Mary, although this presentation is for the Legal Dept. I thought maybe if
you have a representative from your group there it might be helpful.  Do you
have someone, like Mary Gosnell, that you would like to attend?  Let me know,
and I'll get their name added to the list.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/20/99 11:55 AM
---------------------------

Sylvia Hu@ENRON
09/20/99 11:49 AM
To: Clement Abrams/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jim Armogida/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Nutt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carol
Essig/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Berg/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Butcher/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sharon Morgan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark
Holsworth/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Betty J
Coneway/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenton Erwin/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony
Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Jordan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb
Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda L Lawrence/HOU/EES@EES, Dan -ECT Legal-
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Pedigo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Pharms/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yaron
Shaham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
- ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann
Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kalim Tippitt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Harkness/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger
Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES,
Karen A Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick G Grant/HOU/EES@EES, James E
Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Maynard/HOU/EES@EES, Mark W Miller/HOU/EES@EES,
Tony Pryor/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Kim Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Robbi Rossi/HOU/EES@EES, Lori
Pinder/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Finelli/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Andrew Wu/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Rapp/HOU/EES@EES, Danny
Clark/HOU/EES@EES, David K Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julia H
Chin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George
Frumkin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Johan
Gerrese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lauren
Hagerty/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle
Hicks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kelly Noel
Higgason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Laurie
Lee/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sean
Long/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicky
Martinez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greer
Mendelow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Neil D Meyer/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX,
Jan Moore/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Nancy
Muchmore/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bonnie
Nelson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diana
Parker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edson
Pavao/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martin W
Penkwitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tanya
Sanford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Hong
Shen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paulette
Obrecht/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth Lay/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX,
Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Viverito/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Barbara
Hankins/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Kathleen
Carnahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lewis Chandler
Jr/EOG/Enron@Enron, Vickie Graham/EOG/Enron@Enron, Barry
Hunsaker/EOG/Enron@Enron, David Kocian/EOG/Enron@Enron, Tina
Meyer/EOG/Enron@Enron, Jeff Spencer/EOG/Enron@Enron, Jennie
Szeto/EOG/Enron@Enron, E J Vandermark/EOG/Enron@Enron, Steve
Williams/EOG/Enron@Enron, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Janet
Butler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@Enron, Candace
Kyle/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Laura Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@Enron, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bret
Reich/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Staci
Holtzman/FGT/Enron@Enron, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Philip Crowley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Louis
Soldano/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Charles
Cheek/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rita Bahner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tracy
Carter/Corp/Enron@Enron, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Grant/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eileen Kisluk/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brenda
McAfee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Robichaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert
Vote/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeannette Weiss/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bonnie
White/Corp/Enron@Enron, Becky Stephens/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathy
Siess/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Trey
Cash/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Norma Tidrow/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Barbara
Hankins/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Monique Shankle/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Sharon
Fields/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX
cc:
Subject: Lexis Luncheon - Wed. 9/22 11:30 - 1:00 EB46C1

REMINDER

ENRON CORP
CORPORATE & LAW INFORMATION SERVICES

Lexis-Nexis Luncheon
       (provided by Lexis)

You are cordially invited to a Lexis-Nexis Luncheon to see a demo on the new
Lexis.com/Research Advisor and searching public records for due diligence.

Time:  Wednesday, 9/22
                11:30 AM to 1:00 PM

Place:  Enron Conference Room 46C1

Who:        Enron Legal Groups

R.S.V.P.  C.O.B. of Tuesday, 9/21

Reserve:         Call or Email Sylvia Hu (x36775)


I JUST WANTED TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THAT TODAY (11-10-00) IS MY LAST DAY.  I
JUST FEEL LIKE IT IS TIME FOR SOMETHING NEW.   I HOPE YOU ALL HAVE GREAT
HOLIDAY AND GOOD LUCK IN YOUR LIVES.  DON'T FORGET ME!!!!

SINCERELY
NIKKI JOHNSON


Correction...the meeting will take place on Tuesday at 10:00 am.  It will be held in the same conference room.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Amanda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 2:54 PM
To:	Taylor, Craig; Brawner, Sandra F.; Neal, Scott; Ring, Andrea; Vickers, Frank; Mckay, Jonathan; Ames, Chuck; Townsend, Judy; Kaiser, Jared; Garcia, Clarissa; Lamadrid, Victor; Superty, Robert; Allwein, Robert; Goodell, Scott; Ordway, Chris; Homco, Meredith
Subject:	Business Planning Meeting

Please plan to attend a meeting on Monday, February 4th at 10:30 a.m.  The meeting will take place in conference room ECS06990.

Thank you,

Amanda Rybarski
Office: (713) 853-4384
Fax: (713) 646-3564
Cell: (713) 560-0934


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000 07:05
AM ---------------------------

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/10/2000 06:39:45 AM
To: " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>
cc: " - *Dick.Jenkins@enron.com" <Dick.Jenkins@enron.com>, " -
*Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>, " -
*Scott.Hendrickson@enron.com" <Scott.Hendrickson@enron.com>, " -
*Robin.Barbe@enron.com" <Robin.Barbe@enron.com>, " - *Kinney, Doug"
<dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>, NOTES -BPERRON *
<bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *mflewel@columbiaenergygroup.com"
<mflewel@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Re: TCO Capacity Due 3/15

Thanks. We have been watching Navigator and saw these too. I am talking with
John Hodge also and may be back with you.


Mark

I am not aware of any contracts similar to those described by Sharon.


The Southeast RTO orders are out and have followed through with what we expected from the discussion at the FERC meeting.

The SPP and Entergy RTO proposals have been rejected because they fail to satisfy the scope and configuration requirements of Order No. 2000.  The Commission  notes that the required discussions between SPP and Entergy and its neighboring RTO/TOs has led to no increase in the original scope and configuration.  The filings by SPP and Entergy were brief, indicating only a lack of interest by other RTOs or utilities in joining to enlarge scope; they failed to specify any details of the talks, what changes could be made or what could be fixed to accomodate combination with other RTOs.  The order states that the Commission favors the development of large, regional transmission organizations reflecting natural markets.  The Commission indicates that they favor four RTOs - NE, SE, MW and West.  Therefore the order requires the participants in SPP and Entergy to participate in settlement discussions as set out in the mediation order.  Note that these meetings will start next Tuesday, July 17 before a FERC ALJ.

The Southern Company RTO is also found by the FERC to fail the scope characteristics of Order No. 2000.  The order finds that Southern's approach to focus on MOUs and seams issues with its neighbors is inadequate.  The order states, "We reiterate: the Commission's goal is to have a single RTO in the Southeast, and to have that single RTO operational as soon as possible."  The Commission recognizes that start-up costs in forming a larger RTO may be more, but that over the longer term, large RTOs will foster market development, will provide increased reliability and will result in lower wholesale electricity prices.  The order therefore directs the parties to the mediation as stated above.

The Grid South participants are also directed to the mediation which is starting on next Tuesday.  It is a lengthier order with more details on other aspects of RTOs, including Independent Board requirement, congestion managment, interconnection procedures, planning process and CBM.  Therefore, I am attaching a summary of the order.  One of the important findings of the order is that GridSouth is not sufficiently independent; the Applicant TOs are making policy decisions that should be made by an independent board.  Therefore, the order requires GridSouth to install an independent board and file a compliance filing within 90 days.

If anyone wants copies of the orders, let me know.


Concur with Harry, i.e., continue to take the position that the program
should be available to all.  When I was in Sacramento last week at a meeting
of all the players, the utilities argument against including DA customers was
based on "double dipping," i.e., payments to customers/ESPs for curtailment,
plus payments to customers/ESPs for the re-sale of power to the ISO resulting
from the curtailment.

The utilities "double dipping" argument is off base.  As important, the state
is facing the threat of frequent and severe supply disruptions this summer
and it needs to take each and every step necessary to try to avoid them.  The
utility position (apart from being incorrect) seems pretty short-sighted
given the dire circumstances.  So seems clear that California should include
both DA and bundled customers in the program.

Best,
Jeff

	Harry Kingerski
	03/06/2001 09:02 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Fred L Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Dave
Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Weiss/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: AB31X - Response Needed

Mike Day left me a message saying in discussions yesterday on AB 31X
(Wright's load curtailment bill), the utilities were making the point that
31x should only address bundled customers since the utilities were making the
incentive payments out of funds that would otherwise go to pay DWR  (in
effect, the curtailments are reducing the utility net short position).  They
were ok with having ESPs aggregate the loads of bundled customers (which will
be a very significant win, if we get it).   They think DA customers can get
curtailment benefits through existing (and new) ISO programs.

The dilemmas are:
the ISO programs may or may not be finalized for this summer and may or may
not give incentives that are as beneficial as AB31X
the utility plan discriminates against DA
preferably, the ISO would administer the programs described by AB31X for all
customers but that puts the ISO in the position of having to get approvals
from FERC for a CA-legislated program (they will have to do this anyway)
(nearly) all of our customers will be bundled this summer anyway, so there's
no immediate loss from going with the utility's position

We owe Mike an answer today.  Any thoughts?  My suggestion at this point is
to stick with the high road and argue for non-discriminatory treatment with
equal incentives paid to bundled and DA customers.

