You are receiving this message  as an opt-in subscriber to iExpect.com. The following message is a paid  advertisement brought to you by Winfreestuff.com. If you do not wish to  receive further messages from iExpect.com, please click on the unsubscribe  link below.
[IMAGE]

				[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 		[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE] 		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE] 			[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE] 		[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]			   Dear  PATRICE,    Enter  today  for your chance to win a new Chevy Tahoe SUV!  Designed for rugged , exceptional comfort, Tahoe offers  everything you'd want from an SUV.   By simply letting us know what you are interested in, you  will earn a chance to win this gorgeous vehicle. It's  as simple as that!     This could be the car of your dreams, but you can't win if you don't enter.    Already  entered previously? Improve  your odds by entering again!    Good Luck!  Stephanie & Mark  Co-Founders, winfreestuff.com   14210 Hillsdale Circle Omaha, NE 68137      You  are subscribed to this mailing under your pmims@enron.com e-mail  address.   You  are receiving this Special Offer as a valued iExpect.com  member. If you do not wish to receive any  Special Offers from us in the future, please click here   to unsubscribe.[IMAGE]      	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
				[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

 This creative design and copy, is the exclusive property of wfsDirect Inc and cannot be reproduced, modified, and/or reproduced without documented authorization.

[IMAGE]


Please review and forward comments to me early Thursday morning so we can
distribute along with a copy of my explanatory memo.  I will forward a
redraft of the memo to you for final review prior to distributing to John L
and Dave D.
Thanks


This is full translations of the Nikkei article which is based on the Brattle
Paper we released yesterday and on Steve's one-on-one interview. The article
occupied the half of P.3 of the newspaper whose circulation is 3.1 million.
Mika

 - Nihon Keizai 10516.doc


Included is an updated diagram of the proposed Chase prepay that includes
Stoneville - please let me know if you have any questions.  With regard to
Stoneville, Enron Hydrocarbons Marketing Corp. entered into an agreement in
December 1994 whereby Enron would sell to Mahonia and buy-back from
Stoneville (Stoneville Aegean Ltd) - a transaction very similar to this
prepay.  Thanks.

Michael


No, they can't.

They are planning on coming to the city sometime during the week between
Christmas and New Years (because Rory has not sent he legion of honor).

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:  Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 8:32 AM
To: Nancy Sellers
Cc: Cameron; 'Eldon Sellers'; Jeff Dasovich; Prentice Sellers; Prentice
@ Berkeley; Scott Laughlin
Subject: Re: I was thinking

That would work for me.  And presumably Rory and Co. could come then, too?

Nancy Sellers

<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:     "'Eldon Sellers'"
<Eldon@interx.net>,
ndavi.com>                     Cameron
<cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff Dasovich

<Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "Prentice @ Berkeley"
12/12/2000 10:06 AM
<PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
<PSellers@pacbell.net>,
Scott Laughlin
<scottwl@hotmail.com>

cc:

Subject:     I was
thinking

If you can all spend the night of the 23rd here - we could have our
"Christmas" together on the morning of the 24th??

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


what kind of odds.   the market is saying it's 8:1 chance.  I'm saying there
is a much better chance than that.  i think it's 2:1

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/11/2001 04:11 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: ng views

wanna wager on that?

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: Re: ng views

may = 495  the rest is the same

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/11/2001 09:04 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ng views

where's your curve now?
MAy
June
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Jan 02

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759


Rob, independent of dotted/solid lines, you already have the primary and
complete responsibility to manage the office and the business.  At the risk
of being bold,  I think the undercurrent of your note and your discussions
with Haedicke over the last couple of days is a matter of absolute control.
Ownership and passion are important characteristics of our best commercial
people but so is fostering a diversity of opinions and ideas.  With the back
and mid office,  the current Enron model is based upon scale and
standardization which generates tremendous operating leverage.  Further, it
helps us manage risk and is a board mandated control issue.   In the
long-run, it is actually less costly (ie) systems that don't work together,
less transferable human capital, un-managed legal risks, etc.

A lot of your points are very valid and Haedicke has never and never will get
in the way of managing commercial business; however, Mark, Wes, Sally, Beth
et al have a mandate to provide a flexible, scalable but standardized
delivery mechanism, that manages our risk across the broad empire.  Don't
quit protecting the business and your people; however, please help accomplish
some of these goals as well.

In short, I would like to keep the reporting structures the same.

Lets take the earliest opporunity to discuss this.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
09:41 AM ---------------------------

Rob Milnthorp
11/02/2000 09:17 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reporting Structure

Dave, at the risk of rocking the boat, I would like you to consider the
following. As you know, with the exception of Origination & Finance, all
other Canadian departments (Trading, Legal, Ops, Acctg, HR, Govt, & IT)
report directly to someone in Houston while having a dotted line to me.

In my mind, this is completely backwards (ie. it should be a solid line to
me, and a dotted line to their respective counterparts in Houston) for the
following reasons. First, performance feedback is not communicated to these
individuals in a timely manner if at all. Even when it is, more times than
not, it is perfunctory in nature. In fact, I think that feedback is given
somewhat reluctantly because the manager  in Houston has really no idea
whether the individual in Canada is doing a good job or not.

Second, it is sub-optimal. I seem to be spending more and more time dealing
with issues between the Canadian employee and their respective manager in
Houston. Many of these conversations revolve around my first point. Case and
point, we almost lost Laura Scott earlier this year because she was feeling
unappreciated and felt that her boss had no idea the hours/effort she was
putting in. And just yesterday, I had a very unsatisfactory phone call with
Mark Haedicke regarding Peter Keohane. The result - I now have a very
demotivated lawyer on my hands.

Third, it is costly. Having senior people fly up to Calgary/Toronto to "stay
in the loop" and to complete performance reviews is both costly from both a
dollar and time perspective.

Frankly, I'm not looking for more performance reviews to do, but I do think
its important that staff receive meaningful feedback in a timely fashion. I
know what these people do - I work with them every day. It is my job to lead,
inspire, and motivate but lately it feels like it is my job to liase between
Houston and the employee.

I would appreciate your thoughts on this.

Regards
Milnthorp


This looks good.  Please send this wherever it should go.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 06:07 PM
---------------------------

Stephen P Schwarz
07/06/2000 02:41 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Expense Report for Stephen Schwarz Dated 7/6/00

For your approval.

Stephen
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
02:39 PM ---------------------------

Kimberly Perkins
07/06/2000 10:39 AM
To: Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Expense Report for Stephen Schwarz Dated 7/6/00

Stephen,

Attached is your expense report.  Please let me know if any revisions are
required.  If no revisions are necessary, please forward to Sally for her
approval.  Thank you.

Kim


Could you guys please e-mail me your current cell phone and home phone #s?  I'll compile a list for Alma.  Merci.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carrillo, Alma
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:50 AM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Subject:	RE: On Call Schedule

Lorraine,
Do you have an update pager/cell/home list for the group?.  I have been told that I may not have the latest phone numbers for some group members.
Alma
36503

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:35 AM
To:	Carrillo, Alma
Subject:	On Call Schedule

Alma - Here is the updated TW on-call schedule.  Please call me if you have any questions.

 << File: On Call Schedule.xls >>

Lorraine


Approved.

Christine Stokes
05/31/2000 08:35 AM
To: Lorraine Lindberg, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Transwestern CAF Request

TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CONTRACT APPROVAL REQUEST

Please review the attached non-standard discount letter to Southwest Gas
Corporation (SWG).  SWG shall enter into a 10 year agreement  for 14,000
Dth/d of seasonal (November through March) capacity effective November 1,
2000.  The transport rate of $.15/Dth/d shall increase annually by
$.005/Dth/d.  The primary path shall be from Tranwestern's  East of Thoreau
(EOT) Area  to the SWG Interconnect located in the East of California Area.
Alternate receipt point rights shall be from Tranwestern's EOT Area and from
the Bloomfield Compressor.   SWG ROFR rights shall be wiaved. In
additionTranswestern shall propose  to retain revenues generated by capacity
release at rates higher than the effective contract's discount rate.

(Please note that the FTS-1 Appendix A - not shown here with the discount
letter-  specifically indicates 0 MMcf/d capacity for the April through
October period.  Therefore, even though the $.1500/MMBtu rate in Paragraph 3
of the discount letter does not indicate the rate is a "seasonal rate", the
effective billing to SWG shall be seasonal.)

Please indicate your approval via REPLY WITH HISTORY.   All Officer approvals
shall be faxed to Bill Cordes for final Officer approval.


This is a copy of your message sent to HeadhunterGal@talkmatch.com -->

Hello,

I ran across your email and was impressed.  I sent along my profile, take a look.  If there is any interest I'd like to hear back from you.

Paul

Click the following link to view the sender's profile:
http://www.match.com/doubleblind/showprofile.asp?UserID=484948454C4B4E&trackingid=65685

The following is my profile text:

Hello, I'm a down to earth person that likes to laugh and have a good time. I work in downtown Denver as a commodities trader for a large energy trading house. I do enjoy my career but understand life needs to be kept in prospective and be balanced. I enjoy activities over sitting and watching, but I have been known to sit in front of the TV and watch football or college basketball all day. I'm looking for someone who enjoys life and doesn't take themselves too seriously.

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.


This seems to be the best way of getting on top of all the meetings.  Let's discuss.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:50 AM
To:	'mark.bridges@ubsw.com'; 'pat.odonnell@ubsw.com'
Cc:	Forster, David
Subject:	Draft Governance

Below is the draft of our governance which I think works.  Let me know your thoughts and possibly we can discuss at this morning's meeting.  I will be participating by phone from the airport as I am on my way to Stamford.

