Amy,

Yes, I am interested. I am in London now, but I shall contact him on
Thuirsday.

Vince

Amy FitzPatrick
02/21/2000 03:34 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CV of Rodney Greene re quantitative positions.

Vince -

Would you have any interest in this candidate?

Kind regards -
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy FitzPatrick/LON/ECT on 21/02/2000
09:34 ---------------------------

Bryan Seyfried
18/02/2000 19:50
To: Amy FitzPatrick/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: CV of Rodney Greene re quantitative positions.

probably a bit to techy for me but maybe a good fit for Vince Kaminski in
Houston Research.

bs

Amy FitzPatrick
17/02/2000 12:52
To: David Port/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W
Young/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: CV of Rodney Greene re quantitative positions.

Any thoughts on this candidate?

Kind regards -
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy FitzPatrick/LON/ECT on 17/02/2000
12:52 ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Simon Bragg <sb@michelangelo.co.uk>
17/02/2000 12:36

To: "'amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com'" <amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: CV of Rodney Greene re quantitative positions.

Hi Amy

A colleague of mine interviewed someone last week who is a PHD whose
background is as a developer within catastrophe risk management. He is
looking to move into more of a quantitative role which will utilise his
developing  skills and also his statistical and theoretical knowledge as
well. The issue is that he is based in Chicago and I wondered if there
would be any interest from your headquarters there.

Please find attached his details.

Speak to you soon.

Regards

Simon

 - D0075530.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 07:11 AM
---------------------------

Yahoo! Finance <refertofriend@reply.yahoo.com> on 04/04/2001 12:07:23 AM
Please respond to sneal12@mindspring.com
To: sneal@enron.com
cc: sneal12@mindspring.com
Subject: Yahoo! Finance Story - Yahoo - RESEARCH ALERT-Goldman raises most
energy estimates

  (sneal12@mindspring.com) has sent you a news article

Personal message:

the distribution continues!

Yahoo - RESEARCH ALERT-Goldman raises most energy estimates
http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/010403/n03442939_2.html

Yahoo - RESEARCH ALERT-Goldman raises most energy estimates
Finance Home Yahoo! - Help

[ Latest Headlines | Market Overview | News Alerts ]

Related Quotes

BP
CHV
RD
SC
TX
XOM

47.88
86.00
53.87
45.70
64.35
77.90

-0.52
-0.87
-0.93
-0.55
-0.65
-1.70

delayed 20 mins - disclaimer

Tuesday April 3, 12:03 pm Eastern Time

RESEARCH ALERT-Goldman raises most energy estimates

NEW YORK, April 3 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs on Tuesday increased its 2001 and
2002 oil company earnings estimates almost across the board, with the
exception of some of the mega-oils where expectations were slightly lowered.

Goldman Sachs Integrated Oil analyst Arjun Murti raised 2001 EPS estimate for
BP Amoco American Depository Receipts (ADR) quote from Yahoo! UK & Ireland:
BP.L)(NYSE:BP - news) to $3.69 from $3.59 and 2002 EPS estimate to $2.86 from
$2.79.

For Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE:XOM - news), Murti lowered 2002 EPS estimate to
$3.89 from $3.90.

Murti lowered 2001 EPS estimate for Royal Dutch (U.S.) (NYSE:RD - news) to
$3.32 from $3.48 and raised 2002 EPS estimate to $2.75 from $2.74. He raised
his 2001 EPS estimate for Shell T&T (NYSE:SC - news) quote from Yahoo! UK &
Ireland: SHEL.L) to $2.85 from $3.00 and raised 2002 EPS estimate to $2.37
from $2.36.

For Chevron Corp. (NYSE:CHV - news) he raised his 2001 EPS estimate to $7.36
from $7.21, and raised his 2002 EPS estimate to $5.52 from $5.34, but lowered
his 2001 estimate for Texaco Inc. (NYSE:TX - news) to $4.73 from $4.84.
However, for 2002, he raised his EPS estimate for Texaco to $3.37 from $3.23.

He raised 2001 EPS estimate for Unocal Corp. (NYSE:UCL - news) to $3.03 from
$2.42 and 2002 EPS estimate to $2.00 from $1.84.

For USX-Marathon (NYSE:MRO - news) Murti raised 2001 EPS estimate to $3.72
from $3.26 and 2002 EPS estimate to $1.67 from $1.48. Murti raised 2001 EPS
estimate for Kerr-McGee Corp. (NYSE:KMG - news) to $6.60 from $5.71.

Murti raised 2001 EPS estimate for Murphy Oil Corp. (NYSE:MUR - news) to
$6.32 from $5.77 and for Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (NYSE:APC - news) to $4.78
from $4.58.

Murti raised 2001 EPS estimate for Conoco, Inc. (NYSE:COCb - news) to $2.94
from $2.70 and 2002 EPS estimate to $2.01 from $1.88. Murti raised 2001 EPS
estimate for Amerada Hess Corp. (NYSE:AHC - news) to $10.79 from $10.25 and
2002 EPS estimate to $4.64 from $4.02.

For Occidental Petroleum Corp. (NYSE:OXY - news), Murti raised 2001 estimate
to $3.10 from $2.54 and 2002 EPS estimate to $1.63 from $1.48. Murti raised
2001 EPS estimate for Phillips Petroleum Company (NYSE:P - news) to $6.98
from $6.76 and 2002 EPS estimate to $4.21 from $4.05.

Email this story - Most-emailed articles - Most-viewed articles

More Quotes
and News:
	BP Amoco PLC (NYSE:BP - news)
	Chevron Corp (NYSE:CHV - news)
	Exxon Mobil Corp (NYSE:XOM - news)
	Royal Dutch Petroleum Co (NYSE:RD - news)
	Shell Transport & Trading Co PLC (NYSE:SC - news)
	Texaco Inc (NYSE:TX - news)

	Related News Categories: oil/energy, US Market News

Help

Copyright , 2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of
Service
Copyright , 2001 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or
redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior
written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or
delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Questions or Comments?


Zero's lunch bill was $65.00.  This is $7.22/person if that's ok with everyone on the way to divvy it up.

Lorraine


In light of the tragic events that occurred on September 11, 2001, our concern is to support our employees through this difficult time.  We would like to take this opportunity to remind you of a resource available to you, Enron's Employee Assistance Program.  This service is available to you or any member of your immediate family to provide counseling services.  To talk to a counselor, simply call (713) 853-6057 during business hours in Houston or the 24 hour service line at (800) 345-1391.  If you are outside the US, please contact your Human Resources Representative for further details.  Please also be aware of any colleagues who may require assistance during this time and may not be able to seek help for themselves.

Louise & John


This place is more difficult than it needs to be.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 05/29/2001 11:04 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Matching gift

Really!  I hate not having information.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/29/2001 10:57 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: nmann@erac.com
		 Subject: Re: Matching gift

Well, that's something I hadn't heard before.  They should let that be known,
don't you think?  At least now WE know it!

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 05/29/2001 10:56 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Matching gift

I talked to Vanessa Bob at x36781 regarding this matter.  She said she's
forwarded this on to the JK Group which will pay the amount shortly.  The
matching gifts are paid quarterly.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/22/2001 01:55 PM

		 To: community-relations@enron.com
		 cc: (bcc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Matching gift

Hello.

I gave the Matagorda County Fair & Livestock Association $2050, and filled
out the form for the match.  Please advise if this has been paid, as they are
sending me a bill for the $2050, plus a finance charge.

Thank you,

Kay Mann
x57566


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]     Search  Amazon.com for:

 We  hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather  not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please  visit the Help page  Updating  Subscriptions and Communication Preferences  and click the Customer  Communication Preferences link.   Please  note that this e-mail was sent to the following address:  sneal@ei.enron.com

[IMAGE]


<http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>	  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>
 	 Texas Monthly <http://www.texasmonthly.com>	   <http://images.clickability.com/logos/cc0000/emailthis-logo.gif>

  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>

  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>

 	 Click the following to access the sent link:

 	   <http://images.clickability.com/partners/989/etIcon.gif>Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1882864300>

 	 SAVE THIS link <http://texasmonthly.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=saveFromET&partnerID=989&etMailToID=1882864300>	 FORWARD THIS link <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&etMailToID=1882864300&partnerID=989>

Please note, the sender's email address has not been verified.

Get your EMAIL THIS Browser Button and use it to email information from any Web site.	  <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=browserButtons>

	  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>


It's a little hard to tell precise numbers from the charts so I need a "call
out" number from the charts ... specifically,what happened to microsoft's
turnover rate for how much stock decline -- eg did it go up 33% (from 9% to
12%) for "x" decline in the stock price?

	Suzanne Brown@ECT
	12/07/2000 11:39 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Correlation Analysis


Wed. 1/2	Thur. 1/3	Fri. 1/4
Allen, Phillip	in	out	out
Arnold, John	in	in	in
Belden, Tim	in	in	in
Black, Don	in	in	in
Calger, Chris	in	in	in
Davis, Dana	in	in	in
Duran, Dave	in	?	?
Grigsby, Mike	in	in	in
Lagrasta, Fred	in	in	in
Luce, Laura	in	in	in
Martin, Tom	in	in	in
Milnthorp, Rob	out	in	in
Neal, Scott	in	in	in
Presto, Kevin	in	out	out
Redmond, Brian	in	out	out
Shively, Hunter	in	in	in
Sturm, Fletch	in	in	in
Tycholiz, Barry	in	in	in
Vickers, Frank	out	?	?
Zufferli, John	in	in	in

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile


I apologize to those of you who are getting this twice - I want to make sure that everyone gets it.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bennett, Stephen
Sent:	Sunday, June 03, 2001 8:53 AM
To:	Roberts, Mike A.
Subject:	Sunday Weather Update 06/03

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron on 06/03/2001 08:53 AM ---------------------------

 	  From:  Stephen Bennett                           06/03/2001 08:37 AM

To:	"Allen, Phil@Home" <pallen70@hotmail.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, John Arnold/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mike Grigsby/ENRON@enronXgate, "Grigsby, Mike@Home" <MikeGrigsby@hotmail.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Keavey, Peter@Home" <pkeavey@hotmail.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Kelli Stevens@home" <rjkdstevens@aol.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, "Lewis, Andy@Home" <ahl-34@yahoo.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Mike Maggi/ENRON@enronXgate, Jose Marquez/ENRON@enronXgate, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, "Martin, Thomas A.@Home" <tmartin3079@msn.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Scott Neal/ENRON@enronXgate, "Neal, Scott@home" <sneal12@mindspring.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Pereira, Susan@Home" <pereira@houston.rr.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Kevin Ruscitti/ENRON@enronXgate, Jim Schwieger/ENRON@enronXgate, "Schwieger, Jim@Home" <Jim.Schwieger@rr.houston.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Shively, Hunter@Home" <hunter-jessica@houston.rr.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Hunter S Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, "Tom Donohoe@home" <tomcdonohoe@netzero.net>@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:

Subject:	Sunday Weather Update 06/03

Hi Everyone...

