In a recent organizational memo, I mentioned what a great time this is to be
at Enron.  I believe that more strongly than ever, given the new markets we
are entering, the enhanced focus of the company on markets and regions around
the world that best fit with our core competencies, and the phenomenal growth
of the company, perhaps best evidenced by the earnings report of the first
quarter.  But, there are challenges as well: California, and its regional and
global implications, and the general market conditions that have brought our
stock price well off its recent highs.  With respect to each of these and
other challenges, there are invariably opportunities: for example, the
enhanced opportunity for the FERC to finish the job of opening wholesale
electricity markets in the context of California; and, in the context of a
lower stock price, a recognition that accelerated growth in earnings will
bring the stock price to new highs in the not too distant future.  One way
that earnings can grow beyond Wall Street expectations is by bringing a bit
more discipline to how all of us spend money at Enron.  We in Government
Affairs can point to many efforts and processes that have been designed to
instill that spending and resource allocation discipline in the last few
years.  We have always done our part, but there is always more that can be
done.

To increase earnings and, correspondingly, the stock price, I recently met
with various Government Affairs group heads to discuss ways Government
Affairs can do things better and more cost effectively.  We looked at group
travel costs, outside services, and other budget items.  Attached for your
review and use is a copy of a new Travel Policy and new Cell Phone Policy,
which I believe, will ensure consistency across the group and deliver cost
savings.  Such travel policies already exist in various regions such as Enron
Europe. (Regional Business Unit travel policies will continue to be applied,
where applicable)

Further, as a result of our review of the budget, we have identified savings
across the North American group in excess of 1.5 million dollars (USD).  This
is in addition to almost 2 million dollars (USD) by which the Enron Europe
Government Affairs budget has been reduced, as well as significant reductions
that have occurred in the South American group. Finally, I have also decided
to create a global government affairs hiring committee, which will evaluate
the need for any proposed hires (new and existing positions).  The purpose of
the committee will be to assess whether the need is valid and, assuming it
is, determine the most effective way to fill the position.  By encompassing a
cross-section of the Government Affairs group globally, it is my hope that we
will arrive at better hiring decisions.  The hiring committee will consist of
Aleck Dadson (Toronto), Sue Nord (Houston), Jim Steffes (Houston), Paul
Dawson (London), Doug Wood (London), Nick O,Day (Tokyo), Sergio Assad (Sao
Paulo), Linda Robertson (Washington) and myself.   The committee will meet on
an as needed basis.

I believe that these changes will allow us all the opportunity to provide
more cost effective and efficient service to the business units we support.
I encourage each of you to review the new policies and provide feedback.

Thank you


that is fine


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil43.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded43.pdf

Feb. WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clg-qog.pdf
Feb Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Feb Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
Feb/July Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLG-CLN.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG43.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG43.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL43.pdf

Scott Mollner Recommendation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/recom1-9-02.pdf

Daily Energy Letter
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Energy-Letter1-9-02.pdf


Phillip,

Below is the information for the CGAS book that was killed on 12/13/01.  This book should have liquidated in December.  Can we get this deal back?

Thanks,

Susie
x30524

							Totals	$7,714
			Monthly	PV	Discount	Mid	Fixed	Mid
Deal Num	Pub Code	Period	Quantity	Quantity	Factor	Price	Price	Value
ER6451.1	IF-CGT/APPALAC	01-Dec-01	-75,255	-75,255	100.00%	-0.119	0.313	$32,497
ER6451.2	IF-CGT/APPALAC	01-Dec-01	75,255	75,255	100.00%	-0.119	0.210	-$24,784


sorry i didn't call.  i was at work and i couldn't.  fri was a bad day.


Leslie-

We will cashout the imbalance with the two Koch entities in the following way:

We owe Koch 11,885 mmbtu at $3.90/mmbtu, which equals $46,351.50.
Koch owes us 13,639 mmbtu at $2.21/mmbtu and 11,720 mmbtu at $2.38/mmbtu,
which equals $58,035.79.
The net of these imbalances is $11,684.29 due to Enron.

Let me know if you have any questions.  I negotiated this with Scott Garrison
at Koch.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira


Reagan,

I don't suggest it, especially since this is not an "off the shelf" deal.
There are so many moving parts to this deal it could slow it down in the long
run to get someone else involved for a few days. It is like getting a new
commercial guy involved for 4 days. I'll defer to the great and powerful Oz.

I should be available most of the day, so let's see how things go.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 08:34 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Clarksdale

Kay,

Marvin is out of pocket right now.  If we do not hear from David Hunt this
morning, is there someone running backup for you?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 8:12 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: RE: Clarksdale

Federal jurisdiction and limit of liability verbage.  That's what comes to
mind at this point.

Could you email me the most current version (I think it was March 3)?

Thanks,

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 08:00 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Clarksdale

You were reading my mind.  What is the list of things he owes us?  David F.
and I will call Marvin to report on the status.

Thank you,

Reagan
713.345.3363
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 7:55 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Cc: Pagan, Ozzie; Fairley, David
Subject: Clarksdale

Reagan,

I haven't received an email from David Hunt yet.  I will make the changes you
and I discussed last week, and perhaps we will get David's changes sometime
today.

Kay


Shirley,

We plan to use it only for 30 minutes bet 11:00 and 11:30.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
04/18/2000 01:54 PM
To: Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Video Conference with Ross McIntyre

Nick:

We did get a conference room from 11:00 - 2:00, Houston time.  It is EB791.
I gave them the conference room you will be in, so I think everything is set
for the video.

Thanks!

Shirley


Rod,

Are you attending this meeting with Morris and Elaine or just yourself?

Thanks,

Kim
68301

Rod Hayslett

12/11/2000 04:21 PM
To: Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kim Pattison/OTS/Enron@Enron

Subject: Stan Horton Meeting; Subject: Citizen's Project in Arizona (O&M
Service Proposal)

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 12/11/2000
04:23 PM ---------------------------

Kim Pattison
12/11/2000 04:16 PM
To: Sarabeth Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Don Hawkins/OTS/Enron@Enron, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Stan Horton Meeting; Subject: Citizen's Project in Arizona (O&M
Service Proposal)

A meeting concerning the above subject is schedule for 2pm with Stan Horton
on Thursday, December 14th.  Please try to arrange your schedules to attend,
as Stan's schedule is not flexible.

Please confirm your attendance by email or voice mail to me by tomorrow, so I
can provide Cindy Stark with a headcount.

Thank you so much!

Kim Pattison
68301


Please let Linda know what is happening.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 12:13 PM -----

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Sharon Crawford
	10/17/2000 12:09 PM

		 To: Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Sanders/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Project Stanley - RC Number

Project Stanley is a unique, sensitive project that is being handled within a
limited circle within Houston and Calgary.  Nonetheless, the project is being
handled out of Houston and is incurring significant expenses, only some of
which are legal expenses.

A separate RC was requested to be set-up under the commercial direction of
John Lavorato and Rob Milnthorp.  The other principal contacts are from Legal
- Mark Haedicke, and Government Affairs - Rick Shapiro.  Frankly, I (as well
as Rob Milnthorp and Enron Canada generally) only have limited involvement in
this project.

Thanks,
Peter

Linda Sietzema
10/17/2000 09:45 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Project Stanley - RC Number

Peter,

Cheryl (from accounting) spoke to me this morning - she said that they are
having no luck with their contacts in Houston (Accounting) with respect to
setting up a Houston RC for Project Stanley - no one seems to know anything
about it.

Cheryl was wondering if we have a contact in Houston - Legal that she could
speak to about getting this set up with Houston - Accounting.

Let me know.

Thanks,
Linda


Marie and I were just looking at the activities list for the Legal Conference
and noticed you were signed up to "relax at the resort".  Not to get you
worked up or anything, but there is a huge outlet mall just outside San
Antonio, and there would be no shortage of cheap britches to be found!  After
all, it has been a few years since you cornered the market when you were
here, and you probably need to keep up with the latest fashions.  (Not to
belabor a dead horse, but again style watchers are telling us that the
fashion for Spring and Summer for men will be knee length "pedal pushers".)

We look forward to seeing our favorite Englishman (delete this message after
viewing, we don't want the other lads to get jealous!)


John:

	Have him log out of EnPower, log back in and try again.  I've got him set up in Blotter with East portfolio.  Let me know if this did not work.

Regards,
Bill x53492

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:22 PM
To:	Crooks, William
Subject:	RE: George Phillips

The Resolution desk has given me the password.   However,  George was not set up in deal blotter under North America,  East Region.   I have since submitted another E-request for George.   The reason is,   he cannot log onto blotter or create deals under his name.
Can you watch out for this?

JMF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crooks, William
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:08 PM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	George Phillips

John:

	The user ID was apparently set to GPHILLIP  The password should be the same.  If that does not work, please let me know.

Regards,
Bill x53492


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread41.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread41.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread41.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack41.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack41.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Norma,

Thanks for your help.

My phone numbers are 713 410 5396 (cell, always on)  or 281 367 5377 (home).

Vince


Dan,

Sorry to keep bothering you, but does what we talked about earlier pertain to
EOL trades as well given the language in those contracts, i.e. requiring
outside parties to honor contracts if they claim "force majeure"?

