Late this morning, the House Energy and Commerce Committee adoped the
committee print, as amended, of an energy package that addresses
conservation, clean coal, renewables, hydro, nuclear, and boutique fuels.
The vote was 50 to 5 to report the bill.  Other committees -- Ways and
Means, Science, and Resources -- also moved their energy bills this week.
Thus, the House is on track to consider a merged package before the start
of the August Recess on August 3rd.

As to electricity, during the several days of debate this week both
Chairmen Tauzin and Barton reaffirmed their intention to next move to
electricity issues.  Mr. Barton's staff advised me this morning that the
subcommittee he chairs will hold a hearing on Friday, July 20th on all
electricity issues other than transmission.  While Mr.  Barton has publicly
held out hope of marking up an electricity bill this month, sources on and
off the committee do not see this timetable as realistic.  On the Senate
side, the majority staff is working on an electricity "white paper" that
may be circulated for comment next week.

Below is a recap of action on amendments of interest to Enron:

1.   Last night, on a largely partisan vote (with Democrats Hall, Green and
John voting with the Republicans) the Committee rejected an amendment by
Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) (that was to have been offered by Rep. Anna Eshoo
(D-CA)) that would have retroactively amended the FERC refund date and
essentially ordered refunds regardless of amounts owed to power sellers.

2.   First thing this morning the Committee, again on a largely partisan
basis (with Democrats Hall, Green, John and Towns), rejected a Waxman
amendment to impose cost-of-service rates on all power in the West (other
than generation added after 1/1/01).  (Originally, Mr. Waxman was going to
offer amendment to impose cost-of-service rates only on those who do not
supply all available power during an emergency, but he ended up offering
basically what he had pursued in subcommittee on the old "Californa Only"
bill.)

3.   The Committee adopted an amendment by Rep. Shadegg to amend the
Natural Gas Act to make it clear that a natural gas "transportation
facility" shall not be added to the National Register of Historic Places
until FERC has abandoned the facility.  Apparently there have been some
instances of "old" pipelines being considered as "historic places" under
federal law.  The House Resources Committee added a similar amendment to
its package yesterday.

4.   By voice vote, the Committee rejected a Waxman Amendment to require
the president to propose and implement a plan to bring U.S. greenhouse
gases down to 1990 levels.  There was strong opposition voiced by many
Republicans and Democrats to this amendment.

5.   By mixed vote of 24 to 29, the Committee defeated a Waxman Amendment
to set cost and performance goals for renewables, including wind power, and
authorize federal funds to assist with commercial project costs (up to 50
percent).


Bubbie:
You are hereby invited to the tenth annual Spectron/Enron Celebrity Tony's
dinner featuring Brian Tracy, John Arnold, and Mike Maggi.

Regrets only,

John


Stephanie,  Gary and Cassandra signed this agreement but overlooked the
signature page for the addendum.  I will take care of resending it to Gary's
assistant for the additional signature and she will forward it to Mary.

Annela and Mary can you help us look out for it on Monday to make sure we get
it back to send out promptly?  Please forward the agreement back to Stephanie.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


I am absolutely delighted.

Kay

Tom Chapman@ECT
09/01/2000 10:13 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, aduncan@kilstock.com, Tom
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Conference Call this afternoon

Kay-- If I am stealing your thunder, I apologize.

I have scheduled the Conference Call for 1:30pm.  I expect that it will take
about an hour.

We are primarily discussing issues regarding our amendments to the
application.  Specifically, we want to confirm an amendment regarding the
layout of the plant.  Second, we want to confirm the LLC, and its appropriate
papers. Third, we want to talk generally about the Wednesday Conference Call
with the public staff and establish a game plan for handling possible
problems.

The Enron site will be the 48th floor at 48C2.  The Conference Call number
is: 1-800-998-2462.  The Pincode is 4579474.

If you have any questions. Let me know.

Thank you.

Tom Chapman


Shona, Brent and Sally,
This morning, the cash flows from approximately 75 books were not received by
Infinity from the ERMS system.  We normally get 375 books and only got 296
this morning.

Per conversation with Joyce Kuo and Mike Moscoso, Susan Trevino, Risk
Controls,  and Christian, RAC, changed the book heirarchy on Friday, moving
global products books, including the prepays, out of the ECT group and into
another group.  We have had discussions in the past verifying with Risk
Controls that the ECT group is the only group which automatically sends its
cash flows to Infinity.  Other cash flows from books are included only by
being listed in a script.  This was not done when the books were moved from
the ECT Group on Friday.

Obviously, the Rate & Currency is not able to hedge Enron's cash flows when
so much has been omitted.   At this time we are about one hour away from a
good Hedging report for the trading desk.  This report is due the desk daily
by 7:30 am.

Mike and I discussed the need for controls and sign-off by him or Shona for
changes in book heirarchy.
Sheila


Hi

Here's the info on our research test and development web site.  I'll leave it to Karthik, Tom and Chonawee to tell us how to use it.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: WebRequests
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:01 PM
To: Lee, Bob
Cc: Lu, Zimin
Subject: WebRequest Completed

The tech Peter Marsh has completed request of New Website Request.
Please visit http://webops.corp.enron.com/track.asp to let us know that this request was processed correctly.  The tech's notes were: Done. Site may be accessed at \\nahou\houston\webops\webdev2\researchtest  htpp://researchtest.dev.corp.enron.com


Here is the revised, and final form, of the ABB override letter for use in
conjunction with the FVP breakout contract for FVP.


I spoke to Howard Volz at CT Corporation today, and he said he sent the
renewal to DAPSA in November (their renewal date is Feb. 1 of each year) and
hasn't heard from them.  I asked him to refax the renewal notice to them.  He
said CT will not revoke the consent for about 5-6 more weeks, so we've got
some time to resolve this.  I'll keep you posted.


I spoke with Rick Vicens at PPE about the gas scheduling problem we're running into as a result of JP Morgan's delay in getting back to us on the L/C amendment/agreement (I have two calls into Rob Traband) as well as the new issue that we're currently investigating with respect to the Williams gas supply invoice due in November.  In light of the fact that nominations are due tomorrow and it is unlikely that the L/C amendment/agreement will be complete (let alone the L/C itself), Rick Vicens agrees that PPEP should prepay April gas so as to buy time to get the L/C in place.  Mike/Joe, please work together with Williams to determine the amount of the payment and coordinate with Theresa/Karen to get the wire out.

With resepect to the Williams gas supply invoice due in November, Rick Vicens agrees that if we do conclude that PPEP paid ENA and ENA did not forward funds to Williams, PPEP will need to make the supplier whole (like it did Lone Star).  He'd like to hold off on making the payment until we have all of the facts, provided that this doesn't interfere with our ability to flow gas to the plant as required.  Mike, you're in the best position to feel out Williams and advise us on this one.  Please try to get them to accept the prepay as a good faith effort to resolve the outstanding requests until we can finish investigating the payment history and lining up the L/C.  Let them know that if our investigation indicates that they've been shorted, the project is committed to making them whole and has the cash to do so.  Theresa/Karen, as you're setting up the wire on the April prepay please keep in mind that if Williams pushes back, we may need to increase the amount of the wire to make them whole for the amount due in November.

Margaret, please include in your review amounts paid to ENA by PPEP (part of the estimated payment shown in the spreadsheet you received yesterday) for supply costs incurred by PPEP under its agreement with Apache ($1,488,620).  We suspect that the fact pattern will be the same and wish to be prepared when the supplier starts to take us down that road.

Lisa, Chuck, Dan, Sylvia and John, this is being sent to you as an FYI.

Thanks,

RH

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hill, Garrick
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 4:22 PM
To:	Mazowita, Mike; Herrmann, Karen
Cc:	Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	FW: Outstanding Williams Invoice

Check that, James paid $3,125,227.76 to ENA in November per the attached.

I spoke w/Margaret Dhont in Settlements who will look further into the amount that came into vs. what was was paid out by ENA in November relating to the Cleburne facility.  She should be getting back to us tomorrow morning.

[Margaret, for your reference, the asset goes by Tensaka IV, Cornhusker, Cleburne and Ponderosa Pine Energy internally.]

RH

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hill, Garrick
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 3:24 PM
To:	Mazowita, Mike
Cc:	Herrmann, Karen
Subject:	RE: Outstanding Williams Invoice

James was making estimated payments each month for current month activity and the prior month's reconciliation to actual invoices.  To that end, he paid $3,715,582.50 for November 2001, the month the amount shown below was due, directly to ENA per the attached.  That's the same month the $108,405 Lone Star Invoice was due, which we know he had to remit to Lone Star after the bankruptcy (effectively "double paying" the invoice).  Since this didn't come up before he left, I think we can be reasonably certain that he didn't pay the amount shown to Williams.  The question is did Enron remit the payment to Williams?  Like you, I'm afraid to get the answer.  Is there a way to determine if we have a similar problem on Apache???

 << File: Plant-ENA Gas Recon.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mazowita, Mike
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 3:04 PM
To:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	FW: Outstanding Williams Invoice

I think I found another unpaid invoice. Trey Skelton called me and said according to their records, this invoice has not been paid. This is not good. Theresa Vos is out today and Karen Herrmann is diligently looking to see if this was paid directly to Enron. Like it would matter anyway...

Maz

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herrmann, Karen
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 11:35 AM
To:	Mazowita, Mike; Vos, Theresa
Subject:	RE: Outstanding Williams Invoice

I've scoured the bank statements for Tenaska and Ponderosa Pine and don't see where this amount was ever paid.  We do have the invoice, though.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mazowita, Mike
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 10:44 AM
To:	Vos, Theresa; Herrmann, Karen
Subject:	Outstanding Williams Invoice

Theresa or Karen:

Can you look into this invoice for Williams:

	Williams Energy
	Gas for Ponderosa Pine Energy
	$2,226,962.50
	Due Date:	November 26, 2001
	October 2001 - Gas Deliveries?

