Steve:

As you requested, the following is a detailed update on pipeline safety
legislation currently moving through Congress:

Pipeline safety reauthorization legislation

Authorization for pipeline safety programs, as administered by the U.S. Dept.
of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), is currently set to
expire at the end of FY 2000.    At the beginning of the 106th Congress,
industry was focused on securing a simple, two year re-authorization bill
that basically extends current pipeline safety programs with some modest
increases in funding levels.  In fact, the House Commerce Committee (who
shares jurisdiction over pipeline safety with the Transportation &
Infrastructure Committee) acted early in 1999 to pass a simple, two year
reauthorization bill (H.R. 1378).

Unfortunately, the issue became more complex from that point.   A serious
liquid pipeline accident in Bellingham, Washington that occurred last summer,
killing several children, dramatically changed the debate over pipeline
safety.   Members of the House and Senate from Washington state (backed by
the governor and numerous state and local officials) moved swiftly to
introduce legislation that they feel is designed to address some of the
shortcomings in federal pipeline regulation that they believe may have
allowed the Bellingham incident to occur.

In the Senate, Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) has introduced S. 2004, which is
designed to expand State authority over interstate pipelines in several new
areas, such as inspection and testing, emergency response plans, leak
detection, and operator training and qualification.   The bill also would
authorize a large increase in OPS funding through pipeline user fees, to
increase the amount of grants to the States, allow for hiring of additional
inspectors, and increase R&D for inspection and leak detection technologies.
The current OPS budget is around $36 million (with $30 million from user
fees) -- the Murray bill would authorize $50 million in FY2001, which would
require a sizeable increase in user fees.  Senator Slade Gorton (R-WA) has
recently decided to co-sposnor the Murray bill, and will be actively involved
in trying to gain Republican support for the bill.   On the House side, Rep.
Jack Metcalf (R-WA) has introduced a similar bill, H.R. 3558, which a number
of the Washington representatives have co-sponsored.

Interstate natural gas pipelines have been placed in a very difficult
situation.    The Bellingham incident was a liquid pipeline accident, and
liquids pipelines generally have less stringent regulatory requirements than
natural gas pipelines.   The Washington delegation has highlighted the fact
that 280 deaths and 1500 injuries have occurred over the past 14 years
related to natural gas pipeline incidents, but they fail to distinguish the
fact that almost all of those incidents were on LDC systems (which
ironically, are entirely State regulated).  Only 39 fatalities in that period
were natural-gas related, and the majority of those accidents were caused by
third party damage.  In short, the INGAA crowd is being dragged down by the
poor records of the LDCs and the liquid pipelines.

The calls for more state regulation of interstate pipeline are largely
misguided, based on the fact that the interstate pipelines under federal
regulation have an exemplary safety record.   In addition, OPS is already
working on a "Pipeline Integrity" Rulemaking that would implement a number of
additional measures to prevent accidents on federally-regulated pipelines.

As you mentioned, INGAA has not been doing the best job representing us on
these issues.  They have been working in a group effort with API, AGA, and
the Association of Oil Pipelines (AOPL) to try and deflect the negative
claims of the Murray and Metcalf legislation, but have not been forceful
enough in distinguishing interstate natural gas pipelines' positive record
from the liquids and LDCs.  Thus, they have given the impression that INGAA
companies might be willing to submit to additional regulation that liquids
and LDC are under political pressure to submit to due to Bellingham.  We have
been working with other major INGAA companies (El Paso, in particular) to
make sure that the perspective and positive record of our natural gas
pipelines is heard clearly by the key legislators.

The odds of these measures (S. 2004, H.R. 3558) passing on their own is
fairly slim.   They will get a great deal of attention, however.  The Senate
Commerce Committee held a field hearing in Bellingham, Washington yesterday,
at which Senators Gorton and Murray testified along with OPS and the families
of Bellingham victims -- the press coverage was not good (i.e., USA Today
cover story "When Pipelines Are Time Bombs").   These bills (or portions of
them) will likely be offered and considered as amendments to Pipeline Safety
Reauthorization legislation as it comes before the House Transportation &
Infrastructure and Senate Commerce Committee later this year.

The increased controversy caused by these bills will likely doom efforts to
pass a pipeline safety reauthorization bill this year.   The leadership of
the House and Senate Committees will not likely want to face a bitter debate
between safety advocates, OPS, States, and industry in their committees in
this tough election year.   While this is probably a good sign, there is an
increased risk that industry may face some large hurdles in the
appropriations process.

Appropriations Legislation

While Members of Congress push for their stand alone bills and/or amendments
to reauthorization bills, the greater danger is that some of these issues
will be dealt with in an appropriations context.    In particular, the fact
that Senator Slade Gorton is now actively engaged in pushing for extensive
pipeline safety reforms is troubling -- he is a key member of the Senate
Appropriations Committee, is close to Republican leadership, and has a tough
re-election fight coming up.   Senator Murray is also on Senate
Appropriations.  Both are on the Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee,
which funds OPS.

It is quite likely that the Senators will make a push to get increases in the
OPS budget for FY 2001 that would enable the kinds of reforms contemplated by
their stand-alone legislation (more state funding, more inspectors, more
R&D).  Much of this increase would be funded through increases in user fees.
INGAA indicates that it expects we could be facing increases in the range of
10-15% from FY2000.   There is also the possibility that an attempt will be
made to add legislative riders to the OPS appropriations -- such as requiring
OPS to mandate inspections, increase operator qualifications, or allow
increased state authority.   I would predict that legislative riders can be
prevented, but it will be very difficult to avoid some kind of increases
(beyond mere adjustments for inflation) in the OPS budget and user fees.

The reauthorization will indeed receive attention in 2000, but our advocacy
efforts will clearly need to be focused on the appropriations process, in
order to minimize the impact on interstate pipeline user fees and prevent
other harmful mandates.

We will continue to work with key members of the authorizing and
appropriations committees to ensure that the interstate natural gas
perspective is clearly heard and, if possible, we avoid being dragged down in
attempts to impose more strict regulation on liquids and LDCs.

Please let me know if you have questions or require additional information.
Thank you.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/03/2000 05:53
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/03/2000 05:32 PM
To: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tosha Henderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carl
Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: GenPower term sheet

Here's the draft term sheet for GenPower.

Please holler if you have any comments.

Kay


thats cute, she just sent me a message reminding me its your bday

-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: FW: Get Busy - from Sheetal

look at this card sheetal send me.  it is so funny!

-----Original Message-----
From: Patel, Sheetal
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: Get Busy - from Sheetal

Hello! Sheetal has just sent you a greeting card from Bluemountain.com.

You can pick up your personal message here:

http://www7.bluemountain.com/cards/boxg227542p2/6fccgx43xv466r.html

Your card will be available for the next 90 days.

This service is 100% FREE! :) Have a good day and have fun!

________________________________________________________________________
Accessing your card indicates agreement with Blue Mountain's Website Rules:
http://www.bluemountain.com/home/WebsiteRules.html

Send FREE Blue Mountain cards to friends and family (and attach gifts too!)
http://www.bluemountain.com


Are we missing one.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, March 13, 2001 9:19 PM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject:	Organizational Changes

We regret to announce that with the reduced emphasis on developing large infrastructure projects in certain countries, a number of individuals have elected to leave Enron.  Diomedes Christodoulou, formerly Chief Commercial Officer of Enron Broadband Services, James Bannantine, formerly CEO of Enron South America, and Sanjay Bhatnagar, formerly CEO of Enron Broadband Services for the Middle East and Asia, have elected to leave Enron to pursue other opportunities.  Diomedes, Jim and Sanjay built and led strong and talented teams at Enron.  We wish all of these individuals the very best in their new endeavors.


What is your offer on marcus robinson?


Based on the recent activities both at FERC (draft order) and at the CPUC
(undercollections/investigations), attached is a draft strategy to develop
a concensus position with as many parties as possible going into the next
legislative session, which begins in January 2001.  There are rumors that
the Governor may call for a special session, which would expedite the
treatment of energy issues.  Please provide any comments/concerns on this
approach asap.

Because of the undercollections the utilities that accumulated by virtue of
the rate cap for SCE and PG&E and the high summer prices, there is a strong
move by the utilities to end the rate freeze as expeditiously as possible.
However, ending the rate freeze early has serious implications for EES's
book of business in addition to the potential to expose consumers to rate
shock, a la San Diego, if the rate cap is removed prior to next summer.

In conversations with various organizations (WPTF, ARM, IEP, TURN), and
internally (Roger Yang), there may be fertile ground for negotiating a
settlement that could be supported by the aforementioned organizations,
provide utility some hope of recovery of their undercollected costs,
continue stabilized rates for small consumers through forward contracting,
providing opportunities for ENA, and defining the utilities role as serving
only residential and small commercial customers, creating marketing
opportunities for larger customers and marketers.

The components of a settlement would need to address:

1.   Rate Freeze Duration/Value of Hydro
2.   Undercollection Treatment
3.   Utility Procurement and Pricing/Default Provider

The proposal would be as follows:

1.   Maintain existing rate freeze through transition period (either
12/31/01 or 3/31/02).

a.      This gives the utilities a reasonable opportunity to mitigate
undercollection in TRA through valuation of hydro, and generation
revenues from the hydro and nuclear facilities.  It also gives the
utility time to structure its portfolio for serving its default
customers-forward contract.

b.      Maintains rate stability for consumers through tight summer
supply periods.

c.      Continues CPUC deliberative valuation of remaining generation
assets, including hydro.  CPUC recently ordered that supplemental
testimony could be filed on December 5 to adjust values to reflect
recent market events.  We think that the rate freeze cannot end without
a valuation of the assets, which is required by December 31, 2001.  This
could be a very significant mitigation piece.

