Jim, do you have the call-in info on this?  I should probably catch up with what is going on.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Fri 9/7/2001 1:01 AM
To: 'mday@gmssr.com'; 'jklauber@llg.com'; Mara, Susan; Sharp, Vicki; Sanders, Richard B.; Williams, Robert C.; Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:
Subject: FW: Direct Access Petition

For our call set for 3 pm CDT
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Duncan [mailto:EDuncan2@ArterHadden.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:03 PM
To: smara@enron.com
Cc: douglass@energyattorney.com
Subject: Direct Access Petition

Attached please find the draft Petition for Writ of Review before the California Supreme Court.  We are currently working on the Memorandum of Points and Authorities and anticipate sending a draft sometime tomorrow morning.  The Petition is based on the assumption that the Commission will adopt an order with retroactive application.  If the Commissions issues an Order consistent with the draft Interim Decision published today, then retroactivity will not be an issue and there wll be no need to seek judicial relief (at least on that ground).

Enron Energy Services, Inc., is named as the Petitioner.  I am uncertain, however, whether this is the correct name or entity.

The Petition must be filed in the Supreme Court because the Legislature conferred exclusive and original jurisdiction on it when Public Utilities Code section 1768 was enacted.  The Petition does not  address the timeliness of the request for Supreme Court review.  Generally, all administrative remedies must be exhausted before a Petition is timely and Section 1768 appears to require that an application for rehearing be denied before a Petition can be filed.  Since there will undoubtedly be an argument that the Petition is premature because there has been no application for a rehearing, the Points and Authorities (and probably the Petition) will discuss the timeliness of the Petition.  The exceptions to the exhaustion doctrine should control making the Petition timely.

Dan Douglass and I will be available for your 1 p.m. conference call.  If you need to reach me at any time my office number is (818) 596-2291, my cell number is (805) 796-2198, and my Email address is eduncan2@arterhadden.com <mailto:eduncan2@arterhadden.com>.  EWD


Deal 135714 is active through Oct 2000.  The volume on the ticket is zero, so
the nom was probably never sent to POPS.

D

Clem Cernosek
12/28/2000 04:27 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL Meter #984179 HOFF-HELLER UNIT #22 CDP

Daren:

During the period of 9/1/2000 through 9/13/2000, the above meter has recorded
flow on the following days:

 Days     Mmbtus

 9/1/2000            4,873
 9/2/2000            4,968
 9/3/2000            4,970
 9/4/2000            4,816
 9/5/2000            5,039
 9/6/2000            4,971
 9/7/2000            4,971
 9/8/2000            1,419
 9/13/2000                  58

            36,085

Deal #135714 was at this meter, but the contract tied to this deal expired at
the end of August 2000.   Currently, these volumes are being booked to the
HPL Strangers Gas Contract.  Logistics need either (1) Purchase Contract
#96008903 tied to Deal #135714 extended, (2) new deal & contract, or (3)
approval to write-off these volumes to Unaccounted for Gas.  (Please print,
sign, and return original to Clem Cernosek).

 _______________________________________________________________
 Deal/Deal Ticket#/Customer (Seller/Buyer)/Purchase Contract

     OR

 _________________________________________________________
 APPROVAL to Write-off the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss

Thanks, Clem


ddeveny@txuenergy.com

dave would love to see cv from you


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/01/2001 04:49
PM ---------------------------

VIKKI ANAYA <vanaya_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 06/01/2001 04:45:30 PM
To: KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM
cc:

Subject:

                                          AGENT VA/VA BOOKING REF
YZEY2A

                                          MANN/C KAY

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  ATTN KAY MANN X 57566

  DATE:  JUN 01 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  04JUN HOUSTON TX     MEMPHIS TN     745A    930A
CO 4096    Y          MON   G.BUSH INTERCO MEMPHIS INTL
                            TERMINAL B
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:45 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER EMB 145
                            SEAT 11C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MANN/C KAY

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  04JUN MEMPHIS TN     HOUSTON TX     555P    740P
CO 3841    Y          MON   MEMPHIS INTL   G.BUSH INTERCO
                                           TERMINAL B
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:45 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER EMB 145
                            SEAT 12C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MANN/C KAY

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/JR33G1

MANN/C KAY                               TICKET:CO/ETKT 005 7029446540

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


you are killing me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

whatever, I understand your embarrasment in getting caught

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

will you get it in your little skull that this time it was a guy.  that's why i immediately asked you.  and how would you know if i was staring, which i wasn't, unless you were?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:45 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

would you stop lying about the guy, Im not going to hold it against you for staring

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i think that you want the male looker to come

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

just you baby

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Can i bring your male admirer?


Rhonda Denton has just informed me that all deals according to Michele
Chalmers with Pinnacle West  should be traded with the counterparty as
Pinnacle West not Arizona Public Service.  No deals should be under Arizona
Public just because Bloomberg is having problems or what ever re-doing the
contract.

From this day forward please tell all our guys to please choose Pinnacle West
not Arizona regardless of what Bloomberg says.  If they have any questions
please have them contact Rhonda Denton at 853-5871 or Michele
Chalmers(Pinnacle West) at 602-250-3824.

Thanks!
Evelyn


Did I follow up with you verbally on this?  K.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:32 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	FW: EDG and Red Cedar

Kim - Is there a particular person in PA I should talk to about this?  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Faucheaux, Eric
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 12:00 PM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Cc:	Watson, Kimberly; Gottsponer, Morgan
Subject:	RE: EDG and Red Cedar

The work is completed and the project is closed.  The figures that I saw indicated that the project was under budget where Red Cedar might be receiving some change.  I think after a job has been closed and 180 days has passed then Property Accounting is the group responsible for handling the invoicing business that you are inquiring about.  Check with Kim Watson in this regard, she is currently working with some claim issues concerning the Calpine interconnect.  Perhaps she can direct you with the process.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Faucheaux, Eric
Subject:	FW: EDG and Red Cedar

Eric - Could you please check with Earl on my Red Cedar question?  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Faucheaux, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:37 AM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Cc:	Matthews, Ron; Gottsponer, Morgan
Subject:	RE: EDG and Red Cedar

What's your schedule on the EDG business?  I would recommend Ron, at this point.  EF

I have figures on the second part that needs to verified by Earl Chanley to be certain all costs have been submitted.  Earl has been on vacation last week and returned yesterday.  I am sure he has been getting caught up and I await his reply.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Faucheaux, Eric
Subject:	FW: EDG and Red Cedar

Eric - What is the status of my request?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 2:21 PM
To:	Faucheaux, Eric
Subject:	EDG and Red Cedar

Eric - I am working with a company called Energy Development Group which is proposing to build power plants along TW's pipeline.  I have spent several telephone sessions with them trying to help them understand exactly where TW's line runs in certain areas of New Mexico and Arizona.  At this point in time I need some assistance from Facility Planning in order to more specifically identify the areas EDG is concerned with.  Would you please let me know who I can work with on this one?

Also, earlier this year, TW constructed a new receipt point in the La Plata station yard for Red Cedar.  Red Cedar paid TW $450,000 for the new point stating that "If the actual costs of constructing the new interconnect is less than $450,000, Red Cedar shall be entitled to a credit in the amount of the difference between $450,000 and the actual cost."  Please let me know what the actual cost of the new facilities ended up being.  Thanks.

Lorraine


She has a mostly white one - at least those are the color of the kitty hairs
on my clothes.  She left his front claws in because she said it was mean to
take them out.  Of course she gets a little angry when he sharpens his claws
on the couch.  I figure he will get run over by a car someday and she will be
said - I will be sensitive and caring and then she'll get another one.

I guess I don't have to tell you that those long distance relationships are
kinda tough.  Good luck.

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 03:37:45 PM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: How's your back???

What kind of kitty does Ingrid have??

Rob is fine... we had a little tiff and didn't talk for a week. He went to
the LDC forum in Boston. We made up over e-mail today... or at least
exchanged apologies. I'm not sure when I'll see him again. Gloria is
visiting me next weekend... girls night out. The following weekend Cindy is
visiting me. The weekend after that I'll be in Houston for TCO shipper
meeting. It has been two weeks since I've seen him. We have a great time
when we are together, it just hasn't been very often latetly.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 4:28 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: RE: How's your back???

I'll ask my woman her opinion about my rock hard stomach.  I'm sure she
will agree after I tell her what to see.  I guess women can be sensitive.

Ingrid's fine - and you?  How's your man?

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 02:47:42 PM

To:   "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: How's your back???

My last response didn't make sense... now that I re-read it. I meant to see
I like a cat personality better.

I'm sorry about the cushy remark... I'm guessing you have worked out a
lot... since I last saw you. It's probably rock hard now.

So how is ingrid??

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 2:14 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: RE: How's your back???

You like (cat) attitude don't you?  And what makes you think my stomach is
cushy??????

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 12:58:44 PM

To:   "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: How's your back???

I'm guessing your stomach is nice and cushy.... not rock hard. Your
women...
ingrid???

I'm not getting a hamster!!! They have no personality like a cat.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:56 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: RE: How's your back???

Why don't you get a hamster or something like that.   You know my woman has
a cat - he likes sleeping on my firm, rockhard stomach when I watch TV.

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 12:41:55 PM

To:   "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: How's your back???

I planted 50 plus flowers this weekend in my flower boxes. They look so
pretty. I hope I don't kill them. I'm going to find me some kittens in the
next few weeks. I'm lonely without Miss Muffy. Cindy Vachuska is coming to
visit me in two weekends. I'm taking May 4th off.. we are going to do some
museums, day to the eastern shore, and baltimore's inner harbor.

Bidweek is such a joy!!! We are suppose to be back online with y'all... so
they say.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:31 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: Re: How's your back???

How sweet.  Its doing ok.  A better question is "how's the lovelife?".
That's doing ok too - although I wish I could find the perfect woman.  Mine
is wanting to take some trips - Maine, New York, EUROPE!!!!!

