John

Following the interviews next week, suggest your management team get together to review the rotations for the Trading Track, to see if they continue to meet business/Employe needs to ensure we have accurate data from a tracking perspective.

Karen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Gilbert-Smith, Doug; Will, Lloyd; White, Stacey; Baughman, Don; Arora, Harry; Davis, Dana; Herndon, Rogers; Gossett, David; Gaskill, Chris; Superty, Robert; Lagrasta, Fred; McMichael Jr., Ed; Neal, Scott
Subject:	Existing Trading Track Rotations

Attached is the current list of rotations for the Trading Track participants and future assigned rotations (as decided at the time of hiring).    Can you please re-confirm you have these people in your group currently, as I appear to have conflicting information.  I will re-send, if any changes occur.

If there is any movement of these people between groups can you plese keep me in the loop.

Kind regards,

Karen.
x54667


Marty:
 Absolutely yes! We are now using option functions in the Exotic options
library (in R:\Exotica which everybody in Risk Management has access to)
instead of the old Visual Basic code in the powermod file. This improved the
calculation speed for options quite a bit.

 We are also embarking on a new project to develop the next generation
structuring and pricing models. I will discuss about this project in more
detail with you soon and get your input, but the main goals I see now are:

1. Superior performance (speed) to enable fast pricing especially for the
underwriting group,
2. Proper documentation for easy maintenance and ability to quickly adapt to
meet future needs, and
3. Security/access control to the files.

The first stage in this process is to take inventory of what we have: I am
documenting the current structuring models. This step is important not only
for developing our next generation models but also for the AA audit of all
the EES pricing models.

Krishna.

To: Maureen Craig/HOU/EES@EES, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: New POWERMOD97.xls

any performance improvement to be expected?
---------------------- Forwarded by Marty Sunde/HOU/EES on 07/26/2000 10:14
AM ---------------------------

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao@ECT
07/24/2000 01:37 PM
To: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Hong/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Alexios Kollaros/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: New POWERMOD97.xls

We have made enhancements to POWERMOD97.xls model to enable proper processing
from the batch model. These changes should not affect current functionality
of this file. We will be putting the new version into production later today.
Please contact me or Alex Kollaros (x39806) with your comments or problems.

Thanks,
Krishna
x35485.


November 21, 2001
Due to the unplanned outage of the Gerber Compressor Station, California Gas Transmission's maximum system inventory limit is capped at 4,500 MMcf. Because the outage was a force majeure event, this upper limit will be in place immediately. The outage is expected to last approximately six months.
Today's maximum system inventory limit is already 4,500 MMcf because total system demand is low. If total system demand increases above 2,800 MMcf, the maximum system inventory limit would normally be raised to 4,600 MMcf. Instead, it will remain at 4,500 until Gerber can be brought back online.


Do you guys follow these reports?  Do we need to correct them?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/09/2000 08:50 AM -----

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	10/09/2000 04:05 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Calling All Investors: The New Power Company's IPO Priced at $21
Per Share

Was Enron actually banned from the California residential market, as per
below?  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 09/10/2000
10:08 ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "IssueAlert" <IssueAlert@scientech.com>
06/10/2000 12:13

To:
cc:

Subject: Calling All Investors: The New Power Company's IPO Priced at $21 Per
Share

http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************
SCIENTECH's timely and newest InfoGrid, The Telecommunications InfoGrid,
will help you keep up with the latest moves of energy companies into the
fast-growing telecom market.  Learn more about SCIENTECH'S InfoGrids at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/InfoGrid
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, October 6, 2000
Calling All Investors: The New Power Company's IPO Priced at $21 Per Share
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

TNPC, Inc., parent of The New Power Company, announced yesterday that its
initial public offering (IPO) of 24 million common shares was priced at
$21 per share. The stock closed yesterday at $27 per share. The Company
expects to receive net proceeds from the offering of its shares at
approximately
$473 million, exclusive of the underwriters' option to purchase an additional
3,600,000 common shares to cover over allotments. TNPC, Inc.*a partnership
between Enron, America Online (AOL) and IBM*was formed in late 1999 to
provide electricity and natural gas directly to households and small
businesses
in the deregulated energy marketplace. TNPC's shares will be listed on
the NYSE under the symbol NPW. Closing of the offering is expected to occur
Oct. 11.

ANALYSIS: I am sure that many eyebrows were raised when TNPC issued the
IPO of its stock at $21, a figure that seemed surprisingly high for a start-up
company that has been in operation only since early summer. It is rather
mind-boggling that a company with no significant track record could open
its stock at such a price, but it is not unheard of. In fact, TNPC is
following
a trend of new Internet companies initiating IPOs that are supported by
grand concepts rather than tangible success. However, the TNPC "dream team"
alliance between Enron, AOL and IBM has been met with great expectations
(and a lot of skepticism as well) throughout the industry.

I read through the S-1/A filing that TNPC submitted to the SEC, so hopefully
I can cut through the hype regarding this deal to get to its nucleus. First,
TNPC acknowledges repeatedly throughout its filing that it is entering
into an extremely high-risk venture, and in fact will "incur substantial
operating and net losses, and cannot assure that we will attain
profitability."
Further, TNPC admits that it expects to incur these losses for a
"significant,"
but undetermined, period of time. Why, then, would Wall Street be greeting
this IPO with such a positive welcome? One could easily argue that the
sheer market presence of Enron, AOL and IBM has by association driven up
the value of TNPC, but I think a deeper answer lies within several factors.

First, TNPC has been bankrolled by some hefty investments. In two separate,
private placements, investors such as Enron, GE Capital Equity Investments
and DLJMB Partners (among others) put up about $214 million in start-up
capital in exchange for shares in the company. Enron is the majority owner
of TNPC, with 57-percent control. This money has allowed TNPC to make
important
acquisitions. For instance, TNPC bought the residential and small commercial
retail energy business of Columbia Energy Group, which includes approximately
285,000 natural-gas customers and 20,000 electricity customers in eight
states. This is a valuable card in TNPC's deck as it locks in customers
during this time when deregulation is developing slowly in retail markets.
I wouldn't be surprised if TNPC makes a similar acquisition of another
customer base in the near future, such as in Texas, where customers have
been spun off to energy service companies rather than being held by the
T&D operations of utilities. In other words, in Texas TNPC could easily
buy customers without having to buy wires or infrastructure, assuming there
is a willing seller.

Second, and perhaps more importantly, earlier this year Enron transferred
its residential and small commercial retail operations in California and
Ohio to TNPC. This deal included the operations of Enron Energy Services
but did not include PG&E Energy Services, which Enron acquired earlier
this year. Together with the Columbia Energy Group acquisition, TNPC has
come out of the gate running with a significant beginning customer base
of over 325,000 customers. Why would Enron have turned over its residential
customers to TNPC?  Don't forget that Enron struggled in and retreated
from the California residential market, stating that it couldn't make any
money in the retail market. TNPC's S1/A filing confirms rumors that Enron
Energy Services actually retreated from California due to a lawsuit claiming
the company had violated laws relating to advertising directed to residential
consumers in 1997 and 1998. Enron was in fact banned from selling power
to the residential market in California. Under this customer transfer,
Enron is able to put its money into a completely separate business*essentially
moving this high-risk business venture, and worst performing part of its
retail service, off its own books. Yet if TNPC succeeds, Enron still benefits
as it is the majority owner.

I think these two factors answer why Wall Street has looked so favorably
on a self-described "new company with a limited operating history." Looking
ahead, can TNPC maintain this comparatively high value of its stock?  Well,
there's both good news and bad news for TNPC. First, let's look on the
bright side. TNPC has put into place a great management team, starting
with H. Eugene Lockhart, formerly of AT&T, as president and CEO. Other
key players bring retail market expertise from work at MasterCard, Exxon
and PespiCo. In addition, within the energy industry, TNPC arguably could
not have a better backer than Enron. What other company's touch has been
golden in nearly every venture it has pursued? In addition to being the
majority owner, Enron probably is also providing TNPC access to commodities
at preferential prices, which will certainly enhance its sales approach
in the retail market. Plus, TNPC has access to the 24 million customers
that AOL represents, which I've always thought was the company's secret
weapon.

But then there are the risks, and they are substantial. First, competition
is not materializing rapidly on the retail side. In a state like Pennsylvania,
which perhaps represents the strongest deregulated market in the United
States, only about 16 percent of customers in PECO's territory have opted
to switch their provider. So, TNPC has an uphill climb, to say the least,
in making any inroads at capturing a lock*and making money*in the retail
market. Second, the only way that I can see TNPC making it at all is if
they continue to buy customers like they did from Columbia Energy Group.
There are big questions surrounding whether the company will be able to
do this or not, and much of its success hinges on this uncertainty.

Third, and perhaps most serious of all, is TNPC's vulnerability on the
technology side of its operation. TNPC has entered into a 10-year revenue
management and customer care agreement with IBM Global Services, under
which IBM will manage the company's online commerce and billing applications.
IBM's track record in developing customer care systems is less than stellar.
In fact, PG&E initiated a lawsuit against IBM a few years ago when the
utility had to pull the plug on a massive $100 million customer information
system (CIS), employed by IBM, which it claimed was ineffective. IBM has
partnered with SCT to provide the infrastructure to be used by TNPC. Under
an agreement between IBM Global Services and SCT, the SCT Banner CIS will
be integrated into a number of back-office IT solutions under development
by IBM for TNPC. Experts in the CIS industry have questioned whether SCT's
Banner CIS can handle over one million customers. If it cannot, this will
surely limit TNPC's growth potential.

