[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Todays IPOs  [IMAGE] IPO - Quiet Periods   [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Period     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for TXN  follows from EquityAlert.com.     OpenVoB Successfully Completes CallFests III & IV; Participating Vendors Recognized for Superior Effort and EquipmentAvail Networks, Broadcom, General Bandwidth, Intel, Ishoni Networks, MetaSwitch, Texas Instruments and Xavi Test Standards-Based Deployment Models for Interoperable Voice Over Broadband Services   RICHARDSON, Texas, Nov 19, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- OpenVoB(tm), the industry consortium dedicated to accelerating the deployment of Voice-over-Broadband (www.openvob.org), today announced the success of the group's third and fourth CallFests(tm), multi-vendor interoperability test events held Oct. 7-15 and Nov. 12-16, 2001, at the University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory in Durham, N.H.   These CallFests focused on interoperability between multiple voice gateway and integrated access devices (IADs) based on the ATM Forum's Loop Emulation Services (LES) voice over AAL2 specification. The testing was done to address provisioning and management of the IADs based on the ATM Forum's recently released LES EOC/MIB specification.   CallFests form a critical step in the mass deployment of voice over broadband services. Testing of the LES EOC/MIB specification will ultimately enable service providers to support flow through provisioning of new services.   In a network able to support flow-through provisioning, an order is entered by a customer service representative on the top-most system, and it "flows through" all other intermediate systems, finally affecting the configuration of the network to set up an end-to-end circuit. Provisioning is automated, reducing costs and errors. Flow-through provisioning ensures that the cost of provisioning a derived voice line will not be higher than the costs of a POTS circuit nor as error prone as manual provisioning.   "CallFest III and IV were largely successful because of the dedication and commitment shown by the members and equipment vendors that were present," stated Paul Drew, OpenVoB Technical Editor and Interoperability manager. "We are enthusiastic about the progress that we have made and look forward to future CallFests and assisting the standards bodies in advancing the roll-out of voice over broadband technology."   OpenVoB is working with the University of New Hampshire's InterOperability Laboratory to establish an on-going interoperability testing network within their labs which has been made possible through the generous support of leading access network and testing vendors including Cisco Systems (LightStream 1010 ATM Switch), Avail Networks (Frontera 2200 SHDSL Access Switch), Sage Instruments (935AT Voice Quality Tester), Malden Electronics (DSLA Speech Performance Measurement System), RADCOM (ATM Protocol Analyzer) and Spirent Communications (Abacus Class 5 Switch Simulator).   The end product of the OpenVoB CallFest series is a set of validated implementation models and corresponding test plans that will be submitted to the appropriate standards bodies to help accelerate the adoption and deployment of voice over broadband technology and services.   If you are interested in participating in upcoming CallFests or becoming a member of OpenVoB, please send an e-mail to info@openvob.org.   About OpenVoB  OpenVoB (or Open Voice over Broadband) was formed to meet the expressed needs of service providers planning to deploy voice over broadband services by facilitating multi-vendor, system-level interoperability of packetized voice services based on existing and emerging industry specifications. The group leverages a cooperative engineering approach to create deployment models and test plans that enable and promote the development of interoperable gateways, IADs, softswitches and other VoB products from multiple vendors.   Current broadband-enabling member companies of the OpenVoB include 2Wire, Accelerated Networks (Nasdaq:ACCL), Accordion Networks, ADTRAN (Nasdaq:ADTN), Atlantic Telecom, Avail Networks, Broadcom Corporation (Nasdaq:BRCM), Brecis Communications, Convergent Networks, Efficient Networks, General Bandwidth, GlobeSpan (Nasdaq:GSPN), Integral Access, Intel (Nasdaq:INTC), ipVerse, Ishoni Networks, MetaSwitch, Netopia (Nasdaq:NTPA), Polycom (Nasdaq:PLCM), Rapid5 Networks, Santera Systems, Sphere Communications, Texas Instruments' Telogy Networks (Nasdaq:TXN), VINA Technologies (Nasdaq:VINA) and Xavi.   Members of OpenVoB have drafted a white paper that outlines the pressing need for this organization and presents a road map detailing the steps the group is taking to reach its primary objectives. The white paper can be found on the OpenVoB Web site (http://www.openvob.org), which also hosts a wealth of information about the OpenVoB organization, FAQs, online technical discussion groups and other resources. For more information about becoming a member of OpenVoB, please e-mail info@openvob.org.   CONTACT:          OpenVoB                   Tabitha Bailey, 805/241-2532                   Tabitha.bailey@openvob.org URL:              http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.  Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          TEXAS NEW HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRY KEYWORD: TELECOMMUNICATIONS                   COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS                   HARDWARE                   NETWORKING                   INTERNET                   SOURCE:                   OpenVoB    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of International Mercantile Corp we are receiving 100,000 shares of International Mercantile Corp from a third party for distribution of this advertisement.  We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Power Option PLUS Logo    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/30/2001 11:56
AM ---------------------------

sandra delgado <sdelgado_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 01/30/2001 11:37:58 AM
To: KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM
cc:

Subject: 31JAN HOUSTON TO NEW YORK -- TICKETED

                                                   SALES AGT: JH/X8WEHZ

                                          MANN/C KAY

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  KAY MANN X57566

  DATE:  JAN 30 2001                   ENRON

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  31JAN HOUSTON TX     NEW YORK NY    940A    157P
CO 1966    A          WED   G.BUSH INTERCO LA GUARDIA
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL M
                            LUNCH                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:17 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300

HOTEL                 31JAN OMNI BERKSHIRE PLACE
                      02FEB 21 EAST 52ND STREET AND MADISON AVE
                            NEW YORK, NY 10022
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 1-212 7535800
                            FAX: 1-212 7545018
                            CONFIRMATION: 1008660779
                            REFERENCE: A1KABC
                            SINGLE ROOM KING SIZE BED
                            RATE: ABC USD 287.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            REQ KINGNS
              **24 HOUR CANCEL POLICY AT THE OMNI BERKSHIRE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  02FEB NEW YORK NY    HOUSTON TX     1152A   257P
CO 1961    A          FRI   LA GUARDIA     G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL M     TERMINAL C
                            LUNCH                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         4:05 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300

      AIR FARE 1888.36      TAX 150.14          TOTAL USD
2038.50

                                            AIR TOTAL USD
2038.50

                                        INVOICE TOTAL USD
2038.50

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/L9S2FX

TICKET:                                         CO/ETKT  0057024436937
CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
**CONTINENTAL RECORD LOCATOR: L9S2FX
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Hey, the last I heard -- Tuesday -- there wasn't going to be any legislation
--  and that's why the Gov and Lynch were taking their strong and ugly
stances? Whast happened?

Did we try to get some language in there?  Seems as if we were out-played

Jeff Dasovich on 08/11/2000 09:58:07 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Kean, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES,
Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, mpalmer@enron.com, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman@EES, Mary Hain@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Energy rate relief bill gets OK
State Senate passes rollback; legislation to go to Assembly

Energy rate relief bill gets OK
State Senate passes rollback; legislation to go to Assembly
By Ed Mendel
STAFF WRITER
August 11, 2000

