Associate and Analyst Programs (the &Programs8) are administered globally.
Listed below is the contact information for the offices that utilize the
Programs.  Please do not hesitate to contact the individuals identified with
any questions, placement needs or hiring needs.

Houston/Portland/Australia

Celeste Roberts, Program Director.  Manages the daily operations.  Her
assistant is Dolores Muzzy and can be reached at ext. 3-6245.

Ginger Gamble.  Overall responsibility for Associate recruiting.  Candidates
interested in the Associate Program can forward their inquiries and resumes
to Ginger at EB1191.  Ginger can also be reached at ext. 3-7583 or by e-mail
at Ginger.B.Gamble@enron.com.

Shelly Jones.  Overall responsibility for Analyst recruiting.  Candidates
interested in the Analyst Program can forward their inquiries and resumes to
Shelly at EB1175.  Shelly can also be reached at ext. 3-0943 or by e-mail at
Shelly.Jones@enron.com.

Jana Giovannini.  Responsible for operations and expenses.  Jana can be
reached at ext. 3-9233 or by e-mail at Jana.Giovannini@enron.com.  Jana is
located at EB1187.

Shannon Rodgers.  Responsible for Associate rotations.  Associates and hiring
managers who need information on rotations and Associate availability should
contact Shannon at extension 3-3853 or by e-mail at Shannon.Rodgers@enron.com
.  Shannon is located at EB1186A.

Elizabeth Boudreaux.  Responsible for Analyst rotations.  Analysts and hiring
managers who need information on rotations and Analyst availability should
contact Elizabeth at ext. 3-6176 or by e-mail at
Elizabeth.Boudreaux@enron.com.  Elizabeth is located at EB1186B.

Argentina/Bolivia/Brazil

Miguel Padron.   Responsible for Associate and Analyst rotations, operations
and expenses.  His assistant is Rosely Nassar and can be reached at 5503-1243.

Disneau Santiago.  Responsible for Associate and Analyst recruitment.
Disneau,s assistant is Marlene Muniz and can be reached at 5503-1244.

Calgary

Dawn Doucet.  Responsible for Associate and Analyst recruiting and rotations.
Candidates interested in either the Associate or Analyst Programs can forward
their inquiries and resumes to Dawn in the Calgary office.  Dawn can be
reached at (403) 974-6724, the fax number is (403) 974-6985 or by e-mail at
Dawn.Doucet@enron.com.

London

Elizabeth  Barrett, Director of European Program.  She can be reached at +44
20 7783 7701.

Sophie Kingsley.  Responsible for day to day management of the European
Program, both pre/post hire, including Associate and Analyst rotations and
international transfers.  Sophie can be reached at +44 20 7783 7975 or by
e-mail at skingsley@enron.com.

India

Ranen Sengupta and Dick Liebert.  Responsible for Associate and Analyst
recruiting and rotations.  Candidates interested in either the Associate or
Analyst Programs can forward their inquiries and resumes to Ranen Sengupta or
Dick Liebert.  Ranen can be reached at ext. 6-7967 and his e-mail is
Ranen.Sengupta@enron.com.  Dick Leibert,s extension is 6-7145 and his e-mail
is Dick.Liebert@enron.com.


Here are a few of our pictures....

Eric


FYI.  CDWR bond and purchase info.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001
07:44 PM ---------------------------
From: Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/22/2001 09:04 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Mellencamp/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: DWR presentation (see page 11)


Hi Cliff,
Attached is a memo from Doak Bishop analyzing Enron's claims under our
political risk insurance for expropriation of TGS resulting from the stamp
tax.  We are asserting in our suit against Argentina, that the tax assessment
is an expropriation prior to payment because it affects our equity in the
company.  In other words, any attempt to dispose of the asset would require
disclosure of this massive assessment which significantly impairs the value.
Doak and I met with our expert in international law, Professor Michael
Reisman of Yale who believes and will testify that this is a valid claim.
Therefore under the policy, we arguably have an immediate claim for
expropriation against OPIC, even though we haven't paid any money. To avoid
waiving any claims, we will prepare a letter to OPIC requesting a tolling
agreement, so we do not have to file a claim or arbitration against it within
the period required under the policy, pending resolution of the matter.
Given the nature of our call with them this morning, I'm sure they will
cooperate.

I will arrange a call with Guido Tawil, our local counsel in Argentina to
review the PPI issue, and we will analyze the commercial policy to see if we
can find any coverage there.
Kind regards,
Michelle

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2Z#801!.DOC


Further to the conference call of January 25, 2001 with Christa Nicolson and
Cheryl Ann Merchant, please find attached the Interest Income Calculation.

Vanda Pearson
Assistant to Cheryl Ann Merchant
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
3500, 855 - 2nd Street SW
Calgary, AB  T2P 4J8

Tel: 403.260-9721/Fax: 403.260.9700
E-mail: vanda.pearson@blakes.com

This e-mail communication is confidential and legally privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone number shown
above or by return e-mail and delete this communication and any copy
immediately. Thank you.

 - Ice Dri1.xls


Nick,

Thanks for your message. The best date for a visit to Enron
would be Friday, May the 26th. Please, let me know if this date would work
for you.

Vince

Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 05/01/2000 04:26:30 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Visit to Enron

Vince,

How are you? Hope all is well.

Is there any chance we can schedule my visit to Enron on Friday, May 19,
or Friday, May 26?

By the end of April I was able to attract a top new student to work on the
project.
The other one for the coming year will be Giuseppe. By spending the summer
at Enron, he will be in a position to bring the new one up to speed and
create an intellectual team here at Stanford to look at these problems.

I must move ahead soon to put the project in place and get the work going.

Talk to you soon,

Nick

Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> Nick,
>
> We can close the loop on our commitment to support the research projects
> before your visit to Enron.
>
> My assistant, Shirley  Crenshaw, will call you to set up a conference call
> with me, Stinson Gibner,
> and Tom Gros from Enron Broadband Services to discuss all the isssues.
> Friday this week would work for
> both Tom and me. I think we need about 15 minutes.
>
> Vince
>
> P.S. Shirley, Nick's phone number is 650 796 8163 (cell), 650-725-5525
> (office).
>
> Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 03/12/2000 05:32:35 PM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, bambos@stanford.Stanford.EDU
> cc:
> Subject:  Visit to Enron
>
> Hello Vince,
>
> It was nice seeing you at Stanford and many thanks for the lunch
> we had together. I really enjoyed our discussions, both at the
> technical level and otherwise.
>
> I promised to send you an e-mail regarding possible dates for
> a visit to Enron. I delayed it for a week till my schedule was
> clearer. Let's see if we can get a match with your schedule -
> mine is rather terrible:
>
> Friday, 21st of April looks good. But April 23rd is Easter
> Sunday, so that may make it difficult for some people at Enron
> to be around. Let me know if that is the case. I am willing to
> visit then, because the week after that I am scheduled to be in
> Japan and in the previous weeks I am all committed on Fridays.
>
> Friday, 19th of May is the next possibility, but this probably
> is too far out. The main problem is that I am operating within
> a window of opportunity for attracting top students for this
> research. This window closes by the end of April, and it would be
> important for the student support funds to be in place then, so
> that I can make hard commitments to students and attract top
> talent. I am already reviewing files of students who have
> approached me for PhD advising, and I am in a mode of doing "soft
> commitments to star-level students" to get this research and its
> potential on their radar screen. Top students are highly sought
> after by advisors and I want to be an early player in this
> competition.
>
> Does my visit to Enron have to happen before we can set up the
> project and student support at Stanford? If so, doing it before the
> end of April is important for getting top people. If the visit can
> happen after we get the ball rolling, then we can schedule it in May.
> I assume there will be multiple visits both ways when the project gets
> going. Please let me know what you think.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Nick


He's re-trading on the retainage.  Let's discuss.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001 03:11
PM ---------------------------

michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 01/04/2001 01:42:58 PM
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com, Kay.mann@enron.com
cc: david.onuscheck@us.abb.com, karla.hesketh@us.abb.com

Subject: Contract comments

Ben/Kay,
After reviewing the contract with Dave we found only a couple of points that
we
would like to mention;
1) 1.48 the Maximum Liability Amount should be $768,000 USD
2) The unit will not be delivered until the last 10% (ten percent) retention
is
paid and we will post the surety bond as shown in in Exhibit D
3) ABB would not buy back the unit except from Enron.

Please let me know if there is any way that we may further assist you.

MIKE


To All,

I am sorry that this report is so late, the network link from Houston to the SF eMail server was down since sometime late Friday and this is the first time I've been able to connect since then.

Attached to this message is a summary of proceedings of the DSTAR Board meeting.  For those with little time to read the full text here are the highlights:

Board voted to make an Informational Filing of the TO Drafted documents
Continued funding of the DSTAR by the TOs, while it did pass, was tentative
DSTAR TOs are working on a for-profit Transco model governance

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Kind Regards,

Dave


i think i am going to fly in fri afternoon.  i am going to work in the
morning and then leave.  call me here at work and i will give you the fax
number.


Phillip,

I want to thank you for all of your work on managing the long term transport on El Paso.  You have done a great job.  Thanks for taking on the added responsibility.

Your contributions to the west desk and handling my bad positions will not be forgotten.

Sincerely,

Grigsby


We still have a few time slots available for appointments with Bob Brooks
while he is in Houston next week.  There are open slots on Tuesday (morning
and afternoon) and Wednesday morning. Please reply to this e-mail with
preferred date and time or call Bob at 323-663-4831 to schedule.


