You can ask fabiola.  We are not in a bind we are still waiting on a few
people to get back with us.  I think ashley was calling Monica and Jaime to
see if they were interested and Ricky and Tanya.  The only bad thing is they
have to let us know tomorrow if they are interested.  Sorry you are unable to
make it, maybe next year.
PL

rachel.bonilla-kragel@accenture.com on 02/14/2001 11:17:00 AM
To: Phillip.M.Love@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Jazz Fest

Hey...it looks like we aren't going to be able to make it.  Jason told me
to go with girlfriends.....and I really thought about it.  I remembered
that I had a wedding in April (girl at my wedding from Tampa) and found out
yesterday that it is April 21.  So..if I am traveling every week and am in
Tampa the 21 (Jason is not going)..and then Jazz Fest the following
week...it will be three weeks that I don't see him.  I just don't think
that is a wise move on my part.  Although I really want to go!!

Does this put you in a weird bind re: not enough people in the rooms, etc.?
If it does, please let me know.  I know Fabiola was leaning on going...so
maybe I could follow-up with her.

Rachel Bonilla-Kragel
Accenture
North American C&HT
Denver - Octel 359/6017 - Direct Dial (720) 359-6017
rachel.bonilla-kragel@accenture.com

            Phillip.M.Love@enron.c
            om                            To:     Rachel
Bonilla-Kragel@Accenture
                                          cc:
            02/14/2001 07:48 AM           Subject:     Jazz Fest

Hey girl, you guys figure out about Jazz Fest yet?  We have to pay for the
rooms tomorrow.  I need to know ASAP.  Hope everything is going good.
PL

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


Please speak with Tana.  She will provide you with the full explanation
(online/offline).  SS

	Sheetal Patel
	07/25/2000 11:57 AM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: PG&E Core

PG&E Core states that they are a subsidiary of Pacific Gas & Electric Company
who has a master w/ ENA.  Therefore, can we set up PG&E Core w/ a master?

Thank you,

Sheetal :)


Hey sugar, how are you doing?  How is your day?  I hope good.  Mine is good so far.  Can't wait to see you.

Love

The pigs


Folks:
My apologies.  This is not proofed, but I wanted to make sure that everyone
had a chance to review and comment.  Apologies for any unintentional
omissions and errors.  I think it tracks closely with the direction agreed to
on the call today.  All comments are encouraged and welcome.

Best,
Jeff


Sounds like a good match with Ruthie and Murphy.

My old dog, Kaley, is really sounding bad.  She has a cough that just won't
quit, which has gotten worse over the last couple of years.  I think it is
her heart.  She's 11 years old, and moves slowly.

Rosco owns the familiy now.  He is so quiet, but friendly.  Just likes to
hang around close to everyone.  I'll miss him when I'm in FW.

ckm

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 03/16/2001 12:24 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Delta Call

Are you having fun yet!!!!!!

The vet said Murphy has an ear infection so that's probably why he's been
scratching.  Otherwise, he's in great shape.  31.5 pounds and he also thinks
Murphy is less than one year old.  He said Murphy is a wire terrier cross.  I
looked that up, and it's an ugly dog!  He definitely doesn't have that face,
it looks more like a Jack Russell.  You should have seen him running behind
Ruthie this morning.  All four legs were off the ground - he definitely has
kangaroo in him!  He must have had a rough day though because Ruthie was
wanting to mess with him, and he snapped at her.  He's like Ric, you can only
push him so far!  I'll try and take some pictures this weekend.  Just thought
I'd update you on the kids!

Do you need something for lunch?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	03/16/2001 11:56 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Delta Call

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 11:56
AM ---------------------------

Stephen Thome@ECT
03/16/2001 11:54 AM
To: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
ccampbell@kslaw.com, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Delta Call

We are scheduled to have a call with Delta at 2:30 Houston time.  They will
have their in-house counsel present to go over the letter agreement.  Delta
will call Carlos's number.

Steve


---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001
02:42 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pat Boylston" <pgboylston@stoel.com>
02/15/2001 03:21 PM

To: Christian.Yoder@enron.com
cc:
Subject: With indemnification

 - AmendABX1.wpd


This is the most current information I have on specifications.

I sent Ben and Mike an email about the 12th slot, but haven't heard from
either one of them.

By the way, I was asking about whether the changes I had suggested for the
transformer contract had been included in the Calumet equipment purchase
terms, as I was confident the changes are in this agreement.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/16/2000 08:00
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           06/01/2000 05:54 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Option Amendment

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/01/2000 05:54
PM ---------------------------

frank.chmiel@us.abb.com on 06/01/2000 05:48:58 PM
To: Kay.mann@enron.com
cc: michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com, karla.hesketh@us.abb.com

Subject: Option Amendment

Kay,
     See attached rev 4 of the document you sent me with the revisions that we
discussed.  I have signed the letter and initialled the 6 pages and will fax
them to you at 713-646-3491.  If after your review there are any additional
questions at Enron feel free to call me.      (See attached file:
amendABBoption6000may12rev4.doc)
     Regards,
     Frank

 - amendABBoption6000may12rev4.doc


Louise,

Here is a preliminary copy of the presentation.  We are scrubbing the numbers as we discussed.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks!

Faith


If you haven't seen this white paper as yet, may be worth your time.  It discusses EnronOnline's place in the market now and in the future (will still be here, but much less market share).  Among other things, says companies will develop APIs to take their transaction data back to their own systems (pg. 10).  Doesn't discuss the industry clearinghouse concept for processing these transactions.

http://www.forrester.com/Research/ThankYou/PDF/0,2254,14162,00.pdf

Thanks,

Fred


I'll give them to Bugg. I will help move.

Chris


109TQQ

Print Request:   Selected Document(s): 6,22,39,40,66

Time of Request: December 11, 2000  07:25 pm EST
Number of Lines: 475
Job Number:      59:0:18429396
Client ID/Project Name: 70

Research Information:

General News;American Telephone & Telegraph, NCR, (pooling of interests)

Note:
Hi Jeff, here are the docs I thought were good, keep in mind that I referenced
these in my paper.  Cheers

6 of 67 DOCUMENTS

The Associated Press

The materials in the AP file were compiled by The Associated Press. These
materials may not be republished without the express written consent of The
Associated Press.

August 29, 1991, Thursday, BC cycle

SECTION: Business News

LENGTH: 322 words

HEADLINE: NCR to Sell Stock Privately to Consummate Merger With AT&T

DATELINE: NEW YORK

BODY:

NCR Corp. and American Telephone & Telegraph Co. said Thursday they have
agreed to sell 6.3 million shares of NCR privately as part of the phone
company's purchase of the computer maker.

The companies announced earlier this month they would sell the stock to the
public in a step to obtain regulatory approval of their merger as a "pooling
of
interests."

Such approval provides favorable tax treatment for AT&T. But the company
could not obtain such a ruling from regulators because NCR had repurchased
some
of its stock from the public in the two years preceeding the May 6 merger
announcement, which is not allowed under regulations.

To undo those stock purchases, NCR announced Aug. 9 it would sell the 6.3
million shares back to the public.

But the companies said Thursday they had decided to sell the stock privately
instead, at $ 102.75 a share, to clients of four affiliates of The Capital
Group
Inc., a Los Angeles-based investment management company.

AT&T said the private placement would limit the chances of unfavorable market
conditions at the time of a public offering.

NCR stock closed Thursday at $ 108.12 a share on the New York Stock Exchange,
up 37 cents.

The NCR shares will be converted into AT&T shares when the merger is
completed. The deal will make the Capital Group clients the largest AT&T
shareholder collectively, at about 1.5 percent, the phone company said. AT&T
is
the most widely held stock, so no single shareholder owns a large percentage
of
its stock.

The stock sale will be completed after NCR shareholders approve the merger at
a meeting Sept. 13, the two companies said.

The four Capital Group companies involved in the stock purchase are Capital
Research and Management Co., manager of the American Funds Group of mutual
funds; Capital Guardian Trust Co., a manager of institutional accounts;
Capital
International Ltd., based in London; and Capital International S.A. of Geneva.

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

22 of 67 DOCUMENTS

Copyright 1991 The New York Times Company

The New York Times

July 4, 1991, Thursday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section D; Page 2; Column 5; Financial Desk

LENGTH: 529 words

HEADLINE: A.T.& T. Alters Merger To Win Audit Ruling

BYLINE: By ALISON LEIGH COWAN

BODY:

The American Telephone and Telegraph Company said yesterday that it had
modified the terms of its merger deal with the NCR Corporation to settle
questions about the accounting method to be used in the transaction.

The telecommunications giant is seeking approval from the Securities and
Exchange Commission to use the pooling-of-interest accounting method for the
merger transaction, but some aspects of the deal may not qualify for the
favorable treatment.

The stakes are high for NCR shareholders. If the pooling method is allowed,
A.T.& T. will use an all-stock transaction to buy NCR, which will be tax-free
to
NCR shareholders. If the method is not allowed, A.T.& T. will pay 60 percent
stock and 40 percent cash, with the cash portion subject to taxation.

Special Dividend

Under the pooling method, companies are generally not allowed to pay a
special dividend or otherwise alter their equity capital before a merger. But
in
March, trying to fend off the A.T.& T. takeover by making it less attractive
to
NCR shareholders, NCR paid a $1 special dividend.

To counter that dividend and remove some of questons about using the
pooling-of-interest treatment, A.T.& T. said yesterday that NCR would withhold
its next two quarterly dividends of 37 cents each. A.T.& T. also said that it
would raise the price it is paying for NCR shares by 74 cents each, or $50
million, to $7.4 billion, or $110.74 a share. The higher price, A.T.& T. said,
reflects the increased value it will be receiving in NCR because of the two
forgone dividends.

"The omission of the quarterly dividend would, in effect, neutralize the
effects of the special dividend, and that would prevent the possibility that
the
special dividend could create a problem for pooling," said Jane Biba, an A.T.&
T. spokeswoman.

