The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread32.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread32.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread32.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack32.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack32.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Susan, looks great. I have a few suggestions ; simple words and
format. We can review tommorrow. The only area I saw that we did
not address, I think we should is the Item 7 (secondary transmission)
market. The Commission is focused on this area of in state develop
ment, we should take advantage.  I will be faxing copies of
previow testimony for your background and use in our testimony.

Thx, Mark IGS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Susan.Scott@enron.com [mailto:Susan.Scott@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 4:02 PM
> To: mbaldwin@igservice.com
> Cc: Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com
> Subject: revised testimony
>
>
> OK, this is starting to take shape.  I handed off a copy to Jeff today;
> he'll review it this evening.  Your comments are welcome at any
> time.  I'll
> be in all day tomorrow; I am planning to be out of the office Friday but
> may need to come in early a.m. to put the finishing touches on the 1st
> draft we send to the group.  To the extent you can provide testimony
> references before that time, that would be great.
>
> (See attached file: JCF direct testimony.doc)
>
> Re. today's e-mails from the other parties:  We're OK with PG&E's addition
> to the settlement.  I am not wild about it since it isn't exactly
> consistent with how other points are treated.  But, this is a settlement
> after all.  And I think it is better to do what we can to get PG&E on
> board.  I'll send an e-mail out tomorrow once we see who else is on the
> bandwagon.
>
> On Kern's proposal:  Subject to seeing something in writing, Transwestern
> will agree to the proposal I believe you and Jeff discussed yesterday.  We
> will at least agree not to oppose Kern, or to support them on a limited
> basis.  Give me a call tomorrow (713-853-0596) and let's make sure we're
> all on the same page (Dasovich is going to call you also).
>
> Muchas gracias y hasta manana.
>
> S.


FYI

Press Release

California ISO Offers Market Stabilization Proposal

Calls for Forum for Reaching Consensus on Market Power Mitigation

FOLSOM, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 20, 2000--Hoping to trigger consensus
building that will lead to solutions to volatile energy prices, the
California Independent System Operator (California ISO) filed a Market
Stabilization Proposal with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
today, Friday, Oct. 20, 2000.

The plan was unveiled during a news conference at the ISO's Folsom Control
Center this morning. California ISO CEO Terry Winter described the plan as a
discussion platform -- a document not etched in stone but rather introduced
as a means for putting the brakes on market prices and finding long-term
solutions that will protect consumers from high bills while stimulating new
investment in power plants.

The California ISO is asking FERC to consider the following regulatory steps:

Institute Payment Cap of $100 in all markets with the following exemptions:
Generators that can prove they will lose money if capped on that rate
Generators that contract 70 percent of their supply to serve California
customers
Renewable generation -- Generation facilities less than 50 megawatts -- New
power plants -- Imported power
The existing $250 per megawatt hour price cap would still exist and serve as
the absolute price ceiling for suppliers exempt from the $100 payment cap.

``We cannot simply apply a short-term patch for market power, without also
addressing the underlying problems causing sky-high prices,'' said California
ISO CEO Terry Winter. ``Consumers have little control over how they can
respond to high prices. There are traffic jams on the transmission systems
that keep us from moving electricity efficiently around the state, not to
mention the fact there are not enough megawatts to meet the needs of
consumers. And, the lack of forward contracting scheduling means the
California ISO is making up for huge shortfalls ten minutes before the power
is consumed.''

Along with providing the incentive for generators (sellers) to sign formal
contracts, the California ISO also recommends requiring utilities (buyers) to
contract for 85 percent of their customer requirement for power in advance of
when it's needed.

The lack of adequate forward contracting also adds to an operational problem
facing the ISO -- the fact that 20-30 percent of total consumption is
frequently bought and sold in the ISO's Real-Time Market, which was designed
to handle only five percent of the electricity traded in wholesale markets.
This problem -- known as under-scheduling -- is also addressed in the ISO's
filing by a real-time trading charge.

``Because of the visibility of the ISO's markets -- the fact that we are so
public -- and as a result of the distortion of the intended market design,
the ISO has been called upon to take on responsibilities it was never
intended to handle,'' said Winter. ``This proposal would take the ISO back to
its original mission of operating the markets of last resort, allowing ISO
operators to focus on maintaining reliability of the power grid.''

The California ISO is chartered by the state to manage the flow of
electricity along the long-distance, high-voltage power lines that make up
the bulk of California's transmission systems. The not-for-profit public
benefit corporation assumed the responsibility in March 1998 when California
opened its energy markets to competition and the state's investor-owned
utilities turned their private transmission power lines over the California
ISO to manage. The mission of the California ISO is to safeguard the reliable
delivery of electricity and ensure equal access to an open-market electron
highway that spans 12,500 circuit miles.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Contact:

     California ISO
     Patrick Dorinson, 888/516-NEWS


Stinson,

Cantekin has an interesting background. Please, take a look at his resume.
It's on his web-site. Project on radio and TV broadband.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2000
12:30 PM ---------------------------

"Cantekin Dincerler" <cantekin@mail.utexas.edu> on 03/28/2000 11:48:53 AM
Please respond to cantekin@mail.utexas.edu
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: summer internship

Hi Vince,

I am writing you at this time to inquire as to the potential of renewing my
internship at Enron for the Summer of 2000.

While the date of my request is later than I would have wished, the reason
is that I had originally planned to go back to Turkey this summer and get
my mandatory military duty done. However, I now realize I can put it off to
a further date. That left me wondering if you believe there is a project
that I can get involved in this summer and be useful. If that were the
case, I would be more than happy to postpone my military duty and spend the
summer with the research group. I discussed this with Dr. Ronn, and he is
very supportive of this idea.

I apologize again for bringing up this issue late, and look forward to
hearing from you.

Best regards,

 ---------oOOo-----oOOo----------
Cantekin Dincerler

Doctoral Candidate
The University of Texas at Austin
Graduate School of Business
Department of Finance
office: (512) 471-1676
fax   : (512) 471-5073
home  : (512) 472-5356
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cantekin
 -------------oooO-----Oooo----------


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000 11:27 AM
---------------------------

"Lyons, Maureen (CICG - Equity Linked Capital Markets)"
<malyons@exchange.ml.com> on 08/09/2000 04:17:50 PM
To: "'jeff.nogid@enron.com'" <jeff.nogid@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: ENE- Forward Termsheet and Forward Confirmation Template

Hi Jeff,

Per our conversation this afternoon, I have attached the draft forward
purchase termsheet and forward transaction confirmation template for your
review.  Please give us a call to discuss terminating the Total Return Swap
as of Friday, 08/04/2000, and entering into a forward purchase contract at
your earliest convenience.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us
know.  We are looking forward to speaking with you soon!

 <<ENE-Forward-Draft termsheet.doc>>
<<Forward-Confirmation-Template-8-9.doc>>

Thank you,
Maureen Lyons
Merrill Lynch
Equity Linked Capital Markets
212-449-6763 (T)
212-738-1069 (F)

Maureen Lyons
Merrill Lynch
Equity Linked Capital Markets
212-449-6763 (T)
212-738-1069 (F)

 - ENE-Forward-Draft termsheet.doc
 - Forward-Confirmation-Template-8-9.doc


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/26/2000 04:09 PM
-----

	Rob Bradley@ENRON
	10/26/2000 03:39 PM

		 To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New EIA Electricity Demand Growth Estimate: 3.1% growth in 1999

Attached is a press release from the DOE's Energy Information
Administration announcing a 3.1% increase in power generation last year.

This is the 3rd increase in the 1999 electric generation estimate from EIA.
The first estimate was 1% growth from 1998, the second 1.6%, and the third is
3.1%.  The 1999 increase comes on top of a 1998 increase of 3.5%--a year that
some attributed solely to the El Nino warming spike.  Even if so, 1998 is now
normalized by the 1999 jump.

Pancaking 3-4% growth years is really phenomenal, especially when the EIA
forecast is around 1.5% per year growth.

Something is going on with electricity demand, and Mark Mills'
Internet-electron thesis is looking better and better.

Whatever occurs with 2000 demand and generation, some consumption (phantom
generation) has been lost in California from the shortages.  Only with an
open production (and transmission) market do we know how much demand is
really growing.

- Rob

Energy Information Administration
EIA Reports
U.S. Department of Energy
Washington, DC  20585

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OCTOBER 26, 2000

    Nonutility Net Generation Up 37 Percent in 1999

Net generation of electricity from nonutility (nonregulated)
generators increased 37 percent in 1999, advancing from
11 percent to 15 percent of total net electricity generation
according to information released today by the Energy
Information Administration in "Electric Power Annual 1999
Volume II" (see Figure).  Electric utilities (regulated
generators) and nonutility generators combined to produce a
record 3.7 trillion kilowatthours in 1999, a 3.1 percent
increase over 1998.

The shift in electricity generation from regulated to
nonregulated generators was driven largely by State-level
restructuring legislation which requires or encourages
divestiture of a utility's generating assets.  In 1999,
50,884 megawatts of electricity generating capability was
sold by utilities to nonutilities.  In addition to the
purchases of generating assets from utilities, nonutility
companies added 6,769 megawatts of new capability, compared
with the 3,689 megawatts added by utilities.