SACRAMENTO -- The state Senate approved legislation yesterday that would cut
San Diego's soaring electric bills by half and could credit consumers for
excess rates paid since June 1.
The measure, if passed by the Assembly and signed by the governor, would
reduce bills to the level San Diego Gas & Electric Co. customers were paying
in July 1999. While customer payments would be cut in half, however, SDG&E
ratepayers could be liable in several years for the balance.
The credit to consumers would hinge on a finding of improper overcharges by
power companies.
The rollback-and-reimbursement measure -- carried by two San Diego Democrats,
Sen. Dede Alpert and Assemblywoman Susan Davis -- sailed out of the Senate
with support from 24 Democrats and four Republicans.
All three of the Republicans who represent parts of San Diego County voted
for the bill. The 27th vote needed for two-thirds approval of the urgency
measure came from Sen. Bill Morrow, R-Oceanside.
"We have a dysfunctional market that is not working and has been just so
incredibly painful for the people I represent," Alpert told the Senate. "We
need your help. We need it now."
San Diego is the first area of the state fully affected by deregulation
legislation enacted four years ago. But other areas will be deregulated
within two years, and legislators do not want soaring rates in their
districts.
A vote on the Alpert-Davis bill in the Assembly was delayed for at least a
week because of potential opposition from Republicans. Gov. Gray Davis, who
is proposing a similar reduction that would not be retroactive to June 1, has
taken no position on the bill.
"It's important to keep this bill moving along," said Morrow, who said he
struggled with the vote because the bill does nothing to speed up the
construction of new power plants.
The bill, AB 2290, would cut rates to the July 1, 1999, level and make the
reduction retroactive to June 1 of this year. State and federal regulatory
agencies would be asked to determine if San Diego ratepayers have been
improperly overcharged.
In the years ahead, San Diego ratepayers could be reimbursed for high rates
paid this summer through a credit that would lower their monthly bills -- but
only if the investigation finds an improper overcharge and that repayment can
be collected from those responsible.
Alpert said the cost of the credit could be born by energy generators for
overcharging, SDG&E for failing to make cheaper energy purchases, and the
state and federal government for not protecting ratepayers.
"I don't think anybody believes anybody is going to be 100 percent
responsible for this," Alpert said.
The governor Wednesday asked the Public Utilities Commission to meet Aug. 21
and reduce rates for SDG&E customers by half, dropping a typical residential
bill from the current level of $120 a month to $65.
The governor's plan is similar to the Alpert-Davis bill, but it's not
retroactive to June 1 and would take effect this month. Critics of the
governor's plan doubt that an investigation will result in the recovery of an
overcharge from generators, marketers or SDG&E.
Nettie Hoge, executive director of The Utility Reform Network, said that what
Davis has proposed is likely to be not a true rate reduction, but simply a
plan to spread the payment of high rates over several years.
"San Diegans can't afford a pay now and pay later scheme," Hoge said. "They
are in the midst of an economic and public health crisis."
The Alpert-Davis bill needs at least six Republican votes for approval in the
Assembly. Alpert said two Assembly Republicans representing parts of San
Diego, Charlene Zettel of Poway and Pat Bates of Laguna Niguel, support the
bill and are listed as co-authors.
She hopes to get support from three other San Diego County Republicans: Steve
Baldwin of El Cajon, Howard Kaloogian of Encinitas and Bruce Thompson of
Fallbrook.
Assembly GOP Leader Scott Baugh of Huntington Beach said the bill should be
heard in committees, rather than simply put up for a vote on the house floors
without public hearings.
"To just ram through a rate rollback, a rate freeze and a rate reimbursement
does nothing to address the underlying problems that created the energy
shortage," he said.
Baugh said he would like a discussion of the contention by some that rebate
checks that began going out to SDG&E customers this week will solve much of
the problem this year.
He said standby generators could be built within six months to provide power
in periods of peak demand to protect San Diegans from high rates next summer.
The rebate checks are a $390 million refund for overcharges related to
deregulation and amount to $260 for the average household. An additional $100
million refund will take the form of a credit on bills for August and
September, totaling $34 for the typical residence.
At a legislative committee hearing on deregulation, Sen. Steve Peace, D-El
Cajon, clashed with Loretta Lynch, president of the Public Utilities
Commission. He said the refund checks only go to residences and small
businesses, not medium-sized businesses hurt by high rates.

Copyright 2000 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.


EU backs MTBE despite US prohibition
ENDS Daily - 22/03/00
-------------------------
The European Commission said today it had no plans to
propose an EU ban on petrol additive MTBE after the US
Environmental Protection Agency proposed to "significantly
reduce or eliminate" use of the substance.  The agency says
MTBE (methyl tertiary-butyl ether) is a "possible
carcinogen" which has caused considerable damage to
groundwater.

Speaking on Monday, agency head Carol Browner said the move
was "necessary to protect America's drinking water
supplies."  She said the USA would be replacing the additive
with ethanol, a non-petrochemical alternative.  A
spokesperson for environment commissioner Margot Wallstr"m
said she was "following the reasons why" the US had proposed
its restrictions but had "no immediate plans" to call for
similar EU rules.

MTBE use in the US has tripled over the last decade.  It
forms around 11% of "reformulated gasoline" - a compulsory
fuel in some big cities, where it helps to reduce air
emissions.  However, it leaks from pipes and storage tanks
and has caught public attention because it also makes water
taste foul at very low concentrations.

In Europe, MTBE is used instead as an octane booster, and
typically only at concentrations of around 1.6% though it is
permitted up to 15%.  New EU fuel and air quality laws aimed
at eliminating benzene mean the use of MBTE is set to
increase dramatically, however.

MTBE expert Eberhard Morgenroth of the Technical University
of Denmark says the EU will soon face a "political dilemma"
between protecting air quality and groundwater.  "National
environmental protection agencies are only slowly starting
to realise the extent of problems connected to drinking
water contamination with MTBE," he says.  "It might be that
in 10 years we will have the similar problems to the US."

Denmark last month announced plans to improve petrol station
storage standards after serious MBTE contamination was found
at some sites (ENDS Daily 8 February).  Germany has also
found contaminated sites, some formerly occupied by Soviet
troops.  Neither is contemplating a ban because alternative
octane boosters such as benzene are more toxic.

There are no EU environmental quality limits governing MTBE,
but an EU-sponsored risk assessment is underway in Finland,
Europe's heaviest per-capita consumer.  An oil industry
source said a ban would "clearly put a restriction on [fuel]
blending" and would "not be a trivial problem," but said no
work had been done to estimate the impact of a ban.  As one
of the world's top ten high production volume chemicals,
however, economic effects would very likely be significant.


>2001 Haas School Faculty Alumni Colloquium:
>Saturday, May 5, 2001 - 8:30 am to 2:00 pm
>
>FREE ADMISSION TO ALL HAAS STUDENTS, FACULTY, & STAFF
>  **RESERVATIONS REQUIRED** (see details below)
>  [DEADLINE: April 27, 2001]
>
>
>KEYNOTE:
>The keynote speaker, Patricia C. Dunn, AB 75, Global Chief Executive
>Officer, Barclays Global Investors (BGI), will discuss "Investment
>Management in an Era of Individual Retirement Planning". Barclays Global
>Investors is the world's largest institutional investment manager and the
>largest institutional investment manager and the largest provider of
>structured investment strategies, including indexing, tactical asset
>allocation and quantitative active strategies. After 30 years, BGI
>continues its history of performance through innovation by focusing on the
>three dimensions of Total Performance Management: return, risk and cost.
>
>Dunn's remarks will be followed by four faculty-led sessions touching on
>Economics, the California electricity crisis, the National and Bay Area
>economic and real estate outlook, and organizing the knowledge worker.
>
>
>AGENDA:
>
>8:30-9:00
>Registration & Coffee
>
>9:00-9:15
>Welcome and Introduction:
>Laura D'Andrea Tyson, Dean
>
>9:15-10:00
>KEYNOTE ADDRESS
>Patricia Dunn, BA 75, Global Chief Executive, Barclays Global Investors
>Investment Management in an Era of Individual Planning
>
>10:00-10:15
>Break
>
>10:15-11:30
>SESSION I
>A. Faculty Speaker: Michael Katz
>Does the New Economy Need a New Antitrust?
>
>B. Faculty Speaker: Ken Rosen
>The National and Bay Area Economic and Real Estate Outlook
>
>11:30-12:45
>Lunch
>
>12:45-2:00
>
>SESSION II
>A. Faculty Speaker: Severin Borenstein
>The California Electricity Crisis: Are Policymakers Learning the Right
>Lessons?
>
>B. Faculty Speaker: Homa Bahrami
>Organizing Knowledge Workers: Perspectives from Silicon Valley
>
>2:00
>Conclusion
>
>
>REGISTRATION:
>
>Name:
>Degree Class Year:
>Job Title:
>Company:
>Day Time Phone Number:
>Fax Number:
>Preferred Email Address:
>
>*Confirmation sent by email and fax only*
>
>Preferred Mailing Address:
>Street Address:
>City/ State / Zip Code:
>
>Guest Name(s) & Job Title/Company (if applicable):
>  YOUR GUESTS MUST PAY REGISTRATION FEE:
>$35 (if register by April 27); $40 (late / on-site registration)
>
>
>~Please note which section you will attend in each session~
>Session 1:
>[  ]  Section A - Does the New Economy Need a New Antitrust? (Katz)
>[  ]  Section B - The National and Bay Area Economic and Real Estate
>Outlook (Rosen)
>
>Session 2:
>[  ]  Section A - The California Electricity Crisis: Are Policymakers
>Learning the Right Lessons? (Borenstein)
>[  ]  Section B - Organizing Knowledge Workers: Perspectives from Silicon
>Valley (Bahrami)
>
>
>  **Includes session materials, networking roster, and boxed lunch**
>
>  Reservations accepted by:
>  FAX (510/643-0531) or via
>  EMAIL at alumni@haas.berkeley.edu.
>
>You may also mail your registration form below to:
>Haas School Alumni Relations Office,
>520 Student Services Bldg. #1904,
>Berkeley, CA 94720-1904.
>If you have any questions please contact the Haas School Alumni Relations
>Office:  510/ 642-7790 or email alumni@haas.berkeley.edu.


Can you let me know what current business we might be doing with BT?  Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 04:04 PM -----

	Tanya Rohauer
	02/06/2001 03:51 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Bankers Trust

still doing BT, have not seen any DB

From: Tana Jones on 02/06/2001 03:26 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bankers Trust

Are we currently doing any trading out of BT, or are we doing it all under
Deutsche Bank now?


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
04:44 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@btu.net> on 12/22/2000 03:40:27 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg122500.pdf


Welcome to Enron Center South. As you have probably already noticed, things look a little different here. We wanted to orientate you to your new environment and inform you about the future technology coming on-line in the coming weeks.

Occupancy Guidebook To Enron Center South
You will find this handy guide on your desk; it contains information concerning the enhanced printer environment, the new easy access keyboards and telephony procedures.

NEC Monitors
The NEC monitors have an internal anti-glare screen to help reduce eye strain and eliminate the need to install an additional screen cover.  Additionally, an integrated speaker has been installed on one monitor for each desk.

Turret Users
An "Alliance MX turret quick reference guide" has been placed on your desk; this includes important information about the new features such as "Caller ID" and "Voicemail Indication".

