FYI
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meringolo, Peter
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 5:01 PM
> To: Fergus, Gary S.
> Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 9:59 AM
> To: Meringolo, Peter
> Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> FYI.
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:57 PM
> To: 'hym@cpuc.ca.gov'
> Cc: 'MBD'
> Subject: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>  Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
> production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued
> by the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the
> Commission").  The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in
> undertaking its investigation into the problems in the California electric
> markets by producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We
> believe that the production we propose will enable the Commission to
> commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
> litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
> which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
> pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email
> exchange of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission
> agrees that by cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents,
> the Enron Entities have not waived any objections or challenges to these
> subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims, defenses, objections,
> jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have been specifically
> reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.   For all of these
> proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from disclosure by the
> attorney client and attorney work product privileges.
>
>  Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
> for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
> be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
> duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
> As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
> production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
> wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
> offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do
> not propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.
>
> GENERAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 1 through 4
>
>  Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
> burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
> organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998
> is significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with
> exemplars of their current organizational charts, telephone directories
> and so called "family trees" to show its current organization.  To the
> extent that the Enron Entities can readily identify and locate exemplars
> of significant organizational charts, telephone directories or so called
> "family trees" for earlier periods they will also make those available.
> One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its corporate
> history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can provide it.
> With respect to the other Enron Entities, to the extent that corporate
> histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate producing
> these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.
>
> Requests 5 and 6
>
>  The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
> identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
> Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.  We believe this
> information will be sufficient to illustrate these relationships for the
> staff's purposes.
>
> FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 7 through 11
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
> requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
> will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data ( the
> "Transaction Documents") for the purchase and sale of energy delivered
> which information includes economic data.   We anticipate producing public
> filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic
> Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> GENERATING DOCUMENTS
> Requests 12, 14 and 18
>
>  For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
> facilities are either non-existent or limited in number and there will
> probably be limited documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent
> they act as a scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or
> resell generation output, do not have the specific documents that pertain
> to each generation unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than
> Portland General, do have documents and information for Las Vegas
> Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
> document productions.
>
>   For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
> would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
> twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
> Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about
> one half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
> effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
> California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  Nevertheless,
> Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000 electronic Transaction
> Documents in summary form similar to the data being provided by other
> Enron Entities, to the extent relevant as discussed below.  We propose
> that the Commission defer requesting production of other information until
> it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant
> proportion of their energy into the California market.  At that time a
> more accurate assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will
> be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the
> California wholesale market.
>
> TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
> Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19
>
>  We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
> the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and
> PX.  EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of relevant
> transaction data for year 2000 (in California and outside of California
> and Real Time) for the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the
> date, counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it
> is a purchase or a sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this
> information, it is possible that some entries will be incomplete or
> inaccurate.  For those
> transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
> understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
> not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide
> quickly.  The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to
> EPMI's customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
> business.  EES can also provide similar data with respect to relevant
> wholesale and retail transactions with the proviso that with respect to
> retail transactions it will not include the specific names of its retail
> customers but instead will provide a blind customer number due to EES'
> confidentiality obligations to those customers.  We anticipate producing
> the Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> FERC DOCUMENTS
>
> Request 20
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
> from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
> those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October
> 13, 2000.
>
>
>  Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
> Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
> Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
> make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
> production by then.
>
>  We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
> any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one
> currently in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions
> will be protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition,
> if, at the request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the
> Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests
> for production be limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities
> reserve the right to limit the production of documents in conformance with
> such order.
>
>  We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
> if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
> comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
> or myself.
>
> Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP
>
> Gary Fergus
>
>
>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


A reminder,   I am 55 mws long for hours 23 & 24 today.   This has been scheduled into the North Zone.    If you sell make sure that you cut the Enpower deal and make the appropriate entries in the Portal.   Enpwr deal   834600   is the sale to North Zone.

The Ercot Asset desk is long 5 mw's  for the offpeak hours at $9.20.   The  Enpwr deal number is #836534
If you sell hours 1-6,  cut this sale to Ercot Imbal and replace with the appropriate counterparty under Hourly Ercot book.    We will leave

Additionally,   Frontera needs to sell the following:

hour ending 4 - 30 mw's
he 5 - 30 mws
he 6 - 85 mw's
Put these purchases/ sales in the Teco Services book.

I have sold them the power swap where I sell them 100 mw for 7&8 ($25).    I then pay the pool price.    If prices somehow appear that they will be greater than $25 for these hours,  please cover and schedule to the South Zone

The Swap went very well today,  since we had a physical position:

Although the physical may lose $1500,  the financial swap will make $17,000.

Here's how it works:
When you buy balday,   you buy fixed ($30) and sell floating (Ercot Pool)
Today I sold fixed ( $37) and bought floating.

The floating components cancel and we are left with a $7 margin.

Call if you have questions.
JMF


Yes, to North America, Australia and Japan.

	Karen Lambert
	09/07/2000 04:30 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Online Weather Trading

Does this apply only to the North American contracts and weather trades for
which you are responsible?
Does the instruction below apply to Australia and Japan ISDA's?

From: Tana Jones on 09/07/2000 12:17 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Online Weather Trading

Per my conversations with Mark Taylor, we should continue to put any weather
trades done online under any relevant master agreement with the
counterparty.  Further, there is no prohibition against doing a trade online
with a counterparty when we do not have a master in place.  Any non-master
trades would go under the respective GTC.  It appears to be only a
coincidence that we are trading online only with counterparties we have
masters in place with.


Nick,

The airport is about 30 minutes  by cab from the office (1400 Smith).
The best hotel is either Hyatt Regency Downtown or Doubletree
Downtown (it is important to emphasize Downtown when making
reservations). The hotels are within a walking distance
from  the Enron building.

We can make reservations  for dinner around 6:30 - 7:00
in a resturant  within 10 minutes by car from the hotel.

By the way, we shall be very glad to reimburse you for the trip related
expenses.

Vince

Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 05/11/2000 05:31:53 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
Subject: Re: Visit to Enron

Vince,

Yes, that would be ideal. But let me call first my travel agent to
see if there is a flight that would satisfy all the other
constraints. What time should I be at Enron on Thursday, and how far is
the airport from your offices?

Thanks,

Nick

Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> Nick,
>
> Can you come to Houston Thursday night and meet me, Stinson and
> Kevin Hannon (one of top 3 executives at Enron Broadband Services)
> for dinner?
>
> Vince
>
> Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 05/10/2000 10:49:46 AM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:   Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
> Subject:  Re: Visit to Enron
>
> Vince,
>
> Many thanks for arranging that. Yes, Friday 05/26/00 is good.
> I'm blocking off in my calendar May 26 for the visit.
>
> Again, many thanks. I look forward to seeing you and Stinson
> in two weeks.
>
> Nick
>
> Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > Nick,
> >
> > Thanks for your message. The best date for a visit to Enron
> > would be Friday, May the 26th. Please, let me know if this date would
> work
> > for you.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> > Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 05/01/2000 04:26:30 AM
> >
> > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Visit to Enron
> >
> > Vince,
> >
> > How are you? Hope all is well.
> >
> > Is there any chance we can schedule my visit to Enron on Friday, May 19,
> > or Friday, May 26?
> >
> > By the end of April I was able to attract a top new student to work on
> the
> > project.
> > The other one for the coming year will be Giuseppe. By spending the
> summer
> > at Enron, he will be in a position to bring the new one up to speed and
> > create an intellectual team here at Stanford to look at these problems.
> >
> > I must move ahead soon to put the project in place and get the work
> going.
> >
> > Talk to you soon,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Nick,
> > >
> > > We can close the loop on our commitment to support the research
> projects
> > > before your visit to Enron.
> > >
> > > My assistant, Shirley  Crenshaw, will call you to set up a conference
> > call
> > > with me, Stinson Gibner,
> > > and Tom Gros from Enron Broadband Services to discuss all the isssues.
> > > Friday this week would work for
> > > both Tom and me. I think we need about 15 minutes.
> > >
> > > Vince
> > >
> > > P.S. Shirley, Nick's phone number is 650 796 8163 (cell), 650-725-5525
> > > (office).
> > >
> > > Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 03/12/2000 05:32:35 PM
> > >
> > > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, bambos@stanford.Stanford.EDU
> > > cc:
> > > Subject:  Visit to Enron
> > >
> > > Hello Vince,
> > >
> > > It was nice seeing you at Stanford and many thanks for the lunch
> > > we had together. I really enjoyed our discussions, both at the
> > > technical level and otherwise.
> > >
> > > I promised to send you an e-mail regarding possible dates for
> > > a visit to Enron. I delayed it for a week till my schedule was
> > > clearer. Let's see if we can get a match with your schedule -
> > > mine is rather terrible:
> > >
> > > Friday, 21st of April looks good. But April 23rd is Easter
> > > Sunday, so that may make it difficult for some people at Enron
> > > to be around. Let me know if that is the case. I am willing to
> > > visit then, because the week after that I am scheduled to be in
> > > Japan and in the previous weeks I am all committed on Fridays.
> > >
> > > Friday, 19th of May is the next possibility, but this probably
> > > is too far out. The main problem is that I am operating within
> > > a window of opportunity for attracting top students for this
> > > research. This window closes by the end of April, and it would be
> > > important for the student support funds to be in place then, so
> > > that I can make hard commitments to students and attract top
> > > talent. I am already reviewing files of students who have
> > > approached me for PhD advising, and I am in a mode of doing "soft
> > > commitments to star-level students" to get this research and its
> > > potential on their radar screen. Top students are highly sought
> > > after by advisors and I want to be an early player in this
> > > competition.
> > >
> > > Does my visit to Enron have to happen before we can set up the
> > > project and student support at Stanford? If so, doing it before the
> > > end of April is important for getting top people. If the visit can
> > > happen after we get the ball rolling, then we can schedule it in May.
> > > I assume there will be multiple visits both ways when the project gets
> > > going. Please let me know what you think.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Nick


Julissa - Please forward to all your teams (per phone message from Mary
Solmonson)........

