Certainly.  You might also be interested to know that I spoke at length today
with Lad Lorenz, and like most parties to this proceeding, SoCal Gas is
awfully tired of this fight.  Lad doesn't expect that SoCal will file any
sort of substantive challenge to the CPUC's decision.  Of course, SoCal, will
ultimately have the lead in writing the tariff sheets which implement the
features of the settlement.  I told him that, most likely, TW will monitor
the implementation phase of the proceeding but was probably not going to
mount any serious challenge to the CPUC's decision.

Susan Scott
11/29/2000 02:59 PM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Proposed Decision

Jeff -- good wrap-up.  May I forward to MKM and Drew?

Jeffery Fawcett
11/29/2000 10:58 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Proposed Decision

The GD article today regarding the proposed decision is a pretty good Readers
Digest version of the order.  Susan and I spoke with Jeff Dasovich and Mark
Baldwin yesterday, and the consensus of those conversations was that
Transwestern should remain involved in this proceeding only for purposes of
implementation/documentation.  Jeff offered that he might send a letter to
Governor Gray's office expressing both dismay and indignation that the CPUC
didn't complete their task and warning of the adverse outcome to California
ratepayers if these more modest reforms are approved.  He may ask the other
Comprehensive Settlement parties to join in signing the letter.  Susan, Mark
and I spoke about this idea later, and we've got some reservations about TW's
role in admonishing the CPUC.   We should probably wait to see this letter
first before committing to anything.

Bilas draft cautious toward SoCal competition
Mindful of the current chaos over energy markets in the state, California
Public Utilities
Commissioner Richard Bilas has recommended the adoption of a much more
moderate
approach to promoting competition on Southern California Gas, (SoCal) system.
In his draft decision, Bilas advised the commission to reject the unbundling
of intrastate
transmission and instead approve the first settlement filed in the case, the
less far-reaching
Interim Settlement (IS), submitted in December 1999. SoCal, San Diego Gas and
Electric and
other parties filed two more settlements after the IS, reaching a
comprehensive agreement in
April this year.

But since then, gas and power prices skyrocketed in the state, prompting a
consumer
backlash and giving competition a bad name.  The draft language notes that
the first interim
settlement was supported by more customer groups than the later agreements.
Recent events &lead us to conclude that the centerpiece of this
investigation, the unbundling
of intrastate transmission and the implementation of a system of firm,
tradable intrastate transmission rights, should be delayed,8 according to the
draft order.  &This unbundling is the basis of the [comprehensive settlement]
and we cannot approve it. We do not, however, wish to commit to paralysis
until 2006, as the [post-interim settlement] would have us do. Accordingly,
we believe Californians are better served at this juncture by the adoption,
with modifications, of the IS.8

The biggest change to the IS in the draft is the rejection of an automatic
capacity expansion
by SoCal at Wheeler Ridge, Calif., with rolled-in rates if certain criteria
are met.  El Paso
Energy had objected to the provision in the IS that would have allowed SoCal
to automatically
expand capacity at Wheeler Ridge by 100 million cfd if a certain number of
curtailments oc-curred.
El Paso objected to forcing all shippers to pay for the expansion at Wheeler
when only certain customers would benefit.
The draft says SoCal can file a separate application for the Wheeler Ridge
expansion, but approval would be conditioned on a traditional hearing process.

The draft decision would also:
 End SoCal,s current &windowing8 process, which limits shippers, ability to
change nominations
for deliveries between receipt points on the system. It is replaced with an
announced
daily calculation of capacity available at each receipt point;
 Establish Hector Road as a formal receipt point for nominations;
 Institute an operational flow order (OFO) procedure. Provides a forum for
more changes
in OFO procedures if excessive OFOs are made;
 Set up &pools8 of gas on the SoCal transmission system that are intended to
increase the
liquidity of gas trading;
 Make changes to balancing rules, while retaining the current 10% monthly
imbalance
tolerance;
 Make SoCal,s own gas acquisition unit subject to the same balancing rules
and penalties
as all other shippers;
 Allow some limited imbalances trading, as well as the right to assign and
reassign unbundled
storage contract in a secondary market, with a SoCal electronic bulletin
board set up
for it;
 Unbundle from core transportation rates the storage capacity cost exceeding
that required
for core minimum reliability; and
 Provide for rate recovery of up to $3.5 million in implementation costs.

In addition, the draft would unbundle core interstate transportation from
rates, eliminate
core contribution to noncore interstate transition cost surcharges, eliminate
the core subscription
option as well as the caps for core aggregation programs.  The threshold for
participating in
core aggregation is reduced, and billing options are offered to core
aggregators.

Bilas, draft also warned that the commission may come back in two years to
open another
investigation into gas competition, taking into account any changes in market
conditions.
Bilas gave a little more insight into his decision in the text of the draft.
&The cost of gas as a commodity has vastly increased at the border, showing a
differential
between the basin and border prices that is more than the cost of transport
and related services;
we question whether there will be an opportunity for discounting by marketers
if more competition is allowed,8
Bilas wrote in the draft decision.  &With half the state already committed to
a
restructured competitive natural gas industry, it suddenly seems as if the
benefits of such re-
structuring to enhance competition are speculative, particularly at this
time.  With one leg in the
water, the current has switched direction and it will be difficult, if not
foolhardy, to reach our
goals by forging ahead.

&We choose to take a cautious approach again,8 the draft continues. &Rather
than proceeding
to unbundle transmission in Southern California now, we approve, with
modifications, the settle-
ment suggesting smaller steps towards a competitive market. Additionally, we
unbundle core
interstate transmission and once again urge the Legislature to pass consumer
protection legisla-
tion aimed at unregulated marketers while we facilitate growth in core
aggregation programs.8
The CPUC would not rule out the unbundling of intrastate transmission and
other restruc-
turing in the future &but believe that at this point in time the certain
benefits do not outweigh
the costs to most ratepayers.8

All drafts must be filed 30 days before the meetings at which they will be
discussed. The
draft decision is currently on the agenda for the CPUC,s Dec. 21 meeting.


(See attached file: HPLN0313.xls)

 - HPLN0313.xls


I will call him again on Monday.  Do I get a commission.  Just kidding.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 4:23 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Subject:

Stan

I haven't heard from the fellow from El Paso


Jim,

Since Susan will miss this call/meeting (vacationing in Mexico), would you like me to calendar about 30 minutes with her next week to fill her in?

Linda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:53 PM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ramon; Ausenhus, Kara; Barnes, Lynnette; Bellas, Kirsten; Binns, Darran; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Dasovich, Jeff; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Gottfredson, Bryan; Guerrero, Janel; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hartfield, Rita; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Lawrence, Linda L.; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Long, Chris; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Moore, Bill; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; O'connell, Earlene; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perez, Gus; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Reyna, Margo; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stephens, Sharonda; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Stubbings, Randy; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	Department Conference Call

Per Rick's promise on last Friday's conference call, he will hold another general update call as follows:

Date:		Wednesday, October 31

Time:		10:30 AM (CDT)

Number:	1-800-283-1805

Location:	ECN 4701(for those in Houston)

Thanks!

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160


Jim - Quail Ridge issue has been resolved.  UC was in error and have
withdrawn their complaint to the PUC.

Tom

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Maric Munn <Maric.munn@ucop.edu>@ENRON@EES
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:04 PM
> To:	Riley, Tom
> Subject:	Fwd: Enron contract
>
> Tom:
>
> The Quail Ridge Reserve has withdrawn their complaint to the PUC.  I have
> left a message for Joyce at the PUC and will talk with her when she
> returns
> my tomorrow to let her know that the complaint was registered in
> error.  This was caused by an internal UC communications problem and I
> sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.
>
> Please let me know if you need me to do anything else to resolve this
> matter.
>
> Maric Munn
> Associate Director Energy and Utility Services
> UC Office of the President
> (510) 987-9392
>
>
>
> >X-Sender: cynoah@popserv.ucop.edu
> >Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:07:38 -0800
> >To: Maric Munn <Maric.munn@ucop.edu>
> >From: Chen Yin Noah <ChenYin.Noah@ucop.edu>
> >Subject: Fwd: Enron contract
> >
> >>From: "Boucher, Virginia" <vlboucher@ucdavis.edu>
> >>To: "Chen Yin Noah (E-mail)" <ChenYin.Noah@ucop.edu>
> >>Subject: Enron contract
> >>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:57:11 -0800
> >>
> >>This is to confirm that Dan Tolson has withdrawn his complaint to the
> PUC and
> >>to confirm that, as Reserve Manager, I did not authorize the complaint
> and
> >>have requested that it be withdrawn.
> >>
> >>If you need anything further, please let me as soon as possible.
> >>
> >>Virginia L. Boucher
> >>Reserve Manager UC Davis Natural Reserve System
> >>2112 Wickson Hall
> >>Davis, CA 95616
> >>(530) 752-6949
> >>(530) 752-3350 fax
> >>vlboucher@ucdavis.edu
> >
> >--
> >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> >Chen Yin Noah
> >Associate Director
> >Natural Reserve System
> >University of California
> >1111 Franklin St, 6th Floor
> >Oakland, CA 94607-5200
> >Phone: (510) 987-0151 / Fax: (510) 763-2971
> >NRS Website: http://nrs.ucop.edu
> >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
>


ou was impressive.  crouch sucked after the 1st quarter.  i think they told
bob " don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. "  he was a nice
guy, but didn't produce.  he once said to me " if i didn't have this goddam
kid i could retire".  his kid less than 1 year old.  talk to you later.


Jose - thanks.  Also, feel free to send to JoAnn Hill in Houston.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bestard, Jose
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 11:53 AM
To:	Treadwell, Robin L.
Cc:	Assad, Sergio; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Pep Feedback- Canovas and Maurer

Robin. I completed both last week. Where should I send the forms for Human Resources?

Jose


Are you holding up this cpy for any reason?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 04:34 PM -----

	Leslie Hansen
	10/18/2000 02:54 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Sempra Energy Solutions

Doesn't ring any bells and I don't have any files re this CP.  Do I need to
be working on one?

Leslie

	Tana Jones
	10/18/2000 01:00 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sempra Energy Solutions

Are you working on an ETA amendment for them?


yeah.  i think they will go to the rose bowl.


Thanks.  It would of course be easiest to make the calls and say "pass it out
now, as is,"  but if more is needed to fix the credit issue, want to be
prepared to tell them how the decision needs to be modified.  If it's fine as
is, all the better.