Background:  AB31X would give $500/mwh incentives for day ahead curtailment,
$750/mwh incentives for day-of curtailments, and incentives to be determined
for scheduled load reductions.  The ISO would invoke the programs based on
system conditions.

The ISO so far has put in place the equivalent of a scheduled load reduction
program, with specific payments, but has not finalized any day ahead or day
of programs.


I agree with Rick.  I know Jose is tied up on current business, but his input
will be important.  To date we have been relying on legal analysis of
required approvals etc.  That information is essential but it is, as you
know, about 10% of the issue.  The far more critical considerations are how
is the government likely to react on a political level and what can we do
about it.  I think our government affairs people are in the best position to
make these assessments.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 04/20/2000 11:43
AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
04/20/2000 11:07 AM
To: Diomedes Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Project California

I have reviewed the most recent IM and don't have any significant comments,
but my review did highlight the need to have a set or sets of
eyes(internally) who understand the regulatory overlay of the Southern Cone
better and who are also in a better position  ( physically and with language
skills ) to assess the  nature of the regulatory approvals needed and to
effectively pull on a set of local resources when this project begins to take
shape- With all of that in mind, I would recommend we , at the very least,
bring Jose into the loop. I intend to stay actively engaged and do whatever I
can, but we need help immediately on the regulatory front - the last thing I
would want to have happen to the project would be have it held hostage at the
governmental approval stage-  being proactive now by bringing Jose over the
wall would be my strong recommendation.Please advise.


Here is the form of option agreement Kathleen sent me yesterday.  Greg Krause
has a meeting with a landowner tomorrow and he wants to be able to provide
our pro forma form for the landowner's consideration.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2001
04:09 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan @ ENRON                           05/18/2001 03:27 PM

To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Form of Option Agreement

Ann Elizabeth,

Lisa Bills has requested some additional changes to the "form" of Option
Agreement I sent you yesterday.  If you will e-mail the form of Option
Agreement for the new Florida Option to Kay Mann, she will make the necessary
changes.  Also Ben Jacoby has indicated that  wants to see all new Option
Agreements prior to them being sent out to anyone so he can be in the loop.

Sorry you missed our meeting.

Kathleen

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 05/18/2001
03:06 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           05/17/2001 02:42 PM

To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Form of Option Agreement

Ann Elizabeth,

This may not be the absolute latest Form of Option, but it should be pretty
darn close to being totally blessed (by Herman Manis).  I am also attaching a
form of Memorandum of Option just in case you need it.

Kathleen


You Bet.  I may have you a helmet too.


I spoke to Kinneman today. Please call me to discuss when you get a chance.

Alan


The organizational documents of Garden State Paper and Compagnie Papiers Stadacona require quarterly reports of financial performance and legal issues to be provided to the Boards of Directors.  The Q3 2001 reports are attached.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Brad A. Kirchhofer


You can use my office but I may not be here.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, John
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:36 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Saunders, James
Subject:	Gruber Meeting on 2002 Plan still on

We are still on with Greg on Thursday, Nov. 29th, 8:00-10:00 am but since Greg will now be downtown he has agreed to meet in Rod's office.

Do you guys want to meet ahead of the meeting to review or discuss the package?


you know, i'd have to be in a store and have the opportunity to look at a
bunch of styles in order to choose a pair.

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	09/28/2000 03:50 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, Nancy Sellers
<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
		 cc: cameron@perfect.com, Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com, PSellers@pacbell.net,
PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu, scottwl@hotmail.com
		 Subject: RE: what kind of glasses do you think would look good on Dad?

you guys are being way too helpful
-----Original Message-----
From:   Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:   Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:25 PM
To:     Nancy Sellers
Cc:     cameron@perfect.com; Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com; PSellers@pacbell.net;
PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu; scottwl@hotmail.com
Subject:        Re: what kind of glasses do you think would look good on Dad?

Champagne.

P.S.  Though it feels like it at times, he's not my Dad.

                    Nancy
Sellers

                    <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:     Cameron
<cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff Dasovich
                    ndavi.com>                     <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>,
"Prentice @ Berkeley"

<PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers <PSellers@pacbell.net>,
                    09/28/2000 03:01 PM            Scott Laughlin
<scottwl@hotmail.com>

cc:
                                                   Subject:     what kind of
glasses do you think would look good on Dad?

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


To Members of the ISDA Board and ISDA Policy Staff:

ISDA has received the attached reply from the Chinese SAFE regarding our
GITIC-related inquiries.  Our initial reaction to this letter is that it
contains at least some good news in that SAFE has stated that it is not
necessary to obtain transaction-specific for derivatives transactions with
Chinese counterparties that are conducted "for hedging purposes."

We will ask Allen & Overy Hong Kong to prepare a brief memo on the
implications of this letter for the GITIC case and for more general dealings
with Chinese counterparties.  This memo, together with our original letter
to SAFE and the attached SAFE reply, will be circulated to all ISDA members
as quickly as possible.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Chin.Chong.Liew@AllenOvery.com
[mailto:Chin.Chong.Liew@AllenOvery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 4:00 PM
To: Brian.yiu@hk.standardchartered.com; Dennis.Wan@chase.com;
eric@tmihk.com; gillis@sifl.com.hk; nakada@sifl.com.hk;
kenneth.j.blomster@hk.arthurandersen.com;
Laura.schramm@hk.pwcglobal.com; lyftan@lehman.com;
Chin.Chong.Liew@AllenOvery.com; Magnus.spencer@csfb.com;
Michael.J.Suppan@bankofamerica.com; Kiyota@fcmc.com; Philip.tsao@gs.com;
quentin_hills@hk.ml.com; Richard.jackson@jfleming.com;
Stephane.cuny@socgen.com; Voons@ms.com; Tricia.bowden@gs.com;
Zhangkun@mailcity.com; rgrove@isda.org; rpickel@isda.org;
RAinslie@isda.org
Cc: azam.mistry@hsbc.com; apapesch@isda.org
Subject: Reply from SAFE

I attach for your information the reply which Azam received from SAFE today
(together with an English translation) in response to ISDA's letter of 10th
August, 2000 .

The good news is that SAFE agreed that PRC financial institutions
conducting derivative transactions for hedging purposes in the
international financial market should comply with the applicable PRC law
and that it would not be necessary for them to obtain a transaction
specific approval from SAFE.

Kind regards,
Chong

(See attached file: safe.PDF)(See attached file: safetranslation.PDF)

======================================================================

This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning the
Technology Services Helpdesk on +852 2974 7111.  You should not copy this
e-mail or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other
person.

Allen & Overy
9th Floor
Three Exchange Square
Central
Hong Kong

Tel: +852 2974 7000
Fax: +852 2974 6999

http://www.allenovery.com

A list of the firm's principals will be provided on request
Authorised by Chris Roberts

======================================================================

======================================================================

This email is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20) 7330
3000 and requesting the Technology Services Helpdesk. You should not copy it
or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.

Allen & Overy
One New Change
London
EC4M 9QQ

Tel:+44 (20) 7330 3000
Fax: +44 (20) 7330 9999
General Email: Helpdesk@allenovery.com
www: http://www.allenovery.com

Allen & Overy is a solicitors' partnership.  A list of the names of partners
and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the above
office.  The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign lawyers.

======================================================================

 - safe.PDF
 - safetranslation.PDF


[IMAGE]
There are hundreds of cards out there. How on earth are you supposed to know which to choose?  FreeCardSearch, that's how.   You enter your information and the FreeCardSearch Insant Credit Card Matching Search Engine tells you which Major Bank Credit Cards YOU Pre-Qualify for.  Then the choice is YOURS!  It's absolutely FREE with NO  obligation!  You're guaranteed to find matches!  Don't waste your time anywhere else.

[IMAGE] Click here if you no longer want to receive gifts and special offers from Send 4 Fun.


I don't remember this one.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/01/2000 11:18
AM ---------------------------

Rusty Stevens
10/31/2000 11:26 AM
To: karen.way@piperrudnick.com, mark.gershon@piperrudnick.com, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Schaffer Land Option - Pontiac Site

I wanted to send out a reminder to everyone that I had indicated to Mr.
Schaeffer that we would be sending him a document last week and to suggest
that we try to get something out to him this week if at all possible.

Since our critical final zoning vote is next Thursday, I want to make sure we
don't give him any reason to get "up in arms" over this issue and start
thinking we have just been leading him along without intending to follow
through on the deal.  Mark and Karen have done such an exemplary job on the
zoning (record time) that I don't want anything to get in our way at the
final moment.  Mr. Schaeffer is one of the wealthier and more influential
farmers in the area, and has thus far been pretty quiet at the meetings,
however, he pointedly cornered me at the end of our last meeting to ask about
this issue.  Lets keep him happy.

Please let me know if we can get it out this week, so I can call him and
apologize for the delay and give him a new improved delivery date of the
draft documents.

Thanks.


[INFO] -- Content Manager:
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message
is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer
to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

Thanks for having these signed  and sending back copies by courier, as well
as signature pages by  fax.
?
Speak with you on  Monday.
?