Moreover, although TNPC's IPO signals a strong future, there are many
uncertainties
surrounding this nascent operation. As one of the few major players in
the energy retail market, TNPC has very few competitors, with the possible
exceptions of NewEnergy or GreenMountain. Another competitor is also emerging
in Britain's Centrica, which plans to expand in North America after its
recent acquisition of Canadian retail gas supplier Direct Energy.
Consequently,
the coming year could either make or break TNPC and the challenges that
the company faces in wanting to conquer the retail market are extremely
steep.
==============================================================

Learn more about SCIENTECH's Issues and Analysis products and services
at:

 http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-IA.html

===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products including e-commerce and telecom in the electric utility
industry. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free, daily
IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their full name and
email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


Offered ePrime FT.....5 cents East to East (ie, Tumbleweed and Oasis) with
alternate firm to Needles at Permian-SoCal Gas Daily differential less fuel,
then splitting profits TW 75% and ePrime 25%.
Working with Bob Burleson with SPS power plant connection.  Offered ePrime
(the gas managers and affiliate of SPS) a .03 cent transport rate from Oasis
to the new proposed interconnect (Panhandle leg) in exchange for volume
commitment of 3 bcfs over 5 years.  ePrime is planning on using the transport
for loads during the 4 peaking summer months.
Analyzed West flow transport contracts for future expiration dates without
ROFR extentions.  Putting together list of details for solicitation, allowing
us to sell and hedge higher transport rates and taking advantage of current
market spreads


I've tried sending this 3 times.  Please see if you can figure out the
problem.  I've used the autoaddressing and his long internet address.  If all
else fails, just print and have it delivered, I guess, or send it to his
assistant.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/14/2001 01:40
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
05/14/2001 01:03 PM
To: timothy.j.detmering@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Confidentiality agreement

I've received error notices, so I'm trying again.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/14/2001 01:02
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
05/14/2001 01:00 PM
To: Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate, Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT
cc: John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, W David Duran/Enron@EnronXGate, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Confidentiality agreement

Gentlemen,

I'm with EWS Legal, and I'm working with John Llodra (East Power origination)
concerning a confidentiality agreement with Ameresco.  The proposed
transaction is described as follows:

 A potential power plant site development and asset management services
related to the Island End Generation Project, a nominal  365 MW combined
cycle power generation facility, proposed to be located in Everett,
Massachusetts.

The current draft of the CA contains this language:

 From the time of the signing of this Agreement until October 1, 2001 neither
Party shall pursue the Proposed Transaction without  the participation of the
other Party, unless the other Party consents in writing or notifies the other
Party that it does not intend to   pursue the Proposed Transaction.

In accordance with policy, this issue is being submitted to you for your
review.

John can be contacted at 978 449 9936.  My extension is 57566.

Thank you,

Kay

Here is the entire CA:


Girl, you better go!

N


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


no i am just hearing that most everyone got promoted

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:35 PM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

i have no idea.  did you hear he was?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:32 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

just wondering - mainly i was wondering if matt smith is a manager now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:30 PM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

i don't know.  why?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:22 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

who all got promoted on your desk?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	Blanchard, Timothy; Bass, Eric; O'Malley, Justin; 'val.generes@accenture.com'; 'kevin.a.boone@accenture.com'
Subject:	FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bhatia, Randy
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:00 AM
To:	Wolfe, Jason; Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:

http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~rahjr79/ninja.htm


We Agree

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 04/11/2001 10:35:23 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM, LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  noms/ actual flow for april 10th

nom       mcf       mmbtu
40,000         41,447         42,566

btu = 1.027


Brad:   this is just a test e-mail re Port O'Connor.  I have added you
to the list now that I have your e-mail.  I hope Tim has sent you some
of the earlier stuff so you will be up to date.  We are trying hard to
wrap up the accounting with Marc Deer so we can start conveying
individual units.  Deer promises to do all the punchlist items.  If you
have anything that's bugging you, call Marc.  You should also be getting
by mail a letter from the condo association board about THE RULES, which
should give you some flavor for where we stand now.
Welcome to the club, I look forward to meeting you and doing some
fishing.

John Wallace


FYI...
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron on 08/17/2000
12:35 PM ---------------------------

"Triem, Mike" <Mike.Triem@COMPAQ.com> on 08/17/2000 10:11:29 AM
To: "'Colvin, Craig'" <Colvin_Craig@Valic.com>, "'Ernest Blansfield'"
<EBlansfield@Ideon-Inc.com>, "'Gambrell, Brian'" <bgambrell@corestaff.com>,
"'Hank Kuczynski'" <Hank_Kuczynski@Valic.com>, "'Jose Beiro'"
<Jose_Beiro@AGC.com>, "'Lowney, Jeff (home)'" <casafun@aol.com>, "'Mario
Reyna'" <mreyna@agannuity.com>, "'Michelle Lokay'" <mlokay@enron.com>,
"'Miller, Randy'" <Miller_Randy@Agc.com>, "'Mitch Provost'"
<mitchp@atlantia.com>, "'Nick Allen'" <nick_allen37@hotmail.com>, "'Norman
Comstock'" <NComstock@Ideon-Inc.com>, "'Pat Whitworth'"
<Patwhitworth@hotmail.com>, "'Ravain, Mike'" <mcravain@equilon.com>,
"'Wendler, Doug'" <Doug.Wendler@enform.com>
cc:

Subject: Dell Computer Financial Practices

Interesting information about Dell...

Mike Triem
NA IPAQ & Displays Business Planning
281.927.8586

> Here's an interesting little tidbit about Dell's stock...
>
>
>  <<Dell Computer Financial Practices.htm>>

 - Dell Computer Financial Practices.htm


Hi,

Here is the broker's quote from Amerex as of 03/15/2002.   Based on the broker's quote, the valuation summary for the deal starting from June 2002 forward is also attached.  Please let us know if you need any details for the valuation - we would greatly appreciate your advice, as soon as  possible, regarding the "form of settlement offer" we should use to approach MCV.

Thank you very much for your help.

Best Regards,

Yuan Tian
Associate/Enron
Ext. 53579


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 09/29/2000 03:53 PM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	09/26/2000 08:10 PM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: USA: U.S. electric utilities
want new depreciation rules ...

[IMAGE]
USA: U.S. electric utilities want new depreciation rules.
?
09/26/2000
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2000.

WASHINGTON, Sept 26 (Reuters) - U.S. utilities want federal tax laws changed
to allow electric generation facilities to be depreciated over seven years
instead of the current 15-20, an industry trade group told a House
subcommittee on Tuesday.

Officials from the Alliance of Energy Suppliers, the energy supply division
of the Edison Electric Institute, said rapid deregulation and consolidation
in the industry made the old depreciation rules obsolete, and hurt the
sector's ability to attract investment for new plant construction.

Under the old school, regulated market structure, dividend payments to
utility investors were more or less predictable, but that was no longer the
case in openly competitive markets.

"Previously applicable rules regarding the recovery of capital simply do not
apply any longer," said Theodore Vogel, vice president and tax counsel for
DTE Energy Co , a member of the industry alliance.

"Investors will demand a return of, and a higher return on, their investments
in building and maintaining power plants over a much shorter period of time,"
he said.

Some 24 states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws to open their
retail markets to competition. Wholesale markets have been gradually
deregulated by the federal government.

Vogel said demand for power is great and growing, noting that 16 percent of
U.S. energy consumption could be attributed to increases in information
technology and telecommunications.

U.S. demand for power is expected to grow at a rate of more than 5 percent a
year, he said.

New supply is lagging, however, notably in states where deregulation has seen
consumers pay market rates for power for the first time, like in California,
where price caps had to be introduced in San Diego this summer after electric
bills tripled and caused a public outcry.

"Congress should legislate incentives to encourage the construction of new or
more efficient electric generation facilities," Vogel said.

The Edison Electric Institute is the trade group for the nation's
shareholder-owned electric utilities.

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 99

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.comor by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Are you kidding? It is Columbus day-- there is no one to be found at the PUC.

	Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
	10/09/2000 10:57 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas

Greetings:
Any word about whether the PUC bought our proposal?
Best,
Jeff


The unit on this deal is Las Vegas Cogeneration - and I asked Les to start
entering the specific unit in the comments section of unit-contingent deals.
Let me know if he does or does not.....

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/29/2001 03:36 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #564610

This is a unit contingent deal.  We have been told that we have to have the
unit name to include in the confirmation when we confirm these deals.  Can
you have the traders add the unit name in the comment section whe they do
unit contingent deals?

Thanks!


Andrea,

If I left anything out, please let me know.  Also, we have an office in
Chicago and they are looking for an Analyst also.  I have some
responsibilities for the Chicago region as well as the West region here in
the Houston office.  Richard Tomaski (312-541-1231) is the lead trader in the
Chicago office and I told him I would mention this request to you.  Will you
please call him at your convenience so he can elaborate on the situation.
Thanks.

DG    3-9573

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Andrea Richards @ ENRON                           12/06/2000 09:06 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Analyst Needs Assessment Form

Darron, per my conversation to you this morning, please complete the attached
"Needs Assessment Form " and return to me so that I may forward resumes to
you of candidates that fit your need.