Best,
Jeff

	Christian Yoder@ECT
	02/28/2001 12:59 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: pgboylston@stoel.com, jbennett@gmssr.com
		 Subject: Re:

We like the Alternate Order.  It is a big step in the right direction.  Jean
Bennett is preparing a draft letter in support which we were going to file by
no later than Friday.  Pat Boylston and I will go over the letter and discuss
it with Jean.  I'm not really sure we are going to want to do any surgery on
the wording or not.  I invite Jean and Pat to give you a quick comment on
this.  ----cgy

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 02/28/2001 12:58 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Calger
cc:
Subject:

Christian:

Could you let me know as soon as possible if 1) the proposed decision that I
faxed you yesterday is go to go, i.e., adequately addresses our concerns
regarding creditworthiness or if 2) we want to recommend some additional
provisions?  If we want to recommend additional provisions, could you let me
know what those are?  I want to make a run at getting this deal done at the
CPUC ASAP,and would like to push Peevey to get Davis to have the PUC pass it
out at their next meeting. But need to know if it's good as is or needs some
tweeking.  Thanks very much.

Best,
Jeff


If you like, I can get you database access that will allow you to review the
comments between Legal & Credit.  We do not give this level of access to
non-Legal & Credit people because we are trying to limit certain information
for client-attorney privilege (not to mention the business people give away
our negotiating positions!).  If you would like this level of access, let me
know and I will put in a request.  This level of access will also give you
edit capability, so you need to be careful not to change things by mistake.


I was out sick yesterday afternoon, 02/13, and will be taking vacation tomorrow, 02/15.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:34 PM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Mark McConnell (E-mail); Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject:	Time Reports Due Thursday

Don't forget to submit your time reports by Thursday morning.

Thanks in advance,

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Julia:
I thought that it would be easier to e-mail you since we keep missing each
other on the phone.  All of the St. Clair's are doing well.  Charles keeps
growing.  At his last visit last week he was 11 1/2 pounds and 22 inches.
Needless to say he likes to eat.  He is gradually starting to sleep more at
night but is still pretty unpredictable and I've just gotten used to not
getting alot of sleep.  Having Bill home with me is a big help and it makes
it alot easier for me since we can trade off.

Physically, I am feeling almost 100%.  I started running a few weeks ago just
to keep my sanity and have started playing tennis again although it is going
to take a long time for me to get back into playing shape.  Arthur is very
much into tennis and I am enjoying getting to watch him play.  He played in
his first tournament over the weekend and did very well.  Bill and I are
hoping that he keeps it up.  He has been great with the baby as I expected.
He is a calming influence on him and really interacts well with him.  I feel
very, very fortunate.

How are you doing and how are the boys?  I miss work and the interaction with
everyone, but at the same time I am enjoying my time at home.  I think that
you know how I must feel and I'm glad that I still have some time to think
about it.  I can't imagine having to go back after 6 weeks as I am just
beginning to feel good physically.  Carol St. Clair

Arthur is back in school and is a big help at home.  I'm enjoying being home
with him when he gets home from school and its nice to be able to visit him
while he is in school.

I hope that you are doing well and not killing yourself up there.  How are
your parents doing?  Please give them my best.  I keep promising to come up
for a visit and I will soon.  Tomorrow (Thursday) may be a possibility.  Hope
to see you soon.  Take care.

Carol


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hendrickson, Scott
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	'onvacation <onvacation@pdq.net>'
Subject:	RE: Hello from Prague

I doubt you will get this b4 you get back, but I'll write anyway.  Yes, I had a GREAT weekend, but I was partying way too much!!!  Went out every night from Wednesday to Sunday!!!  I'm paying the price now though.  But I had a really good time and kept very busy :).  I've been two times to your house so far.  Everything seems fine.  I saw Ellie the first time - pigging out on the canned food.  Didn't see Frankie, but I didn't look either.  The weather here has been very hot, but sunny.

Sounds like Prague is treating you well.  Is it beautiful?  Tell Peggy I'm not spreading myself TOO THIN...but remember, you can never be too thin or too rich!!!  I can't believe the prices.  And if you get me something that costs 20 cents you better get alot of them!!!  HEHEHEHE

I'll go to your house again on Wednesday before you get back on Thursday.  Sadly, the Tsunami has not been used - although there were opportunities!!!  hehehehe

Miss you!  Hurry back!

Scott

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	onvacation <onvacation@pdq.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-onvacation+20+3Convacation+40pdq+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of onvacation <onvacation@pdq.net>
Sent:	Sunday, June 03, 2001 6:58 AM
To:	Hendrickson, Scott
Subject:	Hello from Prague

Hello Scooter,

Hope you had fun on your three dates this weekend!!!  (you slut!)

You know I am jealous.  Peggy says not to spread yourself too thin!!!!

You would not believe how cheap it is here.  Today at the musuem I had a
sandwich, snickers and a cafe latte for $1.50!!!  A three course dinner last
night cost $3.00.

The bad news is that your gift cost $0.20!!  (ha, ha)  I really haven't bought
it yet.

Take Care,

Miss you,

Julie  :-)


The majority has spoken:

Our pre reorg. meeting is set for tomorrow, Thursday 4:00 - 5:30 P.M. at
Ninfa's.

Please bring fresh and radical ideas and leave your egos and self interests
at the office.


sold 10,000 MMbtu/day of Cal 05 nymex at $3.695/mmbtu.
sold 5,000 mmbtu/day of cal 04 nymex at $3.58/mmbtu.


Attached is a DRAFT  TBMA/ISDA document comparing S.420 and H.R. 333.
Please note that this is a draft document and should not be circulated to
hill or regulatory staff at this time.  The document compares each of the
relevant sections of the bill and includes comments on the preferred section
where the House and Senate provisions differ.  Please do not hesitate to
contact me or Frank Hampton  if you have any questions.  Many thanks!   --
Stacy

 <<Side-by-Side Analysis Bankruptcy Legislation.doc>>

Stacy Carey
Director North American Regulatory Policy
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org

 - Side-by-Side Analysis Bankruptcy Legislation.doc


Saturday, December 15, 2001

Dear Debra,

Travelocity Fare Watcher, your personal airfare tracking
service, has found fare changes in 1 of your markets.

Note: Fares change quickly and sell out fast. Visit Travelocity
now to take advantage of this great opportunity!  Click on this
link or paste the URL into your browser:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemindiv.ctl?fw=99091015983150&Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

HAVE YOUR TRAVEL NEEDS CHANGED?

Looking to go someplace new? Be sure to update your Fare Watcher
subscription to include your favorite destinations.

FARES

*  QHO-TUL   FROM: Houston All Airports (QHO)
             TO:   Tulsa, OK (TUL)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE        WAS        DIFFERENCE
             ---------      -------      ----------
             $128.00        $166.00      -$38.00

Thank you for choosing Travelocity as your one-stop travel
resource!

Sincerely,

The Travelocity Team
Travelocity.com - Go Virtually Anywhere
http://www.travelocity.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------

VACATION DEALS!

Hot deals to the Caribbean, Las Vegas, and more!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_VAC,00.html

CRUISE DEALS!

Don't miss a look at our incredible Cruise Deals! Updated daily,
find the voyage that suits your budget!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_CRU,00.html

SAVE $75 IN AIRFARE

Get $75 in Rebates on your next Airfare Purchases!
Join the Travelocity Preferred Traveler Program and you'll
receive up to $75 in rebates on your next three flights, hotel
savings and room upgrades, up to 20% off at restaurants
nationwide, and more. Enroll today!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/preferredtraveler/?source=PM

EARN FREE TRAVEL. NO RESTRICTIONS!

The NEW Travelocity World MasterCard
Earn points towards free travel with new Travelocity MasterCard!
You'll earn 1 point for every dollar spent. Earn 8,000 points
and you'll receive $100 off your next Travelocity.com booking.
We'll spot you 4,000 points to get started, so you are already
half way there! Visit http://www.travelocitycard.com to apply.

IMPORTANT FARE INFORMATION:

All fares are quoted in US Dollars.  Fares shown are for one
adult round-trip between your selected cities and are subject
to additional charges, including, but not limited to, Passenger
Facility Charges (ranging from $2-$18), Federal Segment Fees of
$2.75 per segment (defined as a takeoff and a landing), and
taxes/fees associated with international itineraries of up to
USD $113 or local currency equivalent. Fuel surcharges, if applicable
are included in the fees listed.

Total fare per passenger, including all charges, will always
be displayed to you prior to final ticket purchase. Please note
that fares are subject to restrictions, may not be available on
all flights, and may change without notice. For detailed descriptions
of the fare rules, click on the corresponding rules link.

CHANGE OR CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO FAREWATCHER EMAIL
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

RETRIEVE YOUR PASSWORD
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognpwdform.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN


Hey:  we meeting tonite?  can you BELIEVE this bloody election?

	Jacqueline Kelly <JKelly@FairIsaac.com>
	11/07/2000 04:28 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, Jacqueline Kelly
<JKelly@FairIsaac.com>, "'Kimberly Kupiecki'" <kkupiecki@arpartners.com>,
tedchin@hotmail.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Meet

I agree that we need to get together.  I am going to grind out a spreadsheet
tomorrow night.  Unfortunately, my friends birthday dinner is Thursday
night.  I know Ted is going to be gone for the weekend.

Can we get together tomorrow or over the weekend without Ted?  Ted is going
to do some research on the discount rate, which can be dropped in to any
analysis that we come up with.

What do you think?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:21 PM
To: Jacqueline Kelly; 'Kimberly Kupiecki'; tedchin@hotmail.com
Subject: Meet

Hey, I know it's a pain, but I think there would be value in getting
together (if folks are available) on Thursday evening from 7-10 with (lots
of) beer and pizza and grind through the finance case.  We can do it at my
apartment, or anywhere else you folks would like to do it.  Thoughts?


Have your received the original signed agreement from CSN?

 Regarding Nicor,  I have not had a response from those guys regarding the Masters.  I have left a message with Jim Hunt regarding status but he has not responded to date.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


In case you had not heard, Lou Pai has done some fundraising for Franks and
both he and his(Lou's) sister know him fairly well.  Keep it in mind if at
some point we need to get in to see him.

