Call Charles T. Jeremiah
he does 99% employment law issues and cases.

at 713 592 5000
or 713 839 8131

Thanks

Todd C. Feder
Kelly, Jeremiah, & Feder, L.L.P.
Attorney at Law
(713) 839-8131
lawfeder@msn.com

>From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>
>To: "Todd Feder (E-mail)" <lawfeder@email.msn.com>
>Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:52:20 -0600
>
>hey, send me some information that i can forward to someone who might
>need an employment attorney
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Here are the filings for TW for this year.


These deals were entered as flowing all days, and should have just been Mon -
Sat. This was my fault, as I didn't know my computer defaulted to all days.
(This has since been fixed!) I've changed them in the system and was told to
let you know so you can re-confirm the deals with just on-peak days. Sorry
about the hassle. I promise I'll get the hang of this soon!

Thanks,
Kate


Great!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:08 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: Powder River Confirms for September

The one for WIC is the top one - CIG Gas Daily +.10 #1019833.
The second two lines are the Index - .10  (it's split in 2 lines for their 2 areas of production with different btu factors)
The fourth one is the Gas Daily volume that we are pricing on a daily basis.

I will be in Houston tomorrow and will plan on attending the 10:00 meeting in Gerald's office.

See you then,
Theresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:41 PM
To:	Staab, Theresa
Subject:	RE: Powder River Confirms for September

Which one the Kennedy's is WIC?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	Powder River Confirms for September

Debra,
Here is the spreadsheet for September confirms.

The green column is Mcf and the purple column is MMBtu at the wellhead.

Also, on Kennedy we are pricing her Gas Daily gas on a daily basis throughout the month so I guess we'll have to send her confirm after the month is over. (or state that the "minus number" is determined on a daily basis)

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Theresa
(303) 575-6485

  << File: Nom Summary - September 2001 Final.xls >>


Mark,

Where do we stand on putting Prebon changes in the Beta.  Thanks for the help
on the Amerex  contract yesterday.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 09:31 AM
---------------------------

"Lee C. Taylor (NJ)" <LCTaylor@prebon.com> on 02/16/2001 03:48:31 PM
To: "Mike Bridges (E-mail)" <Michael.Bridges@enron.com>, "Bob Shults
(E-mail)" <Bob.Shults@Enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fee Agreement and BETA

I thought it would accelerate the process somewhat if I explained my
confusion with the recently received Fee Agreement and Broker Electronic
Transaction Agreement.  After working for several weeks on the language of
the Letter of Intent, it was discouraging to receive the BETA and the Fee
Agreement.  The following comments below highlight what I see as the primary
commercial areas of difference between the LOI and the draft documentation:

* No commitment by EOL that prices on EOL and the broker website will
be the same.
* No reference to the fact that credit will be checked simultaneously
with Prebon's clicks to trade.
* No mention that Prebon Energy has no obligation to transact on the
website.
* No commitment by EOL to provide access to the website, even if
Prebon is restricted from executing transactions on a voice basis.  (In
fact, the BETA expressly states that access can be denied.)
* No commitment by EOL to provide prices continuously during normal
business hours.
* No mention that Prebon will not have any liability for settlement of
a transaction once confirmed by Prebon's customer.
* No mention of our ability to provide credit support in another form
acceptable to Enron such as a parent guarantee.
* No mention of the breakdown in the fee schedule - $250k for US gas
and electricity and $200K for UK/Electricity and no mention of the
additional products.
* The LOI limited free brokerage to trades executed via the website.

These are some, but not all, of the business concepts that we discussed and
agreed to for the Letter of Intent, that were excluded from the Fee
Agreement and BETA.

I would appreciate if you could discuss some of the points I described
above.  I will be in Houston from Feb 19 until Feb 21 and be back in the
office on the 22nd.  We could set up a conference call for Feb 22 to discuss
these points.  I have also spoken with Nanette Crist, and she has agreed to
redraft the Fee Agreement and BETA to reflect the Letter of Intent signed
between Enron Online and Prebon Energy once we have confirmed our
understanding of these points.  Nanette will be on vacation next week;
however, she feels that she will be able to send you the revision by
February 27, 2001.  I look forward to speaking with you next week.  If you
have any questions or comments in the meantime, you can reach me on my cell
phone (908) 209-7618.  Thank you.

Lee C. Taylor
Prebon Energy
(201)557-5829


Vance:

Per our conversation, we have two possible options to resolve this deal,
depending on whether the wellheads are producing or not.

Producing:  If that is the case, the purchase from Calpine, and any contracts
hedged to it will need to be backed up in the system to a wellhead level.
Once that is done, I will need to research in the system how those wellheads
were allocated and paid and reallocate to your Calpine deal.  This will
probably have to go back to HPLC's ownership of HPLR's gathering assets.

Non-producing:  Should we determine that the Common Point and any wells
behind it have been shut-in, or P&A'd, we will need to reallocate this deal
to zero, and unwind any hedges against it (or, move the hedges to another
deal, if possible.  Since the deal is older, we probably sold lower priced
contracts against the production and a buy-back today would possibly result
in a financial loss).

In either case, the deal needs to be cleaned up back to the date of last flow
at meter 4229, which I am currently looking into.  I will email you as soon
as I ascertain that date.

In lieu of the past couple of days, we may need to look at all of the deals
which were impacted by HPLC's aquisition of HPLR's gathering to ensure that
they are being captured properly, both at a book level and at a state filing
level.  Please let me know what your thoughts are as to how to accomplish
this.

Thank you again for all of your hard work in this area,

Mary


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

June 1, 2001 5:00pm through June 4, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001

This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network.  While this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services, this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities.  No network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown.  The actual physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th floor Data Center.

Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th 2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT). Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network testing has completed.

If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at 713-410-0642 for more information.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     9:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Enable routing on new router ecn-34-cor-ccr1
Environments Impacted:  ENS
Purpose: This router will be used to connect to the new building
Backout: remove routing on the router.
Contact(s): 	Scott Shishido    713-853-9780

Impact:  AEP
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Shutting off the internal link to 1201 Louisiana
Environments Impacted:  AEP
Purpose: Company occupying that space has been sold.
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
                        Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

Impact:  ENS/GCO
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001    thru Wed 7/4/2001
Outage:  HPL migration to AEP
Environments Impacted:  GCO
Purpose: Sites sold
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
		Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  Internet
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    8:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     8:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Reboot Enron.com edge routers
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: Regular reboot to prevent such problems as memory corruption. Intermettent disruption to last about five minutes.
Backout:
Contact(s): 	John Shupak          713-853-7943
		Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Corp Notes
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  cNotes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: Make sure server comes up.
Contact(s): 	Trey Rhodes  (713) 345-7792

Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EI Notes Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EI Local/Domestic/Foreign Sites
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: N/A
Contact(s): 	David Ricafrente    713-646-7741

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 07:42 AM -----

	Ginger Dernehl
	03/15/2001 10:29 AM

		 To: assad@elektro.com.br, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alberto
Levy/SA/Enron@Enron, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Allison
Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy Fabian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, cristinah@elektro.com.br, Carmen
Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chauncey Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave
Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donald Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eidy Catala/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Geriann Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Germain
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Gisele S
Braz/SA/Enron@Enron, Gloria Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard
Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, jpr@ceibo.entelnet.bo, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Javier
Pantoja/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Jean R Dressler/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean
Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joao
Paixao/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Kikumi Kishigami/NA/Enron@Enron, Kirsten
Bellas/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Laurie
Knight/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lindsay
Meade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Melinda
Pharms/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick
Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ray
Alvarez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ricardo
Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy
Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Rubena Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sergio
Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Stella Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Terri
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Valeria Lima/SA/Enron@Enron, Vinio Floris/Corp/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request from Bob Frank

gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 10:27 AM -----

	Robert Frank
	03/15/2001 09:07 AM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Ginger - please forward this to all of GA.  Thanks.

This is a request for help from my colleagues in GA.  I am preparing Enron's
comments to the Federal Trade Commission concerning the results of different
"regulatory approaches" by states implementing retail electric competition
programs or legislation.  The FTC has invited comments on a number of
specific issues, but their goal is to "examine various state retail
competition programs and describe those features that have resulted in
consumer benefits and those that have not yielded consumer benefits."

There are some obvious areas where we'll comment - California - but I'd
appreciate people sending me specific examples of good or bad regulatory
policies in other states.   Also, does anyone know of any good reports or
analyses already prepared on these issues?   Thanks.  -Bob


The final window for making your 2001 benefits elections or changes ends
11/15 at 5 pm.  If you do not elect to make any changes, your 2000 health
benefit elections will rollover for 2001.

If you still need to make changes, logon to www.enron.benefitsnow.com or call
1-800-425-5864.  You will need your PIN number that is printed on your
personal worksheet to access the web and hotline.

