any time in may is fine.  i think i would go home at the end of may so if you
want to go at the end of may that could work.  i am checking today to find
out when grandma and grandpa will come into town.  i will let you know this
week.


How did I turn around and suddenly find myself in December? Why is there a
man parked outside my office incessantly tooting "Jingle Bell Rock" on his
horn? When will I ever see my bare feet again? How annoying is it that I
began this e-mail with lines of whining?

I hope the holidays are at least a somewhat more sincere experience in
Vietnam than they are here. I guess I don't remember this kind of chaos in
years past, but then I'm spending a lot more time in the commercial center of
the city these days. Which, by the way, is going very well. I'm just getting
to the level of familiarity with my new job that allows me time for pointless
e-mails. It's been a steep learning curve, and I still have a long way to go,
but that's what makes everyday interesting.

Other than work, I haven't had time for a whole lot. Thanksgiving was nice -
saw a lot of friends from out of town and had enough meals with the family to
satisfy, but not overwhelm, the quality time scale. Our office had its big
holiday bash last weekend, which I kicked off the night before for no
apparent reason and just continued the festivities for about 48 nonstop
hours. There's snow on the mountain, so this weekend I might have to break in
(or break, whichever comes first) my new snowboard.

Hope all's well on the other side of the world. It's kind of comforting to
remind myself every once in awhile that there is another side, full of people
who could care less about power trading and Portland, Oregon. By the way, I
heard through the grapevine that Clinton was quite a hand-full. Good or bad?
Or ugly?

Shoot me an e-mail when and if you get a chance. I'm out of here on the 22nd,
and it will be so nice to see the sun again. If I don't see you, have a great
vacation, and try not to be overwhelmed by the joyousness of the season.

Kate


Governor wants to cut costs of power
Tough sell for Davis as suppliers balk
By Steve Geissinger
SACRAMENTO BUREAU
SACRAMENTO -- With an economic "perfect storm" and an election looming, Gov. Gray Davis wants to renegotiate several of the state's expensive long-term power contracts -- a move that could translate into a big break for Californians.
But the generators who signed the multibillion-dollar contracts to supply the state will be a tough sell on the notion, even though many have indicated they will at least listen to the state.
"If the politicians were to make all these contracts go away, ... who the hell is going to meet with the state and negotiate any (new) contracts?" asked Peter Cartwright, president of San Jose-based Calpine Corp., a major supplier of California power.
And many experts and analysts are skeptical about Davis' chances of getting generators to substantially lower the price of power they sell to the state, which, in turn, supplies California customers through various utilities.
"Good luck!" former Republican Gov. Pete Wilson sarcastically declared upon hearing of the Democratic governor's plan.
Davis, however, has suddenly thrust the idea of renegotiating some of the costly power-supply contracts to the center of a wildly complex tangle of fiscal, political and legal issues tied to the energy crisis, the ailing economy and their impact on the growing state budget deficit.
The outcome could affect the pocketbooks of energy consumers and taxpayers alike for years, perhaps decades.
"This could save billions of dollars," said Doug Heller of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, one of the consumer groups that has embraced Davis' power contract renegotiation plan.
Barry Goode, Davis' legal affairs secretary, said the administration is "not targeting every contract" because the pacts have been "extremely valuable in keeping the market stable."
The governor's aides refused to reveal which generators they will approach or the arguments they intend to use on the companies, whose contracts don't require them to reopen negotiations with the state.
The governor signed more than 50 long-term contracts -- worth more than $40 billion -- with about two dozen generators at the height of the energy crisis earlier this year.
The state made short-term purchases to supply California after soaring wholesale prices shattered utilities, then entered the longer-term pacts that provide about a third of the state's power demands. The contracts range in duration from a few months to 20 years.
Though the contracts provide power at an average $69 per megawatt-hour over the next decade, the current market has dropped to less than half that rate. And the contracts provide more electricity than the state needs at times, forcing California to sell the excess at multimillion-dollar losses.
The long-term contracts, harshly criticized by Republicans seeking the GOP gubernatorial nomination, have become a political liability for Davis as he heads into a re-election bid next year.
The liability is compounded due to the pacts' potential role in what experts at a recent economic summit at Stanford University termed a brewing "perfect storm" of fiscal calamities.
The state Public Utilities Commission, principally citing a desire for less costly power, has refused to allocate a revenue stream -- generated from recent electricity rate hikes and anticipated bond proceeds -- to finance the long-term contracts.
The standoff has pitted Davis and Democratic state Treasurer Phil Angelides against another of the state's most powerful Democrats, Senate leader John Burton of San Francisco, who sided with the Democratic-controlled PUC.
Burton has called "for Californians to be freed from egregious, unreasonable and expensive provisions contained in these contracts."
The deadlock is holding up a $12.5 billion bond sale intended not only to help fund California's future power costs but repay state coffers for the billions of dollars spent earlier this year on emergency, short-term electricity purchases. It would be the largest municipal debt sale in U.S. history.
Without the bond issue, a projected general fund deficit of up to $14 billion next year could grow to a staggering $20 billion-plus, forcing Draconian cuts in essential government services, according to state finance officials.
The projected deficit of up to $14 billion in California's annual budget of about $100 billion stems from lagging tax revenue in a cooling economy, further chilled by the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the East Coast.
Against the backdrop of fiscal woes, analysts said successful renegotiation of some long-term power contracts could conceivably wind up sparing Californians electricity rate hikes, tax increases or both.
But some analysts are pessimistic, like Wilson. The former governor is widely blamed for legislation that triggered the energy crisis, and yet he in turn blames Davis for not acting quickly enough to head off power woes.
The Western Power Trading Forum, a group representing suppliers and brokers, has made it clear generators will expect the state to give them something substantial in return for any changes in the pacts. Such incentives might include settling disputes over power buys or the state dropping lawsuits against suppliers.
"We're not going to say no. We'd certainly sit down at the table with them and say, 'Let's see, maybe we can do this, maybe we can do that,'" said Calpine's Cartwright.
If state officials simply broke some of their contracts, not only would penalties be "very, very severe," but also "they would have completely blown their credibility, and no one would negotiate with them," Cartwright said.
His comments coincided with reports that Calpine's third-quarter profits more than doubled, despite a sharp drop in short-term electricity prices in California, one of its main markets. Analysts said Calpine's performance can be largely attributed to its long-term contracts with the state.
Heller, one of the state's most vocal consumer advocates, said Davis "is right to look back at the environment in which these contracts were signed and demand that the power companies come to the table and renegotiate, or even throw out many of the contracts."
"Last spring," Heller said, "power companies had a gun to the governor's head and, with staff that already had conflicts of interest, the administration signed some terrible deals."


FYI.  I have sent them a copy of the draft policy.  I think it will address
their concerns.  Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2000 10:44
AM ---------------------------

Sherry Lessner@ENRON
05/11/2000 08:53 AM
To: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/LON/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: EU-US "Safe Harbor" agreement

Jane, this issue continues to be 'worked' here at Enron.  In relation to a
current initiative which includes a new employee directory, we are working
with the business unit leaders (Cindy Olson, Steve Kean, Mark Palmer, Vision
and Values Task Force) and Sharon Butcher, Kelly Higgason, and Brian
Schaffer.  Michelle Cash and Sharon have been involved in several discussions
relating to our global data collection efforts through HR-GIS.  We have a
meeting scheduled next week and I will ask Sharon to include the information
below in the discussion.

In general, I understood Sharon and Kelly to indicated that research has been
done for some locations and may have to be continuously updated.  Other Enron
locations have not been researched and will have to be prioritized and
evaluated for research, i.e., it was recommended that we focus our efforts on
locations with the higher employee populations.

	From:  Jane Allen @ ECT                           05/11/2000 07:49 AM

To: Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Jones@ENRON, Tom Briggs/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sherry Lessner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: EU-US "Safe Harbor" agreement

This has been looked at by our HR IT department for many years as we have
been transmitting data back and forth in our Compensation and HR systems.  I
am copying Sherry Lessner who at one time lead the group dealing with this
issue, as well as Sharon Butcher and Michelle Cash from our legal department.

Ladies, can you provide any additional information on what we are doing?  Do
we need additional research in this area?

Thanks,

Jane

Stephen D Burns@ENRON
05/10/2000 07:29 PM
To: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Jones, Tom Briggs/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: EU-US "Safe Harbor" agreement

Jane:

I participated in a lunch yesterday on Capitol Hill which discussed the
recently concluded bilateral negotiations between Europe and the US on the
issue of data privacy/safe harbor.  I admit that I don't fully understand the
issue, but in essence I'm told it's an internal EU directive passed a few
years ago (not all countries within the EU have come into compliance yet, by
the way) that has strict bearing on issues pertaining to the protection of
the privacy of transmitted data (eg, over the internet).   The EU wants to
forbid transmitting certain types of data to countries that don't "adequately
protect" the information.  As always, the EU wants to regulate the issue,
while the US prefers self-regulation.  After two years of negotations, they
agreed a few weeks ago that data transmitted from the EU to the US could be
put in "safe harbors", which are basically approved bodies that would check
the recipient's ability to protect the privacy of the information, ie, an
American company receiving privelaged data from its European affiliates or
offices.

How does this affect Enron?  A couple of other company reps said it is
especially pertinent to HR issues, such as transmitting personnel
information, salary, etc. from Europe back to the home office in the US.

Given our large presence in London and elsewhere in Europe, does this affect
us, and do you want us to track down more information?

Regards,
Steve Burns


It sounds like someone is working hard and making the company lots of $.

Where the hell do you come up with this shit?

