Gary,

Does the workhseet mentioned below assist you with the monthly operations
related to the industrial customers?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
07:57 PM ---------------------------
To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Industrials

 First of the month  industrials are coming along fine.  I will finalize my
pathing tomorrow, Thursday,  and set up buybacks and swings by the
    end of day Friday.

     The industrial "Buyback & Deficiency Deals" worksheet  has captured the
necessary data to help Gas Control & the on-call scheduler as well as
      myself and Client Services.
      I  will have a preliminary worksheet done by the end of day Friday.

      I am on vacation during the week of July 5th thru July 10th.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Pat Clynes @ ENRON                           06/28/2000 12:45 PM

To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Industrials

Robert,
How do we look on the industrial deadlines?  Please let me know.   Thanks,
Pat

Daren J Farmer@ECT
06/28/2000 11:19 AM
To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Industrials

When will the buybacks and swings be set up for July?  I am a little
concerned with the long weekend coming up.  I believe that we agreed that
these would be set up by the 3rd work day, which would be Friday the 7th.
(Six days of flow.)  I definitely don't think that we should any later.  It
would be great if this could be handled sooner, miimizing our economic impact.

Additionally, we need to get the Industrial spreadsheet up and running
again.  This report is very beneficial to Gas Control, industrial traders and
schedulers on call.

Let me know what you think.

D


I want to take a moment to thank each of you for having a summer Analyst or
Associate work on your team. I also want to remind everyone what a high
stakes activity this is for Enron.
Based on your recommendation, we will make offers at the end of the summer to
those interns who perform, and who you endorse as a potential future member
of your team. Those interns who have had a good experience and accept our
offer will be the lowest risk hires we make - from any source. We will have
effectively interviewed and watched them work for 2-3 months. They also have
the potential to be the most effective advocates and talent scouts we have,
when they return to campus. On the flip side, those who don't have meaningful
assignments, or have bad experiences during the summer can severely hurt our
efforts.
Thank you again for being part of this very important activity. If you have
any questions, or if areas of concern arise during the summer, please contact
Ted Bland (x35275), Traci Warner (x33242) or me (x36671).
We appreciate your contributions to this important effort for Enron.
Billy


First off I hope your still not at work when I send this.

Secondly it would be cool to meet earlier in the week but I'm in San Antonio
and will be until Friday.  I will be driving to Houston on Friday morning to
do some packing and then the parents will be coming up on Saturday morning
to help with the final move.  I will pretty much leave it in your ball park
about Friday night.  I know you have been working long hours and Friday is
just a bad day.  Even though I would like to see you, if you have a repeat
of last week then I understand if you want to call it off.  In that case
maybe we can meet up some other time.  Although I do remember a girl telling
me once that weekends are her time and she was going to go out no matter
what.

Let me know what you think and I'll probably give you a call Friday
afternoon to see how things are going.

Kyle

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


(See attached file: HPLN0116.xls)

 - HPLN0116.xls


Christi,
 As I have been thinking about this problem, my opposition to a standard
model is declining, partly out of frustration with the slow progress being
made.  I think, however, that we ought to think about the potential
consequences of recommending a standard model.  If we simply endorse PJM,
then we may inadvertently get its warts as well -- no secondary transmission
market, ICAP market, etc.  I think we are considering the same thing approach
as was reported by Charles Yeung's in his note on Tuesday's Inter-RTO
Coordination (Seams) Conference:

"Harvey Reed, Constellation Power, suggested that FERC impose a standard
tariff for all RTOs to work from that did not restrict RTOs from filing
different proposals, but would limit their ability to diverge from a single
market model."

