Yes, if by Aug 19 we don't have the strategy, we should file.

But we need a comprehensive strategy before the end of the week.  I hope to drive that to conclusion.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:33 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Sharp, Vicki; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Swain, Steve; Kingerski, Harry; Mellencamp, Lisa; Huddleson, Diann; Savage, Gordon
Subject:	RE: ISSUE:  SCE Failure to Apply Past Credit Due to Current Utility Charges

Jim, I am in complete accord with your assessments and recommendations.  If we don't have the strategy to which you allude in paragraph 1 figured out by August 19, though, don't you agree that we need to go ahead and file?  We're owed more credits for the  pre-January 18 period than we'll ever recoup through these bills so it is sort of a moot point as far as the recoupment effort is concerned.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:51 AM
To:	Williams, Robert C.
Cc:	Sharp, Vicki; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Swain, Steve; Kingerski, Harry; Mellencamp, Lisa; Huddleson, Diann; Savage, Gordon
Subject:	ISSUE:  SCE Failure to Apply Past Credit Due to Current Utility Charges

Bob --

Before we do anything on this issue, I would suggest that we need to have developed a strategy on a number of issues (primarily the proper reformation of the PX Credit calculation after Jan 18 and the application of the 1c/kwh surcharge).

On this issue, assuming that we haven't discuss the failure of SCE to apply our account's past credit with the CPUC (given that the bills were just received), I can't imagine that a federal court would look to favorably upon a legal action.

In addition, we have not identified where the "credits" are if they are not on the customer's accounts.

My recommendation is to first (a) work with SCE - have Jeff Dasovich run the traps and (b) discuss the issue with CPUC Division of Energy and see if there is a solution without Complaint.

If this doesn't get us anywhere before August 19, then it seems that to protect our interest we would need to file a complaint with the CPUC.  I am not opposed to LeBouef looking into federal action, but that seems a bit dramatic without first trying to exhaust our adminstrative remedies.

Please call me.

Jim

P.S. There is a meeting on the 1c/kwh surcharge with Janet Dietrich today at 1:30 in her office.  I think you should attend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 6:05 PM
To:	'caferguson@llgm.com'; 'jbennett@gmssr.com'; 'mday@gmssr.com'; Mellencamp, Lisa; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Mara, Susan
Cc:	Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki; 'jklauber@llgm.com'; Curry, Wanda; Huddleson, Diann; Dietrich, Janet; Black, Don
Subject:	PX Credit Claim

Now that we have the SCE bills showing that they are not going to credit past PX Credits against the T&D charges, here is the preliminary plan for challenging SCE's (and PG&E's anticipated) action.  As Diann explained, the bills begin becoming past due August 19, with late fees of 1.5% accruing thereafter.  Disconnect notices could be received 30 days thereafter, or about September 19.  Our target date for filing is Monday, August 20.

     1.  Charley Ferguson (LeBoef Lamb) will prepare an analysis of the pro's and con's of challenging the action in federal court versus at the CPUC (considering, e.g., bias of CPUC, timing, disconnect protection, etc.).  Charley will draft alternative Complaints.   He will get the input of the bankruptcy lawyers on the draft PG&E complaint.  I will circulate these drafts as soon as they are available.

     2.  Charley will first meet with Jeanne Bennett for a "download."  After that meeting he will likely also wish to speak with Wanda and Diann for additional background information.  (Thank you for your generosity with your time.)

     3.  I will check with Sue Mara to see what, if anything, the other ESPs may be planning to do to challenge SCE's action.  Not many still have direct access customers, but some do.

     4.  I will talk to Jim Steffes about an unofficial approach to SCE.

Please let me know if I have missed anything, and I would appreciate it if you would forward this along to anyone else who you think may like to have this information.  Thanks.


> >Heart Doctor & Mechanic
> >
> >A mechanic was removing a cylinder head from the motor of a
> >Harley, when he spotted a world-famous heart surgeon in his
> >shop. The heart surgeon was waiting for the service manager
> >to come take a look at his bike. The mechanic shouted across
> >the garage, "Hey Doc can I ask you a question?"
> >
> >The famous surgeon, a bit surprised, walked over to the
> >mechanic working on the motorcycle.
> >
> >The mechanic straightened up, wiped his hands on a rag and
> >asked, "So Doc, look at this engine. I also can open hearts,
> >take valves out, fix 'em, put in new parts and when I finish
> >this will work just like a new one. So how come I get a
> >pittance and you get the really big money, when you and I
> >are doing basically the same work?"
> >
> >The surgeon paused, smiled and leaned over, and whispered
> >to the mechanic...
> >..."Try doing it with the engine running!"
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
>
>
 -


Eric,  here are some questions from Peter, the AK lawyer who is working on
the contract. If you can respond by return email, Peter can keep this moving.

1.  Payee and Address for Invoices referenced in Section 6.7.2 of
the Agreement

 2. Section 6.7.1 Agreement reference [you might see if NEPCO has a reference]

 3. For the recitals, what is the kW capacity of its plant and where
is the plant located?

 4. According to the spreadsheet, the Guaranteed Delivery Dates for
Units 9-11 was 10/30/00.  The Guaranteed Delivery Date for Unit 12 is
11/30/00.  Are these still the dates we are using?

 5. Please provide the serial numbers for Units 9-12 for Section
10.2.1.

 6. Please provide the names, addresses, etc. for Sections 25.1 and
25.3

Thanks,

Kay


Most recent version.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001 11:42
AM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 03/30/2001 11:14:29 AM
To: "'gregorylang@paulhastings.com'" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>,
"'rvicens@deltapower.com'" <rvicens@deltapower.com>
cc: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Revised ENA/DAL Letter Agreement

 <<2XFL07!.DOC>>  <<2XFLRED.DOC>>

Gentlemen:

Enclosed are clean and marked copies of the revised draft of the letter
agreement between ENA and DAL.  The blacklined copy is marked to reflect
revisions from the prior draft dated March 16, 2001.  In the interest of
time, the revised letter agreement is being circulated prior to review by
our client, and is therefore subject to further comment from ENA.  If you
have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.  Thank
you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 136641v7
  136641vR7/5

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2XFL07!.DOC
 - 2XFLRED.DOC


absolutely not!  besides he hasn't talked to me since I scolded him for not showing up last time.  I think I reminded him too much of his wife!  His loss!  You need to get instant messaging.  Go to the AOL site or to MSN and sign up....its free.
Join the real world.  Besides, you employers can't track it!

love,

your sister

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Murdter [mailto:michael.murdter@rda.CO.Santa-Clara.CA.US]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:37 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: RE: Mercy

OK, as long as I can watch in the rear view mirror.

Shall I call him to extend an invitation?

-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana [mailto:Diana.Scholtes@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Michael Murdter
Subject: RE: Mercy

Is steve coming?  Then i will come down!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Murdter [mailto:michael.murdter@rda.CO.Santa-Clara.CA.US]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:01 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: RE: Mercy

The girls arrive at 10:35 pm this Saturday (Aug. 18), Southwest Flt.
2187.
Apparently your mother thinks they are coming tomorrow for some reason.
I
leave for Chicago on Sunday, return the following Wednesday and will be
driving up on Saturday Aug. 25.

Why don't you fly down Friday night and drive up with me?

-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana [mailto:Diana.Scholtes@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:30 PM
To: michael.murdter@rda.CO.Santa-Clara.CA.US
Subject: Mercy

Hey fruitcake.......

When does Elsa come in?  She can't find the itinerary and figures you
have it.  =)  Are you coming up here also?

love ya,

d

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042611.txt


I can come!


Louis has brought up a good point. Are we able to see positions non-PV? also can we get a seperate nymex equivalent basis position

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dicarlo, Louis
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 11:23 AM
To:	Parks, Joe
Cc:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Garza, Maria; Tian, Yuan
Subject:	FW: EES Price, Basis and Index Positions (as of 03.22.01)

Joe, the EES book data is getting closer to what we need but not there yet.

Please discuss w/ EES Risk (Scott Mills?):
1) The Price (NG) positions are expressed in PV'd quantity.  We need this data in nominal form in order to place the appropriate number of contract hedges through our NYMEX broker.
2) We need the NYMEX equivalent positions for basis so we can place NYMEX hedges as proxy for basis.

Maria has a call into Pat Ryder to determine whether the ENA Price positions are PV'd or nominal.  We may need those adjusted as well.

Please set up a meeting w/ Risk to discuss the concept of NYMEX equivalent basis contracts.  Include ENA and EES risk folks as well as me, Maria Garza, and Yuan Tian.  (Yuan is out today.)  As you commented, we need to determine that we agree with the methodology and conversion factor prior to including basis in the hedge quantity.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mills, Scott
Sent:	Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:44 AM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Parks, Joe; Dicarlo, Louis; Chilkina, Elena
Cc:	Ratliff, David; Draper, David
Subject:	EES Price, Basis and Index Positions (as of 03.22.01)

Attached is the information that we discussed last evening.

Please note the following -there are separate tabs for price, basis and index.
	The tabs that indicate "OXY II Only" are exactly that -the deals associated with the potential second bid from OXY for additional activity.
	The tabs that DO NOT indicate OXY II consolidate both the base keeper list + the OXY II activity.

If there is any doubt as to what you are looking at, check the first four lines or the worksheet.  There will be a designation of what is and is not included.

SRM


Discuss acctg. associated with certain operations initiatives:
Capitalization of compressor overhauls
Inventory sale (& buy back)
Inventory valuation


Mark Haedicke has four tickets to the Rockets vs. Vancouver Grizzlies game on
Friday, January 26.  These tickets will be given away on a first-come,
first-served basis.  Please reply by e-mail if you would like these tickets.

