----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:40 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/23/2001 06:16 PM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@mail.acom2.com> @ ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legislative Status Report Week Ending 2/23

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/23/2001 06:15 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	02/23/2001 05:59 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff"
<siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Ross Ain" <rain@caithnessenergy.com>,
"Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Randy
Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "Larrea, John" <John.g.Larrea@williams.com>, "kent
Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jack
Hawks" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Eric
Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Doug
Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean Gosselin"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Craig Chancellor" <craigc@calpine.com>, "Cody
Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Gates" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "Bob Escalante"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill
Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Joe Greco"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "Theo Pathos" <theo@ppallc.com>, "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Bev Hansen"
<bhansen@lhom.com>, "Cary Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Delany Hunter"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "DJ Smith" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>,
"Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>,
"Marie Moretti" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Maureen OHaren"
<Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Phil Isenberg"
<Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Ron Tom"
<thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Susan
McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Andy Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>,
"Chris Ellison" <CTE@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug Kerner" <runwithmee@aol.com>,
"Dave Modisette" <dmodis@ns.net>
		 Subject: Legislative Status Report Week Ending 2/23

Date: 2/23/01
To: Jan Smutny-Jones, Steven Kelly, Katie Kaplan
Cc: IEP Board of Directors
From: Julee Malinowski-Ball, Edson + Modisette
RE: Legislative Status Report Week Ending 2/23

RECENT EVENTS:

-- The week started off on a very positive note.  Monday was a holiday!
Tuesday, however, inevitably came along to spoil all the fun with last
minute committee hearing announcements for some significant bills.

-- SB 39x (Speier) was heard this week in the Senate Energy Committee.  This
measure would define owners or operators of any electric generating facility
as a public utility subject to the state,s jurisdiction.  The bill also
places the CPUC in the role of determining scheduled maintenance outages for
generation units.  Although the bill goes much further, the author,s only
intention is to give the CPUC a role in coordinating power plant outages,
but seems to not understand the implications of doing it in the manner
outlined in the bill.  IEP opposed the bill and testified to that end along
with CMTA, the State Chamber of Commerce, Enron, WSPA, and the California
Cogeneration Council.  The usual cast of consumer groups supported the bill.
Of particular note during the hearing was the hostility shown to the
opposition by the Chair of the Committee, Senator Bowen.  The message from
the opposition clearly was ignored by the majority of the members as it
passed out of the committee on a party-line vote.  IEP is currently
reassessing its strategy on this particular issue because this is not the
only bill that proposes similar changes.

-- The Assembly Natural Resources Committee, chaired by Asm. Howard Wayne,
was scheduled this week to hear two siting bills.  The first was AB 34x (La
Suer), which would make various changes to the CEC siting process, including
some IEP-sponsored language.  IEP has a support if amended position on the
bill which has some technical and policy problems, but workable.  Last
minute amendments offered by Asm. Keeley forced Asm. La Suer to postpone a
hearing on the bill until next Monday (2/26).  However, because the Keeley
amendments basically gut the current language and turn it into a study bill,
La Suer is unlikely to accept them and, according to the negative committee
analysis, the committee is unlikely to approve the measure in its current
form.

AB 36x (Wright), on the other hand, passed the Natural Resources committee
with only one &no8 vote.  AB 36x would provide expedited siting for a
repower project, as defined.  However, despite IEP,s efforts to get the bill
amended, the current language would help few, if any, repower projects.  The
author has agreed to continue working with us, the environmental community
and the CEC to develop language that works for everyone.  IEP,s major issue
at this point is that is should actually work.  The measure was double
referred to the Assembly Energy Costs and Availability Committee and will be
heard there next.

-- The negotiated language on the QF issue finally has a vehicle, SB 47x
(Battin).  All stakeholders are not united in their complete support for the
measure.  IEP has may need some additional changes but will be mobilizing
members on Monday to educate Senators on the bill and support the measure in
the Senate Energy Committee when it is scheduled for a hearing.  Both SCE
and WSPA also have some outstanding issues, but only WSPA so far will be
opposing the bill.

-- SB 6x (Burton), which would establish and state power and financing
authority, passed off the Senate Floor 24 to 14 this week and is headed to
the Assembly Energy Costs and Availability Committee next. IEP met with
Senator Burton,s staff this week to talk about amendments to SB 6x relating
to limiting the Authority,s eminent domain powers.  Staff was open to what
we had to say but we have little confidence our recommendations will move
forward with the bill.  Regardless, IEP will continue to push for amendments
on the Assembly side.

-- SB 33x (Burton), which would require the Governor,s plan to purchase the
IOU,s transmission to be approved first by the Legislature, is still
awaiting consideration on the Senate floor.

-- The Governor had another press conference today to provide a status on
the negotiations between the state and the three IOUs regarding the purchase
of the utilities, transmission system.  Reuters is saying there the Governor
has a deal with SCE to purchase its share of the power grid for $2.76
billion.  Negotiations are still going on with PG&E and SDG&E.  More
information on press conference can be found on the Governor,s web site.

--  Attached is the most recent legislative tracking report which includes
all the special session bills introduced through yesterday.  Please let me
know if you need copies of any of these bills.

UPCOMING EVENTS:

MONDAY, February 26th
Assembly Natural Resources Committee
1:45 pm, Room 447.
AB 34x (La Suer) ) makes various changes to the siting process.

Assembly Energy Costs and Availability Committee
1:30 pm, Room 4202.
AB 38x (Jackson) ) relates to loan guarantees for renewable energy joint
venture agreements.

Senate Environmental Quality Committee
1:30 pm, Room 4203.
SB 28x (Sher/Battin) ) makes various changes to the siting process.

WEDNESDAY, February 28th
Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee
1:30 pm, Room 126
AB 45x (Kelley) ) expands the MIC for certain energy production.

--end--

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - 2001 Tracking Report.doc


Hi Chris!

Thanks for the message and the great experience at Harvard last week!  Harvard's hospitality was the best!!

I'm travelling right now and only have a minute, but I've passed along your request to Louise and will follow up with her and the totality of your request on  Monday. ( I also told Louise she was a "star in absentia" at Harvard last week!!!)

Take care and we'll speak soon!

Best!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2001 01:02 PM ---------------------------

Christopher Bartlett <cbartlett@hbs.edu> on 05/03/2001 09:33:48 AM
To:	christie.patrick@enron.com
cc:

Subject:	Enron Online case

Christie:

Following up on my message of last week, I have now finished the minor
edits required to clarify the Enron Online case (correcting the stock
price, clarifying the "One to Many" versus "Many to Many" models of
trading, etc.).  The one piece that remains for me to insert is some
information that will allow the students to make some estimates about the
economic risk involved in this bold move.  I know that wholesale services
contributed about 89% of Enron's total profit in 1999, but it is unclear
what extent of this was provided by the traditional trading activities that
subsequently were enhanced by Enron Online. My suspicion is that it is the
majority of the sales volume, and perhaps the majority of profitability,
but if we could give some clue to that in the case, it would be
helpful.  This might simply be that "trading activities constituted the
majority of wholesale services profits" or "the vast majority" or "over
80%" or whatever you think would give the students some sense of
quantification.  The alternative might be to provide data that was
disguised and could be footnoted as such.  For example, we could identify
that trading contributed "over $750 million to Enron's net profits" with
that number footnoted as a disguised figure.

The other thing that would be very helpful would be again to provide some
data on the profitability of operations in 1999 versus the profitability in
2000 when Enron Online became a dominant part of its activities.  Once
again, we could include broad-level generalizations or disguised
data.  It's your choice, but it will give the students a sense of the size
of the issue facing them.

If it is helpful to talk about this in person, please feel free to call me
on 617-495-6308 today (Thursday); or tomorrow (Friday) in the afternoon at
802-457-1880.

Once again, thanks so much not only for the cooperation on the case, but
also for the terrific organization you did in getting your executive team
up here for last week's classes.  I think you probably realized that it was
a "home run" with the students, who are still talking about it.

Best wishes,
Chris


Diana
I am missing the following deal:
Enron sell to Avista daily Mid-C at $325

Sean
I am missing:
Enron buys Duke March NP-15 at 50mw at $265

Mike
I am missing:
Enron buys from Mirant Q3'01 PV 25 mw at $410.

Thanks!!


As we discussed, your interview with Tim Belden will be held at 9 a.m. in Mt. St. Helens.


Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022806.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:   0.46 / Final:   0.41)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/28/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Notes from Bryson conversation with Ken Lay:

Urged us to "stay at the table".

Says teams in Washington have all the demand curves from the utilities (from
which to calculate offering prices).

QF meeting starts at 7:00 pm tonight.
says average cost of QFs today is 15?/kwh (amounts to 30% of supply).
believes that cost can be brought down significantly if gas is purchased
forward (perhaps by state entity).

Says all utility generation (another 30%), mostly hydro and nuclear is cost
based at  4?/kwh.

If suppliers come in at 5.5? (or even 6?), there is room under the 7? new
commodity rate component to recover securitized costs (amounts to about 40%
of SCE supply).

Says good progress was made today.  Believes they may have a framework this
evening.

