Did that piss you off- beating on your Texas women- babe.  That would have
pissed me off.

Eric Bass@ECT
11/30/2000 10:50 AM

To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: aggie/longhorn letter

waaaaa! waaaaa! you notice that she didn't mention the corps of cadet members
that tackled and beat on women after texas victory in college station a
couple of year back

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           11/30/2000 10:36 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: aggie/longhorn letter

Something to get you ALL riled up!!  And you talk about LSU fans being bad-
"Kill him"!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 11/30/2000 10:35
AM ---------------------------

Christina Barthel
11/30/2000 09:43 AM
To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Kim Chick/HOU/EES@EES, Leon
Branom/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason Sharp/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
James Hollman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert B Cothran/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Meredith"
<meredith@friersoncpa.com>, "Zogheib, Lisa A" <Lisa_Zogheib@AIMFUNDS.COM>,
"Kelly Kohrman" <pyrowoman@hotmail.com>, "Ashley"
<Ashley.Victorick@coastalcorp.com>, "Jaimie" <Jaimie.Parker@coastalcorp.com>,
"Erin" <elaggie99@hotmail.com>, "Anthony" <urbanaj@texaco.com>, "Jose"
<jose.a.suarez@us.pwcglobal.com>, "Albert" <albert.r.ferrel@exxon.com>,
"Oscar " <oscgarcia@notes.primeco.com>, "Misti" <mkuehn@tcresidential.com>
cc:
Subject: aggie/longhorn letter

---------------------- Forwarded by Christina Barthel/HOU/EES on 11/30/2000
09:39 AM ---------------------------

Amy.Jon@enron.com on 11/30/2000 09:37:29 AM
To: Christina.Barthel@enron.com, kchick@enron.com, dflinn@enron.com,
Lynna.Kacal@enron.com, "Leigh Ann Perry" <aotleighann@hotmail.com>,
aramirez@enron.com, "Michelle" <mtram@nccol.com>, "Sponge" <CZachgo@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Are we surprised to hear this?

 "Conduct of Texas Fans at Friday's Football Game Dismays Former Student"

 November 28, 2000

 Dear Battalion and Daily Texan:

Please help me.  As a product of both Texas A&M and the University of
Texas - Austin, I thought I had learned a lot.  But I experienced some new
things at the football game this past Friday that my education had not
prepared
me for.  No doubt there are Longhorn scholars who can set me straight.  I
watched many joyful Texas fans along with a few Aggies tailgating and
carousing.  Super.  Fall football rivalry.  Spirits were literally in
abundance.  May the better football team win.

Then I saw things that I cannot really comprehend.  I saw a Longhorn fan
with a t-shirt showing a fallen-over Bonfire.  The caption read, "What's
wrong, Aggies? Can't keep it up?"  Can someone explain that to me?  I do
not get it.  I assure you, I get the sexual nuance - I just do not understand
evil.

I saw Longhorn fans mocking and taunting the fans from A&M who were in
Corps of Cadets uniforms.  "Little Hitlers," they were called.  They were
being
spat at.  Help me to understand this Longhorn slant on rivalry.  I
thought we were all against Hitler - Longhorns and Aggies.

I saw a Longhorn cheerleader - isn't he supposed to represent UT in the
finest possible way?  - run in front of the Aggie Band, turn and face it
square on and salute with the clicked heels, arm-above-head, "Heil
Hitler" sign.

What don't I know here?  What didn't I learn in history class?  All these
things happened before kickoff.

Aggies, I respect your presentation of a $50,000 endowed scholarship as a
thank-you for UT's respect and support shown last year.  That support
obviously came from the finer Horns.  I admired the fortitude and
restraint exercised by the Corps of Cadets under attack.

Unfortunately, I learned that hundreds and hundreds of Longhorns have
More than one way to show the Hook 'em Horns sign.  They prefer to use their
middle finger.  Class.  Really intelligent and creative.  That will
quickly teach those "littlest" Longhorns how to show spirit.  I just pray they
get an honest chance to choose.

I am learning.  I have attended both schools.  I will choose the higher
ground.

Susan Priest
Classes of '77 and '81
>
>


Kristina:
I will take a look at this shortly.  I am only handling the EPMI consent.  I
forwarded your message to Susan Bailey in the swaps group.  Her number is
713-853-4737.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	"Drew, Kristina" <DrewK@merchantenergy.com>
	06/07/2001 10:04 AM

		 To: "'carol.st.clair@enron.com'" <carol.st.clair@enron.com>
		 cc: "'Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com'" <Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com>, "Abba Gana,
Mustapha" <AbbaGanaM@merchantenergy.com>
		 Subject: RE: MEGA Assignment

Carol,

For your review, I've attached the adjustments our legal department is
proposing to the Consent to Assignment since receiving your red-lined
version from Rhonda Denton.  As to the transfer effective date, since we are
now into June, we would expect the transfer date to be as of July 1st.
Please let me know as soon as possible your comments on MEGA's most recent
proposed Consent to Assignment (attached below).

 <<MEGA  Assignment Consent Agreement  Version 2 RED_.doc>>

Thanks,

Kristina M. Drew
Contract Administrator
Merchant Energy Group of the Americas, Inc.
410.295.1708

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com [SMTP:Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: DrewK@merchantenergy.com
> Cc: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com; Wendy.Conwell@enron.com
> Subject: Re: MEGA Assignment
>
> Kristina, here are the proposed changes to the Assignment Consent
> Agreement.  Our attorney is Carol St. Clair .  Please respond to her (and
> copy me if via email) with your response to the proposed changes.  She
> indicated that we are negotiating an amendment to our master with Morgan
> in
> order to accommodate this assignment so we will not be executing the
> Assignment Consent Agreement until Enron and Morgan sign the amendment to
> our Master with them.   We need to know from MEGA and Morgan what the
> transfer effective date is that establishes the cutoff date for these
> trades as between ourselves and each of Morgan and MEGA.  She indicated
> that her revised draft of the Consent makes it clearer how this cutoff
> date
> works.  Carol's contact information is below.
>
> Carol St. Clair
> 713-853-3989 (Phone)
> 713-646-3393 (Fax)
> carol.st.clair@enron.com
>
> (See attached file: MEGA  Assignment Consent Agreement  Version 2.doc)(See
> attached file: MEGA  Assignment Consent Agreement  Version 2 RED.doc)
>
>  << File: MEGA  Assignment Consent Agreement  Version 2.doc >>  << File:
> MEGA  Assignment Consent Agreement  Version 2 RED.doc >>

 - MEGA  Assignment Consent Agreement  Version 2 RED_.doc


Start Date: 1/10/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011007.txt


RENTAL CARS -- JUMP START 2002 WITH SAVINGS
There are plenty of travel websites that offer low prices on rental
cars , but only one where you can set the price yourself and save even
more -- priceline.com! So come to priceline and Name Your Own Price .
You could wind up paying up to 20% less! What do you have to lose?
With priceline, you'll only rent from the top 5 names in the business
- Alamo, Avis, Budget, Hertz and National .
Plus, you choose:
* From 11 different car types
* From more than 190 airport locations
* The pick-up and drop-off dates and times
* Your price!
Choose a Compact, Full Size or Sport Utility and you'll be on the
road before you know it with money to burn!
Recently booked deals...
Name        Car/Location                 Price   Duration  SAVED!*
                                        per day
Maureen N.  Compact /Atlanta               $18     7 days    37%
Mark D.     Full-Size /Dallas-Ft. Worth    $25     6 days    32%
Scott R.    Sport Utility /Ft. Lauderdale  $35     2 days    37%
Robert W.   Compact /Orlando               $17     8 days    27%
James O.    Sport Utility /San Francisco   $36     7 days    23%
Paula R.    Full Size /Tampa               $26     12 days   37%
Lisa W.     Compact /Las Vegas             $17     3 days    23% JUMP START YOUR SAVINGS TODAY!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Special Bonus: Priceline has great deals available at the best hotels
-- right now! You choose from over 1,200 cities around the world. You
choose the price you want to pay. Priceline Hotels  -- try it today!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*Rental car offer prices per day shown do not include industry
standard taxes, fees, and surcharges or priceline's $5.95 per rental
processing fee. Savings shown are for the total cost of the rental
car through priceline when compared to the lowest published rate
available at the time of booking for the same itinerary (excluding
standard taxes, fees, and surcharges). All offers were made within
the last month. All rates are subject to change and availability and
these results are not necessarily typical.
QUESTIONS? If you have questions about these promotions or a
previous priceline request, please click here .
When you made your priceline request, you asked to receive future
updates and news on our products and services. We hope you found
this information useful. If you would like to unsubscribe from
future updates, use the link below. http://priceline1.m0.net/m/u/plt/p.asp?e=SSCOTT5%40enron.com


Debra,

My contact said on the first page of the contract he would like "cover" checked, not "spot" as it now appears.

That is the last revision requested and if you agree, it should bring this deal to closure.

sg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 5:18 PM
To:	Gillespie, Steve
Subject:	RE: Louisville Gas & Electric

Tell them to submit language they would like to see and I will review it. Have them email you and cc me.

dp

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gillespie, Steve
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:24 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: Louisville Gas & Electric

Debra,

My contact at LG&E has requested the default pricing in the contract be switched from "spot" to some type of "true-cost" verbiage.  His point was that if he is buying 10,000 on a given day from Enron and ENA only delivers 5,000 by the terms of the present contract Enron would be responsible for the "spot" cost of replacement gas or the gas daily average for that zone.  My contact points out that the market for gas when this purchase is to take place could be significantly higher (or lower) than gas daily and that is the cost they want to pay or receive.