Thanks.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


Start Date: 10/11/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101123.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/11/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: SRP_EPMI_CISO
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


---------------------- Forwarded by Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron on 02/02/2001
03:35 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Eve Puckett                           02/02/2001 03:27 PM

To: Brenna Neves/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diane
Salcido/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lois Ford/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Peace/NA/Enron@ENRON, Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Gill/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Work Performance

Brenna,
         This probably isn't the best time to be mentioning this, and I don't
want you to think there is any motive behind it because reviews are currently
in process, but I wanted to briefly talk to you about Judy Hernandez:

I think she puts in a great work performance for many reasons:

1) She is ALWAYS willing to help out when someone is backed up on projects.
2) If you ask her to help you out with something, it's completed within the
same day or early the next day.
3) She is NEVER in a bad mood, and if she is she certainly doesn't let you
know about it nor take out her frustrations on anyone.
4) She is very knowledgeable when it comes to questions about deals being
acceptable or not.
5) If she can't answer your question she points you in the right direction
for it to be answered.

I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate working with her.
Thanks-Eve


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041608.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 8 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034741&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000034741
Request Create Date : 5/14/01 4:52:34 PM
Requested For       : jason.r.williams@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production Central View Only Settlements
Resource Type       : Applications


Hello,

I've added you to my smu-betas group at eGroups, a free,
easy-to-use email group service. As a member of this group, you
may send messages to the entire group using just one email address:
smu-betas@egroups.com. eGroups also makes it easy to
store photos and files, coordinate events, and more.

Here's a description of the group:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

With the assistance of Brother Shackleton, E.Wooglin.com has become a
reality.  This site will serve as a data base for SMU Betas to facilitate
planning and the organizing of reunions.  All the information members provide
the data base will be available to other members of our group as well.  This
should be helpful as we plan to travel and wish to visit brothers when we're
in the neighborhood.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's my introductory message for you:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello,

Welcome to the smu-betas group at eGroups, a
free, easy-to-use email group service.  Please
take a moment to review this message.

To start sending messages to members of this group,
simply send email to

smu-betas@egroups.com

If you do not wish to belong to smu-betas, you may
unsubscribe by sending an email to

smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com

You may also visit the eGroups web site to modify your
subscriptions:

http://www.egroups.com/mygroups

Regards,

Moderator, smu-betas

------------------------------------------------------------------------

TO START SENDING messages to members of this group, simply send email
to smu-betas@egroups.com

If you do not wish to belong to the smu-betas group, you
can unsubscribe by replying to this message, or by sending an email to
smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Regards,

Moderator, smu-betas

SPECIAL NOTE FROM eGroups:  Because eGroups values your privacy,
it is a violation of our service rules for moderators to add subscribers
to a group against their wishes. If you feel this has happened, please
notify us at egroups-abuse@yahoo-inc.com

P.S.  If you would like to learn more about the smu-betas group,
please visit http://www.egroups.com/group/smu-betas


fyi
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000 03:48 PM -----

	Sheila Walton
	12/20/2000 02:35 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Part Time Benefits

Here is the sheet for reduced hours employees.


---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000 08:36
AM ---------------------------

Scott Hendrickson
08/03/2000 08:33 AM
To: Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Brittney (sp?)


Click on the following  link to add the 'Financial Trading Agreements'
database to your Notes Workspace:

Link -->


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 04/20/2000 09:17
AM ---------------------------

Hap Boyd@ENRON
04/19/2000 10:28 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Enron Wind Policy Meeting

SK - I let Hap know that you will be attending.  mm

Steve,
I had sent you an email on a meeting to discuss Enron Wind's policy positions
and regulatory and legislative needs. The meeting will be held on Tuesday,
April 25 at 9:00 am in Kurt Huneke's conference room. Please let me know
whether or not you'll be able to attend. Thanks.
Hap


David,

I have attached a listing of all my Bid Week transactions.  Let me know if you
have any questions.

Kevin Ruscitti
(713) 853-6320


We have an active  Master Purchase/Sale Firm dated 10/1/97.  Do you want a copy?  Please let me know if you need anything else.

    dp

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Opps.  No, I don't have anything yet.  I got a message from Ben 2 hours ago
that said to hold off on Montana Power.  Did you hear differentlly?

	From:  Chris Booth                           04/02/2001 03:47 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Montana Power

Kay,

This is for the Westinghouse 501D5A.  Any progress on approving and
initiating the exclusivity agreement..

Chris

Kay Mann
04/02/2001 03:30 PM
To: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Montana Power

The issue is getting an assignment agreement that GE will sign.  I've
requested copies of the docs signed on the Pastoria deal, which is the most
recent GE frame assignment transaction.  That should be our starting point.

Kay

	From:  Chris Booth                           04/02/2001 03:28 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Montana Power

Kay,

Once we sign the exclusivity agreement, I would like to get MPC a draft of
the Assignment document for their review.  How long will it take to have a
version ready for MPC.

Thanks,

Chris


We negotiated the following discounts on Tenn and TGT

Tenn - all discounts are for the 27th only.

Z0 to Kinder k#2891	$.1421
Z0 to Tewksbury (Z6) k#2891  $.35

Texas Gas - discounts apply from 26th-30th.
SL Pool to Mamou k# T001886   $.0421


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 08:11
AM ---------------------------

Anne Bike@ENRON
12/26/2000 04:08 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, prices@intelligencepress.com, lkuch@mh.com,
SSPEAKER@ENERGYINTEL.COM, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron's Jan01 Fixed Price Physical Deals as of 12/26/00

Attached is the spreadsheet containing the details of the above referenced
subject.  Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or
comments.

Anne Bike


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 11:14
AM ---------------------------

Craig Breslau
12/19/2000 01:24 PM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ormet

Could you please send the service agreement into Koch for the Ormet
transaction.  This memo that I wrote to Scott details the rates that we have
negotiated with Koch.  Koch has to post our deal for five days, so could you
please try to send it out today if at all possible.  I am also sending you
the draft letter agreement that Koch sent to us which we will also need to
execute.  We will also need to put an IT agreement in place with Koch.  They
have offered the same discounted rates on an IT basis for any volumes above
the 15,000/d of FT.

Also, could you please arrange to put in place an IT agreement on Cypress for
delivery to Ormet Aluminum's Burnside,LA

Thanks for your help.

Craig
---------------------- Forwarded by Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 12:35
PM ---------------------------

Craig Breslau
11/16/2000 04:37 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Ormet

Scott:

Ormet's Burnside,LA Aluminum refinery is dually connected to Koch and Cypress.
The transport rates that  Koch has quoted for FT to Ormet are as follows:

From Bridgeline/Paradis or LRC/ Paradis .03 demand charge

from Venice     .05 demand charge

from the Mobile Bay pooling point on Koch .045 demand charge
(if we buy upstream of the pooling point then we would also pay a .0246
gathering fee on Mobile Bay)

In addition we will be charged .0022 ACA from any of these receipt points.

The fuel rate is 1.6%.  This will be passed on to Ormet.

Koch has agreed that any volumes in excess of the 15/d of FT will be at the
same discounted rate, but will flow on an IT basis.  If this IT is cut, we
still must use best efforts to transport from other receipt points on Koch or
on Cypress.  Ormet pays all additional transport costs.
Additionally, we have a price re-opener if Koch changes from monthly
balancing at any point during the contract term.
I am working with Koch to get secondary delivery points on Koch in the event
that the desk wants to take the gas elsewhere (i.e. if Ormet doesn't need the
gas or if you choose to deliver off of Cypress).  If you have any preferences
for alternate delivery points, please let me know.

As I mentioned, we  have already quoted NYMEX + .055 as the all-in delivered
price to Ormet.

Ormet would like to come to agreement on this transaction today (his wife is
due any day so he will be out of the office starting tomorrow).  They are one
hour ahead of us so your comments are greatly appreciated.

Thank you for all of your help on this deal.

Craig


Louise,

I spoke with Mark.  I believe he is getting a little more comfortable.  He is now focused appropriately on the likelihood of the bonds getting issued.  He is going to call around to some law firms and I will talk to some Bankers, just to get some other opinions.  I will have a short presentation for the meeting.

Cheers,

Chris


what about PrimeTrade (which is owned by CSFB)?

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	10/23/2000 08:44 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: CSFB

There is no signature block for CSFB, only ENA.

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 10/23/2000 08:25 AM
To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CSFB

Sorry to be so picky here, but do we also have CSFB's signature?

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	10/20/2000 03:30 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: CSFB

Sara -

We do have an executed agreement.

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 10/20/2000 11:55 AM
To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: CSFB

Sam/Stephanie:  Do we have an executed version for Global Contracts and our
files?


We need know everyday units need to be taken down and for how long.  Depending on system conditions we may have to allocate.

DS

	  From:  Kenneth Young                           05/31/2001 09:36 AM

To:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Randy Johnson/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Matt Francis/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Beebe/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jonny Hendricks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronnie Morse/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Carbajal/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ralph Mireles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Kingman-Sta1/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Flagstaff-Sta2/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Flagstaff-Sta3/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Gallup-Sta4/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Graves/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve SanMiguel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stoney Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary Maestas/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: TW 1090 Project Schedule - Stations 1-4

Darrell, unfortunately those who need to be at Station 4 are traveling back home from a PEP/PRC meeting we had in Albuquerque yesterday.

Time frame to analyze the malfunction unloaders should include 3-8 hours travel for the Analyst and Division Mechanical Specialist.  Presently, outage was requested for Wednesday, June 6th, from 8am to 6pm.  Initially, that outage was to accommodate program changes to the Unit Control program.  This outage also needs to include unloader inspection, which means there will be substantial downtime of Unit 401during the day.  Do I need to provide other information because unloader inspection will be performed?