A FED ID number is really what I'm looking for.

Thanks,

Mike


Thanks, Ron.  Greatly appreciated.  For my part, please feel free to forward
along any articles.

Best,
Jeff

"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com> on 09/13/2000 10:52:21 AM
To: <rreilley@coral-energy.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>,
<smara@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: DJ - FERC Chief Pledges Action, If Needed, On Calif Pwr Woes

You have probably already seen the trade press accounts of the hearing this
week, but I wanted to make sure that you see this one, since it is more
evenhanded and informative, with less rhetoric.

Let me know if you would like me to forward the other articles that I've seen.

Ron
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 07:33:40 -0500
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll"
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: DJ -  FERC Chief Pledges Action, If Needed, On Calif Pwr Woes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

FYI - This article is very informative about the options FERC is considering
to address the California power market situation; no surprises for anyone
following this closely.  Please note that Chairman Hoecker felt the need to
emphasize the limitations of FERC's power under the Federal Power Act.

DJ FERC Chief Pledges Action, If Needed, On Calif Pwr Woes
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

(This article was originally published Monday)
     WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has
limited authority to address flawed electricity markets in California and
alleged price gouging by power producers, but will act to overhaul the
state's wholesale power markets if necessary, FERC Chairman James Hoecker
told a congressional panel Monday.

     The commission was ready to act once the results of an expedited staff
investigation of problems affecting power markets in the U.S. West becomes
available, Hoecker said in testimony presented to a San Diego field hearing
of the House Commerce Committee's energy panel.

     "If we need to fix market rules or market structures within our
jurisdiction, we will do so," Hoecker told lawmakers. And if price gouging is
occurring "as some have alleged," he added, "we will respond accordingly, by
revoking market-based rates or otherwise."

     However, Hoecker stressed that the commission's authority is limited
under the Federal Power Act.

     "The commission has limited ability to relieve the immediate customer
crisis. Important aspects of this problem are a state responsibility, such as
authorizing construction of new generation and transmission facilities,"
Hoecker testified.

     The commission can't act to limit prices charged by power providers
"until we have a record supporting such action," he said, referring to the
results of the pending staff investigation.

     Further, he said, the law bars FERC from ordering retroactive refunds to
San Diego Gas & Electric Co. for the power it purchased this summer to serve
its retail customer base.

     Hoecker testified before the House Commerce Committee's Energy and Power
Subcommittee, which is looking into the supply shortages in California this
summer that have forced San Diego electricity consumers to pay twice as much
for power as they did a year ago.

     State Mkt Structure Blamed For Crisis

     The hearing comes after much wrangling at FERC, as SDG&E, a unit of
Sempra Energy (SRE), sought an order setting price caps for power bid into
the state-sponsored electricity exchange, and power producers sought an order
allowing cost recovery for lost opportunity sales if the state's independent
grid operator curtailed sales outside California, where price controls don't
apply.

     FERC hasn't yet responded to the producers, and deferred action on
SDG&E's bid for price controls until the staff investigation is completed.
But it left in place an order allowing the independent system operator to
limit the price it pays for power, which acts as a de facto cap on prices bid
into the power exchange.

     Hoecker, while withholding judgment pending the staff probe, appeared to
place much of the blame for this summer's crisis with the state-mandated
market structure, which left San Diego consumers subject to spot-market
volatility.

     And he appeared to suggest that FERC's order directing utilities to
transfer transmission assets to control of large regional transmission
organizations, or RTOs, will offer an opportunity to develop a regional
solution to the power-supply problem.

     FERC deferred to California in restructuring the wholesale market in
California because its experience with new market institutions such as power
exchanges and ISOs was limited, Hoecker said.

     Other states, such as Pennsylvania, were "less prescriptive than
California in telling the commission how their wholesale markets should
operate," Hoecker noted.

     Now, with FERC's Order 2000 encouraging formation of RTOs, "the
commission is in a very different posture with respect to the structure of
wholesale markets," he said.

     "Large regional markets can be made to work effectively," Hoecker told
the lawmakers, citing the Pennsylvania restructuring as an example.

     Other witnesses were more forceful in criticizing the state-mandated
market structure.

     By requiring the state's three investor-owned utilities to purchase all
their electricity from the power exchange and limiting their ability to hedge
price risks by entering into long-term fixed-price contracts, the state left
consumers subject to volatility in the state-mandated spot market, said
officials with Enron Corp. (ENE) and Reliant Energy (REI).

     California's market structure "placed no economic incentives on the
default utility providers to look out for the costs that are ultimately
passed on to their consumers," Reliant's John Stout testified.

     "San Diego's experience offers the Congress an unparalleled opportunity
to learn from a bungled attempt at deregulation," said Michael Shames,
executive director of Utility Consumer's Action Network.

     Shames and other witnesses warned the congressional committee that
California's electricity crisis is likely to occur in other regions of the
country unless steps are taken to free up interstate trade in power and allow
FERC to better police markets.

     "California is just the latest problem area in U.S. power markets and,
unless policymakers act quickly, it will not be the last," said Enron Corp.
(ENE) Steven Kean executive vice president.

     "Unless Congress and FERC are willing to address the interstate issues
that are beyond the jurisdiction of state legislators and regulators, I
predict that our experience in San Diego is indicative of what others will
encounter in trying to create a competitive electricity market," said Edwin
Guiles, Sempra's president of regulated operations.

     "This electricity crisis is not a California-only problem," said Rep.
Brian Bilbray, R-Calif., who represents San Diego and requested Monday's
hearing.

     "We will continue to be in this mess if state and federal officials
don't work together to find long-term solutions to the flaws in the
marketplace," Bilbray said.

     -By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires, 202-862-6647,
mailto:bryan.lee@dowjones.com
     (END) Dow Jones Newswires 12-09-00

     1215GMT


Attached is the legal risk memo related to Enron Net Work's equity investment
in, and price posting agreement with, HoustonStreet Exchange.   Please call
me with any comments or questions.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	Happy Hour for Berney, Edith, & Brad - Cadillac Bar

Date:		6/20/2001
Time:		6:00 PM - 10:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in dark red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890 (GCP Team)
Enron Net Works _ Global Data Mgt.

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/03/2001 05:24 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals

Please see attached; thanks.


Return Receipt

 Your        RE: FW: Stepenovitch
 document:

 was         Linda Stepenovitch/USA/BAC
 received
 by:

 at:         10:27:34 AM EDT Today


has the williams deal been entered yet.  i need to send my end of month
numbers to apb.

thanks

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/28/2001 05:15 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

sorry - confusion - tom alonso had the williams deal with APB down as a
purchase, but he's changing it to a sale just in the interest of checking out
now. Deal # is 534492

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 03:05 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

do you know the williams deal number?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/28/2001 04:56 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

Yes - it's a Puget deal. I'm trying to contact Sean right now to see if he
and Diana overlapped on these deals. I only see them written once in his
trade log, but I'm auditing the second two to find out who entered them.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:54 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

534497 is a pudget deal?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/28/2001 04:42 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

Verified with Diana and Sean - these should be APB.

and the Williams deal should be resolved - deal # is 534497

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

i have 2 more things besides the williams deal.  apb is trying to leave thats
why i was trying to get these deals resolved.

534496
534497

apb does not recognize, these may be duplicated deals that are already in the
system.

thanks


The PD in the Gas Restructuring is out.   I have yet to read the whole
thing, but the title "Approval With Modifications Of The Interim
Settlement..." does not bode well.  According to Steve Watson (and I only
have Steve's statement second hand), the decision reflects a fear that the
timing is wrong in light of the current volatile gas price market.

(See attached file: Proposed.doc)

--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
626-302-2029
626-302-3254 (fax)

 - Proposed.doc


Sandy:  yes; it is a loss as both Rogan and Bilbray would have voted with us
on restructuring.    Lewis would not give up Appropriations where he is a
Cardinal.   Herger would not give up Ways & Means.  Rohrabacher would have to
give up International Relations which might be a possibility we could check
out.  But, do you believe Rohrabacher would be free-market on electricity
issues????  He is awful on free trade issues and supports sanctions.  The
National Foreign Trade Council gave him an "F" score.

But, hence, herein lies the problem.  Some of the best in the delegation are
already on top-tier Committees and will not move while those willing to move
might not be good on our issues.  Other ideas?????  Thanks.

	Sandra McCubbin
	12/01/2000 12:47 PM

		 To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: California Congressman

with Rogan gone, the delegation suffers, the  two that you mentioned are
definite possiblilites..would Lewis, Rohbacher or Herger have any
interest..they might be good..


Joe,

Attached is link for Financial Trading position.  Job descriptions may not match precisely with your position as it exists today, but that is OK.  We have tried to be as broad as possible in describing the open positions to minimize the number of posting links. Your job will not change, and your offer will be made for the position and duties you are performing now.  The posting requirement is by end of day on Monday, even though this link says by Friday.  You can access the link from the internet at the office or at home.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Randy Curry
email:   randall.curry@bridgeline.net
Phone:  832- 851- 2801
Fax:       832 - 851- 2772

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <MCIM@MSSITE01.ion.chevron.com>
To: Johnson, Linda (LVBA) <LVBA@MSSITE01.ion.chevron.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:35:03 GMT
Subject:

Thank You
The following req:

Req Title: Trader
Location: Houston, Texas, TX
Req Number: E020150066404
Department: Planning & Commercial
Create Date: 01/09/2002

Req Description URL: <http://respond.webhire.com/Chevron/jd1443.html>
Req Response URL: <http://respond.webhire.com/Chevron/rf1443.htm>

will be sent to:
America's Job Bank

on Tue, 14 May 2002 13:28:42 EDT


Jim,

We have to file a report  under project 22834 - pilot reporting in Texas today.  The data will be available at 4PM. Who on your team can I coordinate with to submit the actual filing?

