Telecommunications Reports presents . . . . . TR's State NewsWire
January 26, 2001 2 P.M. Edition

STATES
PENNSYLVANIA -- ALJ recommends splitting Verizon into wholesale, retail
affiliates
TEXAS -- PUC to take up 'slamming' rulemaking this summer
CALIFORNIA -- Resolution would give PUC staff authority to suspend
advice letters
GEORGIA -- Bill would give legal effect to electronic signatures and
records
FLORIDA -- NeuStar begins number pooling trial in '954' area code
CALIFORNIA -- ALJ addresses OSS workshops
NEW MEXICO -- Bill would adopt UETA
MINNESOTA -- Rep. Sertich takes aim at drivers using mobile telephones
MICHIGAN -- Ameritech study says consumers overpay long distance
companies
ALASKA -- GCI to offer cable modem access in Valdez

SECTION 251/252
PENNSYLVANIA
ALJ recommends splitting Verizon into wholesale, retail affiliates

Public Utility Commission Administrative Law Judge Wayne L. Weismandel
has recommended that the commission give Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc., one
year to create a separate retail affiliate.  The retail affiliate would
have to operate independently from Verizon's wholesale operations in the
state.

In April 2000 the PUC initiated a proceeding to determine the details of
the split, which it had required in its 1999 "global order" on telecom
competition in the state.  The PUC's global order determined that such a
structural separation "is the most efficient tool to ensure local
telephone competition."  Under protest, and after lengthy litigation and
settlement negotiations failed to head off the PUC proceeding, Verizon
filed its separation plan June 27.

ALJ Weismandel found that Verizon's plan doesn't propose a full
separation.  In October 2000, after Verizon suggested that the spilt
could cost the company more than $1 billion, the PUC ruled that Verizon
could present testimony "regarding the economic costs and benefits of a
full structural separation" but couldn't present testimony "directly
advocating" that "there is no need for structural separation."  (10/2/00
p.m.)

The ALJ found that Verizon couldn't support sufficiently its claim that
full separation would cost $1 billion and concluded that Verizon's own
separation plan "simply did not comply with the commission's orders."
Verizon proposed the creation of a separate advanced services affiliate,
adherence to a PUC-approved code of conduct, and the provision of
wholesale service subject to PUC performance standards and remedies.
But it "never produced a detailed plan of structural separation,"
according to the ALJ.

The ALJ also recommended rejecting plans proposed by AT&T Corp.,
WorldCom, Inc., the Office of the Consumer Advocate, and other carriers
and consumer groups.  The plans included the possibility of forcing
migration of some Verizon's current retail customers to competitive
local exchange carriers (CLECs) and requiring the newly created Verizon
retail unit to have "significant" minority shareholder interests.

The recommended decision concluded that the commission "is left with no
choice but to direct structural separation of specific elements as the
commission deems appropriate, as it said it would do in the Global
Order."  Wiesmandel proposed giving Verizon 30 days to begin a one-year
transition period to split into separate affiliates and to file a
detailed plan "allocating and identifying sufficient personnel,
equipment, and facilities" in each of its operations units to use to
create the retail affiliate.

Weismandel also recommended ordering the retail affiliate to (1)
maintain separate books and records; (2) have separate officers,
directors, and employees; (3) be prohibited from obtaining credit under
any arrangement that would give a creditor recourse to the wholesale
affiliate upon default; and (4) conduct all transactions with the
wholesale affiliate "at arms length," in writing, and subject to public
inspection.

Verizon Pennsylvania President Daniel J. Whelan said the recommended
decision was "totally unwarranted" and would "stop a quick-moving
industry in its tracks."  Whelan said that if the PUC adopts order, the
cost of operating as separate companies would range from $60 to $80 per
year for each phone line and ultimately would be passed on to businesses
and consumers.  Verizon also said the split could threaten about 7,700
positions.

A PUC spokesman told TR the commission may take up the recommended
decision "as early as March or April."  (Docket no. M-00001353)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
TEXAS
PUC to take up 'slamming' rulemaking this summer

The Public Utility Commission yesterday decided to initiate a rulemaking
in June to amend part of its "slamming" rules.  The rules to be examined
address the responsibilities of utilities initiating unauthorized
carrier changes and the responsibilities of the original utilities.
(Substantive rule section 26.130(f))

The commission decided to take the issue up after the Texas Statewide
Telephone Cooperative, Inc. (TSTCI) said the state's rules weren't
consistent with federal law.  According to TSTCI, the Texas rules depart
from federal rules in two ways: (1) under the federal rules, the
authorized carrier is required to make refunds to customers, while under
the state rules the unauthorized carrier has this responsibility; and
(2) the federal and state rules calculate refunds differently.

The PUC decided to wait until the summer to begin the rulemaking so that
any changes made by the Legislature related to slamming could be
included.  (Project no. 23375)

FUTURE OF REGULATION
CALIFORNIA
Resolution would give PUC staff authority to suspend advice letters

The Public Utilities Commission is scheduled to consider a resolution
during its Feb. 8 meeting that would authorize its staff to suspend
advice letters on behalf of the commission.  Regulated companies usually
file advice letters to make routine changes to their tariffs.

The commission said it was considering the resolution because, on
occasion, it's unable to complete its review and disposition of the
proposed tariff changes within the prescribed notice period.  In the
draft resolution, the PUC characterized the volume of advice letter
filings as "substantial" and said it would be "impractical for the
commission itself to issue a decision suspending each advice letter on
an individual basis."

The resolution would allow the directors of the energy, telecom, and
water divisions, or their designated representatives; and the executive
director, or his designee, to suspend an advice letter.  The staff
initially could suspend an advice letter for a maximum of 120 days
beyond the time it otherwise would take effect.  The resolution would
authorize the staff to suspend an advice letter for one further period
of no more than 180 days.  (Resolution no. M-4801)

INTERNET
GEORGIA
Bill would give legal effect to electronic signatures and records

Several senators have introduced an amendment to an existing electronic
records and signatures law that would specify that electronic
transactions are legal unless directly prohibited by the current law.
Sen. Robert Lamutt (R., District 21) is sponsoring the proposed bill,
which would amend chapter 12 of title 10 of the Official Code of Georgia
Annotated.

SB 24 would specify that the General Assembly doesn't intend for chapter
12 to be preempted by the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act, which allows for an exemption to preemption.

In addition, SB 24 would add a new provision to allow the use of
electronic signatures and records in accordance with chapter 12, even
when another law specifically calls for the use of a different type of
signature or record.  SB 24 also would repeal all laws and sections of
laws that conflict with the proposed bill.

SB 24 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Defense, Science, and
Technology.  Its text is available at
http://www.legis.state.ga.us/Legis/2001_02/fulltext/sb24.htm.

NETWORK MANAGEMENT
FLORIDA
NeuStar begins number pooling trial in '954' area code

North American Numbering Plan administrator NeuStar, Inc., this week
implemented a mandatory 1,000 number block pooling trial in Florida's
"954" area code.  Later this year NeuStar will administer number pooling
trials in Florida's "561" and "904" area codes.

SECTION 251/252
CALIFORNIA
ALJ addresses OSS workshops

Public Utilities Commission Administrative Law Judge Jacqueline Reed has
announced how she will proceed with the workshops addressing the results
of Pacific Bell's operation support system (OSS) tests.  The tests give
the commission information about whether the company has met the
interLATA (local access and transport area) service market entry
requirements of section 271 of the federal Telecommunications Act of
1996.

Reed said she would convene the Jan 29-30 workshops from 8:15 a.m. until
5 p.m. each day  For the first 15 minutes each day, Reed plans to
discuss preliminary matters and confirm issues to be covered that day.

Reed also approved a request by WorldCom, Inc., asking that reply
comments be due 30 days after the conclusion of the workshops.  Reed
pushed the comment deadline back from Feb. 20 to March 2.  The deadline
for replies also was postponed from March 2 until March 9.  (Rulemaking
nos. 93-04-003 and 95-04-043 and Investigation nos. 93-04-002 and
95-04-044)

INTERNET
NEW MEXICO
Bill would adopt UETA

Rep. Al Park (D., District 26) has introduced HB 232, which would create
a Uniform Electronic Transactions Act to provide a legal structure for
transacting business over electronic media.  The measure has been
referred to the House Business and Industry Committee.

WIRELESS
MINNESOTA
Rep. Sertich takes aim at drivers using mobile telephones

Rep. Anthony Sertich (D., District 5B) has introduced HF 364 to prohibit
drivers from using handheld mobile telephones while driving.  A law
enforcement officer wouldn't be able to issue a citation for a violation
of the proposed legislation unless the officer had stopped the driver
for another moving violation--other than a violation involving motor
vehicle equipment.

The law would exempt drivers who use wireless phones to contact a "911"
or other emergency telephone number; a hospital, clinic, or doctor's
office; an ambulance service provider; a fire department or law
enforcement agency; or a first aid squad.

HF 364 has been referred to the House Crime Prevention Committee.

LONG DISTANCE
MICHIGAN
Ameritech study says consumers overpay long distance companies

Laying the groundwork for hoped-for FCC approval of its market entry
later this year, Ameritech-Michigan released the results of a
consultant's study estimating that the state's consumers overpay by
about $1 billion annually for long distance service.  Stephen Pociask,
president of TeleNomic Research, conducted the study.

Authorizing Ameritech to enter the Michigan interLATA (local access and
transport area) services market could save consumers up to $1.03 billion
on long distance and toll charges, including $710 million on interstate
long distance calls, the study says.