Sally Beck plans to hold a floor meeting today at 3pm ( our end of the 37th
floor).  She will discuss  the changes in Mary Solmonson's groups.   Please
plan to be available.

Thank you,
Sandy


put on calendar
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000
05:57 PM ---------------------------
From: Alan Aronowitz on 10/04/2000 04:42 PM
Sent by: Nony Flores
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Hicks/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eileen
Kisluk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, James P
Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael J
Gasper/HOU/ECT@ECT, John H Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Philips/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Foust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Travis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Renee
Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Nelly Carpenter/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Annual Oil Spill Crisis Management Training

Please reserve Thursday, October 19, 2000 from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. to
participate in our third  annual oil spill training program.  Some of you
were part of the task force that helped to design the Oil Spill Crisis
Management Plan, and it is well recognized that periodic training is an
essential part of implementing the Plan.  The training program (8:30 a.m. -
noon) and a brief tabletop exercise (1:00 p.m.- 3:00 p.m.) are being designed
by ENA Legal and Enron Global Markets Commercial Support (Scott Earnest and
Kevin Sweeney), and our oil spill consultant, Robert J. Meyers and
Associates, Inc. Typically, these types of programs run for 3 or 4 days, but
we have condensed the curriculum so that we can get sufficiently trained in
3/4's of a day.  We believe that this intensive training effort will give us
all a chance to learn more about the Plan and the role that each of us are
assigned.  The company,s success in dealing with a future spill crisis will
depend on how well we are prepared to perform in such circumstances.

The training is scheduled to occur in Houston in the Enron Building in Room
49C1.  If any other person in your group should be included in this program,
please let Nony Flores know at ext. 37541 and we will add them to the list.
A full copy of the Plan will be distributed during training.

Thanks again for your participation in this very important effort.

Regards,

Alan Aronowitz
Harry Collins
Kevin Sweeney
Scott Earnest


ok , well lets make it soon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:50 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I will too

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:46 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

you wont get in trouble

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:46 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yeah right

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:45 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

lets go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:45 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I'm always ready

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:45 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i know what a perfect day, ready

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:44 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I'm not so sore anymore, it's only certain days now, not all the time.  It sure looks like it's raining outside (hint-hint)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:43 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

im a little hung over, i was here for a little while yesterday, are you still sore

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:42 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I think you need to too.  I am feeling okay, except for this headache that is creeping up.  How are you today?  Were you here yesterday?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:41 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

thats a very good point, i need to work that out, how are you feeling

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:40 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I know, but if you were my boss, then I would be able to

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:40 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

you cant unfortunately

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:40 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

let's go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:39 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:39 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

and I'm ready to anytime

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:39 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

you can anyway

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:37 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I think so, I would treat you better than she can

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:36 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

we will have to work on that in the future

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:36 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

No, I'm actually pretty happy about the deal.  Not as happy as I would be if I were working for you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:35 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

thats not bad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:35 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Yeah, right.  I wish! I am working for Chris still and Scott Neal.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:34 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

perfect, are you working with me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:32 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

We're going to be sitting kina close after the move.


Attached is a link to the team's website.  Please bookmark the site or save
this message for continued access to the site.

The Discussion section is intended for the whole team for posting.  The
Library, Calendar, and Task sections are to for population only by Rick
Shapiro, Ginger Dernehl, Jim Steffes, Marcia Linton, Janel Guerrero, and John
Neslage.

Your log-in id is - your first name <space> last name - in lower case, and
your password is first two letters of first name * first two letters of last
name.
Example:  joe smith and jo*sm

Please contact me at 713-853-3896 if you have any problems accessing the
site, or if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Your AppsOnline Web Address (URL) is:
http://quickplace-2.interliant.com/californiasolutions | QP | quickplace-2


Jim - Pls. advise if we need to set up a Board meeting for tomorrow.  I know it might be necessary to re-vote and was waiting for a clear "go". I have not heard from Ken.   Thanks, Paula


Hey Jon,
Again Congratualations on your baby, that's great.  My sister just had her
second two weeks ago.  Megan and I will be in DC the weekend after the 4th of
July for a wedding, will you guys be their that weekend, if so it would be
great to see you guys?  Hope all is going well and talk to you soon.
Ben

713-853-7998 - Work


did i say something wrong?


Cool.  Sending messages in real-time.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson, Linda
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:08 PM
To: 'dwatkiss@bracepatt.com'; 'acomnes@enron.com'; Steffes, James D.;
'rfrank@enron.com'; 'smara@enron.com'; 'snovose@enron.com'
Subject: Re: Ripple Order

Congrats team
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Sara,
May I have a copy of the Morgan Stanley Prime Broker Agreement and the
Overseas Lending Agreement.
Jeff and I have been talking to Goldman Sachs about a similar arrangement and
wanted to re-review the Morgan Stanley structure.
Thank. Sheila


Attached is a revised letter to Jim Hawes for your review.


Are you available? I thought you might be interested since DDuran will
apparently be there.  I'm scheduled for vacation. I'll arrange an invite if
you are interested.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/14/2001 03:29
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           03/14/2001 01:50 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth
White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Development Efforts

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001
01:50 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Lisa Zarsky @ ECT                           03/14/2001 01:36 PM

To: W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Churbock/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Hausinger/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg
Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Tina Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Development Efforts

Per Dave Duran's request I scheduled the following meeting.
Please mark you calendars to attend

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2001

@ 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

EB 3321

RE: DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS

If there are any conflicts with date and time please respond immediately to
me at 3-4321.

Thank You,

Lisa


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bates, Kimberly
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Ames, Chuck; Brawner, Sandra F.; Germany, Chris; Hodge, John; Keavey, Peter F.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Neal, Scott; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; Ring, Andrea; Savvas, Leonidas; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Barbe, Robin; Concannon, Ruth; Goodell, Scott; Jones, David; Kaiser, Jared; Loving, Scott; Muhl, Gil; Smith, Maureen; Smith, Shauywn; Taylor, Craig; Willis, Jim; Zivley, Jill T.
Subject:	Networking Resources

www.carrerweb.com
http://content.monster.com
www.energyjobs.com
www.dukeenergy.com
www.williams.com
www.reliantenergy.com
www.nisource.com
www.headhunter.net
www.calpine.com

Kimberly Bates
East Gas/Origination
713-853-5193
713-646-8453 Fax


Thank you for the feedback.  We're "sanitizing" the document a wee bit
(taking out the "opposing view--response" part).  When that's done, I assume
it will OK to distribute.  Karen?

Best,
Jeff

	Susan M Landwehr
	05/15/2001 11:12 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Backgrounder for McNealy

Jeff--I just today had a chance to review this document.  If you're still
looking for comments I have one suggestion.

Under section 1 you list the problem and then the solution and then use the
heading "Don't make matters worse".  If you could somehow highlight that
section--make it stand out more.  The folks that you are trying to
reach--business leaders---understand capital markets and how all of the
rhetoric and investigations and allegations can discourage investment.

I would like to be able to send this document when you get it finished to
some of our contacts in the gov's offices--ok with you?

Lastly, I love the chart on growth.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	05/14/2001 12:08 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Backgrounder for McNealy

Greetings:
As folks heard, Ken Lay met with some California CEOs last Friday back East.
As a result of that meeting, McNealy, CEO for Sun, asked for some background
and more detail on what Ken Lay proposed as a solution for California during
his meetings in California over the past couple of weeks.  McNealy and others
have expressed a willingness to make phone calls to policymakers, etc. to try
to advance the ball.

I pulled this together very hastily on Friday and take responsibility for all
errors, omissions, ramblings, etc.  Wanted to distribute, however, to make
sure that all had the info that is getting distributed.  Know folks are busy,
but this will likely get distributed to other CEOs this week, so any
comments, suggestions, etc. about how to improve are welcome and appreciated.