The procedure to submit the filing can be located on the Texas PUC website   http://www.puc.state.tx.us/   left-hand side, filings.

Thanks in advance,
Rebecca


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <karen.mcnulty@usbank.com>
Received: from  rly-yh03.mx.aol.com (rly-yh03.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.35])
by air-yh03.mail.aol.com (v77.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:11:26 -0500
Received: from  mx02.usbank.com ([156.36.240.14]) by rly-yh03.mx.aol.com
(v77.27) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:11:11 -0500
Received: from 10.207.4.79 by mx02.usbank.com with SMTP (Tumbleweed MMS SMTP
Relay (MMS v4.7)); Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:12:01 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: 1e505468-1c7e-11d4-a4f6-0050da14be60
Received: from 10.88.32.240 by ntorccmx01.or.usbc.com with ESMTP (USBANK (MMS
v4.7)); Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:13:07 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: 9fbd4b68-d59c-11d3-ab85-0004ac4c2802
Subject: Next year's National Champ
To: kac5575@hotmail.com, "Scott Gascho"
<ScottGascho@HamptonAffiliates.com>,
JoeHutchinson@HamptonAffiliates.com, kauz@terragon.com,
markmayer1@yahoo.com, LillahMay@aol.com,
mcnultyleepatty@sprintmail.com, Matthew.Neff@phs.com,
DPIERCE@TAXANALYSIS.COM, lrodrigu@pcc.edu,        "Katherine Starkovich"
<kstarkovich@home.com>, kwoodall@standard.com,        woods@pacifier.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OF82409076.56864143-ON882569D2.0072AD3F@or.usbc.com>
From: karen.mcnulty@usbank.com
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:54:11 -0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NTZTWREM04/OR/Servers/USB(Release 5.0.5
|September 22, 2000) at 01/12/2001 12:54:13 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 1641ACE956430-01-01
X-WSS-ID: 1641ACAB38849-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=us-ascii

The Beavs may not be a preseason favorite, but they are in the hunt - see
link below...

http://www.sportingnews.com/voices/matt_hayes/20010112.html

Jason Rosario
Codesic, Inc.
Strategy & Operations Design Service Line
w: (425) 576-9292 ext. 142
f: (413) 473-8969
e: jason.rosario@codesic.com
www.codesic.com
Solutions for the Customer Age

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


- 1-16-2002.xls


See Attached.      In the interest of saving time I will ask that you review
the letter at this point.


Louise /Dave:

Fyi, see Theresa's email below.

I think this will clear up the issues we discussed yesterday. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Ben
--------------------------
Ben Jacoby

-----Original Message-----
From: Vos, Theresa <Theresa.Vos@ENRON.com>
To: Jacoby, Ben <Ben.Jacoby@ENRON.com>
CC: Pierce, Jody <Jody.Pierce@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Sep 18 08:40:05 2001
Subject: Asset Balances

Ben - per our discussion yesterday, the following changes have been made to the August Asset List that is presented to Louise:

Austin  - $0
E-Next Fees - $0 (off-balance sheet)  Since this is being accrued for monthly, we decided not to show it at all to avoid confusion.
Ft Pierce - MHI turbine NOT shown on ENA list - (off-balance sheet)

please call me with any questions.

thanks!
theresa
x58173

I forwarded your voice mail about the hotlist items to Trey Hardy.  He updates the hotlist weekly.


Reminder.....

Lisa Costello's baby shower is this Friday, November 30 at 2:00 p.m. in ECS 04990

If you would like to contribute to a group gift, please call me at x35746 or Lorraine Becker at x31680.  Lisa hasn't registered anywhere, so we are planning to get a Babies 'R' Us gift certificate or American Express gift check.

Thanks,

Tina Spiller

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Spiller, Tina
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:28 AM
To:	Hutcherson, Leesa; Kinningham, Laura; Yeverino, Norma; Campos, Karen E.; Campos, Kathy; Hankamer, Cecilia; De La Paz, Janet; Garcia, Grace; Clyatt, Julie; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Geheb, Robert; Whittaker, Brandon; Pickering, Mark; Broadfoot, Mark; Piper, Greg; Stone, Sandy; Barnard, Marla; Krone, Amy; Kovalcik, Tammy; Stark, Cindy; Rosado, Jennifer; Becker, Lorraine; Chisley, Katherine; Valdez, Christina; Beck, Sally; Estrada, Mercedes E.; Rub, Jenny; Johnson, Kelly; Millan, Allison; Joe, Allen; Winters, Ricki; McCurley, Peggy
Subject:	Baby Shower for Lisa Costello

 << File: Baby Shower.pps >>

Tina Spiller
Assistant to Greg Piper
President & CEO
Enron Net Works LLC
Phone 713.853.5746
Fax 713.646.8070


guys, I am out of town - John you will have to represent EA.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
10:04 AM ---------------------------

	Tracy L Arthur

	02/08/2001 09:16:35 AM

To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher B
Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Tim
DeSpain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Nelson/OTS/Enron,
Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT,
Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karin Ahamer/EU/Enron@Enron, Cathy
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Marion Sczykutowicz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CONFIRMATION - Associate Orientation Business Unit Presentations

Thank you all for agreeing to participate with the Associate Orientation -
Introduction  Enron's Businesses presentations.  The presentations will be
conducted on the dates and times listed below, as previously scheduled.  All
presentations will take place at the Doubletree Allen Center in the Dezavala
room.

If you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel
free to contact me at 713-345-7853.

Thank you again,
Tracy Arthur
Communication Specialist

LOCATION:
Doubletree Allen Center
Dezavala Room

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14
ETS  Stan Horton  Wednesday, February 14 9:15 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.
EA  Dave Delainey  Wednesday, February 14 9:45 a.m. - 10:15 a.m.
ENW  Louise Kitchen  Wednesday, February 14 10:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.
EIM  Jeff McMahon  Wednesday, February 14 11:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.
Trading Simiulation  Colleen Sullivan Wednesday, February 14 1:30 p.m. - 2:00
p.m.
EEL  John Thompson Wednesday, February 14 2:00 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.
EGM  Mike McConnell  Wednesday, February 14 2:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
EGA  Chris Hunt  Wednesday, February 14  3:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 15
EES   Dan Leff Thursday, February 15  8:45 a.m. - 9:15 a.m.
EBS   Kevin Hannon Thursday, February 15  9:15 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.
Global Finance  Tim Despain Thursday, February 15  10:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m.


Vince,
feel free to use this username and password to surf around the amrresearch
site
ken
---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001
01:23 PM ---------------------------

webmaster@www.amrresearch.com (Craig MacKay) on 04/11/2001 05:34:08 PM
To: Kenneth Parkhill <Kenneth.Parkhill@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: AMR Research Preview Information

The following is your user name and password for an AMR Research preview
account.

Username:        parkhill151647
Password:        remain

The preview section will give you access to the executive summaries section
and the presentation library. If you have any questions about AMR Research,
please email info@AMRResearch.com or call (617) 542-6600.

To access the preview section, please go to the following URL.
http://www.amrresearch.com/members


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 11/19/01.   The Yuma Companies (Inc.) has been added to this week's "Call Credit" column.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923,  Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436.


---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 11:04
AM ---------------------------

Janel Guerrero@ENRON
08/15/2000 10:37 AM
To: Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Massey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Air Consultants

Kevin/Bob:

 Here is a quick rundown on the consultants that Sam Wehn and his team have
been using in their efforts to obtain ERCs in the CA market. If you have
questions, or would like to see their resumes/bios let me know.

Joan Heredia, Woodward-Clyde Consultants
805-964-6010 x127
Joan is a project engineer in the field of Air Quality Mangement.  She has
previously worked for the County of Santa Barbara Air Pollution Control
District from 1985-1990.  In her current position, she provides regulatory
compliance expertise with an emphasis in the areas of air quality and
hazardous waste management.  Joan has various regulatory agency interaction
with California's Air Quality Districts and the EPA.  Her experience includes:
Prepared air permit applications at 3 bulk gasoline distribution terminals.
Public meeting participation and response to public inquiries concerning air
pollution control policies and procedures.
Air dispersion modeling and health risk assssment for contaminated soil
remediation projects.
Air emission control device efficiency analysis.
Emissions evaluation for boilers, flares, internal combustion engines,
turbines.
Served as the lead coordinator for a consortium of power generation companies
(AES, Enron, US Gen, Reliant and Calpine) in developing comments on the South
Coast Air Quality Management District Turbine BACT guidelines.
Project manager for all environmental permitting associated with the
development of a 500 MW merchant power plant in AZ.
Project manager for a 500 MW gas-fired turbine merchant power plant.
Prepared emission scenarios to facilitate operational flexibility and managed
the air quality impact assessment.  Prepared NSR/PSD permit application for
submittal to the Bay Area Air District.  Participated in public hearings and
served as expert witness for CEC testimony.  Participated in numerous
negotation meetings with the EPA, CARB, and Bay Area Air Quality Mangement
District for the development permit condition language.
Joan is a member of the Air and Waste Management Association.  She has a B.S.
in Chemical Engineering from University of California, Santa Barbara and an
M.S. in Environmental Engineering from California Polytechnic State
University.

Mike Hadari, self-employed consultant
cell:  310-710-9299
Mike worked with John Palmisano (former Enron employee), Josh Margolis
(Cantor-Fitzgerald Brokerage Services) on several trading-related air
programs.  Mike is currently assisting EES on some GHG issues.  He has a
heavy technical background (Combustion Energy Engineer) that has focused on
high efficiency combustion and energy-related projects.  Mike worked at the
San Jouaquin Air District for 2 years, and has worked at other consulting
firms before starting his own consulting operation.  Mike was one of 20
people who worked on the development of the RECLAIM program in the SCAQMD.
He has a broad range of expertise that includes technical, regulatory and
trading experience.  He has negotiated with a number of air districts.  He is
currently devoting about 95 % of his time today to Enron (EES and ENA).  He
is also involved in reporting functions for the CA ERC and RECLAIM programs.

