Stephen -

This is acceptable.  I will move forward on finalizing the NDA.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	"Fogel, Stephen" <SFogel@cantor.com>
	02/27/2001 12:05 PM

		 To: "'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'" <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com>
		 cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com, Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 Subject: RE: TradeSpark NDA

Mark, thank you. We would request that in Paragraph 3 the "Except as
otherwise provided" languge be deleted and the language below be added in
replacement.

"The parties acknowledge and understand that this agreement does not limit
or restrict the ability of either party to engage in its respective
business, nor does it limit either party's use or application of any
information or knowledge acquired independently of the other without breach
of this agreement in the course of such business.

Is this acceptable?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Fogel, Stephen
Cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: RE: TradeSpark NDA

Stephen -

The below language is acceptable; however, I would suggest it be placed as
the first sentence of Paragraph 3, if it remains TradeSpark's position that
the existing first sentence of this paragraph (beginning with "Except as
otherwise provided ....") is to be deleted.  If the existing first sentence
is to remain, the language you propose should be added as the second
sentence of paragraph 3.

Please confirm the above and I will move forward on finalizing the
agreement.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

                    "Fogel,

                    Stephen"             To:
"'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'"
                    <SFogel@canto        <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com>

                    r.com>               cc:     Michael.Bridges@enron.com,

                                         Tana.Jones@enron.com

                    02/26/2001           Subject:     RE: TradeSpark NDA

                    05:22 PM

I believe I understand your concerns - I would like to suggest that we add
the following language after the first sentence of Paragraph 3 - and then
execute the Agreement.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:55 PM
To: Fogel, Stephen
Cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: TradeSpark NDA

Stephen -

Since we keep missing each other, I wanted to drop you a note about the
comments TradeSpark made to the Enron NDA.

As to the comments:

Paragraph 1 - The changes are acceptable.

Paragraph 3 - The rationale for this deletion needs to be provided.  I
cannot see why this change was made or is necessary.

Paragraph 5 - This deletion is unacceptable to Enron.

When you get a chance, please call me to further discuss Paragraph 3.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Are you coming?  I think I owe you a beer or two, and since it will be on my
expense account, I don't mind paying up!  DF


Darren,
Please review the names below and let me know if there are any other names
that need to be added or subtracted from your group for PRC purposes.  Thanks
for your help, hgm

Sr. Specialist
Ami Chokshi
Stacey Neuweiler


The attached was overlayed in the system today.


Tasha

How are you doing? Did you have a good stampede? I had a great stampede but
got a nasty cold. Work is going good. Do you know Ryan Flemming? He went to
Riverglen and is a pretty good friend of mine. Anyway, he is getting married
August 12 so I've been pretty busy organizing his stag and getting ready for
his wedding. Went to Red Deer this weekend and saw my parents. Did you know
my brother moved to Toronto? I need to find a smaller place but for now I'm
staying in Kensington. That is all that is new in my life. We should hit a
patio and have a drink one night.

Take it easy,

Chris


I generally don't forward this kind of stuff but this seemed interesting -
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/10/2000
02:35 PM ---------------------------

"CAVALIER,DEBORAH MD" <LAB-DSC@womans.com> on 02/10/2000 02:16:41 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ggel@juno.com [SMTP:ggel@juno.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 9:36 AM
> To: gfritchie@dellnet.com; lb5f@virginia.edu; abp5c@virginia.edu;
> lnze307@aol.com
> Subject:
>
> Jake was dying.  His wife, Becky, was maintaining a candlelight vigil by
> his
> side. She held his fragile hand, tears running down her face. Her praying
>
> roused him from his slumber.  He looked up and his pale lips began to
> move
> slightly.  "My darling Becky," he whispered. "Hush, my love," she said.
> "Rest. Shhh. don't talk." He was insistent.  "Becky," he said in his
> tired
> voice.  "I.......I have something I must confess to you."  "There's
> nothing
> to confess," replied the weeping Becky........  "Everything's all right,
> go
> to sleep."  "No.  I must die in peace, Becky.  I.....I slept with your
> Sister, your best friend, her best friend, and your Mother!" "I know..."
>
> Becky whispered softly, "That's why I poisoned you."


yes they do.  thanks

   Kate Symes                05/02/2001 10:36 AM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Trade date on 592751.01 No Bro/Swerzbin

I just realized I never heard back from Mike on this one - is Powerex still
saying the trade date is 4/26?

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   04/30/2001 12:26 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Trade date on 592751.01 No Bro/Swerzbin

Kate, verballed trade with Powerex, they show trade date as 4/26 as opposed
to our 4/25.  Please check with Mike.  Thanks


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000
01:08 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
08/21/2000 12:58 PM
To: Shelly Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter
S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Vikas Dwivedi

Shelly,

I shall not accept anybody for a rotation without a prior interview.

Li was scheduled to meet with me last Thursday but  she never showed
up. She did not call to cancel or to apologize for not showing up.
I have not seen her resume.

Please, assume she is not rotating into my group till further notice.

Vince

	From:  Shelly Butler                           08/18/2000 03:37 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vikas Dwivedi

Jeff,

Just wanted to confirm that Li will be placed in Vince Kaminski's group.
Vikas has been placed in ENA Middle Market reporting to Craig Breslau.
Please contact me at 3-4584 if you have any questions.  Thanks for your help!!

Shelly

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           08/18/2000 03:18 PM

To: Shelly Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject:

Shelly,

Hunter spoke with Li today and agrees that her first rotation should be in
Vince's group doing modelling, etc.  This will give her the broadest
experience for a first rotation.  I'm sure the other person in question,
Vikas, will do very well in Hunter's group.

Thanks for your help.

Jeff


This is to confirm your removal from our database.
You will receive no further emails from F1Trading.com


Mary/ Sara,

Morgan Stanley has proposed a few changes to the confirm that was executed last year. These changes are all in blue and most of these seem to be legal in nature. The number of barrels and the payments dates need to be changed.

I am also sending the Morgan Stanley confirm circulated by you yesterday to Beth Ng at Morgan Stanley and asking her to have a look at its acceptability in order to speed up the process.

Could you also liaise with Beth, so that we arrive at an agreeable confirm by close of business today? Beth's card is enclosed for this purpose.
As an alternative (if we can't come to an agreeable format), could you please take a look at the MS confirms sent by MS and see whether it is acceptable to us?

Thanks very much & Regards

Rajaram Jamadagni
0044-2077832505

-----Original Message-----
From: Glaas, Chris
Sent: 24 September 2001 18:51
To: Kirby, Treasa
Cc: Jamadagni, Rajaram
Subject: FW: Confirmation Format

Treasa
Spoke to Beth from MS NY today. She got our modified confirm and she has some comments on the matter.
regards
chris glaas
-----Original Message-----
From: Beth Ng [mailto:Beth.Ng@morganstanley.com]
Sent: 24 September 2001 18:44
To: Glaas, Chris
Cc: David Morgan; Jaakko Ahmala; Tim Arcedeckne-Butler; Laura Higginson; Jonathan M Pell; Benjamin Johns
Subject: Confirmation Format

Dear Chris:

David Morgan of our London Desk has forwarded for my review your proposed form of Confirmation.

Attached you will find the Confirmation marked with our proposed modifications.   Please be mindful that I have not looked at any of the commercial elements of the proposed Transaction.   I will leave this review for our trading desk.   Our suggested modifications are highlighted in blue.   Our specific comments are as follows:

1.    Second paragraph.  The reference to "Rights of Third Party" was deleted because the transaction will be between U.S. parties and the Agreement is governed under the laws of the State of New York.    Rights of Third Party has no relevance.

2.    Third paragraph.   We have added this paragraph because the Agreement between MSCGI and Enron North America is a non-ISDA.  We have noted that some of the terms in the Confirmation definitions from ISDA.

3.    Fourth paragraph.   I believe you want to insert a "non-reliance" provision in this Confirmation.   I have included some additional elements to "non-reliance".  Alternatively, we can insert the "No Reliance" provision as suggested by ISDA.

I am working with Susan Bailey of your Houston office to update the current master agreement to an ISDA Master Agreement.  Hopefully, in the very near future, we will have an ISDA to govern our relationship.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Kind regards,

Beth Ng
Commodities Division - Documentation
Tel:  212 761 8720
Fax: 212-507-4898 /  212 761 0293
Email:  Beth.Ng@morganstanley.com

1585 Broadway, 4th Floor
New York, NY   10036
U.S.A.


Attached, please find an article from today's Sacramento Bee regarding the SCE MOU, as well as a terrific editorial from Daniel Weintraub regarding direct access.

Californians oppose Edison deal, poll finds

By Amy Chance
Bee Political Editor
(Published Sept. 25, 2001)

Californians by large margins oppose Gov. Gray Davis' proposal to use state-backed bonds to prevent Southern California Edison from slipping into bankruptcy, according to a Field Poll released Monday.

Overall, the new poll found that Californians' concern about the electricity shortage has eased considerably. They give themselves credit for proving power blackout predictions wrong with strong conservation efforts.

But they are in no mood as taxpayers or ratepayers to help bolster the finances of a key investor-owned utility.

