UN WIRE
An Independent News Briefing about the United Nations
-------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, 16 November, 2000 - http://www.unfoundation.org

Today's UN WIRE Stories

UN AFFAIRS
 1 SANCTIONS: Annan Advocates More Effective, Fair Measures

HEALTH
 2 HIV/AIDS: Gene Breakthrough Offers Hope For Cure
 3 HIV/AIDS II: South Africa Approves AZT In Combination Drug
 4 MALARIA: Outbreak In Burundi Kills Hundreds

WOMEN, CHILDREN AND POPULATION
 5 CHILDREN: 1990 UN Goals Remain Unfulfilled, Holkeri Says
 6 MATERNAL MORTALITY: Countries Deliberate To Lower Death Rates
 7 RUSSIA: UNFPA Supports Study Of Population Decline

ENVIRONMENT
 8 CLIMATE CHANGE: EU Unexpectedly Warms To US Proposal
 9 DAMS: Projects Often Ignore Human Costs, World Commission
Says
 10 CHINA: World Bank Begins $1.3 Billion Pollution Project

ECONOMICS, TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT
 11 WTO: Reversing Course, APEC Requests Talks In 2001
 12 WORLD BANK: Wolfensohn Defends Loans Geared To Leaders
 13 ESCAP: Commission To Focus On Regional Poverty,
Globalization
 14 COSTA RICA: UNDP Says Slow Legal Process Could Impact
Economy

HUMANITARIAN AID AND FOOD SECURITY
 15 NORTH KOREA: FAO Warns Of Seventh Year of Food Shortages
 16 EAST TIMOR: UN Meets Militia Leaders On Refugee Return
 17 UNRWA: Agency Seeks $39 Million In Emergency Funds

HUMAN RIGHTS, JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY
 18 MYANMAR: ILO Appears Set To Support Sanctions, Sources Say

CRIME, CORRUPTION AND DRUGS
 19 CRIME: UN Adopts Treaty To Combat Illegal Activities
 20 DRUGS: Asian Officials Discuss Control Programs

PEACEKEEPING AND SECURITY
 21 MIDDLE EAST: Israelis, Palestinians Reportedly Meet On UN
Force

GET THE FULL SCOOP

These stories and the complete issue of today's UN Wire
can be found on the Web at http://www.unfoundation.org.
The Web version includes hot-links to the complete text
of cited articles, a fully searchable archive and easy
access to recent issues.

ACCESS RECENT ISSUES at
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwire/archives/index.cfm

UN Wire is a free service sponsored by the United Nations
Foundation and its sister organization, the Better World
Fund, which are dedicated to supporting United Nations
efforts on behalf of the environment, population stabilization
and children's health.  UN Wire is produced independently by
National Journal Group (http://www.nationaljournal.com).  For
the latest information and updates on UN Foundation activities,
visit us on the web at http://www.unfoundation.org.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2000 National Journal.

Telephone: (703) 518-8759
Fax:       (703) 519-6377
Email:     unwire@unfoundation.org

Editor in Chief:  Steve Hirsch
--------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the UN Wire Notification Service, go to
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwirelogin/unf_listadmin.cfm

Questions, concerns and comments can be sent to
unwire@unfoundation.org.

UN news and other submissions should be directed to
unwire-submit@unfoundation.org.

You are currently subscribed to unfoundation-unwire as:
klay@enron.com

To subscribe, visit the UN Wire Web site at:
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwirelogin/unf_listadmin.cfm
and enter your email address. Registration is required.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to the address below:
leave-unfoundation-unwire-290701M@lists.unfoundation.org
--------------------------------------------------------------


With the recent shuffle of people moving to new desks, I'm sure there will be keyboard trays that need to be moved, as well as some repairs.  Wall 2 Wall will be in on Wednesday afternoon to look after this.

Please let me know by Wednesday morning if you need anything done.

Thanks,

Carla


Mary says the traders in Portland want to get involved and want to resurrect
discussions about a reverse auction mechanism for forward contracts to smooth
out the price spikes.  I think we ought to press on this issue and  see if
Kari can help us elevate the profile of this solution and start getting
specific.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/30/2000 11:19 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Options the Governor's Considering

FYI:  Set up a meeting with Kari Dohn for next Wednesday.

	Steven J Kean
	11/27/2000 09:22 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Options the Governor's Considering

Jeff Dasovich and I, along with several IEP members, met with Gov Davis'
staff today, including his Chief of Staff, his Staff Director and two policy
advisors on energy issues.  They made the following points:

The Governor is personally spending a great deal of time on electricity
issues (and is forcing them to spend their time on it as well).
The Governor recognizes that part of the problem is a supply shortage, but
they put special emphasis on the view that in addition to supply shortfalls,
a big part of the problem is a "dysfunctional market" -- a thinly veiled
reference to price manipulation by people sitting in the room.
The Governor's view is that all participants (regulators, utilities,
customers and generators) must "behave responsibly".
Everyone must "share the pain".
The legislative battles are likely to start as soon as the legislature
returns next week, and the Governor will be putting forth several legislative
proposals in the next couple of weeks.
While staff went out of its way to say that the list of proposals (in the
attached e-mail) were unofficial and for discussion purposes only, it was
fairly clear that they defined much of what the governor plans to propose.

The meeting was not very encouraging nor did it provide much in the way of
new information.  The IEP group was on message, making the usual arguments
about the need for forward contracting, expedited generation and transmission
siting, a real retail market to promote demand side responses, etc.  The
staff is clearly focussed on forward contracting as part of the solution but
remains committed to the idea that generators have to cough up some money and
remain subject to rate caps, possible restrictions on sales outside the state
(at least at peak times), etc.  One approach they appear to be toying with is
a "share the pain" proposal which would have utilities absorbing some of the
deferred costs and consumers absorbing some of the deferred costs in the form
of higher rates.  That leaves generators ... who they might want to either
agree to some refunds or provide power at lower going-forward prices.

The staff says that they remain open to proposed solutions, but the Davis
administration appears unwilling to spend any political capital to fix the
problem.

I think we are in for a lengthy legislative and PUC fight.  We should, as
always, provide consistent and reasonable solutions.  I think we should
prepare a document for distribution to staff, legislators (and anyone else)
that takes the factual background and proposed solutions we have put forward
(eg in Belden's presentation and the Seabron Adamson whitepaper) and wraps
them in a more political context.  In other words, we have already
articulated the right answers; we now need to put a political rationale
around our proposals -- a set of arguments which responds directly to the
political opposition those answers are likely to encounter.  Jeff will follow
up with one of the staff members in particular (Kari Dohn) and I would
suggest that Jeff and Sandi work together on putting the necessary political
rhetoric around the solutions we have proposed.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/22/2000 04:00 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Options the Governor's Considering

Steve:  FYI.  Don't worry about the conference call, but thought it might be
useful to review the proposals prior to Monday's meeting.

See you Monday.

Happy Thanksgiving to all.

Best,
Jeff

******************************************************************************
**************************************

Several IEP companies have been invited to a meeting with the Governor,s
staff next Monday, November 27th.
The following are some options, which the Governor,s office is considering.
IEP is doing some preliminary research on some of these topics.  IEP would
like to arrange a teleconference call around noon on Monday, November 27th to
discuss the Governor,s meeting.  Please advise us as to whether your have
been invited, and who you are sending.
California,s electricity supply situation has two inter-related problems )
(1) high wholesale electricity costs, and (2) marginally adequate supply of
generation ) both have combined to create a dysfunctional wholesale
electricity market.  The goals should be:
 To assure reliable electricity to California consumers for the lowest
reasonable cost.
o Consider requiring that all in-state generation be sold in state.
o Consider re-asserting state authority over the operation, maintenance and
safety practices of all in-state generating facilities, for public health and
safety purposes.
o Consider developing a state power authority to build generation and
own/operate transmission.
o Consider requiring utilities both to retain existing and to build new
generation.
o Consider providing utilities with authority to stabilize retail prices to
be paid by consumers through development of an energy portfolio that reduces
exposure to spot markets, including contracting forward for much more of
their unmet power needs.
o Consider extending consumer rate freeze.
o Consider centralizing power plant dispatch like the other ISOs in the rest
of the country.
o Consider eliminating the ISO and assigning its functions to either a state
or private entity that can acquire the transmission facilities, and control
the electricity transmission grid (MUNIs have proposed this).
o Consider sponsoring/supporting legislation to change the ISO and PX boards
to increase accountability.
o Expand energy conservation programs focused both on immediate peak demand
reduction and on longer term, broader-based programs.
o Aggressively work to site new generation and transmission facilities, to
streamline permitting, and to develop renewable resources.
o Call for/sponsor federal FERC reform legislation that would:
o Impose a regional price cap that varies by time of day and year;
o Set requirements for FERC to use its retroactive refund authority;
o Improve FERC enforcement over price gouging practices;
o Affirm the role of states to protect their customers from unjust prices.
o Pressure the FERC to do its job to (1) bring about responsible seller
behavior in wholesale electric markets through price controls and other
market interventions as necessary, and (2) provide refunds to affected
consumers.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000 03:44 PM -----

	Susan J Mara
	11/22/2000 03:05 PM

		 To: "CHUDSON" <carol@iepa.com>
		 cc: "Andy Brown \(E-mail\)" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, chudson@iepa.com, "Curtis
Kebler \(E-mail\)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Delaney Hunter
\(E-mail\)" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Greg Blue \(E-mail\)"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack Pigott \(E-mail\)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jeff
Dasovich \(E-mail\)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)"
<joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout \(E-mail\)" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>,
jparker@HMOT.com, "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
kelly@hnks.com, "Kelly Norton \(E-mail\)" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "Lynn
Lednicky \(E-mail\)" <lale@dynegy.com>, marie_moretti@msn.com,
mrmonagan@aol.com, "Bob Weisenmiller \(E-mail\)" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Bob
Escalante \(E-mail\)" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Rob Lamkin \(E-mail\)"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)"
<Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "McNally Temple Assn. Inc. \(Business
Fax\)"@mail.cwo.com
		 Subject: Re:

Jeff Dasovich and Steve Kean are attending.  Someone can be on a call -- me
if no one else -- if Jeff and Steve are travelling at the time. Hey, does the
Governor have to fly coach?