Additional highlights from the report include:

*  Over half (54 percent) of the nonutility net generation
   of nearly 0.6 trillion kilowatthours was from gas.  Coal,
   however, increased its share of nonutility net generation
   to almost 23 percent in 1999 from 16 percent in 1998,
   primarily as a result of recent purchases of coal-fired
   generating capability from utilities.  More detailed data
   on nonutility capability will be available later this
   month with the release of "Inventory of Nonutility
   Electric Power Plants in the United States 1999."  For
   detailed utility capability data, see "Inventory of
   Electric Utility Power Plants in the United States 1999"
   at:
   http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/ipp/ipp99_sum.html

*  Although there was a 3.1 percent increase in net
   electricity generation, utility and nonutility emissions
   of sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide were up 2.1 percent
   and 3.0 percent, respectively, as most new generating
   capability is gas-fired.  Nitrogen oxide emissions remained
   unchanged from the 1998 level.

"Electric Power Annual 1999 Volume II" is available on EIA's
Internet site at:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epav2/epav2_sum.html
Printed copies of the report will be available in November
from the U.S. Government Printing Office, 202/512-1800 or
through EIA's National Energy Information Center, 202/586-8800.
The figure referenced above may be viewed along with this
press release on EIA's Web Site or can be requested from EIA's
Press Contact.

**************************************************************
The report described in this press release was prepared by the
Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical
and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy.
The information contained in the report and the press release
should be attributed to the Energy Information Administration
and should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any
policy position of the Department of Energy or any other
organization.
**************************************************************

EIA Program Contact: Robert Schnapp,  202/426-1211
EIA Press Contact:
National Energy Information Center, 202/586-8800

EIA-2000-19
--------------------------  To Unsubscribe  -----------------------------
You are currently subscribed to eiapr as: [rbradle@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-eiapr-111608L@tonto.eia.doe.gov.
Please do not use the reply button.


? It appears very likely that SB 78XX will be the lead vehicle for the MOU in
the working group discussions and that AB 82XX will move closer to SB 78XX.
(Note: AB 50XX appears to have been dropped by Wright so that he could keep
his Energy Committee chairmanship; he was being heavily criticized for
opposing the Assembly leadership with his bill.)

? The two main points of contention between SB 78XX and AB 82XX appear to be
the renewables portfolio (SB 78XX's version is thought of as more reasonable)
and the provisions for a PUC reasonableness review of the long-term
contracts.  SB 82XX prohibits a reasonableness review, and SoCal is pushing
for this language to be incorporated into SB 78XX.  This language was also in
the original MOU between SoCal and the governor.


Just wanted to keep everyone on point in terms of the importance and
expectations of getting this King Ranch issue cleaned up for the prior months
and correct on a go forward basis.  I spoke with Brenda on Friday to give her
an update of our progress and one of the things that she stressed and wanted
passed on to the team was the expectations that King Ranch would be clean
(scheduled and allocated correctly)  for March and foward.  As of Thursday
night's   P &L calc., unaccounted for March 2000 on Texas was a little over
400,000 mmbtus.  As you all know, that number is way too high and should be a
lot lower (on a bad month, no more than 100,000 mmbuts).  Hopefully, if King
Ranch is the part of the problem for  March and we get these issues resolved,
March will not be an issue.  I appreciate everyone's committment so far and
hopefully we can apply this team concept in the future to prevent crisis
modes like this from here on out.  If anyone has questions or concerns,
please do not hesitate to let me know.  Thanks!

Howard B Camp
03/20/2000 08:46 AM
To: Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem
Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPLR Liquids / Humble Gas Pipeline

We need to get together this afternoon at 2:00 PM in room 3745 to discuss how
we will schedule and allocate the HPLR Liquids coming into Humble Gas
Pipeline at meter 8793.  Karry, it is my understanding that you do not want
an intercompany sale from HPLR Liquids to HPLC at this point.   How do you
plan to get this gas to King Ranch since HPLR Liquids does not have a
transport on Humble?

Daren, the intercompany HPLC purchase  is how it is set up currently in MOPS.

Robert, since Stella is out, we will need someone to represent Logistics.

HC


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	    [IMAGE]    Quote & 3-Point ViewProfile & FundamentalsKey RatiosAnalyst InfoEarnings EstimatesInsider TradingInteractive Graph ToolGraphs In BulkDiscussionRecommendationsNews Articles   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	 Recommend  	 	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	   kensey's RecommendList  	   Reply  	   Unsubscribe  	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	DO NOT reply  to this email. Replies should be made via the underlined "Reply" link above.	[IMAGE]

	'kensey' has removed _XAU.X (Doink) at Nov 21 2001  2:38PM
	Gold (INDE:_XAU.X)   Symbol  Last  Time  Change  High  Low  Volume  _XAU.X   50.30   2:20PM  -0.04  50.84  49.61  0  Community Take   21 Long / 2 Short

	[IMAGE]
	 'kensey' said:
	 Wed Nov 21 11:24:11 2001   take profits +8 percent _XAU.X short as the stochastic lines have completed navigation from overbought to oversold.  given that _XAU has essentially vibrated more than it has surfed, flat seems the way to pump the board.   _XAU not out of the woods let by any stretch having taken out key support at 52.  52 figured as support in july, early aug, mid oct and gets breached here.  so, if _XAU traces back up to near 52 level it would be one of the best short opps on gold offered in many moons.    as far as potentials for tonights NBA matchups on sportsbook.com, what stands out is the under @196 boston/atlanta in a 2 Team parlay with the under @190 memphis/cleveland.  $100 pays $260.  one might also take boston and give 8 points on a straight wager given that atlanta has lost its last 21 road games in a row.  the pistons have been on a roll.  tempting are those 7 1/2 points being offered ! against philly.   recommended _XAU.X Short on Nov 2 2001 when it was trading at 54 1/2. Since then it's gone down 8.28% to 50 1/8.   kensey
	 Click here  to  see the full recommendation with annotated graph

	[IMAGE]
	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     kensey's RecommendList       Reply      Unsubscribe   [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 ClearStation is not an investment advisory service,  nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and  does not purport to tell or suggest which securities  members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should  always check with their licensed financial advisor  and their tax advisor to determine the suitability of  any investment.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank. E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. and E*TRADE Bank are wholly-owned subsidiaries of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. E*TRADE Bank deposits are insured up  to $100,000 by the FDIC. E*TRADE Bank and E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.  E*TRADE brokerage accounts are maintained by E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. Products offered by E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or  obligations of E*TRADE Bank, are subject to investment  risk, including possible loss of principal invested. ClearStation is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc.  E*TRADE is a registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. Member NASD/SIPC.  Copyright (c) 2000.  ClearStation , Inc. All rights reserved.

																	 Question?  Get it answered!   Comments? Talk to us!  Copyright  ? 1998-2000 ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademark  Notice  Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for Nasdaq, 20 minutes otherwise.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of E*TRADE Group, Inc.
[IMAGE]	  About Us     	I	 Help     	I	 Feedback     	I	 Member  Agreement     	I	 Privacy  Statement    	I	 Advertise     	I	 Jobs     	I	Join      	I	FAQ


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 08:01 AM -----

	Jon Chapman
	11/14/2000 03:42 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Good luck America

And so it goes on .........
---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Chapman/LON/ECT on 14/11/2000 09:44
---------------------------

David_Davies@chubb.com.au on 14/11/2000 05:21:06
To: tim@boomad.com.au, Jon.Chapman@enron.com, mmdalyell@statestreet.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Good luck America

David Davies
National Manager - Chubb Traffic Services
02 9930 4318 / 0401 77 66 18

---------------------- Forwarded by David Davies/NSW/Chubb on 14/11/2000
03:22 PM ---------------------------

Tony Ayers <tony@secureparking.com.au> on 14/11/2000 04:15:44 PM

To:   "David Davies (E-mail)" <David_Davies@chubb.com.au>, "Mark Langan
      (E-mail)" <mlangan@candlerecruit.com>, "Patrick O'Callaghan (E-mail)"
      <patricko@cityford.com.au>, "Tony Ayers (E-mail)"
      <aayers@ozemail.com.au>
cc:

Subject:  FW: Good luck America

-----Original Message-----
From:     paul.g.smith@customs.gov.au <mailto:paul.g.smith@customs.gov.au>
[SMTP:paul.g.smith@customs.gov.au]
<mailto:[SMTP:paul.g.smith@customs.gov.au]>
Sent:     Tuesday, 14 November 2000 15:13
To:  sculleys@flex.com.au; <mailto:sculleys@flex.com.au;>
tony@secureparking.com.au; <mailto:tony@secureparking.com.au;>
wise@goldn.com.au; <mailto:wise@goldn.com.au;>  anderson@fan.net.au
<mailto:anderson@fan.net.au>
Subject:  FW: Good luck America

These are some quotes attributed to the would be American President
George
Bush
Perhaps this is how upper management speak?
Subject:  Good luck America....

"The vast majority of our imports come from outside the country."
....George W. Bush, Jr.
"If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure."
....George W. Bush, Jr.

"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and
child."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"Welcome to Mrs. Bush, and my fellow astronauts."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.

"Mars is essentially in the same orbit...Mars is somewhat the same
distance from the Sun, which is very important.
We have seen pictures where there are canals, we believe, and water. If
there is water, that means there is oxygen.
If oxygen, that means we can breathe."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 8/11/94
"The Holocaust was an obscene period in our nation's history. I mean in
this century's history.  But we all lived in this century. I didn't live
in this century."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/15/95
"I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and
democracy - but that could change."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 5/22/98
"One word sums up probably the responsibility of any Governor, and that
one word is 'to be prepared'."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 12/6/93
"Verbosity leads to unclear, inarticulate things."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 11/30/96

"I have made good judgments in the past. I have made good judgments in
the future."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"The future will be better tomorrow."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.

