mary let's discuss this afternoon. linda calling you to set up call with
astin/joel/angela (re hanover) to discuss some tweaking/practical issues.

 Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com

	Mary Cook
	02/28/2001 10:54 AM

		 To: Joel Ephross/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON
		 cc: Brenda L Funk/ENRON@enronXgate, George McKean/NA/Enron@Enron, Gordon
McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron
Baker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: assignment of trade to Raptor vehicle

1.  We should not terminate.  Sara will call Joel to discuss.

2. If the Raptor process documentation I prepared several months ago (and to
which we all agreed) is being altered, it would be appreciated if the swap
attorneys and Lisa Mellencamp could be a part of discussing changes, and
minimally, be advised of any changes.

Thank you.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Joel Ephross/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/28/2001 09:15 AM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: George McKean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron Baker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brenda L
Funk/ENRON@enronXgate, Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: assignment of trade to Raptor vehicle

I assume that what this e-mail relates to is the discussed "transfer" of the
2 LDC swaps from Raptor 2 to Raptor 4. Frankly, I do not know what it means
to assign a swap from 1 of these vehicles to another vehicle. I think that in
general the schedules to the ISDAs that each of the 2 sets of parties
executed are the same, but what happens in the case of differences? My rather
simplistic approach would be to terminate the existing swaps in Raptor 2 and
execute new swaps at the same time and on the same terms in Raptor 4.

Unless anyone objects, I propose that we proceed along the lines outlined
above, using the Raptor process documentation developed by Lisa and recently
updated by Gordon.

We recently [like yesterday] received closing books on Raptor 3 and
distributed those. If Anyone needs documentation on the other 3 structures,
let us know....[Realizing that they are about to change due to the planned
merger of Raptor 1, 2 and 4 into Mega-Raptor -- sounds like a bad Rug-Rats
movie I recently had the misfortune of viewing doesn't it?]
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Cook, Mary
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 8:29 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Ephross, Joel
Subject: Re: assignment of trade to Raptor vehicle

No.  I guess the first step is to know into which Raptor the swaps are moving
and to get Joel to give us a closing book on that Raptor so we can get the
correct parties etc.  Attached is an assignment/assumption document I drafted
for the VPP transaction which might be helpful (of course, it has a lot of
inapplicable specifics) .    We ought to also check with Joel about any
provisions in the rest of the vehicle docs that may apply to an assignment.
I would think that if all parties join and consent and provide no ED or TE
under the ISDAs shall occur on the basis of the assignment that it would be
clean from the ISDA point of view.  Mary

 << File: assignment Brazos Pres 2.doc >>

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton 02/28/2001 08:21 AM 	   To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:
Subject: assignment of trade to Raptor vehicle

Mary:

Do you have a form of "approved" assignment for transferring trades into the
Raptor vehicle?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Please see attached memo.  This is still a draft.  Jim has asked me to
schedule a conference call about this.  Lysa - please set up the call.


Stephanie, please put this in rotation.  One of the Paralegals can prepare
the first draft of an amendment.  Mary

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 10:07 AM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	05/04/2001 04:18 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: AEP Energy Services, Inc. - ISDA

To all,

AEP has recently stopped signing our Financial Confirmations due to the fact
that the ISDA Master shows that they are the confirming party.  We have never
signed their confirmations, nor do they even send confirmations currently.
AEP has indicated that they would be willing to amend the Master for the
confirming party to be Enron.  Can one of you please start this ball rolling?

Thanks,
Joe


Dan, Brent, Shari -

Please let me know as soon as possible what the status of your review of the
True Quote site is as we are getting closer to the anticipated completion
date of March 12 - Monday.

I have already prepared comments to the access agreements for the site, but
need to have your comments, if any, to present all Enron comments.

Thanks for the assistance.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 08:53 AM -----

	Mark Greenberg
	03/01/2001 09:24 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: truequote.com legal product descriptions

Dan, Brent, Shari -

We have been asked to review the provisions of Truequote - a third party
trading platform - on which Enron may possibly trade.  I have requested
access for each of you to the site (www.truequote.com) and hope to have this
for each of you a bit later today.  In order to get you started, I have
provided the general product descriptions below.

The use of this system is in conjunction with another deal we are currently
working on with Truequote which will enable counterparties to hit Enron
posted prices and transact with Enron through the Truequote site.

Timing on this matter is rather tight as we need to finalize all agreements
and be ready to begin using the Truequote site on Monday, March 12.
Therefore, please initiate a review of the descriptions pertinent to your
area as soon as possible so that I can coordinate any comments you may have
with my general comments to the access agreement.  Travis is also working on
a piece of this deal and will be interested in your comments.

Thanks to each of you.  If you should need anything further, please do not
hesitate to call me.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 09:08 AM -----

	Bob Shults@ECT
	03/01/2001 08:53 AM

		 To: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg
		 cc:
		 Subject: truequote.com legal product descriptions

---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 08:54 AM
---------------------------

"Trevor Atkins" <trevor.atkins@truequote.com> on 02/28/2001 02:55:16 PM
To: <bob.shults@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: truequote.com legal product descriptions

Please find attached a copy of the legal product descriptions that you
requested.  If you have any questions, please feel to contact me at
800-327-1499.  The passwords and userids will be ready for you shortly.

Thank you,

Trevor L. Atkins

Trevor L. Atkins
Project Manager
True Quote, LLC
work:  (502) 212-4900 or (800) 327-1499
direct:  (502) 212-4912
fax:  (502) 212-4907
email:  trevor.atkins@truequote.com

 - Product Descriptions - TQ 9.doc


Pavel,

We shall talk to him. He looks like a very qualified
candidate.

Vince

From: Pavel Zadorozhny on 01/12/2001 01:40 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: asking for advice regarding Summer Associate position at Enron

Gentlemen,

Here is a guy who is looking for a summer associate position. I looked at his
resume and think that he may be worth talking to.

Pavel
---------------------- Forwarded by Pavel Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
01:37 PM ---------------------------

Dmitri Villevald <Dmitri.Villevald@owen2002.vanderbilt.edu> on 01/03/2001
06:56:54 PM
To: "Pavel Zadorozhny (E-mail)" <pavel.zadorozhny@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: asking for advice regarding Summer Associate position at Enron

Dear Mr. Zadorozhny:

Maxim Philippov suggested that I write you. Being a first-year MBA student
at Owen Graduate School of Management (Vanderbilt University) with a Finance
concentration, I am looking for a Summer Associate position at Enron.

The area of my particular interest is Enron's risk management products
(commodity derivatives research and trading). Graduating from Novosibirsk
State University with major in physics, I am eager to apply my experience
with the use of theoretical and statistical physics techniques to the
managing of modeling processes and creating complex financial and trading
models. I strongly believe that my graduate education coupled with
undergraduate background in physics, solid work experience in finance and
proven entrepreneurial spirit will allow me to contribute to Enron as a
Summer Associate.

I would really appreciate your advice regarding employment opportunities at
Enron and would like to find out more about Enron Capital & Trade Resources
Corp. I will call you within this week to follow up on my request.

Thank you very much for your time.

Sincerely,

Dmitri Villevald

Enclosure: resume

 <<Resume.doc>>
P.S. Looking through an example of margin risk hedging at Enron's Web site,
I think I found a small mistake there. URL of this page is

<http://www.ect.enron.com/products/risk/margin_intro.fset.html> (producer
application)

The second sentence of the paragraph beginning with "Paradigm and Enron
exchange..."
states the following.

For example, if the actual margin is $1.25/MMBtu for a given month, then
Paradigm will pay Enron $0.13/MMBtu. Alternatively, if the actual margin is
$2.00/MMBtu, then Enron will pay Paradigm $0.62/MMBtu.

I believe, if I am reading it correctly, the money should flow in the
opposite direction, namely:

For example, if the actual margin is $1.25/MMBtu for a given month, then
Enron will pay Paradigm $0.13/MMBtu. Alternatively, if the actual margin is
$2.00/MMBtu, then Paradigm will pay Enron $0.62/MMBtu.

Am I right?

Again, thank you very much for your time.

 - Resume.doc


(See attached file: HPLN1214.xls)

 - HPLN1214.xls


Do you have an email address for him?


Bus passes for January are now available at the Parking and Transportation office on the third floor of the Enron Building, ECN 306.  These passes are offered on a monthly basis and are provided at no charge to the Enron employee. However, because these buses passes are fully subsidized they must be treated as "taxable" income. Excluding the first $65 of the bus pass, the remaining value is subject to taxation, collectively referred to as "imputed tax". See example below

Example: A $100 pass is chosen by an employee.

Subsidy for Bus Pass		$100.00
Exclusion amount			$  65.00

Taxable Income amount		$  35.00


i emailed her.  i will call her this weekend.  i think she left town
yesterday and i haven't been home at all this week.  i have a very active
social life.


Please find attached the Global Markets Monitor for the week ending 02 November 2001.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda
and Gwyn Koepke


Attached are the following documents in further support of Agenda Item 5B,
ICAP, at the December 12, 2000 Business Issues Committee meeting:

1. A motion that the Stage 1A Proposed ICAP Tariff be approved;and
2. A  motion that the Stage 1A Proposed ICAP Tariff Section 5.12.10 be
amended as set out in the motion, attaching
 a. Proposed Section 5.12.10 blacklined against the current Tariff
(one page) and
 b. Proposed Section 5.12.10 blacklined against the Stage 1A Proposed
ICAP Tariff (one page).

NYISO Staff will be available at the meeting to explain the proposed change
and answer questions. The purpose of the proposed change is to reflect
operations accurately in the Stage 1A language.