Dear Ken,

In preparation for our conference call on Monday, November 20, at 5:00 PM
EST,  I am sending along the entire paper for our discussion.  You will see
that this paper includes the Executive Summary, a copy of which I sent
before.  There is still some work to do on both the summary and main paper,
but this will be a good time to have a discussion in order to move these
documents along.

I look forward to speaking to you on Monday.  (Reminder:  the call-in number
is 888-622-5357 and the participant code is 550894.)

Best regards,

Jeff

 <<SEC Doc Draft 1114.doc>>

 - SEC Doc Draft 1114.doc


FYI

NOTICE: COH OFO/OMO

Date Issued: December 11, 2000

As a result of returning cold weather and significant under-deliveries by
shippers on the Columbia Gas of Ohio (COH) system, COH is calling an
Operational Flow Order and an Operational Matching Order (OMO) for all COH
Gas Transportation Customers. The OFO/OMO is effective on gas day December
13, 2000 and will remain in effect until further notice. If conditions
warrant, these orders will be lifted to reflect the changing conditions and
COH will advise you of such changes. Customer and marketer banks are not
available during the OFO/OMO period.

This notice is applicable to the Customer Choice program. CHOICE deliveries
should always equal the customers demand curve. The OFO requires the same
level of delivery, but the tariff provides for additional costs for failure
to comply.

Customers with daily measurement devices are subject to the OMO. Those
customers or their shippers are directed to adjust the customer's consumption
and/or their deliveries to COH so that their deliveries to COH are equal to
the customer's actual consumption.

Customers without daily measurement devices are subject to the OFO. Those
customers are hereby directed to adjust their daily scheduled deliveries to
COH so that those deliveries are equal to 60% of the customer's maximum daily
volume as specified in the customer's gas transportation contract with COH.

Those customers or their shippers who fail to comply with this OFO/OMO shall
be subject to penalties for the difference as provided for in COH's tariff.
COH will continue to monitor weather conditions and demand, in order to
remove the OFO/OMO as soon as possible.

If you have questions regarding this notice, please contact your Columbia Gas
Representative.


I left a message for ginger yesterday for lunch or dinner but havn't heard back.


Wanted to see if you guys had any comments regarding the questions I sent you
earlier today.  Thanks!
Ben
3-7998


Yes, I am going home before the reception and am going to have Katy meet me at the apartment around 6:15 (at least that's what time I'm telling her).  If you want to tell Laura to meet at the apartment around that time too, I will be there to greet her.  I'm going to drop off some dry cleaning, finish my laundry and clean up a bit before they get there.  I'm so glad everyone is up for this outing...we are so culturally aware.

So that's the plan.  I suggest we eat somewhere around the Museum District...I'll do some research this afternoon.

Talk to you later,
Sue


Happy holiday to you, too.  Is it too late to request that tonite's class
(Tasker--Financial Information Analysis) get taped?

Best,
Jeff


The 2001 Global Technology costs have been finalized.  As communicated in
mid-October, IT operating and development costs have increased relative to
2000 due to Enron's tremendous growth, e-commerce strategies, and expanded IT
services.  Please find below a summary of the charges specific to your
business unit for IT Infrastructure, IT Development, and IT e-Commerce
initiatives:

   2001 Plan
IT Infrastructure  $ 6,594
IT Development $
IT e-Commerce  $
                  $ 6,594

Attached please find the supporting detail for each of the major IT areas.
You will note the allocations include current year operating costs, as well
as, depreciation for prior IT capital expenditures.

IT Infrastructure includes services provided by the following groups:
Application Integration
Change Management
Enterprise Command Center
Enterprise Server
Market Data
Remote Systems
Messaging
Security
Data Center Facilities
Data Communications
Voice Communications
Desktop Support
Executive Support
Hardware Support
Remote Support
Trader Support
Resolution Center
Architecture

The costs associated with these groups will be billed based on the provided
plan amounts, with the exception of specific voice and data services which
will be billed based on actual usage.  Adjustments for variances to plan will
be made as applicable.  The actual usage services include WAN links, long
distance, and market data feeds.  An estimate has been provided for these
services; however, as these are costs which are controllable at the BU level,
each BU should review for reasonableness.

IT Development includes services provided by the following groups:
Front Office System Development/enhancement
Corporate System Development
Energy Operations System Development/enhancement
Intranet/Extranet Development
Market Intelligence

The costs associated with these groups will be billed based on the provided
plan amounts, with the exception of specific new development activity which
will be billed based on actual costs.  Adjustment for variances to plan will
be made as applicable.

IT e-Commerce includes services for the development, operation and
enhancement of Enron's web-based trading platforms.  The costs associated
with these groups will be billed based on actual costs allocated in
accordance with applicable service agreements.

Please contact Mike Patrick or Elise Clark if you have questions.

Thank you !


The Bib Cycle meeting date is changed from Friday Oct.26th to Wednesday, Oct. 25th at 10:30 a.m.  The Houston folks will  use Dave Neubauer's office 3963.  Omaha folks will use 696.

Jo will initiate the conference call:
Houston 713-853-7240
Mpls  952-887-1789

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gracey, Rosemary
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:17 AM
To:	Aschwege, Doug; Johnson, Robert L.; Sans Souci, Becki; Barker, Courtney; Barry, Mike; Berg, Vicki; Bolks, Sean; Bollinger, Joni; Bowers, Janet; Branney, Theresa; Brennan, Lorna; Burleson, Bob; Cabrera, Reyna; Cohrs, Allen; Donoho, Lindy; Dushinske, John; Fiscus, John; Fowler, Bill; Gadd, Eric; Gilbert, Steve; Halpin, Tom; Harris, Steven; Herber, Stephen; Hyatt, Kevin; Johanson, Tim; Jones, Dana; Joyce, Jane; Korbelik, Stephanie; Lagerstrom, Karen; Lantefield, Laura; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McCarran, Penny; McGowan, Mike W.; Mercaldo, Vernon; Millar, John; Miller, Kent; Moore, Jan; Neubauer, Dave; Neville, Sue; Oldenhuis, Frank; Paladino, Ranelle; Pavlou, Larry; Penkava, Loren; Powell, Don; Powers, Ken; Pritchard, John; Riehm, Richard; Roobaert, Preston; Sebesta, Chris; Semin, Frank; Stage, Michael G.; Stevens, Bob; Swett, Larry; Thomas, Steve; Threet, Kay; Valley, Lisa; Watson, Kimberly; Weller, Steve; Westfall, Roger; Wilkinson, Chuck; Williams, Jo; Williams, John; Cappiello, Deborah; Hook, Connie; McCoy, Julie; Ramirez, Pilar; Robertson, Audrey; Wadle, Susan; Wehring, Linda
Subject:	Bid Cycle Meeting

 << File: BID CYCLE MEETING NOTICE.doc >>

Rosemary Gracey
Marketing - 402/398-7431
rosemary.gracey@enron.com


Mike:

What's up, man?  I see you made it back!  Give me a holla or email whenever you get a chance.

Ben


While the Purchase and Sale Agreement has not yet settled down, we would like
to have the Schedules as complete as possible to date.  We would appreciate
your submitting any remaining additions, deletions or corrections to the
Schedules no later than noon on Monday.  Thanks for all the help.  Lance.


Please be advised that you may reach David Barbour, Danny Sullivan,
Chris Krecek or me in our Houston office after 6:00 this evening.
Muriel McFarling will not be leaving for Houston until tomorrow morning.
The contact information is as follows:

Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis, Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002-3090
42 Main Conference Room - (713) 220-4242
(713) 220-4200 (main)
(713) 220-4285 (fax)


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within
are forced or rescheduled outages. Your
daily delivery will still contain these outages.

In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is
formatted like your daily deliveries you receive
nightly. This will enable you to load the data into your regular
database. Any questions please let me know.
Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU
ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT
ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED
ENTITIES IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 020602U.xls
 - 020602R.xls


Gentlemen,

As Dave and John know, I'm working on a deal for ENA (and with Jude) which
has as one aspect a cost plus EPC contract for the construction of a power
plant.  We need to put together the T's and C's for a cost plus contract, and
since it is possible that NEPCO might be the contractor, I wanted to use
something that is acceptable to NEPCO.  I will then take the laboring oar in
order to get a working draft prepared for this project.

As always, I'm on a short time frame, so your response would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Kay


Yesterday, Fred Ni from the FERC called with some questions regarding the TW
options filing.  Most all of his questions centered around the determination
of the highest value.
 Bottom of page 7, last paragragh, we say Shipper call options will be
awarded upon the highest rate payable for the  option component.
 Then in the bullets that follow we say, based on the criteria known in
advance-  I told him that we would post the   elements and it would determine
the highest value.
 Then in the next paragraph we say again sold in a bidding process to only
those parties that place the highest value  on the option.
 Then on the actual tariff sheet, 98 we refer to in  33 c) method of awarding
options, ?? being is the highest value
 Then on tariff sheet 157, in the Option Fee section he felt we should refer
to the elements that make up the highest   value; volume , rate and term
As you can tell, this all centers around the elements of determining the
highest bid,  I advised him that it included rate, volume and term that the
option call was for.   We need to clarify these in writing as soon as
possible.  I told him we would do so in our answer to interventions.  He said
the sooner the better.  We also need to add expriation date on tariff sheet
98 c as to items included in the posting, since it could be different than
the exercise date.

I'd say all in all this is good that this is his only concern and that he
called before any protests etc.  He said he like the filing-  but was just
confused on what we meant by awarding to the highest value.

