Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/01/2001 05:27 PM -----

	"Chris Micheli" <cmicheli@carpentersnodgrass.com>
	04/30/2001 06:19 PM

		 To: "Susan McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Sue Mara"
<smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Scott Sadler"
<sadlersa@earthlink.net>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Sandi
McCubbin" <smccubbi@enron.com>, "Ron Tom" <rtom@govadv.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Rina Venturini"
<rventurini@teamgsi.net>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Rachel
King" <rachel.king@elpaso.com>, "Phil Isenberg" <isenberg@hmot.com>, "Paula
Soos" <paula_soos@covantaenergy.com>, "Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>,
"Maureen O'Haren" <oharen@hmot.com>, "Marie Moretti"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Kent
Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Julee Ball" <jmball@ns.net>, "John
Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "John Larrea"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jeff Dasovich"
<jeff.dasovich@enron.com>, "Jean Munoz" <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "Jan
Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hedy
Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Fred Pownall"
<fred_pownall@ka-pow.com>, "Delaney Hunter" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>, "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Anne Kelly"
<kelly@hnks.com>, "Andy Brown" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "John Norwood"
<janorwood@norped.com>, "Pete Conaty" <pcaceo@pacbell.net>, "Matt Kilroy"
<matt.kilroy@pge-corp.com>, "Cary Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Carolyn
McIntyre" <cmcintyre@sempra.com>, "Barbara LeVake" <blevake@syix.com>, "Pat
Pape" <ppape@calpine.com>, "Mohammed Alrai" <mohammeda@calpine.com>, "Kent
Robertson" <kentr@calpine.com>, "Katherine Potter" <katherip@calpine.com>,
"Juan Rodriguez" <juanr@calpine.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"Bill Highlander" <highlander@calpine.com>, "Aymee Ramos" <aymeer@calpine.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: SB 1x hearing today

As you may know, SB 1x (Soto/Scott) passed the Senate Appropriations
Committee by an initial vote of 7-3 (the bare minimum).
Senator Soto said that the Legislature must make a "bold proposition" with
this bill.  She said that this experience is "like no consumer has been
gouged before."  The Legislature must cap rates.  This bill guarantees a
generous profit to generators.
Senator Scott said that these generator profits have been gained off of
consumers.  According to FERC, over $500 million in excess profits have been
reaped.  Californians have been "royally mistreated" by generators.  This
"money has left the state (to Texas and other places)."  This bill is the
only solution.  The PUC can change the $80 rate.  Based upon the January
Field Poll, Californians support this concept.  We have to "stand up to the
generators and say no more."
Supporters were:  TURN and CTRA (Lenny Goldberg).  Lenny said that the FERC
will not give any relief to CA ratepayers, so the Legislature has to.  This
bill needs to be combined with the power authority by Senator Burton to hold
prices down.
Other supporters of the bill included:  Congress of CA Seniors; CalPIRG; CA
Consumer Federation; CA Labor Federation; SEIU; Public Power Now.  SEIU
(public employee union) said that this bill is "the only way to put caps on
rates."
Opponents were CMTA ("this is the wrong medicine for solving the problem");
WSPA (does nothing to resolve the shortage of energy; we should be doing
bills to stimulate greater investment in supply); Intergen said that they are
looking at California market, but will not build with this bill out there.
CA Wind Energy Assn (QFs oppose this bill because the rate is too low); and
IEP (most productive answer to our problem is the build power plants).
Senator Battin said that the price cap is lower than some of the Governor's
long-term contracts at $86 per hour.  Senator Scott said that the munis are,
indeed, covered by the bill.  He also said that the PUC can change the rates
contained in this bill.  Scott also said that the PUC can exempt renewables
under the bill.
Senator Bowen stated that the $80 figure should be removed from the bill
("this price may be inappropriate").  She suggested using the "FERC proxy
price."  She suggested that they look at an exemption for contracts with the
state.  She saw no reason to exempt the renewables because they would make a
bundle with an $80 cap.
Senator Poochigian said he was concerned about the majority vote issue
(because this bill is allegedly revenue neutral).  Scott said all of the
money raised by the bill will go to ratepayers.  He said that Legislative
Counsel gave him an opinion (I don't know if it is written or verbal) that
this scheme was permitted.  Poochigian said it was ironic that the PUC was
being given the authority to set rates under this bill.
Senator Scott stated that they would take as an author's amendment to exclude
all long-term contracts from the provisions of this bill.
Next stop for the bill is the Senate Floor.

Chris Micheli, Esq.
Carpenter Snodgrass & Associates
1201 K Street, Suite 710
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 447-2251
FAX: (916) 445-5624
EMAIL: cmicheli@carpentersnodgrass.com


awfully close......


John,

Doug called me with a question regarding the Historical Henry Hub price: Are
those monthly gas prices as of NYMEX contract expiration date?  For example,
Jan. 2001 contracts expire on 12/31/2000.  He wants to make sure that the
12/31/2000 gas price is actually for Jan. 2001 contracts.  Thanks!

Ying

John Griffith
01/31/2001 04:43 PM
To: Ying Liu/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Indeck Corinth Curve Update

Here is the hub prices.  Eric Boyt will be sending you the curves.  Call with
questions.  Thanks.

John


Everything looks great except for May 28th.  We had 2 hours of 25MW of txm.  It is supported under Tag #530 for your info.

Thanks

Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: John Paulsen [mailto:Paulsen@wapa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:15 PM
To: Gang, Lisa
Subject: May 2002 Transmission from WALC

Please reply to confirm totals

John Paulsen G4220
Western Area Power DSW
Power Scheduling
Paulsen@WAPA.GOV
602-352-2557


So, is this ok now?

D

	From:  Stella L Morris                           01/11/2000 11:09 AM

To: Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Revision - Black Marlin - meter 986782 for 8/98 - UA4

The above meter is non-allocatable and was off system, actuals at meter #8693.
Thanks, Stella

---------------------- Forwarded by Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2000
11:01 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Stella L Morris                           12/28/99 05:55 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revision - Black Marlin - meter 986782 for 8/98 - UA4

Revision - According to measurement, there is flow of 7,394 in 8/98, however,
there is nothing to indicate this is gas that was received on HPL in OSS.   I
checked MIPs and there is a measurement statement that supports the flow rate
of 7,394 MMBTu.

Daren is there a deal in CPR which may not have fed over to OSS?   I checked
OSS for the whole year of 1998 and there are no other deals in OSS.  It does
seem strange that this is the only month of flow.

Thanks, Stella


Thanks Maribel.  Call me for any questions.
Dick  3-6657

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Monterrey, Maribel
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:27 PM
To:	Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha
Cc:	Heard, Marie; Robinson, Richard T.
Subject:	PH Glatfelter Company ISDA worksheet

Please see the PH Glatfelter Company ISDA worksheet. If you have any questions, please call me.

 << File: P H Glatfelter.xls >>

Thanks,
Maribel M Monterrey
Office: (713) 853-9048
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Maribel.Monterrey@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 10:54
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
11/02/2000 10:54 AM
To: Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S
Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Voter stuff

http://www.tax.co.harris.tx.us/


any chance of you coming over here, when you get a minute

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bowler, Tim
Sent:	Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:20 PM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:19 PM
To:	Bowler, Tim
Subject:	you have a minute


Hello Mr. Taylor:

I wasn't sure if your voice mail was working so I decided to e-mail you
regarding the TULA Conference in October.  Time is running short and Mr.
Suggs needs to get the TULA Papers approved, and I was wondering what the
status is on your papers.

Please feel free to e-mail me at WhiteS@EpEnergy.com or call me at
713-420-6796.

Thank you,

Susan White
El Paso Energy Corporation
Law-Marketing & Field Services Department

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
- -  Seeking Advice of Counsel - -

Attached is a draft public statement for your review and comment.

The groundrules for using these statements are as follows:

All press inquiries should be directed to Eric Thode.

We will use the more "basic statement" unless press inquiries are specific
and informed by knowledgeable industry participants.

We will use only those parts of the more detailed statement which are
necessary.

The document begins with a background piece to briefly educate Enron
personnel who may not be aware of Project Stanley but may be called upon to
respond to regulators' or customers' inquiries.

Aleck - - please get Seabrou's help filling in the blanks.

Richard - - feel free to forward to outside counsel as you see fit.


Paula, I included both your addresses.


SENT ON BEHALF OF BRITT DAVIS:

This is to invite you to the annual Litigation Unit In-house Ethics CLE
Seminar, which we have scheduled for Thursday, November 9, 2000, at the
Doubletree at Allen Center.  As in the past, we are proud to present as our
speaker Prof. John Dzienkowski of the University of Texas School of Law.  An
open bar will be available from 4:30-5:00 p.m.; the presentation will take
place from 5:00-6:00 p.m; and there will be a post-presentation open bar
(with plenty of boiled shrimp and other finger food) available from 6:00-7:00
p.m.  We anticipate obtaining one hour ethic's credit from the Texas Bar for
this presentation.  We will be videotaping it for the use of those whose
schedules do not permit them to attent.  As always, this is at no cost to you.

If you plan to attend, please RSVP to Deborah Shahmoradi by e-mail as soon as
you can.

We look forward to seeing you there!

Britt K. Davis
Enron Litigation Unit


FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	enron_update@concureworkplace.com@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, October 27, 2001 1:18 AM
To:	James Derrick Jr.
Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - Lunch

The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  System
Expense Report Name: Lunch
Report Total: $46.05
Amount Due Employee: $46.05
Amount Approved: $46.05
Amount Paid: $46.05
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


I bought 5.22, the bid is now at 5.28, what should i do?