If you have any questions, please call the Benefits Dept. directly at x37979,
option 1, or Anne Labbe, at x57809.


Hi Rob -

Ken said "If you'll prepare the remarks, I'll be happy to do this".

Rosie

Rob Bradley
07/19/2000 09:51 AM

To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Gathering Place Speaking Invitation

If you are inclined to accept this invitation, we could put together an
interesting talk on the importance of good mental health to business with
some national statistics and then segue into Enron's emphasis on wellness and
having fun in the workplace.  Our strategy and experience will be very
interesting to the group since it shows what a corporate leader is doing to
become the employer of choice in the marketplace.

You could expect a full house (around 400) for the talk.  If it fits into
your schedule, Jack Bowen said he would be delighted to be honorary chairman
of the event.

- Rob


I have a favor to ask.  Would you mind asking your team to email or phone me
when they make a location change on a deal in sitara.  We had a case
yesterday where a deal was originally entered at one location for the deal
and for the hedge.  The point was incorrect and a person in logistics
corrected it.  The problem occurs in that sitara looks to verify the
locations are the same on the deal and the hedge and if they are, it will
then value the deal in the trader's book at mid.  If the locations are
different, it will value the deal at the customer price.  This could
potentially have a large impact on the trader's P&L.  It does not seem
pertinent to have your guys changing swap locations in addition to changing
deal locations due to time constraints.  We will be more than happy to make
the changes, and we should also be able to catch these problems in the first
place when we calc our books.  I would greatly appreciate your groups help in
cutting some of these issues off at the pass.  If you have any questions or
concerns, please feel free to give me a shout.  Thanks.
PL


Hi Paul,

Your still alive and kicking out there in the USA I see, thats great.  Keep the side up.

Regards,

Paul, UK
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Thomas/EU/Enron on 09/01/2002 15:27 ---------------------------
From:	Anne Labbe/ENRON@enronxgate on 09/01/2002 09:25 CST
To:	Peter Makkai/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Thomas/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	FW: Tuition Reimbursement

Just as an FYI for you both- you will receive your tuition reimbursement on your 1/31/01 check.  If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Thanks,
Anne

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parra, Veronica
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:58 AM
To:	Labbe, Anne
Cc:	Slone, Jeanie; Alvarez, Irma
Subject:	RE: Tuition Reimbursement

Anne,

Irma did give me the forms last week.  Both Peter and Paul will see their tuition on 1/31/02 check

Veronica Parra
Ext - 34298
HRServiceConnection@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Labbe, Anne
Sent:	Monday, January  7, 2002 3:19 PM
To:	Parra, Veronica
Cc:	Slone, Jeanie; Alvarez, Irma
Subject:	Tuition Reimbursement

Veronica,

I gave those to Irma just before we left for Christmas.  They did not have your stamp on them, as Ben had not turned them into you yet.  Irma said, however, that they could still be processed.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 2:48 PM
To:	Labbe, Anne
Subject:	FW:

we turned in those forms you found lurking in Ben's desk, didn't we?  i think so.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	HR Service Connection
Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	RE:

Jeanie,

We currently do not have tuition for both Paul and Peter.  I did not notice that they are in the Ass/Ana grp.  You might want to check w/ Terry Bosien as her team had this process separate from us at one point.

Veronica Parra
Ext - 34298
HRServiceConnection@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Wednesday, December  19, 2001 10:08 AM
To:	HR Service Connection
Subject:

Paul Thomas and Peter Makkai submitted tuition re-imbursement forms to Kim Melodick prior to bankruptcy approx Nov. 15.  I can not track down the actual paperwork and wanted to make sure that this was being processed.  Please confirm.


I'll call you today


I wish I could take credit for the link success but none of the things I was
trying were what actually did it.  Seems that if you copy from Netscape and
paste into this e-mail system it happens automatically.

Now this one is actually the result of extra geek effort on my part: BVI
Weather.

I'm leaving for a conference here in Houston now and may not be back in the
office before leaving for NY.  I'll have my computer with me but am notorious
for being incapable of accessing my e-mail on the road so telephone is
probably the safest way to reach me from here on.  I check messages at the
office fairly often.

(713)853-7459 (office)
(713)863-7190 (home)
(281)367-1100 (Woodlands Resort & Conference Center - tonight)
(212)355-3000 (Waldorf - arriving Saturday afternoon)

Mark


Mark Your Lunch Calendars!

You are invited to attend the ENA Brown Bag Lunch Series

Featuring Brian Redmond
Managing Director

Discussion Topic:  ENA Upstream

Wednesday, June 21, 2000
11:30 AM ) 12:30 PM
EB 5C2

You bring your lunch -     Limited Seating
We provide drinks and dessert!    RSVP  X 57352


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 10:08 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	10/24/2000 05:34 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kazeem
Khan/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Some thoughts on options

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 05:24 PM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/24/2000 04:45 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: Some thoughts on options

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Richard,

 After today's discussion here are our brainstorming ideas on
options:

1.   WAIT FOR A BETTER PROTECTIVE ORDER
 Ask Harvey Morris where they are on fixing the protective order that
is being litigated by others.  If the protective order has not  changed,
then unilaterally postpone production until it is.  Pro: Better protection
and more time; Con: Even with a more stringent
 protective order Enron still questions whether the PUC is entitled
to financial performance data.  Thus, this option does not fully
disclose all of Enron's positions and the company may be accused later of
simply engaging in delaying tactics.  Under this option  we file our
formal objections as well.

2. TURN OVER THE TRANSACTION DATA AS IS
 Continue on our present course of turning over transaction data for
electricity that was delivered.  Pro: PUC will get the data  anyway
either through FERC, unfair competition, antitrust or price gouging
litigation.  By turning over the data that will show  profits, PUC might
slow down investigation there as opposed to interrupting the business by
seeking to depose witnesses etc.  Con:  This would be waiving the
legitimate question that Enron has as to the PUC's ability to discovery this
information through a  subpoena.  There is also a question of how
confidential this data would be given the current political agenda.  It
might also serve  to whet the appetite of the PUC for more Enron
information and discovery.   This option would also provide confidential
proprietary information to the PUC about how Enron gets its competitive
advantage.

3. TURN OVER DATA FOR OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA AND LET PUC GET REST OF
DATA FROM ISO AND PX.
 We have told the PUC we do not want to duplicate the efforts of ISO
and PX so the way to relieve the burden on us is to give  only missing
data. PRO:  It would be easier and quicker to just give the outside of
California data and would sidestep for the
 moment the ongoing jurisdictional question.  Con:  Without Enron
cost data for the California ISO and PX transactions, the PUC
 would not be able to arrive at what they want -- a profit and loss
picture.  We would have a hard time representing to the PUC that  the
combination of the PUC data and the Enron data would be all that they need
to calculate the answers to Request Nos. 7-10.

4. TURN OVER EVERYTHING BUT PRICE
 This option would simple omit the price data.  Pro:  It would not
reveal the profit and loss information.  Con:  It would not reveal the
profit and loss information.  In other words, the PUC is clear that this is
what they are after.  By giving them everything else, we
 would in effect be telling them we will not turn over profit and
loss.  Moreover, by piecing some of it together with the ISO and PX
data, the PUC might be able to put together a revenue picture which will be
quite large, but just not the cost or expense side.

5. DECLINE TO PRODUCE THE DATA
 We would tell Harvey Morris that Enron has reconsidered its position
for the following reasons:  (1) Our firm belief that the PUC is  not
entitled to the profit and loss data they are seeking; (2) in his latest
email, Harvey has made it clear that the PUC wants more  data (1999)
than we discussed earlier; (3) continued threat that if they do not like the
transaction data they will come back and  ask for profit and loss
information that we do not believe they are entitled to; (4) Commissioner
Wood's statement that the purpose  of this investigation is to get
money from market participants in the hands of consumers; (5) investigation
by the AG into activities  of other market participants and the notice
that other governmental agencies are cooperating -- who are we producing
this  information to and for what purpose; (6) Enron favors public
disclosure of trading data but only if all participants are required to
do so; (7) Enron is a small player in this market and many other market
participants are not involved in the process BPA etc.    PRO:  This
may be the only way to preserve Enron's challenge to the jurisdiction of the
PUC to get this data.  Moreover, in the  current political
environment there is no assurance where this information will be leaked.  It
also makes sense to see what FERC  will do with their published 11/1/00
report on investigation date. Under this option, we file our formal
objections and sit back and  wait.

