This request has been pending your approval for  142 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000041547&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000041547
Request Create Date : 6/19/01 7:50:30 AM
Requested For       : jaime.gualy@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\nahoutrd\houston\pwr\common\power2\Region - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


Please, read.

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
05:34 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Enron Human Resources @ ENRON                           09/26/2000
08:18 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Houston
cc:
Subject: Important Information About United HealthCare - Please Read!

TO: Houston Area Employees Participating in the Domestic Medical Plan Benefits

You may have recently received communication from United HealthCare (UHC)
concerning Memorial Hermann Health Systems' (MHHS) decision to terminate
their contract with UHC  in the Houston/Beaumont area.  This communication
also included the names of physicians who will be dropped from the network
due to this action.  It is our intent to help you understand the situation.

It is our understanding that Memorial Herman Health Systems asked for a 40%
increase in fees - a substantial increase that would have been passed on to
you and Enron!  When United HealthCare attempted to negotiate with a counter
proposal, Memorial Hermann cancelled their contract.

While this contractual arrangement was between the hospital system and UHC,
Enron continues to support UHC in their ongoing contract negotiation
efforts.  At this time, it is only UHC which has been affected, however, it
is our understanding that Cigna has also been contacted by the hospital group
and may be in contract negotiations at this time as well.

Many doctors have obtained admission privileges to other area hospitals
within the UHC Network or have contracted directly with UHC including those
with admission privileges to The Woodlands, Sugarland and Clear Lake
Hospitals, to name a few.  In a further effort to limit disruption to our
affected employees and families who are enrolled in the UHC Network or EPO
options, Enron has authorized UHC to process claims incurred between
September 28 and December 31, 2000 as if the termination of the Memorial
Hermann Health Systems from the network had not occurred and In-Network
benefits applied.  Office visits will have a $10 copayment and all other
charges will be covered at 90%.  Hospital admissions will still need to be
pre-certified with UHC.

These steps have decreased the number of participants' affected by Primary
Care Physician disruption from 1,050 to 127.

If You Need Medical Attention:  You or your doctor/hospital must call UHC's
customer service number so proper benefits can be verified.  In some cases
the hospital or doctor may request payment at the time service is performed.
If this should happen, please obtain an itemized statement and submit it to
UHC with a claim form for prompt reimbursement.  Claim forms can be obtained
by calling 1-800-332-7979 or in Houston at 713-853-7979 ( press 1).

Open enrollment materials will be coming soon.  Take this opportunity to
consider your elections for 2001.

United HealthCare and Enron HR are committed to assisting Enron employees
through this transition.  We will communicate any  further developments that
may impact you or your family.


Give Us Your Feeback and
	You Could Win Cool Cash

At Enron Federal Credit Union, we are continually looking for ways to
improve, and bring you the products and services that help simplify your
life, like on-line banking and e-Statements.  To ensure we continue to offer
you the newest and most innovative financial products on the market, please
take 2 minutes to answer this short survey found at the following address:

   http://home.enron.com/efcu/survey

When we have received your completed survey, your name will be automatically
entered into a drawing to win $200 cash if you are a member, or $100 cash if
you are not a member.  Deadline for entries is Wednesday, July 26, 2000.
Your responses will be sent in confidence directly to me.  We appreciate your
time and your opinions.

Jack McAdoo
President and CEO
Enron Federal Credit Union


Scott/Stephen, I'm trying to summarize the essence of these performance
guarantees, similiar to what I have for heat rate.  I'm sure I've got
something on output and probably reliability, but can you give me a thumb
nail sketch of what we are looking for on the rest?

10.3.1   Heat Rate Guarantee.  Seller guarantees that the Heat Rate as
measured for each of the Units
as demonstrated during the Performance Test, shall be __BTU/kWh. In the event
the Heat Rate exceeds the Minimum Heat Rate Guarantee, Seller shall take all
necessary actions to correct, retest the deficient Unit and cause the
deficient Unit to meet the Minimum Heat Rate Guarantee.  Failure to meet the
Heat Rate Guarantee shall prevent Acceptance, unless Purchaser explicitly
waives this guarantee in writing.

{we have a definition of heat rate}

10.3.2   Electrical Output Guarantee.

10.3.3   Emissions Guarantee.

10.3.4   Water Consumption Guarantee.

10.3.5 Sound Guarantee.

10.3.6 Reliability.

Thanks,

Kay


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=09/24/2001>, published as of 09/24/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


<http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/x_e.asp?r=01T3HEADREG&g=gift/thanks_gift.asp>	  <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/x_e.asp?r=01T3HEADREG&g=gift/thanks_gift.asp>
 <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T31401REG/1401>
Autumn Celebration CenterpieceTM  <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T31401REG/1401>
Dear Richard,
Thanksgiving is three days away, and there's still time to add a dash of flavor to the celebration! Visit our Thanksgiving Collection <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/collection.pl/01T3BOD1REG/17/0/0/0/0/0> and find gifts to say thanks including the freshest flowers, arrangements, gourmet goodies, sweet treats and unique gifts. Saying thanks with the perfect gift has never been easier, and with the convenience of 24 hour a day access to 1-800-FLOWERS.COM
 on the web and by phone, it makes the last minute the perfect time to shop!

Happy Thanksgiving!

From your friends at 1-800-FLOWERS.COM

Call 1-800-FLOWERS
 (1-800-356-9377), Click (www.1800flowers.com) or Come in!
AOL Keyword: 1800flowers

Offer valid through 11/23/01.

This email was sent to rshapiro@enron.com

 <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T31882REG/1882>
 <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T31812REG/1812>
 <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T35335REG/5335>
 <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T34983REG/4983>

Fresh FlowerCornucopia <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T31882REG/1882>	 Fields of Europe? <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T31812REG/1812>
Harvest CheesecakeSampler <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T35335REG/5335>
Gourmet Basket forThanksgiving <http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/01T34983REG/4983>
  _____

Register Now <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/myshop/register.asp>	 |	 Personalized Greetings <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/greetings/index.asp>	 |	 Gift Certificates <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/jump/gift_cert.asp>	 |	 Member Benefits <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/online_welcome.asp>
Remove Me <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/service/cutoff.asp?id=94>	 |	 Contact Us <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/service/contact.asp>	 |	 Security & Privacy <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/security/index.asp>	 |	 Disclaimer* <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/service/cutoff.asp?id=94>	 |	 Store Locator <http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/stores/locator.asp>

  <http://www.s2u2.com/email_type.asp?email_id=1995943&email_type=3>


not going - jar


Herewith a few ideas for the October meeting in London, some of them
after checking with Paul Portney and with Pankaj. I offer these very, very
preliminary thoughts just to start you thinking - do you want your UK
colleagues on the program; do we want some ancillary events? After getting
your views on questions such as these, I can make more definite suggestions.
I certainly think that we should convene a few hours before the opening
dinner so that the advisors can have a tour of the building and the
facilities. Also, I am hoping that Steve will leave some time on this trip
for a tour of the new BA headquarters - very innovative.
We should consider doing something on the global warming question from the
viewpoint of the Europeans. Start with three recommendations on the political
side that Paul received from David Victor of the Council on Foreign Relations
(characterized as "a VERY smart guy on climate"):
Tony Brenton (Deputy chief of mission, UK embassy in DC.  Has been on UK
climate delegations for a decade; smart and lively; pragmatic; insightful).
Bo Kjellen (Swedish head of delegation; knows European politics inside out;
big figure in Europe).
Tubiana, Laurence (Conseil d'Analyse Economique, France; knows the issue and
can speak to French position, but may not have the gravitas of Kjellen or
Brenton).
Among other ideas (I have winnowed out several) is a guy named Liam
Salter at Climate Network Europe. Brussels based, but relatively junior. Paul
also recommends a woman by the name of Laurence Tubiana, an economist in the
French government's equivalent of the CEA; she has a reputation as a good
presenter and a good economist.
WOULD YOU PLEASE CHECK THESE FOLKS OUT WITH YOUR LONDON PEOPLE, AND GET
ADDITIONAL NAMES FROM THEM. THE GOAL IS TO GIVE ALL OF US A PERSPECTIVE ON
THE EUROPEAN VIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES - UNLESS YOU THINK THAT NOT A
USEFUL TOPIC.
I turn now to Pankaj's suggestion, which I transmit verbatim: "I remember
promising to scout around and see if there were a European whom it would be
interesting to invite to talk to the Enron International Advisory Council
about the (non) convergence of governance structures in Europe, particularly
on the Continent, to the U.S. model.  I got the following names from Jay
Lorsch (apparently all members of the committee steering a multifaculty
Harvard business School project on governance in comparative perspective) as
possibilities.  Jay suggested that Sihler would be best (former CEO of
Henkel, very senior),  Peter's second best (apparently, chairman of Amsterdam
Stock Exchange now) and Smith - formerly Managing partner at Price Waterhouse
Coopers - would be the most junior of the three.  I don't personally know any
of the three."
Now some ideas of my own, again acting on the assumption that we want a
two-way educational dialogue - to give your folks in London and Europe a
run-down on the situation in the US, and the US contingent a better
understanding of how European policymakers view the issues we all face.
1.Bill Kristol on the US political scene, in which there is great
interest here, and great misunderstanding of the Bush administration. We
might also consider inviting Larry Lindsey or some other Bush person if
allowed to do so.
2. Someone on the European view on global warming (see suggestions above).
3. Energy regulation in the UK. Callum McCarthy.
4. Economic outlook. Gavyn Davies (usual talk).
5. What went wrong in California (great interest in that over here) and
how to fix it. Steve could do this, or you could invite Bill Hogan (just
joking) or the chairman of FERC if we are allowed to pay his way.
6. Motivating people in a multinational, multicultural organization. If
this is of interest, I can get recommendations for speakers.
7. I would be inclined to add a high-level speaker on the state of
US-UK-European relations, perhaps as a dinner speaker. Between Gavyn and me,
we might be able to get Chancellor Gordon Brown, a very interesting guy, and
the inventor of the "climate change levy" that is driving industry in this
country nuts.
Please look this over. Steve and I have to get together, preferably with
Ken, which leads me to suggest Aspen during the Institute's energy forum,
which I understand Ken will be attending. But if that is not feasible, Steve
and I can work out a date for a preliminary meeting, followed up by one with
Ken at his convenience.
END


