Dear Generation/Power Marketing Executive:

The following are summaries of two significant activities that occurred
Friday, December 15
  1.  Energy Secretary Richardson issuance of an emergency order.
      (Richardson's statement and FPA Section 202(c) order is posted on DOE's
Web site at:
       http://www.energy.gov/HQPress/releases00/decpr/pr00309.html )

  2.  FERC's 12/15/00 final order to fix California wholesale markets
       (FERC's Order can be viewed at
http://www.eei.org/issues/news/cal1215order.pdf)

                                  California Supplies Ordered by Richardson

o Richardson orders listed entities to supply excess power to California ISO
o Order is effective as soon as ISO certifies shortage, but ends 12/21/00,
unless extended
o Prices to be agreed to by supplier and ISO, or FERC will set rate later
o FPA emergency power authority transferred to DOE in 1977

As he said he would on December 13, U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Bill
Richardson found "an emergency exists in California by reason of the shortage
of electric energy" and issued an emergency order under section 202 (c) of
the Federal Power Act (FPA) requiring listed generators and marketers to
provide any power in excess of the needs of their firm customers to the
California ISO.  In a statement, Richardson said the threat to the
reliability of the California grid requires a long-term solution, but that in
the short-term power must keep flowing to the state to avert blackouts.

The 76 listed suppliers have 12 hours after the ISO certifies to DOE that it
has been unable to acquire adequate supplies in the market to begin providing
requested service to the ISO.  The ISO must inform each supplier subject to
the order of the amount and type of energy or services required by 9:00 PM,
Eastern Standard Time, the day before the services are needed.  The order
directs the ISO to allocate, to the extent feasible, requested services among
subject entities in proportion to each supplier's available excess power.
The order is effective immediately and will terminate at 3:00 AM, Eastern
Time, December 21, 2000, unless extended.  To continue to obtain supplies
under this emergency authority, the ISO must re-certify the shortage to DOE
headquarters every 24 hours.

The terms of the provision of electric energy and other services by suppliers
to the ISO "are to be agreed to by the parties."  If no agreement is reached,
then under the FPA's emergency authority Secretary Richardson "will
immediately prescribe the conditions of service and refer the rate issue to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a determination at a later date
by that agency in accordance with its standards and procedures, and will
prescribe by supplemental order such rates as it finds to be just and
reasonable."  The authority of FERC to set rates for power supplied under
emergency order at just and reasonable levels where the parties themselves do
not agree to a rate is explicitly included in FPA Section 202(c).  The DOE
Organization Act of 1997 transferred the emergency powers of this section
from FERC to DOE.

The 76 entities identified in the order's attachment are all the entities
that have provided power to the ISO over the last 30 days.  Those entities
are ordered "to make arrangements to generate, deliver, interchange, and
transmit electric energy when, as, and in such amounts as may be requested by
the" ISO, "acting as agent for and on behalf of Scheduling Coordinators."

[Source: DOE Secretary Richardson's December 14, 2000 statement and order;
Electric Power Daily, December 15, 2000]

             FERC De-Federalizes California Markets, Adopts Other Structural
Reforms
                  A summary of the December 15 Order and Commission Discussion

At its special meeting today, FERC unanimously approved its eagerly awaited
final order reforming the California wholesale markets, adopting the major
outlines of its November 1 proposed order and sending back to California the
responsibility for addressing state-related matters, as discussed below.  At
the same time, FERC deferred consideration of retroactive refund issues as
well as the imposition of region-wide price caps.

FERC reiterated the November 1 conclusions that under certain circumstances,
California ratepayers were subjected to unjust and unreasonable power rates
due to California's "seriously flawed" market structure and rules in
conjunction with tight demand and supply conditions throughout the West.

While all four commissioners supported the order as a consensus-based outcome
that appropriately balanced all competing interests, each commissioner
expressed reservations with particular aspects of the order.  Chairman
Hoecker and Comm. Breathitt expressed the strongest endorsement, while Comms.
Hebert and Massey laid out their positions where they believed the Commission
had either "over-reached" or not gone far enough, just as they did on
November 1, as discussed below.

Highlights of key actions:

(1) FERC adopted the November 1 proposal to eliminate, effective immediately,
the state's mandatory requirement that the state's investor-owned utilities
buy and sell electricity through the PX, and allow these utilities to
purchase electricity through forward contracts and other alternative
mechanisms to manage supply risks.  FERC terminated the PX's rate schedules
effective at the close of business on April 30, 2001.  In effect, as Chairman
Hoecker stated, the order de-federalizes 60 percent of the California
wholesale market established under the state's restructuring law, returning
ratemaking authority over company-owned generation to the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC).

(2) FERC modified the effective period of the November 1 $150/MWh "soft cap"
proposal, limiting its application through April 2001, whereupon a
"comprehensive and systematic monitoring and mitigation program which
incorporates appropriate thresholds, screen and mitigation measures" must be
in place.  In a related move, FERC ordered a technical conference early next
year to develop such a program by March 1, 2001, so that these measures can
be place by the May 1, deadline.

In a major modification, FERC revised the refund conditions to clarify that
while certain refund conditions will continue to apply, unless FERC issues
written notification to the seller that its transaction is still under
review, refund potential on a transaction will close after 60 days.

As proposed, however, supply bids in excess of $150 will be prohibited from
setting the market-clearing price for all bidders and sellers bidding above
$150/MWh will be required to report their bids to FERC on a confidential,
weekly basis and provide certain cost support.

(3) FERC adopted the November 1 proposal to require the establishment of
independent, non-stakeholder governing board for the ISO.  The ISO Governing
Board must relinquish their decision-making power and operating control to
the ISO management on January 29, 2001.  A future order will set procedures
for discussion with state representatives on the board selection process.

(4) In a major modification, FERC adopted a $74/MWh "price benchmark" for
assessing prices of five-year energy supply contracts.  This benchmark will
be used in assessing any complaints regarding justness and reasonableness of
pricing long-term contracts.

To facilitate prompt negotiation of longer term power contracts at reasonable
rates, FERC announced that it will hold a settlement conference with market
participants.

(5) FERC adopted the November 1 proposal to require market participants to
schedule 95 percent of their transactions in the day-ahead market and
instituting a penalty charge for under-scheduling (in excess of five percent
of hourly load requirements), in order to discourage over-reliance on the
real-time spot market.

(6) FERC directed the ISO and the three investor-owned utilities to file
generation interconnection standards.

(7) FERC affirmed the longer-term measures proposed in the November 1 order,
including submission of a congestion management design proposal by April 2,
2001.

(8) FERC deferred resolving key issues, including establishing new ISO board
selection procedures, developing appropriate market monitoring measures and
negotiating protective orders associated with data collection.

(9) FERC reiterated its November 1 call to California policy makers there to
resolve state issues, such as: (1) immediately implementing the availability
of day ahead markets for power purchases; (2) development of demand
responses; (3) siting of generation and transmission; and (4) assurance of
sufficient reserve requirements.

Commissioner Responses

Comm. Hebert reluctantly concurred, calling the final order a "missed
opportunity" to, among other things, send appropriate signals for new
generation siting and conservation.  Reiterating his November 1 concerns,
Hebert recounted the remedial remedies that he maintained the Commission
should and should not have adopted.  While expressing pleasure at the tone of
the order ("balanced and considerate"), the bid certainly reversal, and the
role reserved for the state in the selection of the new ISO board, Hebert
nonetheless objected to the benchmark prices established in the order, which
he maintained appeared to be unreasonably low.  Hebert faulted the Commission
for not attempting to reconcile the instant order with the November 8 order
approving the CA ISO's emergency $250/MWh "soft cap" proposal.  Hebert ended
by challenging the CPUC to do what it can to encourage utilities there to
forward contract, including easing the existing prudence review requirements.

Comm. Breathitt endorsed the Order, reiterating her support for progress
towards open and competitive markets.  She noted that the Order properly
"walked the line" by taking all of the competing interests into account,
calling it less than ideal, but a step in the right direction.  She also
concentrated her remarks on the importance of creating stability which will
be accomplished by encouraging long term contracts and the implementation of
the $150/MWh breakpoint.  Additionally she mentioned that any price below the
$74/MWh benchmark will be presumed just and reasonable.

Comm. Massey concurred, but prefaced his remarks by expressing sympathy for
California ratepayers, stating that he felt that market power had been
exercised, that prices were not just and reasonable and that the marketers
had profited too much at the expense of others in the market.  He warned
that, as he understood the legal precedents, the Federal Courts were poised
to grant cost recovery relief to the retailers which would then be passed on
to consumers.  On the positive side, he approved of the de-federalization of
60% of the market and the creation of long term contracts.  However, he
emphasized that California regulators must now take the responsibility of
creating more generation and transmission.  In the long term, Comm. Massey
hoped that solutions could be reached starting with a technical conference
and that the market would have rules more like PJM.

Finally, Comm. Massey articulated what he would have liked to have done
differently.  He stated that he disagreed with the fact that there is not
enough evidence to show that market power existed and he pointed to the
on-going investigation.  He also disagreed with the $150/MWh breakpoint,
preferring instead a hard price per generator.  The Commissioner said he
would have set the long term benchmark for only two years instead of five and
that he would have opened a section 206 investigation in the West.  Finally,
he stated that he would have liked to address the issue of refunds.