BRIAN HOSKINS@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
02/20/2001 09:18 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@ENRON, Timothy
Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Zachary McCarroll/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James
Wininger/NA/Enron
cc:
Subject:

Box Score Banter
The following question and statistical numbers come via J.C. Corrigan of
Richmond, Va.

He asks:

"Which conference is best? Pac -0? ACC? SEC? Big 10? Big 12? Big East? Using
the RPI, I evaluated the top eight teams in each conference (ACC is the
smallest in terms of members, and I threw out their "Russian judge" team).
If you were to add these individual team RPI up, the least sum would
indicate the greatest depth:

Big Ten, 178; SEC, 194; Big East, 246; Big 12, 278; ACC, 369; Pac-10, 382.

Now some may argue that you should not count the bottom teams, since half
are forced into a losing record. Others say, only one team can win, so why
concern yourself with the bottom feeders? To refute that, here's what the
sums look like using only the top four teams from each conference:

SEC, 40; Pac-10, 41; ACC, 48; Big Ten, 49; Big East, 66; Big 12, 69.

If indeed each conference has their bottom feeders, then we want to make
sure there are no "gimmies" for those teams on top. So what's the RPI rating
of the lowest team in each conference?

SEC, 103 (LSU); Big Ten, 135 (Northwestern); Big 12, 157 (Texas Tech); Big
East, 167 (Virginia Tech); ACC, 168 (Clemson) Pac-10, 173 (Washington State)

Others will argue that we should include each team and then "normalize"
based on the number of teams per conference. This will also account for the
small differences between teams and reward second-tier team strength. Here
are the conferences with their average RPI and median RPI.

SEC (39.1, 38.5), Big Ten (39.4, 29.0), Big East (45.2, 49.0), ACC (59.7,
35.0), Big 12 (66.7, 47.0), Pac-10 (70.8, 55.0).

This data clearly shows how "top heavy" the ACC, Big 12 and Pac-10 are. But
who's the best? When evaluating where each conference ranks across the these
five categories:

SEC: 2-1-1-1-3 8

Big Ten: 1-4-2-2-1 10

Big East: 1-5-4-3-4 17

ACC: 5-3-5-4-2 19

Big 12: 4-6-3-5-4 22

Pac-10: 6-2-6-6-6 26

The SEC has a slight edge over the Big Ten, but some may say the RPI is
biased. So how would these numbers hold up using the Sugaring Ratings?

SEC: 10

Big 10: 11

ACC: 12

Big 12: 20

Pac-10: 22

Big East: 29

Personally, I think the RPI is a little more accurate. Hope you found this
interesting in my attempt to answer the oldest question in the NCAA book.
Ideally, I would like to include head-to-head competition and run these
numbers, but I'm an amateur and I don't that much time on my hands."
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Sam,

Minor corrections.

Vince


We thought you might be interested in this ISIS press release regarding the compound we are developing with ISIS for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

 - ISIS 3521 - AACR.NCI.EORTC Meeting - 10.29.doc


I am planning a trip to BA from Feb. 27 - March 3.  The objective will be to
present derivatives training for the BA traders, meet with tax and legal
representatives and the Argentine Derivatives Association with respect to
changing tax laws, legislation, and "local" derivatives trading, and sitting
down with Mike Guerriero to establish an "action plan".  The monthly swap
calendar does not indicate other lawyers out of the office during that week.
Please note this on the group calendar.  Thanks.  Sara

P.S.  Mark - let me know if there are other issues you would like to have
addressed.


Sorry I left you off the first distribution.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:47 AM
To:	New, James
Subject:	UK & Continental Power Doorstep

James,

Just a quick note and request regarding our UK & Continental Power Doorstep review we will be performing.  Please provide a list of books, curves and deal types used for UK & Continental Power.  In addition, please send information on any large, structured, out of the norm transactions and any transactions that are calculated outside of the core trading system.

Please provide this information early next week.  Look forward to seeing you.

Stacey


Please reserve a conference room for the people listed above at 3:00 PM,
tomorrow.  Mr. Javins will be present via conference call.

thanks


Who do you think?

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 11:52 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	05/02/2001 10:15 AM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Alcoa

Mary and Sara:
Alcoa keeps sending us lists of their authorized traders.  I sent them our
form letter several months ago.  Could you please reassign this to someone?
Susan Bailey has the file.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


