Legal Work Group
Please find attached Eric Freedman's status report on his sub group's
activities
for your information and for discussion at our meeting next week.

Barney Speckman
RTO West  KEMA Team
Portland Office Phone 503-258-0475
RTO West Offices
5933 NE Win Sivers Drive
Portland, Oregon

BMS Consulting
2130 Belford Drive
Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598
925-287-0365 (Walnut Creek Phone and Fax)

Return-Path: <ericf@prestongates.com>
Received: from  rly-yb04.mx.aol.com (rly-yb04.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.4]) by
air-yb05.mail.aol.com (v74.17) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 02:07:20 -0400
Received: from  excon.prestongates.com (host96-69.prestongates.com
[207.12.96.69]) by rly-yb04.mx.aol.com (v74.17) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2000
02:06:54 2000
Received: by excon.prestongates.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
id <N224MSM9>; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:07:28 -0700
Message-ID: <D552D46E358BD31196F10000F6CBB4E60141531B@exsea1.prestongates.com>
From: "Freedman, Eric  (SEA)" <ericf@prestongates.com>
To: "'sberman@hewm.com'" <sberman@hewm.com>,        "'dbrookhyser@nevp.com'"
<dbrookhyser@nevp.com>,        "xx-Christensen, Eric (SNO PUD)"
<elchristensen@snopud.com>,        "'adavis@state.mt.us'"
<adavis@state.mt.us>,        "'michaelearly@earthlink.net'"
<michaelearly@earthlink.net>,        "'pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com'"
<pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com>,        "'mhain@enron.com'"
<mhain@enron.com>,        "'whannaford@nwppc.org'"
<whannaford@nwppc.org>,        "'gfh@bpa.gov'" <gfh@bpa.gov>,
"'cfi1@tca-us.com'" <cfi1@tca-us.com>,        "'snkripalani@stoel.com'"
<snkripalani@stoel.com>,        "'pmurphy@mbllp.com'"
<pmurphy@mbllp.com>,        "'douglas_nichols@pgn.com'"
<douglas_nichols@pgn.com>,        "'will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us'"
<will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us>,        "'shellyr@teleport.com'"
<shellyr@teleport.com>,        "'rfroberts@bpa.gov'"
<rfroberts@bpa.gov>,        "'kyle@ppcpdx.org'" <kyle@ppcpdx.org>,
"'tshuba@sheagardner.com'" <tshuba@sheagardner.com>,
"'bmspeckman@aol.com'" <bmspeckman@aol.com>,        "'steve@nwenergy.org'"
<steve@nwenergy.org>,        "'mwood@stoel.com'" <mwood@stoel.com>,
"'cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us'" <cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us>
Cc: "'gdahlke@painehamblen.com'" <gdahlke@painehamblen.com>,
"'sdleonard@earthlink.net'" <sdleonard@earthlink.net>,
"'pdmichie@bpa.gov'" <pdmichie@bpa.gov>
Subject: Bylaws, Articles, Tax Status Subgroup -- Status Report
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:07:58 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

    This e-mail is intended to reach all of those who have expressed an
interest in being part of the Legal Work Group subgroup addressing the RTO
bylaws, articles and tax status.  Please let me know if my e-mail
distribution list is missing anyone who would like to participate in the
subgroup.

    I would divide the immediate tasks before us into four main
categories:

    1.  General Governance Issues (Especially RTO Membership, Board
Composition and Technical Advisory Committee Issues)

    At the Governance Workshop on June 15, we had a good discussion of
issues relating to the appropriate number and scope of membership classes,
board composition and method of selecting the members of the Technical
Advisory Committee.  Barney Speckman is in the process of scheduling a
meeting in early July for a continuation of discussion of these topics and
any other governance issues that may be of interest.

    2.  Board and Employee Conflict of Interest Provisions/Board
Member Qualifications

    One element of the RTO bylaws that will require a fair amount of
thought and discussion is the appropriate nature and extent of the trustee
and employee disqualification/conflict of interest provisions.  Another such
element is the required qualifications of the RTO board members.  John
Buechler of the New York ISO has prepared for us a good summary of the board
member qualifications that have been adopted or are under consideration by
various existing or proposed ISOs, and Barney Speckman will distribute
copies of John's summary to the group.  I would like to have a discussion of
these issues at the next meeting, with the aim of preparing and circulating
one or more straw man proposals as soon thereafter as possible.

    3.  Consideration of Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Conforming
Revisions to Bylaws

    IndeGO was proposed to be formed in Utah, in large part because
Utah's nonprofit corporation law was determined as of three years ago to
contain the most favorable provisions for trustee indemnification of any
state in which IndeGO was proposed to operate.  RTO West, the nonprofit
corporation that is serving as the vehicle for our RTO in formation, was
incorporated this spring in Washington in large part on the strength of
Washington's provisions for indemnification of nonprofit corporation
trustees.  Our subgroup needs to review the laws of the states in which RTO
West would operate, and come up with a recommendation as to whether
consideration should be given to incorporation of the RTO in any state other
than Washington.  Once a determination is made as to the appropriate state
for incorporation, the bylaws will need to be conformed to the requirements
of that state's nonprofit corporation law.  Anyone who is interested in
helping out on these fronts is most welcome.

    4.  Potential RTO Application for Tax Exemption

    The California ISO has been qualified for exemption from federal
income tax, and a determination needs to be made whether such qualification
would be appropriate for RTO West as well.  Our subgroup has been given the
task of identifying the relevant considerations to be taken into account in
making the determination whether to seek tax-exempt status.  Robb Roberts
and Sanjiv Kripalani have expressed interest in helping to undertake this
analysis.  If any of the rest of you is interested in participating, please
let me know.

    I will be out of the office for the next week-and-a-half, but will
be checking voice mail and e-mail regularly.

    I look forward to seeing you all soon.

                            Eric

Eric E. Freedman
Preston Gates & Ellis LLP
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000
Seattle, WA  98104-7078
Phone:  (206) 623-7580 x 7727
Direct:  (206) 224-7327
FAX:  (206) 623-7022
E-mail:  ericf@prestongates.com

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:  The foregoing message contains information that
is protected by the attorney-client privilege.  If this message was sent to
you in error, any use, disclosure or distribution of its contents is
prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please call Preston
Gates & Ellis LLP at the number listed above, and delete this message
without copying it.  Thank you.


congratulations?  condolences?  anyway, let's talk.  today's bad.  you in
tomorrow?


RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


---------------------- Forwarded by Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/22/99 05:24 AM ---------------------------

Terence H Thorn
11/22/99 05:22 AM
To: "Michael J. Farrar" <MFARRAR@mail.arco.com>, Edith
Terry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: "Ken Thompson" <KTHOMPS1@mail.arco.com>, sburns@pecc.org

Subject: Re: EWG meeting

The Energy Business network survived the EWG meeting in Wellington. I'll give
you a quick recap and my impressions and  we can decide if I should send a
note out to everyone next week or wait until we meet on the 15th for my
report. The official  report should be on the internet Monday.  A meeting of
the EBN has been scheduled in Melbourne on March 18-19 to coincide with the
Davos Meeting.  They are also talking about an EWG meeting in March also.

I will be late for the meeting on the 15th. I have a black tie dinner on
Tuesday night and will take the first plane to Houston from New York
Wednesday  AM. Sorry but I can't get out of the dinner, it's been planned for
a long time and I have guests.

20 countries were present. If you look back on the agenda for the 18th
meeting of the EWG business network  on November 18-19 in Wellington, four
agenda items were of particular interest to the Energy Business Network:

 1) the report on the 2nd meeting of the  EBN meeting:  we were forewarned
that the activities of the EBN would be under attack by the Japanese, Chinese
and Mexicans.
 2) the discussion and report on the EWG implementation Committee's Visit
Team to Thailand, 8-10 November 1999.
 3) the DOE recommendation on a Proposed Plan of Work on Energy Services-
again very controversial.
 4) the proposed Energy Ministerial in the US in the Spring.

Mexico, China and Japan were not happy with the proactive push of the EBN.  I
assume it was Mexico that made sure we were excluded from the discussions on
the Thai visit and energy services, two EBN initiatives  Barry and I would
only be allowed in the room for the EBN report, something I protested prior
to the meeting. With the help of Tim Mackey,  we somewhat circumvented the
restriction by his going around the room one by one after Barry's report
asking for reaction to what was said.  This forced a discussion with us in
the room.  Both Barry and I responded to the issues raised.