As we move forward we have two huge tasks to complete at the same time, the integration with UBS Warburg and the re-start of our business.    The UBS corporate governance facilitates the creation of several committees which will meet on a regular basis to resolve issues and report on progress.  Within the UBS framework we will be creating a 'Transitional Steering Committee',  'Integration Committee' and 'Gas and Power Operating Committee'.

UBS has already created the Integration Committee which we will merge into.

Dave Forster will be attending all of these groups in the early weeks to ensure consistency and good communication.  Dave will also act as our point person for Mark Bridges from UBS, ensuring the simplest and most effective methods of communication are in place for both parties.

This email outlines the governance structure that will be formalized with immediate effect:

1.	Transitional Steering Committee:
This committee will be responsible for the overall management and co-ordination of the integration efforts for both the initial Launch Date and the later Disentanglement Date at the end of 2002.
Committee Members:
Mike Hutchins (co-chair)
Greg Whalley (co-chair)
Louise Kitchen
Pat O'Donnell
Mike Bolin
Proposed Logistics:
This committee will meet on a weekly basis until shortly after the Launch Date, and then bi-monthly thereafter until December 31 2002.
Minutes will be distributed to senior UBS and Enron management only.
Proposed Time	- Wednesday 8:30am CST

2.	Integration Committee:
This committee will be responsible for the day-to-day management and co-ordination of the integration efforts for both the initial Launch Date and the later Disentanglement Date at the end of 2002.  Any issues, which this committee cannot resolve, will be escalated to the Transitional Steering Committee.

Proposed UBS Energy Committee Members:
Louise Kitchen (co-chair)
Pat O'Donnell (co-chair)
Mark Bridges
Sally Beck  - Operations
Mark Haedicke - Legal
Wes Colwell - Financial Operations
Bill Bradford - Credit
David Port - Market Risk
Jay Webb - IT
Jenny Rub - Infrastructure
Peter Keohane - Canada
David Forster - ubswenergy.com
UBS counterparties
Proposed Logistics:
This committee will meet on a weekly basis until reviewed at December 31 2002.
Minutes will be distributed to the Transitional Steering Committee and team members as appropriate.
Time - Thursday 9:00am CST

3. 	Gas and Power Operating Committee:
This committee will be responsible for the operational running of the Gas and Power Trading business.   The initial focus of this group will be the re-starting of the business. Following the relaunch the purpose of the Management Committees will be to push through its strategic plans and targets globally, to be able to react to market changes quickly, and provide a forum for communication across all locations.  These committees should also maintain, and develop further, any synergies between the Gas and Power Business and other UBS businesses.

Proposed Committee Members:
Louise Kitchen (co-chair)
Greg Whalley (co-chair)
Tim Belden
Chris Calger
John Lavorato
Kevin Presto
Hunter Shively
Rob Milnthorp
Plus ad hoc members of the Logistical support functions as and when required.
?Proposed Logistics:
This committee will meet on a weekly basis but not before March 2002.

Prior to March 2002, this committee will be replaced by two sub-committees - the Operational Re-start Sub-Committee and the Commercial Re-start Sub-Committee.

3(i)		Operational Restart Sub-Committee
This subcommittee will be responsible for ensuring that the support functinality is full available at the restart date.

Proposed Sub-Committee Members:
Louise Kitchen (co-chair)
Pat O'Donnell (co-chair)
Mike Bridges
Sally Beck  - Operations
Mark Haedicke - Legal
Wes Colwell - Financial Operations
Bill Bradford - Credit
David Port - Market Risk
Jay Webb - IT
Jenny Rub - Infrastructure
Peter Keohane - Canada
David Forster - ubswenergy.com
Proposed Logistics:
This sub-committee will meet weekly until disbanded.
Time Tuesday 8:00am CST

3(ii)	Commercial Re-start Sub-Committee
This subcommittee will be responsible for ensuring that the UBS Warburg Energy Counterparties are capable of transacting with our new company in the shortest time possible and in the most efficient way for both the counterparty and UBS Warburg Energy.

Proposed Sub-Committee Members:
Louise Kitchen
Bryan Murtaugh - UBS Legal
Mark Taylor
Elizabeth Sager/Leslie Hansen
Mary Cook/Jeff Hodge
Bill Glass
Bill Bradford
Peter Keohane
Barry Tycholiz
Frank Vickers
Laura Luce
Rob Milnthorp
Chris Calger
David Forster
Other members to be announced
Proposed Logistics:
This sub-committee will meet weekly until disbanded.
Time Tuesday 10:00am CST

Tammie will notify each of you of the rooms etc.


same response as the last e-mail

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/01/2001 12:08 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: another option error - 597100

deal 597100
can you please ch the time to 2:00 p.m. not 2:00 a.m. for the exercise time.

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001
02:10 PM ---------------------------

Evelyn Metoyer
05/01/2001 02:02 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: option date - 597086

deal 597086
can you please ch the time to 2:00 p.m. not 2:00 a.m. for the exercise time.

Thanks


Tom,

The Doehrman #1 well came on line for first delivery on Monday, 2/7/00 at
11:45am.  The contract calls for intra-month pricing for deliveries that
commence after the first day of the month.  Please create a one month
baseload firm deal ticket for the remaining days of the month based on the
following information:

Counterparty    Meter   Volume   Price

Union Gas Operating Company  9825   500mmbtu/d   100% Gas Daily less $0.10

Susan will create a committed reserves firm ticket for the remaining term of
the deal once our geologists have gathered enough data to forecast the
reserves of this well; at such time, we will request that this ticket be
zeroed out.

If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


Hey--Just thought I'd let you know that Lacy went to school this morning-pale & not feeling well--stomach still hurts, but she went ahead.  She's stressing me out big time.  She acted like she couldn't hardly move, but I came back in the house & she was talking fine on the telephone.  But I ask her questions about how she feels & she is just about dead.  I don't know about her.  But she looked pale.  Blood sugar was a little low this morning.  I woke her up at 2 & had her check it & it was good. So I got a little more rest.  I don't think she even woke up enough to remember it.  I don't think the little job is good for her if she's gonna catch everything they have.  She's so careless about washing hands after handling all those nasty little kids & then bites her nails.  Not good!  Anyway, I'm stressed big time over her & over her driving the car. And missing so much school.  I wasn't going to take her to the dr. yesterday because she was better so I figured it was a virus, b!
ut she had to have a note from a doctor or she's gonna have to make up school on Saturday & they've threatened to fine me. So I had to pay $30 for them to tell me that she had a virus & missed a day of work.  Oh, well, life is fun.  Anyway, I need to quit gettin down over such trivial things cause there's so many with worse problems to face. I am thankful that the burdens are so light.  But you can still pray for us.  And encourage Lacy to work at Splash Town! Ha!
Remind me to tell you about the terroristic  threat at High School.  Another high stress time!  Can't wait until this weekend to see all my cousins & ya'll.  Kiss my grandsons for me.  Love ya


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
12:35 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Chris Connelly                           11/05/2000 11:43 AM

To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jez Peters/LON/ECT@ECT, Candace
Parker/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenny Nicoll/LON/ECT@ECT, Dimitri Taylor/LON/ECT@ECT,
Andy James/EU/Enron@Enron, Cornelia Luptowitsch/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Freight weekly report

Enron Shipping Services Weekly report 43/2000

Highlight
The cape market continues to rise almost daily with RBCT to Rotterdam at
$11.40 and Quennsland to Rotterdam at $15.5 in the spot market.  The driving
factor has not been coal as of late, but an unexpected rush of Iron Ore
cargoes.  On the panamax front, rates have been easing for the last few
weeks, as the expected strong grain activity in the US gulf as not yet
materialised.  The average time charter rate on capes is now in excess of
$25,000 daily and close to $11,000 on panamaxes.  The general view in the
market is that prices for both capes and panamaxes will remain strong though
to April/May 2001 by which time steel mills will have reduced raw material
imports and adversely affected cape rates and the shear number of
newbuildings on the panamax front will drag earnings down as well.  Our group
tends to believe that the balance of the year will see yet firmer rates but
we expect a slow down and a decrease in rates to take effect towards the
first two months of next year as we already are seeing some owners
desperately seeking to cover themselves for next year at very aggressive
numbers ( Hadeed contract ) and we are getting the feeling that Bocimar is
keenly interested to cover their long position even tough their length is
mainly through March/April next year.  Furthernore, the asian owners seem
more and more agressive with rates for next year as their countries are
hitting some rough patches currently, as evidenced by their stock markets and
strong comments against continued strong crude oil prices.

On the ABC front, it appears as if Zodiac and P&O have agreed in principal to
a deal by which Zodiac buys 50% of ABC but gets full control of the company.
Details are still patchy and we are keeping a close eye on the possibility of
Zodiac putting their newly acquired vessels into the Bocimar pool as that
would have a drastic bullish effect on rates for some months to come.  We
have proposed to Bocimar a 5 year collar deal by which we get access to 5
million tons of freight each year with ability to settle the collar deal
against an index and have the ability to call upon physical tonnage each
year.  Furthermore, we would have ability to have a washout clause for each
year by which we would pay a fix lump sum cash amount.   We have also built
in several other options and we are waiting for an answer from Bocimar
sometime next week.  This deal would offer us access to modern vessels at a
price similar to that of the cape index of the last 10 years and with enough
built in options to take advantage of any sudden market changes.

