Thanks for owning the question and sending me your ideas.  I agree that some sort of planned rotation for experienced hires could be beneficial to the company and to the employees.  I have another week or so of living the 2002 budgets, and then I will be able to do other things!  I am saving your note, and will get in touch with you after that to talk about your ideas in more detail.  I am copying my assistant on this note so that she can schedule a time for us to get together.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miralles, Al
Sent:	Friday, October  5, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	Rotation Question

Hi Sally -

I submitted the question at the Networks meeting in regards to employee rotation, and I though I'd drop you a note to expand on my thoughts. Being at Enron for just shy of a year, I quickly learned how frequently people informally move within the company and their business units. I've also noticed that often this is a point of frustration for many managers, and can cause friction and negative energy between business units. Logically, these transfers are typically occur into the "hot" BU's and into the "cold" BU's.

I think a "formal" job rotation program within the support structure could help to minimize some of the above issues, and more importantly could provide a platform for developing, challenging, and retaining our staff. The rotation programs I've seen at my previous employers typically stop at the manager level, and require an employee to stay in a role for one year. After one year, they may submit their preference to remain in their current job which may or may not be accepted by the rotation committee.

I am aware of the success of the rotation process within the analyst program and I would think there may be an opportunity to parlay this to the support platform. I appreciate your feedback on the topic. Thanks and regards.

Al Miralles
EBS Risk Management
Office (713)345-4636
Cell    (713)825-9634


phone number is 403-233-3027 - will be staying at the OMNI 713-871-8181


I have revised the option form consistent (except where noted) with comments
sent by Herman and Lisa, and have attached a redline version.  Herman, I
dealt with your comment regarding the defn of Optionee by tinkering a little
with the 1st paragraph.  I also construed your comment regarding Enron's
right to terminate the option to NOT preclude termination if our counterparty
is in default.  Please confirm that this is acceptable.

Lisa, I did not change the notice info since the first entity will the the
project co, with ENA Legal receiving a copy.

Please advise if you have any comments.

Kay


Richard, Wayne and Roberts

From: Tracie Waligura@RWR on 08/02/2000 10:39 AM

To:   jeffrey.t.hodge@enron.com
cc:   rsander@enron.com
Subject:  Thomasine Pantazis

Jeff - Per our conversation, attached is the resume of Thomasine Pantazis.

(See attached file: thomasine pantazis resume.doc)

Tracie Waligura
Legal Recruiter
24 Greenway Plaza, Suite  1304
Houston, Texas 77046
Toll:        800-364-7979  Ext. 7254
Direct:    713-358-7254
Fax:        713-623-2740
Email:    twaligura@rwr.com
Internet: http://www.rwr.com

 - thomasine pantazis resume.doc


I for one believed the judging to be objective and fair. Clearly, "price
caps" are out of favor. Enron's totally impartial judges, and FERC's
independent analysis, reached  the same (appropriate) conclusion.  As for
fatigues, they are difficult to see, so how can one expect to be evaluated
on  a costume that is visually disadvantaged.

The foundation of  Enron's business is competition. Obviously, the
exceptional wisdom of the independent judges recognized that cycling is a
highly competitive activity. Therefor, a cycling costume reflected the spirit
of Enron and the Halloween competition.

 My suggestion to Mr. Rasmussen for next years competition is that he wear
lycra camouflage.


Hey everyone- hope you are all doing well. I wanted to let you all know that starting Nov 5 I will be at this new address

1808 Octavia Street, #12
SF, CA  94109
415/359-1787

Hope you all have a nice rest of your week and I will talk to you soon

Scottie

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
08:47 PM ---------------------------

Sandeep Kohli@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/17/2000 06:42 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: DPC Memo

Vince,

I am in Houston (rrived Satruday), and will be in office on Monday (though
officially, I am on vacation).  Would like to catch up with you if possible.

It looks like your team will be getting involved in some form on the DPC
side.  I have already made a recommendation to Wade.

I am attaching a small memo that I have addressed to Wade on the DPC position
and possible workout.  This is still a draft and will likely get shared later
with others.  I would love to get your comments on the same.  At the same
time, this also will give you some idea of the problem, in conjunction with
the other Plan presentation I had sent you.

Look forward to touching base with you.

Regards,
Sandeep.


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: daughes@pjm.com [mailto:daughes@pjm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:43 PM
To: bpitre@enron.com; jhartso@enron.com
Cc: drausl@www1.pjm.com; lynchmr@www1.pjm.com
Subject: NOTICE OF PJM OPERATING AGREEMENT BREACH - November 20th
PAYMENT TO PJM IS OVERDUE
Importance: High

> This is your formal notice that PJM now considers your company in breach of
> the PJM Operating Agreement for non-payment of your November 7, 2001 PJM
> invoice by 1 p.m. today. In accordance with the current provisions of Section
> 15.1.3 of PJM's Operating Agreement, you have three business days to rectify
> this breach by making full payment to PJM. If this breach is not rectified by
> the end of PJM's business day on Tuesday, November 27, 2001, PJM will declare
> your company in default and terminate your rights to participate at PJM
> committee meetings, to transact business in PJM's markets, and to receive
> transmission service from PJM. Additionally, all PJM Members will receive a
> list tomorrow of companies that did not pay their invoice for October activity
> on the due date.
>
> If you have any questions regarding this notice or the amount your company
> owes to PJM, please contact Molly Lynch at 610-666-8876 or Lisa Drauschak at
> 610-666-4247.
>
> Suzanne Daugherty
> Controller


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 09:18 AM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	12/18/2000 05:52 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 12/18/00


Dear GISB Members and Interested Industry Participants,

    At the Executive Committee meeting in February, the Executive Committee
created a new subcommittee, the Expedited Data Development (EDD)
Subcommittee.  The EDD Subcommittee has been charged with the development of
the information requirements standards for (1) imbalance netting and trading
and (2) title transfer tracking.   The Executive Committee placed a higher
priority on the imbalance netting and trading topic.

    The subcommittee's first meeting is scheduled on March 13 and 14 in
Houston, hosted at the Dynegy offices, to be held from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
 Please join me in thanking Ms. Hess of Enron Gas Pipeline Group and Ms.
Munson of Altra Energy Technologies for volunteering their time to lead this
effort.

    An agenda and work papers will be posted on the GISB Home Page shortly
for this first meeting.  The first meeting will address imbalance netting and
trading ONLY.

    If you or other representatives of your company would like your email
address to be maintained on an email distribution list for this subcommittee,
please forward your name, email address, phone and fax to the GISB office.
GISB follows a privacy policy and will not provide your email address to
other groups for their use.

    We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

Best Regards,
Rae McQuade

(If you are on this general notices distribution list and would like to be
removed, please email such request to the GISB office and your email address
will be removed. If you would like to add other participants from your
company to this distribution list, please also email such request to the GISB
office.  GISB follows a privacy policy and will not provide your email
address to other groups for their use.)

 - am000314.PDF


What a happy coincidence about the book!  We'll have to share thoughts when
we're done reading it.  The New York Times gave it a rave review, which made
it so popular it was sold out for quite some time.

I've had to scold our buddy up there in the frozen north.  He's having to
work on a master physical/financial netting agreement for a Canadian
counterparty and has been calling me to ask basic ISDA questions that were
covered in my class.  I told him if you two were paying more attention
instead of clowning around so much...oh well, good thing I can't get him with
a ruler up in Canada!

Take care, and I'll look forward to chatting with you...


Start Date: 2/22/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022221.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 21 / Preferred:   0.51 / Final:   0.48)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Kathy,

I have prepared  the Canadian draft for your review.   I hope to send same to
you today, I am waiting on my credit department re credit terms.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


mark:
Here is what we talked about last Friday with Credit.
Carol


People that bred Tommy


Julian Rose
15 Greenwich Hills Drive
Greenwich, CT 06831

Phone:  (203) 531 0691 (h)


Any ideas?  These guys (John & Jere) just can't get it together.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000
05:14 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
05/19/2000 05:12 PM
To: Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, C John Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Potential Candidates for Reliable Reserves

Jere, I understand your frustruation and I am very motived to prove out the
insurance product; however, I do think John has a legitimate concern
(especially given the fact that this group blew up very publically internally
and externally and we need to repair the image internally and market
perception externally in order to be successful in the future) surrounding
multiple groups covering the same customers with different stories.  You guys
could not work this out - so I offered a compromise position which involved a
well coordinated test marketing iniative (this was agreed to by you and John
at the offsite):
 a) the insurance group was to identify the initial 5 to 10 target customer
list that ENA would pitch the product to which should give us a determination
if this is a commercially viable product;
 b) John and Scott would facilitate the contact with the customers to ensure
a consistent face and story with the customers - if you guys can sit down and
come up with an alternative that works for you - great; regardless, John had
promised me that he would do everything necessary to facilitate and promote
this capability to these customers ASAP;
 c) both groups would put a deal team together and get out there ASAP;
 d) if the test marketing of the product is successful; I agree that we need
to sit down and discuss how we formally allign the interests of these groups.

This appears to be a reasonable and logical approach on an interim basis.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000
04:30 PM ---------------------------

Jere C Overdyke
05/18/2000 08:50 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Potential Candidates for Reliable Reserves

We are heading down the road of a gate keeper approach which has proven very
inefficient at Enron in the past.    Our group has already canceled a meeting
with the CFO of Vintage because of this approach.  Rerarding  industry
relationships, George Carrick, Mark Tawney and I have extensive relationships
throughout the upstream sector, know the decision makers and can set up our
own meetings, all in coordination with the upstream group.  At this time I am
waiting on John's group to set up our meetings.  Seems very inefficient.

