The nom for KCS Resources (deal # 125822) at meter # 9658 has been revised
from 7,129 to 5,500.

Bob


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000
07:41 AM ---------------------------

Andrei Osonenko <andrei@swapsmonitor.com> on 07/27/2000 08:18:05 AM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
cc:
Subject: Swaps Monitor Research

We have today published information about our estimates of the replacement
cost of the global OTC derivatives market. This research is contained in the
attached pdf files.

Through our web site, SwapsMonitor.com, you can obtain additional information
about OTC derivatives dealers, including rankingsand a database of
outstandingsgoing back to 1994.

As an e-mail subscriber to our research, you will automatically receive all
free research at the same time it is placed on our web site. If you wish to
remove your name from the e-mailing list, please use the Reply feature of
your e-mail application and type the word "Remove" in the subject line.

Regards,

 - total_rc.pdf
Andrei Osonenko
Research Department


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lowry, Donna
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:21 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	FW: List of Counterparts

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Lowry, Donna
Subject:	List of Counterparts

Donna,

This is a list of companies we have executed trades with in the last year and may potentially trade with again.  I need to go through the list of negotiated agreements legal sent me and determine which ones are already open and executed.  The starred ones are the most used.

ABN Amro
Bear Stearns
Sanford C. Bernstein
BNP
*Chase/JP Morgan
*Credit Suisse First Boston
*Deutsche Bank
Dresdner
Frankel
Frost Securities
First Union National Bank
Garban Securities Ltd. London
*Goldman Sachs & Co
*Jeffries
Lehman
Merrill Lynch
Banque Paribas
Petrie
POSI
Raymond James
*Royal Bank of Canada Dominion
Swiss Re
*UBS


There will be a press conference by the Assembly Republicans at 10:30 a.m. PDT to announce their counter-proposal to the MOU.  This should give further insight and generate market reaction as to whether SoCal can be saved.  The Republicans are almost certain to offer something less generous that the original Davis transmission line offer.


Payback is hell for loving ribbing.  Of course I love it - I just wish
someone could tell me how to stop making Cameron so angry!  My face is fine
thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE:

Yeah, tell me about it.   (Payback for what!?!?)

So that means you DON'T enjoy my loving ribbing?

P.S. My butt still feels like there's all these rubberbands wrapped around
it......(:

Nancy Sellers

<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:
"'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"
ndavi.com>                     <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>

cc:

05/29/2001 03:25 PM            Subject:     RE:

So you packed up our entire car and left all your stuff - what a concept.

Payback is hell.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com
Subject:

The bad news is I left my bag with clothes and toiletries at the Dome.  The
good news is it's a great excuse to have to go up again this weekend!

Thanks again for everything.  Really nice with only the
principals---smaller, more intimate, less mess---and the ping pong table is
a HUGE hit.

I hope you enjoy my loving ribbing as much as I enjoy yours.

Best,
Jeff


The exchange deal numbers are 323558 and 323553.

Also, I changed the rate on Tenn deal 235293 from $.11 to $.0097.

thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2000 04:14
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
07/17/2000 12:45 PM
To: Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transport Usage

I just changed the rate on Tenn/transport uage deal 235293 from $.11 to
$.0116.  We should get back 85,155 x $.0984==$8,300 tonight.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2000 12:41
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
07/17/2000 09:39 AM
To: Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transport Usage

I just changed the rate on Algon/transport usage deal 233358 from $.26 to
$.0206.  We should get back 155,000 x $.2394 == $37,000 tonight.


Dear Vince,

Thanks again for taking the time to visit.? Both faculty and students got a
lot out of your presentations.

I have a favor to ask concerning the expense reimbursement process.? Can you
mail all travel and lodging receipts to my secretary Joan Payne at the
following address:

Joan Payne
Department of Finance
2163 CEBA
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA? 70803

Thanks,

Jim Garven

_________________________________________
James R. Garven
William H. Wright, Jr. Endowed Chair for Financial Services
Department of Finance
2158 CEBA
E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA? 70803-6308

Voice (225) 388-0477? |? Fax: (800) 859-6361

E-mail:? jgarven@lsu.edu
Home Page: http://garven.lsu.edu
Vita: http://garven.lsu.edu/dossier.html
Research Paper Archive: http://garven.lsu.edu/research.html
_________________________________________


Attached is the Weekly Report for ETS Planning, for the week ending August 10, 2001.

Please call me with any questions.

Morgan Gottsponer


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:27 PM
To:	Price, Brent A.
Subject:	FW: Funds to be wired today

fyi...sg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:22 PM
To:	Perkins, Mary; Round, Samuel
Cc:	Hickerson, Gary; Brogan, Theresa T.
Subject:	Funds to be wired today

Mary and Sam,

The attached schedule details the funds of $124.7 million to be received today from Brokerage accounts.
$85 million is being received from our funds and $40 million from other entities.  Everyone was very cooperative in getting this done this morning.
Wiring instructions have been send to the Brokers for the full $124.7 million.

We have added the Wiring instructions and exact amounts to the schedule.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barna, Peter (Equity Capital Markets)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 4:40 PM
> To: Rosenblum, Gary(CICG-GEDNY)
> Subject: SWAP Terms.......THANKS
>
>  <<ENE_TRR-Swap_6_13_legal.doc>>

 - ENE_TRR-Swap_6_13_legal.doc


sounds good.  I think we should not talk about the conversations with the
governor . . . I'd rather not prompt them to go to the gov (presumably to
object to the gov talking to us without talking to them at the same time).

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/11/2000 02:54 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Meeting w/Sempra

FYI.  Recently, Chris Calger has asked me to set up a meeting with Sempra.
ENA's seeking deals with the two big CA gas IOUs (PG&E and SoCalGas) that
would give ENA access to their assets.  In short, ENA wants to offer a
complete outsource deal for the IOUs' core gas load (i.e., rez and small
commercial customers).  ENA would take responsibility for providing service
for delivery at the city gate and in return would manage all of core's assets
(upstream of the city gate).  We're meeting with Sempra's "Chief Regulatory
Office" (Bill Reed) and Sempra's CFO next Thursday to discuss.

Given the fact that Sempra's primarily focused on electricity, the plan is to
lead off the meeting with a couple of electricity solutions as a bridge to
the gas offer.  For electricity, the plan has two pieces:  1) a commodity
offer that beats the 6.5 cent cap (i.e., nothing fancy) and 2) "Deal Bench"
services with the intent of establishing a procurement mechanism for SDG&E
that the California PUC could pre-approve (thereby eliminating some of the
immense regulatory risk SDG&E now faces).

Wanted to run this by folks to gauge reactions.  We'll distribute the slides
we're putting together as soon as they're drafted--hopefully by COB Friday.

Best,
Jeff


- contenido del suplemento n?90.pdf
 - carta nac peri?dico.doc


David, can you point D'Arcy in the right direction in ENA or ESA.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
09:11 AM ---------------------------

D'Arcy Carroll@ENRON
10/18/2000 04:14 PM
Sent by: Monica Matias@ENRON
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CV - Ex-pat realocation

I would like to introduce myself for consideration to working within your
respective groups, but also including some commercial ideas relative to the
South American region and elsewhere.

I would ask at your convenience for confirmation of your interest, or not,
and availability for meetings during the week of Oct 16th-20 in Houston.

I am available, in the meantime, to respond to any information you need,
including clarifying any of my experience at or prior to Enron.

Thank you in advance for any effort extended in my behalf.


Continental Airlines flight 722 departs Houston George Bush International
(IAH) on-time at 8:33PM Gate C-27 and arrives Denver International
(DEN) at 9:57PM.  Your Orbitz record locator for this trip is
OM7JOI.


(See attached file: HPLN1230.xls)

(See attached file: HPLN0101.xls)

 - HPLN1230.xls
 - HPLN0101.xls


this article mentions your chapter of sigma chi.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	kevin.a.boone@accenture.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew; MMMarcantel@equiva.com; Hull, Bryan
Subject:	FW: Auburn

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture -- Houston
Consultant -- Energy
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com

----- Forwarded by Kevin A. Boone/Internal/Accenture on 11/09/2001 08:39 AM
-----

            Allison Kelly
            <Allison.Kelly@tlcvision.co        To:     ash <ashley_arrington@bbs.bellsouth.com>, Kevin A.
            m>                                 Boone/Internal/Accenture@Accenture, tony
                                               <anthony.w.carter@us.pwcglobal.com>, Westy <wballard@reisscompanies.com>
            11/08/2001 09:47 AM                cc:
                                               Subject:     FW: Auburn

Those crazy kids...