Asa & Joy,

I just wanted to take a minute and thank the two of you for your generosity
this past week.  My friends and I had a terrific time and everyone really
enjoyed your condo.  The weather was terrific and the fish put up a
formidable challenge.  We are very interested in renting the condo from you
guys during the season this year.  I requested that the cleaning charges this
time be put on my credit card.  Please let me know if  they charge you guys
anything.  Thanks again.  We look forward to seeing you guys soon.
Phillip


George,
Per Jennifer Medcalf's request, I am forwarding you the Enron organization
and product/service charts.

Colleen Koenig
Analyst
Global Strategic Sourcing
713.345.5326


On October 15, 2001, the Midwest ISO filed an amendment to
Section 17.5 of its Open Access Transmission Tariff to charge
a fee for non-confirmed transmission service requests for
transmission service greater than one week. Midwest ISO
has requested an effective date December 15, 2001.
Interventions and protests are due November 5.

Let me know if you need further information.

Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596


Thanks.  See you on Thursday.

Susan

KKW816@aol.com on 04/02/2001 12:03:02 PM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Soccer

We have a shirt and we really want her to be a part of the team- I know that
the format -- with practices with 2 teams combined with Spring Break and bad
weather have made it a little difficult to have the same feeling that we all
did with our little micro teams but I know she would like the other girls on
the team and have fun! I'll make sure Roy brings her shirt to practice on
Thursday. Thanks for letting me know about this and we''ll work together to
amok this fun for her! Kathy


6:30 tonight is great.  see you later....any ideas?

geresj@tdusa.com on 12/15/2000 01:31:30 PM
To: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: December 17 - 20

Re: your voice-mail, let's move the dinner to Monday the 18th at 6:30 p.m. (or
later if that is more convenient).

JRG

12/13/2000 08:34 AM
John Geresi
John Geresi
John Geresi
12/13/2000 08:34 AM
12/13/2000 08:34 AM

To:   Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: December 17 - 20  (Document link not converted)

Jeff -

Let's do dinner on the 17th.   I'd be happy to stop by your house for a quick
drink and tour.  I will assume 6:30 p.m. works unless I hear that this does
not
work for you. I look forward to seeing you on Sunday.

JRG

Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com on 12/13/2000 08:24:33 AM

To:   John Geresi/CIBG/TDBANK/US@TDBANK-US
cc:
Subject:  Re: December 17 - 20

Yes, Love to have dinner, either the 17th or 18th--you pick.  Let's have a
drink at my house first so I can show you the digs.  Sorry I couldn't make
it...last minute schedule problems...

Jeff

geresj@tdusa.com on 12/12/2000 04:02:50 PM

To:   Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  December 17 - 20

Jeff -

Jean and the boys will be heading to my parents for X-Mas on 12/17.  I am
in
Houston until the morning of the 21st, and would love to get together for
dinner
sometime during that interval.

Are you scheduled to be in town during that period?  If so give me a call
at
713.653.8207 (day) or at home at 713.522.9381.  I'll also be happy fill you
in
on what happened at the MFAH subcomittee meeting today as well.

JRG


please match deal 204787 with 204788


Gerald--

As we briefly discussed, I have been assigned the task of negotiating a
gathering agreement with Wildhorse Energy related to an Enron Capital
Resources  project (...I think that is the Finance group's new name).

I hope to have the first draft from Wildhorse tomorrow.  If so, I'll give you
a copy in person and follow-up via e-mail.

Here are some of the challenges (in my opinion):

-- The finance group (Scott Josey) has established a deadline of June 30 (for
reasons we can discuss later); Kinder-Morgan and Tom Brown (Wildhorse) have
already proven to be a very slow movers.

-- Wildhorse utilizes the same law firm as ThunderCreek, so the "standard"
gathering agreement may include some goofy language thereby delaying turn(s)
of the documents.

-- Short deadline decreases my leverage (actually, I'm getting levered) and
therefore my ability to negotiate what I consider to be a "good" deal.

Okay, we're crossing over to my own psychological/PRC issues...anyway, I'll
contact you ASAP upon receipt of contract drafts to discuss the deal in
detail as well as a strategy going forward.

Thanks (in advance) for the assistance.

Dan


Janice --

Thanks for the follow up.  I'll coordinate with Sara and/or Carol and Kim
from her and let you know how we resolve this one.

Leslie

	Janice R Moore
	07/06/2000 08:49 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Southern Company confirms

Kim and I discussed -- she wants guidance from legal.  The process Southern
is advocating will not save her any time or paper, but she's not going to
stand in front of a moving train if this is what Enron wants to do and if
legal OKs it.  Then Sara Shackleton was working w/ the financial confirm desk
(can't recall his name) and I have not been able to speak w/ Sara -- just
voicemails so far.  I'd be happy for you to take this back if you'd like to
work on it as an infrastructure project.  Perhaps we could let Sara know w/
whom she should coordinate on the physical/legal support team and we can
resolve this for Kim.
Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)

	Leslie Hansen
	03/07/2000 11:06

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Southern Company confirms

Janice:

Did you ever discuss the Southern Company confirms with Kim Theriot?  Let's
touch base on Wednesday to discuss.  (I have a 9-10 am meeting and a doctor's
appt at 3 pm, but I'm available any time in between).

Hope you had a great long weekend!

Leslie


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Black/HOU/EES on 05/31/2001 02:32 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services  From:  Scott Mills                           05/30/2001 10:00 PM

To:	Chris Leonard/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Jackson/HOU/EES@EES, Warren Prihoda/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Kenneth Lee/HOU/EES@EES, Wade Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/EES@EES, Angela Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Rogers Herndon/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject:	Power Mid to Offer Reserve (effective 05.30.01)

Starting immediately, the value between mid and offer on all power deals done between EES and the third party will be held in reserve.  A report will be generated by counterparty/deal that will support the value of the reserve (this report will be similar in format to the origination report).  An assessment as to the need for the reserve beyond the 2nd quarter will be made in the next couple of weeks.  In the meantime, the only value that will flow through the DPR will be the MTM value of deals done with EPMI and the curve shift associated with the power positions.  Any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

SRM (x33548)


Post Date: November 27, 2000
Category: SHORT-TERM FIRM CAPACITY
Subcategory: NWP OFFERS
Subject: 01-174 Soliciting Electronic Bids

Notice Text:

All Shippers Notification: 01-174?????? ??????? ??????? Dated November 27,
2000

TO:???? ??????? ALL SHIPPERS

FROM:?? Candace C. Karpakis- (801) 584-6996 wk
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? (801) 971-5983
cellular
?????????????????????? Williams Gas Pipeline-West
?????????????????????? Northwest Pipeline Transportation

SUBJECT:??????? SOLICITING ELECTRONIC BIDS FOR
?????????????????????? AVAILABLE FIRM MAINLINE TRANSPORTATION
?????????????????????? CAPACITY ON NORTHWEST'S TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
Northwest has posted the following package of available firm TF-1 Large
Customer transportation capacity to its Electronic Bulletin Board ("EBB")
for competitive bid pursuant to the "Right-of-First-Refusal; Posting of
Pipeline Capacity" provision of Northwest's Tariff, which requires
availability of capacity to be posted to the EBB subject to bid.? All
prearranged terms are indicated below, if applicable.? The prearranged
shipper has the right to match the highest economic value at the end of
the bid period.? If the prearranged shipper does not match the highest
economic value, award of such capacity will be made according to
Northwest's tariff.