Chairman Hoecker began his comments by saying that the Commission was forced
to act  and act quickly because the stakes are so high.  He feels that it is
now time for the state regulators and markets to act.  He noted that by
shrinking the Cal PX, the responsibility is now with the CPUC to fashion the
long term contracts and that hopefully we will exit this situation with the
least amount of damage to the utilities.  In regards to suggestions for a
regional price cap, the Chairman stated that this would not work due to the
fact that the Commission has no jurisdiction over Bonneville, WAPA and the
public power producers and that there is no spot market in the Northwest.
However, he did urge Secretary Richardson to convene a conference in order to
address regional issues.  Finally, in conceptually addressing the California
situation, the Chairman stated that competition or "deregulation" did not
fail in California, but that there never was competition in California.


Attached is an updated "contact" list for UBS Warburg Energy Operations.  Please disregard prior list sent.  If your contact numbers should change, please e-mail me with your new numbers so assure accuracy of this listing.

Thank you so much,

Christina Valdez Epperson
Assistant to Sally Beck
Enron Net Works LLC
Phone - 713.853-9106
Fax     - 713.345.8100
christina.valdez@enron.com


Mario


Start Date: 4/3/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040315.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  22.77)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: TOSCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred: -462.00 / Final: -450.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  TRADING_SC: NES1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:   5.54 / Final:   4.55)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:  50.60 / Final:  42.39)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/3/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Mark asked me to put you on the list.  I send this every two weeks to Mark
and Wade.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/30/2000 04:51 PM ---------------------------

Jane Wilson
11/30/2000 11:44 AM
To: Significant Events
cc:

Subject: Significant Events

Attached are Government and Regulatory Affairs' Significant Events report for
the last fortnight in November:


thanks for the email.  i am hopefully taking off tomorrow night, but i am not
sure b/c  i am flying united.  it will be good to be home for a few days.
vegas was fun.  i went for a bachelor party.  some of my friends are starting
to fall.  i hope billie's mom is okay.  i will talk to you soon.

love matt


Mary:
Debra said that you might have some ideas as to whom I can contact.  Susan
Flynn gave me Zulie Flores' name.
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/14/2000
03:09 PM ---------------------------

Carol St Clair
04/14/2000 11:12 AM
To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Misc

Debra:
Susan Flynn mentioned that you might be able to help me out on getting some
Enron stuff for the kids that I teach Junior Achievement to at my son's
school.  I have been trying to contact someone that would be willing to give
this class some Enron freebies with no luck.  I think that Marge Nadasky was
the last person that my secretary talked to.  Do you know of anyone that can
help me out?
Carol


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/23/2001 10:36
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/23/2001 10:22:13 AM
To: "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Rick Vicens (E-mail)" <rvicens@deltapower.com>, "Gregory F. Lang
(E-mail)" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "John Staikos (E-mail)"
<johnstaikos@paulhastings.com>, "John Tisdale (E-mail)"
<jtisdale@jhancock.com>, "Jack Wallace (E-mail)" <jwallace@jhancock.com>,
"John Anderson (E-mail)" <jcsanderson@jhancock.com>, "O'BRIEN, Lisa"
<lisa.obrien@freshfields.com>, "BURKE, Ted (TDB)"
<ted.burke@freshfields.com>, "VAN DUSEN, Nicholas"
<nicholas.vandusen@freshfields.com>

Subject: Pegasus - ENA documents

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

Carolyn

We attach the following:

(a) a clean and blacklined copy of the ENA Consent, reflecting changes to
the credit documentation;
(b) a mark-up of the "no objection to forms" letter to be executed by ENA;
(c) a draft letter from the purchasers under the Note Purchase Agreement
setting out the actions to be taken by ENA post funding and agreeing not to
issue entitlement orders in respect of their security interest in the Escrow
Account if these actions are completed.

We would be grateful if you could confirm whether Citibank had any comments
on the Escrow Agreement, and whether the account will be set up for
Wednesday's funding.

Kind regards
Isabel

 - NY003701393.DOC
 - ENA LTR TO DELTA LENDER RE FORM OF AGMT1DOC.DOC
 - NY003699617.DOC
 - COMPARE001.DOC


John:

I got the e-mail last night with the tabs for the breakdown of the current 184 for Operations, inclusive of Power and Gas Logistics.  (The tabs total 184 with one Associate noted on a separate line in Power Logistics, and 183 without that Associate, so I don't know whether you are using 183 or 184 currently for the Operations total.) Taking this number to 100 in total is obviously a big change - 45.6% reduction.  At this moment, I don't know how feasible that is.  But I will work with Jeff, Stacey and Leslie to find out.

We  need some questions answered first to go through this:

1)  Who is coordinating the look at headcount reductions for Gas and Power Logistics?  Together, those groups represent 25% of the 184 headcount.  Going in, I would asssume that they would take their proportionate share of reductions - should be 21 reductions.  We need to know who we should work with to coordinate this.  Need names and weekend contact numbers.

2)  What will the overall headcount be for Netco?  What we need to know is how many gas and power traders there will be and whether or not their anticipated business scope changes.  If commercial numbers don't change and the business scope doesn't change, a 45.6% reduction is probably out of the question.

3)  Is the 100 number for Operations only a start-up number?  Could we anticipate adding staff as business ramps up, approval is obtained for physical gas business, etc.?  Or is the 100 number intended to be the total headcount for all of 2002?

4)  What are UBS' expectations for mid and back office?  What are the views from Legal and UBS on creating confirmations for EOL transactions?  There were some discussions with Leslie Reeves about not confirming certain types of transactions.  One firm, and I don't remember whether it was UBS or not, mentioned that we might not be the confirming agent on transactions, and that instead we would review third party paper prepared for confirmations.  That is a completely different activity than we normally engage in, and would make a difference in staffing - perhaps requiring more people!   We need to know those things from UBS to take a real stab at a revised number.  Should we just pool our knowledge from various discussions that have been had with UBS, or is there someone with UBS that we should be talking with this weekend to get there view of what is required?

5)  Does the internal RAC group go forward under a headcount reduction - i.e. will we be coordinating and providing information to them, or will UBS assume some of their functions?  This may impact our staffing needs.  What about consolidated risk reporting - will Stacey and Jeff simply transmit data to UBS, or Netco have to provide some consolidated risk reporting before sending info to UBS?

We may have more questions, but these are key now to get at a feasible number.

--Sally


Maureen,

This is the review.

Vince


Monthly Report Updates Due

It is time to update the Monthly Report for Mark Haedicke to send to Jim
Derrick.  Please use a hard copy of the attached April report to mark changes
for transactions as of today.

Remember to add outside counsel (the firm name) where appropriate.

Give your hard copy changes to Dina Snow by Monday morning , May 14.

Thanks!