"We're going to have the best educated American people in the world."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/21/97
"People that are really very weird can get into sensitive positions and
have a tremendous impact on history."
....Governor George W. Bush.
"I stand by all the misstatements that I've made."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr. to Sam Donaldson, 8/17/93
"We have a firm commitment to NATO, we are a part of NATO. We have a
firm commitment to Europe. We are a part of Europe." ....Governor George
W. Bush, Jr.
"Public speaking is very easy."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr. to reporters in 10/9
"I am not part of the problem. I am a Republican"
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.

"A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the
polls."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr
"When I have been asked who caused the riots and the killing in LA, my
answer has been direct & simple Who is to blame for the riots? The
rioters are to blame. Who is to blame for the killings? The killers are
to blame."
....George W. Bush, Jr.
"Illegitimacy is something we should talk about in terms of not having
it."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 5/20/96
"We are ready for any unforeseen event that may or may not occur."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/22/97
"For NASA, space is still a high priority."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/5/93

"Quite frankly, teachers are the only profession that teach our
children."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr., 9/18/95
"The American people would not want to know of any misquotes that
George Bush may or may not make."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"We're all capable of mistakes, but I do not care to enlighten you on
the mistakes we may or may not have made."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"It isn't pollution that's harming the environment. It's the impurities
in our air and water that are doing it."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
....Governor George W. Bush, Jr.

*************************************************************
This email and any files attached are considered
confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom this email is addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify :
         ( itsupport@chubb.com.au )
This footnote also confirms that the above email has been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
*************************************************************


Craig:
Please take me off of this list as I am on maternity leave.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Craig Clark
	07/28/00 11:05 AM

		 To: amanda.angelini@ssmb.com
		 cc: Doug McDowell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ryan
Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Scardino/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gareth
Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clint Walden/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kevin D
Jordan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent Vasconcellos/Corp/Enron@ENRON, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Fcochran@velaw.com
		 Subject: Kahuna (Yosemite 3) Prepay Working ist

Amanda,

Attached and below is the email distribution list for the Kahuna (Yosemite 3)
prepay docs.  All are waiting with baited breath for the first set!

Doug McDowell  doug.mcdowell@enron.com
Craig Clark   craig.clark@enron.com
Ryan Siurek   ryan.siurek@enron.com
Kimberly Scardino  Kimberly.r.Scardino@us.arthurandersen.com
Gareth Bahlmann   gareth.bahlmann@enron.com
Clint Walden   clint.walden@enron.com
Kevin D Jordan   kevin.d.jordan@enron.com
Mark Taylor   mark.taylor@enron.com
Carol St Clair   carol.stclair@enron.com
Brent Vasconcellos   brent.vasconcellos@enron.com
AnnMarie Tiller   annmarie.tiller@enron.com
Tres Cochran  Fcochran@velaw.com

If any additions or deletions are required, please advise me.
Thanks
Craig Clark
713 853 5862


I have no fears...the bet stands.

You should get to know Vivian Krauchek, with Dynegy Canada Gas Marketing Ltd..  I'd like to!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 2:16 PM
To:	Lisk, Daniel
Subject:

i will let you out of the bet for $20


i am in.  do you need anyone else to play b/c chad wants to play if we have
room.  we could always use another pass rusher.


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	    [IMAGE]    Quote & 3-Point ViewProfile & FundamentalsKey RatiosAnalyst InfoEarnings EstimatesInsider TradingInteractive Graph ToolGraphs In BulkDiscussionRecommendationsNews Articles   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	 Recommend  	 	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	   kensey's RecommendList  	   Reply  	   Unsubscribe  	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	DO NOT reply  to this email. Replies should be made via the underlined "Reply" link above.	[IMAGE]

	'kensey' has recommended ATVI (Short) at Oct 23 2001  8:05AM
	Activision Inc (NASDAQ:ATVI)   Symbol  Last  Time  Change  High  Low  Volume  ATVI   38.72  11:54AM  2.06  38.75  36.75  994,700  Community Take   30 Long / 9 Short

	[IMAGE]
	 'kensey' said:
	 Tue Oct 23 08:04:00 2001   near resistance and overbought.  cover north of 38.   kensey
	 Click here  to  see the full recommendation with annotated graph

	[IMAGE]
	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     kensey's RecommendList       Reply      Unsubscribe   [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 ClearStation is not an investment advisory service,  nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and  does not purport to tell or suggest which securities  members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should  always check with their licensed financial advisor  and their tax advisor to determine the suitability of  any investment.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank. E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. and E*TRADE Bank are wholly-owned subsidiaries of  E*TRADE Group, Inc. E*TRADE Bank deposits are insured up  to $100,000 by the FDIC. E*TRADE Bank and E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.  E*TRADE brokerage accounts are maintained by E*TRADE  Securities, Inc. Products offered by E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or  obligations of E*TRADE Bank, are subject to investment  risk, including possible loss of principal invested. ClearStation is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc.  E*TRADE is a registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities,  Inc. Member NASD/SIPC.  Copyright (c) 2000.  ClearStation , Inc. All rights reserved.

																	 Question?  Get it answered!   Comments? Talk to us!  Copyright  ? 1998-2000 ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademark  Notice  Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for Nasdaq, 20 minutes otherwise.  ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of E*TRADE Group, Inc.
[IMAGE]	  About Us     	I	 Help     	I	 Feedback     	I	 Member  Agreement     	I	 Privacy  Statement    	I	 Advertise     	I	 Jobs     	I	Join      	I	FAQ


498837 not apb

499013  should be 180.00

thanks


Hi Kathy,

I can't remember if you are in the loop on this one.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000 10:08
AM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 10/16/2000 09:48:01 AM
To: "Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)" <lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>,
"'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Revised letter of Sept 29

I believe that this is the most recent version.  Lee, check the dates to make
sure they are right.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 10:17 AM
To: Shoemaker, Kent
Subject: FW: Revised letter of Sept 29

Kent,

Please send Kay the Amendment #4 draft (shedule change for Units 19,20,23,24).
I think you had it last.  I can't seem to find it either.

Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 2:58 PM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
Cc: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com; kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com;
ben.f.jacoby@enron.com; chris.booth@enron.com; Kathleen.Clark@enron.com
Subject: Re: Revised letter of Sept 29

Lee,

Your changes to the letter look fine to me.

I'm attaching the latest version I have on change order #2.  Are we ready
to go with this one?

(See attached file: changeorder#2rev7.doc)

We would like to close out #3 and #4 soon.  I believe GE prepared #4.
Could you send me a copy of the latest draft of #4, as it was inadvertently
deleted from my computer. Meanwhile, I'll work to get you a draft of #3.

Thanks,

Kay

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 10/13/2000 08:03:49 AM

To:   kay.mann@enron.com
cc:   michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com,
      ben.f.jacoby@enron.com, chris.booth@enron.com

Subject:  Revised letter of Sept 29

 <<SSlttrsept29rev1.doc>>  <<SSlttrsept29rev2.doc>>

Kay,

Attached is a redline version of Sept 29 letter, and clean copy for
sign/send.  The change involves reference to the contract paragraphs that
deal with corrections, enabling Enron and GE to reach agreement on timing
of
performance of corrective work, if we both agreed to a schedule other than
prior to delivery to site.  We recognize that if any of this work has an
impact on your EPC contractor's site work schedule, there maybe other
consequences/remedies, as provided in the contract.

I'll sign and fax.  Hope you all have no objections.

Thanks,

Lee

(See attached file: SSlttrsept29rev1.doc)
(See attached file: SSlttrsept29rev2.doc)

 - Change Order #4.doc


All:

Here are the agreements that Enron had with PIRA.  Attached is a copy of the cost for the services.  Please review and let me know which subscriptions and how many you will be need. We will have one agreement that combines Houston, Calgary, and Portland.  If you have any data questions our PIRA sales contact is Jeff Steele at 212-686-6808.

Thanks,

Danielle
x37926

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Steele [mailto:jsteele@pira.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Marcinkowski, Danielle
Subject: PIRA and Enron

Danielle,

PIRA had two agreements in place with Enron.  The first was with Enron
Global Markets, which received the following PIRA Services:

- North American Natural Gas Retainer Service
- North American Electricity Retainer Service
- Global Oil Retainer Service
- European Natural Gas Retainer Service
- Emissions Market Intelligence Services (EMIS) - NOX /SO2/CO2 coverage
- Natural Gas Liquids (NGL) Forecast - covering U.S./Europe
- Daily Electricity Demand Forecast
- Western Canada Crude Price Forecast and PADD II Balances report

PIRA served the following four offices:

1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77251

121 SW Salmon Street
Portland, OR 97214

3500-400 3rd Ave SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 4H2
Canada

44 Grosvenor Place
London
United Kingdom

The Users at Enron Global Markets were divided up as follows:

100 Users - Oil, Natural Gas, and Electricity Retainers (Houston,
London, Calgary, Portland)
10 - European Natural Gas Service (London only)
10 - Natural Gas Liquids Market Forecast (Houston only)
10 - Emissions Market Intelligence Services (Houston only)
25 - Daily Electricity Demand Forecast (Houston and Portland only)
10 - W. Canadian Crude Price Forecast and PADD II Balances Report (London
and Houston only)

The second account we had with Enron was with Enron Energy Services.  Under
this contract, we provided the Oil, Natural Gas, and Electricity Retainer
Services to 10 Users located at

1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002-7361

I hope this helps.  Please contact me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Jeff Steele
Manager, Business Development
PIRA Energy Group
(212) 686-6808, ext. 331
jsteele@pira.com


Jeanie,

Here is my Resume........

Please, Please, Please hire me.......

Best Regards........

