Trena:  Can you please let me know if the docs from Chase are to amend the
existing Repo Agreement between ENA and Chase?  What type of transactions
will you be doing with Chase?  The docs I received are from a woman named
Monica Turner and she has not returned my phone call.  She did not provide an
email address so I don't know how to get in touch with Chase.  Can you help?
Maybe get me another name?  Thanks.  Sara


Jeff,
Congratulations on yesterday's earnings release - the market reacted well.
Feedback I got from a large bank on the street is that they always recommend
buying ENE in the weeks leading up to earings releases.  I don't want to be
a pain, but you had said to let you know if I had not heard from Jeff by
today.  I'm happy to be the one to make the call - just let me know.

Halley and Michael's opening was quite successfull and the show is great.
have fun in London.
Nat


Texans fans, the holidays are approaching and now you can order newly arrived
Texans merchandise, such as hats, sweatshirts, Big man tees in 2XL through
5XL sizes, long sleeve tees, embroidered tees, team yearbook, denim shirts
and ladies polo shirts in addition to many other Texans items at
http://store.houstontexans.com.

Hats
http://store.houstontexans.com/cgi-bin/texans.cgi?partno=NFL-PUMTEXCAP-002&err
or=&stype=hats
Sweatshirts
http://store.houstontexans.com/cgi-bin/texans.cgi?partno=NFL-ANTCREW-001&error
=&stype=sweatshirts
Embroidered tees
http://store.houstontexans.com/cgi-bin/texans.cgi?partno=NFL-TEXEMBTEE-001&err
or=&stype=tees
Ladies polo shirts
http://store.houstontexans.com/cgi-bin/texans.cgi?partno=NFL-ANTLBPOLO-003&err
or=&stype=forfemalefans

If you order $50 or more of Texans merchandise online between now and Dec.
20, you,ll receive free shipping and handling. Have a happy holiday season !

Check out these specials and more at http://store.houstontexans.com
---
You are currently subscribed to texansnews as: GWHALLE@ENRON.COM
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-texansnews-179392T@newsletter.houstontexans.com


I'm forwarding the attached as an update.  Am presently researching the issue
raised by Drew, and will let you know what I find.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 03/13/2000
08:50 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           03/13/2000 07:51 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com

Subject: Re: TW acquisition of capacity on PNM

I found the reference I was remembering over the weekend.  Check out the
order issued to TriState Pipeline at Docket CP99-61.  FERC got all over CMS
on the problems posed by "dual jurisdictional facilities" whatever that
means.  CMS tried to do something that sounds a lot like what PNM would be
doing under the idea you guys had.

---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/13/2000
07:48 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           03/12/2000 08:37 PM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: TW acquisition of capacity on PNM

Interesting.  Assuming we could satisfy the Texas Eastern criteria (which
would be tough given that this is a firm service, unlike our market center
service), we still need to think about PNM's situation.  The letter says they
are a Hinshaw.  This deal would seem to blow their Hinshaw exemption.  There
is some new law on use of capacity on a Hinshaw for interstate service, only
I think it involved a capacity lease instead of service agreements.   I think
it was one of the Northeast pipeline cases involving CMS.  Does PNM know that
we would use their service for interstate transportation?  If we can crack
the Hinshaw issue, this might be worth a shot.  DF

Mary Kay Miller
03/11/2000 11:22 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW acquisition of capacity on PNM

Mary,  I was unable to forward the attachment--  so try to get it form Glen
Susan,  I don't think it is a problem to try this, however,  do we have the
current rates including fuel etc that we would have to pay and how much
capacity would we be acquiring?  Need to see this-  MK

	From:  Susan Scott                           03/10/2000 04:14 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: TW acquisition of capacity on PNM

The Commercial Group has been discussing with PNM the possibility of entering
into service agreements for firm capacity on the portion of PNM's system
between Blanco and Rio Puerco.  This would effectively operate as an
expansion of TW's system from the San Juan Basin to the mainline.  TW would
acquire PNM capacity then post it as available on the EBB just like we post
other capacity.  Shippers could then use the capacity to transport gas from
Blanco to any point on TW's system.   The capacity that PNM has available at
this time is seasonal (summer months) only, so it would be used to provide
short-term firm capacity or LFT to TW customers.   The marketers anticipate
that the additional capacity would mostly be used to ship gas to points on
TW's mainline besides Rio Puerco -- in other words, the total path used by
shippers would be a combination of PNM's system and TW's system.  Shippers
wouldn't necessarily know whether PNM capacity was being used to provide
service on their contract, only that their gas is being shipped from A to B.

In re-reading the Texas Eastern line of cases, I believe we can distinguish
TW's proposal from that in Northern's Docket No. 97-388 because it is more
specific (we are asking for authority to acquire capacity on a specific
pipeline) and because it is more in the nature of an expansion of TW's
constrained San Juan lateral rather than a proposal to broker other
pipelines' capacity.  I may be overly optimistic, but I also believe we meet
all the Texas Eastern criteria.

I realize that I have not discussed this very extensively (or at all) with
any of you, but I have gone ahead and drafted the proposal in the form of a
letter to FERC.  It seemed the most efficient way to provide a starting point
for discussion, especially since I was able to borrow heavily from our
successful Market Center Services filing.  I'm not yet sure where we will
include it in the tariff, but I propose tariff language along the lines of
"Transporter may contract for firm transportation service on Public Service
Company of New Mexico for use in providing transportation service from the
Blanco receipt point on Transporter's system.  The cost incurred for
acquisition of any such services shall be separately recorded in Account No.
___.  Transporter is at risk for recovery of costs associated with such
services."

After you've reviewed the attached, please let me know your overall
substantive comments and let's talk about the best way to proceed.  Thanks.


Kay:

For your information.  Do you think Mark Haedicke would let me out of this job to pursue this opportunity?

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:16 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	FW: Dierker Resigns

Per our discussion.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Edison, Andrew
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:15 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.; Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	Dierker Resigns

Chech this out:

http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/2001/1018/1265903.html


Cool, what did he say?  Neither John or I will be around so no reason not to roll early.
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 20 09:50:30 2001
Subject: RE:

I am doing her thing on Saturday in the middle of nowhere Texas.  Kind of a compromise.  My thing Thursday.

John told me to take off as early as I want tomorrow for the drive.  So I think I shall.  I called my boy at San Joaquin.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:37 AM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

Atta boy. Probably a good choice. Your girl okay with it?  GHG is a snoozer. Go ahead and call your boy. Tell him we're checking on some things.
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 20 09:30:38 2001
Subject: RE:

I just got back from the greenhouse gas meeting.  The meeting was good. But you will be retired before that program is worth anything as far as a good trading program is concerned.

John, said he talked with you on the phone about the b-plan.  I added a table of contents, and if John gives me anything to add I will.

I am going home (LA) tomorrow so I might work half a day.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

Nah. I'm gonna keep it my little secret.
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 20 09:22:09 2001
Subject: RE:

Just to keep up good relations.  I told him we would get back with him.  Please let me know if you do not call him.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:44 AM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

I suppose. Nothing to tell him though.
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 20 07:37:23 2001
Subject: RE:

I put it in my original message below.  It is 832-496-0123.  Tom Hartman with San Joaquin Power. I imagine a natural.  Are you going to call him today?

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

Is he a broker or a natural?  I've heard about the company through cantor. He's not going anywhere.  Everyone says they want to move fast then the jack around. You got his number?
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Nov 19 17:06:19 2001
Subject: RE:

I didn't want to talk price with him.  He saw our ERCs (that we just sold for $15,000) on website and called Kevin's line.  I was told to pick up the phone.  I told him somebody would call him back.  Either you or I would if you didn't want to call him.  He wanted to move fast, and he mentioned he used brokers in the past.