Thanks.

Kathy Robb <<Agenda.DOC>>  <<Dec. 10 BIC Meeting NYISO Staff Motion on
5.12.10(v4).DOC>>
Hunton & Williams
212.309.1128
krobb@hunton.com

 - Agenda.DOC
 - Dec. 10 BIC Meeting NYISO Staff Motion on 5.12.10(v4).DOC


The deal at mtr 8663 in April was not a spot deal.  This was a Gas Daily Firm
agreement under the term contract with Southern Union, deal 72349.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Karen Lindley @ ENRON                           06/14/2000 07:03 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal Number

Darren,

I understand that you can tell me the deal number for a spot deal you set up
for meter 988663 for 4/4-4/9 for Janet Wallis.

Let me know if you need any additional information from me.

Thanks!

Karen


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 03:01
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jared Kaiser                           10/26/2000 04:19 PM

To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:19
PM ---------------------------

Joe A Casas
10/26/2000 04:12 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen@CCMAIL
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           10/26/2000 03:40 PM

To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin
Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Christina Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

While we wait for Unify to work.....here's a funny!!!!

 - Evilke~1.mpe


Matt,

Why do I have to pay for the cranes at GE's factory to get the turbine on a
rail car?  Section 10.2 1 states that the Seller shall be responsible for
loading Purchaser's mode of transportation upon arrival to the Delivery Point.

Also, I would expect crane would also be available at New Port News (major
shipyard) and Houston to off-load the turbine and or generator.

Chris

Matthew Tezyk@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/01/2001 11:51 AM
To: Chris Booth@ENRON
cc: Fred Mitro@ECT, Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Fred L
Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben F Jacoby@ECT

Subject: Cost Breakout for Blue Dog #1 storage

Chris,

In response to your inquiry, the following is the cost breakout for the GE
storage quote:

$50,000 = Long Term Preservation Procedures on the GTG
$198, 000 = Transportation to the storage yard (contract ref: Exhibit N-1)
$78,500 = Handling Costs (cranes) to upload on the method of transportation
$78,500 = Handling Costs (cranes) to offload in the storage yard
$64,000 = Storage costs through 30 JUN 01 (16k per month for MAR, APR, MAY, &
JUN)

TOTAL = $469,000

Costs that are incurred "up-front" are 1,2,3,& 4.  After discussing this with
GE, this is their Lump Sum price.


deadline 7 a.m. tomorrow morning.  Send to Eric Groves
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001
02:07 PM ---------------------------
From: Eric Groves/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 08:11 AM
To: Mark Fondren/ENRON@enronXgate, Rajib Saha/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Swinney/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Earnest/ENRON@enronXgate, William E
Kasemervisz/ENRON@enronXgate, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tomas
Tellez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Pennix/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/ENRON@enronXgate, Patrick Stafford/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Massey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin
Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
egroves1111@hotmail.com@SMTP@enronXgate, "John (E-mail)"
<jholland-kdi@cox-internet.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Jen (E-mail)"
<jennifer.battey@corning.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Geoff (E-mail)"
<Geoffrey.McIntyre@Daltile.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Mason Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Spector/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, "Mom (E-mail)"
<cgroves@frostbank.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Simon Thurbin/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Cross/ENRON@enronXgate, Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allen B
Childress/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Loosley/NA/Enron@Enron, Mo Bawa/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brian O'Rourke/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: 2001 Masters Pool

The Azaleas are blooming and the greens are fast. The Masters are here.  More
importantly the Masters pool is back. Sorry for the short notice, but what
would a major be without the pool. Please invite others.$20 each. Fill out in
Excel and return email the saved file (or hardcopy to me 2986b).

PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR NAME ON THE ENTRY FORM.
RULES IN ATTACHED FILE. GOOD LUCK.


you mean communicate the fact that mark views me as wholly expendable?  i'm
hurt, mark.

best,
jeff

	Richard Shapiro
	07/05/2001 03:32 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dunn Subpoena

Please communicate or distribute as you see fit. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001
03:32 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Palmer on 07/05/2001 02:28 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Dunn Subpoena

Fighting the kangaroo court actually got us some points with the media.  If
we can continue without getting anyone (other than Dasovich) thrown in jail,
let's fight.

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 07/05/2001 02:27 PM -----

	Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/05/2001 02:20 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/Enron@enronXgate, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Dunn Subpoena

The Dunn Committee will be taking up the contempt citations again on Tuesday,
July 10.  We are currently contemplating two actions.   First, we intend to
offer to produce some documents, most notably the ISO bid data sought (which
the Committee already has anyway).  Secondly, as we do not expect this
voluntary partial production to placate the Committee, we are preparing an
action to file in federal court in Sacramento on Monday challenging the
subpoena to the extent it seeks to require the production of documents other
than those we offered to produce.  Robin Gibbs and Mike Kirby are on board
with this.  Please let me know if would like any additional information about
these matters.  Thank you.


The usual payment terms of PDVSA are 30 days after bill of lading.  We should pay Enron, who is our seller, 30 days after bill of lading plus monthly adjustments accordingly to market index movement.  We are better protected by paying as we did on the last cargo.  We should follow Paul's recommendations which are being discussed with Suzanne and her group.

Our cash flow forecast shows that we will be short by $800M depending on the market index movements and after paying $397M of import tax, $156M of rent and $164M of property tax.

Saludos

Paul Y'Barbo@ENRON
05/04/2001 04:10 PM
To:	Greg Curran/CA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Miguel Maltes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Javier Chavarria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico Haeussler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Suzanne B Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mariella Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:	Re: Next Cargo

If we worked out a price structure similar to the last cargo, we could eliminate the price risk by paying the following for the LPG:

1400 MT at a Fixed Price (represents amount borrowed that went to April sales)
2900 MT based on May Mont Belvieu plus Premium 1
2800 MT based on June Mont Belvieu plus Premium 2 and
2900 MT based on July Mont Belvieu plus Premium 3

The Fixed Price for 1400 MT and the Premiums 1,2, and 3 are under discussion with Suzanne. This structure matches the cost of product with ProCaribe's sales revenue.

Question: How does ProCaribe get paid for the 15 days of product that goes with the Progasco sale?

Paul

Greg Curran
05/04/2001 02:45 PM
Sent by:	Greg Curran
To:	Miguel Maltes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:	Javier Chavarria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Curran/CA/Enron@Enron, Federico Haeussler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron, Suzanne B Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mariella Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:	Re: Next Cargo

Please explain how we will manage the price risk on this.  Remeber that we have to give 15 days worth of product with the sale of  Progas.  What are the payment terms?  How are you with cash?

Miguel Maltes@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/04/2001 02:12 PM
To:	Javier Chavarria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:	Greg Curran/CA/Enron@Enron, Federico Haeussler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron, Suzanne B Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Next Cargo

Our next cargo has a loading window in PDVSA on May 18, 2001, with an ETA in ProCaribe on May 19 - 21, 2001.  The cargo is for 10,000 Mts. (5.2MM gallons) at MB + 7 three days around bill of lading.  This means that the invoice will be the average price of MB on the loading day, the day before and the day after, excluding weekends and holidays, plus 7 cents a gallon.

The following are the monthly sales average per customer:

* Progasco		1,100,000 gallons
* San Juan Gas 	   210,000 gallons
* Centro Gas                  140,000 gallons

Total borrowing return to EcoEl?ctrica 3,200 Mts or 1,667,200 gallons on 5/19/01.

After returning all the borrowing (5/19/01) we have a balance of 3,480,233 gallons.  The following are the estimated sales and heater consumption per month:

* May (12 days)    563,520 gallons (from May 20th through May 31st)
* June (30 days)  1,408,800 gallons
* July  (31 days)  1,455,760 gallons

Inventory balance as of: 7/31/01 (52,153 gallons).

Next cargo arrival delivery window July 20 - 31, 2001.

Saludos

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


Steve, this may change our strategy but we could probably still sound off on
the BGE lawsuit.
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Frank/NA/Enron on 08/31/2000 04:15
PM ---------------------------

bmoss@gcwdc.com@gcwdc.com on 08/31/2000 02:27:49 PM
To: cynthia.sandherr@enron.com, ltarbet@enron.com, bvotaw@enron.com,
rfrank@enron.com, jcarr@enron.com
cc: anavin@enron.com, Ksaunder@enron.com

Subject: Update on Legislative situation re Hefley amendment

This should be kept confidential.

I am advised from one staff source, who is involved in the House-Senate
negotiations, of the following:

--House and Senate staff met yesterday to discuss the Hefley amendment;

--They agreed to try a certain approach;

--Phil Grone (Rep Hefley's staffer) will prepare a written 'offer' for the
Senate staff;

--That offer might be the Senate amendment plus statutory language
authorizing the Secretary to select/mandate certain state health and safety
regualtions to follow;

--The 'offer' is expeced between now and next Tuesday (9/5);

--There will be a Members meeting on this and other issues next Wednesday
(9/6);

--DOD has not yet signed off (and in fact there is no agreement until
everyone see the language -- and there is always the possibility that Grone
might try to broaden the language to include other susbjects).

--IF there is House, Senate and DOD agreement, the issue could be resolved
at the Members meeting; however, nothing is written in stone until the
Congress actually votes on the Defense Authorization Conference Report.

CONCLUSIONS I reach:

1. We should be careful of any activity that would pressure Mr. Hefley, his
staff or make this a personal issue between now and next Wednesday; let
Grone prepare his 'offer'.

2.  We may want to slow-walk the Tom White/Dick Cheney call until we get a
better handle from DOD and Hill staff on developments over the next few
days.