6. ME TOO
 Upon reflection, we agree with the approach taken by the other
market participants.  We will not produce until the protective order  is
modified and then only data that is within the PUC jurisdiction.  PRO:  This
makes it look like all the market participants are  acting in concert
and really is no different than option 1 above.  Moreover, if you read
Reliant's responses, they appear ready to  turn over financial data if
the protective order is modified. (Terry and Mike Day are both out of their
offices today.)  Note that  Williams is adopting a strategy that says
the PUC needs to go to Superior Court to enforce its subpoena.  This may be
met with  strong opposition by the PUC given their California
constitutional contempt authority.

7. MOVE TO QUASH BEFORE THE ALJ
 Here we would raise all of the arguments that we have about why the
PUC does not have jurisdiction and fight it out on the merits  before the
ALJ.  PRO:  The ALJ is a forum to raise the jurisdictional questions.  It
has the least procedural risks of being  dismissed.  CON:  Reading
the tea leaves, we believe it unlikely that the ALJ will determine that the
PUC has no jurisdiction.
 Moreover, because the PUC has its own constitutionally granted
contempt power, the PUC will take the view (according to Mike  Day) that
they need not go to the Superior Court for enforcement.  They will also take
the view that the Superior Court has no  jurisdiction  to hear our
appeal.  Appeals have to go to the PUC and those orders are appealable at
the Court of Appeal level.   Thus, the only de novo review of our
objections might be at the ALJ level.

8. FILE DECLARATORY RELIEF ACTION IN FEDERAL COURT IN CALIFORNIA
 We would claim federal question jurisdiction under the Federal Power
Act and in particular the provisions of 824(g) under which the PUC
issued its subpoena in part.  The dispute to be decided is whether the PUC
has the jurisdiction to seek the profit and  loss information from the
wholesale market.  The authority for this would be Mississippi Power & Light
v. Mississippi  487 US  354 (bright line between wholesale market regulated
by FERC and the retail market regulated by states); Bristol Energy Corp v.
New Hampshire 13 F.3d 471 (1st Cir. 1994)(federal question whether state
agency can inquire into business and financial data  in the wholesale
market but found no cognizable claim.)  PRO:  The federal forum may be more
even handed than the ALJ, but  the question is whether we can state a
cognizable claim.  There may be greater protections from disclosure of the
information as  well.  CON:  The PUC may continue on a parallel track unless
we are able to obtain injunctive relief.  The PUC might seek  discovery of
the same information in the Federal court proceeding.  We should assume that
this action will trigger the strongest  response from the PUC and/or the AG
in form of further investigations or alternative forums for getting the same
information (e.g  unfair business practice suit, price gouging,
anti-trust etc.).   We should anticipate deposition requests for traders
etc.  By taking  this position, we will clearly be conceding that if
FERC asks for the data it is germane to their authority.

9. SEPARATE RESPONSES/STRATEGIES FOR DIFFERENT ENRON ENTITIES
 It may make some sense to chart a different course for Portland
General, EES and EEMC and continue to produce some data from  those
entities.  PRO:  The information provided for these entities is not likely
to generate profit and loss information that would be  germane to the fight
we are about to engage in (e.g. EES's description of % off tariff rates for
example.)  For Portland General,  Dave Aamodt is out of the office and
not able to participate in any change of direction discussions.

Hope this is helpful.
Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Hi Jon;

This client is looking to contract today. Please give me a live price per the attached file.

Thanks, Mark.


Oops, and one more thing. The price on this is entered both in Jeff's trade
log and in Deal Entry as $214.95. I verified that with Chris Mallory, who's
working on the California desk today. If Prebon still has a discrepancy, let
me know.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
12/04/2000 10:18 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing deal for Jeff Richter for Dec.1

JEff Richter
Prebon sent over a statement where:
Enron buys from EES 12/5-12/30 25 mw of SP-15 at $114.95


[IMAGE]

			[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		 RIGZONE [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		   home    | news    | search    | maps    | data    | jobs    | market    | store  	[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		      Get 1 Month Free! Purchase a 12-month subscription to any of Rigzone's data subscription products mentioned in this newsletter between now and January 31, and we'll extend your subscription by one additional month free of charge! Want to learn more? Check out our products below.       [IMAGE]   Take a look into the future with Rigzone's Permit Service. Covering the offshore Gulf of Mexico area, our permits and plans provide valuable insight into things to come - when a drilling project will begin, who the operator is, who will do the drilling, and much more. Forecast future business and know where to look for new business.   full search capabilities   customizable search results   printer-friendly pages   a historical database with data going back to 1994  easy-to-use automatic reports on the most active operators, hot areas, deepwater permits and more  daily or weekly email updates    For more information on the Rigzone Permit Service, click here . If you have questions or would like to request a free trial subscription, please send an email to info@rigzone.com .      [IMAGE]   The Gulf of Mexico Activity Report, by Rigzone, is your complete source for Gulf of Mexico news and data. The report, published every other week, is delivered direct to you with all of the important data items you need. It includes  important news from the last two weeks; a complete rig utilization report with data broken down by rig type for the current week, the previous month and the year ago week; rig utilization summary graphs; a GOM day rate report broken down by rig type complete with graphs and recent changes on a per rig basis; recent exploratory permits filed along with historical trend data; and a complete listing of every rig at work in the Gulf at the time of the report. The rig list is complete with operator, rig name, rig type, rated water depth, year built, status, rig manager/owner, block, water depth, and day rate for each rig.   For more information and to purchase your subscription to The Gulf of Mexico Activity Report, click here . If you have questions or would like to request a free trial copy, please send an email to info@rigzone.com .      [IMAGE]   The Rigzone Worldwide Rig Activity Report is the essential guide to offshore drilling activity throughout the world. You will find a comprehensive listing of every mobile offshore drilling unit along with vital information including current operator, operating status and day rate, all organized by rig manager.   The Report is issued once a month. Report data sets include rig name, rig type, rated water depth, year built, status (drilling, cold stacked, under construction, etc.), operator, location, water depth in current location, date of availability, and day rate (when available).     For more information and to purchase your subscription to The Rigzone Worldwide Rig Activity Report, click here . If you have questions or would like to request a free trial copy, please send an email to info@rigzone.com .      [IMAGE]   The Rig Utilization Database provides comprehensive rig counts broken out by month, area of the world, and rig type. This highly accurate data is available going back 10 years to provide a powerful historical perspective.  This online system provides a custom report generation/search tool that  allows you to generate reports based on any combination of the following  criteria: time period (specify start and end date), rig types, and area of the world. Data can also be exported in comma-delimited format for use with Excel and other spreadsheet programs.     For more information and to purchase your subscription to the Rig Utilization Database, click here . If you have questions or would like to request a trial subscription, please send an email to info@rigzone.com .      [IMAGE]   The Day Rate History Database provides average day rates across all types of offshore rigs (drillship, jack-up, semisub, and submersible). Information is available for the Gulf of Mexico, Pacific Rim, and West Africa dating back to 1996. Easily create the reports you need with the report generation tool. Reports break down by year and month providing average day rates for each rig type across each month.    This package includes access to Rigzone's online day rate database for one year.     For more information and to purchase your subscription to the Day Rate History Database, click here . If you have questions or would like to request a trial subscription, please send an email to info@rigzone.com .  	[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
			  Member Services If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, you may unsubscribe by clicking here  or by logging in to Rigzone and updating your profile.   You can also change the format you receive (HTML or Text) and your email address by logging in and updating your account.   Click here to log in .
			[IMAGE]


Jim

You were right. SPP is going to use this episode as a lever to be "promoted" to an RTO.

Texas is recommending three steps to introduce competition at Texas-SPP. One is described as follows:

*	Support the SPP's efforts to begin wholesale market operations: Mr. Brown, Vice President of SPP, testified that SPP can begin wholesale market operations and complete systems testing by April 1, 2002. He has requested that the SPP Board approve his recommendation to start to wholesale market operations. This Commission should support that process by:

-	Requesting in writing that the SPP Board begin wholesale operations as soon as possible with a target date of completing systems testing by April 1, 2002.
-	Advising FERC of the need to support SPP wholesale market operations. While Mr. Brown testified that the recent July and September Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) orders regarding SPP's start up expenditures will not impede SPP from implementing wholesale market operations, this Commission should advise FERC that the findings from our hearing show the need for FERC to fully support SPP wholesale operations startup.


Just wanted to confirm that we are moving ahead for the Intergen closings.

Lisa, I spoke with Karl, and he has promised to let me know if there any
hitches on their end.  His preliminary assessment was that everything was ok,
but he wants to check.

Ben, Kathleen will be bringing the documents to you to initial this
afternoon, then I will sign off so Janet can execute the documents.

Rebecca, please confirm that Carolyn has the final wiring instructions for
the movement of money out of escrow.

I presume that we would like to close early enough to see money move
tomorrow, since the payoff amounts have been calculated based on closing
tomorrow.

