NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: PHIL HOCHMUTH
on LINUX
06/04/01 - Today's focus: Boost for enterprise Linux

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* Major vendors beef up enterprise Linux support
* Links related to Linux
* Featured reader resource

_______________________________________________________________
This newsletter sponsored by Thawte

FREE Apache SSL Guide from Thawte Certification
Do your online customers demand the best available protection
of their personal information? Thawte's guide explains how to
give this to your customers by implementing SSL on your Apache
Web Server. Click here to get our FREE Thawte Apache Guide.
http://nww1.com/go/2928331a.html
_______________________________________________________________
NEWS ALERTS NOW AVAILABLE FROM NETWORK WORLD!
You have very specific information needs about a technology or
technology vendor and you  subscribe to a newsletter or go on-
line to find out about the strategic developments in this
specific area. But how do you stay up with the late-breaking
news? Network World now offers six very focused News Alerts to
keep you abreast of the most significant developments of the
week on LANs, Storage, Network/Systems Management, The Edge,
Cisco and Microsoft. As an added service, if there's impactful,
late-breaking news about one of these specific technologies or
vendors, by subscribing to our News Alerts, we'll let you know
what it is within hours. Subscribe today at
http://nww1.com/go/ad082.html
_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Boost for enterprise Linux

By Phil Hochmuth

While the high-tech economy may still be depressed, several
large IT vendors are continuing to invest in the development
and fine-tuning of Linux for large-scale enterprise
deployments. This is good news for users.

Last month, IBM made some noise with two announcements in the
Linux development area. Big Blue, along with NEC, Hitachi and
Fujitsu, announced a new joint Linux development effort aimed
at improving the management of Linux servers by developing
tools to better diagnose operating system faults. The four
mainframe and server makers also will add support for Non-
Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) support in the Linux code, which
could lead to highly-scalable, mainframe-like Linux servers.

In a separate announcement, IBM launched its Linux Community
Development System. The program will make IBM mainframes
running virtual Linux server images available to open source
developers for code testing. Developers will be able to access
either a TurboLinux or SuSE distribution image running on an
IBM zSeries mainframe for 30, 60 or 90 days. The program's aim
is to give developers a high-powered hardware platform for
developers to create enterprise-level applications for Linux.

Also in the area of Linux application development, the Open
Source Development Lab plans to expand by opening a second site
in Tokyo, Japan. The Open Source Development Lab was started in
Portland, Ore., in December to provide Linux developers with
enterprise hardware as an application development platform.

Observers have said that since Linux was created on low-end PC
hardware, the operating system has not been scaled up to its
full potential. This is because most Linux application
developers, without access to their own personal mainframes,
use lower-powered PCs for writing and testing their code. With
large companies throwing their weight behind enterprise Linux
development, users might expect to see some interesting new
software products in the near future.

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Phil Hochmuth:

Phil Hochmuth is a staff writer for Network World, and
a former systems integrator. You can reach him at
mailto:phochmut@nww.com.
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED EDITORIAL LINKS

Check out IBM's Linux mainframe development program
http://www.ibm.com/linux

Read more about the OSDL
http://www.osdlab.org/

IBM, NEC, Hitachi and Fujitsu team on Linux
IDG News Service, 05/30/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0530ibmnhf.html

Breaking Linux news from Network World and around the 'Net,
updated daily: http://www.nwfusion.com/topics/linux.html

Archive of the Linux newsletter:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/linux/index.html
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

User Excellence Award

If you've completed an interesting network project in the last
12 to 18 months, here's your chance to gain industry
recognition for it. Network World is currently accepting
nominations for its annual User Excellence Award. For more
information and an online nomination form, go to
http://www.nwfusion.com/nw/awards.html#excellence
Deadline for submission is June 11.
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES on 06/25/2001 01:25 PM ---------------------------

Michael Frazier
06/25/2001 09:48 AM
To:	Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Load Desk Business Plan

The "long form" is attached, as requested.  Thanks for your suggestions.


Here is the VOM and Heat Rate for the Little Rock, Ark. site located in
Entergy (Entergy Hub).  The site is on Entergy's 500 kV line and on NGPL's
pipelines.  VOM and H.R's are the following:

VOM = $1.00 w/o major maintenance
There are four levels of running the configuration:
Full Output with Duck Firing: 542 MW's/ 8,842 Heat Rate
Full Output wothout Duck Firing: 422 MW's/7,907 Heat Rate
One GE 7EA: 105 MW's/8,251 Heat Rate
Warm running GE 7EA: 59 MW's/ 9,831 Heat Rate

Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks!
Ben
3-7998


please print,  also let her know i still want reports.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
04:30 PM ---------------------------

Sheetal Patel
10/10/2000 02:11 PM
To: Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross
Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Dyk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Agustin
Perez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT, Bill Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lucy
Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Black/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew
Wilson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry
Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Schorr/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom
Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vikas Dwivedi/NA/Enron@Enron, Sabina
Rank/NA/Enron@Enron, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrea Hauser/NA/Enron@Enron,
Beth Cowan/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Kyle/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Week 13 EOL Update

Hello Everyone,

This is the LAST EOL UPDATE I will be sending.  If you would like a weekly
status, please let me know.

Thanks,

Sheetal
x36740


Don't forget the watch party at the SRO,  Northwest Mall, at 11:30 a.m. this Saturday.  The Cats need our help!   We can't let those big Aggies overcome us!

There will be no watch party next week for the  Kansas game.  The game will be shown only in Kansas by pay tv.  Go to Kansas and  you can see it!

GO CATS!

Joyce Nesmith

All activities of the Houston Alumni Club are  sponsored by the
Kansas State University Alumni  Association

 If you wish to unsubscribe from this  mailing list,
Please write me at j.nesmith@prodigy.net


Ok Mr Holden I am proving Deal Change for 703168 - a value of 25,450.14

You will see this in the DPR under Change in Price.

-Heather


hpuente@epelectric.com

915-543-4333


----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 03:14 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	12/13/2000 02:57 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Tom Ross" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>,
"Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Stephanie-Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Rob Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Pigott
Jack" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Paula Hall-Collins"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "Norton Kelli"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "McNally Ray" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>,
"Marty Wilson" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"Kristin Vellandi" <kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "kent Palmerton"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Karen
Edson" <kedson@ns.net>, "John Stout" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jean
Munoz" <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Bob Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>,
"Baker Carolyn" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "B Brown Andy"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "Andy Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "Douglas Kerner"
<DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "Dave Modisette" <dmodis@ns.net>
		 cc: "Cary Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Hedy Govenar"
<hgovenar@acom2.com>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Bev Hansen"
<bhansen@lhom.com>
		 Subject: Follow-up to Governor's Press Conference

The following is the list of suppliers referenced by Governor Davis in today
's Washington, DC press conference.  For those of you that are IEP members,
it would be helpful if you forwarded to IEP any comments you have made or
plan on making to the press.

These suppliers have advised the ISO that they are unwilling to sell power
into the California markets.

Dynegy Power Marketing
Trans Alta
Eugene Water and Electric
Southern Energy Trading
PowerEx (BC Hydro)
Public Service Colorado
Enron Power Marketing
Portland General
Avista (Washington Water Power)
Idaho Power Company
PPL Montana
Seattle City Light
Puget Sound Energy

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Edson + Modisette
jmball@ns.net


Would you get me all the contract details on this capacity and email it to me?

thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 12:13
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           11/21/2000 01:27 PM

To: Angel Fuller/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry
Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Virginia Natural Gas...Columbia Gas

Angel,

Steve Gillespie is managing the day to day operations of the VNG asset mgt.
deal for our logistics group.  Please include him with your queries.  It is
my understanding that we are agents for all of their contracts and we pay all
their transport costs.  In turn, we invoice them and they re-imburse us for
that transport.

Chris Germany and Scott Goodell in the Transportation Trading Group  are
responsible for setting these contracts in UNIFY.  All of these contracts in
question are storage or transportation tied to storage. Chris/Scott please
set up the 5 valid contracts below in UNIFY as soon as possible....Contract
37634 is terminated effective 8/31/1999.

If you have any questions please let us know.
Victor

Angel Fuller@ENRON
11/21/2000 09:47 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H
Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Virginia Natural Gas...Columbia Gas

Hi Joann and Alvin,

As you know, effective October 1, ENA became agent for Virginia Natural Gas.
Here in Volume Management, as I try to load beginning balances and actualize
volumes (so that I can pay VNG's transportation charges) for 10/2000, it
appears that the following contracts for VNG/Cgas are not in Unify.