Ameritech-Michigan President Gail Torreano said she's "optimistic that
Ameritech's application to the FCC bringing the benefits of full
competition to Michigan consumers will be approved this year.'

ADVANCED SERVICES
ALASKA
GCI to offer cable modem access in Valdez

General Communication, Inc., d/b/a GCI, has started offering high-speed
Internet access through cable modems in Valdez.  Tom Zulz, GCI
Valdez-area manager, said the service upgrade followed six months of
plant and equipment upgrades, which included activating fiber optic
cable servicing the Airport and River Robe areas.  Valdez is the first
community to receive GCI's high-speed cable modem service outside the
major urban communities of Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau.

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic,
without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays.
Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail:
jerschen@tr.com
Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail:
gkansagor@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com
Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax)
E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com


I meant to blind copy you on this.  Here it is...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000 11:25 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           12/14/2000 11:25 AM

To: Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:
Subject: Re: The Assistant's Party

Thanks for taking the time to send your note.  I am glad that the party was
such a success and that Heather was able to contribute to that.  Heather is
absolutely a wonderful asset to our team and to the company.  Thanks for your
acknowledgement of that.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Hillis                           12/13/2000 10:33 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The Assistant's Party

Sally,

I wanted to send you a short note to tell you about the success of last
nights Office of the Chairman Holiday Assistant's Party.

The party was an absolute success, but one of the main reasons why was
because of Heather Choate.  I sent out ONE email to Patti and she recruited
Heather who made huge efforts to get some wonderful gifts to be given out.

It is nice to see people truly going above and beyond!  She was a superstar!

Kim Hillis
x30681


I have heard through the grapevine that you produce a weekly status report on
the MG aquisition and assimilation.  Would you please include me on that
distribution list effective this week?   I believe that it is assumed that
Fernley Dyson will have day-to-day responsibility for this business once the
aquisition is completed.  However, in my role over Global Risk Management
Operations, I find myself fielding questions regarding our assessment of
operations and any issues surrounding assimilation.  Brent Price, who reports
to me and is on temporary assignment in the London office, has been keeping
me updated on progress to date.  His return soon to Houston, however, will
create a potential information gap that the weekly status report may help to
fill.

Thanks in advance to your attention to this.


Attached is our nomination form for the Griffith Power Plant for gas day
Wednesday, February 6, 2002.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!
MaryAnne Schneider
office #  801-537-3985
cell #    801-580-1466

(See attached file: NOMS_02_06_02.xls)
 - NOMS_02_06_02.xls


I am waiting on revisions to the Dynegy Holdings, Inc. Gty.  So if you can push on these folks it would be great.  I have sent the final draft to Nicor Energy, LLC today for their review.  The Nicor Gty is ok.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vanek, Darren
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	Status

Can you please give me the status on the grties that i sent to you for Nicor Energy LLC from Nicor Inc and Dynegy Holdings, Inc?

Can you tell me who is requesting an Enfolio for AES NewEnergy, Inc?

-d


Paul:  Please bring this to our meeting.
Stephanie:  Please update for form changes.
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 02:25 PM -----

	"Michael Stolfi" <stolfi_michael@jpmorgan.com>
	06/13/2000 02:49 PM

		 To: Susan.Flynn@enron.com
		 cc: Jeff.Nogid@enron.com, Rod.Nelson@enron.com, Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and Morgan Guaranty

Dear Susan -

As per our phone conversation of last week, attached for your review please
find
a revised draft (both clean and blacklined) of the Schedule to the ISDA Master
Agreement. The attached draft incorporates all of Morgan's comments and should
be self-explanatory. The motivation behind many of our comments was a
conscious
effort to keep the credit terms nearly identical to those already agreed to
with
other Enron entities.

Please review the attached and feel free to call, fax or e-mail me with any
questions or comments.

Sincerely yours,
Mike Stolfi
212-648-8231
212-648-5125 fax

(See attached file: Enron North America - MAS#3.doc)(See attached file: Enron
North America - MAS#3(blined).doc)

|--------+----------------------->
|        |                       |
|        |          Susan.Flynn@e|
|        |          nron.com     |
|        |                       |
|        |          05/26/00     |
|        |          10:13 AM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->
  >--------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                        |
  |       To:     stolfi_michael@jpmorgan.com,             |
  |       steuart_henry@jpmorgan.com                       |
  |       cc:     Jeff.Nogid@enron.com,                    |
  |       Sara.Shackleton@enron.com, Rod.Nelson@enron.com, |
  |       (bcc: Michael Stolfi)                            |
  |       Subject:     ISDA Master Agreement between ENA   |
  |       and Morgan Guaranty Trust    Company ("Morgan    |
  |       Guaranty")                                       |
  >--------------------------------------------------------|

     Attached for your review and comment is a draft of the Schedule and
Credit
Support Annex to the referenced agreement.  It is our intention to replace the
existing Master Energy Price Swap Agreement dated as of May 28, 1992 between
Enron Risk Management Services Corp. (now known as Enron North America Corp.)
and Morgan Guaranty  (the "Existing Master Agreement") with the ISDA Master
Agreement.   Under the exisiting Master Agreement, Enron Corp. executed a
$50,000,000  Guaranty in favor of  Morgan Guaranty. The draft ISDA Master
Agreement includes our updated form of Guaranty.  We can either amend the
exisiting form of Guaranty or amend and restate the exisiting Guaranty with
our
updated form of Guaranty.

     Should you have any questions or comments, please  call either Sara
Shackleton (attorney) at (713) 853-5620 (email address:
sara.Shackleton@enron.com) or me (paralegal) at (713) 853-0975 (email address:
susan.flynn@enron.com).   We look forward to hearing from you.

(See attached file: 181ctr.doc)

 - 181ctr.doc
 - Enron North America - MAS#3.doc
 - Enron North America - MAS#3(blined).doc


yea...probably get a little relief from the inspection report though


Andrea:  Would you please see that I am added to circulation of  the deal
transaction list (containing trading deals)?  Thanks.  Sara


Mark Frevert has none.

	From:  Mark Taylor                           06/21/2000 07:39 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore
cc:

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
09:38 AM ---------------------------

"Jon Schnitzer" <jons@amerexenergy.com> on 04/12/2001 08:22:39 AM
To: "Suzann Schnitzer" <sschnitz@jcpenney.com>, "susan schnitzer"
<s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net>, "Sandra F Brawner"
<Sandra.F.Brawner@enron.com>, <robert.k.rodriguez@db.com>, "Morris, Lamar
\(SUGARCREEK XGH 317\)" <LMorris1@pclient.ml.com>, "Mike Bilotti"
<michael.bilotti@capco.com>, <mhandler@natsource.com>, "lance jordan"
<lcjo@dynegy.com>, "keith taylor" <kata@dynegy.com>, <JSEGAUL44@aol.com>,
"john shaw" <john.shaw@glencore-us.com>, "jeremy davis" <jjda@dynegy.com>,
"Janet Schnitzer" <jrschnitzer@hotmail.com>, "gerardo ruiz"
<gee_ruiz@hotmail.com>, "diana hollier" <dhollier@energyusa.com>, "david
dunnavandt" <ddunnavant@reliantenergy.com>, "Chris Paul"
<cpaul@dwintegrated.com>, "chaw" <chaw@crcom.net>, "Brian York"
<byork@dwintegrated.com>, "anrew o ertel" <aertel@evomarkets.com>,
<allison_kushnick@mhhs.org>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Colin Powell's apology to China

----- Original Message -----
From: "Herb Lee" <herbl@amerexenergy.com>
To: "Jon Schnitzer" <jons@amerexenergy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 7:58 AM
Subject: Fw: Colin Powell's apology to China

>
>

 - chinese2.jpg


Attached is draft agreement - If possible, I would like to get this out to
Larry within the next hour ( I promised to send it first thing Monday am).
Thanks for your fast review.


Just a note to remind you that we are going to try and run a full DPR on Monday for today's trading.  Please remember to have your groups export the P&L files (all groups) and benchmarks (gas & liquids).

If you have any questions, comments, concerns, you can reach me on my mobile at 713 408 4315 or contact Chris at X33102.

Thanks

Shona

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:32 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Leuschen, Sam; Brown, Matt A.; Trevino, Susan; Ayala, Susie; Abel, Chris; Mills, Scott; Albrecht, Kristin; Miralles, Albert; Hall, D. Todd; Bruce, Michelle; Glover, Sheila; Carrington, Clara; Fondren, Mark; Evans, Casey; Swinney, John; Sweeney, Kevin
Subject:	FW: status update on the DPR

FYI based on our convo yesterday.  Please let me know if there is any info that has come up since we last spoke to lead you to believe this may not be possible.

thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:29 PM
To:	Abel, Chris; Andrews, Naveen; Apollo, Beth; Beck, Sally; Belden, Tim; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Bradford, William S.; Brooks, Loretta; Buy, Rick; Castleman, Kent; Causey, Richard; Cockrell, Rainier; Colwell, Wes; Curry, Wanda; Day, Misti; Delainey, David W.; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Gold, Joe; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Haedicke, Mark E.; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Hall, D. Todd; Hanson, Kristen J.; Hardy, Trey; Hayden, Frank; Helton, Susan; Hickerson, Gary; Hillis, Kimberly; Hodges, Georgeanne; Kaminski, Vince J; Kass, Michael; Kathol, Sherri; Killen, Faith; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; McKinney, Hal; McMahon, Jeffrey; Mills, Scott; Moscoso, Michael E.; Murphy, Ted; New, James; Piper, Greg; Port, David; Presto, Kevin M.; Schmidt, Darin; Schoppe, Tammie; Shepperd, Tammy R.; Talley, Darin; Ueckert, Allen W.; Valdez, Veronica; Whalley, Greg; White, Stacey W.; Whiting, Greg
Subject:	status update on the DPR

We have postponed issuing the DPR until the terminations that have already been entered into are appropriately reflected in the risk books.  My aim is to produce a full preliminary DPR next Monday for this Friday's trading activity.

