I get possesion Sept.20

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE:

6 blocks up, 6 blocks over,

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:20 PM
To: RLaird@natsource.ca
Subject: RE:

Where is you place? It is pretty close to there isn't it.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:38 AM
   To:     Dorland, Chris
   Subject:  RE:

   Sweet, don't forget river park, the tropicana and marda loop, let alone
   my
   favorite icecream store. Sweet, I like those places, walked through one
   about a year ago. Good work. Congrats. I'll have to take you to the trop
   for
   a few beers and some pizza....lets not forget the library, firehall and
   sand
   volleyball courts (chickas) right up the road

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:35 AM
   To: RLaird@natsource.ca
   Subject: RE:

   I like that area. Nice and quiet. 6 blocks to Original Joe's. Didn't
   have
   the carrot cake but the soup was excellent.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
      Sent:   Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:32 AM
      To:     Dorland, Chris
      Subject:  RE:

      Nice, did you have the carrot cake? Sept 15th, hmm I'll put my party
      dress
      on.....

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
      Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:32 AM
      To: RLaird@natsource.ca
      Subject: RE:

      I had lunch at bell's cafe yesterday. They are the red brick
   townhouses
      on
      14a st. Moving back Sept. 15.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
         Sent:   Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:25 AM
         To:     Dorland, Chris
         Subject:  RE:

         Are those the townhouses near bells cafe, behind the tropicana?

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
         Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:02 AM
         To: RLaird@natsource.ca
         Subject: RE:

         Hey there neighbor. Bought a house this weekend #401 3511 14a st.
      That
         is
         pretty close to you place isn't it. You'll have to drive by and
   check
      it
         out.

         Chris

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
            Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:59 PM
            To:     Dorland, Chris
            Subject:  RE:

            Oh well, more fish in the sea, Oh well.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
            Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:47 PM
            To: RLaird@natsource.ca
            Subject: RE:

            I just heard from a mutual friend that Kerrie Murray got
   engaged
            recently.
            Scratch that one off the list of possibles.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
               Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:03 PM
               To:     Dorland, Chris
               Subject:  RE:

               Funny that's what I was thinking...

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
   [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
               Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:25 AM
               To: RLaird@natsource.ca
               Subject: RE:

               I was thinking of converting it to a hover vehicle. I might
      just
         sell
               the
               car and get you to drive me around all winter.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:02 PM
                  To:     Dorland, Chris
                  Subject:  RE:

                  How about skidoo skis for the front and tracks for the
      back..

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
      [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
                  Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:00 AM
                  To: RLaird@natsource.ca
                  Subject: RE:

                  Lexus IS 300. Not sure if I am going to buy 17" or 16"
      wheels
         for
            the
                  winter. Jackass.

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
                     Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:54 AM
                     To:     Dorland, Chris
                     Subject:  RE:

                     Not sure about the wheels, I believe he sells some
      recycled
            from
               used
                     furnaces...I'll check on the tires, what's it for,
   model
         etc,
            do
               you
                     have
                     tire size?

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
         [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
                     Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:52 AM
                     To: RLaird@natsource.ca
                     Subject: RE:

                     If you are bored try to find out what your tire guy
      thinks
         of
               Dunlop
                     Winter
                     Sport M2 tires. Is you tire guy also a wheel guy? I
   need
         some
               winter
                     wheels
                     as well.

                         -----Original Message-----
                        From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
                        Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:43 AM
                        To:     Dorland, Chris
                        Subject:  RE:

                        Keep out of that fat category, that's all mine.....

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
            [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
                        Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:43 AM
                        To: RLaird@natsource.ca
                        Subject: RE:

                        I was confused by your use of 2 spellings. Did you
      like
         my
               Austin
                        Power's
                        reference? "I know. That's how we do it in Belgium.
      It's
            called
               a
                        Belgium
                        dip" You are back in my good graces. Try not to
      confuse
         the
               dumb
                  fat
                        kid.

                            -----Original Message-----
                           From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
                           Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:37 AM
                           To:     Dorland, Chris
                           Subject:  RE:

                           Wasn't questioning the chica's, like the term,
         thinking
            out
                  loud
                     as
                        to
                           any
                           available on the scene for the kid....

                           -----Original Message-----
                           From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
               [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
                           Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:34 AM
                           To: RLaird@natsource.ca
                           Subject: RE:

                           Fuck you. That's how we spell it in Belgium.

                               -----Original Message-----
                              From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
                              Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:29 AM
                              To:     Dorland, Chris
                              Subject:  RE:

                              With open arms...Chica's? I was at a wedding
      this
            weekend
                  with
                        tons
                           of
                              chika's it was ridiculous....

                              -----Original Message-----
                              From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
                  [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
                              Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:27 AM
                              To: RLaird@natsource.ca
                              Subject: RE:

                              Coming to town Thursday for the weekend and
         hopefully
               moving
                  by
                        the
                              middle
                              of September. Spending Friday house shopping.
   I
         think
            I
               am
                     going
                        to
                           end
                              up
                              in your neck of the woods. Seems like the
   best
         values
            are
               in
                     that
                           area.
                              Are
                              we going to get some snow this winter? We
   need
      to
         find
                  Dorland
                     a
                           date. I
                              am
                              going to a wedding this weekend and there
   should
      be
            lots
               of
                     single
                              chicas
                              there. I am really looking forward to being
   back
      in
            Cow
                  town.
                        Houston
                           is
                              painfull.

                              Later

                              cd

                                  -----Original Message-----
                                 From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>
   @ENRON
                                 Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:12 AM
                                 To:     Dorland, Chris
                                 Subject:

                                 Sucka, when you coming to towne?

   **********************************************************************
                              This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp.
      and/or
         its
                  relevant
                           affiliate
                              and
                              may contain confidential and privileged
   material
         for
            the
                  sole
                     use
                        of
                           the
                              intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
         distribution
            or
                        disclosure
                           by
                              others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
      the
               intended
                        recipient
                           (or
                              authorized to receive for the recipient),
   please
            contact
               the
                        sender
                           or
                              reply
                              to Enron Corp. at
               enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
                  and
                        delete
                              all
                              copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
            attachments
                  hereto)
                        are
                           not
                              intended to be an offer (or an acceptance)
   and
      do
         not
               create
                  or
                           evidence
                              a
                              binding and enforceable contract between
   Enron
         Corp.
            (or
               any
                  of
                        its
                              affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
      other
               party,
                  and
                     may
                           not
                              be
                              relied on by anyone as the basis of a
   contract
      by
               estoppel
                  or
                           otherwise.
                              Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


PLEASE SEE ATTACHED MEMO W/ATTACHMENTS.


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW0028  OCT 16,2001       2:01 PACIFIC      05:01 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) Texas prepares for Power Deregulation,
in an Advisory by Industrialinfo.com

    Business Editors

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 16, 2001--The following is an
advisory by Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources Inc.;
Houston, Texas) Texas residents and businesses are preparing for
deregulation that begins in the state on January 1, 2002 by educating
themselves on how electric provider choices can benefit them.
Depending on your geographical location, savings are being forecasted
between $14-$21 per month depending on your electric provider.
	   The Texas plan ranks among the best in the country in its approach
to electric restructuring through reasons like uniform business
practices and codes of conduct that were not present during the
deregulation of California. The state is primed for a successful
transition into a competitive electric retail market and other states
are watching as well to see how smoothly the transition proceeds.
	   Others hoping to benefit from deregulation are the Private Energy
Producers (PEP's) who will construct and operate new power plants
across the state. The Calpine's, Duke Energy's and the Kinder Morgan
Power's of the world will replace familiar utility company names like
Reliant Energy, American Electric Power and TXU Electric on electric
bills.
	   The majority of Texans will be able to choose a new Retail
Electric Provider (REP) as of January 1, 2002 and up to 5% of
customers are getting a head start on electric choice by participating
in a pilot program. Customers can pick and choose a provider based on
whether they want to save money, support environmentally friendly
sources of generation, seek better customer service, or stay with a
brand name they know and trust.
	   In Texas alone, Industrialinfo.com is tracking 49 PEP projects.
These projects are in various phases of development from planned,
engineered and under construction. In all, these projects represent
some 33,447MW of electric generation capacity and have an estimated
construction value of over $19.6 billion. Industrialinfo.com
speculates all 49 new power plants to be on-line by 2006.
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including industry alerts and databases for the energy
and industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities for the Energy and Power markets as well as
other industrial sectors send inquiries to
powergroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us at www.industrialinfo.com.