Best,
Jeff


Mr Lay,
To suggest that I am merely disappointed by Enron's
performance in both the public markets and the broader
corporate universe is an understatement.

Enron is at a crossroads with one path leading to
irrelevance assigned to companies unable to rise in
the face of crisis, and the other path being reserved
for those that not only survive, but come out
stronger. I'm sure you can easily identify examples of
each without my help.

Every individual in management and oversight (the
Board of Directors) shares the blame and
responsibility to take drastic action and come clean.
Enron now has a higher bar of corporate governance
than other publicly traded companies due to the
reckless squandering of trust that resulted from
actions of many individuals who believed they were
clever and crafty, or just plain greedy. Furthermore,
I strongly suggest to you that many senior managers
within the corporate suites of Enron no longer have a
place in the company, quite possibly that may include
yourself. A clean break and a thorough cleaning is
clearly required.

In years past, when asked about the companies that I
admired and watched, Enron always was on the short
list. Sadly, I can no longer say that.

Jeff Nolan, an Enron shareholder

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


John:

I have not seen the legal opinion yet from Brazilian counsel [Dr. Pinto] on
our dollar indexing issue.  Please forward to me so I can review the opinion
and get final approval for the deal.

Regards,

Mark


insiderSCORES.com nightly alert for Thursday, December 14, 2000
The Official Scorer of Insider Trading

Today's U.S. Insider Commentary

--------------------------------Advertisement------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________

Investing + Technology = Individual Investing Made Easy!

 A Revolutionary System for Stocks! Now, individuals can use the same
 profitable research & investment methods employed by Wall Street
 professionals and successful portfolio managers.
 http://www.indigoinvestor.com/ppm/insiderscores11a.html
__________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

These 'Breaking News' articles were recently posted to the site:

Officer Makes First Insider Purchase at Cooper Industries Inc. in Two Years
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1557

Consensus Selling at Professional Detailing, Inc. Near All-Time High
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1559

Consensus Selling at Bear Stearns Follows Stock High
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1561

All Star Makes Worldcom Inc`s First Buy Since March 1999
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1558

CEO Makes First Insider Purchase at TD Waterhouse Group Inc in Six Months
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1560

-----------------------------Network ad------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________

See what institutional traders are doing with your stock Free...all
day...online...
And on your desk every open, mid-day and close.
Thomson I-Watch:  Your window into institutional activity.
Go to http://www.thomsoninvest.net/iwatch/iwatch_reg.sht
<http://iw.thomsoninvest.net>
___________________________________________________________________________

- Today's Most Predictive Insider Transactions:

Insider LANE [score: 100] Buys 4,000 shares of
SYNALLOY CORP [SYNC]

Insider MARKS [score: 98] Buys 31,400 shares of
COMPUTER TASK GROUP INC [CTG]

Insider MCMANUS [score: 97] Buys 9,500 shares of
MISONIX INC [MSON]

Insider SARTI [score: 93] Buys 5,000 shares of
SONOSITE INC [SONO]

Insider BEITZEL [score: 92] Buys 20,000 shares of
COMPUTER TASK GROUP INC [CTG]

Insider EDHOLM [score: 94] Sells 100,000 shares of
BRIO TECHNOLOGY INC [BRIO]

Insider KANNER [score: 92] Sells 1,321 shares of
BIO TECHNOLOGY GENERAL CORP [BTGC]

Insider CASSIDY [score: 90] Sells 5,500 shares of
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP [UTX]

Insider THEMELIS [score: 89] Sells 24,000 shares of
BITWISE DESIGNS INC [BTWS]

Insider KERN [score: 89] Sells 2,000 shares of
VIB CORP [VIBC]

http://www.insiderscores.com

If you would like to UNSUBSCRIBE from this service, please visit:
http://www.insiderscores.com/unsubscribe

******************************************************************
Interested in achieving advertising results? Contact Drew Doyle at
1-480-367-9449 x284 or mailto:adplace@insidersb.com


February 28, 2001
Notice No. 01-73

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBER FIRMS
ALL COMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
William B. Meyer Warehouse ) New Haven, CT

The Exchange has been advised by William B. Meyer, a COMEX Licensed Warehouse
for Copper, that they have sold their facility located at 2 Poplar Street in
New Haven, Connecticut.  Therefore, this facility is no longer available for
the storage of copper deliverable against the COMEX Division Grade 1 Copper
Futures Contract.  There is no copper stored in this facility.

Pending approval by the NYMEX Executive Committee, NYMEX Board of Directors,
and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, this facility will be delisted
from the list of COMEX Licensed Warehouses for Copper.

Should you have any questions or require any further information please
contact Albert J. Getz at 212-299-2608.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-73)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Mike Grigsby will be out of the office today and tommorrow on vacation. If he needs to be reached, please let me know.

Ina Rangel
Administrative Coordinator
Enron North America
713-853-7257 Voice
713-646-3604 Fax


Here are some more thoughts:
FERC should take a hard look at why the ISO is almost always in an "inc"
situation in real time.  Without structural incentives to go short into real
time, I would expect the CAISO to "inc" in some hours and "dec" in others --
with no consistent patterns.
The IOU's have four choices for purchasing power:  PX Block Forward, PX Day
Ahead, PX Day Of, and CAISO Ex Post.  They had ample opportunity to purchase
lower cost power in the PX Block Forward but didn't buy enough.  That left
them short in the Day Ahead.  They can reduce Day Ahead prices by moving some
of their load to the Ex Post market.  Dave Parquet did an Econ 101
presentation on this incentive at the CAISO board meeting in June.
The ISO remains primarily in "inc" mode even during the shoulder months when
prices are lower, another indicator that the real time "inc" problem is
driven by the load side rather than the supply side.  The IOU's continue to
go short into the ISO Ex Post market even when the CAISO Ex Post price is
consistently above the PX Day Ahead price.
There is evidence that the IOU's are not willing to pay above the CAISO price
cap for energy from the PX in the Day Ahead market.  Does it matter that the
price cap for the ISO also acts as a PX price cap?
The NOx market in California is very tight.  How has this contributed to
higher costs and has the complete lack of available NOx credits prevented any
generators from running?
How large was the impact of the below normal water year on the supply side?
The attached presentation quantifies this effect in the Northwest.  (I have a
theory on how hydro capacity completely overstates reserve margins in the
west from an economic perspective.  I can go into more detail if you wish.)
Friction between California PX and ISO markets and other western markets.
For example, why are actual flows going into the state yet prices out side of
the state are higher?  Another example of anomylous behavior is at COB on
8/11 and 8/12.  There was congestion from California TO the northwest those
days in the Day Ahead market.  In real time the NW ended up being a net
seller of about 3,000 MW from the NW TO California.
Demand Side - we really need to press on this issue because all of the
proponents of price caps claim that as soon as the demand side is "workably
competitive" then there is no need for price caps.  Is large-scale economic
demand response required for a competitive market?  What if demand response
is there, but at very high prices?  The demand response in California is a
joke.  With 2700 MW of interuptible, why did the utilities and the CAISO only
get around 600 MW of economic demand response.  Much of this response comes
at $1500/MWh.  The assymetric treatment of supply side resources and demand
side resources can be justified on environmental grounds, but not economic
grounds.  So why this assymetric treatment?  This gets to the question of the
fine line between "scarcity rents" which are ok, and market power which is
not.  If power is scarce, and demand truly values it at $1500/MWh then
shouldn't that be the price.  At what price would the rest of the
interuptible load economically curtail?  Bottom line -- there are about 2,000
MW of load that should be able to respond to price signals that chooses not
to or values power at more than $1500/MWh.
Burden of proof -- what empirical measures should be used to assess market
power?  The reports published to date have been unimpressive.  The Market
Analysis Unit report, for example, does a bunch of handwaving and then
concludes that there is market power.  But they never explain why.  I would
think that proof might be something like this:  Generator X sets price y% of
the time when loads exceed Z MWs.  Or, four generators set price 80% of the
time when prices exceed $200/MWh.  They have all the data to be able to tell,
yet they don't provide any empirical measures.  The only test I've heard of
so far is the UC Energy Institute report that demonstrates that generators
are submitting bids above their marginal cost.  The PX report states that
supply bids are fewer and at higher prices than last year.  They fail to
mention the fact that there are 5,000 fewer MW of hydro this year relative to
last.

James D Steffes@EES
08/17/2000 06:18 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno
Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FERC INVESTIGATION IN CA - What should they be looking for?

As we begin to meet with FERC Staff on the Wholesale market issues related to
CA problems, I think that we need to put together a list of questions that
FERC needs to be asking Western power market participants.

The following are some questions that I think are important to have FERC ask;
I'm sure there are more.