Jacqueline  Didier
Legal and Compliance  Department
CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON
Phone: 212-325-4129
Fax: 212-325-8282

 - 003680684.DOC
 - Didier, Jacqueline.vcf


Understanding and Applying Financial  Mathematics Venue Change- London,
September 21 & 22:
Please note that I am faxing you a form which  states a venue change for the
above listed course. Just to reconfirm, the  training course will now be held
at the following location:?
The White Hall  Hotel
2-5 Montague Street?
London
WC1B 5BU?
T 011 44 207 580 2224?
F 011 44 207 580 5554
Please contact venue search to arrange your accommodations-  011 44 208 541
5656
?
To confirm your acknowledgement of this venue change, please  either fax back
the form or respond to this email. Please contact me with any  questions you
have regarding the change.
?
Regards,
Amy Lamonsoff?
Conference Coordinator?
T(212)925-1864x148
F(212)925-7585?
alamonsoff@watersinfo.com
?
?


November 20, 2000

Algonquin, East Tennessee and Texas Eastern will observe Thursday,
November 22 and Friday, November 23, 2001 as company holidays. Capacity
Services will be staffed with shift personnel.  The Capacity Services
after hours is (713) 627-5058.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042324.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  28.48)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1


========================================================
From KHOU-TV's Dr. Neil Frank & Reliant Energy W.A.R.N. :
========================================================
WTNT34 KNHC 290829

TCPAT4

BULLETIN

TROPICAL DEPRESSION FOURTEEN ADVISORY NUMBER   8

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL

4 AM EST MON OCT 29 2001

AT 4 AM EST...0900Z...THE CENTER OF TROPICAL DEPRESSION FOURTEEN WAS

LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 27.7 NORTH...  LONGITUDE 42.3 WEST OR ABOUT

1090 MILES...1750 KM...SOUTHWEST OF LAJES IN THE AZORES ISLANDS.

THE DEPRESSION IS MOVING TOWARD THE WEST NORTHWEST NEAR  9 MPH

..15 KM/HR...AND THIS MOTION IS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE FOR THE NEXT

24 HOURS.

MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE NEAR  35 MPH... 55 KM/HR...WITH HIGHER

GUSTS.  SOME STRENGTHENING IS FORECAST DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS.

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS 1009 MB...29.80 INCHES.

REPEATING THE 4 AM EST POSITION...27.7 N... 42.3 W.  MOVEMENT

TOWARD...WEST NORTHWEST NEAR  9 MPH.  MAXIMUM SUSTAINED

WINDS... 35 MPH.  MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...1009 MB.

THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER AT

10 AM EST.

FORECASTER JARVINEN

WWWW
========================================================
This message is brought to you by KHOU-TV 11/Reliant Energy W.A.R.N.
For instant weather on the web or to learn more about our Wide Area Radar
Net (W.A.R.N) visit our website at:  http://www.khou.com
=======================================================

Need to change you weather bulletin settings, going on vacation, or
wish to unsubscribe? Click the link below to do so.

http://khou.weatherwarn.net/wxwarn/index.asp?stn=KHOU

TROUBLE UNSUBSCRIBING OR SUBSCRIBING?
FOLLOW THIS LINK FOR HELP! :
http://khou.com/newwxwarn/troubleshooting.htm

WeatherWarn 2000
========================================================


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2001 12:43 PM ---------------------------
From:	Matt Motsinger/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 08:44 AM
To:	Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/ENRON@enronXgate, David Forster/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Torrey Moorer/ENRON@enronXgate, Matt Motsinger/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Savita Puthigai/ENRON@enronXgate, Jennifer Rosado/ENRON@enronXgate, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Tara Sweitzer/ENRON@enronXgate, Andy Zipper/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:	EOL Average Deal Count by Trader and Product as of 5-8-01

The following file contains a graphical view of the North American Gas average deal count by Trader and Product for EOL. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not update links when opening this file.

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please let me know .

Matt Motsinger
EnronOnline
713-853-5221


FYI, I will respond.  This is the omnibus master that outside counsel
modified for us, we will have to modifiy it for EOL as well.

----- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 02:31 PM -----

	Andrea Calo
	02/06/2001 02:03 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Financial GTC

Brent,

As I anticipated, Lavarato seems to want to get started with financial
transactions in Argentina as soon as possible.  The boys told me that once
they have the document they would take it on some sort of road show in order
to get input from the market prior to putting it on line.  In order to do so,
they have requested certain "flexibility" regarding the terms of the
agreement that the prospective CP's may want to have changed.  They
understood and agreed that the concept behind the contracts on EOL is that
they are standardized and are not intended to be modified upon CP's request
once they are on line.

Also, we need to confirm that this document can be used both online and
"offline".   Did you get a chance to take a look at the changes?

Regards,

Andrea


Hi Bob,

Does this have anything to do with the Wisconsin site you mentioned in the
staff meeting?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/07/2000 02:16
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
09/06/2000 12:08 PM
To: Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gregg
Penman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: WEPCO term sheet - Plano

Attached is the draft term sheet for the WEPCO term sheet on the Plano site.
I have used the 9/01 clean version of the ComEd Plano term sheet as the
template for this document.

I have made some changes to reflect our discussions with WEPCO including the
following:

 1. Term (3 and 5 year)
 2. Contract Base Capacity Charge ($ amount may be subject to further change)
 3. Scheduling (day-ahead only)
 4. Project Updates (term modification dates changed to reflect 3 or 5 year
term)
 5. Commercial Operation Date Guarantee (dates change to reflect '02 start
date/termination right triggered off of 6/1/01 notice by Seller)
 6. Delay/Early Completion Penalties/Bonus (changed to reflect different
Capacity Charge)
 7. Availability LD's (changed to reflect different Capacity Charge)

Please review and send me your comments.  I am planning to send this document
to WEPCO tomorrow afternoon.

Thanks,
Fred


Ari Weisbard
314 Acadia Drive
Madison, WI 53717
aweisbar@fas.harvard.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Ari Weisbard


Dear Fool,

Wouldn't it be great to have a time machine? If you had traveled
back to 1991 and invested a cool $10,000 in Cisco, you'd have
made more than $1 million by now. Or if you'd journeyed back to
1987 and bought a little Microsoft, well, you'd probably own a
large tropical island today.

Our lawyers aren't too hip on the whole time machine idea, so
we're offering you the next best thing(

INTRODUCING THE MOTLEY FOOL SELECT!
Simply put, The Motley Fool Select is all about putting our best
investment ideas in front of you each and every month. With all
the financial information out there, The Motley Fool Select
helps you weed through the clutter and stay ahead of the game.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=394051

EACH MONTHLY ISSUE WILL HIGHLIGHT:

-- An emerging leader in an exciting industry (a Rule Breaker
stock)
-- A proven market leader with continued growth potential (a
Rule Maker stock)
-- A small- or mid-cap stock with the potential to make it big
(a Foolish 8 stock)
-- A different investing theme each month, such as stock
spotlights, coverage of emerging industries, or the debunking of
over-hyped "pretenders"

And at the charter subscription SPECIAL OFFER OF ONLY $49 a
year, you'll be the first to learn about some of our newest
investment ideas.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=394052

Stop wasting your time and money looking aimlessly for new
investment ideas. Sign up to receive The Motley Fool Select
today! Trust us, it's much safer than a time machine.

Fool on!
Your friends at The Motley Fool

P.S. The premiere issue of The Motley Fool Select will launch in
late April 2001. Subscribe by April 25 to take advantage of this
special $49 offer!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=394053

P.P.S. Want to see more? Between now and April 26th you can take
a sneak peek at a preview edition of The Motley Fool Select!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=394054
_____________________________________________________

Special Offer From The Motley Fool

You may change or cancel your subscription at any time.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=alewis@ect.enro
n.com
_____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2001, The Motley Fool.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=394055

MsgId:
msg-11309-2001-04-18_15-47-13-5683341_0_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-15:54:22(4-18
-2001)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: alewis@ect.enron.com


Vince, Zimin,
I participated in a telephone conference on this company this morning.  There
was a possibility Enron would invest in it.

Their product appears to be a GUI interface over the top of ILOG Solver (and
possibly ILOG CPLEX) which allows problems to be expressed in high level
terms.  I do not see any immediate application at Enron, but I am interested
in the concepts used so expressed an interest in a demo.  Maybe it would be
useful for general modelling projects here.

They do not even have a user manual for their software, so it will be
difficult to figure out what it does unless a demo is arranged.  The
possibility for growth in the company seems small as the ILOG software is a
modest size market and their product is aimed at only a small part of that
market.  I think the scheduling tools in SAP, i2, etc are more likely to
succeed than this one as they are already integrated into an information
system.

Because of the small market for this software, the many competitors, the
absence of any clear use for it at Enron and the early stage of development,
there is very little prospect of us funding this company.

Tom


Well, she declined our kind offer, didn't she?  As busy as life is between
work and home for me right now, I can't say that it will bother me too much
to attend a shower where someone else makes the finger sandwiched and punch!
Do be on the look out for the perfect pack of diaper pins.  I noticed some at
a rack at Randall's the other day... (Just kidding!)

Hope you all are doing fine.  I was on jury duty three days last week -
really interesting, but totally screwed up my schedule at work.  I have been
doing double-time to try to catch up, especially since I plan to be off the
week of December 18th.


Any interest in going to the Rockets game tonight.  I have free tickets and it may be Hakeem's last game.  Let me know.

Sue


Sam,

Good thinking. I shall also write an article over the weekend so we shall
have one in reserve.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           11/15/2000 07:17 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: the next newsletter

Good Morning, Vince!