The main objective is to determine if there is demand for the product.  I
will continue to coordinate through John but we need to meet to clarify roles
and responsibilities of all parties - how will deals be structured, who will
price, who will negotiate transaction, etc.


I have discussed the timing for correction publication issue with our trading
desk.  Most price source publications for paper and pulp products are
published only on a monthly basis and therefore the 40 days is needed in
order to utilize the correction concept, which we do want to be able to
utilize.  Thus, we are not in agreement with your proposed amendment.  Please
call if you would like to discuss.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Thank you for updating your profile information.
Updates as of 5/20/2001 are reflected below.
Please review your information:
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Account Nickname: snealtd1
Email Address: scott.neal@enron.com
Second Email Address: sneal12@mindspring.com
Wireless Email Address:  N/A

Documents regarding your account will be sent as follows:
~*~ Statements: by US Mail
~*~ Trade Confirmations: by US Mail
For all documents that you have agreed to receive online,
we will send you an email notification when a new document is available.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

You can update this information at any time at
http://www.tdwaterhouse.com
in "My Info" under "My Account".

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Questions? Email us at eservices@tdwaterhouse.com
Please do not send sensitive information as email is not secure.
Thank you for investing with TD Waterhouse.


We need to pursue now.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/11/99 11:35
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Patricia Cini                           08/11/99 10:00 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rodolfo Freyre@Enron
Subject: Empresa Distribuidora de Energia Norte

Here is the credit worksheet that I had originally sent on 6/28/99.  Susan
Bailey was working on this file when Argentina put the ISDA on hold.
They are ready to move forward with this ISDA again.

Regards,

Pat

---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia Cini/HOU/ECT on 08/11/99 09:59
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Patricia Cini                           08/10/99 06:45 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rodolfo Freyre@Enron
Subject: Empresa Distribuidora de Energia Norte

Sara-

We had started an ISDA with this counterparty that was put on hold, but is
now back on again.

The main issue was the change in ownership, which should be if AES Corp.
fails to own 56.33% of Empresa Distribuidora de Energia Norte.

Let me know if there were any other issues with preparing this document.

Thank you,

Pat


We have received the executed Mutual Nondisclosure Agreement dated 10/31/00
between the referenced counterparty and Enron Net Works LLC and EnronOnline,
LLC.  Copies will be distributed.


Jennifer Redwine
30 Shoreline Court
Richmond, CA 94804
jredwine@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Redwine


Due to the release of schedule C for ENA and EES, the attached spreadsheet provides the trading p&l without prudency and the associated Daily Loss Limit notifications.  Additionally, the spreadsheet reflects the net effect on the Total Trading line.  If the Corp. Var remains at $100mm, then a Daily Loss Limit notification would be sent out.  However, the current opinion is that the Corp. Var is $150mm, including discretionary Var, which eliminates the notification.

Please let me know if you have any quetions.

Thanks,
Chris Abel


Tana:  Please see Sami's message below.  Is there something you can send?  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/05/2000
04:15 PM ---------------------------

Sami Arap@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/05/2000 09:18 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Sara;

Are you also involved in EnronOnLine ?  I only got a copy of an EOL summary
but would like to receive a more detailed memo about such business.  Can you
provide me with any additional materials ?!

Thanks,

Sami

Sara Shackleton@ECT
05/04/2000 04:29 PM
To: Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Andrea Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Hi, Sami!  Sorry we missed the call yesterday.  I just wanted to update you
on some of the financial trading issues in Brazil (and I have added you to
the working group list).  I am going to finalize our "swap matrix" for
Brazil.  On the physical trading side, I had asked a physical trading lawyer
to call you and am wondering if Elizabeth Sager ever called or emailed.
Please let me know.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 05/04/2000 01:21:59 PM
To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc: Andrea.Bertone@enron.com, Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com,
Rick.Hopkinson@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br, Krishna@tozzini.com.br
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your message below. Please find attached hereto free
translation into English of new foreign investor's regulations in Brazil. We
are preparing a memo to you in connection with such new regulations and are
finalizing the matrix prepared last year. We will send them to you shortly.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 05/04 12:08 pm >>>

AFAC and Marcelo:  I hope this message finds you both well.  I would like to
finalize the matrix which was prepared last year so that we can create a
"baseline" for future updates.  Please feel free to date the matrix as of
December, 1999, if you wish.  Please forward any recent changes to me for
comment  and I will respond immediately.  Then we can move on to other things!
Thanks for your help and attention to this mattter.  Regards.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
10:34
AM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 03/13/2000 06:27:26 PM

To:   Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc:   Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br
Subject:  Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your E-mail below. We will be reflecting the new changes in the
regulations in the chart and will be sending it to your review as soon as
possible.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 03/13 2:29 pm >>>

Greetings to you both!  It has been awhile since we last spoke.  I would like
to
finalize the matrix which we have been discussing since the latter part of
1999.
Although we were awaiting new Central Bank regulations, I am beginning to
think
that the Central Bank revisions will not impact the matrix except with respect
to transactions which may be entered into by entities that are the subject of
the Central Bank regulations.  Please let me know whether or not you agree or
can offer any suggestions.  Thanks and regards.  Sara

 - Res2689a.doc
 - Ins325a.doc


We made assumptions for all available capacity to be sold in the 2002 Plan at various rates.  The only available capacity we did not make an assumption for was the 40,000/d in June for the Red Rock expansion.

Below are the assumptions:

Un-subscribed Contracts: (Assumed at following rates)
East of Thoreau to East of Thoreau:

24198		Sid Richardson (ROFR)	 6/1/95	 5/31/02	35,714		0.05
25374		KN Processing		 6/1/98	 Mo./Mo.	23,000		0.05
27291		Duke		             8/1/00	 7/31/02	20,000		0.02
27377		Agave		    		 3/1/01	 2/28/02	10,000		0.02
27579		Duke		   		 5/1/01	 5/31/02	20,000		0.02

East of Thoreau to West of Thoreau:

25841		PG&E Trading 		2/1/00	 10/31/02	40,000		0.08
26511		PG&E Trading	     11/1/99	 10/31/02	21,000		0.12
27340		OneOk	          	      2/1/01	  1/31/02	10,000		0.12
27340		OneOk	          	      2/1/01	  1/31/02	10,000		0.08

Thoreau to West of Thoreau:

27583		North Star Steel	      5/1/01	  5/31/02	 1,300		0.04

Ignacio to Blanco

27342		Sempra		      1/1/01	 12/31/01	30,000		0.02

S. Ignacio to Blanco:
N/A		Unsubscribed		July		Sept		29,000		0.04

				Volume	Rate
EOT to WOT			14,000	0.08
4/1/02-10/31/02
Blanco to Thoreau
1/1/02-10/31/02		32,500	0.05
11/1/02-12/31/02		11,000	0.05

Red Rock Expansion:
Assumed 40,000/day in June not sold.

-----Original Message-----
From: Geaccone, Tracy
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:09 AM
To: Moore, Jan; Donoho, Lindy
Subject: FW:
Importance: High

Can you help me with this one?

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 9:49 PM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:

Do you know how much capacity is available to sell in the plan for 2002 and is not sold, ie how much capacity is not being utilized?  TW of course.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Our regular Monday staff meetings will now start at 1:30 p.m. but will still be held in EB13C2.


So,  I think Jason is going to go to the game now.  So, I need to buy you and
Mom tickets.  Before I do that, do you have any friends at UH or UT (maybe
Mr. Hamilton) that might have tickets.  If not, we can get some through a
ticket broker or through a scalper the day of the game (probably the better
way).

Let me know

-E


The following is a memo from accounting containing some new accounting codes
you should be aware of.  I should warn you that your timesheets must be
approved by your supervisor; therefore, Code 5604 should not be used.

It has come to our attention recently that many  of you have been turning
in timesheets that specify large amounts of  "Miscellaneous? Unproductive
Time" (Code 5309). To our  department, unproductive time isn't a problem.
What is a problem, however, is  not knowing exactly what you are doing
during your unproductive time.  Attached below is a sheet specifying a
tentative extended job code list based  on our observations of employee
activities.

The list will allow you  to specify with a fair amount of precision what
you are doing during your  unproductive time. Please begin using this job
code list immediately and let  us know about any difficulties you
encounter.

