---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 08:15 AM
---------------------------

"Inside UT Football"
<InsideUTFootball@dallasnews.com>@newsletters.dallasnews.com on 09/21/2000
12:15:00 AM
Please respond to "Inside UT Football" <InsideUTFootball@dallasnews.com>
Sent by: newsletters@newsletters.dallasnews.com
To: "Inside UT Football Subscribers"
<InsideUTFootball@newsletters.dallasnews.com>
cc:
Subject: Inside UT Football: September 21, 2000

  [IMAGE]  	  [IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	Back to reality

	Sept. 21, 2000

	[IMAGE]Chip Brown, The Dallas Morning News' Texas writer, answers your
questions about what went wrong against Stanford, Coach Mack Brown's response
to the loss, the continuing quarterback controversy, UT players in the NFL
and more. Inside UT Football appears every Thursday.

	E-mail questions to Chip: chipbrown@dallasnews.com

	Listen to Chip Brown talk about the Longhorns on
	dallasnews.com's Colleges site

	CHIP SHOTS

	Every year since 1983, Texas has lost or tied a game in its first four games
of the season. That means UT has had a blemish on its record each of the past
17 years - usually before Texas-OU weekend.

	 Orangebloods spend winter, spring and summer discussing the impact of new
recruits, the prowess of future opponents and the talents of its returning
starters. They spend money on season tickets, airplane tickets and alumni
luncheon tickets. They dream big dreams, and then by October, the high hopes
have usually come crashing down.

	 Only three times since 1983 has Texas opened the season 3-0: 1984, 1985 and
1994. Those starts were then immediately followed by either a tie (1984) or
losses (1985 and 1994). In each of those seasons, Texas ended up with four
losses.

	 In UT's two best seasons since 1983, a 10-2 campaign in 1990 and a 10-2-1
run in 1995, the Longhorns lost their second and third games of the season,
respectively. Before Texas can dream about winning a national title, the
Longhorns have to show they can make it into October without a loss.

	Longhorn Q & A
	 Q: Judging from the Stanford game (as well as the last three games of last
season) it looks like the trend of blitzing the Horns will continue. There is
also no respect for our running game from any team that we face. I think the
best way to end this strategy against us is to become the aggressor on
offense and not sit back passively and react to what the defense is giving
us.

	In order for us to achieve this, I think it starts with us putting our best
athletes on the field on offense. These guys may not be the most experienced
players, but they will gain experience with playing time, and they have the
ability to make a team pay for selling out with the blitz. It's time to start
Roy Williams and B.J. Johnson at receiver (along with Montrell Flowers) and
play a one-back offensive set. Our fullbacks are not a threat offensively and
Hodges Mitchell is not an I-back who is adept at following the fullback
through the hole. Hodges' strength is operating in space and making people
miss in the open field.

	I also think Chris Simms needs to get the bulk of the minutes at quarterback.
Major Applewhite has all the intangibles in the world but Simms could (and
probably does) possess all of the same skills. He just hasn't had the chance
to display them. We desperately need to have all playmakers on the field if
we are going to turn this thing around. If not, I could see this season
slipping to 7-4 real quick. What are your thoughts, Chip?
	 ?? The Jackson residence

	 BROWN:  With any unexpected loss, the tendency is to throw everyone out -
change coaches, players, even the bus driver. You do that and you are telling
this team that you have absolutely no confidence in them. There can't be too
much change at any one time. The big question is how the team responds to
this Stanford loss emotionally. Something tells me if Texas can find some
resolve and perform really well, you'll see some solid performances at all
the positions where problems currently exist. In 1996, Texas was No. 6 and
Notre Dame was No. 9. Texas had the game won in Austin and then lost. UT then
lost three of its next four, which included games against Oklahoma State,
Oklahoma and Colorado - all teams Texas is about to face after this week's
opponent, Houston.

	That was a different coach and different players. But the common thread was
that Texas hit the top 10 and then choked. If Texas is hung over from its
loss to Stanford, trouble could be on the horizon. If Texas can find resolve
to show everyone that Stanford truly was a game in which everything that
could go wrong did, then I think the Longhorns will bounce back and be a hard
team to beat the rest of the way. Tuesday night Mack Brown said the Longhorns
are not a very good football team right now. The challenge has been made to
his team. If they come out and stink against Houston, every position will be
scrutinized, every coach, even the bus driver. There will be enough fire
being thrown in Austin to serve up grilled fajitas for the entire state. But
changes will have to be made constructively and gradually.
	?

	[IMAGE]
	Chris Simms

	Q: What's going on with the quarterbacks?
	?? Mitch Golding

	 BROWN:  As the QBs turn. This week, it appears Chris Simms will start
because he was practicing with the first team on Tuesday. That has been the
trend. Whoever practices with the first team gets the start. Anyway, we'll
see how they respond after the Stanford game. Major Applewhite was erratic in
his play, despite almost leading the Longhorns back from the dead to a
miraculous victory. I'm sticking to my theory that the coaches want to see
what Simms can do against Houston before picking one or the other

	to get solo duty in the Oklahoma and Colorado games.

	Granted, if one struggles along the way, the other will come in. But Mack
Brown said they primarily went with Applewhite against Stanford because of
his experience and the fact that it was the team's first game on the road. He
said they still have all the faith in the world in Simms. It would seem to me
that it takes away the incentive to really take control of the offense, light
it up and get on a roll when you are alternating, but I'll continue to watch
like everyone else.

	I keep trying to remind myself that Brown did this twice at North Carolina
with success. Of course, with those QBs (Oscar Davenport and Chris Keldorf),
Brown had different styles and gained an advantage by forcing the defense to
prepare for Davenport's scrambling and Keldorf's passing. With Simms and
Applewhite you pretty much get the same style. With Keldorf and Davenport,
you also had injuries dictate a few starts.
	?

	 Q: Can you tell us what influenced Mack Brown's decision regarding the
quarterbacks against Stanford?
	?? Nels Marshall

	 BROWN:  Here are Brown's exact words: "Experience. We were in a tight
football game and Major (Applewhite) has been around a long time. I was proud
- even with as poorly as we played offensively in the third quarter - that we
didn't panic. I thought that in the fourth quarter the kids did a great job
of coming back and giving us a chance to win. Sometimes youth doesn't look
like it is trying because they're nervous. Instead, they are trying too hard
and get uptight. Our team tried hard. As negative as people make Saturday
night, it is one of those things that you have to grow from."
	?

	 Q: I'm glad we have two great QBs. My question is, are the receivers having
any problem adjusting to the different spin on the balls coming from a
left-handed or right-handed QB?
	?? Dave Stastny, Austin

	 BROWN:  The receivers say the varying spins are not a factor when catching
the ball. They do, however, say that Chris Simms' ball will come a little
faster and a little harder than Major Applewhite's.
	?

	 Q: The Longhorns are obviously going to play a lot of freshmen this year.
What are the rules on redshirting a player after the season starts? I know
that a player can apply for a redshirt for medical reasons, but can they also
apply for more eligibility or take a redshirt after playing a small amount of
time?
	?? Chad Graham

	 BROWN:  No. Once a freshman plays in a game, even for one play and he does
not suffer a season-ending injury, the chance for a redshirt is out the
window.
	?

	[IMAGE]
	Jermain Anderson

	Q: Have the coaches given any consideration to moving Jermain Anderson back
to linebacker? If I remember correctly, he played LB in high school at Texas
City. He seems to still have good speed, but also a problem putting on the
necessary weight to play defensive end. It just seems like he might be better
suited for the outside linebacker rotation, especially considering the
progress made by young defensive ends like Kalen Thornton, Cole Pittman and
Adam Doiron.
	 ?? Micah Hurt

	 BROWN:  Coaches don't think Anderson has the speed to play linebacker. They
are pleased with the depth at linebacker, as well. They like Anderson's
instincts as a pass rusher. They are still working on his ability to stop the
run.
	?

	 Q: My husband wanted me to write and request that you put the Longhorn
football schedule in your letter each week. My husband, Mark, is a diehard
Texan who was transferred to Oklahoma in 1972. Through thick and thin, he has
remained a loyal Longhorn fan and taken a lot of harassment from the Sooner
fans. Of course, he does his fair share (and probably more) of bragging about
the Longhorns.
	?? Barbara and Mark Harper

	 BROWN:  As far as the schedule, UT's remaining games are:

	Sept. 23 (home) vs. Houston at 6 p.m. on Fox
	Sept. 30 (home) vs. Oklahoma State at 11 a.m. on ABC
	Oct. 7 (in Dallas) vs. Oklahoma, TBA
	Oct. 14 at Colorado, TBA
	Oct. 21 (home) vs. Missouri, TBA
	Oct. 28 (home) vs. Baylor, TBA
	Nov. 4 at Texas Tech, TBA
	Nov. 11 at Kansas, TBA
	Nov. 24 (home) vs. Texas A?at 2:30 p.m. on ABC
	Since you all have access to the Internet, log onto UT's sports Web site
(texassports.com) and learn what radio stations broadcast the game in your
area. And you can read The Dallas Morning News online every day at
dallasnews.com.
	?

	 Q: This may take some research but I was wondering if you could tell me the
number of UT players in the NFL and the status of some recent grads (i.e.
how's Cedric Woodard, Aaron Humphrey, Kwame Cavil). Thanks.