1. Were California utilities underscheduling load into the PX day ahead
market?
2. How many MWs did the CA ISO procure during each hour during the Summer
2000?  How does this compare with CA ISO procurement during 1999?
3. Has PG&E changed its bidding behavior associated with its Hydro facilities
in 2000?
3. Are there baseload facilities that were operated differently in 2000 than
in 1999?
4. Were any generation plants off-line due to unplanned maintenance during
Summer 2000?
5. How did the CA ISO demand side program work?  Why didn't more load
participate?
6. What options did SDG&E have to "hedge" its retail rates?  What were prices
in the CAL PX block forward market on Jan 15, 2000 and May 15, 2000?
7. How high did natural gas prices go in California for generation during
Summer 2000?
8. Were other Western power markets prices higher (year-on-year)?
9. Did the CA ISO Board face political pressure to reduce bid caps?  Is this
appropriate for a FERC jurisdictional entity?
10. What specific details is SDG&E referring to in its Complaint on
"unworkably competitive" CA ISO markets?  Can these be fixed "quickly"?

Please add other questions.

Jim


If you're referring to the Tues/Thur call, we've talked some and thought we'd go to once per week with Sacramento folks having the option of callling in, since the Legislature's gone until January. You have thoughts on the Monday call?  That one may not be as critical anymore.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Sun 10/7/2001 9:52 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Mara, Susan
Cc:
Subject:

Should we set up a different call schedule for CA given the new environment - maybe just once a week?

If we do, we need to send out a notice to the key business people.

Thanks


I'm writing from houston (TX) and I cannot find anyone here who shows your
furniture.  Can you direct me to some one in this part of the country?  I
have large outdoor spaces that I'd like to furnish with Brown Jordan.

Thanks for your help.

Jeff


Our department will be migrated to Outlook in two groups.  The first group
will be migrated on Monday, June 11,  and the second group will be migrated
on Tuesday, June 12.   You will receive four e-mails from the Outlook
migration team.  Please do not delete them.  You will need to open the four
e-mails and follow the instructions to migrate to Outlook.

Assistants, you will be responsible for scheduling training for yourself and
your assignments.  It is recommended everyone attend a one hour training
class.  Training can be scheduled by contacting Maggie Cruz at extension
3-1816.  (Assistants, please coordinate training with your backup so both of
you are not in training at the same time.)  Outlook migration specialists
will be on the 38th floor to answer questions Tuesday and Wednesday, June 12
and 13.

Listed below is useful information provided to us by the Outlook Migration
team.

E-mail Policies

Users will be restricted to a Mailbox size of 100 MB.

Further mailbox size restrictions are detailed as follows:

Issue Warning at 75 MB - users are automatically sent a warning from the
System Administrator explaining they are near their Mailbox limit.

Prohibit Send at 100 MB - users are prevented from sending e-mail, yet they
can still receive internal and external messages.  Users must reduce the size
of their mailbox by deleting old mail, saving attachments to a local drive,
etc. before they can send e-mail again.

Inbound/Outbound Mail Size Limits - inbound and outbound e-mail messages will
be limited to a size of 10MB.

Deleted Item Retention - users will be able to recover deleted items from
their mailbox as old as 8 days.  Deleted items include e-mail messages,
folders, contacts, calendar entries, tasks, notes, journal entries and
meeting notices.

Archiving - archiving will not be a supported feature of Outlook 2000.

Migration Preparation

Clean Your Mailbox - due to new space limitations on your mailbox, you are
advised to clean your Notes mailbox of old, unneeded messages BEFORE
migration.  If you are at the 100MB limit on the day of migration, you will
not be able to send messages once you are in Outlook.

Limits on Items Migrated  - from the day of your migration, only 30 days of
old mail will be migrated from your mailbox.  This includes mail in your
inbox and other folders.  Calendar items dating back one year from the day of
migration will be migrated (with the exception of repeating appointments).

The following people will be migrated Monday evening, June 11.

Adams, Suzanne
Bushman, Teresa
Cash, Michelle
Clark, Bart
Corbet, Nancy
Daniels, Eddy
Davis, Angela
Dickson, Stacy
Edison, Andy
Elbertson, Janette
FitzGerald, Genia
Flores, Nony
George, Robert H.
Goode, Diane
Guinn, Linda
Haedicke, Mark
Hansen, Leslie
Hearn, Ed
Heinitz, Mary
Hodge, Jeff
Legal Temp 1
Legal Temp 2
Legal Temp 3
Legal Temp 4
Mann, Kay
Maxwell, Matt
McCullough, Travis
Meraz, Claudia
Mellencamp, Lisa
Milligan, Taffy
Moore, Janet H.
Nemec, Gerald
Nettelton, Marcus
Ogden, Mary
Perlingiere, Debra
Portz, David
Sager, Elizabeth
Sanders, Richard
Simmons, Linda
Sol,, Carlos
St. Clair, Carol
Sweet, Twanda
Tweed, Sheila
Van Hooser, Steve
White, Ann Elizabeth
Zucha, Theresa

The following people will be migrated Tuesday evening, June 12.

Aronowitz, Alan
Bailey, Susan
Boyd, Samantha
Braddy, Martha
Bruce, Robert
Bruck, Sarah
Carolan, Dominic
Castillo, Connie
Collins, Harry
Cook, Mary
Crady, Ned
del Vecchio, Peter
Doucette, Margaret
Farrell, Keegan
Ferguson, Samantha
Garcia, Nita
George, Carolyn
Gray, Barbara
Greenberg, Mark
Gresham, Wayne
Haas, Merrill
Heard, Marie
Hendry, Brent
Jones, Tana
Keiser, Holly
Koehler, Anne
Korkmas, Deb
Lauterbach, Elizabeth
Legal Temp 5
Legal Temp 6
Legal Temp 7
Lindeman, Cheryl
Lovelady, Steven
Lyons, Dan
Martinez, Mary Helen
Mayer, Laurie
Murray, Julia Heintz
Nachawati, Majed
Nelson,  Cheryl
Panus, Stephanie
Pinto Leite, Francisco
Rivera, Coralina
Robison, Michael
Rogers, Daniel
Sayre, Frank
Shackleton, Sara
Shanks, Reginald
Spencer, Becky
Stoler, Lou
Taylor, Mark
Viverito, John
Young, Randy

Many thanks for your help in making this a smooth migration to Outlook.

Nony Flores and Janette Elbertson


Greg, Jeff and Stan:

I just received a call from David Dehaemers at Kinder, Morgan.  They are interested in buying Transwestern and offered to have Rich call Ken - but I waived that off in order to get a read from you all.

With respect to the merits, if a preferred at the pipe level is being treated as effectively debt by the rating agencies, a sale is roughly equivalent to a preferred with respect to both ratings and liquidity.  In addition, the sale should provide greater proceeds due to lower cost of funds and may have a higher probability of success.  One key issue will be funding the sale at signing or HSR rather than regulatory approval.

I first wanted to test you three, and if supportive, determine the best path upon which to proceed including gaining Dynegy's consent.

Jeff


Dave just called and was nice enough to inform me that he, also, sat down in
the LPS pool.  He picked Tennessee.
If anyone else discovers an error please let me know.

Eldon


Here is a copy just for completeness.

HK
---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 06/19/2002
11:45 AM ---------------------------

Hollis Kimbrough
06/19/2002 11:23 AM
To: Leonard Mason/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Bo Thisted/EWC/Enron@Enron, Harvey Kaura/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Lindquist/EWC/Enron@Enron, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: DMP SPC Results

Attached please find a new Statistical Process Control analytic which
displays the turbine performance for your site.  The report pdf is a summary
of the other two reports and delineates which turbines fall outside the 2
sigma line for each category.  The other two reports provide more detail
regarding the turbine performance including the degree to which a turbine
falls outside the 2 sigma line.

Please note that we are still working with the analytic and you will find
some extraneous characters in the results.  Please add these characters in
with the main group for which they are intended.  We will have them removed
from the code next month.

Best Regards,
Hollis


?
?	'VentureWire'
	Monday, December 04, 2000	?
?	CONTENTS | COMPANIES | INVESTORS	?
?

	top stories

	* Online Broker Datek Gets $700 Million, Will Spin Off Island
	* Online Marketing Firm iChoose Shuts Down
	* Quova Names Ex-Telocity Exec President & CEO, Adds to Board
	* Web Security Firm @Stake Gets $26 Million in Second Round

	Optix 2001 Features Creme de la Creme of the Industry

	Ask yourself: if Patrick Nettles, Chairman and CEO of Ciena,
	and Kerry Vahala, Professor of Applied Physics at the
	California Institute of Technology, are speaking at Optix
	2001, shouldn't I register to attend? It's been labeled the
	"must-attend" event of the year and is certain to be the
	optimal chance for networking with key players in the industry.

	In addition, 48 CEOs representing the best and brightest
	private optical communications companies will expound their
	business plans and future goals to others in the industry.

