-----Original Message-----
From: PennFuture [mailto:pennfuture@pennfuture.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Friends of PennFuture
Subject: PennFuture's E-Cubed - Straight to the Source

PennFuture's E-cubed is a commentary biweekly email publication concerning the current themes and trends in the energy market.
---------------------------------
September 26, 2001
Vol. 3, No. 18

Straight to the Source

Last year when PECO Energy and Unicom merged to form Exelon it was big news. Importantly, the merger settlement provided $32 million to fund the development of renewable energy in Pennsylvania.

This year, the company's wholesale trading and marketing unit, Power Team, presented renewable energy advocates with a big surprise - signing long-term contracts to purchase the output of three new wind farms in Pennsylvania. These contracts were not required as part of the merger settlement, and are not included in the $32 million earmarked for renewable energy funding.

Now a key force in renewable energy development in the East, the Power Team contracts are essential to bringing 78 MW of generation online from these new wind farms, two of which will be operational next month. The 15 MW Mill Run wind farm is scheduled to being operation next week, and the 9 MW Somerset wind farm is scheduled to begin commercial operation the following week.

Mike Freeman, the Power Team trader who made the burgeoning wind energy business in Pennsylvania possible, gave us some insight into Exelon's renewable energy commitment as well as how wind energy can be integrated into America's power grids.
---------------------------------
What's in Power Team's renewable portfolio?
We have 525 MW of hydro that is not pumped storage, 150 MW of wind, 100 MW of landfill methane, 35 MW of Municipal Solid Waste, 20 MW of wood waste, and 16 MW of scrap tires.

All of the wind is Green-e certifiable as "new" resources. All of the landfill methane is qualified under Green-e, but only 10 MW is new generation. Of the hydro, all of the generation is in larger projects that have been or are eligible for certification under the low-impact hydro standards. The MSW and tire projects are not qualified under Green-e, but the biomass plant is.

Why is Power Team developing a renewable portfolio?
There were two principal reasons: a perceived demand for renewable energy products in the wholesale marketplace, and a desire to diversify our portfolio from the perspectives of fuel, emissions, and cost.

Was there internal resistance or other issues to overcome?
I think the initial reaction was that renewable projects would be a very minor sidelight to our overall business. I don't think many people paid attention to the implications of renewable portfolio standards or external corporate mandates for renewable purchases. Part of the hands-off approach was due to, I believe, a sense that renewable products only meant the re-packaging of existing generation, not changing the power system in any way.

Over time I think many people got comfortable with the idea that the creation of products potentially could initiate new projects that would change the power system. For me that's the most important part of our participation - to help encourage new development. I also think that management began to get comfortable with the idea that renewable energy products could be profitable, and that demand for these products could be sustaining.

Will this encourage new development?
Generators get a creditworthy counter-party that is not only willing to buy all of the energy at the generator location, but is also willing to talk about additional new projects. Over time, other market intermediaries such as power marketers and retail suppliers may become interested in doing the same. If this chain of events occurs, I think we may even see renewable credits traded over the counter, just like other energy products now.

How do renewables fit into Power Team's overall business strategy?
We are a growth company and are constantly in search of ways to sensibly increase our overall generating portfolio. So bringing on new renewable generation into our supply mix really is part of that overall strategy. More specifically, we believe there is sustainable demand for renewable energy, not only because of mandates such as renewable portfolio standards, but also because of natural demand. The average person may not think of it this way, but in supporting the idea of paying a premium for renewable energy I think that people implicitly are accepting the notion that renewable energy is an essential component of how we as a country intend to manage our future energy requirements.

Why Wind?
There's no question that the momentum for wind projects began to build as a result of the PECO restructuring and merger settlements, under which PECO provided funds for new wind projects. A second reason is that the forward electric markets began a steep upward climb beginning in 1998, and especially the off-peak power market beginning in 2000 and continuing into this year. A third reason was the rapid increase in electric demand in the last five years, and a realization that we need to develop a wide-ranging set of answers to meeting the demand, including supply-side and demand-side solutions. We felt that wind generation could play a role on the supply side while meeting what seems to be a growing demand for renewable sources.

What are the primary financial considerations for a wind deal?
The first is probably the need for a long-term contract. Wind generators typically want to enter into fixed-price, long-term agreements to make it easier and cheaper to borrow money and to provide a stable revenue source over a long period. We don't have a problem with long-term deals per se, although we do want to emphasize diversity in our contracting as well. We don't want to hold multiple long-term agreements and nothing else.

In my discussions with generators so far, there has been some flexibility on contract length. In fact, our willingness to enter into a long-term contract is perhaps the key ingredient to getting a wind project financed and built. Beyond the long-term contract, the wind developers want to do business with a creditworthy company that has an investment-grade rating. Exelon Generation is rated A- by S&P so we are a natural counter-party for project financing. Right now, there are not very many long term buyers out there with the kind of credit-worthiness that we have.

Will that always will be the case?
No. If we're right about long-lasting demand, I think other large companies, including distribution companies, will participate in the purchase of energy from these projects. We've teamed up with a retail marketer, Community Energy, to stimulate demand and market wind energy in ways that will move companies to buy it. In the development of conventional generation, it is not always necessary to enter into 20-year agreements for a project to get built. For example, a developer may want to hedge off a portion of the output on a long-term basis but will be willing to sell the rest of the output for shorter periods. And in some cases, the financing source may be comfortable with a shorter-term agreement for the whole thing.

Is there a financial advantage for wind?
If one's view is that the future value of energy is higher than the present value, a generation source with no fuel risk obviously is good to have. Wind has one key advantage over other resources - perpetual availability without any fuel costs or price volatility. This helps mitigate the other risks that wind does present.

It is of course difficult to predict what will happen even in the near term. But I am a believer in broad trends or cycles that are relatively easier to project, outside of significant advances in technology. Over a long period of time, 15 or 20 years, I think the probability of fixed-price wind energy riding out the low cycles while providing a greater amount of benefits in the high cycles is higher than the opposite.

I do believe that the demand for wind generation will be sustained at a moderate premium over generic electricity prices for the next 15 to 20 years.

Is it difficult to integrate wind into your portfolio?
With conventional generation and firm transmission paths, a power marketing entity such as Power Team can bring its resources to the highest markets, whether they are hourly, daily, monthly, or longer. Such transactions are supported by a complex communications network that notifies transmission providers of the timing, amount and ultimate sink of expected output.

The contracts that we enter into on conventional generators depend to a great extent on economic structures that ensure as much as possible that the generator will fulfill our dispatch schedule as close to 100% of the time as possible, so we can avoid the punitive imbalance fees that transmission providers impose when delivered energy doesn't match scheduled energy. The approach we take on wind generation must be quite different, because wind plants provide intermittent output that is difficult to predict within reasonable boundaries of accuracy.

I think the serious wind developers know we are serious about incorporating wind energy into our portfolio. We're one of the biggest physical movers of power in the country and have a significant amount of assets - that must count for something in terms of our ability to more easily integrate a 50 MW wind project into our overall mix.

How does intermittent generation add complexity?
A wind farm generates electricity when the wind blows, not when you flip the switch on. It takes a lot more than I expected to accommodate intermittency, even for an experienced organization like ours, because the transmission system and the operational rules and procedures were not developed with wind generation in mind. You don't have the ability to give transmission providers real-time information for purposes of regulating the system between supply and demand.