The poll noted that Edison "is in danger of declaring bankruptcy" and asked those surveyed whether "to avoid this possibility" they supported a proposal in which Edison would issue $2.9 billion in state-backed bonds to be repaid by its customers over time.

Adults statewide opposed the idea 66 percent to 23 percent; registered voters were against it 68 percent to 21 percent.

Pollster Mark DiCamillo noted that a large majority of Southern California Edison's own customers -- 70 percent -- were opposed to the plan.

One factor, he said, may be the public's view of bankruptcy.

"With PG&E in bankruptcy, nothing has really changed for PG&E customers," he said. "That may have some influence on their attitudes."

The Democratic governor has sought for months to gain legislative support for a plan to prevent Edison from following Pacific Gas and Electric Co. into bankruptcy court, arguing that the state's ability to get out of the power-buying business depends on the effort.

But the Legislature adjourned Sept. 15 without taking final action on a plan. Consumer groups argued vigorously against what they termed a "bailout," and some lawmakers said they didn't see the proposal as a better alternative than bankruptcy.

Davis threatened to call lawmakers back to the Capitol to address the issue within two weeks, angering Senate President Pro Tem John Burton. Both the governor and Burton have since said they intend to negotiate before asking legislators to return.

DiCamillo said the numbers indicate that Davis is pursuing an unpopular path that could affect his own re-election effort.

"If he continues to pursue it -- and all indications are that he's going to -- he's expending more of his own political capital on an issue that is clearly not very popular," DiCamillo said. "He may wish to do that. Some people say that's how you define leadership -- when you take your own personal stances because you think they are in the public interest, (not) what people think at the time.

"But some of the medicine he's prescribing is unpalatable. And some of the Democrats in the Legislature have called him on it and said, 'We're not going to go for this. We're running for re-election, too.' "

A Davis adviser said the findings were "no surprise."

"Utilities aren't popular. That's the reality," said Davis political consultant Garry South.

In May, amid predictions that the state would spend the summer suffering through blackouts, 75 percent of Californians saw the situation as "very serious." That number dropped in the latest poll to 44 percent.

Asked to rate the efforts of various groups and officials to improve California's energy outlook, residential energy consumers put themselves at the top of the list, with 55 percent saying they have done a very good or good job.

Californians also saw industry and business as willing to pitch in, as 40 percent described their efforts as good or very good.

They gave higher "poor" marks, meanwhile, to a long list of others -- Davis, the Legislature, President Bush, the state Public Utilities Commission, the state's private utilities, out-of-state energy providers and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

And about half said they continue to see rate increases that hit earlier this year as "very" or "somewhat" serious, and expect rates in their area to rise even more in the next 12 months.

"If you asked them to rate how they got out of this situation, they'd say we got ourselves out of it by cutting back -- the politicians didn't help much, the regulatory agencies didn't help much," DiCamillo said. "But they're still irritated because rates have gone up, and they expect them to go up further.

Daniel Weintraub: Now it's illegal to purchase your own electricity

(Published Sept. 25, 2001)

Buying your own has been banned in California. Electricity on the open market is now officially contraband. Like prescription drugs, which you can get only from a licensed pharmacy, electricity is something you can buy from your local utility, which can make its own or buy it from the state. Beyond that, it's an illegal substance.

It was the grand hope of a deregulated electricity industry that you and I and the factory down the street would be able to buy our own juice from the lowest bidder. It might have been a pain -- kind of like shopping for telephone service. But just as breaking up Ma Bell spawned great leaps in mobile phone technology, busting the utility monopoly was supposed to usher in a new era for electricity.

Not that there were mobs of shopkeepers and apartment dwellers lobbying the Legislature for consumer choice. It was the biggest users who really wanted to cut their own deals. Under the old, regulated system, the huge factories that make steel and cement and computers, and gobble up electricity by the megawatt, were paying 50 percent more than their competitors in other states. They wanted the right to shop around.

The Legislature agreed, but only to a point. Lawmakers permitted choice, but they rigged the new system in its early years to favor the utilities that were a powerful force in the Capitol. They made it nearly impossible for the private generators to undercut the utilities' pricing, and they put roadblocks in the way of cities that might have gathered their small customers together and used their market clout to negotiate for lower rates.

The government spent millions on an advertising campaign trying to persuade us of the wisdom of buying our own energy. But there weren't really many deals to be had. Now there are none.

Consumer choice died a quiet death last week at the hands of the Public Utility Commission. Its demise was collateral damage from the mess that was California's experiment in electricity deregulation.

Choice couldn't survive because the state, which now controls the energy business, can't cope with the competition. If Californians were allowed to buy their own electricity, pretty soon most of us would figure out that we are getting a rotten deal from the state. As more people left the state system, the few that remained would have to pay higher and higher rates to keep the books balanced. Eventually, the whole thing would collapse of its own weight.

We're in this fix because Gov. Gray Davis, when he stepped in to buy electricity on behalf of the failing utilities in January, went too far. Craving stability at any price, Davis bought almost all the energy the state will need for the next few years and much of what we'll need for a decade. And he bought that electricity at the top of the market, paying prices that had never been so high, and might never be again.

As those prices were passed along to consumers, suddenly choosing your own electricity supplier got more attractive than ever. Thousands of businesses jumped at the opportunity. Among them were the big steel factories in the Inland Empire region east of Los Angeles.

Tamco Steel of Rancho Cucamonga, which makes rebar, realized its annual electricity bill was going to climb from $12 million to $26 million if it stayed with the local utility, Southern California Edison, according to a report in the Riverside Press-Enterprise. The company, which just laid off 70 people, one-fourth of its workers, desperately started searching for cheaper energy. It signed a deal with a private supplier on Sept. 1, just days before the state slammed the door shut on such opportunities.

That's a scenario that was repeated up and down the state all summer, and it illustrates why, in the twisted world of electricity regulation, the Public Utilities Commission had to step in and just say no. Without the ban there would have been a "jailbreak," in the words of one commissioner, leaving small customers or the taxpayers holding the bag.

That decision might have been unavoidable, given the circumstances. But it didn't have to be this way. Davis could have swallowed hard and ridden out the storm earlier this year. He could have signed electricity contracts for shorter terms at higher prices. That would have been painful, financially and politically, but once the crisis passed, Californians would have been free again to set their own course. Instead, we are imprisoned in a high-priced, state-run system, and will be for years to come.

California, in fact, is worse off than it was in 1995, when companies stuck with high utility rates first asked for the freedom to buy their own electricity. This does not seem like an unreasonable request, an act that should be against the law. Yet now it is. The real crime, though, is the state bungling that destroyed the electricity industry.


Hi Shannon,

Could you be sure to remove my name from the distribution and replace it with George Huan...he has taken over my roll running the options book.

Thanks,
Susan

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001 05:07 PM ---------------------------
From:	Shannon McPearson/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 03:24 PM
To:	Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chance Rabon/ENRON@enronXgate, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	0201 PMA's

Here are the PMA's as of February 2001 accounting. Please call if you have any questions. Nothing for you this month, Kori!!

Thanks!

Shannon McPearson
Enron North America
713-853-5944
Shannon.McPearson@enron.com


This is to remind you that various anonymous reporting facilities are
available for you to report violations of Company policy and suspected
criminal conduct by any officer, employee, or agent of Enron relating to the
performance of his or her duties.  These reporting facilities are also
available for your questions, messages, comments, and suggestions.

 Any policy violation or criminal conduct may be reported by letter, e-mail,
or voice mail, as set forth below, describing the suspected violation or
criminal conduct with as much detail as possible to allow Enron to conduct an
investigation of the reported matter.

1. Letters should be sent to the Confidential Post Office Box:

Enron Compliance Officer
Confidential - Conduct of Business Affairs
P. O. Box 1188
Houston, Texas  77251-1188

2. E-mails should be sent to the Office of the Chairman,s e-mail box:
Employees with Enron e-mail can access this box by sending an e-mail to the
Office of the Chairman.  Simply type &Office of the Chairman8 in the address
box, type your message, and send.  Your message will be completely
anonymous.  If, however, you copy your message and e-mail it to someone else,
the copy will not be anonymous.

3. Voice mail messages should be left with the Office of the Chairman voice
mail box.  You can access the Office of the Chairman voice mail box at (713)
853-7294.  If you call from your extension or an outside line, your message
will be completely anonymous.  If, however, you access the voice mail box
while you are in the Enron voice mail system, your message will not be
anonymous.

 You may, but are not required to, identify yourself.  If you would like to
identify yourself, please submit your name and phone number with your letter
or message.  All anonymously reported matters will be investigated and acted
upon in the same manner as those that contain signatures.

 We take great pride in ensuring that Enron is a great place to work.  We
encourage each employee to continue to conduct Enron's business affairs in
accordance with all applicable laws and in a moral and honest manner.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000
12:27 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           06/06/2000 10:26 AM

To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://ecthou-webcl1.nt.ect.enron.com/gas/

All the gas reports are under west desk

Call Brian Hoskins for a password


I will be there on the 25th.  Thanks.  --Sally

10/18/2000 11:15 AM
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
10/18/2000 11:15 AM
10/18/2000 11:15 AM
To: Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Slagle/HOU/ECT@ect, Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Romine/NA/Enron@Enron,
James Whitehead/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Scales/NA/Enron@Enron, Tommy J
Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kristin Cantu/Corp/Enron@Enron, Todd
Ballengee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew Cole/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew
Matthews/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Huff/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John
Coyle/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Snooky
Tiedje/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tapa Shankar Ghosh/NA/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Schneider/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Lim/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nicolas
Lam/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christopher Cocks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Rubin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Flores-Cuellar/NA/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Team-Building 10/25

I apologize but the Team building will now be on Wednesday, October 25th
(same location & same time).  Hope everyone can still join us.