Thank  you,
Accounting.
Attached: Extended Job Code List
Code Number  Explanation
---------- -----------
5316 Useless Meeting
5317  Obstructing Communications at Meeting
5318 Trying to Sound Knowledgeable  While in Meeting
5319 Waiting for Break
5320 Waiting for Lunch
5321  Waiting for End of Day
5322 Vicious Verbal Attacks Directed at  Coworker
5323 Vicious Verbal Attacks Directed at Coworker While Coworker is  Not
Present
5393 Covering for Incompetence of Coworker Friend
5394  Blaming Incompetence of Coworker Who is Not a Friend
5400 Trying to Explain  Concept to Coworker Who is Not Interested in
Learning
5401 Trying to  Explain Concept to Coworker Who is Stupid
5402 Trying to Explain Concept to  Coworker Who Hates You
5481 Buying Snack
5482 Eating Snack
5500 Filling  Out Timesheet
5501 Inventing Timesheet Entries
5502 Waiting for Something  to Happen
5503 Scratching Yourself
5504 Sleeping
5510 Feeling  Bored
5600 Complaining About Lousy Job
5601 Complaining About Low  Pay
5602 Complaining About Long Hours
5603 Complaining About Coworker (See  Codes #5322 & #5323)
5604 Complaining About Boss
5605 Complaining  About Personal Problems
5640 Miscellaneous Unproductive Complaining
5701  Not Actually Present At Job
5702 Suffering From Eight-Hour Flu
6102  Ordering Out
6103 Waiting for Food Delivery to Arrive
6104 Taking It Easy  While Digesting Food
6200 Using Company Resources for Personal Profit
6201  Stealing Company Goods
6202 Making Excuses After Accidentally Destroying  Company Files
6203 Using Company Phone to Make Long-Distance Personal  Calls
6204 Using Company Phone to Make Long-Distance Personal Calls to  Sell
Stolen Company Goods
6205 Hiding from Boss
6206 Gossip
6207  Planning a Social Event (e.g. vacation, wedding, etc.)
6210 Feeling Sorry For  Yourself
6211 Updating Resume
6212 Faxing Resume to Another  Employer/Headhunter
6213 Out of Office on Interview
6221 Pretending to  Work While Boss Is Watching
6222 Pretending to Enjoy Your Job
6223  Pretending You Like Coworker
6224 Pretending You Like Important People When  in Reality They are Jerks
6238 Miscellaneous Unproductive Fantasizing
6350  Playing Pranks on the New Guy/Girl
6601 Running your own Business on Company  Time (See Code #6603)
6602 Complaining
6603 Writing a Book on Company  Time
6611 Staring Into Space
6612 Staring At Computer Screen
6615  Transcendental Meditation
7281 Extended Visit to the Bathroom (at least 10  minutes)
7400 Talking With Divorce Lawyer on Phone
7401 Talking With  Plumber on Phone
7402 Talking With Dentist on Phone
7403 Talking With  Doctor on Phone
7404 Talking With Masseuse on Phone
7405 Talking With  House Painter on Phone
7406 Talking With Personal Therapist on Phone
7419  Talking With Miscellaneous Paid Professional on Phone
7931 Asking Coworker to  Aid You in an Illicit Activity
8000 Recreational Drug Use
8001  Non-recreational Drug Use
8002 Liquid Lunch
8100 Reading e-mail
8101  Distributing humorous e-mails


HEY!  I just got your email this morning... crazy life and work... I am
leaving for Austin this afternoon for my friend Amy's wedding and will be
back Sunday... I would love to get together sometime soon with you... I miss
you!  Let me know what your schedule looks like.

Love you,

Jen

>From: Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
>To: jkbowles@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: Tomorrow...
>Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:13:04 -0600
>
>
>Any interest in doing something tonight?
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.

Sender:  colio@houston.rr.com
Date:  Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:07:26 -0500
Subject:  Logitech Video E-Mail
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound EXE Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'vmailvid.exe'.

If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release.  If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.

North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)

Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.


http://my.servepics.com/pictures/2001/09-14_Ol_McDonald_Farm/page00.htm

==================================================================?EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84vNF.a9iVHm Or send an email To: brcc.yf-unsubscribe@topica.com?This email was sent to: dfarmer@enron.com?T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==================================================================


Sorry I missed your call last night, I had to pick-up my car.  Any interest in exercise?.... Give me a call if you can make time.

Jon

PS.  Nice articles in the Wall Street Journal and NY Times


[IMAGE]  The #1 customer management magazine focused on the[IMAGE]energy industry is accepting advertising space reservations for their highly anticipated "Executive Guide to Providers of Customer Management Services" issue.  Gain added exposure for your marketing message by being a part of this once-a-year issue, which will be kept as a reference for buying decisions throughout the year.  Now is your chance to take part in the evolution of  Fortnightly's Energy Customer Management. What started out as single-topic supplements three years ago has evolved into six stand-alone issues that provide the business and technology intelligence needed to create strategies for effective customer management for energy companies.  And thanks to the hard work of our circulation staff, over 17,000 professionals with specific interest in this field will be receiving it, along with your advertising message.  Bonus Distribution In addition to reaching our respected audience this single issue will receive added distribution at the following industry events:  NRECA Annual Meeting - March 6-13 GasMart/Power 2002 - March 19-21 e-ProCom - March 19-21 NEMA Annual Meeting - April 1-2 AGA/EEI Customer Service Conference - April 21-24 Metering/CIS/Billings Americas 2002 - April 29-May 1  Written by Editor Regina Johnson, Managing Editor Brad Wolverton, and other seasoned industry experts this issue will be a blockbuster.  Take a look at these in-depth articles:  ECM Exclusive Tom Peters on Energy Branding Whether you're the incumbent utility or a new entrant, brand matters. Business guru and renowned author Tom Peters discusses how to create a lasting brand, who comes closest in the energy industry, and how energy deregulation poses branding challenges.  Energy Strategy Diversify and Conquer More than ever, energy companies are branching out with new business lines and offerings to generate new revenues. Which of these innovative partnerships and customer offerings are proving most successful?  Customer Service Satisfaction Benchmarking: Turn Findings Into Action  Research firm Metrix Matrix presents findings of its survey on how utilities benchmark customer satisfaction. How do your energy company's practices compare? And how do you turn satisfaction ratings and comments into action items to improve service?  Technology Play Demand Buyback: Will Customers Bite? As demand-response programs become an essential part of balancing power supply and demand, energy suppliers are sweetening the deal with cash incentives for customers. Where does curtailment-for-pay fit into the portfolio of demand-response offerings, and what factors should go into designing these load buyback programs?  Special Section Executive Guide to Providers of Customer Management Services Overwhelmed by the vast selection of customer care solutions? Check out ECM's annual guide, and search the energy strategy consultants and vendors by their services, technologies and major clients. Don't miss the industry's most comprehensive directory.  With this incredible line-up, premium positions are sure to go fast.  Call your account executive today to get all the issue details.  Deadlines are fast approaching so call today.  Space reservation deadline is February 14th.  Ad materials due February 22nd. Northeast & Midwest Joseph  Paparello 703-847-7759 paparello@pur.com   West & South Andres Mancini 703-847-7735 mancini@pur.com       This message is brought to you as a registered user of Energy Central.  If you wish to discontinue  receiving this type of message, reply to this message with 'Stop Ads' in the subject of your message.


Track the new system in the Atlantic plus other possible development
with position maps, satellite and radar images plus official advisories
or post your forecast on the message board: http://www.GoPBI.com/storm?tag=e_1027

000
WTNT34 KNHC 280224
TCPAT4
BULLETIN
TROPICAL DEPRESSION FOURTEEN ADVISORY NUMBER   3
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
11 PM EDT SAT OCT 27 2001

AT 11 PM EDT...0300Z...THE CENTER OF TROPICAL DEPRESSION FOURTEEN
WAS LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 27.8 NORTH...LONGITUDE  37.6 WEST.  THIS
POSITION IS IN THE EASTERN NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN ABOUT 960 MILES...
1545 KM...SOUTHWEST OF SANTA MARIA ISLAND IN THE AZORES.

THE DEPRESSION IS MOVING TOWARD THE WEST NEAR  7 MPH ...11 KM/HR
...AND THIS MOTION IS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE ON SUNDAY.

MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE NEAR  35 MPH... 55 KM/HR...WITH HIGHER
GUSTS.	SOME SLOW STRENGTHENING IS POSSIBLE DURING THE NEXT 24
HOURS.

THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS 1009 MB...29.80 INCHES.

REPEATING THE 11 PM EDT POSITION...27.8 N... 37.6 W.  MOVEMENT
TOWARD...WEST NEAR  7 MPH.  MAXIMUM SUSTAINED
WINDS... 35 MPH.  MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...1009 MB.

THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER AT
5 AM EDT...SUNDAY.

FORECASTER LAWRENCE

Make GoPBI.com's Storm Warning Center your No. 1 resource for hurricane
and tropical storm updates: http://GoPBI.com/storm

To subscribe or unsubcribe from this list, visit our Web site:
http://GoPBI.com/storm/email

DO NOT REPLY to this email. If you have questions or comments,  send
them to storm@cimedia.com

Brought to you by GoPBI.com: http://GoPBI.com

You can contact us by mail or telephone at:
GoPBI.com
2751 South Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach FL 33405
(561) 820-3700

Copyright 2001 Cox Interactive Media


Your group has been using Debbie Moore for graphics services and design work.  We want to be sure that you are aware that we are eliminating our graphics services and design work capabilities effective March 11.

As a result of the December layoffs, the services of Bowne Graphics are not available on-site either.

Some units have expressed alarm at the loss of Debbie. However, absent strong expression of need and willingness to pay for services, Debbie will leave Enron on Monday, March 11, and we will no longer have the capability to provide graphic services and design.  Consequently, you may want to identify other sources for this support.

Please let us know if you have strong concerns about this action.

John Ambler and Gina Taylor


Attached is a draft letter to Duke Energy re the above-referenced.


This is very helpful.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000 02:27
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           06/20/2000 01:17 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Chicago Legal Doc Status

Per my voicemail, attached is a list of business items that need to get put
in place in order for Midwest Energy Hub LLC to be fully operational.  There
are probably others that I have missed and would welcome any additions you
may have.  One thing I did not include was any internal Enron approvals,
(DASH, Legal risk memo) that may be necessary.

Call me when you have a chance to talk through the list.

Thanks,

Gregg


05.12.2000

Dear Mr. Lay,

You might recall very kindly hosting a dinner at The Travellers Club in
London for the first energy retreat that we did with Reinhold Heus and Ralph
Hodge. We were very sorry to have missed you this year though we very much
understand that campaigning for the elections was an absolute priority.

I was very pleased to hear that you had tentatively agreed to be able to
make the 25th May free for next years retreat. This years theme, after a
great del of research is set to focus on e commerce and the new economy and
will look at the inter relationship between energy, communication and
investment. I therefore thought that it would be particularly appropriate
given the outstanding work that you are doing in this area. I am sure that
you will feel that the participants are of great interest and I hope that it
will be a real learning experience for both the state companies and the
international energy companies.

