Terry, etal -

In response to Terry's comments, I have prepared an outline of what I think
the Regulatory Risk Managment & Assessment Working Group will do.

Key tasks:

1. assist with the completion of the Regulatory Risk Management Process
 - do we have the right information
 - is the process leading to the right conclusions
 - etc.
2. act as chief liason for my group in Houston with the people in Government
Affairs throughout the world
 - explain the process
 - explain the purpose
 -  help with questions from Government Affairs people thoroughout the world
3. act as Audit "device" for Mitigation plans
 - make sure that the Mitigation plans are followed through on by responsible
party
4. provide oversight for "risk" assumptions
 - act somewhat as a neutral third-party for reasonableness of basic
assumptions
 - ensure that the broader political context is captured in the modeling
5. other
 - ???

In terms of work load, I would hope that once the process is up and running,
the work load will be minimal.  Clearly I would like the Working Group to
stay informed of Enron's current Regulatory Risk position, but I don't think
that this will be more than some overviews and responses to questions from my
direct team.

Given this structure, I would hope that people with political knowledge and
regulatory expertise are included.  For this effort, I need a team of people
who understand every region of the world (or at least know how to find out
about a specific country).

I hope this helps.

Thanks,

JDS

Terence H Thorn@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/14/99 05:22 PM
To: James D Steffes@EES, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Nicholas O'Day/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Shapiro@EES,
Harry Kingerski@EES, Scott Bolton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Hap Boyd@ENRON, Joe
Hillings@ENRON, Ricardo Charvel@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean@EES
Subject: Working Groups

We've all been looking carefully at the working group lists trying to decide
who belongs on what group,  what the focus of the groups will be, and where
they can bring expertise and make the greatest contribution or perhaps be
involved in a new area that will add to their knowledge and experience. Since
Steve wants to finalize the groups close of business Friday,  it would be
great if each of you could put out a brief description of the working group
or Maureen could put out a composite that includes answers to these questions:
What will be the primary focus of the group? What types of issues will be
dealt with?  What type (skills, experience, perspective) will you be looking
for? For example, Joe Hillings has a huge 41 company association working on
the WTO/Energy Services negotiations that draws and involves people across
Enron.  Joe- what will be the focus of this new group and what incremental
value do you see it adding. Is there one special area that isn't being
addressed? Or are you formalizing the informal group we already have working
in this area?  Is the plan to sign up for a group and then collectively
decide what to work on? Quite simply, what's the charter?

Others questions that we can discuss together on Friday include:  Who is the
customer for the work product? If an area of compensation/performance
evaluation is based on the success and participation in these groups,  who
decides if the product is valuable or the group was a success? How do we
determine the greatest value project? Where is the interface with the
commercial people? Isn't  the bottom line contribution the ultimate
determinator of success? How do we seek and involve people outside Houston
who aren't involved in a topic area, someone like Stella Chan in Korea or a
member of the India team? People who would benefit from greater exposure both
for their growth and contribution.

We have a wonderful opportunity with the consolidation of these groups to
formalize a system that transfers knowledge and experience across Enron. We
also have tremendous existing work loads, we are some what resource
constrained so that participation in these groups has to make a high value
contribution to Enron's commercial challenges.  These are great general
topics with strong  leaders.  Let's take the next step and zero in on the
details.


Sara - per my voice mail, I am forwarding you a copy of the long form
confirmation that Peoples has suggested we use prior to an ISDA between
Peoples Energy Corp. and enovate, L.L.C.  We would like to execute on this
Gas Daily option early next week so your input on the most expedient
documentation is extremely appreciated.  Any questions, please give me a call.

Thanks,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000
03:30 PM ---------------------------

p.burgener@pecorp.com on 10/13/2000 02:59:38 PM
To: gregg.penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA

Gregg,

Can you have the appropriate people on the ENE side review this document
which we hope to use in the interim between PEC and enovate, L.L.C. for the
Gas Daily Option deal (Financial).  We hope to transact by very early next
week, which may need some quick turnaround.

Thanks,

> ----------
> From:  Jacobsen, Fred
> Sent:  Friday, October 13, 2000 2:49 PM
> To:  Marozas, Brian
> Cc:  Burgener, Paul
> Subject:  RE: Enovate/PEC ISDA
>
> Attached is a form of long-form confirmation.  Also, we will need a
> guaranty from Enron.  We would be looking for a guaranty similar to the
> one they provided for the PEC/ENA ISDA, only for 50% of the obligations of
> enovate.  Thanks, Fred.
>
>  <<Form of Long Form Confirmation (10-13-00).doc>>
>
> ----------
> From:  Marozas, Brian
> Sent:  Friday, October 13, 2000 10:31 AM
> To:  Jacobsen, Fred
> Cc:  Burgener, Paul
> Subject:  RE: Enovate/PEC ISDA
>
> Fred,
>
> Please send a long-form confirmation template to me and Paul Burgener.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
>   ----------
>   From:  Jacobsen, Fred
>   Sent:  Tuesday, October 10, 2000 1:39 PM
>   To:  Marozas, Brian
>   Cc:  Nassos, John G.; Huprikar, Aparna
>   Subject:  RE: Enovate/PEC ISDA
>
>   Brian,  I just spoke with John Nassos and he indicated that
> although we would prefer to enter into transactions only after the ISDA
> and supporting documentation are in place, we could employ a long-form
> confirmation if Enron is agreeable to do so and (i) the enovate risk
> policy is executed and (ii) we receive a guaranty from Enron for 50% of
> enovate's obligations or we are willing to proceed without a guaranty upon
> the approval of Jim Burns and Aparna Huprikar.  Thanks, Fred.
>
>    ----------
>    From:  Marozas, Brian
>    Sent:  Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:32 AM
>    To:  Jacobsen, Fred
>    Subject:  FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA
>
>    Fred,
>
>    Since we can't do a long-form, how close are we to
> finalizing the ISDA with Enovate?
>    PEC must purchase this product before November and
> is subject to price movements (See FYI).
>
>    Thanks,
>    Brian
>
>    FYI - We have to purchase the financial product
> ASAP.  The price of the financial product has gone from $963 K to $1,106
> K.   We have lost $143 K.
>
>    ----------
>    From:  Jacobsen, Fred
>    Sent:  Thursday, September 28, 2000 8:24 AM
>    To:  'Sara.shackelton@enron.com'
>    Cc:  Nassos, John G.; Huprikar, Aparna; Marozas,
> Brian
>    Subject:  Enovate/PEC ISDA
>
>    Sara, attached below please find drafts of the
> following ISDA documents to be entered into between Enovate, L.L.C. and
> Peoples Energy Corporation:
>
>    1. Schedule to Master Agreement
>    2. Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
>    3. Exhibit A to Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
>    4. ISDA Master Agreement
>    5. ISDA Credit Support Annex.
>
>     Please contact me via e-mail or at
> 312-240-7284 with any questions  and comments. Thank you, Fred.
>
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Form of Long Form Confirmation (10-13-00).doc


Full Day URL <http://westdesksupport/RT/AtcFinalComp/?startHour=1&endHour=24&reportDate=01/09/2002>


Would you like to be secure in your financial future?

Have enough money to retire how you want to and when you want
to?

Or even have the ability to send your children to the colleges of your
choice, without regard to cost?

THE PROPER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT MAY BE THE
ANSWER!

For additional information reply visit
http://www.websurfking.net/opportunity

You now have the opportunity to purchase real estate in one of the
most progressive markets nationwide!

***Fully rented***
***In place Management***
***Priced $58,000 below construction cost***

You can own a beautiful brick apartment building for as little as
$6,200 down.

**Enjoy a comfortable retirement**
**Save on taxes**
**Provide for your, or your children's future**

For additional information reply visit
http://www.websurfking.net/opportunity

To be removed from our mailing list please visit
http://www.websurfking.net/money/remove.html


Wes, several months ago I sent you a memo (which I have attached to this
E-mail for ease of reference) describing that the State of Texas had notified
the Tax Department that it intended to audit the tax returns for Risk
Management & Trading Corp. ("RMT") for  the 1998 through 2000 tax years.
Greg, this is the legal entity about which I spoke to you several months ago
and of which you serve as its Senior Management.  We were recently notified
by the State of Texas that it had completed its audit and review of RMT's
returns and that NO ADJUSTMENTS would be proposed.  As I outlined in my
earlier memo to Wes, the RMT arrangement has increased earnings of Enron by
approximately$30 million since 1997.  The Tax Department is extremely proud
of our defense of Enron's interests in this matter and I would be delighted
to speak with you about this should you desire.  Best regards.  SHD.


Please unsuspend and bill the following Jan CES deals

Deal  Pipe volume  Amount  Comment
145311  ANR 5071  11992.92 we billed the Trunkline piece of this deal.
145317  ANR 37975  89810.88
145319  ANR 16275  38490.38

Still researching the following deals

Deal  Pipe volume  Amount  Comment
149430  ANR 34248  76030.56 sent email to Tom Donoho to research.

I will be in after lunch.  I may try to send you more deals.


No problem.  Just arrange it with Angela.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Michael J.
Sent:	Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:59 PM
To:	Zufferli, John
Cc:	Greenizan, Bill
Subject:	Etag 1.7 Training

I was looking in to the up-coming training sessions for the new etag system that OATI is rolling out on October 25, 2001.  They have two different training sessions, a one day workshop that is for experienced users and does not include any hands-on training, and a two day training session that includes hands-on training.  The two day session however, includes a second day of training on NERC Policy 9 regarding congestion management that may not be overly important to Calgary operations.

OATI says that version 1.7 is drastically different from the current software and training is highly recommended.  I was thinking that it would be a good idea to send one of us to the 2-day training session and then that person could pass on the information to the other 3.  I think, by the sounds of it, we would only need to attend one day since the second day deals with the NERC policy for the eastern interconnect only.