-----Original Message-----
From:     Hansen, Ned [SMTP:NHansen@LucasCareers.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:NHansen@LucasCareers.com]>
Sent:     Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:56 AM
To:  Stratton, Will; Barnhill, Jim
Cc:  allison.kelly@tlcvision.com <mailto:allison.kelly@tlcvision.com>
Subject:

Racist photos of fraternity members
rocks Auburn, brings condemnation
<<...>>
By DREW JUBERA < mailto:djubera@ajc.com <mailto:djubera@ajc.com> >
Atlanta Journal-Constitution Staff Writer
<<...>>
Auburn, Ala. -- When the Southern Poverty Law Center received a call this
week about Internet photos of an Auburn University fraternity member
dressed
as a rifle-toting Klansman pretending to lynch a white student in
blackface,
the staff checked out the photo's date.

"We wanted to verify that it was taken in 2001, not 1951," said Kelvin
Datcher of the center in Montgomery that tracks incidents of bigotry. "The
kids who called us were frantic."

The photo, and others of students in blackface wearing Afros, jewelry and
jerseys with the lettering of a black fraternity, were taken this year at
Halloween parties at two fraternity houses and posted on the Internet by a
party-photo service.

The incident has rocked the campus of more than 22,000 students, which
bills
itself as "the loveliest village on the plain" and says it is intent on
recruiting minorities. As the photos illustrate, a racist, segregated past
is hard to escape.

Students at Auburn and other colleges have no personal memory of Jim Crow
segregation. But when it comes to socializing, many students gravitate
toward those of their own race. And social fraternities and sororities --
many of which used to enforce racial exclusionary clauses -- remain some of
the last bastions of segregationist attitudes.

Last year, when a black freshman applied to the University of Georgia's
all-white Alpha Gamma Delta, most of the members were adamant that she be
rejected. "If we had a black girl in our sorority, none of the fraternities
would want to do anything with us," one was quoted as saying.

That incident came to light because one sorority member, Ali Davis, filed a
racial discrimination complaint. UGA temporarily suspended Alpha Gamma
Delta
during an investigation. Davis, saying she felt ostracized, later left the
school.

Around the country, the Kappa Alpha Order, which is fond of displaying the
Confederate battle flag, has been implicated in various racial incidents in
recent years, the Southern Poverty Law Center reported.

The Louisiana Tech University chapter was placed on probation after a
confrontation with black football players in which frat members made racist
remarks, the center said. At Millsaps College in Mississippi, Kappa Alphas
dressed in Afro wigs and blackface to protest pro-minority initiatives. In
February, the KA chapter at the University of North Texas received a
five-year suspension for disorderly conduct and verbal intimidation after
some members were accused of racist remarks.

Such antics aren't limited to Kappa Alpha or the South, the Southern
Poverty
Law Center said. Several fraternities and sororities at New Hampshire's
Dartmouth College threw a "ghetto party" in which students dressed up as
urban African-Americans -- a theme that has surfaced at other campuses --
while a sorority there promoted a "slave auction" fund-raiser. The Sigma
Chi
fraternity at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln burned a cross at one of
its ceremonies.

Such incidents leave college administrators, especially those assigned to
foster diversity, wringing their hands.
"We've been working so hard to do the right thing, and then something like
this happens," Doyle Bickers, Auburn's director of admissions, said
Wednesday of the warped Halloween humor. "It breaks your heart."

"You can't escape your history," added Jim Hardin, an adviser in the
student
life center. "When something like this comes up, the question is, 'Have you
really changed, or are you just putting on a good front?' "

What has changed at Auburn, according to many black students, who make up
7.2 percent of the student body, is the administration's swift and open
reaction.

Interim President William F. Walker immediately condemned the costumes as
"shocking and outrageous" and suspended the fraternities, Beta Theta Pi and
Delta Sigma Phi. He attended a meeting of the Black Student Union and
promised a thorough but swift investigation, which is expected to be
completed within 10 days. Stories on the incident were displayed on the
university's Web site.

Delta Sigma Phi has expelled the two members who dressed as a Klansman and
his lynching victim, and suspended four others.

"Similar things have happened before," said Roland Harris, a junior
management information systems major and member of Phi Beta Sigma, one of
four historically black fraternities on campus. "But this time a lot of
people saw it, and they have to do something."

Auburn admitted its first black student, surrounded by 100 Alabama state
troopers, in 1961. The first black man pledged a traditionally white
fraternity in 1984, and there currently is one black pledge among those 24
fraternities.

Auburn's overall black population is still less than at most Southeastern
Conference universities, but stepped-up recruiting efforts led to a 24
percent increase of African-Americans admitted to this year's freshman
class. One sign of changing times: The university's Student Government
Association president is an African-American.

"We were finally beginning to say, 'Thank God, we're making some headway,'
and here comes this sad, unfortunate, damaging incident," said John
Bello-Ogunu, head of the university's office of multicultural affairs. "It
will no doubt be detrimental to our efforts to attract not only minority
students, but faculty and other staff as well."

Bello-Ogunu said the administration's reaction has been "on the mark." He
added that more action is needed, including diversity training for
fraternities. At the invitation of university officials and students, the
Southern Poverty Law Center will conduct a "mass workshop" on tolerance on
Wednesday.

Prentice Gilbert, an Auburn senior who oversees the campus' historically
black fraternities and who has helped recruit black students, said it will
take time to remedy the Halloween incident's impact.

"I have to keep reminding myself these were the actions of a few
individuals
who do not represent Auburn as a whole," Gilbert said. "This is the most
devastating blow we could take."

"The bottom line is, do we really want to be the 'Auburn family'?" he
added.
"If so, we really could become the loveliest village on the plain, as our
motto says."

Ned Hansen
Senior Recruiter - Medical Marketing
LucasGroup
Recruiting Excellence Since 1970

3384 Peachtree Rd, Ste 700
Atlanta, GA 30326
404-239-5630 Ext. 160
Fax: 404-239-5694
800-466-4489
nhansen@LucasCareers.com <mailto:nhansen@LucasCareers.com>
www.LucasCareers.com <http://www.LucasCareers.com>

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 02:02 PM -----

	Bonnie White/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/11/2001 09:43 AM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron,
lgibson@ogwb.com@SMTP@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Calpine meeting

This will confirm our meeting tomorrow morning, Thursday, April 12, at 9:00
am, to discuss our response to Calpine's motion for summary judgment and to
work on affidavits to respond to the motion.  The meeting will take place in
Conference Rm. EB 4837.

Bonnie J. White
Enron Litigation Unit
1400 Smith Street, Suite 4824
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  713-853-7244
Fax: 713-853-6576
bonnie.white@enron.com


lets meet tonight at 8


Haven't heard anything about it, though Sue's been closer to these issues.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	mday@gmssr.com; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject:	Overpaid CA UUT Refund Notice

Do you know anything about this?  Can you offer any insights?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike D Smith/HOU/EES on 09/27/2001 10:57 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey K Fischer
09/26/2001 02:38 PM
To:	Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Ronald Adzgery/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Overpaid CA UUT Refund Notice

Diann and Mike,

Attached is a notice we propose sending to our customers that were overcharged UUT as a result of PG&E's billing practices.  Because of the UUT refund statute of limitations,  the sooner the notices are sent the fewer refund dollars our customers will lose.

Please let me know if you would like to discuss the notice further or if it is acceptable for sending with the spreadsheets that Diann's group is putting together showing the amount of the potentially overpaid UUT.

