---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 08/30/2000 10:43
AM ---------------------------

John Woodman
08/30/2000 10:29 AM
To: Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES, Ronald G
Mentan/SFO/EES@EES, Brian Dafferner/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Detina/HOU/EES@EES,
Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES,
Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Persson/HOU/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin
Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Jeanette Reese/HOU/EES@EES,
Greg Nikkel/HOU/EES@EES, Peter Vint/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Juden/HOU/EES@EES,
Melinda Winn/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Nicole
Lauzier/HOU/EES@EES, Lily Guerra/HOU/EES@EES, Penny R Marksberry/HOU/EES@EES,
Joseph Alamo/SFO/EES@EES, Joey Morrow/HOU/EES@EES, Carole Nachtigall/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Leticia Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Gibbins/HOU/EES@EES, Kelly Lacalli/HOU/EES@EES, Teresa Seilheimer/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: San Diego Article

This was an article from the San Diego Tribune 8/29.


Thank you very much Jean.  I apreciate it.


Claudio.

Who was the professor who came up with the request?

Vince

	From:  Claudio Ribeiro @ ENRON                           11/20/2000 05:04 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: MIT Financial Engineering Pro-Seminar

Vince,

I have received a call from MIT asking if Enron would be interested in
sponsoring a Financial Engineering Pro-Seminar.

This means that Enron would propose a problem that would have its solution
developed by students in the Financial Engineering Track. These students
would present the findings in the end.

I think that Enron has already sponsored a Financial Engineering Pro-Seminar.
I remember something about Real Options at the time I was at school.

Please, let me know if Enron has the interest, specifically the Research.

Talking here at the Weather Desk, Mark Tawney expressed interest. If you
agree, we (the Weather Desk) could co-sponsor this Pro-Seminar with the
Research. The idea, then, would be to propose a problem connected to Weather
Trading.

Please, give me your thoughts about this issue.

Thanks,

Claudio


This draft looks ok to me.  Just to make sure the logic is being transmitted
to the authors of the communiques, we obvioiusly need to get a pop for the
investment community from selling assets and increasing return on equity.  At
the same time we need to communicate to partners, customers and regulators
that Enron is still there, which is the basis for some of our contracts and
concessions.  This dual benefit is the main conceptual value in the summer
deal, if it is done, and needs to guide our communication strategy which will
inevitably involve the same message going to investors as goes to our
counterparts in the markets in question.
,---------------------- Forwarded by James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/03/2000 10:14 AM ---------------------------

Miguel Padron@ENRON
08/02/2000 01:20 PM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New Summer Release

See attachment...please provide feedback.  Miguel
---------------------- Forwarded by Miguel Padron/SA/Enron on 08/02/2000
02:20 PM ---------------------------

Karen Denne
08/02/2000 11:29 AM
To: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis
Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith Miceli/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Johan Zaayman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES,
Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aaron Brown/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Miguel
Padron/SA/Enron@Enron, Janie Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: New Summer Release

The attached draft press release incorporates IR's comments.


I changed the deal to DYNEGYMARAND.

Thanks,  Errol

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Julie Brewer                           03/14/2001 02:33 PM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: EOL Deal

Errol-

Deal Number QW8614.3 was put in manually as a trade with Dynegy Canada.
However, I looked in Enron Online and it says that the counterparty is Dynegy
Marketing and Trade.

Thanks.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Sacks, Edward
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:33 AM
Subject:	RE: Contact Info

Since changes may be in store for ENE, I wanted to pass along the following contact information.

Ed Sacks
15603 Stiller Park Dr.
Cypress, TX 77429
(281) 225-9669 (home)
(281) 932-6551 (cell)
(713) 345-7712 (work)
edward_sacks@yahoo.com


Get Approved for an Unsecured Gold Credit Card Instantly Online! <http://r1.adversend.com/?u=319&l=5&id=4199108>

Get Approved for an Unsecured Gold Credit Card Instantly Online! <http://r1.adversend.com/?u=319&l=5&id=4199108>

Now you can get Guaranteed instant online Approval for an Unsecured Gold Credit Card with a $5,000 credit line. That's right!!! As long as you are at least 18, a U.S resident with at least $800 in monthly household income and are not currently in bankruptcy, your APPROVAL IS GUARANTEED! Enjoy great merchandise while improving your credit because the USA Gold Card reports your good credit to all three major bureaus.