Increased Information Access
There are many NEC 50" Plasma screens installed on the 5th and 6th floors.  While many of these will be displaying information designed for the specific unit, others will be displaying various television channels.  The audio to these television channels can be accessed via any of your telephony equipment.  Here's how:

Ten audio channels have been set up for access from your either your Avaya telephone, Stentophon, or IPC Turret.  The channels have been defined on Page 15 of your Turret.  To access the audio from either your Avaya or Stentophon, simply dial the extensions shown in the table below:

Channel	Avaya	Stentophon
Weather Channel	12401	801
CNN Headlines News	12402	802
CNN Financial News	12403	803
CNBC	12404	804
MSNBC	12405	805
Bloomberg	12406	806
Financial News Network	12407	807
CNN	12408	808
Fox Sports	12409	809
ESPN1	12410	810

Wireless Telephony
You may notice the cellular phone coverage is not consistent across the floor, and some areas have virtually no coverage at all.  We are implementing a multi-network "in-building" system to provide consistent high quality service for the campus, keeping you in touch while you are on the move.

Wireless LAN
The infrastructure to support Wireless LAN technology is in place and is being tested. We will be implementing multi level encryption and security to keep our intellectual property safe from eavesdroppers or hackers.

Amtel Replacement
As a move to provide a more flexible "Plug n Play" environment and to help with the reduced desk footprint, we have replaced the Amtel message boxes with Microsoft Exchange Instant Messaging. The Global Messaging Team is testing additional software products to provide some of the features not available with Exchange Instant Messaging; these include one-touch response keys, external LED display, and printing.  Updates will be provided as they become available.

Keeping an Open forum
We will keep you informed of the changes and developments as the migration to the building continues, please feel free to respond with any comments, queries or suggestions to  mailto:Enron.Center.South.Technology@enron.com


Nick Lampson called and asked for a contribution.  I committed to one without
knowing about his vote on PNTR.  I will keep my word by making an individual
contribution but will also communicate to him that in my capacity as Enron
PAC chair i cannot authorize the PAC to make a contribution as a result of
that vote.

Sorry I jumped the gun.


I have already moved someone from ERCOT to SE Power.   We are set.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Sat 2/2/2002 10:55 AM
To: Lavorato, John; Whalley, Greg; Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:
Subject: Marcello Romano

Marcello is coming to Houston tomorrow to interview for a position trading financial gas.  I really think if we have any spare trading slots we should talk to him.  Kevin - what about South East power?

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Please see attached a brief overview of the current legal framework for the
control of NOx emissions in the EU as well as changes under preparation.
Please note that the two EU directives which govern the current regime of NOx
emmissions abatement plan on the pan-European level only set the minimum
requirements. Nothing precludes Member States setting tighter limits on
emissions when implementing these Directives into their national legislation.


Jeff, as you may know we are conducting due diligence on 11 california QF's
that El Paso Merchant Energy purchased from Dynegy on Feb 1 of this year.  we
are considering the purchase of 50% of El Paso's interest.  In discussions
with Paul he suggested that I get you involved with the transaction.  Two
things come to immediate attention.

I heard that the PUC has filed suit against El Paso relative to these 11
assets.  What do you know about this ?
NOw that the CPUC is trying to implement terms of AB 1890's section 390 alot
of questions and methods are surfacing about calculations of payments to
QF's.  Are you in a postion to follow this debate and keep me informed during
the process ??

Thanks

Frank

503-464-3940


Fred,

I think Kathleen will be a big help to all of us in improving the flow of
paper.  I trust her to work up initial drafts of option agreements, subject
to my quick review and the review of local counsel.

Thanks for your cooperation.

kay

Fred Mitro@ECT
10/11/2000 10:46 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Schaeffer Property - Livingston County, Illinois

Kay:

The Fehrs and Ledfords did sign their respective option agreements last week
prior to our Zoning Board of Appeals meeting.  I am expecting Karen Way to
forward you an executed original copy of each agreement.  I will check with
her on the status of this.

With regard to the policy, I understand your point.  Rusty and I will work to
better co-ordinate with you in the future.  Perhaps we can lever off of
Kathleen for agreements such as the Schaeffer option.

Let me know.

Fred

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           10/10/2000 08:51 AM

To: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Schaeffer Property - Livingston County, Illinois

Hi Guys,

Enron policy requires that the assignment of tasks to outside counsel go
through (or at least be coordinated with) the legal department.  In the
future, please let me know what you need so that there can be some order to
the process.

Did the Fehrs and Ledfords sign the option agreements?

Thank you,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 08:47
AM ---------------------------

"Way, Karen S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com> on 10/09/2000 02:52:14 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'rusty.stevens@enron.com'" <rusty.stevens@enron.com>,
"'fred.mitro@enron.com'" <fred.mitro@enron.com>, "Gershon, Mark A. - CHI"
<Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com>, "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI"
<chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>, "Shindler, Donald A. - CHI"
<Donald.Shindler@piperrudnick.com>

Subject: Schaeffer Property - Livingston County, Illinois

Kay:

This morning, Rusty requested that we prepare an Option Agreement for the 29
acre parcel west of the Livingston Energy Center.  This property could be
used as a construction laydown site, but more importantly would provide a
sound buffer for the project.  It is our understanding that the Option
Agreement is to be presented to the property owner at some point next week.
We will forward a draft of the agreement to you no later than Monday,
October 16, 2000.  Please feel free to call me or Don Shindler
(312-368-2175) with any questions regarding the agreement.  Best regards.

Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347

____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


Richard,

We are still selling our ICAP into the short-term market.  Narsimha was
going to send me a description of how the sale to you would work so we could
get comfortable with the details of a longer term sale.  That would be the
first step in any discussion we might have.

Alan Meyer
Corporate Energy Manager
Willamette Industries, Inc.
Voice:	503-412-2009
Fax:	503-721-8624
E-mail:	AMeyer@wii.com <mailto:AMeyer@wii.com>

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Ring, Richard [mailto:Richard.Ring@enron.com]
		Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:02 PM
		To:	ameyer@wii.com
		Subject:	PJM_ICAP

		My name is Richard Ring and I work with Narsimha Misra at
Enron Energy
		Services, Inc.  Narshiha indicates that he was speaking with
you, about
		one month ago, regarding ICAP within the PJM Control Area.
If you still
		have the ICAP available please conatact  me via e-mail or by
telephone
		713.853.3561.

		Look forward to speaking with you at your convenience.

		Regards,

		Richard Ring

**********************************************************************
		This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for
the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************


We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 5/16/2001.  Copies will be given to legal and credit.


Has FERC Gone Far Enough in California?
The Federal Energy  Regulatory Commission isn't going far enough in its
attempt to reform the  California wholesale electric market, according to a
paper by three prominent  economists done for San Diego Gas and Electric. The
paper by John D. Chandley,  Scott M. Harvey, and William W. Hogan argues that
FERC should first end the  artificial separation that divides the California
Power Exchange and the  California Independent System Operator, rather than
worrying about the  governance of the two institutions.
"The change in governance may help," says  the paper - "Electricity Market
Reform in California" - "but it is not likely to  be decisive in the near
term. Explicit guidance from the commission regarding  the nature and
trajectory of reforms will be essential if market reform is to be
accomplished within an acceptable time frame." Hogan, of the Kennedy School
of  Government, has been writing since 1995 in opposition to California's
market  separation.
Also, argues the paper, freeing the California utilities to  engage in
forward contracting is no panacea. "The expectation that merely  allowing
utilities to participate in forward contracting necessarily would be  the
solution to high prices is problematic and not supported by the commission's
staff report," says the analysis, adding that "putting pressure on buyers to
sign contracts in the present environment may make things worse." If the
underlying problem in California is high cost and low capacity, requiring
forward contracting could harm not only California but also the entire
Western  U.S. electric system.
FERC's $150 so-called "soft cap" is a wild card that  has the three
economists scratching their heads. "It does not appear in the  staff report
and there is little critical analysis of their implications, other  than the
discussion of Commissioner [Curt] Hebert." If the intent of the soft  cap is
to move toward cost justification for bids above $150/MWh, then FERC is
headed into an administrative morass "that would rival those under wellhead
price controls in the natural gas industry."
If, on the other hand, the soft  cap is "truly soft" and would only require
some paper work at FERC and the  possibility of a refund if the price is
eventually deemed not just and  reasonable, "there might be little impact on
consumer prices (particularly if  the principal sources of those high prices
are high costs and regional capacity  shortages rather than the exercise of
market power). Even so, the proposal might  serve to deter entry and new
investments, thus combining the worst of both  worlds, high consumer prices
and little or no new investment."
FERC's  proposed order in California also demonstrates confusion about just
what  constitutes market power. The paper cites the proposed order's
lawyerly,  obfuscatory conclusion that "while this record does not support
findings of  specific exercises of market power, and while we are not able to
reach definite  conclusions about the actions of individual sellers, there is
clear evidence  that in California market structure and rules provide the
opportunity for  sellers to exercise market power when supply is tight and
can result in unjust  and unreasonable rates under the [Federal Power Act]."
The economists note, "In  this regard, the debate is confused because we are
dancing around the words  where the truth may be hard to face."
In the case of California, say the  economists, there is no evidence of
market power. Even the practice of  generators avoiding the day-ahead market
in favor of the real-time market "is a  response to bad market design and
pricing incentives (including price caps), but  does not demonstrate the
exercise of market power." Nor is bidding above  marginal cost necessarily an
exercise of market power, they add. "The  distinction between direct marginal
cost and opportunity cost is sometimes lost  in the discussion. Hence, a
competitive bidder whose direct cost of generation  is $40 but who could sell
the same energy outside California for $100 should bid  no less than $100.
This would not be an exercise of market power."