FYI

Bob

>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:05:55 -0700
>From: "Holly A. Senn" <has@mrwassoc.com>
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-DIAL  (Win95; I)
>X-Accept-Language: en
>To: <rbw@mrwassoc.com>
>Subject: [Tech] Enron {01}
>X-MDRcpt-To: tech@mrwassoc.com
>X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.1.41
>Sender: BadMsgQ@mrwassoc.com
>X-Return-Path:
>X-MDMailing-List: Tech@mrwassoc.com
>X-MDSend-Notifications-To: [trash]
>X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rbw@mrwassoc.com
>
>Bay Guardian article featuring ENRON , 9/6/2000
>
>Slick oil: George W. Bush's toxic money pipeline.
>
>                             By Pratap Chatterjee
>
>                             EARLY LAST OCTOBER, every member of a ninth
>grade girls
>                             track team and the freshman the football
>team at suburban
>                             Houston's Deer Park High School's north
>campus returned from
>                             practice reporting severe breathing
>problems. That day Deer Park
>                             registered 251 parts of ozone per billion,
>more than twice the
>                             federal standard, and Houston surpassed Los
>Angeles as the
>                             smoggiest city in the United States.
>
>                             One of the biggest sources of Deer Park's
>pollution is a plant
>                             owned by Enron, Houston's wealthiest company
>d and the single
>                             largest contributor ($555,000 and counting)
>to the political
>                             ambitions of Texas Governor and Republican
>presidential
>                             nominee George W. Bush. Kenneth Lay, the
>chief executive of
>                             Enron, has personally given over $100,000 to
>Bush's political
>                             campaigns, more than any other individual.
>He is one of Bush's
>                             "Pioneers" d elite fund-raisers who have
>collected at least
>                             $100,000 in direct contributions of $1,000
>or less for "Dubya."
>
>                             Enron is best known as the largest buyer and
>seller of natural gas
>                             in the country. Its 1999 revenues of $40
>billion make it the 18th
>                             largest company in the United States. Enron
>is invested in energy
>                             projects around the world including the UK,
>Argentina, Bolivia,
>                             Brazil, the Philippines, Indonesia, China,
>India and Mozambique.
>
>                             The company has recently expanded from
>energy to "bandwidth"
>                             capacity for the Internet, making it one of
>the world's largest
>                             Internet-based trading companies, buying and
>selling a dizzying
>                             array of products ranging from pulp and
>paper to petrochemicals
>                             and plastics, as well as esoteric products
>like clean air credits that
>                             utilities purchase to meet emission limits.
>
>                             Texas activists say that this tight
>connection between Bush and
>                             Lay bodes ill for the country, if Bush is
>elected. Andrew Wheat,
>                             from Texans for Public Justice, a campaign
>finance advocacy
>                             group in Austin, compared the symbiotic
>relationship between
>                             Enron and the Governor to "cogeneration"-a
>process used by
>                             utilities to harness waste heat vented by
>their generators to
>                             produce more power. "In a more sinister form
>of cogeneration,
>                             corporations are converting economic into
>political power," Wheat
>                             explained. "A Bush election fueled by Enron
>dollars could fill the
>                             White House with dangerous levels of Enron
>gas. When that gas
>                             ignites in the public-policy arena,
>consumers will get burned." .
>
>                             Indeed Bush campaign spokesman Ray Sullivan
>said that, if
>                             elected president, the governor is keen to
>promote the kind of
>                             policies that he has crafted with companies
>like Enron for the state
>                             of Texas. "The governor believes in
>competition, free enterprise,
>                             better service and technology improvements.
>He has promoted
>                             sweeping and effective reforms in education
>and has been the first
>                             governor in Texas to seriously address
>limits on emissions. He will
>                             carry his agenda to Washington to do what he
>believes is best for
>                             the country."
>
>                             But is what Bush believes is good for Texas,
>good for the United
>                             States Of America? Texas has one of the
>worst environmental
>                             records in the country, particularly in air
>pollution. Unfortunately, the
>                             Bush platform for the country is very
>similar to the kinds of
>                             programs that he has worked on with Enron d
>cutting corporate
>                             taxes, deregulating industry and replacing
>social programs with
>                             private sector volunteerism.
>
>                             In addition Enron is invested in energy
>projects around the
>                             globe-some of which have been tainted by
>charges of human
>                             rights abuses. In India construction of
>Enron's controversial Dhabol
>                             power plant has brought charges by
>international groups like
>                             Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International
>of complicity with
>                             police brutality in rural communities. And
>according to
>                             California-based Amazon watch, Enron is
>charged with human
>                             rights violations in Bolivia, where it is
>building a major gas pipeline
>                             threatening indigenous communities and the
>rainforest
>                             environment.
>
>                             Special deals
>
>                             The Enron Methanol plant in Pasadena, Texas
>lies in the Houston
>                             Ship Channel area, the nation's largest
>concentration of
>                             petrochemical plants just east of the city.
>The Enron Methanol plant
>                             has won special concessions from Governor
>Bush allowing the
>                             company to pollute without a permit, as well
>as giving the company
>                             immunity from prosecution for violating the
>law. Indeed, plants like
>                             this in Texas actually emit twice as many
>nitrogen oxides, a key
>                             ingredient of smog, as do all the nine
>million cars in Texas put
>                             together.
>
>                             Only seven percent of the more than 3,500
>tons of nitrogen oxide
>                             emitted by the Enron Methanol plant in 1997
>were permitted.
>                             Enron got away with this under the
>"grandfather clause" of the
>                             1971 Texas Clean Air Act which allows plants
>built before 1971 to
>                             continue their polluting practices. Governor
>Bush extended this
>                             clause under the 1999 Clean Air
>Responsibility Enterprise
>                             (CARE) program that his office drew up in a
>series of secret
>                             meetings with representatives of the top
>polluters in the state.
>                             CARE waives permit requirements for plants
>that volunteer to cut
>                             emissions.
>
>                             The CARE program is backed up by an act that
>Bush signed in
>                             May 1995 giving sweeping protections to
>polluters who perform
>                             internal environmental or safety audits. The
>law makes these audit
>                             documents confidential from the public and
>allows polluters to
>                             escape responsibility for environmental
>violations. To date Enron
>                             has conducted five such audits and filed for
>immunity from
>                             prosecution for violations of the law,
>according to the Texas
>                             Natural Resources Conservation Commission
>(TNRCC), the state
>                             equivalent of the Environmental Protection
>Agency.
>
>                             Tamara Maschini, who lives about five miles
>from the Enron plant
>                             is one of the founders of a local
>environmental group called Clean
>                             Air Clear Lake. "Whole families in this
>neighborhood have asthma
>                             because of the pollution from plants like
>Enron," she says. "It's
>                             gotten so bad that NASA has a problem
>recruiting people to work
>                             here at Mission Control which is just down
>the road. Houston is in
>                             trouble and George Bush is the reason d he
>has allowed the
>                             situation to deteriorate over the past
>several years," according to
>                             Maschini.
>
>                             Mark Palmer, head of public relations for
>Enron, says that the
>                             company's contribution to local pollution is
>minimal. "If the
>                             grandfather clause was canceled right now,
>we would benefit the
>                             most of any of the companies in Texas
>because our nitrogen oxide
>                             emissions add up to less than half a percent
>of the total," he said.
>
>                             Neil Carman, a former employee of the Texas
>Air Control Board,
>                             who now works for the Sierra Club, agrees
>that Enron's
>                             grandfathered nitrogen emissions add up to
>less than one percent
>                             of the total for all of Texas. However, he
>points out that Enron
>                             Methanol plant alone contributes 3.6% of the
>nitrogen oxide
>                             emissions from the nearly 250 stationary
>sources of pollution for
>                             the city of Houston d the equivalent of
>152,500 cars.
>
>                             What's more, he says that Enron is simply
>paying lip service to the
>                             Bush proposal to cut pollution at grand
>fathered plants. "Enron
>                             showed up at the governor's press conference
>to volunteer for the
>                             CARE program but they have been missing in
>action ever since.
>                             They haven't even bothered to file their
>voluntary plan."
>
>                             Giving and receiving
>
>                             If environmental regulators wanted to speak
>to Enron's senior
>                             officials about the missing voluntary
>program, they would be well
>                             advised to follow the presidential candidate
>around as he is often
>                             chaperoned by Enron officials.
>
>                             On April 7, 2000, Ken Lay, Enron's chief
>executive, played host to
>                             Bush junior and his father, former president
>George Bush, at the
>                             Houston Astros' first home game of the
>season at the baseball
>                             team's brand new stadium d Enron Field d
>which was built with the
>                             help of a $100 million donation from Enron.
>(The company got free
>                             advertising, a tax break and a $200 million
>dollar contract to
>                             supply power to the stadium in return.) Less
>than three weeks later
>                             Lay joined Bush in Washington DC for a
>Republican fund-raiser
>                             that topped all previous records by bringing
>in a staggering $21.3
>                             million, easily the biggest one-night haul
>for any political party in
>                             history.
>
>                             That's not all. Lay makes sure that the Bush
>presidential campaign
>                             has access to other Enron facilities. Last
>year the Bush campaign
>                             borrowed Enron's corporate jets eight times
>to fly aides around the
>                             country, more times than any of the 34 other
>companies that made
>                             their company aircraft available to the
>presidential hopeful. (Under
>                             federal law, campaigns must reimburse
>companies for
>                             transportation, typically at the cost of a
>first-class ticket so Enron
>                             received $25,000 from the Bush campaign for
>this favor).
>
>                             Lay's ties to Bush junior begin with his
>father, former President
>                             George Bush, who was also a recipient of
>Enron/Lay's financial
>                             largesse. Like his son now, Bush senior was
>also happy to return
>                             the favor, appointing Lay to the President's
>Export Council from
>                             1991 to 1993.
>
>                             When asked about the relationship between
>the two men, Ray
>                             Sullivan, a spokesman for the Bush campaign,
>chose his words
>                             carefully. "Ken Lay is a noted business
>leader in Texas who has
>                             long been active in Republican politics. He
>is chair of the
>                             Governor's Business Council. But the
>governor has his own
>                             agenda based on what he believes is best for
>Texas and for the
>                             country."
>
>                             Lay toed a similar line when recently
>interviewed by the New York
>                             Times. "When I make contributions to a
>candidate, it is not for
>                             some special favor, it's not even for access
>d although I'll be the
>                             first to admit it probably helps access. It
>is because I'm supporting
>                             candidates I strongly believe in
>personally." Indeed both Lay and
>                             Enron are generous contributors to local and
>national politicians
>                             wherever they do business, often following
>the long standing
>                             corporate practice of funding candidates on
>both sides of the
>                             election.
>
>                             According to campaign records, Enron and Lay
>have contributed
>                             to Democrats as diverse as Texas Land
>Commissioner Garry
>                             Mauro, U.S. Rep. Richard Gephardt of
>Missouri and Texas House
>                             Speaker Gib Lewis. In 1984, Lay was Harris
>County chairman of a
>                             $1,000-a-plate Reagan-Bush fund-raiser,
>while at the same time
>                             co-chairing a fund-raiser for U.S. Sen.
>Lloyd Bentsen, the vice
>                             presidential candidate on the opposing
>ticket.
>
>                             Bush delivers just the kind of results that
>Lay wants. Candidate
>                             Bush says he will "work with local
>jurisdictions using market-based
>                             solutions and not try to sue our way or
>regulate our way to clean air
>                             and water." He proposes allowing industries
>to voluntarily police
>                             themselves, just like he did for Enron and
>the other polluters in
>                             Texas.
>
>                             Texas has regularly ranked as the most
>environmentally polluted
>                             states in this country for years. According
>to the Environmental
>                             Defense Fund, Texas has the worst record of
>all 50 states in air
>                             pollution, water pollution, overall toxic
>releases, recognized
>                             carcinogens in the air, suspected
>carcinogens in the air,
>                             developmental toxins in the air (affecting
>brain and
>                             nervous-system development in children) and
>cancer risk.
>
>                             While it is true that Texas was the most
>polluted state in the
>                             country before George W. Bush became
>governor, the reason it
>                             has stayed that way is simple: Bush's
>policies have effectively
>                             allowed these industries to continue to
>pollute through a system of
>                             voluntary compliance.
>
>                             Read the fine print
>
>                             Ken Lay and Enron's political beliefs
>overlap with candidate Bush
>                             in other arenas such as education. For
>example on August 20,
>                             2000 the Houston Astros will host a book
>drive at Enron Field to
>                             promote one of George W Bush and Enron's
>favorite charities d
>                             the Reach Out And Read (ROAR) literacy
>program.
>
>                             Launched in 1998, by Laura Welch Bush, the
>governor's wife, the
>                             program calls for physicians and nurse
>practitioners to give free
>                             culturally appropriate books to their
>pre-school age patients at
>                             every checkup. Enron also regularly
>volunteers its employees to
>                             read to children in area clinics and
>conducts book drives. The cost
>                             to Enron for this five year publicity
>program was $400,000.
>
>                             Susan Cooley, the director of Texas ROAR,
>was gushing in her
>                             support for the company, the governor and
>his wife. "I've been a
>                             nurse for 25 years. I don't know anything
>about sponsorship or
>                             advertising. But at Enron they have whole
>departments to do this,
>                             so finding a corporate sponsor has been a
>godsend," she said.
>
>                             However Enron is less than supportive of
>schools that do not
>                             provide similar public relations
>opportunities. And its political
>                             reach goes beyond the governor's mansion.
>Some 20 miles north
>                             of the company's headquarters in Houston
>Enron has effectively
>                             cut approximately $225,000 from the annual
>budget of the Spring
>                             school district, one of Houston's ethnically
>diverse, poorer
>                             suburbs. Spring, Texas, sits on top of
>Bammel Field, a huge
>                             underground salt cave, which Enron uses to
>store large quantities
>                             of natural gas. As the largest business in
>Spring, Enron was
>                             required to pay taxes based on the value of
>its property and
>                             mineral holdings on January 1st of each
>year.
>
>                             But under a special 1989 provision Enron and
>other large
>                             business property owners were allowed to
>choose September 1st
>                             as their tax assessment date, when the
>company has less gas
>                             stored in Bammel field. Enron was able to
>reduce its property
>                             taxes by $15 million in 1990, blowing a hole
>in the school districts
>                             budget, according to Katherine Trumbull, a
>tax accountant with the
>                             school district .
>
>                             The Spring school district went to court to
>challenge the new tax
>                             provision as unconstitutional and won at the
>appeals court level.
>                             Enron appealed this decision to the Texas
>Supreme Court. While
>                             the case was pending Enron's Political
>Action Committee (PAC)
>                             and senior executives contributed heavily to
>the election
>                             campaigns of every Republican judges vying
>for seats (all the
>                             members of the Texas Supreme Court are
>elected and may take
>                             money from contributors for the campaign
>expenses). Enron's
>                             employees and PAC doled out $78,700 between
>the seven of the
>                             winning justices in the 1996 campaign
>including more than
>                             $24,000 from Ken Lay personally. The Supreme
>Court justices
>                             ruled unanimously in Enron's favor on May 6,
>1996, a month after
>                             Lay gave Chief Justice Thomas Phillips
>$5,000 for his campaign.
>
>                             "I have nothing against Enron, after all
>they are our biggest
>                             taxpayer. They can afford to pay for good
>lawyers and lobbyists
>                             and we can't," says Trumbull simply. Enron's
>Palmer had no
>                             comment about the tax lawsuit brought by the
>Spring Independent
>                             School District.
>
>                             Enron's global muscle
>
>                             Enron has also courted Bush's help for its
>business abroad. In
>                             March 1997 Lay wrote a letter to Bush, that
>was subsequently
>                             released to the press under Texas open
>records laws, asking him
>                             to contact every member of the Texas
>delegation to explain how
>                             "export credit agencies of the United States
>are critical to U.S.
>                             developers like Enron, who are pursuing
>international projects in
>                             developing countries."
>
>                             These agencies include the Overseas Private
>Investment
>                             Corporation (OPIC), a federal agency which
>provides political risk
>                             coverage and financial support to United
>States companies
>                             investing abroad d including hundreds of
>millions of dollars for
>                             Enron projects in countries from Brazil to
>India. Unfortunately for
>                             communities in these countries Enron's
>investments have had
>                             devastating impact.
>
>                             In India where Enron received $200 million
>in political risk
>                             insurance for the Dabhol offshore oil and
>gas development project
>                             in 1996, the company has been blamed by both
>Human Rights
>                             Watch as well as Amnesty International, for
>financing local police
>                             brutality.
>
>                             Just before dawn on June 3, 1997, police
>stormed the home of
>                             several women in Veldur, a fishing village
>in western state of
>                             Maharashtra, India. "The policemen forcibly
>opened the door and
>                             dragged me out of the house into the police
>van parked on the
>                             road. (While dragging me) the police kept
>beating me on my back
>                             with batons," says Sugandha Vasudev
>Bhalekar, a 24 year old
>                             housewife who was three months pregnant at
>the time of her
>                             arrest, according to Amnesty International.
>"The humiliation meted
>                             out to the other members of my family was
>similar to the way I was
>                             humiliated... my one and a half year old
>daughter held on to me but
>                             the police kicked her away."
>
>                             The only "crime" committed by these women
>was to lead a
>                             peaceful protest against a massive new Enron
>natural gas plant.
>                             An investigative team from Amnesty
>International found that a
>                             number of the women subsequently sustained
>injuries, including
>                             bruising, abrasions and lacerations on arms
>and legs. Several
>                             hundred other peaceful protestors have been
>arrested and
>                             temporarily detained by Indian police since
>December 1996,
>                             according to the report. Meanwhile, a
>January 1999 investigation
>                             by Human Rights Watch revealed that the
>police were directly on
>                             the Enron payroll.
>
>                             Likewise, Enron has been severely criticized
>for the Cuiab?
>                             Integrated Energy Project in Bolivia and
>Brazil, for which it
>                             received US$200 million in insurance from
>OPIC in 1999.
>
>                             On February 4, 2000 an oil pipeline operated
>by Transredes, a
>                             joint venture between Enron and Shell in the
>Cuiab? Integrated
>                             Energy Project, erupted in the Bolivian
>altiplano and dumped an
>                             estimated 10,000 barrels of refined crude
>oil and gasoline into the
>                             Desaguadero River, which supports indigenous
>communities like
>                             the Uru Moratos. Facing starvation from the
>loss of their life-
>                             sustaining waterfowl and fish, the Uru
>Moratos left their ancestral
>                             lands at the southern shores of Lake Poopo
>in April and marched
>                             85 miles to the city of Oruro to ask for
>government help. TK result...
>
>                             'Mutual self-interest'
>
>                             In January 1999 Enron pitched in $50,000 to
>help pay for Bush's
>                             inaugural bash in Austin, Texas, when he won
>the reelection for
>                             governor. If George W. wins this November,
>it is very likely Ken
>                             Lay will be on hand when Bush is inaugurated
>as the next
>                             president of the United States, hoping that
>in return for Lay's
>                             generous campaign Support, Bush will be
>equally generous in his
>                             support for Enron's businesses at home and
>abroad in the future.
>
>                             Craig McDonald, director of Texans for
>Public Justice, says that
>                             the relationship is bound to pay off. "Those
>two have a mutual
>                             self-interest in being buddies. Bush has
>always delivered on Ken
>                             Lay's political pitches. Enron depends upon
>government policies
>                             to enhance their bottom line in lots of
>ways. The company relies
>                             upon this kind of access to government," he
>recently told an
>                             Associated Press reporter.
>
>                             It is people from the Uru Moratas of Bolivia
>to the school children
>                             of Deer Park and Spring, Texas, who will
>ultimately pay the price
>                             through the continued destruction of their
>communities and
>                             environment.
>
>                             This story was made possible by the
>Corporate Watch Fund
>                             for Investigative Journalism.
>
>--
>Holly A. Senn
>Senior Information Specialist
>MRW & Associates
>1999 Harrison St., Ste. 1440
>Oakland, CA 94612
>p: 510.834.1999
>f: 510.834.0918
>e: has@mrwassoc.com


