--------------------------vince kaminski

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaminski, Vince J <Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com>
To: LJM Litigation <ljm.litigation@ENRON.com>
CC: Cooley, Jan <Jan.Cooley@ENRON.com>; Kaminski, Vince J <Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com>
Sent: Fri Dec 28 15:12:02 2001
Subject: FW: Raptors

I am forwarding a copy of a message I sent some time ago to the same address.
The lawyer representing the Special Committee (David Cohen) could not locate it.
The message disappeared as well form my mailbox. Fortunately,
I have preserved another copy.

Vince Kaminski

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	VKaminski@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:12 PM
To:	dcohen@wilmer.com
Cc:	srosen@wilmer.com; Bharati, Rakesh; Vasant.Shanhogue@enron.com; VKaminski@aol.com; vkamins@enron.com
Subject:	Raptors

David,
I am forwarding to you, as promised, the text of the 10/04/2001  message to Ryan Siurek regarding Raptor valuations. The message is stored on my PC at home. It disappeared from my mailbox on the Enron system.
Vince Kaminski
*******************************************************************************
Subj:   FW: LJM/Raptor valuations
Date:   10/4/01 8:30:17 AM Central Daylight Time
From:    Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com (Kaminski, Vince J)
To:    vkaminski@aol.com

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Kaminski, Vince J
> Sent:    Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:28 AM
> To:    Siurek, Ryan
> Cc:    Kaminski, Vince J; Buy, Rick; Port, David
> Subject:    LJM/Raptor valuations
>
> Ryan,
>
> In the follow up to the meeting we had on Wednesday I would like
> to reinforce one point I made. I feel strongly that I cannot support
> the valuations my group has produced so far for the LJM/Raptor
> related transactions without examination of all the related legal
> documents.
>
> I feel that we did solid work based on verbal information,  but I
> cannot
> guarantee the quality of the final product without looking at the
> contracts.
> These transactions are too complex and controversial to bypass due
> diligence requirements
> that you would expect from any professional.
>
> Vince Kaminski
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yc05.mx.aol.com (rly-yc05.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.37]) by air-yc04.mail.aol.com (v80.17) with ESMTP id MAILINYC44-1004093017; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 09:30:17 2000
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by rly-yc05.mx.aol.com (v80.21) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYC51-1004093003; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 09:30:03 -0400
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw03p.corp.enron.com [192.168.110.110])
   by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08) with ESMTP id f94DU2302305
   for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:30:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified) by corp.enron.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with SMTP id <T56633e1d36c0a86e6e7b0@corp.enron.com> for <vkaminski@aol.com>;
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:30:02 -0500
Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.40]) by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
   Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:30:02 -0500
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
Subject: FW: LJM/Raptor valuations
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:28:16 -0500
Message-ID: <31738B46B7BD864080808A19977D9F75449525@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: LJM/Raptor valuations
Thread-Index: AcFM2FMHpaiFOfRsQDCq6NwF20YoUQAABKQw
From: "Kaminski, Vince J" <Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com>
To: <vkaminski@aol.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Oct 2001 13:30:02.0949 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC3E3750:01C14CD8]


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Tracy L. Geaccone
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Tracy Geaccone
Report Total: $337.55
Amount Due Employee: $337.55

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 08:30
AM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 04/04/2001 07:21:04 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:
Subject: daily charts and matrices as hot links 4/4

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2000 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude38.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas38.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil38.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded38.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG38.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG38.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL38.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Sara

Thanks for the note and good wishes!

Probably wondering what I'm doing in the office on a Sundy as a
newly-wed:catching up on email!

Justin's group deal with equity trading;  Jonathan Marsh will cover on the
regulatory side.

Hope things are fine back at the ranch and going well for you.

Regards

Paul

From: Sara Shackleton on 13/03/2001 13:17 CST
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: equity trading in the U.K.

Paul:

Just checking to see if you are the lawyer monitoring equity trading in the
U.K.  I am charged with the oversight of Gary Hickerson's equity activity
here in Houston and I want to coordinate with the London lawyer.  Please
advise.

Also, I heard that you were recently married.  Congratulations!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Gee, and at $120/bottle, I can load up on a few cases.  At that price, the
Mondavi's must be hoping Bush wins so America can spend the tax break on that
tasty Reserve.  (Kidding!)

Do you qualify for the discount on the Reserve, too?

GO RALPH!

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	11/06/2000 01:01 PM

		 To: Cameron <cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff Dasovich <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>,
"Prentice @ Berkeley" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
<PSellers@pacbell.net>, Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

1997 Robert Mondavi Winery Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve
(Exceptional) - Epitomizes Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon, the grape that is
the backbone of America's most important wine district. Even at Robert
Mondavi, which has produced its share of impressive cabs, the 1997 reserve
stands out. The 1997 vintage was the best of the 1990s in the Napa Valley,
yielding rich, concentrated red wines. Robert Mondavi Reserve's showy aromas
of spice, cassis, and cedar make a strong impression in the glass. On the
palate, the wine is deeply layered with pure dark-berry fruit flavors, has
firm, ripe tannins and an ultra-smooth finish with superb length. ($120)
Wine Enthusiast
November 2000 (Circulation: 79,000)
1997 Robert Mondavi Winery Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve - (91) Very
tight nose, with blackberry, coffee and cocoa notes, this is a big wine that
shows great intensity and depth. Quite closed now, the dark profile keeps its
cards close to the vest. One thing for sure: this definitely one for the
cellar. The finish is lengthy, with brisk tannins as well as espresso and
bitter-chocolate notes. Hold for eight to ten years; this wine should keep
till 2020. ($120)
Beverage Industry News
December 2000
HEADLINE: "Perfection in California"
AUTHOR: Wilfred Wong
SUMMARY:
Recommended:
1997 Opus One Napa Valley Red Wine (100) -- Could the 1997 Opus One be that
elusive wine that one never finds? In my continual pursuit for wine nirvana,
I have traveled to Bordeaux and back with stops in Italy and Australia and
for what? Besides losing my luggage, tracking through customs and using
non-functional phone cards, I have been searching for that wine of
perfection. Could this wine finally be the one? This just released Opus One
may be the absolute finest young red wine I have ever tasted in a bottle
(barrel samples don't count). Aristocratically structured the 1997 Opus One
magnificently perfumes the air with aromas of ripe, succulent fruit,
fragrant, sweet earth and delicate, white flowers. Persistent to the point of
perfection, this wine does not allow its captive audience to escape its web
of Cabernet ecstasy. Made with the five important varietals of Bordeaux (82%
Cabernet Sauvignon, 8% Cabernet Franc, 5% Merlot, 4% Malbec, and 1% Petit
Verdot), this spellbinding wine commands attention. This is my top wine of
the year. (Best Served 2002-2018). ($130)

WineToday.com
October 30, 2000
HEADLINE: "Wine Reviews"
AUTHORS: Tim Fish
SUMMARY:
Recommended:
1997 Robert Mondavi Winery Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve - (4

stars) Comments: A stunner. It brings out the best in the 1997 vintage. It
has deep, rich fruit with a ripe, silky texture; General Qualities:
Medium-full bodied, complex, dry, balanced acidity, strong oak impression,
fairly tannic; Color: Dark ruby; Aromas: Black cherry, cassis, chocolate,
coffee, licorice, pencil lead, toast, walnut; Other Descriptors: Balanced,
long finish, ripe, supple, velvety. ($120)

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Dear Mr. Trice,

On behalf of Jeff Skilling, I am writing to thank you for the invitation to
the CAM gala on April 6.  Unfortunately, Jeff will be unable to join you as
he will traveling out of the country on that date.

With regard to your second invitation to meet your business partner next
week, I regret to tell you that he is unable to accept the offer.  He will be
in So. America, and therefore, will not attend the GS conference in Aspen.

Sincerely,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

Roy Trice <RTrice@carlsoncapital.com> on 03/15/2001 04:07:07 PM
To: "'Jeff.Skilling@enron.com'" <Jeff.Skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Social and Work

Jeff,

Two things:

Would you like to join Liz and me at the Contemporary Arts Museum Gala,
Friday, April 6th at 7.30, Bayou Club, Black Tie?

I would like to introduce you to my business partner, Clint Carlson in Aspen
next week.  He is going to attend the Goldman Sachs Natural Gas conference
March 18th - 21st .  Clint is the chief investment officer of our firm and
is the portfolio manager for our relative value arbitrage strategy (pairs
trading) which includes about $450mm in energy pairs.

Please let me know, Roy Trice, 214.932.9618.


The following series have stopped reporting from the source until
further notice.