$1.37 a Share in 1991

She said that under the plan, NCR shareholders would collect a total of
$1.37 in dividends a share in 1991 versus the $1.11 or $1.48 they might have
received had there been no special dividend and had three or four quarterly
dividends been paid before a merger.

She said that A.T.& T. had been told by its auditors, NCR's auditors and the
accounting firm that audits its investment bank that these revisions should
allow the deal to qualify for pooling treatment.

"You have three highly reputable accounting firms who have said this is in
accordance with the literature and that we are entitled to pooling," she said.

Not Yet Convinced

But John C. Burton, an accounting professor at Columbia University and a
former chief accountant for the S.E.C., said he was still unconvinced that the
regulators should approve the pooling proposed.

"If they're going to pay out 74 cents a share more and NCR is not going to
pay out a dividend, that's just a wash," Professor Burton said. "I don't see
how
that makes a difference. I would hope the auditors of the commission would
make
it clear they can't undertake such an exercise successfully."

The S.E.C. said yesterday that it had no comment.

A.T.&T.'s shares closed unchanged on the New York Stock Exchange yesterday at
$39.25, while NCR shares gained 25 cents to close at $108.

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

LOAD-DATE: July 4, 1991

39 of 67 DOCUMENTS

Copyright 1991 The New York Times Company

The New York Times

May 7, 1991, Tuesday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section A; Page 1; Column 5; Financial Desk

LENGTH: 1474 words

HEADLINE: A.T.&T. Buying Computer Maker In Stock Deal Worth $7.4 Billion

BYLINE: By EBEN SHAPIRO

BODY:

After more than five months of stubborn resistance, NCR agreed yesterday to
be acquired by A.T.& T. for $7.4 billion worth of A.T.& T. stock.

The acquisition signals the American Telephone and Telegraph Company's
determination to expand beyond telecommunications to compete in computers with
giants like NEC and Fujitsu of Japan, Siemens of Germany and I.B.M.

In starting its quest to buy the NCR Corporation, A.T.& T. was seeking a
permanent solution to the problem of its money-losing computer business and
hoping to find a way to expand into new markets, ones that increasingly rely
on
linking computers and communications. Analysts say A.T.& T.'s computer
business
has lost more than $2 billion in six years.

NCR, based in Dayton, Ohio, grew from the National Cash Register Company (it
still makes some cash registers) to become the fifth-largest computer maker in
the country.

When A.T.& T. began its pursuit of NCR in December, many industry observers
were surprised that kindly Ma Bell had put on the grim visage of a corporate
raider. The hostile bid was another milestone in the transformation of the
heavily regulated bureaucratic monopoly that existed before the 1984
court-ordered breakup of the Bell System.

In recent years, as a more aggressive corporation, A.T.& T. has cut costs and
more closely tied executive pay to profit levels.

Robert E. Allen, the chairman of A.T.& T., said yesterday that with NCR the
company would work toward providing "global computer networks as easy to use
and
accessible as the telephone network is today."

Jack B. Grubman, an analyst with Paine Webber Inc., said: "A.T.& T. would
like to be a $100 billion company by the end of the decade. They would love to
be able to go to the chief executive officer of Nestle and say, 'We will
provide
you soup to nuts, your entire information network.' "

Given that assumption, Mr. Grubman and others say more large deals are likely
to follow. "Over the next decade they will do several more deals of this size
or
bigger," Mr. Grubman said.

Under the definitive merger agreement, A.T.& T. will exchange $110 worth of
its own stock for each NCR share, but on the New York Stock Exchange
yesterday,
NCR's shares closed at just $104, up 50 cents. The difference reflects the
fact
that investors are expected to have to wait four months for the deal to close.
But that price is still more than double the $48 that NCR was trading for a
month before A.T T. made its first offer in December. A.T.& T.'s shares
slipped
37.5 cents yesterday, to $36.75.

A.T.& T. dwarfs NCR in size, with 1990 revenues of $37.3 billion, compared
with $6.2 billion for NCR. Still, the computer maker will provide A.T.& T.
important entries into financial and retail industries. NCR is in the process
of
introducing a line of "open system" computers that are capable of being linked
with computers and software made by different manufacturers.

The merger agreement signed yesterday is subject to the approval of NCR
shareholders.

The First Bid

It all started in December, when A.T.& T. offered $90 a share, or $6.1
billion, for NCR. By keeping A.T.& T. at bay during the winter, Charles E.
Exley
Jr., NCR's chairman, was able to cajole A.T.& T. into paying an additional
$1.3
billion.

"He has done a lot for shareholders," said Don Geogerian, head of research of
Dreyfus Management Inc., an institutional stockholder of NCR.

Martin D. Sass of M. D. Sass Investors Services said, "Mr. Exley played his
cards pretty strongly to get A.T.& T. up to $110."

In the end, the booming stock market made a hero out of Mr. Exley.

A.T.& T.'s stock was trading around $30 in December. At the time, A.T.& T.
said it was willing to pay for NCR with stock or cash. A stock offer at that
time would have involved three A.T.& T. shares for each NCR share.

But in April, with the shares of A.T.& T. above $37, A.T.& T. could agree to
meet NCR's asking price of $110, at minimal additional cost.

A.T.& T. plans to issue new stock to acquire NCR. Analysts estimated that the
new stock would dilute A.T.& T.'s per-share earnings by 10 to 15 cents a year.

Staying in Dayton

A.T.& T. said NCR would retain its headquarters in Dayton, and its corporate
name. Mr. Allen, the A.T.& T. chairman, said NCR would continue to support
civic
and philanthropic organizations in Dayton.

The companies have been on the verge of an agreement for three weeks. Part of
the final haggling was over how much protection NCR shareholders would have if
A.T.& T.'s stock price fell while the acquisition was being completed.

In a compromise, A.T.& T. agreed to insure that NCR shareholders would
receive $110 worth of stock as long as A.T.& T. shares traded between $34.125
and $40.625.

The exact number of A.T.& T. shares to be exchanged for each NCR share will
be determined by A.T.& T.'s average closing price during the 20 trading days
before NCR shareholders meet to vote on the merger. A date for the meeting has
not been set, but it is expected to take place in four to five months.

The maximum number of A.T.& T. shares exchanged for each NCR share would be
3.223, if A.T.& T. stock fell to $34.125 or below. The minimum number would be
2.708, if A.T.& T. stock was $40.625 or above.

Analysts said it was unlikely that A.T.& T. stock would fall below $34.125
without a significant overall market drop. Several analysts have predicted
that
A.T.& T.'s stock would rise to about $50 in the next 12 months.

As an all-stock deal, the merger would be tax-free to NCR stockholders.

Some Special Accouting

The all-stock deal also makes it possible for A.T.& T. to use an accounting
treatment known as a pooling of interests, which would be favorable to its
reported earnings.

A.T.& T. and NCR plan to talk to the Securities and Exchange Commission to
determine if the pooling method can be used. If not, A.T.& T. plans to offer
40
percent cash and 60 percent stock.

Mr. Exley led the resistance to A.T.& T.'s offer, initially saying NCR was
worth at least $125 a share. Before NCR's March 28 annual meeting, he said he
would accept $110.

Mr. Exley, who has more than 30 years of experience in the computer business,
played an unusually active role in fending off A.T.& T., as he and his
management team kept the company's Wall Street advisers on a tight leash.

"Let's just say that they are very actively involved in deciding their own
approach to things," said a person working with NCR.

During the takeover fight, NCR contended that A.T.& T. was taking advantage
of a temporary drop in NCR's stock price. But beyond stalling for time, Mr.
Exley had few options after A.T.& T. made its initial bid.

And as time went on, his options were reduced.

Ruling by a Judge

In March, a Federal judge in Dayton threw out NCR's main line of defense, an
employee stock ownership plan, saying that it had been adopted simply to
protect
the incumbent management and that it made a mockery of shareholder rights. At
NCR's annual meeting in March, NCR shareholders voted Mr. Exley off the board,
as A.T.& T. won four seats.

The deal will add considerably to the wealth of Mr. Exley and other NCR
executives. Through stock options and direct holdings, Mr. Exley owns more
than
306,359 shares of NCR, worth nearly $34 million under terms of the deal.
Gilbert
P. Williamson, NCR's new chief executive, has stock options and holdings worth
about $11 million at the purchase price.

Mr. Exley plans to retire after the merger is complete.

A.T.& T.'s unsuccessful ventures in computers began in 1983, with the
company's investment in Ing. C. Olivetti & Company of Italy. Olivetti made a
line of personal computers for A.T.& T. that proved to be unpopular, and A.T.&
T. swapped its stake in the Italian company in 1989.

Now the fate of A.T.& T.'s own computer business is uncertain. By publicly
stating that it will turn its computer operation over to NCR's management,
A.T.&
T. has hurt morale among the 9,000 employees in its computer division.

In preparation for the acquisition, the company has trimmed 1,000 jobs in the
division since fall.

Mr. Allen would not speculate on the fate of A.T.& T.'s computer employees
yesterday.

Several months ago, A.T.& T. said it would pay bonuses to workers who
remained at their jobs for six months to discourage worried workers from
looking
for jobs outside the company.

Mr. Grubman, the analyst, said many of A.T.& T.'s computer employees would be
dismissed. "I don't think that NCR needs more people," he said. He added that
the deal made immediate financial sense for A.T.& T. because it would allow
the
company to replace its unprofitable computer operation with a profitable one.

A.T.& T. said yesterday that the acquisition would result in "one-time
material charges to A.T.& T.'s earnings."

GRAPHIC: Chronology: "Twists and Turns on the Way to a Deal"

Dec. 2, 1990: A.T.& T. offered to buy NCR for $6 billion, in a renewed effort
to
become a power in computers. The offer amounted to $90 a share, 60 percent
above
NCR's last closing price.

Dec. 3: NCR stock jumped 43.6 percent , to $81.50.

Dec. 5: A.T.& T. announced a $90-a-share hostile cash tender offer for NCR
after
the computer maker's board rejected A.T.& T.'s stock bid.

Dec. 6: A.T.& T. said Chemical Bank would lead a syndicate to raise the money
to
finance the deal.