The dissenters maintained that the EBN was working too fast  and that we were
taking the initiative away from the EWG and becoming too independent. Japan
supports the concept of the EBN but made it clear that it was the EWG that
sets initiatives.  The EBN "summary of decisions" was a particular affront.
We had strong support from Australia, Canada, Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand,
the Philippines (they are concerned that the EBN not duplicate EWG
initiatives) Singapore, Thailand, and the US.  China surprised us by
complaining that the EWG and EBN meetings were now separate, not back to
back. Barry explained this was more an accident that anything else.

It took some effort, but I think we made our case. I emphasized strongly that
the EBN consisted of some of the best and brightest in the energy industry
and that we would not be shy about  offering our ideas. We operate with a
great sense of urgency seeing that APEC will eventually $30 trillion of
investment to meet their energy needs. Each economy could accept of reject
these ideas but I doubted they wanted to be a rubber stamp for the EWG. As
for energy services, as I understood it, the DOE program was designed to get
the EWG up to speed on what energy services are, an educational effort that
compliments what is going on at the WTO.  Services represented stage three in
energy development that would increase the efficiency of the infrastructure
and offer new products and services to users of energy.  The key discussion
would occur on Friday in our absence.

There were two official reports on the Thai meeting, one by the secretariat
which was more of a recap of the process and agenda with no evaluation of the
success and one by the Thai's, the last paragraph of which was very
favorable.  Ironically, the controversy concerned the process by which we
participants were chosen. No one has been able to explain to me why the EWG
would care about this issue and I honestly believe that the USG was a major
factor in stirring this up and when you cut through the bull, it's about
exerting control over the EWG.  Again, everyone was in support of the
consultative process and the value it  brings in opening dialogues on
difficult issues.  I noted that the Thai's should get particular credit  for
being so open and candid in the discussions.

In our absence there was a long discussion on the Energy principles endorsed
by the EBN which were turned back into an Energy Charter.  They agreed that
an Energy Charter statement would be drafted by the secretariat and
circulated to member economies.

The implementation committee discussion on Friday was supportive but as I
noted but  focused on the process, not as I emphasized it should be- on the
results which were a success. They was strong support led by DOE/USG to
eliminate the steering and implementation committees. I did not see the final
language and was presented with two conflicting versions: one that letters
requesting a visit would go to the secretariat who would forward them to the
EWG and EBN for suggestions on who should participate, the Secretariat
deciding, and one where the Secretariat sends the request to the EWG and they
consult with their EBN representatives and decide.  I made it clear that the
latter process was unacceptable and the EBN would strongly oppose it. This
process would take months and the EWG was in no position to decide who could
best provide the people to address an economies specific request.  I told
this to the USG delegation and they assured me the former would be the model.
We'll see.

Energy services was also a long discussion and the Japanese focused on
severing this initiative from anything to do with the WTO. In my private
discussions with the Japanese, they expressed the concern that this could be
considered an endorsement of the liberalization of energy services and used
against them in the WTO negotiations.  Again, I didn't see the final outcome,
but I understand that at the next EWG meeting, will present a trimmed own
version of the work plan minus any reference to the WTO. It was agreed that
there should be a seminar on the topic  but the EWG would only consider a
seminar at the next meeting. This is way to slow and Barry and David think we
need to get a white paper before the EWG in the next few months and push for
a seminar at the next EWG meeting.  This is awkward for me since the US EBN
has no position, but the entire EBN supports this effort as does the USG and
we need to work with everyone to make the effort a success.

With great skepticism that the US can organize a Ministerial in five months
(Edmonton took ten months), the EWG agreed to a Ministerial May 8-12.  At the
EWG meeting on Thursday, I pushed the idea that the day before the official
meeting should be dedicated to a series of direct interactions with the
business community much like the Latin meeting in New Orleans.  The USG said
they will include this idea in their proposal at the January steering
meeting. The Ministerial will be on the west coast.

I am glad that I was there even though many of the discussions were painful.
We beat down and reconfirmed strong support for the EBN, although it may be
watered down, energy services is still on the table and can still be a
valuable  educating process while meeting the concerns of some of the US EBN
members, the consultative process is alive and well -- we'll see if it's been
wounded -- and we may have a great opportunity in May for direct interaction
with the energy ministers.

Wish you had been there. It rained for four days.


Dear Employee:

Previously you were sent a letter regarding Open Enrollment for U.S. Expatriates for 2002 with an attachment for electing Spending Accounts for 2002.  Unfortunately, the version of the Spending Account Election Form you received previously is not user friendly. Please complete the revised attached form when enrolling in the Spending Accounts for 2002 and fax to me at (713) 646-9501.  The original should be returned to me by mail to the address below.

Thank you.

Linda Hallmark
Global Employee Services
333 Clay Street, Suite 3AC2023
Houston, Texas  77002-7361
Telephone (713) 646-9678
Fax (713) 646-9501


Thanks in advance for agreeing to speak at the Global Operations Controller
Forum.  There will be approximately 30 Enron business controllers present at
the meeting.  All have responsibility for mid and back office operations for
the following Enron entities:  Enron North America, Enron Europe, Enron South
America, Enron Global Markets, Enron Industrial Markets, Enron Broadband
Services and Enron Energy Services.  Attendees will be here from Houston,
Calgary, Tokyo, Sydney, London and New York (metals business-maybe!).

Attached for your reference is the agenda. There may be some slight changes
before the forum begins, but this will give you a good idea of the topics to
be covered and the other speakers who will address the group.

You are scheduled to address the group as follows:

Date:  Monday, October 23, 2000
Time:  3:30 pm
Place:  The Warwick Hotel
  The Versailles Room - 12th Floor
  5701 Main Street
  Houston,  TX  77005

I have noted that your topic will be assessing, measuring and managing market
risk.  Any references that you could make to the importance of information
flow between RAC and operations would be great to cover.  Feel free to offer
up a challenge to the group.

I hope that you will be able to join us for the tour of Enron Field and for
dinner at Ruggles Center Field Terrace on Monday evening.  The tour is at
6:00 and dinner is at 7:00.


Norma,

The need for a new position within the research group has evolved along with
our expanding responsibilities, and we would like to fill that position with
an already on-board employee familiar with same, that person being William
(Sam) Smith.

The new position created it that for a Staff Specialist, who would be
responsible for technical duties including evaluation and quality control of
weather forecasting procedures, design and preparation of  the research
Intelligence Intelligence newsletter, operational responsibilities related to
Morning Report assembly, and hurricane season surveillance as well as
satellite system supervision..

We would like to make this retroactive to January 1st of this year.

- - -  Mike Roberts


We will also take the interdesk variance for 0011 - $123K
PL


Attached is the spreadsheet with exchange detail by individual. It's a big
spreadsheet you should go to the Tab
'Detailed Sheet with Exchange Fees'


Can you give David a call?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dupre, David
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 12:30 AM
To: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Re: D&B service

Hi, I have not heard from James Scribner yet.

Thanks
David

Mary Solmonson
02/05/2001 08:48 AM
To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: D&B service

I have forwarded your message to James Scribner.  He now heads the Global
teams and has responsibility for our relationship with D&B.

David P Dupre
02/04/2001 09:32 AM
To: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: D&B service

Hi, may I have access to D&B. Bruce Harris in our group mentioned that you
might be able to gain access for me.

Thanks
David 3-3528
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2001 12:35
AM ---------------------------

Bruce Harris@ENRON
12/07/2000 01:47 PM
To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: D&B service

get access to all so i can ask you for credit info.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Harris/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000 01:50
PM ---------------------------

Mike Mumford@ECT
11/03/2000 12:44 PM
To: Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jean-Sebastien Fontaine/Corp/Enron@Enron, George Zivic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig
Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: D&B service

Bruce:

1)  KMV.... access ID "mmenron"  PW "bryan1"   ...  please keep in mind this
is a test ID only... only single log on (i.e., get off if you're not using).

2)  Egan-Jones... thought you already had access... we were approached "to
fill out Houston contract"... I will ask.  Jean-Sebastien Fontaine or Tomas
Valnek have it on their computers (via Bloomberg) if you need immediate
assistance.

3)  D&B... I don't know.  Mary Solmonson (Houston) is who we go through for
all the D&B stuff.  If you want Moody's, S&P, or other one-off company
reports call Tomas Valnek (Manager of our credit analysis section).

