---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
06:35 PM ---------------------------

Mandy MacKinnon
02/24/2000 03:10 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Koch Midstream Services

FYI,  I was watching the position manager for ENA and noticed some business
transactions on this pipeline.  This pipeline was bought by Duke Energy Field
Services effective 8/1/99.  All HPLC transactions were moved to that pipe at
that time.  The CES transactions that are current on this pipe should be
moved to Duke Energy Field Services.  I believe the pipe was renamed when
they bought it back in June or July.

If you have any questions, or want to verify this information, I would check
with the Global contracts dept.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001 10:59 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	04/04/2001 08:51 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Davis Press Conference

As you may have heard, Governor Davis intends to hold a press conference
Thursday evening at 6:05 PST to deliver "an important live address on energy
... will speak in detail about California's energy emergency and make an
important announcement." ?He has requested five minutes during evening
newscasts to make his remarks.

While there is no way to know specifics, we've heard rumor that his remarks
will include the following:

1. Discussion of rate increases
2. State's conservation efforts
3. Blame FERC for crisis
4. Point out what a great job he is doing

IEP is prepared to react immediately to the Governor's remarks if needed. ?

Below are two Dow Jones stories on the press conference, and a memo that was
released by Davis' top financial adviser, Joe Fichera.

We'll keep you posted -- but please alert me or Katie if you hear anything.

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

Calif Gov To Make 'Important' Energy Announcement Thurs  ????
Updated: Wednesday, April 4, 2001 08:17 AM?ET ????
?
(This article was originally published Wednesday)

By Jason Leopold

OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--In a highly unusual move, California Gov. Gray Davis
Tuesday requested radio and television stations in the state to clear five
minutes of time Thursday evening so he can make an important announcement
regarding the state's energy crisis.

Davis is expected to deliver a speech at 6:05 p.m. PST and will likely talk
about the state's conservation efforts, a 4,000 megawatt shortfall expected
next month, the need to bring new generation online, recent rate hikes
ordered by the California Public Utilities Commission, and the possibility
for further rate increases this summer to keep the state's three
investor-owned utilities solvent, sources close to Davis told Dow Jones
Newswires.

The source said Davis is not expected to discuss a final agreement to buy the
power lines owned by PG&E Corp. (PCG, news, msgs), unit Pacific Gas &
Electric, Edison International's (EIX, news, msgs) unit, Southern California
Edison, and Sempra Energy's (SRE, news, msgs) unit, San Diego Gas & Electric.

Davis' press secretary, Steve Maviglio, would not comment on Davis' speech.

In a memo to the media, Davis' office said the governor will "deliver an
important live address on energy from his office in Sacramento. During this
historic address to the people of California, the governor will speak in
detail about California's energy emergency and make an important
announcement."

The last time a California governor interrupted a broadcast schedules was in
1992, when Republican Gov. Pete Wilson delivered a speech about the state's
budget problems, a spokesman in Davis' office said.

But Davis' staff said "this is the first time in recent memory that a
Governor has asked for time statewide to deliver a live address to the people
of California."

-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com

Calif Gov Staff To Speak To Analysts About Energy Crisis ?? ??
Updated: Wednesday, April 4, 2001 05:37 PM?ET ???
?
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--California Gov. Gray Davis' advisers will speak to
Wall Street analysts Thursday following a live state address on the state's
energy crisis, according to an email sent to the financial community and
obtained by Dow Jones Newswires.

Daivs' staff, in a highly unusual move, asked radio and television
broadcasters to clear five minutes of air time Thursday night so Davis can
make an "important announcement" about the state's months-long energy crisis.

Sources close to the governor said Davis will discuss the state's
conservation efforts, a 4,000 megawatt supply shortfall expected this summer,
recent rate increases ordered by state regulators and the possibility for
further rate increases to replenish the state's budget surplus.

Davis is expected to discuss plans for keeping the state's three
investor-owned utilities, PG&E Corp. (PCG, news, msgs) unit Pacific Gas &
Electric, Edison International (EIX, news, msgs) unit Southern California
Edison and Sempra Energy (SRE, news, msgs) unit San Diego Gas & Electric,
solvent but he isn't expected to discuss a proposal to buy the utilities'
power lines.

Davis spokesman, Steve Maviglio, said he couldn't comment on the governor's
speech. He said, however, Davis has received the financial data regarding the
state's spending on wholesale electricity and what it expects to spend in the
months ahead.

In the email sent to Wall Street analysts, Davis' top financial adviser, Joe
Fichera, said the governor's advisers will hold a conference call at 9:45
p.m. EDT (0145 GMT) with analysts followed by a question-and-answer session.

Regarding Davis' speech Thursday, Fichera wrote in his email that "while
everyone will wish to speculate on what (Davis) will or will not say, I can
point out that the governor has been consistent in his goals to achieve:
significant demand side management, increased generation supply and
restoration of the financial health of the investor-owned utilities.

"All three components are important elements to resolving the energy
situation in California and will be addressed by the governor," Fichera wrote
in the email.

In addition, "it may go without saying, but the situation in California
involves many moving parts, many constituencies and independent players that
need to be brought together to resolve a problem that is of a size and scope
that no one anticipated," Fichera's email says.

"It certainly appears confusing and chaotic. The governor and his team
recognize the complexity of the problem and are rigorously attempting to move
the process to closure," the email says. "He is addressing all open issues so
that consumers, investors and others can achieve some certainty and move on.
We cannot make all the moving parts stop, nevertheless, the governor will
provide the leadership needed for a resolution."

-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com ????? ???

To: Members of the Financial Community
>
> Governor Gray Davis will make an important announcement about the energy
> crisis in California on Thursday at 6:05 PM PST.
>
> There will be a Financial Analyst conference call/presentation/Q&A with
> the Governor's advisors at 6:45 pm PST/9:45 pm EST. ?Details about the
> call-in number etc. will follow.
>
> While everyone will wish to speculate on what he will or will not say, I
> can point out that the Governor has been consistent in his goals to
> achieve:
> ?
> 1) significant demand side management (which reduces the State's need for
> expensive power and influences the spot market for power ),
> 2) increased generation supply (to provide reliability and stable prices)
> and
> 3) restoration of the financial health of the investor-owned utilities.
>
> All three components are important elements to resolving the energy
> situation in California and will be addressed by the Governor.
>
> It may go without saying but the situation in California involves many
> moving parts, many constituencies and independent players that need to be
> brought together to resolve a problem that is of a size and scope that no
> one anticipated. ?It certainly appears confusing and chaotic. ?The
> Governor and his team recognize the complexity of the problem and are
> rigorously attempting to move the process to closure. ?He is addressing
> all open issues so that consumers, investors and others can achieve some
> certainty and move on. ?We cannot make all the moving parts stop
> nevertheless, the Governor will provide the leadership needed for a
> resolution. ?
>
> We look forward to speaking with you tomorrow after the Governor's
> address.
>
> In the meantime, if you would like to speak to me or have any other
> questions, contact me at the numbers below.
>
> J
>
> Joseph S. Fichera
> Senior Managing Director & CEO
> Saber Partners, LLC
>
> Banker-Advisor
> Office of Governor Gray Davis
> State of California
> Sacramento, CA ?
>
> Tel: 916-324-3628
> Cel: 917-862-0619
>

 - Action Items


Your help in announcing this unique new product would be
greatly appreciated.     John

"PGS Energy Training Announces Breakthrough New Training
Product for Energy Derivatives and Electricity Trading."

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 John Adamiak
PGS Energy Training
412-279-9298
www.seminars-on-demand.com
john@pgsenergy.com

 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania - October 10, 2001 - PGS Energy Training
announced today the official release of its innovative new training product
Seminars-on-Demand (version 2.1) for the energy and electric power
industries.

Seminars-on-Demand is a completely new way to train employees in the
critical subject areas of energy derivatives, electricity trading, and
proper
deal structuring techniques. It eliminates the time and distance constraints
that frequently preclude live classroom training and enables employees to
increase their value in a cost-effective and time-efficient manner.
http://www.seminars-on-demand.com/whatis.html

"In today's marketplace, a well-trained staff is a firm's most powerful
strategic weapon. This new product finally allows a company to deliver
training across the entire organization in a cost-effective and timely
manner", said PGS Energy Training CEO John Adamiak.

Seminars-on-Demand works by combining an innovative CD-ROM
seminar presentation with a matching instructional manual and phone-based
instructor/student interaction.  Two-week, annual and unlimited corporate
enterprise licenses are available.

Free Preview CDs are available by calling 412-279-9298, visiting
www.seminars-on-demand.com, or by visiting the PGS Energy Training
booth at PowerMart in Houston next week.

Established in 1990, PGS Energy Training delivers in-depth training programs
in energy derivatives, electricity trading and gas-to-electricity arbitrage.
In addition to its new Seminars-on-Demand CD-ROM based training, PGS
Energy Training offers on-site classroom programs, open registration public
seminars and confidential training for senior executives.

