oh boy, you opened the flood gates on this one, missie.

	"Brian J. Johnson" <johnsonb@stanford.edu>
	11/10/2000 01:15 PM

		 To: "Mark Wolff" <mwolff@pumatech.com>, "'Jacqueline Kelly'"
<JKelly@FairIsaac.com>, "Brian \(E-mail\)" <johnsonb@stanford.edu>, "Dad
\(E-mail\)" <pgkel1@aol.com>, "Jackie Harmon \(E-mail\)"
<jacquelink@yahoo.com>, "Jeff Dasovich \(E-mail\)"
<dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu>, "Kimberely Kupiecki \(E-mail\)"
<kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu>, "Rob Klein \(E-mail\)" <kleinrob@aol.com>, "Kim
Pikul \(E-mail\)" <ers@chmai.loxinfo.co.th>, "Ted Chin \(E-mail\)"
<tedchin@hotmail.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Florida Ballot: So what's the problem?

Many of them did ask for another ballot, and were told they couldn't have
one.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Wolff [mailto:mwolff@pumatech.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 10:34 AM
To: 'Jacqueline Kelly'; Brian (E-mail); Dad (E-mail); Jackie Harmon
(E-mail); Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail); Mark
Wolff; Rob Klein (E-mail); Kim Pikul (E-mail); Ted Chin (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Florida Ballot: So what's the problem?

Can anyone tell me why those terribly confused people didn't ask for another
ballot?  Question:  should these confused people be allowed to vote?  or
drive for that matter?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacqueline Kelly [mailto:JKelly@FairIsaac.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 10:20 AM
To: Brian (E-mail); Dad (E-mail); Jackie Harmon (E-mail); Jeff Dasovich
(E-mail); Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail); Mark Wolff (E-mail); Rob Klein
(E-mail); Kim Pikul (E-mail); Ted Chin (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Florida Ballot: So what's the problem?

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Ferguson [mailto:aferguson@altmancronin.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:55 AM
To: Scott Williams; Karin Williams; Jim Whelpley; Jay Peters; Bill
McDermott; Jacqueline Kelly; Anthony J. Greene; Paul Dunivan; Loretta
Dunivan; Casey Douglas III; Carol Corgan; Ian H Altman
Subject: Florida Ballot: So what's the problem?


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
03:25 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Hart, Dana" <DHart@SDGE.com>                           12/08/2000
03:22 PM

To: "'jpmarchand@aep.com'" <jpmarchand@aep.com>, "'jim_staggs@apses.com'"
<jim_staggs@apses.com>, "'bob_anderson@apses.com'" <bob_anderson@apses.com>,
"'david_metz@apsc.com'" <david_metz@apsc.com>, "'jivey@utilicorp.com'"
<jivey@utilicorp.com>, "'dcazalet@apx.com'" <dcazalet@apx.com>,
"'Lhamilton@avistaenergy.com'" <Lhamilton@avistaenergy.com>,
"'biggsbg@bp.com'" <biggsbg@bp.com>, "'peterc@calpine.com'"
<peterc@calpine.com>, "'billr@calpine.com'" <billr@calpine.com>,
"'hreed@powersrc.com'" <hreed@powersrc.com>, "'tchoi@powersrc.com'"
<tchoi@powersrc.com>, "'bbowman@coral-energy.com'"
<bbowman@coral-energy.com>, "'dpenney@coral-energy.com'"
<dpenney@coral-energy.com>, "'rproush@duke-energy.com'"
<rproush@duke-energy.com>, "'sbvanleer@duke-energy.com'"
<sbvanleer@duke-energy.com>, "'njwa@dynegy.com'" <njwa@dynegy.com>,
"'Mike.J.McElroy@dynegy.com'" <Mike.J.McElroy@dynegy.com>,
"'electrotherm@msn.com'" <electrotherm@msn.com>, "'szablyal@epenergy.com'"
<szablyal@epenergy.com>, "'priced@epenergy.com'" <priced@epenergy.com>,
"'dparque@ect.enron.com'" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "'cfoster@enron.com'"
<cfoster@enron.com>, "'shapp@caiso.com'" <shapp@caiso.com>,
"'antrichd@kochind.com'" <antrichd@kochind.com>, "'medwar@ladwp.com'"
<medwar@ladwp.com>, "'jackmcnamara.geothermal@att.net'"
<jackmcnamara.geothermal@att.net>, "'dgordon@exchange.ml.com'"
<dgordon@exchange.ml.com>, "'rshimizu@mieco.com'" <rshimizu@mieco.com>,
"'kamal.hamdan@msdw.com'" <kamal.hamdan@msdw.com>, "'gkosier@newenergy.com'"
<gkosier@newenergy.com>, "'dirk.andreas@nrgenergy.com'"
<dirk.andreas@nrgenergy.com>, "'jon.fischer@pacificorp.com'"
<jon.fischer@pacificorp.com>, "'marc.bommersbach@neg.pge.com'"
<marc.bommersbach@neg.pge.com>, "'stacey.kusters@powerex.com'"
<stacey.kusters@powerex.com>, "'lbryant@pnm.com'" <lbryant@pnm.com>,
"'john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com'" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>,
"'Kristen_L_Sullivan@reliantenergy.com'"
<Kristen_L_Sullivan@reliantenergy.com>,
"'marvin_k_ballard@reliantenergy.com'" <marvin_k_ballard@reliantenergy.com>,
"'pscarpelli@retx.com'" <pscarpelli@retx.com>,
"'emaddox@seawestwindpower.com'" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>,
"'gluna@sempra-slns.com'" <gluna@sempra-slns.com>,
"'ccantor@sempratrading.com'" <ccantor@sempratrading.com>,
"'jay.alexander@southernenergy.com'" <jay.alexander@southernenergy.com>,
"'jdcoggin@srpnet.com'" <jdcoggin@srpnet.com>,
"'agalatic@internetconnect.net'" <agalatic@internetconnect.net>,
"'al_figueroa@vflet.com'" <al_figueroa@vflet.com>,
"'samuel.kwong@williams.com'" <samuel.kwong@williams.com>, "'hevrn1@aol.com'"
<hevrn1@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: SDG&E Request for Proposal

San Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E") hereby issues this request for
proposals ("RFP") for Firm Energy from prospective suppliers to manage the
energy costs of San Diego area consumers. Proposals are due no later than 6am
Pacific Standard Time on Thursday December 14, 2000.

<<RFP120800.doc>> <<Attachment A 12-00 RFP.xls>>

Attached below is the EEI cover sheet, a copy of the EEI Agreement and
SDG&E's Guaranty form which SDG&E intends to use for firm energy procurement
transactions.?

<<Letter to Bidders-1.doc>> <<Master SDGE Cover Sheet for EEI Agmt-RFP-for
discussion with bidders version.doc>> <<Standard Guarantee Form.doc>> <<EEI
Master Contract Mar20001.doc>>

 - RFP120800.doc
 - Attachment A 12-00 RFP.xls
 - Letter to Bidders-1.doc
 - Master SDGE Cover Sheet for EEI Agmt-RFP-for discussion with bidders
version.doc
 - Standard Guarantee Form.doc
 - EEI Master Contract Mar20001.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 02/21/2001 07:00 AM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
11/15/2000 08:58 AM
To:	Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	 (bcc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron)

Subject:	Mkt Affiliate Implications: Reorganization of Houston and Omaha Facilities Management Responsibilities

Enron Energy Services is presently a marketing affiliate of several of the Enron pipelines because EES: (1) buys/sells gas; and (2) holds transport contracts on our pipelines.

Under the FERC's standards of conduct, the pipelines cannot: (1) share transportation information or shipper information with EES; (2) must function independently and keep separate books and records.  Generally, I don't see the FERC having any problem with mechanical, electrical, air-conditioning types of services.  However; there are 2 specific concerns that arise with respect to the described arrangement under the FERC's marketing affiliate standards of conduct:

1. Records -- FERC has ruled that giving a marketing affiliate "access" to transportation and shipper records (including something as simple as file room access) is deemed to be impermissibly sharing the information with a marketing affiliate in violation of the standards. Thus, it seems to me that EES will explicitly not be able to perform any records management function for NNG, TW or NBPL.

2. Billing -  FERC scrutinizes intercompany charges carefully.  In a recent Kinder-Morgan consent order, the FERC used payroll and intercompany charge records to make the case that the pipeline and marketing affiliate did not operate separately.  It would be helpful if any EES facility management charges/allocations come from Enron Facility Services (not EES) --  leaving us room to argue that the facility management subsidiary involves separate functions and staff than the EES subsidiary that is a marketing affiliate.

	  From:  Steve Kean & Bill Donovan                           11/14/2000 06:36 PM

Sent by:	Enron Announcements
To:	All Enron Houston
cc:

Subject:	Reorganization of Houston and Omaha Facilities Management Responsibilities

Responsibility  for daily operations of building support services in the Enron Building, Houston leased offices, and Two Pacific Place (Omaha) will be transitioning from Corporate to Enron Energy Services (EES) by year-end.  The areas affected include facility operations and maintenance of mechanical, electrical, and air-conditioning systems; mail delivery;  housekeeping;  food, copier, and records services.

This transition of services, as presently managed by Enron Property and Services Corp. (EPSC), is designed to optimize value to Enron's Business Units by leveraging facility management businesses now offered by EES to their commercial customers.  EPSC staff having administrative responsibility for these services will report to Enron Facility Services, a subsidiary of EES's Global Energy Services group led by Daniel Leff, President and CEO.

EPSC is responsible for Enron's internal real estate and office development needs, including leasing, space allocations and facility planning, project and construction management, furniture systems, and office relocation.  EPSC, in its development role, remains a part of Enron Corporate Administration Services (ECAS) along with Corporate Security and the Aviation Department, reporting to Bill Donovan, Vice President, Corporate Administrative Services.