Thanks,
Brenda
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda Flores-Cuellar/NA/Enron on
10/18/2000 10:57 AM ---------------------------

10/18/2000 11:10 AM
Brenda Flores-Cuellar
Brenda Flores-Cuellar
Brenda Flores-Cuellar
10/18/2000 11:10 AM
10/18/2000 11:10 AM
To: Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Slagle/HOU/ECT@ect, Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Romine/NA/Enron@Enron,
James Whitehead/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Scales/NA/Enron@Enron, Tommy J
Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kristin Cantu/Corp/Enron@Enron, Todd
Ballengee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew Cole/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew
Matthews/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Huff/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John
Coyle/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Snooky
Tiedje/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tapa Shankar Ghosh/NA/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Schneider/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Lim/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nicolas
Lam/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christopher Cocks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Rubin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Flores-Cuellar/NA/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Team-Building 10/26

We would like to invite you all to join us at our second CommodityLogic
off-site Team Building.  Our objective is to welcome all the new team members
to our group.  Please join us October 26th at:

Kenneally's
 2111  S. Shepherd Drive
(713) 630-0486

beginning at 5:30pm

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Maria x35586 or Brenda
x31914.


M355943 - NOT IN TAGG
SYSTEM,
                                              M355933, M356868, M357769,
M357771 - NOT TO BE CONFIRMED STATUS


Susan,

Just run the same search under the name of Tiffany Brick Company, L.P.  -  couldn't find any deals for physical gas.

Rgds,
Ellen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:29 PM
To:	Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	RE: US Brick Co.

Ellen,

I have just found out that US Brick may also transact business under the name Tiffany Brick Company, L.P.

So please conduct another search under that name.   And if there are confirms, please furnish the hard copies to me.

Thanks,

Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wallumrod, Ellen
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:05 AM
To:	Bailey, Susan
Subject:	RE: US Brick Co.

Susan,

Is "US Brick Co." the actual name of this counterparty ? I have just searched for any physical gas transactions under this name and got 0 results.

Rgds,
Ellen
x54099

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:36 AM
To:	Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	US Brick Co.

Ellen,

Please check to see if there are any "live" physical deals with the captioned counterparty.  If so, please provide a hard copy of the confirmation(s) evidencing such deals.

I wuld appreciate receipt of such confirmations by Wednesday, February 6th.

Many thanks for all your help.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Check out "bid4vacations.com".

It was written about in the Chronicle this morning - it has some great deals!


Got debt? We can help using Debt Consolidation!

If you owe $4,000 USD or more, consolidate your debt into
just 1 payment and let us handle the rest! Wouldn't it be
nice to have to worry about just 1 fee instead of half a
dozen? We think so too.

- You do not have to own a home
- You do not need another mortgage
- No credit checks required
- Approval within 10 business days
- Available to all US citizens

For a FREE, no obligation, consultation, please fill out
the form below and return it to us. Paying bills should
not be a chore, and your life should be as easy and
simple as possible. So take advantage of this great offer!

Please note that we deal in unsecured debt, so mortgages
and car loans etc. cannot apply. Please enter 'N/A' where
appropriate. Work phone can be a secondary/cell number.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Full Name           :
Street Address      :
City                :
State               :
Zip Code            :
Home Phone          :
Work Phone          :
Time to Call        :
Estimated Debt Size :

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Thank You

To receive no further offers from our company regarding
this matter or any other matter, please reply to this
e-mail with the word 'Remove' in the subject line.


This briefly reports on the status of the production of in-state Enron
documents to the depository in Sacramento:

. Approximately 30,000 documents are now in the Sacramento depository. All
are bate stamped. These documents are primarily ISO related documents and
appear not to raise serious confidentiality concerns. We notified ISO we
were going to produce these documents and they were reviewed for privilege
by  outside counsel for ISO. She requested we withhold certain documents for
privilege and we did so at her request. We will mark these on a privilege
log and direct Dunn to ISO counsel if he wishes to contest the claim of
privilege.  Dunne's representatives have not reviewed any of the documents
in Sacramento to date.  We propose to staff the depository upon  reasonable
notice from the Committee that they wish to review documents. We should send
them a letter that says we require such notice.
.There are approximately another 20,000 documents at our firm that are
potentially responsive to the subpoena. Many of these documents do appear to
raised confidentiality issues. We have sent examples of these documents to
many of you and await your comments before we ready them for production. We
will not produce them in Sacramento without further discussion on the issue.
Included in these 20,000 documents are documents from the IEP trade
association. We need to speak to the attorney's representing the IEP before
production.
.We have not completed a privilege review of unproduced hard copy documents
in San Francisco, nor completed a privilege log, pending further discussion
on this issue with Mike Kirby.
. We believe we have identified most potentially responsive hard copy
documents in Enron's San Francisco office. However, we have  reviewed very
few electronic documents, including e-mail. We propose to do so next week
for the following individuals only: Dave Parquet, Sue Mara, and Mike
McDonald. We will need clearance from Richard to enable us to do so
effectively.

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2000 04:13
PM ---------------------------
From: Heidi Griffith@EES on 03/14/2000 04:25 PM EST
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@Enron, James T Javins/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Conversion of Gatherco Stations

Effective 04/1/2000, Columbia Gas Transmission will be transferring certain
facilities to Gatherco, Inc.  There should have been a message in Columbia
Navigator stating that there were certain meters that were going out of your
IPP pool 37147 effective 4/2000.  The subject for this e-mail message was
"Appalachian Meter Allocation".  The meters listed in this e-mail will now be
on Gatherco's gathering lines and are going to be subject to the $.25
gathering rate.  Per Dave Fusek at Gatherco, our final estimates for 04/2000
SHOULD reflect these meters that were changed from Columbia Gas Transmission
to Gatherco.  He said he is not 100% positive that they will get this
finished in time, but they are hoping to have everything complete by the time
they release our nominations.

Gloria and Wade,

You will need to make sure you have the correct charges associated with these
meters.  Some of these meters were previously subject to Columbia's $.27
gathering and some were straight transmission, which did not have any
gathering.  Again, these meters will now have a $.25 gathering charge.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Heidi Griffith


Here is the most updated file.
PL


Please let me know your Executive's availability for an EWS Budget Meeting on Tuesday, May 1 @ 11:00 a.m.  Please note that the budget meetings will be every Tuesday @ 11:00 a.m. for the month of May.  The meetings should be no more than 1 hour.  I'll advise you of the location.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor


Hi Vince, Stinson

Thank you for hosting my visit to Enron and arranging for me to meet
with you and other decision-makers at Enron. The meetings been very
productive on my side, as I try to formulate the project more
clearly.

We are entering the period that I have to set up the Research Assistantships
(RA)
for next year for Giuseppe and the other student I have committed to support
on this project. School starts in late September, but already I have to
start putting together the papers for the RAs in the Fall, as per departmental
requirement.

Would it be possible to put the project in place soon, so that I can
do the RAship papers for the students? I expect I will start having
pressure from the department to do the paperwork for these RAships early
September, and I have to have them in place by the third week of September,
just before school starts.

I am attaching below the same DRAFT of a letter I had sent you in a previous
e-mail, which would be required to set up the project at Stanford. Please,
let me know how you would like to proceed.

Again, thanks for your hospitality and I look forward to productive
collaboration
during the coming year and beyond.

Best Regards,

Nick

PS: Vince, I look forward to seeing you during your visit to the Bay Area
in October.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DRAFT of letter to be sent from Enron to Stanford.

Prof. Nicholas Bambos
420 Terman Engineering Center
Management Science & Eng. Dept. and
Electrical Engineering Department
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305

Dear Nick,

We are happy to provide gift funds of $100,000 per year, over
three years, to support a program in your research group, related
to Bandwidth Markets/Trading and Networking Technologies.

Enron would like to support research activities in the above
mentioned area, including Pd.D. student work, research seminars etc.
There may also be opportunities to have the supported Ph.D. students
do summer internships at Enron, related to their research interests.

Please find enclosed a check of $100,000 payable to Stanford University
for supporting this research effort in your group during the first year.

Best Regards,

Name and Title


Kori,

Do me a favor and check the RAC website before you leave at night to make sure all your Post I.D.'s are official.

Thanks,

Errol


1st Comments from Scott

We are missing:

Positive spin at front
Governor Davis is committed to solving the California energy crisis by:
Developing consumer driven solutions
Protecting customers from short term market aberrations
Continuing to expand the consumers ability to choose
We are missing thoughtful Orderly Process
Maintain 1890 in interim
All customers treated the same
Would replace "maintain a reliable distribution network" with "assure
investment community"
Assurances around forward purchases
Assurances around prudent purchases to keep lights
Assurances, if needed through increases, via tax refundable.
Maintain AB1890 until orderly process arrives with better solution
Would drop specifics arount rate increase.

