Dear LYSA:

I can only apologize profusely.

Profuse apologies,
Jeff

	Lysa Akin@ECT
	11/16/2000 01:10 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Regarding Reserving the Park Hyatt for the California Legislative
Meeting

Jeff -

I am more than happy to work with the Park Hyatt to reserve a room.

However, I will only do it on the condition that you make a concerted effort
to spell my name correctly.
My mother would greatly appreciate you acknowledging the vast amounts of
drugs she was on when she filled out my birth certificate!!  :-)

Consider it done.

With mucho giggles,
Lysa

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 11/16/2000 01:12 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CHANGE OF DATE: California Legislative Meeting in San Francisco
- MARK YOUR CALENDARS!!

Lisa:  Sorry, but Joseph's gone on vacation for the week.  I think that the
size of the group is going to require that we do this offsite.  We use the
"Park Hyatt" in San Francisco.  Could you check with Paul and let him know
that I think that we need to go offsite, given the size of the crowd, and if
he agrees, could you go ahead and check into getting a room at the Park
Hyatt?  As always, I'm greatly indebted.  If there are any problems, or if
you have any questions, don't hesitate to give me a call.

Best,
Jeff

	Lysa Akin@ECT
	11/16/2000 10:37 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, mday@gmssr.com, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron, mcortez@govadv.com, Sue Nord/NA/Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron
		 cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT
		 Subject: CHANGE OF DATE: California Legislative Meeting in San Francisco -
MARK YOUR CALENDARS!!

Per Rick Shapiro, pllease be advised that the meeting referenced above has
been changed as follows:

Date: Tuesday, December 5th
Time: 9:00am - 1:30pm Pacific
Where: San Francisco Office

At this time, Paul would prefer to keep this as an internal GA meeting with
our outside lobbyists.  At this time we are not inviting the Enron Business
units to attend, but please feel free to invite anyone else in the GA group
you feel should attend.

HOWEVER, if you invite someone else, please advise me so that we can ensure
we have adequate space in San Francisco to accommodate everyone.  Thanks!

Melissa Cortez - please forward to Scott AND Hedy.  Also, I will forward
directions to our offices to you under a separate e-mail.

Lysa Akin
503/464-7927

---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 11/16/2000 08:35 AM
---------------------------

Lysa Akin
11/14/2000 04:52 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, mday@gmssr.com, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron,
mcortez@govadv.com, Sue Nord/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron
Subject: California Legislative Meeting in San Francisco

Please be advised that I have scheduled the above referenced meeting as
follows:

Date: Tuesday, November 28th
Time: 10:30am - 3:30pm Pacific
Where: San Francisco Office

Most of you "penciled in" this appointment when I spoke to you, please make
plans to attend!!

At this time, Paul would prefer to keep this as an internal GA meeting with
our outside lobbyists.  At this time we are not inviting the Enron Business
units to attend, but please feel free to invite anyone else in the GA group
you feel should attend.  HOWEVER, if you invite someone else, please advise
me so that we can ensure we have adequate space in San Francisco to
accommodate everyone.  Thanks!

Melissa Cortez - please forward to Scott AND Hedy.

Jim Steffes & Marcia Linton - I am aware that Jim is on vacation the week of
the 27th.  In the event that he can participate via teleconference, I will
forward a dial in number by the end of the week.

Lysa Akin
503/464-7927


Would you get me all the contract details on this capacity and email it to me?

thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 12:13
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           11/21/2000 01:27 PM

To: Angel Fuller/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry
Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Virginia Natural Gas...Columbia Gas

Angel,

Steve Gillespie is managing the day to day operations of the VNG asset mgt.
deal for our logistics group.  Please include him with your queries.  It is
my understanding that we are agents for all of their contracts and we pay all
their transport costs.  In turn, we invoice them and they re-imburse us for
that transport.

Chris Germany and Scott Goodell in the Transportation Trading Group  are
responsible for setting these contracts in UNIFY.  All of these contracts in
question are storage or transportation tied to storage. Chris/Scott please
set up the 5 valid contracts below in UNIFY as soon as possible....Contract
37634 is terminated effective 8/31/1999.

If you have any questions please let us know.
Victor

Angel Fuller@ENRON
11/21/2000 09:47 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H
Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Virginia Natural Gas...Columbia Gas

Hi Joann and Alvin,

As you know, effective October 1, ENA became agent for Virginia Natural Gas.
Here in Volume Management, as I try to load beginning balances and actualize
volumes (so that I can pay VNG's transportation charges) for 10/2000, it
appears that the following contracts for VNG/Cgas are not in Unify.

Contract Number  Type
38079    FSS...Master Contract
35889    x-133 LNG Storage
60536    SST
37634    ISS
53004    FSS
60537    FSS

I would appreciate any help you can give me in getting these contracts in
Unify as soon as possible.  If you have any questions or need additional
information, please let me know.

Thanks,
Angel


Attached is a letter we are sending to Sen. Dunn today.  Any questions,
please call me.  We should not be discussing in public.

Thanks,

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 05/02/2001
02:14 PM ---------------------------
From: Richard B Sanders@ECT on 05/02/2001 02:06 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Letter to Larry Drivon

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 02:05 PM -----

	"Chen, Jane " <JChen@brobeck.com>
	05/02/2001 02:03 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Letter to Larry Drivon

Mr. Sanders,

 For your review.

 <<Letter to Senator Dunn - 5201.DOC>>

Thank you.
jane

Jane Chen
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, LLP
Assistant to Gary Fergus & Kirstin Wolf
SF ext. 2944
SF rm. 2917c
DD (415) 979-2944

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - Letter to Senator Dunn - 5201.DOC


Please read the note below from Jeff at Lone Star, it looks like we may need to be particular for May.  Of cause that would involve me knowing a little more about the pipeline.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	jeffsmirin@txu.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:10 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Ponderosa Pines Energy

The nominations are due by April 29th at 2:00 P.M.  Also you need to know
that on May 7th through May 9th, TXU LSP will be replacing a piece of our
Line X Pipeline just to the east of the Ponderosa plant.  This means that
what gas you bring in from West Texas will have to match pretty much what
you burn.  Since this part of the pipeline will be cut off from the rest of
the pipeline there will be no way to handle swings in usage on the pipeline
during this time period.

I you have any questions please give me a call at 214-875-5185.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 04/24/2002 07:12:19 AM

To:    jeffsmirin@txu.com
cc:
Subject:    RE: Ponderosa Pines Energy

Hey Jeff, when are noms for the 1st due?

Thanks

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Gary,  Looks good with one exception.  Per Tana Jones's earlier request of
revising the
Subject Line to read "PLEASE READ" not "Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge
Exemption Applications".
She wants to capture her audience.

Ok to proceed with the above revision.  Thank you for your assistance.

Taffy Milligan
Sr. Admin Assistant
EWS-Legal
Tele: 713-345-7373
Fax:  713-646-6058

	Mark Taylor (Vice President and General Counsel)@ENRON
	Sent by: Enron Messaging Administration@ENRON
	06/05/2001 10:18 AM

		 To: Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Messaging Administration/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: DRAFT- PLEASE READ

Good morning Ms. Milligan,

Please review and submit approval to Enron Messaging Administration.  The
note will be sent this evening to the NYMEX Hedge Exemption List (this list
includes: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT Calgary,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT New York and
Everyone_in_ECT_Denver).

We are trying to get approval to send the message out ASAP as requested;
until approval is received, the message is scheduled to be distributed this
evening.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria
Enron Messaging Administration

To:        Department:   ENA Legal

From:  Mark Taylor     Date: May 11, 2001
  Vice President and General Counsel

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related
commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person
pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


FYI.  Per my voice message to you yesterday.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/08/2000 11:51 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	12/08/2000 09:39 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <BillR@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <glwaas@calpx.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>,
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <KEWH@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
<foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
<Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com>, <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
<Roger.Pelote@Williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: R0010002 Mattson Ruling

