mail Kim, please let me know.)

Southern Trails Disappointed by CPUC Decision; Decision Discourages
Development of New Natural Gas Pipeline Capacity

SALT LAKE CITY, Aug. 8 /PRNewswire/ -- Officials from Questar Southern Trails
Pipeline Co. today expressed disappointment with the California Public
Utility Commission's (CPUC) Aug. 2, 2001, ruling on Southern California Gas
Company's (SoCal Gas) Residual Load Service (RLS) tariff.

"The CPUC's proposed new peaking rate, while an improvement over SoCal's
current RLS tariff, still does not level the playing field," said D.N. Rose,
Southern Trails president and CEO.  "It punishes customers who want to take
partial service from a SoCal competitor, and it will discourage the
development of new pipelines inside California."

Under the CPUC's proposed new peaking rate, new gas-fired power plants
wanting natural gas service from both SoCal Gas and a new competing pipeline
will pay a higher rate for SoCal's service than captive customers taking
service entirely from SoCal.  In addition, new power plants would be subject
to more restrictive balancing services than captive customers and would pay
even more for interruptible service than California power plants in other
parts of the state.

Rose noted the previous RLS tariff was so punitive that not a single customer
has taken service from a competing pipeline since the RLS was enacted in
1995.  The new SoCal peaking rate, while not as onerous as the RLS tariff,
will likely preserve SoCal's monopoly in Southern California.  "The CPUC's
peaking rate is anti-competitive," Rose said.  "Neither PG&E (Pacific Gas &
Electric) nor any interstate pipeline enjoys such protection from
competition."

Questar is seeking entry into the California market with its Southern Trails
Pipeline project, which could deliver 120 million cubic feet of natural gas
daily to Southern California.  Questar purchased the former crude-oil
pipeline in November 1998.  The existing 16-inch-diameter pipeline runs about
700 miles from New Mexico, through Arizona, and into California, traveling
through San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles counties to Long
Beach.  The project received both federal and state certification last year
and has completed extensive environmental reviews.

The eastern zone of the Southern Trails Pipeline, which extends from the Four
Corners area to the California state line, is fully contracted.  Questar
expects to have it in service by mid-2002.

Rose indicated that the future of the California section of Southern Trails
is uncertain.  While not abandoning efforts to put the pipeline into natural
gas service, the company will be forced by the unfavorable CPUC decision to
consider alternative uses for the California portion, including possible
conversion to transport crude oil or other liquid petroleum products.

Questar Southern Trails is a subsidiary of Questar Corp. (NYSE: STR), a $2.5 billion diversified natural gas
company headquartered in Salt Lake City. Through subsidiaries, Questar
transports natural gas through a 2,000-mile system in Utah, Colorado, New
Mexico and Wyoming.  The company also serves as the primary natural gas
distributor in Utah, offering services similar to those offered by SoCal Gas
and PG&E in California.

Regent Energy Corporation and Millennium Energy Ventures Sign Power
Generation Accord for 500 MW Plant Estimated at $250 Million Capital Cost

HOUSTON, Aug. 9 /PRNewswire/ -- Regent Energy Corporation (OTC Bulletin
Board: RGEY) ("Regent") today executed a contract with Millennium Energy
Ventures ("MEVCO"), a private Houston-based venture capital and project
development company (www.mevco.com ), to develop an electric plant with 500
MW generating capacity (estimated cost $250 million) on Regent's Horseshoe
Gallup lease in San Juan County, New Mexico.  Ownership of the project is 75%
Regent and 25% MEVCO.

Under the agreement, MEVCO will manage the permitting estimated at 6 to 9
months, and construction process, arranging the equity as needed for same.
Regent will be prepared to give up 50% (total) of its 75% net for the
financing, netting a 25% interest following the equity/debt financing.

Further terms of the agreement provide that MEVCO will assist Regent in the
acquisition of several gas fields in the Four Corners area, San Juan and Rio
Ariba Counties of New Mexico, totaling an estimated 90+ Bcf and 20 MMcfpd
current production.  This production will be sufficient to power 100 MW of
the power plant, with the remaining supply to be aggregated from other San
Juan producers.

Phillip Gennarelli, Managing Director of MEVCO said, "We are pleased to be
involved in this project with Regent.  The addition of more producing
properties in the area that we bring Regent, coupled with Regent's Horseshoe
Gallup holdings, which are in direct proximity with the existing Four Corners
Power Plant and the route of the recently announced Sonoran Pipeline venture
of Calpine and Kinder Morgan, will provide an unequaled opportunity for both
companies."

John Ehrman, President of Regent commented, "The additional production from
producing properties which MEVCO is assisting Regent in purchasing, currently
producing some $1.5 million per month in net operating income, coupled with
the additional income through power generation helps Regent to maximize the
location of our holdings in relation to the proximity of the existing power
plant and transmission lines to key electricity markets in Los Angeles and
other western markets.  It is a good use of our surface lease, not related to
the current proved mineral reserves of the lease."

The producing oil and properties which MEVCO is assisting Regent in
purchasing are in Regent's core area of the Four Corners region near
Farmington, New Mexico.  Regent will be required to finance the acquisition
of the oil and gas proven producing properties under consideration.

Recently, Regent announced that it was in the process of purchasing the
interests of all remaining working interest owners in the field, a
transaction expected to be consummated by the end of the third quarter 2001,
giving Regent 100% ownership of the current minerals on the lease.

For more information call Phillip Gennarelli at (713) 409-6888 or Cheryl
Katzenstein at (281) 931-3800.


>
> >  GUEST OF HONOR:  Jesus Christ
> >
> >     DATE:   Every day.  Traditionally, December 25,
> >     but He's always  around, so the date is flexible.
> >
> >     TIME:  Whenever you're ready.  Please don't be
> >     too late though, or you'll miss out on all the fun.
> >
> >     PLACE:  In your heart.  He'll meet you
> >     there-you'll hear Him knock.
> >
> >     ATTIRE:  Come as you are.  Grubbies are okay
> >     as He'll be washing our clothes anyway.  He said
> >     something about new white robes and crowns for
> >     everyone who stays till the last.
> >
> >     TICKETS: Admission is free.  He's already paid for
> >     everyone.  He says you wouldn't have been able to
> >     afford it - it's cost Him everything He had!
> >
> >     REFRESHMENTS:  New wine, bread and a far-out
> >     drink He calls "living water."  This will be followed by
> >     a supper, that promises to be out of this world!!
> >
> >     GIFT SUGGESTIONS:  Your heart.  He's one of those
> >     people who already has everything else.  (He's very
> >     generous in return though - just wait until you see what
> >     He has for you !
> >
> >     ENTERTAINMENT:  Joy, Peace, Truth, Light, Life,
> >     Love, Real Happiness, Communion with God,
> >     Forgiveness, Miracles, Healing, Power, Eternity in
> >     Paradise.......and much more!  (All rated "G" so
> >     bring your family and friends)
> >
> >     RSVP:  Very Important!  He must know ahead,
> >     so He can reserve a spot for you at the table.
> >     Also, he's keeping a list of His friends for future
> >     reference. He calls it the "Lamb's Book of Life."
> >
> >     PARTY GIVEN BY:  His Kids.  That's us!  Hope To
> >     See You There!  Let us rejoice and be glad and
> >     give him glory!  For the wedding of the Lamb has come,
> >     and his bride has made herself ready.  Fine linen,
> >     bright and clean, was given her to wear.  (Fine linen
> >     stands for the righteous acts of the saints)
> >     Blessed are those who are invited to the
> >     wedding supper of the Lamb!
> >     --Revelation 19:7-9
> >
> >     ALL OF YOU WHO WILL BE THERE-PLEASE
> >     SHARE THIS INVITATION WITH SOMEONE ELSE.
> >