We found out last Thursday which unloaders were not functioning correctly.  I have asked Steve SanMiguel to circulate a memo detailing which unloaders are not operating correctly.  This memo should be sent today.

If outage arrangements, other than the filling made for June 6th, can be made earlier, please let me know as soon as possible.  I will be on the road headed back to Amarillo today.  My cell phone number is 806-886-8105.   Otherwise, I will assume we will be on schedule to do this work June 6th.

Thanks
Ken N Young

Darrell Schoolcraft
05/31/2001 07:22 AM
To:	Kenneth Young/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Randy Johnson/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Matt Francis/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Beebe/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jonny Hendricks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronnie Morse/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Carbajal/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ralph Mireles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Kingman-Sta1/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Flagstaff-Sta2/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Flagstaff-Sta3/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Gallup-Sta4/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Graves/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve SanMiguel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stoney Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary Maestas/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: TW 1090 Project Schedule - Stations 1-4

Ken,

We currently have a unit down at Station 4.  If you need to work on something now is the time to do it and not wait until June.

DS

	  From:  Kenneth Young                           05/30/2001 11:50 PM

To:	Randy Johnson/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Matt Francis/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Beebe/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jonny Hendricks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronnie Morse/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Carbajal/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ralph Mireles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Kingman-Sta1/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Flagstaff-Sta2/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Flagstaff-Sta3/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Gallup-Sta4/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Graves/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve SanMiguel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stoney Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve SanMiguel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Gary Maestas/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	TW 1090 Project Schedule - Stations 1-4

I made a quick change to add analysis of Station 3 & 4 during the week of June 18th.

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


A reminder that the NERC Group call will be this Tues at 2:30 CDT (3:30 EDT).

Please call in if possible.  There are several pending issues to discuss.

1) Enron and EPSA members position on the formation of EISB  ( I will be presenting for EPSA on Wed at a GISB meeting at DOE)

2) Enron comments on the latest version of NERC Legislation (John Shelk summary is attached here)

3) Transition plan for responsibilities of Richard Ingersoll
	I have so far:
	- WSCC
		EPITF(date??), Steve Walton
		BOT (Aug 27)  - Ray Alvarez
		OCTPG (date ??) - Dave Perrino
	- NERC
		FBATF (Aug 30) - Charles Yeung
		Security Subcommittee (Sept 26,27) - Jose Bestard/Charles Yeung
		Stakeholder Committee (Oct 15) - James Steffes, Jose Bestard, Richard Ingersoll (Jim suggested Ray Alvarez, I 			want to discuss)

Dial in # 1-888-622-5357 / Pass Code 991504 / Host Code / 400555


Today's Hottest Travel Deals from Bestfares.com!

 EUROPE ON SALE: NEW LOWER FARES FOR SUMMER TRAVEL

We have just received new lower fares for more European cities for summer
travel (June 16 through August departures). For the next few days, you won't
find lower fares to Stockholm, Oslo, Copenhagen, Warsaw, Helsinki, Moscow,
St. Petersburg and many more destinations in Europe than we can offer. Our
best fares to Europe are for those who can depart by June 4, 2001. We have
London from $268 roundtrip; Paris from $322; Amsterdam or Brussels from $286;
Frankfurt or Lisbon from $308; Rome, Milan, Madrid or Barcelona from $358
roundtrip and many more. Check out our super low fares to Europe at
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=58

FINAL 2 DAYS: CAN YOU BELIEVE MEXICO FOR $158 RT THROUGH SEPT. 30, '01?

You can almost hear the ocean and taste the margaritas in Mexico with
airfares starting as low as $158 roundtrip. For the next two days, you can
purchase airfares to Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta, Mazatlan, Guaymas,
Hermosillo, Mexico City, Guadalajara or Cancun from as low as $158 roundtrip.
If you want to travel this summer for just a few pesos, think of our special
to Mexico. Visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=646

SUMMER FAMILY FARES: KIDS $98-$158 RT EXTENDED TROUGH SUNDAY

Our very popular family fares have been extended for ticketing through Sunday
April 29, 2001. With these fares, one adult can take up to two children (ages
two-17) for $98-158 roundtrip across the U.S., Mexico and Canada through
September 13, 2001. Our travel club that handles this promotion will stay
open until midnight (CDT) every day including this Saturday and Sunday to
accommodate those last minute bookings. Adult fares have also been cut up to
30 percent. This could be your last chance for great family fares. For our
coast-to-coast family fares, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=11653 for our
Alaska/Hawaii family fares, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=11664

And, for our Mexico family fares, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=11663

COAST-TO-COAST BETWEEN 58 U.S. CITIES $174 RT THROUGH SEPT. 10, '01

This summer, if you want to fly from Seattle to Fort Lauderdale or San Diego
to Providence, you can find airfares from Bestfares.com for as little as $174
roundtrip. Travel is valid through September 10, 2001. Portland (OR) to 34
U.S. cities is $174 roundtrip or Los Angeles coast-to-coast is $174-198
roundtrip. If you want to travel this summer a la cheap, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=15796

HOTEL RESERVATIONS NETWORK

Need a hotel room? Look no further because HotelDiscounts.com is the place to
find great deals at great prices. HotelDiscounts.com provides up to 70
percent off on hotels in major cities worldwide with guaranteed lowest rates.
Book online at
http://www.hoteldiscounts.com/cgi-bin/pickcity?SID=NW2&LKF=NW2

OVER 200 U.S. CITIES ON SALE FOR $162 OR LESS THROUGH SEPT. 10, '01

Where in the U.S. can you fly for under $162 roundtrip? Here at
Bestfares.com, we have over 200 U.S. city pairs on sale to save you big
bucks. How cheap? How about San Diego to Austin or San Antonio for $141
roundtrip with no fuel surcharge? Kansas City to Las Vegas, $125 roundtrip;
Nashville or Columbus (OH) to Las Vegas, $161; Los Angeles to Oklahoma City,
Columbus (OH), Little Rock, Omaha or Kansas City, $143 or less; New Orleans
to Tulsa, San Antonio, Indianapolis, Raleigh or Providence, $143 roundtrip.
Now, for the really cheap fares: New Orleans to Kansas City or Hartford, $99
roundtrip or Columbus (OH) to New York City, Boston, Philadelphia or
Washington (DC), $89. Remember, these are only a few of the cities that are
on sale this week. Check out
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=16526

FLY WITHIN EUROPE FOR ONLY $89 WITH LUFTHANSA'S EUROFARE

With Lufthansa's Eurofare, the most practical and economical way to do more
traveling in Europe, you can add up to six flight segments within Europe for
only $89 each. Until May 15, 2001, when you purchase a round-trip
transatlantic ticket on Lufthansa from any of its 14 gateway cities in the
U.S., you can complete it with a Eurofare ticket. As an added BONUS, with
your Eurofare, receive a $200 savings certificate redeemable on any jewelry
purchase of $500 or more at ICE.com, the world's premier online jewelry
store. For complete details on Eurofare and the $200 jewelry savings
certificate, see
http://www.lufthansa-usa.com/bf_efe_ap01.html

VANCOUVER & MORE AT UNBELIEVABLE SUMMER SALE PRICES

Vancouver, one of the coolest cities in Canada, is on sale at super sale
prices. We also have been able to waive the $40 fuel surcharge for this
special sale. Travel is valid through September 30, 2001. Here are some
sample fares: From Los Angeles, $158 roundtrip; from Dallas, Houston,
Chicago, Detroit, Orlando, Minneapolis, St. Louis and more, $218 roundtrip;
Atlanta, $238; Boston, New York City, Philadelphia or Washington (DC), $278.
We also have special fares to Toronto and other Canadian cities. Visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=55

CARIBBEAN SALE FARES FROM $328 THROUGH SEPT. 30, '01

It doesn't get much better than our warm and sunny, relaxing and restful
Caribbean sale. Travel to the Caribbean tropics is always a hot topic, and we
have some hot deals for you. Get away to the Caribbean islands for a relaxing
spring or summer sojourn. Fares begin at only $328 roundtrip for travel
through September 30, 2001. You can save up to 50 percent to a selection of
15 Caribbean cities, including Aruba, Bermuda, Cancun, Grand Cayman, Montego
Bay, Nassau and four other Bahamian destinations, St. Croix, St. Maarten, St.
Thomas, San Juan, and Santo Domingo. You can depart from over 40 U.S. cities
on the East Coast and in the Southeast from just $328 roundtrip. The average
published fares usually range from $658 to $798 roundtrip. From the Midwest,
fares are only $428 roundtrip and fares are $458 roundtrip from the West
Coast. To delight in Caribbean savings, make a break to
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=647

THIS WEEKEND'S ONLINE TRAVEL DEALS AT A GLANCE

We love to save you money but we like to save you time, too. Some travelers
spend hours looking for the best prices for last-minute weekend travel
getaways. Bestfares.com travelers can get the job done in minutes. Every
Wednesday, we compile current Internet specials into easy-to-use online
summaries. We cover domestic and international airfares, hotels and car
rental discounts, giving you comprehensive coverage for one-stop shopping.
Spot the deal that suits you best and get a jump on other travelers who will
be vying for the same seats, rooms and cars.

For This Week's Major Airline Internet Discounts,
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=17440

For This Week's Car Rental Internet Discounts,
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=17439

For This Week's U.S. & Canada Hotel Internet Discounts,
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=17438

For This Week's International Hotel Internet Discounts,
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=17437

You are currently subscribed to hot_deals as pkeavey@ECT.ENRON.COM
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-hot_deals-1835631U@hotdeals.bestfares.com

 Copyright 2001 by Bestfares USA Inc. All rights reserved.