Contract Number  Type
38079    FSS...Master Contract
35889    x-133 LNG Storage
60536    SST
37634    ISS
53004    FSS
60537    FSS

I would appreciate any help you can give me in getting these contracts in
Unify as soon as possible.  If you have any questions or need additional
information, please let me know.

Thanks,
Angel


Just a note...

I have not gotten that ISDA Master out yet because there are some things in the credit worksheet that don't jive with the credit terms in the current master as well as credit terms generally consistent on this side of the Atlantic.  I have asked Jay Williams in our Credit Dept. here to get with the credit person there in London who worked up the credit worksheet to clear up the credit terms.  I have drafted the ISDA with everything except making the credit choices so it sits there waiting for credit.

Just wanted to keep you updated...


Good to see you guys on saturday morning. forgot to hit you up for money.
those in attendance tomorrow night, please bring your 150 check. Pig, thanks
for the scotch and lures. have a good week in dallas. e.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


When we meet today, I would like to discuss these issues.


Steve,
I know that we specifically included the stabilizer in the Salmon deal.
Please confirm that it belongs there so that we can finish up the break out
contract.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/09/2001 06:48
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/09/2001 05:55:57 PM
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc: kay.mann@enron.com

Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement

Kent/Kay-

I've redline the Salmon contract for Exhibits A and B, Purchase Amount,
Maximum Liability Amount, and Unit Liability Amount.  The Power System
Stabilizer has been struck from scope, because I can recall Bill Williams
advising that LV would need them, Delta/Salmon would not.  That's consitent
with the other units going to CA (w/ Intergen).

Regards,

Lee <<Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC>>

 - Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC


Thanks.  Sounds alot better than #17.

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Bortman
Sent: Fri 8/31/2001 7:02 PM
To: dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu
Cc:
Subject: E278

Hi Jeff,

You are #4 on the waitlist for E278, Deals. If you have any questions
please give us a call at 510-642-1406.

Josh Bortman
Evening MBA Program


Colleagues:

EES positions as of end of April 2001 are now available at the following
level of details:

The position (long, short, and net) in electric utility "x"
The position (long, short, and net) per customer in the electric utility "x".
The position (long, short, and net) per rate schedule/customer class in
electric utility "x".
Aggregates of the above per State, NERC Region, and Customer.

If you need any position for a specific utility in your service territory,
please contact Miyung Buster ((713-853-4329) by email with cc to: Stella
Chan, and/or Amr Ibrahim and we shall attempt to provide the data in the
shortest possible time (currently aiming at within the same business day).
Additional names for contact will be added very soon, hopefully, to shorten
the reply time and increase data reliability.

Best regards

AI
713-853-3037


Dear Licensee,

We have just completed and uploaded new versions of the GPCM User
Interface, the PowerPoint "Automaps" and the GDS Graphical Display
System.

Version 9.0.8.4 of the User Interface has changes that work in
conjunction with the new GDS.  In addition, a few bugs were found and
cleaned up.

The automaps are totally updated to match RDI / Platt's recent Jan02base
release.

The new GDS has two major new features:

1.	You can now select all pipelines by state
2.	You can now display results by month, by year, and by average of
several years

Our next release is planned to have two new features as well:

1.	Display results for any season (summer, winter)
2.	Display receipt and delivery clearing prices for each pipeline
zone (month, year, average of several years, season)

We have one design issue which we would like your input on:

When displaying by season, we can define the winter as a continguous
5-month period, Nov-2001 through Mar-2002, for example, or we can define
winter for a year as Jan through Mar and Nov through Dec of the same
calendar year.

Our question is do you have a preference for one of these approaches?

Please let me know right away.

You can download the new user interface and GDS in the usual manner
through the GPCM or RBAC websites.

Bob Brooks

GPCM Natural Gas Market Forecasting System

http://gpcm.rbac.com <http://gpcm.rbac.com/>


Hi again.

I understand from Randy (Jason) that the CAD $5MM is scheduled to come
tomorrow, not today as previously informed.

Enron Canada Corp has been halted from BUYing and will remain halted until
such time NGX has received additional Collateral (at least another CAD$8.5MM
plus more if Enron Canada Corp wishes to continue to purchase).

Thanks.
Kenny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kenny Foo [mailto:Kenny.Foo@ngx.com]
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:00 PM
To:	'Jason Williams (E-mail)'; 'Randy Otto (E-mail)'; 'Mike Cowan (E-mail)'
Cc:	'Louise Kitchen (E-mail)'; Gary Gault; Ron Manitowich
Subject:	RE: Enron position.
Importance:	High

Hello all.

We just received notification that our Bank has received the CAD$3MM out of
CAD$8MM originally expected.

Thanks
Kenny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kenny Foo [mailto:Kenny.Foo@ngx.com]
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:44 PM
To:	'Jason Williams (E-mail)'; 'Randy Otto (E-mail)'; 'Mike Cowan (E-mail)'
Cc:	'Louise Kitchen (E-mail)'; Gary Gault; Ron Manitowich
Subject:	Enron position.
Importance:	High

It has been our understanding (credit area, both companies) that Enron must
prepay for all its purchases including all forward positions ever since
Enron was downgraded to BBB minus.  Unfortunately for Enron Canada Corp., I
cannot convince my Board nor my Bank to do otherwise.

Enron will still get interest from pre-payments that have not been used to
pay for gas that has already been delivered and invoiced.

With the above in mind, here is the current status:
					CAD$
$ carried forward from yesterday 	   2,725,000
Today's purchases			(14,225,000)	large part of which is Dec gas
Today's wire				   8,000,000 	which incidentally has not arrived as yet
Balance	(short)			  (3,500,000)

Jason, kindly
*	please followup with your Treasury area to see where CAD$8mm is?
*	please, for today's value date, arrange to send another CAD$3.5mm plus
whatever $$ your traders need for tomorrow?
*	your Calgary traders have another 30TJs of room for day gas at time of
writing this email (purchases so far today 3,660TJs).  Once the 30TJs is
filled, you will be halted.

We thank you for your co-operation.

Kenny Foo
Credit and Risk Manager
NGX Financial Inc
140 - 4 Avenue SW, Suite 2330
Calgary,  Alberta, T2P 3N3
Ph: (403)974-1737
Fx: (403)974-1719


We previously had this counterparty open to trade financial because they were
ESP, and now your 1/24/01 list says they are not ESP.  Which is it?


Apparently I forgot to send this e-mail out previously.  Here's the last
summary and a new one will be issued next week as well.


When: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:00 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS 04750

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

This meeting has been rescheduled for today at 2:00.


Bob finally entered these. Here are the deal numbers and details:

471546
Enron buys El Paso
25 MW
141.00
Palo Verde
On Peak

471547
Enron sells EES
25 MW
141.05
Palo Verde
On Peak

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/01/2000 08:47 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: tfs checkout

can you check with bob again, because i got confirms on the deals.  the
broker told me yesterday he forgot to tell bob.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/30/2000 06:05 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: tfs checkout

Bob does not recognize these deals, and tried to check with the broker. He'll
talk to TFS in the morning to verify these and I'll let you know ASAP.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/30/2000 02:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: tfs checkout

missing 2 deals for bob:

buy el paso
cal 01
141.00
25 mw
pv
on peak

sell ees
cal 01
141.05
25 mw
pv
on peak

thanks


The EES domain controller which facilitates the EES VPN solution will be relocated from 3 Allen Center to the Enron Building on Thursday, October 25, 2001 from 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm CST.

EES employees who have not migrated to the Corp Domain will not be able to use their VPN solution during this time period.

If you need additional information, please contact the EES Resolution Center at x39797


Hey there.

I don't think I've been fishing since July.  Geez, it is half way through
September.

I'm in Chicago today (NYC yesterday).  A whirl wind tour.

I hear the Aquarium closed - killed by bike lanes.  Two weeks later the owner
died.  We need to find a "new" dive.

Kay

John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/12/2000 04:34 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Sanity check

Yeh-huh. I sent an e-mail. I will dredge up and resend. Been fishing lately?

To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Sanity check

I'm either losing my mind or my email.  Did you send me an email re GE?  I
thought I saw one, but now I can't find it. Is that a trick, and if so, how
do I do it?

Could you resend it, please?

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
12:17 PM ---------------------------

Rebecca Griffin@ENRON
11/15/2000 12:06 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Valero 10/00

I noticed the new October deals for Valero (414065, 414074, 414071) include
both the base Index pricing and the swing Gas Daily pricing.  However, the
old swing deals (148386, 148391, 148382) are still valid through October.
Should these deals be effective for October?

Thanks for your help.