Thanks,

Jeff

 << File: Customer Notice of UUT Refund.doc >>

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


I believe you have everything

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:13 AM
To:	'"Proctor, Shemin V." <sproctor@akllp.com>@ENRON'
Cc:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	RE: FW: Gas Storage Agreement with Duke Energy Field Services

All I have is what I gave to you.  Joe,  where there any other documents received from Centana?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Proctor, Shemin V." <sproctor@akllp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:04 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: FW: Gas Storage Agreement with Duke Energy Field Services

Hi Gerald,
Yesterday you gave me the gas transportation contract between CIPCO and
ENA. Do you have a copy of the firm gas storage agreement between the
parties? My no is 5-3910. Thanks

Shemin

-----Original Message-----
From: Nemec, Gerald [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Proctor, Shemin V.; Mann, Kay
Cc: mark.ellenberg@cwt.com
Subject: FW: FW: Gas Storage Agreement with Duke Energy Field Services

Kay,  Mark is aware of this transaction.  The following is his response
to Centana's counsel email.  I did discuss with Mark this morning, the
current course we are following with Centana and he agreed it made
sense.

As it stands now we would sell all the gas in-place to Centana and they
would net out post-petition fees.  Our business people feel that we have
used the storage services post-petition and consequently those fees
would be an administrative expense.  An amount equivalent to the
pre-petition fees would be held in escrow until the bankrutpcy court
resolved the pre-petition amounts.   All remaining amounts would be
delivered to Enron North America.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Mark Ellenberg" <Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com>@ENRON
> Sent:	Friday, February 15, 2002 8:22 AM
> To:	Nemec, Gerald
> Cc:	melanie.gray@weil.com; david.wolnerman@weil.com; Mann, Kay
> Subject:	Re: FW: Gas Storage Agreement with Duke Energy Field
Services
>
>
> He is wrong on just about every point.  In the few instances where he
has
> stated correct legal principles, he has misapplied them.
>
>    the bankruptcy code expressly cuts off interest on unsecured claims
as
>    of the petition date.
>    refusing to act under the contract unless prepetition debt is paid
is a
>    violation of the automatic stay.  in this regard, it should be
noted
>    that obligations maturing postpetition are still prepetition debts
to
>    the extent they arise from a prepetition contract, such as here.
>    both set off and recoupment require that there be a debt owed to
the
>    debtor by the counterparty and a debt owed by the debtor to the
>    counterparty.  here, the unstated premise of centana's position is
that
>    centana's obligation to return gas is a debt owed by it to to
enron.
>    this is wrong.  centana is merely a bailee of the gas and its
return
>    obligation is not a debt.  this is clearly established in the
cotton
>    warehouse cases i have previously sent you the cites for.
>    section 365(d)(3), on its face, only applies to leases of
nonresidential
>    real property.  a gas storage agreement is obviously not such a
lease.
>    the court has already ruled that enron deserves time to determine
>    whether to assume or reject executory contracts.  in addition, the
court
>    has ruled that parties to executory contracts are not entitled to
relief
>    from the stay or adequate protection.
>    centana should be placed on notice that they are violating the stay
by
>    demanding prepetition debt and by refusing to turn over property of
the
>    estate.  this exposes them to a contempt citation and damages.  we
>    should thank them for providing a smoking gun in the form of
richard's
>    e-mail.  in addition, they are in breach of contract for refusing
to
>    comply with enron's withdrawal requests.  this exposes them to
breach of
>    contract damages claims based on the decline in the value of gas.
>    they are entitled to be paid as an administrative expense for
storage
>    charges based on storage actually used since december 2.
>
> you should be aware that we resolved a similar standoff with ngpl by
> agreeing to immediately reject storage contracts and paying
post-petition
> administrative storage charges if they cooperated in the sale of gas
to a
> third party via in-ground transfer.  maybe that would work here.
>
>
>
>                     "Nemec,
>                     Gerald"               To:
mark.ellenberg@cwt.com
>                     <Gerald.Nemec@        cc:
>                     ENRON.com>            Subject:     FW: Gas Storage
>                     Office:               Agreement with Duke Energy
Field
>                                           Services
>                     02/14/02 05:26
>                     PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mark,  Attached is the authority under which Centana is holding
portions of>
> our gas in storage.  I will forward a copy of the storage agreement
also.
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:         "Michael S. Richards"
<msrichards@duke-energy.com>@ENRON
> > Sent:         Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:33 AM
> > To:           Nemec, Gerald
> > Cc:           Greg A. Swidensky
> > Subject:           Gas Storage Agreement with Duke Energy Field
Services
> > Importance:        High
> >
> > Gerald, this e-mail will serve as a follow-up to our telephone
> conversation
> > from the other day.  There are a number of arguments we believe we
have
> > with respect to our entitlement to pre-bankruptcy lease payments
under
> our
> > storage lease with Enron.    These arguments include our rights
under our
> > storage lease agreement, common law setoff rights, recoupment,
> > rejection/assumption and adequate protection  issues.  These issues
are
> > briefly addressed below:
> >
> >    Under the terms of our September 1, 2001 Gas Storage Agreement,
Enron
> is
> >    obligated to pay monthly interest in the amount of 1.5% for past
due
> >    lease obligations.  Currently, Enron is past due for both pre-
and
> >    post-bankruptcy lease obligations to us.  Under the terms of the
> lease,
> >    we are authorized to suspend withdrawals until all past due
> obligations,
> >    including interest, are paid.
> >    We believe that under Texas law we are entitled to common law
> recoupment
> >    and/or setoff rights.
> >    We don't know whether Enron intends to accept or reject our
storage
> >    lease.  If Enron rejects our 3 year lease, we calculate the
rejection
> >    damages for anticipatory breach to exceed $3.6 million, which is
in
> >    excess of the value of the gas.  Recoupment rights are generally
> >    available to determine a just liability on the claim of one party
> >    against another with respect to a single, indivisible contract.
> >    If recoupment is not available, setoff enables us to  offset our
> claims
> >    under the lease against Enron's claims for the gas, subject to
the
> >    automatic stay,  because mutual debts may be offset against each
other
> >    to achieve a just result.  Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors
v.
> >    Manufacturers and Traders Trust Co. (In re Bennett Funding
Group), 146
> >    F.3rd 136 (2nd Cir. 1998).
> >    Section 365(d)(3) of the Code requires that a
debtor-in-possession
> >    timely perform all of its obligations under an unexpired lease
until
> it
> >    is assumed or rejected.  Therefore, not only rent, but also other
> fees,
> >    taxes, and attorneys' fees, to the extent provided for under the
> lease,
> >    must be paid under Section 365(d)(3).  Courts have held late
charges
> for
> >    postpetition, pre-rejection lease payments to be obligations that
must
> >    be paid as administrative expense claims.  See, e.g., In re MS
Freight
> >    Distribution, Inc., 172 B.R. 976 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 1994).
> >    We believe that we are entitled to the setting of an early
deadline by
> >    the court for Enron to determine whether or not to accept or
reject
> this
> >    contract in order to protect our recoupment/setoff rights and we
> believe
> >    we are entitled to relief from the automatic stay to permit the
> exercise
> >    of the setoff rights (if recoupment should be found not to
apply).
> >    Pending such determinations, we believe that we are entitled to
hold
> the
> >    gas to preserve our recoupment/setoff rights.  See, e.g.,
Citizens
> Bank
> >    v. Strumpf, 516 U.S. 16 (1995).
> >
> > Our preference is to work out a deal with Enron for the purchase of
this
> > gas, with a credit against the purchase price for both pre- and
post-
> > bankruptcy lease obligations.  We believe we should seek bankruptcy
court
> > approval to the extent this involves pre-bankruptcy obligations.
> >
>
>
>
**********************************************************************>
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete
> all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
are not
> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
> relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise.
> Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
========================================================================
======
> NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be
legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not
read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any
attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
> that might affect any computer system into which it is received and
opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is
virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
> & Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
>
>
>
========================================================================
======
>
>
>
========================================================================
======
> NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be
legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not
read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any
attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
> that might affect any computer system into which it is received and
opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is
virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
> & Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
>
>
>
========================================================================
======
>


Mark,
The issues and unexecuted confirms are mounting where we need legal's help.  The attached list represents those issues.  I would like to sit down and discuss an action plan for addressing these issues.  I will have Holly set up a meeting for us to discuss.

