Vince and Ken,

Dean Gil Whittaker of the Rice Business school has also confirmed!!  Pass the
word on to the students (no pressure!!  ha!!)
-
I think i'll go ahead and put the word out to some of the active Rice Alums
here at Enron--it'll be a great event!

Thanks!

--Christie.

--------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001
03:20 PM ---------------------------

"Gilbert R. Whitaker, Jr." <grwhit@rice.edu> on 04/11/2001 03:15:28 PM
To: Christie.Patrick@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: ALP presentation

Christie -

I have rearranged my schedule and will be very pleased to attend the ALP
presentation and dinner at Enron.

Thanks.

gil

At 06:01 PM 4/10/01 -0500, you wrote:
>President Gillis and Dean Whitaker,
>
>Enron would be honored with your presense at the presentation set forth
>below.
>
>Under the guidance of Vince Kaminski and his team here at Enron, we are
>thoroughly enjoying working with this group of bright and enthusiastic Rice
>students. We hope you can join us for the culmination of their significant
>efforts.
>
>Please let me know--Thanks!!
>
>--Christie.
>---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001
>05:52 PM ---------------------------
>
>
>Vince J Kaminski
>04/10/2001 08:13 AM
>
>To:   barrett@rice.edu, uecker@rice.edu, cmiller@rice.edu,
>       lounghrid@rice.edu, luigical@rice.edu
>cc:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
>       Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON
>
>Subject:  ALP presentation
>
>On behalf of  Enron Corp. I would like to invite you to an ALP Project
>presentation by a group of students
>of Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management, Rice University.
>
>The students will present the results of a research project regarding
>electronic trading
>platforms in the energy industry.
>
>The presentation will be held on May 7, at 4:00 p.m. at Enron, 1400 Smith.
>
>We would also like to invite you to dinner, following the presentation.
>
>
>Vince Kaminski
>
>Vincent Kaminski
>Managing Director - Research
>Enron Corp.
>1400 Smith Street
>Room EB1962
>Houston, TX 77002-7361
>
>Phone:    (713) 853 3848
>      (713) 410 5396 (cell)
>Fax  :      (713) 646 2503
>E-mail: vkamins@enron.com


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041907.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/19/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Mark:
Here is my list. Sorry I didn't get it to you sooner.
Carol


Locke, Liddell & Sapp LLP is proud to be a sponsor of Energy Venture Fair II being held in Houston at the J.W. Marriott on January 29-30, 2002.  Energy Venture Fair II presents a unique opportunity to survey some of the most dynamic investment opportunities in today's energy industry.  The conference is a forum for 75 of the best and brightest energy technology companies to educate prospective investors about the opportunity they represent.  Last year's event in Boston attracted over 325 participants, and this year's conference promises to be just as successful.
        Locke, Liddell & Sapp LLP will be hosting the conference's cocktail reception on the evening of January 29th from 5:30 to 7:00 p.m. at the J.W. Marriott.  Due to your involvement in the energy industry, I thought that Energy Venture Fair II would be of particular interest to you.  As our guest, you are entitled to a 25% discount off of the registration fee.  To receive your 25% discount, please contact Nannette Mooney with Infocast (the conference organizer) at (818) 888-4445, ext. 11, and mention our name.  For more details on and to register for Energy Venture Fair II, please click on http://www.energyventurefair.com/ . If you would like more information about Locke Liddell & Sapp, please click on http://www.lockeliddell.com .
        We hope to see you there.
H. William Swanstrom
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
Phone:  (713) 226-1143
Fax:  (713) 229-2518
bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/21/2000
02:50 PM ---------------------------
From: Thane Twiggs@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/21/2000 02:30 PM
To: Harry Kingerski@EES, James D Steffes@EES, Richard Shapiro@EES
cc:
Subject: CAL PUC

The commission just passed on a 3/2 vote the Duque position.  Duque was the
plan where "approximately 70% of all residential customers who consume 500
kWh or less will pay no more than $68 per month for electricity."  "The plan
will alsoensure that the approximately 70% of all commerical customers who
consume 1,500 kWh or less will pay no more than $220 per month."

Commissioner Lynch fears that the Duque plan will be tied up in legal
disputes rather than provide rate relief to the consumers.


I will be hosting an employee brown bag lunch meeting Wednesday, January 17,
beginning at 11:30 a.m. in Mt. Hood Conference Room.  Topics I will discuss
are listed below.

Why the shortage of power
Regulatory framework
California financial crisis
Political solutions

If you have questions about the energy crisis and how Enron fits into the
picture, this is your chance to get more information!


Most of the time we meet these deadlines.  Several days the P&L hasn't been
exported by 7:20 b/c I was waiting for the Management p&l changes, so that
there wouldn't be such large changes between our preliminary and final
p&l's.  If you rather I didn't wait let me know.  There have been a couple of
days I've just forgotten, but that's not a regular occurance.

Robin

Jeffrey C Gossett
12/07/2000 10:48 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: timing of submitting information to Risk Controls

Are we missing any of these "deadlines" and, if so, Why?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           12/07/2000 10:45 AM

To: Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, David
Maxwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Gary Stadler/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Heidi
Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jan-Erland Bekeng/AP/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Thibodeaux/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel
Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: timing of submitting information to Risk Controls

Over the past few weeks, we have not been receiving information from the risk
management groups on a timely basis.    This memo serves to convey our
deadlines to you and to reiterate deadlines for the risk management group.

Our reporting is as follows (Houston time):

7:45 - posting of preliminary DPR to website (needed to be done prior to RAC
8am meeting)
7:45 - 2:00 - preparation of the violation/notification memos
2:00 - finalization of the DPR & memos

In order to meet these deadlines we need the risk management departments to
meet the following deadlines (Houston time):

before leaving to go home (Houston): officialization of books (to ensure
information is captured in VAR engine and Credit AGG)
4:00 (London):  officialization and sending of feeds to IT
7:20 (all): export of preliminary information
7:20-3:00: support on explanations of violations/notification memos
11:00 (London only): export of final information (needed at that time for
Merchant Asset group)
12:00 (Houston only): export of final information

Everyday at least one group misses the deadline, which is unacceptable.
Please ensure deadlines are met going forward.  Remember, the DPR cannot go
out until all information is received and final so one group holds up the
whole process.

Thank you,

Shona Wilson


Is you mail being delivered to the incorrect address?  Are your courier
packages going to the wrong building?
If so, please let me know and I (as the Master Floor Plan Coordinator)  will
have the database updated.

Have a great day :)

Taffy Milligan
Sr. Admin Assistant
EWS-Legal
Tele: 713-345-7373
Fax:  713-646-6058


When is graduation?  And, of course I will show up.  Although, if I recall,
you didn't show up for mine!
You can send the announcement to 2512 Milam St. #5216, 77006.
I haven't heard of the advertising firm.  What kind of projects do they work
on?   I am going to Earth Day. Are you?  Are you bringing Rebecca again this
year?
We will probably go out to Kenneally's, Griff's or Birraporetti's for St.
Patty's day.  What about you?

e

Danielle Samson <DanielleS@JonesGranger.com> on 03/15/2000 06:02:28 AM
To: "'Eric Bass'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Hi there!

The fam is doing well.  Dad has been travelling for work and the rest of the
fam, just relaxing I guess.  This is spring break for the girls, so they
haven't been doing too much!  So, where do I send my graduation
announcement?  Do you think you will be able to show up?  Or are you too
busy?  I'm sending my resume to an advertising firm in town, today, Daily
Communications, have you ever heard of them?  Are you still thinking about
going to earth day?  What about st. Patricks day, are you doing anything?
-d

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Eric Bass [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 11:58 AM
  To: Danielle Samson
  Subject: Re: Hi there!

  Things are going well here.  I have been pretty busy losing
lots of money at
  work.
  Brian and Hector are going to Europe at the end of the
month, but I can't go
  because of work.  It doesn't bother me that much though.   I
will probably try
  to take a trip over there in May.  On top of that I am
thinking about a cruise
  this summer some time.
  Brian and I are actually moving this weekend to a new
apartment within the Park
  at Midtown.  Brian recently got his bike stolen from the
balcony, so we are
  going to move to an interior apartment.  Of course, I
wouldn't expect you to
  relate to any of this because you have never seen my
apartment.  Oh well, I
  guess you have your priorities.

  Other than that, not a whole lot going on.  How are things
with you and the fam?

  e

  Danielle Samson <DanielleS@JonesGranger.com> on 03/15/2000
05:24:32 AM

  To:   Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
  cc:
  Subject:  Hi there!

  Hey Ner,
  Just wanted to write you a quick note and say hi.  I hope
everything is
  going o.k.  I haven't heard from you in a while.  How's the
fam?  Any trips
  planned for you yet?  Have you found out anymore about the
Europe trip?  How
  is work going?  And the apartment?  Are you still getting
along with Brian?
  Hope all is going well.

  -Dee


For your information.  Please get with Geoff and Credit to see where we need
to go.  Thanks, Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 05/10/99 01:35
PM ---------------------------

Geoff Storey
05/05/99 04:18 PM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


JR,  Mr. Kirst is fine.  Please ask him to speak with Kevin Kuehler, Director
of E&C of HPL, at 713-571-3148 or if he isn't available, Gene Peabody,
Project Manager, at 713-571-3153.  I would think he should start either this
pm or tomorrow.

Gerald,  we do not have a PSA with S&B Engineers; we either need to prepare
one or utilize Mr. Kirst for this short term need based on the rate below and
an invoice at the end of the assignment.  Please coordinate with Kevin.

Thanks,

Nick

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Reddish, J.R." <hjreddish@sbinfra.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Reddish+2C+20J+2ER+2E+22+20+3Chjreddish+40sbinfra+2Ecom+
3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 5:34 PM
To: Cocavessis, Nick
Subject: FW: Request for Assistance

Lets try this again.