Barry Ogilby, Attorney, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen
415-393-2496
Barry is in McCutchen's environmental, litigation and energy law practice
groups.  He has been involved with environmental compliance, litigation and
regulatory matters at the federal and state levels for than 25 years.

He was in house counsel for Exxon for 15 years, While at Exxon, he provided
commercial litigation support to Exxon's marketing, refining, pipeline
transportation, and oil and gas production operations.  He was appointed by
the Governor of CA to serve on the State's Oil Spill Technical Advisory
Committee.

He represents clients on a national basis on matters related to marine
transportation, the Clean Air Act (inlcuding project development and
compliance), and the Clean Water Act.  He has extensive experience in federal
and state compliance actions related to air and water laws and new permitting
requirements.  He often represents clients before federal and state
regulatory agencies regarding alleged violations of environmental laws and in
support of client efforts to obtain necessary environmental and land-use
permits for new projects.

Barry is a member of the ABA, and has served as an adjunct law professor in
environmental and land-use law.  He received his J.D. from the University of
Memphis and his B.S. Degree in engineering/geology from the University of
KY.  He is admitted to practice in CA, TX, TN and KY.

McCutchen's Environmental and Land Use Group consists of 70 lawyers in four
offices.  They represent landowners and developers, basic and high technology
manufacturing companies, transportation companies, trade associations and
governmental entities.  Members of McCutchen's Environmental Group who
specialize in Air Quality have experience in:  New Source Review:
Non-attainment and PSD ; State Air Permits ; Title V Operating Permits ; New
Source Performance Standards ; Stationary Controls ; RECLAIM ; Reporting
Obligations ;  and Emissions Banking among other things.

Kurt Marquald and Peter Okurowski, California Environmental Associates
415-421-4213
Kirk is the Founder and Principal of CEA.  He has worked on CA energy and
environmental regulatory issues for over 18 years.  He has led large-scale
regulatory reform and strategic planning projects for major manufacturing and
transportation companies as well as trade associations and law firms.  Prior
to establishing CEA, Kirk served as teh Under Secretary of CA Natural
Resources Agency as Director of the Office of Appropriate Technology.  He
managed budget and policy initiatives at the Agency's 9 departments.  He has
resolved policy conflicts between departments, cabinet officers, legislators,
companies, and private citizens.  He has also worked as a consultant to the
Environmental Defense Fund on issues related to energy, water and hazardous
materials.  Kirk has a M.S. in Natural Resources Policy and Mangement from
teh University of MI and a B.A. from Trinity College.

Peter is a Senior Associate at CEA with broad experience in technical,
political, and legal analysis on air pollution issues.  He works with clients
to strategically manage their position in ongoing federal, state and local
rulemaking activities.  He analyzes data and policy proposals to help clients
develop the appropriate level of regulatory action.  Prior to joining CEA, he
worked for four years at the U.S. EPA office of Mobile Sources in Ann Arbor,
MI.  He developed regulatory text and helped to form public policy for EPA's
economic incentive programs and emissions trading programs.  Peter holds a
J.D. from Indiana University and a B.A. in Economics from the University of
MI.

Overall, CEA has assisted clients on numerous environental issues.  CEA
Actions in the air emissions credit trading arena include:
assisting the client in managing permit and emission reduction credit issues
at a facility slated for closure;
performing analysis of possible excess credit streams under various business
assumptions;
intervening with the SCAQMD to resolve issues adversely impacting a client's
emission credit allocations;
educating the client as to possible trading and brokerage strategies; and
assisting the client in the auction of credits.


FYI.
***********************************************************************
UC Pioneers Conservation
Two decades of innovations prepared campuses for energy price crunch
When the state's energy crisis hit, the University of California was not
caught with its fans running full blast.
Across the nine-campus UC system, $65 million has been spent over two decades
on energy-saving devices, including new lighting, variable speed fans, even a
system to harness waste gas from landfills to run boilers.
So, with Gov. Gray Davis calling for every California household and business
to cut electricity use by 10 percent, UC offers a good model of conservation.
Despite rapid growth in the 178,000-student system in recent years, most
campuses have held electricity consumption steady, and the university will
net about $75 million in savings from the projects.
"We are fortunate to have on the campuses people with the religion. They have
been working on this agenda since the oil embargo," said Gary Matteson, UC
director of energy and utilities planning.
But UC will need to do more. Facing a 146 percent increase in the cost of
natural gas -- which powers the co-generators that produce electricity -- the
university is now asking the state for $217 million to fund additional
conservation efforts. That way, UC could offset the increase in natural gas
prices.
As a state institution, UC has to reduce its electricity consumption by 8
percent of its base load -- which is 334 megawatts at peak -- and by 20
percent during Stage 2 alerts, when state electricity reserves fall below 5
percent. UC has already exceeded the 8 percent reduction and Matteson said he
expects the system to be ready to meet the 20 percent goal by June 1, before
the summer peak hits.
Like little cities, the campuses run around the clock, but laboratory lights
that used to blaze continuously are now going dark when not needed, those in
hallways have been dimmed or shut off when possible and the thermostats have
been lowered.
"I almost stumble through some of the hallways, it is so dark," said Keith
Roberts, energy engineer at UC Davis. "There are a lot of people who really
want to help out. We are trying to do what we can without impacting the
mission of the campus."
At many campuses, daily e-mail alerts remind students, as well as employees,
to open their window shades to light and warm their rooms and offices during
the day, and to shut off computers and lights when they are not in use.
At UC Berkeley, freshman Jon Clingan, 18, said signs have been posted in the
hallways and bathrooms of the residence halls, imploring students to save
electricity in their rooms and even to cut short their showers.
"I try to keep my light off as long as possible until it is just not possible
to do work," Clingan said.
In addition to conserving energy, UC protected itself against skyrocketing
electricity prices by signing a four-year contract in 1998 -- along with the
California State University system -- with Enron Corp to buy electricity at
the 1996 rate minus 5 percent. In 1986, systemwide co-generation plants were
installed to produce sufficient energy for most university buildings and to
pump an additional 20 megawatts into the state's electricity grid.
That approach saved most of the UC campuses from falling victim during the
state's rolling blackouts -- although UC Santa Cruz went dark one day in
January because its co-generation plant was out.
MARKET PRICES AHEAD
Still, UC officials are asking the Legislature for extra money, warning that
a systemwide natural gas bill is expected to rocket from $26 million last
year to a projected $64 million this year. A contract for low-priced gas is
expiring and UC will soon find itself paying market prices.
That means UC will face having to raise dormitory fees, cut back on night and
weekend classes and turn down the air conditioners in the summer, leaving
classrooms sweltering.
Saying that that would be unacceptable, Assemblywoman Elaine Alquist, D-
Santa Clara, chair of the Assembly Higher Education Committee, called a
hearing on the issue last month.
"I really wanted to hear how they were going to cope with the crisis," she
said.
UC is already negotiating with the State Department of Finance to get about
$217 million for an additional list of energy efficiency and conservation
projects that could save 149 megawatts within three years. Reducing
electricity means reducing reliance on natural gas.
John Baca, manager of the policy and strategic planning program for the
Office of Energy Assessments at the state Department of General Services,
said higher education facilities tend to consume a lot of energy.
"They have experiments that just can't go off and they have a lot of flue
hoods, and things like that," Baca said. "They have to have power for a lot
of different things all the time, so there is still a lot of potential at the
higher education level. But I think UC has done a really fantastic job."
SYSTEMWIDE CHANGES
The efforts have been made across the system.
UC Santa Cruz undertook an extensive conservation project that reduced
electricity consumption in academic and administrative buildings by 6
percent.
UC Davis has spent about $15 million on conservation renovations during the
past 10 years, saving at least $3 million a year.
At UC Berkeley, more than $6 million has been spent since 1986 to improve
energy efficiency on the campus by modifying and reducing light fixtures in
older buildings, installing centrally located automated controls that can run
heating and cooling equipment on a flexible schedule, and improving
efficiency around heating pipes.
"Our usage is only 3 percent above what it was in 1972-73," said Paul Black,
a senior engineer in the UC Berkeley physical plant department. "And if you
think of all the computers added and also the air conditioners we have added
to cool computer rooms and labs, that is good."
E-mail Tanya Schevitz at tschevitz@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle   Page A - 3


Hello Everyone,

One more name change for today...