Hey John,

There was a bug in the earlier version and the attached is the updated
version.  Sorry for the inconvenience caused.

Lindon Chiu
Technologist
Enron Corp
Voice: (800)973-6766 x 57758


Pursuant to Sara Shackleton's request, I am attaching a memo that I prepared
in April, 2000 regarding procedures for opening brokerage accounts.

Please do not hesitate to contact either Sara at x35620 or me with any
questions.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
Marie.Heard@Enron.com


Hi Sara, I have updated the file attached.  I ran a report of all financial
power trades done in 2000 and included all counterparties we have traded with
in 2000 on this list.  I bolded the counterparties that we are having confirm
issues with.  All of the counterparty names appear on this list as they do in
Enpower.

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886


Jana,

Too bad we live in Texas and our votes for Bush have no impact on the
national results.
I shall spread the message to other states that are more critical.

Vince


Shirley,

Please, register me, Lance and Alex for this event.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
04:42 PM ---------------------------

"Chris Farrell" <cfarrell@hesinet.com> on 12/22/2000 06:13:50 AM
To: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Henwood's 2001 ERCOT Symposium: January 23, 2001

Mark Your Calendar-Tuesday January 23, 2001 Downtown Houston Hyatt Hotel

Henwood will be hosting a comprehensive ERCOT Symposium on Tuesday,  January
23, 2001. A team of Henwood regional power market specialists will be
presenting the latest analysis and
information to assist you in preparing for the new ERCOT Restructured Power
Market, in addition to an anlysis of the issues now playing out in the WSCC
markets.   Coffee and registration will
begin at 9:30 AM  and the program will run until 3:00 PM.  Lunch and snacks
will be provided.

Agenda topics include:

* What will be the critica-success factors for qualified scheduling entities
operating in ERCOT's new wholesale & retail markets?
* How will market restructuring impact mid to long-term wholesale prices?
* What is the outlook for new generation?
* What are the impacts of upcoming emission regulations on ERCOT's generation
resources?
* What are the new analytical tools available to capture market uncertainty
impacts to your supply contracts and generation assets?
* What are the restructuring lessons learned from the California experience
and the implications to ERCOT?

In conjunction with this Program, Henwood will have a demonstration room
available to present its latest software applications and e-business
solutions. A nominal $75 registration fee is required
to reserve a space in the workshop.

For more information or to reserve your spot, please contact Chris Farrell at
Henwood: cfarrell@hesinet.com or 916/569-0985.

About Henwood: Henwood offers integrated business solutions, strategic
consulting, and innovative e-Business applications to meet the challenges of
the restructured energy markets throughout
North America, Australia, and Europe, serving clients that include eight of
the ten top utilities in North America, in addition to energy services
providers and power marketers.

If you want to be removed from our email list please reply to the sender and
put "REMOVE" in the subject box.


We're about 80 % done.  I gave Mark & Tanya a rough draft to look at
yesterday and am waiting back for comments.


Starting tomorrow (8/15), I will start publishing a load forecast for the North, West, and South zones in ERCOT.  The zonal forecasts will be run at the same time that the total ERCOT load forecast is being run.  I want to communicate how the zonal forecasts are being generated and the limitations of the zonal forecasts.

The zonal load forecasts are being generated using data from the ten old control areas.  I generate a load forecast for each of the old control areas and then portion out the loads in the appropriate amounts to each of the zones.  The reason I am generating a load forecast for each of the old control areas is for future use in the PowerWorld model.  I have load data through 12/31/2000 for each of these areas.  Each of the models is estimated from 7/1/1998 through 12/31/2000.  Since ERCOT is not publishing actual zonal loads at this time (let me know if that assumption is not correct), we are currently lagging nearly eight months of data and, obviously, this gap will continue to grow.  For these reasons, as well as the ones you are already aware of, East Power's forecasts of ERCOT's zonal loads could differ from the ISO's forecasts.

The zonal load forecasts are in the following location:

m:\electric\metrixnd\daily forecasts\first forecast\ERCOT Regional Load.xls (with tabs for each of the regions)

I will continue to publish a separate total ERCOT load forecast, the model of which is estimated from 1/1/1999 through 8/13/2001 (always containing the most current load data available).  The total ERCOT load forecast will differ from the sum of the zonal load forecasts due to the different estimation periods and the use of separate models.  A comparison between the ERCOT total load forecast and the sum of the zonal load forecasts shows that they are reasonably close.  You are welcome to do your own comparisons.

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
JOLLY, KEVIN                    MARNIE LAMB                     Oct 31, 2000


Got it.  Thanks.

Ron Gaskey
07/26/2000 02:45 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cove Point storage balance

Chris, I put a copy of the 6/00 Cove Point storage balance statement on your
desk. RG


Thought you guys would like some Christmas Lights.
BiLL :-)
---------------------- Forwarded by Billy Dorsey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/30/2000 11:06 AM ---------------------------

Jana Mills@ECT

11/30/2000 10:32 AM

To: Billy Dorsey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: FW: FW: Chirstmas lights for your computer

Hey!  This is what I was looking for!  Enjoy!
Jana

 - LIGHTS95(1).exe


I am having trouble pulling in the demand charge for 6/00 on deal 157278 for
$1,129.09.  The only thing that is different from May is that the demand
volume is 0.  I think it needs to be a 1 for the charge to come through.
Please take a look.

Thanks,
Megan


John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Baylor University, Finance Department
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
Phone: (254) 710 4473 (o) 4474 (sec)
 (254) 757 0852 (Home)
Fax  : (254) 710 1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Lorraine and Paul:   Greetings.  Our first invoice under our new firm
transportation agreement is incorrect.  I have asked our accounting people
to call Laura Giambrone to discuss but wanted to bring this to your
attention in case she needs your assistance to understand the terms of our
deal.  The invoice includes a "reservation" charge equal to the October MDQ
times the number of days in the month times the discount rate, which is
correct (35,000 x 31 x $0.08 = $86,800).  However, the invoice also includes
a "commodity" charge of $3,945.47.

I believe it is just a matter of setting it up correctly in the computer
because the invoices we received under our old contract also included a
"reservation" charge and a "commodity" charge, but the two together equaled
the negotiated rate.  I would appreciate any help you could provide to get
this set up correctly and our October invoice corrected.

Thanks,

Barbara Whittaker


Let me know what you think of the attached version.

	Karen Moore
	12/19/2000 03:56 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Michelle Cash made some changes which I have incorporated into this revised
document.  Please let me know if there is anything else that I can do.

Thanks,
Karen


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011412.txt


How does 9:00 work for everyone.  This is a very critical topic and needs to be discussed asap.

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturn, John
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Jolly, Rich; Roensch, David; Watson, Kimberly; Chanley, Earl; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Matthews, Ron; Geaccone, Tracy; wjdudley@nalcoexxon.com; tlsweeney@nalcoexxon.com; Graves, Jerry; Asante, Ben; Choquette, Gary; Kouri, Kim
Cc:	Rice, Randy; Harris, Steven; Norm Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON; January, Steven; Keller, John R.; Gottsponer, Morgan
Subject:	La Plata to Bloomfield Drag Reducing Agent Conference Call

Well, that didn't work.

Neither Thursday nor Friday at 2:00 will work.

I'll try one more time for this week.  Please let me know by noon, Thursday if you can not make any of these times:

  9:00 CST, Friday, 8/31
10:00 CST, Friday, 8/31
11:00 CST, Friday, 8/31

I will send a note by end of day, Thursday confirming the time and giving the dialing information.

Thanks,

John

---------------------- Forwarded by John Sturn/ET&S/Enron on 08/29/2001 10:35 AM ---------------------------
From:	John Sturn on 08/28/2001 09:19 AM
To:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron, Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron, wjdudley@nalcoexxon.com, tlsweeney@nalcoexxon.com, Jerry Graves/ET&S/Enron, Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron, Gary Choquette/ET&S/Enron, Kim Kouri/ET&S/Enron
cc:	Randy Rice/OTS/Enron, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron, Norm Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven January/ET&S/Enron, John R Keller/OTS/Enron, Dennis Alters/FGT/Enron

Subject:	La Plata to Bloomfield Drag Reducing Agent Application Proposal

I have been asked to pursue an effort to apply a drag reducing agent (DRA) to the La Plata to Bloomfield pipeline with the intent of increasing the San Juan lateral capacity.  I would appreciate it if you or your representative could participate in a conference call to initate this effort.

The desire is to have this done in the September - November time frame as December is a tariff month.  A launcher and receiver as well as other facilities to make the line piggable would have to be installed, cleaning pig runs completed and the DRA applied.

Please let me know by noon Wednesday if you cannot make either of these times:

2:00 p.m., Thursday, 08/30
2:00 p.m., Friday, 08/31

I will send a note by end of day Wednesday confirming the time and giving the dialing information.

Thanks for your help on this.

John Sturn
Optimization Team


Start Date: 1/12/02; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011212.txt


We will have our Monday morning conference call this coming Monday @11:00am
(CST).; For those of you in Houston, we will be in room EB4793.; Dial-in
details are as follows:
;
Dial-in number:; 888/311-9051
;
Pass code:; 60396
;
;
Sue Nord, Sr. Director
Government Affairs
713/345-4196
;


Attached is the Daily Termination List for January 25 as well as the Master Termination Log, which incorporates all terminations received through January 25.