More to come......


You are beginning to realize that time goes by awfully fast and we had better
enjoy what we are doing while we are doing it.  You never get another chance
at today!!  End of my phiposophical analysis of life for tday!

You are welcome to the car.  I will try to bring it tonight or better still
can your Mom bring you over to get it tomorrow.  Either way is ok.

Daddy


Attached is the resume and interview schedule for Amy Kim's visit to Enron on
Tuesday, April 3.

Amy worked at Enron last summer.  She is a very bright young woman. We are
looking for a possible fit for her in the Govt. Affairs organization.  Thanks
for spending some time with Amy while she's in town.

INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
AMY KIM
Tuesday, April 3, 2001

          ROOM

8:30 am) 9:30 am  Steve Kean     EB 4799

9:30 am )10:00 am  Jim Steffes     EB 4799

11:30 am ) 1:00 pm  Lunch w/ Sue Nord

1:00 pm ) 1:30 pm  Rob Bradley     EB 4799

1:30 pm ) 2:00 pm  Christi Nicolay     EB 3801

2:00 pm ) 2:30 pm  Harry Kingerski    EB 4799

2:30 pm   Beal's car to airport


Although this makes a lot of sense, how are going to implement it?  We plan
to scale massively and I cannot imagine that this will be efficient enough to
facilitate the time frames and number of reference credits that we are
anticipating.  I think that we need to have a general policy that we can look
to instead of approving them on a one off basis.

Let's discuss

Tomas Valnek
19/05/2000 11:42
To: ECT London Credit Trading, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Credit Trading - Approval Form

Attached is an Approval Form that will have to be completed to request if we
want to trade with a new counterparty or on a new reference credit. I have
incorporated comments from Origination, Credit and Legal. But should you have
any further comments please let me know ASAP, as I plan to introduce this
form by the middle of next week. (Note that there will be two forms, one for
bankruptcy swaps and one for other credit derivatives.)

Regards

Tomas


EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints - Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		  Get up to 100MB of FREE Webspace!
		Sign up for a FREE Internet Hard Drive account. Xdrive lets you securely
store, access and share all your files from any computer, anytime. Keep your
MP3, text, and graphic files online and free up your hard drive. Get your
FREE Xdrive NOW! Click  here for more details.

		Health & Fitness Tip of the Day
		Friday November 17, 2000

		Push-Ups By Design

		Doing push-ups immediately gives us visions of military punishment. But yours
don't have to be torture, because there are many ways to tailor this exercise
to your fitness level. Keep in mind that what makes push-ups difficult or
easy is the amount of pressure on your arms. Once you're in the traditional
push-up stance, you can lessen the pressure by allowing your knees to rest on
the floor (modified push-up stance). You can increase the pressure by putting
your feet up on a weight bench or chair, causing you to lean more on your
arms. Also, moving your hands farther apart or closer together works
different muscles.

		- Mariam Ballantine

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives
		[IMAGE]

		 HEALTH BOOK OF THE DAY
		Robin A. McKenzie: 7 Steps to a Pain-Free Life

		Bush vs. Gore:  the cam-pain continues.
		Seek relief on the inDecision2000 'Vine.

		Got something to say?
		Hello...I love you...Congratulations...Thinking of you...Happy birthday.
Whatever you wanna say, let Emazing's e-greetings say it for you! We have
hundreds of the coolest greetings around. They're fun, FREE, and easy to
send. Click here for more information.

		Our e-greetings aren't turkeys...
		But we have plenty with turkeys on them to celebrate your holiday
get-togethers and feasts!

		JobsOnline is giving away $10,000 instant cash!
		JobsOnline is one of the Internet's leading sites for employment information
and career resources.

		     QUOTE OF THE DAY
		I,m not like George Bush. If he wins or loses, life goes on. I,ll do anything
to win.
		- Al Gore

		 [IMAGE]

		  Does "email program" mean "geek Greek" to you?
		Don't let email confuse you! Get FREE Outlook 2000 tips from EMAZING. Soon
you'll be setting up folders, sending tricky attachments, customizing your
views, and scheduling appointments. It's as easy as 1-2-3 with these tips!
Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


dailies trade 27 and 29
bom trades 27.75
feb trades 29.5

----------------------------------------------
Clinton Kripki
GFI Group Inc.
Phone:  212 968 2813
email:  clinton.kripki@gfinet.com
website:  www.gfinet.com

***************************************************************
Confidentiality note: This e-mail contains information from the
GFI Group Inc. and/or its affiliates, including GFInet inc.,
that is confidential and/or legally privileged.   This
information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity named on this e-mail.  This e-mail and its content may
not be reproduced or retransmitted without the express written
permission of The GFI Group.
***************************************************************


Concur Expense (XMS) Upgrade!

On July 2, 2001, Enron's Corporate Expense Management Solution will undergo an upgrade to version 6.0.2.
The Integrated Solution Center (ISC) has developed a transition plan containing several important deadlines affecting
all XMS users.

							Transition Schedule

Important Date #1 - Monday, June 18th
?	American Express transactions will no longer be loaded into the current XMS system starting June 18th.  Beginning June 18th, all AMEX transactions will be loaded into the new Concur Expense (XMS) system.
? 	Beginning June 18th, the ISC will be solely responsible for adding new users to the current XMS system.  On July 2nd, new users created in SAP HR will be 	automatically loaded into the new Concur Expense (XMS) system.

Important Date #2 - Wednesday, June 27th
?	This marks the deadline for entering new expense reports into the current XMS system.  All open expense reports in XMS must be submitted and approved 	by June 27th.  All users will be locked out of XMS after this date!!

Important Date #3 - Monday, July 2nd
?	The new version of Concur Expense (XMS ver. 6.0.2) goes LIVE!!!

For a list of frequently asked questions (FAQ), please click on the following link:  http://isc.enron.com/site/xmsfaqs.htm

If you have any other questions on any of the above items, please contact the ISC Call Center at 713-345-4727.


Vince

Thank you for the update.  I will be back in the office January 8.

Have a great New Year

Gerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 5:35 PM
To: gsheble@iastate.edu
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: RE: Hello

Gerry,

Let me review my calendar in the beginning of the next year and I shall
E-mail you
with a suggested date. My assistant will update my schedule for 2001 in the
first week
of January and I shall be able to select a date for ypur presentaton.

Vince Kaminski

"Sheble, G.B." <gsheble@iastate.edu> on 12/21/2000 10:43:50 AM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Hello

Dear Mr. Kaminski

Please excuse the cancellation due to illness.  The students do not care
who
they infect near the end of the semester, they just want to get done!

Here is my available schedule for next year.  I am now overloaded next week
with tasks to complete the semester.  I do hope that we can reschedule
during the first quarter next year.

I would note that my schedule is most free for Thursday or Friday.  I could
fly out late Wednesday night.

Cordially,

Gerry

Teaching Schedule
M 11-12
T and R 10-12 and 2-4
T 12-2 EP&ES Seminar
M 6-8
T 6-8
W 6-8
(R=Thursday)
Workshops:
Jan 12-13 Des Moines
Jan 26-27 Des Moines
Feb 9-10  Des Moines

IEEE WPM Conference
Feb 28-31 Columbus, Ohio


Kim,
The attached list contains some counterparties that were previously on the Master Termination Log and have now been determined to be valid terminations.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000
10:58 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
10/27/2000 10:54 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Vallejo/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deals in the MGMT-WEST book

Stacey -

Darron is controller for the west region,  and he should be able to take care
of this and point you in the right direction for future issues.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000
10:55 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
10/27/2000 10:49 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deals in the MGMT-WEST book

Hi Jeff,

I'm hoping you're the person who takes care of this book.  If not, could
you please forward this message to the appropriate person.  There are
a few deals in the MGMT-WEST book that need to be moved to the
FT-US/CAND-ERMS BOOK.  These are all EnronOnline deals so they
were put into this book automatically.

Q24809.1
Q47957.1
Q50596.1

Could you please tell everyone down there that books deals into Houston
books, to make sure that there aren't any ECC deals with counterparties
in these books.  Nymex closes today, and I'm going to have to start invoicing
on Monday, so I need to have all deals with ECC in the FT-US/CAND-ERMS
book by the end of today.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this matter.

Thanks for your help
Stacey


Steve,

How are things going with this request?

FYI.  The majority of deals we transact on Oasis are done as HPLC.  Only
sales to LCRA and term sales to Tufco are done as ENA.

Thanks.

Daren
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000
04:44 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dan J Hyvl                           03/22/2000 01:00 PM

To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transport contracts

Please forward this to whoever in the Pipeline group does transport,
especially Oasis, and I disagree that it should be HPL cause most of the
things off Oasis are ENA and will continue to be.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000 12:56 PM
---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
03/22/2000 12:05 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transport contracts

Dan,

ENA - Texas currently has tranport contracts on PGEV and Oasis pipelines
(listed below).  Since we are transacting as Houston Pipe Line for the
majority of our trades, we need these contractsto be assigned from ENA to
HPL.  Or, we need to enter into new agreements as HPL.  What is the process
used to accomlish this?  We would like to get this set up as soon as we can.

