Calif. power resources will be 3,752 Mw short in 2001

By David Feliciano, BridgeNews

Scottsdale, Ariz.--Dec. 7--California resources and reserves for
electricity will be 3,752 megawatts short of the anticipated load in 2001,
California Independent System Operator (ISO) President and CEO Terry Winter
said Thursday at the annual Western Systems Coordinating Council meeting.

"I'm concerned about supply," Winter said.

"Without sufficient supply, markets will set socially and politically
unacceptable price levels (for wholesale power)"

Winter said California power resources will total 46,679 Mw in 2001, but
load is expected to reach well over 50,000 Mw. Over 17,000 Mw of new
generation
is planned for the state, but most new power plants are not expected to begin
service until 2002 and beyond.

Not helping California's cause, Winter said, are reduced imports of power
this year from neighboring states, down from 7,500 Mw in November of 1999 to
3,900 Mw this November.

Winter also pointed to the affect of a soaring natural gas market. "You can
build generation, but in California, natural gas and emissions are the next
problems. Natural gas is running into the same problem electricity has...there
is a shortage."

Due in part to the above California wholesale power prices have skyrocketed
since May, leading to rolling blackouts in San Francisco in June and a series
of conservation emergencies since that time. The state has been under a power
conservation warning much of this week.

As tools to solve California power woes, Winter suggested the ISO file for
an extension of price cap authority for power until markets are demonstrated
to
be workably competitive. The ISO's authority to set price caps, which
currently
stands at $250 per Mw/hour expired Nov. 15. The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission on Nov. 1 proposed caps of $150 Mw/hour, but has yet to officially
rule on the matter.

Winter also called for the California Public Utilities Commission to allow
full peak requirements to be forward contracted and hedged by load.  End

*********************************
California ISO Files Emergency Action With FERC to Deal With Electricity
Supply Crisis

FOLSOM, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 8, 2000 via NewsEdge Corporation  -
While grappling
with another Stage Two Emergency today, the California Independent
System Operator (California ISO) is taking swift action to deal with a
critical shortage of bids in the ISO market as well as serious
underscheduling of electricity in the forward markets. The proposed
market changes create the incentive to sell power in existing markets
and allow the ISO to compete better for regional energy, which is in
short supply throughout the western United States.

This afternoon, the ISO filed an emergency tariff Amendment 33
filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Commencing at 3:00 p.m. today Friday, December 8, 2000, the California
ISO will implement a $250 "soft cap" on the ISO's Real-Time Energy
Market similar to that proposed by FERC in its November 1 Order
Proposing Remedies for California Wholesale Electric Markets (93 FERC
61,121).

Analogous to the soft cap proposed by FERC, Energy bids prices in
excess of $250/MWh will no longer be rejected by the ISO's
computerized scheduling system but, instead, will be evaluated in
price merit order. The California ISO has recently been placed in the
position of having to negotiate prices for power in real-time and is
finding it increasingly difficult to manage these negotiations while
at the same time balancing supply and demand; causing significant risk
to the California ISO's ability to maintain reliable control of the
power grid. The ISO will no longer negotiate prices in real-time. To
the extent the ISO issues dispatch instructions to Scheduling
Coordinators (market participants) for energy bid prices in excess of
the $250 soft cap, then settlement will be as-bid, subject to refund,
if the costs cannot be verified. Market participants will be required
to submit cost documentation to the FERC, with informational filings
to the ISO and the state, supporting any Energy payments priced in
excess of the soft cap.

The current $250 price cap in Ancillary Service capacity bids is
unaffected. Also, the market clearing prices for Ancillary Services
and Imbalance Energy will continue to be calculated and posted up to
the $250 soft cap.

Amendment 33 proposes three key elements:

1. Implement a "soft cap" of $250/MWh for Imbalance Energy. This
soft cap would limit market clearing prices to $250/MWh, but would
allow market participants to submit bids over $250 if they submit
verifiable costs.

2. Allocate the costs for energy purchases above the soft cap to
Scheduling Coordinators who rely on the ISO's real-time energy
purchases to meet their loads, rather than buying their own supplies
in the forward markets; and

3. Impose penalties on Participating Generators that fail to
comply with ISO dispatch instructions. Amendment 33 is posted on the
ISO's website at www.caiso.com under FERC FILINGS on the home page.

The ISO has seen a dramatic increase in costs for the power it
buys in real time. For the first five days of December we averaged
approximately $5 million per day. However, on December 5th we paid $36
million, December 7th $81 million. Failure to take action now would
have the local utilities and ultimately their customers continue to
face these extraordinary costs.

The California ISO is charged with managing the flow of
electricity along the long-distance, high-voltage power lines that
make up the bulk of California's transmission system. The
not-for-profit public-benefit corporation assumed the responsibility
in March, 1998, when California opened its energy markets to
competition and the state's investor-owned utilities turned their
private transmission power lines over to the California ISO to manage.
The mission of the California ISO is to safeguard the reliable
delivery of electricity, facilitate markets and ensure equal access to
a 12,500 circuit mile "electron highway."