Is something like this request possible?

sg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Gillespie, Steve
Subject:	Louisville Gas & Electric

 FYI, I have started negotiations with LG&E, however they have not resolved the issue of party name(s) on their part.   I will keep you apprised of my progress.

dp

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


ERCOT will conduct the next round of market participant training during the month of November and December. ERCOT staff from various business areas will conduct informative training sessions on selected market operations and commercial operations topics.  The sessions are designed to present an overview of the ERCOT market protocols and business processes and to lead market participants through typical applications of the protocols in the ERCOT market.  New market participants entering the market as well as support staff from existing market participants are encouraged to attend.  The topics covered are as follows:

ERCOT Market Overview
ERCOT's organizational structure
Retail Market Operations
Wholesale Market Operations Overview
Settlements and Billing (Initial Training and Refresher Training)
 Metering/Load Profiling Data Acquisition and Aggregation
Renewable Energy Credits

Please visit the ERCOT website at the link provided below for registration information for these training sessions.
<http://www.ercot.com/texaschoiceprogram/training.htm>
Space is limited and registration will be on a first come first served basis.  Additional sessions may be added if there is more demand for the scheduled training sessions than can be accommodated. Registration questions should be forwarded to the ERCOT training department at Training@ercot.com.  If you need additional assistance, please call your ERCOT client representative or e-mail the ERCOT Client Relations department at ClientRelations@ercot.com.

Ted  Hailu
Client Relations Manager
Electric Reliability Council of Texas
E-mail: Thailu@ercot.com
Telephone: (512) 248-3873


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 07:50 AM ---------------------------
To:	Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: Hunsucker's Farewell

You are the man!  Picking a bar near my house - double points for you!

Stewart

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  Chris Stokley                           04/04/2001 07:02 PM

To:	Portland West Desk
cc:
Subject:	Hunsucker's Farewell

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 07:08 PM ---------------------------

	  From:  Kourtney Nelson                           04/04/2001 07:59 AM

To:	Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject:	Hunsucker's Farewell

Please join us at the Horse Brass Pub on Thursday, April 5th, for 				Brett's Farewell!

We will be kicking off the festivities at 6:00pm and hope you all can come to wish Holly and Brett good luck on their new adventure!  Attached are directions--the address is 4534 SE Belmont Street.

<Embedded StdOleLink>


This is a good write-up by TURN on the California situation with the rate
freeze.  I have communicated with one of our attornies and Mona, that TURN's
proposal is consistent with our strategy and position.

Roger
---------------------- Forwarded by Roger Yang/SFO/EES on 10/24/2000 08:12 AM
---------------------------

"Robert Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com> on 10/18/2000 06:28:36 PM
To: Roger Yang <ryang@enron.com>, Mona Petrochko <mpetroch@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: TURN Report -- "Cooking the Books"

>
>
>TURN REPORT RELEASED
>
>"Cooking the Books -- How PG&E and SCE hide assets, artificially inflate
>their power purchase costs, and want consumers to pay for it."
>
>Attached is a copy of the report released today by The Utility Reform
>Network (TURN) at a press conference in San Francisco.  The report is in
>two parts -- the first file ("Title/TOC.pdf") contains the title page and
>table of contents.  The second part ("Cookingbooks.pdf") contains the body
>of the report.  Both files require the Adobe Acrobat reader.
>
>If you have problems with these files, please contact Matt Freedman
>(freedman@turn.org) or Raka (raka@mail.turn.org) for assistance (phone:
>415-929-8876).
>
>Matt Freedman
>Report Author // Staff Attorney
>TURN

 - Cookingbooks.pdf
 - Title_=_TOC.pdf


That's fine.  Just let me know when you want to go.  But give me a few
minutes, we're working on something.  It shouldn't take but about 10 minutes.


---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron on 06/01/2000
10:39 PM ---------------------------

Robert McGrory@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/31/2000 11:07 PM
To: Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Nicholas O'Day/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: ITC

Dear Steve,

I attach a draft paper for the purposes of Steve's presention and subsequent
submission to the ITC which address reforms in the Australian electricity
sector.

As you are probably aware, Enron Australia does not operate in the New
Zealand market and so the above report does not cover NZ as we are not really
in a position to provide useful comment on that market.  However, I was able
to locate a NZ Ministerial inquiry into the electricity industry which, if
Steve chooses to comment on NZ, may be of use to you.  A copy of that report
is attached.

Regards,
Rob.


Security Resource Line Item Request  KKER-4R3KLB has been submitted for your
processing.

To view the request, click your left mouse button on the Notes document link
below.


Shirley,

Transmission is my 1st choice.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
05/01/2001 03:11 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: The Next Transmission Roundtable

Vince:

This will make 3 appointments for 11:30 on the 9th.  #1 - V@R Lunch meeting,
#2 - This is the day that David Hernandez has requested that you have
lunch with him and the Roundtable makes #3.  What do you want to do?

Vince J Kaminski
05/01/2001 02:19 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The Next Transmission Roundtable

Please, put on my schedule.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001
02:19 PM ---------------------------

Anita DuPont@ENRON
05/01/2001 12:51 PM
To: Jean.Ryall@enron.com, Bill.Rust@enron.com, Steve.Walton@enron.com,
Ron.Tapscott@enron.com, Sevil.Yaman@enron.com, Vasant.Shanbhogue@enron.com,
Tom.Dutta@enron.com, Walter.Coffer@enron.com, vkamins@enron.com,
Lloyd.Will@enron.com, martin.lin@enron.com, Christi.l.nicolay@enron.com,
George.Hopley@enron.com, fred.mitro@enron.com, Patrick.Hanse@enron.com,
Steve.Olinde@enron.com, Madhup.Kumar@enron.com, robert.kraszewski@enron.com,
jeffrey_wilson@enron.net, john.moore@enron.com, Rmcnamar@enron.com
cc: Lance.cunningham@enron.com, shirley.crenshaw@enron.com
Subject: The Next Transmission Roundtable

The next Transmission Roundtable will be on Wednesday, May 9, 2001, from
11:30 AM to 1:00 PM in EB 49C1.  Please notify me if you CANNOT attend.  I
will send another email soon with the menu we will be serving.  Thanks.  Anita


Paul is out of the office today but I found the customer name in my notes -
it was right below all my notes on CanFibre.  The customer is Latrove Steel.
I'm going to call Peoples myself to learn how this works.  Does anyone object
to that?  I will wait until this afternoon before I call.

Heidi
Do you think the production gas can be moved to EES's pool by July 1st?  If
not, we can sell the gas to Latrove out of CES's pool for July.  However, we
will not see the fuel credit until August(???) to verify if this works or not.

Marde L Driscoll@EES
06/21/2000 08:29 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alain Diza/HOU/EES@EES, Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Peoples

Questions that I have:
1)  I am assuming that the Clinton end-user will not go into EESs' pool.  It
needs to be verified with PNG that I can do a pool to pool nomination to the
end-user (only a few stand alone customers are grandfathered to receive these
types of noms.)  This is a critical issue for EES as we are already long gas
behind the gate and we don't need more production.  If the customer can't
take my gas from my pool then I will have to bring it in via CNG which will
only make my pool longer.

2)  If the production meters are moved to EESs' pool then I would suggest
just a flat index price between ENA and EES.

3)  Will EES be supplying the full 1000/d to the end-user or just the amount
of the local production transferred to EESs' pool?

4)  If the fuel credit works the way Chris explains it below then I would be
willing to sell all of the gas at index but I will need to confirm that with
PNG.

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES@ECT, Alain Diza/HOU/EES@EES@ECT, Heidi
Griffith/DUB/EES@EES@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson
Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Peoples

1. ENA is responsible for purchases of 500 MCFD (515 DthD) Metered Prouction
from Phillips Production Company.  This volume is will be decreased  until
further notice because PNG has increased line pressures thus reducing the
production volumes to 50-60% of normal (Refer to attached schedule).  There
are 7 Phillips meters  in CES's pool beginning July 2000.  Heidi Boyd @ CES
will have to nominate the production into CES's pool and away from the pool
until the meters are moved.  EES should have 6 Phillips Production meters in
their pool beginning July 2000.

2.  See Attached Schedule for Term, Price & Volume.

Note:  PNG has increased line pressures which reduces production into the
system.  Both Phillips Production and Power Gas Marketing are claiming Force
Majeure.  Their volumes have been reduced to 50-60% of the original contractd
volume.

Chris Germany@ECT
06/20/2000 03:59 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES, Alain
Diza/HOU/EES@EES, Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES
cc: Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Peoples

Here is what I'm looking at for July 1.  Paul Leanza (Clinton) has a customer
that can take around 1,000 day.  I don't know if that's dt or mcf.  I will
use mcf for this email until someone corrects me.  This customer has a
special deal where the pool operator gets a fuel credit on every mcf the
customer pulls.  For July, assuming the gathering fuel is 5%, and this
customer pulls 95 mcf from your production pool, you will get a 5 mcf
credited back to your imbalance account the following month.  I don't know
how this works with trading imbalances.  But, at a NYMX of $3.95 that works
out to $.21 - sounds good to me.  Paul said this customer is looking for a
CNG Index Flat price or and equivalent basis number.  Marde will not sell at
that price but I will.

Marde said she would charge ENA a $.03 fee for all the volumes flowing.
Actually, I would prefer to move all the pool and production gas to EES,
settle up financially with EES and be done with it.  What we could do to test
Paul's statement, is have the customer pull 300 mcf/day out of CES's pool for
July.  It would be easy to see since that is the only deal.   AND, have EES
take over the pool deal with Power Gas Marketing.  Comments / Questions?

Questions
John
1.  Heidi (EES) said you already have some Phillips production in EES's
pool.  Does CES still have metered production from Phillips in CES's pool?
If yes, how many meters?