Thanks.

Daren
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000
12:00 PM ---------------------------
Stacey Neuweiler   03/21/2000 12:21 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transport contracts

D-

The Oasis contract #s are:  028 27099 201
        028 27099 202
        028 27099 203
        028 27099 204

PG&E contract #s are: 5095-037
   5098-695
   9121
   5203-010

PG&E parking and lending contracts awaiting approval: PLE00004
       PLA00004


Another one for your file...SRS

download attachment
 - Monica.jpg


Per our conversation while you were here, attached is a list of all the
Japanese counterparties that have requested Password Applications from
EnronOnline.  Let me know you thoughts about this, and, as we discussed,
online due diligence with respect to Japanese counterparties.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 11:56 AM -----

	Lisa Lees
	10/05/2000 08:53 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Japan PAs

Let me know if you need anything else.


Status report of integration testing from Friday, Jan. 18th (executed subset of Gas/ Power scenarios to test that all platform components are setup)

Thanks to all those involved in user integration testing last week.  Numerous issues were identified and resolved throughout testing, and many people worked late Friday evening (and weekend) to resolve outstanding issues.  Infrastructure made super headway with creating the NetCo nc_t_xxxx id's and quickly addressing the startup script issues.

A spreadsheet is attached of the outstanding/ resolved issues.  Issues could be resolved but not confirmed through testing, or not communicated back to the test team.  If any testing issues are missing and not reflected, please email Terry Sanvido or myself to assist with tracking and resolution.

Canada/ Portland testing
Some users were able to test/ validate their startup/ applications.  The NetCo terminal server (<http://remoteservices.netco.enron.com>) is available (Trading Cluster, GPC).  We are requesting for the Canada/ Portland users to test according to the schedule below.  Richard McKeel will assist with escalation to Houston.
 <http://remoteservices.netco.enron.com/>

Where we left off with testing:
Gas testing                       Unify volume management, logistics, and Settlements; awaiting data replication fix.
Power testing                   Kelley Huntley/ Unify Settlements; awaiting data replication fix.
Financial testing                Mechelle Stevens/ Unify Settlements; awaiting data replication fix.
Canada/ Portland testing   Some testing conducted; awaiting any issues

Schedule for Tuesday 01/22 - resolve issues and complete subset testing scripts
9:00am daily IT status meeting.  Review spreadsheet and discuss any issues outstanding from testing.  Work to resolve all issues before user testing startup at 1:00pm.

1:00pm - 4:00pm Continue with subset testing scripts
     (1) Continue with testing left off on Friday - mainly Unify and SAP
     (2) Canada/ Portland to continue pre-testing and report issues
     (3) Re-validate any open issues from last week that are resolved but not confirmed
     - Bridgeline open to discuss issues (800-711-8000; code #3454709)

4:00 pm - IT to continue with testing of deletion/ truncation scripts to prepare for Wednesday

Last week's testing - not all systems have removed their estate data
Given application unit testing was crossing the same schedule as user integration testing, not all systems have completely deleted (truncated) their estate data (contracts, desks/ portfolios, estate data, addresses).  The next user test needs to be conducted in an environment that emulates a 'go live' for Netco.
It's requested for all IT systems to have completed removal of data (truncation scripts) by 10:00am on Wednesday.  Global will have to repush the NetCo data before the testing.

Schedule for Wednesday 01/23 (complete set of scenarios to be tested)
(1) By 11:00am - all IT systems to have deleted any estate data & backups completed
(2) 11:00am - Global to repush any setup data if needed
(3) 12:00pm - global data setup by users
(4) 1:00pm - 5:00pm User integration test of all test scenarios.  The goal is to test 'end to end' to ensure the all issues are resolved, and data removal and resetup is valid.
- Bridgeline open to discuss issues (800-711-8000; code #3454709)

We appreciate your support as we work towards setting up the NETCO!

-----Original Message-----
From: Saleem, Aftab
Sent: Thu 1/17/2002 5:19 PM
To: Hare, Bill D.; Rodriguez, Bernice; Richardson, Stacey; Campos, Sylvia A.; Sweitzer, Tara; Kenne, Dawn C.; Garcia, Clarissa; Severson, Russ; Winfree, O'Neal D.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Campos, Anthony; Hunter, Larry Joe; Baker, Natalie; Spears, Christopher; Price, Wade R.; Severson, Russ; Denton, Rhonda L.; Lozano, Melba; Murphy, Melissa; Bentley, Corry; Dahlke, Andrea; Stevens, Mechelle; Robinson, Rhonda; Greig, Iain; Sanvido, Terry; Smith, Regan M.; Seib, Dianne; Reeves, Kathy; Gillis, Brian; Dawes, Cheryl; Hibbert, Greg; Amador, Susan; Steiner, David; Marryott, Michael; McKeel, Richard; Vander velde, Nikole
Cc:
Subject: Updated: NETCO Testing

When: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:00 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: 2521, 2525

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Hi,
Please see the attached document with the correct date that corresponds with the meeting request. In addition, the Canadian and Portland users are also included. The Bridgeline (800-711-8000 CODE 3454709) will be open during this time for us discuss and resolve issues.

Thanks
<< (01)0118 User_Test_ Schedule Netco.doc >>
Hi,
Attached is schedule for NETCO testing for Friday afternoon. The objectives for tomorrow will be to:

1. Test logins for NETCO users and drive mappings
2. Execute a subset of the Gas and Power scenarios to test that all platform components are setup.

The complete set of scenarios will be tested next week. We appreciate your support as we work towards setting up the NETCO platform which has a number of moving parts that are coming together.

Thanks
Aftab


WOOHOOO!

From: Sara Shackleton on 05/31/2001 01:56 PM
To: Gennaro.Contella@chase.com@ENRON
cc: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen Su/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: GTA SURVEY and License Agreement

Gennaro:

Nancy Callahan and I are agreed with respect to the Global Custody
Agreement.  She will email the final version today and I will have it
executed immediately.  Nancy suggested that I return the executed documents
to her attention.  We will fax the executed agreement to you as well.  Laurel
(713-853-7035) needs to hear from you how quickly we will be ready for
trading.  Please give her a call if you have not spoken recently.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Gennaro.Contella@chase.com
	05/31/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com, laurel.adams@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: GTA SURVEY and License Agreement

Sara / Laurel,

Just following up on the GTA information we will require to install GTA in
your office. I have attached the legal agreement and the surveys for stand
alone users and LAN (multiple) users. Please don't hesitate to call me with
any questions you might have.

(See attached file: GTA_SURVEY2_Stand_Alone.doc)(See attached file:
GTA_SURVEY_Multi_User_Clre_blank.doc)(See attached file: GTA_LEG
AGREEMENT.doc)

 - GTA_SURVEY2_Stand_Alone.doc
 - GTA_SURVEY_Multi_User_Clre_blank.doc
 - GTA_LEG AGREEMENT.doc


We are going to hold the limits the same in this contract, and take the extra
on the purchase on the replacement equipment.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/02/2001 02:44:55 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

The Unit Liability Amount for the Salmon Energy Agreement is currently
$14,103,675, yet Lee Johnson's e-mail (contained herein) indicates that
the price for Unit 28 is $15,769,725.  Looks like we may have to
increase the Maximum Liability Amount, Unit Liability Amount and the
payments under the payment schedule.  Let me know how what you think.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:39 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Units will be 19, 20, 23, 28 (no serial # on 28).  I think the amounts
and
pricing stays the same.

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/02/2001 11:13:42 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

No problem.  Let me know how the pricing schedule will be affected.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

I guess go back to the original contract performance numbers.  The other
numbers must be specific to the site for the Las Vegas project.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/02/2001 11:05:25 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

I changed the performance numbers in Section 10.7 and 10.8 to reflect
the changes requested by Lee Johnson in his 3/12 e-mail that you
forwarded to me on 3/16.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Hi Pete,

Are the performance numbers the same as the original master numbers?  I
recall some email traffic on this.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001
10:22
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/02/2001 08:15:48 AM

To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  RE: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Kay,

Is Salmon LLC the Delta Power project?  The unit 25-28 prices are $
15,769,725 per unit.  Unit 28 Guaranteed Delivery Date (=ex-works ship
date)
is 31 December, 2001.  A unit serial number has not been assigned to
date.

I don't know how your business teams on LV and Delta agreements are
distributing pricing and want to show payment and termination schedules
between the 2 deals.  Maybe you can poll Steve Thome, Bill Williams and
Jake
Thomas to get these answers.

For Salmon, the performance values in Section 10 will be per the 24 unit
master contract.
I'm in New Orleans today, reachable via cell phone 713-823-2055.