***********************************
Federal Agencies Gear Up Hydro System to Meet Demand

PORTLAND, Ore., Dec. 8 /PRNewswire/  via NewsEdge Corporation  -
Due to an impending power shortage,
federal agencies will increase generation at nearly all of the federal dams.
This may cause some projects to operate outside the limits of the biological
opinion under the Endangered Species Act as additional water is released for
generation from upstream reservoirs, the Bonneville Power Administration said
today.

The announcement came following a call by the Regional Emergency Response
Team and Northwest governors for conservation of electricity when arctic air
invades the Northwest beginning this weekend. The team comprises Northwest
utilities, the Northwest Power Planning Council and representatives of the
four Northwest states.

BPA officials said that this step must be taken in order to ensure that
heavy demand for electricity can be met in the region through next week.
Forecasters are predicting freezing temperatures on both sides of the
Cascades. BPA supplies about 40 percent of the region's electricity, most of
it generated at dams in the Columbia River Basin.

"Utilities in the region have assessed their generating inventories and
determined that the region is clearly short of energy and in an emergency
status," Delwiche said. "The BPA and other utilities must take extraordinary
steps immediately to avoid potentially severe shortages next week."

Water is stored in reservoirs behind upstream dams and released in the
spring to assist downstream migration of juvenile salmon. BPA manages the
storage to ensure that enough water is available to both meet electrical
generating requirements and flows for salmon. BPA has the authority to exceed
guidelines of the biological opinion under emergency conditions.

"It is very important that everyone - residential and commercial consumers
and industries -- do what they can to cut back on their use of electricity
during this cold snap," said Greg Delwiche, BPA's vice president for
generation supply. "Every kilowatt hour saved now means less need to draw
water from the reservoirs."

SOURCE  Bonneville Power Administration

CONTACT:  Ed Mosey, Bonneville Power Administration, 503-230-5359
Web site:  http://www.bpa.gov

****************************
Calif. Restarts Dirty Power Plants

By JENNIFER COLEMAN
Associated Press Writer
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) via NewsEdge Corporation  -
Hoping to ease the state's electricity
crisis, air-quality regulators Friday allowed the restart of
several power plants in Southern California that had been shut down
because they had reached air pollution limits.

The move came a day after California encountered an
unprecedented power crunch, with electricity supplies for the
state's 34 million people so perilously low that California only
narrowly avoided blackouts.

The power crunch has been blamed on cold weather in the
Northwest, the shutdown of some generating plants for repairs or
other reasons, and the effects of utility deregulation in
California.

On Thursday, during the emergency, power plants capable of
producing 2,400 megawatts were off-line because they had exceeded
their pollution limits. One megawatt is sufficient to power about
1,000 homes.

On Friday, the South Coast Air Quality Management District
agreed to let some of those polluting power plants return to
operation and restore about half of that lost generating capacity.
However, those plants will have to pay daily fines.

Restarting the over-polluting plants should provide a cushion
for state, said Stephanie McCorkle, a spokeswoman for the
California Independent System Operator, which runs the state's
power grid.

In addition, hundreds of companies voluntarily cut consumption
Friday to avoid imposed outages.

``We're still encouraging conservation efforts,'' said Lori
O'Donley, spokeswoman for the ISO. ``We're optimistic that we won't
have to'' impose shutdowns on commercial customers.

Federal energy regulators are working with the state to find
power that can be diverted to California during the crunch, moves
that could include increasing hydroelectric generation out of
state.

The power grid's managers were able to avoid blackouts Thursday
by shutting down the enormous state and federal pumps that push
water from Northern California to central and southern regions.

The phased-in deregulation of California's $20 billion
electrical power industry was supposed to lower prices by creating
greater competition. But demand for electricity has outstripped
supply, in part because of a growing population and a booming
high-tech economy.

Electricity is also in short supply because energy companies
held off building new power plants while deregulation was in the
planning stages. In addition, deregulation has forced utilities to
sell off their power-generating assets, such as dams and plants,
and import electricity from neighboring states, where power demand
is high right now because of a cold snap.


Looks like Mark already changed this to 3/28 to 3/31 - looks good to me.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/26/2001 02:07 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb check out

561213

broker has the term the 28-31

thanks


A VIRUS IS BEING CIRCULATED WITH THE TITLE "FD  JOKE".? DO NOT OPEN SUCH A
MESSAGE IF YOU SHOULD RECEIVE  IT.


I will be taking my discretionary holiday on Thursday, Jan. 10.  Be back in the office on Friday.
slb


Mat,

Is this business or vacation?  I thought business but I want to make sure so I know how to put it on the calendar.