The following were previously on the Master Termination Log and have now been marked as "Y" for a valid termination:

Atlantic Coast Fibers, Inc.			ENA		pulp/paper transactions
CNC-Containers Corporation			EPMI		master power agreement
Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County	EPMI		deal no. 757497.01
Connect Energy Services, Inc.			ENA		liquids agreement
NGL Supply, Inc. (including Premier		ENA/EGLI	physical & financial transactions referenced
Energy Partners, a division of NGL Supply, Inc.)
Plains Marketing, L.P.				ERAC		deal no. QG4563.1
Plains Marketing, L.P.				ERAC		deal no. QG4482.2

Stephanie Panus
Enron Wholesale Services
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490


URL <http://westdesksupport/RT/AtcFinalComp/?startHour=12&endHour=15&reportDate=01/08/2002>


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/05/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	5,686
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,199
Total Life to Date Transactions	499,401

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/05/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	4,845	79%
Enron Europe Limited	230	45%
Global Products	228	36%
Enron Metals	383	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	54%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	5,437,653,224
MTD	16,875,412,478
LTD	296,045,937,343
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,213,819,755

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	19,465,339,625

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	595
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	2
Number of Products Offered Today	1,162
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,274
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,913


FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kingerski, Harry
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Keene, Patrick
Subject:	FW: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

... some recent history.  I had left the message with Rogers Herndon.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keller, James
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Castano, Marianne
Cc:	Kingerski, Harry; Ogenyi, Gloria
Subject:	Re: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

You are correct!  This is not a new issue, but it seems to resurface on a regular basis.  The issue has been pointed out regularly (the first time in connection with the license and regularly thereafter) and each time the business has said not to worry, if they can't cut a deal with New Power they will just pay the $1/MW.  EES has assumed it will pay the $1/MW since day one!

	Jim

Marianne Castano
08/23/2001 08:33 AM
To:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Gloria Ogenyi/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Re: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Harry and Gloria:

Jim Keller and I have indeed dealt with this issue in the past (it actually came up at the time we were applying for our TX marketer license).

 It is my understanding, and Jim, please comment if my information is "stale", that we were going to choose the option set forth in Sec. 39.352(g)(3), which allows us to make a payment into the System Benefit Fund.  This approach was discussed with Dennis Benevides, and then, I believe, with Don Black, and they were OK with our pursuing this course, in lieu of having TNPC provide service to residentials on our behalf.

 Please call me if you have any questions:  814-835-0793.

Marianne

From:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/22/2001 04:06 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Marianne - per my voicemail.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ogenyi, Gloria
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Hamb, Edward
Cc:	Blachman, Jeremy; Gahn, Scott; Letke, Eric; Wood, James; Presto, Kevin M.; Curry, Mike; Wagner, Joseph; Misra, Narsimha; Dietrich, Janet; Collins, Patricia; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Herndon, Rogers; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Ed,

Residential Obligation
Section 39.352(g) of Senate Bill 7 provides that for any REP serving an aggregate load in excess of 300 MW, 5% of the load must consist of residential customers. A REP can fulfil this requirement by:
1. Demonstrating that it directly serves residential load amounting to 5% of its total load
2. That another REP serves the residential load on its behalf, or
3. It pays 1 dollar per MWH of required 5% load into the System Benefit Fund.
 EES can fulfil its obligation by entering into an agreement with New Power to serve residential load on its behalf, or can pay the 1$ per MWH penalty.
There is an annual compliance reporting requirement and EES can demonstrate compliance if it has an agreement with New Power.

EES Contract,
For price to beat customers, the utilities have by Commission rule, the obligation to allow customers to come and go without restraint for the 5 year period conmmencing 1/2/02. The Commission concern may be that Enron will abuse this provision by gaming the system. The Enron contracts as currently written are within the rules as approved by the Commission. Until the utilities move to amend the relevant rules, the Commission can only exercise its displeasure by appropriate oversight and enforcement to determine what conduct amounts to abuse and gaming. I think it will ultimately be a question of degree and pattern of switching. The onus will be on the affiliated REPs to prove abuse and gaming. Fundamentally, it is in the best interest of the market to allow customers to come and go. Customer mobility is the best customer protection in a competitive market. Besides, a restraint on customer mobility could have a chilling effect on competition as it will increase customer inertia. The Commission will carefully weigh any course of action to insure that they achieve a reasonable balance. For larger than 1MW customers, they can agree to long term contracts and a restriction on their ability to come and go.

Please call with any questions,
Gloria
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hamb, Edward
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Ogenyi, Gloria
Subject:	Re: Update: Enron Direct Telesales Initiative in NY, NJ and TX

To:	ehamb@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

get on this.  we need to discuss
---------------------- Forwarded by James M Wood/HOU/EES on 08/22/2001 10:20 AM ---------------------------
From:	Rogers Herndon/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/22/2001 09:27 AM
To:	Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kevin M Presto/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph Wagner/ENRON@enronXgate, Narsimha Misra/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Everyone -

I was just informed by EPMI that there may be a requirement for Retail Energy Providers in ERCOT to serve a certain mix of residential rate class/industrial rate class customers once a certain industrial threshold is crossed (300 Mw of industrial rate class load).

EWS has not set it itself up to monitor such requirements.  Therefore, I cannot comment on the accuracy or details of this requirement.  However, it is something we definitely need to look into.  In addition, we (EPMI/EWS) are getting feedback from the TX PUC that they are not pleased with how they see the pilot and the market structure unfolding.  Specifically, they are not pleased with retail energy providers' contracts that contemplate the right to switch between direct access and tariff (and visa-versa).  We will monitor and need to get more clarity on how the PUC intends to address their displeasure.

On the residential requirement front, someone needs to address this.  Specifically, is this true.  If so, what rate classes are considered industrial vs. commercial?  Is there a similar requirement for commercial load?  Is TI considered industrial?  Do we already have industrial customers in our portfolio?  Who in EES tracks and monitors issues like these as we enter markets?

Mike Curry is in the process of tracking this info down from an EPMI perspective as they are focusing on more of the pure, large industrial customers.  We will share any information Mike receives with the EES group.

RH

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042915.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


hey - just wanted to say happy birthday!  and, find out how you're doing -
perfect i'm sure.  you would totally laugh if you saw me right now - i'm
starting to look pretty darn preggo.  anyway - i may try to call you later
today.  take care.


Suzanne:
Thanks.

Sara and Susan:
If any of my "window" files need to be put other than in boxes, please advise
Suzanne.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Suzanne Adams
	08/17/00 10:24 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Moving

I understand there is an email out, which I haven't received, telling us that
the people will be moving back into their offices tomorrow.  The next phase
will start next week.  People have to be out of their offices by August
23rd.  That'll work out perfectly!  I'll have you packed up and hopefully
somewhere to put everything.  I've ordered boxes and packing bubbles for your
photographs.  Anyway, I'm sure you'll get a memo.  He must have put it on the
slowest possible method of getting to us.

Jim Grace came in yesterday, but I didn't say anything to him.  Dan, of
course, had to say "how's it going" or something like that.

Everything is fine here I guess.  I can't think of anything to report.  How
are you doing?


Dave,

Did you call Mark Koening?  He expected  your call as of Fri noon
when he left a message on my voice mail.

Vince


Gerald,

I have the Force Majeure letters from all of our producers that cut us for the storm. I have the confirm group pulling the confirmations for the affected deals. I will get this information to you as soon as I have it this afternoon.

Thanks,
Judy


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041715.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:  50.00 / Final:  49.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_TOBY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Last week, Enron Corp. announced a 2-for-1 stock split of its common shares
for shareholders of record on July 23, 1999. This means that each shareholder
will receive one additional share for every share owned.  The anticipation of
the impending stock split has resulted in a number of questions from
employees.  The answers to some of the most frequently asked questions
concerning the stock split and how it will affect your stock holdings are
listed below.

What is a stock split?

A stock split is an increase in the number of shares of Company stock without
a change in shareholders, equity or in the aggregate market value at the time
of the split.  For example, one share of stock with a value of $80 will be
converted to two shares of stock with a value of $40 per share.  The Company,
s total number of outstanding shares will double when the 2-for-1 split
becomes effective.

What is the effective date of the stock split?

The split will be effective August 13.  On August 16 (the first business day
following the split), the opening market price of Enron Corp. common stock
will be roughly half of the August 13 closing price.

How will the stock split affect my stock holdings?

Stock Options

If you have stock options, you will continue to hold options with an
equivalent value after the split.  If you have 1,000 options at a grant price
of $50.00, after the split you will hold 2,000 options at an adjusted grant
price of $25.00.  The vesting provisions and the option term will not change.

Savings Plan/ESOP/Phantom Stock/Restricted Stock

If you hold shares of Enron Corp. common stock or phantom stock through a
Company-sponsored plan (including holdings in the Employee Stock Ownership
Program (ESOP) and the Savings Plan), the shares in your accounts will
double.  For example, if you hold 100 shares in your ESOP account, you will
hold 200 following the effective date of the split.  And, if you hold shares
with a value of $2,500 in your Savings Plan account on August 13, the value
of your investment will remain essentially unchanged when the market opens on
August 16 (the first business day following the split).  The number of shares
reported on your 3rd quarter Savings Plan statement will reflect the stock
split.

Other Personal Holdings

If you own shares outright and hold the stock certificates, you will receive
new stock certificates.  Our transfer agent, First Chicago Trust Company,
will mail stock certificates to shareholders of record on or around August
13.  Your certificate will be mailed to the address on file with our transfer
agent, which is the address where you received your latest dividend check.
To correct your address, contact First Chicago Trust Company directly at
(800) 519-3111.  If your stock is held in a brokerage account, the shares
will be sent directly to your broker.  Note that if you sell your shares
between July 23 and August 12, the buyer of the stock is entitled to the
split shares.