	Participation at this event is subject to approval and is
	limited to senior executives involved in the optical com-
	munications industry. For your registration pack, link
to:http://www.optix2001.com/

	new money

	* Net Security Firm Mazu Gets $8 Million Series A, New CEO
	* Commerce Software Firm Momenta Gets $5 Million Round One
	* Mobile Commerce Firm ViaFone Gets $23 Million in Round Two
	* B2B Content Portal Hetairia Gets $250,000 in Additional Seed
	* Warner Music Group to Take Stake in Echo Networks

	bad news

	* Walker Digital May Have Violated Labor Rules in Layoffs
	* B2B Tech and Support Firm NetSales Cuts 40% of Staff
	* Reward Program Stockback.com Lays Off 50% of Staff

	new products

	* Speed Ventures and Sonera Launch Idea Tester BreedLab

	m&a

	* Aggregration Firms Yodlee and VerticalOne Merge
	* E-Learning Firm Wide Learning Acquires Financial Directions
	* Procurement Firm Simplexis Acquires Bid Tech Firm NISBIC
	* GeoAccess Acquires Sweetwater Health from Bankrupt Caredata

	new directors

	* Medical App Firm ClinicManager Names New Board Member

	new people

	* Workforce ASP Interactive Software Systems Names President

	vw corrections

	* Allegis Capital
	* Internet Publishing Group

	TOP STORIES... NEW MONEY... BAD NEWS... NEW PRODUCTS... M&A... NEW
DIRECTORS... NEW PEOPLE... VW CORRECTIONS

	?	?	?	VentureFinance:The private equity authority.?	?	Every month VentureFinance tells you where venture?	capitalists are investing and why, which has made it?	a must read for angels, fund managers, investment bankers,?	general partners, and specialists in buyouts and business?	development. From Technologic Partners, following private?	investments since 1985.http://technologicpartners.com/tp/vf/?	?	?	top stories?	??	Online Broker Datek Gets $700 Million, Will Spin Off Island?

	ISELIN, N.J. (VENTUREWIRE) -- Datek Online Holdings, an Internet securities
broker, said that a group of investors led by Bain Capital and including TA
Associates and Silver Lake Partners have bought a $700 million majority stake
in the company. Datek will acquire all voting shares of its original
shareholders, including former CEO Jeffrey Citron. As part of the deal, the
investors will spin off Island ECN, an off-market network for trading
securities, as a separate company. Datek will own 10% of Island. Island's
board of directors will consist of current management and members of the
investment group. Datek previously received backing from Group Arnault of
France, TA Associates, and Vulcan Ventures.
	http://www.datek.com
	http://www.island.com

	Online Marketing Firm iChoose Shuts Down
	?	?	DALLAS (VENTUREWIRE) -- iChoose, a developer of e-commerce marketing systems, ?said it has shut down due to lack of funding. In the past couple of months, ?the company has struggled to stay alive by seeking out additional funding, ?and even signed a letter of intent to be acquired. That  acquisition fell ?through and the company said it had no other choice than to close. iChoose ?was unable to disclose the would-be-acquirer due to legal restrictions. On ?its Web site, the company posted a message with uninstall instructions for ?its software and a final farewell to its customers. iChoose was backed by ?Sevin Rosen. ?	http://www.ichoose.com?	?	Quova Names Ex-Telocity Exec President & CEO, Adds to Board?

	REDWOOD CITY, Calif.  (VENTUREWIRE) -- Quova, which provides businesses with
Internet infrastructure intelligence services, said it appointed Marie
Alexander as its new president and CEO. Ms. Alexander previously served as
the vice president of strategic relationships at residential DSL firm
Telocity. Quova also said that Emerick Woods, president and CEO of Vicinity,
will join Quova's board of directors. Backers for Quova include Softbank
Technology Ventures, IDG Ventures, Nexus Group, Fidelity Investments, and
Schoffstall Ventures.
	http://www.quova.com

	Web Security Firm @Stake Gets $26 Million in Second Round
	?	?	CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (VENTUREWIRE) -- @stake, a provider of Internet security ?services, said it raised $26 million in its second round of funding. ?Investors included Madison Dearborn Partners and previous investor Battery ?Ventures. Individual investors in the round included Bruce Claflin, president ?and COO of 3Com; Paul Sagan, president of Akamai Technologies; William ?Cadogan, chairman, president, and CEO of ADC Telecom; Bob Palmer, former ?chairman, president and CEO of Digital Equipment; Eckard Pfieffer, chairman ?of Intershop and former CEO of Compaq Computer; Morgan O'Brien, co-founder of ?Nextel Communications; and Robert J. Davis, CEO of Terra-Lycos. The company ?will use the funding toward research and new marketing programs. ?	http://www.atstake.com?	?	new money?	??	Net Security Firm Mazu Gets $8 Million Series A, New CEO?

	CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (VENTUREWIRE) -- Mazu Networks, which provides Internet
security technology, said it has secured $8 million in its Series A round of
funding from Greylock Partners, Matrix Partners, and Benchmark Capital. As a
result of the investment, David Arnoff of Greylock and Andy Marcuvitz of
Matrix will join Mazu's board of directors. The company also said that Phil
London, who has served in senior executive positions at Lotus Development
Corp, Trilogy Software and Agillion, has joined Mazu as its new chief
executive officer.
	http://www.mazunetworks.com

	Commerce Software Firm Momenta Gets $5 Million Round One
	?	?	AUSTIN, Texas (VENTUREWIRE) -- Momenta, a software company providing ?collaborative commerce applications and services for electonic marketplaces, ?said it has raised $5 million in its first round of funding. Authosisa, a ?Hong Kong-based venture capital firm, led the round, which also included ?American Pacific Technology Group and several individual Asian and American ?investors. The company said it will use the funds for marketing and product ?development.?	http://www.momenta.com?	?	Mobile Commerce Firm ViaFone Gets $23 Million in Round Two?

	REDWOOD SHORES, Calif. (VENTUREWIRE) -- ViaFone, which enables consumers to
purchase items via the Internet from any wireless device, said it secured $23
million in its second round of funding, led by Redpoint Ventures. RRE
Ventures participated along with previous investors Draper Fisher Jurvetson
and Partech International. The company will use the funds to launch its
OneBridge Mobility Platform internationally. RRE Ventures co-founder and
general partner Jim Robinson III, and Redpoint Ventures partner Peter Gotcher
joined the company's board of directors.
	http://www.viafone.com

	B2B Content Portal Hetairia Gets $250,000 in Additional Seed
	?	?	DALLAS (VENTUREWIRE) -- Hetairia Communications, which is developing a ?business-to-business content portal at www.fastcamel.com, said it has raised ?an additional $250,000 in seed financing from Doug Duncan, a general partner ?at BarleyMills Investment, adding to Mr. Duncan's previous investment of ?$250,000. The company said it will use the funds to form a partnership with ?industry magazines, to make site content available in several languages, and ?to expand customer service and sales. Doug Duncan sits on the board of ?Hetairia Communications along with Michael Cowpland, CEO of Corel, a graphic ?arts and word processing applications firm.   ?	http://www.fastcamel.com?	?	Warner Music Group to Take Stake in Echo Networks?

	SAN FRANCISCO (VENTUREWIRE) -- Echo Networks, which provides interactive
streaming music, said it has entered into an agreement with Warner Music
Group (WMG) that permits Echo to include WMG-controlled recordings in its
community-based streaming music service. As part of the agreement, WMG will
have the right to acquire a small equity stake in Echo, which is backed by
eBay co-founder, Jeff Skoll; former president of Disney's Hollywood Records,
Peter Paterno; and Wish.com CEO Michael Mo. The company has also secured
funding from Revolution Ventures and Fundamental Capital.
	http://www.echo.com

	bad news
	?
	Walker Digital May Have Violated Labor Rules in Layoffs
	?	?	NEW YORK (VENTUREWIRE) -- Walker Digital, the investment and incubation firm ?run by Jay Walker, the founder of priceline.com, may have violated a federal ?law after it laid off about a hundred employees the week of Thanksgiving. ?Since the U.S. Department of Labor enacted the Worker Adjustment and ?Retraining Notification Act (WARN), a company that is laying off more than ?33% of its active work force in a 30-day period must give workers 60 days ?notice. If workers do not get the proper notice, they are entitled to 60 days ?pay and benefits. According to one former Walker Digital employee, all laid ?off employees received one week of health insurance and no severance pay. ?There are several exceptions to the Labor rules, and the Connecticut Attorney ?General is reportedly investigating the situation. Walker Digital ?spokesperson Kevin Goldman would not comment directly on severance offered to ?its former employ! ess. He said on Friday Walker Digital had not been ?contacted by the state attorney general office and would be happy to ?cooperate if contacted.?	http://www.walkerdigital.com?	?	B2B Tech and Support Firm NetSales Cuts 40% of Staff?