-Ina
-----Original Message-----
From: Sandra Delgado [mailto:sdelgado_vitoltvl@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 4:59 PM
To: IRANGEL@ENRON.COM
Subject: 18OCT HOUSTON TO PORTLAND = MATHEW SMITH = TICKETED

                                          AGENT JS/SS BOOKING REF
YCWSX2

                                          SMITH/MATHEW D

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  ATTN-INA RANGEL X37257

  DATE:  OCT 12 2001                   ENRON

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  18OCT HOUSTON TX     PORTLAND OR    1145A   210P
CO 478     Y          THU   G.BUSH INTERCO PORTLAND INTL
                            TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         4:25 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
                            SEAT 06D NO SMOKING CONFIRMED SMITH/MATHEW
D

CAR                   18OCT BUDGET                 PORTLAND OR
                      24OCT CONFIRMATION: 03844558US4
                            TELEPHONE: 503-249-4556
                            FULL 4-DOOR CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD166.99WK UNL .00MI 6DY BASE RATE
                            166.99 UNL
                            RATE GUARANTEED
                            PICK-UP: PORTLAND INTL AIRPORT, PORTLAND OR
                            DROP-OFF: PORTLAND INTL AIRPORT, PORTLAND
OR
                            ZD000003228

HOTEL                 21OCT HOTEL VINTAGE PLAZA
                      24OCT 422 S.W. BROADWAY
                            PORTLAND, OR 97205
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 503 228 1212
                            FAX: 503 228 3598
                            TELEX: TLX NONE
                            CONFIRMATION: 1090489164
                            REFERENCE: A04A1Y
                            SINGLE ROOM KING SIZE BED
                            RATE: THR USD 117.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            RQST NS KING
         *24* HOUR ADVANCE XCL POLICY AT THE HOTEL VINTAGE PLAZA

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  24OCT PORTLAND OR    HOUSTON TX     300P    905P
CO 128     Y          WED   PORTLAND INTL  G.BUSH INTERCO
                                           TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         4:05 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
                            SEAT 14F NO SMOKING CONFIRMED SMITH/MATHEW
D

      AIR FARE 1834.42      TAX 147.58          TOTAL USD
1982.00
                                            AIR TOTAL USD
1982.00

                                        INVOICE TOTAL USD
1982.00

PAYMENT: CCCA5424180314178838/0104/A803494

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/UJ106D

SMITH/MATHEW D                           TICKET:CO/ETKT 005 7035060324

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COEG235566
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

=====
Vitol Travel Services
713 FARGO AVE.
HOUSTON, TX 77006

713-526-0633 NEW NUMBER
800 724-7002 24 HOURS

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


Larry, per your request following our phone conversation today I'm forwading
a brief note regarding our dinner meeting last night with the Arizona Chapter
of the Nature Conservancy.

Hank Hull (Flagstaff Team leader) and I met with Edward Smith, the Northern
Arizona Program Ecologist with the Nature Conservancy, here out of
Flagstaff.  The purpose of the meeting was to make introductions between Ed
and Hank and to informally discuss opportunities in which the Flagstaff Team
could support the local chapter.  The Flagstaff Team made a committment in
their Team Objectives and each team member in their Peer Committments to
support the Conservancy in some manner this year.  To date all eight of the
Flagstaff Team members (2 positions currently vacant) have taken advantage of
the free membership offered through ETS.  Also, Ed was quite impressed with
ETS's sponsorship of the employee and family memberships.  I won't get into
the details but, it was obvious that opportunities will exist for the Team to
become active in local activities.  So, as a follow up to the meeting, Ed
will make a list of the areas and locations the Conservancy is in need of
help and forward this list to Hank who will then poll the various Team
members and solicit volunteers.  This may take a couple of weeks to get up
and running but we should be well on our way by June.  Our goal, for now,
will be to committ on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis to providing a
given number of volunteer hours.  I'll keep you posted on how things
progress.

Ed also, offered to come out to one of the Team's meetings and give the group
an overview of the Arizona Chapter of the Nature Conservancy and discuss our
involvement with the entire Team.  And last but not least, when you, Bill,
John, Rich and Randy come out for your West End field trip we may be able to
coordinate a dinner get togeather with Ed to discuss any topics of interest.
Just a thought.....