Please call me if you have any questions or comments.

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123


Great, I've got it on my calendar.  I feel bad to see you leave town -
especially so soon.  dn

>>> Hain, Mary 03/25/01 04:36PM >>>
It will have to be lunch.  We'll say Tuesday at noon.  I'm flying out for good
on the 1st.  I'll meet you on the thirteenth floor.  I'll try to bring Pete
too.

From:    Douglas Nichols/ENRON@enronxgate on 03/25/2001 05:34 PM CST
To:    Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:    Re: Fwd: I'm back

That's really nice of you Mary.  I'd like to return the favor some time.  I'm
having a medical procedure Friday afternoon that I'd just as soon not describe
- except to say I might not be in too good a shape Friday evening.  Will you
guys be back in town after your trip East long enough to spend an evening with
you?  If not, let's at least do lunch some day next week - I have Tuesday thru
Thur open - and would love to have Pete join us - my treat.  dn

>>> Hain, Mary 03/25/01 04:09PM >>>
We're flying back East on Sunday.  You are invited to come over Friday
evening, if you like.  Some of our other friends have asked to get together so
we're inviting people for pot luck.  we'll supply the beer.  Feel free to
bring your mom too. Or we could do something else, before Sunday.

From:    Douglas Nichols/ENRON@enronxgate on 03/25/2001 05:02 PM CST
To:    Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:    Re: Fwd: I'm back

You're welcome.  I talked to Janet last night - would you and Pete be able to
make dinner at our house next weekend - perhaps Sunday night?  dn

>>> Hain, Mary 03/25/01 03:52PM >>>
Thanks for sharing.  She's just adorable!

From:    Douglas Nichols/ENRON@enronxgate on 03/24/2001 12:17 PM CST
To:    Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:    Fwd: I'm back

Mary,
I told you I had a picture of Stan's new addition - here it is.  dn

-----Original Message-----
Date:  03/09/2001  10:23 am  (Friday)
From:  "Berman, Stan " <SBerman@HEWM.com>
To:  "'douglas_nichols@pgn.com '" <douglas_nichols@pgn.com>
CC:  "'jim_piro@pgn.com '" <jim_piro@pgn.com>
Subject:  I'm back

Hi,

Over the past weeks, I have been staying at home with my new daughter (a
picture is attached, though it does not do her justice).  Monday, March 12,
I intend to return to the office.

My sense is that Paul Mohler has been doing a fine job running the rate
case.  I hope you agree -- if not, please tell me.  I intend to start
reintegrating myself into the RTO West/TransConnect work, and will call to
discuss -- I'm writing now to get you thinking about it.

Stan


---------------------- Forwarded by Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
11:53 AM ---------------------------

Deb Pepple <dpepplejes@netscape.net> on 12/08/2000 02:58:17 PM
To: Angie Barnett <angela.barnett@enron.com>, Cinda Beggs <Ckbeggs@aol.com>,
Karla Funnell <jimmie4ever@aol.com>, Leo and Sal Harris <lsharis@msn.com>,
Donna Hixon <dhixonhhe@netscape.net>, Laurie Lauer
<jakenlaneysmom@hotmail.com>, Jan Secor <JCsdaughter19@cs.com>, Marcia Tuskey
<NDFan-Ref@worldnet.att.net>, <bmetcalf863@earthlink.net>, <the.hen@gte.net>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [The]

____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://home.netscape.com/webmail
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from rly-na04.mx.aol.com [205.188.158.41] by mx01 via mtad
(34FM1.5.01)  with ESMTP id 915eLBq3x1160M01; Sat, 02 Dec 2000 16:54:49 GMT
Received: from  galaxyinternet.net (www.galaxyinternet.net [216.37.20.58]) by
rly-na04.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Dec 2000 11:54:38 -0500
Received: from Noell ([32.101.11.177]) by galaxyinternet.net  with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.117.11);  Sat, 2 Dec 2000 11:35:09 -0500
Message-ID: <003a01c05c7e$5adc5e00$b10b6520@Noell>
From: "Noell" <noell@galaxyinternet.net>
To: "fmf_1" <fmf_1@netzero.net>, "Earl J. Metzler" <ejmetz@msn.com>,
"Deb Pepple" <dpepplejes@netscape.net>,        "Cherie Fish"
<cfish30515@aol.com>,        "Kathy Spaugh" <KSpaugh@Hotmail.com>,
"Ronald James Fisher" <Ronji1@aol.com>,        "Stephen Rupchock"
<SRup49120@aol.com>,        "Toni Wise" <twise@galaxyinternet.net>
Subject: The
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 11:37:35 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

And God said, "Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding
seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit," and God saw that it was
good.

And Satan said, "There goes the neighborhood."

And God said, "Let us make Man...

And so God created Man in his own image; male and female created
he them. And God looked upon Man and Woman and saw that they were lean
and fit.

And God populated the earth with broccoli and cauliflower and
spinach, green and yellow vegetables of all kinds, so Man and Woman
would live long and healthy lives.

And Satan said, "I know how I can get back in this game."

And Satan created McDonald's. And McDonald's brought forth the
99-cent double cheeseburger.

And Satan said to Man, "You want fries with that?"

And Man said, "Supersize them." And Man gained 5 pounds.

And God created the healthful yogurt, that woman might keep her
figure that man found so fair.

And Satan brought forth chocolate. And Woman gained 5 pounds.

And God said, "Try my crispy fresh salad."

And Satan brought forth Ben and Jerry's. And Woman gained 10
pounds.

And God said, "I have sent thee heart-healthy vegetables and olive
oil with which to cook them."

And Satan brought forth chicken-fried steak so big it needed its
own platter.

And Man gained 10 pounds and his bad cholesterol went through the
roof.

And God brought forth running shoes and Man resolved to lose those
extra pounds.

And Satan brought forth cable TV with remote control so Man would
not have to toil to change channels between ESPN and ESPN2. And Man
gained another 20 pounds.

And God said, "You're running up the score, Devil."

And God brought forth the potato, a vegetable naturally low in fat
and brimming with nutrition.

And Satan peeled off the healthful skin and sliced the starchy
center into chips and deep-fat fried them. And he created sour cream
dip also.

And Man clutched his remote control and ate the potato chips swaddled
in cholesterol.

And Satan saw and said, "It is good." And Man went into cardiac
arrest.

And God sighed and created quadruple bypass surgery.

And Satan created HMO's.


Thank you for subscribing to the Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air Web
Specials Announcement Service.

Web Specials are a great way to save on flights with Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air. Web Specials can only be purchased online through the Alaska
Airlines/Horizon Air Web Site.

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air offer Web Specials for travel originating
Wednesday, 12/13/00 or Thursday, 12/14/00 or Saturday, 12/16/00, and
returning Saturday, 12/16/00 or Monday, 12/18/00 or Tuesday, 12/19/00.

Hurry, seats are limited, prices and markets subject to change.

The current specials are shown below (all fares quoted in US dollars)
without airport fees and segment tax:

Roundtrip Coach fares for travel between:

Anchorage, AK         -     Fairbanks, AK         -      $99.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Juneau, AK            -     $149.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Ketchikan, AK         -     $239.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Kodiak, AK            -     $149.00
Boise, ID             -     Pocatello, ID         -      $59.00
Boise, ID             -     Spokane, WA           -      $59.00
Burbank, CA           -     Redmond, OR           -     $219.00
Cordova, AK           -     Yakutat, AK           -     $119.00
Fairbanks, AK         -     Anchorage, AK         -      $99.00
Juneau, AK            -     Anchorage, AK         -     $149.00
Juneau, AK            -     Yakutat, AK           -     $119.00
Ketchikan, AK         -     Anchorage, AK         -     $239.00
Kodiak, AK            -     Anchorage, AK         -     $149.00
Los Angeles, CA       -     Portland, OR          -     $189.00
Moses Lake, WA        -     Orange County, CA     -     $209.00
Moses Lake, WA        -     San Jose, CA          -     $139.00
Moses Lake, WA        -     Seattle, WA           -      $59.00
Oakland, CA           -     Orange County, CA     -      $89.00
Oakland, CA           -     Seattle, WA           -     $109.00
Orange County, CA     -     Moses Lake, WA        -     $209.00
Orange County, CA     -     Oakland, CA           -      $89.00
Pendleton, OR         -     Portland, OR          -      $59.00
Petersburg, AK        -     Wrangell, AK          -      $59.00
Phoenix, AZ           -     Spokane, WA           -     $209.00
Pocatello, ID         -     Boise, ID             -      $59.00
Portland, OR          -     Los Angeles, CA       -     $189.00
Portland, OR          -     Pendleton, OR         -      $59.00
Portland, OR          -     Redmond, OR           -      $79.00
Portland, OR          -     San Jose, CA          -     $109.00
Portland, OR          -     Spokane, WA           -      $60.00
Redmond, OR           -     Burbank, CA           -     $219.00
Redmond, OR           -     Portland, OR          -      $79.00
Redmond, OR           -     Seattle, WA           -      $79.00
Reno, NV              -     Seattle, WA           -     $119.00
San Diego, CA         -     Seattle, WA           -     $199.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Spokane, WA           -     $119.00
San Jose, CA          -     Moses Lake, WA        -     $139.00
San Jose, CA          -     Portland, OR          -     $109.00
Seattle, WA           -     Moses Lake, WA        -      $59.00
Seattle, WA           -     Oakland, CA           -     $109.00
Seattle, WA           -     Redmond, OR           -      $79.00
Seattle, WA           -     Reno, NV              -     $119.00
Seattle, WA           -     San Diego, CA         -     $199.00
Spokane, WA           -     Boise, ID             -      $59.00
Spokane, WA           -     Phoenix, AZ           -     $209.00
Spokane, WA           -     Portland, OR          -      $60.00
Spokane, WA           -     San Francisco, CA     -     $119.00
Wrangell, AK          -     Petersburg, AK        -      $59.00
Yakutat, AK           -     Cordova, AK           -     $119.00
Yakutat, AK           -     Juneau, AK            -     $119.00

Additional markets are available at:
http://shopping.alaskaair.com/webspecials/start.asp. Check the Alaska Web
Specials page periodically as additional markets and dates may be added.