What's up with you girl?

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 12:13:11 PM

To:   "'Chris Germany'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  How's your back???

See.... I'm being nice and not asking any other questions.

Hope you're doing okay.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


good luck.  please acquire food.


Dear Jeffrey K., Dear (Name):
I regret that you were not able to join us on Ventaso's web seminar about bringing your brand to the point of sale. We would like to invite you to view the web session at your leisure.

During this session, Mark Izumi, Vice President of Marketing and Corporate Communication at Fujitsu, talked about selecting Ventaso's solution for building brand equity through direct and indirect sales channels.
Ventaso's business is increasing your revenues by making your sales and marketing organizations more effective. That is why our customers, including Mark, look to us to provide a marketing platform that provides a quick and measurable ROI by increasing sales effectiveness in a 1-to-1 selling environment.
Over time we have developed a marketing methodology based on best practices that helps you craft value messaging to support the solution sell. Our technology enables your sales channels to personalize that messaging - building a business case for each customer's unique buying criteria.
Our goal at Ventaso is to help you stay ahead of the competition by increasing revenue from all sales channels and enhancing the impact of your brand message at the point of sale.
We look forward to the opportunity to learn more about your challenges and demonstrate how the Ventaso Solution addresses your unique situation.
Sincerely,
Joe Terry
Vice President, Sales and Marketing
Ventaso, Inc.
P.S. To view Ventaso's web session on brand management, we invite you to log in anytime.


I would like to get access to the new westpower website.  Phillip Allen asked
me to contact you for access.  I work with Phillip on the west gas desk.  I
can be reached at 713-853-7031.  Thank you.

Mike Grigsby


All,
I have included an outline of the move for this weekend, we will commence approx 2:00pm Friday when the power tading market closes. We need everyone (except the 24x7 groups & office of the chair) to be off the phones by 6:00pm. These times have been agreed with the department heads and we will be flexible where necessary upto 6:00pm

We will open the floors between 2:00pm & 5:00pm on Sunday, for the following groups to come in and test their systems and telephones, the users are being selected by the heads of departments and we have support staff on-hand to deal with problems and questions.
25 Gas traders / admins
25 Power traders / admins
10 Gas back office /admins
10 Power back office / admins
Office of the chair and admin staff

Business contingency and fall back positions will be in-place on Sunday

if you need any more information, please call me or pass the requests on via Tammy Shepperd

Martin Bucknell - 713 853 1800

<Embedded Microsoft Word Document>


Holly,
I was out sick one Monday, but I think it was Oct. 15, not this pay period.  All other hours are regular.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Holly
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 1:16 PM
To:	Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Cook, Mary; Farrell, Keegan; Gonzalez, Esmeralda; Greenberg, Mark; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Jacobson, Kimberley; Jones, Tana; Keiser, Holly; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson, Cheryl; Panus, Stephanie; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Spencer, Becky; St. Clair, Carol; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	Timesheets due

Time sheets for pay period October 16-31 will be due on Wednesday, October 31.  Please forward me your exception time.

Thanks!

Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


for the estate goofy.  have i told you how much i like the estate?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:11 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

what do you mean

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:45 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

k.  guess who's book i get to start running....yours and mr. smiley zipper face!!  :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:41 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i just got out of a meeting, i wont stand you up, around 11:30

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:34 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i would feel privledged to go to lunch with you tomorrow sir.  that is if you aren't going to stand me up!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:22 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i dont know i have been away three of the last four weekends, why dont we go out for lunch tomorrow

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:20 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

um excuse me sir, but i think that you stood me up twice and you never call me back.  so i just decided to stop being part of your enterage.  wade and i are trying to work through things, but i guess that we are getting along a little better.  we have one more hole in our wall and i haven't broken any phones lately so i guess that is a good sign.  we still have a long way to go.  so why haven't i heard from you little one?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:14 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i do but i havent heard from you either, how are things with wade

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:11 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

nope.  i am in the old building on the 32nd floor.  i think that is where we all used to be.  it is depressing over here.  and we are actually having to work.  i miss being over there.  so, why don't you talk to me anymore?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i cant figure that out yet, are you still on the 5th floor

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

not much.  just over here working on the estate, which is so much fun!  how about you?  do you think that you are going to like ubs?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:54 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

we are so so, what have you been up to, i was in the cafeteria,

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:34 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

were you in the cafeteria earlier?  i thought that i saw you, but it was from far away.  how are you and sarah doing?


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 02:39 PM -----

	Shari Stack
	03/13/2001 06:04 PM

		 To: Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Power Spread Long Description

Kevin- I apologize for not getting back with you on this. I don't know if you
know but I have resigned from Enron and have only a few days left. I am
swamped with a lot of other work and I have asked my boss, Elizabeth Sager,
to appoint a new atty to handle EOL matters (until Leslie Hansen returns).

She can be reached on x36349.

Thanks,

Shari Stack
Enron North America, Legal Department
Tel: (713) 853-9477

	Kevin Meredith@ENRON
	03/09/2001 10:52 AM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Power Spread Long Description

Please review the following attachment containing the proposed long
description for the Physical Power Spread requested by Sean Crandall.  Sean
has reviewed and approved the language for use on his product.  I will be
setting this product up for testing once I receive word back from you.

Thank you.
Kevin


Ed,

Thursday works for  me. What about 10:30  my time?

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/30/2000 02:43:00 PM
Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>
To: "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

how about Thursday, July 6?

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 3:29 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski
Subject: RE: Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

Ed,

A correction. I shall spend an entire day at PRC (performance review)
on Friday, July 7. Can we do on another day

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/30/2000 12:40:59 PM

Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>

To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

I'll still be here in Boston so we'd do it over the phone. OK?

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 12:11 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski
Subject: Re: Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

Ed,

Will you be in Houston on that day or we shall do it over the phone?

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/30/2000 09:13:04 AM

Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>

To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   "Jeffrey Shorter \(E-mail\)" <jshorter@wsicorp.com>
Subject:  Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

Vince,

How about a pre-meeting web site cruise on Friday, July 7 at 11AM EDT?

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 9:52 AM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski
Subject: RE: Next visit to Houston

Ed,

July 12, 2:30 it is. I would like the pre-meeting site cruise.
How can we arrange it?

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/30/2000 04:00:53 AM

Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>

To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   "Jeffrey Shorter \(E-mail\)" <jshorter@wsicorp.com>
Subject:  RE: Next visit to Houston

Vince,

We're all set for 2:30 on July 12. How about a pre-meeting web site cruise
on Friday, July 7 at 11AM EDT?

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 5:04 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski; Shirley Crenshaw
Subject: RE: Next visit to Houston

Ed,

Wednesday, July 12, 2:300 will work for me.

I shall be glad to review your website --
www.weathereffects.com. I shall invite some
people who work on electricity in
my group to join me.

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/29/2000 03:53:40 PM

Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>

To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   "Jeffrey Shorter \(E-mail\)" <jshorter@wsicorp.com>
Subject:  RE: Next visit to Houston

Vince,

Good to hear from you and I'm glad you're available. How is Wednesday at
2:30?

I did look at EOL and am not surprised to see its quality. I was unable to
say much about it in my Risk Electricity Hedging and Trading report because
of deadline pressures. How is the site doing? I am intrigued by the
competition for trading platforms and was astonished to hear that Goldman,
Morgan, BP and Shell were going to launch a site to compete with yours. Talk
about a shotgun marriage!

If we have time next week, I could step you through our website --
www.weathereffects.com. I'm very proud of what we've done. I can't give out
a password yet but would be happy to walk through the site with you over the
phone using my password. It's a very ambitious site -- with state-of-the-art
WSI weather (seasonal, 6-10, and day to day) driving a good load model for
PJM and NEPOOL. ESAI contributes oil and gas input price forecasts, capacity
judgments, and "herding" ideas to develop power price forecasts for same
time periods. After one month's full-bore effort, I'm pleased with the
results (e.g., we forecast Nepool onpeak to be $43 and it turned out $46).

Have a great weekend.

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:29 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski; Shirley Crenshaw
Subject: Re: Next visit to Houston

Ed,

I shall be available on both days. What about Wednesday,
July 12, between 1:30 and 4:00. Please, let me know
what time would work for you.

It will be nice to see you again.

Vince

P.S. By the way, did you have a chance to take a look at the EOL?

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/28/2000 02:49:41 PM

Please respond to ekrapels@esaibos.com

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Next visit to Houston

Dear Vince,

I will be returning to Houston during the  week of July 10.

ESAI and Weather Services International have launched -- after more than 18
months of R&D --  our service, called Energycast Power Trader and Energycast
Gas Trader, for power traders in Nepool and PJM. I would be happy to review
the service with you as well as take you on a tour of our web site. Are you
available on July 12 - 13?

Sincerely,

Ed Krapels


Hello Vince,

I have heard you were sick.   Hope it is over.

Thank you for the opportunity to visit Enron, again, and to speak to the
guys.  You have a good team. I wonder if you have come up with a decision
regarding my employment?

Look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
Martin


Wednesday, July 19

Hello alphaman_2001,

Welcome to Yahoo! Sports Fantasy Golf.

You have joined the private group called Big E and have entered
the team called E Force in that group.

If at any time, you would like to leave this group, simply go to
the group page and click on the Remove Myself From Group link.

Thanks for joining. See you on the green.

