Yes
--------------------------
Rick S.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D. <James.D.Steffes@ENRON.com>
To: Novosel, Sarah <Sarah.Novosel@ENRON.com>; Shapiro, Richard <Richard.Shapiro@ENRON.com>; Robertson, Linda <Linda.Robertson@ENRON.com>
CC: Sullivan, Lora <Lora.Sullivan@ENRON.com>; Dernehl, Ginger <Ginger.Dernehl@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Oct 22 09:09:15 2001
Subject: RTO Cost/Benefit Analysis

Can we have breakfast Wednesday morning at the Park Hyatt to discuss where we are and necessary next steps?  Given Southern's statements (as well as others), this is the key analysis that would hold up this from moving forward.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	Novosel, Sarah; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: RTO case studies and analysis -- Update

Progress?

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Novosel, Sarah
	Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:46 PM
	To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
	Subject:	RE: RTO case studies and analysis -- Update

	I spoke with Seabrom Adamson and Kevin Wollenus (sp?) about a cost/benefit study.  Seab said that they are not set up to do a detailed modeling analysis, but that Tabors has the programs already set up and could probably do some type of a modeling analysis.  However, we discussed what other type of study we could do, and we came up with a few ideas.

	Seab said that there are general benefits to RTO formation:  e.g., transmission expansion (although you still have siting problems, RTOs will build new transmission where it is needed); administrative cost savings; savings from reserve sharing.  We also discussed the arguments of the cheap power states.  For example, many of the southeastern states oppose RTOs because they fear losing their low cost power.  But Seab points out that RTOs do not mean that the states "lose" their low cost power.  The PSCs retain their authority to decide whether their utilities can or cannot sell power from their plants to third parties.  The PSCs can prohibit utilities from exporting low cost power if it is needed to serve local retail customers.  Seab thought this response to a potential "cost" of RTOs could also be worked into the analysis.

	Seab and Kevin are going to give the issue more thought and put together a proposal.  The problem is timing.  Seab has California testimony due on November 6 and he expects to be tied up with that for the next 2 weeks.  If we use the cost/benefit study as part of our NOPR comments (due end of Nov - mid Dec), then he will have enough time.  If we want to present a study before that time (perhaps with comments on RTO week), he will not be able to do the work.  Seab will have a proposal by COB tomorrow or perhaps Monday morning.

	I have a call in to Tabors to discuss the same proposal with him.

	Larry Ruff is on vacation this week.  He's back on Monday.  We can call him then.

	Rick, you also named a few other people:  Charles Stallon, Eric Wolchek, the Brattle Group.  Should I put calls in to these people as well?  Let me know.

	Sarah

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Shapiro, Richard
		Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:05 PM
		To:	Novosel, Sarah; Steffes, James D.
		Subject:	FW: RTO case studies and analysis

		Where are we on getting our study jumpstarted? Time is of the essence.

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Shelk, John
		Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:06 AM
		To:	Shortridge, Pat; Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Philipp, Meredith
		Subject:	RE: RTO case studies and analysis

		I am going through all of my notes and testimony from the hearings to put together a list of issues like this that we need to address.  The best way to do this in a disciplined, orderly manner is to start with Sarah and other regulatory folks here and also share a list of these issues with folks in Houston to figure out the best way to respond in short order.  Pat is correct that the "no studies" point was a common refrain from Southern and others at the House RTO hearing yesterday.

			 -----Original Message-----
			From: 	Shortridge, Pat
			Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:54 AM
			To:	Shelk, John; Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Philipp, Meredith
			Subject:	RTO case studies and analysis

			A point floating out there that we need to bat down: There are no studies or analysis showing cost-benefit on RTOs.  Is that true?  If it's false, can we get copies of the pro-RTO studies that exist?


FYI, refer to previous note.
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
07:06 PM ---------------------------

Christopher F Calger
02/06/2001 06:38 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CDWR Summary for Ken Lay

I made one adjustment - Pastoria offer is $58.80.


Kay:

I'd like to talk to you about this in the morning...

-----Original Message-----
From: MedleyB@gtlaw.com@ENRON
Sent: Wed 5/23/2001 12:19 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben; awhite2@enron.com; Krimsky, Steven
Cc:
Subject: There is one more revision Debbie made in Paragraph 2b.

 <<7BHL07!.DOC>> I have blacklined it for your convenience.  Please call her
with any comments you may have.

_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.

 - 7BHL07!.DOC <<7BHL07!.DOC>>


Hi Cheryl,

I'm looking for the executed version of the contract with Westinghouse for
the 501D turbine, which I believe was originally headed to Panama.  ENA is
looking to use it in a project or two, and I need to give a look.  An
electronic version would be fine.

Thanks,

Kay


Melissa Murphy is out sick this week.

Here is the weekly report of Financial trades confirmed last week.

Thank you,
amy


I think that sounds like a great idea. It doesn't really serve a purpose to
have all the time zones as a choice in Deal Blotter if EnPower is going to
sort them out anyway. We're just doubling up on the work that the application
already knows how to do. In the meantime, I'll sort through these deal
numbers and change time zones that flow over the first week in April. Let me
know if that sounds good.

Kate

Cara Semperger
03/26/2001 11:01 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: More deals found by Will Smith

Yep, the time zone glitch.  I think he was looking at all deals in the
system.  I almost think we should deal with this April, and worry about the
rest when it comes up.   Will and I are also kicking around making the only
choice in deal entry PPT.  Let Enpower sort out the rest.  We can modify
stuff on the strip level, but PPT would be the only choice in blotter and at
the top of regular deal entry.

How does that sound?

c

   Kate Symes                03/26/2001 10:55 AM

To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: More deals found by Will Smith

I'm unclear as to what Will found in these deals that needs to be looked at.
The first one (scary!!) has notes in the comments section of each leg that
say it was terminated on 9/30/98; however, there are still forward deal legs
that haven't been killed or zeroed out. I don't think I could consider myself
a deal control professional on this one - I'll need to talk to a trader. But
let me know what you want me to look for in the remaining deals. Is this part
of the time zone glitch?

Kate

Cara Semperger
03/26/2001 10:47 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: More deals found by Will Smith

Do you want to look into these, the first one made me nearly wet my pants!  I
think I want a deal control professional on this one.............   :)


Last chance to score an A+!

Sign up for Enron Federal Credit Union's
Student Loan Workshop today!

Tuesday, February 12
12:00 - 1:00 pm
  Doubletree Post Oak Hotel
2001 Post Oak Blvd.

Email joy.wagman@enron.com
to reserve your desk.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Here's a suggestion for the equipment question:

ENA and its affiliates have contractual rights to numerous turbines, several
of which can satisfy the technical and scheduling requirements of this
project, and some of which are already manufactured.  In the case of turbines
still in the manufacturing process, ENA has firm commitments for delivery,
backed by liquidated damages clauses and other financial incentives.

"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 08/25/2000 07:40:52 AM
To: "Fine, Jonathan" <JFine@kilstock.com>, "'Reagan'" <Rorschak@enron.com>,
"'John Moore'" <John.Moore@enron.com>, "'Heather Kroll'"
<Heather.Kroll@enron.com>, "'Kay Mann'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "'Ozzie Pagan'"
<Ozzie.Pagan@enron.com>, "'Tom Chapman'" <Tom.Chapman@enron.com>, "'Jeffrey
Keenan'" <Jeffrey.Keenan@enron.com>, "'Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com'"
<Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com>
cc: "Grigg, Mary" <mgrigg@kilstock.com>

Subject: RE: Response to Public Staff Data Request

I have received material from Reagan in response to Question No. 5--thanks.
Reagan, do you have problems providing the total project cost under seal?
We can file as is, but I expect the public Staff will want to follow up.
Also, we do have the cost data, and are filing that under seal.  I have
indicated that we will file the supporting documentation next Tuesday.   The
only thing we are awaiting to day is the paragraph explaining that turbines
are indeed available.

I did want to call your attention to the fact that I took a sentence out of
the response to No. 17 regarding Enron's intent to operate the plant as a
merchant facility after the expiration of the PPA.  You have been very
straightforward about that and it is clear from the rest of the answer.
However, given the Commission's skittishness about merchant facilities, I
would rather not highlight it.

We would like to file the responses by the end of the day, with the
exception of the supporting documentation on the cost data.

-----Original Message-----
From: Fine, Jonathan
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 4:18 PM
To: 'Reagan Rorschach'; John Moore; Heather Kroll; Kay Mann; Ozzie
Pagan; Tom Chapman; Jeffrey Keenan
Cc: Duncan, Allyson; Grigg, Mary
Subject: Response to Public Staff Data Request

Attached is the latest draft of our responses to the Public Staff's data
requests.  Please let us know of any suggested revisions or other comments
you may have.  Once cost data (Request No. 1), other facility data (Request
No. 5) and some more information regarding the turbine purchase source
(Request No. 11) is received, we will file the responses shortly thereafter.
Intervention deadline is Sept. 8.

We did just a few minor edits of what John and Heather e-mailed to us --
nothing substantive.

Question:  Do you need us to set up "Edgecombe Development Co., LLC" here as
a NC LLC?  Just let me know.  We have some folks that can do that for you
quite efficiently.

Look forward to your comments.  Thank you.