Regards,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 5:50 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Subject: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Hi Lee,

Here is the new turbine contract, blacklined against the March 27
version.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001
05:48
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 03/30/2001 04:02:01 PM

To:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>

Subject:  Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

     Attached please find a clean copy of the Salmon Energy Turbine
Agreement (the second document below), which includes Lee Johnson's
proposed changes to Section 10.7, as well as a blackline (first document
below) showing changes to the (3/27) version you forwarded earlier
today. I have include notes within the agreement indicationg those
places where questions remain - e.g., how the addition of the new
turbine affects the pricing schedule, guaranteed delivery, etc.
 <<Comparison of Version 5 of the LV Cogen to Version 1 of the Salmon
Energy Agreement.DOC>>  <<Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 2.DOC>>
(See attached file: Comparison of Version 5 of the LV Cogen to Version 1
of
the Salmon Energy Agreement.DOC)
(See attached file: Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 2.DOC)


For each of the last 15 years the Enron Kids Committee has chosen an under-privileged HISD elementary school and offered to "sponsor" every child in that school.  What we mean by "sponsor" is that we outfit the child from head to toe plus give each of them a toy and book.  The presents are then handed out to the children at their school Holiday Party in December.  For most of these kids, it is their only Christmas present.

I am once again coordinating the volunteer / adoption efforts for ETS.  Some ETS departments and employees have already sponsored a child-- thanks for your support.  But thus far, we have only adopted 216 of 468 children.  We need more help!!!!

If you would like to participate, I will coordinate collections and adoptions.  Simply reply back to this email with the amount you would like to contribute.  It costs about $100 to "sponsor" each child.  Last year we were able to adopt 18 children.

All the funds collected will be matched by the Enron Foundation.  The matching funds will be used to buy books and computers for the school.   I will also need volunteers for shopping.  If you would like to shop for the kids we sponsor, please let me know.

Thanks for your support!!
Kevin Hyatt x35559 & The Enron Kids Committee


Sounds spiffy.  df

Susan Scott
01/05/2001 11:24 AM
To: Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ETS Newco

Drew -- if you have any objection to either of the names please speak now!
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 01/05/2001
11:24 AM ---------------------------

Susan Scott
01/05/2001 11:23 AM
To: Lillian Bailey/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Geneva Holland/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ETS Newco

Lillian, please advise whether the following two names are available for TW's
new company:

Mavrix Corp.
New West Transportation Trading Corp.

Sorry to leave you hanging for so long on this.  I told my commercial people
I hoped they had more enthusiasm about naming their children!

If you could let me know before COB Monday I'd appreciate it.

Questions -- I'm at x30596.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 01/05/2001
11:20 AM ---------------------------

Susan Scott
12/07/2000 11:35 AM
To: Lillian Bailey/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Drew Fossum@ENRON

Subject: ETS Newco

Lillian, please see the attached authorization memo.  It is still in draft
form, but since time is of the essence, Geneva advised me to forward it to
you now so that you could start working on it.  We would like to have the new
company formed today if possible.  I will let you know if I make any changes
to the attached.  In the meantime, please do not hesitate to call if you have
questions.

Susan Scott
x30596


http://www.co.clackamas.or.us/dtd/surreal/
http://www.co.travis.tx.us/tax_assessor/foreclosure/sales.asp
http://www.creonline.com/articl85.htm
http://www.aarons-investments.com/forum.htm


Enron is the...

v Most Innovative Company in America -  Five Consecutive Years
v Number One Energy/Commodity House - 2000
v Top Company for Quality of Management -  2000
v Second Best Company for Employee Talent -  2000

and the

v Number One BEST Place to Work in America  -  2001
Wouldn,t this be GREAT!

Yesterday, 250 of Fortune,s "100 Best Companies to Work for in America"
surveys were mailed to randomly selected U.S.-based employees.  Please check
your home mailbox to see if you were selected to participate in the survey.

Enron,s goal is to be in the Top 10 on Fortune,s list, up from our current
rank of No. 24 on this prestigious list.  The feedback you provide in the
survey is a key element in the evaluation process.  Your honest and open
responses, as well as written comments about your personal Enron experiences,
will help Enron achieve this goal.

Thanks for all you do everyday to make Enron the best place to work.


The print version had some good tables showing retail rate increases accross
the west ....

http://www.latimes.com/business/reports/power/lat_west010226.htm
Back to story

Most of West in the Same Power Jam as California
 Utilities: Other states ran their grids at fever pitches as populations
swelled and few new energy sources were developed. Now, also facing
blackouts, they want to tilt balance of power away from the Golden State and
toward themselves.

By PETER G. GOSSELIN, Times Staff Writer

     WINTERSBURG, Ariz.--For more than a century, California ran a simple
account with the rest of the West: It demanded and the West supplied, most
especially water and power.
     But as the Western states have ballooned in the last decade--in no small
part because of an outbound trek of Californians--this simple, supply-demand
relationship has broken down.
     Fundamentally, the rest of the West has outgrown its electrical system
just as California has its own. And it has done so in very much the same
way--by adding too many people without enough new power or conservation.
     Indeed, statistics show that much of the rest of the West would have
been on the verge of trouble even without California's help and may yet face
the sort of rolling blackouts that have wreaked so much havoc in the Golden
State.
     The booming Southwest has run its power grid at such a fever pitch that
its planning reserves--the extra power that utilities build in to handle
emergencies--have shrunk to levels that many regulators and industry experts
consider dangerous.
     Almost none of the West save Montana has increased its power production
at anything like the pace of its population growth during the last decade.
Despite the long economic boom of the 1990s, which smiled especially on the
West, several, such as Arizona, have failed to complete a single new power
plant.
     "We don't know how bad it's going to be yet," said Utah's Republican
governor, Mike Leavitt. "We won't know that until May, June, July and August,
when everyone in the Southwest turns on their swamp coolers."
     In trying to dodge the blackout bullet, many Western leaders are seeking
to force a great change on the region: to renegotiate their states' basic
deal with California. They want to end an old relationship--that between
center and hinterland, colonizer and colonized--and establish a new one that
could curtail California's long regional dominance.
     In the strange chemistry of the moment--when a once-Republican state
government has turned Democratic and a once-Democratic national government
has turned Republican, when the battle is to a large extent over privately
owned electricity rather than publicly controlled water--they could actually
meet with some success.
     "California spent the 20th century decolonizing itself from Wall Street
and the East," said Kevin Starr, the state librarian and author of a
multivolume history of California. "Now, all of a sudden, there's a dramatic
possibility of it being recolonized, at least in part, by the rest of the
West."

     Captive Plants Feed Power to California
     Ground zero for these changes lies 50 miles west of Phoenix in the dry
scrublands of Wintersburg. This is home to the Palo Verde nuclear facility,
now the nation's single biggest power producer. It will soon be home as well
to between three and six new gas-fired power plants that, combined, will
produce even more electricity than their giant neighbor.
     Palo Verde represents a great deal about the old, fraying world of
regulated utilities and about the supply-demand relationships that California
once maintained with the rest of the West.
     More than one-quarter of the plant is owned by Los Angeles' municipal
utility, the Department of Water and Power, several other California cities
and Southern California Edison.
     A row of steel latticework towers runs off toward California, carrying a
transmission line from plant to consumer. California has big stakes in a
half-dozen similarly captive plants in an arc of states from Nevada to New
Mexico.
     From California's point of view, the beauty of these projects has been
that they provided near-certain power without the muss of meeting state
pollution standards or the political hassle of building closer to home.
     And at least until the mid-1990s, California regulators virtually
guaranteed that their owners covered their costs and made profits, even if
plants' power wasn't immediately needed.
     "The first principle of the old system was that you had to be able to
meet demand, no matter what," said Paul L. Joskow, a veteran utility
economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
     "If you had too much power, if it cost you a little too much, that was
less important than being sure you could meet demand." And, he added, "you
had regulators watching to make sure you did."
     The gas-fired plants that are about to pop up in Wintersburg are also
representative, but of the new, deregulated world of power production.
Although they will crowd in around Palo Verde and tap into the same
California transmission line, they are being built on an entirely different
business premise: selling power to the highest bidder.
     In fact, the reason this empty patch of desert has become such an
electricity hot spot lately is not Palo Verde itself, but its huge
transmission lines. In addition to the California line, four others fan out
from the plant: two back to Phoenix, one east to New Mexico, and one north to
Utah and from there to the Northwest.
     All were built to hard-wire the nuclear project to its owners. But they
are now seen as the means by which a new breed of producer can get top dollar
by sending power wherever prices are highest.
     "It used to be generating capacity was built by people who looked at the
market to see if they could meet demand," said Jack Davis, president of
Pinnacle West Capital Corp., which owns Arizona's major utility and is
putting up two of the Wintersburg plants.
     "Now," he said approvingly, "it's being built by people who look at the
market to see if you can make a lot of money."