For those WPTF members who are interested in following?the  interruptible OII
at the CPUC, ALJ Mattson issued a ruling yesterday concerning  future filings
and the scope of the matters to be covered in them.
?
This ruling clarifies that respondents and parties should not delay making
proposals on curtailment and other issues.? He directs that, "respondents
and parties should, within seven days of the date of this ruling, file and
serve  proposals that address each of the four items in Ordering Paragraph 1
of the  Rulemaking, including curtailment issues:
(a)? "the role of customers on  a utility,s interruptible tariffs to ensure
reliable and reasonably-priced  electric service in California, especially
for the Summer of 2001;
(b)?  coordinate the variety of interruptible, curtailable and demand
responsiveness  programs being offered and proposed in California;
(c)? identify  alternative means for customers to reduce their energy usage
during periods of  peak demand; and
(d)? "to revise and update the Commission,s priorities  for curtailing
customers during times of energy shortages."? (R.00-10-002,  Ordering
Paragraph 1, page 15.)?
Further, to the extent proposals filed  December 4, 2000 do not address
improved curtailment notification measures,  respondents and parties may file
and serve additional proposals.? For  example, respondents and parties may
address the feasibility, desirability and  cost of creating phone banks or
using electronic mail to notify customers before  curtailments (e.g., rolling
blackouts).? Comments on proposals filed and  served seven days from today
may be filed and served within seven days after  proposals are filed."
?
A copy of the ruling is attached for your information.
?
Dan
Received: from dymwsm08.mailwatch.com by ArterHadden.com; Thu, 07 Dec 2000
19:00:13 -0500
Received: from dymw0114.mailwatch.com (dymw0114.allegro.net [204.253.83.107])
by dymwsm08.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id eB800I807848 for
<douglass@arterhadden.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:00:18 -0500
Received: from 204.253.83.34 by dymw0114.mailwatch.com with SMTP (
WorldSecure Server SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.3); Thu, 07 Dec 00 19:00:06 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: 17085090-7ecb-11d4-ba0b-00508bd371a2
Received: from [134.186.70.194] (nic.cpuc.ca.gov [162.15.7.1]) by
dymwsm12.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id eB8004e29390 for
<douglass@arterhadden.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:00:04 -0500
Received: from nic.cpuc.ca.gov by [134.186.70.194] via smtpd (for
mail.mailwatch.com [204.253.83.157]) with SMTP; 7 Dec 2000 23:58:47 UT
Received: from [162.15.7.254] (exchserver1 [162.15.5.63]) by nic.cpuc.ca.gov
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA16921; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from no.name.available by [162.15.7.254] via smtpd (for
nic.cpuc.ca.gov [162.15.7.1]) with SMTP; 7 Dec 2000 23:57:35 UT
Received: by EXCHSERVER1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<YNG1RV17>; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:58:53 -0800
Message-ID: <11E42F27414DD411B86300005A42A7B016888C@EXCHSERVER2>
From: "Mattson, Burton" <bwm@cpuc.ca.gov>
To: "'aweller@sel.com'" <aweller@sel.com>,   "'kmccrea@sablaw.com'"
<kmccrea@sablaw.com>,   "'defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil'"
<defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil>,   "'rcsstl@cdmnet.com'"
<rcsstl@cdmnet.com>,   "'jsmollon@newwestenergy.com'"
<jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,   "'napedersen@jonesday.com'"
<napedersen@jonesday.com>,   "'athomas@newenergy.com'"
<athomas@newenergy.com>,   "'sschwartz@kelleydrye.com'"
<sschwartz@kelleydrye.com>,   "'lisa_g_urick@calpx.com'"
<lisa_g_urick@calpx.com>,   "'douglass@arterhadden.com'"
<douglass@arterhadden.com>,   "'bruce.reed@sce.com'" <bruce.reed@sce.com>,
"'jleslie@luce.com'" <jleslie@luce.com>,   "'pszymanski@sempra.com'"
<pszymanski@sempra.com>,   "'fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov'"
<fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov>,   "'reechpubpol@mail.com'" <reechpubpol@mail.com>,
"'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'" <furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>,
"Scarff, James E." <jes@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'marcel@turn.org'"
<marcel@turn.org>,   "'joe_como@ci.sf.ca.us'" <joe_como@ci.sf.ca.us>,
"'cgilson@fbm.com'" <cgilson@fbm.com>,   "'jnnc@chevron.com'"
<jnnc@chevron.com>,   "'jlondon@gralegal.com'" <jlondon@gralegal.com>,
"'jlondon@gralegal.com'" <jlondon@gralegal.com>,   "'eke@aelaw.com'"
<eke@aelaw.com>,   "'jsqueri@gmssr.com'" <jsqueri@gmssr.com>,
"'jsqueri@gmssr.com'" <jsqueri@gmssr.com>,   "'jbennett@gmssr.com'"
<jbennett@gmssr.com>,   "'jkarp@whitecase.com'" <jkarp@whitecase.com>,
"'pbeter@newpower.com'" <pbeter@newpower.com>,   "'rgex@skjerven.com'"
<rgex@skjerven.com>,   "'edwardoneill@dwt.com'" <edwardoneill@dwt.com>,
"'anne@plurimi.com'" <anne@plurimi.com>, "'dfc2@pge.com'" <dfc2@pge.com>,
"'ssmyers@hooked.net'" <ssmyers@hooked.net>,   "'wbooth@booth-law.com'"
<wbooth@booth-law.com>,   "'mgomez1@bart.gov'" <mgomez1@bart.gov>,
"'pjpowerlaw@aol.com'" <pjpowerlaw@aol.com>,
"'nryan@environmentaldefense.org'" <nryan@environmentaldefense.org>,
"'apak@energyharbor.com'" <apak@energyharbor.com>,
"'brbarkovich@earthlink.net'" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>,
"'bill@jbsenergy.com'" <bill@jbsenergy.com>,   "'janders@caiso.com'"
<janders@caiso.com>,   "'abb@eslawfirm.com'" <abb@eslawfirm.com>,
"'dcarroll@dbsr.com'" <dcarroll@dbsr.com>, "'ed@clfp.com'" <ed@clfp.com>,
"'jdh@eslawfirm.com'" <jdh@eslawfirm.com>,   "'lmh@eslawfirm.com'"
<lmh@eslawfirm.com>,   "'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us'"
<jtachera@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'kmills@cfbf.com'" <kmills@cfbf.com>,
"'aorchar@smud.org'" <aorchar@smud.org>, "'mpa@aelaw.com'" <mpa@aelaw.com>,
"'dws@keywaycorp.com'" <dws@keywaycorp.com>,   "'vwatkins@pira.com'"
<vwatkins@pira.com>,   "'robert.d.schasel@fritolay.com'"
<robert.d.schasel@fritolay.com>,   "'dnorris@sppc.com'" <dnorris@sppc.com>,
"'mwynne@gridservices.com'" <mwynne@gridservices.com>,
"'Melanie_s_cibik@teledyne.com'" <Melanie_s_cibik@teledyne.com>,
"'bruce.reed@sce.com'" <bruce.reed@sce.com>,   "'mshames@ucan.org'"
<mshames@ucan.org>,   "'GJMF@PUCINC.COM'" <GJMF@PUCINC.COM>,
"'Dkolk@compenergy.com'" <Dkolk@compenergy.com>,
"'ewills@globalfrontiers.com'" <ewills@globalfrontiers.com>,
"'lhubbard@sempra.com'" <lhubbard@sempra.com>,   "'bfinkelstein@turn.org'"
<bfinkelstein@turn.org>,   "Cauchois, Scott" <wsc@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'phanschen@mofo.com'" <phanschen@mofo.com>,   "'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'"
<rschmidt@bartlewells.com>,   "'luluw@newsdata.com'" <luluw@newsdata.com>,
"'sdg6@pge.com'" <sdg6@pge.com>,   "'rochmanm@cubjpa.org'"
<rochmanm@cubjpa.org>,   "'bchen@newenergy.com'" <bchen@newenergy.com>,
"'difellman@energy-law-group.com'" <difellman@energy-law-group.com>,
"'mccann@cal.net'" <mccann@cal.net>,   "'crobinson@caiso.com'"
<crobinson@caiso.com>,   "'twetzel@thermoecotek.com'"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,   "'pstohr@dbsr.com'" <pstohr@dbsr.com>,
"'karen@klindh.com'" <karen@klindh.com>,   "Stevens, Maria E."
<mer@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Schumacher, Brian D." <bds@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Mattson,
Burton" <bwm@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Danforth, Christopher" <ctd@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"Lafrenz, Donald J." <dlf@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Smith, Don" <dsh@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"Hendry, James" <jeh@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Morse, Jay" <jxm@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Fitch,
Julie" <jf2@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Martin, Laura A." <lra@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Ziering,
Mark" <maz@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Chavez, Moises" <mcv@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Kinosian,
Robert" <gig@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Strauss, Robert L." <rls@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Casey,
Sean F." <sfc@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'dfukumot@energy.state.ca.us'"
<dfukumot@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'kgriffin@energy.state.ca.us'"
<kgriffin@energy.state.ca.us>,   "Schultz, Don" <dks@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'mjaske@energy.state.ca.us'" <mjaske@energy.state.ca.us>,   "Greenspan,
Randi" <rsg@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'mmesseng@energy.state.ca.us'"
<mmesseng@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'mrudman@energy.state.ca.us'"
<mrudman@energy.state.ca.us>
Subject: R0010002 Mattson Ruling
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:58:47 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-WSS-ID: 162EFB0C38333-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C060A9.A5562680"

DATE:?? December 7, 2000

TO:???? ??????? Service List in R.00-10-002

FROM:?? Burton W. Mattson
??????? ??????? Administrative Law Judge

Subject:??????? Ruling

Please find attached below a ruling in R.00-10-002.?

For clarification, the additional proposals and comments covered therein may
be as broad as any party wishes, but are intended to address Summer 2001.?

?
 - CPUC01-#85215-v1-R0010002_Mattson_Ruling.DOC


The train wreck known as California utility crisis continues along.  Democrats are turning on one another in the aftermath of the Assembly's failure to pass a SoCal bailout plan.  Meanwhile, talk of direct access is threatening to undercut the PUC's ability to hike rates, Davis' plans to issue bonds for a SoCal bailout, and the California state budget.

RJ

1.	Bryson and Davis Moving To Unseat Burton

There is a serious effort currently underway in California to unseat Senator Burton (D-San Francisco), President Pro Tem.   Even though the chances of this happening are relatively low, John Bryson, CEO of SoCal, with the support of the Governor, are making huge efforts to oust Burton and replace him with one of two potential candidates - Richard Alarcon (D-San Fernando Valley), Majority Whip or Sheila Kuehl (D-Los Angeles).  Alarcon has already stated that he would not accept the position.  However, at minimum, Bryson, Governor Davis and/or other Senators hope that Burton will rethink his position on the MOU and a SoCal bailout.

2.	Direct Access Talk a Serious Problem for SoCal and California Budget

Additionally, behind the scenes, things are looking very grim for California due the implications of Direct Access.  "Direct access," or the right of large companies and municipalities to buy power directly in the wholesale market, is fast emerging as a new and serious issue that could make a rescue of SoCal more difficult. It could also complicate existing state plans for the California electricity market and the proposed municipal bond sale, well placed Sacramento sources tell us.
The biggest opponent of Direct Access comes from the Governor's office as they realize the potential effects of direct access and how it could undermine the revenue stream supporting the bond issuance for SoCal.

For those interested in more on Direct Access keep reading:

Trying to stop municipalities from opting out of the state power plans will be extremely difficult, as it runs against some of the most entrenched and long-standing privileges in California politics. Under California law, it is very difficult to stop many cities doing what they please. Most older and larger cities are "charter cities" rather than "general law cities" subject to the California Municipal code. Under the California Constitution, charter cities can "pretty much do anything or provide any service short of printing money and raising an army," says one source. The League of California cities - a weighty organization representing every one of California's cities - is already swinging into action to support direct access. Most Assembly Democrats started out as City councillors and have some sympathy with local independence. And the resistance within the Assembly is already building against Hertzberg's attempts to stop even large companies getting direct access.

Some city leaders will not wish to fight the Governor and the state legislature on the issue. But if municipalities do not opt out, they may have to explain to their local business and voters why they are paying far more for electricity than a city next door which chooses to set up its own power company. Cities are beginning to realize they might potentially lose major employers. Politicians are also beginning to realize that local companies stand to gain or lose a fortune on the matter, and this could affect campaign contributions.