Jon


---------------------- Forwarded by Madhur Dayal/HOU/ECT on 07/21/2000 04:43
PM ---------------------------

"Lisa O'Connor" <lisa@imarkets.com> on 07/10/2000 12:58:25 PM
To: "Madhur Dayal" <madhur.dayal@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Our Documentation Contact

Dear Madhur,

I just want to forward to you the name and number of our documentation
contact.   Mike Minnich is our director of operations and he can be reached
at 415-369-5016.  He is handling all questions/negotiations on the user
agreements.   Please feel free to forward this on to your legal department.
Thanks again and please let me know if anyone else would be interested in
seeing the demo and I'll set them up with a username and password.

Regards,

Lisa O'Connor

Lisa Mears O'Connor, CFA
BuySide Direct LLC
a subsidiary of Intelligent Markets, Inc.
415-369-5020 Phone
415-369-5021 Fax


---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 08:45
AM ---------------------------

knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/06/2000 07:59:13 AM
To: " - *Kinney, Doug" <dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
*jcasas2@enron.com." <jcasas2@enron.com>
cc: " - *Stiles, Marianne" <mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Porter,
Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Perrone, Brian"
<bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Herzog, Hans"
<hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon, Charles"
<cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: DPL REVISED OFO

DPL has just revised its OFO for the following days:

Tuesday March 7th - previous OFO volume was 943 dth, please deliver 763 dth
instead.

Wednesday March 8th - previous OFO volume was 863 dth, please deliver 743 dth
instead.

Chris Germany will be advised of this change via a spreadsheet sent by Herndon
at 9 am est.


-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Covington
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 3:35 PM
To: David Heineke; Jim Wallis; Ricky Stewart
Subject: FW: Stalin quote

-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Wright [SMTP:julie@rpcga.com] <mailto:[SMTP:julie@rpcga.com]>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 3:30 PM
To: Jim Love; Patsy Henry; Candy Grant; Carol Covington; Faye Click
Subject: Stalin quote

 > "Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
 >  Those who count the votes decide everything."
 >
 >             -Josef Stalin
 >


Dear Mary,

 Thanks for the good note and congratulations to you as you take this
next step in your career.  It has, to be sure, been a pleasure working with
you.  I trust you will remember that the Council has an (800) number,
452-5161, if you need to be in touch with the great Northwest.  And if I
have questions about how they're doing things in other parts of the country,
I hope you won't mind fielding an inquiry to two?  Again, everything good in
the new position!

Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mary.Hain@enron.com [mailto:Mary.Hain@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 10:24 AM
To: David_Aamodt@pgn.com; dapnucc@teleport.com; dick@pnucc.org;
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com; Frank_Afranji@pgn.com; raa@vnf.com;
Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; ajaldrich@snopud.com; Jeff.Alexander@enron.com;
Al.Alexanderson@enron.com; Keonee.Almaida@enron.com;
hollis.alpert@ferc.fed.us; Brenda.Anderson@enron.com; angles@howry.com;
Alan.B.Aronowitz@enron.com; gdb@vnf.com; npbaker@bpa.gov; ellen@tca-us.com;
paulb@citizenspower.com; paulb@citizenspower.com; garybarbour@email.msn.com;
jbartus@cammckenna.com; glynda.becker@mail.house.gov;
Samuel.Behrends@enron.com; bbennett@bpa.gov; sberman@hewm.com;
ramsen.betfarhad@mail.house.gov; KBILAS@SKADDEN.COM; sbooye@Skadden.com;
raymond.r.boyce@state.or.us; tbradley@bracepatt.com;
scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com; sbrose@steptoe.com; sbuchheit@bracepatt.com;
alanb@wutc.wa.gov; Jim.Byrne@enron.com; vergil.cabasco@mail.house.gov;
johncameron@dwt.com; Doug.Carmichael@enron.com; Ed.Cassidy@enron.com;
ajchambe@llgm.com; Melissa.Chiechi@enron.com; elchristensen@snopud.com;
kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us; rcloward@avistacorp.com;
david_cohen@rniinc.com; Bill.Comish@enron.com; Victor.Contract@enron.com;
powerlac@aol.com; Frederick.Coolbroth@enron.com;
michaelcorrigan@bchydro.bc.ca; kcorum@nwppc.org; KCurry@bracepatt.com;
wcurry@enron.com; gdahlke@paine-hamblen.com; kadaly@mcimail.com;
mday@gmssr.com; dearing@chelanpud.org; tdeboer@paine-hamblen.com;
Tom_Delaney@enron.com; sdleonard@earthlink.net; dldorrell@stoel.com;
Mary.Doyle@enron.com; Jay.Dudley@enron.com; mce2280@idahopower.com;
michaelearly@earthlink.net; Katherine.Edwards@enron.com;
rle@givenspursley.com; imaxtrans@aol.com; Chris.Elliott@enron.com;
sandra.elliott@ferc.fed.us; kerwin@ect.enron.com; dezickson@mwe.com;
Jim.Fallon@enron.com; fallonr@howrey.com; Elias.Farrah@enron.com;
Michele_Farrell@pgn.com; dfaulk@puget.com; gfergus@brobeck.com;
Willard.Fields@enron.com; sfisher@avistaenergy.com; pfox@bracepatt.com;
Pat.Franklin@enron.com; John.Frazzell@enron.com; ericf@prestongates.com;
don.furman@pacificorp.com; segfurst@bpa.gov; Jackie.Gallagher@enron.com;
craiggannett@dwt.com; Alvaro.Garcia@enron.com; sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com;
wgibson@nwppc.org; ggilbert@ci.tacoma.wa.us; Pat.Gilman@enron.com;
Alex.Goldberg@enron.com; jlgreene@energyadvocates.com;
Chris_Groener@mail.house.gov; Mary.Groggin@enron.com;
Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com; Stephen.Hall@enron.com; steve.c.hall@enron.com;
Leo.Hamblin@enron.com; whannaford@NWPPC.org; jim.harding@ci.seattle.wa.us;
rhardy@hardyenergy.com; kharri@puget.com; Steve_Hawke@pgn.com;
dhawkins@caiso.com; marc.hellman@state.or.us; Scott.Helyer@enron.com;
mhenry@bracepatt.com; dwmp@teleport.com; rhornby@tca-us.com;
mhornst@aol.com; dhuard@jmbm.com; Marlene.Huntsinger@pgn.com;
cfi1@tca-us.com; Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; pljacklin@stoel.com;
montrey@aol.com; danj@cfmdc.com; kgjohnson@bpa.gov; ljohnson@pwrteam.com;
Karen.E.Jones@enron.com; mkanner@kannerandassoc.com; karid@perkinscoie.com;
pkaufma@ect.enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Devon Kehoe; James.Keller@enron.com; Joe.Kelliher@mail.house.gov;
kkennedy@bdbc.com; Rick.Kessler@enron.com; rdking@bpa.gov;
Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; rsk@schwabe.com;
gwilliams8@austin.rr.com; John.Klauberg@enron.com; Holli.Krebs@enron.com;
ekrogh@wiredweb.com; blafferty@avistacorp.com; wdlamb@bpa.gov;
John.Lamb@enron.com; Therese.Lamb@enron.com; srlarson@bpa.gov;
Cindy_Tatham@co.washington.or.us; zora.lazic@bchydro.com;
kaleathley@bpa.gov; pamela_lesh@pgn.com; Debi.LeVine@enron.com;
lcg@europa.com; doug.little@powerex.com; Robert.Loeffler@enron.com;
Chris.Long@enron.com; sjlong@bpa.gov; rlopezv@www.conet.com.mx;
david_lucio@iep.illinova.com; king.lum@bchydro.bc.ca;
kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com; Mark.Maehr@enron.com;
Randal.T.Maffett@enron.com; John.Malowney@enron.com; Sueyen.Mao@enron.com;
Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Lee.Martin@enron.com;
maurw@perkinscoie.com; Wayne.Mays@enron.com; Michael.McCall@enron.com;
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Travis.McCullough@enron.com;
Michael.McDonald@enron.com; brugen@erols.com; mckinley@wpuda.org;
mcm@vnf.com; mcnichol@wapa.com; shauna@pnucc.org;
Maureen.McVicker@enron.com; pmeringolo@brobeck.com; demetcalf@bpa.gov;
cemeyer@bpa.gov; jmilegich@sppc.com; fred_miller@pgn.com;
Jeffrey.Miller@enron.com; jerry.miller@pacificorp.com;
Laura.Miller@enron.com; scott.miller@ferc.fed.us; Bill.Miner@enron.com;
phil_moeller@gorton.senate.gov; pmohler@hewm.com; emoler@velaw.com;
nkmorgado@bpa.gov; Mike@tonkon.com; krmoxness@bpa.gov;
mmps@millcreeklaw.com; pmurphy@mbllp.com; terrym@millcreeklaw.com;
bmurtha@acy.sunint.com; Rich.Nassief@enron.com; tod@mgninc.com;
Douglas_Nichols@pgn.com; Patty.Nichols@enron.com; Christi.Nicolay@enron.com;
tmnoguchi@bpa.gov; darcy@tonkon.com; Sarah.Novasel@enron.com;
Sarah.Novosel@enron.com; Tom.O'Donnell@enron.com; PObenchain@idahopower.com;
Pegy.Olds@enron.com; Carol.Opatrny@enron.com; tpaine@avistacorp.com;
Dave.Parquet@enron.com; bpascoe@mtpower.com; afpaschke@bpa.gov;
ccperigo@bpa.gov; wlpernas@stoel.com; lpeters@pacifier.com; jill@pnucc.org;
Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com; npickover@bracepatt.com;
Phillip.Platter@enron.com; Alfred.Pollard@enron.com; Walt.Pollock@enron.com;
gporter@sppc.com; Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com; jquint@puget.com;
arlene.ragozin@ci.seattle.wa.us; maraschio@bpa.gov;
Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com; Scott.Rasmussen@enron.com; Bobby.Reeves@enron.com;
preiten@pngc.com; reyna2r@kochind.com; shellyr@pacifier.com;
Jeff.Richter@enron.com; raroach@bpa.gov; atrodrigues@bpa.gov;
rarogers@bpa.gov; peterroi@erols.com; Rothfelder@rlo-law.com;
Richard.Sanders@enron.com; jsaven@pacifier.com;
Michael.Schilmoeller@enron.com; jschlect@avistacorp.com;
Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com; Diana.Scholtes@enron.com;
Roger.Seifert@enron.com; Cara.Semperger@enron.com; asettanni@bracepatt.com;
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; vsharp@enron.com; msmith1@enron.com;
Joshua.Sheinkman@enron.com; jshurts@nwppc.org; Sid@enron.com;
msizer@ci.tacoma.wa.us; slavens.paula@deps.ppl.com; small@wrightlaw.com;
small@wrightlaw.com; douglas.smith@ferc.fed.us; Mike.Smith@enron.com;
Roger.Smith@enron.com; Larry.Soderquist@enron.com; Harvey.Spigal@enron.com;
mstauffer@mtpower.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
mestewardpsedc@worldnet.att.net; JKStier@BPA.gov;
rbstrong@paine-hamblen.com; DASwanstrom@Verner.com; Mike.Swerzbin@enron.com;
tabors@tca-us.com; Ron.Tapscott@enron.com; James.K.Tarpey@enron.com;
Jake.Thomas@enron.com; ryan_thomas@burns.senate.gov; jrt2058@idahopower.com;
maryann@pnucc.org; mtierney@sempra.com; robin_tompkins@pgn.com;
Ann.Tumlinson@enron.com; AW.Turner@enron.com; Sheila.Tweed@enron.com;
Lisa.Urick@enron.com; rvermeers@avistacorp.com; Frank.W.Vickers@enron.com;
John.Walley@enron.com; kristiwallis@sprintmail.com; walshl@howrey.com;
swalton@enron.com; Steve.Walton@enron.com; kaward@bpa.gov;
Kim.Ward@enron.com; Carol.Wardell@enron.com; dwatkiss@bracepatt.com;
sawatson@bpa.gov; judy.welch@NWPP.ORG; 211-6155@MCIMAIL.COM;
Kwenzel@zzz.com; cwestadt@sppc.com; Brian.Whalen@enron.com;
Bill.Williams@enron.com; klwmtp@worldnet.att.net; lyn_williams@pgn.com;
Greg.Wolfe@enron.com; Vickie.Wolk-Laniewski@enron.com; Ed.Wood@enron.com;
mwood@stoel.com; Steve.Wright@enron.com; Teresa.L.Wright@enron.com;
WSCC@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com; Christian.Yoder@enron.com;
Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Steve.Kean@enron.com; Travel.in.the.Park@enron.com;
D.Brett.Hunsucker@enron.com; Carla.Hoffman@enron.com;
Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com; Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Donna.Fulton@enron.com;
Roger.Fragua@enron.com; James.B.Fallon@enron.com;
Michael.Etringer@enron.com; Terry.W.Donovan@enron.com;
Stacy.Dickson@enron.com; Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com;
Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Sean.Crandall@enron.com;
Tom.Briggs@enron.com; t.briggs@enron.com; Stacey.Bolton@enron.com;
dbenevid@enron.com; dbenevid@enron.com; Tim.Belden@enron.com;
Robert.Badeer@enron.com; Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com; Alan.Comnes@enron.com;
Lysa.Akin@enron.com; Portland.West.Desk@enron.com; assad@elektro.com.br;
Alan.Comnes@enron.com; Alberto.Levy@enron.com; Aleck.Dadson@enron.com;
Allison.Navin@enron.com; Amy.Fabian@enron.com; Barbara.A.Hueter@enron.com;
Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com; Bill.Moore@enron.com;
cristinah@elektro.com.br; Carlos.Gustavo.Azevedo@enron.com;
Carmen.Perez@enron.com; Carolyn.Cooney@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com;
Chauncey.Hood@enron.com; Chris.Long@enron.com; Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com;
Cynthia.Sandherr@enron.com; Damon.Harvey@enron.com; Dan.Staines@enron.com;
Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com; Dave.Mangskau@enron.com;
Donald.Lassere@enron.com; Donna.Fulton@enron.com; Eidy.Catala@enron.com;
Elizabeth.Linnell@enron.com; Frank.Rishe@enron.com;
Geriann.Warner@enron.com; Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com; Gisele.S.Braz@enron.com;
Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com; Guillermo.Canovas@enron.com;
Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; Howard.Fromer@enron.com;
James.D.Steffes@enron.com; Janine.Migden@enron.com;
Javier.Pantoja@enron.com; Jean.R.Dressler@enron.com; Jean.Ryall@enron.com;
Jeff.Brown@enron.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Joao.Paixao@enron.com; Joe.Allen@enron.com; Joe.Connor@enron.com;
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Joe.Hillings@enron.com; Jose.Bestard@enron.com;
Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; Kathleen.Sullivan@enron.com; Kerry.Stroup@enron.com;
Kikumi.Kishigami@enron.com; Kirsten.Bellas@enron.com;
Lara.Leibman@enron.com; Laurie.Knight@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com;
Linda.J.Noske@enron.com; Linda.Robertson@enron.com; Lindsay.Meade@enron.com;
Lisa.Yoho@enron.com; Lora.Sullivan@enron.com; Luiz.Maurer@enron.com;
Lysa.Akin@enron.com; Marchris.Robinson@enron.com; Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com;
Marcie.Milner@enron.com; Mary.Hain@enron.com; Maureen.McVicker@enron.com;
Melinda.Pharms@enron.com; Michelle.Belzak@enron.com;
Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com; Nancy.Hetrick@enron.com;
Patrick.Keene@enron.com; Ray.Alvarez@enron.com;
Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com; Ricardo.Charvel@enron.com;
Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com;
Robert.Frank@enron.com; Robert.Hemstock@enron.com;
Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com; Robin.Kittel@enron.com;
Ron.McNamara@enron.com; rboston@enron.com; Rubena.Buerger@enron.com;
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com; Scott.Bolton@enron.com;
Sergio.Assad@enron.com; Stella.Chan@enron.com; Stephen.D.Burns@enron.com;
Steve.Montovano@enron.com; Steve.Walton@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com;
Sue.Nord@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Susan.M.Landwehr@enron.com;
Terri.Miller@enron.com; Thane.Twiggs@enron.com; Tom.Briggs@enron.com;
Tom.Chapman@enron.com; Tom.Delaney@enron.com; Tom.Hoatson@enron.com;
Tracy.Cooper@enron.com; Valeria.Lima@enron.com; Vinio.Floris@enron.com;
Xi.Xi@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
Robert.Frank@enron.com; Lara.Leibman@enron.com; Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com;
Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com;
Aleck.Dadson@enron.com; Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com;
Howard.Fromer@enron.com; Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; rboston@enron.com;
Janine.Migden@enron.com; Christie.Patrick@enron.com; Jane.Wilson@enron.com;
Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com; kmagruder@newpower.com; scovino@newpower.com;
Rebecca.Carter@enron.com; Shelley.Corman@enron.com; Janet.Butler@enron.com;
Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com; Brad.Richter@enron.com; Greg.Piper@enron.com;
Kevin.McGowan@enron.com; Kim.Ward@enron.com; Leslie.Reeves@enron.com
Subject: I'm Leaving Enron

I am going to be the Senior Regulatory Counsel at ISO New England starting
on April 9, 2001.   My last day in the Portland area will be March 31,
2001.  I enjoyed working with you and wish you the best of everything.  My
new address will be:

Mary Hain
Senior Regulatory Counsel
ISO New England Inc.
One Sullivan Road
Holyoke, MA  01040-2841
(413) 535-4000
mhain@ISO-NE.com


Candy,

Attached for your review and further handling are the revised draft Timber
Management & Sales Agreements with your recent revisions incorporated into
the documents.  If I can be of further assistance please let me know.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 01:51 PM -----

	Eric Gillaspie
	08/15/2000 04:37 PM

		 To: Candace L Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Lofton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Timber Management and Sale Agreements

Per Gerald Nemec's request, I have attached the revised Timber Management
Agreement and the associated Timber Sales Agreement for your review and
comment.

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Ed is drafting the letter and coordinating with Michelle.

Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Furrow, Dale
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Herod, Brenda F.; Steffes, James D.; Maynard, Michelle; Hughes, Evan; Cross, Edith; Aucoin, Berney C.
Subject:	PECO physical customers, Rejection and DeDASR

To confirm earlier conversations and associated action items with respect to PECO Physical Customers (listed below on spreadsheet):

(1)	W/ Brenda: Rejection lists for PJM currently include Cheltenham (Simon) and Lehigh Valley Dairies (Suiza).  These will be pulled from the PJM list.  Suiza is already accounted for on the GNO reject list, Simon is currently not on the reject list (status is pending).
(2)	Jim Steffes: On point for letter to PECO to indicate that we would not object to placing these 15 sites on bundled POLR service.
(3)	Michelle: Has confirmed that DeDASR action for contracts not on reject list (Simon and Macerich) will not affect rights under contract (this would merely represent exercise of EES supply option).
(4)	Next Step: Evan-since all of the contracts here are either on reject list, or are associated with Simon/Macerich (which will not be affected by D-DASR action) we need to initiate DeDASR activities for all 15 sites immediately after our motion to reject the first batch of contracts is filed.