Believes 5.5? is causing problem; maybe room to squeeze it up (perhaps as
high as 6.0?).

Thinks governor will slightly increase rates (or pay more at government
facilities) if the parties can get 97% of the way to a solution.

Thinks it's nearly a "done deal" that DWR (state entity) will buy power.

Says securitization may be harder to get.

Bryson's questions to Ken (and Ken's to us):  Are we willing to forbear
payment of amounts owed to us and continue to sell power to the utilities
over the next several weeks.  Ken realizes that Bryson may be overstating the
progress made, and made no commitments to Bryson.

Let's discuss at 10:30 call tomorrow.


Julie,

That's definitely an option.

We can provide the room. Maybe we can cut with you a special deal for Enron
and increase the # of people attending. I am forwarding your message to
our weather desk.

Vince

Joe,

What do you think about it?

Vince

"Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com> on 02/15/2001 08:20:24 AM
Please respond to "Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com>
To: "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: weather course

Vince,
?
We just wanted to let you know that we only have 3 people signed up for the
weather derivatives course (all from Enron) so far.? We have a couple more
that have expressed strong interest, but we are awaiting their final
decision.? If no one else signs up, Chris and Les thought that you guys
could probably get through the first day pretty easily,?and thus thought it
may be an option to teach just the 2nd day material (pricing) only at Enron
(doing it at the Hyatt is an option as well but the room might be on the
large  side)?? We would obviously reimburse you for the day not taught.? We
can teach both days as well, but thought you may want to save some time.?
?
I just wanted to give you some time to think about it.? We will know  where
we stand on final numbers by next Wednesday.
?
Julie
?
?


I approve.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/20/2000 11:24 AM -----

	Elizabeth Linnell
	Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell
	09/20/2000 10:51 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Flatscreens approval

Steve - Please forward to Eileen Buerkert with your approval.

Eileen - Per our discussion, please make sure these are the black
flatscreens.

Thanks!

----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 09/20/2000 10:50 AM -----

	Eileen Buerkert
	09/08/2000 12:01 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Enron IT Purchasing@Enron, Hank Zhang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Ruff/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andy Sikes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shauncy
Mathews/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: PO Approval needed

Elizabeth,

Because of the dollar amount of this PO, I need to have an email approval
from your senior director.  Could you forward this to the appropriate party
(if it's not you) and have him/her email me back with a note saying
"approved" on it?  I will fax this immediately after I receive that.  Thank
you!!

Eileen Buerkert
IT Sourcing and Procurement
713-345-6272
----- Forwarded by Eileen Buerkert/NA/Enron on 09/08/2000 12:00 PM -----

PURCHASE ORDER FORM
	PO No. 20090208
	Master Request:

Order Date:	09/08/2000
WO #:
CO #:	0011		SAP Cost Center #:	100062
Ordered By:	Eileen Buerkert		Phone #:	713 345-6272
Vendor:	COMPAQ DIRECT		Fax #:	317-228-8780
Contact:	TAMMY RAY		Phone #:	800-535-2563
Date Required:
Payment Terms:				NET 30 DAYS
FOB Point:
Ship To:	ENRON CORP
PO # 20090208
1400 SMITH ROOM 523
HOUSTON  TX 77002
ATTN:	LYN MALINA
713 853-1840			Note:
				Please include all ship to information on any packages.
				We will not accept packages without an ENRON PO#.
Bill To:	ENRON CORP
P O BOX 3767
HOUSTON  TX 77253
ATTN:	FELICIA SALEWSKY
713 853-3895

Quantity Ordered:
	Item Number:
		Description:
			Mfgr:   	Unit    Price:
					Price:
14	104741-001	15IN TFT 5010 OPAL	COMPAQ	$922.00
					$12908.00

			Amount:		$12908.00
	Local Sales Tax Applies?      		Sales Tax (8.25%):		$1064.91
			Total:		$13972.91

Notes:	PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS PO BY SIGNING AND FAXING TO Eileen
Buerkert @ 713 646-2450

ENRON CORP	COMPAQ DIRECT

Revision History:	Eileen Buerkert	09/08/2000 12:00:29 PM


Michelle,

See below. Lets see how many we can get Louise by 12-1pm

Presto's needs to chnage to 1/3 1/3 1/3 grants rather than all next week, so hold his back.

Louise, Michelle and I just spoke and she is checking the drafts that were prepared this weekend and making some changes. You will have them in batches during course of the afternoon. Obviously these are drafts and will need to be redone before anyone can sign (and potentially changed to modify strike date language in case they elect that option). In addition, I thought we were only focusing on the first 15 names on John's spreadsheet at least for this 2 day exercise? Your list below includes a number further down. I thought we agreed we could hold off on them until next week? I don't think we will be able to get all the 46 done over next 2 days and would recommend we focus initially on top 15 or so.

Kari/Sheila, please be on point to ferry these forms back and forth today and tomorrow. We need someone to focus purely on this for the next 48 hours.

David

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, March 26, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Oxley, David
Subject:	Contracts

Please get me the following contracts so I can give them out.  Preferably on email.  Let me know of any you will not get me by 12:00.

Calger
Duran
Belden
Swerzbin
Presto
Sturm
Herndon
Davis
Wolfe
Baughman
Arora
Don Miller
Pagan
Max
Benson
Motley
Heizenrader
Clynes
Irvin
Dorland


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 07:18
AM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/20/2001 07:11:05 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)" <lee.johnson@ps.ge.com>

Subject: RE: GE Guaranty Comments

This is okay.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shoemaker, Kent (PS, SSEP)
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 7:03 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Subject: FW: GE Guaranty Comments

> ----------
> From:    Kay.Mann@enron.com[SMTP:KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM]
> Sent:    Thursday, April 19, 2001 6:01:52 PM
> To:    Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP); Shoemaker, Kent (PS, SSEP)
> Subject:    GE Guaranty Comments
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
>
>
Gee, one more item for your review.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2001 06:00
PM ---------------------------

"Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com> on 04/19/2001 05:59:10 PM

To:   "'ccampbell@kslaw.com'" <ccampbell@kslaw.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
      <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "'iparker@freshfields.com'" <iparker@freshfields.com>,
      "'lisa.obrien@freshfields.com'" <lisa.obrien@freshfields.com>

Subject:  GE Guaranty Comments

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/19/01 18:59:28
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

============================================================================
==

Kay - Carolyn asked  me to forward to you our few comments to the GE Parent
Guaranty to forward to  the appropriate person(s) at GE.  They are attached
in a pdf file. Our  comments are limited to the inclusion of a notice and
consent of the collateral  assignment of the Recipient's rights under the
Guaranty and to conform the  governing law clause to the other GE delivered
documents in this transaction.  Please feel free to call me or to have the
appropriate person at GE contact me  with any questions.

Greg

Gregory F.  Lang
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker  LLP
1055 Washington Blvd.
Stamford, CT 06901

203.961.7446 (p)
203.674.7646 (direct fax)
203.359.3031 (firm fax)
gregorylang@paulhastings.com

(See attached file: Stamford.pdf)


I met with Jeff Sprecher of the Intercontinental Exchange for almost an hour
and a half and thought it would be a good idea to bring you up to speed on
where they are heading.

1). We now have the complete API to them, but it is hooked up to their test
environment. They will be sending us a contract to sign before they connect
it to their production site. He assured me it will be the same contract that
all the founders have to sign to get access to it. Esentially, if we trade or
provide prices the API will be free; if we are voyeurs then we will have to
pay for it.

2). He stated that charging commssion is not a denfensible business model.
They will try to make their money through mid and back office services.

3). Their purchase of the IPE is directly related to implementing 2). his
vision is to use the IPE infrastrucutre to make all derivative trades cleared
and then use the FCM's to fulfill the back office movemment of funds tasks.
In a nutshell he beleives the FCM's are all interconnected and used to moving
money around for settlements and margins through the clearinghouse, so why
not expand their role.

4). When I expressed some skepticism about 3). he asked if we would like to
participate in a forum with other ICE members to discuss shared mid and back
ofice services. I told him we would.

If anyone has any questions about this let me know.

AZ


These were the next to last drafts (before correcting any typos).


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000
03:55 PM ---------------------------

Robert Superty
01/06/2000 08:20 AM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Columbia Energy History Data

FYI - we will probably be asked what historical information is needed in our
shop from a Logistics perspective. I would suggest asking the new CES
employees to give us a list of what they know we would probably need to deal
with historical questions on pipeline and customer physical imbalances as
well as any other information that helps support some of the large customer
and asset transactions.

Have each of them put together a list that we can consolidate and forward to
the IT folks.

Thanks - Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000
07:56 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Inja Chun                           01/05/2000 01:21 PM

To: Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Dayao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lawrence R
Daze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, jpeople@columbiaenergy.com,
Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth S Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Columbia Energy History Data

The following summarizes the decisions made during our  user & IT joint
meeting today regarding the handling of CES historical data.