 In addition to the standard model, there needs to be a deadline for either
filing the tariff or for filing the standard tariff.  Without a "feet to the
fire" feature, nothing the grand stall will continue.  In arguing for a
standard model, the PJM system could be the core of a proposal but we should
specific modifications to address our concerns.  On the transmission rights
issue, for instance, a simple "don't allocate" solution won't work.  The lack
of the secondary market for NY TCCs or PJM FTRs goes both to the lack of
information and to the way the rights are defined.  If as Harvey Reed
suggests, RTOs can submit alternative approaches, at least there will be
pressure to get moving.  I have not discussed this idea with West Power.

 It then occurred to me that FERC  is unlikely to impose a standard tariff
without a rulemaking proceeding.  Whether they could act by fiat or not is a
moot point, since  I doubt that they would do so without creating a record.
There are two possible down sides to a rule making.  (1)  The outcome of a
rulemaking is something of a crap shoot.  The incumbents have a pretty good
record in the past, of coming out of rulemakings with plenty of goodies such
as the native load exemption in Order No. 888.  There is a also a distinct
risk that PJM's ICAP or transmission right allocation process is given
blessed status, which will make revision of them later to be a huge uphill
battle.  (2)  The other consequence of a rulemaking its effect on current
RTO discussions.  The best outcome is that the uncertainty of the rulemaking
creates an urgency  to get a proposal filed before a new FERC rule cuts off
options from a new the standard for review.  The uncertainty prior to the
issuance of Order No. 888 in fact had that effect in the West.  On the other
hand it can mean that nothing happens until the new rule is issued.  This
also happened prior to Order No. 888, with a number of companies sitting on
their hands, using the time delay to protect existing positions, while
whipping up State regulators' fears of jurisdictional shift as necessary to
boost their own position.

 These are only own views.  I have not had a chance to speak with West Power
this week, but I will approach Tim when I am in Portland again next week.

Steve

	Christi L Nicolay
	06/19/2001 04:21 PM

		 To: Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: INTERIM MODEL TALKING POINTS

Can we focus the PJM language as an interim fix toward the East (while maybe
the threat of PJM in the West will make the West RTOs act quickly and adopt
everything that Steve W. has been advocating).  Also, I agree with the ISO
being required to provide much greater information on where the congestion
occurs.  While the allocation of FTRs is a problem and the idiosyncratic
nature is also a problem, it is because the traders do not have access to all
the information.  They have told me that if they had access to all the
information about congestion from the past several years, they could
essentially build a model for anticipated congestion that could trade "above"
the underlying FTRs as financial instruments.

Steve Walton
06/18/2001 03:30 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: INTERIM MODEL TALKING POINTS

Jim,

 I have added my comments to your draft.  My concern with the "Adopt PJM"
approach is that it will become a fiat accompli with regard to congestion
management. and the nature of future transmission rights.  Once adopted as
the standard, nothing else will be accepted and any move to a decentralized
approach is highly unlikely.  Unlike the British, we have a hard time
changing horses because of our multi-jurisdictional Federal system of
government.

 The PJM's lack of a secondary FTR market is more that just an allocation
problem.  If that were true, they New York would have a secondary market --
none exists there either.  The unpredictability of prices is probably the
biggest problem since no one knows how to value FTRs or TCCs.  I think the
nature of instrument is also not particularly helpful.

 During our discussion of Seabron Adamson's last draft, I maintained that a
centralized unit commitment process didn't fit the Pacific Northwest (PNW)
with its pattern of trading to achieve coordination between hydroelectric and
thermoelectric generation.  You asked me to provide more detail hydro-thermal
operation.  I am including a paper that covers the nature of PNW operations
and contracting with observations about the nature of unit commitment.  Given
other work and travel, it has taken some time to complete the paper and its
examples.  I hope this will help to explain why I am hesitant to endorse a
centralize unit commitment implementation.

Steve

	James D Steffes@ENRON
	06/18/2001 01:48 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: INTERIM MODEL TALKING POINTS

Here is the draft of an Interim step for Enron to give to Lay.  Please give
me your comments.  This is CONFIDENTIAL and should not be shared outside the
company.

