IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Thursday, December  13, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Wednesday, December  12, 2001)
Click here to access index history


i am going there for basically two days the second week of aug.  i won't have
much time.  hopefully i will meet them for lunch or something but it is
definately going to be a short visit.  at least i will be back two weeks
later.  did grandma get her truck?    hopefully you and billy can make it
over labor day weekend.  i just bought a new car.  it is actually a used
chevy tahoe.  i love it.  it is so much nicer than the jeep.  it is too nice
for me but as long as i am meeting my goals in savings each month i think i
can afford it.  hope all is well.  tell billy hello.

matt


-----Original Message-----
From: STEVE KAROLYI
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 10:29 AM
To: MARY JANE SYMES
Subject: FW: The number one song the day you were born is your theme song
for life and. . .

-----Original Message-----
From: slahaie@drmartensusa.com
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 8:32 AM
To: slaken@columbiaforestproducts.com; janet.rivera@theplatform.com;
dakotanorth2000@hotmail.com; stevek@tvapdx.com; lgibbs@stastnybrun.com;
sandyshalaby@hotmail.com; plahaie@freeway.net; lahaiebe@hotmail.com;
lukeduke03@hotmail.com; bevans@email.lhs.org; hkennedy@cmdpdx.com;
kristine.danzer@kimptongroup.com; mbillet@webtrends.com; neecie66@aol.com
Subject: The number one song the day you were born is your theme song for
life and. . .

 .

The link below will tell you  what that song was!

Have fun!

 http://www.thisdayinmusic.com/cont/choose.html>


Kashka Kubzdela
5411 S. Blackstone Ave. 3
Chicago, IL 60615
kkubzdela@csc.cps.k12.il.us

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Kashka Kubzdela


Dear David,

I'm so glad you asked for an update!

We have indeed had an interesting development regarding the Electricity Bill
since your visit.  You will recall that in AMCHAM's briefing, it was
positively noted that the drafting process of the Electricity Bill had been
transparent and that a draft that would provide a blueprint for the
restructuring of the electricity sector to move toward competitive markets
was attained.  Noone was 100 percent satisfied (probably the mark of a good,
passable bill) but many  agreed to the draft and felt, while not perfect, it
would achieve the desired reform.

We have learned that there are actually two drafts of the Electricity Bill
sponsored by the Ministry of Power.  The first has been developed by NCAER
(NCAER draft) in a very transparent process with seven iterations and
comments from 190 parties.  NCAER was hired as a consultant for this purpose
by the Ministry of Power.  At the time of Draft III, a second draft (MoP
draft) was developed in the Ministry which subsequently incorporated some but
not all of the NCAER draft provisions negotiated in the transparent process.
It was the MoP draft that was sent to the Group of Ministers and has been
worked on by the Ministry of Law.

The draft, however, was never introduced in Parliament.  The industry
discovered the existence of the second MoP draft immediately prior to
Minister Kumaramangalam's hospitalization and lobbied him and Secretary Basu
heavily to introduce the NCAER draft in Parliament or, at a minimum, allow a
transparent commenting process on the MoP draft.

Several parties in the industry have now been given the MoP draft, and
Secretary Basu has said he would entertain comments.  (How widely it has been
distributed is unknown.)  In addition, the death of the Minister, who was a
staunch advocate of reform, and the lack of a named successor, has now left
things somewhat uncertain.

The issues as they now stand are:

The existence of two separate Ministry-sponsored drafts, only one of which
was subjected to a wide sector review process.
The need to use the product of a transparent, commenting process once it has
been formulated.
The fact that the fine-tuned balance of interests and clear blueprint for a
transition to competitive markets achieved by the NCAER draft has been lost
in the MoP draft.  For example, the clear deregulation of price provisions in
the tariff section have been removed so that there is, in the MoP draft, full
regulation of price by the state commissions; however, in the state
commission section, there is a provision that allows the State Commission to
permit access to a consumer class and only determine the wheeling charge
(rather than the wheeling and supply price) for that class when it has so
determined.   Thus, there is  an apparent conflict within the statute
regarding the regulation of commodity priceand uncertainty regarding access
to end users.  (There are many such examples.)

Action Item:  Either support the NCAER draft and send it to the Ministry of
Law for legal fine tuning (Basu mentioned that the "form" of the NCAER draft
was not right), or repeat the iterative, transparent commenting process with
regard to the MoP draft.  hWe recommend supporting the NCAER draft because it
reflects a balance of the multiple sector interests.  It is the first such
document produced through an open process in India and was a process
sponsored by the Ministry -- for that reason alone, the Ministry should
promote and support the NCAER version.

Any assistance you can render on this issue will be greatly appreciated by
many parties in the sector.  Let us know how it goes.

Sincerely,
Jane Wilson

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/09/2000 07:51 PM ---------------------------

"Pumphrey, David" <David.Pumphrey@hq.doe.gov> on 09/09/2000 03:36:09 AM
To: "'sanjay.bhatnagar@enron.com'" <sanjay.bhatnagar@enron.com>,
"'jane.wilson@enron.com'" <jane.wilson@enron.com>
cc: "Cutler, Thomas" <Thomas.Cutler@hq.doe.gov>

Subject: Electricity Bill Developments

Dear Sanjay and Jane,

I wanted to again thank you for the briefings you provided during my recent
visit to India.  Your analysis of developments in the electricity sector were
very helpful.

As you know we are getting ready for the visit of the Prime Minister next
week.  We have several energy events related to the visit and hope to be able
to complete some of the "homework" that you assigned.  It would be
particularly helpful if you could provide any updates on the status of the
Electricity bill.  I understand that the Council of Ministers had approved it
but I don't know if progress has been made in the Parliament.  Also there was
a report that some aspects of the bill had been changed in the approval
process.  Any updates would be useful for us in preparing for our meetings
with Secretary Basu and the Prime Minister.

Thanks for any help you can provide.

David Pumphrey
Department of Energy


How are you?  I havn't talked to you in a while...  since just before St.
Patty's day.  Did you survive?

Katie Trullinger
Wilshire Credit Corporation
REO Marketing Manager
800-776-0100 x7804


Hi Taffy,

Did the Pompano Beach meeting get scheduled?

Kay


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Matt,

Thanks for the heads-up on this issue.  I will confer with Janice and one of
us will get back to you.

Meanwhile, I think I may need further clarification about  what testing
methods were used by SGS at loadport and at discharge in Thailand and the
Phillipines.  My key area of concern is whether (as now appears unlikely from
your e-mail) SGS tested using both ASTM D3605 without ashing and ASTM D3605
with ashing at all the relevant points, and whether the test results were
consistent; e.g., whether the product was on-spec for both methods
immediately before loading, but off-spec for both methods at discharge in
Thailand and the Phillipines.  May I impose on you to provide one summary
chronology of the analysis done at loadport and both discharge ports, with
particular emphasis on (a) whether both testing methods (ASTM D3605 without
ashing and with ashing) were used, and the results, and (b) the results for
filterable dirt? (You have just sent something like this for the Thailand
cargo only, which I found very helpful).   Also, if SGS or anyone else has
made comment about the reliability or unreliability of the filterable dirt
analysis (or any other aspect of the testing done by SGS of this cargo),
please let me know about that as well.

I appreciate your good help.

    Britt

	Matthias Lee@ECT
	08/08/2000 06:39 AM

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: D3605

Dear Janice / Britt

I know that Janice has kindly agreed to return to the team to advise and
coordinate with Mike Brown's team and myself in regard to the D3605 issue,
whilst I am to look to Britt's guidance for the contamination on the Elang
cargo. My apologies therefore for mixing the issues for the puposes of this
e-mail.

The joint testing of samples of the Elang cargo is planned to take place end
next week. The joint testing would include metals as well as filterable dirt,
so we would need to decide, in quite short order, on the test method we want
to propose for metals for relevant parties to agree.

Although we believe the contamination would be dramatically demonstrated by
the level of filterable dirt, the metals clearly would also be an important
factor. As you may be aware, the loadport sample results which we are
presently relying on to say that the cargo was on spec when loaded, was
tested with "ashing" for metals. We would not be able to say whether another
loadport sample would test on spec for metals using straight D3605. If it
doesn't test on spec at the joint testing using straight D3605, the vessel
owners would surely argue that the cargo would have been rejected by First
Gas anyway, independent of the filterable dirt. Although such as argument may
not defeat our case entirely, it is very likely to impact on the quantum we
would be able to recover.

It seems that the preferred test method for metals at the joint testing would
therefore be "ashing" to avoid conflict with existing loadport sample
results. We still have SGS's support for that, but we need to convince Minton
Treharne who acts for the cargo underwriters as well as the Owners/P&I Club.
Still, just in case details of our dispute with Mitsubishi become known to
Firts Gas, we may wish to avoid proposing a test method for joint testing
that would be inconsistent with the one we ultimately present to First Gas,
which for obvious long term objectives ought to be the CORRECT test method
acceptable to parties whether D3605 or "ashing" or some other method. That
said, I think if we are able to go with "ashing" for the joint testing, it is
not likely to jeopardize our position with First Gas.

I note Janice's preference for US experts over European experts for the D3605
issue. Have we been able to get any US experts' view on the right test to use
(whether D3605 or "ashing")? Has Enron formed a view on the "correct" test
method? If we have been able to source a "friendly" US expert, we may want to
have his input for the contamination issue.