In PJM, where generators can offer increments of generation on a day-ahead or real-time basis, and receive (or pay) market-clearing prices depending on actual generation, wind energy can be offered into the system in one of several different ways without experiencing significant imbalance penalties. An obstacle, and we're working with PJM on this right now, is that PJM as the transmission provider typically requires no shorter than 20-minute notice when self-scheduled or must-run generators expect to produce electricity or expect to stop producing electricity. For purposes of regulating the system, PJM then has the ability to tell the self-scheduled generator to go ahead and generate, or to hold off until the energy is needed as a result of the real-time balance of supply and demand.

This will not be practical with wind generation. We'd literally have to assign a trader to the task of monitoring highly suspect expected output from our wind plants and then calling PJM every hour to determine what to do. In the must-run scenario, we'd still have to notify PJM of expected output so PJM can regulate the system with other generators. Either way, we'd have to predict output, which is a dicey
proposition.

Does that make wind generation unreliable?
Not at all. We've got excellent modeling to predict the output from wind generation over a longer period of time, such as a full year. Those predictions underlie our contracts. But it's another thing to tell the wind when to blow. The wind energy industry is working on this from the perspective of improved wind forecasting and a more automated approach than what I've described. In PJM, a 54,000 MW system, this may not seem to be a problem when there is only about 25 MW of wind generation in the system right now, but PJM wants to institute market rules that will be appropriate for a larger amount of wind generation when it arrives. A certain magnitude of wind generation will cause PJM to change the way it now regulates the system.

The complexity cannot be underestimated and we will be part of the solution.

How can scheduling and other rules  better accommodate intermittent resources like wind?
An alternative is for the transmission provider to model the output from a wind plant as "negative" load instead of generation. Which is to say, when the plant is generating electricity, the system load will be reduced by the amount the plant is generating. When the plant is not generating, the load will increase. A tradeoff of that approach is that load typically pays ancillary services expenses such as regulation and spinning reserve. In this unique circumstance, which of the ancillary services apply to negative load, and at what level? We're working with PJM on these questions.

I'm uncertain whether a significant amount of so-called negative load will require any kind of real-time notice to the transmission provider. Of course the transmission systems are operated to react to the unpredictability of load, and one can view the unpredictability of wind generation in the same way. Other countries, and the western U.S. transmission systems, have figured out how to handle large amounts of wind generation, and so can we.

Are you working on other approaches?
Another possibility is to dynamically schedule the output from a wind plant that is situated in a control area without a real-time energy market, to a control area that does have such a market. The output signal from the plant would be available to the transmission provider in the second control area on an automated basis.  The output then becomes part of available supply from moment to moment. However, notice requirements would not be sidestepped with this approach.

Will PJM resolve these problems?
Yes. PJM is progressive and innovative, and has indicated to us that they are willing to work with us to find solutions to the scheduling/imbalance issue. It's hard now because we're breaking new ground. I expect that it will be much easier for the next projects developed.

How big might your renewable portfolio get? Will you keep signing more contracts for new projects?
As long as we continue to see demand for renewable energy, we'll continue to look at projects where there are energy markets whose long-term forward economics support the purchase of energy. I'd like to aggregate a significant amount of wind generation in a single market, such as PJM, to be able to provide PJM with a more diversified supply curve - with multiple projects it may be possible to smooth the output.

We need to do business with companies that have the financing and the organizational will to get these projects completed. We are looking to form relationships with companies that we can build on. If we execute a contract successfully, we'd like to apply the same concepts to additional projects with the same company. Examples of that are Atlantic Renewable Energy Corp. and National Wind Power.

What are some key developments to make the industry grow faster?
We need technological efficiencies to drive down the cost of the equipment, standardized approaches to the transmission of wind generation, financial innovations to allow more risk-sharing, and hybrid approaches such as wind and energy storage.

Perhaps most importantly, we need consumers to buy the wind energy!

---------------------------------
E-cubed is available for reprint in newspapers and other publications. Authors are available for print or broadcast.

PennFuture (www.pennfuture.org), with offices in Harrisburg, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, is a statewide public interest membership organization, which advances policies to protect and improve the state's environment and economy. PennFuture's activities include litigating cases before regulatory bodies and in local, state and federal courts, advocating and advancing legislative action on a state and federal level, public education and assisting citizens in public advocacy.

To unsubscribe, simply reply to this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject.


Please plan to attend the following meeting with Eric Moon:

Subject:		EDFI
Date:			Thursday, September 27, 2001
Time:			3:00 - 3:30
Location:		EB 32C2


$2.8 million.

Herman Manis
12/11/2000 10:53 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: ENA / Coral Turbine Transaction

What is the current gain estimate on this deal?

Kay Mann
12/11/2000 10:37 AM
To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger
Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew F
Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA / Coral Turbine Transaction

Hot of the press.  This should be very close to the last version.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:36
AM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 12/11/2000 09:53:03 AM
To: "'gkutzschbach@fulbright.com'" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com>,
"'areynaud@coral-energy.com'" <areynaud@coral-energy.com>,
"'dwhaley@coral-energy.com'" <dwhaley@coral-energy.com>,
"'TSeigler@coral-energy.com'" <TSeigler@coral-energy.com>
cc: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>,
"'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: ENA / Coral Turbine Transaction

 <<2R6LRED.DOC>>  <<2RM3RED.DOC>>  <<2RLSRED.DOC>>  <<2R6KRED.DOC>>

We have enclosed the following documents for your review:

 1. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Letter Agreement for
CA Energy Development I, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from the draft
circulated by King & Spalding on 12-09-2000;

 2. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Letter Agreement for
CA Energy Development II, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from the draft
circulated by King & Spalding on 12-09-2000;

 3. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Letter Agreement for
CA Energy Development II, LLC pertaining to the transformer, marked to
reflect revisions from the draft circulated by King & Spalding on
12-09-2000; and

 4. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Liability Company
Agreement of CA Energy Development I, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from
the draft circulated by King & Spalding on 12-09-2000.

We still need confirmation of the name of the last director for the LLC and
the date for exercising the call/put option in Section 6.2 of the LLC
Agreement.  Please advise at your earliest convenience.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King &  Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 128541vR13/12
  129099v4/3
  129088v5/4
  128540v9/8

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2R6LRED.DOC
 - 2RM3RED.DOC
 - 2RLSRED.DOC
 - 2R6KRED.DOC


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Buy, Rick
Sent:	Tuesday, March 27, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Murphy, Ted; Port, David; Carson, Rick L.
Subject:	FW: Message from Pug Winokur

fyi- we need to discuss, rick
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Beth Grizzle" <bgrizzle@capricornholdings.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Beth+20Grizzle+22+20+3Cbgrizzle+40capricornholdings+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, March 27, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Fastow, Andrew S.; Buy, Rick; rcausey@enron.com
Subject:	Message from Pug Winokur

Gentlemen:

	Bob and I would like to schedule a joint session of the Audit and Finance
Committees, perhaps at the August meeting, to cover the following topics
(and any others which occur to you):

1.	how and why are the trading and investment policies (and levels specified
therein) established;

2.	how and why are the VAR and maximum expected loss limits set;

3.	how useful is the VAR methodology as it is extended outside of the
wholesale gas and electricity business.