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Theriot, Kim S.
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Shackleton, Sara; Cook, Mary; Sayre, Frank; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Hendry, Brent
Subject:	 Pending Legal Review and Comments
Importance:	High

Please see the attached list which details items pending for legal review and comments. The list details the issue by counterparty and the number of unsigned transactions as a result of the issue.  Can you provide me with an update as to where we stand on each item or if there is additional information needed from the confirmation team?  I would like to know which attorney has each particular Counterparty issue.  Thanks for your assistance.

Kim Theriot
x. 31771

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:16 PM
To:	Theriot, Kim S.
Subject:	Pending Legal

As we discussed....


Kay:

Here is the information on the charity golf outing we discussed.  Check out
sarahssoldiers.com for more information on Sarah and the efforts to help
her.

Attached at the bottom of this email is a pledge form.

Thanks for your support in this good cause.

Fred

---------------------- Forwarded by Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001 03:54 PM
---------------------------

Stephen Morse@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 04/12/2001 03:00:16 PM
To:

Enron Golfers:

Hey guys, Sarah Edwards is a friend of a friend's daughter who desperately
needs help to stay alive and all you duffers out there can help:

The 100 holes for golf for Sarah Edwards will be Monday June 4 at
Sweetwater CC. Sarah needs a lung transplant and
approximately $150,000 of the costs are not covered by insurance or
medicaid.

For more info on Sarah, visit Sarahssoldiers.com

Here is how the 100 holes for golf works:

*Free golf at Sweetwater
*You play as many holes as you can (100 is not mandatory)
* We provide your lunch, drinks and snacks
* You get pledges from your friends to play
*pledges may be flat amounts, per hole, per birdie or per eagle

Lets all keep Sarah alive! Can I get some other tentative commitments?

thanks!

Steve

Steve Morse
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-7137-work
713-569-7912-cell
email:  stephen_morse@enron.net

 - pledge.doc


I'd just do it going forward.  Thanks.  Michelle

Leslie Hansen
11/09/2000 04:27 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Signatory Authority for Net Works and EnronOnline

Michelle:

Should we back date to date immediately after organizational resolutions or
just ratify past acts?  Preference?

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000 04:27 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	11/09/2000 03:29 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Signatory Authority for Net Works and EnronOnline

?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000 03:29 PM -----

	Deb Korkmas
	11/09/2000 03:27 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECt, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECt
		 Subject: Re: Signatory Authority for Net Works and EnronOnline

I will prepare Unanimous Consent electing Robert Jones.  What do we want to
use as effective date?  Please advise.  Thanks, Deb

Deb Korkmas
Enron North America Corp.
ENA Legal Dept.
1400 Smith Street, Room 3819
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  713-853-5448
Fax:  713-646-3393

	Tana Jones
	11/09/2000 01:09 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Signatory Authority for Net Works and EnronOnline

Robert Jones appears to be a VP of Enron Net Works, but not EnronOnline.

By copy of this email to Deb Korkmas, I would like to confirm that the above
is correct, and if it is, can we please get Robert Jones added as a VP of
EnronOnline.

Thanks!

	Leslie Hansen
	11/09/2000 01:00 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Signatory Authority for Net Works and EnronOnline

Tana:

Does Robert Jones, HR VP, have signatory authority for Net Works and
EnronOnline?   Per Michelle Cash, he needs it since he signs employment
contracts, ect.  If he does not, we'll need to have some retroactive
resolutions prepared.

Please let me know.

Leslie


Yours????
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES on 05/16/2000 04:09
PM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen@ECT
05/16/2000 07:09 AM
To: "Frank Getman, HSE" <fgetman@houstonstreet.com> @ ENRON
cc: "'mark.taylor@enron.com'" <mark.taylor@enron.com>@ENRON,
"'dave.samuels@enron.com'" <dave.samuels@enron.com>@ENRON, Andy
Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Follow-up on Friday's meeting

I spoke to Mark yesterday and he is moving as fast as possible - it may be a
good idea to start with a detailed term sheet  whilst the fuller document is
in drafting (we will be using external counsel to speed things up).

I looked at your list of products (sent by Kevin) which is a great deal wider
than those we quote.  I think the best qay to proceed would be with a
manageable list from which we build as soon as both parties are happy with
the technology.
I have attached a draft list below (natual gas an power only so far), the
terms would be dependent of their availability.  When do you plan to
introduce financial transactions?

Due to the time difference this week - the easiest way of contacting me is
email.  I would also suggest we think about setting up a meeting for early
next week to go through the draft.

Regards

Louise

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Frank Getman, HSE" <fgetman@houstonstreet.com>
   05/15/2000 11:19 AM

To: "'mark.taylor@enron.com'" <mark.taylor@enron.com>
cc: "'dave.samuels@enron.com'" <dave.samuels@enron.com>, "Louise Kitchen
(E-mail)" <lkitchen@enron.com>

Subject: Follow-up on Friday's meeting

Hi Mark,

Thanks for taking time on Friday to participate in our meeting.  I think we
made good progress -- by the end of the day, Louise and I were able to
resolve most, if not all, major items.  Late on Friday, Kevin Sluder from my
office forwarded to Louise by email a list of the proposed markets on
HoustonStreet for which we would look to receive prices electronically from
EnronOnline.  Louise indicated that you would attempt to have a draft
agreement available late in the day on Monday or Tuesday morning.  I wanted
to confirm this timing so I can make sure I have the appropriate individuals
on my end ready to turn it around.  I think it is in everyone's interest to
try to push this forward this week.

Please let me know if you need any additional information from
HoustonStreet.

Best regards,
Frank Getman
fgetman@houstonstreet.com


Dear Priscilla,

Attached is Enron North America's GISB with special provisions.

Please give me a call at your convenience, to discuss this agreement.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Rogers,

Enron Energy Services, Inc. ("EESI") submitted application to become a NEPOOL member, to be effective January 1, 2000.  EESI was approved by the NEPOOL Participants Membership Subcommittee at its January 24, 2000 meeting.  One requirement of NEPOOL membership is to satisfy the Financial Assurance Policy for NEPOOL Members.  EESI, Enron Energy Marketing Corp, and Enron Power Marketing, Inc. are all members of NEPOOL and have chosen to satisfy the Financial Assurance Policy by issuance of Performance Bond(s), rather than corporate guaranty, due to Enron's disagreement with the Form of Corporate Guaranty required by NEPOOL.

EESI, via Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, issued a Performance Bond in the amount of $8,000,000 in June 2000; the Performance Bond was reissued in June 2001 in the amount of $8,000,000.  EESI received a letter from ISO New England dated October 10, 2001, addressed to Becky Pitre (EESI Settlements) and received by Becky probably October 12, 2001, indicating that EESI's current Performance Bond was insufficient and that EESI needed to increase the amount to $11,703,018.75 to cover EESI's current activity level.  Becky delivered the October 10th letter  to my attention whereby I took the letter to EESI Legal Department (Karen Cordova) and informed Karen that EESI needed to increase the Performance Bond to $20,000,000.  Karen requested Credit Department (Nichole Gunter) initiate an increase in the Performance Bond to the $20,000,000 level; to the best of my knowledge the initial conversation with Credit Department was October 12, 2001.  In telephone conversations with ISO-NE, Enron's Credit Department personnel were informed by ISO-NE that in order to avoid Financial Assurance Default the matter needed to be resolved within ten (10) days of the date of the October 10, 2001 letter (October 19, 2001), however the letter did not indicate such.

I was notified by Credit Department on October 16, 2001 that the bond company Enron utilizes for performance bond(s) would not process our Performance Bond request for increase until Enron paid the bond company for outstanding invoices for "other" performance bonds (bond  renewals), approximately $150,000.  The "other" performance bond invioces had been bounced around EESI, since June 2001, to various individuals (i.e. Greg Sharp, Mark Mueller, Jeff Golden, Scott Mills) and had still remained unpaid.  Payments for the "other" performance bonds were made and the bond company processed our request for increase in the EESI NEPOOL Performance Bond to $20,000,000, which was issued by the bond company on October 23, 2001, executed by EESI on October 23, 2001 and forwarded via FAX and Overnight Mail to ISO-NE on October 23, 2001.  EESI was unable to comply with the October 19, 2001 deadline to resolve the Financial Assurance Default due to complications with the bond company as mentioned above.  Credit Department personnel informed ISO-NE personnel that EESI would not meet the October 19, 2001 deadline, but was working diligently to resolve the matter; Credit Department personnel sent via FAX, a copy of the request to the bond company for revisions to the Performance Bond to ISO-NE personnel on October 19, 2001.