- Hugs.jpeg


New correlations drop TX group VAR by $3.2MM

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dahlke, Andrea
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 8:53 AM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Cc:	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:	RE: correlations

Frank-

Doug is actually out of the office today, but I wanted to check with you and see where we are at on the issue of revising his correlations in the VaR engine.  The VaR for the Ercot desk is $6 million today (limit of $5 million), so I know he is anxious to resolve this.

Thanks!

Andrea

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Cc:	Evans, Casey; Dahlke, Andrea; Presley, Mike E
Subject:	RE: correlations

Doug,
Is this the same function used in Enpower's port calc?  As an aside, Mike brought up a point that the correl excel function is using actual prices, similar to calc'ing pnl using price instead of price change?seems like "correl" should be operating off second layer of data, ie. log returns or price changes?(variance, covariance)

Out of due diligence, we should confirm that this is not the same function/operation utilized by valuation engine?(let's cross fingers)

Please keep me posted.
Thanks,
Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:27 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank; Presley, Mike E
Cc:	Dahlke, Andrea; Evans, Casey; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	correlations

 << File: Doug_Correlation_103101.xls >>

Here are the correlations for selected term structures. Please feel free to ask for further info if necessary. Based on this, it looks like moving the correlations closer to 70-80% would be prudent while still being conservative.

Thanks,

Doug


Charles Schwab <http://schwab.ed4.net/htdocs/images/EMSchwabWhiMed.gif>

As of Friday, September the 14th the markets are preparing to reopen Monday, September 17. The financial exchanges and brokerage firms, including Schwab, are conducting extensive system testing over the weekend to ensure smooth operation Monday.

Important Information:
Financial market update and FAQs related to recent events <http://email.schwab.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=03989039MI4CFd$012000mdtpjdtmD>

Information on Order Types <http://email.schwab.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=0397I039MI4CFd$012000mdtpjdtmD>

Market Volatility <http://email.schwab.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=0398F039MI4CFd$012000mdtpjdtmD>

What to Expect on Monday

As we have communicated earlier, there may be some short- term price volatility when the market opens. Accordingly, you may want to consider whether to use a limit order or a market order when placing a trade. (Click here <http://email.schwab.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=0397I039MI4CFd$012000mdtpjdtmD> for more information on order types). In addition, with potential strains on systems due to heavy volumes, you may experience operational or execution delays. (Click here <http://email.schwab.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=0398F039MI4CFd$012000mdtpjdtmD> for more information on market volatility).

We are Here to Help

All necessary steps have been taken to ensure the continued normal functioning of Schwab's systems and operations. We stand ready to assist you with questions, advice and servicing needs. You can call us at 1-800-435-4000 seven days a week, 24 hours a day, access our schwab.com <http://email.schwab.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=0397K039MI4CFd$012000mdtpjdtmD> website, or visit a Schwab office near you.

As an industry and as a firm, we have successfully worked through challenging markets in the past and are here today helping to ensure your financial security and success, now and in the future.

We will monitor the situation closely. We encourage you to check schwab.com <http://email.schwab.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=0397K039MI4CFd$012000mdtpjdtmD> and listen to news reports for up-to-the minute information.

  _____

Notice: All email sent to or from Charles Schwab corporate email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by Schwab personnel.

For your protection, we are unable to accept instructions to change your email address sent in reply to this message. To update your address <http://email.schwab.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=039Cm039MI4CFd$012000mdtpjdtmD>, please log in to your account using the link below. From there you will be able to update your email information securely.

? 2001 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved. Member SIPC/NYSE. (0901-0363)


those certainly were the good ole days.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Wednesday, July 18, 2001 12:32 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:

Do you remember the time when Bo sold us 500 F's before the open?  I was just reminiscing about the good old days.......


The 8:30 AM Tuesday risk meeting on 9/4/01 is cancelled for commodity risk groups. The regular daily status meeting will proceed as scheduled.

Please let me know if you have any suggestions for topics for the following week's meeting. Thanks.


Wilson,

You should get a call from Suzanne, my assistant.  We're trying to set things
up for Thursday am.  How does that look?

Kay

"Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com> on 05/15/2001 10:43:20 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA et al and Enron transaction

Kay,

Sorry to be so slow in getting back to you. I'm generally available for the
rest of the week. I have several lunch meetings, but my schedule is free
otherwise.


Also, GWF is a QF developper from back in the days when QFs roamed the earth. Rather small player at that as best as we can tell.


Jim: Take mids and add $0.05 for basis and $0.015 for index. Please call if
you have any questions. Brad


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000
02:01 PM ---------------------------

Jim Dyer <Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu> on 05/02/2000 12:04:06 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: Sheridan Titman <Sheridan.Titman@bus.utexas.edu>
Subject: RE: Real Options

Vince,

 If you take a cab, ask them to take you to the College of Business
building at the corner of 21st and Speedway.  The main entrance to the
business school is on Speedway, across from the old gymnasium.  Come in the
main entrance, which has a large, glass structure, and you will be on the
second floor.  Go to your left and ride up the first set of escalators to
the third floor.  When you step off of the escalators, you'll be facing
north and continue in that direction through two sets of glass doors into
the northern side of the building.  This is where most faculty offices are
found.  My office is 3.218, which is in the northwest corner of the
building.

 If you have any problems, you should be able to ask directions from
most anyone in the halls.  I will look for you around 11:00 on Thursday, and
will be happy to provide any other transportation that you need.  Please let
me know if you have any other questions.

 Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 9:23 AM
To: Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com;
Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
Subject: RE: Real Options

Jim,

I can  take a cab or get a rental car from the airport  (thanks for your
kind offer).
I shall appreciate, however, if you could drop me off at the hotel before
dinner.

The time allocation for my speech is about right. I think I shall need
about 90
minutes.

Please let me know where we can meet on Thursday.  I shall be at an
off-site
on Wednesday but you can reach me on my cell phone (713 410 5396)
and by sending a cc message to my AOL address: vkaminski@aol.com.

I  look forward to meeting you.

Vince

Jim Dyer <Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu> on 05/01/2000 01:42:44 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   Sheridan Titman <Sheridan.Titman@bus.utexas.edu>
Subject:  RE: Real Options

Vince,

     I could pick you up at the airport, or you could rent a car and come
to campus.  I have made tentative plans for us to go to lunch with some
other faculty between 11:30 and 12:00, and then you would have some time to
visit with Sheridan and perhaps with some other faculty members as well
between lunch and my class.

     Sheridan and a guest speaker from his class, Suresh Sundaresan from
Columbia, will be joining us for dinner.  I could provide transportation to
your hotel, and pick you up for dinner as well if you consider that to be
the most convenient alternative.

     I will have a PC available in the classroom, with Office 2000 and
windows NT.  You could use powerpoint with no difficulty from that machine,
if that's most convenient.  You could simply email the presentation, and I
would have it for you if you prefer.

     How much time would you like?  I would like to reserve about 30
minutes at the end for a general discussion of issues related to real
options, and about 30 minutes at the beginning of class for some remarks
regarding the final assignment and a class evaluation by the students
(which
is required for all classes).  At some point, we should take a brief break,
so that would leave approximately 1.5 to 2 hours for your presentation if
you would like that flexibility.  Otherwise, I could take up the "slack".

     I look forward to seeing you on Thursday.

     Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 11:21 AM
To: Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Re: Real Options

Jim,

I am scheduled to arrive in Austin on May 4 at 10:32 a.m.
I shall be glad to join you and a group of your colleagues for lunch.
I am flying back to  Houston Friday morning and we can meet for dinner
after
the class.

I shall have a Power Point presentation on my PC. I can also
prepare a set of transparencies if this is more convenient for you.

Vince

Jim Dyer <Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu> on 04/27/2000 05:44:51 AM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   Sheridan Titman <Sheridan.Titman@bus.utexas.edu>
Subject:  Real Options

Vince,

     I am traveling at this time, attending a NSF meeting in Washington.
However, I wanted to touch base regarding plans for your presentation in my
class on real options next Thursday (May 4).  As you recall, the class is
from 3:30 to 6:30, and you could plan to take a significant part of that
time for your presentation.  Sheridan Titman has agreed to join us after
his
class at about 6:00 for a 30 minute "panel discussion" with the students on
issues related to real options in practice.l

     I am not sure about your travel plans, but we would be happy to plan
lunch on Thursday with several of my colleagues.  I would also be delighted
to be your host for dinner on Thursday night if that is convenient for you.

     I'll be back in my office on Monday, and will look forward to
hearing from you.

     Jim

James S. Dyer
Fondren Centennial Chair in Business
Department of Management Science and Information Systems
CBA 5.202
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas 78712-1175

Email:  j.dyer@bus.utexas.edu
Telephone:  512-471-5278
Fax:  512-471-0587


Please revise the natural gas nomination for the MTBE Plant for December 2000
as follows:

10,000 mmbtu for the first 15 days of the month
  2,000 mmbut for the last half of the month

---------------------- Forwarded by Maritta Mullet/GPGFIN/Enron on 11/27/2000
05:01 PM ---------------------------

Maritta Mullet
11/27/2000 04:44 PM
To: David Bush/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Mark Diedrich/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Steven M
Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Fox/ECF/Enron@ENRON,
David M Johnson/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Robert E Lee/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita
Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregg Lenart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Meers/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON,
Michael Mitcham/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L
Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kerry
Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Sally Shuler/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: NATURAL GAS NOMINATION FOR DECEMBER 2000

Enron Methanol nominates the following natural gas requirements for the
Methanol Plant for December 2000:

33,000 mmbtu per day

EGPFC nominates the following natural gas requirements for the MTBE Plant at
Morgan's Point for December 2000:

12,000 mmbtu per day for the first 15 days of the month.  None for the last
half of the month.  MTBE plant will be down after December 15.