A.  Bryce Baxter will coordinate with all user groups to identify CES reports
that need to be actually printed as hard copy or transfered to files that
will be accessed               via the Electronic Document Management system.
B.  Jeff Peoples will be working with Bryce Baxter to produce reports using
CES system via ISDN line at Enron building - this will continue to be part of
his duty until  the job is done (Jeff joined ENA as a member of Sitara group).
C.  Larry Daze will be working with Jeff Peoples and Bryce Baxter to ensure
all reports are loaded on our EDMS with proper indexing.
D.  No need for manupulating CES history data is necessary  (i.e. downloading
on spreadsheets).  Therefore, no data will be kept on the disk other than
EDMS.


Enron AVAYA (formally Lucent Technologies) PBX & VoiceMail Outage for Enron
Center South Conversion

Due to the outstanding efforts of our ENRON and AVAYA teams, we were able to
complete both Phase I and Phase II of the project this past weekend.  There
will be NO PHASE II TELEPHONE OUTAGE scheduled for this weekend.

Thank you for your cooperation.

==========================================================

Systems:
Enron Downtown Houston AVAYA Telephone & VoiceMail Systems

Affected Users:
All Enron Houston Downtown Telephone and VoiceMail Users

System Outage Duration: PHASE II
Enron Building, 500/600 Jefferson and Pennzoil April 6, 2001, 10:00PM - April
7, 2001, 4:00AM

Summary:

PHASE II  April 6, 2001

Enron Building, 500 Jefferson, 600 Jefferson and Pennzoil Enron telephone
systems, including ALL voicemail users, will be totally out of service
beginning Friday evening, April 6th.  The outage will begin at 10:00 PM on
Friday evening. The systems will be out of service until approximately 4:00
AM, Saturday morning, April 7th.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001
09:33 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
02/06/2001 06:52 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: QK1706.1

Hi guys,

Just wanted to let you know that this deal needs to be flipped to the
FT-US/CAND-ERMS book right away as all Dynegy Canada deals
need to settle with ECC, not ENA.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this.

Thanks
Stacey


[INFO] -- Content Manager:
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message
is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer
to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

Thanks for having these signed  and sending back copies by courier, as well
as signature pages by  fax.
?
Speak with you on  Monday.
?

Jacqueline  Didier
Legal and Compliance  Department
CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON
Phone: 212-325-4129
Fax: 212-325-8282

 - 003680684.DOC
 - Didier, Jacqueline.vcf


NYMEX Membership Services
March 14, 2001
Notice # MS-18

SWITCH OF LESSOR

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 14, 2001,
the following member(s) will switch their lessor within the Exchange:

John D. Leahy (LAHY-4596)

 Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

 Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department (212) 299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(MS-18)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Please see the attached for various suggestions - action items (in red)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 12:18 PM
To:	Zisman, Stuart; McMichael Jr., Ed
Cc:	Redmond, Brian; Parks, Joe; Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	RE: Bridgeline Meeting and the First of my 10 daily emails

I visited with John Higgins, Bridgeline's attorney and discussed the warehouseman's lien.  I pointed out the Section 542 of the bankruptcy code requires them to turn over property of the estate and our position is they don't have a valid lien.  I also indicated they were opening themselves up to damages for violation of the bankrupcty stay.  John indicated that since this issue (whether Article 7 of the UCC applies to natural gas storage)  would be a case of first impression they would be willing to litigate considering the amounts involved.  Summary - They are not willing to release the gas.  They are willing to release gas in excess of the amounts we owe to them, but only if stipulated that they are not waving their rights to assert the warehouseman's lien .  At this point it is probably better to get some gas and then decide whether to litigate the remainder.  Thoughts?  [Zisman, Stuart]  This sounds like the right way to go.  Joe Parks should visit with the appropriate person at Bridgeline to figure out how much gas they are willing to release and try to get it sold.  Stuart,  the answers to your questions are inserted below.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 11:02 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Cc:	Redmond, Brian; Parks, Joe
Subject:	Bridgeline Meeting and the First of my 10 daily emails

I think we need to crystallize, in very short order, what the approval process  [Zisman, Stuart]  Gerald when you are able to figure out what must be done please advise. will be for the sale of the Pad Gas in Storage Caverns #13/#14 to Bridgeline.  I will send you via fax the proposed deal sheet.

Several interesting points from the meeting:

1)  Bridgeline is of the view that 3/12/2002 (we thought it was 4/402) is the last day on which they are obligated to reimburse Enron for the Dow Lease - Any thoughts?  Who is right?; The contract states that they are obligated to reimburse through the earlier of July 1, 2002 or 114 days following the 4 BCF Date.  The 4 BCF date is defined at the day of the last Enron Pad Gas Payment.  The last Pad Gas Payment (for the month of November) was due on 12/10/01.  Thus, the 114 days should run from 12/10/01, which puts right around 4/4/02.  [Zisman, Stuart]   The Bridgeline folks said something about an August date and then adding 110 days to that and then adding 114 days to that.  Does that make any sense to you?

2)  Their plan (assuming our deal goes through) is to amend and assume the existing lease - and get Dow to expressly release LRCI from any and all claims/liabilities/etc. following Bridgeline's assumption of the amended lease; This approach sounds reasonable.

3)  Bridgeline indicated that Dow is of the opinion that approximately $167k is owed by Enron for dewatering brine removal fees ($0.20 per ton of salt removed) - I need your help to determine whether this is accurate; I don't see any basis for this in the agreement.  The $0.20 per ton of salt removed fee, refers to barrels of capacity being created in the Cavern #1.  This is related to the leaching operation.  If the fee is related to the leaching operation, then they might be correct. (Accounting would need to verify their numbers though).  If they are seeking a fee for brine removal during degassing, I don't think they have a basis for this fee.  We need to understand their basis for the claim.   [Zisman, Stuart]  Brian would you please call Gary to find out what this is all about?

4)  Bridgeline is desirous of having Cavern #1 (along with the various rights-of-way) conveyed sooner rather than later (and wondered whether we could expedite the approval process on this part of the deal).  I don't know what the advantages/disadvantages there are to this but would love your input along with your thoughts on whether this is feasible or not; We have until July 1, 2002 to convey the Cavern #1.  To the extent we wanted to wait to wrap up all our issues and convey at that time, we are not harmed under the Partnership agreement.  Obviously we retain any risks associated with ownership of the cavern.  [Zisman, Stuart]    Is there any downside to doing it early?  Might we lose negotiating leverage?  If not, we should consider trying to do this as a good faith gesture.

5)  We indicated that we thought the approval process would take approximately 30 days from the day that we reached what we believed were mutually agreeable terms with Bridgeline (does this sound right?) - The goal is to be done no later than March 1, 2002; and I think this sounds reasonable.

6)  Eric Booth is going to call Robert Morgan to get the support for the $550k of expenses relating to the dewatering line and the flowline.

Stuart


Ami,

Please add Rhonda Robinson and Howard Camp to the list.  The items I would
like addressed are as follows:

VM - Allocations:
1.  List of meters and allocation structures - callouts, swings, etc.
2.  Listing of external meter contacts
3. Copies of expense contracts
4.  Overview of the transactions - this may not be accomodatable in this
meeting, but an overview of some of the transactions, i.e. from deal to
settlements
5.  Ensure all expense contracts are set up
6.  Discussion of any impact to any of the major industrial customers, i.e.
Entex, Equistar, HL&P

VM- Transport
1.  Imbalances
2.  # of shippers, contracts, invoices
3.  Any special transactions that need to be handled via the settlements
process
4.  Copies of contracts
5.  Customer contact listing for each account

I realize that all of these things may not be addressed in this meeting, but
they have to be answered by someone very soon in order for VM to do our
jobs.  Hopefully, if the CES representative cannot answer the questions, he
can direct me to someone who can and QUICKLY.  Let me know if you have any
questions.  Thanks for your role in this meeting.

	From:  Ami Chokshi @ ENRON                           01/20/2000 10:06 AM

To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Chambers/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: CES Deal Summary

The meeting has been time has been changed to 11:30 am-1:00 pm. Please let me
know if you'll be able to attend and/or if there will be any others
attending, so we can have an accurate head count for lunch.

Ami
3-9272

The following meeting is to discuss the new deals that have come to the Texas
desk from CES

TOPIC:  CES Deals Summary
DATE:  Friday, January 21
TIME:   2:00 PM - 3:00 PM
LOCATION:  3749

Please e-mail me prior to Friday with any specific questions that you may
want to address.

Thank you,

Ami
3-9272


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000 08:27
AM ---------------------------

Elizabeth L Hernandez
04/28/2000 08:20 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole Cortez/DEN/ECT@Enron, Paul T
Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron
cc: Hillary Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: West Desk & Denver Desk

Effective immediately Hillary Mack will be taking over the Deal Validation
piece of the West and Denver Desk.  I would appreciate it very much if
everyone would please call Hillary at X3-3425 for all issues pertaining to
the West desk and the Denver desk.

Randy, please forward this message on to the Logistics group.

Effective May 1st I wll be doing the Deal Validation piece on the East Desk.

Thanks again!


