---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
09:30 AM ---------------------------

"Clark Mayers" <jcmayers@earthlink.net> on 11/02/2000 01:59:46 PM
Please respond to "Clark Mayers" <jcmayers@earthlink.net>
To: "Darron Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Hello, Young People.....
?
Still planning on the KU/UT game next weekend, I  hope.? If you are flying
in, you can get?from the airport, about 30-35  miles, without hitting a
traffic light until the last mile or so.
?
FROM THE AIRPORT:
1.? Exit the airport toward Kansas City on  I-29 South.? When you get to
2.??I-635, go South; probably will be  marked to "Wichita" or maybe Kansas
City.? When you get to
3.??I-35, go South again.? You will  be somewhere around 50th street.? Street
numbers increase as you go  south.
4.? After 75th Street stay in the right lane  and take Hiway 69 South.
5.? Stay on Hiway 69; after 119th Street it  will curve left and then right.?
After the right hand curve, the road  merges with another highway.? Stay in
the extreme right lane  and
6.? Exit at 135th street.? Exit to the  right and stay in the right lane
until the first light; (Antioch).? (About  half mile).
7.? Turn right at Antioch (first light) and  get into the left lane.
8.? Short block to the first light; this is  133rd Street; turn left.
9.? Go to the second right; this is  Kessler.? Turn right on Kessler.
10.? Take the immediate left onto 132nd  Place.? Go to second house on right;
not counting the house on the  corner.? The address is 9210.
?
After you leave the airport, the exits onto I-29  and then onto I-35 come a
little quickly, so watch for the signs.?  I expect to be home all weekend.?
But, if I  am out, the garage door keypad combination is "0730".? Make
yourselves at  home and help yourselves to anything that is not tied or
nailed down or  hazardous.? My phone number is (913) 402-9210; cell phone is
(913)  269-6247.? Not necessary to dial the area code once you get into
Kansas.? From the airport (Missouri) you'll need the area  code.
?
If you're driving, exit I-35 in Olathe at Exit  215.? Turn right and go about
4.5 miles to Switzer (school on left; park on  right).? Left on Switzer to
first right (133rd Street).? Right on  133rd to second left (Kessler).? Left
on Kessler; left on 132nd Place to  house.? Let me know when you expect to
arrive and then depart and maybe we  can line something up to keep you busy
while you're here.? Sean and Tracie  will be in San Antonio that weekend, and
Mike and Christine can't make it, but  Michelle and her gang and Kim are
anxious to see you again.? See you  soon......Clark.


There is no counterparty set up in the system as Coral Canada US, Inc.   The deals that Ann sent to me were not changed because the counterparty name was not set up and address information was not sent to me with the corrected confirmations.    These were sent back to Ann.  As far as I know the Trader did not give me any information on the counterparty name and address information..  If you have received this information on your end then I would suggest that you send in a GCP request so that Global Counterparty can set the counterparty up in the database.  Once this is done then you would need to send Sean the deal numbers that need to be changed.

Vladi, should the counterparty name be Coral Canada US, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dozier, Scott
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 10:16 AM
To:	Riordan, Sean
Cc:	Hernandez, Elizabeth L.; Pimenov, Vladi
Subject:	Deal Confirm for Coral Energy Canada

Sean,

Elizabeth should be familiar with what I will be refering to in this note, so please reference her if need be...

There are several ENA sales for Sep-01 production to Coral Energy Canada, Inc. which the counterparty is claiming should be billed under Coral Canada US, Inc.  The counterparty will not pay on these items until corrected.  In fact, the counterparty faxed back our confirmation with the requested change back in September.  Ann (I don't know eher last name) with ENA physical confirmations said that she was aware of these confirmations and that they had been forwarded to Elizabeth for her attention.  It is my understanding that once noted that there was actually no counterparty in our systems under this new name, the traders for each company should have been in contact to straighten this out.  I am unaware of that occuring or even if that is the correct procedure.

I am cc'ing Vladi Pimenov because Sitara shows him as having created at least one of the deals.  Maybe he can clarify things for us.  One example of such deals is 1026087.  Bottom line is I need a way of receiving payment from Coral on these items.

All - please advise.

Scott Dozier
Client Services - Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
office: 713.345.7213
fax: 713.646.8420
email: scott.dozier@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 02:28 PM
---------------------------

"Libbi Lake" <llake@argolink.net> on 03/02/2001 02:03:53 PM
To: "Randy Crump" <prcrump@dcf.com>, "Anderson Mohle" <tandmolehill@ev1.net>,
"Brett Neal" <sneal12@mindspring.com>, "Brett Neal" <Scott.neal@enron.com>,
"Colton Robey" <probey@energyUSA.com>, "Colton Robey" <probey1@aol.com>,
"Connor Dougherty" <dbd@whplaw.com>, "Connor Dougherty"
<doughertymd@aol.com>, "Eric Hurst" <beth.hurst@abnamro.com>, "Jane Evans"
<JBEVANS123@aol.com>, "Jim West" <jwest@houston.rr.com>, "Michael Swearingin"
<Elizabeth.O.Swearingin@WellsFargo.com>, "Steve Evans" <evanssk@aol.com>,
"Will McCallum" <km@kjmccallum.com>, "William Crump" <prcrump@msn.com>
cc:
Subject: RAINOUT!

Rockhounds & Parents,
?
Looks like we'll be rained out this afternoon for batting cage  practice.?
For tomorrow's practice we'll probably be unable to play on the  field due to
standing water, or possibly continued rain, but, we will go ahead  and have a
"skull" session at my house at 9:00am.? My address is 13611  Pinerock, just
off of Yorkchester (between Wilchester and Kirkwood), 4 blocks  north of
Memorial.
?
The practice tomorrow will be 1 hour, from 9 till 10:00.?  See everyone then.
?
Jeff


I'm sure that many of you are aware that there has been a great deal of
activity lately related to Enron's evaluation of possible acquisitions.  John
Goodpasture's group has kept a large number of ET&S people engaged in looking
at a number of potential deals.  While these deal evaluation projects have
become routine around here, we all must remember that these projects are
extremely confidential.  Even after a potential seller has announced that it
is up for sale, the fact that Enron is looking at a potential deal, as well
as any of our internal analysis of the deal, remains strictly confidential.

I realize that many of you have ongoing business relationships with employees
of some of the companies that we have evaluated or may evaluate in the
future.  If you find yourself in such a situation, and a business contact at
the target company asks whether Enron is evaluating the contact's company or
assets, the only appropriate response is that Enron personnel are not
permitted to discuss potential acquisitions.  Please be aware that the
confidentiality agreements that we typically sign as part of the acquisition
evaluation process preclude any communication by Enron people with employees
of the target company.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this requirement, please do
not hesitate to give me a call.  Thank you for your assistance.  DF


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lew, Jaesoo" <JLew@reliant.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 10:29 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:

Hi Vince,

How are you?

I'm doing well at the new job.

I heard the news from Shirley. It's something we expected but
confirmation of the expectation seemed like ultimatum, which is sad.
As I mentioned before, I would like to have a lunch with you and listen
some career advice from you sometime this week or any time at your
convenience.  Is it O.K. with you?

Sincerely,

Jaesoo


Shirley,

I hope it's OK with the apartment company.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
01:38 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Sharad Agnihotri                           10/30/2000 11:40 AM

To: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Houston trip

Hi All,

I am hoping to come to Houston from the 5th to the 17th of November.
Sorry about the short notice.

Looking forward to seeing you.

Sharad Agnihotri


Please see attached draft and let me know if you have any comments or suggested changes.


Mike:  What are your thoughts on this?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 09/27/2000 11:37 AM -----

	Marianne Castano@EES
	09/27/2000 09:01 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: SDG&E Credits

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 09/27/2000
09:02 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Marianne Castano                           09/27/2000 09:00 AM

To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: SDG&E Credits

Jeff & Mona:  We have confirmed that our contracts are silent on the issue.
Question remains as to what the language of the original decision was...Can
you suggest someone who can dig into this for us?  Should I just phone Mike
Day?  Let me know...MLC

From: Jeff Dasovich on 09/22/2000 10:22 AM
To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SDG&E Credits

Likely needs to be a legal analysis based on the language of the original
decision etablishing the credits.  But seems to me that we have a deal with
our customers to receive service according to price, terms and conditions
stated in our contracts with those customers, and that the contract language
would govern how the credit is treated.  If  the contracts don't speak to the
issue of credits, seems that our contract agrees to provide rez customers
with service for a a certain price, and as such, it would be up to us whether
we flow it through.  But a lawyer, I am not.  Are our contracts silent on the
issue?

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/22/2000 10:16 AM -----

	Marianne Castano
	09/22/2000 08:41 AM

		 To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: SDG&E Credits

Can either of you help me out with this question?   MLC

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 09/22/2000
08:41 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Karen A Cordova                           09/21/2000 05:00 PM
	Phone No: 713.853.3150
  713.646.8860 - FAX No.

To: Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: SDG&E Credits

Diane Huddelston called Lori Pinder about an issue;  Here it is:

Due to the merger btw SDG&G & Sempra Energy (about a year or less ago), a
savings was realized.  The CPUC said these savings must be passed on to
customers 1 time per year, in September.  They are called Annual Merger
Credits.

Pursuant to all commercial contracts, Enron is entitled to keep the savings
(per Diane).  What about the residential customer accounts?

Enron keeps the savings or should the residential customer receive?

Who could handle this issue for Diane?

Thanks, KC


Dear class:

Sorry.  I forgot to change the subject label on the last e-mail. It should
have read "session 6 overheads."

Barry Staw

 - Session 6 overheads97.doc


Kevin, Steve, and Shashi--Per your request,  attached is a memo that
addresses regulatory issues with Enron's potential minority investment in a
software company providing tagging or scheduling software to the electric
transmission industry.  Aside from possible routine reporting requirements
and possible additional standards of conduct precluding the sharing of
information with the traders, there are no issues pertaining to PUHCA  and
the Fed. Power Act.  Christi 37007
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 10/11/99
01:35 PM ---------------------------

"Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com> on 10/11/99 01:02:58 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: REVISED - Memo On Software Company

Please disregard the fax sent earlier today and use this updated memo
pursuant to Christi's request.  We added two sentences - one at the end of
the first paragraph and one at the end of the second paragraph (under
Executive Summary).  I have attached it in wordperfect and word.