I received this from Marvin this morning.  We need to discuss how/if we
incorporate them into the LOI.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Marvin L. Carraway" <mcarraway@watervalley.net>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Marvin+20L+2E+20Carraway+22+20+3Cmcarraway+40watervalley
+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 8:19 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: [Fwd: EPMI LOI]

Reagan,please reveiw this list of comments again. The latest draft only
addresses item no. 5. MLC

Return-Path: AMalmsjo@rwbeck.com
Received: from [192.152.12.2] (HELO orlmail.rwbeck.net) by watervalley.net
(Stalker SMTP Server 1.8b8) with ESMTP id S.0000328507 for
<mcarraway@watervalley.net>; Tue, 06 Mar 2001 10:40:36 -0600
Received: by orlmail.rwbeck.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<1675AAYC>; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:38:30 -0500
Message-ID: <3F1E9D0FB6E5D1118D8A00104B64CF87CDD36C@orlmail.rwbeck.net>
From: "Malmsjo, Al" <AMalmsjo@rwbeck.com>
To: "Marvin Carraway (E-mail)" <cpuadmin@telepak.net>,  "Marvin Carraway
(E-mail 2)" <mcarraway@watervalley.net>
Cc: "Painter, Donna" <DPainter@rwbeck.com>
Subject: EPMI LOI
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:38:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0A65B.DF6A8A30"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Here are the  comments that I said I would send.  Feel free to call if you
have any  questions. - - Al

Al Malmsjo
R. W.  Beck
(407) 648-3521 - Office
(407) 421-5402 - Cell

 - Comments on EPMI Proposal.doc


Any instructions?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 05:34 PM -----

	Linda Robertson
	01/16/2001 04:54 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Ken Lay as NASA Administrator

I received a call today from Rep. John Culberson about a nascent campaign
underway to nominate Ken Lay as NASA Administrator.  Rep. Culberson has
broached this idea with Eugene Cernan, who liked the idea .   The Congressman
asked that we check to see if Ken is interested, as he would like to
orchestrate a campaign on Ken's behalf.  I promised the Congressman to check
as to Ken's interest.  Steve, should I snuff this out?  Give him
encouragement?  I need to call the Congressman back very soon.  Thanks.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Don't get too excited to hear about the rest of the day...I don't have much
positive to write.  It's been boring and I'm very uneasy about my role in
this group.  More later...

Mat


Tomorrow's meeting on O&M costs will be held at 4:30pm in 3125A.  Give me a
call if there are any problems.  Thanks
Ben


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001 10:25 AM -----

	Christi L Nicolay@ECT
	04/11/2001 09:21 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Cal ISO interconnection proc. Amend 39

I reviewed the Cal ISO filings below (in Sue's note) to determine general
consistency with FERC orders on interconnection procedures.  Potential issues
are identified below and you all can decide if Enron should protest/intervene
(the West Developers may want to review this too).   Since I am not familiar
with the Cal ISO procedures, I cannot determine whether protest is necessary
(for example, PJM, NY, and NEPOOL have certain interconnection policies that
would not be acceptable outside the pool, but that work ok for the pool).
The TOs have also filed Amend. 39 interconnection procedures, but I have not
looked at those to see if they mirror these.  Maybe one of the paralegals
could check that.  In addition, one of you should review the filing letter
and procedures to make sure that the statements made by Cal ISO are correct.

(Filing letter) The Cal ISO states that these procedures are filed in
response to FERC's orders and that the Cal ISO and Market Participants are
examining policies that will ensure that the ISO Controlled Grid is expanded
to support competitive markets.  It also states that it would have liked to
propose complementary changes to its long-term planning and expansion
process, but other priorities have prevented it from doing so.
Discusses the two previously methodologies regarding interconnection
procedures -- "No Grandfathering of Transmission Rights" and "Advance
Congestion Cost Mitigation" (which was apparently rejected last year.
(Filing Letter at 10) -- Cal ISO does not propose a method of sharing upgrade
costs, but states that the procedures do not preclude such a provision.  This
is one we have used in other Inter. Agreements:  If required by law or if the
Parties mutually agree to allow one or more third parties to use the
Interconnection Facilities or any part thereof (whether by transfer of the
Interconnection Facilities to an RTO or otherwise) and such use decreases the
capacity of the Interconnection Facilities available to TO or the Facility or
otherwise causes any detriment to TO or the Facility or benefits any party
(including TO) other than Generator, or if TO is compensated for the costs of
the Interconnection Facilities (in whole or in part) for any reason,
Generator will be entitled to compensation from TO based upon the pro rata
use of the Interconnection Facilities by TO, all third party users, and
Generator, for the greater of (i) whatever costs Generator incurred in
connection with the Interconnection Facilities, plus interest at the Interest
Rate from the date of Generator's payment of the costs in connection with the
Interconnection Facilities and (ii) the value that TO receives for the
Interconnection Facilities.  Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, the
Parties may use any other mutually agreed upon methodology to determine such
compensation.
3.3 If one or more third parties are to use the Interconnection Facilities in
accordance with Section ___, Generator's obligation to reimburse TO for the
operation and maintenance costs incurred by TO in connection with the
Interconnection Facilities shall be based on the pro rata use of the
Interconnection Facilities by TO, all third parties users, and Generator, or
on some other mutually agreed upon methodology; provided, however, that,
under no circumstances shall Generator's share of TO's operation and
maintenance costs be greater than its pro rata use of the Interconnection
Facilities.
(Procedures) The timelines for submitting applications and responding to
system impact studies (SIS) and facilities study (FS) are fine, per previous
FERC orders (in fact, Cal ISO asks for 60 days to complete the Facilities
Study -- PGE just filed requesting 90 days).
5.7.3.1.1.(c)  I would add "on a non-discriminatory basis" after "unless
otherwise agreed by the ISO, and the Interconnecting PTO"
5.7.4.2 allows the generator to perform its own SIS and FS, subject to review
by the Cal ISO and TO (this is a good provision that has not been adopted by
many utilities).
5.7.4.2.1 -- The SIS will identify adverse impact on "Encumbrances"
(undefined).  Someone needs to check this provision since I am not familiar
with this Cal ISO rule.
5.7.4.2.2 -- A New Facility Operator is entitled to amend its Completed
Application once without losing its queue spot.  Other utilities allow
amendments as long as the change is not "material", which has only been
defined by the utility and approved by FERC in several cases.  This Cal ISO
proposed provision could be problematic to other generators in the queue if
it is not limited to "material", (unless Enron is making the one time
change!)  In any event, check with West Developers on this provision.
5.7.4.3 -- This provision requiring a New Facility Operator to execute (or
have filed unsigned at FERC) an Interconnection Agreement within 10 days (if
no upgrades) or within 30 days (if upgrades) can be a problem.  Cal ISO does
not file a pro forma Interconnection Agreement in these procedures.  If Cal
ISO tenders a poor interconnection agreement draft (which happens all the
time with other utilities), then there is no way that Enron would typically
want to execute it within those time limits.  For example, Duke did not file
an pro forma interconnection agreement, but does allow 90 days for
negotiation.  In my experience, the negotiation of the interconnection
agreement can take a long time.  It would be advisable for the Cal ISO to
file a pro forma at FERC, then you can protest, if necessary, and at least
there will be a fairly decent interconnection agreement to use.
5.7.4.4.1(a)  -- The Queuing Milestones appear to be fairly rigid and quick:
require the New Facility Operator to comply with the ISO tariff and the TO
tariff and within 6 months of its Completed Application Date, satisfy all
applicable Data Adequacy Requirements of state and local siting and other
regulatory authorities.  I don't know that 6 months is achievable.  FERC has
approved milestones in other cases, but most contain language requiring
reasonable movement toward the milestones.  For example in Duke ER01-794
Section 41.5: (Transmission Provider may reasonably extend any such milestone
dates in the event of delays not caused by the Generation Interconnection
Customer, such as unforeseen regulatory or construction delays that could not
be remedied by Gen. Int. Customer through the exercise of due diligence, and
may also reasonably extend milestone dates to which the Gen. Int. Customer
has not agreed and which the Gen. Int. Customer has challenged at the
Commission pending a Commission determination as to the reasonableness of
such dates.)  In addition, the Cal ISO only allows one extension of 30 days
-- probably not enough.
5.7.4.4.1 (b) -- requires a New Facility License within 15 months after
satisfying the Data Adequacy Requirements.
5.7.5 -- does not provide for transmission credits for "network upgrades"
(upgrades other than the costs of interconnection).  The Cal ISO recognized
this exclusion in its filing letter at 11, but thinks that such issues are
appropriately addressed as part of the process to revise the ISO's long-term
grid planning process.  Enron has argued and won at FERC for transmission
credits in other utility cases, but I don't know what is appropriate under
Cal ISO system, so please check this carefully.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001
08:02 AM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara@ENRON
04/05/2001 03:18 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: FERC FIlings

I complained to the ISO Webmaster and Voila!  I guess I was looking in the
wrong spot

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/05/2001 01:14 PM -----

	WebMaster <WebMaster@caiso.com>
	04/05/2001 01:11 PM

		 To: "Mara, Sue" <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: FERC FIlings

Its under Public Info, FERC Filings and Rulings, Tariff Amendments.
Here's the direct link

http://www2.caiso.com/docs/2001/04/02/200104021630021868.html

-----Original Message-----
From: smara@enron.com [mailto:smara@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:05 PM
To: webmaster@caiso.com
Cc: webmaster@caiso.com
Subject: FERC FIlings

I am looking for the ISO's FERC filing that was made on April 2 --  of
Amendment No. 39 on the New Facility Interconnection procedures.


TRAVELSHORTS.COM (OTC BB: TLSH)
Latest price: 56 cents

This could be a company well worth keeping an eye on. There
is not much information available yet, but we expect to see
some exciting announcements in the very near future.

TRAVELSHORTS.COM INC. TAKES ANOTHER STEP TOWARDS ITS QUEST
TO ACQUIRE OIL & GAS ASSETS

VANCOUVER, British Columbia--Nov. 20, 2001--
Travelshorts.com Inc. (the ``Company'') (OTCBB: TLSH)
announced today that it has enlisted the services of Edison
Oil and Gas Ltd. to evaluate a number of oil and gas
exploration and development properties in the USA.

The management of Edison Oil and Gas Ltd. has over 30 years
of oil and gas exploration and development experience in
the states of Texas, California, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Kansas,
Colorado and Montana.

On Behalf of
Travelshorts.com Inc.
(signed)
Robert Sawatsky
President

This press release contains forward-looking statements
regarding Travelshorts.com Inc. and its future sales
related activities. Actual results could differ materially
from those described or implied in this press release as a
result of a number of factors. These include, but are not
limited to, the future growth of these markets, and adverse
actions by the Company's partners, competitive products,
other economic factors affecting the Company's markets, the
degree of acceptance that new products achieve, and
seasonal changes.