NOTE:? BIDS FOR POSTED CAPACITY WILL BE CONDUCTED ELECTRONICALLY AS CLOSED
BIDS ON NORTHWEST PIPELINE'S EBB.? Please contact Candace Karpakis or your
Marketing Services Representative if you encounter any problems with your
EBB bid(s).? DON'T WAIT UNTIL THE LAST MINUTE TO POST YOUR BID.? Time
deadlines are electronically monitored and implemented.

PACKAGE "A"
From the November 14, 2000 Posting
EBB OFFER # 448

RECEIPT ? DELIVERY????? ?? TOTAL??????? INITIAL PRIMARY PREARRANGED
?POINT? ???? POINT ???? ??? DTH/D???????? CONTRACT TERM ??????? ???????
OFFER??

Sumas?????? Puget (Canyon)??? 5,000?????????? 12/01/00 -
12/31/00?????? ????????? YES

Min. Acceptable Bid:??? ??????? $0.032 per Dth of daily Reservation Contract
Demand for
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Flexible Receipt/Delivery Point Rights
Min. Acceptable Bid Vol:?????????? ???? 1 Dth/d
Max. Acceptable Bid Vol:?? ???? 5,000 Dth/d
Bid Open Date:? ??????? 11/27/00 - (5:00 pm Central Time)
Bid Close Date: ??????? 11/28/00 - (5:00 pm Central Time)
Award Deadline: ??????? 11/28/00 - (6:00 pm Central Time)
Evergreen:????? ??????? ??????? NONE
Special Terms & Cond:?? ??????? See 1, 2 and 3 Below.

PACKAGE "GG"
From the November 14, 2000 Posting
EBB OFFER # 447

RECEIPT ? DELIVERY????? ?? TOTAL??????? INITIAL PRIMARY PREARRANGED
?POINT? ???? POINT ???? ??? DTH/D?????? CONTRACT TERM ? ????? OFFER??

Clay Basin?????????? Rifle????????????? 1,850????????? 12/01/00 -
12/31/00????? ???????? YES

Min. Acceptable Bid:??? ??????? $0.02 per Dth of daily Reservation Contract
Demand
for???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
FlexibleReceipt/Delivery Point Rights

Min. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? ?????????????????????? 1 Dth/d
Max. Acceptable Bid Vol:????? ? 1,850 Dth/d
Bid Open Date:? ??????? 11/27/00 - (5:00 pm Central Time)
Bid Close Date: ??????? 11/28/00 - (5:00 pm Central Time)
Award Deadline: ??????? 11/28/00 - (6:00 pm Central Time)
Evergreen:????? ??????? ??????? NONE
Special Terms & Cond:?? ??????? See 1, 2 and 3 Below.

SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. The discount rate shall apply to points utilized by the original shipper
entering into
the transportation agreement with Northwest.

2. A shipper will be allowed to release and/or segment and release the
capacity and
shipper and replacement shipper may utilize any available points on
Northwest's transmission system without impacting the discount for the
original shipper.

3. This prearranged offer is for a reservation contract demand rate.? In
addition to the
Reservation Charge Bid, shipper will pay the volumetric charge, the
applicable
surcharges and fuel.

PROCEDURE FOR BIDDING FOR
AVAILABLE TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY

The following guidelines will be adhered to for all posted packages of
transportation
capacity for electronic bid ("package or packages"):

1. Shipper must submit a separate electronic bid for each package of
available
transportation capacity.? Multiple electronic bid(s) can be submitted for the
total available
transportation capacity under the specified package OR multiple rates can be
submitted each
for a partial amount of available transportation capacity under the specified
package.? If
the same Shipper submits multiple bids, the highest present value for such
package of
available transportation capacity shall be considered the valid bid. All
other bids from the
same Shipper for the same package of transportation capacity will be
discarded.

2. Northwest awards bids based on a net present value calculation.? If bid
rate is less than
minimum tariff rate, the following formula is utilized:? Bid Rate x FERC
Interest Rate x The
Maximum Bid Quantity x 365 days/100/12; or if the maximum rate is bid, the
following formula
is utilized:? Bid Rate x FERC Interest Rate x Maximum Bid Quantity x days
bid/100. In case
of a tie, each tied shipper will have the right to improve its bid by
submitting an improved
bid within 24 hours of the bid close time.? Such improved bid shall be faxed
to (801) 584-7076 to Candace Karpakis or Patrick Aman.? If a tie still
exists, such capacity shall be awarded on a prorata basis.

3. Northwest will not accept bids with a primary contract term (Term) longer
than indicated
for the capacity unless maximum rate is bid.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CREATING A BID FOR
NORTHWEST'S FIRM CAPACITY RELEASE OFFERS

1. Select "CAPACITY RELEASE" application in Northwest Passage.
2. Select "CREATE/SUB BID FOR NWP CAP" application.? All current offers will
appear.
3. Highlight the offer you are interested in by clicking the left mouse
button on the
offer.
4. Select the "TERMS & COND" button at the top of the screen, which is now
active.? The
screen will allow you to review the conditions of the offer.? Close this
screen when
you have finished reviewing.
5. At this point you can review current bids posted for this offer by
selecting the "VIEW
BID" button.? Close this screen when you have finished viewing.
6. If you would like to create a bid for this offer, select "CREATE BID"
button.
7. If you want to bid the maximum rate for the capacity, select the "BID MAX
RATE"
button.
8. Highlight the "END DATE" if you want to modify the end date of the term of
your offer.
9. If you want to modify the receipt/delivery point maximum and minimum
volume, highlight
the receipt/delivery point section with the left mouse button and modify
accordingly. Select
"SAVE".? If an error appears at the button of the screen, the error will need
to be corrected
and the data will need to be saved again.? If successful, a message will
appear indicating
the bid information has saved and the bid rate must be entered.? Select "OK".
10. Select the "RATE" button.? Enter the bid rate.? Select "SAVE".

??????? You have just "CREATED" your bid for the offer.? You now need to
"SUBMIT"
??????? your bid as follows:

11. Close out of all screens and return to the "CAPACITY RELEASE" menu
screens.

12. To Submit or Review your bid(s), select the "REV/SUB/WDRW NWP CAP BID"
button.? All
of your bids will appear.? Highlight the "BID IN DRAFT STATUS" that you would
like to submit
Select the "SUBMIT" button at the top of the screen to post the bid.

To Withdraw your bid(s), select the "REV/SUB/WDRW NWP CAP" button.? All of
your bids will appear.? If the bid has not yet been submitted, highlight the
"BID IN DRAFT STATUS" that you would like to withdraw.? Select the "WITHDRAW"
button at the top of the screen to withdraw the bid.? After a bid has been
withdrawn, you can select the "DELETE" button at the top of the screen to
delete it from the screen.

NOTE:? After each selection, always "REFRESH" the screen to get the latest
status.

Word: F\Short Term/Capacity for Bid-All 2000 November 27, 2000 01-174.doc


Jeff:

Attached is the latest version of the draft revised tariff(s) to file
when ETI gets final full approval.

The revisions are in redline (red and/or blue) per your request.

Let me know any issues.  Steve will be back in town Friday.

Jeremy
B & C

 - Enron CaliforniaTariff Sept v.4.doc


Sir Forney,

This interval MCPE (12:30) has been changed from $999 to $39.31 for 11/1/01.

MJ

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:04 PM
To:	Jacobson, Michael
Subject:	Revised mcpe for 11/1,  interval 1230

The $999 has been deemed questionable.   Can you follow up to see if this is going to be revised?

Thanks,
JMF


"Kitty Fun Barbie"
Complete with Marshmallow the cat (with long, brushable fur), cat toys,
little cans of Fancy Feast, and, get this:  a carrier thaqt becomes a litter
box!  "Marshmallow drinks and wets in the litter box.  Scoop up the clumps
after she goes.  So real!"