Thanks,
Dale

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 Berney & Dale,

The attached spreadsheet indicates the fifteen (15) accounts in the PJM Control Area that EESI currently delivers physical power to.  The fifteen (15) accounts are all behind PECO Energy Company.  Most of the contracts were "commodity only" deals that have expired, with the exception of American College which expires 01/31/2002.

The other accounts are behind bundled outsource deals (i) Simon Properties (Cheltenham Shopping & SDG Macerich Properties) and (ii) Suiza Foods (Lehigh Valley Dairies) and (iii) Prudential Insurance Companies.

Let me know if I can be of further assistance.

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herod, Brenda F.
Sent:	Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:28 PM
To:	Breese, Mark; Cross, Edith; Furrow, Dale; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Maynard, Michelle; Sharp, Vicki
Cc:	Darmitzel, Paul; Dietrich, Janet; Apollo, Beth; O'Neil, Murray P.; McMichael Jr., Ed; Black, Don; Herndon, Rogers; Smith, Mike D.
Subject:	REJECTION MOTION UPDATE

Update:

1.  GAS - All sales customers have been reviewed, and we believe the list is ready to go, pending a final review by Janet and Don.  All has been transmitted (copy attached) to Marshall Turner.  We are still lacking any SUPPLY contracts that need to be rejected, but should have it in the morning.

2.  POWER -  All sales customers except for 6 have been identified.  We have transmitted (copy attached) all information with the exception of these 6 to Marshall Turner.  We work tomorrow on resolving the 6, and will provide the data to Marshall at that time.  Of course, these schedules are subject to a final review by Janet and Rogers.

3.  NON-STANDARD DEALS - I do not have an update from last night, and per Marshall Turner, he has not received any additional schedules from Michelle since yesterday (Mondy, 12/17).  What is the status of this filing?

As a reminder, I need the current support from each group for the analysis and reason for rejection.  As we agreed in the meeting this morning, Janet has asked that I be on point for gathering and retaining this.  Please forward me your matrices that suppor this rejection filing.

Janet:  As Outlook was down most of today, I don't think anyone was able to get you the Power matrix.  I do not have the most current one, but I have attached the one as of last Friday to provide you the format.

Per discussion with Marshall this evening, the motion is being reviewed internally at Weil, Gotshal, and he will keep us posted tomorrow on filing status.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Brenda
x35778

 << File: PowerRejection_ComEd_121801.xls >>  << File: PowerRejection_PJM_121801.xls >>  << File: Gas Customer Rejection List 12-18-01.xls >>  << File: Termination Matrix.xls >>


??????? ??????? The Teke house will be partying this Saturday for Civil War.?
Stop by if you have tickets to the game or want to watch the game with the
guys who do not have tickets.? The game starts at 12:30 P.M.?

??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Tyson


I have reviewed the memo distributed in yesterday's staff meeting and offer
the following changes in red:

Brenda Herod serves as Business Controller for ENA's assets business, working
with the Gas Assets group and the Texas trading desk.  Her responsibilities
include global contracts and facilities, risk management, confirmations, gas
scheduling, volume management, settlements and regulatory compliance for
Houston Pipeline, LRC and Enron Midstream Services.

Thanks.


FYI.  I'm editing now and have several proposed edits.  Should be to you
within 20 minutes.


Please note the following organizational changes in Enron Corp and Enron
North America.

Wanda Curry is joining the corporate accounting team working with Rick Causey
on special projects including certain retail and broadband accounting
initiatives.  We thank Wanda for her significant contributions to ENA in both
the planning and reporting function, as well as transaction support
activities.  She played a key role in making 1999 a successful year at ENA.

Wes Colwell will join ENA to lead both the planning and reporting and the
transaction support accounting functions.  Wes joined Enron in 1999 and made
key contributions setting up a company-wide accounting transaction support
team which assists each of Enron,s business units on critical issues and
deals.

Rodney Faldyn rejoins Enron from Azurix to continue to build the corporate
accounting transaction support team.  Rodney will continue the effort to grow
this team and take on the management of key accounting matters that impact
Enron.

These changes will be effective immediately with a transition period during
March.  Please join us in congratulating Wanda, Wes and Rodney on their new
roles.


Louise, please let me know if we corrected the ESA/Mexico slide as you would like to see it.


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

Are you looking to invest in, attract investors for, provide services to or
understand the business and technology dynamics of the hottest companies
emerging in the energy sector?   Attend the Energy Venture Fair, June 25 &
26, 2001, in Boston, MA and hear CEOs from 75 hot energy companies present
their business plans.  Complete event description available at
www.energyventurefair.com or call Nannette Mooney at (818) 888-4445, ext. 11.

Miss last week? Catch up on the latest deregulation, competition and
restructuring developments in the energy industry with SCIENTECH's
IssuesWatch

CORRECTION to 5/25/01 IssueAlert: The U.S. Senate has been evenly divided
between Democrats and Republicans since the November 2000 elections, not  for
seven years as was incorrectly stated in the column. We apologize for  any
misunderstanding that this error might have caused.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
May 29, 2001

EDF Pursues Italy's Montedison;
Lack of Reciprocity Still a Factor

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]Power giant Electricit,de France (EDF) has sent shock waves through
Italian financial markets and government ministries by attempting to raise
its stake in electric firm Montedison to 20 percent from about 6 percent.
However, Romano Prodi, the European Union commissioner for competition, is
considering an intervention in the battle between EDF, the French electricity
monopoly, and the Italian government. The latter has passed an ad hoc law
restricting EDF to 2 percent of the voting rights for Montedison, the Italian
electricity supplier spun off by Enel.

Analysis: Once again, the issue of reciprocity has taken center stage in the
European power market, with EDF playing the staring role. For the last year
or so, as the European Union (EU) has enacted electric competition across the
Continent, France's EDF has taken advantage of competitive opportunities in
other European countries while resisting any penetration of its own market by
foreign suppliers. Although EDF has a presence in the United Kingdom through
its ownership of London Electricity, the French power firm has wanted for
some time to increase its position in Spain and Italy. However, the
neighboring governments continue to fight any expansion by EDF until France
reciprocates and allows further liberalization of its own market.

As I have mentioned before in this column, France has been criticized by
other European nations for delaying energy liberalization in its own country.
As a result, EDF (which controls approximately 90 percent of the French
electric industry) may not be allowed to make additional acquisitions abroad
until it further opens its own market to competition. To date, France has
only opened its power and gas markets by the minimum amount imposed by the
EU, and EDF has played a large role in this resistance. While other European
countries such as Germany have opened 100 percent of their markets to
competition, France has opted for a phased-in approach, opening a third each
of its power and gas markets by February 2003 and August 2008, respectively.
Thus, although other companies such as Spain's Endesa have attempted to push
through barriers to obtain entry into France, it is questionable when true
competition will emerge in the country.

Nevertheless, EDF has now set its sights on Italy through an expansion of its
holdings in Montedison, one of Italy's main electricity companies. Reports
are mixed about how much EDF currently owns of Montedison. EDF recently said
that its stake increased from 3.971 percent to 5.971 percent. However, other
reports have indicated that EDF already controls about 20 percent of the
capital assets of Montedison. Both increases in Montedison were made
recently, which EDF was forced to confirm to the Italian stock market
regulatory Consob. EDF has claimed that its holdings in Montedison were made
strictly as a minority financial holding to diversify the company's financial
assets across Europe. However, at the same time, EDF has also indicated that
any increase it makes in its holdings on Montedison would be for trading
purposes. In other words, EDF wants to control the generating assets of
Montedison for resale across Europe's wholesale market. Further, with a
20-percent stake, EDF would become Montedison's largest shareholder and a
major presence in Italy's power market even as France remains mostly closed.

EDF's argument that it has secured a stake in Montedison solely for financial
diversification purposes is not flying with the European Union or the Italian
government. The consensus across the Continent is that EDF is making a
strategic increase of its electric holdings and plans to make as many
additional acquisitions as will be allowed by EU regulators. In fact, EDF has
admitted that its strategy is to "make 50 percent of its turnover from
activities abroad by the end of 2005, compared with 25 percent currently."
Consequently, it is clear that the French power firm is looking beyond its
home country for expansion opportunities, and these opportunities typically
have been in distribution and generation assets. Moving forward, the company
has expressed an interest in expanding its trading operation

For instance, last month I discussed a report that EDF is preparing a bid for
the regional U.K. electricity company Seeboard, which is owned by American
Electric Power (NYSE: AEP). Serving about two million connected customers in
England, Seeboard owns, operates and maintains an electricity network of over
45,000 km (28,000 miles) of overhead lines and underground cables. An
acquisition of Seeboard would factor into EDF's overall expansion efforts in
Europe and be a nice complement to London Electricity, one of 12 regional
electricity companies in England and Wales, which EDF bought from Entergy in
1998. In addition, EDF has also made acquisitions in Sweden (Graninge) and
Germany (EnBW) and reportedly is Poland's largest electricity distributor.
These acquisitions were made by EDF International, which is wholly owned by
the French government, and thus subject to EU oversight. Perhaps due to EDF's
size and presence in Europe, these previous acquisitions were allowed without
a great deal of EU intervention. However, now that other countries have
voiced criticism of EDF and put pressure on the EU to intercede, it is
unlikely that further acquisitions will proceed without intense scrutiny.

As noted, trading appears to be the next wave of EDF's expansion efforts.
Toward this end, EDF partnered with Louis Dreyfus in 1999 to create an energy
trading company called EDF Trading. The various companies that EDF has
invested in across Europe support the company's efforts to both learn about
new competitive techniques and financially benefit when competition opens
fully across the Continent.