	"CHUDSON" <carol@iepa.com>
	11/22/2000 12:47 PM

		 To: "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Jeff Dasovich \(E-mail\)"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Kelly Norton \(E-mail\)" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>,
"John Stout \(E-mail\)" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Curtis Kebler
\(E-mail\)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Rob Lamkin \(E-mail\)"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Bob Weisenmiller \(E-mail\)"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Andy
Brown \(E-mail\)" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Bob Escalante \(E-mail\)"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Greg Blue \(E-mail\)" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack
Pigott \(E-mail\)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)" <joer@calpine.com>, "Lynn Lednicky
\(E-mail\)" <lale@dynegy.com>, "McNally Temple Assn. Inc. \(Business
Fax\)"@mail.cwo.com, "Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Susan J
Mara \(E-mail\)" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, <mrmonagan@aol.com>,
<marie_moretti@msn.com>, "Delaney Hunter \(E-mail\)"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, <kelly@hnks.com>, <jparker@HMOT.com>,
<chudson@iepa.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Jan Smutny-Jones, Exec Dir
Independent Energy Producers Assn.
1112 I Street, Suite 380
Sacramento, CA 95814
PH: 916-448-9499
FX: 916-448-0182
iepa@iepa.com

 - Govs meeting Conf Call.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
11:40 AM ---------------------------

Darlene C Forsyth
12/12/2000 10:07 AM
To: Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Could it be we're not paying attention?

The man whispered, "God speak to me" and a meadowlark sang. But the man
did not hear.

So the man yelled "God speak to me" And the thunder rolled across the sky.
But the man did not listen.

The man looked around and said, "God let me see you." And a star shined
brightly, but the man did not notice.

And the man shouted, "God show me a miracle" And a life was born.  But
the man did not know.

So the man cried out in despair, "Touch me God, and let me know you are
here" Whereupon, God reached down and touched the man. But the man brushed
the butterfly away and walked on.

Don't miss out on a blessing because it isn't packaged the way that you
expect.  So many times we see miracles and do not recognize them for what
they are.

My instructions were to send this to four or more people that I wanted God
to bless and I picked you. Please pass this to people you want to be
blessed.


I've dragged you to two country concerts, so you can pick this one.  Either
is fine with me.  I promise.  Mom and I did have a good weekend.  We were
laughing last night b/c we really didn't do anything.  We just sat around and
talked and watched movies all weekend.  She said to tell you she's sorry she
ruined your weekend.  I told her you didn't mind that she was here.

What'd you end up doing last night?

Talk to ya later,
Robin


Hi Ginger, I need a copy of my last 2 pay stubs in order to get my work visa stuff started. If you could please send me a copy. Thank you very much.

		Robert Benson


On May 8, 2001, in greater San Juan, Puerto Rico, a San Juan Metro bus
dropped into a hole that had been excavated by a work crew from San Juan Gas
Company. The hole had been excavated by a San Juan Gas crew (or contract
labor) under the supervision of a San Juan Gas operations supervisor as part
of the project in which new plastic gas pipe and fiber optic conduit were
being inserted into a portion of the existing San Juan Gas distribution
system.

At the request of Risk Management, the Litigation Unit engaged local counsel
and a local investigator for the purpose of obtaining the details of the
incident. Initial reports indicate that at approximately 5:00 pm on May 8,
the rear wheels of a Metro bus dropped into the excavation described above.
The bus was traveling in a contra-flow bus lane and apparently struck and
damaged three private vehicles as a result of the incident.

The incident also caused personal injury to the bus driver, some passengers
and others. The bus driver and two passengers were taken to the hospital, but
do not appear to be seriously injured. The driver complained of being
overcome by the fumes of the diesel fuel that was spilled from the fuel tank
of the bus. An elderly male passenger was thrown form his seat and may have
injured his ribs. A 9 year old girl received a contusion to her forehead.
Additionally, approximately 20 other individuals claimed to have been
passengers on the bus and complained to the police of injuries. None required
immediate hospital treatment.

The facts obtained to date, indicate that the hole was excavated by the San
Juan Gas crew (as part of the insertion program mentioned above) in the bus
lane as allowed by permit on April 30, 2001. The hole was not filled on that
date, but was left with a large, heavy steel plate over it so that further
work could be done. Between April 30 and May 8, the hole remained unfilled
with the steel plate covering it and some further work may have been
undertaken. The hole was filled in shortly after the incident.

In light of the facts that have been obtained, it is the view of Risk
Management that the incident is a covered event and is, therefore, an insured
matter. They wish to proceed immediately to address the personal injury and
property claims in an effort to obtain an efficient resolution of such claims
before suits are brought and the cost of litigation is incurred. Based on the
facts of this incident and our litigation experience in San Juan, the
Litigation Unit concurs with the desire of Risk Management to seek an
expedited resolution of the claims that will arise out of this incident.

Risk Management has made arrangements with a local claims adjuster, in
conjunction with our local counsel, to undertake the task of resolving the
claims. Since the goal is to resolve the claims before litigation, Risk
Management is prepared to initiate the process on Monday, May 21, and will do
so, unless an objection is received. If you have an objection or wish to have
further information, simply respond to this email.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.


Tana,

We are needing a quick Legal blessing for Media General today.  Tom should be
emailing us
today but I wanted you to know before this.

Media General, Inc.
333 East Grace Street
Richmond, VA
CPID  79935

Let me know if you need more details.

Thanks!
Camille


Thank you for taking time-out to call George Roberts at KKR prior to the O-I
Board meeting yesterday.  As you can gather, we are stalled with O-I, in part
because the executive management seems preoccupied with other issues to the
point where it is reticent to engage with the O-I decision makers appointed
to negotiate with Enron.

Hopefully, with some interest at the Board level, O-I executive management
would be motivated to direct its negotiators to engage and finalized the
deal.

Please advise me if there is any follow up to be completed through you or
directly with Mr. Roberts.


Please take a look at the attached draft explanation of recent events in the
California gas market.  When completed, this narrative is intended to be used
for two purposes:
1. The factual basis of an Enron/Ken Lay letter to regulators/legislators on
recent events in the California gas market; and
2.  a briefing paper to be used by our DC office in dealing with
legislators.  Specifically, Joe Hillings has been asked to provide a briefing
to Congressman Bill Thomas (R-CA) prior to the congressman's upcoming meeting
with FERC.


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000 09:33 AM -----

	"Curry, Alicia" <acurry@velaw.com>
	07/07/2000 09:27 AM

		 To: "St. Clair, Carol (Enron)" <carol.st.clair@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Raptor II

Terrie Harshfield will be sending them out.  I will pass along your request.
I hope all is well with you and the baby to be!

Alicia L. Curry
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
2300 First City Tower
1001 Fannin Street
Houston, Texas 77002-6760
Phone:  713-758-4428
Fax:  713-615-5688
E-mail:  acurry@velaw.com
(Licensed in New York only)


Not a problem.  I'll let you know how it goes.  df

Steven Harris
01/22/2001 04:36 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: ECS Gallup contract

Drew, if you don't mind I think you may be able to argue this better based on
your knowledge of the history and facts. Let me know if you feel otherwise.
Thanks.

 Steve

Drew Fossum
01/22/2001 12:52 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: ECS Gallup contract

Once Susan gets the last few pieces of info, either Steve or I should call
ECS and try to resolve this.  Steve--you or me??  Its your call.  DF

Susan Scott
01/21/2001 12:45 PM
To: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ECS Gallup contract

Here are some bullet points based on our conversation Friday morning
regarding the ECS Compression Service Agreement.  These bullet points
summarize our position and are intended to be a starting point for a
conversation between persons at TW and at ECS (who are yet to be determined)
regarding the additional power costs incurred by Transwestern as a result of
the lack of a system for monitoring peak loads on CDEC.  If you have
additional comments, please let me know.

We still need to decide who is going to call whom; I am going to leave that
up to you, but do let me know if I can help.

-  ECS is under an obligation to work in good faith with CDEC to establish a
monitoring system that would automatically
alert TW to peak loading conditions on CDEC's system.

-  Rate No. 21 became effective in July 2000.  ECS did not obtain permission
for TW to access the "Members Only" portion of CDEC's website (which contains
load data) until January 2001.  Access to the information required a
confidentiality agreement, which was executed in December.

-  ECS blames the delay on Tri-State/CDEC, who allegedly would not work on
the confidentiality agreement until the merger was completed.   "Good faith"
by ECS would reasonably include alerting TW to any such delay or any
difficulty in getting access to CDEC's information.  TW was never contacted
in this regard.

-  Since Rate No. 21 contains a rebate for customers that avoid peak load
times, we assume that CDEC is under an obligation to provide such customers
with access to peak load information (I have not been able to verify this,
but it makes sense).  If this is true, we should have been able to have
access immediately upon the effectiveness of Rate No. 21.

-  Most if not all of the $325,000 peak load costs incurred by TW since July
could have been avoided had TW had access to a monitoring system.  Because it
did not alert TW to difficulties/delay in getting the necessary information
from CDEC, ECS did not act in good faith in obtaining such access and should
therefore take responsibility for its share of the consequences.

-  ECS needs to act without further delay to build an automated monitoring
system to eliminate the need for someone to continuously monitor the
website.  An estimated completion date should be provided.

I've left messages at CDEC to ask about access to the Members Only part of
the website; I'll follow up.  The website states only that access is granted
"on a case-by-case basis."  I hope to make contact on Monday and will let you
know what I'm able to learn from them.


Hector  -- we need to try to contact this person and bring her back  ---- there is no one here who knows how to do these things

Many of them will be in the ongoing company.

Who's approval do I need to get this done?
[Apollo, Beth]
Beth

here is a list of things Pam would be able to do if we could bring her back.  A number (Almost all) of these items are not being done.