Susan, I assume you will be drafting the answer, although at this point I
haven't seen any protests, let's try to have the answer filed Friday or
Monday at the latest.    Please call if questions-  MK


Hi,

	How are you?  London seems to be the same as when I left in August - no sun, cold, serious looking people, expensive, etc.  In addition, we have had May Day riots, a post office bombing, train strike, etc.  Not to mention all the excitement in Enron Credit.

	It would be nice to know who I am supposed to be reporting to.  I am getting loads of conflicting messages - as illustrated in the forwarded email from Vasant.  According to you and Slava, the strategy paper/Duffie report seems to be a higher priority.  However, Vasant seems to indicate (in his forwarded email) that this is not the priority at the moment.

	In addition, there seems to be lots of chaos in Enron Credit - not only in the Houston office, but even more so in the London office.  This brings to mind a Russian proverb I learned from Slava when he expressed his views on the current state of Enron Credit - " a fish rots from the head."

	Finally, I would like to know exactly what you want me to write in this Duffie report:  Do you want to hear what Enron Credit would like to hear - that all they need is for us to develop a private firm model for their exisiting "infrastructure"?  Or do you want to hear what I really see, hear, read, etc.?  If the latter is true, then I may need to write two reports, because what I am learning does not look too good and would probably not make the Enron Credit personnel too happy.

	Well, I think I have said enough for now.  Look forward to your feedback.

Thanks,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shanbhogue, Vasant
Sent:	Friday, May 04, 2001 3:39 PM
To:	Mack, Iris
Cc:	Dhar, Amitava
Subject:	london work

Hi Iris,

	Amitava must have told you that both he and I are getting swamped with work here.  As a result, we expect you to take the lead in scoping the Enron credit project and making sure the infrastructure is readied.  You should also make sure to understand the econometric/data analysis software side of the project -- this is probably more important than preparing a document for Duffie right now.  You should definitely sit with Ben/George and actually run the software with them to get a feel for how it is to be used.  But we also need to be able to try out potential other ways of analyzing data.  Both Amitava and I will help as best as we can, and answer any direct questions, but we will have limited time to review documents, etc.  I expect Amitava to get heavily involved once data starts coming, but we expect you to have already set up the infrastructure etc for the data.

Hope the trip is going well.  Would you be extending the trip for some more time?

Vasant


More.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000 03:14
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
11/30/2000 03:12 PM
To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement

And now the exhibits.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000 03:11
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/30/2000 02:39:53 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement

 <<Exhibits To Enron South America Turbine blk.doc>>  <<Exhibits to Gas
Turbine Purchase Agreement - without notations.DOC>>

Attached please find both a clean and blackline of the Exhibits to the
Enron South America Turbine Agreement.

Please be aware of the following:

1. Exhibits B-1 and H-2 need to be added.

2. Does Exhibit F need to be updated and revised before signing?

3. In Section 3.1 of Exhibit K, the terms "Specific Date" and
"Recovery Schedule" are not defined.

4. For Exhibit T, please confirm that Enron has received all
documents that it should have received by now.

 - Exhibits To Enron South America Turbine blk.doc
 - Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - without notations.DOC


This meeting is to take the place of the Monday morning meeting.


Tana,

Can you get Mark an electronic copy of the True Quote Price Posting Agreement?

-----Original Message-----
From: Greenberg, Mark
Sent: Mon 11/5/2001 12:03 PM
To: Shults, Bob
Cc:
Subject: RE:

Bob -

I do not have the TrueQuote Posting Agreement.  If you could provide an e-mail of the final or hard copy that would be great.

Thanks.

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Shults, Bob
Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 9:08 AM
To:     Greenberg, Mark
Subject:

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Shults, Bob
Sent:   Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:35 PM
To:     McCullough, Travis
Subject:        FW: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:                                            Todd Creek

Travis,

Does this constitute a change of control of True Quote?

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Richter, Brad
Sent:   Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:51 PM
To:     Shults, Bob
Subject:        FW: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:                                            Todd Creek

How fast can you get me an answer to Louise's question?

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Kitchen, Louise
Sent:   Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:33 PM
To:     Richter, Brad
Subject:        FW: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:                                            Todd Creek

Doesn't this mean something under our contract?

 -----Original Message-----
From:   "Chris S. Edmonds" <chris.edmonds@truequote.com>@ENRON
Sent:   Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:12 PM
To:     chris.edmonds@truequote.com
Subject:        FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:                                            Todd Creek

 - APB Merges NEB 9-27-01_1_.doc << File: APB Merges NEB 9-27-01_1_.doc >>


Notice # 01-147
May 4, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX and COMEX Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Use of Letters of Credit, Certain Securities and Deliverable Warehouse
Receipts as Margin  for NYMEX and COMEX Transactions

DATE:
May 4, 2001
===========================================================

! Please be advised that the NYMEX Board of Directors has approved changes to
NYMEX and COMEX Clearing Association rules, which have also been filed with
the CFTC, that expand the types of non-cash assets that customers may deposit
with their Clearing Members for margin purposes.

! Specifically, the rule changes, which are attached below, permit the use of
letters of credit, certain securities and deliverable warehouse receipts by
customers to meet their margin requirements. The rule changes provide for
consistent treatment in the use of such assets for both NYMEX and COMEX
Divisions.

! Letters of Credit.  As a result of the rule changes, letters of credit
(LCs) now will be allowed for customer margin on both divisions.

! Use of Letters of Credit on Pass-Through Basis.  In addition, the rule
changes allow letters of credit to be used on a &pass-through8 basis on both
divisions.  In other words, Clearing Members on both divisions will be able
to pledge to the applicable clearinghouse certain LCs posted by customers. It
should be noted that while securities and deliverable warehouse receipts, as
detailed below, may be used by customers for margin purposes, such assets may
not be used on a pass-through basis by a Clearing Member to meet its margin
obligations with the clearinghouse.

! Securities. Customers also will be able to deposit with their Clearing
Members certain types of securities as margin. The types of acceptable
securities are the kinds of securities that have been accepted for some time
on the COMEX Division.  Specifically, the rule changes will permit customers
to deposit the following types of securities as margin with Clearing Members
on either division:

securities listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. or the
American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the over-the-counter
market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
Board except that such securities must be free from liens and encumbrances;
can represent no more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of any one
issuer; and will be valued for purposes of margin at 75% of their market
value.

! Deliverable Warehouse Receipts. On both divisions, deliverable warehouse
receipts for any of the commodities traded on the Exchange will be accepted
as customer margin provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no
more than 75% of the value of the commodity.

! Effective Date. These rule changes will go into effect on June 1, 2001.

! Exchange Form for Pass-Through Letters of Credit.  A follow-up Notice to
Clearing Members will be distributed shortly that will include a form
prepared by NYMEX that will serve as the authorized  uniform form for
irrevocable letters of credit for use on a pass-through basis at the Exchange
.

If you have any questions concerning this change, please contact Bernard
Purta, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Operations, at (212)
299- 2380; Arthur McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance Section,
NYMEX Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2928; or Joseph Sanguedolce,
Director, Financial Surveillance Section, NYMEX Compliance Department, at
(212) 299-2855,.

AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 4.01 (&CUSTOMER,S MARGINS8), NYMEX RULE 9.05
(&MARGINS8) AND TO COMEX CLEARING ASSOCIATION RULE 48 (&DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES
AND LETTERS OF CREDIT AS ORIGINAL MARGIN8)

(Asterisks indicate additions; brackets indicate deletions.)

Rule 4.01. CUSTOMER'S MARGINS

(A) Initial margin at least equal to the level set for customers shall be
required of all customers. In no case shall a customer's initial margin be
less than a specified amount per contract, or a specified percentage of the
market value at which any commodity is bought or sold, such customer's margin
to be determined and announced by the Board of Directors or its designee.

 (B) Once the required initial margin has been deposited for each individual
transaction, such trade and such margin shall, for the purposes of this rule,
lose their individual identity and be commingled with all other trades and
margins in the same commodity for the same customer account.

 (C) When the margin (Net Liquidating Value plus Non-Cash Deposits) in a
customer's account declines below the maintenance margin requirement
applicable to the open positions carried in such account, the Member Firm
carrying said account is required to collect (call) from the customer such
funds, which when deposited, will restore it to the then prevailing initial
margin requirement.

 (D) A Member Firm shall not accept orders for new trades on behalf of an
undermargined customer account other than those which reduce its initial
margin requirement unless such Member Firm has been given assurances by said
customer that funds sufficient to restore the account to its then prevailing
initial margin requirement are forthcoming and will be received in a
reasonable amount of time not to exceed one business day for Floor Members
and three business days for all other customers.

(E)(1) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open NYMEX Division positions:

 (a) United States Currency; or any currency freely convertible to United
States currency; provided that if foreign currency is deposited, its value
shall be calculated so that at the current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar
equivalent of the foreign currency satisfies the customer's margin obligation.

 (b) securities issued by the Department of the Treasury of the United States
maturing within ten (10) years of the date of the deposit and guaranteed as
to principal and interest by the United States Government. Such securities
shall be valued at ninety five percent (95%) of par value.

*(c) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(d) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.

(e) deliverable warehouse receipts for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity.*

[(c)] *(f)* The net liquidating value in a customer's account over the
initial margin requirements for the positions carried for such account.

