Markets 	 [IMAGE] 	DJ30 	 	9,834.67	 	-66.70	 	-0.67%  	 [IMAGE] 	NASDAQ 	 	1,875.05	 	-5.45  	 	-0.29%	 [IMAGE] 	S&P  500 	 	1,137.03	 	-5.63	 	-0.49%	 [IMAGE] 	US markets closed
																															[IMAGE]

 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]    Quote & 3-Point ViewProfile & FundamentalsKey RatiosAnalyst InfoEarnings EstimatesInsider TradingInteractive Graph ToolGraphs In BulkDiscussionRecommendationsNews Articles   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Portfolio Mail  My  Portfolios   Prices/Events  as of 6:30PM EST    My Portfolio  Details      Stop this Report    [IMAGE] Portfolio: 'My Stocks'  Long positions  Symbol  Position  Last  Change  %Change  Volume  Value  Today's Net          CPQ   375  9.67  0.04  0.42%  9,301,100  3,626.25  15.00  DELL   220  25.95  -0.44  -1.67%  21,253,200  5,709.00  -96.80  EMC   160  15.60  -0.51  -3.17%  16,885,700  2,496.00  -81.60  ENE   145  5.01  -1.98  -28.33%  115,632,800  726.45  -287.10  EOG   540  34.32  -0.12  -0.35%  1,652,800  18,532.80  -64.80  HD   190  46.38  0.20  0.43%  4,381,100  8,812.20  38.00  SRV   2,665  6.26  -0.12  -1.88%  271,000  16,682.90  -319.80  SUNW   210  12.46  -0.79  -5.96%  51,637,000  2,616.60  -165.90  WCOM   215  14.28  -0.20  -1.38%  11,414,500  3,070.20  -43.00  NCI   42  4.00  0.30  8.11%  160,700  168.00  12.60               'My Stocks' Total:  62,440.40  -993.40               All Total:  62,440.40  -993.40   Symbol  Events  Community Take       CPQ   Close Below the 50-day EMA  292 Long / 62 Short    Most Actives       [IMAGE] DELL   Most Actives  595 Long / 68 Short           [IMAGE] EMC   Most Actives  720 Long / 28 Short      [IMAGE] ENE   Record Price Low  177 Long / 9 Short    Most Actives      Percentage Loser       [IMAGE] EOG   Close Above the 50-day EMA  33 Long / 3 Short    Close Above the 13-day EMA       [IMAGE] HD   Most Actives  215 Long / 45 Short           [IMAGE] SUNW   Most Actives  781 Long / 49 Short    This Months Best Trends       [IMAGE] WCOM   Most Actives  530 Long / 18 Short   Events for stocks in your Watch list(s):  Symbol  Events  Community Take       HD   Most Actives  215 Long / 45 Short           [IMAGE] WMT   Most Actives  222 Long / 27 Short           [IMAGE] CLRS   Close Above the 50-day EMA  49 Long / 3 Short      [IMAGE] For help  with ClearStation's Portfolio Manager, or to learn more about the calculations,  please visit our  Help area . To discontinue this report, go to Customize   (you will have to log in if you haven't already). Uncheck the "Daily Portfolio  Update" box and click on the "Apply Changes" button.  [IMAGE] ClearStation  is not an investment advisory service, nor a registered investment advisor  or broker-dealer and does not purport to tell or suggest which securities  members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should always check with  their licensed financial advisor and their tax advisor to determine the  suitability of any investment. ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary  of E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE Securities, Inc. ClearStation  is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc. E*TRADE is a registered  trademark of E*TRADE Securities, Incorporated, member NASD/SIPC. Copyright  (c) 2000. ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved.    [IMAGE]                  Question?  Get it answered!  Comments? Talk  to us!  Copyright ? 1998-2000 ClearStation. All rights reserved. Trademark  Notice  Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for Nasdaq, 20 minutes otherwise.  ClearStation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of E*TRADE Group, Inc.  [IMAGE]   About Us     I  Help      I  Feedback      I  Member  Agreement      I  Privacy  Statement     I  Advertise      I  Jobs      I Join       I FAQ                  [IMAGE]


This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by jimboman@ix.netcom.com.

I thought you might want to read this.
-Jim

jimboman@ix.netcom.com

Trying to Restore Confidence in Enron to Salvage a Merger

November 28, 2001

By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr. and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN

The Enron Corporation (news/quote) and Dynegy Inc.
(news/quote) worked yesterday to find ways to bolster
confidence in Enron's weakened energy- trading business as
the companies' negotiators continued talks on revising the
terms of their merger, executives close to the talks said.

The renegotiated deal would cut the value of the
acquisition by half, they said, to roughly $4 billion.
Dynegy, they said, was also prepared to invest at least an
additional $250 million in Enron, on top of the $1.5
billion cash infusion from Dynegy's biggest investor,
ChevronTexaco, included in the initial deal announced Nov.
9. But Dynegy wants the new cash backed by hard assets, and
the companies were trying to identify and value enough
Enron holdings not already mortgaged to other creditors,
the executives said.

Before a series of financial disclosures sent Enron's stock
into collapse and the company into the arms of Dynegy, its
Houston rival, Enron's natural gas and electricity trading
floors did more business than the two largest competitors
combined. They also accounted for the majority of Enron's
profits by far.

But traders and Wall Street analysts said the business had
steadily deteriorated amid questions about the depths of
Enron's financial straits. Many traders have curtailed
dealings with Enron, and the executives close to the talks
said Dynegy officials scouring Enron's books were having
difficulty this week figuring out how much cash the trading
operation was generating.

The executives close to the talks said that the
renegotiated terms for Dynegy's acquisition of Enron would
lower the price to about 0.13 Dynegy share for each share
of Enron, cutting by half the value of the deal announced
Nov. 9, when Dynegy offered 0.2685 share. If a deal is
struck at 0.13 Dynegy share, at yesterday's closing prices,
Dynegy would be paying about $5.32 an Enron share, a 29.4
percent premium over Enron's diminished stock price. The
premium was 20.6 percent over Enron's closing price on the
day that the deal was announced.

Both companies are seeking promises from Enron's bank
lenders to extend debt repayment dates until after the
merger closes. And they are also discussing adding
provisions that could limit Dynegy's ability to back out of
the combination.

The two companies are also working to arrange a cash
infusion of $500 million from J. P. Morgan Chase
(news/quote) and Citigroup (news/quote) that would provide
Enron with desperately needed new cash.

But there is growing concern that the cash infusion from
the banks will not calm investors' fears or reassure energy
traders, leading Dynegy to seek an additional $500 million
in cash for Enron. Late yesterday, the two companies were
hung up over whether Enron, which has already used many of
its most prized assets as collateral for loans, has enough
assets left to serve as collateral for the additional
money, according to executives close to the talks.

A number of Enron assets were being examined, including
some that have already been used to obtain other loans, the
executives said. The assets include: Transwestern Pipeline,
a major natural gas pipeline that links the gas-producing
basins of Texas and the Southwest with California; Enron's
stake in other gas- pipeline assets; its 9.8 percent stake,
worth about $400 million, in EOG Resources (news/quote), a
former subsidiary that is now an independent publicly
traded oil and gas company; and its indirect stake in
Hanover Compressor, which manufactures equipment used to
increase the pressure of natural gas and facilitate its
flow on interstate pipelines.

Yesterday, investors anxiously awaited a report by Moody's
Investors Service, which like other major credit-rating
firms, currently ranks Enron's debt at the lowest
investment-grade level. If Enron were to lose its
investment-grade status, it could be forced to repay or
refinance up to $3.9 billion in debt, while other traders
would probably further curtail business. But by late
yesterday, Moody's (news/quote) decided not to issue a
statement after receiving assurances from Enron and Dynegy
officials that a renegotiated deal would be announced soon,
the executives said. A Moody's spokesman declined comment.

Executives close to the talks said that they hoped that
new cash from Dynegy would reassure both Wall Street and
the energy-trading markets that Enron's trading floor would
survive and remain a valuable asset.

But analysts and investors are having difficulty figuring
how much value the trading operation has already lost, and
how much the business has been reduced because of credit
concerns.

"I believe Dynegy is probably seeing that deterioration in
the core business and wants to renegotiate the purchase
price as a result," said Andre Meade, head of United States
utilities research for Commerzbank Securities in New York.
"I don't think anyone can estimate the earning power of
Enron over the next three to four quarters, and I'm not
sure Enron has a good estimate."

Mr. Meade said he did not believe that Dynegy's earlier
estimate that the acquisition would add 90 cents a share to
its earnings was "reliable today, given how sharply the
business seems to have deteriorated." By Mr. Meade's
calculations, if Enron's trading volumes were to fall 50
percent next year - even if normal volume growth levels
returned in 2003 - that would wipe out nearly all the value
in the stock.

Karen Denne, an Enron spokeswoman, said the company had
experienced a decline in energy trading volume and in the
number of traders doing business with it, but both
stabilized yesterday. She declined to elaborate or quantify
the decline.