Just forwarded to Leslie also.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sacks, Edward
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:14 PM
To: Hansen, Leslie
Subject: FW: Netting Agreement - Southern Company Services/EPMI
Importance: High

You have been volunteered.  Please see the message below.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sacks, Edward
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:54 PM
To: Sager, Elizabeth
Subject: Netting Agreement - Southern Company Services/EPMI
Importance: High

Elizabeth - Attached is a netting agreement from Southern Company Services, Inc.  Please see if one of the EPMI attys can work on this.

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Markham, Robert F. [mailto:RFMARKHA@southernco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:35 AM
To: Sacks, Edward
Cc: Moore, D. Wayne; Ciza, John J.; Caldwell, Holley S.
Subject: Netting Agreement - Enron - SOCO

As we discussed last week, attached is netting agreement for Electric Power.
In my opinion the agreement is standard in nature and as you should  agree,
in my opinion of course.  Please review and comment if you would like to
modify.

As you know,  I will  be question frequently regarding the status of this
agreement,  therefore anything I can do to help complete this agreement in a
timely manner will be appreciated.

 <<Enron SOCO Netting 110601.doc>>

Robert F. Markham
Southern Company Generation and Energy Marketing
Risk Control
205-257-5835
205-257-5858 fx
rfmarkha@southernco.com


Would you two be able to attend Shelley's staff meeting for me on Monday, February 11th?  I will be at Alliant Energy in Wisconsin with Lynn Blair and Jodie Floyd to resolve some A/R, measurement and scheduling issues.  Please take notes and pass them along to me on Tuesday.

Rick


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/26/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	2,154
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,830
Total Life to Date Transactions	383,905

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 10/26/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	1,791	53%
Enron Europe Limited	122	28%
Global Products	113	24%
Enron Metals	128	6%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	44%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	1,357,134,882
MTD	37,334,751,233
LTD	206,026,985,504
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	1,952,884,848

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	14,538,259,449

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	534
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	0
Number of Products Offered Today	1,176
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,823
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,617


Mo - please set up a call
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:16 AM -----

	Daniel Casse <dcasse@whwg.com>
	12/05/2000 05:42 PM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>
		 cc: <Rob.Bradley@enron.com>
		 Subject: white house writers group proposal

Dear Steve:

I have given some thought to the ideas you and I discussed regarding a
website to promote a light-hearted view of some of the more absurd activities
of the anti-deregulation and monopoly forces in the electricity battle.

I think my White House Writers Group colleague Michael Long would love to
take this on.  He has an eclectic background: he spent considerable time as a
stand-up comedian, then did a tour as the speechwriter for Tennessee senator
Fred Thompson.  He recently had a terrific piece in the Weekly Standard
taking the air out of Herblock, the Washington Post editorial cartoonist.

(His bio is on our website:
http://www.whwg.com/Firm/WritersBio.cfm?StaffId=19. )

Mike has excellent instincts for and knowledge of free market ideas, and has
expressed them quite effectively for a number of our clients, including
high-profile CEOs and a couple of presidential candidates.  I believe he
could very quickly get up to speed on your issues and produce the kind of
humorous stuff you have in mind.  I would work closely with him to make sure
we were getting the issues right.

I propose that we begin the effort by letting Michael "loose" on the
material.  He could get familiar with the ongoing issues in California and
elsewhere, then come up with some preliminary material, including a few
suggestions of how we should format it for a website

If you think he has the hang of it, we could have a longer discussion about
how to create a permanent website and let Michael regularly write and update
the material.

December is typically a slow month for us and it would be a good time to give
this a try.  Let me know what you think.  I?d be happy to set up a call with
the three of us.

I enjoyed finally meeting you face to face at Enron and hope we can continue
to work together.

Best,

Daniel

--
Daniel Casse
White House Writers Group
615-297-5999
615-297-5908 (fax)


Hi Cheryl,

I'm looking for the executed version of the contract with Westinghouse for
the 501D turbine, which I believe was originally headed to Panama.  ENA is
looking to use it in a project or two, and I need to give a look.  An
electronic version would be fine.

Thanks,

Kay


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:36 PM
To:	Romero, Araceli; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	Group Outing

Please forward to your master email list of all of the risk management/OA group:

We are planning a group outing for a road trip to The Coushatta Casino.  The trip will be via chartered bus(yes there is a functioning toilet on board) and beverages and snacks will be provided(alcoholic and non-alcoholic).  We are planning on leaving the Enron building at 6 p.m. on a Friday and returning before 6 a.m. on Saturday.  For those of us that run books, if we are not done running our books by 6 p.m.  we will need to come back on Sunday between 4 - 6 p.m. to sign off with the Benchmark guys.  If you do not wish to go on the trip and you are not done by 6 p.m. on Friday, simply finish your P&L and hedge strip and your lead will sign off with the Benchmark guys.  Here is the issue, we have selected two dates, please respond which date you prefer and if either date is good for you.  We have to have an accurate head count to give to the bus company.  If we guarantee a number and that number does not show, the trip is cancelled per the bus company.  If you agree to a day and we provide the final head count a week in advance, barring an emergency, it is expected that you will attend to keep the trip from being cancelled for all of your teammates.  The dates we have selected are Friday October 19th and Friday November 9th.  Please respond to AC by 5 p.m. Monday October 8th.  Thanks and we look forward to another fun outing.
PL


Attached is a summary of the PJM RTO order.  While it is somewhat lengthy,
the order has a lot of good information in it that I wanted to share with the
group, particularly the Commission's statements regarding the existing
configuration of the northeast and the need to expand it.

We are working on summaries of the New York and New England RTO orders and
will have those out shortly.  If you would like copies of the orders, just
let us know.

We expect the mediation proceeding to begin within the next week.  We will
keep you updated.

Sarah


Jeanie,

I know I am probably becoming a pain in the butt about this ESOP clerical error issue but I would like to get this wrapped up before we go to UBS.  I do not believe that I will get any attention after I am no longer an Enron employee.  Should I contact Robert Jones directly?

Tom


Bob,

My one pass number is YY109954.  Thanks for the tip!

Fletch


4.43 by 4.44


leslie

can you call brent for me - I'm leaving for dc in a few minutes thanks

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hendry, Brent
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:54 AM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	Williams

Williams Energy has commented on the form of EOL amendment and there are two issues I need to get your opinion on before responding.  Can you let me know when you have a few minutes to discuss it?

Thanks,
Brent


561213

broker has the term the 28-31

thanks


Ravi is a ________.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tawney, Mark
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	FW: 'Business as usual' for weather derivatives  - Financial Times; Nov 15, 2001

FYI.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Berryman, Kyle
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Tawney, Mark
Subject:	'Business as usual' for weather derivatives  - Financial Times; Nov 15, 2001

GLOBAL INVESTING: 'Business as usual' for weather derivatives
Financial Times; Nov 15, 2001
By ALISON BEARD

When Enron, the energy trading company, became mired in controversy late last month, weather derivatives buyers were in danger of losing one of their top three market makers. But trading has not skipped a beat, according to industry sources.
"So far it's been business as usual," said Tom Stus, a trader at Axia Energy, which also sells risk protection to companies that depend on the weather, such as amusement park operators and ski resort owners.
"At one time Enron was a pretty significant player, but since they've been involved with these problems, they've probably slipped to the top 10 in terms of volume.
"We haven't seen them much in the over-the-counter market," he added. "But they're still online."
Dynegy, the company that plans to acquire Enron, also trades weather derivatives, as do a host of other commodity firms, insurers and some brokerages. Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street bank, and XL Capital, the Bermuda-based insurer, for example, recently entered the market, picking up Enron's slack, Mr Stus said.
"There's been no effect whatsoever," said Ravi Nathan, general manager at Aquila, another energy trader. "This market has a lot of capacity available."
Copyright: The Financial Times Limited 1995-1998

Kyle R. Berryman
Weather Risk Management
Enron Global Markets

Houston Tel 713-853-1704
Houston Fax 713-646-3220


GT,  Hey Bud,  Yea that Holiday Bowl was heartbreaking.  Never seen three TD
passes dropped.

Unfortunately, I don't have Ernie's number.  He called me one time at about
11 pm on a Saturday from someone's cell phone he had borrowed and left no
number.  Typical Ernie.

How are the wedding plans going?

	"Townsend, George" <gtownsend@manorisd.net>
	01/08/2001 12:50 PM

		 To: "'gerald nemec'" <gnemec@ect.enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

G,

How's it going?  The horns had a decent season I guess.

Hey, do you know how I can get a hold of Ernie?

Let me know.

GT


FYI - this is the briefing that has now been shared with the team.  In accordance with HR advice, they are also aware that the likely reduction is also in the order of 50 per cent.  Note the time line, clearly we need to close down the remaining uncertainties in the near future.

Greg should also be sending you the budget numbers which I'm due to discuss with Michael on Thursday evening.  I'm also available for the meeting Maureen is arranging with Kean, Brown, Sherriff and us for Friday.

Regards,

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kingsley, Sophie
Sent:	07 October 2001 16:19
To:	Gold, Joe; Lynch, Drew; Shaw, Eric; Dawson, Paul; Lewis, Richard; Baumerich, Gregor; Mead, Paul
Cc:	Jones, Rachel A (HR)
Subject:	BU Briefing For Monday's Announcement

All,

I have meetings scheduled with most of you for Monday, and for those of you I don't I would really appreciate getting 1/2 hour to go through next steps with following the Voluntary Redundancy Programme. Rachel will call you.