 PGS ENERGY TRAINING
600 North Bell Avenue,  Carnegie Office Park  Bldg. 2, Suite 2708
Carnegie, PA 15106
Phone: 412-279-9298     Fax: 412-276-4676

 www.seminars-on-demand.com


These lists could change before the new company opens for business.

Execute for all gas products, read only for power and access to stack manager:
Hunter Shively
Geof Storey
Kevin Ruscitti
Martin Cuilla
Andy Lewis
Jason Williams
Jim Simpson

Read only for all gas and power products:
Laura Luce
Patrice Thurston
Bryant Frihart
Russell Murrell

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sever, Stephanie
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Martin, Thomas A.; Neal, Scott; Shively, Hunter S.
Cc:	Lees, Lisa; Denny, Jennifer
Subject:	New Company - Online Trader Access (Stack Manager & Website)

Please populate the attached worksheets for Stack Manager & Website Access.  I have added the Gas product types and a drop down for each user/product type  to populate with READ, EXECUTE or NONE.  For READ ONLY Website ID's, additional population is NOT necessary.  Please add or remove names as necessary and return to me once complete.  Let me know if you have any questions.

 << File: US Gas Stack & Website for New Version 121401.xls >>
Thank you,

Stephanie Sever
EnronOnline
713-853-3465


Our schedule for the May 4th meeting has changed a bit, so please plan your
travel schedules accordingly.  You will receive an agenda for the meeting
early next week.

Friday, May 4, 2001
8:00 am - 9:30 am
Campaign Leadership Meeting
Breakfast for this group will be served
Attendees:
Rick Shapiro
Mark Palmer
Jim Steffes
Janel Guerrero
Paul Kaufman

10:00 am - 12:00 pm
Leadership/California/Western States Meeting
Rick Shapiro
Mark Palmer
Jim Steffes
Janel Guerrero
Karen Denne
Paul Kaufman
Sue Mara
Jeff Dasovich
Sandi McCubbin
Hedy Govener
Scott Govenar
Bev Hansen
Ken Smith
Rich Lichtenstein
Sandra Yamane
Joan Kradin
Susan Landwehr
Jennifer Thome
Leslie Lawner
Mary Schoen
Marc Racicot*


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for GSTRF  follows from EquityAlert.com.     TheSUBWAY.com Announces Investment Opinion: Falling Interest Rates Improve Income?   WESTON, Fla., Oct 29, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Monday's stock market standouts include Globalstar, (Nasdaq:GSTRF), TheSubway.com's premarket pick for Monday, up 121% on new business news, Ariad Pharmaceuticals Inc., (Nasdaq: ARIA), up 39% on discovery of new drug, TRSG Corp., (OTCBB:TSGO), up 83% on new product line, eConnect (OTCBB:ECNC), up 48% on 26 million shares, and Verado Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq:VRDO), up 23% on business unit sale.   "In short, analysts say that falling interest rates improve the incomes of those still employed, which can help prop up the world's largest economy even as job losses climb. So, rising unemployment may not necessarily mean a subsequent drop in consumer demand. Still, investors are mired in the uncertainty of the times, keeping volatility in the financial markets at an excessive level." Stated Peter Antipatis. More available at http://www.TheSUBWAY.com   All material herein was prepared by Capital Research Group, Inc. (CRG) based upon information supplied by the company or other sources believed to be reliable. The information contained herein is not guaranteed by CRG to be accurate, and should not be considered to be all-inclusive. The companies that are discussed in this opinion have not approved the statements made in this opinion. This opinion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. A company's actual results could differ materially from those described in any forward-looking statements or announcements discussed herein. This material is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. CRG is not a licensed broker, broker dealer, market marker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. Please consult a broker before purchasing or selling any securities viewed on www.thesubway.com or mentioned herein.. CRG has not been compensated by any companies mentioned herein. CRG's affiliates, officers, directors and employees may also have bought or may buy the shares discussed in this opinion and may profit in the event those shares rise in value. CRG will not advise as to when it decides to sell and does not and will not offer any opinion as to when others should sell; each investor must make that decision based on his or her judgment of the market.   CONTACT:          Capital Research Group Inc., Weston                   Charles T. Tamburello, 954/217-9555                   Fax: 954/389-5756                   Email: chuck@TheSubway.com URL:              http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.  Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          FLORIDA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: INVESTMENT                   OPINION                   SOURCE:                   Capital                   Research                   Group    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Power Option PLUS Logo    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


People don't seem to want to give us the information needed.  It's like they
are scared to let anyone know anything.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/29/2001 11:08 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Matching gift

This place is more difficult than it needs to be.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 05/29/2001 11:04 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Matching gift

Really!  I hate not having information.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/29/2001 10:57 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: nmann@erac.com
		 Subject: Re: Matching gift

Well, that's something I hadn't heard before.  They should let that be known,
don't you think?  At least now WE know it!

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 05/29/2001 10:56 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Matching gift

I talked to Vanessa Bob at x36781 regarding this matter.  She said she's
forwarded this on to the JK Group which will pay the amount shortly.  The
matching gifts are paid quarterly.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/22/2001 01:55 PM

		 To: community-relations@enron.com
		 cc: (bcc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Matching gift

Hello.

I gave the Matagorda County Fair & Livestock Association $2050, and filled
out the form for the match.  Please advise if this has been paid, as they are
sending me a bill for the $2050, plus a finance charge.

Thank you,

Kay Mann
x57566


Hi, Shelley.  As SPRC chair, I wanted to visit with you sometime over the
next couple of days about this janitorial situation.  Ernie supplied me with
the prototype letter you prepared, as well as your comments about the
independent contractor legalities, responsibilities, etc.  I could use your
advice on this subject to ensure the correct decisions are being made.

My numbers are:
Home  281-589-0800
Cell     713-828-3162

Thanks, Shelley...look forward to visiting with you...wish we had brought
you in on all this from the beginning.  Live and learn!!

Beez Homeyer

Beez Homeyer, Realtor
Keller Williams Realty
281-496-7400 x126
www.BeezBuzz.com

  _____

Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : <http://explorer.msn.com>


Hi Kate,

FYI Carla is backdating deal 506633  from 1/27 to 1/26  for confirmation
purposes per Chris Mallory.

Thanks


In this Violation memo, you are taking out positive P&L associated to a nat
gas posion in the LPG books which is a true hedge versus some long dated
propane positions.  When you add back the hedge P&L I believe there is no
violation.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Abel, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Buy, Rick; Nowlan Jr., John L.; Murphy, Ted; Port, David; Schultz,
Cassandra; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Whalley, Greg
Cc: Apollo, Beth; Wilson, Shona; Thibodeaux, Kenneth; Price, Brent A.; Hall,
D. Todd; Burns, Jennifer; Romero, Araceli; Taylor, Liz; Wallace, Cassi
Subject: Final 6/19/01 Global Products Notification

Attached is the Enron Global Markets Global Products Trading notification
memo for  5 Day Cumulative Loss for June 19, 2001.  The Office of the
Chairman for Enron Global Markets is responsible for printing out a hard copy
of this memo, signing it and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a,
who will forward it to RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You

 << File: 6-19 Global Products 5 Day.doc >>


fine with me


Audrey is doing great.  Dad is doing good. Mom is fair.  She's still struggleing with the new Mom stuff.  Not quite the picture book story she had hoped for.  Can't just hop up and do what she wants anymore.  She's a big advocate for birth control now!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"James S. Homco" <jhomco@minutemaid.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:40 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Interesting !!!

Forget about unimportant work stuff...how are Ingrid and Audrey ???
And is Dad treating them well ??


please print this out so that I can understand it
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 08:04 AM -----

	Vivian Nguyen/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/24/2001 10:12 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: April O&M Report

Richard/Linda,

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Vivian
5-3995


Can there not be an argument made to dive into TXN?  It's trading at 25
forward P/E (2001) with a 5-year consensus growth rate of 24.2.  A PEG of ~1
on a high quality stock with superior technology, good management, great
market position and tremendous long-term growth has got to be an opportunity,
right?  What's your view?

The technicals (MACD) are not great right now but I think fundamentally this
is a tremendous value long-term.  It looks like the economy has really got
the brakes on now (too much) but wouldn't you expect the market to begin
pricing in rate cuts in 2001 pretty soon and an eventual return to high
growth in technology?  I wouldn't touch any peripheral players but some of
the megacap stocks with great market positions, like TXN, are sure tempting.

Nasdaq down 46% from its March high and not looking good at the open.  This
could be a "buy while there is blood in the streets" opportunity.


Hi Van,

Thanks for your message.
Please, stop by and say Hello.

Vince

   Van T Ngo                06/30/2000 04:03 PM

To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Happy holiday!