Andrea

 - 0114436.03
 - software.doc


====================================================================
THE SOVEREIGN SOCIETY OFFSHORE A-LETTER
Your Link to Freedom, Privacy & Prosperity in the Offshore World
Tuesday, December 12, 2000 - Vol. 2  No. 58
====================================================================
In This Issue:
* COMMENT: The Money Laundering Farce Must End -
Insatiable FATF. Nauru's Billions. Swiss Reputation. ML Links.

* OFFSHORE: Bahamas Bank Quits. Anti-OECD Group. BVI & Man Folding?
Bermuda Independence Back Again.
$$ The Offshore Money Manual - Don't Go Offshore Without It $$

* WEALTH: Tax News from US, Ireland, Russia, Gibraltar. Diamond Boom.
$$ The World's Six Best Retirement Havens $$

* PRIVACY: U.K. Snoop Law Countered. Wired Privacy Link. Web Phones.
====================================================================
COMMENT: The Money Laundering Farce Must End
by Bob Bauman, Editor.

One of the major arguments of the world money police is the imagined
need to stop "money laundering." They claim widespread abuse of banking
and other financial systems by sinister criminal forces. Offering little
proof, artful officials use their questionable premise to justify a
supposed right to monitor and record all financial transactions. By
design, banks and their employees have been forced into the unwanted
role of spies and police deputies.

In the only popular uprising against this arrogant attack on financial
privacy, in 1999 protests from hundreds of thousands of irate Americans
forced the US government to back down on so-called "Know Your Customer"
rules. The KYC proposals would have made every American banker a
government vetting agent, with a duty to investigate, watch for and
report supposed "suspicious activity" of all account holders. (Since
then the Clinton administration has pressed banks to adopt "voluntary"
KYC rules in spite of these protests).

From earliest history, unless restrained, governments always have used
every available tool to spy on citizens. Until this trumped up money
laundering scare the consensus in western democracies has been that
personal freedom and privacy greatly outweighed prior restrictions
aimed at potential criminal abuse. This established principle rightly
forced police and prosecutors to build each individual case on legally
gathered evidence rather than use the dragnet approach.

But now prosecutors reverse this traditional right to privacy. Instead
of a presumption of innocence, whole classes of people are viewed as
potential criminals based solely on wealth and its free use. Subject to
civil forfeiture, the accused are stripped of their assets and forced
to prove their innocence.

Are these drastic restrictions on financial freedom justified?

Existing anti-ML efforts have proven very costly and highly ineffective.
In the US in 1998, only 932 people were convicted of money laundering,
yet the cost to the private and public sectors exceeded $10 billion,
averaging more than $10 million per conviction. Based on several years
statistics, a British law professor calculated that the UK government
has stopped only 0.004% of the criminal money that flowed through the
City of London. The professor concluded: "Money launderers do not have
a statistically significant chance of being caught, hence the deterrent
effect of such laws is negligible."

The question must be asked: "When is this madness to stop?" No one
should ever have to justify he right to keep their personal business
private, except upon an individual indictment based on specific facts
presented to a court of law.

This financial dragnet must end. A continuing and expanded popular
resistance holds the key to success.
---------
INSATIABLE F.A.T.F DEMANDS
PARIS. After varying appeasement efforts, the 15 "non-cooperative
countries" that the Financial Action Task Force named to its "money
laundering blacklist" in June are told they must do still more.
LINK: http://www.moneylaundering.com/NewsArticleDec004.htm
----------
NAURU'S BILLION DOLLAR BUSINESS
The New York Times claims that the remote Pacific island of Nauru has
found a lucrative niche by learning the trade of money laundering. An
interesting first hand account from the island itself. LINK:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20001210mag-moneylaundering.html
----------
SWISS REPUTATION AT STAKE?
ZURICH. As we have often reported, Switzerland has tightened up
standards relating to the assets of shady characters, concerned about
its own national reputation.
LINK:
http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/articles.html?id=001114001476&query=
offshore#docAnchor001114001476
-----------
SOURCES ON THE NET:
* Money Laundering Alert - good resources and links around the world.
LINK: http://www.moneylaundering.com/
* Money Laundering Compliance - for professionals in law, banking and
financial services and enforcement agencies.
LINK: http://www.countermoneylaundering.com/
* More LINKS: http://www.net-magic.net/users/jlafear/links.html
========================================================================
* OFFSHORE *

BAHAMAS BANK EXODUS BEGINNING?
NASSAU. The head of an offshore bank that lost its license to operate
blamed Bahamas new, stricter laws for his decision to shut down and
liquidate assets.
LINK: http://www.herald.com/content/mon/business/internat/digdocs/038682.htm
----------
FIGHTING THE O.E.C.D. ANTI-TAX HAVEN ATTACK
WASHINGTON, DC. The OECD is intent on stamping out "harmful tax
competition," but an opposition voice is heard from the Center for
Freedom and Prosperity.
LINK:
http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/Articles_on_Tax_Competition/tni12-02-00/tn
i12-02-00.shtml
-----------
B.V.I. PLANS O.E.C.D. APPEASEMENT
ROADS TOWN, BVI. The Finance Minister says the UK overseas territory
will go along with London and OECD demands, beefing up anti-ML laws
and allowing sharing of tax information with foreign governments.
LINK: http://www.tax-news.com/html/oldnews/st_jbvindustry_11_12_00.htm
----------
MAN FINANCIAL PRIVACY UNDER FIRE
DOUGLAS, I.O.M. Under investigation by Irish tax authorities, amid
charges of Russian money laundering, the Isle of Man may compromise
its financial privacy laws.
LINK: http://www.tax-news.com/html/oldnews/st_celticleague_11_12_00.htm
---------
BERMUDA INDEPENDENCE BOOST?
HAMILTON. A leading advocate of Bermuda independence claims the
government in London is pushing the island towards inevitable separation.
LINK:
http://www.bermudasun.bm/cgi-local/edpull.pl?cat=01News&ord=01&ed=2000-12-08

A very useful Web source - all the Online newspapers of the world:
LINK: http://onlinenewspapers.com/

*****************ADVERTISEMENT*********************

THE OFFSHORE MONEY MANUAL:  All about offshore credit cards, IBCs,
trusts, banking and lots more -- the "offshore book of the year" --
360 pages with hundreds of names, contacts, insider stuff; the who,
what, where and when of "offshore" -- information government does NOT
want you to see. Private tips and tested techniques average investors
will never discover; hundreds of offshore direct contacts with e-mail,
phone & fax info. ORDER FROM OUR ONLINE BOOKSTORE at LINK:
http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/OMMD/OMMAL1/
Mail orders to: Sovereign Society, PO Box 1566, Newburgh, NY 12551.
Tel: US (free) 888-358-8125. Fax: 888-892-1542.
NonUS Tel: 353-51-844-068. E-mail: sovereignsociety@compuserve.com
==========================================================
+ WEALTH +

I.R.S. STILL CHASING OFFSHORE TAX CHEATS
After two years of reporting in this e-letter, the general "news"
media finally is catching on to the IRS offshore tax evaders' story.
Example at
LINK:
http://www.nandotimes.com/nation/story/body/0,1037,500288787-500457143-5030114
64-0,00.html
----------
ANTI-ML LAWS USED TO CATCH FOREIGN TAX EVADERS
NEW YORK. A US district court says the government can forfeit bank
accounts (in this case $15.3 million) located in US belonging to accused
foreigners allegedly evading foreign taxes. For a related case, see
US v TRAPILO, at
LINK: http://laws.findlaw.com/2nd/971011.html
----------
U.K. CORRUPTION CRACK DOWN
LONDON. As part of a general crackdown on business and international
corruption, the UK will allow foreign governments to reclaim money
stashed in British banks by corrupt leaders.
LINK:
http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT35CHMKMGC&liv
----------
IRISH TAXES ARE SMILING
DUBLIN. When people think of Ireland, they usually think of leprechauns,
shamrocks and big pints of Guinness, not favorable tax treatment. But
Ireland is one of Europe's great tax havens.
LINK:
http://www.forbes.com/2000/11/17/1117lifestyle.html;$sessionid$24BFT1IAADEUHQF
IAGWCFEY
----------
RUSSIAN FLAT TAX STARTS SOON
MOSCOW. Starting Jan 1, 2001 Russian citizens will enjoy a flat 13%
tax rate on income earned. Some are wondering if it is a genuine
initiative to stimulate the economy or an attempt to lure suspicious
citizens into the Russian tax net.
LINK:
http://www.nationalpost.com/search/story.html?f=/stories/20001207/396427.html
----------
GIBRALTAR ANOTHER OFFSHORE SUICIDE?
Gibraltar is making noises about imposing new taxes to remove the highly
attractive existing discrimination that favors non-residents. In a
misguided quest to appease the OECD's phony demands the Rock could
seriously damage its own financial future.
LINK: http://www.tax-news.com/html/oldnews/st_jgioverhaul_11_12_00.htm
----------
A.I.B. BUYS SWISS BANK
DUBLIN. As we reported, the Sovereign Society's offshore convenient
bank account provider, ANGLO IRISH BANK, will buy a private bank in
Geneva, a significant expansion of AIB's private banking and asset
management operations.
LINK: http://www.independent.ie/2000/341/b02c.shtml

More about the Sovereign Society member's offshore convenient bank
accounts at
LINK: http://www.sovereignsociety.com/Convenient_Offshore_Bank_Accounts.html
----------
DIAMOND SALES BREAK RECORDS
JOHANNESBURG, South Africa. Diamond sales are expected to break all
records this year. Half year sales from De Beers, which has 2/3 of all
diamond sales, were 44% higher at $3.5 billion.
LINK:
http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3OQTHZKGC&liv