(2) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open COMEX Division positions:

(a) United States currency, checks payable in United States currency, or
currency freely convertible to United States currency; provided that if
foreign currency is deposited, its value shall be calculated so that at the
current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar equivalent of the foreign currency
satisfies the customer's margin obligations;

(b) the net liquidating value in a customer's account over the initial margin
requirements for the positions carried for such account;

(c) securities issued or guaranteed by the United States, provided that such
securities shall be valued at the lower of the par or market value thereof;

(d) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(e) *deliverable* warehouse receipts *for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity*; [provided that such warehouse receipts shall be
valued in accordance with the following:

(i) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the commodity
underlying either the futures contract sold or the futures contract which is
the subject of the call options sold, not more than 90% of the value of the
commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(ii) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the futures
contract purchased or the put options sold, not more than 75% of the value of
the commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(iii) if the warehouse receipt is for either: (A) deliverable grade of a
commodity other than the commodity underlying the futures contract or option
to be margined; or (B) a form of silver or gold not deliverable under a
futures contract, then not more than 75% of the value of the warehouse
receipt may be considered as margin.]

(f) physical commodities (but not forward contracts therefor) if the carrying
member is in possession and control of negotiable documents covering such
commodities, provided, however, that the value of such commodities shall be
based upon the contract market price for the grade of such commodity or if
the commodity is not of a grade deliverable on a contract market, then at the
price for the grade of such commodity on the spot market;

(g) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account*, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be* issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members *or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.*

 (3) Calls issued by Member Firms for additional margin from customers may
only be met by: deposits conforming to the requirements of Rule 4.01(E)(1)
for open NYMEX Division positions, or conforming to the requirements of Rule
4.01(E)(2) for open COMEX Division positions, or, for open positions on
either division of the Exchange, favorable market movements which, when taken
into consideration and combined with any other monies available, enable the
customer's margin to equal or exceed the then prevailing initial margin
requirement.

 (F) Withdrawals of margin from a customer's account may only be permitted by
a Member Firm carrying such account if the remaining funds in such account
are equal to or in excess of the then prevailing initial margin required of
the applicable open positions at the time of said withdrawal request.

(G) The customer's response to a margin call issued by a Member Firm must be
timely and complete. A Member Firm may call, at any time, for margins above
and beyond the minimums required by the Exchange. A Member Firm may liquidate
any or all positions maintained by a customer for failure to meet a margin
call. The customer will be liable for any loss or deficiency resulting
therefrom.

 (H) The margin requirements established by the Board or its designee may
vary for different commodities and may be changed from time to time by the
Board or its designee, and in the discretion of the Board or its designee,
may be made applicable to all open trades as well as new trades.

 (I) Arbitrage

(1) For the purposes of Exchange margin requirements, an arbitrage position
is a purchase or sale of an Exchange futures contract in one delivery month
which futures contract is offset by a futures contract to sell or to purchase
a similar quantity of a related commodity in the same or different delivery
month which offsetting futures contract is executed on or subject to the
rules of a different exchange. In order to qualify as an arbitrage position,
each contract long and short must be carried by the same member firm for the
same account.

(2) The Board of Directors, by resolution, may identify those futures
contracts, that are executable on and/or subject to the rules of a different
exchange, which shall be deemed to qualify as part of an arbitrage position.

(3) The Board of Directors or its designee may set levels of margin for
arbitrage positions at a rate less than applicable to outright positions;
provided, however, that except for interdivision straddles, no such rate
shall be lower than the rates established for clearing members' margins.

Rule 9.05. MARGINS

* * * *
(E) Clearing Members may meet original margin calls by depositing:

(1) Cash (U.S. Currency);

(2) Original Margin Certificates issued by an original margin depository, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, for delivery to the order of the
Clearing House, representing securities issued by the Department of Treasury
of the United States of America maturing within ten (10) years from the date
of the deposit and guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United
States Government; such securities shall be valued at ninety five percent
(95%) of the par value; or

(3) Subject to a maximum limit of 50% of the Clearing Member's total original
margin obligations, Irrevocable Letters of Credit payable to the order of the
Clearing House *including such Letters of Credit that are deposited with the
Clearing Member in accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, issued by or confirmed by an original
margin depository and having an expiration date of not less than three (3) or
more than eighteen (18) months from the date of issuance; provided, however,
that such Letter of Credit may not be used to meet original margin
obligations during the fifteen calendar days prior to the expiration date
thereof (if the fifteenth day prior to the expiration of the Letter of Credit
is not a business day, the period during which such Letter of Credit may not
be used to meet original margin obligations shall begin on the business day
immediately preceding that day); and, provided further, that on the business
d!
ay!
 preceding the fifteenth calendar day prior to the expiration of the Letter
of Credit, the Clearing House shall issue a call for original margin to be
deposited in a form and manner acceptable to the Clearing House for positions
held open as of the close of business on that day and margined by the Letter
of Credit. The Clearing House shall have the unqualified right to call on any
Letter of Credit at any time prior to expiration.

CCA Rule 48. DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES AND LETTERS OF CREDIT A ORIGINAL MARGIN

* * * *
(b) Irrevocable Letters of Credit.

(i) The Corporation will accept as original margin for the full face amount
thereof a letter of credit in favor of the Corporation issued by any
institution selected by the depositor *including such Letters of Credit in
favor of the Corporation that are deposited with the Clearing Member in
accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, provided that

(A) such  institution has been approved by the Board as an approved
depository or such institution is organized under the laws of the United
States or the laws of any state and the letter of credit issued by such
institution has been confirmed by an approved depository;
(B) that the aggregate amount of letters of credit which may be accepted at
any time from any one approved depository, or for the account of any one
Clearing Member may be limited by the Board from time to time;
(C) that a letter of credit issued on behalf of a Clearing Member by an
institution which is an affiliated firm of such Clearing Member must be
confirmed by an institution which is not an affiliated firm of such Clearing
Member; and
(D) such letter of credit shall be in form and substance approved by the
Board and shall be in such denominations as may be determined by the Board
from time to time; shall be irrevocable, shall be available to be drawn upon
by the Corporation by  a clean sight draft(s) or written demand(s) and shall
run for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of issue.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-147)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000
08:04 AM ---------------------------

Patrice L Mims
09/12/2000 05:06 PM
To: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Product Description

Hey Melba,

This is the description I need for the new product:

The interconnection between Alliance Pipeline Company and ANR Pipeline
Company located in Will County, Illinois

I need this product set up ASAP, so let me know.

Thanks so much and sorry for the rush!!!!


assuming we're driving the car to dallas tomorrow after work...


The Enron stock price has been pretty cruel.
I hope you and the others did not get hurt to bad.
If I had not left I would have been there with you
guys from now on.
How is Butch doing?
I have not had a report on him in some time.
Keep your chin up and do make contact from time to
time.
Rick Cates

--- Larry.Campbell@enron.com wrote:
>
> Thanks Rick I needed some cruel humor to get my day
> going......
>
>
>
>
> Rick Cates <rd_cates@yahoo.com> on 11/21/2001
> 06:20:13 PM
>
> To:   ronnir brickman <ronnie.brickman@enron.com>,
> Guy Bruner
>       <jbruner@socket.net>, Larry Campbell
> <larry.campbell@enron.com>,
>       "C?C" Gerald <ccgerald@hotmail.com>, Chris
> Gerald
>       <ccgerald@yahoo.com>, Carol Gillaspie-Nygren
> <cfgillaspi@aol.com>,
>       steve haug <steven.haug@enron.com>, Steve Haug
> <gail.steve@home.com>,
>       Ben Howard <bhoward@pan-tex.net>, Bill Jones
>       <bill_jones@email.mobil.com>, rick loveless
>       <rick.loveless@enron.com>, Leo Nichols
> <leo.nichols@enron.com>, John
>       Rose <jayhawk16556@juno.com>
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Fwd: Fw: Fwd: Fw: husband
>
>
> >       -Subject: Fwd: Fw: husband
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >       > > > > > > > If this doesn't make you cry
> for
> > laughing so
> >       > > > > hard, let me know and
> >       > > > > > > > I'll pray for
> >       > > > > > > > you. This is a story about a
> > couple who had
> >       > > > > been happily married
> >       > > > > for
> >       > > > > > > > years.
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > The only friction in their
> > marriage was the
> >       > > > > husband's habit of
> >       > > > > farting
> >       > > > > > > > loudly
> >       > > > > > > > every morning when he awoke.
> The
> > noise
> >       > > > > would wake his wife and the
> >       > > > > > > > smell
> >       > > > > > > > would make her eyes water and
> > make her gasp
> >       > > > > for air.
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > Every morning she would plead
> > with him to
> >       > > > > stop ripping them off
> >       > > > > > > > because it
> >       > > > > > > > was making her sick. He told
> her
> > he
> >       > > > > couldn't stop it and that it
> >       > > > > was
> >       > > > > > > > perfectly
> >       > > > > > > > natural. She told him to see a
> > doctor; she
> >       > > > > was concerned that one
> >       > > > > day
> >       > > > > > > > he
> >       > > > > > > > would blow his guts out.
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > The years when by and he
> > continued to rip
> >       > > > > them out! Then one
> >       > > > > > > > Thanksgiving
> >       > > > > > > > morning as she was preparing
> the
> > turkey for
> >       > > > > dinner and he was
> >       > > > > upstairs
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > sound asleep, she looked at
> the
> > bowl where
> >       > > > > she had put the turkey
> >       > > > > > > > innards
> >       > > > > > > > and neck, gizzard, liver and
> all
> > the spare
> >       > > > > parts and a malicious
> >       > > > > > > > thought came
> >       > > > > > > > to her.
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > She took the bowl and went
> > upstairs where
> >       > > > > her husband was sound
> >       > > > > asleep
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > and,
> >       > > > > > > > gently pulling back the bed
> > covers, she
> >       > > > > pulled back the elastic
> >       > > > > > > > waistband of
> >       > > > > > > > his underpants and emptied the
> > bowl of
> >       > > > > turkey guts into his shorts.
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > Some time later she heard her
> > husband waken
> >       > > > > with his usual
> >       > > > > trumpeting
> >       > > > > > > > which was followed by a blood
> > curdling
> >       > > > > scream and the sound of
> >       > > > > frantic
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > footsteps as he ran into the
> > bathroom.
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > The wife could hardly control
> > herself as she
> >       > > > > rolled on the floor
> >       > > > > > > > laughing, tears
> >       > > > > > > > in her eyes! After years of
> > torture she
> >       > > > > reckoned she had got him
> >       > > > > back
> >       > > > > > > > pretty
> >       > > > > > > > good.
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > About twenty minutes later,
> her
> > husband came
> >       > > > > downstairs in his
> >       > > > > > > > bloodstained
> >       > > > > > > > underpants with a look of
> horror
> > on his
> >       > > > > face.
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > She bit her lip as she asked
> him
> > what was
> >       > > > > the matter. He said,
> >       > > > > > > > "Honey, you
> >       > > > > > > > were right. All these years
> you
> > have warned
> >       > > > > me and I didn't listen
> >       > > > > to
> >       > > > > > > > you."
> >       > > > > > > >
> >       > > > > > > > "What do you mean?" asked his
> > wife. "Well,
> >       > > > > you always told me that
> >       > > > > > > > one
> >       > > > > > > > day I would end up farting my
> > guts out, and
> >       > > > > today it finally
> >       > > > > > > > happened. But by
> >       > > > > > > > the grace of God, some
> Vaseline,
> > and these
> >       > > > > two fingers, I think I
> >       > > > > got
> >       > > > > > > > most of
> >       > > > > > > > them back in."
> >       > > >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting,
> just $8.95/month.
> http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or
> its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential
> and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
> attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer
> (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
> binding
=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034741&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000034741
Request Create Date : 5/14/01 4:52:34 PM
Requested For       : jason.r.williams@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production Central View Only Settlements
Resource Type       : Applications