For its part, the Italian government has responded that it will block any
increase of EDF's ownership of Montedison, based primarily on the argument
that EDF is not offering the same opportunity for expansion in France.
Specifically, Italy is working on a decree that would freeze the voting
rights attached to the shares that EDF holds in Montedison. Further outlining
its position, the Italian government has said that Italy must protect the
imminent privatization of the power stations in the country that will soon be
sold by Enel, one of the country's main power firms. As Montedison will be
one of the main contenders of the assets owned by Enel, the Italian
government wants to block EDF from increasing its share in the company and
thus having access to additional power assets in Italy. For instance, Enel is
planning to sell Elettrogen, a generation company that produces about 15
percent of the production capacity in Italy. If EDF were to increase its
stake in Montedison before or after Montedison makes a play for Elettrogen,
then EDF, as a foreign entity, would gain a lock over the Italian power
supply market.

Italy's anti-EDF law is an interesting development, but it does not mark the
first such legislation that has been initiated across the Continent. Spain
also has created a similar law that is specifically targeted against EDF with
regard to the French company's pursuit of Hidrocantabrico, Spain's fourth
largest supplier. However, despite the efforts by Spain and Italy to restrict
any expansion of EDF, the laws, although they are already in place, may
ultimately be deemed anti-competitive and a breach of the Treaty of Rome,
which calls for unlimited freedom on the movement of capital within the EU.
Similar to how the Federal Trade Commission investigates anti-trust
allegations in the United States, any attempt to overturn the laws in Spain
and Italy would result in lengthy legal battles.

EDF also remains interested in the Spanish's largest power utility Endesa,
which is about the only foreign company that has been able to penetrate the
French electricity market (through a 30-percent acquisition of French
electricity generator Soci&eacutet,Nationale d&#39Electricit,et de
Thermique). Endesa, which recently terminated an attempted merger with
Iberdrola, Spain's second largest power firm, has been viewed as a takeover
target for larger companies such as EDF.

At last report, the EU Commission said that it would base any decision to
intervene in the battle between EDF and the Italian government on "how far
control was being exercised." In other words, EU intervention will be based
on how much foreign control EDF might wield in the Italian market with an
increased stake in Montedison. The fact that France remains resistant to
electric competition in its own country remains a key factor in this debate,
and it certainly adds heat to the criticisms leveled against EDF by the
governments of Italy and Spain.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Goodpasture & Larson


When the Commission granted Texas Eastern authority to hold capacity on
another pipeline in Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, 74 FERC P 61,074
(1996), it stated that when a pipeline holds capacity on an upstream
pipeline, the downstream pipeline's customers may hold title to the gas
transported on the upstream pipeline.  The Commission recognized this as one
of the limited exceptions to the shipper must have title rule.  Specifically,
the Commission stated:

The downstream pipeline will not hold title to gas shipped on capacity it has
acquired on an upstream
pipeline. Rather, shippers on the downstream pipeline will hold title to the
gas on the upstream
pipeline. We will allow a pipeline to hold the upstream capacity; we will
not, however, allow the pipeline
to hold title to the gas being shipped.  Thus, the downstream pipeline will
be the shipper on the upstream
pipeline, but will not hold title when the gas is being shipped. This results
in a limited exception to the rule
that a shipper must hold title to gas being shipped.

I believe that if we can address the Commission's other concerns about this
filing, they will grant a similar waiver for this transaction.  You can feel
free to pass this along to your contact at PNM.


The Wauna and Halsey PPA's with Ft. James have been cancelled. Sorry for the
delay.


This is what received from Northern Border for their direct IT projects.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:30 PM
To:	Barnes, Caroline; Concklin, Elaine; Keiser, John; Gilbert, Steve; Goradia, Pallavi; Moore, Jan; Brassfield, Morris
Subject:	2002 Capital Plan
Importance:	High

Please return your capital plans asap, no later than Thursday, Sept. 13.  I need by month and in-service dates so we can calculate DD & A and AFUDC.

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Fischer/HOU/EES on 08/09/2001 02:54 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services  From:  Mary Fischer                           07/31/2001 11:02 AM

To:	Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Angie Ramirez/HOU/EES@EES, Melanie Gaar/HOU/EES@EES, Dara M Flinn/HOU/EES@EES, Chad Gardner/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Myers/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Sally Seelig/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Laird/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Add'l 2Q E-schedules

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Fischer/HOU/EES on 07/31/2001 11:01 AM ---------------------------

Sonya City
07/30/2001 05:17 PM
To:	Mary Fischer/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Felecia Fitzgerald/EFS/EES@EES
Subject:	Add'l 2Q E-schedules


This is to inform you that we are rolling out changes to the Gas Daily option
pricing model.  Currently the system is not properly pricing index puts and
calls at locations with gas daily index premiums or discounts (puts and calls
are priced at the same level no matter what the index).  The change will
result in raising call values/lowering put values at locations with index
premiums and the opposite at locations with index discounts.

In addition, index plus/minus option deals (for example index -1.00 puts) -
which are currently incorrectly priced flat to the index option (the index
-1.00 put is priced flat to the index put)- will be accurately priced to
reflect the difference in strikes.

If  anyone has any questions please call me at  3-6731.

Thank You,

Larry May


I like this conceptually as an approach to manage costs but see the potential
problems with Shell if EECC is paid on time.  I think it may also be
extremely difficult to rework the LD's because the EECC wrap does not match
up with the subs very well (in some cases EECC's protection exceeds the subs
and in other is less).  I also wonder who is the credit for contractor
obligations in this scenario for the lenders?

Peter E Weidler
01/20/2001 09:31 AM
To: Cuiaba Core team, John Guidry/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Cuiaba EPC/Changeorders - please respond

I would like you all to consider the following concept and send back
feedback.  Especially John Novak or Eddy - on whether or not we have
significant exposure with Shell by using this approach.

If EECC is not neccessarily in the "for profit" business and Enron's goal is
to conclude the construction with as least cost as possible.  We need to
eliminate the negotiations between EECC and the project.  Right now - we get
change orders from EECC which include a markup of 10 %, and are "fluffed up"
because they know the project is going to object and negotiate and Shell is
not going to be happy until we reduce the cost of the proposed change orders
- this is a waste of time but has become part of the continuous
contractor/prjoect dance.   EECC also has some profit within the turnkey
portion of the job (pipelines and powerplant)  and is also asking for early
completion bonus on some things.  My concept is for Cuiaba team and EECC to
go complete open book.  Let us analyze and categorize all of EECC's actual
costs so we understand where we stand currently with respect to work
performed under the turnkey and outside of turnkey - and then we go straight
to final negotiations with Conduto and Bolinter.  EECC and us will both
jointly negotiate best deal possible, using our combined knowledge.   Get the
debate on EECC profit and whether or not it was appropriate to commission
certain work, or whether or not it was their fault or our fault, out of the
picture so everyone can focus on minimizing the total cost of this project -
from Enron's perspective.

We we conclude the process = the project gets charged all direct costs and
third party costs.  For those items which is clearly not the responsibility
fo the project - we offset those against profit and present the results to
Shell. We go to Shell and say here it is - please audit and either approve or
object.   Whatever the dispute - we will negotiate and as a result $10mm
profit may get decreased.

The advantage of this route is - we work together to minimize overall cost of
project, we eliminate an intercompany debate which will cost time and money
and Enron can undertand what the cost of this thing really is.  Right now I
do not actually know how much of the capex is profit and could and should be
deducted from our capex budget number as it relates to Enron's position in
the project.

Downside is - Shell may consider that Project management has violated its
fudiciary responsibility to the project  Although I think this can be
mitigated by audit and prior explanation of what we are doing to Shell.  I do
not really want Shell directly involved until we are done - because I do not
know what we will find or conclude.  Need help on fine tuning this part of
the strategy.

Let me know if I have rocks in my head.  If this is a good idea - I would
like to run it to ground this week with EECC.

Pete


I just wanted to pass you a note on these guys, since we had you call Bob Nardelli a couple of months ago to see what we could get going. Home Depot issued and RFQ and we responded with a non-conforming bid. We have, however, been chosen to exclusively negotiate with them (beat out Reliant and TXU) for their energy spend west of the Mississippi. We are focusing on a spend of about $50mm a year. We are also looking to help them with some of their problems in California, They entered into a number of 1-2 year deals with third party providers that were brokered for them by SRI and as they expire, they don't want to go back to the utilities.

Just wanted to let you know that we are making progress, and at the right time I may ask you to make another call to Nardelli.

New Subjects;

- I also have hooked up with Liz Flynn at Chase. She is an executive vice president and reports directly to Shapiro. She will look to me as the senior Enron contact for our deal and is aware and supportive of the corrective actions we are taking as well as the need for some restructuring.

- As you know, we have recently closed 3 deals with Sam Zell's Equity Office Properties. We did 5 year deals for their Chicago, NY and Boston based properties. We are in the midst of looking at other regions as well as negotiating a term sheet for an off-balance sheet partnership that would perform DSM and look at Distributed Generation opportunities at their properties. I think it would be great to have you call Sam and say how great it is that we were able to begin doing business together. I will send sheri a note with his number and some deal details if that is acceptible to you.

Thanks,
Jeremy


For clarification, the BOM Dec Sales to any of the three IOU's should be done
through the BILATERAL market between EPMI and the Counterparty directly.

Any forward transactions beyond December must be approved by Credit on a
deal-by-deal basis.

Please direct any questions to me 503-464-8755 (or cell 503-807-5633) or Bill
Bradford in Houston (713-853-3831).

---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT on 12/15/2000 09:11 AM
---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/14/2000 02:43 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Matt
Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean
Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli
Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wendy
Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C
Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Balance of the Month DEC Sales to the 3 California IOU's

Effective today, Credit has approved selling Balance of the Month (BOM) for
Dec 2000 to any of the three IOU's:  Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southern
California Edison Company, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company.