Vince, I know we've run by each other a couple times but I haven't had a real
chance to talk with you.  I just wanted to let you know how my summer is
progressing, and it's going well.  I'm sitting on 29 now, with CTG in the
Coal Group.  I'm always glad to see some familiar faces from Research and
would love to visit with you.  I'll try to drop by and catch you next week
sometime, if you're here.

I hope you have a great weekend.  I'm getting together with a group of
friends this coming Monday and going to see a baseball game at Enron Field on
the 4th.  It should be fun, even though the Astros will be losing again.

Take care,
Van


FYI.  Attached please find a legal cite that indicates that the federal
government would be the guarantor of the sales under the DOE order.  I have
no idea if this is correct.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 01/24/2001 11:14 AM -----

	Rob Bradley
	01/24/2001 11:05 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Compulsory Sales

FYI--legal cite for the right lawyer.

- Rob

----- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 11:04 AM -----

	Jim DeLong <JDeLong@cei.org>
	Sent by: owner-fme-roundtable@perc.org
	01/24/2001 10:52 AM

		 To: "'Tollroads@aol.com'" <Tollroads@aol.com>, lynns@reason.org,
fme-roundtable@perc.org
		 cc:
		 Subject: Compulsory Sales

PSamuels wrote:  "It seems outrageous that anyone in this country can be
commanded to supply a product against their will, against their better
commercial
judgment, to utilities that have no known way to pay their bills etc. What
is the constitutional basis for such orders, I wonder?"

I do not doubt that the government can order the utilities to keep supplying
electricity, but I think the federal government is now the guarantor of
payment.  See the Supreme Court's 1996 decision in the Winstar case.

James V. DeLong
Senior Fellow -- Project on Technology & Innovation
Competitive Enterprise Institute
1001 Connecticut Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 331-1010 TEL     (202) 331-0640 FAX
jdelong@cei.org        www.cei.org


Linda,
 It is my understanding that all of the existing contracts for business done
in Texas that somehow touches the HPL system will go with HPL or its
marketing entity.  This will mean that ENA will have to negotiate a contract
with each of those parties whose exiasting contracts will go with the HPL
sale to AEP.

	Linda S Bryan
	03/27/2001 02:06 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ENA Contracts

Dan,

Has this all been taken care of through the assignments from HPL to ENA?

Please let me know if there is anything that Global Contracts needs to do.

Thanks,
Linda
---------------------- Forwarded by Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 02:01
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           03/27/2001 12:21 PM

To: Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA Contracts

Linda, Elizabeth Hernandez thought I should contact you about ENA Texas
contracts.  Are the contracts we have in place as ENA sufficient to handle
deals that once was done as HPL but will be done as ENA going forward?  We
are wanting to make sure that we do not have to renegotiate contracts with
our counterparties or be caught off guard by a contract not being in place
once the AEP transaction is complete.  Basically, do we have the contracts in
place to hit the floor running after the HPL sale to AEP goes through?

Dave Baumbach
x35384


Francisco,

I have verified that there are no obstacles for Enron to do a deal with a
Chilean company from Houston.  If you have also made sure that there aren't
any legal problems from your side, all we have to do is agree on a price.
Please e-mail me or call sometime today.  I will be in the office today but
gone on Thursday and Friday.  If you miss me at my desk 713-853-0508, you can
always call my cell phone at 713-806-0612.  I look forward to the opportunity
of doing business with you.

Thanks,

Jay

"Francisco Ruiz-Tagle (CMPC Finanzas)" <FRUIZTAGLE@gerencia.cmpc.cl> on
12/04/2000 01:37:55 PM
To: "'Jay.Epstein@enron.com'" <Jay.Epstein@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: ISDA/Omnibus Template

This company is not government owned. Tks for the forms you sent me.

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Jay.Epstein@enron.com [SMTP:Jay.Epstein@enron.com]
> Enviado el: lunes 4 de diciembre de 2000 14:09
> Para: fruiztagle@gerencia.cmpc.cl
> Asunto: ISDA/Omnibus Template
>
> Francisco,
>
> At your request, I have attached sample short and long form swap
> documents.
> I am still working with our legal department to determine how we can enter
> into a swap with a Chilean company.  Legal wanted me to ak if any part of
> your company government owned.  Please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jay
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Jay Epstein/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000
> 11:06
> AM ---------------------------
>
>
> Tiffany Williams@ENRON
> 12/04/2000 10:54 AM
>
> To:   Jay Epstein/HOU/ECT@ECT
> cc:
> Subject:  ISDA/Omnibus Template
>
> Jay,
>
> Per your request, I've attached an ISDA and Omnibus Template for a swap
>
> (See attached file: ISDA Swap.doc)(See attached file: Omnibus Swap.doc)
>
> Tiffany
>  <<Archivo: ISDA Swap.doc>>  <<Archivo: Omnibus Swap.doc>>


Here are my thoughts

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Paschal, Zelda   On Behalf Of Lokey, Teb
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 2:28 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Coon, Galen; Boatman, Jack; Cady, Rachel; Nacey, Sheila; Studebaker, James ; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	 Web Site Posting for New Cash Out Pricing Provisions

Please review attachment for web posting.  Will posting be critical or non-critical?

	 << File: Cash Out Web Site Notice.doc >>


Attached for your review is a demand letter to Arco for reimbursement to
Houston Pipeline (HPL) for damage to equipment owned by HPL at the Lyondell
Plant.


Please send our response to Euell to her,Vickie, and John Nowlan.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000 03:55 PM -----

	Carol Moffett@EES
	12/11/2000 03:02 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Euell Energy Resources

Hello, Mr. Sanders.  I am Marty Sunde's assistant and I am writing regarding
the 11/22/00 letter from Palmer, Guest & Esses regarding Euell Energy
Resources.  The letter was addressed to Mr. Lay and Marty Sunde in EES
received a copy.  We sent the letter to our General Counsel, Vicki Sharp, who
advises that she passed it on to you for handling.  As the 12/15/00 deadline
(set forth in Mr. Esses' letter) is approaching, I thought I would follow up
to see if a response has been provided to them.  If this has already been
taken care of, would you be so kind as to fax a copy of the letter to us for
our file.  Our fax number is (713) 646-2199.

Please let me know.

Thank you.


This deal is entered as not to be confirmed.  It looks like it should be
confirmed.  Can you check into this and let me know.

Thanks!


Ruth: The press release looks fine.  Mark

	Ruth Ainslie <RAinslie@isda.org>
	02/28/2001 10:57 AM

		 To: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Energy Conference Press Release/Draft Mexico City Agenda

 <<ISDA Energy Conference Release-Revised.doc>>  <<Draft Mexico Agenda
(2-20-01).doc>>

Mark -As we discussed.  I look forward to hearing from you.  Latin American
Committee details to follow soon.  Best, Ruth

 - ISDA Energy Conference Release-Revised.doc
 - Draft Mexico Agenda (2-20-01).doc


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are
rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these
outages.

In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted like the
daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to
load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know.
Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR
COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE
RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - 010801R.xls
 - OUTAGE.dbf


This request has been pending your approval for  3 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081220&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081220
Request Create Date : 1/17/02 3:03:38 PM
Requested For       : winston.jia@enron.com
Resource Name       : Enpower North America West Production Risk_Mgmt - Risk Information Access
Resource Type       : Applications


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000 01:41 PM -----

	Moazzam Khoja@ENRON
	05/24/2000 04:37 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: failure to pay contract

Mark,

Could yu browze thru the attached term sheet and let me know whether it can
be modified in ways that address our issues.

regards
Moazzam


Kate, could you ask Tom if this transaction is suppose to be Firm in Enpower.
Their confirmation says Non-Firm, Transmission Contingent. Could you ask him
which is correct?


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:15:17 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Aryeh Fishman" <afishman@bracepatt.com>, "Andrea Settanni"
<asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com>,
"Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Gene Godley" <ggodley@bracepatt.com>, "Kimberly
Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Michael Pate" <mpate@bracepatt.com>, "Paul
Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: California faces Tuesday blackouts
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline

FYI

California faces Tuesday blackouts
Power shortage continues a day after rolling outages
By Myra P. Saefong, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 10:47 AM ET Mar 20, 2001

FOLSOM, Calif. (CBS.MW) -- California's electricity grid operator said
rolling blackouts could continue Tuesday as idled generating plants and the
lack of payments to small suppliers prompted a drop in operating reserves to
critically low levels.

"We are projecting the possibility of outages sometime between 10 o'clock
(Pacific time) this morning and 8 o'clock this evening," Jim Detmers, vice
president of operations at the California Independent System Operator, said
at a Tuesday morning conference call.

Detmers said that two large generation units that had been expected to be
back online by Tuesday morning, failed to be repaired on time.

The Cal ISO now expects one unit to return by noon Tuesday, with the other
coming back online at midnight.