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2000
07:30 AM ---------------------------

Mark McClure
04/05/2000 02:55 PM
To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Bussell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary L Payne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to
Assignment)

Volume Management should be fine with this change. All name changes will be
still attached to the original path of the Buy/Sell deal. The Settlement
Group will have to make sure that the new name that is being added to the
deal has the appropriate 'Statement Group' attached.  Other than that this
change should flow smoothly.

Thanks,
m.m.

From:  Donna Greif
 04/05/2000 01:18 PM

To: Kathryn Bussell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
McClure/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary L Payne/HOU/ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne
Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karie
Hastings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunaid Engineer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Gullion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to
Assignment)

FYI....

This change went in for the Deal Validation group.   It gives them the
ability to change counterparties names after bridge back.

Impact to Logistics - Unify
If a counterparty name change takes place to deals that have been bridge
backed, it could cause problems on EDI pipes as that new counterparty name
will flow over to Unify and repathing should eventually take place.
One problem may be with the Imbalance data sets, which are not in production
yet......(EDI Imbalance Qtys would not match up to paths)
This may also cause an issue with the scheduled quantities (especially where
nominations were sent for entire month)
can't remember the rules on this one, but I think Unify does have some safe
guards (idiot proofs) to force re-pathing.
Unify does have the ability to over-ride duns numbers, yet would still cause
an additional step for EDI the scheduler would need to think through in order
to get a clean quick response.
What are (if any) impacts to Vol Mgt if counterparty name changes take
place?  (prior periods?  re-pathing?)

I have a call into Diane and Dave both.  After speaking w/ them, hopefully I
can get a clear understanding of the true impact.  I am sure we'll need to
put some processes and procedures together for Deal Validation to follow when
these type of changes are needed.

Will keep you posted.

Thanks,

dg

	From:  Thomas Engel                           04/05/2000 09:44 AM

To: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ
Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karie Hastings/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT, William E
Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunaid Engineer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Gullion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to Assignment)

Regarding the ability to change counterparties on deals in SITARA with
confirmed volumes - Tom's words of caution:

If someone calls you and wants to change a counterparty - we created the
ability for you to invalidate the deal - and
then change the counterparty - however - I did add a warning message:

"Warning - changing counterparty on deal with confirmed volumes - make sure
pipeline allows this change."

Some pipelines do not allow us to change counterparties after there is
feedback - I assume for the same reasons
we had this rule - it used to blow up our old scheduling systems
(pre-UNIFY).  Some pipelines will require a new
deal and we will have to zero out the old deal.

Before you make the change - make sure the logistics person is aware - just
in case it causes problems with their
pipeline.   Sorry - I don't know which pipes these are - you will have to ask
the UNIFY team.

There is one rule still in place - you can change from ENA-IM East to ENA-IM
Market East - but not from
ENA-IM Texas to HPLC-IM HPLC - when changing business units - they must be
the same legal entity.
"Warning - not the same legal entity"

Also - beware of making contract and counterparty changes to Service deals
(Transport Capacity, Storage, Cash Out).
Once the deal is invalidated - there are no rules.  Don't forget - the items
were locked down for a reason.
 If you invalidate a service deal - and change the previously locked down
data that was validated - and someone used these
deals in UNIFY - it is highly likely that the UNIFY deals and paths created
using these deals will get corrupted.  Always check
with someone from UNIFY to make sure no one used these deals for anything in
UNIFY.

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2000 09:47
AM ---------------------------
From: Scott Mills on 04/04/2000 07:38 PM
To: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to Assignment)

With the release that was put out Tuesday evening, Deal Validation should be
able to change the counterparty on deals where the volume is something other
than expected (e.g. confirmed, nominated, scheduled, etc.).

In addition, this release will also capture "near-time" the contract changes
that are made in global.  This means that need for server bounces will not be
necessary.

 New/Changes to contracts will show up without having to get out of deal
manager.
 New Counterparties, and new/changes to facilities will require getting out
of all active Sitara apps (except for launch pad).
  Once out of all apps, start a new app - the respective information that you
are looking for will appear.

I mention "near-time" because we are constrained by the amount of time it
takes for the change in Global data to trigger an alert for Sitara who then
updates its information

SRM (x33548)

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
04/04/2000 03:41 PM
To: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana
Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle
Horn/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changes in Global due to Consent to Assignment

The following changes will be made in the Global Contracts database due to
receipt of executed Consent to Assignment for the following contracts:

Current Counterparty Name   Contract Type  Contract #   'New' Counterparty
Name
CES - Commonwealth Energy Services  GISB   96029892  Commonwealth Energy
Services

CES - Samuel Gary Jr. & Associates, Inc  GISB   96029302  Samuel Gary Jr. &
Associates

CES - South Jersey Gas Company  GISB   96029143  South Jersey Gas Company

CP name change and Contract Type correction (Contract Type different than
that provided by CES)
Per CES
CES - Southwest Gas Corporation  1/1/98 GISB  96029146

Per Contract File
CES - Southwest Gas Corporation  04/14/93 Master Purchase/Sale Interruptible
(will edit Global #96029146)
&
CES - Southwest Gas Corporation  12/01/94 Master Sale Firm   (created new
Global record to accommodate this K, #96037402)

Please note that Southwest Gas Corporation has consented to the assignment of
both of these contracts.


FYI.  This regards the meeting we set up between ENA and DWR to try to
resolve the block forward issue with the PX, and the credit issue generally
with DWR.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 10:30 AM -----

	Christian Yoder@ECT
	02/08/2001 07:09 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C
Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
pgboylston@stoel.com, jklauber@llgm.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tomorrow

Here is what is going on with CDWR tomorrow as best I can put it together now.

Richard Sanders, Gary Fergus and I, with Elizabeth Sager available by phone,
are going to meet in Sacramento with the General Counsel of CDWR, two other
attornies and their outside counsel by phone.  The meeting is scheduled for
approx. 2:00 p.m. through 5:00 p.m.

We are going to be trying to get CDWR to negotiate and sign the EEI agreement
we sent to them as part of our RFB package.  We are also going to have our
block forward positions documented in a Confirmation Letter under the EEI
agreement and will ask them to negotiate and sign this letter too.  Finally,
we will give them a document which we will suggest they use to go to the
banks which are holding the LC's related to the block forward trades, which
document will facilitate the transfer of the LC's to CDWR's bank.

The following people have been working together on various aspects of these
negotiations, and may I suggest that the these people try to coordinate their
efforts tomorrow morning as follows to help us when we get to the negotiation
table:

Shari Stack is going to prepare the Confirmation Letter showing our block
forward trades.  Monica Lande will confirm the positions and Steve Hall is
going to help Shari make sure the Confirm is ready to fax to me in Sacramento
around noon.  Elizabeth is going to help us get appropriate language in the
Confirm to address the situation that would arise if the transfer of the
block forward trades ever falls apart.

John Klauberg, working with Pat Boylston,  is going to provide us with a
Regulatory Out Clause for our EEI  agreement.  John, please e'mail the clause
to Pat, Elizabeth and Steve Hall.  Steve, please coordinate any comments on
the clause and get it ready to fax to me by noon.

Please communicate to me tomorrow morning through Steve Hall,  503-464-7795,
or my pager at 800-449-7147.  Thanks. ----cgy


Heard on the radio this morning that they're announcing tour dates tomorrow
or the next day - might wanna check into it!

Mandy


I agree that we are losing money.  That's not the reason for getting out of this case.  What is the upside?  Even if we win, we are only forcing FERC to reconsider at some later time.  Is this really the best strategy?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah
Subject: FW: Enron v. FERC appeal at DC federal court (Entergy source
and sink)

FYI.  If you are in agreement, Sarah and I will find out who to contact and see if something helpful can be worked out.  Otherwise, we will stay in the appeal. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:52 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: RE: Enron v. FERC appeal at DC federal court (Entergy source
and sink)

The source sink issue continues to be a huge thorn in our side and costs my group significant $'s every year.   I estimate $10-15 million per year is lost by our cash traders every year due to the inflexibility in the daily and weekly market.

Therefore, we should continue to fight this issue hard to rectify as soon as possible.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Presto, Kevin M.; Shapiro,
Richard
Subject: Enron v. FERC appeal at DC federal court (Entergy source and
sink)

The mediator in our appeal of the Entergy source and sink suggested that Enron may want to try and settle this.  I asked B&P for the costs to get through oral argument, which are only $4000.  During the course of our SE RTO mediation, the Entergy person working on congestion management agreed with me that implementation of the LMP/financial rights model in the SE would alleviate the need for the Entergy Attachment M and Southern's similar attachment.  However, that model (should we get it) won't be in effect until sometime next year (at the earliest).  Also, Enron has sold its control areas. (VEPCO, our co-appellant, still has Batesville in Entergy).