	 BROWN:  The Big 12 office just released a list of former Texas players in
the NFL. However, it includes some players who have been released. For
example, Aaron Humphrey was released after a free-agent tryout with Tampa
Bay. Chris Smith was released after a free-agent tryout with Washington and
Dallas. Jay Humphrey also was released after one year with the Minnesota
Vikings. Kwame Cavil made the Buffalo Bills after going undrafted. Anyway,
here is the list as provided by the Big 12:

	TEXAS (21)
	Ben Adams, OL, Miami
	Taje Allen, DB, St. Louis
	Tony Brackens, DE, Jacksonville
	Blake Brockermeyer, OG, Chicago
	Ricky Brown, RB, Cincinnati
	Chris Carter, DB, New England
	Kwame Cavil, WR, Buffalo
	Phil Dawson, KS, Cleveland
	Shane Dronett, DL, Atlanta
	Priest Holmes, RB, Baltimore
	Aaron Humphrey, DE, Tampa Bay
	Jay Humphrey, OL, Minnesota
	Derek Lewis, TE, St. Louis
	Wane McGarity, WR, Dallas
	Eric Metcalf, WR, Carolina
	Dan Neil, OL, Denver
	Roger Roesler, OL, Cincinnati
	Chris Smith, TE, Dallas
	Winfred Tubbs, LB, San Francisco
	Bryant Westbrook, DB, Detroit
	Ricky Williams, RB, New Orleans
	Cedric Woodard, DL, Baltimore
	?

	[IMAGE]
	Hodges Mitchell

	Q: Don't know whether you can address any or all of these questions in your
column, but I've seen some unflattering trends in Mack Brown's program and
wanted your feedback. Mack Brown is a great recruiter, no argument there.
However, can he motivate? It seems like he can't get the team "up" sometimes
and can't adjust the team's mood during a game.

	About offensive coordinator Greg Davis, I don't know who is responsible for
the offensive line but since it is an offensive group, in more ways than one,
I put it under him. With guys the size that UT has, shouldn't even Hodges
Mitchell be able to run? Who tagged Leonard Davis as a pro? Why does Davis
love Mitchell? Sure, he gained 1,300-plus yards last year, but how many of
those yards were "move

	 the chains" type of runs that allowed UT to hold the ball on the ground and
protect a lead? I thought it was going to be running back by committee but
all we have seen is the coaches continuing the same mistake - abandoning the
run and using the wrong back for the wrong situations.

	Mitchell can run to the outside, but he cannot run through the defensive
tackles. And even if he does get holes, he still will never break through the
linebackers for a TD. Why not put Ivan Williams or Kenny Hayter back there
with Mitchell and go with a two-back, three-wide offense? You don't lose a
receiver as Hodges is a nice, smart receiver.

	Other ramblings: Is Quentin Jammer really a corner? He got beat MANY time
against Stanford. I loved his hitting when he played safety but his injury
may have forever changed his game if he can't play safety and can't keep up
with opponent's wideouts.

	How is the defensive end position shaping up? The defensive tackles were all
over the field against Stanford, but the DEs didn't make much noise. What is
up with the blocked punts? UT should be really, really embarrassed. Does
Stockton take too long? Is he too close to the line? Can the line block? Can
anyone at UT block?

	Does Brown ride the officials who are missing holding calls? Several times
the camera caught clear holds by Stanford's line. Why on earth would you run
up the middle, on your own goal line against two of the best DTs you'll play
against?
	?? Andrew Bowen

	 BROWN:  I think your feelings are shared by many Texas fans who are
incredibly pained, shocked, disappointed, angered and hurt by last Saturday's
events. But in talking to Mack Brown on Tuesday, he said it's fair to beat
the team up for not being able to run the ball. But he said to jump on any
other part of the team is to rip young, inexperienced kids who are still
learning what it takes to compete as a top-ranked team.

	To be fair to Brown, he did say repeatedly that his team was overrated and
needed time to grow into some key positions - receiver, defensive end,
fullback and some positions on the offensive line and at corner. It probably
isn't fair to question whether Mack Brown can motivate because his teams did
beat Nebraska twice, Oklahoma twice and Texas A?once. If a trend develops,
and Texas falls apart the rest of the season, there will be a fair question
about whether Brown did a good enough job of keeping his team's head screwed
on straight. But it's typical after losses to want to shred every part of the
team.

	Brown said before the season that as soon as something went wrong, the
quarterback situation would be blamed. And he was right. The QBs are still
working hard, and look for Simms to start this week against Houston. There's
no question that the O-line is struggling, but so are the backs and so are
the receivers. Brown said only two of the five sacks were the fault of the
line. He said the other three were caused by miscommunication between
Applewhite and the receivers, causing Applewhite to hold the ball too long.

	Mitchell was standing too deep in the backfield against Stanford, so it was
taking him too long to get to the holes. The coaches were not happy about
that. They were yelling at him to move up. He should only be 6 1/2 yards
deep. But he was sometimes at 9 yards. Mitchell also struggled with some
blitz pickup, which is uncharacteristic of him. So look for Victor Ike,
Hayter and possibly Williams to get a little time against Houston.

	Coaches are still high on Jammer. Again, he hasn't played corner much in
games after moving from safety. But coaches are not thinking of moving him.
The defensive end position is a big concern with defensive coordinator Carl
Reese. He is willing to rifle through his whole pile until he finds a couple
who can really play. Cory Redding was better than usual against Stanford. But
that position still needs a lot of work. The blocked punt occurred because
one player, who blocked perfectly on 11 other punts Saturday night, failed to
block a player coming right up the middle, which guarantees doom. That player
has been chewed out every which way.

	As far as the penalties, there were several questionable calls. But Brown,
who did a lot of yelling at officials during the Stanford game, couldn't say
anything about it after the game because he would be fined. Texas can still
have a good season, and perhaps having these problem areas pointed out so
early will help in that direction. We'll see if Texas takes this loss
constructively or destructively.
	?

	 Q: Last year at times I saw blazing speed and ability from Cory Redding. I
know he was considered by many to be the best high school defensive player in
the country in 1998. I've waited all off-season to see him explode against
teams this year. I haven't seen it yet. Maybe this week against Stanford. My
question is, why was he moved from his high school position of linebacker
where he was dominant into the defensive end role where he seems undersized
and average? Is Texas that low on defensive line talent? It seems our
recruiting has been great. Please help me understand. Hook 'em Horns!
	?? Ernie McAnally

	 BROWN:  Redding told me recently that linebacker is still his first love.
But he said coaches came to him last year and said he could get on the field
right away as a defensive end. Coaches also feel that his body (6-5, 260) is
perfect for the DE position. He's tall, athletic, fast and has long arms. In
time, coaches feel Redding will develop into an All-America player. But there
is no question that he has struggled against the run. He made some big plays
against Stanford, recording six tackles, three of them for losses and
blocking an extra point attempt. He is just a sophomore. Over this season and
the next two years, he should only get better.
	?

	 Q: I was watching the regional telecast of the TCU game today and the
announcers  stated that TCU had anted up $90,000 for the Heisman campaign for
LaDainian Tomlinson. How much did UT spend on its campaign for Ricky
Williams' run for the Heisman?

	 BROWN:  Texas didn't spend that much money at all. They produced a few
postcards, a video and a CD-ROM screen saver to send out to the national
media detailing Ricky's accomplishments. But those costs totaled less than
$10,000, according to UT officials.
	?

	 Q: Did any of the freshman who did not play in the Louisiana-Lafayette game
play in the Stanford game? I am watching to see which ones might be
redshirts.
	?? Mike Smith, Houston

	 BROWN:  According to the participation chart provided at the Stanford-Texas
game, Austin Sendlein was the only freshman to play against the Cardinal who
did not play against Louisiana-Lafayette. In addition to Sendlein, here are
the other freshmen who have played so far: WRs Roy Williams, B.J. Johnson and
Sloan Thomas; TE Brock Edwards; DE Kalen Thornton; CB Nathan Vasher; FS
Phillip Geiggar; and DT Stevie Lee.
	?

	 Q: Is it true that in Mack Brown's four or five head coaching stops, his
teams have yet to win a single conference championship? Since UT has lost
four out of its last five games, wouldn't a loss to Houston this week
officially end Mack Brown's honeymoon with the alumni, notwithstanding his
abundant PR program? With Brown about to land his third national Top 5
recruiting class, I believe fans are going to expect more gridiron victories
to go with those recruiting victories.
	?? T. Hough

	 BROWN:  It's true that Brown has yet to win a conference championship in
stints at Appalachian State, Tulane, North Carolina and now Texas. At
Appalachian State, Tulane and UNC, he was taking over absolutely dead
programs. He took Tulane to a bowl, and he had Florida State to deal with in
the Atlantic Coast Conference while at UNC. But he took UNC to six bowl games
in his 10 years at UNC and won four of them.

	A loss to Houston would certainly intensify the frustration of Texas
faithful. But I think anyone who would be looking to put Brown on the hot
seat or rip him if Texas lost to Houston would be overlooking the job he has
done beating Nebraska (twice), Oklahoma (twice) and Texas A?(once) in his
first two seasons here. He has also turned Texas back into a destination
school for top recruits and brought the UT community back together. In
addition to all that, he has done more good for UT out of the limelight than
probably most Texas fans realize.

	Brown is now in the same spotlight as Bobby Bowden, John Cooper, Lloyd Carr,
Steve Spurrier and Phil Fulmer. Any unexpected losses are unforgivable in the
eyes of fans. It may take some time for Brown and his team to adjust to that.
UNC fans were pretty ho-hum about everything the Tar Heels did in football,
even when they won big. Brown wanted to win at a school with huge
expectations. He'll have to adjust now that it appears Texas will be starting
out the next few seasons in the Top 10.
	?

	 Q: Is Lee Jackson out for the Houston game?
	?? Marty Bonner

	 BROWN:  Jackson is out for the Houston game with a hamstring pull suffered
against Stanford. He may also miss the Oklahoma State game. Mack Brown said
this is a bad week to be without Jackson because Houston can throw the ball
really well.
	?