2.  Please give me the following info for the activity behind Peoples
  Phillips   Power Gas Marketing
Term
Price
Volume

Heidi (EES)
If we find out from John that there is still metered production in CES's
pool, please call Peoples and see if we can move the metered production to
EES's pool for July.  Heidi Boyd with CES said you could tell them that CES
is going out of business and they may make exceptions for that.

Marde
I would prefer to move both supply customers over to EES, where EES makes the
payments and bills either Clinton or Clinton's customer.  At what price will
you take these deals?  I assume we need to get this info from John before you
can anwser this.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000 02:51
PM ---------------------------

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           06/19/2000 01:52 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Peoples

As of today, Power Gas Marketing volume has decreased from 7,500 per month to
4,000 per month, until further notice, due to Peoples regulating the volume
of production into their system.

Phillips Production is also down..

For July, I would sell 4, 000 per month supplied by Power Gas Marketing (pool
to pool), and 300 MCFD x 1.03 = 309 Dth/day metered production from Phillips
Production.  The Phillips Production meters are in CES's pool.  It will cost
$100 per transaction to do a pool to pool transfer.  If Paul Leanza can use
the gas through November, we should move the Phillips meters to his pool
(309/Day).  The Power Gas volumes go through October.

John


Please be advised that the company's trading policy prohibits any Enron
employee from trading any products that the company trades.

	Roger Gahunia/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/05/2001 10:04 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PLEASE READ

Tana,
;
I have a commodity futures account at A.G. Edwards, but there are currently
no positions in the account.; I do not think that will change;any time in the
foreseeable future.
;
Roger Gahunia
;

-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON;on behalf of;Mark Taylor (Vice
President and General Counsel)@ENRON
Sent: Tue 6/5/2001 6:42 PM
To: NYMEX Hedge Exemption List@ENRON
Cc:
Subject: PLEASE READ

To:;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;
Department:; ;; ENA Legal

From:;; ;;;;;;; Mark Taylor;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; Date:;; May
11, 2001

;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; Vice President and General Counsel

Subject:;;;;;;; Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.; These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related
commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person
pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


Just a friendly reminder of the December 13th 4th quarter forecast meeting has been canceled.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	McCarty, Danny; Harris, Steven; Hayes, Robert; Neubauer, Dave; Hotte, Steve; Cordes, Bill; Lowry, Phil; Corman, Shelley; Fossum, Drew; Smith, Gary; Gadd, Eric; Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Stark, Cindy; Armstrong, Julie; Robertson, Audrey; Houser, Rita; Benner, Martha; Alder, Amelia; Winters, Ricki; Cappiello, Deborah; Kovalcik, Tammy; Wadle, Susan; Sellers, Emily; Perry, Carolyn; Campos, Kathy; Saunders, James; Gilbert, Steve; Brassfield, Morris; Concklin, Elaine; Barnes, Caroline; Keiser, John
Subject:	4th Quarter Forecast Meetings Canceled

The 4th quarter forecast meetings with Stan scheduled for Tuesday, November 13 at 1:30 and Thursday, December 13 at 1:30 have been canceled.  Rod and I will meet with Stan separately.

Thanks

Tracy


Daren,

Should I change the counterparty on this sale, or is that handled by
marketing?  Also, we may need to look at changing the Storage Agmt.   Please
advise.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 12/14/2000 07:26
AM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers@ECT
12/13/2000 05:12 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Has the volumes for the deal below been nomd' yet under the new deal.  Credit
is having a cow because they are showing exposure still under Cannon.  Is
there a way that we can get this done tomorrow?

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 05:05
PM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 05:03 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           12/12/2000 03:29 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Julie,

Cannon is not a wellhead producer.  The meters below are assigned to the
following individuals:

Meter #  Scheduler

68  Mary Poorman
4132  Jackie Young
1040  Aimee Lannou
1606  Mary Poorman

These schedulers should be advised of the changes.

Bob

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 01:49 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

New deal 529753.

Robert, please do your magic.

Kris, I'm not sure who in your group this should go to, this is a sale.

Julie

Brant Reves
12/11/2000 12:24 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: cannon assignment

The trades below were originally executed between HPL and Cannon Interests
Houston per terms of a specific Master Physical Agreement.  After recieving
back executed documentation, we are ready to have the trades offically moved
within the various Enron capuring systems from Cannon to Kinder Morgan Texas
Pipeline, Inc. per the terms and conditions of the recently executed Master
Physical Agreement between HPL and Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, Inc.

First, here are the TAG Nos. of the trades we wish to have assigned.

NU2813
NA0376

Second, several trades are listed within a ERMS book called:  P A M
These trades show a 12-31-00 expiry and their Nos. are:

522284
830689
892696
904035
904276

I am not sure what these numbers are.  But, could you move them as well.

Thanks for your help.

brant


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
01:58 PM ---------------------------

Diane H Cook
12/12/2000 03:10 PM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: final again

I promise this is the final file:


Hi Jeff Your comments  most appreciated...if you are very short of time  just
comment on what you think  is missing -- wrong --    or   unbelievable   !!!
thanks  so  much... Margaret


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
12:09 PM ---------------------------
To: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Gas Transaction Confirmation

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Sean Breen" <sbreen@czn.com>                           01/11/2001
11:26 AM

To: "Chris Foster" <cfoster@enron.com>
cc: "Art Gelber" <agelber@gelbercorp.com>
Subject: Gas Transaction Confirmation

I understand that your system for disseminating  confirmations of gas
transactions relies on use of?a single address/fax  number.? In order to
accommodate Citizens' recordkeeping processes in this  regard, please fax
confirmations of?Flexible Pricing transactions  to:
??? Sean Breen
??? Citizens Arizona Gas  Division
????c/o Gelber & Associates
??? 1010 Lamar St, Suite  540
??? Houston, TX?  77002
??? FAX:???  713.655.1623
?
Personnel at Gelber & Associates will ensure  that the document is forwarded
to me for signature and return to Enron.?  Thank you for your cooperation in
this matter.? Please call if you have  questions.


Mr. Oxley, as head of Human Resources for Enron North America, I would really appreciate your assistance.  I have met with various HR reps during my nearly eight-year tenure with Enron to understand the qualifications required for an administrative assistant to move into an exempt role.  From those meetings, however, I received severely conflicting information and left with a feeling that there are no rules, or that the rules are made and changed from person to person.  That being said, does HR follow a set of rules that are standard for all non-exempt promotions to exempt roles?  In addition, are qualifications to meet those standards changed with each individual?  Your assistance would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you.

La Donna
x34379


That's cool.  Elizabeth Soto actually was able to get me the tickets I
needed. I was trying to cover the bases.  Thanks for trying.  How is
everything else going?  Good I hope.
PL


As a follow-up to my voice mail, attached is a copy of the one page Overview
that I forwarded to Mark Palmer, Mark Koenig, Mark Metts and Mitch Taylor
providing an overview of the Application that we are planning on filing with
the SEC tomorrow.  The attachment is in Power Point.

Because the Application will be filed via Edgar, it will be publicly
available and thus the reason for alerting Mark Palmer and Mark Koenig.

Joe Sutton approved the filing yesterday, and I am waiting to hear back from
Jim Derrick that  Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling have approved making the filing.
As soon as I get a "green light," I will make the filing.

Mark Metts and Mitch Taylor will use the Overview to orally brief Sierra
Pacific.  The important point for Sierra Pacific is that the Application is
being made by Enron for legitimate business purposes unrelated to the PGE
sale, and will not affect the PGE application.  In this regard, we have
expressly indicated in the Application that the PGE application should take
priority and not delay the PGE transaction, and we will visit with SEC Staff
to confirm this treatment.  In any event, the SEC would request us to
identify which application should take priority, and given the fact that the
Application would become moot following a sale of PGE (and at which time we
would withdraw the Application), the SEC should concur.

Please call me if you have any questions.  I also previously prepared a
longer presentation for other members of our management and can provide this
to you if you need further information.

Regards,
Robert


---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT on
06/27/2000 04:01 PM ---------------------------
From: Andy Chen on 06/23/2000 04:03 PM
To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Set of Graphs

per our conversation


We are happy to lead the negotiations on this matter, but would really value your support.

We will keep you informed of progress and hopefully meet NYMEX together in the short term.

Thanks
Mike


Looks like NatWest's cross-complaint against Farallon's fund managers may
hold up at the pleading stage.? See below.

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Bhalla, Sabina
Sent:?? Friday, September 22, 2000 12:03 PM
To:???? Howard, Steve
Subject:??????? Farallon Demurrer hearing

This morning I attended the hearing on Cross-Defendants demurrer to Natwest's
Cross-Complaint.? The judge permitted extensive oral argument from Bruce
MacLoed representing Farallon and Oaktree, and Jim Wines representing
Natwest.?

Judge Berle was extremely active in asking questions to each party.? He was
primarily concerned with the relationship between the fund managers and
Oaktree and Farallon, and whether that was a fiduciary relationship, and if
so, what level of fiduciary duty was owed (he seemed inclined to leave this
issue for summary judgment).? The Cross-Defendants argued that if this suit
was to go forward, it would create a disincentive for fund managers to report
fraud, since the? fund managers may ultimately be personally liable.?

Judge Berle asked Natwest if this was more of an affirmative defense instead
of a cross claim, which was being used to diminish Plaintiffs complaint.?
Natwest stated that the fiduciaries were liable for not investigating.?
Farallon/Oaktree admitted that it has imputed any negligence and actual
knowledge from the fund managers to itself, and that Defendants are entitled
to an offset.? Interestingly, Plaintiffs stated that the fund managers were
damaged themselves, since they did not receive a bonus etc.??

The Judge seemed inclined to permit a demurrer to the contribution cause of
action, since Natwest did not really defend that cause of action separate
from the indemnity action.?