JR

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Reddish, J.R.
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 5:27 PM
> To: 'nickcocavessis@enron.com'
> Cc: Kirst, Eddie; Flesch, Fred
> Subject: Request for Assistance
>
> Nick,
>
> S&B Infrastructure is happy to submit Mr. Eddie Kirst, P.E. to assist
> ENRON with the loop 197 effort.   He is a seasoned civil engineer with
> over 17 years of paving and underground utility experience in the Houston
> metropolitan area.   He is no stranger to Texas City and loop 197.    He
> grew up three blocks off 197 and 9th Ave in Texas City.   Eddie is
> available tomorrow afternoon or at your convince.
>
> Our understanding is the effort will last approximately a week to 10 days.
>
>
> Eddie's all in rate is $ 108.00/hour plus expenses.
>
> Should you accept the above offer please forward address and phone contact
> information to assist Eddie in locating your project manager.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Harold J. Reddish, P.E.
> "JR"
> Vice President of Operations


Start Date: 3/16/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031613.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:   2.00 / Final:   2.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: WheelSHAST
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/16/01
  UNIT_ID: WSENGY_1_UNIT 4
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  22.58)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: TOSCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/16/01
  UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  11.00 / Final:  12.20)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/16/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  52.00 / Final:  44.91)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/16/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DVPLV
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  50.00 / Final:  43.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/16/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:   5.56 / Final:   4.57)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/16/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  50.78 / Final:  42.47)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/16/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Kim,

As promised, here are all the files I have on California entities' gas
assets/contracts.  I have summarized what they are below.  Some of the data
is old; however, I think most of it largely reflects current usage, etc.....

1.  GS_ACCRD:  Palo Alto gas load summary.
2,  SMUD Assets & Load
3.  CA-Power-Plants:  summary of all generation assets in California
4   DWP Gas Assets:  Summary of gas Transport Assets & Contracts
5.  gas consumption:  LADWP historical gas use
6.  Gas Fired Resources:   LADWP's Asset Summary
7.  Glendale Loads..:  Generation Asset Summary
8.  LOADPROF:  City of Long Beach Historical Load Data
9.  Prepay:  Summary of Quantities & Physical Delivery Premiums
10.  Santa Clara's Generation Asset Summary
11.  Usage History:  1998 Pasadena Gas Data

Laird


Here is an older project mode we used.  Please do not show this to anyone.
You can pull out some of the Caledonia information from this model.  Let me
know if you have any questions.
Ben


Another Government utility accordingly the restrictions to Australian weather
and power are appropriate.

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 14/11/2000 06:01 PM CDT
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: EOL Credit Responses 11/14/00

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 05:00 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	11/14/2000 04:53 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 11/14/00

Regards,
bd


Becky,

Who instructed you to send out this form?

Kim

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Becky Young                           09/18/2000 04:18 PM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Candidate Evaluation for Jeff Rosenzweig

Please fill out the attached form and return to Becky Young at your earliest
convenience.

Thanks,
Becky
x30622


This is due today.  Any comments, please let me know asap.  Thanks.

JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com> on 10/01/99 03:25:18 PM

To:	Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc:

Subject:	Comments on Asset Valuation Application PD

 <<X04987.DOC>>

Mona -- let me know what you think -- it has to be filed on Monday.

Jeanne

 - X04987.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark S Muller/HOU/EES on 07/10/2001 07:50 AM ---------------------------

Tracy Price <tprice@fieldcentrix.com> on 07/09/2001 06:03:29 PM
To:	"'mmuller@enron.com'" <mmuller@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	FW: where does our energy come from?

FYI, Curt is a friend of mine, and past head of the California legislature,
a Republican.

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Curt Pringle [mailto:Curt@curtpringle.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 3:23 PM
Subject:	where does our energy come from?

Assemblyman Bill Leonard's most recent e-newsletter contained the following
information.  I think it is very interesting to consider in light of the
present energy situation in California and the comments of our present
Governor.
Regards,
Curt

---------------------------------------------

***Who Really Powers California?***
Governor Davis has made no secret that he believes that swashbuckling,
cattle rustling, energy barons from Texas are to blame for our energy
crisis.  While Texas power companies make for good bad guys in the
Governor's transparent Kabuki theater of blame, Leonard Letter readers
may
be interested to see who really provides power to Californians.  The
following list illustrates what percentage of our power supply each
group of
generators provides. (Editor's note: these percentages have been rounded
up
resulting in slightly more than 100%)
18%- Pacific Gas and Electric (California)
15%- Southern California Edison (California)
11%- Imported power from the Northwest (including Canada)
10%- Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (California)
10%- Imported power from the Southwest
7%- State and Federal Agencies
6%- AES power company
5%- Municipal Utilities and Irrigation Districts
5%- Reliant power company
4%- Duke power company
4%- Southern power company
4%- Dynegy power company
1%- Sacramento Municipal Utility District (California)
1%- Calpine power company
1%- San Diego Gas and Electric (California)

It should be noted that of this list, only Dynegy and Reliant are from
Texas.  These two companies represent a total of 9% of California's energy
portfolio.  By comparison, Georgia-based Southern (Mirant), Virginia's AES,
and North Carolina's Duke Energy, have a 14% share of our energy portfolio.
This list does not focus on who is gaming the market.  However, every
provider listed benefited from skyrocketing energy prices.  In trying to
identify those power producers who used market power to ring up high profits
on Californians, we should include ALL power producers in our
investigations.  State and federal agencies, independent power companies,
utilities, municipal utilities, and even local irrigation districts could
all be guilty of gouging consumers.  Davis's focusing on only those
companies from Texas does everyone in this state a disservice and is a
misrepresentation of fact.

------------------------------

Curt Pringle
Curt Pringle & Assoc.
2532 Dupont Drive
Irvine, CA 92612

(949) 474-4090
(949) 474-4082 fax


Hello:
I just wanted to arrange to meet for the Astros tickets.
I work and live downtown.
My cell phone number is 713-557-3330.
Thanks,
John


anybody want four good tix to tonight's baseball game


Just after the conference call, I was able to get this order.


Aloha!

There has never been a better time to book your Hawaiian vacation!
Why?  Because you'll SAVE $150 per couple to Hawaii's Big Island!
(in addition to our already great prices!)

HAWAII'S BIG ISLAND:

The Big Island has 11 of the 13 world climatic regions, making
it the most diverse Hawaiian island and offering something for
everyone...

- visit the orchid gardens and hike through the tropical rain forest
  on the eastern side of the island

- visit historical sites and experience fantastic snorkeling on the
  western side of the island

- relax at the sunny beach resorts on the northern part of the island

- don't miss the Volcano National Park and macadamia nut farms on the
  southern end of the island

- golf at some of the most incredible courses in the world!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Big Island "must sees"

- Waipi'o Valley - once the home of kings of old Hawaii

- Rainbow Falls - one of the Big Island's loveliest waterfalls

- Black Sand Beaches - made up of pulverized lava, located on the
  south-eastern cliff

- White Sand Beaches - Hapuna State Beach Park, Anaehoomalu Beach,
  and Magic Sands Beach, Kailua

- Volcanoes National Park - the number one visitor attraction in the
  state is also home to Kilauea Volcano, the world's most active volcano
  which continues to pour into the ocean - making the Big Island even
  bigger each day!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Be sure to take advantage of the fantastic tours available:
- Dan McSweeney's Whale Watching
- Island Breeze Lu'au
- Fluming the Ditch (kayak trip)
- Captain Bean's Dinner Cruise
- Deluxe Morning Luncheon Cruise

And don't forget about your Dollar rental car to truly "discover"
the Big Island.

You've been waiting all year long for a sale like this... so book
now before it's too late!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here are the details on how to save $150 per couple when vacationing
to the Big Island:

- Must book by 12/21/01

- Valid for bulk air/hotel vacations (not valid for hotel-only vacation,
  air/car vacations, or published airfare vacations)

- Valid for all scheduled airlines offered by Funjet Vacations to
  Hawaii, including United Airlines, American Airlines,
  Continental Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and Hawaiian Airlines

- Valid for all hotels on the Big Island

- Valid from origins nationwide

- Discount is $75 per adult (ages 18 and older) and must be booked
  through a travel agent's electronic booking system or online.

To book a vacation on the Big Island, we recommend you contact your
preferred travel agent or visit http://www.funjet.com/plan/index.htm

Mahalo!

Kate

If you would like to unsubscribe to the email specials list, please visit
http://www.funjet.com/unsub.htm

OT: mcuilla@ECT.ENRON.COM


thank you for the quick turnaround.

From: Samantha Boyd@ENRON on 11/17/2000 11:57 AM
To: dkolk@compenergy.com
cc: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Southern California Water Co. - ISDA

Mr. Kolk:

At the request of Chris Foster, I am forwarding to your attention the draft
of the following documents:

1.  Schedule to the Master Agreement; and
2.  Paragraph 13 to the Credit Support Annex

Please note that  the "Boiler Plate" of the ISDA Master Agreement and the
Credit Support Annex can not be transmitted via e-mail.  In order to expedite
your review of the Schedule and Paragraph 13, Chris advised me to send you
these documents via e-mail.

If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please feel free to
contact me at (713) 853-9188 or you may contact Mary Cook at (713) 345-7732.
We look forward to hearing from you soon.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


Thanks.  I'm going to cut and paste these comments into the comment section
in deal entry.  These are the kind of comments we need in deal entry for a
record on deals that require special handling.

S

Diana Scholtes
03/01/2001 12:54 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Modesto deals

We have an existing option that is not valuing properly.  In order to keep
enpower balanced, we entered these deals into the system as a buy/re-sale
instead of an option.  Please do not confirm these deal with Modesto.  They
have been confirmed previously as part of the option.