This alignment of responsibilities offers the opportunity for EPSC to focus resources on effective utilization of our existing office space assets and managing the development of Houston's new Enron Center Campus project.

<Embedded StdOleLink>


<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 9">
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 9">
<link rel=File-List href="./index_email_files/filelist.xml">
<title>Power Indices - IntercontentalExchange</title>

IntercontinentalExchange

Firm Power Price Bulletin

For Power Delivered on Friday, November 23, 2001

(Trade Date of Wednesday, November 21, 2001)

Click here to access index
history.

* volume represents sell-side only *

Hub<o:p></o:p>

High<o:p></o:p>

Low<o:p></o:p>

Wtd Avg Index<o:p></o:p>

Change ($)<o:p></o:p>

Vol (Mwh)<o:p></o:p>

Cinergy

$17.50

$14.75

$15.47

- 5.42

7,200

Comed

$13.00

$13.00

$13.00

- 3.00

800

Entergy

$18.50

$16.50

$17.06

- 3.26

11,200

Nepool

$28.50

$28.25

$28.38

- 3.62

3,200

* Palo Verde

$22.00

$17.50

$19.99

+ 4.33

16,800

PJM-West

$20.10

$19.90

$19.99

- 5.47

33,600

* SP-15

$23.95

$20.00

$22.75

+ 5.26

28,800

TVA

$15.50

$15.00

$15.25

- 5.08

2,400

                                    * Trade date of Tuesday, November
20th, 2001<o:p></o:p>

<![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p>

For Power Delivered on Monday, November
26, 2001

(Trade Date of Wednesday, November 21, 2001)

* volume represents sell-side only *

Hub<o:p></o:p>

High<o:p></o:p>

Low<o:p></o:p>

Wtd Avg Index<o:p></o:p>

Change ($)<o:p></o:p>

Vol (Mwh)<o:p></o:p>

Cinergy

$21.00

$18.00

$19.14

+ 3.67

11,200

Comed

$17.50

$17.00

$17.33

+ 4.33

2,400

Entergy

$20.50

$18.00

$19.33

+ 2.27

8,800

Nepool

$32.75

$31.75

$32.33

+3.95

2,400

Palo Verde<o:p></o:p>

$23.00<o:p></o:p>

$20.00<o:p></o:p>

$21.00<o:p></o:p>

+1.01<o:p></o:p>

6,000<o:p></o:p>

PJM-West

$25.15

$24.75

$24.90

+ 4.91

18,400

SP-15<o:p></o:p>

$24.50<o:p></o:p>

$23.25<o:p></o:p>

$23.90<o:p></o:p>

+1.15<o:p></o:p>

6,800<o:p></o:p>

TVA

$19.50

$17.00

$18.70

+3.45

4,000

<![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p>

<![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p>

Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11
AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm
power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6
AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s)
specified.

IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for
over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North
American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and
precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and
options.

In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you
acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the
IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity
without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
  Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has
exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2)
IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your
own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data,
in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent
of IntercontinentalExchange.

This data is provided to you free of
charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this
service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.

You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or
warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.

To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com.

To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe.

©Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
2001, All Rights Reserved.


Rick,

I asked the same question last week but have not received a response........

Rick Willson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

02/28/2001 06:54 AM

To: Ken Rice/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
cc: The eThink Team@ENRON, All Enron Worldwide@ENRON

Subject: Re: Talk to Joe Sutton on eSpeak Today!

Are we having a little problem or what?  I am getting eSpeak announcements
from last year and the year before!


I am doing pretty good.  I have been really busy lately.  And the work
situation should be resolved sometime next week as I am interviewing for two
other internal positions on the trading desk.  Family is okay I guess. Dad is
not doing well at all and was almost checked into the hospital yesterday.
Angela is really really worried about him and we talk just about everyday.  I
am in the process of getting the documents for power of attorney in case
anything happens to him and he is incapacitated or something.  I had a very
interesting weekend last weekend.  Just a whole bunch of crazy shit
happened.  It was all fun stuff though.  How about you?


Here is the updated deal sheet for the GTD group.  Thanks!
Ben


My finger was just to darn fast to hit the send button.  Here's the
attachment.


let me know what time
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001 11:32 AM
---------------------------

"Jason Bass" <jbass1@houston.rr.com> on 01/08/2001 11:10:29 AM
To: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: My Resume

We will be there.  Name the time and which Pappasitos

----- Original Message -----
From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: <jbass1@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: My Resume

Shanna and I would like to take you and Donnita to dinner
on Friday at Pappasitos.  Can you make it?

-Eric


I haven't heard anything specifically, but ALJs are supposed to issue their
proposed decisions within 90 days of submission.  Assuming that Phase I was
submitted on the filing of reply briefs, the proposed decison should be out
by this Thursday (Nov. 9).  But this rule isn't strictly enforced, and
Michelle has been very busy in a lot of her proceedings.  I would still
expect the PD shortly (by Thanksgiving, if not sooner).
Hope everything has been going well with you,
Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert.Frank@enron.com [mailto:Robert.Frank@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 12:08 PM
To: BCragg@GMSSR.com
Cc: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Subject: CPUC DG case - Phase 1 ruling

Hi Brian - have you heard anything about when we might expect a proposed
decision on Phase 1 issues from Michelle Cooke.  (Jeff, I'm trying to get
information for Martin Wenzel on DG).


The Cal ISO, Williams, AES Corporation, Southern, and Reliant moved that the
CPUC modify its protective order.  People are protesting the fact that they
have to file their answers before resolution of multiple issues over the
protective order.  Williams is threatening to file a motion to quash.  It
says "to the extent the CPUC is conducting a valid investigation within
jurisdictional bounds, Williams will cooperate."  Richard you may want to
call their attorney Alex Goldberg to get the details, if you haven't already
talked to him.  Sorry, I don't have his phone number any more.


-----Original Message-----
From: jeffsmirin@txu.com [mailto:jeffsmirin@txu.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Buss, Jd
Subject: TXU Lone Star Pipeline Standard Pooling Agreement

Here is the standard pooling agreement.  I noticed that the last two pages
in the file are actually the cover sheet and index, which should actually
be at the front of the document.

(See attached file: Standard Pooling Agreement.doc)


I'm assuming from your answer that this is free gas for HPLC at this point.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           11/01/2000 06:34 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem
Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly
Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Is this date really June of 1999?  Hopefully we're not just finding out about
this?

I don't think we can even process this request.  The East Desk was not up and
running on Unify in June of 1999.  All of our pathing for June of 1999 was in
Autonoms and it's not y2K compatabile. With the volumes involved being so
small and the accuracy of the data at Enerfin in question, why don't we let
this volume hit the new OBA at Enerfin as a PPA???

I welcome your thoughts.
Victor

	From:  Cynthia Franklin @ ENRON                           11/01/2000 02:50 PM

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Victor,
Can we go this far back? Please advise.
Cindy
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron on 11/01/2000
02:54 PM ---------------------------

Jackie Young@ECT
11/01/2000 11:25 AM
To: Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Cynthia/Meredith,

Can you please scroll below to my request to Daren regarding 98-0439 and see
if you can assist me w/this request?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 11:23
AM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
11/01/2000 10:16 AM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Jackie,

Please get with the East Desk on this.  If they agree, we can roll the deal.

D

Jackie Young
11/01/2000 10:03 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO

Daren,

On the above mentioned dates, there was no nomination at the Enerfin meter.

6/3/99 and 6/8/99 revealed activity for ENA (202K).  Can the deal be extended
for 6/4 (548 dec.) and 6/9 (40 dec.) to cover this flow so that Volume
Management can create an accounting arrangement for these two days?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


we will need to get new business cards
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Enron Messaging Administration
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 9:15 PM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject:	Supported Internet Email Addresses

Enron Global Technology is in the process of decommissioning the support for all non-standard Internet Email address formats. The only Internet Email address format that will be supported, once this effort is completed, is firstname.lastname@enron.com. We will no longer support Internet Email address formats such as name@enron.com, name@ect.enron.com, name@ei.enron.com  (where "name" is an abbreviation, acronym or alternative to an employees firstname and/or lastname). Every Enron employee has an Internet Email address of firstname.lastname@enron.com and must begin making the necessary arrangements to start using this Internet address format if they are not using it already.
Any new/existing application systems or business cards that reference a non-supported Internet Email address will need to be changed to reference the only supported firstname.lastname@enron.com Internet address format. It is important to remember to also notify any external contacts who are currently sending Internet email to any non-supported Internet Email addresses.
To determine what your supported Internet Email address is, take your name as it appears in Outlook or Lotus Notes and replace any "spaces" that appear in your name with periods and append @enron.com. For example in Outlook, Alan Smith, Robert (firstname = Robert, Lastname = Alan Smith) will have a supported Internet Email address of robert.alan.smith@enron.com.
IMPORTANT : If you need to update your business card(s) to reflect your supported Internet Email address, please ensure you test & confirm the delivery of Internet email to your supported email address prior to updating your business cards. If you experience any issues with delivery of Internet email to your supported Internet email address, please contact the Resolution Center.
We will communicate further details, including the cut-off date, in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, it is imperative that you begin making the necessary arrangements to change over to using the firstname.lastname@enron.com Internet Email address format. If you have questions regarding this email, send an Email to enron.messaging.administration@enron.com.
Thank you for participation, cooperation and support.
Enron Messaging Administration


I can't remember how I got here but below is the URL.  It is a flash program
so sit back and watch.  Once the show is over go to the site map to review
the other related sites to this project.  They must have lots of people with
time on their hands to do this.  Wish we had the luxury!   cvb

http://dossier.enron.com/intro.htm


are you really in nyc?


Here is our first cut at a transition plan.  The spreadsheet is referred to in the Word document.