Please find attached the following information I need to talk you through:

Bu Briefing Document. ( Clearly we need to make sure we are consistent across the Organisation )

Q&A Crib Sheet.

Draft Timeline.

Selection Criteria.  As you know it is imperative from a legal perspective that we document fully our selection criteria for both voluntary and if necessary, compulsory redundancy and our assessment of employees against those criteria . This information will be vital if we have to defend a claim on the basis of the fairness of our selection process.

Finally for those who have remote offices, we need to decide a plan of action / timelines / legal implications etc.  Please note, these documents are still subject to final approval so I will bring any amendments when I see you.

Monday is going to be hectic, so if you need me call my mobile on 07818 077104.

Regards

Sophie


Becky,

Guess this is another example of e:mail cross-fire.  This arrived at the same
time I hung up the phone from talking to you.  I imagine you've spoken to
Gerald by now.

Gerald,

I'm sure that I have failed to let you know that there is a conference call
scheduled for 4:00 today (Becky, its 4:00 Central time isn't it?).  Could you
sit in on that call with Becky?  I plan to be available, but as I will be out
next Monday, and since you have done all the legal work on these responses, I
think it would be a good idea for you to be involved if you can.

Thanks,

Steve
----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000 11:21 AM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	05/18/2000 11:19 AM

		 To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Data responses

Here are the revised responses with your suggested changes.


I've been assigned the 'Advertising' Book  - I'll talk you through it.
Basically buying and selling ad space.

Bottom line - I need a body to run the book - it's seperate from Braodband -
but some of the people are the same - Jim will run it.

What can you do for me?

Please......

B.


Done - take a look.

Gloria G Barkowsky
01/12/2000 07:05 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CNG/Sabine 12/99

Deal #99663 - Thanks - gb

Chris Germany
01/12/2000 06:58 PM
To: Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CNG/Sabine 12/99

Email works good.  Do you know which deal I should put that on?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 06:57
PM ---------------------------

Gloria G Barkowsky
01/12/2000 04:27 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CNG/Sabine 12/99

Hi!  Remember last month changing the rate in sitara so the
discounts could be taken....well, I need it done for 12/99 now.
The total volumes for CNG/Sabine for 12/99 are
7,676,198 and we should be paying $13,298.60 for at rate of .00172794.
Let me know if you need more information, or copies, or whatever.  And
does emailing this work ok, or what would work best to update this every
month?  Let me know.  Thanks, Gloria.  How are you?


I could not find anything for Georgia Pacific or somebody called WAMP. There was also an SPPC which I really think is SPP(in Enpower) which is Sierra Pacific Power Company.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 10:43 AM
To:	Luong, Steven
Cc:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	RE: Customer List

What is the exact name for Georgia Pacific?  We do not see any transactions with them in the system.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luong, Steven
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:08 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Customer List

 << File: customers served 1-9-02.xls >>
Don asked me to send you this file.


I know that you left a message with Patti about contacting David Eastlake.  I
have sent e:mail messages to him that must have been delivered, as I did not
get a message about undeliverable e:mail.  I haven't heard back from him.
The phone numbers on the contact sheet are the students' numbers at school.
I have left a voice mail both for Daniel Jenkins and David during the week
between Christmas and New Year's, knowing that it was unlikely that they
would be in Austin.  (It would be great to have their home numbers as better
contact numbers during school breaks.)  I was on vacation the week before
Christmas and for two days last week.  And I admit that I did not contact any
students while I was on vacation!  I will try their Austin numbers this week
again.  Although classes don't start until next week, they may come back to
Austin early.

Similar situation with my OU students.  I have conversed by e:mail since I
did not have home numbers.  Do you know when classes resume at OU?  I will
try my students there this week again by phone in case they are returning to
school early.

I had lunch with Ted Jacobs the week between Christmas and New Years - it was
a thank you for finding some Orange Bowl tickets that David and I purchased.
(Yes, we were at the game and saw OU win the national championship!)  I have
an update from him on our list of OU candidates, according to his
understanding of some of the decisions they have made.  If you have a few
minutes today, give me a call and I can go over that with you.

Since full-time offers were changed, did we appropriately change summer
intern offers as well?  I didn't see anything in your e:mails about that.
Let me know.  --Sally


Please see attached file for key contacts during weeks of December 18,
December 25, & January 1.


Sylvia,

 This version is ready for you customer to execute.  Please have them print two originals, sign and return both to my attention.  Also,  the gty from NG to ENA should be signed.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pollan, Sylvia S.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:36 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: NG Energy Trading

Debra,

Will you change this back to $10,000,000 on Parental Garantee
In other words back to the original except we want the term to stay the same.

Thanks,

Sylvia

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Pollan, Sylvia S.; Vanek, Darren
Subject:	NG Energy Trading

  << File: NG Energy.doc >>

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Please see below, Global Contracts has approved copying the profile for the
new product type.
THX:
Kelly@5-8491
---------------------- Forwarded by Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001
04:55 PM ---------------------------

Anthony Campos@ECT
03/20/2001 04:32 PM
To: Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Georgi Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: New Product Type: US Crude Fin Opt Call and Put

Approved.

Thank You,
Anthony

	From:  Kelly Lombardi @ ENRON                           03/20/2001 04:21 PM

To: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgi Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: New Product Type: US Crude Fin Opt Call and Put

Please approve the new product codes below.  Reply by e-mail - deadline is 9
a.m. on Wednesday, March 21st.
THX:
Kelly
---------------------- Forwarded by Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001
04:25 PM ---------------------------
From: Lisa Lees@ECT on 03/20/2001 04:15 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT
cc:

Subject: New Product Type: US Crude Fin Opt Call and Put

The product type long descriptions below will fall under the new product
types US Crude Fin Option Call and US Crude Fin Option Put .  Credit (Tom
Moran) has approved copying the profiles for the new product types from the
following:

 US Crude WTI Fin Swap

Please respond by 10 a.m. on Wednesday, March 21.

Thank you.  Lisa
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 03:05 PM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  03/15/2001 02:04 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT,
Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT, Shifali Sharma/NA/Enron, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT,
Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron,
Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron, Pavel Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara
Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Approval needed for US Crude Fin Opt Call and Put

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail). If you have any questions please call me at ext.
58986.

Trader: Pavel Zadorozhny

EXAMPLES:
US Crude Fin Opt NYMEX-WTI EC___  May01  USD/bl/m

A financial Option Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which
the Seller receives the Premium and the Buyer receives the Cash Settlement
Amount. Each calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period, provided that if the Term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction.  The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be
calculated from the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website in
accordance with the unit of measure.  The Premium shall equal the product of
(i) the price submitted by Counterparty via the Website, multiplied by (ii)
the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (iii) the
number of Determination Periods during the Term of the Transaction. The
Payment Date for the Premium shall be 2 business days after the Trade Date of
the Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
5 business days after the Cash Settlement Amount is determinable. The Cash
Settlement Amount shall be the greater of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of
(a) the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the
Index minus the Strike Price.The Option style and type shall be a European
Call ("EC").  Automatic Exercise is Applicable.  The Strike Price for the
Transaction shall be as set forth on the Website.

The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 May 2001
to the Termination Date of 31 May 2001.

The Exercise Period(s) shall be the expiration day of the NYMEX Light, Sweet,
Crude Oil Options Contract for the applicable Determination Period. The Index
for each Exercise Period shall be the settlement price of the NYMEX Light,
Sweet, Crude Oil Futures Contract for the applicable Determination Period on
the expiration day of the NYMEX Light, Sweet, Crude Oil Options Contract for
the applicable Determination Period.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be Barrels per
month.

Put
A financial Option Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which
the Seller receives the Premium and the Buyer receives the Cash Settlement
Amount. Each calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period, provided that if the Term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction.  The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be
calculated from the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website in
accordance with the unit of measure.  The Premium shall equal the product of
(i) the price submitted by Counterparty via the Website, multiplied by (ii)
the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (iii) the
number of Determination Periods during the Term of the Transaction. The
Payment Date for the Premium shall be 2 business days after the Trade Date of
the Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
5 business days after the Cash Settlement Amount is determinable. The Cash
Settlement Amount shall be the greater of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of
(a) the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the
Strike Price minus the Index.  The Option style and type shall be a European
Put ("EP").  Automatic Exercise is Applicable.  The Strike Price for the
Transaction shall be as set forth on the Website.

The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 May 2001
to the Termination Date of 31 May 2001.