Additionally, power imports are down by 800 megawatts compared to Monday,
Detmers said, citing exhausted water resources.

The tight power condition "will exist today and may even exist into tomorrow
as well," he said. "A lot depends on what all of California does to conserve
energy."

As of Tuesday morning, the state had more than 12,000 megawatts of planned
and forced generation unit outages.

Power levels from small generators remain "extremely low" with only about
3,000 megawatts of the total 5,000 to 6,000 megawatts of electricity in
operation.

The Cal ISO has said that the small generators are suffering from "financial
concerns and an inability to purchase fuel to run the plants."

California suffered 32-straight days at its highest power alert earlier this
year in part due to the inability of the state's utilities' to purchase
enough power for their customers.

Southern California Edison (EIX: news, msgs, alerts) and another of
California's big utilities, Pacific Gas & Electric (PCG: news, msgs, alerts)
, have combined debts of more than $13 billion from buying wholesale power on
the open market that they must supply to customers at rates capped by state
regulators. See related story.

Blackouts hit electric customers around the state on Monday, from San
Francisco's Fisherman's Wharf to Beverly Hills. Bay Area media reported Cisco
Systems was forced to stop work at one of its Silicon Valley plants.

The blackouts began at noon Monday and continued until about 8 or 9 p.m.
Power for most customers was interrupted for only about 60 to 90 minutes.

The Cal ISO will reassess the power situation and hold a conference call at
10:30 a.m. Pacific time.

Myra P. Saefong is a reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com in San Francisco. The
Associated Press contributed to this report.


Dear Mr. Kaminski:

            I recently sent you a copy of my resume and am just
following up to see if it reached you without any problems? I know you
are a very busy professional and I would like to apologize for any
inconvienence I  have caused. I am just very dedicated in trying to
obtain a career with your very well-respected company. I would really
like to put my expereince and education to work for Enron, as well as
establish my life around the company. I am looking for an entry-level
postion if that's what it takes to bulid my life and family Enron
Corporation. Once again Mr. Kaminski, I am deeply apologetic for taking
up any of your time. Any information you could help me with about my
resume would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your valuable time.

Warmest Regards,
Eric Hilton


I have asked Bob Superty, Kim Theriot and Mechelle Stevens to attend.  I
don't have confirmation yet on whether or not all three will be able to
attend.  I thought that if asked three, that this should work on one of their
schedules.  I will let you know later who will attend.  I will be out of the
office that day.  --sally

From: Greg Piper/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/23/2001 08:06 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Lite Bytz RSVP

Are you or a designate going to this?

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On
Behalf Of Lite Bytz@ENRON
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 8:10 PM
To: ENW-Employees_Houston@ENRON
Subject: Lite Bytz RSVP

This week's Lite Bytz presentation will feature the following APPZ speaker:

Hal Elrod
CommodityLogic
Thursday, April 26, 2001

If you have not already signed up, please RSVP via email to
litebytz@enron.com by the end of the day Tuesday, April 24, 2001.

*Remember: this is now a Brown Bag Event--so bring your lunch and we will
provide

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/revisedhalelrod.ppt


We currently have the following transport contracts on CNG for July.

k#  MDQ  Comment
5A2500  15000  Oak to BG&E

5A2551  4003  Corn to BG&E
5A2551  383  Lebanon to BG&E

5A2526  3947  Corn to Leidy

Total  23,333 dt

Angie and Beavy are working on the fuel waivers for July.  And we can still
take 7950 dth from Cornwell.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/08/2000 08:59 AM -----

	"Tetrault, Charles D." <ctetrault@velaw.com>
	10/07/2000 04:22 PM

		 To: "Tetrault, Charles D." <ctetrault@velaw.com>
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Hunsaker, Barry (EOG Resources)"
<barry_hunsaker@eogresources.com>, "Hoyle, Andy (E-mail)"
<Andrew_Hoyle@eogresources.com>, "'Williams, Steven P.'"
<Steve_Williams@eogresources.com>
		 Subject: DOJ - Memo to File - Range of Market Values

Pearson's June 9, 2000 letter questions why $.10 or $.11 were deducted from
the Transco and Koch indices in connection with the sale of Mobile Bay Block
870 gas.

We responded in detail on October 3.  In addition to those answers, we
should keep in mind that market value cannot necessarily be calculated with
mathematical precision.  Market value is often described in terms of a
range.  Indeed, the Inside FERC's Gas Market Reports publishes not only an
index price, but also a range of prices for each pipeline pricing point.

In looking at the applicable indices for those two pipelines for some of the
sample months, it is clear that, if $.10 or $.11 were deducted from the
index price, then the resulting price would still be in the range as
published by Inside FERC.

For example, in December 1996, the Transco Zone 3 index price was $3.82.
The published range was $3.38 to $3.95.  So adjusting the index by 10 cents
still keeps you well within the range.

Similarly, for the 1996 Koch So. La. index.  The index price was $3.82.  The
range was $3.55 to $3.94.  Again, an 11 cent adjustment is still well within
the range.

A quick review of other months shows that sometimes the range was narrower,
and the adjustments would take you outside the range.  Nonetheless, we
should keep this background information in mind in case Justice continues to
pursue this point.

Charles D. Tetrault
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1455 Pennsylvania Ave. N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
ctetrault@velaw.com
202.639.6551 [voice]
202.639.6604 [fax]

 - att1.unk


Sharon,

How does Thursday at 1pm sound?

Thanks,

Errol


I don't think this is very usefull but you guys will know best.

MARQ CAPACITY AVAILABLE                               Received 2/29/00 9:20 am
                                                      Posted 2/29/00 9:30 am

 CNG Transmission will accept bids for the following MARQ capacity,
which is available for service commencing March 2,2000.

 Receipt Point:  1,779 Dths/day at Meter #60004
     Name - Aggregation Point #1

     721 Dth/day at Meter #50004
     Name - Finnefrock Aggregation Point

Rate:  Maximum Demand   Effective Tariff Max (Currently $6.2500)

Primary Term: Commencing March 2, 2000 through March 31, 2000

MARQ:  2,500 DT/Day

Bids will be evaluated using the Net Revenue criteria of Section 23.3.B.2
of CNG's FERC Gas Tariff. Subject to the open-access requirements of Parts
161 and 284 of the Commission's regulations, unless mutually agreed otherwise
in consideration of relevant operational and market factors, CNG reserves the
right to reject any bids at less than its maximum applicable rates.

CNG also reserves the right to reject contingent bids and bids from any party
that does not qualify for service in accordance with all applicable
provisions
of CNG's FERC Gas Tariff.

Bids for this capacity must be submitted to CNG by fax at (304) 623-8530,
during the period from 10:00 AM (EST) February 29, 2000, through 10:00 AM
(EST)
on March 1, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding this capacity, please contact Iris King
at (304) 623-8213.


Hi folks.  I'm not as witty as Clay, and I know even less French, so I'll
get straight to the point.  Bachelor party plans are well underway, but a)
we need an idea of how many people we're working with, and b) we need your
suggestions on the best way to celebrate Eric's last few days of being his
own man.  (Okay, those were back in 1996 or so, but it's a symbolism thing.)

To facilitate this, Kiernan has erected (hee hee) a website dedicated to the
May 12 party.  Go to www.burrosale.com, and click on the picture most
representative of the dates Eric went on before Tara.  If you choose
correctly, you will be able to read updates and post on a message board.
The message board is to be used to discuss the party and embarrass Eric in
any way you find appropriate.

If you haven't already please RSVP by e-mail to me, or call at 512.297.8085
or for a local call, Clay at 713.662.3789.  In order to defray costs, there
will be a "suggested donation" of $25.  Spots in the limo will be assigned
on a first-come first-serve basis to those that pay.  I hate to do that, but
the poor starving law student best man isn't eating only Wolf Chili and
Ramen noodles because he likes that pork flavor.

Anyhow, check the site frequently for updates, enjoy the board, and spread
the word to those I don't know that would be interested.

adam f.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


We have no way to input a storage deal for Cilco.  The way that the contract
is set up, does not fit into the systems as they are.

D

   Aimee Lannou                02/04/2000 09:31 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Grant, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cilco Storage Withdrawal

Daren - Can you set up a deal for the Cilco withdrawal for Dec. 99 going
forward?  I know a deal has never been set up for this but volume management
wants a deal set up so they won't have to set up an accounting arrangement
evey month.  Please let me know, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks.

Aimee


---------------------- Forwarded by John Suttle/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 01:44
PM ---------------------------

"Diggins, Timothy W." <TDiggins@ropesgray.com> on 08/10/2000 06:22:57 PM
To: "'jsuttle@enron.com'" <jsuttle@enron.com>, "'jpeters@enron.com'"
<jpeters@enron.com>
cc: "Kimberly J. Noble (E-mail)" <noblek@hmc.harvard.edu>
Subject: Harvard/Enron ISDA

Attached are revised drafts of the proposed Schedule and Addendum, marked to
show changes from the most recent draft you reviewed.  I believe that we
have implemented most of the changes you suggested.