It seems that it would make sense for us to approach FERC staff working on this matter, get their thoughts, and then perhaps approach Entergy.  FERC is the one that would actually settle, not Entergy (also, FERC must change the policy -- getting Entergy to simply withdraw Att. M is certainly good for precedent, but Southern can still keep its Att. unless FERC makes Southern change its tariff).  If nothing else, having another FERC avenue to voice our support for the LMP financial rights model (no day ahead balanced schedules), which alleviates this discriminatory practice like Entergy Att. M, would be helpful.  What are your thoughts?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacqueline Java [mailto:jjava@bracepatt.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:37 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: Costs associated with the Enron v. FERC matter

Christi -

Dan has informed me that Enron's share of remaining costs in the Enron v. FERC matter will not exceed $4,000, for the work done to prepare for oral argument scheduled for November 7, 2001.

If you need a more formal document indicating this, I would be happy to send one to you.  Please let me know.  Thanks.

Jackie

Jacqueline R. Java
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, N.W. Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20006-1872
(202) 828-5828


Joe:

The GISB contracts for TXU are acceptable. I'm filling in the blanks and waiting for Theresa Vos to send me some info. Left a message for Tim Powell stating that I should have these contracts back to him by today. Regarding an invoice, Theresa will prepare it but how much gas did we sell TXU? Price? etc. Or do I get that from Tim??

MM


Dave Delaney and Jim Fallon need the following information for a meeting tomorrow at noon.   They need to know which BU all ENW and ISC employees support (i.e. EGM, EIM, EBS, EES, and ENA).
I've provided all the employees that remain in the estate in the spreadsheet below for you.   There's a tab for each of you with all of your Estate employees listed.    Please designate which company each employee supports and return by 11 AM tomorrow.
I apologize for the short notice.
Thanks for your help.
H


-----Original Message-----
From: Tyler.Hearon@nyc.rabobank.com
[mailto:Tyler.Hearon@nyc.rabobank.com]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 9:19 AM
To: clintc@rocketball.com; johnston_nicholas@jpmorgan.com;
Rpaddock@Hotmail.Com; Espinosa_Miguel@Gsb.Stanford.Edu; Grimes@Ncwd.Net;
Cmcwhert@Bankunited.Com; Andrews@Calpine.Com; Ed_Solari@Enron.Com;
Wexler@Pdq.Net; Warren_Prescott@Hotmail.Com; Bryan.Kimzey@Csfb.Com;
mark@junell.cc; bavousej@tklaw.com
Subject: RE: Many thanks to Miquel

Excellent time! Look forward to keeping it going at the wedding, Elizabeth
will be so impressed. Speaking of keeping it going, our good friend, Mr.
Kimzey, called me last night drunk as rodeo goat at about 10 PM asking me to
go out and party a little bit more. Did I miss something or did we not get
our share this weekend?

Apparently the weekend only caused Bryan to reflect on his current state of
affairs. By chance it was just the welts on his forehead from crushing cans
that caused him to start boozing all by his lonesome yesterday. Or perhaps
he just wanted to enjoy the perks of first class. Let's hope it was the
latter and had nothing to do with the frightful prospect of being a married
man in just 6 weeks.

Oh, by the way, I can assure you all Kimzey has not read a single one of
these emails yet, and likely won't till about noon. Damn slackers over there
at CSFB!

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint Cobb [mailto:clintc@rocketball.com]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 9:57 AM
To: 'Nicholas Johnston-Advisory'; Rpaddock@Hotmail.Com;
Espinosa_Miguel@Gsb.Stanford.Edu; Grimes@Ncwd.Net;
Tyler.Hearon@Nyc.Rabobank.Com; Cmcwhert@Bankunited.Com;
Andrews@Calpine.Com; Ed_Solari@Enron.Com; Wexler@Pdq.Net;
Warren_Prescott@Hotmail.Com; Bryan.Kimzey@Csfb.Com; mark@junell.cc; 'Jim
Bavouset'
Subject: RE: Many thanks to Miquel

I lost the camera - hopefully you're referring to the silver one in the blue
case? - thanks L.B.!  I had a great time as well, and I still have the
shakes to prove it.

Clint Cobb
4116 Law St.
Houston, TX  77005

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Johnston-Advisory [mailto:johnston_nicholas@jpmorgan.com]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 6:46 AM
To: Rpaddock@Hotmail.Com; Espinosa_Miguel@Gsb.Stanford.Edu;
Jbavouse@Bpl.Com; Clintc@Rocketball.Com; Grimes@Ncwd.Net;
Tyler.Hearon@Nyc.Rabobank.Com; Cmcwhert@Bankunited.Com;
Andrews@Calpine.Com; Ed_Solari@Enron.Com; Wexler@Pdq.Net;
Brian.Jinks@Bus.Utexas.Edu; Bmartin@Texas.Net;
Warren_Prescott@Hotmail.Com; Bryan.Kimzey@Csfb.Com; mark@junell.cc
Subject: Many thanks to Miquel

Great weekend - thanks to Miquel for getting us all there and hopefully
Kimzey
will now not miss the wonders of bachelorhood too much.

Found a camera - digital one in 317 - also have the elvis sun glasses - if
the
rightful owner would like to step forward - and yes we know who you are.

Cheers
Nick

This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not intended
as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial
instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, its
subsidiaries and affiliates.

==================================================================
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
==================================================================
The information contained in this message may be confidential
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.

==================================================================


The EES VaR for today is $5.9 million, down from yesterday's VaR of $6.2
million.


What kind of CIG pricing can a PRB producer get for selling gas in the Powder if you were to buy gas at Deadhorse and Glenrock?

Thanks,

Paul


Please see attached.

Stan Horton


I am missing the following deals for Jeff Richter Per APB:

Enron buys Idaho Power 25 mw of NP-15  for 12/28-12/30 at $245
Enron buys BPA     50 mw of


Aidan,

Yes, this will work for us.

Vince

"Aidan Mc Nulty" <aidan.mcnulty@riskmetrics.com> on 12/16/99 08:36:14 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CreditManager net meeting

Vincent, I cannot rearrange my schedule for tomorrow so I would like to
confirm that we will have a net-meeting of CreditManager on Friday 7th of
January at 9.30 your time.

Regards

Aidan mc Nulty
212 981 7422


Ruth, I spoke to the ADEQ about the accelerated permit program and apparently
there are some internal problems with this program and the third party
contractors which are on their "list".  At this stage of the game, they
recommended that we do not resort to this alternative as most of the work
that the contractor would do has been done by the ADEQ allready.  I then
indicated that I would be contacting the Director of the ADEQ about the
urgency of this multi million dollar project and the benefits to the state of
Arizona.  The permit engineer thought that would be a good idea. Because we
will be permitting through this agency again for Sundevil, and dont want to
upset the agency cart, I am going to speak with the permit engineers
supervisor and then to the Director of the ADEQ next week about either an
accelerated issuance of the permit or more realistically, allowance to do
some construction activities while the ADEQ is completing the review and
permit writing.  This way, I wont step on any toes.  By the way, the ADEQ
said that they dont consider this to be a PSD issue.  The following time line
for permit issuance under the Arizona laws at this stage appears to be:
another 2-3 weeks to write the permit, one month by the ADEQ technical staff
to do the required internal review and then the  EPA is given a one month
period to do their review, which is requried by the EPA for all class 1
permit applications in Arizona.  Because Im going to be in Phoenix next week,
I might be able to set a meeting up with the ADEQ Director and plead
Transwestern's case.  Ill let you know how it goes......

From: Ruth Jensen/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/07/2001 03:34 PM CDT
To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Arizona Permitting

Attached is a web site concerning expedited permitting in Arizona.

Ruth

http://www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/air/permit/index.html#permit


The party originally scheduled for Thursday night at Kells has been
cancelled.  The farewell party at OBA tomorrow night will include our phantom
farewell.

Where:  Oba, 555 NW 12th
When:  Tuesday, December 19th, 4:30 pm

Hope to see you there!
---------------------- Forwarded by Mollie Gustafson/PDX/ECT on 12/18/2000
03:49 PM ---------------------------

Mollie Gustafson
12/15/2000 03:41 PM
To: Portland West Desk
cc:
Subject: Farewell Gathering

There will be a farewell gathering on Thursday, December 21, 2000, 5:30 PM at
Kells Irish Pub, 112 SW 2nd Ave.  This is a phantom farewell, to find out who
the departed one is you must come to the party!

Shhhh.....it's a surprise for all!

Hope to see you there!

Mollie

PS. Please don't ask me, I don't like to lie!


Cornbelt called and said they have an outage on Friday the 8th. They would like for us to limit Hubbard to 4000 hp from 9am to 16pm. Pierre will go out and put the limits into the program. Also, all the Waterloo units are available, however, if unit # 6 is needed they need to balance the power cylinders.


Hi Shielah,

I agree with changing the deal to reflect a Chicago Gas Daily-Daily Flat for
the December 22-26 time period.  Please ask Julie to change the ticket, I
always get confused.  Thanks


Greetings Justin and Laura:
As we discussed there is a significant coalition of folks working at the
Legislature to try to remove the prohibition on Direct Access included in
Hertzberg's AB1X and recently signed by the Governor.

Simply put, it is clear that the prohibition will only be removed if the
business community communicates clearly  and unequivocally and vociferously
to the Legislature that Direct Access is a priority for business, and that
the Legislature must amend AB1X to permit Direct Access.