---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 10/05/2000
11:53 AM ---------------------------

Katherine Padilla@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/05/2000 11:33 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tom Callaghan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ross
Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cecilia Ramirez/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Y2K Site Directions...

Mitch,

Per your request...Please see the attached for Wheatland, Lincoln & Gleason.
I am still waiting on a reponse from Doyle.

Thanks,
Katherine


JVD, can you let me know when you are ready to talk to me about the Joanne Gregory thing with Winston and Strawn?

Thanks,

S


I will commit to writing the three items that I had hoped to discuss with you
today.  Feel free to get back with me via voice mail (x35926).  If you would
prefer to discuss any of these with me, you can reach me at home from
December 20-23 while I am on vacation.  My home number is 281-370-8568.  I
will be back at work for the week between Christmas and New Years.

1)  January 1:  Do you want me to call you that day after we have tested all
systems to give you a status update?  I can leave a voice mail for you at
your Enron number.  Or if you prefer, I would be happy to call you if you
will provide me with a number where you will be.  Cliff Baxter and several
key commercial personnel have asked that I call them after we have completed
our testing of all systems that support each commodity and product that we
trade in North America.  I will make these phone calls myself, and will
naturally treat all phone numbers that I have been given as confidential.
Please let me know your preference for notification.

2)  Definition of a global focus for trading operations:  Attached is a draft
memo that Rick Causey proposes to send.  This memo describes a coordination
role that I will play on certain operational policies and procedures that
should be coordinated in all trading locations.  Please let me and/or Rick
know if you have any comments or suggestions.  I had hoped to briefly discuss
this with you in person, as I would want you to understand two points:  (1)
This role will not prevent me from continuing a very strong focus on the
needs of ENA.  I have worked very hard to assure a level of accuracy, control
and service in ENA operations.  Through that hard work, I believe that I have
your confidence in my ability to deliver results.  I  would do nothing to
jeopardize that.  (2)  There is a need for this coordination function, and
some one will play that role.  If I play that role, I can be in the best
position to influence outcomes with ENA's needs in mind.

3)   Gas Logistics:  I will talk with Whalley about my thoughts on this, but
I had wanted to make you aware that Jeff Shankman believes that he wants
logistics to report to him.  His stated reason to me is that he wants it to
"look like power".  I had wanted to discuss with you your thoughts on what
the criteria should be on which we make that decision.  I will propose to
Greg and Jeff that gas logistics should be located in direct proximity to the
regional traders in order to facilitate the flow of commercially viable
information about the pipes and capacity.  ( We have that now for the Central
and West desks, and should be able to make this happen as the 32nd floor is
built out for gas.)  I believe, however, that gas logistics should now report
to Brent Price, my business controller over gas for the East, Central and
West regions.  Brent would then have operations truly front to back (risk,
confirmations, scheduling and invoicing) and he sits on 31 and works very
closely with Jeff.   Also, Brent would be in the best position to ensure that
the logistics team meets requirements for timeliness and accuracy of
volumetric information so that we can achieve our target headcount reduction
in gas operations of 52 by year end 2000.  Without a continuing focus in
logistics on the downstream information needs, I will be concerned about our
ability to deliver our projected cost savings.  I also believe that Brent
will be in the best position to ensure minimal flash to actual variances.
While Greg and Jeff were certainly both with ECT in 1996 when we had an
earnings hit as a result of flash to actual variances, I am not sure that
either one was involved closely enough to appreciate the need for a strong
front to back focus to prevent these problems, and that includes holding
logistics accountable for their part in this.

I will let you know the outcome of my conversations with Greg and Jeff on
this issue.


Judge Biren and parties:

 Also, here are the Exhibit Numbers of parties related to the
Comprehensive Settlement

 Exhibit 1 Comprehensive Settlement Agreement

 Exhibit 2 Lad Lorenz Testimony

 Exhibit 3 Eric Nelson Testimony

 Exhibit 4 Mark Pocta Testimony

 Exhibit 5 Tom Beach Testimony

 Exhibit 6 Jeff Dasovich Testimony

 Exhibit 7 Rick Counihan Testimony

 Exhibit 8 John Burkholder Testimony

 Exhibit 9 Paul Amirault Testimony

 Exhibit 10 Jeanne Zaiontz Testimony

 Exhibit 11 Paul McKelvey Testimony

 Exhibit 12 Jeff Fawcett Testimony

 (Ex. 2 thru 12 are direct testimony served May 5)

 Exhibit 13  Rebuttal Testimony of Rick Counihan

 Exhibit 14 Rebuttal Testimony of Lad Lorenz

 Exhibit 15 Rebuttal Testimony of Jeff Dasovich

 Exhibit 16 Rebuttal Testimony of Paul Amirault

 Exhibit 17 Rebuttal Testimony of Jeff Fawcett

 Exhibit 18 Rebuttal Testimony of Tom Beach

 -- Glen Sullivan

 Attorney for SoCalGas and SDG&E


Attached is a memo regarding the above-referenced meeting.


Participants:  Carol St. Clair; Mary Cook; Alan Aronowitz; Mike Smith, James Keller, Mark Haedicke and Elizabeth Sager


One other item:  Could you please request all employment contracts and change
of control agreements, if any?  Thank you.  Michelle


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 09:20
AM ---------------------------
To: mike.grigsby@enron.com
cc:
Subject:

To:
cc:

Subject:

Site is on temporary string lighting, Aux Boiler, with Diesels running.
Investigation into trubine bearing damage and possible Unit Auxiliary
Transformer problems.

V.P. Russ Krieger came over the PA to say "Yahoo San Onofre!" for a job
well done in getting the outage done in 32 days (breaker to breaker, so to
speak). He went on to say that it is not known if the fault was related to
outage work, or if there will be an effect on our outage bonus. He said
we'll be of line for several weeks. I'd say at least that since our turbine
ground to a halt with no DC lube oil, and is still cooling with no jacking.

(See attached file: MVC-038f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-015f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-016f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-020f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-021f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-023f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-028f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-029f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-030f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-031f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-033f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-034f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-035f.jpg)
(See attached file: MVC-011f.jpg)

 - MVC-038f.jpg
 - MVC-015f.jpg
 - MVC-016f.jpg
 - MVC-020f.jpg
 - MVC-021f.jpg
 - MVC-023f.jpg
 - MVC-028f.jpg
 - MVC-029f.jpg
 - MVC-030f.jpg
 - MVC-031f.jpg
 - MVC-033f.jpg
 - MVC-034f.jpg
 - MVC-035f.jpg
 - MVC-011f.jpg


none

From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/07/2001 07:46 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry
Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F
Calger/ENRON@enronXgate, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT,
W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris
Gaskill/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/ENRON@enronXgate,
Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/ENRON@enronXgate, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Jonathan
McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate,
Michael L Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean
Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT,
Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Swerzbin, Mike"
<Mike.Swerzbin2@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, C John Thompson/ENRON@enronXgate,
Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W
Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate,
Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

I asked everyone for their A/A needs and received very little feedback.
Please respond promptly.

Thanks

John


The continued growth of the Enron Europe office and related businesses has
prompted a change in the management of Risk Assessment and Control (RAC) in
London.  Effective in early January, 2001, Ted Murphy will transfer to the
London office and manage the RAC activities which includes credit/market risk
and underwriting. Ted will continue to manage the Enron Global Market Risk
activities.  Steve Young, currently managing RAC in London, will begin a new
assignment within  EBS, also in London.

The Houston Market Risk group will be managed by David Port.

As Enron continues to expand its trading and risk management businesses, it
is vital that trading and credit policies are administered in a consistent
and accurate manner across the company.  Hopefully this realignment will
accomplish that goal.

Please join me in congratulating Ted, David and Steve on their new
assignments.


Jeff,
 In order for California to "shut its doors" it must open its
interconnections with the rest of the west and become a Texas-like electrical
island.  This they cannot do.  California has a substantial investment in
units located in Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah.  The lights would go
out in California if they opened the ties.  In the 1970's there was a hue and
cry over loop flow, with California claiming that it was being injured by
others, particularly by the interior systems trading practices, however they
never considered opening the ties, because the benefits of interconnection
were so large that the "cost" of loop flow was far exceeded by the value of
regional trade, i.e., they are economically interdependent.