3. We should continue broad-based yet low-key efforts between now and next
Wednseday to show support for the Senate position -- targeting key
Senators/staff and selected House Memebers/staff -- utilizing CSA, COOPs
and BENZ, at al.; keep the Enron profile low.

4.  We need to talk re how to assure that we have imput to DOD's review of
the Grone 'offer'; the TomWhite/CSA meeting with Secretary Yim may be
timely.

5.  If there is an acceptable agreement our strategy changes to one of
holding it.

6. I will run the traps again tomorrow and report if new information.

7.  We will all talk Tuesday at 0900 EST.


Hey Wilson,

Yep, I'm still in Houston for the time being...I'll probably be here through
March of next year when my current rotation ends.  Everything's going pretty
well, work is still consisting of long hours but I think ultimately the hard
work is going to pay off.  In fact, the whole London thing is looking pretty
good right now.  There might be an opportunity for me to get into some
structuring and originating roles over there which is much more along the
lines of where I'd like to go (versus this whole trader support thing - great
experience for the time being, but definitely not a permanent role).  Glad to
hear things are still well with you.  Sounds like you're still the same old
Wilson...working deals and hooking-up.  You'll have to let me know when
you're going to be in town so we can get the gang together to go out.  It
looks like Darren's going to be back in town for about 6 weeks or so coming
up so hopefully we could all make a steak night reunion.

I've been going out quite a bit as well and have had a couple dates, but
nothing really to speak of.  I was kind of on a rampage over the last month
just messing with guys heads (flirting, getting them to buy me drinks, giving
them my number and then completely ignoring them).  I think it was some need
I had to treat your entire gender like shit.  I'm pretty much over it
though.  It's not really in my nature to be like that, just a reactionary
thing for having been treated like crap myself.

Keep in touch and let me know when you're going to be in town.

Susan

Wilson Kriegel@EES
11/17/2000 02:26 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Coming to Houston, soon

you still in Houston or where are you and what are you up to>
I have not heard from you in quite a while.

So what have you been up to and how is Enron treating you. when are you going
to London.

All is well here...well work is very stressful, but it's cool and i do love
my job despite all the bitching i do.
It's just a lot of strss.
I've made some big move and actually won a big project over a VP.
You will be seing me soon in Houston. (can't tell you more)

Anyway
Partying like crazy..that's all I do..girls..girls...and more girls...i can't
even remember all their names OUPS>
Still in love with Shannon, and no she is still not in my life and yes she is
still in Houston...I hope life helps a little on this one.
Partying..like 4-5 times a week..
But above all, working out like an animal. It's been really good and i'm
starting to look like i did at Enron...a machine.
Running a lot and working out...

So what is up with you?

be in touch


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SKEAN>
To: connie_salvo-shook@duchesne.org, vballgurl4ever@hotmail.com, daphne_bragg@duchesne.org
Date: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:30:27 GMT
Subject:

 <<Trip to Italy.doc>> Thanx 4 being so patient!!! Here' my
story!!
			- Nora

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


whaddaya think?


Many thanks. Apologies for the error, I obtained Tana's e-mail details from
someone at Enron in London and they had misspelled it for me.

Thanks again for all your help.

Clare

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Taylor@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 6:00 PM
To: Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com
Cc: Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: Deutsche Bank ISDA Master Agreements

Clare,

Thanks for your note.  Your e-mail trouble is due to the spelling of Tana's
name - should only be one 'n.'  I am forwarding this on to her.

Mark

                    Clare.Godson@Alle

                    nOvery.com               To:     mark.taylor@enron.com

                                             cc:

                    10/09/2000 04:50         Subject:     FW: Deutsche Bank
ISDA Master Agreements
                    AM

Mark,

I am having some problems sending this to Tanna.  her e-mail keeps bouncing
back.  Could you pass this on to her please?

many thanks for your help.

Kind regards,

Clare

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Godson, Clare:ICM (LN)
> Sent:   Friday, October 06, 2000 3:16 PM
> To:     'tanna.jones@enron.com'
> Cc:     Markus.Fiala@enron.com; Nicholas.J.Stephan@enron.com;
> Rod.Nelson@enron.com; 'Elaine.Bannerman-Sowah@enron.com';
> edmund.cooper@enron.com; denis.o'connell@enron.com; paul.simons@enron.com
> Subject:     RE: Deutsche Bank ISDA Master Agreements
>
>
> Tanna,
>
> Could you please give me an update on where things stand on the
> finalisation of the Guarantees and Schedule with Deutsche.  I understood
> that the guarantees were with Enron Corp. for final approval and
> signature.  Is the documentation now agreed? As you are aware the
> negotiation of the documentation with EnronCredit.com is dependent upon
> the finalisation of the documentation outstanding with Houston.
>
> Many thanks for your help.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Clare
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Godson, Clare:ICM (LN)
> Sent:   Friday, September 22, 2000 3:06 PM
> To:     'tanna.jones@enron.com'
> Subject:     First Union National Bank (FUNB) ISDA Master Agreements
>
> Tanna,
>
> Thanks for your help on the Goldman Sachs and Deutsche negotiations.  If
> you could keep me posted on the timing of the Deutsche agreements being
> put in place that would be really helpful.  I also have another quick
> request and that relates to the ISDA Master Agreement with FUNB.  I have
> spoken to Delene Travella at FUNB.  They are negotiating an ECTRIC
> Schedule with you in Houston which they want to finalise before
commencing
> EnronCredit.com's negotiation.  Can you give me an update on where this
> negotiation stands and how long before it is likely to be finalised?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Clare Godson

======================================================================

This email is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20)
7330 3000 and requesting the Technology Services Helpdesk. You should not
copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other
person.

Allen & Overy
One New Change
London
EC4M 9QQ

Tel:+44 (20) 7330 3000
Fax: +44 (20) 7330 9999
General Email: Helpdesk@allenovery.com
www: http://www.allenovery.com

Allen & Overy is a solicitors' partnership.  A list of the names of
partners and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the
above office.  The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign
lawyers.

======================================================================


Folks -- The attached order requests more time and is troubling because Judge Wagner requests "quidance" from the Commission on whether to complete his investigation of apparent market affiliate rule violations.  Later Joe
----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 06/01/2001 07:55 AM -----

	"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com> 05/31/2001 04:45 PM 	   To: <jhartso@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: Fwd: Chief Judge's Report to the Commission, etc.

Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com	by mail.bracepatt.com; Thu, 31 May 2001 16:08:18 -0500
Received: FROM [208.207.43.2] BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Thu May 31 16:17:47 2001 -0500
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from no.name.available by [208.207.43.2]          via smtpd (for mail.bracepatt.com [205.138.132.1]) with SMTP; 31 May 2001 21:02:29 UT
Received: from internet.ferc.fed.us ([204.87.29.21]) by mailrelay1.ferc.gov with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);	 Thu, 31 May 2001 17:02:28 -0400
Received: from WDCODOMAIN-Message_Server by internet.ferc.fed.us	with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 31 May 2001 16:58:51 -0400
Message-Id: <sb16784b.057@internet.ferc.fed.us>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:58:38 -0400
From: "Curtis Wagner" <curtis.wagner@ferc.fed.us>
To: <dshaffer@akllp.com>,<kminesinger@akllp.com>,	<rrich@bracepatt.com>, <moloughl@brattle.com>,	<jhmcgrew@brudergentile.com>, <jmmarcoux@brudergentile.com>,	<hym@cpuc.ca.gov>, <jab@cpuc.ca.gov>,	<daniel.collins@elpaso.com>, <greg.jones@elpaso.com>,	<judy.heineman@elpaso.com>, <mark.cook@elpaso.com>,	<jlgreene@energyadvocates.com>,	"Edith Gilmore" <edith.gilmore@ferc.fed.us>,	"Marcia Hooks" <marcia.hooks@ferc.fed.us>,	"Martha Altamar" <martha.altamar@ferc.fed.us>,	"Ruby Meek" <ruby.meek@ferc.fed.us>, <jmoriarty@fw-law.com>,	<kbedwards@gkrse-law.com>, <jfagan@hewm.com>,	<PMohler@HEWM.com>, <DLBeresford@HHLAW.com>,	<GSterling@HHLAW.com>, <bjost@huberlaw.com>,	<dhuard@manatt.com>, <jgregg@mbolaw.com>,	<lochsenhirt@mbolaw.com>, <dmcwash@mshpc.com>, <frl3@pge.com>,	<sandrar@prestongates.com>, <GBaker@Sempra.com>,	<wlansinger@Sempra.com>, <DROBINSO@skadden.com>,	<GRICHMAN@skadden.com>, <JSherman@skadden.com>,	<wscherma@skadden.com>, <ryspeed-bost@verner.com>
Subject: Chief Judge's Report to the Commission, etc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_6E344E9B.CDACEA09"
Return-Path: curtis.wagner@ferc.fed.us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2001 21:02:28.0513 (UTC) FILETIME=[00361110:01C0EA15]

FYI
FYI
 - RP00-241-000 Report.wpd


I'll send 2 invites up.  What's your location?

Gregory Carraway@ENRON
07/10/2000 02:36 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Thank you for the invitation. I would love to attend. I would like to invite
my wife, if that would be ok. Also, could you tell me where the Mercantile
bar is located? Thank you!!!


Greetings:

1) I haven't forgot about Baldwin, but it seems that things have changed for him (and his company?).  His long-standing number know longer works and there's no forwarding number.  I'm trying to track him down.

2) What time's your weekly meeting on Thursday, and is there a call-in number?

Best,
Jeff


I believe our new Tennessee rep is Sherry Glazebrook at 832-676-2635.  If she's no longer there then call Andy Armstrong in the bid room and he will find out who our rep is.  His number is 832-676-5120.  Anyone that answers the phone in the bid room should be able to tell us how our rep is.