There is a training session that runs on October 1-2 in Minneapolis.  I am off those days, and would be more then happy to attend.  I can take care of all the registration and travel planning with Angela if you would like.

The cost of the session is $250 for 2 days, or $150 for the first day only.  There are only 8 spots left for this session.

Let me know what you think.

Mike


(See attached file: Sweets_Wedding_Letter.doc)
(See attached file: Sweets_Wedding_Letter.doc)
 - Sweets_Wedding_Letter.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: mkahl@ka-pow.com [mailto:mkahl@ka-pow.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 1:08 PM
To: Delaney_Hunter@ka-pow.com
Cc: lysherif@yahoo.com
Subject: Self-gen draft.

Attached is my first cut on self-gen.  It is, of course, subject to further
client and legal review but is, at least, something to shoot at.

  PLEASE FORWARD THIS DRAFT TO THE FULL TECHNICAL GROUP SINCE I DON'T HAVE
THEIR E-MAIL ADDRESSES IN MY COMPUTER.

(See attached file: draft self-gen bill.doc)
 - draft self-gen bill.doc


As most of you know, in a last ditch attempt, we are trying to develop a
complete "solution" to the California problems that can be presented in the
Sec of Treasury discussions.  It would be very helpful if people would
comment or provide analysis on the likelihood of the following settlement
points:

1. Long-Term Contracting
key need of CA is NEW POWER PLANTS - KEY MESSAGE - AND IT'S IN CALIFORNIA'S
AUTHORITY TO DELIVER
Live Auction conducted by DEALBENCH
auction should be focused on "build" economics
parties bid ($/Mwh) for the right to deliver 500+ MW (the right size needs to
be determined) into Cal ISO control area for 5 years and the winning bidder
obtains a pre-approved generation site in California (with all permits,
siting obligations, and interconnection - BIG ISSUE) to build starting within
2 months
focusing on just delivered energy without generation site is difficult to
price (market too illiquid)
keep the number of auctions to a minimum (probably 6 - 10) for each utility
Counterparty is State of California (some agency)
maybe structure the bids to be 50-50 baseload vs. peaking

2. Utility Retail Ratemaking
per RELIANT ENERGY model, need $85/Mwh on average to work within retail
framework (how much would rate increase does this create?)
goal must be to have EBITDA positive utilities, although long-term utilities
should be EBITDA = $0 for generation sales
keep the current PX structure?
Utilities may have to "eat" some of the current undercollection

3. Interim Credit Support
pro rata credit from all creditors (including banks and energy suppliers)
60 day forbearance (to allow the auction to occur)

4. Liability
PG&E, SDG&E, and SCE agree not to sue any suppliers
State of California considers "taking" all civil cases and not pursuing
State of California agrees not to pursue any criminal cases

5. Other Actions
FERC agrees to immediate price cap lifting
FERC and California agree to complete non-stakeholder board for ISO
CPUC immediately finds that the result of the auction is "reasonable"

The key point is to (1) stop the current bleeding by getting long-term deals
in place soon and (2) manage the rate shock.  We will be working three things
(1) structure of the long-term auction, (2) rate model showing how high
prices of long-term auction power can be, and (3) financial results for
utilities under this outcome.

What else needs to be included in a settlement?

Jim


Follow-up on Monday California conference call, regarding passthrough of the 1 cent surcharge.

SCE:

Does NOT appear to be passing through the 1 cent surcharge to Direct Access.

In a letter to the PUC's Energy Division on June 19, SCE said:  "By incorporating both the 1 and 3 cent per kWh surcharges into the generation component of total rates in Advice 1545-E, SCE has effectively exempted DA customers from these surcharges by including them in the new DA credit. ..  SCE, however, is not entirely sure whether the Commission intends to exempt the DA customers from the 1 cent per kWh surcharge and has previously requested Energy Division's opinion on this matter."

This letter was responding to a request by AReM for clarification of this very issue.  In a prior Advice Letter 1529-E, of April 5, SCE seemed to say that the generation rate (that forms the basis of the PX credit) does not include the 1 cent surcharge.

So, SCE seems to think the PUC has been unclear about whether the 1 cent surcharge applies to Direct Access, and as a result is not billing it to Direct Access.  This is in spite of the PUC's January 4 order, where it said "All other customers, including direct access customers, are subject to this surcharge." (p. 21)

Of course, it is not at all clear what SCE will do if the PUC clarifies for SCE that they could have been billing the surcharge to Direct Access customers.

PG&E:

Is passing through the 1 cent surcharge to Direct Access.  PG&E's Advice Letter 2119-E, of May 22, clearly exemps Direct Access from the 3 cent surcharge only.

Where are the $$ from the surcharges going?

March 27 PUC Order of Commissioner Lynch:

"PG&E and Edison shall enter the revenues from the rate increases into balancing accounts and the revenues shall be subject to refund if, at a later date, we determine that the utilities failed to use the funds to pay for future power purchases.  The revenues the utilities have collected and continue to collect from the one-cent per kilowatt-hour rate increase authorized on January 4, 2001 shall be used to pay for power purchases and not for any other costs incurred by the utilities. " (p. 55)

"It is reasonable that a certain amount of the revenues from the rate increases will be provided to DWR for its power costs, once DWR provides us with its revenue requirement. " (p. 51)

So, the utilities have been directed to hold the money from the surcharges in balancing accounts pending the PUC's acceptance of DWR's revenue requirement.

Call me with any questions.


Apparently you can't open the link so here's a print screen of the website.


How about the Lay's wednesday?


http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/archives/2000/nov/10/511018638.html?
tom+carroll


Mr. Derrick would like to invite you to attend a presentation by the law firm
of Winston Strawn in the 50th floor board room of the Enron building on
Wednesday, June 27, 2001.  The meeting will start at 9:00 a.m. and run about
2 hours.  Please plan to attend, if possible.

So far, the following individuals from the law firm of Winston Strawn will
attend.  This is a preliminary list, so please allow for the possibility of
substitutions or additions to their roster.

Joanne Gregory
Bruce Toth ) Corp.
Jerry Farano ) Broadband
Steve Molo ) Litigation
Chris Mcisaac ) Energy Project/Facility Deals
Chris Chase
Charlie Papavizas ) Maritime
Tim Oxley ) Finance and/or
Andy McDonough - Finance


Thanks, same to you.

I was not here on the day so this is late but best wishes.


no problem...i've been good, just busy with the new job.  all of the sudden i actually have time to do things so i spent the last weekend just trying to get my life re-organized.  not a very exciting weekend, but extremely necessary.  what's up with you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nguyen, Michael
Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 12:09 PM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	RE: socal gas?

thanks...so how have you been lately?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan M.
Sent:	Friday, April 27, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	""Nguyen, Michael" <Michael.Nguyen@ENRON.com>@ENRON" <IMCEANOTES-+22Nguyen+2C+20Michael+22+20+3CMichael+2ENguyen+40ENRON+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate
Subject:	RE: socal gas?

looks like the curve was marked around 9.0625 for jun/sept...but you'll have to talk to keith holst to get an absolute price

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Nguyen, Michael" <Michael.Nguyen@ENRON.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Nguyen+2C+20Michael+22+20+3CMichael+2ENguyen+40ENRON+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, April 27, 2001 1:32 PM
To:	sscott5@enron.com
Subject:	socal gas?

hello,

quick question on gas, ma'am..what's basis for june/sept gas call?

thanks,
mn


You can reach me on my pager at 888.916.7184, and during the day, Ginger and
Maureen can get a hold of me as well.  All the offices in the Capitol are in
the same building--so it's possible to get from one to other in about 5
minutes.  If there's anything else, don't hesitate to contact me.

Best,
Jeff


Dec. 21, 2000
Teco Tap  0.000 / Enron ; 18.750 / HPL Gas Daily

Dec. 22, 2000
Teco Tap  30.000 / Enron ; 80.417 / HPL Gas Daily

Dec. 23, 2000
Teco Tap  0.000 / Enron ; 6.250 / HPL Gas Daily

Dec. 24, 2000
Teco Tap  40.000 / Enron ; 110.000 / HPL Gas Daily

Dec. 25, 2000
Teco Tap  40.000 / Enron ; 110.000 / HPL Gas Daily


Thanks


_________________________________________
If you are serious about buying a
New car, Truck or SUV,
then you owe it to yourself to see just how much you can Save!!
Let us help you get a  FREE price quote on your next new vehicle!
Just follow the link below and take 30 seconds to complete a price quote request form.Click Here to SAVE
_________________________________________


Here's my "final" draft incorporating comments from West Trading, Steffes,
Kaufman (limited, due to time constraints) , Dasovich , and the latest back
and forth on the level of the cap.

In the end I did not reorganize sections as I thought that would cause to
much craziness with the lawyers who are trying to x-reference the document.
Frankly I think the order of the arguments in the affidavit are less
important than in the pleading.

Alan Comnes


I think I tried to send this to you yesterday but failed.  Please handle.
Call me with any questions (503) 464-8862.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 09:12 AM
---------------------------

Susan J Mara@ENRON
02/14/2001 11:15 PM
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT,
rcarroll@bracepatt.com, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, gfergus@brobeck.com
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice:  Extension of time regarding the EOB February 9 sub
poena

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 11:08 PM -----

	"Fuller, Don" <DFuller@caiso.com>
	Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <SHapp@caiso.com>
	02/14/2001 11:52 AM

		 To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: CAISO Notice:  Extension of time regarding the EOB February 9 sub
poena

Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

Attached please find a letter from the Electricity Oversight Board extending
the deadline for submission of responses to the February 9 subpoena
(attached also) to February 21, and correcting dates for items 1 - 7.   As
noted in the notice sent on Monday, the ISO will mark as confidential
information subject to tariff provision 20.3.2, and request confidential
treatment pursuant to the Electricity Oversight Board letters setting forth
agency opinions on confidentiality dated July 20, 2000 and July 28, 2000.
In accordance with tariff section 20.3.4, Market Participants requiring any
further confidentiality protections should contact the Electricity Oversight
Board directly and notify the ISO (please contact Jeanne Sol, at
916-608-7144, jsole@caiso.com <mailto:jsole@caiso.com> ).  The Electricity
Oversight Board contacts are Erik Saltmarsh and Lisa Wolfe who can be
reached at 916-322-8601.