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
12/1/00  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
12/1/00  MANAGEMENT-GAS 1,152,305
12/1/00  MANAGEMENT-PWR 340,158
12/1/00  AGG-MANAGEMENT 1,376,639


-----Original Message-----
From: 	NW Security and Bug Patch Alert <Security-BugPatch@bdcimail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-NW+20Security+20and+20Bug+20Patch+20Alert+20+3CSecurity-BugPatch+40bdcimail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:50 AM
To:	vkamins@enron.com
Subject:	SECURITY AND BUG NEWS ALERT: Users offer tips on foiling Code Red

Users offer tips on foiling Code Red
07/31/01

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

_______________________________________________________________
Product & Solutions Directory
The "yellow-pages" for network products and solutions,
LinkSmart http://nww1.com/go/ad114.html lets you quickly
find what you need in network specific categories such as
"LAN Test Equipment", "Security", "Network Storage" and
more.

_______________________________________________________________
SECURITY AND BUG NEWS ALERT:
Users offer tips on foiling Code Red

By Jason Meserve

Code Red, the nasty virus that spread to some 250,000 host
machines a couple of weeks ago, could begin another assault
around 8 p.m. EST today, according to an alert from the FBI and
the Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) Coordination Center
(see http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0730codered.html). And
systems administrators are taking no chances.

For those that do find the virus, which affects Windows NT and
2000 servers running Microsoft Internet Information Server
(IIS), the easiest way to get rid of the problem is to reboot
the infected machine. Because Code Red resides only in memory,
it will be purged when the system shuts down. Once the system
is rebooted, users should install a patch from Microsoft that
fixes the vulnerability Code Red exploits. The proper patches
can be downloaded from:

Windows NT Version 4.0:
http://www.microsoft.com/Downloads/Release.asp?ReleaseID=30833

Windows 2000 Professional, Server and Advanced Server:
http://www.microsoft.com/Downloads/Release.asp?ReleaseID=30800

Directions for installing the patch and other information on
the virus is also available from Microsoft at:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/tech
net/security/bulletin/MS01-033.asp

Anyone running IIS should install the patch listed above.

Bud Nelson, a reader of Network World's Security and Bug Patch
Alert newsletter (http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/bug), says
he found the virus on one of his extranet servers and followed
the steps above to rid and protect his machine from future attack.
But he adds, "I am thinking about removing the network cable
tonight."

Greg Missman, owner of SecureTips.com, provides the following
tip to make sure the patch from Microsoft is properly
installed:

Look in your event log for an entry like this one (this is an
NT IIS5 Enhanced log):

2001-07-20 21:22:03 216.68.15.61 - 120.195.68.58 80 GET
/default.idaNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN%u9090%u6858%ucb
d3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%
u9090%u8190%u00c3%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53ff%u0078%u0000%u00=a 200
190

(Note: The line will be continuous in the log file.)

This means your IIS server logged a request for default.ida
with the underrun data. If you look right after the data ends
you will see a space and 2 sets of numbers.  "200" is the code
for "OK" and "190" is the size in bytes sent to the remote
host.

A "200" response on this request is very bad and means you
either have not applied the patch or applied it wrong. Reapply
it, then cut and paste the information from the log (everything
after GET) into your own browser pointing it to your own site.
You should get a "414" code after the request in your log
stating that it errored and your server blocked it.

All the hype about Code Red could turn out to be just that -
hype. But the steps for protection are relatively easy, and as
the saying goes, "Better safe than sorry."

_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


Dear Steven

Izhuta is a Global IT Services and Software Solutions organization with over 400 employees. I am writing to you to introduce our Cost-effective IT Solutions and Onsite/Offsite implementation services. With a deep understanding of our customer's line of business, Izhuta provides -- IT and Internet/Intranet solutions with knowledge specifc to your industry combined with a solid technological competence base. Our 120 plus client list includes Software product companies, Texas State Goverment Vendors, Telecom firms, Service providers,Oil Companies, National Energy companies,etc.

Our Cost Effective Onsite/Offsite Software development and implementation services include following technologies :

- Development Languages : ASP, C/C++, Java (J2EE), Delphi, .NET, XML
- Wireless media : WAP/WML, RIM, Palm, SMS, Telecom Applications
- Middleware/Application servers:  Weblogic, iPlanet, Websphere, ATG dynamo
- Databases: ORACLE, MICROSOFT SQL server, Sybase, open source databases
- Operating environments: SUN solaris, HP Unix, AIX , Linux, Windows NT
- ERP: SAP, PeopleSoft, ORACLE Applications structuring and other areas used in the development of software application packages and solutions.

Our Services are designed to offer high quality and cost effective software development resources to your industry. Our software development group has access to a large pool of IT staff with skills in the above areas and can even provide resources on a CONTRACT-TO-HIRE or PERMANENT HIRE basis. You can click this link to place a quick Job order http://www.Izhuta.com/home/PlaceJobOrder.asp

Izhuta can provide Enron Corp. with a total solution.  You can use our services on a Contract/Sub-contract basis for:

- Custom Application Development
- Intranet, Website Deployment & Internet Collaboration Solutions
- 24x7 Application Development and Maintenance Services
- Full application Re-engineering Services
- Application Migration and Porting Services
- IT Staff Augmentation on Contract/he or permanent hire (at 15% hiring fee on First year salary)
- Network and Systems Management
- Fully Staffed Dedicated Offsite Technology Centers as Joint Ventures (50% ownership each - 5 to 200 Offsite Development Staff -starting at $7500/month)

Please click http://www.Izhuta.com/home/Save75percent.asp  to build a Co-Sourced IT/technology team and start saving

Steven, we are very interested in meeting you for 15 minutes to discuss possible synergies between Enron Corp. and becoming one of your Primary Vendors.  Please let me know of the process to do this and a convenient time to do a conference call/meet with you.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
Hema Malini
Hema@Izhuta.com
Phone: 1 800 485 7004 ext 202
http://www.Izhuta.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/10/2001 12:09 PM -----

	Jennifer Rudolph@EES
	03/08/2001 03:31 PM

		 To: CA Team
		 cc:
		 Subject: NEWS: 6.5 cent bill passes Senate

* CA Senate passed SBX1 43 today
* Now, the bill goes to the Assembly
* Looking for article...
* More to come


-----Original Message-----
From: Donnelly, John L [HR] [mailto:john.l.donnelly@ssmb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:09 AM
To: Oxley, David
Subject: FW: Clean Retention Agreement

Gene Clark is our internal head of Employment Law, he is at 212 657 1098,
please let me know who you want to hook him up with.

-----Original Message-----
From: Clark, Eugene [GCO]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:23 PM
To: Donnelly, John L [HR]; Arber, Diane Z [HR]
Subject: FW: Clean Retention Agreement

Latest Version.