     Plans Go Awry in Many States
     Money, not the watchful eye of government, was what was supposed to
assure that electricity deregulation worked. The opportunity to make it would
cause investors to flock to the electricity business, ensuring that plenty of
new power plants got built.
     If too many went up, it would be investors, not ratepayers, who
suffered. If too few, then high prices would attract still more investors,
more plants and, ultimately, more power.
     But to date, almost nothing about deregulation has gone as planned--and
not just in California, but in the West in general.
     Take Arizona. The state has a hands-off attitude toward business,
including its utilities. It has almost none of the environmental restrictions
blamed for keeping California from putting up the new plants it needs.
     Its population grew by 40% from 1990 to 2000, according to the Census
Bureau. And its demand for electricity expanded at nearly twice that rate,
according to industry figures.
     "Arizona should have been a power producer's heaven," said A. Michael
Schaal, a senior analyst with Energy Ventures Analysis Inc., a prominent
Washington-area consulting firm.
     But Arizona's power production rose a mere 4% during the 1990s, mostly
as a result of improving existing plants. Until 18 months ago, no one had
applied to build a major power plant since Palo Verde in the late 1980s.
     "I guess I go on the assumption that the utilities plan with some sort
of 10-, 20-, 30-year time horizon," Arizona's Republican Gov. Jane Dee Hull
said in a recent interview. "I think what we all worry about is: Are they
planning?"
     Or Nevada. Its utilities apparently did plan and increased
electricity-making capacity between 1990 and 2000 by a substantial 44%. But
that wasn't enough to keep up with the state's population, which increased
66%. On Thursday, Nevada Gov. Kenny Guinn, a Republican and former energy
company executive, indefinitely halted deregulation in his state.
     Or traditionally energy-rich Washington state. One of its major
utilities, Seattle City Light, recently learned that all of its previously
planned supply increase for the next four years will be consumed, and then
some, by just three new customers: computer server farms being built to
handle the growing Internet traffic in and out of the high-tech capital.
     But it's unlikely to be able to get extra power soon because regional
supplies are balanced on a "razor's edge," according to Northwest Power Pool
President Jerry Rust. "We have no cushion."
     Indeed, the electricity supplies of the entire West are balanced on a
razor's edge, with a variety of forecasters predicting serious shortages this
summer.
     Schaal, the Washington-area consultant, for example, said the region
will come up 6% short. "Westerners can expect 150 to 275 hours of rolling
blackouts, most of them in California," he said.
     One of the most striking aspects of the current situation is that, in
contrast to what most people think, supplies have not grown short just
recently.
     They have been perilously tight for the last several years--before the
start of California's troubles of this summer and fall, and before the
near-record dry winter that has left the Northwest dangerously short of water
for its hydroelectric dams.
     The implication is that California did not cause other states to run
short of power so much as trigger events that exposed their danger. It did
that, according to key observers, with one monumentally inept maneuver.
     When California required its major utilities to buy power in the
volatile spot market and simultaneously prohibited them from passing along
higher costs to consumers, it set off a furious price spiral.
     That effectively stripped the entire region of its energy security
blanket, the assurance that it could buy extra power relatively inexpensively
if local supplies proved inadequate.
     The result has been a string of crises across the West.
     In southern Arizona, for example, the San Carlos Irrigation Project, a
tiny public utility that tried to jump into the deregulation vanguard by
dropping long-term contracts in hopes of more power at lower prices in the
spot market, has announced that its bills are going up 300%. Most of the
project's 13,300 poor customers say they can't pay.
     In Phoenix, utility executives who had confidently said the state was
rich with new power projects about to come on line have decided to pull two
50-year-old steam plants out of mothballs and rent a pair of portable
generators to reduce purchases from the expensive spot market.
     In Idaho, the big power company is appealing to potato farmers to skip
planting and sell the electricity they would use running irrigation pumps
back to the firm. Company executives figure the buyback will be cheaper than
purchasing power on the open market--and the potato farmers are likely to do
pretty well themselves.

     Deep Hostility in Rest of the West
     The subtle difference between California's triggering recent events and
actually causing the region's crisis is largely lost in the current
atmosphere of apprehension and upheaval. Although leaders of the rest of the
West are scrupulously evenhanded in commenting to outsiders about their big
neighbor, they are less guarded at home.
     The normally mild-mannered Leavitt, for example, was recently quoted as
warning a Salt Lake City audience that "California, if given the chance,
would put a shunt into our veins and bleed us pretty quickly." (In an
interview, he denied having made the remark.)
     Such comments reflect an old and easily rekindled view among Westerners
that their states are, in the words of historian Bernard DeVoto, "plundered
provinces"--terrain that first Easterners and then Californians have
regularly raided for minerals, water and, most recently, power.
     But this time, some Western leaders think they can change all this. "A
lot of people see an opportunity to rewrite the fundamental relationship with
California to their advantage," said Stanford historian Richard White.
     The attempts at rewriting are taking shape across the West.
     In the Northwest, Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Montana are redoubling
their efforts to take over the Bonneville Power Administration, the huge,
federally controlled generating system on the Columbia and Snake rivers that
is one of California's chief sources of summer electricity.
     "The crisis has highlighted the danger that power generated in the
region can be exported without the region's consent," Oregon Gov. John
Kitzhaber said in an interview.
     In Arizona, state officials have gone from having no proposals for new
power plants to being buried by them. Regulators recently approved the
construction of 10 plants, including several around Palo Verde, and are
considering another eight.
     Although they are requiring the plants to temporarily serve Arizona's
needs first, the facilities will soon be able to sell their power for
whatever prices they can command, an arrangement that could leave California
just one among many bidders.
     (Federal officials are unlikely to get in the way: Gov. Hull is close to
President Bush, who in turn has shown little interest in helping Democratic
California.)
     Perhaps the most aggressive efforts at change are occurring in Utah,
where Leavitt is trying something that could become California's worst
nightmare--recalling power that Utah produces for the state.
     Los Angeles' DWP and several other California utilities own
three-quarters of the huge, coal-fired Intermountain Power Project in
west-central Utah, and have been drawing on it without incident for 15 years.
     But Utah officials recently unearthed a long-forgotten provision in
their agreement with the plant's owners that gives them the right, with
proper notice, to recall power for local use.
     The state has already notified Los Angeles that it is taking back 50
megawatts of electricity capacity this summer and another 170 next summer,
and it may be able to take back still more, according to plant general
manager Reed Searle.
     Although the amounts are trivial--the Los Angeles utility either owns or
has firm contracts for more than 7,000 megawatts of capacity--Leavitt said
Utah will demand similar recall provisions in agreements for any new plants
in the state, including a 500- to 750-megawatt facility that Los Angeles is
negotiating to build.
     "California has chosen not to create its own power generation and has
depended on us to do that," the Utah governor said. "That's fine and we're
willing to do that.
     "But," he added, "there comes a point at which, if demand grows too
large, we've got to hold some of this capacity back for ourselves, and for
our children and grandchildren."
     If Utah and the rest of the West have reached that point, California
could be in for a much bigger and more enduring shock than the one from which
it now suffers.

---
     Times researcher Lynn Marshall in Seattle contributed to this report.

Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times


Hey Buddy!  Small note - on row 45 you show fuel of 19% instead of 1.90%

	From:  Jim Homco                           03/28/2001 11:59 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Revised


First of all congratulations on completing your degree.  Having completed my Masters degree by going to school at nights and Saturdays while working full time I know first hand the commitment that takes.  I suggest that you work through Mary Ellen in trying to find the right position.  She knows Gary Smith, VP of HR for ETS.  Between the two of them they should be able to offer you the right advise.  Keep me informed.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Autumn_Cartier@eott.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Autumn+5FCartier+40eott+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:33 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Subject:	Employee Development/Growth

Stan,

I had the opportunity to participate in the Table Talk session yesterday at
EOTT and want to follow up with you on the topic of employee growth and
development.  Thanks to EOTT's tuition reimbursement program, I will be
completing my undergraduate degree this summer at UST (although I "walked"
two weeks ago).  My degree is in General Studies (concentrations in
Business Administration and International Studies).  I am graduating Summa
Cum Laudeand received the Outstanding Graduate award in my degree program,
along with honors in English, Philosophy and Adult Education.  I intend to
start the MBA program at UST in Spring 2002.

I would like to find a position within your organization where I can learn
the business, provide value to the company as well as advance myself.  I
mention that I am graduating with honors not to pat myself on the back but
to impress upon you that I will apply the same focus and desire for
excellence in any position I undertake.  Naturally, I would like to stay
within the Enron companies not only because I have 7 years invested
already, but because Enron is the place to work and grow.  I am open to any
position where there is an opportunity for learn, grow and advance.  As
with my studies, I find the more I become aware of and learn, the more I
want to learn.  I know I could do a great job within an organization given
the opportunity.

Any advice or assistance in finding a position or internship would be
greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Autumn R. Cartier
Executive Assistant
EOTT Energy Corp.
2000 W. Sam Houston Pkwy. S., Ste. 400
Houston, TX  77042-3611
(713) 993-5026 / BLP4453
(713) 402-2801 (fax)


About a month, ago you should have received an invitation to your FAP 2001
webCafe room(s) that contained log on information to access the room.  If you
have not received the email or are having difficulty logging into the
webCafe, please contact the Wharton webCafe Team be sending email to
webCafe@wharton.upenn.edu and we will be happy to assist you.

Best regards,

Michele Krull
WCIT webCafe Team
webCafe@wharton.upenn.edu
215-573-4262


Have thought of a way around this. - Find out as much as you can on why it happened and lets discuss.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	Expenses

I have never received any expense in my bank account, probably due to the difference in the names on the systems.  This is a huge issue and I need to know how much money is missing immediately and how this gets resolved.  I would think that we issued them in 'Kitchen' and therefore they were bounced by my account which is in 'Nettelton'.  I may be wrong if this is a common problem.

I may never have been paid any.  Please check all expenses going back all year.