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/14/2001 08:47 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	05/14/2001 08:47 PM

		 To: sryan@aesc.com, hoffman@blackstone.com, bbailey@duke-energy.com,
Lynn.A.Lednicky@Dynegy.com, john.harrison@elpaso.com,
rachael.king@elpaso.com, clark.smith@elpaso.com, skean@enron.com,
tom.allen@mirant.com, sonnet.edmonds@mirant.com, randy.harrison@mirant.com,
alex.goldberg@williams.com
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Summary of Today's Call/Agenda for Tomorrow's Call

Greetings:
In order to keep everyone in the loop, the folks on today's call wanted to
send out a brief summary of the call for the benefit of those who couldn't
make it.  Apologies for any omissions, inaccuracies, etc.  Others who were on
the call please chime in if I've gotten anything wrong, or missed anything.

Best,
Jeff

SUMMARY
Enron, Duke, El Paso and Williams were on the call, as was Michael Hoffman of
the Blackstone Group (the Governor's financial advisors).
On the subject of how the group would organize itself, it was agreed that the
calls would be open to anyone who wanted to participate.
A smaller group consisting of Duke, El Paso, Enron, and Williams would take
the lead on walking the halls of Sacramento, meeting with policy makers, and
advocating whatever plan the group develops.
Folks agreed that achieving a comprehesive solution requires a tangible
process; that is, the principals need to get in a room, face to face, for
however long it takes to work out a resolution.
It was agreed that the process should start no later than the beginning of
next week, and that it should take place in Sacramento.
It was decided that the Legislature and the Attorney General needed to be
brought into the process as soon as possible, i.e., next week.
There was some discussion regarding the release today of "Plan B."  Plan B is
a plan proposed by Democratic and Republican legislators as an alternative to
the MOU that the Governor struck with Edison.  After that call I received a
copy of "Plan B."  If you'd like a copy please send me your fax number.
Folks on the call agreed to have the next "supplier-only" call-in meeting on
Friday.
Finally, Michael Hoffman said that they are hoping to have a "ratings agency
level" presentation prepared by the end of the week.  The goal of the
presentation is to reassure capital markets that the bonds the state seeks to
issue are solidly backed by retail rates.

The Agenda for Tomorrow's Call with the Governor's Staff
Item #1:  The Credit Issue
Michael Hoffman said that the Governor's office wants to start tomorrow's
meeting discussing the creditworthiness issue.
Hoffman said that the Governor's folks are hoping to have completed by the
start of tomorrow's meeting a draft of an agreement between the California
PUC and CDWR.  The agreement is designed to ensure that DWR gets paid for
power services delivered.
If the draft is ready, they'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow.

Item #2:  Identify the Components of a Comprehensive Solution.
It was agreed that our group should put on the table at tomorrow's meeting
the universe of issues that need to be included in a comprehensive solution.
Enron was asked to take a first stab at what those components are.  The
following is a brief outline, which is not intended to be definitive, but a
starting point for discussion.
Utility creditworthiness
retail rates must reflect costs
Increase supply
streamline and otherwise reform the siting process
Decrease demand
establish real-time pricing
implement demand buy-down and other conservation programs
Create a real market
Remove the State from the power-buying business as soon as possible (e.g.,
once new rates are in place and utilities are returned to creditworthiness;
approximately 3-6 months)
Return the procurement role to the utilities
Reinstate Direct Access immediately for all customers
Within 18-24 months, create a "core/noncore" market structure for
electricity, similar to California's market structure for natural gas
Keep the industry in the hands of the private sector
Reject proposals calling on the State to take over transmission, generation,
etc.
Resolve outstanding legal claims, investigations, etc.
Resolution requires certainty and prompt payment (understanding that
discounts on receivables is on the table for discussion)


pay only the $1750 referenced below to Robin Barbie from my book.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 12:12 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Robin Barbe                           02/08/2001 11:15 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: orgination

as i discussed today listed below is the trade that i would like orgination
granted on and a summary of the other
deal i spoke with you about.

bought 5000 dracut from hydroquebec sitara deal number 610884  purchase price
$6.10
sold      5000 dracut from conn nat           sitara deal number 610959
sell price            $6.45

orgination  $1750

additionally on a daily basis i attempt  to market  the tenn zone 5 above the
cng bid.
usually with success.
the production costs roughly 28 cents at current prices to move to cng.
today the cng two way  was 6.51 by 6.55.  i sold 5800  at $6.48 which is a
$6.76 cng equivalent or
.25 over the cng bid   or $1450

i can't try to forward sell this gas because we don't know on a forward basis
if we are going to have this gas.
i assume that this position would go into the cng position when the books are
broken out and i can't imagine that
scott will have the time try to market it.  thus if i am spending a
considerable amount of time in the morning trying to add
value to the desk with the illiquid assets that we have and i am successful,
then i feel that signficant quantifiable contributions
made to the desk should be recognized.


Okay - I can forward the contract along on Monday when Chris Foster gets
back. Also, I think I'd like Chris and his contact at Sierra to talk over the
issue of whether we'll amend the contract to include "Inc." or whether we'll
amend the counterparty name in EnPower. I've left a message for Chris
regarding this question, and hopefully we'll touch base sometime today. I
will let you know as soon as I hear back. (And feel free to nab him for a
moment if you see him in the office!)

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
04/12/2001 09:03 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: New CTPY Request

When the contract is fully executed, just forward it to me in interoffice
mail.  I do have questions about the name that the contract has been written
under and the name that the deals are under in Enpower.  Sierra Pacific
Industries, Inc. is in global counterparty and the deals have been changed in
Enpower to this CP.  The problem is that the contract and the confirms will
not agree as to who is the correct CP.  We have always confirmed deals under
the name of the entity with whom we have a contract.  Please let me know if
the name will be changed on the contract to reflect the correct CP or will we
amend the contract to add "Inc." to the end of the name and set up this dba
in global counterparty.  I need to know before we can confirm these deals.

In additiona, Geir has entered a transmission deal for this CP.  578812.
Should this be a buy/resale?

   Kate Symes                04/12/2001 10:35 AM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New CTPY Request

I sent a copy of the agreement to Melissa Murphy via fax. I'll need to get
ahold of Chris Foster, who is in your Houston office at the moment, to locate
the original. He won't be back in the Portland office until Monday morning.
When would you like the original by? Just let me know - we'll get it to you
as soon as we can.

Thanks,
Kate
503-464-7486

Rhonda L Denton
04/12/2001 07:22 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: New CTPY Request

Can I get the original of this contract?

   Kate Symes                04/09/2001 03:09 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New CTPY Request

I just heard from Samuel (thanks for your message!) that I need to send
Rhonda new counterparty information in order to get their names added to the
system. I called Rhonda, but it turns out she's out of the office for the
first part of this week, and her voice mail referred me to Melissa. (That's a
short explanation of why I'm sending this info. to all of you.)

Anyway, following is the information connected with the new counterparty name
Chris Foster has requested:

Name: Sierra Pacific Holding Company, dba Sierra Pacific Industries
Address: PO Box 496028
    Redding, CA 96049
Or: 19759 Riverside Ave.
      Anderson, CA 96007
Phone: (530) 378-8179
Fax: (530) 378-8139
Contact: Director of Energy Resources - Robert Ellery

I also have a copy of the Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement if you'd
like me to fax that over. Just let me know how I can help. We've already
entered Chris's deal into the system with "New Counterparty," so the sooner
we can change that the better.

Thanks,
Kate


Meet the head of
the leading firm
in our business

Imagine the opportunity!
 Imagine that the leading energy company in the world has picked you to run
the
company that it expects to be the leading retail energy company in North
America.

 So you get a sharp competitive edge in the back room, you recruit IBM as a
co-owner
assuring you the lowest cost per customer by a factor of two or three.
To get your foot in 27 million doors you recruit AOL as a co-venturer with a
commitment from AOL to promote NewPower,s wares.
You do an IPO and take in about $700 million for working capital.  The IPO is
over and the quiet period it required.
But the most important silver spoon -- so that you get your energy at the best
price and to protect you against price spikes -- you get up front 30
Enron-trained
risk managers and traders.  Can you imagine having to recruit them?

To make sure this team is run by the optimum chief they picked Eugene
Lockhart,
most recently president of Consumer Services at AT&T and before that president
of BankAmerica,s Global Retail Bank with its consumer, commercial and small
business
banking services delivered through 3,000+ branches.
 Now, Lockhart's talking about his plans.
      Restructuring Today had lunch with Lockhart Thursday and reported in
detail:

 *  How NewPower intends to actually start up the retail industry?  What is
the
heart of NewPower,s business plan?
 *  How they'll make money in markets where margins may seem too thin.
 *  How he,s going to have 600,000+ customers next month and easily a million
by the end of 2001.
 *  What percentage of their sales come from the NewPower website.  What
figure
is he using for cost of customer acquisition?
 *  Lockhart plans to have by the end of the first quarter or at the latest
the
second quarter 750,000 customers making them by far the largest unregulated
retail
marketer in the US.
 *  How does he think utilities will compete with the NewPower paradigm?
 *  What marketshare do they expect to get at first and then by 2005?
 *  What does he see as his biggest challenge?
 *  Why is this a good time for NewPower to invade California markets?
 *  Why will NewPower succeed where Enron failed?
 *  What,s the role of backward dating in forward market margins?
 *  Where NewPower gives a 20-25% discount on the commodity portion of a bill,
what kind of margin can it make now?
 *  How do higher prices help NewPower?  "We,re actually in a very good
position
given (that) the gas cost increases perversely will work in our favor ... "
 *  "We have a 10-year, exclusive agreement with IBM whereby we can issue a
bill,
collect the money and care for a customer at lower cost than anyone else in
the
industry by several orders of magnitude."