She also said that Enron's trading operation remained
profitable, though she could not quantify it, and she also
said she did not know whether the company was working on a
possible bankruptcy filing or other contingency plans
should its business and liquidity worsen. "We're moving
forward with the merger," she said.

Dynegy officials did not return telephone calls yesterday.

Shares of Enron rose yesterday on news of a possible
revised acquisition agreement. They closed at $4.11, up 2.5
percent, or 10 cents. Shares of Dynegy closed at $40.89, up
4.2 percent, or $1.64.

Though yesterday's gains halted a four-day slide in Enron
shares, the stock is down 95 percent this year after
disclosures of major losses as well as significant
accounting errors that led Enron to admit it overstated
profits during the last five years by nearly $600 million.

Now, difficulties within Enron's trading operation are
exacerbating the company's overall liquidity problems in
three ways, according to some analysts and rival
energy-trading executives.

First, other traders are requiring Enron to put up greater
margin on its trades. On top of that, in some cases Enron's
traders are being forced to pay more to buy natural gas
than traders at other companies. This credit premium in
some transactions has ranged from 3 cents to 6 cents for
every million British thermal units of gas Enron buys,
these people say.

Additionally, many traders, like the Mirant Corporation
(news/quote), have either scaled back or stopped doing
business with Enron, hurting its trading revenue.

Mr. Meade of Commerzbank said "end-use customers and
trading counterparties appear to be shifting their business
to competitors as a result of Enron's credit concerns and
are reluctant to increase their exposures to Enron."

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/28/business/28PLAC.html?ex=1007937624&ei=1&en=efdefb2d568fae37

HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


INTERNAL CANDIDATE response to job #104210.   I have not talked to him.


Greg, we live very close to you!  We have to get together soon.  I have sent
you an invitation to our New Year's Day party, and I hope you can come.

By the way, congrats on all the success and good press on Fusion.  It is well
deserved!

Merry Christmas!

Michelle

"Phillips, Gregory L (Legal)" <Gregory.Phillips@COMPAQ.com> on 12/16/99
10:32:00 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Address

Michelle:

I just got your voicemail and I was on a conference call.  However, I'm
running late to another meeting.  I will try to call you later today.  I
hope that the family is doing well and that you guys are having a wonderful
Holiday Season.  Here's our information:

Greg, Cynthia and Sidney Phillips
2711 S. Glen Haven Blvd.
Houston, TX 77025
713-660-7880

I will talk to you later.

GLP


Has legal received a credit worksheet on this counterparty?  Please give me a
call (or John!).  Thanks.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/10/99 03:48
PM ---------------------------
From: "John J Shoobridge/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on
08/10/99 08:21 PM
To: Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc: Rodolfo Freyre AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, Federico Cerisoli AT
ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, "Gabriela Aguilar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT
ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
Subject: Total's Master Swap Agreement

Sara:

Can you give me an update on this deal. The customer is calling and need to
let him know where are we standing on legal side of the business.

Regards
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Shoobridge/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/10/99 04:18 PM ---------------------------

John J Shoobridge
08/05/99 07:20 PM

To:   Patricia Cini@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc:
 Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico
Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gabriela
Aguilar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rodolfo
Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:  Total's Master Swap Agreement

Pat,

I have faxed to you the financial statements of  Total Austral S.A..

We are potentially entering into a MSA with this customer. The first
transaction we are thinking about is a financial Swap to hedge their
Propane-Butane production in Caadon Alfa according to the following details:

1. Swap                            Prices                         Prices
|------------------------+------------------------+------------------------|
| SWAP (cents/ gallon) - |         1 year         |        6 months        |
|          Bid           |                        |                        |
|------------------------+------------------------+------------------------|
|        Propane         |         35 3/4         |         38 3/4         |
|------------------------+------------------------+------------------------|
|         Butane         |         40 3/4         |         43 1/2         |
|------------------------+------------------------+------------------------|

2. Put Option
|--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------|
|  Put Option  |   1 year -   |   1 year -   |  6 months -  |  6 months -  |
|(cents/gallon)|   Premium    |    Strike    |   Premium    |    Strike    |
|--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------|
|   Propane    |     2.5      |    32 3/4    |      2       |    35 3/4    |
|--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------|
|    Butane    |     3.0      |    37 3/4    |    2 3/8     |      42      |
|--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+--------------|

Propane
Volume: 45.000 metric tons.
Starting date: Nov 1
Butane:
Volume: 19.000 metric tons.
Starting date: Nov 1

Sara: Would you please start drafting an MSA with Total Austral S.A.? Please
let me know if you need any aditional information.

Regards

John Shoobridge


just wanted to make sure you both had this...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001
09:37 PM ---------------------------
From: Cindy Derecskey on 05/01/2001 10:53 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Text of Dick Cheney's Toronto speech yesterday

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001 10:53 AM -----

	Linda Robertson
	05/01/2001 10:40 AM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Text of Dick Cheney's Toronto speech yesterday

 - AP - 4.30.doc


Fall sounds good to me.  In talking with Sue today, she stated that Dr. Rao
would like to inform the winners of the scholarships by letter from him and
that it will most likely be another week before he does so.  I asked her to
contact me when the letter is going out to the students so that we can follow
up with either a letter or phone call from some of us at Enron.  I will keep
Rick Causey, the other interviewers and you (or someone in your office)
updated on the timing of notifying the winners.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Elyse Kalmans @ ENRON                           04/06/2000 01:54 PM

To: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Lee, Charla Stuart/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Alexandra Saler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

I will plan the event for the fall - I'll be back from maternity leave and we
can get PR on campus for the event as well.  Thanks!  Elyse

Sharron Westbrook

04/06/2000 01:43 PM
To: Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Rick won't be back in the office until Monday but I am sure that this will be
ok with him.  His schedule is really tight for the next month.

	From:  Elyse Kalmans                           04/06/2000 01:33 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy Lee, Charla
Stuart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alexandra Saler/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Sally and Rick:  I am fine with having the dinner in the fall if y'all are ok
with that.  Actually, it will give us more flexibility to plan and get great
attendance.  Please let me know your thoughts, and I will communicate
directly with Sue White.

Thanks!  Elyse
---------------------- Forwarded by Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron on 04/06/2000
01:29 PM ---------------------------

Susan White <Susan.White@bus.utexas.edu> on 04/06/2000 10:19:12 AM
To: "'Elyse.Kalmans@enron.com'" <Elyse.Kalmans@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Hi Elyse - I just spoke with Ramesh Rao (associate dean).  He has not yet
made the Excellence Fund awards, which are also part of the Enron endowment.
He would like to have the dinner in the fall, when all of the awardees have
been chosen.  He felt that a dinner the end of April would conflict with a
major E-commerce conference we're having here, and the Enron awards would
get the attention they deserve in the fall.  The other advantage of a fall
dinner is that the new students will be here, and if we have a big
announcement then, they can see what they have to look forward to.  Will
this work for you?  Thanks.  Sue

-----Original Message-----
From: Elyse.Kalmans@enron.com [mailto:Elyse.Kalmans@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 9:05 AM
To: Susan White
Subject: RE: Enron MBA Excellence Awards - Dinner

Sue:  Thanks for your email.  In speaking with Rick Causey, the only day
that he is available is Monday, April 24.  In speaking with Sally Beck, I
know that you are confirming the 3 winners and will get me their info once
they have been chosen.  If you don't mind seeing who from the university is
available on the 24th, that would be great.  Our other option is to have it
another evening that week or rescheduling for the fall after classes begin.

As I mentioned before, I am expecting a baby two weeks from today, so I'd
love to have as much of this wrapped up before I pass it on to someone else
on my team.

Thanks for your help!
Elyse


Ed,
 Please have them print off 2 originals from the attached, sign and return to
me for execution by ENA.


I have a conference call w/ Jim Fallon on Wednesday and w/ Paul Racicot, Tuesday afternoon (4 p.m. c.d.t.)

I wanted to touch base w/ you on a few issues, before I speak to Jim.  Talk to you tomorrow.