CZDR
CZLBR


Is this something you are working on?
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 09:55 AM -----

	Julia H Chin@ENRON
	09/11/2000 08:16 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

hi mark -- this is a currency swap agreement for the pending condor follow-on
offering.  could you have some one from your group take a look of this
agreement?  we are printing the preliminary offering memo this friday and the
deal closes toward the end of this month.

thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Julia H Chin/NA/Enron on 09/11/2000 08:09
AM ---------------------------

JGallup@milbank.com on 09/09/2000 01:21:13 AM
To: barry.schnapper@enron.com, dan.boyle@enron.com,
trevor.randolph@enron.com, brian.steinbrueck@enron.com,
julia.h.chin@enron.com, gina.karathanos@enron.com, annmarie.tiller@enron.com,
Brent.Vasconcellos@enron.com, clint.walden@enron.com, ryan.siurek@enron.com,
lnath@dlj.com, dscott@dlj.com, dcapolon@dlj.com, lmallett@dlj.com,
mbdavis@dlj.com, dhemsey@dlj.com, cwebb@dlj.com, mprotz@dlj.com,
mcho@dlj.com, paul.f.cambridge@db.com, mike.jakubik@db.com,
craig.orchant@db.com, george.tyson@db.com, ross.newman@db.com,
maia.babbs@db.com, ute.muenstermann@db.com, peter.zabel@db.com,
joseph.kopec@db.com, mspradling@velaw.com, rastin@velaw.com,
eosterberg@velaw.com, tchandler@velaw.com, crankin@velaw.com,
pwarman@velaw.com, silversteina@sewkis.com, sbaratta@sewkis.com,
aroberts@wilmingtontrust.com, jlawler@wilmingtontrust.com,
gmitchell@ustrust.com, lyoung@ustrust.com, mazie@rlf.com,
tom.mazza@deweyballantine.com, joan.wheatley@deweyballantine.com,
hershel.wein@deweyballantine.com, robert.frastai@deweyballantine.com
cc: TDavis@milbank.com, BKayle@milbank.com, JGallup@milbank.com,
AWalker@milbank.com, ELim@milbank.com, SRenas@milbank.com,
KRiester@milbank.com

Subject: Osprey II - Enron Agreement

Attached, please find a draft of the Enron Agreement for the Osprey II
transaction.? Please be advised that this draft is simultaneously being
distributed to our clients and therefore, remains subject to their review and
comments.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Best regards,

Joy K. Gallup

 <<Enron Agreement.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - Enron Agreement.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001
04:48 PM ---------------------------

Sergio Assad
06/21/2001 11:23 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Regulatory Affairs events

Rick

As per your request, see attached summary regarding our activities in Brasil
from Jan to April.
Unfortunately we couldn't sent to you before due to a lot problems we are
facing here.
Thanks
Sergio Assad

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001
04:48 PM ---------------------------

Guillermo Canovas
07/03/2001 09:02 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Power Decree 804 and Resolution 135

This is to inform you the recent approval of the below commented rules in
Argentina. If the economic and political environment gets calmer, these rules
will be an important step in the power deregulation process an will allow us
to reach some of the goals set for the regulatory group for this year.

Goal 1- Eliminate or Increase fuel declaration caps: there will not be more
fuel declarations but price declarations (Section 1, Resolution 135). The
rules do not mention any cap for price declarations.

Goal 2 - Daily fuel declaration: The 6 month fuel declaration was replaced by
a daily price declaration (Section 1, Resolution 135).

Goal 3 - Reduce or eliminate the obligation to physically back up agreements
with end users or LDCs: According to the interpretation of AGEERA (Gencos
Association) we would have been gotten also this objective and marketers may
already buy or sell spot as long as the contract with the customer does not
have supply guarantee (Section 5, Resolution 135). It is not clear in the
rule wich is the condition for marketers to buy or sell spot.

Now the Secretariat of Energy must issue its own Resolution to amend the
technical Procedures in line with these rules. From the text of Resolution
135 (sections 3 c, 5 and considerations) there would be a good probability to
reach other two goals through the Secretariat of Energy rule:
Reduce minimum term for Output & Demand Marketing Agreements to one month
Eliminate or reduce to 1 MW the threshold for Output Marketing Agreements

Amr and I are asisting Buenos Aires Ofice to analize the new rules to
eventually submit comments to the Secretariat of Energy.
Attached is the document with the regulatory goals.
Regards
Guillermo

---------------------- Forwarded by Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron on 07/03/2001
08:40 PM ---------------------------

Andrea Calo
06/29/2001 06:49 PM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sergio
Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Roberto
Volonte/ENRON@enronXgate, Laura Feldman/SA/Enron@Enron, Guillermo
Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron, Maria Pia Beccaccini/SA/Enron@Enron, Rodolfo
Freyre/SA/Enron@Enron, John J Shoobridge/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Power Decree 804 and Resolution 135

In an attempt to further reduce State intervention in the power market, on
June 19, the Executive Branch issued Decree 804/01 which completes the
deregulation process of the power industry initiated in 1992, and amends
Electricity Law 24.065.  On June 26 the Minister of Infrastructure issued
Resolution 135/01 setting forth  the guidelines for the future regulation of
the Decree.

The Secretariat of Energy's resolution that will regulate the Decree will be
effective as from September 1, 2001. All agents of the electric sector will
be invited to comment the terms of regulatory decree, although such comments
will be used for informational purposes and will not bind the Secretariat of
Energy to make any changes whatsoever to its original document.

Although Decree No 804/01 is effective as from today, there are doubts in the
industry as to whether it will be abolished in the future by Congress.  The
reason for this uncertainty is that such Decree was issued within the
framework of the Competitivity Law, by which Congress delegated to the
Executive Branch its  powers to legislate  specifically on changes required
to transform the economy.  Although this Decree and the changes it fosters
indirectly affect the economy, since the law it amends is not purely
"economical", it may be questioned.  There is no term within which Congress
may exercise this right.

Please find a summary of the relevant changes below.

Generators Remuneration:
Forward Market: freely negotiated
Spot Market:  only payment of "hourly spot price" at each node.
Hourly Spot Price: determined by price offers based on demand and
transportation constraints

Daily Declarations
The day before the daily dispatch, each Generator shall:
declare its price offers for each  peak, shoulder and valley hour at its
node;
declare its maximum operating limits and minimum available capacity;
offer all of its available capacity.

Calculation of Hourly Spot Price "HSP"
HSP shall be calculated by the OED according to procedure to be determined by
the Secretariat of Energy, not based on marginal costs as it is today.
Prices shall be calculated at each node before the initiation of each day.
At the end of each day prices shall be recalculated based off real operations
on the system.

Spot Market
Generators and Marketers shall be paid on an hourly basis according to the
volume of energy delivered at the node, which shall be valued at the HSP.
If distributors, large users and/or marketers enter into supply contracts
then to clear transactions on the spot market , the OED shall consider that
the sellers (Marketers/Generators) assume their clients payment obligations
before the market.
On spot market transactions, Generators shall not receive payments for any
other concept.

Forward Market
Generators and Marketers may enter into contracts with distributors,
marketers and large users at freely negotiated prices and terms.

Marketers
Are now considered agents of the electric sector.
May enter into forward contracts and/or carry our purchase and sale
transactions on the spot market at the node HSP.
Must declare their offer and demand at each node of the system.
Their obligations shall be similar to those of Generators and Distributors
when they transact at the MEM.

Congestion Rights
Right to receive profits resulting from the difference in energy prices
between two nodes related to the link and the capacity charge of the relevant
transmission system.
In the case of:
Existing transportation lines under concession, these rights belong to the
State, which will sell them under a public offering called by the
Secretariat of Energy.
Existing transportation lines carried out by an independent transporter shall
belong to such transporter.
New transportation lines, shall belong to the owner of the same.

Expansions
Sole Risk Investment Expansions: Open to anyone who is interested; will
require technical and environmental certification of the ENRE and license
from the                 Secretariat of  Energy.

System Reliability Expansions:  Shall be built by awardee of public tender.

Distributors
Have to satisfy all demand of users within their area that have the choice of
independently contracting their supply in the  MEM; Distributors may offer
contracting options with or without supply guaranty; these contracts shall be
considered special contracts
When they contract their demand with Generators and/or Marketers, the general
terms of the contracts as well as the procedure for selecting suppliers will
be subject to guidelines established by the Secretariat of Energy;
In order for the price under these contracts to be passed through to their
end users tariffs, the relation between the term of the contracts and the
volume purchased must comply with a chart that basically states that the
greater the term of the contract, the lesser the percentage of contracted
energy.
In any case, the total amount of energy contracted can not be in excess of
the total demand of users that can't transact on the MEM.

Forced Dispatch
Distributors may request forced dispatch of certain units;
The Distributor that requests forced dispatch is responsible for payment of
the same, Secretariat of Energy to control if forced dispatch costs are
reasonable.
Such price shall not be transferred to end users and shall not be taken into
account to calculate the HSP.

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001
04:48 PM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/07/2001 06:57 PM
To: Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro@Enron

Subject: Cuiaba Issues - July 6 situation-

Luiz. Thank you for your note.  We are still in the boxing ring!. The first
round was won but we still have some more rounds to go. Next week is the
consent, provably in two weeks we will discuss the regulatory obstacles..

Jose
---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/07/2001 05:54 PM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard
07/07/2001 03:41 PM
To: Cuiaba LT
cc: Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cuiaba Issues - July 6 situation-

Topic I -- Amendment 4

We spent the morning perfecting Aditivo 4 with Furnas, to cover the situation
where the commissioning plan did not go as scheduled. It was signed early
afternoon and sent to Eletrobras.

The Eletrobras Diretoria had not followed this issue closely and need legal
clearance. Furnas and the Ministry (Perazzo) called to give it priority. Late
at night we received word that the "parecer" (opinion) was ready and that it
the Anex would  signed by Eletrobras next Monday and entered into their Board
meeting next Tuesday.

Petrobras sent us the letter we asked but took out of their version a key
word "only". "Only" refers that they will not go after us for non-payment if
Furnas does not pay. In the letter they also stated that they will commence
the loading operation -- at their own risk - Saturday. This was requested by
Perazzo to save logistical time because it takes three days to get to Cuiaba
from the refinery.

[Advised Laine of the situation to check Monday how many trucks were loaded
and  in transit]

We contacted Perazzo through Sergio Assad to get his word that there would
not be a last minute hitch; otherwise, we may have to refuse to take the
diesel and would create a BIG PR problem for all.

Topic III - Consent Package (Opinions, Aditivo, Consent)
Furnas came in with the list of issues they wanted to discuss. I instead
insisted that we treat this meeting as a continuation of the MME meeting and
follow the Agenda  by looking at the Consent document package -- actually go
over the text -  that they find objectionable, and,  if it the text had a
direct link with any of their issues, we would discuss and examine the
relative positions.