I've attached the media plan developed by the PR firm that's working with ARM
(Alliance for Retail Markets) to increase the focus on the need to re-instate
Direct Access.  The ARM coalition of energy service providers has been the
focal point of the ever-growing coalition that has developed (and continues
to develop) around the Direct Access issue.

In order to succeed, it is critical to get as many members of the Silicon
Valley Manufactures' Group to join in the effort and participate actively,
particularly in the media effort.

My colleague Sue Mara has been a key player in the ARM coalition and in the
development of the medial effort.  She can provide you with any information
and/or assistance that you need and can also get you in contact with Edelman,
the PR firm directing the media effort.  Sue's number is 415.782.7802.  Her
email is smara@enron.com.

And, as always, you can contact me at any time (415.782.7822).

Looking forward to any participation that you folks can offer.

All the best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 01:08 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	02/28/2001 11:00 AM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com"
<sgahn@enron.com>, "vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com"
<wcurry@enron.com>, "William.S.Bradford@enron.com"
<William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, John
Neslage <john.neslage@enron.com>, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: [Fwd: Direct Access Coalition Media Plan]

Attached, please find the latest information from the direct access
coalition.

Received: (qmail 77871 invoked by uid 41); 28 Feb 2001 04:07:03 -0000
Received: from nycxims1.edelman.com (63.96.56.110)  by mx7.quiknet.com with
SMTP; 28 Feb 2001 04:07:03 -0000
Received: by nycxims1.edelman.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<FY7A0FGF>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:46:37 -0500
Message-ID: <F1011D165600D411AC5400D0B720EE10A621F8@SFOXMB1>
From: "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
To: dhunter@smithandkempton.com, brbarkovich@earthlink.net,
wbooth@booth-law.com, drothrock@cmta.net, jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com,
kmills@cfbf.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, mday@gmssr.com,  nplotkin@tfglobby.com,
spahnn@hnks.com, wlarson@calstate.edu,  vincent.stewart@ucop.edu,
gharrison@calstate.edu, sgovenar@govadv.com,  hgovenar@govadv.com,
smccubbi@enron.com, lhastings@cagrocers.com,  theo@ppallc.com,
cra@calretailers.com, mmoretti@calhealth.org,  wbrown@lhom.com,
randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com, "DiMare, Dominic"
<Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, vjw@ceert.org, rcavanagh@nrdc.org,
rochmanm@spurr-remac.org, rrichter@calhealth.org, ken_pietrelli@ocli.com,
dennis.flatt@kp.org, richard.seguin@kp.org, arm@phaser.com,
djsmith@smithandkempton.com, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "Allen, Stevan"  <stevan.allen@edelman.com>,
"Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>,  "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "Warner, Jami"  <jami.warner@edelman.com>
Subject: Direct Access Coalition Media Plan
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:46:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0A139.07D39B10"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Hello to the Direct Access Coalition:

Below you will find a summary of the press strategy that Edelman Public
Relations intends to employ over the coming weeks in collaboration with the
Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and the broader Direct Access Coalition.
I will also outline the information that I need from Direct Access Coalition
members who are willing to be involved in media outreach and interviews.
And finally, I have attached supporting documents that you can use as
background material to prep for your responses to any media inquiries that
you may receive.

This Week

1.   We are drafting a "pitch letter" to send out by the end of this week
via blast e-mail and fax to the following media lists: 1)capitol press corps
reporters; 2) mainstream media reporters working the energy crisis; and 3)
trade media.  We may also outreach to our editorial board list as well.  Our
pitch will be focused on what it will really mean for small business and C&I
customers to lose the option of retail choice at a time when they are
suffering the financial hardships of skyrocketing energy bills. We will
address the effect on California's future business climate if direct access
is not preserved through legislation that corrects the problems that AB1x
caused for retail choice.  And finally, we will address the point that no
matter what direction California ultimately takes, direct access must be a
part of the solution.  Reporters have seen the recent polls which illustrate
California businesses' concerns with the path the state is on so this is a
prime opportunity to build on those recent media stories.

2.    We recommend a conference call with AReM and the Direct Access
Coalition on Friday to address the questions and suggestions on the press
strategy outlined here.

3.     Determine which people in the Direct Access Coalition are willing to
take media calls on behalf of the coalition.

Next Week

1.   Follow up with key reporters who received the pitch letter.

2.   Evaluate the language of SB 27x and determine whether there will be an
opportunity to hold a news conference with Sen. Bowen in the near future.
Monitor movement at the PUC and determine whether a press conference may be
effective in this arena, or whether we may need to use the option of sending
a media alert before the March 7 hearing, followed by a news release after
the hearing.

3.   Place op-eds (opinion pieces) with key newspapers.

4.   Contact radio news shows and TV public affairs shows (i.e. California
Capitol Week and the California Report) to secure
media interviews.

5.    Revise the SB 27x fact sheet (attached) to reflect the realities of
the amended language in SB 27x.

 What We Need From You

1.  If you are willing to speak with the media, or you have
customers/clients with a positive direct access story to tell, please
respond to this email as soon as you can with your name and contact
information.

2.  If you have draft op-eds written that need to be placed with newspapers
on behalf of your association and the broader coalition, we are willing to
do this for the you.

3.  If you have colleagues and/or staff that are already working with the
media it would be helpful to have this information so that we can
collaborate as necessary.

The Documents Below

>  All documents are works in progress, so if you have suggestions on
> potential changes, please feel free to share them with us.
>

Thank you.

>  <<AREM Fact Sheet 2212001 ver 2272001.doc>>
>  <<Q&A @ ESP Reversions 22701.doc>>  <<AReM FAQ FINAL3.doc>>  <<AREM Fact
> FINAL3.doc>>
>
> Tracy Fairchild
> Account Supervisor
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
> (916) 442-2331
> tracy.fairchild@edelman.com
>

 - AREM Fact Sheet 2212001 ver 2272001.doc
 - Q&A @ ESP Reversions 22701.doc
 - AReM FAQ FINAL3.doc
 - AREM Fact FINAL3.doc


To all:

I am out the week of the 4th of July, although if you need any information
for the letter to Cage, the file is on my desk (an orange file labeled 'Cage
Gas').

Thanks

Russell

---------------------- Forwarded by Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000
04:31 PM ---------------------------

From:  Russell Diamond
     06/30/2000 10:47 AM

To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cage -Termination Amount

Debbie,

Below is the termination payment as calculated by the Structuring group.
This is the amount we should use when notifying Cage of their payment owed
ENA.  I think we should send a letter out to them with the amount owed to
ENA.  I do not know if it is necessary to mention the draw on the L/C, which
we have received.

Thanks

Russell

---------------------- Forwarded by Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Moon                           06/30/2000 09:29 AM

To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Russell,

The costs for the Cage Gas Transaction are outlined below:

June 16, 2000 - June 19, 2000  = $9,537
June 20, 2000 = $2,272
June 21, 2000 - June 30, 2000 = $21,255
July 1, 2000 - End of Deals = $735,696
---------------------------------------------------------

TOTAL COST  =  $768,761

edm


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 4:48 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: Broker balances

Sara,
Has Enron Credit filed for Bankruptcy?  [Shackleton, Sara]  not yet  If not, do we try to sell the positions? [Shackleton, Sara]   Enron Credit Limited is reviewing the positions and I am engaging our bankruptcy lawyers to see what type of structure is plausible  I do not even know who the Authorized traders are on the account.
Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 4:17 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Broker balances

Sara,

The attached shows our balances at GS and Bear Stearns.

1) Bear Stearns owes us $3.9 million to ECT Investments, Inc.
	Ena is owed 159,022
	Enron Credit Inc has positive liquidating equity at BS of $14,013,523 which includes cash and positions.

2) Goldman Sachs ENA account grouping includes a positive cash balance of 1,493,288 which belongs to Enron Credit Inc.  As discussed, GS will not touch any monies relating to ENA.

3)  Enron Credit Inc. has a positive cash balance of 132,680 at MSDW.  It is segregated from any other entity's balances.

Adding up all three pieces of Enron Credit is $15.6 million, which includes positions and cash balances and presumes that the market value used by the prime broker is correct for some of these illiquid positions.

Please call so we can discuss.

Thanks.
Sheila
3-3210

 << File: prime broker wind down balances.xls >>


Kashka Kubzdela
5411 S. Blackstone Ave. 3
Chicago, IL 60615
kkubzdela@csc.cps.k12.il.us

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Kashka Kubzdela


Car Rental Options for Enron Travelers

Rental car contracts for 2001 have been awarded to:

National Car Rental (Primary) and  Alamo Rent-A-Car (Secondary).

The intent of these agreements is to consolidate and leverage Enron's total
car rental spend to achieve the most favorable rates and non-pricing
provisions (i.e. insurance).

National Car Rental, due to its service levels, availability and total value
proposition, has been awarded Primary status and is recommended as the first
choice for Enron travelers' needs.

Alamo Rent-A-Car, a sister company to National, has been awarded a contract
reflecting a Secondary status, due to its service levels, availability and
low cost solutions.  Alamo is recommended as an alternative to National,
where available.