Our rep at Iroquois is Robin Zaleski at 203-925-7274.


Kay:

Attached are the revised Exhibits for the Bill of Sale and Notice of Exercise
of Purchase Option.  I have inserted the Purchase Amounts that tie to the
values in the Payoff Calculation approved by Ben.  I have footnoted the
[turbine] Purchase Amounts for Exhibit(s) 1 and Exhibit(s) 2a to reflect the
potential adjustments relative to the $1,829,000 MM which is due to be paid
[by TurboPark] on 1/15/01.  The [transformer] Purchase Amount in Exhibit(s)
2b reflect the fact that Intergen will be responsible for paying the final
$78,600 due to ABB.

Fred


ANR posted new notice(s) since our last check at 12/11/2000 2:30:01 PM, the
newest notice looks like:

 Operational flow order, 12/11/2000 14:47, 12/12/2000 09:00, 12/15/2000
09:00, 359, Pursuant to its tariff au

Please click the following to go to the web site for detail.

http://www.anrpl.com/GISB/swntccrt.asp


Jennifer is my asst, and will be out tomorrow, as will I.  I will have her
check first thing monday a.m. with mark's asst.

Jeff

	"Guarino, Carlo (C)" <cguarino@dow.com>
	02/22/2001 03:48 PM

		 To: "'Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com'" <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Buildscape Strategic Opportunity

Jeff, I tried to contact Jennifer Burn regarding Mark Fievert's availability
for April 27th and May 11th and I understand that she is out of the office .
I am meeting with Pedro Reinhard on monday around the planning for your trip
to midland and it would be good to know if Mark is joining you on the trip.
Thanks.

Best Regards,

Carlo
Carlo Guarino
Global Development Director
Dow Growth Center

Office  (517) 636-0860 / Mobile (313)655-7553
Fax      (517) 636-1453
Internet address: CGuarino@dow.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Guarino, Carlo (C)
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:34 PM
To: 'Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com'
Subject: RE: Buildscape Strategic Opportunity

Jeff, I think this is a good potential. We are going to setup for you to
meet with Arnold Allemang - VP of Operations to discuss this option.

Best Regards,

Carlo
Carlo Guarino
Global Development Director
Dow Growth Center

Office  (517) 636-0860 / Mobile (313)655-7553
Fax      (517) 636-1453
Internet address: CGuarino@dow.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:26 PM
To: cguarino@dow.com
Subject: RE: Buildscape Strategic Opportunity

Something else you may consider as a topic for our April/May meeting:  have
you guys looked at outsourcing your entire energy needs (gas and power in
particular).  We have been very successful in helping customers save quite
a bit of money on their energy expense, and as you see in today's power and
gas markets, that can be extremely valuable...

Best,

Jeff

                    "Guarino,

                    Carlo (C)"           To:
"'Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com'"
                    <cguarino@dow        <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>

                    .com>                cc:

                                         Subject:     RE: Buildscape
Strategic Opportunity
                    02/21/2001

                    03:13 PM

Jeff, thanks for your help on the introduction and follow up. I'll let you
know how we go and if we do come to Houston shortly I'll let you know when.
Talk to you soon.

Best Regards,

Carlo
Carlo Guarino
Global Development Director
Dow Growth Center

Office  (517) 636-0860 / Mobile (313)655-7553
Fax      (517) 636-1453
Internet address: CGuarino@dow.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 3:09 PM
To: cguarino@dow.com
Subject: Re: Buildscape Strategic Opportunity

I have forwarded your info to both Philippe Bibi, CEO of Enron
Networks--the group responsible for our Enron Online site, and to Ray
Bowen, COO of Enron Industrial Markets--the group responsible for
paper/pulp.

Best Regards,

Jeff


Will you be providing additional information to support these numbers before the meeting on your per person costs and how we are charged overhead etc.

Also why only the numbers in the blue.  We have not agreed to the rest?  I have also seen numbers that are quite different and several of these projects are not required as well as some are overpriced.

Also how will the allocation between east, west and canada be done for these single line items.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cavazos, Virginia
Sent: Mon 10/15/2001 2:27 PM
To: Belden, Tim; Will, Lloyd; Storey, Geoff; Luce, Laura; Milnthorp, Rob; Greenberg, Mark; Weatherspoon, Patricia; Scribner, James; Hedstrom, Peggy; McKeel, Richard
Cc: Wong, Joe
Subject: FW: ENA IT 2002 Budgets

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Wong, Joe
Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 2:24 PM
To:     Cavazos, Virginia
Subject:        ENA IT 2002 Budgets

This document contains information for our IT Budget review meeting scheduled for this Wed. at 1:00.  Most people will be calling in via a conf. call (see meeting notice for details); otherwise it is in ECN 1835.

Objectives - review part of the 2002 IT costs & allocations for ENA, answer any questions, and obtain your approval to proceed with these projects.

The attached spreadsheet contains all the IT projects being allocated to ENA.  We will only review the projects in blue.  The list contains the name of the project (column C), Project Description (column D), Allocation Basis (column N), EA Allocation % (column O), and Costs being allocated to EA (column P).

Thanks.  Joe.
<<ENA Project Review.xls>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 07:28
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Narsimha Misra @ ENRON                           02/11/2001 11:21 AM

To: Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom
May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron, Gautam
Gupta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Hrabal/HOU/ECT@ect,
Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Miller/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Alternate Location for NYISO Schedules

In case of problems accessing the NYISO website for submitting schedules and
such, try this alternative site for access... I have found this to be
available when the main site is down... I would try the main site first
though...
https://mtdev.nyiso.com
-narsimha


FYI. In bizarre times, help can sometimes come from bizarre places.  Granted,
we're likely to disagree strongly with Hogan's continued obsession with
Poolco, but the discussion in his paper regarding market power may be
helpful---I've read the Joskow paper, but haven't yet had a chance to review
the Hogan piece.

Steve and I discussed the need to do a focused assessment of the Joskow/Kahn
"analysis"  (remember it's Ed Kahn, not Alfred Kahn).  Seems that it would be
very useful to fold into that analysis any useful stuff on market power
included in the paper done by Hogan & Co.  If, in the end, there ain't
nothing useful, so be it.  But seems like there's little downside to
exploring it.

Jim, my understanding is that Alan is already working with the fundamentals
folks on the Portland desk to deconstruct the Joskow paper.  Might want to
include the Hogan paper in those discussions and might also be useful to pull
Seabron Adamson into the thinking, too.  Ultimately, may be preferable to
have any assessment of Joskow and/or Hogan to come from economists, rather
than directly from us.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 11:38 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	11/30/2000 11:29 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <BillR@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <glwaas@calpx.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>,
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <KEWH@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
<foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
<Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com>, <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
<Roger.Pelote@Williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: From Today's Electricity Daily

Has FERC Gone Far Enough in California?
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission isn't going far enough in its
attempt to reform the California wholesale electric market, according to a
paper by three prominent economists done for San Diego Gas and Electric. The
paper by John D. Chandley, Scott M. Harvey, and William W. Hogan argues that
FERC should first end the artificial separation that divides the California
Power Exchange and the California Independent System Operator, rather than
worrying about the governance of the two institutions.
"The change in governance may help," says the paper - "Electricity Market
Reform in California" - "but it is not likely to be decisive in the near
term. Explicit guidance from the commission regarding the nature and
trajectory of reforms will be essential if market reform is to be
accomplished within an acceptable time frame." Hogan, of the Kennedy School
of Government, has been writing since 1995 in opposition to California's
market separation.
Also, argues the paper, freeing the California utilities to engage in forward
contracting is no panacea. "The expectation that merely allowing utilities to
participate in forward contracting necessarily would be the solution to high
prices is problematic and not supported by the commission's staff report,"
says the analysis, adding that "putting pressure on buyers to sign contracts
in the present environment may make things worse." If the underlying problem
in California is high cost and low capacity, requiring forward contracting
could harm not only California but also the entire Western U.S. electric
system.
FERC's $150 so-called "soft cap" is a wild card that has the three economists
scratching their heads. "It does not appear in the staff report and there is
little critical analysis of their implications, other than the discussion of
Commissioner [Curt] Hebert." If the intent of the soft cap is to move toward
cost justification for bids above $150/MWh, then FERC is headed into an
administrative morass "that would rival those under wellhead price controls
in the natural gas industry."
If, on the other hand, the soft cap is "truly soft" and would only require
some paper work at FERC and the possibility of a refund if the price is
eventually deemed not just and reasonable, "there might be little impact on
consumer prices (particularly if the principal sources of those high prices
are high costs and regional capacity shortages rather than the exercise of
market power). Even so, the proposal might serve to deter entry and new
investments, thus combining the worst of both worlds, high consumer prices
and little or no new investment."
FERC's proposed order in California also demonstrates confusion about just
what constitutes market power. The paper cites the proposed order's lawyerly,
obfuscatory conclusion that "while this record does not support findings of
specific exercises of market power, and while we are not able to reach
definite conclusions about the actions of individual sellers, there is clear
evidence that in California market structure and rules provide the
opportunity for sellers to exercise market power when supply is tight and can
result in unjust and unreasonable rates under the [Federal Power Act]." The
economists note, "In this regard, the debate is confused because we are
dancing around the words where the truth may be hard to face."
In the case of California, say the economists, there is no evidence of market
power. Even the practice of generators avoiding the day-ahead market in favor
of the real-time market "is a response to bad market design and pricing
incentives (including price caps), but does not demonstrate the exercise of
market power." Nor is bidding above marginal cost necessarily an exercise of
market power, they add. "The distinction between direct marginal cost and
opportunity cost is sometimes lost in the discussion. Hence, a competitive
bidder whose direct cost of generation is $40 but who could sell the same
energy outside California for $100 should bid no less than $100. This would
not be an exercise of market power."


yes, but again limited to 12 bottles (at a time)? If you space them out they
never know!