As I will be on vacation (tomorrow until Monday the 27th), I'm enlisting
Elena Chilkina's help in producing this Monday's (20 Nov.) newsletter.
Here's how I hope it will work:

I've asked Alex Huang to try to get his article to you by Friday for your
review.
I'm attempting to get with Sharad today to get his photo and remind him about
the bio piece for page one.  He should be the feature for Monday.
I will also schedule a person and an article (probably from Charlie Weldon)
for the 27th.  If Alex's article is a two-parter, we'll just do part 2 that
day instead.
For all submissions for this coming Monday's issue, I would ask that they be
e-mailed to Elena Chilkina

If you notice something I may have missed,  would you please let me know?

Thank You!

Sam


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
12:50 PM ---------------------------

Leslie Smith
10/13/2000 10:59 AM
To: Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angela
Gill/NA/Enron@Enron, Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Derick Jones/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sandra R McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eve
Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Salcido/Corp/Enron@Enron, Judy Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: RUBY

---------------------- Forwarded by Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000 10:57
AM ---------------------------

Lisa Shoemake
10/13/2000 09:16 AM
To: Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, George D Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: RUBY

---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000 09:19
AM ---------------------------

Cheryl Slone
10/12/2000 08:37 AM
To: emoses@mdanderson.org, rflores@traveltech.com, Stephanie Cole/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Copier
Repair/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: RUBY

 - ruby.pps


I agree. Given that Andy's world is expanding (corp dev) he may be even less accessible. I'll discuss with Andy and Ben. Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietrich, Janet
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Buy, Rick
Cc:	Delainey, David
Subject:	Harrah's DASH

Just to be sure you're in the loop here, no one in Finance was available to sign this DASH last week. Not Fastow, not Glisan, their Assistants weren't in. Deffner wasn't here. Lipshutz wasn't here. etc, etc, etc. I told Hatchen, Gorte to represent Corp. Finance and Gorte gave verbal OK. We still haven't been able to get Fastow and Glisan to sign the DASH (I think they're back tomorrow). Deal is done and executed.

This is too difficult for someone in our Deal Management group to facilitate through our system. Maybe we need to give back-up authority to RAC for approvals in a situation like this. This may be a topic for our offsite on Friday.


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042611.txt


I called my friend at FERC.  She said she is working on the report.  She said
Staff's biggest problem was all of the requests for confidentiality - that's
all she could say.  She asked me to E-mail the white paper directly to her,
so I will.


FYI.  Utility recent submissions to PUC regarding DASR process under 09.20.01 DA suspension.

Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett [mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:41 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)
Subject: FW: DIRECT ACCESS SUSPENSION LETTER

-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer.Tsao@sce.com [mailto:Jennifer.Tsao@sce.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:24 AM
To: pxo2@pge.com; PSzymanski@sempra.com; 'Dian M. Grueneich'; JBennett
Subject: DIRECT ACCESS SUSPENSION LETTER

Below is a copy of the letter that SCE sent to the Energy Division last
Thursday.

Peter/Paul -- Can you forward me a copy of what PG&E and SDG&E sent as
well?  Thanks.

Jennifer M. Tsao
Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison
G.O. 1, Room 345
phone:  626-302-6819
fax:  626-302-2050
----- Forwarded by Jennifer Tsao/SCE/EIX on 10/09/01 11:01 AM -----

                    Jeanne Smith

                                         To:     Jennifer Tsao/SCE/EIX@SCE

                    10/09/01             cc:

                    10:21 AM             Subject:     DIRECT ACCESS
SUSPENSION LETTER

 (Embedded
 image moved   (Embedded image moved to file: pic22208.pcx)
 to file:
 pic09399.pcx)  FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

(See attached file: 10-4-01 DA Suspension Ltr (E-mail).doc)

Jeanne Smith
Southern California Edison
San Francisco Office
(415) 929-5514 / PAX 2-6714
Fax: (415) 673-1116


If you are working in Livelink and you notice that it is not working properly
or not working at all, please let me or Mark know as soon as possible. We are
then responsible for alerting other users not in our group and also
contacting someone in IT.  If you happen to be the person that becomes aware
of this problem, please make a point to come and tell me or Mark at that
time.

Thank you!

Brenna


z/f trading 4


Return Receipt

 Your         ISDA Agreement between Credit Agricole Indosuez and Enron North
 document:     America Corp.

 was received James Coiley/WFW
 by:

 at:          09:20:33 Today


I spoke to Mark Taylor about your signing authority, and he agrees that you
do not have the authority to execute documents on your own, but as long as
you are only co-signing documents signed by an authorized officer as a
control measure we're OK.

	Sheri Thomas
	11/30/2000 10:27 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Energy Gateway Provider Agreement

The notice information looks fine.  I am a Director - don't know about
signing the docs though...
thanks
Sheri

From: Tana Jones on 11/30/2000 09:53 AM
To: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Energy Gateway Provider Agreement

Attached is the referenced agreement.  Let me know if the notice information
is OK with you.  If so, I'll get it signed by Craig Breslau today, then bring
it to you for countersignature.  Thinking about that, what's your title?  I'm
not sure you have the authority to sign documents w/o special authority...


calendar as fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000 10:47 AM -----

	James D Steffes
	12/18/2000 09:58 AM

		 To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Monthly Regulatory Meeting

Please add these dates / times to your calendar.  It will be critical to
attend.  We are trying to set up once a month meetings with East Power to go
over continued RTO efforts.

Please come prepared to discuss key issues in your RTO / region.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 12/18/2000 09:44 AM -----

	Tamara Jae Black@ECT
	12/15/2000 03:03 PM

		 To: Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug
Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Monthly Regulatory Meeting

Please mark you calendar for the Monthly Regulatory Meeting to review the RTO
Progress and Measures Scorecard.  The dates are as follows:

Jan. 4th  rm 30C2 3 - 4pm  Conf. number to call if out of the office rm 30c2
713/853-0302

Feb. 6th  rm 30c1  3 - 4pm  Conf. number to call if out of the office rm 30c1
713/646-8670

March 6th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

April 3rd rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

May 1st  rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

June 5th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

July 10th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Aug. 7th  rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Sept. 6th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Oct. 2nd rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Nov. 6th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Dec. 4th rm 30c1  3 -4 pm

Please forward all questions to Lloyd Will at x33383.

Thanks Tjae


This is the sponsor undertakings which we commonly refer to as the Central
Bank Indemnity.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 12/20/2000 09:51 AM
---------------------------