*************ADVERTISEMENT**********************
RETIRE OVERSEAS Learn about the world's six best
places to live or retire.  Live like royalty on $14 a day.
Own an exotic beachfront getaway for $35,000. Or
romantic pied-a-terre for under $60,000. Enjoy fine
restaurant dining for $7 per person. Employ a maid or
gardener for $2 a day. Buy comprehensive health
insurance for $20 per month. Get the details in your
FREE report now http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/il/sovsoc4
**************************************************
=======================================================================
* PRIVACY *

ENCRYPTION COUNTERS U.K. SNOOP LAW
LONDON. In six months Britain begins requiring encryption users to
surrender their keys to the government. But cryptographers have new
software that makes enforcement impossible.
LINK: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/15292.html
Check out the software at LINK: http://www.m-o-o-t.org
----------
WIRED PRIVACY NEWS COLLECTION
Your every electronic transaction - Internet e-mail, Web browsing,
online purchases, may be under surveillance. Keep track of Carnivore,
Echelon, and privacy news at Wired magazine's Web site,
LINK: http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/
----------
TELEPHONES ON THE WEB
The Internet's most complete index of online phone books, with over 400
links to Yellow & White Pages, Business Directories, Email Addresses
& Fax Listings from over 170 countries.
LINK: http://www.teldir.com
===============================================================
THE SOVEREIGN SOCIETY OFFSHORE A-LETTER: Bob Bauman, Editor.
Send e-mail to: sovereignsociety@compuserve.com We welcome your
comments. Don't want future mailings? Reply to this e-mail with
"Remove" in the message subject line. SUBSCRIBE FREE or send A-Letter
to a friend at: http://www.sovereignsociety.com/free.html
Back issues at: http://www.sovereignsociety.com/a-letter/index.html
==================================================================
THE SOVEREIGN SOCIETY Ltd, 5 Catherine St, Waterford, Ireland
TEL: 353-51 844 068 FAX: 353-51 304 561
MEMBERSHIP DUES: One year: US$195 / UKo119
JOIN at: http://www.sovereignsociety.com/Home/How_To_Join.html
WEB SITE: http://www.sovereignsociety.com
Copyright (c) 2000. All domestic & international rights reserved.


I'm still concerned about the circularity of the letter indicating that the
GTC will control but then the GTC says the master will control....

David Forster
11/29/99 07:52 PM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Override letter

Bob,

The attached letter format should be used for all of the companies which have
not transacted online yet and for whom we wish the GTC to supercede an
existing master agreement. It has been approved by Mark Taylor.

This can be used for all such companies going forward.

Thanks,

Dave


Bill:

We had a variance in the SAR for the West BOM Book on Friday night.  It was due to a 9 mw purchase from short term cali that was used to fill the lending we have with El Paso Electric.  We in a purchase from the imbalance under the WBOM Book (deal #727440), and built an annuity (deal #72741) where short term cali sold us the 9 MW @ $43.00.  If this is not the correct to remedy the variance please advise me of what to do next time.

Regards,

Bert Meyers


All

On Monday 21st February a new analyst will be joining Enron Europe, and will
have his first rotation in the London Research Group.

Matthew Williams has a PhD in high energy physics, having carried out his
research at Imperial College London and CERN.  His academic experience
includes extensive monte carlo simulation as part of his research on the
phenomenology of supersymmetry theories.

Matthew will be working with me on issues arising from the optimisation and
control of dynamic systems, which we expect to include power generation
scheduling and gas flow.

Steve


Kim,

Thanks a lot. I appreciate your kind words.

Vince

Kimberly Watson@ENRON
01/19/2000 04:46 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: promotion

Vince, I want to congratulate you on your promotion to Managing Director!  As
I scanned the list of people who were promoted, I was so pleased to see your
name on the list.  As large as Enron is, it is refreshing to see people like
you with incredible skill and talent  receive deserving promotions.  I have
certainly enjoyed working with you and the R&D team over the past year and
look forward to a successful 2000 as we break new ground for ET&S.  Kim.


Please see the attached letter to Feinstein.


On Tuesday, May 1 we will begin the migration from Lotus Notes to Microsoft
Outlook.  Your existing emails and folders within Lotus Notes will be
transferred to Outlook without the loss of any data.

The attached spreadsheet indicates migration date by employee. Training for
Outlook will be available Wednesday through Friday.  Currently, training
information is not available, however, we will try to have this information
to the floor on Monday. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Dave Steiner at ext. 3701.


-----Original Message-----
From: ANDRE DeBAR
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 2:10 PM
To: CLARK BROCKMAN; ELLEN HYNSON; ELLEN MORRISON; ERIC LI; MARC LABADIE; MARY
JANE SYMES; NOEL SNODGRASS
Subject: FW: Message from The Dali Lama

This is what The Dali Lama has to say on the millennium, which
>>begins 01/01/2001. All it takes is a few seconds to read and think
>>about.
>>
>>Do not keep this message. The mantra must leave your hands within 96
>>hours. You will get a very pleasant surprise. This is true even if
>>you are not superstitious.
>>
>>Instructions for Life in the new millennium from the Dali Lama:
>>
>>1. Take into account that great love and great achievements
>>involve great risk.
>>
>>2. When you lose, don't lose the lesson.
>>
>>3. Follow the three Rs: Respect for self, respect for others,
>>responsibility for all your actions.
>>
>>4. Remember that not getting what you want is sometimes a
>>wonderful stroke of luck.
>>
>>5. Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
>>
>>6. Don't let a little dispute injure a great friendship.
>>
>>7. When you realize you've made a mistake, take immediate steps to
>>correct it.
>>
>>8. Spend some time alone every day.
>>
>>9. Open your arms to change, but don't let go of your values.
>>
>>10. Remember that silence is sometimes the best answer.
>>
>>11. Live a good, honorable life. Then when you get older and
>>think back, you'll be able to enjoy it a second time.
>>
>>12. A loving atmosphere in your home is the foundation for your
>>life.
>>
>>13. In disagreements with loved ones, deal only with the current
>>situation. Don't bring up the past.
>>
>>14. Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality.
>>
>>15. Be gentle with the earth.
>>
>>16. Once a year, go someplace you've never been before.
>>
>>17. Remember that the best relationship is one in which your love
>>for each other exceeds your need for each other.
>>
>>18. Judge your success by what you had to give up in order to get
>>it.
>>
>>19. Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon.
>>
>>Do not keep this message. The mantra must leave your hands within
>>96 hours. You will get a very pleasant surprise (this is true even if
>>you are not superstitious) if you send it to:
>>
>>0-4 people: Your life will improve slightly.
>>5-9 people: Your life will improve to your liking.
>>9-14 people: You will have at least 5 surprises in the next 3 weeks.
>>15 people and above: Your life will improve drastically and
>>everything you ever dreamed of will begin to take shape

 - ATT00002.txt


Houston Angel Network members:

 HTC is pleased to present Verliant to the Houston Angel Network.
For additional information, please contact Pamela Harris, Founder, of
Verliant.

 Best regards, and as always, your feedback is greatly appreciated.

 Michelle Weisblatt
 Development Manager
 Houston Technology Center
 www.houstontech.org

 Verliant, Inc.
  <<...>>
 Corporations today are confronted with a myriad of laws and
regulations from Federal, State and Local governments. Complying with these
regulations costs companies billions of dollars annually, in direct
compliance costs alone.   Furthermore, the risk of non-compliance is
significant and costs companies both directly, in terms of fines and
litigation, and indirectly in terms of increased insurance premiums.  OSHA,
which is only one of several compliance categories, estimates that companies
spend over $67 million annually--in fines alone.   Litigation and settlement
can cost multiples of the government fines.  Verliant has developed a
web-based, artificial intelligence tool that helps companies maintain
regulatory compliance and successfully manage operational risks. The initial
product focuses on compliance in environmental, health, safety and training.
The technology is developed and has completed a successful beta test with
its first client, Allied Waste Corporation. Contracts have been signed with
initial revenues to occur in January 2001.

 Technology & Product
  * U.S. employers face a multitude of onerous record
keeping and compliance responsibilities. The administrative burden of
maintaining up to date knowledge of, and complying with, regulatory
requirements is significant.
  * Verliant automates key management compliance
processes that were previously ignored or handled manually by employers' HR,
Safety or Legal departments.  Employers recognize significant cost savings
in compliance and substantial decreases in non-compliance.  Likewise,
productivity and the effectiveness of safety programs are enhanced.
  * Applications modules include: Human Resources
(Employee Record Management); Healthcare Compliance Auditing; Medical
Surveillance; Substance Abuse Program Tracking; Training, Evaluation and
Endorsement Tracking; DOT Driver Qualification File Maintenance; Event
Management; Accident and Injury Reporting, Tracking and Analysis; and
Industrial Hygiene.

 Market
  * There are over 6.5 million American firms that must
comply with regulatory standards.
  * OSHA estimates annual compliance costs at $33
billion.

 Marketing Strategy
  * Initial focus will be through direct sales to
Fortune 2000 companies.
  * Pricing is based on a monthly fee of about $2 per
employee.
  * Verliant has signed contracts with Allied Waste and
San-i-Pak.
  * The company plans to implement multi-tiered, direct
sales, distribution model supplemented by resellers with substantial
existing presence within niche target markets.  The company is negotiating
agreements with several resellers in both the medical and waste management
industries.

 Competition
  * Verliant has identified two direct competitors. The
first is Medgate, a privately held Canadian company that offers several
competing modules, but is not yet internet-based. The second is Complient,
which is in development of an internet-based compliance solution,
supplemented by training and safety product sales.
  * Other companies such as J.J. Keller, a privately
held company focused on the Department of Transportation (DOT) solution
only, is not internet-based.
  * A more distant competitor is PureSafety.com, which
focuses only on OSHA Training Tools.
  * Verliant is developing strategic relationships and
marketing alliances with several companies in the medical, waste management,
and PEO industries.