Your views and guidance would be most appreciated.

Thanks and regards
Matt

I also note Janice's preference to source for US experts to assist us on the
D3605 issue over European experts and was wondering whether we have been able
to for


Just wanted to let you know that I will be out of the office from Wednesday May 23rd returning on Tuesday June 5th.  Yuan Tian (x53579) will be running your books while I am gone.  Please let me know if you have any questions or would like for me to do something for you before I leave.

Go East Desk!

Sincerely,

Alejandra Ch?vez
Enron
Energy Operations
713-853-9185


-----Original Message-----
From:  Tribolet, Michael
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 1:23 PM
To: 'jwilson@saybrook.net'
Subject: Comments on MOU/SCE memo of April 20, 2001

As we discussed, here are my comments/questions on the presentation.

1. On page 17, in 2003-4, the DWR purchases $4.7B in power.  The MOU states
that SCE would be obligated for purchased power beginning in 2003.

2. On page 17, the debt service figure did not tie to the footnotes.   Using
both the $2.7B and $1.5B DWR note issuances, the annual debt service is
approximately $430 mln per year on a mortgage type amortization and about
$500 million per year on a straight-line amortization.  The table indicates
approximately $750 mln per year in debt service.   Was the $3B SCE issue's
debt service accidentally captured in these figures?

3. The SCE day one pre-tax sources appear to be :

 Bond issuance by SCE    $3,000   mln
 Payment by parent          $   400   mln (at least)
 Sale of transmission        $2,760   mln
 Total SCE inflows            $6,160   mln

 What is needed is the model that shows that the original 4.9 cents covers
cost of service and QF's, plus debt service,  after these inflows reduce the
current debt and past due vendors amounts.  We have no way to test the
sufficiency of these amount versus a pro-forma debt structure.

4. The MOU states that SCE shall securitize its full net undercollected
amount (approx. $3.5 billion), yet the presentation shows a $3B financing.
What is the difference?

5. We need the economic assumptions on the DWR power purchases (volume,
tenor, cost, etc.)

6. Is the total consumption figure listed prior to the 3% buydown or after
giving effect for it (pages 27 to 29)?

7. The transmission sale to the State of California's SPV does not appear to
finance itself at the current rates of return.  If the current pretax, pre
interest return is approximately 13%, the return after giving effect for the
2.3x purchase price is only about 5.5%.  This does not appear to be
sufficient to service the associated debt.

Regards,

Michael A. Tribolet


Please change deal nos. 497905 and 498198 to Los Angelese Department of Water
& Power.


SoCal Ed May Seek Temporary Return To Cost-Based Rates
By Jason Leopold

09/29/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- Southern California Edison may ask federal
regulators next week to allow the state's electricity market to temporarily
return to regulation until the market produces lower wholesale power rates, a
company executive told Dow Jones Newswires.
In addition, a filing expected before the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission by SoCal Edison, a unit of Edison International (EIX), will ask
for an immediate investigation into California's power market, different from
an investigation FERC is currently conducting here.
"This (investigation) would request a formal proceeding where federal
regulators would take testimony," said Bob Foster, senior vice president of
public affairs for SoCal Edison. "This would be a much more vigorous
proceeding" than the probe federal regulators are currently conducting into
California's power market.
"This market is not producing just and reasonable rates," Foster said. "It is
producing power prices that are two to three times higher than the rest of
the country ... the market is in dire need of a fix," Foster said.
Foster said the FERC filing is still a work in progress, but one of the
solutions the utility plans on including in the filing is no longer having
the market dictate the cost of wholesale power.
Instead, Foster said the utility favors a temporary return to regulation in
the form of cost-based rates, where the price of wholesale power is decided
by how much it costs for a generation unit to produce the electricity.
"That's the way they used to do it in the old days," Foster said, adding that
the utility will include a variety of solutions to FERC on how to repair the
state's wholesale power market. "It's a return to regulation, but going back
toward a cost-based system is viewed only as an interim measure."
Foster said if FERC does not take immediate action and the market continues
as is "they will have unbelievable amount of rebellion on their hands."
He said the utility is also deciding whether to ask FERC to impose price caps
on wholesale power or bid caps on other markets operated by the state's Power
Exchange.
         Utility Sinking Deeper Into Debt

Foster said SoCal Edison is being forced to borrow millions of dollars to
cover the difference between what it pays for wholesale power and what it
charges its customers during the rate freeze.
The company's stock has been taking a beating in recent weeks as Wall Street
learned about the utility's $2 billion debt.
Current wholesale power prices are about 20 cents/KWh, but the utility
charges its customers about 3 to 4 cents/KWh.
That could end if SoCal Edison convinces state regulators that it recovered
its stranded costs related to the sale of its power plants.
The utility's recent filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission
suggests that the pending sale of its hydro generating assets will allow it
to end the rate freeze and start charging its customers market-based rates.
But Foster said the company wants to protect its customers.
"We believe the rate freeze is going to end sooner or later and consumers
cannot be exposed to a volatile market," Foster said. "Our primary goal is to
protect consumers and provide them with affordable, reliable and predictable
rates."
Still, the utility is going to have to convince state regulators of its
intentions. Foster said the company will file with the Public Utilities
Commission soon, possibly to lift the rate freeze, based on the pending sale
of its hydro assets, and to raise its rates.
"We don't want to have California in a state of chaos," Foster said. "We hope
to have a cooperative agreement with state regulators when the time comes."
   -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com


pls print for me.  thanks. dF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/13/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

Dave Waymire
03/13/2000 10:44 AM
To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: TW Compressor Monetization

Attached is my analysis based on a sales price of $14.2MM and $14.8MM with a
buy back in the 7th year.  The loan structure for Hanover assumes that the
difference between the sales price and TW's buy back price would be amortized
over the contract term.  The remaining balance of the loan is assumed to be a
balloon payment at the end of the finance term.

I will put together some analysis on a 9 year term and forward this on to you
when it is completed.


Good afternoon John,

I just want to drop you a line to update you re: Andy Fastow.  I have
confirmed a one hour interview slot with Mr. Fastow in Monday, December 4th
from
11:00 a.m. - noon.  This is in addition to your schedule interviews with Mr.
Lay and Mr. Skilling - outline below.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at
713-853-5670.

Regards,

Cindy

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000 04:49 PM -----

	Cindy Derecskey
	10/31/2000 01:44 PM

		 To: "John Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu>
		 cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: Enron Case Study

Good afternoon John,

I hope things are well with you.  I am writing to update you on the status of
your meetings with Andy Fastow, Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling.  I have arranged
the following meeting dates and times with Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling, (I am
still trying to work with Andy Fastow's schedule):

Jeff Skilling
December 4th
2:00 - 3:00 p.m.

Ken Lay
December 4th
3:30 - 4:30 p.m.

Also, I will attempt to schedule the meeting with Andy Fastow for December
4th for convenience - this will also allow us to possibly schedule additional
meetings for the 5th (as needed).  I will let you know as soon as I'm
successful.

Regards,

Cindy Derecskey
University Affairs
Enron Corp.


Allyson,

You should receive some formation documents relating to Edgecombe
Development.  The name is not spelled correctly (missing an "e"), but that is
being corrected at this time.

 Bob spoke to me about wanting Enron to send a letter concerning the
financing arrangements for the project.  I would like for us to discuss this
as well.

Kay


Will, due to the changing circumstances, the West and Canada have traders using multiple books, multiple regions for phys and Fin. Can we work around this or make a change that would not be too complicated?

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:08 AM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	FW: quick question regarding EOL Adminstration

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Will
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:07 AM
To:	Chang, Fran; Luu, Duong
Subject:	RE: quick question regarding EOL Adminstration

Fran,

All deals from EOL are mapped to a desk in EnPower following these rules:

There cannot be more than one desk for any combination of
Trader
Region
Nature (Phys/Fin)

Therefore, you can have a trader with different books, so long as either the Region or Nature is different.

Let me know if you have any other questions.

Will

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 11:23 AM
To:	Smith, Will; Luu, Duong
Subject:	quick question regarding EOL Adminstration

Hi, Duong Luu and Will:

We are trying to add Tim Belden in EOL Adminstration (under Enpower) to be the Trader of "NETCO Long Term Southwest" after I have added him as the trader for "NETCO Long Term California",  but I kept getting below error message:

ORA-00001: unique constraint (PWR.PK_DEAL_DEFAULT_DESKS) violated

Is this because we cannot have any individual to be the trader of more than one west book?

Please advise.

Thanks,

Fran


What about DIS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Shine, David" <david.shine@ubspw.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 2:36 PM
To:	Kevin Presto (ENE) (E-mail); Kevin Presto (ENE) Home Email (E-mail)
Subject:	EOG Executions

Sold 5,000 @ 33.03

David L. Shine
Vice President-Investments
UBS PaineWebber
1111 Bagby, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 654-0396  Direct
(800) 553-3119  Toll Free
(713) 654-4723  Fax


>
> Edwin Edwards writes home from the Federal Pen
>
> Dear Candy,
> I miss you so much. It's terrible that you can only visit twice a year.
> Please don't worry about me, though. It's boring here, but not too bad.
> The golf, tennis and fishing seem to make the days pass fairly quickly.
> My cell isn't quite as large as I hoped for... one bath and a small
balcony.
> I'm sending a picture with the guards. They are very kind and
> under-standing.
> Love,
>
> Eddie
>

 - EDWARDS.JPG


Keith,

Here are the changes recommended by my legal group.  Let me know if you have
any comments.
Thanks,

Kevin
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000
04:34 PM ---------------------------

Dan J Hyvl
11/09/2000 03:02 PM
To: Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Comments concerning Line Pack Gas Purchase Agreement form provided
by Vector.