1)  The forecast pattern seems very similar to what we've been talking about over the past several days.  6-10 features below normal in the Midwest and the East with a brief normalization possible toward the Great Lakes next weekend (days 8 and 9) before more cool air arrives.  11-15 indicates yet another trough digging into the East (temperatures normal to below normal) with the primary ridge remaining in the Southwest (above to much above).

2) 1-5 Day forecast also looks similar still quite cool for the East and Midwest - though not quite as hot for the immediate West Coast.  Above to much above normal temperatures will be common across interior California for most of the week with a 1 to 2 day spike of warm temperatures near the coast mid-week.  No prolonged period of heat will affect the Northwest.

3) EarthSat will issue an "official" 6-10 and 11-15 forecast around 2pm today.  You can get this map by going to:  http://www.earthsat.com/misc/enron/   and then follow the "Sunday Update" link (near the bottom).  Login is "enron", Password is "enron".

Maps are attached - this is the way we feel things will look to start the day tomorrow.  *If there are any changes to this picture - it may be to warm the Midwest/ East closer to normal.  Right now this solution appears unlikely - but if there are any surprises tomorrow - it may be a SLIGHTLY warmer picture for the East.*

Enjoy the rest of your weekend...
Research Weather Team

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


The cruise is a western Caribbean cruise on a Carnival Lines ship - leaving
from Galveston on the 17th.  I'm actually looking forward to it.  I may not
be partying with the best of them (or have a body that would entitle me to
even try) but a week in warm weather in a deck chair with a good book and a
waiter bringing tropical drinks is sounding really good right now.

As for Europe, Ted is thinking London, Amsterdam, Berlin, Finland, Iceland
and Norway (think blond and English speaking).  Personally, I'm reasonably
flexible, but I'd rather go biking or barging through the wine country in
France or relaxing in a Tuscan hill town or villa than disco-hopping through
another Scandinavian capital or revisiting the bars in London.  Berlin,
Prague and Budapest appeal since I've never been to any of them.  Or maybe I
can get over to Barcelona just before your cruise with Ted - maybe with a few
days in the wine country or Madrid beforehand?


This email is to let you know that the October 2001 version of NEWGen is
available for download on www.rdionline.com.  If you do not want to receive
this email please reply with unsubscribe me as the subject line.

Thank You,

The NEWGen Staff


Sandeep:  Vince has asked me to coordinate with Margaret Daffin in our
international group to ensure that we acquire an L1 visa for Anshuman.  This
visa has to be in place before he will be able to work in the United States
in any capacity.   (Anshuman cannot work in the US on a B-1 visa--he can only
come here for business meetings or training.)  There are still several items
remaining to be completed for the L-1 process.  The first is a fairly
detailed job description for Anshuman.   Secondly, we will need to know
whether or not he will either be in a managerial position or whether he will
be managing a project while he is here in Houston.  Vince thought that you
would be best able to provide this information to us, and we would really
appreciate anything you can do to help us expedite this process.

If you have any questions, please give me a call at x34804.  Thank you for
your help.

Molly Magee


Chris,

Just wanted to let you know that I've decided to accept the position.  I'm looking forward to a challenging and exciting job ahead of me and want to thank you for giving me the opportunity.  I will do my very best to be an asset to your team.  Thanks again.

Lisa


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
02:09 PM ---------------------------

shirley.s.elliott@citicorp.com on 11/28/2000 12:32:55 PM
To: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: New Bongo Partners

this is pretty funny.  when you want to try sushi, give me a call.  i'll tell
you all the good stuff to get and we'll try some soy beans.  they are so good
for you and taste good too!  they're a great snack -- tons of protein, very
little fat and carbs.  you spelled it "discusting."

s.

-----Original Message-----
From: mowilliamson [SMTP:mowilliamson@deloitte.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 12:11 PM
To: shirley.s.elliott
Cc: mowilliamson
Subject: FW: New Bongo Partners

-----Original Message-----
From: Marix, Todd @ Houston Galleria [mailto:tmarix@cbre.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 12:07 PM
To: 'Mimi Marix'; 'Molly Williamson'
Subject: New Bongo Partners

-----Original Message-----
From:   Banks, Tre @ Houston Galleria
Sent:   Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:22 AM
To:     Marix, Todd @ Houston Galleria
Subject:        FW: wooderson

> say, man, you gotta joint..............it'd be a lot cooler if you
> did!!!!!!
>  <<new_bongo_partners.jpg>>
<<new_bongo_partners.jpg>>

- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Marix, Todd @ Houston Galleria  [mailto:tmarix@cbre.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 12:07  PM
To: 'Mimi Marix'; 'Molly Williamson'
Subject: New Bongo  Partners

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Banks,  Tre @ Houston Galleria
Sent:?? Tuesday, November  28, 2000 11:22 AM
To:???? Marix,  Todd @ Houston Galleria
Subject:??????? FW: wooderson

> say, man, you gotta joint..............it'd be a  lot cooler if you
> did!!!!!!
>? <<new_bongo_partners.jpg>>
<<new_bongo_partners.jpg>>

 - new_bongo_partners.jpg


The Fall 2001 Russian Outlook essay, "An Anchor in the Mud: Three Russian Novels as a Guide to Practicing Freedom and Constructing a New Self," by Leon Aron contains a number of words in Cyrillic, including a stanza from Boris Pasternak's poem "Hamlet."

If you were unable view the words in Cyrillic in yesterday's attachment, please go to http://www.aei.org/ro/rofront.htm to download this edition of the Russian Outlook from AEI's website.


got your message last night.  What is up?  Bet you are glad you are not working for the big E.  Things are not too good here.  Just waiting for the ax to drop.  Hope things are good in SF. Talk to you soon.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steve Bonilla <stevebonilla@yahoo.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 8:11 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Re: Hello

Hey Philip!

What's up? I have mixed feeling about you going to
ND...I', jealous! This year is out for me
unfortunately.  I have some friends that have gone to
games this year...I'll get the skinny on scalping.  It
shouldn't be much of a prop.  However, despite there
records, it's still ND and Tennesse. It will be sold
out.  But you can get tix.  I know this much. You
can't (or it's against school policy to )get tix on
campus. However, there are plenty of scalper on roads
leading to campus.

Sites to see.  Definietly check out the campus.  Make
time to see the lakes, go by the dome etc. It's
awesome. Also, it may be one of the games of the
week...so, look out for espn, nbc and all the rest.
The hype is great when networks other than nbc show.
Lots of small bars...avoid the linebacker, unless you
want to test that you have the endurance you had in
undergrad. College Football Hall of Fame is
there...downtown.  Tailgating is great....like I said
make sure you get to the game early. That way you'll
get the whole experience. Lots of tradition game day,
for example the Band marches from the dome to the
stadium....it's awesome.

I'll give you a call at work..

Later,

Steve
--- "Love, Phillip M." <Phillip.M.Love@ENRON.com>
wrote:
> How are things going?  Are you still in San
> Francisco?  If so I bet the
> city has been going crazy about Barry Bonds and you
> have been catching
> flack about the wimpy Astros and how they pitched
> him.
>
> Some guys and I make a trip every year to a
> different college football
> game and we changed it at the last minute this year.
>  We are now going
> to go to the Notre Dame v. Tennessee game.  I was
> going to hit you up
> for some information on your old stomping grounds.
> Were and when is the
> best place to scalp some tickets.  The brokers in
> Chicago think way to
> highly of a couple of teams with two or more losses.
>  Where should we
> hang out/ tailgate?  And what sites should we see
> besides Touchdown
> Jesus?
>
> Hope things are going well and give me a call when
> you head back this
> way.  Thanks.
> PL
>
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or
> its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential
> and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
> attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer
> (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
> (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
> recipient or any other party, and may not be relied
> on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
> or otherwise. Thank you.
>
**********************************************************************

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


I'd like to the redraft.  Sara

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	09/05/2000 09:02 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: El Paso Electric Company Draft

Sara -

I have made the changes you marked on the draft master.  I know we were
discussing some things on Thurs and were interrupted.  Do you want me to send
out the draft or do you want to discuss it further?

Thanks.


If someone can give me the name and address of Montana Power, I can finish
the exclusivity agreement today.

Kay


Les, on 12/24 I input the Willamette transaction as usual however I could not
get the deal number 471943 (transmission piece we have been using) to extend
to this day.  Therefore in order to keep us flat I just created one
transmission deal for 15MW HE 1-24 and used the normal pac transmission
price.  I am not sure if this is correct or how this should eactly be
handled.  I will be on break from the 24th thru the 30 so if you could fix
the deal if that is not the correct way to do it, that would be greatly
appreciated.  Also if you could let me know what was done for future
reference.  Thanks,  Merry x-mas and Happy New Year!


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 08:38
AM ---------------------------

12/06/2000 08:06 AM
Shelby Malkemes
Shelby Malkemes
Shelby Malkemes
12/06/2000 08:06 AM
12/06/2000 08:06 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: GE Mtg.