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:?? Monday, November 06, 2000 3:28 PM
To:???? Nancy Sellers
Subject:??????? Re: FW: Gotta see this one! Food that moves!

and do you get the discount for the 97 Reserve?


-----Original Message-----
From: scott neal [mailto:scott.neal@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:56 PM
To: rstrenger@businessedge.com
Subject: RE: eBay Request total for Item#1301501330 (4 Big 12
Championship Tickets (Lower Level))

I just set up a Pay Pal account and sent payment to rstrenger@yahoo.com.
I'll be looking for the tickets in the mail.

thanks,

Scott Neal

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Strenger [mailto:rstrenger@businessedge.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:30 PM
To: 'scott neal'
Subject: RE: eBay Request total for Item#1301501330 (4 Big 12
Championship Tickets (Lower Level))

Paypal if possible.  Use rstrenger@yahoo.com.

-----Original Message-----
From: scott neal [mailto:scott.neal@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:24 PM
To: rstrenger@businessedge.com
Subject: RE: eBay Request total for Item#1301501330 (4 Big 12
Championship Tickets (Lower Level))

What is your preference for payment?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Strenger [mailto:rstrenger@businessedge.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:25 PM
To: aw-confirm@ebay.com
Cc: scott.neal@worldnet.att.net
Subject: RE: eBay Request total for Item#1301501330 (4 Big 12
Championship Tickets (Lower Level))

The total price is $535.00.  This includes the four tickets described and
one blue parking pass.  I will pay for shipping.  Please let me know how you
would like to pay.

Ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: aw-confirm@ebay.com [mailto:aw-confirm@ebay.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:22 PM
To: rstrenger@businessedge.com
Cc: scott.neal@worldnet.att.net
Subject: eBay Request total for Item#1301501330 (4 Big 12 Championship
Tickets (Lower Level))

Dear rlstrenger,

The buyer, sneal120,  would like to know the total amount for the item
below. To help you calculate the total, the shipping address is included
below.

To create and send an invoice to the buyer, click here:
http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/ebayISAPI.dll?UnifiedCheckoutSellerUpdateDetails
&itemId=1301501330&transId=0
Alternatively, you may contact the buyer directly.

Details:
----------

    Item Title:         4 Big 12 Championship Tickets (Lower Level)
    Item #:             1301501330
    Item Price:         535.00
    Quantity:           1
    Buyer:              sneal120
    Buyer email:        scott.neal@worldnet.att.net
    Date of Request:    Monday, Nov 26, 2001 20:21:56 PST

    Buyer Shipping Address:
	Scott M Neal
	13603 Pebblebrook
	Houston, TX 77079
	United States

If you have any questions, you can contact the buyer at
scott.neal@worldnet.att.net.

Remember: eBay will not ask you for sensitive personal information (such as
your password, credit card and bank account numbers, Social Security
numbers, etc.) in an email.

Copyright 1995-2001 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated
trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.


Please plan to attend a meeting to finalize the ECS/EES  Master Agreement
tomorrow 11/30/00 at 1:30 pm CST.

I will email everyone tomorrow with location.

Dave-I will also email you the call in number tomorrow.

Thanks
Xochitl


The Museum of Fine Arts Houston


John-
Probably don't have time to respond to the message, but hope you are
weathering this storm ok.  Call me if you have some time or need to blow off
some steam.

-Bill

PS-If you are going to be back east in the spring, let me know so we can tee
it up at Somerset Hills, something tells me you may need a break.

955 Esmeralda Avenue, #3
San Francisco, CA 94110
415-282-6298
billmcilwain@yahoo.com

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


I sent Stacy & Scott tickets from you.


He asked me for the comments.

	From:  David Marshall @ ECT                           12/11/2000 08:51 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Fuel Cell

Kay,
unfortunately I deleted the comments.  You may want to check with Scott Healy
as I seem to recall that he may have been on the origination side.


In addition to World Markets Energy information  <http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket.asp>
 and Country Analysis and Forecasting, <http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket_CountryAnalysis.asp>

eSource now offers free access to World Markets - Regulatory Analysis

World Markets Regulatory Analysis offers:

		Daily Reports - Legal, regulatory and policy developments in 185 countries. Comprehensive monitoring of legislative, regulatory and policy
 			changes for each country
		Email Alerts -  Automatic daily email alerts of current and impending legal, regulatory and policy changes affecting the development of markets
		Daily Analysis - Same-day in-depth assessment of the impact of legal developments by in-house analysts. Features detailed analysis of key legal
			changes written exclusively for Regulatory Analysis by a unique network of legal experts in more than 180 countries
		Country Reports - Assessments of the legal systems in 185 countries, including rules on establishing a business and restrictions on foreign investors

		Access World Markets Regulatory Analysis:  http://esource.enron.com/worldmarket_regulatory.asp

										***

		For additional new products and reports, visit eSource's Hot Topics page at http://esource.enron.com/hot_topics.asp


C. Engel
Cleveland, OH
cengel@apk.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate (atleast some of) the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

C. Engel


Gee, if you hurry you can still make it to the volleyball game.


missing deal for mike d

buy psco
may
midc
320.00
25 mw
on peak


Time -   2pm - 6pm
Where -  1400 Smith St
  Floor - 50
  Room - 50M (Executive Dining Room)

Please bring identification. Security will have your names.

Format:
2 hrs presentations -  Troy Blakeney, Overview of HFD (15 min)
   Dr. Persse, Overview of EMS and its Issues (45 min)
   Lisa Connolly, Overview of TriData Study & HFD/Community Discussions (1.5
- 2 hrs)

11/2 - 2 hrs -  HFD Discussions

See you Sunday!

Thanks,
Lisa


Check this out - just someone else's point of view
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	t.compton@pecorp.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-t+2Ecompton+40pecorp+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 7:48 AM
To:	Simpson, James
Subject:	FW: Morning Briefing

> ----------
> From: 	Bennett, Kathy M.[SMTP:Kathy.M.Bennett@usa.conoco.com]
> Sent: 	Friday, June 08, 2001 7:37 AM
> To: 	A.Rimel - AEDC; B. White @ AGIP; D. Sills @Newfield; T. Gonzales @
> Newfield; W.Hussey - Phillips; Mike Hastings@ppco.com; J. Weyland -
> Dominion; R.Hairr@Meridian; G. Chapel - MichCon; B. Chitwood @ppco; D.
> Mauldin @ Devon; T. Compton @ Peoples; P.Burgener; D.Howard - Consumers;
> R. Fors - Consumers; D. Van Der Meersch@union gas; R. Williams@Cabot
> Subject: 	FW: Morning Briefing
>
>  <<Morning Briefing-Working-060801.pdf>>  <<image001.gif>>
> <<image002.gif>>
>
>
> ----------
> From:   Duncan, James W.
> Sent:   Friday, June 08, 2001 7:37:44 AM
> Subject:        Morning Briefing
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
>
>
>
>
> Jim Duncan
>
> (281) 293-1649
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Morning Briefing-Working-060801.pdf
 - image001.gif
 - image002.gif


great man...we just lifted a new pad too this past weekend...Bunker Hill
area...sweet

fletch


Check this one: http://www.madblast.com/oska/humor_bin.swf


I think you are right on there...I'm just telling you that if you had seen that 10 point I shot "on the hoof", not dead on the ground w/ a cut out lower jaw for inspection, you would have said "Damn, that's an old deer."
Compared to his Identical Offspring. Same body size, Same EXACT antler formation (9" g-2's, with a 2 inch kicker coming out sideways from his left G-2, and crab claw) The only difference b/w these 2 deer was the young one had about 2 inches more spread, and about 15 inches more total antlers) Mass was more on my deer, indicating age. The BIG difference was standing side by side, the younger one looked like a "thoroughbread Horse", while mine looked like a mule...if you can understand that. That being said, if we think that we are underestimating age on the hoof and putting all the criteria together about what "formula" makes a old deer look old, I would have to say that My 10 point was "Mature and on his way down" while the young one (Same deer that Keith has seen, too) is "Mature and on his way up". The last thing I have to say about that was that the "Young" deer of the two was definitely the "dominant" of the two as well. He was aggressive towards my "ol' bastard" and the old guy didn't want any part of him...The young one was passed on harvesting by both Keith and myself and I chose to harvest the older one of the two. Put in the same arena with a bunch of does and his younger sibling, that younger sibling was gonna get the chance to "pour the Chili" while the old guy snuck in from the brush, got bullied away by the "stud", ate enough to survive, and silently sneaked away. Meanwhile the younger stud, ate and chased does around to his hearts content, no worries about anything. Which deer needed to get shot in that scenario?
My final answer...my deer..7.5 yrs or older. His son, 4.5 and about to be a Texas Big Game Award winner next season if he lives through the summer and doesn't "disappear" like a lot of the other bucks we never see again from year to year.

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:08 PM
To: knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Brian Constantine
Subject: age of joe's deer

Went to BFE with Joe during lunch to pick up his european mount of his 9pt.
He aged Joes deer at 8.5. We may be underaging alot of these deer on the
hoof.
The guy does nice work and the prices were reasonable.

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


Mr. Haedicke,

Bob Williams asked me to forward last month's litigation reports to you.
Thank you.