If none are out, I think we should call and tell him.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE:

Who is that and how do you know him?  I haven't seen any come on since we sold some. What was his bid?
 Trevor Woods

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Michael E <Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Woods, Trevor <Trevor.Woods@ENRON.com>
CC: Massey II, John <John.Massey@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Nov 19 15:56:46 2001
Subject: RE:

I just spoke with Tom Hartman of San Joaquin Power.  He wants up to 20 HGA NOx ERCS.  I told him I would have to check.  He wants to move quickly.  His number is 832-496-0123.  I know we do not have any, but I wanted to see if an arb was possible before we tell him we do not have any.


Kay's Son (7)


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 07/23/2000 08:48 AM -----

	"Heath, Paul" <pheath@velaw.com>
	07/20/2000 03:37 PM

		 To: "Richard Sanders (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron/Ecogas

Richard-
 The following is a list of  initial due diligence items that we need
to review in advance of a more comprehensive meeting:

1. All closing documents for the Enron stock purchase and loan.

2. Corporate organizational chart for both personnel and legal entities.

3. All audited and interim financials on Ecogas since January of 1999 (on an
entity by entity basis, if available).

4. List of payables on a per entity basis.

5. All major customer contracts (e.g. Frito Lay), real property leases and
any leases at waste disposal sites.

6. Enron consulting agreement and any employment agreements.

7. Organizational documents for each entity.

8. List of intercompany payables.

9. All documents relating to long tem debt (e.g. bonds) and notes on trade
payables.

10. All internal Enron business and financial reports evaluating whether to
make the investment and any subsequent Enron business or financial reports
evaluating the business.

11. Legal analysis prepared by counsel to Enron regarding Ecogas.

12. Ecogas board minutes since July of 1999.

13. Any Ecogas business plans submitted to Enron.

14. Any appraisals or valuations of Egogas or its assets.

15. Information submitted to IRS in connection with request for private
letter ruling on Section 40 tax credits.

16. List of any transfers made to ENA by Ecogas since July of 1999.

17. Documents relating to Fidelity tax credits.

18. Documents relating to Freshgas letter of credit.

These documents should give us a good start in evaluating the situation.
Please feel free to send them to me on a piecemeal basis. Thanks again for
using V&E on this engagement and I very much look forward to working with
you and your team.

Paul Heath
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
3700 Trammell Crow Center
2001 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75201-2975
Phone 214.220.7976
Fax 214.999.7976
E-mail pheath@velaw.com

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
Contains attorney-client communications and or attorney work product


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000
06:12 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  John J Lavorato                           07/10/2000 04:03 PM

Sent by: Kimberly Hillis
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: System Meeting 7/11

This is to confirm a meeting for tomorrow, Tuesday, July 11 at 2:00 pm.
Please reference the meeting as Systems Meeting and also note that there will
be a follow up meeting.   The meeting will be held in EB3321.

Call Kim Hillis at x30681 if you have any questions.

k


I ain't forgot.  Your proposal is a "touchy" one, and let's just say that
it's required some nimble dancing in the attempt to gauge where folks sit, if
you get my drift.  I'm still on the case, however.


Phil, I will drop my wire amount for Thursday if Tallahassee does not call on the gas next week.  I need to research how much gas Tallahassee has taken in the past on the swing contract.


214 875-9806...what's yours?

Mike.Carson@enron.com on 08/16/2001 01:41:39 PM

To:   Christopher W Jackson/Trading/Houston/EES/US@TU
cc:

Subject:  RE:

WHAT IS YOUR # AT WORK??

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Chris Jackson" <Chris_Jackson@txu.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Chris+20Jackson+22+20+3CChris+5FJackson+40txu+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:36 AM
   To:     Carson, Mike
   Subject:  RE:

   I left early so I'll try you later today...

   Mike.Carson@enron.com on 08/15/2001 04:06:31 PM

   To:   Christopher W Jackson/Trading/Houston/EES/US@TU
   cc:

   Subject:  RE:

   give me a shout if you get this before 5pm....713-853-6203

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Chris Jackson" <Chris_Jackson@txu.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Chris+20Jackson+22+20+3CChris+5FJackson+40txu+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:20 AM
      To:     Carson, Mike
      Subject:

      Dude,

      What is up???  I've got lots of news for you...let's see...I'm
   recently
      engaged...work is going well...traveling a bit and enjoying Dallas
      though I'm a
      true Houstonian...And you?

      Jackson

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and may
   contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended
   recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is
   strictly
   prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
   receive for
   the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
   enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
   message.
   This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer
   (or an
   acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable
   contract
   between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
   recipient or any
   other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a
   contract by
   estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


How about if we meet around 8:00 or 8:30.... sounds like that is most
compatable with people's schedules.... :o)

Can't wait!!!!!

Love,

Jen

>From: Ashleastu@aol.com
>To: jkbowles@hotmail.com, rebeccacooke@hotmail.com,
>julianna.grisham@halliburton.com, Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com,
>Susan.M.Scott@enron.com, sarah_c_buck@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: A Christmas Tasters
>Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 19:22:42 EST
>
>I am so excited about our christmas gift exchange! such a great idea!
>thanks
>for organizing this! i have a final that night until 8:30, but then i will
>be
>finished with school!! i will either bring a dessert or an hor d'orveous
>(sp?) - i need to look throught some cookbooks!!
>what time are we planning on meeting?
>love, ashlea

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


yours truly just got interviewed by the Office of the US Trustee to see if I wanted to serve on the Creditors Committee representing the ex- and current employee group.  I find out later if I made the cut.


Sounds like a blast.  My work thing was fun.  I broke my sobreity and got
really drunk, went home and passed out at 8pm.  I was totally loaded.  It was
very fun though. My interviews went awesome yesterday.  I think I will get
that job.   So what do you have planned for the weekend?  Anything exciting?


Hi Sweetie --

Out here in California.  Trying to rally support for competition.

Hope you and Grace are having a good day.

I love you,

Jim


THis should be considered work in progress as Marcelo is aggresively chasing
the people needed to obtain the timelines.

Sally, I believe I mentioned the SAP delay to you last Friday and the issues
of AS400 prioritisation ( a lot of very significant work logjammed ) but if
you need more colour please call me

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 13/11/2000 20:35
---------------------------

Marcelo Parra@MGUSA
13/11/2000 17:59
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, , Tim
Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Doorstep meeting

Mike,

Please find attached  a status and time line of doorstep issues identified by
Shona Wilson and the RAC group.

Note that some specific implementation dates have not been provided by
responsible parties a of today.  I have asked respective responsible parties
for specific dates and will update schedule attached as I receive the
information.

Further note that IT drives many of our critical dates.  Since our last
meeting we have been advised that any AS 400 system changes will not be
considered top priority as the IT team will focus on the off balance sheet
financing that must be in place by calendar year end.  Also, with the London
SAP implementation pushed off until April 2001, the credit aggregation system
will not be available until such time.

Please let me know if you have nay questions or comments to the attached.

	Mike Jordan@ECT
	11/07/00 07:45 AM

		 To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcelo
Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Doorstep meeting

Shona

Thanks for the meeting yesterday - I think the process does improve the
transparency and accountability of issues raised.

After the call I mentioned to Ted that the meetings might be 'more efficient'
if the specific issues identified during doorstep visits - that underpin
report comments - were validated by the direct controller on 'point' for the
office/business - in this case Marcelo. Ted replied that no harm came from
the current approach and to a certain degree I agree that it is good to get
an immediate collective response to issues raised !However, I thought we
could discuss this for future meetings ( it could be part of the 'how to do a
doorstep review' that my guys requested so they are ready to do their
individual reviews next year ) -will call later

Additionally, I thought I would confirm with you the actions I took down

Marcelo and yourself to identify/communciate the specific control concerns
identified that were not part of the core tasks transfered
Marcelo to add these to existing process efficiencies ( such as systems
improvements etc ) and give a full timeline for all 'doorstep' issues
Tim to send details of outward bound Commercial instructions and to validate
that no specfic exceptions have been recorded to date.
Marcelo to validate that no existing business activities conflict
systematically with the above instructions
All to prepare for full NY review so as to validate compensating controls
exist and function in NY
Marcelo / Me to identify if any cultural issues are left from recent business
communications on roles and responsibilities
Myself to ensure that doorstep issues are included within database and
monitoring process ( on timelines ) happens

Will call later

Mike


Good Morning Ducky!