Please note that there will be a GE meeting with Lee Johnson this afternoon
as follows:

Date:  December 6, 2000
Time:  2:30pm CST
Place:  EB2934
Re:  GE

Should you have any questions / conflicts please feel free to call.

Thanks,
Shelby Malkemes
3-9842


---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 06:15 AM
---------------------------

James M Bannantine
02/01/2001 02:34 PM
To: Sao Paulo Brazil - Office Staff, Rio de Janeiro Brazil - Office Staff,
Salvador Brazil - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - Office Staff, Enron
South America - Houston Staff
cc:

Subject: announcement

It is with mixed emotions that I inform you that I have decided to leave
Enron to pursue other interests.  It has been a pleasure and an honor to have
worked with all of you over the past few years.   I can be reached through
the following numbers:

Jim Bannantine

email at bannant@attglobal.net
phone at 55-11-247-4449
fax at 55-11-5548-5528


Jens,

I think I have cc'ed  you on this. John Nowlan approved and Stinson Gibner
has the curves available for you.

Vince

Jens Gobel@ENRON
11/10/2000 04:44 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Forward oil prices

Hi Vince,

Have you already heard back from John Nowlan?

Thanks a lot for your help again. Have a great weekend.

Jens

Jens Gobel
10/26/2000 12:06 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Forward oil prices

Vince,

As discussed on the phone, I am sending you the request that I have received
from Prof. Buehler. Prof. Buehler is the
head of the faculty of finance at Mannheim University in Germany. Currently,
he is writing a study about the hedging
strategy that led to the Metallgesellschaft debacle. For this study he would
like to get forward oil prices form us.

The forward oil prices should be for WTI with Cushing as the delivery point
for the time period July 1986 and December 1996
with remaining contract durations between one and ten years. It would be
ideal to get this data on a daily basis. Weekly
or monthly data is helpful as well, of course.

Since Mannheim University is among Enron's tier one recruiting universities
in Germany, it would be great if we could help
him with some data. Thanks a lot for your help.

Jens

o.korn@uni-mannheim.de on 10/10/2000 11:44:57 AM
To: Jens.Gobel@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Daten

Sehr geehrter Herr Goebel,

bezugnehmend auf Ihr heutiges Telefongespraech mit Herrn Prof.
Buehler hat mich Prof. Buehler gebeten, Ihnen genauer
darzustellen, welche Daten idealerweise fuer unsere Studie
benoetigt wuerden.

Zunaechst zum Hintergrund. Wir sind auf ENRON gestossen, weil
Eduardo Schwartz in einer seiner Arbeiten die folgende Datenquelle
angibt:

" In addition to the publicly available futures data described above,
for the purpose of this study Enron Capital and Trade Resources
made available some proprietary historical forward price curves
from 1/15/93 to 5/16/96. From these data ten forward prices were
used in estimation, ranging in maturities from two months to nine
years"

Dies laesst uns annehmen, dass Enron bestimmte Daten
verfuegbar hat.

Nun zum idealen Datensatz:

Forwardoelpreise (am besten WTI mit Lieferung in Cushing) fuer
Restlaufzeiten zwischen einem und zehn Jahren fuer den Zeitraum
Juli 1986 bis Dezember 1996. Dabei waere eine hohe
Datenfrequenz ideal (taeglich, ansonsten woechentlich oder
monatlich). Zusaetzlich waeren auch Spotpreise fuer WTI mit
Lieferung in Cushing nuetzlich.

Diese idealen Datenanforderungen werden sich vermutlich nicht
erfuellen lassen. Jedoch waere uns auch schon geholfen, wenn ein
kuerzerer Zeitraum oder eine niedrigere Datenfrequenz vorlaege.

Wir waernen Ihnen sehr dankbar, wenn Sie in Erfahrung bringen
koennten, inwiefern solche Daten von Enron zu erhalten sind.

Herzlichen Dank fuer Ihre Muehe und beste Gruesse

Olaf Korn

p.s. Bei Rueckfragen stehe ich Ihnen jederzeit gern zur Verfuegung

__________________________________________________________
Dr. Olaf Korn
University of Mannheim
Chair of Finance
D-68131 Mannheim
Germany
Tel.: ++49/621/181-1487
Fax.: ++49/621/181-1519
e-mail: o.korn@uni-mannheim.de


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007588&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000007588
Request Create Date : 11/16/00 11:17:54 AM
Requested For       : kenneth.lim@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Product Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/21/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,529
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,716
Total Life to Date Transactions	460,395

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/21/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	4,028	78%
Enron Europe Limited	141	32%
Global Products	128	27%
Enron Metals	231	16%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	51%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	3,372,422,795
MTD	46,737,962,087
LTD	260,166,666,502
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,612,096,271

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	17,440,480,285

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	573
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,158
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,225
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,794


Gentlemen--thought you guys might be interested in this exchange on Gray
Davis's visit to Mayor Daley.  EES has been trying to do a deal with the City
of Chicago for quite a while now, and they are getting down to the wire in
deciding whether to go ahead as the deal is going to have to go before the
City Council next month for approval.
----- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron on 05/22/2001 11:52 AM -----

	Michael Lindert@EES
	05/22/2001 09:45 AM

		 To: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Chicago

Roy and Ed,
Actually, this is a non-event for us.  Davis was in town to review the City's
emergency action plan in the event of massive or rolling blackouts.  Steve
Walter met with him to brief him of the City's extremely thorough emergency
plan which was a result of the power outages a few summers ago.  The City is
looked to across the country as having a state-of-the-art plan that
encompasses over 1,600 critical facilities classified with an A-C rating.
Each of these City, County or State facitlities had a "hook-up" plate
installed on the outside of the building so a portable generator could be
moved into place in an emergency.  The plan also covers procedures, planning,
operations support center set up, etc.  Very comprehensive.  I suppose Mr.
Davis may just be thinking ahead....
Mike

PS.  If the conversation actually did extend into what else the City is doing
about electricity and Enron's name also came up, I doubt that we would be
viewed negatively at all, in fact, the exact opposite.  We are part of
Daley's plan to lessen his reliance on the terrible utility.  We are the
hammer and our long-term contract reinforces our relationship.  You can rest
assured, if California could do it all over again, long-term contracts would
be a key component of a successful move to deregulation...not spot market
purchases through a PX!  Ah yes, Chicago, the apple of Gov. Davis' eye...

From: Roy Boston on 05/22/2001 08:22 AM
To: Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Lindert/HOU/EES@EES, Janine
Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Chicago

Ed -- I don't think that this would change what we are trying to do nor the
way we're doing it.  Daley is not afraid to take non-liberal positions when
it best fits his ends ( e.g., he has made statements supporting the
President's energy policy because he has more faith in increasing supply
rather than in demand reductions) but since this is politics one can never be
entirely sure.  I'm sure that Daley knows Enron very well and especially
where Mr. Lay placed his support during the last election.  My read on this
algnment is that Daley will do what it takes to keep the energy issue from
becoming a "snow storm" type of issue -- for non-Chicagoans that refers to
the ability for administrations to change over how well the City clears
neighborhood streets during the previous winter's snow days.

	Edward Hamb
	05/21/2001 07:37 PM

		 To: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, Michael
Lindert/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Chicago

The bold highlight appears in Sunday gossip column of the Chicago Suntimes -
does this meeting change the political
dynamics of the deal - Davis adversial relationship with Enron - is this
something we should be worried about

               May 20, 2001

               BY MICHAEL SNEED SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

               Scoopsville . . .

               Watch for California Gov. Gray Davis, who has been hit by his
state's energy
               crisis, to visit Mayor Daley this week and ask for pointers.
Daley is the fella who
               successfully hammered ComEd into submission.

               A blues whisper . . .

               Pssst! Mayor Daley has been asking questions about the status
of Gerri's Palm
               Tavern, a legendary blues tavern at 446 E. 47th, whose future
is the center of an
               ongoing South Side neighborhood debate.

               Ol' Man River . . .

               There wasn't a dry eye in the house.

               Actor/singer/professor William Warfield, 82, who was presented
with the Chicago
               Historical Society's Making History Award Thursday night,
stunned the audience
               when he repeated history.

               * To wit: Warfield, a Grammy winner, opera singer and
professor of music at the
               University of Illinois and Northwestern University, sang . . .
the song he made
               famous in the 1951 hit movie "Show Boat," starring Ava
Gardner, Kathryn
               Grayson and Howard Keel: "Ol' Man River."

               Tips & twaddle . . .

               * Wonder when Tom Cruise, who is divorcing Nicole Kidman, is
going to rename
               his plane? It's called: "Sweet Nic."

               * Presidential daughter Jenna Bush, who just pleaded no
contest to a charge of
               underage drinking, reportedly wears a toe ring.

               * Former Veep Al Gore may have gained 30 pounds, but the
Washington Post is
               reporting former President Bill Clinton has dropped almost 20
pounds.

               * Attorney General John Ashcroft reportedly holds daily prayer
sessions with
               Justice Department employees.

               * Harvey Mayor Nickolas Graves tells Sneed that World
Changers, a Southern
               Baptist volunteer organization, hits Harvey next month--at his
invitation--to restore
               and rehabilitate homes, including two historical homes on
154th Street.

               Celluloid chat . . .

               The chapel at McInerney Funeral Home will be filled today, but
not with people
               attending a funeral.

               * Translation: The 128-year-old Canaryville funeral home is
the site of filming for
               "Stolen Summer," the Miramax film written by Chicago native
Pete Jones, who
               won the Project Greenlight contest organized by Matt Damon and
Ben Affleck.
               The film stars actors Aidan Quinn, Kevin Pollak and Brian
Dennehy. According
               to Celine McInerney, this is the first time the funeral home
has been used for
               anything but . . . funerals.


Steve:

here are some of the major headlines for California.    I have not found the
report dealing with FERC and the rest of the country, yet.   I will continue
to look for more FERC trade press reports.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 03:55 PM ---------------------------

	  From:  Julie Brewer @ ENRON                           03/28/2001 11:32 AM

To:	Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott L PALMER/ENRON@enronxgate, Jeff Royed/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject:

Please rebook as indicated by credit.

Thanks.