As before the group will be limited to 60 top-level executives from
multinationals, independents and state companies and we would aim that some
of the main issues to be covered include:
* Corporate renewal - develop and maintain a competitive edge
* Diversification in the energy industry: into telecommunications,
power, water, e-commerce, trading, auto  - energy in the new economy
* E - Commerce
* Breakthrough in new technologies

I do hope that you are able to confirm your keynote attendance and look
forward to hearing from you.

I also thought that you might be interested in the attached outlining the
governments with which we work.
I very much look forward to hearing from you. .

In the meantime I remain,

Yours sincerely,

 <<...>>

Tim Clark
Group Managing Director
The CWC Group of Companies

Third Annual Private Retreat on the
Corporate Transformation of the
Energy Industry

E-Commerce, Hi-tech Opportunities and Investment

Threats, opportunities, new revenue sources and strategies to maintain a
competitive edge in the new economy

The inter relationships between the development of the energy sector,
changing investment markets and technological change

Special session on the internet opportunities in the European energy markets

Thursday 24th and Friday 25th May, 2001
Pennyhill Park

Moderator: Joe Darby, Chief Executive, Lasmo plc

Aspects Defining the Transformation of the Energy Industry

* Renewing, developing and maintaining a competitive edge
* The new multi-utility
* Corporate renewal within the new energy industry dynamics
* The dynamics of the new business portfolio
* New forms of sustainable energy
* Oil price stability, impact on cash flows and investment
* The future investment decisions for companies in a period of high
cash liquidity

Internet Portals, Communication and the Hi-Technology World

* Evolving in the new economy
* Breakthrough in new technologies
* Investing in and developing communication networks
* Internet portals in the energy industry
* Development of one stop shops - logistics, insurance, legal and
financial services

E-commerce; realising the opportunities and re inventing your business
strategy

* Fundamental changes in  the structure of the industry and future
business models
* E-commerce in a global context
* Tactical e-business decision-making
* Which e-business models really work?
* The sharing of knowledge
* Measuring the impact of your e-commerce strategies
* Evolving strategies in the new economy

Radically Improving Customer and Supplier Relationships

* Automating buyer / supplier procurement through e-commerce
* The development of open e-market places which will transform the
industry's procurement processes
* E-procurement selection, implementation and the creation of added
value
* Enhancing and developing relationships with customers
* E-business and CRM

Investments and Financing within the New Energy Economy

* Equity investments, acquisition financing  and leveraged buy out
* The inter relationship between investments, mergers and hi tech
drivers
* The economics of ecommerce and hi technology developments
* Energy startups
* Corporate venturing

Held under Chatham House rules the private retreat will place great emphasis
on dialogue and incisive debate. All participants will be encouraged to be
proactive and will be invited to take part in specialised discussion groups.

The Chatham House Rules are defined as "When a meeting, or part thereof, is
held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the
information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the
speaker(s), nor that of any other participant may be revealed; nor may it be
mentioned that the information was received at the retreat".

Speakers

Gary Edwards, Senior Executive Vice President, Conoco
Ged Davis, Vice President - Group Planning, Royal Dutch/ Shell
Joe Darby, Chief Executive, Lasmo plc
Gregory Vesey, Vice President - E Business, Texaco Inc
Abdullah Lamki, Deputy Managing Director, Petroleum Development Oman
Ed Morse, Executive Adviser, Hess Enery Trading LLC
Alirio Parra, former Minister of Energy and Mines, Venezuela
Ralph Hodge, former Chairman, Enron International
Stefan Judisch, MD, RWE Energy Trading Limited
Luis Giusti, Non Executive Director, Shell Transport and Trading Company and
Senior Advisor, Center for Strategic and International Studies
Tatsuo Masuda, Director, IEA
C. Norman Davidson Kelly, General Manager, BHP Petroleum
Malcom Butler, Director - Energy Division - HSBC
Partner, Gemini Ernst and Young
Gary Cardone, President and Managing Director, Dynegy Europe
William Garner, Director, Petrie Parkman
Michael Gibbons, Managing Director, Powergen

Invited Keynote Participants

Kenneth Lay, Chairman, Enron Corporation

HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Salman Al Saud, Deputy Minister of Petroleum and
Mineral Resources,  The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tan Sri Dato Mohd Hassan Marican, President and Chief Executive Officer
Petron?s
Willy Olsen, Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy, Statoil
Ahmed Al - Arbeed, Chairman and Managing Director, Kuwait Foreign Petroleum
Exploration
Mohamed Husain, KOC
Erik Ludtke, Head of Buenos Aires Office and Vice President, Duke Energy
Mishari Al Obeit, Kuwait Petroleum Corporation
H.E. Hisham Nazer, former Minister of Petroleum, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Renato Urban, Vice President, ENI SpA - Agip Division
Steve Peacock, Vice President Upstream Digital Business,  BP
Ahmed Mecheraoui, Vice President, Sonatrach
Ibrahim Mishari, Vice President - Information Technology, Saudi Aramco
Bob Peebler, President, Halliburton Company
Stephen Thurston, President, Chevron Overseas Petroleum
Pierre Jungels, Chief Executive, Enterprise Oil
Mohammed Husain, Manager Planning, Kuwait Oil Company
Ronald Robinson, President - Technology, Texaco Inc
Euan Baird, Chairman, Schlumberger Limited

 <<Welcome to CWC Group - internet wording3.doc>> Tim Clark
Managing Director - CWC Group of Companies
Business Design Centre
52 Upper Street
London
N1 OQH
Switchboard + 44 (0)20 7704 6161
Direct + 44 (0)20 7704 9147
Fax + 44(0)20 7704 8440
Mobile 07712 835 310
E mail tclark@thecwcgroup.com

 - Welcome to CWC Group - internet wording3.doc


Hi, Derek!

Any word on where we stand on this master agreement?

Hope all is well.

Marie


Do you know this guy?  I can't place him.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 10/09/2000 01:30
PM ---------------------------

Jeff Shields@ECT
10/09/2000 09:51 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: [Fwd: CMUA Market Reform proposal]

The problem is not "deregulation." The fact is Oregon is not deregulated yet
and rates are going through the roof. Also, one only needs to look back to
1980-85 when rates in the Northwest went up 250% over a five year period
because of nukes. This occurred in a fully regulated environment.

The problem is that many consumers do not have a true choice to secure a
fixed price long-term contract.

You can not put the toothpaste back into the tube!

I hope Enron takes the high road on this issue and pushes for expedited
siting of new generation. The best way to accomplish this is to agree to
compliance with emissions standards and meeting off-sets where they exist.
Where off-sets do not exist, I think Enron can commit to paying for energy
efficiency investments in partnership with utilities or industrial customers
that take the out-put (or take equity) at our new plants.

Paying for conservation, which is running about 19-22 mills in the Northwest,
is a pretty inexpensive way to accomplish good will with end-users and
utilities.


Hi, Jan!  I hope you are all doing well.  I'm sorry to hear that your mother
is ill.  I'm sure it's frustrating to be so far away.

I know you have other things on your mind right now, but I wanted to check
with you about our visiting this summer.  We were thinking about the second
week in July.  We have not made any definitive plans.  Let me know if that
will work.  If this summer doesn't work, we can always try next summer...

Take care.

Susan


John,

A couple of items - would you mind updating the curves for me so I have the
most current info before we begin talking with Chase.  Also, I just wanted to
follow-up on the status of our open items:
Pushkar is on-board and waiting for a contact from Fleet
Credit will still have to be addressed for Stoneville
The margin agreement between Stoneville and ENA will include broad
rehypothecation procedures

What is the status of (1) accounting, (2) nymex risk books, and (3) basis &
index books (dummy trade tickets)?  Let me know when you will have a chance
to look through the model.  Thanks again for all your help.

Mike


An interesting piece of information from the oil markets.
Iraq is trying to extract concessions from the US and threatens to shut down
production as of Oct 1 (just in time for the US elections).

The source of this info is Phil Verlaeger (an oil analyst).
He is very good but excessively concerned with Iraqi machinations.
He is the source of news (reported by Friedman of the New York Times in
his op-ed columns) about massive Iraqi trading in the
oil futures markets. I personally discount this info: the volume and
transparency of
the oil markets  would not support this type of huge scale operations by
Saddam's
government. There may be some trading by Iraqi officials on the side.

Vince


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR>

If this message was sent in error, or a friend suggested you receive this special you may delete your name, please follow directions on bottom or forward to deleteme@excite.com

Get your hands on the most current information available
on
      Texas Power Markets-Restructuring/Competition
and have
      a slice of Cajun food while you read it.

Call
      800-809-8289 to order or for more information or write texasenergyreport@yahoo.com

A Comprehensive Report Detailing
Recent Developments in the Texas
      Power Marketplace.
Get all the facts about the restructured Texas
Power
      Markets in a clear and comprehensive 130+ page report.
•
Legislative
      Summary
• Economic and Market Analyses• Up-to-date Market
Rules
•
      POLR Decisions and   Opportunities• Wholesale Market
      Description•Infrastructure Considerations• ERCOT
Rules•Review of the Pilot
      Program• Participation Requirements•Market Participant
Analysis•Price to
      Beat Analysis•Key Contacts InformationAnd Much More!
All For
      $995
You Will Receive:
Over 130 color pages of
      clear, concise information shipped as a PDF (electronic copy) upon
      processing your on line order. You can either use your credit card
for
      immediate delivery, or complete the on line order form and pay by
check.
      Your report will be shipped to you upon receipt of your check.

Included with each purchase is:
Our
      Louisiana Cajun Basket- including Cafe Du Monde Chicory
      Coffee,
Tony Cachere Jambalaya, Zatarains New Orleans Style
Red
      Beans and Rice, Zapp's Gator Chips, Louisiana's Crystal Hot Sauce,
and
      more.