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - Subpoena.pdf
 - caisosub4.letter.doc


You are awesome.

Linda Robertson
04/13/2001 03:58 PM
Sent by: Lora Sullivan
To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Carin
Nersesian/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Cheney Meeting Briefing Book

Attached is the Briefing Book for the 10:00 AM (EDT) Cheney meeting on
Tuesday, April 17, 2001.

We will be making additions to this book over the weekend, and a final
document will be ready for Ken Lay and Steve Kean on Monday evening.

By fax we are sending the attachment documents which were not available to us
electronically.


The PEP system is no longer available to accept feedback from reviewers.  If
necessary, you can still call the employee's reviewers who have not submitted
feedback via the PEP system.  Verbal feedback can be included as part of the
consolidated review .

The following is a list of action items for next steps:

ACTION ITEM	DEADLINE

Print Consolidated Feedback 	Wednesday,  Nov 22
Thanksgiving Holidays	Thursday- Friday November  23-24
Review/Approve Employees Peer Group and Supervisor  (HR will provide report
by 11/22)	Tuesday, November 28
Pre-Rank Employees based on Consolidated Feedback	Tuesday, November 28
Send Pre-Rankings to Norma via encrypted e:mail	Wednesday, November 29
Mark Haedicke will review Pre-rankings	Thursday, November 30, 2000
ENA Legal PRC Meeting	Tuesday, December 5
Written/Verbal review provided to employee	December 20-January 20
Signed Review Form due to HR 	January 27, 2000

Forward to appropriate parties, with sensitivity of the confidentiality of
this information.  If you have questions regarding the PRC process please
feel free to call me.

Norma Villarreal
X31545


make a Personal Connection!  1-800-FLOWERS.COM
    Spray Roses with Grandmother Book  Spray Roses with Grandmother Book     Dear LARRY,  A grand occasion is almost here! Grandparents Day is Sunday, September 9th, and it's the perfect time to thank Nana and Pop-Pop for sneaking that dollar into your pocket when you weren't looking.  Our Grandparents Day Collection  has gifts for every sentiment, from delicious gourmet goodies to the finest collectibles and, of course, the freshest flowers. With a few quick clicks you can thank Grandma and Grandpa for all of their love and support with the perfect gift.  You can now receive 10%* off.  Simply enter promotion code GP1 at checkout.  It's never been easier to show them they're grand!  From your friends at 1-800-FLOWERS.COM
 Visit us online at 1800flowers.com or at AOL Keyword: 1800flowers    Offer expires 9/18/01.  You are subscribed as: lcampbel@enron.com

      Mille de Fleur Arrangement  Frame with Julep Cup Set  Chrysanthemums with Grandparents' Photo Album  Mary Engelbreit
 Teacup for Her  Mille de Fleur Arrangement  Frame withJulep Cup Set  Chrysanthemums withGrandparents' Photo Album  Mary Engelbreit
Teacup for Her

  Personalized Greetings  | Gift Certificates  | Member Benefits  | Gift Finder         Remove Me  | Contact Us  | Security & Privacy  | Disclaimer*  | Store Locator

[IMAGE][IMAGE]


Ben,

Rick Winsor's note below has prompted me to provide a timeline with regards
to the issue of Zilka's concerns with our Availability calculations.

5/2/02
Rick Winsor states on a Mill Run noise issue conference call that Gary
Verkleeren has "scrubbed the data" from the Jan thru March time period and
arrived at a 92% to 93% availability figure. Rick also states that SCADA and
operational procedures have inflated availability.
While on the conf call, I stated that we would be very interested seeing the
data as well as the methodology utilized by Zilkha to arrive  at these
numbers and that we would work diligently to resolve the discrepancy between
our numbers and theirs.  Rick replied that the information would be sent
soon. Michael Miller, Michael Payne and Tom Nemila were participants on the
call.
5/15/02
Kurt Anderson sent an e-mail to Gary V. requesting the information regarding
the availability and reiterating our desire to resolve this issue.
Gary V. replied with the data and a copy of a letter he sent to Rick W. that
outlined the methodology utilized in Zilkha's calculations.
Gary V's e-mail stated that he wanted to review the data with Joe Thorpe to
"explain the basis and reasoning applied to the calculations" with the intent
that Joe would then share this information with Tehachapi.
Upon receipt of the data I immediately forwarded this info to Hollis
Kimbrough and requested that he review it and provide comments to Joe, in
order to prepare Joe for his meeting with Gary. Hollis responded with an
e-mail to Joe dated 5/16/02 in which he clearly indicates his concerns with
the methodology utilized by Zilkha. Additionally, Hollis and Joe spoke at
length regarding this issue.
5/21/02
Joe T and Gary V. met and reviewed Zilkha's availability calcs, during this
meeting Joe T outlined our concerns with Gary's logic and  methodology. While
in the meeting, according to Joe, Gary V stated that he may have made some
errors and that he wanted to recalculate the availability. This was the last
word Joe heard from Gary V regarding this subject.
5/23/02 Rick Winsor sends the note in which states that we "shrug off their
inquiries", to Michael Zilkha, who then forwards it to Steve Zwolinski,
Colleen Repplier and you.

Benjamin Bell
05/27/2002 05:21 PM
Sent by: Benjamin Bell
To: Lois Woodland/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Dan Lindquist/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Kurt
Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Joe Thorpe/EWC/Enron@Enron, Hollis
Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: FW: GEWE reporting and follow-up

Lois:  Please schedule a meeting this week (preferably late Tues or Weds)
with the cc'ed group above and help coordinate a conference call with Rick
Winsor at Zilkha towards the end of the week.  Thx, Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Bell/EWC/Enron on 05/27/2002
05:35 PM ---------------------------

Benjamin Bell
05/27/2002 05:17 PM
Sent by: Benjamin Bell
To: Michael@zilkha.com
cc: steven.zwolinski@ps.ge.com, colleen.repplier@ps.ge.com, Joe@zilkha.com,
mskelly@zilkha.com, rwinsor@zilkha.com, Dan Lindquist/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Thorpe/EWC/Enron@Enron, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: FW: GEWE reporting and follow-up

Dear Michael,

We, too, enjoyed the opportunity to meet with you last Thursday and
appreciate the candid feedback you and Michael were able to give us regarding
the PA projects.  We are currently investigating your and Mr. Winsor's issues
regarding availability, noise, blades, electronic faults, and cold weather
faults.  I suggest we schedule a conference call with our Operations team and
Mr. Winsor this week to clarify and resolve any issues you may have.  We
appreciate your business, and look forward to serving you better in the
future.

Best regards,
Benjamin Bell
GE Wind Energy
661-823-6827

Michael@zilkha.com on 05/23/2002 11:40:05 AM
To: steven.zwolinski@ps.ge.com, colleen.repplier@ps.ge.com,
benjamin.bell@ps.ge.com
cc: Joe@zilkha.com, mskelly@zilkha.com, rwinsor@zilkha.com

Subject: FW: GEWE reporting and follow-up

I wanted to thank all three of you for coming to meet with us this morning.
It is very exciting to have GE in this business. I am forwarding the
following e-mail since I thought you would want to know what the feelings
currently are in the trenches at Zilkha in terms of the PA projects. The
projects were commissioned six months ago so I can understand the frustration.

We look forward to seeing you at AWEA and to a long and fruitful relationship.

With best wishes,

Michael

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Rick Winsor
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:15 PM
> To: Michael Zilkha
> Cc: Michael Skelly
> Subject: GEWE reporting and follow-up
>
> Michael,
>
> I spoke with Michael Skelly about your meeting this morning with GEWE and
he suggested that I might give you something specific on certain GEWE issues.
>
> We are drafting a formal letter to GEWE to express our concerns with their
overstating of availability and general unresponsiveness to issues.  In our
view their performance is unacceptable.
>
> Along those lines, attached is an analysis of availability for the January
- March period for both Mill Run (10 machines) and Somerset (6 machines). The
attachment shows in the second last column the GEWE reported availability and
in the third last column an availability number we determined after
significant data analysis.  We believe that GEWE overstates their
availability numbers by up to 4%.  We have shared this information with GEWE
personnel but they quite frankly just shrug off our inquiries.
>
> Issues on noise, blade failures, electronic failures, cold weather faults,
etc. are not at all adequately responded to by GEWE and we will be
reiterating in our letter this concern.
>
> Also attached is an e-mail of today regarding Gary's observations on GEWE's
April reports.
>
> Have a safe trip home.
>
> regards
>
> rick
>
>
>
> >  <<Mill Run & Somerset Monthly reports>> > >  <<Availability.zip>>
>
>
>
>
> Rick Winsor
> Zilkha Renewable Energy
> 1001 McKinney, Suite 1740
> Houston, TX 77002
>
> rwinsor@zilkha.com
> www.zilkha.com
> Telephone  713-571-6640
> Direct        713-265-0244
> Fax           713-571-6659
> e-fax          253-541-8837
> Cellular      713-870-5504
>

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Mill Run & Somerset Monthly reports
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:03:58 -0500
Message-ID: <C4F6659E22D8194B925933CC808802540FC15D@server4.zilkha.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Mill Run & Somerset Monthly reports
Thread-Index: AcICc2zvlTjbDznqRMKWdw4R6bKDng==
From: "Gary Verkleeren" <GVerkleeren@zilkha.com>
To: <kurt.anderson@ps.ge.com>
Cc: "Rick Winsor" <rwinsor@zilkha.com>, "Mark Haller" <mhaller@zilkha.com>,
<joseph.thorpe@ps.ge.com>

Kurt,

I have a few questions relating to the Monthly Reports prepared for the Mill
Run and Somerset Wind Farms.  They are as follows:

* On April 5th the Main Circuit Breaker located within the pad mounted
transformer on WTG#7 at Mill Run was torn apart and replaced by Marvin Blanco
(GE Turbine Tech.).  In addition, on or about this same date IGBT's were
replaced within the same turbine.  Nowhere in the Monthly report are these
issues mentioned, please explain?