Jonathan M. Fine
Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP
3737 Glenwood Ave., Ste. 400
Raleigh, NC 27612
TEL: (919) 420-1700
FAX: (919) 420-1800
http://www.kilstock.com


RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- TUESDAY, JANUARY 29, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------
Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry
   to view the complete version, please go to:
   http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=210
------------------------------------------------------------


I will be there at 8:40 on Monday -- not a word until then...


Claudio:
Leslie Hansen in the power group is going to help me on this.  She is not
available to meet until next Wednesday so I have asked my secretary to set up
a meeting for then.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Claudio Ribeiro@ENRON
	06/29/2000 02:16 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PJM Power Demand

Carol,

I am helping the Weather Desk to develop a new product (PJM Power Demand). It
will initially be traded only internally.

I send you a presentation of the product and its description for EOL.

I think that we should schedule a time, so that we can discuss the product.

Thanks,

Claudio


Okay - let me know if you need anything later.

Kate

Lester Rawson
03/14/2001 07:34 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal approval

Kate,

Never Mind I found my problem.

Les


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Oscar Dalton/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000 05:34
PM ---------------------------

	Yvonne Marr @ ENRON
	01/18/2000 05:29 PM

To: Oscar Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Conference Room for Weds

Oscar,

I found two separate conference rooms for tomorrow, Wednesday 1/19 for your
meetings.  They are:

10 a.m. to 12 p.m. Conference Room 42C2

2 p.m. to 3 p.m.   Conference Room 32C2

Please let me know if you need help with anything else.

ym


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 03/09/2000
11:49 AM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara
03/09/2000 11:19 AM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Attachment: Seabron FERC Notes, Confidential

I already sent this to Mary.  Some interesting quotes from Dick O'Neill.  Let
mw know if any of you want to see Seabron's paper
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 03/09/2000 11:18
AM ---------------------------

"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com> on 03/08/2000 10:47:00 AM
Please respond to "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
To: "Darrell Stovall" <darrell.stovall@uaecorp.com>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "William F Hall III" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
"Bill Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Bob Escalante"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Duane Nelsen" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Frank
Misseldine" <frank_misseldine@opsi.oxbow.com>, "Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>,
"Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Milton Schultz" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>,
"Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Robert Frees"
<freesrj@apci.com>, "Roger Pelote" <rpelote@energy.twc.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Tom Heller" <hellertj@apci.com>, "Tandy McMannes"
<mcmannes@aol.com>, "Susan J Mara" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Rob Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Randy Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Lynn
Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Kent Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <ken_hoffman@fpl.com>, "Jim Willey" <jwilley@conpwr.com>, "Janet
Heck-Doyle" <jheckdoyle@aol.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Greg
Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen
Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "Ed Maddox" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>,
"Dave Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>
cc: "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Andy Brown" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Jan
Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>
Subject: Attachment: Seabron FERC Notes, Confidential

Trying this again.? Attached are Seabron's  Notes to the recent FERC
meeting.? Please treat these as confidential and  not for public distribution.
 - 00-02-13 SA Memo on FERC meeting on market power.doc


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data
approver. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012677&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000012677
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/8/01 2:30:03 PM
Requested For       : tom.barkley@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


Hi, I wanted to update you regarding the DG conference to be held in San Diego on November 1-2, 2001, presented by CADER and co-hosted by the DPCA, USCHPA and the AGCC.

The program for the conference has been posted on the CADER website at www.cader.org

If you have not yet registered, please note that the cut-off date for early-bird registration and hotel room rate reservation is September 30th. Please reserve your rooms early to ensure space. Registration forms also can be downloaded from the web site and you can register either on-line or by mailing/faxing the form to the address noted on the form.

Look forward to meeting you at the Conference,

Jairam Gopal
Chair, CADER.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/12/2001 05:21
PM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
02/12/2001 02:36 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Healy/SF/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: PSEG Request

Fred:

Why wouldn't we structure this like the AES Calvert agreement?

Fred Mitro
02/12/2001 01:48 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Healy/SF/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PSEG Request

Kay:

I talked with PSEG this morning.  PSEG would like to negotiate and sign a
binding LOI regarding the Kendall project site in Illinois prior to
negotiating and executing the Definitive SPA.  The specifics of this LOI are:

 PSEG would pay an up-front $300,000 payment to ENA
 This payment would be non-refundable unless PSEG discovered a "fatal flaw"
in the project (we will have to carefully define this concept)
 The binding LOI would establish a date by which the SPA would be executed or
PSEG would forfeit the up-front payment
 The $2.7 MM balance of the Purchase Price would be due upon closing (signing
the SPA and transferring the member interests).

I believe that PSEG is getting nervous that we may close on the Kendall LLC
with another Buyer before they get their act together.

Call me to discuss the timing of drafting such an LOI.  I would like to
strike on PSEG while they are anxious and motivated.  My goal is to send the
LOI to PSEG by Wednesday of this week.  I can work directly with Carolyn if
that is the most efficient approach.

Fred


Jeff:

Here's a draft for your review:

I suggest that the payment terms for the offshore contract require the intial
payment to be made within 7 business days of execution.  That way, we can
sign this up next week.

Kay


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 03/21/2001
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,720
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,504
Total Life to Date Transactions	794,636

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 03/21/01	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,564	76%
Enron Europe Limited	271	46%
Global Markets	227	40%
Enron Metals	657	31%
Enron Industrial Markets	1	2%
Enron Transportation Services	1	3%
Enron Broadband Services	0	0%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	56%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,714,581,177
MTD	37,548,557,936
LTD	477,992,198,847
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,438,822,069

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	35,601,950,485

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	703
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	0
Number of Products Offered Today	1,604
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,412
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,417


Check out the latest issue of eBiz at home.enron.com.  Click on Publications,
then on eBiz and "July 14, 2000."

In this issue:

EnronOnline extends to additional trading platforms
Price caps in the California power market
Weather hedging for wine bars
Enron Directo begins selling power in Spain
The New Power Company acquires customers
LNG transporter brings natural gas to Puerto Rico


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042203.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:   1.92 / Final:   1.89)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 21;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011721.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Below are my responses to your email:

1.  Masters that limit weather trading or contain another trading limitation
in the master only:   per our conversation.
2.  CMS Marketing Services & Trading:  Trading is limited to fixed price
swaps, basis swaps, swing swaps and options.  This limitation is contained in
the Company's Trading Policy, which they have provided to us.   We cannot
trade anything except the types of products listed in the trading policy.
3.  Venezuela:  per Mark's conv. w/Dave Forster, we do not want to pursue the
due diligence on this country at this time.
4.  Phibro, Inc.:    see note #1
5.  Swiss Re:  See my note 11 below.
6.  Tokyo Mitsubishi:  We are preparing amendments that would be added to to
the Online and regular confirmations when they go out to deal with the lack
of legal terms in the master to do anything but interest rate and currency
transactions.  This should solve our problem so we should be able to open
them for trading any commodity.
7.  Trinidad & Tobago:  same comment as #3 above.
8.  UBS AG.  They recently sold their book and got out of the energy
commodity business so we should not be doing anything but FX and interest
rate transactions with them.  Their master is also trading limited, and we
could not trade energy commodities with them without amending it or doing a
fix similar to Tokyo Mitsubishi.
9.  Aspect Resources.  I discussed this one with Mark and Bill, and we have
agreed to open up Aspect for all trading under the Master.
10.  Brant-Allen:  Their Board of Directors limited the trading we did with
them to only the one trade we did under the master.  We cannot do any other
trading with them without specific pre-approval via a new resolution from
their Board of Directors.  So they are still "no" for online derivatives
trading.
11.  Insurance Companies:  With respect to trading with insurance/reinsurance
companies without a master in place, these types of counterparties have
special authority/legal issues that the online trading process does not
address.  When we do trades with this type of counterparty without a master
in place we get legal opinions, guarantees, articles of incorporation &
bylaws and other kinds of statutory documentation to evidence the approval
for this type of counterparties doing these types of transactions.  All kinds
of special representations are also added to the contract based on the type
of counterparty.  We therefore have to continue to say "no" to online trading
based on these special handling procedures.
12.  Cox and Perkins:  We could say "yes" to online derivatives trading,
however, would have to treat them like any other counterparty we did not have
a master in place with.
13.  Kinetic Resources.  Ditto comment 12 above.
14.  Midland Cogeneration.  Still under review as to regulated utility status.
15.  Praixair:  see comment #1 above.
16.  Tembec.  The bylaws of this corporation require that all contracts for
this counterparty must be executed by two officers from a list they provided
to us .  I spoke to Mark about this and they could not trade online unless
their Password Application was signed by two of the officers as directed
above.  Another way to solve this would be to get a special resolution from
Tembec's board of directors allowing only one individual to sign the Password
Application.  Either way, you cannot trade online without meeting these
special signatory requirements.
17.  EW Scripps.  Same comment as #1 above.
18.  Maritime Electric.  Is a Canadian utility.  No Trading.

Critical Changes to my list:

1.  Mexico:  Per our conversation, we are contacting outside counsel to
request legal advice as to whether online transactions are enforceable in
Mexico.  However, we can still not do financial trading without having a
master in place.
2.  Public Service Company of Colorado:  the person that signed the master
appears not to have the authority to sign the master, so until we get this
resolved, we are switching them to a "no".

Per my meeting today with Credit:

I've got 38 we disagree on, either as to whether they're a regulated utility
or an eligible swap participant.  I'll be working on those tomorrow and will
get back to you.