What they told me is what they have told me before, that some of the issues
have nothing to do with the Consent but they want it as a condition to agree
to the package. Which is fine to me, because it will make it clear to the
government what we have been saying --- they want to change the deal. In
Furnas' defense, I need to add that they feel they have been handed a bad
contract  and they want regulatory relief, which it has been granted, on a
case-by-case basis, in other deals. So part of their strategy is to force
MME, or Aneel to provide some tariff relief.

I asked them to list out  the key issues with the Consent-  Old-- a) the 90
days additional time (Furnas), b) The guarantee substitution at the time of
privatization, c) the lenders involvement on contract changes "we do not want
to go to Washington to negotiate" - Newer - d) giving up their right to ask
Aneel to "homologar", ratify; rather than "registrar" contract changes [big
risk for us] . I believe the have more direct issues.

We go back to Rio Monday (another holiday down the drain) ..and Tuesday to
complete the list -- Topic II -- Regulatory conflicts

Jose


Hey Ken,

Sorry it has taken so long to get back with you, but...We've had an
interesting couple of weeks here.  Craig Faulbaum has taken personal some
time off (I think that this is the 4th week).  So, we have picked up his
trades.  Tom restructured the EOL trading.  Carey has gone to Gas Daily and I
have taken over the Waha trading for an interim period.  (I'm still
responsible for our overall position, but Ami is watching it during
trading.)  In other words, everyone on my desk is doing double duty.  And, of
course, Tom expects nothing to fall through the gaps (not cracks, anymore).
He has two opening on the trading side that we (Stacey and I) are filling.  I
don't know if he has even interviewed anyone yet.  I am getting very
frustrated with the whole business.  It doesn't see that he even appreciates
the amount of time and stress we are going through to pick up his slack.
Wheww...That feels a little better... getting some of that off my chest.

Anyway, Tonya is very uncomfortable.  I think that baby is going to come
along any day now (due date is still 3/18).  We are both definitely ready.
The desk is really going to be in a fix when I'm out with that.  That's just
too bad.  (I half expect Tom to ask me to come in some.  I've got a real
quick answer to that.)

How are things at home?  Linda doesn't have you working too much does she?  I
just bought the materials to put a sprinkler system in our front yard.  If
things get weak on your stock trading, I've got some trenches you can dig for
extra cash!  It shouldn't be too bad, I bought a brand new sharp-shooter.
(Of course with a new shovel, I'd have to knock some off of your hourly pay.)

The grant price on the employee options is $55.50.

I hope everything is going good for you.  I would like to have lunch with you
sometime.  I will let you know when things work out here, so that we can do
that.  Or...I can give you a call when I'm out for paternity leave and we can
go one day then.  Talk to you later.

D


Wendy Marsh
816 Greenland Drive
Fayetteville, NC 28305
handsheal52@earthlink.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Wendy Marsh


Your confirmation # is 67192516, Holiday Inn Saturday night.....

mc


More Coral stuff I haven't read.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 05:38
PM ---------------------------

"Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com> on 12/04/2000 02:35:20 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com>, "Pipitone, Paul"
<paulpipitone@akllp.com>

Subject: Attached Files

Kay,

Attached are blacklined version of the CA Energy Development breakout
agreements.  They show the changes made from the original form agreement
to the latest version of each agreement, which I sent out to you about
an hour ago.  Thanks, Chris
 <<Comparison of 554888.6 to 83277.2.DOC>>  <<Comparison of 554888.6 to
83242.3.DOC>>
 - Comparison of 554888.6 to 83277.2.DOC
 - Comparison of 554888.6 to 83242.3.DOC


Attached is the Enron MBA Excellence Fund Scholars Dinner invitation.  RSVP
Karen Marshall at 713-853-7632 or Melinda Nelson at 512-471-7603.


that will work, I'll put it down.
kh

-----Original Message-----
From: Gapinski, Michael [mailto:michael.gapinski@ubspainewebber.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Cc: Herrera, Rafael J.
Subject: RE: Meeting for 11/6

How does 2 PM on Thursday, November 15, sound?

-----Original Message-----
From: Hyatt, Kevin [mailto:Kevin.Hyatt@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:41 PM
To: Gapinski, Michael
Cc: Herrera, Rafael J.
Subject: Meeting for 11/6

Mike-
	I will need to rechedule as I will be out of town that day.
What about sometime either 11/15 or 16?

thanks
Kevin Hyatt

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
******************************************************
Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions:
Please do not transmit orders and/or instructions
regarding your UBSPaineWebber account(s) by e-mail.
Orders and/or instructions transmitted by e-mail will
not be accepted by UBSPaineWebber and UBSPaineWebber
will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.

Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
UBSPaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and
review the content of all e-mail communications sent
and/or received by its employees.


As you are all aware, EBS has grown to be a significant part of Enron.  The
EBS/Blockbuster movies on-demand announcement this week, as Merrill Lynch put
it, &confirms the tremendous inroads Enron has made in the telecommunications
business.8  We expect this deal to be a springboard for enabling EBS to
accomplish even greater things.

Because we believe that EBS is integral to Enron,s success, it is becoming
increasingly important for greater interaction among EBS senior management,
corporate leadership and our Houston-based business units.   In short, we
determined that it is necessary for the CEO to be based in Houston, although
the Portland office will remain an integral part of EBS.

Joe Hirko as CEO and Ken Rice as Chief Commercial Officer have accomplished
great things, and we believe that both are completely qualified to fill the
CEO role moving forward.  However, Joe has decided to stay in Portland for
family reasons, and as a result, Ken will assume the role of CEO for EBS,
effective immediately.

Joe, unfortunately, has decided to leave Enron.  We want to recognize Joe for
his role in making EBS a success.  He started the business, demonstrated its
value to Enron management, and brought the team together to create the EBS
vision.

We do believe that EBS will continue to grow and succeed under Ken,s
leadership.  Throughout his 19-year career with Enron, he has consistently
been a driving force in building businesses.

Please join us in wishing both Joe and Ken great success.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Fleming, Rosalee
Sent:	Monday, April 09, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Cc:	Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	Small Power Plant in Utah

John, Ken Lay asked me to send you the information for the contact person re:  the small power plant in Utah.  His name is Charles Darling at DQ Holdings.  The phone number is 713-572-2244.

Rosie


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	FW: Good article on us

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ryder, Patrick
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Winfree, O'Neal D.; Baumbach, David; Love, Phillip M.; Palmer, B. Scott
Subject:	Good article on us

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_46/b3757078.htm


I will check on the case.  We were not aware or in this case. Could be an administrative filing however I will check and edvise.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Montovano, Steve
Subject: FW: Tariff changes effective October 22, 2001
Importance: High

????

-----Original Message-----
From: Canovas, Guillermo
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:39 PM
To: Montovano, Steve; Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard
Subject: FW: Tariff changes effective October 22, 2001
Importance: High

Our EES folks want to know if anyone within Enron was involved in Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania Tariff changes.
Please let me know what should I answer.
Thanks
Guillermo

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanderhorst, Barry
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:47 PM
To: Canovas, Guillermo
Subject: FW: Tariff changes effective October 22, 2001
Importance: High

Can you determine if anyone within Enron was involved in these proceedings? This tariff change could be significant and this is the first we've hard of it.
Please let me know.
BV
3-3317

-----Original Message-----
From: Driscoll-Ernest, Marde L.
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:52 PM
To: Migden, Janine
Cc: Greif, Donna; Tate, Paul; Vanderhorst, Barry; Wiltfong, Jim;
Sullivan, Colleen; Superty, Robert; Black, Don; Bray, Hayden
Subject: FW: Tariff changes effective October 22, 2001
Importance: High

Janine:  Was anyone in regulatory involved with this?  We found out this was coming last week at the CPA Shipper meeting.  This is going to cause a curve shift which could have been minimized had we known it was coming.  Thanks!  mde

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Rhonda
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:26 PM
To: Bray, Hayden
Cc: Driscoll-Ernest, Marde L.; Vanderhorst, Barry
Subject: FW: Tariff changes effective October 22, 2001

Josh,

Please make sure you are on Shirley's mailing list, I didn't see your name listed.

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: sbardes@nisource.com [mailto:sbardes@nisource.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:09 PM
To: dcarroll@knowledgeinenergy.com; balexander@hess.com;
schang@hess.com; tcochran@ashland.com; jbrown@cmsenergy.com;
dgordon@nge.com; mnguyen@nge.com; rsmith5@enron.com; LCrider@EQT.com;
jkborrell@firstenergycorp.com; bmerlin@wpsenergy.com;
runger@gasmark.com; kmagyar@msmisp.com; lsmorris@mmenergy.com;
wwesmill@manrenergy.com; lpohlman@nfrinc.com; mdubyoski@pepcoenergy.com;
jpwright@pplweb.com; rileynatgas@bridgeport.net;
rileynatgas@bridgeport.net; hanksma@selectenergy.com;
amartin@sempra-slns.com; rastor@shipleyenergy.com;
sburrus@spragueenergy.com; TPWithka@spragueenergy.com;
tphillips@tigernaturalgas.com; cpowers@txu.com
Subject: Tariff changes effective October 22, 2001

The following notice was posted on the Nominations Electronic Bulletin
Board today:

On October 12, 2001 the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission approved
Columbia's tariff filing to become effective on October 22, 2001, subject
to an Administrative Law Judge Recommendation.  This tariff filing includes
several changes that may be important to suppliers, such as changes in
Columbia's banking and balancing service, introduction of a new Flow Order
Management Service, and a new Imbalance Trading Service.