I don't know what is required to make the payoff to TurboPark, so I hope
someone knowledgeable is handling that end.

My trip was postponed, so I'm around.

Kay


Dear Investor,

People know me as a "diehard" technology investor.  So
it's sure to surprise many of them when I say:

Most investors WON'T make a dime this year in
technology stocks.

That's because the old game is over.  No more buying
frenzy.  No return to the anything-works days of 1999.
And no easy-pickings.

That's the BAD NEWS.

The GOOD NEWS?  We're already enjoying a new feast of
profits that can make you 75%-to-100% RICHER by this
time next year.  But most investors -- sadly --will
miss out.

That's because the technology "boom" has passed its
revolutionary stage...and turned into an EVOLUTIONARY
process that will give most companies fits.  Good
ideas and innovation are no longer enough.  Execution,
size and financial strength matter MUCH more today.

A ton more "great" companies with "great" technologies
and "great" people will badly disappoint Wall Street
in the coming months.  And any investor using the OLD
rules for investing in tech stocks will get creamed!

YOU CAN SEE it in the old-time tech giants like
Hewlett-Packard and Ericsson that are uncompetitive
today.  You can see it in not-for-profit business
model of Amazon.com.  And you can see it in all the
little gee-whiz technology companies that have tumbled
like bowling pins on league night.

In my view, "betting on tech stocks" today is like a
trip to Vegas without any of the fun.  But -- and
here's the good part -- you can still MAKE YOUR
FORTUNE by investing in those few powerhouses that
still lord above the rest in this incredibly
competitive industry.

In fact, since the beginning of October my entire
POWERHOUSE portfolio (that's every single stock I
recommend, not some made-up "best of" list) is UP 40%.
How about you?  Are you making money like this --
right now -- or are you missing out???

Take a look at some of the stocks my clients and I own
-- and how well they're doing RIGHT NOW:

*I'm sure by now you've heard of Amgen's buyout of the
fast-growing biotech firm Immunex.  When that deal was
announced, it included a 17% premium.  But we've done
much better.  In fact, we just sold for banked 105%
GAINS in just 8-months' time.

*Analysts are jumping back on the cell phone
bandwagon.  Why?  New personal security issues;
soaring sales in China; and a generational shift in
technologies.  Powerhouse Nokia is UP 44% since in
October 1st.

*We're seeing a major shift in how microchips are
manufactured, thanks to the next generation of
technological innovations.  And that means big profits
for the top contract manufacturers like Taiwan
Semiconductor.  We're UP 91% over the same timeframe.

*Of course, security is a HUGE issue now.  And many of
the answers that will make our lives and businesses
more secure are technology-based.  Security POWERHOUSE
Check Point Systems is UP 76%.

*What's more, we're making money in nearly every tech
sector, thanks to our laser-like selectivity.  Even
the beleaguered enterprise software sector has been
good to us -- since the beginning of October, our
stake in Peoplesoft has SOARED 116%!

As you can see, we've made a TON of money already.
And so, you might ask, "Is it TOO LATE for me?"

No.  In fact, you can match these profits in the
coming months -- even beat them; but there is ONE
CATCH.  You must act now.

YOU CAN'T afford to disregard my invitation to join
Technology Investing any longer.  As our recent gains
prove, we are in the midst of a POTENT profit run that
can make you a small fortune in 2002.  But not if you
just sit on your hands.

Several of our stocks that have made huge moves
already still have much further to run.  Join me at
Technology Investing, and I'll tell you which ones --
and why.  Other stocks that have done little so far
are on the verge of rallies that could easily DOUBLE
your money from here.

That's because all tech sectors WON'T come back at
once.  In fact, some won't come back at all.  I'll
help you avoid those many stocks destined to go
nowhere in 2002.  We'll simply move from wave to wave
of profits -- for fun that lasts the entire blessed
year -- instead.

So please don't miss out.  You'll kick yourself big-
time if you miss out. Get my TOP current wealth-
builders now, by accepting a 100% RISK-FREE trial
subscription to my Technology Investing advisory.

TAKE a full six months to measure the value of my
advice for yourself.  Don't like what you see...don't
make the profits you want, just cancel, and your
subscription doesn't cost you a dime.   That's reason
enough to give it a try.  Because if I'm right -- and
I'm staking my reputation and my own money on this
call -- you can BANK 75%-to-100% gains this year alone
in the top technology stocks.

So take a look at Technology Investing to see what you
think.  Our unusual six-month guarantee of total
satisfaction means my advisory costs you nothing if
you don't 100% approve.

Please click here to sign up now:
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=1AR227

Sincerely,

Michael Murphy
Technology Investing

P.S.  The longer you wait, the more profits you MISS
OUT on.  Since October 1st, our entire holdings -- not
cherry-picked, the complete list -- are UP 40%.

And back in 1999 -- after the last big stock market
panic -- we saw what most folks were missing and piled
into select tech stocks for 157% GAINS, as verified by
The Hulbert Financial Digest.  That's without risking
a dime on the dot-com craze!  While I'm not looking
for an exact repeat performance in 2002, I do expect
to earn 75%-to-100% PROFITS in my top tech stocks.
Unfortunately, most investors will just miss out
again.

Don't you miss out.  Go here now:
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=1AR227

------------------------------------------------------

ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT

We hope this free digest of investing advice is
valuable to you. If you'd like to change your e-mail
address (DON.BAUGHMAN@ENRON.COM), or unsubscribe, please
do so by going to the following address:

http://www.investorplace.com/unsubscribe.php

Your name will be removed from our list within 7-10
working days.

------------------------------------------------------

Friday Jan 18, 2002 19:24:19


Pani Agato,

Dwa punkty:

1. Pytania
2. Dodatkowe komplikacje.

I. Pytania

Controlling wprzedsiebiorstwie

1. Prosze przedyskutowac podzial funkcji miedzycontrollingiem i
rachunkowoscia.
Czym rozni sie controlling odwewnetrznego i zewnetrznego auditing.
2. Prosze omowic zalety? oraz wady &rachunku kosztow dzialan8 (ABC).

Analiza wskaznikowa

1. Prosze przedyskutowac ograniczenia analizy wskaznikowej.
2. Prosze omowic istote analizy piramidalnej. Jakie informacje o stanie
finansowym przedsiebiorstwa mozna uzyskac stosujac te metode?

Pezentacja instrumentow analizy finansowej

1. Prosze omowic metody przewidywania potencjalnego? bankructwa firmy przy
zastosowaniu analizy wskaznikiwej.
2. Prosze przedyskutowac klasyfikacje wskaznikow ekonomicznych
wykorzystywanych do ocenyprzedsiebiorstwa.

II. Komplikacje.

We wtorek, 3 kwietnia rano, wylatuje do Filadelfii. Powinienem dotrzec do
hotelu okolo godziny 12 czasu lokalnego, czyli godziny 6:00 wieczorem czasu
polskiego. Roznica czasu w stosunku do Houstonu jest 7 godzin, ?w stosunku
do
wybrzeza wschodniego jest 6 godzin.

Jutro przesle szczegolowy plan podrozy, ktory bedzie zawierac adres i numer
hotelu. Prosze przeslac mi numer, na ktory moge zadzwonic, by podac numer
pokoju, lub zadzwonic z samolotu w przypadku opoznienia lotu.

W. Kaminski


Once again it is time to begin the nomination process for Enron's Chairman's Award.

For those of you who are new to Enron, the Chairman's award is an employee-driven award designed to recognize Enron employees who make a difference in our organization by demonstrating our core values - Respect, Integrity, Communication, Excellence - in everything they do.  These individuals are the Everyday Heroes who make Enron a great place to work. They capture the spirit, the philosophy and the day-to-day business practices of our company in their work, their attitude and how they regard their colleagues.

This award program will only be as successful as your participation in it.  All Enron employees can nominate fellow employees at any level - from the top down or the bottom up.

Nomination forms will be available around the world.  Find the forms on your intranet site or at home.enron.com <http://home.enron.com>.  Direct any questions to mbx_chairmansaward@enron.com

The nomination process is simple.  Complete and submit the nomination form by Wednesday, October 10, 2001.  This year's Selection Committee will then review all nominations and present recommendations to the Office of the Chairman for final approval.

The Chairman's Award winner and finalists will be announced at the annual Enron Management Conference in San Antonio, Texas on November 16, 2001.

I want to personally encourage each of you to think about your colleagues, their contributions to Enron and their adherence to our values.  If there is someone you know who is one of our many "everyday heroes" and you think they deserve to be recognized for their dedication and commitment to Enron's values, now is your turn to speak up?so please take the time to nominate someone you know for this very special award.