-----Original Message-----
From: LAPasini@wlrk.com [mailto:LAPasini@wlrk.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:58 PM
To: Clark, Eugene [GCO]
Cc: BGoldberger@wlrk.com
Subject: Clean Retention Agreement

****************************************************************************
*
Please be advised that this transmittal may be a confidential
attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or
confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy or re-transmit this communication.  If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us by e-mail (postmaster@wlrk.com) or
by telephone (call us collect at 212-403-4357) and delete this message and
any attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance.
****************************************************************************
*


<<fc_monitor_may01.pdf>>

Regards,

Marko Pencak
416-352-4580
Cameron Jeffreys (Associate)
416-352-4581

Energy Technology Research
CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON

 - fc_monitor_may01.pdf


[IMAGE]
 	 	    Dear eCenter,  The Washington bureau will continue following the very latest on any possible U.S. military action against last week's terrorist attacks.       The House Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality will hold a hearing on national electricity policy on Thursday.  All of the FERC commissioners are scheduled to testify at the hearing.  The Washington bureau is expecting to talk to Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) before the hearing.  The bureau hopes to get a preview of the hearing and hear what Chairman Barton expects for energy legislation out of Congress for the rest of this year.  Log on during the 10:00 a.m. ET newscast to catch Rep. Barton.   The newest member of the Texas Public Utility Commission is stopping by the Houston bureau on Thursday.  Commissioner Rebecca Klein will talk about the Texas PUC's declining role once deregulation takes effect next year.  The Houston bureau will speak with Klein during the 10:00 a.m. ET newscast.   Also from the Houston bureau on Thursday, Energy Consultant Dutch Holland, Ph.D. , will discuss how company politics can sometimes get in the way of productivity.  He'll also go into some of the mistakes companies make when they merge during the Noon ET newscast.   On Thursday, the CPUC is expected to consider approving a request from PG? to disperse $8.3 million from a trust fund to decommission Unit 3 at Humboldt Bay Nuclear Plant.  Also, California Public Utilities Commission met on Wednesday.  ENL's Kym McNicholas reports the commission is expected to decide whether to accept a draft decision that would transfer its ratemaking authority to the California Department of Water Resources.     On Thursday, Governor Gray Davis' Press Secretary Steve Maviglio is expected to comment on the potential for a bailout plan for Southern California Edison and the declining price of power.  The total state power costs were released Wednesday, with costs for August reaching $815 million, down $100 million from July.  We'll have all this from the West Coast bureau tomorrow.   Dain Rauscher Wessels Principal Mark Easterbrook met with Enron, Dynegy, Williams, Kinder Morgan and El Paso on Tuesday.  On Thursday, he'll join us with all the details from that meeting during the 4:00 p.m. ET newscast.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice.  Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of every hour.    Keep it on energynewslive.com  for all your energy news.
 			[IMAGE]
	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap  video: (Windows Media Player required) Broadband  (100k)   |  Dial-up  (56k)  Get  Windows Media Player   Experience all that Williams Energy  News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue,    subscribe now     To stop receiving this letter,   unsubscribe now     If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


sure

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/26/2001 10:37 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PIRA

They are coming in Sunday night obviously ( the 13th of May)
We may do a dinner around 8pm -- if this is a yes --are you in you? wanna
pick their brains with a one on one?

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759


Attached are the presentations from the Government Affairs-The Americas dept.
meeting which was held on Friday, December 8.  For those of you who missed
the special presentation for Rick, it is attached for your viewing pleasure
(see luggage).

gngr
713-853-7751


Attached please find the Bandwidth GTC (put together by Cynthia Harkness).
Please review it and approve for EOL. The launch date is set for the 1st of
May.

Please call me if you have any questions!

Thank you very much!

Regards,

Leonardo Pacheco


The report named: West NG Prices - Basis <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=45&report_name=West+NG+Prices+-+Basis&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/21/2001>, published as of 11/21/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 3)


Here's what I heard on the D.C. call today re:  the Senator Lieberman
hearings:

June 13--6 witnesses consisting of:  (1) 4 of the 6, pro-price cap
economists; and (2) 2 anti-price cap economists.
June 20--FERC Commissioners and Gov. Davis.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Comnes, Alan
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 1:33 PM
To: Alonso, Tom; Alvarez, Ray; Badeer, Robert; Belden, Tim; Calger,
Christopher F.; Dasovich, Jeff; Driscoll, Michael M.; Fischer, Mark; Foster,
Chris H.; Guzman, Mark; Heizenrader, Timothy; Kaufman, Paul; Mainzer, Elliot;
Mallory, Chris; Mara, Susan; Motley, Matt; Perrino, Dave; Platter, Phillip;
Richter, Jeff; Scholtes, Diana; Swain, Steve; Swerzbin, Mike; Williams III,
Bill; Wolfe, Greg
Cc: Steffes, James; Sharma, Ban; Briggs, Tom; Shelk, John
Subject: Additional FERC Actions Likely On MONDAY
Importance: High

FERC has set a meeting for Monday18 June 10 am PDT wherein it has noticed its
California and WSCC-wide dockets.  The meeting has been timed in advance of
congressional hearings (by Senator Joseph Lieberman) that were set for later
in the week.

Expect FERC to respond to intense political pressure to expand its current
price mitigation measures, possibly to a WSCC-wide scope or to all hours, or
both.

As far as I know Hebert is still President of the FERC, which would speak to
less intervention rather than more.

We will forward information as we learn it.

Alan Comnes

US FERC To Meet June 18 On Western US Electricity Prices

06/11/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has
scheduled a special meeting June 18 to address pending matters involving
electricity markets in California and neighboring Western states.

The commission's meeting notice provides no details, except to list for
discussion four cases involving price mitigation in, and the structure of,
volatile power markets in California and 10 other Western states.

The meeting comes as members of Congress are placing enormous political
pressure on the commission to take more drastic action to contain runaway
electricity prices in the region.

Last week, House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt, D-Mo., joined 21
Western-state congressional lawmakers to request an opportunity to appear
before the commission to argue their case for cost-based price controls in
the region's electricity markets.

"At least twice, FERC has determined that the Western electricity market is
'dysfunctional' and that prices are 'unjust and unreasonable' under the
Federal Power Act. Despite these findings, and contrary to the law, the
commission has failed to bring these rates to just and reasonable levels,"
the lawmakers said in a letter to FERC Chairman Curt Hebert.

By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires, 202-862-6647, bryan.lee@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=09/06/2001>, published as of 09/06/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


We sincerely regret to inform you of a tragedy that occurred earlier today.  Cliff Baxter passed away this morning.  Cliff gave many years of dedicated service to the company and his spirit and wit will be remembered.  Our thoughts and prayers go out to Cliff's wife, Carol, and his two children, J.C and Lauren.

We know many of you will want to do something for Cliff's family.  We will notify you as soon as possible about the Baxter's wishes.


Good morning everyone,

Timesheets are due once more, please let me know if you have any exceptions (vacation, sick...) for Oct. 15 -31 pay-period.  I would really appreciate your input by 3 pm, today.  If your time is regular,  simply reply with "no exceptions".

Thank you for your help,
Nyree I. Chanaba
713-345-4035
EIM Fundamental Analysis


Please give Marissa this info.  Thanks,  Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2001 06:25
AM ---------------------------

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 04/18/2001 07:20:59 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: FW: Missing Info in LLC Agreement

Kay:

Have you ascertained the dates on which (i) the certificate of formation for
Merchant Energy Ventures, LLC was filed and (ii) the LLC Agreement for such
entity was executed by ENA?