Diana Scholtes

   Kate Symes                03/01/2001 09:23 AM

To: Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Modesto deals

Will you be sending confirm letters on these Modesto deals, or just verbally
confirming them? Could you let Sharen or myself know so we can get something
on record with the Confirms group in Houston?

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/01/2001 09:27 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/01/2001 09:29 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Modesto deals

Thanks and yes, we will need copies of the letters.  If she could send us the
same copy she sends to the counterparty, then we can put it into our files
and we won't have to call her repeatedly when we are trying to get a signed
copy from the counterparty for the files.

thanks!

   Kate Symes                03/01/2001 10:32 AM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Modesto deals

Diana just told me that these deals are NOT supposed to be confirmed. She's
taking care of that. Let me know if you need copies of the letters or if
you'd like to speak to Diana directly.

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/01/2001 07:14 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Modesto deals

There are four deals on the no report that look like they sould be
confirmed.  Can you take a look at them and check to see why they are coded
not to be confirmed?

#533919
#533931
#533932
#533934

I guess you have seen the email that shows what your computer looks like when
you work in (or apparently near) California?  You open it and the screen
starts moving around.

Stay well!


I've heard that the turbines are supposed to be moved out of WestLB today.
The contract with GE is not quite finished, although it is close.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000 08:54
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Global Finance

	From:  Catherine Clark @ ECT                           11/27/2000 08:44 AM

To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Austin Project Purchase Option

---------------------- Forwarded by Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
08:45 AM ---------------------------

"Taylor, Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com> on 11/24/2000 12:55:59 PM
To: <toxley@winston.com>, <roseann.engeldorf@enron.com>,
<catherine.clark@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Austin Project Purchase Option

Attached is a revised draft of the Purchase Option Assignment and
Assumption Agreement for the LM6000s to be used in the Austin Project.
The attached reflects the comments of Winston & Strawn.  Also attached
is an execution copy of the agreement.

Serial numbers and other identifying information should be inserted on
Schedule 1 to the agreement prior to execution.

Please call me if you have any questions or comments.

Regards,

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel: (713) 220-4436
Fax: (713) 238-7273
e-mail: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
(i) do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents hereof to others
(any of the foregoing being strictly prohibited), (ii) notify the sender
immediately of your receipt hereof, and (iii) delete this e-mail and all
copies of it.
 <<Purchase Option Assignment/Assumption.DOC>>  <<PO (Austin) -
Compare.DOC>>
 - Assumption.DOC
 - PO (Austin) - Compare.DOC


I will be out on scheduled vacation next week and am sending you my contact info just in case . . .

Joanne & Richard Rozycki
2005 Cheryl Drive
Pearland, Texas 77581
(281) 485-9782
rozycki@iwon.com

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


How about tomorrow at 10:00 am?

David P Dupre
11/02/99 12:46 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Catalytica Combustion Systems

Let's meet to discuss this confirmation when you have an opportunity.
Dale mentioned yesterday that this would 'resurface' in the near future.

Regards,
David
3-3528


Hey Shorty,

I hope your day is going well.  We took our MD out for lunch because he is
relocating to NY and will spend about a week in Houston a month.  Well, to
make a short story long, we ate at Erma's (great food) but I am getting very
sleepy (life is difficult I know) from eating way too much.  I assume we are
going home to change into some casual/hot weather clothes before dinner
tomorrow and I may need you to pick me up.  I am still looking for some good
jokes that I can send to you that are funny but still moderately appropriate
(most are completely inappropriate - I have sick friends).  Check out
www.darwinawards.com for some funny but true stories.  I'll talk to you later.

Ted

Susan M Scott
07/18/2000 11:43 AM
To: Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Every day needs a little dose of levity...

Fifth grade assignment

The teacher gave her fifth grade class an assignment:
Get their parents to tell them a story with a moral at
the end of it. The next day the kids came back and one
by one began to tell their stories.

Kathy said, "My father's a farmer and we have a lot of
egg-laying hens.  One time we were taking our eggs to
market in a basket on the front seat of the pickup when
we hit a bump in the road and all the eggs went flying
and broke and made a mess."  "And what's the moral of
the story?" Asked the teacher.  "Don't put all your eggs
in one basket!"  "Very good," said the teacher.

"Now, Lucy?"

"Our family are farmers too.  But we raise chickens for
the meat market.  We had a dozen eggs one time, but when
they hatched we only got ten live chicks. And the moral
to this story is, don't count your chickens until they're
hatched."  "That was a fine story Lucy."

"Johnny do you have a story to share?"

"Yes, ma'am, my daddy told me this story about my uncle Bob.
Uncle Bob was a pilot in Vietnam and his plane got hit.  He
had to bail out over enemy territory and all he had was a
bottle of whiskey, a machine gun and a machete. He drank the
whiskey on the way down so it wouldn't break and then he
landed right in the middle of 100 enemy troops.  He killed
seventy of them with the machine gun until he ran out of
bullets, then he killed twenty more with the machete till the
blade broke and then he killed the last ten with his bare hands."
"Good heavens," said the horrified teacher, "What kind of moral
did your daddy tell you from that horrible story?"

"Don't fuck with Uncle Bob when he's been drinking."


Please find attached translation of an article from Too Nippo dated
March 16.

Best regards,
IRJ PR Services

 - Too Nippo 10316.doc


Please review and let's discuss.


----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 12/27/2000 11:42 AM -----

	"Tabors, Richard" <tabors@tca-us.com>
	12/27/2000 10:39 AM

		 To: dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, snovose@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Today's Van Vactor column

Dan and Sarah

I don't know if you see Sam VanVactor's materials or not.  If not, here is a
shot from the 26th

Richard

-------------------------------------------
Copyright , 2000 Economic Insight, Inc .
EDITORIAL
S.A. VAN VACTOR
Energy Crisis Myths
Mythology has always been an important part of the
human experience and never more so than when hard
choices must be made. Thus it should come as no
surprise that our current energy crisis is accompanied by
a seemingly endless array of apologies, exaggerations,
and myths.
Far and away the most common myth concerns the
persistent view of many that suppliers are holding back
generation in order to jack up prices. Similar charges
were levied during the oil crises of the 1970s. In those
days, critics complained that tankers could be seen just
off the coast, waiting until prices rose. Holding back on
electricity sales makes even less sense because once a
moment of demand has passed, it is gone forever. No
rational supplier will turn down the price offers persisting
in the present marketplace day after day. Indeed, most
suppliers are laboring to squeeze out every electron
possible from aging and unreliable generators.
An equally common error arises when the crisis is
blamed on "deregulation" and free markets. Although
California was the first state to adopt wide-scale
consumer choice, its market has been heavily regulated
and constrained. For example, after nearly three years
of consumer choice in the retail market only 12% of the
total volume is served by entities other than traditional
utilities. The volume of direct access has actually
declined in recent months as buyers have scrambled to
reconnect to regulated utilities that offer frozen rates.
More importantly, the development of reliable forward
markets and planning was stillborn because the
California Public Utility Commission either prohibited or
limited such trading at the same time that it granted
automatic "prudency" to spot purchases. Deregulation
may have changed the nature of the crisis, from a
physical to a financial problem, but the demand and
supply fundamentals at the heart of the current energy
crises were inherited from an earlier era of regulatory
stumbles.
Officials in neighboring states are eager to blame
California for the crisis, but nothing could be further from
the truth. The Western power market is fully
interconnected by design and if one part is short, all
regions are short. In fact, every operating area
recognized that demand would occasionally exceed
supply; planners simply relied on the proposition that it
would not happen simultaneously in all regions of the
West. However, this is exactly what has happened.
The current crisis was precipitated by a scarcity of
natural gas, unexpected demand growth in California
and the Southwest, the second hottest summer on
record in the Southwest, and low water runs in Northern
California and the Pacific Northwest.
If these myths are at odds with reality, how should the
energy crisis be viewed? Famine and pestilence are
normally reserved for biblical parables, but they do play
a role in this story. The Western power market is tied to
the vast generation potential of the region's hydroelectric
system. The system's potential is not, however, always
available. Unlike hydro systems in Quebec and Brazil,
the Columbia River system has only three months worth
of water storage. (Quebec is said to have ten years of
water inventory). The difference between a drought and a
year flush with water can be as high as 6,000 average
megawatts per hour - roughly the capacity of six of the
West's nuclear generating stations. Thus, the availability
of electricity swings from abundance to scarcity in an
unpredictable pattern based on the state of the region's
rivers. In the key months of June and July this year,
hydroelectric generation from the Northwest Power Pool
averaged 4,635 megawatts per hour below that of the
favorable year of 1997.
System planners in the 1970s understood the nature of
the hydroelectric system very well and planned to add
thermal generation facilities to ensure adequate supply
even under "critical-water" conditions. These conditions
represented the worst-case scenario for hydroelectric
generation. Such planning, however, renders most
prospective thermal plants uneconomic, because they
would lay idle except under the driest of conditions. With
the collapse of the WPPSS plants, the Pacific Northwest
quietly shifted its planning criteria from critical water to
average water. In times of heavy water flow the region is
a net exporter, but during a drought, it must import
electricity.
Over the last decade, utility planning has been replaced
by a market, and not just in California. Almost all new
generators are independent power producers. In a
market, new supply will only be built if there is the
incentive to do so. That incentive takes the form of
profits, and profits arise through high prices. What no one
has thought through is the implications of the variability of
hydro-electric power on the incentive to construct thermal
generation. If new thermal generation is constructed, but
is only needed one out of every ten years, then prices in
years of drought must be extremely high in order to make
building such thermal plants attractive to investors. In
short, this is what the western power market is
experiencing this year, and will continue to experience
until water flows improve and new supplies catch up with
the region's overall economic growth.
The first step in solving a problem is to understand its
cause. While it is true that California and other Western
states have not invested sufficiently in generation
capacity and natural gas delivery systems, additional
supply is not, by itself, the answer. Politicians, planners,
and market participants alike must recognize that drought
years will produce power shortages, and they should plan
accordingly. The extremely high prices observed this last
month arise, in part, from fear that the Pacific Northwest
may be entering a cycle of cold, dry weather. So far the
reaction has been uneven and not terribly productive.
Instead of blaming suppliers or each other, the region's
leaders should implement energy conservation programs
aimed at solving a short-term, not just a long-term
problem. Publicity that explains the situation with the aim
of conservation among consumers, "buy-back" programs
for industrial and commercial customers, and other such
pricing incentives should be implemented as rapidly as
possible, before low water forces everyone into rolling
blackouts and manufacturing curtailments.
Samuel A. Van Vactor is the publisher of the Energy
Market Report, and former Head of Planning for the
Oregon Department of Energy.
The Energy Market Report welcomes unsolicited
manuscripts for possible publication. Editorials can be
sent by electronic mail only to emr@econ.com <mailto:emr@econ.com> .