"RACITI, Melissa" <melissa.raciti@freshfields.com> on 11/08/2000 11:07:55 AM
To: acestero@velaw.com, "Adriana Mathias Baptista (E-mail)"
<amb@tfts.tozzini.com.br>, af@tozzini.com.br, alejandra.arze@citicorp.com,
ameyer@mmso.com.br, "Ana beatriz kesselring"
<ana.beatriz.kesselring@bakernet.com>, "Ana Silvia Dias"
<ana.silvia.dias@bakernet.com>, "Anabela de Oliveira"
<Anabela.DeOliveira@chadbourne.com>, anakarinasouza@mmso.com.br, "Analia
Miqueri (BFM&L) (E-mail)" <am@bfmyl.com.ar>, "Anamaria Rosenthal"
<anamaria.rosenthal@bakernet.com>, "Andrea Gavino (E-mail)"
<Andrea.Gavino@enron.com>, andrea.arze@citicorp.com, "Andreia Almeida"
<andreia.almeida@enron.com>, "Andrew Pierrie (E-mail)"
<ayp@dentonwildesapte.com>, "Barbara Boehm" <bboeh@opic.gov>,
barry.k.pettifor@uk.pwcglobal.com, bbilger@velaw.com, "Beatriz Mello"
<beatriz.mello@bakernet.com>, "Blanca Bollom" <blanca.bollom@enron.com>,
"Bradley Barta" <bradley.barta@stoneweb.com>, brian.gilbertson@stoneweb.com,
"BURKE, Ted (TDB)" <ted.burke@freshfields.com>, caio@mmso.com.br, "Carolina
Galvao" <carolinagalvao@tozzini.com.br>, "Chaim Wachsberger (E-mail)"
<chaim.wachsberger@chadbourne.com>, chris.m.j.dutton@si.shell.com, "Christian
Huizer (E-mail)" <Christiaan.Huizer@enron.com>, "Claudia Bonelli"
<ceb@tozzini.com.br>, claus-michael.koch@kfw.de, "Cliff Rankin"
<crankin@velaw.com>, cuiabaclosing@tozzini.com.br, dalaniz@velaw.com,
"Daniela Serpa" <daniela.serpa@citicorp.com>, "David Schumacher (E-mail)"
<david.schumacher@chadbourne.com>, "Deia Holzmann"
<deia.holzmann@citicorp.com>, "DELPINO, Fiorella"
<fiorella.delpino@freshfields.com>, "ELORZA, Juliana"
<juliana.elorza@freshfields.com>, "Fatima Carr" <fatima.a.carr@bakernet.com>,
"Fernando Aguirre (E-mail)" <faguirre@caoba.entelnet.bo>, "Fernando Rojas
(E-mail)" <fernando@rojas-lawfirm.com>, fferraz@mmso.com.br, "Frank Kluesener
(KfW) (E-mail)" <Frank.Kluesener@kfw.de>, g.g.garcia@enron.com, "gabriela
marques" <gabrielamarques@felsberg.com.br>, gordon.combs@stoneweb.com, "Gra?a
Pedretti" <gracapedretti@felsberg.com.br>, "haloliver@aol.com"
<holiver83@aol.com>, "Heloisa Andrade (E-mail)" <hsfa@tozzini.com.br>,
hercules.celescuekci@bakernet.com, hns@maples.candw.ky, "Ivan Bole (BFM&L)
(E-mail)" <ib@bfmyl.com.ar>, "Javier Errecondo (BFM&L) (E-mail)"
<je@bfmyl.com.ar>, jeff.moore@stoneweb.com, jenp@tozzini.com.br,
jlowenthal@mmso.com.br, "Joana Ryan" <joana.ryan@enron.com>, "Joao Francisco
Regos" <joaofrancisco.regos@bakernet.com>, "John Barquin"
<jbarquin@velaw.com>, "John Novak" <jnovak@enron.com>,
jorge.garoufalias@citicorp.com, "Jose Bestard" <jose.bestard@enron.com>,
"Jos, Roberto Martins" <j.roberto.martins@bakernet.com>, "Juan Carlos Moreno
(E-mail)" <jcmoreno@indacochea.com.bo>, "Karla Wurth (E-mail)"
<kwurth@indacochea.com.bo>, "Karl-Heinz Wellmann (KfW) (E-mail)"
<Karl-Heinz.Wellmann@kfw.de>, kevin.fitzpatrick@stoneweb.com, "Kruskaia
Sierra-Escalante (E-mail)" <kse@chadbourne.com>, "Laine Powell"
<Laine.A.Powell@enron.com>, loftsg@brazil.kben.com, "Louis Piscitelli"
<louis.piscitelli@citicorp.com>, "Maria del Carmen Ballivian (E-mail)"
<mariac@rojas-lawfirm.com>, "Mary Mervenne (E-mail)" <mmerv@opic.gov>,
mbeckworth@velaw.com, mike_g._Bignell@sedgwick.com, "Nancy Rivera (E-mail)"
<nrive@opic.gov>, "O'BRIEN, Lisa" <lisa.o'brien@freshfields.com>, "Pablo
Rojas (E-mail)" <pablo@rojas-lawfirm.com>, pandrade@freshfields.com, "Pedro
Seraphim" <pgs@tozzini.com.br>, qys@ceibo.entelnet.bo, "RACITI, Melissa"
<melissa.raciti@freshfields.com>, "Renata Araujo" <raraujo@velaw.com>,
"Ricardo Indacochea (E-mail)" <rindacochea@indacochea.com.bo>, "Ricardo
Nogueira" <ricardonogueira@felsberg.com.br>, "Ricardo Sanches"
<ricardosanches@felsberg.com.br>, richard.a.lammers@enron.com,
rndr@amcham.com.br, rnovais@mmso.com.br, "Rob Gay" <rob.g.gay@enron.com>,
"Robert Shapiro (E-mail)" <robert.shapiro@chadbourne.com>, "Roberto La Laina
(E-mail)" <rlalaina@tozzini.com.br>, "Rodd Werstil"
<Rodd.Werstil@chadbourne.com>, "Rodrigo Sales (E-mail)"
<Rodrigo.Sales@BakerNet.com>, russell.ridgway@stoneweb.com,
ruth.a.crawford@si.shell.com, sbaratta@sewkis.com, scraw@opic.gov, "SHAKOOR,
Fiona"
<IMCEAEX-_O=FRESHFIELDS_OU=USA-NEW+20YORK_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=FSHAKOOR@freshfield
s.com>, starry@velaw.com, "Stefan Unna (C&P) (E-mail)"
<stefan.unna@chadbourne.com>, "Stephen Coats" <scoats@velaw.com>,
stephen.gray@enron.com, "Steve Muller" <smiller@velaw.com>,
susan.garven@stoneweb.com, susanna.stern@citicorp.com,
terri.powers@stoneweb.com, "Thomas Felsberg"
<thomasfelsberg@felsberg.com.br>, "Thomas Mahaffey (E-mail)"
<tmaha@opic.gov>, turton@brazil.kben.com
cc:

Subject: Central Bank Agreement

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.
==================================================

Attached are clean and blacklined copies of the revised execution copy of
the Central Bank Agreement.

Best regards.

 - COMPARE001.DOC
 - NY003678709.DOC


Lets try to get together this week if possible.  Kyle wants to go as well.
Let me know.

DG


Absolutely.

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 05/15/2001 06:02 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Override letter

Good point!  Can Peter start to draft an override letter?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/15/2001 05:55 PM

		 To: pthompson@akllp.com
		 cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Override letter

As a reminder to all of us, we will need a form override letter to go with
the form turbine contract.

Kay


Amy,

If it's not too late, would you please give Mike Carson a copy of his executed document to him?  Thanks.  He forgot to make a copy.

Fletch


Senator Bowen has canceled tomorrow's informational hearing on ESPs.


Harry,

Since physical steel is a new online product, I need to know from you whether
you are aware of any reason why any existing counterparty should not be able
to trade physical steel.  From your perspective, I would consider whether
there is any legal reason barring a counterparty incorporated out of the US
from buying physical steel, or whether you are aware of any current
litigation, payment disputes or other similar legal reasons which would
prevent an existing counterparty from trading physical steel.

Also, on a going forward basis, is there any legal impediments for any new
counterparties trading physical steel?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 10:22 AM -----

	Lisa Lees
	01/30/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Profiles for Steel Physical Products

Tana/Karen:

The product long descriptions below will fall under the new product types US
Steel Hot Rolled Physical.  Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the
profiles for the new product types from the following:

 US Steel Hot Rolled Fin Swap

Please respond no later than 10 a.m. on Wednesday, January 31.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 08:44 AM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  01/26/2001 05:19 PM

To: Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Steel Physical Products - approvals / profiles

I need approvals and customer profiles by Wednesday January 31 11:00 am.

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail).

US HR Steel Phy    12G 48W Chi A569    Feb-April 01   USD/NT m

A U.S Hot Rolled Steel Transaction with Enron North America Corp, under which
the Seller shall deliver and the Buyer shall take and pay for the Quantity of
the Goods at the Contract Price. The Contract Price shall be the price
submitted by Counterparty via EnronOnline.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Feb 2001
to the Termination Date of 31 April 2001.
The Transaction is for hot rolled steel with a Thickness of 12 Gauge and a
Width of 48 inches.  The Goods shall be commercial quality, prime, hot rolled
steel with specifications to ASTM A569 and tolerances to ASTM A568, unless
quality tolerances are outlined in Schedule 2 of the associated General Terms
and Conditions.  The transaction is F.O.B. Reserve Marine Terminal in
Chicago, Ill Metro Area.  The Quantity shall be Quantity submitted by
Counterparty via EnronOnline (5% greater or lesser allowance at Seller,s
option). Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a
Dispatch Period.  Enron will guarantee delivery by the last day of each
scheduled Dispatch Period and accept supply to the 20th of each scheduled
Dispatch Period.  Payment shall be made, against the receipt of the required
documents outlined in the General Terms and Conditions, in the Contractual
Currency by telegraphic transfer no later than 30 calendar days after the
date on which the Goods are released to Buyer.
The price is quoted in dollars (US) per unit of measure, which shall be the
Contractual Currency. The unit of measure against which the price is quoted
shall be net tons (2000 lbs) and the quantity shown shall be in net tons per
month.

US HR Steel Phy   5/16 48W ChiA635   Feb-April 01   USD/NT m

A U.S Hot Rolled Steel Transaction with Enron North America Corp, under which
the Seller shall deliver and the Buyer shall take and pay for the Quantity of
the Goods at the Contract Price. The Contract Price shall be the price
submitted by Counterparty via EnronOnline.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Feb 2001
to the Termination Date of 31 April 2001.
The Transaction is for hot rolled steel with a Thickness of 5/168 and a Width
of 48 inches.  The Goods shall be commercial quality, prime, hot rolled steel
with specifications and tolerances to ASTM A635, unless quality tolerances
are outlined in Schedule 2 of the associated General Terms and Conditions.
The transaction is F.O.B. Reserve Marine Terminal in Chicago, Ill Metro
Area.  The Quantity shall be Quantity submitted by Counterparty via
EnronOnline (5% greater or lesser allowance at Seller,s optionEach calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Dispatch Period.  Enron
will guarantee delivery by the last day of each scheduled Dispatch Period and
accept supply to the 20th of each scheduled Dispatch Period.  Payment shall
be made, against the receipt of the required documents outlined in the
General Terms and Conditions, in the Contractual Currency by telegraphic
transfer no later than 30 calendar days after the date on which the Goods are
released to Buyer.
The price is quoted in dollars (US) per unit of measure, which shall be the
Contractual Currency. The unit of measure against which the price is quoted
shall be net tons (2000 lbs) and the quantity shown shall be in net tons per
month.