How will the dividend rate apply to the post-split shares?

The current annual dividend rate is $1.00 per common share.  On a post-split
basis, the annual dividend rate will be $0.50 per common share.

If you have any questions concerning how the split will affect your Stock
Plan holdings, contact Corporate Compensation.  ESOP and Savings Plan
questions should be directed to Corporate Benefits, or your human resources
representative.


Sam,

Perfect.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           10/27/2000 08:59 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: newsletter lineup for Monday

Vince,

I have Lance Cunningham lined up for our "person of the week" and plan to run
part 2 of Maureen's article from last week.  Is this okay with you?

Thanks!

Sam


Following please find a summary of the minor Y2K related glitches that
various business units experienced following the rollover.  As you can see,
the problems we encountered were minimal indeed.  Testing of less critical
functions is ongoing and will continue through normal operations.

Enron Europe
ETOL - Power Station Optimizer application is not accepting data.  The
application is used for informational purposes only, and has no control
functionality.  Operations are not affected.  ETOL will have the application
repaired early next week.

London - Enpower Europe deal selection criteria is not working with date
criteria.  The application does function with deal numbers, however.  The
Houston application team is currently working on the problem.

London - Global Products Accounting has a minor data import problem.  The
problem does not impair daily operations.  Repair date is set for January 4.

Enron House - Fire detection system alarm lights do not turn off following
tests.  The problem is cosmetic only.  Also, remote alarm systems skipped
forward to the date January 31, 2000.  It is believed the problem is also
cosmetic only.

EOTT
Ticketing entry system had a minor problem which has already been repaired.

General ledger application has a program that displays the year 1900.  The
extent of the issue and whether the problem is cosmetic only, is being
pursued.

International Regions
Transredes, Columbia - The pipeline SCADA (Supervisory, Control, and Data
Acquisition) system failed shortly after midnight.  This means the pipeline
control center is not automatically receiving pipeline information.  The
system is used for information purposes only and has not affected operations.

Enron North America
ENA - Enpower deal selection criteria is not working with date criteria. Same
as item two of Enron Europe. ENA has already repaired the problem for North
American operations. Currently discussing European implementation timeline.

ENA - SIFT application has a Microsoft Import problem. This process is not
critical to daily processes conducted by Global Products. Same issue as Enron
Europe item three. Repair date is January 4.

FacSys 4.1 passing wrong date, 01/01/100 instead of today,s date of
01/01/2000, to the fax machine which prints on the banner information.
Remediation scheduled before January 4.

Remediated three Excel macros in the non-commodity trading function.


HI Tana

Here is the Amendment Agreement containg the additional "online" wording
agreed for the ECTRIC ISDA  that  Barclays want included in the ENA Isda. I
hope this is O.K. If you need anything else please call. Will also  enter the
new ISDA in data base ASAP.

Thanks

Matt Dawson

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT on 05/10/2000
16:22 ---------------------------

Justin Boyd
25/09/2000 15:53
To: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement

matt

 you will need to pass this by tana jones in the US for approval

j

Matthew Dawson
25/09/2000 15:03
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement

 Hi  Justin,

Just to let you know the Guarantee arrived from Houston this morning. I have
sent it on to Leigh. Also she requested that we amend the other Existing ISDA
Master Agreement Barclays has with Enron North America, dated 13 Jan 1994 to
include the Part 5(h) and(o)  wording dealing with  Procedures for entering
into Transactions(Online and others), and also the Part 6 wording dealing
with Additional Provisions for Commodity Derivatives Transactions.

I attatch her proposed amendment agreement. The wording of the clauses is
identical to that which was agreed in the ECTRIC  Master that has just been
signed, although the numbering of Part 5 (o) differs in the recent Isda with
ECTRIC. Barclays cannot trade with ENA until the Isda has been amended.  Are
we able to accommodate the   agreement?


Sara -- Thanks for the voicemail.  Attached is EWEB's proposed Schedule for
the Single Currency ISDA.  Perhaps we can arrange a time Monday afternoon to
discuss?  -Jim

 <<ISDA - EWEB Schedule for Enron.doc>>

 - ISDA - EWEB Schedule for Enron.doc


Guys,
Here is the draft of some of the ways of looking at the EGM businesses.  This is the starting template and it will become a living document that can be attached with your cash flow sheets and 2002 earnings summaries.  I would like your written comments and other views on these sheets/topics.

Obviously this is very confidential.

Thanks,
M


Are you going to do this or do you want me to?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald; Dickson, Stacy E.
Cc:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	New Master Physical

Gerald and Stacy -

Attached is a worksheet for a new master physical with Berry Petroleum Company.  Please prepare draft at your earliest convenience and contact me when ready.  I am getting the email address of the Berry Petroleum person to whom we need to send this.

Thanks,

Jay


PS - "Go Nuggets!" sounds like someone with a stutter saying "Go Nuts!"


Rock,

Irena wanted to know if you want flat screens for your computers.

Robin


Please see the report on the World Services Congress.

I. Exhibit

The WTO Energy Services Coalition booth was a great opportunity to spread the
word on the goals of ESC.  We manned the booth during the Global Marketplace
- the name of the exhibition.  We distributed hundreds of the one-pager on
energy services, as well as the bound ESC briefing book.  In the time I was
at the booth there was a significant interest in the ESC.  Thanks to Marc
Eichman for dedicating significant time to managing the booth and to the
Enron graphics department for the outstanding display.  Below find a photo of
our display:

II.  Energy Services Panel: How the Energy Services Industry Can Use Trade
Negotiating to Secure and Expand Markets

Chair:
Terry Thorn,  Senior VP, Enron
Panelists:
John Easton, VP, Int'l Programs, Edison Electric Institute
Ian Miller, President, EDS Global Energy Business
Tim Richards, Sr. Manager, Int'l & Gov't Affairs, GE
Rachel Thompson, Administrator, Trade Directorate, OECD

Attendance at the panel was impressive with over 40 academic, government
(officials from the US, Norway, Portugal, Costa Rica, Holland, and Israel)
and private sector participants - in fact, we had to keep adding more chairs.

Terry Thorn began the panel with a history of energy services and the future
of the industry in a liberalized market.  Tim Richards provided a summary of
GE's view of energy services, outlined the current WTO commitments related to
energy services and discussed the issues of defining energy services,
identifying barriers, and setting a negotiating approach.  John Easton
outlined the debate on classification of energy services (goods vs.
services).  Ian Miller followed on the classification issue and applied it to
the EU (especially the German and French) liberalization experience.  Rachel
Thompson outlined her paper on trade in environmental services.  Rachel went
on to describe her lead in the OECD work program on trade in environmental
services with its focus on a win-win approach to trade and environment (this
is similar the win-win-win approach USTR has adopted).  The OECD work program
on environmental services could easily be adopted for energy services.

A lively discussion ensued on the following:  the link between environmental
and energy services, the NAFTA (negative list) negotiating strategies,
challenges of definition and classification, and e-commerce effect on energy
services.

Terry suggested that interested persons attending the panel provide him
contact information so we can create a global network on energy services.  We
can do this independently or through the CSI Global Services Network, which
is an informal, private sector-led on-line community dedicated to
liberalization of services (we can start a sector specific network).

Thanks to all the panelists for your time and talent in making the panel such
a success.

Please see Terry's and Tim's panel presentations attached below:

WSC Plenary

On Tuesday morning all the sector specific panelists chairs presented the
panel recommendation to the WSC Plenary.  Each chair was given 3 minutes to
present its recommendation and 4 Gov't representatives then responded.  The
recommendations will be collected and presented to the trade ministers in
advance of Seattle.

In addition to energy services, recommendations were delivered on e-commerce,
banking, insurance, entertainment, transportation, China, accounting, legal
services, and express delivery.

Terry Thorn delivered the ESC recommendation.  Attached below are Terry's
transcribed comments to the Plenary and the official panel recommendation.

The government responses were as follows:
Stuart Harbinson, Permanent Rep. of Hong Kong to the WTO and Chairman of the
WTO Council on Trade in Services:

Any guidelines on energy services must be general in nature.
Industry must move thoroughly make the case to its respective governments to
raise energy services as a priority.
 Gov't of Hong Kong will focus on Energy Services.

Joseph Papovich, Assistant USTR, Services, Investment & Intellectual
Property:
Energy Services are now in need of further analytical work supported by the
private sector.
Energy Services are similar to telecommunication and could be negotiated
accordingly.
Note of caution:  attempts to liberalize energy services will be derailed if
countries (often developing countries) view this as a mandate for gov'ts to
privatize energy assets.  Instead, it should encourage open and transparent
regulatory processes when privatization occurs.
U.S. supports including energy services in the services round.

Katsuhiro Nakagawa, Special Advisor, Ministry of Int'l Trade and Industry,
Japan:
Japan is currently deregulating its energy sector
 A "primitive" debate needs to occur on defining electricity as good vs.
service
Resource limitations and environmental aspects will be important to Japanese
negotiation.

In summary, I believe we made significant movement on mobilizing global
allies in our efforts.  Numerous colleagues commented on how impressed they
were in our raising energy services to such a level of interest in such a
short time and many acknowledged Joe Hillings' outstanding leadership of the
ESC.  Thanks to all for making the World Services Congress a success.

Please contact me with any questions or concerns.


Mark,

Jennifer (PCG) has supplied me with example language from the confirmations
which is representative of the the other confirmations. I agreed that you and
I would rework a couple of examples for her, and then she can apply the same
principles to the remaining descriptions.

I think the best way to proceed on this is if we work up example wording for
most of the different publication types, and/or verify any wording suggested
by Jennifer against the original confirm language.