Kevin,
 As we discussed, here are the changes I feel need to be made to the form
before Enron North America Corp.  can agree to use it.

1.  Change 1.1 to read as follows:  This Agreement shall be effective upon
its execution and shall continue in full force and effect through December
31, 2000.

2.  Change 3.1 to read as follows:  Upon not less than 36 hours advance
notification by Vector, Seller shall be obligated to sell and deliver to
Vector, and Vector shall be obligated to purchase and receive from Seller, at
the time stipulated by Vector in the advance written notification, at a Point
of Sale, a quantity of gas equal to Seller's PSQ for such Point of Sale, as
specified in Exhibit A to this Agreement.  The parties agree that time is of
the essence in this Agreement..

3.  Add 4.2 to read as follows:  4.2  If Vector fails to purchase and receive
from Seller the quantity of gas required to be purchased and received by it
under Article 3.1 for any reason other than the occurrence of an event of
Force Majeure, Vector shall indemnify Seller and shall be liable to pay
Seller an amount equal to the difference between the price that would have
been paid to Seller and the Gas Daily low price, set forth in Gas Daily under
the heading "Daily Price Survey" under the listing applicable to Chicago and
using the low price in the range of prices published for the day that Vector
failed to perform multiplied by the volume Vector failed to purchase and
receive from Seller for such day.

4.  Add the following language at the end of 9.1.  For breach of any
provision for which an express remedy or measure of damages is herein
provided, such express remedy or measure of damages shall be the sole and
exclusive remedy hereunder.  If no remedy or measure of damages is expressly
herein provided, the obligor's liability shall be limited to direct actual
damages only, such direct actual damages shall be the sole and exclusive
remedy hereunder and all other remedies or damages at law or in equity are
waived.  Unless expressly herein provided, neither party shall be liable for
consequential, incidental, punitive, exemplary or indirect damages, lost
profits or other business interruption damages, in tort, contract, under any
indemnity provision or otherwise.

5.  Add the following Seller's information in 10.1.
 Enron North America Corp.
 P. O. Box 4428
 Houston, Texas 77210-4428
 Attn:  Documentation and Deal Clearing Desk
 Facsimile No. (713) 646-4816.


Sorry you weren't able to join my hunting boondoggle in SoDak!  It was epic.
Lots of birds (the wild variety, not pen raised and tied down like at
Pheasant Haven!)  We saw literally 1500-2000 birds over three days of
hunting, and limited out every day.  Got my first double--two shots, two
birds, nothun' but net.  You gonna be at the mgt conf?  I'd love to get
caught up with you and share some new tales of woe from the pipeline
group.    PS, I met Angie Green yesterday--very sharp young lady.  She said
to say hi to you and Nicole.  Adios.  DF


Please see the attached Management Report for September 25, 2000:

 Total  Today Year To Date Life To Date

Number of Transactions  2,834 313,257 318,258
Gross Notional Value $  1,933,795,324 158,306,362,887 159,519,604,791

Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)  11,348,068,665 11,443,820,157

New Counterparties transacting today  2
Counterparties having transacted to date      490

Also attached is the Public Domain Report, containing information which is
intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron:

Total Life to Date Transactions   > 318,000, which is > 59% of Enron,s
current transactions for the month
Average Daily Transactions    > 2,100
Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $159 billion
Average Daily Notional Value    = Approximately $1 billion, which is 45.5% of
Enron,s Notional Volume
Number of Products Offered Each Day  = Approximately 1,000


Talked to Craver's office. His office is going to get back to me about meeting at Edison early next week.  That work for you?

Best,
Jeff


I think this is an excellent letter.  I agree with Sue's comments and have
included her changes on Page 3.  All changes have been marked in this version.


barkerde@nmenergy.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

After reading Pete's update on MIS changes that will go into effect May 29,  I
have tried the phone route with the NYISO and haven't found a live person to
answer a question I have regarding the $20,000 day ahead adder. The removal of
the $20,000 adder was supposed to be in conjunction with the proposal passed
by
BIC and MC back in Sept, where the external proxy busses would clear at BME
instead of LBMP. Subsquently it was determined that due to soft ware
limitations
and the study that long term prices indicated that the BME clearing prices
would
have big uplift impact since BME averaged higher then the LBMP. The answer was
to automate ECA06B so that when there was congestion that only the proxy bus
effected would clear at BME, in effect eliminating the need for the $20,000
adder. Soooo the question is: Is the automated ECA06B going to be in place May
29?
Another thought along these lines...Will the removal of the $20,000 adder to
non constrained proxy busses pose a problem for those who don't want their DAM
schedules bumped by HAM schedules? Will simply babysitting your schedules by
changing the HAM bids be sufficent?
Since I'm on a roll, what about the fact that according to Tech Bull. 61 that
IS+ is still changing Export Sink Price Caps to a -$100 Dec Bid in spite of
the
fact that BIC and MC back in Sept passed a motion to change this so that the
Dec
bid would be equal in magnitude but opposite in sign from the SPC Bid? Which
is
wrong, Tech Bull 61, IS+ or me? Please only pick one, and it must pertain to
this narrow question.


Hi Kathleen,

I will try to take this one it.  There is a charge for it (I think) that the
department picks up.

By the way, have you been invited to the ENA law conference at the
Woodlands?  We need to get you in on that one.

Talk to you soon.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/10/2000 09:31
PM ---------------------------
From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 09/08/2000 06:52 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: ENA Orientation---Why don't you and Kathleen plan on attending
this.  I don't think you've been to this yet?

----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 06:52 PM -----

	Ernie@ENRON
	Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
	09/08/2000 06:41 PM

		 To: HoustonENA
		 cc:
		 Subject: ENA Orientation

	Ernie

Need to buff up on your Enron North America knowledge?

Join us
 October 4
8:30 to 12:30
in EB 552

ENA Orientation will provide a brief but conscience overview of the
business.  Learn how a deal flows through the departments, areas of
contribution, and their impact on ENA's business.  Key players include:

Dave Delainey- President and COO, ENA
Trading
Origination
Structuring
Business Analysis and Reporting

Don't hesitate in signing up as space is limited and you won't want to miss
out.  For enrollment click here ( ) to go directly to the Development Center
or call (713)853-0357.


Hello-
Please note that I have a new email  address:
alamonsoff@riskwaters.com
?
Also, if you have not already submitted a copy  of your presentation for the
Financial Mathematics training course, please let  me know the status ASAP
and if you are planning either to bring copies with you  to the course or if
you will be submitting a copy to me. If you plan on bringing  copies, please
note to bring 40 copies.
?
?
Regards,
Amy Lamonsoff
Training Course  Coordinator


Who is handling the amendment?


O.K. like I said earlier, update me on what the guys think!

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001
03:41 PM ---------------------------

"PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on 04/17/2001
03:25:00 PM
To: Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Commission

That is not the case. I know what Mark and Tom trade, I apologize if I
misspoke. All daily trades, as well as hourly trades will now be a flat fee
charge of $15 per trade. This covers any size transaction.

----- Original Message -----
From: Evelyn Metoyer  <Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com>
At:  4/17 16:20

>
> Tom and Mark are not spot traders, they're cash traders. The Real Time guys
> are now being charged $15 for trades - but cash and term traders should
> still be charged the traditional $.005.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on
> 04/17/2001 02:28:57 PM
>
> To:   Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Commission
>
>
> Evelyn, as of April 16, 2001 our charge for Spot trades is a flat fee of
> $15/trade.


Here are you positions.  Have a good evening.

Robin


Virendra,

Please check the set up of the book listed below.  I am having to manually
override that post-id everyday.

Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you.

BOOKID  6/23/00 POSTID

INTRA-MKT3-PRC 818797

Thanks,
Robin


Looks like I'm gonna try BIAXIN XL 500 mg tablets.

Are you really cute today?


Please include me on this trip.  Have Ina reserve a plane flight for us if
you don't mind.

Thanks,
Mike


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/17/2000 08:26
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           11/16/2000 06:01 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: LM6000 Contract Payment Allocations

E voila!

Kay Mann@ENRON
11/16/2000 02:47 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LM6000 Contract Payment Allocations

Ben,

Has the payment allocation chart been updated, and if so, could I get a copy?

Thanks,

Kay


No problem.  I appreciate the help in trying to keep track of it.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
09:15 AM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@btu.net> on 11/17/2000 06:23:56 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg112000.pdf


I took all of your good suggestions and incorporated them.  I also reordered
a few of the paragraphs and trimmed some of the language.  Look at it again
and see if we've got a pretty good work product.  Thanks!!!

Susan Scott
11/21/2000 11:13 AM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Caithness proposal


I spoke with Gavin Gaul just now about the GA drawings for the 99 peakers.
He said that he would have to do some poking around, because those drawings
would have been archived a year ago.  But he thought he could get me the
as-built site layout drawings for the plants.  The version of the Brownsville
layout from the CD-ROM is not as-built, so maybe we should hold off on the
layouts until we get the as-builts from Gavin.  I'll let you know as soon as
I hear back from him.