* WTG#9 at Mill Run experienced downtime between 4-17-02 at 10:00 A.M. and
4-24-02 at 4:00 P.M. this equates to 7 days - 6 hrs. or 7.25 days.  Assuming
WTG#7 operated fault free the entire month (its availability at 100%) except
for the above mentioned period of 7.25 days, the best possible availability
that could be realized would be            (1-(7.25/30) x 100) = 75.8%.
Please explain how the availability of this turbine can be 78.6% as listed in
the Monthly Report?

* On 4-25-02 WTG#8 experienced several hours of repair time due to worn HV
cable which had been rubbing against the ladder rungs at the yaw deck level.
Apparently, the bundle of cables sways or moves during normal operation and
over an extended period it caused significant wear to the protective
coating/insulation.  Why was this not mentioned?  Are other turbines
experiencing this problem?  Is there a retrofit being considered?

* On 4-28-02 a storm event with heavy winds rolled through the area.
Turbines #2, #3, and #8 at Mill Run all experienced faults requiring
component replacements.  The Summary on individual turbine activity in the
monthly report does not reflect this, neither does the Consumption Log also
contained within the Monthly Report, please explain?  In fact, WTG#8 required
a new rack of IGBT's as a result of this storm event and no mention is made
in the report to an IGBT replacement for this turbine.  Furthermore, on
4-30-02 a new rack of IGBT's was installed in WTG#8 and they were blown upon
start up.  IGBT's are major components, As a minimum I would expect the
monthly reports to include major component failures/replacements.

* I need clarification on what exactly Section 7. EXHIBITS is attempting to
demonstrate.  Surely, this is not an attempt to list all faults that a
turbine experienced for the current month.  How are you selecting the faults
you choose to include on the list?  For example, WTG#4 lists one (1) fault
for the month and clearly that was not the case.  As one example, check the
operational activity for WTG#4 on 4-22-02 where it experienced multiple
faults among them "Gearbox Oil Pressure Too Low."

We have to have a better account of the operational history of these wind
farms through GE Wind Monthly Reports.  I understand that the company as a
whole has been consumed with many other tasks relating to the recent
acquisition and that your attention has been elsewhere.  Nevertheless, we
need to work together in order to improve the accuracy and attention to
important details that is lacking within these reports.

I look forward to working with you and Joe to make these projects better and
more accountable.

Best Regards,

Gary

Gary Verkleeren
Zilkha Renewable Energy
68 Braddock Drive
Ohiopyle, PA  15470

Office:  724 434-1542
Mobile: 724 554-0924
Fax:  724 434-1543

 - Availability.zip


TransAtlantic | The Atlantic Online | http://www.theatlantic.com

March 2, 2001

+ THIS WEEK ...

Last week we asked, If poets are the "unacknowledged legislators of the
world," what of journalists, in particular one Christopher Hitchens? This
week, in the latest installment of Atlantic Unbound's Soundings series, we
bring you the genuine article -- i.e., poetry -- in three side-by-side
readings of Andrew Marvell's seventeenth-century seduction poem, "To His
Coy Mistress," introduced in a brief essay by Linda Gregerson. Many have no
doubt read this anthology warhorse in high school or college English
classes ("Had we but world enough and time/ This coyness, Lady, were no
crime..." and so on). But we're willing to wager that you've never heard it
quite like this. The readers are three noted poets -- Gregerson, J. D.
McClatchy, and Heather McHugh -- each of whom knows how to perform a poem.
And Gregerson's introduction is a rare treat: a deviously smart, witty,
sexy, and original close analysis that you don't need a Ph.D. in English
literature to understand and enjoy. Imagine. No, don't imagine; see (and
hear) for yourself.

Also this week: the conclusion of Christopher Hitchens's exchange with
James Fallows, new recipes on Corby's Table, a bit of economic analysis
from Sage Stossel, and more.

Cheers,

Wen Stephenson
Editorial Director
The Atlantic Online

-------------------------------------------------------

+ In ATLANTIC UNBOUND, The Atlantic's online journal ...

Fallows@large
THE WORK OF WORDS [PART THREE]
Mar 1 |  "I am in the uncomfortable position," James Fallows writes to
Christopher Hitchens, "of holding a widely caricatured view, which I will
try to defend. Namely, that Clinton's actions in the past six weeks justify
a harsher view of him than his previous conduct did. The contrary case is,
'What took you so long?' In this analysis, Clinton is behaving no
differently now from the way he has over the past eight years. My case is:
the way Clinton behaved in his final weeks in office, above all with the
pardons, actually was different from his previous record." See Hitchens's
reply to Fallows in the concluding round of their exchange on writing,
politics, Henry Kissinger -- and Bill Clinton.
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/fallows/jf2001-02-21/fallows3.htm

Soundings
MARVELL'S "COY MISTRESS"
with Linda Gregerson, J. D. McClatchy, and Heather McHugh
Feb 26 | "Can this poem really be after what it purports to be after?"
Linda Gregerson asks in her introduction. "Can it, as a seduction poem, by
even the wildest stretch of imagination be designed to work? What kind of
woman would be successfully wooed like this?" Poets McClatchy and McHugh
join Gregerson as each gives voice to Andrew Marvell's "To His Coy
Mistress."
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/poetry/soundings/marvell.htm

Corby's Table
ISRAEL ON A BUN
by Corby Kummer
Feb 28 | " 'Why can't a country with two and a half million Jewish mothers
have better food?' Henry Kissinger supposedly moaned while conducting
shuttle diplomacy in the 1970s. Even today Israel isn't known for the
quality or variety of its restaurants -- although Joan Nathan, an
indefatigable expert on Jewish food and the author of monumental and
authoritative books on the subject, says that things have changed
enormously since the days when she lived there, in the early 1970s." Corby
Kummer looks at Joan Nathan's new book, *The Foods of Israel Today*, and
offers his favorite selections.
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/corby/ct2001-02.htm

Sage, Ink
FAITH-BASED ECONOMICS
Feb 28 | A cartoon by Sage Stossel.
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/sage/ss2001-02-28.htm

-------------------------------------------------------

+ In D.C. DISPATCH | from National Journal

Social Studies
FORGET THE MARC RICH PARDON. WORRY ABOUT THE SCANDAL
by Jonathan Rauch
Mar 1 | In the Rich ruckus, what is taking place is an attack not just on a
pardon, but on the pardon power itself.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/nj/rauch2001-03-01.htm

Legal Affairs
HOW THE MARC RICH PARDON COULD SPAWN A NEW PROSECUTION
by Stuart Taylor Jr.
Mar 1 | The prosecutors' most logical target is Rich, not Clinton. In
politics, it's more dangerous to give than to receive.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/nj/taylor2001-03-01.htm

Political Pulse
WHY ALL THE SMILES ON THE RIGHT?
by William Schneider
Mar 1 | Interestingly, conservatives see George W. as far more of a Reagan
conservative than Daddy Bush.
was.http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/nj/schneider2001-03-01.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY EDUCATION PROGRAM
Teachers, put The Atlantic's quality to work in your classroom withour new
Education Program. Affordable rates, FREE Teacher's Guide, and FREE
instructor's copy with each qualifying order. Please visit
http://www.theatlantic.com/teach/
for details or call toll-free,(877) 299-8577.

-------------------------------------------------------

GET A RISK-FREE TRIAL ISSUE OF THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY
TransAtlantic readers, you can receive a RISK-FREE trial issue of The
Atlantic Monthly magazine. Just fill in the short form at
http://www.theatlantic.com/free/
and we'll rush our next issue to you. No obligation.

-------------------------------------------------------

To remove your name from our mailing list, send an e-mail to
listserv@theatlantic.com with UNSUBSCRIBE TRANSATL written in the BODY of
the message (subject text will be ignored), or go to the TransAtlantic page
at the URL below, enter your e-mail address and select "Unsubscribe."
http://www.theatlantic.com/transatlantic/

If you would like help or more information, send a message to
listserv@theatlantic.com with the word HELP in the BODY of the e-mail.


Toby - Please post the provided capacity award posting immediately for a one
week time period.  Thanks.  Legal has signed off on the format.


I will not be able to attend.  -Sally

From:  Araceli Romero @ ENRON
            02/05/2001 05:36 PM

To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawn
Kilchrist/NA/Enron@Enron, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT,
Tod A Lindholm/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Barry Pearce/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Araceli Romero/NA/Enron@Enron, Mercy
Gil/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandy Lewelling/NA/Enron@Enron, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita
DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Giselle
James/Corp/Enron, Inga Latson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Risk Forum Luncheon - February 6, 2001

This is a reminder that the next Weekly Risk Forum Luncheon will take place
Tuesday, February 6th from 11:30a.m. to 12:30pm in conference room EB-2868.
Lunch will be served; consequently, if you are unable to attend please advise
accordingly.

Thanks
AC Romero
3-0402


per voicemail
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/13/2000 09:23 AM -----

	Mike.Train@emrsn.com
	11/09/2000 02:41 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Thank You

Steve,

Thanks for arranging a great afternoon yesterday - - I very much enjoyed our
conversation on people and idea generation as well as gaining a good
overview of Enron's key businesses. The tour was extremely educational and
we had a good discussion with Nate Ellis on Retail Services at the end of
the day.