Please do not forward this message to anyone.  This email articulates the frustration that we have had with EES since the very beginning of this year.  Per your recommendation for pricing, we contacted Don Black who forwarded us to Sean Holmes who forwarded us to Richard Zdunkiewicz.  Chris is meeting with Richard this morning, but I am highly doubtful of its effectiveness.

Like Chris, I am tired of communicating with a lot of VPs who are not accountable for their business.  I do not understand why EES does not see the value in capturing the tolling spread between gas and power.  Compressor load is much more manageable than their standard retail customer.

If need be, should I go talk to Delainey? Whalley?  I am trying to be patient, but I want to close some compression deals this quarter.

Regards, Mrha
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hilgert, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:35 AM
To:	Mrha, Jean
Subject:	FW: Compression Deals - Meeting Scheduled
Importance:	High

Jean,

Per your request, here is the e-mail that showed up in my inbox without even a phone calle to Lacye or me.  I was specifically told by Scott Gahn that he had talked to Dave Delainey and Janet Deitrich about involving EES origination in this loop and they agreed that it did not make sense.  We were referred to Jim Wood who we talked to and he responded back to us that he did not believe that EES would be able to work with us as our deals did not fit their new "standardized" pistol.  We then moved to Don Black and you know the rest from there.  We keep having these people show up in our world and I am tired of it because all they do is waste our time and stick their hand out for having done nothing.  John Kiani called Jodi Thrasher (an analyst who he had been working with) to sniff out the purpose of this meeting and she told him that Greg Sharp had called it to determine which people we should be working with per EES' "standard products & services".  This is the absolute last thing I want to do because we are bringing highly valued customers (via centralized predictable loads to manage) that can create significant value for Enron (from more of a wholesale perspective than anything else).  Trying to fit this to EES' standard pistol will kill this business and continue one of the worst relationship/partnerships that I have experienced in my career to date between EES and ECS.  Remember, this is the same group who went so far as to negotiate and put in writing what they could do with Stagecoach for the summer option and then back out two weeks ago which made us look bad in front of TGP and nearly jeopardized the deal.  Bo Barnwell notified the customer without talking to Andrew first.  This is in direct contradiction to what Scott Gahn and Jim Wood told us as well.  Please let us know how you want to handle to get this meeting terminated and get these people out of our life.

Sorry for the long-windedness but I am clearly fed up.  Thanks in advance for your help.  We will be meeting with Richard Zdunkiewicz at 11:00 and we will let you know how that goes.  Let me know how your conversation with Don Black goes.

Thanks,
Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Reynosa, Lily
Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 3:57 PM
To:	Thrasher, Jodi; Barnwell, Bo; Hilgert, Chris; Knippa, Mark; Miles, Andrew
Cc:	Sharp, Greg; Velasco, Xochitl-Alexis
Subject:	Compression Deals - Meeting Scheduled

Date:		Wednesday, May 2

Time:		4:30 - 5:00PM

Place:		EB751

Attendees:	Greg Sharp
		Bo Barnwell
		Jodi Thrasher
		Chris Hilgert
		Mark Knippa
		Andrew Miles


Ruth-

I went ahead and scheduled Kali to do the GSWEC camp the first two sessions.
I've only put the deposit down, so I can get that money back if we decide to
do the Blue Fox Farm camp instead.  Hopefully, we'll have that info the first
week in May.  Marla is planning on signing up Blakely for the second session
there, pending what the Blue Fox Farm schedule looks like.  I think Anna
Edelman is also interested.  I left a message with Sue today letting her know
that I was reserving a spot for Kali at GSWEC just in case the Blue Fox Farm
doesn't work.