	From:  Jeffrey Keeler                           08/23/2000 03:44 PM

To: Clayton Seigle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David L Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: pipeline aftermath

Clayton:

Here are some preliminary answers to your questions (and I have copied GPG
and Government Affairs folks as well to share this information):

1)  I am currently assessing the situation regarding pipeline safety
legislation.  This week has been very quiet on Capitol Hill as all of the
members are back in the states on August recess running for re-election and
it is a big vacation week for staff...but here's what I am hearing:

As you may or may not know, we have been been very active this year trying to
temper pipeline safety legislation that was fairly reactionary in the wake of
last summer's liquid pipeline accident in Bellingham, WA.

SENATE:  In June, Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Slade Gorton (R-WA) led the
charge to pass a pipeline safety bill (S. 2438) out of the Senate Commerce
Committee, and that bill is awaiting floor action in the Senate.   Because of
the hasty way in which S. 2438 was drafted and passed, there was a
realization by both Republicans and Democrats in the Senate that the bill
could not make it to the floor for a vote until some serious changes were
made -- mostly things that were deal breakers for industry.  Enron and El
Paso were leading the charge and we had a number of Senators backing our
efforts to negotiate changes, including Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS),
Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), John Breaux (D-LA), and Sam Brownback (R-KS).
From what I've learned since the accident, these Senators are not changing
their strategy and are still asking for the same improvements.  Fortunately,
most of the changes we were looking to make were fairly technical and not the
types of things that would be seriously compromised by the accident.
Industy was already in the position of having to accept a number of things
they never would have if not for he Bellingham incident...the El Paso
incident just reinforces those.   The biggest potential effect I see from the
El Paso accident is an increased effort to pass something before the Congress
adjourns in early October.  The New Mexico Senators are already calling for a
floor vote on the McCain/Gorton legislation, and I there will certainly be
greater pressure on leaders to wrap up negotiations, get agreement from all
sides on a bill, and move it unanimously through a vote on the Senate floor.

HOUSE:   The House is moving a bit more slowly, but again, I'd expect the El
Paso situation to expedite things somewhat.  There were several bills
introduced in the House that were not moving anywhere, including an identical
copy of the McCain legislation introduced by Rep. Bob Franks (R-NJ).  Franks
is now anxious to move legislation, as he is running for Senate and would
love to take credit for helping out on an issue of national visibility.
Before the accident, House Tranportation Committee leaders on both the
Democrat and Republican side were working on a "consensus" bill that they
could introduce in early September and move quickly through the Committee and
to the House floor.   I'm told that negotiations on that legislation are
moving forward and a draft bill will be produced shortly.  Unlike our
experience in the Senate, we have had significant input into the bill in
advance, and expect something that we can live with -- and something more
reasonable than the McCain bill.   With that said, there may be an effort to
expand the bill in a few areas because of the El Paso accident, so we'll have
to see what kind of hand we're dealt in the next few weeks.

Overall, I'd expect pipeline safety legislation to be given higher priority
when Congress returns after Labor Day.  In the absence of this accident, I
would have given it slim odds of passing in the few short weeks until
adjournment, with appropriations bills taking up most of Congress' precious
time.   Now there will be greater pressure to come to consensus and move
bills through by an expedited process, so that everyone running for election
in November can show that they've done something about this terrible
tragedy.   With that said, there's still not that much time to get
legislation through, so I'd say that there's still a chance it may not get
done this year.   If I had to attach a number to it, I'd say that the El Paso
accident improves the chances of legislation going all the way to probably
50-60%.

2)  Gas supply to California:   I'll have to do some more checking in this
area and get back to you.   All I've heard so far is that the safety
questions that remain may slow the speed of restarting flow on the line,
notwithstanding that El Paso thinks it can have things running again fairly
quickly.   I'm sure the power crunch in California will put some
counter-pressure on, but I just don't have good intelligence on this yet.

With all this said, I'm on vacation this week and parts of next week
finishing up some leave I've taken for the birth of our new baby daughter, so
I may not have an additional report for you until early to mid next week.

If you have questions, please respond by e-mail, or leave a message on my
voice mail at 202-466-9157.

Regards,

Jeff Keeler

	From:  Cynthia Sandherr                           08/23/2000 09:48 AM

Sent by: Allison Navin
To: Clayton Seigle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: pipeline aftermath

Jeff Keeler in our office handles pipeline safety issues and I am copying him
on this e-mail so that he may reply to you directly.  Also, Cynthia is out of
the office through the end of the week but will be reachable tomorrow and
Friday.  Thanks.

Allison

Clayton Seigle@ECT
08/22/2000 06:29 PM

To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: pipeline aftermath

Hi Cynthia:

The commercial officers here are very concerned with the El Paso pipeline
explosion in New Mexico.  We would love to get some input from your group on
the following questions if possible:

1.  What is the status of pipeline safety legislation on the Hill, and what
is the outlook for action between now and the end of the year?

2.  What are people from California saying about the added pressure on gas
supplies, and what are people from New Mexico saying about restarting the
flow of gas while safety questions remain?

These questions come straight from the top, and any information you could
provide would be very helpful.  Please write me back or call and let me know
if/when you think we might be able to get some initial answers.

Thanks very much!

Clay


******  ******      **       *************************************
**        **       *  *      ***   U.S. Department of Energy    **
****      **      ******     * Energy Information Administration *
**        **     **    **    ** To unsubscribe see the message ***
******  ******  **      **   ************* footnote **************
EIA, the Nation's clearinghouse for energy statistics. ***********
******************************************************************

(NOTE: To best view this document, your email software should
be set to view the item in an 80 character format, using a
"non-proportional" font, e.g. courier)
******************************************************************

This is to notify you of recent natural gas analysis released by the U.S.
Energy
Information Administration which can be found on our web site.

The Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting released an analysis report
entitled "U.S. Natural Gas Markets: Recent Trends and Prospects for the
Future".

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/naturalgas/pdf/oiaf00102.pdf
<http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/naturalgas/pdf/oiaf00102.pdf>

Please Note:  If the link does not work by clicking on the above URL, please
do
the following in order to view the products:

Go to EIA's home page at www.eia.doe.gov <http://www.eia.doe.gov>
On the left sidebar, click on "What's New"

--------------------------  To Unsubscribe  -----------------------------
You are currently subscribed to ng_analysis as: [Mike.Grigsby@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-ng_analysis-124863F@tonto.eia.doe.gov.
Please do not use the reply button.


3 is a good time, please add Darron Giron, Dave Baumbach and Kam Keiser.
Thanks for your help.
PL


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042411.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: 132.77 / Final: 132.70)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Forgot to copy you on this earlier.  Please review and let me know if you
have any comments.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 10:08 AM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	04/23/2001 10:45 AM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Netting Language for Sierra Pacific Power

Attached are the two confirms for the Sierra Pacific Power gas deal with the
netting language inserted in the confirms as requested by credit.  Please
review and let me know if you have any questions.  Christian Yoder in
Portland also reviewed the language.


Attached is a revised draft reflecting our review of your comments.  You may
call me (713.221.1202) or Randy (713.853.3212) with comments or questions.

 - #1196421 v4 - WISVEST SETTLEMENT - PNE.doc


For your review:


I have been updated by Susan on her (largely futile) efforts to push ECS on
the $200k we think they owe us.  Martha, please get me a half hour Tuesday
with Susan, James and Kevin so we can decide how to get closure on this.  If
I understand ECS' position, their argument is that CDEC stonewalled and
delayed granting access to the critical website and therefore its not ECS'
fault that manual peak monitoring wasn't operational until December .  That
argument, it seems to me, is BS because we never heard even a shred of
warning or request for help from ECS on getting things moving, right?  At
minimum, TW could have raised holy hell with TriState and CDEC management to
get things moving if we knew that ECS was stymied.  But we heard nothing.  Is
that our story?

If its going to take me doing some yelling at Knippa or Steve and Rod talking
to Redmond, lets decide what the script is and get it done.


Not sure how I got your e-mail at v.charlie.weldon@enron.com but my username
is v.charles.weldon@enron.com


Should you have any HR Issues please direct them to Jeanie Slone per Kim Melodick...thanks for your help.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Ava-35842/Market Services Council Mtg. conference room 42C2

Date:		7/12/2001
Time:		10:30 AM - 12:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Just in case my recent lack of emails has left you thinking that you can wait
until the New Year to get working on your Order of Good Cheer
fundraising...think again!!

Its now time to take 15 minutes out of your day today to send those letters
off.  You will be so glad when you come back from ripping up the town/ski
hill/beach, etc. on New Year's Eve to know that you just have to call up your
prospective donors and close the deal.  Too easy!!    If you arn't already,
get motivated -- there are a whole bunch of kids showering in freezing cold
facilities up at the wilderness school, and studying in cramped quarters who
will appreciate our help.

I have heard from about half of you and I know that lots of you are ahead of
the game -- your letters have been sent out and you are working hard on this
-- keep it up and let me or Brian B. know if you need more brochures, etc.

Have a great holiday and I look forward to hearing about the BIG BUCKS you
are raising!

Liz
 - att1.htm


jeff,

Is the problem that the energy DWR purchased is above market and not needed
by CORE  or  just above market.  If the energy is needed by CORE wouldn't the
deals just be blended in as costs like utility gen and QF supply?  If the
energy is not needed now could the state sell back the excess then compute
the exact loss and put a surcharge on rates for all or some customers that
recoup that amount over time.  Once again there would be a CTC type recovery
period but there would not be the risk that the market price must stay below
a fixed price for the stranded costs to be recovered.

Phillip
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Steffes, James; Shapiro, Richard;
skean@enron.com; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Allen, Phillip K.; Yoder,
Christian; Hall, Steve C.
Subject: Call to Discuss Possible Options to Mitigate Effect of DWR
Contracts--Privileged and Confidential
Sensitivity: Confidential

PLEASE KEEP THIS NOTE, AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE NOTE CONFIDENTIAL.