Executive Summary
? California Treasurer Angelides Sets Dates for Bridge Loans & Bonds
? California's Supreme Court May See Challenge to "Plan B"

Angelides on Bridge Loans and Bonds
CA Treasurer Angelides has said that beginning 15 August, the state will set
up a bridge loan.  The revenue bonds will not be issued until September or
October.  Angelides is not concerned about a cash crisis in July or August.
However, he is quite worried about problems with cash flow in October and
November.  This is based on calculations he has done with numbers from the
DWR and from other parts of the government, not on payment terms for power.
He fears there will be a cash management problem.

California Supreme Court to Challenge "Plan B"
California Attorney Michael Sturmwasser is expected to challenge "Plan B"
before the California Supreme Court on the basis that it results in a
retroactive rate increase and that it removes the PUC's authority to review
power purchases.  This is because "Plan B" enables SoCal to collect a
dedicated rate component to pay both its undercollect and its expenses going
forward.  SoCal (and PG&E) would have to be guaranteed this dedicated rate
component to be able to operate going forward and remain credit-worthy.  This
takes the burden of financing the energy crisis away from the state and off
the state's balance sheet, a key goal of lawmakers.  However, at the same
time, it also abrogates the PUC from its responsibility to review power
purchases.  The state cannot give the utilities a blank check (in the form of
a dedicated rate component) to operate without taking authority away from the
PUC.  According to the California constitution, the legislature can add to
the responsibilities of the PUC, but it cannot take away powers from the
PUC.  At the same time, ratepayers will be paying an additional surcharge for
power that they have already used.  Sources describe Sturmwasser's case as
"arguable"; in other words, it has a fair chance of succeeding.  However,
regardless of whether the challenge succeeds or fails, it is very likely to
cloud the issue of the bail-out and significantly deflate the prospects of
the Plan B.

If FERC were to impose cost-based controls on power prices, sources believe
it might "go a long way toward avoiding these problems."  Were this to
happen, the PUC could declare FERC's rates "just and reasonable," which would
likely greatly lessen the crisis and keep SoCal liquid.  However, such
measures by FERC require significant lead time.  Sources state that "the
state needs to tease the feds into doing this."  This can be done by
conducting studies to obtain current cost data and update the data FERC would
use for determining the cost controls.  Sources report that this process of
"teasing" FERC has not yet started.  This is chiefly because California
politicians are focused on flat price caps, which FERC is very unlikely to
impose.  It appears the state is asking FERC for the wrong measures, which is
delaying the process.  The only way for the state to avoid these
constitutional issues would be for the state to purchase the utilities, as
municipal entities would not be subject to PUC regulation.  However, there
remains very significant opposition to this idea, especially on the
Republican side.  A state purchase of the utilities would likely only gain
momentum once Plan B began to fail for the reasons cited above.
Additionally, a state purchase of the utilities would be less expensive were
both utilities in bankruptcy.

Sturmwasser is a partner at Sturmwasser & Woocher, a Santa Monica law firm.
(His offices are on the top floor of the tallest building in Santa Monica,
overlooking the beach.)  He has been a utilities lawyer for over 30 years.
His clients include the consumer advocacy group TURN (Toward Utilities Rate
Normalcy), among others.  Sturmwasser will reportedly look for funding to
support the legal challenge, but if he cannot find money elsewhere, he will
likely be able to support it out of his own pocket.


Here's a new deal for you.

I've got two follow on deals for K & S, so this one might be a good one to
use someone else, if you need and want to. (I hear the rustling of the
pines..)  Clear outside counsel selections with Jeff, then Mark, etc.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/27/2001 08:15
AM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
02/23/2001 02:01 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: CA - Onondaga

Kay:

Ben and I are working on a deal that involves the monetization of a Cash Flow
Interest which ENA currently holds in Onondaga Cogeneration L.P. (an 80 MW
combined cycle plant in NY state)

We would like to begin discussions next week with parties interested in
purchasing ENA's interest in OCLP.  Please prepare a form CA and forward to
Ben and I so that we may forward it to the interested counterparties.  We
also need one draft CA prepared for the following counterparty:

 Trust Company of the West

Sheila has inititated the process of assigning the Cash Flow Interest from
ENA into an LLC.

Call me if you wish to discuss.

Fred


Nope.  Not mine.

Two of the deals I've been working on died. I've had almost NO voice mails
today, and a third as many emails.  This is great.  Maybe Neil and  I will
get to take our vacation after all!

Kay


Dan,

Delete the other e-mail I sent and use this one.

This is the latest and greatest. I changed Gatherer to Provider and Gathering
Service to Field Services.

I deleted the last sentence in Section 5 - Pressures.  Let me know if this is
a problem. This line was added to other agreements at the request of those
parties.

Hope you had a GREAT weekend.

Mike


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:49 PM -----

	BTC <BCragg@GMSSR.com>
	02/15/2001 09:36 PM

		 To: "'Alan.Comnes@enron.com'" <Alan.Comnes@enron.com>,
"'Chris.H.Foster@enron.com'" <Chris.H.Foster@enron.com>,
"'Christian.Yoder@enron.com'" <Christian.Yoder@enron.com>,
"'Christopher.F.Calger@enron.com'" <Christopher.F.Calger@enron.com>,
"'Cynthia.Sandherr@enron.com'" <Cynthia.Sandherr@enron.com>,
"'dleff@enron.com'" <dleff@enron.com>, "'David.W.Delainey@enron.com'"
<David.W.Delainey@enron.com>, "'dbenevid@enron.com'" <dbenevid@enron.com>,
"'dblack@enron.com'" <dblack@enron.com>, "'Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com'"
<Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com>, "'etilney@enron.com'" <etilney@enron.com>,
"'Eric.Thode@enron.com'" <Eric.Thode@enron.com>, "'gsavage@enron.com'"
<gsavage@enron.com>, "'Greg.Wolfe@enron.com'" <Greg.Wolfe@enron.com>,
"'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Jeffrey.T.Hodge@enron.com'" <Jeffrey.T.Hodge@enron.com>,
"'JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM'" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>, "'Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com'"
<Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, "'John.J.Lavorato@enron.com'"
<John.J.Lavorato@enron.com>, "'John.Neslage@enron.com'"
<John.Neslage@enron.com>, "'jwhalan@enron.com'" <jwhalan@enron.com>,
"'Kathryn.Corbally@enron.com'" <Kathryn.Corbally@enron.com>,
"'Keith.Holst@enron.com'" <Keith.Holst@enron.com>,
"'Kristin.Walsh@enron.com'" <Kristin.Walsh@enron.com>,
"'Leslie.Lawner@enron.com'" <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>,
"'Linda.Robertson@enron.com'" <Linda.Robertson@enron.com>,
"'Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com'" <Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com>,
"'Margaret.Carson@enron.com'" <Margaret.Carson@enron.com>,
"'Mark.Palmer@enron.com'" <Mark.Palmer@enron.com>, "'msunde@enron.com'"
<msunde@enron.com>, "'Mary.Hain@enron.com'" <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
"'Mary.Schoen@enron.com'" <Mary.Schoen@enron.com>,
"'Michael.Tribolet@enron.com'" <Michael.Tribolet@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'Mike.Grigsby@enron.com'"
<Mike.Grigsby@enron.com>, "'nbresnan@enron.com'" <nbresnan@enron.com>,
"'Paul.Kaufman@enron.com'" <Paul.Kaufman@enron.com>,
"'Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com'" <Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com>,
"'Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com'" <Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com>,
"'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'Richard.Shapiro@enron.com'" <Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>,
"'Rob.Bradley@enron.com'" <Rob.Bradley@enron.com>,
"'Robert.Badeer@enron.com'" <Robert.Badeer@enron.com>,
"'Robert.C.Williams@enron.com'" <Robert.C.Williams@enron.com>,
"'Robert.Frank@enron.com'" <Robert.Frank@enron.com>,
"'Robert.Johnston@enron.com'" <Robert.Johnston@enron.com>,
"'Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com'" <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>,
"'sstoness@enron.com'" <sstoness@enron.com>, "'Shelley.Corman@enron.com'"
<Shelley.Corman@enron.com>, "'Steve.C.Hall@enron.com'"
<Steve.C.Hall@enron.com>, "'Steve.Walton@enron.com'"
<Steve.Walton@enron.com>, "'Steven.J.Kean@enron.com'"
<Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, "'Susan.J.Mara@enron.com'"
<Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>, "'Tim.Belden@enron.com'" <Tim.Belden@enron.com>,
"'Tom.Briggs@enron.com'" <Tom.Briggs@enron.com>,
"'Travis.McCullough@enron.com'" <Travis.McCullough@enron.com>,
"'Vance.Meyer@enron.com'" <Vance.Meyer@enron.com>, "'vsharp@enron.com'"
<vsharp@enron.com>, "'William.S.Bradford@enron.com'"
<William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, "'Harry.Kingerski@enron.com'"
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "'James.D.Steffes@enron.com'"
<James.D.Steffes@enron.com>
		 cc: MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com>, JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com>, "'Scott Govenar, Enron
lobbyist'" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "'Samuel.Wehn@enron.com'"
<Samuel.Wehn@enron.com>, "'bogilby@mdbe.com'" <bogilby@mdbe.com>
		 Subject: Part 4, revised

Attached is a revised version of Mike Day's draft of Part 4 of the
legislative package, on expedited permitting of new and expanded electric
generating capacity.  I have tried to incorporate the thoughtful comments
provided to me by Sam Wehn of ENA and Barry Ogilby of McCutcheon (outside
counsel).  Since Mike will soon be off on a family vacation, please direct
any comments or questions to me at 415-765-8413 or bcragg@gmssr.com.