No stock Exchange has approved or disapproved the
statements contained herein

TRAVELSHORTS.COM INC. ANNOUNCES INVESTIGATION OF OIL AND
GAS RESOURCES BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES

VANCOUVER, British Columbia--Nov. 19, 2001--
Travelshorts.com Inc. (the ``Company'') (OTCBB: TLSH)
announced today that it has started to investigate various
oil and gas resources business opportunities primarily in
the Western United States.

As part of its investigation the Company is presently
reviewing and considering the independent analysis and
evaluation of various oil and gas properties. The Company
will continue this investigative effort as appropriate
properties are submitted for participation.

On Behalf of Travelshorts.com Inc. (signed)
Robert Sawatsky
President

This press release contains forward-looking statements
regarding Travelshorts.com Inc. and its future sales
related activities. Actual results could differ materially
from those described or implied in this press release as a
result of a number of factors. These include, but are not
limited to, the future growth of these markets, and adverse
actions by the Company's partners, competitive products,
other economic factors affecting the Company's markets, the
degree of acceptance that new products achieve, and
seasonal changes.

No stock Exchange has approved or disapproved the
statements contained herein

IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: The purpose of this
advertisement, like any advertising, is to provide coverage
and publicity for the advertising company, its products or
services. The information provided in this advertisement is
not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or
entity in any jurisdiction or country where such
distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation
or which would subject us to any registration requirement
within such jurisdiction or country. Verify all claims and
do your own due diligence. This advertisement is not a
solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold
securities and does not provide an analysis of the
financial position of the company. We recommend you use the
information found in this advertisement as an initial
starting point for conducting your own research on the
advertised company in order to determine your own personal
opinion of the company before investing. All information
concerning the advertised company contained herein should
be verified independently by an attorney, with such company
and an independent licensed securities analyst. We are not
offering securities for sale. An offer to buy or sell can
be made only with accompanying disclosure documents and
only in the states and provinces for which they are
approved. Many states have established rules requiring the
approval of a security by a state security administrator.
Check with http://www.nasaa.org and call your state
security administrator to determine whether a particular
security is licensed for sale in your state. Many companies
have information filed with state securities regulators and
many will supply investors with additional information on
request. All statements and opinions contained in this
advertisement are the sole opinion of the authors and are
subject to change without notice. We are not liable for any
investment decisions by our readers. Readers should
independently investigate and fully understand all risks
before investing. It is strongly recommended that any
purchase or sale decision be discussed with a financial
adviser or broker prior to completing any such purchase or
sale decision. We are not registered investment advisers,
or broker-dealers, or members of any financial regulatory
bodies. The information contained in this advertisement is
provided as an information service only. The accuracy or
completeness of the information is not warranted and is
only as reliable as the sources from which it was obtained.
We disclaim any and all liability as to the completeness or
accuracy of the information and for any omissions of
material facts. This advertisement may contain hyperlinks
to web sites operated by third parties other than us. Such
hyperlinks are provided for the reader's reference and
convenience only. We are not responsible for the
reliability of these external sites nor are we responsible
for any of the contents, advertising, products, or other
materials on such external sites. Our inclusion of
hyperlinks to such web sites does not imply any endorsement
of the material on such web sites or any association with
their operators. Under no circumstances shall we be held
responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any loss
or damage caused or alleged to have been caused in
connection with the use of or reliance on any content,
goods, or services available on such external site. Any
concerns regarding any external link should be directed to
its respective site administrator or webmaster. We may
refer to other sources of information, or other commentary.
We intend to offer these items to readers as additional
sources of information, but disclaim any implication that
we endorse information contained in such outside sources.
Any referral by us is no guarantee of the accuracy of any
information provided by outside sources. As we disclaim any
representation concerning source reliability, readers must
contact information suppliers on their own and gauge to the
reader's satisfaction the truthfulness of any source
information. It should be understood that there is no
guarantee past performance will be indicative of future
results. Any reference to past performance(s) of companies
previously advertised are specially selected to be
referenced based on the favorable performance of these
companies and the companies referenced may not be
representative of all past advertised companies as not all
past advertised companies may have performed as well.
Readers are cautioned that small and micro-cap stocks are
high-risk investments and that they may lose all or a
portion of their investment if they make a purchase in our
advertised stocks. In order to be in full compliance with
the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, Section 17(b), we have
received 25,000 free trading shares of Travelshorts.com
Inc. from a third party as compensation for the
distribution of this and other advertisements. Since we
have received compensation and hold stock in the advertised
company there is an inherent conflict of interest in our
statements and opinions and such statements and opinions
cannot be considered independent. We will benefit from any
increase in share price of the advertised company. We will
sell our shares at any time, without notice, be that
before, during or immediately after the release of this
advertisement. The liquidation of our stock may have a
negative impact on the securities of the company
liquidated, including decreased market value and/or
dilution of the company's securities. Furthermore, our
associates and/or employees and/or principals may have
stock positions in advertised companies purchased in the
open market or in private transactions. These positions may
be liquidated, without prior notification, even after we
have made positive comments regarding the advertised
company. It should be understood that any price targets
and/or projections mentioned are solely opinions and should
not be taken as suggested holding periods. In fact, we will
sell our positions in any companies advertised before they
reach such target prices. The receipt of this information
constitutes your acceptance of these terms and conditions.
Reading this advertisement shall not create under any
circumstances an offer to buy or sell stock in any company
advertised. Nor shall it create any principal-agent
relationship between the reader and us. The stocks of
advertised companies may trade in fast moving, highly
volatile markets, and any reader should observe the trading
behavior of any advertised company prior to investing.
Advertised stocks are often thinly traded and large sell
orders will have a substantially negative impact on share
price. Investors in advertised stocks may experience
difficulty in selling shares without seeing a decline in
market price and may have difficulty in finding ready
buyers of their stock. Information within this
advertisement contains "forward looking" statements within
the meaning of Section 27(a) of the U.S. Securities Act of
1933 and Section 21(e) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions
with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans,
projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future
events or performance are not statements of historical
facts and may be forward looking statements. Forward
looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and
projections at the time the statements are made that
involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could
cause actual results or events to differ materially from
those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements may
be identified through the use of words such as expects,
will, anticipates, estimates, believes, or by statements
indicating certain actions may, could or might occur. We
encourage our readers to invest carefully and read the
investor information available at the web sites of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at
http://www.sec.gov and the National Association of
Securities Dealers (NASD) at http://www.nasd.com. We also
strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to
investors concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be
found at http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm. The NASD
has published information on how to invest carefully at its
web site. Readers can review all public filings by
companies at the SEC s EDGAR page. All information within
this advertisement is qualified in its entirety by the
detailed information and financial statements of the
advertised company contained in its regulatory filings with
the SEC.

================================================================================
You are subscribed as: jeff.king@enron.com
To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.crmems.com/mail/unsubscribe.asp?email=jeff.king@enron.com
(If you are an AOL user, copy and paste the URL into your browser window.)
================================================================================


sorry,  I forgot to give you the info:

AES NewEnergy, Inc.
700 Lousiana Street suite 2250
Houston, Texas 77002

713-222-6080 main phone
713-222-6082 fax number

Amy

Amy Gasca writes:
>Hello everyone:
>
>Please make a note of AES NewEnergy's Houston address and phone numbers.
>If you should need to get in touch with me and or any member of our team,
> Please do not hesitate to contact us at our main phone number.  If it is
>urgent,  please contact me at my cell 713-545-0084.
>
>
>Amy
>
>Amy Gasca
>AES NewEnergy
>      Texas
>713-545-0084
>Fax 281-360-3207
>Email agasca@newenergy.com

Amy Gasca
AES NewEnergy
Texas
713-545-0084
Fax 281-360-3207
Email agasca@newenergy.com


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
BOWEN, ROBERT J                 LARRY J HUNTER                  Nov 01, 2000
CAMPOS, ANTHONY                 LINDA S BRYAN                   Oct 31, 2000
DIEBNER, BRADLEY M              WILLIAM S BRADFORD              Nov 06, 2000
NEVES, MICHEAL T                SCOTT N CLEVERLY                Oct 25, 2000
SEVER, STEPHANIE G              LISA LEES                       Oct 30, 2000


We have purchased 30 copies of the referenced book.  It is a short read --
about 30-45 minutes.  The copies are located at the clerks' station, EB3808.
Please read this short story prior to our ENA Legal Conference and then
return it to the clerks' station so everyone attending the conference will
have an opportunity to read it prior to the conference.


AMEREX
All deals checked out fine.

PREBON WEST

Matt Motley
I am missing the following deals:

Enron sells Reliant 50 mw of Q3 PV at $375
Enron buys Reliant 50 mw of Q3 SP-15 at $300
Enron sells Williams 25 mw of April SP-15 at $203
Enron sells El Paso 25 mw of June PV at $260
Enron sells Williams 25 mw of March Mid-C at $255

Chris Mallory
deal 530108
Prebon shows Enron as seller not buyer

BLOOMBERG

Diana Scholtes
deal 530260
Bloomberg shows 800 total mw....we show 400 total mw...

Thanks!


Michael Briney
248A Quassapaug Road
Woodbury, CT 06798
mbriney@stam.rc.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Michael Briney


Please find the most recent development of site track reports from Wei Tai here :

http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/sitetrack

The following additions have been added to this release
Group Total Usage report (displays # of hits by group)
Topic level report in Group Total Usage report, displaying activity by the top node of the crumb
User activity drill through on all reports displaying user data

Wei is currently developing graphs, as well as the ability to exclude groups from reports.

Performance is noticeably slow right now, but we will be optimizing the queries for the production version.
Please review and let us know of any issues you might come across.