Electric Business Understanding - May 2, 2001

EB552 - 8:00 am - 5:00 pm          Cost:  $600.00

The Electric Business Understanding Seminar will give a basic overview of the
electric business for those with limited knowledge of this industry. This
seminar is recommended for entry level to mid-level employees in either the
gas or electric business or in businesses providing services to these
industries. This course will provide you with a general understanding of how
the electric business operates, who the key industry participants are, the
strategies they employ to be successful, and how the business is likely to
evolve.
Please click here for registration
http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any
questions, please call 713 853-0357.


Trish,

I could not access his neural network site.
It requires access password.

Vince

	From:  Patricia Tlapek                           06/12/2000 03:57 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Followup

---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000
03:57 PM ---------------------------

Barcharts@aol.com on 06/09/2000 10:01:59 AM
To: patricia.tlapek@enron.com, mike.roberts@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Followup

Good Morning,

I enjoyed visiting you yesterday afternoon to discuss the opportunity at
Enron.  Sounds exciting, challenging and a good use of a lot of my skills and
experience.  I look forward to further talks, hopefully this coming week.

I mentioned a couple web sites and don't know if they came through clearly on
the phone with my sore throat.

The neural network approach to timing can be found at
http://www.pfr.com/ptonline/

The introductory piece on technical analysis I wrote for Forbes.com and the
glossary can be found at htttp://www.forbes.com/tool/html/00/Jun/0603/feat.htm

I am also working with long time friend and neighbor Steve Nison with his
site and you can see the first on line lesson for free at
http://www.candlecharts.com/

Have a nice weekend.  Hope to hear from you next week.

Bruce M. Kamich, CMT
barcharts@aol.com
732-463-8438


Dear Dale and Brent,

We have checked this morning and these do not seem to have been loaded yet.
Is there anything else that we need to do from the Tokyo side?

This is very urgent.

Thanks

Jane McBride

----- Forwarded by Jane McBride/AP/Enron on 09/25/2000 10:33 AM -----

	John Viverito
	09/25/2000 10:31 AM

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Japanese Weather Derivative GTC's for EOL

FYI
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 09/24/2000 08:30 PM -----

	Brent Hendry
	09/21/2000 08:16 AM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan
Whitehead/AP/Enron@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morten E
Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Japanese Weather Derivative GTC's for EOL

The documents can be loaded.  Please note that the style and font of the Tax
representation section will need to conform to the rest of the document.
Dale what needs to happen next.  John, I am working on trying to develop a
policy and language to incorporate into certain of the Password Applications
that would require the counterparty to specify a process agent in the US.  I
think this policy would also be applicable as well to any Non-US counterparty
or Non-Japanese counterparty that would trade under this GTC.  I will keep
you informed of my progress.

Thanks,
Brent


Please forward your email to the RAC group requesting the opening of this account.  Thanks. Sara

-----Original Message-----
From: Doukas, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Heard, Marie
Subject: FW: Prime Brokerage Clearance Services Agreement

I have another one for you guys.  I do not anticipate any urgency on this, but would still like it out of the way.

Thanks,

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Grice, Regan [mailto:regan.grice@funb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Doukas, Tom
Subject: Prime Brokerage Clearance Services Agreement

Mr. Doukas:

On September 27, we opened a prime brokerage account in the name Enron
Credit Inc. Bear Stearns is acting as Prime Broker on this account, and
First Union Securities, Inc. is executing your securities. The SEC requires
the Clearing Broker (us) to have the attached agreement on file for our
prime brokerage clients.

If you would be so kind as to have this agreement signed, I would greatly
appreciate it. If you have any questions, you can call me at 704-593-7024.
Once it is completed, it can be faxed back to my attention at 704-593-7032.

Thank you and best regards,

Regan Grice
First Union Capital Markets, Documentation
Phone: 1-800-735-1470 or 704-593-7278
Fax: 704-593-7032

 <<Enron Credit 151.doc>>


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 05:28 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	08/08/2000 05:06 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/08/00

The EOL approvals for 08/08/00 are attached below.

Thanks,
Brad


---------------------- Forwarded by Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 01:39
PM ---------------------------

"Transaction Coordinator" <transcrd@mapp.org>@mapp.org on 01/30/2001 01:26:13
PM
Sent by: owner-rtc@mapp.org
To: <rin@mapp.org>, <pemc@mapp.org>, <rtc@mapp.org>
cc:
Subject: Miles City DC Tie Policy - Updated 01/30/2001

Dear MAPP Schedule F Transmission Customers,

The Miles City DC Tie Policy has changed as of January 30, 2001.

Effective 12:00 Noon, 01/31/2001

The Policy for submitting requests for transmission service to the
WAUW.MPCO, WAUW.WACM service points under MAPP Schedule F:

Until further notice, the following policy affects requests for transmission
service to the subject service points submitted between 12:00:00 noon and
12:05:00 p.m. Central Time shall be observed.

If more than five (5) requests are submitted by the same Transmission
Customer or group of Affiliated Transmission Customers within the specified
time period to either one of the service points then all such requests shall
be considered as invalid.

MAPP will set the status of all such invalid transmission requests to
INVALID.   (For example, Six requests to WAUW.MPCO submitted between Noon
and 12:05 p.m. by the same Transmission Customer or group of Affiliated
Transmission Customers would have ALL (6) set to INVALID.

In addition the policy is posted under the MAPP Schedule F OASIS page, and
then click on OASIS Business Practices.

The URL below will also take you there:
http://mapp.oasis.mapp.org/documents/MAPP/noondctieupdate_013001.html

Please contact the MAPP Transaction Coordinator if you have any further
questions.

Sincerely,

MAPP Transaction Coordinator
(651) 632-8508


who is up for milagro or something tonight?


Mark,

in the light of this, I am feeling uncomfortable about asking my staff to fly to Houston for the conference. Several of them have already spoken to me about this and expressed their nervousness.

Can we talk about this this pm on our call.

Thanks

							Mark

J. Mark Evans
Enron Europe Legal Department
direct tel: 44 207 783 5424
direct fax: 44 207 783 8287
email: mark.evans@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of Enron Corp Business Controls@ENRON
Sent:	20 September 2001 02:12
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject:	SECURITY TRAVEL UPDATE

As we return to our regular business activities following last week's tragic events, we wanted to disseminate as widely as possible the following information on security and travel.  Updates will be posted as necessary under "bulletins" on the Corporate Security website located at www.home.enron.com.

We do not believe that any terrorist groups will target Enron's employees or facilities.  As a precautionary measure, however, we have increased security in and around our facilities.  We urge all employees to maintain a heightened sense of awareness and to immediately report any suspicious activity to Enron Corporate Security in Houston at (713) 345-2804.

All non-essential business travel should be postponed until further notice.   Airline schedules and flights will be disrupted for some time - and bomb hoaxes, false alarms, and increased security measures will result in additional delays and disruptions.  In addition, all carriers, particularly U.S. carriers and those of U.S. allies such as Israel and NATO member countries, may be at risk for copycat hijackings.

	We realize that, as Enron conducts its business, some air travel is unavoidable.   Enron employees who wish to discuss their travel options should contact Corporate Security at (713) 345-2804 or via email at CorporateSecurity@enron.com.

	U.S. military action in retaliation for the terrorist attacks may result in violent Islamic extremist reactions in a number of countries, particularly in Afghanistan, Yemen, and Pakistan, as well as in Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Gaza/West Bank, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria and Tajikistan.  Reactions could take the form of acts by individuals or organized groups against U.S. government or commercial facilities.  All travel to or through these countries should be canceled.

Most of the U.S.' busiest airports have implemented the FAA's stepped-up security measures and are open and operating, with the exception of Washington Reagan National Airport.  If you are traveling by air, allow plenty of time to check in under these new security procedures.  Contact your carrier directly to find out about flight schedules and specific boarding requirements.  You can find more information on the new security standards as well as a list of airports that have certified they can meet the new security standards on the FAA's website at http://www.faa.gov.


sounds fun.  i think i am going to go out there at lunch and get some dancing
in.


Hey, Russell:  Are you handling the "Cargill-Alliant, LLC" credit?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 12:18 PM -----

	Mara_Alexander@cargill.com
	11/15/2000 12:14 PM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Master Agreements between Enron North America Corp. and
Cargill, Incorporated and Cargill-Alliant, LLC

Dear Sara,

With respect to our recent exchange of voice-mail messages,
I await to receive from you at your earliest opportunity
a draft of the Amendment to the Credit Support Annex between
Enron North America Corp. and Cargill, Incorporated.

I have also been advised by our Credit Department that we are
to begin negotiations on an ISDA Master Agreement between Enron
North America Corp. and Cargill-Alliant, LLC.  We assume the
ISDA being amended above would serve as a basis for this new
Agreement.  Could you please advise if you will also be handling
negotiation of the Cargill-Alliant, LLC ISDA?

Regards,
Mara Alexander
Sr. Documentation Analyst
Cargill, Incorporated
Tel: 952.984.3417
Fax: 952.984.3872
e-mail: Mara_Alexander@Cargill.com


Linda,

Lee just found the invoices, I think.  I will confirm shortly.

Britt

P.S. to Matt--I inadvertantly forget to send you an e-mail that is attached
to this one.

	Linda R Guinn@ECT
	12/12/2000 09:23 AM

		 To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO/Re: WFW - pacific virgo invoices

Britt --

I do not have a copy of the WFW invoice.  I have requested same from Angeline
and she indicated she would be forwarding to it to me.  I will forward on to
you when I receive it.

Linda Guinn
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6104
(713) 646-3393 (fax)

	Britt Davis@ENRON
	12/12/2000 09:05 AM

		 To: Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO/Re: WFW - pacific virgo invoices

Linda,

Could you send the WFW bill down to me please?  I just changed admin
assistants and my new a/a, Lee, could not find that in the file.  Richard
wanted me to take a look and try to apportion it between his r/c and Alan's,
given my statement to Richard that the WFW bill contains a lot of time that I
(and I believe Matt shares this belief) was directed to resolution of the
dispute with FGH.