2.   Provide an Equitable Outcome of the Undercollected Balance

a.      While the UDCs believe they can retro-actively effect an end to
the rate freeze, and receive full recovery of any uncollected power
purchase costs, TURN has filed saying that these power purchase costs
should be treated as a transition cost and the utilities should be given
the opportunity to recover those costs during the transition period with
the same risk exposure they have always had.  Anything still in the
account as of 12/31/01 is shareholder risk.

b.      There may be a nice middle ground here.  I think there are some
legal issues with TURN's proposal about treating current unrecovered
electricity costs as "stranded" costs.  However, there is merit to say,
let's get to the end of the transition period and net the
overcollections in the transition cost balancing account (TCBA) against
the undercollected transition revenue account (TRA).  Both SCE and PG&E
have been recording revenues from hydo, nukes, PPAs and QFs.  These
revenues, in addition to the remaining asset valuations, will provide a
substantial offset to the undercollected revenue balance.

c.      In addition, there may be additional merit to some sharing of
any remaining undercollected balance, after netting the two accounts,
between ratepayers and shareholders.  An argument can be made that the
utilities were over-exposed to the market volatility due to the lack of
forward contracting.  (Others may say that the utilities should be
responsible for the run-up in gas prices and ERCs and that ratepayers be
responsible for the balance.  Another way, may be to look at allowing
recovery of "above-cost" prices for period from June 14-Oct 2.  This
presumes that the Commission will not try to pursue disgorging profits
from marketers/generators.)  This amount could be amortized over a
several year period (3-5 years) beginning 2002.  While the sharing may
not be critical to Enron, it will be a big negotiating point between
ratepayer advocates and the utilities.

3.   Clearer definition of utilities' procurement role

a.      Define utility's roles as procurer for residential and small
commercial customers at a levelized price for fixed period of time (3-5
years).  This provides clarity to the utility on for whom they should
contract.  It will also alleviate claims about future stranded costs
when/if default role changes.

b.      Allow procurement flexibility on meeting that responsibility.
Reasonableness will be an issue.  Need to determine if we want to
propose anything or nothing.

c.      Provide only POLR service to industrial customers (flow through
of a spot market price plus retail adders).

d.      At the end of the default transition period, begin the process
of alternative default providers.

4.   Regulatory Process
|----------+------------+-----------+-----------+-------------|
| Hydro    | OII Markets| PG&E/SCE  | OII       | QF          |
|          | Whole/Retai| Emergency | Broader   | Restructurin|
|          | l          | Motions   |           | g           |
|----------+------------+-----------+-----------+-------------|
| Test.    | Subpoenas  | Comments  | Open 12/21| Ongoing     |
| 12/5     |            | 11/9;Reply|           |             |
|          |            | 11/17     |           |             |
|----------+------------+-----------+-----------+-------------|
|          |            | Likely to | Deal with | Deal w/     |
|          |            | adopt TURN| ending    | clipping    |
|          |            | accounting| rate      | capacity    |
|          |            | proposal  | freeze;   | payments in |
|          |            |           | increasing| SRAC to PX  |
|          |            |           | frozen    | price       |
|          |            |           | rates,    |             |
|          |            |           | etc.      |             |
|----------+------------+-----------+-----------+-------------|
| Final    | ?          | Decision  | Unknown,  |             |
| Dec. 3Q01|            | by 12/21  | possibly  |             |
|          |            |           | 2-3Q01    |             |
|----------+------------+-----------+-----------+-------------|


yes

Ina Rangel
04/23/2001 05:04 PM
To:	John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Power Group

John,

Have you cleared everything with Presto about having to move over one row to make room for Fred's group?

-Ina


F.U.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just kidding.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 6:46 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Gay, Randall L.; Heu, Mog; Holst, Keith; Huang, Jason; Kuykendall, Tori; Lenhart, Matthew; Lisk, Daniel; Reitmeyer, Jay; Sanchez, Monique; Scott, Susan M.; Smith, Matt; South, Steven P.; Sullivan, Patti; Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry; Wolfe, Jason
Subject:	Work Hours

Dear West,

We talked briefly on Monday about our commitment to a full work day at Enron.  If you are in the office, then please be prepared to contribute to the group for a full day.  Our schedule now calls for critical communication in the afternoons.  We need to know that each employee will be here every day to create the consistency needed to outperform the rest of the market.

We want to remain as flexible as possible with all traders when it comes to an emergency, but remember that you have a commitment to Enron to contribute a full work day.

Please organize your vacation on the west desk calendar with Ina and coordinate any early afternoon departures with Ina and myself.  Also, prepare to have your markets covered when you leave the office early.

Sincerely,

Mike


Gerald,

Any ideas on this?  They are refusing to post margin to Enron?

thanks
brant

---------------------- Forwarded by Brant Reves/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001 10:17
AM ---------------------------

Brant Reves
01/03/2001 08:01 AM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hess Guaranty

I would have just filled this in, but I wanted to make sure their are no
other matters that need further attention.  Let me know when this is ready.
thanks for your help.

Notice Information:

Hess Energy Trading Company
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Att:  Dana Dellacona

Brant.

To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hess Guaranty

Brant,  Attached is a clean and redlined guaranty with the changes we agreed
upon.  We still need Hess' address for the notice section.  Sorry about the
delay.


Please see attached for review and comment. I did not know if it should be
you or Cheryl.  Thanks.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 10:35 AM -----

	Joseph Marovich <Joseph.Marovich@morganstanley.com>
	05/11/2001 10:25 AM
	Please respond to Joseph.Marovich

		 To: mary.cook@enron.com
		 cc: "tom.doukas" <tom.doukas@enron.com>
		 Subject: [Fwd: Journal Letter]

Hi Mary,
Per our conversation, please find attached the document needed for
transfer.
Regards,
Joe

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Journal Letter
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 11:17:18 -0400
From: Anthony Capolongo <A.Capolongo@morganstanley.com>
Reply-To: A.Capolongo@morganstanley.com
Organization: Morgan Stanley
To: Joseph Marovich <Joseph.Marovich@morganstanley.com>

Joe:

Please forward the attached journal letter to Enron for signature. There
is a second page for signatures that came from Scott Rockoff in a
compliance e-mail.

Anthony
 - Enron.doc


Give me a C
    Give me an N
 Give me an R
 Give me an S

What do you have?  A Quarter!


Vince, I want to congratulate you on your promotion to Managing Director!  As
I scanned the list of people who were promoted, I was so pleased to see your
name on the list.  As large as Enron is, it is refreshing to see people like
you with incredible skill and talent  receive deserving promotions.  I have
certainly enjoyed working with you and the R&D team over the past year and
look forward to a successful 2000 as we break new ground for ET&S.  Kim.


This note is to acknowledge that both of the Peabody entities that currently
trade on EOL (Peabody CoalSales and Peabody COALTRADE, Inc.) have been taken
down to zero threshold for all products.  In addition, they will no longer
have viewing rights either until this dispute is resolved.  Thanks.

Walter

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 02/22/2001 09:41 AM
To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Peabody Coal Sales

Per Wayne Gresham, a lawyer in the coal group, we are having a substantial
payment dispute with the referenced counterparty, and George McClellan, the
business person (and a Managing Director), would like to shut them down
immediately for all trading (which appears to be coal and emissions), offline
and online, until this payment dispute is resolved.


thx. kb.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wolfe, Jason
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:44 PM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	RE: Rotations to date:

Karen,

I reported to Jeff Gossett, who was the West desk lead until he was promoted to director over gas risk mgmt last year.
From that point I reported to Darron Giron, who is the current West desk lead.

Jason
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:30 PM
To:	Wolfe, Jason
Subject:	RE: Rotations to date:

Hi Jason,

can you let me know who you reported to in West Risk?

Thanks,Karen.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wolfe, Jason
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	RE: Rotations to date:

Karen,
I worked in ENA West Risk from July 2000 until March 1, 2001, when I began West Logistics. Risk was counted as my first
rotation. Scheduling is my second.
Jason

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 1:46 PM
To:	Ames, Chuck; Bajwa, Bilal; Ballato, Russell; Gim, Steve; Heu, Mog; Padron, Juan; Pimenov, Vladi; Plachy, Denver; Schiavone, Paul; Shim, Elizabeth; Smith, Matt; Wagner, Joseph; Wolfe, Jason; Yawapongsiri, Virawan
Cc:	Engler, Adrianne
Subject:	Rotations to date:

All,

Thank you all for supplying details on your Trading Track rotation earlier.  I would however like for you to provide me with details of your previous rotations within the A&A program at Enron in the following format:

1.	Rotation (i.e. S/E Fundamentals)
2.	Business Unit (ENA/EGM etc)
3.	Duration (Month/year)
4.	Supervisor

I would be greatful if you could provide this as soon as possible.