	 Q: Is Ricky Williams' jersey being retired at the Oklahoma State game Sept.
30?
	?? Mark Wilson

	 BROWN:  Yes. Williams' No. 34 will be retired at that game. Williams has
said he will be there because the New Orleans Saints are off that weekend.
Host Communications has also just finished a video biography on Williams that
will be available soon.
	?

	 Q: What did Mack Brown say about the expectations surrounding his team after
the loss to Stanford?
	?? Virginia Blair

	 BROWN:  Again, here are Mack's words: "I said during the pre-season that we
were overrated. I didn't see any reason with the youth, the way we finished
last year and the inexperience across the board that we should have been a
Top 5 football team. One of the great things about Texas is that you receive
a tremendous amount of attention and publicity, but in some cases people want
to push you too fast to get to the top. I think that we were in that position
and expectations got out of hand. I knew that we would have a difficult game
at Stanford and that it would be a tough game to win. I also didn't think
that we deserved to be ranked fifth in the country. Our current rank within
the Top 15 is much more fitting for where we are today."

	 If you received this newsletter from a friend and would like to subscribe,
sign up at:   Newsletter Registration

	To find or change your password, modify your account, or unsubscribe from
this newsletter, go to:   Newsletter Registration

	Questions?    Comments?  Suggestions?

	   (c) Copyright 2000 The Dallas Morning News
		[IMAGE]

			  [IMAGE]
			  [IMAGE]
			  [IMAGE]


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Harvey Morris Esq.
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco, California   94102

  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power
Marketing, Inc. ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Inc. ("EESI"), Enron Energy
Marketing Corporation ("EEMC"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. (EESO)
and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland General")(collectively
sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")

Harvey,

 Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued by
the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the Commission").  We
make these proposals pursuant to our email exchange of October 3, 2000 with
the understanding that the Commission agrees that by cooperating, offering
to produce or producing documents, these entities have not waived any
objections or challenges to these subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims,
defenses, objections, jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have
been specifically reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.
For all of these proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from
disclosure by the attorney client and attorney work product privileges.

GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 1 through 4

 The Enron Entities have been very dynamic organizations having
acquired, sold, divested, joint ventured, spun off and otherwise reorganized
themselves extensively during the past two years.  The burden and expense on
Enron to locate, and produce every corporate organizational chart anywhere
in its organization since April 1, 1998 is significant.   The Enron entities
will provide the Commission with exemplars of its current organizational
charts, telephone directories and so called "family trees" to show its
current organization.  To the extent that Enron can readily identify and
locate exemplars of significant organizational charts, telephone directories
or so called "family trees" for earlier periods it will also make those
available.  One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its
corporate history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can
provide it.  With respect to the other entities, to the extent that
corporate histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate
producing these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.

Requests 5 and 6

 The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction Data
will identify its customers and suppliers.

FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 7 through 11

 The Enron Entities will produce its public filings for the period
requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, ESSI, and Portland General
will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data for the purchase
and sale of energy delivered which includes economic data.   We anticipate
producing public filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and
the transaction data in the second wave of document productions.

GENERATING DOCUMENTS
Requests 12, 14 and 18

 For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
facilities are very small and there will probably be limited documents
available.  The Enron Entities to the extent they act as a scheduling
coordinator or possessed the right to use or resell generation output, do
not have the specific documents that pertain to each generation unit
requested.  The Enron Entities, other than Portland General, do have
documents and information for Enron Wind, Saguaro and Las Vegas
Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
document productions.
 For Portland General, there will be a very large volume of documents
and we propose to handle them differently.  First, Portland General will
provide for year 2000 electronic data in summary form similar to the data
being provided by other Enron Entities to the extent relevant.  With respect
to specific generating cost data, because of the volume, we suggest that
these documents be made available in Portland for inspection from a
representative sampling of facilities.  If there are specific documents that
the Commission would like copied from that production, we can discuss the
arrangements for producing these documents.  We propose to make these
documents available in Portland in a third wave of document productions

TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
Request 13, 15, 16, 17, 19

 We understand that the CPUC will be obtaining trading data for the
purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and PX.
EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of trading data for
year 2000 (in California and outside of California and Real Time) for the
purchase and sale of energy delivered with the date, counterparty, quantity,
delivery point, hours, price, and whether it is purchase or sale.   Because
of the speed with which you want this information, it is possible that some
entries will be incomplete or inaccurate.  For those transactions where EPMI
served only as the scheduling coordinator, we understand that the ISO will
show part of the transaction, but there will not be a corresponding
transaction in the EPMI data we can provide quickly.  The reason is that
this type of transaction is passed through to EPMI's customer on an
accounting system rather than as part of the trading business.  EESI can
also provide similar electronic data with the proviso that it will not
include the specific names of its retail customers but instead will provide
a blind customer number.  Many of ESSI's customers have agreements whereby
they must be notified of any subpoena and provided an opportunity to object.
ESSI cannot meet your time frame to release information and give its
customers the notice they require.  We anticipate producing the transaction
data in the second wave of document productions.

FERC DOCUMENTS

Request 20

 The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October 13,
2000.

 Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
production by then.

 We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one currently
in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions will be
protected by the most stringent protective order.

 We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
or myself.

Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP

Gary Fergus

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


missing deal for chris

sell mirant
may
25 mw
215.00
np15
off peak

586762
broker has pacificorp, not ppm


Once again, just to remind you, there will be a catered dinner tonight.  As
always it will be in the Wells Fargo room from 7:30 to 8:15.

Tonight's dinner is called "Burrito Fiesta."  Est muy bien!
Seung Lee
Program Assistant
Haas School Of Business
Evening MBA Program


Michael:
FYI.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/24/2001 04:26 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/24/2001 12:57 PM

		 To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
skean@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron,
Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS; Davis Staff Admit that DWR Costs for
Purchases Is Staggering and Rates Must Increase Dramatically; PG&E says it
will sue over QF payment plan; Mike Kahn Takes Pot Shots in Editorial
Defending Davis/Lynch

Please see the following important stories.  It appears to be quickly
slipping through Davis' fingers.  May be useful to re-group a bit in light of
the following events.  In sum:

Most importantly, in today's Chronicle, it's reported that Davis' staff met
with key Democrats yesterday and lowered the boom.
DWR purchases likely to be about $25 billion and rates may have to go up by
100%.  (See attached story.)
Apparently, one of the big reasons that 8X got held up yesterday is because
Davis' own staff went to D leadership and said, "don't move 8X (a bill that
Davis was said to support) because the $10 billion cap on bonds won't work;
they need much more."
It appears that rate increases will now become part of the mix, whether Davis
likes it or not.
The staff alleged that they were conveying the information before Davis had
been informed of the "bombshell."
Davis was criticized for being at yet another fund-raiser yesterday while the
situation significantly deteroriated in Sacramento.  (See attached story.)
Meanwhile, PG&E has sued--or may be about to sue--the State, saying they
won't pay the QFs according to Davis' plan (which the PUC is supposed to
implement on Tuesday).  (See attached PG&E press release.)
Finally, Mike Kahn has issued an opinion piece in yesterday's Chronicle, in
which he attempts to lump together into one pile Republicans, market
proponents, price gougers and Texans, and defending Davis and Lynch.