Order online at http://www.skippingstone.com/texas.htm

    Table of Contents:
I.
      Introduction
II. Electric Competition Legislation
III. Texas Market
      Design and Rules
Overview & General Design
Market
      Structure
Price to Beat
Consumer Protection Rules
Certification
      of REP's
Capacity Auction Rules
Provider of Last Report
      (POLR)
Code of Conduct Rules
IV. Pilot
      Program
Overview
Residential Markets
Small Commercial
      Markets
Industrial & Large Commercial Markets
Lessons
      Learned
V. Program Infrastructure
Overview
System
      Reliability
VI. Program Economics
Price to Beat
POLR
VII.
      Market Participants
Retail Electric Providers (REP's)
Investor Owned
      Utilities (IOU's)
Wholesale Power Marketers/Producers
VIII.
      Conclusion
Appendices:
A. Texas Market Statistics
A-1
      Consumption
A-2 Number of Customers
A-3 Utilities
B. Generation
      Resources
B-1 Generation Statistics - Background
B-2 New Generation
      & Forecast Requirements
B-3 Renewable Energy &
      Demand-Side
Resources
B-4 Significance
C. Role of ERCOT
C-1
      History
C-2 Profile & Statistics
C-3 Jurisdiction
C-4
      Transmission Rules
D. Bibliography & Additional Information
E.
      ERCOT Member List
F. Texas Market Contact Information

energyreleases as: kevin.hyatt@enron.com

To remove future emails of energy specials send a blank email to leave-energyreleases-4286334L@zip.netatlantic.com


Hi Mark,

I'm off to Florida for one week   and then down to Caribean for another week of Vacation with my family and want to wish you and your family a happy holiday and a new year filled with much health,wealth,love,happiness and the time to enjoy them all

Bob


Gentlemen,

Attached for your review and comment is the DRAFT Online User Agreement and
Password Application for HPL's Online Nomination-Information Exchange Website.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


John, as discussed this is what we could do:

   Current:   Proposed:

Term:   Expired March 00  2 years thru Sept 02

Base:   $130,000   $170,000
COLA:   $  23,400   Zero
Cash retention:  $  50,000   None

Bonus:   $110,000 (no target)  No Target
ENE LTI Gurantee: None    $150,000 minimum struck in 1/01
       $100,000 minimum struck in 1/02

Approx annual $313,400   $430,000 (assuming same bonus for illustration)

Let me know if you want a draft prepared.

David

John J Lavorato@ENRON
09/25/2000 10:29 AM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Greg Wolfe

---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 09/25/2000
10:24 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Tim Belden @ ECT                           09/20/2000 12:09 PM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron
cc:

Subject: Greg Wolfe

Here is Greg Wolfe's information.

In addition, he has received the following LT equity:
Date  Type   Term  Number  Strike
12/31/97 KEYSOP Opt  10  1500   20.78
2/7/99  ECT LTCP Opt  10  6508   31.46
2/7/99  ECT LTCP RS  10  2468   31.46

What would you recommend for a contract structure?


Here are my thoughts so far:

1.  Initial Legal Team -- Jeff Hodge, Jim Keller, Carol St. Clair, Aaron
Rothwarg

2.  Spot Check the Forms -- over the next week

3.  Conform Forms to ENA Forms -- over next two months

4.  Develop Form Approval Process -- dual approvals by EES and ENA

5.  Develop Deal Approval Process -- deals above a certain size (or material
variations from the form) would require concurrent EWS approval

6.  Request List of Major Contract Concerns from Traders -- items that cannot
be hedged


Here's my version of the spreadsheet with some explanations...

Only use the first 6 tabs of the file.  On the first tab, this is where you
do your sensitivity analysis.  You can change the discount rate and terminal
value.  These are the only inputs we need for this assignment.

The next two tabs are just historical data for Safeway and Vons.  I used the
Vons tab to see if there were any significant trends in balance sheet or
income statement items as a percentage of sales.

Sales growth forecasts are given in the case and calculated in the
Additional Calculations tab.  After that, almost everything is driven off
the Common Size tab.  Given past trends, we are supposed to forecast each
balance sheet and income statement item as a percentage of sales.  I almost
always used the most recent year as the forecast.  In some cases, the
forecast turned out to be a calculation because the actual number (found on
the DCF tab) was derived some other way.  (e.g., depreciation as a
percentage of PPE).

Note that I did not calculate debt as a percentage of sales.  That's because
we are supposed to figure out both long and short term debt in aggregate, so
I didn't try to break it back out into long and short term as a percentage
of sales.  It doesn't really matter if the whole Common Size tab is filled
out.

Any additional calculations I needed (e.g., sales forecasts) I did in a
separate sheet creatively called Additional Calculations.

Using the given assumptions of 12% discount rate and 7 times EBITDA
multiple, I get a per share value of lower than what Von's stock price is at
the time of the case.  But even using 10% and 8 times EBITDA, I still can't
get to the $58 that Safeway is offering.  However, if you use the 9.9
multiple that Safeway says their proposal represents and 11% discount rate,
you get a share price of about $58.

We are also supposed to look at the ratio analysis at the bottom of the DCF
tab and make sure the ratios are in line with expectations.  You can compare
them to the ratios given at the bottom of the Vons tab.

I get asset turns that are a little higher than historically to begin with
and then they keep going up, which isn't usually normal.  Asset turns tend
to remain relatively constant.  The reason why asset turns start out higher
is because total PPE as a percentage of sales has been going down.  This
makes sense given the information in the case that Vons is closing and
remodeling lots of stores.  Thus, making assets more productive.  The reason
why asset turns are increasing over time is because goodwill as an asset is
steadily decreasing as it gets written off and no further acquisitions are
made.  Thus assets grow slower than sales.  (I checked this.  If you have
goodwill grow as a percentage of sales, asset turns stay constant).

The only other thing is that leverage seems to be much lower than
historically.  I think it's because debt as a percentage of total assets has
gone down significantly.  Given that Vons is generating more cash than
needed to support both operations and investments, extra cash is being paid
out as a dividend.  (See line 76 on DCF tab).  Thus, it is likely that debt
as a percentage of assets will continue to decrease as it gets paid off over
time.  In the model, however, I have kept debt as a percentage of assets
constant at the 1996 level.  (See line 28 in Additional Calculations).  If
you increase debt and therefore increase leverage, you can get the ROE back
up to 1996 levels.  However, without changing the discount rate, changing
the debt has no effect on the DCF share price.

If you have any questions, make sure you "reply to all" so I get it at both
home and school.

 - Vons Model.xls


Mark;

Today, Brett Wiggs told me that there will be a significant number of cuts on our Brazil staff (including Legal) within the next couple of weeks.  He asked me to think about a new structure to assist a small commercial team.  I asked about John Novak and he said "he will probably end up being repatriated and you will become General Counsel".  I was obviously a bit puzzled about his comments/questions and, since he was travelling to the Eletrobolt site today, I asked for some time before giving him any answers.  I wanted to know from you if this is something I should discuss with Brett Wiggs only, or you/Brett, or you/Brett/Novak, or ????

If the Brazil office remains open/alive focusing (primarily) on power marketing activities, I am sure that Karla Azevedo and I could handle all the business guys.  However, I anticipate that, within the next couple of months, there will be plenty of corporate work to be done in the near future such as Central Bank and Board of Trade matters (we would have to decide whether we keep Patricia Dutra in-house OR whether to outsource all corporate & institutional workload to outside counsel  -  I'd rather keep Patricia Dutra until everything is worked out well) as well as a lot of legal work to do on the Eletrobolt financing (where Luiz Watanabe and his trainee Aline Merone are focused).

I'd very much appreciate it if you could find a few minutes to provide me with your thoughts on the matter.  I know we are all going through heavy turbulence these days ...  sorry to bother you with this matter.

Tks & Rgds,

Sami


Are these ok with you?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/27/2001 04:54
PM ---------------------------
From: Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/13/2001 11:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Renee Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Blue Dog change orders

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	03/13/2001 08:37 AM

		 To: Renee Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Blue Dog change orders

Hi there,

Could one of you send me one email with the final (well, we hope) forms of
both of the two change orders we are working on for the BD turbine sets? I
want to make sure I'm looking at the right stuff.

Thanks,

Kay


STOCK iQ  NEWS ALERT
_____________________________________________________________

MERIDIAN USA HOLDINGS

OTC BB:SYMBOL:MUSD

LAST SALE PRICE:  $1.50
52 WEEK HIGH:     $3.50
52 WEEK LOW:      $0.51

SHARES OUTSTANDING:       6.38 MILLION
PUBLIC FLOAT:             3.60 MILLION
MARKET CAPITALIZATION:  $10.20 MILLION

PER SHARE DATA FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2001
CASH IN BANK AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES: $0.66
DISTRIBUTED NET LOSS: (0.32)

* FORMER PRESIDENT OF YOO-HOO HIRED

* MERIDIAN SPORT DRINK TAKES AIM AT $2.3 BILLION MARKET

* LICENSING OF SWEET'N LOW BRAND NAME FOR SYRUP LINE

* MARKETING PLAN SIMILAR TO SUCCESSFUL TEA DRINK
_____________________________________________________________

MUSD (Meridian USA Holdings, Inc.)  through its subsidiaries markets sugar free syrups under the brand name SWEET 'N LOW which was licensed from Cumberland Packing Corp and a sugar free sport drink called  ChampionLyte.

In 1998, the market for the Sport Drink (electrolyte replacement) also called refresher drink constituted a market of $2.3 billion and was growing rapidly. The average annual consumption per capita in the United States is 2.0 gallons.