Thanks!
Andrea
x36499
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Richards/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000
09:05 AM ---------------------------

Shelly Jones@ECT
12/05/2000 06:32 PM
To: Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Richards/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Analyst Recruiting

for you
---------------------- Forwarded by Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 06:32
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           12/04/2000 09:34 AM

To: Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Analyst Recruiting

Shelly,

I am looking for an Analyst to fill a position in Gas Risk Management.  I am
the West Desk Controller and report to Jeff Gossett.  I think a Book
Administrator role is a good position for an Analyst.  We have had success in
with Analysts in our group.  I think it presents a good opportunity for them
as well.  Please let me know how I can get on a list to talk with potential
candidates.  I am ignorant of the process, so if I am presuming something
incorrect, I would appreciate info on how this is supposed to work.  Thanks
for your help.

DG    3-9573


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  System
Expense Report Name: MW112801
Report Total: $127.42
Amount Due Employee: $127.42
Amount Approved: $127.42
Amount Paid: $127.42
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000
09:49 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Tommy J Yanowski                           09/19/2000 01:03 PM

To: Cheryl Oliver
cc: Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Geoff
Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colin Tonks/LON/ECT@ECT, Yan Wang/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Hanz, Peggy Alix, Scott Mills, Dave Nommensen, Diane Niestrath, Donna Greif,
Beth Perlman, Cade Burks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heather A Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Madhup Kumar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bryan
Lari/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Transport Capacity Projects - Kickoff Meeting

Most of you are aware that there are several projects on the table dealing
with Gas Transportation Capacity information.  On Monday, the 25th,  Russell
Long a Business Analyst with over 15 years of business and IT experience will
be joining Enron and will be assigned to help get these projects jump started
and provide coordination across the projects.  I'd like to get together on
Tuesday the 26th to present and discuss the following:

High Level Combined Project Plan
Overall Project Coordination & Documentation
Individual Project Leads and Team Members
Major Issues and Questions

It is probably not critical that everyone be able to attend as I can follow
follow up later with those that can't make the meeting and I want to get
started ASAP.  In the mean time feel free to contact me if you have any
questions.  Thanks!  -  Tommy

Cheryl:  Please set up the meeting referenced above and invite the people
address on this memo.  At a minimum I'd like to have Hunter, Colleen, Bhavna,
Colin, Scott, Dave, Chris Gaskill, Chris Hanz and Cade at the meeting.  I'd
like to meet on Tuesday the 26th if possible.  Thanks!


eSource presents Free Global Energy Markets Presentation:

June. 5 	 9:00 -  9:30 AM	EB 5C2
June. 5 	 10:00 -  10:30 AM 	EB 5C2

Global Energy Markets
Global Energy Markets is an information service that gives you access to updated information and analysis whenever you need it.

Global Energy Markets provides many different news feeds and data sources in one service.  In addition, Global Energy Markets provides useful online databases for finding articles, projects and companies.

Each service is available by global region.  Services include the Americas, Asia-Pacific, Europe/CIS and the Middle East.  Each service includes four key modules.

The first core module is the energy news.  The news comes from Reuters, Dow Jones, Energy24x, BBC, AP, AFP, and others.  This is an all-in-one regional news service.  The other three modules are useful databases for finding news articles, project information and companies.  The second module is the Global Energy Projects Database.  The third module is the Global Energy News Archive.  The fourth is the Energy Companies Directory.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/globalenergymarkets.pdf

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928
No Shows will be charged $50.00
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


cool


Project GEM wants to hear from you!!!  Your workstation has recently been
upgraded to Windows 2000.  Our goal is to establish a common global
infrastructure that provides you with a stable and robust computing platform
for emerging technologies.  This innovation through standardization also
validates Enron,s status as an &Innovative Technology Leader8.  Additionally,
we are committed to providing the highest standard of customer service,
resolving IT issues promptly and professionally, while exceeding the customer,
s expectations.  Your feedback is key to our success in knowing how well we
have performed in meeting these goals as well as where we need to improve for
future upgrades.  Please help us with this process by taking a few minutes to
complete this survey about your recent experience with the Windows 2000
upgrade.

Please click   GEM Survey

Thanks in advance for your participation.
Sorry for the earlier problem.


Tana:

In follow up to my email to Mike Haney, I failed to put a footer on the PW
NDA.  All of my NDA's are located in my directory in the
EnronOnline/Confidentiality Agreements sub-files.  The PWNDAFinal is the
clean revised version of this document.

Leslie


Serge,

That was sent to you yesterday morning.  I guess you didn't get it?


On September 24, 2001, Alice gave each of you a list of your outstanding accounts receivable
	back to January, 1998.  In meeting with Alice today, I understand, we have NOT cleaned up very
	many of these issues.

	Alice will be getting with each one of you AGAIN to review your accounts.  My expectation is
	that there has been some clean up activity before Performance Reviews at which time I will
	ask Alice for an update.  Alice, Raetta and Larry are all available as needed to help you in
	this effort.

	All clean up should be completed by December 31, 2001.


See attached.


From our end, we would like to have the direct reference to the specific
confirm.  I know it is a little more hassle, but it works better for us
politically.

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 05/01/01 01:14PM >>>
Dick:

I never heard back from you regarding my email of 4/18/01.  I had asked if
you would mind revising the forms of certificate which we will attach to
each trade confirmation.

We would appreciate revisions to the April 12, 2001 certificates.  This
will be the format for all future transactions.

Please send revisions to Kimberly Hundl.  Her phone number is (713)
853-1647 and fax if (713) 646-2443.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 03:07 PM -----

                    Sara
                    Shackleton           To:     "Dick D VARNER"
<Dick.Varner@EWEB.Eugene.OR.US>@ENRON
                                         cc:     Kimberly
Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron
                    04/18/2001           Subject:     Re: Representations for
ISDA Transaction(Document link: Sara
                    10:57 AM             Shackleton)

Dick:

I am suggesting a minor change to the "Power Risk Management Committee"
certificate (to eliminate the reference to the Exhibit "A").  If we leave
the reference in the certificate, you will always have to label the confirm
as Exhibit "A" and resend the completed papers to us.  Please let me know
if you are alright with this change.  If so, we ask that you please resend
the certificate dated April 12, 2001.  If you do not wish to make the
change, please resend the two certificates to which the confirmation
labeled Exhibit "A" is attached.

Please call if you have any questions.  Thanks.

(See attached file: EWEBISDA Confirm RepresentationsR1.doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Dick D VARNER"
                    <Dick.Varner@EWEB.Eug        To:
<Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    ene.OR.US>                   cc:
<Holli.Krebs@enron.com>
                                                 Subject:     Re:
Representations for ISDA Transaction
                    04/12/2001 07:00 PM

Thanks, Sara.  No problem making the changes.

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 04/12/01 01:56PM >>>

Dick:

Attached are my comments to the certificates.  We will need to attach the
form of confirmation to be certain that each particular transaction is
authorized.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

(See attached file: EWEBISDA Confirm RepresentationsR1.doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Dick D VARNER"
                    <Dick.Varner@EWEB.Eug        To:
<sara.shackleton@enron.com>
                    ene.OR.US>                   cc:
<Holli.Krebs@enron.com>, "Bert I DUNN"

<Bert.Dunn@EWEB.Eugene.OR.US>
                    04/12/2001 11:09 AM          Subject:
Representations for ISDA Transaction

Attached are drafts of two certificates which I believe will satisfy you
needs.  Please get back to me with any comments.

(See attached file: ISDA Confirm Representations)


OR DA FOOL

-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:49 AM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: QLGC

you da man!

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Chet Fenner (E-mail)
Subject: QLGC

pulled the trigger on the march 45puts. we will see

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Our Credit Dept. normally handles the distribution of financial information
to counterparties.  Tanya Rohauer has agreed to look into this.

	Michelle Cash
	07/19/2000 01:53 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: FW: Enron North America (KMM13785C0KM)

Julia and Mark,

Sharon Butcher forwarded this email to me for processing.  I assume that one
of you would be able to direct it from here.

Thanks a lot.

Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 01:52
PM ---------------------------

Sharon Butcher@ENRON
07/19/2000 12:57 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Enron North America (KMM13785C0KM)

Dear Michelle:  Please see below.  I believe that you or someone from ENA
Legal should respond to this request.  Thanks.  Sharon
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron on 07/19/2000
12:56 PM ---------------------------

webmaster@enron.com on 07/18/2000 04:27:49 PM
To: sbutche@enron
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Enron North America  (KMM13785C0KM)

Please respond directly to Adrian.James@CreditLyonnais.co.uk

Thank you.

--
Webmaster                           Enron Corp.
http://www.enron.com/               1400 Smith Street
mailto:webmaster@enron.com          Houston, Texas 77002

----------
From: "James, Adrian" <Adrian.James@CreditLyonnais.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 15:54:09 +0100
To: "'webmaster@enron.com'" <webmaster@enron.com>
Subject: Enron North America

Dear Sir / Madam

I am seeing financial information on the legal entity Enron North
America.
CLR currently has swap limits with Enron and requires this information
for
annual review purposes

Adrian James
Credit Lyonnais Rouse Limited
Credit Lyonnais Group (UK)
Tel. 020 7214 6569
Fax. 020 7638 0384
E-mail: adrian.james@creditlyonnais.co.uk

************************************************************************
*
The information in this internet E-mail is confidential and is intended
solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it
by anyone else is unauthorized. Any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
Credit Lyonnais or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended
recipient please contact  postmaster@creditlyonnais.co.uk

************************************************************************
*


You're welcome!