    --30--AS/na*

    CONTACT: Industrial Information Resources Inc., Houston
             Joseph Govreau, 713/783-5147

    KEYWORD: TEXAS
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: ENERGY UTILITIES
    SOURCE: Industrial Information Resources Inc.

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


Thanks anyway.  I have some information that Darron kept on Cilco, I am still
having trouble finding any deals for 98 that can show me we definitely did or
did not flash these deals wrong.  I am going to keep working on it.
PL


Do not update links when opening this file.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Adam Johnson
EnronOnline
x54877


Deb,

Let's go ahead with POA's for Ben F. Jacoby for ENA, Tarheel Land
Development, Edgecombe Development, and Titan Land Development in accordance
with Janet's request and ENA standard practice. Deb, I have the impression
that this is something you typically handle, although I'm glad to volunteer
Kathleen for the task if that would help.

There will be other companies, but we can add these as we go.  Kathleen,
please advise if there are any which you see as most active at this time. For
instance, what are the names of the Florida development companies?

Your assistance is greatly appreciated, as Janet is eager to get this done.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:20
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           10/08/2000 07:59 PM

To: Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Signature authority

Deb,

I'll get you the particulars, but you get the general idea. I'll have to
check on the expense account stuff.

Kathleen, you  haven't done any thing with this request yet, have you?  Could
you get the  names of the active development companies so that we can address
those, as well as ENA?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/08/2000 07:56
PM ---------------------------

Janet R Dietrich@ECT
10/08/2000 02:22 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Signature authority

Kay, as we discussed previously:

Effective immediately, I would like Ben Jacoby to have signature authority
for his team's expense reports as well as all documents whose capital
commitments are not greater than $250,000. Most documents will be
confidentiality agreements, exclusivity agreements, permit applications, and
land/equipment option agreements.

Please forward this (if need be) to the appropriate internal individuals who
get this set up. Thanks Kay.


You're probably gone anyway.  I'll think of this as "my note in a bottle".

Stumpy and his wife Martha went to the state fair every year. Every year
Stumpy would say, "Martha, I'd like to ride in that there airplane." And
every year Martha would say, "I know Stumpy, but that airplane ride costs
ten dollars, and ten dollars is ten dollars."

One year Stumpy and Martha went to the fair and Stumpy said, "Martha, I'm
71 years old. If I don't ride that airplane this year I may never get
another chance." Martha replied, "Stumpy that there airplane ride costs ten
dollars, and ten dollars is ten dollars."

The pilot overheard them and said, "Folks, I'll make you a deal. I'll take
you both up for a ride. If you can stay quiet for the entire ride and not
say one word, I won't charge you, but if you say one word it's ten
dollars."

Stumpy and Martha agreed and up they go. The pilot does all kinds of twists
and turns, rolls and dives, but not a word is heard. He does all his tricks
over again, but still not a word.

They land and the pilot turns to Stumpy, "By golly, I did everything I
could think of to get you to yell out, but you didn't." Stumpy replied,
"Well, I was gonna say something when Martha fell out, but ten dollars is
ten dollars."


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 11/19/01.   The Yuma Companies (Inc.) has been added to this week's "Call Credit" column.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923,  Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436.


---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 11/10/2000 08:18
AM ---------------------------

Steven McCabe <steven_mccabe@yahoo.com> on 11/10/2000 08:06:44 AM
To: Todd Wheeler <tmwheeler@wiserco.com>, Drew Wilkinson <lsumba@yahoo.com>,
Bob Wood <bgwood@tntech.edu>, Shanna Husser <Shanna.Husser@enron.com>,
Shannon Johnson <shannon.l.johnson@ac.com>, Leslie H King
<lhkiii@hotmail.com>, David Lennon <David.Lennon@ipaper.com>, Alex Massa
<Alex_Massa@tcsmgmt.com>, Mom <pmm414@aol.com>, Johnny Moore
<mercury728@home.com>, Matt Morley <matthew_morley@metro.nashville.org>,
Malcolm Rios <speaktheword@hotmail.com>, Matt Rodgers <mattr@barriere.com>,
Jarrod Ruez <j_ruez@yahoo.com>, Suzanne Sevier <suzannesevier@hotmail.com>,
Julie Shaulis <julie_shaulis@caradon.com>, Tim Belcher <TimB-Art@webtv.net>,
Julie Beloate <julie.beloate@ey.com>, James Bendele
<James.Bendele@HSV.Boeing.com>, Jay Bowman <bowmanja@us.ibm.com>, Rob Shelley
Brown <robshell@gateway.net>, Julia Carruth <jchosea@fedex.com>, Ashley
Craddock <ashley.craddock@ac.com>, Richard Curran <Rjctiger@aol.com>, Dad
<tmccabe450@aol.com>, David B Ellis <dbellis@us.ibm.com>, Ashley Font
<afont@nol.net>, David Frey <davefrey@us.ibm.com>, Jill Gilmore
<jgilmore@ldmtech.com>, Gregory Gleaves <gleaves@hotmail.com>, Jane Gleaves
<SaraJaneCG@aol.com>, Joe Gleaves <JCGleaves@aol.com>, Kevin Hix
<kahix@postsmart.net>, Andy Hogue <achogue@yahoo.com>
cc: David Kulmann <kulmann@us.ibm.com>
Subject: If you have 5 minutes

If you have 5 minutes today and need a laugh, I offer
the following number.

Democrats set up a toll-free number (1-800-579-8871)
where Florida voters could report irregularities. Feel
free to call and tell them that if the Democratic
Voters are too stupid to figure out the ballot and how
to vote for President, then they shouldn't be allowed
to vote.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


thanks Vince.   I read about this in MW Daily and on Bloomberg.   I think it will be a good project.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	FW: Neptune -- merchant transmission

Kevin,

Please, take a look at the link to the website
describing the Neptune project (a merchant transmission
DC line from Canada and Maine to  NE). The link is embedded in one of the messages below.

The Neptune Regional Electrical Transmission System will connect rapidly growing, electric-load centers in New York City, downtown Boston, and the Connecticut and New Jersey shores with clean and efficient electric generating facilities in Eastern Canada and Maine.

Employing state of the art, environmentally proven sub-sea cable technology, the Neptune System will overcome constraints to the existing land-based electric transmission grid which hinder the efficient use of energy resources along the Mid and North Atlantic seaboard.

Any interest?

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cunningham, Lance
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:36 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Neptune -- merchant transmission

Vince,

Interestingly enough I have just spoken with Walter Coffer about an undersea project that Enron may be undertaking to take power from Canada to the New England area.  I'd like to talk with you about this when you have an opportunity.

Lance

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:22 AM
To:	Cunningham, Lance
Subject:	FW: Neptune -- merchant transmission

Lance,

Who would be the right person on the trading desk to take a look at it?