Although I have discussed most of the changes with Kim Noble, she may have
additional or different thoughts.

We are still in the process of reviewing the form of Enron guaranty, and
will come back to you with comments shortly.

We look forward to hearing from you at your early convenience.

Best regards.

 <<81004.DOC>>  <<81005.DOC>>

 - 81004.DOC
 - 81005.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 09:04
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/28/99 07:52:30 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2000 NUMBERS

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/28/99
07:57 AM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 04:30 PM

To: Joann Collins/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joni
Veselack/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: 2000 NUMBERS

Hi Everybody,

I haven't input my CPA 8 numbers yet, I am still sorting them into market
areas.  I am not sure that my numbers are correct due to production and
wholesale issues.  I am hoping to have a couple of people look over my work,
but so far they have been unavailable when I finally got my numbers together.

I appreciate your patience and apologize for the inconvenience.

Thanks.


how do you like that ene now?  it is very strong.  i will be in tomorrow
around 2pm.  you can reach me on my cell phone at (713)825-8410.  maybe we
can get together tomorrow or wednes.


Opps, can I scoot you to Thursday?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Stephanie
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 4:01 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Lunch today?

You're on for WEdnesday!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 11:04 AM
To:	Miller, Stephanie
Subject:	RE: Lunch today?

How about Wednesday?  Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Stephanie
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Lunch today?

Can't today - next week?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Miller, Stephanie
Subject:	Lunch today?

Hi Stephanie,

By chance are you available for lunch today?  Kim.


Attached is the Junel 2001 Assignment, Termination & Expiration Report for Houston Pipe Line's contracts.  (FYI - It contains all of the entries made by our group since the report was last done on 3/23/01, regardless of the effective date.)  If you do not need to receive this report or if you know of someone else that should receive it, please let me know by e-mail or phone (713-571-3187) so that I can either remove your name from or add their name to the distribution list.


Howard --

I received a call from Jeff Brown who said that he had visited the NYPSC and NYISO to discuss load curtailment.  He had placed a few calls into you and hadn't heard back.

When you get back, please let me know where this stands.  No big deal, but I want to understand what is going on with the load curtailment efforts.

Jim


I know we've made good progress with respect to morning reports for EGM.
However, I continue to receive most reports after 9:00 a.m., which is too
late into the trading day.  Please let me know if there are resources you
need, so this aspect of EGM can run as smoothly as ENA gas.

Thanks.

Jeff


Everyone,

Enron has just launched an effort to educate California businesses on the
California energy crisis, engage them in the debate, and coordinate our
efforts in working toward "real solutions".  A direct mail piece was sent out
on Monday from Ken Lay.  The materials that were sent are attached below.

There will be follow up with the businesses that we have targeted.  We also
intend to make contact with non-business organizations in the coming weeks.

PLEASE NOTE:  The letters reference a California website that we have set up
for businesses to receive additional information.  DO NOT GO TO THIS SITE AS
WE ARE TRACKING THE NUMBER OF HITS WE RECEIVE AND WE DON'T WANT A SKEWED
NUMBER DUE TO ENRON EMPLOYEE HITS.

If you have questions, please feel free to call me at 3-9104.
Thanks!

We also enclosed Ken Lay's San Francisco Chronicle op-ed (March 1st), and the
Wall Street Journal article on the economic impact of the energy crisis
(March 8th).


This is the first of two emails I'm sending you.  Lee revised the Salmon
contract you did, and now it needs to be "unrevised" in these ways.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001 03:06
PM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/11/2001 03:05:50 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE
AEP)" <lee.johnson@ps.ge.com>
cc: "Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>

Subject: RE: Revised Salmon Agreement

Kay:

I'm on the phone with Lee and he agrees that we need to put the stabilizer
back in.

This will change the various amounts, I think, as follows:

Unit Liability Amount:  14,103,675
Maximum Liability Amount:  56,414,700
Purchase Amount:  50,785,900

The rest of the document is okay.  We are still waiting for the lender docs
back but don't expect any show stoppers.  Lee will be back in the office
tomorrow and can sign documents (if the agreements are okay), and date
effective today if that is a requirement for Enron.

Otherwise, we'll wait for your instructions.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:57 PM
To: lee.johnson@ps.ge.com
Cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Subject: Re: Revised Salmon Agreement

Me again.

Here's the version I referenced in my earlier email.  I believe we need to
restore the stabilizer stuff, but I wanted to get agreement.

Thanks,

Kay

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/09/2001 05:55:57 PM

To:   kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc:   kay.mann@enron.com

Subject:  Revised Salmon Agreement

Kent/Kay-

I've redline the Salmon contract for Exhibits A and B, Purchase Amount,
Maximum Liability Amount, and Unit Liability Amount.  The Power System
Stabilizer has been struck from scope, because I can recall Bill Williams
advising that LV would need them, Delta/Salmon would not.  That's consitent
with the other units going to CA (w/ Intergen).

Regards,

Lee <<Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC>>

(See attached file: Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC)


The report named: East Power Position <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=16&report_name=East+Power+Position&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/24/2001>, published as of 10/24/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000 03:52 PM -----

	Melissa Ann Murphy
	11/22/2000 05:42 PM

		 To: Bert.dunn@eweb.eugene.or.us, jdeason@chbh.com
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Financial Confirmation Letter-EWEB

Please see the attached confirmation letters:

Thank you,
Melissa Murphy
(713) 853-1886


As a follow-up to the Enron Net Works All Employee meeting on October 5, we are pleased to announce a number of organizational changes.

Beth Perlman, currently CIO for EA Systems, will work closely with Mark Pickering on a number of key projects for Enron Net Works.  Additionally, Beth plans to explore various commercial opportunities within Enron.  Replacing Beth in her current role will be Steve Hotte, currently CIO for EGS.

Anthony Dayao will continue as CIO for EES Systems.  In addition to his current responsibilities, Anthony will assume responsibility for creating a combined Wholesale/Retail Power Trading and Risk Management system.

Jeff Johnson will move into the new role of CIO for EGM/EIM Systems.

John Paskin will transfer to the Houston office from London to take up the new role of CIO for Corporate Systems. His group will include the ISC, Enterprise Portal, Intranet Solutions, CRM strategy, Treasury Systems, Development Support and will matrix into HR IT Systems.

Continuing in their current positions are Inja Chun, CIO for EBS Systems; Paul Freeman, CIO for Enron Europe; Jay Webb, CIO for eCommerce, which now includes Commodity Logic Systems; and Jenny Rub, CIO for Infrastructure.

All of the above positions report into to Mark Pickering in the Office of the Chairman for Enron Net Works.  Transitions into their new positions will begin within the next two weeks and should be complete by the end of the year.

We are currently interviewing individuals to serve as CIO for EGS, as well as an individual to serve as head of our Enterprise Framework group.  We will keep you posted on the progress of these searches.

Please join us in congratulating all of these individuals on their new responsibilities.


https://gcs.enron.com/expertfinder/tcid.asp

Steve,
Please take a look and I will be available to walk you through the
application at your convenience.   I've attached a power point presentation
to help describe.
ay


are there any hotties coming?


Dear Ken:

I hear the company may be recieving bids for the trading arm of Enron.  I have heard that is the strongest part of the company.  I guess you know which is best to raise capital for the company, selling the trading business or holding on to it (a money making arm) to gain a stronger future position.  Good luck and may god be with your choices.

Dear Ken:

I am very sad to see what has happened to such a big icon in Houston.  I am very sorry to see you struggle through this and try to remain at a high level.  I am very pleased to see you chose to stay with the company and work at what I hope is its new birth and positive rise in society and business community.

I had a chance to meet with you a little over a year ago at a charity function.  While I am no expert in the energy business and I'm but a college student at the present time, I would like to share a view from the other side of the inner loop you???re used to.   Before I met you everyone I spoke with had nothing but wonderful things to say about you and what a genius you are.  After the news came out about the misfortune of Enron, some of those same people started bad mouthing some of the same people they praised.   It made me sick and made me think very little of those individuals.  I was concerned because I could not believe that you would intentionally and knowingly do something that would jeopardize the very company you helped build.  The day I saw you make the decision to not leave or step down as CEO I knew then that you must not have been directly involved in the cover-up done by your previous COO and a couple of other top executives you had entrusted.   Those few peo!
ple, one of which you had recently hired, all quit just before the news came out about Enron bookkeeping.

I feel safe in saying you must have been misadvised by those few people or you did not know what they were doing behind your back.  It is obvious they were not working for Enron like you, but rather "at" Enron to try to steal as much money and benefits they could and then head for the hills, which is what they did.   The mere act of having several top executives quit working at Enron after a short stay at the company and then cashing out on their holdings tells me it was intentional and I consider them thieves.  It would be a different story had they stayed like you and really cared about the company and what it represents and does for society as a whole.