Thanks,

Dave Dronet


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99
09:50 AM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Sager
12/16/99 05:50 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fax Machine on 31

Richard
Here is where Genia got on fax room search.  Lets's talk tommorrow about
where to go from here.
Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99 05:48
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Genia FitzGerald                           12/15/99 12:30 PM

To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fax Machine on 31

Elizabeth,

We have seemed to hit a brick wall in finding out who has monitored the fax
machine we have discussed on the 31st Floor.  Don Black's assistant,
Claudette Harvey said no one really collects the faxes and it is used by two
groups.  Kay Chapman another assistant on the floor said it used to be
monitored by Hub Gavela (sp?) but he is no longer here.  We called the
service number on the fax to see if we could get a "poll" report listing all
the faxes that have come in and found out this particular machine only has
memory for the last 10 faxes.  I have called Lucent (the telephone people)
and with approval from my manager they can give me a phone report of all the
incoming phone numbers to that machine since September 1st.  Please advise.

Thanks,
Genia


The letter looks fine.

	Gregg Penman@ENRON
	05/07/2001 11:23 AM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Agent Letter

Here is the agency letter that Mary drafted.

Gregg
----- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 05/07/2001 11:27 AM -----

	m.klyasheff@pecorp.com
	05/04/2001 07:53 AM

		 To: r.rodriguez@pecorp.com
		 cc: Gregg.Penman@enron.com
		 Subject: RE: Agent Letter

 Attached, for enovate's and Allegheny's consideration, is a draft
letter appointing enovate as Allegheny's agent for purposes of managing
Allegheny's agreement with Peoples Gas.

 <<Allegheny letter.doc>>

> ----------
> From:  Rodriguez, Roy
> Sent:  Thursday, May 03, 2001 4:35 PM
> To:  Klyasheff, Mary P.
> Subject:  Agent Letter
>
> Mary can you draft some recommended language stating Allegheny will
> appoint enovate agent to the executed Exchange agreement dated ? between
> PGL and Allegheny.
>
> I will ask Allegheny to take this language and place it on their letter
> head and send it to PGL. Note, we prefer this method instead of placing
> the language in the actual Exchange agreement.
>
> Thanks Mary
>
> P.S.  We expect to have language back from Allegheny on both contracts by
> tomorrow afternoon.
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Allegheny letter.doc


I'll be sure to let you know if I hear anything from any of the East coast
entities - NYISO, ISO-NE, and PJM.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Lon L. Peters" <lpeters@pacifier.com>
03/25/2001 06:21 PM

To: Mary.Hain@enron.com
cc: mhain@ISO-NE.com
Subject: Life After Enron

Mary,

Best of luck in your new responsibilities.  If you hear of any
opportunities for an economist at NE-ISO, please let me know.  I'm
always interested in what might "lie beyond" (but not "beneath").

Actually, I recently responded to an ad at NE-ISO for an economist to
study market structures, but never heard back from them.  Marcia and
I have family or good friends in NY, New Hampshire, Vermont,
Massachusetts, and Connecticut, and occasionally think that we should
move back, notwithstanding the winters  . . .  and the summers!

Lon

>I am going to be the Senior Regulatory Counsel at ISO New England starting
>on April 9, 2001.   My last day in the Portland area will be March 31,
>2001.  I enjoyed working with you and wish you the best of everything.  My
>new address will be:
>
>Mary Hain
>Senior Regulatory Counsel
>ISO New England Inc.
>One Sullivan Road
>Holyoke, MA  01040-2841
>(413) 535-4000
>mhain@ISO-NE.com

 - Peters_CV.doc
_________________________________
Lon L. Peters
Northwest Economic Research, Inc.
6765 S.W. Preslynn Drive
Portland, Oregon 97225-2668
503-203-1539 (voice)
503-203-1569 (fax)
503-709-5942 (mobile)
lpeters@pacifier.com

NOTICE:  This communication and its attachments, if any, may contain
sensitive, privileged, or other confidential information.  If you are
not the intended recipient or believe that you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender of this
communication and delete the copy you received from all storage
devices.  In addition, please do not print, copy, retransmit,
forward, disseminate, or otherwise use this communication or its
attachments, if any.  Thank you.


---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Burke/Houston/Eott on 03/01/2000
08:16 AM ---------------------------

Steve Duffy
02/29/2000 02:16 PM
To: Susan Ralph, Bob Jacobs, Scott Clark/Bakersfield/Eott@Eott, Michael
Burke, Gary Fuller/Bakersfield/Eott@Eott, Dana Gibbs, Lori
Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Cutty Cunningham/Houston/Eott@Eott, Mary Ellen
Coombe/Houston/Eott@Eott, Walt Zimmerman, Mike Frank/Houston/Eott@Eott, Molly
Sample, Edward Attanasio
cc: Scott Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: California Truck Wreck on 2/28 Involving Cummings and an Ex-EOTT
Driver; CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED ATTORNEY/CLIENT COMMUNICATION AND
ATTORNEY'S WORK PRODUCT

I believe most of you have seen the background/facts on this unfortunate
accident in which (1) an ex-EOTT employee (Hildebrand) was killed and (2) a
tank load of crude oil was emptied into a California river.  The oil belonged
to Tosco.  We had/have a contract to haul this oil for Tosco and were
performing through Cummings.  We outsourced our crude oil hauling function in
California to Cummings and other companies last year, and many of our former
crude drivers went to work for Cummings and these companies.  The oil has
gone into navigable waters and has reached the Pacific Ocean (during spawning
season).  This incident is on the front page of today's L.A. Times Metro
Section. ACCORDING TO ED ATTANASIO,  NEITHER EOTT NOR ENRON IS MENTIONED IN
THE TIMES COVERAGE.  It is quite possible that Tosco will seek indemnity from
us (in connection with this incident) under the terms of our hauling contract
with them.   The liabilities here for Tosco could be very significant.  Ed
Attanasio is monitoring this situation closely.

  We need to be sensitive to this situation for a number of reasons.  Someone
may tie EOTT or Enron to this incident, for the reasons above, and because of
the L.A. Times exposure, we could receive media calls about this matter.
Scott Vonderheide has been alerted in this regard.  At this juncture, we need
to decide where to refer any calls we receive on this matter.  Until further
notice, I would advise that any and all such calls be referred to Cutty
Cunningham .  Cutty, I think your response to any such calls should be that
we did not own the truck or the oil, or employ the driver.  We should
otherwise state that we are investigating the matter and have no further
comment at this time.  Also, Lori and Molly,  we will need to decide very
soon whether this matter will have any 10K significance. At the appropriate
time, we should see what Baird thinks.  We will look to Cummings and their
insurance carriers  to indemnify us----and be responsible for any claims
against us by Tosco-----but we are still trying to ascertain the value of any
such indemnity from Cummings and/ or its carriers. We don't have enough
information at this time to speculate on the magnitude of any exposure we may
have in this matter.  Ed Attanasio needs to confer with Susan Ralph and
advise on this ASAP.  Please advise if there are any questions. Thanks.  SWD


per Kelly Johnson x36485


This is a Return Receipt for the mail that you sent to
rogertan@swbell.net.

Note: this Return Receipt only acknowledges that the message was
displayed on the recipient's machine. There is no guarantee that the
content has been read or understood.

 - C.DTF
Return-path: <Peter.F.Keavey@enron.com>
Delivery-receipt-to: "Keavey, Peter F." <Peter.F.Keavey@ENRON.com>
Disposition-notification-to: "Keavey, Peter F."
<Peter.F.Keavey@ENRON.com>
Received: from mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta1-pr.rcsntx.swbell.net)
 by sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLT00C3OU9J54@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 rogertan@sims-ms-daemon; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:03:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.ngigpi.com ([205.252.36.66]) by
mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLT00I4XTZSWO@mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 rogertan@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 13:57:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com
[192.152.140.9])
 by mail.ngigpi.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA06516 for
 <prices@intelligencepress.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:18:49 -0400
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw01p.corp.enron.com
[192.168.110.108])
 by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08)
 with ESMTP id f9QJ1n303318 for <prices@intelligencepress.com>; Fri,
 26 Oct 2001 14:01:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified)
 by corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1)
 with SMTP id <T56d5b98a32c0a86e6c8a8@corp.enron.com>; Fri,
 26 Oct 2001 14:01:34 -0500
Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.41])
 by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
Fri,
 26 Oct 2001 14:01:33 -0500
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:01:12 -0500
From: "Keavey, Peter F." <Peter.F.Keavey@enron.com>
To: "Dowjones1 (E-mail)" <dina.omeara@dowjones.com>,
 "Dowjones2 (E-mail)" <john.edmiston@dowjones.com>,
 "Gas Daily (E-mail)" <gas_daily@ftenergy.com>,
 "Iferc1 (E-mail)" <kelley_doolan@mcgraw-hill.com>,
 "Iferc2 (E-mail)" <liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com>,
 "NGI (E-mail)" <prices@intelligencepress.com>
Message-id:
 <3891F8E98C93214B9E3E913CB7BF600220DBB6@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed ;
 boundary="{521390C4-C121-4236-9BB1-13397C42E810}"
Content-description: Daily Price Sheet.xls
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Thread-Index: AcFeUJXvMy32mWW3RPqDg81No2QGdg==
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2001 19:01:33.0417 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[A0F94590:01C15E50]
X-UIDL: 3a93eab200002b97


Could you please change the curve mappings on a type of trade for Robyn
Menear.  THe trade is a GD Index swap for out months.  THe product type is US
GAS Basis - GD/M Trunk WLA.  This is currently being mapped to a GDP curve
adn we need it changed to TRUNKL/WLA-GD.  Robyn sets this curve everyday as a
basis curve.  Thanks.  If you have any questions or concerns, please feel
free to shout.
PL


This presentation includes a synopsis of the assets that are in each of the major off-balance sheet vehicles which may be valuable going forward.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mitchell, David
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:53 PM
To:	Gorte, David
Subject:

Per Barry Schnapper's request I have attached a copy of the Creditor Committee Presentation...