Kind regards,

Karen.
x54667


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000 03:31
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Beth Miertschin                           09/29/2000 02:31 PM

To: Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Steinbrueck/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry
Schnapper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Katie Stowers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole
Alvino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell T Kelley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vanderbilt presentation

Open Presentation
Monday, October 2nd - 6:00 PM
Alumni Hall, room 203

Please meet in the lobby of the hotel at 5:15 PM or at the room by 5:30 PM so
we can set up and finalize the game plan.
After the presentation we are going to have a dinner for targeted candidates
and also a reception for the people who came to the presentation.  You will
be informed about where you need to participate on Monday; for now just keep
the time open.

Hotel rooms: Lowe's Vanderbilt Plaza Hotel - 615-320-1700
Nicole Alvino - #6953024
Brian Steinbrueck - #7964648
Katie Stowers - #9216151
Beth Miertschin - #415172
Rusty Kelley - #414434

Thank you for helping out!  Please let me know if you need anything else or
have questions.
Beth Miertschin


Kate,
I will not have time today.  Perhaps it can wait till tomorrow.
Thanks,
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Symes, Kate
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	Cuts Procedure - DON'T FORGET

I know you're busy today, but I don't want to forget to start compiling a reference manual for handling cuts. I can put something together for you to look over and add to, or I'll wait until you have a moment to put something together. Just a reminder.

Kate


I heard they closed the schools because of too much snow!  What's it look
like?


preciate the note migo.

I had a blast, good to just laugh...about what, who knows.

I had to dash out this morning, so I didn't eat.  But, Karen just left me
voice mail saying the pie was soooo goooood.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:07 AM
To: ttt@cpuc.ca.gov
Subject:

Thanks for coming over last night.  Very fun.  Great to see you.  Really
glad you guys joined in.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041103.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  34.66 / Final:  20.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: TOSCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  47.00 / Final:  46.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_8000
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:   8.00 / Final:   7.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:   0.43 / Final:   0.29)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:   4.65 / Final:   3.29)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  42.56 / Final:  29.46)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Attached please find a sheet of pro and con statements.

 <<Statements.doc>>

 - Statements.doc


Thanks for the update.

From: John Hardy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/10/2001 09:48 AM
To: Rebecca McDonald/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Ben Glisan@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: USG overtures on Dabhol

Rebecca
 At a meeting yesterday at OPIC on Trakya, another of our problem projects,
Dabhol was raised.  A representative from the White House transition team
joined the conversation.  I was asked the terms under which we were prepared
to negotiate and I told them at a minimum upon a commitment by the Indian
authorities to serious negotiations which would include full compliance with
the terms of the contracts and progress in the reform of the MSEB.  I made
clear that we do not see the Godbole Committee as the basis for such a
discussion.
 I think the USG wants to be on record politically encouraging the Indian
Govt. to engage in discussions all parties consider to be meaningful in hopes
of working things out before it is too late, even while through OPIC and EXIM
it is supporting the move towards PNT.  The administration may be concerned
that without such a diplomatic overture on its part it could be concluded
that the USG has politically taken a position on the project.
 In Trakya, for example, the USG has been quite proactive in pressing the
Turkish govt on the payments issue and even in discussing the payment
concerns with the IMF so that the payments issues for the BOTs (two of the
four in Turkey are US sponsored) are taken into account as the IMF program
moves forward.
 So I anticipate that the USG will shortly be meeting with the Indian
ambassador here and the US Charge in Delhiwill likely be directed to make the
rounds and meet with senior government officals on the project.
 I wanted you to be aware of this; also any guidance you can provide would be
helpful.  Thanks John


Dear Body Shop Member:

During the UBS/Enron transition your Body Shop membership will continue without interruption.  We are working with UBS and Enron to transition payroll deductions and continue exterior door access to the Body Shop.

While we are finalizing these changes please continue your Body Shop membership.

Thank you,
The Body Shop


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Richard Toubia" <richard.toubia@truequote.com <mailto:richard.toubia@truequote.com>>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Richard+20Toubia+22+20+3Crichard+2Etoubia+40truequote+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Richard+20Toubia+22+20+3Crichard+2Etoubia+40truequote+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>
Sent:	Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:48 AM
To:	pallen@enron.com <mailto:pallen@enron.com>
Subject:	Party

Phillip:

Here is info about the party I am having.  It's has been a long time I
haven't seen you, so try to come (I know you usually do not).  Try to bring
Hunty and some other old timers.  Don't worry about the fact that it is to
celebrate the "Launching of True Quote and EOL link", it was supposed to
take place on June 9th, but we got flooded out!  I am inviting bunch of
friends and few colleagues and some of the EOL people I work with.

My phone at work is 713 622 5243

Richard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You are cordially invited to a party at my house to celebrate True Quote's
true launch and the completed integration with EnronOnline.  But these are
just excuses!.
We all had too many Mylanta moments and we need to drink it up.

Time:  Saturday JULY 14, 2001 at 8:00 PM
Place:  415 W 22 Street in the Heights (on 22nd Street between Shepherd and
Yale).
Phone: (713) 862-8268
Dress Code: As long as you don't get arrested for Public Indecency
Parking: on 22nd Street and in a parking lot at corner of 22nd and Ashland
Light food and drinks.

Map is enclosed for directions.

Hope you can join us

 - Picture


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000082182&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000082182
Request Create Date : 2/4/02 9:06:52 AM
Requested For       : bryan.delahoussaye@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production Central Edit Deal Compliance
Resource Type       : Applications


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/12/2000 08:41 AM ---------------------------

Shari Stack@ECT
08/10/99 03:16 PM
To: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Australia

as discussed
---------------------- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 08/10/99 03:16 PM
---------------------------

David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/10/99 02:55 AM
To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Australia

Shari see attached. Paul Quilkey is going to arrange a phone hook up to see
if we can finalise this matter.

Shari Stack@ECT
05/08/99 04:12
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott.Farrell@msj.com.au
cc:

Subject: Financial Trading in Australia

We met with Gary Hickerson and Paul Quilkey late last week and explained our
findings. It now appears that whilst the primary purpose for transacting is
to hedge existing risks (as explained in my memo of 7/29), Gary wants to be
able to enter into Transactions (also as defined in my memo) - particularly
the purchase and sale of equities - on a more proprietary/speculative basis.

Therefore, he has asked that we look into what it would take for us to obtain
a Securities Dealer's License. I would be grateful if you could please
prepare a short memo and set forth what the capital requirements, reporting
requirements, monitoring, experience and education level of staff,
performance bond, exact level of "surplus liquid funds", length of time for
application to be processed, ongoing obligations, etc... would realistically
be.

I know these topics were generally addressed in Scott's fax of July 14th but
I would be grateful if one of you could please condense this and give us
specifics that we can present to Gary. Please call me if you want to discuss.

Many thanks,

Shari


We agree
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities on
02/12/2001
11:29 AM ---------------------------

kponton@duke-energy.com on 02/12/2001 11:02:00 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU
cc:
Subject:  WEEKEND NOMS/ACTUAL FLOW

DATE           NOM            ACTUAL  FLOW

2/09/01             46,667               48,029

2/10/01             40,000               41,315

2/11/01             55,833               56,895

VOLUMES ARE IN MMBTU'S


You narratives aren't too long, I'm just giving you some grief!


MIchael:

I will be over for the ISDA board meeting on January 25 and 26.  With the
launch of the credit derivatives business, I think it would be a good time to
do a brief Securities Law/Chinese Wall seminar relating to the credit
business.  I would propose to review the rules we have instituted in NA and
particular issues in the European market.  My preference on timing is in the
morning on the 26th, and second, in the afternoon on the 25th.  Please give
your thoughts on this.  Take care.

Mark


i'm flexible, but i'm guessing it will be more crowded then.  y?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:09 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE:

Not around 12:30 then?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:08 AM
To: JHawker@petersco.com
Subject: RE:

probly around 2 or after work around 4:30.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:02 AM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:

   What time do you think you will be going to the gym today?
   Jai Hawker
   Peters & Co. Limited
   (403) 261-2259

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Jim -- Attached is are several examples of the implementation of the
SERC/Enron/TVA agreement.  Dick will call you.

Use LAUNCH to view.  Thank you.  Christi Nicolay  713-853-7007


FYI.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 6:07 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; 'sgovenar@govadv.com'; 'hgovenar@govadv.com';
'ken@kdscommunications.com'; 'bhansen@lhom.com'; Steffes, James D.;
Kingerski, Harry; Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Denne, Karen
Subject: FW: AReM release

ARM press release on the filing at the Commission pointing out the legal errors in the Decision to suspend DA

-----Original Message-----
From: Fairchild, Tracy [mailto:tracy.fairchild@edelman.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:31 PM
To: 'arem@electric.com'; 'nplotkin@rcsis.com';
'douglass@energyattorney.com'
Cc: Manuel, Erica; Allen, Stevan
Subject: FW: AReM release

AReMers,

This is the release that went to the media today.

 <<9-28Rehearing Release.doc>>


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/20/2001>, published as of 11/20/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Kim:

I didn't save the email verison of the "corrections to published prices" so I'll state the changes below and you can revise:

(1)  You will need two different versions:  one for GTC's and the other for ISDA confirmations

(2)  Don't capitalize the word "party" in either version

(3)  Use the capitalized term "Interest Rate" for the GTC version

(4)  Use the capitalized term "Applicable Rate" for the ISDA version

When I hear back from Kim T., we can finalize the rounding convention for online and offline confirmations.

Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hundl, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 5:23 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: New Confirm Template

Yes, all templates should include language covering corrections to published prices.  On October 9th, I forwarded an email to you requesting your review of that language that we received from Brent Hendry.  I had not heard back yet, but was planning to add that to our templates after I got your approval.  If you would like that email re-sent, please let me know.
The only rounding language that I am aware of, is in the second to last paragraph of this template.
Please let me know what changes are necessary.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October  22, 2001 4:59 PM
To:	Hundl, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: New Confirm Template

Kim:

A very general question:  shouldn't all of the financial power templates provide for corrections to published prices and rounding to four places for commodities quoted in MMBtus?  Your template does not contain either of these.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hundl, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:51 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Hendry, Brent
Cc:	Murphy, Melissa Ann
Subject:	New Confirm Template

Per our discussion this morning I have attached the new form for our confirms.  Please let me know if further changes are necessary.
 << File: sampledoc.doc >>
Thank you for your help!
Kimberly Hundl x31647


I don't know a thing about this deal!  I am expecting Marcus to call me this
morning for further explanation.  Forgive my ignorance, but what is a CACS?
Thanks.  Sara

	Treasa Kirby
	11/14/2000 08:37 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Prepaid swap

Sara,
Do we need to complete a CACS form for this deal and if so does it need to be
signed off by London or Houston as ENA are executing the deal ?

Regards
---------------------- Forwarded by Treasa Kirby/LON/ECT on 14/11/2000 14:39
---------------------------

carrd2@tdcibg.com on 09/11/2000 19:06:35
To: tkirby@enron.com
cc: Cori_Novellino@TDBANK-US.tdsecurities.com,
Graeme_Francis@TDBANK-UK.tdsecurities.com

Subject: Prepaid swap

At the request of Graeme Francis in our London office, attached please find a
copy of the ISDA Master Agreement b/w Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. (I
believe this is now Enron North America??) and Toronto Dominion (Texas), Inc.

Regards,
Dan Carr
(416) 983-9473

(See attached file: Enron.doc)

 - Enron.doc


All:

Attached you will find a list that reflects your seat assignments for Business Continuity Planning (BCP).  These seats are located on the 30th and 31st Floors of Enron Center North (ECN).  As previously communicated, you will report to these designated seats in the event of an outage in ECS.

The exception to this is as follows:
If your seat assignment is located on the 31st Floor, you will report to your original location that you occupied prior to your move into ECS.  This will hold true until the Monday after Thanksgiving, as we will have the 31st floor seats set up at that time.

Testing:
Once you have moved to ECS, if you would like to test your BCP location, you will be able to test your seat for functionality every Thursday from 3-6pm.  Testing is not required, but is highly recommended.

If anyone has any questions or concerns about these procedures, please feel free to contact me at any time.

Regards,

Stephen R. Harrington
Technical Project Manager, ECS Project
Enron Net Works, LLC
w:  713-853-7619
p:  877-651-7361
c:  713-444-7279
stephen.harrington@enron.com


Stacey!

ACN Energy Inc. is currently guaranteed by its parent American Communications Network, Inc., however Aquila Inc., currently has a business relationship with this counterparty and is willing to provide a guaranty in its favor.

Kindly review the attached guaranty language and forward to Elden Condie at the listed email address for execution.  The amount of guarantee we will like to have is $1.5MM.  Kindly cc me on your comments.

Thanks
Rudwell
53596.

-----Original Message-----
From: Elden Condie [mailto:Elden.Condie@ACNENERGY.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Johnson, Rudwell
Subject: Credit Vehicle

Rudwell,
Per our telcon, the attached document is the Corporate Guarantee that Aquila Inc. is offering on behalf of ACN Energy to provide credit support.  We propose replacing our parental guarantee from ACN Inc. with the Aquila guarantee.  This will allow us to have a larger credit line and increase our ability to purchase supplies from Enron.  Thank you for your review.

Elden Condie
(703) 744-8979

<<Aquila Guarantee .doc>>


A preliminary time line for the Summer 2001 Reconfiguration
Auctions of TCCs has been established by the NYISO.  This
time line will be posted on the NYISO web-site tomorrow.

Attached for your convenience is a copy of the time line.

(See attached file: Reconfiguration_timeline_Summer-2001.PDF)

 - Reconfiguration_timeline_Summer-2001.PDF


Please note the following changes:
Calpine Power Services Company (Calpine)
Merged into
Calpine Energy Services, LP (Calpineene)
Contacts are being set up by Global Counterparty and Calpine Power Services
will be inactivated when this is completed.  Please book new deals to Calpine
Energy Services, LP


Packet is on it's way by fed ex.  Maureen will call the organizers.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 6:42 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:	Meeting in Portland

Send me the details, but it looks a.o.k. for me on the 19th.


eThink stuff!  Get your red hot eThink stuff!  You know you want to be one of
the cool kids; go to the Enron Signature Shop and order your eThink stuff
today.  Shirts, gadgets, hats and more.  We've even got gel mouse pads.
Don't know what those are?  Go find out!  Get your eThink stuff!

Tuesday, January 30 at 10:00 am Houston time, join Carrie Robert on eSpeak.
Carrie is the manager of experienceEnron, a powerful customer briefing
program.  Carrie will be available to answer your questions about the program
in an "open-mike" forum.

We've added more tips and techniques to help you do your job!  Learn about
postmortems and metaphors in Good Sense at the ThinkBank.

Call for quotes!  How would you like to be featured on the front page of the
ThinkBank or eMeet?  As you may have noticed, we put a new quote on the cover
of the ThinkBank and eMeet each month.  We've been sticking to the classics
so far, but we've decided to look in our own backyard for quotes in 2001.
Send an original quote to ethink@enron.com and you could be famous!

ethink.enron.com


Back at cha!

"Lisa Clarke" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 08/28/2000 01:39:41 PM
To: Kay Mann <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Please read and send back

I usually stay away from spam, but I thought this was nice.
>  > > >>
>  > > >> > > > > > I said a prayer for you just now.....
>  > > >> > > > > > When you receive this e-mail just
>  > > >> > > > > > recite the following prayer. That's all you have to
>  > > >> > > > > > do.
>  > > >> > > > > > There is nothing attached.
>  > > >> > > > > > This is the power of prayer at work. Just send
>  > > >> > > > > > this to (4) people and see what happens on the
>  > > >> > > > > > fourth  day.
>  > > >> > > > > > Do not break this, please. There is no cost, but
>  > > >> > > > > > lots of rewards.
>  > > >> > > > > > Let's continue to pray for one another.
>  > > >> > > > > >
>  > > >> > > > > > PRAYER:
>  > > >> > > > > > May today there be peace within you.
>  > > >> > > > > > May you trust God that you are exactly where
>  > > >> > > > > > you are meant to be.
>  > > >> > > > > > May you not forget the infinite possibilities
>  > > >> > > > > > that are born of faith. May you use those gifts
>  > > >> > > > > > that you have received, and pass on the love that has
>  > > >> > > > > > been given to you. May you be content knowing that
>  > > >> > > > > > you are a child of God. Let His presence settle
>  > > >> > > > > > into your bones, and allow your soul the freedom to
>  > > >> > > > > > sing, dance, and to bask in the sun. It is there for
>  > > >> > > > > > each and every one of you.
>  > > >> > > > > >
>  > > >> > > > > > Send this to (4) or more people and
>  > > >> > > > > > witness the awesome power of  prayer
>  > > >>
>
>


Testing.  Testing.  This is a test of the Waldrop email systems.  This is
only a test.  If this were a real email, there would be a much more
meaningful and heartfelt message contained herein.

	"Waldrop, Barbara (CBI-Houston)" <Barbara.Waldrop@cox.com>
	02/23/2001 11:27 AM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: See

See, I do work for Cox!

Barbara Waldrop
Business Manager
Cox Radio-Houston
1990 Post Oak Blvd, Ste 2300
Houston, TX? 77056
barbara.waldrop@cox.com
713-963-1230
713-622-6708 (fax)


what are you trying to show me?

this just sends me to the ap website

Brian Hoskins
08/25/2000 11:34 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://wire.ap.org/?FRONTID=MCOLBASKETBALL


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
09:50 AM ---------------------------

Cchao@cook-inlet.com on 04/12/2001 08:44:48 AM
To: matthew.lenhart@enron.com, steve.south@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Staples Center & Houston Astros

Hey boys,

It looks like we got tickets to the Astros baseball games. If you guys are
interested, let me know and I will reserve it for you. Please pass this
along to Frank for me.

Steve - you can take your dozen kids to the game:)

Have a great Easter weekend!

> HOUSTON ASTRO TICKETS at Enron Field:
> http://astros.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/hou/ballpark/hou_ballpark_seating.jsp
>
> * 25-Apr-01 Astros  Braves  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 27-Apr-01 Astros  Marlins  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 20-May-01 Astros  Reds  1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 20-May-01 Astros  Reds  1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 3-Jul-01 Astros  Diamondbacks 7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 3-Jul-01 Astros  Diamondbacks 7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 17-Jul-01 Astros  Indians  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 17-Jul-01 Astros  Indians  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 1-Aug-01 Astros  Mets  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 2-Aug-01 Astros  Mets  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 16-Aug-01 Astros  Pirates    4
> Sec. 112 (3rd Base)
> * 18-Aug-01 Astros  Pirates  7:05 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 7-Sep-01 Astros  Brewers    4
> Sec. 112 (3rd Base)
> * 9-Sep-01 Astros  Brewers  1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
> * 23-Sep-01 Astros  Cubs  1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 112 (3rd Base)
> * 25-Sep-01 Astros  Cardinals 1:35 PM 4 Sec.
> 118 (Dugout/Home Plate)
>
Cindy


excellent.