I feel very sorry for those investors and employees who have been devastated by what has happened. BUT, it makes me very angry to hear people and writers casting stones on you and a company that has done so much over the past several years for so many.   Enron has funded more charity events and backed more functions and elections than most.  Now when the tide has turned and (due to a few greedy top executive decisions) Enron is in the position of needing help, everyone is out for blood and looking to end a company that still represent the same work it did before, but whose value has decreased because of word of mouth and the stupid greed of your previous employees.

Some people I have talked with say Enron is finished and is only a matter of time before it is gone.  That makes me angry too.  From what I see you have not given up on the company nor have you abandoned ship.  That tells me you may be trying to rebuild the company and its reputation.   That would be the greatest thing to do and show those who are out for Enron???s demise (and who can do nothing but bad mouth) just what you???re really made of and put them in their place.  I have been reading nothing but negative articles about the company.   I feel like it is not the company, because that would mean every single employee would be to blame.  Rather the writers should focus on the few individuals who cashed out and split.

I would hope you could remember back 4 or 5 years ago when the company was really thriving and doing well.  I hope you can remember the good things about the company and the fact that it can still (and does) make money from its businesses.  It can turn around if you want it to.   I would hope you can make the trading business and other companies held by Enron what it once was without having to sell off too many of the future profitable ones and make use of the two beautiful buildings now towering over Houston's skyline.  I call those Houston's twin towers.

Other large companies in the past have turned around after similar set backs as horrible as this with Enron.  Your turn around would be record setting.  I heard about others (like the teachers retirement fund) making noise about wanting to take Enron to court because they invested millions.   That is stupid because it is their choice to invest and their risk to take, especially making it after the news broke about the company.  Sure they trusted that Dynegy would merge, so perhaps their frustration should be aimed at Dynegy or perhaps use their collective educated minds together to help find a way to turn Enron around and make their investment purposeful rather than throwing stones.

I think Dynegy is a wonderful company as well, but it "was mean" for them to come out and say, "yes they would merge" and then not.  I realize it's all business and people like to make money, but it's another thing to flat steal and lie (like your executives you trusted did) rather than profit from hard work and honesty.

I personally know of many large corporations and politicians who have things to hide that would cause problems like yours.  Your company is not alone, which is why I am so angry with others throwing stones at you and Enron.  This would not happen if there weren???t executives in corporate industries like the ones you entrusted your company to who try to take rather than give and earn from it.   Perhaps many should learn from Colleen Barrett, COO of Southwest Airlines.  Do you know that they are the only airlines to refuse federal aid recently and they are doing better then most airlines.

Good luck and thank you for hanging in there and making me believe there are still some good top CEO's out there.

--

--

__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/


The party at AA is Roger Willard 713 646 6360 if you feel up to trying to convince him.

Rod
Cell 713 201 6135

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>
To: Bowen Jr., Raymond <Raymond.Bowen@ENRON.com>
Sent: Sun Nov 11 15:38:43 2001
Subject: AA Concerns

Yes.  They want us to record the amounts loaned, normal loans, as a reduction of equity, if ENE does not currently have the ability to repay from either cash or other assets or credit capability.  They do not want to count the 1.5B or the bank loans since they will simply increase the size of the notes.  They are specifically concerned about the current intercompany notes.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Just little things like I should be resolving my job situation by the end of
next week and some other little stuff that has made me happy and a little
more confident about stuff.  Nothing too major. After how things went the
last few months it doesn't take much!


Mike - Here is the situation.  Between ENA and EES, we sell gas to core and
non-core customers, and also have gas in storage as well as in the park and
lend service.  I think we can be sympathetic to the ORA argument that the
diversion tariff penalties did not anticipate OFOs and EFOs in situations
such as we face here (shortages due to credit problems rather than lack of
supply).  Assessing extreme penalties, as the OFO/EFOs would do, on users who
are not perfectly imbalance under this situation certainly seems unfair.
However, I think we should argue that limiting the payments to
shippers/customers whose gas is diverted to serve core customers to a market
index may not fully compensate for the diversion.  The pay back specifically
does not include interstate pipeline charges, and there may be other costs as
well to the marketer/customer who had supplies taken away.

I need an estimate of the cost to make this filing and follow it up for the
RCR process, and I would also like any feedback anyone has on what our
position should be in this matter.  The response is due Friday.


This is to confirm Mr. Kean's attendance at the HR/ PR/ Comm.  Affairs VP Pre
ranking scheduled for 14 December at 2:00 in EB 30C2.  Also in attendance at
this meeting will be Cindy Olson, Rick Shaprio, Beth Tilney,  and Dan
Leff.    Please don't hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or
concerns.  Many thanks,

 Gina Corteselli


We have all been to those meetings where someone wants "more than 100%."
>Well here's how you do that. Here's how you can achieve 103%. First of
>all, here's a little math that might prove helpful in the future. How
>does one achieve 100% in LIFE? Begin by noting the following.
>
>IF :
>
>A = 1
>B = 2
>C = 3
>D = 4
>E = 5
>F = 6
>G = 7
>H = 8
>I = 9
>J = 10
>K = 11
>L = 12
>M = 13
>N = 14
>O = 15
>P = 16
>Q = 17
>R = 18
>S = 19
>T = 20
>U = 21
>V = 22
>W = 23
>X = 24
>Y = 25
>Z = 26
>
>
>Then:
>
>H A R D W O R K =
>8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = Only 98%
>
>Similarly,
>
>K N O W L E D G E =
>11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = Only 96%
>
>But interesting (and as you'd expect),
>
>A T T I T U D E =
>1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%..... This is how you achieve 100% in LIFE.
>
>But EVEN MORE IMPORTANT TO NOTE (or REALIZE), is
>
>B U L L S H I T =
>2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%
>
>So now you know what all those high-priced consultants, upper
>management, and motivational speakers really mean when they want to
>exceed 100%!


Why did you send this credit worksheet to me for a physical deal?


Approved on behalf of Dari.  The attached document has the dates right--its
Nov. 29, 2000 through Dec. 31, 2000.  DF

	From:  Mike Barry                           11/28/2000 09:45 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Doug
Aschwege/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ranelle Paladino/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Posting Revision

Rather than stating that capacity may be available from November 29, 2000
through March 31, 2001, the posting will now state that capacity may be
available from November 29, 2000 through March 31, 2001.

For those of you have already sent your approval, please notice this change.
For those of you who have not, please forward your approval to me immediately
to insure an immediate posting.

As discussed, the posting will remain up today until 6:00 p.m.  Please let me
know if there are any further questions.

Thanks

Mike


Forwarded at the request of Joe Hillings:

Joe Hillings: -- The notes look great.  I have made a couple of technical
corrections to the document, which I am attaching as a separate file.

To all -- everyone here at Hills & company hopes you have a wonderful
holiday!

Bob Fisher (Hills & Company)

___________________________________________________________________________
Dear Friends: Please review, correct, make additions and return. Joe

The Energy Services Coalition (please note that we are no longer using
US
WTO ESC) met at the request of Carol Balassa of USTR to get her
perspective
on energy services negotiations of the WTO and what our coalition needs
to
accomplish as well as a time perspective.

Present from the USG were Carol Balassa (USTR), Josephine Ludolph and
Richard Boll (DOC), Russ Profozich (DOE), Patricia Norman (DOS) and a
regular from the ITC.

Joe Hillings, Christina Bolton, Bob Fisher, Steve Burns, Brian Petty and
Chris Long represented the ESC.

Carol conducted an extensive and excellent briefing listing several
phases
of activity. She started the session by telling those present that the
lack
of action at Seattle was not a negative on what we need to accomplish
this
coming year. We are on track and need to produce various position papers
as
early as the end of January.

Articles 19 of the GATT requires that the WTO make progress on
agriculture
and services issues although it does not identify a date certain to
achieve
agreement..

Ambassador Barshefsky is committed to beginning services negotiations
beginning in January.

A Committee on Specific Committments is charged with the responsibility
to
draft issues. The USTR wants to have a definition of issues from the ESC
by
the end of January to be submitted to the USG representatives on the
Committee.

A second significant group in the process is the Working Group On
Domestic
Rights.This group is chaired by Peter Collins. Peter needs to know what
are
the domestic regulatory issues that could be raised by other WTO members
as
reasons not to liberalize various sectors. This information is to be
supplied in the first half of 2000.

In late spring after group one and two have done a significant part of
their work the USTR will be deciding what additional principles are
needed
to be tabled in the negotiation. They expect these working groups will
begin to meet at the WTO by the end of next summer.

Three basic columns headed by (1) Market Access, (2) National Treatment,
(3) Additional Committments (Could be proposed annex such as the process
Tim Richards has proposed in our Electricity Working Group listing
examples) is the format to be developed for the two groups.