==============================================================================
=====

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Thanks - Rob Cass  -  Melba Lozano
x35491   x58986

---------------------- Forwarded by Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 05:06
PM ---------------------------

Carl Carter@ENRON
01/25/2001 05:53 PM
To: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Naveed Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron, Sean
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Steel Long Descriptions - Physical Products

We plan on putting two new Physical Steel product types into Production
sometime next week. Jason Althaus already has the GT&Cs and will prepare them
for upload when the product types are available.
Included are final versions of the two short and long product descriptions.
Also included are spreadsheets detailing the location and quality
combinations that will initially be shown on the Website.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Carl


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000
02:30 PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
12/27/2000 02:25 PM
To: Dat Truong/Corp/Enron@Enron, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Hedges not linking to sitara deals

Dat and George, risk informed me of 2 additional sitara deals that are not
"linking" the hedges to the primary sitara deal.  Dat, can you please look
into this and let me know if this is a quick fix or not.  Risk is inquiring.
EOL #719279 and #713548 are the one's on question.

Tara and Torrey, what is happening is risk is not seeing a hedge attaching to
the sitara deal and manually booking the hedge.  But, the hedge is being
created, just not linked to the primary physical deal.

Jeff,  I will let you know when this is corrected.  Please advise your group
not to manually hedge the deals in sitara.  If in doubt if it is hedged, have
them type in the next number after the sitara number which should be the
hedge.  For example, the physical deal is 547092, the hedge will be 547093.
Let me know if you have any further questions.

Thanks,
Dawn
3-9353


met some girl from your hometown named ivana or something.  she works at
dynegy.


Hey All-

Please read the following email and let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
April Hrach
Administrative Coordinator
Phone: 415-782-7825
Fax: 415-782-7851
----- Forwarded by April Hrach/SF/ECT on 07/19/2001 01:55 PM -----

	Wilma Bleshman/ENRON@enronXgate 07/19/2001 12:41 PM 	   To: April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT, Gary Bode/ENRON@enronxgate, Dalak Malik/ENRON@enronxgate, Deborah Kelly/ENRON@enronxgate, Christina Albers/ENRON@enronXgate, Jason Chumley/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Cyndi Wulfson/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: San Francisco's Outlook Migration

April,

My plans are to visit your office the week of July 30th.  We have 20 people that need to be migrated. I would like to migrate 10 people on Monday and 10 people on Tuesday. Migrations are done at night, therefore, Tuesday and Wednesday morning I will  configure everyone's Outlook.  The rest of the time I'll be training everyone and setting everything up to best fit people's needs.

A copy of the NA Email Retention / Policy is attached.

However, due to legal issues we are currently experiencing with the San Francisco office, this will not go into affect yet. We will not purge anyone's Lotus Notes mailboxes. Notes will be available to you for referencing.

Only 30 days worth of information will be transferred from Notes to Outlook.  Once on Outlook, we will still hold off on purging.
Nevertheless, when the legal issues clear, we will reinforce our policy.

Thank you for your time,

Wilma Bleshman
Enron Networks
713-853-1562


Someone needs to call Jerry Graves or myself to schedule a pig run.  We will need to have some coordination to flow gas from the P-3 side
of the Canadian station to ensure you enough gas to run the pig to feldman.
With max flows from the P-2 area they can run a pig from P-2 to P-3 anytime.  It just needs to be coordinated with the teams and gas
control.
Mickey, hope this answers you questions.  If not call me.

Let us know.

ds   713-853-4299

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lowe, Mickey
Sent:	Monday, February 25, 2002 11:15 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Cc:	Lebeau, Randy; Canadian-North, Team
Subject:	TW Lines

I had sent you an email in regards to pigging on the TW 24" Panhandle Lateral and the TW 12" Leedey Lateral. I haven't heard anything and wanted to make sure you are still the person that we need to visit with on getting these task resolved. If not, please let me know who we need to talk to.

The problem is we haven't ran a pig on these lines in years. In order to insure our pipeline integrity, we need to work through these obstacles and get something resolved. We know we have lots of liquid in these lines and need to proceed with pigging.

Please let me know what we need to do to get this accomplished.

Thanks,
Mickey


You probably saw the announcement that Mike Mcconnell is now CEO of Enron
Global Markets.  EGM will be focussing on a number of new and existing
markets (including coal, LNG, crude and products, interest rates,
agricultural commodities, equities, weather, etc).  One of the markets Mike's
group is actively considering is transport capacity.  I mentioned your work
in the area.  He is anxious to see it and meet with you after he has had a
chance to review it.


You have two problems

(i) Unwind of interest rate swap ($2.3mm)
(ii) Mismatch of money from swap versus interest rate swap. (approximately ($9mm) is not offset)

Louise

-----Original Message-----
From: Killen, Faith
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: RE: ECP Interest Rate Swap

yes, we took $1.3M for the Nymex swap against this

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:35 AM
To: Killen, Faith
Subject: RE: ECP Interest Rate Swap

Did we take the money against this from the nymex swap?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Rick, we received your recommendation.  Please let us know if Mr. Lay, Mr. Whalley and your Human Resource Representative concurs and then we will type up the resolution to appoint Mr. Port as a Vice President of Enron Corp.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buy, Rick
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 7:56 AM
To:	Moore, Georgene
Subject:	RE: MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE - OFFICER ELECTIONS

I recommend David Port for position of Vice President. Rick Buy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moore, Georgene
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Bowen Jr., Raymond; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Delainey, David W.; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Haedicke, Mark E.; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven J.; Koenig, Mark; Lay, Kenneth; McMahon, Jeffrey; Whalley, Greg; 'ISHERRIFF@BTINTERNET.COM'
Cc:	Blackwood, Connie; Chapman, Kay; Daw, Nicki; Ferrari, Kerry; Fleming, Rosalee; Ford, Sue; Harris, Stephanie J ; Heathman, Karen K.; Elbertson, Janette; Williamson, Joannie; Marshall, Lucy; McVicker, Maureen; Schiller, Marsha; Stark, Cindy; Taylor, Liz; Wells, Tori L.; Westbrook, Sharron; Mendez, Yorleni
Subject:	MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE - OFFICER ELECTIONS

IF THERE ARE ANY MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS  FOR NEW OFFICERS OF ENRON CORP. OR ITS DIVISIONS PLEASE ADVISE BEFORE WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 19TH IN PREPARATION FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING. THANK YOU.


At about the same time the National Association of Gas Consumers filed their
complaint calling for a nationwide benchmark price for natural gas sales, the
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power filed a petition for reimposition
of the price cap on short-term capacity release and pipeline capacity
transactions.  LADWP's petition was basically the same as the request for
emergency relief filed by San Diego Gas & Electric in December, which FERC is
still considering.  We have answered LADWP's petition incorporating our
comments in San Diego and have asked that the two proceedings be consolidated
since the issues are the same and parties have already expended a lot of time
and effort in providing data to FERC in San Diego.

We did not receive FERC's notice on the LADWP petition that was issued Monday
until yesterday, and responses are due today, so we did not have enough time
to circulate our attached filing for review and comments.


The report named:
<http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=6&report_name
=Storage+P/L&category_cd=4&category_name=TEXAS&toc_hide=1&sTV1=4&TV1Exp=
Y&current_efct_date=06/05/2001> Storage P/L, published as of 06/05/2001
is now available for viewing on the website.


Re:  ENA El Paso deal.  The trade press is having a heyday with the
"anticompetitive" angle.  Lets talk.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/04/2000
10:17 AM ---------------------------
ET & S Business Intelligence
From: Lorna Brennan on 12/30/99 09:18 AM
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lou
Geiler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Klimesh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sarabeth Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Sova/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rob Wilson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lon
Stanton/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hartfield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Badura/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Janet Bowers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig
Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret
Fritch/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morgan
Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Brenda Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Harvey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana
Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jane Joyce/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Therese Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Mangels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Penny McCarran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vernon
Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Perry/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Loren Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ken
Powers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joan Schwieger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Sebesta/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank Semin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Neal
Shaw/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Threet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Ullom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Valley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Chuck Wilkinson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Wiltfong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Lagerstrom/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ray Stelly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Stevens/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Sue M Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Barry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Miriam Martinez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Don
Powell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Tosoni/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael G Stage/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Johanson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: The El Paso Controversy Continues

Enron-El Paso Deal Could Mute Competition to CA

     Fearing an end to pipeline competition in California, the state's
regulators and Indicated
     Shippers have called on FERC to summarily reject the three
transportation agreements by
     which Enron North America Corp. has contracted for 1.25 Bcf/d of
unsubscribed firm
     capacity on El Paso Natural Gas.

     Approval of these agreements would give Enron Corp., parent of
Transwestern Pipeline
     and Enron North America, control over all the available transportation
capacity to the
     southern California border, warned Harvey Morris, principal attorney for
the California
     Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), which plans to submit its protest
today. Between
     the two pipelines, he estimated Enron will control 2.34 Bcf/d of firm
capacity from the
     San Juan and Permian basins to California.

     For Morris, Enron North America's contracting of the El Paso capacity
represents a
     worse threat to the pipeline's other shippers than Dynegy Marketing and
Trade, who has
     held the capacity for past two years and whose contract expires Dec. 31.
"At least then
     there was some Transwestern competition to the Dynegy situation. Now
it's Enron, the
     owner of Transwestern, who's stepping into Dynegy's shoes."

     But "what's even worse," he told NGI, is the revenue-sharing provision
in the contracts. It
     stipulates that "after Enron makes $35 million off of these contracts,
it has to share the
     proceeds with El Paso for 25% of anything beyond $35 million. So
effectively, Enron and
     El Paso have become partners in how high they can jack up the
transportation rate
     differential between the California border and the Southwest producing
basins."