Britt

P.S. to Matt-- what do you think about asking Neale if he would take a look
at that bill and apportion the time spent between the cargo claim versus the
FGH matter?
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000 09:01 AM -----

	Angeline Poon@ECT
	12/11/2000 08:08 PM

		 To: Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: WFW - pacific virgo invoices

Hi Linda

I have just faxed to you the statement that reflects the various items
charged by Watson Farley, which was attached to Watson's invoice.  My
apologies for any inconvenience caused.

Angie

From: Linda R Guinn on 12/12/2000 12:14 AM
To: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: WFW - pacific virgo invoices

Hi Angeline --

I received your fax this date regarding the WFW pacific virgo invoice.  What
I am looking for is  a copy of the back-up to the statement you sent.  In
other words, I need a breakdown of the time billed by each attorney working
on this matter.   All I have is the one page listing $137,455.18 -- what does
this consist of?  Please forward this to me so I can arrange for payment of
this invoice.  Thanks.

Linda Guinn
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6104
(713) 646-3393 (fax)


Hey guys!  Today is my last day at Intel.  Check out my new email at:
scottkuehn@go2netmail.com

I will be in Gig Harbor for awhile, and can be reached at (253) 851-7530

Talk to you soon,
Scott

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kuehn, M Scott
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:42 PM
To:	Nicholson, Bradley A; Reed, James D; Turtel, Scott; Brownell, Brenda; Ascenzi, Michael T; Powell, Neil D; Toller, Wade M; Clark, Saundra F; Jarman, Parry W; Lee, Ken; Samuels, Eric; Hroncich, Timothy B; Paul, Jacob M; Tseng, Nancy H; Maloney, Paul; McGuire, Mike; Dalgleish, Ken; Szatkiewicz, Jason M; Breuer, Lisa A; Junker, Richard D; Behunin, Abigail J; Billa, Roberto A; Hess, Michael J; Soldonia, Matias J; Staneff, Matthew A; Szatkiewicz, Jason M; Morgan, Bryan K
Subject:	Scott Kuehn Leaving Intel

Hello Everyone,
Today is my last day at Intel.  Thanks everyone for a great experience.  I have enjoyed working with all of you and hope to stay in touch!

I will be moving to Gig Harbor on Thursday and can be reached at (253) 851-7530.
My new email account starting tomorrow is:  scottkuehn@go2netmail.com

Farewell,
Scott Kuehn


Sam,

It's coming soon.

Vince
--------------------------vince kaminski


Interesting assist from Jones?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Smith [mailto:ken@kdscommunications.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Sharma, Ban; Leboe, David; Eric Letke; Thome, Jennifer; Bev Hansen; Hedy Govenar; Buster, Miyung; Guerrero, Janel; Robert Frank; Mike Day; Lawner, Leslie; Kingerski, Harry; Karen Denne; Kean, Steven J.; Alan Comnes; Susan J Mara; Kaufman, Paul; Jeff Dasovich; Steffes, James D.; Rick Shapiro; Scott Govenar
Subject: Secretary of State Bill Jones Calls Transfer of Rate Fixing Authority From the PUC to DWR Unconstitutional

A press release and comments from California Secretary of State Bill Jones regarding the PUC's ratemaking hearing are included below.  These were issued at a Sacramento press conference this morning, and were sent to me by his campaign staff.
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: Darrel Ng <mailto:darrel@billjones.org>
To: ken@kdscommunications.com <mailto:ken@kdscommunications.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:48 AM
Subject: Secretary of State Bill Jones Calls Transfer of Rate Fixing Authority From the PUC to DWR Unconstitutional

BJC:27

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                            CONTACT:    Beth Miller

Wednesday, September 19, 2001                                                                Beth Pendexter

                                                                                Darrel Ng

916/349-2002

Secretary of State Bill Jones Calls Transfer of Rate Fixing Authority From the PUC to DWR Unconstitutional

Transfer Would Eliminate Public Accountability & Oversight Authority of Future Rate Increases

SACRAMENTO - Raising questions about the constitutionality of transferring rate-making authority from the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to the Department of Water Resources (DWR), Secretary of State Bill Jones today expressed his outrage at the prospect of losing all public accountability and oversight of California's electricity rate-setting process.

            The PUC is expected to vote on Thursday, September 20, 2001, to accept a draft decision by Administrative Law Judge Pulsifer that would transfer its ratemaking authority to the DWR.

"Do you really trust - or should anyone trust - Governor Davis setting rates without public oversight?" asked Jones.  "The Governor's record on energy has been abysmal.  He has turned a short-term supply problem into a long-term fiscal crisis.  It would be absolutely wrong and not in the state's best interest to give Gray Davis and the DWR a blank check," said Jones.

AB1X specifies that DWR be entitled to recover the costs of its energy purchases after advising the PUC of the costs.  Most recently, DWR has informed the PUC that their purchases for energy through 2002 will reach $12.6 billion.  If the PUC accepts the draft decision, DWR will now be the state agency making the determination of whether its own purchase costs are "just and reasonable."

            "Pure and simple it's a rate scheme that the PUC must declare unconstitutional.  If the PUC refuses to do so, California risks facing a long period of legal turbulence and uncertainty as a result of the unlawful delegation of powers from the PUC to the DWR," said Jones.

- MORE -

BJC:27:2

"As our state weathers this energy challenge and faces great economic uncertainty with a budget deficit looming in the future, never before has it been so important for the PUC to responsibly perform its vital oversight duties, acting in the best interest of Californians," said former Governor George Deukmejian, who joined Jones and past PUC Commissioner Stan Hulett today in criticizing the pending PUC action.

            As a former California Attorney General, Deukmejian also expressed strong concerns regarding the legality of the PUC's abdication of authority.

            "The PUC's power to review rate increases is a power expressly granted to it in our California Constitution.  The Legislature cannot simply delegate this power to another state agency by passing a simple statute.  This transfer of power can only legally occur if a constitutional amendment is passed and AB1X is not a constitutional amendment," said Deukmejian.

            Former PUC President and Commissioner Stan Hulett also raised serious questions regarding the shift of constitutional responsibilities from the PUC to the DWR.

"Even something as seemingly innocuous as relocating the PUC's headquarters from San Francisco to Sacramento would require a constitutional amendment, according to the opinion we received from former Attorney General John Van de Camp when that issues arose some years ago," Hulett said.  "A shift of responsibility of this magnitude would clearly and unambiguously require a constitutional amendment given the enormity of the proposal."

            Secretary Jones implored the PUC to suspend action on the draft decision until these extraordinary constitutional questions are addressed.

            "California is poised to take a disastrous leap into unconstitutional government.  For all our sakes, and for the future of our state, we must not allow that to happen," said Jones.

- 30 -

Remarks by Secretary of State Bill Jones Regarding the Unconstitutional Transfer of Rate Fixing Authority From the Public Utilities Commission

to the Department of Water Resources

(As Prepared)

Good morning.

Thank you for being here today.  . As you know, tomorrow the California Public Utilities Commission will be voting on an extremely important issue that will affect all Californians for years to come.

The PUC will consider abdicating its ratemaking responsibilities to the Department of Water Resources based upon a draft decision by Administrative Law Judge Pulsifer.

I am here today because I have grave concerns that if the PUC adopts this decision, they will be violating a major provision of California's Constitution.

As California searches for ways to deal with our continuing energy situation it is incumbent upon each of us to examine the ramifications - both short and long term - of every decision we make.  This past weekend the California Legislature chose not to bring legislation affecting the pending bankruptcy of Southern California Edison because many members of the legislature believed that the legislation was severely flawed.

Let's examine for a minute why this issue and vote will be taken tomorrow.  This decision rests wholly on the new rate scheme embodied in Assembly Bill 1X (AB1X.).

Since January of this year, the DWR has purchased electrical power on behalf of cash and credit poor Southern California Edison (SCE), Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) and San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E).  AB1X granted this authority to DWR.

            AB1X specifies that DWR is entitled to recover the cost of these purchases, and that DWR is to advise the PUC of this amount.  DWR has recently estimated that it will require $12.6 billion to cover the costs of power purchased through 2002.

AB1X further stipulates that the PUC will approve rates, designed by DWR and paid by the consumers, to cover DWR's expenditures for its energy purchases. Under the law, as laid out in AB1X, DWR and not the PUC will make the determination as to whether its purchase costs of $12.6 billion are "just and reasonable" under the law.

Pure and simple, it is a scheme that the PUC must declare unconstitutional. If the PUC refuses to do so, California risks facing a long period of legal turbulence and uncertainty as a result of the unlawful delegation of powers from the PUC to the Department of Water Resources.

This is a dramatic and extremely troubling break from the current role of the PUC.  For decades, the PUC has aggressively performed the vital task of oversight, through public hearings, to ensure that rates charged California's electrical energy users are "just and reasonable."  Now, that indispensable oversight authority would be delegated to a bureaucratic state agency, the DWR, with no public oversight and no independent decision making authority.

Do you really trust - or should anyone trust - Governor Davis' setting rates without public oversight?  The Governor's record on energy has been abysmal and he has turned a short-term supply problem into a long-term fiscal crisis.  It would be absolutely wrong and not in the state's interest to give Gray Davis a blank checkbook.

DWR and Gray Davis would become the sole arbiter of whether the cost of their own energy purchases has been "just and reasonable." Through AB1X, the Legislature has diminished the PUC's role so greatly, that its function is to simply allocate shares of the $12.6 billion revenue requirement to the three utilities.

This is a classic case of the fox guarding the hen house - it must not happen.

The PUC must not vote to accept this illegal transfer of authority. The PUC must vigorously defend its role.  It must not allow the Legislature to abolish the crucial role it performs: reviewing the reasonableness of the overall purchase costs before they are passed along to ratepayers.

As I noted earlier, the reimbursement scheme set forth in AB1X is a violation of California's Constitution. The Legislature's attempt to strip public accountability for the reasonableness of rate increases from the PUC and give it to DWR is appalling.  Nowhere in AB1X is it specified what a reasonableness review conducted by DWR will now be.