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Edward+20Krapels+22+20+3Cekrapels+40esaibos+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 5:24 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Neptune -- merchant transmission

Thanks Vince... We'll be auctioning off transmission rights in these
corridors in September (assuming FERC approves our filing), which confronts
traders with a complex array of valuation problems (the long-term value of
the right to ship energy along these DC pathways and to collect ancillary
services in each of the markets). It's a conceptually difficult challenge
for most companies but I'm sure Enron is all over it. We'll be interested in
whether or not Enron's traders participate in this auction.

We are also pre-selling some of the capacity in negotiations over the
summer, in the expectation of FERC approval of that concept (kind of an
anchor tenant concept).

As you will recall, we did approach Enron early on in the project (a fellow
in Calgary whose name I cannot remember) and he indicated no interest. I'll
keep you in the loop because I suspect you'll find the intellectual
challenge intriguing -- what is access to DC capacity worth? --- as I do.

Hope things are going well in all of your markets!

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaminski, Vince J [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:31 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Subject: RE: Neptune -- merchant transmission

Hello Ed,

It sounds very interesting. I forwarded your messages
to two members of my group who work on the problems related
to transmission (a key to the power markets successful
growth).

I shall share with you their  reaction.

I hope everything is going well.

Vince

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Edward+20Krapels+22+20+3Cekrapels+40esaibos+2Eco
> m+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 5:12 AM
> To:	Vincent Kaminski \(E-mail\)
> Subject:	Neptune -- merchant transmission
>
> Dear Vince,
>
> Greetings from Boston... In the last year, I've been associated with
> the
> Neptune merchant transmission project... check it out at
> www.NeptuneRTS.com.
> We filed with FERC last week and I'm sending you the Wall Street
> Journal and
> Megawatt Daily articles on it.
>
> Have you seen any good analytical work on merchant transmission? I'm
> in a
> dialogue with Paul Joskow and others on this issue but as always would
> appreciate your thoughts.
>
> All the best,
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> Edward N. Krapels, PhD
> Director
> ESAI Power and Gas Services
> tel 781 245 2036
> cell 617 899 4948
> ekrapels@esaibos.com
> www.esai.com
>
>
>  - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>

 - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001
09:11 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/11/2001 09:00 AM
To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek Bailey/ENRON@enronXgate, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/ENRON@enronXgate, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Pernul/CAL/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda
Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tiffany Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--5/11/01


- G

Could you send the cover letter with your revisions?  I'll go ahead and make
it specific to each counterparty.

Thanks,
Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


I'm running behind and will try to review first thing in the a.m.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	"Yaish, Yair (OGC)" <YYaish@exchange.ml.com>
	04/10/2001 07:46 AM

		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Sara, any thoughts on my comments ISDA I sent out last week?

-----Original Message-----
From: Yaish, Yair (OGC)
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:19 PM
To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Sara, I have good news, I think we are very close to executing this baby.

I am attahcing comments to the ISDA.  They reflect comments by our outside
cousel which highlight the differences between this contract and the side
letter/ML ISDA.  They are not much.  I have also made some changes directly
on their draft where I either concurred with Enron or needed to make some of
my own changes.  Pls review and let me know what you think.

I will be leaving the office soon, so if we can wrap it up tomorrow that
would be great (I'm out Monday for Passover).

Yair Yaish
Director and Senior Counsel
Allegheny Energy Global Markets, LLC
212-236-7346

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:10 PM
To: yyaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:

Attached is a blacklined (against the Enron North America Corp. draft of
3/15/01) Schedule and Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex.  I
have tried to incorporate the essence of the March 19, 2001 "swap side
letter agreement."  Please call me to discuss as it would be nice to
finalize by April 6.  Thanks.

(See attached file: 098a Blackline ctr (Allegheny Energy Supply).doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040723.txt


fyi...

Read this!-

Subject: Medicine Recall

> All drugs containing Phenylpropanolamine are
> being recalled. You may want to try calling the 800
> number listed on most drug boxes and inquire about
> a REFUND.
>
> Please read this CAREFULLY, as I know that some
> of you may USE some of these drugs (Alka Seltzer Plus
> for one).
>
> Also, please pass this on to everyone you know.
> STOP TAKING anything containing this ingredient. It
> has been linked to increased hemorrhagic stroke
> (bleeding in brain) among women ages 18-49 in the
> three days
> after starting use of medication. Problems were not
> found in men, but the FDA recommended that everyone
> (even children) seek alternative medicine.
>
> The following medications contain Phenylpropanolamine:
> Acutrim Diet Gum Appetite Suppressant Plus Dietary
> Supplements
> Acutrim Maximum Strength Appetite Control
> Alka-Seltzer Plus Children's Cold Medicine
> Effervescent
> Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold medicine (cherry or
> orange)
> Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold Medicine Original
> Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Cough Medicine
> Effervescent
> Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Flu Medicine Effervescent
> Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Sinus Effervescent
> Alka Seltzer Plus Night-Time Cold Medicine
> Effervescent
> BC Allergy Sinus Cold Powder
> BC Sinus Cold Powder
> Comtrex Deep Chest Cold & Congestion Relief
> Comtrex Flu Therapy & Fever Relief
> Day & Night Contac 12-Hour Cold Capsules
> Contac 12 Hour Caplets
> Coricidin D Cold, Flu & Sinus
> Dexatrim Caffeine Free
> Dexatrim Extended Duration
> Dexatrim Gelcaps
> Dexatrim Vitamin C/Caffeine Free
> Dimetapp Cold & Allergy Chewable Tablets
> Dimetapp Cold & Cough Liqui-Gels
> Dimetapp DM Cold & Cough Elixir
> Dimetapp Elixir
> Dimetapp 4 Hour Liquid Gels
> Dimetapp 4 Hour Tablets
> Dimetapp 12 Hour Extentabs Tablets
> Naldecon DX Pediatric Drops
> Permathene Mega-16
> Robitussin CF
> Tavist-D 12 Hour Relief of Sinus & Nasal Congestion
> Triaminic DM Cough Relief
> Triaminic Expectorant Chest & Head Congestion
> Triaminic Syrup Cold & Allergy
> Triaminic Triaminicol Cold & Cough
>
> I just found out and called the 800# on the container
> for Triaminic and they informed me that they are
> voluntarily recalling the following medicines because
> of a certain ingredient that
> is causing strokes and seizures in children:
>
> Orange 3D Cold & Allergy Cherry (Pink)
> 3D Cold & Cough Berry
> 3D Cough Relief
> Yellow 3D Expectorant
> They are asking you to call them at 800-548-3708 with
> the lot number on the box so they can send you postage
> for you to send it back to
> them, and they will also issue you a refund.
>
> If you know of anyone else with small children, PLEASE
> PASS THIS ON. THIS IS SERIOUS STUFF.
>
> PLEASE PASS ALONG TO ALL ON YOUR MAILING LIST so
> people are informed.  They can then pass it along to
> their families. To confirm these findings please take
> time to
> check the following URL:
>
> http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/ppa/default.htm
>
>


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	EB2386 - Power Trading Audit - Opening Mtg.

Date:		5/22/2001
Time:		10:00 AM - 11:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:

Nicole Mendez


Thanks for your response.  I was wondering if you guys have public information about the spill program coming up.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Mosey, Edward - KC-7" <efmosey@bpa.gov>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Mosey+2C+20Edward+20-+20KC-7+22+20+3Cefmosey+40bpa+2Egov+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 4:20 PM
To:	Crandall, Sean
Subject:	you called?

Sean, how can we help you?

Ed Mosey


Mark,

Barbara, Anne, and Mark G. are not available.  Any other possibilities??

hk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Greenberg, Mark
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:19 PM
To:	Keiser, Holly
Subject:	RE: ENW Staff Meeting

Holly -

I have meetings both right before and right after lunch.  I would not be able to attend the entire meeting.  It is probably best if someone else is available if they could attend.