Although existing products in this market provide electrolyte replacement, they also contain high levels of calories and carbohydrates.The competition  in the marketplace are Gatorade and Powerade, who between them have an approximate 95% market share. Traditionally, when a sugar free product goes into the market, it captures six to seven percent of the particular market share, although Diet Coke has 28 percent of the market share of Coca Cola.

If the company could effect a one percent penetration of the market for sport drinks, they could have  two dollar per share earnings with the resultant effect on the stock price.

What follows are pertinent excerpts from the company's recent SEC filings:

ChampionLyte(TM) Refresher Drinks.
As it is with syrups, there have been no sugar-free products within the isotonic refresher drink category. This category, whose most well known products are Gatorade(R) and Powerade(R) refresher drinks, constituted a market of nearly $2.3 billion in 1998, with average per capita annual consumption in the U.S. of 2.0 gallons. (Beverage World, 1999).

First, diabetics and those with medically restricted sugar intakes had no available refresher drink on the market. This group represents a sizable segment of the U.S. population.

Second, it is believed that persons attempting to lose weight through exercise are often reluctant to consume a drink like Gatorade(R) containing hundreds of calories right after strenuous exercising to "burn-off" those calories.

Their marketing efforts to introduce ChampionLyte have involved ad placements in industry trade publications, radio ads, food show and beverage show appearances and establishment of a network of brokers to sell the products on behalf of the Company.

In October 2000, they entered into a sponsorship and endorsement agreement with Jay Fiedler, the starting quarterback for the Miami Dolphins of the N.F.L., under which Mr. Fiedler has agreed to provide various promotional services in connection with ChampionLyte.

In January 2001, they entered into a similar agreement with the world-ranked and former world middleweight boxing champion, Dangerous Dana Rosenblatt.

ChampionLyte has also qualified for sponsorship by the Diabetes Research Institute sponsorship and each bottle contains that organization's seal of  approval.

Americans spend $33 billion on weight-loss programs and products annually (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2000). Their products are aimed directly at this market.

The enormous success of products such as Diet Coke(R), SnackWell's(R) cookies and numerous sugar-free ice cream, candy and other products have demonstrated the existence of a substantial market for sugar-free/reduced calorie food products.

In November 1998, they succeeded in obtaining an exclusive license for the trademark Sweet'N Low for use on chocolate syrups. Sweet'N Low is the trademark under which the world's most popular sugar substitute is sold, most recognizably in the small, pink packets.

In January 1999, they made their first shipments of Sweet'N Low brand chocolate syrup. By the end of 1999, they had expanded their customer base to more than 150 customers and the products are currently available in over 16,000 food outlets in the U.S.

In June 1999, we entered into an agreement with Francis Anthony, the "Love Chef" of television and magazine fame, under which Mr. Anthony agreed to develop recipes for the Syrup Company and represent the product to the public. Meridian believes that Mr. Anthony's involvement has and will continue to increase the visibility of the Syrup Company's products.

Also in 1999, they obtained the right to market the Syrup as an approved product of the Diabetes Research Institute, a national diabetes research center located at the University of Miami. This approval required their product to pass a strenuous qualification procedure at the Institute to establish our worthiness to use the Institute's name on our products.

Management believes that the quality of their products, their appeal to health-conscious and sugar-restricted consumers, the fame and reputation of the Sweet'N Low trademark for our syrups and our network of food brokers should enable us to continue to penetrate the retail food market.

The primary consumers at whom they are directing their marketing efforts are people suffering from diabetes and others with sugar restricted diets. According to the American Diabetes Association, there are approximately 16,000,000 Americans suffering from diabetes, plus another five to ten million Americans who are required to maintain a strict diet regimen for various medical conditions.

In addition, millions more Americans restrict their sugar consumption in an effort to reduce their calorie intake. All of these people form a natural market for our products. Americans spend $33 billion on weight-loss programs and products annually (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2000). Our products are aimed directly at this market.

The enormous success of products such as Diet Coke(R), SnackWell's(R) cookies and numerous sugar-free ice cream, candy and other products have demonstrated the existence of a substantial market for sugar-free/reduced calorie food products. Public and industry acceptance have been positive to date.

On January 8, 2001, US Bancorp converted its $8,000,000 convertible note along with accrued interest of $229,727 into 8,230 shares of the Company's Series II Convertible Preferred Stock.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Meridian's net sales revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2001 were$239,038, as compared to $408,572 in the comparable period of 2000.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased from $441,521 in the first quarter of 2000 to  $2,108,644 in the first quarter of 2001.  The major element of that increase was non cash interest and amortization costs of $898,605 for the three months ended March 31, 2001, associated with the conversion of the U.S. Bancorp note into shares of the Company's Series II Convertible Preferred Stock in January 2001.

The remaining increases in expenses were primarily related to an increase in advertising and media expenses from approximately$92,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 to  approximately  $586,000 in the comparable 2001 period to support the Company's product lines,  particularly the introduction of the Company's  ChampionLyte (TM)

Meridian had a net loss available to common shareholders of $2,051,145  ($0.32 per share) during the three months ended March 31, 2001, as compared to a net loss available to common shareholders of $267,325 ($0.04 per share) during the comparable prior period.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Meridian's available cash and marketable securities at March 31, 2001 were approximately $4,187,000, as compared to approximately $203,000 at March 31,2000. The increase in primarily attributable to the proceeds of Meridian's issuance of its Series A Convertible Note to U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. in June 2000.

As a result of the U.S Bancorp financing, management believes that is has sufficient working capital to carry out its business plan for the operation and expansion  of its syrup  business  and for the  introduction  and  growth of its sports  refresher drink for at least the next 12 months.  In addition, Meridian believes that operations will increasingly  contribute to cash flow during the same period.

StockIQ is an independent publication providing information on select companies.Any company profiled by Stock IQ may pay cash or stock consideration for the electronic dissemination of the company's information for a specified time period and/or our comments about the company and/or our development of the company's web site.
Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 requires that Stock IQ fully disclose the type consideration (i.e. cash, free trading stock, restricted stock, restricted stock with registration rights, stock options, stock warrants, or other type consideration) and the specific amount of the consideration our company receives or will receive, directly or indirectly, from an issuer, underwriter, or dealer.

No information contained in our web site or our publications should be considered as a solicitation to purchase or sell the securities of the profiled companies.
Stock IQ is not a registered investment advisor or a registered securities broker dealer. We do not undertake or represent to make investment recommendations or advise pertaining to the purchase or sale of the securities mentioned in our web site or publications.

The information contained in our web site and/or our publications are carefully prepared by Stock IQ and are based upon sources that we believe to be reliable. Stock IQ, however, does not guarantee the accuracy of any information contained in our web site or publications.

Moreover, Stock IQ does not endorse, independently verify, or assert the truthfulness or reliability of any statements or data prepared by us or the profiled companies listed in our web site or publications. Investors should not rely solely on the information contained in our web site or publications.

Instead, investors should use the information provided on the profiled companies only as a starting point for conducting additional research that will permit them to form their own opinions regarding an investment in the profiled company's securities.

The receipt of the information contained in our web site or publications shall not create, under any circumstance, any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the profiled company since the date of our comments regarding the company or the date of the profiled company press releases or other information disseminated via our web site or publications.

The information contained in our web site and publications may pertain to small cap and/or thinly traded securities  which by their very nature involve an extremely high degree of risk. An investment in these type of securities could result in the loss of some or all of an investment in the company. In addition, due to the illiquid nature of some of these securities, an investor may find encounter difficulties in liquidating the securities.

We have received no consideration for the posting and dissemination of this report from any company or any person nor is there any agreement that we will receive any compensation of any sort now or in the future.

This report contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events or developments that the company intends, expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on certain assumptions and assessments made by management of the company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors it believes to be appropriate. The forward-looking statements included in this report are also subject to a number of material risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to economic, competitive, governmental and technological factors affecting the company's operations, markets, services and prices, and other factors discussed in the company's filings under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Prospective investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statement are not guarantees of future performance and that actual results, developments and business decisions may differ from those envisaged by such forward-looking statements.

_____________________________________________________________

This newsletter is published by StockiQ.com (http://www.stockiQ.com)
Copyright (c) 2001, All rights reserved.
If you would like to unsubscribe to this newsletter, please send an email with REMOVE as the subject to: sharex_rejects@sharex.com


Julie please call me.


Don't remember if I sent these documents to you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Busby, Todd
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:39 AM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Subject:	ways to book deals


Sorry for the delayed response, I got really busy Friday afternoon and didn't
check my email before I left.

Kenneth D'Silva
04/14/2000 03:21 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Some good ones

If you're not doing anything Sunday evening, would you like to grab a cup of
coffee at Empire Cafe??

Susan M Scott
04/14/2000 03:04 PM
To: Kenneth D'Silva/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Some good ones

Quite good.  They definitely provide a chuckle.


Well, this shows the direction in which the "new" Commission is heading.  The
very good news, though, is that  TW's proposal was included in both
settlements (now that's hedging!).  Thus,  the benefits to TW were preserved
under both proposals.  Congratulations.  That's fantastic--hard work that
paid off.

We will of course express out extreme dissappointment with the PD, and point
out that this decision condemns California to a 20th century infrastructure,
when the state's 21st century economy demands much, much better.

We should discuss.  Since the PD empowers the likes of Norm and Florio, it
will be important to play very close attention to implementation of Hector.

Sorry to have to be the one to deliver the news.   But we have a knack of
making lemonade out of lemons and we'll do out best to do the same here,
whatever turns up at the end.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000 05:53 PM -----

	Michael.Alexander@sce.com
	11/22/2000 05:27 PM

		 To: Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com, tomb@crossborderenergy.com, burkee@cts.com,
craigc@calpine.com, rick.counihan@greenmountain.com, jdasovic@enron.com,
MDay@GMSSR.com, Douglas.Porter@sce.com
		 cc: Colin.Cushnie@sce.com, INGGM@sce.com
		 Subject:

The PD in the Gas Restructuring is out.   I have yet to read the whole
thing, but the title "Approval With Modifications Of The Interim
Settlement..." does not bode well.  According to Steve Watson (and I only
have Steve's statement second hand), the decision reflects a fear that the
timing is wrong in light of the current volatile gas price market.