As folks are aware, we have been engaged in closed-door negotiations for the
past two weeks regarding a possible market-based solution to California's
electricity crisis.
In the room are the major large customer groups, environmentalists, small
customers (TURN), Independent Energy Producers, labor, the Western States
Petroleum Association, and Enron.
The negotiations were convened by the Speaker of the Assembly (Bob Hertzberg).
When Hertzberg convened the meeting, he told the parties that he wanted to
achieve a core/noncore structure, similar to the structure in place in
California's gas market (i.e., large customers are required to buy gas from
the market, with Direct Access available to all other customers).
In effect, "core" customers (rez and small business) would be served by the
utilities' retained generating assets and QF contracts; and large customers
would go to market.
The core/noncore structure would begin 1.1.03.
The negotiating group has struggled over the past two weeks, but is close
devising a framework for core/noncore in Californis (but who pays for the
utilities' past debts and the costs of DWR power purchased between January
and today remain very contentious).
Unfortunately, with the release of the information regarding the DWR
contracts last Friday, it is now clear that achieving a core/noncore
structure will be very difficult unless something is done to mitigate the
contracts.
The problem is that, if core is served by utility gen and QFs, and large
customers are in the market, there is no (or very little) need for the DWR
contracts.  Instead, they look like a signficant stranded cost.
Hertzberg and the negotiating group are looking to Enron for creative ways to
address "the DWR contract problem" in order to prevent the contracts from 1)
killing the core/noncore deal and 2) forcing California to accept a structure
focused on a state power authority headed-up by David Freeman that does not
include Direct Access.
Christian Yoder and Steve Hall are reviewing the contracts to analyze any
"out clauses" that the buyer and/or the seller might have under the contract
provisions.  (My cursory review of the contracts suggests that "outs" for the
state are minimal or nonexistent.)
In addition, we've started batting around ideas about how the State might
reform the contracts.
All this said, want to let everyone know that we have made it extremely clear
that Enron fundamentally opposes any and all attempts to unilaterally
abrogate anyone's contract rights.

We'd like to have a quick call tomorrow (30-60 minutes) to brainstorm some
options that we can offer Hertzberg to handle the contracts and keep the
core/noncore solution alive.  We'd like to try to have the the call at 1 PM
PDT.  Please let me know if this works for you, and if it doesn't, please let
me know if there's a time after 1 PM PDT that works for you.

Thanks,
Jeff


The weekly conference call will take place at 1:30 p.m. CDT on Wednesday, May
23, 2001.

Dial In:  1-888-285-4585

Participant: 536220

Host:  121970 (Sheila)

EB38C1 has been reserved for those of you in Houston.


September 8, 2000

     Teco Tap       50.000 / HPL IFERC ; 25.000 / Enron

     LS HPL LSK IC       15.000 / Enron

September 9, 2000

     Teco Tap       15.417 / HPL IFERC ; 69.583 / HPL Gas Daily ; 40.000 /
Enron

September 10, 2000

     Teco Tap       112.500 / HPL Gas Daily ; 25.000 / Enron

     LS HPL LSK C        15.000 / Enron

---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities on
09/11/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Jones
09/11/2000 01:31 PM

To:   Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Gary Green/Texas Utilities@TU,
      daren.j.farmer@enron.com, gary.a.hanks@enron.com,
      carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, earl.tisdale@enron.com,
      ami.chokshi@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Enron / HPL Actuals for Sept. 8-10, 2000

September 8, 2000

     Teco Tap       50.000 / HPL IFERC ; 25.000 / Enron

     LS HPL LSK IC       15.000 / Enron

September 9, 2000

     Teco Tap       85.000 / HPL IFERC ; 40.000 / Enron

September 10, 2000

     Teco Tap       112.500 / HPL IFERC ; 25.000 / Enron

     LS HPL LSK IC       15.000 / Enron


I just received word that I'm losing my garage apt. renter as of Nov. 30...
If any of you know someone who is looking for a place, have them call me!!
(I found my current renter through a friend and it has worked out great.)
Here are the specifics:

2 bedroom/1 bath garage apartment in Houston Heights (Cortlandt St.).
Hardwood floors,  lots of windows, new window A/C units, washer/dryer hookup,
garage parking space.  Cats OK.  $650/month.  Available December 1.  Call
713-853-0596 (day) or 713-864-4960 (evening).

Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000
09:35 AM ---------------------------

	Michael Anderson @ AZURIX
	08/22/2000 08:36 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RAB Graph

I believe this will be helpful in your analysis.

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX on 08/22/2000
08:35 AM ---------------------------
From: Keith Harris/WSX/AZURIX@Exchange on 08/03/2000 01:40 PM GDT
To: Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX
cc: Colin Skellett/WSX/AZURIX@Exchange

Subject: FW: Amended Index Graph

Michael

I have got CSFB working on the amendment you asked for.

In the meantime we have produced a graph which shows, as indices, market
values of the water companies and the RAB of the industry since
privatisation.  The following points come out
1 Market values overtime have been 1.1x RAB
2 The result is significantly skewed by the period between Mid 1997 and end
1998 when the ratio was c1.5x.
3 The premium to RAB is only found at a time when political uncertainty has
been removed the companies are able to outperform the regulatory deal
significantly.  Those days are gone - a fact witnessed by the decline in
share prices in the last year

Just to note that the graph we have produced here is a weighted average of
water companies - whereas the figures we did yesterday on the RAB market
value ratio is a straight average.  Obviously that influences the numbers a
little.

On CustomerCo.  CSFB have contacted around 7 energy companies.  The result
has been positive and they are prepared to enter our journal exercise.  I
await a revised fee proposal but CSFB have been advised that it should be
more modest than the last one !

Keith

 -----Original Message-----
From:  David Kitchener
Sent: 03 August 2000 13:27
To: Keith Harris
Subject: Amended Index Graph


Want to Get Innovative at Home?

We are excited to extend an invitation to you to participate in Pilot 3 of
Enron's new ClickAtHome program.

The ClickAtHome program is Enron's innovative solution to provide eligible
employees with a high-end computer and high-speed internet connection.

If you are interested in participating in the ClickAtHome pilot program,
please read about  "How to get started in Pilot 3" by clicking the link below.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/pilot3.ppt

Details pilot member expectations, commitments, and a tentative pilot time
table.

Ordering will begin on Friday, January 12th.    To get more information about
the program or place your order, visit http://clickathomepilot.enron.com

Dell will be in Houston to assist you with any questions you may have :
 1/16/2001  8:00:00 AM-5:00:00 PM
 1/17/2001  8:00:00 AM-5:00:00 PM
 1/18/2001  8:00:00 AM-5:00:00 PM
 1/19/2001  8:00:00 AM-2:30:00 PM
 Location: EB568 and EB560

If you have questions, please send them to clickathomepilot3@enron.com.

We look forward to enabling you to Get Innovative at Home!

ClickAtHome Project Team


Perfectly. thanks

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 05/01/2001 08:19:28 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Salmon officers

Kay:

The March 8, 2001 written consent of Salmon electing officers provides that
Chris Calger is a Vice President.  Hope this answers the question.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


See the attached for the NNG Card list by team. SC= SouthCentral Team N=North team and SC-N means both claim the customer.

John Buchanan


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Candella, Therese
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To:	Langston, Joe; Cox, Paige
Cc:	Moore, Kevin G.; Crenshaw, Shirley; Dupont, Anita; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Laptop

Joe
Just a little note....
Since the Research Group will be gone on Jan. 31, 2002, I want to make sure that you know that the Research Group Laptop (asset tag # 990860) that was returned to me will managed by Kevin Moore as of today 1/24/02.  Kevin will be the only remaining employee from this group.  If there is anymore information needed pertaining to this please feel free to contact me at x35245.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Candella, Therese
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:21 PM
To:	Langston, Joe
Subject:	RE: Laptop

Thanks, Joe.

Therese

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Langston, Joe
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:07 AM
To:	Candella, Therese
Subject:	Laptop

Theresa,

I returned the laptop labelled 'Research' to the cubicle right outside of 1968.  I was told that the person who sits there is not in today, so I wanted to let you know what has been done with it.

Joe Langston
x58883


Can you place these on my calendar please.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 01:02 PM -----

	Jeffrey T Hodge
	Sent by: Jenny Helton
	10/24/2000 04:28 PM

		 To: Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: East Origination and Gas Trading Staff Meeting

Attached is a memo regarding the above-referenced meeting.


Here is a new ISDA request for Synergy Oil & Gas, Inc. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call.

Thanks,

Brad
ext. 5-7749


and I'll conference you in as soon as we finish w/ the physical power stuff
Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)
----- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 10:12 AM -----

	"Yaish, Yair (OGC)" <YYaish@exchange.ml.com>
	03/16/2001 09:59 AM

		 To: "'TeiglandL@sullcrom.com'" <TeiglandL@sullcrom.com>,
"'Janice.R.Moore@enron.com'" <Janice.R.Moore@enron.com>,
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "'lpeddic@alleghenyenergy.com'" <lpeddic@alleghenyenergy.com>,
"'GilbergD@sullcrom.com'" <GilbergD@sullcrom.com>, "'Ormec@sullcrom.com'"
<Ormec@sullcrom.com>
		 Subject: RE: Comments to Pgph 6 of ISDA

Sorry about not sending the attachment, here it is.

 <<AES.ENRO Side Letter -- YY  Comments.doc>>

Yair Yaish
Merrill Lynch (OGC)
212-449-2456
yyaish@exchange.ml.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yaish, Yair (OGC)
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 10:02 AM
> To: 'TeiglandL@sullcrom.com'; Janice.R.Moore@enron.com;
Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
> Cc: lpeddic@alleghenyenergy.com; GilbergD@sullcrom.com; Ormec@sullcrom.com
> Subject: Comments to Pgph 6 of ISDA
>
> Attached are my comments to the ISDA.
>
> Feel free to call me as soon as possible.  Thanks much!!
>
> Yair Yaish
> Merrill Lynch (OGC)
> 212-449-2456
> yyaish@exchange.ml.com
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: TeiglandL@sullcrom.com [SMTP:TeiglandL@sullcrom.com]
>  Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 12:57 AM
>  To: Janice.R.Moore@enron.com; Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
>  Cc: lpeddic@alleghenyenergy.com; YYaish@exchange.ml.com;
GilbergD@sullcrom.com; Ormec@sullcrom.com
>  Subject: Re-revised Allegheny Side Letter for ISDA
>
>  Sara/Janice, thanks for your comments.  I have reflected them in the
attached draft, marked to show your changes.  The governing law provision is
a formulation that we have used at S&C to accomplish the purpose of giving
effect to NY-GOL 5-1401 and should achieve the purpose of the language you
added to the power master amendment; I was planning to conform the latter to
the language used here unless you have an objection.
>
>  Allegheny has not yet reviewed this draft so it remains subject to their
comment.  I also need Yair to confirm that he is happy with the new Part 6 -
Commodity Definitions section (Yair, this is attached as Exhibit "C" to the
attached document).
>
>  Let me know if you have any further questions or comments.  Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ----------------------------------
>
>  This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
>  that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
>  intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
>  immediately.
>
>
>  ----------------------------------
>
>  This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
>  that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
>  intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
>  immediately.
>   << File: Allegheny  ENRON ISDA SIDE LETTER(vRED).DOC >>

 - AES.ENRO Side Letter -- YY  Comments.doc


Donna our scheduler for Southern Conn and Yankee says this guy had some.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
01/28/2000
04:19 PM ---------------------------

Donna Jones
01/26/2000 01:37 PM

To: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Re: 1/27 AGT volumes

Devin Gordan at Energy East has located supply for me for SCG, YGS,  and CNG.
Call him at 713-626-2426.