Thanks,

Susan


Sounds like some pretty good movement.  Congratz.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:33 PM
To:	Alonso, Tom; Alvarez, Ray; Badeer, Robert; Belden, Tim; Blair, Kit; Calger, Christopher F.; Choi, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Driscoll, Michael M.; Fischer, Mark; Foster, Chris H.; Gang, Lisa; Guzman, Mark; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Heizenrader, Tim; Kaufman, Paul; Mainzer, Elliot; Mallory, Chris; Malowney, John; Mara, Susan; Motley, Matt; Perrino, Dave; Platter, Phillip; Rance, Susan; Rawson, Lester; Richter, Jeff; Rosman, Stewart; Scholtes, Diana; Semperger, Cara; Stokley, Chris; Swain, Steve; Swerzbin, Mike; Symes, Kate; Walton, Steve; Williams III, Bill
Subject:	FW: FERC Meeting Summary
Importance:	High

Today's FERC meeting was a big deal.   Some of the key actions are:

DSTAR and RTO West are to be "married,"  The FERC wants a single western RTO but will wait on making CAISO merge with other western RTOs so that California can "heal its wounds."
Every utility needs to declare which RTO it plans to join by 12/1/01 (or possibly 12/15; not sure of date).  Otherwise the utility will lose market-based rates, will be unable to get a merger approved, and will have its transmission rev req. scrutinized.
The commission favors 1 market structure applied to the four nationwide RTOs.   It plans on holding a week of workshops and issuing a NOPR to determine this structure.  The goal is to essentially re-issue the Order 888 tariff in a form that encompases the new functions of RTOs.  Although consistent business rules applied to large geographic markets are a good thing, expect this new effort and redefining the RTO to delay ultimate implementation.
Although California will be allowed to heal, it is ordering an operational audit of the Calfornia ISO.
Separately the FERC indicated the plan to issue a NOPR on market power and market based rates.   Expect new rules and procedure to determine whether a market is sufficiently competitive to allow for market based rates.

Further summary, prepared by Sarah Novosel in our Govt. Affairs DC office, is provided below:

Alan Comnes

The Commission held its first open meeting with Pat Wood as the new Chairman today and discussed many interesting issues.  The following is a summary of the meeting.  The meeting is still going on, and we will provide an addendum to this email updating you on what was discussed this afternoon (regarding market power).

RTOs

Chairman Wood expressed his desire to finish the RTO transition, and that the Commission needs to provide guidance and leadership in order to speed up the RTO transition.  Chairman Wood considers the RTO effort on two tracks:  1) organizational -- what will the RTO organizations look like, and 2) substantive -- once you set up the organizations, what will they do.

Organizational Effort:  Wood stated that this effort has already begun with the July 12 orders and the Northeast and Southeast mediation efforts.  The Commission will be issuing additional orders in the northeast, southeast and Midwest within the next couple of FERC meetings.  Wood also stated that it is time for RTO West and Desert Star to "marry up," meaning, I suppose, that the two should consolidate.  Wood does not think that California can be included in the western RTO yet since it has lingering problems.

Structural Effort:  The Commission will initiate a section 206 proceeding to address market design and structure issues in order to translate the 8 functions established in Order No. 2000 into RTO structures.  To achieve this goal, the Commission is establishing an "RTO week" of advanced workshops, from October 15-19, in advance of issuing a NOPR, to address structural issues such as:  congestion management; cost recovery; market monitoring; transmission planning; reliability; transmission rights.  Wood also envisions that the Commission will develop a new pro forma tariff to replace the existing Order No. 888 transmission tariff.  The new tariff will apply to all public utilities and RTOs.

Wood also recognized that some "sticks" are needed to entice RTO participation.  Therefore, Wood proposes to have all public utilities come in by December 15, 2001 with a declaration to join an RTO.  If they do not make this declaration, these entities will have their market based rate authority revoked on a prospective basis.  Furthermore, Wood states that if entities do not join RTOs, they should not be authorized to merge their facilities, and that FERC will also look at their rates to determine whether they are still just and reasonable rates compared with rates offered by RTOs.  Wood states that these "sticks" provide incentive, but do not mandate, RTO participation.

With regard to the pending requests for rehearing, Wood asked legal staff to figure out how "FERC can get there."  In other words, I think Wood is telling them to develop the legal analysis for denying rehearing.

While Commissioner Breathitt is skeptical about some of these RTO proposals, because she was not required to vote on anything today, she only expressed her concern.

Upcoming Dates

	October 15-19 --	RTO Workshops
	End of October -- further orders on Northeast, Southeast, Midwest RTOs
	December 15, 2001 -- all public utilities must commit to an RTO or have their market based rates revoked

Proposed Rule for Standards of Conduct

Within the next few days, FERC will be issuing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("NOPR") on standards of conduct for transmission providers.  As explained at the meeting (we do not have a copy of the NOPR yet), the NOPR will propose to apply standards of conduct uniformly to electric transmission providers and gas pipeline transportation providers similarly.  The NOPR also proposes to broaden the definition of affiliate to include all energy affiliates, not just marketers.  The standards of conduct would not apply to RTOs and transmission providers who are members of an RTO may ask for an exemption from the standards.

The NOPR will also likely include a proposal that the standards apply to transmission-owners' marketing affiliates that are serving native load customers.  As you know, the present standards do not apply to the affiliates of TOs that are only buying and selling power for native load customers.  As the interim general counsel noted, these marketing affiliates can go into the control room and have unrestricted interaction with the TO.

There was some discussion of whether it is necessary to apply the standards to affiliates serving native load.  Staff told the Commissioners that market participants have been complaining for years about this loop hole in the rules.  Pat Wood said they will include the proposal in the NOPR (Breathitt may not support), but if the industry does not support the proposal, FERC will pull it.  We of course will strongly support the proposal.

Provision of Adequate Electrical Capacity (ICAP)

Chairman Wood asked Staff to prepare a presentation on reserves and installed capacity requirements.  Wood noted that the Commission had to issue an order on ICAP in New England during their recess in August, and he is not that familiar with the issues.  Therefore, he asked Staff to prepare a presentation, which they made at the meeting this morning.  The presentation will be made public within the next couple of days.  In sum, Staff seems to believe that some type of ICAP requirement is needed for reliability.

After the presentation, Wood noted that the New England ICAP order has enough wiggle room to allow the Commission to change its mind once the commissioners better understand the issue.  Wood sees that there is a potential conflict between decentralized, competitive markets and the need for sufficient supply (without politically unacceptable, prolonged price spikes).

Commissioner Brownell (from the Pennsylvania PUC) has a better understanding of  ICAP and expressed concerns that ICAP may be an outdated tool that acts as a barrier to entry without any definable benefit to customers.

Realizing that there are many positions on this topic, Chairman Wood said he will publish the Staff report and ask for comments by October 17.  We will definitely submit comments on this and will include everyone in the drafting process.

Sorry this is so long, but a lot happened today.  We will provide a summary of the market power discussion as soon as it is over.  Let us know if you have any questions.

Sarah


Chris,
I've got calls into the counterparty that has been buying our TW gas month-to-month.
I don't have any market information to work the transaction.  I need to either have
someone sell this gas on ECS's behalf or to provide me with a market perspective.
I've got a few others that I'll approach about purchasing this gas.  Any ideas or
contacts for West Texas or Permian gas?

mk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wise, Jack
Sent:	Monday, April 22, 2002 2:56 PM
To:	Fernandez, Justin; Knippa, Mark; Wise, Jack; Peoples, Dexter; Dhont, Margaret; Moseley, Debbie
Subject:	Transwestern Nominations - May 2002

All,

The nomination volumes for Transwestern (for ECS, LLC) gas volumes are below.  Please contact me if you have any questions.

TW Volumes May 2002

Bisti  		 93,197
Bloomfield	125,423
Gallup		119,976
Total		338,595

Daily Volume	  10,922

Thanks-
Jackson Wise
ext. 57882


>X-Sender: awukasch@mail.shelton.org
>Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:08:13 -0500
>To: Sharon Snyder <ssnyder@shelton.org>
>From: Ann Wukasch <awukasch@shelton.org>
>Subject: Re: Picture night!
>
>I know she wants to meet him!  I'm surprised she didn't call
>back....I'm not making excuses for her - but she does get super busy
>at work - like I'm sure Will did when he worked for V&E - she pulls
>all nighters and all that.  Yes, I'll call her tonight and tell her
>to be expecting a call.  The best place to catch her is probably at
>work.

--
Sharon Snyder
ssnyder@shelton.org


That job is with Bob Williams, the litigation attorney for our international
company.  Bob is a great guy, probably one of the funniest people I have ever
known.  It also might be a good job for you because he promoted his last
administrative assistant to paralegal.

	"Patti Young" <pyoung@pdq.net>
	09/20/2000 11:51 AM

		 To: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: An Update

Thanks for writing back.  I could probably do the Saturday evening thing.  I
will let you know soon.

If you get a chance, check out Job No. 105738.  Know anything about it??

----- Original Message -----
From: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: An Update

>
> I was just about to call you when I got your email.  Holly called and she
> has a table to fill at an awards banquet (some women's professional group
> or something) and wants to know if you want to join us.  A bunch of her
> girlfriends are going, me, Lucinda, I think Carol....anyway, it's Saturday
> night at 7:00 pm.  She said it should be really boring (so I put it on my
> calendar as "boring awards banquet"), but with all the girls at one table
> we'll misbehave and have fun.  I hope you can join us.  Let me know and
> I'll reserve you a spot w/Holly.
>
> The thing on your house and townhome sounds exciting.  When can I see it?!
>
>
>
>                     "Patti Young"
>                     <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     "Tana Jones"
<Tana.Jones@enron.com>
>                     et>                  cc:
>                                          Subject:     Re: An Update
>                     09/18/2000
>                     05:44 PM
>
>

>
>
>
>
> The name of the plant I told you about last week is DURANTA.
>
> Think you will want it??
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tana Jones <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
> To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 8:28 AM
> Subject: An Update
>
>
> >
> >
> > That job I passed on your resume to in our group, I checked, and they
> still
> > haven't started interviewing people yet, since Barbara is on vacation
> dropping
> > her daughter off at college.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


Second anthrax-tainted letter, intended for Democratic senator, found in Va. postal facility.

http://www.abcnews.go.com

ABCNEWS.com:  Up to the Moment, Up to You (tm)
http://abcnews.go.com
---
You received this mail because you subscribed via ABCNEWS.com. If you would like to stop receiving these mailings, log into our mailcenter at http://login.mailpref.go.com/unsubscribe .