Will senior officials at DWR and Governor Davis gather at a conference table behind locked doors and declare their own power purchases reasonable?

Will they hold public hearings and subject their expenditures of billions of dollars belonging to the people of California to the scrutiny of the people of California?

            Looking at their track record, the answer is no.

The PUC's power to review rate increases is not merely based on statute.  It is explicitly set out in the California Constitution. This is a very critical distinction. The Legislature cannot transfer or delegate this critical power by a simple statute. It can only be done by constitutional amendment. And AB1X is not a constitutional amendment.

According to California Courts, the PUC "is not an ordinary administrative agency, but a constitutional body with broad legislative and judicial powers." Article XII, section 6, of the California Constitution states the general grant of authority for the PUC to fix rates.

Section 6 provides:

"The commission may fix rates, establish rules, examine records, issue subpoenas, administer oaths, take testimony, punish for contempt, and prescribe a uniform system of accounts for all public utilities subject to its jurisdiction."

Thus, "[t]he Constitution confers broad authority on the commission to regulate utilities, including the power to fix rates, establish rules, hold various types of hearings, award reparation, and establish its own procedures." This is basic California law, reaffirmed time after time by our courts.

These constitutional powers are based firmly on the authority to make factual inquiry into the reasonableness of the rates to be fixed.  In one notable case, PG&E v. Railroad Comm., the federal court reviewed natural gas rates set by the Railroad Commission, predecessor to the PUC.  The court discussed the duties of the ratemaking body to make sure that the rates it fixes be "reasonable."

Because the PUC has the authority to "fix rates," it therefore has a corollary duty to make sure that the rates it fixes are reasonable.

This must mean that there is a constitutional duty and right to examine the costs underlying those rates.  AB1X cannot alter or eliminate that duty.  AB1X also cannot strip the core component of any reasonableness review: the close and open-minded examination of those facts being used to justify a rate increase.

The Legislature cannot deny the PUC these constitutional powers.

By depriving the PUC the authority to examine underlying costs in the exercise of its duty to "fix rates," the Legislature has improperly sought to modify, curtail and abridge the constitutional powers of the PUC.  To that extent, AB1X is invalid and unconstitutional.

            In a startling break with California's past history, AB1X allows DWR to retain title to the energy it purchases and then "resell" it directly to consumers. The utilities then collect the energy costs from their retail customers and return to DWR the portion of the revenues DWR has said it must have as reimbursement.

            By any other name, this is a tax. It is an enormous sum of money being paid out by the people of California.

            According to our courts, the power to set taxes is a legislative function.  DWR is an agency within the executive branch of government.

            The California Constitution specifies that the powers of one branch shall not be exercised by another branch.

The following example highlights the impropriety of the Legislature's delegation of authority to DWR to determine the reasonableness of its own energy purchases.

            The Legislature assesses California's highway and transportation needs and then sets the rate for the gasoline tax. Drivers purchasing gas in California pay the tax, on a cents per gallon basis, whenever they buy gas. The Legislature cannot delegate to CalTrans the authority both to determine its own highway construction budget and to set a gasoline tax rate calculated to fund that budget.

This situation is identical to DWR. The Legislature has directed DWR to purchase power, as it needs, at prices it is willing to pay. The Legislature has further directed the PUC to authorize rates, without any review to determine their reasonableness, in order to reimburse DWR.

The PUC cannot legally - and must not under any circumstances -- abdicate its responsibilities to the people of California.

This is a decision based on the unconstitutional scheme laid out in AB1X, and it's unconscionable for the PUC to vote away its own most precious function: providing accountability for just and reasonable rates for the people of California.

For these reasons, I cannot urge in stronger terms that the PUC take the following actions tomorrow on the draft decision:

1.      Suspend action on the draft decision until the extraordinary constitutional questions are resolved

2.      Seek immediate resolution of these constitutional questions by initiating a lawsuit against the Legislature and the Governor

3.      Adopt regulatory and statutory changes to ensure that public oversight and accountability for just and reasonable rates continues

            California is poised to take a disastrous leap into unconstitutional government.  For all of our sakes, and the future of our state, this must not be allowed to happen.

-# # #-


Ok, by now you think I've lost my mind. I can accept that.

I believe this is the most current version which should form the basis of the
Salmon LLC contract (formerly known as LV Co Gen facility agreement).

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 05:12
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 03/12/2001 04:17:06 PM
To: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com, Bill.Williams@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: tconstan@llgm.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr
oject

Bill/Dale/Kay-

I've made redline edits with regards to LVCII performance guarantee values
in Section 10.7 for output and heat rate based on the Feb 8, 2001 guarantee
sheet.

Dale, please send revised LVC II facility agreement to reflect Units 25-28
with appropriate schedules for price, delivery, payment and termination
schedules at your earliest convenience.

The units 19-20 and 23-24 that are currently reflected in this document will
be left in E-Next (Turbopark).  The schedules for price, delivery, payment
will remain the same for these units.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com [mailto:Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP); Bill.Williams@enron.com;
Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II
project

Bill Williams asked me to forward the attached execution form of the
LM-6000 purchase contract.

The second attachment is to be inserted as Exhibit H-2 in the contract.  I
understand that we received it from GE, and that it is available only in
pdf format.

Thanks.

(See attached file: Training LM6000.pdf)(See attached file: LV Cogen Gas
Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC)

 - LV Cogen Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5_redline031201.DOC


PLEASE TREAT AS CONFIDENTIAL

A source had a meeting today with California state treasurer Phil Angelides.
Here are the main points from their conversation

1. Anglelides Certain that SoCal Will Go Bankrupt

Corroborating our line over the past four months, Anglelides stated with
confidence that SoCal would go bankrupt and that "he was surprised they
hadn't already."  He noted that the only reason they haven't yet is that
"they were too stupid to ring-fence the parent" and that "their two biggest
equity holders were screaming not to do it."

He added that the Davis/SoCal MOU is dead and that all the "Plan B's" are
"speculative" at best.  He also thought that SoCal was being "naive if they
thought they would get a better deal from the legislature than from the
bankruptcy court."

2. Bond Issuance- $12B Not Enough

Angelides conceded that a $12B bond issue would not be enough to buy power
for the summer and that the true costs would probably be $18-24B.   The only
reason they didn't issue more is that Angelides felt that "$12B was all the
market could handle."  The current game plan for bonds assumes an average
peak price for power of $400/MWh, which Angelides said explains the
difference between his estimates and the higher estimates from State
Comptroller's Kathleen Connell's office.

3. New Generator Construction

Anglelides was explicit that the California Public Power Authority
(authorized by the legislature last week) will "build plants and not stop
until we [California] has a 10-15% capacity cushion above expected demand.
Angelides expects the state to be "5-10% short on power all summer."


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

EXPERIENCE THE PEACE SOFTWARE DIFFERENCE.
DISCOVER THE POWER OF SUCCESS.
Peace Software customers are experiencing real, measurable results using
Peace's advanced customer and commodity suite, EnergyTM.
Discover what the world's leading energy providers already know.

Leading energy providers prefer Peace Software. Find out why...at CIS, Booth
#501.

www.usa.peace.com/CIS2001

[IMAGE]

Vice President Cheney recently stated that to meet projected energy demands
the US requires between 1,300 and 1,900 new power plants.  That averages out
to more than one new plant per week, every week, for 20 years running. Learn
about the pivotal role of natural-gas  based generation in solving the US
energy crisis, attend Natural Gas and Power Generation Strategies 2001, June
13-15,Tucson, AZ.

Miss last week? Catch up on the latest deregulation, competition and
restructuring developments in the energy industry with SCIENTECH's
IssuesWatch

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
May 7, 2001

California Update: Duke Energy Proposes Settlement Deal

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE][IMAGE]Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK) approached Calif. Gov. Gray Davis with
a secret deal, now made public, that offered monetary concessions if the
state drops lawsuits and investigations into the company's alleged price
gouging. Duke made the offer in a secret 17-page letter sent in April to Gov.
Davis' office, which the governor confirmed on May 2. Davis' spokesman called
the letter Duke's "wish list," which included having the state call off
investigations of the North Carolina-based generator. Although Gov. Davis has
acknowledged receipt of the proposal, he has not officially accepted or
rejected the offer.

Analysis: Duke's desire to make a settlement with the state of California
stems from an ongoing investigation by FERC that began back in March. At that
time, FERC put 13 California power sellers, including Duke, on notice that
they must either make refunds for certain power sales or provide further
justification for their prices. Duke is considered to be one of four
companies (along with Dynegy, Reliant and Williams) that faces the biggest
potential refunds to the state of California. In fact, Duke reportedly faces
potential refunds of up to $20 million for the power that it has sold to
California since the start of this year.

We can fast forward from FERC's investigation to Duke's "good faith"
settlement offer that now sits before Gov. Gray Davis. The plan sets out
specific action steps for new generation, conservation programs, electric and
gas infrastructure improvements, regional transmission frameworks, and
environmental goals. In addition, Duke has offered an undisclosed settlement
agreement, for which the California government would agree to cease all
ongoing investigations of price manipulation by the company. Duke's
"appropriate payment" is based on fair estimate of the company's alleged
overcharges for power that it sold to the state.

Yet, beyond the spin control surrounding this offer, Duke's proposal amounts
to a mutual back-scratching agreement, with Duke clearly obtaining the
largest benefit. Duke wants the state to drop all pending lawsuits that
allege price gouging and tone down the negative public comments against Duke
made by the governor and others. In return, Duke will refund to the state
some of the money that it allegedly owes and will further assist in helping
the state with its power supply needs. However, under the offer Duke will
admit no wrongdoing. Rather, the company's proposal is being presented as an
altruistic effort to assist in the resolution of California's flawed market.
Neither Duke nor Gov. Davis has disclosed the monetary amount of Duke's
settlement offer, but it is fairly safe to assume that it is only a fraction
of the $20 million that the state wants.