David


Anita,

OK.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
07/31/2000 02:41 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Interview with Rabi S. De on Friday, August 11, 2000

Please also include Tanya, since she may be interested to have him.

Zimin

Shirley Crenshaw
07/31/2000 11:16 AM
To: Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Interview with Rabi S. De on Friday, August 11, 2000

Anita:

I believe that Zimin was the one that asked me to bring him in.  Maybe you
can check with him as to whether there is anyone else he wants you to
include.

Thanks!

Anita DuPont@ENRON
07/31/2000 10:26 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Interview with Rabi S. De on Friday, August 11, 2000

Vince:

Shawn Grady from HR Staffing called me and asked me to schedule interviews
with the people in Research.  He also mentioned that I should email you to
find out if you want anyone from any other department to interview Rabi.  I
am currently scheduling interviews with you, Krishna, Grant, Stinson, Zimin
and Vasant.  Is their anyone else in Research that you want to interview
him?  Please get back to me and I will set up the appts.  Thanks.  Anita


Hello Deborah:

I would like to introduce myself and Anita Dupont to you as we will probably
be working together quite a bit between now and our move.  Please feel
free to contact either one of us regarding any questions or needs you
may have.

Headcount
The Executive, VP and Director headcount for the Research group is:
Managing Director  1
Vice Presidents   6
Directors   5

Also, Anita and I would like to invite you to meet with us and go over our
library space requirements.  Please let me know when you have some
free time and we will be available.

My number is: 3-5290 - EB1961
Anita's # is: 3-0329 - EB1969

I look forward to meeting you,

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
3-5290


Kay,

I am trying to track down any information that may be in Legal's files on the JM Huber producer netback transaction.  My guess is that it would be either Jeff Hodge's or Gerals Nemec's files.  This deal was done by the deal makers in ENA's Denver Office.  I believe that the decision to assume or reject the Wyoming Interstate Company transportation capacity might impact the settlement of the JM Huber deal9s).

Thanks for your help,
Ruth


(See attached file: HPLN1024.xls)

 - HPLN1024.xls


VERY INTERESTING...
---------------------- Forwarded by Ceci Twachtman/HOU/EES on 11/10/2000
05:23 PM ---------------------------

David Haug@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/10/2000 03:19 PM
To: mklepper@skadden.com, Ceci Twachtman@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Article

---------------------- Forwarded by David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/10/2000 03:16 PM ---------------------------

Steven Haug@ENRON
11/10/2000 11:07 AM
To: Larry Abbott/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike Ames/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike
Bonnstetter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Max Brown/OTS/Enron@Enron, rd_cates@yahoo.com,
John Gormley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeff Hamlin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Danny
Holguin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Tarter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Al
Vandarwarka/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jon Wernette/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Norma
Nusz-Chandler/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Virgil Pfennig/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Numedahl/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, vdicke@courier.esu11.k12.ne.us, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, haug@tconl.com, vghaug@nque.com,
geoff@tconl.com, karenhaug@hotmail.com, laura.haug@amerus.com,
CindyJ.@prodigy.net, elmo413@carrollsweb.com, Marlene McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
daisyd43@hotmail.com, John W Rose/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, omaharoses@hotmail.com,
Norm Ruiz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, aly_gal@hotmail.com, Neta Zitnik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Article

DO YOU THINK HE WOULD??
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
 Al Gore and
Constitution
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
, 2000 WorldNetDaily.com

Ever since I saw Al Gore give that uncharacteristically statesman-like speech
defending the integrity of the Electoral College system under the
Constitution of the United States, I've been scratching my head trying to
figure it out.

Who was this guy? Was this the same Al Gore who has demonstrated -- time and
time again -- so little respect for the Constitution during the last eight
years? Why was he giving up on the idea of a challenge to the Electoral
College, when it seemed many in his camp were banking on that as their last
line of defense?

Well, I think I have figured it out. Actually, there are two possibilities.

The first thought that came to me was that this was Al Gore's
"Don't-watch-the-man-behind-the-curtain speech." While he was extolling the
virtues of the Constitution, his minions in Florida -- from Bill Daley to
Jesse Jackson -- were busy subverting it by any means necessary. It was Al
Gore's way of establishing public plausible deniability. He stood above the
fray, while his cohorts did the dirty work.

But, more recently, another thought has occurred to me -- a darker, more
sinister thought. I hope I am wrong. I pray that, this time, I am
overestimating the deviousness of Al Gore. But that, of course, is always a
difficult task.

Think, for a moment, why Al Gore would suddenly be reading and citing the
Constitution.

The answer is that, in this instance, it gives him all the power. What do I
mean?

Who is it, under the Constitution, that is specifically charged with
certifying the Electoral College votes of each state? You guessed it. The
president of the U.S. Senate, which also happens to be the vice president of
the United States. That's right. The day those Electoral College votes go to
the Senate to be counted and certified to choose the next president of these
United States, Al Gore will be holding all the cards.

"Oh, Farah," you say, "you don't think Al Gore would tamper with the results
in any way with the whole world watching, do you?"

Well, let's think about what has been happening in Florida for the last
several days. Al Gore's campaign managers have been whipping up hysteria
stating that the will of the people in that state is being subverted.

They are filing lawsuits. They are organizing marches. They are all but
accusing the Bush campaign of voter fraud.

Listen to what Bill Daley has to say: "More than 100 million Americans voted
on Tuesday and more voted for Al Gore than George Bush. Here in Florida it
also seems very likely that more voters went to the polls believing that they
were voting for Al Gore than for George Bush. If the will of the people is to
prevail Al Gore should be awarded a victory in Florida, and be our next
president of the United States."

They've decided that no matter what the actual vote count shows, Gore wins.

Now, all Gore has to do on that fateful day in the U.S. Senate is reject for
certification the Electoral College votes of Florida, and he wins the
majority and becomes president. Sorry, Bush fans. I don't think there's a
thing you can do about it other than protest, complain and stomp your feet.
Better start planning your legal strategy now. I'll bet Al Gore's transition
team is already hard at work. Barbra Streisand is probably making plans to
sing at the Inauguration. Alec Baldwin is unpacking his bags. This could be a
fait accompli. I guarantee you a counter to this bold move is not in the Bush
campaign's playbook.

The Gore campaign, still working overtime, has laid the groundwork for the
challenge. The Florida vote is tainted, they say. It's too close to call. Too
many irregularities. The vote can simply be dismissed by the constitutional
authority -- Vice President Al Gore.

Would you put it past him? I sure wouldn't.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Joseph Farah is editor and chief executive officer of WorldNetDaily.com and
writes a daily column.


Thank you for the invitation.  Unfortunately Debbie and I will not be able to
attend due to previous committments.

Mike_McConnell%ECT%ENRON@EOTT.COM@EOTT.COM on 05/02/2001 10:57:28 AM
Sent by: Cathy_Phillips%ECT%ENRON@EOTT.COM
To: Stan_Horton@eott.com
cc:

Subject: JDF Gala

I would like to invite you and a guest to join me for the annual Juvenile
Diabetes Foundation Gala to be held on May 12, 2001 at the Westin Galleria.
The guest speaker this year will be General Norman Schwarzkof.

Please contact Cathy Phillips (X-36898) and let her know if you are
interested in attending.  Thank you.

Mike


makes sense to me...I know from trying to negotiate with smud on the weather
deal that they need approval to post collateral.  I like the idea that they
have 3 days to provide evidence that they are going to the board and then a
further 7 to get it approved and posted. thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  St Clair, Carol
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:17 AM
To: Rohauer, Tanya
Subject: RE: SMUD EEI Master

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001 10:16 AM -----

	Tracy Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate 05/16/2001 10:13 AM 	   To: Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: RE: SMUD EEI Master

Given they are a muni, I am fine with this exception.  In practice, we have
experienced situations with certain cp's where we have had to come up with
certain margining exceptions.

WRT amendments, such amendments can be done within the same time period as
well.  I think that we could add that the cp is required to provide a
representation (perhaps an officer's certificate of some sort) stating that
they are going to their Board for posting of the collateral.

We got that provision from another municipality.

Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From:  St Clair, Carol
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 7:11 AM
To: Ngo, Tracy
Cc: Rosman, Stewart
Subject: SMUD EEI Master

Tracy:
Are you sure that you are okay with extending the time to deliver collateral
from 3 Business Days to 10 Business Days?  I have never seen us agree to that
long of a time period?  What if Exposures change from the time that we
request collateral and the time that they deliver it to us?  If all they are
doing is posting cash or amending an LC, why would they need 10 Business
Days?  Please call me.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Agenda:	Discuss results and next steps from Accenture study.
		Agree on East Desk Power/IT project focus over the next 6 months.
		Assign IT and East Desk owners for each project.
		Agree on format and content of documentation needed to secure sponsorship.
			(high-level workplans and inception documents - ie... scope, benefit, timeline, resources, etc..)
		Agree on timeframe to complete documentation and present to Lloyd, Kevin, and Sally for approval.
		Discuss Louise and Lavorato approval requirements, if any.
		Discuss post-approval next steps, including staffing options.

Notes:
Phone number for EB2601 is 713-853-5558.
Dave Poston and Stacey White will be in Portland.
Mike Marryott will call from Canada.

Meeting Time has changed.  Let me know ASAP if you have a conflict.

A sandwich lunch will be provided for all who attend (in Houston). Please reply quickly so we can place the lunch order.  Also, indicate if you require a vegetarian diet.   Thank you.


It's been changed - and out of curiosity, when does Daylight Savings Time
start? March, I think?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/16/2001 11:39 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 524249

Kate the time zone on this deal should be PPT instead of PST.

Thanks!