	It would also be useful to update the Committees on the post-audits of
recent investments and perhaps on the larger "asset" investments such as
Dabhol, Electrol, Cuiaba, etc.  Even as we move away from these investments,
there may be some additional lessons to be learned.  Does our post-audit
process and procedure continue?

	We could meet briefly in May to discuss the idea of a joint meeting and the
proposed agenda, if that is convenient.

	Best regards.

Herbert S. Winokur, Jr.
Capricorn Management, G.P.
203-861-6600
203-861-6671 (fax)


Steve - We were hoping to provide a chart that plotted out the NOx emissions
from existing fossil fuel generation vs, new cleaner generation.  This chart
is not quite there.  However, it is a rough aggregate of the NOx generated by
all of the existing fossil fuel generation over 50 MW in CA.  The data points
were gathered from the EPA's Acid Rain CEMs (continuous emissions monitoring)
database.  (I am working on a chart that's message is more clear.) As you
will see, existing generation is significantly dirtier than what new,
combined cycle plants would be.  In fact, of the utility units in CA
reporting under Title IV, there are a number of steam plants with NOx
emissions of 0.1 lb/MMBtu or in some cases more.  This corresponds to about 1
lb NOx/MWh compared to 0.056 lb/MWh for a new gas combined cycle plant.  Even
the cleaner boilers that are at 0.05 lb/MMBtu are 10 times higher than the
new plants on an output basis.

In otherwords, Dave Parquet is right that there is a lot of more polluting
generation on line, while new plants have to meet ever tighter BACT
requirements.

In the most recent version of SB 28 it looks like there are a lot of
provisions focusing on the retrofitting of existing generation.  I suspect,
the regulators are well aware of the discrepancies in emissions and would
argue that the plants are going to have to clean up in the very near future.
I am digging for more information on these timelines.

Gus, Marc, and I felt like the main short term fixes/solutions would be:

1.  Expanding the hours of operations for back-up generators.  (As I have
previously stated, some of the local air districts have increased the
permitted run hours for emergency generators from 200 to 500 at only
"essential public services.")

2.  CA requiring offsetting of emissions at only the ratios required by
Federal regulations.  In many cases state requirements are more stringent.

3.  The EPA allowing the concept of the pollution mitigation bank - it is
really going to be an issue of timing - once the CA government has the funds
to start acquiring offsets they will be able to provide them prior to the
operation of a new generation facility, However, there is going to be some
initial lag time where the offsets aren't in the hands of the generation
operators (which goes against the requirements of the Clean Air Act).

4.  The Feds working with the state and local permitters to create alternate
sources of emission offsets.  There simply aren't enough in all the air
districts.  As I stated, in my previous memo the USEPA has allowed, under the
NOx SIP call, emissions allowances to be given to renewable and energy
efficiency projects. CA is going to need guidance from the USEPA in how to
create and count alternate sources of offsets in nonattainment areas.

5.  The USEPA better defining the nonattainment air sheds and pollution
transportation pathways.  Apparently, there is not a central model of the air
patterns in CA.  Thus, the 35 local air districts all having different
requirements about inter-district offsets.

However, the real issues as Dave alluded to in his memo are going to require
modifications to the Clean Air Act.  It is pretty prescriptive about what can
and can't be done, and there is not a whole lot of flexibility.

Let me know if anything in here is not clear.  I'm working on refining the
data and presentation of the data.

Mary Schoen
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-345-7422


Hello Steven,

I apologize, I combined two different presentations. Attached are the slides
for the CEO
Executive Presentation tomorrow from Margaret Carson.

Thank You
Katrina Burton
ext. 5--4498


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
02:04 PM ---------------------------

Shijie Deng <deng@isye.gatech.edu> on 09/29/2000 09:17:39 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: INFORMS National conference at San Antonio

Vince,

Could you please send me the title and a 50-word abstract of your
presentation by the end of today?  I'd like to forward them to the
organizer as soon as possible so that we could make it into the printed
conference program.  Thanks.

Shijie

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

>
> Shijie,
>
> I would be interested in attending and giving a presentation.
>
> This would be also a good opportunity for both of us to meet
> and discuss the plans for closer cooperation.
>
> Vince
>
>
> Shijie Deng <deng@isye.gatech.edu> on 09/25/2000 01:20:59 AM
>
> To:   Vince Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> cc:   Shijie Deng <deng@isye.gatech.edu>
> Subject:  INFORMS National conference at San Antonio
>
>
>
> Hi Vince,
>
> I'll be organizing a session at the INFORMS national meeting in San
> Antonio (Nov 5-8, 2000, http://www.informs.org/Conf/SanAntonio2000) on
> modeling price volatility in electricity markets or financial engineering
> approaches.  I'm just wondering if you or some member of your research
> group would be interested in giving a presentation there.  Please let me
> know.  Thanks.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Shijie
>
> Shi-Jie Deng
> Assistant Professor
> School of ISyE
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> Office Phone: (404) 894-6519
> E-mail:       deng@isye.gatech.edu
> Home page:    http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~deng
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Hey G,

	Haven't heard from you, what's going on?  Things are same 'ol here
at work, am going on vacation to San Antonio next week.  Hey, I'm going to
be in Austin tomorrow for work and am planning to play golf in the
afternoon.  I plan to play at a course that is towards Houston on 290, and
since George works out there somewhere, I thought he might be able to join
in.  Do you have his email and/or phone numbers (work/home)?

	Have you been playing any golf?  We got a new analyst here at work
from UT and he's got got fever.  He got me to play last Friday (my first
time in Houston!) and now I've got the fever again.  My wife is not
thrilled, but.................  So if you play at all, we should hook up.

	Thanks,
	E

	Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
	03/26/2001 10:14 AM
	To:	Ernie J Zavaleta/Frito-Lay/US@Frito-Lay
	cc:
	Subject:	Re: Any Plans tonight?

	Hey Ernie!  Sorry I didn't get back with you Friday.  I left a
little
	early, so I must have just missed your message.  Did you guys have a
good
	time on Friday night?  How is everything going?

	It has actually been thick around here.  Worked several late nights
last
	week to try and get caught up.  I may have to delay the purchase of
the new
	car with Enron's stock taking a hit lately.  It did gain some points
on
	Friday and early today.  Hopefully it keeps it up.

	Talked to George since his wedding?  Haven't heard anything out of
him
	since.  Probably just overcome by marital bliss.

	                    "Zavaleta, Ernie"

	                    <Ernie.J.Zavaleta@fri        To:
Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
	                    tolay.com>                   cc:

	                                                 Subject:     Any
Plans tonight?
	                    03/23/2001 03:18 PM

	     Hey, what's going on?  My brother-in-law and a friend of his
are
	flying into town tonight?  We're going to head over to Gilians
(sp?), a
	place that is supposed to be like Dave & Buster's.  We'll prob get
there at
	about 10:00.  We thought we'd hang there for a while and then head
to the
	downtown area and find dome kind of bar.  A couple of other friends
of mine
	from  B-school will be joining us, I thought you might want to as
well.
	Are
	you game?