1.  My plan at this point is to continue activity through the end of 2001, assuming no continued funding in 2002.
2.  Need to discuss a graceful exit strategy in DC with legislators and FCC.  (Not sure if there are any plans for any news release relative to EBS, but would want to coordinate a release with meetings in DC)
3.  Continuing to monitor legislation (including Economic Stimulus Bill (Upton Bill)) which includes accelerated depreciation of investments and tax credits for new investment.  Currently doesn't include anything on unbundling, a la Tauzin-Dingel, but we continue to monitor.
4.  Low likelihood of other legislation being passed out of Congress this year dealing with telecom.  We have been laying low in our coalition efforts with other Houston energy companies (i.e. El Paso and Dynegy).
5.  Venable, a law firm in DC, that is representing Verizon, is interested in Enron's participation in its coalition.  We haven't been able to find common ground on issues.  However, last approach indicated that Verizon views Enron's participation as having cache.  I would suggest approaching commercial folks to see if they think they can utilize the leverage of us joining the coalition in exchange for some commercial deal w/ Verizon.  Probably a long-shot, but maybe worth a look.  Problem here is Venable wants to use Enron's name in a public way around DC with lawmakers.  If we have exiting on our minds, doesn't make sense to make a big splash.
6.  SBC has filed for non-dominant status at the FCC for provision of advanced services.  Has the effect of removing SBC from regulatory oversight.  We are seeing what Comptel is doing and determining whether we will join in with their filing or file separately.
7.  Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) appears to be a new RBOC organization, filed a letter to the Bush Administration asking that access to advanced services not be provided to competitors on an unbundled basis.  Steve Burns has already met w/ Nancy Victory, Telecom Expert for the Administration, giving her the other side of the story.  This is another way of trying to get the Administration to weigh in on the issue.
8. 271 applications-3 BellSouth States (MS, LA, GA) have received state 271 authority, pending FCC review.  SBC has two application pending FCC review (AK and MO).  Qwest has announced its intent to file 7 or 8 applications by end of 1Q02.  We are not active at the state level.
9.  Interconnection agreements.  Hope to have majority of the agreements ready to file by November 01.  A few agreements, CO and NV, may take longer.

Thanks.

Mona


Dear Gerald,

It's another FREE SHIPPING offer at buy.com. Get free shipping on
items under 20 lbs. when you spend a combined total of $100.*
Click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD7h0BB2Pi0BVR0nWB0Ac

This free shipping offer is good for three days only. Just spend a
minimum of $100, and all shipping less than 20 pounds is on us!
Click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD7h0BB2Pi0BVR0nWB0Ac

Don't delay...this special FREE SHIPPING offer is good from Monday,
June 4th, thru Wednesday, June 6th.

As always, we thank you for choosing buy.com.

Tamara Ross
Customer Benefits Manager
buy.com

Anytime Help: Please use the link below for your Customer Support
questions. Please do not reply to the buy.com eMail address. It is not
an active mailbox. Click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD7h0BB2Pi0BVR0nWC0Ad

All prices and product availability subject to change without notice.
Unless noted, prices do not include shipping and applicable sales
taxes. Product quantities limited. List price refers to manufacturer's
suggested retail price and may be different than actual selling prices
in your area.  Please visit us at buy.com or the links above for more
information including latest pricing, availability, and restrictions
on each offer. "buy.com" and "The Internet Superstore" are
trademarks of BUY.COM Inc. , BUY.COM Inc. 2001.  All rights reserved.

*Free Shipping Offer:
Standard ground shipping method will be selected by buy.com. Due to
the weight of certain items, this free shipping offer does not apply
to monitors, printers, systems and other select products. Free
shipping offer is limited to items under twenty (20) pounds. If a
shipping charge applies, it will appear in your shopping basket at
checkout. $100 minimum purchase does not include shipping and
applicable taxes. This offer expires June 6th, 2001 at 11:59 P.M. EST.
buy.com reserves the right to end this free shipping offer at any time.

We respect your privacy. If you would rather not receive eMail
alerting you of buy.com special offers, product announcements,
and other news, just let us know by clicking here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/profile?y=eD7h0BB2Pi0BVRY


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Harvey Morris Esq.
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco, California   94102

  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power
Marketing, Inc. ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Inc. ("EES"), Enron Energy
Marketing Corporation ("EEMC"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. (EESO)
and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland General")(collectively
sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")

Harvey,

 Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued by
the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the Commission").
The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in undertaking its
investigation into the problems in the California electric markets by
producing a limited quantity of specified information on a timely basis.  We
believe that the limited production we propose will enable the Commission to
commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email exchange
of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission agrees that by
cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents, the Enron Entities
have not waived any objections or challenges to these subpoenas whatsoever
and that any claims, defenses, objections, jurisdictional or otherwise or
other responses have been specifically reserved and can be raised in the
future, if necessary.   For all of these proposals, we exclude documents
that are protected from disclosure by the attorney client and attorney work
product privileges.

 [SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION:  Generally speaking, the documents and
information that the Commission seeks can be found, if they exist, within
EPMI, EES and Portland General.  To the extent that EEMC or EESO are
relevant to the Commission's investigation, any documents would be located
within EES.  Thus, we do not anticipate specific document productions from
either EEMC or EESO.]

GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 1 through 4

 The Enron Entities have been very dynamic organizations having
acquired, sold, divested, joint ventured, spun off and otherwise reorganized
themselves extensively during the past two years.  The burden and expense on
Enron to locate, and produce every corporate organizational chart anywhere
in its organization since April 1, 1998 is significant.   The Enron entities
will provide the Commission with exemplars of its current organizational
charts, telephone directories and so called "family trees" to show its
current organization.  To the extent that Enron can readily identify and
locate exemplars of significant organizational charts, telephone directories
or so called "family trees" for earlier periods it will also make those
available.  One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its
corporate history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can
provide it.  With respect to the other entities, to the extent that
corporate histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate
producing these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.

Requests 5 and 6

 The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.

FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 7 through 11

 The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
will provide to the Commission electronic Transaction Documents for the
purchase and sale of energy delivered which includes economic data.   It is
intended that this economic data will provide the Commission with financial
information regarding the Enron Entities which will be useful to its
investigation.   We anticipate producing public filings regarding financial
data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic Transaction Documents in the
second wave of document productions.

GENERATING DOCUMENTS
Requests 12, 14 and 18

 For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
facilities are limited in number and there will probably be limited
documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent they act as a
scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or resell generation
output, do not have the specific documents that pertain to each generation
unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than Portland General, do have
documents and information for Enron Wind, Saguaro and Las Vegas
Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
document productions.

  For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about one
half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  In addition, those
transactions which do involve Portland General sales into California are
limited to sales to the ISO and PX, and long term contracts with two small
California municipal utilities.  Thus, the Commission will receive the
essential transactional information regarding these sales from the ISO and
PX.  Nevertheless, Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000
electronic Transaction Documents in summary form similar to the data being
provided by other Enron Entities, to the extent relevant.  [We propose that
the Commission defer requesting production of other information until it has
reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant proportion of
their energy into the California market.  At that time a more accurate
assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will be valuable
given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the California
wholesale market.]

[Alternate ending to paragraph:   We propose for the voluminous Portland
General generating cost and maintenance data, that these documents be made
available in Portland for inspection from a representative sampling of
facilities.  If there are specific documents that the Commission would like
copied from that production, we can discuss the arrangements for producing
these documents.  We propose to make these documents available in Portland
in a third wave of document productions]

TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19

 We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and PX.
EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of transaction data
for year 2000 (in California and outside of California and Real Time) for
the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the date, counterparty,
quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it is a purchase or a
sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this information, it is
possible that some entries will be incomplete or inaccurate.  For those
transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide quickly.
The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to EPMI's
customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
business.  EES is a retail provider of electricity, and plays a far more
limited role in the wholesale markets which are the subject of the
Commission investigation.  However, EES can also provide similar electronic
Transaction Data with the proviso that it will not include the specific
names of its retail customers but instead will provide a blind customer
number.  This additional restriction is important to EES because many of
EES's customers have agreements whereby they must be notified of any
subpoena and provided an opportunity to object.  EES cannot meet your time
frame to release information and give its customers the notice they require.
Given that EES was a retail provider and the fact that the identity of
retail customers is of little or no relevance to the functioning of the
wholesale market, we do not believe protecting the identity of retail
customers is an unreasonable limitation or narrowing of the request.  We
anticipate producing the transaction data in the second wave of document
productions.

FERC DOCUMENTS

Request 20

 The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October 13,
2000.

 Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
production by then.

 We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one currently
in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions will be
protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition, if, at the
request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the Commission or a
court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests for production be
limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities reserve the right to
limit the production of documents in conformance with such order.

 We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
or myself.

Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP

Gary Fergus

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Mary Kay and Greg would like to discuss with you the Sublette Compressor station enforcement by conference call on Wednesday, Oct. 24, at 9:30 am. (approx. 30 minutes).

Please let me know if you are available.  Mary Kay and Greg will call each of your offices.

Thanks
Ann for Greg Porter
(402) 398-7091


---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 02:57
PM ---------------------------

Priya Jaisinghani@ENRON
12/07/2000 02:10 PM
To: Jayshree Desai/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Fwd: FW: the hand of hope

Thought you might like this, Dr. Desai.