State power plans at risk

If municipalities do move to set up their own power companies, it could undermine at least three key elements of the State of California's power plans:
?	First, the rate hike already approved falls mostly on businesses and other large users. But municipal power would unpick this structure, allow large regions of California to ignore the PUC, leaving the rate structure to be determined city by city. Many municipalities may be unable to resist pressure from local businesses to protect them from disproportionate rate hikes. Others might cave into irate voters;
?	Second, the plans laid out by Governor Davis' and State Treasurer Angelides' for a California State Public Power Authority would also be badly damaged if large regions avoid having anything to do with it. "It is possible that long-term power contracts might also face an additional hurdle if municipalities opt out of higher long-term rates by buying on the open market," one source says. "It could mean the state is left with excess power that it would have to sell at a loss;"
?	Third, revenues to back the proposed power bonds could be imperilled, if municipalities opt out of the rate structure and revenue stream needed to repay the bond. And if the momentum for direct access develops among the cities and municipalities across the state, it could make it much more difficult to launch the bond in the first place as investors may take fright at potential threats to the viability of repayments.

The issue is at an early stage -- the PUC had a general workshop on the matter at its offices in San Francisco on Friday. So far, the matter has been seen as a micro technical issue rather than as one of the biggest hurdles the state will have to face. State legislative leaders are likely to use every political and legal means available to stop municipal secession, or at least smother the issue until the power bond is successfully away. But stopping the municipalities if they choose to follow this path could prove to be difficult


Doug,

Thanks.

Vince

Doug Leach
01/11/2000 07:32 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: promotion

Vince,

Congrats on your promotion to MD.

Doug


Please take me off your distribution.  I already bought my new car.  Thank
youl.


As a reminder, the state of Texas requires releases of natural gas greater
than 119 mscf  to the atmosphere (in a 24 hour period), to be reported to the
Regional Offices of the TNRCC.  These releases include but may not be limited
to the following:  ESD's, startups, shutdowns, pipeline ruptures and
maintenance activities.  Should any of the above activities release natural
gas in excess of 119 mscf, a written notification should be faxed to the
Regional Office of the TNRCC  within the following timeframes:

 Unanticipated Upsets- within 24 hours after the discovery of the upset.

 Maintenance, Startup or Shutdowns- 10 day prior to the expected exceedance.

This reminder is being sent to all ET&S teams within Texas because in the
last two Northern Natural Gas compressor station inspections conducted by the
TNRCC,  they specifically requested backup data and reporting documentation
of the natural gas releases to the atmosphere which were greater than 119
mscf.  The agency's  inquiry specifically addressed knowledge of compressor
station venting for ESD, start ups and shutdowns.

It should also be mentioned that there has been inconsistencies in the
TNRCC's position regarding this issue.  However, until a position has been
adopted by Enron's GPG, I am recommending that each facility comply and
report as appropriate.

The fax numbers for the following Regional offices are as follows:

 Midland (915)  570-4795    Included facilities-  Wt-2, Walton, Keystone,
Lone Star Valero, Spraberry, Seminole

 Lubbock (806)  796-7107  Included facilities-  P-2, Plainview, Brownfield

 San Angelo (915)  658-5431  Included facilities- Reagan Co. 2, Irion Co. 1,
Eldorado

Reporting forms for the release can be faxed to your location by request by
contacting me at (505) 625-8022.


Can you clarify for me how the agency fee is suppose to be calculated?  I am getting mixed information.  I know that we use the higher of the two volumes (receipts vs. deliveries).  The question is do we use the nom volume or the actual volume.  Last month (March), we left the volume at the nom of 45,000/day.  In the past , we have changed the volume to the actual daily volume.  For April, the actuals are higher than the nom and we would need to bump the volume up to 47,089/day.  James Armstrong is using the actual volume.  The deal for the fee is 514353.

My other problem is that the spreadsheet is choosing the max of three volumes, receipts, deliveries and transport.  Should the transport volume be in the calculation?  Also, Mark added some payback volume to the spreadsheet and it is being included in the receipt volume.   Do I include the payback volume in the calculation of the agency fee if we use the nom?  If you have a copy of the contract that addresses the agency fee, I would like to have a copy.  You can fax it to 713-571-3141.  If none of this makes sense, give me a call and I can try and explain further.

Thanks,
Megan
713-571-3261


I will get this to you tomorrow morning.

	Brant Reves
	02/12/2001 04:04 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gregory Schockling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Exxon credit

Gerald,

Anyway we can move this up on your action items?

thanks
brant

Gregory Schockling@ENRON
02/12/2001 03:57 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Exxon credit

BRant,

I got a call from my contact at Exxon regarding the PG your working on.
Vicki Brown needs the paprework as soon as possible, they only have 2 days of
credit left with us and we're buying some day gas from them.

Let me know the status or if I can help

Thanks

Greg Schockling


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 10/27/2000
06:51 AM ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder@ECT
10/27/2000 05:00 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Energy Services Coaltion-Visit To London, Friday, December1

I guess because of the way the message was sent to me, I cannot include text
in return, but responding to your question of what does Joe's last comment
mean, presumably, it is that on these issues of WTO, I am not competent to
advise you on them.  Leaving that aside, I further suspect that he sees me as
the bette noir of the WTO ESC effort.  Finally, you might talk to Tom
Briggs.  I think Joe has stood Tom's position on its head.  Joe has argued
that we need to be in the ESC, because other things we care about like
financial services regulation and e-commerce will be implicated.  He says Tom
argues that we must liberalise energy to realise these objectives.  As I
understand Tom (and he can speak for himself), if we do not get energy
services liberalised (and the exclusion of third-party access is tantamount
to not getting energy services liberalised) then the make-weight arguments
about e-commerce and financial services fall away, at least as
props/arguments for continuing the ESC.    talk to you later today   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 10/27/2000
06:51 AM ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder@ECT
10/27/2000 05:06 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Energy Services

I had shared my note to you with Peter.  Thought you would find his reply
comment of interest.  Peter and I are both very frustrated/disappointed (you
probably knew that), but I think Joe knows it, too, which further explains
his derogatory comment about us in London.  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 27/10/2000
11:07 ---------------------------

Peter Styles
27/10/2000 10:36
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: Energy Services

Raggett intervention likely attributable to Exxon again. I warned Joe and Bob
Fisher about their insidious influence in April when I went to Washington.
Also at that time Bob, Chris and I talked in detail about how to get TPA onto
agenda through a coda or ancillary agreement to basic service provision/
investment categorisation, as happened for telecom in GATS. Who took their
eye off the ball?

Mark Schroeder
10/24/2000 05:35 PM
To: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Energy Services

my note, and the attachment to which it refers, are self-explanatory, and
have obviously made me very unhappy.  What a waste of time and money by
Joe!   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 24/10/2000
16:36 ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder
24/10/2000 16:32
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Energy Services

Tom Briggs was good enough to forward to me a piece of correspondence that
Joe Hillings apparently shared with him.  My lack of enthusiasm for our WTO
initiative, I know, has hardly been masked, but, frankly, what is contained
in the incoming letter, below, I find quite disconcerting.  I have argued
that in our key markets, e.g., Europe, Japan, etc. (I am assuming we do not
need it in the USA, even today) the WTO initiative, i.e., liberalisation of
energy siervices, would be of little value by the time it was implemented.  I
had, apparently mistakenly, at least assumed that liberalisation of energy
siervices at a minimum meant third-party access to transmission networks.  If
not, then what the heck are we doing in this fight.  BUT, as you will see
from the incoming, below, when Paul Hennemeyer, of my team here in London,
joined Joe and Bob Fisher in Geneva to do a presentation on liberalisation of
energy services in WTO, it provoked a letter, to which Joe responded, saying
that the US Energy Services Coalition has NEVER taken a position on thrid
party access, and it is doubtful they could agree to such a position (Joe
agreed, and said this was just an Enron company position!).  You can probably
guess my position on this, but I thought I would forward this to you for your
information, and, if warranted, follow up, as the conversations we have had
have never led me to believe that either of you thought we were pursuing a
WTO initiative which did NOT involve third party access.   thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 24/10/2000
16:03 ---------------------------
From: Tom Briggs@ENRON on 24/10/2000 06:49 CST
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Energy Services

Mark and Paul:   It seems that Paul's enthustastic and brilliant presentation
may have upset a few people.  Oh dear.  If we continue to push TPA as a
prerequisite to energy services and trading, we might jeopardise the whole
WTO process.  Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 10/24/2000 06:46 AM -----

	Joe Hillings
	10/24/2000 06:25 AM

		 To: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, rcfisher@hillsandco.com,
don.deline@halliburton.com, cbcapstrat@aol.com,
tim.richards@corporate.ge.com, 75361.622@compuserve.com, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Energy Services

Joe Hillings
Enron
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC  20006
202-466-9145
202-828-3372 (fax)
email:  jhillin@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron on 10/24/2000 08:23 AM -----

	Joe Hillings
	10/24/2000 05:15 AM

		 To: "Raggett, Brian" <Brian.Raggett@ogp.be>
		 cc: "'Joe.hillings@, "Arscott, Lyn"<lyn.arscott, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron,
Bob Fisher, Brian Petty, Tim Richards, Don Deline, Christina Bolton, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron,
		 Subject: RE: Energy Services

Joe Hillings
Enron
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC  20006
202-466-9145
202-828-3372 (fax)
email:  jhillin@enron.com

Brian: Thank you for your thoughtful and complete statement of the issue. The
ESC has not taken any position on the regulatory details of market access nor
advocated any such as Third Party Access although Enron certainly has taken a
public position at the EU and other venues preferring TPA but willing to be
practical about  the issue. I greatly appreciate your cutting through to the
concern. It is helpful and hopefully will help us in future presentations; I
know it will help me.

Regards,

Joe

	"Raggett, Brian" <Brian.Raggett@ogp.be>
	10/24/2000 04:50 AM

		 To: "'Joe.hillings@enron.com'" <Joe.hillings@enron.com>
		 cc: "Arscott, Lyn" <lyn.arscott@ogp.org.uk>
		 Subject: RE: Energy Services

Joe:

Having raised the matter covered by the exchange of e-mails between yourself
and Lyn, I feel I should clarify my observations of the meeting at the WTO.