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com


[IMAGE]
 Attention Fantasy Members! It's time to get an early start on that New Year's resolution. MVP.com is offering FREE Standard Shipping in our Fitness Shop until 1/17/02. Click here to see what we have to offer.   Save $.05 a gallon on the gas that keeps your car's engine clean. Click here  to apply online.  Win  a VIP Vegas Vacation! OR Win  $600 CASH!   Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    NFL Reports, Player Updates  [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  Jay Fiedler , QB MIA - Meximullets Updated 12/29/01 Fiedler has been added to Miami's injury report with a sore throwing elbow. He is listed as probable for Sunday's game against Atlanta, and is expected to start.  If you're desperate for a quarterback, Fiedler's matchup vs. the Falcons is a good one.   Steve McNair , QB TEN - North Blvd Nutwhackers Updated 12/29/01 McNair was excused from practice on Friday due to a family illness. He is listed as questionable for Sunday's game against Cleveland, but he's expected to start.   Larry Foster , WR DET - Free Agent Updated 12/29/01 Foster (thigh) is expected to play in Sunday's game against Chicago. However, he is far too risky to start at this point in the Fantasy season.   Bert Emanuel , WR DET - Free Agent Updated 12/29/01 Emanuel (knee) is expected to play on Sunday against Chicago. However, he's too risky to start at this point in the Fantasy Football season.   Muhsin Muhammad , WR CAR - Not So Nice Machine Updated 12/29/01 Muhammad (turf toe) will not play this week, and may miss the rest of the season. Isaac Byrd will likely start in his place again.    Seahawks , DT SEA - Free Agent Updated 12/29/01 CB Shawn Springs, who was suspended for the past four games, will not start on Sunday against San Diego. He may play a reserve role, however, but his playing time will likely be limited.   Todd Bouman , QB MIN - Meximullets Updated 12/29/01 Bouman will miss Sunday's game against Green Bay due to a thumb injury. Spergon Wynn will start in his place.   Spergon Wynn , QB MIN - Free Agent Updated 12/29/01 Wynn will start Sunday's game against the Green Bay Packers in place of the injured Todd Bouman. Wynn, who played in most of last week's loss to Jacksonville, is far too inexperienced to start this deep into the Fantasy season.   Drew Bledsoe , QB NE - The Executioners Updated 12/29/01 According to published reports, the Chicago Bears are interested in acquiring Bledsoe. With Tom Brady seemingly entrenched as New England's quarterback, it seems that Bledsoe has become expendable to the Patriots. The move would certainly improve the Bears' passing game, but no deals would likely be made until sometime in the spring.   Martin Gramatica , K TB - One Man Show Updated 12/28/01 Gramatica has still not been ruled out for Saturday's game, although the Buccaneers have signed veteran kicker Doug Brien as insurance. Even if Gramatica can play, he will be a very risky Fantasy starter.   Warrick Dunn , RB TB - One Man Show Updated 12/28/01 Dunn's status is day to day with a toe injury. He is expected to play this week, but Mile Alstott has been the most productive back on the team in recent weeks.   Michael Westbrook , WR WAS - The Snake Pit Updated 12/28/01 Westbrook's status is day to day with a knee injury. He is expected to play this week.   MarTay Jenkins , WR ARI - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01 Jenkins may miss his second consecutive game with an ankle injury this week. Arnold Jackson would replace him as Arizona's third receiver.  Brian Finneran , WR ATL - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01 Finneran is listed as probable with a knee injury. He is expected to play this week.   Tyrone Davis , TE GB - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01 Davis has been elevated to the No. 2 tight end slot over rookie David Martin. He will see a considerable amount of playing time now that he is healthy, because Green Bay employs many double tight end sets in the red zone.   Oronde Gadsden , WR MIA - Thrill Kill Cult Updated 12/28/01 Gadsden has been practicing this week and may be able to play. But his hamstring injury may limit his productivity.   Steve McNair , QB TEN - North Blvd Nutwhackers Updated 12/28/01 McNair was limited in practice on Thursday. He is still expected to play this week, but he is a risky Fantasy starter because he will be less than 100 percent healthy.   Jimmy Smith , WR JAC - North Blvd Nutwhackers Updated 12/28/01 Smith (flu) has missed practice time this week. He is still expected to play.   Joe Horn , WR NO - The Lie Downs Updated 12/28/01 Horn suffered a minor shoulder injury in practice on Thursday. He is expected to start this week.   Aaron Shea , TE CLE - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01 Shea (shoulder) has been placed on injured reserve. O.J. Santiago will continue to be Cleveland's No. 1 tight end while he is out.   Jason Brookins , RB BAL - Not So Nice Machine Updated 12/28/01 Brookins has returned to practice and is listed as probable. But he still may not see any game action until Week 17.  Emmitt Smith , RB DAL - The Snake Pit Updated 12/28/01 Micahel Wiley may miss this week's game with a hip injury. Smith is expected to appear on third downs this week as well as assuming his normal workload.   James Thrash , WR PHI - The Fat Bastards Updated 12/28/01 Thrash (ankle) returned to practice on Thursday. he is expected to play this week.   Wesley Walls , TE CAR - The Snake Pit Updated 12/28/01 Walls missed practice on Thursday with a knee injury. He may be a gametime decision this week.   Maurice Smith , RB ATL - Who's Yo Daddy Updated 12/28/01 A banged-up Smith Toe/knee)  will continue to start for the Falcons. But Dan Reeves has indicated Rodney Thomas will continue to get some work at halfback.   Bob Christian , RB ATL - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01 Christian is day to day with a calf injury. He is expected to play this week.   Stephen Davis , RB WAS - The Executioners Updated 12/28/01 Davis (knee) has returned to practice. He is expected to start this week.   Todd Bouman , QB MIN - Meximullets Updated 12/28/01 Bouman took a few snaps Thursday but didn't appear to meet coach Dennis Green's "full strength" criteria for starting against Green Bay.   Spergon Wynn is likely to start Sunday, though coaches didn't discuss the issue after Thursday's practice. Bouman didn't participate in the team's morning walk-through, when players work on plays without fully suiting up. And during the portion of the regular practice that reporters were allowed to watch, Wynn took more snaps than Bouman. A trainer said Wynn continued to take more snaps later in the closed portion of practice.    Jerome Bettis , RB PIT - Who's Yo Daddy Updated 12/28/01 Bettis, sidelined by a groin injury, returned to the practice field Thursday for the first time in a month. "Still questionable," coach Bill Cowher said. "He did more today. We'll see how he feels (Friday) and go from there. We'll take it day to day."   Doug Brien , K TB - Free Agent Updated 12/28/01 Brien signed a one-year contract Thursday night with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, who will use him against Baltimore if Martin Gramatica can't kick this week. Gramatica strained his right hamstring during a 48-21 victory over the Saints last week. Coach Tony Dungy hasn't ruled him out for Saturday night's game against Baltimore, however the club wanted to have a backup plan in case the Pro Bowl kicker isn't ready.   More Updates  Schedule, Breakdown  [IMAGE] Meximullets Player Pos Points Bouman, Todd  QB 0.0 Davis, Terrell  RB 0.0 Hearst, Garrison  RB 0.0 Dyson, Kevin  WR 0.0 Moss, Randy  WR 0.0 Owens, Terrell  WR 0.0 Sharpe, Shannon  TE 6.0 Wilkins, Jeff  K 0.0 Rams  DT 0.0   [IMAGE] TOTAL   6.0   [IMAGE] Chandler, Chris  QB 0.0 Brown, Troy  WR 0.0 Fiedler, Jay  QB 0.0 Green, Trent  QB 0.0 Johnson, Eric  TE 0.0 Pittman, Michael  RB 0.0 Wayne, Reggie  WR 0.0   [IMAGE] at The Executioners Player Pos Points Gannon, Rich  QB 0.0 Davis, Stephen  RB 0.0 Tomlinson, LaDainian  RB 0.0 Booker, Marty  WR 0.0 Carter, Cris  WR 0.0 Warrick, Peter  WR 0.0 Gonzalez, Tony  TE 0.0 Vinatieri, Adam  K 0.0 Jets  DT 0.0   [IMAGE] TOTAL   0.0   [IMAGE] Jefferson, Shawn  WR 0.0 Williams, Roland  TE 0.0 Barber, Tiki  RB 0.0 Bledsoe, Drew  QB 0.0 Brady, Tom  QB 0.0 Canidate, Trung  RB 0.0 Connell, Albert  WR 0.0   [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB10SP


Nothing much over here. Just trying to make a living

Danielle Samson <DanielleS@JonesGranger.com> on 02/24/2000 05:11:56 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hey guy, what's going on?


Start Date: 4/6/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040617.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:  13.00 / Final:  12.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred: 871.00 / Final: 850.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: APX1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:   6.61 / Final:   5.37)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042816.txt


Please click on the following doclink to be added to your Notes workspace:


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

June 8, 2001 5:00pm through June 11, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001         POSTPONED
This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network.  While this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services, this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities.  No network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown.  The actual physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th floor Data Center.

Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th 2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT). Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network testing has completed.

If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at 713-410-0642 for more information.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 6/8/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at  11:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/8/2001 at    8:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at    9:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/9/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at  5:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Upgrade code on Ardmore routers
Environments Impacted:  Ardmore
Purpose: There is a bug with the version of code that we are using that causes the switches to crash.
Backout:
Contact(s): 	Scott Shishido    713-853-9780

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 6/8/2001 at  5:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at  8:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/8/2001 at  3:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at  6:30:00 PM PT
	Fri 6/8/2001 at  11:30:00 PM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at  2:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Split VLAN 468 into a /27 network
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: Separate the load and traffic between AEXT, AEIN, & AX environments
Backout:
Contact(s): 	Morgan Gothard  713-345-7387

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 6/8/2001 at  5:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at  6:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/8/2001 at  3:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at  4:30:00 PM PT
	Fri 6/8/2001 at  11:30:00 PM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at  12:30:00 AM London
Outage:  AEINFW swap
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: Eminent growth and related stability issues.
Backout: Reinstall original units
Contact(s): 	Morgan Gothard  713-345-7387
FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Exchange
Time:  Sat 6/9/2001 at  12:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/9/2001 at    2:00:00 PM CT
	Sat 6/9/2001 at  10:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 6/9/2001 at  12:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/9/2001 at  6:00:00 PM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at  8:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Apply latest hotfixes to Nahou-msmbx03v & Nahou-msmbx05v
Environments Impacted:  Exchange Users on Nahou-msmbx03v & 05v
Purpose: Ensure backups and data integrity
Backout: Uninstall Hotfixes
Contact(s): 	Scott Albright  713-345-9381
		Tim Hudson  713-853-9289

MARKET DATA:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 6/8/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/8/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT  thru Fri 6/8/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT
	Fri 6/8/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Market Data TV systems upgrades
Environments Impacted:  Trading Floors
Purpose: Increase system reliability and systems management, also allow presentation of new infrastructure content to the trading floor plasma screens
Backout: re-install original systems
Contact(s): 	John Sieckman    713-345-7862

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:    ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 6/8/2001 at  7:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at  9:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/8/2001 at  5:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at  7:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/9/2001 at  1:30:00 AM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at  3:30:00 AM London
Outage:  NAMEX-LN1 and NAMTY-LN1- Needs Rebooting
Environments Impacted:  Local Office
Purpose: Need to reload NETIQ Agents for NAMTY-LN1 and NAMEX-LN1
Backout:
Contact(s): 	Wilma Bleshman    713-853-1562

Impact:
Time:  Sat 6/9/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 6/10/2001 at  1:30:00 AM CT
	Sat 6/9/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 6/9/2001 at  11:30:00 PM PT
	Sun 6/10/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 6/10/2001 at 7:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Upgrade for E10K SSP tremor requires downtime on server moe.
Environments Impacted:  Global
Purpose: An SSP is the controlling server for an E10K platform.  Moe is a domain on the E10K platform named aftershock.  In order to complete the upgrade of moe, we must first upgrade the SSP.  The first phase will entail upgrading the SSP to Solaris 8 and the SSP software.
Backout: The SSP is really a new server that needs to be configured.  The old SSP will be there if we need to back out.
Contact(s): 	Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:       SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Can we talk about what we want to pay for this capacity?  PSEG has released
at $0.16 and $0.15.  Con Ed has released at $0.14.  Do we want to pay those
prices?  Con Ed will do prearranged non-biddable with us at $0.15 (maybe
$0.14).