Check this out and tell me what you think.  It is a guide as to how the 1st
Ministry of Prayer Open House (if you will) might be.


Saidia called me w/information


I have created deal 559843 to cover the flow for Nov 1 thru Jan 31.  This
deal will probably be handled month-to-month from here on out.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/05/2001 10:37 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dec 2000 - meter 1351

Daren - There was flow at meter 1351 for Dec 2000.  It flowed every day, with
an average flow of 151/day.  The last deal associated with this meter was
274772 in October '00.  It also flowed in November with no nom, it is
currently on stranger's gas.  Can you please take a look at this?  Thanks.

Aimee


i'm going to kick your ass at practice just like i kicked your ass last year
at fantasy football

Bryan Hull
06/29/2000 10:49 AM
To: O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Practice

Well, we blew it last night. We should have won that game. Let's try and get
together on the weekend of July 8th. Ask around and let's all try and find a
gym so we don't have to play outside. Let me know what you hear and when you
would like to get together.

Bryan


Kim,

I talked to Dale early this morning and suggested that we meet during his next trip to Houston
when we decide on timing of our project.

Vince

From:	Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/01/2001 08:41 AM
To:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gadd/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:	FW: FW: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Vince,

If Dale comes in to see you, it looks like Eric might be available to meet with you as well.  It would be a good opportunity for Eric to meet Dale and get a little more information on his model.  Eric's phone number is X54713.

Thanks,

Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gadd, Eric
Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 8:12 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	Re: FW: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Works for me.  Give me a call at 9:30.

From:	Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 05:09 PM
To:	Eric Gadd/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	FW: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Eric, FYI. Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince
Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 5:07 PM
To:	dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com
Cc:	Watson, Kimberly; Kaminski, Vince
Subject:	Re: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Dale,

Please, call me on Tuesday. My morning schedule is full but I am open in the afternoon.

Vince

"Dale M. Nesbitt" <dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com> on 04/30/2001 01:51:21 AM
Please respond to <dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com>
To:	"Vincent Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, "Kimberly S. Watson" <kwatson@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Vince/Kim:

I am flying to Houston tonight and wondered if it would fit one or both of
your schedules to get together this coming Tuesday sometime for 1/2 hour or
so.  I really want to reinitiate the conversations MarketPoint was having
with John Goodpasture and you, and he said either or both of you were the
right people to continue after his responsibility shift.  John was quite
positive about the idea of Enron acquiring MarketPoint NARG through license,
and he implied that one or both of you would be carrying the ball in that
direction after he handed it to you.

Would this coming Tuesday morning at 930 am be a good time for you guys?  If
so, please give me an email shout at the above address or leave a message on
my voicemail at (650)218-3069.  I think you will be truly impressed with the
scope and progress we have been able to make with both the short run NARG
and the long run NARG in which you were interested (not to mention our power
model).  The progress is noticeable since you saw it.  Both long and short
term NARG are having quite an impact on a number of gas decisions at the
moment ranging from Venezuelan LNG, North American LNG import terminals and
term, gas basis calculations, trading support, power plant development,
gas-to-power price spreads in key markets, veracity of heat rate trades,
bank financings, storage field evaluation, and which new pipelines we can
expect to see enter and which are dogs.

I really hope we can fit it in and get our discussions moving in a mutually
productive direction again.  I think NARG can help you become even more
successful, and I look forward to working with you.

We have a new office address and new phone number as well.  (We move in May
1.)

Altos Management Partners
95 Main Street, Suite 10
Los Altos, CA  94022
(650)948-8830 voice
(650)948-8850 FAX
(650)218-3069 Cellular

Give the phones a week or so to get "debugged" and then switch over.

Dale

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Hey Lisa-

  Here is the information for the SUPRISE 'party' for Jeffrey's birthday.  His B'day is Friday and we are going to have a party for him (and another friend named Ron who's birthday is Thursday) this Saturday.  Since this is Cinco De Mayo weekend, we are going to go to Who Song and Larry's in John's Landing, but it will be packed, so we are all going to meet up at the Willamette Athletic Club in the Cafe', which is right across the street. We will have snacks and cake at the Club and then walk over to Who Song & Larry's together so we all get in together. Who Song's will have drinks, food, dancing, etc.

 Please let me know if you can make it.

  Thanks,

  Virginia
  my home email: pinnocchio@hotmail.com

DATE: 	Saturday May 4, 2002
TIME: 	4:15 p.m. (Jeff and I will be there around 4:30 p.m.)
PLACE: Willamette Athletic Club,  4949 SW Landing Drive, Portland, 97201,  phone: (503) 225-1068
OTHER:  If you can't make it to the club cafe, please join us after 4:45 or 5:00 pm at Who Song and Larry's across the street.

Map to Willamette Athletic Club: (Call me if you need better details.  It's a little complicated to find the first time)
http://maps.yahoo.com/py/pmap.py?Pyt=Typ&addr=4949+SW+Landing+Dr&city=Portland&state=OR&slt=45.487000&sln=-122.674600&name=Willamette+Athletic+Club&zip=97201&country=us&BFCat=&BFClient=&mag=10&desc=(503)+225-1068&cs=9&newmag=9&ds=n


I can come!


I can only imagine the extreme pressure and stress you are under right now.  I just want to say that we have every confidence in you  and the management team you are forming.  WE will get through this, just as our country will get through the international situation.

Everyone needs a word of encouragement every now and then; I wanted to say we are behind you, respect you and your leadership.

We are trying to do our part in staying focused on our responsibilities, and in some small way contribute to correcting Enron's reversal of fortunes.

Thanks, Ken, for your dedication and inspiration.
	-jtm


If these tests involve book-ids that are already in risktrac, then we should be fine - since the positions will flow into the existing portfolios. If not, then new bookids and portfolios will have to be created to capture these positions.

Regards,
Ramesh
From:gramesh@skytel.com


jeff richters trades

missing deals

sell duke
Q401
25 mw
140.00
np15
off peak

buy ees
Q401
25 mw
139.95
np15
off peak

sell williams
15-28th
25 mw
310.00
np15
on peak

thanks


Happy 2000 and welcome back to Haas.

The Haas Marketing and Communications Web Team is happy to present a new
web page for you. At
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/Webteam/setup.html, you'll find
information about the Haas web site and about maintaining your own Haas web
pages. Of particular interest may be the Haas "How do I?" web page at
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/Webteam/howdoi.html, directing
students, faculty members and staff members to various web development
resources. As with all web pages, this is a forever-growing module, so
watch for new additions as the year 2000 grows older.

Debra.

_______________________________

Debra Goldentyer
Web Editor
Haas School of Business
University of California Berkeley

550E Student Services Building
Mail: 545 Student Services, #1900
Berkeley, California 94720-1900
Phone: 510 - 643 - 3847
Fax: 510 - 642 - 4700
E-mail: goldenty@haas.berkeley.edu

 - att1.htm


Louise and Marcus,

Received the new Approval Notice with Marcus' name spelled correctly this week.  No action required as the new visa stamp has already been obtained.

PwC, the compensation team and I met this week regarding the proposed deferred compensation scheme.  An issue was raised for PwC to research before moving forward.  Will keep you updated.

Regards,


As Mike and I look across all of our business units, we continue to look for
optimal organizational structures that will enable each business unit to
achieve it's targets for  2001 and beyond.  In our weather business, there
appears to be a lack of seamlessness.  Reporting relationships, P&L, and
vision for this business are not best aligned as this business exists today.

Mike and I would like to address this as follows:    we need 100% full time
dedication from each and any employee that is dedicated to the weather
business.  All identified employees in the weather business will now become
full time employees of EGM and report to Mark Tawney. Accordingly Mark and I
will be looking at, with each of you, the employees that may be affected by
this transition and the need to hire additional employees.  It is important
that both business units work together to determine which individuals will be
in Weather, or  will be in EEL.  Once done, Mark will begin adding to the
weather team in each of your regions.   It is obvious that the organizations
and product lines can lever each other and the synergy's will provide
powerful results in our regional gas and power businesses in particular.