Please let me know as soon as you can, so that I can  pass this information
onto Jerry DeBerry.

Thanks,

Marisa

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received: by mail2.aracnet.com (mbox dquillen) (with Cubic Circle's cucipop
(v1.31 1998/05/13) Wed Mar  7 12:42:12 2001)
X-From_: list-errors.2000000260.0.2000191297.002@boing.topica.com  Wed Mar  7
00:19:33 2001
Return-Path: <list-errors.2000000260.0.2000191297.002@boing.topica.com>
Received: from outmta016.topica.com (outmta016.topica.com [206.132.75.233])
by mail2.aracnet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f278JNH31425 for
<dquillen@aracnet.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 00:19:25 -0800
To: Top5@topica.com
From: The Top 5 List <Top5List@topfive.com>
Subject: Top5 - 3/7/01 - Magic 8-Ball Answers
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:17:44 -0800
Message-ID: <0.2000000260.418361702-951758591-983953064@topica.com>
Reply-To: Top5List@topfive.com
X-Topica-Loop: 2000000260
Received: (qmail 24973 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2001 08:17:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 24963 invoked by uid 0); 7 Mar 2001 08:17:02 -0000
Received: from lsmls01.we.mediaone.net (24.130.1.20)  by inmta004.topica.com
with SMTP; 7 Mar 2001 08:17:02 -0000
Received: from custerdome (we-66-74-8-175.we.mediaone.net [66.74.8.175]) by
lsmls01.we.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f278H0j15868 for
<Top5-*****@topica.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 00:17:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Content-Length: 6486
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mailman.enron.com id
f291MGk16535

            To unsubscribe: Top5-unsubscribe@topica.com
==================================================================
         T  H  E     T  O  P     F  I  V  E     L  I  S  T
                  Now in chipotle salsa flavor!
==================================================================

     Today's Classic Top5:  Words That Sound Dirty But Aren't
         Read it on our website:  http://www.topfive.com
         To subscribe:  Top5Classic-subscribe@topica.com

                          March 7, 2001

             The Top 14 Answers from the Magic 8-Ball

14> Palm Beach County voter: "Can you make Al Gore the next
       president?"
    8-Ball: "Yes!  Mr. Buchanan will be the next president."

13> Al Gore: "Can I trust an 8-Ball to answer all my questions?"
    8-Ball: "Hell, yes -- you invented me!"

12> Guilt-ridden, Jewish son of the 8-Ball: "I'm going to play
       some Snooker with the fellahs, okay, Ma?"
    8-Ball: "Answer hazy -- I'm probably not having a stroke,
    though.  Enjoy yourself.  I'll be fine in the dark by myself."

11> Pete Rose: "Will I ever be admitted to the Baseball Hall of
       Fame?"
    8-Ball: "Don't bet on it.  BWA-HA-HA-HA!!"

10> Warren Christopher and James Baker: "Where will we be going
       next?"
    8-Ball: "Madame Tussaud's, for a touch-up."

 9> Chris White: "Will this list suck?"
    8-Ball: "Umm... is that a new shirt?  It looks great on you!"

 8> Adam Sandler: "Will I ever be taken seriously as an actor?"
    8-Ball: "Gimme a break.  Go play with your money, dumbass."

 7> Al Gore: "What is Florida orange juice made from and what
       should I do in 2004?"
    8-Ball: "Concentrate and try again."

 6> Santa Claus: "This year, will I get cookies or nookie?"
    8-Ball: "Have another Chips Ahoy, Tubby."

 5> Robert Downey, Jr.: "Does prison sex involve more cuddling
       than it did three months ago?"
    8-Ball: "My sources say, 'Bend over, pretty boy.'"

 4> Jack Nicholson: "Will Lara Flynn Boyle and I ever get back
       together?"
    8-Ball: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!"

 3> Kid Rock: "How many minutes of fame do I have left?"
    8-Ball: "Let me get you Vanilla Ice's phone number."

 2> Britney Spears: "Am I pregnant?"
    8-Ball: "Probably, you little slut."

  and Topfive.com's Number 1 Answer from the Magic 8-Ball...

 1> Dick Cheney: "Will my heart be strong enough to carry me
       through the next 4 years?"
    8-Ball: "My sources say... BOO!!!"

              [  The Top 5 List   www.topfive.com  ]
              [   Copyright 2001 by Chris White    ]

==================================================================

                      Rumination of the Day

            Sometimes I wish I was a woman, because I
            bet "The Woman With Testicles" could make
             a lot of money on the sideshow circuit.

                           (Fred Meyer)

  To subscribe to Ruminations:  Ruminations-subscribe@topica.com

==================================================================
Selected from 74 submissions from 28 contributors.
Today's Top 5 List authors are:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Kim Moser, New York, NY                 --  1, 14  (15th #1)
Rachel Blubaugh, Lewisville, TX         --  2
Jason Anderson, Birmingham, AL          --  3
Tristan Fabriani, Passaic, NJ           --  4, Banner Tag
Mark Schmidt, Paris, France             --  4
Matt Loiselle, Detroit, MI              --  5
Sam Evans, Charleston, SC               --  6  (Hall of Famer)
Perry Friedman, Monterey, CA            --  7
Joseph Moore, Concord, CA               --  7
Brad Osberg, Calgary, Canada            --  8
Bill Muse, Seattle, WA                  --  9  (Hall of Famer)
Glenn Marcus, Washington, DC            -- 10
David G. Scott, Kansas City, MO         -- 11
Michael Sheinbaum, King of Prussia, PA  -- 12
Kevin Freels, Burbank, CA               -- 13
Chad Mapes, Endicott, NY                -- Topic
Kevin Wickart, Normal, IL               -- Runner Up list name
Larry Hollister, Concord, CA            -- HM name (Hall of Famer)
Chris White, Irvine, CA                 -- List owner/editor
The Who, London, England                -- Ambience
 -> Ambience explanation: http://www.topfive.com/arcs/am030701.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------
             "Blackballed"    and    "Decidedly Lame"
         The Runners Up and Honorable Mention submissions
   The Runners Up and Honorable Mention submissions for today's
    list can be found on our website:  http://www.topfive.com
==================================================================
[       T  H  E     T  O  P     F  I  V  E     L  I  S  T        ]
[  TOP5 -- The Home of Original Humor    http://www.topfive.com  ]
[----------------------------------------------------------------]
The Top 5 List   (original lists)        top5-subscribe@topica.com
Top5 Classic     (greatest hits)  top5classic-subscribe@topica.com
Ruminations      (odd thoughts)   ruminations-subscribe@topica.com
The Daily Probe  (news satire)          probe-subscribe@topica.com
The Whack Report (real stories)         whack-subscribe@topica.com
The Kid Report   (kid stories)      kidreport-subscribe@topica.com
Gadget Geek      (cool stuff)      gadgetgeek-subscribe@topica.com
==================================================================
[      Copyright 2001 by Chris White   All rights reserved.      ]
[    Do not forward, publish, broadcast, or use in any manner    ]
[     without crediting "The Top 5 List at www.topfive.com"      ]
==================================================================
[    To unsubscribe: Send mail to Top5-unsubscribe@topica.com    ]
[            To bitch at the owner: chris@topfive.com            ]
[                     http://www.topfive.com                     ]
==================================================================

