Hi!

          For some reason I can not open this file - could you please send me
a hard copy to (713) 646-8453 fax.

                                                                       Thank
you!
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 02:18
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Michael Mousteiko @ ENRON                           03/15/2001 10:38 AM

To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Louis Dreyfus for 12/00 and 01/01 Production Month (Sitara Deal
454380 & 454386)

Have you had a chance to review these spreadsheets? Please let me know. Thank
you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Mousteiko/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001
10:30 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Michael Mousteiko                           03/07/2001 03:05 PM

To: Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee Ann Chance/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Louis Dreyfus for 12/00 and 01/01 Production Month (Sitara Deal
454380 & 454386)

I had Lee ann Chance reallocate the volumes for Louis Dreyfus and we still
could not come up with the $ totals Louis Dreyfus invoiced us for. So I had
Carla McLaughlin of Louis Dreyfus fax me the files they used to calculate
their invoice on these deals. Please review the attached files and let me
know if this is the way this deal should be calculated. Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Mousteiko/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001
02:54 PM ---------------------------

Carla McLaughlin <McLauCJ@ldng.com> on 03/07/2001 01:24:31 PM
To: "'Michael Mousteiko'" <Michael.Mousteiko@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Files

OK let's try this again. Sorry for the confusion.
 <<ENRONGAS(0101).xls>>  <<ENRONGAS(1200).xls>>
Thanks,
Carla McL

 - ENRONGAS(0101).xls
 - ENRONGAS(1200).xls


Hunter,

I will be out of the office on Monday and Tuesday meeting with the EIA in Washington D.C. so I will miss the Tuesday afternoon Trading Track meeting.  I think Biliana should spend a few more months in the fundamentals group since she has only been here since mid-February.  She has also expressed an interest in spending 2-3 months more in the group, and she could benefit from learning about the pipelines in the STP group.

We lose Virawan (Aug 1st), Mat (Aug 1st), and Denver (Sep 1st).

We get Bilal Bajwa (Jul 1st) and Jason Wolfe (Sep 1st)

We could use two additional Trading Track Analysts/Associates in Jul/Aug to fill out the fundamentals group.  If we don't get the people from the Trading Track, I will have to recruit them from the Assoc/Analyst pool.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Chris


Yes, he worked for me, he ran the AECO option book, we let him go since we were not sure of our future at the time, he is setting up the BP Amoco options desk

He is a very smart guy and understand options very well, he is late thirties and has been trading for some time

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Woulfe, Greg
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:26 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:

John,

Do you know a John Distroll from the Calgary office, gas options I believe......

-GJW


Rick/Scott:

Thanks for the info.

I wanted to give you an update on the CoGen project.  I have met with
several groups in ENA Development, and the potential for a fuel switching
facility is attracting a lot of attention.  They initially considered the
20 MW portable unit, but now think there may be more value with a 40 to 50
MW unit.  The opportunity to generate more power using the fuel advantage
caught their eye.  The current scheme is to site the facility at the Tupman
plant, provide EOTT steam and power at a reduced cost, ENA market the
electricity, and EOT participate in the revenue of power sale.  This has
the advantage of controlled energy cost for the plant, participation in the
revenue stream, and limited capital outlay for EOTT.  The downside would be
lack of control of the merchant power activity, and it would be a permanent
facility.  I am also assuming permitting and emissions compliance issues
would not be extraordinary.

There will be a longer construction time, but I stressed to ENA that a new
boiler would need to be built first in anticipation of the generator, and
then it could be incorporated when available.

There were some more questions regarding the plant's energy profile.  I
gave them the information showing historic, and anticipated energy needs,
both for power and gas.  They do need to understand what the daily heat
requirements would be; i.e.  hours of operation at the plant, 8 hr
operations Vs 24 hr operation, temperature requirements for your processes,
are there peak requirements, are there any pressure requirements for steam
or just heat, does the plant shut down operations routinely, etc.  I passed
along you names (Rick & Scott only) as plant contacts as questions come up.

Thanks for your help, and I'll let you know how things progress.

Bob


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 08:20 AM -----

	Walter Guidroz@ENRON
	11/15/2000 07:39 AM

		 To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noel
Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: ClickPaper approvals 11/15/00

Attached are ClickPaper approvals for November 15, 2000.


k#  MDQ
892510  16136 Access to M3
892511  7426 Access to M3
893145  5000 Access to M3
892875  9496 Access to M3

Total  38058

892872  19355 Access to M2
893589  11250 Access to M2

Total  30605