	OVERLAND PARK, Kan. (VENTUREWIRE) -- NetSales, which provides industrial
suppliers with technology and support services for online product sales, said
it cut 63 positions in every department, leaving the company with
approximately 100 employees. The company said it is focusing more on supplier
integration and that the layoffs were a result of the company's incorrect
estimation of the number of staff it needed. Over the summer, the company
sold its online software sales division, eliminating 70 jobs, as part of its
shift from a business-to-consumer focus to a business-to-business market.
NetSales received $31.75 million in March from Norwest Equity Partners, Time
Warner, Chase Manhattan, Wells Fargo, Advanta Partners, HarbourVest Partners,
and Kansas City Equity Partners.
	http://www.netsales.com

	Reward Program Stockback.com Lays Off 50% of Staff
	?	?	NEW YORK (VENTUREWIRE) -- Stockback.com, a Web site that rewards consumers ?who use partner sites by putting their money into savings programs such as ?mutual funds, said it laid off almost 50% of its 66-member staff. The company ?said it let go of 29 employees, mostly in the information technology ?division. That division will be restructured to tie technology spending to ?revenue streams. The company also said it will be able to operate without any ?additional money until the first quarter of 2002. Despite the cutbacks, the ?company said it will make "strategic hires." Stockback is funded by RRE ?Ventures, Neo Carta Ventures, and TH Lee.Putnam Internet Partners.?	http://www.stockback.com?	?	new products?	??	Speed Ventures and Sonera Launch Idea Tester BreedLab ?

	AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands (VENTUREWIRE) -- Speed Ventures, an international
venture management company, and Sonera, a Finnish mobile communications and
services and applications provider, said it has formed BreedLab, which will
focus on developing and testing new business ideas. Potential entrepreneurs
joining the BreedLab program will get the services free of charge, but when
the decision is made to start the business, Sonera and Speed Ventures, will
take up a shareholding position in the company.
	http://www.sonera.com/breedlab

	m&a
	?
	Aggregration Firms Yodlee and VerticalOne Merge
	?	?	REDWOOD SHORES, Calif.  (VENTUREWIRE) -- Yodlee, which provides a free, ?Web-based service that enables users to manage and gain access to personal ?account information, said it merged with VerticalOne, a wholly owned ?subsidiary of online financing services firm S1, a publicly traded Internet ?banking firm. Vertical One provides personal account aggregration and ?transaction services. The new company will be run as a stand alone under the ?Yodlee name and S1 will hold a 32% ownership stake. No further financial ?details were disclosed. Anil Arora, president and CEO of Yodlee, will be the ?CEO of the new company and Gregg Freishtat, VerticalOne's founder, chairman ?and CEO, will serve as an advisor to senior management. Yodlee is funded by ?Accel Partners and Sequoia Capital.?	http://www.verticalone.com?	http://www.yodlee.com?	E-Learning Firm Wide Learning Acquires Financial Directions?

	LONDON  (VENTUREWIRE) -- Wide Learning, a suppler of financial Internet
learning services for employees and customers of financial institutions, said
it acquired  Financial Directions (FDI), a supplier of classroom-based
financial training for banks, brokers, and financial institutions. The terms
of the deal were not disclosed. Wide Learning is backed by GE Capital, JP
Morgan, Arts Alliance, and Forman Hardy Holdings.
	http://www.financialdirectionsinc.com
	http://www.widelearning.com

	Procurement Firm Simplexis Acquires Bid Tech Firm NISBIC
	?	?	SAN FRANCISCO (VENTUREWIRE) -- Simplexis, an online educational service ?provider focusing on K-12 schools and their suppliers, said it acquired the ?National Internet School Bid Information Center, a provider of bid technology ?for schools. Financial terms were undisclosed. Simplexis will integrate ?NISBIC's technology into its own product SimpleBuy, an Internet procurement ?technology for schools and school suppliers. Derek MacFarland, NISBIC's ?founder and CEO, will remain with the company as head of the sealed bid ?department. Simplexis is backed by ICG, Kaplan, GE Capital, Commerce One, and ?individual investor Lamar Alexander, former secretary of education.?	http://www.simplexis.com?	?	GeoAccess Acquires Sweetwater Health from Bankrupt Caredata?

	OVERLAND PARK, Kan. (VENTUREWIRE) -- GeoAccess, a developer of an Internet
physician search engine and  managed care software, said it signed an
agreement to acquire Sweetwater Health Enterprises from Caredata.com, which
was recently pulled from the Nasdaq and has filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy,
for an undisclosed amount. GeoAccess will retain some senior managers from
Sweetwater, but has not yet decided about whether it will taken on other
Caredata employees. Sweetwater provides medical credential services,
software, and Internet tools to managed care organizations, hospitals, and
other healthcare entities. GeoAccess will acquire several products and
services including PrimeSource and PrimeSourceWeb physician credential
services. GeoAccess is backed by undisclosed investors including individuals
	http://www.geoaccess.com

	new directors
	?
	Medical App Firm ClinicManager Names New Board Member
	?	?	SOUTHFIELD, Mich. (VENTUREWIRE) -- ClinicManager, an application service ?provider for the medical community, said it has appointed Frank D. Stella to ?its board of directors. Mr. Stella, who will be the sixth member of the ?board, is the founder, chairman, and CEO of F.D. Stella Products. ?ClinicManager, which is currently raising Series B funding, is backed by ?individual investors.  ?	http://www.clinicmanager.com?	?	new people?	??	Workforce ASP Interactive Software Systems Names President?

	FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (VENTUREWIRE) -- Interactive Software Systems (ISS), a
provider of contact center, e-commerce, and enterprise and workforce
management services, said it appointed Howard Glass as president. Mr. Glass
has been acting president of the organization since June of this year. Prior
to joining the company, he served as president of IRT, a contact center and
CRM outsourcing provider and parent company of ISS. ISS is backed by IRT and
individual investors.
	http://www.intersoftsys.com

	vw corrections
	?
	Allegis Capital
	?	?	NEW YORK (VENTUREWIRE) -- An item in yesterday's Venture Wire listed an ?incorrect URL for Allegis Capital. The correct URL is ?http://www.allegiscapital.com.?	?	Internet Publishing Group?

	NEW YORK (VENTUREWIRE) -- An item in yesterday's VentureWire incorrectly
stated the name of the company's new board member. His correct name is Rob
McCord and he will be the fifth board member, not the sixth.

	company index
	?	?	@Stake, BreedLab, ClinicManager, Datek Online Holdings, Echo Networks, ?FastCamel.com, Financial Directions, GeoAccess, iChoose, Interactive Software ?Systems, Mazu Networks, Momenta Inc., NetSales, Quova, Simplexis, Stockback, ?VerticalOne, ViaFone, Walker Digital, Wide Learning, Yodlee.com?	?	?	?	Where will you find the world's leaders in the optical?	communications industry discussing the latest trends,?	developments, and future direction of the field??	Optix2001 Feb 11-14 in Pasadena CA.?	?	Be on the cutting edge of optical communications technology?	with industry experts and scholars such as Joe Bass, VP and?	GM of the Wavelength Routing Business Unit at Cisco Systems,?	and John E. Bowers, Professor and Director of the?	Multidisciplinary Optical Switching Technology Center at?	UC Santa Barbara.?	?	Also participating are CEOs from the top 48 optical?	communications organizations, providing attendees with an?	unparalleled inside look at the companies and players in?	this dynamic field.?	?	Participation at this event is subject to approval and is?	limited to senior executives involved in the optical?	communications industry. For your registration pack link ?to:http://www.optix2001.com/?	?	?	investor index?

	American Pacific Technology Group, Authosisa, Benchmark Capital, Draper
Fisher Jurvetson, Greylock Management, Matrix Partners, Partech
International, Redpoint Ventures, RRE Ventures, Warner Music Group

	Encourage your friends and colleagues to subscribe to VentureWire at
http://venturewire.net/register.asp

	Send news items to editor@venturewire.com

	Send questions, complaints, or service queries to venturewire@venturewire.com

	To change your e-mail address visit our account administration page at
http://venturewire.net

	To unsubscribe send e-mail to listoff@venturewire.com

	This newsletter was mailed to you at:  jdasovic@ENRON.COM

	This copy of VentureWire may be distributed freely, provided that the
distribution is without charge, that the issue is distributed complete and
unaltered, and that all copies retain the Technologic copyright notice.  This
copy of VentureWire and the information within it, however, may not be
reproduced, saved, or otherwise copied into a database without the prior
written consent of Technologic Partners.

	VentureWire is a service mark of Technologic Partners
	, 2000 Technologic Partners
		?


Mike,
 We are working on revising the draft email to the CPUC and need some
additional information from you.  First, would it be accurate to say that
Enron Energy Marketing Corporation and Enron Energy Services Operations Inc.
do not have responsive documents to the subpoenas and that any information
would reside at ESS?  In other words, we do not have documents to produce
from those two entities.  If that is not correct, how would we describe what
documents these entities have/what will we produce?
 To the extent that ESS is evaluating whether it will provide
electronic data (less the customer specific information), we also need to
know how that process is going, whether the data will be similar to what
EMPI is working on, and whether an October 27, 2000 production date is
realistic.

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Ken Lay will be out of town.