--Fantasy Golf Commissioner
http://golf.fantasysports.yahoo.com/golf


-----Original Message-----
From: Luz Ramirez
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 2:15 PM
To: Adriana Benavides; Bobby Jackson; Carol Quijada; Ernest Massey;
Jennifer Howard; Kimberly Rivera; Latoshia McCrary; Lisa Salinas;
Mariela Gonzalez; Rosalba Robles
Subject: FW: cat attack
Importance: High

WHEN I SAY THAT CATS ARE EVIL, I MEAN IT!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Gauna, Obed [mailto:gauna@copn.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:43 PM
To: 'freddrinksbeer@aol.com'
Subject: FW: cat attack
Importance: High

-----Original Message-----
From: Mifflin, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 10:14 AM
To: Gauna, Obed
Subject: FW: cat attack
Importance: High

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe A Martinez [mailto:Joe.A.Martinez@marshmc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 10:07 AM
To: Donald W Hardy; Jessica V Pena; Heather A Hawkins; Rebecca P Cerda;
Terry Houton; Kristi Looney; Ana B Mondragon; Elsa D Madrigal;
Ronald.A.Valles; DGallegos2; PMRGDROD; mifflin
Subject: Fw: cat attack
Importance: High

 - catattack.MPE


Kate,

In deal # 563262 Eugene Water & Electric and 563259 Salt River Project, I
need to know the Unit name in order to confirm it.

Thanks!!!
Amy


Please see the attached statement from Public Relations -

Assistants:  Please make sure your direct reports receive a copy of this e:mail.

FYI- we issued the attached release this morning. I know our govt affairs teams will have lots of questions and will probably be asked several questions.  Unfortunately, given the legal nature of this inquiry, we cannot say anything more than this at this time.  We are asking our folks not to engage in conversations or opinion related discussions about this.  Also, Ken Lay will be discussing this at an employee meeting tomorrow morning.  It would be a good idea for everyone to tune in, if possible (or review the playback later in the day.)

I am also attaching a brief INTERNAL Q&A about the SEC request- just to give a little more information.

Thanks-
Meredith Phiipp
Public Relations


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

 Here's an update.  I have included Janice because of the overlap of some of
the items:

1.  David Best is working on a very short draft reply to Mitsubishi's
recently-received position in this matter, and will speak with Matt re the
wording before requesting authority to send it out.  I will circulate it to
you for your approval once I see the final draft.

2.  We still have not been advised by Mitsubishi who their lawyer or chemist
will be in this matter.  We know that Mitsubishi recently tried to retain
Tony Rooth of Watson, Farland, who was conflicted out because of the role of
Watson, Farland's Singapore office in this matter.  We expect that the delay
is attributable to the internal procedures at Mitsubishi that come into play
when retaining outside representatives.

3.  Although the joint survey is tentatively scheduled for the week of August
21-25, that may slide, given that ECT's chemist, Steve Jones, and the cargo
underwriters' chemist, Cliff Bennett of Minton's, have not finalized the
testing program that they will jointly submit to whoever Mitsubishi appoints
as its surveyor. I agree with David that it is critical to (a) get the
program right  and (b) make sure the lab (and lab technician) is capable of
handling this testing.  The results of the joint survey will obviously have a
significant impact on this case.

4.  Best anticipates that Steve Jones and Cliff Bennett will ultimately
recommend that ASTM D 3605 with and without ashing be used (I have previously
reported this).

5. In response to Matt's question about which testing method will prevail, I
agree with David that from the standpoint of resolution of the cargo
contamination case, we will not be in a position to determine this until
after the testing is done and the results analyzed.

6. I have spoken with Best about Janice's comments to me about the risk of
the substantial e-mail traffic in this case leading to inadvertent disclosure
of otherwise privileged material.  We are both very open to communicating
strictly by telefax or letter (or memo, with respect to my communications to
each of you), if that does not impose an undue burden on anyone else.  Janice
and Matt, would you let me know what thoughts/concerns  you have about this
concept and/or how to implement it?

7. Janice has also mentioned that in resolving the cargo contamination
matter, we need to be mindful of the confidentiality provisions of the FGH
contract.  It strikes me that we will need to introduce some evidence of our
contractual obligations to FGH and at least a specific description of the
accompanying specifications in arbitration in order to recover.  Under London
arbitration, documents that are received in the course of discovery are
reportedly always treated as confidential and may not be disclosed without
the consent of the party who produces the document.  Janice, I'll give you a
call to discuss whether production by ECT to Mitsubishi of the terms of the
FGH agreement under these circumstances runs afoul of the confidentiality
provision.

I welcome your comments and will continue to keep you advised.

       Britt


Sorry Mike wrong address
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
11/28/2000 12:22 PM
To: Michael L Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2000 Cost Summary thru 11/17

Guys, lets get together to get final resolution to these issues including the
peaker fee asap.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
12:20 PM ---------------------------

Theresa Vos@ENRON
11/28/2000 12:00 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clement Lau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felicia
Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Zarsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Curry/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Warren
Schick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy R
Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2000 Cost Summary thru 11/17

Attached is the Cost Summary for the 2000 Peakers with actuals thru
11/17/00.  I still have not received any cost reports from Nepco.  Please
call me if you have any questions.

thanks,
theresa
x58173


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
02/01/99 09:51 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  trials@optioninvestor.com (Option Investor Newsletter     Trials)
                      01/28/99 08:52 PM

Please respond to trials@optioninvestor.com
To: Option Investor Newsletter Trials <trials@optioninvestor.com>
cc:  (bcc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Thursday Option Investor Newsletter 1 of 2

The Option Investor Newsletter         Thursday  1-28-99
Copyright 1999, All rights reserved.
Redistribution in any form strictly prohibited.

Posted online for subscribers at http://WWW.OPTIONINVESTOR.COM

Also provided as a service to The Online Investor Advantage

Published three times weekly, Sunday, Tuesday, Thursday evenings.
************************************************************
MARKET WRAP  (view in courier font for table alignment)
************************************************************
        1-28-98         High     Low     Volume   Advances Decline
DOW     9281.33 + 81.10 9301.15  9203.57  850,761k  1,552   1,423
Nasdaq  2477.34 + 70.20 2477.47  2438.26 1018,400k  2,067   1,933
S&P-100  632.23 + 10.88  632.95   621.35   Totals   3,619   3,356
S&P-500 1265.37 + 22.20 1266.32  1243.17            51.9%   48.1%
$RUT     423.97 +  2.85  424.19   421.13
$TRAN   3078/33 - 10.77 3114.27  3059.52
VIX       28.61 -  2.75   30.51    28.40
Put/Call Ratio      .51
*************************************************************

What happened to Brazil? Did Intel or Yahoo buy it?

From the 180 degree change in market sentiment we had today you
would think that Brazil was taken over by an Internet stock.
The Intel split announcement and the Yahoo announcement of it's
takeover of GeoCities energized the market and revitalized the
tech sector. Brazil was hardly even mentioned in the days news
after they reported on the maturity date changes before the
market opened.

On top of the blooming optimism at the open Alan Greenspan
actually blessed the Internet sector during a testimony in
Washington. He said basically that he thought investors were
viewing Internet stocks as "lottery ticket" plays were the
odds were much better. He pointed out that analysis of future
earnings and growth was actually culling the good plays from
the bad ones. He said that historically investors often buy
on faith companies that they anticipate to do well before any
actual earnings exist and the Internet sector is no different.

When you consider that there are 68,000 new Internet surfers
coming online every day it just makes sense that the only
five year old Internet will continue to grow at an exponential
rate. With that user growth the leaders will quickly amass
larger audiences while the smaller less efficient providers
will either fall by the wayside or be taken over. Free enterprise
is a wonderful thing and tends to continually prune itself of
excesses and reward hard work and innovation. Enough preaching
but did you know that of the 31 analysts that follow AOL, 28
either recommend a buy or strong buy, even at these prices!!

The Nasdaq was the clear winner again today, setting a new
closing high. The leaders were the four horsemen, MSFT +5.38,
INTC +4.44, DELL +5.38, CSCO +5.44. Most of the Internets
were up double digits again and show no signs of stopping.
I would remind you that Internets have been weak on Fridays
of late as traders take profits from the week.

The Dow was led today by the same stocks that took it down
yesterday. JPM +4.31, C +1.69, T +4.63, MO +2.25, GE +1.94.

Contrary to news hype the Dow traded in exactly the same range
as it traded yesterday only without the end of day drop.
The 9250-9300 range only provided a positive day today due
to the -70 drop at the close yesterday. The market did not
"get well" over night. It just recovered from the spike
caused by two sell programs at the close. Check out a chart!

I really hate to keep coming back to this but the advance/decline
ratio only barely broke even today. The NYSE adv/decl 1552/1423
was only positive by 129 and the Nasdaq 2067/1933 was positive
by 134. This is definitely not a major move and not a major
reversal of the down trend. This could be the start of a new
uptrend but the proof is in Friday's numbers.

I got some hate mail for being somewhat cautious (bearish) in
last nights commentary. When the market had fallen from a +90
high to only +30 at 2:30 this afternoon I was really worried
that the caution was justified and it looked like we could
close negative for the day. I don't feel like a word of
caution after a bad day is particularly bearish but until
Brazil resolves it's problems I believe it bears watching.
When your life savings is invested in the market it is sheer
stupidity not to watch anything that can cause problems. You
would not ignore a rattlesnake in your closet just because
you can't see it today. Eventually it will come out and
probably when you least expect it.

Friday is a wildcard. Futures are up +2.00 and it looks
bullet proof but I know Murphy's law is alive and well.
About the only thing you can count on for tomorrow is more
volatility. It would not surprise me to see techs suffer
from profit taking. Whenever a stock is up double digits
for the week it is a prime candidate.