Natwest pointed to a case Platt v. Coldwell Banker 217 Cal. App.3d 1439,
which Natwest claimed, allows the fund managers to be sued independently.? A
cross action is permitted if the Plaintiffs could have brought the same
claims against the fund managers, and Natwest argued that the Plaintiffs
could have brought such a claim.? Finally, Natwest said it would be
prejudiced if it could not "point the finger" at the highly paid investement
manager.? According to the Platt case, a nonparty witness is very different
than a potential indemnitor who is sitting at the table at trial.??

???
The judge said his ruling would occur before Oct. 10.? Legg Mason
Cross-Defendants have until that time to file a response to the
cross-complaint (that was what the ex parte application was about).

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


Jay:

The first annex is ENA; the ECC annex is similar.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


The report named: West Power Desk Daily Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=24&report_name=West+Power+Desk+Daily+Position+Report&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=12/26/2001>, published as of 12/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Thanks!   I need to put a Master in place as there are trades out  in  excess
of  6 months with GTC's.  Please send me a credit sheet for this company.

Thanks,
DP


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
05:20 PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
11/13/2000 04:59 PM
To: Jennifer Baer <jbaer1@maine.rr.com>, "Amanda Barnard"
<ajbarnard@houston.rr.com>, Pam B Boxx/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bythewood
<rbwood@ix.netcom.com>, "Bythewood, Richard" <rbythewood@txi.com>, "derek
campbell" <derek.campbell@paslode.com>, PMDESMAR@earthlink.net, Linda J
Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, maxnbev@wesnet.com (Max Fledderjohann), "garynkay"
<GARYWGARRETT@email.msn.com>, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT,
kristi.giron@cfisd.net, "Keeling, Ingelisa" <ikeeling@velaw.com>, "B. Kenne"
<yona_edoda@yahoo.com> @ ENRON, "Ray Vincent" <raylvincent@hotmail.com> @
ENRON, Mark Troyer <mtroyer@swbell.net>, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Wilson
<gxwilson@us.oracle.com>, Jason Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ed Zajicek
<e.zajicek@pentasafe.com>, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Does the Electoral College work?

---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------
From: Sheri Thomas on 11/13/2000 04:48 PM
To: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: Does the Electoral College work?

wow...kind of says it all, doesn't it?
ST
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 04:46
PM ---------------------------

<Jennifer_Lamprecht@oxy.com> on 11/13/2000 02:25:42 PM
To: Chis.Gales@Compaq.com, jeff_chapman@mentorg.com,
rwalls@lgl.ci.houston.tx.us, sheri.thomas@enron.com, tkuyken@enron.com,
Derek_Hawkins@oxy.com, Ian_Johnston@oxy.com, Jerry_Lanier@oxy.com,
Jim_Lipka@oxy.com, Gail_Rudloff@oxy.com, Gordon_Wilkinson@oxy.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Does the Electoral College work?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tripp, Tracey [mailto:Tracey.Tripp@ENRON.com]
<mailto:[mailto:Tracey.Tripp@ENRON.com]>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 1:24 PM
To: CandMSERV (E-mail); Hank Tripp (E-mail); Heather Beken (E-mail);
Jennifer Lamprecht (E-mail); Judy Tripp (E-mail); Kara Babers (E-mail);
Megan Butler (E-mail); Randy Hounsel (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Does the Electoral College work?

 <<county total.jpg>> How scary!
<<county total.jpg>>
Regards,
Tracey Tripp
Enron Global Messaging
713.853.1606

 - county total.jpg


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 02:35 PM -----

	"Carol Hudson" <carol@iepa.com> 07/27/2001 02:18 PM Please respond to carol 	   To: "Bob Escalante \(E-mail\)" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Jack Pigott \(E-mail\)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "John G. Larrea \(E-mail\)" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "Kate Castillo \(E-mail\)" <CCastillo@RioBravo-GM.com>, "'Mike Jines'" <mjines@reliant.com>, "Nam Nguyen \(E-mail\)" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Roger Pelote \(E-mail\)" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Scott Sadler \(E-mail\)" <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, "'Sheryl Gussett'" <sgussett@reliant.com>, "Thomas R. McMorrow \(E-mail\)" <tmcmorrow@manatt.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka \(E-mail\)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Woods \(E-mail\)'" <billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery \(E-mail\)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob Gates \(E-mail\)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Carolyn A Baker \(E-mail\)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Charles Linthicum \(E-mail\)" <charles.linthicum@powersrc.com>, "'Cody Carter \(E-mail\)'" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton \(E-mail\)'" <Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Curtis Kebler \(E-mail\)'" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin \(E-mail\)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Douglas Kerner \(E-mail\)'" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "'Duane Nelsen \(E-mail\)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo \(E-mail\)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "'Eileen Koch \(E-mail\)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman \(E-mail\)'" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa \(E-mail\)'" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "'Greg Blue \(E-mail\)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Hap Boyd \(E-mail\)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack \(E-mail\)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim Willey \(E-mail\)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco \(E-mail\)'" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout \(E-mail\)" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall \(E-mail\)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd \(E-mail\)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman \(E-mail\)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett \(E-mail\)'" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Kent Palmerton'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky \(E-mail\)'" <lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "Mark Fillinger \(E-mail\)" <mark.fillinger@enron.com>, "Marty McFadden \(E-mail\)" <mmcfadden@covantaenergy.com>, "Paul Desrochers \(E-mail\)" <nevedap@msn.com>, "Paula Soos \(E-mail\)" <PSoos@CovantaEnergy.com>, "'Randy Hickok \(E-mail\)'" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "'Ross Ain \(E-mail\)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>, "'Stephanie Newell \(E-mail\)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Steve Iliff \(E-mail\)" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder \(E-mail\)'" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)'" <smara@enron.com>, "Tony Wetzel \(E-mail\)" <tonywetzel@home.com>, "William Carlson \(E-mail\)" <wcarlson@wm.com>, "William Hall \(E-mail\)" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Carol Hudson \(E-mail\)" <carol@iepa.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Sandra Moseley \(E-mail\)" <sandra@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <steven@iepa.com>  cc:   Subject: FW: IEP Legislative Report (07/26/01)

Dear All,

Attached is this week's legislative report for IEP.

Despite the summer break, leaders in the Assembly planned to call back their
side of the Legislature to debate and vote on a "rescue" plan for Southern
California Edison. The new effort was outlined in our Tuesday fax to each of
you.  In short, the new plan called for amending SB 78xx and AB 82xx to,
among other things, provide for a dedicated rate component to support a $2.9
billion bond financing by Edison, but would have prevented Edison from using
the funds to pay generators, PX and ISO invoices, directly or indirectly.
The $2.9 billion could be used to pay QFs.  The dedicated rate component for
repayment of the bonds would apply to all consumers for two years, and then
apply solely to non-core customers.  Additionally, under the plan, the 30%
haircut/trust account concept was deleted, the decision on a transmission
line purchase was deferred to settlement discussions between the state and
Edison, the RPS targeted a 10% growth in new generating capacity through
2010, and direct access would be permitted under certain circumstances
effective no earlier than January 1, 2002.  The Assembly leadership planned
on holding an informational meeting on the new plan on Thursday, July 26 and
committee and floor votes on the plan today, Friday, July 27.  However, the
leadership could not garner enough votes for this new plan this week, so no
informational hearing was held, nor will any votes be held today.  Even if
this new plan had been approved by the Assembly this week, Senator Burton's
office made it very clear that Senator Burton had no intention of bringing
his house back in to session to vote on the measure.  Accordingly, barring
the governor calling the legislature back into session, we do not expect any
other activity on this new plan before the legislature reconvenes on August
20, and perhaps not then either.

Other events this week include:

*	In Thursday's Los Angeles Times, S. David Freeman -- Governor Davis'
primary negotiator on the long-term contract deals -- authored an editorial
arguing that the state's long-term energy contracts were a primary factor in
the recent reduction in energy prices on the spot market.  You can find the
article at www.latimes.com.  It ran on the editorial page on Thursday, July
26.

*	It is our understanding that on Thursday Senator Byron Sher had
draft amendments prepared by his staff to amend SB 532 to address Renewable
Portfolio Standards issues.  The amendments are not yet public, but we are
hopeful that we will be able to obtain them when his staff returns next
week.  We will keep you apprised.

*	FERC ordered hearings on Wednesday to determine how much money
electric generators owe California for wholesale power overcharges.  With
California still insisting that it is owed $8.9 billion by generators, the
expected FERC decision on the refund amount is certain to fall short of the
state's expectations.  Lawsuits are expected to follow issuance of the
decision.  In a press statement earlier this week, the governor stated his
hopes that California will receive all $8.9 billion adding, "As for the
energy profiteers and pirates, let me make clear that I will not rest until
every dollar gouged from California businesses and residents returns to
California. If the FERC does not make California whole, we will see you in
court."

*	U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham unveiled a plan on Monday that
would expand California's power grid along Path 15 by attracting private
investment to cover the $300 million project.  He hopes by increasing the
transmission capacity by 1,500 MWs, this plan would alleviate the
"transmission bottleneck" that has proved "simply insufficient" for power to
flow freely throughout the state during times of peak usage.

*	According to Senator Dunn, Morgan Stanley destroyed key documents
"years ago" relating to the purchase of California power plants despite the
financial company's repeated promises to the Senate Select Committee to
Investigate Market Manipulation that they would turn them over, as reported
on Monday.  Meanwhile, the committee continued to move forward with their
contempt proceedings against Enron and Reliant for refusing to hand over key
documents to the committee.

*	Reliant Energy sued California on Monday, claiming "just
compensation" for the state's failure to adequately pay for long-term power
contracts that the governor seized from the Power Exchange in February.  The
state claims those contracts equal about $160 million while Reliant
calculates that the same contracts are worth more than $300 million.  A
judge is expected to oversee this dispute.