I am confident that the WTO representatives were better informed and
enlightened by the presentations given by the ESC. I am sure they were also
struck, as was I, by Paul's enthusiastic explanation of the range of
innovative energy services offered by Enron. What sparked my concern was the
reference to access to energy networks.

Personally, I do not and, more importantly, nor does OGP take a position on
TPA in the EU, to which you refer in your communication. Even more so in the
context of the WTO, because it has never been discussed. I surmise though,
that other ESC members would have similar  reservations. My concerns were
heightened by questions on the subject raised by one or two of our
interlocutors. This part of the discussion then broadened somewhat and
included information about a court case in Germany to overcome entrenched
opposition to TPA by certain network operator(s). I know not whom.

I believe it would be a pity if the broader aspects of energy services,
supported generally by the ESC became subsumed by a debate on TPA , to
either nationally or privately owned networks, to which some WTO governments
outside Europe and the United States, maybe opposed.

While I detected concerns about this in the questions asked, I don't think
that the baby was thrown away with the bath-water. It is my view, however,
that the ESC should be cautious about raising an issue which some
governments  may perceive to be outside what they think is a more reasonable
agenda, and to which, rightly or wrongly, they have antipathy.  My concern
is that this may then  be used to forestall  the worthy and, perhaps, more
achievable objectives of  the ESC to include  the wide range of services
advocated, in the main, by Paul and by the others who presented.

I  most certainly have a positive view on the value of your work and I hope
this helps.

I am not sure at this point whether I will be available to join you in
London but I am planning to attend the  conference on November 27 and I look
forward to meeting you and Bob once again.

Kind regards,

Brian

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Arscott, Lyn [SMTP:Lyn.Arscott@ogp.org.uk]
 Sent: 23 October 2000 18:02
 To: Raggett, Brian
 Subject: FW: Energy Services

 FYI

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Joe.Hillings@enron.com [mailto:Joe.Hillings@enron.com]
 Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 4:53 PM
 To: Lyn.Arscott@ogp.org.uk
 Subject: RE: Energy Services

 Joe Hillings
 Enron
 1775 Eye Street, NW
 Suite 800
 Washington, DC  20006
 202-466-9145
 202-828-3372 (fax)
 email:  jhillin@enron.com

 Lynn: Thank you for your response. Bob Fisher and I look forward to
meeting
 you, Brian Raggett and possibly others in London on Friday, December
1. We
 will be pleased to host lunch and would be grateful if you could
select the
 restaurant. Should another time be more convenient with you, please
let me
 know.

 From your response regarding the comment in Geneva, I am not feeling
that I
 addressed the specifics of your concern so at the risk of prolonging
the
 pain I'll make another stab at a response. If the concern centers on
 liberalization of transmission access for electricity and natural
gas, I
 would respond that we want to see the EU electricity and natural gas
 directives fully implemented. The EU had asked member countries to
fully
 implement transmission access and it is being accomplished in a
phased in
 approach. Some member countries are doing it in a way that makes
energy
 services possible, some to a less degree and so far, France has not
adopted
 the implementing legislation which is a subject of concern to the
EU.

 The opening up of markets to the maximum degree possible is a broad
goal of
 the Energy Services Coalition recognizing that this is a position
that has
 to be negotiated. We have not recommended any specific regulatory
system or
 regime.

 If I am still missing your concern, please bear with me and bring me
in
 closer to any concern that you may have.

 Regards and best wishes.

 Joe

                     Lora Sullivan

                                          To:     Joe
 Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
                     10/23/2000           cc:

                     11:35 AM             Subject:     RE: Energy
Services

 Lora Sullivan
 Federal Government Affairs Representative
 Enron
 1775 Eye Street, NW
 Suite 800
 Washington, DC  20006
 202-466-9142
 202-828-3372 (fax)
 email:  lsulliv@enron.com
 ----- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 10/23/2000 11:35 AM
-----

                     "Arscott, Lyn"

                     <Lyn.Arscott@o        To:
 "'Lora.Sullivan@enron.com'"
                     gp.org.uk>            <Lora.Sullivan@enron.com>

                                           cc:     "Raggett, Brian"
 <Brian.Raggett@ogp.be>
                     10/23/2000            Subject:     RE: Energy
Services

                     11:11 AM

 Joe,
      I am sorry that you were unable to telephone but I know the
reason.
 Our system has been down for upgrading. We had to expand our
bandwidth to
 accommodate the modern volume of email telephone line traffic.
Sorry.
      In response to your itinerary, I will be in town on Dec 1. I
will
 ask Brian Raggett to join us if he can and we can see if there is
any one
 else. The issue that arose at the last meeting in Geneva seems to
center
 around the special problems  of inclusion of pipelines and
electrical lines
 as part of energy services.
      Brian Raggett was at the Geneva meeting and has a first hand
 interpretation of the meeting.

           Lyn

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Lora.Sullivan@enron.com [mailto:Lora.Sullivan@enron.com]
 Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:51 PM
 To: Lyn.Arscott%ogp.org.uk.@enron.com
 Subject: Energy Services

                     Joe Hillings

                                          To:     Joe
 Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
                     10/23/2000           cc:
75361.622@compuserve.com,
 Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
                     10:25 AM             Subject:     Energy
Services

 Joe Hillings
 Enron
 1775 Eye Street, NW
 Suite 800
 Washington, DC  20006
 202-466-9145
 202-828-3372 (fax)
 email:  jhillin@enron.com

 Lynn: I have been unable to get through on your telephone line this
morning
 so will attempt to fax this and accompanying message to you as
recommended
 by Brian Petty.

 If it is not fully responsive to the questions raised regarding our
 presentation to the WTO in Geneva, please feel free to contact me.
Neither
 the ESC nor Enron advocates any abregation of contract. Further, the
ESC
 has not specifically advocated any regulatory system and has no
plans to do
 so. We do advocate and advance as much market access as we can get
for
 companies providing energy services.

 Bob Fisher (Hills and Company) and I plan to be in Brussels for the
 European Services Federation conference on Monday, November 27th and
I have
 been invited to partipate on a panel which I have accepted.  Bob and
I are
 then planning to travel to Germany, Oslo and London to meet with any
energy
 industry people interested in meeting with us to discuss the energy
 services effort.

 Monday, Nov. 27 Brussels Conference (We hope Brian Raggett can
participate)
 Tuesday, Nov. 28 calls on EC
 Wednesday, Nov. 29 meeting in Dusseldorf/Essen with industry people
 (planning stage)
 Thursday, Nov. 30 meetings in Oslo with industry people (planning
stage)
 Friday, December 1 meetings in London (Can we have lunch with you
and do
 you want us to meet with others)?
 Satuday, December 2 depart for Washington

 Please let us know if Friday will work for you and how you advise we
should
 proceed. We would also like to meet with British Electric Assn and
possibly
 someone in DTI.

 Joe


Sue Thompson
329 High St.
Mystic, CT 06355
iambic@aol.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you
made from selling Enron stock before the company declared
bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and
REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their
retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in
California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron
and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California
consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of
Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company
declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.
And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California
energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of
consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the
largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of
Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to
keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to
help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's
underhanded dealin
Sue Thompson


Clement!

Attached is the Amendment to the Enron Corp. guaranty delivered to Dynegy last week.  The only change we made is to include a reference to the inclusion of master netting agreements in the second paragraph.

If the attached is acceptable, please have signed and call me when it's ready and I'll pickup.

Thanks for your help!

Marie
x33907


It was not meant as an implication, but rather a reiteration of mind-sets
expressed to me on multiple occasions.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tobin Carlson                           03/28/2000 12:32 PM

To: Benjamin Freeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicholas J
Stephan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: The life of an egg....

I think you may, in fact, be onto something there Sir Freeman. :)

To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicholas J
Stephan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: The life of an egg....

That was an insightful commentary on the male condition. I guess you're
implying that all of us guys need a good lay or day. Even Lisa too.


Ricardo,

Thanks for the thought the other day.
Kay has been laid off as of this week.
I am still working until a deal can be done to
sell off the trading arm of the company.
Will know in the next week or two.

Dutch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"siva66" <siva66@mail.ev1.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:12 AM
To:	Frthis@aol.com; Rs1119@aol.com; wolphguy@aol.com; martier@cpchem.com; Quigley, Dutch; siva66@mail.ev1.net; john_riches@msn.com; jramirez@othon.com; klyn@pdq.net; djackson@rpsionline.com; bwdunlavy@yahoo.com; Mark Molnar
Subject:	Re: Fwd: Chris Simms brings balance to the force

i have to say this is pretty funny.  won't happen cause
the 'hornys will be down by 35 by the begining of the second half,
and chance mock will be playing while chrissy will be to busy
seeing if he could transfer to austin peay or tarleton state.

ricardo

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 08:32:47 -0600

>Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 08:28:37 -0600
>From: "Dave Molnar" <DaveM@cajunusa.com>
>To: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
>Subject: Chris Simms brings balance to the force
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>Many people are concerned with the state of Chris Simms
confidence going =
>into next season now that he has been benched for the bowl game.
There is =
>no reason for panic as the scenario shall play out like this.
The =
>Longhorns and Huskies will be tied at 28 late in the fourth
quarter of the =
>Holiday Bowl.  Applewhite will lead the Horns on a miraculous 50-
yd drive =
>down to the Washington 30-yd line with only 10 sec left on the
clock.  =
>Between plays Applewhite will look over at the Golden Boy
standing on the =
>sideline and recognize that the time is now for Simms to fulfill
his =
>Destiny.  As the Star Wars music plays in the background,
Applewhite will =
>lead the Horns up to the line of scrimmage.  In Obi-Wan Kenobi-to-
Darth =
>Vader fashion, Major will look across the line at the Huskies
defense and =
>say,"Strike me down and I shall become more powerful than you
could ever =
>imagine."  As the ball is snapped, Major drops back in the pocket
and then =
>stands motionless, allowing the Huskies linebackers to pummel
him.  Simms =
>screams, "NO!!!" as Major lies motionless on the field.  Major is
carted =
>off the field with numerous broken bones while the Golden Boy
takes his =
>warm-up tosses on the sideline.  The clock sits at 4 seconds
remaining as =
>Simms trots onto the field.  Only enough time for one try at the
endzone.  =
>Simms walks to the line, takes the snap and begins to look over
the field. =
> As Simms prepares to unload a blazing bullet pass right into the
hands of =
>a Washington safety, he hears Major's voice in his mind, "Use the
force =
>Chris, read the field".  The Golden Boy brings his throwing arm
down, the =
>Star Wars music plays once again, and Chris looks over the entire
field =
>for the first time since playing the School for the Blind back in
Jersey.  =
>Simms spots Roy Williams wide open, closes his eyes, and fires a
30 yd =
>touchdown pass for the victory.  And hence the legend of the
Golden Boy is =
>alive and well.=20
>
>Stay tuned for the next episode as Chris learns that his father
is not =
>ex-player/broadcaster Phil Simms, but is actually broadcaster
Dennis =
>Miller
>
>

________________________________________________________________
Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net


Joe, EnronOnline is essentially the internet distribution channel for our gas
and power business.  Rather, my focus on the legacy channel is an attempt to
increase the probability that more originators can complete transactions and
generate deal flow.  As well, to reduce the conflict between the trading and
origination organizations in order to keep us spending more time in the
market than focused on internal issues.  As far as specifics, you will have
to wait and see.