	Tana Jones
	05/16/2001 01:25 PM

		 To: Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Amazing Kitten

I heard about this kitty on the news but the didn't have any pictures.
Thanks for forwarding it on!

	Becky Spencer
	05/16/2001 11:42 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Sandra R McNichols/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan
Skarness/Enron@EnronXGate, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha
Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Nita Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron,
Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Amazing Kitten

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/metropolitan/909812


And the nominees are (envelope please):

Risk assessment - Fiona Grant

Southern Cone - Hennemeyer

Japan - Philip Davies

Resource Allocation - Doug Wood

Market structure - Dawson (chair, as noted)

Global Standards - Alfredo Huertas

Rates and Tariffs - Kyran Hanks

International Support -  Schroeder (me)

WTO - Peter Styles

Information Resources - Stephen Jones

I will, also, be liaising regularly with each of the people, and feeding my
own thoughts into each of the working groups through the assigned person.
mcs

Maureen McVicker@EES
14/12/99 21:44
To: SK DIR REPORTS CONF CALL
cc: SK DIR REP CONF CALL ASST

Subject: WORKING GROUP LISTS

Just FYI - here is a list of the Working Groups

Risk assessment and management (Steffes)

Southern Cone (Bestard)

Japan (O'Day)

Resource allocation (Shapiro)

Market structure (Dawson?)

Global standards (Brown)

Rates and tariffs (Kingerski)

International support for
EES (Kingerski)
ECI (Bolton)
EWC (Boyd)

WTO (Hillings)

Information Resources (Charvel)


Attached is Rod's draft opinion for David.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 16:18:14 -0500
From: "Michelle Blackstock" <mblackst@brunini.com>
To: "Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com>
Subject: Form of Opinion of Hunt and Ross
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: application/x-WordPerfect6.1
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="enron power.wpd"
Content-Description: WordPerfect 6.1

 - enron power.wpd


hey jay!
I didn't end up going to texas for financil reasons. amanda and i did just
get back from colorado visiting some friends for spring break. it was a good
time. i'm moving to florida for an internship in may when classes are over.
i'll be living with nate and tiff. i'm really excited about that. then i
come back here in november and graduate and move into the real world. how's
your job going? classes are pretty easy this semester so i've been having
fun, but i have a big test tomorrow, so better get back to studying. love,
your beautiful cousin natalie
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron on 09/07/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

"Karkour, Randa" <Randa.Karkour@COMPAQ.com> on 09/07/2000 09:01:04 AM
To: "'Agheb (E-mail)" <Agheb@aol.com>, "Leila Mankarious (E-mail)"
<Leila_Mankarious@mhhs.org>, "'Marymankarious (E-mail)"
<marymankarious@aol.com>, "Michelle lokay (E-mail)" <mlokay@enron.com>, "Ramy
Mankarious (E-mail)" <Mankarious@aol.com>
cc:

Subject: Egyptian Festival

 <<Egyptian Festival.url>>

 http://www.egyptianfestival.com/

 - Egyptian Festival.url


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2000 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread33.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread33.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread33.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack33.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack33.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Donna,

			Tony and I will participate in tomorrow's meeting. We will be in my office (extension 35269). Thanks.


This is a Return Receipt for the mail that you sent to
rogertan@swbell.net.

Note: this Return Receipt only acknowledges that the message was
displayed on the recipient's machine. There is no guarantee that the
content has been read or understood.

 - C.DTF
Return-path: <Peter.F.Keavey@enron.com>
Delivery-receipt-to: "Keavey, Peter F." <Peter.F.Keavey@ENRON.com>
Disposition-notification-to: "Keavey, Peter F."
<Peter.F.Keavey@ENRON.com>
Received: from mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta1-pr.rcsntx.swbell.net)
 by sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLD007456VPHB@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 rogertan@sims-ms-daemon; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:18:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.ngigpi.com ([205.252.36.66]) by
mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLD0076V6M3IL@mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 rogertan@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:10:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com
[192.152.140.9])
 by mail.ngigpi.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA24373 for
 <prices@intelligencepress.com>; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:30:21 -0400
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw03p.corp.enron.com
[192.168.110.110])
 by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08)
 with ESMTP id f9HJFc320983 for <prices@intelligencepress.com>; Wed,
 17 Oct 2001 14:15:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified)
 by corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1)
 with SMTP id <T56a76d0f2bc0a86e6e650@corp.enron.com>; Wed,
 17 Oct 2001 14:15:29 -0500
Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.40])
 by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
Wed,
 17 Oct 2001 14:15:29 -0500
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:15:06 -0500
From: "Keavey, Peter F." <Peter.F.Keavey@enron.com>
To: "Iferc1 (E-mail)" <kelley_doolan@mcgraw-hill.com>,
 "Iferc2 (E-mail)" <liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com>,
 "Gas Daily (E-mail)" <gas_daily@ftenergy.com>,
 "Dowjones1 (E-mail)" <dina.omeara@dowjones.com>,
 "Dowjones2 (E-mail)" <john.edmiston@dowjones.com>,
 "NGI (E-mail)" <prices@intelligencepress.com>
Message-id:
 <3891F8E98C93214B9E3E913CB7BF600220DBAA@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed ;
 boundary="{245D7C26-D018-4526-9E81-BAE01BA939C1}"
Content-description: Daily Price Sheet.xls
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Thread-Index: AcFXQAf1qRBY0FqERvW0Fs7E3B6MCA==
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2001 19:15:29.0501 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[1599D0D0:01C15740]
X-UIDL: 3a93eab20000297b


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
05:28 PM ---------------------------

Osman Sezgen@EES
04/04/2001 04:33 PM
To: Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: IAM Projects-Discounting

Krishna,

Here is my working paper on the issue. We actually applied the alternative
method
(put value) to the calculation of premium for managing the "liquidation
value" curves.

I am working with the desk to get a list of all the projects we have with
information about
the technology class, region, volume etc. Shortly we will be able to apply
these methodologies
and test them.

Osman


Based on what we heard from FERC last week, we should:

Be taking a leadership role in either EPSA, WPTF, our whichever entity thinks
most like Enron and has the largest number of members.
Decide the five most important issues we want FERC to address and try to work
on these issues through that group.
I think Joe should be spearheading this effort.
Accordingly, I think it is most appropriate to work on things like responding
to the Joskow/Hogan papers through that group.

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 12/11/2000 10:02 AM CST
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Analysis of Joskow / Hogan Papers

Having read the Hogan paper, I think that the "academic" community is
somewhat divided on this issue.  If we want to move forward on the issues
Joskow addresses, I would recommend that EPSA be the vehicle.  The entire
marketer / generator community needs to counter.

What do people think about seeking activity through EPSA, WPTF, and/or IEP of
CA  to push back on the studies and analysis especially after the Dec 13
Order?  I don't think that the discussions will be ending very soon.

Jim

	Alan Comnes@ECT
	12/07/2000 03:07 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT
		 Subject: Re: Analysis of Joskow / Hogan Papers

The Joskow/Kahn paper raises two issues:  price above cost  and witholding.

Enron obviously has concerns with the "price above cost" analysis.  I drafted
some specific concerns and put them into a draft to Enron's reponse to Hoeker
Question 1.  Although the detail was dropped in the final draft, the basic
technical concerns were laid out there. To really rebut Joskow/Kahn would
take considerable work.  Jeff D's idea was to write a paper that raised
issues and indicated how complicated a "correct" response would  be.

The Joskow/Kahn withholding section has recieved criticism from the ISO so I
am not sure Enron needs to respond to that.

I think my bottom line now is that the debate at FERC will soon be over or
enter a new stage on the 13th.  As far as how a response would help us in
California, I think requires a discussion with Jeff.

Alan

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 12/05/2000 07:22 PM CST
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Analysis of Joskow / Hogan Papers

Alan --

Before we bring in Seabron Adamson to do some analysis, I'd like your read of
the Joskow and Hogan papers.   When we have our understanding straight, let's
talk.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 12/05/2000 07:20 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/30/2000 11:49 AM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: From Today's Electricity Daily

FYI. In bizarre times, help can sometimes come from bizarre places.  Granted,
we're likely to disagree strongly with Hogan's continued obsession with
Poolco, but the discussion in his paper regarding market power may be
helpful---I've read the Joskow paper, but haven't yet had a chance to review
the Hogan piece.

Steve and I discussed the need to do a focused assessment of the Joskow/Kahn
"analysis"  (remember it's Ed Kahn, not Alfred Kahn).  Seems that it would be
very useful to fold into that analysis any useful stuff on market power
included in the paper done by Hogan & Co.  If, in the end, there ain't
nothing useful, so be it.  But seems like there's little downside to
exploring it.