Mike

Bruce Harris@ENRON
03/11/2000 17:26
To: Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT, George Zivic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig
Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: D&B service

Mike,

Would you have information on how we might get access to D&B company reports
here in Houston?  Also KMV and Egan-Jones?

Regards,  Bruce


please ask you groups to participate, and spread the word.  Thanks.  Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
03:22 PM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
10/25/2000 01:06 PM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne
Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V
Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Hermans/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tim
Battaglia/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Help Improve ENA's, EGM's and EIM's Participation in The Pulse!

The opportunity to provide feedback via The Pulse ends on Friday, October 27
and we need your help to improve our participation rate.  I have attached the
latest figures below, but in a nutshell, only 52.76% of our employees have
participated, which is below the company average.

We would like to do a lot better.

Here are the business unit participation rates:

EES   90.63%
Enron India  85.71%
Enron Wind  81.85%
Net Works  71.35%
EE&CC   66.67%
NEPCO   59.95%
Corporate  58.74%
Enron South America 58.24%

COMPANY AVERAGE 54.64%

ENA/EGM/EIM  52.76%
ETS (formerly GPG) 49.59%
Enron Europe  39.95%
EBS   39.07%
APACHI  26.90%

On behalf of Mark Frevert, I would like to ask each of you to personally
encourage your direct reports to log on to the system at survey.enron.com and
provide the much needed feedback.  Whether you send an e-mail, use a staff
meeting or walk around to your employees' desks, we need you to let them know
that the survey is important to Enron and we would appreciate their
feedback.  While many fear some sort of response tracking, please remind them
that their responses are completely confidential.

If you have any questions, please call me at ext. 3-9053.

Operating Company:

ENA/EGM/EIM    1,213
Total employee only email invitations sent: 2,299
Percent complete:    52.76%

Results by Group within Operating Company:

Commercial - Origination  225
Risk Management and Trading 213
Energy Operations   205
Bus. An. & Rep./Fin. Ops.  154
Other/None of the Above  153
Legal    89
Gas Assets   50
Human Resources   41
Tax    29
Technology/IT   28


Kay -

Do we have any CA's with Accenture?

Please let me know when you have a chance.

Thanks.

Mark


Date:    July 24, 2001

To:        CMTA Members

From:    Delette Speelmon

Please let me know if your company has, or will be cutting a check to
Edison to repay any discount received under interruptible program
contracts.

We are working on legislation that would allow companies to keep a
proportionate amount of the discount received between November 2000 and
January 26, 2001, based on the company's level of compliance when called
to curtail.

Thank you.

Delette Speelmon
Director, Energy & Technology
dspeelmon@cmta.net

 - groyer.vcf


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their Manager. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000031063&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000031063
Request Create Date : 4/25/01 8:04:17 AM
Requested For       : louise.kitchen@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\nahoutrd\houston\pwr\common\Electric - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


This is what I show what the partnership has done with TXU
Thanks
Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Lynn Handlin [mailto:lhandli1@txu.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:59 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: Ponderosa

Joe - can you send me an updated spreadsheet with all business through March 31

Thanks
Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Handlin/ENERGY/TXU on 03/27/2002 12:58
PM ---------------------------

Ken Fowler@TXUB
03/27/2002 10:16 AM

To:   Lynn Handlin/ENERGY/TXU@TXUE
cc:

Subject:  Ponderosa

Lynn, Mike at Ponderosa says they won't be using the credit of approximately
$380,000 that they have on their account, due to the prepays, for the rest of
the month.  He wants to know if we will send it back.  What do you think?

thanks
Ken


Just between you and me, I'm astonished -- delighted but astonished, that
they fugured their way through all of those Japanese holidays and the
aftermath.

I'm told that the advice from Japanese counsel was recieved yesterday but I
haven't read it yet.  I don't anitcipate any problems.  I can't tell from
these e-mails if they are talikng about sending out initial packets on May 11
or going live for Japanese counterparties then (all of whom must then have
already executed PAs and been approved).

Louise Kitchen
03/15/2000 04:12 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Timing of EOL Introduction

Japanese PAs?
---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 15/03/2000
16:12 ---------------------------

Joseph P Hirl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
15/03/2000 16:41
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Timing of EOL Introduction

Mine is on 11 May.  Sounds like a good excuse for a party.

Joe

I am getting in touch with Thomas/Chismar in Singapore to ensure they are
prepared.  Also our list of potential contacts is being refined and would
hope to have it relatively complete by early next week.  Our local PR firm
has suggested that we translate the basic EOL brochure into Japanese.  We are
moving forward with this.  I do not expect to require any further
localization at this point.  Our local attornies are getting back before the
end of the week with final comments on the plan, contracts, etc.

Joe

Louise Kitchen@ECT
03/16/2000 03:10 AM
To: Joseph P Hirl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Timing of EOL Introduction

Its my birthday - May 9.

But if those are the dates OK.

Joseph P Hirl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/03/2000 23:51
To: Louise Kitchen@ECT
cc: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Timing of EOL Introduction

Louise,

Given the comments below, could we move the roll out to 10-12 May?

Joe
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph P Hirl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/13/2000 03:50 PM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  John Ambler                           03/11/2000 01:28 PM

To: Joseph P Hirl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Nicholas O'Day/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Timing of EOL Introduction

Joe,

In talking with Nick yesterday evening, I learned that most people are off in
Japan during the week of May 1.  April 29 and May 3 through 5 are all
national holidays (Greenery Day, Constitution Day, National Holiday and
Children's Day respectively).  Furthermore, Nick advises that many people
start the holiday week early and stretch it into the following week.  This
makes our selection of May 1 week for EOL a most unsatisfactory choice.   I
would recommend that we shoot for May 10 or 11 (which would conflict with
possible high profile participation in an APEC meeting, which I'll be
managing) or preferably the week of May 15.  We could introduce EOL earlier,
but publicity would be reduced given Rebecca's schedule for interviews and
lead time for printing/mailing promotional packets.  It would be very tight,
but we could do it the week of April 24.  Rebecca could provide overview
interviews, supplemented by an EOL demonstration and your explanation of how
this provides a platform to build our business.  Do you have
preferences/limitations from a business activity perspective?  Unless you
object, on Monday I'll get recommendations from our PR firm and also check
Louise's availability/desire to be part of the EOL introduction.

John


Dave:
I expect to receive from our counsel in Mexico a memo addressing all of the
online issues that we have asked them to address in the next day or so as I
spoke with them yesterday about this.  I will need to review the memo with
them and Mark Taylor to make sure that all of the issues have been adequately
addressed and to determine if any changes need to be made to the documents.
From my conversations with them, there don't appear to be any major issues
other than the fact that we cannot offer "securities" to Mexican
counterparties and they will define in the memo what products would be
considered securities, but I want to see waht they put down in writing before
we make any conclusions.  I or Mark will keep you posted.

Carol

	David Forster@ENRON
	07/06/2000 03:59 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Mexico

Carol,

Could you please update me on the status of PA and ETA preparation for Mexico?

Thanks,

Dave


Do you have deal #'s for any of the following?

JayBee Oil        term 12/1/00 --11/30/01         5000MMBtu
                         12/1/00 - 11/30/02       45000MM
Kaplan Interests term 12/1/00 - 11/30/00 3300 MMBtu

Blauser Well Services
  term 12/1/00 - 10/31/01
  1250 MMBtu

Cedar Resources
 term 12/1/01  1500 MMBtu
 12/1/00  11/30/02  1000 MMBtu

These are all App. producer transactions.

Thanks

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Jeff,

My name is Kurt Lindahl.  I recently joined Enron Global Markets on the LNG
team.  I'm the Lead Developer for the West Coast and have been charged with
building a (several) LNG terminal(s) on the west coast.  Michael McGarry,
from Enron Engineering and Operational Services Company, is the lead
Development Engineer on the project.

A key question in this effort is, "Where is the best entry point into the
Socal/SG&E/PG&E pipeline systems.  In other words, where can we site a LNG
terminal and deliver natural gas into their systems, such that the amount of
facilities they require is minimal?  I spoke with Ben Asante who heads up the
optimization department in ETS.  He said that if we could get annual flow
diagrams for the California intrastate systems, he could prepare a model in
about 2 weeks time.  Interstate pipelines have to file Annual Flow Diagrams
at FERC, but I'm not sure what Intrastates' are obligated to file with the
CPUC?  That's where I need your help.  This is a hot subject, because the
race to site an LNG terminal is intense.