>
>A picture began circulating in November. In many people's opinions, it
>should  be proclaimed as "The Picture of the Year," or perhaps, "The
>Picture of the Decade."  The picture is that of
>a 21-week-old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander Armas, who is being
>operated on by a surgeon named Joseph Bruner. The baby was diagnosed
>with Spina Bifida and would not Survive if removed from the mother's
>womb. Little Samuel's mother,Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in
>Atlanta. She knew of Dr. Bruner's remarkable surgical procedure.
>Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he
>performs these special operations while the baby is still in the womb.
>In the procedure, a C-section removes the uterus and the doctor makes a
>small incision to operate on the baby. During the surgery on little
>Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny, but fully developed, hand
>through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon's finger. The
>photograph captures this amazing event with perfect clarity. The editors
>titled the picture, "Hand of Hope." The text explaining the picture
>begins, "The tiny hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas
>emerges from the mother's uterus to grasp the finger of Dr.Joseph Bruner
>as if thanking the doctor for the gift life...."
>
>You can see the actual picture.  Here's the  website:
>    http://joseromia.tripod.com/bighand.gif
><http://joseromia.tripod.com/bighand.gif>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Just a reminder - Benefits enrollment for 2001 has started.  You have until
3:00 pm on October 22, 2000 to make any changes to your benefits.
By now, you should have received the details of open enrollment at your home
address.

If you do not have any changes to your benefits, you do not need to do
anything and you will automatically be re-enrolled in your current coverage.

OR

If you have changes that you need to make, you can do so by calling Benefits
on Call at 1-800-425-5864 or by enrolling via The Enrollment System at
www.Enron.BenefitsNow.com.

Changes for 2001:

QualMed has been eliminated as an HMO choice for 2001 due to increased
premium costs and low usage.  If you have QualMed and do not change your
benefits through the open enrollment process, your coverage will
automatically be defaulted to $1,250 deductible.

Also, please look at the cost of the different programs closely.  There have
been significant price increases in some of the HMO plans that are offered.

With regards to filing claims for the year 2000, please note the following
deadlines.
For medical and dental, the deadline is December 31, 2001 for claims incurred
in 2000.
For flexible spending accounts, the deadline is April 30, 2001 for expenses
incurred in year 2000.
The deadline for the vision plan expenses is six months following the date of
service.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks!
Amy


Sounds good to me.  I don't see why the buyer would need the redacted
information, other than curiosity.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           12/06/2000 03:03 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Procedure for Making Gleason and Wheatland Contracts Available

Presumably this will work?  Additionally, we should be able to apply this
same model to Brownsville, though they didn't mention it.

Thoughts?

MItch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000
03:02 PM ---------------------------

Saugstad Kathryn <Kathryn.Saugstad@swpc.siemens.com> on 12/06/2000 02:20:43 PM
To: "'Mitch.Robinson@enron.com'" <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>
cc: DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKrey@swpc.siemens.com>

Subject: Procedure for Making Gleason and Wheatland Contracts Available

Mitch:

This E-mail is a follow-up to our telephone discussion today. With regard to
providing copies of the Gleason and Wheatland contracts to Allegheny,
Siemens Westinghouse proposes the following:

1.  Siemens Westinghouse will prepare and forward to Enron electronically
our standard confidentiality agreement addressed to Allegheny.

2.  Once the confidentiality agreement has been executed, Siemens
Westinghouse will forward the PDP files (we believe that these agreements
are executed) to Enron.  We will redact the pricing information and the
liquidated damages provisions. If the agreements are not signed, we will
provide the signature pages under separate cover.

If this is not satisfactory, please let me know.

Kathryn Saugstad
Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation
Project Contracts
Sr. Contract Analyst
407-736-2945


I attended a class two weeks ago.  It was interesting.  Are there plans to
make the application web based?


Sharon Brown
ETS Gas Control
713-853-5660


From the office of Mr. Mark Haedicke!

Please note the attachment.

Thank you


Rosalee-

There should be sufficient funds without Shell's funds.  If things change, I
will call you back.

Thank you for following up.

Mike Telle

MIchael S. Telle
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
mtelle@velaw.com
713-758-2350


Do I need to cross reference the deals in my model to the deals in the system
or did you already do that?

Chris


Hi Selena,

I received a phone call today from ITG indicating that their business persons
overlooked a step in the procedural/legal process of getting Quantex
installed.  As you know, I executed the NASDAQ, AMEX etc. agreements that
accompanied the Quantex agreement itself.  ITG indicated that they never
faxed to us one more of these such agreements that has to get done and that
they are going to fax it on Monday when the requisite operations person
returns.  Once this last statement is executed on Monday they will be able to
stall the equipment.

They further indicated that, in practical terms, there overnight should not
cause any further delay because they are just shipping the equipment today
for installation on Monday or Tuesday.  I will keep you posted.

Feel free to call me Monday afternoon for an update and to insure that we are
getting this last agreement executed.

Julie, if I have any business-IT questions, I will call you on Monday.  I
anticipate that in light of all the other agreements, everything will be
straight forward and I will get the agreement reviewed and executed pretty
quickly.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


You are such a renewable energy stud! I'm excited to see you and Elliot
transform the way the world thinks of POWER.

K
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/05/2001 12:51 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Elliot Mainzer                           04/05/2001 12:37 PM

To: Portland West Desk
cc:

Subject: Renewable Power Desk

I am pleased to announce that Jesse Bryson will be joining me as a Research
Analyst on the Renewable Power Desk effective April 16.


Jere,  I have reviewed the draft and everything looks fine except for the $10
million cap.  Dave and I had discussed a $2 million cap.  I would request
that the $2 million cap be inserted.  Please let me know if you have any
questions.

	"Bates, Jere" <jbates@tristategt.org>
	09/18/2000 12:02 PM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc: "Nocera, Dave" <dnocera@tristategt.org>, "Stribling, Richard"
<rstribling@tristategt.org>
		 Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Gerald,

Enclosed is the latest version which I understand you and David N discussed.
I understand there are changes to sections 2 and 6.  Dave asked me to send
to you in his absence.  Please let us know if this is on target.

Jere Bates <<TSdraft.conf.agr.9-18-00.doc>>

 - TSdraft.conf.agr.9-18-00.doc


Profile Manager also has this counterparty on transact for other European
financial products.  Are we really trading those products, because I don't
think we should be ...?


From today's Gas Daily:

+Three strikes, bill hits California

California Assemblyman Dennis Cardoza,
a Democrat, will introduce a bill today that will
make it a felony for any energy supplier in California
to engage in a conspiracy to drive up prices
or manipulate the market.

The bill would apply to any company selling
gas or electricity into the state or to any of the
state,s utilities, said a spokesman for Cardoza.

Under terms of the proposed legislation,
offenders would be subject to California,s "three
strikes" law, which sentences convicted felons
to jail for life after three offenses. Directors, officers
or any other employees associated with
market manipulation of a company would be
subject to this bill, the spokesman said.

Cardoza will introduce the bill at a press
conference today at 2 p.m. Pacific time. CD

______________________________________________________________________

 No easy solutions to crisis

The crisis in California is far beyond short-term
fixes parading as potential solutions, and
there is no turning back for deregulation in the
state, according to a report released yesterday
by consulting firm Andersen.

California has no choice but to forge ahead in
repairing the damage that ill-planned deregulation
measures have caused, the Energy Crisis in the
Western U.S.: Lessons for navigating regulatory
and market minefields report says. "There,s a common
wisdom that knows you can,t unscramble the
egg," said Matt Smith, head of Andersen,s North
American energy consulting practice. All that can
be done is correct the mistakes, he added.
In addition, steps must be implemented to
prevent the spread of the California "virus" to
other states, electricity marketplaces, Smith said.

"To begin, in our view, the energy crisis in the
western U.S. has produced formidable challenges
for utility industry regulators, state and federal
policymakers, and industry executives," Smith said.
"The virus spawned in California requires new strategies
to contain and reverse the damage.

"The implications for the development of
competitive energy markets go far beyond the
western United States. Unfortunately, California
has taught the nation that regulatory and political
barriers can create and sustain an energy crisis."

The proposed solutions put in motion by
federal and state regulators, as well as California
policymakers, have only led to an increasingly
uncertain market and tension among those
working for a viable resolution, the report says.

"In reaction to the breakdown, many of
California,s political leaders now prefer to abandon
deregulation," the report says.

The report concludes that power shortages
and blackouts are inevitable this summer. The
deregulated marketplace, which took a year to
throw off track, will more than likely take a number
of years to put right, the report says. MCM

________________________________________________________

Competing evidence clouds Calif. investigation

Prompted in part by the California Public Utilities Commission, the
California Assembly
has been scrutinizing the role that interstate pipelines have played in the
state,s current
energy crisis. In the efforts to find a smoking gun, legislators have leaned
heavily on a
report prepared by The Brattle Group, a consultancy commissioned by utility
Southern California
Edison to dig up evidence of market power abuse.

But the state,s biggest transporter of gas to California -- El Paso Natural
Gas -- is not
ready to take the rap. The pipeline has commissioned its own study, which it
recently presented
as evidence that it has not circumvented any laws or regulation.

As reported in both the trade press and national media, SoCal Ed and the CPUC
are pointing
the finger of blame at El Paso for alleged manipulation of California border
prices through
affiliate deals and capacity hoarding. And exhibit A in their case against El
Paso is The Brattle
Group,s study of the California market.