Rebecca


BRING ME A THREADGILLS T-SHIRT!!!
506 CHITWOOD CRT
HOUSTON TX 77094

SEE YOU ON SATURDAY!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Maria Hernandez" <Maria.Hernandez@lbb.state.tx.us>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Maria+20Hernandez+22+20+3CMaria+2EHernandez+40lbb+2Estate+2Etx+2Eus+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 10:07 AM
To:	Hernandez, Juan
Subject:	address

what is your address..I am trying to find a map..

Crissy
 - TEXT.htm << File: TEXT.htm >>


TOWNSEND, JUDITH G,
?
You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance
Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process,
and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance
Management goals.
?
To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and
select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing
feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed
by Friday, May 25, 2001.
?
If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com
?
Thank you for your participation in this important process.
?
The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL
RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.
?
Employee Name:
FLETCHER, BRENDA
FRANKLIN, CYNTHIA
GARCIA, CLARISSA
HOMCO, MEREDITH
SINGLA, KIMAT
WOOD, TRACY


ditto -- nice work Rob.  Your insights on project stanley are also much
appreciated.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 07/31/2000 08:33
AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
07/31/2000 07:31 AM
To: Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Alberta PPA

Your work on the  Alberta PPA has not gone unnoticed and really is a  model
for the rest of the group as to how to approach the review and analysis of  a
significant transaction w/ huge reg. risk-  the thoroughness and quality of
your work were top notch as was the teamwork you exhibited thoughout the
process..... not to mention the external leadership you provided on the issue
w/ folks like Larry Charach. Thanks very much!


I will be out of the office from 10/12/2000 until 10/17/2000.

I will respond to your message when I return.


Here is the final version of the ad to be posted in the next Texas Lawyer.
Let's see what we get!  Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 03:47 PM -----

	Molly Magee/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/04/2001 02:57 PM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Texas Lawyer

Here's the final version--looks great to me!

Molly

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Candace Klimisch <cklimisch@ho.hodes.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Candace+20Klimisch+20+3Ccklimisch+40ho+2Ehodes+2Ecom+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Magee, Molly
Subject: Texas Lawyer

Molly, Here is the revised ad. I went ahead and reserved space for Monday,
April 9. I need to have it at the publication by 10 am Thursday morning.
Thanks Candace

 <<60079.pdf>>

Candace Klimisch, Associate Account Executive
> Ph. 713-690-0272, 1-800-929-2190 Fax 713-939-0336
> cklimisch@ho.hodes.com
>
Bernard HODES Group
because talent matters

 - 60079.pdf


Thanks, I got it yesterday.

DG

"Sean Quigley" <sean@audionmore.com> on 01/04/2001 10:44:37 AM
To: <dgiron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Order Shipped

Your recent order from Audio N More was shipped from one of our shipping
locations on 12/27/00 and is scheduled for delivery today, 1/4/01.

The UPS tracking number is:  1ZE148140344435868

Unfortunately, we your email address incorrect, therefore you did not
receive the tracking notification when your order shipped.  Please accept
our apologies for this oversight.

Thank you again for your order.
We're open 24 hours/7days on the Web!
Shop direct from our catalog at:
http://www.audionmore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=SFNT&Store_Code=ANM

Secure server at:
https://nereus.safe-order.net/custom-car-sound/order.htm

Payment is quick & easy with on-line Telecheck.
http://audio-n-more.com/customer/online_check_payment.htm

Sales hours posted on site: 1-866-365-4202


Anne and I talked  with Neil Imus (our V&E HSR lawyer) after our meeting this afternoon.  We relayed to him the substance of our discussions.  He reiterated his earlier position that there is "no harm" is requesting a shorter extension in a non-offensive fashion.   He had talked with one of AEP's lawyers earlier and AEP is considering requesting a meeting with Jade to discuss our need for a June 1 closing. We also believe that this would a good approach; however, the three of us concurred that timing is more important than the method of communication and that if a meeting cannot be arranged in the next day or two, we should go ahead and present our request over the phone, with a letter to follow perhaps.  We attempted to reconnect with AEP's lawyers but were unsuccessful.  We will continue to try to press AEP for a decision on how to proceed.

Please call me or Anne if you have any questions.  We will keep you posted.


I feel like such a heel.  There is a hidden pocket in my computer bag and I
had placed my phone and flight info in this pocket.  Thank you for continuing
to look for the phone.  I am embarrassed.

I had a meeting with Beth today.  I feel that it did not go well.  I asked
for an IT person that would work in our group and would be expected to learn
the fundamentals.  I also indicated that I would like everyone in the group
to learn IT and that we would hire someone to sit on our desk and produce the
front-end.  She did not like that idea.  Her proposal is that an IT person
can sit on our desk and decide what IT resources we need and she wants
front-end production to be handled by her group.

We ended the meeting with no resolution and we will meet again tomorrow.  It
seems to me that if we don't have free access to the website or database, the
group will suffer.  I will follow up tomorrow.


Our agreements with EnronOnline customers prohibit us from sharing their names with third parties (i.e. non-Enron companies).  We can use our customer lists ourselves for marketing our products, but can not give the lists to anyone else.

Mark Taylor
Vice President and General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
(713)853-7459


nope.  maybe ask greg or sebastien.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Poon Tip, Colin
Sent:	Thursday, November 22, 2001 8:49 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	log file

Hey coop...........what is this? WS_FTP.LOG
I found it in the XNAX/Security folder, and noticed that it was screwing things up..............did you drop it there?

ciao


I don't need to talk shit about the game.  I will let the Longhorns do the
talking for me on Saturday.

By the way,  you can probably see your reflection in that surfboard by now.

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, val.generes@ac.com
cc:
Subject: CWS

Excerpt from Baseball America on 2000 CWS.

Bass, give it up.  You are done.

The Tigers wear the mantle of favorite well. They have won
                    nine straight games in postseason play, including the
Southeastern
                    Conference tournament. They are relatively healthy. They
have power
                    hitters, they have patient hitters, and they can field
better than recent
                    versions of the club. Best of all, they have a lot of
arms, and they have
                    Bertman around to use them.


For clarification, the "Vestas availability" you talk about is not specific
to Vestas nor is it based on any Vestas contractual availability.   This
availability is a multi- industry standard for simple "series component"
availability.   There is no credit for maintenance or repair time time which
is why a 3-5% loss is considered acceptable for long term performance.   The
3-5% loss includes maintenance.   An availability metric that shows the
turbine as available during repairs would be very objectionable to future
owners.    Pausing the turbine during maintenance may be acceptable if the
long term goal is set accordingly.   For example, if the turbine is always
paused during maintenance then the long term system goal should be close to
the 99.5% goal for grid availability.

Hollis Kimbrough
05/15/2002 07:40 AM
To: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Calculating "Vestas Availability"

Guys,

In an earlier e-mail Ben made the statement:  "Have you been able to
determine what these numbers would look like using Vestas' definition of
availability:  Hours of Wind Turbine in Operation mode X 100 / Hours of Grid
in Operation Mode."

We now need to develop a methodology to calculate the Vestas definition using
VisuPro data.  I think this boils down to:

Vestas Avail = (SOT+WOT+EST+RT+MT)/(ST-LOT)

Where:

SOT = System Okay Time
EST = External Stop Time
WOT = Weather Out Time
LOT = Line Out Time
DT = Down Time
RT = Repair Time
MT = Maintenance Time

ST = SOT+EST+WOT+LOT+DT+RT+MT

This calculation is based on an operating assumption that the current day
machines are placed into "pause" mode during maintenance and repair time.  As
a result the availability counters will continue to increment even when the
turbine is being serviced.

Let's get together and discuss,
Hollis


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Anne C. Koehler
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Anne Koehler
Report Total: $3,527.39
Amount Due Employee: $3,527.39

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude31.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas31.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil31.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded31.pdf

Nov WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clx-qox.pdf
Dec Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Dec Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Nov Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-hox.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Nov/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG31.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG31.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL31.pdf

Scott Oblander
312-762-1015
312-762-1014 fax
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606


Please attend a meeting at the following time and location to start discussions on gas quality on Northern's system.

		Day			Thursday
		Date			November 8
		Time			2:00 to 3:30 pm
		Location		Video Conference  ECN 42C2/OMA 696

I would like to start the dialogue in what will be a series of meetings to discuss the impact of non-spec gas on Northern's system and explore solutions to the problems created by the non-spec gas.  The following list of issues will be addressed on November 8 and at subsequent meetings.  Randy and Danny, will you please select a representative or representatives from your respective regions to be a participants on this project?

List of Issues to be explored:

	Identify the contaminants/gas quality problems

	What is our tariff specification of each contaminant?