PAM'S RESPONSIBILITIES

1.	Generated third party monthly accruals for accounting
2.	Trued up prior period accruals against actual invoices
3.	Monthly/Quarterly/Annually Department of Energy Reporting (DOE)
4.	Quarterly/Annually  Federal Energy Regulation Commission Reporting (FERC)
5.	Monthly Green Power reporting for California Energy commission (Enron Wind)
6.	Manual Downloads of customer usage/metered via CSC via utilities.
7.	Monthly California Settlement
8.	Monthly Ohio Settlement- First Energy
9.	Monthly EMPI settlement (Or New Wholesale Trading Partner)
10.	Prepare Consumption band calculations to be put on customer  invoices
11.	Prepare third party billing
12.	Spreadsheets
a.	Comparing metered vs. scheduled
b.	Original scheduled vs. final scheduled
c.	EPMI purchases/sales vs. EES scheduled.
d.	Comparing ancillary service charges to traders original deal

Please let me know what we can workout.

Thanks - MO


FYI.  Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 04:04 PM -----

	Pamela J Allison
	06/28/2000 03:43 PM

		 To: Gerry Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ray Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Dave Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Drew C Lynch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elyse
Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina
Taylor/HOU/EES@EES, Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janie
Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Rachael Tobor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Miguel
Padron/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ranendra
Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terrie James/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Philip
Bazelides/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mary Ellen Coombe/Houston/Eott@Eott, Arleen
Barnett/Enron@Gateway, Suzanne Gruber/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nigel
Sellens/LON/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Rizzi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy L Drew/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Candace Womack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nedre Strambler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Vargo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Tumey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debi Vanwey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Richard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Vasut/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Margo Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Broadfoot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheryl
Beckman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura E Lara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Gambill/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Ann Kamin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tasha Lair/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward
Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Cronin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Becky
Quintana/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joyce Barrett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ryan
Seleznov/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amanda
Curless/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Cruz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
McKay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Gonzalez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy
Spickard/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lara Marie Berry/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gretchen
Jennings/OTS/Enron@Enron, Sallye Wolf/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Daniel Batista/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rafael
Pina/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl
Arguijo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Johnny
Palmer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick Suttle/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Caroline Schaeffer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pam Wilson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Richard Kim/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Kevin Ormston/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Paige Butler/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Amy Palmisano/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Dianne White/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Felicia Solis/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Larry Burton/HOU/EES@EES, Karl Skadowski/HOU/EES@EES, Liz
Panfely/HOU/EES@EES, Bonnie Holcomb/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Germann/HOU/EES@EES,
James Hull/HOU/EES@EES, Gail Francis/HOU/EES@EES, Sunjay Arya/HOU/EES@EES,
Pam Wilson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Amy
Gambill/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ann Kamin/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Edward Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Rights Agreement

Please make copies of the attached and substitute it for the old Form B in
new hire packets.  I am also working with Forms Management to put it in their
book so you can order a supply.

If you have questions about the form, please call Kriste Sullivan at the
number below.

-------------------- Forwarded by Ryan Seleznov/Corp/Enron on 06/26/2000
03:08 PM ---------------------------

06/01/2000 10:52 AM
Kriste Sullivan
Kriste Sullivan
Kriste Sullivan
06/01/2000 10:52 AM
06/01/2000 10:52 AM
Sent by: Tanja Murray
To: Ryan Seleznov/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Rights Agreement

Below please find the distribution list for the Confidentiality and
Intellectual Property Rights Agreement.  Also find the revised
Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Rights Agreement.  If you have any
questions, I can be reached at the number below.

Kriste K. Sullivan
Enron Corp. Legal
EB 4861
Ext. 37557


We have received the following executed EEI agreements

Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc. - 12/4/2000
Lassen Municipal Utility District - 10/30/2000
Clatskanie People's Utility District - 10/25/2000

Copies will be given to legal and credit.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Terry K. - Oncall

Date:		3/3/2001
Time:		7:00 AM - 8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


One question:  I had Melissa Murphy put together the termination dates for each of the counterparties and was wondering if you could clarify something for me.  If a termination date is 12/4/2001, do I move 12/4 forward to the bankrupt book or do I move 12/5 forward to the bankrupt book?

Thanks,
Stacey

-----Original Message-----
From: Sager, Elizabeth
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:39 PM
To: White, Stacey W.
Subject: RE: Non-terminated Power Transactions

Thanks Stacey for all the hard work in putting this together- this list is great.  I  met with the East group today and the West group on Tuesday to review.  We may have questions but  .... thanks again.

-----Original Message-----
From: White, Stacey W.
Sent: Sun 12/9/2001 4:30 PM
To: Sager, Elizabeth; St. Clair, Carol; Bradford, William S.; Fallon, Jim
Cc: Postlethwaite, John; Evans, Casey
Subject: Non-terminated Power Transactions

The following spreadsheet is a consolidation of counterparties that have not turned in termination letters.  I have also attached the list of terminations so that you can see the list we used.  If there are other counterparties that you know of that have not appeared on these lists, let me know and we will move them to the 'Bankruptcy Portfolio' we have set up.

<<Non-Terminated Counterparties as of 12-7-2001.xls>> <<Financial Power Terminated.xls>> <<Physical Power Terminated.xls>>

Please let me know what other details you need and we will be happy to provide.

Thanks,
Stacey White
Director Power Risk Management
713-853-1870


Here is the combine cycle Florida model.
Ben


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kenneth G Gruhl" <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kenneth+20G+20Gruhl+22+20+3Ckggruhl+40duke-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 12:36 PM
To:	Mulligan, Amy; Allen K Nielsen; blreese@duke-energy.com; Beck Mayberry; wralkema@pplmt.com; Christopher S Smart; dacluff@duke-energy.com; dlsmith@pplweb.com; dtedesco@duke-energy.com; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Darren Stephens; David Bowers; David P Pell; George X Ouzounian; jjbischoff@pplweb.com; jmtaggart@duke-energy.com; jpritchard@citlink.net; James Stebbins; kglenny@duke-energy.com; Kim White; mschneider@duke-energy.com; mschneider@duke-energy.com; MaryAnne Schneider; Michael Kerr; Michael Wells; rjnewson@duke-energy.com; rspear@pplmt.com; Sherry Davis; Steven Fliflet; Steven Fliflet; tedmayes@aol.com; Ted Romo; Todd Hendricks; Tom Carlson; Tyler J Kristensen; ajreiter@duke-energy.com; kggruhl@duke-energy.com
Subject:	Griffith Gas & Electric Schedule Estimate - Mon. 7/30 HE 8:00 AM to Thur. 8/2 HE 7:00 AM

Griffith Gas & Electric Schedules for the next 3 days:

1) Monday 7/30 HE 8:00 AM to Tuesday 7/31 HE 7:00 AM
2) Tuesday 7/31 HE 8:00 AM to Wednesday 8/1 HE 7:00 AM
3) Wednesday 8/1 HE 8:00 AM to Thursday 8/2 HE 7:00 AM

(Embedded image moved to file: pic32591.pcx)
(Embedded image moved to file: pic18762.pcx)

(Embedded image moved to file: pic01655.pcx)
 - pic32591.pcx
 - pic18762.pcx
 - pic01655.pcx


Palo Alto would like a MSA draft by Thursday.  Is this too ambitious for
us?   Let me know -

Thanks,

Kim


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000
01:32 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           05/30/2000 09:18 AM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transport p&l

Phillip--
I've noticed one thing on your intra-month transport p&l that looks strange
to me.  Remember that I do not know the Northwest at all, so this may not be
an issue, but I'll point it out and let you decide.  Let me know if this is
O.K. as is, so I'll know to ignore it in the future.  Also, if you want me to
get with Kim and the Sitara people to change the mapping, let me know and
I'll take care of it..

On PG&E NW, it appears that PGEN Kingsgate is mapped to a Malin Citygate
curve instead of a Kingsgate curve, resulting in a total transport loss of
$235,019.
(If the mapping were changed, it should just reallocate p&l--not change your
overall p&l.)  Maybe there is a reason for this mapping or maybe it affects
something else somewhere that I am not seeing, but anyway, here are the Deal
#'s, paths and p&l impacts of each.
  139195  From Kingsgate to Malin     ($182,030)
  139196 From Kingsgate to PGEN/Tuscarora   ($    4,024)
  139197  From Kingsgate to PGEN Malin    ($    8,271)
  231321  From Kingsgate to Malin     ($  38,705)
  153771 From Kingsgate to Stanfield    ($     1,988)
 Suggested fix:  Change PGEN Kingsgate mapping from GDP-Malin Citygate to
GDP-Kingsgate.

 Clay Basin storage--this is really a FYI more than anything else--I see five
different tickets in Sitara for Clay Basin activity--one appears to be for
withdrawals and the other four are injections.  Clay Basin is valued as a
Questar curve, which is substantially below NWPL points.  What this means is
that any time you are injecting gas, these tickets will show transport
losses; each time you are withdrawing, you will show big gains on transport.
I'm not sure of the best way to handle this since we don't really have a
systematic Sitara way of handling storage deals.  In an ideal world, it seems
that you would map it the way you have it today, but during injection times,
the transport cost would pass through as storage costs.  Anyway, here's the
detail on the tickets just for your info, plus I noticed three days where it
appears we were both withdrawing and injecting from Clay Basin.  There may be
an operational reason why this occurred that I'm not aware of, and the dollar
impact is very small, but I thought I'd bring it to your attention just in
case there's something you want to do about it.  The columns below show the
volumes under each ticket and the p&L associated with each.

Deal #  251327                  159540                   265229
106300   201756
P&L  $29,503                ($15,960)                ($3,199)
($2,769)   ($273)
Rec:   Ques/Clay Basin/0184   NWPL/Opal 543  NWPL/Opal   Sumas      NWPL/S of
Gr Rvr
Del:   NWPL/S of Green River/Clay   Ques/Clay Basin/0852   Ques/Clay
Basin/0852   Ques/Clay Basin    Ques/Clay Basin
1        329       8,738
2     1,500
3         2,974    11,362
4         6,741    12,349       1,439
5       19,052          3,183
9            333
13  30,863       2,680
14  30,451
15  35,226
16         6,979              235
17  17,464
18    9,294
20  10,796          771
21  17,930
22  10,667
23       14,415          9,076
25  23,934       8,695
26     3,284
27         1,976
28     1,751
29     1,591
30  20,242


Folks, I need your help:

Fast approaching is Sue Mara's next birthday.  She has made it
verrrrrrrrrrrry clear to me (ahem) that she does not want a lot of attention
or fuss; however, I do think it would be nice if she received a card with
lots of signatures and well wishes!