Please do not respond to this mail. Questions or comments can be submitted at
http://abcnews.go.com/service/help/abccontact.html


Please double check the Capacity number when you use Mark Bernstein's model.
Matthew Gimble and I found out that when you click ISO, the model actually
spits out 95 degrees MW, and vice versa.

Please call me if you have questions.


Hey there everyone.

I just wanted to let you all know that I bought a house, and I will be moving
March 1st.  Once I am all settled in, I will have a house warming party for
all of you.

My new address will be:

Elizah Mayham
31369 SW Chia Loop
Wilsonville, OR 97070

My new phone number will be 503-682-8061

Drop me a line :)


TOO COOL


Rod,
    What is going on?  Every day there is something new, different, and bad about us. Now, the rumor in Houston is that we are filing Ch. 11 on Monday. Is everything out, or is there more to come (Kilmer is about ready to blow an artery)?  Still views that Mark is out, Greg is temporary, and Stan is here for the Company for better or worse. What do you hear?

Dan
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


1) When using the "loss matrix", use Source and Sink.

2)  MAPP will consider placing examples of tags on the wed site.  I don't
expect this to happen soon so my suggestion would be to work directly w/ MAPP
personnel associated w/ this project :    Tom White 651-632-8407 ,  Bill
Tate  651-632-8403 or Bill Kunkel  651-632-8573.

3)  Don't worry yourself about "sink" scheduling participant.  JUST REMEMBER,
THE SOURCE or POR is the scheduling participant responsible for our Schedule
F requests.


don't be surprised if i ask you guys to take off that friday, too, so that we
can be a little flexible with Bob. R.

	"Herman, David (Nick)" <David.Herman@tvland.com>
	02/09/2001 01:36 PM

		 To: "'Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com'" <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE:

Howdy J.R.

I think that the weekend of April 7-8 is good for the two of us. I will
check with the wife and let you know. I can't wait to check out your digs
and for the Shari flip-out moment, meeting Rauschenburg. Talk to you soon.

> ----------
> From:    Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
> Sent:    Friday, February 9, 2001 2:06 PM
> To:    david.herman@tvland.com
>
> Hi Dave.  As a follow up to out conversation, I found out Robert
> Rauschenburg will be here April 5 or 6 and the weekend (April 7-8).  See
> how that looks on the calendar for y'all yankees to visit down here in
> rodeoland.  (I did go to the rodeo last night--hosted a big party--and
> wore
> my boots, and a cowboy hat my group gave me--pictures to follow)
> Can you believe I went to the Rodeo?
>
> Jeff "J. R." Shankdaddy
>
>


link -->

I'll be right up...

Mike


Hello,

I hope everyone had a special holiday.  Regarding Westpark, there is NO
CREDIT RISK...
Historically, the customer places limit orders and stop loss orders with Jim
Schwigger for NYMX related NG contracts.  Activity is not heavy and trade
volume is usually limited to a Bcf or less.  We currently hold $1.5MM in cash
as security on a static position.
January - is off the board.  Enron owes them $6.6MM.
February - has no open volumes.  All positions have been unwound.
March - has no open volumes.  All positions have been unwound.
The issue at bar (to use a legal term) is management strategy.  What I
proposed and they accepted was $300M for each Bcf open.  Recognizing the fact
that (i) this is a one man shop and (ii) he (Patrick Locke) is definately
speculating, is $1.5MM enough security.  Probably not.  I have left word with
Patrick and Jim about revisiting our philosophy, but he is willing to provide
collateral and all confirmations are bound by the existing Master Agreement
that contains a $0 credit line.

Recommendation:  We increase the collateral being held from $1.5MM to $2.5MM
and margin them for all amounts postive.  Pursue an amendment to the Master
Agreement that changes the independant amount from $150M to $2.5MM.

That's it.....Move on people...Get a life......

the analyst formerly known as "reves"

From:  Russell Diamond
     12/21/2000 09:15 AM

To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darren Vanek/NA/Enron@Enron, Brant
Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Westpark Var

Tanya,

I have run a VAR on Westpark (see below) and as you can tell the one day VAR,
at the 95 percentile, for current transactions is $2.5MM.  The 5-day VAR is
$5.7MM.
Our current exposure is out of the money $7.1MM, thus a net for this period
is potentialy out of the money $1.4MM.

Thanks
Russell.


FYI.  I haven't received the list.   Did you e-mail it?

Thanks.


ALL FOOD HAS BEEN CANCELED!!!!!!!!!!

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


I'm a bad person.  I forgot to tell you I sold CES 880 to 1000 day at the
pool starting tomorrow on deal 217775

Also, I just sold CES 2500/day at CGLF Mainline starting the 16th-31st, deal
217854.  This gas is for Atistech.  I assume we schedule that.

Joan Veselack@ENRON
03/14/2000 12:58 PM
To: bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT,
ltippet@columbiaenergygroup.com, dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Orwell & Lakeside - Enron IPP

Brian said the deal was done with Chris to use Enron's IPP. This has been
scheduled.

TCO cannot attached Enron's FSS (storage) to Orwell and Lakesides GTS
contracts. TCO could do an inground storage transfer between Enron and these
accounts, however storage withdrawal and injection fees would be charged.

Per my other e-mail... we are on target in getting the total gas withdrawn
from storage for  March. There is no need to do outside deals to get
additional storage gas out of the ground. If you do outside deals, this just
changes the amount of storage that goes to Choice.

Thanks.

bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/14/2000 10:58:19 AM
To: " - *Tippett, Lee" <ltippet@columbiaenergygroup.com>
cc: " - *joan_veselack@enron.com" <joan_veselack@enron.com>

Subject: Re: Orwell & Lakeside

We are using #51407.

Lee Tippett
03/14/2000 11:55 AM

To: joan_veselack@enron.com
cc: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Orwell & Lakeside

Please nominate the following volumes baseload for the rest of March starting
on March 15, 2000:

Using Orwell's contract #37962 please nominate 850/day from the pool you and
Brian Perrone agree upon.

Using Lakeside's contract #37979 please nominate300/day from the pool you and
Brian Perrone agree upon.

Please forward to JoAnne Collins if you would, I don't have her e address.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.


I only had a few changes, see the attached red-line.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert D Morgan/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000
10:43 AM ---------------------------

"Lawrence J. Hand, Jr." <lhand@lemle.com> on 12/12/2000 02:30:12 PM
To: "Gerald Nemec (E-mail)" <gnemec@ect.enron.com>, "Rusty Belflower
(E-mail)" <Rusty.Belflower@enron.com>, "'Robert.d.Morgan@bhlp.com'"
<Robert.d.Morgan@bhlp.com>
cc:
Subject: Bridgeline Storage Co. 24 " pipeline

Gentlemen: enclosed is a draft application to the Louisiana Office of
Conservation for authority to construct and operate pipeline facilities.
Please let me know if you have any comments or questions.  The filing
deadline is Dec. 29.

 <<Application for Authority to Construct --Bridgeline Storage Co..DOC>>

 - Application for Authority to Construct --Bridgeline Storage Co..DOC


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 November 2001 	[IMAGE]

   Mileage Statement   [IMAGE]  Thank you for choosing to receive Continental Airlines OnePass  statement communications electronically. Your latest statement is  now online.  To view your mileage activity since your last statement, log into your account and visit the "Activity Since Your Last Statement" area.  [IMAGE]  To access your new statement, just visit Your Account at:  https://onepass.continental.com/your-account .  If you have any questions regarding your account, please e-mail the  OnePass Service Center at OnePass@coair.com  and make sure to  include your name and OnePass number (ES935566) in your e-mail message.  [IMAGE]  OnePass Brings You More of Europe with New Alliance Partner KLM  [IMAGE]We're pleased to increase your mileage earning and reward travel opportunities with new alliance partner KLM Royal Dutch Airlines.  To celebrate we're offering double miles on KLM flights systemwide. Visit onepass.continental.com  to learn more.

Travel Updates
Be sure to check continental.com  before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!

If you need assistance please visit www.continental.com/service .
View our Privacy Policy
This e-mail was sent to: dgiron@enron.com
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 10:23 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	01/26/2001 02:23 PM

		 To: Dave Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jason R Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA for Clark County PUD #1

Dave,

Attached is the Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement.  The document you
faxed me was the preprinted form of ISDA Master Agreement.  That document,
TOGETHER with the attached Schedule is your full "ISDA Master Agreement".
Also attached to this Schedule is the form of Enron Corp. Guaranty and
proposed form of Legal Opinion to be issued by Clark County PUD #1.

It is my understanding that you will provide these documents directly to the
counterparty.  Again, the whole package above must be provided to the
counterparty or you will not have a complete set of documents.  Call me if
you have any questions.


Brett, got it covered.

thanks
Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/10/2000
12:30 PM ---------------------------

Brett R Wiggs@ENRON
12/09/2000 11:48 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Organizational Changes

Dave:

Is there anything else you need for the meeting and do you need me to attend?

Thanks,
Brett

David W Delainey@ECT
12/08/2000 03:36 PM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Michael
Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Organizational Changes

Guys, I assume that you will have a complete headcount and a revised 2001
expense/revenue/capital budget available in the next week or so.  I would
also like to know what your HR plan might be given these changes.  David
Oxley will the help with the HR issues and Wes Colwell with the budget issues.