The full text of Columbia's original tariff proposals, as filed with the PA
Public Utility Commission on August 22, 2001, can be accessed at the
following site:

                                     h
ttp://www.columbiagaspamd.com/products_services/tariff_revisions_effective_oct.htm

Shippers serving aggregation pools on the Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania,
Inc. system should carefully review Columbia's new Elective Balancing
Service (proposed tariff pages 164 - 169) and choose one of the three
balancing service options for each aggregation pool.  Also, suppliers who
have been designated as an authorized agent for non-aggregated customers
may choose an elective balancing option on behalf of those customers.
Columbia's current estimated rate for Option 1, Full Balancing Service, is
as follows:

SGS, SDS Customers  $0.20/Mcf
LDS, MLS  Customers $0.10/Mcf

Please note that Columbia's interruptible banking and balancing service
will no longer be available.  The cost for the interruptible service
($0.1109/Mcf for SGS and SDS, and $0.0358 for LDS and MLS) will be removed
from customers' distribution rates when the new Elective Balancing Services
become effective.

Under the newly approved Elective Balancing Service (Rider EBS), customers
or their authorized agents are given 20 days in which to elect their
service option.  Customers or their authorized agents who do not elect one
of the three Elective Balancing Service options on or before November 12,
2001 will default to Option 1, Full Balancing Service.  Columbia will post
final rates for Rider EBS Option 1 by the close of business on November 15,
2001.  If the final rates exceed the above estimated rates by more than
20%, customers or their authorized agents who have elected Option 1 may
change their election by submitting a change to Columbia in writing  by the
close of business on November 20, 2001.  Columbia will begin providing
service under the elected option as of December 1, 2001.

A form for the election of Rider EBS options will be e-mailed to the
"notices" contact person for each supplier that is active on the Columbia
Gas of Pennsylvania systemwhen it is available.

Please contact your Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. representative at
412-572-7117 with any questions relating to these new services.

Attached are the forms and a brief outline of the changes.

(See attached file: EBS & FOMS forms.doc)
Shirley


Here's what happened.
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
10:11 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kam Keiser                           10/30/2000 08:53 AM

To: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackson Logan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, B Scott
Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

I spoke with Bill K. about the TDS positions problems we had this morning.
They had to take TDS down this weekend and when it was brought back up all
the positions were reloaded.

He thinks the new TDS portcalc will be ready to go later this week which will
prevent this from happening again.

Kam


Could I get a copies of these Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC
agreements:

# 96007427, dated 4-1-95, # 96000904, dated 9-1-93, and 96033648, dated
9-1-93.

Thanks!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 05/01/2001 12:46
PM ---------------------------

Alan Comnes
04/11/2001 02:02 PM
To: seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com, rcarroll@bracepatt.com,
asettanni@bracepatt.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com
cc:

Subject: LADWP, BC Hydro, Bonneville Accused of Gouging California

The identities refered to in this article apparently relate to Sheffrin's
study.
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 04/11/2001 02:08
PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 04/11/2001 11:49 AM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W
Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris
Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess
Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES,
Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES,
Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D
Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rosalinda
Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> @ ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES,
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com, Michael
Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mercy Gil/Enron@EnronXGate, Jennifer
Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, David Leboe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: LADWP, BC Hydro, Bonneville Accused of Gouging California

Energy Cost Study Critical of Public Agencies Too
 Power: DWP is among three government-run producers cited as driving prices
up. Spokesmen deny any market manipulation.

By ROBERT J. LOPEZ, RICH CONNELL, Times Staff Writers

????Government-owned utilities, including the Los Angeles Department of Water
and Power, were influential in driving wholesale electricity prices to levels
that helped ignite California's exploding energy crisis during the summer and
fall, according to public and confidential records.
?????For months, Gov. Gray Davis, legislators and consumer advocates have
chiefly blamed a few private power companies for throwing the state into
darkness and economic chaos.
?????But they are just part of the equation.
?????A confidential document obtained by The Times names power providers that
have allegedly manipulated the electricity market. While the document does
identify out-of-state merchants criticized for gouging, it also discloses for
the first time the extent to which public entities allegedly have maximized
profits in the volatile spot market.
?????The document--which decodes the identities of unnamed suppliers in a
recent state study--singles out three government-run agencies as consistently
trying to inflate prices. They are: the DWP, the federally owned Bonneville
Power Administration in the Pacific Northwest and the trading arm of Canada's
BC Hydro in British Columbia.
?????Like a number of privately owned generators, these three producers
offered power at a range of high prices and, sometimes, in large amounts when
the state was most desperate. They also helped saddle California's three
largest utilities with billions of dollars in debt--leading one, Pacific Gas
& Electric, to seek bankruptcy protection last week.
?????The study by the California Independent System Operator, or Cal-ISO,
analyzed thousands of hours of bidding practices for 20 large suppliers in
the spot, or "real-time," market from May to November. The study accounted
for factors such as rising production costs, increased demand, periods of
scarcity and profits that would be earned in a healthy, competitive market.
?????Money earned above that was called excess profits.
?????No entity--public or private--earned as much in alleged excess profits
as British Columbia's Powerex, the state records show.
?????"They were the most aggressive bidders," said Anjali Sheffrin, author of
the coded study.
?????"They had the most amount to bid and the most freedom to bid it in,"
said Sheffrin, who did not discuss any companies by name.
?????The Canadian agency reaped $176 million in alleged excessive
profits--several times the amount collected by all but one of the private
generators. Second on the list was Atlanta-based Southern Co. Energy
Marketing, now called Mirant, which collected nearly $97 million in alleged
inflated earnings.
?????BC Hydro and Mirant--along with the DWP and other producers--say they
played by the rules established under California's flawed deregulation plan
and did not exploit the state's troubles.
?????But BC Hydro officials acknowledge that they did anticipate periods of
severe power shortages and planned for them by letting their reservoirs rise
overnight and then opening them to create hydroelectricity, which could be
produced inexpensively but sold for a premium.
?????"It was the marketplace that determined what the price of electricity
would be at any given time," said BC Hydro spokesman Wayne Cousins. "We
helped keep the lights on in California."
?????And the rates low for their own customers. During the past year, BC
Hydro has stashed hundreds of millions dollars in a "rainy day" account to
ensure that it has among the lowest rates in North America.
?????Los Angeles' Department of Water and Power, although eighth on the list
of alleged profiteers, was among those singled out for seeking high prices
during periods of high demand that helped inflate costs across the entire
spot market, where emergency purchases are made.
?????This, according to state documents, was accomplished by offering power
at incrementally higher prices that would rise substantially with even modest
increases in demand. The strategy also helped prop up prices, keeping them
from falling.
?????The DWP's average hourly bid, or asking price, for electricity
ultimately bought topped such private sellers as Reliant Energy of Houston
and Tulsa-based Williams Cos., two major players in the national energy
market.
?????In addition, the DWP submitted other bids at far higher prices that
could pay off handsomely with even small bumps in demand, the report said,
referring by code to DWP and four other suppliers. "The data shows they
clearly exercised market power to inflate prices further at higher load
conditions."
?????DWP General Manager S. David Freeman called the report's findings
"outrageous," insisting that the utility never tried to inflate prices.
?????"These charges go under the heading there is no good deed that goes
unpunished in this state," Freeman said, noting that DWP power helped avert
more blackouts across the state.
?????He did acknowledge, however, that the agency has charged high prices for
surplus power at the 11th hour but said that was only because it cost more to
produce.
?????"We have consistently charged [Cal-ISO] our cost, plus 15%," he said.
"It's not as though we're up there peddling a bunch of power to jam it down
their throats."
?????Freeman said that when his staff reviewed the coded report, they never
took it personally. "If you're innocent," he said, "you don't look at the
criminal file."
?????Yet another public agency criticized for its behavior in California's
deregulated market was the U.S. government's Bonneville Power Administration,
a nonprofit agency that sells wholesale electricity produced at 29 federal
dams in the Columbia-Snake River basin.
?????Bonneville actually bid slightly lower than the DWP, records show, but
reaped millions more in alleged excessive profits, apparently because it
supplied greater amounts of power during the period studied. Bonneville was
in the top five accused of taking excessive profits.
?????Bonneville officials say some of its profits are used to pay back
federal construction loans and fund an internationally recognized salmon
recovery program.
?????Stephen Oliver, a Bonneville vice president, said his agency did not act
improperly and has asked Cal-ISO for detailed information on how it reached
its conclusions. He said the grid operator often came to Bonneville pleading
for last-minute electricity and offering to pay high prices.
?????"From our point of view, we bid what we had when we had it and we
operated precisely within the terms of their rules," Oliver said.
?????Those rules--and the bidding practices criticized by Cal-ISO--so
distorted the market that Aquila Power Corp. of Missouri, which tried to act
responsibly, has bailed out.
?????It offered the lowest average hourly price of any supplier
studied--slightly more than $8 per megawatt-hour, compared to Mirant's $138,
the highest.
?????But the spot market, as initially designed, made sure that all suppliers
offering power received the highest price paid in any hour.
?????The result: Aquila collected $171 an hour for power it was willing to
sell at a single-digit price.
?????"They weren't the culprits," said Cal-ISO's Sheffrin. "Someone else
drove that up."
?????Aquila spokesman Al Butkus said the company pulled out of the California
market because it was too unpredictable. Although the company made money, he
said, it also could have lost because of possible downward swings.
?????"We looked at it and we didn't feel very comfortable with what we saw,"
he said.
?????The market has since been adjusted to prevent high bids from setting the
price for everyone. But Sheffrin said it hasn't made much difference because
the overall prices are still excessive.
?????"We're saying the patient is sick," Sheffrin said of California's
electricity market. "It needs help [and] may die."
?????


Hugo, you can go ahead and remove me from the distribution list as I have
moved out of the controls group.  Good luck with everything, it has been
great working with you.