If you look at coal, lng, equities, etc, we have employees based in each of
your regions who report back into the appropriate business unit within EGM.
This restructure will similarly align weather.

Please give me a call and we will discuss the issues surrounding this new
structure.


You got it.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 4:02 PM
To: Comnes, Alan
Subject: Re: FW: 5 State Energy Advisors Fired Over Conflicts Ethics: The
consultants were involved in buying electricity for California from a
generator whose stock they owned, setting up a clash of official duties,
personal interests.

we're always looking for new recruits, eh?


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 08:21 AM -----

	Janet R Dietrich
	01/31/2001 04:34 PM

		 To: John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron, David V Porter/PDX/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, LaCrecia
Davenport/Corp/Enron@Enron, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Draft DASH for CMP Standard Offer Deal

John, thanks for the update. I sat down with John Lavorato and Dana Davis
this morning to review the deal and get John's approval under the current
terms. He has approved the deal in it's current form however, to the extent
that we have any material change in the terms I'll need to be sure he's OK
with the changes in advance of any binding committment with Central Maine.
This is definitely a deal we want to do and given the anticipated
acceleration in the negotiations and possible execution, we need to be sure
that we're able to react and transact quickly. Dana Davis is obviously on
point for all pricing. For all others who have involvement here - please
ensure that you're on board with your piece of the deal as is, and available
to focus on any negotiated changes that may come up over the next couple of
days. Berney Aucoin will be on point for coordinating and managing all
internal pricing, approvals, etc., so be sure that Bernie can get ahold of
you if he needs to.

Also, for the DASH signatures, why don't you move both Kevin and I to
"Regional Management" and let Ader and Davis sign for Origination and
Trading.

Thanks and good luck!
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
03:51 PM ---------------------------

John Llodra@ENRON
01/31/2001 11:50 AM
To: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market
Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice
R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, LaCrecia
Davenport/Corp/Enron@Enron, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft DASH for CMP Standard Offer Deal

All:

As some of you may be aware, we are in the process of negotiating with
Central Maine Power Company regarding the assumption of a portion of their
wholesale obligations associated with their Standard Offer Service load in
the State of Maine, covering at least March 1, 2001 - Feb 28, 2002.   We are
currently in the process of negotiating a contract and transaction terms.
They are simultaneously discussing same with other suppliers.  At this point,
there are a number of outstanding items (including numerous contract items
and credit arrangements).  However, we expect that the pace of the
negotiation process will be very quick over the next 1-3 days.   As an
example of how quickly things might move, CMP has indicated that the Maine
PUC is poised to hold deliberations and approve CMP's signing of a contract
within 24 hours of CMP/Enron agreement on contract terms (with updated firm
pricing to be supplied just prior to PUC deliberations and held open for
about 2-3 hours).

Key members of our negotiating team on this deal are as follows:

Origination/Marketing:  John Llodra, George Wood
Legal:  Janice Moore
Regulatory/Governmental:  Daniel Allegretti
Commodity Structuring:  Jim Meyn, Zach Sampson
Credit:  Edward Sacks, Tracy Ngo

Attached below is a draft of the DASH for this prospective deal.  Items
subject to change or still under negotiation are noted.   While this DASH is
prepared assuming we obtain a multi-year extension swaption, there is a
chance it may end up being a single year deal for the period Mar 1, 01- Feb
28, 02.   My intent in sending the DASH at this time is to familiarize you
all with the aspects of the deal at this point in time, to enable us to move
quickly to get internal approvals in the event we reach final agreement with
CMP over the next couple of days.  Once agreement is reached with CMP on
outstanding items, a revised DASH will be circulated.  Please feel free to
call me at 978-449-9936, or Jim Meyn/Berney Aucoin in structuring (5-3223,
3-4784) if you have any questions on the commercial structure or valuation to
date.  Thanks.

Regards
John


ADVERSE IMPACT MEETING - EB49C1


Start Date: 10/23/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102322.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:59 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; SMITH, Douglas; Lavorato, John; Black, Don; Forster, David; Duran, W. David; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Foster, Chris H.; Black, Tamara Jae; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Furrow, Dale; Meyn, Jim; Harvey, Claudette; Presto, Kevin M.; Jacoby, Ben
Subject:	FW: RTO week--State Commissioners

FYI.

TJ and Claudette -- please send to your groups.
Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Landwehr, Susan M.
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:19 PM

Thursday Morning session----Meeting with State Commissioners

This session was generally known to be the occasion for state commissioners to vent their frustrations at FERC taking action without including them in the decision making process.  Although the panel notice showed that 5 state commissioners would attend, upon arriving in the hearing room we found that 27 state commissioners were there and ready to claim their 15 minutes of fame.  It was a long morning!  I will include comments or highlights from some of the commissioners below as well as some general thoughts.

Approximately 35 to 40% of the commenters were supportive of FERC and urged them to keep moving forward with their efforts.  Most of these comments came from the Midwest and were somewhat muted or rational in their support.  Everyone else was fairly verbal against FERC, primarily citing that fact that they had been left out of the process, that FERC was moving too quickly, and there was no evidence that there was a benefit to their citizens.  In particular, the commissioners from Maryland and North Carolina delivered highly charged rhetoric. While many would think that the session was extremely negative (our friend Sarah Novosel thought it was disgusting!) in my mind it was similiar to a legislative hearing--allowing alot of whining and then addressing the main themes of discontent such as performing a cost benefit analysis.

Here's some individual comments:

Catherine Riley/Maryland---she started out talking about the fact that she had taken a solemn oath to uphold the constitution when she joined the MAryland commission and immediately implied that FERC was not as diligent or honest as she was in upholding the values of protecting citizens (she was way overboard in the dramatics department).  She then stated that she was not at the meeting to "help you (FERC) backfill your woefully inadequate evidentiary record".  It went on like this for about 15 minutes.  The good part is that she was so personally negative, that her comments will not only be discounted but may be used against her.

Sam Ervin/NOrth Carolina---he was also very negative and he does not believe that there are any benefits to his citizens, that customer choice is never coming to his state, so he will never benefit from an RTO, that his current statutes do not allow any transfer of transmission to an RTO (and I bet if they do, he'll work to change the statutes!) and that the bulk of state commissions are not supportive of FERC. His comments were also pretty brutal, but sugar coated just a bit with southern humor.

Arnetta McRae/Delware---she kept on saying "show me" where the benefits for consumers are.  She also repeatedly talked about how short of a time frame they had to respond to the order.

Rory McMinn/New Mexico---repeatedly talked about how the west was different, how he is not convinced that there is a benefit to his consumers, how the FERC commissioners needed to come out west to see how different they were.

Carl Wood/California--tried to portray himself and California as representing the west as a whole, and even brought along a statement from the Washington commission echoeing his comments. He delivered the same messages that we've been hearing forever---FERC should have acted sooner on price caps, etc etc.

Glen Thomas/Pennsylvania---he was the first positive commenter and talked about how his state has taken great strides to bring it's energy system into the new century...that by opening it's markets they have had an explosion in green power, they have reduced costs all across the state, etc. He was very supportive of PJM (makes sense because it's in his back yard) and stated that for any RTO to be effective it must have independent governance.

Judy Jones/Ohio---was very parochial in her discussion, but echoed Don Svanda's comments from earlier in the week that one RTO for the midwest was necessary and encouraged the FERC to make a decision and get on with it so that regulatory uncertainty would be removed.

Ed GArvey/Minnesota---he got the gold star for the day.  After very very lengthly comments from about 15 commissioners, he took about 1 minute and said "FERC--just get it done"....in essence telling them to go ahead with what they are doing and move forward.

Other Commissioners who talked were:  Arthur/Connecticut, Hadley/Indiana, Huelsman/Kentucky, Nugent/ Maine  all on the positive side.  Other negative commentors were two guys from DC and Jim Irvin from Arizona who had a rambling conversation that never really pinpointed what he wanted to do.