	     Write back or give me a call H: 281-251-6398, cell:
281-687-6893.
	I'm leaving work in a few minutes if I don't respond to any email.

	     later,
	     E

	     Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
	     02/26/2001 01:39 PM
	     To:  Ernie J Zavaleta/Frito-Lay/US@Frito-Lay
	     cc:
	     Subject:  Re: 2nd Hotel Room Confirmation

	     Ernie,  Thanks for taking care of that.   I will probably be
getting
	into
	     Austin earlier than you.  I'll have my cell phone with me.
(281)
	772-9250.
	     If you get into town earlier, give me a call.  Otherwise why
don't
	you just
	     call me at the room when you get to the hotel.   Sounds great,
we'll
	ride
	     over together.  I might bring this girl I have kinda been
seeing
	with me.
	     My latest victim.  We'll see.    I believe that's correct.  The
	wedding is
	     at 7.

	     Thanks for the Dilliards tip.  I was going to ask about that.

	     G

	                         Ernie.J.Zavaleta@fr

	                         itolay.com                 To:
	gerald.nemec@enron.com
	                                                    cc:

	                         02/26/2001 12:09 PM        Subject:     2nd
	Hotel Room Confirmation

	     Gerald,

	     Good news - we were able to get the second room at the same
$129
	rate.
	     Below
	     you'll see two separate confirmation numbers - I don't think it
	matters
	     which
	     one you or I use.  When you check in, just claim one of them.
	They're both
	     on
	     my card so you can transfer to yours at check-in.

	     I'm not sure what time we'll get there since we'll be coming
from
	SA.  I
	     estimate we'll get there at about 5:00 (the wedding is at 7:00
	right?)
	     We'll
	     actually be traveling to SA on Friday since some of Jill's
family
	from the
	     Valley will be there as well.

	     If we're not in contact before then, let's just plan on meeting
at
	the
	     hotel
	     sometime between 6:00 and 6:30.  We can drive over to the
wedding
	together
	     from
	     there.

	     In case you didn't know, they're registered at Dillard's - we
got
	him a
	     gift
	     yesterday, still plenty of items on the list.

	     E
	     ---------------------- Forwarded by Ernie J
Zavaleta/Frito-Lay/US on
	     02/26/2001
	     12:03 PM ---------------------------

	     Suzanne Mercer <suzannemercer@tramex.com>
	     02/26/2001 11:58 AM

	     To:   Ernie J Zavaleta/Frito-Lay/US@Frito-Lay
	     cc:
	     Subject:  2nd Hotel Room Confirmation

	      TO: FRITO LAY / PEPSI
	                 ERNIE ZAVALETA
	                 100 GLENBOROUGH DT
	                 SUITE 1200
	                 HOUSTON TX 77067

	      FOR: ZAVALETA/ERNIE          REF: FRIT-0046000

	      HOTEL
	      03MAR   AUSTIN            MARRIOTT HOTELS
	       SAT                      MARRIOTT AUSTIN CAPITAL
	                                701 EAST 11TH STREET
	                                AUSTIN TX 78701
	                                FONE 512-478-1111
	                                FAX  512-478-3700
	                                1 NIGHT       1 ROOM       OUT-04MAR
	                                LEISURE RATE
	                                RATE-129.00USD PER NIGHT
	                                CANCEL BY 06P DAY OF ARRIVAL
	                                GUARANTEED LATE ARRIVAL
	                                CONFIRMATION 82747164
	                                RQST KING BED NON SMOKING
	      HOTEL
	              AUSTIN            MARRIOTT HOTELS
	                                MARRIOTT AUSTIN CAPITAL
	                                701 EAST 11TH STREET
	                                AUSTIN TX 78701
	                                FONE 512-478-1111
	                                FAX  512-478-3700
	                                1 NIGHT       1 ROOM       OUT-04MAR
	                                LEISURE RATE
	                                RATE-129.00USD PER NIGHT
	                                CANCEL BY 06P DAY OF ARRIVAL
	                                GUARANTEED LATE ARRIVAL
	                                CONFIRMATION 82413250
	                                RQT NONSMOKING

	      .
	      ---------------------  IMPORTANT ----------------------
	        AIRLINE SECURITY REQUEST A 60 MINUTES FOR CHECK-IN.
	        GOVERNMENT ISSUED PHOTO ID IS REQUIRED BY AIRLINE.
	      -------------------------------------------------------
	      ----------------- ITINERARY COMMENTS ------------------
	      AIRFARES ARE PER PERSON AND SUBJ. TO CHANGE UNTIL TKT/D
	         PLEASE REVIEW ITINERARY IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT
	      IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, CONTACT THE LEISURE TRAVEL
	      DEPARTMENT BY EMAIL OR PHONE --
	      972-334-5055 OR 800-776-8009, MON-FRI 8A-5P CST, OR
	      CONTACT YOUR AIRLINE DIRECT FOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE.
	      -------------------------------------------------------


I left Kent a message, suggesting that we start with COA, telling him ENA is
the assignee.  I'll let you know when I hear from him.

Kay

From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 11/16/2000 11:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Break contracts/Priority setting

Just as we discussed.  Thanks


he went home already.  we went to dinner mon & tues.  i am just going to
chill this week and party on saturday, maybe even friday a little.  are you
going out tomorrow?


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 05:12 PM -----

	Melissa Ann Murphy
	04/25/2001 05:08 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Example

Hello, I noticed on this example that Kim Hundl forgot to specify if the law
was New York or Texas (the confirm still has both in brackets).  I will have
her re-do the confirm.

Thanks,
Melissa


Attached is a redlined version of the agreement with the revisions.  Some
revisions beyond  those we discussed with BR were made strictly to clear up
inconsistencies in the original document.  Please review and let me know if
you have any questions.  I plan on being at the Member Meeting in Denver next
week, but please call any time prior if you wish to discuss.  (713) 853-3512.
I will be forwarding the LLC and Administrative Agreement with revisions
tomorrow.  The revisions to these docs are slight and only made to reflect
the be consistent with the substantive changes in the Capacity Allocation and
Expansion Determination Agreement.


Our nomination into Eastrans will drop to 60,000 MMBtu/d for 3/21/2000 only.
On 3/22/2000, it will increase to 75,000 MMBtu/d aqnd remain there until
further
notice.

For 3/21/2000 only,
50,000 redelivered via PG & E
7,000 from FCV
3,000 into your cartwheel agrment at Carthage
0 into Mobil Beaumont.

For 3/22 and following, same redeliveries as above,
except add 15,000 into Mobil Beaumont.


Greetings everyone.  I just wanted to thank all of you for coming to the
housewarming party.  It meant a lot that so many of you came from far away
(Seattle and Grants Pass) for me, and helped me welcome in my new home.  I
also wanted to thank those of you were so kind and treated me to present.  I
didn't expect that, but fully loved it.  Thanks again for making it so much
fun.

Oh---I will probably be single by this weekend, so I am thinking we should
party on cinco de Mayo. I am giving Bart the boot. Let me know if something
fun is going on.  Talk to you all soon.