We will take the NGPL variances.
PL

	From:  Cathy Sprowls                           02/16/2001 01:28 PM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Liquidation Issues

The Aurora liquidation tagg is N65007.2

The NGPL variance is primarily the following:

N50101.X                   2,221.50
              N70658.3              131,316.55

NQ1900.1               (15,596.02)

Sorry, my notes were getting a little hard to follow on some of those cells.

Thanks
Cathy
---------------------- Forwarded by Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 01:23
PM ---------------------------

Phillip M Love
02/16/2001 10:27 AM
To: Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Financial Liquidation Issues

0008 Lone liquidations can you please get the tagg number for the aurora
liquidation tsf from the East
Is the NGPL purchase variance for roughly $109K part of the the N50101 - syn
storage?

 WPS liquidation NV8650.1 is a option premium that is being paid on sitara
#384296 12/00-2/01.  This liquidation needs to be seperated out to its own
line and split accordingly along the months 12/00 & 01/01 - $116,250 and 2/01
$105,000.  We should get oa forms on this deal for these months that this
liquidation will offset.
Take remaining $7K
Thanks.
PL


Sara,

FYI:	Sue Kelly was the Corporate Secretary based in the UK who handled the maintenance of the the "official minute books" for those group of Enron companies in the UK.

Susan
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:01 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Cc:	Bailey, Susan
Subject:	RE: Enron Credit Inc. Resolution

Tana:

I don't know who Sue Kelly is so you may want to handle that end.  The London lawyers don't need anything further.  Thanks.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:54 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Enron Credit Inc. Resolution

Do I need to fax a copy of this resolution to the London lawyers and Sue Kelly, or have you and Susan taken care of that?


The NEW XCam2 is a tiny, yet powerful wireless video camera that's so small it fits in the palm of your hand!  And since it's wireless you can put it anywhere.  Now you can get this Amazing Wireless Camera Kit for only $79.99 + FREE VCR COMMANDER if you order TODAY!!

http://www.sandbox.com/commerce/pub-bin/promo/6467

Here's what you can do with NEW XCam2:

- Create home videos! Capture life's moments!
- Expandable to 16+ cameras and linked together with 1 remote!
- Monitor front door visitors!
- Complete home & office surveillance!
- Supervise your children from your bedroom!
- Monitor your home via the Internet with XRay Vision (optional add-on)

DISCOUNT PRICE! Only $79.99 + Get a FREE VCR COMMANDER!
** That's amazing $170 Value - Save $90! ORDER NOW!

http://www.sandbox.com/commerce/pub-bin/promo/6467

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

MOST POPULAR DEAL ... GET A COMPLETE WHOLE HOUSE WIRELESS SURVEILLANCE KIT with SMART VCR taping!  SAVE $218

EXCLUSIVE SPECIAL! $388 Value! Now $169.99!

http://www.sandbox.com/commerce/pub-bin/promo/6467

THREE CAMERA SUPERDEAL with FREE VCR COMMANDER!  This complete wireless 3-camera kit provides incredible video surveillance for your entire home!  Manage the views of 3 tiny, wireless cameras on your TV (expandable to 16+) with the touch of a button.

SEE & RECORD ... (Whether you're home or not!)
VIEW what's going on through-out your entire home/office and RECORD ONLY the action from all your cameras on ONE VCR!

  * Use a Camera to view the walkway
  * Use a Camera to view the backyard
  * Use a Camera to view the kid's playroom
  * Use a Camera to view the kid's bedroom
  * Use a Camera to view the side of house
  * Use a Camera to view the kitchen

EXCLUSIVE DEAL - $388 Value - Now Only $169.99!!
This is a complete kit that allows you to set up 3 cameras and link them together through any TV or VCR and it allows you to record what you want, ONLY the action, whether you're home or not with the NEW VCR Commander!  Hands FREE Surveillance!

Everything you need is included -- 3 XCam2 wireless cameras, 1 remote, 1 wireless receiver, 1 transceiver, 3 addressable power supplies, 1 VCR Commander Kit (which includes Eagle Eye Motion Sensor), and all the cables!  These 3 HOT cameras are ready to go right out of the box and give you instant "Scan & VCR POWER!"

EXCLUSIVE OFFER: $169.99! SAVE $218!

http://www.sandbox.com/commerce/pub-bin/promo/6467

It's Available, Affordable, Reliable and Easy-to-Install.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

 - Click on Links in this email for more details
 - Offers Valid in US ($USD) and Canada Only
 - Offers Not Valid with Gift Certificates/Vouchers.
 - FREE Shipping for US orders over $49 (including Alaska and Hawaii); $10 for Canadian orders
 - 30 Day money back guarantee from X10.com

Thanks & Best Regards,

Brian Edwards
X10 Discount Club Manager

To unsubscribe from these types of emails, please visit:
http://sandbox.cnnsi.com/sandbox/pub-bin/u?501168877+44735442+1213


Rick,
As follow-up to our discussion of today, we would like to explain our concerns.
EEL entities are under control of an administrator - Price Waterhouse - who represents the interest of the creditors of those entities.
All decisions regarding those entities are being made by the administrator.  Michael Brown, Fernley Dyson, John Sherriff are not in the building and to the best of my knowledge have resigned all directorships.
Most of the remaining employees (300) are working for the administrator.
There are, however, interests of Enron Corp which are housed in Enron House may not be getting the attention they deserve or , potentially more concerning, are being used or eyed by the locals for their benefit.

Examples are :
1) the contractual assets in ECTRIC which include financial trades, weather derivatives, nordic energy, some crude and products trading.
2) large in the money pumped storage trade which is in a US-based LLC - in the money by a net $50MM
3) Enron Direct is being offered for sale (JV with EES)
4) The TXU VPS contracts (currently under termination dispute) is being negotiated solely by administrators and their employees

Transactions are being terminated by counterparties, deals are being cut between the administrators and commercial for the dispostion of assets, and value is being eroded because no support staff will work without a reasonable expectation of being paid.  Finally, the administrators have been here for several weeks and seem woefully prepared to take on the task at hand.

We suggest that the Houston-based 'investor' (whether that is current managment or a trustee) ought to reconstitute some form of governance over its activities in Europe so that it can be assured of receiving maximum value for its assets here.

Currently, we have little capability to cause the local staff to provide us with the information and access to make informed decisions.

Please give us a call so we can discuss a course of action, if any, you would like us to take.

Ted


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001
09:31 AM ---------------------------
From: Todd Kimberlain/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/21/2001 02:26 PM
To: Kyle Berryman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bob
Beyer/ENRON@enronXgate, Reno Casimir/ENRON@enronXgate, Huy
Dinh/ENRON@enronXgate, Partho Ghosh/ENRON@enronXgate, "Gil, Eduardo"
<Eduardo.Gil@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, D Todd Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph
Hrgovcic/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael Nguyen/ENRON@enronXgate, Timothy M
Norton/ENRON@enronXgate, Sandeep Ramachandran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudio
Ribeiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Rajib Saha/ENRON@enronXgate, Valter
Stoiani/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Tawney/ENRON@enronXgate, Gary
Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, Yannis Tzamouranis/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven
Vu/ENRON@enronXgate, Catherine Woolgar/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen
Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Todd DeCook/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andy
Pace/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Ryan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: web site

To All:

I forgot to send along the web site in my last e-mail.  Sorry about that.

Todd

http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~jelsner/www/


They tried not to show their back-ends-it was rather bazarre

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

i did hear that it was rather revealing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

no-just a real man

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:07 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

missed it - you must think i am a perve

how is the new floor

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

Did you watch the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show last week

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 7:27 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

i thought felicity was supposed to be a good girl??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:41 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

I missed half of it but it was pretty good.  Ben found out thatDFelicity cheated on him

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:04 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

how was felicity??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

probably

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

you would be so bored

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:39 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

Lucky for me that retirement is also an option

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:25 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

so - are you going to sign on with reliant or eprime or cinergy or who??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:06 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

possibly-in my old age

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:42 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

a little fiesty this morning??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:38 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

It was really good.  Next wek you can watch Jennfer Lopez-I bet you can watch her bits and pieces.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:32 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

bits and pieces - you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:00 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

Did you watch Michael Jackson yesterday?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:41 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

um yeh - - me too,  can i fit in your suitcase??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:43 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

My resume is finished and the job offers are pooring in

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

no overlap in EES - have you written yours, or are you just going to retire...

ha ha

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

you should be working on your resume

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

actually forced myself to read last night - trying to get smart

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

They have some cute guy lawyers this year-but I bet you probably watch that manly Monday night Football.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

bits and pieces - never really got into Ally

i assume you did..