Carol advised us that whatever we develop should be with the intention
of
getting Less Developed Countries (LDCs) supporting our basic principles
in
case a multilateral negotiation is not launched. We should work the
current
liberalization process being prosecuted in the APEC and FTAA
negotiations..

The next phase of Carol's presentation addressed the recent response
USTR
received to the questions they submitted to DG 17 (it no longer exisits
under the new commission) asking the EU to address their feelings about
the
liberalization of energy services.

We have not been given a copy of the EU response and Carol has asked Ms.
Klinkers of the EU if the response can be shared with the ESC to secure
industry responce. Carol and others from the USG attending the meeting
are
trying to ascertain just who drafted the responses which they
characterized
as "confusing and not indicating a real understanding of the current
practices and developments in the energy services sector."  We do know
that
the USG has called this office to ask how they need to respond to the EU
response that electricity is a good and not a service. Our immediate
response is that this is a matter of some disagreement among EU members
and
the EU staff. The movement of electricity across national boundries may
be
a good but the sale and trading of electricity is definately a service.

The EU response we were told makes the agrument that in their view that
many of the items raised in the October paper of the USTR were GAT
covered
such as construction, engineering, etc and therefore, may not need to be
raised in the services negotiations although these items will at least
need
some sort of annex to make sure they are included.. The EU believes that
if
you own or operate electricity producting  then its a good but if you
operate an IPP to sell electricity to various parties, its a service.

We were told that the EU response does not seem to understand or cover
renewables such as wind and solar both of which are important in
Europe's
plan to diversify and develop green energy.  They also believe that
price/risk management should be considered under finance services not
energy services.

The session was then open to general discussion. Bob Fisher commented
that
the EU does not seem to understand the scope of today's energy services
industry. That we now have a seemless web of energy services that has
been
developed. What about environmental services? Again, the EU response is
confusted and incomplete. Apparently they feel that environmental
services
can be considered elsewhere in the negotiation.

Who from the EU drafted this paper? The staff has changed and we don't
know
how "high" in their heirarchy this was considered. Carol Balassa
responded
that she is trying to determine who drafted the response..  Brian Petty
advised that his intelligence is that energy services is being discussed
and considered at the highest levels of the Commission.

Carol told us that she is trying to get everything together before
"talking" to the EU in January when she hopes to specifically respond
and
discuss their current returned response. Therefore, she is asking the
Energy Services Coalition to complete the work of our four Working
Groups
which will allow the Hills people to develop the definition and basic
negotiating position papers.

The DOS representative then suggested that we engage in some"capacity
building." This was defined as an outreach program to brief WTO member
delegations on the meaning of energy services. Carol suggested that
after
her January meeting the EU could be agreeable to having our industry
group
meet with their representatives to explain how energy services has
evolved
and what is included in energy services.

We moved to a discussion of the definitions paper itself. Bob Fisher
reminded those present that the current matrix developed for the APEC
process was still an excellent guide to definitions although items such
as
renewables, heating and certain trading and financial services would
need
to be added. To meet some EU concerns that they are not a party to APEC
and
therefore suspicious of any such document, we should remove the
reference
to APEC.

Our group pointed to the Tim Richards paper developed for our
Electricity
Working Group which gives a broad definition but then contains a
footnote
known as the illustrative list which lists the various items that we
believe constitute energy services under that heading. Bob Fisher said
that
this was the likely format we would ultimately adopt in the material
prepared for USTR and others in the WTO process.  Bob said that once
negotiators agree on the need for liberalized energy services they can
"fit" whatever they want under the broad definition.

The last question raised was what happens to the ATL (accelerated tariff
liberalization) which also covers some energy matters which WTO
countries
had contemplated being approved in Seattle. Carol said that she did not
know.

The meeting then adjourned.

The ESC needs to complete the Working Group process and complete the
questionaire at the earliest possible time to allow the Hills people to
prepare the basic document. Working Group chairs are to be asked to
complete this process by mid January.

Dear Reviewers: Please review at your earliest opportunity, make
corrections, additions and whatever and return to me for distribution.
Distribution will be to our ESC Executive Committee first and then to
our
entire membership of 45 (not to those who have not signed on as members)
and to USG participants.

 - ESC~Balassa~briefing~memcon~12-99.doc


FYI.  New gas complaint filed by Lief Cabraser.

>  <<3-22 Sweetie's Complaint.pdf>>
>
> **************
>
> CONFIDENTIAL
>
> Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP
> 600 West Broadway
> Suite 2600
> San Diego, CA 92101-3391
> (619) 236-1414
>
> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
> confidential and intended to be sent only to the stated recipient of the
> transmission.  It may therefore be protected from unauthorized use or
> dissemination by the attorney-client and/or attorney work-product
> privileges.  If you are not the intended recipient or the intended
> recipient's agent, you are hereby notified that any review, use,
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited.  You are also asked to notify us immediately by telephone and
> to delete this transmission with any attachments and destroy all copies in
> any form.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
>

 - 3-22 Sweetie's Complaint.pdf


I've reviewed the IGS market development agreement pursuant to your request.
It expires 2/29/00.  The agreement requires the parties to meet 90 days prior
to that date for the purpose of discussing an extension but does not obligate
us to agree to any such extension.

As you know, I have a conflict tomorrow at 10, but would be happy to provide
any other information you need for the meeting.


Start Date: 4/12/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041213.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  19.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/12/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 04:31 PM
---------------------------

<butch@watsonmoving.com> on 11/13/2000 08:29:17 PM
To: <DBennyDad@aol.com>, <DBennyDad@aol.com>, <BBURGE@FLASH.NET>,
<KbutchW@aol.com>, <jdaghorn@aol.com>, <Catho928@aol.com>,
<Mrreemus@aol.com>, <murphyg@mercersales.com>, <EGwydir@aol.com>,
<robin99tim@yahoo.com>, <kingb@nuevoenergy.com>, <peggy01@ev1.net>,
<kay_mitchell@hotmail.com>, <sneal@enron.com>, <tdpatton00@yahoo.com>
cc:
Subject: Banner Painting

Dear Wildcat Moms:

We will be painting banners for each of the boys at my house
beginning at 9:00am Wednesday, Nov. 15 - come if you can....

Karen Butcher


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude93.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas93.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil93.pdf

Jan WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clf-qof.pdf
Jan Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Jan Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
Dec/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG93.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG93.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL93.pdf

Scott Mollner Recomendation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/recom11-19-01.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000
10:37 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
04/12/2000 10:11 AM
To: Chris Holmes/HOU/ECT@EES
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Chase

Chris,

We don't have yet any report on Broadband that might help you, developed
internally
by my group. We are working on a tutorial and we shall send you a copy when
it's ready.

The person who can give you an introduction  to this market is Ravi
Thuraisingham.

Vince

Chris Holmes@EES
04/05/2000 09:55 PM
Sent by: Chris Holmes@EES
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Chase

Vince:

 I am working now in EES as the Chase National Account manager and  am
developing new products to sell Chase. One of the products  I am working on
integrates the provision of broad band with  a  package of   computer
hardware and software for a company's employees.
I can explain more if you are interested.

I understand you put together a  report on Broadband which has helped educate
people as to the technology and economics. Can I get a copy?.

Also do you have any analyses on Chase that might help me  detect other
opportunities?

Is there anyone on your staff with whom I should talk?

Thanks

Chris


Heres the latest with the PGE changes.   I will send the latest when Robert
reviews the SDGE and SCE portions

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Soo, Jeffrey A.; Tribolet, Michael; Neustaedter, Robert
Subject: DRW credit accumulation

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 10:58 AM -----

	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate 05/09/2001 03:58 PM 	   To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: DRW credit accumulation

 << File: m010508.xls >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 02:15 PM
---------------------------

Warren Schick@ENRON
10/30/2000 10:25 AM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jim Curry/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Tilotta/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew F
Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Duke Tax Questions

Don:

The property tax quesitons with responses are attached.  Please pay
particular attention to:

Linconln Center - 1st question

Wheatland - Romnan Number vii

If you have any questions please let me know.

Warren


well, i'm sorry it's been cancelled.  would have been fun.  i'm going to go
anyway---get my review from paul and talk to the folks up there.  can we do
the call at 10 am PDT?

best,
jeff

	Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/30/2001 03:15 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE:

I sort of invited myself along (at Sue's invitation).  Still haven't seen the
Western trading floor, haven't met Tim Belden, etc.  Besides, it made sense
to be up to speed on the issues.  I should have figured you should have been
on the list.  are we having fun yet??

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Denne, Karen
Subject: RE:

were you going, too?  i hadn't heard a damned thing.  steffes just informed
me.


I can't believe it is already time for our trip up to Kansas.  We are
arriving on Thursday morning and returning on Sunday morning.  Other than the
game on Saturday, we don't have any plans.  See you soon.