FYI - the only other temporary information I can give you is Thursday Feb 7. is simulation date (as per previous e-mail) and Monday, Feb. 11 is the current 'go live' date.  I'll try to keep you up to date with any changes.  If there is ANYTHING we think we have not done or will not complete by next Wednesday, Feb. 5 such as desk set ups, RisktRAC set up (including hierarchies), individual roll set ups, testing of Min's new DPR Automation, and anything else I may not be thinking of, please let me know as soon as possible, so we can get the right resources working on it.

Thanks,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nat, Steve
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:25 PM
To:	Will, Lloyd; White, Stacey W.; Allen, Thresa A.; Bentley, Corry; Imai, Rika
Cc:	Belden, Tim; Presto, Kevin M.; Webb, Jay; Henry, Jane Hilburn; Bailey, Debra
Subject:	UBS Data Migrations

I have received several questions from the floor regarding the subject topic.  Here is what I know as of 2:00 today.  This is an evolving process.  Please distribute this note as appropriate:

All movement of 'data' from Enron to UBS is subject to legal approval.  Legal is developing policy guidelines that will govern what and how much data individual users and the IT department can move.

Data can be defined as application data (source code, executables, scripts, etc...), business data (curves, prices, deals, weather forecasts, etc...), and office documents (spreadsheets, word files, etc...)

Data is housed in many different places, including desktop C drives, individual network H drives, common file servers (O/M/R/W drives), database servers, application servers, and web servers.

Several steps have already been completed:

The physical file server environments for UBS have been established.
The physical DB server environments for UBS have been established.
The physical application and web server environments for UBS have been established.
Some file server directories have already been copied.  This was limited to data (executables, risk excel sheets, etc...) necessary for IT to test our critical applications in the new UBS production environment.
Our large EnPower and TDS Oracle databases were also copied for application testing.

Where do we stand?

I am maintaining, and have distributed to this group, an inventory of all software and hardware components associated with our Power application portfolio.  The inventory includes specific common file server directories that are necessary for our Power apps to run.  We have received input from several business owners in this area.
Legal and IT are collaborating on a process for moving file server data. (H/O/M/R/W)  We are expecting a process definition within days, given our Day 0 target of February 6th.  (legal integration date)
At this time, it sounds like individual UBS employees will participate in identifying files on the various file server drives listed above and signing a document specifying that that data movement adheres to legal policy guidelines.  Individuals may even be asked to physically move (drag and drop) files from the old Enron drives to UBS holding drives.  This is still under discussion.
We have made some basic assumptions about the amount of business data to be moved to UBS.  I have provided Tim, Kevin, and Lloyd an overview of these assumptions.  This is also still under discussion.

I will schedule a meeting in the next couple of days to discuss this, and other transition issues, in more detail.

Thanks, Steve


Rudwell,  Attached is a redline of the guaranty with my comments.  Specifically they are:

	1.  I am OK with including reasonable attorney fees, but they must be included in the $2.5 million dollar cap.
	2.  The use of subtantially in Paragraph 2 seems redundant.  The notice requires reasonable detail.  To add subtantial compliance on top of that is redundant.

I am OK with the other changes.  Please review and let me know if you have any questions.


Please plan to attend a meeting tomorrow(2/1) at 11:30 a.m. in Greg's office.  This meeting is requested by David Oxley and it will be regarding Netco employment agreements.

Tim-You can just call Greg's polycom number-853-5202.

Thank you!

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile


hey can you pick me up at my house instead of work.  I would rather not leave
my car at work all weekend.


Pulpex Bulletin for Wednesday, November 28, 2001

Market News:
             Bid      Ask     Last     High      Low   Vol    OI
NBSK -----------------------------------------------------------
Dec01     394.00   400.00   394.00   394.00   394.00     1   134
Jan02     399.00   405.00        -        -        -     -   120
Feb02     404.00   412.00   404.00   404.00   404.00     5    39
Mar02     414.00   423.00   417.00   419.25   417.00    15   193
Jun02     437.00   456.00   437.25   437.25   437.00    35    73
Sep02     451.00   470.00   453.25   453.25   453.25    20    62
Dec02     461.00   472.00   465.00   465.00   465.00    10    15
Mar03     475.00   495.00        -        -        -     -     -

BEK ------------------------------------------------------------
Dec01     392.00   396.00        -        -        -     -    30
Dec01     395.00   405.00        -        -        -     -     -
Feb02     398.00   408.00        -        -        -     -     -
Mar02     355.00   418.00        -        -        -     -     -

Settlement Prices Futures
          Today      Chg      Prev
NBSK ------------------------------
Dec01    394.00     -4.00    398.00
Jan02    402.00     -1.00    403.00
Feb02    404.00     -8.00    412.00
Mar02    417.00     -5.00    422.00
Jun02    437.25     -0.75    438.00
Sep02    453.25     -1.75    455.00
Dec02    465.00     -4.00    469.00
Mar03    485.00     +2.00    483.00

BEK -------------------------------
Dec01    394.00     -3.50    397.50
Dec01    400.00     -4.00    404.00
Feb02    403.00     -5.00    408.00
Mar02    408.00     -5.00    413.00

The above tables should ideally be viewed using Courier or other fixed fonts.
During Pulpex opening hours (0830-1600 UK Time, 0930-1700 CET),prices
are distributed on our web page: http://www.pulpex.com

If you would like someone else to receive this bulletin or to cancel your own
please mail: info@pulpex.com or fax: +44 20 7065 8941


Thanks Justy, you're the best!

	Justin Boyd
	11/17/2000 02:33 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hi Tana - yes, I agree! TooToo J


Okey dokey.

From: Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 07:30 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate, Roseann
Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: LLC structure for power development

Enron may have a land lease with Project Co.  In NO event may the land be
burdened with low dollar hard costs/improvements - no materiality limits and
no hard costs allowed.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Bills, Lisa; Engeldorf, Roseann; Manis, Herman
Cc: Jacoby, Ben
Subject: LLC structure for power development

Question for the team:

If it appears that we may have land which may not be able to stay off balance
sheet, is it preferable to have the land held by a different LLC than the
project LLC, with a lease to the E-Next/OBS compliant project co?

If that is the case, what about the possibility of burdening the land with
some low dollar hard costs?  I don't have anything in particular in mind, it
is more of a theoretical question.

Thanks,

Kay


The EnronOnline guy responsible for the video is trying to get the contractor
we used to get these guys to stop using our name.  Louise may want us to
contact them if he is not successful.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000 09:57 AM -----

	Louise Kitchen
	07/05/2000 09:10 AM

		 To: David Pope/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Adam Tyrrell/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena
Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Macromedia site of the day-reference to EnronOnline

Unfortunately, they had nothing to do with EnronOnline.   It was a promo
video we can't use.

They were a company that was subcontracted out to do a promotional video for
EnronOnline.  The people we contracted with is the one Enron uses for all
videos - I believe are suing Hydrogen as the video is unusable.

Kal and legal are chasing.

David Pope
04/07/2000 05:23
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Dave
Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Adam
Tyrrell/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Macromedia site of the day-reference to EnronOnline

Hi all;

There is some coverage of Enron Online through a highlighted site of the day
on Macromedia.  A company called Hydrogen Interactive is highlighted, and one
of the highlighted claim to fames of Hydrogen is some work that they did for
Enron Online.  This should increase Enron exposure in the techworld as this
macromedia site is well followed.  Links below.

http://www.macromedia.com/showcase/
http://www.h-i.net/


This e-mail will confirm the site visit by your company at the three plants.
The relevant information is as follows:

Pursuant to the Site Visit Procedures sent you by CSFB, if you have not
already done so, please send me the following:
List of your team members and titles
For outside consultants, state their employer
Name, phone number (office and mobile) and e-mail address of your designated
deal team leader

Lastly, I will serve as the due diligence coordinator for the three plants,
handling all questions and responses.  Should you have any due diligence
questions or require copies of any oversized documents, please contact me at
713.853.7998.
Regards,
Ben


All,
A few of you might have been testifying at the FERC hearings in San Diego, I
know Jeff was, so you know that most people wanted FERC to "do something."
The
silver lining in that proposal is that our conference becomes more important.

Lee has decided on 12:30  to 6 pm on Monday November 13 so you can tell any
speakers you are inviting.  I think that's the best choice because it more
interesting to more people, and if they can do presidential debates in 2 hours
we should be able to address these issues in 6 hours.

Note that we have competition with another conference, see below.  We should
be
able to get better, higher profile speakers.  We need to get a list soon so we
can send out advertisements.  Please send updates to Lee and me.  Expect
another
message asking for reactions to a proposed next set of speakers to invite.  If
you want to be on a voluntary conference call addressing the next speakers,
followed by an even more optional discussion on logistics with Heather, tell
me
if Monday 9/18 at 5pm EDT/2 pm Pacific works for you.

Lee, if you want to send this to the other potential sponsors you're talking
to,
feel free.

Thanks!
Rob

 <<PMW conference.pdf>>

Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
gramlr@pjm.com

 - PMW conference.pdf


ETS Intranet Consolidation Project Updates (www.ETS.enron.com)
What is the status of the consolidation?

Completed Sites:
The core ETS Intranet Site, www.ets.enron.com
ETS Solution Center
http://www.ets.enron.com/Services/Solution_Center/default.htm
Self-Directed Task Force http://www.ets.enron.com/Services/SDWT/default.htm

Sites in Progress:
Safety Site http://www.ots.enron.com/safety/default.htm
Design and Records Management
Engineering Standards http://www.ots.enron.com/docs/stds/0000-1.htm

How will this consolidation affect me as a user? As we roll out new sites,
any bookmarks to the old sites will need to
be modified.  If you navigate to an old site, you will see a redirect message
requesting that you update your bookmarks and a link to the new site.