Jim


In case you haven't heard, New Orleans Saints RB  Ricky Williams suffered a
broken ankle today and is expected to miss 6-8 weeks  which for most Fantasy
GMs means he's done for the year.
?
Chat Morton is the rookie from USC who filled in  for Williams. But he's
short (5' 8" and light 187#)? and I don't think this  is a situation like
Denver where the backup RB will step in and perform almost  as well as the
starter.?
?
Just wanted to give you a headsup as I know many  leagues have a first come
first serve policy for distributing free  agents.
?
More Monday.
?
Joe
?
?
?
?

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


Rachel, attached is a spreadsheet with SFTS conversion information as you requested.  I sent Frazier and Teb a note to advise if these customers must have consecutive releases in order to keep their FTS-1 contracts active and am awaiting their feedback.  Please let me know if you want to see this in a different format or with additional information.  Also, I did not fill in the date that the FTS-1 contracts revert back to SFTS because it all depends on whether we leave the contracts open for monthly releases.  nb


i put that as unofficial vac

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 22, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Quezada, Daniel
Subject:	RE: 2002 Vacation for Chris

did you count the half day on 4/16 or all day on 4/19 or should we leave these as unofficial time?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quezada, Daniel
Sent:	Monday, April 15, 2002 11:36 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: 2002 Vacation for Chris

I didn't count 1/2-1/4;1/7; or 2/1 but actually you will have 1 1/2 day of vac left on unofficial vacation time...

Daniel Quezada

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 15, 2002 11:06 AM
To:	Quezada, Daniel
Subject:	2002 Vacation for Chris

2002 Vacation

Rollover from 2001  	40 hours
2002 credit	           160 hours
Disc Holiday		  8 hours

Total			208 hours = 26 days

Vacation Days
208	Beginning Balance

8 hours Disc Holiday	Mon 2/11/02
8 hours			Fri 3/15/02
4 hours			Fri 3/22/02
8 hours			Fri 3/29/02
4 hours			Tue 4/16/02
8 hours			Fri 4/19/02

40 hours total

168 hours remaining = 21.0 day


Nice!

What's going on? I think my stuff is here on Friday so that means moving in this weekend. We should see if Johnny is going to be around on Friday night. My number at work is 974-6910.

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"George, Mike (CA - Calgary)" <migeorge@deloitte.ca>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22George+2C+20Mike+20+28CA+20-+20Calgary+29+22+20+3Cmigeorge+40deloitte+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Dorland, Chris; 'Keith Marshall'; 'lauren maris'; 'Matty'; 'Ry-Ry'; 'Schoenhals, Jeff CIC'; Dorland, Dan
Subject:	FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Zureski, Max (CA - Calgary)
Sent:   Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:38 AM
To:     Lyons, Jeff (CA - Calgary); Hyman, David (CA - Calgary); Koller, Rob (CA - Calgary); Podavin, Michelle (CA - Calgary); Brownell, Rory (CA - Calgary); Donegan, Kevin (CA - Calgary); 'darin.olson@dynegy.com'; 'craig.fisher@atcomidstream.com'; Clements, Colin (CA - Calgary); George, Mike (CA - Calgary); 'tmitzel@cdnx.ca'; 'byron_g_davis@anadarko.com'
Subject:
Couple pictures from a friend in NY
 <<Proposed Landscape Changes.gif>>
Max Zureski, CA
Financial Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche LLP

*       E-Mail   :  mzureski@deloitte.ca        Deloitte & Touche LLP
(       Phone    :      +1 (403) 267 0589       Calgary, Alberta

  .     Fax       :  +1 (403) 263 2390  Canada

 - Proposed Landscape Changes.gif << File: Proposed Landscape Changes.gif >>


Jeff Richter
deal 459985
Check with Richter and see if the counterparty should be Sempra or PGET

Mike Swerzbin
deal 459788
Per Prebon counterparty should be Williams not Salt River.