Thanks,
Maureen
---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2000 09:58
AM ---------------------------

"ANNE FILAS" <afilas@keyspanenergy.com> on 03/15/2000 08:30:13 AM
To: Jackie Crowley <jcrowley@sempratrading.com>, Terry Kain
<tkain@worldnet.att.net>, Cary Bender <cbender22@aol.com>, Susan Filgaras
<ceine@aol.com>, clombardi <clombardi@advanix.net>, cruikshankk
<cruikshankk@conedsolutions.com>, energon <energon@aol.com>, intenergy
<intenergy@aol.com>, "james.breslin" <james.breslin@pseg.com>, jbutkus
<jbutkus@utilicorp.com>, jgarofalow <jgarofalow@castlepower.com>, jupdale
<jlupdale@metromediaenergy.com>, jneubauer <jneubauer@naenergy.com>, kmgorden
<kmgorden@duke-energy.com>, Columbia Energy <KNovsek@columbiaenergy.com>,
lsmorris <lsmorris@metromediaenergy.com>, "marci.mansfield"
<marci.mansfield@pgees.com>, mcasas <mcasas@statoilenergy.com>, metroenergy
<metroenergy@worldnet.att.net>, mnaeser <mnaeser@naenergy.com>, pbaratz
<pbaratz@totalnrg.com>, quartiersm <quartiersm@nmenergy.com>, rdauria
<rdauria@reliantenergy.com>, rperez <rperez@allenergy.com>, saulh
<saulh@econnergy.com>, sjfuel <sjfuel@mindspring.com>, supply
<supply@castlepower.com>, tcampo <tcampo@njne.com>, "tracy.wood"
<tracy.wood@pgees.com>, Dave Mueller <dmueller@sempratrading.com>, Maureen
Smith <maureen.smith@enron.com>, Paul Garner <pegarner@duke-energy.com>, Mark
Otterstedt <MAOtters@utilicorp.com>, Rob Gennarini
<Rob.Gennarini@Conectiv.com>, Mark Gizzilli <MarkG@Cook-Inlet.com>, Chad
Wagner <CJWA@Dynegy.com>, Kristy Litner <KMLI@Dynegy.com>, Jean Ford
<JFoard@Coral-energy.com>, Carolyn Gilbert <CKROG98@aol.com>, James Toczyl
<JTOZZ@aol.com>, Tony Muscarello <Tony.Muscarello@CESOURCE.com>, Sandy Rangel
<SandyRengel@engageenergy.com>, David Silbert <SILBER2D@KochiND.com>, Gerry
Barth <GBBarth@NJNG.com>, James Burgess <JBurgess@Noblegas.com>, Eileen
Sweeney <NAU87@aol.com>, Christine Frezza <CFrezza@NUI.com>, Karen Holub
<Kholub@PCEnergy.com>, Tracey Barnett <Tracey-Barnett@PerryGas.com>, Chris
Bosco <CSB@ptrcom.com>, Bryan Frey <Bryan.Frey@gen.pge.com>, Terry Crupi
<Tjcrupi@papl.com>, Vincent Tennariello <Vincent.tennariello@pseg.com>, Carl
Nunziato <Carlnunziato@southernenergy.com>, Criss Johnson
<Johns00@texaco.com>, Bill McCartney <Mccarwh@texaco.com>, Darren Angerman
<Darren_Angerman@transcanada.com>, Duane Blackowell
<Duane_Blackowell@vapower.com>, Mike Jessup <Michael_Jessup@vapower.com>,
Sharon Baker <Sharonbaker@williams.com>, Julia Schiavi <jschiavi@hess.com>,
Linda Verona <lverona@hess.com>
cc:
Subject: Capacity Offer

Attached is a capacity offer being made by Brooklyn Union of New York
(formerly Brooklyn Union).

If you experience any difficulty opening the attached file, or have any
questions pertaining to the offer, please call me at (718) 403-2981.

All bids must be faxed to  (718) 643-6306 no later than the specified
date on the attachment.

 - Offer


Jeff:

At your request I am offering this memo to explain the status of the agenda
items before the CPUC on the issue of suspension of the direct access
program.  There are two pending draft decisions at this time, the first is
the proposed decision of ALJ Barnett (Item H-7 on the last agenda) which was
modified by a changed version submitted by Pres. Lynch at 2:45 pm on 9-5-01,
the day before the last meeting.  This version indicated that direct access
was suspended as of the date of the order (which would have been Sept. 6)
and states in another ordering paragraph that the utilities are to advise
their customers that the suspension is effective Sept. 6, 2001, specifically
naming that date.  This order would have been interpreted to suspend direct
access as of Sept. 6 if it had been voted out that day.  The other item,
Agenda Item H-7A on the last agenda, is the Bilas alternate decision which
calls for hearings to determine the impact of direct access on the issuance
of bonds, and does not suspend direct access at this time.

Please be advised that the suspension date contained in H-7 can and probably
will be changed before the orders are considered at the CPUC meeting on
Sept. 20.  Either the Sept 6 date will be changed to the 20th of Sept., or
some other specific date could be inserted at all the locations in the order
dealing with the suspension date.  All that is required to make this change
is the distribution of a changed page on the Escutia table before the
Commission meeting.  Thus, it is important for all direct access supporters
to continue to urge the Commission, especially Commissioner Brown, to
support a suspension date later than Sept. 6, because it is so easy for the
date to be altered under Commission procedures.

Please let me know if you require any additional information on this
subject.

Mike Day
Goodin, MacBride, Squeri, Ritchie & Day


UT Spring Interviews Went Great!

Enron has extended 5 offers for the Summer Associate Program to the following
candidates:

Candidate Name  Contact #  Enron Buddy - Please call your assigned candidate
at least once!

1.  Randy Katz   512-323-5083  Shawn Cumberland & Bryan Williams & Craig
Childers

2.  Eric Schnelder  512-494-8729  Pete Hayes & Charlie Weldon & Kevin
Kuykendall

3.  Ken Brock   512-457-9717  Gwynn Gorsuch & Jeff Bartlett & Paul Broderick

4.  Alan McKnight  512-707-8540  Ben Glisan & Mark Schlueter & Sean Keenan

5.  Vance Holtzman  512-358-8126  Billy Braddock & Ellen Fowler & David
Mitchell

* If I forgot someone and you would like to call a candidate please feel free
to contact any one of the 5 individuals listed above.

Since candidate cultivation is so important I have assigned members from the
team to contact each candidate directly.  Even if you leave a voice message
with a contact phone number that gives the candidate an opportunity to meet
other members of Enron's UT team.  If you do not feel comfortable answering
any of the candidates questions feel free to direct them my way.  Also if you
would like to call more candidates than just one feel free to call as many as
you would like.

Thank you for your help and support and I want to give a huge thanks to Paul
Burkhart, Mark Gandy, Webb Jennings, Drew Tingleaf, and Charlie Weldon who
helped with first round interviews.  As well as Paul Racicot and George
McCormick who helped with second round interviews.

Lets cultivated these candidates so this season we have 5 out of 5 accepts!

Regards,

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
713-345-3214


Dear Working Group Participant

We are stating up the GARP FAS 133 Working Group Meetings again. The next
meeting is on Wednesday September 20 from 6:30- 8:30 Central Time in
Houston.

Phone-In will be provided.

GREETINGS FROM GARP!   WE ARE HAVING THE NEXT MEETING SEPTEMBER 20th AT
ENRON, FROM 6:30PM UNTIL 8:30PM. Due to security we NEED EVERYONE TO RSVP,
including the names of any guest they may be bringing.  Please RSVP to
rita.hennessy@enron.com.

The meeting will cover SFAS 133 and related Risk Management Issues.
Sajjad RIzvi and Phillip Merrill (GARP Chairman relating to SFAS 133) will
be presenting.  Attendence is anticipated to include risk
control/accounting/and quantitative analyst.  Below is the following
agenda:

"FAS133 and Beyond; An update on SFAS  138 and EITF 98-10"

   Overview of ?4 major amendments to SFAS 133,  that were made in 138,
   Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain  Hedging
   Activities
        Impact of the expanded definition of Normal  Purchase Normal Sales
        on the Commodity transactions.
        Update on all the recently finalized Implementation  issues from
        DIG since the last GARP meeting in May/June 2000.
        Discussion on ?EITF 98-10 Issues on Energy related  contracts.
             ??? EITF 00-T- Capacity?contract subject  to?Lease Accounting
             treatment under SFAS 13.
             ??? EITF 96-17- Power Contracts-Long  term
             ??? EITF 91-6-? Power Contracts-Long  term

   Outline GARP's role and Methodology in dealing with the FASB regarding
   Energy related Issues
        Overview of FASB and DIG rule making process and how GARP can make
        impact
   Discussion to find Common ground on issues relating to this new
   accounting rule
        Outstanding issues in the energy  industry, including Capacity
        Sales transactions, Book-Outs  etc.
        Prioritizing issues
             Explore various positions and how to take next steps

The issues presented by SFAS 133 are very dynamic and the presenters have
requested that if you would like a particular issue raised at this meeting,
please direct your interests and questions to Sajjad Rizvi at
lima@flash.net, or call Sajjad at  281-579-3410

Again, I would like to extend a thank you to our presenters and I look
forward to your attendence.
Regards,
Frank Hayden
Director - GARP Houston Chapter


eSource presents Investext training

Investext offers immediate online delivery of original-image and full-text research reports from more than 800 of the world's top investment banks, market research firms, and trade associations.  This product is designed to provide all the information you need to know about a particular company, industry, or market.

Training Agenda Includes:
?	General Introduction.
?	Querying by company ticker in order to retrieve analyst reports.
?	Querying via Investexts free text module to retrieve industry-specific information: including statistics, economic indicators, analysis, trends, forecasts and surveys.