	Michelle Hicks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/26/2000 03:17 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

I was going to get red beans and rice from Treebeards for lunch tomorrow.
Sound okay?

	Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	10/26/00 03:11 PM

		 To: Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

no, no, no.  thank YOU!

	Michelle Hicks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/26/2000 03:10 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

Cool.  See you tomorrow.  We have conference room EB 4598A at 12:00 noon.
Thanks, Michelle

	Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	10/26/00 02:21 PM

		 To: Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

12 it is.  i'll need to leave at 1 pm to catch my plane.  we should be able
to get things done in an hour.

Best,
Jeff

	Michelle Hicks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/26/2000 02:02 PM

		 To: Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

----- Forwarded by Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications on 10/26/00 02:07 PM
-----

	JoAnne Garner
	10/26/00 01:42 PM

		 To: Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Melissa Loyd/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting

I have reserved 4598A for you guys tomorrow from 12 - 2.  Thanks.

Joanne Garner
713 853 3237


When you ask a question you usually have heard a rumor.  What did you hear?

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/06/2001 03:35 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: New York Hotel

The New York Hilton sounds good and the location is good.  We are paying for
this, so we don't want to spend a fortune.  I also emailed Nellie in
Klauberg's office to see if she had any recommendations/connections.  You
know I do make sure his bills get paid!!!!!!!

Are you going to be doing business on your vacation days because if you are,
I'm not going to charge you.  I just don't think that's right.  Have you guys
had any new additions to your group?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 03:30 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: sheila.tweed@enron.com@ECT, dan.lyons@enron.com@ECT
		 Subject: Re: New York Hotel

Never stayed there.  My current favorite is the Omni, which is in one of may
favorite locations. It has a little deli like shop across the street, where I
can buy reasonably priced bagels, cokes, etc.  Last year I also stayed at the
Marriott Marquis (BIG, right on Times Square) and the Mark (too snooty).  I
stayed two other places I didn't like, but the names escape me.

I've seen some other smaller hotels which look nice, and if I check a map I
might remember the names.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/06/2001 12:37 PM
To: sheila.tweed@enron.com, dan.lyons@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: New York Hotel

What do you guys know about the Mayflower.  We are looking for a hotel in New
York at Christmas.
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2001 12:36 PM -----

	"Doherty, Ric" <Ric.Doherty@COMPAQ.com>
	06/06/2001 12:33 PM

		 To: "Suzanne Adams Doherty (E-mail)" <Suzanne.Adams@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: New York Hotel

Do any of your people know anything about this place....it is where Pam and
Scott stayed and really liked it...recommended by Brysch

http://www.mayflowerhotel.com/welcome.htm

Thanks,

Ric Doherty
(281) 514-7624 - office
(800) 920-8171 - pager
ric.doherty@compaq.com
ricdoherty@att.net


Question is whether DWR steps up and/or ISO's creditors take further pain.
Link to the decision below:

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "BENNETT YOUNG" <BYOUNG@LLGM.COM>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22BENNETT+20YOUNG+22+20+3CBYOUNG+40LLGM+2ECOM+3E+40ENRON@E
NRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; CARL EKLUND; JOHN KLAUBERG
Subject: AP3086-PrelimInjunc6-26.pdf

I enclose Judge Montali's decison in the ISO litigation.  Based on the ISO's
concessions at the hearing and the FERC's creditworthiness requirements, the
Judge enjoined ISO from filing an administrative claim for post-petition
power purchases made by it on behalf of PG&E.

http://www.canb.uscourts.gov/canb/Documents.nsf/bf0c3519af9731c88825671d006664
79/4799756092ca99bf88256a4a00045971/$FILE/AP3086-PrelimInjunc6-26.pdf

Bennett G. Young
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 951-1167
byoung@llgm.com

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================
 - AP3086-P.url


You goated me into it,

Here goes

400/per

Minn -8
New Orleans -10
Denver -3
Denver-KC under 48
Jack -10
Clev +16
Chic +6 1/2
Indi-Mia under 42
Balt -15

John I would like to sit with you a couple days this week if you'll let me.  I'm very serious about covering you when your out in January.  I would like to get a sense of what its like dealing with your EOL madness.  Let me know.

Lavo


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/13/2000
08:11 AM ---------------------------
From: Vicki Sharp@EES on 09/12/2000 09:09 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: BG&E

---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 09/12/2000 09:09
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Vicki Sharp                           09/12/2000 09:07 AM
	Phone No: 713 853-7413

To: Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, John Carr/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Porter/HOU/EES@EES,
Laren Dean Tarbet/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr,
Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Rick Shapiro, Steve Kean
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman,
Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Lou Pai, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: BG&E

See below.  VEPCO  intends to challenge the USMDW privatization.  More
details to come.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 09/12/2000 09:04
AM ---------------------------

Robert C Williams@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/11/2000 04:39 PM
To: Vicki Sharp@EES, Andrew Ralston/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: BG&E

I have scheduled a meeting with Larry Adams, the Asst. U.S. Attorney, and
Doug Kornreich, the Corps lawyer, for Wednesday at 10:30 AM.  Doug tells me
that VEPCO has told him that it plans to file a challenge to the GAO's
decision in the Court of Federal Claims this week.  I have also spoken to
Andy Holloman;  we will call him from the Venable office for a "download" on
the Colorado case.

Ideas on D.C. counsel?  V&E or Venable are the logical choices;  offhand I
would propose V&E.


Brenda

 Can you send me your address in College Station.

Phillip


Deal is rebooked

Susan

+

To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal # nw3215

Please rebook to Grupo Calidra SA de CV.

Thanks
Lesli


-----Original Message-----
From: Hanagriff, Richard
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Ward, Linda; Carpenter, Nancy; Mulligan, Amy; Schoolcraft, Darrell;
McEvoy, Christine; Minter, Tracy; Hernandez, Bert
Subject: FW: Downsizing

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill60" <bill60@triplecrownsportsbar.com>
To: "ALAN WARD" <alsurvco@flash.net>; "Chuck Tolson"
<vantolson@aol.com>;
"Mark S. Smith" <mssmith7@home.com>; "Kathaleen mike Simich"
<ksimich@flash.net>; "Tom Shackelford" <tom.shackelford@glm.com>; "Hans
Neureiter" <pegleg@awesomenet.net>; "PJ McLellan" <pjMcLellan@aol.com>;
"MIKE/CONNIE MASERA" <CMasera@aol.com>; "Lisa Mannino"
<houstondaisy@hotmail.com>; "Carla Louviere" <louviere@kalsi.com>; "KEN
KEATING" <KKEATING@bsiconsulting.com>; "Joe HAENELT,SR"
<gulfcoast@airmail.net>; "terry laura henry"
<THenry2801@kingwoodcable.NET>;
"karma Hedge" <Hi-Seat@webtv.net>; "Richard Gray"
<richardg@tagsite.com>;
"Gilbert" <RGL2@gateway.net>; "Henry Garcia" <hgonroad@aol.com>; "Steve
Edwards" <hitstickandslide@swbell.net>; "JAMES R CUMMINGS"
<jrc@rver.com>;
"Derrick M Crisp" <derrick_crisp@veritasdgc.com>; "Del Compton"
<delcompton@msn.com>; <CDRBelle1@aol.com>; "Carkjr" <Carkjr@aol.com>;
"DANIEL BOONE" <ibdanlboone@ev1.net>; "Dave Beach" <dmrbeach@ev1.net>;
"Rick
Ashwood" <cowboy1296@aol.com>; "JOHN ANDERSON" <johnand@swbell.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 4:24 PM
Subject: FW: DOWNSIZING
These guys have to have been watching the Enron coverage.


i have talked to him and he is ok
Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com

	Elizabeth Sager
	05/09/2001 04:04 PM

		 To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: PG&E Standstill - Final Draft

Lisa can you let me know if if we should contact Michael or will you be doing
so  any way
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2001 04:03 PM -----

	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/09/2001 03:56 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: PG&E Standstill - Final Draft

I am out of the office until Friday, May 11.  If you need to contact me,
please leave a message at 713 853-3820 or contact  Emy Geraldo @ 713 853-5391
or Pam Metoyer X3-6707.  Thanks.


Busy week while you were gone. Here is what I bought.

11/14-17   15,000/d   $5.83   TCOAP   DJenkins
11/15-20    30,000/d   $6.02   TCOAP   S.Hendrickson
11/17          4,108/d      $5.95   TGP/TCO Broadruncobb  DJ
11/18-20     4,108/d     $5.85    TGP/TCO Broadruncobb  DJ


Got your note.  It's a little premature to forecast now - we will have a
better idea by April 15 - our timeline for completing our look at a revenue
model.  Can we delay until then?  We do have a monthly fee of $16,000 that we
are receiving from Bridgeline that, while small, you could include in our
revenue line to date.  I am not sure why it is not showing up as income.
Probably because we have been considered a cost center to date.  I suspect
that the income is simply being recorded as an offset to one of our cost
centers.  By copy of this memo to Brian Heinrich, could you and he figure out
where that income is and classify it appropriately so that it shows as
revenue?  Since our costs are fully allocated to business units, this should
be pure margin.  Hey, you have to start somewhere!