Could you please call me at 713 345 5044 (O) or 713 515 2759 so that we can
discuss.  We want to keep this effort very confidential, so please maintain
secrecy.

I will also want to talk to you about permitting and state approvals.

Regards,

Kurt Lindahl


Melissa/Darren

Global Contract #96045720
Cokinos/Tri-C has elected to price their production for the month of April
2001 as follows:

4,000/d, 97% IF/HSC
all production in excess of 4,000/d priced 97% Gas Daily

Thank you,
Michael


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 03/08/2000
08:21 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           03/07/2000 06:05 PM

To: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan@Enron, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Order 637: TW Comment on Rehearing Request

With regard to the Commission's limitations on the right of first refusal,
Order 637 provides for grandfathering of discounted long-term contracts that
are now subject to ROFR.  The Commission's rationale was that grandfathering
gives all shippers notice of the new limitation and the opportunity to
re-execute current contracts.  The TW Commercial Group has asked whether we
should challenge the grandfathering of existing contracts.  In limiting the
right of first refusal, the Commission has expressly acknowledged that if a
customer is truly captive and has no alternatives for service, it is likely
that its contract will be at the maximum rate.  Shippers that are not captive
and have alternatives in the marketplace do not need the protection of ROFR,
and the pipeline should be able to negotiate with other interested shippers
upon expiration of the contract.

In light of these conclusions, there should be no reason to grandfather the
ROFR rights of shippers under existing discounted contracts.  Such shippers
would not be harmed by removal of the right immediately upon the effective
date of a pipeline's tariff filing to limit the right of first refusal
(assuming the service contract incorporates tariff terms on an "as amended"
basis).  Consistent with the Commission's order, it would not be unfair to
make these shippers compete with others for the capacity upon expiration of
the contract.


fyi

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Gramlich [mailto:thegramlich4@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:26 AM
To: Belden, Tim
Subject: RE: Chairman-to-be Wood's assistant

Got the offer.

--- "Belden, Tim" <Tim.Belden@ENRON.com> wrote:
> Good luck with this.  I would be happy to serve as a
> reference.  I don't
> know anybody else who is applying for this job, so
> have no conflict
> there.  I don't personally have any relationship
> with Commissioner Wood
> or anyone on his staff and would be surprised if
> they called me.  But if
> they do, I shall sing your praises.  Hope all is
> well with you.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Gramlich [mailto:thegramlich4@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:05 PM
> To: jim.steffes@enron.com; Dasovich, Jeff; Belden,
> Tim
> Subject: Chairman-to-be Wood's assistant
>
>
> Jim, Jeff, and Tim,
> I hope all is well.  I often wish I were on the
> Portland trading floor in that gov't affairs job but
> that's history and my family is here in DC where
> they
> correctly thought they belonged.  I'm writing
> because
> I just interviewed to be Pat Wood's technical
> advisor,
> one of FERC's top positions, and wanted to alert you
> that I mentioned you and your group as a reference.
> I
> hope that is ok; in my view we parted on good terms.
>
> He gave me the impression that I am very much in the
> running.  I don't know if Enron people are applying
> and don't want to compete with them.  But I think
> I'm
> generally on the same page with you on policy issues
> and I expect you would favor having more familiarity
> with markets and market-oriented policies on staff
> there.  Given your companies longstanding
> relationship
> with Wood I thought you might be consulted on this.
> If so, I am asking for your support.
> Thanks!
> Rob Gramlich
> 301-280-6195
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant
> messaging with Yahoo!
> Messenger
> http://im.yahoo.com
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or
> its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential
> and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
> attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer
> (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
> (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
> recipient or any other party, and may not be relied
> on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
> or otherwise. Thank you.
>
**********************************************************************

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/13/2001 10:05 AM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	03/13/2001 08:50 AM

		 To: <gfergus@brobeck.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <rsanders@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: Colleges Sue Enron for Pulling Power Plug

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Tue, 13 Mar
2001 08:01:23 -0600 -----
To:	"Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com>,
"Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Gene Godley" <ggodley@bracepatt.com>, "Kimberly
Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Michael Pate" <mpate@bracepatt.com>, "Paul
Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>,
"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	Colleges Sue Enron for Pulling Power Plug
FYI

Colleges Sue Enron for Pulling Power Plug / UC, CSU Say Firm Plans Resale at
Higher Price
( March 13, 2001 )

The University of California and the California State University system are
accusing energy giant Enron of breaking contracts to provide low-cost
electricity to state campuses so the company can sell the power at higher
prices on the spot market.

      The two university systems are asking a federal judge to block the
Houston-based energy broker from abandoning four-year contracts. Those
contracts guaranteed the universities a reliable supply of power at prices 5
percent below the capped rate created under the state's 1996 deregulation
law.

      The schools say Enron Energy Systems Inc., which promised them
protection from the uncertainties of California's deregulation, is now trying
to force them to rely on Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and Southern California
Edison -- the two utilities nearly bankrupted by skyrocketing electricity
prices.

      Enron says the universities will still be guaranteed the price provided
in the contracts until the deals run out in March 2002. But at least some of
the electricity will now have to be purchased for the campuses by the state
Department of Water Resources on the expensive spot market.

      Prices on the short-term market can be many times greater than prices
in long-term deals like those between Enron and the universities. The state
or utilities, which cannot charge customers the full cost of electricity
because of the rate cap, would be liable for the difference between the
current utility rate and the spot market cost.

      The state, which stepped in as buyer of power in January after the
debt-ridden utilities defaulted on payments to power plants, has already
spent $3.2 billion buying electricity for utility customers. If Enron gets
out of its contracts with UC and CSU, the state also would have to buy as
much as 450 megawatts for the two universities. That's enough to power
450,000 homes.

      In a civil complaint filed Friday in federal court in Oakland, the
universities contend that Enron wants to be free to take advantage of soaring
market prices for electricity by reselling low-cost power it controls under
contracts originally meant to serve the college campuses.

      "Enron is seeking to capitalize on the energy crisis to reap enormous
profits," the civil suit alleges.

      Enron spokeswoman Peggy Mahoney denied the accusation.

      "We do not have any power purchased in blocks," Mahoney said. "It is
fundamentally not true."

      Nettie Hoge, executive director of the Utility Reform Network in San
Francisco, called the move by Enron "outrageous."

      "These people have been gouging us and making profits," she said. "If
they are making less on some long-term contracts, they should stay with it."

      Marty Sunde, vice chairman of Enron Energy Services, said he was
"shocked" by the lawsuit and believes it is driven by fear of the unknown.

      "We absolutely, positively are honoring our contract," Sunde said.
"(The universities) have a 5 percent discount off the frozen tariff rate."

      Mahoney said Enron will continue to honor other terms of the contracts
by providing billing and advice on how the colleges can minimize their energy
use.

      But Eric Behrens, an attorney for UC, said Enron cannot fulfill those
parts of the contracts because it has asked the utilities to rip out
thousands of meters that provided information to the company about
electricity use on the campuses. The utilities are installing their own
meters at the schools.

      Behrens said UC, one of the largest single users of electricity in the
state, went through a laborious process to shift onto Enron's system,
spending $1,500 for each of the 2,000 new meters.

      Even if Enron honors the low rate until the contracts expire, Behrens
said, its abrogation of the deals could expose UC and CSU to extra costs of
as much as $297 million in coming years by forcing them to become utility
customers again.

      Those customers will probably have to cover a major share of the
billions in debt that the utilities and the state have racked up over the
past year as wholesale prices for power went through the roof.

      Until Feb. 1, when Enron took steps to drop them, the universities were
so-called direct access customers of Enron. Direct access, a key piece of the
state's deregulation plan, was originally intended to lower prices for
consumers by allowing companies to compete with the utilities.

      But the state Legislature, concerned that too many customers were
fleeing the utilities, recently passed a bill that could suspend any new
contracts under the direct access program.

      Mahoney said Enron is being forced to release all its direct access
customers because the debt-laden utilities have stopped paying Enron and
other providers a required rebate.

      Other residential and institutional customers also are being returned
to the utilities. Enron, for example, is returning the San Francisco Giants
to PG&E even though the energy company signed a contract to provide
electricity to Pacific Bell Park through 2010.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Daniel
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:41 AM
To:	Benson, Robert; Bishop, Serena; Brodeur, Stephane; Coffing, Timothy; Driscoll, Michael M.; Ermis, Frank; Fischer, Mark; Guzman, Mark; Mallory, Chris; Slinger, Ryan; Thomas, Paul; Thomas, Paul D.
Subject:	you don't need access to stack manager?
Importance:	High

I assume that since you didn't respond to my first two emails, none of you require access to stack manager.  If this is incorrect, please respond to my previous emails.