Jan


Per my voice mail.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/05/2000
06:59 PM ---------------------------

Sami Arap@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/05/2000 09:18 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Sara;

Are you also involved in EnronOnLine ?  I only got a copy of an EOL summary
but would like to receive a more detailed memo about such business.  Can you
provide me with any additional materials ?!

Thanks,

Sami

Sara Shackleton@ECT
05/04/2000 04:29 PM
To: Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Andrea Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Hi, Sami!  Sorry we missed the call yesterday.  I just wanted to update you
on some of the financial trading issues in Brazil (and I have added you to
the working group list).  I am going to finalize our "swap matrix" for
Brazil.  On the physical trading side, I had asked a physical trading lawyer
to call you and am wondering if Elizabeth Sager ever called or emailed.
Please let me know.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 05/04/2000 01:21:59 PM
To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc: Andrea.Bertone@enron.com, Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com,
Rick.Hopkinson@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br, Krishna@tozzini.com.br
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your message below. Please find attached hereto free
translation into English of new foreign investor's regulations in Brazil. We
are preparing a memo to you in connection with such new regulations and are
finalizing the matrix prepared last year. We will send them to you shortly.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 05/04 12:08 pm >>>

AFAC and Marcelo:  I hope this message finds you both well.  I would like to
finalize the matrix which was prepared last year so that we can create a
"baseline" for future updates.  Please feel free to date the matrix as of
December, 1999, if you wish.  Please forward any recent changes to me for
comment  and I will respond immediately.  Then we can move on to other things!
Thanks for your help and attention to this mattter.  Regards.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
10:34
AM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 03/13/2000 06:27:26 PM

To:   Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc:   Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br
Subject:  Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your E-mail below. We will be reflecting the new changes in the
regulations in the chart and will be sending it to your review as soon as
possible.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 03/13 2:29 pm >>>

Greetings to you both!  It has been awhile since we last spoke.  I would like
to
finalize the matrix which we have been discussing since the latter part of
1999.
Although we were awaiting new Central Bank regulations, I am beginning to
think
that the Central Bank revisions will not impact the matrix except with respect
to transactions which may be entered into by entities that are the subject of
the Central Bank regulations.  Please let me know whether or not you agree or
can offer any suggestions.  Thanks and regards.  Sara

 - Res2689a.doc
 - Ins325a.doc


February 23, 2001

     Teco Tap  30.000

February 24, 2001

     Teco Tap  17.500

February 25, 2001

     Teco Tap  38.750


Ken, Tom,

Can you, please, forward the evaluation forms to our guests?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
05:41 PM ---------------------------
From: Jennifer Brockwell/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/01/2001 12:33 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Experience Enron Feedback

I would like any feedback you have concerning your guests that toured Enron
this past week.  I have attached two feedback forms, one for Professor
Lasden's visit and and another for the Rice Students, or you may just jot
down whatever feedback you have for us.

Thank you.

Jennifer


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitchell Taylor/Corp/Enron on
03/21/2000 05:49 PM ---------------------------

Francisco Pinto Leite@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/21/2000 05:38 PM

To:   Amit Walia@ECT
cc:   Mitchell Taylor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, fsayre@ei.enron.com, Randy
      Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:  Confidential

Apparently our local counsel in Puerto Rico had a small "change of heart"
as to the transfer restrictions for San Juan Gas, Procaribe and Progasco.
Although the statute does not contain a change of control provision with
respect to the licenses, it appears that after carefully looking into this
issue, local counsel found out that the Puerto Rican authorities are taking
a very aggressive approach with respect to transfers of control of holders
of licenses.  Apparently the Puerto Rican authorities argue that the spirit
of the statute is to extend the requirement of prior authorization for
transfers of the licenses, to a change of control of the operator.  In his
response to Bill Weiland from V&E he advised that it would be more prudent
to request permission to change control of the company that holds the
license.

FPL


can we chat about this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Diomedes Christodoulou" <diomedes@cumulouscapital.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:40 PM
To:	Walls Jr., Rob
Cc:	jim.derrick@enron.com
Subject:	RE: Enron payments

Rob,

Thanks. I am copying Jim on the entire exchange.

I realize things are hectic at Enron but they have been for some time
now and my payments can no longer be delayed. I think no one wants to
assume responsibility for this and that's why I am writing to you and
Jim because the delay is really reaching break point from my standpoint.
These are contractually agreed upon payments and they are not days or
weeks late but MANY MONTHS late. I really need to receive the payments
in a matter of days.

All the best and look forward to hearing from you.

Diomedes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob.Walls@enron.com [mailto:Rob.Walls@enron.com]
Sent: 25 October 2001 17:05
To: diomedes@cumulouscapital.com
Subject: RE: Enron payments

Dio -

I think Jim's email address is jim.derrick@enron.com.  I haven't heard
back
from Mary Joyce on any of this.  In fairness to her, things are a little
hectic over here right now.  Thanks.

Rob

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Diomedes Christodoulou" <diomedes@cumulouscapital.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:00 PM
   To:     Walls Jr., Rob
   Subject:  FW: Enron payments

   Rob,

   I've not been able to follow this to Jim ?I must be misspelling his
   name. Can you please do so and also send me his email address?

   Thanks,

   Diomedes.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Diomedes Christodoulou [mailto:diomedes@cumulouscapital.com]
   Sent: 24 October 200118:21
   To: 'jim.dereck@enron.com'; 'rob.walls@enron.com'
   Subject: FW: Enron payments

   Jim and Rob,

   I hope you are both doing well. I realize that you must both be
   extremely busy with other more important issues but I find myself in
a
   position that I HAVE to raise the issue described in the email below
to
   your direct attention. The email is self explanatory but the bottom
line
   is that not only has Enron failed to make payments that are due to me
   and to one of my companies for MONTHS now but  the company is not
even
   responding to my requests for information.

   I would highly appreciate it if you advised me on the best way to
handle
   this, i.e WHO do I need to talk to who has the decision authority to
   make the payments and give me answers. I stress once more that the
   unjustified delays by Enron in making these payments is already
causing
   me serious  problems and potential losses.

   I look forward to your response.

   Thanks and hope to see you soon.

   Diomedes.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Diomedes Christodoulou [mailto:diomedes@cumulouscapital.com]
   Sent: 20 October 200118:03
   To: 'mary.joyce@enron.com'
   Cc: 'John.Novak@enron.com'
   Subject: Enron payments

   Mary Joyce,

   I hope all is well with you.

   I am contacting you regarding a number of late payments by Enron
which
   have now become urgent from my standpoint. These payments refer to
   contractual obligations between ECI (one of my affiliate companies)
and
   Enron and to the Employment Contract between Enron and myself. The
   payments have been invoiced and they are months late now.

   After questioning John Novak about the status of these payments
(after
   leaving Enron I was told by Rob Walls to send all invoices related to
   the ECI and to my agreement with Enron to John Novak in Enron South
   America) I received a voice mail from Pam Buttler, who I believe
works
   with you, informing me that I would have to wait until early
November,
   maybe even until late November as the "changes in management at Enron
   require that all contracts be reviewed by the Compensation Committee
   which would convene in early or late November".

   As soon as I received this message last Wednesday I left a message
with
   Pam and also a voice mail with you and I subsequently left two
messages
   with your assistant asking you to contact me urgently regarding this
   very serious matter but as I have not heard from you I am writing
this
   email to make sure that my position is clear.

   These payments are due by Enron based on existing contracts and I see
no
   reason why I have to wait for a review by an internal Compensation
   Committee. These payments are already significantly late and I have
been
   extremely patient with continuous delays in payments due to me by
Enron
   up to now. Moreover I have repeatedly let Enron know that I am in the
   process of closing a transaction which depends on receiving these
   payments, otherwise I would incur costs by unwinding other positions
   that I have. I need these payments to be made no later than
Wednesday,
   October 24.

   Please inform me of Enron's intents so that I can take all the
   appropriate steps to enforce my contractual rights.

   I look forward to hearing from you,

   Regards,

   Diomedes Christodoulou.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Shanna and I would love to come.

-e

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 03/27/2001 02:17:03 PM
To: Jason Bass <jbass1@houston.rr.com>, eric preston bass
<Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Hi Guys. You guys and guest care to join us for  Easter Brunch @ SWCC? I need
to make reservations? ASAP so let me  know.-Dad


Pursuant to our conference call earlier today, I have attached draft TRO
pleadings for the Jenks, Oklahoma project which can be included in your
files.  These pleadings are simply a guide to what will be prepared for
Arizona and Mississippi.  I will prepare a list of all current local counsel
for the relevant projects and also include proposed local counsel for the
Arizona and Mississippi projects.  At the moment, I am incorporating Mark's
revisions to the statement of position and I will send them as soon as they
have been included.  Please let me know if you need any further information.

 - bond word.doc
 - complaint word.doc
 - memolaw word.doc
 - Motion for Pro Hac Vice.doc
 - Motion For TRO word.doc
 - notmtntro word.doc
 - Pro Hac Vice Order word.doc
 - telegram word.doc
 - TRO word.doc
 - verific word.doc
 - Verification of Attempt To Notify word.doc


This sounds fine.

Please have my phone forwarded to Ava and provide her with my contact information.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winters, Ricki
Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 8:46 AM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Subject:	Vacation Plans
Importance:	High

Shelley, I need to make my vacation plans for the Christmas holidays and I don't know how long you will be away.

Since I did not take any vacation during Thanksgiving, I was planning on leaving Thursday December 20th, returning on Monday January 7th.  Jean will be checking my lap top to make sure my dial-in access is stable so I will be able to keep your in basket clean.  During these dates, I could also have your phone forwarded to Ava if you wish.  We can work out the details later, but I need to purchase my ticket today.