Therefore, this is what I propose:  In order to be as discreet and "secret"
as possible, *please* send your birthday wishes to her to my attention via
this e-mail address and I will then print out each person's missive and
enclose it with a card.

If you are interested in submitting something to me on Sue's behalf, PLEASE
get it to me by THURSDAY, April 15th!!! [just think tax time, LOL!]

Again, please submit via this e-mail only to:  joseph.alamo@enron.com

THANKS SO MUCH in advance for your participation!

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Admin. Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
04:29 PM ---------------------------

Peter Augustini <paugustini@CERA.com> on 01/28/2000 02:51:24 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Special Offer - Power Transmission Workshop

Mr. Vincent J. Kaminski
Vice President, Research
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

Dear Mr. Kaminski:

We want to make a special offer to you regarding the mid-project workshop
for CERA's new study "High Tension: The Future of Power Transmission in
North America".  This session will be held on Friday, February 11, 2000 from
8:30AM - 1:30PM in the Monarch Room at the Westin Galleria Hotel, in
Houston, Texas.

In consideration of your participation in CERAWEEK 2000, we invite you to
enroll in the workshop for a special, stand-alone fee of $5,000.
Participation in the workshop (normally available only to those enrolled in
the study) will provide you with the workshop briefing book, a recap of work
to date, a review of the initial scenarios and an interactive discussion on
sign posts, strategic implications and business segment analysis.

To view the online prospectus for the study, and to get the workshop
enrollment form, please go to:
http://eprofile.cera.com/cfm/track/mc.cfm?p=522&c=2804

This timely and important study analyzes the key issues and uncertainties
facing the electric transmission business, including industry structure,
strategy, policy and regulation, technology, market structure, reliability,
and operations.  The main project objective is to develop a scenario-based
framework for understanding the risks and business opportunities.

We hope you can join us for this timely event, and to take advantage of this
special offer.  To enroll in the workshop, please complete and return the
form found on the web page above.  For more information, please contact me
by phone at (617) 441-2610, or by email to paugustini@cera.com .

Sincerely,

Peter Augustini
Director, North American Energy

*****************************************************************
Our relationship with you is very important to us.  If you wish not to
receive e-mail notifications from CERA, please send a reply to this message
with "DoNotEmail" as the subject of your message. (
mailto:webmaster@cera.com?subject=DoNotEmail )
*****************************************************************

 - att1.htm


This request has been pending your approval for  60 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000057285&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000057285
Request Create Date : 8/30/01 5:59:30 PM
Requested For       : erik.simpson@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Basic Energy
Resource Type       : Applications


Amelia,  Can you check on contract # 96021047 to see if this is any current
transport activity on this contract.  This contract was never executed.
Reliant HL&P informed me that this contract is no longer being used and they
would prefer to terminate or void this contract.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 10:21 AM -----

	Sherri Sera
	11/29/2000 10:00 AM

		 To: lyncher40@hotmail.com, malong0509@aol.com, mswyatt@att.net,
sasutter@mediaone.net, jrt29@msn.com, pattyr@bevcomm.net,
linda@excelonline.com, jeffr@smig.net, clukes@smig.net,
webswing@deskmedia.com, nettijon@flash.net, Catherine DuMont/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, gailg@morgangroup.com,
dmusslewhite@sterlingmccalltoyota.com, annb@redstonegrp.com, Susan
Kalich/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, fherrera@hpcorp.com, halls2@access1.net,
dcole@focal.com, Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, jlcole@tuboscope.com,
kbrown@cei-crescent.com, markjr69@hotmail.com, tkaufman@msu.com,
casarafa@caboland.com, barbaracallender@pennzoil.com, cnoack@linbeck.com,
greg_baumbach@enron.net, Eddie Sera/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, janelle@travelpark.com, Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ken
Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Leslie
Speck/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, reinartz@wolf.co.net, lisa_conwell@mckinsey.com,
sharon@travelpark.com, Stephanie L Harris/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tina
Spiller/Corp/Enron@Enron, John J Esslinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, kjenne@coair.com,
dmbancroft@shellus.com, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
areinart@swbell.net, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Funny

This one will make you laugh!  SRS
 - Electile Dysfunction.jpg


Claudette, Dana & Carolyn,

    Sending this e-mail to remind you of the revival at Shaw Tabernacle UMC
on Friday at 7:30 pm.  The directions are 45S or 59S to 610E.  601E to
Wayside.  Exit Wayside and turn left under 610.   Take Wayside to Birmingham
and turn right on Birmingham.  Birmingham dead ends into the church.  Try
and be there on time, because the church fills up pretty quickly.

    Also remember the Seeds of Praise workshop on Saturday from 9:00 am to
2:00 pm at Mt. Corinth UMC in Humble. Take 1960 towards Humble.  Take the
"Y" in the road when going into Humble onto Old Humble Road.  The church is
about 1 to 1 1/2 miles down on the right.  If you pass Super K-Mart on the
left, turn around you have gone to far.  Breakfast will be served promptly
at 9:00 am.  I have already paid for all members going from Veterans, so we
can settle up later.

    Don't forget the picnic is on Sunday after service.  If you haven't
signed up to bring anything contact Danise Johnson to see what is still
needed.

    If you need any other info, please contact me:  (281)872-1197 Home

(713)696-6878 Work

(832)567-8674 Cell

(713)605-2405 Pager

Be Blessed,
Denise


fuck fri.  go out sat.


Hi Shelley,

Thanks so much for the pictures.  You sent the films along, though.  I will
return them to you.   (One packets of pictures is missing, which means one of
your films must still be at Walgreens.  Have Kim check that out.)

I will send the information that came here for you from Associated Realty
about giving proxy to a home owner here for a meeting in early February.  I
will try to attend the meeting when we return. (I believe it's Feb. 7th.  We
hope to be back by the 5th.)

We'll call you tonight.

Love,
Mom


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"publications@enerdata.com" <publications@enerdata.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22publications+40enerdata+2Ecom+22+20+3Cpublications+40enerdata+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:02 PM
To:	bobgruber@avistacorp.com; tmcelhinney@maxxpet.com; TMcElinney@vermilionresources.com; marlene_johnson@murphyoilcorp.com; khastin@ect.enron.com; kim@apbenergy.com
Subject:	October 2001 CGPR

NGX Index Analysis will follow shortly.

 - cgprOct01.pdf


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000 12:16 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Leigh Miller" <LMiller@eei.org>                           11/08/2000
08:55 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: Overview of NERC's Reliability Assessment 2000-2009

An overview of NERC's Reliability Assessment 2000-2009
      ,Copyright 2000 EEI. All rights reserved.

EEI's State Restructuring Service is proud to present an Internet E-Forum
providing an overview of the North American Electric Reliability Council's
(NERC) recently released Reliability Assessment 2000-2009, the reliability of
bulk electric systems in North America.

The reliability of the electric generation and transmission systems serving
North America has come under increased federal government, state regulator,
and customer scrutiny. Generation capacity margins have decreased and the
bulk electric systems are subjected to flows in magnitudes and directions not
contemplated when they were designed or for which there is minimal operating
experience.

Each year, the Reliability Assessment Subcommittee (RAS) of the North
American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) reviews the overall reliability
of existing and planned electric generation and transmission systems in North
America. This year's Reliability Assessment 2000-2009 report presents:

*An assessment of electric generation and transmission reliability through
2009

*An assessment of the generation resource adequacy of each Interconnection in
North America

*A discussion of key issues affecting reliability of future electric supply

*Regional assessments of electric supply reliability, including issues of
specific Regional concern

Presenting an overview of this year's Reliability Assessment is Frank J.
Koza, Jr., Chairman, Reliability Assessment Subcommittee, and General
Manager, Ventures, PECO Energy Company.

Our guest moderator is Tim Gallagher, Mgr Technical Services, NERC

To provide questions and commentary we have Jolly Hayden, Vice President of
Transmission, Dynegy

A copy of the Reliability Assessment 2000-2009 is available from the NERC web
site at http://www.nerc.com/~pc/syscond.html.

November 21, 2000 1 p.m. ET
Note: Please block a 2-hour time slot for the E-Forum. We expect the program
to take about one hour. Q&A at the conclusion of the E-Forum could take up to
an additional hour.

Registration Cut-off and Cancellation Policy: All registrations must be
received by November 17, 2000. Substitutions may be made at any time,
however, no refunds will be made for cancellations received after November
17, 2000.

Registration Cost:
EEI/NARUC/NCSL Members: $50.00 / Associates $75 / Non-members: $100.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
FOR MORE INFORMATION AND/OR TO REGISTER, ACCESS THE FOLLOWING URL:
www.eei.org/resources/meetings/forums/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
E-Forums are real-time, interactive presentations, created, produced and
distributed by EEI. The visual presentation is delivered over the Internet,
while the audio portion is delivered through a conference phone call. You can
participate in an E-Forum using any computer with Internet access and a
telephone.

To fully participate in the E-Forum, you will need:

- Access to the Internet and a web browser.
- A separate voice phone line and a phone to dial into the audio conference
call. Cell phones can be used.
- Upon confirmation of your registration, you will be given complete
instructions including the URL (with Password/ID) and a the conference phone
number.
- Slides used in the presentation will also be e-mailed to you prior to the
forum and will soon be available over the Internet.

For more information on EEI's E-Forums, contact Mike Oldak, Director, State
Competitive and Regulatory Policy at 202-508-5523 moldak@eei.org or Leigh
Miller, Coordinator at (202) 508-5522 lmiller@eei.org

For more information on EEI's State Restructuring Service, contact Norm
Jenks, Manager, Regulation and Competitive Analysis 202-508-5533
njenks@eei.org

,Copyright 2000 by the Edison Electric Institute
All rights reserved under U.S. and foreign law, treaties and conventions. No
part of this work may be distributed, redistributed, reproduced or copied in
any form or by any means - graphic, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems
without written permission of the publisher.