On the logistics front, Coeclerici is coming in next week to make a
presentation on their port handling operations in India/ Indonesia and
Venezuela with the idea of teaming up with us on forthcoming tenders where we
would offer the long term coal contracts into or out of certain ports, as the
case maybe, and they would build and manage the port operations.  They
currently have some interesting contracts in Indonesian ports which should
have special interest to us vis a vis CLP.

Our two cape deals with Coeclerici are still not finalised as we are still
having a few issues with credit language but expect the deals to close within
the next 10 days.

On the EOL front, Andy James has been able to get EDFtrading to trade 225,000
tons of freight via EOL this week and he has added Louis Dreyfus grain and
Billiton and RWE trading to the list of customers that have trading authority
on our system.

Regarding the lighter side of business, Enron dry bulk shipping was featured
in tradewinds, a weekly shipping  newspaper, with 3 pages dedicated to our
rapid growth and clever insights.

Market
	Short term	Medium term	Long Term
Handy Max	Up	Flat	Flat
Panamax	Flat	Down	Down
Cape Size	Up	Up	Flat

Deals Done
Physical Freight
ECS freight
Fixed a panamax for early December loading from Puerto Drummond to LBT

Third parties freight deals
Still negotiating a 6 panamax deal with EDF trading from Richards Bay to Le
Havre for all of next year and looking to sell freight to Preag from KPC to
Rotterdam for similar period.

OTC
FFA s
Very active week in which we transacted with Coeclerici on both Capes and
Panamaxes routes and traded with Jinhui and Conagra on Panaamxes as well.

EOL
Traded 225,000 tons with EDF Trading

Travels
All three of us should be in all week


Dear Sally,

Hope you had a good trip to Dallas, although it was a bit interrupted with
you trip back to Houston for Meagan's Open House.  Dad and I would like be
with you all on Friday the 20th of October.  I believe that may have been the
game we attended last year too.  We have meetings, the other two dates, so if
that still works for you we will plan on that date.  It also gives Dad a bit
more time to hopefully get his voice.  He returns to "DR" Bob Raley, week
after next for the results of all the testing he did this week.

Glad you will be over on Tuesday-we will look forward to seeing you then and
glad you will have time for a visit after lunch tool.

Love,

Sue


ETS  103
PGG  28
EREC 53.2
Azurix (not including Marlin) (5.2)
Clean Fuels (21.1)  I need to double check this one this morning.

We talked about EGAS yesterday.  Its their 2nd CE plus ( in this case minus) the assets we have picked up.  We will review updated 4Q with Stan on Tuesday afternoon.

I will have to check with EEOS unless you already have.

Sorry for the delay, I had to talk to Rod.


Please find attached the Global Markets Monitor for the week ending 20 July 2001.

Thank you,
Maureen Raymond-Castaneda
and Gwyn Koepke


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000 09:36
AM ---------------------------

Steven M Elliott
11/03/2000 08:26 AM
To: Stuart Bland/LON/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Adam Metry/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: styrene (baytank)

I just accepted approx. $250,000.00 settlement from the insurance company to
cover part of our losses and expenses from the Styrene contamination.  I have
been assured by the insurance company that this settlement will not hamper
Enron in going after Baytank for additional funds.

Once I receive the paperwork on the settlement I will forward it on to
Richard Sanders here at Enron.  The Insurance company has recommended a joint
lawsuit to try and collect the remaining lost funds.  The insurance company
will go after Baytank for the $250,000.00 as soon as possible.

We will still have roughly $500,000.00 on the books from last year.


Yes.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Elizabeth Sager
	05/29/2001 11:46 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Conference Call for Collateral Annex Group

Carol

Can you sit in on this call with me ?   Thanks
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 11:46 AM -----

	"Andy Katz" <AKatz@eei.org>
	05/29/2001 11:31 AM

		 To: <louv@acespower.com>, <fhilton@aep.com>, <lrgroff@aep.com>,
<Christine_Schwab@dom.com>, <Francine_Mathews@dom.com>,
<rsbaker@duke-energy.com>, <pjpa@dynegy.com>, <mtwilliams@edisonmission.com>,
<RReyna@energyusa.com>, <Tracy.Ngo@enron.com>, <ed.zabrocki@msdw.com>,
<william.mccoy@msdw.com>, <daniel.sarti@neg.pge.com>,
<Jeremy.Weinstein@pacificorp.com>, <kabedin@powersrc.com>,
<Shari_Stack@reliantenergy.com>, <cward@utilicorp.com>,
<mcrocker@utilicorp.com>, <pharrod@utilicorp.com>, <william.dudley@xemkt.com>
		 cc: <martyjo.rogers@axiaenergy.com>, <hemu@dynegy.com>,
<elizabeth.sager@enron.com>, <jcrespo@hess.com>, <wfhenze@jonesday.com>,
<dperlman@powersrc.com>, <rosteen@powersrc.com>, <drusso@reliantenergy.com>,
<babak.pooya@southernenergy.com>
		 Subject: Conference Call for Collateral Annex Group

Since I will be traveling on Friday - we had to change the conference call on
Thursday 2pm EST...If you are able to participate, please call
1-800-.860-2442  In addition, based on responses received regarding
availability to date, we are tentatively planning to have the working group
meeting in Houston during the week of July 23rd.

Andrew S. Katz, Director Industry Legal Affairs
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004
Voice:  202-508-5616
Fax:     202-508-5673
e-mail:  akatz@eei.org
 - TEXT.htm
 - Andy Katz.vcf


Can we overnight them?  and are you sending them to Art?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 11:45 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE:

Last week was crazy.  Sorry about this.  I will send them out today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:28 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE:

Gerald,

Have we sent or received these executed contracts?

kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 8:41 AM
To:	'"Avalos, Art" <AAVALOS@pnm.com>@ENRON'
Cc:	Fuller, Dave; Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE:

I am fine with the language.  We will prepare executables.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Avalos, Art" <AAVALOS@pnm.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE:

Gerald, I spoke with our lawyer Robert Clark and the following
is his additions to your language.  Please let me know if it
is acceptable. If so, please prepare executables and forward
for signatures.
Thanks  Art Avalos
"Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this Section
4.4 shall only allow for offset, set off, or recoupment between Company
and Customer, but not between Company and Customer's PNM Gas Services division."
-----Original Message-----
From: Nemec, Gerald [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Gerald.Nemec@ENRON.com >> ]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:19 PM
To: aavalos@pnm.com
Cc: Perlingiere, Debra; Fuller, Dave; Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:
Art,  Per our phone conversation, attached is the revised language for
Section 4.4 of the Master Firm Agreement.  Please review and if
acceptable, we will prepare executables and forward for signature.
"Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this Section
4.4 shall only allow for offset, set off, or recoupment between Company
and Customer, excluding Customer's PNM Gas Services division."
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


See attached summary of 1/8 meeting with Dennis Thompson, Don Hollingsworth's
Special Projects Director.


The league is complete.  Please check your fees on the website and send me a
check for what you owe.

Here are the final standings and payouts (based on what I have collected):

1) The Wranglers - $281
2) Rounders -           $108
3) PLOVE -                $43
                                     $432

The amounts above will change as people pay their fees.

My address is
2512 Milam St. #5216
Houston, TX 77006

If you won $ please give me your address and I will send you a check!

Thanks,

The Commish


Start Date: 2/23/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022314.txt


As regards to US Physical Power, I agree.

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001 10:37 AM -----

	Rhonda L Denton
	01/22/2001 10:34 AM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit Response 1/19/01

No changes to profile today.

From: Karen Lambert on 01/22/2001 10:23 AM
To: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Allan/LON/ECT@ECT, Amelia
Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts
and Facilities, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cyndie
Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Molly Lafuze/Enron
Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON, Molly.Lafuze@enron.net, Alexia
Gonzales/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Furter/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Wells/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Schultz/NA/Enron@ENRON, cbalfou@enron.com, Laurie
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cheryl
Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina LaVallee/CAL/ECT@ECT, James Scully/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Elledge/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda K Loukanis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matilda
Machado/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgi
Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON, Diana Andel/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Response 1/19/01

EnronOnline.com
01/19/2001
Amended Credit Responses Released by Credit -- no new online counterparties
to review
Please complete both contract tabs on the Credit Response by 3:00 p.m. CST
today, if possible.
The document is located in our subdirectory O:\EOL\GLOBAL_EOL and titled
011901 with Ks.xls.


We are pleased to announce that Sally Beck has been named Chief Operating Officer for Enron Net Works.  She will join Greg Piper, President and Chief Executive Officer and Mark Pickering, Chief Technology Officer in the Enron Net Works Office of the Chair.

In her current role as Managing Director for Enron Net Works, Sally heads up Enron's Global Risk Management Operations.

Ms. Beck brings more than 20 years professional experience to Enron, joining the Company in 1992.  She graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a B.B.A. in Marketing and an MBA with a concentration in Finance.

Please join us in congratulating Sally on her new role.


Q1) Are you going to be setting up an HPLC-FT-Waha ?

Q2) Roll up issues for positions

Does Tom want this part of the Market Area position - or separate from Market
Area?