Mark Taylor
Vice President and General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street - EB3892
Houston, Texas 77008
(713)853-7459
(713)646-3490 (fax)


Mike,

I have attached 2 files below.  The file entitled "Continental Power
Assessment.doc" is the assessment that I had during my eight week stay in
London.  The file has 2 pages, the first being a summary and the second is
more detailed.  I may not have given you a copy as you were on vacation
during my last week.  I did have lunch with Fernley at which time I
communicated these concerns and future projects.  Also, I met with James New,
Paul Mead, and Gregor Baumerich on an individual basis and delivered the same
document.  Lastly, I left a copy for Joe Gold as he was out of the office.

After reading your e-mail to Sally, I composed the second file entitled
"Continental Power Summary.doc."  This file is a summarized, one-page list of
issues with which you, Joe, and I are concerned (as well as Sally and Fernley
of course).  The arrows below each section points out the potential risk that
we are really talking about.

I am on vacation Friday, June 22 and the week of June 26.  Sally mentioned
that you are in Houston July 5 - 7.  Let's meet to further discuss these
issues and so that I may inform you about what continued work is in progress
for Continental Power.

Thanks,

Todd


Mark, I really don't think we need to have this all hands mtg - in particular
I don't want to drag Lou into this discussion again.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
06:34 PM ---------------------------

James M Bannantine@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/30/2000 05:46 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Retail in South America

I will be in Houston next week and we can discuss if you want to.  The idea
here was not to explain the retail product offering or any concern of
dropping the ball, rather a one off download of where we currently stand in
South America  and high level overview of  how to work together to keep
everyone on the same sheet of music and not miss  a beat.  For instance,
there is already a local staff in place to handle initial deal flow (which is
already happening) that needs to benefit from Dan's systems and best
practices, but which has already based what they are doing on how Dan
operates.  We have always benefited from as much of Dan's and Marty's
attention as we could get over the past year and a half as we set this up.
By the same token we can't be competitive in this business in Brazil on a
cost basis from Houston, so that is why we have formed local staff based on
EES systems and practices, and hopefully some controls as we go forward.  It
is late here and my assistant is gone but I think the meeting is already
scheduled.  If you can't be there maybe we can backbrief you.

David W Delainey@ECT
11/30/2000 11:21 AM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Retail in South America

Jim, I really don't see a need for this meeting - you can count on us not
dropping the ball.  I have a good understanding of the retail product
offering, in fact, we lead the outsourcing sales process for the large
industrial customers in NA until EES bought back their minority
shareholders.  I have a very good relationship with Dan Leff and Sunde.  I
already have Dan's committment to help service the execution of the business
initially.  As it grows and the product proves itself out we can staff.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------

James M Bannantine@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/30/2000 10:33 AM
To: Lou L Pai@EES, Mark Frevert@Enron, David W Delainey@ECT, Dan Leff@EES,
Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey@ECT, Don Black/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Retail in South America

My assistant will be putting together a meeting/conference call for next
WEdnesday on how to move forward with retail in South America given the plan
to have retail report through the wholesale group in South America for 2001.
Key points for discussion will be:

-brief overview of the state of the retail business in South America
-brief overview of the current retail organization and how it would report
through wholesale
-discussion of how we  move from where we are currently (good value
proposition, customer's signed up, organization to implement)  to make the
retail business a success:
 -by having an interface with EES for best practices, systems, etc.,
 -under wholesale budget and organization for simplicity and cost sake

Wednesday is Mark's first day back in the office from Europe, Dan will be in
Europe, Orlando will be in Brazil, others I believe in Houston, so we will
try to accomodate everyone's schedules or at least get a quorum of those
involved present on the call/meeting.


Please find attached a copy of the 250MWh/year or less and the more than
250MWh/year forms of retail electricity contract.

I will be out of the office at a course for most of the day tomorrow and at
least until noon on Friday.  As a result, I may be difficult to reach.   I
will be checking my messages periodically and will carry my cell phone.

Shawn and Jason, please be advised that I have faxed a copy of a mark-up for
Co-op to Linda Sietzema to prepare.  Peter has agreed to proof my changes.

Adios.

Mark


Guys-

  Fran and I have just noticed that two of the deals remarketed real-time were put on the ST NW book and the third was put on the W Hourly book.

  We need to get together and chat so that we can keep this consistent and make sure that the right books recognize the changes.

  Let me know if you will have time this afternoon by 3.
 If not, let's plan to meet tomorrow.

  Thanks,

  Virginia


DONE
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT on
04/06/2000 03:49 PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
04/06/2000 03:24 PM
To: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heidi
Griffith/DUB/EES@EES
cc: James T Javins/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CNG Appalachian production

Terry, please call Jack Meyers (304-623-8811) at CNG Transmission and have
these meters moved from CES/CEM pools to Enron's pools.  I think all you need
to do is send CNG a letter  requesting;

   "Please move all meters flowing into contract 8G0A61 to contract 8G0011".

If CNG needs meter information, maybe you could send them the statement they
send to Gloria,  I believe CES/CEM has 11 contracts.

Let me know if you have any questions.

thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2000 03:07
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
04/05/2000 06:10 PM
To: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, James T Javins/DUB/EES@EES, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES
cc: Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CNG Appalachian production

The CES/CEM CNG Appalachian production is still flowing into the CES/CEM
gathering and transmission contracts.  Unless someone objects I would like to
get this moved over to Enron's pool.  We don't need to have the gathering and
transmission contracts moved over.

Comments/questions?


California State Treasurer Phil Angelides held a press  conference this
afternoon to announce that $3.5 billion in interim financing has  been
arranged through J.P. Morgan and Lehman Brothers, and that an additional $1
billion in financing is expected to be completed next week from an
undisclosed  source.
?
The financing is in conjunction with an executive order issued  yesterday by
the governor that allows bond?sales for energy purchased by  the Department
of Water Resources.? Previously, Gov. Davis and Treasurer  Angelides had
sought legislative approval of the bond issuance, but were not  successful.?
Further review by state attorneys determined that the governor  could
authorize the issuance of bonds by executive order with the difference  that
the bonds can only be used for energy purchases going forward and cannot be
used?to backfill past general fund expenditures.?
?
A one-page?handout summarizing the financing has been  sent to Houston.??The
vital statistics are:

The authorized loan amount is $5 billion, with an initial  $3.5 billion
committed;
The rate is 4.75%, but will jump to 7% if the bonds are not  issued
successfully by October 31, which is the scheduled maturity date of the  loan
(Angelides emphasized that this is not the due  date).

The goal of the financing is to stem the flow of funds from  the general fund
for power purchases and avert a cash crisis.? The  financing, which also
provides working capital for continued?state energy  purchases,?is secured by
revenues from electricity sales and will be repaid  by the bonds.
?
Angelides noted that the financing, which he hopes to have  totally closed by
July 1, precludes generators from walking away from contracts  under the
clause that requires financing by a certain date.? He said it  satifsies
"most" DWR contracts and?precludes arguments made by generators  for a
"credit premium."
?
Angelides also said that the financing is important because it  "builds
momentum" for the huge revenue bond sale and that it "sends a powerful
signal to Wall Street that the bond issue is real."
?
According to his figures, the general fund is currently out  about $5.2
billion net ($6.1 billion in purchases minus $900 million in  revenues) in
power purchases through June 12.
?
Steps still must occur before the bonds can be issued, he  said.? The PUC has
to adopt rate agreements, adopt a servicing order with  the utilities to
collect revenues to repay the bonds, and has to enact rate  increases of
about 3 cents/kwh in SDG&E's territory.? Angelides noted  that the lenders
have made their financial commitment event though these PUC  actions are
still outstanding.
?
The bonds will not be issued until early September.?  Angelides said late
August is a terrible time because the financial community is  on a pre-Labor
Day holiday and that the state would hold off until the more  favorable
period following the holiday.
?

?
Earlier in the afternoon, the Foundation for Taxpayer and  Consumer Rights --
Harvey Rosenfield's group -- held a press conference to voice  opposition to
the Edison MOU.? They all seem to agree that the MOU is  likely dead, but are
afraid of it arising at a later date in some form.
?
When asked about the business community being asked to  shoulder the costs of
utilities' debt, Rosenfield said that a problem has arisen  in that business
wants direct access but DWR has already purchased the power  they "don't
want."? He believes Edison alone should be responsible for its  debt; it's
government's role to go forward, he said, and Edison's job to "clean  up its
mess."
?
Rosenfield cautioned that if legislators "make the mistake of  paying one
more penny" towards a bailout there will be a referendum on the  bailout and
the legislators voting for it.? He said they would be  held personally
accountable.
?
(Exactly what he means by this is unclear.? In  California, a "referendum" --
which is the word he used -- is a little-used tool  to overturn legislation
that has been passed and signed.? Whether he was  threatening recall attempts
is also unclear.)
?
Rosenfield added that depending on how things progress, there  could be an
initiative and it could include a public power  component.
?
The press release issued at the press conference, which also  featured Harry
Snyder of Consumers Union, has been forwarded to Houston.?  It is also
available through this link:
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/utilities/pr/pr001706.php3
?
?


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
05:47 PM ---------------------------

Joana Ryan Bekerman@ENRON
12/11/2000 03:17 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Multi Trigger

Vince,
Jere asked that I forward you a copy of the draft presentation on the multi
trigger transactions.
Please call if you have any questions.
54426
Joana


Peter:
Do you have any thoughts on this?

Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2000 08:53 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	05/15/2000 12:27 PM

		 To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Securities Rep

Weyerhaeuser Company Limited,

Peter:
Weyerhaeuser Company Limited, a company located in Ontario, wants to change
the standard securities rep that we have in our current ISDA Schedule to the
following:

"It is a Qualified Party within the meaning of the Ontario Securities
Commission, Rule 91-505 Over-the-Counter Derivatives."  Our current rep is
attached.  Is this something that we can agree to?
Carol


Are you there?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Dear Harry,

I would like to talk to you about the decision Enron made regarding summer
internship and how I could improve my chances next time. Could you advise me
on the time to call you?