Attend one of our Investext Clinics:

May. 11 - 10:30 -11:30 AM 	EB572

And

May. 16 - 10:30 -11:30 AM 	EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


Thanks for looking over my shoulder!  Sara


Hey, I'm not going to the party tonight.  My William's ticket is yours.


Shirley,

Paulo and Zimin.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
04/10/2001 04:41 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Rayfael Roman Resume

Julie Gomez asked if we could talk with Rayfael.   He is an engineer at NASA
who is interested in learning about fianancial risk management.   He will be
coming to Enron the morning of April 19th (Thursday) for some informal
discussions starting at 8:00.   Paulo and I are planning to talk with him.

Vasant:  Are you available that morning?

Vince:  Anyone else you would like to include?

Thanks,

Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001
04:36 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Julie A Gomez                           04/09/2001 10:23 AM

To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rayfael Roman Resume

Dear Stinson-

Attached is Rayfael's resume.

I appreciate you giving him a call and seeing what he has to offer your group.

Thanks,

Julie  :-)


Gary, thanks for the update.  Please let me know when you have info on the other information and the
	status of November.  I appreciate all your help. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Gary E.
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 12:21 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	RE: October (Forward) Positive Displacement Meter PPA Status

All of the MidAmerican corrections for October have been made with the exception of 0737181-01,0737021-01, & 0737021-02. The charts were never received form these locations. Dan Boswell has been out of the office due to his Father's death but should be back tomorrow. We'll get a handle on the other outstanding PPAs this week.
Thanks-
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:46 AM
To:	Anderson, Gary E.; Stern, Ellis; Barnes, Caroline
Cc:	Floyd, Jodie; Dietz, Rick; Zadow, Raetta; Corman, Shelley; Neubauer, Dave; Barker, Courtney; Semin, Frank; Blair, Lynn; January, Steve
Subject:	October (Forward) Positive Displacement Meter PPA Status

	Gary and Caroline, as of today, we have emailed a list by station (7 and/or 16 day charts) to the measurement
	group which needs to be read for PPA's to correct the daily volumes fro the following shippers:

		MidAmerican - 147 stations (It is my understanding you have already 44 of the 147)
		IES - 87 stations
		Interstate Power - 6 stations
		Wisconsin Power and Light - 11 stations

	In order for Gas Logistics to keep track of the ones that need to be corrected, we would like for Measurement to send
	us updates on the following information ASAP:

		1.  Which station numbers have or have not been corrected for October.

		2.  How many October charts have been received and how many are outstanding

		3.  Provide status of November chart information.

	Gas Logistics needs the October corrections in the system by December 19th, which is the time
	frame for the first prior period run.  This is important for us to be able to review the prior period invoices.
	As you 	find there are missing charts, if we can be of assistance in calling the field, please let us know.
	This way, the measurement group can concentrate on reading the charts.

	We appreciate your assistance and help in tracking these prior periods and helping each of us to keep focused
	to get these prior period corrections done by the next months billing.  If you have any questions, please let
	Rick or I know.  Thanks. Lynn


This will confirm our dinner meeting to be held May 23, 2000 at the River
Oaks Grill

    DATE :    MAY 23, 2000
    PLACE:    WINE ROOM
         RIVER OAKS GRILL
         2630 WESTHEIMER
         713/520-1738
    TIME:     6:30 PM
    DRESS CODE:   BUSINESS CASUAL, NO JEANS, JACKET WITH KHAKIS OK

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Kay (30643) or
Beverly (57857)

I look forward to seeing you there.


Please see attached letter.

Scott A. Turner
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Suite 2600, Three Bentall Centre
595 Burrard Street, PO Box 49314
Vancouver, BC  V7X 1L3

Tel:  604.631.3318
Fax:  604.631.3309
E-mail:  sat@blakes.com

This e-mail communication is confidential and legally privileged.  If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone number shown
above or by return e-mail and delete this communication and any copy
immediately.  Thank you.

 - LtrtoRSa.DOC


The State of New Mexico has issued the settlement penalty for the turbine
replacement issue at the P-1 C/S.  You may remember that the original amount
levied against Transwestern in 1997  was $14,700.  After the Air Quality
Bureau sat on this issue for more than 4 years, they reassessed the penalty
to be $162,770.  I would like to get together and discus what our options are
on this.


Seasonal greetings and best wishes for a happy and prosperous new year!

Les.

Dr. Les Clewlow
Visiting Research Fellow, School of Finance and Economics, University of
Technology, Sydney, Australia.
Associate Research Fellow, Financial Options Research Centre, Warwick
Business School, Coventry, UK, CV4 7AL.
Director, Lacima Group Ltd. 55 Skylines Village, Limeharbour, London, E14
9TS, UK. Phn: +44 (0)171 531 9628, Fax: +44 (0)171 538 5781
WWW:   http://www.lacimagroup.com


Over the last few months, we have been discussing our standard E-mail
platform with you, our customer.  Your feedback from the various
demonstrations, surveys and Technology Showcases validated that E-mail is a
vital part of your ability to communicate effectively.  However, your
feedback also indicated that you need your E-mail client to have additional
functionality and increased integration with other applications you use.
Therefore, to meet the demands of our fast-paced business, Enron Net Works is
standardizing our E-mail platform by deploying Microsoft Outlook 2000 to all
the Business Units we currently support for messaging.  (Project plans for
EBS, EES and Azurix are still being finalized and will be communicated
separately.)

This conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000 will improve your ability to
communicate and provide a more consistent look and feel across the standard
office applications you use on a daily basis.  We are excited about this
opportunity to provide a more robust, full function solution for your
messaging needs.   To provide you with additional details about the
conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000, we are including a list of
frequently asked questions about this project.

How does this project affect me?
Your current Lotus Notes E-mail system will be converted to Microsoft Outlook
2000.

What is Microsoft Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 is the messaging client you will use to read your E-mail, update
your calendar and personal address book, record to do lists, etc.

Why are we switching to Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 integrates more effectively with our new operating system,
Windows 2000, and the Microsoft products that Enron currently uses. With
Outlook 2000, we can provide you with a more robust mail platform including
the following new features:

Instant Messaging ) Ability to send person-to-person, immediate, pop-up
messages.
Improved Palm/CE Synchronization ) Allows for simpler and quicker updates of
your hand held device from multiple places.
Conferencing Server ) Ability to conduct video conferences from your desktop.
Web Access ) Ability to retrieve your Enron E-mail via a browser.
Fax Integration ) Ability to send/receive faxes from your E-mail Inbox.
Voice Mail Integration ) Ability to have your voice mail delivered to your
E-mail Inbox for retrieval.

When will the Outlook 2000 rollout start and when will I get it?
The pilot will begin in late October with the production rollout beginning in
late November.  We are finalizing our Business Unit rollout schedule.
Additional information will be provided to all business units as it becomes
available.  Project updates will be posted on the Project section of the IT
Central web site at http://itcentral.enron.com.  Additionally, you may send
questions to Outlook.2000@enron.com, and a member of the project team will be
happy to address these individually.


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2000
02:05 PM ---------------------------

From:  Donna Greif
 04/06/2000 11:51 AM

To: Kathryn Bussell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
McClure/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary L Payne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne
Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karie
Hastings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunaid Engineer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Gullion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to
Assignment)

Changing counterparty names on Sitara deal tickets has absolutely no impact
to any downstream processes.

I hope the following will give more clarification.

Let me know if you have any questions or need more detail!

Thanks,
dg  3-9517

Sitara / Unify - Process
* Scenario - Counterparty name changes on Sitara deal ticket after deal had
been pathed, scheduled & bridged back from Unify.
* Impact - zero impact to Logistics & Volume Management, absolutely
harmless.  Settlements has process in place to eliminate issues.
* Process -
Counterparty A in Sitara changes to Counterparty B.
Ctprty A was on original path sent to pipeline.
The new name (ctprty B) does bridge over to Unify.
Ctprty A remains at the path level in Unify (gui display does not change)
Ctprty B is now displayed at the deal level in Unify.  The field is now
highlighted to indicate a change occurred. (gui display changes only at high
level, not on path)
The Scheduler has choice to repath (if necessary), or not re-path
If re-pathing occurs, the new counterparty name will be displaced on new path

Unify pushes back the deal number & meter to Sitara (not ctprty info)
Balancing works on deal number & meter only (not ctprty info)
The confirmation desk utilizes the information in Sitara (where all
information is correct)
Volume Management utilizes the information in Unify for pipeline tie-out.
(all information sent to pipeline is correct at the path level and will match
up perfectly)
Settlements utilizes information in Unify.
Settlements recognizes that changed ctprty names changes contracts, which
would create two notification entries
If invoice did happen to go out to wrong ctprty, re-draft would occur.
(note:  there was an issues discovered on reports which IT is correcting now)

Autonoms "Tom's words of warning" -
Previously there was an issue when counterparty name changes took place after
deals were pathed and nominated.  Basically it would change a key on an EDI
path (duns number) not affecting any other of the information already
nominated to the pipeline.  If the scheduler re-nominated, data at the
pipeline would get doubled up and the scheduler would have NO way to correct
the problem.  In most cases, the schedulers would have to get the pipeline to
manually cut the original nominated volume.  This is not an issue with Unify
(as explained above).

(Dave - feel free to chime in if I left anything out.)

From:  Donna Greif
 04/05/2000 01:18 PM

To: Kathryn Bussell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
McClure/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary L Payne/HOU/ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne
Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karie
Hastings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William E Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunaid Engineer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Gullion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to
Assignment)

FYI....