Best regards,
Tom McMorrow and Mike Martinez

 <<IEPA Legislative Report.DOC>>

 - IEPA Legislative Report (5).DOC


You betchya.

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	04/11/2001 11:19 AM

		 To: "'Jeff Dasovich'" <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "Prentice @ Berkeley"
<PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers <PSellers@pacbell.net>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bring your golf clubs

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Does this request include "Contract People" or only employees?

      -----Original Message-----
     From:   Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Mark
             Taylor (Vice President and General Counsel)@ENRON
     Sent:   Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:43 PM
     To:     NYMEX Hedge Exemption List@ENRON
     Subject:  PLEASE READ

     To:                                      Department:    ENA Legal

     From:          Mark Taylor                         Date:     May 11,
     2001
               Vice President and General Counsel

     Subject:  Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

     We  are  in  the  process of preparing applications for position limit
     exemptions  for ENA's NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These
     applications   require   that  ENA  represent  whether  its  officers,
     employees, owners, or agents have a power of attorney, control or have
     a financial interest in any related commodity future(s) account either
     individually  or  acting  with  another  person pursuant to express or
     implied agreement.

     Please   direct  any  responses  to  my  paralegal,  Tana  Jones,  via
     intercompany  email  or  call  her  at  (713)  853-3399  by the end of
     business  on  June 15, 2001 if you have any power of attorney, control
     or  have  a financial interest in any commodity futures account (other
     than an ENA or other trading affiliate account).

     IF  YOU  DO  NOT  HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO
     RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000
01:56 PM ---------------------------

"Piazze, Thomas" <piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu> on 08/04/2000 01:50:31 PM
To: "'shankman, jeff'" <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Final revised document. Thanks.

Jeff:  Good talking with you earlier this week and happy to hear that your
conversation with Jeff Skilling was such a positive one.  I am looking
forward to working with you, Vince and Mark Palmer in the near future to put
in place a comprehensive plan to maximize the Enron/Wharton relationship in a
number of different areas.  I also know that a number of the faculty will be
extremely pleased to learn of this news and will be quick to get the ball
rolling.

As promised, I am forwarding a document outlining all on campus sponsorship
opportunities, minus the Student Business Plan Competition, for the upcoming
School year.  Please review and pass it on the Celeste Roberts, for whom I do
not have an accurate e-mail address.  There are a number of student
conferences that you may wish to consider participating in as a means for
getting the Enron name in front of them.  Please don't hesitate to contact me
with any questions you may have or requests for additional information.

I will also contact the Career Management Office and ask that they call
Celeste to discuss career orientation panel sessions.  I know that you must
plan your schedule well in advance and will do my best to facilitate that
process.

Thanks again for all you are doing to bring our two institutions together.
It is important and makes a big difference.

Look forward to hearing from you soon.

TOM

-----Original Message-----
From: Henley, Nadina
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 9:54 AM
To: Piazze, Thomas
Subject: Final revised document. Thanks.

 <<OPPORTUNITIES.doc>>

 - OPPORTUNITIES.doc


did he go out on sat?  that would make him a real champ.


Mark:

Attached for your further handling is the draft Master Agreement between Enron Broadband Services, L.P. and Dynegy Europe.  Please do not hesitate to contact either Robbi Rossi (x57268) or Tracy Cooper (x59534) with any questions or comments.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com


Please note and inform your groups that Teresa Mihalik (5-7749) or myself (6-6363) should be the point people for any margin calls issued to EES.  We will work with Legal and Regulatory Affairs to validate rights to such calls. Additionally, we will work with Trading to validate requirement calculations.

Thank You
Molly


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
04:37 PM ---------------------------

Amitava Dhar@ENRON
04/05/2001 02:33 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Outage risk option presentation

Hi Vince,

Please take a look to see if any changes are needed.  Once you are o.k. with
it, we can send it to Greg Whalley.
-Amitava


A suggestion:

One of the most interesting books I've read recently is called "The River
Why," by David James Duncan. I believe he's from the Pacific Northwest. It's
about fishing and religion. Check it out.....if your gigantic FINANCE brain
can fit it in.

Kate


My new telephone number is (416) 221-4441, ex. 3279; fax is (416) 290-2980;
email is adadson@ngwi.com.  All the best, Aleck


The Governor cancelled the meeting at the last minute.  Apparently, he was
trying to schedule a meeting with Clinton and our meeting conflicted, so we
were bumped.  We are trying to set a new time.  I will share with the
Governor's energy advisor the information and recommendations all of you
helped put together.  Thanks


Larry and Joe,

Is there any additional moral pressure that we can put on Westinghouse to get
the resources needed to expedite the resolution of the Gleason 501FD issues
and the vibration issues at Wheatland?  The phone call by Larry to GE has
made a world of difference.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000
08:18 PM ---------------------------

Gavin Gaul@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/17/2000 03:01 PM
To: Mark Dobler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike J
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey@ECT,
Robert P Virgo@ECT, Bill Fox/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis
Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Gleason Blade Ring Schedule

Mark,

We have been working diligently with Westinghouse to get a schedule for the
removal and modification of the blade rings at Gleason.  I requested
Westinghouse begin to prepare for this work on Sunday after you confirmed
that we could no longer tolerate the operating restriction being added to the
unit.  Based on discussions with Westinghouse on Sunday, we estimated that
the work could be completed in 14 days.  The site began disassembly of unit
#2 on Monday.  Unit #1 disassembly began on Tuesday because we had to wait
for the unit to cool down.

The first verbal schedule from Westinghouse was received Monday night.  It
showed the blade rings being machined in series at a single shop and resulted
in the lasy unit being delayed about 4 days.  I told Westinghouse this would
not be acceptable and that the blade rings needed to be machined in
parallel.  Westinghouse agreed and has made a second shop available.  Another
schedule was published yesterday afternoon that required an additional step
in the disassembly that I felt was not required and added a day to the
duration.  Westinghouse suggested that we remove the compressor blades from
the rotor before we remove the blade rings.  I have since concluded that
removing the rotor blades first is in fact the correct procedure.

As we discussed at the meeting this morning, this schedule for the blade
rings, which has been at the site since last night,  will be distributed to
everyone today.  In addition, the site will incorporate the remaining startup
activities and issue an integrated schedule tonight.

As we discussed at the meeting this morning, it is very unlikely that Gleason
#1 and #2 can be available by June 1.  Our optimistic estimate from the
meeting this morning was June 4-7.

Gavin

To: John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gavin
Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey@ECT, Robert P Virgo@ECT, Bill
Fox/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Gleason Blade Ring Schedule

John/Gavin -

We have made progress over the last week in getting GE attention focused on
the emissions problems at Lincoln.  After 6 days of daily conferences on the
subject, GE has arrived in force at Lincoln, with the personnel and resources
required to address the problem.  We are not out of the woods yet, but I
believe everything is now being done that can be done to get as many machines
available as possible by June 1.

Enron needs the same focus from Westinghouse, on  issues currently plagueing
Wheatland and Gleason.  Unlike Lincoln, where the machines are capable of
producing MW's, these two sites have units that cannot operate.  Namely,
vibration issues on units 1 and 2 at Wheatland and compressor blade ring
issues on units 1 and 2 at Gleason.

ENA has been requesting since Monday this week, a definitve and complete
schedule from EECC, showing the disassembly, shipping, machining, reassembly
and testing of units 1 and 2 blade rings at Gleason.  We still do not have
this schedule.  Furthermore, it would appear that after this morning's
meeting, there is some confusion on what work actually needs to be performed
in order to accomplish this task and what impact that may have on the 14-day
schedule committed to ENA by Gavin Gaul on 5/15.  I am not sure whether the
communication breakdown is between business units at Westinghouse or between
Enron and Westinghouse, but a schedule and plan is the first step towards
getting the work done and we are two days into the work.  I am expecting this
plan to be circulated today.

Lastly, although we have been verbally assured by Westinghouse that there
will be no operating restrictions, other than routine borescope inspections
during off-peak periods, OEC would be more comfortable getting this in
writing.  We are requesting a formal notice from Westinghouse, identifying
any operational restrictions (post-blade ring repair) on these units.

If there is any assistance you require, please do not hesitate to request
it.  We collectively have 14 days to declare all 15 units ready for
commercial operation.

MSD


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

Thank you for your order.

You bought 10 JNPR May 80 Call at 0.250000.

ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: N-600-AABF-8088
Order entered at:                      14:28:35 on 05/08/01
Order processing began at:             14:28:36
Order executed at:                     14:28:41 on 05/08/01

ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 14:28:42 on 05/08/01
Your position in JNPR May 80 Call is 35 contracts
Your real cash total is $4,065.18

You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.

Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number.


Gentlemen,

TurboPark closed today, effective tomorrow upon funding.

Thanks for


Yes - I've added it.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/08/2001 12:28 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: fee

538871 should there be a fee on this trade?

thanks!


Here is the information to the questions regarding WPS.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000
05:43 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Golden@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/09/2000 05:38 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: wps

Ben

Question 1

Case 1 at 20F and 60% RH CTG would have net unit output of 46,726 kW at a
heat rate of 10,183 Btu/kWhr HHV new & clean
Case 2 at 90F and 54% RH CTG would have net unit output of 43,220 kW at a
heat rate of 10,804 Btu/kWhr HHV new & clean

Case 1 has gas compression, no chilling/heating, Case 2 has gas compression
and chilling. Both cases include simple cycle CTG aux and expected steup
transformer losses. Back pressure is based on 14" HRSG.

Question 2

For case 2, Sprint water injection is 1915 lb/hr +/1 20%, we are also water
injecting for NOx control 21,981 lb/hr so total is 23,896 lb/hr. Currently
cannot Sprint with DLE combustor.