Reminder:
Tomorrow is Brenda's Management Team Offsite Meeting. Thank you for all your
confirmations.  We would like to take a different approach to this meeting
soooooo instead of an agenda I am asking that each of you submit a topic that
you would like have discussed in a RoundTable format at tomorrow's meeting.
Topics can range from issues the Management Team does well that we can apply
to other areas, issues where we can improve and do better than we are, places
where we should challenge the status quo.  I realize that this request is a
little gray and a little broad so if you have any questions please call
otherwise please have your topics submitted by the end of today (don't you
just love short notice requests).

All of your input is what will make this meeting successful so thank you in
advance.

Yvette
x3.5953


There have been some issues that I have noticed in the last week or so that I
would like to address:

There have been several instances during the day, where we have noticed tasks
that have not been completed during the night shift.  Pursuant to that, I
would like to follow-up the January 18 meeting by outlining the duties that
are expected to be completed by the end of each night shift.

The night duty task priorities are as follows:

1.  Identify Hourly Position

2.  Manage Positions

3.  Trade the remainder of On-peak & Off-peak.

*4.  Verbal Hourly P & L checkout

*5.  Next-day pre-schedule checkout

6.  Track each hour Index prices (PJM, NY-ISO & NEPOOL)

7.  Book Transfers to respective Hourly books from ST & LT books for position
liquidations (Effectively making all the Hourly books flat)  * Instructions
will be provided

8.  Develop and distribute the Shift Note

*9.  P&L to Enpower Reconciliation for each book (Hourly: Mid-west,
Southeast, Northeast and ERCOT. Books should be flat by the a.m.)

* The highlighted items are the duties that need constant attention and are
of the utmost importance.

If there are any problems or questions regarding positions, deals done during
the day or schedule check-out difficulties, that cannot be resolved by
investigation, please call or page either Juan, Jester, Richard or myself.

I know that we are still training some new guys, however, there are things
that must be done at night.  If there us something that you do not know how
to do, ask until you find an acceptable answer.

If there are any questions, give me a shout on my cell phone.

Thanks,

Don

Cell #  (281) 787-0029
Home #  (281) 431-2987


Dear Judge Biren:

Attached is an electronic version of Transwestern Pipeline Company's Opening
Brief, which will be filed with the Commission today.

Susan Scott
Transwestern Pipeline Company
(713) 853-0596
susan.scott@enron.com


Kevin,

Yes, I am available. Please send a resume to Shirley Crenshaw.
Shirley will call you to set up the time.

Vince

	From:  Kevin McGowan @ ENRON                           07/10/2000 09:28 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:
Subject: Interview Request

I am trying to schedule an interview with a gentleman who is currently a
professor at Rice.  We are interested in possibly hiring him in a research
capacity in the Coal and Emissions group.  Would you have time to interview
him tom'w?  Let me know if you can.

Thank you

Kevin McGowan x-3-7499


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Bob M
Sent:	Monday, October  29, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	FW: Request for Migration of Sitara EOLBridge into Production

looks like a fix has been put in place.

thanks

bob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lamadrid, Victor
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:49 AM
To:	Allwein, Robert; Arteaga, Airam; Boudreaux, Shanna; Carter, Tamara; Collins, Joann; Erwin, Stephanie ; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillespie, Steve; Halstead, Lia; Homco, Meredith; Loocke, Kelly; Loving, Scott; Ordway, Chris; Pritchard, Michael; Prudenti, Dan; Ramirez, Robert; Sanchez, Christina; Wood, Tracy
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Hall, Bob M; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Smith, George F.; Pinion, Richard; Jaquet, Tammy; Farmer, Daren J.; Greif, Donna; Ames, Chuck; Brawner, Sandra F.; Germany, Chris; Goodell, Scott; Hodge, John; Keavey, Peter F.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Neal, Scott; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; Ring, Andrea; Savvas, Leonidas; Smith, Maureen; Taylor, Craig; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Vickers, Frank
Subject:	FW: Request for Migration of Sitara EOLBridge into Production

All,  A fix to prevent the occurrence of deals not bridging to Sitara from EOL when deal start and end dates were not entered on EOL has been installed and tested.THANKS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:22 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara; Truong, Dat; Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Subject:	Request for Migration of Sitara EOLBridge into Production

Hello Zhiyong,
	I have implemented an enhancement to avoid the problem of restarting the Sitara EOLBridge when there are missing startdate and enddate.  This fix will take care of this morning's problem.

EOL will be sent a Failed status similar to the following:
	message={EolTransactionId=2101638 TransactionSysDealId="" BridgeEntityName="EOLBridge" Message="Missing StartDate or EndDate" Status="F" BridgeDate="20011025170945CDT"}

I throughly tested the change by sending over 400 sample deals from this morning.  Due to the "Bid Week" window, please approve this  bridge enhancement for tonight's migration.  Thank you.

-Dat Truong x63015

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara
Subject:	Sitara EOL Bridge Problem Today

The problem we faced today was due to 2 eol deal packets (2098073, 2099764) not having startdate and enddate.  Missing these 2 tibco message fields caused the bridge to bounce and resulted in the queue to build up while the bridge is starting up. (The bridge takes 2 minute for startup).  Each time these deals are sent/resent, it continuously cause the Sitarar EOLBridge to restart, thus magnifying the buildup of the queue.

The corrective action we are taking at our end is to build a rejection logic when eol packets do not have start and/or enddate.

-Dat Truong


World Watch
The Wall Street Journal, 08/10/01
DJ Enron: UK Teesside Plant May Be Offline For Several Weeks
Dow Jones, 08/10/01

Electric storm: Mild summer and US slowdown stave off Californian crisis
The Independent - London, 08/10/01

The power behind the Teeside plant where three died
The Independent - London, 08/10/01
THIRD MAN DIES AFTER EXPLOSION
Scottish Daily Record, 08/10/01
UK: TEXT-S&P says Teesside Power plant shutdown no economic impact.
Reuters English News Service, 08/10/01
AUSTRALIA: Pacific Hydro seeks 75MW wind farm approval.
Reuters English News Service, 08/10/01
Cepsa, Endesa, others to bid for 25 pct of Gas Natural's Algerian contract
AFX News, 08/10/01
INDIAN POWER MINISTER BRIEFS PM ON POWER SCENARIO
Asia Pulse, 08/10/01
INDIA'S DABHOL RECEIVES CUSTOMS DUTY NOTICE FOR LNG TERMINAL
Asia Pulse, 08/10/01
Enron willing to sell Dahbol stake to India
The Daily Deal, 08/10/01
India: Dabhol Power goes to PM with equity sale offer
Business Line (The Hindu), 08/10/01

India's Prabhu on Enron's Offer to Sell India Project: Comment
Bloomberg, 08/09/01

International
World Watch
Compiled by David I. Oyama

08/10/2001
The Wall Street Journal
A6
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

ASIA/PACIFIC
Enron Seeks to Sell Dabhol Stake to India
U.S. energy company Enron said it wants to sell its 65% stake in Dabhol Power to India's government for at least $1 billion. But India's junior power minister told deputies in Parliament, in a written reply to questions, that the government isn't considering any proposal to buy Enron's stake. Dabhol is caught in a bitter dispute with the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, its sole customer, over tariff levels and payment defaults. General Electric and Bechtel of the U.S. each hold 10% Dabhol stakes, while the MSEB owns a 15% stake. The $2.9 billion Dabhol plant is India's largest foreign direct investment.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

DJ Enron: UK Teesside Plant May Be Offline For Several Weeks
2001-08-10 08:23 (New York)

  LONDON (Dow Jones)--Enron Corp. (ENE) Friday said its 1,875-megawatt Teesside
plant in northeast England may be offline for several weeks.
  Teesside, which suffered an explosion and fire Aug. 8 that killed three
employees, must remain offline during a Health and Safety Executive
investigation which "may take several weeks to complete," Enron said in a
statement.
  "The plant remains offline and no decision on future operations will take
place for several days," it added.
  Following an investigation, Enron will have to submit a safety case for
approval before any portion of the plant may be brought back online, the Health
and Safety Executive has said.
  The process may be complicated by the fact that there has been one previous
fatal incident at Teesside.

Business
Electric storm: Mild summer and US slowdown stave off Californian crisis
Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles

08/10/2001
The Independent - London
FOREIGN
19
(Copyright 2001 Independent Newspapers (UK) Limited)