 Competitive Advantages
  * Management Team - The Company's executive management
skills, domain expertise, market knowledge, distribution channels,
intellectual property, and price versus performance are one of its greatest
strengths.
  * Superior Functionality - No competitors offer
Verliant's comprehensive suite of compliance rule-based solutions, on-line
document imaging, or full-service data entry and date loading.
  * ASP Delivery Model - The advantages of the ASP
include easy to use Internet based solutions, proprietary compliance rules
algorithms, and flexible reporting functions.
  * Brand Leadership - The Company's competitive
strategy will be based upon building brand awareness by virtue of its
expertise and the founder's reputation in the occupational health and safety
industry.

 Organizational Information
  Management Team
  * Pamela E. Harris, PhD, President and CEO - Founder
of Verliant. Ph.D. in Environmental Science and a Masters in Public Health,
20 years experience in the safety and health field including VP, Safety and
Health Services at BFI. 3 years on the BOD, National Safety Council.
Recognized as one of the nation's top 50 women executives by the New York
Times.
  * Martin Scheid, VP Business Development (Forte Group
Partner) - MSEE, MBA with 24 years experience in senior management in the
high tech sector, including 15 years with Compaq in business development,
mergers and acquisitions.
  * Jeff Collins, COO (Forte Group Partner) - BSE, MBA
with 16 years of commercial, operational and technology development with
such firms as BP Amoco, where he was VP of Business Development.
  * Ms. Joan Eckerman Jones, MPH - VP Marketing with
over 10 years experience in strategic marketing.
  * Natalie Williams - 15 years experience managing data
quality, interface and input mechanisms, report design and vendor
performance.
  * Deborah Vint - Healthcare Sales - 23 years
experience in the healthcare field, managing clinical practices, as well as,
administrative, technical, and professional staffs.
  * Roger Clayton - IT Manager - 19 years experience
designing and managing database applications.  He has created many Microsoft
based business applications
  Advisory Board
  * Mr. Patrick R. Tyson, JD - Partner, Constangy,
Brooks and Smith; Chairman of the Board of the National Safety Council,
Former Acting Head of OSHA (Reagan Administration).
  * Ms. Susan J. Piller, JD - Vice President and
Associate General Counsel for Waste Management, Inc.
  * Mr. Robert Broun - Principal for 15 years with
Wellington Associates, Inc., a Dallas investment banking firm.

 Financial Projections
  Revenue Model
  * Verliant's revenue model will include sales in both
direct and reseller channels of distribution.
  * Verliant will achieve over $300 million in
cumulative revenues and will attain market penetration goals of up to 20%
during year 5 of operations.

   <<...>>
 Capital
  * The founder has contributed over $600,000 in seed
stage funding.  The company is now seeking $2,000,000 through the issuance
of Series A preferred shares.
  * Funds will be used to support ongoing operating
expenses, technology and web site development, the purchase of business and
computer equipment, and the deployment of sales and marketing plans.
  * Break-even profitability is projected by year-end
2001.

 Contact Information
  * Dr. Pamela Harris, President, Verliant, Inc.
  5715 Whitemills, Houston, Texas 77041-5503
  Ph:(713)466-0829
   Fax:(713)896-4571
   pharris@verliant.com

  <<...>>
 Please note:
 Investments resulting from introductions by HTC may involve a high
degree of risk.  HTC has neither evaluated nor endorsed the merits of any
investment opportunity presented through its services and makes no
recommendations regarding the appropriateness of particular investment
opportunities for particular investors.  Each potential investor must rely
on his or her own judgment regarding the merits of a particular investment
opportunity.


I would have expected you to have received delivery by now.  I am faxing
you a copy and will check with FedEx on the delivery status.
Thanks
Rob Smith
Retail/Alliance Credit Manager
1000 Louisiana Street Suite 5800
Houston, TX 77002
Phone 713.767.6090
Fax 713.767.8772

                    Patrice.L.Mims
                    @enron.com            To:     IMCEANOTES-Rob+2ESmith+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
                                          cc:
                    09/28/01 01:41        Subject:     RE: Guaranty to be issued
                    PM

Hey Rob,

I haven't heard or seen anything yet on the executed contract?  Is
everything okay?  I'll be out of the office traveling next week, and I
wanted to get a status before I left.

Thanks

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Rob.Smith@dynegy.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Rob+2ESmith+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:42 PM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  Guaranty to be issued

   Patrice
   I will be having this signed and sent to you tomorrow morning.  As we
   have
   gone back and forth a few times, please let me know if you see anything
   that does not reflect our final determinations.  I have included both
   the
   redline and the final versions.
   Thanks
   Rob Smith
   Retail/Alliance Credit Manager
   1000 Louisiana Street Suite 5800
   Houston, TX 77002
   Phone 713.767.6090
   Fax 713.767.8772

   (See attached file: EnronFinal.doc)(See attached file: EnronRedline.doc)

    - EnronFinal.doc << File: EnronFinal.doc >>
    - EnronRedline.doc << File: EnronRedline.doc >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I did it!  I finally took a minute to e-mail you.  How are you?  Mom and Dad
just moved to Arkanshire (Retirement Village) this week.  Went over to help
and pick up a load of stuff.  It has been tuff to deal with but know it is a
good idea for them.  Jason is here for a visit, broken hip and all so
between two jobs and all this I am a little "fritzed" at the momment.  Heard
you and I both have a "Jeff" in our lives.  We will have to talk.  Maybe we
can begin communicating a little better. Love you! mb


Effective immediately,   we need to make every effort to avoid buying Malin
P/X energy,   bouncing   this energy off of a NW control area  and sending
back in the ISO to cover our load in NP.   We now have the ability to adjust
bid an SC purchase in NP with the PX.   This allows us to adjust bid to our
load in NP15,  effectively limiting our expense risk to cover load

Leaf Harasin has created a procedure for this process.     Jesse Bryson has
been working on this project as well.

It is important to note that we are experiencing some difficulty with the P/X
as they are not entirely comfortable with this process yet.
Additionally,  we are having some internal software difficulty managing this
new feature.    See David Poston or call Pete Davis for support,  as usual.

Thanks,

JMF


Lou -- you may be maxed out on Franks now.  Don't write a check for the
August fundraiser until you have talked to Eliz Labanowski
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 07/25/2000 02:06
PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Linnell
07/25/2000 01:55 PM
To: Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Lou's $50,000

FYI - Looks like they've already done the distribution.  I didn't ever hear
from Sue Pai Yang, so wasn't able to refer her to Tom Marinis.
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES on 07/25/2000
01:54 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Karen Owens                           07/25/2000 01:47 PM

To: Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Lou's $50,000

Lou's $50,000 was dispursed as follows:

Republican National Committee for Eagle's membership:
$20,000 Sue Pai Yang - Chair of the Republican Task Force of the National
Women's Political Caucus
$15,000 Roselyn O'Connell, President of NWPC

$5,000 - NJ Republican State Commitee
$5,000 - Bob Franks Victory Fund
$5,000 - Asian American Republican Convention


http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/letter_from_america/newsid_216000/21699
4.stm


Norma:

Ted Murphy would like to have Jason removed from his cost center
effective  December 16th.  Vince said that it would be ok to have him
added to our cost center, effective that date.  He is not supposed to start
with the Research Group until the 28th, but needs a home from the 16th to
the 28th, so we will pick him up.

Can you take care of this?

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290


-----Original Message-----
From:  "Dan Salter" <dsalter@hgp-inc.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Dan+20Salter+22+20+3Cdsalter+40hgp-inc+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@
ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Herndon, Rogers; Imai, Rika; Will, Lloyd; Presto, Kevin; Harry Aurora;
Fletch Sturm; Dana Davis; Gilbert-Smith, Doug
Subject: 4 month rolling forecast

Since I will be attending an NRC meeting tomorrow, I am  sending the 4 Month
Rolling Forecast for this week today.  Attached are the  two files containing
the report.

Dan
 - 010521 update.doc
 - 010521 update.xls


I'm there.  I'm out Friday.  Also, Molly will be full time CES starting next
week.

Kim, please reserve a room for a conference call for one hour starting at
11:00 am this Thursday.

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           03/28/2000 12:49 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

Chris--FYI--are you available for a meeting Thursday, March 30 at 11:00 a.m.
to discuss these issues?  If so, will you ask Kim to get a room for us for
about an hour?

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
12:47 PM ---------------------------

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/28/2000 12:34:07 PM
To: " - *colleen.sullivan@enron.com" <colleen.sullivan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

Colleen,

Attached is an updated storage proxy schedule for COH and AGL showing what our
balance will be as of April 1, 2000.  As always, if you have any questions,
please let me know.  I'm sending a copy of the document to Denny Pick for
signature and will then send it to Jeff Hodge to get signature from Enron.

Aside from the storage issue, there are several other items that we need to
discuss.  Below is a brief description of each.  Please let me know how you
think we could best deal with these - whether it's via phone call or having an
in-person meeting down in your office.

1.  Pricing - I left you a message about this last week.  According to Chris
Germany, all changes to volumes after first-of-the-month must me negotiated.
In the contract, however, it specifically refers to pricing intra-month using
gas daily OR negotiated pricing depending on the timing of the change.

2.  Consistency - During our discussions with Chris, it sounds as though some
pipes are being handled differently than others again as it relates to
intra-month changes.  I'd just like to make sure that we agree on the pricing
mechanism and then apply it consistently.

3.  Local production - Apparently there was local production that John Singer
purchased specifically to back Retail customers, and this production was not
removed from the Wholesale book prior to the sale.  We need to discuss how to
handle this production.

4.  Monthly invoices - We still haven't seen the complete January 2000
invoice.  As I understand it, the demand charges have not all been sent over,
and several items that need to be changed haven't yet been changed.  Also,
Brian Perrone and Charlie Dalphon have indicated that they have requested
back-up documentation on the demand charges, but we still haven't received
anything.

5.  Swap confirmations - For all of the swaps that Clay Deaton put in place
with Enron to keep Retail's existing hedge positions in tact, I still do not
have executed copies of all of the confirmation agreements.  Rich Contos and I
have both called several people about getting a complete set of copies, but we
can't seem to find the right person over there.

Whenever you have time to discuss these, please let me know.

Thanks,

Melissa


Attached is a redline of the Bisti Assignment in Contribution Agreement (ECC
to ECS).  This version picks up a change in the indemnity section that was
missed in the version e-mailed earlier.  This change will be made in all 4
Assignment and Contribution Agreements.