Good Luck

Jim Brown

*******************************************************
Market Posture
*******************************************************
As of Market Close - Thursday, January 28, 1999

                   Key Support
Broad Market         /Resistance    Last    Posture/Since  Alert
****************************************************************

DOW Industrials    9,100   9,730   9,281    Neutral   1.15
SPX S&P 500        1,210   1,280   1,265    Neutral   1.12
OEX S&P 100          600     635     632    Neutral   1.12
RUT Russell 2000     420     435     424    Neutral   1.12

NDX NASD 100       1,900   2,010   2,105    BULLISH   1.26
MSH High Tech        930     980   1,021    BULLISH   1.26

                   Key Support
Technology           /Resistance    Last    Posture/Since  Alert
****************************************************************
XCI Hardware         830     875     934    BULLISH   1.26
CWX Software         610     665     677    BULLISH   1.26
SOX Semiconductor    360     410     406    Neutral   1.8
NWX Networking       420     450     446    Neutral   1.8
INX Internet         470     570     564    Neutral   1.8

                   Key Support
Financial            /Resistance    Last    Posture/Since  Alert
****************************************************************
BIX Banking          650     710     645    BEARISH   1.22
XBD Brokerage        630     725     689    Neutral   1.14
IUX Insurance        590     620     574    BEARISH   1.21

                   Key Support
Other                /Resistance    Last    Posture/Since  Alert
****************************************************************
RLX Retail           800     860     866    BULLISH   1.28 *
DRG Drug             740     795     776    Neutral   1.26
HCX Healthcare       720     780     762    Neutral   1.26
XAL Airline          310     350     293    BEARISH   1.22
OIX Oil & Gas        245     260     229    BEARISH   1.14

Posture Alert

A positive showing from the equity market has firmed the
bullish bias driven by M&A activity, decent earnings results,
favorable economic data, and a stock split from AOL and
Intel.  After advancing and closing into record territory, we
have turned Bullish across the Retail.  We caution investors,
however, that the current rally has been driven by a few
blue-chip companies and that several key industry sectors are
still trading at or below their 50-day moving averages including
Banking, Insurance, Airlines and Oil & Gas.

A detailed description of our Market Posture and its
applications can be found at:

www.optioninvestor.com/marketposture

******************************************************
Market Sentiment - By Pinnacle Capital Advisors
******************************************************
Percent Bearish Below 30%

According to Investors Intelligence readings, the percentage of
those who are bearish is now only 28.2%.  Investors Intelligence
publishes the percentage of newsletter writers who are "Bullish"
or "bearish" on a weekly basis.  When pessimism evaporates, the
market may be nearly a correction. This is significant because
such a low number of bears suggests that much of the available
capital is ALREADY invested and very little remains to fuel
additional market advances.

Just by way of benchmark, the percent of "bears" back on July 17,
1998 clocked in at 23.3% - just days before the start of a major
sell-off.

Other sentiment indicators are still flashing BEARISH
overtones over the near-term so we advise subscribers to
tightly protect their long positions.
Any questions regarding market sentiment can be directed at:
pinnacle@optioninvestor.com

Market Sentiment at a Glance
********************************************************************
                                Friday      Tues     Thurs
Indicator                       (1/22)     (1/26)   (1/28)   Alert
********************************************************************

Pinnacle Index (OEX):
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Overhead Resistance (620-635)     1.4        1.9        1.7
Underlying Support  (595-610)     1.3        1.3        1.4

Put/Call Ratios:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CBOE Total P/C Ratio               .5         .5         .5
CBOE Equity P/C Ratio              .4         .4         .4   *
OEX P/C Ratio                     1.2        1.1        1.1

Peak Open Interest (OEX):
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Puts                              610        610        610
Calls                             610        610        610
P/C Ratio                         .9         .9         1.19

Market Volatility Index (VIX):
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CBOE VIX                         32.85      29.35     28.61   *

Investors Intelligence:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bullish                          60.0%      60.0%     60.7%   *
Bearish                          30.0%      30.0%     28.2%   *

The Power of Expectation Analysis

It has often been said that the crowd is right during the
market trends but wrong at both ends.  Measuring and
evaluating the sentiment of the crowd, therefore, can give
savvy option traders a decided edge.

Pinnacle Index
-----------------------------------------------------------------
OEX                             Friday     Tues     Thurs
Benchmark                       (1/22)     (1/26)   (1/28)
-----------------------------------------------------------------

                    (630-635)      2.7        3.2      3.4
                    (620-625)      1.1        1.3      1.1
Overhead Resistance (620-635)      1.4        1.9      1.7

OEX Close                       610.38     627.17   632.23

Underlying Support  (595-610)      1.3        1.3      1.4
                    (605-610)      1.0        1.0      1.1
                    (595-600)      1.9        1.9      1.9

Average ratings:
Resistance levels 2.0 / Support .5

What the Pinnacle Index is telling us:
Overhead sentiment resistance is Moderately weak at the OEX
620/635 level while the underlying support is moderately weak.

Put/Call Ratio (10-Day Moving Average)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                Friday     Tues      Thurs
Strike/Contracts                (1/22)     (1/26)    (1/28)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CBOE Total P/C Ratio              .53        .54        .53
CBOE Equity P/C Ratio             .40        .42        .41
OEX P/C Ratio                    1.15       1.13       1.06

Peak Open Interest (OEX)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
                     Friday         Tues           Thurs
Strike/Contracts     (1/22)         (1/26)         (1/28)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Puts                 610 / 11,153   610 / 10,675   610 / 11,645
Calls                610 / 11,865   610 / 10,926   610 / 10,683
Put/Call Ratio       .94            .98            1.19

Volatility Index (VIX)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
                    Major
Date                Turning Point       VIX
-----------------------------------------------------------------
October 97          Bottom              54.60
July 20, 1998       Top                 16.88
October 8, 1998     Bottom              60.63
January 11, 1998    Top                 26.38

January 22, 1999                        32.85
January 26, 1999                        29.35   *
January 28, 1999                        28.61   *

Investors Intelligence Survey
-----------------------------------------------------------------
                    Major             Percent     Percent
Date                Turning Point     Bullish     Bearish
-----------------------------------------------------------------
October 97          Bottom            22.0        48.3
July 20, 1998       Top               52.0        24.0
October 8, 1998     Bottom            38.5        42.7
January 11, 1999    Top ?             58.3        30.0

January 26, 1999                      60.7        28.2   *

Please view this in COURIER 10 font for alignment
*****************************************************
RESULTS THIS WEEK

Index Last       Mon   Tue    Wed    Thu   Week
Dow       9281 82.65 121.26 -124.4   81.1 160.66
Nasdq     2477 30.43  64.10 -26.27   70.2 138.46
$OEX       632  5.68  11.11  -5.82  10.88  21.85
$SPX      1265  8.79  18.33  -9.14   22.2  40.18
$RUT       424 -0.33   3.22  -4.21   2.85   1.53
$TRAN     3078 49.17  26.47 -50.34 -10.77  14.53
$VIX        29 -0.82  -1.18   2.51  -2.75

Stock Price   Mon   Tue   Wed   Thu   Week

AOL     174.44  5.56  8.86 10.50  8.94 33.86 Another 2:1 split on schedule
MSFT    174.00  5.63  9.69 -2.94  5.38 17.76 Dip buying en masse
SEPR    111.75  2.25  2.50 -2.00  9.50 12.25 Reaction to LLY's Prozac #s??
SUNW    109.31  3.06  5.56 -1.19  3.88 11.31 Dip buying en masse
DELL     94.19  1.88  3.63  0.00  5.69 11.20 Time for a pullback
BBY      90.44  3.63  3.63  2.13  1.81 11.20 Time for a pullback
LXK     110.31  4.88  3.88  1.31  1.00 11.07 Ditto
VOD     197.63  3.25  2.88  0.13  4.00 10.26 Looking very strong
NOK/A   154.00 -0.56  1.38 -0.13  8.75  9.44 Split Candidate with Earnings
EMC     106.88  3.50 -0.25  0.06  5.06  8.37 Internet storage gorilla
CEN      80.38  2.38  3.06  1.50  1.38  8.32 On a split run
CVC      70.50  2.13  1.31  1.57  2.63  7.62 New pick
CLX     121.69  1.43  2.57  0.81  2.50  7.31 New pick,Defensive play
CSCO    108.88  0.63  3.69 -3.69  5.44  6.07 Split Candidate on Monday
XLNX     83.50 -1.06  5.44 -2.75  3.69  5.32 Dip buying en masse
WCOM     79.88  2.81  0.25 -0.38  2.31  4.99 At resistance.
MU       75.25 -1.50  2.88 -0.38  3.75  4.75 Influenced by INTC excitement
ORCL     53.69  1.19  1.81 -1.88  2.69  3.81 Dip buying en masse
ANF      73.00  2.13  2.06 -0.19 -0.75  3.25 Consolidating
DH       63.06  0.31  0.63  2.13  0.06  3.13 Great showing Wednesday
WMT      85.13  0.00  1.56  1.63 -0.06  3.13 Slow and sure
XIRC     45.00 -0.06  0.38  1.56  1.13  3.01 Gaining momentum
VIA/B    85.00  0.44 -0.88  1.00  2.13  2.69 Gaining momentum
SNC      40.25  1.19  0.56  0.06  0.69  2.50 Consolidating
UTX     116.94  1.25  1.44 -1.38  1.06  2.37 Dow bull rider

PUTS

AVP      35.63  0.00 -1.13  0.13 -0.94 -1.94 Breaking down
DD       52.69  0.44 -0.88 -0.75 -0.44 -1.63 Breaking down again
BKB      36.31 -0.50 -0.38 -1.19  0.75 -1.32 Leaking
AMR      54.50  0.38  0.25 -2.69  1.31 -0.75 Losing altitude
BAC      64.88 -0.38  0.25 -2.81  2.75 -0.19 Leaking
AVT      44.81 -0.75  1.38 -1.31  0.56 -0.12 Continued weakness
AXP     100.44  3.00  0.25 -2.31  1.00  1.94 Continued weakness
PHSYB    70.38  1.75 -0.56 -0.44  1.50  2.25
PG       87.81 -1.69  1.94  0.75  1.50  2.50 On the edge
BDX      36.31  1.94  0.56  0.25 -0.19  2.56 Selloff still intact
CPB      47.00  1.25 -1.44  2.00  0.88  2.69 Soups getting cold
MRK     142.44 -1.50  6.50 -0.25 -1.31  3.44 Dropped
WLA      72.13 -0.44  1.63  3.13 -0.13  4.19 Dropped
HSY      63.94  2.50  0.00  0.44  2.00  4.94 Dropped

PICKS WE DROPPED
****************
When we drop a pick it doesn't mean we are recommending a sell
on that play. Many dropped picks go on to be very profitable.
We drop a pick because something happened to change its
profile. News, price, direction, etc. We drop it because we
don't want anyone else starting a new play at that time.
We have hundreds of new readers with each issue who are
unfamiliar with the previous history for that pick and we
want them to look at any current pick as a valid play.