 <<PART4.DOC>>

 - X21095.DOC


Heather,

Could we handle the CRRA LOI at the same time?  It would help me get finished
with the FCE doc.

I'm sure you saw that GE and Honeywell are merging.  I wonder if that makes
ONSI a part of GE?  Does GE have a fuel cell product yet? It would explain
the statement in the Journal that headquarters would not be in NJ or
Connecticut.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/23/2000 08:47
AM ---------------------------

Stephen Plauche
10/23/2000 08:47 AM
To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer N Stewart/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudette Harvey/HOU/ECT@ect

Subject: Fuel Cell Meeting

Team,

 Scott should be in the office at 1:00 pm today and would like to have a
meeting with everyone to review where we are and what the punch list is for
this week and next week.  If you are available at 1:00 today, please let me
know so that I can get a conference room.  Thanks.

Stephen


hope you enjoyed france.
MRC

Oct. 2, 2000, 11:58PM

Houston Heights Association presents deed restriction proposal

By MARTIN HAJOVSKY
Home in the Heights

After more than a year of work, the Houston Heights Association's board
of directors last month accepted a set of proposed revisions to the
Heights' deed restrictions. The revisions are intended to severely
curtail prospective townhome and other new construction considered by
the association to be inappropriate to the historic nature and character
of the area.

Just over 20 percent of Houston Heights properties are currently
protected by the deed restriction documents, first drafted by the
association more than 20 years ago. The updates are necessary in order
to keep pace with current threats to the neighborhood, according to
association President Allan Tiller.

"When the restriction documents were first drafted, the perceived threat
was from commercial intrusion, having a business set up next to your
home," he said. "Now with the rise in property values, that's not as
much of a threat. What is a threat is the possibility that townhomes
with their canyons of garage doors up and down the street will replace
the essential character of the neighborhood with a level of density that
is inappropriate."

Tiller is not dismayed by the fact that after two decades of work, only
a minority of area homeowners have signed on.

"Certainly we want this to extend to everyone in the neighborhood and
we're working to do that," he said. "But just the fact that you have it
and it's publicized means that it becomes kind of a guideline for the
neighborhood, and builders and developers are still reluctant to go in
and change that or build anything contrary to that. That's been my
experience."

The proposed revisions deal with eight major areas in new construction
dealing with design, density and placement, but not use, of properties.

? Setbacks -- A house or structure would have to leave at least three
feet, increased from the current two, on the sides, three feet from the
back and 15 feet from the front. Corner lots would have the 15-foot
setback apply on both sides facing a street (similar to the city's
10-foot front setback rule).

? Front-facing construction -- Any new house will have to face the
street rather than a common private driveway to prevent multiple-unit
"compound"-type construction.

? Common wall construction -- Although the association board feels that
the setback rules should generally prevent common-wall construction (two
units sharing a common exterior wall), this provision was put in to help
ensure that the prohibition is not circumvented by multiple-unit
construction on a single lot, such as apartments.

? Garage setback -- The new restrictions would require that any garage
facing the street be set back at least halfway to the back lot line, and
in any event be no closer to the street than the front of the house
itself. This is the case throughout the Heights currently, where garages
are generally unseen from the street, as opposed to the newer townhome
styles found throughout the Montrose area and the West End near Memorial
Park.

? Garage-dominated front -- A new provision would mandate that a
front-facing garage door could not take up more than a half of the
first-floor front of the house, a direct blow at the most common
townhome styles.

? Raised foundations -- Preserving another dominant characteristic of
home construction in the Heights, the new restrictions would require
either pier-and-beam construction, or other foundation construction that
would raise the bottom floor of the house at least 2 feet from the
ground. There are currently no townhome styles in Montrose or the West
End that have raised construction of any kind.

? Height restrictions -- The revisions would retain the current height
restriction of 40 feet, except that for lots of width greater than 50
feet, the limit would go up an additional foot for every 2 feet of
additional setback from the nearest lot line. The point of this is to
maintain the general Heights practice of no more than two stories in a
single family dwelling.

? Density and lot width -- The minimum lot size would be increased from
one residence per every 2,500 square feet to one per every 5,000 square
feet, and there would be a minimum frontage of 50 feet for each lot.
This would essentially establish a minimum lot size of 50 feet by 100
feet. This would represent a major break from the past. When the Heights
was originally laid out in the 1890s, lots were considered to be
generally no wider than 25 feet and houses occupied two or more of these
lots. However, throughout the area, examples abound of homes constructed
on 25-foot-wide lots only.

Recognizing that situation, there would be two important exceptions to
the new density and lot width requirements. First, garage apartments
would not be treated as "residences" for this purpose. Second, lots of
smaller frontage or size with existing houses as of the date of adoption
of the revisions or other fixed date (to be determined) would be
"grandfathered." That is, their size would be treated as conforming to
the deed restrictions.

A bracketed bill enacted by the Texas Legislature in 1999, applying only
to the Heights, created a means by which the deed restrictions could be
changed, setting the stage for these revisions. However, the alteration
process is something that in itself could take many months, according to
Tiller.

There are three methods by which the restrictions can be changed,
according to the bracketed law. First, a ballot could be mailed or
delivered to each qualified property owner, that is, those who have
already signed the deed restriction documents. Adoption of the revisions
would require an affirmative vote of 75 percent of those submitting a
ballot.

Second, a petition could be mailed or otherwise sent out to all
signed-on owners. Adoption would require the signature of 75 percent of
the owners.

The third, and as Tiller pointed out by far the easiest, method would be
to call a meeting of signed-on property owners. Adoption would require
the affirmative vote of 75 percent of those attending the meeting.

"Obviously what we would prefer to do is to hold the meeting because
it's the easiest thing to do," he said. "We would send out the notice to
everyone, see who shows up and pretty much do it all in one fell swoop.
Also, the group that would be most excited about the issue would be
those attending the meeting."

However, Tiller said that no one on the board or the association's Land
Use Committee, which originally drafted the proposed revisions, wants to
enact any change to any document without ensuring that the entire
community supports such a move.

"The number one priority is to build a consensus of support for the
proposals," he said. "We are in the public education phase of the
campaign. Before there's any kind of vote taken there's going to be a
mailer to everyone that we have on our list who own deed restricted
properties. That's going to be a hassle trying to track all those people
down, but we need to do that.

"The statute requires that notice be sent to all restricted property
owners. What steps do you need to take in order to satisfy that? We'll
take every practical step we can, and we'll record we did that. But
that's another technical issue we have to deal with.

"First and foremost, our goal is finding out whether or not we have the
consensus to do this."

Tiller did acknowledge the difficulty inherent in building that
consensus with the association's all-volunteer work force.

"With the petition it's my understanding you'd need 75 percent of
everyone," he said. "That appeals to me because that means we've got as
broad a consensus as possible. But that's a lot of work. With an
all-volunteer process that might be too much.

"In any event we'll be sending out a notice to everyone probably more
than once. The technical issues of presenting the proposals to the
neighborhood have to be worked out."

Protecting the historic quality of the neighborhood, Tiller said, is the
main goal of the restriction documents. As such, it coincides with a
similar effort to seek historic district status from the city of
Houston, an effort that still hasn't yet gotten off the ground in the
Houston Heights despite the awarding of the status to the neighboring
community of Norhill to the east. Tiller acknowledged the similarities
in goals, but noted that the deed restrictions have a much tighter
focus.

"The deed restrictions really apply to new construction rather than
preserving what's already on the ground," he said. "We could have
extended it to preserving issues as well, but we did not want to
overload this particular issue of stopping townhouse construction with
the preservation issue as well. It will be a similar process, building a
consensus and going to the homeowners to do that. Here initially we have
a much more limited group we have to address though, which is the
qualified property owners."

The Houston Heights Association board of directors will focus on this
issue at its next meeting, to be held at 6:30 p.m. Oct. 16, at the Fire
Station at the corner of West 12th and Yale.

For additional comment or more information about the deed restrictions,
check out a copy of the current document online at the Heights
Association's Web site at www.houstonheights.org/deedrestrictions.htm
<http://www.houstonheights.org/deedrestrictions.htm>. Also on the site
is a list of all deed restricted properties in the Heights. For more
information through non-computer means, call the Houston Heights
Association's main telephone number at 713-861-4002.

______________________________________________________________
Gordon Hagendorf
Kvaerner E&C
gordon.hagendorf@kvaerner.com

713 270-2450 Phone
713 270-2990 Fax


Ok.  I agree.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walton, Steve
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: WSCC BOT Meeting announcement - Dec 5-6 Phoenix

Jim,

	WSCC is voting on the formation of the WECC which will consolidated WSCC with the Western Regional Transmission Association and the Southwest Regional Transmission Association.  The Northwest Regional Transmission Association is likely to follow.  In order for this proposal to pass, 85% of the members must vote in favor and 90% of the control area MWs.  I think we should be there to vote for approval of the proposal.  In addition to combining the three (and possibly four) organizations, the change will alter the board make up, bringing independent members onto the board and allowing more latitude in membership.  The committees will be reevaluated as well and restructured over then next 2-3 years.