Current
CPR  SITARA PORTFOLIO
N/A  Texas Position - Combined Region HLPC-IM HPLC, HPLC-IM Wellhead, HPLR-IM
Texas, ENA - IM Texas
TEXAS  Texas Position - ENA/HPLR  HPLR-IM Texas, ENA - IM Texas
HPLC   Texas Position - ENA - IM Texas ENA - IM Texas
HPLCWELL  Texas Position - HPLC-IM Wellhead HPLC-IM Wellhead
N/A  Texas Position - HPLR-IM Texas HPLR-IM Texas
TEXAS/HPLC Texas Position - Market Area Position HLPC-IM HPLC, HPLR-IM Texas,
ENA - IM Texas

Proposed additions or changes -

WAHA   Texas Position - HPLC-IM Waha  HPLC-IM Waha
TEXASREG Texas Position - Combined Region HLPC-IM HPLC, HPLC-IM Wellhead,
HPLR-IM Texas, ENA - IM Texas, HPLC-IM Waha

Rename TEXAS/HPLC in CPR to TEXASMKT - // need to know if this includes
HPLC-IM Waha - or should this be separate from Market Area

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 12:27
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           05/30/2000 11:50 AM

To: Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Intramonth Book

Please send me all forms/requests that need to be filled out to set up a new
Intramonth book for the Texas Desk.  Also, what do you think the timeline is
for getting the new book set up?

Dave


Did you park at the lot where I normally park?  If so, do you want me to meet
you there?


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000 01:47 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           12/15/99 07:25 PM

To: Shirley Elliott <shelliott@dttus.com>
cc:
Subject: Re:


Start Accepting Credit Cards Today!
[IMAGE]
 Your business MUST be accepting Credit Cards from your customers!
Over 97% of all sales on the Internet are done with Credit Cards.
Over 92% of mail orders and telephone-orders are done with Credit Cards.
If you don't take Credit Cards, 9 out of every 10 potential customers can't do business with you!
We specialize in on-line businesses, mail order and telephone order businesses, start-ups, in-home businesses as well as retail locations.
* In other words, we specialize in YOUR business *

Simply  fill out this short application and  a representative will contact you shortly.    Applicant  Information First Name:    Last Name:    Email  Address:    Business  Phone:    Home  Phone:     Please  place comments here


---------------------- Forwarded by Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/06/2001 01:50 PM ---------------------------

"Michael Kurman" <KurmanM@arentfox.com> on 07/06/2000 11:26:31 AM
To: <DRogers2@ei.enron.com>, <nancy.corbet@enron.com>,
<Paul.E.Parrish@enron.com>, <Todd.Peterson@Enron.com>
cc: "Sumanto Basu" <BasuS@arentfox.com>, "Eugene A. Massey"
<MasseyE@arentfox.com>

Subject: EcoElectrica  Conditions of Use

Per Gene Massey's request following up this morning's telephone conversation
with Dan, I attach a discussion draft of a matrix summarizing the coverage
(as to risks/obligations/liabilities) of the draft Conditions of Use in
relation to coverage under law in the absence of the Conditions of Use
document.  We understand that this matrix will be the basis of a telephone
discussion on these issues.

 - COU-Matrix7.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 06:14 PM
---------------------------

"Daigh, John" <JDaigh@utilicorp.com> on 10/19/2000 09:43:45 AM
To: "'Don.Miller@enron.com'" <Don.Miller@enron.com>
cc: "Frantz, Rick" <RFrantz@utilicorp.com>
Subject: RE: Aquila Question 10.19.00

Don, to be more specific....
1) Are the units started in parallel or sequence? (Could you please provide
a diagram of the ramp-up sequence to include timing)
2) How much start up power is required?
3) Is start up power purchased from Cinergy &/or IPL?  At what tariff rate?
4) How many Mwh are produced during start up? (May include as part of #1)
5) How much fuel is burned (MMBTU's) during start up?(May include as part of
#1)

Thanks for your help Don.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Daigh, John
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 8:49 AM
To: 'Don.Miller@enron.com'
Cc: Frantz, Rick
Subject: Aquila Question 10.19.00

Can all four units at Wheatland be started simultaneously?


Attached please find a rough draft of the Letter of Understanding for Project
20/20.  Please call with any comments.
----- Forwarded by Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 01:26 PM -----

	"HAL HALTOM" <HALTH@andrews-kurth.com>
	07/18/2000 12:11 PM

		 To: <shonnie.daniel@enron.com>
		 cc: "Melinda Brunger" <BRUNM@andrews-kurth.com>, "Roger Rippy"
<RIPPR@andrews-kurth.com>, "ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>
		 Subject: Letter of Understanding

  Attached for your review is a first draft of a letter of understanding for
the proposed sale of certain limited liability company membership interests
to Northern Border.

Please call me with your comments to this draft.

Thanks,  Hal.

 - Letterof.DOC


US Court Denies Enron, MAPP Utils Appeals Against FERC

Jun. 20, 2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

CHICAGO -(Dow Jones)- A United States Appeals Court has rejected bids from
several central U.S. utilities and power marketer Enron Corp. (ENE) to change
a series of refunds previously ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission. FERC ordered in 1999 that several transmission-owning utilities
in the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool transmission grid region had to refund
some extra transmission fees that were collected between spring 1997 and
spring 1999. In total, MAPP calculates those refunds at about $26 million.

Many MAPP companies, including Alliant Energy Corp. (LNT) and Nebraska Public
Power District, argued to the U.S. District Court of Appeals in Washington
D.C. that FERC's order violated rules against retroactive rulemaking. Enron,
which benefited from the refunds, argued in a separate appeal that it should
be paid additional compensation.

In an opinion filed Tuesday by Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson, FERC's
original rulings were backed and both appeals were rejected.

"We were disappointed by the decision," said Dan Presser, spokesman for
Alliant, which refunded $3.3 million in 1999. "Our argument was that we
should have had our refund refunded. We're still reviewing what our next step
is."


Great News, Guys!  Ron gave us his floor seats for the Phoenix game on
Wednesday, December 26 (7:30 PM).  Please let me know if you can make
the game.

See ya,
- Bub


As discussed:

What happens to my wages/salary if the Company files for bankruptcy
protection?

The general rule is that a company that has filed a banruptcy petition is
not able to make payments on any prepetition debts until a plan of
reorganization is filed.

However, there are certain exceptions to the general rule.

Claims related to wages and salary earned within 180 days of a bankruptcy
petition filing (called "prepetition wages and salaries") receive a special
priority for upt to $4650 under the bankruptcy code (section 507(a)(3)) and
are usually paid in full as part of the plan of reorganization.  Most
companies that intend to continue operating while in bankruptcy recognize
the need to keep employees working and the potential hardship that would
occur of wages were not paid or delayed.  As a result, most companies that
file a bankruptcy petition, but which inetend to remain in business, seek
the specific authority of the bankruptcy court to make payments on the
priority wage claims immediately so that employees will experience little
or no disruption in their wage/salary payments while they continue working.
Usually this authority is sought at the same time or shortly after a
bankruptcy petition is filed.  For a company that derives a great deal of
its value from its employees, making sure these payments are made in a
timely manner is a high priority.

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (212-310-8000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


liar

Danielle Samson <DanielleS@JonesGranger.com> on 04/27/2000 03:39:30 AM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Corruption Test

34

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 5:04 PM
  To: DanielleS@JonesGranger.com
  Subject: RE: Corruption Test

  55 - how about you?


What is going on man?  Any more news on the dilemma we discussed a few weeks
ago?  Just curios.  Hope things are going good for you.
PL
1-800-97- ENRON Ext 3-7376


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 01:22 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 01:20 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
mpalmer@enron.com, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: PUC DRAFT Decision

Here's a copy of the draft.

 - CPUC01-#86861-v1-A0011038_et_al__Minkin_Agenda_Dec___.doc


===================================================
Need help gaining an investing edge?
Chicago Board Options Exchange recommends options trading.
Learn how options trading can benefit your portfolio.
Go now: http://www.cboe.com/options_trading101
===================================================

Recommend emails are a powerful way to get investment tips as they happen
from the ClearStation community. If you would like to UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
http://www.clearstation.com/doc/unsub_kensey.html

*NOTE : DO NOT reply to this email. Replies should be made within 'Discuss'
at the url given below.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
'kensey' has removed RDY (Doink) at Oct 23 2001  7:47AM

DR. Reddy'S Labs Ads ( NYSE : RDY )
Symbol       Last     Time     Change     High      Low     Volume
-----        ----     ----      -----     ----      ---      -----
RDY         21.50   4:09PM       0.00    21.62    20.70          0

Community Take
--------------
7 Long / 2 Short

'kensey' said:
Tue Oct 23 07:44:55 2001

support forming apparently near 19.  or, re-enter short below 19 or at or near stochastic overbought.

recommended RDY Short on Sep 5 2001 when it was trading at 23 51/64. Since then it's gone down 9.66% to 21 1/2.

kensey
See the annotated graph of this recommendation at:

http://www.clearstation.com/cgi-bin/bbs?Cmd=post&post_id=2652634
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Recommend emails are a powerful way to get investment tips as they happen
from the ClearStation community. If you would like to UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
http://www.clearstation.com/doc/unsub_kensey.html

ClearStation is not an investment advisory service,
nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and
does not purport to tell or suggest which securities
members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should
always check with their licensed financial advisor
and their tax advisor to determine the suitability of
any investment.
ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE
Securities, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank. E*TRADE Securities,
Inc. and E*TRADE Bank are wholly-owned subsidiaries of
E*TRADE Group, Inc. E*TRADE Bank deposits are insured up
to $100,000 by the FDIC. E*TRADE Bank and E*TRADE
Securities, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.
E*TRADE brokerage accounts are maintained by E*TRADE
Securities, Inc. Products offered by E*TRADE Securities,
Inc. are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or
obligations of E*TRADE Bank, are subject to investment
risk, including possible loss of principal invested.
ClearStation is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc.
E*TRADE is a registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities,
Inc. Member NASD/SIPC.
Copyright (c) 2000. ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved.