Attached please find my revisions to the power financial swap product.
Please review and let me know if you have any questions or comments.  A
number of the changes I made are necessary to ensure that the product
components for the swap are compatible with the physical index product
components, e.g, the description of the index.

Regards,

Leslie

	Dale Neuner
	06/02/2000 01:47 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: US East Power Financial Swap - ISO NE HE 11-23

Eric, please get the attached in front of John Suarez and have him offer
comments/approval. In particular, ensure that

(i) the Product descritpion for the website is adequate (keep in mind I only
have 15 characters to work with)
(ii) the reference to the index is correct
(iii) the product will be priced on each day during the week, including NERC
holidays.

Leslie and Mark; once I get comments from commercial I'd like to have each of
you offer review and offer comments on this Product - final approval to come
from Mark.

Dale
3-9746


All purchases are from COH or CPA

Dates  Supply deal Market Deal
26th & 27th 156378  156379 sale to EES
27th  155240  155244  sale to EES
27th  155238  155237 sale to CES
26th & 27th 156465  156477  sale to AllEnergy
26th & 27th 156486  156489 sale to EES
27th  156494  156495  sale to EES
26th  156440  156505  sale to EES

I'm sure I made a few mistakes.


Julia:  I will review.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 01:55 PM -----

	Mark Taylor
	09/11/2000 09:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

Is this something you are working on?
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 09:55 AM -----

	Julia H Chin@ENRON
	09/11/2000 08:16 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

hi mark -- this is a currency swap agreement for the pending condor follow-on
offering.  could you have some one from your group take a look of this
agreement?  we are printing the preliminary offering memo this friday and the
deal closes toward the end of this month.

thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Julia H Chin/NA/Enron on 09/11/2000 08:09
AM ---------------------------

JGallup@milbank.com on 09/09/2000 01:21:13 AM
To: barry.schnapper@enron.com, dan.boyle@enron.com,
trevor.randolph@enron.com, brian.steinbrueck@enron.com,
julia.h.chin@enron.com, gina.karathanos@enron.com, annmarie.tiller@enron.com,
Brent.Vasconcellos@enron.com, clint.walden@enron.com, ryan.siurek@enron.com,
lnath@dlj.com, dscott@dlj.com, dcapolon@dlj.com, lmallett@dlj.com,
mbdavis@dlj.com, dhemsey@dlj.com, cwebb@dlj.com, mprotz@dlj.com,
mcho@dlj.com, paul.f.cambridge@db.com, mike.jakubik@db.com,
craig.orchant@db.com, george.tyson@db.com, ross.newman@db.com,
maia.babbs@db.com, ute.muenstermann@db.com, peter.zabel@db.com,
joseph.kopec@db.com, mspradling@velaw.com, rastin@velaw.com,
eosterberg@velaw.com, tchandler@velaw.com, crankin@velaw.com,
pwarman@velaw.com, silversteina@sewkis.com, sbaratta@sewkis.com,
aroberts@wilmingtontrust.com, jlawler@wilmingtontrust.com,
gmitchell@ustrust.com, lyoung@ustrust.com, mazie@rlf.com,
tom.mazza@deweyballantine.com, joan.wheatley@deweyballantine.com,
hershel.wein@deweyballantine.com, robert.frastai@deweyballantine.com
cc: TDavis@milbank.com, BKayle@milbank.com, JGallup@milbank.com,
AWalker@milbank.com, ELim@milbank.com, SRenas@milbank.com,
KRiester@milbank.com

Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

Attached, please find a draft of the Enron Agreement for the Osprey II
transaction.? Please be advised that this draft is simultaneously being
distributed to our clients and therefore, remains subject to their review and
comments.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Best regards,

Joy K. Gallup

 <<Enron Agreement.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - Enron Agreement.doc


Is today Paige's birthday or tomorrow.  Of course if it was great news, then
it could be a celebratory drink.  I told Ric I may come by for a drink, but I
didn't know yet.  I think I'll call and get exact directions.

Do you need this fax I got from King and Spalding with comments on Midway?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 02:43 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: David Marshall

No news today.  I don't want to know today, as I'm drinking champagne and
ignoring the issue,


Donnie,

Thank you for meeting with us last week.  The information you provided was
very useful.  We have the following additional questions regarding the
correlation of power curves and the related controls surrounding changes to
curve correlation factors:

   How are correlation factors calculated?  Do the correlations typically
   change?  How often and how are they reviewed for accuracy?
   Do the factors change for delivery month (i.e., are they different in
   the short-term versus longer terms)?
   What approvals exist for changes to correlation factors by traders, if
   applicable?
   Do system controls exist to limit or prohibit changes to correlation
   factors?
   What other controls are in place to monitor or prohibit changes in
   correlation factors?
   What are the applicable correlations between the curves you provided?
   (If the correlations are difficult to provide, please let me know)

I am assuming that you would be the appropriate contact for these questions
since Stacey had referred us to you previously for overall curve
correlations.  However, if you are not the correct contact, please feel
free to call me at x56953 or e-mail me with the appropriate contact name.

Thank you for your assistance,

Jennifer
*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


Attached for your approval is the form of Enron Corp. Guaranty in favor of
the referenced Counterparty, which guarantees the obligations of ENA under a
financial confirmation.  We will need the standard executed copy.  The
confirmation requires that we deliver the Guaranty within 5 days.

 Upon approval and execution, please call me at x33399 to pick up the
documents.  Thank you for your assistance in this matter.


Please generate master for my review.  Thank you.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 03:28 PM -----

	Jason R Williams@ENRON
	11/21/2000 01:11 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Master Physical for UGI Utilities

Dan & Debra -

Attached is a credit worksheet for a Master Firm Purchase/Sale for UGI
Utilities.  Please prepare a draft and send to Claire Neri at UGI at your
earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Jay Williams


Attached is the template referenced in Rick Causey's memo.  If you have any questions please call Mike Deville (5-7852) or Greg Adams (3-3887)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Deville, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 6:03 PM
To:	Colwell, Wes; Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy; Myers, Thomas; Castleman, Kent; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Selzer, Howard; Lindsey, Mark E.; Beck, Sally; Stubblefield, Wade; Gunther, Dave; West, Terry
Cc:	Adams, Gregory; Brown, Rob; Butts, Bob
Subject:	DIP Financing and other Cash Flows

Attached is the spreadsheet we talked about on the phone. The numbers in the sheet represent what was shown to the DIP lenders last
weekend in order to obtain  financing. In many cases all revenues and other items were completely eliminated leaving only operating expense and
capital expenditures. We were trying to be as conservative as possible but also show a viable entity going forward. I hope we were not to far off.

What we would like you to do is populate this format with the numbers you believe to be true going forward based on the recent changes. We also need a detailed
explanation of what is in the numbers. A few things to remember are:

	This estimate should contain no allocations except for what you believe you salaries and wages would be post reduction (normally paid by Corp)

	Operating expenses includes salaries, outside services, benefits, employee expenses and any other items normally in operating expenses including
		non employee expenses and taxes other than income taxes.  Please provide as much detail as possible.  There is space for detailed opex at 		the bottom of the page.Call me if you have questions.

	Although in Chapter 11 interest and income taxes are not paid, please provide these to the extent your business unit pays them. We will adjust for
		entities that are in the filing.

	I understand there is a big global effort to identify assets for sale but please provide your best estimate to date along with the detail and we will 		compare to the global effort.

	Capex and investing should be mandatory only. Please provide detail back up.

	To the extent your business has any financing activities please provide. again we will adjust for filing entities.

	We need this as soon as possible but no later than Friday morning 9:00 am.

This should be a realistic view of your business unit as run under Chapter 11. We are only focused on CASH items now. Please provide backup detail for any
item you think needs it or is not self evident. Please do not hesitate to call myself 57852 or Greg Adams 33887 with questions.

Shortly this format will be expanded to weekly for Dec'01 and 13 weeks of 2002 with monthly through the remainder of 2002. This is the attachment
that was suppose to be attached to the email from Rick Causey. Below is a list of the CAO' s / Leads and what entities they are responsible for.

	Wes Colwell - ENA, NetCo, EBS, EPI and EEOS
	Rod Hayslett - ETS (without Northern), Northern, Clean Fuels, PGE and EREC
	Tom Myers - EGM
	Kent Castleman - EIM
	Jeff Sommers - EGAS (without Elektro), Elektro and any other self funding consolidated entity. Call me.
	Howard Selzer - EGEP India
	Mark Lindsey - EGF and Corp
	Sally Beck - ENW
	Wade Stubblefield - EES (Includes EES wholesale)

Thank you for your help.


Vince & Stinson,

For your information,  Professor Duffie assigned Taiichi, his Ph.D. student
to work on the audit back in May.
I will contact with him about the progress.

Zimin

---------------------- Forwarded by Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000 10:50 AM
---------------------------

hoshino@leland.Stanford.EDU on 05/25/2000 09:14:52 PM
Please respond to hoshino@leland.Stanford.EDU
To: Zimin.Lu@enron.com
cc:
Subject: It worked!