	Ray Alvarez is the member of the Board, so I talked to him about coverage.  He seemed to be uncertain about his availability.  I have an RTO West Congestion Management Meeting, where we are closing in on the final details of a financial rights model based on nodal pricing in real time.  I think I need to be there to keep the thing from getting fouled up.  Dave is close in Phoenix, so that was the reason that we tentatively made a reservation for him at the hotel.

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 7:21 AM
To:	Perrino, Dave; Alvarez, Ray; Walton, Steve
Subject:	RE: WSCC BOT Meeting announcement - Dec 5-6 Phoenix

Before we take this on, let's talk about how it fits into our priorities.  What will be happening that we must cover?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perrino, Dave
Sent:	Saturday, November 17, 2001 12:29 AM
To:	Alvarez, Ray; Walton, Steve; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: WSCC BOT Meeting announcement - Dec 5-6 Phoenix

Ray,

I will be happy to attend the WSCC BOT meeting in December.  I spoke to Steve about the issues to be covered, so we should be all set.  I will contact WSCC and register next week.

Kind Regards,

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 11:45 AM
To:	Perrino, Dave; Walton, Steve; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: WSCC BOT Meeting announcement - Dec 5-6 Phoenix

Dave, Steve and I talked and due to our schedules and distance from Phoenix, we think it would be most effective if you could represent the company at this BOT meeting.  This is assuming your schedule allows and Jim is on board with one of us attending.  It will be an important meeting with approval of WECC and next year's budget on the agenda.  I am making hotel reservations for you, since today is the deadline.  I think you also need to fill out a form for WSCC; Jenny Remington is the meeting planner.  I will send Dennis Eyre a delegation after I hear from you and Jim.  Ray

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perrino, Dave
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:20 PM
To:	Alvarez, Ray; Walton, Steve
Subject:	WSCC BOT Meeting announcement - Dec 5-6 Phoenix

FYI

 << File: DEC 2001 ANNOUNCE.doc >>


Please see the report on the World Services Congress.

I. Exhibit

The WTO Energy Services Coalition booth was a great opportunity to spread the
word on the goals of ESC.  We manned the booth during the Global Marketplace
- the name of the exhibition.  We distributed hundreds of the one-pager on
energy services, as well as the bound ESC briefing book.  In the time I was
at the booth there was a significant interest in the ESC.  Thanks to Marc
Eichman for dedicating significant time to managing the booth and to the
Enron graphics department for the outstanding display.  Below find a photo of
our display:

II.  Energy Services Panel: How the Energy Services Industry Can Use Trade
Negotiating to Secure and Expand Markets

Chair:
Terry Thorn,  Senior VP, Enron
Panelists:
John Easton, VP, Int'l Programs, Edison Electric Institute
Ian Miller, President, EDS Global Energy Business
Tim Richards, Sr. Manager, Int'l & Gov't Affairs, GE
Rachel Thompson, Administrator, Trade Directorate, OECD

Attendance at the panel was impressive with over 40 academic, government
(officials from the US, Norway, Portugal, Costa Rica, Holland, and Israel)
and private sector participants - in fact, we had to keep adding more chairs.

Terry Thorn began the panel with a history of energy services and the future
of the industry in a liberalized market.  Tim Richards provided a summary of
GE's view of energy services, outlined the current WTO commitments related to
energy services and discussed the issues of defining energy services,
identifying barriers, and setting a negotiating approach.  John Easton
outlined the debate on classification of energy services (goods vs.
services).  Ian Miller followed on the classification issue and applied it to
the EU (especially the German and French) liberalization experience.  Rachel
Thompson outlined her paper on trade in environmental services.  Rachel went
on to describe her lead in the OECD work program on trade in environmental
services with its focus on a win-win approach to trade and environment (this
is similar the win-win-win approach USTR has adopted).  The OECD work program
on environmental services could easily be adopted for energy services.

A lively discussion ensued on the following:  the link between environmental
and energy services, the NAFTA (negative list) negotiating strategies,
challenges of definition and classification, and e-commerce effect on energy
services.

Terry suggested that interested persons attending the panel provide him
contact information so we can create a global network on energy services.  We
can do this independently or through the CSI Global Services Network, which
is an informal, private sector-led on-line community dedicated to
liberalization of services (we can start a sector specific network).

Thanks to all the panelists for your time and talent in making the panel such
a success.

Please see Terry's and Tim's panel presentations attached below:

WSC Plenary

On Tuesday morning all the sector specific panelists chairs presented the
panel recommendation to the WSC Plenary.  Each chair was given 3 minutes to
present its recommendation and 4 Gov't representatives then responded.  The
recommendations will be collected and presented to the trade ministers in
advance of Seattle.

In addition to energy services, recommendations were delivered on e-commerce,
banking, insurance, entertainment, transportation, China, accounting, legal
services, and express delivery.

Terry Thorn delivered the ESC recommendation.  Attached below are Terry's
transcribed comments to the Plenary and the official panel recommendation.

The government responses were as follows:
Stuart Harbinson, Permanent Rep. of Hong Kong to the WTO and Chairman of the
WTO Council on Trade in Services:

Any guidelines on energy services must be general in nature.
Industry must move thoroughly make the case to its respective governments to
raise energy services as a priority.
 Gov't of Hong Kong will focus on Energy Services.

Joseph Papovich, Assistant USTR, Services, Investment & Intellectual
Property:
Energy Services are now in need of further analytical work supported by the
private sector.
Energy Services are similar to telecommunication and could be negotiated
accordingly.
Note of caution:  attempts to liberalize energy services will be derailed if
countries (often developing countries) view this as a mandate for gov'ts to
privatize energy assets.  Instead, it should encourage open and transparent
regulatory processes when privatization occurs.
U.S. supports including energy services in the services round.

Katsuhiro Nakagawa, Special Advisor, Ministry of Int'l Trade and Industry,
Japan:
Japan is currently deregulating its energy sector
 A "primitive" debate needs to occur on defining electricity as good vs.
service
Resource limitations and environmental aspects will be important to Japanese
negotiation.

In summary, I believe we made significant movement on mobilizing global
allies in our efforts.  Numerous colleagues commented on how impressed they
were in our raising energy services to such a level of interest in such a
short time and many acknowledged Joe Hillings' outstanding leadership of the
ESC.  Thanks to all for making the World Services Congress a success.

Please contact me with any questions or concerns.


the accounting department is making a wine - Cabernet - one of you come up
with a clever name please!

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Thanks.  Yes, I did know about the conference.  Ken has a copy of the study
and made reference to it several times during our visits to Sac. a couple of
weeks ago.  It's nice to occasionally see some rational thinking in
California.
I look forward to catching up with you when I get back to town.

<Carol_Benter@mckinsey.com> on 05/16/2001 09:27:00 AM
To: skean@enron.com
cc: Suzanne_Nimocks@mckinsey.com

Subject: Re: Kenneth Lay, Chairman Enron

----- Forwarded by Carol Benter/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY on 05/16/2001
09:32 AM -----

                     Suzanne

                     Nimocks             To:
Steve_Kean@enron.com
                     05/16/2001
cc:
                     06:39 AM            Subject:     Re: Kenneth Lay,
Chairman Enron

Hope you are keeping your head above water.  I wanted to let you know about
this request.  As you know, we did work for the Bay Area Council.  I don't
know if you will be joining Ken on this, but I did send you a copy of the
report a couple of weeks ago.  I did not send one to Ken, but will.  Let me
know if you need any additional copies.
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Nimocks/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY on 05/16/2001
06:41 AM -----

                     Lenny
Mendonca
                     05/15/2001          To:     "Alana
O'Brien"
                     07:22 PM
<Aobrien@bayareacouncil.org>
                                         cc:     Michael
Cunningham
                                          <Mcunningham@bayareacouncil.org>,
"Paul Lee
                                          (E-mail)" <Paul_Lee@mckinsey.com>,
"Sean
                                          Randolph (E-mail)"
<sean@bayeconfor.org>, "Tony
                                          Sugalski (E-mail)"
<Tony_Sugalski@mckinsey.com>,
                                          JACQUI MIRANDA, (bcc:
Suzanne

Nimocks/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY)
                                         Subject:     Re: Kenneth Lay,
Chairman Enron
                                          (Document link: Suzanne
Nimocks)

Good idea.  Jacqui knows my calendar

Lenny Mendonca
phone: 415-954-5161
fax 415-675-4990

                     "Alana
O'Brien"
                     <Aobrien@bayareac        To:     "Lenny Mendonca
(E-mail)"
                     ouncil.org>              <lenny_mendonca@mckinsey.com>,
"Tony Sugalski
                     05/15/2001 09:06         (E-mail)"
<Tony_Sugalski@mckinsey.com>, "Paul Lee
                     AM                       (E-mail)"
<Paul_Lee@mckinsey.com>
                                              cc:     "Sean Randolph
(E-mail)"
                                              <sean@bayeconfor.org>, Michael
Cunningham

<Mcunningham@bayareacouncil.org>
                                              Subject:     Kenneth Lay,
Chairman Enron

200 Pine Street, Suite 300 * San Francisco, CA 94104-2702
Phone (415) 981-6600 * Fax (415) 981-6408
Info@bayareacouncil.org

Lenny, Tony and Paul,

We have been contacted by Janet Yamane of Marathon Communications inviting
the Bay Area Council to sponsor a meeting with Bay Area  CEOs and Kenneth
Lay, Chairman of Enron, who will be visiting California this week to
discuss
energy and on.  She offered 5/17 am but added that if that wasn't available
that another time could be scheduled further on.  Sunne wanted your opinion
on this request.