 If such a foolish thing were done and California full "closed its doors" by
opening its ties, cost would go up in the Northwest, in California and all
the rest of the Western System.  There are "gains for trade" which accrue to
all parties from interconnection.  The trade is more complicated than just
summer/winter peaks (seasonal load diversity) there is also seasonal resource
diversity (Spring run off effects) and finally there opportunity to
capitalize on storage vs base load thermal operations.  I will address the
last point first to illustrate the complexity of the trading patterns.

 The interior west (Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Arizona and New Mexico) has large
amount of base load coal plants.  As load drops off in those areas, the
energy flows to the coast to back off peaking plants and to back off hydro.
The reduction of hydro production allows night time reservoir refill which
can be used to meet peak load in the Northwest and California.  This can be
seen in the attached file, which contains a set of plots for hourly flow on
the Pacific DC Intertie Jun97, Dec 97, Jun 98, Dec 98, Jun 99, Dec 99,
Jun00.  In these plots the clear day/night exchange of energy can be seen,
especially in the Jun00 plot when sales are being made to California in the
day and to the Northwest at night.  This day to night storage exchange
benefits lowers costs for everyone.

 On top of this daily/weekly cycle, there is the seasonal shift in load
diversity you noted.  For the Northwest, its peak load occurs when energy
production is the lowest -- during the winter.  As a stand alone system, the
Pacific Northwest (i.e., the Columbia Drainage area) is energy constrained.
The hydro in that area does not produce enough energy to meet annual needs.
There is plenty of generating capacity to meet any peak, but not enough to
total water flow.  Energy imports from Wyoming and Montana (e.g. Colstrip and
Bridger) are required to allow the Pacific Northwest to meet its annual
energy requirement.  With these energy inputs from the coal fields, the
seasonal water budget can be arranged to get the most value out of the hydro
system, although fish, navigation, irrigation, etc. impose an increasing
number of constraints.  Energy imports from in the winter from the South help
to meet this energy balance during the winter so water can be reserved until
the snow pack is better know in early Spring.  Some of the sales to the
Northwest from California during the winter are a result of displacement from
Desert Southwest energy moving through California and then up the Interties
to the Northwest.

 Finally, the Spring run off/fish flush when production on the river is at a
maximum and load in the Northwest is down.  The sale of these surpluses paid
for the Pacific Intertie lines and remain important to the entire system.
Much system maintenance of base load units has been historically been planned
to take advantage of this factor.  Again both California and the Northwest
benefit from this trade.

 In all cases, the parties would be worse off if the ties were open and
everyone was on their own.  The Northwest may be capacity long, but it is
typically energy short, even in flush hydro years.  The winter energy imports
from the South hold Northwest costs down just as spring run off sales to the
South lower energy costs in California.  California cannot craft a solo
solution that ignores the rest of the West.  It is probably hard to decide
who would be worst off if California "closed its doors".  It is only clear
that total cost would rise in both California and the rest of the West from
which it divorced itself.

 I hope this rambling response comes at the question you raise.

Steve

	Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	02/28/2001 11:35 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Cost of Protectionism

To Jim's last point.  I understand that the good 'ol utility system was often
operated with little regard for basic economic principles, but there's
something in this that seems very odd and difficult to assess, and it seems
to always be tied to this notion that "California is a net importer, even in
the winter."  I'm going to start with the economics and then let folks
describe why it seemingly doesn't apply in Western electricity markets.

Just about every theory of economics and trade would lead to one conclusion:
If California closes it's doors the other Western states will pay higher
prices for power and/or face increased threats to reliability.  I'm
struggling to try to determine why these basic principles aren't applicable
to Western power markets.  I understand that the PNW is a very complex place
and that the reasons could be embedded in the arcane structure that has
developed over the years.

To keep it simple (though not necessarily accurate), I've confined the
analysis to a world in which only the PNW and California exist.

The basic situation: The PNW peaks in the winter; California peaks in the
summer.

Let's take two scenarios:

1)  The West, less California, is so awash in electricity that even in its
peak--the Winter--it still has power to send to California, i.e., it has so
overbuilt it's system that it has persistent surpluses to sell to California.

Irrespective, there have (to my limited knowledge) always been sales from CA
to the PNW during the winter, when the PNW is peaking.
The only conclusion that one can make, assuming that the PNW is awash in
electricity, is that the PNW takes the power in California because it makes
economic sense to do so. That is, during the winter peaking months, it must
be cheaper on the margin for the PNW to buy from California rather than
produce itself.  Otherwise, it's difficult to understand why it would buy
from California during this month, particularly if they're long.  As such, at
a minimum, the PNW's electric bill will necessarily increase if California
closes its doors.

2) Neither the PNW , nor California, has indigenous capacity to meet peaking
load.  Therefore, the PNW must buy California's power during its peaking
summer period, and California must buy power during it's summer peaking
period.  In this case, not only will the PNW's bill go up if California
closes its doors, the lights are likely to go because they'll be short power.

I realize that this is a simplistic model, and that there could be other
legitimate economic factors driving the flows out of California to the PNW
(e.g., transmission costs).  And again, I also realize that economics may not
have traditionally been a driver in the industry.  But I thought it might be
useful to get a common framework in place as a starting point for the
question that Jim asks.

With that, I'll pose the question (understanding the simplicity of the model
set forth above):  Given that California sends power north--even if the PNW
is long---how can California closing it doors not increase the PNW's cost of
power?

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	02/28/2001 08:05 AM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Cost of Protectionism

It seems to me that this information leads one to conclude that the value of
an open transmission network is that California does not have to build 5,000
MW of power plant (4,500 MW max input + 10%) in state.  In other words, if
California were to disconnect from the grid, someone would have to build
additional power plants in-state.

The cost to California consumers is therefore the annual carrying cost of 10
500 MW plants (made even more expensive after California expropriates the
current fleet of merchant generation).

From the perspective of the remainder of the West, the question still remains
- if California does go it alone, what is the economic impact?  Other than
legal arguments about Interstate Commerce, why should the Federal Government
want to continue to pursue open acess?  This is the hard question that we
need to answer.

Jim

	Alan Comnes@ECT
	02/27/2001 09:40 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Cost of Protectionism

Jim, Jeff:

Jim asked me in a voice mail what would be the cost to California of moving
from the current (evolving) system of open access to a "protectionist"
environment where access to the grid would be determined by a political body
responding to populist pressures.

Here are some things to consider.  We can talk more and I welcome Sue Mara or
Steve Walton's input:

California is a net importer so any restraint of trade would risk the state
being able to meet its own demand.  See attached slides that show PNW-CA
trade.  Even in the winter, power on a net basis flows south.

Limiting open access would primarily act to hold in-state generators hostage.
 this will kill incentives for new investment

If the ISO's proposal for market power mitigation are any guide of where a
protectionist ISO would go:
 in-state generators would be required to sell forward or lose their market
based rate certificates
 load serving entities would be required to contract forward for load and a
reserve margin.
  This is costly: it will lead to centralized planning solutions to
reliability rather than more efficient market     outcomes
 Artifical notions of "just and reasonable" rates (on top of unreasonable
reserve requirements) would lead to severe   reliability problems.  (In other
words, if Steve Peace has his way, the imports into the state will drop
off     signficanly)

There is no reason the state would be more effective at expanding the grid
(e.g., Path 15) than the current system.  (Although, admittedly the current
system has flaws.  The CAISO was set up with little thought to transmission
expansion planning.  Other RTOs are not repeating this mistake.).


FYI Ken, no response or  action required, just a dumb transition mistake at
my end. My apologies to the  board members of? the Center for Houston's
Future. Best,  Vidal
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Vidal G. Martinez  [mailto:vidal@martinez.net]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 11:27  AM
To: Eugene H. Vaughn; Jim C. Kollaer
Subject: Center for  Houston's Future --- lost mail

Gene and Jim,  incredibly, and just today, I received from my previous law
firm's home office  in New York your letter dated January 25, 2000 inviting
me to be one of the 35  participants in the Center for Houston's Future. When
my previous firm closed  it's Houston offices at the end of last December,
all mail was collected and  forwarded to New York for sorting and
redistribution. The mail from January that  should have been sent to me was
apparently sitting in a corner all these months  in the New York mail room of
Curtis, Mallet (my previous firm), and was  delivered to me yesterday,
including your letter. You can imagine what my  reaction was to my previous
firm's management concerning this nine month delay.  I am most distressed,
however, to have missed the opportunity to participate in  the Center for
Houston's Future's endeavors, which I most certainly would have,  and am
somewhat surprised that my failure to respond to such an important effort
never came up in conversation among us?--- we've been around each other
innumerable times since the letter was sent. My apologies to the both of you
and  to the Board of Directors of the Center. I care deeply about this city
and  region, and would have felt privileged to have participated. My best to
the both  of you, Vidal

Vidal  G. Martinez
440 Louisiana, 23rd Floor
Houston, Texas 77002
E-mail: vidal@martinez.net
Direct  Tel:?713.236.7626
Fax:???????  713.223.3946
Cellular:???713.705.1310

?