I like your idea of getting the top executives together at some point soon -
- I know our Chairman, Chuck Knight, would be very fascinated with the
transformation at Enron and your business models for future growth. He also
loves to share and contrast different management processes and I think all
involved would take away some ideas to consider. David Farr, our new CEO,
would gain much from such an interaction and hopefully the establishment of
a long relationship between our firms and executive teams.

On top of this, I see a tremendous potential for our firms to work together
in a number of key areas where our product and service technologies would
complement the Enron offering of market making and risk management. I
appreciate your offer to help navigate some contacts to evaluate some of
these opportunities. Some initial impressions include:

* Evaluating the use of Energy Services on a broad scale at Emerson
operations

* Evaluating the solution package that we could jointly put together for
industrial customers with your Energy Services group and our remotely
controllable transfer switch, UPS and back-up power technologies that would
permit remote (Enron) control of whether a site is on/off the grid or even
selling power back to the grid.

* Evaluate the potential packages of Emerson systems, measuring devices,
control elements, power diagnostic, remote monitoring and visualization
products and technologies for use with Energy Services contract offerings -
- especially in specific vertical markets such as retail stores, grocery
stores, pipelines, paper plants,  semiconductor fabs, etc. We have over 2000
service and solutions people spread throughout USA and other world markets
which could support this effort.

* Enron Broadband Services is already a primary user of Emerson fiber optic
conduit, precision air conditioning, UPS, and other power and connectivity
products and services - - we can evaluate how we can extend our technology
platform to support the bandwidth market making activity and the content
offering of Enron.

* I also see some potential for Enron finance and risk management in
international infrastructure projects such as the Caspian Sea gas
development - - where it looks like there will be 30+ years of gas
production - - some of the local customers who are intrigued with embracing
our new PlantWeb Fields technologies for better yield/uptime/asset
management have had trouble getting conventional project finance resources
to support their projects. Given Enron understands what to do with gas in
kind, there could be a very interesting triangular arrangement with Enron,
Emerson, and local gas production companies.

These are some initial thoughts - - I expect there may be several other
interesting possibilities come to light as we start to have additional
conversations.

Steve, again, thanks for the arrangements yesterday and I will be back to
you shortly to organize a follow-up set of conversations.

Best Regards,

Mike Train
VP Planning
Emerson Electric Co:
T: 314-553-2120
F: 314-553-3851


I am generally available in the afternoons after 3:00.  Have your assistant schedule some time either this week or next so we can talk about the Wellhead Book.

Thanks,

Tom


You didnt send this to SoCalGas, on purpose obviously.  What are we going to
do if we get way out ahead of them early on in this process?  Shouldn't re
reconnoiter with Bilas first?   Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:27 AM
To: Colin.Cushnie@sce.com
Cc: burkee@cts.com; craigc@calpine.com; Douglas.Porter@sce.com;
INGGM@sce.com; jdasovic@enron.com; MDay@GMSSR.com;
Michael.Alexander@sce.com; Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com;
rick.counihan@greenmountain.com; Tom Beach
Subject: Re:

Folks.  Let me throw out a proposal.  I believe that we should immediately
draft a very brief letter or press release that explains why the PD is
misguided and will lead to very bad energy policy for the state, and why
our settlement is the right one and why it's good energy policy for the
state.  The letter should be signed by everyone who signed the settlement.
It needs to be released by the end of this week.  Absent this kind of
action, nothing's going to turn this thing around.  Spending time and money
writing "comments" will be a waste of time and money.  We'll need to do a
lot more, but I think we have to start this way or fold up our tents now.
Thoughts?

Best,
Jeff

Colin.Cushnie

@sce.com             To:     "Tom Beach"
<tomb@crossborderenergy.com>
cc:     burkee@cts.com,
craigc@calpine.com,
11/27/2000           Douglas.Porter@sce.com,
INGGM@sce.com,
08:54 PM             jdasovic@enron.com, MDay@GMSSR.com,

Michael.Alexander@sce.com,

Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com,

rick.counihan@greenmountain.com

Subject:     Re:

I haven't had the opportunity to read the PD yet, but I share your
frustration with the Commission's inaction in the face of significant and
fast moving events.  Our settlement and electric restructuring are clearly
distinguishable.  Arguably, the status quo has, in part, perpetuated the
record high prices being observed of late.  The Commission should have
little to fear by proceeding with its initial direction of statewide
consistency in the intrastate gas industry.

"Tom Beach"

<tomb@crossbordere        To:     "Mike Day"
<MDay@GMSSR.com>,
nergy.com>                <Douglas.Porter@sce.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>,

<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>,
11/27/2000 03:19          <craigc@calpine.com>,
<burkee@cts.com>,
PM                        <Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com>,

Please respond to         <Michael.Alexander@sce.com>

"Tom Beach"               cc:     <INGGM@sce.com>,
<Colin.Cushnie@sce.com>
Subject:     Re:

If I'm reading pages 38 - 40 of the Bilas PD correctly, the Commission's
primary concern over the competitive benefits of city-gate pricing is the
fact that PG&E city-gate prices in October were much higher than border
prices plus transportation.  October bidweek PG&E city-gate prices were
high, but only because southern California prices plummeted from the high
levels that they had reached in late August and September, following the El
Paso explosion.  In November, the PG&E city-gate moved back into its normal
relationship with Topock and Malin prices.  For the Commission to be
spooked
by one month of price fluctuations is crazy.

I'm hopeful that my friends at Edison, in particular, can help the
Commission to distinguish what we were trying to achieve in the CS on the
gas side from the mess that is electric restructuring....

Tom Beach

----- Original Message -----
From: <Michael.Alexander@sce.com>
To: <Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com>; <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>;
<burkee@cts.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>; <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>;
<jdasovic@enron.com>; <MDay@GMSSR.com>; <Douglas.Porter@sce.com>
Cc: <Colin.Cushnie@sce.com>; <INGGM@sce.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 3:27 PM

> The PD in the Gas Restructuring is out.   I have yet to read the whole
> thing, but the title "Approval With Modifications Of The Interim
> Settlement..." does not bode well.  According to Steve Watson (and I only
> have Steve's statement second hand), the decision reflects a fear that
the
> timing is wrong in light of the current volatile gas price market.
>
> (See attached file: Proposed.doc)
>
> --
> Michael S. Alexander
> Southern California Edison
> 626-302-2029
> 626-302-3254 (fax)
>


It seems like several of you will be on vacation next week, so lets see if
we can do it this week.  Vince is available on Thursday from 2:00 - 3:00 PM
or Friday, from 1:30 - 2:30 PM.

Do either one of these two times work?

Let me know.

Thanks!

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
10:56 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
12/12/2000 09:20 AM
To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, James L Bouillion/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Carrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Follow-up Meeting on Wharton

Good morning everyone:

Vince would like to schedule a follow-up meeting on Wharton as soon as
we can agree on a time.

How does Monday the 18th look for you?  Vince is free from 9:30 AM -
11:30 AM and from 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM.

Please let me know if you are available during any of these times.

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw
3-5290


This sucks.  Don't mention this to any potential Enron new-hires.  Pay particular attention to what today is.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Black, Tamara Jae
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	/o=ENRON/ou=NA/cn=Recipients/cn=notesaddr/cn=a478079f-55e1f3b0-862566fa-612229; Abler, William; Aggarwal, Anubhav; Allen, Diana; Arora, Harry; Bailey, Debra; Ballato, Russell; Ballinger, Ted; Baughman Jr., Don; Benchluch, Moises; Benjelloun, Hicham; Benson, Robert; Bentley, Corry; Black, Tamara Jae; Blaine, Jay; Bolt, Laurel; Broderick, Paul J.; Broussard, Richard; Burnett, Lisa; Campbell, Larry F.; Capasso, Joe; Carson, Mike; Chen, Alan; Choate, Jason; Cline, Kevin; Collins, Dustin; Comeaux, Keith; Coulter, Kayne; Davis, Mark Dana; Day, Smith L.; Dean, Clint; Decook, Todd; Emesih, Gerald; Errigo, Joe; Forney, John M.; Freije, William; Garcia, Miguel L.; Gilbert, Gerald; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Giron, Gustavo; Greer, Andrew; Gualy, Jaime; Guerra, Claudia; Gulmeden, Utku; Gupta, Gautam; Ha, Amie; Hanse, Patrick; Hernandez, Juan; Imai, Rika; Ingram, David; Jenkins IV, Daniel; Kaniss, Jason; King, Jeff; Kinser, John; Larkworthy, Carrie; Laurent, Dean; Laverell, Justin; Lenartowicz, Chris; Lorenz, Matt; Lotz, Gretchen; Lowell, Thomas; Mack, Iris; Mahajan, Ashish; Makkai, Peter; Marquez, Mauricio; Maskell, David; May, Tom; McElreath, Alexander; Miller, Jeffrey; Oh, Seung-Taek; Olinde Jr., Steve; Pace, Andy; Padron, Juan; Pan, Steve; Philip, Willis; Podurgiel, Laura; Poppa, John D.; Presto, Kevin M.; Quenet, Joe; Rawal, Punit; Rodriquez, Andy; Rogers, Benjamin; Rust, Bill; Ryan, David; Saibi, Eric; Schiavone, Paul; Schneider, Bryce; Seely, Michael; Serio, Erik; Shoemake, Lisa; Simpson, Erik; Stalford, Robert; Stepenovitch, Joe; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Symms, Mark; Tamma, Ramanarao; Thomas, Paul D.; Trejo, Reese; Valdes, Maria; Vernon, Clayton; Wang, Steve; Williams, Ryan; Willis, Cory; Zipperer, Mike; Baughman, Edward D.; Clynes, Terri; Dalton III, Oscar; Kelly, Mike E.; Sewell, Doug; Valderrama, Larry
Subject:	Breakfast/Lunch/Snacks

Please be advised that starting October 29th we will no longer provide meals for the group.  Due to security and limited space for the new building we will have to stop the snacks and water as well.  The new building will have filtered water and soft drinks.  Please be patient, and for the next two weeks the menu will be as follows:

Monday		10/15		Wall Street Deli
Tuesday	10/16		Treebeards
Wednesday	10/17		New York Pizzeria (Pizza)
Thursday 	10/18		Wall Street Deli
Friday      	10/19		ON YOUR OWN

Monday		10/22		Wall Street Deli
Tuesday	10/23		Ninfa's
Wednesday	10/24		New York Pizzeria (Pizza)
Thursday	10/25		Wall Street Deli
Friday		10/26		ON YOUR OWN

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks for your understanding in this matter.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


It works!


fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 07:58 AM -----

	Ken Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	02/08/2001 10:07 PM

		 To: Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: 363 numbering

I think it would be very cool also and I would be willing to help as long as
I don't have to spend any time or money.  The best source for this kind of
help would be Steve Kean and Mark Palmer.