Tana et al:  This list indicates the agreements that I have as relating to
the Offline Project.

 I thought we had come to an agreement with Sun Microsystems, Inc.
(separately from iPlanet)  Let me know if anyone has an executed version.

I'm not sure AfricaOne and Ejasent are Offline agreements.  Stephanie and
Mark , let me know.

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com


Henry,  I will resend a copy of the PPA.

"Henry Binder" <hbinder@porterhedges.com> on 03/22/2000 12:05:27 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Gallup Docs.

Gerald,

Please use hbinder instead of hbender in any e-mails you send to me.
Concerning the PPA, I did receive it but there was a line missing in the
middle of each page--looks like a copier problem.

Henry Binder

>>> "Gerald Nemec" <Gerald.Nemec@ect.enron.com> 03/22/00 11:20AM >>>

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000 11:19
AM
---------------------------

Gerald Nemec
03/22/2000 11:05 AM

To:   pmelcher@aol.com, kevin.howard@gcm.com, hbender@porterhedges.com,
      hbrown@bracepatt.com
cc:   Mark Knippa, Stephanie Balette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Davis Thames/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nora
      Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cris Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett
      Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Scarborough/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Gallup Docs.

Attached for your review in the Gallup Transaction are the following
documents:

     1.  Assignment and Contribution Agreement - Assignment operational
documents and rights in assets from ECS into the LLC

     2.  Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Agreement -  Defines
relationship between ECS and Enron Engineering and Construction        Company
for installation of the motor driver at Gallup.  This document will be
assigned
into the LLC except for that portion which relates to the electric power
transmission line.  The utility will take ownership of the transmission line
per
the power purchase agreement.

Also forwarded via hard copy yesterday, was the executed Power Purchase
Agreement.  Please let me know if you have not received this yet.

I will shortly email the form of gas purchase agreement between the LLC and
ECS.
This will merely be a new Confirm (Transaction Agreement "C") which will
operate
under the existing Enfolio Master Firm Purchase Agreement between ECS and the
LLC which was created for Kachina.

(See attached file: Contribution Agreement2.DOC)(See attached file: Gallup
Construction1.doc)


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000 03:10
PM ---------------------------

Jeff_L._Huston@dom.com on 09/29/2000 01:28:56 PM
To: Chris.Germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re:

Chris -

Do you know the status of the VNG October 2000 confirm sheet that I am
supposed
to sign?


The Win2k Project Team is currently looking for qualified individuals to
assist us in testing applications for Windows 2000. These individuals called
Subject Matter Experts, or SMEs will be needed to ensure certain applications
are running  Properly under Win2k.  Below is the application group you are
listed under.  If you are familiar with these applications and would be
willing to help out, or if you would like to designate some one in your
group, please reply by calling the SME hotline at x30333.

Thanks you,
Erica Fields

Application: AutoFax Form


Here are the weekends picks.
Good Luck All.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041820.txt


I've spoken with Shanna this morning about Rob Fuller, and my need to keep him here for the next couple of months.  She relayed to me that it would be appropriate now to let him know of a gauranteed payment of $200,000 to him if he is here Feb 4, as long as he was performing to a satisfactory level.

He is probably one of two or three that I need to do this with ( the others less pressing), and I will be communicating with Rob today about this.

Thanks

Jeff


These volumes reflect Cal-ISO cuts. Fun!


These deals are entered with SP delivery point and firm energy type.

Thanks!

560021
560662


except for Chris Simms of course . . .

http://ww3.sportsline.com/b/page/pressbox/0,1328,3476276,00.html


Looks like what I thought was happening is happening. Give me a call.

Chris


Mark:  I know you'll eventually get to this message in the near future.
Based on the VOLUME of activity, I would like to have a printer in my office
if at all possible.  Thanks.  Sara


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Weather Group
On Wednesday, December 6th, The Weather Channel aired an episode of their
show "Atmospheres," which included a fifteen minute segment focusing on
Enron's Weather Risk Management business.  Mark Tawney, Steven Vu, Gary
Taylor, and Steve Bennett were featured.  The Weather Channel has aired the
episode periodically since then.  The parts that make it through the Enron
cutting room floor will be coming soon to an elevator near you!  If you would
like to view a copy of the episode in its entirety, please contact Yvette
Simpson at ext. 3-9595.

The Weather Risk Management group completed the first ever Power Demand
transaction this week.  The transaction was a swap based on the PJM demand
index.  Power Demand contracts use average peak power demand as an index and
allow power market participants (generators, btu distributors, marketers,
etc...) to mitigate volumetric exposures.  Weekly swaps are available on
EnronOnline and the desk has placed option contracts on this index in the
broker market.  Inquiries regarding this product should be directed to
Claudio Ribeiro, product manager ext. 3-7313, Gary Taylor ext. 3-1511, or
Valter Stoiani ext. 3-6906.

West Power Trading
It,s been a wild and crazy holiday season in the West.  Electricity prices
have remained extremely bullish throughout the entire WSCC, due in large part
to below-normal temperatures, &less than stellar8 river flows in the
Northwest and Northern California, tremendously volatile natural gas prices,
and a number of generating plants down for both planned and unplanned
maintenance.  Recently, the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission (FERC) has
stepped in to implement several orders in an effort to try to correct this
&extremely flawed market.8  Stay tuned sports fans; some have the feeling
that the best is yet to come.

HAPPY HOLIDAYS
Seasons Greetings from ENA PR.  The EnTouch newsletter will be on holiday
break next week.  If you have information for future issues of EnTouch,
please send it to Michelle Vitrella.  We hope you have a wonderful and safe
holiday.  See you next year!

WELCOME

New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Kimberly Hardy, Adam Johnson, Daniel Lisk, William Fleenor, Stacey
Wales, Jason Fischer, Aparna Rajaram

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


Mtr 1600- A deal already exists for this meter (#159194).  If you view the
meter in MOPS you can see the deal.  (It had zero volume before today.)

Mtr 6725 - This gas is traded on the spot market, so there is no deal to put
in.

D

Jackie Young
04/06/2000 10:15 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 98-1600 & 98-6725 Needing K's

Daren,

I hate to be a pest but here's the deal on the above two meters:

98-1600  Sitara deal #159194 expired on 2/29/2000.  The flow for 2/2000 was
on the 215K.  This meter (del.) flowed 53.863 for 3/2000.  There is no   new
deal referenced, nor is the evergreen flag in effect.

98-6725  Sitara deal #214948 expired 3/27/2000.  No evergreen and no new deal
referenced.  This is a little premature but this meter is active   monthly
and I'm thinking that it will flow for this month with no K being applied.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


Dear Mark Taylor,

Thank you for ordering from crateandbarrel.com on November 26, 2001.  We
will begin processing your order.

Please keep this e-mail as a record of your order.

Your order(s) will be billed to:
Mark Taylor
1322 Rutland
Houston, TX 77008

Order 2011219 will be shipped to:

Mark Taylor
1322 Rutland
Houston, TX 77008

1 Punch Bowl Party Time Set/8pc. (SKU: 508187)  $79.95
6 Party Time Punch Cup 7oz. (SKU: 491438)  $35.70

Merchandise Total: $115.65
Tax: $8.26
Gift Box Total: $0.00
Shipping Method: Standard
(for all non-basic freight items)

You can track this order online at
http://www.crateandbarrel.com/track.asp?o=2011219&z=77008
(If you cannot click through this link, please copy and paste the entire
URL into your browser's address window.) UPS and U.S. Postal Service
receive order numbers and tracking numbers from Crate and Barrel at the
close of business Monday through Friday.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Complete Merchandise Total: $115.65
Tax: $8.26
Gift Box Total: $0.00
Shipping and Handling: $16.45

Final Total: $140.36

------------------------------------------------------------------

If you have any questions regarding your order, please contact Crate and
Barrel Customer Service via e-mail at
http://www.crateandbarrel.com/customer/default.asp or call us at
800-967-6696, 7:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. Monday through Sunday (CT).

Thank you for shopping with us. We hope you'll visit us again soon at
http://www.crateandbarrel.com.

Crate and Barrel
Customer Service
INT:1044901


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 05/30/2001
12:18 PM ---------------------------

Peter Styles@ECT
05/30/2001 09:27 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Nailia Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: EURELECTRIC Conclusions on the Ca lifornia Electricity Sector Crisis

Here's the one pager.