You're in.  Yes, I was thinking of offering up my office.

Also, what do you think about getting together real soon to start setting up
the model for our finance paper?  We'll have to do the research, but I think
setting the model up will be about 75% of the project.

Best,
Jeff

	Jacqueline Kelly <JKelly@FairIsaac.com>
	10/13/2000 01:09 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Study?

Sounds good to me!  Can we use your office?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 6:46 PM
To: JKelly@fairisaac.com
Cc: brodie@haas.berkeley.edu; Chris_Neale@gap.com;
clee@haas.berkeley.edu; dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu;
davis@haas.berkeley.edu; devroede@haas.berkeley.edu;
dshah@haas.berkeley.edu; esarte@haas.berkeley.edu;
hudacko@haas.berkeley.edu; JKelly@fairisaac.com; kazi@haas.berkeley.edu;
kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu; Kwon@haas.berkeley.edu;
langridg@haas.berkeley.edu; mendelso@haas.berkeley.edu; michael@eeg.com
Subject: Study?

Greetings:

Well, there's a finance midterm coming up and some of us have discussed
getting together the weekend before for a study session.

I just grabbed an old list from last year so apologies if I've included
folks who ain't even in finance, or if I've left some folks off.  Sorry to
those who received in error, and please forward to anyone else who might be
interested.  Anyway, anyone interested?

Hope all is well with all.

Best,
Jeff


Jeff, I highlighted all items that need to be suspended or changed in
yellow.   I'm still working on the purchases.  I do have 2 significant
purchase items that I want to include on the manual bill.

AND, I'm still working on the pipeline demand charges.  I call you with that
number.


No need to apologize! I figured you were busy doing something.  We did not go skiing yesterday, it seems that even though we are in a period of "No Work" something always comes up and needs to be done immediately.  I will be around tonight.  I would of tried you later Monday night but I didn't get back to my house until after nine and last night I was at the Nuggets' game watching the San Antonio Spurs, my hometown team, have their way with the Nuggets.  I'll call you after 8:00 pm MST.  If it works tonight great if not I'll keep trying.  You can fill me in on your job.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: travellingchick@talkmatch.com
[mailto:travellingchick@talkmatch.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 7:48 AM
To: plucci@enron.com
Subject: Re: Match.com - You've Got Mail: Hello

Hey Paul--

OK, first, I'm sorry I missed your call Mon night--I was looking forward to talking to you! Secondly, sorry I didn't follow up your call with an email... It's been sort of a strange week in that I thought it was going to be really slow, but then have been busy not only during the day, but have had work obligations every evening, too--including this evening. While I'm usually happy to go home, I'll be particularly so this week. I just can't believe that Christmas is next week already. Ugh.

Did you make it up skiing yesterday? If so, where'd you go? How was the snow?  While it did snow last weekend, it didn't start until Sat afternoon and we went back to Denver Sat night--in the midst of the snowstorm--so really didn't get to enjoy any of the fresh snow... just the headaches it caused.

I'm glad to hear that at least your boss is optimistic about your future options...I'm less so about my own future, but at least being unemployed now would mean more time on the slopes.

In any case, I have a dinner this evening with my team, but should be home (hotel home) around 10ishEST. If you're around this evening,  maybe we could try to talk then?  I'm dying to hear your theories on Elvis...

:-)

Steph

  plucci01@talkmatch.com wrote:

Hey,

Got your email, I'm sorry your weekend didn't turn out as well as you might have expected, at least that's the message I'm getting. I thought about you this weekend when the weather turned out to be nice, and we had fresh snow on Saturday night. I hope you didn't get hurt skiing.

I think I'm skiing tomorrow. There isn't anything going on around here and probably won't be for awhile. Our boss was here Friday night for our Christmas party. He thought once everything was finalized we would like this new deal. So I hope he's right, it's still way too early to tell.

I'll try and call you this evening. I'm looking forward to the conversation. Remember keep your sarcasm in check, you know how sensitive I am.

Topics Open for discussion;

1.) Solutions for solving world hunger
2.) Is Elvis still alive and if so where is he. (I have a theory or two on this on! e)
3.) NSYNC or the Backstreet Boys, which group is more GAY
4.) Is Britney Spears really Madonna's love child

Paul

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messa! ges. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.

  _____

Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your holiday gifts!

*********************************************************

IMPORTANT TIPS TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS AT Match.com:

If you use the "reply" button to respond to this message, please take the following steps:

1.  DELETE ALL TEXT from the body of your message, including header information which may include your actual email address.

2.  REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURES which may include your personal contact information.

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address (in the From: field), so that it will NOT appear in the "From:" line. However, DO NOT use the "Cc:" or "Bcc:" fields as these addresses CANNOT be stripped away.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by clicking "Contact this person" and composing your message directly from the site.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our Match.com Service Agreement.


Here's Paul's memo with Mona's edits and a couple of my edits.  It's been
shipped off to Paul.  I assume he'll be sending it out tomorrow.  If there's
any more questions, edits, comments, etc., please give Paul a buzz.

Best,
Jeff


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	Jenny's B-day

Date:		2/24/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 9:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Mark,

I do not understand this.  Please explain.
-------------------------

Elliot Fullwood,

Enron Europe Finance and Trading Ltd.           Tel: +44 (0)20 7783 0000
40 Grosvenor Place                                                 Direct:
+44 (0)20 7783 6906
LONDON
Fax: +44 (0)20 7783 9018
SW1X 7EN

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Taylor @ ENRON                           22/06/2000 01:39

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore
cc:

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


Bryce,

I'll get it done today.

DG    3-9573

	From:  Bryce Baxter                           06/12/2000 07:15 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Feedback for Audrey Cook

You were identified as a reviewer for Audrey Cook.  If possible, could you
complete her feedback by end of business Wednesday?  It will really help me
in the PRC process to have your input.  Thanks.


Your message

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Edmiston, John on Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:03:00 -0400
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Dallas:DALMXSMB01

 - C.DTF


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Mendez, Nicole
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:41 PM
To:	Davis, Angelic; Becton, Pam; Davis, Dana; Dawson, Brian K.; Hardy, Stacy; Kang, Lisa; Lamb, Marnie; Lum, Rosalyn; Medrano, Veronica; Perez, Christina; Quirsfeld, Amy; Schwertner, Brian; Voinis, Kristi
Subject:	REMINDER: Tammy's Birthday Breakfast Tomorrow!
Importance:	High

Here's what's on the menu so far:

Rosalyn		Kolaches
Lisa 		Fruit Kolaches
Angelic		Donuts
Brian D		Soft Drinks
Pam
Amy
Veronica
Nicole		Brownies
Dana 		Cheese Ball

Nicole

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mendez, Nicole
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:48 AM
To:	Angelic Davis; Becton, Pam; Davis, Dana; Dawson, Brian K.; Hardy, Stacy; Kang, Lisa; Lamb, Marnie; Lum, Rosalyn; Medrano, Veronica; Perez, Christina; Quirsfeld, Amy; Schwertner, Brian; Voinis, Kristi
Subject:	It's Birthday Breakfast Time!

Since Tammy is going to be out on her Birthday (10/22), we will need to celebrate her Birthday tomorrow!  If you would like to bring in something, please let me know.  Thanks.

Nicole Mendez
Sr. Administrative Assistant
EWS - Financial Operations
EB 2375D
Phone: 713-853-1431
Fax: 713-646-5997


We were put back on the T1 lines due to some problems that were occuring
early this morning.  The Networking team is looking into why we are having
these issues.  I will keep you all updated.  If you have any questions or
concerns please feel free to contact me.