Luvins,
Elizah


Tana,

I would appreciate it if you could facilitate this document through the
required processes.  lelsie just needs to review the changes that London made
and email her acceptance of the changes to Denis O'Connell in London

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 16/11/2000 16:08
---------------------------

Richard Sage
15/11/2000 13:09
To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: i2 MOU

Leslie,
Craig Chaney tells me that you have been looking at these documents.
They need to be signed in the UK for tax reasons.
Can you therefore send confirmation to Denis that you are happy with them so
he can initial them and I will then get them signed.

Many thanks,
Richard

The only changes I have made here are:

Announcements
Any announcement made related to this agreement must be approved in advance
in writing by both parties.

Information Sharing
? Given authorization from the individual marketplace participant, i2 may at
a minimum provide the following information for all individual marketplace
participants that view EnronCredit.com information:
d First and last name
d Company name
d Job title
d Email address
d Business address
- Telephone number


Sam,

Let's go for Giuseppe amd Sean first.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           08/11/2000 01:31 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Monday's Newsletter

Yes.  We have Youyi.  Also, I noticed Hector, Giuseppe, and Sean?  Are they
going to be with us awhile?

Sam

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
08/11/2000 01:16 PM
To: William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Monday's Newsletter

Sam,

Do we have a new person to cover?

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           08/11/2000 10:20 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Monday's Newsletter

Good morning, Vince!

Would you mind doing a Kaminski Column for Monday?  If you'd rather not, I
can probably get a "new person" piece by then.  Also, will Maureen have Part
2 ready for this coming week?  I hesitate to ask her myself, because I think
it is a sore subject now.

Sincerely,

Sam


[IMAGE]
Rich media content loading in progress. If nothing appears after 15 seconds,
click here.
 [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]


Biliana,

I have prior commitments on Saturday, February the 5th. Please, send me more
information about the following Saturday. There is a remote possibility I
shall have
to go to London that weekend. Otherwise, I shall be glad to join you.

Vince

Biliana Pehlivanova <pehlivanova@sugar-land.oilfield.slb.com> on 01/28/2000
11:54:58 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: AIESEC

Dear Mr. Kaminski,

The following are the  personal and work e-mail addresses of the Polish
trainees in College Station.

Sylwester Rutkowski  sylwesterr@usa.net, sylwester.rutkowski@destia.com
Patricia Dalecka  pdalecka@hotmail.com, patrycia.dalecka@destia.com
Danusia Mas   danusia.mas@destia.com
Lidia Olczyk   lolczyk@usa.net, lidia.olczyk@destia.com
Robert Lyczak   rlyczak@yahoo.com, robert.lyczak@destia.com

I would like to invite you to join us for a paintball game next Saturday,
Feb 5th. The purpose of this event is to develop team building among our
student members, Board of Advisors, and corporate clients.

In addition, I would like to invite you to participate in our Mock
Sales day on Saturday, Feb. 12th.  During this day, the new members will
first receive training on AIESEC sales/knowledge and then role play with our
Board of Advisors and alumni acting as company
representatives. Sharing your AIESEC and work experience would be a
valuable contribution to our training program.

I will get in touch with you regarding these events in the beginning of
next week, as soon as I have the time and place finalized.

I appreciate your interest in working with us.

Best regards,

Biliana Pehlivanova
Vice President of Incoming Exchange
AIESEC Houston


Start Date: 1/22/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 10/25/2000
10:56 AM ---------------------------

"Heather Hill" <hhill@houston.rr.com> on 10/24/2000 08:14:35 AM
To: <mike.carson@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Fw: Pictures!

Our little bundle of joy!  He said to tell you that he misses you and can't
wait for you to get home and change his dirty diaper!  I'll save it for you.

Hugs and Kisses,
Me
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nanette Ramsey" <nanette_ramsey@hotmail.com>
To: <hhill@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 2:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Pictures!

> Hi kids!  Here are some of the pictures I took on "the night".  Hope you
> three are doing well.  Love you!
>
>
> >From: "Jan Klinger" <jklinger73@hotmail.com>
> >To: nanette_ramsey@hotmail.com, jklinger73@hotmail.com
> >Subject: Pictures!
> >Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:10:43 GMT
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>

 - Dcp00850.jpg
 - Dcp00852.jpg
 - Dcp00853.jpg


Notice No. 01-146
May 16, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX Division Members/Member Firms
All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
All NYMEX Division Floor Traders
All NYMEX Division Operations Managers

FROM:
George Henderson, Vice President

RE:
Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the Trading
Floor and Clearing Members
________________________________________________________________

The expiration date for the June 2001 options contract for Platinum (POM1) is
Wednesday, May 16, 2001.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized
representative present at their normal work station promptly at 5:30 p.m.
until released by the Exchange staff as specified below.  All adjustments
and/or corrections, must be accompanied by relevant supporting documentation
prior to being incorporated into expiration processing, in essence making the
expiration processing an extension of the afternoon trade resolution
procedures.  All input to the NYMEX Clearing Department will conclude no
later than 30 minutes after floor representatives are released.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110), Floor Trade Correction (299-2068 and 299-2169)
personnel, as well as a representative of the Floor Committee will be
available to assist with the processing of notices of Exercise and
Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other questions or
problems you may have.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The Option Expiration process is a screen based process for which all
information is provided on the screens on C21 terminals. No Option Expiration
Reports will be provided. The following screens will assist you through the
Option Expiration process:

MEMBER TRADE INQUIRY
Contains real-time top day trade information, trade information for the
previous 4 business days and trades adjusted for the previous 4 business days
by adjustment date.

SINGLE POSITION MAINTENANCE
Contains a real-time snapshot for each option series from the start of day
position to the projected end of day position.

REVIEW ACCEPT REJECT TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfers "TO" your firm and the status of
each transfer.

REVIEW SUBMITTED TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfer "FROM" your firm and the status of
each transfer.

EXERCISE NOTICE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to exercise.

DO NOT EXERCISE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to abandon.

POSITION CHANGE SUBMISSION
PCS may be submitted either by manual input or by electronic transmission.
Any PCS input on a Clearing 21 terminal will be the input processed by the
system.  This input may be made at any time prior to 6:45 p.m.  Any PCS input
via transmission for that contract series will be disregarded.

ALL POSITIONS ARE DEEMED FINAL
Upon completion of all PCS input, all positions will be deemed final.

EXERCISE/ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Will be available to you on the Single Position Maintenance window by
contract series or the Assignment List window which contains all your
Assignments on one window. You will be notified of its availability by C21
E-Mail and by Fast Facts. This should occur within 1 hour of the last PCS
input.

All Clearing Members are required to have an authorized representative(s) at
their C21 workstations in preparation for any communication during the
expiration process.

FAST FACTS
Clearing Members should call the Fast Facts information service 301-4871,
access code 700 for event messages advising Members of the event status.

E-MAIL
Clearing Members should read their C21 E-Mail messages immediately to be
aware of event status.