Thanks,

Dan

Subject:	Waiting on your reply -Stack Users

If you're receiving this email its because we're still waiting on a response from you.  Please reply to this message ASAP.  See below for details.

Thanks,

Dan

We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop (stand alone computer).

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


Phillip:  I will copy you on this e-mial while Mike is out.  Let me know if
you have any questions.  Thank you.

Anne


Attached is a draft of the declaratory judgment action prepared by Baker
Botts, our outside counsel on this matter.  A conscious effort has been made
for the petition to be short and sweet.  However, we need to make sure the
underlying facts and the history of the transaction are described properly.

Please take a few moments to review this draft and forward me any comments by
e-mail or fax (713-646-3490).

Thanks.

 - Petition for Declaratory Relief.DOC


PJM filed its RTO filing yesterday.  I am getting a copy emailed from their
Washington attorney.  When I get it, I will forward it.  In the meantime, a
news release and summary is attached.


Did you loose a pair of black sandals for a small boy child?  If so, please see me.


Dear john,

Good news !

Your order # WB-000325484 has been shipped.

SKU#       Quantity     Item Description               Total
T009201      1          Color Ink Cartridge          $29.95

          Subtotal:       $29.95
          Sales Tax:      $0.00
          Shipping:       $0.00

          Total:          $29.95

$29.95 will be charged to your credit card for these items.

If your order was shipped via UPS or Federal Express,
you can track the progress of your shipment by
clicking on the following link:

http://wwwapps.ups.com/tracking/tracking.cgi?tracknum=1Z9100X40309422575

If you have any questions, please reply to epsonstoreorders@ea.epson.com.
If you prefer, you can call us at 1-800-873-7766
between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Pacific Time, Monday through Friday.
Please be sure to reference your order number with any inquiries.

Thank you for choosing Epson products. We look forward to serving
you again in the near future.

Sincerely,

Customer Service
epsonstoreorders@ea.epson.com


Sheila,
	I have received a few phone calls from Utilicorp (Keith Milem) stating they are unhappy with the removal of Scheduled Quantity report. Not only do their schedulers use this report on a daily basis, their accounting personnel use it to tie out volumes at the end of the month.  Thanks.

Randy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Berger, Larry; Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Zadow, Raetta; Barry, Patrick; Blair, Jean; Bryan, Randy; Callans, Nancy; Carr, James; Clapper, Karen; Perry, Renee; Porter, Diana; Walden, Shirley; Washington, Kathy; Wilkens, Jerry; Bastida, Nancy; Brostad, Karen; Brown, Elizabeth; Carrillo, Alma; Carter, Zuela; Dasilva, Esther; Davis, Larry; Eldridge, Dale; Green, Alma; Hanagriff, Richard; Johnson, Alice; Lee, Dennis; Steele, Patricia; Trevino, Linda; Vasquez, Josue; Aldinger, William; Collins, Marion; Conklin, Jacob; Coon, Galen; Cooper, Tim; Cramer, James; Howard, Jack; Laferla, Lynda ; Phillips, Mary; Rivers, Cynthia; Betancourt, Ramona ; Black, Legale ; Draemer, Mary ; Kuehl, Toby; Matheson, Maggie; Medeles, Gerry; Skertich, Gerald; Studebaker, James ; Summers, Toby; Adams, Jean; Benningfield, Robert; Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris; Hibbard, Scott; Janzen, Randy; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Scurlock, Debra; Sturr, Kathy; Vaughan, Cara; Woodson, Harry; Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Chris L; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila; Blair, Lynn
Subject:	FW: Scheduled Qty Report

FYI:

Teams--Let me know if you've received calls from unhappy shippers regarding the removal of the "Scheduled Quantity reports for Shippers" in TMS!!  We've been getting miscellaneous messages that customers are unhappy with this change--need some immediate feedback!  Thks! Sheila


Your GMAT class will be held in ECN 560, which is in the old Enron building.
The first meeting will be held from 6-10 PM, but the others will be from 6-9
PM.  If you have any questions, please call.

John Lewis
Director of Course Operations
The Princeton Review - Houston
(713)688-5500
JohnL@review.com


----- Forwarded by Rob Walls/NA/Enron on 01/12/2001 04:09 PM -----

	Allen W Ueckert
	01/02/2001 02:11 PM

		 To: Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Kent Castleman
		 Subject: ECI Payment Summary

Rob - attached is a summary of the payments we have paid to ECI, per our
accounting records.  If you need the back-up for these numbers, let me know
and I can forward this to you.

Let us know if you have any questions.

Allen

---------------------- Forwarded by Allen W Ueckert/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001
02:03 PM ---------------------------

Thach C Phan
01/02/2001 01:46 PM
To: Allen W Ueckert/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: ECI Payment Summary

Allen,
Attached is the ECI Payment Summary file.
Thach


Hi Team,

Just wanted to clarify some decisions arising out of last week's N-Form Team meeting regarding the Working Environment policy...

Remove the phrase, "...and the use of other tobacco products..." from the activities limited by our smoking policy, as employees in field locations regularly use these products, and enforcement would be virtually impossible.
Clarify acceptable locations for smoking activity, as the definition for "workplace" used for alcohol and drugs is too narrow for smoking.
Review "workplace" definition...this is a composite from several sources...please provide feedback as to whether it should be revised, i.e. Michelle suggested adding "parking lots."

Workplace - Includes all Enron premises and any location where company business is being conducted or in which employees perform essential job functions, including all property, land, onshore and offshore platforms, office buildings, structures, installations, training facilities, plants, pipelines, boats, aircraft, and vehicles which are Enron-owned, leased, used, or operated, or which are located on Company property; as well as fenced areas to which general public access is denied or limited by Enron.  Also covered are any personal effects or items, including desks, lockers, workstations, personal belongings, and privately owned vehicles located on or in Company property.

Leave in the phrase, "...attending an Enron-sponsored function off Company premises..." in referencing locations where an employee should not be impaired by alcohol or drugs, as reasonable efforts are made to provide safe transportation and/or other options for impaired employees at Enron-sponsored social functions.
Add references to the state and federal Drug Free Workplace Act and non-DOT policies.
Stance on driving safety proposal is to state that the use of communication devices while driving poses a significant risk and that employees should comply with applicable law and business unit practices.
Michelle - in your notes, you commented, "What about drug testing?"  How much and which information would you like to see on this topic?

Have I missed anything?

Thanks so much for your time and assistance,
Karen

Karen Phillips
HR Associate
Enron North America
Business Consultants
713-345-4953


----> Snowball Fight! and Why Women Talk so Much! by Send4fun!

Snowball Fight! Splat! Get Your Friends Too!
http://www.send4fun.com/snowballfight.htm
Snowball Fight!

Why Women Talk so Much (SEE WHY!)
http://www.send4fun.com/talk.htm
Why Women Talk so Much

Publishers Clearing House will award their $10,000,000.00 SuperPrize(tm)live on TV Super Bowl(tm) Sunday! We've arranged a special opportunity for you to get 10 CHANCES TO WIN this spectacular SuperPrize(tm) right now!
Click here to claim these 10 entries to be a multi-millionaire...
http://www.flowgo.com/page.cfm?a=10615
AOL Link

Prison Vs. Work (Which Is Better?!)
http://www.send4fun.com/prison.htm

Prison Vs. Work

Germs (Start A SMILEY Epidemic!!)
http://www.send4fun.com/germs.htm
Germs

Classmates truly is the world's best place to reunite with your old friends with more than 24 million registered high school alumni!!! Find your friends today..
http://www.flowgo.com/page.cfm?a=10616
AOL Link

Send a Puppy (Awwww so cute!)
http://www.send4fun.com/sendapuppy/index.htm
Send a Puppy

Harry Potter 3 Poster Set. Only $9.95. Click here for details.
http://www.flowgo.com/page.cfm?a=10617
AOL Link

Thanks for Visiting, Everybody!
-------

Send 4 Fun is a FlowGo newsletter.  For more information on FlowGo or to unsubscribe from Send 4 Fun follow the links below:

FlowGo
http://www.flowgo.com/

Privacy Policy
http://flowgo.com/privacy.html

Unsubscribe

http://www.flowgo.com/unsub.cfm?sid=2746140&u=-10408&l=13&m=11574

Unsubscribe


All,

RRL, a new counterparty, has applied for EOL access to trade gas, crude and
weather derivatives. Since the company is "A" rated by S&P and has strong
operating performance, Credit does not have any issues extending a tentative
threshold of $10MM. The issue resides in the confirmation of the deals. All
weather transactions must be confirmed under an ISDA or Deemed ISDA, and then
we encounter netting problems with the Deemed ISDA and the normal EOL
confirm.  I am going to prepare and ISDA worksheet to start the negotiation
process. In the interim, all deals MUST BE confirmed under a Deemed ISDA.