Thanks
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000
08:16 AM ---------------------------

Joseph Short@ENRON
10/04/2000 05:57 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Follow-up to ENA Orientation

I enjoyed your presentation this morning.  You mentioned that one of your
current tasks is "pushing the legacy origination/structuring model to the
next step".  What do you mean by this?  Do you envision using the internet or
other technology to enhance the current origination structure?


Attached is the list compiled by Marathon of "influentials" in each of our
priority legislative districts (this week, we're only focusing on Burton,
Bowen, Hertzberg, Keeley and Cox).  Please review the list and let me know
ASAP if you know anyone on the list and would be willing to make calls.
Thanks. kd

 - List of targeted legislators April 2 2001.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2000 07:21
AM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/21/2000 02:36:13 PM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Molly.Johnson@enron.com" <Molly.Johnson@enron.com>, " - *Dalphon,
Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Scott, David"
<dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Bizik, Kim"
<knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Jones, Donna"
<djones1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Destephanis, Kara"
<kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Boyd, Heidi"
<hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *cfrankl2@enron.com"
<cfrankl2@enron.com>, " - *joan.veselack@enron.com"
<joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com" <vversen@enron.com>, " -
*cindy.vachuska@enron.com" <cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " -
*cora_pendergrass@enron.com" <cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " -
*mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>, " - *scott.goodell@enron.com"
<scott.goodell@enron.com>, " - *steve.gillespie@enron.com"
<steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " - *cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " -
*despey@enron.com" <despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com"
<joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: CES First-of-the-Month Requirements for May '00

The attached file contains the May '00 Baseload citygate and storage
injection/(withdrawal) requirements.   Please note the caveats in the Comments
worksheet.  We will address those promptly on Monday.    CES personnel note
that the attached file is archived on the network in P:\Energy
Ops\Enron\May_00\  so you don't need to save it elsewhere.

Have a nice weekend.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - May00_FOM_Reqs.xls


Thanks to everyone for all the hard work in making this a successful test. Thanks also to everyone involved in continuing to support Estate as well as the Net Co due diligence efforts.

The dedication, talent and professionalism is self evident in all these efforts. The conversion and test this weekend was a great success --- an on-time conversion under tough deadlines and difficult circumstances. The teamwork - between the business folks and the IT applications and operations teams - has been exemplary. I know that a lot of personal sacrifice and overtime was required to make this happen. This effort is appreciated.

We now have one more hurdle -- the conversion and integration test of the NetCo environment by Friday. If we can complete this, it will allow us to take the 3 day weekend without worrying about work.

I know I missed some people on the mailing list. Please pass on the congratulations.

Thanks again for all the great work.

 -----Original Message-----
From: Sanvido, Terry
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 6:29 PM
To: Brackett, Debbie R.; Hare, Bill D.; Hayden, Frank; Jaquet, Tammy; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Moorer, Torrey; Rodriguez, Bernice; Sweitzer, Tara; Theriot, Kim S.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Dupuy, Mark; Gillis, Brian; Heal, Kevin; McKeel, Richard; Reeves, Kathy; Seib, Dianne; Vander velde, Nikole; Anderson, Diane; Baker, Natalie; Baxter, Bryce; Bowen, Bob; Campos, Sylvia A.; Garcia, Clarissa; Hilliard, Marlene; Hunter, Larry Joe; Price, Wade R.; Richardson, Stacey; Schrab, Mark L.; Severson, Russ; Spears, Christopher; Sullivan, Patti; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wynne, Rita; Chitradurga, Sundar; Cinelli, Steve; Elwood, Richard; Franks, Shawn; Greig, Iain; Harmon, Kenneth M.; Hunter, Wade; Johnson, Jeff; Nolte, Ron; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Saleem, Aftab; Sanvido, Terry; Smith, Regan M.; Allen, Thresa A.; Aucoin, Evelyn; Bentley, Corry; Clemons, Amy; Dahlke, Andrea; Denton, Rhonda L.; Evans, Casey; Murphy, Melissa; Robinson, Rhonda; Stevens, Mechelle
Subject: Estate Integration Test - 1/13/2001

When you look back over the past few weeks, you realized that a tremendous amount of work was done and it resulted in only a few minor issues during today' s integration test. Everyone involved should give himself or herself a well-deserved pat on the back.

Thank You!

During the upcoming week, the integration test team will be concentrating on resolving any outstanding issues for Estate and completing the Netco integration tests. For the most part, we will use the same test scripts used for Estate; the major differences are EOL and SAP. The plan is to complete the testing by end of day on Friday, January 18th.

Problem resolution Monday - Wednesday - procedure

Contact the Bridgeline 800-711-8000 (Code #3454709) from 7am - 7pm.  This will be the most effective of tracking, dispatching to the application representatives.  The integration test team will be monitoring and have access to the escalation procedures.

For those individuals who work in Unify, please remember to logoff and log back into Windows prior to accessing Unify. Please pass this information on to your co-workers.

Just a reminder, for those individuals who participated in the testing, please clean up (zero out, un-officialize, etc.), do not kill the deal, any deals created during the testing for Sitara, TAGG, EnPower, Unify PM, Unify VM, Unify Settlements, CAS and ?????:

Thank You,

Integration Test Team


If you think this is worth pursuing, get in touch with Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 07/25/2000 02:08
PM ---------------------------
From: Christi L Nicolay@ECT on 07/25/2000 01:46 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Idea

AEP, ComEd, Duke and CP&L announced last week that they would be
collaborating on a new version of a net based system better than OASIS.  I
think that Enron should consider joining with these utilities on this.  There
may be substantial Enron upside to such a venture from added information
disclosure and standardization and streamlining for easier use:

On 7/14, FERC issued an Advance NOPR asking for input by 2/15/01 on OASIS
Phase II (the new OASIS proposal).  In particular, FERC states that this new
OASIS should address: (i) communication of critical market information (like
transmission rights); (ii) posting of ATC, TTC, and CBM; and (ii) seams
issues between RTOs (transmission service across multiple RTOs).  FERC says
that the new OASIS should make use of Internet, interactive displays, etc.
FERC also asks for information on dynamic notification (where the OASIS
automatically alerts the customer to changes in ATC, reservations, etc.)
This type of functionality would allow Enron to determine if it wants to stay
in a queue when transmission becomes available (rather than getting kicked
out after the first denial for lack of ATC.)  FERC also wants information on
whether generator-run status should be included on OASIS; electronic
scheduling (which can now be done via etag); and business practices that
should be standardized.
Enron could have significant input to force these utilities to propose a
good, customer friendly system that provides valid and helpful data on ATC,
TTC, and CBM, rather than the total lack of substantive information that is
available today.  (Recall that Enron proposed that CBM use be posted--FERC
has not adopted that idea yet.)
Because these are critical utilities, any system that they propose may be
very likely to be adopted (with some changes).  I think it is better to be in
on the front end.  Enron's participation would also give validity to their
system.
Dan Larcamp told me that he would like more "classes" for his staff from
Enron and that we should give joint classes with AEP because Susan Tomasky
told Dan L. that "AEP has nothing to hide."  This type of venture would allow
AEP one venue to make good on that statement.
Steve K. asked us to pursue the idea that Enron build a computer system.
This may be a good way to have significant input while leveraging these
companies' money and promoting Enron's congestion model ideas, etc.


Christine Homsey
3166 Dean Court
Minneapolis, MN 55416
chrishomsey@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Christine Homsey


Jim's a wuss!
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 08:34
AM ---------------------------
From: Jim Homco on 11/29/2000 08:04 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Teal Lodge

Per my wife - if someone shoots an animal (or bird or duck), she should have
the right to shoot that person.

Chris Germany
11/29/2000 07:47 AM
To: Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Teal Lodge

According to Mr. Goodell, Tetco has Teal Lodge on the seller's block.  I
think you should buy it.


George,

The following volumes are included in the May, 2001 spreadsheet but deals do not exist in Sitara.  Daren has requested that we be advised by noon today of the information on pricing ( i.e., Gas Daily or IFHSC).  Thanks.

Counterparty		Meter		Zone		Nomination

Carrizo Oil & Gas	9888		12		10,000
Comstock Oil & Gas	9878		20		100
D & P Operating	?		001(Gulf Coast)	5,000
Ergon Exploration	9880		08		9,000
HESCO Gathering	9649		?		300
HESCO Gathering	9876		05		85
HESCO Gathering	9885		05		1,100
Louis Dreyfus		9874		14		750
Suemaur Exploration	9881		02		1,300
United Oil & Mineral	9887		19		2,000


In September, you used the services of the ETS Solution Center, and we invite you to share your thoughts and suggestions on your experience with us.  If you would like to share your thoughts but remain anonymous, you can access the information below by going to www.ets.enron.com, selecting the Solution Center page, and clicking on 'Click Here' by the Questions & Comments title.  Otherwise, please take a moment to complete all or any part of the questionnaire below:

General Comments

Suggestions

Was the Help Desk staff courteous and helpful?
Poor	___1  ___2  ___3  ___4  ___5   Excellent

Please rate the Help Desk technician's technical expertise.
Poor	___1  ___2  ___3  ___4  ___5   Excellent

If your issue was escalated to our Level 2 (Desktop) group, was their response timely?
Poor	___1  ___2  ___3  ___4  ___5   Excellent

Please rate the Desktop technician's technical expertise.
Poor	___1  ___2  ___3  ___4  ___5   Excellent

Please rate your overall experience with our services.
Poor	___1  ___2  ___3  ___4  ___5   Excellent

Thank you in advance for helping us improve!