Other specifics within Duke's proposal that are important to note include the
company's "commitment to work with the state to get 680 MW of additional
peaking capacity ready for summer 2002." In addition, Duke has offered to
enter into long-term contracts with the state on "reasonable terms" and also
"attempt to secure other reasonably priced electricity for the state."
Perhaps eliciting the greatest response within the industry is Duke's pledge
to "share the financial pain" of California's troubled market with other
market participants.

Presently, Duke supplies about 5 percent of California's power needs, the
majority of which is based on long-term contracts. This is a significant
point because Duke has argued that its participation in the California market
is not as entrenched in the volatile spot market, in contrast to many of the
other power suppliers under FERC's investigation. The company also owns the
Moss Landing plant, located south of San Jose, Calif., which it is upgrading
with a $500 million investment. Duke has established that the plant should be
able to provide approximately 30 percent of California's new generation in
2002.

While Duke downplays the role that California has played in its profits, the
company's total wholesale profits soared 374 percent to $744 million for
year-end 2000. For the year, Duke's California power plants generated 70
percent more electricity than they did in 1999. In addition, in 2000 the
plants provided 17 million megawatt hours of electricity to the state's power
grid versus 9.5 million the previous year.

Further, in January and February 2001, Duke charged more for power through
"credit premiums," which were levied because of the risk of non-payment
associated with California's financially struggling utilities. Duke claims
that it is still owed about $100 million by the Department of Water
Resources, California's power purchaser.

Duke is not the only company forging settlement contracts with California. On
May 2, Tulsa-based Williams Co. (also one of the top four companies
reportedly owing the most to California) announced that it has agreed to pay
$8 million to the California ISO to end FERC's investigation into whether the
company's plants were kept offline to drive up prices. For several months,
FERC has been investigating Williams regarding the company's alleged shutdown
of two power generation units owned by AES, which reportedly allowed Williams
to sell power from other units at higher prices. The stipulation and consent
agreement reached between Williams and FERC identified no improprieties. In
other words, Williams has made the payment but has admitted to no wrongdoing
or price manipulation. A Williams spokesperson has said that the $8 million
will be deducted from the $252 million that Williams is still owed for power
sales to the California ISO and the California PX.

Much like Duke, Williams has reported stellar profits over the last year. For
year-end 2000, the company reported unaudited income from continuing
operations of $873.2 million, or $1.95 per share on a diluted basis, versus
$178 million, or 40 cents per share on a restated basis, for 1999. In
addition, the company reported 1Q 2001 unaudited results that were more than
double that of 1Q 2000-$378 million, or 78 cents per share, compared with a
restated $139 million, or 31 cents per share.

Moreover, the offers that Williams and Duke are forging with the state of
California are probably only a small portion of what both companies have made
from power sales to the state. However, one benefit of the deals is that they
would keep the parties out of years of expensive litigation. Yet, at least as
of this writing, Gov. Davis remains less than enthused about Duke's offer and
has not eased off from his accusation that Duke (along with the other power
generators) has "bilked millions of dollars from California consumers." In
fact, although the governor has said that he is willing to continue
negotiations with the various power generators, he has also vowed "not to
call off the dogs" in the state and federal investigation of any price
gouging. Toward that end, the state's lieutenant governor has initiated a
class-action suit on behalf of California consumers against Duke and other
power generators accused of price fixing. This legal claim follows similar
suits initiated by the city of San Francisco and lawyers in San Diego. All of
the suits basically claim the same thing, that Duke and four other power
generators engaged in unlawful trading practices-such as shutting down
plants-to drive up market prices in California.

Duke, of course, maintains its innocence and says that the new lawsuit merely
makes the same old claim that the company has repeatedly denied.
Nevertheless, Duke has made a monetary offer to the state of California,
which could be driven merely by the desire to avoid lengthy legal proceedings
or by a concern that some wrongdoing on the company's part could eventually
be determined. The stakes have also been raised with some California
attorneys suggesting that any generators found to have engaged in price
gouging should face civil and criminal penalties, which could include
incarceration for any executive at the company who knowingly allowed the
price manipulation to take place. Consequently, despite Duke's offer and any
other proposals that subsequently come from power generators, it appears that
litigation over the price gouging matter is unavoidable.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


-----Original Message-----
From: jbrewer.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com [mailto:jbrewer.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:11 AM
To: chenson.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; bshook.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; jswank.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; dgonzale.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; plucci@enron.com
Subject: Fw: Weakest Link

ratelove@ev1.net
11/12/2001 05:59 PM PST
Please respond to ratelove

To: jbrewer@leathercenter.com
cc:
bcc:
Subject: Fw: Weakest Link

----- Original Message -----
From: Beth Love
To: beth
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 3:55 PM
Subject: Weakest Link

 The Weakest link'
 ..

 Are you the weakest link???

 I am going to ask you three questions.

 And you have to answer them instantly.

 You can't take your time.

 You have to answer immediately.

 O.K.?  Don't  cheat.

 Let's find out just how clever you really are

 ........... ........

 Ready?

 ..

 GO !!!!!

 ..

 First Question

 ..

 You are participating in a race. You overtake the second place runner.

 What position do you finish?

 ...

 NOW! See the answer below..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 Answer

 ..

 If you answered that you finish first, you are absolutely wrong!!!

 Why? Because when you overtake the second place runner and

 you take his place, you finish in second place!!

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 To answer the second question, don't take as much time as you

 took for the first question.

 ..

 ..

 Second Question:   If you overtake the last runner then you arrive...?

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 Answer: If you answer that you arrived second to last, you are wrong
again.

                   Tell me, how can you overtake the LAST runner !!!!

                   The question is wrong!

                You're not very good at this are you???

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 Third Question

 ..

 Subject: *Very, very tricky math!

 Note:   This riddle must be done IN YOUR HEAD ONLY

                and NOT using paper and a pen.

 ..

 Try it.

 ..

 Take 1000 and add 40 to it.

 Now add another 1000.

 Now add 30.

 Add another 1000.

 Now add 20.

 Now add another 1000.

 Now add 10.

 ..

 What is the total? (scroll down for answer)

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 ..

 Did you get 5000?

 ..

 The correct answer is actually 4100.

 ..

 Don't believe it? Check it with your calculator!

 ..

 The decimal sequence confuses our brain that always jumps to the

 highest decimals (100s instead of 10s).

 ..

 This should have you in a bad mood for the rest of the day!!!

 ..

 You are the weakest link. Goodbye.

 ..


Have I told you how wonderful you are?  I actually the Gas Daily prices for
every day.  If you could just enter them in Column S I would be so gratefull.


Tentative Schedule of the talks at SIAM

?

?

April 27, 2001?????????????? ??????????????????????? ??????????? ???????????
April 28, 2001

??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????
??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????

8:45 ) 9:00?? ??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????
??????????? 9:00 ) 12:15

Welcoming Remarks??????? ??????????????????????? ??????????? ???????????
Imaging & Inverse Problems in

??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????
??????????? ??????????? Geophysics

9:00 ) 10:30

Arthur Vailas ) Environmental Modeling????? ??????????? ??????????? Kurt
Marfurt

??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????
???????????????????????

Jason Ching? ??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????
??????????? William Symes

?

Richard Kendall?????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????
??????????? 10:30 ) 10:45? Coffee Break

?

10:30 ) 10:45? Coffee Break??????????????????????? ??????????? Arthur Weglein

?

10:45 ) 12:15????????????? ??????????????????????? ??????????? ???????????
Jacques Tabanou

Reservoir Simulation

??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????
??????????? ??????????? Lunch 12:15

Stephen Lyons

??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????
??????????? ??????????? 1:30 ) 3:00 ??

Amr El Bakry??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????
??????????? Information Technology

??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????
???????????

Lunch 12:00 noon????????????? ??????????????????????? ??????????? ???????????
David Archer

?

1:30 ) 3:00?? ??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????
??????????? T. Lasseter

Modeling Energy Markets

??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????
??????????? ??????????? 3:00 ) 3:15? Coffee Break

Pablo Padilla

??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????
??????????? ??????????? 3:15 ) 5:00

Vince Kaminski??????????? Workshop on Industrial Mathematics Programs

?

3:00 ) 3:15? Coffee Break??????????????????????? ??????????? ???????????
Samuel Rankin

???????????????????????

3:45 ) 4:00 ? ??????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ???????????
??????????? Panel

P. Percell

?

4:00 ) 5:30

Session on Industrial Intern Programs

?

Fadil Santosa

?

Panel


If you cannot read this email, please click here .

Earnings.com - AMGN Earnings Detail
Earnings.com 	[IMAGE]
	  Amgen Inc.(AMGN)              [IMAGE] View Today's Earnings Announcements        Earnings Date Upcoming Announcement October 25, 2001  BEFORE MARKET    Add This Event To My Calendar    Upcoming Conference Call October 25, 2001 5:00PM [IMAGE]  Add This Event To My Calendar  Last Conference Call July 26, 2001 5:00PM Click To Listen       Last Earnings Headline    October 18, 2001 4:11 PM - Amgen Announces Webcast of Third-Quarter 2001 Earnings  - BUSINESS WIRE  Note: All times are Eastern Standard Time (EST)     Consensus EPS Estimate This Qtr Jun 2001 Next Qtr Sep 2001 This Fiscal Year Dec 2001 Next Fiscal Year Dec 2002 Avg Estimatem (mean) $0.28 $0.30 $1.17 $1.41 # of Estimates 22 20 24 24 Low Estimate $0.25 $0.27 $1.13 $1.26 High Estimate $0.29 $0.32 $1.19 $1.58 Year Ago EPS $0.28 $0.29 $1.05 $1.17 EPS Growth 0.81% 2.41% 11.63% 20.33%    Quarterly Earnings Mar 2001 Dec 2000 Sep 2000 Jun 2000 Mar 2000 Estimate EPS $0.27 $0.25 $0.27 $0.27 $0.25 Actual EPS $0.28 $0.24 $0.29 $0.28 $0.25 Difference $0.01 -$0.01 $0.02 $0.01 $0.00 % Surprise 3.70% -4.00% 7.41% 3.70% 0.00%    Earnings Growth Last 5 Years This Fiscal Year Next Fiscal Year Ave Est Next 5 Years P/E (FY 2001) PEG Ratio AMGN Industry Rank: 85 of 160 16.50% 11.63% 20.33% 20.02% 48.77 2.44 INDUSTRY  MED-BIOMED/GEN 29.30% 11.30% 26.70% 34.80% 1.07 1.65 SECTOR MEDICAL              -28.68% 4.98% 75.85% 25.66% -5.56 0.45 S&P 500 8.40% -4.20% 14.60% 17.00% 22.15 1.31    Long-term Growth Avg Est High Est Low Est Estimates AMGN  20.02%  30.30%  15.00%  13      Covering Analysts:   View History     A.G. Edwards   ABN AMRO   Argus Research   Banc of America   CIBC World Markets   CSFB   Chase H&Q   Crowell, Weedon   Cruttenden Roth   Dain Rauscher Wessels   Dakin Securities   Deutsche Bank   Edward D. Jones   First Union Capital   Goldman Sachs   Leerink Swann   Legg Mason   Lehman Brothers   Merrill Lynch   Morgan Stanley, DW   Olde Discount   Pershing   Prudential Securities   Robertson Stephens   S G Cowen   Salomon Smith Barney   Warburg Dillon Reed    Zacks All research data provided by  Zacks Investment Research.    Net EarningsEarnings data provided by  Net Earnings Corporation , the leading provider of future financial information and calendars.