	System impacts resulting to taking non-spec gas

	Cost to system to accept non-spec gas

	Revenue impact of non-spec gas

	What is the tariff spec of other interconnecting pipelines?

	Possible solutions by region and contaminant/problem

	Impact of proposed rules which will require Northern to post tariff waivers on gas quality

This list of issues will be expanded and modified as this project moves forward.  Please feel free to contact me if you have questions.

Feel free to invite others to this meting that I have not included in the notification of this meeting.

						Penny McCarran


Mike,

Thanks for your message.  You are on point as to my intent.  From the
discussion I had with Andy last week, there seems to be several similarities
between the Metals business and industrial markets.  I believe the blueprint
that is forthcoming will provide more insight that will be helpful to you
all.  We would love to share this with you, and also discuss your system
direction.  There may be some opportunities for us to work together on the
development.  I would like to have a discussion to talk about next steps, and
believe Andy is planning to initiate this after he returns from holiday.  Let
me know if you have some other ideas.

I'm sorry that we didn't have a chance to get together last week while I was
in London.  My trip was very short, and I kept missing you when I went to
your desk.  I'll plan some time with you when I'm there next time.

Mike Jordan
01/24/2001 07:51 AM
To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Metals

Brenda

It strikes me that the planning documentation could be enormously useful to
us in backtesting our existing processes and determining any potential
overlaps

Is there any obstacle to access to this information ?

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           23/01/2001 23:40

To: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Wallace/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roy Lipsett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jill
Lafave/ENRON@enronXgate, Delmar Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Daniel
Hamilton/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Re: Metals

Andy,

Thanks so much for your message.  I had you on my "To Do" list today to
follow-up from our conversation last week.  I appreciate your responses, and
will follow-up as needed.

Just to recap EIM's current inititives.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) was engaged in 10/00 to develop a business plan
for tactical and strategic solutions for the projected growth in the physical
business.  In 11/00, AA was engaged to develop a "Blueprint" of EIM major
processes (Deal Execution, Deal Capture, Risk Management, Logistics,
Settlements and Financial Reporting), down to level 2 processes.  The
initiatives have been combined into one team focused on delivering the
"Blueprint", a gap analysis of Enron systems to business needs and
recommended systems.  A complete "roadmap" should be laid out with a
0-3months, 4-6months, 7-9 months and 10-12months timeline.  The plan
addresses tactical also.

Our overall objective:  Build an infrastructure (people, processes and
systems) that is scalable and supports the trading business of EIM.  The
current industries are Forest Products and Steel.  However, additional
industries may be added.  The targeted infrastructure would require little
change to support new industries.

The delieverable is expected by the end of 2/01.  We'd be happy to visit with
you all (video conference or Houston,....) to give you more information.  Let
me know how to proceed.

Thanks again for your time.  Since I wasn't able to attend the Controllers'
Conference last 10/00, I'm glad I got to meet you last week.  Stay in touch.

Brenda

To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Wallace/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Metals

Brenda

As discussed at our meeting last week there are a few areas of commonality
between Enron Metals and EIM that should allow leverage off common goals.

In particular I promised info on a few areas:

Project Q assessment

A lot of the issues raised in the report are particular to Enron Metals
(being to do with interfaces with our AS400 ysstem) however high level issues
which formed part of the decision to not develop this for Enron metals were:
Q is over specified for metals. Traffic / logistics for metals is less
complex than oil & coal.
Metals process tends towards Buy>Store>Sell whereas for liquids the storage
is not as prevelant
Metals logistics typically involves trucks whereas liquids is ship/barge

2.    Inventory Controls

Again the reports produced here have been very specific to Enron Metals. Paul
Wallace a manager in the co-ordination function is working extensively on
developing the controls in this area. I would suggest that you contact Paul
directly if you wish to discuss specific areas or inventory controls in
general.

3.    Funding of inventory

We have a structured finance facility here in London. The deal is specific to
Enron Metals markets in that it works by reference to LME prices as these are
the base index for all the positions placed in the facility. If structured
financing is sort for EIM then it would be appropriate to talk to either
David Tregar (Metals Commercial) or Bill Appleby (Global Finance) as an intro
to the issues faced.

4.    Curve Management Process

The markets in which our merchanting division trades are based on the LME
curves but are linked to a large number of basis curves for quality and
location. Given the vast number we have opted to break down the markets by
brand group and port location. E.G. for Copper this means we have a grid with
5 brand groups and 3 sets of port groups (13 for europe, 7 for the US and 6
for the Far East). The maintaince & price testing of the grids is made
manageable by the fact the premiums only need be entered for brand and port
groups by the traders yet prices can be tested by reference to node points
i.e. price of  specific brand at a given location which can be checked to a
market quote.

5.    Re recruitment of paper traders

I haven't been able to contact him but I recall that the brother of David
Rosenblum, one of the metals traders in Chicago, is a trader of recylced
paper.

I'll keep you posted on long term system development plans here in London.
I'd appreciate same for EIM.

Regards
Andy


PGS is pleased to announce its new winter/spring seminar
schedule for Houston and Philadelphia. (See seminar list below).

For more information, call 412-279-9298 or visit
http://www.pgsenergy.com/schedule.html

Please forward this information to anyone who might benefit from
a better understanding of energy derivatives, risk management,
gas-to-electricity arbitrage, statistics or electric power trading.

Available seminars include:
   1) Fundamentals of Energy Futures, Options & Derivatives
   2) Fundamentals of the Electric Power Industry
   3) Gas-to-Electricity Arbitrage & How to Maximize the
       Profitability of Electric Generation Assets
   4) Developing Effective Risk Management Policies
       & Procedures (John Wengler)
   5) Fundamentals of Statistical Analysis (Dr. Ken Skinner)
   6) How to Value Electric Generation Assets as Real Options
   7) Fundamentals of Value-at-Risk (Soli Forouzan)

Save money by bringing a group of 4 or more. With a group
rate, your cost for our $1,295 seminars is reduced to $895 per
attendee-- a savings of $1,600 from our regular prices. The
group price for the $695 programs is $495.

Thank you.

John Adamiak
PGS Energy Training


He would not have had a clue how to do Valero, but he seems to think
so...........................

I give..............................

No mas!

Let's finish this stuff up and call it a day.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Seaman/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2000
01:12 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           01/10/2000 01:03 PM

To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Seaman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Industrial Accounts

As of January 2000, I have taken over scheduling all "Industrial Accounts"
without the assistance of
   Kenneth Seaman.

   I want to thank Ken for all of his efforts during our training period.

  Ken has help me feel confident  to continue this responsibility with
little, if any,  assistance from himself.
 Thus,   please forward all correspondence to me directly in the future.


FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/20/99 03:26
PM ---------------------------
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: London originated financial transactions: DAPSA and Sempra

As per our conversation, ECT is not to engage in business in the UK and, in
this regard, is not to have business transacted by it or on its behalf
anywhere except in the United States.  Accordingly, trades entered into by
persons outside of the United States should not be confirmed as ECT trades.
I hope all finds you well.  Best regards.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/18/2000
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,280
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,284
Total Life to Date Transactions	532,702

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/18/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,605	74%
Enron Europe Limited	236	44%
Global Products	107	25%
Enron Metals	332	13%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,282,622,519
MTD	42,383,801,811
LTD	321,240,640,882
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,374,361,431

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	21,691,831,118

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	615
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	3
Number of Products Offered Today	1,054
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,239
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,031


I got 4.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"George, Mike (CA - Calgary)" <migeorge@deloitte.ca>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22George+2C+20Mike+20+28CA+20-+20Calgary+29+22+20+3Cmigeorge+40deloitte+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, June 21, 2001 9:26 AM
To:	Dorland, Dan; 'Casandra'; Dorland, Chris; 'Lisa Player'; 'She-rhino!'; 'Ry-Ry'; Kroon, Cassandra (CA - Calgary)
Subject:	Read text first!!!

Check this out!  It's hard, so good luck finding four or five things!
This is a simple psychoanalytic test to measure your memory.
Open the first superman picture.
Memorize it and open the second.
Without reopening the first try to note each of the differences between the
two pictures.  There are at least three.  If you can find five or more, you
are of above average intelligence.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com << File: http://www.hotmail.com >> .

 - superman1.jpg << File: superman1.jpg >>
 - superman2.jpg << File: superman2.jpg >>


We have another new addition to the Portland West Desk.  Beginning today,
Craig Dean has joined the Real-Time Trading group.