Vince,

                  Our goal is to validate that the Enron Global Market book
administrators are accurately using the "spread option model" as developed by
the Research Group.    To determine this, we would like to provide you with
the inputs for a particular deal (as provided by a Global Markets book
administrator) and have you recalculate the deal value.   We will then
compare your results to the values calculated by Global Markets.

 Two Koch deals have been chosen due to their substantial P/L effect.  I have
attached the deal data in two forms: (1) the spread option model that Kara
Boudreau, Book Administrator EGM, provided and (2) an excel spreadsheet that
isolates the 2 deals.

 If there is anything more that we could provide, please don't hesitate to
call me at  x30968.

 Thank you so much for all of your help.

 Gillian

1.

2.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Mondo Cane <mondomodern@earthlink.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:34 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	Re: requested pix from Mondo Cane-REPLY

Jeff,
SOOoo sorry! We got 1 number wrong- here is the right #
tracking # 1z 150 x09 03 3938 7473
Let's us know if we can help out with anything else.
Best,
Greg
--
Greg Wooten
Patrick Parrish
Mondo Cane
143 West 22nd Street
New York, New York 10011
1.646.486.7616
1.646.486.7615 Fax

> From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:47:36 -0600
> To: mondomodern@earthlink.net
> Subject: RE: requested pix from Mondo Cane
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I tried checking the tracking number, and it doesn't appear to be a valid
> number.  Can you check the number and send it to me so I can check.
> Thanks...Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Mondo Cane <mondomodern@earthlink.net>@ENRON
> Sent:   Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:38 AM
> To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
> Subject:  Re: requested pix from Mondo Cane
>
> Hi Jeff,
> Your lamp was picked up by UPS on Friday, November 16. It is traveling
> UPS
> Ground (tracking # 1z 150 x09 03 3938 7453). With the holiday week, I
> would
> expect you'll get it just post-Thanksgiving. Let us know if we can do
> anything else. Have a great holiday.
> best, Greg
> --
> Greg Wooten
> Patrick Parrish
> Mondo Cane
> 143 West 22nd Street
> New York, New York 10011
> 1.646.486.7616
> 1.646.486.7615 Fax
>
>> From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:23:54 -0600
>> To: mondomodern@earthlink.net
>> Subject: RE: requested pix from Mondo Cane
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'd like to get the shipping info on the light fixture so I know when
> to
>> expect it due to the holiday.
>>
>> See you soon,
>>
>> Jeff Shankman
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:   Mondo Cane <mondomodern@earthlink.net>@ENRON
>> Sent:   Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:40 PM
>> To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
>> Subject:  requested pix from Mondo Cane
>>
>> Hey Jeff: Here are the photos of the James Mont settees and the Gio
>> Ponti
>> enamel you requested at the Modernism show.
>>
>> The zigzag lamp is being packed and will be on its way via UPS by
>> Thursday,
>> and your receipt is in the mail.
>>
>> Pair James Mont settees:
>> Dimensions: 54" w x 32" deep x 26.5" high
>> Price: $17,000.00
>>
>> Gio Ponti for Del Campo enamel:
>> Dimensions: 12.5" long x 5" deep x .75" high
>> Price: $850.00
>>
>> Please let us know if you have any questions. Hope we see you again
> soon
>> in
>> New York!
>>
>> Becca
>>
>> --
>> Greg Wooten
>> Patrick Parrish
>> Mondo Cane
>> 143 West 22nd Street
>> New York, New York 10011
>> 1.646.486.7616
>> 1.646.486.7615 Fax
>>
>>
>> - Mont settees 3.JPG copy << File: Mont settees 3.JPG copy >>
>>
>>
>>
>> **********************************************************************
>> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and
>> may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the
>> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others
>> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized
>> to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to
> Enron
>> Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
> copies of the
>> message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to
> be an
>> offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
>> enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates)
> and the
>> intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by
> anyone as
>> the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>> **********************************************************************
>
>


John,

Sorry, I missed you on the original distribution list.  I work for Lloyd Will on the East Power Desk and have been coordinating the UBS start up steps related to NERC, ISO's and TP's.

Debra
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Debra
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 9:57 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Reeves, Leslie
Cc:	Will, Lloyd; Forster, David; Jafry, Rahil; Bentley, Corry; Tripp, Garrett; Belden, Tim; Richter, Jeff; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Business information needed for TP, ISO and NERC agreements

Leslie, Jim:

We will need the following information to complete the transmission provider applications, ISO agreements, and NERC memberships.

- Billing Contact including address, number, email etc.
- Customer Contact including address, number, email etc.  (We recommend Corry Bentley for the East, however need to confirm address)
- Routing numbers, billing fax numbers
- UBS AG DUNS number
- Confirm what company name to be utilized for the Transmission Provider, ISO and NERC Regional Reliability Council agreements/memberships.

Leslie, can you assist in helping us finalize the above information.  We would like to begin mailing in the TP, ISO & NERC agreements next week on the 12th.

In regards to NERC ETAG and NERC business entity, we would like to register as UBS.  If we register as UBSWE it may get confused with the East and West scheduling desks.  Therefore, we would like to use the following initials for the NERC scheduling desk codes: UBSE (east desk), UBSW (west desk), UBSC (canada).   I will coordinate this with the West and Canada desks this week, in addition to other remaining steps such as registration with Tradewave for JTSIN OASIS etc.

Debra

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 8:46 PM
To:	Bailey, Debra; Will, Lloyd
Subject:	FW: UBS Names Summary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:09 AM
To:	Guadarrama, Michael; DL-EOL eCommerce Support; Becker, Lorraine; Mandola, Teresa; Mcquade, Jennifer; Carter, Carl; Diamond, Daniel; Jafry, Rahil; Shults, Bob
Cc:	Webb, Jay
Subject:	UBS Names Summary

Following is the summary of names (at least, as things stand as of this minute!)

UBS Names Summary

1) The contracting entity for US Gas and Power Master Agreements, GTC's, ETA's and PA's will be "UBS AG"

2) The entity for US Gas and Power deals (as appears on Product Descriptions) will be "UBS AG, London Branch"

3) The company name for most promotional purposes (e.g. marketing brochures) will be "UBS Warburg Energy", though the full legal version of this name is "UBS Warburg Energy, LLC"

4) Where the keys logo is used, format shall be "<keys> UBS Warburg". References to other names, such as "UBS Warburg Energy" shall be in a separate part of the screen/page.

5) The website address will be www.ubswenergy.com

Questions still outstanding (hopefully will be resolved early next week)

1) The name of the contracting entity for Canadian GTC, Master, ETA, PA.

2) The name of the entity for Canadian Gas and Power Deals.

Conversion Map for Website Contents

Based on the above Names Summary, the following map should apply. If you see any specific instances in which applying this map would result in a questionable result, please see me and I will try to clarify the appropriate treatment.

"Enron Corp" -> "UBS AG"
"Enron North America" -> "UBS AG" on Masters, GTC's, ETA, PA ONLY
"Enron North America" -> "UBS AG, London Branch" on Product Descriptions
"EnronOnline" -> "UBSWenergy"
"www.enrononline.com" -> "www.ubswenergy.com"
"Enron" -> "UBS"


William Head
1930 Oro Court
Clearwater, FL 33764
LHEAD@JUNO.COM

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

William Head


Sara

I will be out the rest of the week on a family emergency. Lucy should be able
to help.

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT on 10/11/99 03:07 PM
---------------------------
Sean Black   10/11/99 11:42 AM

To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Holmes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spark Spread Confirmation

Dale/Bart/Sara,

We need to clean up the confirmation and any other legal information that
accompanies it (Bart/Sara, is the attached Omnibus T&Cs we proposed to use
standard documentation or are any revisions necessary prior to sending out to
CCSI?) so that we can send this out to CCSI for their review.

Looking at the confirmation, I see the following items that need to be
revised:

Trade date/Signing date - Not yet confirmed; will insert date the deal is
closed when it is known.
Need to specify which curve to look at in the Gas Daily Index (there is a low
high and a mid or average); we did not specify which one we would refer to
previously
Do we need to replace ECT with ENA throughout??
Catalytica should be Catalytica Combustion Systems (the subsidiary not the
parent)
Need to add in details about CCSI (name/title/payment account info etc.)