Since there are many things going on during these uncertain times and you need me here, please feel free to say so,,,, I understand completely.

Thank you, Ricki


The latest edition of MARKETWIRE is available online now!!

Here's just some of the features this week!

In our newest feature?.7 Questions, an interview segment where we ask a prominent industry executive 7 questions. In this issue we feature Peter Beutel, a veteran of the marketplace, President of Cameron Hanover in New Canaan, CT and a frequent guest on CNN.

Our Lead Feature this week: MERCHANT REFINERS BATTLE GIANTS FOR SLICE OF PROFITS?

The Publisher discusses the economy and those "indicators."

"Will Relaxed Regulations Ease the Transition from Winter to Summer Grade Gasoline?".....where we examine some proposed deadline changes and what effect, if any, they may have.

"The Winter Heating Season....A BUST!" ...a leading meterologist explains what happened.

A Look at Long-term EIA Forecasts for Gasoline Demand Growth.....are they being conservative?

Of course we have our weekly crude oil and products market reports and price diaries, a complete supply section, our very popular refining segment, plus much more to round out the most comprehensive market intelligence tool in the petroleum industry. And best of all?..it's FREE?.along with our WEEKLY PADD Reports (PADDs 1-5 plus Canadian terminals). Our competition asks anywhere from $975 to $2,800 per year weekly publications! Find out why we are the fastest growing publication in the industry today!

So, if you've previously signed up, download the latest issue. If not, you should.

Just go to www.dtnenergy.com/marketwire

Log in or sign up!?..it's that easy!

And it's FREE!


I don't believe Ben agreed to absolutely free transferablity on their part.
To ponder.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/20/2000 04:07
PM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/20/2000 04:00:27 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com, CCampbell@KSLAW.com,
JKeffer@KSLAW.com
cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com

Subject: Certain revisions to LLC Agreement

Attached is a copy of the last draft of the LLC Agreement prepared by
ENA which I have revised to incorporate the changes discussed in your
recent telephone conversation with Doug Pedigo.  In the interest of
time, I have not revised the attached LLC Agreement to reflect the
substitution of Sweetgum for Tejas.

Section 6.1(c)(iii) was revised to reflect Sweetgum's right to freely
assign its LLC interest.  Section 6.2(a) was revised to reflect
Sweetgum's right to exercise the call at any time if it either obtains
or waives the GE consent.  Section 6.2(c) was revised to allow ENA to
exercise its put at any time (i) if it obtains GE's consent in form and
substance satisfactory to Sweetgum in its sole discretion or (ii) after
all GE warranties have expired.

To expedite matters, I am forwarding these changes to you at the same
time I am forwarding them to Doug.


Margaret,

I shall invite Hunter Shiveley. I think it will cover ENA.

Vince

Margaret Carson@ENRON
11/02/2000 09:57 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Dale Nesbitt meeting TUES

Vince  Do you  plan on  inviting  anyone  from the power  issues side
--perhaps Ben Jacoby, Julie Gomez, Jean Mrha, Scott Neal  to  this meeting?
Thanks  Margaret
---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron on 11/02/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------

	From:  John Goodpasture                           11/01/2000 05:53 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Dale Nesbitt meeting

Margaret Carson is going to join us in the meeting next week with Nesbitt.
Vince will check with ENA to see if they also want to attend.  I would also
like to determine if ETS and/or NBP would want to send a representative(s),
although Margaret said she would take copious notes for distribution to other
key players as necessary.  We should ask Nesbitt how he would structure a
deal for multiple clients (eg. ETS, NBP, ENA, and maybe El Paso).

[We need to remain aware of any "affiliate" issues that may result, and make
certain that we are in complete compliance with the regs.]

I will wait until after our meeting with Nesbitt before deciding if/how to
approach El Paso.  Presumably, if asked to particpate, they would share the
cost and have independent access to any working model that is developed.

JNG

---------------------- Forwarded by John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron on 11/01/2000
04:51 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
10/30/2000 04:42 PM
To: John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dale Nesbitt

John,

I talked to Dale Nesbitt. He suggested that the best way to evaluate his
model is to
go through a one week intensive project with assistance of somebody from his
company.
Our cost  is a flat fee of $12,500 that would be deducted from the purchase
price of $55,000,
in case we buy the software package.

The price of 55K is indicative and will be adjusted based on the required
level of support.

Dale will be in Houston next week. I have tentatively invited him to visit
with us on Tuesday,
November 7, at 3:00 p.m. He will adjust if you are busy at this time.

Please, let me know what you think.

Vince


Oh, yeah, that's right.....

Heather Kroll@ECT
02/13/2001 02:11 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Non circumvent

I'm waiting. . .


Gerald,

This is the letter that went out.  Minor change to the last paragraph to
make it more accurate.  This will go out today.

Ken Krisa

 - Dakota Wildhorse ltr 9-14-00.doc


Hi Laine,
 I am going to set up a conference call for you, Christaan, John Novak, our
outside counsel John Gardiner and me to discuss the force majeure
investigation and the process to follow to assure that any record created
supports our litigation strategy and position, and that we keep
communications about the investigation privileged.  Are you and Christaan
available Monday or Tuesday?  A half hour should be plenty.
Hope you are both doing well.
Kind regards,
Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/09/2001 04:59 PM ---------------------------

Michelle Blaine
02/08/2001 06:38 PM
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine.A.Powell@enron.com, John
Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rafael Rangel/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob
G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Federico Cerisoli/SA/Enron@Enron, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Gabriela Aguilar/SA/Enron@Enron, Mariella
Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron,
Gabriela Aguilar/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B
Sanders@ECT

Subject: Furnas Litigation Arbitration/Strictly Privileged and
Confidential/Attorney Work Product/Attorney Client Communication

This is a very BASIC outline of the litigation/arbitration strategy with no
detail and the budget numbers are ballpark, subject to revision as we
determine which strategy to take.  If anyone needs something more detailed I
am happy to create that.  Keep in mind this is privileged material that
should not be shared outside the control group unless it is outside counsel.
If privileged material gets outside the group, the privilege is waived.  From
now on, please tag all emails, reports, memos, agendas or written
communications of any kind discussing any of the issues regarding the
consent, termination, force majeure, damages or anything relevant to the
issues that may be litigated or arbitrated with the notation
"CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION" and copy John Novak
or me on it so we can attempt to keep it privileged.

Laine, this is especially true with respect to the force majeure
investigation.  All communications/reports of any kind about this
investigation are to be done at the direction of counsel, in anticipation of
litigation to keep them privileged. This prevents us from having to produce
any results of the investigation to Furnas in the event of arbitration unless
we want to.  Therefore, please copy John Novak & me on all communications
regarding the investigation and direct any reports about the investigation to
me with the notation, "Prepared at the direction of counsel in anticipation
of litigation. DO NOT PRODUCE IN DISCOVERY."  If we need to hire any outside
consultants for this, I need to prepare a tasking letter for them so that any
reports or records they produce will be privileged, because it is being done
at the direction of counsel in anticipation of litigation.  If we fail to do
this, anything they say or write is fair game for the other side.  I'll give
you a call about this.

Everyone, think before you write things down and be especially careful with
email.  Remember you may have to produce notes, emails etc at some point.
Please call me if you have any questions or if I can assist any of you.
713-345-6159.
Kindest regards,
Michelle Blaine


Sorry Mike wrong address
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
11/28/2000 12:22 PM
To: Michael L Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2000 Cost Summary thru 11/17

Guys, lets get together to get final resolution to these issues including the
peaker fee asap.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
12:20 PM ---------------------------

Theresa Vos@ENRON
11/28/2000 12:00 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clement Lau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felicia
Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Zarsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Curry/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Warren
Schick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy R
Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2000 Cost Summary thru 11/17

Attached is the Cost Summary for the 2000 Peakers with actuals thru
11/17/00.  I still have not received any cost reports from Nepco.  Please
call me if you have any questions.

thanks,
theresa
x58173


No changes for me - Sithe.
PL


I added cames to your gas daily net send.

Thanks,  Errol


Is this who you were going to consult for? Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnes, Sylvia
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:24 AM
To:	Hagelmann, Bjorn
Cc:	Buy, Rick; Engberg, Alan; Friedman, Douglas S.; Rice, Rob
Subject:	Borden Chemical, Inc.

Bjorn:

Many thanks for your role in yesterday's meeting with Borden Chemical.  It was most appropriate for you to follow-up with Ed and Bob, and skillfully stick-handle the opportunity in the adept manner you did.  As we discussed, it's hard to guess what direction the company will choose to take going forward, but I believe we gave it a good shot.  I spoke with Alan, and he will call Ed and/or Bob later in the week to see what their thoughts are, given time for reflection.  If we do not hear back from Bob by mid-next week, I will call him.

Thank you again,
skb


Michael says that you and he will be putting up Christmas decorations this
evening "straight away"  "before nightfall"  etc.  Of course, it is a good
thing to do at night so long as it isn't raining.

I was thinking it would be fun to have a family outing this weekend instead
of sitting around the house.  Maybe Moody Gardens?  That seems like a fun
place to go.

What do you think?

ckm

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 11/29/2000 08:27:00 AM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: first step

Good Morning from my new office.

Stand by... more info to follow later.

Love, NM


ISO Market Participants:

On March 8, we notified you that the ISO had received a direct payment of
about $171 million from PG&E ($177 million less GMC obligation) with
direction from PG&E that these funds were in payment for transactions on the
ISO Controlled Grid in December 2000, scheduled by the California Power
Exchange (PX) as PG&E's Scheduling Coordinator, and invoiced to PG&E by the
PX for remittance to the ISO. We notified you further that the ISO had
placed these funds into a segregated interest-bearing account pending
resolution of their distribution.