Richard Zeiger, a spokesman for Assembly Member Darrell Steinberg, chairman
of the
California Assembly Judiciary Committee, told Gas Daily that The Brattle
Group,s market
study proved that the surge in gas prices at the California border was not
caused by normal
market forces (GD 4/20). His remarks followed an oversight hearing during
which Assembly
members questioned Dynegy and El Paso officials about their involvement in
the California
market.

El Paso presented a different version of events to the Assembly. In a report
presented to
legislators, a research group hired by El Paso concluded that a convergence
of factors, not a
conspiracy, caused the price run-up.

Lukens Consulting Group, a Houston-based consultancy, was retained by El Paso
to conduct
work on several fronts. In its study of the California market, Lukens
concluded that the
increasing convergence of the gas and electricity businesses was one of the
main culprits in the
California gas price imbroglio.

Assemblyman John Campbell, a Republican member of the oversight committee,
said he
"didn,t see any smoking gun" in either report.

"We had our committee hearing, and we certainly had a lot on the Brattle
Study and a little
on the Lukens study. To some degree, I,m not sure that the California
legislature is the best
place to adjudicate the differences between these two studies," Campbell
said. "I believe FERC
is looking at this situation " and it would seem to me that that,s the
appropriate place."

Campbell said that the CPUC had been prodding the California legislature to
give support
to its claims of market power abuse by pipelines. "It,s being pushed
basically by the Public
Utilities Commission here, which believes that there was collusion" by
pipeline companies to
push up gas prices in California, he said.

The CPUC, Campbell suggested, sought satisfaction before the California
assembly when
it had failed on the federal level: "There,s a concerted effort, not just on
natural gas but on other
things here in California, for entities and organizations here to point the
finger elsewhere for
the problems that we,re having in this state and I think you,re seeing some
of that with the
public utilities commission."

Whether either report wins over the public incensed by high natural gas
prices is a different
matter entirely. In the meanwhile, the dueling California market studies seem
to have taken
on a life of their own.

The Brattle Group Study, for instance, has become the center of a heavily
litigated effort to
force FERC to compel the release of market data by California market
participants. Following
on a request by SoCal Ed, which said it needed additional data to round out
The Brattle Group
report, FERC Chief ALJ Curtis Wagner issued subpoenas to the other three
major pipelines that
serve the state as well as to Sempra Energy Trading.

Several parties resisted FERC,s call for market information, saying the
requested data
contained commercially sensitive information. FERC allowed the discovery
process to move
forward but only after attaching strict data protection rules restricting
access to evidence
(GD 4/23).

Critics of the pipeline industry have already suffered one setback in their
case. The commission
recently dismissed the CPUC,s claim that El Paso rigged the auction of a
large block of
pipeline capacity in favor of affiliate El Paso Merchant Energy. In
addressing the California
Assembly, representatives of Dynegy said that FERC,s recent ruling on the
California border
controversy obviated the need for more investigation.

The controversy, however, is far from over. FERC last month also ordered a
hearing into
whether El Paso Natural Gas and its affiliates manipulated capacity to drive
up the price of gas
delivered into California (GD 3/29). That hearing is likely to take place
this summer. (RP00-
241, et al.) NH


All,  A fix to prevent the occurrence of deals not bridging to Sitara from EOL when deal start and end dates were not entered on EOL has been installed and tested.THANKS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:22 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara; Truong, Dat; Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Subject:	Request for Migration of Sitara EOLBridge into Production

Hello Zhiyong,
	I have implemented an enhancement to avoid the problem of restarting the Sitara EOLBridge when there are missing startdate and enddate.  This fix will take care of this morning's problem.

EOL will be sent a Failed status similar to the following:
	message={EolTransactionId=2101638 TransactionSysDealId="" BridgeEntityName="EOLBridge" Message="Missing StartDate or EndDate" Status="F" BridgeDate="20011025170945CDT"}

I throughly tested the change by sending over 400 sample deals from this morning.  Due to the "Bid Week" window, please approve this  bridge enhancement for tonight's migration.  Thank you.

-Dat Truong x63015

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara
Subject:	Sitara EOL Bridge Problem Today

The problem we faced today was due to 2 eol deal packets (2098073, 2099764) not having startdate and enddate.  Missing these 2 tibco message fields caused the bridge to bounce and resulted in the queue to build up while the bridge is starting up. (The bridge takes 2 minute for startup).  Each time these deals are sent/resent, it continuously cause the Sitarar EOLBridge to restart, thus magnifying the buildup of the queue.

The corrective action we are taking at our end is to build a rejection logic when eol packets do not have start and/or enddate.

-Dat Truong


Melba is still reviewing the 65,000.


I don't know if this will be helpful or not....
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 03:43 PM -----

	Jordan Mintz
	11/22/2000 02:44 PM

		 To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joel Ephross/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julia H
Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nora
Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brenda L Funk/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina
Karathanos/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Dealflow - 11/22/00

Attached are the EGF-Legal dealflow sheets for Q4--in progress and closed
transactions.  Please feel free to contact me or any of the EGF attorneys or
assistants with any questions and/or comments you may have.

Jordan
---------------------- Forwarded by Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 02:39
PM ---------------------------

Darlene C Forsyth
11/22/2000 02:13 PM
To: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dealflow - 11/22/00


Everyone:

I forgot to mention, these are due today.  Comments back as soon as possible
are appreciated.

Sarah

	Sarah Novosel
	12/13/2000 11:17 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron,
Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron,
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT, pkaufma@enron.com, pallen@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Response to San Diego Request for Gas Price Caps

Please review the attached draft Enron comments in response to the San Diego
request for natural gas price caps.  The comments reflect Becky Cantrell's
comments (which are reflected in red line).  Please respond to me as soon as
possible with your comments, and please pass it on to anyone else who needs
to see it.

Thanks

Sarah


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
03:43 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           01/31/2001 01:23 PM

To: cbpres@austin.rr.com
cc: llewter@austin.rr.com
Subject:


Greetings:
Yesterday at the ISO several of us were successful in communicating the need
for a more diverse "Market Repair Team" that would include perhaps some
additional members and a "Stakeholder Advisory Committee".  We were also
successful in communicating our cost-benefit analysis and delaying the
immediate adoption of the team. The motion (approved 5-0) read:

Board of Governors Market Repair Team
MOVED, that the Board approve the concept of a Market Repair Team along the
lines described in the Florio memorandum of March 14, 2001, and directs ISO
management to provide a response to the proposal addressing among other
issues, issues of cost/ benefit, conflicts of interest, team composition at
the next Board meeting.

IEP, CMUA, SMUD, and Grid Services were all asked to submit some proposed
names by today to the ISO Management, please see below e-mail from Elaina:

Today during the Public Comment, you all indicated that you might have names
as potential members of the Advisory Group for the Market Repair Team.  It
is not clear at this point how the whole process will be structured, but we
have been asked to put together a proposed game plan including names for
potential members of the Advisory Group.  Please send them to me ask quickly
as you can:  Friday pm is what Chairman Kahn asked for.

We would like to be as responsive as possible to the request and have
thought of the idea of proposing someone that EPSA uses in a variety of
roles.  CMUA will also probably be proposing someone from their national
organization.  The name that has been suggested for IEP to submit is Craig
Roach of Boston Pacific consulting who has done extensive work for EPSA in
supporting a competitive market policy. There is more information on Dr.
Roach and Boston Consulting on their web site www.bostonpacific.com.  I
spoke with Julie Simon at EPSA this morning and she also gave him an
enthusiastic endorsement.

Another idea or an additional person to submit  would be an economist that
is involved heavily in California.  Since both Hogan and Joskow have
financial ties to market participants we may want to consider proposing our
own economist.  It is the plan to submit both names to the ISO as well as a
letter addressing the following:

1. Raise very gently the issue of potential conflict of interest, coupled
with cost/benefit analysis etc
2. Address structural issues, including how stakeholders will participate.
3. Propose more diversity for the Market Repair Team,
4. Propose a Stakeholder Advisory Group as a third box, and include
stakeholders, including a regional perspective like neighboring control
areas, and folks with operational and market experience

It is crucial that if this plan sends up any red flags for you that you get
back to me ASAP.  I will be sending this letter to the ISO this afternoon
after we get the logistics worked out.  IF you have problems with this
direction please supply additional names we can route with the group.  I
have talked to a few companies that were at the meeting yesterday and they
are comfortable but wanted to make sure everyone had a say.

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


We need to work through this.. some of this amount needs to go to the New York short term trader.. I am going to look into and will need a breakdown from you day by for these days(8/6 thru 8/10).