Jeffrey McClellan@ECT
05/15/2000 05:31 PM
To: Mark Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dian Chu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristina H
Brosig/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brooklyn Couch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valeria A Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Francis Calub/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracey Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracey
Florio-Kozadinos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandra
Lighthill/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky
Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shannon Carmichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elyse
Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maribel Mata/Corp/Enron@Enron, Merlyn
Fance/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yannis
Tzamouranis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Tipton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Estalee Hickman/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, nbrines@uh.edu
Subject: 5/17 Board Meeting Agenda

Hello to all,
Attached please find the agenda for Wednesday's board meeting.  Please review
it and come to the meeting with ideas and suggestions.  If you have not done
so already, please let me know if you will be there.  Again, the meeting is
Wednesday, 5/17/00 at 1:30 in EB49C4.  We have scheduled the room until 3:00
but I will aim to have you out of there in an hour.

See you there,
Jeff


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042912.txt is empty.


Cynthia, et al --

FYI.  I was on a panel with Phil Moeller today in Las Vegas (he was the
moderator).  Very nice guy.  No real issues developed.  I used (very
liberally) Steve Kean's testimony in San Diego to talk about California and
some material on RTOs.  My speech is attached below.

Phil indicated that he thought that there was agreement on the Public Power
Tax issues and on NAERO language.  He highlighted that comprehensive language
could be difficult if not impossible next year.  (Joe - can you please send
me a copy of the NAERO bill and any summaries).

While Phil seemed to have a great sense of what is happening in California
and the electricity markets, he indicated that many of his staff collegues
were not so up to speed.  Any way that we can help them out before their
minds are made up?

Jim


FYI.  Wanted to forward what I'm getting from legal on the TGLO contract-
clear as mud.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000 06:55
AM ---------------------------
From: Gerald Nemec on 12/19/2000 06:17 PM
To: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Texas General Land Office IT Transport

Lauri,   From a legal standpoint, we can cut the nomination on an
interruptible agreement at our discretion.  The contract clearly gives us
this right.  I haven't specifically reviewed the contract, but I am assuming
it is our standard form.  I will check this.

Yes, I would consider HISD facilities to be state facilities.  The fact that
this goes to Entex first complicates the issue.

Dan,  was the intent that it be directly delivered to state facilities, or if
it ultimately ended up at state facilities?

	Lauri A Allen
	12/19/2000 10:57 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Texas General Land Office IT Transport

I haven't heard anything back from you guys on this.  Any insight?  I know
Linda Roberts is also working a deal with TGLO to convert bbls to mmbtus
which could mean incremental volumes that TGLO would be trying to get into
Midcon.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 09:37
AM ---------------------------
From: Gerald Nemec on 12/05/2000 04:12 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Texas General Land Office IT Transport

Dan,  Any input you have on this contract would be appreciated.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 04:11 PM -----

	Lauri A Allen
	12/05/2000 02:53 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward.D.Gottlob@enron.com
		 Subject: Texas General Land Office IT Transport

Gerald/Eric-

I have a couple of questions regarding TGLO transport contract
012-88494-202.  We are currently delivering a volume of 28.000mm into various
Midcon interconnects on this contract that are designated to go to
Reliant/Entex for the purpose of heating HISD schools.  The transport
contract stipulates different rates for this delivery depending on whether
the gas is intended for state facilities or not.  My first question, then,
is:  are HISD schools considered state facilities?  And, if HISD schools are
considered state facilities, does the fact that this gas is being delivered
to them via Reliant/Entex utilizing Midcon's pipe make any difference?

I am asking these questions not only to assure that we are recouping the
correct transport rate, but also to determine what the consequences might be
if I interrupt this delivery.  We are having difficulty getting enough gas
into Midcon to cover our Entex noms and I am just exploring my options.  I
would also expect that this volume should decrease when HISD closes for the
Christmas holidays- does the fact that this is an IT agreement give me enough
leverage to cut this nom if TGLO does not do so voluntarily?

Thanks for your help.


Thanks,  I will look over their remarks and get back with you.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Jeff,

You might want to keep this in mind when you're up at the Dome after X-mas.
Go on over to Anchor Bay on Tuesday and check out how big it is. The surf's
coming in! Now all I have to do is find out what San Diego will be like. So
far, they're predicting 7"+. Not as big as up here, but fun nevertheless,
and a lot better than getting hit on by daughter Hopkins.

LATE!

>From: Kent Deverell <deverell@fluid.com>
>To: Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>
>Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Big, Bad Surf Moving]]
>Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:28:22 -0800
>
>Check this shit out. It's going to be macking.
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: [Fwd: Big, Bad Surf Moving]
>Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:06:35 -0800
>From: Jon Wyman <jon@fluid.com>
>Organization: Fluid Inc
>To: Kent Deverell <kdeverell@fluid.com>
>
>Feeling lucky? I think I'm going to hit Lindemar or the HMB Jetty
>Saturday a.m. if you're interested.
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: Big, Bad Surf Moving
>    Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:16:20 -0800
>    From: Sean Gibson <SGibson@blancandotus.com>
>      To: "Carlos Flores (E-mail)" <carlos@surfree.com>,"Jonathan Wyman
>          (E-mail)" <jwyman@fluid.com>,"Glenn Kohner
>          (E-mail)"<gskohner@iso-online.com>,"Auran Piatigorsky
>          (E-mail)"<auran@surfree.com>,"Daniel Donahoe (E-mail)"
>          <djdiv@surfree.com>,"Peter Macey (E-mail)"
>          <peter@surfree.com>,"Will Hartley
>          (E-mail)"<wmhartley@hotmail.com>
>
>
>
>
>Time to buy a gun...
>
>                    Northern California Surf Forecast
>
>                            Effective 12/20/00
>
>            HIGH SURF ADVISORY FOR ALL OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
>
>        I hope you like big surf, 'cause we have plenty moving in!
>
>As the writing of this forecast 8:00 AM Wednesday, the NW buoy in Hawaii
>is already showing 15' @17 seconds. The first signs of our newest series
>   of mega swells moving into our coastline. Those of you that have been
>   paying attention know that these swells take about 3 days to hit our
>                     coast fromthe Hawaiian Islands.
>
>   All models are in agreement with open ocean swell heights of between
>  30-40' even after they leave the Hawaiian chain. There are three major
>  swells tracking across the Pacific. The first will begin to show on our
>   coast mid day on Friday, with most beaches seeing long period surf at
>the NW facing beaches in the 15'+ range, with bigger sets possible. Deep
>  water spots coupled with the long swell period (up to 20+ seconds) will
>   see double that size at least. The meat of the first system will hit
>    more towards Crescent City, with plenty of energy left for northern
>  California. The swell direction looks excellent at 280-295 degrees. It
>      will become steeper as the swell tracks to the east on Sunday.
>
>   Look for this first system to provide huge surf all day on Saturday,
>with still solid surf on Sunday, though backing down through the day. By
>   late Sunday, a second solid swell will move in with surf heights not
>      quite as big as the first one, but still in the 10-12' range is
>  expected. Look for continued solid surf through Monday, lingering into
>  Tuesday. Then....are you ready for this????? Yet another macker is due
>   on Tuesday with surf heights again reaching the solid double overhead
>  range, however, this one is still a ways off, but the charts show some
>                 impressive size and long swell periods.
>
>So, to summarize...IT"S GONNA BE BIG!!! Big guns only. Use your big wave
>                                   wax!
>
>         Know your limits. No shame staying on shore. Surf safe!!
>
>                               Cyber Kahuna

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


(See attached file: WTX0811.xls)

 - WTX0811.xls


Robert:

I have updated the info at Enron Methanol per gas control's volumes (via
meter overrides).  I did not realize that's what you wanted when you handed
me the "sticky" on Monday.....  I thought you were just being informative.

Sorry about the confusion.

Charlotte Hawkins

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           04/04/2000 03:23 PM

To: Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Methanol ; Meter #: 988291

 This is a follow up to the note I gave you on Monday, 4/3/00 { preliminary
flow data provided by Daren}.

 Please override POP'S  daily volume{ presently zero}  to reflect  daily
activity you can obtain from Gas Control.

 This change is needed  ASAP for economics purposes.


If you have not already turned in your United Way pledge card or pledged on
line at http://unitedway.enron.com, please do so today.  This is the last day
to make a pledge and your contribution will be very much appreciated.

Thank you,

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3835
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000
01:32 PM ---------------------------

Jim Little
11/14/2000 10:25 AM
To: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy De La Torre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory A Mausser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Delma Salazar/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Hungerford/NA/Enron@ENRON, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 0900 OA as of October GL; September Liquidation Detail


Harlan E. Murphy
Enron Wholesale Services - Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3811
Houston, Texas 77002
Tel: 713.345.2679
Fax: 713.646.3490
E-mail: Harlan.Murphy@Enron.com


Here is the information we looked at on Thursday .  It is updated for our
current position.  Through looking at this you will see that our risk is to a
significant up move in prices.  Currently, prices are not moving up
significantly.

Thanks,

Errol
---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 02/26/2001
08:51 AM ---------------------------

"Hood, Stephen (NY Int)" <SHOOD@edfman.com> on 02/26/2001 08:16:32 AM
To: "'errol.mclaughlin@enron.com'" <errol.mclaughlin@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Enron pos.