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Holly
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Greenberg, Mark
Subject:	FW: ENW Staff Meeting

Mark.... Anne can't make it this meeting.  Would you be available?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Holly
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Koehler, Anne C.
Subject:	FW: ENW Staff Meeting

Anne:

Mark will not be available to attend this meeting and asked if you would attend in his place.

Thank you,
Holly

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chisley, Katherine
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:17 AM
To:	Barnard, Marla; Beck, Sally; Beffer, Michele; Brandli, Christina; Cannon, Lydia; Chun, Inja; Costello, Lisa; Cromwell, Sheri L.; Dayao, Anthony; Douglas, Stephen H.; Escamilla, Grisela; Estrada, Mercedes E.; Farrell, Keegan; Flores-Cuellar, Brenda; Gray, Barbara N.; Gros, Thomas D.; Hotte, Steve; Houser, Rita; Hritz, Alice; Kanellopoulos, Drew; Keiser, Holly; Lapsley, Carol; Perlman, Beth; Pickering, Mark; Richter, Brad; Roper, Kerry; Rub, Jenny; Shelby, Rex; Sommer, Allan; Spiller, Tina; Stone, Sandy; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Valdez, Christina; Weatherstone, Mary; Webb, Jay; Westbrook, Cherylene R.
Subject:	ENW Staff Meeting

The ENW staff meeting will be held on Thursday, October 18, 12:00 p.m. in EB27C2.  Assistants, please let me know if your executive will be attending, not attending, or participating via teleconference.

Thanks,
Katherine Chisley
x58463


Larry, I notice a posting for ENA East Power Service DE position in your
area.  I would appreciate if you could give me a call concerning the position
and any insights you may have about the Power Desk.  Also, if you could
forward my resume to Edwin Coulter, it would be greatly appreciated.  Please
keep this confidential.  Thanks, Jay


Hey Clement & Ben, got your calls -- sorry haven't returned them yet, but I'm
swamped this week --> LM6000 marathon-o-rama. How's tomorrow afternoon
sometime 3-5pm? If there are no rooms available in EB, I can probably get one
over here in 3AC fairly easily. We can review both estimates if you like. Let
me know if this works for you all.

Clement Lau@ECT
02/02/2000 05:30 PM
To: Scot Chambers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Santee Cooper Project Preliminary O&M Estimate

Scot:

I would like to further discuss the analysis and format you have provided us
for Lincoln and Santee Cooper. Besides me, I might include George McCormick,
Ben Rogers, and Doug Sewell in the meeting.

Please let me know your availability and I would set up a meeting room.
Thanks.

Scot Chambers@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/24/2000 10:17 PM
To: George McCormick@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Clement Lau@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Doug Sewell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benjamin
Rogers@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Richard Bickings/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Callaghan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark
Dobler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mitch
Robinson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Santee Cooper Project Preliminary O&M Estimate

George, please find attached the subject preliminary O&M estimate -- consider
it with an accuracy of +/- 25% at best. Please review and call should you
have questions.  regards, Scot


We did talk about the creation of these new positions within gas support.  I
have also discussed this at length with Brent, and agree that the shift of
manager positions to front to back looks across each region (eliminating the
OA and Deal Validation manager roles) makes sense.  Upon the recommendation
of Susan and Brent, I am comfortable with appointing Jeff Gossett as the
manager of the West region.

Kim Melodick
04/17/2000 10:46 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reorganization/Promotion

Susan indicated that she had a conversation with you about these promotions.
Are you comfortable going forward with them?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2000 11:38
AM ---------------------------

Susan Harrison
04/14/2000 03:49 PM
To: Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Reorganization/Promotion

We are in the process of reorganizing several functional groups within Gas
Operations.  With this change, we want to promote Jeff Gossett to Manager
effective May 1.  The following describes the reorganization and
justification for the promotion.

The Risk Management, Operational Analysis, Transport Rates and Deal
Validation groups will be realigned into four regional teams and managed by
Business Controllers.  There will also be a centralized Controls group with
2-3 individuals that will be managed by a different Business Controller.
With this realignment, we are creating five new manager positions (four
regional and one Controls) and eliminating the two manager positions for the
Deal Validation and the Operational Analysis/Transport Rates groups.  The
regional Business Controllers will be responsible for managing the day-to-day
activities of their regional teams, including interacting with the Trading
Desk Directors, and the Controls manager will work across the regional teams
to ensure consistency and efficiency in our processes.

The new Controller positions will be filled as follows:

West - Jeff Gossett
Central - Carrie Hollomon
East - Will Kelly (Senior Specialist)
Controls - Kathryn Cordes
Texas - TBD (Brenda Herod to hire)

We are promoting Jeff Gossett at this time due to the responsibilities he
will be carrying in the Controller role in addition to his current
responsibilities for the NGP&L and Benchmark functions.

Will Kelly's performance will be evaluated during the next few months to
determine if he will be the permanent Controller for the East region.  If he
performs well in this role, mid-year promotion will be pursued.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  I will follow-up next week to
discuss a salary adjustment for Jeff Gossett.

Thanks,

Susan


since the siting legislation created only a program that is voluntary and not
in place of the existing laws, and we have a committment from the
legislature, the CEC and the govenor's office to take another shot in
January, as they know that this legislation is flawed, too many conflicting
interests trying to solve a complex problem in too short a time, I feel this
is too harsh...we have already started the process of creating new
legislation, that will be as close to a consensus as possible for next
session..this legislation did not hurt us, and, some companies feel that they
can use the processes.  We have to keep in mind that with the knowledge that
there will be major reorganization legislation next year, we don't want to
offend the friends that we have in Sacramento, particularly the Republicans
who were the ones who insisted on an expedited siting bill


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042717.txt


Hi Bill,

I know you have been out and I will be out all next week so I will e-mail
these to you.

May 18th    HE 12 sale to PNM the 40 needs to be a 45 @ $120.00
May 18th    Got the note from "you all" that HE 16 PNM Cont, they show 0
and you show 13.  Need to know who is correct on this.
May 20th    Purchase totals not adding up
May 21st    Change HE 13 sale to PNM to a 20

and

May 13th   An on-peak schedule -32@Amrad ran on Sunday (13th) and shouldn't
have.  PSCO had done a month long tag that was incorrect.
                     What we agreed on was to by the -32 HE 7-22 @ $30.00
from them.  Need you to please add this to the model and ENPOWER as a
                      real-time deal.

If you have any questions, Roger will be filling in for me.

Thanks,

Kathy


This has replaced the previously scheduled meeting.


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; SMITH, Douglas; Lavorato, John; Black, Don; Forster, David; Duran, W. David; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Foster, Chris H.; Black, Tamara Jae; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Furrow, Dale; Meyn, Jim; Harvey, Claudette; Presto, Kevin M.; Jacoby, Ben
Subject: FW: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

FYI.

TJ and Claudette--Please forward to your groups.  Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:46 PM

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

 General Observations

 The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

 FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Attached is a contact list for the PR Department and IR Department through the Thanksgiving weekend.


The report named: Power/Gas Heat Rates <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=21&report_name=Power/Gas+Heat+Rates&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/25/2001>, published as of 10/25/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)


Tana

We would like an NDA for the following counterparty:

Agilon Technologies, Inc.
Attn:  Mr. Paul S. Galant
14180 Dallas Parkway
Dallas, TX  75240
gpreston@agilon.com

Nature of business - Enron Net Works L.L.C. is hoping to have Agilon perform
Transaction Hub Service functions for EOL.  Agilon has software that would
fit nicely on top of EOL and help our trading counterparts more easily
download and create their own trading reports as a result of their
transacting with EOL.

Please email the NDA to me and you can send the hard copy out directly to Mr
Galant.

No know legal contact at Agilon yet.

Muchas Gracias Herrin Jones!