Have a good week.......


thank you and happy new year!

liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com on 12/29/2000 01:44:23 PM
To: scott.neal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Thank you

Scott,
We now have nearly all of Enron's complete bidweek information, including
those
in the Mid-Continent region. Thank you for your help and I hope you have a
great
holiday weekend.
Liane


Sound is right...I heard him barking this morning again. I guess he was calling out to Indy to see if he could come out to play.
  laura.jewett@bakerbotts.com wrote: It wasn't him, he is home safe and sound.-----Original Message-----
From: zaeza [mailto:zaeza@unplace.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:33 PM
To: emca@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: *EMCA* missing dog

is his dog missing? I had to take that puppy to the spca cause he was an escape artistsomebody told me that a family had taken this dog in for about a week, but it kept getting out and they didn't want the responsibility anymore----- Original Message ----- From: laura.jewett@bakerbotts.com To: emca@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:13 AMSubject: RE: *EMCA* missing dog
That could be "Zorro" - he lives at 904 Bomar - Gary is his dad.  -----Original Message-----
From: zaeza [mailto:  zaeza@unplace.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:02 PM
To: emca@yahoogroups.com
Subject: *EMCA* missing dog

anyone missing or know someone who is missing a young, black male lab-mix?found him wandering around the street today - not very car-wise...NathalieBomar
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

---------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions Great stuff seeking new owners! Bid now!


fyi  Carlos is working on it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2001 12:49
PM ---------------------------

John Moore
04/26/2001 08:04 AM
To: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Naveed Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: This is not a drill!

Kay and Carlos,

We're going to put a very serious and accerated push to secure a site or
sites in the very near future, but obviously we won't get there without a
priority commitment of your time and involvement.  If there are any doubts
regarding the level of committment that we need, I encourage you to visit
with Mitch to reconfirm our priority and urgency.

In summary, we have two quality sites and one less optimized area where we
are going to focus in the near term.  The two quality sites are both subject
to a "bid" process (Texas municipal political subdivision) and the respective
counterparty's board approval,  We have no reason to expect that we wouldn't
be able to secure the sites but it's going to take manpower and about 6 to 8
weeks - this time frame doesn't work for us.  Contemporaneously with working
through the "bid" process for the two sites and in the near term, we're going
to focus on a suitable site area, although not optimized, that will give us
relatively quick site control and allow us to progress the coal initiative.
Our goal is to secure site control for the less optimized site by next
Friday, the 4th of May.

Here's a basic summary of our immediate site options and an action plan:

1.) Less Optimized Site: (not subject to "bid")
 Bruce and I will contact regional land agents today to get a summary of
available sites.  We'll  travel up to the region Monday afternoon to scope
the sites on Tuesday.  We'll present an Option to Purchase offer to the
respective land owner and secure, at a minimum, a Letter of Intent by the 4th
of May.  Transaction needs to be in the name of an SPV.

2.) Gibbons Creek
 This site and PRB fired facility is owned by Texas Municipal Power Agency
(TMPA).  TMPA is comprised of Bryan, Garland, Denton, and Greenville.  Our
intent is to secure a site for a 525 MW PRB fired facility, and enter into a
Shared Services Agreement and O&M Agreement with TMPA.  There is interest on
the part of TMPA and this transaction is in play, however it's going to take
time.  Contemporaneously,  our immediate action is to gain some form site
control on the land.  It has been represented to us that an option to
purchase will be subject to the sealed bid process;  that takes too much
time.  Our interest is to close the option to purchase or some form of site
control within two weeks.  I'm going to contact Carl Shahady, TMPA's
attorney, to see if there is any latitude in the regs requiring a sealed
bid.  You're more than welcome to participate.  (TMPA wants to use a standard
Texas Real Estate Commission (TREC) form, which I have a copy of.)  Perhaps
we can put a month-to-month "option" on the site, which effectively takes the
property off of the market, while we go through the sealed bid process.
Legal questions:  (i) Any land transaction needs to be in the name of an SPV
- which one should we use? (ii) Coal projects don't fit into Turbo Park,
I've exchanged voice messages with BrianK to see what needs to be done here,
any suggestions?

3.) BPUB
 BPUB's Board approved the development LOI this past Monday, so we're ready
to go.  The optimal sites are at the port, and the port is subject to the bid
process.  The intent is to use the same form of option to lease contract as
we used for the TEX/MEX sites at the port.  Again, this site control is going
to take 6 to 8 weeks.  Aaron Roffwarg of B&P drafted the land contracts and
he helped negotiate between John Davidson, BPUB's outside counsel, and Dan
Rentfro, Brownsville Navigation District's outside  counsel.  I'm going to
contact Aaron this morning and get him spun up on the new contracts and have
him call DanR to get him alligned with our objectives.  Your more than
welcome to participate in my call with Aaron, too.  Scott and I are going to
meet with BPUB and with the Port tomorrow to indentify the site and confirm
our course of action

That's the plan.  I'll be calling each of you this morning so that we can all
get on the same page.

Thanks,

JMoore


Mark- here is my response to your request. Call with questions.

Goal:
Total Foreign Exchange Exposure quantified and communicated to BOD.

Performance:
Project completed with final tranche of results reported to Finance Committee
Dec 11. The notional exposure as well as impact on potential impact on
earnings and CTA accounts have been quantified and reported to the BOD over
the past year according to a schedule that has strictly adhered to. Also, a
template and process has been established to be able to easily report changes
in the future. Enron has never had a comprehensive review of FX exposure
prior to this activity. As an aside, there has been a fair amount of hedging
activity resulting from this effort.