I will bring up the originals to you, but my suggestion for a rework is:

Daily price midpoint example (For Gas Daily, Oklahoma-PEPL):

The Index shall be the Daily Midpoint price published on each calendar day
during the term of the transaction under the heading "Daily Price Survey" in
the Oklahoma - PEPL section of Gas Daily, or if a calendar day is not a
business day then the price used shall be the Daily Midpoint price published
on the next succeeding business day.

Monthly price example (For NGI, Northern California Border):

The Index shall be the "Bidweek Average" price for the Northern Cal Border
Average as listed in the table entitled "California Border & Non-Utility
End-User Citygate tables", published in the first issue in each month of
Natural Gas Intelligence Weekly Gas Price Index for the term of the
transaction.

Monthly price example (For Inside Ferc, Texas,Oklahoma PEPL)

The Index shall be the Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co - Texas, Oklahoma
(mainline) price as listed in the section entitled "Prices of Spot Gas
Delivered to Pipelines", published in the first issue in each month of Inside
Ferc's Gas Market Report for the term of the transaction.

In each of the above examples, PCG will need to substitute the price name and
section name for each of the applicable prices in each purblication.

Dave


I sold 5000 out of WT pool for today only 2/15/02 to Astra.  They will be nominating it

Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896   office
713-822-4862   cell
713-646-2551   fax
mark.mcconnell@enron.com


Good Morning Puri:  We have been diligently working on your below request, and
can now offer the following instructions.

Next Loading date for Pt Fortin currently scheduled for AM of 30 March 2001.
As
for heel quantity, we must take into account the  transit  (8 days) from
Boston
to Pt Fortin, and still allow for sufficient heel to keep tanks cold on
arrival,
I suggest in way of 1000 cubic meters, and ask for Masters input in this
regard.

Expected unloading date at Penuelas is 02 April 2001.  Vessel should plan on
departing Pt Fortin Am of 31st March and adjust speed so as to arrive Penuelas
Pilot Station at 0530/0600 02 April.

As always, noon position reports are requested, and the normal points of
contact
at ALNG and Cabot be advised.

Upon departure Boston on 22 March, Master must make notification directly to
ECOELECTRICA, and our Agents in Puerto Rico (Luis-Ayala) providing ETA to both
Pt Fortin to Load, and then further ETA to Penuelas.  Noon reports on ballast
voyage to Pt Fortin, and loaded voyage to Penuelas must also copy ECO, and
Ayala.

I know the Master has all of the relevant POC information for the above, so I
will not include it here.  Should you have any further questions, please so
not
hesitate.

Best Regards
Joe McKechnie

pdelgado@gasnaturalsdg.es on 03/20/2001 12:42:05 PM

To:   Joseph McKechnie/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG
cc:   cramos@gasnaturalsdg.es, mgonzalezga@gasnaturalsdg.es
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: Instructions for "Methane Arctic"

In order to instruct Master regarding next ETA Point Fortin and relevant
heel quantity to be left on
board, pls revert asap with next loading date at Point Fortin.
In addition, we kindly request  you to advise your expected unloading date
at Penuelas.
Thanks and best regards,
Puri

 - att1.eml


Hilary:

Thanks for the sympathy. The City is a hastle. The rules are always changing and the city employees can't even keep up with the changes. It is that much more difficult for you or I? Your experiences unfortunately are fairly typical. I live that way. The time eaten up dealing with all the "back and forth" is a killer too.

Thanks again and Stop by,

Martin Lide
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Hilary Smith
  To: emca@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:05 PM
  Subject: Re: *EMCA* sidewalk: I am the builder

  At 09:37 PM 2/12/2002 -0600, you wrote:

  Thank you for a very detailed, factual account of your dealings with the City of Houston. I had a similar experience with city certified contractors. The city required that we put in a new sewer line: a perfectly legitimate requirement since I knew the little line behind our house frequently backed up when I lived here in the 70's. But, of course, we had to use a city approved contractor and engineer. The engineer drew up plans for a line that was at least twice as long as it needed to be.

  This means that, if I hadn't noticed it, the contractor would have dug up twice as much of Bomar as he did, or, more likely, he would have charged me for the extra work without doing it, probably splitting the excess charge with the engineer and maybe the city inspector. When I pointed it out by phone to the engineer (who almost never returned calls from me or our builder) he said not to worry, that he would be here when the city inspector came and would make everything all right. A friend put me in touch with an e-mail group or small web site maintained by people who had similar problems, and emboldened by their experiences, I finally got him to make the changes by threatening to have his license and his green card revoked.

  I attribute many of our problems with city contractors and employees with a contracting and hiring policy that is more concerned with correcting social evils than getting the work done by someone who can do the best job for the lowest cost.

  (Mr.) Hilary Smith
  712 Bomar St.
  Houston TX 77006-1316
  713.523.0559
  Fax: 713.523.3928
  Website: http://pws.prserv.net/hilary


FYI
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 03:16 PM -----

	Russell Diamond
	12/11/2000 04:46 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: West Exposure

Jeff, Bill,

Per your request, attached is a spreadsheet which details counterparty
exposure in the West region.  The spreadsheet contains several tabs which
detail each the Physical MTM and Financial MTM exposure.  Please be sure you
are looking at the correct spreadsheets.  Also, these exposure amounts do not
reflect the overall exposure with each counterparty, just the exposure for
the West region.

Thanks
Russell


-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan Stewart [SMTP:DSTEWART@tnrcc.state.tx.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 2:27 PM
To: jfields@argentinc.com
Cc: Jim Linville
Subject: Engines and GF Status

Hi Jon,
This is a joint Duncan - Jim Linville reply.
First, for all intents and purposes, expect GF status to go away when the
legislature comes back to town.  With that in mind, what exactly is
happening with this engine.  Does the carburetor replace the mixer valves?
 If so, this must be one ancient engine!  And unlikely to get in under VERP
or any other program designed to end GF status.  Tell us more.
Duncan
>>> Jon Fields <jfields@argentinc.com> 08/22/00 11:05AM >>>
Duncan,
I have some grandfathered gas compressor engines in west Texas.  We are
going to change out the old mixer valves and install carburetors on the
units as a maintenance activity.  Horsepower and emissions will not
increase.  I can maintain my grandfathered status, correct?  We will of
course document this activity and provide copies to the regional office.
Thanks,
Jon Fields
Argent Consulting


Hi Helyette,

Congratulations on your papers.

The purchase contract is in the last stage of approvals
(it's circulating through different parts of the company
where it has to be signed). I think we should be able to execute
the contract  in the first few days of December.

I shall let you know as soon as our internal process is completed.

Vince

GemanIX@aol.com on 11/29/2000 02:26:12 PM
To: VKaminski@aol.com
cc: VKamins@enron.com
Subject: Software

Dear Vince,
I guess time has been flying for you by since our brilliant show
in Paris.In my case,it is the same:I got 3 papers accepted in THE
3 major Journals in Finance(Journal of Business,Journal of Finance
and Journal of Financial Economics).We should write a piece!
Our software seems to be quite satisfactory for the oil people.My
lawyer had added a paragraph to Karla's document:since she had
mentioned the right for Enron to check at any time the code source
etc,he wanted to request Enron to pay his fees in the case D-G
disappeared.In any case,if you are still interested,we are ready to
use your escrow account to make things simpler.Moreover,I am
striking an agreement with a software company ,13years with
people from Polytechnique+finance,to be our hot line(with us paying
royalties,of course).This would complement my 2 associates.
Looking forward to hearing from you
Helyette


We have been asked to justify our  proposal to purchase third party risk
management software rather than use in-house ENA systems.  Since there are
affiliate issues as addressed below, please give us your opinion of the risk
we might run in trying to use ENA's systems.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lee Ferrell/ET&S/Enron on 11/16/2000
03:28 PM ---------------------------

Lisa Sawyer
11/16/2000 01:48 PM
To: Lee Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Risk System Alternatives Next Steps

Lee,
Just to recap the meeting with Richard Burchfield and Steve Stock, based on
the requirements that you and Vernon have identified, we would need to use
several of the system components including TAG, ERMS, GLOBAL COUNTERPARTY,
CREDIT, and UNIFY for settlements.  All of these applications are tightly
integrated.  We considered moving them into the ETS environment which would
separate the applications, but this would be a very large undertaking and
would be a resource intensive effort.  Therefore, due to the size, complexity
and integration of the applications, the group came to the conclusion that it
would be more timely and cost effective from an inception as well as
maintenance standpoint that ETS would have to share these systems with the
marketing group, and that porting them to the ETS environment as separate
application images would not be good from an overall migration as well as
support standpoint.  Additionally, we considered the EnPower System which is
also integrated into GLOBAL COUNTERPARTY, CREDIT and UNIFY.  We are planning
on a demo Friday morning, but there may be some functionality that you all
are looking for related to gas that EnPower cannot provide at this time and
would require some customization.  We'll know more tomorrow after the demo.

Regarding security, these applications are secured to segregate the data, but
we need an approval from Legal that it would be ok to use shared resources
from the IT standpoint.  This would include application developers and
database administrators.  Additionally, we would have to go through the
process of verifying that there would be no security leaks where it would be
possible for a marketer to run a report on pipeline related data, etc...  If
we can get an ok from Legal regardinig sharing of resources, then one of
these options can be explored further, but if we cannot get approval on
sharing of resources, it doesn't look like porting either of these
applications into the ETS environment as standalone apps would be the most
timely or cost effective way to go at this time.  Can you get a stand from
Legal regarding this issue?  Thanks.