From the FERC commissioner standpoint, the gold star went to Massey.  After hearing over and over again about how the commisioners didn't feel that they had been included and that FERC had not consulted them enough, he stated that he was going to express his frustration right back, saying the "there has been 7 years of process, and he wants a process that comes to an end....you've been talking for 7 years and never could agree..."

Call me if I can provide any further insights into the individual comments or the tenor of the meeting.  Sue.  #612-339-4599


---------------------- Forwarded by Allison Navin/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2000
05:24 PM ---------------------------

"Andrea Spring" <aae@dellnet.com> on 06/07/2000 05:02:03 PM
To: "'Allison Navin \(E-mail\)'" <Allison_Navin@enron.com>, "'Anthony Foti
\(E-mail\)'" <AFOTI@AKINGUMP.COM>, "Art Brownell \(E-mail\)"
<AWBrownell@aol.com>, "'Bill Paxon \(E-mail\)'" <bpaxon@akingump.com>,
"'Cynthia Sandherr \(E-mail\)'" <Cynthia_Sandherr@enron.com>, "David N.
Friedman \(E-mail\)" <david_friedman@afandpa.org>, "Donn Salvosa \(E-mail\)"
<DSalvosa@epsa.org>, "'Gay H. Friedmann \(E-mail\)'" <gfriedmann@ingaa.org>,
"'Gene Peters \(E-mail\)'" <gpeters@epsa.org>, "'Henry Hubbard \(E-mail\)'"
<hubbardh@fleishman.com>, "'Jamie Tucker \(E-mail\)'" <jtucker@akingump.com>,
"'Jane Turner \(E-mail\)'" <jane_turner@afandpa.org>, "'Jim McIntire
\(E-mail\)'" <jim_mcintire@cmahq.com>, "'Jim McVaney \(E-mail\)'"
<jim_mcvaney@cmahq.com>, "'John Runyan \(E-mail\)'" <john.runyan@ipaper.com>,
"'John Sparkman \(E-mail\)'" <jssparkman@papl.com>, "John Stinson \(E-mail\)"
<jmstinson@worldnet.att.net>, "'Karen Penafiel \(E-mail\)'"
<kpenafie@boma.org>, "'Katie Strong \(E-mail\)'" <kstrong@AKINGUMP.COM>,
"'Kevin O'Donovan \(E-mail\)'" <nymex1@unidial.com>, "Kim Brooks \(E-mail\)"
<kbrooks@nam.org>, "'Kim Martin \(E-mail\)'" <martinki@fleishman.com>, "'Marc
Yacker \(E-mail\)'" <myacker@elcon.org>, "'Mark L. Kemmer \(E-mail\)'"
<mark.l.kemmer@gm.com>, "'Mark Whitenton \(E-mail\)'" <mwhitenton@nam.org>,
"Nina Plaushin \(E-mail\)" <nplaushin@ppl.com>, "Paulette Pidcock \(E-mail\)"
<paulette.pidcock@pge-corp.com>, "'Steve Kline \(E-mail\)'"
<steven.kline@pge-corp.com>
cc:

Subject: Bliley transmission language

This is Chairman Bliley's "discussion draft," which he just released to the
Republican members.  Evidently, this is what he views as the essential
component of a bill, and he's invited members to build on this.  This
section contains transmission language, which clarifies that FERC has
jurisdiction over both bundled and unbundled transmission.  Bliley believes
that this language is "the start, understanding it and building on it, is
the next step."

_______________________________
Andrea Spring
Executive Director
Americans for Affordable Electricity
1101 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20004
phone: 202-347-6371
fax: 202-393-4637
e-mail: aspring.aae@dellnet.com

 - sectionbysection.wpd
 - summarydoc.wpd
 - 005_.PDF


Stephanie:  at the moment, you'll find an attached exhibit B which is the ENE
guaranty.  Check with me in the a.m.  thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001 07:00 PM -----

	TeiglandL@sullcrom.com
	03/19/2001 04:22 PM

		 To: Sshackl@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FINAL (?) ISDA side letter

.... is attached for your review, clean and blacklined versions.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Allegheny  ENRON ISDA SIDE LETTER(v4).DOC
 - Allegheny  ENRON ISDA SIDE LETTER(vRED).DOC


I was not able to schedule anything for today.  Can everyone be available for
the meeting on Monday or Tuesday from 1:00 to 2:00??

Thu
3-7159
---------------------- Forwarded by Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000 09:54 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Thu Nguyen                           02/01/2000 04:08 PM

To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer D
Pattison/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MidTex meeting

Daren will be available Thursday, after 1.  Please let me know if this is
good for everyone so that I can reserve a room.  Thanks

Thu


When you have a minute


I sent the draft strategy in yesterday's email to you.  Here is the final
version that we shared with Jeff.  I apologize for any confusion that this
caused.

Lisa

----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001 01:52 PM -----

	Lisa Yoho
	04/10/2001 03:11 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Enron's 201 Strategy

Rick and Steve -

Attached is Enron's government affairs strategy with respect to the potential
threat of "201" restrictions on steel imports.   This was developed with the
input of the DC office and outside counsel.  We will be meeting with Eric
Thode later this week to discuss the public relations piece.

Let me know if you have any questions, or if you would like background
information on section 201.

Lisa


We have been working with our Human Resources and Training department to create new learning opportunities for our group.  As a result, we are happy to introduce a professional development program for all of our Senior Administrative Assistants.

In an effort to bring all interested Senior Administrative Assistants the tools necessary to excel in their current positions, a library of learning opportunities has been selected for your use.  Each class was selected with continued performance, improvement, and sustained excellence in mind.

We are very interested in your success as an employee of the EWS Legal Department and  believe this new approach to professional development will allow all  assistants the chance to bring the team to new heights of professionalism and performance.

Listed below are course titles that apply to our group.  Please gain approval from your immediate supervisor and the administrative coordinator before registering for training.  Thank you for your participation.

?	Business Writing

?	Proofing legal documents (by request and can be arranged for a small group or an individual)

?	MS Word

?	MS PowerPoint

?	Customer Services (available Fall 2001)

?	Successful Working Relationships
o		Valuing Differences
o	Creating Understanding

?	CPS Certification (on-site and over the course of several months)

?	PLS Certification (off-site; offered through Houston Association of Legal Secretaries)

?	One off-site training per year for the purposes of skill acquisition

*Guideline:  No more than 1/3 of the administrative staff should be out of the office at any given time.


just send it out to the affected parties.

thxs
dave


Try talking to Nadeem Tufail in London.  I believe he is a paralegal that is
responsible for their corporate filings.


/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/
Wall of Champs Is Up!   If you've made your playoffs or won your league, let
the world know about it.   We've got our Wall of Champs up and running and
waiting for you.   Check it out here  http://footballguys.com/wall2001.cfm
You can add your team here http://footballguys.com/addwall.cfm   There's not
much better than flaunting your success in front of your league members...
Enjoy.
/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Hi Folks,

Doing our best to get these to you early in the week as you juggle your
lineups for this final week 17.   Here's how I see the Rushing Game Matchups
this week.

PLEASE NOTE:   See the cheatsheet online www.footballguys.com for exactly
where I rank players and to determine who to start.   I always receive
emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked highly on the cheatsheet but
listed under a matchup that favors the Defense.   Just because one matchup
may be more favorable than another, that doesn't necessarily mean I'd start
the player with the best matchup.   Ahman Green may have a horrible matchup
one week but unless you're sitting on Ricky Williams or Marshall Faulk,
Green's your guy no matter who he's lining up against.  (Yes, even after
last week's performance)  The matchup info is meant to be just one more tool
in your box when it comes to deciding between players.

Stats are provided by Mike Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software.
http://www.fflm.com/ for more info.   Fantasy Points Allowed by position
numbers are from ESPN.com.   Target numbers are from our Footballguy Andy
Hicks.
Let's get to it.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Locks:  These games feature Defenses that have struggled lately.