My Review of Your List:

List #1

1.  BP Exploration & Oil Inc.:  Originated from London Credit, missing from
your list.  This is a counterparty that both Houston & London trade with.
ECT has a master in place with them.  Trades would roll under the ECT
Master.  The master is the old ECT Form of master that limits the trading to
energy price swaps and options.  No weather.  Case of Credit override.5
2.  Elf Trading:  Both ECT and ECT International have masters in place and
trade with this counterparty.  Mark was going to talk to Louise about what to
do with these situations when we have more than one master in place.
3.  Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York:  We've got several overlapping
issues I am going to have to talk to London about.  First, here in the U.S.
Morgan got out of the energy commodity business.  We, in fact, "bought their
book".  We actually couldn't "buy their book" because of our low credit
rating relative to Morgan, so all their trades remain in place, 'tho all
payments go in and out through us and we act as servicer for their commodity
business.  Their master with ECT is bad, it only covers energy price swap
(not options!) and does not have the trade option rep which means if we were
to do an option transaction with them we would have to do a fix similar to
the Tokyo Mitsubishi fix.  Saying all that, I don't know what, if any,
trading Morgan continues to do outside the U.S.  I need to talk to London and
find out.  So Morgan right now is a big open issue.
4.  Vitol S.A.:   Both Houston and London trade with this counterparty.
Houston has a master with this counterparty.  Trades should be done under the
master.  The master does not cover weather, so this would be another case of
the Credit override.
5.  Missing counterparties from 1st list:   (1) Wisconsin Electric Power
Company, no master in place, not approved for trading, it is a utility, (2)
Wisconsin Gas Company, no master in place, not approved for trading, it is a
utility, (3) Wisconsin Power and Light Company, we do have a master in place,
approved for all trading, except weather, which is not covered in the master,
would have to be a Credit override, (4) Xeron, Inc., no master in place,
approved for all trading.

List #2

1.  Cabot Oil & Gas:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
2.  Callon Petroleum:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
3.  EIL Petroleum:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
4.  Fortune Energy:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
5.  Plains Resources:  Missed "X" on all weather
6.  PXRE Corp:  deleted final set of weather, good for weather deals only
7.  St. Mary Land & Exploration:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
8.  Stratum Group:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
9.  Tempest Reinsurance:  deleted final set of weather, good for weather
deals only
10.  Twister Gas:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
11.  United Salt:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
12.  West Texas Gas:  Missed "X" on final set of weather

List #3

1.  Bargo Energy:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
2.  Belco Oil & Gas:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
3.  Cross Timbers:  Missed "X" on all weather
4.  Encore Acquisition:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
5.  Norfolk Southern:  You've got them restricted for everything, I've got
them as "OK" for everything
6.  RMS Monte Christo:  Missed "X" on final set of weather
7.  Sapient Energy:  Missed "X" on final set of weather


Kay:

I'd like to hold payment on this invoice until we receive the consent from
GE. Any update?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Walker, Rebecca
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Booth, Chris; Dennis, Tonya; Clark, Catherine; Edmonds, Marcus
Subject: Payment of GE Invoice

Ben

The Turbopark funds request for all payments to be made next month needs to
be submitted by Tuesday, June 12th.  This request covers the period from June
15th to July 15th.  Are we planning to pay the $1.5 MM invoice from GE during
this time period?  If so, I will have accounting request the funds.  If we're
not sure if the payment will be made or not, it is better not to request the
funds.  In this case, the payment can be treated as an "actual" for that
month and backed out of the advance for next month.  Please let me know which
course of action you would like to take.

Thanks,
Rebecca


Pop's just called me.  He's done with his testing and he's going nuts staying
in the Hotel.  He is going home now, and will drive back tomorrow for the
test results.


---------------------- Forwarded by Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron on 05/24/2001
05:38 PM ---------------------------

John Nolan <jwnolan0216@yahoo.com> on 05/24/2001 04:46:35 PM
To: juan.hernandez@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Thank You

Juan - I enjoyed meeting you today.  Please
see the attached.

Regards,

John Nolan

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
 - EnronThankYouJuan.DOC


Here are some thoughts for Enron to share with at the Analyst meeting.
Please let me know if you have any additions, changes, or deletions.  What I
tried to put down were the key facts and positions.  If I've missed anything
let me know.  This is not a great story.

Jim

OUR PHYSICAL POSITION IN CALIFORNIA

EES has electricity customers within the territories of SCE, PG&E, and SDG&E
(about 800 MW of usage) [NOTE - CHECK WITH EES].  EES has natural gas
customers within the territories PG&E and SoCal Gas.

Enron does not have any generation in California (we own a small QF in Nevada
but only have 50 MW excess).

We supply power to the Utilities and to our retail load by buying excess in
California or by transmitting power into the state.  Enron sells natural gas
to the LDCs mainly under spot arrangements.

Enron continues to manage the risk by using traditional hedging tools and by
using the full complement of resources of EES - demand reduction, load
shaping, and efficiency improvements.

Transwestern has long-term capacity arrangements with PG&E.

OUR POLITICAL POSITION IN CALIFORNIA / MESSAGES

The current situation (shortages and potential bankruptcy) is not the result
of competitive markets, rather it is the result of barriers to workable
retail and wholesale markets designed into the California deregulation model
(for instance, the overreliance of the Utilities on the spot market, the
residual CTC calculation, incomplete retail tariff unbundling requiring
direct access customers to pay more than their fair share for the Utilities'
common costs).

Enron does not want to see the California Utilities go bankrupt because those
naysayers of competition will use this situation as an argument against
competition.  Enron disagrees.  What it proves is that not finishing the job
of creating real competition can result in problems.

Enron believes that there are workable short-term and long-term solutions for
California.

In the short-term, (1) California must provide credit enhancement or directly
buy power for the Utilities' needs to ensure a stable supply of electricity,
(2) California should incent customers to institute demand reductions, and
(3) California should raise rates to cover reasonable costs so that the
Utilities do not petition for bankruptcy.

In the long-term, (1) California needs to continue its activities to promote
retail competition (and most importantly it must allow real price signals to
be sent to large customers), (2) California should implement the changes that
the FERC highlighted (end the reliance on the spot market, remove
stakeholders on the Cal ISO Board, give the Utilties the ability to recover
wholesale power costs), (3) California must remove unnecessary barriers to
the development of additional generation capacity, and, most importantly, (4)
California must establish reasonable structures so that the Utilities develop
a balanced portfolio of supplies to better manage electricity market
volatility.

California should not get into the business of owning or operating generation
assets or transmission facilities.

California should not stop moving forward with retail competitition which
allows customers to manage price risk rather than some regulator.

KEY ENRON ISSUES IN CALIFORNIA

We do have outstanding deliveries into the California utilities and would be
an unsecured creditor if bankruptcy occurs. We continue to sell to
creditworthy counterparties in Western Power markets. [NOTE - THE AMOUNT OF
RISK IS AN IR ISSUE THEY WANT TO MANAGE].

The PX Credit (and associated negative CTC) continues to be an issue.  Enron
believes that the rate freeze has not yet ended legally and PG&E's and SCE's
tariff requires the Utilities to pay funds to the customer's agent.  We filed
a Complaint Friday January 19 at the CPUC.  We are confident that these funds
will be recovered.  [NOTE - I DON'T THINK WE WANT TO HIGHLIGHT THIS - AGAIN
AN IR ISSUE BECAUSE OF THE RECEIVABLE]


Sara,
Equity Trading requires an Executing Broker relationship with Simmons &
Company Incorporated.  This relationship is being established for research
and order flow.
Thanks Sheila

Source: Company web site
http://www.simmonsco-intl.com/web/index.asp?thispage=simple
Simmons & Company International is the only investment banking firm
specializing in the energy service industry.
Founded 25 years ago, the firm has acted as financial advisor in more than
$35 billion of energy service transactions,
 including more than $27 billion of mergers and acquisitions. Simmons has
served as co-manager on more than $5.5 billion
in public debt and equity offerings. The firm,s clients range from small,
privately held companies to multi-billion dollar public entities
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 12:35
PM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton on 08/08/2000 12:06 PM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Kelly Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Siimmons & Company International

Sheila:  I just received the package from Simmons.  Will you please send your
request to the usual suspects?  Thanks.

Sam:  Will you please track this agreement on Lotus Notes?  Thanks.


OK gang,

Here is a draft of the memo.  I extended my analysis to try and quantify
limiting conditions for partners on a and x.  The problem is that with my
estimates even using the lower limits the deal will never be profitable for
BF Goodrich.  Please check my math, I know I must have made an error.

Anyway, I hope that we can possibly talk about it at break tomorrow.

Dylan

 - BF Good Memo 0311.doc
 - BF Good Exhibits.xls


see attached


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/25/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,061
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,850
Total Life to Date Transactions	381,754

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 10/25/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,514	64%
Enron Europe Limited	142	34%
Global Products	179	38%
Enron Metals	226	11%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	45%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	1,882,184,716
MTD	35,979,808,700
LTD	204,672,042,972
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	1,964,724,669

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	14,435,993,165

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	535
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	3
Number of Products Offered Today	1,205
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,847
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,604


Just to add:  Evie represents (largely) the oil companies.  She represented
that the suppliers that she represents are negotiating the terms of the
agreement with PG&E. She finished by saying that she was fairly confident
that those negotiations would result in the gas suppliers that she represents
signing PG&E's agreement and supplying gas under those agreements.