Dear Zimin,

 It was nice talking to you on the phone today
and thank you for the tip. I manually created "c:\Temp"
and that was it. The spreadsheet works now. With Pentium
200Mhz and 80M memory, it runs within 5 minutes.

Very best regards,

/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~

Taiichi Hoshino

Ph.D.candidate
EES&OR
Stanford University

The Shadows APT#171
750 North Shoreline Blvd.
Mountain View CA94043
Home TEL/FAX)650-960-1993

/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~/~


I'm afraid its true its true.  Thanks for the laugh!  on a more serious note fyi these meters are supposed to be tested
every 5 yrs. and they have never been tested or cleaned.  That scares me a bit.  Things just might not go back to-
gether like it came aprart, but we shall seeeeeeeeee.....

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Beverly
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 3:55 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	RE: Outage

No way...Geesh!!!!!!!!
Ha-Ha,
Bev

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 3:37 PM
To:	DL-ETS Gas Controllers; Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; Kowalke, Terry; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Chris L; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda
Subject:	Outage

Please see the attached.

 << File: SJmetertube101901.doc >>


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Meet w/Chris Greaney

Date:		2/21/2001
Time:		2:30 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


November 21, 2000

This week's Click 'n Save Email Update is a
reminder of the great $99/$109 or less each way
Coast-to-Coast southwest.com Only Specials

Your Invitation to e-Freedom still stands.
Gobble It Up!

********* southwest.com e-Freedom Sale *********

Who: southwest.com Customers.

What: Internet Specials for $99/$109 or less each way.

Where: All cities with scheduled Southwest Airlines
 service.

When: 7-day advance purchase beginning
 at 7:00 AM CST on November 17, 2000 through
 December 1, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
 Travel beginning November 28, 2000 through
 March 30, 2001.

Why: To give you the Freedom to move about the country.

How: Go to http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

************************************************

Here are the details of the southwest.com Internet Special:
*Tuesday, Wednesday, and Saturday $99 or less each
way Internet Specials are available only on southwest.com
and may be combined with any other fare type.

*Monday, Thursday, Friday, and Sunday $109 or less each
way Internet Specials are available only on southwest.com
and may be combined with any other fare type.

All with the following restrictions:

*7-day advance purchase
*Travel November 28, 2000 through March 30, 2001.
 Florida markets will be blacked out March 15-30, 2001.
*Purchase beginning November 17 through
 December 1, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
*southwest.com Internet Specials are available one-way or
 may be combined with any other fare.
 When combining with another fare, the
 most restrictive fare rules apply.
*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of up to $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip.

southwest.com Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. *Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

Seats are limited and won't be available on some
flights that operate during very busy travel times
and holiday periods.

Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
full unrestricted fare.

*************** SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION ******************
Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Southwest Airlines e-mail updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

*********************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers1 as: [sscott5@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers1-99587671F@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


FYI.  These are the items I left Ken a voicemail about.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 12/15/99 05:29
PM ---------------------------

Carolyn Cooney@ENRON
12/15/99 12:11 PM

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Governor Ridge might call Ken Lay today

I just received a call from Bob O'Dell (215-569-5312) following up on the
request from Mayor Edward Rendell regarding the upcoming Millennium
Philadelphia's Light and Laser Show and Philadelphia 2000.  The Mayor has
asked Enron for a $750,000 commitment.  As outlined in my December 6th memo
-- the breakdown of the commitment was for Enron to contribute $500,000 for
the Millennium Philadelphia's Light and Laser Show on December 31, 1999.  The
$250,000 would be credited to Philadelphia 2000 Convention package.  The
Mayor and Mr. Lay have spoken several weeks ago but no commitment was made at
the time.  Will we be sponsoring the event?

Also, Bob gave us the heads up --- that Governor Tom Ridge (R-PA) will be
calling Ken Lay this afternoon to ask Mr. Lay to be the chair/co-chair of the
Republican Governors Association dinner that will be held in Washington, DC
in February 2000.

Please let me know if you need additional information.

Thank you.


Kathy,

	You helped me on this before.  Plaintiffs are now pressing for a deposition on December 5 of a Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative of TW in this matter in Houston at Susman, Godfrey's office.  You have already sent to me a list of contracts that might be relevant.

	Bill Rapp got a telefax just recently on this from a Wes Hahn, who is apparently acting as a consultant/expert in this case for defendants.  Hahn has suggested that he appear as TW's corporate rep in this matter.  Hahn advises that he was an officer of TW and Enron "at the time that this contract was in force and when it was terminated."  I guess he means the processing contract between plaintiffs and Chevron that was terminated around 1996 when Chevron sold the Leedey plant to Dynegy.

	Let's talk tomorrow about how many contracts we have, how long they might take to review for privileges, etc., who would be the right corporate representative for TW, and so forth.  If you can think of anyone else who should be involved, please let me know.

	Given that Becky Zikes has actually worked for TW some years ago as a contract administrator, I'm going to ask her to attend our conference, as well as Barbara O'Banion, who just recently joined the Unit as a contract legal assistant.

	I look forward to speaking with you tomorrow.

	Britt

	P.S.:  Dari, I included you because a processing plant was involved and thought you might be interested.  Do you want to be kept in the loop?


<http://www.expedia.com/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>
 	 home <http://www.expedia.com/daily/home/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>flights <http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=fltw&rfrr=-1412>hotels <http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=htin&rfrr=-1412>cars <http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=spec&flag=f&rfrr=-1412>packages <http://www.expedia.com/daily/packages/default.asp?rfrr=-1412> cruises <http://www.expedia.com/daily/cruise/default.asp?page=start&rfrr=-1412>deals <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>guides <http://www.expedia.com/daily/guides/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>maps <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=Maps&rfrr=-1412>business <http://www.expedia.com/daily/business/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>
 	 Site Map <http://www.expedia.com/daily/sitetour/default.asp> |  	 My Trips <http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=litn> |  	 My Profile <http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=info> |  	 Customer Support <http://www.expedia.com/daily/service/>

  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/siderule.gif>

IN THIS ISSUE

 	   <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>	 	 Flight deals

 	   <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>	 	 Vacation package deals

 	   <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>	 	 Lodging deals

 	   <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>	 	 Cruise deals
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/spaceit.gif>
 	 <http://ads.expedia.com/click.ng/TPID=1&LOCATION=EMAILTR&PLACEMENT=EMAILACOL>

  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>
Dear Cara,

Just think about it ... bright sun shining down on your skin; clear, blue water as far as your eyes can see; and your toes digging into warm, sugary white sand. It's Mexico -- and we can get you there at savings of up to 35%. Cancun, Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta, and Playa del Carmen are on sale from $448 <http://www.expedia.com/daily/promos/packages/mexico_promo/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>, along with other favorite Mexican hideaways. Don't miss out -- book by February 28 and save up to 35% on your ultimate Mexican vacation <http://www.expedia.com/daily/promos/packages/mexico_promo/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>!
	  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/spaceit.gif>	 <http://www.expedia.com/daily/promos/packages/mexico_promo/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>

SEARCH FOR A FLIGHT

Leaving from:	Depart: (MM/DD/YY)
 	 	 Morning  Afternoon  Evening  	 1 adult  2 adults  3 adults  4 adults  5 adults  6 adults
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/spaceit.gif>
Going to:	Return: (MM/DD/YY)
 	 	 Morning  Afternoon  Evening

EXPEDIA'S TOP TRAVEL DEALS

  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/msn/images/icon_Air.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Flight Deals
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	British Airways fare sale! Fly to London from $198. Book by 1/31 <http://www.expedia.com/daily/advert/BA_3GreatCities/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	New! Save big with US Airways Web fares <http://www.expedia.com/daily/promos/USAirwaysWebFares/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Save up to 60% on your flight, with Expedia Bargain Fares <http://www.expedia.com/daily/promos/BargainFares/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	See more great fares on our Flight Deals page <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/flights/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>

  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/msn/images/icon_hotel.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Lodging Deals
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	New York hotels from $65 -- Great rates at the Hilton, the Hyatt, and more! <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/hotel/NYC.asp?rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Washington, D.C.'s four-star Melrose Hotel from $119 in February <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=HotDetails&HotelID=22903&numadult=1&merchtext=Special+Deal!+Enjoy+rates+from+$119+per+night+for+stays+between+February+1+and+February+28.+Book+today+and+save!&rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	San Diego -- Sheraton Hotel and Marina from $129 until March 31 <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=HotDetails&HotelID=11109&numadult=1&merchtext=Special+Deal!+Enjoy+rates+from+$129+per+night+for+stays+between+now+and+March+31.+Book+today+and+save!&rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	See our Hot Lodging Deals: 40 destinations, over 100 great deals <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/hoteldeals.asp?rfrr=-1412>

  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/msn/images/icon_package.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Vacation Package Deals
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Unique Orlando family deal -- Three nights in a roomy vacation home, from $364 <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=PKGDEALDETAILS&DispSection=6&DestId=178294&rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Add NBA tickets to your Orlando vacation -- The Magic vs. the Bulls or the Knicks! <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/packages/seasonal/orlando_basketball.asp?rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>		Acapulco -- Four-night, four-star air/hotel vacation from $711. Your own private beach! <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=PKGDEALDETAILS&DispSection=2&DestId=179991&rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Four-star Aruba deal -- Air and four nights' hotel from $838 <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=PKGDEALDETAILS&DispSection=8&DestId=601713&rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Weekday ski deal in Lake Tahoe -- Air, three nights at a four-star hotel from $332 <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/packages/ski/northlaketahoe.asp?rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	See our best vacation package deals <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/packages.asp?rfrr=-1412>