Prior to Enron, Craig worked as a statistics Intern at US West, a Financial
Advisor with H&R Block, and most recently, as a Financial Advisor at Morgan
Stanley. He is a '96 graduate of Washington State University with a degree in
Accounting and Finance.

Please welcome Craig to our Portland Office!


---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/2000 01:44 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 01:43 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: REVISED ALREADY     - CNG JAN 00 numbers

Please up that to 2,300 dth's/day     starting   1 JAN 2000.

Thanks again!

---------------------- Forwarded by Heidi Boyd/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/27/99
02:41 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 02:41 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: CNG JAN 00 numbers

Hi Morgan,

Please schedule a daily total of 2095 to NYSEG off of CNG for Jan 2000.

Thanks!


I think we should have a version which says that "ken Lay named ... "  I don't know that the Board actually does the electing, I think Ken may just be making sure that they are OK with his decision.  I will confirm.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 8:27 PM
To:	Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Kean, Steven J.; Koenig, Mark
Subject:	draft OTC communication

 << File: OTCrelease.doc >>  << File: OTCQ&A.doc >>  << File: OTCemployeememo.doc >>


can you guys follow up on this payment issue?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Versen, Victoria
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:35 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	FW: Ashland Chemicals
Importance:	High

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McFatridge, Thomas
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Versen, Victoria
Subject:	FW: Ashland Chemicals
Importance:	High

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McFatridge, Thomas
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:35 AM
To:	Rohauer, Tanya
Cc:	Baxter, Bryce; Valderrama, Lisa; Eubanks Jr., David W.
Subject:	Ashland Chemicals
Importance:	High

Tanya,

This is a follow-up to my two calls this morning.  I have talked to Pat Ebert at Ashland.  I asked her why they refuse to pay their October 2001 invoices.  She said that her management wants to speak to someone in upper management at Enron.  I asked to speak to her manager and was told that she was in a meeting.  I asked her to get her out of the meeting.  She did not comply.  Her managers name is Sherry Tackett.  Her phone number is 614-790-6941.  I left her a messsage.  I told her that I expect payment for the ENA upstream, for 559,000+, and for ENA for 374,000+.  I also told her she received to commodity so the payment is due.  I told her  expect it today.  I left my phone number and told her to call me as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Tom McFatridge
58189


Yes.

From: Tana Jones on 03/20/2001 03:47 PM CST
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Procedures for Financial Confirmations

Good memo Peter.  Is it OK if I forward this to the Credit Team so they also
know how this process will work?

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Sharon Crawford
	03/20/2001 03:44 PM

		 To: Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark
Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Procedures for Financial Confirmations

Please see attached memo.


FYI
----- Forwarded by Paul Finken/Enron Communications on 11/28/00 05:16 PM -----

	Tana Jones@ECT
	11/16/00 11:47 AM

		 To: Paul Finken/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised NDA-Purchase Pooling

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 11:47 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	11/16/2000 11:46 AM

		 To: jnugent@purchasepooling.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised NDA-Purchase Pooling

At the request of Leslie Hansen, I am enclosing a clean and redlined draft of
the revised NDA.


Kay:

I'd like to talk to you about the attached letter. Thanks.


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Friday, October   05, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Thursday, October   04, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	         $22.00	         $19.00	         $21.44	+    .45	         102,400
Comed	         $20.75	         $18.00	         $20.03	+    .85	           9,600
Entergy	         $21.00	         $17.70	         $18.64	+    .81	          13,600
Nepool	         $37.50	         $36.75	         $37.21	+   1.71	           9,600
PJM-West	         $29.75	         $28.25	         $29.01	+    .12	          32,000
SP-15	         $24.50	         $23.50	         $24.08	-   1.58	           4,800
TVA	         $22.50	         $21.00	         $21.89	+   1.35	          10,400

                                                                                Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
This information is sent to you free of charge and may be redistributed in its entirety.  Republishing in any other form is prohibited.
If this was forwarded by a friend and you would like to receive your own daily bulletin, click here to subscribe .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


If you haven't received the details yet, here they are (Enron sells):

 30,000 MMBtu/d   Nov '00 - Mar '01   ANR LA @ Index + $0.01
 30,000 MMBtu/d   Nov '00 - Mar '01   NGP LA @ Index + $0.01
 40,000 MMBtu/d   Nov '00 - Mar '01   TRUNK LA @ Index + $0.01

If you need anything else,

Fletch
x3-6219


Stacey,

Please include me on the list for Tuesday's brown bag with Jen Fraser.

Thanks,
Susan


After having conducted our first of several business reviews, Enron Global
Markets - Office of the Chairman would like to outline the following
organizational changes effective immediately.

The Global Risk Markets group under Jere Overdyke illustrates enormous
opportunities given the size of those businesses.  To better focus on the
different commercial functions and to capture market share and value, the
group is being realigned.  Jere will continue to manage Global Risk Markets
and build on our insurance capabilities.  Mark Tawney is responsible for our
weather business and will now report to the EGM Office of the Chairman.

Brent Price will be joining Enron Global Markets as Vice President of
Operations and Chief Accounting Officer.  He will report to the EGM Office of
the Chairman, and to Sally Beck, Vice President of Global Risk Management
Operations.  In his role as Chief Accounting Officer, Brent will also report
to Rick Causey, Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer for
Enron Corp.  Reporting to Brent in his new position will be Sheila Glover,
business controller for Financial Products; Todd Hall, business controller
for weather; and Scott Earnest, business controller for global products and
coal.  In addition, Tom Myers will join Brent's management team as Director
of Accounting.  Brent and his team are responsible for all accounting, risk
reporting and trading operations for all the businesses within EGM.

Cindy Skinner will join the Enron Global Markets team with responsibility for
Human Resources.  She will also report to David Oxley and the HR organization.

Please join us in congratulating everyone in their assignments.


from today's LA Times....

Davis is essentially endorsing the CPUC's proposed rate design where
Residential pays less than their share, ie. less than the 3cents.
He is also suggesting that, contrary to the CPUC decision last week, that
some of the increase go to bailing out the IOU's
-- if they sell the transmission.

Davis Acknowledges Need for Rate Hike

                                                           Electricity: In a
statewide TV broadcast, he says the average would be 26.5%. For
                                                        the first time, he
calls situation a "crisis."