We,d love to send you the two-story, detailed report on how the leading
company
in our industry is going to get there and stay there.

Reply to daily@restructuringtoday.com and I'll rush you the two articles or
call
1-800-486-8201.

Subscribe today!  Restructuring Today is the nations leading daily focused on
the convergence of electricity, natural gas, telecom and dot-com --
chronicling
the creation of America's largest industry.  If you fax the completed attached
order form to 1-202-298-8201, I'll make sure you don't miss a single vital
issue.

Cordially,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
daily@restructuringtoday.com
 - orderform.pdf


Hello

Shan Millie <shan@risk.co.uk> on 03/24/2000 05:39:55 AM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject:

This is to let you know that I am leaving Risk Books today. I want to thank
you for being such a good friend to us - right the way back to MEPR1 - and
to give you my home email so that you have me on file should you want some
publishing input in the future.

shan@pmillie.freeserve.co.uk

Hoping all goes well with you.

Sh?n
Sh?n Millie
Risk Books
28-29 Haymarket
London SW1Y 4RX
tel: +44 (0)171 484 9740
fax: +44 (0)171 484 9758
e-mail: shan@risk.co.uk
www.riskpublications.com


Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 2/16/00.

Regards,
Molly


Daren,

I believe the best way to enter the fee into Sitara would be as a Demand fee
in your example #1.
If we do the fee this way, we will not  double up the volumes.

I have attached my spreadsheet for support:
THE MOST CURRENT WORKSHEET IS TAB #2 MARKED FINAL

Column G is the Over-Delivery quantity total is 17,278 mmbtus
Column S is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due HPLC
$1,008.87
Column T is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due the
customer $519.73.

Thanks-
Katherine
5-8643

Daren J Farmer@ECT
08/31/2000 05:49 PM
To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

Katherine,

There are 2 ways that I can enter this fee into Sitara:
1) I can put the dollar amount in on day 1 as a demand or facility fee.

2) I need you to give me volume(s) and a price to input into the deal.  I
can't just input a dollar amount in Sitara.

Let me know how you want to handle it.

D

Katherine Herrera@ENRON
08/31/2000 05:28 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

CASHOUT
Please add the following fees for Feb. 2000:

FEE TYPE:
Natural Gas
Physical Forward
Penalty for Over/ Under take

Sales Ticket # 157278
$1,008.87 Dollars Due HPLC

Purchase Ticket # 157288
$519.73 Dollars Due Duke

Thanks- Katherine


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

 - 11-20 1600 Report.xls


We have four tickets available for that game.  I will reserve those for
you immediately.  Let me know if your plans change or if I can help plan
anything for you (hotel, etc.)  We can finalize plans as the date gets
closer.  Later...

-----Original Message-----
From: Tori.Kuykendall@enron.com [mailto:Tori.Kuykendall@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 3:43 PM
To: mwomack@tristargas.com
Subject: Re: FW: DallasStars

hey - looks like feb 23 would be my preference if thats available.
thanks
so much .


We are pleased to announce the creation of a new group - Asset Marketing -
within Enron Americas. The Asset Marketing group will have responsibility for
the asset divestment function within Enron Americas and work with Generation
Investments on selected portfolio acquisitions as well as managing power
origination funding requirements with Treasury.

Don Miller will head the Asset Marketing group and will report directly to
the Office of the Chair, Enron Americas. Joining Don's group will be Stuart
Zisman.  Stuart was formerly in ENA Legal, having most recently worked on the
sale of ENA's peaker plants with Don.

Please join us in congratulating Don and Stuart in their new roles.


fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 07:25 AM -----

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	11/29/2000 04:03 AM

		 To: Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron merger talks

Just in case you had not seen this.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 29/11/2000
10:05 ---------------------------

Kyran Hanks
29/11/2000 09:09
To: Alfredo Huertas/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron merger talks

A

Something that you have not been telling us?

K.


the latest from CSFB - Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 03:37 PM -----

	"Chiodi, Maria" <maria.chiodi@csfb.com>
	12/20/2000 07:20 PM

		 To: "'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Skinner, Mark" <mark.skinner@csfb.com>, "Haratunian, Stephen"
<stephen.haratunian@csfb.com>
		 Subject: Equity Forward Confirmation

Sara:

As we discussed this evening, I attach a revised draft based on our
discussions and, aside from the jurisdiction issue, have highlighted what I
think are the open issues in brackets.  I apologize in advance if I left
anything out and look forward to discussing this further with you tomorrow
morning.

Regards,

Maria Chiodi

 <<Fwd001220Trade1Dec 20 Draft.doc>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - Fwd001220Trade1Dec 20 Draft.doc


The game is at 8:45 on Monday@ the Post Oak YMCA.

Let me know if you can make it.


** Proprietary **

Louie:  Not particularly surprising.  There remains the concern that the
Nation has  not waived its immunity from suit even in tribal court.  I wonder
if they would discuss that (they have refused in the recent past).  If they
don't, that would leave us with:  (1) the Department of the Interior, with
respect to certain disputes arising under the ROW agreement--particularly on
issues of cancellation; and (2) an "ex Parte Young" action in federal court
for injunction against tribal officials seeking to enjoin acts in excess of
tribal power under federal law--with the possible result that the federal
court requires us to exhaust tribal court remedies before it hears the
issues.  This would help only in egregious circumstances or when the Nation
exceeds its jurisdictional power.  If TW agrees to the standard terms and
conditions, it will be tough to show the Nation is exceeding its powers,
since they require consent to broad tribal powers.

Please raise any questions.  Lynn

>>> <Louis.Soldano@enron.com> 07/26/00 06:37AM >>>
Larry Ruzow met with the Navajo DOJ (a Jim Fitting, Esq. ) yesterday
afternoon on another matter.  In the course of the meeting,
Mr. Fitting made clear that the DOJ will oppose any deal that calls for
disputes to be adjudicated in any
forum other than the Navajo Nation Courts (and that this meant DOJ
opposition to arbitration as well.)

Larry expressed that we should not expect Ms. Tapahe (who is more militant
on sovereignty-related
issues) to be willing to compromise on forum issues.

He did remind me of the Resources Committee process.

At this point we will attempt a meeting regardless and report back on
progress.


PLEASE NOTE SPECIAL HOURS

Notice No. 01-349
October 22, 2001

TO:       All NYMEX Members/Member Firms
          All NYMEX Clearing Members
          All NYMEX Floor Traders
          All NYMEX Operations Managers

FROM:     George Henderson, Vice President

RE:       Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the Trading
Floor and Clearing Members - Revised Hours
________________________________________________________________

The expiration date for the November 2001 options contract for Unleaded
Gasoline (GOX1), Heating Oil (OHX1) and Natural Gas (ONX1) is Friday,
October 26, 2001.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized
representative present at their normal work station promptly at 4:40 p.m.
until released by the Exchange staff as specified below.  All adjustments
and/or corrections, must be accompanied by relevant supporting
documentation
prior to being incorporated into expiration processing, in essence making
the expiration processing an extension of the afternoon trade resolution
procedures.  All input to the NYMEX Clearing Department will conclude no
later than 30 minutes after floor representatives are released.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110), Floor Trade Processing (299-2068 and
299-2169)
personnel, as well as a representative of the Floor Committee will be
available to assist with the processing of notices of Exercise and
Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other questions or
problems you may have.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The Option Expiration process is a screen based process for which all
information is provided on the screens on C21 terminals. No Option
Expiration Reports will be provided. The following screens will assist you
through the Option Expiration process:

MEMBER TRADE INQUIRY
Contains real-time top day trade information, trade information for the
previous 4 business days and trade=s adjusted for the previous 4 business
days by adjustment date.

SINGLE POSITION MAINTENANCE
Contains a real-time snapshot for each option series from the start of day
position to the projected end of day position.

REVIEW ACCEPT REJECT TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfers TO your firm and the status of
each transfer.

REVIEW SUBMITTED TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfer FROM your firm and the status of
each transfer.

EXERCISE NOTICE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the
number
of long positions you wish to exercise.

DO NOT EXERCISE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the
number
of long positions you wish to abandon.

POSITION CHANGE SUBMISSION
PCS may be submitted either by manual input or by electronic transmission.
Any PCS input on a Clearing 21 terminal will be the input processed by the
system.  This input may be made at any time prior to 5:55 p.m.  Any PCS
input via transmission for that contract series will be disregarded.

ALL POSITIONS ARE DEEMED FINAL
Upon completion of all PCS input, all positions will be deemed final.

EXERCISE/ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Will be available to you on the Single Position Maintenance window by
contract series or the Assignment List window which contains all your
Assignments on one window. You will be notified of its availability by C21
E-Mail and by Fast Facts. This should occur within 1 hour of the last PCS
input.

All Clearing Members are required to have an authorized representative(s)
at
their C21 workstations in preparation for any communication during the
expiration process.

FAST FACTS
Clearing Members should call the Fast Facts information service 301-4871,
access code 700 for event messages advising Members of the event status.

E-MAIL
Clearing Members should read their C21 E-Mail messages immediately to be
aware of event status.