CALLS:
******

None

PUTS:
******

HSY - $64.00 2.00 (5.50) Stopped out of position at $62.25
today (1/28).

MRK - $142.50 -1.25 (3.50) Stop out of position on Wednesday
(1/27) on drug stock rally at $145.25.

WLA - $72.13 -.13 (4.13). Stopped out of position at $72.25 on
Wednesday (1/27) on drug sector rally.

PICK NEWS - CALLS
*******************************************************
EMC $106.88 +5.06 (+8.38) EMC set a new high today and closed
near the high.  The positive press just continues to roll in.
There was an article by The Motely Fool yesterday that is worth
reading if you trade EMC.  Some of the highlights of the
article are that EMC's market share in the data storage market
has grown from 28% to 32% while IBM's has decreased from 24% to
20%.  The Internet and E-commerce should continue to drive
EMC's sales, as 8 of the 10 largest Internet service providers
already use EMC storage systems.  Also in the news today,
Gruntal & Co. started coverage on EMC with a buy rating.

ORCL $53.69 +2.69 (+3.81) ORCL set a new high today, and closed
slightly below its old high.  In the news, ORCL's Japanese
subsidiary priced it initial public offering today.  It is
expected to be one of Japan's hottest IPOs in many months.
Like many US IPOs, it is expected to soar on the day of its
debut.  ORCL's ownership in the company will fall from 91% to
85% after the public offering.  The other news item that is
probably helping ORCL a little is Informix, the No. 5 maker of
database software, announced better than expected earnings.
(which is likely to raise expectations for ORCL).

UTX $116.94 +1.06 (+2.38) UTX set a new 52 week high at $118.75
after the open on Wednesday, and has traded down since then.
As we have said on numerous occasions, with the lack of news,
UTX will mirror the Dow.  In fact, if you look at its daily
chart from today you will see what we mean.  UTX took a dip
shortly after noon and recovered towards the close.  We haven't
had any news on UTX, but the Street did like the announcement
last week about UTX deciding to sell its underperforming
automotive unit.

MU $75.13 +3.63 (+4.63) Micron was off slightly yesterday, but
today it gapped up at the open and kept on going.  We said on
Tuesday that while Micron's current quarter ends in February,
and earnings won't be released until sometime in March, the
stock will react to any news on other chip stocks in the
meantime.  Most of the sector is in the middle of earnings
releases.  A 2-for-1 stock split by chip sector leader Intel
can only be positive for the other chip stocks.  Look for MU
to continue moving higher in sympathy.

NOKA $152.75 +7.50 (+8.19) Nokia saw a nice jump in its stock
price today ahead of tomorrow morning's earnings report. If
you sold this afternoon, you locked in your profits and you
can jump back in tomorrow if the numbers look good and/or
they announce a split.  Those who held over should note that
earnings will be reported before the NYSE opening bell, so the
stock will gap up or down accordingly.  Rival Ericsson just
reported strong earnings and received an upgrade.  Nokia has
been looking even stronger than Ericsson in recent months, so
we are hoping for big news in the morning.

WMT $85.44 +.25 (+3.44) The King of retailers is back to its
old ways--a slow but steady climb in price, which is why we
picked them up again. WMT is sitting just below the intra-day
high it set on Tuesday of $85.94, which is it's only resistance.
WMT had a 389,000 share block trade Wednesday at $84.00. This
is both a momentum play and a split candidate (which we would
expect with earnings).

BBY $90.44 +1.81 (+11.19) Best Buy keeps powering ever higher,
today setting a new intra-day high of $91.94. BBY seems to have
found a successful retail formula, and they sell what consumers
want most these days: technology products. Everything is
increasing for this company: total number of stores, same store
sales, market share, profit margins, and stock price. Higher
selling and administrative costs also showed up on their last
quarterly report, but they were part of an effort to improve
performance and increase volume. The only thing that declined
was their interest expense, and that is very positive. Sales
for most of the holiday period will show up in the current
quarter, so there is probably still good news yet to come.

DELL Computer $94.19 +5.69 (+11.19)  We often note that
volume is critical to sustained price moves, and bemoan
Dell a bit on its lighter volume.  Fortunately, trading
volume swelled yesterday and today to 23 million and 21
million shares, respectively; average is 17.5 million.
Dell traded flat yesterday, but was up $5.69 today to a new
all-time high.  There is still room to run as Dell blasted
through resistance with no immediate end in site.  Protect
your profits with stops and confirm direction first before
playing. Earnings are scheduled after the close, February
16.

CSCO - Cisco Systems $108.88 +5.48 (+6.07)  Cisco was
wholloped yesterday into the $103 range, but made it all
back, and then some, today on strong volume.  NASDAQ is on
a tear with CSCO as the 3rd highest weighted stock in the
NASDAQ 100.  Market willing, expect further advances into
earnings.  CSCO is also a split candidate with enough
shares authorized to announce a 3:2 split along with
earnings scheduled for release on February 2.  The run has
begun.  Dips are buyable.  Confirm upward movement first
and use stops to protect your profits.

AOL - America Online $174.75 +9.25 (+34.27)  Same league as
Microsoft.  AOL announced $0.17 earnings yesterday, $0.03
better than estimates, and a 2:1 stock split (effective
February 22).  Volume swelled to almost 20 million shares,
both yesterday and today, sending AOL into orbit.  Buying
pressure is still on as AOL closed at a new all-time high.
Resistance is weak at $176, its all-time trading high set
today just before the close.  AOL's new target price is
$210 and now occupies a top 10 position in the Fidelity
Magellan Fund.  With so much profit built in, remember to
use stops.  Dips are buyable.  Market permitting, the sky
is the limit.

WCOM - MCIWorldCom $79.88 +2.31 (+5.00)  Here we are again;
WCOM just can't seem to break resistance at $80.  Market
willing, it looks like we'll get another chance to crack it
tomorrow.  Wait for penetration of $80 with strong volume
before making a play.  Still benefiting from Supreme Court
ruling against the Baby Bells, WCOM is rumored to soon be
announcing the start of a new consumer Internet service,
different from UUNET, its business ISP.  In its acquisition
of MCI, WCOM was required to shed its consumer ISP
division, Cable and Wireless, in order to gain Federal
approval for the merger.  Dips are buyable, but wait for a
clear reversal.

MSFT - Microsoft $174.00 +5.38 (+17.75)  A nice surprise,
MSFT still wants to run following it's stellar earnings and
Monday's 2:1 split announcement (effective 3/26),
contingent upon shareholder approval.  We expected a
pullback, but not as small as the one we got.  After losing
less than $3 yesterday, MSFT closed today at a new all-time
high, just $0.06 off its highest trade on 53% higher than
average volume -- extremely bullish.  If the market
continues up, MSFT will too since they are the largest
component of the NASDAQ 100.  As always, confirm market
direction first [don't forget to use stops]

DH - Dayton Hudson $63.06 +0.06 (+3.12)  Slow and steady;
that's the way the parent company of Target Stores moves.
Volume was a little light today -- only 1.3 million shares
traded.  Yesterday, DH gave us a nice $2+ pop on 2 million
shares (2 million average).  70,000 shares traded at the
close yesterday at a price of $63, lending some support at
this price.  No news this week.  Look for small rises to
continue if the market cooperates.  1189 institutions own
89.5% of the 395 million shares in float leaving about 40
million shares in daily float to trade.  Translation:  not
many sellers; extra volume will tend to goose the price.
Dips are buyable on a reversal.  DH is a more conservative
play.

ANF $73.00 -0.75 (+3.25)  After the $4.19 run it made on
Monday and Tuesday, ANF was due for some profit taking.
Wednesday, it lost $0.19 to humor us.  Thursday, ANF
teeter-tottered back and forth between green and red for most
of the day but then finally decided to finish negative.
ANF seems to be consolidating before resuming its course.
Just to be sure, wait for ANF to show upward movement again
before initiating new positions.

SEPR $111.75 +9.50 (+12.25)  Geez, when we initiated coverage
of this pharmaceutical company on Tuesday, we planned on
seeing the stock gradually increase.  Instead, the stock
pleasantly surprised us by spiking up +$11.25 during Thursday
trading.  It even broke above the new 12 month price target
of $112 set by BancBoston Robertson just last Friday.  However,
it couldn't hold on and finished the day at $111.75.  The
uphill spurt may in part be due to news of improved sales of
Eli Lilly's depression drug named Prozac.  Lilly and Sepracor
are currently working on an improved version of Prozac (which
loses its patent protection sometime after 2001).  Set your
stop losses tight to prepare for any subsequent profit taking.

***** Play updates continued in section two *****

FREE TRIAL READERS
******************
If you like the results you have been receiving we
would welcome you as a permanent subscriber.

The monthly subscription price is 39.95. The quarterly
price is 99.95 which is $20 off the monthly rate.

We would like to have you as a subscriber. You may
subscribe at any time but your subscription will not
start until your free trial is over.

To subscribe you may go to our website at

www.optioninvestor.com

and click on "subscribe" to use our secure credit
card server or you may simply send an email to

 "subscribe@optioninvestor.com"

with your credit card information,(number, exp date, name)
or you may call us at 303-797-0200 and give us the
information over the phone.