Goal:
Establish risk and trading control processes for risks unique to EES.

Performance:
Systems have been established and monitoring controls are in place across
EES. A thorough study of the DSM business has been completed and the results
presented to the Finance Committee. A RAC task force has been put in place
which has established a work plan consisting of 53 elements that EES has
agreed to put in place to get the overall back office and trading and credit
control systems where they need to be. Significant progress has been made
against these recommendations. DSM projects have been spot tested with
outside measurement firm and the results reported to EES. These tests have
highlighted focus areas to determine where the capital dollars are best
employed.

Goal:
Solidify the global risk management policy beyond Houston and London.

Performance:
Complete and Ongoing. During 2000, Project Doorstep was initiated by RAC
which inspected every office within Enron to determine if trading was taking
place and if so whether the Enron controls were being adhered to. A data base
system was developed to routinely prompt surprise inspections of these
offices and also monitor if the recommendations are being adhered to.
Doorstep was a huge effort involving RAC, AA, and operations to really
understand where we have risks. It also helps in defining where we don't have
responsibility such as EOTT,  Azurix  and The New Power Company.


Drew,

Did you already approve this expense report and send it to accounting?

Denise

---------------------- Forwarded by Denise LaGesse/ET&S/Enron on 12/05/2000
10:50 AM ---------------------------

DENISE LAGESSE
11/16/2000 04:04 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Susan's expense report 11/16/00

Please approve the attached expense report and cc: me on your approval.
Thanks!


fyi  - weekly Shankman, Lavorato and desk head reports.

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 05:26
PM ---------------------------

From:  Matt Motsinger
    06/26/2000 03:22 PM

To: Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL vs NON-EOL Lavorato Report 06-23-00

US POWER breakout by REGION

NA GAS breakout by region


Tino called this morning with a quick report.  They are still negotiating
with DOE on a power plant deal, but it looks pretty shaky.  The size of the
plant has grown to 380 MW, for reasons that are unclear to me.  Tino has been
ordered to develop an exit strategy in case the power plant deal falls
apart.  He says Dennis has about $3 mm in the project so far, most of it
related to the pipeline right of way.  The have a binding 20 year agreement
with the tribes for the ROW that calls for a $100,000 minimum monthly
payment.  I'm not sure the entire route is perfected or not or whether the
ROW agreement includes fiber optic rights etc.  The question is whether we
are even interested enough to justify a closer look, since the rights Dennis
has pulled together will probably be available for cents on the dollar.  I
told Tino I'd give him a call next week to let him know.  At minimum, I'd
suggest we have one of our ROW guys take a look at whatever they've got and
advise us on what its worth.  Your thoughts?  DF


Call in information:
800-991-9019 US
847-619-8039 Canada
pass code# 6113873


yes, yes, yes, looking forward to it!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Janet Wallis" <janet@dtahou.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:11 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Hey girl

Are you still available for lunch on  Monday?

Janet Wallis
8118 Waynemer Way
Houston, Texas  77040
(713) 937-0919


-----Original Message-----
From: RASA Keanini [mailto:Rkeanini@energy.state.ca.us]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:52 AM
To: Ring, Richard
Subject: auditor's reports

Hi Richard,

I am emailing you a spreadsheet that summarizes the generation information that we have recorded for the Monthly Performance Reports that listed generation produced in 2000. The spreadsheet that has the information is titled "Facility Breakdown". Please feel free to call or email me if you have any questions regarding the data.

If your records do not match the information provided, please let me know as soon as possible so that we can resolve the discrepancy. Thank you for your time and assistance.

Rasa Keanini
Customer Credit Subaccount
(916) 654-5379


Jan - can you please take care of scheduling this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
01/14/99 01:57 PM ---------------------------

Sharon Goodge
01/14/99 12:02 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Paul Waine's Visit 20 & 21 January

Mark,

Paul will be in Houston and was wondering if we could schedule an hour
meeting sometime during  Wednesday 20th and Thursday 21st January.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Regards

Sharon ++ 171 970 7003 (Direct)
Credit Risk Management - London


The Cristobal Prep Meeting (preceding Enron's hosting of the Alliance members
on Friday, February 4, 2000) to review Enron's plans for participation in the
Alliance RTO is scheduled for Tuesday, February 1 from 9:00a-11:00a in EB
49C3.  The agenda will be as follows:

Review JV analysis based on new inputs (Alliance wires and pipes) provided by
Alliance members (Lehman Brothers)
Address JV structural issues (see discussion below)
Review synergy presentation planned to be presented to the Alliance members
on the 4th (see discussion below)
Confirm steps and outcomes for the meeting on the 4th

Please call me if you have any questions or comments.  Thank you, Ron.