The standard event Fast Facts and/or E-Mail messages and the sequence in
which they will be announced are:

STANDARD EVENT           APPROXIMATE TIME            USUAL   FAST
FACTS(F)
  MESSAGES                       OF MESSAGE        EVENT TIME
E-MAIL    (E)
                           AVAILABILITY
BOTH      (B)

Announce Out-of-the                 4:45PM          4:45PM        F
Money Exercise and In-the-Money
Do Not Exercise Submissions

Announce Final Input to C21         5:40PM          5:55PM        E
Cutoff Time

All positions are deemed final      6:30PM          5:55PM        F

Announce Exercise/Assignment        7:15PM          7:15PM        B
Information Available on the Single
Position Maintenance Windows

All Report Distribution is         11:30PM         11:30PM        F
completed

The times appearing in the Usual Event Time column are based on normal
operational conditions and could vary.

If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact
Anthony Di Benedetto at 299-2152 or John Ramos at 299-2142 prior to the
expiration date.

 <<EXPFORMSPEC.XLS>>

(See attached file: EXPFORMSPEC.XLS)

 - EXPFORMSPEC.XLS


If you are looking to feed and challenge your faith, visit
Crosswalk.com's Spiritual Life Channel at:
http://spiritual.crosswalk.com
-----------
N E I L   A N D E R S O N   D A I L Y   D E V O T I O N A L
             from Freedom in Christ Ministries

October 27

FORGIVING YOUR PAST

Be kind to one another, tender-hearted, forgiving each other,
just as God in Christ also has forgiven you (Ephesians 4:32).

The second step in resolving past conflicts is to forgive those
who have offended you. After encouraging Cindy, a rape victim, to
deal with the emotional trauma of her rape, I said, "Cindy, you
also need to forgive the man who raped you." Cindy's response was
typical of many believers who have suffered physical, sexual or
emotional pain at the hands of others: "Why should I forgive him?
You don't know how badly he hurt me!"

"He's still hurting you, Cindy," I responded. "Forgiveness is how
you stop the pain. You don't forgive him for his sake; you do it
for your sake."

Why should you forgive those who have hurt you in the past?

First, forgiveness is required by God. As soon as Jesus spoke the
amen to His model prayer--which included a petition for God's
forgiveness--He commented: "If you forgive men for their
transgressions, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But
if you do not forgive men, then your Father will not forgive your
transgressions" (Matthew 6:14, 15). We must base our
relationships with others on the same criteria on which God bases
His relationship with us: love, acceptance and forgiveness
(Matthew 18:21-35).

Second, forgiveness is necessary to avoid entrapment by Satan. I
have discovered from my counseling that unforgiveness is the
number one avenue Satan uses to gain entrance to believers'
lives. Paul encouraged mutual forgiveness "in order that no
advantage be taken of us by Satan; for we are not ignorant of his
schemes" (2 Corinthians 2:11). Unforgiveness is an open
invitation to Satan's bondage in our lives.

Third, we are to forgive like Christ forgave in order to keep our
hearts from bitterness. Paul wrote: "Let all bitterness and wrath
and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with
all malice. And be kind to one another, tender-hearted, forgiving
each other, just as God in Christ also has forgiven you"
(Ephesians 4:31, 32).

Your act of forgiveness will set the captive free, then you will
realize that the captive was you!

Lord, teach me to forgive others from my heart as You have
forgiven me.

-----------
This daily devotional is published and distributed by
Crosswalk.com.  It is written by Neil Anderson at
< http://www.ficm.org >.

You can purchase "Daily in Christ" and other titles by Neil Anderson at
christianbook.com (Christian Book Distributors - CBD).
< http://shopping.crosswalk.com/bye/devo_na >

Additional devotionals are available from Crosswalk.com:
< http://devotionals.crosswalk.com >.
-----------
To read the Current Feature Story from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentFeatureStory/

For today's complete News Summary from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentNewsSummary/

-----------
For Copyright Terms go to http://www.crosswalk.com/info/copyright

____________________SUBSCRIPTION INFO_______________________

* You subscribed to Neil Anderson as:
         < jeff.king@enron.com >
* To unsubscribe from this newsletter immediately, click here:
         < http://link.crosswalk.com/UM/U.ASP?A3.14.261895 >
  If that link is not clickable, simply copy and paste it into
  your browser window.
* To change your address:  unsubscribe your old address
  and then subscribe your new address.
* To subscribe, send an email to:
  < SUBSCRIBE-neilanderson@lists.crosswalk.com > or go to
  < http://www.crosswalk.com/lists > for a complete list of
  our newsletters.
* Copyright ? 2001 Crosswalk.com, Inc. and its Content
  Providers. All rights reserved.

____________________________________________________________


FYI...

Energy Cos Limit Business With Enron After 10Q -Traders
By Mark Golden

11/20/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Many energy trading companies were unwilling to sell
power and natural gas for next day delivery to Enron Corp. (ENE) Tuesday
morning, a result of heightened credit concerns following the release of
Enron's quarterly financial report Monday, traders and other sources said.

  For weeks, companies have limited both buying and selling with Enron for
future deliveries. But for the first time since Enron's troubles began a month
ago, energy companies weren't selling to Enron in the spot markets for fear
that Enron might not be able to pay its bills as soon as next month.
  "It's pretty well accepted in the industry that people are staying away for
now," said Charlie Sanchez, energy market manager for Gelber & Associates in
Houston.

  Traders at all of the major companies contacted said they couldn't sell to
Enron Tuesday morning. Several spokespeople for energy companies confirmed the
situation, but declined to say so on the record.

  "Nobody will take Enron," one western electricity broker said. After
struggling, however, that broker eventually found a utility that was willing
to sell to Enron Tuesday morning.

  Calpine, a prominent independent power producer and trader, said it was
willing to sell power to Enron.

  "We continue to sell power to Enron and are monitoring the situation
closely," spokeswoman Catherine Potter said.

  The situation Tuesday morning was fluid. One utility that refused to sell to
Enron in the morning was willing to do so in the afternoon, a person at the
company said. That company's trading, however, was still limited to the spot
markets.

  Credit concerns about the once-dominant energy trading company were
heightened with Enron's filing of its third quarter annual report Monday
evening with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission.

  Enron may have to pay $690 million on a note that became a demand obligation
with the company's most recent credit-rating downgrade, Enron said in Monday's
filing. The company also warned that its profits in the fourth quarter could
be hurt by credit concerns, a decline in asset values and reduced trading
activity.

  "The 10Q in and by itself is a document that could raise concerns," Fitch
analyst Ralph Pellecchia said. "We have a lot of questions outstanding
relative to disclosures that were new to us and their strategies of how they
are going to manage the situation."

  Companies are willing to buy from Enron in the spot gas and power markets,
because taking delivery on commodity and paying for it a month later poses no
credit risk for the buyer.


Dear Traders,

I still have not heard responses from some of you who have been on shift
since I sent the e-mail about MPC cleanup.  We need to check out soon!
There are too many disputes to pull tapes for, so please help me find the
answers.

Thanks,

VA


As many of you know, yesterday we closed on Dynegy's option to acquire Northern Natural.  Shortly, a more comprehensive message will be distributed about that transaction and what it means for all of us.

One important requirement under that transaction is that Enron Operations Services Company has agreed to continue providing certain services to Northern consistent with our past operations.  Northern will be billed for those services, and we will be required to demonstrate the basis for those billings.

Effective, Feb. 1, all employees in the ETS family of companies that perform any services for Northern or related to Northern's operations in any way should keep timesheets documenting the amount of time spent on Northern projects or supporting personnel and activities related to Northern projects.

If there are any questions about this requirement, please communicate with your department head or with me.  Thanks for your help in implementing this important requirement.

Jim


Please disregard my first note. Chris Foster will call tonight and tell you what to do with ARCO's schedule.

---------------------- Forwarded by Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT on 04/04/2001 04:54 PM ---------------------------

Monika Causholli
04/04/2001 01:26 PM
To:	Portland Shift
cc:

Subject:	Tuesday/Wed Buyback

---------------------- Forwarded by Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT on 04/04/2001 01:34 PM ---------------------------

	  From:  Chris H Foster                           04/04/2001 10:43 AM

To:	izarrai@bp.com
cc:	Kourtney Nelson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject:	Tuesday/Wed Buyback

Alicia:

For today you had pre-scheduled 29 MW for all hours and had a unit outage that started around 8:00 (I think).  For HE 12 - 24 you purchased 25 MW from us at $220.  For HE 13 - 24 you purchased 3 MW at $225.  Your schedule will therefore reflect 29MW through HE 11, 4 MW for HE 12 and 1 MW for HE 13-24.  Deviation quantities and ISO purchases will be based on that schedule.

For Wed your  pre-schedule reflects 18 MW On Peak and 21 Off Peak.  Prices for tomorrow were

Peak - $215
Off Peak - $110

We will work to buy this back as well.  We will not pre-schedule anything tomorrow morning for Friday and Saturday unless you give us the go ahead.

Prices for tomorrow

C


p	42
o	16

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wong, Michael F
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 12:08 PM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	tomorrow's mark

when you get a chance please.
MW


Hello everyone.  More fun issues from Chicago.  I would like to discuss the
different options available for giving parent guarantees to third parties.
As everyone knows, to date we have had two third party transactions requiring
parent guarantees.  In the Trunkline transaction, each parent issued separate
guarantees for 1/2 of the requested amount, negotiated by respective
counsel.  In the Alliance transaction, Enron issued a guarantee for the
entire amount and Peoples has presented us with a reimbursement agreement
which we are reviewing.  Peoples' Board meets next Wednesday, Oct. 4, to
approve the risk management policy.  Assuming the policy is approved, deal
flow should begin to increase and I would like to discuss how these
guarantees can best be handled going forward.  My thought was an hour or so
next Monday, Oct. 2, to the extent everyone is available, with a follow up
meeting with Peoples perhaps Wednesday.  Let me know how your calendar looks
and I will coordinate the meeting.