I have a lunch meeting scheduled with Greg Piper on Friday this week. One of
the items that I want to discuss with him is how we want to treat expenses
that we are incurring while researching the feasibility of this business.  I
don't have an answer for you today on what if any costs will not be allocated
to the business units.  Next week I can give you more info on that.

From: Kerry Roper/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/03/2001 01:55 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Forecast for 2001

Sally,
One of the things that Greg Piper has asked me to do is to take a look at the
rest of the year and get each of the VP's to assess their margins and EBIT
for the remainder of 2001.  For Energy Operations, that is usually very easy
since there has been no revenues, and all of the costs are allocated out, so
there should be zero EBIT if nothing changed.  Given your present direction,
however, you may be generating some margin in 2001.  Do you have a feel for
an amount I can put into our analysis and will 100% of your costs continue to
be billed out or will some be applied to this new activity? I am hoping to
put something together next week, so if you or a designate could let me know
in a few days I would appreciate it.

Kerry Roper (x5-4895)


In obtaining documentation for our power dealtest, we noticed that six of our
twenty chosen deals were desk-to-desk deals.  Therefore, we have selected six
additional deals in which to test.  If these additional deals are also
desk-to-desk deals, please let me know and I will select a replacement deal.
Please provide the applicable documentation (i.e., deal ticket, curve, global
counterparty, confirmation, DCAF printout, New Deals report, contract)
corresponding with your areas of responsibility for the attached deals.

(See attached file: Additional Deal Request.xls)

If you have any questions, please call me at X6-6269.  Thank you for your
help.

Jennifer

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

 - Additional Deal Request.xls


Michelle/Jo Ann, these people do not show up in the HR Data Warehouse (HRGIS or EPC structures) from what we can tell based off the names provided.  If they have identification numbers that we can use, it may help since names can be misspelled easily.  We searched by last name then checked each one for a match on first or middle name.  Let me know if you have any other information.

Kathy

-----Original Message-----
From: Hill, Jo Ann
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:02 AM
To: Schultea, Kathryn
Cc: Cash, Michelle
Subject: FW: Employee List

Kathy -- please see attached file.  For those individuals listed as having no record in SAP, can you please check to see if these people are in either EPC or HRGIS and provide the requested information?
Please return the file to Michelle Cash.
Thanks.
Jo Ann

-----Original Message-----
From: Cash, Michelle
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:34 PM
To: Hill, Jo Ann
Subject: RE: Employee List

Jo Ann,

Could you please coordinate with Kathy to get the answers?

Thanks.

Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Hill, Jo Ann
Sent: Mon 11/12/2001 6:33 PM
To: Cash, Michelle
Cc:
Subject: RE: Employee List

Michelle -- that's why I worded it the way I did.  I only have enterprise access to SAP.  Kathy Schultea would be the person who could query the global system and/or the old EPC system if they were terminated in EPC.

Any other questions, please let me know.
Thanks.
Jo Ann

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Cash, Michelle
Sent:   Monday, November 12, 2001 10:15 AM
To:     Hill, Jo Ann
Subject:        FW: Employee List

Jo Ann, what is the answer?  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From:   kevin.r.kosub@us.andersen.com@ENRON
Sent:   Monday, November 12, 2001 9:56 AM
To:     Cash, Michelle
Cc:     Murray, Julia; Sweet, Twanda
Subject:        Re: Employee List

Thanks for the information, however I have a question for the 14
individuals in which we have "No record in SAP".   Do we know for certain
that these individuals where not employed with Enron , or is it that there
is no record of them in SAP HR.  Would a query out of the HR datawarehouse
tell us more information?

Thanks,
Kevin

                                         To:  Kevin R. Kosub@ANDERSEN WO
                                         cc:  Julia.Murray@enron.com
                  Michelle.Cash@enron.   Date:        11/12/2001 09:22 AM
                  com                     Subject:   Employee List
                  Sent by:
                  Twanda.Sweet@enron.c
                  om
                                         Message Mailed On Behalf Of --->  Twanda.Sweet@enron.com

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
(See attached file: M Cash_Individuals.xls)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
 - M Cash_Individuals.xls << File: M Cash_Individuals.xls >>


Please mark your calendars.  Emory Ireland and Martin Weinstein of Foley &
Lardner will be conducting a presentation regarding the nuts and bolts of
Letters of Credit on Wednesday, May 23, 2001 from 8:45 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. in
EB5C2.  Please RSVP to Carolyn George at ext. 33439 or
carolyn.george@enron.com if you plan to attend.

Thank you,

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


Bob,

He is now in town (he arrived on Monday).  Please call and leave him a
voicemail.  We will meet with you.
Mike

Bob Nimocks <BNimocks@ZeusDevelopment.com> on 04/25/2001 09:16:30 AM
To: "Mike McConnell (E-mail)" <Mike.Mcconnell@enron.com>,
"'Cathy.Phillips@Enron.com'" <Cathy.Phillips@Enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Introduction to Eric Gonzales

Mike,
In the interest of time, I'd like to call Eric Gonzales directly.  Please,
would you make an introduction.  My company description is below.  We've
covered the LNG industry for over ten years and have some ideas that fit with
Enron's trading strategy.
Thanks,
Bob Nimocks
www.zeusdevelopment.com
Founded in 1991, Houston-based Zeus Development Corporation is a research
consultancy and central information clearinghouse for business-related
research, news and information concerning two subjects: natural gas
development and information technology in energy.
Zeus publishes websites and periodicals (newsletters, magazines and annual
reports), provides strategic research services through multi-client and
single-client consulting engagements, and conducts workshops, conferences and
trade exhibits.
Specific areas of coverage in the natural gas development industry include
liquefied natural gas (LNG); Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis, methanol and
dimethyl ether (DME -- collectively GTL); international pipelines;
well-to-wire; ammonia; aluminum smelting; direct iron reduction (DRI);
desalination; fuel cells; and carbon black.
Areas of coverage for energy-industry information technology include
web-based systems for E&P companies; oilfield-service and equipment
suppliers; transportation and transmission companies; refiners, processors
and petrochemical manufacturers; electric power producers; energy services;
and wholesale and retail product, gas and electricity suppliers.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Nimocks
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Mike McConnell (E-mail)
Subject: FW: LNG's Role in North American & Caribbean Gas Supply

Mike,
Know you're extremely busy -- Suzanne tells me positions at rarified heights
are driven by the need for crisis intervention. Members of your LNG team tell
me that Eric Gonzales is coming to Houston to lead Western Hemispheric
activities.  Maybe the three of us could meet for breakfast somewhere close
to your offices.
Let me know a convenient time and date.
Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Nimocks
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Mike McConnell (E-mail)
Subject: LNG's Role in North American & Caribbean Gas Supply

Mike:
Understand LNG continues to be an enigma cloaked in a mystery for Enron.  We
are continuing to expand our coverage and knowledge base of this marketplace,
especially in the Western Hemisphere and would like to meet with you to
discuss our observations and learn more about Enron's desires in this arena.
Also, we have a meeting planned in D.C. in late June, entitled "LNG's Role in
North American & Caribbean Gas Supply."  With the U.S. hunger for gas and El
Paso, AEC and other's announcements of new projects, the meeting should be
constructive, especially with DOE and FERC involvement.  See summary below.
Let me know when you might be available to discuss the LNG marketplace.
We've just completed a white paper, entitled "Atlantic-Basin LNG: A Whirling
Supply/Demand Balance."  You may find our conclusions of interest.
Best regards,
Bob Nimocks
President
Zeus Development Corporation
www.zeusdevelopment.com
2424 Wilcrest Dr., Suite 250
Houston, TX 77042
Direct: 713-952-9529
Main: 888-GR8-DATA (478-3282)
e-mail: bnimocks@zeusdevelopment.com