I notified Dan Allegretti, (Enron Government Affairs & Chariman, NEPOOL Participants Committee) of the entire situation prior to October 19, 2001.  Dan indicated that he did not think there would be any problems, but to get the matter resolved as quickly as possible. Dan advised me that the implications of the Financial Assurance Default would result in communications to the Membership Subcommittee and that when the next letter was published, the following month, EESI would no longer be listed as being in default.  On October 19, 2001 another letter was sent to Becky Pitre (EESI Settlements) from Edward McKenna, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer informing EESI that "Enron Energy Services, Inc. has not maintained the required level of financial assurance for 10 days or more, and has had a total combination of 3 financial assurance and/or payment defaults in the last 12 months, which qualifies them as having 2 (two) Level 1 defaults.  The ISO has been in contact with Enron Energy Services, Inc. through multiple telephone communications, and to date the financial assuvance default has not been cured.  Therefore, per the established procedure, we are forwarding this information to the NEPOOL Membership Subcommittee for action by them."  According to Dan Allegretti the Memberhsip Subcommittee reports to him, as Chariman of the Members Subcommittee, and he would discuss the issue with them.  The previous two Financial Assurance Defaults mentioned the October 19, 2001 letter occurred (i) December 2000, when payment was received 1-2 days late and was automatically resolved when payment was received and (ii) September 2001, when Financial Assurance Default occurred and was resolved through market activity.  To the best of my knowledge, EESI was unaware of either the December 2000 Payment Default or the September 2001 Financial Assurance Default, and no information was received by EESI from ISO-NE relative to either incidence.

According to (i) Protocal for the Initation of Membership Termination Proceedings and (ii) conversations with Dan Allegretti, the issue should be resolved with the receipt on October 24, 2001 of the Performance Bond by ISO-NE.  I have also advised the ISO-NE, in the future, to send communications to EESI's Credit Department and not EESI's Settlements.  Also, Dan Allegretti is investigating the facts leading the the October 19, 2001 letter with representatives from ISO-NE.

I left message for Molly Harris as you requested. I was able to speak to Denise Furey and Nichole Gunter, who both indicated that they would speak with Molly as they all work together.

Let me know if you need any additional information.

Richard


RPI TO INITIATE PHASE II CLINICAL TRIALS ON ANTI-HEPATITIS C DRUG

BOULDER,  Colorado  -  September  28,  2000: Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RPI)  (NASDAQ:RZYM)  today announced that it has repurchased its rights to
Heptazyme?  from  Eli Lilly and Company and will initiate Phase II clinical
trials  as  soon  as  possible  for  the Anti-Hepatitis C ribozyme to study
dose-ranging  and  biological  markers  of  the  drug's efficacy in chronic
Hepatitis C patients.

Earlier  this month, RPI and Eli Lilly and Company completed a 28 day study
of Heptazyme (LY466700) following daily subcutaneous injections that showed
successful  safety,  tolerability  and pharmacokinetics.  The next phase of
clinical trials will examine the safety and efficacy of Heptazyme alone, at
higher  doses  than  used  in  previous  studies,  and  in combination with
interferon,  a  current  treatment  for  patients  with  Hepatitis C  virus
infection.

Lilly has directed the clinical trials for the Anti-Hepatitis C ribozyme to
date   under   a   licensing   agreement  between  the  parties.   Ribozyme
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  has now renegotiated the global rights to Heptazyme
and  will  direct  all  subsequent  clinical trials.  The Phase II trial is
expected to begin in the first quarter of 2001.

"We  are  pleased  to  be  able  to repurchase Heptazyme rights and to have
resources  to  develop  it aggressively," said Ralph E. Christoffersen, CEO
and  President  of RPI.  "We are committed to address the need for improved
therapies  for  HCV,  and  plan  to  move forward as quickly as feasible in
Heptazyme's development."

Ribozymes   are  the  product  of  Nobel  Prize  winning  science  and  are
synthetically engineered to act as "molecular scissors" capable of cleaving
target RNA in a highly specific manner.

RPI (www.rpi.com), located in Boulder, Colorado, is the acknowledged leader
in ribozyme therapeutic development.  RPI has recently announced a ribozyme
commercial  development  program  to develop a ribozyme therapeutic against
Hepatitis  B.  RPI is partnered with Chiron Corporation for the development
and  commercialization  of ANGIOZYME?, an anti-angiogenic ribozyme designed
to  inhibit  the  growth  of new blood supplies to tumors and prevent tumor
growth  and  metastasis.   ANGIOZYME  is  in  Phase I/II clinical trials in
cancer  patients  at  the  Cleveland Clinic.  RPI is also partnered with an
affiliate  of Elan Corporation plc for development and commercialization of
HERZYME?, an anti-HER-2 ribozyme for treatment of breast and other cancers,
through RPI's subsidiary Medizyme Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

RPI  will  have  a Live Webcast regarding this information today at 3:00 pm
MDT.  This webcast can be accessed through the RPI website (www.rpi.com) in
the Investor Relations section.

This  press  release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and  uncertainties,  and  actual  events  or results may differ materially.
These   risk   factors   include   actions   by  the  U.S.  Food  and  Drug
Administration,   technological  advances,  ability  to  obtain  rights  to
technology, ability to obtain and enforce patents, ability to commercialize
and  manufacture  products  and  general  economic  conditions.  These  and
additional  risk  factors  are  identified  in  RPI Securities and Exchange
Commission  filings,  including  the  Forms  10-K and 10-Q and in other SEC
filings.


Mike:
My Dad has the tickets and is going to keep them with him.  He doesn't want
them to get lost in the mail.  We are staying in Cincinatti and are driving
over Sat and Monday for the games.  The best thing to do is meet at a certain
gate # or the "will call window".  I will call your Dad next week and set
things up on a meeting place before the game.  Leave me your Dad's home
number so I can call him next week.  These guys are going to have a great
time that weekend.  Talk to you soon.
Ben
Home #: 713-355-8738
Work #: 713-853-7998


calendar
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001
01:04 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark E Haedicke/Enron@EnronXGate@enronXgate on 07/06/2001 12:22 PM
Sent by: Janette Elbertson/ENRON@enronXgate
To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard B Sanders/Enron@enronXgate, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Greg
Whalley/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/EES@EES, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly
Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Twanda Sweet/ENRON@enronXgate, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Liz M
Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, Jan Cooley/ENRON@enronXgate, Jessica
Ramirez/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Meeting Notice - California Document Production Issues

There will be a meeting on Monday, July 9, from 10:00 a.m. to Noon in EB3321
to discuss the referenced issues.

Thank you.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail address:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


Since Alfredo received them from the customer, I thought each of you would be
interested in the progress of Enron Directo in Spain.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 25/01/2001
19:36 ---------------------------

	From:  Alfredo Huertas                           22/01/2001 11:10

To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Enron Directo weekly performance

FYI,

a.
---------------------- Forwarded by Alfredo Huertas/LON/ECT on 22/01/2001
11:13 ---------------------------

Jose Luis Gomez-Banovio
19/01/2001 17:38
To: Naomi Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Anthony Key/LON/ECT@ECT, Charlie Crossley
Cooke/LON/ECT@ECT, Alfredo Huertas/LON/ECT@ECT, David Gonzalez/LON/ECT@ECT,
Ignacio Soneira/MAD/ECT@ECT, Gonzalo Gomez-Navarro/MAD/ECT@ECT, Eric
Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Mariano Gentilini/LON/ECT@ECT, Jude
Atkinson/LON/ECT@ECT, Daniel Maitland/LON/ECT@ECT, Diana Higgins/LON/ECT@ECT,
Alex Perkins/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Mead/LON/ECT@ECT, Pedro Del Rio
Alcalde/LON/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/LON/ECT@ECT, Sarah Gregory/LON/ECT@ECT,
Kyran Hanks/LON/ECT@ECT, Julie Green/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Saltiel/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron Directo weekly performance

FYI, see below some basic performance indicators of Enron Directo:

For further details, please let me know/ Jose L


The hockey dad convicted of beating another father to death at their sons' hockey practice was sentenced.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/

ABCNEWS.com:  Up to the Moment, Up to You (tm)
http://abcnews.go.com
---
You received this mail because you subscribed via ABCNEWS.com. If you would like to stop receiving these mailings, log into our mailcenter at http://login.mailpref.go.com/unsubscribe .