Darren Vanek


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

February 16, 2001 5:00pm through February 20, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

3 ALLEN CENTER POWER OUTAGE:
Time:  Sat 2/17/2001 at  2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  8:00:00 PM London thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
There will be a power outage in 3AC Saturday afternoon for regular building
maintenance. Floors B2 through 3AC5 will be without power. The routers for
the 3AC building are located on the 6th floor, so network connectivity for
all of the 3AC floors will be down for this time. Facility service outages
include electricity, heating, ventilation & air conditioning.
All EI Notes Servers will be down because of this outage.
 Contact(s): Randy Lord      713-345-7707
                   Ken Berryman   713-853-9295

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: .
Impact:
Time:  Sat 2/17/2001 at  8:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  3:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  6:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  1:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  2:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/17/2001 at 9:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Annual Maintenance of UPS "B" & "C"
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Required for continued reliability of equipment
Backout: Cancel if storms are present in the area.
Contact(s):  Randy Lord  713-345-7707

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  EES
Time:  Sun 2/18/2001 at  3:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  3:15:00 PM CT
 Sun 2/18/2001 at  1:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  1:15:00 PM PT
 Sun 2/18/2001 at  9:00:00 PM London thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  9:15:00 PM London
Outage:  EES ATM Reboot
Environments Impacted:  EES, EBS
Purpose: Routers have an instability, Cisco is unable to provide fix at this
time, we will reboot routers at scheduled time
Backout: none
Contact(s):  Vincent Fox      713-853-5337

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 2/16/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/16/2001 at  11:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 2/16/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/16/2001 at     9:15:00 PM PT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  5:15:00 AM London
Outage:  Migrate Servers to 6500
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: Additional stability, retirement of 2924
Backout: Move connections back to 2924
Contact(s):  Vincent Fox    713-853-5337

Impact:  EES
Time:  Fri 2/16/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/16/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 2/16/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/16/2001 at     9:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Migration of 10th Floor
Environments Impacted:  EES
Purpose: Migration away from ATM.
Backout: Change configuration to point to old router
Contact(s):  Vincent Fox      713-853-5337

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:
Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 2/16/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 2/16/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/16/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EI Notes Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EI Local/Domestic/Foreign Sites
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  David Ricafrente    713-646-7741

Impact:  Corp Notes
Time:  Fri 2/16/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 2/16/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/16/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  cNotes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: Make sure server comes up.
Contact(s):  Trey Rhodes  (713) 345-7792

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 2/16/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 2/16/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at 2:00:00 AM London thru Mon 2/19/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London
Outage:  NEW HR DB / DB Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  All including HR GlobalApps users but not limited to
the following: Business Objects users, GIS, GCS, ExpertFinder,
Global
                                    Launch Zone, eHROnline.
Purpose: We will be moving the existing DB to a new and upgraded server.  We
will be building the new DBs for current and future Corporate HR Apps.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Brandon Bangerter   713-345-4904
  Raj Perubhatla  713-345-8016  281-788-9307
  Brian Ellis  713-345-8017  713-446-6193

Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 2/16/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 2/16/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/16/2001 at    10:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Move EI routers from 3ac17 to 3ac35
Environments Impacted:  EI
Purpose: Room that routers are in being torn down.
Backout: Move everything back to where it was.
Contact(s):  Garhett Clark    713-345-9953

Impact:  All Enron Domains
Time:  Wed 2/7/2001 at  5:15:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Wed 2/7/2001 at  3:15:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Wed 2/7/2001 at  11:15:00 PM London thru Sat 2/24/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Net IQ installation to the ENW networks
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: To improve up-time and application monitoring and performance.  Long
term, this product will replace NetHealth.
Backout: Remove the Agent that gets installed on the local machines.
Contact(s):  John Setliff  713-345-3186  877-342-3093
  Keith Meurer    713-853-1743

Impact:  IPT
Time:  Mon 2/12/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Mon 2/12/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Mon 2/12/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Mon 2/19/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
London
Outage:  Migrating new office, Intergrated Process Technologies, to Enron
Standards
Environments Impacted:  IPT
Purpose: Intergrated Process Technologies (IPT) is a company that Enron has
recently acquired.  Migrating the network to conform to Enron standards.
Backout: Move back to existing equipment.
Contact(s):  Stanley Joe  281-830-7044 (cell)      713-288-3209 (pager)

SITARA:
Impact:  Sitara
Time:  Sat 2/17/2001 at  6:45:00 PM CT thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  6:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  4:45:00 PM PT thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  4:00:00 AM PT
 Sun 2/18/2001 at  12:45:00 AM London thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  12:00:00 PM
London
Outage:  Sitara
Environments Impacted:  Sitara Users
Purpose: Sitara will be down for database hardware upgrade.
Backout:
Contact(s):  sitara oncall    713-288-0101

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:  All
Time:  Sat 2/17/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 2/18/2001 at 1:00:00 AM London thru Sun 2/18/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Lucent Switch Software Upgrade
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: To allow for ATM network backbone. Calls made during the second or
two the swithover of processors occurs,
                       could cause a call to be dropped and the user will
have to redial. This upgrade does not affect voicemail.
Backout: Back-up optical disks will be used to reload all translations.
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard      713-853-0558

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 2/17/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 2/17/2001 at  3:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/17/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Unify application middle tier server moves to ardmore (fava,navy,
lima and soy).
Environments Impacted:  Unify Users
Purpose: Physically moving unify application servers to ardmore to be on the
same network as the unify production gas database.  All unify production will
eventually be at Ardmore on the same network.. Unify production finance
database will move to a server at Armore this weekend as well.
Backout: These must  be done.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-1741 OR (888)853-9797


Greetings Everyone --

You may have noticed that your paycheck stubs reflect vacation and sick leave
balances that are inaccurate.  Due to EWC being acquired mid calendar year,
and GE "grandfathering" in our vacation levels, the balances as stated on
your check stub will differ from your actual balances.  So, for the balance
of this calendar year (2002), all vacation and sick time balances will be
tracked locally on our own HRIS System (at GE Wind in Tehachapi).

Human Resources will provide you with your true balances by the following
method:

The first of every month Human Resources will print out a hard copy of your
vacation and sick leave balances.
Employees located in the North and South Tehachapi facilities will be able to
pick up a hard copy of their balances from their respective facility
receptionists.
Remote site employees' balances will be mailed to the respective Site
Supervisors for distribution.

Thank you for your continued understanding through the integration process.


You blew me off!  Are you in town?  I tried your phone but it's busy.  df


I will definitely think about it...I would just feel bad though missing the event since I talked to Barrett (Deborah's fiancee) all about the big day at Lisa and Brad's wedding.  What may be an option is me taking part or all of Monday off and just heading to Austin Sunday and coming back Monday...I'll talk to my trader about the possibility.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  "corey leahy" <celeahy@hotmail.com>                           04/24/2001 03:07 PM

To:	Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Re: This Weekend...

I think you can skip Deborah's wedding.  Your good excuse is that I have to
work the next weekend.  Starting on Thursday (the 10th), I have to do Law
Review stuff until the issue we are working on is finished.  It could be two
weeks-- it could be right up until I have to start work...  I don't really
know.  Of course, I won't be working all day everyday, so we could do
dinner, a movie, etc. that weekend.

I don't want to encourage you not to go to Deborah's wedding, but, frankly,
I am all weddinged out.  Have you made plans to go with anyone?  Maybe
something could mysteriously come up...

Oh well-- it's up to you-- you could decide next Saturday if you want to...