Baltimore's Terry Allen vs Minnesota Defense

Terry Allen ran hard last week where he rushed 20 times for 74 yards (3.3
ypc) against a tough Buc team.   It'll be much easier this week against the
swiss cheese Vikings ranked # 30 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the
last 4 weeks.   Although, these Vikings did shut down Ahman Green last week.
For the year, they rank # 31 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Denver's Terrell Davis vs Indianapolis Defense

Terrell Davis looked good again rushing for 89 yards on 18 carries (4.9 ypc)
It's been a tough year and you can bet he'll want to finish strong.   The
Colts rank # 23 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 29 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

New England's Antowain Smith vs Carolina Defense

A rested Antowain Smith faces the soft Carolina defense that's ranked # 31
in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 20 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Great matchup.

Pittsburgh's Chris Fuamatu-Ma'afala / Jerome Bettis vs Cleveland Defense

Fuamatu-Ma'afala was a workhorse on the ground Sunday but didn't have a lot
to show for it.   He ran 25 times for 55 yards (2.2 ypc)   He did score on a
receiving TD.   He'll face a weak Cleveland defense ranked # 29 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 20
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Washington's Stephen Davis vs Arizona Defense

Stephen Davis looked great rushing for 111 yards on 21 carries (5.3 ypc) and
the score.   He left with a knee tweak but it doesn't look to be serious.
Ki-Jana Carter played great after Davis left.   The Cardinals rank # 21 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 22 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Prime Matchups:  These games feature Defenses that haven't been strong
lately.

Buffalo's Shawn Bryson / Travis Henry / Sammy Morris vs Miami Defense

Bryson ran wild again rushing 28 times for 107 yards (3.8 ypc).   Sammy
Morris spelled him for a few carries and looked good too but it seems Bryson
is clearly the man here.   It's possible Henry could see action so keep an
eye on this one through the week.   The Dolphins have fallen down to # 28 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 17 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Dallas' Emmitt Smith vs Detroit Defense

Emmitt looked very solid again rushing for 126 yards on 26 carries (4.8 ypc)
although he failed to score.   He needs a little over 60 yards to get 1,000
for the season so you can bet he'll be gunning for that.   The Lions rank #
18 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 24 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

New York Giants' Tiki Barber / Ron Dayne vs Green Bay Defense

Barber saw more action with 16 carries and 71 yards (4.4 ypc) but it was
Dayne who scored with 59 yards on 8 carries (7.4 ypc)   Barber was very
active again in the passing game.   The Packers let Michael Bennett run well
Sunday and have slipped to # 27 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the
last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 13 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
RBs.

New York Jet's Curtis Martin vs Oakland Defense

Martin put in another Martin Like day with 115 yards on 19 carries (6.1 ypc)
The Jets may have problems, but Martin isn't one.   He'll face an Oakland
defense ranked # 19 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 21 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Oakland's Charlie Garner vs New York Jets Defense

The Raiders don't look nearly as strong as they did.   Garner only had 9
carries Sunday for 23 yards (2.6 ypc)   Tyrone Wheatley only had 5 carries.
This week they've got a nice matchup as they'll face the Jets ranked # 26 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 27 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Seattle's Shaun Alexander vs Kansas City Defense

Alexander didn't do much Sunday rushing 23 times for 59 yards (2.6 ypc)   He
'll be ok though and gets to face a Chief defense ranked # 22 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 23
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

St. Louis' Marshall Faulk vs Atlanta Defense

Start Faulk.   The question will be of course how much he plays but it was
pretty obvious Sunday that Mike Martz lets his guys play.   Trung Canidate
could have really used the work but he warmed the bench while Faulk went
nuts.   I'd say you'll get at least a half, maybe much more out of Faulk and
half of Faulk is worth more than most backs.   The Falcons rank # 24 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 28 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Even Matchups:  These games feature no real advantage either way

Arizona's Michael Pittman vs Washington Defense

Just when it looked like Michael Pittman was going to take over the clear
cut # 1 RB role, Thomas Jones steps in with 16 carries.   Pittman rushed 12
times for 89 yards (7.4 ypc) which was bolstered by a 39 yarder.   Jones ran
for 69 yards on 16 carries (4.3 ypc)   This was Carolina, though.   This
week will feature a tougher test with Washington ranked # 8 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they've been pretty
soft though and rank # 25 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Kansas City's Priest Holmes / Tony Richardson vs Seattle Defense

Priest Holmes ran 27 times for 91 yards (3.4 ypc) plus the score.   Tony
Richardson didn't have a carry.   This week, he'll face the Seahawks ranked
# 12 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the
year, they rank # 14 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Miami's Lamar Smith / Travis Minor vs Buffalo Defense

This is getting embarrassing.   Smith rushed 7 times for 4 yards (0.6 ypc)
Travis Minor had 33 yards on 9 carries (3.7 ypc)   He's becoming less and
less of a factor with each game.   The Dolphins are in the playoffs but find
themselves playing a different style of ball than they have been.   Minor's
a threat to go long on the screen passes and Smith is a long shot for a
cheap TD.   They'll face the Bills ranked # 13 in Rushing Yards Allowed per
Game over the last 4 weeks and # 26 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Minnesota's Michael Bennett vs Baltimore Defense

We said Bennett just needed carries and he got them Sunday rushing 25 times
for 104 yards (4.2 ypc)   He'll face a Baltimore defense that's numbers don'
t back up it's reputation this week - they rank # 25 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 2 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

New Orleans' Ricky Williams vs San Francisco Defense

Even though he didn't score, it was a better performance by Williams who
rushed 17 times for 74 yards (4.4 ypc)   The Saints clearly want him to be
more involved as he was Sunday.   This week, he'll face a 49er defense
ranked # 17 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 18
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

San Francisco's Garrison Hearst vs New Orleans Defense

Garrison Hearst was a non factor Sunday with just 35 yards on 11 carries
(3.2 ypc)   Kevan Barlow didn't do much either so it wasn't like he lost
time to another player.   This week, he gets the Saints who rank # 15 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 19 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Tampa Bay's Warrick Dunn / Mike Alstott vs Philadelphia Defense

Tampa's One-Two punch continues to work.   Alstott had 80 yards on 14
carries (5.7 ypc) and Dunn carried the ball 13 times for 47 yards (3.6 ypc)
Alstott's been more effective on the ground but Dunn seems to be more
involved in the passing game.   This week, they'll face an Eagle defense
ranked # 20 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 9
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downside Matchups:  These games feature a Defense that's been pretty strong
lately.

Cincinnati's Corey Dillon vs Tennessee Defense

Dillon showed again he can run on any defense.   He had 91 yards on 21
carries (4.3 ypc) against the Steelers.   He'll face the Titans this week
ranked # 6 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks so it won
't get much easier.   They rank # 15 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Detroit's Lamont Warren / James Stewart vs Dallas Defense

The Detroit RBs were horrible on the ground in this one with Lamont Warren
gaining 19 yards on 6 carries (3.2 ypc).   Cory Schlesinger did catch 11
passes though so maybe he's worth a longshot pick there.   The Cowboys rank
# 14 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 12 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Green Bay's Ahman Green vs New York Giants Defense

Green was shut down on the ground with just 31 yards on 16 carries (1.9 ypc)
although he did score.   Go figure.   He's still too good to sit in my
opinion.   This week, he'll face the Giants ranked # 10 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 3 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs so it's a tough matchup, although I think I'd
start Green unless you really have a solid alternative.

Indianapolis' Dominic Rhodes vs Denver Defense

Again, Dominic Rhodes looked excellent rushing for 83 yards on 20 carries
(4.2 ypc) with a score.   He'll face the Broncos this week ranked # 7 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 4 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   The Broncos are definitely
surging after the win in Oakland but I still like Rhodes.