BR,

Maksym Yegorychev.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2000
12:05 PM ---------------------------

"SOCORRO HERNANDEZ" <SUHERNAN@llgm.com> on 05/11/2000 10:31:50 AM
To: <Judy.Hernandez@enron.com>, <silviamanzanales@hotmail.com>, "A. SUE
GONZALES-GUEVARA" <AGUEVARA@llgm.com>, "CATHERINE BROWN" <CLBROWN@llgm.com>,
"KATHY MARIE MOORE" <KMOORE@llgm.com>, "MARIA SOLIZ" <MSOLIZ@llgm.com>,
"MARIA THOMPSON" <MTHOMPSO@llgm.com>, "VIVIAN FARRELL" <VFARRELL@llgm.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: click on the roses!!

Good morning my friends.  I probably sent this to some of you before, but I
ran into it again, and made me feel so good, that I felt like sharing it with
all of you again.  Hope you can open it and enjoy it, as much as I did.

Love you all.

Coco

 - friendship_1.pps


Teresa,

Is this still a good email address for you?

Bill Rubinsky


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042401.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2


yes, now i can go after each trader.  also i had mentioned to peter (I
believe)  that i wanted to see not only product offerings in egm, but also
new products we add every week.  thanks.  jeff

Andy Zipper@ENRON
11/30/2000 03:15 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Trade count by Country,Commodity and Category for Nov 29th, 2000

Jeff, I get this report everyday. Are you interested in geting it on a
regular basis ?
---------------------- Forwarded by Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000
03:13 PM ---------------------------
From: Justin Rostant@ECT on 11/29/2000 05:09 PM
To: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dave
Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Trade count by Country,Commodity and Category for Nov 29th, 2000


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 04:12
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jim Homco                           02/26/2001 10:42 AM

To: jems5@ix.netcom.com, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gas Stocks

Article about CHK - company is very similar to TMR - I'm in both heavily....

Chesapeake Energy stock being sorely undervalued
2001-02-25
By Melissa Davis
Business Writer

Ask the experts. Chesapeake Energy is more than a $9 stock.
Forget that Chesapeake is up more than 200 percent from a year ago -- and up
more than 1,000 percent from its lowest days, not long ago, when it traded
for less than $1. Chesapeake still appears sorely undervalued.
Last week, Chesapeake announced record fourth-quarter earnings that were
1,736 percent higher than earnings for the same quarter in 1999. The company
also reported a 2000 net income of $3.52 a share -- which means you can buy
Chesapeake for a price that is less than three times the company's earnings.
"No stock trades for three times earnings," said Mickey Thompson, executive
vice president of the Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association. "The
independent producers are all undervalued right now. Chesapeake is just the
most undervalued."
Chesapeake is the 10th-largest independent producer of natural gas in the
country. And natural gas, because of low supply and high demand, is one of
the hottest commodities on the market. It's a huge money maker.
So Chesapeake is in the right business at the right time -- and it's into it
heavily. Natural gas accounts for almost 90 percent of all the business that
Chesapeake does.
This has already caught the attention of some prominent investment experts.
Chuck Clough has picked Chesapeake as one of his favorite companies in his
current favorite sector -- natural gas. And Clough isn't just anybody. Until
a year ago, he was chief investment strategist for Merrill Lynch. Shortly
after he left, he established a hedge fund that returned 17 percent, after
fees and costs, during an 11-month time period when the rest of the market
slid -- and the Nasdaq tumbled 44 percent.
Clough's young hedge fund now boasts $150 million in assets.
He's not too worried about falling natural gas prices. He's invested 32
percent of his portfolio in energy stocks and most of that in natural gas.
He's convinced that companies like Chesapeake will begin trading for much
more than two or three times their earnings -- and soon.
Stephen Smith, a Houston analyst for Dain Rauscher Wessels, considers
Chesapeake to be a top performer among the energy companies he covers. He is
convinced the stock is undervalued and that -- even after gaining 326 percent
last year -- Chesapeake will have another banner year in 2001.
"Natural gas prices don't have to stay at $7, $8, $9 or $10 for them to have
a good year," Smith said. "The prices could drop to $4 or $5, and that would
still be a wonderful doubling of what they used to be. If we can continue to
see $4 gas prices, then I think that energy stocks -- and particularly
Chesapeake -- will start to respond a bit more."
Thompson, who moves within local energy circles, is very optimistic.
"The natural gas prices we lived with for most of the '90s will never come
back," he said. "I can see a scenario with $4 and $5 gas prices for a long,
long time."


I will be out of the office from July 9 through July 13.


Effective, February 1, 2001, ENW Contractors are required to utilize the SAP/CATS systems to record all time worked.  Each Cost Center Owner is responsible for keeping track of their Contractors' hours on a monthly basis, as well as ensuring Contractor compliance with this mandate.

At the end of each month, ENW Accounting is providing Contractor reporting to Office of the Chair.  However, the accuracy of this report is dependent on Contractors entering their time into SAP.

As a result, going forward, a second "non-compliance" report will be submitted to Office of the Chair on a monthly basis, detailing Contractors not entering their time and the Contractor supervisor.  Please contact Diane Latson (X5-7184) if you believe your contractors are exceptions and should not be entering time.

Contractor Time Entry

Contractors are required to enter their time in eHRonline to one of the following: (1) project numbers, which are called WBS Elements; (2) cost centers, which are associated to a specific department and not a formal project.  It is the Supervisor's responsibility to ensure Contractors are provided with the proper project or cost center coding.

Unlike invoice coding, SAP will only accept a Cost Center or WBS element number for each time entry line.  This means that you cannot enter a Cost Center and a WBS element number on the same line.  SAP will read this information from left to right and will only pick up the first entry.  For example:

		CostCenter		WBS Element
		123456		c.9999.99.99.99

The system will look at this entry and all time will be charged as expense to Cost Center 123456.

Any questions regarding  time entry coding should be directed to ISC HR support x5-4727.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000 12:02
PM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/27/2000 11:49:58 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Porter, Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon,
Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: April '00 FOM numbers for CES

Chris--Attached is the spreadsheet that we spoke of earlier today.  I have
made
the correction to TCO Op 2, Mkt Area 20 into NYSEG (i.e. +854 dth/day).   I
will make the necessary changes to the AGL volumes over the next few minutes.
As we discussed, we'll need to resolve the question about Central Hudson off
Iroquois (we may not need any volumes there since Duke is the supplier), and
as
I said, we'll be discussing our needs into southern Connecticut on a firm
basis
with other suppliers.   I am also attaching the spreadsheet with the storage
injections for assigned storage.   I believe that we need to negotiate the
price for all of the  April storage injections.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - Apr00 Master.xls
 - COH & AGL.xls


It's been changed to Prebon.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:55 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout

yes i think deal 549010 should be Prebon instead of Amerex.

Thanks!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:39 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout

Prebon
Sean Crandall
549048 - changed to NP

Diana Scholtes
Prebon broker said our price (215) and del. point (Cob) are right

Jeff Richter
549013 - changed to APB

549010 - enron buys BP/Apr01/NP/peak/207.00 (in with Amerex - should it be
Prebon?)

Chris Mallory - just entered Williams deal

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:27 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/13 Checkout

AMEREX
All deals checked out fine

PREBON

Sean Crandall
deal 549048
Prebon shows del. point as NP-15

Diana Scholtes
deal 549053
Prebon shows price as $141 and delivery pt as Mid-C

Jeff Richter
deal 549013
Prebon does not recognize

I am missing the following:
1) Enron buys from BP Energy 25 mw of April'01 NP-15 peak hrs at $207
2) Enron buys Williams 25 mw of SP-15 of April'01 off-peak hrs at $107

BLOOMBERG
All deals checked out fine.


i dont remember if we fixed these yet.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001 01:00
PM ---------------------------

herve.duteil@americas.bnpparibas.com on 04/10/2001 04:05:06 PM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:

John,

Sorry again...  my last 2 trades (EOL # 1112587 & 1112596 - I sell 1/2 day
twice
@5.55 on May) were done again by mistake on US Gas Daily instead of NYMEX.

I have called your help desk to try to remove US Gas Daily from my NYMEX
screen
which we cannot do so far unless I select each quote individually.  However
this
would run the additional problem of not showing up new tenors you may
introduce
over time.

Thank you and best regards,

Herve

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis
a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute
diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS
(et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message,
dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the
addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS
(and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message
if modified.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________


What follows is a memorandum from William J. Museler to me invoking the
Temporary Extraordinary Procedures and requesting me to reissue ECA20000907A.
Immediately following the memorandum is the ECA itself.  It now carries the
number ECA20001208A.  The memorandum and the ECA are also being posted on the
OASIS.

MEMO

Date:          December 8, 2000

From:          William J. Museler, President & Chief Executive Officer

To:       Steven J. Balser, Manager of Market Monitoring and Performance
James H. Savitt, Market Monitor

Re:       Extraordinary Corrective Action to Address a Market Design Flaw:
HAM Transactions Failing Checkout (ECA 20001208A; re-issuance of ECA
20000907A)

Thank  you  for  the  presentation of the Market Monitoring and Performance
Unit  and  the Market Advisor regarding the progress that has been made with
the
Market  Participants  in addressing the market design flaw concerning import
and
export   transactions,  including  wheel-through  transactions,  that  fail
the
check-out procedure between the completion of BME and the SCD operating
hour.  I
am  pleased  that  the  Business  Issues Committee gave unanimous support to
the
NYISO  to  re-issue ECA 20000907A until the Market Participants can consider
and
approve,  and  the  NYISO can implement, a tariff change required to
permanently
address the Market Design Flaw.