MIke Swerzbin
deal 459789
Per Amerex cp should be Public Service of Colorado not El Paso

Mike Swerzbin
deal 460001
Amerex does not recognize it.

mike Swerzbon
deal 460002
Per Amerex term should be Q1'01 not Jan'01

Mike Swerzbin
I am missing the following Amerex deal:
Buy SCEM 25 mw of MID-C off-peak hrs for DEC' at $100.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000
04:59 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Paige B Grumulaitis                           05/04/2000 06:45 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ron Baker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: 133 - effectiveness

We wanted to catch up with you on where you are on ideas for testing.  Also,
I think we will need to get testing N America power and gas hedges on genco
as fast as possible.


Fletch... attached is the bid sheet that I put together to keep track of all
your sporadic pricing initiatives.

If the format is OK please complete and resend to me with your view on
current prices.

BT


[IMAGE]
?

You're invited to:
Holiday Soiree in the 6th Ward

Hosted by:
Kya and Neil Sainsbury-Carter

To view the full invitation, click here!

[IMAGE]

Use Evite to host your next get-together. It's easy, fun and 100% free

??????	 HAVING TROUBLE?

	If the "To view the full invitation, click here!" link above didn't take you
to your Invite, try double-clicking the link below (or copy and paste it into
your web browser's location bar and hit 'Enter'):
	http://www.evite.com/r?iid=YMIDJQQKTEIEKBVQRKAE&li=ic

	Still having trouble? Email support@evite.com
		??????
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]


I guess you didn't like my trade offer.

Othon, Inc.
Jose A. Ramirez
11111 Wilcrest Green Dr., Suite 128
Houston, Texas 77042-4739
713.975.8555
713.975.9068 fax

jramirez@othon.com


I was really hoping we could do this on a best efforts basis with all of us
covering any issues arising during the month of December. Since there seems
to be insistence on a date certain there is no choice but to have Steve start
in EBS on 1-1-2001. Ted can't physically be there until then. It will be
difficult to have full RAC responsibility without physically being there.
Rick


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.


Did we get from Lisa the appropriate internal account opening form from Lisa yet?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


I am changing the following deal tickets in Sitara for March 2002.  I'm still not sure what to do about all the volumes showing up in Sitara for non-active deals.

Counterparty		Sitara		Pipeline		Comment
Midland Cogen		332163		PEPL		Changed volume from 0 to 5,000 per day
Midland Cogen		340362		TRKL		Changed volume form 0 to 6,800 per day


That's ok.  Our trading policy doesn't allow you to trade anything we trade.


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042401.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2


Someone I know just put in a bid on priceline for a long weekend in colorado
and got tickets for $185 RT.  If we get enough people together and everyone
is flexible we could use priceline.

-e


---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 02:29
PM ---------------------------

Jim Schwieger
04/07/2000 10:35 AM
To: kevin_pilkington@kne.com
cc: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Interconnect Reimbursement Language

Even though we have changed the reimbursement from 50 / 50 on both
interconnects to each entity paying 100% of one interconnect I still feel the
language requiring either party to reimburse the other if operational
circumstances constrain the physical intent of the interconnect is still
needed.  In this way both entities will be aligned in trying to insure both
the receipt and delivery interconnects function as intended.  Please let me
know if you disagree.

 Jim Schwieger


Luanne:
Our credit person is fine with revising the MAC language to say taht a MAC
would be triggered if either (1) an entity's Credit Support Provider's rating
from S&P is below BBB- by S&P or Baa3 by Moody's or (2) if such Credit
Support Provider fails to be rated by both S&P and Moody's.  Also, in
Sections 4.5 and 4.6 of the ISDA Schedule we would like to change the
reference to "Goldman Group" to "The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc."

I will have Tana Jones draft an amendment and send it to you.  Call me if
there are any problems with the above.

Tana,
Please draft an amendment for my review.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com