******************************************************************************
***********************************************************************
Davis' Measured Plan To Fight the Darkness
Michael Kahn
Friday, March 23, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/23/E
D103778.DTL
COMMENTS on Gov. Gray Davis' energy programs by apologists for former Gov.
Pete Wilson bring to mind Robert Kennedy's admonition that it is better to
light a candle than curse the darkness.
Let's examine the darkness created by Wilson's energy deregulation scheme.
The 1996 law he signed could not have been more wrong headed.
-- Why did it hand energy price control over to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission?
-- Why did it free wholesale prices, while capping the price utilities could
charge customers?
-- Why did the former state Public Utilities Commission force utilities to
sell off their fossil fuel power plants, leaving them vulnerable to predatory
pricing by out-of-state merchant generators?
-- Why did the Wilson-era PUC bar utilities from entering into contracts to
ensure a long-term supply of cheap electricity?
-- Most pointedly, why did California enter into deregulation without enough
available generation to ensure a fair market based on balanced supply and
demand?
These are tough questions. It is not hard to understand why former proponents
of the 1996 deregulation scheme would rather not answer them, preferring to
bemoan the darkness and curse Davis' actions.
The Wilson apologists jeer at plans for the state to purchase the power grid,
though they surely know the value of a well-maintained, fully functioning
electric transmission network. Bottlenecks in the grid impede the sharing of
power between Northern and Southern California. This was a main reason
Northern California experienced rolling blackouts in January while Southern
California had plenty of power.
The state's purchase of the grid will infuse new cash into the utilities,
pulling them back from the brink of bankruptcy, while giving the state a
tangible and valuable asset in exchange.
And ownership of the grid will allow the state to modernize it, removing
bottlenecks and upgrading technology - something the utilities have long
failed at doing.
The apologists ignore the state's strong record on energy conservation and
Davis' actions to enhance these efforts.
California now has the nation's second-best energy conservation record. The
governor has budgeted $404 million in new conservation measures and added an
executive order offering 20 percent rebates to those who reduce their
consumption 20 percent over last year. These measures will reduce commercial
lighting, encourage residential and industrial efficiency and make state and
commercial buildings more energy efficient.
The apologists disregard the fact that the governor has also reversed a trend
that had seen power plant construction in California drop to insignificance
in the '80s and '90s. Since April 1999, the California Energy Commission has
licensed nine major new power plants. Six are under construction. This is
part of a streamlined, fast-track plant licensing process that aims to put an
additional 20,000 megawatts on line by the summer of 2004, a nearly 50
percent increase in generation.
And the apologists refuse to recognize that California is building the right
sort of power plants - efficient, clean and environmentally friendly, with a
strong bent toward renewable power sources.
In fact, while some would go Texas' route and build plants that meet only the
bare minimum of environmental requirements, California is continuing the
effort that has made it the nation's leader in the use of clean, renewable
power sources.
Instead, the apologists engage in name calling, such as the charge leveled by
former Wilson communications director Dan Schnur on this page that Loretta
Lynch, the Davis appointee as PUC chair, is inexperienced and has failed to
deal effectively with the energy emergency.
Forget for a moment that of the 22 people who have served as PUC
commissioners since 1980, only six had any energy expertise before their
appointments.
Forget for a moment that one of the principal architects of deregulation was
Daniel Fessler, the UC Davis contract law professor with no special expertise
in energy issues whom Gov. Wilson appointed as PUC president.
Just consider this: It was the PUC under Lynch that freed the utilities to
buy electricity on cheaper, forward contracts outside the Power Exchange.
This corrected a huge Wilson-era PUC blunder that put utilities in an energy
price straitjacket. The Lynch-led PUC also prohibited utilities from selling
additional power plants, and it began the successful effort to make
California's ISO (the Independent System Operator that runs the state's power
grid) independent of the industry-connected officials who controlled it.
Meanwhile, what sort of grand solutions have the apologists presented? Drill
for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, build nuclear
plants on closed military bases and encourage the construction of dirty
Texas- style power plants in California.
Drilling in the Arctic will not produce a watt of new power for California.
Californians have long said they do not want the risks presented by new
nuclear plants.
And lax Texas pollution rules prompted the Dallas Morning News to charge in a
Dec. 17 editorial that Texans are choking on the exhaust from power plants.
Most disingenuously, the apologists would "let the market work," claiming
that unfettered market forces will soon bring fair and balanced prices. But
the market doesn't work now, as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has
repeatedly admitted, most recently with its finding that generators
overcharged the state in January.
Unfortunately, for the most part the same commission had refused to clamp
down on sky-high prices charged by generating companies. Look at New York's
deregulated market, where there are no caps on retail electric prices. Market
forces have done consumers there little good. New Yorkers pay the highest
prices for electricity in the country. And the New York Times has reported
that rates paid by consumers have increased a whopping 40 percent just since
1999.
Those who would allow the market to work (let the darkness reign) know well
that if the market "works" to produce New York-style rate increases in
California, the consequences to the public would be dire.
Compare this to Gov. Davis' well-structured plan for effective energy
conservation and stabilization of the state's electricity market and his
expedited program to bring clean, efficient new power plants on line quickly.
Robert Kennedy would understand Gov. Davis' approach and his critics'
perspective.
Michael Kahn is a member of the state Independent System Operator's board of
governors.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 25

Bombshell Warning on Power Cost
Spending may double and rates skyrocket, governor's office tells Legislature
Greg Lucas, Lynda Gledhill, Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday, March 24, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/24/M
N176940.DTL
Top Davis administration officials told lawmakers yesterday that the state
may have to spend twice as much as expected on electricity purchases over the
next two years - requiring rate increases of as much as 100 percent.
The stunning admission by the Davis administration contradicts his repeated
promises that his plan to ease California's energy woes could be done without
a rate increase.
California will probably need to issue $23 billion in bonds for electricity
buys, more than double the amount Davis said would be needed by the state to
keep electricity flowing until California's cash-poor utilities can get back
on their feet.
Administration officials told lawmakers to stop action on a bill that would
have capped the state's energy purchases at $10 billion.
But a Davis spokesman said the numbers were far from firm.
"There are a lot of scenarios being run . . . and until we complete the
negotiations, this can be added up any way you want," said Steve Maviglio,
press secretary to Davis.
"Those numbers are not based on any reality right now," he said. "There are
too many things up in the air."
Assembly Democrats told a different story.
They said Tim Gage, director of Davis' Department of Finance, Cabinet
Secretary Susan Kennedy and John Stevens, Davis' top energy aide, met with
Assembly Democratic leaders and dropped the bombshell.
And they did so just as those same leaders were trying to convince fellow
lawmakers how important the bill was to the Davis administration.
They also said that Davis, who was in the Palm Springs area for most of the
day and briefly attended a fund-raiser at a golf club, was unaware of the
figures.
PURCHASES IN BILLIONS
The three top aides said that electricity purchases for this year by the
state would be $16 billion, not the $10 billion initially predicted. An
additional $7 billion in state power purchases would be needed next year,
they said.
The state has been buying power at a clip of $45 million a day since Jan. 17
because the troubled utilities could no longer afford to make the purchases.
From the start of the energy crisis, the state has planned to repay its power
purchases through bond sales. The bonds would be paid off by a portion of the
amount ratepayers are charged on their monthly bills.
Davis has so far insisted that enough money could be found to cover the $10
billion without raising rates.
But his aides said if the size of the bonds ballooned to $23 billion, a hefty
rate increase would be necessary.
INCREASE UPON INCREASE
The Public Utilities Commission is already planning to make permanent a
temporary 9 percent increase. An additional automatic 10 percent is scheduled
for no later than March 2002.
But the aides said, on top of that, an additional 60 percent to 80 percent
increase would be required to cover the debt service.
"For some time, I have believed a fundamental part of solving this problem is
admitting there needs to be a rate increase, and the numbers that have been
shared today make that inevitable, and we should start dealing with the
reality as soon as possible," said Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek
(Santa Cruz County).
One consumer advocate said the revelation means the utilities are closer to
bankruptcy because the state and ratepayers won't have the cash to bail them
out.
And it could mean political trouble for Davis.
"Unless the governor issues an ultimatum to lower the prices, everybody's
bill will double, and he will not be able to run for re-election in 2002,"
said Harvey Rosenfield, head of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights.
PG&E THREATENS SUIT
The news came as Pacific Gas and Electric Co. threatened to take the state to
court over Davis' plan to force the company to pay back certain creditors.
Davis' proposal would require the utilities to pay alternative power
generators for all the power that they supply, something PG&E said it cannot
afford to do. Several of the generators shut down earlier this week as
rolling blackouts spread across the state.
The bill stalled yesterday in the Assembly as Republicans objected. Lawmakers
will resume debate Monday.
Earlier in the week, Davis announced that action would be taken by the
Legislature and the Public Utilities Commission that would guarantee payment
to the alternative energy providers. He also said the state -- which has
spent $3.7 billion to purchase power -- should be paid back first.
Without that promise, several of the small biomass, solar and wind producing
plants -- called qualified facilities -- said they would have taken Southern
California Edison Co. into bankruptcy court. The alternative generators
provide enough electricity to power roughly 6 million homes.
PG&E said it cannot afford to pay the alternative producers and reimburse the
state for the billions it has spent purchasing power.
"These actions approach the problem in a piecemeal and uncoordinated fashion
and would force us to pay out far more than we collect in rates, further
exacerbating an already precarious financial situation," Gordon Smith, PG&E's
president and chief executive officer, said in a statement.
DIFFERING VIEWS ON COSTS
According to PG&E's numbers, the company collects $400 million a month in
rates. It says the average price to pay all the generation sources exceeds
$1. 4 billion a month.
But consumer advocate Nettie Hoge said the utilities are exaggerating their
own costs in order to try to keep as much money as possible.
"It's just absurd," said Hoge, the head of The Utility Reform Network. "They
have a temper tantrum every time something doesn't go their way."
The bill PG&E objected to is necessary to allow the PUC to order utilities to
pay small power generators who agree to sign lower-priced contracts to
provide energy.
The proposal offers generators a choice of agreeing to a five-year contract
at $79 per megawatt or a 10-year deal at $69 per megawatt, Davis said. The
going rate now is about $150 a megawatt. The PUC wants to act as early as
Tuesday to bring some financial relief to the generators, who have been paid
pennies on the dollar.
Assembly Republicans objected to the bill in part because it would allow the
PUC to change the formula for setting the price paid alternative producers so
that it no longer considered the price of natural gas.
Co-generators -- some of the largest of which are operated by oil refineries
-- say without the price of natural gas as a consideration, it would cost
them more to produce energy than what they would be paid for it.
E-mail Lynda Gledhill at lgledhill@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1