I look forward to learning more about our outstanding employees here at Enron and thank you for your participation.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Worthen, Susan
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 11:35 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	Employee Communication Suggestion

Just an observation and suggestion regarding the recent media blitz --- Make sure employees have access to Enron's side of the story via (additional) eBiz features or an e-speak feature with the Office of the Chairman when the 3rd quarter earnings are released.

I hear people talking about some of these articles (like the NY Times article this weekend and the Off Wall Street article a few weeks ago) and they don't know what to think.  The general employee population does not understand our financials and how Enron "makes markets". - At least this is my perception based on conversations that I hear in the elevators and on the bus on my to/from work.

Anyway, my observation is that the problem with being misunderstood does not reside just on the outside.

Susan Worthen
Director
Environmental Compliance, Enron Corp.
713/646-6579, fax 713/345-6164
3AC 15255
Susan.Worthen@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 01:49 PM -----

	"Smith, Charles" <Charles.Smith@alcoa.com>
	04/17/2001 11:43 AM

		 To: "BETTYE L. (E-mail)" <blanghem@anthonysylvan.com>, "Rowan, Brenda"
<Brenda.Rowan@alcoa.com>, "Gensler, Christina" <Christina.Gensler@alcoa.com>,
"Pistorius, Courtney C." <Courtney.Pistorius@alcoa.com>, "Dan J Hyvl
(E-mail)" <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>, "Doris (E-mail)" <muleman1@earthlink.net>,
"Jan (E-mail)" <janmcdonald@earthlink.net>, "Jennifer (E-mail)"
<jhefti1528@aol.com>, "Frei, Laura (ISC at Alcoa)" <Laura.Frei@alcoa.com>,
"S-Y RANCH (E-mail)" <SYRANCH@JUNO.COM>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: [Fwd: Puppies 4 Sale]

A store owner was tacking a sign above his door
that read "Puppies for Sale."

The signs have a way of attracting children.
Soon a little boy appeared at the sign and asked, "How much are you gonna
sell
those puppies for?".

The store owner replied, "Anywhere from $30-$50."
The little boy reached into his pocket and pulled out some change.
"I have $2.37, can I look at them?"

The store owner smiled and whistled.* Out of the kennel came his dog
named Lady, running down the aisle of his store followed by five little
puppies.* One puppy was lagging considerably behind.

Immediately the little boy singled out the lagging, limping puppy.* He
asked "What's wrong with that little dog?"

The man explained that when the puppy was born the vet said that
this puppy had a bad hip socket and would limp for the rest of his life.

The little boy got really excited and said, "That's the puppy I want to
buy!"

The man replied "No, you don't want to buy that little dog. If you
really want him, I'll give him to you." The little boy got upset. He
looked straight into the man's eyes and said "I don't want you to give him
to
me.
He is worth every bit as much as the other dogs and I'll pay the full
price.* In fact I will give you $2.37 now and 50 cents every month until I
have him paid for."

The man countered, "You really don't want to buy this puppy son.
He is never gonna be able to run, jump and play like other puppies."
The little boy reached down and rolled up his pant leg to reveal a
badly twisted, crippled left leg supported by a big metal brace.* He
looked up at the man and said, "Well, I don't run so well myself and the
little puppy will need someone who understands."

The man was now biting his bottom lip.* Tears welled up in his
eyes....He smiled and said, "Son, I hope and pray that each and every one
of

these puppies will have an owner such as you."

IN LIFE, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO YOU ARE, BUT WHETHER SOMEONE
APPRECIATES YOU FOR WHAT YOU ARE, ACCEPTS YOU AND LOVES YOU
UNCONDITIONALLY.

A REAL FRIEND IS ONE WHO WALKS IN WHEN THE REST OF THE WORLD WALKS AWAY.

SEND THIS TO ALL THE PEOPLE IN YOUR LIFE YOU CONSIDER TO BE SPECIAL.

File item 2 original document name: Not specified
File item 2 document type: PCDATA
File item 2 size (bytes): 2540


Notice No. 01-86
March 8, 2001

TO:
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff
Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
MARGIN RATE CHANGE FOR BACK MONTH PALLADIUM FUTURES CONTRACTS

Effective Date:  Wednesday, March 14, 2001 (close of business).
Futures Contract: Palladium Futures.
Contract Months: All Months Subsequent to the March 2001 Contract Month (The
Margin For the March 2001 Contract, $50,000, Will Not Be Affected By This
Rate Change).
Rate Change:

NYMEX Division Margins for Palladium Back Month Futures Contracts
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):  Old:  $50,000  New:  $5,000
Member Customer (Initial Margin):  Old:  $55,000  New:  $5,500
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):  Old:  $67,500  New:  $6,750

Current systems calculate the margin requirement for spread positions by
first determining the "Scan Risk" and then multiplying the number of spreads
by a rate set by the Exchange.  Scan Risk is determined by netting the
outright margin required for each leg of a spread.  Note the outright margin
level required for the March 2001 contract, and all subsequent contracts
differ.  Spreading between differently margined contracts results in a higher
spread margin than between equally margined contracts.  Below is provided an
example where the legs of a spread are margined differently.

Example at Clearing Member Rates
A spread consisting of one leg in the March 2001 contract and another in the
April 2001 contract (or any subsequent month) will have its requirement (at
the clearing member rates) calculated at $45,500 starting on Wednesday, March
14, 2001.

One Long March 2001 PA   (1 * $50,000) =    $50,000
One Short April 2001 PA   (1 * $5,000) =   -$5,000
Net Scan Risk    ($50,000-$5,000)=    $45,000
Spread Rate    (1* $500) =   +$500
Total Requirement            =    $45,500
Summary of NYMEX Division Margins on Palladium Futures Spreads
All Spreads With One Leg in the March 2001 Contract
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin): $45,500
Member Customer (Initial Margin): $50,050
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin): $61,425

Spreads Between All Contract Months Subsequent To the March 2001 Contract

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin): $ 300
Member Customer (Initial Margin): $ 330
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin): $ 405

Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Palladium Futures Contract.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-86)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Didn't you say mapquest said it takes around 6 hrs to get to Houston from
Corpus
Dickhead?


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/28/2001
11:27 AM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 04/27/2001 11:53:15 AM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - April 2001

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Michael Terraso
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: April 2001
Report Total: $4,444.28
Amount Due Employee: $4,444.28

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


I have an appt. tomorrow at 1 that shouldn't take long.


Hey guys.  I'm cleaning up my emails and I don't know if this was ever
addressed.

Comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2000 05:50
PM ---------------------------

Scott Goodell@ENRON
03/14/2000 07:24 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

Doug Kinney would be the first person to start with.

Chris Germany@ECT
03/14/2000 07:07 AM
To: Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

My sources tell me this means NIMO will continue to assign CES CNG capacity
unless CES can prove they have primary firm to NIMO.  What I'm not sure of is
will NIMO start assigning CES the upstream Tetco capacity.

Scott, who at CES worked with NIMO on the capacity elections?

Molly LaFuze
03/10/2000 02:37 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

Does this affect us?  If so, how?  Thanks Chris.

---------------------- Forwarded by Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000 02:33
PM ---------------------------

hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/10/2000 07:58:31 AM
To: " - *molly.lafuze@enron.com" <molly.lafuze@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

Hi Molly,

I don't know if this will effect Enron or not - I don't even know if Columbia
Energy had any firm capacity off of CNG released through NIMO, but just in
case, I though you might like to know about this.

Sorry I am not much of a help here.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Heidi Boyd/CES/ColumbiaGas on 03/10/2000
08:55 AM ---------------------------

bartlettd2@NiagaraMohawk.com on 03/10/2000 08:35:36 AM
Please respond to bartlettd2@NiagaraMohawk.com

To: rourkec@NiagaraMohawk.com, mimasd@NiagaraMohawk.com, kperry@utilicorp.com,
ehaley@UtiliCorp.com, rbelak@txuenergy.com, ahunt@txuenergy.com,
toddlou@mirabitofuel.com, drusso@superior.net, mcasas@statoilenergy.com,
porterr@selectenergy.com, guginda@selectenergy.com, dgordon@nge.com,
dstreed@naenergy.com, danchakr@nmenergy.com, lpohlman@nfrinc.com,
NAU87@aol.com, NAU87@aol.com, mhogan@naecyork.com, dgilbert@naecyork.com,
Nattygas@aol.com, jbarker@enron.com, lepcorp@localnet.com,
mking@energetix.net,
end.nat@cwix.com, tom@empirenatgas.com, josh@econnergy.com,
saulh@econnergy.com, mfvolkman@duke-energy.com, Kelly.Heine@mcnenergy.com,
Heidi Boyd/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, ddepetris@hess.com,
lross@allenergy.com, rmiller2@AGWAY.COM, mpitonzo@agway.com,
dlstilwell@agfdirectgas.com
cc: baileyj@NiagaraMohawk.com

Subject: Continuation of Assignment of Capacity

March 10, 2000

SENT VIA FAX, E-MAIL & WEBSITE

NOTICE TO ALL MARKETERS PARTICIPATING IN BALANCED AGGREGATION:

In accordance with P.S.C. No. 218 Gas Tariff, Leaf No. 184.2, Niagara Mohawk
will continue to assign CNG capacity unless a final determination in the gas
rate case precludes Niagara Mohawk from such assignment.