  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/deals/msn/images/icon_cruise.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Cruise deals
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Four-day western Caribbean cruise (Fort Lauderdale) from $449. <http://cruises.expedia.com/cruises/show_cruise.asp?d=2/1/2002&d2=8/31/2002&i=742545&c=44&v=221&pex=533&rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Seven-day eastern Caribbean cruise (Fort Lauderdale roundtrip) from $799 <http://cruises.expedia.com/cruises/show_cruise.asp?d=2/1/2002&d2=9/1/2002&i=749229&c=11&v=51&pex=534&rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/gold bullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	11-day Hawaiian Islands cruise from $1,049. See Oahu, Kauai, Maui, and Hawaii <http://cruises.expedia.com/cruises/show_cruise.asp?d=&i=832966&c=44&v=219&pex=535&rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	See our special discounted cruise deals <http://cruises.expedia.com/promotion/lmcruisespecials.html?rfrr=-1412>

EXPLORE EXPEDIA

  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Slide Shows -- Experience the color and spice of three favorite Mexican destinations
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Puerto Vallarta -- A sophisticated town with famed beaches and a vibrant arts scene <http://www.expedia.com/daily/slideshow/puertovallarta/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Canc?n -- Dive the Great Mayan Reef, trek to Mayan ruins, or taste-test tequilas! <http://www.expedia.com/daily/slideshow/Cancun/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/goldbullet.gif>	  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>	Los Cabos -- There's so much to do! Golf, kayak, laze on the beach, or hit the town <http://www.expedia.com/daily/slideshow/CaboSanLucas/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>

FROM OUR SPONSORS

  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>
<http://ads.expedia.com/click.ng/TPID=1&LOCATION=EMAILTR&PLACEMENT=EMAILBODY>
  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>

  <http://www.expedia.com/eta/spaceit.gif>

  <http://expedia.com/daily/faretracker/images/gold_rule3.gif>
UNSUBSCRIBE
If you do not wish to receive any further promotional e-mails from us, please click here <http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=info&rfrr=-1412>. Or simply reply to this mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

CONTACT US
If you'd like to give us feedback, please click here <https://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=fbak&rfrr=-1412>. For additional assistance, visit the Expedia.com Customer Support Center <http://www.expedia.com/daily/service/default.asp?rfrr=-1412>.

Prices are subject to availability and subject to change without notice. Prices shown may not include applicable taxes, fees and fuel surcharges.

Photo: PhotoDisc

?2002 Expedia, Inc. All rights reserved.

  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/spaceit.gif>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/spaceit.gif>
  <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/spaceit.gif>

This mail was sent to: Cara.Semperger@ENRON.COM
Message-Id: <20020131214619.A588.233655-57@customermail.expedia.com>


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


My contact at TXU was unavailable, I left him a message and hope to hear from him before I need to leave.  In case you need to talk to him, here is his info...

Jeff Smiron
214-875-5185

Here is also the spreadsheet.  Let me know if you need anything additional.


Adam Wenner prepared the attached chart laying out the various mitigation
options.  As you can see from the chart, some of the mitigation measures are
much more complicated than others.  FERC appears to have concerns with the
more complicated mitigation measures, but the more complicated measures also
cost little or nothing to implement.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Sarah
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 08/04/2000
04:41 PM ---------------------------

"Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com> on 08/04/2000 03:27:50 PM
To: "'Novosel, Sarah'" <snovose@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Portland General/Sierra Pacific Resources Merger - Mitigatio n
Measures

Sarah -- attached is the chart of current and proposed mitigation measures.
I think it would be useful to distribute this prior to our call on Monday,
so that the group could be thinking along those lines sooner rather than
later.

>  <<97915_1.doc>>

 - 97915_1.doc


Thank you. I enjoyed our discussion very much.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


http://www.dovewinds.com/dubya/

Copy and paste!


Vince:
Here are the files for pricing the deal without and with Credit Risk:

1) Without Credit Risk:

2) With Credit Risk: (two factor model)

Talk to you tomorrow 1:00 PM.
Thanks.
Paulo Issler


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041015.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:  24.00 / Final:  23.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


What did you get worked out?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:29 PM
To:	Parks, Joe; Boyt, Eric
Cc:	Concannon, Ruth; McMichael Jr., Ed; Pollan, Sylvia S.; Garza, Maria
Subject:	Florida swing supplier

Update:  ENA was buying daily swing gas from Sequent on Florida to supply the City of Tallahassee deal.  Sequent says this deal is an administrative burden and has elected not to supply any more gas to ENA after 2/1/2002.  Scott Goodell called Aaron Bohall with PanCanadian to see if they would become our new swing supplier.  Aaron told me that they would sell us gas under the following conditions,
	the deal has to be on PanCanadian's paper
	we need to let PanCanadian know by 8:00 AM every morning
	and ENA must take the same daily volumes over weekends and holidays.

This is a problem because Tallahassee does not have to take the same daily volumes over weekends and holidays and Tallahassee does not need to notify ENA until 9:00 AM.  Aaron will see if they can work with a 9:00 AM deadline.


Attached please find the Natural Gas market  analysis for today.

Thanks,

Bob McKinney
 - 6-4-01 Nat Gas.doc


glad we're not a generator.

best,
jeff

	Dorothy Rothrock <drothrock@cmta.net>
	07/11/2001 12:45 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Sher Shops Alternative Edison Bailout Plan

worse for SCE and generators, who have to eat the small guy share of the
undercollection
between them. No transmission sale.