	Philippe A Bibi@ECT
	02/08/2001 10:34 AM

		 To: Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: 363 numbering

Ken,

I mentionned to Jeff that it would be cool if we could have a 363 (ENE) area
code for Houston he thinks its a great idea.
We need to lobby do you have any desire to help?

I know that in the overall scheme of things this is really not important but
I think that this should be followed up.

Let me know what you think

Regards

P.

---------------------- Forwarded by Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001
10:36 AM ---------------------------
From: Martin Bucknell/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/08/2001 10:11 AM
To: Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tony Alvarado/ENRON@enronXgate, Jenny Rub/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: 363 numbering

Philippe,

Here is an outline of the 363 numbering information we talked about, the
process is very complicated and may need us to set down with the senior
management to explain how it works and the implications, my suggestion is
that Ken Rice would be the best one to take it forward, as he understands the
market and has some profile as the head of a bandwidth / telecoms company

Tony Alvarado is the lead for this one, his extension is 37801 let me know
how you want to proceed


Kay, looks great to me.  I would prefer to leave the benchmark open and be
able to talk the counterparty through how it will be established (due
diligence on plants, higher target means greater sharing % for ENE).  As far
as cancellation is concerned, I think that it would be a good idea to include
a right of cancellation for NRG based on a percentage of the benchmark
established.  Something to the effect that NRG will have the annual right to
terminate the agreement if we cannot achieve __% of the annual gross margin
target.

Thanks-
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:36 PM
To: Keeney, William
Cc: May, Tom; Marks, David; Scheuer, Janelle
Subject: Re: NRG bullet points

I've made some revisions the Bill's document to make sure we are on the same
page before I prepare the LOI.

 << File: NRG Term Sheet.doc >>

Do we want to give any sort of description of how the benchmark will be set?
Do we want to mention the cancellation provisions?

Thanks,

Kay


Thank you

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Anderson, Clinton
Subject: Re: Copy of Master Agreement

If you are looking for a copy of an ISDA  Master Agreement with Exxon, there
is none.  If you are looking for a physical power master you need to contact
Rhonda Denton.  I have access to financial trading agreements only.

	Clinton Anderson/ENRON@enronXgate 05/23/2001 07:49 AM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Copy of Master Agreement

Tana:

Don Scott of Exxon Power Team contacted the EOL Call Center this morning
requesting a copy of his Company Master Agreement because it has been
misplaced.  I am not sure if you are the correct person to handle such
request.  Could you please assist or forward to the correct party responsible
for such a request.

Customer Info:

Don Scott
Exxon Power Team
610 765 6727  office
610 765 7727  fax
Dscott@pwrteam.com

Thanks for your assistance in this matter.

CA
EnronOnline Help Desk


A message addressed to you appeared to contain a virus. The message was
blocked. The subject line of this message may identify the virus.

You may want to contact the sender if listed here >> -
eadc@dc.energyadvocates.com - and request a re-transmission if you belive
important information was blocked. If no sender is listed, the sender did not
have a valid email address and it is unlikely the email had any legitimate
purpose.

 If you have questions, contact IT Security by email at compsec@pgn.com or at
503-464-7159, 8892 or 8555, or visit the website at
http://pgeweb/it_security/virus.htm


Looks like the changes are relatively minor, but I feel better!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000 03:40
PM ---------------------------

"William J. Harmon" <wjharmon@JonesDay.com> on 11/21/2000 02:51:55 PM
To: "Boyd J. Springer" <bjspringer@JonesDay.com>
cc: gregg.penman@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com

Subject: Re: Peoples Transaction

Attached is the "term sheet" with some suggested revisions (identified by
strikethrough and underlining).  We suggest that you simply call the "late
charges" interest rather than any other term.  This type of business
transaction is exempt from the usury statute in terms of any maximum rate
and thus it is best to make it clear that the late charge is "interest"
rather than something else.  The other changes I made were merely to
clarify the method of calculating the interest on overdue amounts.  I note
the the contract you provided does include a provision for interest on
overdue invoice amounts.  Under the contract, interest is the Citibank
prime rate.  I assume you will set this term sheet up as an amendment to
the agreement.
(See attached file: Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc)

Please contact us if there are any other questions.

Bill Harmon
wjharmon@jonesday.com
312-269-4160
Fax: 312-782-8585

                    Boyd J. Springer
                    Extension 54151      To:     Kay.Mann@enron.com
                                         cc:     gregg.penman@enron.com,
                    11/21/00 11:52         William J. Harmon/JonesDay@JonesDay
                    AM                   Subject:     Re: Peoples Transaction
                                           (Document link: William J. Harmon)

Kay: Bill Harmon from our office (312-269-4160) is reviewing the material
re deferred payment and will get back to you.

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========

 - Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc


The feeling is mutual.  Things are going good, even better if I could get out
of here at a decent time.  At least I don't have Susan's hours.  Are you
coming to her happy hour tonight?  Talk to you soon.
PL

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lisa Gillette                           02/15/2001 12:20 PM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Vic's Bonus

He got dairy queen coupons?  Mine wasn't even that good?

So how are you doing Phillip?  It was great to meet you Saturday - I had
heard so much about you; it was nice to put a name with a face.

Talk to you later,
Lisa

Phillip M Love
02/15/2001 08:10 AM
To: Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Vic's Bonus

So I hear you are stealing my man Vic's bonus check?  I am sure you didn't
open it up to see if it was deposited into your account.  From what I was
told it should have just been some dairy queen coupons.
PL


Jen, I would be pleased to attend - sorry for the delay on the e-mail.

Kay, please set up.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
03:36 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           08/31/2000 05:41 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meditations on Origination

Dave:
As a follow up to our conversations on the origination function within ENA, I
was hoping that you could join us at our middle marketing team meeting on
September 21 at 4:00 pm. I think it would be beneficial if you shared your
views on origination currently and its role (s) in the future. This would
also be an excellent forum for you to discuss ENA's short and long- term
goals.

If this date is not amenable to you, please let me know when you would be
available.

Regards,
Jen
34759


Wade, I have decided that everything currently in our system is incorrect.
Please set up a meeting with all the people shown above and we will discuss
how to correctly handle this in our system.  We also have some other supply
behind the LDC that we might as well handle correctly.
Wade, while we are at it, do you want us to look at NYSEG, CPA, and East
Ohio??? Any others?

People I need in attendance
Mary Theresa or Jeanne
Steve Gillespie
Angie
Sylvia Campos (or someone from the contracts group)

This is what I'm thinking, everyone please think about this before we meet.
I think I will have Peoples set up as a pipeline and we will move all the
deals to this new pipeline.
Steve, get the Peoples password from Angie.  I need you to go into escript
(Angie can help you with this) and run anything you can get out of this
system.  These are actually CES passwords.  It is my intention to use this
information to set up transport or pooling contracts in Sitara.

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           08/30/2000 06:46 AM

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie
Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeanne
Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT
Subject: Re: Phillips Production Co - PNG City Gate Production

Phillips Production has/had two seperate PNG deals:
 1.  500 MCFD; $2.82/MCF; 1/1/00 - 6/30/00
 2.  300 MCFD;  $2.95/MCF;  1/1/00 - 11/30/00
To my knowledge, PNG does not send out production information to either the
producer or the pool operator.  This information should be available on
E-Script.
 Phillips gets their production volumes (which they use to create our
invoice) from the company integrating the meter charts.  I beleive that this
is the same information provide to PNG.
John

	From:  Victor Lamadrid @ ECT                           08/29/2000 05:47 PM

To: Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gloria G
Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeanne
Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Phillips Production Co - PNG City Gate Production

Wade,  Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention. But I need help
understanding this one.  We have a process already to handle John's behind
the citygate deals

Since, the actual scheduling is done by CES in Virginia,  we never nominate
this gas nor do we see actuals.  We hear about them from John and Terry and
we are supposed to get confirms from the producer and CES.  Whenever one of
these deals occurs, we have buys from the producer and sales to CES to
account for these transactions internally.

It's my understanding that whenever John cuts one of these behind the
citygate deals;  that Terry puts it into Sitara for him.  The offset also
entered by Terry  is a sale to CES (Now the New Power Company effective Sept.
1) with commercial (usually Chris Germany) confirming the sale price.  Angie
schedules it in Unify under CNG and we create, track and balance like usual.

Is that not the case here?  Is this something that's getting reconciled in
Jeanne and Terry's project for CNG???

By cc: Angie, please get with Terry /Jeanne and Chris to help Wade.  THANKS!
Please keep me abreast of the status.

Wade R Price
08/29/2000 02:53 PM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gloria G
Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Phillips Production Co - PNG City Gate Production

ENA is being invoiced by Phillips Production Company for production on
Dominion Transmission (CNG) via Peoples Natural Gas.  This is
behind-city-gate gas that we do not get documents supporting the volumes. I
have invoices and production statements from Phillips.