Fred Furlong, Federal Reserve Bank is not available 5/17 am.  So that date
really won't work.  Please advise.

Alana

*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
Alana O'Brien
Vice President - Operations & Event Management
415-981-6600

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000 02:23 PM -----

	Kimberlee A Bennick
	12/22/2000 10:46 AM

		 To: catTaurus@aol.com, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Downey/HOU/EES@EES,
Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terrie Wheeler/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Marilyn
Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, htarran1@txu.com, mlashely@altra.com, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlo C
James/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CHRISTMAS CARD

Merry Christmas!!!!!

 - Jax Christmas Card 5.exe


Jeff,

It took a couple of weeks, but I found exactly what you wanted (I hope).  The CFO at Texas A&M was in administration at Michigan for about 30 yrs and had a "back door" we could go through to get the info.

Please let me know if you find the person you're looking for - that's all Bill Krumm asked for in return.

Thanks again for spending the time at Harvard and NYU last week.  I enjoyed getting to visit with you.

Billy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Krumm, Bill" <b-krumm@tamu.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	'billy@enron.com'
Subject:	UM Grads

Nice to talk to you and I look forward to meeting you when you are in
town....

Attaached is the file and if you can get me sex, degree and/or college, I
can have them all addded to the sort.

When an individual is selected, I will see what additional data I can get as
well including addresses and phone numbers.

Bill

 <<Enronumgrads.xls>>

 - Enronumgrads.xls


Tana,

My name is Sandra Vu with the EnronOnline call center and I have a customer
that is calling to request execute rights for US Gas Financial Basis Swap and
US Gas Financial Swap.  The company name is Coast Energy Group, a division of
Cornerstone Propane, L.P. and the individual requesting this change is Randy
Hughes one of their Master users on EnronOnline.  He also had a question as
to why the Coast Energy Canada, Inc. has execute rights for these products
but they do not.  Randy's phone number is 403-508-6734.  I can call him back
with the information or feel free to call the customer whichever is the
easiest for you.  Thank you for assistance in this matter.

Sandra Vu
EnronOnline
713-853-4357 (help)


Please add these dates and times to your calendars.....
Wed. Dec. 6th 49c4                             Noon - 2:00
Thurs. Dec. 7th 50 M Dining Room         11:30 - 1:30
Fri. Dec. 8th 50 Floor Board Room     11:30 - 1:30

Carolyn and Dwight Dawson of the Teamleadership Center are hosting 3 Team
Building sessions for everyone in Information & Records Management.  Lunch
will be provided each day.

The surveys we handed out to some of you are for those who missed our first
session with Dwight earlier this year.   Please have them back to me Friday
morning.   Thanks everyone!

Sandy x3-6766
PS - please pass the word to anyone not working on a PC ---Thanks


You didnt realize I was such a fucking bigshot did ya?  Check out the Sep 11
Fortune page 182 for more of the mojo.

"Andrew Thomas" <athomas1@dellnet.com> on 08/25/2000 02:02:59 PM
To: <Matthew.Arnold@enron.com>, <john.arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

"You can't turn away for a minute or you get picked  off."? Damn!!? I'm
minding my own business sitting on the dooker  reading Time, and sure enough
i get picked off!? Sheeeeeeeeeet.?  Friggin celebrities.? Can I have your
autograph?? :)?
?
Nice work, dood.
?
Fellas, I believe the new job is almost here--i was  told yesterday that I
got the job and am just waiting for the phone offer  (supposed to happen this
afternoon).? If it comes through, I'll be covering  the internet--should be
pretty solid.? Who knows, if EnronOnline gets spun  off (obv, not gonna
happen) I might even get to cover it...? what a  mock!? Anyway, thought I'd
drop you two a line.? Hope things are going  well...
?
can't wait for football...? lemme know when  you boys come back out here...
?
Andy
?


Please discuss this with Steve.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vanek, Darren
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:32 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: LG&E

I changed my mind. Let them come back to us before i do another worksheet.

-d

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	Vanek, Darren
Subject:	LG&E

 Please send a credit worksheet for Kentucky Utilities Company.   My contact says LG&E / KUC purchase and sell as the same entity?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


----- Forwarded by Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 02:41 PM -----

	Kaye Ellis
	09/18/2000 02:20 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria
Cruz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joya.Davis@enron.com@ECT, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny
Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina
Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Monterrey, Mexico Office has a Telephone Tie Line Now

As of today, the Monterrey, Mexico office has a telephone tie line.  Dial
7+152+extension you want to reach.  Please forward this information to any of
your assignments that call the Monterry office.


Thank you.  More light reading!

Kay


So hello,

What happened at rehearsal last night?  I did not make it, partly because I
was tired and I had several errands to take care of.  I needed to stop by
K-Mart and the grocery store last night to get things I really needed, and
just did not want to be out late.

Let me know!!!

Talk to you later.

P.S. is everthing else going okay?


Thanks Ed,  I was visiting with Nicor and they talked about some deal on the electric side and they acted as though I knew about it....so I thought I would just inquire.  I'll give her a call.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baughman, Edward D.
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:38 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Nicor

Terri Clynes is working with compression services (Jean Mrha's group) to convert compressors at one of Nicor's storage fields to  be electric driven. Terri can provide more info. on current status. Hope this helps.

Ed


Please stop all payroll deductions to registered and non-registered accounts in my name untill further notice.


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2000 01:51 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Linda J Noske                           04/27/2000 05:40 PM

To: BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION
cc:
Subject: ICE CREAM SOCIAL

We will be celebrating the April Birthdays with an ice cream social on
Monday, May 1st, at 3:00 p.m. in EB38C2.

I will send out a reminder on Monday.


Could you please send the documents to our office in Calgary.

Chris Dorland
Enron Canada Corp.
3500 Canterra Tower
400 - 3rd Ave. SW
Calgary, AB   Canada
T2P 4H2

Thanx,

Chris


Please call me.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 06/13/2001
04:49 PM ---------------------------
From: Jody Underwood on 06/13/2001 04:44 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MEMO


---------------------- Forwarded by Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2001
02:35 PM ---------------------------

Doug Miller
04/10/2001 07:01 PM
To: Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: schedule change

Juan,
Looking at my schedule, I could take off my days on Saturday the 21st and
Sunday the 22nd and work days on Thurs & Fri the 26 & 27.  I can't take
Monday the 23rd because there are only two of us on that night.  I would be
very happy to make this change.  Please let me know ASAP if this is
acceptable so I can make the appropriate plans.

Doug


TO: EGM Business Unit Heads
 Jennifer Fraser
 Eric Gonzales
 Gary Hickerson
 Larry Lawyer
 George McClellan
 John Nowlan
 Brent Price
 Dan Reck
 Per Sekse
 Mark Tawney

cc: Jeffrey Shankman
 Cathy Phillips
 Jennifer Burns
 Susan Lopez

Our relocation to the new building is fast approaching and there are several
important move related items that I would like to stress at this time.  I
would appreciate your cooperation with the key move issues that are outlined
below:

IMPORTANT - A special building tour has been scheduled for the EGM business
unit heads receiving this message.  Jeff and I, along with Bill Donovan,
would like to invite you to join us for a tour on this Friday morning, June
8th, from 8:30 to 9:30 a.m.  Even if you have already had an opportunity to
visit the new building, we think this would be a great opportunity for all of
us to see the space together and discuss any issues at that time.  Please
contact Cathy Phillips at X-36898 if you plan to attend the tour.
New building floor plan modification requests will no longer be accepted.
Any change requests that have already been received are currently being
considered and will be conveyed to the appropriate business unit head.
If vacant positions exist and they will be filled before the move on August
3rd, they need to be identified on all reports and floor plans with their
name, NH (for new hire) and an approximate hire date.  Example:  Bob Smith NH
7/25
Any space/move related questions or issues that may arise should be addressed
by Cathy Phillips.  Please do not contact Susan Lopez for any space related
issues.  Jeff and I have asked Cathy and Jennifer Burns to be responsible for
the allocation of space in the new building and they are keeping us well
informed as to the progress and any issues as they arise.
Jeff and I are very aware that space is very tight in the new building and we
will be addressing growth and additional space needs and issues in the near
future.
A limited number of Turret phones will be available in the new building.  The
Turret phones will be assigned to traders and their assistants only.
Everyone else on the floor will receive a new upgraded version of the Lucent
phone (with the existing phone numbers).  Please contact Jennifer Burns if
you have any questions or issues related to phones.
All private team rooms, offices and conference rooms have been assigned and
there are no more available for assignment to the individual groups or
people.  On the 3rd floor we will have the following public conference space
available by making reservations (specific scheduling details to follow
later):
1 Mega conference room
1 Large conference room with videoconference capabilities
1 Large conference room - no videoconference
3 Team rooms
File space on the floor is being upgraded and allocations of file space will
be made for each group.  Every attempt is being made to have the assigned
file space as close to each individual group as possible.
At this time, details related to food deliveries and distribution have not
been resolved.  Your patience and flexibility with all food related issues
will be appreciated.  It is highly probable that food service in the new
building will be very difficult at first and as we get closer to the move
date, more information will be provided related to food service, deliveries
and distribution.
Since Jeff and I both already keep Cathy and Jennifer very busy, we would
appreciate it if you would send all your comments, questions, or issues to
them via e-mail.  They have agreed to make themselves available every Monday
at 4:30 p.m. to meet with anyone to discuss their questions.  Please make
arrangements with them directly to meet regarding your issues.
There will be a 60 day freeze on any building changes once we move into the
new building.