                                                        By DAN MORAIN, Times
Staff Writer

SACRAMENTO--After spending months voicing opposition to rate hikes, Gov.
                                                        Gray Davis
acknowledged to a statewide television audience Thursday night the need
                                                        for an electricity
rate increase that would average 26.5%.
                                                             For the first
time calling it an "energy crisis," Davis enumerated steps he has taken,
                                                        then said he has
fought "tooth and nail against raising rates." But citing a need for
                                                        increases, the
Democratic governor called for a tiered system in which people who use
                                                        the most electricity
pay the most--as much as 37% more if they use more than twice
                                                        their minimum
allotment.
                                                             "Here's the
point: The more you use, the more you pay," Davis said. "The more you
                                                        conserve, the more
you save. Conservation is our best short-term weapon against
                                                        blackouts and price
gouging."
                                                             Davis said his
proposed rate plan is sufficient to help reduce the $13-billion debt of
                                                        Southern California
Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric. Although the bulk of the rate
                                                        increase would be
used to help California finance bonds for long-term power
                                                        purchases, about 10%
to 15% would be earmarked for the utilities--so long as they
                                                        agree to sell their
transmission lines to the state, according to the administration.
                                                             The decision to
offer the utilities at least some rate hike monies brought a sharp
                                                        response from
lawmakers. Consumer advocates also are sure to be unhappy.
                                                             "We are not in
this business to bail out these guys," said Senate President Pro Tem
                                                        John Burton (D-San
Francisco).
                                                             Added Harry
Snyder of Consumers Union: "Absolute giveaway . . . He is going to
                                                        pay them off
completely for all their mistakes."
                                                             The governor
took the unusual step of reserving air time on statewide television at a
                                                        time when he is
slipping in polls and surveys show that the public is increasingly
                                                        concerned about the
energy crisis. Gov. Pete Wilson took a similar step during the
                                                        recession in 1992
when he moved to raise taxes and cut government spending.
                                                             The speech took
on greater urgency as the California Independent System
                                                        Operator, the entity
that oversees power distribution, warned Thursday that the state
                                                        will face 34 days of
rotating blackouts if consumers and businesses use the same
                                                        amount of electricity
this summer that they did last year. The blackouts could be
                                                        extensive enough to
darken 5 million homes at once.
                                                             The governor's
speech came hours after the Legislature approved a record $1.1
                                                        billion in energy
conservation measures designed to provide consumers with incentives
                                                        to reduce electricity
use.
                                                             In his speech,
Davis renewed his call to Californians to curtail electricity use by at
                                                        least 10%, even as a
new report was issued warning that the state faces repeated
                                                        summer blackouts
because of a major gap in the supply of power during the coming
                                                        months.
                                                             "We are 34
million strong, and if each of us does our part, we can minimize
                                                        disruptions and get
through the summer," Davis said.
                                                             The governor did
not speak in detail on any issue, including the rate hike. The talk
                                                        lasted a mere five
minutes, delivered in fewer than 800 words.
                                                             Under Davis'
proposal, Southern California Edison residential customers would face
                                                        an average increase
of 2.21 cents per kilowatt hour. San Diego Gas & Electric
                                                        customers would have
a 2.57-cent hike, while Pacific Gas & Electric would have a
                                                        2.44-cent boost.
Business rates would rise slightly more.
                                                             Davis blamed the
rate hikes on rising natural gas prices, a lack of adequate
                                                        generation and the
federal government's refusal to cap wholesale power prices.
                                                             Rates for
customers of the state's two largest utilities rose 9% in January. That boost
                                                        remains in effect.
Legislation approved earlier this year bars further rate increases for
                                                        those who use up to
30% more than their so-called baseline allocation.
                                                             According to
administration estimates, 53% of consumers would experience no rate
                                                        hike beyond the 9%
boost approved in January. A fourth of all households would face
                                                        increases averaging
34.5%.
                                                             Under the
proposal, which requires Public Utilities Commission approval, people
                                                        who use up to 200% of
their baseline allocation would see rates on that portion of their
                                                        electricity use go up
by 9%, plus the 9% already imposed for a total of 18%.
                                                             Electricity
users who consume more than twice their baseline allocation would pay
                                                        between 33% and 37%
more for kilowatts used beyond 200% of their baseline
                                                        allocation.
                                                             Davis' proposed
rate increase is somewhat lower than that proposed by the PUC, in
                                                        part because he had
more information, including the price that the state is paying for
                                                        electricity, his
aides said.
                                                             "My proposal
raises rates fairly, assures us of long-term power, stabilizes the utilities
                                                        and promotes
conservation," Davis said.
                                                             Although there
has been wide news coverage of the crisis, the governor's aides said
                                                        Davis felt a need to
talk directly to Californians to sum up the steps that he has taken to
                                                        solve the problem.
                                                             Perhaps adding
to the urgency, utility customers could start seeing increases in their
                                                        bills as early as
next month. Further raising the stakes for the speech, Davis warned this
                                                        week that supplies
will be so short that there could be blackouts by the end of the
                                                        month, and continue
into May and June.
                                                             "The public is
more aware of what is going on on this issue than any other issue I
                                                        have seen, ever,"
said Democratic political consultant Gale Kaufman. "People have
                                                        gotten three or four
bills that they're unhappy with and they may have been in a
                                                        blackout or two.
There is a concern for the future.
                                                             "By not talking
to the public for a long time," Kaufman said, "and focusing it on one
                                                        speech in one day,
people will dissect this five minutes, much more than if he would
                                                        have had a regular
dialogue."
                                                             In what some
political consultants see as a reflection of Davis' declining political
                                                        strength, a recent
Times poll showed that in Davis' hometown of Los Angeles, only
                                                        14% are more likely
to vote for a candidate endorsed by Davis, while 21% would be
                                                        less likely.
                                                             Several recent
private polls show that a majority of Californians would not vote to
                                                        reelect Davis if he
were on the ballot today, though Davis does not face voters in a
                                                        general election for
19 months, giving him plenty of time to recover.
                                                             "People need to
be reassured that there is a strong sense of direction," said Bill
                                                        Carrick, a Democratic
consultant. "I don't think people are looking for a magic wand.
                                                        But they need a sense
that there is sense of direction."
                                                             Other political
consultants said Davis used television to get his message out because
                                                        newspaper accounts
have raised questions about his handling of the situation. Also,
                                                        voters who get the
bulk of their information from television news generally have less
                                                        knowledge about the
nuances of the crisis.
                                                             "He is not doing
well with the print story," said Republican consultant Wayne C.
                                                        Johnson, "so he has
decided to change venues."
                                                             Johnson, like
many consultants, also said the governor's declining poll numbers likely
                                                        influenced his
decision to make the television appearance, carried on most stations
                                                        across the state
during 6 p.m. news shows.
                                                             "Gray Davis
doesn't do anything that the polls don't dictate," Johnson said. "He is
                                                        doing this because
the polls show his support is in free-fall."
                                                             Until Thursday,
Davis had not characterized the situation as a "crisis," instead calling
                                                        it a "challenge."
That euphemism raised the hackles of many legislators.
                                                             "It's pretty
clear: The public is angry and scared," said state Sen. Don Perata
                                                        (D-Alameda). "They
want a sense that someone is in control, and that there is some
                                                        certitude of where
we're going. We're lacking both."
                                                             The Legislature,
meanwhile, approved two measures touted as ways to cut the
                                                        state's power needs
this summer, when hot temperatures traditionally cause demand to
                                                        surge--a situation
that this year could result in blackouts.
                                                             The bills had
been bogged down in squabbling between the Assembly and Senate.
                                                        The delay raises
questions about whether the conservation incentives will be in place
                                                        long enough to have
an immediate effect.
                                                             The bills, a
$709-million measure by state Sen. Byron Sher (D-Stanford) and a
                                                        $409-million measure
by Assemblywoman Christine Kehoe (D-San Diego), contain a
                                                        dizzying range of
financial "carrots" designed to help people cut power use.
                                                             There is $50
million to help low- and moderate-income consumers replace
                                                        energy-wasting
appliances such as old refrigerators with new, more energy-efficient
                                                        equipment, $60
million to help consumers replace older lighting systems, $7 million to
                                                        teach school children
about energy efficiency, and $50 million for electricity meters for
                                                        businesses.
                                                             The Senate bill
won final passage on a 31-6 vote; the Assembly bill cleared the
                                                        Legislature on a
55-15 vote. However, not everyone supported the concept of
                                                        government subsidies
to reduce power use.
                                                             Meanwhile,
utility watchers issued gloomy reports early Thursday, helping to drag
                                                        down the stocks of
Edison International and PG&E Corp., parent corporations of the
                                                        beleaguered
utilities. Edison closed at $12.64 per share, down 34 cents or 2.6%, while
                                                        PG&E fell to $11.38
per share, down 27 cents or 2.3%, on the New York Stock
                                                        Exchange.
                                                             Standard &
Poor's said it is unlikely that Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas
                                                        & Electric will
regain a sound credit rating soon. The Wall Street debt-rating firm
                                                        lowered the
utilities' credit rating to high-risk junk-bond status in January when they
                                                        began defaulting on
debt.
                                                             Standard &
Poor's cited a lack of action by Davis and state legislators, and said rate
                                                        increases approved by
the PUC will not be sufficient to pay all electricity costs. Banks
                                                        and other creditors
will run out of patience before long unless a settlement is reached to
                                                        help the utilities
pay past debts, Standard & Poor's said.
                                                             The firm
predicted that "the coming weeks are likely to be critical if the utilities
are to
                                                        be made financially
sound companies once again and avoid bankruptcy proceedings."


Vopak USA Inc. was overlayed in GCP over Van Waters & Rogers Inc., CP ID
9784.  Details attached.

The shortname changes for this week will be made this morning.

Records will be inactivated on Tue., 05/01/01, late afternoon.


Is it lunch or dinner on May 10?

From: Karen Marshall on 04/06/2001 09:51 AM
To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Working on May 10th Dinner for Scholarship recipients

Rick & Sally,

I have phoned all of the scholarship recipients and left messages for them
regarding dinner on May 10th.  I should have an answer by Monday.

Thanks,

Karen
----- Forwarded by Karen Marshall/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001 09:48 AM -----

	Karen Marshall
	03/28/2001 08:12 PM

		 To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gene
Humphrey/Enron@EnronXGate, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Brent A
Price/Enron@EnronXGate, Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christie
Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loftus Fitzwater/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger
Ondreko/Enron@EnronXGate, Andrea V Reed/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwynn Gorsuch/NA/Enron@ENRON, Elyse
Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bert
Frazier/Enron@EnronXGate, Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
eloy.garcia@bus.utexas.edu
		 Subject: UT/Enron MBA Excellence 2001 Scholarship Winners Announced!

I am pleased to announce the recipients of the 2001 University of Texas Enron
MBA Excellence Scholarships:

Christopher Cashman
SooPang Tang
Holland Brown

Each student will receive $10,000 in scholarship money based on their essays,
interviews and on how they exemplified the vision, values and beliefs of
Enron.
I have already notified  the winners, so  please join me in congratulating
each one on a job well done.