When you rent a vehicle in the United States, (including Puerto Rico) or
Canada, the following insurance provisions are included, regardless of rate
selected:
1. L/DW (Loss/Damage Waiver) - This is what is called Comprehensive or
Collision on your personal auto. It covers the rental vehicle and pays for
any damage to it.
2. Liability - This covers people and property outside the rental vehicle.
For both National and Alamo, the coverage is $100,000 per person, $300,000
per occurrence and $50,000 for property damage.
** IMPORTANT ***
These coverages apply regardless of rate selected, as long as the following
contract ID is communicated at the time of reservation and rental is recorded
on the transaction rental agreement.  (National -  5000838 Alamo    - #143974)

To enjoy the highest levels of service while renting a vehicle from Enron's
preferred suppliers, it is recommended that each traveler enroll in
National's and Alamo's preferred traveler programs.  National's Emerald Club
membership and Alamo's Quicksilver program are designed to speed the
transaction time by providing services such as counter bypass and rapid
return.  The enrollment fees for these programs have been waived for Enron
travelers.  Enrollment packets will be mailed to the addresses of Enron
American Express T&E Cardholders.  You may also find an enrollment form on
the Enron Travel Program intranet @ gss.enron.com <http://gss.enron.com/>.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact Jeff Leath at
713-646-6165.


Julia:  I will review.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 01:55 PM -----

	Mark Taylor
	09/11/2000 09:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

Is this something you are working on?
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 09:55 AM -----

	Julia H Chin@ENRON
	09/11/2000 08:16 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

hi mark -- this is a currency swap agreement for the pending condor follow-on
offering.  could you have some one from your group take a look of this
agreement?  we are printing the preliminary offering memo this friday and the
deal closes toward the end of this month.

thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Julia H Chin/NA/Enron on 09/11/2000 08:09
AM ---------------------------

JGallup@milbank.com on 09/09/2000 01:21:13 AM
To: barry.schnapper@enron.com, dan.boyle@enron.com,
trevor.randolph@enron.com, brian.steinbrueck@enron.com,
julia.h.chin@enron.com, gina.karathanos@enron.com, annmarie.tiller@enron.com,
Brent.Vasconcellos@enron.com, clint.walden@enron.com, ryan.siurek@enron.com,
lnath@dlj.com, dscott@dlj.com, dcapolon@dlj.com, lmallett@dlj.com,
mbdavis@dlj.com, dhemsey@dlj.com, cwebb@dlj.com, mprotz@dlj.com,
mcho@dlj.com, paul.f.cambridge@db.com, mike.jakubik@db.com,
craig.orchant@db.com, george.tyson@db.com, ross.newman@db.com,
maia.babbs@db.com, ute.muenstermann@db.com, peter.zabel@db.com,
joseph.kopec@db.com, mspradling@velaw.com, rastin@velaw.com,
eosterberg@velaw.com, tchandler@velaw.com, crankin@velaw.com,
pwarman@velaw.com, silversteina@sewkis.com, sbaratta@sewkis.com,
aroberts@wilmingtontrust.com, jlawler@wilmingtontrust.com,
gmitchell@ustrust.com, lyoung@ustrust.com, mazie@rlf.com,
tom.mazza@deweyballantine.com, joan.wheatley@deweyballantine.com,
hershel.wein@deweyballantine.com, robert.frastai@deweyballantine.com
cc: TDavis@milbank.com, BKayle@milbank.com, JGallup@milbank.com,
AWalker@milbank.com, ELim@milbank.com, SRenas@milbank.com,
KRiester@milbank.com

Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

Attached, please find a draft of the Enron Agreement for the Osprey II
transaction.? Please be advised that this draft is simultaneously being
distributed to our clients and therefore, remains subject to their review and
comments.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Best regards,

Joy K. Gallup

 <<Enron Agreement.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - Enron Agreement.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000
08:40 AM ---------------------------

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
02/22/2000 01:10 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: News article on Enron

  India: Enron aftermath

   Business Line - 02/21/2000

   Abhay Mehta

   Copyright (C) 2000 Kasturi & Sons Ltd (KSL); Source: World Reporter (TM) -
Asia Intelligence Wire

   Power Play

   A Study of the Enron Project

   * Publishers: Orient Longman, New Delhi * Price: Rs. 195

   THE Enron power project at Dabhol in Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra has
been mired in nationwide controversy ever since the
   inception of the project proposal in 1992; and the sordid tale ends only
in 1997, with the Supreme Court of India refusing to even
   admit an appeal against the Bombay High Court decision, of December 1996,
which while commenting that "This case has
   highlighted to the people as to how even after 50 years of Independence,
political considerations outweigh the public interest and
   the interest of the State and to what extent the Government can go to
justify its actions not only before the public but even before
   the courts of law" - yet dismissed a public interest petition against the
project on the (purely technical) ground of res judicata, even
   though new facts, new arguments, new evidence of the violation of the laws
of the land had been advanced by the petitioners.

   The fact that the fresh violations of the law were not even considered and
recorded, despite the petitioners adducing the required
   evidence, can only be termed as strange, perhaps bizarre.

   Abhay Mehta's simple, factual documentation - in fact a chronological
narration - of all events, including the process of bending all
   rules, of subverting the law for promoting a project involving
unparalleled future liabilities for Maharashtra, indeed for the whole of
   India - is not only masterly, it is devastating.

   It is a short, pithy book which deserves to be read from cover to cover by
all thinking citizens of this country. Barring the
   concluding chapter, the epilogue, there are no personal comments, only
facts, disseminated from the original papers, mostly 'secret'
   documents.

   All documentation has been carefully, faithfully recorded, including
extracts from supposedly 'top secret' minutes of cabinet
   committee meetings; and the specific violations of the law (which were
opposed by a few public spirited civil servants, much to
   their disadvantage) have been pointed up. Apart from an introductory
'Primer on Electricity' - introduced for the benefit of the
   layman, explaining some technical issues relating to electricity
generation, transmission and distribution - and the background of the
   events of 1991, the foreign exchange crisis, and the aftermath of the
crisis, the other fifteen chapters, three appendices and fourteen
   annexes of the small book (of 226 pages) packs in an enormous volume of
factual information. The strange saga of the Enron
   project, and the sheer magnitude of the future problems this one single
project poses for the country, need to be briefly recounted
   here, for essentially, it is the coming generation which would have to
face the problem.

   The MSEB has contracted to buy - and if not used, to pay for - 2000 MW of
electricity (for a period of 20 years) from the
   Dabhol Power Company (the legal entity set up by Enron, as an unlimited
liability company registered in India, through a maze of
   intricate crossholdings of equity by half a dozen or more 'front'
companies registered in various tax-free havens.

   Abhay Mehta has indicated the total payments to Enron over 20 years amount
to $ 35 billion (at 1998 exchange rates, around Rs.
   1,25,000 crores) over the life of the project. One must record that: (a)
crude oil/oil product prices have as of writing, more than
   doubled since the above calculations were made. A per the 'doctored'
figures presented by the company (and its advocate), the
   charge per unit of electricity supplied, at the 1998 level of prices, was
to 4.39 cent (per unit) as 'capacity charge' and 3.43 cents
   (per unit) for 'energy costs'.

   The former is indexed to the US inflation rate, and the latter to
international fuel prices. The former may be assumed to have gone
   up only marginally (rounded to 4.4 cents per unit); we know that fuel
prices have more than doubled internationally over 1999.
   Assuming the 'fuel costs' to have increased less than 100 per cent - even
though international prices have more than doubled - we
   may assume (for 1999) energy costs of 6.85 cents per units, making for a
total payment of 11.25 US cents per unit of electricity
   supplied by the Dabhol Power Company (DPC) to MSEB in late 1999, in Phase
I of the project.

   Within another two years, at 2000 MW, the annual offtake (for 365 days X
24 hours/day) would be 17.52 billion KWH; and at
   11.25 cents per unit, the total payment amounts to $1.97 billion annually;
for 20 years, this workout to $ 39.4 billion.

   This is not counting any further inflation in either energy costs or
capacity charge. At today's exchange rate - about Rs.43.5 per US
   dollar - in rupee terms this works out to wore than Rs. 175,000 crores (as
compared to Rs. 125,000 crores indicated by Abhay
   Mehta). This is the cost to MSEB in rupee; and to the country in foreign
exchange as payment to just one project authority, for
   supply of part of the power required in Maharashtra.

   The really significant point to note in this connection is that this
payment - and considerably more, depending on (a) future increase
   in'capacity charges' depending on US inflation rate, and international
prices of LNGaphtha (for 'fuel costs'), and (b) depreciation of
   the exchange rate of the rupee vis-a-vis the US dollar - is obligatory;
the assets of the MSEB, the Maharashtra government
   indeed, all assets of the Government of India (present and future) are
mortgaged to Enron, by way of sovereign guarantees
   extended by both governments.

   The other significant point in this connection is that - as predicted by
all independent Indian experts as well as the World Bank -the
   Enron project he forced the MSEB to cut its offtake of Tata Electric
Company's and its own much cheaper thermal power
   already; in a postscript dated August 1999, Abhay Mehta has indicated that
already, the MSEB had stopped buying between 200
   and 250 MW of power from Tata Electric (available at Rs. 1.80 per unit)
and has had to backdown its own Chandrapur thermal
   power station (cost of this power being Rs. 1.20 per unit), while forced
to buy more expensive Enron power at Rs. 5 per unit.

   The loss to MSEB on this count alone comes to Rs. 460 crore per year.

   This had in fact, been predicted earlier even by the World Bank.

   It is pointless here to go into the details of how precisely all this was
contrived, by a deliberate campaign of 'disinformation', of
   blatant lies, of sidelining of expert opinion, not only of independent
experts but also the GOI's own official advisers in this matter,
   namely, the Central Electricity Authority as well as that of the World
Bank, which was resolutely opposed to this project. The
   detailed facts, the letters exchanged in the above context, the pressure
tactics adopted, the flouting of all procedures norms, even
   statutory provisions of the Electricity (Supply) Act, are all carefully
documented by Abhay Mehta.