I understand that this is a difficult process and that there are a lot of
questions and issues, but Jeff and I are convinced that this will be great
and everything will work out in time.  Thank you for your cooperation and
assistance in making this transition to the new building as smooth as
possible.

Mike


This is all I've received on this today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/05/2000 04:14
PM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/05/2000 04:03:29 PM
To: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: areynaud@coral-energy.com, dwhaley@coral-energy.com,
jlshepherd@coral-energy.com

Subject: Revised GE Acknowledgement Letter

Attached is a revised draft of the acknowledgement letter which Tejas
would require from GE as a condition to closing.  The letter has been
revised to incorporate the substance of the changes which Don and I
discussed with Ben Jacoby this morning.  Additional changes to the
letter may be needed after Coral has seen and reviewed the Facility
Agreement.

 - 5wk8803_.DOC


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2001 03:28 PM -----

	David.Simpson.enronXgate@enron.com 06/12/2001 07:11 AM 	   To: IMCEANOTES-Mark+20Taylor+20+28Vice+20President+20and+20General+20Counsel+29+40ENRON@ENRON.com  cc:   Subject: RE: PLEASE READ

I have one, it has about $100 in it and I am not currently doing any
trading at the moment.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON
             [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

              On Behalf Of Mark Taylor (Vice President and General Counsel)
             @ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:43 PM
   To:     NYMEX Hedge Exemption List@ENRON
   Subject:  PLEASE READ

   To:                                        Department:    ENA Legal

   From:        Mark Taylor                        Date:     May 11, 2001
           Vice President and General Counsel

   Subject:     Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption
   Applications

   We  are  in  the  process  of  preparing applications for position limit
   exemptions  for  ENA's  NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These
   applications require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees,
   owners,  or agents have a power of attorney, control or have a financial
   interest  in any related commodity future(s) account either individually
   or acting with another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

   Please   direct   any   responses  to  my  paralegal,  Tana  Jones,  via
   intercompany  email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business
   on  June  15,  2001 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a
   financial  interest  in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA
   or other trading affiliate account).

   IF  YOU  DO  NOT  HAVE  A  COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO
   RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST.


Attached is a clean and redlined version of the referenced agreement.  I will forward Exhibit A to the agreement shortly.  Please review and let me know if you have any questions.


That is fine.  Mom had said that you wanted me to go through Bob Dunn for my
mortgage.  Can you give more info?
-e

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 02/07/2001 11:05:26 AM
To: eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Good morning Son.I have a favor to ask. Next time  you are @ your bank,
please get $1000 cash, mostly 100's. I will give you a  check for same. Same
old problem. No local bank account. If this is a problem  let me know.
Thanks-Dad


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 09:27 AM -----

	Shari Stack
	07/31/2000 09:07 AM

		 To: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Associates

FYI >>>>>

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 09:07 AM -----

	Rogelio L?pez Velarde <rlopezv@lvha.com.mx>
	07/28/2000 07:45 PM
	Please respond to Rogelio L?pez Velarde

		 To: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Roy Howell"
<Roy_Howell@ei.enron.com>, "Robert M Sutter"
<Robert_M_Sutter.EES@ei.enron.com>, "Rafael Hernandez" <rhernand@enron.com>,
Matt.Maxwell@enron.com, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark.Dobler@enron.com, "Lisa
Polk" <lpolk@enron.com>, "Leslie Hiltabrand" <lhiltabr@enron.com>, "Leslie A
Ward" <lward2@enron.com>, Leasa L?pez <llopez3@enron.com>, "Kurt Wangenheim"
<kwangenh@enron.com>, "Keneth Krasny" <kkrasny@enron.com>, "Karen Lynn
Harrison" <kharris2@enron.com>, "Joe Hartsoe" <Joe_Hartsoe@ect.enron.com>,
"Jeffrey K Fischer" <jfischer@enron.com>, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, "James
Harris" <James.Harris@enron.com>, "Deborah Rogers"
<Deborah_Rogers@ei.enron.com>, "Debbie Lucadou" <Debbie.Lucadou@enron.com>,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Annamaria Bosley" <abosley@enron.com>,
Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Associates

Please see attachment.

The information contained herein may be confidential and/or privileged. This
information is intended to be reviewed only by the individual or the entity
to which is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail message is not the
intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail
message or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender
and delete this message from your system.
 - att1.htm
 - curricula new associates.doc


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


numero dos
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/11/2000 02:02
PM ---------------------------

"Thomas Mueller" <tmueller@rhm.com.mx> on 02/10/2000 12:59:48 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Tribasa 3

 Kay,

as dicussed yesterday, attached please find a draft of the letter to AI.

Regards
Thomas

 - 7SK01!1.DOC


Dear Friends, Family and Wedding Party,
I am attaching a tentative itinerary for the wedding
weekend. Some of the times for transportation and hair
appointments may change as we finalize the schedules,
but for the most part, this should help you plan your
weekend.
We do not have a golf outing planned but I am assured
the Four Seasons and Hilton can help arrange golf
groups for wedding guests.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any
questions!
All our love,
Liz and Jose Luis

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
 - Itinerary of Events.doc


all curves are for physical deals as of 2/13

 basis curves :

CHI/N/BORDER
NGI/CHIGATE

Index

Peoples

NGI/CHI/PEOPLE
CHI/N/BORDER

NORTH SHORE

NGI/CHI/WILLCO
NGI/CHIGATE

I realize it may be difficult to get each of these but anything you could
get would be appreciated.

thanks

Sean

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Sean Doherty
wk 212 773 8195
fax 212 773 5481
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

______________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it
from your computer.  Thank you.  Ernst & Young LLP


I realize this is late notice, but it just occurred to me that I never
discussed my Christmas vacation plans with you when I transferred into
Trading. I have a family trip planned and paid for, so I hope it won't cause
too much chaos if I'm gone. I understand the tendency for people to feel lost
and helpless without me.

I'm supposed to be in California with my dad on Dec. 22, then in Mexico with
my mom from Dec. 26 to Jan. 2. So I basically need to miss four days of work.
Again, I'm sorry to bring this to you so late, and I'd be glad to do any
amount of work before or after, or even spend my holiday entering deals on
the computer in some exotic Central American internet cafe. I've heard
they're great places to rage.

We can discuss the logistics when you're back in the office. And by the way,
the flame in this e-mail does not indicate anger, but rather is meant to be a
festive, joyous, holiday-time explosion.

Kate


Theresa,

My apologies, but I found after I sent my modified file to you that the CIG
variable rate did not reflect the surcharges.  I will revise the file and
send it to you.

John

John A. Cogan

The Johnco Group, LLC
3629 Lake Kristin Drive
Gretna, LA 70056
(504) 392-7557   Home/Office
(504) 491-2874   Cell
(208) 730-4713   Fax


Start Date: 3/12/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031222.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:  49.81 / Final:  49.78)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/12/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000 10:16 AM -----

	"MICHAEL W E DIDRIKSEN" <MDIDRIKSEN@LLGM.COM>
	12/27/2000 05:42 PM

		 To: <elizabeth.sager@enron.com>, <msmith1@enron.com>
		 cc: "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
		 Subject: Re: Settlement Agreement re PGE

Elizabeth and Mike:

Attached are a clean and a blackline of a revised version of the assignment
agreement between EEMC and EPMI, incorporating some comments we have received
over the past several days.  Please distribute as appropriate.  If you have
any questions, please call me at the number listed below.

Mike

_____________________________________________________________
NOTICE:  This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments, and notify me by return mail, e-mail or at (212)424-8352.  The
unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail,
including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Michael Didriksen
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
125 West 55th Street
New York, NY  10019
(212)424-8352
fax:  (212)424-8500
mdidriksen@llgm.com

 - Assignment and Assumption Agreement 12-27.doc
 - Assignment and Assumption Agreement redline 12-27.rtf


Daren,

Please read this memo and the one dated 2/21/01 from Vance.  He told me all
new production should be entered at IFHSC.  The deal in question is 634075.
Do you want it changed to Gas Daily?  Please advise.  Thanks.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 11:02
AM ---------------------------
From: Vance L Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 02:24 PM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Melissa
Graves/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: FIRST DELIVERY - RODESSA OPERATING CO.

Tom/Bob,

The following production is now on-line and a ticket should be created and
entered into sitara based on the following:

Counterparty   Meter   Volumes  Price    Period  Global No.
HESCO Gathering Co., LLC 9876   85mmbtu/d  100% GD less $0.17  3/13 - 3/31
96057368

FYI, Susan will create and submit a committed reserves firm ticket for the
remaining term of the deal beginning with the month of April.  Additionally,
this is a Producer Svcs. deal and should be tracked in the IM Wellhead
portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Buckley, Esther
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:14 PM
To: Carriere, Molly; Cernosek, Clem; Consemiu, Donna; Cook, Robert; Camp,
Howard; Hesse, Lisa; Hlavaty, Nathan; Wayne E Lightfoot/HOU/ECT@ENRON; McKay,
James; Smith, Mary; Schneider, Steve HPL; Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ENRON;
Walters, Michael; Zivley, Jill; Johnson, Mary Jo; Wynne, Rita; Allen, Lauri;
Jones, Cheryl; Hansen, Reid; Giron, Darron; Winfree, O'Neal; Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Bryan, Gary; Hanks, Gary; Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Baumbach, David;
Cotten, Robert; Riley, Brian; Austin, Jeff; Hakemack, Cynthia; Kenne, Dawn;
Csikos, Lisa; Fosdick, J R; Rodriguez, Carlos; Gomes, Stephanie; Clynes, Pat;
Acton, Tom; Walker, Robert; Weissman, George; Harris, JoAnne; Sweeney,
Christy; Tisdale, Earl; Farmer, Daren
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - RODESSA OPERATING CO.

See attached letter