Web Special details:
Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only.
Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates.
Offer is for a very limited time and is subject to change without notice.
Valid on new bookings only.
Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets
require immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made.
Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services.
Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the
last date of your planned travel.
Fares quoted do not include Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $12 or
segment fees of $2.50 per flight segment.  A flight segment is defined as
one takeoff and one landing.
Other restrictions apply.

For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit
the Hilton Web site at:
http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html

You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service.

While we,d be pleased to continue to tell you about our great products and
prices, you can unsubscribe to our Email Notification Service by visiting
our Web site at: http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp.

Please do not respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot be
answered.


Attached is a summary of requests for rehearing pending in the Alliance RTO proceedings.  If you would like further information, please let me know.
Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596


Scott, I appreciate your note and I am sure that you will work well with
Chris.  I have always believed in your talents and capabilities - I won't be
far ....

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
05:52 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Scott Healy                           02/07/2001 08:15 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Congratulations on the new position!   I guess they thought that double or
tripling your budget wasn't a big enough challenge for you!  Best wishes, I
am sure you will be successful.  ENA won't seem the same without you.

I want to thank you about your advice on Calger.  He is great to work for.  I
am starting to crank again, just like 1998 (still my most enjoyable year at
Enron)

Good luck!


Thanks John.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	Ruben Lorenzo

I have spoken with Ruben this morning.    He is currently working in Structuring for Sempra,  focusing on the Ercot retail market.    Additionally,  he has worked for the California PX.    This and his educational background would have me recommend scheduling an interview with this applicant.

JFORNEY


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000 08:56 AM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
01/21/2000 04:57 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 1/21

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 1/21/00.

Regards
Molly


I updated deal 143709.

D

Susan D Trevino
03/01/2000 09:25 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Megan
Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Aquila Header (Meter #980072) - January Volumes

Daren,

On January 15 and 16, HPL bought some gas from Western Gas Resources at the
Aquila Header (10.000 and 5.000 MMBTU's respectively).  This was a late
Friday change so in order to get it scheduled in POPS, the gas was scheduled
on the stranger's gas contract.  However, deal ticket #143709 was never
updated to reflect those late changes.  Please let me know if you want me to
update the deal ticket.  Thanks, Susan.


You are correct, my apologies.

Best regards,
Suzanne

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Y'barbo, Paul
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To:	Clapp, Suzanne B.
Cc:	Maltes, Miguel; Tortolero, Elio
Subject:	RE: LPG Cargo - Oct 2001 - ProCaribe

Suzanne,

I calculate a total amount due of $1,839,120.46. That is:

	   932,967 gallons @ $0.46396
	1,625,526 gallons @ $0.41700
	1,679,706 gallons @ $0.39200
	   178,500 gallons @ $0.39200

Total	4,416,699 gallons @ $0.416402 average price.

Please confirm.

Thanks,

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clapp, Suzanne B.
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Y'barbo, Paul
Cc:	Maltes, Miguel; Tortolero, Elio
Subject:	RE: LPG Cargo - Oct 2001 - ProCaribe

Paul,

The invoices for this lifting were issued with provisional pricing on November 1 and I was assured that payment would be made on the due date of today basis those invoicese.  It has been evident for a while now that the prices for foward months would be going down, but this is the first day I'm hearing that ProCaribe wants revised invoices.

It doesn't need to be said that cash forecasting is very important to Enron at this time and based on previous conversations, I had confirmed to the forecasting group that they would receive the funds today.

The revised invoices will be issued tomorrow.  I need confirmation that the payment of the balance due will be made tomorrow, without fail.  Per my calculations, balance due would be $1,406,580.96 taking into account the $1,000,00.00 payment that was made today.

Please confirm.

Best regards,
Suzanne
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Y'barbo, Paul
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:32 PM
To:	Clapp, Suzanne B.
Cc:	Maltes, Miguel
Subject:	LPG Cargo - Oct 2001 - ProCaribe

Suzanne,

Final pricing for the subject cargo is dependent on Nov-Jan LPG prices. A provisional amount is due today. Please base the provisional amount on a Nov MB price of 35-cents, Dec and Jan MB prices of 32.5-cents. These prices reflect the current market.

Thanks,

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Monday, February 11, 2002 7:15 AM
To:	January, Steve; Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle
Subject:	Transwestern scheduled volumes

February 2002		Scheduled

Friday 08
West			 (1036)
San Juan	                867
East			   (315)

Saturday 09
West			  (941)
San Juan		   855
East			  (467)

Sunday 10
West			   (940)
San Juan		    854
East			   (442)

Monday 11
West			   (958)
San Juan		    873
East			   (441)


I wanted to update you on those Phillips deals that the counterparty is
saying are booked wrong.  I have left Gary L. a voice mail, but I have a
feeling I won't be hearing from him.  So, we might not be getting an answer
until next week on these deals.  The deals are; 131054 & 131048.

If I hear from Gary I'll let you know.  I'm hoping that they are ok.

Julie


Mark, further to our converstaion this morning, I attach the latest version
of the swap financing structure with RBC DS.  The idea is to have the swaps
prepay a funded amount which is then repaid through the swap structure over
the term of the transactions (1 year).  Please note that rather than
determining the one year PV value of the funded amount and interest at time =
0 relative to a fixed price, with monthly settlements then occuring in the
normal course based on market movements, I understand that it is neceassary
to have interest payments settled monthly with a bullet principal repayment
by settlement at the end of the one year term.

Some explanatory notes:

1.  Bill Bradford's group is putting the credit terms together.  Once that
occurs we will need to have drafts to RBC DS ASAP.

2.  Enron Canada Corp.'s obligations will be guaranteed by Enron Corp. to the
extent outlined in the credit worksheet.

3.  It is fundamental to the structure for Global Finance that there not be
any net collateral exposure.  In other words, collateral thresholds must
offset or mirror each other such that if, for exapmle, Enron Canada is
required to provide $50MM of margin to RBC DS,  Financing SPV will also have
to provide $50MM of margin to Enron Canada Corp., notwithstanding that Enron
Canada Corp. ought really not be exposed unless there is a market movement
having an exposure value in excess of the funded amount of $300MM.  (NOTE:
The actual amount required to complete the purchase of the PPA is
C$235,840,000, the first installment of C$58,960,000 having already been
funded by an intercompany loan from Enron Canada Corp. to Enron Canada Power
Corp.)

4.  In terms of documentation, the swaps should be documented under ISDA
Masters.  I understand that there may be an ISDA Master in place between
Royal Bank of Camada and Enron North America Corp. and also one in place also
with Enron Corp. (this will need to be confirmed).  As the transactions need
to be at the Enron Canada Corp. level, however, I suggest that ISDA Masters
need to be prepared between Enron Canada Corp. and RBC DS and between Enron
Canada Corp. and Financing SPV on the same terms as the current ISDA Master
between Enron North America Corp. (or Enron Corp.) and Royal Bank of Canada,
subject to the credit terms provided by Credit.  The individual transactions
themselves would then be documentd on transaction Confirmation Letters.  I am
not fussed as to who prepares the paper and it might be easiest for your
group to do so.  Please also note that external legal opinions may be
required in respect of Enron Canada Corp. and Enron Corp.  Blakes is prepared
to provide legal opinions for Enron Canada Corp. and whatever advice or
support is necessary.

5.  Once the funding occurs to Enron Canada Corp., it will be advanced by
intercompany loan to Enron Canada Power Corp. to acquire the PPA, and I will
look after this aspect of the transaction.

6.  Please note that Enron Canada Power Corp. must put the Government in
funds on Friday Spetember 22nd.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 09/13/2000 09:12
AM ---------------------------

Soma Ghosh
09/12/2000 05:41 PM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Andre Templeman/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Alberta PPA

---------------------- Forwarded by Soma Ghosh/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 06:40 PM
---------------------------

Soma Ghosh
09/12/2000 10:06 PM
To: Cris Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Alberta PPA

Chris,

As promised, I am forwarding details of 'SwapCo'. I would be grateful if you
would confirm that this entity works for us & resolves the 97%/3% hedge
issue.If you need anything else re. the entity please let us know.

Catherine will shortly forwarded the final version (hopefully!) of the
pre-pay structure as discussed in our meeting.