-Corey

>From: Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
>To: celeahy@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: This Weekend...
>Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:59:46 -0500
>
>
>I've got Deborah Vest's wedding next weekend so that's a no go, but I was
>thinking about coming up the weekend of the 12th so maybe that will work.
>I would actually love to skip out on the wedding...however, since the
>wedding's in Houston and I live here, I don't have a very good excuse do I?
>
>And don't worry...we could wait two years and I'd still want to chat about
>Vegas.  One of those things you'll never really forget.  I'm sure I sounded
>funny and I was definitely tired, but in now way were either of these bad
>things.
>
>Sue
>
>
>
>
>  (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
>  image moved
>  to file:      From:  "corey leahy"
>  pic25990.pcx) <celeahy@hotmail.com>
>                04/24/2001 02:47 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>To:   Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: This Weekend...
>
>
>Here is my suggestion--
>
>Let's push everything back one week.  My finals are finished Saturday
>morning (the 5th), and we could go to Barton Springs immediately afterward,
>and eat dinner, and rent a movie, and shop on Sunday, etc.
>
>I am really so behind on my school work that I can't justify taking time
>off
>this weekend.  I would try my hardest, but I just don't think I would be
>very much fun.
>
>However, I would love to talk about Vegas.  I've been wondering about it
>because I thought you sounded funny.  Maybe you were just tired.
>
>Let me know.
>
>-Corey
>
> >From: Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
> >To: celeahy@hotmail.com
> >Subject: This Weekend...
> >Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:00:59 -0500
> >
> >Okay, so I'd really like to make a trip up there this weekend ( I haven't
> >spent a weekend in Houston during April and can't imagine why I wouldn't
> >just make the month a clean sweep).  Anyway, I know you're unbelievably
> >busy right now and spending an entire weekend with me would not help you
>in
> >the least...So, here's my suggestion:
> >
> >I could either come up Friday night and we could do a late dinner (say
> >8:30-9:00 ) and then find someplace to hang out for a while or just rent
>a
> >movie.  On Saturday we could get up, work out, grab something for
> >brunch/lunch and maybe even go to Barton Springs (depending on the
>weather)
> >and then I could take off and leave you the rest of Saturday and all of
> >Sunday to work (we could even skip the Barton Springs piece).
> >
> >The other option is to just shift everything a day forward...I'd come up
>on
> >Saturday and leave Sunday.
> >
> >Either give me a call or email me if either of these sound good to you.
>I
> >will also completely understand if you just really need to work/study
>this
> >weekend.
> >
> >Sue
> >
> >PS - I'm dying for someone to chat with about Vegas...can't really talk
>to
> >my roommate since it was work related.
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
><< pic25990.pcx >>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Leslie Sara, and Brent:

Could I get an update on were we are with the top 20 customer amendments.  Last week we got 5 amendments for power physical but we still haven't received any amendments for financial.  Entergy-Koch is very interested in ConfirmLogic and have asked for the amendments.  When can we get the amendments for Entergy-Koch completed?

Thanks,
KC


Sheila, should this account be placed on the high priority list?  Also, to
whom in legal did you send the info?

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3875
(713) 345-4693

	Sheila Glover@ECT
	02/12/2001 11:57 AM

		 To: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: J.P. Morgan Chase Futures Agreement

Cassandra, Bill and Cheryl,
We have sent to legal a request to open a new Futures Clearing Agreement with
JP Morgan Chase.  Gary is requesting that we establish this account to
provide additional coverage for Rate & Currency  and Equity Products.  Carr
and Pru have lost some key persons and service levels are not deemed to be as
good as previously.
Thanks.
Sheila


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000
12:08 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Amanda Huble @ ENRON                           09/18/2000 10:53 AM

To: Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff
Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EDI Discussion

Please plan to attend a meeting on Tuesday, September 19, in EB3084.

Thank you,
Amanda Huble


Vince:

I enjoyed meeting you last week to discuss my application to join your group.
Please keep my inquiry confidential for now.

If selected, I think your group would greatly benefit from my diverse
skill-set including modeling skills utilizing Excel, Access, and
Bloomberg as well as graphing, statistical, and other quantitative abilities,
especially in the meteorology field.

I am particularly interested in being able to discover vital information
which may affect the markets (e.g. pulp/paper, interest rates, weather) as
well as arriving at a new variable which captures all market variables into
one which may be followed and forecasted for each of the groups.

Furthermore, I am truly committed to adding value to your group, including
making significant contributions,
and am sanguine about my ability to ensure that these achievements are
well-received.

I have met many people at Enron thus far and am able to utilize these
strategic alliances by knowing who may be able
to assist your group in the quest for information on different projects. By
accessing information quickly, both internal and
external to the firm, the group would be able to extraordinarily benefit from
this diligence  In addition, by seeking greater efficiencies in my work,
I have been able to be instrumental in accumulating additional
responsibilities.

Most importantly, I have the mathematical acumen and insight to ensure the
continued growth and prosperity of your group.

As a research-oriented individual, I am clearly interested in pursuing a
position in your  group.
If selected, I would be able to bring my diverse experience, including
financial modeling and derivatives, from my tenure at
Enron and CIBC World Markets.

I look forward to meeting with select members of your group.

Thanks,
David
3-3528


Larry- Thanks for the update. I am glad that the operating hours in the
alternative scenario for BOTH STATIONS are agreeable to Transwestern. I will
be sending the permits to EPA review today with a request for an expedited
review.

The public notice period starts today, so i trust that the notice signs are
posted outside your facilities.

Shudeish
____________________________________________________
>>> <Larry.Campbell@enron.com> 10/15/01 11:33AM >>>

Shudeish, the spreadsheets look great.  I spoke to the project engineer
about an hour ago and he told me that we can live with the numbers you have
given us in the permits for Stations 1 and 2 under the alternate operating
scenerio.  He has been in Boliva for the past 2 weeks and was unavailable
for comments.  Please accept my gratitude for all the extra work and effort
you have put in on this issue of operating hour under the alternative
operating scenerio.  We are going to accept the hours as stated in the
permits.  Thanks very much


Attached are copies of the ETA, PA and GTC which were attached to David
Minns' email of Feb. 28.

David: Please let me know if this date (and therefore these copies) represent
your final drafts.

Mark: Please let me know if you have any comments on the attached, or if you
are happy to approve them as is.

I note that the GTC still needs a GST clause.

Thanks,

Dave


<<GE.LegalOpin.DOC>>  <<GE.Consent.DOC>>  <<GE.Receipt.DOC>>
<<GE.Ltr.Forms.DOC>>

Kay:

We have attached execution copies of the following documents for execution
by GE:

1.  GE Letter re Forms of Agreement;
2.  GE Consent and Agreement;
3.  Legal Opinion of Counsel to GE;
4.  GE Receipt.

These documents were circulated by Isabel Parker to Kent Shoemaker, you, me
and others on April 23, 2001.

The only other document is the GE Parent Guaranty.  Greg Lang circulated
comments (in a PDF file) by an e-mail 4/18 at 5:59 p.m.   Greg asked earlier
today whether the form of this document had been agreed by GE and I could
not respond.

You should have the following documents:

1.  Assignment and Assumption Agreement; and
2.  Turbine Contract.

Several of the ENA documents are not yet finalized, so I will try to get
those to you after lunch.  Please send over the LLC certificate book in
order that we may prepare membership certificates.

If you have any questions or comments, please advise.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - GE.LegalOpin.DOC
 - GE.Consent.DOC
 - GE.Receipt.DOC
 - GE.Ltr.Forms.DOC


go to aimr.com


The entire book is being sent to you via a separate e-mail.  This is the
two-page spread that highlights "making markets".

Marge
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron on 03/14/2001
05:18 PM ---------------------------
MARGE NADASKY @
ECT
03/09/2001 06:45 PM

To: Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Volatile markets spread

---------------------- Forwarded by Marge Nadasky/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 06:45
PM ---------------------------

"Monica Zalta" <Monica.Zalta@darcyww.com> on 03/09/2001 06:38:52 PM
To: <marge.nadasky@enron.com>
cc: <jmandelker@aol.com>

Subject: Volatile markets spread

Voila.

 - Page 6-7.pdf


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Portland Doorstep Review w/ Shona/Monica/Tim  eb3259

Date:		12/7/2000
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Brad, further to our conversation of yesterday morning, please find attached
Enron's payout table and alternative payout table regarding the permanent
assignment of PGT capacity.

The onus will be on Enron to deliver long dated capacity to Calpine and we
will begin working on this immediately.

Below is a summary of some of the key next steps. Please review and we can
discuss on Monday the numbers and final steps as required.