If you filed an Affidavit of Firm Transportation Capacity with Niagara Mohawk
last fall and the contract number for the capacity is still valid, Niagara
Mohawk will continue to honor that contract and will not release CNG capacity
to
you.  However, if the contract has expired, you must either re-submit an
Affidavit with a valid contract number or Niagara Mohawk will assign CNG
capacity to you.   The Affidavits are due Niagara Mohawk by the 25th of March,
2000.  Capacity will be assigned the week of March 20th for the month of
April.

If you have any questions, please call Dennis Bartlett at 315-460-4042 or me
at
315-460-4041.  Thank you.

                                   Janice Bailey
                                   Manager Transportation Services
                                   Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	Jenny's Happy Hour

Date:		4/18/2001
Time:		5:30 PM - 7:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Please see attached. Have a good weekend.

Seabron

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com

 - 01-03-09-SA Draft outline for principles paper.doc


Are you tired of feeling over weight and sluggish?
Shave off 8-10 INCHES OF UGLY FAT IN ONE HOUR *Guaranteed*!!!Breakthrough technology helps you **Lose INCHES NOW**,
Tightens Skin, Cleanses and Detoxifies your System. The heavier you are, the more you will lose.
If you are 20 pounds or more overweight, you should
EXPECT to lose 8 or more inches of Fat!!!Women lose inches from their arms and thighs
Men lose inches in their belly area!!!CLICK HERE to melt away inches NOW!

Please click here to be excluded from further communication


you have to bring your own

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:54 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

I didn't know there was a bar upstairs too


We received the following executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreements:

Conexant Systems - 9/28/01
Fresh Express Incorporated - 9/27/01
Mississippi Delta Energy Agency, Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission of the City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, and Public Service Commission of Yazoo City of the City Yazoo City, Mississippi - 5/1/01
XERS INC d/b/a Xcel Energy - 10/4/01
City of Mesa, Arizona - 9/5/01
International Rectifier Corporation - 9/20/01
North Carolina Power Holdings, LLC - 7/12/01

A copy of each will be scanned into Livelink.


Ken,

Your decision to return your separation package to the company you built was a meaningful gesture to all employees.  Having been here at Enron for seven years, I know you must be terribly disappointed with the recent events.  This move was a very classy one.  Thanks!

Rob


thanx for voice mail.

the marked up letter, along with cc of the contract, is on front left corner
of my desk (as viewed from chair).

attached is draft of response letter - needs to be revised to pick up above
comments.  also, per our conversation, our understanding is that this letter
was to go out under ben's signature.

regards.  scott.


Put me on the 11:50 flight and let's see if we can do dinner at 7:00 rather
8:00.  Thanks, Mark


Real Time Traders,

Morrow Power wants to take their unit to the market to get some run time before they begin selling Firm energy. So I'd like the Real Time group to sell the unit at the best price in the hourly market.

I've already bought gas for Friday and Saturday operations. I expect Sunday to be weak to not run the unit on Sunday. I would expect to be back in the market on  Monday.

To sell the unit buy a BPA wheel using the accounts on the scheduling sheet. The variable price at the bottom is actual breakeven price.

To start the unit call PGE at the control room number and give them an hour to get the unit online before you sell. It takes 46 minutes to get the unit from cold start to full load and online.

Also, I've bought reserves from BPA to make these schedules firm for the hour.

I'll be out this afternoon and tomorrow and Stan will be standing in for me. I'll be available on my cell phone for any questions.

Les


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Wednesday, November  28, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Tuesday, November  27, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Region     Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (mmBtu)	Hub Name
 LOUISIANA
    ANR SE	          $2.0900	          $1.6200	          $1.8653	+    .0773	         335,000	American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool
    Columbia Onshore	          $2.0000	          $1.5950	          $1.7426>	+    .0098	         289,800	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool
    Henry Hub	          $2.0700	          $1.6500	          $1.8990	+    .0821	       1,259,500	Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana
    NGPL LA	          $2.1700	          $1.6300	          $1.9199	+    .1225	         265,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool
    Tenn 500L	          $2.0500	          $1.4800	          $1.8412	+    .2200	         214,500	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool
    Tenn 800L	          $2.0500	          $1.4700	          $1.7692	+    .1305	         221,300	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool
    TETCO ELA	          $2.0000	          $1.6100	          $1.8331	+    .1944	         250,700	Texas Eastern - East LA
    TETCO WLA	          $2.1250	          $1.5500	          $1.8223	+    .2301	         211,800	Texas Eastern - West LA
    Transco 65	          $1.9700	          $1.6200	          $1.8037	+    .0136	         145,500	Transco - Station 65
    Trunkline ELA	          $2.0200	          $1.4600	          $1.8193	+    .1175	         138,500	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool
    TxGas SL	          $1.9800	          $1.6200	          $1.8437	+    .0955	         374,400	Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool
 MIDCONTINENT
    MichCon, citygate	          $2.5000	          $1.9750	          $2.3028	+    .2782	         270,200	Michigan Consolidated
    NGPL Midcont	          $2.2600	          $1.7700	          $2.1324	+    .3366	         157,700	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool
    NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $2.4700	          $1.8400	          $2.1943	+    .2759	       1,146,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate
    NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $2.4800	          $1.8550	          $2.2151	+    .2344	         237,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate
    NNG Demarcation	          $2.4600	          $2.2000	          $2.3617	+    .2849	         234,800	Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool
 NORTHEAST
    Columbia TCO	          $2.1000	          $1.6000	          $1.8440	+    .1063	         710,500	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool
    Dominion So.Point	          $2.2300	          $1.6000	          $1.9018	+    .1479	         243,400	Dominion - South Point
    TETCO M3	          $2.6000	          $1.7425	          $2.1459	+    .2367	         218,900	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone
    Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $2.7500	          $1.7600	          $2.1603	+    .0924	         130,200	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)
 WEST
    El Paso non-Bondad	          $2.3800	          $2.1800	          $2.3038	+    .3327	         159,000	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool
    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $2.4650	          $2.3500	          $2.4238	+    .2272	         117,600	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.
    Opal	          $2.3000	          $2.0500	          $2.1438	+    .2545	          75,800	Opal
    PG?Citygate	          $2.7200	          $2.4500	          $2.6311	+    .3528	         161,500	PG?- Citygate
    SoCal Border	          $2.6000	          $2.3500	          $2.4317	+    .3114	         308,400	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)
 WEST TEXAS
    El Paso - Keystone	          $2.4100	          $2.1750	          $2.3286	+    .3599	         396,000	El Paso - Keystone Pool
    Waha	          $2.4150	          $1.9000	          $2.3326	+    .3120	         284,000	Waha Hub - West Texas

                                                                                Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


----- Forwarded by Vanessa Bob/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001 10:43 AM -----

	Calendar Entry

Brief description:
Date:
Time:

9:00-10:00 (EB 15C1) Meeting on PRC Communication & Training - Yowman, Cash,
Corteselli, Karen Moore, Karen Denne, Gerry Gibson
04/16/2001
09:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Detailed description:

_________________________________________________________________________
Chairperson: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron
Sent by: Vanessa Bob/Corp/Enron


Shelley,

I'm working with Kevin Howard on the Revolver and I'm looking at the 2002 Transwestern Operating Plan.
I'm trying to isolated the "cash items" in Operating Expenses.
Undering Operating Expenses, there is a line item called "Fuel Used in Operations" that is credited against operating expenses.  Is that amount collected in cash on a monthy basis or is it accrued?

Thanks,
Travis Winfrey
Enron Global Finance
713-345-8404


Kay:

Can you send over signed copies of the Assignment and Assumption Agreements
and the Bills of Sale?  I do not have signed copies.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 8:51 AM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: Re: CA Energy Development

Sounds fine.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 05/07/2001 03:49:07 PM

To:   "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject:  CA Energy Development

Kay:

George Kutzschbach of Fulbright called this afternoon to request copies of
the executed Assignment and Assumption Agreements and Bills of Sale for the
turbine/transformer transaction between ENA and Sweetgum Energy LP.  George
has unsigned copies of these documents.  Our closing volumes also contain
only unsigned copies of these documents.