Dec. 10: More than 50 banks agreed to provide financing to A.T.& T.

Dec. 14: Announcing that its directors had unanimously rejected the tender
offer, NCR called the bid "grossly inadequate and unfair."

Dec. 16: A.T.& T. said it would mount a proxy fight to unseat the NCR board.

Jan. 16: A.T.& T. reported that it had received tenders for about 70 percent
of
NCR's common stock.

Feb. 21: NCR created an employee stock ownership plan to help it fend off the
takeover. The plan would put 8 percent of the company's stock in friendly
hands.
NCR amended its bylaws so it could increase the size of its board.

March 10: A.T.& T. said it was willing to raise its offer to $100 a share if
NCR
would frop its objections to the deal.

March 19: Federal Judge Herbert Rice ruled against the employee stock
ownership
plan proposed by NCR. A.T.& T. said it would raise its offer if NCR
shareholders
voted to remove the board.

March 25: In an effort to negotiate a friendly end to the takeover bid, the
companies' chairmen, Charles E. Exley Jr. of NCR and Robert E. Allen of A.T.&
T., met for five hours. No agreements were announced.

March 26: Talks broke down and the prospects of a quick resolution diminished
as
the two sides offered vastly different portrayals of the previous day's
meeting.
A.T.& T. said it would press "vigorously ahead" with its proxy contest. NCR's
chairman said he was willing to continue discussions.

March 27: NCR told A.T.& T. it would agree to be bought for $110 a share,
according to the phone company's statement. A.T.& T. rejected the offer.

March 28: A.T.& T. captured four seats on NCR's board, including those held by
Gilbert Williamson, NCR's president, and Mr. Exley, but fell short of its goal
of replacing the entire board. Executives at both companies said that
negotiations would continue and that a meeting of minds was possible.

April 5: Negotiations appreared to be at an impasse after a week of meetings.

April 21: A.T.& T. said it was willing to raise its bid to $110 a share,
provided it could qualify for favorable accounting treatment and pay for the
deal with its own stock.

April 23: NCR said it was prepared to accept the new offer if its shareholders
were protected from a drop in A.T.& T.'s share price.

April 28: NCR expanded its board by two members, reseating Mr. Exley and Mr.
Williamson.

May 6: After more than five months of talks, NCR accepted an all-stock bid at
$110 a share. (pg. D6)

Graphs: "The Combination" shows the breakdown of 1990 revenues of A.T.&T. and
NCR, in billions of dollars. (Source: Company reports) (pg. D6)

Daily close of NCR shares on N.Y.S.E., Dec. 1990-April 1991 (Pg. D6)

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

LOAD-DATE: May 7, 1991

40 of 67 DOCUMENTS

Copyright 1991 Bergen Record Corp.

The Record

May 7, 1991; TUESDAY; ALL EDITIONS

SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg. C01

LENGTH: 746 words

HEADLINE: IT'S A CONNECTION;

AT&T FINALLY LANDS COMPUTER MAKER NCR
A POOLING OF INTERESTS?

BYLINE: Dan Woods, Record Staff Writer

BODY:

Accountants and regulators, rather than engineers and salesmen,
will probably determine whether AT&T's purchase of NCR will be an
immediate success.

The American Telephone & Telegraph Co. wants to classify its
purchase of NCR Corp. as a friendly stock swap, eligible for treatment
as a "pooling-of-interest" merger, as if the two had been operating
together all along.

Under this method, NCR shareholders won't have to pay taxes on
their profits. And AT&T will avoid huge "goodwill" write-offs, which
would hurt its earnings for at least 10 years.

"Pooling is very important to the success of the merger," said
Joanne C. Smith, an analyst at Nomura Research Institute in New York.

"NCR doesn't cost AT&T very much if they use pooling. And if AT&T
doesn't use pooling, it's going to cut them back to levels of earnings
that they made in 1989."

The federal Securities and Exchange Commission will settle the
issue, balancing pressure from the companies with its skeptical view of
pooling and Treasury Department concerns about millions in lost tax
revenue.

The SEC generally prefers "purchase accounting," in which the buyer
pays cash or securities for the acquired company's assets. Analysts say
the SEC likes this method because clear valuation of assets gives
investors a good idea of what a company is worth.

If purchase accounting were used, AT&T would pay NCR shareholders
$ 7.4 billion, 40 percent in cash and 60 percent in stock, subject to
an agreement guaranteeing NCR shareholders a minimum price.

Accountants would then sift through NCR's $ 1.8 billion of assets on
NCR's books and determine the fair market value of the assets, which is
probably higher than $ 1.8 billion.

The difference between the purchase price and the market value is
put on AT&T's books as "goodwill", an intangible asset that takes into
account the value added to a business as a result of reputation,
patronage, and the like.

Smith estimates that a maximum $ 5.6 billion in goodwill will have
to be written off against earnings if purchase accounting is used,
dropping earnings by about 55 cents per share. Under pooling, she said,
AT&T will probably see earnings drop only 10 cents a share.

If the merger were accounted for as a pooling of interests, AT&T
would simply add the $ 1.8 billion in assets on NCR's books onto its own
books. NCR shareholders would get $ 7.4 billion worth of AT&T stock, and
NCR shareholders would not have to pay taxes on the rise in their shares
until the shares were sold.

But in its attempt to wriggle free from AT&T's embrace, NCR,
through antitakeover measures, may have unwittingly prevented the use of
pooling of interests. Because of these moves, the SEC may disqualify the
deal from using pooling-of-interest accounting.

But analyst John S. Bain, who works for the Raymond James
securities firm in Florida, said the SEC will probably allow the pooling
to go through, albeit reluctantly. He said the SEC dislikes the
antitakeover measures NCR used to fend off AT&T much more than pooling.

Chart, page C01

THE LONG ROAD TO A DEAL

Dec. 2: AT&T offers to buy NCR for $ 90-a-share in stock, after NCR
rejected an earlier bid made privately.

Dec. 5: NCR opposes a takeover but says it would talk if AT&T offered
$ 125 a share, or $ 8.5 billion. AT&T announces a $ 90-a-share cash tender
offer to NCR stockholders
Dec. 16: Two days after NCR rejects the bid, AT&T asks NCR shareholders
to hold a special meeting to vote on removing NCR's board.

March 19: A judge kills NCR's plan to give employees more votes at the
meeting. AT&T promises $ 100 a share in cash if NCR's board is ousted.

March 24: NCR's board authorizes a merger at above $ 100 a share. Talks
fail to reach a deal.

March 28: AT&T wins four board seats at a special NCR shareholders
meeting, but fails in an effort to oust the entire board, which would
have easily paved the way for a takeover. AT&T gets some negotiating
leverage.

April 19: AT&T boosts its takeover offer to $ 110 a share, NCR's minimum
asking price, and changes the terms from a cash purchase to a stock
swap.

April 22: NCR suggests it could accept if shareholders are assured
they'll get the stock equivalent of $ 110 a share, even if AT&T's stock
value falls.

May 1: AT&T representatives take their four seats on NCR's board.

May 6: AT&T and NCR agree to merge.

GRAPHIC: telephone giant into the top ranks of the computer industry.
(2)Gilbert P. Williamson, CEO of the computer unit
CHART - THE LONG ROAD TO A DEAL

LANGUAGE: English

LOAD-DATE: October 2, 1995

66 of 67 DOCUMENTS

Copyright 1991 The Washington Post

The Washington Post

March 19, 1991, Tuesday, Final Edition

SECTION: FINANCIAL; PAGE D3; ALLAN SLOAN

LENGTH: 805 words

HEADLINE: NCR's Little-Noticed Ploy to Avoid the Clutches of AT&T

SERIES: Occasional

BYLINE: ALLAN SLOAN

BODY:

Watching NCR Corp. trying to escape from AT&T's hostile tender offer is like
watching a guerrilla force setting booby traps to blow up in the enemy's face.
It can't win on a conventional battlefield, so it uses tricks.

NCR's latest corporate punji stick is a little-noticed dividend that seems
likely to reduce AT&T's reported profits by $ 5 billion should American
Telephone & Telegraph Co. succeed in taking over NCR.

The NCR maneuver is marvelously innovative. It's also incredibly sleazy,
given the fact that holders of two-thirds of NCR's stock have tendered their
shares to AT&T, which is offering $ 90 a share and says it will go higher if
NCR
agrees to be bought. AT&T hasn't bought the tendered shares because of NCR's
defenses.

The booby trap is a special $ 1 a share dividend that NCR announced on Feb.
21, and that is scheduled to be paid tomorrow. NCR says the dividend is
designed
to put money in the hands of its shareholders. AT&T's minions say
confidentially
that the dividend's real purpose is to poison AT&T's earnings statement if it
buys NCR. The leakers' goal: to get enough NCR stockholders angry enough to
pressure NCR's board to cancel the dividend.

Why haven't you heard about this dividend before? Because NCR announced it
the same day that it unveiled a more obvious booby trap, an abusive employee
stock ownership plan that AT&T is challenging in court. People homed in
instead
on the ESOP, which gives NCR employees 8 percent of NCR's voting power, making
it virtually impossible for AT&T to get the 80 percent majority vote it needs
to
oust NCR's board at a special meeting set for March 28.

Should the dividend be paid, it will almost surely stop AT&T from using a
special accounting method called "pooling of interests" if it buys NCR. If
AT&T
can't use pooling, its earnings will take a tremendous bath. But pooling is
hard
to come by. You must meet 12 criteria, which take 22 pages to outline. Miss
one
criterion, and you're all wet.

"If the dividend is paid, it would be very unlikely that AT&T could get
pooling treatment," says Robert Willens, Lehman Brothers Inc.'s resident tax
and
accounting expert. Willens's firm isn't involved in this deal.

The ultimate arbiter of pooling, the Securities and Exchange Commission,
declined comment.

Here's what's at stake. Let's say that AT&T buys NCR for $ 7 billion, or $
105 a share. If you pool, you add AT&T's profits to NCR's. So last year, the
AT&T-NCR combo would have earned $ 3.1 billion -- AT&T's $ 2.7 billion and
NCR's
$ 360 million. If there were no pooling, AT&T-NCR would have earned around $
2.6
billion -- less than AT&T made without NCR.