Bruce

Benjamin Rogers@ECT
05/09/2000 03:24 PM
To: Bruce Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: wps

Hey Bruce,
Oscar and I are looking to have the first 2 questions answered.  If you could
look at these and get back with me that would be great.  I'm working on the
3rd question now.  Thanks
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000
03:21 PM ---------------------------

Oscar Dalton
05/09/2000 03:09 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: wps

Ben,

On the Wisconsin Public Service deal (WPS) please consider the following:

1.  One LM-6000 to be sited near Green Bay Wisconsin
2.  Will be configured in combined cycle mode with a HRSG
3.  100% of the output will go to an industrial customer of WPS

Key Questions

1.  What is the heat rate and Mw rating of our turbine at site conditions (20
degrees winter and 90 degrees summer)

2.  What is the water consumption with Sprint verses water injection

3.  What is a 10 year fixed gas price at chicago starting 6/1/01 on a
baseload volume of 10,000 mmbtu/d


that is the saddest story i ever heard.  my security guard girlfriend work at
night as a tow truck lady and she probably got pissed when she saw me hanging
out with you guys and towed your car.  actually i don't think the game is
going to play until 8:30.  here are your tasks for next week while i am out
of town:
 1. plan your party
 2. get music
 3. get food
 4. get booze
 5. invite some people
 6.  let me know what i owe you

sounds good.  if the game comes on at 6 and we go to two rows i will let you
know.  is your old ass boyfriend coming to the party?


how is the morgage company going to know you took out additional funds?
second , is the fed-ex guy going to leave the envelope with the
office?.......if it's fed ex it's already been delivered.....


I would like to take the following days in February as vacation days:

February 3,4,18

Please let me know if this presents a conflict.  Thanks.  Sara


Debbie,
I spoke with Robin, and from what we know Canada officializes one calc that
includes both their price and basis positions.  (Calc is represented by the
orange)    However, Risktrac only recognizes the book id to which it assigns
the post id. (It appears that it is only the PRC book that comes through, the
BAS book is represented by the red "x", however it is in the same calc.).
Since the Canadian post id only includes two books ids,  the Benchmark group
manually assign the same post id to the basis book, that way both books get
picked up.

Does this help?

Frank


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
05:56 PM ---------------------------

"Webmaster@cera.com" <webmaster on 09/28/2000 01:57:57 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: CERA Web Call Replay Now Available - September 28, 2000

**********************************************************************
Power Crisis in California: Reregulation or Redesign?
(CERA Web Call Replay September 28, 2000)
**********************************************************************

Authors: North American Power Team, Western Energy Team
E-Mail Category: Multimedia
Product Lines: North American Power, Western Energy

URL:
For North American Power clients:?
http://eprofile.cera.com/client/nap/media.cfm
For Western Energy clients:? http://eprofile.cera.com/client/ce/media.cfm

In a September 11, 2000, CERA multimedia conference call and web
presentation, Larry Makovich, CERA Senior Director, Mike Zenker, CERA
Director, and Peter Moritzburke, CERA Associate discuss:

Power Crisis in California: Reregulation or Redesign?
* Tracing the problem: Structural flaws and strong fundamentals
* Possible paths for California
* Lessons learned and implications for other markets

To view and listen to a replay of this presentation,
please click on the link above.

**end**
*******************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://www.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html

Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Hi Michelle,
I received in today's mail a notice from the 127th District Court that the
Alonzo Williams case will be dismissed for want of prosecution unless we
file a sworn motion to retain, or motion for default judgment, before
November 2. We talked much earlier in the year about this, and I realize
that people have much larger priorities, but I never heard what the business
client wanted to do on this one. Can we have a conference call or meeting to
resolve this before the end of the month? Let me know your preference.
Best regards,
Bill Ogden
713-844-3001


Sheila Glover has requested that David Vitrella be designated as a second
"Authorized Trader" for the Enron Communications Investments Corp. account
which was recently opened with Morgan (having as its purpose the sale of
Rhythms stock).  The rationale for a second trader is not new to us:  in John
Greene's absence, no one is authorized to trade in that account.  It is my
understanding that the only activity to occur in this account is the sale of
this particular stock which will be "dribbled in" periodically.  Please let
me know if you have any questions.  Both Donna and Sheila are very familiar
with this transaction.  Sara


Jason,

I need your help on 2 EASY things -

1)  I have been discussing fixed price baseload gas for United Technologies @ PG&E City Gate for June 2003 through July 2006.  United Technologies is a subsidiary of United Airlines.  What do I need to get from them to satisfy your credit requirments?  And once we get that, I would like to send them a Master Draft to be prepared to transact when/if the time comes.

2)  THIS IS REAL DEAL:  Merced Irrigation District.  They are looking to purchase gas, 2040/d, at PG&E City Gate for March 03 through Dec 2005.  I gave them an indication of $3.85.  I also am having structuring price up a blend and extend to blend the gas we sold to them Mar 01 - Feb 03 @ $7.85.  Where are we with respect to credit with them and what would credit require in order to do either one of these deals?  They were concerned about what credit would require.

Please let me know as soon as possible!  I haven't bugged you much lately and I don't want to go to credit jail!

Thanks,

Kim


Agenda:
1) Review Tactical Achievements / Issues / Questions
Unify tactical performance status
Sybase / infrastructure upgrade
Performance monitoring / tuning team
Middle tier mass draft invoice process
Status of Unify functional enhancements / projects currently in process
Status of DCAF functional enhancements / projects currently in process
2) Strategic Unify Performance Project - Next Phase Kick Off
Findings from Research Projects and Scope Analysis Projects
Recommendations
High level timeline and deliverable expectations
Planning for user input and participation
Strategic implications
Questions / Answers
3) Brief overview of DCAF achievements and plans going forward


We in TW- Planning would like to schedule a meeting with you to discuss !): the current CAS operations 2): ways to improve the efficiency/ speed of  the system.

Please select one of the following schedules:

Tuesday	Jan-29:	9-10:30 am
or
Wednesday:	Jan-30:	1:30 pm to 3 pm

Regards,
Mansoor
Location: my office


This e-mail is kind of funny.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 09/05/2000
09:18 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
08/21/2000 12:58 PM
To: Shelly Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter
S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Vikas Dwivedi

Shelly,

I shall not accept anybody for a rotation without a prior interview.

Li was scheduled to meet with me last Thursday but  she never showed
up. She did not call to cancel or to apologize for not showing up.
I have not seen her resume.

Please, assume she is not rotating into my group till further notice.

Vince

	From:  Shelly Butler                           08/18/2000 03:37 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vikas Dwivedi

Jeff,

Just wanted to confirm that Li will be placed in Vince Kaminski's group.
Vikas has been placed in ENA Middle Market reporting to Craig Breslau.
Please contact me at 3-4584 if you have any questions.  Thanks for your help!!

Shelly

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           08/18/2000 03:18 PM

To: Shelly Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject:

Shelly,

Hunter spoke with Li today and agrees that her first rotation should be in
Vince's group doing modelling, etc.  This will give her the broadest
experience for a first rotation.  I'm sure the other person in question,
Vikas, will do very well in Hunter's group.

Thanks for your help.

Jeff


Good Morning,

Here are this week's stats:

AGA Last Year       +106
5 yr AVG                       +87
Lifetime High            +106 2001
Lifetime Low                        +64         2000
Gas in STGE EIA                 1974
5yr AVG             1567
+/- to 2001              +471
+/- to 5yr AVG           +407
Please have your estimates in by 2:00 (1:00 CST) Wednesday.  Thank you.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic29546.pcx)

This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.


>  > I Picked you!
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > My instructions were to send this to four people that I wanted God to
>  bless,
>  > and I picked you. Please pass this to four people you want to be
blessed
>  as
>  > well as the person who sent it to you. This prayer is powerful and
there
>  is
>  > nothing attached, please do not break this pattern; prayer is one of
the
>  > best gifts we receive. There is no cost but a lot of rewards, let's
>  continue
>  > to pray for one another. God bless you, and have a nice day!
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > "Father, I ask you to bless my friends, relatives, and email buddies
>  reading
>  > this right now. Show them a new revelation of your love and power. Holy
>  > Spirit, I ask you to minister to their spirit at this very moment.
Where
>  > there is pain, give them your peace and mercy. Where there is self
doubt,
>  > release a renewed confidence through your grace, In Jesus precious
Name.
>  > "Amen"
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > "I know God would never give me something that I could not handle. I
just
>  > wish he didn't trust me so much."
>  >
>  > Mother Theresa
>  >
>  > "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
>  > "Many people will walk in and out of your life, but only true friends
will
>  > leave footprints in your heart."   ~ Eleanor Roosevelt ~
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>

_______________________________________________________
Say Bye to Slow Internet!
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html


Dear Judge Biren:

 Transwestern Pipeline Company will be offering the following exhibits:

 1.  Prepared Direct Testimony of Jeffery C. Fawcett on Behalf of
Transwestern Pipeline Company in Support of the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement (Exhibit 12, incorporating Exhibit JCF-1) and

 2.  Prepared Rebuttal Testimony of Jeffery C. Fawcett on Behalf of
Transwestern Pipeline Company in Support of the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement (Exhibit 17).

 Transwestern estimates it will need less than 10 minutes for direct
testimony.  Transwestern does not at this time intend to cross-examine any
witnesses; however, it reserves the right to request a reasonable amount of
time to examine witnesses on issues affecting Transwestern to the extent that
any party's live testimony differs from or conflicts with its prepared
testimony.