Steve:
Enron's general counsel has accepted the concept that we discussed last week
in the Guaranty re setoff, defenses etc.  I will try to send you a revised
Guaranty shortly.
Carol


We are in the process of restructuring the EGM Legal Forms Directory so that
our forms and precedents can be available to everyone who works full or
part-time in the group.  The goal is to centralize all forms and precedents
pertaining to each of the commodities and businesses supported by EGM Legal.
A "precedent" would be a document from a deal you have worked on or otherwise
that you think other members of the group should have access to in order to
get ideas for developing other documents and agreements.  Precedents will not
necessarily be converted to forms, and accordingly, would be used without
form reliability.  A "form" would be a document already approved as a form
within Enron Legal or EGM Legal.  We are going to establish a process for
approval of forms, the details of which will be disseminated at a later
time.  In order to facilitate this process, we have set up a special working
folder as indicated below:

A "Drafts" folder for each of the attorneys in our group has been set up in
"O:\Legal\Global Markets\Forms\DRAFTS". We are still working on providing
access to the directory to the Australia and Japan offices. Nony or Martha
will contact David and Jane, respectively, to provide an alternate way to
send the documents from those offices.

Please select the documents that you would like to add to the Forms Directory
for EGM Legal and have your assistant copy these documents into the
respective folder for clean up.  When copying them into the folder, they
should be "saved as" or renamed with "YOUR INITIALS" (e.g., "DRR" for Dan
Rogers, etc.).  This way we will know whom the forms belong to for questions
during the clean up process.  Once finalized, the initials will be dropped
from the document name; howeverthey would be included in the document
footer.  Nony and Martha are available to assist you with this step in the
process.

Please send an e-mail to Martha and Nony with the name and number of files
you have placed into the folder.

So that we can have a good database from which to develop our forms directory
for the benefit of all of us, please complete the above process by Tuesday,
May 15.

Please feel free to contact Martha Braddy, Nony Flores, or me with any
comments/questions you may have. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in
this important effort.

Regards, Alan


Attached is a new draft of the press release, which is scheduled to be
released before the opening of the market tomorrow morning.  Please let me
know tonight if you have any additional changes.

Thank you.
Karen


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 08:32 AM -----

	Clement Abrams@ENRON
	12/11/2000 06:23 PM

		 To: susan.hopkinson@lovells.com
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron Corp. guarantee

Susan,

As it relates to Rider A, Enron Corp. can agree to the proposed language.
Please feel free to give me a call at (713) 853-5986.

Regards,

Clement


Here is some information that will be of use to you.  Please give me a call
Wednesday or Thursday to talk about meeting on Friday.  See ya.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
09:36 AM ---------------------------

Brandon Neff@EES
11/06/2000 10:43 PM
To: Brandon Neff/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, tragar@texas.net, Chris_Porter@Dell.com,
Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT@ect, DMartin <dmartin@imperialcapital.com> @ ENRON
Subject: Re: Vegas

72 hours until G-Day.  I will be in Vegas at 7:30 on Thursday - let me know
when you are going to arrive so we can be at the tables at our hotel.   I am
going to get a tee time for Friday around 12 or 1.   I'll call tomorrow while
I am glued to CNN watching the election.  Martin, make sure you vote for GW,
your the only one whose vote is going to matter here.   The rooms are going
to be around $100 per person.

The only planned activity is golf on Friday afternoon, the rest will be up to
our collective wisdom.

Hotel:  Flamingo
BN Cell:  713-502-1920
BN Work:  713-853-3462 or 1800-97-ENRON, press 0 for the voice directory.

BN


The contacts we previously had listed for TXU - Master User have changed. All three companies TXU Electric Company, TXU Energy Trading Canada Limited and TXU Energy Trading Company will all be handled by Michael Adams, Risk Control for TXU Energy Trading Company. On first pass they indicated they would be signing up and look forward to trading online. He would prefer to see the information emailed to him including the ETA. Here is all of his information:

Michael Adams
Risk Control Manager
TXU Energy Trading Company
214-875-9355
Email: madams3@txu.com

If you have any questions or need further assistance please contact me at X36784.


Well, I just don't know what to tell you.  If nothing else I think the ball
was punted to the east.

Kay

From: Ed B Hearn III@ECT on 02/27/2001 10:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: CA - Onondaga

Kay:

Not a problem on the CAs at all.  I just noticed something in Sheila's
email.  Sheila indicated she was NOT working the One-eyed Dog CFI assignment,
but I

really think she is working on it, because she just had me set up the entity
to receive the CFI by assignment  (Onondaga Energy Venture, L.L.C.).

Am I confused?  Just a little dazed, maybe?

E

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	02/27/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: CA - Onondaga

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/27/2001 10:42
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
02/26/2001 06:16 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: CA - Onondaga

I'll get Kathleen to do it, as she has my current favorite form.  Thanks
anyway.

Kay

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 02/26/2001 06:03 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: CA - Onondaga

The sale of the cash flow interest is a new deal that I am not working on and
I think that the CA that Fred needs is to cover bidders for the purchase of
the cash flow interest.  I will get Ed to prepare the CA if you wish.


It's great that your coming to Calgary to study for a couple of months.
You'll have to work extra hard in June so you can kick back during Stampede.
Things here are pretty much unchanged. Working quite a bit and doing a little
snowboarding and beer drinking on the weekends. Things could definately be
worse. Going golfing in Playa del Carmen in a couple of weeks. That should be
fun. Looking forward to chilling out by the pool for a week and doing
nothing. This year has been a roller coaster ride for my trading profits and
I need a break. Met a really cool girl recently. Will advise if anything
interesting devolops there. It's a beautiful Sunday afternoon and I have no
idea why I am at work. I think I'm going to go to the driving range. Take it
easy and w/b!

CD


Your a most welcome.   I would like to see the doc they sign to see if they
accepted our remarks.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 01:45
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Nedre Strambler                           04/24/2000 10:59 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Applicant from CareerPath.com :(0000103079)

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Nedre Strambler/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2000
11:58 AM ---------------------------

Paralegalpro20@hotmail.com on 04/23/2000 11:43:37 PM
To: nedre.strambler@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Applicant from CareerPath.com :(0000103079)

*** This candidate response was brought to you by CareerPath.com
Jobcode: 0000103079
Jobtitle: SR LEGAL SPECIALIST
Regarding: Sr. Legal Specialist
Vivian I. Igweh
HM: (281)- 8795576 Fax:(713)595 2104 xtn 1163
Pager Number: (713) 930-2854
http://vigweh.tripod.com/index.html

EDUCATION
Oxford Brookes University - Oxford, England.   1990
Diploma in General Studies
University of London, London - England.   1993
Bachelor of Laws LL.B (JD)
Passed the Professional Responsibility Ethical Exam for Attorneys.   1997
D.S.U. Training Institute - Houston-Texas.  1997 - 1998
Computer literacy certification

LEGAL EXPERIENCE 1999-2000
MISCELLANEOUS CONTRACT POSITIONS
ALTURA ENERGY, HOUSTON - TEXAS PARALEGAL
Responsibilities included assisting the ceo in all legal matters concerning
an acquisition and merger, word-processing,
drafted and corrected agreements, received and made calls to clients, faxed
photocopied and e-mailed documents.
SHELL OIL COMPANIES, HOUSTON - TEXAS PARALEGAL
responsibilities included handling heavey litigation documents and case
procedures, assisting in acquisition and merger
transactions, document production and review, contract analysis, assisted
attorneys, performed quality control of
documents, handled privileged and sensitive documents
ELPASO OIL COMPANY, HOUSTON - TEXAS PARALEGAL
Responsibilities included handling heavey litigation documents and case
procedures, assisting in acquisitions and merger
transactions, document production and review, contract analysis, assisted
attorneys, performing quality control of
documents, handled privileged and sensitive documents.
UNION OIL OF CALIFORNIA, HOUSTON - TEXAS PARALEGAL
Responsibilities included coding of legal documents, document production and
review, quality control of documents,
proof reading, assisting the attorneys in contract analysis.
FULBRIGHT AND JAWORSKI, HOUSTON - TEXAS PARALEGAL
Responsibilities included review and analysis of corporate litigation
documents, document production and redaction.
BAKER AND BOTTS, HOUSTON - TEXAS PARALEGAL
responsibilities included reviewing and analysing corporate litigation
documents, preparation for trial.

LAW OFFICE OF GABE AND ASSOC., HOUSTON - TEXAS. 1995-1999
PARALEGAL
Responsibilities included trial preparation, interviewed and set up new
client files, researched and analysed cases,
attended and summarised depositions, attended court proceedings and
mediations, assisted in discovery, drafted and
filed petitions, propounded and responded to interrogatories, carried out
investigations and negotiations.
LAW FIRM OF NWOKOLO AND NZEAKO, LAGOS - NIGERIA.      1993 - 1994
PARALEGAL
Responsibilities included analysis of oil and gas contracts, handled heavy
litigation documents and case procedures,
corporate negotiations, handled sensitive and privileged documents,
researched for trial, prepared trial packets,
interviewed and set up files, assisted in court proceedings, drafted
pleadings, general office support.

SKILLS
Typing, Windows 3.1., 95, and 98, Internet, Microsoft Word for Windows 7.0.
and 97, Word Perfect for Windows 7.0,
Microsoft Access 7.0, Lotus Notes, Quicken, Microsoft Mail and Exchange,
Microsoft Excel 7.0, Microsoft PowerPoint
7.0, Summation for Windows, Westlaw, Lexis-Nexis.
Excellent oil and gas litigation skills, communication, interactive, case
management, office, organizational and leadership
skills, group (team) work, work under pressure and by deadline, detail
oriented, able to work over-time, fast-paced, task
management, use of initiative, ethical and  professional.

REFERENCES: Will be provided upon request.