Thanks,
Diana


I would like to thank all of you for putting quality time and effort into
this important process.  There is nothing more important to ENA than
attracting and retaining the most talanted and innovative people.

Effectively immediately, written and oral feedback for commercial managers
and directors can be delivered. As per our discussion, the PRC process is
primarily a feedback, performance management and staff planning tool.  It
provides a data point for bonus purposes; however, it is not the only
determinant.  In the interest of ensuring the most effective performance
management tool, I would suggest that we implement the following:
 a)For employees ranked in the strong and above categories, the ultimate
ranking should not be communicated and the message should focus on progress
towards identified commercial goals and objectives and progress towards the
further development of desirable leadership and commerical capabilities.
Written and oral feedback should be delivered immediately;
 b) For employees ranked in the satisfactory, needs improvement and issues
category, the ultimate ranking should be communicated to ensure approriate
documentation of performance and to stimulate a plan to rectify or cure
performance issues.  For the satisfactory category, the message should focus
on increasing deal-flow, financial performance and productivity.  The bar is
always being raised.  For the needs improvement category, the message should
focus on turning around poor performance over the next six months.  For the
issues category, the business unit manager should determine, in conjunction
with your HR rep., the appropriate plan to find a better "fit" in the
organization or counsel out.  Regardless, the ENA Office of the Chairman will
require a written plan of action for all employees in the needs improvement
and issues category from the business unit manager documenting the plan of
action to rectify performance.

Vice President ranking can not be communicated until after the Enron VP PRC
currently scheduled for July 31st.  I anticipate a similar process as above
with our officer feedback process.  Associate and Analyst rankings can not be
communicated until after the Enron A&A PRC currently scheduled for July 19th.

Other identified action items from the meetings include:
 a) the HR group will put together a "profile and performance book" for ENA's
A&A's to ensure our representatives can augment performance information at
the July 19th meeting;
 b) ENA will be aggressively attempting to retain highest performing A&A's to
continue rotating within ENA;
 c) ENA will be holding an additional "off-cycle" A&A super-saturday for
Houston and Portland in August to augment our capabilities in this area;
 and d) your HR representative is building a pipeline of outside employment
candidates for your review each week.  Please review these resumes in a
timely basis and let them know your interest or lack thereof.

Please communicate to your organization as appropriate.

Regards
Mark and Dave


The Wildhorse Operating Team met yesterday (Thursday 08/10) and I was
informed this morning that Wildhorse has decided to present us a formal
proposal to gather Crescendo's Entrada gas from San Arroyo.  Wildhorse told
me to expect the proposal by Friday 08/18; I'll continue to monitor next week
to ensure they do not delay any further.

The nature of the project would be similar to what Wildhorse discussed with
NG Resources in the past...Wildhorse will construct certain pipeline segments
in order to isolate a seperate low Btu gathering line from San Arroyo to
Crescendo's proposed plant location at Badger Wash.

Obviously, when Ken (or myself) receives the proposal, a group meeting would
be very beneficial as I'm sure there will be numerous questions/issues for us
to contemplate.....gathering capacity, structure, contract issues, plant
issues, etc.

Talk to everyone at the Tues. meeting.

Dan


How is it going?  I didn't get here until about 9:20.  Yikes.  I had 6
voicemail messages, when I got here.  Help.


Please note the following changes:
We would like to know the approximate number of attendees for the morning
sessions, so please be sure to let me know which of the two sessions you are
interested in attending.
The afternoon session will begin at 1:00pm, rather than 12:00pm
In order to keep the "flow" of traffic moving through Mt. Hood, please plan
on stopping by at the top of the hour (1pm, 2pm, 3pm, 4pm, 5pm).

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Regards,
Grace
x8321


-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Cooper [mailto:bcfarm@starpower.net]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 7:53 PM
To: Ben Cooper
Subject: PIPELINE NOTES, NO. 21

PIPELINE NOTES FROM WASHINGTON
Vol. 4, No. 21
June 1, 2001

Association of Oil Pipe Lines
(202) 408-7970
(202) 408-7983 (fax)
bcooper@aopl.org

The opinions if any expressed in these notes are the author's only and do
not represent the views of the Association of Oil Pipe Lines (but they
should).

1.	FERC Commissioners confirmed by the Senate Friday May 25

	We missed the news last Friday that the Senate had confirmed the
nominations of Nora Mead Brownell of Pennsylvania and Patrick Henry Wood III
of Texas to be Commissioners of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
They are now official, and the Commission is at full voting strength.
Members need to get in to see these new Commissioners.

2.	President Announces Intent to Nominate DOT General Counsel and RSPA Head

President Bush announced this week that he intends to nominate Kirk Van Tine
to be General Counsel of the Department of Transportation.  Van Tine is
currently a Partner with the law firm of Baker and Botts in Washington,
D.C., where he is in charge of the firm's litigation process.  A former
member of the U.S. Navy, he is a graduate of the Naval Academy and the
University of Virginia Law School.
The President also announced the intention to nominate Ellen G. Engleman to
be Administrator of the Research and Special Programs Administration at the
Department of Transportation.  She currently serves as President and CEO of
Electricore, Inc., a non-profit research and development consortium that
develops advanced transportation and energy technologies through federal
public/private partnerships.  From 1993 to 1994 she was the Director of
Corporate and Government Affairs for Direct Relief International and was a
Public Affairs Executive with GTE from 1987 to 1992.  A resident of
Indianapolis, Indiana, she is a graduate of Indiana University, received a
law degree from Indiana University Law School and a Master's of Public
Administration from Harvard University.

We don't know any more at this moment about these important nominees than is
in the White House press release:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/05/20010531-7.html.

3.	Bush Energy Executive Orders

Here are the links so you can read the first Executive Orders issued to
implement parts of the Bush Energy Plan for yourself:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/05/20010518-6.html and
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/05/20010518-5.html.

4.	OPS to Host Integrity Management Workshops

Put this on your calendars.  API tells us the Office of Pipeline Safety will
be conducting two public workshops to assist operators in developing an
understanding of the integrity management rulemaking, OPS expectations
related to the rulemaking, and OPS resources that are available to
operators.  The workshops are scheduled:

August 7-8, 2001
Doubletree Post Oak Hotel
Houston, TX

October 10-11, 2001
Renaissance Greenway Plaza Hotel
Houston, TX

Logistics and an agenda for these meetings will follow in the next few
weeks.  We do know that Day 1 will focus on the rule itself and the
resources available through the National Pipeline Mapping System.   Day 2
will focus on specific portions of the rule and how operators are
approaching those portions.  OPS characterizes this as a "peer to peer"
exchange and is seeking volunteer company presenters to share ways they are
approaching aspects of the rule.  OPS does not expect a demonstration of
compliance but an exchange of meaningful ways to approach data management,
risk assessment, program development or even subsets of these broad areas.
OPS is seeking operators to make presentations on the Day 2.  If you would
like to take advantage of this opportunity, can contact Beth Callsen at OPS
at (202) 366-4572 or Beth.Callsen@RSPA.dot.gov.

5.	OPS Looking Into Right-of-Way Encroachments

The Office of Pipeline Safety is looking input in a Pipeline Rights-of-Way
Encroachment Research Project.  The response they want will take only a few
minutes of your time.  Submissions must be made no later than June 15.  To
participate in the OPS research effort, complete the questionnaire available
at
http://assn.cycla.com/cycla/trad_SvyHome.trd?&svy=19&pass=encroach&set=oil

6.	New Report on In-Line Inspections

API informs us that the National Association of Corrosion Engineers has
published a new technical committee report, "In-Line Nondestructive
Inspection of Pipelines."   The report analyzes currently available and
emerging technologies for in-line inspection tools and reviews their status
with respect to characteristics, performance, range of application, and
limitations.  It is intended as a reference tool.  The report is currently
only available in paper form by contacting NACE at (281) 228-6223 or by fax
at (281)228-639.  The item number is 24211. The price is $22 (list) or $17
(NACE members).  The document will become available in the near future
electronically from the NACE website at www.nace.org, but it is not there
now.

7.	More on ExSTARS

According to an IRS reminder notice received this week, all product terminal
operators must file their initial excise tax reports under the ExSTARS
program by May 31, 2001 covering the month of April 2001.  So if you haven't
done it yet, you're late.  Terminal operators are required to report all
bulk and non-bulk receipts of liquid products into terminals and all
disbursements by position holders using Form 720-TO and monthly inventory
reconciliation by product code using Form 720-CS.  If this is all Greek to
you and you think you are affected, check out the IRS website at
http://www.irs.gov/bus_info/excise/index.html.

8.	Texas Legislature Wraps Up

The Texas legislature finished up business this week.  Few bills passed
affecting pipelines.  However, one bill that did make it out of the
legislature requires pipeline companies to notify the public when they
change the fuels they transport and to share emergency evacuation plans with
school boards.
http://www.austin360.com/statesman/editions/thursday/news_2.html -- Not much
was left on their to-do list.

9.	Olympic Continues to Make Progress

http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com:80/cgi-bin/texis/web/vortex/displa
y?slug=pipeline31m0&date=20010531 -- Pipeline to Sea-Tac reopens.
http://seattlep-i.nwsource.com/local/25584_tl301.shtml -- Olympic Pipe Line
will flow again soon.  Check out Olympic's press release and fact sheet at
"Current Press Releases" at
http://www.olypipeline.com/pressroom/presslistpp.cfm.