JV Structural Issues --

Description:  ENE to outline/summarize details re: all structural issues and
send to Alliance Partners prior to the 2/4 meeting in Houston.

Responsible Parties:  Mike Moran, Steve Van Hooser, and LeBouef (Steve will
be extending an invitation to LeBouef for the 1st)

Issues are as Follows )

o Structure (refers to Joint Venture Diagram)
? Does our structure address the criticisms outlined in FERC,s Order
? What is the appropriate corporate entity form ) Limited Partnership or
Limited Liability Corporation
? Structure Keys are a balance of --
_ Independence
_ Value
_ Control
? Is stock contribution advantageous and does it present issues for both GPG
and Alliance entities
o Approval Rights (Reference both the Alliance Order and the summary prepared
by LeBouef)
? FERC,s conditional order took exception to the Rights outlined in the
Alliance Proposal (it should be noted that some of these rights are different
then those proposed by Enron ) see LeBouef table outlining the two proposals
on p. 25.)
? Provide cites from approved structures
o By-Laws
o Directors/Managing Partners
? Focus on election of Directors with goal of maintaining independence
o Officers (a business issue)
o Stakeholder Groups
o Native Load
o Market Power

Value Proposition/Synergies --

Purpose: Identify synergies (value) in both cost savings, revenue enhancement
and financial engineering at NewCo/TransCo.

Timing and Responsible Parties:
           Synergy Categories
Value Definitions	Pipes to Pipes	Pipes to Wires	Wires to Wires
Cost Savings	ENRON/PWC (2/4)	ENRON/PWC (2/4)	ALLIANCE/AA (1/28)
Revenue Enhancements
o Product/Tariff Offerings
o Expansion	ENRON/PWC (2/4)	ENRON/PWC (2/4)	ALLIANCE/AA (1/28)
Financial Engineering (i.e., re-capitalization)	ENRON/PWC (2/4)	ENRON/PWC (2/4)	ALLIANCE/AA (1/28)


We need to ensure that the Fin Liq application in stage is moved to production before stage is shut down!!

Thanks!
Casey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Norman
Sent:	Monday, January  7, 2002 2:22 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Kathy
Cc:	Nommensen, Dave; Luu, Duong; Crooks, William; Yang, Zhiyun; Balasundaram, Arun; Govindasamy, Sivakumar; Zheng, Min
Subject:	Decommissioning of EnPower Stage  ( pwrtestp) Database.

Dear All,

	We are going to forever shutdown ( destroy) the EnPower Stage ( pwrtestp ) database in the near future, and would like to confirm if there is anything that should be saved or copied to another database. Please let us know.

	Thanks,

Norman.


no problem

Liz M Taylor
10/05/2000 11:11 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Feedback - Exec. Impact & Influence

Jeff,
We realize that you are no longer a direct report to Greg, however, he would
like you to submit feedback on him as a "direct report" from the  good old
ENA trading days.  READ BELOW

Many Thanks,

Liz
---------------------- Forwarded by Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 11:00
AM ---------------------------

Liz M Taylor
10/05/2000 10:57 AM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Fitzgerald/NY/ECT@ECT, Harry Arora/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron,
Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Feedback - Exec. Impact & Influence

Well, we finally got Greg Whalley enrolled in the "Executive Impact &
Influence" seminar.  Each of you have been listed for feedback in the "direct
report" category.  It is crucial to Greg's success in the program that all
feedback to be submitted.  Don't let this opportunity pass you by!

I'll check back with you in a couple of weeks to make sure you are in receipt
of the feedback forms.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor


I will also be faxing this section to your home.


Hey, since I hear you are doing the schedule now after all could you please
remember to have me not working March 31st thru the 3rd.  Also since the
schedule is totally going to change, if i work the 30th of March could you
put me on the day shift instead of night.  I had negotiated some changes so
that would work however, since it is going to change anyway please put me on
a day shift if possible as I already bought a ticket to leave on the evening
of the 30th.  Thanks.


Ray and ISAS -

Just going through the past four days of email, so please excuse this
response if it has been already addressed.

What was said at the Jan 17th meeting of the ESWG was, I (Bob Harshbarger)
was not prepared to address the issues surrounding voting, membership, etc.
at that meeting.

ESWG will have to adopt some form of structure if we are to proceed as
quickly as the ESC.  The ESWG was formed at the direction of the Joint
Guidance Committee.  We have been asked to consider formalized or structure
membership based on the same guidelines that ISAS has been given.  The
intent is not to leave anyone out but to ensure we can address issues in a
timely manner.

There is no perfect solution.  A weighted sector voting structure does
appear to give broader voice to the masses, yet even within a single sector
the participants can opposing view points and still feel under represented.
What the ESWG adopts is to be seen.