No turning back gentlemen.  I look forward to great success in the next year.

Frevert, Whalley, Lavo and myself are sitting down to discuss Electrobolt on
Tuesday morning - subject to that meeting we have approval to go ahead from
Skilling.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000
12:25 PM ---------------------------

	From:  David Delainey, President & CEO Enron Americas @ ENRON
          12/07/2000 11:53 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: ESA_Employees
cc:
Subject: Organizational Changes

On November 8, the Office of the Chairman, issued an important communication,
announcing significant organizational changes in Enron's worldwide
operations. The purpose of this memo is to share with you the decisions that
are underway to restructure  Enron,s operations in South America.  The basic
organizational framework has been set.

As you know, Diomedes Christodoulou and Jim Bannantine will be assuming new
responsibilities within Enron. Replacing them will be Orlando Gonzalez and
Joe Kishkill, who will become the Co-Presidents of South America, reporting
to Dave Delainey and John Lavorato.  They will share overall responsibility;
however, Orlando,s focus will be on direct sales origination,
commercial/government relationships and regulatory issues.  Joe,s focus will
be on wholesale origination, financial and operating performance and overall
country management.  In addition, Orlando will continue as President and CEO
of Elektro until its ultimate sale.

The existing, large integrated asset base in South America (excluding
Elektro) will be managed and operated by Rebecca McDonald and Jim Hughes in
Enron Global Assets, which is part of Enron Wholesale Services under Mark
Frevert. Ultimately, there will be very close coordination in both Brazil and
Argentina between Enron Americas and Enron Global Assets to ensure that our
reputation in South America is protected, our asset positions are being
managed prudently and that commercial opportunities surrounding these assets
are pursued.

The remaining natural gas and electrical commercial activities in South
America will be organized around the highly successful North American network
business model.  This model employs people, market making, physical
commodities, capital and assets to provide reliable, flexible and high-value
products to our customers.  It is people and intellectual capital based and
enjoys high rates of return on invested capital.

In the interest of pursuing this strategy, the following teams will report to
Joe and Orlando:

The Commercial Origination team will be lead by Brett Wiggs.  The team will
focus on covering South American markets, primarily Brazilian and Argentine
natural gas and electricity, with the following goals:

? Generating new, innovative, reliable and high value products and services
needed by the market by utilizing our commodity, asset and capital
capabilities;
? Providing those products and services across South America and across the
value chain, including wholesale and retail, based upon the highest value
opportunity;
? Finding structural value arbitrages in the South American market and move
quickly to capitalize;
? Assisting the Risk Management and Trading organization in managing the
overall risk of the organization;
? Managing all new power and asset development opportunities in South America
consistent with this strategy, and
? Providing the Risk Management and Trading organization information and deal
flow.

The Commercial Origination team will consist of a diverse group of people who
work as a single team which bring the required skills including commodity,
capital, regulatory, asset, development, market, structuring, deal execution,
finance and country knowledge necessary to reach our goals.

The Trading and Risk Management team will be headed by Remi Collonges.  The
team will continue to develop pricing information and manage the price book
for the relevant energy markets in support of the wholesale and direct sales
efforts.  Additionally, the team will work toward implementation of actively
trading South American energy commodities.  This group will be responsible
for managing Enron South America,s overall risk and will have a direct
reporting relationship with John Lavorato in his role as head of the Americas
risk activities.

The Argentine effort will be integrated into the overall South American
Commercial Origination and Trading and Risk Management groups; however, we
will continue to maintain an Argentine office headed by Michael Guerriero.

The goal of the reorganization is to create a flat team oriented organization
that is very market and commercially focused.  The following support
functions will assist the overall business objectives of the commercial team
and will report into Joe and Orlando, plus into their line functions in
Houston.  The overall goal is to ensure that the South American business
units have an adequate support organization to evaluate opportunities, as
well as manage day-to-day business and risk.  Otherwise, the Houston
infrastructure will provide resources as needed to manage peak requirements
in South America, not unlike other businesses in Enron Americas.

These groups include:

The Government Affairs team, which will be headed by Sergio Assad, will
manage the relationships with the relevant regulatory agencies as well as
governmental ministries.  The primary regulatory goal will be to facilitate,
in the near term, substantive changes to the regulatory rules to allow a
functioning wholesale traded market in Brazil and Argentina. Sergio will
assume his responsibilities upon completion of the Elektro sale.  During this
interim period, Jose Bestard will continue to be in charge of the regulatory
function.  Once Sergio makes the transition, he will also report to Rick
Shapiro in Enron Government Affairs.

The Finance team will be headed by Britaldo Soares.  The team will manage the
interface with Enron Global Finance.  Britaldo will transition from his
current duties at Elektro upon completion of the Elektro sale.  Britaldo will
also report to Joe Deffner in Enron Global Finance.  Rob Gay will be
assisting Britaldo during the transition, while continuing his work on the
Cuiaba project.

The Legal team, which will be lead by Randy Young, as general counsel, and
John Novak, as deputy general counsel, will manage South America,s legal
requirements.  Randy and John will also report to Mark Haedicke in Enron
Wholesale Services - Legal Department.

Miguel Padron will become Chief of Staff.  Human Resources, Information
Technology, Treasury, Accounting & Reporting, as well as Administration will
report to Miguel.  This will bring focus to essential, but non-commercial
functions, as well as more efficiently manage key matrix reporting
relationships with Enron.  Miguel will also report to David Oxley in Enron
Wholesale Services ) Human Resources and Wes Colwell in Enron Wholesale
Services ) Business Analysis and Reporting.

These changes are consistent with Enron's evolving business strategy and
reflect our continuing commitment to grow the company by maximizing our
financial and intellectual capital.  However, in line with the new
organizational structure and the near term potential for business in the
region, further budget reductions will be necessary.  People directly
affected will be notified shortly.

Enron is committed to continue the successful implementation of its
businesses in South America.  We believe that as the markets develop, we are
uniquely positioned to leverage Enron,s core capabilities and create
shareholder value.


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 11:58
AM ---------------------------

	From:  George Smith                           11/01/2000 11:23 AM

To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SEXUAL HARASSMENT

Does this bring anybody to mind?
---------------------- Forwarded by George Smith/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 11:22
AM ---------------------------

Charles T Muzzy
11/01/2000 11:10 AM
To: Mark L Schrab/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
rhonda.smith@enron.com
cc:
Subject: SEXUAL HARASSMENT

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles T Muzzy/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
11:09 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Dolores Muzzy                           11/01/2000 09:54 AM

To: Charles T Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SEXUAL HARASSMENT

 - How to discourage harassment in the office.mpg


I am out of the office Friday, October 18.  For immediate assistance, please contact Stephanie Sever at stephanie.sever@enron.com or 713-853-3465.


Caroline:

I haven't spoken with Frank in several days.  You may want to ask Holly (his former assistant) for a number to just say hello.  He seems to be doing a little better each day.  Can we set up a call later today and I'll try to fill you in as much as I can?  There is a developing process and I'll tell you how it is supposed to work.  I have a meeting in at 2:30 Houston time so I'll call you in a few minutes or afterwards.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abramo, Caroline
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 1:02 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	counterparty processes

Sara- I am sorry to hear Frank has left.. have you spoken to him, is he OK? How are you doing?

Can you please tell me how you are dealing with counterparties who still have exposure to Enron?

I know all contracts are null and void.. what is the process for them to take off deals.

The only counterparties I have with any exposure are:
tudor
wexford

I am asking for them specifically.

Also, on monies we owe counterparties.. like tudor and catequil, what is the process they must go through?

Thanks very much,
Caroline

cell- 917 324 1999
home- 212 737 2082


Here it is.  It also includes Naomi's name/address.


please translate
---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron on 04/18/2001
10:27 AM ---------------------------

"Chris Garrod" <CGGarrod@cdp.bm> on 04/18/2001 09:50:41 AM
To: <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
cc: <Brent.Hendry@enron.com>, <Caroline.Abramo@enron.com>,
<Paul.Radous@enron.com>, <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>

Subject: Re: Cash Collateral

Dear Carol

Under Bermuda law, there is no real concept of "perfecting" security since it
is not necessary to ensure the enforceability in Bermuda that a charge be
registered in Bermuda.  However, although it is not necessary for a security
interest to be registered in order for it to be valid, the charge document
itself can be registered in Bermuda in the Register of Charges in accordance
with Section 55 of the Companies Act 1981 in order to ensure the priority in
Bermuda of the charge.  On registration, any charge evidenced in the charging
document will have priority over any unregistered competing charge or any
subsequently registered competing charge in respect of the assets which are
the subject of the charge (i.e. the cash).

If the agreement will be governed by either Texas or New York law, it will be
a matter of the laws of either Texas or New York as to the actual nature of
the security interest which is created by the charge.

If you would like us to effect the registration of the charge, we would need
an original (or a certified true copy) of the executed document which creates
the security interest.  There is no time limit on such registration.
However, please note that, in addition to our professional fees, there is a
filing fee of $446 which is payable in respect of the registration.

I trust that the above is of some assistance.  If you have any questions
please do not hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards.