Regards,

Soma
---------------------- Forwarded by Soma Ghosh/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 04:00 PM
---------------------------

"Ellison, Mike" <Mike.Ellison@rbcds.com> on 09/12/2000 09:15:56 PM
To: "'Soma.Ghosh@enron.com'" <Soma.Ghosh@enron.com>,
"'Catherine.Clark@enron.com'" <Catherine.Clark@enron.com>
cc: "'Brian.Kerrigan@enron.com'" <Brian.Kerrigan@enron.com>, "McArthur, Ian"
<IAN.MCARTHUR@ROYALBANK.COM>, "Fleming, Blair" <BLAIR.FLEMING@ROYALBANK.COM>,
"Darby, Giles" <Giles.Darby@rbcds.com>, "Bermingham, David"
<David.Bermingham@rbcds.com>
Subject: RE: Alberta PPA

Soma, apologies, note that in the diagram there is no TRS between RBCDS & BF
Capital, just straight finance agreement.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Ellison, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:08 PM
To: Soma.Ghosh@enron.com; 'Catherine.Clark@enron.com'
Cc: Brian.Kerrigan@enron.com; McArthur, Ian; Fleming, Blair; Darby,
Giles; Bermingham, David
Subject: RE: Alberta PPA

Soma, as discussed, here is the proposed structure plus suumary involving BF
Equity Capital an unaffiliated LLP.? We believe this to solve the accounting
issues.? Please review and confirm.? Please also detail any specific further
information that you require to be happy with BF Equity Capital.?

Can I suggest that all parties have a conference call at 10.00am Houston time
tomorrow to ensure we have agreement on the structure and the way forward.

Please confirm

Thanks, Mike

--

?
 - Enron Canada - Alberta PPA -  BF Equity Partners 12 Sep.ppt


November 20, 2001
Southwest Airlines' Click 'n Save E-mail Update

A message to our Customers:

You can't mail a hug
You can't have a family reunion via e-mail
You can't taste homemade pumpkin pie over the phone

Some things are just better in person

Luv,
33,000+ Employees of Southwest Airlines

*****************Important Travel Information******************

For updated travel information, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/travelAdvisory.html

**************This week's specials include:*******************

1. Click 'n Save and Anniversary Specials
2. Southwest Airlines Systemwide Fare Sale
3. Subscriber Information

********* Click 'n Save and Anniversary Specials ***********

$30 - $99 one-way
These specials are available for travel any day of the
week with a 7-day advance purchase requirement.

Specials available this week are:

Albany, NY
 $59 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $65 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN

Albuquerque, NM
 $34 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ
 $99 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $63 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Austin, TX
 $61 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
 $37 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY
 $30 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia

Birmingham, AL
 $99 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $54 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

Boise, ID
 $66 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $48 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $70 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Burbank, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA

Chicago Midway, IL
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $65 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $41 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE

Cleveland, OH
 $30 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $63 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH

Columbus, OH
 $59 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $64 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO

Corpus Christi, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX

Dallas Love Field, TX
 $56 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $36 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Detroit, MI
 $99 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $52 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

El Paso, TX
 $61 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $56 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $99 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $56 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Houston Hobby, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $67 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $56 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Indianapolis, IN
 $99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Providence, RI

Jackson, MS
 $65 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $99 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

Jacksonville, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $68 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Kansas City, MO
 $64 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $36 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN

Las Vegas, NV
 $34 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $99 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Providence, RI

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $68 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $57 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY

Los Angeles, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $34 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV

Louisville, KY
 $37 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $57 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Lubbock, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX

Manchester, NH
 $99 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $63 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR

Nashville, TN
 $65 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $67 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $36 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO

New Orleans, LA
 $46 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL
 $46 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $30 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $48 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY

Oakland, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $50 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Oklahoma City, OK
 $36 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $60 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Omaha, NE
 $41 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $99 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Ontario, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $30 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Orlando, FL
 $46 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $30 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Phoenix, AZ
 $99 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA

Portland, OR
 $46 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

Providence, RI
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $99 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $52 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $99 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $99 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $48 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Sacramento, CA
 $66 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $30 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $30 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $50 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA

San Antonio, TX
 $63 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $60 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $99 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

San Diego, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $30 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

San Jose, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $58 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $48 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $30 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

Spokane, WA
 $58 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

St. Louis, MO
 $54 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $99 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS

Tampa Bay, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $99 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $46 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Tucson, AZ
 $34 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $30 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $99 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $56 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $56 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX

West Palm Beach, FL
 $70 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $30 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL

Details for this week's Click 'n Save and
Anniversary Specials:

*Available only on southwest.com.
*7-day advance purchase required.
*Available on published, scheduled service.
*Travel any day of the week
*Fares shown are one-way and do not include federal
 excise tax of up to $3.00 for each flight segment.
 (a segment is defined as a takeoff and landing)
*Fares do not include airport-assessed passenger
 facility charges (PFC) of up to $9 one-way.
*Fares are nonrefundable, but (except for tickets
 purchased through our Group Tickets Program)
 may be applied toward future travel on Southwest Airlines.
*Travel November 27, 2001 through April 5, 2002,
 except for December 21, 22, 28-30, 2001, and January 1, 2002.
*Purchase through November 22, 2001,  midnight Pacific Time.
*Fares are available one-way or can be combined
 with other fare types.  Most restrictive rules of combined
 fares will apply.
*Penalty applies to any changes made after purchasing
 Southwest Internet Specials.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=1120

****************southwest.com Featured Destination**********

This week's Featured Destination is the warmth and comfort
of your family dinner table.  We wish you many joys this
holiday season.  At Southwest Airlines, we are thankful to have
wonderful Customers like you.

Happy Thanksgiving.

**************** Additional Information section *****************

Additional information you need to know about all of our
air fare specials:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel may be purchased online using
 either a credit card or by utilizing funds from a
 previously unused or cancelled Ticketless
 Travel reservation(s).  Funds from up to four cancelled
 or unused Ticketless Travel reservation records can
 be combined to purchase a new Ticketless Travel
 reservation record.  Southwest Airlines travel credit
 (e.g., travel voucher, gift certificate, discount coupon)
 may not be used as forms of payment for
 Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.
*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods such as Christmas and New Years.
*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

********* Southwest Airlines Systemwide Fare Sale ***********

$39-$99 each way Promotional Fare Specials with 7-day
Advance Purchase for travel Tuesday, Wednesday, and
Saturday.

$44-$129 each way for travel Monday, Thursday,
Friday, and Sunday.

For additional information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/genmkt_110901.html?src=e1120

******************** Subscriber Information ***********************
Please pass this great news on to your friends.
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail
Updates, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save E-mail Updates.
For administration on your e-mail subscription, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/emailUnsubscribe.html

******************************************************************
You may retrieve and print a copy of your Southwest
Airlines Ticketless Travel at:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/retrieveItinerary.html

Questions about your flight arrival or departure time?
Please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/flifo/
******************************************************************
This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2001 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: tracy.geaccone@enron.com
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/


Hi there,

Just confirming a 200 CST Enron team conference call.  Is this going to work
for everyone, with the exception of Carlos, who is now excused?

Kay


UNFORTUNATELY!! work totalled interfered with my plans to go to the Masters
last weekend.  I was so mad I didn't even want to play golf.  I am over that
now and would like to play this coming weekend.  I can play Saturday morning
(need to finish by 2pm). or Sunday morning.   I will be out of town Wednesday
thru Friday so just let Cindy know if anyone can play.

Have a good week.


"how they met" brought tears to my eyes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	val.generes@accenture.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-val+2Egeneres+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 12:55 PM
To:	bcambr@lsuhsc.edu; lcentol@lsu.edu; nicholas.danna@ey.com; sdarrah@entergy.com; tdietz@marmac.net; gerherb@hotmail.com; Landry, Chad; Lenhart, Matthew; mmmarcantel@equiva.com; maziarz@bellsouth.net; AirPhotoDave@aol.com; SoCalCinephile@socal.rr.com; trahaniiid@aetna.com
Subject:	this one too....

http://www.weddingchannel.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+com.wc.OurWeddingGuestView.GOW_Main?accountid=2307481&STORE_GROUP=GA

___________________________________________________________
Val Generes
eCommerce Technology Consultant
Houston 83/75984, 713-837-5984


Shirley,

Yes.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
11/13/2000 10:20 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Subscription Renewal

Vince:

Do you want to renew?

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
10:15 AM ---------------------------

From: Susan L Kennedy on 11/13/2000 10:13 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Subscription Renewal

Dear Shirley:

Please let me know if Vince would like to renew these publications:

Journal of Finance
Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis

Thank you

Susan


Please see the attached.

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 10:04 AM -----

	Michael Garberding
	12/12/2000 09:52 AM

		 To: Cris Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morris Richard Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F
Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Chase Prepay

Included is an updated diagram of the proposed Chase prepay that includes
Stoneville - please let me know if you have any questions.  With regard to
Stoneville, Enron Hydrocarbons Marketing Corp. entered into an agreement in
December 1994 whereby Enron would sell to Mahonia and buy-back from
Stoneville (Stoneville Aegean Ltd) - a transaction very similar to this
prepay.  Thanks.

Michael


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 08/18/2000 11:01
AM ---------------------------

Susan M Landwehr
08/17/2000 11:36 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: O'Connor Op-Ed Piece - California

a little opinion piece from our friend at New Energy, Phil O'COnnor
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES on 08/17/2000
01:22 PM ---------------------------

"Fein, David I. - CHI" <david.fein@piperrudnick.com> on 08/17/2000 11:20:48 AM
To: "'Susan_M_Landwehr@enron.com'" <Susan_M_Landwehr@enron.com>,
"'rboston@enron.com'" <rboston@enron.com>
cc: "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>,
"Skey, Christopher N. - CHI" <christopher.skey@piperrudnick.com>, "Way, Karen
S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com>
Subject: O'Connor Op-Ed Piece - California

We thought that you would find the attached Op-Ed piece that appeared in the
Chicago Tribune today of interest.