Best,
Jeff

	Susan J Mara
	02/06/2001 02:13 PM

		 To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: PG&E Securitization Agreement Statement

Jeff and I heard in a conference call of many parties just now from the large
oil co rep (Evie Elsesser) that:
 "There are several parties willing to sign PG&E's securitization agreement
right now."

	Karen Denne
	02/06/2001 12:12 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: PG&E Securitization Agreement Statement

Statement regarding PG&E's securitization agreement:

Enron does not plan to sign PG&E's securitization agreement at this time for
several reasons.  PG&E has included in the agreement an obligation by
suppliers to negotiate in good faith to provide additional supplies.  This
would potentially expand our exposure to PG&E, and there is no way to
determine that exposure at this time.  PG&E is also asking us to suspend
certain provisions in our existing agreements that allow us to terminate or
suspend service in the event of a bankruptcy or failure to pay debts.  This
limits our flexibility to deal with our different exposures to PG&E.  We are
continuing to perform on our existing contracts with PG&E.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:46 PM
To:	Gaskill, Chris; Lavorato, John; Thomas, Martin; Neal, Scott; Grigsby, Mike; Shively, Hunter S.; Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John
Subject:	FW: AGA's Weekly Storage Report -- FYI
Importance:	High

I thought you might be interested!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bieniawski, Paul
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:29 PM
To:	Mrha, Jean; Gaskill, Chris; Gomez, Julie A.; Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	FW: AGA's Weekly Storage Report -- FYI
Importance:	High

Here is a response from AGA to the Underground Storage Committee regarding the very low injection number reported two weeks ago.

I served on the AGA-USC when the report debuted and would be happy to share the USC's view should any of you be interested.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Garry D.
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:21 PM
To:	Bieniawski, Paul
Subject:	FW: AGA's Weekly Storage Report -- FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Denbow, Kimberly" <KDenbow@aga.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Denbow+2C+20Kimberly+22+20+3CKDenbow+40aga+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:04 AM
To:	Goforth, Alex; Anton, Amanda; Theodos, Andrew F.; Stinson, Charles E.; Busch, David; Nightingale, David; Bender, Dennis J.; Matheson, Donald K.; Ostrovich, Edward; Metzger, Fred; Hill, G. Scott; Wilson, Garry D.; Keen, Gerald S.; Kelly, Glen; Royce, Gordon L.; Gettman, Greg; Welch, Greg; Theirl, Gregory; McCracken, Harold; Riley, Horace; Gatewood, Jack; Blasingame, James; Philo, James; Carlson, Jeff; Mohn, Jeryl L.; Chan, Joe; Wickens, John; Shelton, John D.; Deters, Joseph; Marusic, Joe; Benson, Karen G.; Sole, Karol A.; Keppel, Keith; Denbow, Kimberly; Lowe, Mark A.; Gredell, Mark; Fraser, Michael; Morley, Michael; Callahan, Patrick E.; Englehart, R. Alan; Harris, Ramon; Frear, Ray; Beard, Robert; Glosier, Robert A.; Nowaczewski, Stephen; Foh, Stephen; Bergin, Stephen R.; Jacobs, Stephen (Steve) R.; Kline, Steven L.; Symon, Terry; Kronas, Theodore; Puracchio, Thomas; Steinbauer, Thomas; Uding, William
Cc:	McGill, Chris; Traweek, Lori
Subject:	AGA's Weekly Storage Report -- FYI

Hello, everyone! I hope that you had a fine holiday weekend! Mine was
great!!

Several committee members have expressed an interest in learning more
about the events that lead to and resulted from the unexpected working
gas storage number reported a few weeks ago in the AGA American Gas
Storage Survey. At the committee's request, the following is a brief
message from Chris McGill, managing director of policy analysis,
regarding this activity. Please review the material below and attached.
By the end of this week or early next week, I will forward to you the
summary referenced in the final paragraph below for your comments and/or
concerns. Thank you. Have an awesome day!

-----Original Message-----
From: McGill, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:23 AM
To: Denbow, Kimberly
Cc: Wilkinson, Paul; Shin, David; Pierson, Paul
Subject:

To: AGA Underground Storage Committee Members:

Thank you for the opportunity to provide an update on the recent
activities of AGA's American Gas Storage Survey (AGSS). Certainly, the
voluntary survey and resulting estimates of working gas in storage for
the nation would not be possible without your help and support. There
are three issues I would like to cover in this message, including the
recent revision of working gas, an issue of continuing the reporting and
current procedures and methods.

Regarding the recent report and subsequent revision of working gas in
storage for the Consuming Region East, please know that we continue to
follow our procedures for data collection, verification and
distribution. Several weeks ago, we flagged several survey submittals
that seemed different from traditional patterns in the eastern region
for this time of year. Follow-up to the submittals was set in motion,
however, were not fully resolved until days after the Wednesday posting
period. It is our policy to consider eliminating certain data
submittals, if questions arise about the validity of the data. In this
case, inclusion of the data or elimination of the data from the
computational spreadsheets did not change the fact that a very low net
build would be reported for the nation. Because of that we opted to go
forward with our estimates and continue to pursue our verification
efforts. Simply put, we don't make up numbers for companies when we have
an actual report in hand just to create a final estimate of working gas
changes that fits more closely with market expectations. What turned out
to be a clerical error in the data reported to us was discovered and a
revised survey submitted. Our revision of the estimates of working gas
in storage for the eastern region and the total US came one week later
at our normal reporting period, as is our stated policy for distributing
revisions to the public.

The fact is that we have revised our data about 25 times in the past 7.5
years (or about 400 weekly reports). Our accuracy can be clearly
documented by comparing the AGSS estimates to that of EIA. The attached
slides do just that, as well as show the current level of working gas
compared to the prior five-year average. What seems to have developed in
the natural gas market, particularly among traders, is a lack of
tolerance between what we report and what the market expects. In order
to continue our reach for consistency, we are reviewing our methods and
procedures to ensure that they continue to reflect the best practices of
completing a report such as the weekly estimates of working gas. Our
evolving methods and procedures issue brief is attached. Any comments
you have on the stated procedures or regarding this memorandum, in
general, can be directed to me.

Finally, the issue of whether we continue to report the estimates of
working gas publicly remains one to be considered by the AGA Board of
Directors. Like all projects at AGA, the AGSS come under periodic
scrutiny for its value to the members and to the gas market in general.
However, like many real-time information sources, the sequential data
set has become sensitive over time. Please be alerted to the fact that a
summary is being prepared by AGA for presentation to board members on
this issue. It is our intention to copy the Underground Storage
Committee on the documentation that is distributed. It seems likely that
if AGA discontinues the weekly reporting of working gas that some other
entity (federal or otherwise) will pick it up. Again, if you have
comments on this memorandum, the attachments to this memo or the AGSS
summary to be presented to the AGA Board (not attached but expected to
be copied to you soon) please make them to me or to the appropriate
person at your company.

I appreciate your attention to this matter. Your support of the American
Gas Storage Survey is gratefully acknowledged.

Christopher B. McGill
Manager Director, Policy Analysis

American Gas Association
400 N. Capitol St. NW, 4th Floor
Washington DC 20001

Tel: 202-824-7132
Fax: 202-824-7087
 <http://www.aga.org/> http://www.aga.org

 - Current Storage.ppt
 - IB2001StorageProcedures.doc


sorry, i left lou off of the message.
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/13/2001
09:46 AM ---------------------------

Drew Fossum
01/13/2001 09:45 AM
To: Norma Hasenjager/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Request to purchase chair(s) for Susan

Lou, do we have any sort of policy on requests like this?  Lee Huber made the
same request last year and we gave her the chair (she only wanted one,
however).  Norma, any thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/13/2001
09:43 AM ---------------------------

DENISE LAGESSE
01/12/2001 01:14 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Request to purchase chair(s) for Susan

Susan Scott would like authorization to order an Aeron chair for each of her
offices - on 47 and 41.  This particular chair is designed to help with back
problems, which she has.  Many people at Enron already have this type of
chair, but we rarely, if ever, have a surplus because they are so popular.
The cost is $567.77 per chair plus tax.  Please approve the purchase of two.
Thanks!


For June 2000, please schedule the volumes on the FT contract .5618 to the
FTR .6942 as follows:

FT   Z1 surplus 879 to FTR  Z3 shortage
FT   Z2 surplus 45,206 to FTR Z3 shortage
FT   Z3 surplus 2,333 to FTR Z3 shortage

If you have any questions, please call me at 713-853-1755.
Thanks,
Judy


I normally wouldn't forward these messages but this is funny!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 09:20
AM ---------------------------

"CAVALIER,DEBORAH MD" <LAB-DSC@womans.com> on 12/21/99 08:55:00 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Funny!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: GILLY,KATHY J
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 8:48 AM
> To: CAVALIER,DEBORAH MD
> Subject: FW: Funny!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kbgilly [SMTP:kbgilly@prodigy.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 10:11 PM
> To: B. Gilly (work); lab-kjb@womans.com; rmusso20@aol.com;
> nokito1@aol.com
> Subject: Fw: Funny!
>
>  <<Christ7.exe>>

 - Christ7.exe


My  rsvp for August luncheon.

Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


This is to confirm that Houston Pipe Line will pay the  Aquila Storage and
Transportation .16/mmbtu for 50,000mmbtu's.  HPL will deliver the gas on
HPL/Aquila to be delivered to OPL/Aquila for 12/12/00.  Thanks.  EMV


Gordon,

It was a  pleasure talking to you.
I shall ask my assistant to send you the reprint.