Johan

John Allario
Enron Net Works L.L.C.
713-853-4587 (o)
713-562-8684 (c)
john.allario@enron.com


Attached is a brief proposal for economics arguments against the CPUC's
proposal for load based price caps.  Obviously, these arguments would also
apply to the ISO Board's recent decision.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 03:00 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com>
              10/27/2000 10:58 AM

To: <mary.hain@enron.com>
cc: <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>
Subject: Motion for Interim Relief by CPUC

Mary:

cc: Ron, Jim

I have had a quick read-through of the CPUC Motion, as requested. There
would appear to be two salient points.

1) CPUC asks for FERC to impose strict load-differentiated price caps. These
would be imposed using a formula based on "margina1 heat rates" times an
index gas price. So the maximum cap would be around $100 and the minimum
could be quite low off-peak - more like $30-40/MWh. Needless to say this
does not recognize the opportunity costs of power in other markets. It was
also completely make redundant any trading into California. The prices would
rise immediately to the low caps, so there would be no incentive for anyone
to enter into any commerical hedging arrangements. The mechanism is
basically similar to the old SRAC QF contracts, but without the capacity
payments.

2) CPUC asks that FERC require all jurisdictional generators AND marketers
to offer forwards contracts for a substantial portion of their capacity at
FERC regulated rates and conditionns for 18-36 months. They claim these are
like the UK and Australian "vesting contracts", but these involved
significant capacity or options payments as well. CPUC request that all
generators and marketers should be instructed to begin preparation of
cost-based filings (how this would actually work is not stated).

Needless to say the implementation of any of this would be wiping out the
market for up to three years, and eliminating any potential profits from
current long positions in the market.

The schemes they have proposed have numerous problems - even if the
objectives were desirable - so there is plenty to poke holes in. The
decision on whether to file any response to me would seem to be based on
whether these issues will be completely addressed in FERC's order, making
the CPUC Motion irrelevant. If there is any chance that the CPUC could be
taken seriously their motion should be opposed, as the restrictions on the
market are quite onerous. Any players with long positions in the market
would stand to lose quite a bit under the proposed capped rates at these
levels.

Seab

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com


Hi Richard.  I was just wondering if you sent this to me because of my recent
inquiry to Joe re: personnel profiles for power marketing/trading folks for
our Australia efforts?  thanks

Richard Ingersoll@ECT
02/19/2000 08:52 PM
To: Rebecca A. McDonald@ENRON
cc: All Enron Worldwide@ENRON

Subject: Re: Paul Quilkey

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca A. McDonald @ ENRON                           02/18/2000 05:51
PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Paul Quilkey

Please join me in congratulating Paul Quilkey in his new role as Vice
President leading our efforts in Australia.  Joe Hirl has assumed a leading
role in the formation of our business in Japan.  Joe also has regional
responsibility for trading activity.

Paul's appointment is in recognition of the critical role Paul has played in
Enron Australia's successful commencement and the body of outstanding work he
has accumulated to date in his career with Enron. It is worth noting that
Paul joined Enron as recently as the Associate intake of 1995.  In the short
time since then Paul has developed and grown through various positions to his
current Trading and Origination role, a position of great responsibility in a
dynamic young business making aggressive inroads into the Australian market,
and far from Enron's traditional US markets.

Please join me in congratulating Paul on his appointment.

Rebecca


I wanted to let  you know I am currently negotiating two Master Gas
Agreements with TransCanada for the two entities listed above.  As previously
discussed, credit suggests increasing  TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.'s  guaranty
to $50MM and decreasing Enron's to the same amount.    Have you discussed
TransCanada's guaranty?    Is $50MM large enough to cover your agreement?

Veronica Espinoza(66002) in credit is working with me on guaranty issues.
Finally, did you receive copies of Enron's and TransCanads's guaranty?  If
not, let me know I will fax same.  Their guaranty expires the end of this
month.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I relpied to mom already, but thought you would want to see it.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000
11:09 AM ---------------------------

Darnellmo@aol.com on 11/15/2000 04:49:06 PM
To: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com, cgiron@mindspring.com
cc:
Subject: Re: CO

Will be sending you info about a first cousin's reunion set for next sept
near Denver.  Barry's family had already planned a family vacation there and
I think Sean and Kim convinced them that this would be a good time for all 9
of you to try to get together.
Barry already has reservations at two condos there so will xerox Erva's
letter.  I am willing to foot the bill for the condos.

MOM


Yes, does it still have your name on it??????

It looks like we are planning on getting there around 2:30 - 3:00.  Does that
fit in with your schedule?

Our cell phone number is (503) 757-7380

Rick

--- Mark.Guzman@enron.com
> wrote:
>
>sounds good.  Do you have my cell phone number?

_____________________________________________________________
http://www.osubeavers.com - The Official Athletic Site of Oregon State
Beaver Fans! Get your FREE email at --> http://mail.osubeavers.com!


Yes - it's a Puget deal. I'm trying to contact Sean right now to see if he
and Diana overlapped on these deals. I only see them written once in his
trade log, but I'm auditing the second two to find out who entered them.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:54 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

534497 is a pudget deal?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/28/2001 04:42 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

Verified with Diana and Sean - these should be APB.

and the Williams deal should be resolved - deal # is 534497

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

i have 2 more things besides the williams deal.  apb is trying to leave thats
why i was trying to get these deals resolved.

534496
534497

apb does not recognize, these may be duplicated deals that are already in the
system.

thanks


Gerald,

Please review and let's discuss.

Thanks,
Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Erazo Z., Ricardo (SIP_Stgo)" <ricardo.erazo@sipetrol.cl>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Erazo+20Z+2E+2C+20Ricardo+20+28SIP+5FStgo+29+22+20+3Cric
ardo+2Eerazo+40sipetrol+2Ecl+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:37 PM
To: Hilgert, Chris
Cc: Harambour G.,Salvador (SIP_Stgo); Harambour, Alberto (SIP_USA); Reid, Dan
(SIP_USA); Lee R., Patricio O. (Casa Matriz); Rodriguez M.,Federico
(SIP_Stgo); 'DANIELREID@AOL.COM'
Subject: Posesion/Caadon and Daniel/Skua Fields Reactivation

Dear Chris:

In order to conclude the topic related to the subject, please consider the
attached letter.

Thanks very much

Ricardo Erazo

 <<Doc2.doc>>

 - Doc2.doc


As you are aware, the Trading Floor adopted three families for the holiday
season.  Thanks to your support all three families will have a better holiday
than they would have without your help.  You have been more than generous!

We have one family (single mom with four children) who has a boy who's
birthday is tomorrow.  We would like to make sure this 12 year old boy gets a
birthday gift.  If you would like to help us with this, we are asking
everyone to pitch-in a dollar or two.  Please forward your money to Theresa
Villeggiante or Grace Rodriguez.

Thanks!

Mollie


Looks like this is back in the right spot for discussion...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 09:13 AM
---------------------------

John Sherriff
04/03/2001 08:11 AM
To: Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT
Subject: Re: FW: Changes to the executive Viewer

Thanks Wes - I will discuss with Mike and Jeff,

John

From: Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/03/2001 08:10 CST
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: FW: Changes to the executive Viewer

John,

There has been a fair amount of discussion about this as well as the
reporting of drift for the North America businesses.  Both Mike McConnell and
Jeff Shankman are opposed to moving the location of drift in the DPR.  I know
that North America included US drift in its plan and includes "drift
earnings" in its margin.  I believe you do the same in Europe.  Jeff is
adamant that we not  move US drift from EGM's section of the DPR and has
asked for UK drift to remain, as well.  You may want to call Jeff.  Sally and
I will do what ever you guys decide.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jeffrey A Shankman
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Wes Colwell
Cc: Sally Beck
Subject: FW: Changes to the executive Viewer

Please deal with this.  Wes, you know what I think and what we've decided
on.  Jeff
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hickerson, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

FYI

Gary
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001
07:21 AM ---------------------------

Michael Kass@ENRON
02/27/2001 06:07 PM
To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Thibodeaux/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

Gary

I prepare the London Summary and I have been requested by John Sherriff here
in London to have changes made to the reporting format of the Executive
Viewer report.  John's request and the changes he has asked for are detailed
below.  In essence, John would like Enron Europe's 'UK Drift' revenue to be
reported under the 'Enron Europe' heading in the Exec Viewer instead of being
reported under the 'Global Markets' heading.  If you agree to this change
could you advise Chris Abel and Johnny Thibodeux to make the appropriate
changes.  If, however,  you would like to discuss the matter further please
contact John Sherriff.