     The two pipeline companies "that have for decades competed with each
other in carrying
     Southwest supplies to California are now partners. We think that's
anticompetitive, and
     there's no way FERC should approve it," Morris said. He recalled the
basis differential
     between the San Juan Basin spot price and the California border shot up
by 17% during
     1998, the first year during which Dynegy controlled the El Paso capacity
into California.
     This situation could worsen under Enron, he believes.

     "At first blush the El Paso-Enron contracts [do] not appear to contain
the same
     anticompetitive features of the El Paso-Dynegy contracts," Indicated
Shippers noted, but
     a "closer review and analysis" reveals the anticompetitive effects of
the revenue-sharing
     provision (RSP) in El Paso-Enron contracts "are not only similar" to
those of the hotly
     contested reservation-reduction mechanism (RRM) in the El Paso-Dynegy
case, "but are
     increased......due to the fact that the contracts are with a marketing
affiliate of El Paso's
     primary interstate pipeline competitor," Transwestern.

     Both the RRM and RSP "operate to provide a disincentive for El Paso and
its competitors
     to compete against each other, or to take any other action that will act
to drive down the
     basis differential that defines the market value of the capacity,"
Indicated Shippers told
     FERC in a protest filed on Wednesday [RP97-287-041]. The group includes
producers
     Amoco Production, Burlington Resources Oil and Gas, Marathon Oil, and
Phillips
     Petroleum, and two marketers - Amoco Energy Trading and Phillips Gas
Marketing.

     FERC "should reject the tariff filing immediately. The Commission erred
in allowing the
     El Paso-Dynegy contracts to remain intact for their two-year term after
finding that the
     contracts were anticompetitive. This issue is pending in the [D.C. Court
of Appeals].
     That same error should not be repeated here," the producers and
marketers said.

     The CPUC's attempt to block the Enron-El Paso contracts at the outset is
a little bit
     unusual for the agency, Morris said, but it learned its lesson following
Dynegy. "When the
     Dynegy situation first hit, we asked for FERC to investigate the matter.
We thought
     FERC did a very inadequate job then.....This time around we're asking
for FERC to
     summarily reject it. It's hard for an agency like ours to take such a
strong stand right at
     the beginning, but we've learned too much from two years of suffering
under the Dynegy
     situation. And this is even worse."

     In the event the Commission should reject California's request, the CPUC
has asked that
     an "anti-hoarding condition" be included in the contracts, which would
require Enron to
     release unused capacity into the short-term market at a price higher
than what it's paying
     El Paso for the capacity. "They must make a little profit," Morris
noted. "We're confident
     Enron can't use the entire 1.2 Bcf/d of capacity.....so there's going to
be unused
     capacity."

     The agency also wants FERC to clarify that the primary delivery point
for the Block II
     portion of the capacity (579MMcf/d) is PG&E-Topock in keeping with the
terms of the
     1996 settlement between El Paso and its customers. Morris said he agreed
fully with
     Amoco, Burlington Resources and Southern California Gas (SoCalGas),
which accused
     El Paso of violating the 1996 agreement by allowing Dynegy to use
SoCalGas-Topock as
     a primary delivery point for the Block II capacity last summer. They
contend the alleged
     violation is included in the Enron contracts.

     He also noted the CPUC will challenge the ability of Enron to call back
Block II capacity
     after it already had been recalled by El Paso shippers to serve Pacific
Gas and Electric
     (PG&E) customers in northern California. Last July, FERC granted Dynegy
the right to
     do this under its contracts with El Paso. But Morris contends the
decision violates the
     1996 settlement under which PG&E paid $54 million to preserve the right
of the pipeline's
     shippers to recall the Block II capacity to serve end-users in its
service territory.

     The CPUC also intends to challenge the Commission's decision that would
enable Enron
     to "just sit on the capacity," thereby withholding idle Block II
capacity from the market.
     Indicated Shippers also contend the Enron contracts violate the Block II
capacity
     provisions of the 1996 rate case, as well as "exacerbate" the primary
firm delivery point
     capacity-allocation issues that are pending before FERC now.

     The CPUC accused El Paso of "deliberately" filing the Enron contracts at
FERC just
     before the holidays to avoid controversy. The pipeline "is trying to
sneak one of the most
     controversial things ever past FERC right before Christmas so that
protests would be
     minimized," said Morris. "They did this with the Dynegy contracts two
years ago. They
     have a pattern of filing right at the last minute, making it harder for
people to protest and
     harder for FERC to stop it from going into effect."

,Copyright 1999 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding
news report may not
be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without
prior written consent
of Intelligence Press, Inc.


Richard, here is the first work assignment for Paul.

I will keep you posted.

Randy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pais, Randy
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 6:16 PM
To:	'pl@flsdlaw.com'
Subject:	Draft Deerfield LLC Water Agreement  Privileged and Confidential

Dear Paul,

As I mentioned during our earlier discussions one of the projects that Enron has been working on is a potential power plant/site in Deerfield, FL.  There are alot of unknowns on whether this project in the current environment with respect to energy development in Florida and Enron in particular will go forward.  We will probably know more toward the end of the year.

As part of the process, if it goes forward, we will be a need to obtain a Water Agreement.  I believe there may have been some preliminary discussions months ago with the County concerning water requirements but nothing has occurred recently. At this time our folks do not want to talk with County about it for some reason.

However, assuming that we might need a water agreement at sometime and probably on short notice, I decided at least to prepare a draft and thus be in position to talk with the County when and if the discussions ever to proceed.  The commercial provisions are not finalized yet but the draft contains what I think our folks may need.

I would appreciate your reviewing this draft and providing me your thoughts and any suggested changes.  I will call you next week to discuss this in more detail.  From a strategy standpoint we are not in position at this time to talk with the County or to let them know we may be preparing a draft.

Have a great weekend.

Thanks for your help.

Randy

Randall M. Pais
Legal Department
Enron Wholesale Services
Phone: 713-345-2520
Fax:     713-646-6280
randy.pais@enron.com


Attached is the LOI with my comments redlined.  Let me know if you have any questions.


As the November elections approach, I encourage everyone to exercise your right to be heard and to make a difference through your vote.  To do so, you'll need to have a valid voter's registration.  If you do need to register, please visit your county's website or call your county election officials to learn the procedures and timing.

For Houston-based employees:
The deadline for voter registration in Texas is October 9.  Voter registration forms are available at the InfoZone in the lobby, but if you choose to mail your form please allow enough time for the postal service to deliver your form.  See the following list if you need to obtain election information pertaining to Harris and surrounding counties.  As the election date nears, Harris county voters' guides will be available at the InfoZone in the lobby.

Harris		713-368-2309
Montgomery	936-539-7843
Waller		979-826-7643
Brazoria	979-864-1320
Fort Bend	281-341-8670
Liberty		936-336-4629
Chambers	409-267-8301
Galveston	409-766-2280


Enron Methanol nominates the following natural gas requirements for the
Methanol Plant for April 2001:

30,000 mmbtu per day

EGPFC nominates the following natural gas requirements for the MTBE Plant at
Morgan's Point for April 2001:

8,500 mmbtu per day


Shari,

# of Producer Services deals in Apr:  439 existing
                  5 new
             444 Total


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
3/1/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
3/1/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
3/1/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 920,278
3/1/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 174,427
3/1/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 1,051,128


Qiana 53979, booked 6/14/00


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
03:16 PM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, val.generes@ac.com, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Bhatia/HOU/EES@EES, Micah Hatten/HOU/EES@EES,
David Fontana/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Cross your fingers


Here it is.

1. Dave Baumbach
2. Matt Lenhart
3. Bryan Hull
4. Mick Walters
5. O'neal Winfree
6. Hector/Lenny/Brian
7. Eric Bass
8. Harry Bucalo
9. Jason Bass
10. Phillip Love
11. Ramiro
12. Gary Lamphier


Ken,

We currently have a unit down at Station 4.  If you need to work on something now is the time to do it and not wait until June.

DS

	  From:  Kenneth Young                           05/30/2001 11:50 PM

To:	Randy Johnson/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Matt Francis/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Beebe/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jonny Hendricks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronnie Morse/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Carbajal/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ralph Mireles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Kingman-Sta1/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Flagstaff-Sta2/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Flagstaff-Sta3/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Gallup-Sta4/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Graves/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve SanMiguel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stoney Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve SanMiguel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Gary Maestas/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	TW 1090 Project Schedule - Stations 1-4

I made a quick change to add analysis of Station 3 & 4 during the week of June 18th.


Donna and Richard

Here are more as promised (including the correct Equity Comparables report).
Call me if you have any questions.

John


Shirley,

Please fix the time with her.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001
08:47 AM ---------------------------

"Kate Szablya" <kate@powerbrokersllc.com> on 04/04/2001 04:27:43 PM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Joao Neves

Thank you Vince.  I look forward to speaking with you tomorrow, and in
meeting you on April 13th!

Regards,

Kate Szablya

Power Brokers, LLC
Energy Search and Recruitment
303-716-2987
303-619-7589 cell
303-716-3426 fax
www.powerbrokersllc.com


Richard,
 Please change the confirm to provide for signature by both ENA and the
counterparty.