   Mehta correctly concludes: "We frequently blame external agencies - like
the World Bank - for all our problems, when, as a
   matter of fact, we ourselves are our own worst enemies. In the instant
case, the World Bank not only advised the Government of
   India against the project, it stood resolutely firm in its assessment of
the total inadvisability of this project. In fact, one must note
   here that in 1996, neighbouring Pakistan, which had entered into a
somewhat similar MoU with Enron, cancelled the project (and
   the Power Purchase Agreement with Enron), for a $ 670 million, 782 MW
residual oil-fuelled power plant, even though that
   Agreement had stipulated Enron power supply at a fixed rate of 6.4 US
cents per KWH over a 30 year period. (Note the
   estimated rate of 11.25 cents per KWH for Dabhol power for the MSEB in
December 1999, which works out to around Rs. 5
   per unit).

   One could go on; but one must leave the reader to go through Abhay Mehta's
crisp, factual, matter of fact narration of the Enron
   saga, and switch over to the point made by him in the epilogue to the
story, about 'The Next Round of Scams'.

   For quite some time, the ruling elite in India has been intent on
'privatising' all public enterprises; and even 'utilities' are no
   exception. The 'unbundling' of infrastructure with a view to privatisation
of all the 'profitable' segments. All this - as per the current
   'disinformation campaign' - is supposedly in the interest of
rationalisation and greater efficiency of poorer supply.

   The author has referred in this context to the acquisition from the
Government - by the Torrent Group - of the Ahmedabad and
   Surat Electricity companies at less than one-tenth of the market value of
the assets of thee facilities. Again, much like the Enron
   saga, all objections by the Finance Department of the Gujarat government
were overruled.

   And, Abhay Mehta has predicated that this onslaught - the break-up of
power utilities into three segments, generation, transmission
   and distribution, - with a view to their privatisation is likely to be the
new thrust by the ruling elite, for reasons that do not require to
   be spelt out.

   Though Mehta had the examples of the Torrent Group takeover of Ahmedabad
and Surat Electricity companies, and of the break
   up of the Orissa State Electricity Board before him, yet his statement can
be stated today to be prophetic; the UPSEB is now on
   the firing line. The recent strike by the workers and engineers of the
UPSEB in protest of the announced UP government decision
   to trifurcate the UPSEB; and the Union Minister of Power, Mr. Rangarajan
Kumaramangalam's statement that the UPSEB is a
   loss making, inefficient unit and that privatisation of the facilities
after the trifurcation - need to be noted.

   That 40 per cent of the dues of the UPSEB are from the UP Government; that
tariffs for UP electricity supply are fixed by the UP
   government and not by the UPSEB; that the UPSEB does not have the cash
even for routine maintenance as a result of the above
   - these are facts that nobody is prepared even to consider. That the
remedy for UPSEB lies in a different kind of reform and
   restructuring, is not even to be debated. The whole idea is to privatise
the profitable segments, and to leave the public sector entity
   with all the problem areas, including rural energy supply. It is against
this background that Abhay Mehta's book needs to be widely
   disseminated, read, and its implications understood.

   What is at stake is not a 'utility' here or a PSU there. What is at stake
is the future of some 80 per cent of the have-nots in this
   country.

   What is at stake is the 'pillory' of the assets of the nation for private
aggrandisement.

   Arun Ghosh


Kevin, how do we get at the transmission without buying the entire company?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000
08:20 AM ---------------------------

Tamara Jae Black
10/04/2000 12:36 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Idea

---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000
01:33 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           10/04/2000 12:12 PM

To: Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Idea

Please forward this to Dave and John.  My e-mail is not working for them.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000
11:54 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           10/04/2000 12:08 PM

To: Dave Delainey, John Lavorato
cc:
Subject: Idea

What do you think of a hostile bid for SOCO's transmission assets (Georgia
Power, Gulf Power, Alabama Power, Savannah Electric, & Mississippi Power &
Light), and a simultaneously create an ISO/RTO that is auctioned to the
market.  This would clearly expedite the opening of markets in the SE
significantly.

I think we could get an FPL, Duke, VEPCO, Entergy, Cinergy type company to
provide a pre-negotiated purchase price for the transmission facilities so
our capital at risk would be minimal.  Additionally, we would cut a deal with
FERC on what the new market design would look like and the ultimate
transmission owner would live with the market design.

What are your thoughts.


yes


Kay asked me to forward this document to both of you.  It has been converted
form Word Perfect to Word.


I don't.  Well, to be accurate, some physical might show up, but not the majority.  Those you'd have to get through Ellen.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 4:42 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	RE: RMT

Diane,

My request was for the financial deals.  But if you have access to the physical RMT/Intercompany -- I would like those too.

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 4:26 PM
To:	Bailey, Susan
Subject:	RMT

Susan,

Confirm for me that you want financial deals only......or not.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 1:57 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Diane,

As for the RMT matter the request is as follows:

	1.	Lives Deal as of November 30, 2001
	2.	Expired Deals since November 30, 2001
	3.	New Deals since November 30, 2001

Thanks for the help.

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 1:18 PM
To:	Bailey, Susan
Subject:	RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Ok.

And regarding the Risk Management deals......I forget what we decided....what "begin" date do you want on the query......deals from 12/1/01 forward or was in sometime in November?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 12:14 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Diane,

Thanks for confirming that the trades were with ECTRIC and not ENA -- thats what I had thought.

Yes-- please furnish copies of the confirms for the 2 deals to me.

Thanks,

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 11:16 AM
To:	Bailey, Susan; Mulvany, Patrick
Subject:	RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Susan,

I only see two and there were both done with ECTINTL.  Do you want to see those?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 10:35 AM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Mulvany, Patrick
Subject:	Sodra Skogsagarna Ek

Diane or Patrick,

Please email or provide hard copies of the Confirmation(s) ENA has with the captioned counterparty.

Thanks
Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Uncle Clark,

How are things?  I hope this note finds you well.  I wanted to see if you
were going to be in town for the weekend of November 11th.  I plan on
bringing the whole group up for the KU-UT game that weekend.  I can't believe
it has almost been 4 years since we last visited up there.  We are doing well
here in Houston.  Everyone is getting ready for the school year.  In fact,
Kristi has already started back.  The kids begin on the 9th.  Enron still
seems to monopolize my time.  But it's a great place to work.  Let me know
about that weekend.  I hope you will be in town as  I am looking forward to
seeing you all.

DG


Here are El Paso's comments to our guaranty format.  Please review and let me
know.

thanks
brant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Jones, Shelley" <Shelley.Jones@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jones+2C+20Shelley+22+20+3CShelley+2EJones+40ElPaso+2Eco
m+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 1:16 PM
To: Reves, Brant
Subject: RE: BGML - Enron/Texaco

Brant,

Please find attached comments to the guaranty formats.

Shelley Jones
Principal Credit Analyst
El Paso Merchant Energy, LP
Phone:  713-420-4827
E-mail:  joness4@epenergy.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Brant.Reves@enron.com [mailto:Brant.Reves@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 10:15 AM
To: Jones, Shelley
Subject: RE: BGML - Enron/Texaco

Here are those guaranty formats.

Let me know if I can do anything else.

thanks
brant

(See attached file: Outgoing ENE-JV Guaranty Format.doc)

(See attached file: Outgoing TEX-JV Guaranty Format.doc)

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Jones, Shelley" <Shelley.Jones@ElPaso.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jones+2C+20Shelley+22+20+3CShelley+2EJones+40ElPaso+2E
com+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, March 01, 2001 9:35 AM
   To:     Reves, Brant
   Subject:  RE: BGML - Enron/Texaco

   I did get a respond to Legal, however, can you resend the guaranty
   formats
   so I can make changes.  I apparently deleted those formats.  Thanks
   Brant!

   Shelley Jones
   Principal Credit Analyst
   El Paso Merchant Energy, LP
   Phone:  713-420-4827
   E-mail:  joness4@epenergy.com