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:53 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

Did you watch Ally last night?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:50 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

such a tough life

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:49 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

I saw the tv advertisement last night for Temptation Island for Thursday.  I think it may conflict with Will and Grace.  Could be a tough night.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:00 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

it looks to be on Thursdays at 8

http://www.fox.com/temptation2/home.htm

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:45 PM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

I was looking in the TV guide and did not see where it is on this week let me know if they changed the date and time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 11:49 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

um.....no....sorry - i guess he is why you are watching?

aren't there good looking boys on the island?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

Have you seen Ben on Felicity?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

i don't understand how you put Felicity on the same level at TI2...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:45 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

I am a desperate person for entertainment-what can I say.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:35 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

that is horrible - i am embarrassed for you...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:31 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

it's on the sasme night as Felicity

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:30 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

that's no fun

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	FW: How good is Temptation Island 2

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 7:46 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	How good is Temptation Island 2

I'm not sure I'm going to watch it.  None of the people really interest me


We have built two new Products Types called US Bandwidth DS3 Physical Forward
and US Bandwidth OC3 Physical Forward. Please go into DataManager and approve
these Product Types (look at attached Document).  We are going life on the
1st of May.  If you need help with the approval process contact Dale Neuner
(ext. 39746) or myself (ext. 39938). Please Do Not Reject the Product Type.
If you have questions or changes to the Product Type please contact me at
your convenience.

Thank you very much for your co-operation!

Leonardo Pacheco
ext. 39938


Mark,

I got your nice letter - hope things are going well.  I'm really looking
forward to seeing you in SF next week.  Have a safe trip.

Jeff


Mam nadzieje, ze moja odowiedz na list Sz.Pana  z dn.19.01.01 doszla do Pana.
Byl on wysylany z niepewnego  komputera.
Jezeli nie doszedl, to prosze dac znac  (elektronicznie oczywiscie).
Serdecznie pozdrawiam
Grazyna Piesniewska


Thanks for your reply Mark.  Your observation is interesting.  I had not
thought of that.  The y intercept of a linear regression can be easily set to
zero in excel.  It's one of the "trend line" options.

Have a good weekend,

Philippe


I love it.  Unfortunately, ENA would likely go bonkers since many of the folks whose deals we'd be bettering also happen to be big ENA customers.  If there's a way to finesse it (e.g., "Enron offers State big power deal for 1/2 what State contracted for"), it would really bring the house down.  But I think that ENA would get damn queasy about doing it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 11:35 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: It seems to be unraveling for Davis--Need Ron or Dan to get CPUC Filings at FERC

What if we started offering some better deals?  Save the state billions .... what do you think?

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:30 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Denne, Karen; Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard; Mara, Susan; Kaufman, Paul; Comnes, Alan; Robertson, Linda; Landwehr, Susan M.; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:	It seems to be unraveling for Davis--Need Ron or Dan to get CPUC Filings at FERC

FYI. Split between Davis and Lynch is now very public.  Davis is likely losing his mind.  Can Ron Carroll or Dan Watkiss search these filings down at FERC?  Thanks.
Best,
Jeff

State PUC seeks to void Davis's power contracts
Deals gouge consumers, agency tells federal regulators
In a move that could undermine California's hard-won control of the power market, state regulators are urging the federal government to throw out prices for some electricity contracts agreed to by Gov. Gray Davis.
The state Public Utilities Commission, in what amounts to a rearguard action against the governor's power strategy, is arguing that some of the deals gouge Californians. The PUC says energy firms probably took advantage of the state's power crisis earlier this year to charge unfairly high prices, and it wants some of those prices cut.
"The state is going to get itself into serious trouble with those contracts if they're not renegotiated," Commissioner Richard Bilas said. "I would support anything that would help us get the prices of those contracts down."
The PUC apparently did not tell Davis administration officials that it was challenging the contracts before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
"It's definitely not something that's a favorable thing to have happen to us," said Oscar Hidalgo, a spokesman for the state Department of Water Resources, which negotiated the contracts.
Hidalgo said the long-term contracts, even though more expensive than current market prices, are the bulwark that protects the state from another round of spiraling spot market prices.
"It would be a mistake to try to void those contracts out," Hidalgo said. "If that's the goal, then we're back to square one. Prices would start to creep up."
The state is paying an average of $69 a megawatt hour under the contracts it has signed with private generators. Peak prices for electricity last week were less than $30.
Hidalgo could not say whether the PUC actions could expose the state to lawsuits by the contractors or threaten a planned $12.5 billion bond issue to repay the state general fund for the power purchases.
Over the past three months, lawyers for the PUC have filed challenges on various grounds before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission against deals negotiated with PacifiCorp Power Marketing Inc., Alliance Colton LLC, Sempra Energy and a Calpine Corp. subsidiary, said PUC attorney Sean Gallagher.
SEMPRA, CALPINE CONTRACTS
Taken together, Sempra and Calpine have sold about half the electricity that the Davis administration has agreed to buy in an array of 53 agreements, some of which last 20 years. In all, California has committed to spending at least $43 billion for electricity.
The deal with PacifiCorp Power Marketing has already come under attack because while the state was negotiating the $1 billion contract, one of Davis' energy consultants owned stock in the power supplier's parent company.
Gallagher said PUC attorneys may recommend commission actions against other contracts.
Davis' spokesman Steve Maviglio said Friday the administration couldn't comment until it had studied the PUC submissions.
The PUC's challenges mark the latest battle between Davis and the five- member commission, which is resisting administration energy policies even though it is controlled by the governor's three appointees.
The commission has rebuffed Davis' attempts to nail down a mechanism for utility customers to cover the costs of the long-term power contracts and pay off the planned $12.5 billion bond issue.
STATE TREASURER'S WARNING
State Treasurer Phil Angelides warned last week that the PUC's actions threatened to delay the bond issue and leave a $9 billion hole in the state budget next year.
PUC President Loretta Lynch opposes the bond plan because it requires the commission to rubber-stamp the power contracts and forces the state to maintain a prolonged role as an energy buyer.
"We should not, through the instrument of the bonds, lock down the policy choices for the state for 15 years," Lynch said last week. "We should stay as flexible as possible.
Lynch could not be reached for comment on the commission's challenges to the contracts.
Commissioner Jeff Brown, Lynch's fellow Davis appointee, said the filings don't rule out Davis' bond financing deal. Nor do they threaten a state default on the long-term contracts, he said. But federal action could help the state improve the deals, he said.
"The state of California has never consciously defaulted on a contract," he said. "Even if we renegotiate, we'll renegotiate within the confines of the contract."
Hidalgo, however, said he doubted the state could modify the contracts. Under power granted by the Legislature, he said, the water department made its own finding that the contract prices were reasonable.
Jan Mitchell, a spokeswoman for ScottishPower, parent company of PacifiCorp Power Marketing, said both sides agreed to the contract after full negotiations.
"Now another California agency is disputing it," Mitchell said. "We obviously disagree, and we'll continue to work with FERC, making sure the contracts are honored."
PUC CRITICAL OF DEALINGS
The PUC argues that the Portland energy firm wielded excessive market power when the state signed its 10-year, $1 billion deal with the company July 6. That forced the water department to accept unfair prices to avoid blackouts, the PUC says.
"News reports suggest that the (water department) paid substantially over the then-current market prices for this contract, prices which will be passed through to California retail ratepayers," the PUC said.
An energy consultant to Davis, Vikram Budhraja, admitted in August that he owned as much as $10,000 worth of Scottish Power stock while the deal was being worked out. Budhraja sold the stock July 30, and state officials said he had nothing to do with the PacifiCorp Power Marketing deal.
Uncertainty over the contracts adds to growing turmoil in the state's energy picture. While the issue has slipped from the public eye, Davis' solutions to the energy crisis are meeting resistance not only from the PUC but from fellow Democrats in the state Senate, which has refused to pass his plan to stabilize Southern California Edison's finances and stave off a second utility bankruptcy filing.
While officials fight among themselves, the energy industry is moving aggressively to reverse state efforts to put the brakes on deregulation.
***************************************************


Friday is good for lunch.  12:00 @ your choice.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Nachawati, Nabil, M" <nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Nachawati+2C+20Nabil+2C+20M+22+20+3Cnnachawa+40Central+2EUH+2EEDU+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Sunday, August 12, 2001 9:15 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: Lunch

 Dear Debra,

I want you to know that I am truly sorry for not meeting you for lunch. I
feel so bad. I am in Dallas right now visiting family. I was interviewing
for jobs in Atlanta last weekend. Anyway, I will be back in town on Thursday
of this week. Friday lunch would work great for me, just let me know. I want
you to fill me in on how you have been.

Your law clerk,

Majed Nachawati
-----Original Message-----
From: Perlingiere, Debra
To: nnachawa@Central.UH.EDU
Sent: 8/8/01 4:44 PM
Subject: Lunch

 Mr. Nemec and I were wondering when you might make a time available for
us in your impressive schedule for LUNCH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Any day but
Thursday  next week is good for me. Take care, let us know.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Would you mind setting this guy up for us to interview ASAP.  Darron, Kam,
Dave, Errol and myself.  Thanks.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001
01:24 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           03/26/2001 11:02 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Daniel J Thibaut Job ID#0000107787

Here's an Auburn boy for you.  What do you think?

Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001
11:01 AM ---------------------------
To: enajobs4@enron.com
cc: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, toni.graham@enron.com
Subject: Daniel J Thibaut Job ID#0000107787

RISK ANALYST

Dan Thibaut
Security Specialist - Information Security
Enron Broadband Services
727 North Shepherd Dr.
Houston, TX 77007
Phone (713) 293-8127


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Enron Methanol nominates the following natural gas requirements for the
Methanol Plant for February 2001:

32,000 mmbtu per day

EGPFC nominates the following natural gas requirements for the MTBE Plant at
Morgan's Point for February 2001:

6,000 mmbtu per day


<<enron breakdown  12-14 BOD.xls>>

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Hood, Stephen (NY Int)
> Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:13 AM
> To:	'Dutch.Quigley@enron.com'
> Subject:	RE: enron bod risk
>
>  << File: enron breakdown  12-12 BOD.xls >>
>
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From:	Hood, Stephen (NY Int)
> 	Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:02 AM
> 	To:	Zamora, Jim (NY Int); Earley, Dave (NY Int); Panasko, Alex
> (NY Int); Timmins, Martin (NY Int); Smith, Christopher (LDN Int); Davis,
> Kevin (LDN Int); Polk, Ira (NY Corp); Harte, Tom (NY Int); Colburn, Jim
> (NY Int)
> 	Subject:	RE: enron bod risk
>
> 	max risk ($6,188,138)
>
> 	 << File: enron advisor.pdf >>  << File: enron analyzer.pdf >>  <<
> File: enron.pdf >>
>
> 	Regards
>
>
>

 - enron breakdown  12-14 BOD.xls


Please print and fax the redlined version to me at the hotel.

Thanks,

Kay

ps  I'm in room 706
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001 07:58
AM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 02/27/2001 02:18:43 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: LLC Agreement for Turbine LLC sale

 <<2rz802!.DOC>>  <<2RZ8RED.DOC>>
Kay:

We did have a "form" LLC agreement in conjunction the letter agreement.  It
was most recently circulated in a Jan 4 e-mail from me and is the attached
draft dated Dec 15.  We may wish to tinker with the effective date
provisions of Section 2.5 and depending on whether XYZ is a corporation,
partnership or limited liability company, the entity representations in
Section 3.2.1 et seq. (I have also attached a marked copy reflecting the
differences between the prototype form and the final form signed in the
Intergen transaction).  If you need anything else, please let me know.
Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com

Enclosures 129572v2
  129344v7 R 129572v2

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 8:45 AM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com; jkeffer@kslaw.com
Subject: LLC agreement for turbine llc sale

Hi there,

Did you come up with a "form" llc agreement in conjunction with the form
letter agreement, or is the Coral LLC agreement the latest thing?

Thanks,

Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2rz802!.DOC
 - 2RZ8RED.DOC


Just heard from Matt - should only be one trade - I've killed 530557.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   02/23/2001 01:24 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: deal

Kate,

TFS just shows one trade with Matt motley, we have two entered 530551.01,
530557.01.
thanks

530263.01
Apb showed:  just ch cp to city of mcminnville > OKAY


Tana-

I work in the Tax Department with Mark Ng and I was wondering if you had the
information on which entities will be included in the ENA footnote as of
12/31/00.  If you are not the right person to contact on this matter, I
apologize for taking up your time.  Please let me know the contact on this if
possible.

Thank you,

Noveena
ext. 5-8337


check out this website

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	karimrashid <karim@karimrashid.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:59 AM
To:	everybody
Subject:	FW: DJKREEMY ON THE WHEELS OF PLASTIC

Please come Thursday night to Joes Pub. I'll spin starting at 11pm. You are all on the guest list.
Love, K
Karim Rashid Inc.
357 W 17th Street
p 212 929 8657
New York NY 10011
f 212 929 0247
www.karimrashid.com
Confidentiality Note: The information in this electronic mail message may be
confidential and for use of only the named recipient. The information may be
protected by privilege, work product immunity or other applicable law.  If
you are not the intended recipient the retention, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail
message in error please notify us immediately by telephone on +212 929 8657
or by e-mail at office@karimrashid.com -Thank you.

 - DJKREEMY on wheels of Plastic


yeah, i sort of want that orange chicken again...what do you think

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cavanaugh, Darren
Sent:	Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:40 AM
To:	Gang, Lisa
Subject:	Lunch?

What Up Gangstar?   You down to get lunch in a bit?  I am getting a little hungry, let me know.

peace,
Darren


From http://www.enerfax.com:

NATURAL GAS STORAGE REPORT

           Week                                    Prev    5
           Ending    Prev                   Prev    Year   Year
| Region | 5/25/01 | Week | Diff | % Full | Year | % Full|Average
| Prod   |  410    |  390 |  20  |  43%   |  363 |  38%  |  423
| East   |  624    |  558 |  66  |  34%   |  601 |  33%  |  627
| West   |  247    |  234 |  13  |  49%   |  310 |  61%  |  258

| Total  | 1281    | 1182 |  99  |  39%   | 1274 |  39%  | 1308

Conoco to Help Arctic Pipeline Plans

    Conocos takeover of Gulf Canada Resources should add political power to
the plans of a group of major oil companies to build a natural gas pipeline
from Canada's Arctic, according to Gulf's CEO. Conoco has offered C$12.40
per share in cash for Gulf. Gulf's partners in the study of the C$3 billion
pipeline include Imperial Oil, Shell Canada and Exxon Mobil. Gulf has an
estimated 1.3 Tcf of natural gas reserves in the region. Last week, the
group negotiated an agreement with native leaders from the Northwest
Territories that would have the Aboriginal Pipeline Group owning up to a
third of the pipeline. Debate has long centered on whether a pipeline from
northern Alaska or the Mackenzie Delta would be built first, or whether the
market could initially support both.

Looks like the race is on!  If producers and others in Alaska don't get
their act together soon, Conoco and the NWT could win.  I still don't see
how ANGTS and Mackenzie Delta Pipeline can be built simultaneously and the
Over the Top Pipeline from Prudhoe Bay to Mackenzie Delta has too many
legal, environmental, and operational obstacles.

Bob Brooks
GPCM Natural Gas Market Forecasting System
http://gpcm.rbac.com


My first choice is Carrin Patman or Bruce Oakley at Bracewell--Tel. no.
713-223-2900. My second choices are Ron Welch and Knox Nunnally at Vinson And
Elkins #713-758-2222. Lastly, Barrett Reasoner at Gibbs and Bruns
#713-650-8805. Of course if TransCanada is already a defendant, I might
recommend different counsel depending on which judge they drew. If Duane has
any questions please have him call me at 713-853-5587.

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Sharon Crawford
	01/22/2001 04:08 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: duane_alexander@transcanada.com
		 Subject: Texas Litigation Counsel

Richard, a friend of mine at TransCanada Energy is looking to retain
Houston-based litigation counsel, and was wondering who we could recommend.
He assures me that the matter does not involve an Enron entity.  Accordingly,
could you please provide me with a name and contact for litigation counsel
you would recommend at V&E, Bracewell Patterson, Andrews & Kurth or otherwise?

Many thanks,
Peter


This is the account we can begin working on now.  We need to meet (maybe you
can drop by).  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000 02:42 PM -----

	Sheila Glover
	06/08/2000 12:43 PM

		 To: sheung.tam@ms.com
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Greene/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T
Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron India LLC (Delaware Company)

Sheung,
We will be opening an account at Morgan Stanley for Enron India LLC (a
Delaware Company).  They expect to participate in an IPO on June 13th for
Nasdaq shares.
Sara will be forwarding the documentation to you.
Sheila


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 03:21
PM ---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
04/25/2001 03:11 PM
To: Miguel L Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mauricio Trejo/Enron@EnronXGate, Rudy
Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Incorrectly booked deals

Please change the following deals to the correct counterparty
NRG Power Marketing Inc.  Please do not pick NRG Energy Inc.   This CP is for
swaps only.  Power Marketing is for physical power.   Please Please Please
select the correct CP.

589885
591068
591123


Hi, Ken!

I just received a call from Chris Croom who wants to send an updated ISDA draft to Avery Dennison Corp.  Can we use the same credit, or do you want to revise it?  He said he was going to meet with the counterparty on Tuesday, so I'm sure he either wants them to get the draft before then or he will take it with him.

Thanks!

Marie
x33907


Please make note of our new Company number and your new Cost Center number
on the attached document below:

Thank you,

Irena


Just wanted to say Hi, I know  you are at work but had to share something.
About two weeks ago, we had to go to dinner at the Peabody with some business
people in town and Jeff introduced me to someone named Cam Smith.  Jeff had
told me he was from Cleveland, MS and his dad was Dr. Smith, OK I put it
together it was Bruce Orman's nephew,  Ok I feel really old NOW!!   He is
young starting out with this particular company that sells to Jeff.  Anyway,
he remembered you and said he always liked you so much.  He gave me scoop on
Bruce and Nancy about moving to Oxford, etc.  He was really nice and quite
country talking but he is married and lives somewhere north of Memphis in Tn.
    What a small world.   Just think you could be living in Oxford town with
that Postmaster!! H A! Just kidding, I would love to see you soon.  Maybe I
can visit you one day.   CT


Per our meeting, attached are the current forms of MAC Clauses.  I have added
at the end of the list, the Event of Default for change in ownership because
I know that one comes up frequently.  Also, I don't know if you want to also
suggest that the other trading groups work from our guaranty forms as well as
our LC form.