Susan Scott
Transwestern Pipeline Company
(713) 853-0596
susan.scott@enron.com


Critical Migration Information:

1. Your scheduled Outlook Migration Date is THE EVENING OF : May 17th
2. You need to press the "Save My Data" button (only once) to send us your
pre-migration information.
3. You must be connected to the network before you press the button.
4. If a POP-UP BOX appears, prompting you to "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"
please  select TRUST SIGNER.
5. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal or calendar
after you click on the button will need to be manually re-added into Outlook
after you have been migrated.
6. Clicking this button does not complete your migration to Outlook. Your
migration will be completed  the evening of your migration date.

    Failure to click on the button means you WILL NOT get your Calendar,
Contacts, Journal and ToDo information imported into Outlook the day of your
migration and could result in up to a 2 week delay to restore this
information.

If you encounter any errors please contact the resolution center @
713-853-1411


Stan would like to offer out the following Rockets' tickets (4 tickets per
game) for preferably business first, then personal use:

Saturday, December 16, @ 7:30PM VS Denver Nuggets
Thursday, December 21, @ 7:30PM VS Los Angeles Lakers
Wednesday, December 27, @ 7:30PM VS Seattle Supersonics
Saturday, January 6, @ 7:30PM VS Utah Jazz
Tuesday, January 16, @ 7:00PM VS Toronto Raptors
Wednesday, January 24, @ 7:30PM VS Philadelphia 76ers
Friday, January 26, @ 7:30PM VS Vancouver Grizzlies

These tickets will be distributed on a first come, first served basis.

Cindy


Some issues are to be addressed in other proceedings and not litigated in the
GRC2. PG&E must remove all portions of its filed testimony that are to be
addressed in other proceedings.

Advice Letter Filing:
Applicability of Schedule ED through the rate freeze, pre existing Economic
Development Rate Schedule terminated in Dec. 1998

Post Transition Ratemaking Proceeding (PTR):
PG&E's proposals in the GRC2 WILL NOT supersede revenue allocation and rate
design proposals in the PTR
PTR issues are:
Allocation and rate design of CTCs.
Ratemaking issues related to the RRB memorandum account, PPP and Nuc.
Decommissioning.

Revenue Cycle Services (RCS):
All RCS ratemaking issues will be litigated in the RCS proceeding.

GRC2:
Schedule EB (post transition economic development rate schedule)
Bypass Charges
VBU
Rate design for distribution

GRC2 Schedule Highlights
The schedule is contingent upon the issuance of a final decision in GRC. PG&E
is also schedule to provide models and comparison exhibits.
     Scenario 1  Scenario 2
GRC1 final decision   12/2  12/16
ORA testimony    1/7  1/25
Intervenors Testimony   2/14  3/4
Rebuttal - all parties   3/6  3/24
Hearings    3/20 to 3/31 4/10 to 4/14
     4/10 to 4/14 4/25 to 5/5
PD     8/2000  8/2000        Decision    Fall 200  Fall 2000


Also might add that it conflicts directly with and is likely to thwart Gov's
efforts to dramatically reduce demand this summer and avoid rolling black
outs.  Seems like legislators would benefit from more information, along the
lines of the points that Harry makes, to better understand that this bill
would only add to the problems.

Best,
Jeff

	Harry Kingerski
	03/06/2001 05:00 PM

		 To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, mday@gmssr.com
		 cc: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Comments on SBX143

Regarding proposed rate freeze for large SDG&E customers at 6.5 cents:

Adds to DWR's burden of covering the net short positions without any further
clarification of how shortfall will be funded.  The incentive these customers
now have to participate in DA and thereby remove burden from DWR is removed.

Creates incentives to increase usage and decrease conservation, exactly at
the time that just the opposite effect is desired.  Rate at frozen level
removes all price signal effect in unregulated market.

These are customers who under existing law already have had choice, as an
alternative to paying market price,  of 1) voluntarily opting in to a one
year 6.5 cent rate freeze, with a true-up, or 2) buying commodity and risk
management products in the competitive market, as many of them have already
done, and 3) reducing usage to save money.  This bill takes takes away the
last two choices/incentives.

Adopting "rates by proxy" (in a sense, indexed to PG&E and SCE rates) creates
the potential for a regulatory nightmare.

As an alternative, the Legislature should consider extending the voluntary
opt-in program under existing law.  This would preserve existing protection,
keep choices available to customers, and not unduly add to DWR's burden.

As another alternative, we could be a lot more willing to accept this IF the
"end of the rate freeze" date in (f) were specified to occur no earlier than
the date new rates are put in place (the proposed language from 18X,
remember?) and it were clear that existing DA contracts were not overturned
by this Act.


Attached elow the artical is the Resolution
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 08/17/2000
11:48 AM ---------------------------

<E._Jesus_Arredondo@calpx.com> on 08/17/2000 11:41:33 AM
To: bgaillar@enron.com
cc:
Subject: 2nd try...PX bid cap resolution RESOLUTION

Please keep in mind, until the FERC responds, there will be no changes to our
markets.

               (See attached file: resolution bid caps august 16.doc)

Also FYI:

Dow Jones Newswires

CalPX To Ask FERC To Reduce Day-of, Day-Ahead Price Cap:
Board Caves In To Political Pressure

By Jason Leopold

LOS ANGELES--The California Power Exchange, the spot market where electricity
is
bought and sold in the state, approved a measure Wednesday seeking federal
authority to impose a
$350 per megawatt-hour bid cap on wholesale power prices in its day-of and
day-ahead markets.

Members of the CalPX's board of governors admitted that the measure was
approved
 as a result of
intense political pressure being placed on the board by state lawmakers and
Gov.
 Gray Davis.

"Not approving this is political suicide," said CalPX board member Carolyn
Keherein, who also serves
on the board of governors at the California Independent System Operator.
"We're
not changing
anything but the perception in the market."

The CalPX current cap on wholesale power prices in the day-of and day-ahead
market is set at $2,500,
but that is only a technical limitation of their computer system and has had
no
effect on power prices.

State lawmakers believe a price cap would stabilize high power prices being
passed on to retail
customers, most notably consumers in San Diego. Ratepayers there are paying
market-based rates for
electricity and have seen their utility bills nearly triple in the past two
months.

The price cap would need to be approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission before it goes
into effect at the Power Exchange. FERC has not indicated whether it would OK
the measure, but said
it would investigate it.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me directly.

-eja

E. Jesus Arredondo
Manager, Corporate Communications
California Power Exchange
Tel.  626.537.3155

 - resolution bid caps august 16.doc


Tom checked with APB and they recognize the trade. Are they not checking out
correctly in the back office?

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/18/2001 01:58 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 499360

should this deal be with apb or another broker?


Hello,

Thank you in advance for taking the time to review Zach's resume for
potential opportunities at Enron.? I appreciate your offer to identify if
there are areas within Enron that could utilize his technical, business and
project implementation skills.

Zach has worked the past 4 years as a technical consultant in our Customer
Relationship Management practice of Deloitte Consulting.? His experience
demonstrates a broad range of technical and business expertise working for
clients such as the State of California, Puget Sound Energy and Kaiser
Permanente.? Zach also played an integral role in the international
e-commerce project based in Switzerland.

Zach is interested in finding a position which will enable him to leverage
his technical skills in a business role for a company.? His contact
information is listed on his resume if you feel as though his skills would
meet the needs of a division within Enron.

Thank you again for your time,

Andrea Crump
# 404-631-2062 - work
# 713-859-7850 - cell
# 916-772-1624 - home

Attachment: Zach Streight.pdf (resume)

 <<Zach Streight.pdf>>

 - Zach Streight.pdf


Mark,

Please prepare a term sheet which can be used as a Indicative Proposal for
our potential first Day Rate transaction.

The key issues other than call premium that need to be clarified are the
"posting language" and the determination period.

We will (if we reach agreement) be purchasing a series of calls and Chiles
Offshore LLC or Seacor Smit, Inc. (the entity which is currently the majority
owner of Chiles Offshore, LLC - but after the Chiles IPO, their interest will
be lowered to around 25%) will be selling the calls.

The Strike Price will be at a Day Rate of  US$70,000/day

The volume will be One (1) Rig * Day (rig multiplied times day).

Determination Period:  Jan 1, 2001 through Mar 31, 2001

Floating Price:  We need two sets of language here - to let the customer
choose from.

 a.   The floating price will be the Median of the High/Low of Day Rates for
Gulf Of Mexico, Jackups "Over 300' - C", as posted in the first printing of
the month of the Offshore Data Services, Offshore Rig Locator, page entitled
"Competitive Offshore Rig Day Rates",   (Mark, the day rates listed in the
June 2000 posting will be applied to each day of the preceding month (May
2000)).

or:

 b. The floating price will be the Median of the High/Low of the Day Rate
Range ($) for the Rigtype listed as JU-Over 300'-IC as posted each Friday of
the month.   (Mark, the price listed on Friday the 7th, will be for the first
7 days of the month)

I need to send this out Friday (tomorrow) afternoon.  As we discussed, we
need to include language that identifies that this is not definitive and
needs Enron Corp's board approval before becoming a deal.

I will carry a copy of the posting to your office before I leave this
evening.

John


Yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:47 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Furniture

Louise,
Do you anticipate needing one more set of OOC executive furnishings or will 2 satisfy us?