Per John Singer Notes Mail of 08/23 concerning the July production," Phillips
Production / Peoples: Price:  @ $2.95/Mcf  Term:  1/1/2000 - 11/30/2000 Est.
Volume:  500/MCFD  (Actual Volume will vary.)   I have no way of verifying
the actual volume.  Chris Germany and Angie Zeman will try to get into CES's
PNG pool via E-Script.  This may be the only way to verify actual volumes.  I
have a call into Phillips to see if they might have a pipeline statement
verifying volumes."  Joihn's call to Phillips read partially,  " I just
talked to Sam Fragale @ Phillips.  The 7,843 Mcf @ $2.95 is ENA's. "

Our deals have been using point 20200 on Dominion Transmission (CNG).  Deals
for Jan 00 - Mar 00 were 210359 and 210364.  These were copied to 226543 and
229733 respectively for April 00 forward  Deal 226543 has April 00 only, but
should probably be extended through June-00 according to deal notes from John.
Here is our current status on this gas

Prod  Invoice  Invoice  Current
Month  Volume  Price  Unify Vol Sitara Deal

May-00  4801  @$2.82  163  226543 (has April-00 only, should extend through
June?))
  9748  @$2.95  353  229733

June-00  5341  @$2.82  0  226543 (has April-00 only, should extend through
June?))
  9394  @$2.95  0  229733

July-00  7843  @$2.95  9552  229733

We need to get our proccess together for handling this each month through the
end of the deal terms.

Please direct the appropriate parties to help make these invoiced volumes
available on the deal and in Unify so I can pay Phillips.

Thanks  WRP


Mary Hain has resigned her position with Enron.  Please remove her from all
your mail lists.

Thank you.

Lysa Akin
Gov't Affairs - Sr. Admin. Ass't.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "JOHN MAAS" <JMAAS@LLGM.COM>                           03/20/2001
06:07 PM

To: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com, Don.Hammond@enron.com, Mary.Hain@enron.com
cc: "ANDREA CHAMBERS" <AJCHAMBE@LLGM.COM>, "JOHN G KLAUBERG"
<JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>, "THOMAS J. MOORE" <TMOORE@LLGM.COM>
Subject: LVCII Interconnection Agreement

Attached is a draft of the above, blacklined against the original draft we
received from Nevada Power.  This draft also reflects comments from Dale of
this evening.  Let me know if you need anything further at this time.  JM

John Maas
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae
303-291-2614
jmaas@llgm.com

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

 - LVIIIAbl.doc


please don't forward this thanks..
---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES on 03/01/2000
03:12 PM ---------------------------

Rich Ferguson <Rich@Cleanpower.org> on 03/01/2000 03:04:45 PM

To:	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
cc:	Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES

Subject:	Re: Conference Call

Scott, it's hard to say. Hackney indicated there would be a revised
"principles" piece before long, so maybe we'll just have to wait. They do
have some legitimate concerns - if they're going to invest in distribution
system upgrades, they need to know what's going to stay in ratebase and
what's going to be competitive. There is a danger that the rules will
remain so murky that nothing will get done by anyone - something akin to a
reluctance to invest in generation so long as the ISO screws around with
must run contracts and congestion management schemes. We would probably all
benefit by knowing what the rules are going to be going forward.
On the other hand, it's hard to believe that SCE and the others don't want
to nail down everything in sight for themselves. However, there appears to
be a growing understanding that the farther they try to reach, the more
uncertainty they produce - they can't have it both ways.
Sooner or later there is going to have to be some consensus on what stays
regulated and what goes competitive. Don't know what you think the chances
are that it will be sooner, but at least it seems SCE is indicating a
willingness to engage in meaningful discussions that I haven't seen before.
Rich

At 01:32 PM 3/1/00 -0800, Scott Govenar wrote:
>You are absolutely correct Rich.  Rick gave us an idea of what Edison's
>evolving positions are.  Based upon what we now know, we are still strongly
>opposed to several of their ideas. How do you think those conversations are
>going?
>
>Rich Ferguson wrote:
>
> > John White, Rick Counihan and I met with Edison on Monday, and it appeared
> > that their position is still evolving on many of the issues of concern.
> > Folks in this discussion should be sure they are reacting to current
> > positions, so far as they can be discerned.
> > Rich
> >
> > At 10:47 AM 3/1/00 -0800, you wrote:
> > >We have scheduled a conference call for Monday, March 13 at 4:00 p.m. to
> > >discuss developments surrounding Edison's public goods mandates.  The
> > >call-in information is as follows:
> > >
> > >Call-in:        888-399-8606
> > >Passcode:    Enron


Check out "www.psa.com" for publications/agreements (including repos) which
you can download from The Bond Market Assoc. website.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2000 03:06
PM ---------------------------

Gabriel Monroy
04/06/2000 09:08 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal 218918, McIntosh Partnerships

Done,
Sorry, I thought somebody else had taken care of this.

Gabriel


We know about this don't we Judith!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 06:51
PM ---------------------------

Brenda H Fletcher
01/12/2000 09:19 AM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Storage Demand Issue

FYI - You may already be aware of this but I'm passing this on in case you
didn't know this.

BF

 ---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Coates/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 09:08
AM ---------------------------
From: Dave Nommensen on 01/10/2000 02:02 PM
To: Jeff Coates/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Storage Demand Issue

Storage deals require a meter on both the injection side and the withdrawal
side in order to bridge - even if there is only a demand charge.
A zone is not enough, it must have a meter.  Let me know if that works.

d.n.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jeff Coates                           01/10/2000 01:52 PM

To: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Storage Demand Issue

The deal was entered on friday 1/7,  and your right it never bridged over to
Unify.  I don't understand the location question,
the deal was set up like all other storage tickets.  I'm just trying to get
the demand to download so VM can draft it.


Jim,

I will be sure to call Pat on Monday.

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 11:46 AM
To:	Perrino, Dave; Keene, Patrick
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul; Walton, Steve
Subject:	NV Regulatory Work

Dave --  Pat Keene is working on a number of issues before the NV Commission on retail access and unbundling (one thing being the implementation of DA for C&I).  Can you please reach out to him to help on some transmission issues involved in retail competition.

Thanks,

Jim


The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.  Please review.

Owner: Mark L Greenberg
Report Name: Greenberg10/8/01
Days In Mgr. Queue: 9

Owner: Anne C Koehler
Report Name: AKoehlerSept01
Days In Mgr. Queue: 7


AGA for 2/16/01 is -81

Website information:
http://gasfundy.corp.enron.com/gas/framework/default.asp
Drop down Box to "Storage"
In-house Analysis
My files are the last three files.

When the dialog box asks to upadate links click "NO".


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
05:56 PM ---------------------------

"Webmaster@cera.com" <webmaster on 09/28/2000 01:57:57 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: CERA Web Call Replay Now Available - September 28, 2000

**********************************************************************
Power Crisis in California: Reregulation or Redesign?
(CERA Web Call Replay September 28, 2000)
**********************************************************************

Authors: North American Power Team, Western Energy Team
E-Mail Category: Multimedia
Product Lines: North American Power, Western Energy

URL:
For North American Power clients:?
http://eprofile.cera.com/client/nap/media.cfm
For Western Energy clients:? http://eprofile.cera.com/client/ce/media.cfm

In a September 11, 2000, CERA multimedia conference call and web
presentation, Larry Makovich, CERA Senior Director, Mike Zenker, CERA
Director, and Peter Moritzburke, CERA Associate discuss:

Power Crisis in California: Reregulation or Redesign?
* Tracing the problem: Structural flaws and strong fundamentals
* Possible paths for California
* Lessons learned and implications for other markets

To view and listen to a replay of this presentation,
please click on the link above.

**end**
*******************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://www.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html

Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


11/30 works for me.  See you both then.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Mary Cook
	11/17/00 08:28 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Lunch

11/30 looks ok to me.  Let  me know.  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Carol St Clair
	11/16/2000 11:22 AM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lunch

Mary and Sara:
Sorry that I had to cancel our lunch.  Here are some post-Thanksgiving dates
that work for me:
Monday, 11/27, Tuesday, 11/28, Thursday, 11/30, Monday, 12/4, Friday, 12/8.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Plan to attend a meeting concerning ENA's interest in an Audit of Entex.
Wednesday 15th at 3:00 in room 3125a.  I have reserved the room for one hour
but it shouldn't take longer than 20 min.

Thanks,
Janet


If we had a 'watch list' - - - - it may lend use as a 'cheat sheet'.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Balfour-Flanagan, Cyndie
Cc:	Gonzales, Sharon; Elledge, Susan; Hesse, Lisa; Ellenberger, Mary; Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	FW: Unimark: Faxed comments concerning pymt due date

One other thing I forgot to add:  we've already discussed having templates for those CPs with changed due dates, but we are waiting to see just how many CPs request these change.  Right now it's manageable and I don't want to have a bunch more templates to have to worry about.  It's easy enough to remember to change those new GTCs we set up now, so we'll just play it by ear.  If too many CPs request these changes that it makes it difficult for us to keep track of, then we'll set up new templates accordingly.

Please give me a shout if you have any questions.

Thanks!
SBR

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Balfour-Flanagan, Cyndie; Gonzales, Sharon; Hesse, Lisa; Ellenberger, Mary; Nemec, Gerald
Cc:	Elledge, Susan
Subject:	RE: Unimark: Faxed comments concerning pymt due date

Cyndie,

We get these requests from time to time, so it is not all that uncommon.  We are currently taking this on a CP-by-CP basis and not making any assumptions yet.   Gerald has already agreed that while the default payment date on the GTC states the end of the month, we CAN change the due date to the 25th with the CP's agreement.  Southwestern Energy Services is the CP we have changed already.  You might want to coordinate future changes with Lisa, Mary, Sharon/Susan.   And of course, please keep us all in the loop on any new CP's you need to have changed.