What are the next steps?
The Intranet team will be contacting Webmasters with content or applications
on the current ETS website (www.ots.enron.com)
to discuss the migration.  All content and applications on this web server
will be moved to the new ETS Intranet before the end of the 2nd quarter.

Questions
LaDonna Dervin is the project manager for the project and can be reached at
713.853.7103 if you have any questions regarding the project.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


Steve,

No problem.

Grant will speak in place, but RISK may not be aware of it yet.
You can just register as my guest.

Vince

Steven Leppard
03/03/2000 06:03 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Risk European Energy 2000

Hi Vince

Do you get your regular freebie "ticket" for the Risk conference in
Amsterdam?  (You know what I'm going to ask next...)  It looks like there's
some interesting stuff, and attending would certainly broaden my horizons.

Would you kindly consider bringing me along?

Cheers,
Steve


Jason,
	Below is the Border procedural change effective June 1st we talked
about.

						Jer

> ----------
> From: 	Willimon, Ted[SMTP:Ted.Willimon@ENRON.com]
> Sent: 	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:51 AM
> To: 	Adrienne Anderson (E-mail); Al Shaver (E-mail); Alan Campbell
> (E-mail); Andy James (E-mail); Andy Strickler (E-mail); Barb Russell
> (E-mail); Becky Fischer (E-mail); Bert Magstadt (E-mail); Bill Anderson
> (E-mail); Bill Hogue (E-mail); Bill Kickert (E-mail); Bill Putnam
> (E-mail); Bill Shields (E-mail); Bill Sticka (E-mail); Bill Straavaldson
> (E-mail); Bob Fleming (E-mail); Bob Johnson (E-mail); Brecke Houston
> (E-mail); Brenda Gaudet (E-mail); Brian Artz (E-mail); Brian Owens
> (E-mail); Bruce Webster (E-mail); Carol Bae (E-mail); Chad Van Delden
> (E-mail); Charlie Muzzy (E-mail); Chris Gowman (E-mail); Christine Hodge
> (E-mail); Colin Chapman (E-mail); Colin Strom (E-mail); Cory Empey
> (E-mail); Craig Fisher (E-mail); Dan Collins (E-mail); Darren Houser
> (E-mail); Darryll Fuentes (E-mail); Darwin Banash (E-mail); Dave Wear
> (E-mail); David Garza (E-mail); David Ostlund (E-mail); Debbie Isenburg
> (E-mail); Debbie Nichols (E-mail); Dennis Kluksdahl (E-mail); Dilshad
> Chagani (E-mail); Don Doll (E-mail); Don Klempel (E-mail); Don Mattheis
> (E-mail); Donna Burke (E-mail); Doris Jennings (E-mail); Doug Davis
> (E-mail); Doug MacLeod (E-mail); Drew Allan (E-mail); Dwayne Burton
> (E-mail); Eddie Thomas (E-mail); Elaine McCarthy (E-mail); Ellen Ingmire
> (E-mail); Eric Rodenburg (E-mail); Eva Zubel (E-mail); Fred Hunzeker
> (E-mail); Gas Control, MidAmerican (E-mail); Gay Lynn Lueder (E-mail);
> George Smith (E-mail); Gina Prazaan (E-mail); Gordon Woods (E-mail); Greg
> Cook (E-mail); Greg Edwards (E-mail); Gregory Padden (E-mail); Helen
> Anderson (E-mail); Irene Isais (E-mail); James Carr (E-mail); James Voss
> (E-mail); Janet Corritore (E-mail); Jason Moshier (E-mail); Jay Bauer
> (E-mail); Jay Bullock (E-mail); Jean Adams (E-mail); Jeff Nilan (E-mail);
> Jerry DeBeaumont (E-mail); Jerry Lanier (E-mail); Jerry Rodriguez
> (E-mail); Jerry Slechta (E-mail); Jim Carr (E-mail); Jim Hegg (E-mail);
> Jim Nielson (E-mail); Joan Warnestrum (E-mail); Jobie Duhacek (E-mail);
> Jodie Floyd (E-mail); Joe Clements (E-mail); John Childers (E-mail); John
> Crumley (E-mail); John Kamprud (E-mail); John Martin (E-mail); John
> Paganis (E-mail); Judy Rubsam (E-mail); Judy Weakly (E-mail); Julie
> Arbuckle (E-mail); Julie Reichle (E-mail); Karen Bothwell (E-mail); Karen
> Raymond (E-mail); Keith Clauson (E-mail); Kelly Aitken (E-mail); Kelly Yu
> (E-mail); Ken Finch (E-mail); Kevin Asman (E-mail); Kevin Connell
> (E-mail); Kevin Heal (E-mail); Kim Wetzel (E-mail); Kimery Sands (E-mail);
> Kristi Barbee (E-mail); Leatha Russell (E-mail); Leo Williams (E-mail);
> Linda Sonnleitner (E-mail); Lisa Coultry (E-mail); Liz Burdick (E-mail);
> Lois Coots (E-mail); Marco Marchitelli (E-mail); Maria Dickerson (E-mail);
> Mary Hanford (E-mail); Mary Shockley (E-mail); Meikyn Shuler (E-mail);
> Michel Scott (E-mail); Midwestern (E-mail); Nancy Hunter (E-mail); NBPL
> (E-mail); Nick Richardson (E-mail); Nikki Simpson (E-mail); Pam Dunn
> (E-mail); Paul Michael (E-mail); Peggy Hedstrom (E-mail); Raulando DeLara
> (E-mail); Ray Jager (E-mail); Ria White (E-mail); Rich Gebauer (E-mail);
> Richard Bryan (E-mail); Rick Ramsey (E-mail); Rick Sekida (E-mail); Robet
> Bryan (E-mail); Robin Martin (E-mail); Rod Bartlow (E-mail); Roger Tisdale
> (E-mail); Sandra Stewart (E-mail); Sandy Meyers (E-mail); Sarah Goerner
> (E-mail); Schedulers WBI (E-mail); Scheduling, Foothills (E-mail); Scott
> Coburn (E-mail); Scott Marshall (E-mail); Scott Wirges (E-mail); Shawn
> Davis (E-mail); Shawnette Sonnier (E-mail); Sheila Jangula (E-mail);
> Sheila Nacey (E-mail); Sherrie Palmer (E-mail); Sherry Anderson (E-mail);
> Stephen Heard (E-mail); Steve January (E-mail); Steve Phillips (E-mail);
> Steve Richman (E-mail); Stuart Neck (E-mail); Susan Adams (E-mail); Susan
> Jones (E-mail); Ted Willimon (E-mail); Teri Tissington (E-mail); Terry
> Altenbaumer (E-mail); Terry Wisner (E-mail); Begley Mark (E-mail); Bryan
> Robert (E-mail); Colin Strom (E-mail); Robert johnson (E-mail)
> Subject: 	FW: Borderline
>
>  <<Borderline2001-02.doc>>
>
>
>
>
> > Attached is the Borderline describing the June 1 procedural changes.
> > Thanks, NBPL
> >
> >  <<Borderline2001-02.doc>>
> >
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Borderline2001-02.doc


Susan,
Please let me know if this gets approved? furthermore, I would like to see the Tariff to see if the changes will affect our business.

Thanks
Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Susan
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 6:25 PM
To:	Ader, Jeff; Bernstein, Mark; Broderick, Paul J.; Brown, Michael; Burnett, Lisa; Campbell, Larry F.; Davis, Mark Dana; Dorland, Chris; Dutta, Tom; Fromer, Howard; Gilbert, Gerald; Gordon, Joe; Guillaume, David; Gupta, Gautam; Hoatson, Tom; Llodra, John; Martinez, Posey; May, Tom; Miller, Jeffrey; Misra, Narsimha; Plauche, Shelley; Quenet, Joe; Scheuer, Janelle; Stalford, Robert; Stepenovitch, Joe; Stewart, Jennifer N.; Thomas, Paul D.; Wood, George
Cc:	Fulton, Donna; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	NYISO filing (ER01-3001-000)

On September 4, 2001, the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) filed revisions to amend Attachment F of the NYISO Market Administration and Control Area Services Tariff to extend the duration of its currently effective $1,000/MWh Bid Caps on certain NYISO-administered markets; and amend Attachment Q to the NYISO's Open Access Transmission Tariff and Attachment E of the ISO Services Tariff to extend its Temporary Extraordinary Procedures for Correcting Market Design Flaws and Addressing Transitional Abnormalities.

If you need further information please let me know.

Susan
x30596


Thank you very much.

Do we know if they intend to apply the guaranty to the account same day or
will that take some time?

Since the guaranty is on ECI, and we are doing the assignment and assumption
is it fair to assume the account might have to renamed/positions transfered
to some new account before they will give us relief?

Sheila,

Are we going to flip out the Morgan account straight to the ECI entity?  Will
this delay the split?

Thanks,

Tom

03/28/2001 02:50 PM
Cheryl Nelson
Cheryl Nelson
Cheryl Nelson
03/28/2001 02:50 PM
03/28/2001 02:50 PM
Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Hello Team,

I have good news.  Clem Abrams approved the guaranty and will have it
executed first thing tomorrow.  (None of the requisite officers are in today).

I am still contacting Bear Stearns every couple of hours to get the final
drafts of the agreements in our hands.  I'll keep you posted.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	03/28/2001 10:21 AM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/ENRON@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Sheila and Tom need to know the status.  Please advise them mid-day.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	03/28/2001 10:04 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Hi Sara and Sheila,

By way of update, I was able to get the guaranty to Clem and am working on
his getting it back to me by the end of the day.  I talked to Bear Stearn's
lawyer today about whether we could get the other agreements (account and
assignment) executed today and she represented that (1) she is still waiting
for her Managing Director's approval of her final draft in order to forward
it to me (2) but that she is working with me to check in with the MD every
hour or so for a status update.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	03/27/2001 06:59 PM

		 To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Wednesday, March 28 is the target execution date for the ECI customer
agreement and assignment (from ENA) of the Securities Loan Agreement/credit
book.  I am not certain if Cheryl was able to expedite delivery of the new
ENE guaranty.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Sheila Glover
	03/27/2001 02:10 AM

		 To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT
		 Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Tom,
The day i received this I responded to Sara and cc'd richard that I was okay
with transferring the Stock Loan Agreement from ENA to ECI.  The ENA was
executed and the ECI piece is what is in process.