This change went in for the Deal Validation group.   It gives them the
ability to change counterparties names after bridge back.

Impact to Logistics - Unify
If a counterparty name change takes place to deals that have been bridge
backed, it could cause problems on EDI pipes as that new counterparty name
will flow over to Unify and repathing should eventually take place.
One problem may be with the Imbalance data sets, which are not in production
yet......(EDI Imbalance Qtys would not match up to paths)
This may also cause an issue with the scheduled quantities (especially where
nominations were sent for entire month)
can't remember the rules on this one, but I think Unify does have some safe
guards (idiot proofs) to force re-pathing.
Unify does have the ability to over-ride duns numbers, yet would still cause
an additional step for EDI the scheduler would need to think through in order
to get a clean quick response.
What are (if any) impacts to Vol Mgt if counterparty name changes take
place?  (prior periods?  re-pathing?)

I have a call into Diane and Dave both.  After speaking w/ them, hopefully I
can get a clear understanding of the true impact.  I am sure we'll need to
put some processes and procedures together for Deal Validation to follow when
these type of changes are needed.

Will keep you posted.

Thanks,

dg

	From:  Thomas Engel                           04/05/2000 09:44 AM

To: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ
Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karie Hastings/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT, William E
Kasemervisz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunaid Engineer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Gullion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to Assignment)

Regarding the ability to change counterparties on deals in SITARA with
confirmed volumes - Tom's words of caution:

If someone calls you and wants to change a counterparty - we created the
ability for you to invalidate the deal - and
then change the counterparty - however - I did add a warning message:

"Warning - changing counterparty on deal with confirmed volumes - make sure
pipeline allows this change."

Some pipelines do not allow us to change counterparties after there is
feedback - I assume for the same reasons
we had this rule - it used to blow up our old scheduling systems
(pre-UNIFY).  Some pipelines will require a new
deal and we will have to zero out the old deal.

Before you make the change - make sure the logistics person is aware - just
in case it causes problems with their
pipeline.   Sorry - I don't know which pipes these are - you will have to ask
the UNIFY team.

There is one rule still in place - you can change from ENA-IM East to ENA-IM
Market East - but not from
ENA-IM Texas to HPLC-IM HPLC - when changing business units - they must be
the same legal entity.
"Warning - not the same legal entity"

Also - beware of making contract and counterparty changes to Service deals
(Transport Capacity, Storage, Cash Out).
Once the deal is invalidated - there are no rules.  Don't forget - the items
were locked down for a reason.
 If you invalidate a service deal - and change the previously locked down
data that was validated - and someone used these
deals in UNIFY - it is highly likely that the UNIFY deals and paths created
using these deals will get corrupted.  Always check
with someone from UNIFY to make sure no one used these deals for anything in
UNIFY.

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2000 09:47
AM ---------------------------
From: Scott Mills on 04/04/2000 07:38 PM
To: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to Assignment)

With the release that was put out Tuesday evening, Deal Validation should be
able to change the counterparty on deals where the volume is something other
than expected (e.g. confirmed, nominated, scheduled, etc.).

In addition, this release will also capture "near-time" the contract changes
that are made in global.  This means that need for server bounces will not be
necessary.

 New/Changes to contracts will show up without having to get out of deal
manager.
 New Counterparties, and new/changes to facilities will require getting out
of all active Sitara apps (except for launch pad).
  Once out of all apps, start a new app - the respective information that you
are looking for will appear.

I mention "near-time" because we are constrained by the amount of time it
takes for the change in Global data to trigger an alert for Sitara who then
updates its information

SRM (x33548)

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
04/04/2000 03:41 PM
To: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana
Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle
Horn/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changes in Global due to Consent to Assignment

The following changes will be made in the Global Contracts database due to
receipt of executed Consent to Assignment for the following contracts:

Current Counterparty Name   Contract Type  Contract #   'New' Counterparty
Name
CES - Commonwealth Energy Services  GISB   96029892  Commonwealth Energy
Services

CES - Samuel Gary Jr. & Associates, Inc  GISB   96029302  Samuel Gary Jr. &
Associates

CES - South Jersey Gas Company  GISB   96029143  South Jersey Gas Company

CP name change and Contract Type correction (Contract Type different than
that provided by CES)
Per CES
CES - Southwest Gas Corporation  1/1/98 GISB  96029146

Per Contract File
CES - Southwest Gas Corporation  04/14/93 Master Purchase/Sale Interruptible
(will edit Global #96029146)
&
CES - Southwest Gas Corporation  12/01/94 Master Sale Firm   (created new
Global record to accommodate this K, #96037402)

Please note that Southwest Gas Corporation has consented to the assignment of
both of these contracts.


Please reply by return email if you want to play doubles on Thursday, August 23rd at 6:00 a.m. at the Met.  Let me know if you prefer to play with Group A, Group B or have no preference.

Timothy J. Detmering
713/853-6973 Phone
713/853-9917 Fax
timothy.j.detmering@enron.com

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Per my voice mail, you can see the floating price index language (power and
gas) that I need.  Please email or fax so that I can insert it into my draft
confirm.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/14/99 12:11
PM ---------------------------

Stuart Zisman
12/13/99 03:12 PM
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Updated Term Sheets

---------------------- Forwarded by Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT on 12/13/99 03:11
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rodney Malcolm                           12/13/99 11:00 AM

To: Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C
Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Simpson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Updated Term Sheets

Guys,

Attached are the term sheets with the changes we discussed this morning.  I
will be sending them out early this afternoon so if you get a chance to go
over them one last time and let me know if there are any busts I'd
apprieciate it.

Thanks for all the help,
Rodney


Please contact Gia Maisashvili (713-853-4346) or John Neslage (713-853-6827)
and let them know which working group you would like to participate in.

Thanks,
Marcia


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                  JUNE 07, 2001

Notice ID: 2786
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT:  CAPACITY ALLOCATION-EVENING NOMINATION CYCLE FOR JUNE 8, 2001

          PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE

          BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY
          NOMINATIONS.

RECEIPT:

LEBANON AGGREGATE: There is no capacity for new IPP customers.  Flowing IPP
customers received 77.419% of their previously confirmed June 8, 2001 volumes.

Excess MDWQ            Available +
ISS Withdrawals        Available
SIT Withdrawals        Available
Imbalance Drawdowns    Available
Pal Lends              Available

Excess MDIQ            Available +
ISS Injections         Available
SIT Injections         Available
Imbalance Paybacks     Available
PAL Parks              Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at(304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and
delivery points for the gas day of June 8, 2001.  You may now view the
quantities you are authorized to flow on June 8, 2001. On the Internet
NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service
Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations.
The quantities confirmed to flow for your account will be available on the
Internet NAVIGATOR after 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 7, 2001.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


Amy,
Hope everything is going well with you.   I dont know if Tim has talked with you, but I am considering returning to Portland.
I am talking with Wolfe and Tim,  but I would like to keep things low key.    I know this all seems pretty weird,   but my situation has changed so drastically that I have some major,  immediate decisions to make.    Basically,   the East Desk wants me to build a team in Real Time,  similar to how we did it in Portland.
Unfortunately,  that was not the job I agreed to take (always get it in writing - I never could).     Had I known that it was a similar position to what I had,  I never would have left.

Anyway,  Kim Melodick wants me to consider opportunities within Enron Houston and I have agreed to give her a week to see if a fit exists.   She is easy to work with and is being very helpful.    However,  I have expressed  to Kevin and Kim that my first preference would be to return to Portland.

I have given this some thought and believe that taking the Real Time position would not be a good move for me, given the atmosphere here.
 I would like to have a new perspective on this if you have time to converse.     I would appreciate any feedback that you can give me.

Thanks,
JMF

I


Yes please explain that 8 need Dr signature so she can start preschool Tues.  Besides Fri and Mon afternoons I don't have any other planned time off
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


-----Original Message-----
From: Bolks, Sean
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Watson, Kimberly; McConnell, Mark
Subject: FW: The new phone numbers are in!!!

Kim and Mark,
Here are the numbers
 -----Original Message-----
From: McFarland, Jean
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Bolks, Sean; Burleson, Bob; Cabrera, Reyna; Gilbert, Maurice; Gottsponer, Morgan; Herber, Stephen; McCarran, Penny; Mercaldo, Vernon; Neville, Sue; Powell, Don; Pryor, Tony; Ramirez, Pilar; Riehm, Richard; Roobaert, Preston; Stage, Michael G.; Threet, Kay; Torres, India; Wehring, Linda; Weller, Steve
Cc: Cappiello, Deborah; Gracey, Rosemary; Hook, Connie; Janousek, Martha
Subject: The new phone numbers are in!!!