The standard event Fast Facts and/or E-Mail messages and the sequence in
which they will be announced are:

Standard Event Message: Announce Out-of-the Money Exercise and In-the-Money
Do Not Exercise Submissions
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 5:45 PM
Usual Event Time: 5:45 PM
Announced via Fast Facts

Standard Event Message: Announce Final Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 6:30 PM
Usual Event Time: 6:45 PM
Announced via e-mail

Standard Event Message: All positions are deemed final
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 7:30 PM
Usual Event Time: 6:45 PM
Announced via Fast Facts

Standard Event Message: Announce Exercise/Assignment Information Available on
the Single Position Maintenance Windows
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 8:25 PM
Usual Event Time: 8:30 PM
Announced via Fast Facts and e-mail

Standard Event Message: All Report Distribution is completed
Approximate Time of Message Availability: 11:00 PM
Usual Event Time: 11:00 PM
Announced via Fast Facts

The times appearing in the Usual Event Time column are based on normal
operational conditions and could vary.

NYMEX EXPIRATION DAY PROCESSING OVERVIEW OF MEMBER REQUIREMENTS

Time: 5:30 PM
Activity: Exercise Notice Submission
Event: Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Reference Number: 1

Time: 5:30 PM
Activity: Do Not Exercise Submission
Event: Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Reference Number: 2

Time: 5:45 PM
Activity: Announce Out-of-the-Money Exercise and In-the-Money Do Not Exercise
Submissions
Event: Fast Facts Notice
Reference Number: 3

Time: 6:30 PM
Activity: Announce Final Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Event: C21 E-mail
Reference Number: 4

Time: 6:45 PM
Activity: Final Input to C21 Cutoff Time
Reference Number: 5

Time: 7:30 PM
Activity: All Positions are Deemed Final
Event: Fast Facts Notice
Reference Number: 6

Time: 8:25 PM
Activity: Announce Exercise/Assignment Information Available on the Single
Position Maintenance Windows
Event: Fast Facts Notice and C21 E-mail
Reference Number: 7

If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact Charles
V. Bebel at 299-2130, Angel Rivera at 299-2150 or Anthony Di Benedetto at
299-2152 prior to the expiration date.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-146)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Susan,

I tried to explain the pricing formula in non-technical format.
Take a look the doc attached below, to see if this is good
enough for the lawyers.

Zimin

Resent:


Outlined below is a summer supply deal with North Shore Gas:

Buyer:  North Shore Gas Company
Seller:  ENA
Location:  NGPL Amarillo Mainline Pool
Volume:  2,028 MMBtu/day
Term:  August, September 2000
Price:  IFGMR FOM NGPL Midcontinent Index Plus $0.04/MMBtu

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Cary


Fran,

I am not sure that I ever had an executed document on the loans.  By copy of
this email, I am asking Twanda to send you what she has that has been signed
by Dosier.  I will let you fight the payment battles!

Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 10:42 AM -----

	Fran L Mayes
	06/20/2000 06:39 PM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Wade Dosier

Michelle, I do not have a copy of the executed document.   Can you provide me
with the amount due so that I can issue instructions - is this through A/P or
payroll (with taxes withheld).

Fran

---------------------- Forwarded by Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000 04:39
PM ---------------------------
From: Marla Barnard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 06/20/2000 02:24 PM
To: Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wade Dosier

Hi Fran,

Wade Dosier is now in EBS and informed me that he has a forgiveable loan from
ENA.  He asked me to make sure that the funds were being processed and that
they were being paid by ENA.  Can you please confirm?  thanks


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/18/2001>, published as of 10/18/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


The contact name is Jack Wells, and his phone number is (281) 293-6030. Would
you like me to enter this info into the deals?

Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
01/29/2001 08:23 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: conoco deals #506549.01, 506550.01, 506551.01

hi kate,
these sean crandall deals need contacts.  can you please get a good contact
name (and phone #) and i will put in a gcp request to have it added to the
drop down list in deal entry.
i'm too lazy to press the shift key lately, sorry -no caps.
thanks for your help!
kim


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/20/2000
04:00 PM ---------------------------

John J Lavorato
07/20/2000 03:43 PM
To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin
Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: N.A. Systems

I thought I would try to summarize our meeting this week and document a list
of agreed apon tasks.

1.  The Unify system is on the brink of disaster and everyone agrees that we
have huge business risk if it blows up.

 -->  Sally and Beth are going to document the steps we are taking to
maintain the system and minimize the chances of a failure.
        (everyone understands that this is a difficult task but it sounds
like it should be a high priority)

2.  The database to run the gas books takes way too long and is leading to
long hours on the part of our back office staff.

 -->  Beth is moving from Sun-O-S to Sun-Sularis which should allow us to
address the problem.  We have 4 contractors working on this and we are
expecting it to take 6 weeks.  Once this project is complete we can add
hardware and reduce the time problems.

3.   The traders need better real time management tools that ultimately
combine their physical and financial trades together and identify their real
time risk.
TDS was a system that was built to help this however it does not meet all the
traders needs.  This ultimately needs to be a system that is commissioned by
the               traders to meet their needs.

 -->  Phillip Allen is going to prepare a list of trader needs in
consultation with all the gas desks heads.   After this Beth should try to
come up with a plan to get a system that meets all the traders needs.

4.  The power system is unstable and fails on a regular basis.  This is
leading to long hours on the part of our back office staff.  Beth has made
progress in this area and we are going to monitor the improvements over the
next 4 to 6 weeks to see if the improvements prove to be working.

5.  Steve Natt  is going to put a plan together that meets with Kevin
Presto's approval that addresses our needs with respect to all-requirements
deals and volume management deals in the east.

6.  There will be no more business trips to London (somewhat kidding).

7.  Portland has issues with speed do to the fact that we still run their
books through an interface with Houston.

 -->  John Lavorato will talk to Tim Beldon and Beth to determine whether its
worthwile to put servers in Portland.

 -->  Since Tim was not in the meeting, John will make sure we are covering
all his needs.


Evidently, waiver was received but prohibits us from selling assets or prepaying debt without their approval. I will try to get a copy of the waiver. chase waiting to issue press release stating ene has received the amendment and that we have closed and funded our nng deal.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


I'm not sure.  I'll speak to him on Monday and let you know.  JR

JR

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise <Louise.Kitchen@ENRON.com>
To: Rub, Jenny <Jenny.Rub@ENRON.com>
Sent: Sat Jan 05 12:43:25 2002
Subject: RE: NETCO Employee

Why is he staying with the estate?

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Oxley, David
	Sent:	Saturday, January 05, 2002 11:26 AM
	To:	Rub, Jenny; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
	Cc:	Piper, Greg; Barnard, Marla; Kinningham, Laura; Cox, Paige; Dopson, LaMetrice; Slone, Jeanie; Fitzpatrick, Amy; Davies, Neil; Kitchen, Louise
	Subject:	RE: NETCO Employee

	Neil,

	Please make switch on master list.

	David
	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Rub, Jenny
	Sent:	Saturday, January 05, 2002 11:21 AM
	To:	Oxley, David; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
	Cc:	Piper, Greg; Barnard, Marla; Kinningham, Laura; Cox, Paige; Dopson, LaMetrice
	Subject:	NETCO Employee

	Steve Harrington was on our original list to NETCO employees and he has asked to stay with the estate.  Therefore we wish to replace Steve with Jason McNair.  Jason has agreed to make the switch.

	Please let me know if you have any questions or issues with this request.