Vince Kaminski

Shirley, Can you, please, send a copy of the paper on credit risk management
(reprint from the  RISK book).

Gordon Rausser <rausser@nature.berkeley.edu> on 04/26/2000 12:02:02 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject:

Vince:

Thank you very much for the useful information you provided me today.

As you suggested, I wish to request a copy of the reprint that was
published last year in Risk.

Gordon Rausser
Robert Gordon Sproul Distinguished Professor
Dean, College of Natural Resources
University of California
101 Giannini Hall, MC 3100
Berkeley, CA 94720
Phone: 510-642-7171
Fax: 510-642-4612

>http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/index.php3?db=dean_rausser


Juan,

home 248-366-3043
cell 248-766-0946
work 800-255-6116, ext. 4263

Laura

>>> <Juan.Hernandez@enron.com> 09/07/01 02:13PM  >>>
LAURA SEND ME YOUR HOME NUMBER, CELL NUMBER AND PAGER  AGAIN.  I'LL CALL YOU
TONIGHT.  MOM IS FLYING IN  TONIGHT
    -----Original Message-----
    From:   "Laura Hernandez"  <Laura.Hernandez@trw.com>@ENRON
              mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Laura+20Hernandez+22+20+3CLaura+2EHernandez+40trw+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
    Sent:   Friday, September 07, 2001 7:29 AM
    To:     spdhdz@aol.com;  sandra.hernandez@crescentcom.com;
              mslucyroman@earthlink.net; Hernandez,  Juan;
              Maria.Hernandez@lbb.state.tx.us; mroscarhernandez@yahoo.com
    Subject:  Hernandez Update
    Everyone,
   There has been a major shakeup at TRW.  I  have always  worked for TRW
   Automotive Electronics.   Well, we just got told that we TRW  AE has been
   dissolved  and no longer exists.  I support the Safety  & Security,  along
   with some Body Control plants.  Well, now I am   supposed to be going to
   the division known as Occupant Safety  Systems (Airbags  & Seatbelts).  I
   am not sure  what is going to  happen........
    Laura
**********************************************************************
This  e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may  contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended  recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly  prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for  the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at  enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message.  This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an  acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract  between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any  other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by  estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


FYI.  We'll keep what we have here in electronic form and hardcopy.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Denver
Sent:	05 November 2001 09:46
To:	Scrimshaw, Matthew
Cc:	Edison, Andrew; Bramwell, James
Subject:	FW: European email and data retention policies in relation to EBS litigation

Matthew,

Attached below is an update I sent to Paul Freeman regarding EBS data retention.
The most important point to make in relation to the current litigation is that we can only provide data backups as far back as March/April 2001 and email backups as far back as 2001,
EBS systems were administered by the EBS US IT team prior to these dates.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards
Denver Scott
European IT Operations
Direct Tel: 	+44 (0) 207 783 7667
Fax: 	+44 (0) 207 783 8813
Mobile: 	+44 (0) 7768 735 804
Email: 	denver.scott@enron.com

EBS in Europe
Prior to March 2001 EBS Europe had a independent infrastructure that was located in EH but administered out of the US by Scott Abshire and team.
The European IT team had no access to the EBS environment and as such were unable to backup the data.

During March 2001 all EH based EBS users were migrated to the CORP domain but retained access to their US based Notes email system.
At this time, all data files located on the EBS data server were migrated to the European S: drive, all user data was migrated to their respective H: drives.
The users continued to use their US based email system.

From the start of July, 2001 these EBS users were then migrated from the US based EBS email system to our Exchange system.

Implications for EBS litigation:
European IT Ops can only provide backups of the user data from March/April 2001 and email data from August 2001
Backups from prior to these dates would be held in the US (if they exist)

All continuing EBS employees and employees who have been redeployed from EBS to other Enron business units have had their mailbox size restrictions removed (to prevent any loss of email data relevant to litigation)


Legal/Commercial:

Here is my suggestion for the PJM Index. I will use a PJM Peak Loadshape that
mirrors the ISO NE and ISO NY Loadshape.

Kenny; et al:

Please map in TEST and PROD

Index:  PJM Interconnection
Abb:  PJM InterC
Sort Code:
Desc:  The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average
of the hourly prices listed in the Index (in final, not estimate, form) for
electricity delivered during Peak hours on each Delivery Day during the
applicable Determination Period.  The Floating Price for each Determination
Period shall be calculated utilizing the hourly clearing prices published by
PJM Interconnection, LLC on its official web site currently located at
http://www.pjm.com/pub/account/lmp/index.html, or any successor thereto,
under the heading "PJM - Locational Marginal Pricing Files"  (the "Index").

Dale
3-9746

Eric Saibi@ENRON
06/13/2000 12:13 PM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PJM Prices

The appropriate address is ftp://www.pjm.com/pub/account/lmp/index.html

This is the same as going to www.pjm.com, clicking on "Market & System Data",
and then clicking on "Daily Real Time LMP Data".


We have a call set up with the PwC auditors for Friday September 7 at 10:30 a.m.  The call-in number is (877) 661-1222 and the passcode number is 921065.

Richard, Mark, and Sue:  Any suggestions for increasing the likelihood that the auditors will pursue our questions?  I was thinking that we could get the names of the auditors and send them a confirming letter thanking them for meeting with us, reiterating our questions and concerns, and stating that we look forward to and relying on their review of these critical matters because so much money is at stake.  PwC will be less likely to blow us off with a letter like that in the file---if the ISO blows up, that letter would be Exhibit A in a negligent misrepresentation case against PwC.

Alan,

Would you like to meet on Thursday afternoon for a bit to outline and frame our questions?

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Shapiro, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:02 PM
To: Comnes, Alan; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Mara, Susan; Palmer, Mark A.
(PR)
Subject: RE: PwC Operational Study: A golden opportunity to expose ISO
manipulation of real-time markets and scheduling

Go for it!

-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:53 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Mara, Susan; Palmer, Mark
A. (PR)
Subject: RE: PwC Operational Study: A golden opportunity to expose ISO
manipulation of real-time markets and scheduling
Importance: High

Rick,

I talked with Sue and Steve and also talked to Karen Shea with Dynegy (formerly with PG&E).

PWC has showed little spine in the past.  The tariffs are usually vague enough for PWC to find to-the-letter compliance  where clear violations in spirit exist.  Also, issues raised over 2 years ago have yet to be resolved.

However, Sue and I agree that there would be no harm to lodge some issues with PWC.  I think the issues we should raise are:
CAISO has still not brought forth a creditworthy buyer (Terry Winter's letter said as much)
CAISO appears to be taking OOM calls in violation of its tariff as a way to launder DWR power.

I told Steve to go ahead and schedule a call with PWC and I offered to be on it with him.  Rick or Mark: please let me know if you have a problem pursuing this.

Finally, FYI, Dynegy expects to lodge issues with PWC.

Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: Shapiro, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 7:23 PM
To: Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan; Palmer, Mark A.
(PR)
Subject: RE: PwC Operational Study: A golden opportunity to expose ISO
manipulation of real-time markets and scheduling

By this e-mail, I'm soliciting input from Sue and Alan on whether we should engage with PWC( I know  Sue thinks PWC is captive to ISO).Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent:	Tue 9/4/2001 5:31 PM
To:	Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard
Cc:
Subject:	PwC Operational Study:  A golden opportunity to expose ISO manipulation of real-time markets and scheduling

PriceWaterhouse is seeking confidential input from ISO market participants about the ISO's hour-ahead, day-ahead and real-time operating practices performed by ISO personnel in its Folsom and Alhambra control rooms.  This would be a great opportunity to bring up dubious schedule adjustments, CDWR sweetheart deals (OOM purchases), CDWR access to ISO confidential data, suspected manipulation of ex post prices, and ISO board independence.

However, we need to act fast.  Meetings with PwC are scheduled for tomorrow and Friday.  If there is interest in presenting some questions/data to PwC, I would be available to help pull together information and formulate questions on short notice.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: CRCommunications [mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:32 PM
To: ISO Market Participants
Subject: CAISO Notice - PwC Operational Study

The ISO is re-sending this message, previously sent on August 29, due to
technical difficulties.  If you received the original message, please
disregard this one.
ISO Market Participants:
In past years, the California Independent System Operator (ISO) has
evaluated its operating practices through an independent review.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) plans to commence the ISO's 2001 Operational
Study during September 2001. As in past years, the Operational Study will be
focused on hour-ahead, day-ahead and real-time operating practices performed
by ISO personnel in its Folsom and Alhambra control rooms.
PwC is seeking input from ISO market participants prior to conducting its
Operational Study. Consistent with prior studies, the scope of the 2001
Operational Study will not include active settlement disputes which are
being addressed in other forums.
If you would like to meet with PwC (via conference call) to discuss the
scope of this Operational Study, please call Ms. Ericia Berti at (916)
351-4453 or e-mail her at eberti@caiso.com <mailto:eberti@caiso.com> .  You
can schedule a meeting for Wednesday, September 5th or  Friday, September
7th.  Market participants will be given the opportunity to have a member of
ISO Operations management, Vicken Kasarjian, present during all or a portion
of their meetings if they so desire.  Information conveyed by market
participants to PwC during these meetings will be treated in the strictest
confidence at the request of the market participants.
When scheduling a meeting, please advise Ms. Berti whether you prefer to:
1.	Meet with PwC only;
2.	Meet with PwC and Vicken Kasarjian; or
3.	Meet first with PwC only, followed by a session including Vicken
Kasarjian to cover certain matters addressed in the first meeting that you
wish to communicate directly to ISO management.
If you have any questions regarding the PwC Operational Study or the
interviews, please contact Ericia Berti.
Client Relations Communications
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>

Byron B. Woertz, Jr.
Director, Client Relations
Phone:  (916) 608-7066
Pager:   (800) 481-7037


It is coming up on that time again.  The most glorious time of year.  The
time of the year when life begins anew.  No, not spring, FOOTBALL SEASON!