***********************************
TITLE:  LNG's Role in North American & Caribbean Gas Supply
DATE/LOCATION:  Washington D.C., June 27-29
SUMMARY:  The winter of 2000/2001 confirmed the shift in the United States
from a buyer's to a seller's market. Gas supplies for North America ran short
as demand rose from colder weather, higher electricity demand and shortages
in storage from the previous year.  More and more supply is shifting from the
U.S. Gulf Coast to Western Canada as offshore exploration in the Gulf of
Mexico has proven disappointing.  U.S. demand for power generation is
expected to keep gas demand high through the summer of 2001, siphoning off
gas that would have been destined for storage.
Meanwhile during the long gas bubble of the 1980s, drilling rigs and
experienced field personnel dwindled from thousands to several hundred.  The
current rig count for North American gas exploration and production is near
full capacity at just over 600 rigs, so the industry is constrained on how
quickly it can recover.
The U.S. has not experienced shortages of natural gas like this since the
1970s and early 1980s when it was feared that the nation would run out of gas
in 10 years.  Four LNG import terminals were built to supply natural gas from
North Africa (Algeria).  These terminals are capable of supplying up to 5% of
total U.S. gas consumption (about one trillion cubic feet per year).  Plans
are underway to have all four terminals fully operational by the end of 2002;
however, more are needed.
Conventional wisdom is that no new terminals would be built in the United
States due to EPA laws and local citizen protests to any facility perceived
to be unsightly or dangerous.  Now, El Paso (a company that was burned by
Congress in the 1980s by the ruling that take-or-pay LNG contracts with
Algeria were invalid) is challenging conventional wisdom. They have announced
plans for six new terminals to be built in North America: three in the United
States and three in Mexico.    New LNG plants in Venezuela, Algeria and
Northern Australia might supply these terminals.
Other companies, such as Enron and AEC, have announced plans to build
terminals in the Caribbean to supply gas to independent power production
(IPP) plants ranging from 400 to 1000 megawatts.  Moreover, LNG facilities on
Caribbean Islands close to Florida might export gas or electricity via
undersea pipeline and cable.  Floating offshore LNG terminals may also offer
a means to bring LNG into the United States with less environmental and
community concern.
The June 27-29 conference, entitled "LNG's Role in North American & Caribbean
Gas Supply," will cover the dynamics that are leading to North American gas
supply shortages, how long they are expected to last, and what source of
natural gas are available from conventional sources to meet demand.  The
conference will then focus on opportunities for LNG, including the capacities
and timing of current terminals, the prospects for new mainland and offshore
terminals, and the opportunity for broader terminal networks in the
Caribbean, including those facilities that might supply gas or electricity to
the United States.
* * *


All my Sonat notes.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:39 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Garza, Maria; Dicarlo, Louis; Boyt, Eric
Cc:	Olinger, Kimberly S.; Germany, Chris
Subject:	FW: Sonat Park & Loans and Sale to Sonat

These are my notes on the Sonat Park & Loan.  I have not spoken with any legal counsel representing ENA.

Summary:  Sonat has netted our Parked Gas Balance with our Loaned Gas Balance and filed a motion with the courts to retain the remaining Parked Gas Balance, 92,949 dth per my conversation with Sonat, to offset $879,030.42 ENA owes Sonat for the purchase of gas in October 2001.  According to Sonat, the payment was due November 26, 2001 but ENA did not pay.  Sonat's motion is set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th.

ENA recognizes a balance of 197,537 dth - the difference is ENA is not netting the 96,000 dth Loan with the park and Sonat is showing an additional day of withdrawal of 8,588 dth in January 2002.

Chris's notes:
Sonat Park & Loans

2/19/02  History  - Per Dave Dyer (205-326-2007) at Sonat
ENA has 2 Park & Loan (PAL) contracts with Sonat.  All PAL's with Sonat are under master contract PAL1001.  Sonat assigns a deal number to each deal under this contract.

Deal #1424 - ENA borrowed a total of 96,000 dth from Nov 3rd-5th and has not paid this back.  ENA still owes Sonat 96,000 dth.  The terms of the deal were to payback Sonat anytime with 3 days notice on any 3 days on 2002,   SONAT ONLY CHARGED ENA $96.00 FOR THIS DEAL, because Sonat needed to get gas off the system.

Deal #1222 - ENA parked 309,192 dth in August to come out in Jan 2002.  Sonat let ENA withdraw 42,951 on 11/29/01 leaving a balance of 266,241 dth.  In Jan 2002, ENA withdrew 8,588 dth per day for the 1st-9th.  That left a balance of 188,949 dth.  On Jan 8th, 2002, Sonat sent a letter stating that Sonat will hold on to the remaining to balance to offset 1) the Loaned gas on deal #1424 (96,000 dth) and 2) to offset dollars ENA has not paid Sonat for gas Sonat sold to ENA in October 2001.  According to Sonat, the remaining balance on this deal is 92,949 dth = [309,192 parked in Aug - 42,951 w/d in Nov - 77,292 w/d in Jan - 92,000 balance on #1424].  According to Sonat's letter, Sonat has filed the appropriate motion for court approval for the offsets.  According to Dave, ENA is being billed $.00305 x daily balance in this account.  ENA should have paid some bigger amount went the gas was parked in August.

Other items;
ENA purchased system supply from Sonat in October 2001.  ENA purchased 286,998 at an average price of $3.063 = $879,030.42.  According to Sonat, ENA did not pay for this before Enron declared bankruptcy.  ENA also sold Sonat gas - 16,000 dth day at $2.885 (sitara #1172076) in January 2002 and 10,000 dth day at $2.955 in May 2002 (sitara #1172087).  ENA used 77,292 dth (8,588 dth per day for Jan 1st - 9th) of the parked gas on deal #1222 to supply the 16,000 dth before Sonat stopped ENA from withdrawing from the park.  ENA defaulted on 418,708 dth of the Sonat deal in January.

Sonat's in house legal counsel is Patti Frances (205-325-7696).  I left a message for Patti to call me.

2/20/02
Patti Frances returned my call.  Patti said the motion is currently set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th.  I asked Patti if there were any penalties for not performing on the Jan 2002 sale to Sonat and if Sonat was going to pay for the 77,292 dth that ENA did supply.  Patti said she didn't think there were penalties but she would verify that and see if they were going to pay.  I also asked her if Sonat is still honoring the ENA sale to Sonat in May 2002 and if Sonat would pay ENA if ENA performed.  She will check on it and call me back.


Attached is the latest version of the ABB Transformer Agreement along
with a marked version showing changes from the previously circulated
November draft.  Please feel free to contact Peter Thompson or Elaine
Farris should you have any questions.

Faye Stedman
Word Processor

<<ABB Power T&D Company Form Transformer Purchase Agt..DOC>>  <<ABB
Transformer Agreement Comparison of v. 3 to 5.DOC>>
 - ABB Power T&D Company Form Transformer Purchase Agt..DOC
 - ABB Transformer Agreement Comparison of v. 3 to 5.DOC


Why is Bill Clinton so reluctant to decide the fate of Elian
Gonzalez?

Because last time he made a decision about where to put a Cuban, he
was impeached.


The Senate Energy Utilities and Communications Committee will take up the
folling items next week pending approval of the Rules Committee:

Tuesday, August 21 - 1:30 p.m.

Informational Hearing: "A Review of DWR's Electricity Rate Agreement"

Wednesday, August 22 - 1:30 p.m.

AB 1233 (Pescetti) This bill would prohibit assessment of local transmission
rates on natural gas if (a) it is delivered to an end-use customer, (b) it
is delivered through a transmission system owned by another entity  that is
not interconnected with a local utility transmission system, and (c) it is
blended with gas supplies produced from an in-state source for the purposes
of achieving a usable thermal rate.  The bill would require the commission
to administer this provision in a manner that prohibits any cost shift to
core customers resulting from the rate exemption required under the bill.

ABX2 14 (Canciamilla) This bill exempts certain natural gas producers,
suppliers and transporters from the definition of a public utility as
described in Public Utilities Code Sections 216, 222 and 228.  Specifically,
this bill; (1) provides that a public utility does not include a gas
producer, supplier or transporter if the gas produced is of insufficient
quality or heating value to make it acceptable for introduction into the gas
line, plant or system of a gas corporation and if the natural gas is not
provided for sale to more than five end users, 2)provides that a "gas
corporation" does not include a producer, supplier or transporter as defined
in item #1 above, 3)provides that a "pipeline corporation" does not include
a producer, supplier or transporter as defined in item #1 above (4)
establishes that entities covered by the exemption from public utility
status as gas suppliers, producers or transporters are subject to
jurisdiction of the CPUC with regard to safety, service quality, and
consumer protection, and
5)requires these exempt entities to apply the public goods charge to end use
customers, as applicable.

ABX2 30 (Dutra) This bill would amend CPUC act to authorize a public entity
to assume from a public utility the work of relocating utilities that
relates to a project of the public entity if the public utility defaults on
executing utility relocation work under a relocation agreement with the
public entity in connection with a transit or transportation capital
improvement project, and would authorize the public entity to issue
contracts with another qualified entity to conduct the utility relocation
work. The bill would require a public utility to reimburse the public entity
for the utility's share of the costs of the relocation work in accordance
with the relocation agreement with the public entity.


Ken,

I finally found Franco Bernabe's work number: +39-06-3600-4741
      +39-06-3600-4742

He actually returned my call (I had left a message with his secretary
saying that you were looking to talk to him). He mentioned that IMI (the
Italian investment bank) would like to do a joint-venture with us to
develop a power trading structure. He will put me in contact with someone
at IMI.

You can reach him at any of the above numbers.

Best wishes

Giuseppe Galata
ECT London (Italian Team)


Sara:

Confirming receipt of the draft Schedule and
the Credit Support Annex to the ISDA Master
Agreement.

I have talked to Joe Gordon this afternoon
regarding the credit & collateral issues.

It is my understanding that Enron would
prefer to have the agreement in place &
we would hold back on transactions pending
further credit discussions with Ed Sacks.

I am out of town on Thursday & Friday; I will
touch base with you on Monday.

Thanks again for your assistance in this regard.

Jim Delani
Energy New England


Shalesh,

Thanks.

Vince

	From:  Shalesh Ganjoo                           01/10/2000 06:34 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations

Vince,

Congratulations!  I wish you the best of luck with your new responsibilities.

Shalesh Ganjoo


All our products are 100% guaranteed.
We always have what you need for less.