The PX has provided notice that it has filed suit in the Central District of
California against the California ISO and moved for a temporary restraining
order (TRO), requiring the ISO to transfer these funds to the CalPX. Copies
of the complaint and the TRO application are attached below. As represented
by the PX in its complaint and moving papers, the ISO does not intend to
oppose the PX's TRO application. To the best of the ISO's knowledge, a
hearing on the TRO application has not yet been set.

Byron B. Woertz, Jr.

Director, Client Relations

(916) 608-7066

 - calpx3.doc
 - calpx4.doc
 - calpx5.doc


Good Morning,

My target testing date today is June 18th,  I am running in Test P in Local Enpower using actual data from our scheduling sheets re-arranged to meet the new guidelines.

The daily deals I coded X in columns J and N,  the Month long bookouts and BOM bookouts I coded R.

What worked:

I was able to retrieve my saved workspace with all data intact. I had previously sucessfully copied and pasted my entire sheet from EXCEL to the PSW.

I was able to run the build route report with the criteria of "Starting On- June 18-PaloVerde-Day of week Mask Activated-Report Changes activated." A check of deals actually scheduled vs. build route results showed that all deals were extracted correctly from Enpower. Because I am working on closed dates, a cumulative test of this app will not be fully testable until production. We are expecting to see the same functionality as the current incarnation of Build route. The data extracted should be read only, time stamped, and when run mulitple times additional data should be shown below previously extracted data.  The improvement we are expecting to see is the app should not duplicate deal strips on dates that have no physical power flow. (West Light Load currently does this in Start view, but not Active view)

Navigating around the scheduling sheet itself I was able to accurately execute the sort function on a single criteria at a time. Multiple sorting will contunue to be done in excel, or we can do a series of single sorts in the PSW to acheive the same result.

Routing deals: Will had deleted all routes for June 18th, starting me with a clean slate.  I made every path be for DAY. I was unable to confirm total unrouted MWH, as the real time position manager does not seem to be functioning in TESTP. The routing appeared to take 19 minutes with the status bar showing steady progress during that time. This time is 15-17 minutes longer than current speed using the Excel Macro system we have now. The error list gave me a row by row description of what did not route, a very useful tool.  OK was visible on all rows that the PSW believed that it had routed. I had difficulty checking the routing results, as I kept getting BDE errors in Scheduling after routing had occurred (Local Enpower). Scheduling kept starting up in 1899.  I was unable to login to TestP through Terminal server 2, but was able to in Terminal Server 5. The results there were very encouraging! Most routing was done, and a spot check of deals shows that they were routed properly. The deals that were not routed appear to be due to a user error of deal number duplication in the sheet. This is consistent with what I would expect. I will further evaluate routing ability with our more complicated paths later. This routing was very easy, a large point with on peak non shaped deals only.

Things I did not expect that I liked:

When I highlight a group of cells in Build Route, it stays highlighted when I move up to the scheduling sheet to highlight a comparison group of cells.  This is very handy for double checking Build route against the scheduler's sheet.

What does not appear to be working at this time:

The physical or not physical flag of path does not seem to be showing up properly in routing.

Path Confirmation:  The running time appeared to be over one hour for one sheet, only 70 rows of the sheet being flagged for insertion into confirmation. This current speed will not be sufficient to work in production. Also, many rows that were flagged for confirmation were not imported, and I cannot find an error log to help understand why deals were not imported to path confirmation.
When the path confirmation task was finished,  the application simply froze.  The status bar was no longer visible, leading me to believe that it was done, however the app was not able to be saved or closed or examined further.

My conclusions:

The build route and routing functions work well enough to use in production, the copy-paste function works well for the West desk per our connectivity issues.

Path Confirmation is not functioning at this point, and appears to be blowing up the app. No data was visible for June 18th even after the PSW ran through its import function.

Please let me know when the issues I have named have been addressed and are ready for further testing.

Thanks

Cara
503/464-3814


Transwestern Pipeline Co. posted new notice(s) since our last check at
12/12/2000 12:18:01 PM, the newest notice looks like:

 Capacity Constraint, Dec 12 2000 12:25PM, Dec 13 2000  9:00AM, Dec 14 2000
8:59AM, 2231, Allocation - SOCAL NEEDLES

Please click the following to go to the web site for detail.

http://ios.ets.enron.com/infoPostings/shared/et_noncritical_notice.asp?company
=60


Green Mountain prudency has been approved by Lavo.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lavorato, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:09 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: RE: LT Ercot Schedule C

fine

-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Tue 5/29/2001 12:56 PM
To: Lavorato, John
Cc:
Subject: FW: LT Ercot Schedule C

I need approval for this ERCOT Schedule C.   The e-mail from Stacey outlines the details.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Gilbert-smith, Doug
Sent:   Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:18 AM
To:     Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:        FW: LT Ercot Schedule C

Kevin,

This is for the full requirements uncertainty associated with green mountain and includes a reserve against teh liabilitiy exposure for the QSE agreements.

Please let me know if you have any other questions,

Doug

 -----Original Message-----
From:   White, Stacey
Sent:   Friday, May 25, 2001 3:56 PM
To:     Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:        LT Ercot Schedule C

Did you get this reserve cleared through Lavorato?  If you have not, can you do so immediately.

Thanks,
Stacey
---------------------- Forwarded by Stacey W White/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 03:54 PM ---------------------------

Untitled Attachment
Andrea Dahlke@ENRON
05/11/2001 01:59 PM
To:     Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:     Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Casey Evans/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject:        LT Ercot Schedule C

Chris and Anita-

I created a Schedule C in LT-Ercot today for ($1,713,647) relating to the BP Energy/ Green Mountain transaction.  The reserve is broken out as follows:

Description                     Volume          Reserve         Amount
Energy Reserve          (623,144)               $1.50                   ($934,717)
Ancillary Reserve               (623,144)               $1.00                   ($623,144)
QSE Reserve                     (623,144)               $0.25                   ($155,786)
TOTAL                                                                   $1,713,647

Power Structuring as provided the following amortization schedule for these reserves:

Untitled Attachment
Let me know if you have any questions.

Andrea


One more revision to the GTC.  Few changes based on my discussion with Carl
this morning.  I have attached a clean and redlined copy.  The redline is
compared against the version prior to the secondary point discussion for
Colleen's benefit.  I am fine to run with this copy from a legal perspective
unless Dick or Colleen had any comments.


It is okay to put Superior on  your list.  However, I do not know the status
of SG Interests I, Ltd.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Your valid external email address is errol.mclaughlin@enron.com.   If you have any problems receiving mail at that address please contact the resolution center.

From:	Errol McLaughlin/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/14/2002 10:41 AM
To:	Enron Messaging Administration@Enron
cc:

Subject:	RE: UPDATE: Supported Internet Email Addresses

Many times when people from outside the company try to send me e-mails they get an 'undeliverable message' response.  It's as if my e-mail address is not valid, but I know that it is b/c I get some messages.  Can someone help me w/ this.  Please call me at 713-345-8274.

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Messaging Administration
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To:	DL-GA-all_enron_worldwide1
Subject:	UPDATE: Supported Internet Email Addresses

This is a reminder that the ect.enron.com,ei.enron.com,and ees.enron.com Email domains will be decommissioned by close of business Friday, January 18th. If you currently use an Email address of name@ect.enron.com, name@ei.enron.com or name@ees.enron.com, you will need to notify your contacts to send mail to you at firstname.lastname@enron.com.

This is the first step of several to standardize everyone's Email address to firstname.lastname@enron.com.

If you have questions regarding this email, send an Email to enron.messaging.administration@enron.com.

Thank you for participation, cooperation and support.
Enron Messaging Administration


A few weeks ago I sent out an e-mail announcing Sean Crandall's departure from Enron.  Upon further consideration, Sean has decided to stay with us.  Please join me in welcoming him back from his European vacation.


ouch....never made it in on Thursday, don't know how you did it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim.Ward@enron.com [SMTP:Kim.Ward@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 8:19 AM
> To: Brad.King@usa.conoco.com
> Subject: Re: you back in the office?
>
>
> I'm back today.  Went to Phoenix EARLY Thursday morn - got back Friday
> night.  All in the name of the Big E.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "King, Brad" <Brad.King@usa.conoco.com> on 03/23/2001 01:21:36 PM
>
> To:   "'kim.ward@enron.com'" <kim.ward@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  you back in the office?
>
>
>
>
>


Can you please pull the referenced contract and lets discuss.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 10/26/99 01:56 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Heidi Withers                           10/25/99 01:07 PM

To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transportation Gathering Contract for HPL transporting on HPL

Gerald,

Due to some changes in our business, we are needing to amend the current
transportation contracts for HPL transporting on HPL.  We will need to amend
the current 012-41500-02-003 contract, covering the transportation cost from
a particular wellhead all the way to Houston Ship Channel, to become two
contracts, one we call the "gathering agreement" (covering transportation
cost from the wellhead to a competitive supply curve like Thompsonville zone
or Agua Dulce zone) and then another agreement we call "marketing
transportatin agreement" (covering transportation cost from the competitive
supply curve to Houston Ship Channel).

We need these amendments to be effective as soon as possible since we are
targeting making the administrative changes effective during November
production month.  I tried to call you but was not able to be connected to
your voice mail.

I would like to sit down with you in the next couple of days to discuss this
change and what we need to do to have the agreements changed and the new
gathering agreement put into place.  Please respond via email or call at
3-1836 to discuss this issue further.  Thanks!

Heidi Withers