Robert Harshbarger
Puget Sound Energy
OASIS Trading Manager
425.462.3348 (desk)
206.604.3251 (cell)
mailto:bharsh@puget.com

cc: ESWG

> ----------
> From: 	Grinberg, Ray[SMTP:Ray.Grinberg@PacifiCorp.com]
> Sent: 	Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:57 AM
> To: 	Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
> Subject: 	RE: ISAS Meeting Agenda 2/14&15/2002
>
> Steve;
>
> I share Bob Winn's concerns regarding the administration and governance of
> the ISAS committee.   I've attended numerous meetings of the ISAS on
> behalf of Pinnacle West and now, PacifiCorp Power Marketing.   I never
> knew there was a formal requirement for membership.  If anything I thought
> that only Transmission providers were the actual voting members.  I
> believe this was how it was explained by mark hackney during one of last
> year's meetings.  As a marketer, and now a generation owner too, this was
> never and issue for me.  However your membership list (which I don't know
> where it came from) belies my understanding.  What exactly are the
> requirements to be a voting member of ISAS?
>
> If I am going to be excluded from active participation, I request that
> PacifiCorp Power Marketing  (PPMI) be added as a member of the ISAS and I
> as its representative.  PPMI is a separate legal entity from PacifiCorp
> the utility.  I don't want to get bogged down in the governance issues
> that dominated the ESC meeting in Las Vegas but I agree with Bob that
> there needs to be some "known" rules about membership and participation.
> But something along the ESC's membership requirements and voting structure
> may be appropriate.  Especially if the OC is concerned about the
> effectiveness of the ISAS committee.  I understand the OC's desire for the
> ISAS to be more effective, but it shouldn't come at the cost of denying
> participation to interested and affected parties.
>
> I request that we add this issue to the February Meeting Agenda.  I
> realize this could take up quite a bit of time, but I think its worth an
> hours discussion.
>
> I think you should be aware that at the meeting of the EWG at the Las
> Vegas Airport on Jan 17, the group decided to operate without a formal
> membership requirement and to allow all parties to participate and vote.
>
> Thanks for listening,
>
> Ray Grinberg
> PacifCorp Power Marketing, Inc.
> 650 NE Holladay, Suite 700
> Portland, OR  97232
> 503-813-5712
>
>
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: sccobb@srpnet.com [mailto:sccobb@srpnet.com]
> 	Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:05 PM
> 	To: RWINN@pnm.com
> 	Cc: ISAS@wscc.com; ISASCOR@wscc.com; dmillam@utilicorp.com;
> Demetrios.Fotiou@powerex.com; Dianeg@ncpa.com; ECHANG@wapa.gov;
> jmcintosh@caiso.com; MMEYER@wapa.gov; Mons.Ellingson@pinnaclewest.com;
> Ray.Grinberg@PacifiCorp.com
> 	Subject: RE: ISAS Meeting Agenda 2/14&15/2002
>
>
> 	Bob,
>
> 	I appreciate your input.
>
> 	The OC Steering Committee has asked us to become more effective. We
> need to do our best to satisfy their request.
>
> 	Our goal is to ensure we get the best product in the most efficient
> manner we can. ISAS has always had voting members. These members have
> determined the outcome of issues that the group is responsible for. I
> believe the current voting structure of ISAS is typical of the Operations
> Committee and the Sub-committees reporting to the OC. An OC member has the
> ability to appoint one representative from his/her company. In at least
> one case in the WSCC, an individual company has two OC members. One member
> represents the transmission/reliability side and one member represents the
> merchant side.
>
> 	Diverse opinions often lead to the best decisions. The intent of
> focusing on the voting members is to make the most of the limited time we
> have to make decisions. Non-voting members will still have the ability to
> take the floor to voice their views. However, the discussion will be
> limited so that we can complete our business. I suggest that we see how
> the February meeting goes. We can discuss proposed changes to the format
> prior to the next meeting. However, these changes must still comply with
> WSCC guidelines and OC direction.
>
> 	The Joint Guidance Committee is currently revising the "Guidelines
> For Administering the Membership of WSCC Subcommittees, Work Groups And
> Task Forces."
> 	The proposed revision is attached.
>
> 	Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: Winn, Robert [mailto:RWINN@pnm.com]
> 	Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:03 PM
> 	To: 'sccobb@srpnet.com'; ISAS Correspondents
> 	Subject: RE: ISAS Meeting Agenda 2/14&15/2002
>
>
>
> 		Steve,
>
>
> 		We have some concerns regarding the format you suggest for
> the upcoming ISAS meeting which consists of the agenda and discussion
> being driven primarily by the voting member.  As you know in PNM's case
> (and others) we have only one WSCC membership. Our Merchant and
> Reliability functions are still under the same company as required by
> current laws and regulations.  We do however operate as totally
> independent shops thus having different tasks, issues, insights and etc.
> Neither shop is able to sufficiently represent the issues of the other.
>
> 		We are concerned that by limiting discussions to only "the
> voting member" much insight will be lost.   We would be interested in
> hearing from both sides of a company on issues.  I would suggest this
> committee consider structuring discussion and voting privileges along the
> lines of those being set up in other industry forums {ESC, GISB, NAERO,
> NAESB and etc.} where a company represented in WSCC would have
> voting/discussion privileges for representatives from each business
> sector.  In WSCC that should include at least a Reliability and/or a
> Merchant rep.(if applicable) even if the company holds only one WSCC
> membership.
>
> 		I do understand and support the need to control the size of
> this meeting and would not want to see decisions made strictly from votes
> by those in attendance. We feel it very important to have fair
> representation in the subcommittee of all concerned entities.
>
> 		I have been trying to find someone at WSCC who is involved
> with revision of the document titled "Guidelines For Administering the
> Membership of WSCC Subcommittees, Work Groups And Task Forces" which you
> indicated was being revised.  I have not been able to find out who this
> person is and am unable to find anything about it on the WSCC web
> site...could you provide a name?  As you know, this document has not been
> modified since 1991.  We would like to make sure the revisions reflect the
> needs of all the industry as we know it today.  We have some thoughts and
> concerns which we would like considered in the revision process.
>
> 		Thanks,
> 		Bob Winn
> 		PNM
> 		-----Original Message-----
> 		From: sccobb@srpnet.com [ mailto:sccobb@srpnet.com]
> 		Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 8:18 PM
> 		To: ISAS Correspondents
> 		Subject: ISAS Meeting Agenda 2/14&15/2002
>
>
> 		ISAS Members and Guests,
>
> 		Attached is the agenda package for the February meeting. The
> hotel has
> 		extended the room availability through 2/1/02.
>
> 		Thanks.
>
> 		 <<WSCC Meeting 2-14-02.pdf>>  <<ISAS February 2002 Meeting
> >>
>
> ==========================================================================
> ==
>
> This email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
>
> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone
> else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized addressee,
> is unauthorized.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action omitted or taken in reliance on it, is
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this
> email in error, please contact the sender, delete this e-mail and destroy
> all copies.
>
>
> ==========================================================================
> ====
>
>
>