Special thanks to everyone who participated in the selection of the
winners.   Stay tuned for details on the date and time for the Scholarship
Awards dinner slated for early next semester!

 E-mail: christopher.cashman@mba02.bus.utexas.edu Phone:  512-836-6489
 E-mail: soopang.tang@mba02.bus.utexas.edu Phone:  512-708-0161
 E-mail: holland.brown@mba02.bus.utexas.edu Phone:  512-440-1142

FYI... All of the candidates that interviewed were outstanding according to
the scholarship interview team (Sally Beck, Andrea Reed, Roger Ondreko and
Loftus Fitzwater).  I will be sending each of them a letter to thank them for
their participation and encourage them to consider Enron when interviewing
for full time opportunities next semester.

Thank you,

Karen Marshall


no comments this month

DENISE LAGESSE
12/20/99 02:35 PM
To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Philip
Crowley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret
Reich/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Friendly Reminder: Monthly Significant Litigation Report

I have not yet received your comments to the Monthly Report, which is
attached below.  Please send your comments to me (not Emily) as soon as
possible.  If you do not have comments this month, please let me know so that
I can mark you off the list.  Thanks very much! :)

---------------------- Forwarded by Denise LaGesse/ET&S/Enron on 12/20/99
02:27 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Emily Sellers                           12/16/99 09:25 AM

To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Candace
Kyle/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Philip Crowley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret Reich/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Phillips/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Eric
Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  (bcc: Denise LaGesse/ET&S/Enron)

Subject: Monthly Significant Litigation Report

Attached is November's Monthly Report.  I know I'm asking for your revisions
to it earlier than usual, but with everyone being out during the holidays
(myself included) we decided it would be easier to incorporate changes you
make to this report into the Weekly so you only have to update one report.

Denise Lagesse is going to do the updates next week for me while I'm on
vacation so send your changes and new items to her by Friday, December
17th.....Thanks....and Merry Christmas everybody......!!!!!


Hi John,

Neil and I discussed this last night.  I know we are interested in at least
as many games as we had last year.  I'll check with him and get back to you.

Hope all is well.  I haven't forgotten you!

Kay


please print the xcel document.  SS
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 03:31 PM -----

	Melissa Ann Murphy
	09/19/2000 11:49 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fiancial Power Trades through 9/18/00

I have updated the above documents.

Thanks,
Melissa


I don't think I'm going to go either.  Let me know about poker though.
Shannan

W. Shannan O'Shaughnessy
Subsea Facilities Engineer
ILX Projects, GOM DWP
*:281-366-4567
*:oshaugws@bp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason.Wolfe@enron.com [mailto:Jason.Wolfe@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 3:42 PM
To: O'Shaughnessy, W. Shannan
Subject: Re: FW: UH ChemE Alumni Reception tomorrow

Don't worry. It sounds like Chastant is going, at least.
I would consider going, except I don't work in engineering, and I don't
like Chastant.

You can convince me if you are definitely going and I can show up around 7.

Jason


Part One

The New Power Company BOD 9/5/2001 - the directors requested an offsite strategy meeting after the BOD meeting on 9/5/2001.  Will you be available between the hours of 1 - 4:00 p.m. EST?

Part Two

Joanne Gregory - Winston & Strawn

She said the date of June 27th is good for herself and all these people.  She said there are more people she wants to bring.  To date, she wants to bring:

Herself
Bruce Toth - Corp.
Jerry Farano - Broadband
Steve Molo - Litigator
Chris Mcisaac - Energy Project/Facility Deals
Chris Chase
Charlie Papavizas - Maritime
Tim Oxley - Finance
Andy NcDonough - Finance

Who do you want to invite from here?
If you want a conference room meeting, I need to get a room she can use Power Point, which means either the Dining Room or the Board Room - which do you want?

Any help you can give me with regard to these two "Parts" would be gratefully appreciated.

S


Vince,

 I understand you'll be speaking at the CEFER conference. Gary Taylor, the
head of marketing in the Weather Deriv. group, would like to know if you plan
on mentioning weather derivatives at all and that if you do, he has numerous
existing slides and presentations that might be useful to you.

Joe

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Angela Dorsey  [mailto:Angela.Dorsey@bus.utexas.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 9:06 PM
To: Angela Dorsey
Cc: Ehud Ronn ; Sheridan Titman (E-mail)
Subject: Invitation to 2001 Energy Finance Conference - The University of
Texas at Austin

Colleagues and Friends of the Center for Energy Finance Education and
Research (CEFER):

Happy New Year! Hope you all had a wonderful holiday season.

On behalf of the University of Texas Finance Department and CEFER, we
would
like to cordially invite you to attend our:

2001 Energy Finance Conference
Austin, Texas
February 22 - 23, 2001
Hosted by the University of Texas Finance Department
Center for Energy Finance Education and Research

Dr. Ehud I. Ronn and Dr. Sheridan Titman are currently in the process of
finalizing the details of the conference agenda.  We have listed the
agenda
outline below to assist you in your travel planning.  Each conference
session will be composed of a panel discussion between 3 - 4 guest
speakers
on the designated topic.

As supporters of the Center for Energy Finance Education and Research,
representatives of our trustee corporations (Enron, El Paso, Reliant,
Conoco, and Southern) will have the $500 conference fee waived.
The conference package includes Thursday evening's cocktails &
dinner and hotel/UT shuttle service, as well as Friday's conference
meals,
session materials and shuttle service.  Travel to Austin and hotel
reservations are each participant's responsibility.

A limited number of hotel rooms are being tentatively held at the
Radisson
Hotel on Town Lake under the group name "University of Texas Finance
Department" for the nights of Thursday, 2/22/01 and Friday, 2/23/01 (the
latter evening for those who choose to stay in Austin after the
Conference's conclusion).  To guarantee room reservations, you will need
to
contact the Radisson Hotel at (512) 478-9611 no later than Monday,
January
22nd, and make your reservations with a credit card.  Please let me know
when you have made those arrangements so that I can make sure the
Radisson
gives you the special room rate of $129/night.

Please RSVP your interest in attending this conference NO LATER THAN
JANUARY 22nd to angela.dorsey@bus.utexas.edu, or (512) 232-7386, as
seating
availability is limited.  Please feel free to extend this invitation to
your colleagues who might be interested in attending this Conference.

Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
PROGRAM OF THE 2001 ENERGY FINANCE CONFERENCE
February 22 - 23, 2001

Thursday, Feb 22:

3:00 p.m. Reserved rooms at the Radisson Hotel available for
check-in
5:30 p.m. Bus will pick up guests at the Radisson for transport to
UT Club*
6:00 p.m. Cocktails, UT Club 9th Floor
7:00 p.m. Dinner, UT Club
8:00 p.m. Keynote Speaker
9:00 p.m. Bus will transport guests back to hotel

Friday, Feb 23:

7:45 a.m. Bus will pick up at the Radisson for transport to UT

8:30 a.m. Session 1 - REAL OPTIONS
  Panelists:  Jim Dyer, UT (Chair)
    Sheridan Titman, UT
    John McCormack, Stern Stewart & Co.

10:00 a.m. Coffee Break

10:15 a.m. Session 2 - DEREGULATION
  Panelists:  David Eaton, UT (Chair)
    David Spence, UT
    Jeff Sandefer, Sandefer Capital
Partners/UT
    Peter Nance, Teknecon Energy Risk
Advisors

11:45 a.m. Catered Lunch & Keynote Speaker

1:30 p.m. Guest Tour - EDS Financial Trading & Technology Center

2:00 p.m. Session 3 - RISK MANAGEMENT
  Panelists:  Keith Brown, UT (Chair)
    Vince Kaminski, Enron
    Alexander Eydeland, Southern Co.
    Ehud I. Ronn, UT

3:30 p.m. Snack Break

3:45 p.m. Session 4 - GLOBALIZATION OF THE ENERGY BUSINESS
  Panelists:  Laura Starks, UT (Chair)
    Bob Goldman, Conoco
    Ray Hill, Southern Co.

5:15 p.m. Wrap-Up

5:30 p.m. Bus picks up for transport to airport/dinner

6:30 p.m. Working dinner for senior officers of Energy Finance
Center
Trustees

*We have made arrangements to provide shuttle service between the
Radisson
hotel and UT during the conference. However, if you choose to stay at an
alternative hotel, then transportation to conference events
will become your responsibility.