Please do not respond to this mail. Questions or comments can be submitted at
http://abcnews.go.com/service/help/abccontact.html


You are the best!

	Justin Boyd/Enron@EUEnronXGate
	05/30/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: EOL Trades with Glencore Commodities Limited

will do.
j

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: 30 May 2001 14:10
To: Boyd, Justin
Subject: RE: EOL Trades with Glencore Commodities Limited

Thanks Justy, maybe you can just fax me a copy of your PA or ETA, so I can
have a copy of the document when I speak to them.  My fax no. is
713/646-3490.  Thanks!

	Justin Boyd/Enron@EUEnronXGate 05/30/2001 04:32 AM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: RE: EOL Trades with Glencore Commodities
Limited

Hi Tana

Thanks for the note.....!

I am looking for the original letter we signed with Glencore, but from my
recollection, all we said to Gencore was that the choice of law under any
master or other trading agreement between Enron and Glencore was unaffected
by the choice of English law under the UK PA or ETA.  This of course is not
quite the same as Glencore's view below!

J

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: 29 May 2001 20:05
To: Boyd, Justin
Subject: EOL Trades with Glencore Commodities Limited

Justin,

Per the email below, before we respond to Glencore we just wanted to make
sure that you haven't made any agreements with Glencore with respect to
choice of law for the online trades that would subject them to UK law.

I don't want to talk to them without checking with you first since this is
one of the true counterparties that we are trading with on both sides of the
Atlantic.

By the way, I heard you had some really good news.  I'm so happy for you!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 01:53 PM -----

	Diane Anderson@ENRON 05/29/2001 11:29 AM 	   To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:
Patrick Mulvany/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: EOL
Trades with Glencore Commodities Limited

Tana -

Please see the email below - can you please look into Glencore's
assertion that their EOL trades (vs. ENA) should be governed under English
law.

Thanks,
Diane
3.0443

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001
11:26 AM ---------------------------
From: Debbie Nicholls/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 05/29/2001 03:42 PM GDT
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane
Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: EOL Trades with Glencore Commodities Limited

Hi,

I have received a call from Miriam in Glencore re EOL transactions.  Her
concerned are that she does not receive the confirmations within 24 Hours
(from Houston) of the deal being dealt which we are subject to in London and
she would like to see this from ENA.  Also, when Glencore agreed to trade EOL
transactions they stipulated that English law be used for all transactions,
presuming these would be the same from ENA.  She has tried to call but only
gets voice mail, could you please contact her to discuss these and any other
issues she has with EOL.

Tel: 44 20 7412 3190

Regards,

Debbie


Thanks to all of you who responded.  I will briefly describe what we think
the play is based on the input provided.

 Bob Hanson, Jennifer Rudolph and Roger Yang "scored" with providing the
information below.

Most likely the consultant will suggest converting accounts on AL-TOU,
AY-TOU, and AO-TOU to one of the following rate schedules: AV-1 AV-2, and
AV-3.  These are general service variable TOU rate schedules.  The purpose of
these rate schedules was to send the customer price signals to curtail during
times when the transmission system was constrained.  Like many of UDC
experimental programs, customers often did better on this rate schedule,
compared to their otherwise applicable rate schedule, even if they did not
follow the price signals.

That loop hole is being closed by SDG&E.  They have a draft decision from the
CPUC changing the distribution rate components associated with these rate
schedules, thus closing the loop hole.  Based on these changes, customers
should pay significantly more than their otherwise applicable rate schedule,
unless they follow the price signals.  If the customery follows the price
signals this program is like a curtailable program or RTP program.  The
customer would have to shut down load or use DG during high priced hours.

I expect we have not heard the last from these individuals.

Just for the record this is what we think the play is.  The consultant will
not share their strategy with the customer until after a contract is signed.
Normally the up-front consultant fee is between $8K - $15K and then a 50/50
sharing of the savings over 3 years.

SDG&E also charges a setup fee, which includes special equipment, of $4500 to
be on these AV rate schedules per account.

George Waidelich
NES- WEST
925-543-3801
---------------------- Forwarded by George Waidelich/SFO/EES on 10/10/2000
10:13 AM ---------------------------

George Waidelich
10/06/2000 05:10 PM
To: Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Ress Young/HOU/EES@EES, Brian Dafferner/HOU/EES@EES,
Ken Detina/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES,
Ronald G Mentan/SFO/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, John Woodman/SFO/EES@EES, Frank Wanderski/HOU/EES@EES,
Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Walton Agnew/HOU/EES@EES, Dirk
vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
Subject: Market Intelligence - USI Corporation - Help

I am trying to find out if anybody knows anything about USI Corporation.
They are a rate hawk out of San Juan Capistrano, CA. (So Cal).

They have approached Albertsons, who we are currently working with, about
entering into an agreement with them.  They are promising a 15 - 20% savings
($4-5MM) for their stores in SDG&E territory, just by putting them on another
applicable utility rate that nobody is aware of  "loop hole".  Of course,
they will not share this information until Albertsons has signed a contract.

The contacts we have been negotiating with have told them to get lost but USI
went over their heads to senior management who is now asking for an
explanation.

From a commodity origination and account management perspective a rate hawk,
if hired, is just going to cause problems.

Any information that anybody can provide on:

1.  The Company
2.  There pitch in CA
3.  More specifically, their possible "loop hole or play" in SDG&E territory,
would me much appreciated.

Please forward this message to anybody that might be able to help.

Is there an SDG&E interuptible tariff or a new ISO interuptible tariff that
can generate this kind of savings?

Thanks,

George Waidelich
NES - West
925-543-3801


Enron Recruitment Technology is launching a new, easy to use, web-based
Employee Referral Program.

 This new site will help you to help Enron find the talent it needs.
Referrals are one of the best sources of talent for Enron in terms of quality
and fit with Enron's culture. We have found that referrals stay with the
company longer and adapt faster than those hired through other sources. This
site will help us run a world-class employee referral program with less work
and better results.

 There are also incentives for you. If you refer a candidate who is hired,
you could be eligible to receive a cash reward of up to $5,000.

 So help someone accelerate their career, make yourself some money, and help
us realize our mission of being the World's No. 1 Company.

 Check out the site - http://enron.referrals.com/promo.asp - let us know what
you think -- we want to hear from you. This application should make referring
easier for you so if you have suggestions that would enhance the program,
send us an e-mail (Referral.Station@enron.com) or contact the Referral
Station at (713) 345-3254, option 2.

 David Oxley

;


Christian:  What do you think about Pat's response?  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:00 AM
To:	Yoder, Christian
Cc:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	FW: California counsel

Christian:  What do you think about Pat's response?  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Boylston, Pat" <PGBOYLSTON@stoel.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Boylston+2C+20Pat+22+20+3CPGBOYLSTON+40stoel+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 7:16 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: California counsel

I apologize for not getting back to you, Sara.  Things have gone a
little nuts here, as I am sure they have in Houston.

My basic question about whether I am the right guy for you is:  Do you
really want to sue this firm if things turn bad?  Wouldn't you rather
turn on a firm which doesn't have an ongoing relationship with Enron?

In other words, what good is an outside opinion to you really if its
contradicts the in-house opinion your receive.  What good is it if it
just confirms the in-house opinion but is wrong.

My suggestion would be to seek an opinion from Glendale's outside
financing counsel.  That should give you a clear signal whether outside
counsel with independent skin in the game is willing to back the City's
opinion.