Below are the new Dynegy phone numbers!  On Thursday night, around 5:00 pm the Enron number will be setup to forward to the new Dynegy numbers.  Callers will hear the new number and will be asked to press 1 to transfer.  There will be no voicemail option on the Enron side.  If you have any questions, please reply via this email.   Thanks.  Jean

Name                               Loc             Co           Phone #
Pryor	 Tony	 2610	 Enron	 287-1031
Powell	 Don	 2612	 Enron	 287-1032
Gilbert	 Maurice	 2614	 Enron	 287-1033
Visitor	 	2616	 Enron	 287-1034
Storage & Pricing	 	2618	 Enron	 287-1035
Jones	 Dana	 2620	 Enron	 287-1036
Neubauer	 Dave	 2622	 Enron	 287-1037
Landreneau	 Jada	 2624	 Dynegy 	287-1038
Kitchen	 	2625	 General	 287-1024
Conf. Rm.	 	2628	 General	 287-1045
Meridia	 Amin	 2630	 Dynegy 	287-1042
Tran	 Janet	 2630	 Dynegy 	287-1041
Weller	 Steve	 2632	 Enron	 287-1043
Herbert	 Steve	 2634	 Enron	 287-1044
Stage	 Michael	 2636	 Enron	 287-1045
Wehring	 Linda	 2637	 Enron	 287-1046
McCarran	 Penny	 2638	 Enron	 287-1047
Conf. Rm.	 	2639	 General	 287-1048
Burleson	 Bob	 2640	 Enron	 287-1049
Torres	 India	 2642	 Enron	 287-1051
Visitor	 	2615-A	 Enron	 287-1011
Mercaldo	 Vernon	 2615-B	 Enron	 287-1012
Krishnarao	 Krishna	 2615-C	 Enron	 287-1013
Bolks	 Sean	 2615-D	 Enron	 287-1014
Riehm	 Richard	 2615-E	 Enron	 287-1015
Ramirez	 M Pilar	 2615-F	 Enron	 287-1016
Dyn TBD	 	2617A	 Dynegy 	287-1017
Neville	 Sue	 2617-B	 Enron	 287-1018
Threet	 Kay	 2617-C	 Enron	 287-1019
Cabrera	 Reyna	 2617-D	 Enron	 287-1021
Gottsponer	 Morgan	 2617-E	 Enron	 287-1022
Roobaert	 Preston	 2617-F	 Enron	 287-1023
Fax	 	2617-G	 Enron	 287-1020
V-Tel Video	 	2611
PolyCom	 	2611	 	287-1025


The meeting is in room 3259 from 3:00 - 4:00.  Experience has taught me that
someone much more important may bump us.

This meeting will focus on the CGAS storage contract.  What we bill CES for
storage injections will be different than what we actually inject.  April is
a little more difficult because we will be injecting and withdrawing at the
same time.  CGAS only bills on the net injections or withdrawal amounts.  The
deals in Sitara are set up as CPR Storage for the injections and the
withdrawals.

Which brings up the following issues;
 *   How do we bill CES for injections if we don't enter buy/sales with CES
at the storage facility.
  Kate Fraser said there were never any BUG buy/sale tickets in Sitara for
storage.  How did that work?  Mark, I'm counting on you for this one.

 * How do we track the storage balance in Unify?

 * How are the injection/withdrawal cost capture, especially since CGAS will
bill on the net injections/withdrawals

I'm sure there are more issues that will come up during the meeting.

Thanks

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           04/11/2000 02:21 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meeting

You have Greg Whalley's  old office  EB 3259 from 3:00- 4:00.  That is all I
could get.

Chris Germany
04/11/2000 01:58 PM
To: Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting

Please reserve a conference room for up to 7 people for 1 hour on Wednesday,
April 12th around 2:30pm.

thanks


This was the emergency.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/09/2001 02:49
PM ---------------------------
From: Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/09/2001 02:41 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Morell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: ABB Purchase Agreement

Kay:  Brice Golden insists that he has learned about the existance of a
Purchase Agreement in place under which projects such as his for Ft Pierce
can add their order for Transformers, without having to negotiate a stand
alone contract.  Sort of an ala carte arrangement.  I have asked Sheila Tweed
what she knew about this, and she said she had nothing, but did not know what
you might have done.  I know we have done bulk purchases and later split for
the different peaker  projects, and some others similar to that, but no
blanket agreement.  What have you got?

BB


In order to provide better oversight and control of ENA legal expenditures
on large transactions, please continue to follow the procedures set forth
below for transactions where outside legal fees and expenses are expected to
exceed $25,000.00.  The purpose of these procedures is to (i) improve
communication with counsel (inside and outside) on issues, fees and services
and (ii) send price signals on legal costs (with respect to specific
transactions) on a timely basis to the business units.  Every effort should
be made to continue to provide high quality legal work that has become
standard at ENA.

 1.  A written estimate of proposed fees and expenses and a written
description of the services shall be provided by our outside counsel.  The
responsible business unit and the General Counsel shall review and approve
such written estimate before our outside counsel is directed to provide
substantial professional services.

 2.  Our outside counsel shall be instructed to promptly submit a revised
written estimate if such outside counsel determines that legal fees and
expenses for such transaction will exceed the previous written estimate by
$25,000.00.  Such revised written estimate shall be reviewed and approved by
the responsible business unit and the General Counsel or his/her designee
before our outside counsel is directed to provide substantial additional
professional services.

 3.  In order to accurately track such expenses so that the expenses can be
properly allocated to the various business units, a work order number should
be obtained for each transaction.

 Thank you for your cooperation.  If you have any questions or any other
suggestions for controlling expenses, please call me at extension 36544.


The location is EB 3907.

---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron on 02/22/2001 01:53 PM ---------------------------

Tracy Geaccone
02/22/2001 12:52 PM
To:	Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron, John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron, Randy Rice/OTS/Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pallavi Goradia/Corp/Enron
cc:	Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron, Cheryl Cole/OTS/Enron@Enron, Kim Ladish/OTS/Enron, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron

Subject:	Maintenance Schedule for TW

Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss TW maintenance scheduled for this year.  We would like to discuss when the maintenance will be, the duration, and what will be done.  Please be prepared to discuss any savings we will have from the plan for maintenance that will not have to be done because of our planned expansion (capital and expense.)  We will be meeting on Monday, February 26 at 3:00.  I will send out the location later today.

Thanks

Tracy Geaccone


Please see attached - you sent the flowers!

Nicki

	From:  Dorie Hitchcock @ ECT                           11/12/2000 17:03

To: Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: HOLIDAY PARTY THANKS

I wanted to thank everyone involved for the beautiful bouquet of flowers that
I received today.  It was a pleasure working with all of you on the holiday
party at Enron Field.  I appreciate the executives 'stepping up to the plate'
(so to speak) when they were asked to go out on the field.  You could tell by
the roar from the audience that they thoroughly enjoyed the banter!!  I would
also like to thank Nicki Daw, Kim Hillis, Cathy Phillips, Jennifer Burns, Sue
Ford, Marsha Schiller, Liz Taylor and Kay Chapman for all their efforts and
support during the planning of this event.

My greatest reward is knowing that everyone enjoyed the festivities.  Thanks
again and I wish all of you a very joyous holiday season!!


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
08:02 AM ---------------------------

vkamins@enron.com on 11/06/2000 01:52:36 PM
To: ddelain2@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Approval for reviewer

KAMINSKI,WINCENTY J  has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your
approval.  You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP
at http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on KAMINSKI,WINCENTY J  until you have
approved the list.


I may have to start training now for that.

Wilson Kriegel@ENRON
05/02/2000 01:11 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Red Meat

Yes coming to visit in NY will be a must and i'll take you out, with my Boyz,
and show you a little what partying, drinking and going all out is all about.


Scot Chambers at 6-8371


Here's the latest.   If you make comments, please make them on this version.

Fax comments to BOTH 530-327-9235 (yes, "530")  and 503-464-3740 or email the
comments to AComnes@enron.com with redline/strikout turned on.

Kim Curry, please take a formatting pass if you can first thing Wed and email
back to me when done.

Alan Comnes


Earnings calender site:

http://biz.yahoo.com/research/earncal/20001017.html


mom is going to pick me up.  i will bring plenty of luggage.  see you
tomorrow.


558066 - I see 367 in this deal

557412 - Mallory's deal changed to Bloomberg

Sean is entering last two deals.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/22/2001 01:59 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/22 Checkout

BLOOMBERG

Mike Swerzbin
deal 558066
Bloomberg shows price as $367.....enpower has $267.

Jeff Richter
I am missing the following deal:
Enron sells to Dynegy Power 25 mw of 3/23-3/24 off-peak SP-15 at $140.00

PREBON

Dianna/Sean

I am missing the following deals:
1) Enron buys from Duke 25 mw of 3/23-3/24 Mid-C peak hrs at $310.00
2) Enron sells to Mirant 25 mw of 3/23-3/24 Mid-C peak hrs at $310.00

AMEREX WEST
All deals checked out o.k.


Let me know if you have any questions.


I forgot to put in a signature block. Otherwise, it looks good.

	Lilia Roman
	11/16/2000 02:13 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Lay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject:

Attached is the CMS Release form we will be sending John Rickett.  Please
approve with the information we filled in.  Thank you.

Lilia Roman
Sr. Administrative Assistant
(713) 853-9154
(713) 345-7670 fax


call me


I wondered whose email address this was when I saw it on one of Uncle Joes emails.  Thanks so much for the E postcards that you sent me.  I guess you have talked to Monte?  Email me back so we can talk.  Oh, I need your physical address so I can send you something.

Love you.

Mrs. Dana


Communicating Across Differences - October 10, 2001
DoubleTree Hotel - DeZavala
8:00 am - 12:00 pm          Cost:  $350

This course focuses on using the world's most powerful personality profile, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to learn to communicate and work with people whose personalities and communication styles are different from your own.  It begins from the foundation of understanding your own personality and communication approach, then moves to applying that knowledge to improve communication with others.  One of the additional tools used in this course is the "MBTI Work Styles"-which explores in detail how personality differences affect people's approach to work and communication.

The program is highly interactive, with exercises and activities that enable participants to truly experience how human personality impacts people's communication, priorities, decision-making, and work style.  It is also highly practical, focusing on maximizing successful business outcomes through effective communication.