NOTHING ABOUT California's electricity crisis is turning out as expected.
This was supposed to be the summer of sky-high wholesale prices and non- stop rolling blackouts, but they haven't happened. In fact, if you were to take a tour of the Golden State now you would be hard pressed to notice there was a crisis at all: The lights are on, and everyone is still here.
That's mostly because of a fluke of nature: The weather has been uncannily mild and so demand for air-conditioning and refrigeration systems, in particular, has been significantly reduced.
It also helps, in a perverse sort of way, that the economy has been slowing down, particularly the energy-guzzling hi-tech sector. Consumption fell by 11 per cent in June, even before a round of retail price increases kicked in on 1 July, and by 5 per cent in July.
Contrary to dire predictions, wholesale prices have in fact been falling,
That's not all that has gone against expectations. We heard California's governor, Gray Davis, and his supporters, accuse private energy generating suppliers of "gouging" prices; the worst of them, they said, were based in the president's home state of Texas.
However, power-buying statistics published last month showed that Texas companies like Enron and Dynergy had, in fact, sold California only 10 per cent of its electricity since the beginning of the year - much less than the Canadians, say - and that the highest spot-rate prices of all had in fact been charged by California-based concerns.
We were also told to expect a showdown between California and the federal government. Californians, went the common wisdom, were hapless victims of a failed deregulation that had left them at the mercy of ruthless generating companies; moreover, their appeals for help from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) were falling on deaf ears because the president and his advisors were all in the pocket of those self-same companies.
This picture, too, has been complicated by recent events. Under heavy pressure, FERC has reluctantly agreed to impose reasonably effective price caps, not only on California but on all the western states. At the same time, California's public officials themselves have been shown to be in the pocket of energy companies.
Two veterans of the Gore presidential campaign brought in by Governor Davis recently resigned because it turned out they were simultaneously working for Southern California Edison, one of the state's two giant power utilities. Five other advisors were dismissed because of their personal holdings in energy stocks, while a sixth quit of his own accord. A further eight are under investigation.
The conflict of interest has reached Governor Davis' press spokesman, Steve Maviglio, who agreed last week to sell his $12,000 (pounds 8,450) stake in a California energy company, Calpine, that had been noticeably absent from his public criticisms of the "price- gougers". It has also reached the chairman of the California Energy Commission, Bill Keese, who has just agreed to sell more than $500,000 in energy holdings, some of them in companies that have come before him on regulatory matters.
Given the confusion into which the politics of the crisis has descended, it is tempting to look at the lights burning, both on Hollywood Boulevard and the San Francisco hilltops, and conclude that there is nothing out of the ordinary.
But the crisis is far from over. "It's not over because none of the underlying causes have been addressed," says Mark Bernstein, an energy specialist with the Rand Corporation.
As things stand, California's largest utility, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), is in bank-ruptcy court, and the second-largest, Southern California Edison, is still scrambling around for ways to avoid the same fate. The state government has become the sole official buyer of energy, creating severe imbalances in the budget and effectively putting all non-essential public programmes on hold. (Total energy expenditure in California is expected to reach $70bn this year, compared with $7bn last year, with the state picking up much of the slack.) There are hopes the state could eventually withdraw from the wholesale market, but nobody yet knows how.
There is a complicated court battle going on to secure rebates from the generating companies for over-charging. The rebates could go as high as $9bn, although it is not clear whether the recipients would be the utilities or the state. The rebates will almost certainly get sucked into PG&E's bankruptcy settlement, further complicating the issue.
Meanwhile, the root causes of the crisis have hardly changed: an improperly deregulated market with too few power sources, too little transmission infrastructure, and a dearth of active players in a position to create a truly free market. If nothing changes, Dr Bernstein says, the shortages, uncontrolled price rises and rolling blackouts will simply be postponed until next summer - or whenever the next demand crunch hits.
Much of the political debate has focussed on generating plants - whether local authorities have been too slow to build them, or too reluctant on environmental grounds. But the state of the transmission grid is arguably a bigger problem, not only in California where there is a north-south bottleneck in the San Joaquin Valley, but across the country. Last month, Las Vegas suffered a blackout because there was no way to funnel emergency power supplies there quickly enough. Since there is no direct north-south transmission line through Nevada, the power has to travel either through California (a no-go in the current situation) or through Utah, which was experiencing similarly high demand at the time.
One can anticipate similar problems in New York state and New England, where the dense population makes it hard to build new transmission lines, or in Florida, which has just two electric line connections to the wider United States, both of which were operating at capacity during last winter's peak season. Given the state's continuing population growth, it wouldn't take more than a bit of freak weather or a power plant going down unexpectedly for the great electricity crisis to hit there as well.
"You can build as many power plants as you like, but if you don't have the grid to transmit the electricity they won't do you any good," Dr Bernstein remarked. The White House energy plan recently unveiled focuses almost entirely on energy production; not on distribution or conservation. If implemented in its current form by Congress, it is unlikely - energy specialists say - to do much to alleviate the core US problem.
California's respite this Summer could well be the calm before a much wider storm.

Caption: Los Angeles' CityWalk area during a blackout in May. Analysts are concerned the problems in US electricity supply are not restricted to California AP; Gray Davis: Criticised the electricity companies ; Rolling blackouts closed many shops and businesses in California, like the one above, earlier this year AP
Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

News
The power behind the Teeside plant where three died
Chris Blackhurst

08/10/2001
The Independent - London
FOREIGN
8
(Copyright 2001 Independent Newspapers (UK) Limited)

UNTIL TUESDAY'S explosion that killed three people at its Teesside power station - the third died yesterday - the public profile in this country of the US energy company Enron was pretty low.
The $100bn firm owns Wessex Water but lacks the consumer recognition of other high-profile energy operators such as Exxon, Shell and BP.
But, behind the scenes in high political circles, Enron is extremely well known. It is a company that gives the appearance of securing what it wants - either here, such as when the Labour Government came to office vowing not to allow any more new private gas-fired power stations, only to relent in Enron's case on Teesside, or in the US, where the firm is the best connected of any to the new President, George Bush. Or even in India, where, despite enormous public hostility, it was the driving force behind plans for a massive power station that was built at Dabhol, near Bombay.
In India, Amnesty International compiled a report on the tactics used by the local contractors building the power station to get their own way. It makes for graphic reading: Sugandha Vasudev Bhalekar was in her bathroom at five in the morning when several male police officers entered her house and started beating sleeping members of her family. Mrs Bhalekar, 24, and pregnant, was then dragged from the house into the road and struck on the back with police batons. She said: "My one-and-a-half-year-old daughter desperately held on to me but the police kicked her away."
She was targeted by the police because her husband, Baba, was a leader of those who were protesting against the building of the plant.
Villagers complained they would be overcharged for their electricity, while there were allegations of corruption involving state officials. Local people were also displaced and concerns were raised about environmental damage.
Local constructors paid the state government for the hire of reserve police to protect the site but, in a damning study, Amnesty found the police engaged in a systematic campaign of mass arrests and unprovoked assaults. Amnesty called on the US companies building the plant to safeguard human rights and to establish guidelines for all security personnel at the site.
Amnesty's report - the only one ever produced by the organisation into a commercial project, as opposed to a government - was published in July 1997. The main US company, with an 80 per cent share in the Dabhol plant, was Enron.
Yet in Britain, little more than a year later at the 1998 Labour conference, Enron was able to pay pounds 15,000 to sponsor the party's gala dinner. In all, Enron has given pounds 27,500 to Labour's cause.
When Labour came to power in 1997, there was little prospect, seemingly, of the company's hoped-for Teesside plant going ahead. The Tories had pursued a "dash for gas" policy; Labour, out of a residual support for Britain's coal industry, voiced its opposition. But, within two years, Enron received a special exemption to build at Teesside. By November last year, Labour was right behind the "dash for gas". Stephen Byers, the Trade Secretary at the time, lifted the ban completely, thereby consenting to another Enron project on the Isle of Grain in Kent.
In the world of energy and political lobbying, Enron is king. Simon McRae, of Friends of the Earth, said: "When you look at their influence in Government- policy making, in areas like climate change, they know how to throw their weight around."
Determined to succeed in Britain, the firm hired the political lobbying organisation, GJW. One of GJW's employees subsequently boasted to an undercover journalist how he would ensure Enron would overcome the Government ban on private gas-fired stations. "The way you go about it is that you play on the existing prejudices within the Cabinet for coal, you play on the existing prejudices within the Cabinet for competition, and you play the forces off against each other. It's intimate knowledge of what's going on that produces results in the end."
The lobbyist did well and Enron got its power stations. The company continues to wield influence. This year, it was one of a select group of businesses to accompany Nick Raynsford, the government minister, on a trade mission to Egypt. Ralph Hodge, Enron's European head, has been awarded a CBE for "services to the power generation and gas industries."
Relatively obscure here it may be, but Enron touches us all our lives. In the US, the company was the biggest backer of George Bush. Its chairman, Kenneth Lay, is widely supposed to be one of the new president's energy advisers. Mr Bush is under pressure to reveal the identities of his behind- the-scenes team and it would be a shock if Mr Lay is not one of them: his company even vetted applicants for jobs on the commission regulating the US energy market. The Enron chairman is thought to have also played a key role in the shock decision by Mr Bush to drop the Kyoto global warming accord and to persuade him to open up the hitherto protected Alaskan arctic wilderness to energy exploration.

Caption: Jeffrey Skilling, left, the CEO and president of Enron, speaking yesterday outside the Teesside power plant where an explosion on Wednesday left three dead Richard Rayner
Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

News
THIRD MAN DIES AFTER EXPLOSION
STEPHEN WHITE

08/10/2001
Scottish Daily Record
Streets
36
(Copyright 2001)

A THIRD man caught in a power station blast died yesterday as it was revealed the plant operator has twice been fined for safety breaches.
A fourth victim of Wednesday's explosion at Teesside Power Station is in a stable condition in hospital with burns.
US company Enron moved into the UK in 1989. But during construction of the pounds 850million plant in 1992, a worker died after being run down on the site. The company were fined pounds 17,000, said the Health and Safety Executive.
The second prosecution in 1998 came after a worker was horrifically burned and left unable to work following an blast at the plant two years earlier. Enron were fined pounds 10,000.
But a spokesman for the firm insisted yesterday: "Safety is paramount in all Enron operations and the company strives to prevent all incidents.
"In 2001, the plant was given the Rospa Gold Award for safety.
"Until yesterday, throughout the eight years of operation there had been only one serious incident, in 1996 when an employee was injured in an explosion.
"The cause was traced to a fuel feed pipe joint which had not been tightened after maintenance by the contractor Westinghouse."
Enron's chief executive officer, Jeff Skilling, travelled to Teesside from the firm's HQ in Houston, Texas.
After seeing the accident site, Skilling said: "We pledge to work with the authorities to ensure it never happens again anywhere."
The plant, which employs 100 people and generates electricity for the National Grid using North Sea gas, remains closed.
A joint police and health and safety investigation has been launched into the explosion in an electrical transformer which led to an oil fire.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UK: TEXT-S&P says Teesside Power plant shutdown no economic impact.

08/10/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

(The following statement was released by the ratings agency.
LONDON, Aug 10 - Following a fatal explosion at Teesside Power Ltd.'s 1,875 MW generating plant on Aug. 8, 2001, Standard & Poor's said today that it does not expect the resultant plant shutdown will have a material impact on the plant's economics, if it is able to restart quickly.
It is too early to determine whether the shutdown will have a long-term economic effect on the noteholders at Teesside Power Financing Ltd. (TPFL). The servicing of TPFL's debt notes (BB/Stable) is dependent on adequate dividends paid by the operating company, Teesside Power Ltd., to TPFL.
It is understood that Teesside's short-term power-supply obligations have already been hedged, protecting the plant from high balancing charges under the new electricity trading arrangements introduced in March 2001. The ultimate sponsor and operator of the plant, Enron Corp . (BBB+/Stable/A-2), has not yet determined the extent of the damage. Restarting the plant will be subject to the approval of the relevant safety authorities.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

AUSTRALIA: Pacific Hydro seeks 75MW wind farm approval.