============================================================
Exclusive:
 Price Omaha Steaks Top Sirloins- Only $22!
Order today and we,ll add 6 Burgers FREE when you checkout.
100% guaranteed to thrill; order today! Expires 3/31/01.
http://click.topica.com/aaabtJclvXASclwLh7c/OmahaSteaks
============================================================

____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  -- Learn More. Surf Less.
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01


Apparently there was some miscommunication.  It was very clear to me after
our meeting in Louise's office that with respect to proposed Reference
Entities with which Enron has an existing business relationship you were
going to add the consent to the notice letter.  It was that consent that was
to dramatically speed up the process of determining which Reference Entities
could be listed.  As we discussed last week, without that consent each
proposed Reference Entity must be evaluated separately regarding whether or
not a confidentiality agreement is in place and whether or not the existing
business relationship is extensive enough to require consent.  Neither of
these evaluations will be easy or quick.  While Enron North America has been
reasonably good about compiling lists of confidentiality agreements, it is by
no means clear that all other Enron entities have done so.  We have not yet
determined a process for evaluating the extent of the existing business
relationships with our customers but that process will necessarily require
significant amounts of legal and commercial time at a high enough level to
make important judgment calls.

My impression was that you were willing to add the consents to the notice
letters since in one fell swoop it resolved a difficult legal issue and moved
your earliest possible launch date forward by weeks if not months but also on
the assumption that if a customer was not willing to give us their consent we
should not be taking the commercial risk that it was precisely those
customers whose relationships would be jeopardized by proceeding to use them
as a Reference Entity.

We will now move forward to develop the processes necessary to conduct the
evaluations mentioned above.  Please send the list of proposed Reference
Entities as soon as possible.

Bryan Seyfried
01/19/2000 06:35 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Consent

Just to clarify, we do not intend to ask for consent from every reference
credit, we do intend to send introductory letters to the relevant parties at
the initial set of reference credits which notifies them of our intentions
and why it is good for them.  My hope is that there are very few reference
credits that we need to get consent from and then we can make the commercial
decision of whether it is better to get consent or not quote on them.

As an initial step, I think we need to understand which reference credits
have confidentiality agreements in place and determine those names that we
have a potential fiduciary responsibility.  The latter obviously will not be
black and white but hopefully we can make some progress.  I would expect that
are really deep relationships are likely to be with either really small
counterparties or a very small subset of our large counterparties.

Hopefully I am restating what everyone already thought but if not apologies
for the miscommunication.

Call me if you want to discuss further.

bs


From: Don Evans, Chairman, Bush-Cheney Campaign

This is an urgent message to supporters of Governor George W. Bush and
Secretary Dick Cheney regarding the situation in Florida.

It is now clear we must raise money to fund the recount effort in Florida.
Governor Bush won the vote on Election Day, a victory confirmed by a
recount.  Now, the other side is seeking yet a third count by hand.  There is
a reason why ballots are counted by computer and not by hand.

The expense of the recount effort must be funded immediately.  Please send a
check in any amount that you can up to $5000 today.  These contributions, in
keeping with Governor Bush's "full disclosure" policy on financial
contributions, will be posted on the Bush-Cheney website.  Any funds not
spent will be returned on a pro rata basis.

Remember:
1.  Checks must be personal, not corporate.
2.  Checks should be payable to Bush-Cheney Recount Fund.
3.  Mail or overnight check to:

Donald L. Evans
301 Congress Avenue
2nd Floor/Bush-Cheney Recount Fund
Austin, Texas 78701

4.  These funds do not count against your annual personal federal giving
limit of $25,000.

Thank you for your friendship and support.  If you have friends that can
help, please forward this message to them immediately.  We thank you for all
that you did to help elect Governor Bush and Secretary Cheney.  We also thank
you in advance for your willingness to help us during this important time in
the life of our country.

----------(print and use form below)-----------

BUSH-CHENEY RECOUNT FUND REPLY FORM

ALL CONTRIBUTORS PLEASE COMPLETE

Corporate and foreign national contributions are not permitted under federal
law.  Only Personal funds are permitted.  Contributions to Bush-Cheney
Recount Fund are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes.

Full name

Spouse Name

Address

City

State

Zip

Home Phone

Office Phone

Fax Phone

E-Mail

Check Contributions

The contribution to Bush-Cheney Recount Fund drawn on check #___________ of
the account named as _______________________, represents our personal funds
and is not drawn on an account maintained by an incorporated entity.

_________________________________________
Signature of Original Contributor

_________________________________________
Signature of Spouse
(must be signed by both spouses)

* Please make check payable to:

Bush-Cheney Recount Fund

* Please mail or overnight express to:

Donald L. Evans
301 Congress Avenue, Suite 200
Austin, TX  78701

* Please do not send more than $5000 per person.

* In keeping with Governor Bush's policy of "full disclosure" of financial
contributions, your name will be posted as a contributor to Bush-Cheney
Recount Fund on the Bush-Cheney website.

* Any monies not expended for this purpose will be returned on a pro rata
basis.

-----------------------------------------------------------

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, simply click here:

http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a26493a56615396a0


Tana:  Can Jason gain access to the database for the purpose of
entering/reviewing comments?  Sara


?Register Today & Golf Free!

The LDC Forum d Winter of 2001
April 19-20, 2001 - Boston, Massachusetts

This year's Forum promises to be the best yet, with a special focus on:
Adequacy of Northeast Supply --- E-commerce --- Power Generation --- New
Project Updates

CLICK HERE!

Register for The LDC Forum or get more information!

www.interchange-energy.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The LDC Forum * Winter of 2001
April 19-20, 2001 Boston, Massachusetts

Contact Person: Jerry Ribnick, Interchange Energy Group 763-545-1515

If you prefer to not receive future e-mails regarding The LDC Forums, please
REPLY to this message with REMOVE in the subject field.

If you are unable to clearly read this message format, please REPLY to this
message with RESEND in the subject field.