Achieving Results Through Coaching - October 10, 2001
DoubleTree Hotel - DeZavala
1:00 pm - 5:00 pm          Cost:  $350

This course uses a classic competency model, as well as a powerful assessment of interpersonal communication style, called the FIRO-B, as a foundation for coaching.  It teaches the coach to think himself or herself back through their own learning stages in order to coach others effectively.  It also teaches participants to recognize the different stages where the various people they coach might be and adapt their coaching style as employees move from stage to stage.  It also helps participants understand their own interpersonal communication style, through the FIRO-B, and learn to leverage it for greatest effectiveness as a coach.

Participants will create coaching action plans for use with employees.

For registration, please login to our website http://elm.enron.com "Management/Leadership"    If you have problems registering or have any questions, please call 713-853-0357.


Mark -- can you look at Section 4 of this Agreement?  It applies to
participants that want to enter into swaps -- while Mark or I could go to
school on CFTC rules, I thought it would be faster if you could take a look
at it and give us any comments -- thanks.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490
----- Forwarded by Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 12:54 PM -----

	Travis McCullough
	02/26/2001 12:13 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Access Agreement

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490
----- Forwarded by Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 12:13 PM -----

	Bob Shults
	02/22/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Travis.McCullough@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Access Agreement

Travis

I assume you have seen this.  I am meeting with Truequote next week and they
were asking questions relative to this agreement.  Are we prepared to
transact under the conditions of this agreement?  Please give me a call to
discuss. ext 30397
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001 09:54 AM
---------------------------

"Joe F. Wright" <joe.wright@truequote.com> on 02/21/2001 04:10:35 PM
To: <bob.shults@enron.com>
cc: "Chris Edmonds"@mailman.enron.com
Subject: Access Agreement

Bob,

Chris asked me to e-mail our standard Access Agreement to you.  I will also
later e-mail to you our terms and conditions which will be posted to the
website once I have had the opportunity to clean those up a bit.

Sincerely,

Joe F. Wright
General Counsel
truequote.com
9931 Corporate Campus Drive
Suite 2400
Louisville, Kentucky 40223
502-212-4909
502-212-4907 fax
502-593-3031 mobile
joe.wright@truequote.com

 - tradingagreementFINALFINALFINALenrondeleted.doc


Kyle:

Please find attached file. Transportation & Storage Revenue is right off the Earning Model Income Statement. Carlton data can be found in the Commercial Function detail within the "Database" worksheet of the Earning Model. The Cash Flow verbiage is very general related to the subject matter, but does provide a business reason on a Direct Cash Flow basis for an item buried within the Indirect Cash Flow format. Call me if you have any further questions and I will attempt to get you through them.    I can also get you set up to get even more detailed answers if you would like.

Rod Hayslett
EB4054
713-853-6178

Rod,

Thanks for the email.  Can you help me match the information in this email
to your operating plan or cash flow analysis?

Kyle

 <<AnnualStats.xls>>

(See attached file: AnnualStats.xls)


Forwarding the attached resume for consideration for the following positions:

Id # 0000106109
ENA Strategic Information
Wholesale, REtail & COMM

Id# 0000107748
Corp Analysis and Repporting
Corporate Staff Human Resources & CoMM REL

Thank you for your consideration.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Vicki --

I have heard recently that EES is signing up customers in Texas that "passes thru" congestion.  There may be some billing and settlement issues given ERCOT's systems.  Basically, we will not know based on our bill from ERCOT what each customer's congestion was.  I want to make sure that EES billing can determine how to charge this?

Who should I talk with?

Jim


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
09:26 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Elizabeth Soto                           11/02/2000 08:05 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Bagwell/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Two Flatscreens to be moved...

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
08:05 AM ---------------------------

Move-Team@ENRON
11/01/2000 08:07 PM
Sent by: John Salinardo@ENRON
To: Arnold Otten/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Two Flatscreens to be moved...

Arnold, can you please have these flat screens moved 11/02 morning.  I will
mark them as complete on the next available churn.  Thank you.

	From:  Elizabeth Soto                           11/01/2000 03:27 PM

To: Move-Team/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Bagwell/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Two Flatscreens to be moved...

Attached is the original churn that was submitted, the night that this was
supposed to happen your people
were not able to switch the monitors out due to Bid - Week which is the
busiest time of the month and my
person was still working.  The person who came to move the monitors said that
they would come back on
Monday or Tuesday and here it is Wednesday and nothing has been done.  If you
could update me with some
type of information as far as when this will be taken care of that would be
greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Elizabeth
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
03:09 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Elizabeth Soto                           10/26/2000 10:14 AM

To: Move-Team/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Two Flatscreens to be moved...


????? Technology Seminar Announcement

Technology 4 Attorneys, LLC
invites you to attend our seminars on:
?? April 3, 2001,? EUGENE,
April 4, 2001,? SALEM,
?????? April 5, 2001,? PORTLAND

"Save Time, Money, and Improve
?Your Law Practice with Technology"

Morning Session - INTERNET HELP $75
Afternnon Session - PRACTICE HELP $75
Both Sessions $145

**Application for 6.0 Oregon MCLE Credits in Process**

SOME DEMO SOFTWARE GIVEAWAYS!!!
?

Seminar Highlights

Learn How To:

*Improve and Expedite Your Internet Legal Research
*Capture More Billable Time/ Improve Case Management
*Design or Update Your Firm Web Site to Make it Work Better
*Eliminate Your Fax Machine, Postage Meter, and Copier
*Utilize Inexpensive and Indirect Tech Advertising Techniques
*Save Time and $ With Practical Technology Recommendations

TIME IS SHORT...Seating is Limited...FOR SEMINAR BROCHURE,
MORE INFO, OR TO REGISTER, go to: www.technology4attorneys.com

Thank You

*See Our Ad in the March, 2001 Bar Bulletin*


Per my conversation with Eloise Williams the proceeds of $138,475,829 were never recorded on 33R but were recorded on 33Q.  Since this is a sale of inventory I'm assuming that the gain will be ordinary and should be reduced by the tax basis in the credits of $104.8 million.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herrold, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:39 AM
To:	Fischer, Mary
Cc:	Seade, Jerry; Swafford, John; Eggebrecht, Kurt
Subject:	FW: SO2 Reclass Entry - Correction

Mary, I'm not sure what accounting is doing.  The entry below is not complete.  For third quarter close company 33R received proceeds of $138,475,829 for SO2 credits.  The credits are held in inventory on company 33Q, the mark-to-market revenue for the SO2 is reported on 33R.

The attached workbook is my best guess of the tax basis in the credits ($104.8 million); the tax gain should be about $33.7 million.

Can you check with your accounting contacts for company 33R to get a complete picture of the accounting entries?

 << File: so2 inv1.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Eloise
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:41 AM
To:	Herrold, Jeff
Cc:	Murphy, Carla
Subject:	FW: SO2 Reclass Entry - Correction

The correct entry is a debit to 19999995 (Cash) and a credit to 45000000 (Revenue)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Eloise
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:27 AM
To:	Herrold, Jeff
Cc:	Murphy, Carla
Subject:	SO2 Reclass Entry

Jeff,

The SO2 entry was booked to the following accounts:

Debit to 19999995             $138,475,829.50
Credit to 20011000            $138,475,829.50

Eloise Williams
Enron Global Markets
713-345-1667


Please include the transactions by desk sheets?


Lucy:

Tana tells me you are looking for some guidance as to which Enron entity
should be used for booking trading transactions with various counterparties.
There are a couple of general rules that apply to "normal" trading
circumstances and I'll spell them out below, but remember that these are not
hard and fast rules and may go straight out the window when circumstances
vary (even just a little bit) from "normal."  For example, abnormal
situations exist where the trading transaction is in connection with another
transaction with an Enron company (e.g. a financing or equity investment),
the counterparty has a legally justifiable desire to trade with a certain
Enron company, the product being traded is only traded by a particular Enron
company or the counterparty is in a jurisdiction outside the country where we
are trading (except as spelled out below).  Having said all that, the
following rules (generally tax driven) can be used as general guidelines:

1. If there is no master agreement in place between the counterparty and an
Enron company, the trade should be entered into on behalf of the Enron
company based in the country where the Enron trader is when the trade is
concluded and, if there is any hope of further trading with the counterparty,
Credit and Legal should be notified to negotiate a master agreement.  Of
course, if the counterparty is outside the country where we are trading,
Legal should be consulted ahead of time (there are some countries where
derivatives are actually illegal, special procedures must be followed or
can't be done by us from the U.S.).

2. If there is a master agreement between the counterparty and either ENA or
Enron Canada, and the Enron trader is in the U.S. or Canada, the trade should
be entered into by the trader on behalf of the Enron company that is party to
the master agreement.  If the trader is outside of the U.S. or Canada, other
rules may apply.

3. If there is a master agreement between the counterparty and ECT
International (usually only European counterparties), and the Enron trader is
in the U.S. or the U.K., the trade should be entered into by the trader on
behalf of ECT International.  Note that there are special considerations if
the trader is in the U.K. based on U.K. regulatory issues (the trade is
actually "arranged" by Enron Europe Finance and Trading Ltd. on behalf of ECT
International).  If such a master exists but the trader is not in the U.S. or
U.K., the trade should be handed off to a trader located in one of those two
countries for final negotiation and execution.  It would be a good idea to
consult with Legal or Tax if this comes up for more specific advice.

These general rules relate to which Enron entity should be the legal
counterparty to the transactions.  This doesn't determine where within the
Enron family the actual risk should ultimately reside.  If we want the risk
to be in an Enron company other than the Enron counterparty for contractual
purposes, an intercompany transaction should be booked (probably through RMT)
to get the risk in the right place.