Thanks,
TRS


i actually started writing this on thursday.  got distracted and left late
morning to go to Vail.  Apparently I missed a little craziness.  My point on
v/x is that forward spreads, months 3/4 and back, don't necessarily trade on
value, they trade on drawing a forward curve that makes equilibrium between
hedging and spec demand.  Look at k/m... do you think k cash will average 3
cents above m.  i don't really see that scenario.  yet that's what it is
worth because the market says jv is worth $x and to get there k/m=3.  The
same argument applies to v/x.  i think this summer will be exceptionally
strong as we try to inject 2 bcf/d more gas than last year.  But cal 2 will
lag the move.  It's the main thing customers are selling right now because
every equity analyst and even Pira are telling their customers that cal 2
will average 3.50.  so either the v/x and x/z spreads come in or f/g g/h h/j
blow out.  After this winter, who in there right mind wants to buy f/g or g/h
again.  my thought is that the primary juice will be h/j but v/x and x/z will
be under some pressure.  i'm a seller at 9 and buyer at 5-6.  Not much in it
either way though.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 01/31/2001 04:47:22 PM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: v/x

you got me wrong-i wanna sell oct buy nov forward. look-two scenarios med
longer
term. we inject like mad early summer-economy stays crappy the frot of the
curve
gets slaughtered.-oct/nov goes to 3 cts sometime between now and end sep
   scenario 2-they dont enject what they want-oct /nov wil stay tite between
say
3-and 10 cts like this year but man after this winter they will panic at some
point and buy the hell out of the winter strip and blow out oct /nov to 30 cts
cuz they panic. to me if that one was to ever backwardate it was this
summer-low
low stx and injections and they still blew out cuz they panicked about
winter-as
we see this winter now for good reason..?? capeche? i thinkit a win win

 you still in the damn mar/apr-i only sold a little prenumber-cant beleive how
this got killed after-what changed?? from 1:30 to 2:05

John.Arnold@enron.com on 01/31/2001 05:41:45 PM

To:   Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: v/x

quit pressuring them    i want to sell some too.  actually sold a few at 9
on the close

slafontaine@globalp.com on 01/31/2001 12:40:07 PM

To:   John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: v/x

i hate hate that sprd-at 8 cts i think its such a good bearsprd-hope it
keeps
coming in. ill tell you why later


That looks like them. Here's the rates(demand Charges)

68915-$5.171
68916-$5.18
68917-$5.1807
68918-$5.171
69148-$5.171
69149-$5.18

You also had 1,600/d on your 10/19 capacity email (Toledo to Sandusky)
Contract#?; should be at $5.171.


I will -- fyi, I am expecting today or tomorrow an explanation from Billy
Lemmons on my involvement in formulation of the business plan; am awaiting
this before I revise the agenda.  If I don't hear from Billy by tomorrow
morning I will send a revised agenda at that time -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	02/14/2001 10:41 AM

		 To: Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001

Bob:  Could you please forward changes to the Ag section to Kaye?  Thanks.
Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 10:40 AM -----

	Alan Aronowitz
	02/13/2001 06:51 PM

		 To: Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, Wayne
Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Rahul Saxena/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Legal Temp 3/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001

Please provide to me by e-mail by Thursday of this week your suggested
changes to the January 2001 Monthly Report, so that we can issue the February
2001Monthly Report by the end of this week. Thanks for your attention to this
matter.

Regards, Alan


remember how i whipped that sharks ass with the  billy club?  That's how my
day has started.  me being the shark.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 6:12 PM
To:	Dietrich, Janet
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Govt Affairs Org Chart

Janet --

Here is the org chart that captures our discussions.  I think that this org and the # of people is the lowest level that can even try to meet the combined needs of ENA and EES.

Total headcount = 21.  The personnel cost = $6.4 MM (total for ENA and EES).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Jim


_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
Try a better way to rent-FREE! Rent DVDs online - No late fees, free
shipping and no hidden charges. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://psstt.com/1/c/62072/44846/167316/167316

AOL users click here
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

   Word of the Day for Tuesday April 9, 2002:

   quondam \KWAHN-duhm; KWAHN-dam\, adjective:
   Having been formerly; former; sometime.

     A  quondam flower child, she spent seven years at the Royal
     College  of  Art,  before  becoming a lecturer at Edinburgh
     School of Art.
     --"Interview:   Cool,   calm   collector,"  [1]Independent,
     December 13, 1997

     For  the  unregenerate  "peasant"... had gone there with
     the   successful   glass   distributor,   shrewd  investor,
     versatile talker, and quondam [2]bon vivant whose motto was
     "The best is good enough for me."
     --Ted Solotaroff, [3]Truth Comes in Blows: A Memoir

     There  was  an  exception  to  this in the form of Mrs Edna
     Parsons,  a  formidable  Englishwoman who had once been the
     Prince's  nanny  and now served as proctor, supervising his
     behaviour.  She  was  about  fifty  and true to her quondam
     profession, she could be quite strict.
     --David Freeman, [4]One of Us
     _________________________________________________________

   Quondam  comes  from the Latin quondam, "formerly," from quom,
   "when."

References

   1. http://www.independent.co.uk/www/
   2. http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=bon%20vivant
   3. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393320502/lexico
   4. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/078670490X/ref%3Dnosim/lexico

_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

You are currently subscribed to Dictionary.com Word of the Day as:
matt.motley@enron.com

To subscribe to the list by email, send a blank message to:
join-WordoftheDay@lists.lexico.com

To unsubscribe via email, send a blank message to:
leave-wordoftheday-357530C@lists.lexico.com

Subscriptions can be turned on and off from the Web at
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/list/

Dictionary.com Word of the Day
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/
(C) 2002 by Lexico Publishing Group, LLC.


Yes, close will take priority.  That is a free time job.  Thanks for the
update.

	From:  Dana Davis @ ECT                           02/06/2001 11:49 AM

To: Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Question

Is it OK that I let entries take priority over those documents that you
wanted me to hole punch and place in binders for you?  I thought I could do
it for sure today and I still might be able too but I want to make sure that
I don't fall behind on the entries.  Is that OK?  Oh yeah, Brad and Lisa Kang
had me working on projects for them Friday and Monday.


John Vinson
1338 Wingwood Place
Shelton, WA 98584-4026
kazumtv@juno.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

John Vinson


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/16/2001
09:11 AM ---------------------------

Alberto Levy
04/16/2001 08:58 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Jose LNG Background

Rick,
Thanks for the message. Sorry for not getting back to you before. Easter is a
holiday in Venezuela and we got two days off.

I am certainly involved in the domestic portion of the project, lobbying and
educating Venezuelan authorities on its benefits in particular, and the
benefits of an open and transparent market in general. I am working closely
with Emilio Vicens and Guido Caranti who are leading the development of the
project. The three of us have written extensive comments to regulations, have
met on several opportunities with the regulator and with the Ministry of
Energy and Mines (MEM), making significant progress on this front, such as
allowing to create a working group to study the project in detail. The actual
creation is still pending, but we will bring this issue during a meeting
scheduled this week.

Politics surrounding this project are complicated. PDVSA has traditionally
imposed its views on MEM, who rubberstamped all its decisions. With the
Chavez Administration, things have changed dramatically, almost paralizing
every PDVSA initiative. Since PDVSA is the one that really needs to obtain
the permit to supply the gas, PDVSA was "in charge" of dealing with MEM.
Given this environment, and once the commercial terms with PDVSA were in
place, Enron decided (of course, with PDVSA's approval) to be proactive,
starting a demonstration tour of the project to capture MEM's and the
regulator's interests.

Moreover, the initiative to involve the USG started with a conversation that
Joe Hillings and I had during the GA meeting at the Woodlands. He requested a
one pager summarizing the project to be presented to the USG for its
inclusion in Bush's agenda, during the meeting that Chavez and Bush would
have during the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas Summit in Canada this
month. Lisa Yoho got involved later, and then Tom Briggs and his DC team. I
participated in the drafting of a previous document to the one you attached.

The US embassy has been informed, but perhaps kept on the side because we are
affraid that its involvement might backfire. The relationsahip between the
USG and Venezuela have been antagonistic due to OPEC's policies, and the
political leftist leaning of the Chavez Administration. We are selling this
project as a Venezuelan project, that will advance Venezuelan interests (more
than US interests), and so far has worked. I don't mean that the effort to
include this project in Bush's agenda will have the same fate, because the US
Embassy deals at lower levels and the message doesn't get to Chavez, who is
the real sponsor of the project. Lower levels, except people at PDVSA-Gas,
are in a neutral to slight opposition stance (recent changes in MEM and PDVSA
might have aligned these interests).

I hope this background info helped understand the dynamics associated with
the Jose LNG project. Please feel free to let me know if you need additional
information. My best regards,
ALF

Richard Shapiro
04/12/2001 11:01 AM
To: Alberto Levy/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Jose LNG Background

How involved are you on this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001
11:00 AM ---------------------------
Jonathan Whitehead   04/12/2001 09:59 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Emilio Vicens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Guido
Caranti/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Jose LNG Background

Please find attached a brief outline of the Jose LNG project. Eric will call
later this afternoon to discuss.

Thanks,
Jonathan


Dear Mr. Buy:

We have the pleasure of inviting you to participate as a speaker in an upcoming conference given by The Economist. Attached you will find the formal invitation and a preliminary draft of the programme agenda. Here are some key facts for your reference:

Conference Title:  Global Risk Management Summit
Date/Location:      March 7, 2002;  New York City
Topics:                   All of the critical issues surrounding: business continuity/business resumption planning; the long-term capacity for handling risk transfer; the integration of market and credit risk; the implementation of a vertical enterprise risk framework; the management and mitigation of brand, country, human capital and cyber risk.
Delegates profile:   CROs, CFOs, CIOs, treasurers and controllers, heads/directors/officers of risk management and business continuity, senior financial executives, systems providers and consultants serving the risk management industry
Attendance:           100+

I kindly ask that you get back to us at your earliest convenience. In the meantime, please feel free to contact me at 212-541-0552 if you have any questions or if you would like any additional information.

Sincerely,
Melissa Magley

_______________________________
Melissa L. Magley
Senior Conference Manager, Americas
Economist Conferences
Tel: (212) 541-0552
Fax: (212) 245-6413
Email: melissamagley@economist.com

Keep informed about our latest events
at: www.economistconferences.com