PLEASE DON'T SHOOT THE MESSENGER
DEREGULATION NOT THE PROBLEM
By Philip R. O'Connor. Philip R. O'Connor is president of Chicago-based
NewEnergy Midwest, the leading provid-er of...
August 17, 2000
The firestorm raging in the San Diego area that devours homes and likely
will be followed in the spring by mudslides that will carry homes into
ravines isn't what Midwesterners are used to.
But there's no blaming Bad Ol' El Nino this time. The firestorm that has
everyone pointing fingers has to do with electric power shortages, rolling
blackout warnings and summer utility bills that have soared two and
threefold over last summer's.
To avoid "wearing the jacket," (in our Chicago patois), California's
voter-shy public officials and utility executives are blaming Bad Ol'
Deregulation.
Understandably, but regrettably, the media have tended to follow the story
line that electricity deregulation is to blame. Such stories could well
create worry that deregulation in Illinois and elsewhere in the Midwest will
lead to San Diego-style problems.
If anything, deregulation in the Midwest is avoiding the fundamental errors
California made, not only during the two years of deregulation but during
the decade preceding deregulation. In the summer of 1998 the Midwest had
some close calls of its own when triple-digit temperatures drove wholesale
electric prices for certain midday hours to as much as 100 times the normal
price.
The reigning theories in the California panic today are much like the myths
that emerged in the Midwest back then. There were allegations of price
gouging by power producers and warnings that we were moving too fast toward
deregulation--even though there was no retail deregulation and competition
in the Midwest at that time. In fact, it was the lack of retail,
customer-level competition that allowed the wholesale market to fly
completely out of control. Since 1998, the Midwest has begun to get its act
together.
In California, the initial reactions are to put the toothpaste back in the
tube and to burn the witch. But my native state still will need to face up
to its legacy of thinking, "I'll do that tomorrow," while at the same time
trying to regulate free markets as if there were no tomorrow.
Deregulation, which started in California in the spring of 1998, is but a
messenger of painful truths. The truth is that the chickens are coming home
to roost and that any attempt to retreat into the past will produce more
power shortages and higher prices.
There are some big differences between Illinois, the first state in the
Midwest to open up the electric network for customer choice, and California,
the first state in the nation to open up the network for competition.
In spite of a booming California economy spurring massive increases in
electrical demand, not one new power plant came on line during the
1990s--and none since. California thought it could rely on power plants in
other western states, but those plants are now serving growing loads in
their own areas.
In Illinois and elsewhere in the Midwest, new clean natural gas-fired plants
are able to serve during periods of peak demand. Gov. Ryan has convened a
committee to review state and local government handling of proposed "peaker"
plants. It seems likely to keep strict environmental standards in place
while helping to identify ways to reduce uncertainties, speed up
approvals--or disapprovals--and thereby reduce costs and improve power
reliability.
While the Midwest is realizing the benefit of newly constructed transmission
lines that allow access by Chicago and other areas to competitive power
supplies, many areas in California, remain too dependent on just a few local
power plants.
In California, once a utility finishes collecting "stranded-cost" charges to
pay off investments in nuclear plants and high-cost power contracts, price
caps for plain, old utility service based on rates in place prior to
deregulation are lifted. That's why San Diego Gas & Electric, the first
utility to finish collecting stranded costs, merely had the job of acquiring
power in the wholesale market and passing along the cost to customers who
had not switched to new competitive suppliers.
In Illinois and Ohio, by contrast, utility rates are capped at reduced
levels for at least five more years for customers who do not switch.
Illinois and the Midwest have stayed away from such Rube Goldberg
contraptions as the California Power Exchange that was supposed to serve as
a sort of mandatory clearing house for wholesale power transactions but
instead became a sort of private regulator that regulated no better than the
government used to.
The rules of the game in the Golden State could not have been more skewed
against giving opportunities for customers to switch to new competitors or
to take other precautions to avoid high summer power prices during an
unexpected heat wave. My NewEnergy colleagues in California have faced an
ever shifting set of increasingly inhospitable rules. In Illinois, utilities
and new competitive suppliers, have had more flexibility to offer products
that let customers choose between fixed prices that balance out the ups and
downs of the market or prices that float with the seasons.
Importantly, Illinois regulators have been reasonably quick to approve
proposals that let utilities and new suppliers, such as my company, work out
contracts with commercial and industrial customers to reduce their
electrical demand during peak summer hours in return for payments. Such
arrangements, less available in California, are key to avoiding blackouts
and blunting big-price spikes.
As chairman of the Illinois Commerce Commission from 1983 through 1985, I
remember when the costs of new nuclear plants showed up in electric
rates--today's stranded costs. I know what California utility commissioners
must be going through as they seek solutions for problems with roots going
back at least a decade. They'd better have thick skins and nimble minds.
I'll never forget former Gov. Jim Thompson, whose 1982 campaign I co-managed
and who appointed me to the ICC, saying, after several big rate increases,
the political equivalent of "I've never seen this man before in my entire
life." Having been yelled at on the bus by angry consumers a few times on
the way to the office, I could only be happy that Thompson had the good
political judgment to say, "I know not the man," on his own without my
prompting. I felt proud, not betrayed.

David I. Fein
PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE
203 North LaSalle Street
Suite 1800
Chicago, Illinois  60601
312-368-3462
(Fax) 312-630-7418
david.fein@piperrudnick.com

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


Michelle,

I have schedule with Twanda for Wednesday the 24th at 3:00pm.

Thanks again,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:06 PM
To:	Little Jr., Jim
Subject:	RE: Posting and the ADA

Happy to talk with you about the ADA -- I've actually written two papers on the topic and edited an article in The Houston Lawyer on your very topic (albeit several years ago, which was before the Supremes spoke on the issue).  On the Senior Specialist position, I am happy to discuss that with you as well.  Please get with my assistant, Twanda Sweet, at 39402 to schedule a time next week to talk.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Little Jr., Jim
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:02 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Posting and the ADA

My name is Jim Little.  I am a forth year Enron employee and a third year student at South Texas College of Law.

I am writing in response to a posting with your group for a Sr. Legal Specialist.  The posting itself contains no information about the job other than the fact that it is in the Labor and Employment Department.  I realize the expectation may be that I contact the recruiter directly; however, I felt efficiency would be served in contacting you directly.  I would appreciate any information you may provide including both duties and necessary qualifications.

I would also appreciate you considering speaking with me in the near future concerning a paper I am writing about individuals with HIV and the protections they are afforded under the ADA.  I feel comfortable that Enron has addressed this issue and I am merely guessing that you would have been involved in such discussion or have familiarity through your various writings on the ADA.  I am still researching the topic, so it will be a few weeks before I would feel able to ask intelligent questions.  But I would appreciate knowing at this time if this is something you are able and willing to discuss.

Thank you for your time,

Jim Little
x37703


Joe, thanks for the assistance.  We have a few items still outstanding on the
Doyle (Georgia PPA with Ogelthorpe) unit; however, It looks like we have the
'99 and '00 plants completed.  The 2001 program is much smaller.  I will
follow up shortly.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000
08:56 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mitch Robinson @ ENRON                           06/19/2000 08:38 AM

To: Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike J
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Fox/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Weekend Activity

Gavin -

The teams did an outstanding job getting the big issues wrapped up this
weekend.  All units at all the 2000 peaker sites can now be dispatched
commercially.  In Navy jargon, BZ!!

Though you and I will need to continue OEM discussions on commercial issues
and punch list items, ENA now has 2920 Mw's of capacity available for
dispatch.  This is a big milestone with significant value to Enron.

Please extend my appreciation to all concerned for the weekend wrap-up and
the extended hours required to make it happen.

Mitch


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000
11:23 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Andrea R Guillen                           01/19/2000 11:08 AM

Sent by: Andrea R Guillen
To: Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rosa
Jaramillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hannah Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alisha Guerrero/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, iguillen@aglife.com
cc:
Subject: FW: FW: For all my women friends(

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2000
11:06 AM ---------------------------

Margaret Smith <margaret_smith@anadarko.COM> on 01/19/2000 10:40:58 AM
To: "'Adam'" <funken@getus.com>, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'Bill'"
<WRSmith6@email.msn.com>, "'Charlene'" <Cbellows@Farouk.com>, "'David C'"
<rsi_railroad@getus.com>, "'Doug'" <douglaspena@hotmail.com>, "'Glenn'"
<GlennReev@aol.com>, "'Gloria'" <gmclissold@duke-energy.com>, "'Imo Gene'"
<peacock3@altavista.com>, "'Laura'" <lgarza@jcpenney.com>, "'Lisa'"
<Lmrpizza@aol.com>, "'Mykel'" <mykelanne@hotmail.com>, "'Olivia'"
<oliviar@hmi.net>, "'Paula'" <paula@firstclasslimo.com>, "'Ruth'"
<rufinita@aol.com>, "'Stephani'" <donsteph@flash.net>, April Leger
<aal001@DOMESTIC.EXCH.ANADARKO.com>, Dianna Bailey
<DJBAPC@DOMESTIC.EXCH.ANADARKO.com>, Dayna Dryden
<DCREXP@DOMESTIC.EXCH.ANADARKO.com>, Janet Price
<jkpexp@DOMESTIC.EXCH.ANADARKO.com>, Beth Friend
<EAFEXP@DOMESTIC.EXCH.ANADARKO.com>, Velma Birks
<VBILAN@DOMESTIC.EXCH.ANADARKO.com>, Vickie Tonn
<vlt001@DOMESTIC.EXCH.ANADARKO.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: FW: For all my women friends(