Jim, my understanding is that Alan is already working with the fundamentals
folks on the Portland desk to deconstruct the Joskow paper.  Might want to
include the Hogan paper in those discussions and might also be useful to pull
Seabron Adamson into the thinking, too.  Ultimately, may be preferable to
have any assessment of Joskow and/or Hogan to come from economists, rather
than directly from us.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 11:38 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	11/30/2000 11:29 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <BillR@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <glwaas@calpx.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>,
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <KEWH@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
<foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
<Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com>, <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
<Roger.Pelote@Williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: From Today's Electricity Daily

Has FERC Gone Far Enough in California?
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission isn't going far enough in its
attempt to reform the California wholesale electric market, according to a
paper by three prominent economists done for San Diego Gas and Electric. The
paper by John D. Chandley, Scott M. Harvey, and William W. Hogan argues that
FERC should first end the artificial separation that divides the California
Power Exchange and the California Independent System Operator, rather than
worrying about the governance of the two institutions.
"The change in governance may help," says the paper - "Electricity Market
Reform in California" - "but it is not likely to be decisive in the near
term. Explicit guidance from the commission regarding the nature and
trajectory of reforms will be essential if market reform is to be
accomplished within an acceptable time frame." Hogan, of the Kennedy School
of Government, has been writing since 1995 in opposition to California's
market separation.
Also, argues the paper, freeing the California utilities to engage in forward
contracting is no panacea. "The expectation that merely allowing utilities to
participate in forward contracting necessarily would be the solution to high
prices is problematic and not supported by the commission's staff report,"
says the analysis, adding that "putting pressure on buyers to sign contracts
in the present environment may make things worse." If the underlying problem
in California is high cost and low capacity, requiring forward contracting
could harm not only California but also the entire Western U.S. electric
system.
FERC's $150 so-called "soft cap" is a wild card that has the three economists
scratching their heads. "It does not appear in the staff report and there is
little critical analysis of their implications, other than the discussion of
Commissioner [Curt] Hebert." If the intent of the soft cap is to move toward
cost justification for bids above $150/MWh, then FERC is headed into an
administrative morass "that would rival those under wellhead price controls
in the natural gas industry."
If, on the other hand, the soft cap is "truly soft" and would only require
some paper work at FERC and the possibility of a refund if the price is
eventually deemed not just and reasonable, "there might be little impact on
consumer prices (particularly if the principal sources of those high prices
are high costs and regional capacity shortages rather than the exercise of
market power). Even so, the proposal might serve to deter entry and new
investments, thus combining the worst of both worlds, high consumer prices
and little or no new investment."
FERC's proposed order in California also demonstrates confusion about just
what constitutes market power. The paper cites the proposed order's lawyerly,
obfuscatory conclusion that "while this record does not support findings of
specific exercises of market power, and while we are not able to reach
definite conclusions about the actions of individual sellers, there is clear
evidence that in California market structure and rules provide the
opportunity for sellers to exercise market power when supply is tight and can
result in unjust and unreasonable rates under the [Federal Power Act]." The
economists note, "In this regard, the debate is confused because we are
dancing around the words where the truth may be hard to face."
In the case of California, say the economists, there is no evidence of market
power. Even the practice of generators avoiding the day-ahead market in favor
of the real-time market "is a response to bad market design and pricing
incentives (including price caps), but does not demonstrate the exercise of
market power." Nor is bidding above marginal cost necessarily an exercise of
market power, they add. "The distinction between direct marginal cost and
opportunity cost is sometimes lost in the discussion. Hence, a competitive
bidder whose direct cost of generation is $40 but who could sell the same
energy outside California for $100 should bid no less than $100. This would
not be an exercise of market power."


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 5:32 PM
To:	Fuller, Dave
Cc:	Sherman, Cris; Gruesen, Karen; Baldridge, Don; Daniel, Shonnie
Subject:	Final Docs.

Mark and Dave,  Please print out two copies of each and execute all four.  The closing statements need to be printed on ENA Letterhead.  Sign all four and fax to Don Baldridge.  Put all four originals in the Fedex to me for initial.  I have asked Don to obtain execution of NBP's side and fax back to me.  Let me know if you have any questions.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/08/2001 09:18
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/02/2001 02:20 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Citibank Fees

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/02/2001 02:20
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/02/2001 02:05:34 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>,
"'fred.mitro@enron.com'" <fred.mitro@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: FW: Citibank Fees

Kay:

See the attached Citibank Schedule of Fees letter agreement.  Can ENA
provide wiring instructions for insertion into the Escrow Agreements.  Thank
you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Paradee, Lari [mailto:Lparade@INTERGEN.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 1:58 PM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Cc: 'Lawrence, Estelle A'
Subject: FW: Citibank Fees

Carolyn,

Happy New Year!

Here is the Citibank Schedule of Fees updated with the "Waived for initial
setup" and the "F." in Ben's name.

Do you have the wiring instructions yet so I can put them in the escrow
documents and circulate those docs as final??

Thanks,
 Lari

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Steward, Shelly
Sent:   Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:24 AM
To:     Paradee, Lari
Subject:        Citibank Fees

Good Morning Lari!

<<Citibank Schedule of Fees.doc>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Citibank Schedule of Fees.doc


Attached please find a PowerPoint file for the April 24, 2001 BAWG
presentation for the BIC.

Wes Yeomans

     (See attached file: bawg0401.ppt)

 - bawg0401.ppt


No sound.  only picture,

>>
>>
>>
>>        Think again.  Download
>>
>
>

 - Assholes.jpg


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/27/2001>, published as of 11/27/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


All

I have received a few notes about this since this one but I will try to
respond to all questions here. Please see below responses in RED:

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           08/03/2000 17:54

To: Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Transitional Assignments

Please note this is confidential at this point!

To document what we discussed by phone, I met with Sally Beck and Brent Price
today.  Fernley Dyson has a vacancy that he is attempting to fill, but it may
be 3 to 6 months before the position is up and running.  To accomplish the
need in the meantime, Sally and Brent have agreed to share the duties as
follows:

Brent - April 1 to June 15
Sally - June 16 to August 15

They are traveling to the UK the week of 3/20 and would like to schedule some
time with you on either Monday afternoon or Wednesday.  Please let us know
what is good for you.
I have free time on the morning of the 20th. I will book out a room from
11-12am in HR. Please let me know if this is a problem.

Issues:

Housing - They will each be bringing their families with them (Brent - spouse
and 2 small children - the baby will need a crib; Sally - husband and 3
children - ages 15, 11 and 2).  I understand that the houses which have been
vacated due to returning expats have all been filled, so can you have someone
arrange for corporate housing that will accommodate them? I think the best
way to go here is for us to use serviced apartments as it will be very
difficult to find a lease for such a short period for this type of
accommodation. My assistant, Lisa, has put a call in to a service who can
help us find serviced accommodation in South Kensington/Chelsea area or in
Dolphin Square where we have people now who are very satisfied. Is there a
reason you are partial to South Kensington/Chelsea? What if we find
accommodation in another nice area of London within a short commute to the
office? When I have some options, I will let you know, probably on Monday.

Immigration - Due to the fact that they will be traveling back and forth and
have made trips already, I feel it would be best to apply for work permits
versus using the visa waiver.  I have sent them the forms and requested that
Brent complete his and file immediately to increase chances of getting his
sometime shortly after he arrives in the UK.  I have informed him that he
should arrive without his family if the permit has not been received by April
1. Brent's work permit will be submitted today and we may receive if before
April 1st, but it is unlikely. The way it works for this is as follows: Brent
will receive the work permit from us and if he is here, he will have to leave
the UK and enter with the work permit for it to be validated. If his family
are in Houston, they will need to receive entry clearance in the US prior to
arriving in the UK. This takes approx 7 working days and they will require
either Brent's original passport and work permit or a certified copy of each
along with other things such as marriage and birth certificates. If Brent
decides to bring his family with him to London prior to receiving the work
permit, they must say they are coming on a vacation for a short period of
time and have a return ticket to back it up. Once the permit is received, the
family can either travel back to Houston and submit the entry clearance visas
there or they can all travel to Amsterdam where they are currenlty issuing
entry clearance without a problem. There is always a small element of risk in
going to Amsterdam, however, as do not have to issue the stamps there, they
just do it because they are nice! Work permits are arriving approx 4 weeks
from date of submission. We can discuss all of this on the 20th.

Tax - Please confirm whether PAYE will need to be paid for them during the
short term assignment and then reclaimed through a treaty benefit. PAYE is
due after 60 days; however, if Brent and Sally are really only going to be
here for approx 75 days, I am not going to inform the Revenue that they are
here. If this extends beyond the set time, we can look at options but the
only responsiblility that Brent and Sally will have is to ensure they
complete the tax organiser in order for us to get the tax back. Also, as we
would have to apply the treaty here, we need to ensure the salary costs stay
in Houston. Jane, have you discussed this point?

Benefits - I have suggested that they remain on US domestic payroll and
benefits and, if medical claims arise that exceed what they would have spent
in the US, they may claim the excess on the expense report. Agreed.

Per diem - We need to discuss the appropriate amount based on family size.
Jane, please call me to discuss. I have left you a message, thanks

Let me know of any other issues we need to address.  As always, I appreciate
your help.