Sorry I am not being more help on this.  Let me know if there is more to
talk about.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:31 PM
To: Boylston, Pat
Subject: FW: California counsel

Pat:  I never received a response from you.  Are you the lawyer
available to assist me in this matter?  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Shackleton, Sara
> Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 1:35 PM
> To:	'"Boylston, Pat" <PGBOYLSTON@stoel.com>@ENRON'
> Subject:	RE: California counsel
>
> Pat:
>
> I am accepting an inhouse opinion from the City of Glendale.  However,
> I would like for Enron North America Corp. ("ENA", the swap
> counterparty to Glendale) to engage independent counsel for its own
> benefit.  The opinion would be given to ENA.  If you're the guy,
> please call me.  Thanks.
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron Wholesale Services
> 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
> Houston, TX  77002
> Ph:  (713) 853-5620
> Fax: (713) 646-3490
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Boylston, Pat" <PGBOYLSTON@stoel.com>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Boylston+2C+20Pat+22+20+3CPGBOYLSTON+40stoel+2Ec
> om+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 12:46 PM
> To:	Yoder, Christian; Shackleton, Sara
> Cc:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
> Subject:	RE: California counsel
>
> Read the message.  I think we can help.  My question is, who is this
> opinion going to be given on behalf of.  If it is from the City of
> Glendale to Enron, the logical firm to give it is Glendale's "bond
> counsel" since that is the outside law firm which 1) knows municipal
> finance, 2) has an existing relationship with the City and 3) isn't
> going to get into conflicts issues (which we probably would if we were
> going to deliver an opinion on behalf of Glendale to Enron).
>
> We think the Jones, Hall firm in San Francisco may be bond counsel to
> Glendale, but perhaps not.  Let me know how we can help.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yoder, Christian [mailto:Christian.Yoder@ENRON.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:37 AM
> To: Shackleton, Sara
> Cc: Boylston, Pat; Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
> Subject: RE: California counsel
>
>
> I would first talk to Pat Boylston at Stoel Rives 503-294-9116.  Stoel
> Rives has recently opened a San Francisco office and Pat, who will
> know
> about 90% of the stuff to give the opinion, can probably find a
> California attorney from their office to finish it off. ----cgy
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: 	Shackleton, Sara
> > Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 9:25 AM
> > To:	Sager, Elizabeth; Yoder, Christian
> > Subject:	California counsel
> >
> > I need outside counsel to render an opinion as to the authority of
> the
> > City of Glendale to enter into financial swaps.  Do you have a
> > recommendation?
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Sara Shackleton
> > Enron Wholesale Services
> > 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
> > Houston, TX  77002
> > Ph:  (713) 853-5620
> > Fax: (713) 646-3490
> >
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
> disclosure
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
> sender
> or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
> and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
> create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
> Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
> other
> party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract
> by
> estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Hi Vince,

Hope all is well with you. I'm looking forward to seeing you again next
week and meeting with Grant. Can you guys do me  favour? I'm sending out
some sample chapters to the people who responded positively (all of them!)
to my request for some feedback on the book. Chapter 1 has an 'overview' of
the book with just a couple of sentences on each chapter. Could you please
write a sentence or two for your chapter?

I'm including what I have already written so that you can see the style.

Many thanks and best regards.

Chris.

2 Overview of this Book

This book aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the pricing and risk
management of energy derivatives.  In the remainder of this chapter we give
an overview of the fundamental principals needed to model and price energy
assets, and which underlie the rest of the book.  As well as introducing
the techniques that underlie the Black-Scholes modelling framework we
discuss the numerical techniques of trinomial trees and Monte Carlo
simulation for derivative pricing which are used extensively later in the
book.

In Chapter 2 we analyse spot energy prices.  Apart from describing
empirical prices we propose a number of processes that can be used to model
the prices. We look at the well-know process of GBM as well as mean
reversion, stochastic volatility and jump processes, discussing each, and
showing how they can be simulated and their parameters estimated.

Chapter 3, written by Vince Kaminski and Grant Masson of Enron Capital and
Trade .

Chapter 4 examines forward curves in the energy markets.  Although such
curves are well understood and straight forward in the world debt markets
the difficulty of storage in many energy markets leads to less well defined
curves.  What we do in this chapter

Chapter 5 presents an overview of the common and not-so-common derivative
structures in the energy markets and discusses their uses.  Examples of
products analysed in this chapter include a variety of swaps, caps, floors
and collars, as well as energy swaptions, compound options, Asian (or
average rate) options, Barriers, lookbacks, and ladder options.

Chapter 6 investigates single and multi-factor models of the energy spot
price and the pricing of some standard energy derivatives.  Closed form
solutions for forward prices, forward volatilities, and European option
prices are derived and presented for all the models in this chapter
including a three factor stochastic convenience yield and interest rate
model with jumps.

Chapter 7 shows how the prices of path dependent and American style options
can be evaluated for the models in chapter 6.  Simulation schemes are
developed for the evaluation of European style options and applied to a
variety of path dependent options.  In order to price options which
incorporate early exercise opportunities, a trinomial tree scheme is
developed.  This tree is built to be consistent with the observed forward
curve and can be used to price exotic as well as standard American style
options.

Chapter 8 develops a new methodology for valuing energy options based on
modelling the market observed forward curve.  The approach results in a
multi-factor model that is able to capture realistically the evolution of a
wide range of energy forward curves and where the user defined volatility
structures can be of an extremely general form.  Closed-form solutions are
developed for pricing standard European options and efficient Monte Carlo
schemes for exotic options.  The chapter finishes with a discussion of the
valuation of American style options.

Chapter 9 focuses on the risk management of energy derivative positions.
In this chapter we discuss the management of price risk for institutions
that sell options or other derivatives to a client and who is then faced
with the problem of managing the risk through time.  We begin with delta
hedging a portfolio containing derivatives and look at extensions to gamma
hedging - using the models from chapters 5 and 7.  The general model of
chapter 7 ideally suited to multi-factor hedging and this is also
discussed.

Chapter 10 looks at the key risk-management concept of Value at Risk
applied to portfolios containing energy derivative portfolios.  After
discussing the concept of the measure, we look at how the key inputs
(volatilities, covariances, correlations, etc) can be estimated.  We then
compare the fours major methodologies for computing VaR; Delta,
Delta-gamma, historical simulation and Monte-Carlo simulation.  Finally, we
look at testing the VaR estimates for various underlying energy market
variables.

Finally, we finish with credit risk in energy markets in chapter 11.


Kate,

Not yet. I will know sometimes in August - September.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kate Szablya" <kate@powerbrokersllc.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kate+20Szablya+22+20+3Ckate+40powerbrokersllc+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:39 PM
To:	Vince Kaminski
Subject:	Hope you're staying dry!

Hi Vince,

I just thought I'd check in to see if you had resolved  your space issue for your analysts.  If so, I would love to send you some  people to consider for your team!

Hope your summer is going well and that you are surviving all  the rain!  I recently spent a week rafting through the Grand  Canyon...an adventure I would highly recommend.

Hope to hear from you!

Regards,

Kate Szablya
Power Brokers, LLC
Energy Search and  Recruitment
303-716-2987
303-619-7589 cell
303-716-3426 faxwww.powerbrokersllc.com << File: http://www.powerbrokersllc.com >>


perhaps you were a little strong in relaying my concerns to someone?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000 12:27 PM -----

	mbaldwin@igservice.com
	12/07/2000 12:19 PM

		 To: "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc: "Jeff Fawcett" <jfawcet@enron.com>
		 Subject: Media Inquiries

Jeff,

It has come to my attention that you were concern by some of my comments
recently televised on CH. 2. Let me try to  fill in the blanks. First, the
interview lasted almost 45 minutes of actual camera time. Of course, the
news media took their usually advantage of editing "for their agenda" what
they wanted. The risk you take in any situation like this. During the course
of the interview, I made it quite clear that it would be a mistake to lay
California's current natural gas problems on the doorstep of deregulation.
No one should question I am strongly in favor of gas deregulation in the
state.