That being said, it is time to start thinking about fantasy football again.

I need to know who of you is interested in playing again, and any suggestions
on rule changes (i.e. scoring, fees, etc.). I was thinking about having the
draft in late August.

Let me know if you have any friends that you think might want to play.

-Eric


You are not going to believe this.  I have yet another change!  Pursuant to
recent changes by the United States General Services Administration, the
standard language we currently use in the Utilization of Business Concerns
requires updating.  The new language is provided in red in the attached file
below.  Could you please update the provision in our contract to reflect the
new language?  I guess it's good that it happened at this time.  Otherwise,
I would have had to issue an amendment.  Thanks ...

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 2:50 PM
To: CWPfister@cps-satx.com
Subject: Re: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS

Christian,
     I have made the change to Section 8.8 as requested in the attached
contract document.  You are correct about the second item, it is intended
that the Purchase Order Number be a part of the address to be included on
any invoice that is issued to the company.  This is absolutely the only way
that we have to include the Purchase Order Number on any statements.
Therefore, i have not removed that line from the address,  At such time as
the Purchase Order Number is available, please send a revised address
notice to the company containing such number.  Until that happens, it will
be understood that no number has been provided.  Please call if you have
any questions.

(See attached file: 2001-001ctr.doc)

                    "Pfister,

                    Christian W."         To:     "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"

                    <CWPfister@cps        <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>

                    -satx.com>            cc:

                                          Subject:     FW: Enfolio Contract
with CPS
                    01/23/2001

                    10:43 AM

Mr. Hyvl,

I just now had a chance to make a final review of the contract and noticed
a
couple of items:

1.  Section 8.8. Confidentiality (page 5)

"and wire instructions" was inserted in the wrong place.  Could you change
it to read:  "The provisions of the Agreement, other than the terms of any
Transaction and wire instructions, are not subject to this confidentiality
obligation."

2.  Exhibit "A"  Customer Invoices

Under the address for CPS invoices, you inserted "Purchase Order Number
_________."  Since we do not know at this time what the purchase order
number will be, could we delete this.  Otherwise, it looks as if the
purchase order number is supposed to be part of the address.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (210)353-3725.
Thanks ...

 - UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000
05:28 PM ---------------------------

"NW Security and Bug Patch Alert" <Security-BugPatch@bdcimail.com> on
08/21/2000 05:12:07 PM
Please respond to "Security and Bug Patch Alert Help" <NWReplies@bellevue.com>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: New Love Letter variant

NETWORK WORLD FUSION FOCUS: JASON MESERVE on
SECURITY AND BUG PATCH ALERT
TODAY'S FOCUS: New Love Letter variant
08/21/00

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This newsletter sponsored by
Finjan Software ~~~~~~~~~~~~

YES, THERE ARE ALTERNATIVES TO REACTIVE ANTI-VIRUS TECHNOLOGY
Finjan Software offers proactive security solutions using real-time
behavior monitoring technology to block malicious code WITHOUT relying
on database updates. Get proactive protection for VB Script,.exe
Trojans and worms like ILOVEYOU, ExploreZip and LifeStages. Why rely on
security products that offer updates AFTER you've been hit when you can
block first-strike attacks before damage occurs? Find out more, and
download Finjan's personal security freeware, at:
http://nww1.com/go/1643930a.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

11 FREE Newsletter Additions from Network World!
Sign up Today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/foc35
Wireless in the Enterprise, Servers, Optical Networking,
The Network Channel, The Edge, Net Worker, Convergence,
Free Stuff, Mobile Computing, The Network World 200, and
Technology Executive
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Today's Focus: New Love Letter variant
---------------------------------------------------------------
By Jason Meserve

Here we go yet again.

The antivirus vendors are all sending out alerts warning their
customers of a new strain of the infamous Love Letter virus that struck
last May. This version comes with the subject line of "resume" and
contains an attachment called "resume.txt.vbs".

The file contains a fake resume, though reports vary on whether it is a
German or a Swiss engineer that is profiled. Makes no difference - the
file infects the host computer and then attempts to send itself to
everyone in the local Outlook address book.

It seems as if the virus is targeted at customers of the United Bank of
Switzerland. The new strain attempts to steal UBS account information
off the infected computer. UBS claims that the virus threatens few
people and that most customer data is secure.

For U.S. users, the problem could be more clogged e-mail pipes. But
hopefully, the general user population is now trained to be wary of any
attachment, especially those ending in .vbs. Most of the antivirus
vendors are updating their virus definition files, and protection
should be available shortly, if not already. For more:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2000/0817swissbug.html

Before we get on to today's alerts and patches, I'd like to mention
some upcoming coverage in Network World. A few weeks back I mentioned a
company in London offering "hacker insurance."  A couple of you wrote
in looking for more information. Unfortunately, I do not have the space
to cover such issues here.

Not to fret. Mich Kabay, author of Network World's Security newsletter,
plans to take up the topic in an upcoming edition. Mich has some great
tips for keeping your company network equipment secure, so check out his
newsletter at:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/sec/

Also, the features department here at Network World is working on a
feature on the subject of hacker insurance, and they are looking for
help. If you've got something to share, check out our forum:
http://www.nwfusion.com/cgi-bin/WebX.cgi?230@@.ee6f1b5

If you're looking for more information, stay tuned to Network World and
Mich's newsletter.

Now on with the latest patches and alerts:

Guninski finds another IE and Windows problem

Famed Microsoft bug hunter Georgi Guninski has found problems in
Internet Explorer 5.5 and Windows 98 that could allow outside users to
take control of the affected system. Both problems revolve around the
Shell DefView ActiveX control. The issue has been confirmed by
independent sources, according to news reports. For more information:
http://www.nat.bg/~joro/ieshelldefview.html
**********

SGI fixes problem with Linux kernel

SGI has released a patch for its ProPack for Linux, which ships with a
modified Linux kernel. A problem in the kernel could allow a local user
on an affected machine to gain root access. For fix information:
http://www.linux.org.uk/VERSION/relnotes.2216.html
**********

Microsoft releases patch for "Specialized Header" vulnerability

A problem in the Windows 2000 version of Microsoft's Internet
Information Server could allow a remote user to view sensitive file
information. The problem can be exploited using a specially formatted
request header. For more information on the problem and to download the
patch:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/fq00-058.asp
**********

OS/2 Warp 4.5 FTP vulnerability

For those still running the OS/2 Warp operating system, security
consultancy Vigilante has discovered a vulnerability in the system,s
FTP server. The vulnerability could be used to crash the server. IBM
has released a patch for the problem:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/ps/products/tcpip/fixes/v4.3os2/ic27721/
**********

FreeBSD fixes range of problems:

Zope: The open-source Web application server contains a vulnerability
that could allow DHTML files to be changed remotely. Patches are
available from:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-3-stable/www/zope-2.2.0.
tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/www/zope-2.2.0.
tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/alpha/packages-4-stable/www/zope-2.2.0
.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-current/www/zope-2.2.0
.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/alpha/packages-5-current/www/zope-2.2.
0.tgz

Dhclient: The DHCP client for Linux can be tricked by a rogue DHCP
server into executing arbitrary commands. For patches:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-3-stable/net/isc-dhcp3-3
.0.b1.17.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/net/isc-dhcp3-3
.0.b1.17.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/alpha/packages-4-stable/net/isc-dhcp3-
3.0.b1.17.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-current/net/isc-dhcp3-
3.0.b1.17.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/alpha/packages-5-current/net/isc-dhcp3
-3.0.b1.17.tgz

Proftpd: The FTP server could allow both named and anonymous FTP users
to execute arbitrary commands on the server as root. For patches:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-3-stable/ftp/proftpd-1.2
.0rc2.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/ftp/proftpd-1.2
.0rc2.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/alpha/packages-4-stable/ftp/proftpd-1.
2.0rc2.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-current/ftp/proftpd-1.
2.0rc2.tgz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/alpha/packages-5-current/ftp/proftpd-1
.2.0rc2.tgz

Ntop: This program is used for monitoring network usage. However, it
can be susceptible to buffer overflow attacks, which can be used to
execute arbitrary commands on the affected server. For patches:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-3-stable/net/ntop-1.1.tg
z
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/net/ntop-1.1.tg
z
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/alpha/packages-4-stable/net/ntop-1.1.t
gz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-current/net/ntop-1.1.t
gz
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/alpha/packages-5-current/net/ntop-1.1.
tgz
**********

Red Hat fixes gpm module problems

Red Hat Linux last week announced it has fixed two potential problems
in the gpm module that ships with Version 5.2 and 6.x of the
open-source operating system. The problems could let a local user
launch a denial-of-service attack or execute arbitrary commands using
elevated privilege. For more information:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11607
**********