	Thanks.   JR


AGA for 10/6/00 is 62


I talked to the guy yesterday and he said they would have it on . . . per
Dandy Don Rockies in the Woodlands will also have it . . . whatever the
hell that place is

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture--Houston
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com

            Val Generes
                                         To:     Kevin A. Boone@Accenture
            06/01/2001 11:07 AM          cc:     Bryan.Hull@enron.com, Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com,
                                         MMMarcantel@equiva.com, timothy_blanchard@enron.com
                                         Subject:     Re: LSU vs Tulane Baseball Game Televised in Houston

If you're sure that it's coming on, I'll be there.  The only thing is you
tell 6:30 and I'll show up at 7.  You need to say 6PM so I'm there on time.

Late -
Val
___________________________________________________________
Val Generes
eCommerce Technology Consultant
Houston 83/75984, 713-837-5984

            Kevin A. Boone
                                         To:     Val Generes, Bryan.Hull@enron.com, jason.lofland@ss.ps.ge.com,
            05/31/2001 12:54 PM          MMMarcantel@equiva.com, Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     LSU vs Tulane Baseball Game Televised in Houston

Allright ladies . . . Woodrow's is gonna be showing the LSU vs. Tulane game
tomorrow nite at 6:30 . . . anyone interested in drinkin a few beers and
watchin the Tigers spank that green wave ass?

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture--Houston
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com


I will have this to you tomorrow morning.  Sorry about that I was not in the office for the past week.

Thanks,
Holden

From:	Jennifer Ballas/ENRON@enronxgate on 04/03/2001 12:30 PM CDT
To:	Holden Salisbury/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, HQ1.EM2.Mark Menger@HQ1.EM2.Mark Menger@GWISE@enronXgate, HQ4.EM3.Alice Martin@HQ4.EM3.Alice Martin@GWISE@enronXgate
cc:	Jennifer Ballas/ENRON@enronxgate

Subject:	Fit Factory Dues

Dear Member-
I haven't received your payment for March.  Please read the attachment.
Thank you,
Jen Ballas
F2 Director
464-8075


Fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roan, Michael
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 12:56 PM
To:	Forster, David
Cc:	Day, Smith L.; Stroup, Kerry; Rodriquez, Andy
Subject:	FW: info on MISO startup conference call

David, as per emails last week this will be Enrons only chance to participate and provide feedback to MISO as it starts up operations.  Kerry was on the call this morning and while Enron may be able to add a member to this group it will be difficult.  If you are interested coordinate with Kerry...

regards
Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stroup, Kerry
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 12:45 PM
To:	Roan, Michael
Subject:	info on MISO startup conference call

Mike, here's some addtional information about the working group that was put together on this morning's conference call to work through implementation issues associated with MISO's commercial start-up.  Earlier this morning I emailed an agenda for the call and a revised commercial operation start-up plan.

The purpose of the call was to establish a small working group to identify and resolve, from a market perspective,  the issues associated with MISO's proposed start-up plan.  The working group will be working closely with transmission owner reps who are looking at start-up implementation from a systems perspective.  The working group will have a conference call on November 26 (the purpose of the call is to identify all of the implementation issues) , and working sessions on 12/3 and 12/4 prior to a presentation to an interim meeting of the MISO Advisory Committee on issues associated with 12/15 implementation plans.  The group will meet thereafter, at times yet unspecified, to deal with implementation issues associated with 1/1 and 2/1 implementation (including for example MISO tariff administration begining 1/1 for point-to-point and possibly existing network service and beginning 2/1 for new network service requests).

Persons/entities named to the working group this morning included Richard Doying, PGE; Jim Stanton, Calpine; someone from WPPI; Bill Jett, Cinergy Trading; Greg ____ from Dynegy; Rob Martin from Wisconsin Electric; Jim Bradkowski, DTE; and Malcolm Burgess, ATC.  If someone from Enron wishes to be added, they should talk to John Caitlin of the MISO staff ASAP.  John Caitlin is also accepting emails identifying implementation issues associated with the commercial operation plan that need to be resolved.


A few more...

 - pauserefreshes.jpg
 - niceartlady.jpg
 - noparking.jpg
 - ouch.jpg
 - bad2thebone.jpg
 - raceincentive.jpg
 - rockclimber.jpg
 - sorryflowers.jpg
 - touristattraction.jpg
 - whichwaytogo.jpg


FYI.  From IEP lobbyist.  Will have more information first thing in the AM.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:40 PM

In a nutshell:

The governor and assembly leadership (without Rod Wright) have reached
agreement and believe they have the 41 votes to support the below:
o There will be a $2.9 Billion bailout that can be used to pay the QF's and
the banks, but not the generators-either directly or indirectly-and will be
recovered through a Dedicated Rate Component charged to consumers 20 kwh and
above.

o Business and consumer interests are being briefed at the moment by the
staff of Davis and Angelides on the proposal.

o The easement language is consistent with the language proposed in 78xx

o The renewable portfolio standard language is primarily consistent with
82xx however discussions on final language are continuing now.

o Regarding the transmission lines and direct access, language has not been
written and discussions are also continuing.  In fact much of the bill is
being drafted now and is said to circulate tomorrow among members.  Davis
has indicated that he wants a vote as soon as Thursday

o The Senate has not agreed, but there are staff meetings going on now.

o The CPUC has not involved in the discussions, but the administration
continues to assure that no CPUC action will be taken in contrary to the
language of the bill.

Please feel free to call with questions and as always we will keep you
posted.

Thanks,

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
		(916) 448-9499


The August end of month close is behind us.  Once again, we learned some
things. We made progress.....but we also have issues to work.

Summary On Improvements For This End Of Month Close

I would like to congratulate the users, the application team and the DBA team
for a much improved end of month close for August gas. This would not have
been possible without the significant commitment, focus and teamwork
exhibited by all the folks involved in this effort.

The most tangible measure of progress over the July close :
We were able to keep all users in the system throughout the final week. No
one was kicked off the system.
The gas accounting close process finished on time. Key users and IT folks
didn't have to work significant overtime to finish the process.

 Improvements arose from :

Upgrading the Unify system to Sybase 12 with extra server memory. This
reduced system 'locking and blocking' and made it possible to keep all users
in the system throughout the week. Nightly settlements for gas invoicing also
ran much faster. Many thanks to the DBAs - Jim Ogg and Kishroe Bharathi-- for
many late nights and weekends. Many thanks also to the application team and
the users for lots of testing before the production rollout.

Conducting a pre-planning session that identified new end of month techniques
to improve efficiency. The users generated several new ideas including the
idea to pre-process PMAs the night before running the current mass draft.
This meeting provided several new approaches, a clear plan and cohesive
communication throughout the end of month process. Many thanks to the all the
users as well as Bob Superty, Bryce Baxter, Melissa Ratnala, Dave Nommensen
and Chris Schomer for making this happen. Many of these ideas will now be
part of a standard process.

The performance monitoring and tuning team reacted quickly to address changes
in system performance. Many thanks to Matt Pena and the rest of this team for
keeping the system up and running as fast as possible during the day.

Release of a new tuned version of the Accurals process that runs much faster.

Issues, Challenges, Action Items

While we made progress this month, there are still several significant issues
and opportunities for improvement. The following is a list of the things that
'went bump in the night' and the action items we've identified.