Brian Perrone
01/26/2000 12:35 PM

To: Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Donna Jones/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Re: 1/27 AGT volumes

Donna,

Please let me know if you hear of any capacity available for Feb-00 on Tenn
Z6.  If possible, we want to try to buy capacity or delivered gas past our
furthest delivery point on Tenn so you can back-haul your needs.

Brian

Marianne Stiles
01/26/2000 12:31 PM

To: Donna Jones/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: 1/27 AGT volumes

Just got off of the phone with Enron.   Due to the meter bounce that they are
doing because of the restriction, there will be a  reduction @ the gate (meter
#52) of 370 dth.   Donna, you originally requested 2050 dth, it will now be
1680 dth.   I have been told that you should see the entire 1680 dth.
Unfortunately, you will have to redo your Boston noms.

Here is the file

 - agt012000.xls


The house thing is a tough call.  It's hard to say.   If you're not in any
hurry to buy, the summer should give
you a good indication of continuing energy problems.  I personally think that
the problem will come and go
for a while, but a lot depends on how California's legislature deals with the
situation.  I have no idea what
they'll end up doing - they've acted pretty poorly already.

What's your time frame on a house?  If you're only concern is that prices are
at their highest level in the last
decade, I wouldn't worry too much about that.  It's impossible to time the
market -  who would've thought
San Francisco's housing prices would be at these current levels.   There are
also a lot of intangibles associated
with home ownership as your aware of.

I would be concerned about the energy situation, so just try to keep abreast
of it.  Also, you could call me if you
have any questions.  I'll try to help the best I can.  Take care and tell Kim
and Kendall I said hi.

Kevin

BriLowery@aol.com on 01/22/2001 10:48:39 PM
To: Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Everythings Big in Texas?

Chump!
This energy crisis is making me question  my timing on buying a house.  I'm
thinking if the economy tanks the housing prices will dip a little.  They
just crack the highs of 1989 this last two years.  Any opinions?

I start my Texas travel in February.  I'll be in Dallas for the first full
week and back in March in Dallas again.  Starting the end of March I'll be
there almost every week for about 6 months.  You'll be seeing more of me than
you want.  When we get closer to March I'll give you a buzz to set up some
dates.
Sorry about the Kendall picture, I'll try again.

Take care, B


That is fine.  Mom had said that you wanted me to go through Bob Dunn for my
mortgage.  Can you give more info?
-e

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 02/07/2001 11:05:26 AM
To: eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Good morning Son.I have a favor to ask. Next time  you are @ your bank,
please get $1000 cash, mostly 100's. I will give you a  check for same. Same
old problem. No local bank account. If this is a problem  let me know.
Thanks-Dad


FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fossum, Drew
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Horton, Stanley; Neubauer, Dave
Cc:	Lowry, Phil; Nelson, Mike; Craig, Rick; Miller, Mary Kay; Dietz, Rick; Blair, Lynn; Davis, Britt; Porter, Gregory J.; Dornan, Dari; Darveaux, Mary
Subject:	FW: OneOk Talking Points

	Stan, the Bushton Team met yesterday and decided that there is no value and substantial risk to Northern in accepting OneOk's suggestion that we rewrite the Bushton Measurement Agreement to operate like the OneOk-Kinder Morgan Scott City measurement agreement.  We are reluctant to incorporate the PTR formula in any way beyond the limited purpose it serves under the current Measurement Agreement.  The following are talking points that Dave Neubauer will use today in a conversation with Terry Spencer, who is Steve Winston's boss.  Since Winston's proposal (which I sent to you by email last week) was a draft and has never been formally sent to us, we decided that having Dave deliver our message to Terry made more sense than sending a letter or elevating the issue to your and John Gibson's level.  However, if Gibson calls you and raises the issue of their proposal, the following points contain our message.

	Spencer may agree in the call with Dave to reconcile the April and May imbalance based on our metered numbers.  If not, Britt has prepared a demand letter that can be sent at any time to get resolution of that issue rolling.  I believe that Gibson indicated that he'd be calling you back this week to talk about this matter, so your conversation should take place before we send the demand letter. I'll forward the demand letter for your review separately.

	On the other proposal from OneOk that I forwarded to you last week (relating to operational changes designed to allow OneOk to get the helium plant running again), we have made some minor modifications and are sending the counterproposal back to OneOk.  We expect to get that deal in place with them soon.  This is a good development for them, and with little or no risk to us, and should temper any disappointment they feel because of our rejection of their measurment proposal.

	Please give me a call if you have any questions or concerns.  Thanks. DF

1.  Steve Winston's suggested approach is similar to ONEOK's Scott City measurement agreement with Kinder Morgan.  It uses PTR as an alternative form of measurement that takes precedence over the primary meters if the variation between the PTR and the primary meters exceeds certain thresholds.  That structure is very different from the Northern-ONEOK Measurement Procedures Agreement, which, as reaffirmed by the arbitrators, does not make the numbers from Northern's ultrasonic meters subject to ONEOK's PTR numbers except in the very narrow circumstance of a "BTU measurement error" (i.e., when the chromatograph malfunctions).

2.  Northern is not willing to modify the existing agreement to elevate ONEOK's PTR to a status equal to the ultrasonic meters because the Oneok meters and processes within the plant have numerous deficiencies and do not conform to AGA quality specifications.  ONEOK's independent outside experts, Barnes and Click, confirmed this fact during the arbitration.

3.  ONEOK can currently use PTR, or any other means it wants, to determine whether to call a "special test" of the accuracy of Northern's ultrasonic meters pursuant to Section 2(e) of the Measurement ProceduresAgreement.  Upon calling a special test, any concerns ONEOK may have about the accuracy of the ultrasonic meters would be resolved by independent technical analysis of the meters.  ONEOK has not called for a special test, but can do so at any time if it believes the ultrasonic meters are malfunctioning.

4.  If ONEOK wants to renegotiate the Measurement Procedures Agreement to track the structure of the Scott City procedure, ONEOK must bring its measurement and processes within the Bushton Plant up to AGA quality specifications and provide for maintenance of those meters consistent with those specifications.

5.  The current imbalance at the Plant is about $1.2 million owed to ONEOK, based on Northern's meters.  The outstanding imbalance situation at the Plant, which dates to April and May of this year, must be resolved irrespective of what ONEOK desires to do going forward.  Since ONEOK has not called a special test of Northern's meters, the arbitration award mandates that the metered data govern the imbalance for those months.  If ONEOK does not agree to that reconciliation, Northern will be forced to pursue appropriate remedies.


The following schedule will be reinstated in Real Time:

Deal # 486140 - GAC BUY

Deal # 166518 - MIECO SALE

LLH - 22 MW

PATH:  BPA(G)SYS-GAC-BPA(T)SYS/SCL-EPMI-MIECO-AVISTA-SCL(L)SYS

AVISTA TAG#11868AA

Lisa


just let me know when you are leaving and I will meet you

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           12/21/2000 09:28 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: BOWL POOL 2000

probably around noon- or one

Eric Bass@ECT
12/21/2000 09:27 AM

To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: BOWL POOL 2000

when are you leaving?


Dear UT Team:

Thank you for all your time and help over the past several weeks.  Through
the interview process, we have chosen 38 Financial Analyst candidates to
bring to Super Saturday on November 4.  These candidates are:

Amanda Ostrander, Ali Ahmed, Bonnie Chang, Brad Morgan, Brad Staller, Brian
Falik, Brian Kanatzar, Bryan Willingham, Carol Stauch, Castlen Moore, Doug
Epperson, Chris Calato, Daniel Bates, Daniel Jenkins, David Eastlake, David
Michels, Hina Khan, Irfan Iqbal, James Lee, Jason Huang, Jay Raman, Judy
Maledon, Max Sell, Michael Morris, Natalie Madi, Natascha Seume, Paul Horng,
Ryan Ruebsahm, Ryan Williams, Sean Steele, Shaleen Miller, Stephen Dexter,
Tayyab Balagamwala, Ty Purdy, Lydia Kuo, Matt Linford, Lauren Szeto, and
Melanie Sandoval.

I have personally called each of the 38 candidates to let them know they have
been selected.  They will also receive a formal letter through the mail later
this week.  This letter will include details regarding November 4.

The interviews for the Tax Analyst position also yielded the following:
5 Spring Internship offers:  Ashley Berger, Yi (Zoe) Zhou, Li Li, Weijing
Shin, and Xuemei Lang
1 Summer Internship offer: Chia-Lin Lee
2 Full Time Office Visits: Andrew Susman and Amanda Ostrander

The next step is cultivation.  I will assign candidates to targeted team
members for telephone follow-up calls.  I would also like to have volunteers
to go to Austin next week to take these candidates to dinner.  Please let me
know if and when you will be available so that I can begin planning.

Thanks again for all your help and hard work!!!

lexi
3-4585


you are right.  you are one of a kind.  i am lucky to have you.  you are
buying some time past 50.  you just added another year or two (depends if i
have all my hair or not).


-----Original Message-----
From: "Brian Tracy" <brian@spectronenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent: Tue 12/18/2001 2:13 PM
To: Quigley, Dutch
Cc:
Subject: PRICE QUOTES

02/03  34.5/36

03/04  10.5/11.5

04/05  9/10

05/06  7.5/9

06/07  7.5/9

07/08  7.5/9

08/09  7.5/9

09/10  7.5/9


You're right. We cheated by trying to screw everyone who isn't fortunate
enough to work at Enron.

Give it a rest.  The order was determined by an impartial 3rd party.

LQCOLOMBO@aol.com on 07/12/2000 05:11:28 PM
To: Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Draft Order Determined

I"m not talking shit or anything, but i think its funny how the people you
said would be watching you got 4 of the top 5 picks.