Chris A. Smith
Manager, ETS Solution Center-Houston
713-853-3270


Please share the following announcement with your associates.
*************************************************************************

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM ON
QUANTITATIVE AND COMPUTATIONAL FINANCE

Friday, April 7th, 2000
Auditorium of MARC Bldg. on the Georgia Tech Campus

Sponsored by
the DuPree College of Management,
the College of Engineering  School of Industrial and Systems Engineering,
and the College of Sciences  School of Mathematics.

PROGRAM:

12:30 - 12:40   Welcome
                        Michael Thomas, Provost of Georgia Tech

12:40 - 12:45   Introduction of the First Speaker

12:45 - 1:30    Walter J. Muller III, Bank of America
                        "Interest Rate Models for Pricing Fixed Income
                        Securities"

1:30 - 1:40     Q&A and Introduction of the Second Speaker

1:40 - 2:25     Steven L. Allen, Chase Manhattan Bank
                        "Management of Market Risk -- What Can We Learn
                        from the Experiences of 1997 and 1998?"

2:25 - 2:45     Break

2:45 - 2:50     Introduction of the Third Speaker

2:50 - 3:35     Billy Thornton, Invesco Capital Management
                        "Optimal Portfolio Construction and Risk Control"

3:35 - 3:45     Q&A and Introduction of the Fourth Speaker

3:45 - 4:30     Ron Dembo, Algorithmics, Inc.
                        "Measuring the Risk of a Large Financial Institution"

4:30 - 4:40     Q&A and Introduction of the Fifth Speaker

4:40 - 5:25     Alexander Eydeland, Southern Company Energy Marketing L.P.
                        "Energy Derivatives"

5:25 - 5:40     Closing/Extra Time
5:45 - 6:30     Reception

Short Biographies of the Speakers are given below.

*********************************************
REGISTRATION:

There is no charge for attendance at the Symposium.
However, space is limited, so we do encourage you to
let us know that you will be attending. Please send the
following information before Wednesday, April 5, 2000.

Conference: "QCF"
First Name:
Last Name:
Company/Institution:
Department:
Address:
City:
State/Province:
Zip/Postal Code:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:

to

Robert Kertz
E-mail:  kertz@math.gatech.edu
Fax:     404-894-4409

**************************************
LODGING:

You can make your own hotel arrangements with one of the many hotels in
town.  Some hotels close by Tech's campus are:

        Holiday Inn Express (404-881-0881),
        Days Inn, 683 Peachtree Street (404-874-9200),
        Renaissance Hotel, W. Peachtree Street (404-881-6000),
        Marriott Courtyard, 1132 Techwood Drive (404-607-1112), and
        Regency Suites, 975 West Peachtree Street (404-876-5003).

In all cases, ask about the Georgia Tech rate.

*************************************
LOCATION:

The conference will be held in the first floor auditorium of the
Manufacturing Research Center (MARC Bldg.), 813 Ferst Drive,
on the Georgia Tech Campus in Atlanta, Georgia.

MAP:

A map of campus can be found on the web at http://gtalumni.org.  The
conference is in the Manufacturing Research Center (#126 on the map),
which is the rectangular building directly north of the Groseclose
building (#56 on the map) and the Instructional Center (#55 on the map).

DIRECTIONS:

(Additonal directions can be found at the website
http://www.marc.gatech.edu/directions.html
associated with the MARC Building)

By MARTA: Take the North-South Marta train ($1.50) to the North Avenue
exit.  The station is on the northeast corner of West Peachtree and North
Avenue.  Walk west along North Avenue past the Varsity and over the
expressway.  After the football stadium, take the steps up and enter the
campus.  Walk diagonally across the campus and ask some students where to
find the Manufacturing Research Center.

By car, if you are entering Atlanta from I-20 or while traveling north on
I-75 or I-85:
I-75 and I-85 merge in Atlanta to form I-75/85.  (If you are on I-20, go
north on I-75/85 in the center of Atlanta.)  Exit the expressway at Exit
100 which is the Spring Street and West Peachtree Street exit.  Turn left
at the second light onto West Peachtree Street.  Turn left at the first
light onto North Avenue.  Travel west on North Avenue and follow the signs
to the "Center for the Arts".  These signs will ask you to turn right onto
Tech Parkway which is the second traffic light along the GT campus, then
turn right at the first light, and then you are forced to turn either
right or left onto Ferst Drive.  Now go to the parking directions section
below.

By car, if you are entering Atlanta while traveling south on I-75 or
I-85:
I-75 and I-85 merge in Atlanta to form I-75/85.  Exit the expressway at
Exit 100 which is the North Avenue exit.  Turn right at the top of the
ramp onto North Avenue.  Travel west on North Avenue and follow the signs to
the "Center for the Arts."  These signs will ask you to turn right onto Tech
Parkway which is the second traffic light along the GT campus, then turn
right at the first light, and then you are forced to turn either right or
left onto Ferst Drive.  Now go to the parking directions section below.

PARKING DIRECTIONS:

Turn right onto Ferst Street, then turn left into the student center
driveway which is the second driveway on your left.  There is a fee of $4.
Walk north past the Instructional Center to the Manufacturing Research
Center.

*****************************************************************************

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT

Professor Robert Kertz
by email at     kertz@math.gatech,edu,
by fax at               404-894-4409,
by phone at     404-894-4311 or
by regular mail at
Professor Robert Kertz
School of Mathematics
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA 30332-0160.

*******************************

BIOGRAPHIES OF SPEAKERS

Steven L. Allen
Managing Director, Market Risk Management for Derivatives
Chase Manhattan Bank, New York

Steve Allen is a Managing Director in the Market Risk Management group of
The Chase Manhattan Bank, heading the Derivatives Product team.  He began
his Career in 1967 with Chase, where his assignments included Deputy Director
of Management Science and Manager of Modeling and Systems for the Asset-
Liability Committee. From 1981 through 1991, he was Director of Research for
Chase's trading activities, in charge of the development of models and
analytics.  His risk management career began in 1991 with the North American
Division of Union Bank of Switzerland, where he was Market Risk Manager for
Fixed Income Products.  He took his current position in 1995 with Chemical
Bank, rejoining Chase by benefit of merger.
Steve studied mathematics as an undergraduate at Columbia College and as a
graduate student at New York University's Courant Institute.  He currently
teaches Risk Management in the Masters Program in Mathematics in Finance at
Courant.  He is co-author of "Valuing Fixed Income Investments and Derivative
Securities".
*******************************
Ron S. Dembo
President and Chief Executive Officer
Algorithmics, Inc.
Toronto

Ron Dembo is President and Chief Executive Officer of Algorithmics, Inc.,
a leading provider of innovative enterprise-wide financial risk management
software, which he founded in 1989. Before founding Algorithmics,
he created and managed a group at Goldman Sachs responsible for
fixed income optimization modeling. Prior to that, he held several
positions in academia. From 1976 to 1986, he served as an Assistant and
Associate Professor of Operations Research in Computer Science at
Yale University, and as a visiting Professor for Operations Research at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Dr. Dembo obtained a Ph.D. in Operations Research from the University of
Waterloo, Ontario (1975). He has written and published over 50 technical
papers on finance and mathematical optimization and holds two patents
for portfolio replication. His latest book on risk, "Seeing Tomorrow:
Weighing Financial Risk in Everyday Life, which he co-authored with
Andrew Freeman, was published in May 1998 by Wiley in the U.S. In October
of 1998, Dr. Dembo was honored with Ernst & Young's Ontario Entrepreneur
of the Year Award for Financial Services for the efforts in developing
Algorithmics into one of the world's premier risk management companies.
He also received a special citation at the National Entrepreneur of the
Year Award for Knowledge Commercialization.
*******************************
Alexander Eydeland
Vice President, Head of Research
Southern Company Energy Marketing L.P.
Atlanta

Alexander Eydeland is Vice President and Head of Research at
Southern Company Energy Marketing. He is responsible for the development of
analytical tools used in pricing, hedging and structuring energy derivative
products and in managing energy assets.  Prior to this he was an Associate
Professor of mathematics at University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and then
occupied various positions at research, trading and structuring departments
at First Boston Corp., Lehman Brothers Inc., and Fuji Capital Markets Corp.
He also holds a Ph.D. in Mathematics from Courant Institute of Mathematical
Sciences.

*******************************
Walter J. Muller III
Senior Vice President
Quantitative Finance
Bank of America
Atlanta

Walter Muller is head of the Quantitative Finance Department at Bank of
America.  He has a Ph.D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in
Mathematical Economics and has over 15 years experience in the marketplace.
His group, Quantitative Finance, has responsibilities in Corporate Treasury,
Risk Management, and Mortgage Servicing.  These activities require model
development for valuation, hedging, and risk aggregation; model review; and
price verification.

*******************************
Billy Thornton
Director of Quantitative Research
INVESCO Capital Management
1360 Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA  30309

Billy Thornton is a partner at INVESCO and director in the
quantitative research group.
Billy began his career in 1979 as a management consultant at
Andersen Consulting, before joining BellSouth as a regulatory
economic analyst in 1981. Billy next moved into academia as a
finance professor teaching corporate finance for the undergraduate,
graduate and executive programs at Goizueta School of Business,
Emory University.  While a professor at Emory, he spent a year as
a visiting scholar at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta researching
special projects. Continuing to teach corporate finance, Billy joined
Clark Atlanta University in 1995. During this time, he also worked as
a consultant with Watson Wyatt Worldwide performing asset allocation
consulting, and executive education and training.
Billy joined INVESCO in 1998 to head INVESCO's department of quantitative
research. His team of analysts performs statistical modeling, researches
investment strategies, and sets risk management controls.
Billy earned a B.S. in mathematics from Clark Atlanta University in 1977
and an M.S. in statistics from Carnegie-Mellon University in 1979. He
graduated from Harvard University, earning a Ph.D in financial economics
in 1989 jointly from the Harvard Business School and Harvard Department
of Economics, and also receiving his M.S. in business economics in 1987.
Billy was a member of both Leadership Atlanta, class of 1994, and
Leadership Georgia, class of 1996.
*********************************************************************


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sample, Molly
Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Re: San Antonio GC Meeting

Jim-I have to be in Denver on Tuesday and Wednesday to finish up a transaction for our West Coast office.  I hope to finish on Wednesday so I can come to San Antonio on Thursday for the rest of the conference.  I am sorry to miss this meeting, but will look forward to an update on the topics discussed.  Thanks.