   >  -----Original Message-----
   > From:      Reves, Brant [mailto:Brant.Reves@ENRON.com]
   > Sent:      Tuesday, February 27, 2001 8:22 AM
   > To:   Jones, Shelley
   > Subject:   RE: BGML - Enron/Texaco
   >
   > Any further update on this request?  Perhaps you might provide the
   name of
   > a legal contact?
   >
   > thanks
   > brant
   >
   >
   >
   >        -----Original Message-----
   >       From:     Jones, Shelley  [mailto:Jones.Shelley@EPEnergy.com]
   >       Sent:     Wednesday, February 21, 2001 8:28 PM
   >       To:  'Brant.Reves@enron.com'
   >       Subject:  RE: BGML - Enron/Texaco
   >
   >       Guaranties have been sent to legal.
   >
   >       Shelley Jones
   >       Principal Credit Analyst
   >       El Paso Merchant Energy, LP
   >       Phone:  713-420-4827
   >       E-mail:  joness4@epenergy.com
   >
   >
   >       -----Original Message-----
   >       From: Brant.Reves@enron.com [mailto:Brant.Reves@enron.com]
   >       Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 10:29 AM
   >       To: Jones, Shelley
   >       Cc: Trevor.Mihalik@BHLP.com
   >       Subject: RE: BGML - Enron/Texaco
   >
   >
   >
   >       Hey Shelley,
   >
   >       In follow up to this morning's voice mail regarding a status
   update.
   > Where
   >       do we stand on this request?
   >
   >       thanks
   >       brant
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >       "Jones, Shelley" <Jones.Shelley@EPEnergy.com> on 02/14/2001
   01:11:10
   > PM
   >
   >       To:   "'Brant.Reves@enron.com'" <Brant.Reves@enron.com>
   >       cc:
   >       Subject:  RE: BGML - Enron/Texaco
   >
   >
   >       Guaranties are currently being reviewed in legal.....
   >
   >       Shelley Jones
   >       El Paso Merchant Energy, LP
   >       Phone:  713-420-4827
   >       E-mail:  joness4@epenergy.com
   >
   >
   >       -----Original Message-----
   >       From: Brant.Reves@enron.com [mailto:Brant.Reves@enron.com]
   >       Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:35 AM
   >       To: Jones, Shelley
   >       Cc: Trevor.Mihalik@BHLP.com
   >       Subject: BGML - Enron/Texaco
   >
   >
   >       Any update on this request?
   >
   >
   >       ---------------------- Forwarded by Brant Reves/HOU/ECT on
   > 02/14/2001 11:33
   >       AM ---------------------------
   >
   >
   >       Brant Reves
   >       02/12/2001 10:04 AM
   >
   >       To:   JonesS4@epenergy.com
   >       cc:
   >       Subject:  BGML - Enron/Texaco
   >
   >       Hello,
   >
   >       Because Bridgeline Gas Marketing has not yet been able to
   complete
   > its
   >       year-end audit and because the Company desires to trade with
   > counterparties
   >       other than Enron and Texaco, I am sending Enron/Texaco gty
   formats
   > that we
   >       would like to put into place for the next six months.  At the
   end of
   > this
   >       period, a new gty will be provided from Bridgeline Holdings,
   with
   > support
   >       from a completed year-end audit.  Please review these formats
   that
   > have
   >       been negotiated between Enron and Texaco.  If acceptable, fill
   in
   > the
   >       relevant information and return w/ an address for hardcopy
   > overnight.
   >
   >       thanks
   >       brant
   >
   >       (See attached file: Outgoing ENE-JV Guaranty Format.doc)
   >
   >       (See attached file: Outgoing TEX-JV Guaranty Format.doc)
   >
   >
   >
   >
   ******************************************************************
   >       This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
   >       Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
   >       for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
   >       addressed. If you have received this email in error
   >       please notify the sender.
   >
   ******************************************************************
   >
   >
   >

    - C.DTF << File: C.DTF >>

 - Bridgeline Gas Marketing LLC (Enron).doc
 - Bridgeline Gas Marketing LLC (Texaco).doc


Thanks so much Vince!

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
04/23/2001 11:09 AM
To:	Althea Gordon/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:	greg.whalley@enron.com, traci.warner@enron.com, patricia.payton@enron.com

Subject:	Re: Another Stanford Acceptance

Althea

Great news. It's all your hard work.

Vince

Althea Gordon@ENRON
04/20/2001 01:43 PM
To:	vince.kaminski@enron.com, brad.romine@enron.com, brad.alford@enron.com, martin.lin@enron.com, Stephen.swain@enron.com, matt_harris@enron.net, elliot.mainzer@enron.com, mauricio.mora@enron.com, victor.browner@enron.com
cc:	greg.whalley@enron.com, traci.warner@enron.com, patricia.payton@enron.com
Subject:	Another Stanford Acceptance

Stanford Team,

We have received yet another acceptance - Noah Jacobs has accepted our offer as a summer associate.  We are now 4 of 6 for our summer offers.  I have sent Paul Kasper, our one full time offer a cultivation gift and will be checking in on him next week.  Also Eric Cope, a Stanford student that Vince Kaminski's group had interviewed here in Houston for a summer associate position has also accepted.  All in all our Stanford numbers are looking great!

Many thanks to everyone and keep up the great work!
Althea

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Kathy,

I discussed the $35K variance with Brian yesterday, and the adjustment will
be made on the last day of March.  That will ensure that we tie to your
number for the rest of the month.  Then we'll do a top level adjustment on
the last day P&L to clear the variance from last month.  I've talked with
Brad Jones (the person preparing the NGP&L) and Brian Gillis is supposed to
remind him at the end of the month.

I start my new job in Chicago next week.  Bilal Bajwa will assume my
responsibilities.  Here are everyone's numbers.

Bilal Bajwa x713-853-3409

P&L-  Bradley Jones  x713-345-8960

Positions- Binh Pham x713-853-5791

Thanks,
Robin


Greg,

I scheduled a meeting with Norman Packard from the Prediction Company
in Houston, July the 30th, 9:00 a.m.

Liz blocked out a few hours for the meeting.

Vince


Please send a revised draft of the ISDA (no credit changes) to the following
contact via overnight delivery today per the request of Scott Shields.  He is
meeting with the customer Monday morning.  Thanks!

Karen Rodriguez
Avery Dennison Corporate Center
150 North Orange Grove Blvd
Pasadena CA 91103
(626) 304-2210


David Leboe will be the new investor relations contact working with ETS.  David has been working in investor relations for several months already and previously worked in Wholesale North America.  David will attend the weekly ETS staff meetings and will likely be tapping you for data and ideas for presentations.  His contact information is as follows:

David Leboe
EB 4931A
(713) 853-4785 Phone
(713) 646-3002 Fax

As most of you know, I will be working in Risk Analysis and Control starting June 1.  I will have a new extension soon - if you need to reach me, Yoli Mendez at x33956 can track me down.

Scott


Dear Eric,  The Washington bureau will have the latest on the anthrax scare on Capitol Hill on Thursday.  Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says the decision to shut down the House of Representatives until Tuesday means at least one energy hearing on MTBE will be delayed.  The Senate remains in session and we hope to hear from Senators on Thursday about the situation.   Peter also says the bureau will have more reaction to the news that Department of Energy official Joe Kelliher has been picked by  President Bush to fill the vacant seat at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.  Kelliher's name has been on the top of the list for some time, and now the decision is official.   PSE?Director of Interregional Transmission Laura Manz will also join us from the Washington bureau on Thursday.  Manz has been participating in the FERC RTO workshop, and she'll give us her take on what might come out of the weeklong meetings.  Join us during the  10:00 a.m. ET newscast for the Manz interview.   IBM Chemical and Petroleum Industry Vice President of Marketing Craig Hodges is penciled in from the Houston bureau on Thursday. IBM has been selected by Shell Oil to create the prototype for a wireless gas station named the e-Station.  Catch Hodges during the  noon ET newscast.   West Coast Bureau Correspondent Kym McNicholas reports, Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham will be in California to announce a new public-private partnership regarding "Path 15," a transmission bottleneck in California.  Abraham will also give a keynote address at Hoover Institution's Conference on California's Electricity.     Also from the West Coast bureau on Thursday, Kym talks with a Spokesperson about the Valero refinery's plan to build one power plant to operate the refinery and one to sell energy to off-site customers.  The California Energy Commission is expected to decide Wednesday night whether to grant the Valero refinery, located in Benicia, a permit to build.   From the NASDAQ in New York, NYMEX President Robert Collins will join us.  He'll discuss the status of NYMEX operations and trading following the September 11th attacks during the 9:00 a.m. ET newscast.    Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap video   (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


i heard it is 8.5.  i will try to talk to someone today.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
08:19 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
03/06/2001 07:54 AM
To: audrau@yahoo.com, Memaw1995@aol.com, Kathy.Crenshaw@inteq.com @ Enron,
Kayla Crenshaw/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Anita
DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, kip.wia@alpha1.net,
emlea@usa.net, Kelly Summers/HOU/ECT@ECT, hmel5345@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Clintons leaving the Whitehouse...

Subject: Clintons leaving the Whitehouse...

<akClintons leaving White House jpeg (1).jpg>

 - akClintons leaving White House jpeg (1).jpg


FYI.  Will be in Sacramento for another meeting tomorrow and will go and
watch the Lynch and Kahn show at noon.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 06:12 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	11/30/2000 06:10 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "David Keane" <dnke@dynegy.com>, "David
Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>,
"Duane Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Frank
DeRosa" <fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Hap
Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, <iep@iepa.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>,
"Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jim Willey"
<elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Joe Ronan"
<joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Jonathan
Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kent Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>,
"Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"Robert Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Tandy
McMannes" <mcmannes@aol.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Trond Aschehoug" <taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "William Hall"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>
		 cc: "Susan McCabe" <sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Robert Ross"
<robbiz@cwo.com>, "Phil Isenberg" <Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan"
<mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Maureen OHaren" <Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Marie Moretti"
<marie_moretti@msn.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Jenn
Paulsen" <paulsen@hmot.com>, "Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>, "Hedy
Govenar" <hgovenar@acom2.com>, "Delany Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>,
"Cary Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Anne
Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "DJ Smith" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "Katie
Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>, "Jan Smutny
Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>
		 Subject: Governor's Response to FERC

The Governor's response to FERC will be available at noon tomorrow (12/1) on
his website (http://www.governor.ca.gov/), and in room 4203 in the Capitol.
Both Lynch and Kahn will be sticking around after the Green Team meeting in
room 4203 to answer press questions, although it is not a press conference.

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson+Modisette
916-552-7070
Fax- 552-7075
jmball@ns.net