Here's why. NCR's tangible net worth -- the value of its plants, real estate
and other things you can see and touch -- is about $ 2 billion. The other $ 5
billion AT&T would pay is for non-tangible assets like NCR's work force and
its
technology. If AT&T can't use pooling, it has to charge its earnings for the
$ 5
billion it paid for NCR's non-tangible assets.

Normally, you get up to 40 years to write off the non-tangibles. Willens
estimates that because computer technology changes so rapidly, AT&T would have
to write off the $ 5 billion over no more than 10 years. That works out to $
500
million a year.

Even though the $ 500 million charge isn't real money -- it requires no cash
outlay and is purely an accounting item -- AT&T will think twice before
throwing
$ 500 million a year of profit out the window. The more NCR can sabotage
AT&T's
accounting, the less AT&T can offer for NCR. And the greater chance NCR has of
staying independent, even though shareholders have overwhelmingly voted to
sell.

This doesn't mean, by the way, that if AT&T can't do pooling, it will walk
away from NCR. The fact that AT&T has made a cash offer -- you can't pool if
you
buy a company for cash -- shows that it's willing to buy NCR without pooling.
Logic suggests, however, that AT&T would offer more money if it can pool than
it
will offer if it can't.

I happen to believe, as NCR Chairman Charles Exley Jr. does, that AT&T will
mess up NCR should its takeover attempt succeed. But Exley has undermined
NCR's
claim to the moral high ground by saying that he would listen to a $ 125 a
share
offer. Of course, his latest ploy is designed to make sure that AT&T can't
offer
that much, or anything close to it.

I asked NCR about the dividend, trying to see if I was missing something.
NCR's answer, read to me by a public relations person, consisted of legalese.
The gist of it: The dividend compensates NCR holders for the fact that the
AT&T
tender offer has stopped NCR from buying its own shares on the open market.
There was "no other reason," the PR man said.

Right. And if you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you.

Allan Sloan is a columnist for Newsday in New York.

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH


Sure!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/18/2001 04:31 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: InterGen CA

Suz,

Please print two originals of this CA (in my CA directory) InterGen North
America CA May 18 rev 1.

Thanks,

Kay


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <financewise-return-5-20589482@listbot.com>
Received: from  rly-yd04.mx.aol.com (rly-yd04.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.4]) by
air-yd01.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:59:09 -0500
Received: from  lbmail11.listbot.com ([204.71.191.9]) by rly-yd04.mx.aol.com
(v70.21) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:58:39 -0500
Received: (qmail 11359 invoked by uid 108); 22 Mar 2000 16:58:29 -0000
Date: 22 Mar 2000 16:58:29 -0000
Message-ID: <953744309.9262.qmail@ech>
To: List Member <vkaminski@aol.com>
Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact financewise-help@listbot.com
From: RiskBrief <rminto@risk.co.uk>
Delivered-To: mailing list financewise@listbot.com
Subject: issue 4
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mailman.enron.com id
GAA13076

 - http://www.financewise.com/risk

============================================================
RiskBrief issue 4
From FinanceWise: the only dedicated financial search engine
============================================================
22 March 2000

Dear RiskBrief subscribers

The fourth edition is here, and this month's theme is weather.
Weather derivatives is increasingly a hot topic on the web at the
moment. Four sites have been launched in the last three months,
including tradeweather.com, weather-risk.com and WeatherRiskAdvisory.com.
Along with the weather trading site from Liffe (I-WeX.com),
launched in January, and the introduction last September of
weather futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), there is
something of a rush on.

To provide you with an online resource to weather risk, we have
an introductory guide, two site reviews, 22 articles and an
exclusive book offer.

http://www.tradeweather.com (see site reviews)
http://www.weather-risk.com (see site reviews)
http://www.WeatherRiskAdvisory.com
http://www.i-wex.com
http://www.cme.com/news/weather921.html

How fast will the weather derivatives market grow? Will there be
enough liquidity? Let us know what you think.

In the meantime, please enjoy the rest of this month's issue,
with 14 articles on currency trading, e-trading, and news of conferences,
jobs and more.

Regards

Rob Minto
Producer, FinanceWise
rminto@risk.co.uk

Before you forget, why not forward this e-mail to a
colleague / friend now, who might find our coverage of
risk management on the web a useful resource?

CONTENTS:
==============================
>> Weather risk guide
>> Site reviews
>> Articles and features: weather risk, e-trading, currency trading
>> New #1 site
>> Book special offer: Insurance and Weather Risk
>> Conferences & training
>> New jobs

Please view the newsletter online and get the full story:
http://www.financewise.com/cgi-bin/l/lrrpre?P=/l/riskbrief1unreg.htm

This month's sponsor:
==============================
CREDIT:
The new forum for international credit markets.
With its mix of news, features, data and technical articles,
credit magazine is a vital source of information for all investors,
issuers and market professionals operating in the global
credit markets.
SUBSCRIBE BEFORE APRIL TO CLAIM A 40% DISCOUNT
http://www.creditmag.com

WEATHER RISK GUIDES:
==============================
Introduction to weather derivatives from the CME. A market history,
plus a discussion of pricing and analyzing weather contracts.
http://www.cme.com/weather/introweather.html

An overview article from James Roemer of the WeatherRisk Institute.
http://www.investaweather.com/commo/roemers_theory.htm

Bob Dischel's site on weather derivatives, with articles, links and
seminar details.
http://www.wxpx.com

For further links to weather derivatives online see the html version:
http://www.financewise.com/cgi-bin/l/lrrpre?P=/l/riskbrief1unreg.htm

SITE REVIEWS:
==============================
Who is doing what on the web? A double helping of site reviews this month:

-New bond trading site from JP Morgan Bear Stearns, Chase
Manhattan and Moneyline
-Weather derivatives trading & info: Enron's weather-risk.com
& Tradeweather.com
-Foreign-exchange trading from Financial Market Solutions
-The French Tr,sor site covering sovereign bond issues
-Algorithmic's risk management methodology - 'mark-to-future'

-Rent applications and analytical tools from Cygnifi, a new web
offering from JP Morgan, Bridge & Sybase
-Revamped Inventure.com site - provider of data & analytics
-Keep up to date on new-issue markets with S&P's new site
http://www.financewise.com/cgi-bin/l/lrrpre?P=/l/riskbrief1unreg.htm

ARTICLES & FEATURES:
==============================
14 new articles and features have been added to the FinanceWise
Risk Management Special Report. The new supplements are:
-Electronic Trading
-Currency Risk

Continuing our theme of weather, we also have two editions of
weather risk. These 22 articles include glossaries and technical
articles on data and forecasting, options pricing, emissions
trading and weather-linked bonds.
http://www.financewise.com/cgi-bin/l/lrrpre?P=/l/riskbrief1unreg.htm

#1 SITE
==============================
The new #1 site on FinanceWise is the Picture of Risk site
from Risk Metrics, displacing Finmath.com (triple #1 award winner)
as the most visited site in February. Click below to view the
latest rankings
http://www.financewise.com/rankings

BOOK SPECIAL OFFER: EXCLUSIVE
==============================
And completing our weather coverage for this month, there is a
10% discount available exclusive to RiskBrief subscribers on:
"Insurance and Weather Derivatives
From Exotic Options to Exotic Underlyings"

For further details and information see:
http://www.financewise.com/cgi-bin/l/lrrpre?P=/l/riskbrief1unreg.htm

There are other special offers available on the Risk Books site:
http://www.riskbooks.com

CONFERENCES & TRAINING
==============================
Full details are now online for Risk 2000. Risk's 6th annual US
derivatives and risk management congress will be held in Boston
on June 13 & 14. Keynote speakers: Myron Scholes and Jeffrey Skilling.
http://www.riskpublications.com/risk2000us

JOBS
==============================
This month, the search term "Jobs" has moved up to 5th position in the
FinanceWise rankings.
http://www.financewise.com/rankings

If you were one of those searching for "jobs", don't forget our own
job search section. It currently holds 46 treasury and risk management, a
record 29 additions since the last Brief.
Visit the job search and select the job category
"Finance: Treasury and Risk Mgmt".
http://www.financewise.com/jobs

                        *       *       *
Also:
==============================
Please e-mail us if there is anything you would like to see
in this newsletter, or any questions that you would like
addressed. RiskBrief now reaches over 1200 subscribers
worldwide. So if you have something interesting to say, or
an opinion to share with all your fellow subscribers send
your comments to:
rminto@risk.co.uk

P.s. Also suggest sites for us to review / index

If this has been forwarded to you, please subscribe to
receive your own copy at:
http://www.financewise.com/cgi-bin/l/lrrpre?P=/l/riskbrief1unreg.htm

Are you registered with FinanceWise? If not, please click:
http://www.financewise.com
You will then have the full functionality of the site.

If you have any problems with this newsletter, please
contact me:
rminto@risk.co.uk

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to financewise-unsubscribe@listbot.com

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to financewise-unsubscribe@listbot.com


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,
Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these outages.
In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted like the daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.
Greg Elliott
IIR Energy
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.
 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 013102R.xls


I wanted to give you a quick update on ConfirmLogic....

Testing was done last week on the ConfirmLogic module.  On Thursday, we discussed with Kathryn Cordes and the ConfirmLogic IT team the items that we had found that were "show stoppers" as far as releasing the product for Beta Testing.  Some of the major Items found were the inability to properly handle Basis Swaps for Gas and inability to display meaningful Index References for Power (they were pulling in a code rather than a description of the Index).

The team worked on the "fixes" and migrated the code last night.  Today during testing, they found that the new code had actually caused problems with the fixed price and volume information, which was working previously.  I talked to Kathryn and she said that the were rebuilding the code.  She said that someone had tested the fix last night and everything worked fine.  We plan more testing in the morning.

They are doing a high-level demo this Thursday for Beta Customers just to introduce the module.  They were planning on having more extensive Beta demos for each client starting next week but realize that those may have to postponed further.