> If you have any questions, feel free to respond.
>
>  <<Enron NG.pdf>>
>
> Regards,
>
> SMH

 - Enron NG.pdf


thanks


Laura:
Attached are the letters that I referenced in the previous email.  The
letters:

oppose SBX33--Burton (state takeover of the private electric utilities'
transmission lines)
oppose  SBX6--Burton (state takes significant position in generation, gas &
electric transmission, energy conservation, renewable resources, real-time
meters
support SBX5--Sher (increase funding for energy efficiency)

Again, if you have any questions don't hesitate to contact me at 415.782.7822.

Best,
Jeff

 - sbx 33 oppose letter revised.doc
 - sbx5 support letter.doc
 - sbx 6 oppose letter


As described in my August 22 e-mail, FERC has issued a NOPR proposing revised public utility filing requirements.  A copy of my Aug. 22 summary is attached for your reference.  I've discussed this with Elizabeth Sager and Harlan Murphy in ENA Legal, and the following is a very brief summary of aspects of the NOPR that we think Enron should consider opposing.  Comments are due Oct. 5.

If approved, FERC's proposed revisions would affect Enron by requiring electronic posting of certain transactional data by power marketers and entities selling at wholesale pursuant to market-based rate authority.

Currently, EPMI (and gencos with market-based rate authority) must file the following information quarterly:

	- identification of the buyer/seller;
	- description of the service, (e.g., purchase/sale, firm/non-firm);
	- delivery point(s);
	- price(s) (price per transaction rather than price ranges)
	- quantities, (e.g., MWh/MW); and
	- dates/duration of service (e.g., daily, monthly, hourly, etc.)
Such information is supposed to be reported on a transaction by transaction (rather than aggregated) basis.  The quarterly filings are paper filings and are not granted confidential treatment.
The quarterly filing requirements proposed in the NOPR differ in that they would, 1) in addition to all of the above information, also require posting of the transaction execution date and the point of receipt; 2) require electronic posting of an Index of Customers rather than paper filing and 3) require reporting for all sales transactions including book outs or net outs.  Enron should consider objecting to these revisions.  I've spoken with some of the traders and they agree.  The effect of these requirements would be that Enron's competitors will now have quicker, easier access to not only the usual reported information but also to the transaction execution date which will disclose a place and time for the transaction.  FERC has cited very little valid justification for imposing these new requirements.
ENA Legal representatives and I will be participating in the EPSA conference call to discuss the NOPR on Friday.  I would like to have a consensus on Enron's general position by then.  I do not know whether we will be joining EPSA's comments or filing on our own.  Please let me know your thoughts and call me if you would like to discuss.  Also, if you don't already have information on the EPSA conference call and want to participate, let me know and I can provide you with the call-in number and agenda.
SSL


2 missing deals for mike

sell dynegy
cal 04
59.00
25 mw
sp15
off peak

sell dynegy
cal 04
45.00
25 mw
sp15
off peak


Maureen,

OK. Pease, set up a meeting.

VInce

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Raymond, Maureen
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 1:17 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	Koepke, Gwyn
Subject:	FW: Revised Argentine and Brazilian Presentation

Vince,

Michael G. will be in town next week. We can discuss further coverage of Latin America then.

Maureen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Guerriero, Michael
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 12:38 PM
To:	Raymond, Maureen
Subject:	RE: Revised Argentine and Brazilian Presentation

yes. Management just went through 2 days of pessimism. I think we need to talk with them and agree upon how they need to be supported and what information they will want from your team.

MFG

From:	Maureen Raymond/Enron@enronxgate on 08/31/2001 12:12 PM CDT
To:	Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Vince J Kaminski/ENRON@enronXgate, Gwyn Koepke/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: Revised Argentine and Brazilian Presentation

Michael,

We would be happy to put them on our mailing list of the GMM and send them the final electronic version of the presentation with the scenarios.  Due to the critical nature of Argentina we are monitoring it on a weekly basis in the GMM.  Do you think it would be useful to provide regional updates on some regular basis, eg.on a quarterly basis or more frequently for Argentina.

Maureen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Guerriero, Michael
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 6:38 AM
To:	Raymond, Maureen
Subject:	Re: Revised Argentine and Brazilian Presentation

We will be handing this draft out today.

We met with Goldman and Citibank yesterday and have reviewed the regions macro econ status.

We need to get you more active in our activity. I do not think everyone knows your team exists. Put John Lavoratto, louise kitchens and Jim Hughes, stan horton  on you e mail list at least. I would reccomend you set a meeting up with them directly to let them know what your team is doing. I will talk to them again today.

I am in Houston next week. I will stop by.

Good work everyone who saw the first draft was surprised we had this in house expertice.

MFG

From:	Maureen Raymond/Enron@enronxgate on 08/30/2001 05:52 PM CDT
To:	Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Vince J Kaminski/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	Revised Argentine and Brazilian Presentation

Michael and Orlando,

Attached is the revised version of the presentation, we have added the scenario analysis at your request.  Please let me know if there is any other way in which we may be helpful.

Thanks,

Maureen

 << File: Argy Brazil Presentation revised 29Aug01.ppt >>


Lawyers working through some last minute glitches; We think we have a workable solution with Dyn and the lenders; Plan is to go to B&P around 7 to start the signing process.  Funding still tomorrow midday.
K.


Start Date: 3/30/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001033018.txt


The Government of Alberta Power Purchase Arrangement Auction of the regulated
generation Plants and Units commenced Wednesday, August 2nd, and will
continue through a number of rounds over a number of days and possibly
weeks.  Enron Canada Power Corp. (ECPC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Enron
Canada Corp., is an Invited Bidder participating in the Auction.  For
strategic corporate purposes and as a result of restrictions imposed under
the Auction Participation Agreement and the Auction Rules (compliance with
which is secured by a US$27MM Bid Deposit), any information, details or
speculation regarding ECPC's involvement in the Auction, including whether
ECPC is participating or continuing to participate in the Auction or has
withdrawn from the Auction at any time, the Plants or Units ECPC is or is not
bidding on, the amounts ECPC is bidding or is approved for bidding, and any
other information whatsoever about the Auction process is to be kept strictly
confidential.  In particular, the Auction has been followed closely by the
media and may be of interest to shareholders, investors and other
constituents, and such communications are prohibited until after the Auction
has been completed and the Winning Bidders have been announced by the
Government of Alberta.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Peter Keohane, Enron
Canada Corp., at 403-974-6923 or Peter.Keohane@enron.com.


Lindy, your example is correct for settling operator imbalances.  If we have
a payable operator imbalance
and we settle volumetrically, then we get fuel and transport.  But, I thought
the "netting and trading" in Order 637
was on Shipper imbalances only.  I am not sure what we mean by "no additional
cost, etc" mentioned below.
I'll call you in the morning (Thursday) to discuss further,  since I am not
familiar with the PNM protest.  Thanks. Lynn

Lindy Donoho
12/06/2000 11:19 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW

I think the example of when quantities may be subject to transportation and
fuel is when an Operator overpulls at a delivery point and then cashes out
the imbalance, TW could be out the transport and fuel.  For example,

  DP is SoCal/Needles: scheduled volume is 700,000/d
     actual volume delivered is 720,000/d
     imbalance is 20,000/d, SoCal owes TW
     TW collects transport & fuel on 700,000/d (bill on scheduled volume)
     SoCal cuts a check to TW for dollar value of 20,000/d
     TW doesn't collect transport & fuel on 20,000/d
  Payback in-kind doesn't have this problem:
     The 20,000/d transport gets scheduled at Needles, TW collects the
transport & fuel      (bill on scheduled volume), but we physically give
SoCal 20,000/d less on that day

Is this the correct example?  I'm copying Lynn Blair to verify.

Susan Scott
12/06/2000 09:20 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW

We did not answer protests to our Order 637 filing.

The gist of PNM's protest in RP00-626 is that we shouldn't be able to charge
a transport or fuel fee for our imbalance netting and trading service.  I
agree with PNM that our tariff language is vague in this regard.  What
exactly do we mean by "no additional cost...unless through the allocation
process, quantities may be subject to transportation and fuel"??   Can
someone help me with this?

Since we really did not want to make this compliance filing anyway, I would
say we probably wouldn't mind if FERC rejected our tariff sheet outright.
However, it's more likely that they will just instruct us to clarify our
language.  Or they could tell us to remove the "subject to transportation and
fuel" provision.  If we want to preserve our right to charge transport and
fuel, it might be worthwhile filing something in the way of an answer.
However, I am going to need some assistance in understanding what the
language means and why we think we can do it, so I can justify it to FERC.
Any comments you have in this regard would be appreicated.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/05/2000 05:18 PM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW

Should we respond to PNM's protest of the dollar valuation of imbalances
prior to netting and trading?  Did we already respond to this issue when they
filed their protest of the 637 filing?  DF