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for TXN  follows from EquityAlert.com.     Texas Instruments Unveils Industry's Highest Performance Audio Volume Control IC for Professional Audio Systems   TUCSON, Ariz., Oct 19, 2001 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Designed for a wide variety of professional recording and playback applications, Texas Instruments (NYSE: TXN) (TI) introduced the industry's highest performance audio volume control IC (Integrated Circuit) from the company's Burr-Brown products division. Featuring 120dB dynamic range, 0.0004 percent distortion (THD+N), -126dB interchannel crosstalk, and +/-15V analog power supplies, the PGA2310 improves system performance in professional audio applications such as digital mixing consoles, multi-track recorders, broadcast studio equipment, high-end A/V receivers, effects processors, musical instruments, and high-end car audio systems. See http://www.ti.com/sc/aap6908u .   "Building on Burr-Brown's audio expertise and history of high-performance components, the new PGA2310 stands as the highest-performance audio volume control device on the market," said Mike Centorino, professional audio marketing manager at TI's Burr-Brown division.   The PGA2310 is a high-performance digitally-controlled analog audio volume control which offers independent control over two audio channels via a serial control interface. Other features include a wide gain and attenuation range of +31.5dB to -95.5dB with 0.5dB steps, zero crossing detection, and a mute function. The PGA2310 operates from +/-15V analog power supplies enabling the device to process large signals (input/output voltage range of 27Vp-p), thereby preserving the dynamic range available in the overall signal path.   Incorporating internal high-performance operational amplifiers, the PGA2310 yields low noise and distortion while providing the capability to drive large loads (600-ohm) directly without buffering. A three-wire serial control interface allows for connection to a variety of host controllers and also supports daisy chaining of multiple PGA2310 devices.   Available Today   The PGA2310 is available now in SOL-16 and DIP-16 packages. Suggested resale pricing starts at $6.95 in 1,000 piece quantities.   Texas Instruments Incorporated is the world leader in digital signal processing and analog technologies, the semiconductor engines of the Internet age. The company's businesses also include sensors and controls, and educational and productivity solutions. TI is headquartered in Dallas, Texas, and has manufacturing or sales operations in more than 25 countries.   Texas Instruments is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol TXN. More information is located on the World Wide Web at: http://www.ti.com   Please refer all reader inquiries to:      Texas Instruments Incorporated      Semiconductor Group, SC-01156      Literature Response Center      P.O. Box 954      Santa Clarita, CA  91380      1-800-477-8924, ext. 4500                     MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT -  Click Here                http://tbutton.prnewswire.com/prn/11690X72412042  SOURCE Texas Instruments Incorporated Semiconductor Group   CONTACT:          Texas Instruments Incorporated Semiconductor Group,                   +1-800-477-8924, ext. 4500 URL:              http://www.ti.com http://www.prnewswire.com  Copyright (C) 2001 PR Newswire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          Texas                   Arizona INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CPR                   CSE                   ENT                   MUS SUBJECT CODE:     PDT    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     Market  Statistics  Power Option PLUS Logo     [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/12/2000 12:27
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/12/2000 11:14 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ US Energy Secretary Warns Pwr Producers In West On Prices

18:59 GMT 12 December 2000 DJ US Energy Secretary Warns Pwr Producers In
West On Prices
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--As California's electricity system teeters on the
brink of collapse, U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson warned power
producers not to attempt to take advantage of the power-supply crisis.
"I am very concerned about the condition of power markets in the West.
Electricity supplies in parts of the region are tight and prices charged for
wholesale power in the region continue to spiral out of control," Richardson
said in a press release late Monday.
Richardson urged power providers not to attempt to take advantage of the
crisis by price gouging.
"While I have no specific knowledge of any such activities, it is important
that generators located throughout the region and in Canada and Mexico
understand that the administration won't tolerate any actions designed to
take advantage of the situation," Richardson said.
The energy secretary criticized a decision by Kaiser Aluminum Corp. (KLU) to
shut down an aluminum smelter in the Pacific Northwest that receives
low-cost power from the Bonneville Power Administration and resell that
power in open markets for a profit of $52 million.
"I have instructed Bonneville to explore all necessary actions to prevent
Kaiser from remarketing this power," Richardson said.

   -By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6647; bryan.lee@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires 12-12-00
1859GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


Scott Neal
Dick Jenkins
Jared Kaiser (scheduled to be out of town)
Craig Taylor
Robin Barbie
Tammy Depolis


FYI:

Alan is in Tokyo, Japan all week.

Thanks


Please remove me from this mailing list. thanks.
Greg Booth

-----Original Message-----
From:   doug_brawley@PNGC.COM [SMTP:doug_brawley@PNGC.COM]
Sent:   Tuesday, May 15, 2001 6:07 PM
To:     RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG
Subject:

Please deleate me from this list

Douglas R. Brawley
Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative
503.288.5555

"Dalia, Keith A - TOS-DITT1" <kadalia@BPA.GOV>
Sent by: RTO West Regional Representatives Group <RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG>
05/15/01 04:39 PM
Please respond to RTO West Regional Representatives Group

        To:     RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG
        cc:
        Subject:

You have been added to the RRGA-L mailing list (RTO West Congestion Model
Content Group) by Keith Dalia <kadalia@BPA.GOV>.

Please save this message for future  reference, especially if this is the
first time you subscribe to an  electronic mailing list. If you ever need
to  leave the  list,  you  will find  the  necessary instructions  below.
Perhaps  more importantly,  saving a  copy of  this message  (and of  all
future subscription notices  from other mailing lists) in  a special mail
folder will give you instant access to the list of mailing lists that you
are subscribed  to. This may  prove very useful the  next time you  go on
vacation and  need to leave  the lists temporarily so  as not to  fill up
your  mailbox while  you  are away!  You should  also  save the  "welcome
messages" from the  list owners that you will  occasionally receive after
subscribing to a new list.

To send  a message to  all the people  currently subscribed to  the list,
just send mail  to RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. This is  called "sending mail
to the  list", because  you send  mail to a  single address  and LISTSERV
makes  copies  for all  the  people  who  have subscribed.  This  address
(RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG)  is also  called the  "list address".  You must
never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed
to all the people  who have subscribed. All commands must  be sent to the
"LISTSERV  address",   LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.  It   is  very
important to understand  the difference between the  two, but fortunately
it is  not complicated. The  LISTSERV address is  like a FAX  number that
connects you  to a  machine, whereas  the list address  is like  a normal
voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the
FAX number  when you  wanted to talk  to someone on  the phone,  you will
quickly realize  that you used the  wrong number and call  again. No harm
will have been done. If on the  other hand you accidentally make your FAX
call  someone's  voice  line,  the  person receiving  the  call  will  be
inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The
fact that  most people  will eventually  connect the  FAX machine  to the
voice line to  allow the FAX to  go through and make the  calls stop does
not mean  that you  should continue  to send FAXes  to the  voice number.
People would just get mad at you.  It works pretty much the same way with
mailing  lists, with  the difference  that  you are  calling hundreds  or
thousands of people  at the same time, and consequently  you can expect a
lot of people to get upset if  you consistently send commands to the list
address.

You may leave the list at any  time by sending a "SIGNOFF RRGA-L" command
to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You can also tell LISTSERV how you
want it to confirm  the receipt of messages you send to  the list. If you
do not trust  the system, send a "SET RRGA-L  REPRO" command and LISTSERV
will send you a  copy of your own messages, so that you  can see that the
message was distributed and did not get damaged on the way. After a while
you  may find  that this  is getting  annoying, especially  if your  mail
program does not  tell you that the  message is from you  when it informs
you that new mail has arrived from  RRGA-L. If you send a "SET RRGA-L ACK
NOREPRO" command, LISTSERV will mail you a short acknowledgement instead,
which  will look  different in  your  mailbox directory.  With most  mail
programs you  will know immediately  that this is an  acknowledgement you
can read  later. Finally,  you can  turn off  acknowledgements completely
with "SET RRGA-L NOACK NOREPRO".

Following  instructions from  the list  owner, your  subscription options
have been set to "NOFILES REPRO" rather than the usual LISTSERV defaults.
For more  information about subscription  options, send a  "QUERY RRGA-L"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.

Contributions sent to this list are automatically archived. You can get a
list of the available archive files  by sending an "INDEX RRGA-L" command
to  LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You  can then  order these  files
with a "GET RRGA-L LOGxxxx"  command, or using LISTSERV's database search
facilities. Send an  "INFO DATABASE" command for more  information on the
latter.

This  list is  available  in digest  form.  If you  wish  to receive  the
digested version of the postings, just issue a SET RRGA-L DIGEST command.

Please note that  it is presently possible for other  people to determine
that  you are  signed up  to the  list through  the use  of the  "REVIEW"
command,  which  returns   the  e-mail  address  and  name   of  all  the
subscribers. If  you do not  want your name to  be visible, just  issue a
"SET RRGA-L CONCEAL" command.