Ben,

Another issue I have in my mind is how we handle revenue after 3 and 5 years.
Since Calpine will have only 3 or 5 year tolling agreement, it is appropriate
to assume Calpine's revenue will come purely from market. Therefore, we may
just need one line of revenue, rather than breaking into capacity payment and
energy payment. Let's talk to Scott when he gets back to Houston.

Jinsung

Benjamin Rogers@ECT
02/23/2000 05:14 PM
To: Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: calpine model

Yes I am working on that with Bruce Golden to reduce that.  It should be more
like 5 to 6 months for the construction.
Ben


I won't be able to attend the forum since I am travelling but do have a
suggestion that would make TAP a bit more attractive.  When a traveller is
placed on a "wait list" the agency should check back with the provider
regularly and often to see if the wait can be cleared.  If you wait for the
provider to get back to you, as appears to be TAP's policy, the chances are
significantly reduced since the provider will almost invariably clear the
person on the phone before anyone on the list.  Other agents have done this
for me, I have done this for myself, and it works.


I have you down as a "yes" to attend the meeting.

      Maureen McVicker
      (Steve's assistant)

Diomedes Christodoulou@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/07/99 07:23 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Sept. 16 & 17 Enron Advisory Council Mtg.

Steve,

Ca you please include me in this also? I'd like to hear their views on south
America. Thanks.

Steven J Kean@EES
09/07/99 04:22 PM
Sent by: Maureen McVicker@EES
To: Executive Committee, Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Executive Committee Assistants, Kelly Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Sept. 16 & 17 Enron Advisory Council Mtg.

Please see the attached memo regarding the Enron Advisory Council Meeting
scheduled for

September 16 & 17.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 07:13 PM -----

	Treasa Kirby
	11/16/2000 10:10 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: ).

Master attached below.

---------------------- Forwarded by Treasa Kirby/LON/ECT on 16/11/2000 16:12
---------------------------

Treasa Kirby
15/11/2000 10:28
To: Matthew Landy/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: ).

---------------------- Forwarded by Treasa Kirby/LON/ECT on 15/11/2000 10:31
---------------------------

London Fax System
10/11/2000 17:07
To: Treasa Kirby/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: ).

You have received a new fax from

The image contains 31 page(s).


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042023.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_4000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_4001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred: -700.00 / Final: -699.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TRADING_SC: WESC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 2:52 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Huber LOI

Please see the attached redlined version


have you checked Las Vegas???
We can go for$1000.00 (minus the flight value)


Cool--my law beanie is getting a little tight lately.  Stan communicated to
Oneok that we want to keep the dialogue going and that arbitrating the
measurement issue is necessary so we can clear it out of the way and allow
everyone to focus on bigger issues.  I don't know if they bought it, but if
we approach them (maybe at the Stan level) with potential business deals it
will tend to validate the message Stan sent them.  We haven't heard anything
since we launched the arbitration on Friday, so I'm not sure if they are
ballistic or not.  Given Stan's message to them (Kathy--pls forward Stan's
letter to Jeff) I think he ought to either raise the West Texas line himself
or else tee it up by calling his counterparts and letting them know what were
up to so there is no confusion.  Maybe you or Harris could bring it up at the
Mon. meeting or sooner if necessary.   Let me know if you want me involved in
that conversation.  Thanks. df

From: Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate on 02/27/2001 02:54 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Pemex-Enron Project

Drew,
Here's a chance to wear your honorary Marketing beanie.  If you read the note
below, we're engaged in very preliminary conversations with PEMEX with the
idea that maybe TW/NNG could offer a viable alternative to EPNG to move gas
into Mexico through the Samalayuca lateral (commencement point located
approx. 50 miles east of the city of El Paso).  New construction would
involve approx. 150 miles of pipeline and associated compression to tie into
the existing TW/NNG systems near Waha.  Notwithstanding PEMEX's desire to
move off EPNG for a portion of the load, I don't think the economics will
work.

However, KN Energy (now Kinder) used to own a line they acquired through
Westar (they acquired it from El Paso Products Co.) that runs from Waha
westward to a point near the city of El Paso.  It's primarily a 20" line, and
it currently serves El Paso Electric Co. and several directly connected
industrial customers.  As a KN operation, it typically didn't run full.  I
see the acquisition of this line as one possible way we could serve both the
existing markets as well as incremental volumes to PEMEX at a rate that might
work for them.  I completely spaced on the fact that Kinder sold many of its
south system assets (including this West Texas line) to Oneok last year.  If
we are to pursue this idea, then we're forced to dealing with Oneok.

I know that we're in deep dog poo with Oneok right now regarding Bushton.  My
question is, are we in any kind of position to talk to Oneok about this
asset, considering  the legal status of our dispute at Bushton?  Also, does
our desire (potentially) to own this asset create any kind of negotiating
currency with Oneok on the Bushton issue?

I'd appreciate your thoughts.  We're due to have Pemex in our offices next
week.   Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Fawcett, Jeffery
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:19 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Scott, Susan; Matthews, Ronald; Robertson, Audrey;
Schoolcraft, Darrell; Faucheaux, Eric; Gottsponer, Morgan
Subject: Pemex-Enron Project
Importance: High

Pemex has approached Transwestern with the idea of Transwestern building an
interconnecting pipeline between the current EPNG/Samaluyca interconnect at
EPNG's Hueco compressor station and TW's facilties in West Texas.   Pemex has
indicated they might move as much as 300,000 MMCf/d on the lateral, although
the email below shows increments to only 200,000 MMCf/d.  Pemex is well aware
of the fact that the lateral will not be an inexpensive proposition, but they
claim to see another supply option (other than EPNG) as necessary,
particularly in light of EP Merchant's behavior regarding their ownership of
the large 1.2 Bcf/d block of EPNG capacity.

To this end, I've arranged a meeting (originally set for Mexico City, now in
Houston) to sit down face to face with Pemex and discuss this project.
They'd like us to be a specific as possible and set the email below to assist
us in our design considerations.

I see this project being one of possibly two separate projects.  First, we
could re-establish a dialogue with Kinder Morgan to see if they'd be
interered in talking to us about an ownership position in their West Texas
line.  Secondly, we could build new pipe to TW/NNG.

With respect to NNG, I think there's definitely an opportunity to promote the
use of the NNG South end as a potential supply/services source.  Not only
does NNG have a full range of storage and line pack services, but they could
possibly bring Trailblazer gas from the Rockies down to serve this load.

Audrey, if you would, please set us up for meeting here in Houston on Friday,
March 9, 2001 beginning at 9:00 a.m.  We need a conference room for about 10
people from 9-12.  I'd like a coffee/juice/rolls setup for this meeting if
possible.  Also, check with me as time draws near and we can arrange a place
to take them to lunch.  I think we can finish our business with them at lunch
time and make plans for our next steps.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  jrojas [mailto:jrojas@gas.pemex.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 7:54 PM
To: Jeffery.Fawcett
Cc: lpadilla
Subject: Pemex-Enron Project
Importance: High

Jeff,

As we talk this morning we are interested on developing a new project
with your company that could take gas into EPNG,s Hueco compressor
station located in Hudspeth County, Texas.

The preliminary information we can give you in order to move forward
with the project is this:

Receipt point:                            Transwestern and NNG
Delivery point-                            Hueco Compress Station
Delivery Pressure-                      840 psi
Volume                                     100,150 and 200 MMBTU/day
Term                                         10,15 and 20 years.

The information we would like to receive from you is:

1.         Permissions you will need to get in order to build the
interconnection FERC, RRC, EPNG, others (timing for those permissions)
2.         Time to build the interconnection
3.         As we understand, you as interstate pipeline need to post the
capacity at the EBB, how much time would it take?
4.         Rates and fuel charges that apply for all your system
(Transwestern and NNG)
5.         Estimated cost for the new interconnection facilities.
6.         Supply areas that we can access
7.         Storage Facilities

We hope that with this information you can run your first numbers about
how we can make this project work and we can have some distance walked
for our upcoming meeting on march 9th, 2001

Thank you in advance for the help and if you have any question don,t
hesitate to give me a call.

Sincerely yours(

Jorge F. Rojas Zepeda
Natural Gas Marketing Transportation
MGI Supply, Ltd.
An affiliate of Pemex Gas y Petroqu?mica B?sica
Phone: 525-232-59-87
mailto:jrojas@gas.pemex.com

 - WINMAIL.DAT


Louise:

I wanted to make sure you were aware of the current situation with Eletrobolt.  With respect to the current liquidity issues, we are working to extend the WestLB facility over year-end to give us cushion with respect to the OPIC financing.  The potential exposures depending on when WestLB has to be taken out, when OPIC funds and when equity syndication occurs is outlined below.  Please let me know what other questions I can answer or if you would like to discuss the specifics further.  My cell phone number is (5511) 9233-7428.

Thanks,
Brett
---------------------- Forwarded by Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron on 10/30/2001 08:32 PM ---------------------------

Brett R Wiggs
10/28/2001 11:16 AM
To:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Ranabir Dutt/Enron@EnronXGate, Joseph M Deffner@ECT
Subject:	Re: Eletrobolt

John:

We still do not have a deal with the government.  They have delayed giving us a written proposal over the last two weeks.  The latest is that they have said that they will give us something on Tuesday of next week.

With respect to the burn rate, we are projecting about $20 million in expenditures over the next month.  Our current investment is about $220 million.

I think you should also have a rough idea of how we are funding this and what the plan is over the next couple of months.  The investment is currently funded through an off-balance sheet / on-credit vehicle with WestLB.  The WestLB vehicle is structured to fund the plant through commercial operations.  The plan is to have the OPIC financing in place to take out the WestLB vehicle.  This would infer an approximate $95 million equity investment upon the take-out of the WestLB vehicle.  We are currently in the process of syndicating the equity.  We have one indicative proposal for 50% of the equity.  We hope to have another next week.