Sean - I will get the info for 5 from CCSI

Dale - Could you correct number 2, advise on number 3 and review the document
again to see if any other information is lacking that should be included?

Bart/Sara  - Could you advise about the details on the Omnibus (I have
misplaced any copy of this)  I thought there were some credit issues that
needed to be filled in at the bottom of this?

If anyone else could advise on other items that need to be addressed with
either the Confirmation and/or the Omnibus agreement, now is the time!

Regards,


Sara, I just the message you just left about playing phone tag with Anna at
Bear Stearns.  As the lotus notes and the attached correspondence indicates,
I was proactive today in contacting Anna to follow through since she did not
return my last call a few days ago.  Since we already have a meeting set up
for tomorrow at 10, I guess her message to you must be old (unless she is not
the person responding to her email).  I also spoke this week with the
attorneys representing the other brokerage firms and resent comments to them
after they confessed that they had misplaced the previous ones.  Thus, from
my perspective, we have been diligent in trying to open the accounts.

I too would like for us to discuss the other tasks that have to be done.
However, I cannot meet today to do so at all.  I am troubleshooting several
ABSOLUTELY URGENT tasks that have to get done today for ITG and for the CYNET
deal.  I am available to meet tomorrow at my earliest convenience.

 As you may or may not know, we had two other "EMERGENCIES" with respect to
brokerage accounts having to do with Frost, Cynet and another -- I cannot
even remember which.  And, aside from these, we just executed four agreements
in the past week.

I want to reassure you that I believe to the best of everyone's ability we
are as diligent as possible in getting these things done.   I will contact
Keegan to set up a meeting as soon as possible tomorrow to talk about Enron
Credit Inc.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
----- Forwarded by Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 02:54 PM -----

	"Meytina, Anna Confidential Memo-Counsel (Exchange)" <ameytina@bear.com>
	03/21/2001 01:30 PM

		 To: "'Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com'" <Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: BS-Enron Credit Inc.

Cheryl:

I am available any time after 10:00 New York time.

Regards,

Anna Meytina

> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com [SMTP:Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com]
> Sent:   Wednesday, March 21, 2001 2:20 PM
> To:   ameytina@bear.com
> Subject:   BS-Enron Credit Inc.
>
> Hi Anna, do you want to talk about this agreement sometime tomorrow before
> noon.  I willl be out all day Friday at a funeral.
>
> Cheryl Nelson
> Senior Counsel
> EB3816
> (713) 345-4693

***********************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 09:13 AM -----

	Walter Guidroz@ENRON
	01/12/2001 05:21 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 1/12/01

Attached are approvals for January 12, 2001.  You'll note that several
amended counterparties appear; in these cases ONLY THE CELLS HIGHLIGHTED IN
YELLOW should be changed within the user profile for a given counterparty.
Hopefully this will save some time both for credit as well as for product
control.  As in the past, counterparties who are declined are crossed out
across the profile.  New counterparties are highlighted as necessary.

Please call if you have any questions; thanks.

Walter


FYI -

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Iannarone, Lauren
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	McKalip-Thompson, Catherine
Subject:	anderson

06/20/2001 The Globe and Mail Metro B13 "All material Copyright (c) Bell Globemedia Publishing Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved." WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, in one of the first fraud cases ever filed against a Big Five accounting firm, fined Arthur Andersen LLP and three partners more than $7-million (U.S.) in connection with audits of Waste Management Inc.'s annual financial results.
In a complaint filed in U.S. District Court here, the SEC alleged that Arthur Andersen and its partners allowed Waste Management to continue for several years a series of improper accounting practices that inflated the garbage-hauling concern's earnings. The complaint alleges fraud on the part of three audit partners assigned to the Waste Management account: Robert Allgyer, 56 years old, of Lake Forest, Ill., who has retired; Walter Cercavschi, 45, of Harwood Heights, Ill.; and Edward Maier, 54, of Chicago.
Arthur Anderson agreed to pay the fine to settle the case, but the firm and the auditors don't admit or deny the allegations. Among the audit partners, Mr. Allgyer agreed to pay $50,000, Mr. Maier, $40,000, and Mr. Cercavschi, $30,000. Arthur Andersen agreed to pay $7-million.  As part of a campaign to curb what it sees as growing accounting fraud, the SEC has broadened a number of investigations of companies' earnings reports to include audit work done by outside accountants.  In bringing the first fraud case against any audit firm since 1985, SEC enforcement chief Richard Walker said the action "helps to underscore the importance of auditors as gatekeepers to our capital markets and shows the SEC won't shy away from making auditors comply with their responsibilities."  Under a related administrative proceeding filed yesterday alleging professional misconduct, the SEC also censured Arthur Andersen, the three audit partners and a fourth partner, Robert Kutsenda, who was the regional audit director at the time of the alleged violations. As part of the censure, the four audit partners are barred from doing accounting work for public companies for a period of one to five years.  "This settlement allows the firm and its partners to close a very difficult chapter and move on," said Terry Hatchett, Arthur Andersen's managing partner-North America. "The SEC has not questioned the underlying quality or effectiveness of our overall audit methodology, nor has the SEC limited our ability to conduct audits for other public companies."  An attorney for Mr. Allgyer declined to comment. Attorneys for Mr. Maier, Mr. Cercavschi and Mr. Kutsenda didn't return phone calls.  Waste Management said it "has co-operated fully with the SEC in the investigation, and does not believe that the SEC will seek any action against Waste Management in connection with the events detailed in the Arthur Andersen settlement."  The Waste Management accounting scandal stands out for it size and breadth. After a board-led probe turned up years of questionable accounting, the company took a $3.5-billion charge in 1998, and since then the trash hauler and Arthur Andersen agreed to pay $220-million to settle shareholder litigation in the matter.  The company admitted it had overstated its pretax earnings by $1.43-billion in 1992 to 1996 -- the biggest restatement in SEC history. Neither Waste Management nor any of its employees have been disciplined by the SEC. The SEC said yesterday that the investigation continues.  Within the SEC, the Arthur Anderson investigation became a centrepiece of the commission's aggressive campaign to demonstrate that conflicts of interest can be caused by consulting and other non-auditing services that numerous accounting firms now routinely offer audit clients.


In order to provide more stability to the Unify Gas application, we'd like to
start performing morning reboots of the database system starting at 6:30 AM.
Please run this by your groups to see if it's okay with them.

This is a short term precaution until Sybase fixes the new bug we have
identified (i.e. server hanging, people can't get work done which results in
hour glasses).  The reboot should take approimately 25 minutes, which
includes a prime script which caches a lot of the more frequently used data
for better performance.

I'll give you a date it will start unless I hear there is some reason we
can't do this.

If you have questions, please ask.

Thanks


Dearest Brother and Sister,

First of all HAPPY THANKSGIVING.  We Talked about you and how improtant our
family is on several occasions during the last few days. Hope your
Thanksgiving was as wonderful as ours. Jon Christopher, Mike, Nina, and
Elizabeth were here ( Columbia) for Thanksgiving. As usual, we talked, ate,
and enjoyed each other. It has become a family tradition to go to
Shakespeares Pizza, Ernies (ERNWAS) Steakhouse, and Booches (Hamburgers)
everytime any family member comes. Nina cooked some Russian quisine. The
weather was fairly decent for Missouri Thanksgiving (dry, 30 - 50 F).
Elizabeth saw Rugrats in Paris. Dalmations , and went to the parks. We
stayed behind and did other things including watching "Hurricane", a very
powerful movie.  Today we have been taking care of all those errands and
routines that are necessary after a weekend of company. We had a good time.

I talked to Ruby last evening. She has probably telephoned both of you by
now. She is sending some cookies to all of us, mostly using Mother's
recipes. How thankful I am to still have her.  And she seems to be in good
health. She is always so positive. She says that the second week in August
is probably the best weekend for the family reunion at our place in Crane
next year.  That would be August 11. How would that be for the two of you?
It would be fine with us. If you are in agreement I will send out the
invitations soon. If not, let me know so I can change it as you are two
important people for us and for the whole family.

We will be going to Thailand on February 5 and returning on March 4. I will
give you all numbers etc where we can be reached. We will have an apartment
in Bangkok but will be all over the Country. Karl and Ila Kruse will be with
us for two weeks. We are really looking forward to it.

Ken and Linda, we really enjoyed seeing you in Columbia. As usual you were
at your  best.