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 05/30/2001 03:17
PM ---------------------------

odilleen@eurelectric.org on 04/19/2001 03:45:24 PM
To: DL214_Email@eurelectric.org, DL218_Email@eurelectric.org
cc:

Subject: EURELECTRIC Press Release on the Report and Conclusions on the Ca
lifornia Electricity Sector Crisis

>  <<Calif EN.pdf>>
Dear members and colleagues,

> Please find herewith the latest EURELECTRIC Press Release on the Report
> and Conclusions on the California Electricity Sector Crisis
>
> I am of course available for any questions.
>
> Best regards
> Chris Boothby
> Communication Manager
> Union of the Electricity Industry - EURELECTRIC
>
> ***********************************************
> P P
> Oonagh Dilleen
> Communications Assistant
> Union of the Electricity Industry - EURELECTRIC
> 66, Bld de l'Imp,ratrice
> 1000 Bruxelles
> www.eurelectric.org
>
> Tel : +32 - (0)2 - 515.10.33
> Fax : +32 - (0)2 - 515.10.10
>
 - Calif EN.pdf

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 05/30/2001
12:18 PM ---------------------------

Peter Styles@ECT
05/30/2001 09:52 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Paul Dawson/Govt. Affairs/LON/ECT, Brendan Devlin/EU/Enron@Enron, Nailia
Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT, Fiona Grant/LON/ECT, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT, Alfredo
Huertas/LON/ECT, Teun Van Biert/LON/ECT, Doug Wood/LON/ECT, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Steve Kean's speech on California, Madrid 12/6; EURELECTRIC mission
to the USA: Report

Rick: Here's the "draft" Eurelectric report (never saw final, but don't think
it's materially different.)

Would be good if whoever is updating Jim Steffes slides from 29/3 could take
a steer from the issues the report concentrates on, and either endorse/
explain them, or rebut/ disentangle them. Also we should bear in mind theme
of Madrid conferenc is convergence of power and gas markets/ regulation, so
gas market aspects for Western Area will be of partic. interest. Items to
de-emphasise in very short slot available may be workings of PX and NOx
credits trading.

For potential lessons of relevance to Europe, I think Steve should
concentrate on dangers in: decoupling of wholesale and retail market,
attempted upfront guaranteed benefits to smaller consumers, and absence of
adequate demand side, and generation investment, signals.

Alfredo, Teun, Paul and Paul: As mentioned in staff meeting yesterday, would
appreciate your one or two slides each of bullet points on lessons for/
reassurance of irrelevance to (as the case may be!) your markets by end this
week. Steve is away, so Rick and I will take a look at pulling this together
intitially.

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 05/30/2001 03:18
PM ---------------------------

"Sandra James" <Sandra_James@electricity.org.uk> on 04/10/2001 05:15:33 PM
To: <Nailia.Dindarova@enron.com>, <Peter.Styles@enron.com>,

Subject: Fwd: EURELECTRIC mission to the USA : Report

Please see attached a report by EURELECTRIC on their recent study visit to
California.

>  <<Report USA.pdf>>

 - Report USA.pdf

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 05/30/2001
12:18 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
05/30/2001 12:10 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Eurelectric Presentation

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 05/30/2001
12:10 PM ---------------------------

Katrina Burton
05/30/2001 10:40 AM
Sent by: Katrina Burton
To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Eurelectric Presentation

Sorry for the delay on getting this to you, Maureen.

Katrina Burton
ext. 5-4498


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
03:35 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
12/01/2000 02:44 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: WTI maket maker simulation model

John,

We finished the Version 2 of the simulation model which deals with the
open-close trading versus the continuous trading in the previous version.

I added the cummulative P/L as an output.   There are a few apparent trading
strategies from this model:

1) Higher bid/offer spread, more profit
2) More Daily # of trades, more profit
3) Smaller net open positions allowed, more profit

1) and 2) are obvious, but 3) is more interesting.  It means that we are
better off
if we do not allowed net open positions at end of the day.  In a trending
market,
this makes an intuitive sense, for example, in the case of bull market we are
short as a market maker and we can avoid the loss at the higher openning price
by keeping zero or small net short positions.

I have attached the model with this mail, and I'll  be happy to discuss the
model
in more details with you.

Zimin


----- Original Message -----
From: <JOMcRae@aol.com>
To: <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: Golf

> I'll be there...now what exit off SW Fwy. is Fort Bend C.C.?  I don't know
> that neck of the woods real well...
> I have just come from Mexico in search of unofficial absentee ballots of
> Florida, undervotes and over votes and slight votes and not so slight
votes!
> While my task is analogous to the search for the Holy Grail, truth,
justice
> and the Tipper-way have propelled me!  So far, Bush leads even after our
> exhaustive search, which means of course that we must keep looking...we
don't
> stop till that number is ours!
> Have you guys seen any missing ballots in Fort bend County?  If you find
any
> e-mail algore@witsend.com or www.democraticSocialistsUnited@org.com
> Communists everywhere thank you for your help.
> Question:  Is this media coverage equal to our below that of the O.J.
Simpson
> trial?  How about Princess Diana's funeral?
> I promise another topic tomorrow!  Please oblige!
> Sweet dreams, you princes of Sugarland!
> JIM


Requested form of GTC Confirmations attached:

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
03:10 PM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 09/26/2000 02:58 PM
To: Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Canadian Sample forms of ISDA Agreements & Confirmations

Chris,

Per our conversation, I am attaching  a sample form of ISDA for both a
Canadian corporate and a Canadian governmental.  With the governmental, the
proposed form of legal opinion attached to the ISDA Schedule would have to be
modified depending on your particular situtation (see footnotes in opinion).
As I also mentioned, we are making some revisions to the guaranty we are
getting from Hydro-Quebec in response to comments from counsel, and we may
want to make some of the same changes to guarantees we receive from any
governmental guarantor.  If you end up having a governmental guarantor, let
me know and I'll send you down the revisions.

By copy of this email to Joe Hunter on the Confirmation Desk, I am asking him
to email you copies of the form of Omnibus Confirmation and Annex A thereto
for an ECC/Canadian Counterparty Deal.  I have to say that if you end up
transacting with a governmental entity, our form of confirmation will not
include the reps and warranties required to transact with such
counterparties, since we never trade financial with governmentals prior to
execution of a master.  If you go down that road we may have to come up with
some kind of form, but the best route is to get the ISDA in place first.


Kristin,

Thank you for the California update.  Please continue to include me in all
further intellegence reports regarding the situation in California.

Phillip


MRyanTaber@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Solicitation of Credentials from Candidates
   for the position of Vice-Chairperson of the NYISO Operating Committee
          for a one-year term from December 2001 ? November 2002

     The Nominating Committee of the NYISO Operating Committee is seeking
qualified individuals willing to serve as Vice-Chairperson of the
Committee.
     The scope of responsibilities of the Operating Committee can be found
in Article 8 of the ISO Agreement.  As specified in the Agreement, the
Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson will serve a one-year term, and the
Vice-Chairperson will become the Chairperson following the completion of
the Chairperson's term.  The Agreement further specifies that the
individuals elected to these positions may not be active in the same sector
as the Chair of their Committee, nor may they be representatives of members
that occupy the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson positions of the Business
Issues Committee or Management Committee.
     These provisions, at this time, preclude representatives of the
following companies or their affiliates and representatives from the
following sector from consideration for Vice-Chairperson for the upcoming
term:
?    Transmission Owners
?    Niagara Mohawk
?    Con Ed Solutions
?    New York Power Authority

     The Nominating Committee will review the credentials of the presenting
candidates and may screen the pool.  However, the Nominating Committee is
required (pursuant to the OC By-Laws) to bring at least  one qualified
candidate before the Operating Committee for election.
     Therefore, the Nominating Committee requests that interested
individuals, who are not representatives of the members or sectors listed
above, to present the following material by 5:00 pm, October 4, 2001.

?    A current resume
?    Brief answers to the following questions:
1.   Please describe all experience you have had in chairing groups or
committees of diverse interests, with a list of such groups.
2.   Please describe the support of your organization for your assuming the
position of Vice-Chairperson, and describe your ability to make the
necessary time commitment.
3.   Please describe any training or experience you have had in mediation,
ADR or consensus building.
4.   Please describe briefly why you would like to have this job.
5.   Please describe briefly your organizations actual and/or potential
business interests in the Northeast and New York State, including the
sector in which your organization participates for purposes of NYISO
governance.

Please send this information by electronic mail to:
     Mollie Lampi, NYISO, (tel) 518-356-7530, (e-mail) mlampi@nyiso.com and
     Ernie Cardone,  NYISO, (tel) 518 ? 356- 6133, (email)
ecardone@nyiso.com


---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001
10:45 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           01/04/2001 10:37 AM

To: O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://www.s-a-g-e.com/


New and hopefully improved version, changing confidentiality and the
statement in the term sheet on structure.

Kay


P. Love -- What are you doing with tis fish?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	<Edmund_A_Bosse@comerica.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3CEdmund+5FA+5FBosse+40comerica+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	kevin_bosse@enron.com
Subject:	fish

----------------------------------------- (on ftp2)

uwantsomehat.1.jpg was scanned and no virus found
---------------------------------------------------------

Phillip - It looks like you're choking your chicken!!!!

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

 - uwantsomehat.1.jpg


My initial comments on the cipco rfp


Pete,

I sent change order #4 to you and Paul on November 3rd, via email.  I will
resend it if you can't find it.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 01/17/2001 09:13:15 AM
To: "Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>, "Lindo, Jacqueline
E." <jacquelinelindo@akllp.com>, "Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)"
<lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Alan.
Larsen (E-mail)" <Alan.Larsen@enron.com>, "Sheila Tweed (E-mail)"
<Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: RE: Comparison of GE Facility Agmt with Original FormAgreement.D OC

The Guaranteed Delivery Dates in Section 10.2.1 were taken from the
original agreement.  I am not aware of any change order modifying those
dates.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE) [mailto:kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Lindo, Jacqueline E.; Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
Cc: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: Comparison of GE Facility Agmt with Original
FormAgreement.D OC

I'm reviewing.  Are dates in Section 10.2.1 correct?  Lee, I'll forward
you
my comments separately.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Lindo, Jacqueline E. [mailto:jacquelinelindo@akllp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:04 PM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com; kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Cc: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: Comparison of GE Facility Agmt with Original Form Agreement.DOC

At the request of Peter Thompson, attached is the blacklines of the
GE/Facility Agreement showing changes from the Original Form Agreements
and the Execution copy.  Peter will be out of office today, therefore,
please contact Chris Cobb at (202) 662-3016 if you have any questions.