Trustix urges users to upgrade Linux mail and perl packages

Two vulnerabilities in mail and perl packages that can be exploited
together to give a user root access have been patched in Trustix's
Secure Linux. The company is urging customers to upgrade as soon as
possible. For source files:
ftp://ftp.trustix.com/pub/Trustix/updates/1.1/SRPMS/mailx-8.1.1-16.src.rpm
ftp://ftp.trustix.com/pub/Trustix/updates/1.1/SRPMS/perl-5.00503-10tr.src.rpm
**********

Today's list of virus alerts:

W32/Sysid - This e-mail worm comes with no subject and could have up to
99 different filenames. The virus infects a number of system files and
attempts to e-mail itself to users listed in an Outlook address book.
(Sophos, Computer Associates)

WM97/Doeii-A - The Word macro virus displays a message, changes a
document's content and adds a password to the document. (Sophos)

W32/Bugfix and VBS/Bugfix - This virus shows up in an inbox claiming to
be a Windows bugfix with an attachment called "bugfix.exe." When the
file is opened it infects all files in the Windows directory and
attempts to send itself to all users listed in an Outlook address book.
(Sophos, Computer Associates)

WM97/Vmpck1-DV - Word macro virus attempts to change the label of the
infected computer's C: drive to "suca." It also tries to replace all
references to "il" in a Word document to "il cazzo duro." (Sophos)

WM97/Marker-FF - Another Word macro virus that tries to change a
document's author information to "Ethan Frome." (Sophos)

WM97/Marker-C - This Word macro virus takes the infected file's summary
information and transmits it to the Codebreaker's Web site. (Sophos)

WM97/Tpro-A - A lame Word macro virus that comes without a payload.
(Sophos)
**********

Miss an issue?

Just point your browser at the following link and you'll be caught up on
all your summer reading in no time:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/bug/

To contact Jason Meserve:
-------------------------
Jason Meserve is a staff writer with Network World, covering search
engines, portals, videoconferencing, IP Multicast and document
management. He also oversees the "Security Alerts" page on Fusion
(http://www2.nwfusion.com/security/bulletins.html). Jason can be
reached at mailto:jmeserve@nww.com.
-------------------------

Got a security alert or bug patch question related to your
corporate network? Post it at Experts Exchange on Fusion at
http://nwfusion.experts-exchange.com/. Another network
professional may have the solution to your problem.

May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered at your
fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by receiving 51 FREE
issues to our print publication. Apply today at
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl

*********************************************************
Subscription Services

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail newsletters,
go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To change your email address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to this
message.

Other Questions/Comments

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor, at:
mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Account Executive,
at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Network World Fusion is part of IDG.net, the IDG Online Network.
IT All Starts Here:
http://www.idg.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2000


---------------------- Forwarded by Kathryn Sheppard/PDX/ECT on 03/19/2001
10:38 AM ---------------------------

Cynthia Biggs <cynthia.biggs@travelpark.com> on 03/16/2001 02:41:48 PM
To: "'kathryn.sheppard@enron.com'" <kathryn.sheppard@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: revised itinerary for mark guzman 25mar tvl

                                          AGENT CB/CB BOOKING REF YY4TAT

                                          GUZMAN/MARK
                                          ENRON NORTH AMERICA
                                          3WTC 0306
  ENRON CORP                              KATHRYN SHEPPARD 464-7698
                                          INTEROFFICE ETKT RCPT

  DATE:  MAR 16 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

AMERICA WEST AIRLINES 25MAR PORTLAND OR    PHOENIX AZ     512P    843P
HP 225     W          SUN   INTERNATIONAL  SKY HARBOR INT
                                           TERMINAL 4
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:31 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
            SEAT ASSIGNMENT IS RESTRICTED TO AIRPRT CKIN ONLY

AMERICA WEST AIRLINES 25MAR PHOENIX AZ     EL PASO TX     920P    1028P
HP 429     W          SUN   SKY HARBOR INT INTERNATIONAL
                            TERMINAL 4
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:08 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-200/200 ADVANCED
            SEAT ASSIGNMENT IS RESTRICTED TO AIRPRT CKIN ONLY

HOTEL                 25MAR CAMINO REAL HOTEL-EL PASO
                      27MAR 101 S. EL PASO STREET
                            EL PASO, TX 79901
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 915-534-3000
                            FAX: 915-534-3024
                            CONFIRMATION: 83670404
                            REFERENCE: A04A15
                            SINGLE ROOM KING SIZE BED
                            RATE: PRO USD 99.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ENRON CORP NON SMKNG KING
             TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL BY 4PM DAY OF ARRIVAL.

AMERICA WEST AIRLINES 27MAR EL PASO TX     PHOENIX AZ     303P    421P
HP 623     W          TUE   INTERNATIONAL  SKY HARBOR INT
                                           TERMINAL 4
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:18 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-200/200 ADVANCED
                            SEAT 12F NO SMOKING CONFIRMED GUZMAN/MARK(IDS

AMERICA WEST AIRLINES 27MAR PHOENIX AZ     PORTLAND OR    506P    651P
HP 792     W          TUE   SKY HARBOR INT INTERNATIONAL
                            TERMINAL 4
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:45 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300
                            SEAT 06B NO SMOKING CONFIRMED GUZMAN/MARK(IDS
                         ONLY MIDDLE SEAT AVAIL

MISCELLANEOUS         26JUL HOUSTON TX
                      THU   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  HP/NHX0IH

GUZMAN/MARK  S0C0413R1063                TICKET:HP/ETKT 401 7025970488

*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
THIS IS A NON-REFUNDABLE FARE THAT REQUIRES
TRAVEL ON THESE SPECIFIC DATES AND FLIGHTS.
ANY CHANGES WILL RESULT IN A PENALTY AND/OR
ADDITIONAL COLLECTION.
FARES CHANGE FREQUENTLY. WE WILL HAPPILY RE-EVALUATE
YOUR FARE UPON REQUEST.
****************************************************
THIS IS THE PASSENGER RECEIPT FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC TICKET.
PLEASE CHECK-IN WITH PHOTO IDENTIFICATION AND WITH
EITHER (1) THIS RECEIPT OR (2) YOUR CONFIRMATION NUMBER.
YOUR ETKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: NHX0IH
*****************************************************
TICKET PRICE IS 410.59 ROUNDTRIP NONREFUNDABLE
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED


Mark,
Back In January approximately Visualpro was updated a new file was created
called old errstat.db we also have about 20 turbines off-line at Trent Mesa
due to leaning towers. It could be that it has been off-line since the
update. I am also attaching a updated channel list for Visualpro High speed
running number is still not explained to my satisfaction but, it is
definitely not Tip Speed the numbers are to small. Let me know if their is
any further clarification you would like on this list.

Regards,
Paul Landers

Mark Fisher
04/08/2002 12:51 PM
To: Paul Landers/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: WR527 Pitch System Faults

Paul,

Here is the formatted pitch system fault information you requested for the
Trent site. I have several comments.
(1) The data came from the March 20 Trent data download.
(2) 6 turbines did not have the ErrStat file included in the download. These
are denoted by blank cells in the fault columns in the attached spreadsheet.
(3) While looking through the data, I noticed that there was at least one
ErrStat file that was downloaded and showed no recorded status messages. I
checked the corresponding ErrDev file and there were status messages being
recorded there. I have sent this information to Germany to see if there is an
explanation.
(4) Turbine 99 is represented in SCADA at Trent by 199.

If you have any questions let me know. I will probably do one of the other
smaller sites before checking into tackling Clear Sky.

Mark Fisher


I spoke with Ken about the Business Council.  He agreed: errors of commission
are much better than errors of omission.  H e does want to be personally
involved in the invitations from here on and he is very willing to make calls
next week to help get some confirmations.  Deal directly with him . . .
there's no need for me to be in the middle.  Also, a bit of background:
Greenspan is always invited to the reception the night before, but they don't
want to offer him a speaking spot because he won't speak without the press
present.

Thanks again for all your work on the Senate hearing.  I felt overprepared --
which is just how I want to feel -- and every bit of information I needed was
at my fingertips.


I'll report back to you this afternoon.

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: RE: Clarification

Figured you did, but better to be safe than sorry!