? 1999-2001 Earnings.com, Inc., All rights reserved about us  | contact us  |  webmaster  | site map  privacy policy  | terms of service


Name  Supervisor   Title  Start date

Michael Mousteiko  (Lisa Peterson)   Spec  7/31
Julie Boehl   (Kathy Kelly)    Spec  7/31
Susan Elledge   (Linda Bryan)    Spec  7/31
Natalie Baker   (Carrie Hollomon)   SrSpec  8/1
 Lia Hernandez   (EdTerry)   SrSpec  8/2
Kevin Brady   (George Smith)    Staff  8/3


Attached is my suggested language.  The confirms already provide for Market
Quotation and Second Method; the Optional Early Termination provision should
be the only exception for using the Calculation Agent for termination
purposes.  Of course, the Calculation Agent will determine AECO prices for
payment purposes, but that is not related to termination.

Please call.  713-853-5620.  Sara


The house thing is a tough call.  It's hard to say.   If you're not in any
hurry to buy, the summer should give
you a good indication of continuing energy problems.  I personally think that
the problem will come and go
for a while, but a lot depends on how California's legislature deals with the
situation.  I have no idea what
they'll end up doing - they've acted pretty poorly already.

What's your time frame on a house?  If you're only concern is that prices are
at their highest level in the last
decade, I wouldn't worry too much about that.  It's impossible to time the
market -  who would've thought
San Francisco's housing prices would be at these current levels.   There are
also a lot of intangibles associated
with home ownership as your aware of.

I would be concerned about the energy situation, so just try to keep abreast
of it.  Also, you could call me if you
have any questions.  I'll try to help the best I can.  Take care and tell Kim
and Kendall I said hi.

Kevin

BriLowery@aol.com on 01/22/2001 10:48:39 PM
To: Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Everythings Big in Texas?

Chump!
This energy crisis is making me question  my timing on buying a house.  I'm
thinking if the economy tanks the housing prices will dip a little.  They
just crack the highs of 1989 this last two years.  Any opinions?

I start my Texas travel in February.  I'll be in Dallas for the first full
week and back in March in Dallas again.  Starting the end of March I'll be
there almost every week for about 6 months.  You'll be seeing more of me than
you want.  When we get closer to March I'll give you a buzz to set up some
dates.
Sorry about the Kendall picture, I'll try again.

Take care, B


You de MAN


Sandy, need to discuss this w/ you ASAP.  No answer on your cell phone.  Can
you please page me at 888-766-4103 or call at 713-853-5676.  Thanx.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Letke/DUB/EES on 03/20/2001 02:46 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Marty Sunde                           03/20/2001 09:25 AM
	Phone No: 713 853-7797 Phone
  888-953-9478 SkyTel Pager
  EB 889

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Jeff and Eric,
I have NO problem trying to get letters for support of Direct Access.  Eric,
if we can get those to support Jeff and Sandi, this is wonderful.

Also, I had asked Eric to check with Alpert's office to register our follow
on phone number and offer to try to correct the aggravated customers.  Eric,
if you can provide a status on all of these as you make progress, that's
appreciated.
---------------------- Forwarded by Marty Sunde/HOU/EES on 03/20/2001 09:13
AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/19/2001 07:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Messick/EFS/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Marty:  Thanks for the information.

Getting Eric's contact information to Alpert's office is in motion.
Regarding attempt to follow-up with those who called Alpert's office to
complain, I wasn't clear on that action.  Likely makes sense for Eric to
coordinate with Sandi to make the contact with Alpert's office.
Letters are an attempt to influence Alpert to 1) fix the Direct Access
prohibition and 2) ensure that DA customers don't get saddled with the DWR
costs.

Let me know if this approach works.

Best,
Jeff

	Marty Sunde@EES
	03/19/2001 07:02 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Messick/EFS/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

All I asked Eric to do was:
ensure that there was an Enron contact if another complaint came in.
find out from Alpert's office if we could call back a few of those who called
to complain to find out what they perceived, correct the misperception,
apologize.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/19/2001 04:20 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, hgovenar@govadv.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, MDay@GMSSR.com, ken@kdscommunications.com, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Thanks, Scott.

Scott/Hedy/Sandi/Bev:  Erik Letke heads up the retail marketing effort
underway in San Diego.  Marty Sunde wants Alpert to have an EES commercial
contact that she can talk to in the event she has further questions, etc.,
He'd like Erki to be the contact person.  Erik could you copy your vitals
(title, contact info) to Scott and Hedy Govenar and Sandi McCubbin so they
can forward along to Alpert?

Erik, seems that it would be useful if the customer letters to Alpert could
make the following points (folks please weigh in and add/subtract/modify if
needed):

The customer's glad to have had the option to take Direct Access service from
Enron because having the opportunity to take advantage of the offer has made
the customer better off.
Direct Access is an extremely important option that customers need, want and
should have going forward.
Any "solution" that the Legislature comes up with must therefore include the
continuation of Direct Access for all customers.
As such, the Legislature should immediately fix AB 1X to make sure that
Direct Access remains a permanent fixture of California's energy strategy.
Direct Access customers should not be forced to pay for DWR's power purchase
costs, since Direct Access customers aren't benefitting from those purchases.

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	03/19/2001 04:01 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dede

As discussed, customers should send letters to Dede as follows:

The Honrable Dede Alpert
California State Senate
State Capitol, Room 5050
Sacramento, CA 95814

Interested companies should copy:  "Honorable Members of the California
State Legislature" and fax or mail me a copy for further distribution.
My fax is (916) 448-0816 and my address is 1127 11th Street, Suite #400,
Sacramento, CA 95814.

Scott


<meta http-equiv=Content-Language content=en-us><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"><meta name=GENERATOR content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0"><meta name=ProgId content=FrontPage.Editor.Document><title>BE DEBT FREE</title>
Are you sick of having to pay high interest rates on
 your existing loans or credit cards?

Do you have too much month at the end of the money?

Now you can "regardless of your past credit history"
"  Cut your monthly payments by 50% or more!
"  Reduce your credit card debt by up to 60%!
"  Slash your interest rates down to [as low as] zero!
"  Keep More Cash every month!
"  Stop creditors from harassing you now!
"  Much Much More...
NO OBLIGATION " FREE CONSULTATION " STRICT PRIVACY

EVERYONE QUALIFIES. This is not a loan program

CLICK HERE for the facts and start saving money NOW!

We strongly oppose the use of SPAM email and do not want anyone who does not wish
 to receive our mailings to receive them. As a result, we have retained the services of an
 independent 3rd party to administer our list management and remove list (http://www.removeyou.com/).


You will provide Tana and I with the Canadian conversion language for the
Canada public Raptor deals.  Thanks!


[IMAGE] Maybe Gray Davis can teach you how the markets work [IMAGE]

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


For West:
Risk(give these people access to all regions)-
Phillip Love
Randy Bhatia
Melissa Videtto
Stephanie Hopkins
Ryan O'Rourke
Zach McCarroll

Traders(just West access)-
Mike Grigsby
Phillip Allen
Keith Holst
Frank Ermis
Jay Reitmeyer
Jane Tholt
Matt Lenhart
Jason Wolfe
Matt Smith

I will have Patti Sullivan from logistics send you her list.  Thanks.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Severson, Russ
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:05 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Palmer, B. Scott; Winfree, O'Neal D.
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	Netco Sitara Access

Security access for the "Estate" will be the same as Production currently is.
Access for "Netco" will have to be set up from scratch.
Can each of you give me a list of the people that should have access to  "Netco".
Access is still preliminarily being set up on a West, East, Central and Texas regional basis.
Included in the list should be Risk, Logistics, Trading and anyone else that you know of that you want to have access to your region..

The plan is to have a large mass set up,  additional updates will be handled under eRequest, under the new application region code "Houston - Netco"
(This name will be changed later)

Any questions or comments, please give me a call.

Russ
x37386


Hi

     I guess this is a case of be careful of what you ask for!  Since you
helped me last week delete all products except physical gas from the All
Products
section of stack manager ,  I can no longer select a financial swap product
as a link to my physical products.  For example, I would like to link my
HEHUB physical
rest of month product to the gas daily HEHUB swap product.  Can you help me
once again or refer me to someone who can?  Sorry, I did not realize these
options were connected.

                                      Thanks in advance for your help!


Attached is a spread sheet that can be used to calculate our exposure for the
month of MAY.

Notes:

I do not have Yazoo's load so I used 80% of Clarksdale as a proxy.

I created a energy model that used a 10.5 heat rate and $5.20 gas.

The SEPA energy was not included and no cost for startups.

Looks like worst case we would be exposed for roughly One Million for May.

I can refine the model more if required.