Jeff & Kay:  Although this has been initially focused on parent guarantees,
this is part of a larger issue regarding negotiations of enovate contracts in
general.  For instance, we have agreed to templates for a Master Purchase and
Sale Agreement and a GISB Agreement.  However, who is authorized to make
changes and negotiate on behalf of enovate?  We can discuss any suggestions
for handling these situations as well.

Thanks,

Gregg


Please make sure that nothing goes out internally or externally without the
approval of Cliff Baxter or Mark Metts.  We need to continue our usual
vetting process through both PR and IR, but need also to add Cliff and Mark.
In getting the OK from Cliff and Mark we must have no OKs by default -- ie
because we haven't received comments or a response on time.  If anybody needs
help getting to Cliff or Mark, then Mark Palmer, Karen Denne, or I can help.

Thanks
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 10:05 AM -----

	John Ambler@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	10/13/2000 04:39 PM

		 To: Jimmy Mogal/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer@ENRON, Johan
Zaayman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: EGEP Sale Announcement

Jimmy,

I'll be working up a limited statement and Q&As, which we will need to run by
Jeff Sherrick and Mark Metts.  Once we have an approved statement I'll let
you know.  Of course, we would prefer to avoid publicity if possible.  Until
we have an approved statement, please call me to discuss if you have pressing
demands.

Thanks,

John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/13/2000 04:26 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey Sherrick@ENRON
10/13/2000 03:04 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jimmy
Mogal/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Stephen Wallace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike
Stewart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: EGEP Sale Announcement

On Friday (last night Houston time) we announced Enron's decision to sell
Enron Oil & Gas India Ltd. (EOGIL), our subsidary that owns a 30% interest in
the Panna, Mukta and Tapti concession areas.    We now have bankers involved
and a data room is being prepared in Houston which  made it extremely
difficult to keep the deal quiet any longer.  There were a rumors circulating
through the office, but the reality of the announcement was still a shock to
most of the employees in India and Houston.  Attached is a memo we handed out
to employees, but basically we said the following:
 1) Selling assets or companies is a routine part of Enron's strategy to
redeploy capital in the higher return opportunities.  The company has
exposure to a number of tremendous opportunities today that were not
envisioned even twelve months ago.  In line with this strategy, we are
placing EOGIL in the market.
 2) Depending on the success of finding an acceptable buyer for EOGIL,  we
will be reviewing the balance of our portfolio for transfer to other Enron
entities or for sale as separate packages.  We anticipate closing the EOGIL
transaction and rationalizing the remaining portfolio by March 31, 2001.
 3) Pending the success outlined in item #2, we will eliminate Enron Global
E&P as an Enron business unit on March 31, 2001.
 4) We announced some interim staff changes to facilitate the process.
  a) Jeff Sherrick would re-focus his time largely on the sale process
  b) Mike Stewart will be responsible for all India activity except the sale
process
  c) Steve Harper will be responsible for EGEP's sale activity and
coordination with our bankers and Corporate Development
 5) Commented on the potential impact to employees in general terms.  We told
them it was pre-mature to outline all of the possibilities until we signed a
PSA with a buyer.  However, in general, there is a good likelihood that many
people will either have opportunities for future employment with the buyers
or through redeployment within Enron.  Those people that do not remain with
the assets or are not redeployed in Enron will be involuntarily terminated
March 31, 2001 unless they are needed to close a transaction or to provide
transition services to a buyer.

I would like to keep this as low-keyed as possible.  Last year when we were
for sale there were not a lot of comments, but you never know.  If anyone in
the media picks up on this I would expect it to happen early next week.  Mike
Stewart is currently in India in the Mumbai office (01191228395841) and can
be reached at the Mariott after-hours(01191228577878).  He is fully briefed
on our position regarding the activities within EGEP and EOGIL.  Mike will be
traveling offshore and to Baroda over the weekend and on Monday.  I will be
available all weekend and next week at the following numbers; (work)
713-853-5934, (home) 281-320-2198, (cell) 713-569-4713.  I would suggest
talking with Mike or I before making any comments to the media if possible.

This afternoon I notified our partners and thr Gov't of India of our
intention to market our assets.  I will be making a trip to India soon to
visit with the appropriate people in these organizations within the next two
weeks.  While I wouldn't expect this to happen, please refer any inquiries
from our partners (ONGC and Reliance) or the GOI to Mike or me.  As you might
expect, we want to be careful and consistent in our message to these
groups.

I will keep you informed regarding any changes to the above.  If you have any
questions, contact me at the above numbers.

jeff


Ken,  sorry  I was unable to attend the fishing tournament,  but I have been
out  with the flu.  I look forward to the next event.

Your attachment for the list of events did not come with the e-mail.   Please
send again.

Thanks!
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


we have some behind the citygate productin from that is paid in mcf's not
mmbtu's.  I am not entering these in the system because i don't know how it
will work.  any suggestions?


I tried.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
12/14/98 09:19 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "P J Knop" <knop@knop.org>                           12/12/98 09:59 AM

To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Christmas Trees and cats

I have had cats all my life and NEVER had this problem!!
    Will think on it as no immediate solution - perhaps some sort of net
tied under the lowest branches....but if she is clever she will probably try
to jump onto it at its outside edges...
             AT least there is one other member of the family who definitely
is having a merry Christmas!
       From all of us at Ticonderoga Farms.
-----Original Message-----
From: mtaylo1@ect.enron.com <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com>
To: farm@ticonderoga.com <farm@ticonderoga.com>
Date: Friday, December 11, 1998 6:56 PM
Subject: Christmas Trees and cats

>Any suggestions on how to discourage the cat from climbing up inside the
>Christmas tree?  Of course, we put the wooden and plastic ornaments on
>the lower branches so they won't be damaged when the cat plays with them
>but when she climbs up inside the tree the upper branches wave about and
>I'm afraid the glass ornaments up there will be shaken off.
>
>


Dear Ken,

At a prayer meeting this morning I prayed for you, the Company, and all those affected by the circumstances you face.

I know that you are doing all that you can to help the Company and its people survive.

The way we face great difficulty is the measure of our lives.  You have not run.  God will give you the strength to get thru this.

I know that Enron is not just a business for you, it is a dream .. a dream you have seen almost fulfilled.  I believe 'others' were sent to you to do harm .. and that they corrupted your dream.  It's a story as old as life itself.

Ask God for His wisdom, His help, Hisbenediction.

You are not alone Ken.

God bless and keep you and your family safe.

John


Here is an updated list of all brokers, and which one of us handles the
specific broker.

Patrick    53877
Kristine   53126


Privileged and Confidential Joint Defense Communication

From:  Don Schultz
To:      Grynberg  Defendants
Re:     Extension of time for discovery letter

Judge Downes' law clerk called to report that Judge Downes did not intend to
impose such scheduling duress on the Grynberg and Wright groups seeking to
coordinate on a discovery letter, so is granting us until the close of
business on Thursday to submit a coordinated letter reply.   A draft reply is
in process and should be circulated early tomorrow with requests for your
prompt feedback.   Don.


Gee, with all due respect, this sounds like SoCal trying to justify its
windowing policy.

Have you considered a career as a PR exec with OPEC.

Affectionately yours,
Jeff

	Jeffery Fawcett
	09/26/2000 09:57 AM

		 To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Environmental Alert called off

Consider the facts:

- 80% of the materials in this vehicle's construction are recyclable.
- Although it weighs 7,200 lbs, it gets 14 mpg, city, 18 mpg, highway, better
than most 6-cylinder SUV's.
- It's the only SUV that has a "blocker beam," a sort of low-slung bumper
behind the front bumper designed to transfer the energy of an impact with a
small car directly onto the small car's rear bumper, mitigating the risk of
the Excursion riding up and over the smaller car.  In addition, the standard
class V hitch is set low on the rear frame and, similar to the blocker beam
up front, is designed to absorb the energy of a rear crash.
- It is a high efficiency, smokeless turbo-charged diesel engine... although
diesels produce more particulates than gasoline engines, overall, they don't
produce nearly the pollution of a gas-fired engine.  See below:

Diesel engine
In general terms the diesel engine is less polluting that the petrol engine,
it produces 25 times less carbon monoxide, 15 times less hydrocarbons without
burning and half as much nitrogen oxide, whereas the emissions of sulphur
dioxide are higher.

Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that when the load of the diesel
engine approaches the maximum, the formation of soot increases radically
(which may even go so far as to multiply the concentration of black lead by
20).

This phenomenon does not occur with petrol vehicles, in which the
concentration of particles in the exhaust gases is kept practically constant.
In order to prevent this, we can recycle part of the exhaust gases through
the air inlet and place filters in the exhaust in order to reduce the
emission of particles.
Comparative chart for the components of the exhaust
from a petrol engine and a diesel engine

Susan Scott
09/25/2000 05:05 PM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Environmental Alert

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 09/25/2000
05:05 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 09/25/2000 05:03 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Environmental Alert

Oh great, he gets married, but his kids die from pollution.


The EnPower database will be down from 4 PM Friday afternoon (6 PM Houston) to 4 PM Saturday afternoon (6PM Houston).  The reason for this is the NETCO/Estate database and hardware split that is occuring this weekend.

You must re-boot your machines following this shut down to access any EnPower applications.