DG


Start Date: 4/1/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040105.txt


Here it is.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 08/24/99 10:14 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Melissa Hughes <MHUGHES@HOLLANDHART.COM>
08/24/99 11:11 AM

To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Lease Agreement Attached

 - 0096238.DOC


This is the latest draft.  EES is also making some further changes (discussed
yesterday) which aren't reflected in this version.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 09:40 AM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	11/30/2000 06:17 PM

		 To: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Bo Barnwell/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Master Service Agreement

The attached redline document includes the various language changes we
discussed today and some other small changes.  These are in addition to the
action items that EES was going to pursue.


The deals should have been corrected in Sitara by now - if not please check
with Beverly.

                                                                     Thank
You!


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001
03:38 PM ---------------------------

"Carlos Giron" <Carlos.Giron@psiusa.com> on 04/23/2001 01:48:45 PM
To: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com, Angela.teerwilliams@gte.net, Glenn@home.com,
Ralphmayers@hotmail.com, Yhaynes@mindspring.com, Mike.Kotar@psiusa.com,
ronniegiron@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: snake

Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:45:14 -0500
From: "Bishop Keller" <BKeller@psiusa.com>
To: Carlos.Giron@psiusa.com
Subject:  snake
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="SNAKE.doc"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="SNAKE.doc"

 - SNAKE.doc


OUTLOOK EMAIL NOTIFICATION

                    Your Date of Migration is: May 23rd

  YOU WILL BE UNABLE TO SEND E-MAIL unless you take the following action:

Please go through your Notes email and clean out as many old/un-needed
email items as possible BEFORE your date of migration.? After you are
migrated to Outlook you will only be allocated 100MB of total Mailbox
space.?? If more than this amount of data is migrated to Outlook YOU WILL
NOT BE ABLE TO SEND E-MAIL until it is below the 100MB limit.? Cleaning up
your Notes email now will prevent this from happening to YOU.

Enron's messaging platform is migrating from Lotus Notes to Microsoft
Outlook 2000 worldwide.  You will be accessing Outlook for all of your
email functions.

WHY IS ENRON MIGRATING TO OUTLOOK 2000?

Many factors contributed to the decision to migrate from Lotus Notes to
Microsoft Exchange/Outlook.  The most prominent factors were:

?    Significant advantages to moving to a product that is more integrated
with current Enron apps (Windows 2000, Office and Internet Explorer)
?    More efficient Shared PC and Roaming User features
?    Improved support and integration for Palm/CE devices
?    Instant Messaging capabilities

WHAT IS BEING MIGRATED TO OUTLOOK 2000?

?    Email Messages.  From the date of your scheduled migration, the last
(30) thirty days of your Email will be converted for use in Outlook.
?    All your folders in Notes you use to store email messages in.
?    To Do Items
?    Journal Items
?    Calendar Entries dating from (1) one year in the past to (10) ten
years in the future will be converted.
?    Address Books, but NOT your Distribution Lists that you created.  You
will need to re-create these in Outlook.

Thank you,

Outlook 2000 Migration Team


I would let her know that there is no definite timeline but we are closing a transaction next week.

-----Original Message-----
From: Fuller, Dave
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Whitt, Mark; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: FW: EPNG Space

Any suggestions before I respond to this?

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry, Penny [mailto:barryp@bp.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Fuller, Dave
Subject: RE: EPNG Space

Dave,

Just wanted to clarify what kind of deadline your aiming for with this
transport proposal.  The reason I am asking is I have taken this to the next
level and we will probably need several days to run through our internal
processes.  I know you are working with multiple parties so if you let me
know how you would like to proceed then we can be working on a similar
timeline.

Thanks,  Penny

-----Original Message-----
From: Fuller, Dave [mailto:Dave.Fuller@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:59 PM
To: Barry, Penny
Subject: RE: EPNG Space

Sorry its taking me so long the guy I need to tlk to is out.  I'll get
you the particulars tomorrow.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry, Penny [mailto:barryp@bp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:25 AM
To: Fuller, Dave
Subject: RE: EPNG Space

Dave, you also mentioned space on TW - do you have any more information
on
this?

Thanks, Penny

-----Original Message-----
From: Fuller, Dave [mailto:Dave.Fuller@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:49 AM
To: barryp@bp.com
Subject: EPNG Space

Hey Penny,

One more thought on the EPNG capacity valuation we've been discussing...
physical gas in the San Juan is selling at a discount to index,
therefore we are incorporating that into our valuation.  I thought you
might want to consider that as well.

Thanks,

Dave Fuller
Enron North America
503-464-3732

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Gerald,

Here is the first credit worksheet for terms to the draft Reliant contract.
Once you prepare the draft, e-mail it to me, and I will forward it to BGML.
After that, we can get the contact and address information to formally pursue
a negotiation.

thanks
brant


Jay Aldis                   Billy Dyer
Hon. Michael Fleming            Hon. Dwight Jefferson
William King              Mark Lanier
Hon. David Medina                 Dixon Montague
Joseph O. Slovacek
cordially invite you to attend a fundraising reception honoring
Judge Richard Hill
Former Judge, County Civil Court No. 1 and
Candidate for Judge, 190th Civil District Court
Tuesday, February 5, 2002  from  5:30 to 7:30 p.m.
The Home of Brenda Arnett
4411 Mandell (near Richmond)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I want to attend the reception for Judge Richard Hill.
___ $5,000 Underwriter          ___ $2,500 Patron
___ $1,000 Sponsor              ___ $500 Host
___ $250  Contributor           ___ $100 Friend
___ Unable to attend $_____
Name: _______________________________________________________
Address: _____________________________________________________
  ___________________________________________________________
Phone: __________________________ Fax: _______________________
E-mail: _______________________________________________________
Occupation/Title:_____________________   Employer: ________________________
Please make checks payable to:
Richard Hill Campaign
710 N. Post Oak Rd., Suite 107
Houston, TX  77024
If you have any questions or wish to make a reservation, please call
Heidi M. Lange at 713-681-1996 or fax 713-681-8402
Pol. adv. pd. for by the Richard Hill Campaign, Sabrina Hill, Treas., PO BOX 411, Hou, Texas 77001


sorry.  yes, i can.

	Lysa Akin@ECT
	10/25/2000 03:59 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron
		 cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Message Points

I have nto heard from you yet on whether you can attend.  Please advise ASAP.

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 10/25/2000 02:04 PM
---------------------------

Paul Kaufman
10/24/2000 04:39 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona Petrochko, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, lysa.akin@enron.com@ECT
Subject: Message Points

Jim Steffes suggested that we develop message points in anticipation of
FERC's ruling on November 1.

In this regard, we could:  (1) use the Seabron Adamson paper as our central
message; and (2)develop separate messages for a variety of FERC
outcomes--e.g., cost-based rates or additional rate caps.

To that end, we are scheduling a conference call at 11:00 A.M. (PST) this
Friday, October 27.

Lysa:  please contact folks on the above-list to see if they are available.
Assuming we can reach critical mass for the call, forward AT&T conference
calling information to the above-list.


This is all I've received on this today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/05/2000 04:14
PM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/05/2000 04:03:29 PM
To: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: areynaud@coral-energy.com, dwhaley@coral-energy.com,
jlshepherd@coral-energy.com

Subject: Revised GE Acknowledgement Letter

Attached is a revised draft of the acknowledgement letter which Tejas
would require from GE as a condition to closing.  The letter has been
revised to incorporate the substance of the changes which Don and I
discussed with Ben Jacoby this morning.  Additional changes to the
letter may be needed after Coral has seen and reviewed the Facility
Agreement.

 - 5wk8803_.DOC


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike & Courtney Grigsby [mailto:mgrigsby@swbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:17 PM
To: Grigsby, Mike
Subject: Yahoo! News Full Coverage-California Energy Crisis

  <http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/Business/Utility_Industry_Deregulation/>


No, sorry.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary Cunningham [SMTP:MCUNNINGHAM@isda.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 7:50 PM
> To: ISDA BOARD; Robert Pickel
> Subject: Capital One Bank
>
> Does anyone know Capital One Bank (Europe) PLC?  They have applied for
> Non-Dealer Financial Subscriber membership.
>
> The contact given is Jim Stevens, Treasury Analyst, located at 18
> Hanover
> Square, London.
>
> He says the bank is an end-user.  Identifies Capital One Bank as a
> credit
> card issuer offering other limited retail banking services.
>
> Thanks
> Mary


eBiz is one year old.  Happy Birthday to us and thanks to you, our readers.

In this issue:
Why deregulation is working in Pennsylvania
A London employee gets a cool car for referring a friend to Enron
Some interesting quotes in The Last Word

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com (http://home.enron.com ),
click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz June 29, 2001."


Sounds Good!