We have told them that we would not sign off for Beta testing until we were comfortable that the items that we identified were working.  We need consistent, stable days of testing before I will feel comfortable.

Overall, we like the "new" streamlined version of the screens and feel that it will be a good product if they can work out the data display issues.

Call with any questions.

Kim Theriot


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 81141 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Yo!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Symes, Kate
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 8:42 AM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	APS Line Loss Payback

For 7/31:

Tag is 28433.
Deals are 711170 and 711190.

Let me know if we run into any problems with these.

Thanks,
Kate


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001 07:45 PM -----

	Vicki Sharp@EES
	03/14/2001 03:03 PM

		 To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, David W
Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, James Derrick/Enron@EnronXGate, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Tom Riley/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Summary of Enron's filing in UC/CSU case

Attached is a summary of the Enron's motion in opposition to  UC/CSU's motion
for an expedited hearing schedule.  The documents will be filed later today
and circulated to the working group.  Once this filing is made we will turn
our efforts to preparing our answer to their complaint, and continue
developing our strategy on the counterclaim.

Thanks to Bob Williams, Mike Smith,  Evan Hughes,  Jeff Dasovich, Dennis
Benevides, Peggy Mahoney,and Tom Riley for their efforts in this matter.


This is to go over the documents for the Elba Island LNG supply to Southern
for the Macintosh site.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 10:08 AM -----

	Vanessa Griffin/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/15/2001 10:04 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confirmation of Conference Room: EB 3872; 1:00 - 2:30 PM today


This is a follow up on the conference call during which Pam Hill of Mirant
mentioned this documents.  MAAC's comments regarding RTOs future role in
reliability standards could have a significant impact on the ongoing NERC
organization standards process.  The NAERO working group will review these
documents and consider what recommendations, if any, to make to the full
Regulatory Affairs Committee.

 - 20010607_resolution.pdf
 - 20010607_rev_nerc.pdf


we might need to hit his parents up for some of those, this may sound gay,
but I'll bet they would like it, we could give it to them as a present, a
video slide show of Max and Jen growing up and meeting.  Their parents might
already be doing this but they did it at Josh and Lisa's (cousin) wedding
and it was cool.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 11:14 AM
To: merlinm@uswest.net
Cc: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com; merlinm@uswest.net;
pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com; ralee@rmi.net; Morrill, Scott
Subject: Re: Jen and Max!!!!

does anyone have a picture of max when he used to walk around and flex his
pecs?


Jeff Skilling
Mike McConnell
Greg Piper
John Arnold

Thank you for agreeing to interview with Vijay Vaitheeswaran of the Economist on Tuesday.  Mike is scheduled for 12:30, Jeff for 2 p.m., Greg for 3 p.m. and John for 4 p.m.

Vijay is working on a story about old economy companies embracing the Internet.  He'll be testing the idea put forward by Erik Brynjolfsson of MIT that companies profiting most from the Internet are ones with a culture of openness.  As background, he has secured an advance copy of a new Harvard Business School case on EnronOnline, which basically outlines the advent of EOL.  It's a story that you all know well, and so you should not be disadvantaged if you don't have a copy of the study. (I can give you one if you want it.)

Specifically, he'll be probing:
How did the company begin to think about using the Internet?  Have our views altered?
What role models did we use?
What changes have worked best and why?
How far has success been dependent on changing corporate culture? Has it gone far enough?
What has been the impact on staffing?  Do we have the right people to do what needs to be done?
Has the Internet made -- or will it make -- substantial cost savings?  What is the scale of investment needed?
Will the Internet change the way we work with suppliers/distributors (where applicable).

Other companies on the list to be interviewed include GE, 7-Eleven, Siemens, Merrill Lynch, Cemex and Valeo.

Let me know if you have any questions.  Otherwise, I'll see you in the afternoon.

Vance Meyer


Leslie,

Yes, you are correct.  If you can send me the NDA with any modifications that
you require, I'll send it back to Xuma for their signature.

Thanks,
Laura

	Leslie Hansen@ECT
	10/23/00 11:16 AM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: one more NDA

Laura:

Am I correct in understanding that Xuma signed the EBS form without
modification?  If that is the case, we should prepare the NDA with Enron Net
Works LLC as the party in lieu of EBS and have Xuma execute the revised
agreement.  In the future, we need to use the Net Works form of NDA; however,
since the EBS form has already been sent to and accepted by the Counterparty,
I'm okay using this form.

Regards,

Leslie Hansen

	Laura Howenstine@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/23/2000 10:23 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: one more NDA

Tana/Leslie,

Attached is the NDA that we used with Xuma.  They've signed it in hard copy
and sent it back to me, but since then our group has switched from EBS to Net
Works.  Please advise as to how you need to modify this.

Thanks,
Laura

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 10/23/00 10:07 AM
-----

	Robin Hill
	09/12/00 03:44 PM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: one more NDA

Here is the NDA for XUMA.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net

	Laura Howenstine
	09/12/00 02:48 PM

		 To: Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: one more NDA

Thanks, Robin.  I actually have another NDA to ask you for and it's a last
minute request for a meeting that I'm attending tomorrow in San Francisco
(for which I'm leaving in an hour or so).

The counter party is a company called XUMA.  The relevant info is below.
Thanks and I'll follow the same procedure as with onexchange.

Regards,
Laura

NDA needed for:
XUMA
160 Pine Street - #200
San Francisco, CA 94111

	Robin Hill
	09/12/00 12:37 PM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA

Here is the NDA.  Please select the "Read Only" option in order to open and
print.  Please print 2 originals for signature so each party has an original
executed NDA, or you may e-mail it to them as long as they follow up with 2
originals.  After the other party executes it, you will need to get an EBS
attorney to initial it before an EBS VP or above can execute it on our
behalf.  If you have any questions please call me and please make sure I get
an executed original back.  Thanks.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net

	Laura Howenstine
	09/11/00 04:31 PM

		 To: Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA

Hi Robin,

The information that you require for the NDA is in the message below.

Thanks.

Regards,
Laura

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 09/11/00 04:33 PM
-----

	ed@onexchange.com
	09/11/00 02:17 PM

		 To: Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA

Hi Laura,

Here's all the info:

Ed Cuoco
onExchange
Reservoir Place
1601 Trapelo Road
Waltham, MA 02451
781.672.3400  x223
781.672.3408  fax
www.onexchange.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Laura_Howenstine@enron.net [mailto:Laura_Howenstine@enron.net]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:00 PM
To: Ed Cuoco
Subject: NDA

Ed,

I'm sorry to bother you with this, but I have not been able to pull up your
street address on your web site - I get a message that the server is busy.
If
you send me the relevant info on Onexchange, as requested below, I'll send
it on
to our legal department to expedite the NDA.

Thanks.

Regards,
Laura

Laura Howenstine
Manager, Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0308 (office)
713-304-7819 (mobile)
laura_howenstine@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 09/11/00 01:59
PM
-----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Robin Hill   |
|        |                       |
|        |          09/11/00     |
|        |          12:24 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |       To:     Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
|
  |       cc:
|
  |       Subject:     NDA
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

Laura, please send me the full legal name and address of the company and I
will
draft the NDA for you to forward to the client.  Thanks.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net


Here's a draft.  My suggestion is that we submit it to Rick in draft, then
get comments from Sue and Sandy.    We don't have time for a lot of internal
review.


The report named: Enron Americas Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=102&report_name=Enron+Americas+Position+Report&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/15/2001>, published as of 11/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

FINAL


print
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 11:08 AM -----

	Mark Tawney/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/07/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: International Employees working on Weather

London:  Ross McIntyre

Oslo:  Bjarne Shieldrop
  Didrik Thrane-Nielsen
  Frank Lien
  Oystein Rognes
  There may be a couple of others part-time.

Sydney: Raymond Yeow
  Christian Werner

Tokyo:  Morten Erik Petersen
  Takuro Shioda


they are sending revisions for the weekend #'s

"Melissa Jones" <mjones7@txu.com> on 11/13/2000 10:01:32 AM
To: "Charlie Stone" <cstone1@txu.com>, "Gary Green" <ggreen2@txu.com>,
daren.j.farmer@enron.com, gary.a.hanks@enron.com,
carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, earl.tisdale@enron.com, "David Avila"
<davila1@txu.com>, Liz.Bellamy@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Enron / HPL Actuals for November 10-12, 2000

November 10, 2000

     Teco Tap       40.000 / Enron ; 66.667 / HPL IFERC

November 11, 2000

     Teco Tap       40.000 / Enron ; 104.583 / HPL IFERC

November 12, 2000

     Teco Tap       40.000 / Enron ; 110.000 / HPL IFERC


FYI, the Aug. 14 issue of Fortune is their retirement special, and Enron is
one of "10 stocks to last the decade."  Awesome article.

Check it out:
http://www.fortune.com/fortune/2000/08/14/pre.html


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football292.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Attention Fantasy Players! Cant find that perfect gift? Let MVP.com make it easy for you! Save 10% on your next purchase when you purchase a Gift Certificate from now until 12/27/01. Click Here for Details.