Ramiro


Ken is fine with the memo.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:23 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth; Derrick Jr., James
Cc:	Rieker, Paula; Johnson, Kelly; Carter, Rebecca; Kean, Steven J.; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:	Employee Memo re: Corporate Secretary

Attached is a draft employee memo, which has been reviewed by both Rebecca and Paula.  Please review, and let me know if you have any comments or changes.

Thank you.
Karen

 << File: corpsectmemo.doc >>


Is this only available to the Legal Group?  There are a few people in Credit
and Global Contracts that might find this helpful.  Please add me to the
list.  Thanks!

	Sylvia Hu@ENRON
	07/13/2000 05:51 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie McMurray/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: (bcc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Westlaw Luncheon - Thursday, 7/27  at EB 47C2  12 - 1:30 PM

Westlaw has a new product - Westnews out on market in competing with Lexis'
Company Dossier on Lexsi-Nexis Universe.   You will have an opportunity to
learn Westnews from Michael Springler, Westlaw Attorney.  The presentation on
Westnews will be held at Conference Room EB47C2 on Thursday, from 12:00 noon
- 1:30 PM.  Lunch will be provided by Westlaw.  Please R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu
( x36775) or (email) by noon, 7/26.

Uncover relationships between people and businesses by searching Westnews and
public records on Westlaw.

Resources available include:
Company Profiles / People Finder / Asset locator
Corporate and Limited Partnership Records
Bankruptcy filings / UCC filings / Lawsuit filings
and more than 6,000 news and business publications,
including The Wall Street Journal.

Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775


I've been provided a bootleg copy of the results of the El Paso open season.  Here's the most interesting thing... El Paso waived its right of first refusal under the one year deal done last year, and participated with everyone else in the open season.  Accordingly, they were allocated capacity along with everyone else.  Remember, all these deals were [supposedly] done at EPNG's max rates.  There were approx. 30 successful bidders, and their bids were for various term lengths.  Here are the more significant awards:

Burlington-  7,000
CEG Energy Options-  37,800
Coral-  15,000
Duke-  212,000
Dynegy- 56,500
El Paso Merchant- 277,000
ENA-  254,000
MGI Supply (Pemex)- 38,000
Oxy-  19,000
PG&E (et al.)- 151,000
SMUD-  10,000
Sempra Trading-  6,500
SoCal- 19,000
Texaco-  58,500
Williams- 11,500

Here's the other EPNG news flash... apparently, EPNG is telling shippers to be on the lookout for an announcement next week of another open season to guage shippers interest in a major expansion of its system.  I'm assuming at this point this project will include the All American pipeline asset.

I'm also now told that the Kern River expansion may be much larger than what we were led to believe a couple of weeks ago.  We heard earlier that they were looking at doing a 500 MMcf/d expansion that would include the 124 MMcf/d expansion already sold.  New information suggests that the 500 MMcf/d expansion may be significantly understated, and volumes may approach 700 - 800 MMcf/d.  The expansion would include not only compression, but would involve additional pipe, and would not be rolled into existing rates, but would be an incrementally priced project.


print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000
02:34 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           10/03/2000 01:35 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: soft copy of august curve validation for liquids

Dear Jeff,

Here is a soft copy of the memo I gave you earlier.  Also, you were right
about Adam Groves - it should be Adam Gross.

Best regards

Shona


Sean,

I am sending this note to request that the correct counterparty name be confirmed on the 2 below puchase deals for Sep/01 production.  We are being invoiced by Coral Energy Canada Inc., whereas we have these deals in the system under Coral Energy Resources, L.P.  I cannot find executed confirmations on these deals.  Vladi Pimenov may be the trader or risk contact for these deals.  Please advise or change as necessary.

1036802
1063131

Thank you,
Scott Dozier
Client Services - Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
office: 713.345.7213
fax: 713.646.8420
email: scott.dozier@enron.com


I'm jealous - i can't go wednesday!   have an interview and that was the only time they could do it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dana R Richardson [mailto:drrichardson@cmsenergy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Hadix, Susan
Cc: Jennifer Lamprecht (E-mail); 'Macaul, Pam'; Tori Kuykendall (E-mail)
Subject: RE: REMINDER

I second Grotto - it's my favorite!!!

                    "Hadix, Susan"
                    <Susan.Hadix@e       To:     "'Macaul, Pam'" <Pam_Macaul@bmc.com>, "Dana Richardson (E-mail
                    lpaso.com>            2)" <drrichardson@cmsenergy.com>, "Jennifer Lamprecht (E-mail)"
                                          <jennifer_lamprecht@oxy.com>, "Tori Kuykendall (E-mail)"
                    11/12/2001            <tkuyken@enron.com>
                    02:24 PM             cc:
                                         Fax to:
                                         Subject:     RE: REMINDER

Well now that sucks...make me choose the place.  No bitching allowed then!
ha, ha

I was thinking America's but Jennifer is having lunch there today w/her
Mom.
We can shoot for that another time for sure.

Here are my suggestions:  Mi Luna, Fox Diner, Grotto

All are very good...I lean towards Grotto.  There's my 2 cents.

Let me hear what you all think.

-----Original Message-----
From: Macaul, Pam [mailto:Pam_Macaul@bmc.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Hadix, Susan; Dana Richardson (E-mail 2); Jennifer Lamprecht
(E-mail); Macaul, Pam; Tori Kuykendall (E-mail)
Subject: RE: REMINDER

Susan,

Since you want to make the reservations, why don't you go ahead and choose.
Someone else can pick next time and make the reservations.

Pam

-----Original Message-----
From: Hadix, Susan [mailto:Susan.Hadix@elpaso.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:05 PM
To: Dana Richardson (E-mail 2); Jennifer Lamprecht (E-mail); Pam Macaul
(E-mail); Tori Kuykendall (E-mail)
Subject: REMINDER

Hi everyone,

This is a reminder about dinner Wednesday night, November 14th.  Is
everyone
still available?  We should pick a spot and I will make reservations.  I
only ask we don't do BBQ.  I can't get excited about BBQ. ;-)

Thanks!

Susan A. Hadix, Senior Volume Analyst
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.
832/676-6955 phone
713/508-0525 pager
832/676-1898 fax
832/676-4999 after hours
Susan.Hadix@elpaso.com

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


I am deferring t this to you but I don't see any reason we would have any problem with this  either.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 5:25 PM
To:	Lawner, Leslie; Tholt, Jane M.; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry; Grigsby, Mike
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah
Subject:	FW: Motion To Convene Settlement Conference