> >> From a woman who works in a police department:
> >>
> >>
> >>    I have to share some things I have learned in my job
> >>    with you.
> >>
> >>    In my job, I review criminal and psychiatric files of
> >>    imprisoned sex offenders who are approaching their
> >>    release date.  I decide if they are likely to re-offend
> >>    based on certain criteria and then civilly commit them
> >>    to a sex offender treatment facility if I decide that
> >>    they are at significant risk to re-offend
> >>
> >>    I have read hundreds and hundreds of files, and have
> >>    taken note of some of the mistakes women make.  Let me
> >>    preface this by saying that a woman is NEVER EVER EVER
> >>    at fault for being raped or attacked, but there are
> >>    definitely ways to reduce your risk of being a victim.
> >>
> >>    Here are the most common mistakes women make that
> >>    could result in them getting kidnapped, attacked,
> >>    and/or raped:
> >>
> >>    1.  Getting into the attacker's car when he pulls a
> >>    gun and orders you to get into his vehicle.
> >>
> >>    Most attackers don't want to shoot you ... they want
> >>    you to get into the car so that they can drive you to
> >>    a deserted place and torture you.  Don't comply.  Run
> >>    screaming.  It is MUCH more likely than not that he
> >>    will just move on to an easier target.
> >>
> >>    2.  Pulling over when a man drives alongside of you
> >>    pointing at your car pretending something is wrong.
> >>
> >>    If this happens, drive to the nearest well-lit and
> >>    populated gas station and look the car over yourself
> >>    (or ask an attendant).  Never pull over.  Believe it
> >>    or not, many women have fallen for this for fear of
> >>    their car spontaneously exploding in the middle of the
> >>    road.  Not likely.
> >>
> >>    3.  Not locking your doors while driving.
> >>
> >>    I have read several cases where the attacker simply
> >>    walks up to a woman's car while she's at a traffic
> >>    light and jumps in with his gun or knife drawn.
> >>
> >>    4.  Opening your front door when you have not
> >>    positively identified who is there.
> >>
> >>    If you don't have a peep hole, get one.  I've seen
> >>    countless cases where the attacker gains access to his
> >>    victims simply by knocking on their door.
> >>
> >>    Don't let an attacker get into your home.  He then has
> >>    a private, relatively soundproof place to attack you.
> >>
> >>    5.  Not being alert in parking lots.
> >>
> >>    If you go to the grocery store at night, don't be shy
> >>    about asking for an escort to your car.  Too many
> >>    women are abducted from parking lots or even raped in
> >>    the parking lot.
> >>
> >>    Look in your back seat before entering your car.  Cars
> >>    provide endless hiding places for attackers, both
> >>    inside them and in between them.
> >>
> >>    Be aware of your surroundings by looking to the left
> >>    and right and behind you with your head up all the
> >>    time.  You may appear paranoid and look funny to
> >>    others, but an attacker will think twice about
> >>    approaching someone who appears so aware of what's
> >>    going on.
> >>
> >>    6.  Trusting a clean cut, honest looking stranger.
> >>
> >>    I see mug shots of every sex offender in the state of
> >>    Florida.  They do not look like monsters.  They often
> >>    look like they could be your friendly grocer, bank
> >>    teller, waiter, neighbor, clergy, doctor, etc.  They
> >>    are every age between 15 and 90, and probably beyond.
> >>    Only a small minority actually look scary.
> >>
> >>    I just read a case yesterday of a man with only one
> >>    leg who beat up his victim with his crutch before he
> >>    raped her.  Who would have ever thought that a
> >>    one-legged man could be a rapist?
> >>
> >> 7.  Trusting people to be alone with your children.
> >>
> >> This is a difficult one, because child molesters end
> >> up being the LAST person the parents would believe is
> >> the molester.
> >>
> >> Most of the child molesting cases I see involve the
> >> stepfather, the uncle, the sister's boyfriend, the
> >> mother's boyfriend, the grandfather, the baby-sitter,
> >> the neighbor, the family friend, the youth camp
> >> director, day care worker, etc.  Although rare, even
> >> women can be molesters.
> >>
> >> In every case, the perpetrator is a nice guy,
> >> trusting, good with children, and the family is
> >> baffled or even in disbelief that the person could be
> >> abusing their child.
> >>
> >> When it comes to your children and grandchildren, be
> >> suspicious of everyone, no matter who they are.  And
> >> pay attention to what your child says and how he/she
> >> reacts to the mention of different people in their
> >> lives.
> >>
> >> I didn't mean to make anyone uncomfortable with this,
> >> but I am at work right now reviewing files, and
> >> realized that this email is a way I can reach many
> >> women at one time.  I have the dirty job of reading
> >> all these files, and it makes me feel good to know
> >> that I can share some inferences from what I have
> >> learned.  This is not an exhaustive list of what not
> >> to do, but just some things that I have observed more
> >> than just a few times.
> >>
> >> Pass this on to the women in your lives
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >


The normal process is to have him interviewed by three members of the Executive Committee who then confirm that he meets our requirements for being an Enron VP.  I assume you are asking us to agree to deviate from this process.  I am uncomfortable with that due to the fact that if the process is not going to be adhered to anyone can nominate a person for VP based on the strength of an individuals resume.  If everyone else agrees to the exception I won't be the one to hold this up but I don't necessarily agree with the exception being granted.

From:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 11:30 AM
Sent by:	Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate
To:	Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff Baxter/ENRON@enronXgate, James A Hughes/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate, Stephanie Harris/ENRON@enronXgate, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON@enronXgate, Dolores Fisher/Enron@EnronXGate, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie Blackwood/ENRON@enronXgate, Mrudula Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff Baxter/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Frevert/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicki Daw/ENRON@enronXgate, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kathy McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate, Raymond Bowen/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew S Fastow/ENRON@enronXgate, Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey McMahon/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey Sherrick/ENRON@enronXgate, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, G G Garcia/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Skarness/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen K Heathman/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/EES@EES, Bridget Maronge/ENRON@enronXgate, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Ford/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/ENRON@enronXgate, Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Laura Taylor/ENRON@enronxgate, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Suzanne Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy McCurley/ENRON@enronXgate, Marsha Schiller/ENRON@enronXgate, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Jennifer Burns/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kathy Campos/ENRON@enronXgate, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	VP Candidate Greg Shea

I would like to pursue an offer to Mr. Shea prior to the next Executive Committee meeting on May 7, 2001.  Please forward your comments or questions by Tuesday, May 1, 2001 so that I can extend the offer by Wednesday, May 2, 2001.

You will find attached the recommendation letter and his resume.

Regards,

John Lavorato

Tammie Schoppe on behalf of John Lavorato.


Kevin, I'll have a sedan from Beal's (713.731.9233) pick you up at the Four Seasons and bring you to the facility.  Once you get inside, there will be a check-in table - the ladies manning that table can direct you to Jeff.  Would you like me to have the sedan stand by to tke you to the airport or another destination following the panel (which will end between 9:30 and 9:45)?  Please advise.  Thanks, SRS

Kevin Compton <KCompton@kpcb.com> on 04/23/2001 09:51:29 AM
To:	"'Jeff.Skilling@enron.com'" <Jeff.Skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	RE: Dinner Monday, April 23

It would be a HUGE help if a car could meet me at the Four Seasons (1300
Lamar Street) about 7:15.  Just let me know, otherwise I will take a cab.

Where should we meet with Jeff tomorrow at 8:15??

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Skilling@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 7:53 AM
To: Kevin Compton
Subject: RE: Dinner Monday, April 23
Importance: High

Kevin, I got your message about not being available for dinner -  no
problem.  The other panelists were arriving too late also, so the dinner
was cancelled.

I just wanted to touch base and make sure you had everything thing you need
for tomorrow morning.  I'm attaching a map to the North Shepherd facility;
it's about 10 minutes outside of downtown.  I would be happy to make
arrangements for a sedan to pick you up if you like; just let me know from
where.

The event begins with a buffet breakfast at 7:30 a.m. and your panel will
begin at 8:45 a.m.  Jeff would like to meet with you, David Arnoff  and
John Thornton around 8:15 a.m. to cover any last minute items about the
panel.
I'll be at the North Shepherd facility beginning about 2:00 p.m. CDT today,
so you can reach me on my cell phone (713.854.1426).  Do not hesitate to
call me should you have any questions or need additional information as I
will not have access to e-mail after 2:00 p.m.

Regards, SRS

(See attached file: ypomap.ppt)


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000
07:31 AM ---------------------------

Julissa Marron@ENRON
01/14/2000 02:39 PM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana
Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene
Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Barclay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Marvia
Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA Obligations to CES

The following meeting is to discuss ENA's obligations to CES, please plan to
attend.

TOPIC:  ENA Obligations to CES
DATE:  Tuesday, January 18, 2000
TIME:   4:00 PM - 5:00 PM
LOCATION:  49C1

Thank you,

Julissa Marron


Wow! I bet you're sick of explaining that one to all the newcomers. That's
about what I figured was going on - an overlap of names used by different
members of the Enron family.