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1218e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1218c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1218v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1218t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1218ftl.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

Standings, Summary

East Division

Team	W	L	T	Pct	Back	Strk
	Div	Wks	PF	Back	PA

McKay Neal	12	3	0	0.800	0.0	W4	12-3-0	6.5	1080.0	0.0	763.0

Eric Bass	10	5	0	0.667	2.0	W1	10-5-0	1.0	866.0	214.0	737.0

Martin Cuilla	9	6	0	0.600	3.0	W1	9-6-0
3.5	1019.0	61.0	982.0

Hunter Shively	6	9	0	0.400	6.0	L1	6-9-0	0.0	982.0	98.0	1019.0

Rocks	5	10	0	0.333	7.0	L1	5-10-0	0.0	737.0	343.0	866.0

FIBSABs	3	12	0	0.200	9.0	L4	3-12-0	0.0	763.0	317.0	1080.0

West Division

Team	W	L	T	Pct	Back	Strk
	Div	Wks	PF	Back	PA

Fear	12	3	0	0.800	0.0	W1	12-3-0	0.0	841.0	239.0	625.0

Tori Kuykendall	11	4	0	0.733	1.0	W5	11-4-0	0.0	856.0	224.0	705.0

The Klap	9	6	0	0.600	3.0	L2	9-6-0	2.0	960.0	120.0	888.0

Matt Lenhart	6	9	0	0.400	6.0	W2	6-9-0	2.0	888.0	192.0	960.0

Baja	4	11	0	0.267	8.0	L5	4-11-0	0.0	705.0	375.0	856.0

Top Dogs	3	12	0	0.200	9.0	L1	3-12-0	0.0	625.0	455.0	841.0

Statistics, Scoring

Eric Bass Actives

Player	Pos	Scoring	Score

Grbac, Elvis	QB	181 PaYd (9 Pts)	9.0

Allen, James	RB	 	0.0

Smith, Robert	RB	 	0.0

Harrison, Marvin	WR	127 ReYd (12 Pts), 1 ReTD (39) (6 Pts)	18.0

Hayes, Donald	WR	77 ReYd (7 Pts)	7.0

Horn, Joe	WR	55 ReYd (5 Pts), 2 ReTD (11,10) (12 Pts)	17.0

Nedney, Joe	K	2 FG (22,21) (6 Pts), 1 XP (1 Pt)	7.0

Ravens	DT	3 Int (6 Pts), 3 SACK (3 Pts), 1 DFR (2 Pts),  PA (6 Pts)	17.0

TOTALS	 	 	75.0

Eric Bass Reserves

Player	Pos	ST	Scoring	Score

Anders, Kimble	RB	RS	 	0.0

Davis, Terrell	RB	RS	 	0.0

Lions	DT	RS	1 SACK (1 Pt)	1.0

McNabb, Donovan	QB	RS	232 PaYd (11 Pts), 31 RuYd (3 Pts)	14.0

Morris, Sylvester	WR	RS	 	0.0

Robinson, Marcus	WR	RS	 	0.0

TOTALS	 	 	 	15.0

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Jerome Bettis, RB PIT - Fear Updated 12/25/01
Bettis is listed as questionable for Week 16. However, he may be able to return to the Steelers' starting lineup. Bill Cowher said Bettis is progressing, and he will be used this week if healthy.

Todd Bouman, QB MIN - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Bouman is now listed as probable for Sunday's game. He should be able to start against the Jaguars, but he may play with some pain in his thumb.

Jeff Graham, WR SD - Martin Cuilla Updated 12/23/01
Graham probably won't play Sunday at Kansas City because of the death of his father in a car accident, coach Mike Riley said Friday. If Graham doesn't play, Trevor Gaylor will start in his place and Nate Turner will be signed off the practice squad. The Chargers are already missing their No. 3 receiver, Tim Dwight, due to complications of a collapsed lung.

Antowain Smith, RB NE - Baja Updated 12/23/01

Smith rushed for a career-high 156 yards and a touchdown Saturday. He has been one of the best runners in the AFC and will help carry your team to Fantasy glory.

Steve McNair, QB TEN - Rocks Updated 12/23/01
McNair played Saturday despite suffering from back spasms all week. He played well, throwing a touchdown pass in the second half. Expect him to be a solid No. 1 QB.

Jeff Garcia, QB SF - Martin Cuilla Updated 12/23/01

Garcia, whose practice time was limited all week, played in Saturday's game. He admitted afterwards that he has a cracked rib. He played with extra padding, saying it didn't greatly affect his throws. Garcia might not be at full strength in the remaining weeks but he will still be a solid No. 1 Fantasy QB.

Eddie George, RB TEN - Fear Updated 12/23/01
George played in Saturday's game despite suffering from an ankle injury. He left in the third quarter because of a neck injury but returned to the game.

Oronde Gadsden, WR MIA - Baja Updated 12/23/01

Gadsden did not play in Saturday's game against the Patriots because of a hamstring injury. Chris Chambers started in his absence.

Fred Beasley, RB SF - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01
Beasley broke his right hand. He will probably be sidelined for the rest of the regular season.

Joe Horn, WR NO - Eric Bass Updated 12/21/01
Horn is once again performing like an elite Fantasy receiver. He is a must-start player during the final weeks of the NFL season.

Maurice Smith, RB ATL - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
A banged-up Smith hasn't done much statistically in recent weeks. Don't depend on him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Donald Hayes, WR CAR - Eric Bass Updated 12/21/01
Hayes may step back into the forefront this week as the No. 1 wideout in place of Muhsin Muhammad. He isn't very explosive, however, and won't help Fantasy teams much during Weeks 15 through 17.

Chris Weinke, QB CAR - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Consider Weinke as a backup during the Fantasy playoffs. He lacks the weapons to post better-than-average numbers, but he is a good option if you need an emergency QB.

Kurt Warner, QB STL - Baja Updated 12/21/01
Warner should guide many Fantasy teams to success during the playoffs. Expect fine numbers from him the rest of the way.

Rich Gannon
, QB OAK - McKay Neal Updated 12/21/01
Gannon has been a top-flight Fantasy QB this year. He will be a key player on many title teams, and should never be benched.

Randy Moss, WR MIN - Hunter Shively Updated 12/21/01
Moss started off slow this season but has once again been one of the best wideouts. Don't hesitate to start him during your playoff run.

Marvin Minnis, WR KC - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01

Minnis hasn't done much to help Fantasy owners this year. Don't use him during the remaining weeks of the NFL season.

Michael Westbrook, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Westbrook has been inconsistent this season as a Fantasy player. He will be a good No. 2 at best during your playoffs.

Rod Gardner, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Gardner has been very inconsistent this season. Unless you play in a deeper league, starting Gardner isn't advisable.

Tony Richardson, RB KC - Top Dogs Updated 12/21/01
Richardson hasn't been a consistent scoring threat this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy playoffs.

Tony Gonzalez, TE KC - The Klap Updated 12/21/01
Gonzalez hasn't played as well as expected this year. Still, he is too talented to bench during the Fantasy playoffs.

Brett Favre, QB GB - The Klap Updated 12/21/01

Favre has been one of the best QBs this season. Count on him to help lead your team to Fantasy glory.

Trent Green, QB KC - The Klap Updated 12/21/01
Green has been an inconsistent Fantasy QB this year. He is a risky start during the rest of the season.

Bill Schroeder, WR GB - Rocks Updated 12/21/01
Schroeder has had a solid season. Look for him to be a reliable No. 2 wideout during your postseason.

Matt Hasselbeck, QB SEA - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Hasselbeck has been a big disappointment this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy postseason.

Johnnie Morton, WR DET - Matt Lenhart Updated 12/21/01
Morton has been inconsistent this season but he will still be a solid No. 2 during the Fantasy playoffs. Keep him in your lineup.

Reggie Wayne, WR IND - Free Agent
Updated 12/21/01
Wayne is healthy again, and showing signs of improvement. But he is not accomplishing enough statistically to help most Fantasy teams.

Amani Toomer, WR NYG - McKay Neal Updated 12/21/01
Toomer is having a bit of a down year, but his potential to post solid Fantasy numbers makes him worth considering. He should be a solid No. 2 wideout during your playoffs.

Marvin Harrison, WR IND - Eric Bass Updated 12/21/01

Harrison will be an important Fantasy player during the final weeks of the NFL season. He will have some good outings, even though the Colts are not in the playoff race.

Duce Staley, RB PHI - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01
Staley started to play well late in the season. Be sure to keep him into your starting lineup. He will be an adequate back for the playoffs.

More Updates
Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


Mary:  Can you assign Susan to this one since she's already working on the
omnibus and revising a prior trade?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001 06:03 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	04/18/2001 04:29 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Consolidated Edison Comopany of New York

Can't recall if I asked you to reassign to another paralegal.  Please let me
know.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT on
03/14/2000 05:31 PM ---------------------------

MARY THERESA FRANKLIN
03/14/2000 05:31 PM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Brenda H
Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNR Contracts

We have had an unexpected death in my family, requiring me to be out of the
office the rest of the week.   I am sorry the timing is so bad, I will
contact Robert first thing next week and we can workout a game plan going
forward.  Thanks for your patience...

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT on
03/14/2000 05:08 PM ---------------------------
To: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNR Contracts

The contracts are the transportation agreements on CNR.  Robert sat with
Chris Germany yesterday and to our knowledge these gathering contracts have
never been set up in our systems.

I'll be in meetings until 3:30, so please feel free to talk to Robert Allwein
down on 30.  Actually, I think it would be a great idea to spend a few
minutes talking about this to get on the same page before anyone gets too far
into the process and we discover that rework is being done.

MARY THERESA FRANKLIN
03/14/2000 01:35 PM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNR Contracts

I just meet with Gloria to decipher what the status is on all her E-mails.
She's identified all the remaining rate changes needed for today's payments,
the transport contracts needed to be setup, Sitara numbers needed for
contracts already set up, and the meters needing to be linked to transport
contracts.  I'm still fuzzy on this whole process and am not sure what Robert
Allwein's 60 or 70 contracts relate to... are these purchase contracts?
I'll be up shortly, working with Brenda... let's see if a meeting would be
good.


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=09/07/2001>, published as of 09/07/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


The attached bulletin from Merrill has some interesting comments on the
California situation as it relates to the utilities.


When: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS 06112

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

NEW TIME
Please accept this invitation, as it will automatically populate onto your calendars.

Thank you,

Irena Hogan
x36143


Please see attached.

After you put Ken's signature on this, please email it to Joe Hartsoe.  Also
send it via email to Dan Watkiss - his email address is

 dwatkiss@bracepatt.com

Thanks.


AGA for 6/23/00 is 73


10:30 meeting is delayed until further notice.  Sounds like what I indicated in the meeting is occuring and UBS will manage the contracts.