Jane


Please open the attached file to read the complete text of the following
items:

08:11AM EDT  7-JUN-01 UBS WARBURG (US) (YOUNG, DON) HWP
HEWLETT PACKARD: MORE REALISTIC OUTLOOK THIS TIME

07:48AM EDT  7-JUN-01 GERARD KLAUER MATTISON & CO. (BAILEY, D.) CPQ
THE BEAR CASE

04:43AM EDT  7-JUN-01 J.P. MORGAN (WILLIAM A. LEWIS) CPQ ORCL EMC NTAP
NETWORKED STORAGE BUS TOUR HIGHLIGHTS

09:27AM EDT  7-JUN-01 WIT SOUNDVIEW (GARY HELMIG) EMC
EMC (EMC) COMPANY UPDATE JUNE 7, 2001

07:19AM EDT  7-JUN-01 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY (JOHN B. JONES JR.) HWP
HWP: END MARKETS SOFTNING; REDUCING REVENUE AND EPS ESTIMATES

07:33AM EDT  7-JUN-01 CIBC WORLD MARKETS CORP. (QUINN BOLTON) INTC
INTC: EXPECT INTC TO LOWER GUIDANCE ON MID-QUARTER UPDATE CONF. CALL

 <<6.07.01 Analyst Reports.doc>>
The analyst reports provided are reports prepared by independent analysts
who monitor and track Compaq's performance.  These reports are not prepared
by or at the direction of Compaq and as a result, Compaq is not endorsing or
verifying the information contained in these reports or endorsing any of
these analysts.   These reports are being provided solely for business
reasons and as a result, do not distribute these reports to other
individuals outside of Compaq.  If other individuals are interested in
receiving the reports provided herein, please contact Elizabeth Davis in
Compaq's Investor Relations Department at elizabeth.davis@compaq.com.

Elizabeth Davis
Compaq - Investor Relations
Research Analyst
281-518-4289

 - 6.07.01 Analyst Reports.doc


Don't mess with Texas.....especially the women!

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/metropolitan/637152


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041621.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 21 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


[IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   Check out the great rates from Discover(R).  See below to learn how you can get a subscription to AlumniAccess FREE.   CCGBLU00001066   Discover is back in the AlumniAccess Sponsor Program! If you would like to get a free AlumniAccess membership when you qualify for a Discover card, click here  to sign up through our AlumniAccess subscription registration and choose the "Get AlumniAccess Free" option.   If you would like to stop receiving our Deal of the Week, please change your email settings on HighSchoolAlumni.com .


FROM SHONNIE DANIEL:

Just a reminder that there will be a meeting this morning at 11:15 in 38C2
regarding the Denver Projects.  See you there.


John,

I have received your message regarding Mike Roberts. I could not
agree more. Mike deserves to be compensated for his exceptional
contribution.

Additional recommendation. I think that all weather forecasting support
should be consolidated under Mike (including the weather guys supporting
power trading). In my view, it was a mistake to remove Mike from
power support. It would also mean a lot to him personally.

Vince


You blew me off!  Are you in town?  I tried your phone but it's busy.  df


Cheryl, I was in your store on 9/23/00 and saw some Bernhardt furniture I am
interested in.  It is the Paris Collection Dining Table and Chairs and the
numbers are:

346-242  Table
346-244  Base
346-502  Air Chair (4)
346-501  Side Chair

Also I am interested in one of the two beds in the Paris Collection:

346-435  Sleigh Bed 5-0

346-527  Metal Canopy 5-0
346-457  Poster Bed 5-0
346-416  Poster Headboard 4-6 thru 5-0

On the second bed I am not sure if you need all three pieces or not so it
would help if you could tell me what is the difference between the three
pieces.  Finally, I am interested in an amroire and chest of draws (there are
several depending if I go with a granite top or not):
346-144  Armoire
346-237  Right Stone Top
346-236  Right Bachelor's Chest Base
346-235  Right Bachelor'e Chest
346-042  Dressing Chest
346-044  Dressing Chest Stone Top
346-043  Dressing Chest Base

I look forward to hearing from you tomorrow.  If it is easier you can email
me with the prices and then call to go over the info (instead of having to
give 15 prices).  My work number is 713-853-5933.

Thanks,

Martin Cuilla


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

March 16, 2001 5:00pm through March 19, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  Corp Exchange/Outlook
Time:  Fri 3/16/2001 at  5:15:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/16/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/16/2001 at  3:15:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/16/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/16/2001 at  11:15:00 PM London thru Sat 3/17/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Chassis swap of NAHOU-MSMSW03V
Environments Impacted:  Users-Corp Exchange/Outlook
Purpose: Problems with the current Hardware.  After the chassis sawp,  will
be testing fail over from one cluster node to the other and for any other
problems or issues.
Backout: NA
Contact(s):  Dalak Malik    713-345-8219

MARKET DATA:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:   ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/16/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/16/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/16/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/16/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/17/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 3/17/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Unix O/S patch upgrades and FDDI migration on servers
Environments Impacted:  All Development Groups. Servers:  Fava, Navy, Europa,
Electron, Spectra, Genesis, Sdv1tib1
Purpose: Stability
Backout: Reinstall previous patch level.
Contact(s):  Wilford Stevens    713-853-7564
  Lakshminarasimhan Srinivasan    713-345-8490

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/17/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 3/18/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 3/17/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Sat  3/17/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/17/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sun 3/18/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Install Unix O/S Patches and FDDI migration
Environments Impacted:  All Development Groups. Servers:  Eclipse, Sunray,
Madrdid, Quark, Modena
Purpose: Stability
Backout: Reinstall previous patch version
Contact(s):  Wilford Stevens    713-853-7564
  Lakshminarasimhan Srinivasan    713-345-8490

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


We have tentatively reached an arrangement with Duke regarding the repair work.  If closing takes place prior to completion of the repair work, Duke will assume control of the repairs and Enron will continue to pay actual invoices received in connection with the repair work so long as they are consistent with the agreed upon scope of work.

Currently the estimated costs are $1.45 Million (these have increased slightly from our prior conversations because of new problems uncovered when the generator was opened up).  We are reasonably certain that no further material problems should arise in the completion of the work and that the estimated cost is reasonable static.

On the insurance claim related to this work, I understand that the insurance company is balking at paying two components of the repair work which will likely (if this is their final, unchallenged position) result in the deductible exceeding the loss payable (i.e. no insurance proceeds payable to ENA).

Please feel free to call with any questions.

Stuart


The Lowest

Life Insurance Quotes

Without the Hassle!

Compare rates from the nation's top Life Insurance companies

COMPARE YOUR CURRENT COVERAGE <http://www.i-european.org/insurance.html>
to these sample 10-year level term monthly premiums
(20 year, 30 year and smoker rates also available)

	$250,000	 $500,000	 $1,000,000
Age	 Male	 Female	 Male	 Female	 Male	 Female
30	 $12	 $11	 $19	 $15	 $31	 $27
40	 $15	 $13	 $26	 $21	 $38	 $37
50	 $32	 $24	 $59	 $43	 $107	 $78
60	 $75	 $46	 $134	 $87	 $259	 $161

Click Here to Compare! <http://www.i-european.org/insurance.html>
It's fast, easy and FREE!

  _____

*All quotes shown are from insurance companies rated A-, A, A+ or A++ by A.M. Best Company (a registered rating service) and include all fees and commissions.
Actual premiums and coverage availability will vary depending upon age, sex, state availability, health history and recent tobacco usage.

(c) 2001. All rights reserved (ST) This email has been screened and filtered by the a third party removal system. Client I.D. # 602142
If you wish to remove your email address from this mailing please send a email to
"removeme@i-european.org" with the word "remove" in the subject line


Sweetie, what happened?  How'd you hurt your back?  So sorry.  And SO sorry that this isn't working out for anyone.  I really wanted to see you guys and REALLY wanted to ride.  Another day, I guess.  Take care of that back.  Herniated disks are bad, so take care.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Madeleine Todd [mailto:Madeleine@madeleinetodd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 1:23 PM
To: afinch@iasco.com; Dasovich, Jeff; Scatena, Pat;
mcgee.nora@epamail.epa.gov; jeff_walker@i2.com; cwfinch@pacbell.net;
Luis Pine (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Mendocino Ride
Importance: High

Hey gang-
Just back from the doctors and he said "do not go riding this weekend".
I am terribly disappointed but it wouldn't be wise. I don't have any
broken bones and it doesn't appear that I have a herniated disk--at this
point just a lumbar strain but he is afraid it will get worse if I ride.
I am sorry for the inconvenience and I will send Lari a separate email.
I hope the trip is wonderful. Please share the details.
Madeleine

-----Original Message-----
From: Amy Gustafson Finch [mailto:afinch@iasco.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:41 PM
To: 'Dasovich, Jeff'; 'Scatena, Pat'; Madeleine Todd;
mcgee.nora@epamail.epa.gov; jeff_walker@i2.com; cwfinch@pacbell.net;
'Luis Pine (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Mendocino Ride

Hi all,

Sorry that some of you won't be making it to Mendocino.  I talked to
Lari's
assistant Cynthia and they are not planning to exact cancellation
charges.
Cal and I are still planning an all-day ride on Saturday, and Pat and
Nora
will be joining us on Sunday for a four-hour beach ride.  Would love for
any
of you who are "on the fence" to join us for both days.  The Ranch would
like to know by Wednesday if possible.