Molly Sample
VP & General Counsel
EOTT Energy Corp.
713-993-5027
fax 713-402-2806

	James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate 04/26/01 05:36 PM 	   To: John Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, AL ALEXANDERSON/ENRON@enronxgate, Charles Cheek/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Drew Fossum/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Labanowski/ENRON@enronXgate, Jordan Mintz/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rex Rogers/ENRON@enronXgate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Robert H. Walls Jr. (Home Fax)@Robert H. Walls Jr.@+1 (713) 467-0212@FAX@enronXgate  cc:   Subject: San Antonio GC Meeting

Please see the proposed agenda for our meeting in San Antonio next Wednesday.  I look forward to seeing you there.  All the best.  Jim


FYI - we will be negotiating this master.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000 08:54 AM -----

	Christian Yoder
	11/02/2000 07:40 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EWEB

---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
05:30 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pat Boylston" <pgboylston@stoel.com>
10/25/2000 01:29 PM

To: cyoder@enron.com
cc:
Subject: EWEB

Christian, these guys have their act pretty well together.  I spoke with Burt
Dunn (his boss was also listening over Burt's shoulder and helping to confirm
information).

Recently their Board approved a "general plan" of the transaction
contemplated.   They did not do formal Board action in the form of a specific
resolution, but I think the general approval will likely prove to be
sufficient.

Here is what they are sending me:

1.  a copy of the "general plan" so that we can confirm just what the Board
saw and what, if anything, might be seriously missing.

2.  a letter confirming the Board vote approving the "general plan."

3.  a copy of the resolution adopted by the Board several years ago exempting
power purchase contracts from public bidding requirements.

4.  material from their Risk Management manual detailing the approval and
individual authority to enter into provisions with regard to specific types
of power contracts.

I asked Burt to fax these.  It may take a little while to pull it all
together, but I expect to see it no later than early tomorrow morning.

Let me know if there is anything else on EWEB.

I just left a voicemail for Tom Grim re: Clatskanie.  I will continue to
follow-up call him until I get a specific answer to your questions.  I
acknowledge your 3 this afternoon deadline.

More when its available


---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/20/2001 04:03 PM
---------------------------

Anna Symes <annas@cobs.edu> on 02/20/2001 10:10:28 AM
To: "'Kate.Symes@enron.com'" <Kate.Symes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE:

What up dude!

I haven't heard from you in awhile, so I thought I would remind you that you
have a sister and she lives in Colorado and she has no friends and no life
and one psycho roommate and is therefore desperately in need of sane
conversation/gossip through which she can live vicariously.  How's it going?
Are you feeling better?  Is the roommate situation improving?  Mine is SO
not.  And to add to the drama, lonesomeness has once again driven me into
the arms of a man with whom I undoubtedly have no future.  He launched a
surprise attack on Valentine's Day - when my guard was obviously down.  Yes,
it's still the colorblind starbucks guy.  We were just going to go out for A
drink, but 9 vanilla stoli and cokes later we were making out like teenagers
in a prom limo.  Even his baby poop green blazer-style leather jacket had
started to look like an acceptable outerwear addition to his camel-colored
wide-whale corduroy and pumpkin orange sweater ensemble.  It was madness.
So anyway, I shacked, and unfortunately now a precedent has been set, so now
I pretty much spend most of my day coming up with various believable reasons
for not spending the night at his house.    It's been almost a week so I
think he's starting to suspect something.  Little does he know that by the
time this whole debacle is over, he will wish he had never heard the name
"Anna Symes".  He's great and fun and everything, and yet I feel that
familiar desire to kill this relationship - and not just kill it, but shoot
at it and kick it in the head even after it's dead.  Think I have issues?

Other than that, not a lot happening over here.  I like my new job, although
right now it's really dead and I find myself wondering what I'm supposed to
be doing a lot of the time.  I have been playing phone tag with Monica, but
I think I might start stalking her a little more intensely as I am in
desperate need of some friends.  Actually, starbucks guy and I had an
interesting conversation about this last night.  I have been feeling so down
lately, and I finally realized that this move was a million times harder
than London or Argentina were because I am literally starting from scratch
in the social department.  Michelle is scary and therefore does not count as
a source of moral support or even pleasant conversation.  I'm trying to see
this as a positive thing, like a challenge to see if I can be happy without
the network of people I have always had around me.  I know it's not the
Peace Corps or anything, but it's still kind of scary.  Anyway, that's my
deep thought for the week.  I'm sure soon enough I'll be crying yet once
again about how I want to come home, but for now I'm great (I think!).

By the way, have you heard Ben Lee (singer)?  He Claire Danes' boyfriend, so
you may have heard of him before.  Anyway, you have to check him out - he's
awesome!  The cd I like the best has the word hurricanes or volcanoes or
something in the title (sorry, I can't remember exactly).  It's a good
feel-good cd.  So let me know how it's going out there in P-town, and when
are you coming to visit?  Okay, love you, miss you, etc.!

Besos,
Anna

-----Original Message-----
From: Kate.Symes@enron.com [mailto:Kate.Symes@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 1:42 PM
To: annas@cobs.edu
Subject: Re:

Hey there - I'm so sorry I haven't responded until now. I've been swamped
with work, moving, and now the flu. Whoo, hoo! So, as far as gossip is
concerned, I'm all dried up for now. I was going to go on a company ski
trip this weekend, but I feel so crappy I can't even imagine being outside,
let alone surrounded by snow and wind at the same time. I imagine you're
totally used to that by now, but keep in mind your weather is accompanied
by sun and not eternal grayness.

Our house is coming along nicely. Molly and I already want to boot Amber
out, but that's okay. We deal with it by laughing about her antics whenever
possible - behind her back or in front of her face. It really helps us out,
and I think it does wonders for her ego too. Work is work. The weather is
foul! Men are too. I don't even have one prospect at this point. Of course
there's always the innocent, fleeting crushes from a distance; but I've got
to admit I hardly even have the energy for those anymore.

I hope you can make it home for a visit soon, because you are going to LOVE
our house. I will definitely keep my eyes peeled for cheap tickets to
Denver, or maybe I'll just do the train and take a long weekend. Either
way, I'll definitely make it there by springtime. Tell me about your jobs,
friends (or not?), and life in general. I'm going to get back to work and
hustle so I can get out of here early and suffer peacefully at home. I'll
give you a call from my sick bed, 'kay?

Take care,
Kate


Just in case the first number I sent out doesn't work....

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rosado, Jennifer
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 3:56 PM
To:	Mcquade, Jennifer
Subject:	RE: Conf Room

It looks like 713-584 are the new prefix's, but they are as follows:

713-584-1091
713-584-1093
713-584-1050
713-584-1092

I've not been in that room, so I would guess that the first number would be sufficient.


this one looks nice - although slightly expensive.  maybe we can go see it

L,
e

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/11/2001 06:17:16 PM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Welcome to www.har.com! (4)

?
?http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?MLNUM=516080
 - Welcome to www.har.com! (4).url


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
10:44 AM ---------------------------

From:  Matt Motsinger
    02/01/2001 07:15 PM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, David Gallagher/LON/ECT@ECT,
Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim Fallon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, David
J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, S Craig
Story/HOU/ECT@ECT, W Wade Hicks/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Don
Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homer Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Ami Thakkar/NA/Enron@ENRON, Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Bruce Garner/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Product Control - Houston, Product Control - London, Peter
Berzins/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: EOL Average Deal Count as of 1-31-01

Notes for this Week's Report:

*  Enron Metals trades done via EOL has risen by approximately 56% since
December, from a daily average of 357 to a daily average of 611 for January.
This trend continues to demonstrate the sharp growth in the popularity of EOL
as a metals trading platform.

* UK Gas trades on EOL has also increased by approximately 58% since
December, from a daily average of 51 to a daily average of 80 for January.

* US Power trading via EOL has continued to come back further and increased
its average daily EOL Deal Count by about 87% since December, from 181 to 340
deals per day.  In addition, the average daily Non-EOL Deal Count has now
increased by about 11% since December, from 373 to 433 deals per day.  The
average daily EOL volumes have remained steady.

* East Power EOL trades have rebounded from last months daily average of 127
to a new daily average high of 258.

* East Gas has decreased its average daily EOL Deal Count by about 20% since
December, from 777 to 632 deals per day.

* Canadian Gas has seen a 72% increase in EOL daily average of 113 to a daily
average of 195.

---------------
The following files contain a graphical view of the average deal count and
volumes per month by Commodity for EOL and OTC transactions since the launch
of EnronOnline. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not
update links when opening these files.

AVERAGE DEAL COUNTS FOR COMMODITIES (excluding Global Products, which
displays monthly totals)

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please contact one of the
following:

Torrey Moorer x3-6218
Matt Motsinger x3-5221
Pete Berzins x5-7597

Matt
EnronOnline


Looks good.  I'm checking to see who will sign. Have you received the
delivery yet?


Please find attached our Weekly Report (9th November 2000) for your
information and perusal.

Regards,

Beverley


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
05:27 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 02/16/2001 04:21:08 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp021901.pdf


Mark -

FYI.

Bruce

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/28/2001 02:44 PM ---------------------------

Roberto Figueroa
05/25/2001 03:55 PM
To: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Mid-Year Performance Management-Feedback Francisco Pinto Leite

Mr. Lundstrom:

Francisco Pinto-Leite requested my feedback for the Mid-Year Performance
Management Process.  I am stationed in Guatemala City, Guatemala and we do
not have access to the PEP system on line.  Therefore, attached I am sending
the requested feedback.  I am sorry for any inconvenience that this process
may cause.