Jacksonville's Stacey Mack vs Chicago Defense

Mack went off last week with 125 yards on 16 carries (7.8 ypc) and a score.
It'll be tougher this week against Chicago that ranks # 9 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 10 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Philadelphia's Duce Staley vs Tampa Bay Defense

Staley's receiving numbers had been carrying him lately and this week he
paid the price.   He only rushed 8 times for 23 yards (2.9 ypc) and was shut
 down receiving with just 2 receptions for -1 yards.   This week, he'll face
a surging Buc defense ranked # 16 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the
last 4 weeks and # 11 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Tennessee's Eddie George vs Cincinnati Defense

Eddie George looked the old Eddie Sunday with 130 yards on 26 carries (5.0
ypc)   Plus 2 scores.  This week he'll face a Bengal defense ranked # 11 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they
rank # 7 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Defensive Slam Dunks:  These games feature a Defense that's been very strong
lately.

Atlanta's Maurice Smith vs St. Louis Defense

Again, Maurice Smith ran poorly but got a cheap TD.   He managed just 38
yards on 15 carries (2.5 ypc).   Bob Christian stole 10 carries where he
gained 33 yards (3.3 ypc)   They're both a gamble against a tough Ram
defense ranked # 3 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 5 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Carolina's Richard Huntley vs New England Defense

Huntley ran pretty well last week gaining 62 yards on 12 carries (5.2 ypc).
He just didn't get enough carries for this awful Carolina team.   That won't
get any better this week agains the Patriots ranked # 2 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 16 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Chicago's Anthony Thomas vs Jacksonville Defense

Thomas ran 25 times for 76 yards (3.0 ypc) Sunday.   He'll face a tougher
defense in Jacksonville that's been awesome lately ranking # 1 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 8
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Thomas is still probably a starter in
most leagues, but the Jaguars have been extremely stingy of late.

Cleveland's Jamel White vs Pittsburgh Defense

White only had 42 yards on 21 carries (2.0 ypc) but did score twice.   Corey
Dillon showed the Steeler defense wasn't perfect last week.  They're still
tough though ranked # 4 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 1 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

That'll do it for the Rushing Matchups.   Passing Matchups to follow.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


(See attached file: Strip062402.pdf)

This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.


What's Next for
Enron Federal Credit Union

Over the years, Enron Federal Credit Union has been proud to share the Enron name and support many wonderful employees and their family members around the world.  Here are some of the exciting changes slated for the Credit Union in the coming months.

New Name
We believe it is important to change our name for the sake of our members and our organization. Our new name will reflect everything that we stand for: trustworthiness, outstanding service, innovative products, value and convenience. You can expect to hear about our official new name later this month.

Expanded Field of Membership
Also, being a single sponsor Credit Union for Enron Corp., it has become necessary to expand our field of membership. We continue to welcome and serve current Enron employees and their families, but we will now also invite individuals and businesses that live, work or worship in Downtown Houston and the surrounding areas to become members of our Credit Union.

Additional Location
Another immediate area of focus for the Credit Union is our location. We have made plans to open an additional full-service facility that will be located in close proximity to the Enron Building in the downtown area with easy access. More information about our new location will be announced as soon as it becomes available. At this time, our current office facility will remain open and accessible for all of our members.

We are excited about the changes that 2002 will bring and look forward to sharing the experience with each of our members.


Mark,

Could yu browze thru the attached term sheet and let me know whether it can
be modified in ways that address our issues.

regards
Moazzam


---------------------- Forwarded by Bert Meyers/PDX/ECT on 04/29/2001 08:49
AM ---------------------------

Kalman Gaizler <kgaizler@sempratrading.com> on 04/29/2001 08:17:45 AM
To: "'bert.meyers@enron.com'" <bert.meyers@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Visit

Hi Bert,

I will be arriving in Portland on Thursday, May 17th at 10:30am and I will
be staying at the Westin Portland, 750 SW Alder St.. I would like to stop by
the Enron office on Thursday afternoon at about 2PM and meet the Enron crew.

I would appreciate your help in organizing an outing on Thursday evening.
The outing could be to your favorite restaurant or what-so-ever event that
may be nearby. I hope that you and many of your colleagues will be able to
join me on Thursday, May 17th as my guests.

Also, can you please e-mail me directions to your office.

Regards,

Ken Gaizler
SempraTrading RealTime Desk

****************************************************************************
This e-mail contains privileged attorney-client communications and/or
confidential information, and is only for the use by the intended recipient.
Receipt by an unintended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any
applicable privilege.

Reading, disclosure, discussion, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient or his or her
employees or agents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us and delete the original
material from your computer.

Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SET) is not the same company as SDG&E or
SoCalGas, the utilities owned by SET's parent company.  SET is not regulated
by the California Public Utilities Commission and you do not have to buy
SET's products and services to continue to receive quality regulated service
from the utilities.
****************************************************************************


Count me in. I'll give 10 and enron will match
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cutsforth, Diane
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:33 PM
To:	Bishop, Serena; Runswick, Stacy; Gang, Lisa; Semperger, Cara; DL-Portland Real Time Shift; DL-Portland Volume Mgmt; Crandall, Sean; Scholtes, Diana; Alonso, Tom; Fisher, Mark; Platter, Phillip; Salisbury, Holden; Robinson, Donald
Subject:

August 28, 2001
Hi Everyone!
I'm writing to tell you about an adventure I've committed to this fall! I've registered to participate in the Komen Portland Race for the Cure on September 16th. The Race benefits the Oregon & SW Washington Affiliate of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation and supports the Komen Foundation's mission of eradicating breast cancer as a life-threatening disease by advancing research, education, screening and treatment.
Last year's Portland Race was the most successful ever - more than 40,000 women, men and children participated and helped raise more than $1.5 million for the fight against breast cancer! And while a number of strides have been made in breast cancer research and treatment, the fact remains that approximately one in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer during her lifetime. And although much less common, men also get breast cancer. That's why I'm racing for a cure.
The Race is especially important to me because my step-mother, Carol Cutsforth, died from complications associated with her breast cancer on January 14th, 2000. I am personally contributing to this cause, because I have seen first hand how this disease can cause a life time of suffering and sorrow for those who were close to breast cancer victims, and more than ever I want to help find a cure and help those who are in the fight for their life.
You can join me in my fight against breast cancer without even breaking a sweat!
Would you please consider at least a $5 pledge to support my effort & The Komen Foundation?
My personal goal is to raise $1000.
Donations must be received by October 18th, 2001.
Your contribution is tax-deductible.
The tax number ID of the Oregon & SW Washington Affiliate of the Susan G. Koman Breast Canver Foundation is 93-1068897.
Receipts will be issued for contributions of $100 or more, or upon request.
Thank you for taking the time to read and consider this opportunity. Please contact me if you have any questions, want to learn more about the Komen Portland Race for the Cure, or if you'd like to join us on September 16th!
Thanks again!
Diane Cutsforth


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Stephanie
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Polsky, Phil; Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	FW: humor_bin.swf

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jones, Susan" <susan.jones@neg.pge.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:43 AM
To:	Miller, Stephanie
Subject:	FW: humor_bin.swf

here's my little bin laden video,  hope you enjoy it!!

 http://www.madblast.com/oska/humor_bin.swf

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

 - humor_bin.swf.url


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude28.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas28.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil28.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded28.pdf

Nov WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clx-qox.pdf
Dec Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Dec Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Nov Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-hox.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG28.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG28.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL28.pdf

Scott Oblander
312-762-1015
312-762-1014 fax
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606


Start Date: 10/6/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100615.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


We would need to protest, but of course strategically.  Can we discuss
anything that goes out?

Roger

Mona L Petrochko@ENRON
11/02/2000 04:48 PM

To:   Roger Yang, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:   jdasovic@.enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa
Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  PG&E A/L Setting Interim Value for Hydro

The phoenix keeps rising.  PG&E has submitted a new advice letter seeking
to establish an interim valuation for its remaining hydro assets at $2.8
billion effective June 23,00.

We have 20 days from October 26 to protest.  I would assume we will want to
protest, unless I hear differently.

Thanks.