ENA and Calpine will formalise  % discount, volume grid, lump sum $ amount or
annuity amount.
As discussed our cost of funds implied will be LIBOR + 200 basis points. ( to
be confirmed ).
ENA will raise a precedent agreement with option language in favor of Calpine
which allows you to request that the period 2 volume  be no less than the
period 1 volume and up to the total delivered volume of 67,500 based on the
agreed to % discount as referenced in point #1.
ENA will forward the draft precedent agreement which will include the
necessary conditions precedent required and with the general commercial terms
as agreed per items above (ETA - Tues/Wed).
ENA will provide a bid to Calpine on Monday afternoon with a number on the
Spark Spread proposal.
Contact name @ Trans Canada and ANG is Kay Coad Ph: 403-267-2480.

I trust the information as provided above is consistent with our previous
discussions.  Please contact me once you have had a chance to review.

Regards,

BT


Have a good day

Cara Semperger
503/464-3814


Curtain

Recycle bin


Start Date: 3/30/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001033020.txt


Attached for you reference are updated lists of the Brokerage Agreements
for  Futures and Equity.

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490


I didn't know about this one.  I'm going to follow up with Brent on this one
and I will get back to you in a day or so.  We'll save the Scott Mills
discussion for a later date!

On another note, I enjoyed lunch today.  Let me know when you want to get out
of the building again sometime.  --Sally

Louise Kitchen
06/05/2000 04:59 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Aghh!

Brent Price just stole Jennifer Denny - no discussion or anything.  So I
obviously will get Scott Mills in return!
Louise


Ernie,  How is it going?  Did you have a good weekend?  I actually had to
work for part of it, so my weekend wasn't all that great.

Were you able to book a room for me?  Wanted to be sure that was taken care
of.

	Ernie.J.Zavaleta@fritolay.com
	02/20/2001 03:50 PM

		 To: Mary Ramsey <maryramsey@tramex.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: HOTEL RESERVATIONS IN AUSTIN

Mary,

Can I book one more room at this rate on this reservation (same card number),
for a total of two rooms?  The second will be a non-smaking king size as well.

Thank you,
Ernie

281-775-1653

Mary Ramsey <maryramsey@tramex.com>
02/20/2001 02:55 PM

To:   Ernie J Zavaleta/Frito-Lay/US@Frito-Lay
cc:
Subject:  HOTEL RESERVATIONS IN AUSTIN

 SALES PERSON: 84                  ITINERARY                    DATE: 20 FEB
01
 CUSTOMER NBR: 1P0396                           XFIONO          PAGE: 01

        TO: FRITO LAY / PEPSI
            ERNIE ZAVALETA
            100 GLENBOROUGH DT
            SUITE 1200
            HOUSTON TX 77067

 FOR: ZAVALETA/ERNIE          REF: FRIT-0046000

 HOTEL
 03MAR   AUSTIN            MARRIOTT HOTELS
  SAT                      MARRIOTT AUSTIN CAPITAL
                           701 EAST 11TH STREET
                           AUSTIN TX 78701
                           FONE 512-478-1111
                           FAX  512-478-3700
                           1 NIGHT       1 ROOM       OUT-04MAR
                           LEISURE RATE
                           RATE-129.00USD PER NIGHT
                           CANCEL BY 06P DAY OF ARRIVAL
                           GUARANTEED LATE ARRIVAL
                           CONFIRMATION 82747164
                           RQST KING BED NON SMOKING

 OTHER
 03JUN   AUSTIN
  SUN                      THA NK YOU FOR CALLING TRAMEX TRAVEL-MARY

 .
 ---------------------  IMPORTANT ----------------------
   AIRLINE SECURITY REQUEST A 60 MINUTES FOR CHECK-IN.
   GOVERNMENT ISSUED PHOTO ID IS REQUIRED BY AIRLINE.
 -------------------------------------------------------
 ----------------- ITINERARY COMMENTS ------------------
 AIRFARES ARE PER PERSON AND SUBJ. TO CHANGE UNTIL TKT/D
    PLEASE REVIEW ITINERARY IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT
 IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, CONTACT THE LEISURE TRAVEL
 DEPARTMENT BY EMAIL OR PHONE --
 972-334-5055 OR 800-776-8009, MON-FRI 8A-5P CST, OR
 CONTACT YOUR AIRLINE DIRECT FOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE.
 -------------------------------------------------------

Mary Ramsey, CTA
Tramex Travel Leisure Department
972-334-5421 800-776-8009
maryramsey@tramex.com


Peggy, and all,

I did a first cut on a draft of regulatory/legislative risks associated with
San Diego.  Because of the need for quick turn-around I am circulating the
draft for comment.

If anyone has comments on the draft, please send to my attention asap and I
will compile a final document.  Thanks.

Peggy Mahoney
09/05/2000 01:53 PM
To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Peters/HOU/EES@EES, James M
Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Nikkel/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Regulatory Risks

Mona:
As we discusssed, I've attached the PR risks associated with going
back into San Diego.  Please email back your take on the regulatory
risks in the morning.
Thanks
Peggy


Marcela,

I emailed you a couple of days ago asking for the Tail # for the plane the
Whalley's will be returning on Sunday.  Could you please furnish me with this
information.

Many Thanks,

Liz

"MARCELA WHITE" <JETCHART@TAVAERO.COM> on 10/09/2000 04:16:33 PM
To: <Greg.Whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Liz

We got it, thank you.  Everything is set.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Greg.Whalley@enron.com>
To: <JETCHART@TAVAERO.COM>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: Liz

>
> Marcela,
>
> I faxed it this morning.  Have you still not received?
>
> Liz
>
>
>
>
> "MARCELA WHITE" <JETCHART@TAVAERO.COM> on 10/09/2000 11:03:10 AM
>
> To:   <Greg.Whalley@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Liz
>
>
>
> Liz:
> Did you get my credit card form? As soon as you get a  chance could you
> complete it and return to me via fax. Thank you. I  need this prior to
> the trip departing this week. Thank you,  Marcela
>
>
>
>


Okay fellow deputies, where are your prizes?

I can only assume that the prizes you've collected are so great you can't
bear to part with them because to date I have only received two balloon
prizes from you.  I know there are more out there so please send them to my
attention at CXY Energy Marketing, 2400, 205 - 5th Avenue S.W., Bow Valley
Square 2, Calgary AB T2P 2V7.

In order for the prize donors to be recognized in the brochure to be handed
out at the party I need to know who is donating what by no later than Friday
January 21st in order to meet our publishing deadline.  I will collect
prizes up until Wednesday January 26th but any entries after the 21st may
not be recognized in the brochure.

The balloon sale is a very easy way for us to raise $3000.  Our goal is to
have prizes in one third of the balloons which requires each deputy to
collect at least two prizes.  It's as easy as asking your favorite
restaurant, hairdresser, massage therapist or wine store to donate a gift
certificate.

If you have any questions or need more suggestions feel free to give me a
call at 260-3441.

Thanks very much,

Maggie

Maggie Timmins
CXY Energy Marketing
Phone: (403) 260-3441
Fax:    (403) 237-8266
maggie_timmins@cdnoxy.com

 - att1.htm


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 08:26 AM -----

	Mark Evans
	05/12/2000 03:44 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Margaux

Carol,

I need to fill you in on the new structure. Essentially the senior debt will
now be Corp guaranteed and on balance sheet. The swap adjustments will
therefore impact equity only.

We are now projecting financial close as the week of June 19th - the week I
go on holiday!. That means preliminary offering memo for the guaranteed notes
going out around the last week of May. By then, everything has to be
finalised (including the swap).

Hope this helps your planning.

All is well and will be better when Margaux closes.

All the best with being a mum again!

     Mark

   Carol St Clair                10/05/2000 15:28

To: Mark Evans/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Margaux

Mark:
Can you give me a sense of when you think Margaux will close?  The only
reason I'm asking is because I will be taking maternity leave at some point
in time in the next 2-21/2 months and I want to make sure that if necessary,
I get someone else involved.  Hope all is going well.
Carol


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 05:09 PM
---------------------------
From: Fred Philipson/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 04:46 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/ENRON@enronXgate, Rahil
Jafry/ENRON@enronXgate, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft  - Offsite in April 4-9.ppt

Here,s the latest.  Recent efforts have focused on clarifying the &who, what,
how, when, why and where,s8 of the project.  Please direct your feedback to
me.

Thanks,

Fred
5-9323