As  stated in my Memorandum to you of September 6, 2000, I agreed with your
conclusion that the conduct identified at that time constituted a

?Market Design
Flaw?  as  defined  in  Attachment  Q  to  the ISO OATT, Temporary
Extraordinary
Procedures  for  Correcting  Market  Design  Flaws  and  Addressing
Transitional
Abnormalities (the ?TEPs?).  As further stated in that Memorandum, I agreed
with
your  analysis that prices produced by exploiting this Market Design Flaw
would,
absent  appropriate action, remain at levels different from what would
otherwise
occur during periods of efficient competition.

I  have  now  determined,  based  on  consultations  with ISO Staff and the
support  of the Business Issues Committee, that it is appropriate to maintain
in
effect  the  corrective measures adopted as ECA 20000907A while consultation
and
cooperation with the Market Participants and jurisdictional agencies is
on-going
to  develop  and  implement appropriate rules or rule changes in accordance
with
the ISO Agreement.

Please re-issue the text of the Extraordinary Corrective Action (?ECA?) and
post  it  on  the  OASIS,  for implementation effective at the expiration of
ECA
20000907A.  The ECA shall be effective for a period of ninety (90) days.

William J. Museler, President and CEO
New York Independent System Operator

cc:  Market Participants via OASIS

New York Independent System Operator

Extraordinary Corrective Action 20001208A:

Market Design Flaw Regarding HAM Transactions Failing Checkout

Applicability

This Extraordinary Correction Action (ECA) shall apply to:

?    Import and export transactions;
?    that are scheduled for an operating hour in the Hour-Ahead Market (HAM)
by
the Balancing Market Evaluation (BME); and
?    that fail checkout for reasons within the control of the Market
Participant, or that are cancelled at the request of said Market Participant.

Wheel-through transactions shall be treated as both an import and an export
transaction, and the relevant Market Participant shall be billed the sum of
both
financial impacts, as provided below.  This ECA shall not apply to import,
export, or wheel-through transactions that fail checkout due to NYISO error or
action, or neighboring control area operator error or action.

Rationale

Import Transactions: During the HAM resolution, BME reduces commitments for
energy  resources  within  NYCA  to  accept  scheduled  import transactions
at a
specific  proxy  bus  indicated  by the Market Participant.  Where the
scheduled
import  transaction  fails checkout following BME, the real-time energy price
at
the  proxy  bus  may  be  elevated  above the HAM price due to the failed
import
transaction.   The  difference  between the real-time price and the BME price
at
that  proxy  bus is currently charged to all purchasers in the real-time
market.
Under  this  ECA,  this  amount  (when  positive),  multiplied  by the number
of
megawatts  of  the  transaction  for  that  hour,  shall be billed to the
Market
Participant that scheduled the failed import transaction as the financial
impact
of causing the failure to complete checkout of the transaction.

Export  Transactions:  During the HAM resolution, BME makes commitments for
energy  resources  to  supply  scheduled  export transactions up to the
purchase
price  indicated  by the Market Participant at the appropriate proxy bus.
Where
the  scheduled  export  transaction  fails checkout following BME, the
real-time
energy  price  at  the proxy bus may be depressed below the HAM price due to
the
failed  export  transaction.   The  difference  between  the  BME  price and
the
real-time  price  at that proxy bus is currently charged to all loads as part
of
Schedule  1  costs.   Under this ECA, this amount (when positive), multiplied
by
the number of megawatts of the transaction for that hour, shall be billed to
the
Market Participant that scheduled the failed export transaction as the
financial
impact of causing the failure to complete checkout of the transaction.

Wheel-Through   Transactions:  During  the  HAM  resolution,  BME  includes
scheduled wheel-through transactions up to the transmission congestion cost
that
equals  the  decremental  bid  indicated  by  the Market Participant.  Where
the
scheduled  wheel-through transaction fails checkout following BME, the
real-time
energy  price  at  both  the  import  and export proxy busses may be elevated
or
depressed,  respectively,  due  to the effects on transmission congestion of
the
failed wheel-through transaction.  Under this ECA, the effects of the import
and
export  portions  of  the  failed  wheel-through  transaction will be
calculated
separately,  as though they were separate failed transactions.  The sum of
those
impacts  shall  be  billed  to  the Market Participant that scheduled the
failed
wheel-through  transaction  as  the  financial  impact of causing the failure
to
complete checkout of the transaction.

Implementation Rules

1.   An External Transaction for the delivery of energy to the NYCA at an
external Proxy Generator Bus that is scheduled in BME but for which no energy
is
delivered to the NYCA in real-time, will be settled by the scheduling entity
selling the amount of energy scheduled in BME into the LBMP Market at the
scheduling entity?s BME Bid Price, and buying the energy that was not
delivered
from the LBMP Market at the Real-Time LBMP prevailing at the external Proxy
Generator Bus.  No payment will be required of the scheduling entity if it is
shown that the External Transaction was properly scheduled in each Control
Area
and the energy was not delivered due to an error or action by the NYISO or the
delivering Control Area.  No payment will be required of, or made to the
Market
Participant if the Real-Time LBMP at the external Proxy Generator Bus is lower
than the BME Bid Price of the entity that failed to deliver scheduled energy.

2.   An External Transaction for the receipt of energy from the NYCA at an
external Proxy Generator Bus that is scheduled in BME but for which no energy
is
received from NYCA in real-time, will be settled by the scheduling entity
buying
the amount of energy scheduled in BME from the LBMP Market at the scheduling
entity?s BME Bid Price and selling the energy that was not taken into the LBMP
Market at the Real-Time LBMP at the external Proxy Generator Bus.  No payment
will be required by the scheduling entity if it is shown that the External
Transaction was properly scheduled in each Control Area and the energy was not
taken by the scheduling entity due to an error or action by the NYISO or the
receiving Control Area.  No payment will be required of, or made to the Market
Participant if the Real-Time LBMP at the external Proxy Generator Bus is
higher
than the BME Bid Price of the entity that failed to take scheduled energy.

3.   An External Transaction for the delivery of energy to the NYCA at one
external Proxy Generator Bus and the delivery of energy from the NYCA at a
different external Proxy Generator Bus that is scheduled in BME but for which
no
energy is delivered to or received from the NYCA in real-time, will be settled
by applying rules 1 and 2 of this ECA separately to the failed delivery of
energy to the import Proxy Generator Bus and the failed receipt of energy at
the
export Proxy Generator Bus, and summing the total of the two amounts for
payment
by the scheduling entity.  No payment will be required by the scheduling
entity
if it is shown that the External Transaction was properly scheduled in each
Control Area and the energy was not taken by the scheduling entity due to an
error or action by the NYISO or the delivering or receiving Control Area.  No
payment will be required of, or made to the Market Participant for the import
or
the export portion of the External Transaction if no payment would have been
required had that portion of the transaction been a separate transaction under
rule 1 or 2 of this ECA.

Issued:  December 8, 2000, 3:00 p.m.
Effective:  December 8, 2000, Operating Hour Beginning 0000


Thanks for the info.  I'll direct it to her the next time.

	Samuel Schott
	05/08/2001 05:24 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Stephanie Sever/Enron@EnronXGate, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 05-02-01 _ GCP Response - Attn. Global SAP

Hello Tana,

The Global SAP team (Cheryl Johnson) handles any Counterparty Name changes
upon receipt of support documentation from the Counterparty.
Please forward any such documentation to Cheryl Johnson.

Thanks,

Best Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890 (GCP Team)
Enron Net Works _ Global Data Management

From: Tana Jones on 05/08/2001 05:08 PM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa
Lees/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 05-02-01 _ GCP Response

Pursuant to the documentation the counterparty provided when they entered
into the power EEI, and at the direction of Marcus Nettelton, a lawyer in the
power group, the counterparty name for the Port of Oakland should set up in
GCP as follows:

The City of Oakland, a municipal corporation acting by and through its Board
of Port Commissioners

GCP, if you could please redo the counterparty name, and Stephanie, if you
could please resubmit the PA to match the counterparty name, then we can get
this one done...

	Samuel Schott
	05/03/2001 09:24 AM

		 To: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant
Reves/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Cynthia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON,
Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, EOL Call Center, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron,
Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON,
Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 05-02-01 _ GCP Response

Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in blue.

Best Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890 (GCP Team)
Enron Net Works _ Global Data Management

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 04:40 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 05-02-01

Please see attached.


Hello All;  Tom is flying to Alaska tomorrow Dec 15 and will be back
Xmas.
His telephone in Alaska is (907) 783-1291.  Also we have added a new phone
line here (630) 466-04420.  The other phone is operating (630) 466-4352.


Hi Nancy,

I need to bring you up-to-speed on where we are, and share some comments from
Virginia Power.  Please let me know a good time to visit.

Thanks,

Kay


Read about Enron's inclusion on the Gay Financial Network's "gfn.com 50" in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
FGT's Phase IV expansion
Clickpaper.com is added to two industry web sites
EES uses the 'Net to catch new customers
Learn what a swap is

It's all in the latest eBiz .  Go to home.enron.com , click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz May 11, 2001."


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Sally Beck

Date:		3/6/2001
Time:		11:00 AM - 11:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications on 11/17/00 09:44 AM
-----

	Milson Mundim
	11/17/00 09:10 AM

		 To: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Presidential elections...