10.	WA State - BP-Fuel Safe Washington v. Williams

http://news.bellinghamherald.com/stories/20010530/FrontPage/54766.shtml --
BP concerned about crossing project: Georgia Strait project would run
through wetlands, near heron habitat.

11.	Comment on the Bush Energy Plan

	We thought these were interesting:
http://ja.mlive.com/news/index.ssf?/news/stories/20010531j31opinthurkjwsdpjn
ewe.frm -- The Bush energy plan is mostly good policy;
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/18/politics/18ENER.html?pagewanted=1 --
Excessive Regulation Is Blamed for Energy Woes (The Times access is free -
you just have to register).

12.	Members of Congress Who Support Pipelines

Sometimes it happens.
http://www.deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,275007929,00.html -- Action sought
on gas lines:  Bennett, Hansen push for OKs on Utah pipelines.

13.	NTSB Has Problems With Other Modes Too

	Sometimes this happens too.
http://www.al.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/cgi-free/getstory_ssf.cgi?o1830_BC_Sa
fetyRecommendations&&news&newsflash-washington -- NTSB recommendations
sometimes ignored.

14.	Getting Gasoline Prices Right

	And this also sometimes it happens.
http://www.charlotte.com/observer/natwor/docs/gasprices0526.htm -- Several
hands dig in our pocket at the gas pump.

15.	Risk Management Demonstration Program Report on the OPS Website

The date on the report is December 2000, but OPS just recently placed the
report on its website at http://ops.dot.gov/ReportToCongress042501.htm --
Beyond Compliance: a Report to Congress on the Pipeline Risk Management
Demonstration Program.

16.	Not Real-Time Leak Detection

Last week we pointed you to a link to an article on leak detection at:
http://www.business2.com:80/magazine/2001/05/pipe_down.htm -- Pipe Down:
Web-linked monitors could stop pipeline problems before they
explode-literally.
We said in our title that this article describes a technology for
 "real-time" leak detection.  As an alert reader pointed out that this
characterization is not accurate, as the technology described only detects
changes in coating condition. In accomplishing that function, it may be able
to identify the occurrence of outside force damage that results from coating
damage.

17.	Change in Control of the Senate Preserves Staff Jobs for the Time Being

We erred last week in predicting that the switch in party leadership in the
Senate would mean that a large number of former Republican Senate committee
staff would have to look for new work.  The power-sharing arrangement
negotiated in the 50-50 Senate prior to the switch by Sen. Jim Jeffords
(D-VT) provided for continuation of the larger staff budget for the 107th
even if a switch occurs.  So apparently, the staff all get to keep their
jobs.

18.	Index Correction

Pipeline rates may be adjusted upwards by 2.7594% as of July 1, 2001 under
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's new rate index, but the
multiplier is not 1.27594 as we asserted last week.  It is 1.027594, which
is a bit less generous.  Hope you didn't get in trouble on our account.

 - PIPELINE NOTES6.1.01.rtf


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Arteaga, Airam
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM
To:	Bates, Kimberly
Subject:	FW: Enron Benefit

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lamadrid, Victor
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 2:49 PM
To:	Allwein, Robert; Alvarado, Kevin; Arteaga, Airam; Boudreaux, Shanna; Carter, Tamara; Casas, Joe A.; Collins, Joann; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillespie, Steve; Halstead, Lia; Homco, Meredith; Loocke, Kelly; Loving, Scott; Ordway, Chris; Prudenti, Dan; Ramirez, Robert; Sanchez, Christina; Wood, Tracy
Subject:	FW: Enron Benefit

FYI>>>>>
Great!! Now they come out with this benefit, after I already bought my car.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	De Jesus, Frank
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 2:19 PM
To:	Allen, Thresa A.; Anderson, Diane; Aucoin, Evelyn; Baumbach, David; Baxter, Bryce; Bike, Anne; Bryan, Linda S.; Couch, Greg; Evans, Casey; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Greif, Donna; Hall, Bob M; Keiser, Kam; Kinsey, Lisa; Lamadrid, Victor; Love, Phillip M.; Mcclure, Mark; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Miroballi, Angelo; Murphy, Melissa Ann; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Ratnala, Melissa K.; Reeves, Leslie; Severson, Russ; Smith, George F.; Stevens, Martha; Sullivan, Patti; Superty, Robert; Theriot, Kim S.; Valdes, John; Vinson, Donald Wayne; White, Stacey W.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Wynne, Rita
Cc:	McLoughlin, Hector
Subject:	Enron Benefit

I want to pass on some work information for you to share with the members of your team please.

Enron has partnered with Ford to provide special discounts to Enron employees on top of the rebates and discounts that normally apply.    The plan is called the Ford X Plan.

Here's how it works:

To get this discount you need this partner Code XB981 or either call 877-975-2600 or go to https://www.fordpartner.com/index.asp and enter the required information.

Name
Address
Company
SSN
Etc.

Upon providing this information you will be given or sent a PIN number.  Then you can go to any Ford dealership, tell them your an XPlan member, give them the PIN and tell them what car you want - no negotiating no haggling.  Any rebates and discounted interest rates still apply to this price.

Regards
Frank


I will be attending a training class today from 1:00 to 4:00 which will
enable me to process your reimbursements.


Jeff

Candidly, this wouldn't have been my approach  (posh location, closed format, odd group, seemingly self-serving agenda).

I read the article below  as unsympatheticand almost  mocking in its tonetoward Enron.  It's  noteworthy theBeverly Hills meeting was not covered in the Los Angeles  papers.  Instead, this article comes fromthe front page of the Bay Area's San Francisco Chronicle (Democratic bastion and  home to both of California's United States Senators, power broker Willie Brown,  Attorney General Bill Lockyer and the state's public utility commission).

Consistent with myconcern about a "coast-to-coast  firestorm"engulfing Enron, the New York  Times ran two articles today that were  unsupportiveof the  company.

q        Senator Calls  for Hearings Into Energy Regulators' Moves
By CHRISTOPHER MARQUIS
Senator  Dianne Feinstein called for hearings into possible improprieties between members  of the F.E.R.C. and private energy interests.

q        Enron's  Dispute With Utility in India Grows More Tangled
By SARITHA RAI
The  dispute between the Enron Corporation and Indian federal and state government  officials keeps getting messier.

These follow the Times'  tough piece on Ken Lay yesterday.   Undoubtedly, the Washington Post will have to get into fray  soon.

My feeling is that just as  with the "business" side, Enron's public policy strategy needs be well informed,  sophisticated and comprehensive.  I  fear that anything less will fuel the potential of undesirable outcomes for  Enron's reputation, leadership and shareholdervalue.

Kevin
213-926-2626

PS - May I have a copy  of the position paper that was circulated in the Beverly Hills  meeting.

The Gate         www.sfgate.com          Return  to regular view
Enron's secret bid to save deregulation
PRIVATE  MEETING: Chairman pitches his plan to prominent Californians  Christian Berthelsen, Scott Winokur,  Chronicle Staff Writers
Saturday, May 26, 2001  ?2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2001/05/26/MN209410.DTL
Energy executive Kenneth Lay, head of powerful Enron Corp., quietly courted  Arnold Schwarzenegger, Richard Riordan, Michael Milken and other luminaries  this week in Beverly Hills to drum up support for his solution to California's  energy crisis.
His prescription called for more rate increases, an end to state and  federal investigations and less rather than more regulation.
Lay, a close friend of President Bush and one of his largest campaign  contributors, hosted a private 90-minute meeting in a conference room at the  Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills on Thursday.
Among the participants were Milken, the former head of the Drexel Burnham  Lambert investment banking firm who pleaded guilty to fraud charges in 1990  and who now runs a think tank based in Santa Monica; movie star  Schwarzenegger;
and Riordan, the mayor of Los Angeles. Schwarzenegger and Riordan have been  courted recently as GOP gubernatorial candidates.
One participant, who agreed to speak on the condition he not be identified,  said the meeting appeared to be geared toward getting participants to support  Lay's vision and then champion it to officials who are trying to solve the  state's energy mess.
PLAN TO RESCUE DEREGULATION
The source said the timing and tone of the meeting suggested Lay is  concerned that California will abandon its disastrous experiment with power  markets by either re-regulating the system or creating a government authority  to provide electricity. Gov. Gray Davis signed legislation last week to create  and fund a state power authority that would build, buy and run power plants in  California.
"They're trying to rescue deregulation," the source said of Enron  executives. "They think the whole state power authority is a bad idea."
At the meeting, Enron representatives circulated a four-page position paper  titled "Comprehensive Solution for California," which was obtained by The  Chronicle. It said ratepayers should bear responsibility for the billions in  debt incurred by the state's public utilities and that investigations of power  price manipulation and political rhetoric are making matters worse.
The paper made no mention of the possibility that much of the runaway  electricity costs in California is due to market manipulation by power  generators and traders -- a possibility given credibility in studies by  regulators and economists.
One of the talking points read: "Get deregulation right this time --  California needs a real electricity market, not government takeovers." Another  point suggested giving consumers monetary rebates for conserving electricity.
INVOLVED IN EARLY DAYS
Lay has been an aggressive champion of deregulated electricity markets and  was an early advocate in persuading California to begin its experiment with a  competitive power market system.
Lay has created a new kind of company in the process, one that essentially  produces nothing but makes money as a middle-man, buying electricity from  generators and selling it to consumers. During the first quarter of this year,  Enron's revenues increased 281 percent to $50.1 billion.
Asked about the purpose of the meeting, Karen Denne, a spokeswoman for  Enron, said she would "look into that" and then did not return repeated  telephone calls seeking comment. One participant said Denne was present at the  meeting.
D.C. CONNECTIONS
Meanwhile, Lay's power in Washington is reported to have reached  unprecedented heights. According to a story in yesterday's New York Times, Lay  supplied the Bush administration with a list of candidates for jobs regulating  the power industry and even interviewed one of them. The story also said Lay  essentially threatened to seek the removal of the chairman of the Federal  Energy Regulatory Commission, Curt Hebert, if he does not support Lay's desire  to further deregulate the nation's electricity system. Lay denied the  allegation.
Also in attendance at this week's meeting were Bruce Karatz, chief  executive of home builder Kaufman & Broad; Ray Irani, chief executive of  Occidental Petroleum; and Kevin Sharer, chief executive of biotech giant  Amgen.
Among those who were invited but did not attend were former Los Angeles  Lakers star Earvin "Magic" Johnson; supermarket magnate and Bill Clinton  supporter Ron Burkle; and Dennis Tito, recently returned from the world's  first civilian space trip.
Milken, through a spokesman, confirmed that he attended the meeting, but  declined to be interviewed. Schwarzenegger could not be reached for comment  through a publicist, and Sharer did not return a call yesterday afternoon.
A spokesman for Riordan, Peter Hidalgo, said the Los Angeles mayor  attended,
but was "not intending to formulate any kind of policy position on this  issue.
His intent is to listen to all sides."
Attached to the Enron handout was a two-page open letter, addressed to  Davis and the state Legislature, apparently prepared for those who support  Lay's position and would be willing to sign their names to it. The source who  participated in the meeting said those assembled appeared noncommittal and  asked a number of questions of Lay, but did not agree to champion his agenda.
E-mail the writers at cberthelsen@sfchronicle.com  and  Scott Winokur at swinokur@sfchronicle.com .  ?2001  San Francisco Chronicle    Page A - 1