**************
Angela Dorsey
Assistant Director
Center for Energy Finance Education & Research
The University of Texas at Austin
Department of Finance, CBA 6.222
Austin, TX 78712
angela.dorsey@bus.utexas.edu
**************


Sara and Cheryl,
This related to the CREDIT Book only.
Sheila

From: Sara Shackleton on 02/14/2001 06:13 PM
To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Cheryl:

Enron Credit Inc. , a  Delaware corporation, has been created for U.S. debt
trading currently handled by ENA.   As a result, ENA will need to transfer
its brokerage debt positions to Enron Credit Inc. accounts with those
brokers.  The brokers include our favorites:

Bear Stearns Companies
Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.
Goldman Sachs & Co.

ENA will need to assign its positions by the end of February, 2001.
Richard Sage (London office) will need to see the "sample package" (unanimous
consent, authorized trader list).  Will you please see that an email is sent
to Richard with this information?

We should begin the documentation now.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


To the West Desk et al:

The FERC's west-wide price cap has been raised to at least $108/MWh beginning today through 30 April 02.  Please see the order excerpt below.  Although market prices are well below both the old and new cap, the new cap will give the markets more breathing room if there is an unexpected cold snap and/or supply disruption.

I am happy to report that the one of Enron's advocacy messages made it into the order: any change to the cap must be applied West-wide.  PNW parties and Duke were willing to settle with region-specific caps but FERC rejected that concept in favor of a single, West-wide value.

Alan Comnes

Relevant Passage:

"Effective on the trading day following the date of this order, through April 30, 2002, we will suspend the methodology used to calculate the current mitigated price and substitute the following West-wide winter season methodology. As a starting point, the
mitigated price will be set at $108/MWh. This is the actual mitigated price set using the current methodology during the last reserve deficiency on May 31, 2001, based on a gas index of $6.641/MMBtu, a generating unit with a heat rate of approximately 15,360 Btu/MWh and $6.00 for the O&M adder. The new interim mitigated price will supersede the existing mitigated price (approximately $92/MWh), which was set at eighty-five percent of the originally calculated $108/MWh mitigated price for application during non-reserve deficiency hours. We find this adjustment necessary to set the price for the winter period and to track changes in the gas indices.

The winter formula will maintain the current heat rate and O&M adder. The one variable in the formula will be tied to the current average of the mid-point for the monthly bid-week index prices reported for SoCal Gas (large packages), Malin and PG&E city-gate. Under the winter season formula, the mitigated price will be recalculated when the average gas price rises by a minimum factor of 10 percent (e.g., to $7.305/MMBtu) effective for the following trading day. The formula will also track subsequent
cumulative changes of at least 10 percent (including reductions of 10 percent, but not less than a floor of $108/Mwh). Effective on May 1, 2002, the summer methodology will be reinstated along with the current mitigated price of approximately $92/Mwh for non-emergency periods."


z/f trading 4


Under the circumstances, I am leaning toward cancelling (I was originally only going to participate on Monday anyway, and Sue hadn't planned on attending. Neither Rick nor Jim can attend.)  If there's a compelling reason that you think I should attend, let me know.  Otherwise I'll let Bev know that we'll take a rain check on this one.

Best,
Jeff


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From:  infopost@duke-energy.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-infopost+40duke-energy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:35 PM
To: infopost@duke-energy.com
Subject: TE Pipeline Conditions

May 15, 2001

Texas Eastern Transmission (TE) is scheduled full in the access area
zones STX and ETX, and also in zone M1 24".  No increases in physical
receipts will be scheduled for receipt points between Fagus compressor
station (FGS) and Blessing compressor station (BLE) for gas day May 16,
2001.  Planned maintenance at the Blessing compressor station should be
completed sometime during Wednesday, May 16, and the pipeline system
should be back to normal operations for gas day May 17, 2001.

Please contact your Operations Account Manager if you have any
questions.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030824.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/8/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_WATER
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Kim.
I will keep you updated as we move forward from here.
Thanks again.
Kirk

-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly [mailto:Kimberly.Watson@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:40 PM
To: Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources)
Subject: RE: Big Sandy Delivery Point Construction and Operating
Agreement - Revised

Kirk,

Well, I am sorry that the project was denied a permit yesterday.  I know
that you (and many others) have worked very hard on this project.
Transwestern is still very interested in having Big Sandy connect to our
pipe.  I will stay in touch with you over the next few months, but
please don't hesitate to call me if there is anything we can do to help
you.

Thanks for keeping me posted,
Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources) [mailto:KetcheKL@bp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:44 AM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: Big Sandy Delivery Point Construction and Operating
Agreement - Revised

Hi Kim.
I trust that you are hanging in there with all of the recent activity.
As for Big Sandy, the project was denied a "permit" yesterday by the ACC
commissioners, driven principally by water issues.
As for next steps, Caithness plans to submit a new filing for the same
project, getting their "ducks in a row" on the water issues, and perhaps
even conceding to the potential of dry cooling versus wet cooling.
They expect to file this within the next 60 days.
Thus, with a little luck, we will be back in the game on this project
with
an induced delay.
I will keep you posted along the way....please do the same for me
regarding
any offerings/news/etc from your side.
Thanks for all of your help so far on the project.
Best regards.
Kirk

-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly [mailto:Kimberly.Watson@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources)
Subject: RE: Big Sandy Delivery Point Construction and Operating
Agreement - Revised

Hi Kirk,

I just wanted to check on you and see how the approval process was
going.  Have you heard from the ACC Commissioners yet?  Please let me
know if we can do anything for you.

Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources) [mailto:KetcheKL@bp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:30 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: Big Sandy Delivery Point Construction and Operating
Agreement - Revised

Hi Kim.
Just wanted to let you know that the Big Sandy project is awaiting a
vote
yes/no from the ACC Commissioners on the 26th of this month.
At this point, I think it is likely that the project will not be
approved,
and may opt to resubmit.
Counsel for Caithness in the appeal process suggested a negative bias in
the
ACC Power Plant Siting Committee, and that was not well received by the
Commissioners....major blunder.
I will keep you updated as this continues to develop.
If a yes vote, then we will proceed immediately with interconnect
agreement,
etc.
Best regards,
Kirk

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Remarkably clear explanation.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           09/20/2000 06:48 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: LM6000 Title Transfer Question

FYI, see below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 06:43 PM
---------------------------

Matthew Tezyk@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/20/2000 06:13 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby@ECT
cc: Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: LM6000 Title Transfer Question

Ben,

Does ENA wish to accept Title of 14 LM6000's on September 26, 2000, or accept
Title of these Units after each has been issued an Inspection Acceptance
Certificate from EECC QA/QC department?

The following is a summary of the LM6000 Title Transfer Question:

Mike Storm, GE/SSEP Project Manager, requested from me, on 9/19/00, to accept
title of 14 LM6000's no later 9/26/00.  I informed him I was not authorized
to make this decision and that I would contact the Owner to make the
decision.  I further informed Mike Storm that our Owner would not accept
those terms and a compromise must be worked out.
Contract Reference 15.2.1 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: title transfers
when equipment is ready to ship to the delivery point and seller notifies
purchaser of such event.
Delivery Point is defined as the SSEP storage yard.
SSEP has notified us that Units #1-14 are "Ready to Ship".
Contract Reference 10.2.3 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: purchaser has the
right to inspect the equipment for "completeness prior to loading on
transport to delivery point".
We have inspected the first eleven Units and have informed SSEP that Units
#1-14 ARE NOT COMPLETE and therefore are NOT at the Delivery Point.
FACT: Units # 1-11 are at the delivery point. #12-14 are at SSEP.
FACT: If we sent a truck to SSEP tomorrow, NONE of the UNITS would be "Ready
to Ship" to a project site.
FACT: SSEP QA/QC has 15 Non Conformance Reports on these 14 turbines which
need to be corrected before they are "Ready to Ship".
It is in the best interests for both companies to correct the Non
Conformance's prior to shipment to the delivery point or project site.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that we DO NOT accept Title until the Units are
actually ready to be shipped to a project site.  The problem is that NONE OF
THE UNITS ARE READY TO SHIP!  SSEP has to work off punchlist items which
their QA/QC department has listed on Non Conformance Reports.  At this
juncture, no money can be withheld from SSEP. To ensure they will be fixed,
Title should transfer after our QA/QC inspectors give written notice that
each Unit is complete and ready to ship.  This will protect ENA on the
quality of the machines, as well as, ensure that little or no "re-work" is
performed in the field.

If you require further information or any assistance in this matter, please
feel free to contact me at 713-646-8258.

Matthew Tezyk
Project Manager