The Legal heads of each of the trading groups are:

Mark Taylor:  Financial Trading
Jeff Hodge:  Physical Gas Trading
Elizabeth Sager:  Physical Power Trading
Alan Aronowitz:  Physical Global Markets (Liquids, Plastics, Coal, Emissions
& Metals)
Julie Murray:  Physical Industrial Markets (Pulp & Paper, Steel)


The Personal Best Award (PBA) program has been renamed Personal Achievement
Award (PAA) program. The following guidelines were reviewed with Stan:

 -Eligibility - managers and above are not eligible to receive PAA awards
 -All awards require Division Head approval
 -The maximum award is $2,000
 -Awards over $2,000 maximum require Chairman approval
 -Award amounts should be based on organizational impact
 -Unspent PAA dollars can not be added to the bonus pool

Your 2000 PAA pool and year-to-date spending are as follows:

 2000 Pool Allocation $20,035
 YTD Spending  $1,500
 Balance  $18,535

A detail report of the awards processed year to date will be sent via
interoffice mail today.

Please carefully review all awards before submitting for payment and
processing.  There are limited reserve pool dollars this year.

Call me if you have any questions.

Ann


Kay, is your machine cleaned off.  I see a lot of old things.


We did want to get the road done - I'm a little unsure by what you mean about
the wood.? Is there someone we could hire to do that?

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:?? Thursday, September 28, 2000 8:16 AM
To:???? eldon@interx.net; Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com
Subject:??????? No Road?

Eldoni:

I'm assuming, since I haven't heard back, that we're going to take a pass
this time on the Dome road, and perhaps have Jeff Green do it another time?
If I'm incorrect, we'll need to get things squared away, like today.

Let me know,
Jeff


Some people said they didn't get this, so here it is again!
---------------------- Forwarded by Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron on 03/29/2001
09:04 AM ---------------------------

Amelia Alder
03/26/2001 02:12 PM
To: Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Tour de Cypress

Hi gang!  This is not the weekly training schedule note - just wanted those
of you who are riding the Tour de Cypress this weekend to know that Stephanie
Strong will not be picking up your rider packets as she did for the
Bluebonnet.  She wants to be at the Enron MS150 packet pickup at the Big-E
Cafe on Friday.

If you haven't yet registered for the Tour de Cypress, you can get more
information at http://www.bicycletexas.com/houston.htm.

More later.......


This request has been pending your approval for  11 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078756&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078756
Request Create Date : 12/7/01 5:27:01 PM
Requested For       : michelle.blaine@enron.com
Resource Name       : eConnect - VPN  Tier 2 - Full Access
Resource Type       : Applications


I have thrown together the following list of issues that people have raised
so far:

Opportunity Costs under the soft cap
$150 too low
Benchmarks for Forward contracts
Regulation of long term sales
Preemption of PUC "buy" requirement
Commission's findings concerning exercise of market power
PUC's request for protective order


Teb,  At one of the FERC meetings in January Nancy Bagot reported that the Commission did not extend the reporting requirements for sales and transportation into California.  I don't have a copy of the Order but I'm sure she could give you either a copy of the Order or the cite address.

Glen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lokey, Teb
Sent:	Monday, February 11, 2002 8:41 AM
To:	Doll, Jeanette; Lohman, TK; Brown, Elizabeth; Rapp, Bill; Hass, Glen
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	FERC Reporting Requirements for California Gas Deliveries

Today's Inside FERC has a story indicating that the report for January business, to be filed March 1, will be the last report required (unless and until something else happens)?  Has anyone seen anything official on this?


Attached is the TW weekly report for March 22, 2002.

Jan Moore
X53858


Subject: Energy Market Report - 01/24/02

Energy Market Report
Thursday, January 24, 2002

*See attached pdf file.
__________________________________________________________
Western Pre-Scheduled Firm Electricity Prices($/MWh)
January 24, 2002 for January 25 and 26, 2002

Peak(Heavy)
                   Low      Change     High     Change
NW/N. Rockies     18.50      0.00     19.75      0.75
Mid-Columbia      18.50      0.00     19.75      0.75
COB               20.75     -0.50     21.50      0.00
N. California     22.25     -0.25     23.00     -1.50
Midway/Sylmar       NA        NA        NA        NA
S. California     22.50     -0.05     23.50     -0.90
Mead              21.00      0.00     23.25      0.25
Palo Verde        20.25      1.25     22.25     -0.75
Inland SW         20.25      1.25     23.25     -0.50
4-Corners         20.25     -1.00     23.00      0.00
Central Rockies   20.00      0.50     21.50      0.50
__________________________________________________________
Off-Peak(Light)
                   Low      Change     High     Change
NW/N. Rockies     16.50      0.25     17.50      0.75
Mid-Columbia      16.50      0.25     17.50      0.75
COB               17.25      0.75     18.50      1.50
N. California     17.75      1.25     20.50      2.50
Midway/Sylmar       NA        NA        NA        NA
S. California     18.75      2.25     20.50      1.65
Mead              17.50      2.00     19.00      0.00
Palo Verde        14.50      0.50     18.75      2.50
Inland SW         14.50      0.50     19.00      0.00
4-Corners         15.00      0.25     17.75      2.25
Central Rockies   14.50      0.50     16.50      0.50
_________________________________________________________
The Return of Enron?

While some Western hubs saw spot electricity prices for the Friday/Saturday
package that were higher than those seen for Thursday power, the bulk of
transactions took place at lower levels due to reduced weekend demand.
Light load goods on the other hand were the real movers of the day thanks to
below-normal temperatures, with all Western hubs gaining ground, especially
late in the session.  "There were not a lot of off-peak offers out there
today, and we were trying to pick pieces up in order to displace some of our
more expensive gas units," said one utility trader to explain Thursday's
light load rally.  The Andersen accounting firm came under heavy fire as
former partner David Duncan refused to testify in Congress on the shredding
of documents related to the Enron collapse by invoking his Constitutional
right not to incriminate himself.  "Enron robbed the bank, Arthur Andersen
provided the getaway car and they say you were at the wheel," the
subcommittee chairman, Rep. Jim Greenwood, R-Pa., told Duncan.  Meanwhile,
top Andersen executives said that the destruction of documents being sought
by investigators was wrong and largely the fault of Duncan.  UBS-Warburg
took a step towards restarting the acquired North American energy trading
unit of Enron Corp. on Thursday.  UBS management asked all Enron employees
that had accepted offers to attend an impromptu orientation meeting in
Houston.  "Our goal is to reestablish the business," said UBS spokesman
David Walker.  "The buildup will be measured and focused on customer needs."
UBS has no intention of buying any of Enron's current trading positions,
which are in the process of being liquidated following Enron's December 2
bankruptcy filing.

Heavy load energy costs in the Northwest were as much as 75 cents higher
than levels seen for Thursday, though most deals got done at a discount to
the previous day.  Peak power at the Mid-Columbia ranged from 18.5 to
19.75$/MWh, with the weighted average coming in somewhere around 18.75$/MWh.
Light load electricity at the Mid-C gained an average of 50 cents for the
weekend package, with most players citing cold overnight temperatures as the
catalyst.  Light load energy changed hands from 16.5 to 17.5$/MWh, with
unconfirmed trades heard as high as 18.5$/MWh.  In unit news, Colstrip #3
(700 MW) remained off line for generator repairs, with no available ETR.
According to Weather Derivatives, heating demand in the region was forecast
to be 141 percent of normal through the end of the month, with the strongest
demand expected over the first three days of next week.

Heavy load energy prices softened while light load values appreciated in the
Golden State on Thursday.  "The market seemed unresponsive to factors that
normally affect it today.  Light load was really strong in the south, so
maybe someone got caught short," speculated one California player, while
another trader pointed to upcoming outages in the Southwest.  Peak power
prices at NP15 ranged from 22.25 to 23$/MWh, with shaped pieces heard at
23.5$/MWh.  Light load traded between 17.75 and 20.5$/MWh, running up as the
day progressed.  Similarly, Light load at SP15 traded from 18.75 to
20.5$/MWh, with unconfirmed deals heard as low as 16.5$/MWh early.  In
political news, PG&E will face a critical hearing on Friday in bankruptcy
court.  Judge Montali could decide whether the utility can reform into four
separate companies and if key assets like the Diablo Canyon nukes can be
transferred to one of the proposed companies outside the jurisdiction of the
CPUC.  On the generation front, Alamitos #3 (320 MW) was operating at 240 MW
on Thursday, returning to the grid from an outage that began Monday.
Etiwanda #3 (320 MW) was only operating at 20 megawatts Thursday for planned
maintenance.  Mid-state load centers were expecting high temperatures to
remain in the low-50s on Friday, while highs in the mid-60s were anticipated
in L.A.  Slight cooling was projected for the early part of the new week and
the latest six-to-ten called for below-normal temperatures from January 30
to February 3.