There are some specific timing issues that you need to be aware of.  WestLB did not want to take operating risk in the financing.  Our position with WestLB is that we do not reach  commercial operations until we reach the start date of the Petrobras contract.  We are currently producing energy into the grid.  At some point, WestLB could try to force us to take out the entire vehicle prior to the OPIC funding.  Depending upon the timing, this could represent a cash flow of up to $280 million for a short period of time.

Please let me know what other questions you have.

Brett

From:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/26/2001 02:10 PM CDT
To:	Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:

did we sell the power to the government?

What is our cash burn on the project right now and over the next month?

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Sunil,

I just checked my messages this morning....I didn't think people could leave messages anymore after I was put on a trading phone but low and behold they can.  If you ever want to get a hold of me in the future, the best bets are email and cell phone (713-775-6472).

I'd be happy to chat with you if you still need to.  Just let me know a time and place and I'm there.

Susan


Plse  have fax delivered home.

Today is the day.  I have been a mom for 21 years.  Can't be true.

Still on conference call.  Ben has been very nice.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/07/2001 02:46 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: David Marshall

Is today Paige's birthday or tomorrow.  Of course if it was great news, then
it could be a celebratory drink.  I told Ric I may come by for a drink, but I
didn't know yet.  I think I'll call and get exact directions.

Do you need this fax I got from King and Spalding with comments on Midway?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 02:43 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: David Marshall

No news today.  I don't want to know today, as I'm drinking champagne and
ignoring the issue,


Attached are filings made this week at FERC to seek permission for EPMI and
EES to make certain FERC-required filings (including quarterly power marketer
filings) on behalf of industrials with on site generation that sell power
into the grid to us.  The filings will allow Enron to make it easier for
these industrials to sell to us from their administrative filing viewpoint.
We expect to receive authorization within 60 days.

Generally, industrials with on site generation are required to obtain a FERC
power marketer license and comply with FERC's reporting requirements, similar
to EPMI and EES' FERC filing requirements.  EPMI and EES will be able to file
specific industrial purchases in a combined report, rather than requiring the
industrials to file their separate reports with FERC.

Please contact me if you plan a deal to purchase power from an industrial.
We need to consider additional costs/back office transaction flags that may
be required in order for us to track these purchases.  Thanks.  Christi
37007.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001
05:34 PM ---------------------------

"Karen Bishop" <kbishop@bracepatt.com> on 03/05/2001 04:58:18 PM
To: <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <elinnell@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>,
<editor@restructuringtoday.com>
cc:

Subject: Today's filings

 - #133268 v2 - APPLICATION FOR MBR PURCHASES FROM IPPS.wpd
 - #137355 v1 - EES APPLICATION FOR MBR FOR IPPS.wpd


MARK YOUR CALENDAR - Back by popular demand!

Ziff Energy Group presents the

2002 Gas Storage Conference
February 6-7 in Houston

This popular Gas Storage Conference has been expanded to a two-day event and includes an exciting agenda that will not be found at any other conference.  Featuring:

Storage supply/demand update

New storage projects

New storage pricing scenarios

New storage technology

The latest about Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) facilities

Special workshops

Storage Project displays

Watch for the detailed agenda to be released in November, and frequently visit www.ziffenergyconferences.com for updated information.

If you would like to participate as a sponsor or partner, please contact Debralee Fernets at 265-0600


Becky --

My only question is one of emphasis.  Are points 3&4 the key for Barry T.?  If so, should we move them up higher?  Also, why the very lenghthy discussion of pooling points?  The length makes the points after that discussion hard to appreciate.  Maybe a list of bullet points up front?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:27 PM
To:	Alvarez, Ray; Comnes, Alan; Frank, Robert; Gahn, Scott; Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Perrino, Dave; Sharp, Greg; Shireman, Kristann; Smith, Matt; Steffes, James D.; Stoness, Scott; Thome, Jennifer; Walton, Steve; Allen, Phillip K.; Black, Don; Calcagno, Suzanne; Courtney, Mark; Dasovich, Jeff; Ermis, Frank; Fulton, Donna; Gay, Randall L.; Grigsby, Mike; Hewitt, Jess P.; Holst, Keith; Kaufman, Paul; Kuykendall, Tori; Mara, Susan; McMichael Jr., Ed; Miller, Stephanie; Nicolay, Christi L.; Smith, Matt; Sullivan, Patti; Superty, Robert; Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	PLEASE RESPOND BY FRIDAY, 10/5 -- El Paso Comments RP00-336

Please review the attached filing and provide any comments you may have by COB Friday, 10/5.

The filing is ENA's comments on El Paso's proposal for receipt point allocation, focusing on discussions at the two technical conferences in the proceeding.  Also, it may be that, based on further discussion with certain other shippers, we will modify our statement in Item No. 1 to to support a different version of the method for allocating receipt point rights, but only if there is strong opposition to our method.  We don't want FERC to select the method that El Paso proposed originally.

   << File: RP00-336-002 Conf Comments Drft8.doc >>


Start Date: 1/16/02; HourAhead hour: 22;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011622.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Prebon Energy has sent you an invitation from Sendomatic.com!

To view your invitation click the web address below or copy and paste it into your web browser:
http://www.sendomatic.com/servlets/v?e=61945&u=742518

If you are having trouble viewing the above web address, visit
http://www.sendomatic.com/servlets/l?u=mike.carson@enron.com
and create an account to view the events you have received.

Hope you have fun!

--

P.S. If you'd like to send your own personalized invitations or announcements go to http://www.sendomatic.com


Start Date: 1/12/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011220.txt


I have reviewed, initialed and now forwarded the Amendment and file back to you.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Stephanie Panus 05/21/2001 04:11 PM 	   To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: AEP Master Amendments

Cheryl,
Sara wanted me to check on the AEP amendment that you are reviewing regarding the confirming party.
----- Forwarded by Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron on 05/21/2001 04:10 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton@ECT 05/21/2001 03:59 PM 	   To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: AEP Master Amendments

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 03:59 PM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter 05/21/2001 03:28 PM 	   To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: AEP Master Amendments

Mark/Sara,

We are attempting to get two amendments to the ISDA with AEP right now.  Mark, you are working on the Amendment allowing for EOL Transactions to not need written Confirmations and Sara is working on an amendment that will change the Confirming Party to ENA (for some reason, AEP was allowed to be the Confirming Party when the Master was drafted.)   At any rate, is it possible that we send both of these amendments to AEP at the same time?  We want to make sure that AEP views these amendments together and sign off on both.  We think they'll be more comfortable signing them both at once rather than a couple of weeks apart.

Let me know.

Thanks,
Joe Hunter


Sounds good.  The email was a good idea, also.


Dear Ward:
As requested, I will serve on this board.
Leo Linbeck, Jr.
From: Patricia Hendrix <patricia.m.hendrix@uth.tmc.edu>
Organization: Division of Cardiology
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:11:50 -0500
To: Preston Moore <pmoore@wcamerica.com>, Willerson James <james.t.willerson@uth.tmc.edu>, "S. Ward Casscells" <s.ward.casscells@uth.tmc.edu>, jtn <jtn@casinc-investigations.com>, epd <epd@rice.edu>, james_eastham <james_eastham@mhhs.org>, morris_flaum <morris_flaum@ucplus.org>, "david.persse" <david.persse@cityofhouston.net>, "carlos.r.hamilton" <carlos.r.hamilton@uth.tmc.edu>, rew <rew@texmedctr.tmc.edu>, steve_allen <steve_allen@mhhs.org>, "john.porretto" <john.porretto@uth.tmc.edu>, jmendelsohn <jmendelsohn@mdanderson.org>, "jack.lynch" <jack.lynch@sleh.org>, mjhin <mjhin@sleh.org>, L Maximilian Buja <L.Maximilian.Buja@uth.tmc.edu>, cborder <cborder@bakerbotts.com>, dan_wilford <dan_wilford@mhhs.org>, "robert.j.emery" <robert.j.emery@uth.tmc.edu>, kmattox <kmattox@bcm.tmc.edu>, lschroth <lschroth@tmh.tmc.edu>, mawallac <mawallac@texaschildrenshospital.org>, pbutler <pbutler@tmh.tmc.edu>, Kent Cavender <Kent.Cavender@uth.tmc.edu>, James H Duke <James.H.Duke@uth.tmc.edu>, Patricia L Starck <Patricia.L.Starck@uth.tmc.edu>, Steven D Brown <Steven.D.Brown@uth.tmc.edu>, smitha <smitha@tirr.tmc.edu>, rfeigin <rfeigin@bcm.tmc.edu>, hrietz <hrietz@texmedctr.tmc.edu>, mgillis <mgillis@rice.edu>, plc8888 <plc8888@aol.com>, hjefferson <hjefferson@protectorsinsurance.com>, jlemond <jlemond@lj-law.com>, tmindiola <tmindiola@uh.edu>, dpersse <dpersse@hfd.ci.houston.tx.us>, rmcnair <rmcnair@cogentech.com>, president <president@stthom.edu>, rcruiksh <rcruiksh@aol.com>, james_white <james_white@co.harris.tx.us>, frank_gutierrez <frank_gutierrez@co.harris.tx.us>, "mark.guidry" <mark.guidry@tdh.state.tx.us>, cbuu <cbuu@hd.co.harris.tx.us>, ENTRECORP <ENTRECORP@CCSI.COM>, ROSEVALENZUELA <ROSEVALENZUELA@CITYOFHOUSTON.NET>, cwchu <cwchu@uh.edu>, leo_jr <leo_jr@linbeck.com>, mperrin <mperrin@swbell.net>, jmsolar <jmsolar@solarlaw.com>, wongmartha <wongmartha@hotmail.com>, fzeidman <fzeidman@endurosys.com>, anderson_Sx <anderson_Sx@tsu.edu>, "bill.archer" <bill.archer@us.pwcglobal.com>, mandrews <mandrews@velaw.com>, eattwell <eattwell@velaw.com>, daviles <daviles@avilesengineering.com>, charles_bacarisse <charles_bacarisse@dco.co.harris.tx.us>, rbasnagoda <rbasnagoda@yahoo.com>, mabob <mabob@uh.edu>, donaldburgs <donaldburgs@hotmail.com>, "peter.coneway" <peter.coneway@gs.com>, dcooley <dcooley@heart.thi.tmc.edu>, jdd <jdd@dannenbaum.com>, robert_eckels <robert_eckels@co.harris.tx.us>, libbyc <libbyc@tamu.edu>, "claire.farley" <claire.farley@trade-ranger.com>, bill <bill@hobbycomm.com>, pwhobby <pwhobby@hobbycomm.com>, kann <kann@pdq.net>, "ann.kennedy" <ann.kennedy@houstonsymphony.org>, bkhumawala <bkhumawala@uh.edu>, jkollaer <jkollaer@houston.org>, laboon <laboon@lockeliddell.com>, klay <klay@enron.com>, "glevco.yahoo.com" <glevco.yahoo.com@uth.tmc.edu>, info <info@galleryfurniture.com>, robertmosbacher <robertmosbacher@compuserve.com>, "ferid.murad" <ferid.murad@uth.tmc.edu>, snewton <snewton@russellreynolds.com>, poxford <poxford@bracaepatt.com>, "kathy.perkins" <kathy.perkins@tdh.state.tx.us>, jdreynolds <jdreynolds@christchurchcathedral.org>, gstrake <gstrake@strake.org>, "chase.untermeyer" <chase.untermeyer@compaq.com>, dunderw <dunderw@firstunion1.com>, bwhite <bwhite@wedgegroup.com>, waltercwilson <waltercwilson@prodigy.net>, iwilson <iwilson@swbell.net>
Subject: DISASTER RELIEF ADVISORY BOARD
Dear Defense of Houston members,
    Thank you for the nominations of new members, incl exec board members. That group  now includes James A. Baker,III, Kirbyjohn Caldwell, Ward Casscells, Red Duke, Dick Ewing, RAlph Feigin, Ken Lay, John Mendelsohn, David Persse, Dick Wainerdi, Dan Wilford, and Jim Willerson.
    Please see   the website http://www.defenseofhouston.org for the complete membership list, relevant links, recent articles, and a bulletin board.        The mayor has asked Pastor Caldwell, Drs Willerson, Wainerdi, Duke, Feigin and me to meet tomorrow about this issue. Details soon. Suggestions welcome. Those of you have not yet RSVP'd as to membership please do so as soon as possible.
                                                             Best, Ward