Davis at Fund-Raiser as His Bill Languishes
Critics say he should have been at Capitol
Greg Lucas, Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday, March 24, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/24/M
N171337.DTL
While the Assembly struggled -- and failed -- to pass a bill aimed at keeping
hundreds of small energy generators from bankruptcy, Gov. Gray Davis attended
a $10,000-a-head golf fund-raiser yesterday in Palm Desert.
Organized by Duane Dauner, president of the California Healthcare
Association, the event was held at Bighorn Golf Club, a luxurious private
country club of which Dauner is a member.
Davis' top political adviser said the governor didn't play golf, just stopped
by a luncheon before the round began so he could return to Sacramento.
But during Davis' absence, a bill he backed -- critical to bailing out small
power generators -- languished in the Assembly.
On Thursday, lawmakers canceled next week's long-planned annual trip to
Washington, D.C., to focus on energy issues.
"There is not a lot of electricity to be found on the golf course," said
Harvey Rosenfield of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a chief
critic of Davis and the state's utilities. "He ought to be in Sacramento to
try and solve the crisis and not prospecting for contributions in the grass
in Palm Springs."
The Democratic governor has been frequently criticized for the time he spends
raising money for his campaign fund, money that comes from well-heeled
interests with dozens of issues pending before his administration.
Since becoming governor, Davis amassed $25 million by the end of 2000 --
averaging more than $1 million a month in contributions, often from fund-
raisers directed at specific industries.
Garry South, Davis' political adviser, said Davis was in Palm Springs to
dedicate a University of California building and "dropped by a lunch"
preceding the golf.
South said the fund-raiser "was a diverse group of people that paid varying
amounts of money."
Lawmakers canceled their yearly visit to federal officials on issues
important to the Golden State because they didn't want to give the impression
that "there was somewhere else more important than California," said state
Sen.
Don Perata, D-Oakland.
Raising money at a tony golf resort during the crisis simply looks bad,
Perata said.
"We have to be really careful because the public's patience and their
confidence in what we're asking them to do depends on how they see us
reacting to the problem," he said. "This will be negatively interpreted."
Other lawmakers said the governor's top-level staff was working on the
problem but acknowledged the golfing fund-raiser looked bad.
"It's not the best symbolic message, but I feel we have to give him the
benefit of the doubt," said Assemblywoman Carole Migden, D-San Francisco.
Davis did appear briefly yesterday on nationally broadcast CNBC to talk about
the energy crisis and blast power generators for allegedly overcharging the
state. He appeared live from Palm Springs.
The California Healthcare Association represents nearly 500 hospitals and
boasts on its Web site that it "influences public policy development through
both legislative and regulatory advocacy efforts."
Last month, the group introduced a legislative package to expand nursing
education and streamline college requirements for nurses.
One of the bills calls for spending $120 million a year on nursing classes.
The group also is lobbying the new Department of Managed Health Care, which
is staffed by Davis appointees, to speed up payment of $1 billion in late
bills owed to hospitals.
Davis signed a bill last year that gave the HMO czar the power to sanction
health care plans for failing to pay Dauner's clients, the hospitals, on
time.
In his first six months in office, Davis attended a fund-raising dinner at
Dauner's house that brought in an estimated $100,000. It was part of a spree
that netted the governor a record-breaking $6.1 million in half a year.
At the time, Dauner told the Los Angeles Times: "We don't talk policy at
those kinds of things, or legislation. This was really more of a social
event. He talked about his goals and probably spent more time discussing
education than anything else."
Dauner could not be reached for comment yesterday.
E-mail the reporters at glucas@sfchronicle.com and bsalladay@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 13

	FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 23, 2001
CONTACT: PG&E News Department (415) 973-5930

PG&E Responds to Energy Proposals in Sacramento
	San Francisco -- Pacific Gas and Electric Company today announced that it
will be forced to challenge actions now being contemplated by the State of
California to impose new demands on its frozen rate structure. The proposed
actions will destabilize its current situation with creditors and put the
entire possibility of reaching a balanced solution to California's energy
crisis at risk.
	This week, the State has made clear its intention to use Pacific Gas and
Electric Company's existing rate structure to begin fully paying Qualifying
Facilities (QFs) in advance, for future power purchases, starting April 1,
and to reimburse the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in advance of any
other generating source, including utility-retained generation, bilateral
contracts, QFs or the Independent System Operator (ISO).
	"These actions approach the problem in a piecemeal and uncoordinated fashion
and would force us to pay out far more than we collect in rates, further
exacerbating an already precarious financial situation," said Gordon R.
Smith, president and chief executive officer of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company. "The numbers just don't work."
	Currently, under frozen rates, Pacific Gas and Electric Company has been
collecting approximately $400 million per month for the purchase of electric
power. This revenue has been used in payments to power suppliers, including
power purchases from irrigation districts and bilaterals, to cover costs of
operating our retained generation, and is insufficient to cover payments to
the ISO and QFs. The average combined energy bill from all of these sources
exceeds $1.4 billion a month, and may go even higher in the coming months.
Moreover, the utility's financial condition has been further jeopardized by
the failure of the DWR to acknowledge responsibility for the full "net open
position," i.e. the power that must be purchased on the spot market. This
dispute over the net open position is threatening to accrue additional
liabilities for Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
	"We continue to work with State officials to develop a constructive,
comprehensive solution that assures that California has a reliable and fairly
priced supply of power. Nevertheless, we have a duty to our suppliers,
lenders and shareholders to protect the assets of the utility, and we must
challenge any action by the State to force us to pay out more than is
collected in rates," Mr. Smith concluded.
	?


Gina/David, I think we need to have some guidelines for these types of questions.  My view is that we should encourage people to be contacted while out on leave to identify reviewers and submit a self-evaluation.  Presumably, if they have a Click at Home PC, they can do it from there.  If not, we should be able to facilitate it manually.  Your thoughts?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 09:10 AM -----

	Kim Cadena@EES 05/21/2001 06:15 PM 	   To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: PRC for individuals on leave

Michelle,
I received the below message, but still have questions:

If someone has been on leave for less than 12 weeks, but is currently out, what should we do in terms of selecting reviewers for them?  Should the supervisor select?  What should we do in terms of the self evaluation of listing 5 accomplishments that will be flashed on the screen during PRC meetings?  Should we just leave theirs blank?  If it is blank will it be viewed as a negative?  Can the supervisor contact the individual at home to ask them who they want for reviewers and what do they want to put for 5 accomplishments?  If the employee knows that we are going through this process and wants to select reviewers and do their accomplishments from home, should we allow that since they are on leave?

Sorry to throw all of these questions at you, but the EES HR group has thrown them at me and I agreed to send you one e-mail to keep from all of us contacting you.
Also, I need to get information from you on what to do in submitting my list of PRC attendees to you for review in terms of diversity.  It would be helpful if I understood what exactly you want and what you are looking for.

Any gudance you can provide on these matters would be appreciated.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Cadena/HOU/EES on 05/21/2001 06:06 PM ---------------------------
From:	Teri Ashley/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/18/2001 10:07 AM
To:	Kim Cadena/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Chalk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, Jana Domke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Belinda McGaughy/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Lee Brace/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Willie Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry Chatham/ENRON@enronXgate, Ann Vaughn/ENRON@enronXgate, Roger Sumlin/ENRON@enronXgate, Kathleen Blankenship/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, johnpa@nepco.com@SMTP@enronXgate, robinj@nepco.com@SMTP@enronXgate, gloriari@nepco.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Ron James/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	FW: FW: Performance Review

NOTE - see below

Thanks
Teri

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 9:08 AM
To:	xxxx
Cc:	Corteselli, Gina
Subject:	Re: FW: Performance Review

We have decided that someone who is out for more than 12 weeks during the review period should not be reviewed.  That guideline should be communicated to all of HR soon.  Michelle

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From:  Lundstrom, Bruce
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:47 PM
To: Stephanie Harris@ENRON; Walls Jr., Rob; Mark E Haedicke@ECT
Cc: Rogers, Rex
Subject: Dabhol -- A Brief Legal Update

Gentlemen -

A few updates:

The lender meetings in Singapore this week have been challenging.  The Indian
banks are trying to induce the foreign banks to fund into a project with a
repudiated PPA.  It is becoming more apparent to us that the Indian banks are
being heavily influenced by the Government of India and not acting as
commercial institutions.  Our business people do not believe that all or most
foreign banks will continue funding at this point.  It is likely that the
Indian banks could act on their own to cure the construction contract
payments which give rise to termination this month (about $34 million).
Within a few months, however, the Indian bank facility would be fully funded.

Today, we filed our writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging MERC's
jurisdiction.  While we have a hearing date scheduled on Monday, there is
some doubt whether or not we will get a hearing on that date.

Bruce


Gentlemen,

I recommend that we purchase this package and split the cost 3 ways between 3
power trading desks.
I think that we should go for option 3 (~ $15,000).

Lance Cunningham in my group looked at this software package and found it
very useful for modeling transmission problems.
Please, feel free to ask him for technical details in support of this
recommendation.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
09:17 AM ---------------------------

Lance Cunningham@ENRON on 11/09/2000 06:15:14 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Site License for Power World

Vince,

We have three options to increase our availability across Enron for the Power
World load flow software.

Option 1, Upgrade to a site license for the load flow software only. Price
$9,990.00
This would give all of Enron the ability to perform load flows, but not
determine marginal cost or available transfer capacity (ATC) because only the
Optimal Power Flow (OPF) version can perform that task.

Option 2, Site license for the load flow and purchase 1 OPF package for
Walter Coffer's group.  Price $11,240.
This would give all of Enron  the ability to perform load flows and one other
group the ability to determine marginal cost and ATC.

Option 3, Site license for load flows, OPF and ATC.  Price $14,990.00
This would give all of Enron  the ability to perform load flows, marginal
cost, and ATC.

Regards,
Lance


Are we working on this in Sacramento?  Do we have language?  What is the
level of interest?

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 09:05 PM -----

	Mark Fillinger@ECT
	02/28/2001 02:18 PM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Hap
Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: QF Meeting Today--Highlights

For the last two days I participated in the negotiations between several QFs
and the utilities regarding implementation of SBX 47. The goal of the meeting
was to present a substantially complete "Agreement of Long-Term Gas Purchase
Arrangement"  to Battin this Thursday. Through this document they intend to
describe what the parties have agreed to and the changes required in the bill
to conform to the parties agreement.

Attendees included PG&E and SDG&E (SCE is clearly opposed to the bill),
Calpine, El Paso, Sithe and the CCC represented by White and Case. It appears
that SDG&E's support for the bill is weakening with their mantra being "if
this doesn't guarantee a price reduction over the five years we won't support
the bill." We explained that the goal is not so much overall price reduction
as price stabilization, with current period price reduction. PG&E clearly
gets it.

I was successful in introducing and inserting the financial hedging option
into the Gas Agreement. Both PG&E and SDG&E are very supportive of such an
option as they are currently prohibited from entering into such arrangements.
It is less clear if the large QFs are supportive. Their primary goal is to
find a safe harbor from the Wood decision for the next five years. I also
believe the proposed gas procurement structure provides some option value to
the larger QFs.