Amy

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 8:16 AM
To: Scatena, Pat; Madeleine Todd; afinch@iasco.com;
mcgee.nora@epamail.epa.gov; jeff_walker@i2.com; cwfinch@pacbell.net;
Luis Pine (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Mendocino Ride

Dear folks:
Hope all finds you well, given the circumstances.  I would very much
like to go, but I continue to be embroiled in the energy mess and school
has started (last year!).  Turns out I'm going to have to be in Southern
California that Friday and part of Saturday for work.  I'm going to have
to cancel.  If there are any charges, please let me know.  Hope to see
all of you very soon.  Be safe.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Scatena, Pat [mailto:pat.scatena@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:03 AM
To: 'Madeleine Todd'; afinch@iasco.com; mcgee.nora@epamail.epa.gov;
jeff_walker@i2.com; Dasovich, Jeff; cwfinch@pacbell.net; Luis Pine
(E-mail)
Subject: RE: Mendocino Ride

that's really too bad, i hope you are still able to make it.  I am still
planning to go, but will definitely be riding only on Sunday and might
drive
up on Saturday instead of on Friday.  Lu, I'll call you after I talk to
Jeff
to confirm whether he's still going.
p

-----Original Message-----
From: Madeleine Todd [mailto:Madeleine@madeleinetodd.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 6:50 PM
To: afinch@iasco.com; Scatena, Pat; mcgee.nora@epamail.epa.gov;
jeff_walker@i2.com; jeff.dasovich@enron.com; cwfinch@pacbell.net; Luis
Pine (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Mendocino Ride

Hey guys--
It is my hope that you and your loved ones have not been directly
affected in the tragedy.

I assume that the trip to Mendocino is still going forward. I am not
happy to report that my lower back has gotten worse and not better since
the accident in Hawaii. Sadly, I may have to pass on Mendocino. I will
find out more this upcoming week and let you know.

If I do have to cancel I would assume we should keep the Grandma's room
for Jeff & Lu. If there are any potential cancellation charges I should
pay to Lari please let me know. I have been looking forward to this for
so long, I am sad to think of not joining all of you.

I will get back to you by Wednesday.

Madeleine

-----Original Message-----
From: Amy Gustafson Finch [mailto:afinch@iasco.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:05 PM
To: 'Scatena, Pat'; Madeleine Todd; mcgee.nora@epamail.epa.gov;
jeff_walker@i2.com; jeff.dasovich@enron.com; cwfinch@pacbell.net
Subject: RE: Mendocino Ride

Hi Group,

Need input for Lari as our ride approaches (Pat can you forward to Lu
and
ask him to reply to me).

I know some of you have ridden with Lari many times, but her scheduler
is
facilitating this process and has asked for some information.  Please
provide the following and I will batch and send to Lari:

Years riding
How often currently riding
type of riding (i.e. English lessons, dressage, trail)
type of saddle preferred
age, height and weight

Also, we initially planned on an all-day ride on Sat, and a four-hour
ride
on Sunday so we could all head back relatively early.  Lari would like
to
know where we want to ride on each day.  Nora is only riding for the
four-hour ride, and prefers the beach.  How about an all-day ride in the
redwoods on Saturday, with a four-hour beach ride on Sunday?

Amy

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Men:

Hunting season is over. It is now working season. All email threads are
gone. No one talks to one another. This is wrong.

I therefor propose man night February 28th, 2002 at some location yet to be
determined, such as Tony's mexican food...on Ella.

e.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


The Enron Building is being evacuated.  However, we will be updating this very tragic and volatile situation regularly.  Contacts:

Robert Johnston-
x39934
cell: 713-594-7995

Clay Seigle
x31504
cell: 713-875-8778

Brendan Fitzsimmons
x54763
cell: 832-455-5887

1. US is under attack.  We are in state of emergency.  Casualties are likely to be in the thousands. Two US "critical infrastructures"--transportation and finance--the cornerstones of the US economy have been severely damaged.

2. Discount all gossip.  Responsibility will be put on many groups and many groups will claim responsibility.  There are no facts at this time.

3. Nonetheless, there are a limited number of terrorist groups that could coordinate an attack with this many targets and this level of sophisticaton.  Indeed, it is likely that a state sponsor of some kind would be required to provide financial and intelligence support for such an attack.

4. It is virtually certain that these groups or countries are based in the Middle East.  It is almost equally certain that a massive US response against a Middle Eastern target is forthcoming. There will be enormous domestic political pressure on the Bush Administration for a vengeance attack. This will be at least partially offset by a reluctance to further inflame Arab radicalism in the Middle East and Persian Gulf.

5. As mentioned above, in addition to the horrendous human cost, there are economic and market consequences:

Oil- IPE and NYMEX are closed.  Oil futures will of course react strongly to the dramatic uptick in Middle Eastern uncertainty.

Equities- General flight to quality.  Investors are selling equities and putting funds into cash.  Many major brokerages and trading firms have been wiped out in the WTC collapse. It will take some time--days or weeks--for these firms to restore operations.

Currencies- Swiss Franc and US dollar will benefit from flight to quality.

Shipping- major ports and border crossing closed, surrounding areas jammed with traffic.  Impact on all commodities--steel, lumber, pulp/paper, crude/products shipments, LNG, etc.  Ships at sea will back up, affecting pipeline deliveries.  Freight impacted by road chaos in major US cities.

Metals- gold/platinum benefit from flight to quality.

We will update as soon as we get information.


Boo


Chris,

Hello from Houston.  I really enjoyed meeting with you last Saturday at your
gallery.  Your collection of work is very impressive.

I have not received your digital pictures that you were putting together but
I did talk with my wife about the Bonnard.  The Bonnard is my first choice of
all the pieces we discussed.  I found an illustration of it on the net (from
another gallery) and she liked (although - not as much as me).  I am prepared
to purchase a Bonnard and the Radiator is my first choice.  I would like to
establish a relationship and do business with your gallery and would like to
know what is your best price for the piece.  I will not shop the price around
and will make a quick decision with a credit card number.   When I get your
response and if it is competitive, I'll confirm the purchase when I pick up
the email.

Thanks,
Mike McConnell

PS - I will hold off on the others for now and when you send me the pictures
I will show them to my wife for consideration.  I am considering the Mary
Cassat as a gift for her.


I met with Ms Caplan yesterday and had a good discussion.  I was pretty
impressed with her.  The only down side is that her inability to sit for the
Texas bar is a hangup for a lawyer position.   I suggested that she also look
into getting her license in New York or D.C. as I think those jurisdictions
are less reluctant to allow non-U.S. lawyers to sit for the bar than Texas
is.  I'll talk to Mike Moran, Dot McCoppin, Britt Davis and Shelley Corman
regaring possible positions in GPG.  Have you thought about Steve Kean's
group?  They might be able to use someone like Emma.  I plan to write her in
a couple of weeks to follow up with any additional leads I've found.  Enjoyed
shootin the shit with you, as always!  DF


Executes capacity at Boston Gas.


[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums:  Forexnews Forum       Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca   J.P. Chorek   Technical Research Ltd.   Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's        Interest Rates  US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland:   1.75%  0.15%  3.25%  4.0%  1.25-2.25%        [IMAGE]   	 [IMAGE]  Japanese Forex Trading Preview January 9, 7:00 PM: EUR/$..0.8916 $/JPY..133.02 GBP/$..1.4384 $/CHF..1.6569  Japanese Forex Trading Preview by Darko Pavlovic  No key data.   USD/JPY is trading near its three years high around 133.15 boosted by fresh comments from Economic Minister Takenaka who said currency levels should be left to the markets, sparking a new yen sell. Takenaka is currently in the US and markets are looking for any indication from Washington that will tolerate further yen weakness. The yen retraced off its 3 year lows after Japan's chief government spokesman Fukuda, said the currency's 9% drop against the dollar during the past two months was   a bit rapid.'' Fukuda's comments raised speculation the government would try to slow the decline, ahead of Prime Minister Koizumi's trip to Southeast Asia. Japanese officials are in favor of a weaker yen to increase exports and help draw the economy out of recession. Officials from South Korea's Finance and Economic Ministry who expressed his discontent with the weakening in the yen because it created depression in other Asian markets. The BoJ is likely to adopt asset-backed commercial paper as a tool in its open-market operations when they meet next Tuesday and Wednesday. The BoJ wants to raise wariness about credit risk that could start to arise in late March, the end of fiscal year in Japan. A total of 22 third-sector companies went bankrupt in calendar 2001, most of them in regional tourism and leisure industries. Koizumi left Japan on Wednesday morning for a weeklong tour of five Southeast Asian nations, which include Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and Singapore and deliver a speech on Japan's Southeast Asia policy in Singapore. According to the Ministry of  Telecommunications Japan will be able to create 1.85 million jobs by 2005. Resistance is seen at 133.40 and 134.50. Support is viewed at 132.20, 131.50 and 131.0.   The euro is trading around 89.15 after falling to a one and a half week lows of 88.66 after Eurozone business climate fell to a 5-1/2 year low of -1.23 in December from -1.20 in Nov. The greater-than-expected upward revision in Q3 labor costs and earnings to 3.3% from the previous 2.7% was also cause for concern. Finally, German Chancellor Schroeder's statement that the German government would soon announce measures to promote low wage job creation without hurting deficit goals worked more to undermine the euro than shore up the currency. The single currency benefited from fall in the US stocks, which retreated into negative territory late in the trading session on a combination of rumors and a large sell-order. The Dow fell 56 points to 10094 and NASDAQ finishing down 10 points to 2044. For most of the day, equities had been boosted by Cisco's announcement that it anticipated an increase in its market share and planned to make acquisitions to diversify its product line. Upbeat outlooks from Oracle and Coach also helped lift shares. Initial support is seen at 89.0, backed by 88.80 and 88.60. Upside capped at 89.55, 89.80 and 90.0.  The Federal Reserve is planned to meet for its monetary policy meeting on January 29-30 in the peak of earnings season. While there are some bears who expect gloomy results in the first quarter compared with the previous one, other investors are bullish about the equity markets' outlook given that so far earnings expectations have been fairly optimistic.  This week's major US indicators comprise jobless claims, import and export prices, wholesale trade and PPI. Key Eurozone economic releases include Euroarea GDP, ECB monthly bulletin, German industrial production, German foreign trade, Spanish industrial production, Dutch manufacturing production, French GDP, French current account, French CPI, Dutch CPI and Spanish CPI. Highlights from Japan consist of wholesale prices, money supply and the ESRI Tokyo consumer sentiment survey. The major event of this week will be the Bank of England's monetary policy meeting on Thursday, although no rate cut is expected.     	[IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis Takenaka Leaves Little Doubt on Japan's FX Stance        Articles & Ideas  What's Next For the Euro?   A Look Back at 2001, Forex Themes for 2002       Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary   Economic Indicators   Forex Guides   Link Library      [IMAGE]
		[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]
		 This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here .