The Exercise Period(s) shall be the expiration day of the NYMEX Light, Sweet,
Crude Oil Options Contract for the applicable Determination Period. The Index
for each Exercise Period shall be the settlement price of the NYMEX Light,
Sweet, Crude Oil Futures Contract for the applicable Determination Period on
the expiration day of the NYMEX Light, Sweet, Crude Oil Options Contract for
the applicable Determination Period.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be Barrels per
month.
==============================================================================
=====

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


please check schedule and get back to Irwin's office.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/17/2000 10:44 PM -----

	Stelzer@aol.com
	10/06/2000 10:33 AM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc: klay@enron.com
		 Subject: Advisory group

I believe that you agreed at our last meeting that it might be well for you
and me -- and Ken if available -- to discuss plans for this group in 2001. My
feeling is that we should review its composition after the election -- we may
lose Larry or want to add a Democrat (Laura Tyson?); we can take a hard look
at who is contributing and who isn't etc.
My agenda would be:
1. What can be done to increase the value to Enron? As I see it we have two
purposes: to create fans of and spokepersons for the company in important
fora, and to enrich management's understanding of the outside world (what it
is like, and how it views some of the problems that Enron faces).
2. What are the likely topics that it would be valuable for Enron to discuss
in 2001, as best we can judge things at this early point in time?
3. What should the composition of the group consist of in 2001, given
whatever we decide in #1 and #2 above.
4. How can we maximize the chance of achieving Ken's objective of attracting
outside guest speakers? Advance scheduling? Fees? And what sorts would we
like to attract?
I am sure there are many other items; these are designed merely to start you
thinking.
Let me start the bidding by suggesting November 29 or December 4, inn
Washington if you happen to be in town, in Houston if that is more convenient.


How was the trip?  NY was great, but I got back so late, you wouldn't
believe, I missed my flight to Jackson.  I was pissed.


Please approve the attached expense report and forward it to accounting with
a cc: to me.  Sorry for the low amount ($37.83), but all expense reports need
to be in by the 13th of this month and this is all she has right now.  Thanks!


I just wanted to take a moment to personally invite each of you to participate in the e-Speak session this Thursday, May 10 at 10:00 am (CDT).  If you have questions that you'd like to submit in advance, you can do so by visiting e-Speak on the Enron homepage.

I also wanted to take this opportunity to provide you with an update on what's happening within the Program.  Since assuming my new role at the beginning of April, I've been focusing my efforts on meeting with Enron's business unit leaders, and with as many Analysts and Associates as possible.  These activities underscore my priorities in managing the Program - a very strong alignment with Enron's businesses, and frequent / informal communication.

Some of the specific items that we're focused on as a result of your feedback, and that will be communicated in coming weeks include:
improvements to the PRC process which are in the final stages of development with the business units,
recruiting goals and strategies for the 2001 recruiting season,
a series of floor meetings beginning today to visit informally with participants in the Program,
an updated social schedule that places a priority on interaction among Analysts and Associates, as well as with the business leaders of Enron.

I'm excited that Traci Warner and Ted Bland have joined our team in the Western Hemisphere to lead Recruiting and Career Development respectively.  Together, they bring almost 20 years of Enron business unit experience, and in the case of Traci - experience as an Associate in the Program.  Anna Jansson continues to do an outstanding job leading the Eastern Hemisphere Program, and has been an great source of new ideas.

When I joined Enron in 1992, there were about 25 Analysts and Associates combined, sitting in one group on the 30th floor.  Today, we have over 700 future Innovators and Leaders of Enron in offices around the world.  This Program has been, and will continue to be our most important source of new talent.  I'm very proud to have been asked to take this role, and I look forward to working with each of you.

Billy Lemmons


All,

Please mark you calendars, you  have been selected to participate in the  ENA Trading Track recruiting event Monday, October 29th , 3 pm - 7 pm.     If you are unable to interview on this date please advise.

A selection of you will telephone screen 18 external candidates, and decide whether or not they should proceed to the final round on the above date.    A separate e:mail will be sent in relation to this.

Any questions let me know.

Regards,

Karen
x54667


A quick reminder for the newer members of the group.  The bottom of the El Paso model is divided into five different regions.  Prescheduled sales, real time sales, then prescheduled purchases, real time purchases and finally ancillary services.  Each group of purchases, sales and ancillary services need to be seperate.  The purchases and sales should each pull in to the summary portion at the bottom of the model.  Likewise the ancillary services should pull into the blue ancillary service summary section.  Kathy at El Paso and/or those on shift the next day are having to correct mistakes with these formulas.  As always, if you have questions regarding the El Paso model, please ask a more experienced member of the group or myself.  Otherwise, mistakes on simple formulas should be expected not to happen.

Thanks,
Bill


---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Cutaia/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000
09:44 AM ---------------------------

veronica.gonzalez@pahou.panmail.com on 11/17/2000 01:39:51 PM
To: ANGIE.COLLINS@pahou.panmail.com, DIANE.FULLEN@pahou.panmail.com,
hugo.barron@pahou.panmail.com, jennifer.cutaia@enron.com,
LAURA.WESTBROOK@pahou.panmail.com
cc: LORAINE.HARWELL@pahou.panmail.com, MARY.DIAZ@pahou.panmail.com,
MAYRA.MALDONADO@pahou.panmail.com, micheal.sweeny@pahou.panmail.com,
phillip.alvardo@pahou.panmail.com

Subject: FW: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From:   lhahn@staffingprofessionals.net [SMTP:lhahn@staffingprofessionals.net]
Sent:   Friday, November 17, 2000 1:31 PM
To:   kcooper@staffingprofessionals.net
Cc:   connied@staffingprofessionals.net; laceyrcp@staffingprofessionals.net;
anthony@bures.com; DELacey@TLNA.COM; veronica gonzalez; DEBryant@TLNA.COM;
CSheffield@deepwater.com; OL991420@MSXSCC.SHELL.COM; tiffany odom
Subject:   FW: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE  READ!!!!

Linda Hahn
Staffing Professionals
8866 Gulf Freeway
Houston,Texas 77017
713-943-2727
713 -943-9880 fax
713-238-0447 pager

-----Original Message-----
From: Angela Denise McMillen [mailto:stdadm11@shsu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 7:40 PM
To: Lynda Merchant; Shane Buckalew; RoseAnna McMillen; Phillip Mayfield;
Paula McGann; Mom and Dad; Marilyn Dougharty; Marie McMillen; Lisa Odom;
Julie Rawlinson; Jessica Clover; grandpa and grandma; Emily McDowell; DEBBIE
GARZA
Subject: Fw: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!

----- Original Message -----
From: Joseph Graham <jgraham@peoplepc.com>
To: <CJReed@aol.com>; DAVE ZENAIDA BOLES <dzboles11@aol.com>;
<RCL1962@aol.com>; <StagesRus@aol.com>; Nick Weber <njweber@home.com>; JON
GRAHAM <jgraham113@hotmail.com>; Harold Cosse <hcosse@jps.net>; Gallery
Photography <gallery@mhiconn.net>; Mike Harvey <mlharvey@micron.net>; JEFF
A. GRAHAM <jefnmgrt@msn.com>; DENNIS KIRK <foneman@peoplepc.com>; Dairy
<dairy@pintailpoint.com>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 9:08 PM
Subject: Fw: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nolf, Bessie" <Bessie.Nolf@national-city.com>
To: <JGRAHAM@peoplepc.com>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 9:52 AM
Subject: FW: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tammy L. Reilman [mailto:kiowa@enter.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 5:05 PM
> To: ROBIN DOBOT
> Subject: Fw: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maryann Mattson" <tedmar1@earthlink.net>
> To: "Nancy James" <nancyann@emeraldcoast.com>; "Joanne &George Provan"
> <Joprovan@cs.com>; "Julie Ann Hasslinger" <jamlinger@aol.com>;
> <Rustyaog@aol.com>; "Carol Addington" <jonniead@chibardun.net>; "Jeanne &
> Dick Sawicki" <sawickis@ticon.net>; "Jo Griffith"
> <jogriffith@earthlink.net>; "Ed Belcher"
<ebelcher@mail.santarosabeach.net>;
> "Eby Lundbeck" <ELundbeck@aol.com>; "marcene johnson"
<mjohnson@faegre.com>;
> "mike hasslinger" <mhasslinger@craig-hallum.com>; "Michelle Lloyd"
> <michellelloyd17@hotmail.com>; "Ken & Judy Webb" <CKenWebb@home.com>;
"Nancy
> Anderson" <nlclay@aol.com>; "Gerald Johnson" <gdjohnson@prodigy.net>
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 4:06 PM
> Subject: Fw: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bugman" <crosby@gonelco.com>
> > To: "Angie" <abeaglemom@aol.com>; "Arine" <arine1002@aol.com>; "Chuck"
> > <cgest@aol.com>; "Claude" <Cnanon@home.com>; "Darren"
<dargil@ufsnet.com>;
> > "Donna" <dgorman@gateway.net>; "Dorothy" <scorpion110763@aol.com>; "Jim"
> > <jimmyg74@aol.com>; "Joe" <jkelly@gonelco.com>; "Joy" <jtrahan@aol.com>;
> > "Joyce" <joycew@aol.com>; "Lisa" <Bugdiver10@aol.com>; "Sylvia"
> > <sourwoodlabs@alltel.net>
> > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 6:04 PM
> > Subject: FW: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ROZICAGE5@aol.com [mailto:ROZICAGE5@aol.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 8:27 PM
> > To: DJAY@nlenx.com
> > Subject: PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSEEE READ!!!!
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> > > >  > > > From: Debbie Nelson <nelsond@netnitco.net>
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > > We have rented an email tracker for the next 3 months!
> > > >  > > > We at RH Power Inc. want to see how many people our
> > > >  > > > email can reach in this time!
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > > If you forward this mail, you will be PAID MONEY!!!!
> > > >  > > > This email must be sent immediately upon receiving this
> > > >  > > > for it to be counted.
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > > For every person you send this to you will receive I413!
> > > >  > > > For every person they send this to you will receive I139!
> > > >  > > > I too (Ryan LaGrange, Head Marketing Manager), thought
> > > >  > > > this was a hoax until I did the same this and the next month
> > > >  > > > got a check for I4612 in the mail!
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > > *************************BONUS*******************************
> > > >  > > > IF YOU SEND THIS TO AT LEAST 15 PEOPLE RIGHT
> > > >  > > > AWAY, A I25 GIFT CERTIFICATE TO OUTBACK
> > > >  > > > STEAKHOUSE WILL POP UP ON YOUR SCREEN PRINT OUT
> > > >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
>


this is another publication we are seeking to put on EnronOnline.  This party
had their own contract, so please take a look and lets discuss.  The deal is
pretty simple:  We pay 25,000 for a one year deal.  No user counts, or fees,
or attrition.  Just 25K for unlimited use.  They publish monthly but have
committed to going to twice a month.