1. We experienced several Sybase 12.0 errors early in the week that impacted
gas business. All of these problems are now fixed. This had the following
business impacts:
The bridgeback of deals to Sitara was delayed. These deals were bridged
manually before the end of month valuation. We also fixed the code problem
that generated th original problem.
Global Systems replication to Unify was down on Monday. This problem was
fixed with a software patch from Sybase Monday evening. All affected deals
were then uploaded. Nominations were completed for these deals on Monday
through manual estimation by the schedulers.
Communication between the DBA group and the application group was delayed on
the Global Systems replication problem. This delayed our ability to notify
users of the problem. Communication on problems will be be improved in the
future. The default assumption will be to notify key application and
infrastructure personnel as soon as any serious problem is identified.

2.  We experienced a hardware issue with a bad server CPU at 3:00AM on
Thursday.  As a result, database backups ran into the morning when the server
came back up. This created slow system response and delayed logins for users
until 10:00 AM. This problem is now fixed.
 Action Item: Kishore will coordinate with Randy Matson from the
infrastructure group to coordinate a stress test of all production server
components. This will allow us to see if we can find any other marginal
components.  This will be completed by September 18.

3. All service PMAs for ENA and HPLC were not picked up by the Settlements
process. HPLC PMAs were run manually by the users. For ENA, missing PMAs were
immaterial and the users decided to close with these results. We have now
found and fixed the error that caused this problem.
 Action Item: Chris Schomer is having his team investigate this problem to
see if this is just a Sybase 12.0 issue or whether this error could have
impacted previous months. A determination should be available by September
15.

4. Enpower deal load did not load deals with referenced prices correctly.
These deals have now been successfully loaded and are currently completed
through the mass draft process for power. We have identified and fixed the
software error that caused this problem.

5. Power mass draft is now running very slow as compared to prior months. We
are currently working to complete the Power mass draft process. It will be
completed by the user deadline for close of business Wednesday Sept. 6.
 Action Item: Chris Schomer's team is investigating why the Power mass draft
is running so slow.  At present we do not have a definitive answer. We hope
to develop a definitive answer and action plan by September 15. Our current
hypothesis for why we have this problem includes :
Data changes - we now have a much higher volume of hourly priced deals
Potential database index issues. We will re-build all power database indexes
and re-compile the stored procedures
Sybase optimizer flakiness. We often see Sybase suddenly start to have
processing problems for no apparent reason.

Update On Future Tactical  And Strategic Improvements

We have several pending tactical Unify performance improvements that are in
process. These include:

1) Isolating Unify Gas on a server of it's own
2) Delivery of a middle tier mass draft process to reduce locking and blocking
3) Upgrade of the middle tier mass draft process to allow for drafting at a
deal level (rather than just a counter-party level)
4) Delivery of the nominations and balancing process on a middle tier
architecture.

Ramesh Rao and his team have the strategic projects progressing on schedule.
We are seeing significant performance gains in our testing of SQL Server over
Sybase. We also have identified a couple of hardware vendors that could
provide very large, scaleable computing environments for this type of Unify
architecture. We plan to have all critical evaluation testing completed by
the end of September as planned. We will present our recommendations along
with a high-level strategic delivery plan by early October.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns --  x39694 or (713)
503-4873.

Thanks.


UserName: CAMPB54792

You have an electronic trade confirmation in your Inbox.  To retrieve your
trade confirmation you may login to Datek Online and choose Document Delivery
from the Account Services menu, or you may click on the link below:

https://tumble2.datek.com/posta?x=1-9121138-9076912-GL14NATU

You have received this message because you subscribed to electronic delivery
for your Datek Online account.  If you wish to stop receiving account
documents via electronic delivery, you may cancel your subscription by
logging into Datek Online and choosing "Settings" from the
Account Services menu.

For more information please call Customer Support at 1-800-U2-DATEK, or send
email to support@datek.com.

Thank you for trading with us.

Datek Online Brokerage Services
Member NASD / SIPC


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 11, 2001 5:00pm through May 14, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:      AlSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:15:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 5/11/2001 at  4:15:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 5/12/2001 at  12:15:00 AM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at 1:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Trader DFS Re-Configuration
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: Data access
Backout: Continue to use ENEHOU
Contact(s): 	Frank Coles    (713)406-0470
		John Cheng     (713)853-1672

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:         ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
	Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 5/12/2001 at  4:00:00 PM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Disk upgrade for dual boot on server gfp1.
Environments Impacted:  Infinity development
Purpose: Disk upgrade needed to establish dual boot redundancy.
Backout: reinstall old configuration
Contact(s): 	Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP NFS
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT  thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at   8:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 5/12/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  OS upgrade on NFS servers calvin and hobbes.
Environments Impacted:  Sitara, Weather App. Infifity NFS
Purpose: The upgrade is needed for added SIFS functionality and support.  SIFs is the component that allows NT/UNIX access.
Backout: We can revert to one of several previous OS version stored on disks.
Contact(s): 	Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  Unix
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  4:00:00 PM CT
	Sat 5/12/2001 at  12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  2:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 5/12/2001 at  8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Neutron - Add a CPU boardd
Environments Impacted:  UniX Users
Purpose: increase cpus
Backout: Remove / replace board.
Contact(s): 	Adam DeRidder    713-853-1428
		Michael Barber      713-853-5530
		Wilford Stevens     713-853-7564

SITARA:    See above

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:       SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:   ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  4:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  3:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 5/11/2001 at  2:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  1:30:00 PM PT
	Fri 5/11/2001 at 10:00:00 PM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at 9:30:00 PM London
Outage:  Configure new hard disk and install all necessary OS and software.
Environments Impacted:  Power Settlements users
Purpose: Upgrade server
Backout: Re-install old hard disk, fall back to stand-by server as last resort.
Contact(s): 	Michael Cuccia    713-853-6629
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/21/2001>, published as of 11/21/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
05/14/2001 01:26 PM
To: V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geraldine Irvine/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jin Guo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louis Dicarlo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Santiago
Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven Curlee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alexandra
Villarreal/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathie Grabstald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Bates/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean
Boyle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria
Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladi Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Gil
Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phil
DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel Lisk/NA/Enron@Enron, Hillary
Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jan Sutherland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shannon Groenewold/ENRON@enronXgate, Shelly
Mendel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stacey J Brewer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne
Christiansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Evans/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dina
Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vineet Arora/NA/Enron@ENRON, Beth A
Ryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, David A
Terlip/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc De La
Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tushar Dhruv/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Yolanda Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Villasenor/OTS/Enron@Enron, Debra
Young/OTS/Enron@Enron, Jeff Arnold/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John
Reese/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Josh Mayes/OTS/Enron@Enron, Larry
Fenstad/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mark Adleman/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ann
Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Lynne Dix/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike
Thomas/OTS/Enron@Enron, Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rinetia
Turner/OTS/Enron@Enron, Robert Geheb/OTS/Enron@Enron, Ruthann
Frausto/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Tyrone Brown/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-17-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish,
simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey
will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:        Susan W. Pereira

Login ID:  spereir

Extension:  33229

Office Location:  EB3223F

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  no
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  no
    If yes, who?

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  no
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  no
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  no
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?  no
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:  mailbox

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From:  7    To:      5

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? no
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


you can borrow it whenever.  are you in town this weekend?