Although it looks like our language will be in the Gas Agreement, I think we
need to get some language in the bill itself. I am working with Sandi and
Mike Day to make that happen. We may also want to add the concept of economic
dispatch to the bill. Mike, do you have any suggested language that I could
forward to Sandi and Mike Day? Finally, I suggest we try and set up
individual meetings with the utilities (including SCE) to discuss our ideas
further. I'm not sure what other conversations are occurring with the
utilities, but I would be happy to set up the meetings with the appropriate
people.

Thanks,

Mark

	Alan Comnes
	02/27/2001 08:32 PM

		 To: David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fillinger/SF/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: QF Meeting Today--Highlights

Despite the fact the bill, by itself, does not guarantee payment for overdue
receivables, the QFs on today's call decided to go forward and push for SBX
47 irrespective of the progress on SBX 33.  A press conference is planned for
Friday by IEP.  Bowen, who heads up the first committee that this bill will
go through will have hearings on this bill on Tuesday at the earliest.

Jan S-J asked every QF to fax to IEP a description of all QF generation and
the zip code of each project so that they can begin lobbying specific
legislators.  A significant PR push is planned.

SBX 47 is opposed by SCE.  PG&E's position appears more ambivalent.  One
angle would be to try to get PG&E to support Enron's swap/SC language and
make inclusion of such language a condition of PG&E's support.

GAC


Hey....I am sad...we will not come home until Christmas Day.  Will you back
after that?  I would love to spend some time with you!

How is Houston?  I know you liked it there before but had grown to love the
west.  Are you looking anywhere special for a job?...like Memphis?

Have you heard from any one who worked in the World Trade Center?  Of course,
I thought immediately of visiting your workplace there.  It was unbelievably
horrible!

Talk to you soon....I am so glad we are e-mailing!

Love ya,

Yonnie


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:11 AM ---------------------------
From: Stephen H Douglas on 11/27/2000 08:03 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

John Swafford spoke with David Vander in Wes' group last Tuesday and informed
him that, after reviewing matters, the Corp. State and Local Group had
reduced the charge to ENA from $821,000 to $321,000.  This reduction goes far
to bringing costs in line with those from last year and, the remainder of the
increase, relates to the expansion of support at Corp. related to the
expansion of ENA's business.  Best regards.  Steve.

David W Delainey
11/22/2000 03:05 PM
To: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

Steve, what is the status?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
03:05 PM ---------------------------
From: Stephen H Douglas on 11/13/2000 08:30 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

I spoke with Bob Hermann this afternoon and, in short, the single biggest
contributor to the increase in the corporate tax allocation relates to the
expansion of state and local tax support being provided to our new "business
verticals" - that is, Enron Global Markets, Enron Industrial Markets and
Enron Net Works - which expense should be specifically allocated to such
groups rather than ENA, as is currently the case.  I will follow up with you
regarding the revised number after I have resolved the allocation issue.
Best regards.  Steve.

David W Delainey
11/10/2000 12:53 PM
To: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2001 Plan

Guys, I noticed that the corporate tax allocation to ENA has more than
doubled from 2000 forecast to 2001 plan ie) $1,600,000 from $700,000.  Could
you please explain.  Our goal which is being met in ENA's direct expense
groups is to remain flat year or year from 2000 to 2001.

Regards
Delainey


Morgan,

Heard through Bugg your in SF now. You should rethink coming up to Kelowna
for May long.

Thinking of going to the bay area to visit some friends sometime soon. Send
me your number and I'll give you a call.

Any good stock ideas? Check out MSIA on the Nasdaq OTC board. This could be a
Qualcomm.

Gotta hop,

Chris Dorland
403-974-6910


newel (NOO-el, NYOO-) noun

   1. A center column that supports the steps of a spiral staircase.

   2. A post supporting the handrail of a staircase.

[Middle English nowel, from Middle French nouel, kernel, from Late Latin
nucalis, nutlike, from Latin nuc-, nux nut.]

   "Midway through the stair project he appeared with a solid pine stair
   newel, stripped and sanded."
   Mary Meier, A Millworker's House Remade, The Boston Globe, Feb 24, 2000.

This week's theme: words to describe odds and ends.

............................................................................
When we see men of a contrary character, we should turn inwards and examine
ourselves. -Confucius (551-479 BC)

Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, "Language is a city to the building of which
every human being brought a stone." Invite your friends and family to join
in the quest by sending a gift subscription of A.Word.A.Day. It is free!
http://wordsmith.org/awad/gift.html

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/newel.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/newel.ram


READ VERY CAREFULLY

The application below  (Migrate Me Button)  MUST be clicked between 10:00 AM and 11:00 AM on the DAYof your migration.
Your Migration Date is: April 9th
Please make sure you are connected to the network before you launch this application.
CLICK THE BUTTON ONLY ONCE!

IF A POP-UP BOX APPEARS, PROMPTING YOU TO "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"  PLEASE SELECT TRUST SIGNER.  THIS BOX MAY APPEAR MULTIPLE TIMES.  PLEASE SELECT TRUST SIGNER FOR EVERY INSTANCE.

Please Note:  You will not notice any change to your existing Personal Address Book, Journal entries,  Private Folder Structure or calendar after running this application. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal entries or calendar after you process this tool will need to be manually imported into Outlook after you are migrated.
  Failure to run this application will result in your data not being imported to Outlook.

Thank you for your cooperation,

Outlook 2000 Migration Team


Sara, sorry I am clearly loosing it already.  My meeting is not until
tomorrow.  So, 10:00 is fine.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, Suite 3842
Houston, Texas 77002
Tele. (713) 345-8347
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  angela.davis@enron.com


Norv Turner Fired   From the article:
http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/ce/multi/0,1329,3141082_59,00.html   Washington
Redskins coach Norv Turner was fired Monday after failing to live up to
Super Bowl expectations with the most expensive team in NFL history.  Turner
was dismissed by owner Dan Snyder one day after a 9-7 loss to the New York
Giants. It was the fourth loss in five games for the Redskins (7-6) and
third in a row at home, and it moved a team with championship aspirations
precariously close to elimination from the playoff race.
Passing game coordinator Terry Robiskie was named interim coach. He
immediately began holding team meetings for Sunday's game in Dallas.
Turner fought back tears as he said goodbye.
"I've obviously been put in a good position to have an opportunity to win,"
Turner said. "This team has a chance to be 10-6. That's a disappointment to
me. There's part of me that would like to be a part of it. There's part of
me that understands why it's necessary to make a change right now."
Turner, 48, earned a reputation as a master strategist with the Dallas
Cowboys, where he was the offensive coordinator for two Super Bowl teams in
the early 1990s. Some of his game plans in Washington were truly masterful,
but his lack of communication skills and inability to keep players focused
and motivated led to his downfall.
Injuries also slowed the offense. Three starters were lost for the season
and several others played hurt.
The reconstituted offensive line had its worst day Sunday. However, there
were also many unforced errors such as dropped balls, missed blocks and bad
snaps.
Robiskie, 46, becomes the NFL's third black head coach. He is a former
offensive coordinator with the Oakland Raiders and was one of Turner's first
hires in Washington in 1994. He is known for a tough-love coaching style
from his dealings with temperamental Redskins receivers Michael Westbrook
and Albert Connell.
"He might add a little more fire to it," Connell said.
The Redskins also announced Franklin Pepper Rodgers would become vice
president of football operations and tight ends coach Pat Flaherty would
replace LeCharls McDaniel as special teams coach.
Rodgers, a former head coach at Kansas, UCLA and Georgia Tech and at Memphis
of the USFL, will head the team's selection process for a new head coach in
2001.
//////////

My View:  If I'm Turner, I'm happy to be out from under Danny Snyder.
That's all I have to say about that.  From a FF perspective, I wouldn't be
surprised to see the team show an uptick in intensity behind Robiskie.  We
saw it in Arizona and Cincinnati but the difference here will the be the
Redskins have the talent to turn that enthusiasm into productivity on the
field.  In other news, it looks like QB Jeff George gets another start this
weekend after replacing Brad Johnson.  Turner had been Johnson's protecting
saint so the QB move coinciding with the coaching change is not surprising.

See you tonight in our upgrades and downgrades.

Joe

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


Hi Steve,

Good to hear from you.

Your right, my job is completely different.  Funny how things evolve like
that.  I love it, though.  Very few hurt/sick/deceased folks.

Paige is finishing her junior year at Southwestern, and Michael is in
kindergarten at St Francis.  We are very blessed.

Hope all is well with your family.

Kay


Ok.  When are you available to discuss how to deal with the various issues we
need to address to get this wrapped up?

Thanks,

Kay

"PAUL PIPITONE" <PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com> on 10/24/2000 06:04:20 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: ABB facility agrement

Kay:  references to WestLB are in only a few places in the GE Contract;
namely, the recitals and sections 3.8(c)(2), 5.1, 6.1, 7.2.4, 30.7 and
30.12.  The references in the recitals, 3.8(c),7.2.4, 30.7 and 30.12 can be
handled fairly easily.  The references in 5.1 and 6.1 deal with pricing
matters and will require a little work once the pricing mechanism is worked
out with GE.  My suggestion would be to not revise the document at this time
and make these changes at the same time we make any other changes arising
from the discussions with GE.  PLease let me know what you think.  Regards,
Paul

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 10/24/00 12:37PM >>>

Thanks.  This is a  very drastic situation, so the draft will be
appreciated.

As I recall you were going to turn another draft of the GE facility
agreement, deleting the WestLB references.  When will this be forthcoming?

Thanks,

Kay

"PAUL PIPITONE" <PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com> on 10/24/2000 08:35:34 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: ABB facility agrement

Peter Thompson is working on it.  We should have a draft Wednesday.
Regards, Paul

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 10/23/00 05:38PM >>>
Paul,

When can we expect a draft of the ABB facility agreement? It is getting
urgent.