[IMAGE]

July 02, 2001

Can't read this email? Click here
Issue#: e12906

PROVANTAGE Customer: jeff_dasovich@enron.com

To unsubscribe from the?
Original Advantage Click here
(Do Not Reply to this email)

Products that give you a  PROfessional AdVANTAGE!

[IMAGE]
EtherFast Wireless AP + Cable/DSL Router w/4-Port
By Linksys

Linksys is offering a $30 mail-in rebate on the BEFW11S4 and BEFW11P1. Offer
good June 23 until July 14, 2001! Limit 2 per customer. ...More

??$236.15
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Backup Exec for NT/2000 Server Edition
By Veritas

Protecting data should be as easy as creating the data. Backup Exec provides
an easy-to-use graphical user interface, along with wizards to walk any level
...More

??$478.15
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Montego II Voice Recognition w/Sound Card
By Voyetra Turtle Beach Systems

Enter the world of voice-activated computing!
Whether you enjoy playing games, recording or just listening to music,
Montego II with L&H VoicXpress ...More

??$33.19
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
JBuilder v5.0
By Borland

JBuilder 5 Professional is a comprehensive, award-winning visual development
environment for creating Java 2, platform-independent database and Web
applications. ...More

UPG FROM 4.0 PRO/FOUNDATION??$752.15
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
8-Port MasterView Plus KVM Switch PS2 & AT Support
By Aten

Your business is growing faster than you expected and four computers simply
aren't enough to meet your needs? Not a problem. The eight-port MasterView
...More

??$321.35
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Norton  Personal Firewall 2001 v3.0 for Windows NT
By Symantec

$10 rebate ($15CDN) for owners of all retail (boxed or downloaded),
standalone versions of Norton Personal Firewall 2000, Norton Personal
Firewall ...More

??$41.53
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
50X Reader EIDE ATAPI 128K 150MS 7500KB/Sec
By ASUS

The ASUS CD-S500 breaks through the bottlenecks inherent in traditional
CD-ROM technology with innovative solutions to sustain accuracy and stability
of ...More

??$38.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Rumble-FX Force Feedback Headphones
By Evergreen Technologies

The revolutionary RumbleFX headphones actually shake and vibrate for a
totally addictive sensation that takes the virtual reality of positional
audio all ...More

??$37.43
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
AUA-3100LP Kit USB2Connect HBA 3-Ext/1-Int USB 2.0
By Adaptec

USB 2.0 is the fastest USB standard yet released, supporting data speeds up
to 480 megabits per second (Mbps). That's 40 times faster than USB 1.1. It
...More

??$56.69
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New!

Phaser 860B Printer 16ppm 64MB 1200dpi
By Xerox/Tektronix

Print speeds so fast, you'll need to run to get to the printer before the job
is done. Engineered to be so simple that you will actually love using it. ...
More

??$1934.73
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New!

CanoScan D2400UF Flatbed USB 2400 x 4800dpi PC/Mac
By Canon

Professional Photo and Film Scanning.

For professional-looking projects, you need a scanner that works like a pro.
The CanoScan ...More

??$441.93
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
SmartMedia 32MB 3.3V
By Delkin Devices

SmartMedia is a small, durable flash memory card that works in many different
electronic devices, including Fuji, Olympus, Ricoh, and Agfa digital cameras,
and MP3 audio recorders like the Diamond Rio.

??$23.85
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
nVIDIA GeForce2 MX-400 64MB AGP 4X DVD/3D
By Jaton Corporation

GeForce2 MX400 continues nVIDIA's tradition of bringing leading edge
technology to the mainstream with its cost-effective, integrated VGA, 2D, 3D,
and ...More

??$94.75
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Flipdisk 6-12GB
By Amacom

Flipdisk utilizes a unique patented flip PC card hinge mechanism which folds
away neatly & compactly into the unit - eliminating the need for cumbersome
...More

??$279.45
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
40x/16x/10x Rewritable EIDE Internal
By TEAC America, Inc.

The TEAC 16x10x40 CD-RW drive writes data or audio files at 16X (CD-R),
rewrites at 10X (CD-RW) and can playback at 40X (CD-ROM) speeds, coinciding
with ...More

??$148.71
[IMAGE]

?
?

Web Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com?
?Toll Free: 800-336-1166???? Fax: 330-494-5260???? email:
sales@provantage.com

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FREE Catalog

,2001 PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720

Products, prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time.
Company and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered
trademarks of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be
copyrighted by the product's manufacturer.?

 The Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of
PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in the
past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout process. Or,
customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email List" box on the
PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any
time by going to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm. The email address
is permanently removed from additional promotional electronic mailings, and
will not be reactivated unless requested by the customer.??

 [IMAGE]

BizRate Customer Certified (GOLD) Site


The attached document is from Richard Sanders:


Attached is an Omnibus Confirmation for NG Trading LLC. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call.

Regards,

Brad


Mr. Lay-

With all that is going on, a quick note to let you know that you still have an employee who is confident something good will prevail and not all may be lost.  Though I have only been with the company for almost 2 years, I personally feel you are doing all you can to salvage what is possible.  Your reputation precedes you and the many years you spent building this company up. I feel deep down that you wouldn't have done anything to jeapordize your name despite what the media and finance markets read.  Responsibility is to be shared.  Unfortunately, you have been left to do the clean up.  I do believe in my heart of hearts that once Jeff Skilling and Andy Fastow were in the positions they were, greed took over.  Unfortunately, they took advantage of your position and possibly lost sight of dealings going on with the presumption that these men were of the utmost, outstanding character.

Please view this email as simply a boost to your morale and not anything more than to simply advise you of what possibly many employees feel but have yet to convey.

Thanks -

Sheila Jones Jensen (newlywed)
Enron Broadband Services-Houston, TX
Global Bandwidth Risk Management
713 853 9131 office
713 419 9478 cell
713 646 8795 fax


I have arranged a tentative agreement with Bowne Business Solutions (13th
floor graphics) to provide content digitization, encoding and storage for
video productions.  They will have the capability to output from S-VHS, Beta
SP and electronic sources, along with minimal editing and creation of basic
multimedia images suitable for the Enron channel.  Additional costs would be
incurred by individual departments incrementally as they produced video
content for the monitors.  Enron would then have a choice of vendors,
including the in-house graphics group, Innovision (Beth Stier) and others.

We also need to determine the point of demarcation for the "head-end" of the
video signal for these and any other building monitors.  I don't know if your
estimates include any of this head-end equipment which would include VTRs,
modulators, distribution amplifiers, CATV contracts and receivers, satellite,
etc.  Regardless, we need to talk to the folks who will be producing content
for these monitors to see what types of capabilities they want to have.

Finally, someone will have to "own" the channel and pre-approve content for
distribution.  I'm pretty certain that Mark Palmer wants to control the
content, though I don't think that he wants to manage the production group,
or create any overkill.

I'd be happy to discuss alternatives with all of you for the content side of
this project.  Again, I think that the costs will be incremental expenses
related to creating content rather than capital outlay.

Beth, Mark, Pam, Setev, Terrie, et al. - Are you interested in addressing
what in-house capabilities you'd like to have with me?

DMM

To: Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON

cc: Pam Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Mims/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Terrie
James/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Video Screens in EB Elevator Cabs

Beth, Mark -

I think we are ready to move on implementing flat screen monitors in all of
Enron Building passenger elevator cabs, i.e. proposal is for two 14" monitors
per cab, one for Corporate content, other for local Houston messages.  Will
try to flush mount them in the stainless steel cab panels, for a clean,
attractive look.

Technical details have generally been worked out between our group (Steve
Woods and Harry Grubbs) and Enron's IT Dept.  such that  we know total costs
are below $500K (more in $350-400K range plus whatever temporary,
non-elevator monitors appropriate for Three Allen Center occupants).  We have
a 3 month implementation schedule.

Content can be anything available on Enron's LAN (developed @ the desk top)
or any video signal, i.e. Cable TV stations, tapes, etc.

Let me know next steps.  We can discuss funding sources.  - Bill