Sara,
Any update?  How far are we away from exectution?  Do you need anything from
anyone?

Thanks. Sheila

Tom Doukas@ENRON
03/26/2001 11:59 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate@ECT,
Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Just wanted to follow up to see if we have a time frame as to when the letter
will be fully executed.

Thanks,

Tom

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 03/22/2001 08:41 AM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate,
Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Here's a recap for everyone.
Our original negotiation with Bear (for the Securities Loan Agreement) was in
the name of ENA, and, ENA had an existing account agreement with Bear.
However, Bear insisted that the account agreement was "too old" and that we
negotiate a new agreement.  I agreed on the condition that this not hold up
execution of the Securities Loan Agreement.  We have one or two final points
remaining on the new account agreement which we'll execute for both ENA and
Enron Credit Inc.. ("ECI").  We have the authorized trader list for ECI and
are waiting for Richard to designate the new officer/director slate but we
are prepared for execution by the existing officers in London.  The
assignment instrument will be very short for transferring the ECI book from
ENA to ECI.  It will take only a few days to replace the existing ENE
guaranty for the Securities Loan Agreement.

Jeff and Sheila:  Please verify that both ENA and ECI do not  need the
Securities Loan Agreement.  I believe it is just ECI and we can transfer the
existing agreement to ECI.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	03/21/2001 12:28 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: BEAR Guarantee letter

Sara,

I just spoke with Russ Miron from Bear Sterans regarding our Guaranty to
Reduce funding to 20% per side.

I had asked him about when they will be executing the agreement.  He said
that his lawyers are ready to sign but are under the impression that you have
one remaining point to resolve and that this point is holding up the
finalization of the agreement.

Is there an issue from our side?  If not we should be able to get this
execution taken care of immediately?

Thanks,

Tom
713-853-9074


Spoke with Stockman

Port - 		Mike will be down Monday and wants to handle this. Wants a appropriate hand over.
Hayden -	30/30 plus whatever we had I offer letter
Gorny -		30/30 as above
Naveen -	30/30 check whether he already had a contract?
Nelson -	20/20 as Gorny/Hayden.

Lets see if we can get docs finalized Monday.

David
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 12:07 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie; Fitzpatrick, Amy; Curless, Amanda
Cc:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Update from 11:30am Commitee Meeting

Redmond - Approved to go to 175/175 but only after Louise/Lavo speak with him.
Frihart - Approved in principle but preference is for Calger/Vickers to leave $85k s/o in and reduce $105/$105 to $50/$50.
Brysch - increase to 75/75 approved.
Lambie - is a probable no, not a verbal yes.
Oh - Approved at 75/75
Biever - Approved at 20/20
Drozdiak - approved at 20/20
Steffes - Whalley to call. Is at 100/100, for some reason Steffes thought it was 200/200!
Port - should be withdrawn
Gorny - draft as replacement to Port 50/50 contract (I need to approved with Stockman)
Hayden - draft contract at 50/50 as above.
Sweeney - Has declined in principle therefore do not proceed.

David


The following schedule has been distributed as noted regarding publishing the
DPR over the next two weeks.  I know that books run in Calgary, Houston, and
Portland will be calculated and officialized on Friday, December 22nd for
trading that day.  The current plan is not to publish the DPR for December
22nd on Tuesday, December 26th, but to wait until the first Enron official
business day to do so (i.e. Wednesday, December 27th).  That will work as
long as trading results for Friday, December 22nd are not dramatic.

Please leave a voice mail message after calcing the books on Friday, December
22nd for Chris Abel (x33102) to give him trading results by commodity for
December 22nd.  If there are dramatic results, Chris may produce a
preliminary and rough DPR on Tuesday, December 26th with the information that
you provide.  For locations that will not calc and officialize books on
Friday, December 22nd, you will still need to contact Chris to give him your
best estimate of trading results.

Thanks for your continuing help in providing timely and accurate information
for the worldwide trading organization.  I hope that all of you enjoy your
holidays.

---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 11:31 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           12/19/2000 11:22 AM

To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Publication Schedule for DPR During Holiday Period

Please note the following schedule for risk book reporting during the holiday
period:

Trade Date Enron Status NYMEX  Equity Market Consolidated Risk Reporting

Fri, 12/22 Open Early Close Open DPR published for 12/21 results (a)

Mon, 12/25 Holiday (b) Closed Closed DPR not published

Tues, 12/26 Holiday (b) Open Open DPR not published (c)

Wed, 12/27 Open Open Open DPR published separately for 12/22 & 12/26
    results

Thurs, 12/28 Open  Open Open DPR published for 12/27 results

Fri, 12/29 Open Early Close Open DPR published for 12/28 results (a)

Mon, 1/1 Holiday (b) Closed Closed DPR not published

Tues, 1/2 Open Open Open DPR published for 12/29.  Normal month
    end schedule applies. (d)

(a) Trader P&L and Position reports will be produced for traded products at
close of business
(b) US, Canadian & London holiday
(c) Logistics and risk personnel will be in the office on this holiday to
support trading activity
(d) Monthly close procedures require that changes or adjustments to risk
books for month-end be submitted by 5:00 pm Houston time on the first
business day following the end of the month.  The DPR published on 1/2 for
12/29 results will be preliminary.  The final DPR for 12/29 should be
published on 1/3, assuming that all month-end adjustments have been received
on 1/2.


Mark,

I attach an e-mail which I have just received from the OMNLX setting out the
extent to which they have been able to agree our amendments to the IP
Licences.

Basically, they have agreed to everything, EXCEPT a limitation of liability
clause protecting us in the event of a breach of the OM Click Trade Agreement.

I do not see how they will move on this as this is the second time that they
have refused it ( they have agreed to put one in the OMNet Agreement however
- which is slightly perverse).

Anyway, you will see that they require Enron to sign these by Friday of this
week!!

If you can see your way to approving these documents - I think that we have
got 99 % of what we required and hence they are ok -- I can get the OMLX to
e-mail clean copies directly to you for signature.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Elliott/LON/ECT on 05/10/99 05:52 PM
---------------------------

Mark Elliott
05/10/99 05:48 PM
To: susan.gill@omgroup.com
cc:
Subject: Re: ENRON electronic agreements

Many thanks, Susan - I have forwarded these on to Legal Dept in Houston with
my recommendations.

I shall let you know when Houston Legal gives me their approval to the
documents so that you can e-mail them directly to Houston Legal.

Kind regards

Mark

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  susan.gill@omgroup.com                           05/10/99 06:20 PM

To: melliott@enron.co.uk
cc: paul.scott@omgroup.com, knut.lillienau@omgroup.com,
peter.akesson@omgroup.com (bcc: Mark Elliott/LON/ECT)
Subject: ENRON electronic agreements

Dear Mark,

I have just heard from Stockholm. Please find attached the agreements marked
up
with the amendments in so far as we are able to agree to them. I think we have
been able to accomodate the principles behind your requested amendments
detailed
in your email of 30th April.

I understand that the line installation has been ordered for this Friday -
before the line can be installed I will need 2 signed copies of the OMnet
agreement returned. Please let me know re emailing the engrossments to you.

Many thanks

Susan

Click

(See attached file: Click NT Member .doc)(See attached file: fees click
member.doc)

OMnet

(See attached file: OMnet Agreement.doc)(See attached file: Fees omnet
Member.doc)

Side Agreement

(See attached file: Side Agreement.doc)

 - Click NT Member .doc
 - fees click member.doc
 - OMnet Agreement.doc
 - Fees omnet Member.doc
 - Side Agreement.doc


The loss was due to rest of month Transco Zone 6 basis.


Make-up soccer game--I must go, it's William's first of the season.  I
promise they are all not early games!  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Today's Hottest Travel Deals from Bestfares.com!

Last week, we had one heck of a sale. This week, we are having a monster of a sale. If you're planning on flying to Europe, not only will we give you a free stopover in London, but we will also throw in two free hotel nights in London with airfares starting at $218 roundtrip. Yes, we said $218 roundtrip including hotel. How about a four-night Mexican Baja cruise from $149 per person? Yes, that's $149 per person. Our 30 European destinations from $349 roundtrip for March and April departures have been extended. Our $178 roundtrip or less coast-to-coast sale for travel through June 7, 2002 is back, and from select U.S. cities, we'll throw in a free stopover in Las Vegas or Phoenix. How about airfares to Florida from $72 roundtrip? We have Mexican beaches on sale through February 28, 2002. Plus, we have the South Pacific on sale through June 30, 2002. Check out our monster sale fares listed below. Visit our Main News Desk at <http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/desk.asp?desk=news> for travel news or visit Quickfare Finder for your best travel option at <http://quickfares.bestfares.com/quickfare/qfsearch.jsp>

CAN YOU BELIEVE 2 FREE HOTEL NIGHTS IN LONDON, A FREE STOPOVER IN LONDON & AIRFARES STARTING AT $218 RT?

Talk about a cheap date. Two free hotel nights in London, plus you can visit up to 45 European destinations and receive a free stopover in London. Travel is valid for departures through April 6, 2002 and return travel must be completed by May 5, 2002. Now you can stopover for a few days in London and we'll throw in a two-night stay in a three-star hotel for free. Fly to Amsterdam or Paris from $285 roundtrip and you can stop in London and get the two nights hotel for free. If you want more bang for your buck, don't miss this very rare offer which includes many extras for no extra cost. For full details, visit <http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=50737>
P.S. If you want to fly to London only, airfare with two free nights hotel starts at $218 roundtrip. Wow!