Light load energy costs in the Southwest gained as much as 2.5$/MWh for the
Friday/Saturday package, though some players were at a loss to explain why.
"It's cold here, but not that cold, so I'm not really sure why off-peak
prices gained so much momentum late in today's session," said one
Phoenix-based trader.  Light load goods at Palo Verde were seen as low as
14.5$/MWh first thing in the morning, then soared all the way up to
18.75$/MWh by the end of trading.  Peak power at Palo Verde ranged from
20.25 to 22.25$/MWh, with the bulk of trades taking place between 21.25 and
21.5$/MWh.  In unit news, Utah-based Bonanza (425 MW) and Arizona-based
Cholla #4 (380 MW) were off line Thursday morning, but both had returned by
the afternoon.  Utah-based Huntington #2 (455 MW), however, was down with a
tube leak.  While no ETR was available, sources were expecting a 48 to
72-hour turnaround.  Navajo #3 (750 MW) was experiencing vibration problems
on a PA fan.  The Arizona-based unit was scheduled to come down for 24 hours
of repairs beginning after Friday's evening peak.

Patrick O'Neill and Jessie Norris
_________________________________________________________

Western Generating Unit Outages

Current                            Begins          Ends          Reason
CAISO units <250/6764 total          NA             NA
planned/unplanned*
Alamitos #6/480/gas               20-Jan-02         ?            planned
Colstrip #3/700/coal              11-Jan-02         ?            repairs
Encina #4/303/gas                 12-Jan-02         ?            unplanned
Etiwanda #3/320/gas               24-Jan-02         ?      @20 MW, planned*
Etiwanda #4/320/gas               21-Jan-02         ?            planned
Four Corners #5                   09-Jan-02     14-Mar-02        maintenance
Grand Coulee #19/600/hydro        10-Dec-01       March          repairs
Haynes #6/341/gas                 07-Jan-02         ?            planned
Helms PGP #2/407/hydro            01-Oct-01         ?            planned
Huntington #2/455/coal            24-Jan-02     26-Jan-02       tube leak*
Hyatt/Thermalito/933/hydro        02-Oct-01         ?      @506 MW,
unplanned
Morro Bay #4/336/gas              21-Jan-02         ?            planned
Moss Landing #7/739/gas           29-Dec-01         ?            planned
Ormond Beach #1/725/gas           28-Dec-01         ?            planned
Ormond Beach #2/750/gas           05-Oct-01         ?      @350 MW,
unplanned
Pittsburg #6/317/gas              22-Nov-01         ?            planned
Pittsburg #7/682/gas              21-Jan-02         ?            unplanned
Scattergood #3/445/gas            22-Jan-02         ?            maintenance

Future
Navajo #2/750/coal                02-Feb-02     25-Feb-02        maintenance
Navajo #3/750/coal                25-Jan-02     26-Jan-02        repairs*

For unit owners refer to pdf version.
*Indicates a change from previous EMR.
______________________________________________________________________

Eastern Markets Pre-Scheduled Firm Power Prices ($/MWh)

January 24, 2002 for January 25, 2002

Peak (Heavy) in $/MWh
                 Low     Change   High      Change
Into Cinergy    17.50     2.00    18.50      0.60
Western PJM     21.85     0.35    22.75      0.85
Into Entergy    17.00    -0.10    17.70     -0.30
Into TVA        16.60     0.60    17.75      0.25
ERCOT           17.50     0.40    18.20      0.30
___________________________________________________________
Amid forecasts calling for cooler weather on Friday and higher gas values
early in the day, peak power prices strengthened across the Eastern
Interconnect on Thursday.  "The front-month picked up about a buck
everywhere, although it came off a little later, but that was the real news
today," commented one SERC player.  NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures were
up early, but fell in late trade.  February eased 2.8 cents to end at
2.048$/mmBtu, while March lost 0.1 cent to close at 2.09$/mmBtu.

Heavy load electricity prices climbed higher in the Mid-Atlantic on
Thursday, on cooler forecasts for Friday.  Western PJM pieces were bought
and sold between 21.85 and 22.75$/MWh.  LMPs spent most of the morning well
above 20$/MWh, but were weaker for most of the afternoon, averaging
21.2$/MWh through 15:00 EST.  Daytime highs for Friday were expected in the
cooler, although still above normal, mid-40s.  However, forecasts through
Monday called for temperatures to continue at least 11 degrees above normal
in the PJM region, and the latest six-to-ten called for above-normal
temperatures from January 30 to February 3.

With the mercury expected to drop throughout the Ohio Valley on Friday and
rumors of a unit shut late Wednesday, heavy load energy costs edged higher
in the Midwest on Thursday.  Into Cinergy day-ahead goods changed hands
between 17.5 and 18.5$/WMh.  "Cinergy opened low, but today it climbed
instead of the slow fade we've seen the last few days.  Prices went above
$18 around 8 am, bounced up and down a bit, but stayed up there," said one
relieved trader.  The February contract was heard trading between 19.7 and
20.25$/MWh, also stronger than a day ago.  According to sources, a Wisconsin
Electric unit shut late Wednesday, but information on which unit, the cause,
or ETR were not available.  Daytime highs for Friday were only expected to
reach the mid-40s, with corresponding overnight lows expected to drop into
the upper-20s.  The cold snap was anticipated to be short-lived, with
weekend and Monday forecasts putting high temperatures right back into the
upper-50s.  The most current six-to-ten predicted mostly above-normal
temperatures, with a normal front moving in from the west, from January 30
to February 3.

With continued bearish fundamentals, peak power prices rose incrementally in
the Southeast and Texas on Thursday.  Into Entergy day-ahead deals were done
from 17 t0 17.7$/MWh, while February traded around 19 to 19.1$/MWh for most
of the day, dropping off a little later to 18.9$/MWh.  Into TVA trades
followed a similar pattern, with peak power for Friday delivery averaging
17$/MWh.  SERC forecasts called for highs to fall into the upper-50s on
Friday, before rebounding into the mid-60s for the weekend and upper-60s for
Monday.  Texas temperatures were expected to linger close to normal through
Saturday, before rising into the mid-70s by Monday.  The up to the minute
six-to-ten predicted above-normal temperatures from January 30 to February
3.
___________________________________________________________

California ISO Congestion Index in $/MWh

                         Path                 Peak   Off-peak
for 25-Jan-02         NW1 to NP15             0.00     0.00
                      NW3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      AZ3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      LC1 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      SP15 to NP15            0.00     0.00

OTC Forward Peak Electricity Contracts in $/MWh

                    Mid-C              PV              SP-15
                Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask
BOM            21.00    22.00    23.75    24.75    25.00    26.00
February       18.50    20.00    22.00    23.00    23.75    24.75
March          16.00    17.50    21.50    22.50    22.75    23.75
April          16.50    18.00    22.50    23.50    NA       NA
Q2 '02         16.50    18.00    25.00    26.00    25.00    26.00
Q3 '02         30.00    31.50    38.00    39.00    37.50    38.50
Q4 '02         27.00    28.50    26.75    27.75    28.50    29.50
Q1 '03         26.50    28.00    27.50    28.50    30.00    31.00
Cal '03        29.00    30.50    31.75    32.75    33.50    34.50

Represents the most recent bid/ask spread obtainable
by the Energy Market Report.

Alberta Power Pool Index (C$/MWh)

                    Peak(14)   Peak(16)   Off-Peak    Flat     Change
for  23-Jan-02       42.15      41.51      24.51      36.31     3.03

BPA's Offer for 01/27/02 and 01/28/02.

Hours        Amount          NW delivered        COB/NOB delivered
7-22         200MW           Market Price*          Market Price*

*Market price will be determined at time of request.

NYMEX Henry Hub Gas Futures in $/mmBtu

                 Close        Change
        Feb      2.048        -0.028
        Mar      2.090         0.001

Natural Gas Spot Prices in $/mmBtu

                  Low          High
Sumas             2.01         2.06
So. Cal Border    2.09         2.14
San Juan          1.99         2.04
__________________________________________________________

Economic Insight, Inc. - 3004 SW First, Portland, Oregon 97201,
Telephone (503) 222-2425, Internet e-mail emr@econ.com -
Copyright, Economic Insight, Inc. 2002.


I agree that the current Word document approval form will not be very
practical once we scale up. Going forward, we could be looking at some kind
of database solution as implemented for EnronOnline.

TV

Bryan Seyfried
20/05/2000 13:09
To: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
ECT London Credit Trading

Subject: Re: Credit Trading - Approval Form

Although this makes a lot of sense, how are going to implement it?  We plan
to scale massively and I cannot imagine that this will be efficient enough to
facilitate the time frames and number of reference credits that we are
anticipating.  I think that we need to have a general policy that we can look
to instead of approving them on a one off basis.

Let's discuss

Tomas Valnek
19/05/2000 11:42
To: ECT London Credit Trading, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Credit Trading - Approval Form

Attached is an Approval Form that will have to be completed to request if we
want to trade with a new counterparty or on a new reference credit. I have
incorporated comments from Origination, Credit and Legal. But should you have
any further comments please let me know ASAP, as I plan to introduce this
form by the middle of next week. (Note that there will be two forms, one for
bankruptcy swaps and one for other credit derivatives.)

Regards

Tomas


You guys email addresses are too long.  I just sent and email to two AA
people.   How's the new job going??  Have they let you out of orientation
yet?

Talk to ya later,
Robin