Who do we ask to set up the m:\common?  This makes the most sense to me.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zheng, Min
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:28 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Kathy
Cc:	Lee, Norman
Subject:	M:/Common/power folder
Importance:	High

Dear All,

In Enron system, M:\common\power is one of our major folder. In UBS system, it is changed to M:\power. I wonder whether we need to create a new folder:
M:\common, then move M:\power under M:\common\ and become M:\common\power just as Enron system. Otherwise, we at least need to spent a lot of time to find out and change all path pointers and fixed links of Excel application under power folder. Also, if too many files dynamic links are  messed up, we may be able to ask system team to rebuild power folder for us.

Thanks!

Min Zheng


1.  I didn't know much about ag products but Ted Murphy is trying to include
me in the loop.

2. Chris Calger says that he has aggregated his CPI positions for the west.
Can check if Dave Duran has done this for the east and try to aggregate the
position.  If you need help let me know.

John


It seems that since we've already contributed, we're invited.  Given where Davis' numbers have gone recently, Riordan's imminent announcement and potential, and the fact that the Rs have played it about as well as could be expected under the circumstances (save for Morrow, who we may want to bring up with Brulte if the lunch is attended, this could be a useful gathering.  And it doesn't require crossing the border into California, to boot.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Hedy Govenar [mailto:hgovenar@govadv.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Kaufman, Paul; Jeff Dasovich; sgovenar@govadv.com
Subject: [Fwd: Oct. 29 Lunch]

Enron gave $50k to the Rep party at Brulte and Cox's request.  If Enron
is participating, please let us know.  Also, this is a reminder that
Scott will be back in early Nov. and I will return Nov. 12th.  Behave
yourselves.  Fondly,  Hedy

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <Scott.Sadler@reliant.com>
To: theo.pahos@mirant.com, kelly@hnks.com, greg.blue@dynegy.com, rachel.king@elpaso.com, john.g.larrea@williams.com, hgovenar@govadv.com, Mark Nobili <mnobili@cal-lobby.com>, clondon@rosekindel.com
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2001 6:49:42 GMT
Subject:

This time with the attachment.

SS

(See attached file: letbetterinvite.doc)

----- Forwarded by Scott A Sadler/ADM/HouInd on 10/08/2001 11:40 PM -----

                    Scott A
                    Sadler               To:     theo.pahos@mirant.com, kelly@hnks.com, greg.blue@dynegy.com,
                                         rachel.king@elpaso.com, john.g.larrea@williams.com, hgovenar@govadv.com,
                    10/09/2001           Mark Nobili <mnobili@cal-lobby.com>, clondon@rosekindel.com
                    01:42 PM             cc:
                                         Subject:     Oct. 29 Lunch

Theo, Hedy, Anne, Greg, John, Rachel, Mark, Carl

Attached is an invitation letter from Reliant's CEO Steve Letbetter to the
CEO and President's of your company/energy client.

Jim Brulte and Dave Cox asked Reliant to host a lunch for them with energy
industry executives in Houston and we will be doing do on October 29th.
Jim and Dave will be making follow up calls to the principals.  I wanted
you each to know this was happening and see the invitation.  The financial
commitment is attached to attending the lunch but the pitch will be made to
support the Senate/Assembly Leadership account at the CA Republican Party.

This invitation is only going to energy industry executives, although there
is a possibility a few other Texas companies might be included.

Expect a call from Jeff Miller encouraging you to support attending when
asked by your client/company.

Hope to see you in Houston on the 29th.

Sadler


sep now .83 by .84


Let;s you and I chat this afternoon about getting reimburse from Oglethorpe
on Transco.


Good Morning.

WTC voicemail is down.  The link between WTC and Qwest is not working.   PGE has reported the problem at 5:50am and we are waiting to hear what's happening.

Quick reminder on what can occur when voicemail goes down and what your might experience when the link comes back up:

1) The message waiting light won't go off after you retrieve your messages. If this occurs just have the person lift the handset, hear dial tone and dial,  113. This will clear the message waiting light.

2) The message waiting light is not on and you could have a message.    Have employees check their mailbox just in case they are expecting critical messages.  The next voicemail will activate the message waiting light.

Please let me know if you have questions or concerns.


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 11/16/00 11:04 AM -----

	"Lowe, Deborah" <deborahlowe@akllp.com>
	11/15/00 11:02 AM

		 To: <alan.quaintance@enron.com>, <annmarie.tiller@enron.com>, "Barbour,
David" <davidbarbour@akllp.com>, <bill.bowes@enron.com>,
<brenda.l.funk@enron.com>, <brent.vasconcellos@enron.com>,
<brian.steinbrueck@enron.com>, <carol.st.clair@enron.com>,
<clint.freeland@enron.com>, <clint.walden@enron.com>, <damon@rlf.com>,
<david.bermingham@rbcds.com>, <eawilburn@prickett.com>,
<emily.jelich@royalbank.com>, <gareth.bahlmann@enron.com>,
<gina.karathanos@enron.com>, <jlawler@wilmingtontrust.com>,
<john.bruen@rbcds.com>, <kenton@rlf.com>, <kevin.d.jordan@enron.com>,
<lkao@mayerbrown.com>, "Lowe, Deborah" <deborahlowe@akllp.com>, "McFarling,
Muriel" <murielmcfarling@akllp.com>, <mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com>,
"Popplewell, Tom" <tompopplewell@akllp.com>, <ryan.siurek@enron.com>,
"Sargent, Pat" <patsargent@akllp.com>, "Sullivan, Danny"
<dannysullivan@akllp.com>, <tamullen@prickett.com>, <tara.rafter@enron.com>,
<tellwood@mayerbrown.com>, <trevor.randolph@enron.com>,
<trushar.patel@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron/Cerberus

People have had trouble opening the documents  in last night's distribution.?
We have rerun the redlines and these are now  attached in WordPerfect.? These
same documents will be forwarded in Word by  separate email.? Please contact
Danny Sullivan at (214) 659-4645 with  comments.? Thank you.

 - Blank Bkgrd.gif
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265261V5 TO DOC NUM 265261V6.wpd
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265302V5 TO DOC NUM 265302V6.wpd
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265523V4 TO DOC NUM 265523V5.wpd
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265535V2 TO DOC NUM 265535V3.wpd
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265539V5 TO DOC NUM 265539V6.wpd
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265544V3 TO DOC NUM 265544V4.wpd
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 266489V2 TO DOC NUM 266489V3.wpd
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 266490V5 TO DOC NUM 266490V6.wpd
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 266518V2 TO DOC NUM 266518V3.wpd
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 268865V1 TO DOC NUM 268865V2.wpd


Everyone,

In an effort to protect our computing systems from viruses and other potential threats, we have disabled the ability to get to external e-mail sites (AOL, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc.) while you are using an Enron computer connected to our network.

If you are using a particular external e-mail site for valid business reasons and this action we have taken has impacted your business, you can contact your Resolution Center for assistance.  Each case will be analyzed for validity and exceptions granted based on business related needs.

Thank you for your understanding that protecting our revenue generating systems is our highest priority.

Enron Global Technology


I just want to give everyone my idea on how we will maintain DealBench to
catch up with LiveLink.

Tonight I will finish moving files from LiveLink to "O" drive for 6 peaker
projects. Once I move everything to "O" drive, I need to do following two
things to maintain DealBench.

Update files from "To be filed" folder since every file to go to "Due
Diligence" folder goes to "To be filed" folder first.
Jon: Please let me know whenever you move files from "Project Files" to "Due
Diligence" and whenever you delete files in "Due Diligence".

I think this process should allow me to make sure that DealBench files are
same as LiveLink files. Let me know if you find any hole in this process.
Thanks.

Jin


Today Enron Broadband Services announced a 20-year exclusive agreement with
Blockbuster to deliver a revolutionary new "entertainment on demand" service
to consumers.   Consumers will be able to order movies from the convenience
of their homes, and watch them on their televisions whenever they want.  To
learn more about this exciting announcement and view a webcast featuring
interviews with Ken Lay and Blockbuster CEO John Antioco, visit
http://www.ebentertainmentondemand.com/.