08/10/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

MELBOURNE, Aug 10 (Reuters) - Power generator Pacific Hydro Ltd said on Friday it had lodged planning applications for a 75 megawatt wind farm at Buangor in western Victoria, but the project hinged on development of local turbine manufacturing.
The company last month opened the 18.3 MW Codrington wind farm on Victoria's west coast. Its proposed 150 MW to 200 MW Portland Wind Energy Project is awaiting environmental approval.
Pacific Hydro said it had invited tenders from four wind turbine companies to begin Australian manufacturing if its Portland proposal cleared the approvals process.
"Since we started building the Codrington wind farm the Australian dollar devalued about 15 percent so the economics of importing has changed," Pacific Hydro managing director Jeff Harding told Reuters.
"Our Portland project presents a project of sufficient size to justify local manufacturing."
Companies short-listed to set up Australian wind turbine manufacturing are Enron Corp , Vestas Wind Systems , NEG Micon and Bonus.
Harding said it was hoped the Portland project would clear government regulatory approvals by early next year.
"We hope to have construction start on the Portland wind farm project by the middle of next year," he said.
Clearance of the Portland project would pave the way for the company to move ahead with the Challicum Hills Wind Farm project at Buangor.
Harding said the company had lodged a town planning application with the Ararat Council and it was hoped the project could begin in 2003.
A number of companies are looking at building wind farms, particularly in Australia's southern states, partly due to Federal government legislation requiring retailers to increase their use of renewable electricity.
Pacific Hydro shares ended down nine cents at A$3.99 on Friday while the broader market was down 0.45 percent.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Cepsa, Endesa, others to bid for 25 pct of Gas Natural's Algerian contract

08/10/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd

MADRID (AFX) - Compania Espanola de Petroleos SA, Endesa SA are among a group of companies which will today present bids for 25 pct of Gas Natural SDG SA's supply contract with Algeria, El Pais reported, citing the Economy Ministry.
The ministry has not released details of the potential bidders, the newspaper said, but noted that the four leading Spanish electricity utilities and BP Amoco PLC are known to be participating in the auction.
It said Enron Corp is also thought to be interested in the contract which is currently held by Gas Natural unit Enagas SA.
Last July, the government announced plans to auction part of the contract to other companies operating in Spain's energy sector.
The interested parties must present a business plan for the gas sector for the period 2000-2005, and will also have to provide the sector with an amount of natural gas similar to or greater than that awarded in the contract.
Neither Gas Natural nor Repsol YPF SA, which owns 45 pct of the gas company, are permitted to participate in the auction.
jg/jdy/jkm/ For more information and to contact AFX: www.afxnews.com and www.afxpress.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

INDIAN POWER MINISTER BRIEFS PM ON POWER SCENARIO

08/10/2001
Asia Pulse
(c) Copyright 2001 Asia Pulse PTE Ltd.

NEW DELHI, Aug 10 Asia Pulse - The Indian Power Minister, Suresh Prabhu, has briefed the Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, on the power scenario in the country, including developments on the private sector projects.
The ongoing payment dispute between US energy giant Enron-promoted Dabhol Power Company and its sole buyer the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and another US company AES threatening to pull out of Orissa power distribution are believed to have come up for discussion during the detailed presentation made by Prabhu yesterday evening.
Both Enron and AES are wanting to walk out of the power sector over payment defaults by state utilities.
Yesterday's meeting was attended by the Finance Minister, Yashwant Singh, the Planning Commission, an economic thinktank, Deputy Chairman, K C Pant, the junior Minister for Planning & Programme Implementation, Arun Shourie, the junior Minister for coal, Shahnawaz Hussain, and the junior Minister for Power, Jayawanti Mehta.
The presentation outlined the major issues in power sector including declining trend of capacity addition and presisting shortages, poor financial health of state power utilities, transmission constraints and poor state of rural electrification, an official statement said here.
Outlining the action proposed by Ministry of Power, Prabhu told Prime Minister that to arrest the declining trend in capacity addition, central utilities are targetting an addition of 43 per cent of required MW capacity as against 23 per cent in the 9th Plan.
(PTI) 10-08 1653

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

INDIA'S DABHOL RECEIVES CUSTOMS DUTY NOTICE FOR LNG TERMINAL

08/10/2001
Asia Pulse
(c) Copyright 2001 Asia Pulse PTE Ltd.

NEW DELHI, Aug 10 Asia Pulse - Customs authorities have issued a show-cause notice to Enron-promoted Dabhol Power Company on valuation and rate of duties for goods imported by the company for its LNG terminal.
"Dabhol Power Company received communication on August 3, 2001 from Customs authorities which relates to on-going discussions between the parties on the issues of valuation of imported goods and the rate of duty applicable for aspects of the project," a DPC spokespersons told PTI from Mumbai.
Customs Department is believed to have slapped about Rs three billion duty demand on DPC for its imports relating to the liquefid natural gas (LNG) terminal for the second phase of the $2.9 billion power project.
Asked about the quantum of duty involved in the customs communication, the spokesperson said "we are evaluating it."
He said "while it is quite routine for a project of this size to discuss these kind of issues with customs authorities, we are examining the queries raised therein, and shall be reverting with the due response."
Enron is setting up a 5 million tonnes (expandable to 10 million tonnes) capacity LNG import and regassification terminal at Dabhol, of which only 2 million tonnes would be used as feed stock in the power plant while the remaining being marketed.
Customs department is understood to have raised objection on the premise that since surplus gas would be supplied to other industrial users and therefore the facility is not project specific and so does ot entitle concessional duty, sources said.
(PTI) 10-08 1646

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

M and A
Enron willing to sell Dahbol stake to India
by Claire Poole

08/10/2001
The Daily Deal
Copyright (c) 2001 The Deal LLC

The Houston energy giant is finally willing to sell its 65% stake in the troubled power company to the Indian government in exchange for the money it invested in the project.
After weeks of rumors, innuendo and scattershot comments by executives, Houston energy giant Enron Corp. finally made it official Aug.9: The company is willing to sell its 65% stake in the troubled Dabhol Power Co. to the Indian government in exchange for the money it had invested in the project.
"In the interest of quickly resolving this dispute, Enron has expressed a willingness to forgo expected profits and negotiate terms that would allow the Indian authorities to acquire the foreign stakeholders' interests in DPC," Enron said in a written statement.
Enron insisted, however, that it and co investors General Electric Co. and Bechtel, which each own 10%, recoup all that they had invested in the $2.9 billion project.
"Enron and its partners would still need to recover 100% of their costs," the statement continued. "The company is willing to take this step and forgo significant profits on its investment if the dispute can be resolved amicably with full recovery of our costs in the near term."
Press reports have pegged Enron's investment at $1 billion. Enron spokesman Johan Zaayman wouldn't disclose how much Enron and its partners had invested in the $2.9 billion project.
"We are seeking to sell the equity we've invested in the project, but we're not talking about any specific amounts yet," he said. "It's too early."
John Olson, an analyst at Sanders Morris Harris in Houston, figures Enron has invested about $875 million in equity in the facility.
"I call them 'innocents abroad,'" he said. "They didn't know boo about what they were getting into. In India, you can't win, you can't get even and you can't even get out of the game."
Enron and Dabhol's primary customer, the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, which owns 15% of the project, have been locked in a bitter dispute since April over investment, payment and pricing issues.
Enron has charged MSEB with failing to invest in the project's second phase and defaulting on $45 million in electricity payments.
MSEB countered that Dabhol's electricity prices were too high. It stopped buying power from the facility in May.
Enron's sale of its stake in the project would be a big blow to India. It is India's biggest foreign investment to date, and Enron's departure could scare away other companies from investing in the country.
Arlington, Va., power plant developer AES Corp. is also threatening to leave the country.
Last month, it said it would sell its 51% stake in electric distribution company Cesco unless the state government allowed it to raise tariffs and gave it a better regulatory environment.
On Thursday, AES told state transmission company Gridco to stop supplying power because it has no money to pay it or even salaries for its 8,500 workers.
www.TheDeal.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

India: Dabhol Power goes to PM with equity sale offer

08/10/2001
Business Line (The Hindu)
Fin. Times Info Ltd-Asia Africa Intel Wire. Business Line (The Hindu) Copyright (C) 2001 Kasturi & Sons Ltd. All Rights Res'd

NEW DELHI, Aug. 9. AFTER failing to elicit the support of both the Power and Finance Ministries for a buyout of its troubled project by Central utilities, the Dabhol Power Company (DPC) has approached the Prime Minister, Mr A.B. Vajpayee, with a similar proposal, according to top sources.
In a letter to the Prime Minister, DPC has offered to sell its equity in the project to the Government for $1 billion on a no-profit no-loss basis.
Interestingly, when contacted, DPC chief, Mr Wade Cline, told Business Line that 'a private letter' to this effect had been recently sent to "the Power and Finance Ministry representatives." Mr Kline clarified that so far no company has approached them for buying out their stake in DPC.
The Union Power Minister, Mr Suresh Prabhu, however, maintained that the Power Ministry had not received any such communication. The Power and Finance Ministries have been of the view that their role in resolving the issue would be restricted to finding buyers for phase II of the power project which has a capacity of 1,415 MW.
Even as DPC has knocked at the doors of the PMO, the lenders to the project are at present talking to the stakeholders - MSEB, DPC and the Centre- for reducing the tariff so as to find buyers for the power from the second phase.
Informally, the Centre has been consulted on the possible revenue losses if the duty on the LNG terminal is waived. This is likely to be of the order of around Rs 300 crore. The other variable is the transmission charges for transfer of power to the neighbouring purchasing states.
As per the counter-guarantee agreement between the Centre, State and the DPC, which alone binds the Centre contractually, the Centre's liability is restricted to payment of outstanding energy bills of DPC (for past power sale to Maharashtra State Electricity Board) and payment of foreign debt up to $300 million.
The sequence of events leading up to the DPC communique to the Prime Minister are worth recalling.
Sometime in March this year, the company had informally sent a proposal to the Government to sell its equity in the project for $1 billion.
The report published in this paper was, however, denied.
On June 9 this year, when Enron worldwide chief, Mr Kenneth Lay, met with the Power Minister, Mr Suresh Prabhu, his proposal to the Centre to buyout the project was again shot down. Further, the Enron chief's request to meet with the Prime Minister did not fructify.
Now, nearly two months later, the company has sent a proposal directly to the Prime Minister, seeking his intervention for the Centre to buyout the project for $1 billion.
In Parliament, meanwhile, the Union Minister of State for Power, Ms Jayawantiben Mehta, stated that the Government does not propose to buy out the DPC's equity-holding in the project.
Balaji C. Mouli

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

India's Prabhu on Enron's Offer to Sell India Project: Comment
2001-08-09 22:13 (New York)

     Mumbai, Aug. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Indian Power Minister Suresh
Prabhu speaks on Enron Corp.'s offer to the government to buy out
its $3 billion power project in the country at cost.
     Enron owns 65 percent of Dabhol Power Co, which runs the $3
billion power plant, India's biggest foreign investment. General
Electric Capital and the closely held Bechtel group together own
20 percent of the company.