Chris Garrod

Christopher Garrod
Conyers Dill & Pearman
Clarendon House, 2 Church Street
Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda
Direct dial  441 299 4923
Fax:  441 292 4720
email  cggarrod@cdp.bm

>>> <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com> 04/17/01 06:54PM >>>
Christopher:
We have done a trade with a Bermuda hedge fund and have negotiated
collateral provisions that may require them to post csah to us.  The
agreement will be governed by either Texas or New York law.  We need your
advice on how to perfect our interest in any cash posted to us that we
would hold in an account in the United States.  Could you please call
either me or Sara Shackelton (713)853-5620 if possible tomorrow or you can
send me an e-mail if that is easier.  I'm hoping that our possession of the
cash is enough.  Sorry for the short fuse on this.  If you need any
additional information, please contact me or Sara.  I will be unavailable
from 9-11 and 2-3 tomorrow Houston time.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


I spoke with Wally Schlink of Rochester today in follow up to our c-call.  He
thought the call went well; however, he still fees the main point is the
price for the PPA.

RPU will be meeting with their Financial Advisor on Monday and they plan to
then meet internally and figure what they would want from Enron to do the
deal.  I believe the will give us their number next week and we will know
where to head from there.

In the interim we need to be working on the following:

1.  Response to the RFP in their format
2.  Prepare a bid bond and get an understanding as to what it may bind us to
do.

I would like for Russ to take lead on these matters.

Note that we cannot go forward with Rochester unless we are technically in
the process.

Oscar


Errol and Joey,
Just an FYI -
The Middle Market - West gas orig group is changing it's name to Gas
Origination - West.  Now when you enter Orig into the West file the Orig
Group should be the new name.
Also, on your Orig Schedule please start showing the West orig as Gas
Origination - West so that everything will match when it is published to the
web.

thanks,
brad


John,
As we discussed, our attorney, Gerald Nemec, will incorporate your language from the red-lined Assignment Agreement in an amendment to the existing letter agreement between ENA and Patina.  The amendment to the letter agreement should be completed this afternoon, at which time Gerald will e-mail you a copy for review.

To the extent that the language is agreeable, Patina can execute Kern's original Assignment Agreement and the amendment to the letter agreement concurrently.

Please call myself or Gerald Nemec (713-853-3512) if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


Attached per your request on Steve's behalf is my "Year 2000
Accomplishments".  This list is of highlights, and is not intended to be
exhaustive.  Let me know if you need more.   thansk  mcs

All other addressees, I copy you for your information.


Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022811.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/28/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR


Here is what Trunkline sent us as what was over scheduled (it's from Lotus Notes so I had to copy and paste):

"Trunkline just called me to tell me that we received 16,595 mmbtu too much
from LNG in the month of March.   There is another ship due to come in on
April 16th.   Trunkline has suggested that we take 16,595 less then what we
are expecting, in order to make up for the March imbalance."

Thanks,
Dan


Please find the attached status/action items for the HPL Transactions.  We are currently on target for a 1 June Close.


Dear U.S. Soccer Family,

As another year comes to a close, we wanted to thank each and every one of you for your support. The last 12 months have been extremely successful for both our senior National Teams and our Youth National Teams and 2002 promises to be exciting on all fronts.

The U.S. Men's National Team qualified for our fourth straight World Cup, setting the stage for an exciting 2002 tournament, while the U.S. Women took their first steps toward the 2003 Women's World Cup by building on the successful launch of the WUSA this past summer. In the year ahead, our men will be focused on the Korea/Japan World Cup, where we will square off against Portugal, South Korea and Poland in June. We are confident that with your support and the right preparation, we will have a successful tournament. For the U.S. Women, our goals are no less tangible, with preparation for the 2003 Women's World Cup qualifying becoming the focus of our activities.

For our youth national teams, we saw our U-17 and U-20 Men's teams qualify for FIFA's bi-annual World Youth Championships in those age brackets. In 2002, our Under-19 Women's National Team will have the opportunity to compete in the first ever FIFA Women's World Youth Championship, with qualifying scheduled for May in Trinidad & Tobago and the actual tournament set for Canada in August. This is real progress for the development of the women's game and we expect our team to successfully qualify and then compete for the title of this first-ever event.

In all of the world championships, we have the opportunity to measure ourselves against the best teams in the world, and that helps to motivate our athletes. But it is the support we receive from our U.S. Soccer family and fans that inspires our players. Again, thank you for your support throughout the year and into the future. We look forward to a successful 2002.

Sincerely,

Bruce Arena                               April Heinrichs
Head Coach & Technical Director           Head Coach & Technical Director
U.S. Men's National Team                  U.S. Women's National Team

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To end your membership in ussoccerfan.com, please visit http://membership.ussoccer.com/member/unsubscribe.sps?msmid=1 and fill out an unsubscribe request. Thank you for supporting U.S. Soccer!


Ellen Wallumrod
02/20/2001 02:17 PM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: MTM request

Any luck with this request ?
The auditors are chasing the information.

Ellen
---------------------- Forwarded by Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001
02:14 PM ---------------------------

Ellen Wallumrod
02/16/2001 01:44 PM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: MTM request

Errol,

I've had an audit request from Swift Energy Company, and they want the MTM
value as of December 31, 2000 for the following trades:

QA0515.2
QA0515.3
QA0515.4
QI7045.1

Could you, or someone in your group, please forward it to me.

Many thanks !

Ellen
x54099


I think Mike should sign

Peter Styles@ECT
04/20/2001 04:57 AM
To: Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Kate Bauer/EU/Enron@Enron, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT,
Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Catherine McKalip-Thompson/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Lauren Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey
Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Jacobson/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nailia Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: DRAFT response to Greenpeace Kyoto letter

Jeff: Following our conference call yesterday, Nailia and I will send you a
European Government Affairs mark-up later today. We'll try to incorporate any
views expressed by Paul Hennemeyer and Doug Wood too.

Jeffrey Keeler@ENRON
19/04/2001 22:00
To: Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Kate Bauer/EU/Enron@Enron, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT,
Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Catherine McKalip-Thompson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Lauren Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Jacobson/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: DRAFT response to Greenpeace Kyoto letter

Attached is a first draft of a response to Greenpeace's April 5 letter to
Jeff Skilling asking for Enron's answers to some specific questions on the
Kyoto Protocol and climate change.   Similar letters were delivered by
Greenpeace Europe in native languages to Enron's offices in the UK,
Netherlands, Spain, and Belgium.

I have attached a copy of one of the letters below.  All the questions are
the same in each.

I have drafted a response with the goals of:

1)  Being responsive to Greenpeace without being defensive or without
"greenwashing."   We have an already-published public "statement" on climate
change and a very positive, solution-oriented story to tell, with many facts
and accomplishments to back up our statements.   I think our letter can land
in the stack that they consider "positive" responses, and not in the stack of
non-responses or "we don't care" responses.

2)  Steering away from directly answering the no-win questions about "Kyoto."
  I think we can respond to the letter in a way that provides meaningful
answers to the general themes of the letter.   I have discussed this with
many of you already, but I strongly feel that we should not get dragged down
into debates over what we like/dislike, support/oppose about Kyoto....we'll
quickly get into questions we can't now answer, and may never be able to
answer.   I'd prefer it if we rise above the politics of the issue and look
solution-oriented by saying counties and companies should continue to be
engaged in this important issue.

3)  Developing corporate-wide messages that we can use in multiple
applications -- arming our PR and govt. affairs advocates with a tight script
to use in their efforts; responding to shareholder inquiries and annual
meeting Q&A;  Ken Lay or other executive speeches and presentations;
something for our Corporate Responsibility annual report.

Sorry for the long preamble, but climate change has become a very sensitive
issue of late, and our message/strategy needs to be very coordinated and we
need to have one clear set of statements that everyone in the company can
understand and use.  With that said, I also believe that these messages
should be used very carefully, as the subject matter is complex and straying
too far from the basics can be dangerous.  We should designate one or two
clear spokespeople that can answer any follow up to the Greenpeace letter by
press or policymakers, and really stick to the boundaries of what's in our
response letter.

There is also the issue of customizing responses from the European offices,
using this letter as a template and adding a few examples of Enron good deeds
in the local areas.   I am not opposed to doing so, but would again
appreciate being able to review these responses before they go.  Please let
me know if you have other views.

I would like to send our response by early next week, maybe even Monday 4/23
if we can turn it around that fast.  Thank you for your input and assistance
and I look forward to your reply.

Jeff

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541


what does the siting bill provide for?

Mona L Petrochko@EES
08/29/2000 04:38 PM
To: Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, James M
Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell, Roger Yang,
Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Denne@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, West GA, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven
J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain@Enron

Subject: Senate passes Alper/Davis Bill 30-0

AB 265 passed through the Senate a few minutes ago.  It now must go to the
Assembly, where there is still a lot of uncertainty about what changes the
Assembly will want to the bill.  We still haven't seen the latest
"republican" language.

Also, AB 265 is double joined to AB 970, controversial siting bill.  To the
extent one or the other fails, they both fail.

AB 265 (Davis/Alpert) has:

1.  a 6.5 cent/kWh energy rate cap through 2002, with potential extension
through 2003.
2.  Applicable to residential, small commercial (up to 100 kW)
3.  Opt-in provision for large industrial/agricultural customers at 6.5 cents
with an annual true-up
4.  Use of revenues from utility generation assets (including PPA) to offset
undercollections.
5.  Reasonableness review for San Diego G&E

Will update with more information as available.

No news about SCE.


Bob's just finishing up a meeting, so I'll have to wait a minute for info on
this EES sleeve. I'll let you know as soon as I see him.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/02/2001 02:29 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/2 Checkout

AMEREX WEST
Bob Badeer

I am missing the following deals:

1)  Sell  Sempra Energy Trading Corp.  100  NP 15  1/1/02- 3/31/02 50mw
off     0.0075  fee
2)  Buy  Enron Energy Services, Inc.  99.95  NP 15  1/1/02- 3/31/02 50mw
off      0.00  fee

BLOOMBERG
All deals checked out fine.

PREBON WEST
All deals checked out fine.