On a more direct point, Mr. Vacar was clearly trying to get me to confirm
what he had already been told before my interview that the culprit here was
Enron Online. I disagreed with that conclusion yesterday and this morning.
About 1/2 hour ago, Mr. Vacar phone me to presumably find out what natural
gas prices where doing in the spot market. He quickly brought the
conversation back to Enron Online. I told him that it would be a mistake to
blame these current day prices on Enron Online. While it is convenient for
some to look for a simple singular answer or someone to blame, the answer
isn't Enron Online. He went on to reason that Enron is such a large energy
company they could conceivably "do this". I responded that would also be a
mistake. I acknowledged Enron as a large player but in no way capable of
running up California Gas prices because of some "perceived dominance".

Yesterday, I shared my concern that Mr. Vacar was directing his inquiries
toward Enron with Mr. Fawcett. Obviously , I reserve my right to call them
like I see them independent from anyone of my clients own agendas and will
continue to do so. The source of potential allegations against Enron isn't
me. If I can clarify anything else let me know.

Mark, IGS


Karen,

Can you see the questions for RISI and refine them a bit?

Thank you
Monika


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001
06:01 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 04/27/2001 05:00:36 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp043001.pdf


Tuesday, March 12, 2002

Dear Debra,

Travelocity Fare Watcher, your personal airfare tracking
service, has found fare changes in 1 of your markets.

Note: Fares change quickly and sell out fast. Visit Travelocity
now to take advantage of this great opportunity!  Click on this
link or paste the URL into your browser:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemindiv.ctl?fw=99091015983150&Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

HAVE YOUR TRAVEL NEEDS CHANGED?

Looking to go someplace new? Be sure to update your Fare Watcher
subscription to include your favorite destinations.

FARES

*  QHO-ABQ   FROM: Houston All Airports (QHO)
             TO:   Albuquerque, NM (ABQ)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE        WAS        DIFFERENCE
             ---------      -------      ----------
             $198.00        $142.00      +$56.00

GREAT HOTEL DEALS!

Travelocity.com offers Value Rates at great hotels in:
Albuquerque, NM (ABQ) starting at just $49
Click: http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=ABQ&rate_cat=V

Thank you for choosing Travelocity as your one-stop travel
resource!

Sincerely,

The Travelocity Team
Travelocity.com - Go Virtually Anywhere
http://www.travelocity.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------

VACATION DEALS!

Hot deals to the Caribbean, Las Vegas, and more!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_VAC,00.html

CRUISE DEALS!

Don't miss a look at our incredible Cruise Deals! Updated daily,
find the voyage that suits your budget!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_CRU,00.html

SAVE $75 IN AIRFARE

Save up to $75 on Airline Tickets!
Join the Travelocity Preferred Program and you'll receive up to $75
in cash rebates on your next three flights, hotel savings and room
upgrades, up to 20% off at restaurants nationwide, and more.  Join today!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/preferred/?source=PM

EARN FREE TRAVEL. NO RESTRICTIONS!

The NEW Travelocity World MasterCard
Earn points towards free travel with new Travelocity MasterCard!
You'll earn 1 point for every dollar spent. Earn 8,000 points
and you'll receive $100 off your next Travelocity.com booking.
We'll spot you 4,000 points to get started, so you are already
half way there!
Visit http://www.travelocitycard.com/index.cgi?mktcode=2201128602&PageID=stnd to apply.

IMPORTANT FARE INFORMATION:

*Fares shown are for one adult and are subject to
additional charges, including, but not limited to, Passenger Facility
Charges (ranging from $2-$18), Federal Segment Fees of $3.00 per segment
(defined as a takeoff and a landing), September 11th Security Fee
(maximum of $5 one way or $10 round trip), and taxes/fees associated
with international itineraries up to $113. Fuel surcharges, if
applicable, are included in the fares listed.

Total fare per passenger, including all charges, will always
be displayed to you prior to final ticket purchase. Please note
that fares are subject to restrictions, may not be available on
all flights, and may change without notice. For detailed descriptions
of the fare rules, click on the corresponding rules link.

CHANGE OR CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO FAREWATCHER EMAIL
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

RETRIEVE YOUR PASSWORD
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognpwdform.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN


>From: "Ordonez, Edwin" <Edwin.Ordonez@us.cibc.com>
>To: "'edo711@hotmail.com'" <edo711@hotmail.com>
>Subject: FW: Jordan Estate
>Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:25:29 -0500
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Josh Kuethe [mailto:JKuethe@diagnosticimaging.net]
>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:46 AM
>To: 'atlbch29@aol.com'; 'arch001@aol.com'; 'KBsigGolf@aol.com';
>'greatscotty1@aol.com'; 'akeman25@aol.com'; Ty Roberts; Steve Papas;
>Matt Papas
>Subject: FW: Jordan Estate
>
>
>Michael Jordan's Estate - This is what his wife wants in the divorce.
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

 - JordanEstate.jpg


Tim

Can you get someone (perhaps a marketer) to give me a one pager on the WAPA
deal.


---------------------- Forwarded by Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 11:47
AM ---------------------------

Yortex@aol.com on 10/17/2000 09:49:57 AM
To: CILISKEK@aol.com, PAFMAN1@aol.com, Fdmcall@aol.com,
lbourdon@earthlink.net, Jdixon9@ix.netcom.com, jpb@transmeta.com,
mbanning@loop.com, Eddietudor@aol.com, Scobba@aol.com, bernardx@argusx.com,
TimBe@acespower.com, EODTmLdr@aol.com, BourneB@umsystem.edu,
Walter.Bush@agg.com, DWC3@pge.com, Davec@wvpa.com (David Claspell),
RCone@hdinc.com, jdorrier@ix.netcom.com, john.eckel@copanoenergy.com,
Sirraf415@aol.com, Mcfischer2@aol.com, BFlanders@aol.com,
gilbert.flores@gt.pge.com, bnfox@swbell.net, BryanKFrey@aol.com,
ClarkGen12@cs.com, GilbertS@valero.com, DDGUEBERT@aol.com,
panamsec@caoba.entelnet.bo, agholcomb@scs-law.com, abi@cybermesa.com,
Jstark@siliconenergy.com, JONESW@haynesboone.com, eajones@texas.net,
mscottjones@earthlink.net, Kkaysvet@aol.com, stanj@flash.net, Charley Keller
<charleykeller@prodigy.net>, sakom@ibm.net, lizard_ar@yahoo.com,
Sharon.Lay@travelpark.com, Rod@lewisenergy.com, frl3@pge.com, Clpent@aol.com,
bmartinwa@earthlink.net, leilam@scdsschool.org,
frank.mcallister@copanoenergy.com, emcculloch@siliconenergy.com,
TMerrell@mail.bokf.com, amize@downstreamenergy.com, tjohnson@chemtrend.com,
llmountc@cmsenergy.com, jnesser@eprod.com, Frank.G.Newman@enron.com,
jpirraglia@usacompression.com, lpurcell@houston.rr.com,
dutch.quigley@enron.com, spreynolds@mindspring.com, Kirk Richard
<richardkb@worldnet.att.net>, rogers280@earthlink.net, damsport@hotmail.com,
sheppard_nancy@jpmorgan.com, djs37@earthlink.net,
kyle.sherrington@gt.pge.com, shoaft@valero.com, m.shute@eudoramail.com,
Jill@lewisenergy.com, sorrells@bartona.com, Marks@lewisenergy.com,
mikes@acespower.com, sarah.j.stokes@usahq.unitedspacealliance.com,
ROBSTULL@aol.com, gswearingen@tesoropetroleum.com, CWOLF466@aol.com,
thompsonme@cl.uh.edu, rick.tobias@gt.pge.com, Tudors1998@aol.com,
christopher.a.york@lmco.com, Yorkmnc@aol.com, york@its.caltech.edu,
riskadvisors@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Our Friend Al in Vietnam

Return-path: <CLAFFEE1@aol.com>
From: CLAFFEE1@aol.com
Full-name: CLAFFEE1
Message-ID: <6d.aa17e22.271dac63@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:21:39 EDT
Subject: My Friend Al
To: Yortex@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_7e.b9a7b47.271dac63_boundary"
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 125

Paul

You'll like this one.

I'll have the time to write you a longer letter in a couple of days.

Jim