Regards

Michael
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Kass/EU/Enron on 27/02/2001 23:50
---------------------------

John Sherriff@ECT
23/02/2001 16:27
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Kass/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: JOHN PLEASE AUTHORISE Changes to the executive Viewer

Michael - Please move forward with these changes.

John

James New
23/02/2001 16:14
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: JOHN PLEASE AUTHORISE Changes to the executive Viewer

John,

The attached is the format I believe we discussed and agreed with Ted a few
days ago. In order that the guys in Houston will make the changes they
require your authorisation.

If you can authorise by return then Michael Kass and I will forward it on to
the necessary people below.

If you are not happy with the attached please let me know what needs to be
changed.

Thanks James
---------------------- Forwarded by James New/LON/ECT on 23/02/2001 16:14
---------------------------

Michael Kass@ENRON
22/02/2001 10:47
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Changes to the executive Viewer

Changes are required to the reporting format of Enron Europe's P/L in the
Executive Viewer .  Below is a list of these changes as well as the person
responsible for effecting each change:

Gary Hickerson: The UK Drift book is to be reclassified from the 'Enron
Global Markets' heading to the 'Enron Europe' heading;

Susie Ayala: The Enron Europe (Net Fair Value) Equity Investments book is to
reclassified from 'Merchant Summary' to the 'Enron Europe' heading;

Chris Abel: The following changes are to be made to the books reported under
the 'Enron Europe' heading:
 - J Block is to be reported as a separate line item;
 - Structured Derivatives UK is to include all other structured derivatives
and power/gas accruals (currently reported under 'Other' line item);
 - For each of the Electricty books, could you change the word Electricity to
Power in the headings (for consistency purposes).


Kay

Ben asked me to forward you this letter from Jeff Darst at GE.

Attached is a copy of the letter from Chris Booth dated May 3rd to which GE
is responding.

Regards,
Rebecca
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron on 05/09/2001
02:24 PM ---------------------------

jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com on 05/09/2001 01:18:59 PM
To: chris.booth@enron.com
cc: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, chasecl@pssch.ps.ge.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com,
stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, Rebecca.Walker@enron.com

Subject: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Chris,

Please see attached letter, original to follow via FedEx.

 <<Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf>>
 <<Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf>>

 - Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf
 - Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf


----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 09:02 AM -----

 - first_time_1.jpg


Start Date: 1/23/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012314.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


HPL requested tha we reduce the delivery into HPL's Carthage cartwheel
agreement to 20,000 MMBtu/d for today only.  Therefore, adjust today's nom
into
Eastrans
to 35,800 MMBtu, increasing to 40,800 tomorrow (the 2nd).

Redeliveries will be:

7,800 MMBtu/d from Fuels Cotton Vally
8,000 into PG & E
20,000 at Carthage into HPL's cartwheel

For 5/2, receipts will be 40,800 with redeliveries
as shown below.

The volume for today to be sold  by DEFS is increased
by 5,000 at Carthage to 8,720.  Tomorrow will be 3,720.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce McMills/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC on
05/01/2000
09:59 AM ---------------------------

Bruce McMills
05/01/2000 09:20 AM

To:   briley@enron.com, dfarmer@enron.com, stacey.neuweiler@enron.com
cc:   Chad W. Cass/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, William E. Speckels/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Jim
I.
      Fields/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Donna C. Spencer/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Cheryl L.
      Horning/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Michael R. Cherry/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Julia
      A. Urbanek/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Cheryl L. Horning/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC
Subject:  Nom 5/1 (revised) - Eastrans

My understanding is that we have been cut for the 1st on HPL's transportation
to 8,000 MMBtu/d.

Therefore, we are reducing our nom for 5/1 and following to 40,800 MMbtu/d.

The redeliveries are as follows:

7,800 from Fuels Cotton Valley
8,000 into PG & E
25,000 to HPL's cartwheel agreement at Carthage

For DEFS' info, we will have 3,720 MMBtu/d available
at the tailgate of Carthage for sale.


---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 04/12/2000
05:50 PM ---------------------------

John Nimmons & Associates <jna@olywa.net> on 04/12/2000 05:31:16 PM
To: drothrock@camfg.com, bgaillar@enron.com, thoatson@enron.com,
abh1@pge.com, ktt3@pge.com, pxo2@pge.com, rjl9@pge.com, tob2@pge.com,
dgeier@sdge.com, alvarezm@sce.com, jkloberdanz@sempra.com,
rhite@socalgas.com, erwong@worldnet.att.net
cc: smckinley@ingaa.org
Subject: DG Collaborative - Summary of March 17 mtg, etc.


On Friday, January 26, 2001, an earthquake rocked the western region of
India. The earthquake reportedly had a magnitude of  7.9 and was centered in
the state of Gujarat. Initial reports indicate the death toll to be at least
15,000. Most of the damage was reported in Ahmedabad, the state's commercial
center.

Enron has a significant business presence in India. It has E&P interests off
the Gujarat coast and is the majority owner of the Dabhol Power project,
ultimately a 2,184 MW (net) generating plant, serving consumers in the state
of Maharashtra, which borders Gujarat to the south. Consequently, Enron Oil
and Gas India Limited (EOGIL), Enron India and DPC have mobilized staff and
resources in India to tangibly assist the relief effort (e.g. contributing
emergency medical supplies).

Enron employees are encouraged to donate to relief efforts and to take
advantage of our Matching Gift Program to double the impact of your
donation.  Enron will match, dollar for dollar, every donation that you make,
up to $15,000 annually per employee.  Listed below are a multitude of
organizations that are offering aid to the victims of this earthquake.  To
print a Matching Gift form, please click here << File:
http://home.enron.com/cr/ >>  and then click on gifts, grants and giving.
Please fill out the form and send it with your check to 3AC-1409.  We will
send the money collected, along with a check from Enron for the same amount,
to each of the organizations.  Please make sure to write "India" in the memo
area on your check.

If you have any questions, please contact Misha Siegel via email.
Thank you, in advance, for your support!

Organizations aiding victims of the Earthquake in India:
Adventist Development and Relief Agency
American Friends Service Committee
American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee
American Jewish World Service
American Red Cross
Baptist World Aid
B'nai B'rith International
Brothers' Brother Foundation
CARE
Catholic Medical Mission Board
Catholic Relief Services
Childreach/PLAN International
Christian Reformed World Relief Committee
Church World Service
Concern America
Concern Worldwide
Direct Relief International
Doctors Without Borders
International Aid
International Relief Teams
Lutheran World Relief
MAP International
Mercy Corps International
Operation USA
Oxfam America
Presbyterian Disaster Assistance
Project Concern International
Salvation Army World Service
Save the Children
Share Foundation
United Methodist Committee on Relief
US Fund for UNICEF
World Relief, Department 3
World Vision


LAST CALL for BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS AND NEWS for this week's EnTouch Newsletter.

Please submit your news by 12 noon today.