SF Chron, 7/4: Federal price limits backfire
Sac Bee, 7/3: Out-of-state generators pull plug over uncertainty on price
controls
LA Times, 7/3:  Power sales halted by new pricing curbs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
Federal price limits backfire
Some generators withhold power rather than abide by rate caps
David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 4, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/07/04/M
N186091.DTL
Officials in California and Nevada, after months of lobbying for federal
regulators to cap Western power prices, warned yesterday that the newly
imposed limits have had the unintended consequence of increasing a threat of
blackouts in the two states.
The warnings were issued as California came within minutes of rolling
blackouts yesterday afternoon, and one day after the first-ever rolling
blackouts in Las Vegas forced energy-hungry casinos to shut off fountains and
reduce air conditioning.
The two states are asking the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to take a
closer look at the so-called price mitigation plan and come up with revisions
that would deter power companies from withholding electricity during
shortages.
"We need some clarity to this order," said Oscar Hidalgo, a spokesman for the
California Department of Water Resources, which is spending billions of
dollars to keep the state's lights on.
"Generators need to be held accountable," he said.
The crux of the problem is that price limits kick in during shortages, yet
power companies say these caps force them to sell power at below-market rates
during periods of high demand.
Some companies have responded by holding back power rather than face the
expense of shipping electricity from state to state. Each mile that
electricity must be transmitted adds to the overall cost.
"No one's going to pay for transmission if the cost is near the caps," said
Gary Ackerman, executive director of the Western Power Trading Forum, an
energy-industry association in Menlo Park.
Ackerman said several companies in his organization decided that there was no
economic advantage to offering power in regional markets when price controls
are in effect.
"This means individual regions like California or Las Vegas could end up not
having enough," Ackerman said. "It increases the threat of blackouts."
BLACKOUT ALERT CANCELED
California authorities issued a blackout alert at 1:45 p.m. yesterday when
power reserves dipped to dangerously low levels. They canceled the alert
about an hour later, after finding additional supplies.
"Everyone in the West is fighting for megawatts," said Stephanie McCorkle, a
spokeswoman for the California Independent System Operator, which oversees
the state's power network.
The Golden State's latest brush with lights-out conditions came a day after
Nevada experienced its own rolling blackouts for the first time, prompting
heavy power users such as the MGM Grand and Caesars Palace to dim their
lights.
Don Soderberg, chairman of the Nevada Public Utilities Commission, said that
the sudden power emergency took state authorities by surprise and that they
are investigating to see what role the federal price limits may have had in
exacerbating Monday's shortage.
"We're looking very closely at this," he said. "There seems to be a potential
for unintended consequences."
Specifically, Soderberg said Nevada is focusing on operators of older, less-
efficient plants who would find profit margins shrinking, if not vanishing,
under capped prices.
"We're going to see how the caps might have played into this," he said.
The federal ceiling in 10 Western states, excluding California, is about $92
per megawatt hour. In California, a 10 percent surcharge is added because of
the state's credit risk, bringing the price to just over $101.
Ackerman at the Western Power Trading Forum said regional price controls have
extended California's power crisis to neighboring states.
"California sneezed and the rest of the region caught the virus," he said.
'LAWYERS LOOKING FOR LOOPHOLES'
California and Nevada officials, however, said that they still have faith
that price limits can stabilize Western electricity markets but that federal
regulators may have to tweak the system so that power companies cannot
withhold output.
"The generators have banks of lawyers looking for loopholes (in the plan),"
said Hidalgo at the Department of Water Resources.
Unfortunately, it may take some time for the regulators to revisit an issue
that they took up only with the greatest reluctance. For months, federal
regulators refused to impose price controls, preferring instead to let supply
and demand determine costs.
Hidalgo said that when it appeared that power companies were throttling back
on output Monday, California officials immediately dialed the hot line number
provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in case of emergencies.
"No one answered," he said. "They were closed."
State officials tried again yesterday, and this time were told that the
commission would look into the matter. They were not given a time frame for
when the commission might come up with a response.
E-mail David Lazarus at dlazarus@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1

Out-of-state generators pull plug over uncertainty on price controls
By Dale Kasler
Bee Staff Writer
(Published July 3, 2001)
Confused by the federal government's new controls on electricity prices,
generators withheld so much power from California on Monday that the state
was nearly plunged into rolling blackouts, state officials said.
The confusion began when the state's electric grid operators declared a Stage
1 power alert in the early afternoon, triggering the price caps for the first
time since they went into effect June 21.
Out-of-state generators pulled about 1,500 megawatts of electricity off the
table at midafternoon, enough to power about 1.1 million homes, because of
uncertainty about how much they could charge under the new Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission pricing system, said Oscar Hidalgo, spokesperson for
the state Department of Water Resources. The department buys electricity for
the state's financially distressed utilities.
"They didn't understand what they were going to be paid; there was confusion
over the FERC order," Hidalgo said. "We saw 1,500 megawatts disappear."
The problem was exacerbated by a heat wave across the West, which forced
California to compete with other states for scarce electricity, he said.
Rolling blackouts hit southern Nevada.
Most California officials credit the FERC system, which is based on a
variable price cap, with reining in what had been a runaway wholesale power
market. But power generators have complained that the price caps, by limiting
profits, could discourage the production of critically needed electricity.
And as Monday's episode suggested, even the uncertainty about where the cap
will fall could lead to unexpected shortages.
"That's the risk that you run (with price controls)," said Arthur O'Donnell,
editor of the newsletter California Energy Markets. "People want any kind of
certainty at all."
Hidalgo said the state avoided blackouts only because of last-minute imports
from the Bonne'ville Power Administration, the federal agency that markets
government-produced hydroelectric power in the Pacific Northwest. The state
went into a Stage 2 power alert, the next-to-last level before blackouts are
ordered. The alert was canceled in late afternoon.
The blackouts would have been the first in California since May 8.
FERC imposed a round-the-clock ceiling on power throughout the West. The
price fluctuates and is tied to the production costs of the least-efficient
plant operating in California during a "power alert" declared by the
Independent System Operator, which runs the state's power-transmission grid.
When there's no alert, prices can't exceed 85 percent of the cap that was
established during the latest alert.
Until Monday, the maximum price held steady at about $101 a megawatt-hour in
California. But when the ISO declared a Stage 1 power alert in early
afternoon, signifying that reserve supplies had dwindled to less than 7
percent of demand, confusion set in, Hidalgo and others said.
Because of a steep drop in the price of natural gas, which fuels many
California power plants, suppliers knew the cap would fall. But no one knew
by how much until the price was posted by the ISO.
The ceiling for California fell to about $77 at 3 p.m. but was back up to $98
in two hours, according to the ISO. Those prices include the 10 percent
premium that sellers can charge California because FERC said there's a credit
risk in selling to the state.
O'Donnell said it's likely suppliers will pull back from the market every
time the ISO declares a power alert.
In-state generators have to operate their plants if summoned by the ISO. But
out-of-state suppliers can withhold supplies, and on Monday it was the
out-of-staters that were pulling back, Hidalgo said.

The Bee's Dale Kasler can be reached at (916) 321-1066 or dkasler@sacbee.com.

Power Sales Halted by New Pricing Curbs
Electricity: Confused suppliers, unsure what they will be paid, refuse to
sell to state, which asks FERC for a ruling but doesn't get it.

By NANCY VOGEL, Times Staff Writer

?????SACRAMENTO--Confusion over new federal price restrictions prompted
several electricity sellers to back away from sales to California on Monday
afternoon, pushing the state closer to blackouts, energy officials said.
?????The state lost sales that would have provided enough electricity to
supply more than 1 million homes, said Ray Hart, deputy director of the
California Department of Water Resources, which has been buying much of the
state's electricity since January.
?????At least five companies producing or marketing power "are telling us
that since they don't know what they're going to get paid, they're not going
to take the risk, and so they're not going to sell the energy," Hart said.
?????The electricity sales fell through after power consumption soared in
summer heat and grid operators were forced to declare a Stage 1 emergency,
meaning reserves had dipped below 7%. It was the first such emergency since
May 31.
?????Under a June 19 order by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
intended to bring down wholesale electricity markets across the West, a power
emergency in California triggers the setting of a new price limit that
applies to power plant owners from Washington to Arizona.
?????The new price is supposed to be based upon whatever it costs to run the
most inefficient, expensive power plant selling electricity to California
grid operators during the first full hour of a Stage 1 emergency.
?????But much uncertainty remains about exactly how and when the new price is
supposed to be established under the commission's order, and that apparently
drove away sellers, Hart said.
?????Shortly after the state issued the Stage 1 alert at 1:30 p.m., putting
the old price limit of $90 per megawatt-hour in question, companies that had
committed to provide the state electricity hour by hour Monday afternoon
backed out, Hart said. The companies include TransAlta Energy Marketing of
Oregon, Constellation Power of Baltimore and Sempra Energy Trading, a unit of
the San Diego-based energy conglomerate.
?????Forced to dip even deeper into the state's power reserves and declare a
Stage 2 emergency, water agency officials called the federal energy
commission's hotline for clarification about what the new price should be and
when it should take effect. They got no answer.
?????Hart said commission officials reached at home promised to try to
clarify their order today. One outstanding question is what obligations power
suppliers have to deliver electricity to California in an emergency.
?????Both buyers and sellers in the market agree that the new price, when it
is set, will probably be lower than $90 per megawatt-hour because the price
of natural gas, the main fuel in California power plants, has dropped lately.
?????Temperatures soared several degrees higher Monday than grid operators
had anticipated. But they said they expected to avoid rolling blackouts in
part because the Bonneville Power Administration in Portland, Ore., had
agreed to provide several hundred megawatts of Pacific Northwest hydropower
each hour in exchange for a return of electricity from California later this
summer.
?????"Bonneville is giving us emergency power to get us through," Hart said.

Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times


Dana,

I work for Fred Cohagan in EBS Asia Pac -- and I believe he's spoken to you about the fact that we're scaling back around the region.

I had mentioned to him that I'd like to get involved with the Power Desk and he suggested that I give you a call.  If you're available, I'd be very interested in talking about any opportunities in your group.

I'll try to reach you on Tuesday afternoon, CST.

Regards,

Pat Leahy

Patrick M. Leahy
Enron Broadband Services
Global Wholesale Services - Asia Pacific
tel:  02-9229-2314
fax: 02-9229-2350


I plan to take 1/2 day (afternoon)  vacation on 10/16 (Tuesday) and 10/18 (Thursday).