Thanks,

Roberto Figueroa


Your lucky those cans didn't explode and get all over your clothes huh?
Thanks again, it actually tastes pretty good, but you know my criteria for
beer - cold.

I was just giving you a hard time about the name, that is reason #4761 why it
is good to be a man.  Ashley did the same thing with the middle name, that
way you keep some of your family.

We finally got some cold weather here.  I know you guys just got back from a
vacation, but were wondering if you might like to join us for a skiing trip
to Deer Valley.  We are going Jan 6 - 13th.  The accomodations are paid for,
you would just have lift tickets and airfare.  We are staying in a ski in and
ski out condo, so we are going to do some grocery shopping and cook.  Jason
Tidwell and his girlfriend are coming in on the 6th and leaving on the 9th,
so if you want to come in half time, that is cool too.  Just let us know.
Talk to you soon.
PL


-----Original Message-----
From: Day, Brian (Denver) [mailto:BrianDay@aec.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: FW: For you athletic types!!!!

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Krape, Jack (Denver)
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:40 AM
> To:	Totzke, Christian (Denver); Day, Brian (Denver)
> Subject:	FW: For you athletic types!!!!
>
> Check this out!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Paul Skach [mailto:paul.skach@lewan.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:51 PM
> To:	Andy Richter (E-mail); Bill Artzer (E-mail); Brad Sandler (E-mail);
> Brenda Berger (E-mail) (E-mail); Chad Caldwell (E-mail 3); CJ Johnson
> (E-mail); Colleen Kelly (E-mail); Debbie Chiolero (E-mail); Don Giffels
> (E-mail); Ilene Schreider (E-mail); Ingrid (E-mail); Jacquie Sewell
> (E-mail); JD Concepcion (E-mail); Jessie Calkins (E-mail); Jon Nies
> (E-mail); Julie Dillon (E-mail); Julie. E. Moran (E-mail); Kari Beethe
> (E-mail); Larry Smart (E-mail); Laurel Miller (E-mail); Laurie DeLong
> (E-mail); Leslie McHugh (E-mail); Lisken Brady (E-mail); Mike Vickerman
> (E-mail); Mindy Faville (E-mail); PERKSHKY (E-mail); Randy Hoffman; Randy
> Skach (E-mail); Reagan Soule (E-mail); Rob Habegger (E-mail); Ron Zielin
> (E-mail); Sean Atwood (E-mail); Shannon Van Dyke (E-mail); Shawn Brady
> (E-mail); Shawn Sullivan* (E-mail); Shelle Wilcox (E-mail); SKrumsiek
> (E-mail); Sue Nesbit (E-mail); Todd Haucke (E-mail); Tony Liska (E-mail);
> Tonya Wingert (E-mail)
> Subject:	FW: For you athletic types!!!!
>
>  <<sportingtips.pps>>


request_number:  PG-BPA: 132
firstname:  Sarah
lastname:  Westenberg
e-mail:  sawestenberg@bpa.gov
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  BPA-77
page_numbers:  9
request_text:  Please provide a short description of each line in the two
tables (lines 4-24) including (a) a comparison of the differences between the
two tables (either the reasons for any differences in amounts for a line
description that is the same in both tables, or the reason for any
differences in the logic of the calculations), and (b) a &crosswalk8 showing
how each line in each table corresponds to a variable or equation (or both)
in section f of the GRSPs beginning on p. 15 of Attachment A to this
testimony.

response_text:
The following two tables are excerpted out of WP-02-E-BPA-77, page 9, lines
4-26.

Table Illustrating JCG Method

Table Illustrating BPA Method

Before beginning the comparison of the two tables, it should be pointed out
that the tables calculate gross augmentation costs.  We left out the step
that calculates the net augmentation costs.  As a result, the &Total8 line
dollar amounts ($6M and $6.2M in the JCG table, and $6M and $6M in the BPA
table) should all be reduced by the amount of augmentation resale revenue.
However, since this modification will not affect the comparison requested in
the data request, let us continue as if the &Total8 line dollar amounts are
already net of the augmentation revenue. See the attachment to the data
response.

Another item that may be confusing is the item labeled &Pre-purchase ) 0 day
rule8.  This is the incremental cost associated with purchases made between
the 120-day cut-off and the 0-day cut-off.

Also, a crosswalk of each table showing how it corresponds to a variable or
equation in section f is not possible since section f reflects the BPA
method, not the JCG method.  Perhaps an overview of BPA,s perspective on the
difference between the JCG method and the BPA method will be helpful.

JCG calculated the augmentation costs using two different cost pools, one
cost pool for the Slice product (using the 120 day rule), and a second cost
pool for all other products (using the 0 day rule).  The products then
collected a portion of the augmentation costs associated with a specific
rule.  When these two cost pools yield different net augmentation costs
(which they usually will unless all of the augmentation is purchased under
the 120-day rule), the JCG method doesn,t collect the actual amount of either
of those pools from Slice or non-Slice.  Rather it collects a proportion of
each of the cost pools.

In contrast to the JCG method, the BPA method distributes the costs using the
120-day rule proportionally between the Slice and non-Slice products, and
then assesses all the incremental cost from using the 0-day rule rather than
the 120-day rule to the non-Slice products.  In contrast to JCG method, this
assures that all the actual incremental net augmentation costs calculated by
replacing the &120-day8 rule with the &0-day8 rule are recovered  from
purchasers of non-Slice power products.  In addition, this also assures that
purchasers of the Slice product do not bear any nearer term market prices
fluctuations.

Now for a short description of each line in the two tables, and a comparison
of the differences.  The example assumes that we don,t actually purchase all
of our augmentation, that some of it is served from BPA,s secondary, or is
bought in the spot market.

&Pre-purchase ) 120 day rule8 is the total cost of augmentation purchases
made at least 120 days prior to the month of delivery.  This amount is $2M in
both tables in both columns.  This amount represents the sum of DIURNALACA
for the six-month period.  This would have represented DIURNALACA(S) in the
GRSPs proposed by the JCG in their Direct Case.

&Pre-purchase ) 0 day rule8 is the additional cost of pre-purchases made less
than 120 days prior to the month of delivery.  This amount is $1M in both
tables in the non-Slice column.  The 0-day rule pre-purchases are not
applicable to the Slice product, thus the N/A in the Slice column in both
tables.  If &Pre-purchase ) 120 day rule8 and &Pre-purchase ) 0 day rule8
were summed the sum would represent DIURNALACA(NS) in the GRSPs proposed by
the customers.  Note that the Pre-purchase ) 0 day rule appears in a
different row in the BPA table since BPA has proposed that these incremental
cost enter the calculations at a different point.

Short position is the cost of the amount of AAMTA that is not pre-purchased.
This is the amount that is valued at PRICE in the GRSPs.  In the JCG, the
short position is different between the Slice and non-Slice columns.  This is
because the example has BPA purchasing some additional augmentation ($1M
worth) under the 0-day rule, and there is a corresponding reduction in the
value of BPA,s short position.  The change also reflects that the short
position is valued using different PRICEs for the 120 day rule and the 0 day
rule.  In the BPA example, Short position is $3M for both Slice and non-Slice
products, and the difference (-$0.8M) is found in the row &Short position 0
day rule8

&Buydown8 is the cost of all buydowns.  It is the same in both tables, for
both Slice and non-Slice products.  In the examples BPA spent $1M buying down
load.

&Total8 is the gross cost of augmentation.  As stated above, it should be
reduced by the augmentation resale revenue.  To continue on, let us assume
that &Total8 has been reduced by augmentation resale revenue, and represents
the net augmentation costs.  In the JCG  example, &Total8 is $6M for Slice
and $6.2M for non-Slice.  These would represent NACA(S) and NACA(NS) in the
GRSPs proposed by the JCG in their Direct Case..  In the BPA example, Total
is $6M for both Slice and non-Slice.  This represents NACA in the BPA GRSPs.

&Percent of CRACable revenue8 is the same in both tables.  The example shows
that the Slice revenue is 30% of the total CRACable revenue, and the
non-Slice revenue is 70% of the total CRACable revenue.

&LB CRAC Costs8 only appears in the BPA example.  It is the NACA distributed
between Slice and non-Slice products in proportion to actual revenue.

&Pre-purchase 0 day rule8 and &Short position 0 day rule8 are the changes in
the valuation of pre-purchases ($1M) and Short position (-$0.8M) between the
120 day rule and the 0 day rule.  The net difference of $0.2M is equivalent
to the difference that is seen in &Total8 in the JCG example (the difference
between $6M and $6.2M).  This difference is also equivalent to NACDIFF in the
BPA GRSPs.

&Total LB CRAC Cost(s)8 is the cost that the Slice and non-Slice groups true
up to.  In the JCG example, the Slice product trues up to 30% of $6M, or
$1.8M while the non-Slice products true up to 70% of $6.2M for a total from
both groups of $6.14M.  In BPA,s example, the Slice product pays 30% of $6M
or $1.8M (the same as in the JCG example) while the non-Slice products pay
70% of $6M plus the net difference between valuation of net augmentation
costs using the 120 day rule and valuation using the 0 day rule.  The
non-Slice amount is $4.2M plus $0.2M or $4.4M.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  53.180.74.220
3.  Remote IP Address:  53.180.74.220
4.  Form URL:
http://www.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT; BPA 4.01
SP2; BPA 5.01 SP1)


To All,

To avoid any damage to the walls at Haas, the Facilities Department
requires you to use blue tape when hanging advertisements, signs or posters
for classes or group functions.  Please see Pam Weston in room S549 for
blue tape.

Thank you,

Jennifer Jensen
Facilities  Supervisor
Haas School of Business
S545 Student Services Bldg.
University of California
Berkeley, CA  94720-1900

Tel:  (510) 642-9106
Fax:  (510) 642-4700


This memo will confirm our dinner meeting to be held June 21, 2000 at the
River Oaks Grill

     DATE    June 21, 2000
     PLACE   Wine Room
         River Oaks Grill
         2630 Westheimer
         713/520-1738
     TIME    6:30 PM

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Kay (3x0643) or
Beverly (5x7857)

I will look forward to seeing you there.