Regards,

Mo.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 9:21 AM
To:	Elafandi, Mo; Baughman, Edward; Racicot, Paul; May, Tom; Semperger, Cara; Purcell, Mike
Subject:	RE: West Power transition of trading/sceduling activities

I already have a commitment at 9:30 so will be unable to make it.  We will have represenation from the Portland cash and scheduling team there.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Elafandi, Mo
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 9:05 AM
To:	Baughman, Edward; Belden, Tim; Racicot, Paul; May, Tom; Semperger, Cara; Purcell, Mike
Subject:	RE: West Power transition of trading/sceduling activities

Portland,

Please plan on meeting in Mt. Bachelor at the appointed time.

Thanks,

Mo.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baughman, Edward
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 8:48 AM
To:	Belden, Tim; Racicot, Paul; May, Tom; Semperger, Cara; Elafandi, Mo; Purcell, Mike
Subject:	West Power transition of trading/sceduling activities

Please plan to attend a conference call at 11:30 AM Central (9:30 PST) to discuss logistics for transferring activities supporting non-terminated West Power contracts.

Houston: Meet in ECS 4712

Portland: MO- Please let me know what conference room phone # we should call.

Thanks


The following Late/Pending nom has been rejected:

Company: 000236    Arng: 37147-15055    Eff Date: 2001-11-27

                          Nominated
           Location        Quantity

Receipt    P1037320           5,000
Delivery   P1037147           5,000

REJECTED REASON: POOL OUT OF BALANCE

This document was created by TCO0060  in the DB2P subsystem in TRANS ID SMI0, program TJ90018


I have received it.
Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com  works beter

Dad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vince Kaminski <vincek@cs.stanford.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Vince+20Kaminski+20+3Cvincek+40cs+2Estanford+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:02 AM
To:	vkaminski@aol.com; vkamins@enron.com
Subject:	Resume 3rd Try

Please check wrt accuracy and grammer.
Thanks.

--
Vince Kaminski
vincek@cs.stanford.edu
 - Resume-1.pdf << File: Resume-1.pdf >>


Hi everyone!
I have some pictures from the wedding I thought you might like:
 <<IMG11.JPG>>  <<IMG12.JPG>>  <<IMG04.JPG>>  <<IMG10.JPG>>  <<IMG09.JPG>>
Sincerely,
Jennifer Cronquist
Psychometrist
Personnel Decisions International
Houston
(713) 499-7505
jcronqui@pdi-corp.com http://www.personneldecisions.com

 - IMG11.JPG
 - IMG12.JPG
 - IMG04.JPG
 - IMG10.JPG
 - IMG09.JPG


Vince, Tani

FYI.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 10/11/2000
10:27 ---------------------------

	Calendar Entry

Research Meeting w/-Michael, John, Tani, Richard, Joe, Steve & Vince Kaminski
Brief description:
Date:
Time:

13/11/2000
15:00 - 15:45

Detailed description:

 Invitations

		Phone/Ext	Include
Chairperson:	John Sherriff/LON/ECT	37359	  Yes
Organised by:	Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT		  No

Invitations sent to:	Tracie McCormack
Kirsten Nelz
Steven Leppard

This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).


Just a reminder that I asked for your comments back to me today.  Thanks
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	rpetti@ladwp.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:03 PM
To:	srbateson@duke-energy.com; bondsr@bp.com; kbosley@reliant.com; halbourlon@reliantenergy.com; pabrown@socalgas.com; dacluff@duke-energy.com; duvalma@texaco.com; ffield@energy.twc.com; arcinc@flash.net; fgearyc@gte.net; greg_hood@oxy.com; wwhusse@ppco.com; carla.j.johnson@usa.conoco.com; ejohnsto@utilicorp.com; skatz@sempratrading.com; dkohler@br-inc.com; dkuhn@oneok.com; karl_kurz@anadarko.com; karim.manji@gs.com; pat_mulhern@oxy.com; anjn@dynegy.com; tom.roth@neg.pge.com; csupplee@utilicorp.com; Tholt, Jane M.; robert.turner@elpaso.com; judith.vogel@elpaso.com; Ward, Kim S (Houston); cweyman@astraoil.com; nancy.wojciehowski@williams.com; Sabrina Bienstock
Subject:	LADWP Gas Contract

Dear Potential Gas Supplier

As some of you may know our authority to buy gas off our existing spot agreement
will come to an end on December 31, 2001.  While we will honor current
commitments for gas to be delivered after that date, but we will not be able to
use the spot agreement to buy any more gas.  The reason that this is happening
is that our City Attorney has interpreted the new City Charter as not allowing
delegations of authority such as employed in the way we buy gas now.

We are seeking approval for an ordinance which must be approved by the City
Council that will restore our former ability to buy gas with the kind of
agreement most gas suppliers are familiar.  We have the ordinance approved by
the City Attorney and it will shortly be in the pipeline for approval by our
Board and the City Council, but until then, this contract is a stop gap to keep
us operating.

I've attached the new contract and a cover letter which explains what we are
doing.  The deadline is November 8, 2001 at 4:00 PM.  We will take the executed
contracts to our Board with the counterparties listed on a Board Resolution and,
if it is approved, we will be allowed to buy gas from this group after the new
year begins.  This is not the ideal contract but one we feel our Board will be
comfortable with until we can get around the Charter problem.  I can't make any
changes to this contract.  There is a notice published in the LA Times about the
availability of the contract but I am sending it to you directly as someone we
have already done business with (and undoubtedly have satisfied all our
boilerplate requirements) and will probably be interested in what we are trying
to do here.

I Hope most of you will respond.  Thanks

(See attached file: Spot Gas Cover Letter.doc)(See attached file: New Spot Gas
Contract.doc)

 - Spot Gas Cover Letter.doc
 - New Spot Gas Contract.doc


Yes, I'll ask her, but I also know someone else that sings at weddings
professionally!  Do you know what song?


During the Term of this ILA, EPMI shall be entitled to be paid a fee for  for
performance as follows:

i. EPMI shall be paid a fee equal to the sum of 1) the Incentive Fee which
shall not be less than $12,500 and 2) a fee of $1/MWhr above the delivered
price for purchases of Off-Peak Power (the fee of $1/MWh shall not be
included in the calculation of Savings), and  3) payment for the delivered
cost of market power purchased to serve MDEA,s and the Cities Native Load in
accordance with the transaction Confirmation.  Individual transactions will
be confirmed by written confirmation to be acknowledged and signed by EPMI
and jointly by MDEA, YCPSC and CPUC..
ii.  In the event that this ILA is terminated early, the minimum monthly
Incentive Fee amount shall be $12,500 divided by thirty (30) and multiplied
times the number of days in May in which this Agreement was in effect.
iii. The Incentive Fee shall consist of forty percent (40%) of the Total
Daily Savings.  Total Daily Savings is the product of (1) the Savings per MWh
calculated for the day, times (2) the total MWh for the same day of market
power purchased to serve system load.
iv. Savings per MWh is calculated as the positive difference between (a) the
MDEA Target Production Cost for units that would have run if market power
were not purchased to serve system load, and (b) the delivered cost of market
power purchased to serve system load.


I will forward your request to Darla Saruicer .. customer rep. for The New
Power


I feel awful about that--particularly since PGT did the same thing!  df

Steven Harris
02/01/2001 11:58 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Daily California Update.....

FYI. You should be ashamed asking PG&E to pay us up front for demand charges.
Apparently, California feels we are "predators"!
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron on 02/01/2001
11:57 AM ---------------------------
From: Lorna Brennan/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/01/2001 10:16 AM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Daily California Update.....

CPUC Votes to Keep Gas Flowing
A special session yesterday of California's regulators gave PG&E's utility
authority to amend its gas supply deals to keep supplies flowing to the state
past Feb. 7 when the current federal DOE emergency order expires, but it
postponed action on another PG&E request that Southern California Gas Co. ---
which has strongly objected --- be compelled to provide emergency supplies to
the PG&E utility's residential and small business customers.
Loretta Lynch, president of the California Public Utilities Commission, said
PG&E's utility is a "victim --- a victim of circumstances and a victim of
predatory practices by natural gas suppliers," now demanding payment for
future supplies up front --- not because the utility has failed to pay its
past gas bills, but because the electricity crisis has sapped its
credit-worthiness.
The CPUC action allows PG&E's utility to offer suppliers the option of
securitization or, in effect, a lien, in the utility's retail customers'
bills which cover the full cost of the wholesale gas prices as an incentive
to have the suppliers extend contracts with PG&E's gas utility operations
while the credit-worthiness of the company itself is dubious. It won't be
until next week when the utility begins negotiating new contracts, that it
will know if the CPUC action will overcome the suppliers reluctance to extend
contracts in the current situation, according to PG&E gas utility
spokesperson Staci Homrig.
On the operational side, PG&E on Wednesday declared a low-inventory OFO
because of a cold snap causing more supplies to be burned then pipeline
shippers were bringing into the system. The action was thought to help cause
the PG&E citygate price to jump from $11 to $17 on Wednesday. As for reports
of low storage, Homrig said that while the utility's supplies are very low,
they are adequate for the next week. They are not dipping into cushion or
base gas at this point, Homrig said.
Lynch said that PG&E has not defaulted on any payments, but nevertheless, in
what she considers predatory practices, the suppliers have required advance
payments or payment at the time supplies are provided. "These gas suppliers
are taking advantage of an emergency situation to extract another pound of
flesh," Lynch said in voting for the securitization measure. "Suppliers who
have been paid when due, are now saying regardless of existing agreements
'pay us today.' They are doing this in the coldest time of the year, so the
commissioners have to take these difficult steps to allow PG&E amend these
agreements in order to keep the gas flowing."
Part of the CPUC's action places a 90-day limit on the securitization option,
so with the way gas contracts work, in effect, it only provides about another
30 days' worth of supplies, said Homrig, who noted that almost all of PG&E's
25 to 30 suppliers have asked for special payment arrangements (advances,
cash-on-delivery or letters of credit) that the company cannot accommodate
because of its cash-flow crisis.~ Out of ongoing negotiations, the parties
came up with the securitization proposal in the customer account receivables,
thus, assuring them they will get paid.
On the gas side, PG&E has had sufficient revenues --- unlike its electric
business --- but the suppliers have not wanted to let the utility stick to a
normal payment arrangement because of the severe credit-rating decline in the
past weeks.
The CPUC met in San Francisco late Wednesday afternoon in the midst of a
whirlwind day of public announcements from the governor, state legislature,
consumer groups, regulators and utilities. A key piece was missing, however.
California state legislative leaders called off a morning briefing that was
to have offered the latest legislative proposals for dealing with the energy
crisis. Reportedly sticking points remain centered on the key questions of
who pays for the solutions and how deeply the state gets into the energy
business. A spokesman for the assembly speaker's office said he had no idea
when the briefing would be re-scheduled.
One piece of legislation that got through the state Senate (SB 1X) yesterday
authorizes another $500 million in emergency funds to purchase power. It also
would allow the state water resources department to be the utilities'
wholesale power supplier under long-term contracts at least through 2002. The
measure drew a protest from CPUC Commissioner Richard Bilas, who argued that
the state agency be "removed from that role as quickly as possible." The
bill, which was first passed by the state Assembly, was returned to assembly
committees last night to iron out changes made in the senate. It then would
have to be ratified again by the Assembly.
Meanwhile, consumer activists held rallies around the state protesting the
state bail-out of the private-sector utilities. This prompted at least one of
the utilities, Southern California Edison, to come out swinging, saying that
the recently released results of utility financial audits do not show any
"windfall profits" or diversion of monies from the utilities to the parent
company.
A letter surfaced in Washington from Gov. Gray Davis to the Senate Energy and
Natural Resources Committee, dated Jan. 30 and outlining measures the state
is taking to increase energy supply and decrease demand, sign long-term
contracts and maintain the financial viability of the state's public
utilities. The letter, a catalogue of recent initiatives already reported
here, contained no specifics on any long-term contracts nor legislation
signed that would address the immediate problem. Davis outlined measures
being taken to speed up siting of new power plants, saying an additional
2,000 MW would be online by the end of the year.
Responding to questions on another arena, Edison International's senior vice
president Tom Higgins said "everything is on the table" in the ongoing
negotiations between Davis' three-person negotiating team and the two
utilities, including dropping the pending lawsuit in federal court in Los
Angeles and crediting excess revenues from the utilities' own generation
against the whopping wholesale power cost under-collections.
The state remained under a power watch for the 16th day as the California
independent grid operator (Cal-ISO) urged conservation because "reserves
remain very low."