More  information on  LISTSERV  commands  can be  found  in the  LISTSERV
reference  card, which  you can  retrieve  by sending  an "INFO  REFCARD"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.

 << File: ATT00003.htm >>


i am down in the crowd somewhere.
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------
To: Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, val.generes@ac.com, mmmarcantel@equiva.com, Eric
Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: DEATH VALLEY


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001 08:05 AM -----

	Peter E Weidler
	03/26/2001 08:16 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Job well done

Your DC team -  Hillings and then Briggs were instrumental in pressuring the
Bolivian Government to pass new transportation regulations.  It looks like
the regulations are 90 % ok - and better than the old ones. -  your team got
the right pressure points and applied them well.

Thanks

Pete


The new door code is...

Front & back door: 8025E

Women's bathroom door: 8025E 345E

Please help keep our office safe by not giving out the code to non-Enron San Francisco office employees.

Thank you,
April


Enron is willing to perform the operation under question (1) but not (2) and (3) as we have no control over these processes and only have control over process (1).
The System Controller can contact Enron Canada Power Corp at the number in your files.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richey, Cooper
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 8:30 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	FW: Supply Shortfall Procedures

in case you didn't get this

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ken.Gardner@powerpool.ab.ca@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:30 PM
To:	pat_cooper@transalta.com; mwindsor@enmax.com; mike.cooper@atcoelectric.com; kjdberg@epcor.ca; alr@city.red-deer.ab.ca; nigpim@city.medicine-hat.ab.ca; olenz@city.lethbridge.ab.ca; david.carmichael@atcopower.com; john.ell@atcopower.com; gord.mcphee@atcopower.com; alhoffort@epcor.ca; adele_birchill@transalta.com; bhan@epcor.ca; martin.merrit@engageenergy.com; wayne_occonnor@transcanada.com; Richey, Cooper; joeg@encoreenergy.com; wickhamc@novachem.com; pgschubert@dow.com; dmitchell@suncor.com; anderson.murray@syncrude.com; Marie_Gallant@PanCanadianEnergy.com; doug.heath@balancingpool.ca; lloyd_bures@transalta.com; dave_currie@transalta.com; royhanson@epcor.ca; chrisc@cnrl.com; denis.martin@airliquide.com; c.morgan@epcor.ca; brian_novak@transalta.com; joe.goebel@ualberta.ca
Cc:	Doug.Hincks@powerpool.ab.ca; jim_paton@transalta.com
Subject:	Supply Shortfall Procedures

As I have discussed with many of you, we are revising the Power Pool Supply
Shortfall Procedures (POP 801) in accordance with Transmission Operating
Policy OP-107.  POP 801 contains several steps from the time all the energy
in the energy market merit order has been dispatched up, to the time when a
firm load directive will be issued by the System Controller to curtail firm
load. In order to gather the information required to develop the procedure,
would you please answer the following questions.  Any action you choose to
take is on a voluntary and best effort basis, without any obligation on your
behalf.

In an effort to reduce the amount of, or possibility of having to issue, a
firm load directive to curtail load, would you please reply whether you will
comply with any of the following requests from the System Controller prior
to the issuing of a firm load directive to curtail load.  Please reply not
applicable (N/A) to the questions that do not apply to you.  If you will
comply to any of these requests, we will include the request(s) in the steps
identified in POP 801.  Also, if you will comply to any of these requests,
please indicate the appropriate party for the System Controller to contact.
If you choose not to comply with any of these requests please reply that you
will not.  This will let us know not to make a request for something that
will not be provided, which otherwise could cause confusion and waste
valuable time during the management of this type of an event.

1. Would you provide available generation energy that was not offered into
the energy market merit order if requested to do so by the System Controller
prior to a firm load directive to curtail load?

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

2. Would you reduce non-essential station service loads at your plant(s) if
requested to do so by the System Controller prior to a firm load directive
to curtail load?

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Name of Plant:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

3. Would you reduce non-essential drag line loads (if applicable) if
requested to do so by the System Controller prior to a firm load directive
to curtail load?

Location:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Location:				Response (Y/N):
If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

4. Would you provide a 3% (or another value) reduction in distribution
voltage if requested to do so by the System Controller prior to a firm load
directive to curtail load?

Name of Wire Service Provider:

If yes, please indicate who the System Controller is to contact:

Please email or fax your response to me by December 12.  If you have any
questions please contact me. Your reply (either way) is appreciated.

Thank you,
Ken Gardner
Pool Code Analyst
Power Pool of Alberta
Phone: (403) 233-6416
Fax: (403) 543-0388


Jeff: This is the first I have heard of this, any chance of finding the name
for this site???

Roger


Let's discuss when you're back in- not urgent.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 06/01/2001
10:22 AM ---------------------------

Larry Decker
05/25/2001 11:27 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Call memos regarding Sec. 201

The attached memo has been approved by Linda Robertson, Lisa Yoho, and Chris
Long.  Additionally, we have a call memo for Ken Lay, that we will forward on
early next week.

Chris Long will be in touch on Tuesday to help coordinate the recommended
calls.

Thanks,
Larry Decker
(202) 466-9163


That is by far the best line of the day!!  Unconscionability may be the thing
I'm remembering, but I think there is some more specific law related to
market dislocations--i.e., the Hurricane example.  Its sort of a twist on
market power law--i.e., if the fates hand you short term market power, you
better not use it.  DF

Susan Scott
11/21/2000 10:08 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: gouging

I know there is some case law out there on contracts being voided because
they are "unconscionable."  There are several examples in consumer law and
employment law, in which one contracting party is a corporation and the other
is a West Palm Beach voter.  However, if my memory serves me correctly, none
of them involve contracts between 2 sophisticated business entities such as
TW and Sempra or PG&E.  Absent evidence of fraud, courts uphold bargains
struck at arms length.
Kathy, I'd be happy to take the oars on this but if you've already done some
looking, please let me know if you've found anything.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           11/20/2000 04:44 PM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: gouging

Stuck on the phone so I thought I'd email you.  Stan has asked Mike Moran if
TW has any potential exposure on the high value transport deals under "anti
gouging" statutes or common law.  You know, the laws that say you can't
charge $100 per sheet of plywood during a hurricane or $50 for a bucket of
water during a drought.  I think we need to research two things:
1.  are there any such laws applicable to our business?  (Cal. state law
would probably be the best place to start)
2.  could the political/regulatory fight in Cal about power and gas prices
ever expand all the way to our transport pricing?  I.e., if the CPUC whacks
the power sellers for taking unfair advantage of their monopoly power, its
not a big leap for the CPUC or FERC or even U.S. congress to whack gas
sellers for jacking prices up to $14/MMBtu, as happened on Friday.  If that
happens, its just another small jump to whack us for charging $1 for
transport, or so the logic goes.  I'd like to hear preliminary views by 8:30
Monday am so I can talk to Mike before Stan's staff meeting (no written memo
necessary).  Based on that prelim. research, we can decide what else need s
to be done.  Thanks df


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 01/01/2001 09:42 PM
---------------------------

"Conrad Neal" <cneal@bluegate.com> on 12/29/2000 09:46:19 AM
Please respond to <cneal@bluegate.com>
To: "'Neal, Scott'" <sneal@enron.com>, "'Neal, Todd'" <todd.neal@chron.com>,
"'Neal, John'" <muddywaters@hubserv.com>
cc:
Subject: Willis Tree Farm Taxes

I paid the Farm taxes today leaving a small balance in the account. Please
call me today and I will give you the Wells Fargo account number for you to
make your deposits direct. Thanks.