You may also fax the information to: 303-797-1333

*************************************************************
                      DISCLAIMER
*************************************************************
This newsletter is a publication dedicated to the education
of options traders. The newsletter is an information service
only. The information provided herein is not to be construed
as an offer to buy or sell securities of any kind. The
newsletter picks are not to be considered a recommendation
of any stock or option but an information resource to aid the
investor in making an informed decision regarding trading in
options. It is possible at this or some subsequent date, the
editor and staff of The Option Investor Newsletter may own,
buy or sell securities presented. All investors should consult
a qualified professional before trading in any security. The
information provided has been obtained from sources deemed
reliable but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness.
The newsletter staff makes every effort to provide timely
information to its subscribers but cannot guarantee specific
delivery times due to factors beyond our control.


Thanks Judy - you are doing the right things and it is important!

Regards
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Gray, Judy
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:15 PM
To: 'tmlechner@earthlink.net'
Cc: Delainey, David W.; Pieper, Kalen; Hughes, Evan
Subject: Response to letter sent to Kalen Pieper on 12/4/01

Michael;

Listed below are some specific answers to your questions.  In addition, please check the www.enron.com <http://www.enron.com> web site regularly for up-to-date Q & A.  You may also call me if you need further clarification.

1.  You will be receiving a termination letter and other information regarding your termination this week.
2.  You will receive pay for Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday last week. This amount is included on a check that is being mailed to your home this week.
3.  Your termination letter will be the document that you can provide to your wife's employer to enroll in her benefit plan.  This same letter will facilitate an unemployment claim as well as providing documentation for a judge where you are to serve on jury duty
4.  Submitted and approved expenses are being processed.  Because there is a high-volume of requests, this is taking some time, and we are working as quickly as possible.
5.  Please send me a copy of your unpaid phone bill and I will forward it to accounts payable for processing.

Please feel free to contact me if you need further assistance or clarification.

Take Care
Judy Gray
Director of Human Resources
713.345.9375


It appears that the following email may not have been clear.  You have to copy all documents yourself.

This is my cheat sheet if it helps:

H Drives:
1.  Each person will have to move any data over personally from the old H drive (which is now Z:) drive to their new H drive.
2. The Z: drive (old H:) will be removed from UBS employees on Thursday night.

O Drives:
1. For the old O or M drives go to O:\ESTATE\ O (or M ? pending location of data) and copy to the new common O.  The Estate O and M will be removed from UBS employees on Thursday night.

Do not delete anything and only copy information which is complies with the policy.  Please make sure that those people who are not in the office are contacted and comply.

Louise

To:		All Enron Employees Transferring to UBS Warburg Energy (or its affiliates)

Under the terms of the various agreements among certain Enron entities and UBS AG, certain Enron data and documents may be provided to UBS.  To ensure compliance with those agreements, Enron's document retention policy, as well as directives of various investigative agencies, the attached protocol regarding the process for migration of any information or data to UBS has been developed.

Please review the protocol carefully.  Then, complete the attached Certification and return it, with attachments, to Linda Guinn at EB 3829a no later than February 11, 2002.

Questions about this matter may be directed to Michelle Cash at (713) 853-6401 or Francisco Pinto-Leite at (713) 345-7942 .

Protocol Document and Data Copy Instructions

Certification Document


-----Original Message-----
From: Pickering, Mark
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 6:25 PM
To: 'zhiong.wei@enron.com'; Nat, Steve; Rao, Ramesh
Cc: Beck, Sally; Rub, Jenny
Subject: Weekend

Please be aware that there will be a number of risk management people in at the weekend, running important scenarios and position reports. Please make sure you are contactable if problems occur. Send your contact numbers to Sally.

Thanks
MRP
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Hello,

Well, it's Wednesday, hump day.  It's mid-week and we're heading into the
weekend. It's also time when you get to experience CATERED DINNERS, again!
Yes, the glamour, comfort and joy of this wonderful event is going into
its third day.

Today's dinner will be:  ITALIAN BUFFET.

No, it's not pizza from Jimmy Bean's.  It's spaghetti from Jimmy Beans.
Those of you who have had pasta from Jimmy Bean know what a real treat
this is.  Just kidding, Jimmy Bean is not involved in this event.

Seung Lee
Haas School of Business
Evening MBA Program


Attached for your review are drafts of the Capacity Assignment and Release
Agreement and the Transaction No. 1 attached to the Master Firm Purchase Sale
Enfolio.

Peter,  any input you would have on Article 3 of the Assignment Agreement
would be greatly appreciated.  Stephanie is trying to get these out as soon
as possible tomorrow.


Lunch with Joe Hartsoe at 12:00

Return to Houston on 5:20 flight.


Executive Search Partners Inc.

Thanks for taking the time to speak with me. I appreciate the
opportunity to introduce myself to you.  As you are well aware, a
quality recruiter can be an invaluable resource to you, especially with
the current state of energy industry.

Executive Search Partners, Inc. provides national recruiting services
across diverse business sectors. I specialize in the placement of
Traders and Risk Management positions within the financial services and
energy industries. Having spent over 15 years in the trading profession,
including a position as one of the top Head Long Treasury Traders for
Merrill Lynch Canada and an owner-operator of a Commodities Trading
Company, I know the industry and am qualified to assist you in your job
search. The relationships with my client firms in the energy industry
have helped me successfully place candidates at all levels in the risk
area.

We understand the need to receive proper representation from your
recruiter as it is a reflection of you in your job search.  With
intensive and daily exposure to the market, we seek potential job
opportunities and most often know of positions before they're posted. By
analyzing your own needs and objectives, career goals and philosophy, we
develop with you a target profile for an ideal company and position.
Candidates have found that having us assist during final discussions and
negotiations with the prospective company provides them third party
sensitivity and objectivity, so often necessary to close the deal.

Our proven methods for helping people will give you a step up on other
candidates in this ever-changing market, where time and timing are
everything. As someone that knows and understands your business, I feel
strongly that I am qualified to help you. I look forward to working with
you to explore job opportunities that can enhance your career.

Sincerely,

Michael D. Hubley

Vice President

mdhubley@ex-sp.com  or call 800-350-2415


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
04:01 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
03/08/2001 11:21 AM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Stanford MBA Recruiting

Greg,

This is the agenda for the recruiting trip to Stanford next week.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
11:21 AM ---------------------------

Althea Gordon@ENRON
03/07/2001 04:30 PM
To: vince.kaminski@enron.com, brad.romine@enron.com, brad.alford@enron.com,
martin.lin@enron.com, theresa_riedman@enron.net, matt_harris@enron.net,
michael.smythe@enron.net, benjamin.bell@enron.com, mauricio.mora@enron.com,
celeste.roberts@enron.com
cc: shirley.crenshaw@enron.com, paula.austin@enron.com,
dolores.muzzy@enron.com, cathy.lira@enron.com, patricia.payton@enron.com
Subject: Stanford MBA Recruiting

Thank you for agreeing to participate in the Associate Program's recruiting
efforts at Stanford Graduate School of Business.

The itinerary for the trip is as follows:

Wednesday, March 14, 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Dinner with students selected to
interview
       Il Fornaio, the Sala Del Canaletto Room
       520 Cowper Street, Palo Alto
       (650) 853-3888

Thursday, March 15, 8:30 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.  Round 1 interviews for both
Summer and Full Time Associates
       Stanford GSB Career Services Center
       Interviewers:
       Theresa Riedman
       Brad Romine
       Brad Alford
       Martin Lin
       Michael Smythe - to be confirmed
       Benjamin Bell - to be confirmed
       Mauricio Mora - Greeter/Alternate Interviewer

Thursday, March 15, 12:15 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Lunch with Dean George Parker
(Associate Dean of Academics) and
       Sherrie Taguchi (Director of Career Services).
       Stanford GSB Career Services Center
       We will be ordering lunch in.

Friday, March 16, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.*   Round 2 interviews for both
Summer and Full Time Associates
       Stanford GSB Career Services Center
       Interviewers:
       Vince Kaminski
       Matthew Harris

* Please note that this is an approximate time that will be based on the
number of candidates who successfully pass Round 1 interviews on Thursday.

Your hotel information is as follows:

       Stanford Park Hotel
       100 El Camino Real
       Menlo Park
       (650) 322-1234

Upon confirmation of your participation you will receive your hotel
confirmation number.  In the event that you have not received your hotel
confirmation number please contact my assistant, Cathy Lira, at x54049.

Attire for the trip will be business casual.  If you have any questions
please feel free to give me a call at x53860.  In case of emergency (and
during the trip itself) I can be reached at (713) 416-6250.

Thank you for your support of the program.


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
02:04 PM ---------------------------

"Heckler, James" <james.heckler@csfb.com> on 09/22/2000 08:04:54 AM
To: "'benjamin.rogers@enron.com'" <benjamin.rogers@enron.com>,
"'don.miller@enron.com'" <don.miller@enron.com>
cc: "Al-Farisi, Omar" <omar.al-farisi@csfb.com>, "Modi, Rishi"
<rishi.modi@csfb.com>
Subject: FW: a few more questions

Ben,

Can we get the answers to these also.

Thanks,
James

-----Original Message-----
From: Iaconetti, Louis
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 8:59 AM
To: Al-Farisi, Omar; Modi, Rishi; Heckler, James
Subject: Fw: a few more questions

Some additional questions.

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Favinger, Thomas <thomas.favinger@neg.pge.com>
To: 'louis.iaconetti@csfb.com' <louis.iaconetti@csfb.com>
Sent: Fri Sep 22 08:41:28 2000
Subject: a few more questions

1) do the capital cost of linears (gas, transmission and system upgrades)
include tax gross ups relating thereto?

2) Is the cost of backup power (for startup and station service) included in
the variable O&M estimate, or is it included in one of the fixed charges.
Please tell us where it is and how much it is expected to be annually?

Thanks.