D

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> better or worse than ours?
>
>
>                     Dorothy
>                     Rothrock             To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>                     <drothrock@cm        cc:
>                     ta.net>              Subject:     Re: Sher Shops
Alternative Edison
>                                          Bailout Plan
>                     07/11/2001
>                     12:20 PM
>
>
>
> let me know if delaney doesn't send to you...
>
> d
>
> Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Thanks.  415.782.7854.  Better or worse than ours?
> >
> >
> >                     Dorothy
> >                     Rothrock             To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> >                     <drothrock@cm        cc:     Ann.Cohn@sce.com,
> "'Barbara Barkovich
> >                     ta.net>              (E-mail)'"
> <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "Dominic
> >                                          DiMare (E-mail)"
> <dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>,
> >                     07/11/2001           "'John Fielder (E-mail)'"
> <fieldejr@sce.com>,
> >                     11:54 AM             "'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'"
> <isenberg@hmot.com>,
> >                                          "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
> <jdasovic@enron.com>,
> >                                          "'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'"
> <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
> >                                          "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'"
> <lys@a-klaw.com>,
> >                                          "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'"
> <lysherif@yahoo.com>,
> >                                          "'Gary Schoonyan (E-mail)'"
> <schoongl@sce.com>,
> >                                          "'John White (E-mail)'"
> <vjw@cleanpower.org>,
> >                                          dhunter@s-k-w.com,
> Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov
> >                                          Subject:     Re: Sher Shops
> Alternative Edison
> >                                          Bailout Plan
> >
> >
> > I have the plan.....who wants it? send your fax number (and $10 for
> > shipping
> > and handling....just kidding)
> >
> > D
> >
> > Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > > Folks:  Please see highlighted sections.  Anyone seen Byron's plan?
> Know
> > > where it's headed, etc.?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> *************************************************************************
> > > Power purchase bills exceed $7.5 billion
> > >
> > > Published Tuesday, July 10, 2001, in the San Jose Mercury News
> > > BY MARK GLADSTONE, NOAM LEVEY AND DION NISSENBAUM
> > >
> > > Mercury News Sacramento Bureau
> > >
> > > SACRAMENTO -- Six months after jumping into the electricity business,
> the
> > > Davis administration on Monday provided the first detailed glimpse of
> > > California's daily power purchases, showing more than $5 billion in
> > > payments, much of it to government-owned utilities and private
> companies
> > > that state officials have branded as price gougers.
> > >
> > > The state spent an additional $2.5 billion on a variety of contracts
> and
> > > other electricity services designed to stabilize the volatile energy
> > > markets, according to documents that the state agreed to release last
> > week
> > > amid a legal dispute over public access to the data.
> > >
> > > In roughly the first five months of the year, the state shelled out
> $1.2
> > > billion to Atlanta-based Mirant, the most any company was paid for
> > > electricity, followed by $1 billion to Powerex, the marketing arm of BC
> > > Hydro in British Columbia. It also paid $331 million to the Los Angeles
> > > Department of Water and Power.
> > >
> > > The documents raise questions about some of the common assumptions that
> > > have arisen around the electricity crisis. For instance, almost 40
> > percent
> > > of the state's purchases have come from government-run power generators
> > in
> > > California and elsewhere, but not Texas; some of the biggest suppliers
> > are
> > > from the Northwest.
> > >
> > > Gov. Gray Davis, who has ambitions to run for the White House, has put
> > much
> > > of the blame for the soaring costs of power on energy companies based
> in
> > > President Bush's home state.
> > >
> > > The figures are tucked inside 1,770 of pages of invoices that Davis has
> > > resisted divulging, saying disclosure would encourage suppliers to
> charge
> > > more. The state, which last month released information on its long-term
> > > electricity contracts worth $43 billion, agreed Thursday to release the
> > > first quarter details.
> > >
> > > Short on explanation
> > >
> > > The figures were disclosed late Monday by the California Department of
> > > Water Resources, which buys power for the state's financially strapped
> > > major utilities, and seem to buttress the administration's contention
> > that
> > > the price of power is gradually dropping but offer little or no
> > explanation
> > > for what prompted the decrease.
> > >
> > > In January, for instance, the average price for power on the spot
> market
> > > was $321 a megawatt hour. It peaked in April at $332 and dropped to
> $271
> > in
> > > May.
> > >
> > > One megawatt powers about 750 homes.
> > >
> > > Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said the price data supports the
> > governor's
> > > assertions that California has been gouged. ``The bad guys are clearly
> > the
> > > out-of-state generators,'' Maviglio said. ``There has been a
> significant
> > > shift of money out of California.''
> > >
> > > But the documents fail to shed much light on whether, as the
> > administration
> > > contends, the price drop was due to long-term power contracts
> negotiated
> > by
> > > the state earlier this year. Critics contend that the Davis
> > administration
> > > panicked and rushed into deals that commit the state to pay high prices
> > for
> > > many years.
> > >
> > > Used for support
> > >
> > > Republican officials used the price information to bolster their
> attacks
> > > against Davis, a Democrat, for signing long-term contracts with power
> > > generators even as the price of power on the spot market was coming
> down,
> > > partly because of the declining price of natural gas used to fuel many
> > > plants.
> > >
> > > ``It's more clear than ever that the long-term contracts are a bad
> > deal,''
> > > said Assemblyman Tony Strickland, R-Camarillo. ``The governor's really
> > hurt
> > > the ratepayers for the next five or 10 years.''
> > >
> > > The newly released bills highlight the volatility of California's
> energy
> > > market, where the price per megawatt hour ranged from $70 to $1,000. On
> > any
> > > given day, the records show, the prices from seller to seller varied
> > > widely, with some of the highest prices being charged by public
> utilities
> > > and companies outside Texas.
> > >
> > > On one day in February, for example, San Diego-based Sempra Energy was
> > > charging $165 per megawatt hour, the Eugene Water and Electric Board
> was
> > > charging nearly $500 and Duke Energy, a North Carolina company, was
> > > charging up to $575.
> > >
> > > The state's daily spending peaked May 10 at $102.4 million for all
> power,
> > > including the spot market and contracted power.
> > >
> > > The state began buying power in mid-January on behalf of the state's
> > major
> > > utilities, which were unable to borrow money to buy power after
> amassing
> > > enormous debts for electricity.
> > >
> > > San Jose-based Calpine Corp., which is building several new power
> plants
> > > around California including one in South San Jose, did only $29 million
> > > worth of business with the state in the first five months of the year,
> > > according to the figures.
> > >
> > > The state began buying power in mid-January when Pacific Gas & Electric
> > Co.
> > > and Southern California Edison Co. were on the ropes financially. PG&E
> > > later went into bankruptcy.
> > >
> > > On Monday, state lawmakers took another shot at trying to cobble
> together
> > a
> > > plan to rescue financially ailing Edison.
> > >
> > > While most concede that a rescue plan Davis worked out with Edison will
> > not
> > > win the necessary support in the Legislature, lawmakers have created
> > > several working groups to come up with alternatives.
> > >
> > > Compromise plan
> > >
> > > On Monday, state Sen. Byron Sher, D-Redwood City, unveiled the latest
> > > compromise proposal that seeks to protect average ratepayers and small
> > > businesses from further rate increases and forces everyone else to help
> > > finance the Edison bailout.
> > >
> > > The ``shared pain'' proposal would force power producers, owed about $1
> > > billion, to take a 30 percent ``haircut'' and agree to forgive about
> $300
> > > million in Edison debts. Edison would be asked to swallow $1.2 billion
> --
> > > about a third of its debt. And big users would be asked to pay off the
> > > remaining $2 billion in debts, possibly by paying higher prices for
> > power.
> > >
> > > In exchange, large companies would be given the opportunity to buy
> power
> > on
> > > the open market, a system that would allow many of them to sign cheap
> > > energy deals.
> > >
> > > Sher presented the proposal to Senate Democrats Monday afternoon, but
> it
> > > remains unclear how much support the framework will receive in the
> > > Legislature.
> > >
> > > Contact Mark Gladstone at mgladstone@sjmercury.com or (916) 325-4314.


Are they going to build it if it is not fully subscribed?  Or is Williams going to take the risk?  I wonder why Entergy is taking space?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Polsky, Phil
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	FW: Western Frontier

Mark,

Steph said you were looking for some info on the Western Frontier project that was in NGI today.  I called the contact person at Western Frontier/Williams and he told me that the project was not in fact fully subscribed.  He was obviously interested in speaking with you again.

I glanced through their filing, and apparently the open season led to PAs for 365,000 Dth/d of the 540,000 Dth/d of available capacity.  PAs have been signed with the following:

Marathon - 75,000 dth/d
Williams Marketing - 200,000 dth/d
Utilicorp United - 15,000 dth/d
Entergy - 75,000 dth/d

With the exception of Marathon, everyone signed up for ten years.  Marathon committed to five years, with an option to extend for two years.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Phil

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sanders, Dale T." <Dale.T.Sanders@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:27 PM
To:	Polsky, Phil
Subject:	Western Frontier

Phil,
Here is the information that you requested.  If I can be of any other assistance, please do not hesitate to call.
 <<Electronic Version for e-mail.doc>>  <<WFSYSMAP_1.jpg>>  <<WFSYSMAP_1.pdf>>  <<WFrontierfiling.dot>>
Dale T. Sanders
Williams Gas Pipeline-SouthCentral/ Western Frontier
Project Manager-Business Development
Phone:   270-688-6944
Fax:      270-688-6320
)  e-mail:   <mailto:dale.t.sanders@williams.com << File: Electronic Version for e-mail.doc >>

 - Electronic Version for e-mail.doc << File: WFSYSMAP_1.jpg >>
 - WFSYSMAP_1.jpg << File: WFSYSMAP_1.pdf >>
 - WFSYSMAP_1.pdf << File: WFrontierfiling.dot >>
 - WFrontierfiling.dot


Good Afternoon John,

Here is the SQL string you requested.

Thanks,  Poston

Please let me know if you have any questions or when you are ready to redeploy the stored procedure.


To follow up on yesterday's e-mail, I am attaching two transcribed voice-mails from Chuck La Bella received today.  I thought you might be interested in the latter half of the first voice-mail, coming from a prosecutor.

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify Kathryn A. Pugh at kpugh@pkns.com and immediately delete this message from your system.

 - #287031v1 -LABELLA, CHUCK V-M FROM.wpd


you too

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

nothing.  i said bye.  have a good night

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

what

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

whatever, bye!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

thats awesome, ok i will see you tomorrow

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:07 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yes silly i told you next week.  we are supposed to get an e-mail tomorrow about it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:07 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

is it really opening

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

at the met?  yes until the body shop opens

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you working out accross the street

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:05 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

k bye!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:05 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

my country club,

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

where?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no im not, i am going to work out now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

and mean....i forgot that one!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

um, i dont know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

so why are you now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i wasnt

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

everyone.  i thought that you weren't talking to me for a while?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

everyone,  who is down there

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

he he i am so funny!  and you are still a big jerk!  who all is up there?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:01 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:01 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

don't want to

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:00 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

why

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:58 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

um no

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:58 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no i did so come up and visit

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:54 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

did you not think that was funny?


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
05/19/99 12:38 PM ---------------------------

Monica Jordan
05/18/99 02:57 PM
To: Alan B Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristina Mordaunt/HOU/ECT@ECT
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janice Moore@CCMAIL
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NEW LAW CLERK...

Our first summer law clerk will begin his clerkship here tomorrow Wednesday,
May 19, 1999.  His name is Bill Neely and he is a law student at the
University of Houston.   Bill will be located at EB 3885.  Please notify the
attorneys in your group that he is available to accept assignments.

   Thanks.

  Monica


Bob,

we had the meeting today called your desk at 1pm PDX time with no answer.   not sure what went on there
because we also didn't get your voicemail.

we'll have to catch up next week.

From:	Robert Anderson/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 04:52 PM CDT
To:	Cooper Richey/CAL/ECT@ECT, Robert Anderson/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Craig Mclurg/CAL/ECT@ECT, Colin Poon Tip/CAL/ECT@ECT, "Greg K Berry/CAL/ECT@ECT cmclurg" <Greg K Berry/CAL/ECT@ECT cmclurg@cadvision.com>@SMTP@enronXgate
Subject:	RE: Fundamentals Web Development Conference Call

Didn't receive a call today.... you guys are probably just really busy.

Should we do it on Monday, or just wait until next Thursday?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cooper Richey
Sent:	Thursday, May 03, 2001 6:46 PM
To:	Robert Anderson
Cc:	Craig Mclurg; Colin Poon Tip; Greg K Berry/CAL/ECT@ECT cmclurg
Subject:	Re: Fundamentals Web Development Conference Call

Bob (and all),

let's postpone until tomorrow (or next week if you're not available) - no need to force the meeting.

can you do it tomorrow at the normal time?