Thanks,
SBR

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Balfour-Flanagan, Cyndie
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:31 AM
To:	Richardson, Stacey; Gonzales, Sharon; Hesse, Lisa; Ellenberger, Mary; Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Unimark: Faxed comments concerning pymt due date

Per a 11/15/01 fax notice, Unimark wishes the payment dates be "Payment by wire on the 25th Day". Referenced deals: 1061122; 1062624; 1063968; 1061089; 1063576; 1146397; 1064010; & 1061084.

Okay, new kid on the block here:

I'd assume that it is a safe assessment that Unimark would prefer all future payments to be made on the 25th via wire. Lisa, is this something you'd confirm with Unimark (contact per fax is Cheryl Hartsell, phone#: 405-844-6200 ext. 228) or is this something I can do?

Mary, given where we are in the month I know that the payment details have already been established & that given the date that it is too late to process Oct production for payment today.

Stacey/Sharon: Please adjust the payment detail in Global so that the terms flow downstream to Unify for next month's production.

Also; Lisa, Mary, Stacey & Sharon - - - - how common are the requests for payment date adjustments? I'd assume (former life experience) that the larger producers or those who process royalty or related payments require payment on the 25th due to their responsiblities. If this is common - - - instead of repairing after the fact - - - - do we have a list of customers that we should automatically adjust the payment terms within Global & likewise to that of the GTC template?

Gerald - - - - Hi! I'm over here in Confirms now. What is your input on this issue or to that of the common occurrence? Also, as the 'new kid' - - - - are their any future protocols I should know of???

Thanks all!!!!
Cyndie


Deal is 507436 - Sean forgot the broker - it's been added.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/29/2001 02:25 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deal for sean c

selling mirant
feb
25 mw
240.00
palo

thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 05:55 PM
---------------------------

Enron-admin@FSDDataSvc.com on 09/11/2000 03:43:35 PM
To: scott.neal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: TIME SENSITIVE: Executive Impact & Influence Program Survey

***REMINDER***

We have yet to receive your feedback.  Your input is
very valuable and to be included in the participant's
summary report, it must be received BY CLOSE OF
BUSINESS Thursday, September 14.

The internet link and your ID are noted below.
Thank you for your participation.

___________________________________________
Executive Impact & Influence Program
* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program,
each participant is asked to gather input on the
participant's own management styles and practices as
experienced by their immediate manager, each direct
report, and up to eight peers/colleagues.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a
participant attending the next program.  Your input
(i.e., a Self assessment, Manager assessment, Direct
Report assessment, or Peer/Colleague assessment) will
be combined with the input of others and used by the
program participant to develop an action plan to
improve his/her management styles and practices.

It is important that you complete this assessment
NO LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS Thursday, September 14.

Since the feedback is such an important part of the
program, the participant will be asked to cancel
his/her attendance if not enough feedback is received.
Therefore, your feedback is critical.

To complete your assessment, please open your internet
browser and go to the following web site:

www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

Your password for each participant you have been asked
to rate is:

EWUF8P    (Phillip Allen)

If you experience technical problems, please call
Dennis Ward at FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you
have any questions about this process, you may contact
Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith
at Keilty, Goldsmith & Company, 858-450-2554.

Thank you for your participation.


FYI.  Edison has been successful at peeling off one of the ESPs--New West.  Seems that in exchange for getting paid negative CTCs, New West may have agreed to take the position that all DA customers should be charged for Edison's undercollection. I'm not aware of any other ESPs that are willing to take that position.  The salient quote in New West's "supplemental" PHC statement reads:

"It is the position of New West Energy that all customers, both bundled service customers and direct access customers, are equally responsible for payment of the net undercollections.  Fairness dictates that bundled customers and direct access customers are both assessed their fair share of the responsibility for repaying the amount of the net undercollections as may be determined by the Commission."

Obviously, not a helpful statement.  New West's supplemental PHC statement is attached.

Best,
Jeff


For your information.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 12:30 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Boston, Roy; Ibrahim, Amr; Chan, Stella; Scott, Susan; Roan, Michael; Herndon, Rogers; Merola, Jeff; Reinecke, Scott
Cc:	Hueter, Barbara A.
Subject:	FW: Indiana State Utility Forecasting Group draft report

Attached please find a report on forecasted energy prices and demand in Indiana.  Please forward to anyone who could use this info.
Thanks,
Janine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Blinzinger, Don (BT)" <DBlinzinger@bosetreacy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Blinzinger+2C+20Don+20+28BT+29+22+20+3CDBlinzinger+40bosetreacy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 12:07 PM
To:	Janine Migden (E-mail)
Subject:	Indiana State Utility Forecasting Group draft report

 <<SUFG Factors Affecting Indiana Electricity Price in Competitive Markets.pdf>>
This draft report will be featured at the 2001 Energy conference on November 8.  I mentioned this to you last week when we talked and thought you might find it of interest.  Thanks.
*************************************
This message is from BoseTreacy Associates  LLC     .  This  message and any attachments may contain confidential information, and are  intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the  addressee.  If you are not the  addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not  authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and any attachments, and we  ask that you please delete this message and attachments (including all copies)  and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at 317--684-5400.  Delivery of this message and any  attachments to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended  in any way to waive confidentiality.   All personal  messages express views only of the sender, which are not to be attributed to  Bose Treacy Associates LLC, and may not be copied or  distributed without this statement.
*************************************
 - SUFG Factors Affecting Indiana Electricity Price in Competitive Markets.pdf


Steve,

It was pleasure meeting you this morning.

Following is the MSA that we discussed this morning. I think all we will be
required to do is amend the agreement to read "telecommunications services
and bandwidth units".

Further, on Monday, I hope to send you a draft of an "outsourcing" agreement
between Enron Corp., and an affiliated entity.

Best regards,

Donald
----- Forwarded by Donald Lassere/Enron Communications on 08/21/00 05:14 PM
-----

	Cynthia Harkness
	08/18/00 04:08 PM

		 To: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Master Bandwidth Sale Agreement


As promised, I have attached for your records and files the 2001-2002 United
Way Board Roster.  Our United Way is committed to maintaining the privacy
(phone numbers and addresses) of our members.  Please know, this roster is
shared only with members of our board.

		 <<botintl01.doc>>

Administrative Coordinator - President's Office
United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast
2200 North Loop West  (77018)
Phone: 713-685-2764
Fax: 713-685-5556
E-mail: ajones@uwtgc.org
Website: www.uwtgc.org

 - botintl01.doc


We have recevied the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated 1/22/2001 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be distributed to Legal
and Credit.


Dale:

The product description looks fine to me.

Leslie

	Dale Neuner
	07/19/2000 06:58 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy M Norton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: US Power PJM Demand Product Type (Offered by the Weather Desk

This is a follow-up to my e-mail sent earlier. The Product Type has been
built in test and awaits your approval. Please offer that approval as quickly
as posible, as John Lavoratto is eager to see this offered on EOL.

Dale
3-9746


Recognizing Enron,s increasing worldwide presence in the wholesale energy
business and the need to insure outstanding internal controls for all of our
risk management activities, regardless of location, a global risk management
operations function has been created under the direction of Sally W. Beck,
Vice President.  In this role, Sally will report to Rick Causey, Executive
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.

Sally,s responsibilities with regard to Global Risk Management Operations
will mirror those of other recently created Enron global functions.  In this
role, Sally will work closely with all Enron geographic regions and wholesale
companies to insure that each entity receives individualized regional support
while also focusing on the following global responsibilities:

1. Enhance communication among risk management operations professionals.
2. Assure the proliferation of best operational practices around the globe.
3. Facilitate the allocation of human resources.
4. Provide training for risk management operations personnel.
5. Coordinate user requirements for shared operational systems.
6. Oversee the creation of a global internal control audit plan for risk
management activities.
7. Establish procedures for opening new risk management operations offices
and create key benchmarks for measuring on-going risk controls.

Each regional operations team will continue its direct reporting relationship
within its business unit, and will collaborate with Sally in the delivery of
these critical items. The Houston-based risk management operations team under
Sue Frusco,s leadership, which currently supports risk management activities
for South America and Australia, will also report directly to Sally.

Sally retains her role as Vice President of  Energy Operations for Enron
North America, reporting to the ENA Office of the Chairman.  She has been in
her current role over Energy Operations since 1997, where she manages risk
consolidation and reporting, risk management administration, physical product
delivery, confirmations and cash management for ENA,s physical commodity
trading, energy derivatives trading and financial products trading.

Sally has been with Enron since 1992, when she joined the company as a
manager in Global Credit.  Prior to joining Enron,  Sally had four years
experience as a commercial banker and spent seven years as a registered
securities principal with a regional investment banking firm.  She also owned
and managed a retail business for several years.

Please join me in supporting Sally in this additional coordination role for
global risk management operations.


I already know "Soldier's Joy," the great instrumental about heroine, and
number 6 on the list. Why don't y'all learn that while I learn "Red Haired
Boy" and "Old Joe Clark"?

LATE!

>From: Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
>To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
>CC: 'PP' <psellers@pacbell.net>, "'Prentice (Berkeley)'"
><psellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, 'Scott Laughlin' <scottwl@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Bluegrass Guitar - Top Ten Song List
>Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:06:07 -0800
>
>  <<Bluegrass Guitar - Top Ten Song List.url>> I found the list of songs
>you
>should request for the Lone Mountain Sisters Band.
>
>  http://www.bluegrassguitar.com/top10songs.asp
><< BluegrassGuitar-TopTenSongList.url >>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


- 10_17_01GO.xls
 - 10_17_01OH.xls


By the way, did they ever get the acknowledgments taken care of?