Thanks,

Kay


> DELL & ENRON ClickAtHome ORDER CONFIRMATION
>
> Thank you for your Enron ClickAtHome order!  Please read and retain this
> e-mail for your records.  It contains important information relating to
> your order that should be used in any future communications with Dell.
>
> Your Dell customer number is:   12831599
>
> Your order number is:  506026004
>
> Your total "Out of Pocket" amount:  $1384.35
> The total "Out of Pocket" amount includes upgrade costs, shipping and
> taxes.
>
>
> Your Online Sales Point of Contact:
> We are here to assist you with your order if needed. Our office hours are
> Monday- Friday, 8am-7pm Central Standard Time.  You can reach our office
> by calling 1-866-220-3355 or through e-mail at:
> US_EPP_Clickathome@dell.com .
>
> Estimated Ship Date:
> We estimate that your order should be shipped on or before 01/31/01.
> Although we do not anticipate a delay in your order, we cannot guarantee
> the shipping date as we occasionally run into unexpected delays in
> manufacturing.  Your order is being shipped to you under Dell's terms and
> conditions of sale found at: www.dell.com.
>
> Total Satisfaction Policy:
> If you wish to cancel your order for any reason within 30 days, we'll
> refund amounts paid by you, minus shipping costs, no questions asked.  You
> are responsible for the cost of shipping your system back to us.
> EPP Customer Care contact options: 1-866-220-3355,  option 4 or use the
> e-mail box  US Relationship EPP@dell.com .
>
> How to Check Order Status:
> If you would like to check the status of your order, please call Dell's
> automated order status inquiry system at:  1-800-433-9014, or visit Dell's
> Order Status Page at: http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp.
>
> You can also register to have Dell e-mail you when your order is shipped,
> by going to: http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/watchreg.asp?ordnum.
>
> How to reach a Technical Support Representative:
> Once you have received your equipment, if you need to contact a Dell
> technical support representative, please call 1-866-220-3355, option 3.
> You will be asked to give your "Service Tag Number".  The "Service Tag
> Number" is a five digit alphanumeric number written on the white bar code
> label on the back of the system.  Please have this number ready before you
> contact the technical support representative.
>
>
> Thank you for participating in the Dell/ Enron ClickAtHome program.  It is
> my pleasure to work with you.
>
> Sincerely,
> Michelle Dorsett
> EPP On-Line
> Dell Computer Corporation
> <mailto:michelle_dorsett@dell.com>
> 1.877.692.2638 X 49794
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Joe Hartsoe, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
            Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: March 23, 2001

RE: REVISED March 28th Power Marketing Conference Call

This week's Power Marketers Working Group conference call will be held on
Wednesday, March 28th, at 2:00 p.m. (EST).  To access the call, dial
1-800-937-6563.  Ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA Call.  We inadvertently deleted
the FERC agenda items from the agenda forwarded earlier, so a revised agenda
is outlined below.

March 28, 2001 Conference Call REVISED Agenda

? FERC Agenda Items
   ? Grid Florida RTO
   ? SPP/Energy/NSP-New Century RTO
   ? ISO-NE May 8th Prices
   ? New York Market Mitigation/Bid Caps
   ? New York ICAP

? California
   ? Updates
   ? EPSA Draft Filing on Removing Obstacles
      ? To be forwarded
   ? EPSA Response to Refund Orders
   ? Legislative Responses

? New York
   ? EPSA Draft Filing on Market Interventions/Mitigation
         ? To be forwarded

? MISO/Alliance
   ? Alliance RTO Meeting Report
      ? Interconnection Procedures
   ? Settlement Update

? Conference Call Administration

? Washington Regulatory Staff Meeting
   ? Thursday, March 29th, noon


you were on the original.  did you not get it?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/27/2000 10:51 AM -----

	MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com>
	12/27/2000 01:24 AM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, Alan.Comnes@enron.com, dbenevid@enron.com,
eletke@enron.com, George.McClellan@enron.com, Harry.Kingerski@enron.com,
James.D.Steffes@enron.com, jrudolp@enron.com, Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com,
Kevin.McGowan@enron.com, Lisa.Yoho@enron.com, Lysa.Akin@enron.com,
Mary.Hain@enron.com, Paul.Kaufman@enron.com, Richard.Shapiro@enron.com,
ryang@enron.com, Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com, Sarah.Novosel@enron.com,
sstoness@enron.com, skean@enron.com, Stuart.Staley@enron.com,
Susan.J.Mara@enron.com, vsharp@enron.com, wcurry@enron.com, MBD
<MDay@GMSSR.com>, Robert.C.Williams@enron.com, msmith1@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal Issues to be Presented at CPUC Emergency Hearings

Enclosed is a draft presentation of legal issues to be presented at the CPUC
emergency hearings in conjunction with regulatory and economic arguments set
forth in the draft comments previously distributed by Jeff Dasovich.  Jeff
and I will work to merge the legal issues into the full presentation,
subject to the duscussion on the conference call tomorrow morning.  This
presentation has been prepared in anticipation of the fact that we will
likely be limited to a very short verbal presentation tomorrow.  A more
extensive legal analysis of all these points is being prepared to accompany
any briefs or written comments which we are permitted to file later.  Please
e-mail comments using the reply function to MBD at this address before the
conference call if at all possible.  Thank you.  Mike Day

 <<X19418.DOC>>


Reminder - Please give your updates to Dina as soon as you can.

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com


please do an assignment.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Melodick, Kim
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle; Palmer, Lizzette
Cc:	Sweet, Twanda
Subject:	contract assignment for John Suarez

John Suarez  (Dir. Trading) has recently transferred from EBS to East Power Trading  effective Nov 1, 2001 and we need to have his employment agreement amended to reflect his new op co.  What details do you need from me?


Hi Vince,

Thanks for replying to my email.  The scheduled interview with Howard will go
ahead tomorrow, I have written to Shirley to request a convenient time for
you and we will arrange for Howard to come back in for a Video Conference
with you.

Regards Rachel

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
16/02/2001 23:42
To: Rachel Quirke/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Tuesday interview

Rachel,

I would like very much to interview Howard but I am in
Philadelphia on Tuesday.

Vince


Please see below the latest edition of GlobalFlash!  Apologies for the delay.

Regards,

Tracy
---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ralston/EU/Enron on 29/11/2000
16:45 ---------------------------

	From:  Enron Europe General Announcement @ ECT
24/11/2000 09:40

Please respond to Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT
To: ECT Asia Pacific, ECT Europe
cc:

Subject: Newsletter: GlobalFlash!

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Nordic energy agreement with UPM-Kymmene
Enron Nordic Energy and UPM-Kymmene Corp. have signed a two-year portfolio
management agreement covering UPM Kymmene's Nordic power portfolio. The
Mid-Market desk in the Oslo office will assist UPM in optimising its
portfolio of approximately 14 TWh. energydesk.com will provide UPM with the
risk management system used in the process. In addition, the agreement opens
the door for Enron Energy Services to explore a variety of opportunities
within the company. The Nordic agreement is the first step towards a broader
scope of co-operation with UPM on a European and Global basis. The total
contract value is estimated to be $375 million.

UPM-Kymmene's nominal electricity resources total about 3000 MW, of which
2500 MW in Finland and about 500 MW in other countries. The group's power
procurement totals approximately 18 TWh per year, of which about 14 TWh in
Finland. Around 15 TWh/a is consumed by the group's own mills and the rest is
sold to the market.

http://www.upm-kymmene.com
http://www.upm-kymmene.com/upm/energy/energybuild.html

The deal was led by Sami Tenngren - Nordic Mid-Market, and was supported by
Magnus Groth - EES, Jukka Hormaluoma - energydesk.com, and Martin Rosell -
Legal.

Congratulations on a job well done to all those who worked so hard to put
this transaction into place........Thor Lien.

Australia
Despite heavy flooding in NSW, the weather is looking up for Enron
Australia.  Last week, the Sydney Office launched online Hong Kong weather
derivatives  and the Sydney weather node traded on EnronOnline in the US time
zone.  With this precedent, we hope to support the takeoff of global weather
on EnronOnline.

The Coal Group in Sydney has suddenly become very popular. There is no doubt
that a recent sale to AES for the plant at Barbers Point, Hawaii is the real
reason.  Coal purchases during year 2000 have been concluded with most major
producers in Indonesia and Australia.  We will soon be loading our first
shipment from China. Deliveries to Nippon Steel in Japan are underway. Also,
a shipment to a large power utility in Japan will take place in early 2001.

Off-shore wind plans
Enron has entered into agreement to purchase the development assets of a 30
MW offshore wind project in the UK.  The Harwich project, situated in
Gunfleet Sands approximately eight kilometres offshore in the North Thames
Estuary is believed to represent one of the first serious investments in the
development of offshore wind energy in the UK.

Weekly EnronOnline Figures
Below are the latest figures for EnronOnline as of November 20, 2000.

* Total Life to Date Transactions >  450,000
* Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $253 billion

SAP SYNCHRONISATION AND ALLOCATION PROJECT

Recently we updated you on the SAP Synchronisation and Allocation project.
The changes being made are designed to assist business units in tracking and
controlling costs.

What's changing?

New Project Codes:

We will be moving from the current project tracking mechanism, Internal
Orders (I/O), to using WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) .   These new codes
facilitate better project reporting and are grouped hierarchically into
structures. These groupings are based on project organisation, phasing or
activities and provides a project overview.  The PS Module within SAP
provides for a common template offering some key advantages:

 -  provides consistency across projects and business units
 -  facilitates comparison between projects
 -  provides a logical grouping of code structures

This tracking mechanism will also be used for capital projects or expense
projects that require cost tracking.