George is asking for the documents with respect to both the turbines and
the
transformer, but is needing them specifically for the transformer.
Apparently, CA-II is planning to sell the transformer, and he is gathering
up the documents that would show title to the transformer in CA-II.

I have reviewed the documents, and do not see any reason why we should not
deliver them.  Can you provide signed copies of these documents?   Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


In order to expedite the speed of network response in the days when we had
hubs instead of switches IT/Spohn set up the cabling between my computer and
Mark Fisher's computer and the network servers so they didn't go through the
hub like they did for all other users.    In the current rewiring of the
building will Mark and I be changed to a cabling configuration more typical
of all other users down here?   This info will help us do limited elimination
of causes for network problems before we call IT with future problems.


Attached is the final version of the product long description highlighting a
few changes. Let me know if you approve.
Thanks
jr

From: Sara Shackleton on 03/29/2001 10:07 AM
To: William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Musch/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: online GTC's for the BOFC day/seasonal financial "swaps"

All:

Attached are the two (2) final version GTC's.  The legal terminology is
identical for each product.  However, Stuart needs to provide a title for
each product which will also appear in the Paragraph 1.

The former Paragraph 2 has been deleted (it contained the "confirmation
terms") and the remaining paragraphs renumbered.

Justin:  Will you circulate the revised long description (since your
conversation with Stuart yesterday afternoon)?  Also, will you let us all
know when we are competely done?

Please call with comments as soon as possible.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


FYI:  We have several "Total" agreements.  I don't know the relationship.
Are these commodities global?   SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/06/99 09:00
AM ---------------------------

John J Shoobridge@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/05/99 05:20 PM
To: Patricia Cini@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico
Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gabriela
Aguilar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rodolfo
Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Total's Master Swap Agreement

Pat,

I have faxed to you the financial statements of  Total Austral S.A..

We are potentially entering into a MSA with this customer. The first
transaction we are thinking about is a financial Swap to hedge their
Propane-Butane production in Caadon Alfa according to the following details:

1. Swap      Prices     Prices
SWAP (cents/ gallon) - Bid	1 year	6 months
Propane	35 3/4 	38 3/4
Butane	40 3/4	43 1/2

2. Put Option
Put Option (cents/gallon)	1 year - Premium	1 year - Strike	6 months - Premium	6 months - Strike
Propane 	2.5	32 3/4	2	35 3/4
Butane	3.0	37 3/4	2 3/8	42

Propane
Volume: 45.000 metric tons.
Starting date: Nov 1
Butane:
Volume: 19.000 metric tons.
Starting date: Nov 1

Sara: Would you please start drafting an MSA with Total Austral S.A.? Please
let me know if you need any aditional information.

Regards

John Shoobridge


DICTATION DRAFT FROM GREG PORTER

I just spoke with Georgetta Baker, lawyer for SoCalGas, and Rick Miles, FERC's ADR group.  We discussed the possibility of mediation based upon both parties representing in pleadings filed in Docket No. RP01-620 (TW Complaint) that both companies were interested in alternate dispute resolution (ADR).  After discussing the various types of ADR, we agreed to begin with mediation.  Rick Miles will be the mediator.

The mediation process that was discussed was an evolutionary one whereby parties would meet in a neutral location to discuss resolution (i.e., settlement) of its claims.  Both parties indicated a willingness to settle.  Rick Miles will act as a facilitator.  Mr. Miles' function will be one of moderating discussions and not evaluative.  As the mediation process continues without resolution, Mr. Miles' role will evolve.  Later on, if the parties desire, Mr. Miles offered to bring in a FERC staffer that is a subject matter expert to offer his or her views of each party's case.   Also, if the parties desire, the subject matter expert would indicate how he or she would recommend the Commission rule on the merits.

Initial dates of November 7-8 or November 13-14 were offered as potential dates for the first meeting.  A neutral location needs to be agreed upon.  Once additional information is learned, I will advise.  In the meantime, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.


While our established schedules of Tuesday and Friday DPR's would have us reporting tomorrow's activity on Monday, we will change that for month end.  Please email the January 31st DPR information for your respective groups to my attention by noon on Friday.  You should use the same spreadsheet format used for the 1/29/02 DPR.  All p&l and PRMA numbers should be in $'000's.

Starting in February, you will be able to export the data, as opposed to using the spreadsheets.

Thanks,

Chris Abel
Manager, Risk Controls
Global Risk Operations
chris.abel@enron.com <mailto:chris.abel@enron.com>
713.853.3102


Pam Anderson from Intercontinental Exchange will be giving an ICE presentation
on Tuesday, May 22 in EB 32C2 at 3:00 pm .

Please let me know if you plan on attending.

Thanks,
Rain


State Bar of Texas
Texas Bar CLE

"THE ENRON DEBACLE: NAVIGATING THE PERFECT STORM", a new course by Texas Bar CLE, will be presented March 1, 2002, at the Radisson Astrodome Hotel in Houston.

Course directors Richard Orsinger and Craig Ball are presently recruiting a top-flight faculty for this timely and important program, which promises to examine discovery issues; employees as plaintiffs, defendants, witnesses, and whistleblowers; class actions; shareholder remedies; insurance; the collision of criminal and civil matters; juror focus groups; managing the media; and jury selection in a high profile case. Obviously, many important facts about Enron are yet to be determined, so the program topics will be presented in the hypothetical voice.

Register for  $195 and receive extensive written materials.
MCLE Credit: 6.25 hours (.5 hr. ethics credit)

Please visit http://www.TexasBarCLE.com for more details and registration information.

===============================================================
If you no longer wish to receive occasional emails regarding Texas Bar CLE programs or services, please go to http://www.texasbarcle.com/RemoveFromEmailList.asp and follow the instructions given.  If you have any other questions or comments, please email us at webmaster@texasbarcle.com


Coming Full Circle: A Plausible Future for Power Generation

Speaker:
Amy Oberg
Manager, Competitive Intelligence and Future Foresight
Enron Energy Services

Wednesday, May 30
11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
EB 5C2

To Make a Reservation, Call 3-1941 and Select Option 1.

Lunch will not be provided, but you are welcome to bring your own.

Please inform us ahead of time if you need special accommodations to
participate in this meeting.  Call 3-9390.


Attached is my response to the questionaire related to Learning forums, etc.

-----Original Message-----
From: SloanConsulting@aol.com [mailto:SloanConsulting@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:08 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com; mfkeeth@shellus.com;
gerald.w.mcelvy@exxonmobil.com; dph@swbellnet;
Bob.Peebler@halliburton.com; tina.sivinski@eds.com;
TNTipton@marathonoil.com; bwillia6@us.ibm.com
Cc: bobcasey@uh.edu; pkumar@uh.edu
Subject: Sub Group attachment

I just sent you an e-mail for the sub-group but failed to include the
attachment. Thought it would be helpful if I did!  Happy Thanksgiving.
Lane

 - Energy Community.doc


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Ken Lay- Chairman of the Board@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	VP's and Above- Enron Management Conference List@ENRON
Subject:	2001 Management Conference

During this critical time, it is imperative that our management team remain focused on our business and continue to address the challenges currently facing our company.  For that reason, I have decided to postpone the Enron Management Conference.

The Conference will now be held Friday, February 22 - Saturday, February 23, 2002 at the Westin La Cantera Resort in San Antonio.  While the Saturday meeting allows some Enron executives who cannot be away from the office during business hours to attend the Management Conference for the first time, I also recognize that it requires many of you to forfeit additional personal time on behalf of Enron.  I truly appreciate your sacrifice and I sincerely encourage your attendance.

The new agenda, while still being finalized, will be abbreviated but every bit as informative and worthwhile as previously planned.  We'll be in touch soon with more details.

Regards,
Ken Lay


No thanks necessary.  My pleasure.  Hope that it helped.  What was the gist
of his comments regarding the gas side?

Best,
Jeff

	Rob Bradley
	04/25/2001 03:43 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Gas Bullets

Thanks for all your help with this--glad your attention is focused on it.
Ken was prepared and talked a bit about the gas side at this lunch speech.

Thanks again,

- Rob


As a follow-up to my email regarding the execution of the 12/29/00 ISDA
Master Agreement between Deutsche Bank AG and Enron North America Corp.,
please be further advised:

Effective 6/4/99, Bankers Trust Company was acquired by Deutsche Bank AG.
All financial trading should now be transacted under the above Deutsche Bank
ISDA Master Agreement.  No further financial trading should be done in the
name of Bankers Trust Company, and the 4/16/91 ISDA Interest Rate and
Currency Exchange Agreement with Bankers Trust Company should be inactivated.