 <<Comparison of GE Facility Agmt with Original Form Agreement.DOC>>


Apologies to those who already got this from Harry.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 02:20 PM -----

	Harry Kingerski
	05/10/2001 12:31 PM

		 To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Marcus Dotson/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Rate design for 3 cent Rate increase for PGE/SCE

CORRECTION - last line, Monday, May 14

	Harry Kingerski
	05/10/2001 01:16 PM

		 To: Wanda Curry/HOU/EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES, Don
Black/HOU/EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES,
jklauber@llgm.com, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES, Marcus Dotson/HOU/EES
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Rate design for 3 cent Rate increase for PGE/SCE

2 proposed decisions were released last night by the California PUC - one by
the Judge and one by Chairman Lynch.

Direct access customers are exempt from the surcharge.
Each customer class is allocated an equal 3 cents, plus an amount to cover
the shortfall from having residential usage up to 130% of baseline exempt
from the surcharge (as required by law).  Each decision allocates a
substantial portion of the subsidy to non-residential classes, although Lynch
does this to a lesser extent
The new rates become effective June 1, and the shortfall from the actual
effective date of the increase, March 27, through June 1 will be amortized
over 12 months.
Residential rate design - 5 tiers will be put in place; the 5th tier (300+%
of baseline) gets a 35 cent per kwh rate
Non-residential rate design - recommendations to put all of the increase into
summer on-peak were rejected.  About 60% of increase put into summer.
Real Time Pricing was endorsed - will further explore in workshops starting
later in May.  Voluntary program will be started.
In a vindictive outlash, Lynch decision requires federal facilities to pay
market prices under new schedules to be developed by the utilities
Judge's decision seems to require surcharge to show up as a separate line
item; Lynch's decision requires that it not be shown separately

Oral argument occurs Friday and final decision is expected to be voted out
Monday, June 14.


PLEASE TREAT AS CONFIDENTIAL

A source had a meeting today with California state treasurer Phil Angelides.
Here are the main points from their conversation

1. Anglelides Certain that SoCal Will Go Bankrupt

Corroborating our line over the past four months, Anglelides stated with
confidence that SoCal would go bankrupt and that "he was surprised they
hadn't already."  He noted that the only reason they haven't yet is that
"they were too stupid to ring-fence the parent" and that "their two biggest
equity holders were screaming not to do it."

He added that the Davis/SoCal MOU is dead and that all the "Plan B's" are
"speculative" at best.  He also thought that SoCal was being "naive if they
thought they would get a better deal from the legislature than from the
bankruptcy court."

2. Bond Issuance- $12B Not Enough

Angelides conceded that a $12B bond issue would not be enough to buy power
for the summer and that the true costs would probably be $18-24B.   The only
reason they didn't issue more is that Angelides felt that "$12B was all the
market could handle."  The current game plan for bonds assumes an average
peak price for power of $400/MWh, which Angelides said explains the
difference between his estimates and the higher estimates from State
Comptroller's Kathleen Connell's office.

3. New Generator Construction

Anglelides was explicit that the California Public Power Authority
(authorized by the legislature last week) will "build plants and not stop
until we [California] has a 10-15% capacity cushion above expected demand.
Angelides expects the state to be "5-10% short on power all summer."


we just got that center wilkerson.  he is the best lineman in the country.


-----Original Message-----
From: jfogg@reliantenergy.com [mailto:jfogg@reliantenergy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:15 AM
Subject: REGT Capacity Report Monday Nov 26

Welcome back.   Hope everyone had a good and safe Thanksgiving.  For gas
flow for Tuesday,November 27, REGT has the following IT capacity:

CGT                                0          CGT back on line at 326
Other Hub Delivery Points including TGT     10
Tetco Bald Knob                       15           TETCO pressures have
been up and down, limiting IT.
Texas Gas Helena                      85
MRT Glendale                          15
Other Line AC points                        15
Williams Jane                         10
Carthage Delivery                     10
SBS injection space                   75
SBS withdrawal space                        50
Backhaul to west                      50

REGT is still having problems with several compressors including Malvern
#1, Ada, Round Mountain and Chandler stations.   Amber Station is flowing
295 Mdth east and Line 2 South is at 99 Mdth for today.  Be aware that REGT
is not offering any general interruptible transportation discounts from
West of Amber to east delivery points.  All IT will be priced at max rate,
unless of operational benefit to REGT.  REGT is still full along Line AD
and is approaching full levels at its Oklahoma storage facilities.

Power plants only burned about 30 to 35 Mdth/d over the past few days.  I
have not seen any Arkla report for the weekend but the weather was mild.
Look for a pickup  with the colder weather hitting the system through
Wednesday but it may be just a quick hitting front

Gas Prices     East  $1.70
          West  $1.615

 REGT Fuel - currently 1.31% plus $0.0014/dth EPC - based on above
= $0.0237/dth

I am in the office today.  You can call me at 713-207-5183 or AOL IM me at
JAFOGG for any rate quotes or questions.

Thanks

JAF


Hello Jeff,

I hope you are well.
Below is a background on our firm.  As you will see what characterizes our
candidates
is their current or recent experiences.  Many have already rolled out into
industry as well.

Hawkes-Peers & Co. is an executive search firm based in NYC, specializing in
identifying opportunities for top-tier consultants from the top strategy
firms-McKinsey,  Bain, BCG, AT Kearney, and Booz Allen, who are looking to
move into the corporate sector.  These candidates also share the common
qualification of an MBA from one of the elite business schools such as
Harvard, Wharton, Sloan, Kellogg, etc.  Our focus targets this network of
individuals on an ongoing basis, keeping an active portfolio of these
management consultants from which we can draw for appropriate opportunities.

The emergence, growth, and continued vitality of Hawkes-Peers are a direct
result of the increased demand for strategy consulting professionals
throughout the United States.  Our intent is to identify and re-position
only those professionals who will enhance and build quality organizations;
and to adhere to high professional and ethical standards that serve the best
interests of our clients and our profession.

Our extensive network can allow your organization to be highly selective and
save you invaluable time.  We can give you the ability to select amongst the
most talented strategic, operations, and management consulting
professionals; and build strength in the future of your company.

If you have an interest in the pool of talent that we represent, I would be
more than happy to provide you with more information.  Additionally, I can
send samples of our past introductions as well as resumes provided with
permission from the candidate.

Sincerely,

Georgette Semaan
Hawkes Peers & Co.
212 624-4070
Georgette@hawkespeers.com


forgot to send this last week..
hope you had a good wknd..
ca

-----Original Message-----
From: Abramo, Caroline
Sent: Wed 10/3/2001 9:14 AM
To: Gomez, Julie A.; Lagrasta, Fred
Cc:
Subject: FW: Shut In Now and Generate Cash Flow

Morning.. this was produced by our marking desk in Houston who deals with small to midsize independent E&Ps who are small and predominately unhedged

The idea originated from statements by Mark Pappa at EOG.. that EOG could possibly shut in some production at certain price levels.  It is a response to their intent NOT a suggestion.

This is not Enron's TRADING view.. we do not think there will be shut-ins the near term because:

The producers are looking to shut in at $1.75 levels.. this would have to occur for several months.. cash is currently at this level but contangos are at all time highs..Nov01 is 42 cents above this level, Dec01 is 83 cents above this level. CY02..$1.05 and CY03 $1.525!!!

so.. no one is shutting in now.  as soon as we hear of anyone doing so, we will let you know..

So from a trading perspective we still advocate being short Nov, Dec, and 1st 6 months of CY02..

Please call me with questions.. I am in Houston this week (713-853-4759) and can set up discussions with John Arnold, Julie Gomez (our fundy specialist) or Jim Schweiger our Texas storage operator.

Coming... Rockies/ Canadian shut in thoughts..

<<Shut In Now and Generate Cash Flow.pdf>>


I am not sure we are looking for anybody at this level but she maybe able to help with retail risk syndications.

Any thoughts?

Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Angela
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Bradford, William S.
Subject:	Resume of a person I worked with at American General

I do not know if you are looking for anyone right now in your group, but attached is the resume of a woman I used to work with at American General Corporation ("AGC").  She was an excellent business person.  I worked with her on private placement transactions.  One of the responsibilities of a private placement analyst at AGC was credit analysis.  If I can answer any questions about her let me know.  The only reason she is currently looking is because of the possible job losses following the acquisition of AGC by AIG.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3817
Houston, Texas 77019
Tel: (713) 345-8347
Fax: (713) 646-3393
e-mail: angela.davis@enron.com


Hi Carolyn,

GE has asked for an explanation of the relationship of Pegasus to Delta Power
(in other words, the equity structure).  Could you please ask Greg if DP can
send an email with that explanation, so that I can pass it along to GE.

Thanks,

Kay


Attached is my procedural draft to accounting on how to calculate MCF WACOG.
Let me know your comments by the close of business on May 12th.