FYI,

I have all your drafts completed,  I just need to proof read one more time.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Please call if you have any changes.

Thanks,
Joannie
3-1769


hope you enjoyed france.
MRC

Oct. 2, 2000, 11:58PM

Houston Heights Association presents deed restriction proposal

By MARTIN HAJOVSKY
Home in the Heights

After more than a year of work, the Houston Heights Association's board
of directors last month accepted a set of proposed revisions to the
Heights' deed restrictions. The revisions are intended to severely
curtail prospective townhome and other new construction considered by
the association to be inappropriate to the historic nature and character
of the area.

Just over 20 percent of Houston Heights properties are currently
protected by the deed restriction documents, first drafted by the
association more than 20 years ago. The updates are necessary in order
to keep pace with current threats to the neighborhood, according to
association President Allan Tiller.

"When the restriction documents were first drafted, the perceived threat
was from commercial intrusion, having a business set up next to your
home," he said. "Now with the rise in property values, that's not as
much of a threat. What is a threat is the possibility that townhomes
with their canyons of garage doors up and down the street will replace
the essential character of the neighborhood with a level of density that
is inappropriate."

Tiller is not dismayed by the fact that after two decades of work, only
a minority of area homeowners have signed on.

"Certainly we want this to extend to everyone in the neighborhood and
we're working to do that," he said. "But just the fact that you have it
and it's publicized means that it becomes kind of a guideline for the
neighborhood, and builders and developers are still reluctant to go in
and change that or build anything contrary to that. That's been my
experience."

The proposed revisions deal with eight major areas in new construction
dealing with design, density and placement, but not use, of properties.

? Setbacks -- A house or structure would have to leave at least three
feet, increased from the current two, on the sides, three feet from the
back and 15 feet from the front. Corner lots would have the 15-foot
setback apply on both sides facing a street (similar to the city's
10-foot front setback rule).

? Front-facing construction -- Any new house will have to face the
street rather than a common private driveway to prevent multiple-unit
"compound"-type construction.

? Common wall construction -- Although the association board feels that
the setback rules should generally prevent common-wall construction (two
units sharing a common exterior wall), this provision was put in to help
ensure that the prohibition is not circumvented by multiple-unit
construction on a single lot, such as apartments.

? Garage setback -- The new restrictions would require that any garage
facing the street be set back at least halfway to the back lot line, and
in any event be no closer to the street than the front of the house
itself. This is the case throughout the Heights currently, where garages
are generally unseen from the street, as opposed to the newer townhome
styles found throughout the Montrose area and the West End near Memorial
Park.

? Garage-dominated front -- A new provision would mandate that a
front-facing garage door could not take up more than a half of the
first-floor front of the house, a direct blow at the most common
townhome styles.

? Raised foundations -- Preserving another dominant characteristic of
home construction in the Heights, the new restrictions would require
either pier-and-beam construction, or other foundation construction that
would raise the bottom floor of the house at least 2 feet from the
ground. There are currently no townhome styles in Montrose or the West
End that have raised construction of any kind.

? Height restrictions -- The revisions would retain the current height
restriction of 40 feet, except that for lots of width greater than 50
feet, the limit would go up an additional foot for every 2 feet of
additional setback from the nearest lot line. The point of this is to
maintain the general Heights practice of no more than two stories in a
single family dwelling.

? Density and lot width -- The minimum lot size would be increased from
one residence per every 2,500 square feet to one per every 5,000 square
feet, and there would be a minimum frontage of 50 feet for each lot.
This would essentially establish a minimum lot size of 50 feet by 100
feet. This would represent a major break from the past. When the Heights
was originally laid out in the 1890s, lots were considered to be
generally no wider than 25 feet and houses occupied two or more of these
lots. However, throughout the area, examples abound of homes constructed
on 25-foot-wide lots only.

Recognizing that situation, there would be two important exceptions to
the new density and lot width requirements. First, garage apartments
would not be treated as "residences" for this purpose. Second, lots of
smaller frontage or size with existing houses as of the date of adoption
of the revisions or other fixed date (to be determined) would be
"grandfathered." That is, their size would be treated as conforming to
the deed restrictions.

A bracketed bill enacted by the Texas Legislature in 1999, applying only
to the Heights, created a means by which the deed restrictions could be
changed, setting the stage for these revisions. However, the alteration
process is something that in itself could take many months, according to
Tiller.

There are three methods by which the restrictions can be changed,
according to the bracketed law. First, a ballot could be mailed or
delivered to each qualified property owner, that is, those who have
already signed the deed restriction documents. Adoption of the revisions
would require an affirmative vote of 75 percent of those submitting a
ballot.

Second, a petition could be mailed or otherwise sent out to all
signed-on owners. Adoption would require the signature of 75 percent of
the owners.

The third, and as Tiller pointed out by far the easiest, method would be
to call a meeting of signed-on property owners. Adoption would require
the affirmative vote of 75 percent of those attending the meeting.

"Obviously what we would prefer to do is to hold the meeting because
it's the easiest thing to do," he said. "We would send out the notice to
everyone, see who shows up and pretty much do it all in one fell swoop.
Also, the group that would be most excited about the issue would be
those attending the meeting."

However, Tiller said that no one on the board or the association's Land
Use Committee, which originally drafted the proposed revisions, wants to
enact any change to any document without ensuring that the entire
community supports such a move.

"The number one priority is to build a consensus of support for the
proposals," he said. "We are in the public education phase of the
campaign. Before there's any kind of vote taken there's going to be a
mailer to everyone that we have on our list who own deed restricted
properties. That's going to be a hassle trying to track all those people
down, but we need to do that.

"The statute requires that notice be sent to all restricted property
owners. What steps do you need to take in order to satisfy that? We'll
take every practical step we can, and we'll record we did that. But
that's another technical issue we have to deal with.

"First and foremost, our goal is finding out whether or not we have the
consensus to do this."

Tiller did acknowledge the difficulty inherent in building that
consensus with the association's all-volunteer work force.

"With the petition it's my understanding you'd need 75 percent of
everyone," he said. "That appeals to me because that means we've got as
broad a consensus as possible. But that's a lot of work. With an
all-volunteer process that might be too much.

"In any event we'll be sending out a notice to everyone probably more
than once. The technical issues of presenting the proposals to the
neighborhood have to be worked out."

Protecting the historic quality of the neighborhood, Tiller said, is the
main goal of the restriction documents. As such, it coincides with a
similar effort to seek historic district status from the city of
Houston, an effort that still hasn't yet gotten off the ground in the
Houston Heights despite the awarding of the status to the neighboring
community of Norhill to the east. Tiller acknowledged the similarities
in goals, but noted that the deed restrictions have a much tighter
focus.

"The deed restrictions really apply to new construction rather than
preserving what's already on the ground," he said. "We could have
extended it to preserving issues as well, but we did not want to
overload this particular issue of stopping townhouse construction with
the preservation issue as well. It will be a similar process, building a
consensus and going to the homeowners to do that. Here initially we have
a much more limited group we have to address though, which is the
qualified property owners."

The Houston Heights Association board of directors will focus on this
issue at its next meeting, to be held at 6:30 p.m. Oct. 16, at the Fire
Station at the corner of West 12th and Yale.

For additional comment or more information about the deed restrictions,
check out a copy of the current document online at the Heights
Association's Web site at www.houstonheights.org/deedrestrictions.htm
<http://www.houstonheights.org/deedrestrictions.htm>. Also on the site
is a list of all deed restricted properties in the Heights. For more
information through non-computer means, call the Houston Heights
Association's main telephone number at 713-861-4002.