EXTENDED! FLY TO 30 EUROPEAN DESTINATIONS MARCH, APRIL OR MAY FOR $349 RT--WOW!

You have five more days to save hundreds of dollars off the current sale fares to your choice of 30 European destinations. Depart by May 31, 2002 from New York City, Newark, Washington (DC) or Boston to 30 European destinations including Paris, Amsterdam, Athens, Prague, Zurich, Rome, Milan, Madrid, Barcelona, Istanbul, London and many more for only $349 roundtrip. From Los Angeles, Miami or Chicago, the fare is only $449 roundtrip. For $100 more roundtrip, you can travel between June 1 and August 3, 2002. We have already sold out of our allotment of seats from Miami for June, July and August. Our seats are selling fast and seats on some dates, especially in the summer are becoming very scarce. Be flexible on travel dates, act fast and save a bundle. For these great fares, visit <http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=50230>
P.S. If you have frequent flyer tickets, you might want to consider flying to the nearest gateway for these savings.

FLY COAST-TO-COAST FOR $178 RT OR LESS + A FREE STOPOVER IN LAS VEGAS OR PHOENIX THROUGH JUNE 7, '02

This is the first time this year that we have been able to offer our (most popular) free stopover in Las Vegas of Phoenix program for travel through June 7, 2002. From select U.S. markets, you can visit two cities for less than the price of one. Visit <http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=50230>
You can also fly between 58 U.S. cities through June 7, 2002 for $178 roundtrip or less. Visit Quickfare Finder so we can show you so many options for this sale at <http://quickfares.bestfares.com/quickfare/qfsearch.jsp>

A 4-NIGHT MEXICAN BAJA CRUISE FROM $149 PER PERSON--GIVE ME A BREAK

Let's see, for less than $40 a night, you can sail the Mexican Baja. Give me a break! But, it's true. This is just one of the many short notice cruises that you can find at www.cheapcruises.com. For $199 per person, you can go on a three-night Bahamian cruise, and for $399 per person, you can go on a seven-night eastern Caribbean cruise. Of course the cabins are not the best on the ship, but it's a starting point. Usually, for $50 to $100 more, you can upgrade to an outside cabin. With our cheap airfares to all of the ports including New Orleans, Fort Lauderdale, Tampa, Houston (Galveston), Los Angeles or San Juan, why not take a cruise? This could be one of the best travel values for 2002. Visit <http://www.cheapcruises.com> or call 800-244-7447.

HOTEL RESERVATIONS NETWORK

Need a hotel room? Look no further because HotelDiscounts.com is the place to find great deals at great prices. HotelDiscounts.com provides up to 70 percent off on hotels in major cities worldwide with guaranteed lowest rates. Book online at <http://www.hoteldiscounts.com/cgi-bin/pickcity?SID=NW2&LKF=NW2>

37 U.S. CITIES TO FLORIDA FROM $72 RT THROUGH FEB. 14, '02

Need to thaw out on a cheap buck? Think Florida. Fly from many southern and East Coast cities for only $72-$89 roundtrip to Jacksonville, Orlando, Tampa, Fort Lauderdale or West Palm Beach. From other cities such as Boston, New York City, Chicago, Detroit and Cleveland, you pay only $108 roundtrip. All travel must be completed by February 14, 2002. Check out all of our super cheap airfares to sunny Florida at <http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=50887>

BUSINESS CLASS AIRFARE TO EUROPE FROM $1,539 RT + A FREE DOMESTIC OR CARIBBEAN TICKET WHEN YOU RETURN

Most major airlines sell a Business Class ticket from New York City, Boston, Atlanta or Washington (DC) to Europe for a whopping $7,000-$8,000 roundtrip. For the next three months (through March 31, 2002), your cost for a Business Class ticket from over 30 East Coast cities to your choice of Paris, Amsterdam, Rome, Madrid, Frankfurt or Munich is only $1,539 roundtrip. You can fly into one city, visit Europe by train, and return from another city. From the Midwest, your Business Class fares starts at $1,700 roundtrip including Dallas, Houston or Chicago. From the West Coast, including San Diego, Phoenix, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Las Vegas or Seattle, your roundtrip Business Class ticket starts as low as $1,659. As an added bonus, you will receive 15,000 additional airmiles for the trip, giving you enough airmiles for at least a free domestic ticket when you return. From many cities you will earn enough airmiles for a free Caribbean ticket. Why not fly in the front cabin like a king or queen this winter, save up to 75 percent off and get that free domestic or Caribbean ticket when you return? Visit <http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=50456>

SYDNEY OR AUCKLAND FROM $809 RT THROUGH JUNE 7, '02

Now you can fly to the South Pacific for as low as $809 roundtrip through June 7, 2002. To qualify for the lowest fare, you must depart between May 1 and May 31, 2002. For approximately $100 more, you can depart between March 1 and April 30, 2002; and for approximately $100 more, you can depart between January 24 and February 28, 2002. Travel to Auckland is available starting February 14, 2002. This is our first major sale to the South Pacific for 2002. Check out our special section. You could save up to $300. For fares to Auckland, Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, visit <http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=49466>

You are currently subscribed to hotdeals as ebass@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-hotdeals-1324881S@hotdeals.bestfares.com <mailto:leave-hotdeals-1324881S@hotdeals.bestfares.com>

Copyright 2001 by Bestfares USA Inc. All rights reserved.


Tom,

FYI. I hope to meet Nick Bambos this weekend.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000
08:28 AM ---------------------------

Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 02/22/2000 12:54:15 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: Ravi.Thuraisingham.Enron_Communications@enron.com, gappy@stanford.edu
Subject: Stanford Meeting

Dear Vince,

Giuseppe tells me that you will be visiting Stanford soon
and you you would like to meet with me. I would definitely
be glad to meet you and talk further.

Would you please let me know about the time of your visit
and your availability to meet. I look forward to seeing you.

Best Regards,

Nick

PS: Giuseppe and Amy came back very impressed by you are doing at Enron!
Thanks for hosting them.


I am fine with this.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zipper, Andy
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:37 PM
To:	Piper, Greg
Subject:	.

 << File: EnronOnline origination.doc >>


Ike, it is unfortunate we could not make this work yesterday; but I
understand your position.  In the interest of facilitating continuing
dialogue and perhaps giving you our view on how we analyze such positions, I
will send you our document.  I would suggest that we try to set up a follow
up meeting in early October once you have completed your work.

Regards
Dave Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
08:44 AM ---------------------------

"Zeringue,Oswald J" <ojzeringue@tva.gov> on 09/27/2000 04:02:13 PM
To: "'David.W.Delainey@Enron.com'" <David.W.Delainey@Enron.com>
cc: "'kay.chapman@enron.com'" <kay.chapman@Enron.com>
Subject: Settlement

Dave

Thanks for your September 25 email.  TVA is currently developing the numbers
we agreed to share in our meeting last week, but given the importance of
this effort, TVA is going to need additional time.  Trying to complete the
task by this afternoon did not prove feasible.  We can, however, have this
information ready by October 13.

I will give you a call to discuss a mutually satisfactory method for
exchanging the information.

Regards
Ike Zeringue


Dan:

I would like to understand your business strategy.  I am asking my assistant
to work out a time.

Mark

	Daniel Reck
	01/29/2001 09:55 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jody Underwood/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Freight Trading

Mark:

As you know, we are going to start trading freight capacity this year.  We
are building a team of Enron insiders and outsiders and I would like the sr.
staff to understand how and why we insist on using our contractual concepts
(e.g. make them look financial, limit liability, avoid litigation, etc.).
Sean Cumerland (formerly CALME), Chris Kravas (CEO of WebModal) and I are
going to meet February 7-9 at the Houstonian.  I am inviting you, Joe
Deffner, Wes Coldwell, Vince Kaminski and Rick Buy to meet with us for an
hour or so to communicate how your area integrates with the commercial
businesses.  In addition, I think it will be helpful for you to hear about
our plans to build the freight business.

Please let me know what time, if any, works for you on those days.

Thanks,

Dan Reck
x3-7445


(See attached file: HPLN1028.xls)

 - HPLN1028.xls


You need to decide.  It is your free dinner!

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 08/31/2000 12:46:14 PM
To: eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc: Shanna Husser <Shanna.Husser@ENRON.com>
Subject: saturday

Hi guys. We have 7 p.m. reservations @ C&H and  at Sweetwater Country Club.
Any preferences? The dress is the same @ both,  causal. See you @ our home,
say 5:30 or 6? Let me know.  Love-Dad


I probably won't be able to go.  Could we send 2 people??
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2000 07:31
PM ---------------------------

Molly LaFuze
01/10/2000 03:59 PM
To: VCoen@CNGT.CNG.com
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TTT WORKSHOP

PLEASE SIGN ME UP TO ATTEND:
Houston-The Westin Oaks  January 20, 2000 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
THANKS - MOLLY


Reminder
The Enron Oral History Project Continues...

"Using History to Help Enron Become the World's Leading Company"

How can an understanding of strategic choices, regulatory change and
corporate culture help Enron achieve its vision?

Speaker:
Joseph Pratt, Cullen Professor of History and Business, University of Houston
and
 Co-Director, Enron Oral History Project

Thursday, June 7
11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
EB 5C2

To Make a Reservation, Call 3-1941 and Select Option 1

Lunch will not be provided, but you are welcome to bring your own.

Please inform us ahead of time if you need special accommodations to
participate in this meeting.  Call 3-9390.