Cooper

Robert Anderson
05/03/2001 11:11 AM
To:	Craig Mclurg/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:	Cooper Richey/CAL/ECT@ECT, Colin Poon Tip/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg K Berry/CAL/ECT@ECT cmclurg@cadvision.com
Subject:	Re: Fundamentals Web Development Conference Call   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Calgary Gang -

I have a doctor's appointment this afternoon, and will be leaving a little early. Can we do this at 12:00 Portland time?

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


I guess we know now that they weren't waiting on us, since they hadn't
finished the GE docs.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2001 06:45
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/25/2001 01:47:15 AM
To: "Kent Shoemaker (E-mail)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>
cc: "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "Rick Vicens
(E-mail)" <rvicens@deltapower.com>, "John Tisdale (E-mail)"
<jtisdale@arclightcapital.com>, "Amy Weed (E-mail)" <aweed@jhancock.com>,
"John Anderson (E-mail)" <jcsanderson@jhancock.com>, "BURKE, Ted (TDB)"
<ted.burke@freshfields.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>,
"Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Pegasus - GE Documents

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

We attach clean and blacklined copies of the following:

(a) the GE Consent and Agreement;
(b) the GE opinion;
(c) the GE Letter Agreement; and
(d) the GE receipt of funds letter.

We would be grateful for your confirmation that these documents are in final
form.

Regards
Isabel

 - COMPARE004.DOC
 - NY003700033.DOC
 - NY003701281.DOC
 - COMPARE003.DOC
 - COMPARE001.DOC
 - NY003699615.DOC
 - COMPARE002.DOC
 - NY003700961.DOC


As requested, please see attached list of bonds that we have received cancellation notices on.  I spoke to Kate Joslyn, Enron Direct Canada and she said they are working on the sale of Enron Direct Canada.  If you need any more information, please let me know


Shawn, go ahead and give Dave a call to discuss strategy, resources and
approach.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000
10:04 AM ---------------------------

Shawn Cumberland@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/29/2000 08:32 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: meeting

Dave,

I'd love to get together with Dave to get to know him.

Let me know when I should contact him after you've briefed him.

Shawn

David W Delainey@ECT
11/28/2000 09:12 PM
To: Shawn Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: meeting

Shawn, if you are in - I would like you to work with Dave Duran on this
item.  He currently manages the ENA IPP group and the QF Restructuring Group.
I would like to manage this under Dave and your leadership.  He has created a
lot of businesses and value in ENA over the years and can help.

Let me know

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
09:09 PM ---------------------------

Shawn Cumberland@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/27/2000 04:51 PM
To: David W Delainey@ECT
cc:
Subject: meeting

Dave:

Thanks for your time and patience today.

For now, I'll park the theoretical and focus on the practical.  (we can pick
up the other topics later over beers sometime)

I completely agree that the US coal-genco business can offer a huge near-term
win for those that move swiftly.

Thanks for offering me the shot to capitalize on it.

Shawn


Angelica lacks an undergraduate degree.

	From:  Nedre Strambler                           04/12/2000 06:19 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Job #78728

Please review and let me know what you think.
---------------------- Forwarded by Nedre Strambler/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000
07:18 PM ---------------------------

Angelica Soliz <Angelica.Soliz@Halliburton.com> on 04/12/2000 04:26:27 PM
To: "'nedre.strambler@enron.com'" <nedre.strambler@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Job #78728

April 12, 2000

Dear Ms. Strambler,

I am just following up on this job (number referenced above).  Please advise
if this position is still open.  Any information you can provide would be
greatly appreciated.

Thanks and regards,

Angelica Soliz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Angelica Soliz
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 11:10 AM
> To: 'nedre.strambler@enron.com'
> Subject: Job #78728
>
> March 21, 2000
>
> Dear Ms. Strambler,
>
> I want to convey my sincere interest in joining Enron as a legal
> specialist.  I feel uniquely qualified in that the work tasks and
> responsibilities I currently perform are almost identical  to your needs.
> I am confident that with my industry knowledge, skills and experience, I
> will be a great asset to Enron's Legal department.  I would welcome the
> chance to demonstrate my abilities.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Angelica Soliz
>
>  <<Soliz Resume.doc>>
>
>

 - Soliz Resume.doc


Jim and Carrin,

It was nice to visit with you this afternoon.  I look forward to working
with you in the coming months.

While I am away, please feel free to contact Martin.  He can be reached
at Mcominsky@aol.com or 713-627-3490, ext. 122.

Jeff Sokoloff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


Start Date: 4/8/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040808.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/8/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SKEETER
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Hi Cheryl,

I've been asked to see what I can find out about the status of the generator
for the Westinghouse 501D.  I've heard stories ranging from it was on the
Titantic, to it was in a rain storm.  Can you shed any light on its status?

Thanks,

Kay


Team,

I spoke with Audrey today who mentioned that their meeting with Tom Brown has
gone well.  She has asked me to set up a meeting regarding Strategy on this
potential acquisition.  Let's plan to meet at 10:00am this Friday, 12/8 in
room EB3335.

Thanks,
Mark


With respect to the flight to Ft. Lauderdale on 9/13, can you see if Steve or Continental can improve our row 25 seats to a bulkhead row for both the outgoing and return flights.   Let me know.

Thanks.


Sir....
Hedy's cell:  916.761.1462
please note:  she may currently be out of range per my contact -- if you need
to but can't reach her,
I can -- perhaps -- get a message to her in a roundabout way!

Joseph


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 06:52 PM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	02/20/2001 06:47 PM

		 To: <acomnes@enron.com>, <dfulton@enron.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>,
<jhartso@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>, <linda.robertson@enron.com>,
<mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: SF Chronicle - Critics Say ISO Rookies Will Hinder Resolving
Crisis

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Tue, 20 Feb
2001 18:42:24 -0600 -----
To:	"Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
cc:	"Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll"
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	SF Chronicle - Critics Say ISO Rookies Will Hinder Resolving Crisis
FYI -  This article has quotes from FERC Chairman Hebert.  He was highly
critical of the "politicized control of transmission."

Critics Say ISO Rookies Will Hinder Resolving Crisis

Carl T. Hall, Chronicle Staff Writer    Tuesday, February 20, 2001

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Experience in the complicated world of energy didn't matter much when Gov.
Gray Davis went shopping for a new set of policymakers to oversee the state-
sponsored California Independent System Operator.

Davis named five new members to the Cal-ISO board last month, replacing an
unwieldy 26-member board whose members were selected to balance competing
interests in electricity supply and transmission.

The prior board was packed with longtime players in various industry and
energy-policy arenas. But the board's reluctance to cap rates, among other
things, led some to question its independence -- and eventually caused its
demise when the Legislature moved to restructure the agency, based in Folsom,
technically a nonprofit public-benefit corporation but in reality an arm of
state energy policy.

The new board includes only one member -- Mike Florio, senior attorney at The
Utility Reform Network (TURN), a San Francisco-based consumer group -- with
any significant background in the energy field.

Florio, a perennial critic of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and other
regulated utilities, was among the original members of the Cal-ISO board
Davis and the Legislature dumped. Now, he is the only veteran left,
surrounded by eager rookies.

"There will be a learning curve, no question," said Terry Winter, Cal-ISO's
chief executive officer.

Remedial training is under way, but critics fear that may get in the way of
solutions to the fast-breaking state power crisis.

Curt Hebert, chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, also
faulted the new board's close ties to Sacramento, saying that "politicized
control of transmission" could deter suppliers from entering California and
sour other states on the idea of regional cooperation.

"The ISO should operate as a truly independent operator of the grid," Hebert
said. "But initial signs are not encouraging. Legislation adopted that makes
the ISO board a political arm of the governor, with five handpicked members,
could prove to be detrimental in the long run."

Other observers view the Sacramento connection as a plus.

"I expect there will be better overall coordination with the state now," said
Susan Schneider, a former PG&E executive who now advises industry clients as
a principal at Phoenix Consulting. "There's been a bit of a disconnect."

The new board members insisted that the governor had started them out with no
marching orders other than to do what's in the public's best interest. And
while Davis' board may not know its new business quite yet, its members boast
some formidable resumes in other fields.

In any case, they have little direct control over the most important policy
matters being decided in Sacramento and Washington. But that's not to say the
Cal-ISO board has no significant role.

"The ISO is going to be an important gear in whatever machine ends up fixing
this thing," said Eric Saltmarsh, general counsel at the state Electricity
Oversight Board.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

,2001 San Francisco Chronicle   Page A11


They are still trying to get people onto the system.  What is going on with
getting that terminal set up so I lawyers can review the products?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 04:03 PM -----

	Sheri Thomas
	02/26/2001 04:02 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Tradespark

Any update?  People are anxious to get on the system.

We are working with them on some other initiatives, and would like to get
this signed asap.

Thanks
Sheri

Mark Greenberg@ENRON
02/20/2001 01:02 PM
To: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Tradespark

Sheri -

I was only able to get to the public face pages.  I have not attempted access
in the last couple of days.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Sheri Thomas@ECT
	02/20/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Tradespark

Were you guys ever able to get into the site?  Just checking on the status.
thanks
Sheri


Temp file until the IT group completes the Internet version.