I have not stopped thinking about you!

xxx

Craig

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan.Scott@enron.com [mailto:Susan.Scott@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 10:12 AM
To: craigl@calpine.com
Subject:

I MISS YOU!


Wed is good

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Lohman, TK
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 9:31 AM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin
Subject:	Declined: Lunch TK / KH west end storage
When:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:30 AM-12:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:

Kevin, I have plans on Tues.  Can we do it Wed, Thurs. or Fri?

TK


Merci!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Waser, Iris
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:11 PM
To:	Rapp, Bill
Subject:	RE: Timekeeping - IMPORTANT MESSAGE REGARDING VACATION TIME LEFT THIS YEAR

Sure.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:52 PM
To:	Waser, Iris
Subject:	RE: Timekeeping - IMPORTANT MESSAGE REGARDING VACATION TIME LEFT THIS YEAR

	Iris,

		Thanks for the message. If it's not too much trouble, I would very much appreciate a printed report showing how much time I have left. Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Waser, Iris
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:40 PM
To:	Huber, Lee; Pryor, Tony; LaGesse, Denise; King Jr., Frazier; McCoppin, Dorothy; Holtzman, Staci; Cones, Janet; Rapp, Bill
Subject:	Timekeeping - IMPORTANT MESSAGE REGARDING VACATION TIME LEFT THIS YEAR

FYI (if you don't already know this)

I don't keep close watch of each and everyone's time.  That is, in the sense that I know how much vacation each of you has left this year.  I can print reports so you can keep up with it, but I don't police everyone's time that closely.  Just wanted everyone to know so if you loose some vacation, it will be your fault.

Let me know when you want another printout before year end.

I  :o)

Iris S. Waser
X3-6059
EB 4749b


Diana is having Prebon look into this. It's not the kind of trade their desk
would be doing right now, so they're skeptical; should just be a couple
minutes.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
12/01/2000 08:11 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Trade for 11-30-00

Any word yet on this trade?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/30/2000 05:57 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Trade for 11-30-00

Sean and Diana do not recognize this deal. They tried to check with the
brokers, but couldn't get a hold of anyone. I'll let you know first thing in
the morning whether or not this is good and what the deal number is.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/30/2000 03:08 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing Trade for 11-30-00

Prebon sent over a confirmation for the following trade for Sean Crandall
Enron buys from Aquila January  Mid-C 25 mw at $300.00


----- Original Message -----
From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@enron.com>
To: <jparks1@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:37 PM
Subject: FW:

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Denetsosie, Troy
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:32 PM
> To: Parks, Joe
> Subject:
>
> >  <<Entry2.xls>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************