Susan Amador
503.464.8681 office


please have someone pick this up for me today.  thank you.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 09:44 AM
---------------------------

Gwendolyn Williams@ENRON
07/07/2000 05:03 PM
To:
cc:  (bcc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT)
Subject: PRC Binders

Hello, my name is Gwendolyn Gray.  I am in the Associate/Analysts Human
Resources Department.  Your PRC Binders are ready to be picked up and are
located in EB 1197.  I will be in my location until 5:30 today and all day on
Monday, July 10.  Thanks in advance.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:56 AM
To:	Art_R_Morris@fpl.com; Spraggins, Gary; Adams, Jean; Linhart, Joe; Michael_Jessop@fpl.com; Janzen, Randy; Ronald_Scheirer@fpl.com; TransOKnoms@enogex.com
Cc:	Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris
Subject:	Lamar Nomination

REVISED NOMINATION.  Increase volume for January 16, 2002 from 57,000 to
60,000.

(See attached file: NNG LAMAR NOMNATION.xls)

__________________

Attached is the NNG Lamar burn schedule for January 16, 2002.  At this time
we plan on  57,000.

Thanks

Jamie Schnorf - FPL
561-625-7032

(See attached file: NNG LAMAR NOMNATION.xls)
 - NNG LAMAR NOMNATION.xls
 - NNG LAMAR NOMNATION.xls


I think she will have a great time.  The moms and dads are very friendly.
She'll probably know some of them!

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 04/19/2001 04:01:14 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann \(E-mail\)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Birthday Party on 25th

I tried...NM

-----Original Message-----
From: Brashear, Charlotte [mailto:cbrashear@velaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:45 PM
To: 'nmann@erac.com'
Subject: RE: Birthday Party on 25th

   Absolutely not.  I will leave work at 3:00 and can be at the party
by 4:00.  Just let me know what the kid's name is so we will get in the
right party.  I'm just training a junior secretary and it's ABSOLUTELY NO
PROBLEM.  I enjoy the parties.

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Mann [mailto:nmann@erac.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:45 PM
To: 'Brashear, Charlotte'
Subject: RE: Birthday Party on 25th

Charlotte,
I just realized the party starts at 4 pm at the Houstonian. I don't what you
to have to take off early from work for this. Let's just have you do the
normal pick up on Tuesday and I will handle the party on Wednesday. NM

-----Original Message-----
From: Brashear, Charlotte [mailto:cbrashear@velaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:03 AM
To: Mann Neil (E-mail); Mann Kay (E-mail)
Subject: Birthday Party on 25th

   I have this on my book and will cover Tuesday and Wednesday (24 &
25).  Let me know how early I should pick him up at school as it is no
problem for me to get away early.

   In fact, I enjoy these kid birthday parties.

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Exploratory BID price information, not for transaction purposes.

A. $35  Call On-Peak hourly 6/1/02-5/31/12:     $2.35kwm
B. $100  Call On Peak hourly 6/1/02-5/31/12 Summer Only (M,N,Q)  $2.49kwm
C. $25 Call Off-Peak hourly (M-F Only) 6/1/02-5/31/12:   $0.03kwm
D. $25 Call Off-Peak hourly 6/1/02-5/31/12:    $0.77kwm

Model Assumptions:
Enron Bid and ERCOT Bid Curves (5/18/00)
Bid Vol and Book Vol Smile
Hourly Calls

Garrett
39335


Closeups of the WTC...

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve & Debbie Barone [mailto:sandbar1@optonline.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Glenn Wylie; Watson, Dan; Wasilewski, Paul; Tarallo, Dan; Stadtman,
Chuck; Kevin Sorce; Rick Schroeder; Harry Roch; Rebecca Quenet; Matt
Oleary; Nick Nesto; Diana Miller; Bobby & Josephine Menendez; Mantione,
Charles; Chris Little; Krambach, Tom; Laura Giampietro; Rich Flynn; Joe
Fanelli; Drews, Richie; Draper, Daniel; Domenic, Matt; John Dodge;
Joseph Dick; Dennis Villanueva; Dean Delitta; Suzette Cushman; Cushman,
John; Ken Cherasaro; Busichio, John; Daniel Burrer; Buck, Charlie; Ron
Bartke; Terry & Lenore Barone; Brian Barone
Subject: Fw: The FIRST Warning Sign

> FBI have uncovered the very first warning sign that was from one of the
WTC
> towers.
>
>

 - advertencia.pps


Attached is an outline of the EBS redeployment plans.  Please advise if you
have any questions.

Marla Barnard (marla_barnard@enron.net)
Vice President - Human Resources
Enron Broadband Services
713-345-8158 (Office)
713-646-2678 (Fax)


The Internet provides instant access to global information, products and
services.
Technological advancements, such as faster computer processors and Internet
connections, make access easier and more efficient.

In keeping with Enron's vision to be the best company to work for in the
U.S.,
the Company is considering offering a program that will empower eligible
employees -- and their families -- by providing access to this new technology
from their homes.

The attached survey will give the program administrators the information
needed
to assess Enron employee participation.  Your feedback is critical and we
would
appreciate you taking a few moments to give us your opinion.  Click the link
below
to begin the survey or copy and paste the URL address in your Internet
browser
address line.

 http://hrweb.enron.com/corp/survey/connection/default.asp


Notice No.  01-161
May 10, 2001

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
Approved Amendments to the Supplements of the Grade 1 Copper Futures
Contract, the Gold Futures Contract, the Silver Futures Contract, the
Aluminum Futures Contract, the Platinum Futures Contract and the Palladium
Futures Contract.

NOTE:
Entire notice available at
http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_161.pdf

The Exchange has received approval from the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (&CFTC8) to amend the Supplements of the Grade 1 Copper Futures
Contract, the Gold Futures Contract, the Silver Futures Contract, the
Aluminum Futures Contract, the Platinum Futures Contract and the Palladium
Futures Contract. The approved amendments update the addresses and telephone
numbers of the service providers to these contracts.

The approved amendments are effective immediately.

A copy of the approved amendment can be found at
http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_161.pdf.  Underlining
indicates additions, bracketing [ ] indicates deletions.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Albert J.
Getz at 212-299-2608 or Ploumi Efkarpidis at 212-299-2334.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-161)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEPENO>
To: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com
Date: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:21:57 GMT
Subject:

Your message has been relayed
to the following recipient(s):

jls@fullenweider.com
Message relayed

The message was successfully delivered to 1 recipient(s)
at domain fullenweider.com.

 - C.DTF
 - C.DTF


Russell's paradox (RUS-uhls PAR-uh-doks) noun

   A paradox of set theory in which an object is defined in terms of a
   class of objects that contains the object being defined, resulting
   in a logical contradiction.

[Named after Bertrand Russell (1872-1970).]

   `Post No Bills.'
   "Professor Howard Shane of Baruch College (CUNY) wonders if there is a
   Russell's Paradox in the accompanying picture."
   Allan J. Rossman & Beth L. Chance, Teaching the reasoning of statistical
   inference, The College Mathematics Journal, Sep 1, 1999.

This week's theme: syndromes, paradoxes, laws, and principles.

.............................................................................
If we had no winter, the spring would not be so pleasant: if we did not
sometimes taste of adversity, prosperity would not be so welcome. -Anne
Bradstreet

Send your comments about words to anu@wordsmith.org.  To subscribe or
unsubscribe A.Word.A.Day, send a message to wsmith@wordsmith.org with
"Subject:" line as "subscribe <Your Name>" or "unsubscribe".  Archives,
FAQ, gift subscription form, and more at: http://wordsmith.org/awad/

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/russells_paradox.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/russells_paradox.ram


eSource presents SDC Platinum training

SDC Platinum offers detailed transactional information on New Issues, Mergers
& Acquisitions, Syndicated Loans, Private Equity, Strategic Alliances,
Project Finance and others.  The product is designed to allow users to
compare transactions, evaluate advisors, and analyze market and industry
trends.

Training Agenda Includes:
? General Introduction.
? Basic query techniques for new issues and M&A databases.
? Basic query techniques for trend analysis.

Attend our SDC Platinum Clinic:

May 30     9:00 -11:30 AM   EB552

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com


Shirley,

Did we renew it?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Institutional Investor Journals <webinfo@iijournals.com> on 04/19/2001
11:03:59 AM
To: "vkamins@enron.com" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Continue Enjoying IIJournals -- Renew Today!

Dear Vince Kaminski,

We hope you are enjoying the benefits of receiving market-leading, rigorous
and current research from industry experts through your subscription to
DERIVATIVES QUARTERLY.

Unfortunately, your subscription is about to expire!  By renewing now, your
access to the web site and to your print copies will be uninterrupted.

You can continue to get the exclusive research and practical advice for
financial practitioners ) written by the best minds in your business!

Click here to Renew Today
http://www.iijournals.com/account/myaccount.asp

Thank you.


Enron has begun its executive solicitation for United Way.  You should have
received an email providing the intranet address where you can pledge
online.
(Please note:  when entering the information online - enter 4 digits for your
birth year).

I encourage you to be the leaders in giving for Governmental Affairs/Public
Relations and make your pledge this week.

Further, please invite the generous participation of the people in your
groups.  Thank you for your involvement.


In addition to the EES length in NP-15 for 04-20, we also have ST-CALI length
in PGE3 for 04_20 and 04_21.  ST-CALI is 40 mws long in PGE 3 on peak
beginning HE 7.  We will sell this energy off under ST-CALI's book and figure
out a cost basis later.