This is a huge number which state they have been paid and have not hit my bank account.

Of the expenses showing up not cleared on my bank account I have received none of the payments which I think adds up as follows:

11/13/01	4,069:72	(cheque which bounced)
11/10/01	21,010:15	(never reached my account although showing paid)
11/10/01	3,319:40	(never reached my account although showing paid)

Plus I have a cheque for a prior expense which bounced which is for about $4000.

In pre- petition expenses this is clearly more than $5000.

In post petition - I also have expenses pending which will bounce if the name on the payee does not correspond to the account holder name.

Tammie - please work on this as our highest priority tomorrow.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Astramowicz, Jarek
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:59 AM
To:	Overfield, Adam; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

so be it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Overfield, Adam
Sent:	15 November 2001 17:58
To:	Astramowicz, Jarek; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

Jarek

We were having some retention problems with Jacek for a variety of reasons.  After discussion in London we decided to increase his package.

I believe it is highly unlikely that Jacek would be interested in working out of the Warsaw office for Enron Poland.

Adam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Astramowicz, Jarek
Sent:	15 November 2001 16:47
To:	Overfield, Adam; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

The package is significantly higher than what the industry peers would receive in this position and in this market. I wish we had a chance to discuss this issue internally first.

In case I were to retain him as part of Enron Poland at a later date - I can not justify this level of remuneration as part of my budget.

Jarek

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Overfield, Adam
Sent:	15 November 2001 17:41
To:	Astramowicz, Jarek; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

Jarek

I have discussed this with Jacek.  The reason for increasing Jacek's package is retention.

Adam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Astramowicz, Jarek
Sent:	15 November 2001 16:24
To:	Cattigan, Ed; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

Has this package been discussed with Jacek yet at all ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cattigan, Ed
Sent:	15 November 2001 16:56
To:	Overfield, Adam; Astramowicz, Jarek; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Resolution No 9

Hi

Attached is resolution 9 filled in with Jacek's remuneration for you perusal prior to the Board meeting.

regards

Ed

 << File: RESOLUTION NO 9.doc >>


Please what's the ststus?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 11:27
AM ---------------------------

Kevin G Moore
08/08/2000 11:08 AM
To: Darren P Adamik/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: T.V.

We are in need of a 9 inch t.v. set.
The set will be located betweenEB3240E and
EB3240F.

R.C. # 100038
Co.# 0011

Please if any more information is needed
please call me x34710.

Also please provide E.T.A.

                                 Thanks
                             Kevin Moore


I made two changes and tracked them.  I did not fill in the phone number, because I assumed Bill was to sign.

Keith

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:44 AM
To:	Martens, Donna; Petersen, Keith
Cc:	Miller, Mary Kay
Subject:	Transwestern Red Rock Expansion; Extension Request

Attached is a revised draft of the letter. The only change from the prior draft is to the volumes in the first sentence of the second paragraph. I've changed the contracted capacity figure from 120,000 Mcf to 106,700 per feedback from Keith. I think this is now ready to file, except that we will need to fill in the blanks. Please confirm this and give me a call at your convenience so that we can discuss the logistics of the filing. Thanks.


fyi.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hernandez, Elizabeth L.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:51 AM
To:	Lamadrid, Victor; Garcia, Clarissa; Smith, George F.
Cc:	Goodell, Scott; Germany, Chris; Farmer, Daren J.; South, Steven P.; Tholt, Jane M.; Reitmeyer, Jay; Pereira, Susan W.; Ring, Andrea; Kelly, Katherine L.; Ferries, Nelson; Barbe, Robin; Gillespie, Steve; Baumbach, David
Subject:	Deal Validation

Effective immediately Sean Riordan @X5-4298 will be responsible for Deal Validation issues.  He is taking over all my current duties as I will be moving to a new group.  I will be helping Sean with Deal Validation issues until 10/19/2001.

Please let your group know that they should now be calling Sean for assistance.


Dear UT Team:

Attached you will find the status of our candidates.  Cultivation is
CRITICAL, so please remember to contact your candidates.  Their deadline is
January 23.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

lexi
3-4585


Thanks Geoff.

-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Sent: Wed 3/14/2001 7:48 PM
To: Husain, Karima
Cc:
Subject:

<<tds.xls>>


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2001 10:01 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	01/02/2001 11:43 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Vernon

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001 11:43 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	11/30/2000 09:25 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Vernon

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 09:25 AM -----

	Elizabeth Sager
	10/30/2000 03:05 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Vernon

fyi
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 03:04 PM -----

	Christian Yoder
	10/30/2000 02:57 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Vernon

Here are the values of the Vernon transactions.  ----cgy
---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
12:46 PM ---------------------------
From: Kim Ward on 10/27/2000 04:09 PM
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Timothy Osting, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vernon

Christian,

As you requested, here are the current values of trades involving Vernon:

1)  $ value of killed 10 yr transaction = $13,300,000

2)  $ value of all other deals with Vernon = ($5,800,000)

3)  $ value of killed deal for 1st year = $1,300,000

Let me know if you have any questions or need additional information.

Thanks,

Kim Ward


Neither of the CPs listed below is authorized to trade US power because they
are not current trading partners and are not on the FERC lists:

LGS Natural Gas Company
The Coastal Corporation

Neither of the following CPS are authorized to trade US power products
because they are restricted by credit:

Trammo Gas
Teppco Crude Oil, LLC
Total Gas & Electric

Leslie


Hey Kim,

Please contact Megan Parker from now on for Citizens.  I will be helping transition this off to her, but most of the activity needs to be addressed with her.

Thanks!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:02 PM
To:	Saucier, Darla
Subject:

darla,

can you send me the invoice for the griffith stuff for July?  I think I need to make a change.

Thanks,

Kim


I took a call from a reporter this morning about pricing info for May 9 (the
reporter wants to make the point that the state overpaid for its contracts).
I got the following info from Bob Badeer:

May 9 -- prices at SP15 (location north of LA-south, but excluding LA) for
July forward -- flat price, 7/24
 5-year: $75/MWh
 10-year: $63

today (6/28):
 5-year: $42
 10-year: $41


With reference to the attached Memorandum from Katia D'Hulster, could you
please let us have your response as soon as possible.  The deadline for the
board memo assigning a person for this Committee was December 1st.

Many thanks
Christine Whitehead

 <<board members - european accounting and disclosure cttee.doc>>

 - board members - european accounting and disclosure cttee.doc


If anyone asks, I would prefer to have Gloria for our temp.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/07/2000 12:29 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: October Vacation

I have already requested October 23-26 off for vacation and would like to add
the 27th to make it a week off.  Brenda, would you please get a temp for my
desk for that entire week.  Thanks!


Ava,
Commencing with the August 15 pay period, please start coding 100% of Amy Milligan's time to work order E002494.03.  This is according to our payout for the Citizens/EAMR agreement.  Continue to use this methodology until further notice.

If you have any questions, please advise.

Thanks,
Donna


No, that's fine. But because of the new global standards, we're required to
produce and report all corrections made on west power deals each day. So I
was looking into these deals to get trader names, terms, etc., but 3 of them
wouldn't pull up. 507901, 506767, and 507900 don't seem to be in the system.
Are these the correct deal numbers? Let me know when you get a chance.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/30/2001 11:56 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Incorrect Counterparties

Thank you.  I think if I send these emails, they eventually pick the correct
CP.  I hope you don't mind that I changed the deals myself.

   Kate Symes                01/30/2001 11:22 AM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Incorrect Counterparties

Thank you for the reminder, Rhonda. I'm going to send out another
announcement this afternoon to all our traders along with the daily
correction log. Hopefully this will incite everyone to pay more attention to
the counterparty names they choose.

Thanks again,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/30/2001 09:14 AM
To: Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Geir Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT, Juan
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leaf Harasin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ryan
Slinger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David V Porter/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Incorrect Counterparties

I have changed the following deals b/c the selected CPs are incorrect.  Also,
please remember not to pick CPs in brackets as they are inactive.  Thank you
for your help.

507901 should be Allegheny Power, Transmission Business Unit
507842 should be Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.
506767 should be NRG Power Marketing, Inc.
507900 should be PJM Interconnection LLC
506618 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506727 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506747 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.


Please revise the natural gas nomination for the MTBE Plant for December 2000
as follows:

10,000 mmbtu for the first 15 days of the month
  2,000 mmbut for the last half of the month

---------------------- Forwarded by Maritta Mullet/GPGFIN/Enron on 11/27/2000
05:01 PM ---------------------------

Maritta Mullet
11/27/2000 04:44 PM
To: David Bush/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Mark Diedrich/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Steven M
Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Fox/ECF/Enron@ENRON,
David M Johnson/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Robert E Lee/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita
Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregg Lenart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Meers/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON,
Michael Mitcham/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L
Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kerry
Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Sally Shuler/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: NATURAL GAS NOMINATION FOR DECEMBER 2000

Enron Methanol nominates the following natural gas requirements for the
Methanol Plant for December 2000:

33,000 mmbtu per day

EGPFC nominates the following natural gas requirements for the MTBE Plant at
Morgan's Point for December 2000:

12,000 mmbtu per day for the first 15 days of the month.  None for the last
half of the month.  MTBE plant will be down after December 15.