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mansfield, Marci
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:23 PM
To:	Thomas, Paul D.
Subject:	RE: August Trans Loss Charges

 $151,349.24 	 $59,330.85
700778.3	700783.3

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, Paul D.
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:23 PM
To:	Mansfield, Marci
Subject:	RE: August Trans Loss Charges

What is the amount?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mansfield, Marci
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Thomas, Paul D.
Cc:	Evans, Casey; Grace, Rebecca M.; Franklin, Warrick
Subject:	August Trans Loss Charges

Paul:

The estimated trans loss charges for August have been entered (NE Hourly # 700778.3 @ ; NE Phys # 700783.3).  They're unusually high due to the increase in deal volumes as well as inflated prices due to extreme heat (08/06 thru 08/10 in particuar).  If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to come by and discuss with me or Rebecca.  Just wanted to give you a heads up.

-Marci


The other place in San Antonio is Westin's La Canterra.  I will contact both
and get info.  Then we should make reservations soon.  I'll call Cindy
tonight and fill her in.  -Sally

"White, Cara" <CWhite@texas.usta.com> on 01/10/2001 05:46:04 PM
To: "'Sally.Beck@enron.com'" <Sally.Beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: anniversary

Great!   I will be working late again - but should be home after 7:00 or so-
Talk to you later

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sally.Beck@enron.com [SMTP:Sally.Beck@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 5:09 PM
> To: White, Cara
> Subject: Re: anniversary
>
>
> I love it!!  I think that is perfect.  Much easier for my family and
> probably for everyone else.  That way we can probably do this on their
> anniversary, assuming that works for everyone.  Removing some of the
> travel
> hassels should mean that everyone would have a better time, too.  Hyatt
> Hill Country is one obvious choice - I was there in November and it is
> still very nice.  There is a newer resort in the area also.  I can't think
> of the name of it offhand, but David knows and I will get the name from
> him
> tonight and call you.  --Sally
>
>
>
>
> "White, Cara" <CWhite@texas.usta.com> on 01/10/2001 02:41:12 PM
>
> To:   "'sally.beck@enron.com'" <sally.beck@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  anniversary
>
>
> Sally - A new idea popped into my head - I don't know if it makes things
> easier - or if everyone would like the idea, but here goes:
>
> What if we gathered, as a whole family, for a couple of days, somewhere
> easy
> - in Texas - like the Hill Country Hyatt, or somehwere in Galveston, or
> the
> YO Ranch or somewhere.   We might spend one night or two - plan something
> fun for the kids, get a big suite where the adults could toast mom and dad
> with champagne and appetizers - spend time playing games, whatever - just
> go
> somewhere easy - and just spend a day or two.
>
> Then, at that event, we could give Mom and Dad a gift certificate for a
> more
> special (and far-away) trip for them - like a four-day weekend in San
> Francisco - or somewhere they'd really like to go.
>
> This would eliminate travel hassles for all of the families involved - but
> provide us all an opporunity (albeit condensed) to get together - and Mom
> and Dad would still get to go someplace fun.    Maybe we could "chip in"
> varying amounts to Mom and Dad's trip so that cindy and richard could
> afford
> it.
>
> Thoughts?   -Cara
>
> Cara White
> Community Development Coordinator
> USTA Texas Section
> 1-888-883-6388
> cWhite@texas.usta.com
>
>
>
>
>


you are such a baby.  i can't go.  didn't your dad also teach you that you can't always get your way.  and you can't be mad at me.  it's not my fault.  aren't you going to see sarah anyway?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:58 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

forget it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:58 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

please what?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yep, please

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:56 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you get silly.  i get dummy.  i can't go you goofball!  are you really going?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:55 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no dummy its next week, maybe we can see the tree in rockefeller center, im really psyched

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:54 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you are so funny!  i cna't go thursday because i have to be here to eat turkey and i have to be in dallas on saturday night to go out for my birthday.  sorry.  maybe next time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:53 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no thanks but i did book our tickets to ny, we leave on thur night and come back sunday, happy packing


I have spoken to Mark, he will send a list of issues to Nancy prior to the hearing.  The committee will acknowledge that you are an Enron employee, however, you are appearing in the capacity of  Chair of RMS subcomittee.  Bill B. from Ercot will be present, however he was not the most stellar witness.  Mark thinks Chairman Wolens will want to hear directly from the Chair of RMS.  The questions that you may be asked include:  what has RMS recommended to TAC, address issues of cutover from version 1.3 to 1.4...where are we, where do we go next, where are the participants on the issue?  Mark is preparing the list of questions and will email it to you soon.

Representative Paul Hilbert died last night.  If the funeral services are scheduled for Friday, the hearing will be postponed to enable the members of the committee to attend the funeral.  We may not know the date of the funeral until Wednesday.  I will let everyone know ASAP whether or not the legislative takes place on Friday.  Thanks, Jean

-----Original Message-----
From: Hetrick, Nancy
Sent: Mon 10/29/2001 11:33 AM
To: Keene, Patrick; Lindberg, Susan; Nicolay, Christi L.; Ogenyi, Gloria; Ryall, Jean; Steffes, James D.; Twiggs, Thane
Cc:
Subject: Texas Legislative Oversight Committee

Mark Bruce, Policy Analyst, Electric Resturcturing Legislative Oversight Committee, attended the October 25th RMS meeting.  When he left, he gave me his card and asked me to contact him after the meeting, which I did.  He asked that I forward my contact information and asked if I could be available to attend the Legislative Oversight Committee meeting on Friday, November 2nd.  This is the email that I received from him after I sent my contact information.  He has not elaborated on exactly what questions he has or would have for me.

Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426

 -----Original Message-----
From:   "MARK BRUCE_HC" <Mark.Bruce_hc@house.state.tx.us>@ENRON
Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 12:21 PM
To:     Hetrick, Nancy
Subject:        Re: Contact Information

Thanks for your response ... Connie shared her V 1.4 cutover questions and  concerns with me ... if you reply to her e-mail prior to the Wed. RMS meeting,  please include me in your reply.

I'll keep in touch with you regarding possible questions from the oversight  committee on Nov. 2.

/\/\ark Bruce
policy analyst
Electric Utility Restructuring
Legislative Oversight Committee
office: 512-463-0814
mobile: 512-576-8995
fax: 512-463-6783
e-mail: mark.bruce_hc@house.state.tx.us <<mailto:mark.bruce_hc@house.state.tx.us>>


Let's discuss a bit.  When you get a chance, please page me at 888.916.7184.

Best,
Jeff

	John Shelk
	06/26/2001 01:22 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Follow Up On California Information

Alan and I spoke about point #2 on the comparison benchmark.  At this point,
we may be able to just say it is based on a comparison of the contracts with
today's forward market and gloss over the exact forward curve we used.  Of
course if there is a way to come up with a similar number using publicly
available data (or if we are willing to provide our numbers if pressed) then
all the better.  In the mean time, should I hold off on using the $13.8
billion number until I hear back from you about the conversation with Steve?

Also, do I understand correctly from Alan that the $13.8 billion figure is
NOT comparing the long term contracts California signed with recent spot
market prices, but rather is a comparison of the contracts to our present
forward pricing curves?  From you e-mail, it is the latter, I take it.

As to point #1, on the deal last year, we just need a similar "back of the
envelope" calculation on what California could have saved had California
taken us up on the offers we and others made.  Any guidance on where to get
that would be most helpful.


our football game is at 7 - sorry

Bryan Hull
10/02/2000 10:19 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denver
Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick
Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Game @ 7:00

Our game is at 7:00 this week, Let me know if you will be there or not.


[IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   It took 17 years to create Black House, Stephen King's stunning sequel to The Talisman. Now, the wait is over! Twenty years after Jack Sawyer's adventures in the Territories, he is drawn back to his own hidden past, where he must find the strength to enter a terrifying house and face the obscene and ferocious evils sheltered within.
[IMAGE]	 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  When you sign up for one year  of our BasicListener? plan, you'll get a Free Rio600 MP3 Player. The Rio holds up to 10 hours of Audible entertainment - use it to listen to any of our audiobooks or any of your MP3 music files.  Bonus: Free cassette adapter (a $20 value) if you act now!   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	       Audible is the source for great audio entertainment and information. Now you can forget about those expensive and clumsy audiobooks on cassette and CD. Audible is digital so you can listen on any computer or AudibleReady? Pocket PC or MP3 player. Listen on your commute or at the gym, or anywhere you want to get away from it all.  Listen to the best in popular fiction, sci-fi, business, history and so much more. [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		Note: While supplies last. You may have received this in error if you currently have more than one active Audible account. Audible reserves the right to cancel, change or substitute this offer at any time. Void where prohibited by law and subject to all federal, state and local laws and regulations. Some titles are not available in all countries. For a complete list of titles available throughout the world, Click. Hear.   ? Copyright 2001 Audible, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


January 27th and February 24th sound good.  Meagan has a big dance on Jan.
27th, and I need to be here to help with prep and to take pictures.  February
17th is our anniversary (22nd!!), so that is probably not a good date
either.  So if you can make one of the other two dates work, I would love to
come.  Just keep me posted.