FYI.  Obviously, we would want to participate in any settlement discussions.  Do you see any reason why we would not want to support the motion to establish the settlement procedure?  SRP indicates that the ongoing proceedings would not be delayed.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Joel Greene <jlgreene@energyadvocates.com <mailto:jlgreene@energyadvocates.com>>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Joel+20Greene+20+3Cjlgreene+40energyadvocates+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Joel+20Greene+20+3Cjlgreene+40energyadvocates+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	agold@coral-energy.com <mailto:agold@coral-energy.com>; amy.sheridan@williams.com <mailto:amy.sheridan@williams.com>; barryp@bp.com <mailto:barryp@bp.com>; bbrigham@sidrichgas.com <mailto:bbrigham@sidrichgas.com>; bealljp@texaco.com <mailto:bealljp@texaco.com>; bgray@cc.state.az.us <mailto:bgray@cc.state.az.us>; Bgray@EPElectric.com <mailto:Bgray@EPElectric.com>; bjost@huberlaw.com <mailto:bjost@huberlaw.com>; bruce.a.connell@usa.conoco.com <mailto:bruce.a.connell@usa.conoco.com>; bwhitta@pnm.com <mailto:bwhitta@pnm.com>; carla.j.johnson@usa.conoco.com <mailto:carla.j.johnson@usa.conoco.com>; carpentierd@dsmo.com <mailto:carpentierd@dsmo.com>; caschindler@hhlaw.com <mailto:caschindler@hhlaw.com>; catherine.palazzari@elpaso.com <mailto:catherine.palazzari@elpaso.com>; cbrechte@apsc.com <mailto:cbrechte@apsc.com>; cbulf@oneok.com <mailto:cbulf@oneok.com>; coganja@aol.com <mailto:coganja@aol.com>; craigc@calpine.com <mailto:craigc@calpine.com>; cynthiacorcoran@corcoran-law.com <mailto:cynthiacorcoran@corcoran-law.com>; daniel.collins@elpaso.com <mailto:daniel.collins@elpaso.com>; daswanstrom@verner.com <mailto:daswanstrom@verner.com>; Dave Huard Esq. (E-mail) (E-mail); dbmcvick@srpnet.com <mailto:dbmcvick@srpnet.com>; dfulton@enron.com <mailto:dfulton@enron.com>; dga@sloverandloftus.com <mailto:dga@sloverandloftus.com>; djohn@jhenergy.com <mailto:djohn@jhenergy.com>; dkirkla@pnm.com <mailto:dkirkla@pnm.com>; dlh@jmbm.com <mailto:dlh@jmbm.com>; dlsmith@pplweb.com <mailto:dlsmith@pplweb.com>; dmcwash@mshpc.com <mailto:dmcwash@mshpc.com>; douglas.porter@sce.com <mailto:douglas.porter@sce.com>; dtom@btuwatch.com <mailto:dtom@btuwatch.com>; Dwilliams@kmg.com <mailto:Dwilliams@kmg.com>; earo@dynegy.com <mailto:earo@dynegy.com>; edward.mcmurtrie@swgas.com <mailto:edward.mcmurtrie@swgas.com>; elizabeth.herdes@elpaso.com <mailto:elizabeth.herdes@elpaso.com>; emyerskerbal@shb.com <mailto:emyerskerbal@shb.com>; Fritz Kolb (E-mail); frl3@pge.com <mailto:frl3@pge.com>; gbaker@sempra.com <mailto:gbaker@sempra.com>; gcvenz@duke-energy.com <mailto:gcvenz@duke-energy.com>; gduede@apsc.com <mailto:gduede@apsc.com>; glander@skippingstone.com <mailto:glander@skippingstone.com>; gsmith@jhenergy.com <mailto:gsmith@jhenergy.com>; haorndorff@aeraenergy.com <mailto:haorndorff@aeraenergy.com>; jab@cpuc.ca.gov <mailto:jab@cpuc.ca.gov>; jalward@cc.state.az.us <mailto:jalward@cc.state.az.us>; james.trifon@southernenergy.com <mailto:james.trifon@southernenergy.com>; Tholt, Jane M.; jay.golub@bakerbotts.com <mailto:jay.golub@bakerbotts.com>; jcashin@epsa.org <mailto:jcashin@epsa.org>; jdoering@rcgroup.com <mailto:jdoering@rcgroup.com>; jeff.goforth@williams.com <mailto:jeff.goforth@williams.com>; jerry.strange@elpaso.com <mailto:jerry.strange@elpaso.com>; jgregg@mbolaw.com <mailto:jgregg@mbolaw.com>; jhmcgrew@brudergentile.com <mailto:jhmcgrew@brudergentile.com>; jima@pandaenergy.com <mailto:jima@pandaenergy.com>; jmoriarty@fw-law.com <mailto:jmoriarty@fw-law.com>; Joel Greene; Joseph Koury (E-mail); jpa3@pge.com <mailto:jpa3@pge.com>; jparker@govmail.state.nv.us <mailto:jparker@govmail.state.nv.us>; jpfloom@gkrse-law.com <mailto:jpfloom@gkrse-law.com>; jpnevins@hhlaw.com <mailto:jpnevins@hhlaw.com>; jrlilyestrom@hhlaw.com <mailto:jrlilyestrom@hhlaw.com>; jrogers@btuwatch.com <mailto:jrogers@btuwatch.com>; jstaffier@sdsatty.com <mailto:jstaffier@sdsatty.com>; jsuwara@sempra.com <mailto:jsuwara@sempra.com>; judy.heineman@elpaso.com <mailto:judy.heineman@elpaso.com>; kadaly@moheck.com <mailto:kadaly@moheck.com>; kaprice@srpnet.com <mailto:kaprice@srpnet.com>; karilee.ramaley@pinnaclewest.com <mailto:karilee.ramaley@pinnaclewest.com>; kathleen.royal@elpaso.com <mailto:kathleen.royal@elpaso.com>; kbedwards@gkrse-law.com <mailto:kbedwards@gkrse-law.com>; kbosley@reliant.com <mailto:kbosley@reliant.com>; kclark@jhenergy.com <mailto:kclark@jhenergy.com>; kkrieger@columbiaenergygroup.com <mailto:kkrieger@columbiaenergygroup.com>; klm@dwgp.com <mailto:klm@dwgp.com>; larry.black@swgas.com <mailto:larry.black@swgas.com>; lhamilto@utilicorp.com <mailto:lhamilto@utilicorp.com>; lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com <mailto:lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com>; lpadilla@gas.pemex.com <mailto:lpadilla@gas.pemex.com>; lwsmith@midcogen.com <mailto:lwsmith@midcogen.com>; mark.cook@elpaso.com <mailto:mark.cook@elpaso.com>; mark.minich@elpaso.com <mailto:mark.minich@elpaso.com>; mcregar@aeglobalmarkets.com <mailto:mcregar@aeglobalmarkets.com>; melissa.maxwell@bakerbotts.com <mailto:melissa.maxwell@bakerbotts.com>; mfenton@pnm.com <mailto:mfenton@pnm.com>; Michael McElrath (E-mail); mike.langston@southernunionco.com <mailto:mike.langston@southernunionco.com>; millertr@bp.com <mailto:millertr@bp.com>; mmexal@giant.com <mailto:mmexal@giant.com>; napedersen@jonesday.com <mailto:napedersen@jonesday.com>; Norm Walker; Pat Anderson (E-mail); patricia.shelton@elpaso.com <mailto:patricia.shelton@elpaso.com>; paul.gendron@neg.pge.com <mailto:paul.gendron@neg.pge.com>; pcervin@br-inc.com <mailto:pcervin@br-inc.com>; pckissel@gkrse-law.com <mailto:pckissel@gkrse-law.com>; pete.frost@usa.conoco.com <mailto:pete.frost@usa.conoco.com>; pkeeler@br-inc.com <mailto:pkeeler@br-inc.com>; pmohler@hewm.com <mailto:pmohler@hewm.com>; pserrano@epelectric.com <mailto:pserrano@epelectric.com>; racosta@epelectric.com <mailto:racosta@epelectric.com>; rcashdollar@apachenitro.com <mailto:rcashdollar@apachenitro.com>; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; redavis@sempra.com <mailto:redavis@sempra.com>; rhewlett@aepnet.org <mailto:rhewlett@aepnet.org>; richard.derryberry@elpaso.com <mailto:richard.derryberry@elpaso.com>; robert.tomlinson@elpaso.com <mailto:robert.tomlinson@elpaso.com>; rosa.jackson@elpaso.com <mailto:rosa.jackson@elpaso.com>; rpetti@ladwp.com <mailto:rpetti@ladwp.com>; rrich@bracepatt.com <mailto:rrich@bracepatt.com>; salleyoo@dwt.com <mailto:salleyoo@dwt.com>; sally.turley@elpaso.com <mailto:sally.turley@elpaso.com>; sandrar@prestongates.com <mailto:sandrar@prestongates.com>; sarah.tomalty@dynegy.com <mailto:sarah.tomalty@dynegy.com>; sbreen@czn.com <mailto:sbreen@czn.com>; Scott Walton; semertz@aep.com <mailto:semertz@aep.com>; sjf@cpuc.ca.gov <mailto:sjf@cpuc.ca.gov>; sjroyka@columbiaenergygroup.com <mailto:sjroyka@columbiaenergygroup.com>; slevine@brattle.com <mailto:slevine@brattle.com>; Susan Ginsberg; susan.jones@neg.pge.com <mailto:susan.jones@neg.pge.com>; tarpeysp@bp.com <mailto:tarpeysp@bp.com>; tcarlson@apsc.com <mailto:tcarlson@apsc.com>; tcubbage@cov.com <mailto:tcubbage@cov.com>; tdickers@westerngas.com <mailto:tdickers@westerngas.com>; vrspurg@ppco.com <mailto:vrspurg@ppco.com>; william.healy@elpaso.com <mailto:william.healy@elpaso.com>; wlansinger@sempra.com <mailto:wlansinger@sempra.com>
Subject:	Motion To Convene Settlement Conference

Attached is a draft motion of Salt River Project to establish a date certain
for convening a settlement conference under Rule 602, in accordance with the
settlement package distributed on July 30. Paragraph 8 of the motion will
list all parties that are in support of this procedural motion.  A company's
support for the motion IN NO WAY reflects any agreement to support any
setttlement proposal.  It merely indicates a desire to initiate a parallel
settlement path without interfering with or delaying FERC's processing of
the ongoing proceedings. Please reply to all by COB Tuesday in advising
whether your company would like to be listed.  We intend to file on
Wednesday early afternoon.  Thank you.

Energy Advocates LLP
202-371-9889
202-371-9025 (fax)
jlgreene@energyadvocates.com <mailto:jlgreene@energyadvocates.com>
 <<rp00-336setmot1.doc>>

 - rp00-336setmot1.doc << File: rp00-336setmot1.doc >>


This is to advise you that we will NOT have ETS Monday morning staff meetings
on December 18 or December 25.

Please make note that the next ETS Staff Meeting will be held on Tuesday,
January 2, 2001 at 9:30AM in 49C2.   And then on January 8, we'll resume our
regular schedule of having our staff meetings on Monday mornings at 9:15AM.

Regards and Happy Holidays,
Cindy
X36197


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kenneth G Gruhl" <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kenneth+20G+20Gruhl+22+20+3Ckggruhl+40duke-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Sunday, September 09, 2001 1:34 PM
To:	Mulligan, Amy; Allen K Nielsen; blreese@duke-energy.com; Beck Mayberry; wralkema@pplmt.com; Christopher S Smart; dacluff@duke-energy.com; dlsmith@pplweb.com; dtedesco@duke-energy.com; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Darren Stephens; David Bowers; David P Pell; George X Ouzounian; jjbischoff@pplweb.com; jmtaggart@duke-energy.com; jpritchard@citlink.net; James Stebbins; kglenny@duke-energy.com; Kim White; mschneider@duke-energy.com; Michael Kerr; Michael Wells; rjnewson@duke-energy.com; rspear@pplmt.com; Sherry Davis; Steven Fliflet; Steven Fliflet; Ted Romo; Todd Hendricks; Tom Carlson; Tyler J Kristensen; ajreiter@duke-energy.com; kggruhl@duke-energy.com; pattersondw@bv.com; swansondj@bv.com; trading@pplmt.com
Subject:	Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Monday Sept. 10, HE 8:00 AM to Tuesday Sept. 11, HE 7:00

Preparation for startup on Monday night.  Will be lighting the Aux. Boiler
only to warm up the HRSG's.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic14893.pcx)
 - pic14893.pcx


The attached Exhibit represents our understanding of the above referenced
transaction which you and Bill Brown verbally agreed to.

If this accurately reflects your understanding of the transaction, please
print out two copies, execute, and return both to oour office.? We will then
have them executed by Tom Armstrong (VP/Gas Resources & Energy Services), and
return an original for your files.

If you have any questions regarding this transmission, please don't hesitate
to contact Bill Brown at 702-876-7136, or william.brown@swgas.com.

Thank you.
 - ENRN00-2.EXH.wpd


============================================================
Larry King Live at 9:00 p.m. ET
on Monday, January 7, 2002
============================================================
Tonight: In an exclusive primetime interview, the parents
of the first U.S. casualty from hostile fire in Afghanistan,
Wilbur and Lynn Chapman, join Larry to remember
their son. Sgt. 1st Class Nathan Chapman, 31, was
killed by small-arms fire in Afghanistan on Friday.

And in another primetime exclusive, Robin Reid, the
father of  "shoe bomb" suspect Richard Reid, joins
Larry live from London.  Richard Reid, 28, is suspected
of trying to ignite plastic explosives in his shoes aboard
a U.S.-bound commercial airplane last month.

Other guests on tonight's program include Sens. Richard
Lugar, R-Ind., and Pete Domenici, R-N.M., and former Sen.
Sam Nunn.  Plus, we'll get a live report from the frontlines
in Afghanistan and we're taking your calls.

See you tonight at 9 Eastern!

Visit http://www.cnn.com/larryking and send us your show ideas.
=============================================================
=============================================================
To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE to any CNN EMAIL service visit:
http://cnn.com/EMAIL

Read our privacy guidelines at:
http://cnn.com/privacy.html

(c) 2002 Cable News Network, Inc.
A Time Warner Company
All Rights Reserved.