Please keep Credit informed of ALL balance of the month transactions with any
of these counterparties.

Regards,
Tracy


Hello Everyone,
Attached is a list of the group lists I have received from you. Please
check, and if there is a change, please let me know.  Also some of them
might have vacancies.

Also, your midterms are in the Evening MBA office. You can collect them
from there. Pf. Berk has asked me to let you to know that his policy is to
regrade your entire exam should you request the regrade of any particular
question.

Madhur

 - Group Lists.doc


FYI, one of my guys got a call from one of your band of merry men concerning
selling the 7EAs.
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 03:35
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           03/13/2001 03:23 PM

To: Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Letter Agreement for Purchase of 7EAs

Jim,

Please find attached the form of letter agreement that we have been using in
discussions for sale of the 7EAs.

Chris


Nancy,

The new attributes you have assigned to the IM-EMWNSS2-PHY  book are
duplicating the attributes of the INTRA-EMWNSS1-PHY book.  Per my original
request please change the region code for IM-EMWNSS2-PHY to Midwest_Old,
since it is my understanding from Burton that this book should no longer be
used.

If you have any more questions, give me a call.
Robin

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Nancy Hernandez @ ENRON                           02/12/2001 04:33 PM

To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Burton McIntyre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan D
Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FT-IM-ENOV-PHY

Robin:

Per your request, the attributes on FT-IM-ENOV-PHY have been changed as
follows

	Portfolio Code	Book Code	Book Type	Book Flag	Commodity	Region Code
OLD ATTRIBUTES	1	E	M	P	NG	MIDWEST
NEW ATTRIBUTES	P	A	M	P	NG	MIDWEST

In order to prevent duplicate book attributes,  IM-EMWNSS2-PHY attributes
were also changed as follows:

	Portfolio Code	Book Code	Book Type	Book Flag	Commodity	Region Code
OLD ATTRIBUTES	P	A	M	P	NG	MIDWEST
NEW ATTRIBUTES	P	A	M	P	NG	MIDWEST1

These changes will properly report the ERMS positions in the FT-IM-ENOV-PHY
book as apposed to IM-EMWNSS2-PHY, which should have no positions.

If you have any questions, please call me at ext 54751

Nancy


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000
01:12 PM ---------------------------

"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com> on 09/27/2000 11:49:02 AM
To: "Oncale Z (Zach)" <ZONCALE@equiva.com>, "'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'"
<Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>, "Sutton EE (Ed)" <EESutton@equilon.com>,
"Olmscheid JF (Joe)" <JFOLMSCHEID@Equilon.com>
cc:

Subject: DUMP AT WORK

> >> We've all been there but don't like to admit it.  We've all kicked
> >> back in
> >> our cubicles and suddenly felt something a brew down below.  As much
> >> as we
> >> try to convince ourselves, the WORK POOP is inevitable.  For those of
> >> you
> >> who hate pooping at work as much as I do, I give you the...........
> >>
> >> 1999 SURVIVAL GUIDE FOR TAKING A DUMP AT WORK.
> >> Memorize these definitions and pooping at work will become a pure
> >> pleasure.
> >>
> >> ESCAPEE
> >> Definition: A fart that slips out while taking a leak at the urinal or
> >> forcing poop in a stall. This is usually accompanied by a sudden wave
> >> of
> >> panic/embarrassment. This is similar to the hot flash you receive when
> >> passing an unseen police car and speeding.  If you release an escapee,
> >> do
> >> not acknowledge it. Pretend it did not happen.  If you are standing
> >> next to
> >> the farter at the urinal, pretend that you did not hear it.  No one
> >> likes an
> >> escapee, it is uncomfortable for all involved.  Making a joke or
> >> laughing
> >> makes both parties feel uneasy.
> >>
> >> JAILBREAK (Used in conjunction with escapee) Definition: When forcing
> >> poop,
> >> several farts slip out at a machine guns pace. This is usually a side
> >> effect
> >> of diarrhea or a hangover. If this should happen do not panic, remain
> >> in the
> >> stall until everyone has left the bathroom so to spare everyone the
> >> awkwardness of what just occurred.
> >>
> >> COURTESY FLUSH
> >> Definition: The act of flushing the toilet the instant the nose cone
> >> of the
> >> poop log hits the water and the poop is whisked away to an undisclosed
> >> location.  This reduces the amount of air time the poop has to stink
> >> up the
> >> bathroom.  This can help you avoid being caught doing the WALK OF
> >> SHAME.
> >>
> >> WALK OF SHAME
> >> Definition: Walking from the stall, to the sink, to the door after you
> >> have
> >> just stunk-up the bathroom.  This can be a very uncomfortable moment
> >> if
> >> someone walks in.  As with all farts, it is best to pretend that the
> >> smell
> >> does not exist.
> >>
> >> OUT OF THE CLOSET POOPER
> >> Definition: A colleague who poops at work and is damn proud of it.
> >> You will
> >> often see an Out of the Closet Pooper enter the bathroom with a
> >> newspaper or
> >> magazine under their arm.  Always look around the office for the Out
> >> of the
> >> Closet pooper before entering the bathroom.
> >>
> >> THE POOPING FRIENDS NETWORK (PFN)
> >> Definition:  A group of coworkers who band together to ensure
> >> "emergency
> >> pooping" goes off without incident.  This group can help you to
> >> monitor the
> >> whereabouts of OUT OF THE CLOSET POOPERS and identify SAFE HAVENS.
> >>
> >> SAFE HAVEN
> >> Definition:  A seldom used bathroom somewhere in the building where
> >> you can
> >> least expect visitors.  Try floors that are predominantly of the
> >> opposite
> >> sex.  This will reduce the odds of a pooper of your sex entering the
> >> bathroom.
> >>
> >> TURD BURGLAR
> >> Definition: A pooper who does not realize that you are in the stall
> >> and
> >> tries to force the door open.  This is one of the most shocking and
> >> vulnerable moments that occur when work taking a dump at work.  If
> >> this
> >> occurs, remain in the stall until the TURD BURG leaves. This way you
> >> will
> >> avoid all uncomfortable eye contact.
> >>
> >> CAMO-COUGH
> >> Definition: A phony cough which alerts all new entrants into the
> >> bathroom
> >> that you are in a stall.  This can be used to cover-up a WATERMELON or
> >> to
> >> alert potential TURD BURGLARS.  Very effective when used in
> >> conjunction with
> >> an ASTAIRE.
> >>
> >> ASTAIRE
> >> Definition:  A subtle toe-tap that is used to alert potential TURD
> >> BURGLARS
> >> that you are occupying a stall.  This will remove all doubt that the
> >> stall
> >> is occupied.  If you hear an ASTAIRE, leave the bathroom immediately
> >> so the
> >> pooper can poop in peace.
> >>
> >> WATERMELON
> >> Definition: A turd that creates a loud splash when hitting the toilet
> >> water.
> >> This is also an embarrassing incident.  If you feel a WATERMELON
> >> coming on,
> >> create a diversion.  See CAMO-COUGH.
> >>
> >> HAVANA OMELET
> >> Definition:  A load of diarrhea that creates a series of loud splashes
> >> in
> >> the toilet water. Often accompanied by an escapee.  Try using a
> >> CAMO-COUGH
> >> with an ASTAIRE.
> >>
> >> UNCLE TED
> >> Definition:  A bathroom user who seems to linger around forever.
> >> Could
> >> spend extended lengths of time in front of the mirror or sitting on
> >> the pot.
> >> An UNCLE TED makes it difficult to relax while on the crapper, as you
> >> should
> >> always wait to drop your load when the bathroom is empty. This
> >> benefits you
> >> as well as the other bathroom attendees.
> >>
> >> FLY BY
> >> Definition: The act of scouting out a bathroom before pooping.  Walk
> >> in,
> >> check for other poopers.  If there are others in the bathroom, leave
> >> and
> >> come back again.  Be careful not to become a FREQUENT FLYER.  People
> >> may
> >> become suspicious if they catch you constantly going into the
> >> bathroom.
> >>
> >> CRACK WHORE
> >> Definition: A crapper that has seen more behinds than a Greyhound Bus.
> >> Tell
> >> tale signs of a CRACK WHORE include pee stains and crap streaks.
> >> Avoid CRACK WHORES at all cost.  Try finding out when the janitor
> >> cleans
> >> each particular bathroom.  Don't forget, a CRACK WHORE can become a
> >> SAFE
> >> HAVEN.
> >>
>
>


12,000 free photos and high quality graphics!
Click Here: http://www.passionup.com/free.htm?lk=ob7

Free Quicken Deluxe bookeeping system!
Click Here: http://www.passionup.com/free.htm?lk=ob8

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
Please allow at least 48 hours for your unsubscribe requests to be processed.

* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?HotDeals:*
* Enter your email address (plucci@ect.enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "HotDeals:*".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address plucci@ect.enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: plucci@ect.enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:ud.xha.ek6nt


First,  Scott is having a wine tasting (Australian) this Wednesday at
Galleria Ruggles.  I don't yet know the cost, but thought one or both of you
might be interested in coming.  I am going this time, and I think Hollis is
too.  Might be fun.  It is not a full dinner, just wines and appetizer type
stuff.

Second;  Mark

Most Fridays I will need to pick up William from after care at school,
requiring about a 5:30 departure for me.  Scott plans to oridnarily pick up
every other day of the week.  If I have a big project etc. I will come back
in with William.  However, I realize you generally want people available
until 6 each day.  Hopefully, this will not cause too much trouble.  Mary