"White, Cara" <CWhite@texas.usta.com> on 12/05/2000 04:35:38 PM
To: "'sally.beck@enron.com'" <sally.beck@enron.com>
cc: "'cwhite@viviance.com'" <cwhite@viviance.com>
Subject: baby shower / dates

Hi, Sal!    I've been meaning to call you for several days - but it's been a
bit of a madhouse, so I thought I might fire off an e-mail:

I don't know if you've talked with Cindy in the past few days - but, if it's
okay with you, I'd like to decline your very sweet offer of having a baby
shower.   Here's the deal:  A couple of friends had already offered to do
one - and I'm having trouble coming up with a vibrant mix of people to split
amongst two showers.
This seems to be a good decision for Cindy, too, since may be a bit short of
cash and energy right now.

However, I would LOVE for you to come to the one shower - if it's convenient
for you.  I would love for you to meet my friends, and for them to meet you!
If it doesn't work for you, I'll certainly understand - especially since you
may want to come again when baby is born.  But, if you'd like to consider
coming, I'd like to know your schedule.  We're talking about a weekend lunch
or afternoon thing I think.   In January or February, I"m available on the
following weekends:
Jan. 20
Jan. 27
Feb. 17
Feb. 24.
I think going any later than this might be cutting it close!    What I need
from you is to know which of these weekends you might be available.   The
"shower planners" are getting eager to plan.  THANKS! -cara

Cara White
Community Development Coordinator
USTA Texas Section
1-888-883-6388
cWhite@texas.usta.com


Hi.  Sorry for the delay.  Today's big FERC hearing has had me wrapped up.
Please read the following and keep VERY confidential---it's an internal PG&E
summary.  Electronic version of OII to follow.

Best,
Jeff
******************************************************************************
****************
Yesterday, the Commission issued an OII to determine the
> adequacy of Sempra Energy's, SoCalGas' and SDG&E's gas transmission
> practices and to determine what measures need to be taken to correct any
> deficiencies.  The OII orders the Sempra affiliates and parent to
> demonstrate that SDG&E's gas supply and transmission system are adequate
> to provide service to present and future core and noncore customers.
>
>       As you may recall, the OII sprang from an AL that SDG&E
> filed in August requesting emergency review and approval of its proposals
> to temporarily revise gas transportation service elections to its noncore
> customers.  SDG&E subsequently pulled the advice letter after the
> Commission issued a resolution rejecting it and outlined an OII it was
> going to issue on this matter.  The language in the OII that was issued
> yesterday is substantially similar to that which was in the Commission's
> original draft resolution.
>
>       The Sempra companies have been ordered to appear at a soon
> to be determined PHC to show cause and demonstrate that:
>
>       1. SDG&E has adequate gas transmission supply for the
> 2000/2001 winter heating season, as well as the longer term supply
> throughout the year.  If supply is inadequate, SDG&E shall submit plans
> for obtaining adequate supply.
>       2. SDG&E gas and transmission supply is adequate to meet
> anticipated need for gas fired generation.  If not, SDG&E shall submit
> plans for obtaining adequate supply.
>       3. SDG&E's gas transmission service is not being adversely
> affected by interests of its corporate affiliate.
>       4. Recently added demands on SDG&E's capacity are not
> negatively impacting supply for SDG&E's customers. and otherwise
> consistent with representations made to the Commission.
>       5. SDG&E's current gas curtailment rules are just and
> reasonable; if not, SDG&E shall propose changes.
>
>       We are going to need to keep a careful eye on this
> proceeding as it develops to make sure it stays focused on events in
> southern California.  Commission Bilas gave me assurances last week before
> the OII was issued that it was a Sempra problem, not a statewide problem.
> However, given everyone's sensitivities to EG concerns, its a proceeding
> that could easily be expanded beyond its current narrow focus.  I'll
> forward you all a copy of the order later today.
>
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/09/2000 12:02 PM -----

	Susan Scott
	11/09/2000 09:41 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich
		 cc:
		 Subject: New OII

The proceeding is I0011002; I think the order was issued Nov. 2.

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/09/2000
09:40 AM ---------------------------

Susan Scott
11/06/2000 02:28 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich
cc:

Subject: New OII

Jeff, I read in Gas Daily that the Cal PUC has issued an OII on the adequacy
of supply and pipeline infrastructure in southern California.  Could you have
someone send me a copy of the order whenever it is issued?  Steve thinks it's
something we might want to get involved in, but I need to know more.

Great to see you last week.

Ciao,
Susan


sign me up please, thank you very very much

geof

Parking & Transportation@ENRON
03/28/2001 04:07 PM
Sent by:	DeShonda Hamilton@ENRON
To:	Brad Alford/NA/Enron@Enron, Megan Angelos/Enron@EnronXGate, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Allario/Enron@EnronXGate, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irma Alvarez/Enron@EnronXGate, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Pam Becton/Enron@EnronXGate, Corry Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Bloom/Enron@EnronXGate, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jerry Britain/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Michelle Blaine/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Arguijo/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Carter/Enron@EnronXGate, Carmen Chavira/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher K Clark/Enron@EnronXGate, Morris Richard Clark/Enron@EnronXGate, Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karla Compean/Enron@EnronXGate, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/Enron@EnronXGate, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael Danielson/SF/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara G Dillard/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Rufino Doroteo/Enron@EnronXGate, Christine Drummond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laynie East/Enron@EnronXGate, John Enerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig A Fox/Enron@EnronXGate, Julie S Gartner/Enron@EnronXGate, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Butler/Enron@EnronXGate, Chris Clark/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ron Coker/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Coleman/EWC/Enron@Enron, Nicki Daw/Enron@EnronXGate, Ranabir Dutt/Enron@EnronXGate, Kurt Eggebrecht/ENRON@enronxgate, Marsha Francis/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Margaret Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maria E Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Humberto Cubillos-Uejbe/HOU/EES@EES, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ned E Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Gibson/Enron@EnronXGate, George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alisa Green/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert Greer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy L Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tosha Henderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/Enron@EnronXGate, Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Hoover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, John House/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/Enron@EnronXGate, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/Enron@EnronXGate, Patrick Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Jon/Enron@EnronXGate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Kerrigan/Enron@EnronXGate, Kyle Kettler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faith Killen/Enron@EnronXGate, Joe Gordon/Enron@EnronXGate, Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Herron/Enron@EnronXGate, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lynna Kacal/Enron@EnronXGate, Allan Keel/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Kimball/NA/Enron@Enron, Bruce Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kim Hickok/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth Howley/HOU/EES@EES, John King/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate, Troy Klussmann/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/Enron@EnronXGate, Kevin Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lindsay Long/Enron@EnronXGate, Blanca A Lopez/Enron@EnronXGate, Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Magee/Enron@EnronXGate, Kelly Mahmoud/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Marks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deirdre McCaffrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McCormick/Enron@EnronXGate, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McSherry/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Melodick/Enron@EnronXGate, Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette Miroballi/Enron@EnronXGate, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shahnaz Lakho/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Judy Martinez/Enron@EnronXGate, Jesus Melendrez/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael L Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Veronica Montiel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kenneth Krasny/Enron@EnronXGate, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Neyman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko/Enron@EnronXGate, Ozzie Pagan/Enron@EnronXGate, Rhonna Palmer/Enron@EnronXGate, Anita K Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura R Pena/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Peyton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Pizzolato/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Quick/Enron@EnronXGate, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert W Rimbau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Rios/Enron@EnronXGate, Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle Scheuer/Enron@EnronXGate, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Caroline Nugent/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Orellana/ENRON@enronXgate, Michelle Parks/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve Pruett/Enron@EnronXGate, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan Musch/Enron@EnronXGate, Larry Pardue/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tammy R Shepperd/Enron@EnronXGate, Cris Sherman/Enron@EnronXGate, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Simpson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeanie Slone/Enron@EnronXGate, Gregory P Smith/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Smith/Enron@EnronXGate, Will F Smith/Enron@EnronXGate, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Swafford/Enron@EnronXGate, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Valderrama/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/Enron@EnronXGate, Brian Vass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Vetters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allen Wilhite/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wolfe/Enron@EnronXGate, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Zivic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Sontag/Enron@EnronXGate, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shiji Varkey/Enron@EnronXGate, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whiting/Enron@EnronXGate, Becky Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Emily Adamo/Enron@EnronXGate, Jacqueline P Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Alix/ENRON@enronXgate, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Armstrong/Enron@EnronXGate, Veronica I Arriaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susie Ayala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Natalie Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Barber/Enron@EnronXGate, Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wilma Bleshman/Enron@EnronXGate, Dan Bruce/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Burchfield/Enron@EnronXGate, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Betty Chan/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason Chumley/Enron@EnronXGate, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Magdelena Cruz/Enron@EnronXGate, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Walt Appel/ENRON@enronXgate, David Berberian/Enron@EnronXGate, Sherry Butler/Enron@EnronXGate, Rosie Castillo/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher B Clark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patrick Davis/Enron@EnronXGate, Larry Cash/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mathis Conner/Enron@EnronXGate, Lawrence R Daze/Enron@EnronXGate, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/Enron@EnronXGate, Anna M Docwra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth D'Silva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Easley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W Ellerman/Enron@EnronXGate, Allen Elliott/Enron@EnronXGate, Rene Enriquez/Enron@EnronXGate, Soo-Lian Eng Ervin/Enron@EnronXGate, Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Funk/Enron@EnronXGate, Jim Fussell/Enron@EnronXGate, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerri Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Guadarrama/Enron@EnronXGate, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M Harmon/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Harrison/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alton Honore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roberto Deleon/Enron@EnronXGate, Jay Desai/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Hal Elrod/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul Finken/Enron@EnronXGate, Brenda Flores-Cuellar/Enron@EnronXGate, Irma Fuentes/Enron@EnronXGate, Jim Gearhart/Enron@EnronXGate, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Gonzales/NA/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn Graham/Enron@EnronXGate, Thomas D Gros/Enron@EnronXGate, Sam Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGate, Andrew Hawthorn/Enron@EnronXGate, Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher Ducker/Enron@EnronXGate, Jarod Jenson/Enron@EnronXGate, Wenyao Jia/Enron@EnronXGate, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Kinsey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Le/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Duong Luu/Enron@EnronXGate, Shari Mao/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Maxwell/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark McClure/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug McDowell/Enron@EnronXGate, Gregory McIntyre/Enron@EnronXGate, Darren McNair/Enron@EnronXGate, Keith Meurer/Enron@EnronXGate, Jackie Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Neves/Enron@EnronXGate, Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Hylton/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Johnson/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura Johnson/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert W Jones/Enron@EnronXGate, Kara Knop/Enron@EnronXGate, John Letvin/Enron@EnronXGate, Kathy Link/Enron@EnronXGate, Teresa McOmber/NA/Enron@ENRON, James Moore/Enron@EnronXGate, Jennifer Nguyen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, ThuHa Nguyen/Enron@EnronXGate, George Nguyen/Enron@EnronXGate, Reina Mendez/Enron@EnronXGate, Frank Karbarz/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, William May/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John Norden/Enron@EnronXGate, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Powell/Enron@EnronXGate, Phillip C. Randle/Enron@EnronXGate, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew Ries/Enron@EnronXGate, Jose Ruiz/MAD/ECT@ECT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark L Schrab/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Shupak/Enron@EnronXGate, Bruce Smith/Enron@EnronXGate, George F Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Will F Smith/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Solmonson/Enron@EnronXGate, Sai Sreerama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Swaim/Enron@EnronXGate, Janette Oquendo/Enron@EnronXGate, Ryan Orsak/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael K Patrick/Enron@EnronXGate, John Pavetto/Enron@EnronXGate, Catherine Pernot/Enron@EnronXGate, John D Reese/Enron@EnronXGate, Sandy Rivas/Enron@EnronXGate, Sean Sargent/Enron@EnronXGate, Vanessa Schulte/Enron@EnronXGate, Rex Shelby/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey Snyder/Enron@EnronXGate, Joe Steele/Enron@EnronXGate, Omar Taha/Enron@EnronXGate, Diana Peters/Enron@EnronXGate@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Harry Swinton/Enron@EnronXGate, James Post/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mable Tang/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alfonso Trabulsi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Truong/Enron@EnronXGate, Khadiza Uddin/Enron@EnronXGate, Adarsh Vakharia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rennu Varghese/Enron@EnronXGate, Kimberly Vaughn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Weatherstone/Enron@EnronXGate, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Williamson/Enron@EnronXGate, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Wong/Enron@EnronXGate, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Tenney/Enron@EnronXGate, Todd Thelen/Enron@EnronXGate, N Jessie Wang/Enron@EnronXGate, Gwendolyn Williams/ENRON@enronXgate, Dejoun Windless/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeanne Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yarbrough/Enron@EnronXGate, Will Zamer/Enron@EnronXGate, Ned Higgins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Saji John/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Francisco Pinto Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Pamela Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerri Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Louis Allen/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raquel Lopez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:	Enron Center Garage