----- Forwarded by Milson Mundim/Enron Communications on 11/17/00 09:16 AM
-----

	Bruno Messer@EES
	11/17/00 07:38 AM

		 To: Vikas Dwivedi/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher Ahn/NA/Enron@Enron, Andres
Balmaceda/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bora Bariman/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Stephen Benchluch/HOU/EES@EES, Ursula
Brenner/HOU/EES@EES, Dustin Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Roberto
Conterno/HOU/EES@EES, Sebastian Corbacho/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Philip
Durst/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Teresa Dyar/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Feitler/HOU/EES,
Daniel Ferrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Loftus Fitzwater/HOU/EES@EES, Edmund
Gaither/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt@ENRON, Santiago
Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Eduardo Gil/HOU/EES, Steve Gim/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Griffin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jaime Gualy/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, David Guillaume/NA/Enron@Enron, Roshena
Ham/NA/Enron@Enron, Pearce W Hammond/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George
Huan/HOU/EES@EES, Felipe Jens/Enron Communications@ENRON
COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON, Mike E Kelly/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Kimble/HOU/EES@EES, Sanjay Konur/NA/Enron@Enron, Ahmet Kose/HOU/EES@EES,
Kyu-Bong Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Enrique Lenci/HOU/EES@EES, Barry
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Fatimata Liamidi/NA/Enron@Enron, Ying
Liu/NA/Enron@ENRON, David Maskell/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Kelley McIntyre/NA/Enron@Enron, Abhijeet Naik/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Murli Nagwani/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Seung-Taek Oh/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Olalekan Oladeji/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan Pazos/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Peters/HOU/EES@EES, Philip Polsky/NA/Enron@Enron, Pauline Reyes/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Derrick Ross/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON,
Mark Schlueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Douglas Seaworth/HOU/EES@EES, Kim
Stanley/NA/Enron@Enron, Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Claude
Tellis/NA/Enron@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Yuan Tian/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, V
Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Tony Wolfe/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Richard Yeboah/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Kelli Little/NA/Enron@Enron, Naveed
Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Wood/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, j_araoz@hotmail.com@ENRON, s_benchluch@yahoo.com@ENRON,
Scott Baukney/NA/Enron@Enron, Vincent Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron,
jsmith18@enron.com@ENRON, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph
Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Bagwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Victor M
Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON, John B Gordon/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff M
Gray/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Jacobellis/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Loosley/NA/Enron@Enron, Aamir Maniar/NA/Enron@Enron, Massimo
Marolo/NA/Enron@Enron, Mauricio Mora/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladi
Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, Matt
Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Charles Wickman/NA/Enron@Enron, Erik Eller/Enron
Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON, John Kiani/HOU/EES@EES, Milson
Mundim/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON, Catherine
Simoes/HOU/EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT, Marcelo Meira/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Presidential elections...

http://www.theonion.com/onion3641/serbia_deploys_forces.html


FYI - - I have not heard back from John on this yet.  In light of current events, I do not expect to soon.  I will let you know when I hear from him.
Ed
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Commodity Structuring and Year End PRC

John,
I mentioned that I wanted to discuss the year-end PRC process as related to Commodity Structuring when I met with you in early September.  You said that the whole PRC process was being discussed/reviewed and that I should wait until November to discuss it with you.  I had intended to contact you next week to have the follow-up discussion, but Frank Vickers mentioned last week that the same (or a closely related) issue was recently discussed in one of your staff meetings and recommended that I share my thoughts with you now.  I do not know exactly what was discussed at your meeting, but the questions I want to discuss are as follows:
1.  Is Commodity Structuring properly placed on the "Commercial" table?
2.  If so, how does Commodity Structuring get equitable rankings and equitable compensation?
3.  If not, what table should Commodity Structuring be on and how should they be compensated?

I believe that the people in my group are "commercial" because the organization expects them to do the following:
Understand and structure any commodity transaction
See the "big picture," as well as the detail
Accurately and completely identify and cost/value all parts (risks and opportunities) in commodity transactions
Develop and propose alternate deal structures
Customer interface (with and without Originators) to field technical questions, negotiate technical issues and/or conduct due diligence
Review contracts, draft language, recommend changes and insure risk coverage therein
Collaborate with Research group to develop new models to price/value non-standard product offerings
Represent the desks in risk mitigation while negotiating with the desks to get fair/reasonable quotes
Make sure all the bases have been covered on a deal and that the deal value (including desk reserves, COF, credit, legal, etc.) matches the booking/unwind.

In essence, everything that an Originator should do, except considerably more technical in nature, but without primary customer relationships, deal identification responsibilities and specific profit goals.  I recognize that the exceptions are very important distinctions and do not want to infer that the roles are the same.  In fact, maybe it is the exceptions that determine the distinction.  However, commodity structuring, maybe more that any other single group, is hiring, training and developing individuals that regularly transition into "true" commercial seats (origination and training) at the request of the leaders of those groups.

I would like to fully discuss and get resolution before the PRC process gets underway.  Can we meet soon?  Please advise.

Regards,
Ed


Attached are three documents (cover memo, draft settlement proposal,
settlement procedures timeline) comprising SRP's formal proposal to resolve
five pending dockets, RP99-507 (Indicated Shippers' Complaint), RP00-336
(Order No. 637 Allocation and Pooling Issues only), RP99-139 (ONEOK
Complaint), RP01-484 (Indicated Shippers/California Complaint), and RP01-486
(Texas, New Mexico and Arizona Shippers' Complaint). We appreciate the
suggestions received to date and believe that while an uncontested
settlement may be unlikely, a sufficient nucleus is forming around the
elements of this proposal that will lead to the filing of an Offer of
Settlement and ultimate FERC approval as in the public interest.  We
encourage your active participation in this process.

Note that while Advisory Staff present at the July 18 Technical Conference
is aware conceptually that SRP will be distributing a settlement proposal,
this proposal has not been distributed to the Advisory Staff.  This proposal
has been sent to Rick Miles, Director, Dispute Resolution Services, for
informational purposes only at this time.

Joel L. Greene
Energy Advocates LLP
202-371-9889
202-371-9025 (fax)
jlgreene@energyadvocates.com
 <<SRP EPNG Settle.cvr.doc>>  <<SRP EPNG Capacity Proposal.06.26.doc>>
<<Proceduralschedule.doc>>

 - SRP EPNG Settle.cvr.doc
 - SRP EPNG Capacity Proposal.06.26.doc
 - Proceduralschedule.doc


This is ok.  I sold them 767 for the 27th and 28th.  I told Bryan to make
sure he doesn't need the 767 for the 29th - 31st.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000 09:21
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Joann Collins @ ENRON                           01/28/2000 07:28 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CKY 18-12 1/28 - 1/31

---------------------- Forwarded by Joann Collins/Corp/Enron on 01/28/2000
07:28 AM ---------------------------

mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/28/2000 06:52:20 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: "        -         *Swogger, Joanne" <jswogge@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Perrone, Brian" <bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>

Subject: CKY 18-12 1/28 - 1/31

I am requesting an additional 33 dth per day starting today going to the above
referenced ldc.   Please let me know the k# as soon as possible.   Thanks.


BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

-- "Significant new phase" involving combat forces under way in Afghanistan, senior administration official tells CNN. Details soon.

Watch CNN or log on to http://CNN.com /AOL Keyword: CNN for the latest news.
**********************************************************************
Watch CNN for the latest developments as America Strikes Back
including morning updates with Paula Zahn and an in-depth special
each weeknight at 10 p.m. ET with Aaron Brown
**********************************************************************
To unsubscribe from CNN.com's Breaking News E-Mail Alert, log on to:
http://cnn.com/EMAIL/breakingnews.html

Subscribe to CNN.com's daily news overview, weekly political review
or any CNN.com e-mail product at http://CNN.com/email
(c) 2001 Cable News Network, Inc.
An AOL Time Warner Company

CNN Interactive email id:393520070224403


Tony, the lawyer's name is Gary Herrmanns at Orrick.  His number is
415-773-5451.  Thanks for the message about Trey!  Michelle

Tony Jarrett@ENRON
03/20/2000 01:17 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Investment Partners Company Incentive Plan -- Second Draft
of Plan Document and Form Award Agreement

Michelle:

Will you please forward me the name and number of the attorney who suggested
we try to structure payments under this plan in a manner that would result in
capital gains treatment to participants?  Thanks.

Tony


John,

Rob and I are both in for golf on Sunday.

Chris


For your review.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/08/2000 05:04
PM ---------------------------

Jeff Blumenthal@ECT
06/06/2000 06:44 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc
Sabine/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

Kay and Brian,

In reply to Tim Lederach's e-mail below to Jeff Smith on June 6th, I have the
following comments:

1.  Regarding Tim's addition of the second and third sentences to my original
suggested language, it appears that there may be a misunderstanding.  Under
Mexican tax law, EEIM would be obligated to withhold tax on any payments it
makes to GE that are subject to Mexican withholding tax.  EEIM would submit
such amounts directly to the Mexican tax authorities and, in exchange, would
receive an official receipt (Official Form 37-A) that it could then forward
to GE.  It appears that Tim wants to ensure that GE obtains a copy of the
official receipt so that GE can claim a foreign tax credit on its U.S. income
tax return for any withholding tax to which payments it receives are subject
under Mexican tax law.  Tim's suggested additional language therefore needs
to modified to reflect that EEIM would pay the tax and could then provide GE
with the receipt.  I'd be glad to visit with Tim to discuss this matter.

2.  The language that I have proposed should be inserted in both the onshore
agreement and the offshore agreement.  Tim is proposing that it be inserted
(with his additional suggestions) only in the onshore agreement.