	Richard Deming@ENRON
	05/21/2001 03:09 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: WPS Energy Services Inc.

Dan,

Please find below details of Phy Gas deals with GTC agreements:


The letter looks good.  A couple of comments for your consideration:

On page three we describe the change to the definition of Public Utility and
then argue that we don't fit into it.  Would it be worth explaining why that
makes sense?  Specifically, the New Jersey restructuring law, like most
efforts of its kind in other markets, is designed to separate the competitive
from monopoly elements of the power (and gas) businesses.  Economic
regulation would then be restricted to the remaining monopoly elements of the
business (eg distribution).  The competitive market can not be solely relied
upon to "regulate" the behavior of monopoly asset owners, such as
distribution utilities.  Therefore, regulators continue to be called upon to
set pricing and other terms of service.  What those regulators decide matters
a great deal to those monopoly utilities and it consequently makes sense for
lawmakers to be concerned about attempts by such entities to use campaign
contributions to tacitly influence decision makers.  The same public policies
simply do not apply to that portion of the market which is competitive.  The
generation and sales business has a competitive structure (i.e. relatively
low barriers to entry, multiple competitors etc.).  These components of the
power and gas business can be "regulated" by the market with respect to rates
and terms of service.  They do not require economic regulation any more than
grocery stores, department stores, appliance sellers or other "retailers"
(who presumably are not prohibited from making contributions.  Competition
and markets discipline behavior and establish competitive prices and terms of
service.  Because regulators don't set the prices and terms of service for
such sellers, there is no reason to be concerned about campaign
contribuitions from such organizations.  Indeed, the legislation, and the
legislative history, clearly conform to this underlying policy rationale.
As a former practicing lawyer, I certainly understand the value of pleading
in the alternative.  But, I question how certain of our arguments woud be
perceived by the public if they ever came to light (which these documents
have a habit of doing).. .  I can just see the press seizing on Enron's claim
of "ignorance or mistake" or the fact that we pled for the favorable exercise
of "prosecutorial discretion".  I suggest that we add whatever we feel is
necessary to the very solid looking intent argument, not make specific
reference to "ignorance or mistake", and not plead for the favorable
esxercise of PD.  If we feel we need to write about this last item, perhaps
we could suggest that it would be a waste of the public's resources to pursue
a claim under such circumstances.


EnronOnline
Putting the energy into ecommerce

and now

Taking the big deal out of the big deal.

Did we TM these?

Paul was doing all of this before he left.


Sam,

Here it is.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           03/05/2001 08:23 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Kaminski Column

Good morning, Vince.  Did you get a chance to put a little something together
for today's newsletter?

Sam


Daren - After checking with MIPS, you are correct.  Jan. 1 only flowed 19
dth.  The 5882 dth was a bad estimate.  A better estimate was received on
1/7/00.
Sorry about all the confusion.

AL

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 09:14
AM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   01/10/2001 09:00 AM

To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter 1517

Gary - We did not deliver gas to Phillips on Dec. 1.  Also, I am not sure if
the plant was down, but we did not deliver to them on Dec. 2-4.  If you have
any questions, please let me know.

Aimee

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           01/10/2001 08:55 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter 1517

Phillips said we shorted them gas on December 1st so they pulled it on
January 1.  Can we verify that we did not deliver 5,00 on Dec. 1?  If that is
the case and this was a firm sale, we owe him some gas at Dec Index less
(.045).  Which is bad!  Let me know what happened in Dec before I can put
this deal out in Jan.

Daren J Farmer
01/09/2001 02:25 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 1517

Gary,

Have you negotiated a price on this?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001
02:25 PM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   01/02/2001 02:14 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 1517

Daren - meter 1517 has a nom of 0/day for Jan.  It flowed about 5.400 on day
1. This is a valid flow.  Could you please extend the deal from Dec. (deal #
506192) or create a new one?  Thanks.

AL


Please plan to attend the Quarterly Managing Director Meeting scheduled for Monday, October 22.  An agenda will be distributed at the meeting.

Meeting details are as follows:

Monday, October 22
8:30 - Noon
Hyatt Regency
Dogwood Room (located on the 3rd floor)

A video connection will be made from the London office.

Please call if you have any questions.
Joannie
3-1769


This is Dan's first cut at the answers.  Please edit and return those to
Allison Navin by 4:00 (EST) today, if possible.
----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 01/29/2001 12:15 PM -----

	JDWatkiss@aol.com
	01/29/2001 12:03 PM

		 To: Linda.Robertson@enron.com, tabors@tca-us.com, npickover@bracepatt.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Q&As for Steve Kean

are attached.

Jeffrey D. ("Dan") Watkiss
jdwatkiss@aol.com
 - stevekean.wpd


Had to split the document.   This was the message that came back to me..  The
message could not be delivered because the remote server returned the
following error:
  552 Message exceeds permitted size

The other will follow.  Please advise when received.  Thanks.

 <<003732482.NYW>>

Carmen Ferrer
Global Energy & Project Finance Group
Credit  First
Suisse  Boston
11 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10010
212-325-2867
212-325-8322
carmen.ferrer@csfb.com

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - 003732482.NYW


There has been a change in the monthly dinner meeting as follows:

  DATE:   August 14, 2000
  PLACE:   The Map Room
      Brennan's
      3300 Smith
      713/522-9711
  TIME:    6:30 PM

Please make a note of these changes.  I will look forward to seeing you
there.


Mike, duly noted; however, there will be at this point no change in the scope
and function of Redmond's group.

Thanks
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
12:48 PM ---------------------------

Mike Coleman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/10/2000 12:36 PM
To: ddelain2@ect.enron.com
cc: Wayne Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron North America to Enron Americas--Redefinition of Technical
Role?

Dave,

Congratulations on an apparently expanded role.  I know you have a lot more
important issues to deal with at the moment, but will the Enron Americas
organization result in a change in the role of the technical group and
resource requirements?   When you have a chance to discuss the implications
(if any) it might be worth discussing.

Also, on a personal note, if there are new roles associated with the Enron
Americas org for which I might be qualified, I'd certainly be interested in
any new opportunities that come about.

Thanks!

Mike


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/26/2001 06:18 PM -----

	Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/26/2001 12:31 PM

		 To: Ban Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim
Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Andrews/ENRON@enronXgate, Jennifer
Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Here are the latest stranded cost numbers.

This analysis is based on internal curves.  Please do not release without
approval from Belden or S. Kean.  We will try to redo the analysis using
public forward curve numbers but in the mean time ...

The biggest refinement is that I made an adjustment for the fact that many
contracts are gas indexed and their price falls.  Both gas and electricity
have fallen since DWR released their numbers in late May.  I was able to
replicate the total contract cost of $41 billion, which gives me some
confidence in the approximations I have made.

The bottom line numbers are out at columns AB to AF

Executed only, undiscounted and discounted ($million)
 8,098      6,456
Executed and Agreement In Principal, undiscounted and discounted ($million)
 13,840     10,639

In otherwords, the $20 billion number I quoted earlier is down to $13.8
billion due to the adjustment for gas costs.

Comments welcome.


Hello all:

According to the email below, we are going to have to bill your cell phone
invoices to your credit cards and receive reimbursement on an expense
report.

If you want me to do this, I will be glad to - I will just need your credit
card
number that you want it billed to.  I think it will only have to be done one
time and then they will automatically bill it to your card.

Let me know.

Thanks!

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000
03:27 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Corp Accounts Payable Department @ ENRON
06/22/2000 06:54 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Reimbursement of Individually Billed Items

The use of cell phones and pagers has increased dramatically in the past few
years.  As a result the Accounts Payable department has seen a rapid increase
in the number of invoices and vendors.  With the higher volume, we have
reviewed our processes in order to continue our rapid payment cycle.

Although we encourage vendors to address their invoices to individual
employees, they often mail invoices directly to Accounts Payable.  At times
they fail to list the individual who uses the pager or cell phone.  In these
cases we return the invoice to the vendor.  If the employee is designated, we
try to track him/her down and forward the invoice.  The high level of
employee movement among jobs and locations at Enron has made this
increasingly challenging.  Either way, we end up doing something less
productive than paying invoices.

To maintain satisfactory response to our vendors and to reduce time necessary
for research, we request that employees who have pagers, cell phones, and
other individually billed items such as licenses, subscriptions, etc., pay
for them by personal check or charge card (if applicable*payment instructions
are usually indicated on the invoice) and request reimbursement through
employee expense reports.

By submitting these charges on your expense report, you can help us reduce
the amount of time spent researching and forwarding invoices, the number of
checks generated by Treasury, the number of vendors in our database, and the
turnaround time for payment of invoices.


Twanda Sweet
Enron North America Corp.
EB3822
(713) 853-9402
twanda.sweet@enron.com


Fyi.  This is the EES reorganization memo.
Janine
----- Forwarded by Janine Migden/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001 10:23 AM -----

	Nicole Schwartz@EES
	03/28/2001 09:02 AM

		 To: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: all employee meeting

hope this one works...sorry for the delay.

---------------------- Forwarded by Nicole Schwartz/HOU/EES on 03/28/2001
09:01 AM ---------------------------

Janine Migden@ENRON

03/28/2001 08:50 AM

To: Nicole Schwartz/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:

Can you try sending me the email on the reorg.  Still didn't get it.

Thanks.

Janine