Sharon, We are having our usual big Christmas party on December 23. Any
chance you would be coming to Columbia? We would sure love to have you if
you
 can.
Ken We discussed getting together in Dec. That may not be possible because
of all of our schedules. If not lets look at jAN. For both of you, what does
your schedule look like?
Thats all for now. Let me know about the family reunion date (Sat, Aug. 11)
as soon as possible. Talk to you soon. Love. Bonnie


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dickson, Stacy E.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:35 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Cc:	Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	Bridgeline EOL Amendment

Mark,

Here is Bridgeline.  They do not trade power.

Stacy


This may be pertinent.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 02:46 PM -----

	Justin Boyd
	08/09/2000 12:54 PM

		 To: Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
		 cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: FX Transactions

Jon,

I had a glance over the written paper from Sullivan & Cromwell as to FX
Transactions, and it seems to me that there would be fewer US regulatory
issues (should there be any), if we were to use MG Brokers Inc, the FCM
entity.  Are there any other reasons why we would not want to use this entity?

[Mark/Alan/Marcus - I have separately sent you by email the Sullivan &
Cromwell paper]

Thanks.
Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 09/08/2000 18:49
---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
09/08/2000 16:37
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Sid
Tipples/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: FX Transactions

---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
09/08/2000 16:36 ---------------------------
From: Alfred Pennisi@MGUSA on 09/08/2000 06:50 EDT
To: Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
cc:

Subject: Re: FX Transactions

Jon,

My suggestion would be for the FX business be run out of a NON FCM firm in
the states (NY) since it is a non-regulated product.

If you have an questions please call me at x5845.

regards,

Alfred Pennisi
MG London Inc.
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5845
E-mail: alfred.pennisi@mglondon.com


Here are my draftversions of the weather GTC's.  Since Enron North America
will be the Enron contracting entity for all of the transactions, I have
expanded the documents to allow for European as well as U.S. transactions and
to allow for multiple weather station (index) deals or single weather station
deals.  The option forms work for either a put or call but that has to be
specified on the web site.  I think it would make sense for one of the
weather commercial people to take a quick look at the forms to make sure they
agree that they work.  I'm hoping to sit down with Mark Dilworth in the
morning to make sure the long descriptions are complete - when you look at
these forms, it is clear that a number of defined terms have to be covered on
the web site: Premium, Effective Date, Termination Date, Reference Weather
Station(s), Fallback Reference Weather Station(s), Reference Basis, Reference
Degrees (C or F), Strike Amount, Notional Amount and Maximum Payout Limit are
the terms I have identified so far.

Please Note - these are NOT ready to be uploaded to the system!  There are
blanks for the weather agencies for the European deals - these are not
referenced in the earlier UK drafts and I don't know who the appropriate
agencies are.  I have not spelled out the data sources for the European
transactions either.

Mark


Attached please find a sheet of principles.  We would like your suggestions
for 3 or 4 more.

 <<Principles 2.doc>>

 - Principles 2.doc


The original message was received at Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:21:09 -0400 (EDT)
from sasmh3.morgan.com [144.14.193.98]

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
<marovich@pismh6>... Successfully delivered

   ----- Message header follows -----

Return-Path: <Marie.Heard@enron.com>
Received: from sasmh3.ms.com (sasmh3.morgan.com [144.14.193.98])
        by pismh6.ms.com (8.8.5/imap+ldap v2.4) with ESMTP id KAA18366
        for <marovich@pismh6>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:21:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from root@localhost)
        by sasmh3.ms.com (8.8.5/imap+ldap v2.4) with X.500 id KAA24095
        for marovich@pismh6.ms.com; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:21:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hqvsbh1.ms.com (hqvsbh1-i0.morgan.com [199.89.99.101])
        by sasmh3.ms.com (8.8.5/imap+ldap v2.4) with ESMTP id KAA24090
        for <marovich@ms.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:21:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hqvsbh1-edmz.ms.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hqvsbh1.ms.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BB5D2203DB
	for <joseph.marovich@msdw.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:21:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9])
	by hqvsbh1-edmz.ms.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127E5200B4
	for <joseph.marovich@msdw.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:21:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw02p.corp.enron.com [192.168.110.109])
	by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08) with ESMTP id f9QEL6326276
	for <joseph.marovich@msdw.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:21:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified) by corp.enron.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with SMTP id <T56d4b8c347c0a86e6d888@corp.enron.com> for <joseph.marovich@msdw.com>;
 Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:21:05 -0500
Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX07V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.98]) by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
	 Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:21:04 -0500
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Return-Receipt-To: "Heard, Marie" <Marie.Heard@ENRON.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C15E29.38C27E28"
Disposition-Notification-To: "Heard, Marie" <Marie.Heard@ENRON.com>
Subject: Assignment of Convertible Book
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:19:28 -0500
Message-ID: <17468912FC16BA4DAE4FA474F1B320AA095670@NAHOU-MSMBX07V.corp.enron.com>
Thread-Topic: Assignment of Convertible Book
Thread-Index: AcFeKTfACF1g6mTbSQOXZ9RmQNKtPg==
From: "Heard, Marie" <Marie.Heard@ENRON.com>
To: <joseph.marovich@msdw.com>
Cc: "Brogan, Theresa T." <Theresa.T.Brogan@ENRON.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2001 14:21:04.0994 (UTC) FILETIME=[7273B420:01C15E29]

   ----- Message body suppressed -----


Soft money giving statistics (2000):

Federal PAC giving statistics (1999-7/00):
Republicans:  67%  Democrats:  33%
Committee members:  47%
Leadership PACs:    8%
Parties:     39%
Other PACs:     3%

States:
PAC giving breakdown:  Republicans:  77%  Democrats:  23%
More information on party control to follow.

Excerpt from Lobbying Working Group documentation regarding contributions:

Recommended Guidelines for Choosing Recipients of Political Contributions*

1. Key Decision-Makers
? Leadership
? Committee Members
? Jurisdiction (Generally, only state-level office holders)

2. Pro-Business

3. Receptive to Key Enron Issues

4. Risk Management

5. Hedge our Bets

6. Timing: Primaries vs. General Elections

7. Identify Opportunities for Giving to Other PACs

*Note:  These guidelines are intended to apply both to PAC and Corporate
funds.
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES on 08/09/2000
06:25 PM ---------------------------

Melinda McCarty@ENRON
08/03/2000 03:28 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth
Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Barbara A
Hueter/DUB/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES, Marcia A
Linton/HOU/EES@EES, Betsy Raybon/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allison
Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laurie Knight/DUB/EES@EES, Joseph Alamo/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Political Contribution Strategies Mtg

This meeting has been set for Thursday, August 10 @ 10:00 (Central Time) in
Team room 4795.  Dial in number
1-800-991-9019 Pass code 6608281.

Participants

Steve Kean
Rick Shapiro
Jim Steffes
Elizabeth Labanowski
Elizabeth Linnell
Cynthia Sandherr
Sandi McCubbin
Barbara Hueter

Thanks,
melinda
x31641


I know that it is a finesse but I would rather not have a specific date
(although we would prefer a specific date relative to no clarity on this
matter):

If I were writing it it would something like:
In no case shall the rate freeze, as defined by AB1890, end before the CPUC
has determined replacement rates.  And in no case shall such determination of
replacement rates,  beyond the end of AB 1890 term (Mar 2002).

Such wording means supports our claim of negative ctc up to new setting of
rates.  It also allows us to argue with customers that we switched them for
their own good.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 01/29/2001 12:37 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Conversations with Customers on Date Certain for End of Rate Freeze
in Legislation

I've left messages describing our idea with TURN and the large
cogenerators/marketers/producers, and I've spoken with the Farm Bureau and
the California Manufacturers Association.  The Bureau and CMA agree with our
idea and I've asked them to "pass the word along" to other customer groups
and to try to ensure that its an integral part of the negotiations.  I'll be
calling other customer groups and will report back on those conversations.

Best,
Jeff


So you bought me a new winter coat for New York-Thanks-I ned it.  The card is
adorable-how did you do it.  I love it.


Dad,

Apparently Duke Energy injected 50 Million of cash into Canadian 88. Greg
Novall has been replaced as President and CEO.

Chris


Are you planning to address Lech's request?  Or is he in need of details that somebody else at Cadwalader already has?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 10:51 AM
To:	Heinitz, Mary J.; Korkmas, Deb
Subject:	UCC filings

It might be easiest if you would send me the agreements related to the UCC
filings.  That way, I will have names, addresses, etc., in one place.
Thank you.

Lech Kalembka
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038
Tel.: (212) 504-6918
Fax: (212) 504-6666
E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================