All outstanding Bankers Trust Company financial trades were assigned to
Deutsche Bank AG in the ISDA Master Agreement, and all the Bankers Trust
Company trades should be moved to Deutsche Bank.


i  wish.  leaving to return to SF in a little bit.  should be back in town
around 2 PM.

best,
Jeff

	Joseph Alamo
	06/29/2001 12:04 PM

		 To: 9167184@skytel.com, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Friday whereabouts?

JOD - still in Monterey??? didya go to the Acquarium or something??


-----Original Message-----
From: Sudduth, Julia
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:04 AM
To: Misra, Narsimha; Wagner, Joseph; Padron, Juan; Sharfman, Guy;
Santucci, Anna; Moore, Castlen; Kendall, Heath; Hemani, Sanjay;
Dickerson, Lloyd; Raque, Michele; Ring, Richard
Subject: FW: DYN($42/sh)/ENE($7/sh) Merger At Risk. - Latest thoughts
from Simmons & Company

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert.B.Sale@dynegy.com [mailto:Robert.B.Sale@dynegy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:02 AM
Subject: DYN($42/sh)/ENE($7/sh) Merger At Risk. - Latest thoughts from
Simmons & Company

Robert B. Sale III
Dynegy Ventures
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
Houston, TX.  77002
713.767.6110
713.204.6670 cell
----- Forwarded by Robert B Sale/HOU/Dynegy on 11/21/01 08:01 AM -----

                    rzorn@simmonsc
                    o-intl.com            To:     rzorn@simmonsco-intl.com
                                          cc:
                    11/21/01 07:53        Subject:     DYN($42/sh)/ENE($7/sh) Merger At Risk.
                    AM

Our lastest thoughts on the proposed merger....

Ryan Zorn (713) 223-7840

----- Forwarded by Ryan Zorn/SCI on 11/21/01 07:50 AM -----

                    Jeff Dietert
                                         To:     Sales Trading
                    11/21/01 07:42       cc:
                    AM                   Subject:     DYN($42/sh)/ENE
($7/sh) Merger At
                                          Risk.

SUMMARY:  We are reducing our estimated probability that the DYN/ENE merger
is completed to less than 50%/50% based on our belief that ENE's existing
wholesale and retail businesses are having a difficult time maintaining
their volumes and margins.  We have discussed ENE's need to improve counter
party confidence on a number of occasions over the last few weeks, and we
believe counter party confidence deteriorated further based on the
information included in the 10Q, and the strong negative reaction in the
stock and bond markets yesterday.  The tone of our discussions with
competing traders and marketers (representative of ENE's counter
parties--which are critical in maintaining ENE's volumes) is becoming more
negative.  While ENE is continuing to confirm that volumes are improving
since the lows on November 9, our market intelligence is suggesting
improment has stalled.  In addition and probably related, ENE's liquidity
position seems to be continuing to deteriorate despite significant recent
capital infusions.  We are reducing 4Q01 estimates to reflect lower volume
and margin assumptions.  What would get us more comfortable?  ENE 8K
disclosure confirming higher volume and decent margins (ENE has committed
to provide 4Q guidance by early-mid December, and/or a change in the tone
of the counter parties that would suggest they are increasing trading
activities with ENE.

OPINION ON THE STOCKS:
   ENE.  No change in our opinion on ENE--the upside potential is simply
   not worth the downside risk.
   DYN.  DYN is likely to benefit in almost all outcomes.  If our concerns
   about counter party confidence prove to be wrong, the upside associated
   with the accretion in the transaction would likely be huge.  However, we
   sense DYN is getting frustrated by continued restatement of earnings,
   unexpected debt triggers and worse than expected liquidity problems.  If
   the transaction falls apart, DYN would have some transaction costs that
   would negatively impact cash flow in the near-term, but DYN would
   benefit from gaining market share and hiring some of ENE's talent away
   longer term.  A potential downside case for DYN is that DYN retrades the
   deal on recent information, but is forced to reduced its flexibility to
   terminate the transaction through material adverse change
   considerations, this out come would concern us.  We continue to believe
   DYN is a solid long-term holding for investors.  However, we are
   recommending caution with new money, due to our belief that DYN still
   has $5/sh to $7/sh of "deal" premium factored into the current stock
   price which could be at risk if the deal fails.  We do not believe DYN
   has significant accounts receivable exposure to ENE in the event the ENE
   has further liquidity problems (we believe DYN's trading agreement with
   ENE limits exposure to maybe $100 to $150 MM).

COUNTER PARTY INCENTIVES:  ENE identified in its 10Q that transaction
volume (especially long-term transactions) have declined since the 3Q.  If
you are a utility or industrial customer, why enter into a long-term
transaction with ENE?  Why not go directly to DYN or diversify with other
suppliers?  If you are a natural gas or power producer, why create the
account receivable risk?  If you are a counter party, strategically why
would you contribute to the continuation of the ENE machine--to the
ultimate benefit of strengthening another competitor (DYN)?  We believe
that ENE is offering attractive financial incentives (premium purchases
and/or discounted sales) to entice counter parties to trade with them.
However, this would also suggest ENE margins may be getting squeezed.

EPS ESTIMATES (new/old/consensus):
   4Q01-$0.20/0.35/0.42, FY01-$1.55/1.70/1.78, FY02-$1.50/1.50/1.90
   We are reducing expectations for margins in the Wholesale segment from
   9cts/mmbtu to 7cts/mmbtu--negatively impacting 4Q EPS by 10cts/sh.  In
   addition, we expect contributions from Enron Energy Services will be
   lower due to challenges in closing long-term transactions (much of EES's
   earnings are mark-to-market recognition of the value created in
   long-term agreeements) impacting our estimate by 5cts/sh.

*****************************************************************************************************

This e-mail is based on information obtained from sources which Simmons &
Company International believes to be reliable, but Simmons & Company
International does not represent or warrant its accuracy.  The opinions and
estimates contained in this e-mail represent the views of Simmons & Company
as of the date of the e-mail, and may be subject to change without prior
notice.  Simmons & Company International, its partners and/or employees may
have positions in the securities discussed.  Simmons & Company
International may make a market in the securities discussed and may have
served as a financial advisor and/or underwriter to companies discussed.
Simmons & Company International will not be responsible for the consequence
of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained in this e-mail.  This
e-mail is confidential, and may not be reproduced,  in whole or in part,
without the prior written permission of Simmons & Company International.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000
09:50 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Corporate Benefits @ ENRON                           10/12/2000 06:23
PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide employees
cc:
Subject: Open Enrollment 2001

Open Enrollment 2001 is going on now through October 22nd, 5pm CST for
regular full-time and regular part-time employees.  Your 2000 elections will
automatically rollover for 2001, so if you don,t want to make any changes, DO
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!  Annual elections for all Flexible Spending Accounts will
rollover too!  Yes, you heard right ) ALL 2000 ELECTIONS WILL AUTOMATICALLY
ROLLOVER FOR 2001, INCLUDING SPENDING ACCOUNTS!

To make it even more convenient, print your 2001 confirmation statement right
from the web site and you,re finished!  Sound easy?  It is!  Don,t have your
packet?  No problem!  You can access the enrollment 2001 web site and print
your personal worksheet right from your desktop.  Call Benefits at
1-800-332-7979, Option 1, for additional information or assistance.
Confirmation statements will be mailed to your home at the end of October and
final changes for 2001 can be made via the web or IVR from 11/8-11/15.

Logon to WWW.ENRON.BENEFITSNOW.COM today!

QUICK FACTS
? 100% Default for All Current Elections and Spending Accounts ) Don,t Want
to Make a Change?
 Then Do Absolutely Nothing ) Your 2000 annual election will ROLLOVER for
2001!

? $250 Medical Deductible Plan for Employees Residing Outside of a Network
Area

? HMO plans going away )
Coventry Health Care of Iowa (formerly known as Principal Health Care)
Presbyterian Health Plan
HealthNet of Oregon (formerly known as Qual/Med)
Blue Shield of California

? Orthodontia treatment is NOT considered a pre-existing condition under the
Enron Corp. Dental Plan.
 The Plan will coordinate with other coverage based on coordination of
benefit (COB) rules.
 (Contact MetLife at 1-800-492-8588 for specific details and information)

? New Hires who make their 2000 elections by 10/16 will receive their 2001
packets the first week of
 November for enrollment during 11/8-11/15; elections not in by 10/16 will
require a manual enrollment
 for 2000 and 2001 and must be made within 31 days of their hire date

? Provider directories can be accessed directly from the enrollment 2001 web
site or - 1) link directly
 to the providers through the HR/Benefits Intranet Website or 2) go directly
to the source by logging
 on through the web at:

www.cigna.com        www.vsp.com
www.provider.uhc.com/enron     www.merck-medco.com