Please contact me at ext. 35777 if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Jeff

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           06/06/2000 06:09 PM

To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000 06:08
PM ---------------------------

jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/06/2000 06:08:59 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, tim.lederach@ps.ge.com,
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com, karl.siverling@ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

Kay,
See the proposed wording, below.  This is the only contract text issue I am
aware of.
Other than the items mentioned in my e-mail of June 1st/2nd (on the
consolidation agreement) and finalization of the "letter agreement" (you got
my fax), we are there.
Implied in the above, is that at this point I think the split agreement
approach would get us to closure faster.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Lederach, Timothy P (PS, Finance)
Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 4:12 PM
To:   Smith, Jeffrey E (PS, CommOps)
Subject:   RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

I have no problem with their proposed addition as it applies to the onshore
contract.  However, I would recommend modifying it as follows:

      If Purchaser is obligated to make any payment to Seller that
is subject to any withholding tax, then Purchaser shall remit the
appropriate withholding tax to the proper governmental authorities, and
Purchaser shall then remit the net amount of the payment (i.e., the gross
payment minus the applicable withholding tax) to Seller.  Seller agrees to
provide Purchaser with an original tax receipt, in Seller's name, indicating
remittance by the Purchaser of the amounts withheld.  Failure to provide
this receipt within a reasonable period of time will result in the amount
withheld becoming payable to the Seller.
Regards

Tim Lederach
GEPS Taxes

      -----Original Message-----
      From:   Smith, Jeffrey E (PS, CommOps)
      Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 2:43 PM
      To:   Lederach, Timothy P (PS, Finance)
      Subject:   FW: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)
      Importance:   High

      Tim,
      Enron wants to add this to the end of Clause 5.2.2.
Attached is the latest version of the On-Shore Contract for reference.
      Please let me know your opinion.
      We can talk to Enron about this if appropriate.
      Thanks,
      Jeff Smith
          << File: VITRO5-on-r1b.wpd >>

      -----Original Message-----
      From:   Brian D Barto [mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]
<mailto:[mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]>
      Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 2:23 PM
      To:   jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com
      Subject:   language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

      If Purchaser is obligated to make any payment to Seller that
is subject to any withholding tax, then Purchaser shall remit the
appropriate withholding tax to the proper governmental authorities, and
Purchaser shall then remit the net amount of the payment (i.e., the gross
payment minus the applicable withholding tax) to Seller.


Steve -

As we discussed, please find attached the final draft of the "talking points"
for the Call with Governor Gray Davis.

Thanks,

Joseph Alamo
Government Affairs
San Francisco CA


State Senate OKs bailing out Edison from bankruptcy
Assembly plans own version for utility
Lynda Gledhill and Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday, July 21, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/07/21/MN133267.DTL
Sacramento -- The state Senate approved a plan yesterday to keep Southern
California Edison from falling into bankruptcy, but the bill crafted as an
alternative to the pact between the utility and Gov. Gray Davis faces an
uncertain future.
The bill by Democratic Sens. Richard Polanco of Los Angeles and Byron Sher of
Palo Alto would give the state a five-year option to buy the utility's
transmission lines and would have the state guarantee no more than $2.5
billion of the utility's debt. Edison amassed an estimated $3.5 billion in
debt as wholesale electricity prices increased but retail rates remained
frozen.
The Assembly was also attempting to craft its own version of a deal last
night, but political maneuvering and fears of repeating the same kind of
mistakes that led to California's botched 1996 deregulation legislation
haunted lawmakers.
Davis continued to apply pressure on lawmakers to put a bill on his desk
before Aug. 15, a date set in the original agreement between Davis and
Edison.
Lawmakers were scheduled to start their monthlong summer recess last night,
but failure to pass the state budget meant no one was leaving town.
"It's a firm deadline, which means this issue has to be fully resolved prior
to the end of the legislative recess," Davis said of the Aug. 15 date.
Davis suggested that a conference committee or working group could be used to
iron out differences between the two bills, but it is unclear whether that
could be accomplished in the next few days.
"I have problems with both bills," Davis said. "I am heartened by the fact
that there's a bill moving in each house."
Both houses struggled to garner enough votes to get their respective bills to
a floor vote, and many lawmakers indicated that they were not happy with the
process.
In the Senate, 22 Democrats voted for the Edison plan, while four Democrats
and all 13 Republicans voted no.
Sen. Jackie Speier, D-Hillsborough, said she would vote for the bill in its
current form, but not if any substantial changes are made.
"The Legislature is ill-equipped to try to craft a deal," she said. "This
particular measure -- and only this one -- has the intent and clarity to
protect ratepayers. I'm leery of the bill going to the Assembly and being
cannibalized."
The Senate bill authorizes Edison to issue $2.5 billion in bonds to pay off
alternative energy producers and their banks. The bonds would be paid off
through increased rates charged Edison's largest customers and would not
cover the $1 billion Edison owes out-of-state generators.
Edison maintains that the Senate bill will not make the company creditworthy,
which would put it back in the position of buying power.
The state has been spending upward of $50 million a day on power since
January, and Davis and lawmakers want the rescue plan in place so that the
utility can once again begin buying power. There is also hope that any deal
would be used as a way to get Pacific Gas & Electric Co. out of bankruptcy.
In the Assembly, two competing measures put pressure on leaders to change
their bill. The rescue plan by Assembly Speaker Robert Hertzberg of Sherman
Oaks and Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek, was undergoing changes to
garner more support.
Some of the changes included eliminating the purchase of transmission lines
and taking municipal utilities out of the deal.
Assemblywoman Elaine Alquist, D-San Jose, one of the undecided members on the
Edison agreement, said the original bill was too complex.
"It's a cleaner bill," Alquist said. "I think it comes down to whether this
does not affect our constituents and there is not a link to PG&E. I would say
I'm tentatively satisfied."
Alquist and other Democrats said they were concerned about the rushed nature
of the Edison negotiations. Only a few members of the Assembly -- all former
state senators now in the lower house -- voted to approve the 1996
legislation, AB1890, that brought deregulation to California.
Assemblyman Joseph Simitian, D-Palo Alto, said he gave a courtesy vote to the
Hertzberg-Keeley plan in the Appropriations Committee, in order to get the
measure to the Assembly floor and continue debate.
"As we've learned from the experience of AB1890, the devil is in the details.
I have a lot of questions," Simitian said. "The difficulty is that very
little gets done here until there is a deadline, and then once there is a
deadline, too much gets done."
Hertzberg acknowledged that some Assembly members were afraid the bill was
getting rushed, but he said lawmakers are well-informed about the energy
crisis and its details. He said they have had 200 hours of caucus meetings
and countless hearings on the crisis.
A wild card in the Assembly's plan was a bill by Assemblyman Rod Wright, D-
Los Angeles, that garnered Republican support. The so-called "straight
bailout" would give Edison its $3.5 billion through a $2-a-month fee levied
on utility ratepayers. It was stuck in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.
E-mail the reporters at lgledhill@sfchronicle.com and
rsalladay@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 3


The attached  response was properly filed and served, but, inadvertantly, was not served on  LISTSERV.

 - REPSONSE TO ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER.wpd


Hello All-

Attached above are the cover letter and proposed tariff sheets filed by Texas
Eastern yesterday for a June 1 effective date.  The rate changes reflect
under recoveries in their ASA account which tracks their cash-out mechanism
and increased cost of system fuel.  The underrecovery in the ASA account has
increased from $22,000 to over $22,000,000 over the period September 1--March
31.  Texas Eastern claims that this is largely a result of the gaming of
their currently monthly cash-out (which will likely be changed to weekly in
their 637 proceeding).  As a result, Texas Eastern is seeking a waiver of the
annual filing period in order to begin collecting the underrecovery through a
surcharge that would amount to as much as $.0354 from ELA-M3.  Texas Eastern
proposes to begin recovery in June so as to extend the recovery period from
12 months (Dec-Nov) to 18 months (Jun-Nov), which will lower the level of the
surcharge.

We'll review the filing to see if there are any grounds for protest /
comment.  These types of dollars are usually "rubber-stamped" by FERC for
pass-through but the filing to change the recovery time period may give us
some grounds to protest the recovery.

 The full filing can be found at :
http://infopost.link.duke-energy.com/infopost/default.asp?pipe=TE

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional
information.

Thanks,
Suzanne


There is a position available in Deal Control, reporting to Jeff Richter on the Short-Term California desk.  If you are interested in applying, please contact Amy FitzPatrick by close of business Friday, May 4, 2001.

Following is a summary of the responsibilities associated with this position.

Facilitate the entry of West Power deals, including short-term and long-term desks and the services desk, into the trading systems.
Follow-up with Deal Clearing and Settlements groups in Houston to verify accuracy of trades in the system.  This includes timely follow-up  with the traders for clarification.
Ensure that all trades are entered by a daily deadline.
Calculate and report weighted averages of daily price and volume to Dow Jones.
Prepare and distribute daily reports to ensure all books are balanced and report discrepancies to management.
Track and report daily and monthly error discrepancies to management and deliver reports for possible solutions to rectify errors.
Calculate weighted averages between brokered trades and trades executed through Enron OnLine and the Intercontinental Exchange.
Report any technical mishaps to appropriate personnel in Houston and track computer problems until demonstrated resolutions.
Test any updated versions of applications requested by programmers and report back any adjustments needed.

Additional attributes one must possess to succeed in this position are persistence and a positive attitude.  Working knowledge of Microsoft Excel is essential, as is a general software aptitude.

If you have any questions regarding this role, please see either Jeff or Amy.


Simon:

Sorry about the delay.

I know we subscribe to various information services from Bloomberg and
Reuters, but I am not aware of any relationship we have with Thomson
Financial - then again that's not too surprising.  I suggest you talk to the
people in investor relations and maybe the Info Central people who may have
subscribed to such services.  The only way I would have heard about them
would be if they were to be used for EnronOnline or in the highly unlikely
event that they had consulted me on the subscription contracts.  Please feel
free to call if I can be of any other help.

Mark (x37459)

	Simon Duff
	07/12/2000 07:39 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT, Maria Raftery/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard J
Black/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FirstCall Information Service

Mark

I understand that you oversee the legal issues/contracts relating to our
financial trading activities and consequently was hoping you might be able to
assist us in regard to the following query that relates to sourcing data from
external financial information providers.