The Enron Center garage will be opening very soon.

Employees who work for business units that are scheduled to move to the new building and currently park in the Allen Center or Met garages are being offered a parking space in the new Enron Center garage.

This is the only offer you will receive during the initial migration to the new garage. Spaces will be filled on a first come first served basis. The cost for the new garage will be the same as Allen Center garage which is currently $165.00 per month, less the company subsidy, leaving a monthly employee cost of $94.00.

If you choose not to accept this offer at this time, you may add your name to the Enron Center garage waiting list at a later day and offers will be made as spaces become available.

The Saturn Ring  that connects the garage and both buildings will not be opened until summer 2001. All initial parkers will have to use the street level entrance to Enron Center North until Saturn Ring access is available. Garage stairways next to the elevator lobbies at each floor may be used as an exit in the event of elevator trouble.

If you are interested in accepting this offer, please reply via email to Parking and Transportation as soon as you reach a decision. Following your email, arrangements will be made for you to turn in your old parking card and receive a parking transponder along with a new information packet for the new garage.

The Parking and Transportation desk may be reached via email at Parking and Transportation/Corp/Enron or 713-853-7060  with any questions.

(You must enter & exit on Clay St. the first two weeks, also pedestrians, will have to use the garage stairwell located on the corner of Bell & Smith.)


Angie, this is not anything to worry about right now.  When you estimate your
flowing volumes for May, you need to decrease the total volume at Hastings by
3000 dth.  I will try to remind you.

Kim, please send me an AMTEL at 1:00pm on 4/24/2000  "REMIND ANGIE TO REDUCE
HASTINGS BY 3,000 FOR MAY"

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000 07:42
AM ---------------------------
From: Heidi Griffith@EES on 03/08/2000 08:33 AM EST
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G
Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNG-Kriscott

These meters were all at Hastings agg point.

Chris Germany@ECT
03/07/2000 12:39 PM
To: Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G
Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNG-Kriscott

Can you tell me which pools this impacts and how much by pool (hastings,
Bridgeport ...)

To: Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James T Javins/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: CNG-Kriscott

FYI.  I received a letter today from Ed Arnold with Kriscott Inc. stating
that they will be terminating their CNG gas contract effective 5/1/2000.  For
volume purposes, his four meters produced about 3,000 dths a month.  Let me
know if anyone wants a copy of the letter.

Thanks,
HG


We have received a request to change UK power limit from $12.6MM VAR to $35MM. Quite sizeable but I spoke with Richard Lewis and he seemed convinced it was necessary. Do you guys agree? What if it were $20MM? Skilling will definitely ask why such a large increase so I need to have your full support. Rick


(1) - Let's try to make the term consistent with the gas purchase agreement.
The contract number is 12-83789-101 with States Inc., and the term was
initiated on 1/1/98 and runs through 12/31/03.  I am double checking with
Melissa Graves on this.

(2) The MDQ of 500 sounds OK.  I checked with Robert Cook, and the well is
only producing 100/day.  We are also checking with the operator to confirm
future activity.

Eric Gillaspie
06/01/2000 04:40 PM
To: Cheryl Lantz Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Chevron Compression deal

Cheryl,

FYI.  Gerald & I met with Ed Wick at Chevron today and went through the
logistics of the deal.  I believe we had a meeting of the minds & he has
agreed to use our form with some changes that we are fine with.  We have
promised to get him a copy of the new compression deal by early next week.
There are a few changes that Wick desires that are a business decision that
we need confirmation on.  He wants to:
 (1) Change the term from 3 years+evergreen to 2 years+evergreen?
 (2) Is a MDQ of 500 MCF/Day acceptable?  ( He stated that we are currently
flowing 50 MCF/day)

I have made the requested changes to the attached document.  Please review
and forward me your comments as well as confirmation on the 2 questions
above.  That is of course once you return from Boston.............

Hope you had a good trip....and welcome back,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


No.  That's not the gossip.  I probably have you more excited than you should
be now.  It's not as interesting as you're probably thinking now.  I spent
three hours dozing through defensive driving this afternoon.  It's horrible.
They just keep saying the same things over and over.

What time do you think you'll get out of here tonight?  At the rate we're
going I'm never going home.  No one is finished yet.  Talk to ya later.

Gabriel Monroy
12/11/2000 04:40 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: I FINISHED!

I hope the gossip is not about Jennifer  finding out about you know what.  We
did not have Spanish. Even though I am not busy we were kind of determined to
finish fixing the model. We are tired of it.  I am also tired of looking at
it. Did you start watching Defensive Driving?


Please review the home addresss and phone number shown on this eMail.  DO NOT RESPOND if the information is correct.  However, if incorrect then reply to this eMail with the correct information so you HR records can be updated accordingly.  Your home information is important in case the Company needs to forward critical materials to you or contact you regarding important Company information.

Address Line 1: 8002 BROMLEY DRIVE
Address Line 2:
Address Line 3:
City: HOUSTON
State: TX
Country: US
Zip: 77055
Phone: 7137228057