     ``There's no point in making an offer to the government. Was
it (the offer) a part of the contract?'' between Dabhol and the
state board. ``A seller has to find a buyer.''
     Still, the government will help resolve the seven-month old
payment dispute, Prabhu said.
     ``We will facilitate an early solution to the problem, and to
the mutual satisfaction of the parties concerned. We are not
washing our hands off it.
     ``We have taken number of steps towards reduction of tariff.
I can't give you an absolute number right now as it depends on
variables like fuel costs, capacity utilization. Even lenders have
agreed to lower rates. We are working on the number.''

     Enron wants to exit the venture, as it is owed $64 million by
the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, its only customer, in
unpaid bills. The board in May stopped buying power, saying it's
too expensive.
     Enron said it has invested $875 million in the project. The
plant can generate 740 megawatts of power and Dabhol had planned
to add another 2,184 megawatts of capacity this year.


Concur Expense (XMS) Upgrade!

On July 2, 2001, Enron's Corporate Expense Management Solution will undergo an upgrade to version 6.0.2.
The Integrated Solution Center (ISC) has developed a transition plan containing several important deadlines affecting
all XMS users.

							Transition Schedule

Important Date #1 - Monday, June 18th
?	American Express transactions will no longer be loaded into the current XMS system starting June 18th.  Beginning June 18th, all AMEX transactions will be loaded into the new Concur Expense (XMS) system.
? 	Beginning June 18th, the ISC will be solely responsible for adding new users to the current XMS system.  On July 2nd, new users created in SAP HR will be 	automatically loaded into the new Concur Expense (XMS) system.

Important Date #2 - Wednesday, June 27th
?	This marks the deadline for entering new expense reports into the current XMS system.  All open expense reports in XMS must be submitted and approved 	by June 27th.  All users will be locked out of XMS after this date!!

Important Date #3 - Monday, July 2nd
?	The new version of Concur Expense (XMS ver. 6.0.2) goes LIVE!!!

For a list of frequently asked questions (FAQ), please click on the following link:  http://isc.enron.com/site/xmsfaqs.htm

If you have any other questions on any of the above items, please contact the ISC Call Center at 713-345-4727.


UserName: CAMPB54792

You have an electronic trade confirmation in your Inbox.  To retrieve your
trade confirmation you may login to Datek Online and choose Document Delivery
from the Account Services menu, or you may click on the link below:

https://tumble2.datek.com/posta?x=1-5192829-5169593-AH3M8V3R

You have received this message because you subscribed to electronic delivery
for your Datek Online account.  If you wish to stop receiving account
documents via electronic delivery, you may cancel your subscription by
logging into Datek Online and choosing "Settings" from the
Account Services menu.

For more information please call Customer Support at 1-888-U2-DATEK, or send
email to support@datek.com.

Thank you for trading with us.

Datek Online Brokerage Services
Member NASD / SIPC


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Thome, Stephen
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To:	Murphy, Harlan; Rasmussen, Dale; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Thomas, Jake; Alonso, Tom; Richter, Brad; Crandall, Sean; Scholtes, Diana; Mallory, Chris; Salisbury, Holden; Fischer, Mark; Platter, Phillip
Cc:	Baughman, Edward; Brysch, Jim; Wax, Brandon; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.
Subject:	Conference Call with Houston

Houston has requested we sit down with them on the phone and go over all the in-the-money contracts we have.  By their count we have about 50.  They want to account for each and understand why we may not be delivering on them.

Ed Baughman will be sending his master list in advance of a 11:30 call in Mt. Bachelor.  Please send at least one representative from each of the regional desks to discuss the list.

Thanks,

Steve


Frank:

I am not in favor of this promotion.  I think in the new environment that it
could be negative for him.  Let's talk about it.  Mark

	Frank Sayre@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/05/2001 09:36 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Francisco Pinto-Leite

Mark - I just wanted to touch base with you to confirm that FPL is now an
Assistant General Counsel.   His confirmation sheets states that he has been
promoted to that rank, but I didn't want to convey the new title to him until
I had your confirmation that the promotion was ok with you.   Thanks.


Yes, this would be fine.  Please stop by and mark your day(s) on the calendar that is pinned up on my wall.

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:53 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	Floater

Hi Kim - Would it be alright if I take my 2002 floater day 2/14 pm and 2/15 am?  I've got to take my mother to the Treemont to sign the papers,etc. on Thursday afternoon and then help in the early morning on Friday when the movers come.  Thanks.

Lorraine


For Tom H.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001 01:48
PM ---------------------------

Ron Tapscott@ECT
01/23/2001 11:32 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Booth/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: 501d5a

I have attached two documents below --

Letter directed to SW to address their claim that title had passed --

Updated version of project chronology --

The Project Chronology document indicates letters or correspondence I am
trying to track down from EECC.  I would appreciate your comments on the
letter I plan to send to SW in repsonse to the December 8th fax and any
updates to the chronolgy that appear to be incorrect or lacking.

Please call me if you have any questions.  Thanks, Ron.


Please find the interview packet for the above-referenced candidate.  The
interview will occur on Thursday January 11, 2001.  Please print all
documents for your reference.  A hardcopy of the resume will be delivered via
runner.  If you have any questions, or conflicts of schedule, please do not
hesitate to call me.

Shawn Grady
713-345-8701


Yesterday we agreed in principal to a broker client transaction with Amerex.
the basis of the deal is as follows:

1 year
$500,000 license fee paid in 12 monthly payments
25% brokerage reduction for EnronOnline transactions
EnronOnline transactions may be executed either by clicking or by calling the
trader and requesting to trade on the posted price (they have a contractual
arrangement with Altra that potentialy precludes clicking, they are trying to
negotiate with Altra)
NA Gas; NA Power; Bandwidth and Crude Products

Attached is my cut at an LOI based upon the Natsource model.  We need to get
this out as soon as possible.  Let me know how I can help.


Any idea what this is?
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 09:23 AM -----

	Craig Young
	10/02/2000 09:21 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT,
tj.pimpinelli@mglondon.com
		 cc: Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT, Jon Barrett/EU/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: United States Swaps

Hi Sara

We are Enron Trading Services Inc. (FCM) in New York. We came along with the
MG purchase and report through London.

We handle clear/broker US Futures and act as an IB for Enron Metals Ltd. Our
client base is the Americas with an overlap to Houston.

We would like for funds and commercial clients to have one Swap document
including several commodities and Enron units. For example we understand from
Per that you are working a document for Catequil that should include metal.

Justin

 Could you advise

Thanks
Craig Young
212-715-2342


Sorry..... I am referring to the weather presentation.  I sent the original message last Wednesday.. The meeting is today at 3:00.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bates, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 1:55 PM
To:	Neal, Scott; Taylor, Gary
Cc:	Ames, Chuck; Brawner, Sandra F.; Germany, Chris; Hodge, John; Keavey, Peter F.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; Ring, Andrea; Savvas, Leonidas; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Barbe, Robin; Concannon, Ruth; Goodell, Scott; Jones, David; Kaiser, Jared; Loving, Scott; Muhl, Gil; Smith, Maureen; Smith, Shauywn; Taylor, Craig; Willis, Jim; Zivley, Jill T.; Culotta, Lindsay; Frihart, Bryant; Giron, Darron C.; Mims, Patrice L.; Murrell, Russell E; Pollan, Sylvia S.; Tucker, Patrick
Subject:	RE: meeting this afternoon

I apologize, but the new system had problems and the scheduler just got back with me.

Conf Room 05075


Please see attached. More detail hs been provided on this as we thought
there was a high probability of detailed questions...

Seabron

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

 - 01-01-29-SS Briefing note on market power.doc


Dear Members of the MC, BIC, OC, and TIE List,

Attached, please find the NYISO Weekly Update.  This
Update is written jointly by Elaine Robinson and other
NYISO staff.

The NYISO Weekly Update provides a brief status report of, or
progress on, a range of issues that are under discussion at
NYISO Committee meetings or are being undertaken by NYISO
Staff.  Many, but not all, of these issues are being addressed
through the NYISO Committee structure.

Market participants may raise any comments or questions on
items covered in the Update through the Committee structure,
or directly to Elaine Robinson (erobinson@nyiso.com).

You can find prior editions of the Weekly Update on the
"NYISO Committees" page of the NYISO web site:
http://www.nyiso.com ---> Services ---> Committees ---> Weekly Update

or by clicking on the following link:
http://www.nyiso.com/services/documents/groups/weekly_updates/wkly_updates.html

(See attached file: Weekly081001_r2.pdf)
 - Weekly081001_r2.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 10:44
AM ---------------------------

Parker Drew <Parker.Drew@msdw.com> on 02/06/2001 09:58:41 AM
Please respond to Parker.Drew@msdw.com
To: john.arnold@enron.com, Kenneth E Girdy <Kenneth.Girdy@msdw.com>
cc:
Subject: swaps

Deals #852287, 851654, 851191 unintentionally were traded  as Gas Daily
swaps instead of last day average swaps.  Could you see to it that they
are switched.  Thank you.    Parker


Could you please add Kyle Etter and Victor Guggenheim to all future social
club events?

Thanks,

Eric