Follow this link:
http://store.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/clink?pcwebclub+GJcRvc+index.html

"Great experience; No problems. Everything went extremely
smoothly. Fast shipping, I was very impressed! I will
definitely do business with them again."
Lee in Minnesota who saved $46

"There were absolutely no problems with ordering my
products and they arrived in a timely manner. This is
exactly the way that I expect any e-business to operate."
Alex in Louisiana who saved $108

Go now to:
http://store.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/clink?pcwebclub+GJcRvc+index.html

Here are some examples:

For Inkjet Printers--
HP 51645A black refill kit only $12.99 compare to original $59.98
Epson S020189 black cartridge $11.95 compare to original $27.99
Lexmark 12A1970 black refill kit $14.95 compare to original $61.98
Canon BCI-21B black ink tank only $6.75 compare to original $8.99

For Laser Printers--
HP 92274A LaserJet only $59.85 compare to original $133.57
HP C3900A LaserJet only $135.95 compare to original $204.00
HP C4129X LaserJet only $129.95 compare to original$165.99
HP C4092A LaserJet only $49.95 compare to original $56.99
We carry supplies for many other brands.

Follow this link:
http://store.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/clink?pcwebclub+GJcRvc+index.html

FREE Gift with orders over $60 for a limited time.

Getting your supplies from PCWebClub is easy to do
and less expensive than discount office supply stores.

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?funnymoney:10
* Enter your email address (Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "funnymoney:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:1c.1bdj.803w8


Hey team.  I'm putting some high level information together about the Dominion Producers and I have a couple questions.

First, the worksheet.
I'm using the information Dominin Fed X'd to us 2 weeks ago.
Allocation Balance Report by production month.  The monthy receipt volume net of fuel in columns B through D on the worksheet.
Imbalance Signoff Sheet by accounting month.  The accumulated Dt Imbalance is in columns F through G on the worksheet.
Allocation Balance Report.  The total adjustment quanity by contract by accounting month is in columns J through L on the worksheet.

Questions
1.   The Dec 2001 receipt volumes seem very low.  I'm sure that high line pressure was keeping most of the production volume from flowing.  Did we lose any producers between Nov and Dec, before the gas flowed?

2.  I am assuming that most of this gas was priced at Index.  Do you agree?

Let me know if you have questions.  I'll probably have a few more for you two.

thanks


1.  FCE rejected Section 9.2 before.  Perhaps this provision should only be
triggered if a specific quality problem is identified.
2.  10.1.1 (ii)--Shouldn't standard be that FCE uses commercially reasonable
efforts to manufacture, deliver and install the Equipment in accordance with
Exhibit N-3.
3.  10.1.2--Purchase trigger dates need to be based on when on the major
equipment is delivered to the site in an undamaged condition.
4.  10.2.1--Shouldn't this section be eliminated?  Is this the point of
termination schedule.  I don't want to pay FCE for shipment delays unless
Purchaser directly and fully caused them.
5.  Section 10--Need sound guarantee.
 6.  Section 10--Where do we say that all tests will be performed on a unit
by unit basis and in accordance with the specified protocol.
7.  Section 10.5.3--Need to incorporate FCE proposal.
8.  Section 10.6 (c)--My question on lien releases; will it be done on a unit
by unit basis or on a facility basis?
9.  Section 10--Assuming that we adopt language that Output is the only test
with a performance band, where do we put in the language about the purchase
price adjustment if it is within a bound.  Even though we have not agreed to
the % bound, we probably can write the generic language (or pull it from
another document).
10.  Section 10.7--Add note--Waiting for response on other ENA proposal
before deleting.


A great tool, launched from the right platform. We are definitely making progress around here. Keep it up. Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Andrews, Naveen
Sent:	Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:40 AM
To:	Buy, Rick; Bradford, William S.; Murphy, Ted; Curry, Wanda; Rohauer, Tanya; Brackett, Debbie R.; Ruane, Mark; Wilson, Mark K; Harris, Molly; Carson, Rick L.; Mcginnis, Stephanie; Walker, Mark A.; Adams, Matthew; Andrews, Naveen; Dalia, Minal; Davenport, Lacrecia; Figueroa, Xochitl; Gorny, Vladimir; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Hayden, Frank; Khanna, Bharat; Nordstrom, Mary; Paraschos, Nick; Phillips, Rebecca; Port, David; Presley, Mike E; Reasoner, Monica; Bellinghausen, Lynn; Schmidt, Darin; Schultz, Cassandra; Suttle, John; Thomas, Mark; Vonderheide, Scott; Valdez, Veronica; Yuan, Ding; Zipter, Rudi; Barbour, Karen L.; Crews, David; Geraldo, Emy; Gorte, David; Hachen, James; Larson, Bradford; Ledlow, James; Metoyer, Pam; Petersen, Randy; Schlemmer, Jack; Schneider, Chip; Tribolet, Michael; Wilson, Shona; Abel, Chris; New, James; Trenholme, Fergus
Subject:	Extreme VaR

The Extreme VaR functionality is now operational on the RaC website.  The testing phase is completed, but ongoing calibration and fine-tuning will continue.  Extreme VaR represents a complement to Regular VaR, but concentrates on the Extreme Tail regions.  The default shown on the screen is at 99.7%.
It can easily be set up for any portfolio of interest and at a user-specified confidence level.

The following document summarizes the procedure to invoke it from your websites.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Naveen Andrews (58668).
 << File: EVARCustomizeProcedure.doc >>


There were a number of problems with the below email.  As a result, I am
sending it out again to smaller groups of people.  If you received the
original email then please ignore this one.

Please let me know if you have problems with the attached word document.

Ms. Barbara Hanlon
Assistant to General Counsel
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
600 Fifth Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, New York 10020-2302
Phone: (212) 332-1200
Fax: (212) 332-1212
http://www.isda.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barbara Hanlon
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 4:00 PM
> Cc: Michelle Hitchcock; Camille Irens; Kimberly Summe; Robert Pickel
> Subject: Restructuring Meeting in London
>
>  We understand that the London portion of the Restructuring Meeting
> on November 13 was not as comprehensive as members would have preferred,
> partly as a result of logistical difficulties.  I will be in London from
> December 13th - 15th and would like to have a meeting in London on
> December 14 from 4:30 - 6:00 p.m. at UBS Warburg's offices at 100
> Liverpool Street to hear the views of our London members on the
> Restructuring issue and to report on any subsequent developments.  If you
> would like to attend this meeting, please send an email to Barbara Hanlon
> at bhanlon@isda.org.
>
>  We have attached a copy of the minutes of the November 13 meeting.
>
>
> Robert Pickel
> General Counsel
> International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
> 600 Fifth Avenue, 27th Floor
> Rockefeller Center
> New York, New York 10020-2302
> Phone: (212) 332-1200
> Fax: (212) 332-1212
> http://www.isda.org
>
>
>   <<Minutes on  Restructuring Meeting.doc>>

 - Minutes on  Restructuring Meeting.doc


----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/Enron Communications on 11/06/00 04:41 PM
-----

	Wayne Gardner
	11/03/00 04:49 PM

		 To: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James
Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Beth Wapner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Draft questions on regulatory aspects of bandwidth trading

Donald, as promised, here are the questions that Jim, Beth and I put together
that we'd like you to delve into in our next meeting.  We'll send you the
final list first thing Monday.  Please let me know if you have questions or
comments.  Thanks.  WWG

W. Wayne Gardner
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002-7361
Phone:  713 853 3547
Fax:  713 646 2532


Low numbers.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
09:01 AM ---------------------------

Simone La Rose
12/18/2000 07:24 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT, Douglas S
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT,
George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Fallon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph P
Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cedric
Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, michael.r.brown@enron.com, Allan
Sommer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Bruce Garner/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT,
Paul Goddard/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kal
Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Savita
Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Bridges/NA/Enron@ENRON, Justin
Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Matt Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Berzins/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lydia Cannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnronOnline Management Report for December 15, 2000

Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/15/2000
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,153
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,310
Total Life to Date Transactions	529,333

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/15/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,379	69%
Enron Europe Limited	182	39%
Global Products	109	27%
Enron Metals	483	25%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,190,813,840
MTD	39,901,692,567
LTD	318,754,453,897
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,389,756,362

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	21,245,199,246

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	612
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	0
Number of Products Offered Today	1,008
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,294
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,021

Also attached is the Weekly Public Domain Report, containing information
which is intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000
08:25 AM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Amir Ahanchian/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:

Subject: GAME TONIGHT @ 7:00

We have a game tonight at 7:00.  Please try to make it to the field by 6:30.

-Eric


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/15/2001>, published as of 11/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


I've told Presto to relax 17 times.  Just deal with me on this one.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 09/06/2000
07:35 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Kevin M Presto @ ECT                           09/06/2000 07:28 AM

To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Chris Dorland

Please give me an update on the overall status of Chris Dorland relocation
from Calgary to Houston.  As Lavo has already indicated to you, Chris will be
joining the East Power Trading group as the PJM cash trader.  Chris is
anxious to get the process rolling so he can make the transition to Houston
no later than October 2, 2000.  In particular the following package needs to
be put together and overnighted to Chris this week.

 1) Visa paperwork (Canada to US)
 2) Relocation specifics (move coordination & $'s for move)
 3) New US salary (Chris expectation is $80k/yr US)

Please give me an update as soon as possible.

Thanks David.


Jeez, you're a superman.  Talk to you on the call tomorrow.