Dad

 - winmail.dat


TCPL has replied to the NEB they and the signatories wish to proceed with their application unamended.  Now for the board to establish a process.  The earliest this could be in place would be August 1 but realistically it could be much later than that.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heal, Kevin
Sent:	Monday, June 11, 2001 12:55 PM
To:	Hemstock, Robert; Tiberi, Fino; Mckay, Jonathan; Le dain, Eric; Concannon, Ruth; Pearson, Jeff; Hedstrom, Peggy; Milnthorp, Rob; Storey, Geoff
Subject:	TCPL Toll Application

The NEB has advised that because of the substantial opposition to the Settlement, it can not treat it as a "Negotiated Settlement".  This means the board will not be obligated to approve or deny the application as a whole and could cherry pick what components get approved.  The board has asked TCPL to confirm whether to they wish to proceed with the application or file something new before the board establishes a process to consider the tolls.  Interesting to see if any of the signatories walk away from the deal in light of this.
Kevin


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 01:51 PM ---------------------------

Ray Alvarez@ENRON
04/25/2001 11:48 AM
To:	Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: This morning's Commission meeting delayed

Phil,  I suspect that discussions/negotiations are taking place behind closed doors "in smoke filled rooms", if not directly between Commissioners then among FERC staffers.  Never say never, but I think it is highly unlikely that the final order will contain a fixed price cap.  I base this belief in large part on what I heard at a luncheon I attended yesterday afternoon at which the keynote speaker was FERC Chairman Curt Hebert.  Although the Chairman began his presentation by expressly stating that he would not comment or answer questions on pending proceedings before the Commission, Hebert had some enlightening comments which relate to price caps:

Price caps are almost never the right answer
Price Caps will have the effect of prolonging shortages
Competitive choices for consumers is the right answer
Any solution, however short term, that does not increase supply or reduce demand, is not acceptable
Eight out of eleven western Governors oppose price caps, in that they would export California's problems to the West

This is the latest intelligence I have on the matter, and it's a pretty strong anti- price cap position.  Of course, Hebert is just one Commissioner out of 3 currently on the Commission, but he controls the meeting agenda and if the draft order is not to his liking, the item could be bumped off the agenda.  Hope this info helps.  Ray

Phillip K Allen@ECT
04/25/2001 02:28 PM
To:	Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Re: This morning's Commission meeting delayed

Are there behind closed doors discussions being held prior to the meeting?  Is there the potential for a surprise announcement of some sort of fixed price gas or power cap once the open meeting finally happens?

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


2 missing deals for mike

sell dynegy
cal 04
59.00
25 mw
sp15
off peak

sell dynegy
cal 04
45.00
25 mw
sp15
off peak


Chris,
As part of independence issues, the requesting group / VP should be EES (i.e. not Enron Assurance).  Who would be appropriate?

kl
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gresch, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:16 PM
To:	Lewchuk, Ken
Subject:	Re: CSC Work Request

Ken, we need to identify who the VP over the requesting group is in the request.  Would this be Evan?

From:	Ken Lewchuk/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/03/2001 02:11 PM
To:	Robert D Gresch/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:	CSC Work Request

FYI, here is a copy of the work request I have forwarded to Jacqueline.

Regards


You're right - I've changed this deal in Enpower.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/09/2001 02:05 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource checkout

492699
i think the price on this deal should be 225.05?


That's the way it should be and that's what we're doing!  The technology
groups from Enron Net Works, Enron Transportation Services, Enron Broadband
Services and Enron Energy Services are joining together to bring you the
latest Enron Technology Showcase.  The purpose of this event is to keep you,
our customer, aware of the tools available to you today as well as plans for
the future.  Come see and hear about the future of( laptops, desktops,
operating systems, messaging and much more.

When:  November 2 & 3
Time:  10:00 a.m. ) 2:00 p.m.
Place: Enron Building Plaza

Thursday, November 2, 2000
? Windows 2000 * ) See the latest workstation operating system coming to a
desktop near you.
? Help Desk * ) Let,s talk it over.  Come meet your front line support group.
? IT Procurement * ) Everyone loves to shop, but do you know what you,re
buying?  We do.
? Security * ) We,ll answer your questions about gaining access to
applications and other network resources.
? Hardware * ) See the latest laptops, desktops, etc.
? Integrated Solutions Center ) Do you have questions about eHRonline?  We
have the answers!
? Technology Training ) If you,re not learning, you,re not growing.  Stop by
and see what classes are available to you.

Friday, November 3, 2000
? Messaging * ) E-Mail, E-Mail, E-Mail( See and hear about the future
solution for your Business Unit.
? Remote Connectivity * ) Do you work from home or are you a &road warrior8?
This exhibit can help you get connected.
? Global Strategic Sourcing ) We,ve got plans to &Save You Money8.  Stop by
and see how.
? Enron Broadband Services ** ) EBS specific offering.
? Enron Energy Services ** ) EES specific offering.
? Enron Transportation Services ** ) ETS specific offering.
? Enron Net Works ** ) ENW specific offering.

*   Representatives from all of the IT Business Units (ENW, ETS, EBS and EES)
will be present to answer your questions.

** Each IT Business Unit has an exhibit to &Strut their stuff8!  They will be
showcasing products and services that are specific to their
    customer base.  You,ll have to see it to believe it!

As you can see, we have 2 full days of information to share with you.  So,
mark your calendar and don,t forget to stop by and see your Information
Technology Team in action.  We look forward to seeing you there.

Susan Lopez
Director, Customer Connection
Enron Net Works
713-853-7947


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/13/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,797
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,280
Total Life to Date Transactions	431,065

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/13/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,273	75%
Enron Europe Limited	172	33%
Global Products	106	28%
Enron Metals	246	9%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	48%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,594,004,524
MTD	24,577,158,140
LTD	238,008,842,818
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,247,564,889

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	16,442,818,994

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	558
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,223
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,732
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,714


You forgot to have me off the week of Thanksgiving too.  I know I mentioned
that to you...


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company - Notice Text
DECEMBER 10, 2000         12:45 PM CCT

TO: ALL TENNESSEE CUSTOMERS

RE: D/S MLV 314 SEAL LIFTED FOR 21:00  12/10/00

Due to reduced nominations, Tennessee Gas Pipeline is lifting the seal
D/S of MLV 314 effective 21:00 Cycle 2 December 10, 2000.

Please contact your Customer Service Representative or Volume Analyst
if you have any questions.

Craig Harris
Manager, Operations Control

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************


the nymex number is 1-800-438-8616

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jordan, Paul
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:55 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	RE: Nymex

I meant in general, is there anyone you coordinate with if you have any questions on Nymex.

paul

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Jordan, Paul
Subject:	RE: Nymex

i have never spoke with the nymex in regards to this , it was a cqg or a telerate formula or function depending on the feed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jordan, Paul
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	Nymex

Dutch,

Who from Nymex do you speak with when you have any problems with their services? Please reply at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Paul Jordan
Enron Net Works
Market Data Analyst
Paul.Jordan@enron.com
(713) 853-0320