Thanks.
Bill


Per my voicemail, attached is the ISDA Agreement revised to reflect those
guaranty changes you agreed to.


Please remove my name from you distribution.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


The Williams 10th Annual 100K bike ride from Sam Houston Race Park to Kemah will be on Saturday, May 19.  $60 in donations is required at packet pickup.  If you use the attached Matching Gift form, you will only need to turn in $30.  If you are interested in participating in this ride, please get your entry form and matching gift form with pledges to me before Monday, May 14.  I'm located at EB2414.

Steph :  )


Dan, are you managing or do we need to discuss?

Regards
Delainey
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leff, Dan
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 7:37 AM
To:	Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David W.
Subject:	FW: Mass Market Contract processing status update

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Greiner, Kevin
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 4:03 PM
To:	Apollo, Beth; Gahn, Scott; Rexrode, Stuart; Merril, Deborah D.; Frank, Mark; Ku, Karl
Cc:	Stubbs, Shelly; Blachman, Jeremy; Leff, Dan
Subject:	RE: Mass Market Contract processing status update

We have presented the following customer counts to buyers, which are compared below against Beth and Shelly's numbers:

		Count presented		Total Available (from Beth)		Shortfall
Texas			14,696			17,100				14%
New York		7,658			8,500				10%
Massach.		4,944			5,700				13%

The count presented to buyers came by utilizing the data in the sequel server database (maintained by Chris McCaig and Mary John) and the information in the RPS system (the booking batch files).  We are working with deal capture to determine the sources of discrepancies.

After receiving bids today, we will 1. determine to what extent we want to book and process remaininig deals, 2. develop a plan for developing the definitive mass market customer list.

Kevin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Apollo, Beth
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Gahn, Scott; Rexrode, Stuart; Greiner, Kevin; Merril, Deborah D.; Frank, Mark
Cc:	Stubbs, Shelly; Blachman, Jeremy; Leff, Dan
Subject:	Mass Market Contract processing status update

Just a quick update from Shelly and I on where we stand with processing all of the Mass Market contracts.  We will need more resources to process the remaining 6,000 contracts.  We estimate that it would take 12 people 1 week.

  Texas  ---

We are aware of  approximately 18,000 contracts signed to date  -- of those approximately 900 were rejected for Credit and Data Issues - net contracts 17,100

                          6,000   completely processed and on hold at CSC
                          7,700   processed but not submitted to CSC
                          3,400   NEED TO BE Booked and processed
                         ---------
                         17,100  Total available TX contracts

In order to process them  -- they need to be booked to the risk books (Deb  -- assume you can have someone work on this)  and then Shelly's team can validate and pull the extra data that is needed  -- ESID's and 4 digit zip code extensions.  They will also validate credit approval etc like usual.  May need additional people to find missing data like Mary John's team used to do.

The goal would be to have all of the data ready to tranfer to a buyer  -- so that they can quickly enroll these customers, and have a very clean list of contracts with corresponding values.

New York

We are aware of 9,200 contracts signed to date  -- of these 700 were rejected for a net remaining contrac number of 8,500.

                        5,600 completely processed and sent to CSC   (  x are already live and  y are on hold for enrollment) -- we are getting this breakdown now
                        1,400  processed but not submitted
                        1,500 NEED TO BE Booked and processed
                        -------
                         8,500   total available NY contracts

Similar processing   -- these deals need to be accounted for  -- by booking them

Mass.

We are aware of 6,500 contracts signed to date  -- of those 800 were rejected leaving 5,700 contracts to be processed

                          4,500 completely processed and sent to CSC (x are already live and y are on hold for enrollment )  (we are getting this breakdown now)
                             200 more processed but not submitted
                          1,000  NEED TO BE Booked and processed
                          ---------
                          5,700   total available Mass.  contracts
Similar processing   -- these deals need to be accounted for  -- by booking them

We will need to either hire contractors or borrow staff from other business units to complete this processing.  We estimate that with 6 extra staff this effort would take 2 weeks.  We could cut that time in half with double the staff.  This does not include an estimate of time to book each transaction into RPS thru the batch process.


Have you eaten?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:20 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Subject:	RE:

not sure, meet you in the lobby?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:19 PM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	RE:

Will my UBS pass work there?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:19 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Subject:	RE:

on the fourth floor

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:18 PM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	RE:

Ground hog day.
They have asked me to sign non-compete.  I don't want to sign contract as is.
Where are you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:16 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Subject:

you watch any of sharron watkins. she does paint a pretty picture. hows it going?


Cargill said that we do not have a line of credit nor do we have money
sitting in an account with them.
The account is inactive at this time.

Let's review our next step when you have an opportunity.
Thanks
David


Are they coming?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Capestany, Mari
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:21 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John
Subject:	The Maple Leafs

I have been notified that TD Securities will be coming Wednesday morning for due diligence on NetCo.  They will arrive between 8 and 8:30am with a team of 9 people and plan on being here through Thursday night.   I will be coordinating things for them on the corp dev side.  Please let me know who your commercial coordinator is and the schedule for the first day presentations.

The data room is currently located in ECN3371; however we are trying to find a room that would be more accomodating for such a large group.

I will send you the names and titles of TD's team as soon as I get it.

Thanks,
Mari Capestany
x33519


<http://ste.clickability.com/ste.gif?151|5180|4170|989|989|989|7499646|N|2|>
  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>	  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>
 	 Texas Monthly <http://www.texasmonthly.com>	   <http://images.clickability.com/logos/cc0000/emailthis-logo.gif>

  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>

 	 2nd try

  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>

 	 Click the following to access the sent link:

 	   <http://images.clickability.com/partners/989/etIcon.gif>Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1276239214>

 	 SAVE THIS link <http://texasmonthly.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=saveFromET&partnerID=989&etMailToID=1276239214>	 FORWARD THIS link <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&etMailToID=1276239214&partnerID=989>

Please note, the sender's email address has not been verified.

Get your EMAIL THIS Browser Button and use it to email information from any Web site.	  <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=browserButtons>

	  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>


whatever it was, I think you sent the email to Kim E. Ward in London.  Please resend to Kim S. Ward in houston.


Chris, you are officially the king today!  With the PSCo deal this
effectively eliminates the LM position assuming we successfully sell LV.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000
08:15 AM ---------------------------

Christopher F Calger
10/04/2000 07:16 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CA ISO Sumer Reliability Generation

Dave,

The CA ISO Board met today and approved a plan to provide capacity subsidies
to up to 2,000 MW of new supply.  There was 71 proposals from 24 companies.
We offered 7 proposals.  Their decision criteria is ridiculous and subject to
change, but it looks like we won the following:

1 LM6000 - 45MW - Pleasonton - $6.9MM per year for three years -  $153/kwyear

1 LM6000 - 45MW - LODI - $6.9MM per year for three years - $153/kwyear

4 FT4's - 96MW - Southern/Palo Alto - $13.2MM per year for three years -
$137/kwyear

Las Vegas Cogen / EPMI 225MW Palo Verde Sale $10MM per year for three years -
$44/kwyear

In the first three deals, we have the full rights to the energy; capacity
payments are for availability.  These payments, combined with reasonable toll
values, terminal value and EPC costs, make the projects economic (DASH
forthcoming).

The last deal is a bit strange and non-conforming but the ISO likes it
because it is priced very low.  Basically, we agree to deliver power to the
ISO at the California border next summer priced at PX Index plus $20/MWh.  CA
ISO takes power, sells into PX and receives Index.  This is cheaper than what
they are paying for new capacity in state.  The $20 premium is simply the
basis between Palo and SP15.  In 2002 and 2003, LVCogen commits to sell 500
hours to CA ISO and receive PX for its energy.  In 02 and 03, the Palo/SP
spread collapses so an asset buyer sees this $20MM as gravy.

Lot of moving parts - I will keep you posted.  Parquet, Mcdonald and Laird
are doing a great job.

Chris


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread77.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread77.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread77.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack77.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack77.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


This should be in your Enron Favorites:
http://enaresearch.dev.corp.enron.com/research/framework/default.asp

Select FX and Sovereign Risk on the dropdown box and then go to US Calendar.
The Global Markets Monitor link  is also good.


As we discussed, here is the second set of Q&As.   Your comments would be appreciated.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Cole
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:59 PM
To:	Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Oxley, David; Joyce, Mary
Cc:	O'rourke, Tim; Cash, Michelle; Barrow, Cynthia
Subject:	Q&As
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

Please review the questions and answers in the attached spreadsheet.  Michelle Cash has reviewed the attached answers and will forward to other relevant/appropriate legal counsel for final review.  Please forward any revisions to me.  Thanks, Cole.


Lisa;

contact me with questions, this is just an idea of what is on Half.com and eBay.com.
The entire link is not highlighted on either link.  You need to copy and paste ot all, or redo your search.

enough is enough...

Cheri

http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?MfcISAPICommand=GetResult&ht=1&
SortProperty=MetaEndSort&ebaytag1code=0&query=LSAT

http://half.ebay.com/search/search.jsp?nthTime=1&product=books&keyword=LSAT&
x=17

Thank you;
Cheri Thomas
Transmission & Energy Services
503.464-5078
503.464-8178, fax
503.803.1885, cell
E-mail: "Cheri_thomas@pgn.com"

3WTC-0506
121 SW Salmon Street
Portland, Oregon  97204


Shelley, FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Dennis
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:16 AM
To:	Buchanan, John; Hernandez, Bert; Kowalke, Terry; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Christopher; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda; Blair, Lynn; Steele, Patricia; Brostad, Karen; Brown, Elizabeth; Carter, Zuela; Trevino, Linda; Buehler, Craig; Dasilva, Esther
Cc:	Dietz, Rick
Subject:	Citizen's request to terminate agency agreement with ENA

We received a request from Citizens Communications Company immediately terminating their agency agreement with ENA for the following TW contracts

20822, 20834, 26791, 26580.