thanks
Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 07:45
AM ---------------------------

John Sodergreen <JohnS@scudderpublishing.com> on 05/03/2000 07:58:50 PM
To: Dave.Samuels@enron.com
cc:
Subject: exchange site lic.

Hello Dave--Agreement attached (PDF file). Have a look and give a ring
tomorrow. Many thanks. Look forward to working with you.
Best,
John
 - enronexchangelic.PDF

John R Sodergreen
Editor-in-Chief
Scudder Publishing Group, LLC
johns@scudderpublishing.com
www.scudderpublishing.com
410.268.7778
The Desk, Power Executive
The Bandwidth Desk, Energy eBusiness


Rick,

Here's what I mentioned.  Thanks for the v-mail, let me know what I can do.

Regards,
Ozzie

---------------------- Forwarded by Ozzie Pagan/HOU/EES on 05/30/2001 07:18
PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Howley

05/29/2001 12:45 PM
To: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Reliant Pushes for "Negawatt" Plan

Ozzie -
Here is an article talking about Reliant's effort to do what we were
discussing last week, regarding negawatts - getting wholesalers to pay for
them like they were actual generated power instead of the absence of.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Howley/HOU/EES on 05/29/2001
12:37 PM ---------------------------

STACEY BOLTON@ENRON
05/29/2001 12:14 PM
To: Jeff A. Brown/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Heather Mitchell/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Howley/HOU/EES@EES, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Reliant Pushes for "Negawatt" Plan

This is the Reliant program I mentioned in our meeting.

----- Forwarded by Stacey Bolton/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001 12:13 PM -----

	Lynnette Barnes
	05/29/2001 11:58 AM

		 To: Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES,
Pearce W Hammond/HOU/EES@EES, Brad J Snyder/HOU/EES@EES, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey
Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Stella Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kevin
Kuykendall/Enron@EnronXGate, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky Merola/HOU/NewPower@NewPower, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, bmerola@newpower.com,
Geoff Duda/HOU/NewPower@NewPower, kathleen.magruder@newpower.com,
pbray@newpower.com, sbertin@newpower.com, scovino@newpower.com,
treichel@newpower.com, cynthia.sandherr@newpower.com, Kathleen
Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reliant Pushes for "Negawatt" Plan

FT Energy Article

By Rick Stouffer
rstouffer@ftenergy.com
The electricity supply-demand equation is simple: Match supply to demand and
things are dandy. Demand overwhelms supply: build more supply.

Throughout the country, but particularly in California, there is no question
more supply is mandated*NIMBY (not in my backyard) be hanged. But what about
the demand side of the issue? What about getting customers involved in the
solution by allowing them to sell their excess power back into the system?

'Negawatts' nothing new
Granted, the concept of negawatts is nothing new; it was coined roughly a
quarter-century ago by the founder of the Boulder-based consulting firm E
Source: Amory Lovins. Many utilities today use customer curtailment to get
them through wattage rough spots from time to time.

All the existing independent system operators have actively considered
demand-side bids at one time or another, according to Richard Rudden,
president of the consulting firm R.J. Rudden Associates in Hauppauge, N.Y.

But what about a negawatt program serving the entire Western Interconnection?
Rather than a supply exchange, aka an independent system operator, put in
place a "demand exchange" where customers could make a choice: Do I produce
widgets, run my milling machines, build product or take the power I would
have used, bid it out and see what happens?

Just such a demand exchange within the Western Interconnection is being
championed by an unlikely proponent: Reliant Energy Inc.

The Houston-based energy giant already has testified in Washington, D.C.,
concerning the proposal, has had meetings with key Western state government
leadership and pitched its idea to trade associations and environmental
groups.

The scorecard: Thus far, no one has laughed, no one has walked away from the
conversations*no one has said "no," according to Reliant's John H. Stout,
senior vice president of asset commercialization.

"You're taking forced, rotating outages and prioritizing the interruption,
with the customer (that) can take the outage doing so," said Stout.

Much of what Reliant proposes is included in Texas Republican Congressman Joe
Barton's Electricity Emergency Assistance bill, but no big generator is
pushing from the industry side like Reliant.

A demand exchange
Like generators, including Reliant, bidding load into the independent system
operator pool, a demand exchange allows retail customers to determine what
they could spare and bid in a specific load and acceptable price.

The negawatt dispatch clearinghouse would develop a bid stack and make it
available throughout the Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC). If a
particular system needed more power, it would contact the clearinghouse,
which would match the least cost set of bids that could be shipped, keeping
in mind additional transmission charges.

Once the bids were identified, the clearinghouse would contact the customer
and its local control area. The customer would interrupt and the host utility
would move the curtailed megawatts onto an export schedule.

One key to the program's success is that no one loses money. The customer
that gave up its designated electrons would continue to pay its retail
supplier for what it didn't actually use, and the customer would receive its
bid price, times the megawatts curtailed, minus its regular retail charges,
plus any payment to the transmission provider.

"The key is it gets the incentives right at the margin," said William Hogan,
a professor at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.

Another key to the Reliant-championed negawatt program is that it is not
seasonal; it doesn't lock a potential megawatt-shedder into a long-term
contract.

"You can bid into the market every day," said Stout.

"It offers a tremendous advantage in that it allows distributive decisions to
be made, how much a customer is willing to take for an energy entitlement,"
said Richard Tabors, president of the Cambridge, Mass.-based energy
consulting firm Tabors, Carmanis & Associates.
As Tabors points out, customers who sell back into the market obviously are
doing so to play the margin, to make money. But their efforts also will have
a serious impact on the spot market price.

"Every megawatt not consumed is a megawatt which doesn't have to be
produced," Tabors reasoned. "That lowers the marginal cost, the spot market
cost. It really comes down to what (specific megawatts) are worth to someone
and not worth to me."

Heavy users thrilled
Heavy industrial users already are thrilled with the regional negawatt
proposal. "We think it is a well thought-out program. We feel customers have
the right to buy power, they should have the right to sell power and ought to
be compensated like the generators," said John Anderson, executive director
of ELCON, the Electricity Consumers Resource Council, which represents large
industrial users from nearly every manufacturing sector.

Anderson favors this particular plan because it gives the customer choice*
sound familiar?*allowing it to determine when it shuts down or gives up its
power.

"This is voluntary. You know when you will be shut down and thus you won't
incur any damages," said Anderson. "Many proposals tell the customer to cut
usage, but it costs money for industrial users to just shut down. Command and
control proposals treat everyone alike*and they're not."

Stout said at least two vendors have expressed interest in taking part in the
Reliant proposal, with discussions already taking place with Automated Power
Exchange Inc. (APX).

"We have had discussions with Reliant; we're in the business of working with
generators," said John Melby, vice president for North American marketing for
Santa Clara, Calif.-based APX.

According to Melby, APX represents more than half the demand response in the
California ISO. He said the company could utilize key computer programs and
systems previously developed to get the region-wide negawatt program up and
running.

The down side
There could be a number of problems in moving forward with such a large plan.
Consultant Tabors, for example, pointed to the White House and the Bush
administration's seeming preoccupation with supply.

Harvard's Hogan said having the power available when needed was key, while
Reliant's Stout said the biggest hurdle was that many states prohibit retail
customers from selling load back into the wholesale market. An obvious
solution to that would be passage of the Barton bill; however, nothing is
certain in such a divided Congress.

Thus, Stout continues to travel the West pushing the negawatt program.
California Gov. Gray Davis was briefed on the plan some two weeks ago when he
called a meeting of all California's generators.

"We thought he (Davis) generally liked the idea," Stout said.

Next up on Reliant's hit list is S. David Freeman, former head of the Los
Angeles Department of Water and Power and now Davis' California energy
conservation "czar."

"We've already raised the issue with him (Freeman), but we're looking to plug
him in," Stout said.