(See attached file: Proposed.doc)

--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
626-302-2029
626-302-3254 (fax)

 - Proposed.doc


Weather Headlines
Tuesday January 8, 2002
Thaw underway for the short term. Longer range models continue to insist
(as I continue to resist) that real arctic air arrives later in the month.
There is some potential for yet another winter storm in the East late in
the five day period. The point in question is how much cold air is
available or is it just another cold rain for many folks. That will be
answered later in the week. The overall pattern definitely looks warmer for
now though some of this energy goes into melting snow cover rather than
warming the air. The absence of snow in the Plains is one reason why they
are so much warmer relative to normal than areas farther East. But, most of
the country goes warmer than normal before the end of the week. The last to
catch on to this trend is the Southeast.
I am not as bullish as the charts (and some forecasters) in regards to cold
air developing in the medium range period and beyond. I am not saying next
week and the week after will not be colder than this week, they likely will
be. But, I continue to have questions as to intensity and Southern extent
of whatever develops. First, we have yet to see any real polar flow so far
this winter. Second, lack of deep snow cover in the Northern U.S. tends to
inhibit bitter cold. Third, and perhaps most important to me is the lack of
high surface pressures developing over Canada. Now, they may develop
eventually, but I want to see it first. Finally, most models have more of a
West to East configuration at the jet stream level rather than a NW to SE
orientation straight out of the arctic. Given these conditions and recent
history I am just not ready yet to pronounce any major cold developing. In
fact, I would expect the Gulf Coast and SE to actually run warmer than
normal through the 20'th of the month. The Plains, Lakes and NE probably go
back to below normal levels, but not excessively so. It looks comparable to
the past couple of weeks. The West is expected to take on a temperature
profile that closely resembles normal Mid-January levels.
For the period Tuesday January 8 through Saturday January 12, expect the
following temperature trends:
Average 1 to 3-degrees below normal: Southeast?
Average 1 to 3-above normal: Gulf Coast, Mid-Atlantic...
Average 1 to 3-degrees above normal: Northeast, Ohio Valley...
Average 4 to 9-degrees above normal: Northeast, Great Lakes, Ohio and
Mississippi Valleys, Southern Plains and Rockies, California, Intermountain
West, Desert SW, Pacific NW?
Average 10 to locally 20-degrees above normal: Central and Northern
Rockies, Central and Northern Plains...
Andy Weingarten, Meteorologist APB Energy / True Quote


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 10/27/2000 10:34
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     10/27/2000 10:27 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ House Votes, But FERC Unswayed On Calif Pwr Probe Release

17:20 GMT 27 October 2000 DJ House Votes, But FERC Unswayed On Calif Pwr
Probe Release
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission said Friday
it won't be swayed by a House vote urging immediate release of the results
of a staff probe into recent problems in California's power market.
FERC announced last week that it had received the results of an eagerly
anticipated staff investigation of market conditions that sent power costs
in California soaring over the summer.
The agency scheduled an extraordinary meeting for Nov. 1, at which it plans
to vote on proposed remedies based on the report's findings, but declined to
make public the staff's report before then.
"We plan to release the report on the first of November. The date hasn't
changed," said FERC spokesman Hedley Burrell.
The unprecedented high power prices in California this year have generated a
fierce political backlash in the state, as retail consumers in San Diego
were exposed to market-based prices this summer two to three times higher
than what they paid the previous year.
At the same time, utility companies outside of San Diego lost hundreds of
millions buying high-cost power at wholesale and selling it at retail at a
loss under a state-mandated retail rate freeze.
The decision to keep the staff report under wraps until Wednesday was
objected to by FERC Commissioner Curtis Hebert, the lone Republican among
the four sitting commissioners at FERC.
"The people of California should have as much time as possible to digest our
staff's findings and consider the options presented," Hebert said. "It can
only help heal the raw emotions rampant in the state of California."
Rep. Brian Bilbray, R-Calif., whose district is in the San Diego region
where retail consumers were hit by the high-flying wholesale prices this
summer, sponsored the non-binding resolution the House approved Friday
urging immediate release of the report.
Bilbray is locked in a tight re-election campaign against Susan Davis, a
Democratic state assemblywoman, who was a sponsor of the legislation that
created the state's retail power restructuring initiative blamed for
creating the crisis.
The power price crunch has factored prominently in the race, in which
Bilbray has run advertisements likening Davis to a Dr. Frankenstein whose
electricity deregulation monster has run amok.
The House debated Bilbray's resolution late Thursday, but the lawmaker was
unable to attend due to a death in the family. Similarly, Bilbray was
unavailable for the House session Friday when the measure was passed in an
unrecorded voice vote, nor was he available to comment Friday,
Another San Diego-area lawmaker, Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., in a telephone
interview Friday, dismissed the Bilbray resolution as "a meaningless thing."

The non-binding resolution "doesn't do much," Filner said, arguing the House
instead should take up his legislation directing FERC to roll back power
prices in the state and direct power sellers to provide retroactive refunds
to consumers.
Bilbray's resolution is "a politically generated thing to assure he is
covered for his re-election," Filner said. "His party will not let him do
something significant."
-By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires, 202-862-6647, bryan.lee@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 27-10-00
1720GMT Copyright (c) 1998, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

 <<Gunther Pergher (E-mail).vcf>>
 - Gunther Pergher (E-mail).vcf


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Matt,

Subject to the views of Jim Studdert and David Best, given that we already
put underwriters on notice that there was contamination, and given that we
have worked closely with Minton's, underwriters' representatives, I would
assume that we are under no time pressure to give underwriters a  total
quantum before the joint survey  takes place; in fact, it looks like the
final determination of ECT's total quantum of damages may be impacted by the
results of the joint survey (although I would not necessarily want to say
that to underwriters at this point).

My preliminary review of the policy reflects no language in the policy which
would require ECT to immediately provide a total quantum. The policy
specifically requires, under "INSTRUCTIONS IN CASE OF LOSS", that ECT file a
claim in writing against the "delivering carrier holding him responsible as
soon as loss or damage is discovered even though the full exent thereof is
not apparent; details can be furnished later.  Such action will not prejudice
your insurance claim."  Let me know if you would like a copy of the pertinent
policy; I have already sent a copy to David.

I do have some strategy questions for David about the disposition of the
cargo currently in Thailand and will give him a call tomorrow morning at 9:00
a.m. Houston time to discuss.  Although I know that is quite late for you,
you are more than welcome to participate (just e-mail me a telephone number
at which you can be reached, or give me a call at that time).

   Regards,
   Britt

	Matthias Lee@ECT
	08/08/2000 06:52 AM

		 To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing

Britt

With reference to Cliff Bennett's note, do you know whether our cargo
underwriters require notice of the amount of our potential claim? As you
know, previous figures were very rough estimates and only considered the
rejected cargo and associated freight and demurrage. We have not computed the
costs of the Thai cargo loss (if any) and the various testing and analyses
costs.

Regards
Matt

Matthias Lee
08/08/2000 06:41 PM
To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, david.best@clyde.co.uk,
ngregson@wfw.com

Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing

PRIVILEGED; CONFIDENTIAL; ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT

FYI - Please see below Cliff Bennett's recommendations for joint testing.

I spoke briefly with Rich Slovenski regarding the Elang presently stored in
Thailand. He confirms that the intention was to deliver it to First Gas some
time end August/early September premised on delivery and acceptance of the
first Elang cargo and subject to First Gas's consumption.

Cargo still not sold. Rich is not immediately able to calculate loss on the
cargo basis First Gas Price vs resale price, but will be giving it
somethought to arrive at an estimate.

The test results we have to date of the Thai cargo are somewhat inconclusive,
but indicate Lead and Vanadium may be off spec, but principal reason for not
delivering to First Gas is uncertainty of D3605 as a test method.

Summary of Thailand samples test results:

6 July 2000 - Ship Composite sample taken before discharge in Thailand was
tested by SGS Thailand for Carbon Residue 10% and Filterable Dirt. Filterable
Dirt was off spec at 6.3; Carbon Residue 10% was off spec at 1.5. SGS
Thailand suggested that the  Carbon Residue 10% result was questionable and
recommended retesting. There were however, no other ship composite samples
taken before discharge in Thailand. Shoretank samples tested by SGS Thailand
for Carbon Residue 10% and Filterable Dirt on the same date were on spec.

12 July 2000 -  Thailand shoretank samples brought to SGS Singapore tested on
spec except for Lead which tested off spec at 0.3 (T-961) and 0.2 (T-964).
"Ashing" test used for metals.

13 July  2000 - Thailnd shoretank samples brought to Caleb Brett Singapore
tested on spec, but note different test method used (D5184/5185).