What about training?

To ensure your comfort with the changes listed above, training materials are
currently under development by the project team.  Core training is scheduled
to be December 4 - December 22 and training notifications will be sent
shortly to those users who are affected by these changes.  These
notifications will come via an email from European T&D and will enable you to
register for available classes.

ENRON IN THE PRESS
"The name of Enron may be unfamiliar in Japan, but it should not stay that
way for long.........Joseph Hirl, president of Enron Japan, says: "We don't
go in and try to destroy markets - we go in and create them."  Some of the
company's potential customers and business partners may still need to be
persuaded of that, but Enron has a large stock of experience to reassure
them".   Financial Times

EUROPE TRIUMPHS AT THE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
We are pleased to report a great showing by Enron Europe people in the
various competitions organised as part of this year's Enron Management
Conference in San Antonio:

Golf:        Brian Stanley was a member of the winning team
Tennis:  Rob Saltiel won and Steve Elliott was runner up.
Road Rally: Jackie Gentle's team was third.  [We beat Ken Rice in his Ferrari
and we stopped for ice-cream.  Hee! Hee! ....Ed.]
Road Rally:         Eric Shaw & Riccardo Bortolotti won the fastest rental
car in the slalom section.

Everyone is strangely silent on who won (or lost) the after dinner poker game
...........

NEW STARTERS
Please join us in extending a warm welcome to this week's new members of
staff:

Andrew Davison (Global Finance), Nick Arnold (Power Trading UK), Steven Los
(Transaction Support), Melanie Shuckard (Coal Trading), Mark Sheey (Fin Ops
Fin Rptg), Toni Duff (Enron Broadband Trading), Marc Hammerson (Legal), Jose
Leitao (EES Middle Market), Mustafa Hussein (Govt & Regulatory Affairs),
Brenda Van de Peer (Global Operations), Lorna Hyde (HR A&A), Jacob Meins
(European Gas Trading), Mark Leahy (EnronCredit.com)

TELEPHONY UPDATE
The European Telephony Group have added a new facility to the Enron House
Telephone System, which will give staff using mobile phones the ability to
have their conversations recorded.  This is primarily aimed at Traders who
may need confirmation of a conversation for a transaction, which is not made
from an Enron House phone.  To use the facility out users should dial 37373
from their Enron Mobile, at the sound of the dialtone they should dial as if
they would for any call from inside Enron House -- i.e. dial '9' and the
relevant number to talk to the client.  The Telephony Group can retrieve the
conversation on demand and replay to the trader.

UPDATE FROM AYSCOUGH TRAVEL
Please be advised, should you miss one leg of your journey and have onward
flight connections there is a strong possibility the airline will cancel the
reservations, if they have not been advised accordingly.  Airlines are
constantly monitoring for passengers who fail to make their reservation or
who hold multiple bookings on similar routings. In order to increase their
passenger revenue they will delete duplicate or onward bookings and sell the
seats at a higher fare.  Please advise the Implant Office of any amendments
to your travel arrangements as soon as they are available. This is imperative
if your changes arise during your business trip.  Ayscough Travel thanks you
in advance for your assistance!

CORRECTION: CHAIRMAN'S AWARD
We would like to make an apology to all the employees who were incorrectly
listed as London based staff in last week's GlobalFlash.  Please see below
for the correct listings:

Paul Bates - Teesside
Paula Bowman - Teesside
John Brodie - Teesside
Peter Burke - Teesside
Terry Bye - Teesside
Sue Caswell - Teesside
Eric Chamberlain - Teesside
Graham Taylor - Teesside
Caroline Cunliffe - Teesside	Sarah Grimes - Teesside
	Tim Roy  - Teesside
	Terry Waldron  - Teesside
	Trevor High - Teesside
	Christine Hill - Teesside
	Mike Mason  - Teesside
	Geoff Milward - Teesside
	Richard Murray - Teesside
	Mike Mussett - Teesside	Colin Telfer - Teesside
		Dave Shaw  - Teesside
		Kevin Westwood  - Teesside
		Judith Wong - Teesside
		Gary Douthwaite - Teesside
		Paul Frankland - Teesside
		Hans-Mart Groen - Amsterdam
		Jose Luis Novo - Madrid

AMERIFLASH BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Coal Trading
The liquidity in trading of the Standard European Coal Agreement has
increased significantly over the last 6 weeks.  Many counterparties that
previously opted to stay on the sidelines finally chose to join the game.
Since the contract's inception at the beginning of the year, Enron has traded
a total of 5.3 million tons against the SECA contract, of which 3.8 million
tons has been traded via EnronOnline since July 2000.  We are 5.3 million
tons of a total traded market of 5.8 million tons.

Principal Investments
Tridium Inc., the leading provider of Internet-based automation
infrastructure solutions, announced the close of a $20 million round of
capital funding. The funds will be used to increase Tridium,s sales and
technical support offices in North America, expand its operations into Europe
and Asia, and enhance its technology and products. kRoad Ventures, L.P. and
Enron North America each contributed $10 million in venture capital.

Corporate Development
Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allegheny
Energy, Inc., announced the signing of a definitive agreement under which
Allegheny Energy Supply will purchase three Enron natural gas-fired merchant
generating facilities. The acquisition is expected to close in the 2nd
quarter of 2001.


Tana-

I see that ENA is a contemplated counterparty for Japanese weather
derivatives.  There are both legal and tax issues that require
consideration.

I am unsure if Susan Musch has had the opportunity to review the tax issues,
therefore I have copied her on this note.

With regard to Japanese legal issues, there are certain matters that must be
dealt with in the GTCs, if entering into transactions between ENA and
Japanese counterparties are being considered, including issues of an
underlying legitimate business purpose to avoid gambling restrictions etc.

Please inform me with whom I should be in contact to ensure that these issues
are appropriately handled.

Thanks,

John

	Tana Jones@ECT
	09/08/2000 10:52 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Profile additions

Please note new products.  Let me know if you have any issues or concerns
with any of these.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 10:52 AM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	09/08/2000 10:40 AM

		 To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Profile additions

Please see the attached spreadsheet with new additions in blue.  A couple of
Enron entity names changes (Enron Australia Finance Pty limited to Enron
Japan Corp.)  Also note that Sea Freight Fin Swap BCI 4 and Sea Freight Fin
Swap BCI 7 have been renamed from previous UK prefix.  Please let me know if
you have any questions.  Please begin using the attached spreadsheet on
Monday, Sept. 11.

Thanks,
Stephanie


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 09/28/99 01:25
PM ---------------------------

"Kathy Seaman" <KSeaman@eei.org> on 09/22/99 04:39:36 PM
Please respond to "Wholesale Electric Contract Standardization Group"
<contract@ls.eei.org>
To: "Wholesale Electric Contract Standardization Group" <contract@ls.eei.org>
cc:  (bcc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Information on Standardized Master Power Contract

EEI and the EEI Alliance of Energy Suppliers will sponsor a special workshop
on November 17 in Washington, D.C. to address the wholesale trading market
and Standardized Master Power Contract.

Attached is a PDF file of the Workshop brochure.  You must have an Acrobat
reader to open it.  If you do not, you may go to http://www.adobe.com to
download a gratis version.  If you would prefer, you may contact Trish
Higgins, the Alliance Coordinator, and she will be pleased to fax a copy to
your office:  thiggins@eei.org/202-508-5180.  For your information, you will
also receive a copy via mail.   As shown on the the PDF file, but not the
printed brochure, Harlan Murphy of Dynegy Power Marketing Inc., will
participate on the panel "Can the Standardized Contract Assist the Market?"

 - Pwrmkt2.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
09:52 AM ---------------------------

Tanya Tamarchenko
02/28/2001 01:17 PM
To: Wenyao Jia/HOU/ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: "analytical" var implementation in RisktRAC

Debbie,
I am forwarding to you a 2 page document describing implementation of
"analytical" VAR in RisktRAC.

Here is why this effort is very important:
1. We need to calculate VAR for other percentile but 5 (1% or even 0.2% as
mentioned by Rick Buy)
and our simulation model can not handle required number of simulations;
2. We need to present additional risk measures (such as Mean Tail Loss) to
the Board.

The analytical approach is implemented in a spreadsheet and fully tested
already so there will be no problems
with the algorithm itself.

We need to get together and discuss IT implementation.

What do you think?

Tanya


Any chance you're attending again this year?  It would be nice to catch up.


Hi Susie!

Could you email me your father's full name?  We are trying to get the final
list
together.

Thanks,
Lisa


Tammy, please ensure that budgets and cost tracking similar to the
peakers/Doyle are set up ASAP for Austin and Vitro.  These should be updated
and circulated weely.

Regards
Delainey


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011720.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Good Afternoon Analysts,

Were you unable to attend the Rice MBA Info Session?

Or, would you like more information?

Please visit EB3526A for brochures, applications and other information regarding the Monday, November 5, 2001, Rice MBA Info Session.

Date: 	 	Monday, November 5, 2001

Time:  		6:00 - 8:00 pm

Location:  	ECN 5c2

If we may offer any additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us
@ x3-5614.

Thanks.

-Constance Charles
Human Resources
Analyst & Associate Program


We have received an executed copy of the Non-Disclosure Agreement between
Analytica, Inc. and Enron Net Works, LLC and EnronOnline, LLC.  A copy will
be sent to Dave Samuels and Kal Shah.


All:

I received a draft master agreement from MSCS for proposed execution with
Enron North America Corp.  Are any of you trying to push execution of this
agreement?  Have either of Enron Credit, Inc. or Enron Credit Limited been
speaking with MSCS about this?

Please advise.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com