Attached is the initial draft of the partnership agreement for Enron Net
Works Partners, L.P.  In light of the accelerated schedule to close the Net
Works equity fund, please forward your comments to me at your earliest
convenience.


Sara:
Great news!  I will give her a call on Monday!  Hope all is going well.
Again, I'm happy to participate in the legal/credit meeting on Tuesday by
phone.  Alos, do we need to go through my memo?  Just call or e-mail me.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton
	07/21/00 11:56 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Stephanie Panus just accepted!  She starts on August 7.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 03:04 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	02/22/2001 01:33 PM

		 To: <kaplan@iepa.com>, Joe Ronan <joer@calpine.com>, Sue Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Stephanie-Newell <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, Rob
Lamkin <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, Richard Hyde <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
Pigott Jack <jackp@calpine.com>, Paula Hall-Collins
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, Norton Kelli <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>,
"'Nam Nguyen'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, McNally Ray
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, Marty Wilson <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, Lynn
Lednicky <lale@dynegy.com>, Kristin Vellandi <kvellandi@pstrategies.com>,
kent Palmerton <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, Kassandra Gough
<kgough@calpine.com>, Julee Malinowski-Ball <jmball@ns.net>, John Stout
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, John Larrea <john.g.larrea@williams.com>,
Jeff Dasovich <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, Jan Smutny-Jones <smutny@iepa.com>,
Greg Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, Douglas Kerner <DKK@eslawfirm.com>, Curtis
Kebler <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, Bob Weisenmiller
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, Bob Escalante <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, Baker Carolyn
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, B Brown Andy <andybrwn@earthlink.net>, Andy Brown
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, Roger Pelote <roger.pelote@williams.com>,
<tross@mcnallytemple.com>, kent Palmerton <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, John
Larrea <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, Anne Kelly <kelly@hnks.com>, Chuck Cole
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>, Mike Monagan <mrmonagan@aol.com>, Susan Mccabe
<sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, Steven Kelly <steven@iepa.com>, Carol H Hudson
<Chudson@iepa.com>, <rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Market Response Conference Call Schedule for Today 2/22

Just a reminder that there is an IEP Market Response Call today, 2/22 at
1:30 pm PST.  The call in number will be 1-800-374-2393, Pass-code:
Independent Energy Producers. An agenda is below.

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

February 22, 2001

PR UPDATE

To:    IEP PR Committee
Fr:    Ray McNally, Richard Temple, Jean Munoz, Tom Ross
Re:    PR Update

Target Briefings

? Republican Caucus Briefing . 2/8
? Democrat Caucus Briefings . TBD
? Lawrence Lindsey, Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, and
Director of the National Economic Council . 3/2

Collateral Materials

? Web-site . www.turnonthetruth.com
? Rough and Tumble Ad . www.rtumble.com
? Seeing the Light Update . MRW making technical updates
? Weekly distribution. Public Power Handout,  QF article mock-up; Highlights
from the FERC report on Plant Outages, QF handout, Sacramento Bee article
mock-up
? California Journal Ad April
? The Power In Your District
? IEP folders

Research

? Recent polling results

Earned Media

? Teleconference briefings with press . On Fridays, or as needed
? Statewide and national media outreach . Ongoing
? Editorial Board Meetings .  Targeting: Sacramento Bee, LA Times, San
Francisco Chronicle, San Jose Mercury News, Alameda News Group, San Diego
Union Tribune

? Press Contacts:

 TV
? CBS Nightly News, w/ Dan Rather, John Blackstone reporting
? KCRA CH 3 Sacramento
? NBC Nightly News w/Tom Brokaw)
? KVIE, Ch.6, California Capitol Week
? CBC, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
o  CBS Sunday with Charles Osgood

Print Reporters/Columnists
? George Skelton, LA Times
? Mitchell Bensen, Wall Street Journal
? Jennifer Warren, LA Times
? Santa Maria Times, John Reed
? Los Angeles Daily Breeze
? Steve Geissenger, Oakland Tribune
? John Enswiller, Wall Street Journal
? Jim Sterngold, New York Times
? Hugo Martin, LA Times
? Brandon Bailey, San Jose Mercury News
? Dale Kasler, Sacramento Bee
? Jim Sands, Stockton Record
? Chris Keyser, McGraw Hill
? Emily Richmond, Palo Alto Daily News
? Leslie Berkman, Riverside Press Enterprise
? William Booth, Washington Booth
? Bill Lambrecht, St. Louis Post Dispatch
? Julie Tamaki, LA Times
? Amy Costello, NPR
? Jeff Stanfield, Generation Week
? Rob Thormeyer, McGraw Hill
? Richard Gonzales, National Public Radio
? Chris Martin, Bloomberg News
? Hanna Quak, Orange Co. Register
? Chris Palmary, Business Week Magazine
? John Wilkens, San Diego Union Tribune

Radio
? KPFK, LA, 90.7
? KCRW, Which Way LA
? KALW City Vision, Public Radio San Francisco
? KCCP FM, Los Angeles
? KPCC FM
? KALW

Participating in 1/24 or 1/26 Teleconference
? Gene Laverty, Bloomberg
? George Osterkamp, CBS news
? Jim Limbach, Associated Press
? Jim Kennett, Bloomberg News
? Gary Chase, KMJ Radio
? Mike Thornton, KVMR FM RADIO
? Mike Ward, KFBK Radio
? Todd Thornton, KCHO RADIO
? Ann Deroufigger, OIL AND GAS JOURNAL
? Craig Rose, San Diego Union Tribune
? David Ivanovich, Houston Chronicle
? Matthew J Donoval, KVEC Radio
? Paul Redding, KXBX Radio News
? Mark Howell, KUZZ Radio
? Eve Mitchell, Oakland Tribune
? Nick Roman, KLON RADIO
? George Lewis, NBC NEWS
? Barbara Shook, Energy Intelligence
? Arthur O'donnell, California Energy Markets
? Andrew Phemister, San Diego East County Times
? Julie Tamaki, LA Times
? Mike Montgomery, CAPITAL PUBLIC RADIO
? Carolyn Said, SF Chronicle
? Linda Gledhill, San Francisco Chronicle
? Rachel Mryow, KPCC
? Mike Sugarman, KCBS RADIO
? David Ivanovich Jr, HOUSTON CHRONICLE
? Tim Heardt, VENTURA COUNTY STAR
? Mike Taugher, The Contra Costa Times
? Scott Howard, KNVN CH 24
? Hugo Martin, LA Times
? Alan Zibel, Oakland Tribune
? Bob Garrett, Riverside Press Enterprise
? Ron Sumeda, Energy Analyst
? Don Andrews, Metro Networks
? Tim Anderacci, Bloomberg News
? Jim Steingold, NY Times
? Germain Ferman, Business Report
? Leslie Berkman, Press Enterprise
? Ramona Evans, St. Alina Star
? Kiki Tamaka, Los Angeles Times
? Rachel Myrow, KPPC
? Anndee Laskoe, ABC KESQ
? Doug Caldwell, San Jose Business Journal
? Christian Berthelsen, San Fransicso Chronicle
? Lynne Corum, McGraw Hill
? Chris Ko, Korea Times
? Jeff Barber, McGraw Hill
? Gus Thompson, Auburn Journal
? Ron Statler, KMJ News


At approximately 6:30 pm on 4/25 Ruth Ashe with PGE notified Enron that there
will be a voice mail outage starting the evening of 4/25 and running thru 2pm
on 4/26.  If you have any questions or concerns please contact her at
503-464-8663 or 503-323-1254.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.


I understand the control concern but it sure would allow us to be more efficient since Texas is small and clean (probably not a full time manager job).  He has not and will not be taking risk positions (at least not initially) he has been and will be trading our daily Waha phyical volumes.  If he evolved to a point where we wanted him to take risk positions we then could move him out of Risk.  What do you think?

If you don't think this will work let me know, but in that scenario I guess I would say don't count on Dave.  I guess I will have to move him into the Associate program or Logistics.  I we go down that road then I feel like I need to run this by Dave since he effectively will be cutting his ties to Risk and taking some career risk.  I am sure if it does not work out you or some other company would welcome Dave in a risk role.  Let me know what you think or just call me and we can get together.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:01 AM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	RE: Dave B

Let me know when you would like to discuss this.  In talking to the parties involved in this possible transaction,  they are very controls wary.  I can not see anyway they will go for having someone in a controls role, trading.  Also,  I will have lost about 30% of my staff by the time all is said and done, and will need every person on a full time basis.  I do not mind losing Dave since I have not had him in months,  so if we want to put him in logistics or some other function that reports up through commercial,  I would not have any problem with that.  Let me know when you would like to talk.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Thomas A.
Sent:	Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:31 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	RE: Dave B

Jeff,

Let's talk because I think it may make more sense to flip the other way.  I was hoping to continue using Dave in the morning in the cash trading activities.  So maybe he can run the Texas Risk group while trading phyical similar to what Daren is doing on the Logistics side.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 12:17 PM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	Dave B

Tom -

I am currently planning on having Dave run the west risk desk,  and leaving O over Texas.  So I just want to make sure that we are still on the same page with Dave coming back down here.  If not,  I need to make some changes to the organization.

Thanks