======================================================
To unsubscribe, click here:
http://cgi.cnn.com/cgi-bin/mail/clik?email=kenneth.lay@enron.com&list=larryking
This message was sent to you at kenneth.lay@enron.com


Gerald,

Can I bring a copy of the Stagecoach LOI on Enron letterhead to you for your
signature?  Chris Hilgert said that we need your initials or signature,
including Jean Mrha,s.  Where on the document would you sign or initial?  I
would like to get this out to El Paso today.

Thanks,

John


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************
Get a complimentary premiere SourceBook Weekly Issue at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
Not just news; analysis.
************************************************************************
Miss last week? Catch up on the latest analyses of the energy industry
at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssuesWatch
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, December 11, 2000
San Francisco Muni Attempt Poses Additional Challenge for PG&E
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

Backers of a plan to create a publicly owned power system in San Francisco
and Brisbane, Calif., got a financial boost recently with a panel approving
$754,250 in taxpayer money to study public power and related issues. Most
of the money will be used to study how the proposed municipality district
would work and how it would be financed. The Board of Supervisors Finance
Committee approved the spending, but put $400,000 of the money on reserve,
pending the selection of contractors to perform the study and determine
the scope of the work.

ANALYSIS: This news item circulated about two weeks ago, but it still deserves
attention as this could have tremendous impact on PG&E. The announcement
of the municipalization study comes at arguably the worst possible time
for PG&E as the utility already faces a multitude of financial and public
relations problems. Yet, in fact, the issue has been developing for several
months. Back in July, supporters of municipalization in PG&E's service
territory turned in a petition with 23,500 signatures calling for the creation
of a municipal utility district (meaning that electric service would be
provided by a city rather than an investor-owned utility).

First, let me provide some brief context regarding PG&E's current condition.
The utility is in debt of over $3 billion due to uncollected fees related
to the price spikes of last summer. PG&E's objective is to bill its customers
for this debt, and toward that end has petitioned to raise its rates with
the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).  Under PG&E's plan,
average residential monthly bills reportedly would increase from about
$54.50 to $63.50 on Jan. 1. Naturally, consumer activist groups such as
TURN that carefully monitor PG&E's every move have contested the rate
increase,
arguing that the utility alone is responsible for the debt it currently
faces. Since it is uncertain if the CPUC will grant PG&E's petition,
speculation
that the utility will become financially insolvent has begun to grow.

Both San Francisco and the smaller city of Brisbane to the south are included
in the study because municipalization must include two separate cities
in order to take effect. If municipalization is ultimately approved, these
two cities would form a new district and elect directors who would then
attempt to purchase PG&E's power grid in the area.

Proponents of the muni bypass effort say that the cities can provide less
expensive power to customers than PG&E, as the utility must pay dividends
to stockholders and compensate well-paid executives. PG&E has already started
damage control in response to the study, arguing against the formation
of a municipal utilities district. First, the utility has said simply that
it is not for sale, but more importantly it is PG&E's contention that
customers
would not necessarily save money if the cities in question were to
municipalize
their electric districts. In addition, PG&E says the cost for the cities
to buy its assets*necessary power plants, utility lines and other
infrastructure*would
run about $1 billion, which in fact would make the project more expensive
in the long run for customers.

Consumer activist Harvey Rosenfield is spearheading the municipalization
effort and is using the problems in San Diego as a means to support his
case. His name may sound familiar, as Rosenfield has been involved in many
seemingly anti-investor owned utility (IOU) measures in California. Back
in 1998, Rosenfield led the fight for Proposition 9, which would have
essentially
put a screeching halt on deregulation in the state. Although Prop. 9 was
ultimately defeated at the ballot, had it passed the measure would have
stopped the three California IOUs from charging customers for the costs
associated with $6 billion in bonds they had sold to pay for the 10-percent
rate cut that customers began receiving in January 1998. Prop. 9 would
have blocked the utilities from recouping any of their stranded costs,
which of course SDG&E has now accomplished and reportedly the other IOUs
(SCE and PG&E) are close to doing so as well. Rosenfield was a key participant
in Californians Against Utility Taxes (CUT), which lobbied repeatedly for
electric rates to be reduced by 20 percent for small consumers (as opposed
to the 10 percent that was included in the state's restructuring bill).

Along with this study related to specific cities, there reportedly is a
simultaneous movement from Governor Gray Davis for a state takeover of
the power transmission grid, power plants and government-sponsored
construction
of new generating plants. In early December, an internal memo was leaked
indicating that the governor was considering these measures as a response
to the tight supplies and high prices seen in San Diego last summer. Included
in the plan would be a restructuring of the state's power system wherein
the grid of transmission lines and power plants would be placed under state
control. Among several points on which PG&E and the governor disagree,
Davis has proposed an extended rate freeze for customers of all of the
three state's IOUs. While PG&E is pushing for a rate increase, California's
highest official reportedly would implement an indefinite rate freeze that
would further complicate PG&E's plan to pull itself out of debt.

Municipalization attempts in cities across the United States have increased
over the last two decades. Just last week, the city of Hermiston, Ore.,
was granted the right to acquire, by condemnation, the distribution facilities
that Pacific Power uses to serve parts of the municipality. The Umatilla
County Circuit Court has upheld the city of Hermiston's right to acquire,
by condemnation, the distribution facilities Pacific Power uses to serve
parts of the municipality. The city has been trying to acquire those
facilities
since 1998, with the intent of forming its own utility to serve the 4,000
commercial and residential customers now served by Pacific Power. Of course,
even though this is a significant ruling, it will remain embroiled in court
for some time. A jury trial to set the dollar amount of compensation for
Pacific Power's facilities won't start until March 12, 2001. Other
well-publicized
municipalization attempts have taken place in Lakewood, N.Y. (failed) and
a number of cities across Florida.

However, despite the rise in muni bypass efforts, the fact remains that
no contested municipalization effort of any significant size has been
successful
since the one that occurred in Massena, N.Y. back in 1982. At that time,
the city of Massena offered low-cost hydropower and tax-free financing,
which made the municipalization attempt beneficial to citizens. Today,
cities rarely can offer such advantages, which had made it difficult for
muni bypass efforts to succeed. Statistics show that, when given the option
to develop a city-run electric system by dissolving the incumbent utility's
authority, citizens across the country have chosen to retain the IOU model.
Of course, arguments could be made that in such cases the IOU lobbying
force has been a formidable component, wielding the capital necessary to
wage a successful campaign to protect its business. Yet, at the same time,
a case can be made that the benefits of municipalization just have not
been proven and that explains why citizens generally have opted to retain
the IOU model.

There is both good and bad news for PG&E related to this particular study.
The bad news is that studies such as these most often recommend
municipalization,
which makes it very difficult for local politicians to resist a takeover.
In other words, because the wheels have started turning toward
municipalization
in the area, it is more than likely that PG&E will have to engage in a
battle to preserve its business. Even though past history shows the attempt
probably would not be successful if PG&E contests it, the bypass effort
would result in PG&E spending a lot of money and time to fight the effort.

The good news is that time is on the utility's side. Municipalization is
usually a long and involved process. The fact that the Finance Committee
gave the green light to proceed with the study is only the first in many
regulatory checkpoints. The next steps are the full board's consideration
of the funding request for the study, and subsequently a decision whether
or not to put municipalization on the local ballot. Then the hard campaigning
would begin to sway public opinion one way or the other. Thus, even if
muncipalization of the two cities were to occur, PG&E still has some time
to potentially resolve its debt situation and construct a strong opposition
to the muni attempt.

However, from a public relations standpoint, this is just the last thing
that PG&E needs at this point. The utility continues to spin media coverage
to convey that it is only trying to recoup a debt that it accrued on behalf
of its obligation to serve customers. Adversaries such as TURN and Harvey
Rosenfield, however, are just as aggressively working to convince the public
that PG&E is trying to unfairly stick customers with a $3 billion tab.
To now have discussions emerge about whether or not city government could
more effectively provide electric service is another fire that PG&E will
have to extinguish if it wants to remain operational.
===============================================================
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert and SourceBook Weekly should
be sent to wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

*********************************************************************
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
at nspring@scientech.com or (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are
also available on our website.
*********************************************************************

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "delete" in the subject line.


What is expected for the Tuesday bid? I would guess the most critical from a
timing perspective will be a response centered on price and
commercial/technical issues. Michael indicates below he would like a
timetable for internal approvals to a closing. Do we have any indication how
pressed he is to close and fund versus agreeing on economic terms quickly and
allowing us to review the form of contract to ensure compliance with
accounting and finance guidlelines along the lines of our discussion earlier
this week? Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:59 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann
Cc: Booth, Chris; Rose, Steven; Virgo, Robert; Duran, W. David
Subject: FW: GE Turbines

All:

FYI, tomorrow I should receive turbine contracts for the 3 GE 7FAs being sold
by Site. Please see the e-mail below from Sithe's advisor regarding the
transaction schedule. Kay and I plan to initially review the contract, and I
have a technical team (Booth / Rose) ready to review the contracts as well.

From an accounting / finance perspective, I am interested in how we should
proceed given the circumstances. Kay and my initial plan is to review the
contracts from a technical / legal / commercial perspective and submit a
revised indicative number by Tuesday in consultation with Duran. Between now
and then, it would be helpful to know from accounting / finance how we should
proceed given that we are in a bidding situation (with I'm told three other
bidders). Herman / Rose / Lisa - please let me know your thoughts on this.

Chip - I would like Chris Booth to work with you on putting a draft DASH
together.

In the meantime, I will forward turbine contracts to everyone as soon as I
receive them.

Regards,

Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From:  MKolman@rcgroup.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-MKolman+40rcgroup+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: GE Turbines

Ben:

Per our conversation today, the turbine contract and LTSA are being sent
via Fed Ex to your office in Houston.

Final bids are due next Tuesday, June 5th via fax to 781-270-0055.  Bids
should include best price and a closing schedule (date by which bidder will
have all internal approvals necessary to enter into a binding agreement
with Seller subject only to consent from GE).

Thanks again for you patience and please call me if you have any questions,

Michael

================
Michael A. Kolman
Principal
Navigant Capital
(781) 564-9774 (direct)


http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/inside_game/ivan_maisel/news/2001/03/06/maise
l_insider/