______________________________________________________________
Gordon Hagendorf
Kvaerner E&C
gordon.hagendorf@kvaerner.com

713 270-2450 Phone
713 270-2990 Fax


Please see below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 04/24/2000
08:29 AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
04/21/2000 07:56 AM
To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Reg. Information - Interconnecting Generation in the East

Please forward to entire group- This is an example of an outstanding memo
that conveys critical information to our commercial counterparts- to the
point and very relevant-- it is a model to emulate.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 04/21/2000
07:53 AM ---------------------------
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney
Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, James A Ajello/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kellie Metcalf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, David L
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie Chance/Corp/Enron@Enron, Oscar
Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund
Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Hoppe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey M
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, George
McCormick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clay Spears/HOU/ECT@ECT, Webb Jennings/HOU/ECT@ECT, W
David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, James L
Noles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Art
Bieser/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Howe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cuthbert
Roberts/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney
C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Reg. Information - Interconnecting Generation in the East

This is a brief primer to assist you with current policy regarding
interconnecting generation plants in the East.  Please forward this to your
groups.  Thanks.  Christi Nicolay 37007  EB3108h.  I am available for your
federal/FERC regulatory questions and can point you to the correct
state/regional regulatory people.

When initially deciding where to site a plant, there are several federal
regulatory issues to consider:

First, you will need to obtain the utility's interconnection policy and a pro
forma interconnection agreement from the utility.  For most utilities, you
will need to call them to obtain their policy and agreement.  Some utilities
have this available on their OASIS computer site or web page.  The OASIS
sites have areas that do not require a password, but if the information is
not available in that area, you should contact the power trading desk
transmission personnel to assist in locating the information.  If a utility
says it does not have a policy, you can let me know.

The interconnection procedures typically require you to send in a request for
the utility to study the interconnection (Typically, app. $10,000).  When you
return the money and the request (which is usually an agreement that must be
initialled by ENA legal), the project will be placed in the "queue."  The
queue is usually available on the OASIS.  If the utility does not post the
queue, let me know.

Many times the procedures require the project to meet "milestones" in order
to remain in the queue.  If the milestones look unreasonable, let me know.

FERC (the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) recently issued an order
(Tennessee Power case) in which FERC stated that asking for "interconnection"
is separate from a request for "transmission" under a utility's Open Access
Transmission Tariff (OATT).  Enron and others had lobbied FERC to issue an
order dealing with interconnection.  Many utilities will try to charge
additional "network upgrade" costs, not simply the costs to interconnect.
This is not allowed under the new FERC rule (Note: PJM and NEPOOL have
different rules due to their pool structure).

In addition, in the Tennessee Power case, FERC stated that utilities are
required to abide by certain timelines during the interconnection study
process.  Generally, these timelines are in the attachment below.  Most of
the interconnection policies I have seen have timelines significantly longer
than what FERC is now requiring.  You should probably first call the utility
to ask if they are planning to revise the deadlines to comply with FERC's new
order.  If that doesn't work, you can call me.

There are several utilities that have filed their interconnection procedures
at FERC:  PJM, NEPOOL, Ameren, Entergy, ComEd.  Enron is actively protesting
Entergy's proposed procedures and interconnection agreement (a FERC order is
expected 4/26/00).  In addition, ComEd's procedures have been protested and a
FERC order is expected soon.  Other utilities may be filing their procedures
shortly.  Once you have gotten the procedures and interconnection agreements,
I am happy to review them.

An ENA attorney must sign off on the interconnection agreement.  Generally, I
review the interconnection agreement from a regulatory perspective.  It is
important to have someone in Genco review it if Enron will own or operate it
after in-service or if EPMI plans to purchase power from the plant.  The
interconnection agreement usually contains operational provisions, including
imbalance provisions, that are typically very one sided toward the utility,
so it is important to have Enron technical input before the agreement is
executed.

Asking for interconnection and getting in a queue is not a request for
transmission.  You should consult the power trading desk transmission people
in order to determine whether a request for firm or non-firm transmission
needs to be made.  The desk can make the request if necessary.  While the
desk may choose to use daily/hourly non-firm transmission for some of the
Enron plants, the decision is made on a case-by-case basis.  You do not want
your plant to be "stranded" without the ability to wheel electricity away
from the busbar, unless you are building a plant in order to sell power
directly to the interconnected utility, and even then, you may want to wheel
power around at times.

If the utility does not have enough transmission capability to wheel power
from the plant, the plant/Enron may have to pay "network upgrades."  You want
to make sure that you are reserving transmission on a firm (priority) basis
if you pay for network upgrades.  Some utilities simply provide "transmission
credits" when requiring network upgrades.  These are not as valuable to Enron
because there may be no opportunity to ever wheel the power if Enron doesn't
have a "reservation" for the transmission.  The Eastern interconnection is
prone to curtailments of transmission called "TLRs," especially in the
summer.  The Power Trading desk can assist in obtaining the transmission.

In order to sell power to the grid, the plant must apply to FERC for "Exempt
Wholesale Generator" (EWG) status and also obtain a FERC Power Marketer
license with "Market Based Rates."  These filings make the on-site generator
a "utility" for FERC purposes and subjects the "power marketer" to periodic
filings at FERC.  These generally must be filed at least 60 days before the
plant will start producing any power.  The filings take several weeks to
prepare.

Do not assume that you can sell ancillary services from the plant.  The plant
may not be able to sell ancillary services into the market.  EPMI has the
FERC authorization to sell certain ancillary services in California and
NEPOOL, but EPMI cannot, at this time, sell in other areas (absent a FERC
filing and setting up an OASIS web page).  Be aware that many utilities add
language in their interconnection agreements that allow them to "take" the
ancillary services from your plant, without compensation.

If you are dealing with an industrial that has a plant on-site, additional
issues are involved.  You can check on the Enron home page under "Sites",
"Intranet", "Government Affairs", "State Restructuring Reports" for
information on the status of retail open access in that state.  If you need
additional assistance, contact Elizabeth Linnell 33896.

Generally, the state must have retail open access in order for Enron to sell
power to a plant.  In order for an on-site plant to sell power to the grid,
it must apply to FERC for "Exempt Wholesale Generator" (EWG) status and also
obtain a FERC Power Marketer license with "Market Based Rates."  These
filings make the on-site generator a "utility" for FERC purposes and subject
the "power marketer" to periodic filings at FERC.  Because some industrials
may not want to be FERC regulated, ENA may be able to use a "Special Purpose
Vehicle" (SPV) so that ENA may own part of the generator.  There are also
options to establish a "Qualified Facility" (QF) that sells power to the
interconnected utility.  The interconnected utility may also have a program
in which it purchases excess power from the on-site plant.  Please contact
Bob Frank 33180 for help on possible regulatory structures.

There may also be issues if the plant is connecting to a lower voltage line,
such as a 69kv or 138kv.  Some utilties have filed to put these lines into
their distribution systems, rather than in the wholesale transmission system,
which may take them out of FERC jurisdiction for wheeling purposes.  We have
not fully examined this type of situation, but can if necessary.

There are other regulatory issues, such as site permitting, political
assistance, environmental permits, that must also be addressed.  The regional
regulatory people in Rick Shapiro's government affairs group can assist you.


Please get copies to me asap of the Edison motion and the CPUC FERC
complaint.  Has someone, maybe someone at ENA, already looked at any
allegations about Enron or TW?  Please forward these to Kathy Ringblom also
and I'll have her itemize any allegations we might want to repond to.
Thanks  DF

ET & S Business Intelligence Department
From: Lorna Brennan on 09/05/2000 09:30 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: So Cal Edison Claims Withholding of Pipeline Capacity

Edison Charges Gas Market Manipulation

Southern California Edison filed a motion late last week with the California
Public Utility Commission seeking emergency relief from high spot gas prices
on which its power purchase rates are based. The company told the CPUC that
Southern California Border (Topock, AZ) prices in the last month have risen
by $2.50/MMBtu possibly because of market manipulation, in particular the
withholding off of the market of pipeline transportation capacity between the
supply basins and the California border.

"[T]here is substantial and compelling evidence that the basis differential
has been and continues to be grossly distorted by market power abuse,
collusion and affiliate self dealing of out-of-state gas suppliers and
merchants," Edison told the CPUC.

The company noted the CPUC already has filed a Section 5 complaint with FERC
regarding this issue and is seeking a recision of "certain allegedly
collusive contracts which it contends have permitted out-of-state natural gas
suppliers and their affiliates to drive up artificially California border gas
prices by wrongfully withholding capacity." It notes the complaint
"conservatively estimates that the anti-competitive manipulation of the basis
differential has already damaged California gas and electricity users by $100
million annually since the beginning of 1998."

Edison seeks an expedited order authorizing it to use the posted gas price of
$4.5133/MMBtu, which was applied to SCE's August 2000 avoided cost posting,
to calculate its payment obligations to qualified power producers for the
month of October and every month going forward. It estimated September
bidweek border prices would average $7/MMBtu. If such prices were used in
Edison's September avoided costs posting, its Transition Formula payments to
certain independent power producers will be $29 million more than the month
prior, the company told the CPUC. "No mechanism exists to recapture the
increase in such payments if it is later determined by this commission or in
another forum that the Topock border indices are unreliable at this time."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000
05:16 PM ---------------------------

"Dalecka, Patrycja ." <Patrycja.Dalecka@destia.com> on 03/10/2000 02:40:19 PM
To: "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Hello

Vince,
Dziekuje bardzo za artykul.
Troche sie go wystraszylam dzis rano, gdyz nie slyszalam, zeby Aiesec mial
jakis back up plan...
Przepraszam za moja gwaltowna reakcje.

Tymczasem zycie toczy sie dalej.
Zalaczam moje resume, postaram sie poprawic jego forme na poniedzialek...
niestety tresci juz nie poprawie, wiec mozesz poczytac... ha, ha
Rozumiem, ze czas najwyzszy poszukac "rozsadnej" posady...

pozdrawiam,

Patrycja

 - resume.doc


We will need to be packed and ready to move for WEDNESDAY, 02/06/02 & THURSDAY, 02/07/02.  The move team will be moving our group during the day and the stenos will NOT be working until Monday, 02/11/02.

Also, please make sure that we LOGOFF again tonight...the IT group could not migrate us over the weekend due to incomplete items with legal.  They are going to try and take care of the migration tonight for the new UBS systems.

Thanks for your help.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760