Frank,

This guy called me because he read the book I wrote about Natural Gas.  He
has some kind of special treatment with the federal government in terms of
gas purchases.  Sounds like a minority owned business to me.  Could you call
him or refer him to someone at EES?  Thanks,  Fletch Sturm

Don Cooper
703-683-6839


I'm trying to find good in this announcement but not much is coming from it.
I did have a good interview at Duke Business School last week.  I should be
hearing from NYU-Stern and Duke in the next couple of weeks.  What is my next
option?  Any suggestions regarding writing letters to anyone you know at Duke
or NYU?
Ben


Start Date: 1/9/02; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010910.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000
01:35 PM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:

Subject: FW: The best!

---------------------- Forwarded by Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000 01:26
PM ---------------------------

Jeff Coates@EES
11/17/2000 12:15 PM
To: Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: The best!

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Coates/HOU/EES on 11/17/2000 12:12
PM ---------------------------

C Kyle Griffin
11/17/2000 11:51 AM
To: Ken Byrd <ken@techquality.com> @ ENRON, lcc11@hypercon.com, "Merida L.
Carrabba" <mcarrabba@houston.rr.com> @ ENRON, Stephen C Griffin
<imsparky4u@juno.com> @ ENRON, "Michael Lanasa" <mlanasa@bc-arch.com> @
ENRON, Erik Songer <Erik.M.Songer@marshmc.com> @ ENRON, brandons@ctrec.com,
Monica Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, Amanda Boettcher/HOU/EES@EES, Tom
Donovan/ENRON@enronxgate, Jeff Coates/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy J
Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, Laura R Arnold/DUB/EES@EES, Morgan Babin/HOU/EES@EES,
Justin O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Elliott/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FW: The best!

This is a little weird, but nonetheless, funny.

---------------------- Forwarded by C Kyle Griffin/HOU/EES on 11/17/2000
11:41 AM ---------------------------

Aneela Charania@ECT
11/17/2000 11:35 AM
To: afshic@yahoo.com, C Kyle Griffin/HOU/EES@EES, rmchargue@kpmg.com,
pmundwiller@kpmg.com, Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT, nikunj@alltel.net,
christine.r.rodriguez@us.arthurandersen.com, shahzadd@hotmail.com,
sheilah.c.osowski@us.arthurandersen.com, barkat.charania@usa.net,
toral_vani@hotmail.com, gcharania@yahoo.com, ssadruddin@breakaway.com,
asma.meghani@chase.com, zroopani@kpmg.com, mali214@hotmail.com,
SDhanani@gulshaninc.com, alid8@aol.com, ma69132@email.msn.com
cc:
Subject: FW: The best!

 - West Palm Beach voters. (1).doc


Apologies for the spam, but due to popular demand  we are having an info
session for the Evening MBA students and for those of the  full time program
that can't make it earlier:
?
WHAT:??? LATIN AMERICA TRIP INFO  SESSION
?
WHEN: OCTOBER 3, 2000.? 7:30 PM -- 8:00  PM
?
WHERE:??? ROOM F318
?

I won't be there, but Richard Price,  President of Executive Tours will be
there answering all your questions.
?
Hope you can make it!
?
?
Also, the web site is up and running
?
http://web.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/lac/LAtrip/latrip.html
?
?
Jorge A. Viera
MBA 01
?
?


Start Date: 1/7/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010724.txt


Jennifer, Colleen:

To date, Kim Godfrey, George Zivic (in Bruce Harris' absence), and Lee
Jackson (in Alan Engberg's absence) have confirmed their participation.

SJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah-Joy Hunter/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000
10:34 AM ---------------------------

Lee Jackson@ECT
12/07/2000 09:46 AM
To: Sarah-Joy Hunter/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Engberg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Presentations to Compaq manufacturing and treasury executives,
December 14 from 2-3 PM

Wanted to confirm I will present to Compaq on Dec. 14.

Lee Jackson


I will be available by 9:05 AM.  I have to buy gas around 9 am every morning.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Proctor, Shemin V." <sproctor@akllp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:06 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: appalachian producers

Chris,
I  propose we meet/talk with Kathryn before noon tomorrow. Will you be able to do  to that?
Shemin
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris  [mailto:Chris.Germany@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:54  PM
To: Proctor, Shemin V.
Subject: RE: appalachian  producers

-----Original Message-----
From: Bussell l, Kathryn
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Proctor,  Shemin; Germany, Chris
Subject: appalachian  producers
We (EES) have  been getting December production payments ready -- what are your thoughts on  actually paying the post-petition pieces?   Besides Dominion,  we have producers off of Gatherco, Columbia Natural Resources,   Columbia Gas Transmission, Peoples Natural Gas, and East Ohio  Gas.    Are these on your list to review some day like you  are doing Dominion?     A few producers have called  wanting to know when to expect payment and I just need to know whether to  forge ahead to get caught up in getting their payments in the system, or to  wait in case we have the producers taken out of our pools on all these  pipes/ldc's.   It is a ton of work, and if it doesn't need to  happen, all the better, but if it does need to happen, I need to be working  on it now.

Also, only one  company listed above could provide daily actuals so the others are just  being split by 31 days.    I figured if the producer disputed  his split (if paid), he could provide the back-up to make it more  accurate.

Any comments  will be helpful.  Thanks.

**********************************************************************
This  e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may  contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended  recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is  strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to  receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp.  at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the  message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an  offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and  enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the  intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as  the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I would like to announce the following management changes within the Analyst
/ Associate Program, which are effective immediately.

Traci Warner will assume responsibility for Recruiting for the Western
Hemisphere.  Traci joined Enron's Associate Program in 1995 and has held
positions in Business Development, Origination, and Public Relations at Enron
Energy Services, Enron North America and Enron Broadband Services.

Ted Bland will assume responsibility for Career Development (including
rotations) for the Western Hemisphere.  Ted has been with Enron since 1989
and has held several roles in Origination and Business Development within
Enron Wholesale Services.  Most recently, Ted was assigned to the
commercialization of some activities within Human Resources.

Anna Jansson, who is based in London, will continue to lead all efforts for
the Associate / Analyst Program in the Eastern Hemisphere.  Anna has been
with Enron Europe for the past three years and, most recently, has been
responsible for setting up the EBS Human Resources function in Europe.

Please join me in working with Traci, Ted and Anna to ensure the success of
this important program.

Billy Lemmons
Vice President, Analyst / Associate Program


You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.

Sender:  johnodam@goforthlewis.com
Date:  Fri, 07 Dec 2001 15:29:46 -0600
Subject:  Fw: Spirit Of America - BEST I have seen yet
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound EXE Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'spiritofameric1.exe'.

If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release.  If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.

North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)

Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.


Why do our numbers look so high in the 4th quarter and then fall off so much?     We have to get a better handle on all of this and fast.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	FW:

fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Rob
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:

Tracy  -
As discussed.
Steve

 << File: enron corp infomation request-cons.xls >>

Rob Brown
Manager, Enron Corp.
Financial Accounting & Reporting
Off. 713.853.9702
Cell 713.303.4497
rob.brown@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Gilbert, Steve
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 3:56 PM
To:	Kleb, Steve; Keiser, John; Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Jones, Dana; Neubauer, Dave; Miller, Mary Kay; Kissner, Tim; Chandler, Bob; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	2002 Plan

The latest from a discussion with Rod, Mary Kay and Dave N. this morning:

FA&A will carry the depreciation - targets may be adjusted for yr to yr increase

IMP and FAS 106 will  be carried at FA&A ,Potential offsets to yr to yr increases are yet to be  determined.

Thus, the above items will not be put into the NNG Commercial Adaytum model.