Thanks!
Kathie Grabstald
x 3-9610


Thanks for the feedback.  I think this is right in line with CRM's proposal
and will definitely meet our objective to control credit risks with higher
risk counterparties.  It is an excellent Phase 1 solution which we certainly
can try to address more systematically in future developments.

We have done some initial review of the current deal flow in Houston and
London and don't expect this language to impact a high percentage of
transactions.   Based on our review of recently executed Enron transactions
we expect about 80% of total transactions will not be impacted by this
language.  Most of our deal flow is with highly rated counterparties.
However, as we build the Online Trading volume with more customers, we expect
the majority of our customers will require this GTC language.

Bill

Justin Boyd
07/21/99 12:56 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/LON/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT,
andrew.wilkinson@cliffordchance.com, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Proposed revised collateral clause for Online GTCs

Following my earlier conversation with Mark Taylor I have revised the text,
as attached.  This limits the form of collateral to letters of credit.

Comments/questions.........

Thanks

Justin


Return-path: <Awenda2000@cs.com>
From: Awenda2000@cs.com
Full-name: Awenda2000
Message-ID: <75.d062b85.275d329b@cs.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:47:07 EST
Subject: our conversation today
To: wkamins@enron.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_3b.d386bc9.275d329b_boundary"
X-Mailer: Unknown sub 111

Hi Wincenty,
It was a pleasure talking to you today. I am enclosing my resume and look
forward to talking to you again.
Best regards
Bibianna

 - BIBIANNA  res.#2.doc


Louise,

Attached as we discussed is a draft of the wording that could be used
in the master purchase agreements to designate a third party to take
title in the event of physical settlement.  We would be happy to
discuss this wording on tomorrow morning's call.

Regards,
Lou Eber
212-821-3578

-----Original Message-----
From: Stock, Chase+
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 6:44 PM
To: Eber, Louis; Hunt, Jim+; Meisner, Joseph+; Schleimer, Andrew+;
louise; wisemanm; gilbergd; davye
Cc: Stock, Chase+; Stock, Chase+
Subject: 9:00 AM EST Call on 1/4/02

The information for the 9:00 AM EST call on 1/4/02 is

1-888-446-5348
Ask for UBS Warburg call
Moderator: Joseph Meisner.

If you have any problems, please call me.

Chase Stock
Mergers & Acquisitions
UBS Warburg LLC
Tel 212 821-3977
Fax 212 821-4178

 - netco-phys.doc

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


At the request of several attorneys, we have purchase 3 copies of the Bankruptcy Code.  One is with Dot, one is with Colleen and the third will be kept with Janet and I so we can check it out and know where it goes [:o)].

Thanks,

Iris S. Waser
Enron Transportation Services Company
1400 Smith Street, EB 4749b
Houston, TX  77002
713-853-6059
713-853-5425 - fax
iris.waser@enron.com


Cheryl,

I have a few updates/comments.

1) Under "Trading Controls and Procedures", 5th bullet - "Daily Positions and P&L Reports are approved and signed off by trading" - when would this occur, at night or in the morning? and by whom - the head trader?
2) Same as above, 6th bullet - Traders will not check third party confirms for accuracy before Trader approval is input into the system.  Traders only run the deal checkout report to see that the trade is entered into the system as transacted and then mark the trade with a "C" so that Accounting knows that the deal is OK and then Accounting can print a confirm from the system to send out.
3) Under "Risk Assessment and Control (ETS RAC), 6th Bullet, yes the bullet is appropriate.  RAC must monitor the last 5 days P&L for limits.
4) Same as above, 7th bullet - whether in a spreadsheet or in the system, RAC must monitor these limits.
5) Under "Accounting Settlement and Financial", 7th bullet - "Trades designated as hedges are to be segregated into unique portfolios."  Deals that are hedges and deals that are not hedges may be in the same book.  They can be segregated for reporting purposes so rather than say they are segregated into separate portfolios,  recommend we just simply state that they can be reported separately.
6) Same as above, 9th bullet - "Financial/Gas Accounting will get/identify the third party off-setting position(s) from the Enron affiliate and forward deal sheets to the traders to enter the deal(s) into the System as an off-setting position in a separate book to judge the effectiveness of the hedge(s) on a consolidated Enron basis."  This was discussed as a potential option to ease the administrative burden on Accounting.   A final decision has not yet been reached.  There are potential system-wide impacts that need to be assessed and resolved before we go forward with this process.  Rather than spelling out the exact terms here on the "how", I recommend that we just say that third party effectiveness will be assessed by Accounting on a consolidated Enron basis.
7) Under "Change Controls", "Price/Volatility Curves"  I recommend this reads as follows:   "NNG & TW have entered into confidentiality agreements with a third party provider of Forward Curve information.  This information is loaded into the system directly from its source.  In addition, this information is used to calculate correlations and historic volatilities which is separately loaded into the system.  The third party provider is independent from our activities and is routinely audited in accordance with Enron's policy."
8) Same as above, "VaR Calculations" - I recommend this reads as follows:  "The VaR calculation method used in the Zai*Net system is the commonly used Risk Metrics model for assessing VaR.  This is embedded in the code of Zai*Net and can only be changed by Caminus."
9) Appendix B - "Book Structure" - I recommend that this be described as an example and further that a desciption of each layer of the hierarchy be shown since this is an expandable book structure.  For example, if we wanted to "book" a deal to a certain profit center, it could be done for any business line.  Further, we can add new business lines.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks for your help!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Cheryl Perchal" <perchal@huntel.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cheryl+20Perchal+22+20+3Cperchal+40huntel+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:47 PM
To:	Peters, Jerry; Fancler, Dan; Ferrell, Lee; Hayslett, Rod; Neubauer, Dave; Miller, Kent; jim.saunders@enron.com; Mercaldo, Vernon; vince.strohmeyer@enron.com
Cc:	Perchal, Cheryl; Jesse III, John; Hayden, Frank; Schultz, Cassandra
Subject:	ETS Risk Management Procedures and Controls

ETS needs to attach an ETS Risk Management  Procedures and Controls document with its Interim Trading Application.   With the help of Frank Hayden, of Enron RAC, the latest draft of the ETS Risk  Management Procedures and Controls has been revised.  I have attached the  revised version for your review.  I do have some questions included within  the document and would like your comments concerning those.  I would like  to get this document finalized as soon as possible so that we can submit our  interim trading application to Rick Buy by either late this week or early next  week.  I'd appreciate your comments/revisions tomorrow, if  possible.

 - ETS.procedure1-vns-pres1a.doc << File: ETS.procedure1-vns-pres1a.doc >>


>
>
>  <<Can't we just get along.jpg>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************

 - Can't we just get along.jpg


Sounds good to me.  The only days I don't want to meet are the 4th and 5th.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Christina Raymond" <crileyraymond@hotmail.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:11 AM
To:	anna.hughes@pharma.novartis.com; bhennessey@ssfrancis.org; deannaharris@houston.rr.com; rainey01@sprynet.com; White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Book Club!

All right, we have tried to almost complete a whole month without seeing
eachother.  Now that I have turned thirty, Bridget has run the marathon, and
Kelly had Luke, we no longer havea excuse not to see eachother.  O.K. Kelly,
we might make a small exception for you.  I think we should start off with a
small novella, written by Steve Martin.  Yes, Steve Martin, the comedian.
He has a short book in the stores; he has written.  It is called Shopgirl.
The reviews in Amazon are fairly good.  Does anyone else have a good
suggestion?  I think meeting in the beginning of February would be a good
idea. -Christina
P.S. We miised you, Kelly and Anna at my fine party(oh yeah it was for Kelly
Kampe too!).  Ya'll will just have to hear all about it.