14 July 2000 - Thailand shoretank samples re-tested for metals by SGS
Singapore:

Direct D3605
Vanadium off spec at 0.9 (T-964)
Lead off spec at 0.8 (T-961); 1 (T-964)
Vanadium + Lead off spec at 1.2 (T-961); 1.9 (T-964)

"Ashing"
Lead off spec at 0.3 (T-964)

Regards
Matt

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 08/08/2000 06:01
PM ---------------------------

"clifford bennett" <minton@singnet.com.sg> on 08/08/2000 05:40:08 PM
To: "Matthias Lee" <Matthias.Lee@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing

Matthias,

As per my e-mail dd. 3rd August to Eric, from cargo Interests viewpoint it
is usually best in these circumstances to keep as many analytical options
open as possible. Certainly sufficient to enable the best chance of
establishing the cause. To that end, I would recommend that you provide the
other Parties with the test methods (ASTM D-numbers) and state that these
tests will be applied to retain samples from each of:

1. Pacific Virgo before & after loading, Australia (all cargo)
2. Pacific Virgo before discharge, Thailand (Batangas-nominated tanks, if
samples available)
3. Pacific Virgo before discharge, Thailand (Thai-nominated tanks)
4. Pacific Virgo on arrival Batangas (the samples upon which First Gas based
their rejection)
5. Pacific Virgo prior departure from Batangas (including bottom samples)
6. Pacific Virgo prior discharge Korea (including bottom samples)
7. Pacific Virgo, any other samples that are available and that might
progress the investigation

Some testing may involve composites, some individual samples. This will to a
degree depend on the lab's ability to get any particulates into homogeneous
suspension and keep them there long enough to make a composite. If that
can't be done, it will have to be individuals.

Insofar as identifying the particulates, should this prove necessary, I
think we need to keep all options open. While it is always possible to
perform unilateral analysis should disagreements arise, better to keep the
Parties together if possible. But not at the expense of limiting the
analysis' ability to determine cause.

I apologise if this all seems a bit woolly. But if you limit at the
beginning the potential extent of testing that might be necessary, it can
all prove meaningless.

I appreciate that testing cost plays a role in all of this. It is in
no-one's interest to do testing just for the sake of it and, as far as I am
concerned, that is not on my agenda nor, I am sure, is it on Enron's. But we
must be realistic. Depending upon the size of your potential claim (have
Underwriters been put on notice yet, by the way?), it might be worth
spending several $K to get to the root of the matter, rather than less to
learn nothing.

Best regards.

Cliff Bennett
Minton, Treharne & Davies (S) Pte. Ltd.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Lee <Matthias.Lee@enron.com>
To: minton@singnet.com.sg <minton@singnet.com.sg>
Cc: Eric Tan <Eric.Tan@enron.com>; Angeline Poon <Angeline.Poon@enron.com>;
ngregson@wfw.com <ngregson@wfw.com>
Date: Monday, August 07, 2000 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing

>
>
>Dear Cliff
>
>Would you be able to draw up a test programme based on your recommendations
>below with the view to circulate it to all parties (including SGS) for
their
>agreement prior to joint testing? I think such a pre-agreed programme would
be
>most useful and would avoid any dispute on testing procedure subsequently.
>
>Eric expects all the samples to arrive in Singapore within the next couple
of
>days and send out the notice to all parties to attend joint testing
sometime
>between 16 - 18 August.
>
>Thanks and best regards
>Matt Lee
>
>
>---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Tan/SIN/ECT on 03/08/2000 16:49
>---------------------------
>
>
>"clifford bennett" <minton@singnet.com.sg> on 03/08/2000 12:22:21
>
>To:   "Eric Tan" <Eric.Tan@enron.com>
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing
>
>
>Eric,
>
>My recommendations concerning joint testing are as follows:
>
>1. Samples
>
>Ideally, at least one set of sealed (integrity) , traceable (chain of
>custody), samples from each stage of the shipment should be available at
the
>joint testing. The samples will be checked against the appropriate sampling
>records prior to testing.
>
>If possible, I think we should have samples from:
>
>    Loading Australia, one set Pacific Virgo's tanks after loading
>
>    Discharge Thailand, one set pre-discharge vessel's tanks - Thai parcel
>(if the other - Batangas - tanks were sampled at this time, these samples
>should be included)
>
>    Batangas, one set vessel's tanks on arrival, plus one set vessel's
tanks
>from the most recent sampling before the vessel departed Batangas (to
>include "dead" bottom samples)
>
>    Korea, one set pre-discharge vessel's tanks on arrival, including any
>"dead" bottom samples
>
>Depending on exactly what samples are available, testing may encompass both
>composites and, in some cases, individual tank samples (where particulates
>are involved, the composition of individual tank samples even in a
>laboratory can destroy the representivity of a sample. This, by the way, is
>the reason for my concerns over sample decanting in Philippines - evidence
>can be lost.).
>
>2. Testing
>
>I would suggest the laboratory of SGS Singapore because that is where the
>samples are being collated. Provided the testing can be done to the
>appropriate standard and the methods are available, any laboratory would
do.
>As advised previously, the laboratory tests and the witnesses are there to
>ensure, among other things, that all is above board.
>
>2.1 Test schedule
>
>As advised previously, the basic methods I would recommend are:
>
>Carbon residue, ASTM D524
>Carbon residue, 10 % bottoms, ASTM D524
>Ash, ASTM D482
>BS&W, ASTM D1796
>V, Na, K, Ca, Pb, ASTM D3605
>"Filterable dirt", ASTM D5452
>
>Please note that for "filterable dirt", ASTM D2276 is not applicable as it
>is designed for in-situ line samples. ASTM D5452 is a laboratory method
that
>is essentially equivalent. Both methods are intended for particulates in
>aviation fuels. Anyway, SGS Singapore can run ASTM D5452.
>
>
>The above suite of tests should be run on all selected samples (it will
>almost certainly not be necessary to test all available samples) in
>duplicate. Duplicates are necessary because "stand-alone" results are
always
>open to doubt. In any event, duplicates are often a requirement of the test
>method and any reputable laboratory will run duplicates as a matter of
>course. Duplicate samples should not mean twice the price!
>
>3. Investigative testing
>
>This is more difficult to predict in terms of exactly what will be
>necessary. To a degree, it will be guided by what is found in the above
>"spec." testing. My initial recommendation would be to check the solubility
>of the particulates, particularly in aromatic solvent (to check if organic)
>and possibly in acid (to check if inorganic).
>
>If, as has so far been reported, the particulates are not aromatic solvent
>soluble and because they do not appear to contribute to the ash content of
>the fuel, a "best guess" might be that they are carbon particles. However,
>we need to keep an open mind on this.
>
>We might need to think about microscopy - visible or electron - on the
>particles. Possibly also look at elemental analysis of the particles by
e.g.
>energy dispersive X-ray analysis.
>
>I will give some further thought to what might be required by way of
>investigative analysis and revert. At this stage, I suggest that all
options
>on the investigative side are kept open. Owners/P&I might not agree, but
>realistically we cannot predict what we will find or what might need to be
>done until we start getting some spec. test results and some simple
particle
>solubilities done.
>
>I trust this helps. Please keep me advised regarding samples/joint test
>matters.
>
>Best regards.
>
>Cliff Bennett
>Minton, Treharne & Davies (S) Pte. Ltd.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Tan <Eric.Tan@enron.com>
>To: Clifford Bennett <minton@singnet.com.sg>
>Cc: Richard Slovenski <Richard.Slovenski@enron.com>; Matthias Lee
><Matthias.Lee@enron.com>; Angeline Poon <Angeline.Poon@enron.com>; Victor
>Santos <Victor.Santos@enron.com>; John Chismar <John.Chismar@enron.com>;
>Carol Chew <Carol.Chew@enron.com>; ngregson@wfw.com <ngregson@wfw.com>;
>Michael J Gasper <Michael.J.Gasper@enron.com>; John H Harrison
><John.H.Harrison@enron.com>; James P Studdert <James.P.Studdert@enron.com>;
>Alan Aronowitz <Alan.Aronowitz@enron.com>; Michael Philips
><Michael.Philips@enron.com>; Michael A Robison
><Michael.A.Robison@enron.com>; Harry M Collins <Harry.M.Collins@enron.com>;
>Graham Cane <Graham.Cane@enron.com>; Wietze Dingeldein
><Wietze.Dingeldein@enron.com>; Britt Davis <Britt.Davis@enron.com>;
>David.best@clyde.co.uk <David.best@clyde.co.uk>; Paul Henking
><Paul.Henking@enron.com>
>Date: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 6:43 PM
>Subject: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing
>
>
>>
>>
>>Cliff,
>>
>>Appreciate if you could provide a detail programme and methodology for the
>>testing of the samples so that we could take up with Owners and advise the
>>laboratory concerned.  (Appreciate you had given in your email of 25 July
>of
>>your suggested test methodology).
>>
>>Regards
>>Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041915.txt


Reply Message:
Reply from 7133540022 is 7pm sounds good!I will give you a call later,have a great day. to Text message

Original Message:
John.Griffith@enron.com|RE:  |How about 7pm.  Call me this afternoon.  Later

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   7133540022@skytel.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:16 AM
   To:     Griffith, John
   Subject:

   Reply Message:
   Reply from 7133540022 is John,are we still on for today,and if we are
   what time are we meeting. to Text message

   Original Message:
   John.Griffith@enron.com|RE:  |Lets get together tomorrow, thursday the
   1st.  Call me today. 713 853-6247.
   thanks. have fun

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   7133540022@skytel.com@ENRON
      Sent:   Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:38 AM
      To:     Griffith, John
      Subject:

      Reply Message:
      Reply from 7133540022 is Hey John,I forgot today is halloween,Iwill
   be
      out with my kids how about a re_schedule? to Text message

      Original Message:
      John.Griffith@enron.com||Call John Griffith at (713) 853-6247 when
   you
      get a chance.

   **********************************************************************
      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate
      and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
   of
      the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
   disclosure
      by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
   recipient
      (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
   sender
      or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
   and
      delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
      hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
      create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
      Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
   other
      party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract
   by
      estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Attached please find the interview packet for the above-referenced person
including resume. The interview will happen Monday July 24, 2000.  Please
print all three documents for your hard copies.  If you have any questions,
or conflicts of schedule, please do not hesitate to contact me.