Thanks so much for taking the time to respond and explain. And thanks for the
welcome!

Kate


Please call so we can discuss!


Here's ad campaign that I found through Olivia( Davis's person in D.C.)
....if this is it , not so bad.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001
11:58 AM ---------------------------

"Olivia Morgan" <omorgan@deweysquare.com> on 03/23/2001 11:41:48 AM
To: "Richard (Rick) Shapiro (E-mail)" <rshapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: EFC Thank you e-mails to Board Members & Misc

Rick -  In case Enron wants to sign on...here's the info on the Energy ads
group I know  of.? The second attachment is a radio script.? Nothing
negative!?  Olivia
?
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Alix Burns  [mailto:aburns@technet.org]

Hi all,

1.? I have drafted an e-mail that should come from  John and should to go to
the Board Members who have signed on to Energy for  California. This will go
out with the attached information from Steve Lucas  about the legal/donation
rules for the organization and the latest radio script  (Rick -please confirm
this is it. We will re-name it.? Thanks).

Please confirm for me that all of the Board Members  agreed to write or raise
$50,000.?

<<Thank you email.doc>>  <<Hauck version of radio  spot- draft 2.doc>>
<<ContributorInfoPacket-Word.doc>>

Energy for California Board Members

- John Doerr plus

1.? Chris Townsend:??  tpa@sjrd.com
2.? Dan Case:  dan.case@chase.com?? cc: nancy.pfund@chase.com
3.? Reed Hastings:? rhastings@netflix.com
4.? Bill Hauck:? bhauck@cbrt.org
5. Carl Guardino:? cguardino@svmg.org

2.? Angela, can we schedule some time for me to come  to KPCB and get the
general e-mails out so we can wrap up our fundraising  commitment?

Many thanks.

-Alix

Alix Burns
TechNet
(650) 213-1177
<<Alix Burns (E-mail).vcf>>

 - Thank you email.doc
 - Hauck version of radio spot- draft 2.doc
 - ContributorInfoPacket-Word.doc
 - Alix Burns (E-mail).vcf


We have pursued implementing Unify in London, however there are a number of
issues preventing that from happening in the near future:

The Unify IT team has a lot of competing priorities (including the Houston
SAP implementation, as well as Houston and Calgary changes and enahncements),
and are unable to commit to a firm implementation date at this time.
New commitments by ENA (see mail at bottom) have further complicated the
priorities, so even the tentative plans for implementing Unify in London this
year are in doubt.
On the IT side, there are a number of issues with support and scalability of
the current architecture of the system.

As it doesn't look like Unify can be implemented in London this year, we will
therefore change focus to streamlining the existing tactical solutions in
London (enhancing Back Office Settlements System, integrating with Global
CounterParties, removing London Office Manager, and using SAP where
appropriate).

Once Unify has been integrated with SAP in Houston we will in a better
position to consider the long-term strategic approach to Unify in London.
If anyone believes that we should take a different response, please respond
to this email.

Eric, Ian & Richard

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Fernley Dyson                           17/11/99 12:49

To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Virro/LON/ECT@ECT, David J Williams/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth
S Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Unify

We need to discuss the details, but to my mind the question has to be why
wouldn't we do it?

Richard Sage
17/11/99 09:02
To: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Virro/LON/ECT@ECT, David J Williams/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian
Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth S Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Unify

Putting Unify in London is not something that is going to happen tomorrow.
If we are going to do it we need to do it right.
Shall we go ahead with this?

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

	Enron Information Technology

	From:  Inja Chun                           17/01/2000 01:52

To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Phil Yoxall/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen P
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT,
Eric Virro/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regan M
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beth Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Revised Unify Plan

During the last few weeks, we experienced significant increases in Unify
transaction volumes because of Columbia Energy Services acquisition, EOL and
Calgary implementation.   For example, recently the Logistics transactions
increased by 91% while deal/meter count increased by 61% and total volume
(MMBTU) by 66%.  In addition, it is very possible that volumes may increase
by another 30% due to  new acquisitions in the near future. For these
reasons, we  must put our efforts in overhauling Unify Settlement  now before
working on London implementation.  Therefore, we are postponing our February
out visit to London.,  We will let you know our revised plans and targets as
soon as we can.  Thank you.
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________


Attached is the latest  draft sent to Janel and the draft including changes
highlighted.


-----Original Message-----
From:  Lundstrom, Bruce
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Derrick Jr., James; Walls Jr., Rob; Haedicke, Mark E.
Cc: Rogers, Rex
Subject: Dabhol -- A Brief Legal Update

Gentlemen -

A few updates:

The power station and LNG contractors terminated their respective
construction contracts over the weekend.

Rebecca McDonald and Ken Lay met with the India Minister of Finance on
Saturday in New York.  The Minister reiterated India's position that they
would not buy any power from Dabhol.

We had a conference call with management of GE and Bechtel last week.  There
is little evident disagreement amongst the sponsors on key issues.  Bechtel
even complimented Rebecca on her team and handling of the matter.  Walter
Stuart from V&E came over to listen in on the phone call on behalf of Enron.
Given the increasing cooperation of the sponsors and written statements of GE
and Bechtel approving Enron's handling of ongoing issues, we have kept V&E's
involvement fairly "low key" to date.

Bruce


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
09:40 AM ---------------------------

Mark Kierlanczyk <MKierlanczyk@fmginy.com> on 01/22/2001 10:05:49 AM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Witaj Wicku!

Domyslam sie,ze jestes bardzo zajety wiec pomyslalem, ze dobrze bedzie sie
Tobie przypomniec.

Pamietam, ze masz byc w NY 13 lutego - mozemy juz teraz sie umowicna
konkretna pore dnia ale byc moze zobaczymy sie wczesniej.

Do milego - Marek


Data room will be, for now, in room EB 2180 and the phone number is (713)
345-3761.
Thanks
Ben


Met with Lee Hart.  Reliant is interested in bidding for the capacity being
auctioned on EnronOnLine, but will probably not respond until Monday.
Reliant is also interested in the concept of fuel monetization and will
definitely work with us to give shipper's perspective.

Attended meeting with Conoco (Carla Johnson and Mary Ann Pearce) and Steve
Harris, Rockey Storie to discuss potential settlement of Northern Natural
take or pay case.

Introduced myself to Cathy Bulf of Oneok (KN).  They are also interested in
the auctioned capacity.

Kevin Hyatt
06/22/2000 12:57 PM
To: Market Team
cc:

Subject: bullets

pls forward your weekly bullets to me by 9am Fri (sooner if possible).  Also,
include any marketing meetings with outside parties you attended and topics /
ideas discussed.

thx
KH


Start Date: 1/18/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Ben,

We need GE to give us additional last minute concessions requested by lenders
in order to get TurboPark closed.  If they sense that there  may be a
potential flip in the air regarding Blue Dog, the wheels could fall off the
wagon.


Got your voice mail message.  Just email your list to me.  Thanks,

Kim


Below are the arrival and departure dates that I have reserved for you at the San Luis Resort in Galveston for the 2nd Annual Accounting Leadership Conference.

	Arrival				Departure
	9/19				9/21

The 2nd Annual Accounting Leadership Conference has been scheduled for September 20-21, 2001 at the San Luis Resort in Galveston.   In addition to communication and networking, this year the focus of the conference will be on leadership:
	refining the direction and objectives for Global Accounting
	defining and agreeing on priorities
	improving leadership skills

In addition, the format of the conference has changed from last year.

The conference will be more participatory.  While there will be a few speakers/presentations, you will spend more time in working sessions focused on the topics above.

The meeting will begin at 9AM on Thursday.  The meeting should adjourn by 3:00 on Friday.  There is no organized dinner or activity for Wednesday night.

The San Luis Resort is located at 5222 Seawall Boulevard, Galveston, Texas.


Clickpaper Executive Summary for 4/3/01
Transaction Summary	New in Prior
	24 Hours	LTD
External Transactions 	4	279
Notional Value of Deals Completed 	$103,322	$689,838,435
Notional Tonnage of Deals Completed	460 tons	1,176,270 tons
Notional Board Feet	264,000 BF	23,972,000 BF
Notional Square Feet	0 SF	2,910,000 SF

Registration Activity	New in Prior
	24 Hours	LTD
Registered Clickpaper Users	1	442
Guest ID's Issued	0	2,429
Credit/Legal Review in Process	7	22
Credit Declined with Process Complete	0	11
Number of Password Applications Received	2	560

Products Offered	New in Prior
	24 Hours	LTD
Number of Financial Products Offered	0	60
Number of Physical Products Offered	0	69

Counterparty Activity
Number of Counterparties Having Transacted to Date	43
New Counterparties Transacting for the First Time Today	0


yes, lisa went to their lawyer (david) this morn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:28 PM
To:	Tribolet, Michael
Subject:

Looks like the market ain't crazy about our 10Q.
You get the go ahead from Whalley on PG&E?


Shirley,

Please keep it on your radar screen.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
05:15 PM ---------------------------

Sue Wadsworth@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
05/11/2000 05:16 PM
To: Mark Keeter/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Bloomer/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Arshak Sarkissian/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Scheduling a Meeting - Important - Please read

Scott Yeager has requested I set up a meeting for Mark Keeter to present to
the group his findings for the 6 month study of Managing Global
Network/Application Service Platform and include managing QoS end to end.

How does Tuesday May 23 in the morning look for everyone?
Mark, how long do you need I will schedule the conference room for.
Also please let me know if anyone else should be invited.

Sue Wadsworth
EB4590A
713-853-5105