Start Date: 12/26/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Start Date: 1/21/02; HourAhead hour: 17;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012117.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Thursday, November 15, 2001    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   Friends & Family Sale  Fare Sale  Continental makes it easy to get together with friends &family. Whether you're planning a quick visit or a holiday reunion, continental.com saves you time and money. We're offering 10% off select sale fares in North America &Europe when you book online through December 4, 2001.   Visit continental.com  to purchase your eTickets today.   ShopOnePass. Shop 'Til You Fly.   ShopOnePass Click your way to reward travel with ShopOnePass, your new online spot to earn up to 15 OnePass miles per dollar from leading merchants. Just in time for the holidays!    Purchases from leading online retailers get you closer to reward travel at www.continental.com/onepass/shop .     Watch ShopOnePass for additional merchants.    Travel Updates  Be sure to check continental.com  before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!    If you need assistance please visit: www.continental.com/service . View our Privacy Policy .  This message was sent to: jeff.shankman@enron.com - OnePass Number: PB185192     [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]

[IMAGE]


Start Date: 2/3/02; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020309.txt


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/10/2000 04:22 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	10/09/2000 02:39 PM

		 To: "Ugoretz Kaufman" <manretz@email.msn.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Here you go.  Who's Ugoretz?

Happy Yom.

Best,
Jeff


Start Date: 1/11/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Good Morning.

Per Tana Jones's request,  I will fax  a copy of the executed ISDA Master
Agreement dated March 31, 2000 between Enron North America Corp. and Kellogg
Company.  For your convenience, attached is an electronic version of the
Schedule to the Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)  and Paragraph
13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex dated as of March 31, 2000
(658ectr.doc).

Taffy Milligan
X57373

----- Forwarded by Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2000 07:08 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	05/09/2000 08:29 AM

		 To: Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Kellogg's

Can you take care of sending him the executed documents!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000 08:28 AM -----

	Deepak Sitlani
	05/09/2000 06:46 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Michael Khajeh-Noori/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Kellogg's

Tana

I do not seem to have received the documentation referred to in my e-mail
below.  I should be grateful if you would e-mail the execution versions both
to me and Michael Khajeh-Noori so that we can mirror the documentation for
the purposes of negotiating a new ISDA with Kellogg's UK entity.
Alternatively, if it is not possible to e-mail them, please fax them to me (+
44 20 7783 8171).

If you  have any questions, please let me know.

In the meantime, many thanks for your help.

Regards

Deepak
---------------------- Forwarded by Deepak Sitlani/LON/ECT on 09/05/2000
12:42 ---------------------------

Deepak Sitlani
03/05/2000 14:44
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael Khajeh-Noori/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Kellogg's

I am looking for the ISDA Schedule, Paragraph 11 to the Credit Support Annex
and the Enron and Kellog guarantees.  If at all possible, it would be ideal
if you could e-mail me the execution versions of these docs.  Alternatively,
please fax them (my fax no. is +44 20 7783 4539).

Many thanks for your help.

Regards

Deepak

From: Tana Jones on 03/05/2000 08:41 CDT
To: Deepak Sitlani/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Kellogg's

The Kellogg ISDA Agreement has been signed, but it is somewhat long.  Would
you like me to fax it to you (if so, what is your fax no.?) or would you like
me to fedex it to you?


Attached are the discussion notes for the 1:30 PM meeting today (EB-1336) with Dan McCarty and Rod Hayslett.  The "TO: list" will be in attendance, the "CC: list" are unavailable for this meeting.

JNG


aye aye

	Paul Kaufman@ECT
	10/10/2000 11:42 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Information re: Commissioner McIntyre

I had asked whether any of the folks attending the meeting in Portland would
be available to sit with Tim Belden et al, when McIntire was in our offices.


Gerald - Per Steve's request, it is not Burlington but Mariner that is the
interested party.  His name is Greg Harless and his e-mail is
gharless@mariner-energy.com.  Ted  P.S. The lawyer at Burlington is Jim
Vianna.

To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted C
Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Platform Lease -Reply -Reply

Attached is Marathon's response to our email.  I will call Brad to set up a
telephone conference.

Ted,  Steve asked that I forward this information to a lawyer at Burlington,
but couldn't recall the name.  Do you have any contact information for
Burlington.  Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000 09:38 AM -----

	"Bradley G Penn" <bgpenn@marathonoil.com>
	06/01/2000 09:17 AM

		 To: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
		 cc: ERGetz@GROUPWISE.MarathonOil.com, RAHernandez@GROUPWISE.MarathonOil.com
		 Subject: Re: Platform Lease -Reply -Reply

Gerald, It seems that the drafts that have been sent back to Marathon have
confused the relationships of Marathon, Mariner and MEGS. As an example you
have requested that the LOPSA rely on the O&M Agreement between Mariner and
MEGS, which Marathon is not a party.  We would rather that agreement remain
between MEGS and Mariner and be the basis for your resolution of disputes.
The legal capacities presented in your response to the LOPSA draft are
confusing. All rights seem to flow to MEGS, yet the obligations seem to be on
Mariner, we do not believe the division of rights and obligations in this
manner are a good situation. By example the Indemnity provisions have been
altered to have Mariner indemnify the Owners and Operator (no mention of
MEGS)and then further change the indemnity to a negligence based indemnity
(of Platform Operator). The PHA is a unilateral indemnity to Platform
Operator and Platform Owners and we must insist on this same level of
protection with MEGS.
If you would like to make another attempt at either a ratification or LOPSA
that addresses MEGS as Lessee and Mariner as its operator and provide for any
resolution between those two in the O&M Agreement we would be happy to
discuss this further. If you would like to go through the LOPSA line by line
please call and we can set up a teleconference with our legal department to
do so.
BGP

>>> <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com> 05/31/00 01:04pm >>>

I have reviewed your response and disagree with the characterization of our
modification the documents. I would like to clarify our reasons for the
modifications to avoid any further miscommunications.

MEGS' alteration of the documents do not impair the protections afforded to
Marathon under the Production Handling Agreement.  Our modifications were
simply intended to allocate certain risks between MEGS and Mariner with
respect to Marathon (as operator of the South Pass 89 B Platform) as such
risks were intended to be allocated by MEGS and Mariner.  Mariner's
transfer of interest in the flowline to MEGS introduces a new party which
Marathon can look to for certain obligations with respect to the platform.
The alterations do not remove Mariner from its current role as operator and
maintainer of the flowline and owner of the hydrocarbons.  For these
reasons, I would disagree with your response that the draft alterations do
not provide the intended protections that Marathon would expect absent such
a transfer to MEGS.  Mariner still shoulders these risks and expenses under
the Production Handling Agreement.

Having MEGS fully ratify the Production Handling Agreement  and becoming
jointly and severally liable to Marathon is not appropriate.   MEGS does
not hold title to any hydrocarbon production or operate the facilities and
should not be liable for all risks and expenses associated therewith.
Mariner should continue to shoulder those risks and as before.

I would be happy to discuss your issues with our Platform Lease revisions
at your convenience or to discuss the above further.

                    "Bradley G
                    Penn"                 To:     Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
                    <bgpenn@marath        cc:
ERGetz@GROUPWISE.MarathonOil.com,
                    onoil.com>            JCAlbert@GROUPWISE.MarathonOil.com
                                          Subject:     Platform Lease -Reply
                    05/26/2000
                    10:00 AM

Attached are our response and ratification agreement.
BGP

>>> "Gerald Nemec" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com> 05/25/00 04:49pm >>>

Brad,  Can you give me a status on where you are at with the review of the
Lease
Docs for the MEGS Facilities? I forward those documents about a month back.

Gerald Nemec
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
(See attached file: MEGS.DOC)
(See attached file: MEGSRAT.DOC)