Thomas G. Favinger
PG&E National Energy Group
7500 Old Georgetown Road
Bethesda, Maryland 20814-6161
Ph 301-280-6231
Fx 301-280-6911

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


In order to help spread the EnronOnline success story we have created a new
daily report, which includes slides and statistics for public consumption.
The information contained in this attachment can be communicated to audiences
outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent
message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone
in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the
company.

There are a couple of messages, which we like to concentrate on when
discussing EnronOnline. Please keep the following messages in mind, to be
used as verbal responses when talking to a customer and the opportunity
arises:

- EnronOnline is just another way for our customers to do business with us.
- EnronOnline provides price discovery and simple transactions for free.

Please note that this report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone
presentation, nor that all the information be used in a single presentation
or customer communication.   If we have missed a specific area, please let us
know and we will add it for you on a daily basis.


Can you sneak me a copy of the latest draft? Maybe I can negotiate with Ben.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2001 07:01
AM ---------------------------

Ann Elizabeth White@ECT
04/18/2001 06:56 PM
To: Roseann Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON
cc: Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON,
Barbara Gray, Ben Jacoby, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: MOA - Pompano Beach

After our meeting, Ben asked me to please delete the phrase "or its
designee"  from this draft and, with the assignment language (Section 14), I
thought it was clear that there could be a designee (or assignee) if PBEC
desired in its sole and absolute discretion.

I've also spoken to Herman about his concern that I didn't put in an
additional Whereas statement that specifically stated that this agreement is
not a binding obligation on PBEC's part to build the facility or incur any of
the fees addressed. Ben and I also discussed this and I had hoped that adding
a Whereas Clause that says "PBEC desires to construct the Facility if it
receives all requisite local, city, county, state or federal approvals for
development and construction thereof" made it clearly contingent and that,
coupled with broad assignment and termination language, would suffice.  As
Barbara specifically pointed out at our meeting, the agreement is in fact a
binding agreement but the obligations under the agreement are not binding
until the conditions subsequent have occurred (being the commencement of
construction) and the events of commencement of construction are entirely
within PBEC's control.

I guess I'm not clear as to what the  concern is for adding the word
"designee" when the agreement says PBEC has the sole and absolute right to
assign to another party, without the City's consent and, if we elect to not
build the facility or the agreement otherwise terminates, PBEC is relieved of
all obligations under the agreement, which is what is provided for in Section
16.d.  I would think that the broad rights of assignment and the absolute
release are stronger than just adding the word "designee" in the definition
of PBEC.

From: Roseann Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/18/2001 05:42 PM
To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: MOA - Pompano Beach

Ann Elizabeth - I have reviewed the latest draft - is there any reason why we
can't add the phrase "or its designee" in the definition of "PBEC"?  Although
I understand you have included a broad assignment provision, it helps to
include "designee" language to show our compliance with the facility
structure.

Thanks,

Rose


[IMAGE]

	Dear Colleague:?

	Through a special arrangement with Skipping Stone we are able to offer  you a
FREE 2-WEEK TRIAL to the Daily Electric Power News
(http://www.energycentral.com/start_electric.cfm)?
	and  or the Daily Gas News (http://www.energycentral.com/start_gas.cfm)
e-mail service.?

	Both publications deliver headlines along with a brief summary of every
major story in the energy industry, every business day, right to your  e-mail
box! Our convenient format allows you to quickly scan the headlines  and
select the full text of any story that you want to read.?

	Simply reply to this e-mail message with Electric News Trial or follow  this
link http://www.energycentral.com/start_electric.cfm  for a FREE trial to the
Daily Electric News.?

	For a Daily Gas News Trial reply to this e-mail message with Gas News  Trial
or point your browser to http://www.energycentral.com/start_gas.cfm,  and
join more than 47,000 registered industry professionals who get their
information from Energy Central.?

	Please visit our Web site at http://www.energycentral.com -- it is the  best
place on the web to start your search for power information.?

	Sincerely,?
	Mark Johnson, Publisher
	Energy Central?

	energycental.com - Where the energy industry does  business.

	2755 South Locust Street? ??? Suite  201? ?? Denver, CO 80222
	Phone: (303) 782-5510?  ?? FAX (303) 782-5331
	http://www.energycentral.com

[IMAGE]

TO BE REMOVED FROM OUR EMAIL LIST  PLEASE CLICK  HERE


I apologize for the late notice, but Sally has just been notified that a
cross-functional PRC meeting w/ Rick Causey has been set for this Friday,
December 1.  She will need a compilation of your accomplishments by
Thursday.  If you have directors reporting to you, please request that they
also have data in to Sally by Thursday.

Thanks for your help,
Patti x39106


I'm in on Key West!


John & Eric,
Here are the Scheduled VPP (100%) volumes for the 2nd Preston VPP.

Please provide us with a NYMEX quote and a basis quote.

Thanks for your help.

Eric
x33490
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 10:18
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mark Castiglione @ ENRON                           12/18/2000 11:49 AM

To: Phillip Ballard/NA/Enron@Enron, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Scheduled Volumes for 2nd Preston VPP

Attached is the volume schedule for the 2nd VPP with Preston.

Mark


at least this is one thing to cross off your list.  For the Silicon Valley
meeting, Steve suggested that we use Scott McNealy's contact.  I can
coordinate -- let me know if I can take that off your plate, too. thx kd

From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/11/2001 02:18 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Information for Call to LA Mayor Dick Riordan

This looks fantastic.  I apologize profusely. I've got a dozen assigments to
finish by COB.  But having read this, you obviously needed no help from me.
Let me know how the call with Riordan goes.

Best,
Jeff

	Karen Denne
	05/11/2001 02:16 PM

		 To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Information for Call to LA Mayor Dick Riordan

Ken -- Thank you for making next Thursday, May 17 available for CEO meetings
in California.  We are working to set up two meetings -- one in Los Angeles
and one in Silicon Valley (we'll call on Scott McNealy's contact person to
help pull the Northern California meeting together).   For the Los Angeles
meeting, we'd like you to call Mayor Dick Riordan (213-847-3560) and ask for
his help in pulling together a group of key, influential business leaders.
As background, Riordan is a very wealthy Republican businessman who has been
term-limited out and has not yet made public his future political aspirations
(a bid for governor has been mentioned by insiders).

You might congratulate him on helping to settle the Writer's Guild strike and
ask if he'd now like to resolve the energy crisis (He's in a bit of a spat
with Dave Freeman over who can claim credit for LADWP's success during this
energy situation -- see attached LA Times article).  You can say you've been
told that he was one of the clearer heads during the deregulation process and
were instrumental in keeping DWP out of the regulatory mess.

This is an opportunity for Riordan to help broker a solution, and that's why
you're calling him.  You met with Robert Day (Trust Co of the West) who
suggested that you call Riordan and enlist his support.

Explain about our comprehensive solution -- business support is critical to
garner political support.

You'll be in Los Angeles next Thursday.  Ask if he could invite and host a
meeting of key business leaders and introduce you.  I've attached a suggested
list of prominent businessmen, close associates and personal friends of
Riordan's.  We'd like to position this meeting as an insider's conversation
of what's going on with the energy situation.  This meeting should be for
principals only.

Ask Riordan to identify someone in his office who we can work with to set up
the meeting.  Enron's consultant in LA (Marathon Communications) will work to
coordinate the event.

If Riordan is not available next Thursday, ask him if he would ask Eli Broad
(chairman of Sun America and a Democratic billionaire) or Jerry Perenchio
(chairman of Univision) to host the meeting.

Proposed Invitees

*Eli Broad - Chairman, Sun America
*Ron Burkle - Yucaipa Companies
Jeffrey Katzenberg - DreamWorks
Sherry Lansing- Paramount
Nelson Rising- Catellus
Bob Daly - LA Dodgers
Ray Irani - Occidental Petroleum
*Jerry Perenchio - Univison
Michael Eisner/Bob Iger - Disney
Ed Roski - Majestic Realty
Earvin Johnson/Ken Lombard - Johnson Development Corporation
Bruce Karatz - Kaufmann & Broad
Terry Semel - Yahoo!
Gary Winnick - Global Crossing
Henry Yuen - Gemstar
*Carl McKinsey
*Liam McGee - Bank of America
*Barry Munitz - Getty Trust
*Gordon Binder - Amgen (ret)
David Baltimore - Cal Tech
Danny Villanueva - Bastion Capital
Phil Anschutz - Qwest Communications, Staples Center
*Dennis Tito - civilian spaceman (former LADWP Commissioner)
Kent Kresa - Northrop Grumann

Sunday, May 6, 2001
Riordan and Freeman's Feud Erupts in Public
Power: Each questions the other's role in keeping the city free of
California's energy crisis.
By MICHAEL FINNEGAN, TERENCE MONMANEY, Times Staff Writers