I work in EnronCredit.com as a Telecommunication analyst and am interested in
accessing the above information source which is provided by Thomson
Financial.  FYI, "FirstCall" allows online realtime access to a wide variety
of debt and equity focused investment house/broker reports.

We originally had access via a trial that was apparently initiated by a "C.
Weber" who was based out of Houston but who has subsequently left the company.

Unfortunately, access to this service has been withdrawn by Thomson Financial
here in London on the basis that we are a "corporate" and not a "financial"
or "fund manager".  Thomson Financial are now offering us a reduced
time-delayed service ("Investex") which is not sufficient for our needs and
consequently we would like to reestablish the FirstCall service or a service
providing similar or superior functionality.

Prior to meeting with Thomson, I would very grateful if you could enlighten
us on any of the following:

- Whether Enron has any relationship and/or agreements in place with Thomson
Financial in the US;
- If the latter is the case, which services we receive from this data
supplier;
- If this is not the case, which alternative but similar data services we do
receive.

I believe that if we can establish that we already receive the FirstCall
service in the US it would greatly strengthen our case for receiving it here
in the UK.  Alternatively, if we do not receive this service in the US it
would be extremely valuable for us to know what alternative, but similar,
sources of information are available, in order that we might have another
option should Thomson Financial prove to be inflexible on the issue of
supplying FristCall.

Should you have any queries in relation to any of the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me either by return or on the direct number below.

Thanks for your help with this.

Regards

Simon Duff (## 44 20 7783 4585)


Just a reminder, we are have the meeting today at 8:30 in EB3749.

  Daren, if you have time, please join us in this meeting.  You may be able
to help us resolve some of these issues.  Thanks

Thu

3-7159

---------------------- Forwarded by Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000 08:03 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Thu Nguyen                           01/27/2000 08:47 AM

To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MidTex Meeting Feb 1, 2000

Please plan to attend this meeting on MidTex Pipeline, which will cover the
scheduling of HPL's transportation expense on MidTex and purchases off of
this pipeline.

O'Neal:  This relates to the deals I have asked you to modify.  If you have
further questions, they can be address at the meeting.

  Room:  EB3749
  Time:  8:30 - 9:30

Thanks

Thu
3-7159


Frank,

Thanks a lot. Look forward to meeting you again
on campus.

Vince

"Frank Qian" <fqian@andrew.cmu.edu> on 11/05/2000 05:10:06 PM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Thank you!

Dear Mr. Kaminski:

It's a great pleasure to have you visiting us and a great honor to have
dinner with you. I'd like to thank you for your wonderful presentation. It's
the most interesting topic we had so far. This is not just my personal
opinion, all my classmates I talked to agree with me.  I like Enron's style
and culture and I think it played a big role in Enron's success. I look
forward to discuss career opportunities at Enron during your on-campus
interview session.

Regards,

Frank Qian
fqian@andrew.cmu.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron on 07/11/2002 07:42
AM ---------------------------

	Tom Nemila
	07/10/2002 05:54 PM

To: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Work Req.


thanks

To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Exxon credit

I will get this to you tomorrow morning.

	Brant Reves
	02/12/2001 04:04 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gregory Schockling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Exxon credit

Gerald,

Anyway we can move this up on your action items?

thanks
brant

Gregory Schockling@ENRON
02/12/2001 03:57 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Exxon credit

BRant,

I got a call from my contact at Exxon regarding the PG your working on.
Vicki Brown needs the paprework as soon as possible, they only have 2 days of
credit left with us and we're buying some day gas from them.

Let me know the status or if I can help

Thanks

Greg Schockling


Todd:

At last, I am attaching our response to your comments of 7/19/01, together with a clean and blacklined draft of the ISDA Master Agreement for Georgia Power Company.  Please note that these same comments will apply for Savannah Electric and Mississippi Power with the exceptions set forth in our response.

Please let us know if you have any questions or additional comments.  We look forward to hearing your comments.

Marie

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com


Drew, here's an excerpt from a FERC letter order accepting for filing a
nonconforming agreement filed
by Dynegy Midstream...sounds a little bit like what the TW guys are trying to
do, if I understand the
concept of volumetric rates correctly.  Left a message for my friend at DMP
but he (like everyone else)
is out 'til next year.  But since there were no subsequent orders issued in
the docket I assume there were
no problems with the filing.

I'm still leaning towards recommending the $0 demand/ $0.02 commodity + file
as nego. rate approach.
If Steve Harris is OK with the idea of doing a deal that requires filing, I
will draft something and send it your way.

* * *
The referenced negotiated transaction provides for a transportation service
under DMP's Rate Schedule
FTS. Rather than paying a reservation charge, the negotiated agreement
specifies that KGS will pay
a volumetric rate. The volumetric rate will equal DMP's maximum interruptible
transportation service rate as
set forth in DMP's tariff. . .The contract also (a) specifies five Dth/d as
KGS' maximum daily reservation
quantity, (b) lists KGS' primary receipt as Meter # 9999999 and (c)
identifies five primary delivery points for
KGS. . . Upon filing Docket No. RP99-240-000, DMP stated that it agreed to
the above negotiated rate so
that KGS could serve small residential customers on DMP's system under a firm
rate schedule.


To signatories to the Comprehensive Settlement:

ALJ Biren has given us until Friday of this week (April 28, 2000) to file
"errata" to the Comprehensive Settlement.

So far, I am planning to make the following non-substantive changes:

1.  The table of contents was seriously messed up by an "automatic update"
feature in Word just before we duplicated and filed.  I will be putting it
back to the state you saw in the final draft.

2.  On p.7, section 1.12, put a period at the end of the last sentence.

3.  On p.9, section 1.1.3.1,  two thirds of the way down the page, I will be
changing "subject to adjustment annual by the base rate PBR formula" to
"subject to adjustment annually by the base rate PBR formula".

4. On p.27, section 1.5.4, in the third full paragraph on the page, I will
be changing "If only one customer has an OFO day" to "If only one customer
class has an OFO day".

5.  Also on p.27, section 1.5.4, bottom line on the page, I will be filling
in the blank with "C" (so it reads "Appendix C")

In the category of "maybe substantive",

1.  On p.10, section 1.1.3.2, three lines from the bottom of the page, the
date "October 1, 2000" would be changed to "October 1, 2001".  This sentence
refers to including the cost of backbone transmission for core customers
buying gas from SoCalGas in the "procurement" rate.  Obviously, our intent
was to do that only once we had unbundled backbone transmission, which
happens on October 1, 2001.

In the category of "substantive":

1.  Our capacity term sheet had said that we would unbundled "additional"
(non-reliability) storage for CTAs effective upon implementation of the
settlement (See p.4).  The filed settlement managed to drop the section that
provided for this option for CTAs prior to the principal storage change on
April 1, 2001.  (The filed settlement is ok for the period starting April 1,
2001).  So, to be consistent with the term sheet, we need to insert
something back into the settlement to allow CTAs to opt out of
non-reliability storage in the period from the effective date (90 days after
approval) to April 1, 2001.  Obviously, this may not be a very long period.
John Leslie has suggested inserting at the very beginning of Section
5.4.4.3:  "In the partial storage year beginning on the effective date of
this Settlement Agreement, and....[continue with current text]."  We would
need to cover as part of implementation filings the exact mechanism/pricing
for SoCalGas purchasing gas in storage owned by CTAs if they opt out of
nonreliability storage prior to April 1. 2001.  SoCalGas and SDG&E are ok
with John's language and want to make sure it is ok with other signatories.

If you have any problems with any of these changes, please contact me or
Brian Cherry by noon on Friday, April 28.  My email is gsullivan@sempra.com
and my phone is (619) 699-5162.  Brian's email is bcherry@sempra.com and
phone is (213) 244-3895.

We are looking at the possibility of two or three additional changes, and
Brian may send you a follow-up message.

-- Glen Sullivan
Sempra Energy Law Dept.


Following our Ft. Pierce meeting this morning, Ozzie Pagan's called me and
requested a "physical basis" offer for the following deal.  This request is
the answer to the question David Fairley was going to ask the power guys.
Neither the FGU RFP  nor the current Ft. Pierce supply option will impact the
deal's need for this offer.

Term:  (1) 6/02 - 5/03 (the proposed phase 6 in-service date)
  (2) 6/02 - 12/03 (phase 6 delay insurance)

Quantity: 37,000 MMBtu/d (est. based on 200 MW @ 7,700 HR)

Location: at the plant

If you have any questions, please ask.

Regards,
Ed


Mark,

  Per Brandon's request, please use this ID for your contact to view our site.

  Your Username is -  INTMTAYL
  Your password is - WELCOME.

  Note that both the Username and Password are CASE SENSITIVE.

  If you have any problems or questions,  please call me at 3-6150

Thanks-
Camille


sure does.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bruce Gilbert-Smith <gilsmith@gilsmith.demon.co.uk>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 11:00 AM
To:	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:

7 Jan 2002

does this still work?
Sally Gilbert-Smith


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
03:41 PM ---------------------------

Robert Brooks <rebrooks@earthlink.net> on 04/19/2000 12:39:57 PM
Please respond to "rebrooks@rbac.com" <rebrooks@rbac.com>
To: "'GPCM Distribution'" <rebrooks@rbac.com>
cc:
Subject: Gas Price Analysis from Powermarketers.com

Interesting article.  Analysis sees production and import increases this
year, perhaps not quite keeping up with demand increases.
Take a look.

http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMAKRT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/knightri
dder/2000/04/18/krtbn/0000-0087-HO-GAS-ENERGY

Bob Brooks


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
09:22 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 09:19 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/6/01


Tana - I met with Francis today and he will make the changes that you
requested to the Nymex report.  Please call if you have any questions or
comments.

Thanks,
Susan
x3-1462