PLE and CBS have been updated.

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


It's been changed to Prebon.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:55 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout

yes i think deal 549010 should be Prebon instead of Amerex.

Thanks!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:39 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout

Prebon
Sean Crandall
549048 - changed to NP

Diana Scholtes
Prebon broker said our price (215) and del. point (Cob) are right

Jeff Richter
549013 - changed to APB

549010 - enron buys BP/Apr01/NP/peak/207.00 (in with Amerex - should it be
Prebon?)

Chris Mallory - just entered Williams deal

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:27 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/13 Checkout

AMEREX
All deals checked out fine

PREBON

Sean Crandall
deal 549048
Prebon shows del. point as NP-15

Diana Scholtes
deal 549053
Prebon shows price as $141 and delivery pt as Mid-C

Jeff Richter
deal 549013
Prebon does not recognize

I am missing the following:
1) Enron buys from BP Energy 25 mw of April'01 NP-15 peak hrs at $207
2) Enron buys Williams 25 mw of SP-15 of April'01 off-peak hrs at $107

BLOOMBERG
All deals checked out fine.


Heather,
I spoke with Chris and he is on board with the annuity of $18750 from ST-CALI to ST-WHOURLY.
Thanks for the help with this.

Bill


Start Date: 1/30/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002013015.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2000 11:12
AM ---------------------------

Frances Ortiz
01/07/2000 02:54 PM
To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Trisha lunch

Jeff has approved for her to be added for lunch everyday and bodweek

thanks
fso


Look what just came in.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 02:23
PM ---------------------------
From: John R Ayres on 12/11/2000 02:23 PM
To: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roderick Blackham/SA/Enron@Enron, Glauco
Palhoto/SA/Enron@Enron, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: GE S&S LM 6000 Electrobolt Contract

Brett, just to let you know I am finished with Lee Johnson on this end.  Kay
may have additional items, but it looks like you are set.  Lee Johnson will
e-mail it out when he gets back to his office.
Thanks,
John


Hi Theresa,

Please take a look at the pricing in Sitara versus your spreadsheet. I'm faxing you copies of the invoices that are in the system; I've recently redrafted this morning. The volumes tie, so the pricing must be off somewhere.

Thanks!

Valerie Vela
Specialist, Gas Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
t: 713.345.8749
f: 713.646.8420


Attached is the TW weekly report for March 22, 2002.

Jan Moore
X53858


FYI.  Bill Gang of EES Federal Solutions has been working actively with the
Air Force in California.  I've participated in weekly calls with them in the
effort to get them energized about DA.  Turns out they're precluded by law
from lobbying.  But they seem to have other ways of being influential.  I've
put Scott Govenar in contact with them and he's keeping them in the DA
Coalition loop.  Bill/Scott is this guy familiar to you?  Bill any
suggestions on how we might best target them in our efforts to get groups
energized?  Bill:  Perhaps you could phone Janel Guerrero directly to
discuss?  Her number is:  713.853.9104 (is that right Janel)?

Best,
Jeff

	Susan J Mara
	03/15/2001 05:43 PM

		 To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Air FOrce Contact on Direct Access

I think a Ken letter is a great idea.  I'll ask him about participating in
the Coalition.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854

	Janel Guerrero
	03/15/2001 03:34 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Air FOrce Contact on Direct Access

This is great Sue.  I would like to loop him into our non-business target
with a letter from Ken.  Do you also see them having a role in the Direct
Access Coaltion?  I'll let you work that end.

	Susan J Mara
	03/15/2001 05:29 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Air FOrce Contact on Direct Access

let's see how we can use this guy.  He is already communicating with Scott
Governor -- I'll forward that email next.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 03:27 PM -----

	Wells Bill LtCol HQ AFCESA/ULT <Bill.Wells@tyndall.af.mil>
	03/14/2001 08:48 AM

		 To: Susan.J.Mara@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: FW: SBX 27 -- Direct Access Language Proposed by Bowen

Thanks - that is what I had assumed.

One of your e-mails was forwarded to me by my people at Edwards AFB.  As the
lead utility counsel for one of the larger purchasers of electricity in the
state, I am obviously very interested in this subject.  Keeping the direct
access option is important to us, not just to keep the state honest on price
shifting between customer classes, but also for reasons of reliability and
power composition.  As a Federal agency, we have a goal to meet on renewable
power, and this will be difficult if not impossible to do if we do not have
some degree of choice in the composition of our electricity.

Bill C. Wells, Lt Col, USAF
Chief, Utility Litigation Team
DSN 523-6347; 850-283-6347

Note new e-mail address:
    bill.wells@tyndall.af.mil

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan.J.Mara@enron.com [mailto:Susan.J.Mara@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:14 PM
To: Wells Bill LtCol HQ AFCESA/ULT
Cc: Govenar Scott (E-mail); smara@enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: SBX 27 -- Direct Access Language Proposed by Bowen

I'm not sure how you got my name, but I believe that the proposed language
has not yet been officially introduced.  It's being circulated for comments
now.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854

                    Wells Bill LtCol

                    HQ AFCESA/ULT            To:     smara@enron.com

                    <Bill.Wells@tynda        cc:     "Govenar Scott
(E-mail)"
                    ll.af.mil>               <sgovenar@govadv.com>

                                             Subject:     FW: SBX 27 --
Direct Access
                    03/13/2001 02:21         Language Proposed by Bowen

                    PM

I apologize for being dense, but when I checked the version of SBX 27 on
the
legislative web site, it is nothing like what is discussed in your e-mail.
Is there an amendment (or several of them) that I have missed and that are
not showing on the site (which shows no movement since the bill was
introduced)?  I have attached an RTF file of the version of the bill I
found
on the website at:

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx1_27_bill_20010131_intro

duced.html

Please give me a call if you have a minute to discuss this situation.

Bill C. Wells, Lt Col, USAF
Chief, Utility Litigation Team
DSN 523-6347; 850-283-6347

Note new e-mail address:
    bill.wells@tyndall.af.mil

-
Subject: FW: SBX 27 -- Direct Access Language Proposed by Bowen

-----Orig
From: wgang@enron.com [mailto:wgang@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 8:44 AM
To: Leo.Weaver@edwards.af.mil
Subject: SBX 27 -- Direct Access Language Proposed by Bowen

Things are looking up!  If this passes, we should be in pretty good shape.
Note the part that says we can operate as we wish up to June 1!

Bill
---------------------- Forwarded by William Gang/HOU/EES on 03/02/2001
08:42 AM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara@ENRON
03/01/2001 06:43 PM

To:
cc:
Subject:  SBX 27 -- Direct Access Language Proposed by Bowen

This is an OK bill.  Not well drafted. It's also overly complicated and
proscriptive.

Deletes the offensive part of ABX 1.
It allows anybody to do whatever they want until June 1 (section 2 d)
On June 1,
  - res and small commercial customers can get in a cue and get DA up to
the # of MWs that are added through load growth. (Section 2 e)
  -- Larger customers would pay an exit fee. (section 2 f)
  -- DA customers would be a entrance fee to return to IOU service (Section
2 g)

There is also a confusing section (2 c) that says a retail customer is only
stuck with CDWR for the proportion of power that CDWR provides.  The way it
reads, if CDWR is providing 40% of the IOUs' power, the retail customer can
get DA for 60% of its load.  I doubt that will fly -- too difficult to keep
track of and ISO will oppose (only one scheduling coordinator/meter)

A conference call and meeting is scheduled with parties tomorrow on this
language.

Will keep you apprised.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 04:28 PM -----

                    Scott Govenar

                    <sgovenar@gov       To:

                    adv.com>            cc:

                                        Subject:

                    03/01/2001

                    04:02 PM

Attached, please find the proposed amendments to SBX 27 (Bowen) relating
to direct access.  There will be a direct access coalition conference
call tomorrow to discuss current events as well as the new language.

(See attached file: SB27Xlanguage.doc)

(See attached file: SBX27 (text).rtf)


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001
10:25 AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
04/10/2001 10:10 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Rick Shapiro Presentation (Updated)

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001
10:10 AM ---------------------------

Ginger Dernehl
03/29/2001 04:45 PM
To: Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Rick Shapiro Presentation (Updated)

Lauren,

Mr. Shapiro has updated his presentation.  Can you make sure that this
version is available to him for Monday's meeting?  Also, will his
presentation be saved on a computer for his use or does he need to have it on
a "CD/diskette"?

Thanks

gngr
713-853-7751


I have discussed relocating Shari to Portland with both of you.  Elizabeth
wanted to make sure that she had hired at least one additional attorney
before Shari could move to Portland.  When I spoke to Mark earlier this week
he indicated that January 1st  was a reasonable deadline.  I would like to
get some closure/finality on this matter -- both from a business perspective
and to allow Shari to know what the future holds.  Let me know your thoughts.


so it last week, pretty funny.  It looks like an actual commercial.  How are
things going with you?  Good I hope.  When am I going to get an invite to the
new pad?
PL