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data
approver. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012736&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000012736
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/8/01 4:28:42 PM
Requested For       : anita.dupont@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


Regards

Karen


Vince:

   As way of introduction, I wanted to write a bit about Mars inc. and then
about CDS,
the unit I head.  Mars is a private company, considered to be the largest
privately owned
manufacturing company in the world.  Mars is not in the habit of disclosing
its
finances,
so the best I could do is refer to Forbes' estimate of $15 Billion annual
revenue and
to the profit margins of similar companies between 5-12%.  Mars is in the
business of
manufacturing confectionery (m&m, Dove bar, skittles, twix, - all (R))
food (Uncle Ben rice (R))  pet food (Pedigree, Whiskas Waltham (R)) and other
products.

Mars has prospered during the years because of a unique philosophy that
emphasizes the
long term goals of the company.  Part of the philosophy is to look for win-win
solutions with
its suppliers, customers and partners.

As can be understood from the nature of the company, a large chunk of its
expenses
goes towards purchasing commodity like products, and hence the history of
researching
those commodities and the weather that influences their supply and the demand
(people
eat less ice cream in the winter and less chocolate in the summer).

CDS has a history of few decades in forecasting  weather and has been very
successful,
with an envious track record, in helping Mars get a competitive advantage in
these arenas.
CDS is a global group (in 4 countries across two continents) which supports
the
purchasing
function and the corporate at large in these and other arenas.  It is a
multidiscipline and
multinational team with a lot to offer.

Not having a ready access to the energy markets, and with a risk profile based
on
manufacturing expertise, Mars has decided to look for potential partners in
this
area.
Enron presence in the market place certainly makes it an interesting party to
talk to.

In talking to Enron, we are careful to suggest that Mars is not committing to
anything
at this point, and all we are after is to find out if there is an interest to
pursue the opportunity
we discussed in the future.

I am looking forward to our video conference call.

Kind regards,

Avi

---------------------------------------
Avi I. Hauser  PhD MBA
CDS Director
100 International Drive Mt Olive NJ 07828-1383
+ 1 973 691 3664 (office)
+ 1 973 347 8189 (fax)
+ 1 973 727 3622 (car + slow paging)
hauser@cdsusa.com


IBM would like to distribute the attached press release on Thursday, June 8.
The draft has been reviewed and approved by EES' executive team.  Please
let me know your comments by 5pm on Wednesday, June 7.

Thanks
Peggy Mahoney (57034)


Chris,

The term ticket in TAGG is for 1500/d @ .434.  Where is the remaining volume
so that the hedge ties.

David

Chris Germany
05/25/2000 04:19 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyndie
Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Local Production for June

John, I took the volumes on deal 226556 to 0 for the term of the deal
starting June 1.  This is the purchase from Belden & Blake behind NYSEG.

I changed the volume on deal 226563 from 1 dth/day to 1500 dth/day.  This is
the purchase from StatOil at CPA.  The price on this deal is NX1 + .434 and
the price on John's worksheet is NX1 + .54 (per MCF).  John, is this price
adjusted for dth??

I created deal 280185, purchase from StatOil, volume of 333 day, the price is
NX1+ $.56 PER MCF.  This is a purchase of local production behind the
citygate.  David, this deal probably needs to be hedged in Sitara.
Cindy - deal 226563 is a purchase from CES - Statoil Energy.  I set up deal
280185 with the same counterparty.  This deal should have been in the system
effective 1/1/2000.  According to Elizabeth, we should not use the CES -
StatOil Energy.  It doesn't matter to me how its set up, however, this deal
should have been in the system from Jan and it is the same type of deal as
deal 226563.

I changed the volume on deal 226747 from 1 dth to 1100 dth/day.  This is a
purchase from Questar and it is also local production behind CPA.
John, there are 3 deals for Questar, the other 2 deals have volumes of 0
right now.  Can you tell me how the volume should be split out for pricing
purposes?

Molly, I created deal 280132, FOM priced sale to CES.  This deal will be
matched with the CPA local production deals.

Let me know if anyone has any questions.

Thanks
cg 3-4743

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 02:41
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
05/24/2000 05:26 PM
To: hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com,
jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Local Production for June

Please send this email to anyone that may need to see it.  I'm sure I left
someone out.

This is citygate gas ENA will sell to CES for June.  This will reduce the
numbers on the sheet Doug sent us yesterday.

East Ohio Gas on CNG
10,000 dth/ month from Power Gas Marketing

CPA on TCO
500 dth/day from Power Gas Marketing
1,833 dth/day from StatOil
1,100 dth/day from Questa - Note:  this is an estimated volume.  We should
know the actual volume in the next day or so.

Note:  CES is not taking any Carnagie gas at CPA.

National Fuel
250 dth/day from Belden & Blake.  The deal expires 6/30/2000.

Equitrans
All of the Equitrans is production or pool gas on the pipeline.  ENA
nominates this gas.  CES still has a citygate load of 1,280 dth/day for June
on Equitrans so the production gas will be delivered to CES.

CES will not be receiving any local production behind Peoples or NYSEG.


Their address in Cincinnati is:
Mr & Mrs. James E. Rogers
6 Noel Lane
Cincinnati, OH, 45243

Talk to you soon.
Ben


-----Original Message-----
From: webmaster@cera.com [mailto:webmaster@cera.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:01 PM
To: clients@cera.com
Subject: Western Energy--Winter Demand Peaks Not Expected to Result in
Price Spikes or Reliability Problems - CERA Monthly Briefing

Title: One Tight Winter Peak Remains
URL(s):

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2760;

***********************************************************************

WESTERN ENERGY--WINTER DEMAND PEAKS NOT EXPECTED TO RESULT IN PRICE SPIKES OR RELIABILITY PROBLEMS

Building natural gas and power supplies are providing a cushion for the western
energy markets for this winter. Although seasonal gas and power demand spikes
will again push prices higher, this winter will not look like the winter of
2000/01. Unlike during the record high gas and power prices and blackouts last
year winter, reduced demand, increased gas storage levels, and new gas and
power supplies will significantly temper prices and significantly reduce the
risk of supply disruptions.

*  A supply build of 300 million cubic feet (MMcf) per day in the Rockies and
900 MMcf in western Canada is meeting with declining demand in the West

*  Fourth quarter power demand is expected to be 13 percent below levels last
year, while over 5,000 megawatts of new supply has been added this year

*  Only severe cold weather, prolonged drought, or a supply disruption could
produce a reliability problem this winter

**end**

Follow above URL for complete CERA Monthly Briefing (10 pages).

E-mail Category: Monthly Briefing
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Western Energy

***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
CERA's Autumn 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas
are now available at http://www20.cera.com/event
***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Sally,

Over the past year or so Enron has made a great impact at the University of
Oklahoma.  In a very short time we have become one of the employers of
of choice within the College of Business.  We have been able to do this by
paying attention to details and going beyond the necessary.  We have formed
great relationships and planted seeds that will reap benefits for years to
come, if we do not become complacent.  I for one am an example of the
impression
that Enron has forged at OU.  I am here because I believe that Enron
represents one of the greatest opportunities in not only the energy industry,
but the
but the business world in general.

I am sending this note because I believe we are taking steps that will lessen
our momentum at the University of Oklahoma.   I have learned that we will
not be sponsoring any entertainment for our presentation this fall.   As you
know, last year we sponsored a hypnotist and a drama team for entertainment
after our presentations.  Being a student at the time I felt this was a great
idea and I know that my fellow students enjoyed the presentations as well.
They felt that it was a great opportunity to gain insight from Enron
representatives as well enjoy the entertainment which we provided.  As I
understand the A/A program now takes the position that this does not provide
any residual value for Enron and does not warrant the expense.  I do not
understand this reasoning and feel that there is great value in such an
arrangement.  It places another selling point on our presentation and gives
us a better opportunity to familiarize ourselves with upcoming talent.   This
may seem like an  insignificant detail,  but I hope we will see the value
that this opportunity presents.  The students of the EM Program and the J.C.
Penney Leadership Program are expecting another exciting evening from Enron
and hate to see us fall short of these expectations.  It is very likely that
if we do not sponsor this event one of our competitors will.  The competition
for talent is growing and we can not allow ourselves to become overconfident
in our recruiting efforts.  Enron is a great place to work and we must take
that image to campus.   I know that Mr. McConnell is a very exciting speaker
and will no doubt amaze those present.  That is why we should take this
simple step to have as many potential leaders present as possible and
continue our path to recruiting dominance at the University of Oklahoma.

I am fully aware that you were the instrumental element in putting OU within
Enron's sights.  Your involvement at OU is greatly appreciated and I hope you
maintain
your interest in the University of Oklahoma.  Please consider my views on
this matter and express any concerns of your own to the Analyst and Associate
Program.

Thank You,

Jody Crook


Kate, what's the status?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/05/2001 05:16 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal for Mike Swerzbin1

Yep - the trade's there all right. I just talked to Mike again and he said
he'd love to take the trade, but he's sure it's an error. To avoid any
confusion later, and because he's already left the office for today, let's
have Mike talk to his Amerex broker tomorrow morning and clear this up. He
just might get a sweet deal out of it!

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/05/2001 03:19 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal for Mike Swerzbin1

This is what amerex is showing and this is what I have confirmed.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/05/2001 04:59 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal for Mike Swerzbin1

Mike did a deal with these terms but a price of 380 - deal is #571917. But he
said a price like $292.50 doesn't sound right for Sept. - possibly May?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/05/2001 03:03 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing Deal for Mike Swerzbin1

Amerex is showing a deal on their checkout I did not verbal

Enron buys from Aquila Sept. 01 PV 25 mw peak hrs at $292.50