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


Dear traders,

Just a reminder that we will be having our weekly EnPower Cleanup meeting this Wednesday April 4, 2001.
It should take no longer than 15 minutes.

Please contact me with any questions you may have in the mean time.

Virginia


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Hendon [mailto:hendob@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:02 AM
To: Whitt, Mark; paul.lucci@enron.com
Subject: Fwd: You'll love this!

Make sure your sound is on for this...

>
>You have to see this...It's hilarious. It's posted on the 1400smith website
>as well!
>
>http://www.oddtodd.com/
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
FAWCETT, JEFFERY C              JESS K HYATT                    Nov 01, 2000
LINDBERG, LORRAINE              JESS K HYATT                    Oct 31, 2000
LOHMAN, THERESE K               JESS K HYATT                    Oct 30, 2000
MATTHEWS, RONALD L              TERRY D GALASSINI               Oct 31, 2000
MERCALDO, VERNON M              LEE C FERRELL                   Oct 26, 2000
STOKES, CHRISTINE A             JESS K HYATT                    Nov 01, 2000


Yes, I've received messages but have not heard from the right person.
However, I want to clean up the transaction itself.  Why is it a swaption?
ss


I have adjusted deal #152638 to cover the first 20 days of flow in Jan.

D

Jackie Young
05/30/2000 12:38 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Hello Again,

Have you anything about 98-6725 for 1/2000 production for the 1st 20 days of
the month yet?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 12:37
PM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong
	05/30/2000 11:01 AM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Just want to check on this again.   please let me know if you hear anything.
Thanks.

Jackie Young
05/26/2000 03:02 PM
To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Anita,

I spoke w/Daren and he apprised that he e-mailed Craig and that Craig has to
re-negotiate the deal and Daren will respond to me on Tuesday next week.

-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 03:01
PM ---------------------------

Jackie Young
05/26/2000 08:45 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Hey Daren,

We're back on this issue again.  There is gas out there for days 1-3 and 6-20
but the deal is only good for 21-31.

Can you assist Anita and I w/a deal number to place the 1st 20 days on.
Anita is attempting to close this issue.

As usual, thanks for your help.

-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 08:42
AM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong
	05/26/2000 08:41 AM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 08:40
AM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong
	04/10/2000 02:13 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Jackie,
We are back on this issue again...........the deal was only good for day
21-31, don't we have to find out who this gas belong's to for days 1-20?
Stephanie still thinks this should be for Encina.   Please advice.

Thanks

Jackie Young
04/03/2000 05:19 PM
To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

I've just reallocated the meter.........................give a minute
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 05:18
PM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
04/03/2000 05:14 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

yes

Jackie Young
04/03/2000 05:10 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Daren,

The above mentioned meter is on stranger's for the entire month of Jan.
2000.  There is a deal ticket applicable to this meter from Jan. 21st thru
the 31st.  Is it o.k. for Volume Management to apply volumes from the 21st
thru the 31st to the 215?

I don't know what kind of issues was associated with this deal.

Thanks
-Jackie-

---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 05:08
PM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong
	04/03/2000 05:00 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Jackie, any luck on the issue w/ the gas allocated to "stranger's gas" at
this meter..........

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 02:29
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           04/03/2000 10:00 AM

To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Anita, have you found out any further information about this meter.  Encina
still beleives that we owe them for this gas.

Thanks, Stephanie (3-6004)

	Anita Luong
	03/03/2000 02:11 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Jackie,
I see that the gas at this meter is allocated to "stranger's" in POPS.
Stephanie Gomes in Settlement thinks that this could be Encina's gas.  I see
in Sitara that deal 152638 is only valid from the 21st - 31st.   Can you
please take a look.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 01:36
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           03/03/2000 01:34 PM

To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Hey Anita,
For meter # 0986725, 1/00 production, I am showing per meter statement that
41,671mmbtu flowed.  Is that gas really Encina's.  Has the volume just not
been allocated yet.  Could you let me know  what the deal is on the meter.

Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )


J.C. asked me to send the following:

We are sending you by messenger today a subpoena that we received last night asking that you produce documents and appear to give testimony before the SEC. IGNORE THE DATES INDICATED IN THE SUBPOENA. We will negotiate significant and reasonable restrictions on the documents produced and different deadlines and appearance dates. These negotiations will likely result in new such dates from mid- to late-January. To the extent you have not already done so, please segregate and assemble any documents that you might have, even for the broadest request. I will be in touch with more details.

Please do not be overly alarmed. This subpoena issued to nineteen others merely indicates that the SEC believes that you have material information relative to its investigation. It does not mean that you are a target of that investigation.

J.C. Nickens

This e-mail and any attached files may be confidential and subject to attorney/client privilege. If you received it in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail or by calling (713)654-7600.


Kate, I have forward your request to Samuel Schott in Global Counterparty.
He can be reached at 713-853-9890.  If I can be of further service, please
call me. wlh


This one too please!  Normally, I can get the information I need out of
Global Counterparty, but it's not in there for these last few counterparties.
Thanks!
Kim
---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000
10:14 AM ---------------------------

Kimberly Hundl
12/11/2000 10:10 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/ENRON@enronxgate
cc:

Subject: Deal #477087.01 Pinnacle West...

Same with this one.  I need contact info to verbal.
Gracias Amiga!
Kim
---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

Kimberly Hundl
12/11/2000 10:00 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal #476578.03 Montana Power Company

Hi Kate,
I need to get a contact name and phone number for this counterparty so that I
can get a verbal confirm on this deal.  Please see if John can give you this
information.  Have a lovely day!
Thanks!
Kim


I enjoyed talking with you today. Here is the memo.  Please give me a call
after you have had a chance to review it.  <<Memo to Enron re UETA, ESIGN &
UCITA.doc>>

 - Memo to Enron re UETA, ESIGN & UCITA.doc


cross default it to the Credit Agreement

thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 6:28 PM
To: Rohauer, Tanya
Subject: NUI Energy Brokers, Inc. financial trades

Tanya:

You  were going to let me know about the cross default for the two swaps.
Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW2005  OCT 19,2001       2:00 PACIFIC      05:00 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) Canada's Northwest Territories Sponsors
New Green Energy Power Development, in an Advisory by
Industrialinfo.com

    Business/Energy Editors & Environmental Writers

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 19, 2001--The following is an
advisory by Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources,
Inc.; Houston, Texas). Canada's Northwest Territories provincial
government has been looking at the region's major river systems as a
source for green or environmentally friendly hydroelectric power.
Studies indicate that the six river systems in the province could
produce 11,630 mega-watts (MW) of power. Developing hydroelectric
power of this magnitude would require about $16.6 billion for new
generation construction alone, with several billion more needed for
power transmission line and infrastructure construction.
	   The largest river system in the province, the Mackenzie River
system, has the greatest potential for future development. It is
estimated that the river system has the capacity to support the bulk
of studied new hydroelectric generation construction at around $14
billion.
	   Utilization of green power instead of fossil fuels for new power
plants could reduce future CO2 emissions in Canada by approximately
50% and supports the provinces' push for greenhouse gas emission
reductions. In addition, communities in the region would be able to
share over $428 million of power sales related revenues annually from
power companies locating in the area. These power projects can also
stimulate industrial growth by attracting new support businesses to
the area.
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including industry alerts and databases for the energy &
industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities in the Power and Energy markets as well as
other industrial sectors send inquiries to
powergroup@industrialinfo.com or visit our Web site at
www.industrialinfo.com.

    --30--HM/ho*

    CONTACT: Industrialinfo.com, Houston
             Joseph Govreau, 713/783-5147

    KEYWORD: TEXAS INTERNATIONAL CANADA
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: ENERGY ENVIRONMENT OIL/GAS UTILITIES
    SOURCE: Industrialinfo.com

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.