?????With California mired in energy troubles, Mayor Richard Riordan and his
former power chief S. David Freeman trumpet the extraordinary fortune of Los
Angeles: no rate hikes and no blackouts.
?????Yet Riordan and Freeman have sullied their mutual success story by
waging bitter campaigns to discredit each other--at first behind the scenes
but now in public.
?????Pettiness, ingratitude, conflicts of interest, overblown claims of
achievement: Such is the back and forth between two leaders who would seem to
have good reason to pat each other on the back.
?????To Freeman, who has resigned as general manager of the L.A. Department
of Water and Power to become chief energy advisor to Gov. Gray Davis, it
seems Riordan resents his high-profile role in trying to steer California out
of the energy crisis.
?????So the mayor, Freeman charged, has elbowed his way into energy issues
that he is ill-equipped to handle and taken steps along the way that could
harm the environment.
?????"With all due respect, I have 25 years of experience and knowledge--and
he has 25 days," Freeman said. "But he's the mayor, and he didn't like it
that I didn't just say yes to everything he came up with."
?????To Riordan, Freeman's efforts to fight air pollution have given short
shrift to the threat of skyrocketing power rates in Los Angeles. The mayor
said Freeman also failed to recognize potential conflicts of interest between
his city and state roles in the power crisis. And he scoffed at Freeman for
saying he had lifted morale at DWP.
?????"Morale was terrible under him," Riordan said. "I mean, they are so
relieved right now."
?????The backbiting has left associates suspecting the clash is really about
egos. City Councilwoman Ruth Galanter sees Riordan and Freeman as proud,
successful men unable to say, "I couldn't have done it without X, Y and Z."
?????"Each of them is used to being the boss and taking pleasure at being
recognized as the boss," she said.
?????Much of the conflict has taken place in private meetings. And the mayor,
a Republican multimillionaire, has taken pains to play down his dispute with
Freeman, a liberal Democrat from Tennessee who wears a cowboy hat and speaks
with a Southern drawl.
?????In an interview after his resignation, Freeman laid out the conflict
point by point, often in terms bluntly critical of the mayor. One of his
concerns, Freeman said, was that Riordan in his final two months as mayor
could reverse the agency's progress in protecting the environment.
?????Freeman cited Riordan's plans concerning coal-fired power plants in
Nevada and Utah that are partly controlled by the DWP, the nation's largest
municipal utility. The first is the Mohave Generating Station in Laughlin,
Nev., a plant that has been blamed for spreading some of the haze that
shrouds the Grand Canyon. The DWP had planned to sell its stake in the plant,
but Freeman said Riordan ordered him to back out of the sale.
?????He described the mayor's move as a sign that Riordan and his appointees
on the board that oversees DWP were "completely insensitive to the fact that
that power plant is one of the most environmentally troubling plants in the
West."
?????"I've worked real hard to try to build some environmental sensitivity
into the DWP policy," Freeman said. "And I am concerned as to whether the
current commissioners and the mayor have that sensitivity, and what they
might do in the interim to basically overturn the progress we've made."
?????The other plant is part of the Intermountain Power Project in central
Utah. Riordan has proposed building a new coal-fired generating unit there,
but Freeman said he objected because of the pollution it would cause.
?????In both cases, Riordan said he was striking the appropriate balance
between protecting the environment and meeting the energy needs of Los
Angeles at an affordable cost. By keeping its share of the Mohave plant and
expanding the Utah plant, Los Angeles can avert the astronomical price hikes
of natural gas--and the sharp rise in ratepayers' bills that would follow,
Riordan said.
?????Natural gas, which provides 26% of the fuel for DWP plants, causes less
air pollution than coal, which provides 51%. The rest is mainly nuclear and
hydroelectric. Los Angeles has averted rate hikes and blackouts in part
because the DWP relies less on natural gas than most other California power
providers.
?????"I favor clean air and more natural gas, but not to the point where
we're going to destroy the economy of Los Angeles," Riordan said.
?????On the Mohave plant, Riordan questioned the benefit of selling the
city's share to a buyer that would simply continue running it.
?????"It's still going to be coal-driven," he said. "How does selling it help
the environment?"
?????The tension between the two has built steadily as the state power crisis
has worsened. With the charismatic DWP chief drawing favorable news coverage
in stories on how L.A. has dodged the crisis, Riordan and the DWP
commissioners began to view him as "too big for my britches," Freeman said.
?????The conflict reached its peak on April 17, the day Freeman resigned to
become the governor's advisor. The DWP board president, Kenneth T. Lombard,
said the mayor told commissioners that day that "it made the most sense to
release him immediately."
?????"All we were doing, frankly, was release him from his responsibilities,
and then whatever time he needed to clean out his office was fine with us,"
Lombard said.
?????From Riordan's standpoint, Freeman needed to be stripped of his
authority right away because of a potential conflict of interest: The city
utility sells surplus power to the state, so Freeman would be on both sides
of the sales.
?????Freeman, who had voluntarily bowed out of a DWP meeting on the state
power crisis earlier that day, was outraged at his sudden release, in part
because he was denied the chance to say goodbye to agency employees. In an
interview, he called the conflict of interest assertion "complete malarkey."
?????"The insinuation that I have done anything less than protect the
interests of the city of Los Angeles is bordering on slanderous, considering
what I've accomplished here," he said.
?????Brian D'Arcy, who heads the union local that represents 6,000 DWP
employees, agreed that Riordan and his commissioners "kind of ran him out of
here. For David to be summarily jettisoned out of here without even a
howdy-do is absolutely tacky," D'Arcy said.
?????Riordan said Freeman deserves "an A-plus" for his work at DWP. The mayor
conceded that he knew of nothing that Freeman had done "to hurt Los Angeles."
But, he added, "when you have a conflict of interest, you have to act before
anything happens."
?????Freeman has long bridled at the oversight of DWP, not just by the mayor,
but by the agency's board and the City Council. In 1998, he called for City
Charter amendments to consolidate authority in a more independent board of
directors. The proposal went nowhere.
?????Freeman's concerns were echoed in a report to be released Monday. The
Rand Enterprise Analysis report was commissioned by the DWP. It calls for
restructuring DWP management much the way Freeman proposed. But Riordan and
Galanter, who chairs the Council's Commerce, Energy and Natural Resources
Committee, rejected the concept. Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times


The following items were presented in this week's corporate change control....

Feb. 21
From 11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., Enron Network Services will re-address the IP structure for Enron Aviation.  This change is to facilitate the establishment of an interim disaster recovery site for ETS.  The aviation network will experience intermittent outages during this maintenance.  No impact to ETS is expected.
Feb. 21
From 4:00 - 5:00 p.m., the Corporate Infrastructure team will establish a one-way trust been UBS and corp.enron.com.  No impact is expected.
Feb. 22
From 7:00 - 8:00 p.m., Facilities will conduct their regularly scheduled maintenance on the backup water chillers.  No impact is expected.
Feb. 23
From 7:00 - 8:15 p.m., Telephony Services will perform maintenance on the ATM links between ECN and ECS.  No impact is expected.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


Teco Tap       60.000 / Enron ; 90.000 . HPL Gas Daily


PEP - weekend support

For assistance with any PEP problems this weekend please contact the Houston
PEP Support desk on
 +1 713-853-4777 Option 4 for 24 hour assistance.


Please add to your list of nightly duties the following:

 When we print the New Deal Summary, also export it to excel.
 Open the Excel File and sort by CPName.
 Delet


Market Participants,

Attention: Settlements and Scheduling Personnel

Your participation is requested in the second iteration of 10-Minute
Settlement Market Simulation.

As communicated on 7/20/00, the ISO has postponed the August 1, 2000,
implementation of 10-minute settlements in order to accommodate additional
end-to-end testing and market simulation.  The ISO's new target for
implementation is the last week of August, 2000, contingent upon the
successful completion of the second 10-Minute Settlement Market Simulation
and ISO's 10 day written notice to FERC.

The second 10-Minute Settlement Market Simulation is scheduled to begin on
Tuesday, August 1, 2000.  The ISO will hold a kickoff meeting conference
call on Thursday, July 27, from 1:30 - 3:00 p.m., to summarize the status of
the first Market Simulation, discuss the second Market Simulation logistics,
and review the Market Simulation Plan.

All Market Participants are strongly urged to participate in this simulation
to identify any outstanding issues that may affect implementation for
Scheduling Coordinators and the ISO.

Please respond to Cathy Young at cyoung@caiso.com by 3:00 p.m. on Friday if
you intend to participate.  The remainder of this message contains the
kickoff meeting Agenda, Market Simulation Schedule, and necessary system set
up documentation for the simulation.

10 MINUTE SETTLEMENT MARKET SIMULATION II
KICKOFF CONFERENCE CALL
July 27, 1:30 - 3:00 p.m.
Conference Number 877-670-4111
Passcode 246870
Agenda:
* Review of first Market Simulation
* System Requirements
* ADS
* SI
* Metering
* Meter Data
* Refer to attached document: Metering August Mkt Sim1
* MDAS Online work around
* Schedule Data Requirements
* RMR dispatch
* OOS
* Interties predispatch
* SC provide all DA market and supplemental energy bid data

Proposed Market Simulation Schedule (refer to attached Detailed Test Plan)
* Monday , July 31 ADS/SI/Metering connectivity
* Tuesday, August 1    DA market run for td 8/2/00
* Wednesday, August 2 Real time market for td 8/2/00 (HE 11 -- 17)

  DA market run for td 8/3/00
* Thursday, August 3 Real time market for td 8/3/00 (HE 11 -- 17)
* Friday, August 4 Run settlements for 8/2/00
* Monday, August 7 Run settlements for 8/3/00
  Publish settlements for 8/2/00
* Tuesday, August 8  Publish settlements for 8/3/00
* Wednesday, August 9 Market Participant Review
* Thursday, August 10 Market Participant Review
* Friday, August 11 Conference call to review market sim.

Attached please find the following documentation for your use in setting up
your systems for Market Simulation.

a.  ADS Market Simulation Configuration
b.  ADS_PAR Installation
c.  Software Configuration for SI Development System

It is important that you use this information to prepare your system setup
ASAP.  It may be necessary to have your IT department allow traffic through
your firewalls to and from the ADS market simulation IP address and port.
Please refer to the ADS Market Simulation Configuration document for
detailed instructions.

If you are interested in verbally receiving RMR pre-dispatches during the
market simulation, please let Cathy Young know when you sign up.

You may contact Christine Vangelatos at cvangelatos@caiso.com or (916)
351-2142 if you have any questions or concerns regarding ADS or SI
configuration.

CRCommunications
Client Relations Communications

 <<ADS Market Simulation Configuration Instructions.doc>>  <<ADS_PAR
Installation.ppt>>  <<CONFIGUREdev1_.doc>>  <<10-min Market Simulation Test
Script 2.doc>>  <<Metering August Mkt Sim.doc>>

 - ADS Market Simulation Configuration Instructions.doc
 - ADS_PAR Installation.ppt
 - CONFIGUREdev1_.doc
 - 10-min Market Simulation Test Script 2.doc
 - Metering August Mkt Sim.doc