We want to help you establish or reestablish your credit today!

Don't wait any longer - Apply Online Today and get the credit you deserve!  <http://r1.adversend.com/?u=319&l=5&id=4199108>
Sincerely,
Your New Offers Department
  _____

TO UNSUBSCRIBE enter your email address below and click REMOVE

OR...   REPLY <mailto:hotwebcash@remove.adversend.com> to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
This email was sent to: kevin.presto@ubswenergy.com


Sounds good.

> Subject: Good Advice to Protect Yourself
>
>
> > ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> > > >
> > Hi,
> > >
> > >This came from my sister in-law and thought I'd pass the info on to
you.
> This is what she sent.
> > >
> > >I learned a computer trick today that's really ingenious in it's
> simplicity.
> > >
> > >As you may know, when/if a worm virus gets into your computer it heads
> straight for your e-mail address book and sends itself to everyone in
there,
> thus infecting all your friends and associates.
> > >
> > >This trick won't keep the virus from getting into your computer, but it
> will stop it from using your address book to spread further, and it will
> alert you to the fact that the worm has gotten into your system.
> > >
> > >Here is what you do:  First, open your address book and click on "new
> contact" or "new person" just as you would do if you were adding a new
> friend to your list of e-mail addresses.  In the window where you would
type
> your friends FIRST name, type in !000 (that's an exclamation mark followed
> by 3 zeros).  In the window below where it prompts you to enter the new
> e-mail address, type in Worm Alert.  Then complete everything by clicking
> add, enter, OK, etc.
> > >
> > >Now, here is what you've done and why it works: the "name" !000 will be
> placed at the top of your address book as entry # 1.  This will be where
the
> worm will start in an effort to send itself to all your friends.
> > >
> > >But when it tries to send itself to !000, it will be undeliverable
> because of the phony e-mail address you entered (Worm Alert).  If the
first
> attempt fails (which it will because of the phony address), the worm goes
no
> further and your friends will not be infected.
> > >
> > >Here is the second great advantage of this method: If an e-mail cannot
be
> delivered, you will be notified of this in your "Inbox" almost
immediately.
> > >
> > >Hence, if you ever get an e-mail telling you that an e-mail addressed
to
> Worm Alert could not be delivered, you know right away that you have the
> worm virus in your system.  You can then take steps to get rid of it!
> > >
> > >Pretty slick huh?  It's worth a try.
> > >
> > >If everybody you know does this then you need not ever worry about
> opening e-mail from friends.  Pass this on to all your friends.
> > >
> > >RSVP  Himself
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>


Effective March 1st, I moved the volumes on deal 377268 (Non NY sale to New
Power) to deal 643754 (sale to New Power at WGL on CGAS).  Please correct the
hedge information.

I also created deal 643761 (sale to New Power at WGL on CGAS).  I believe
this deal is in the index book but does not show up in Sitara.  I believe it
was originally a Z6 Non Ny sale to New Power also.

Let me know if you have any questions.

thanks


Paul/Alan,

We need to have someone check into the legal issues associated with our
trading equities in each of the respective countries we are interested in
trading.  We need to get rulings on shares, futures and options for both
exchange traded and over the counter activity for each country.  This
"research" should be performed in much the same way as when we began trading
in Australia.  Some of the countries involved may have already been "green
lighted" a few years ago.  The countries we need to look into initially are:

Germany
France
Italy
Norway
Netherlands
Spain
United Kingdom

Once we get feedback on these countries we should continue on to secondary
countries which include:

Austria
Belgium
Denmark
Ireland
Israel
Sweden
Switzerland
Portugal
Turkey

I will leave up to yourselves to decide where this project should be
coordinated from but as we are a US coporate and ECT Investments, the
principal booking entity, is a US entity I would imagine it should be handled
from the States.  Please let me know if anyone has any questions or would
like to discuss issues associated with this request.

Thanks and regards,
John


---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
02:42 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Mayfield
12/12/2000 02:01 PM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

A nice note from Anne . . .

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
01:33 PM ---------------------------

alkinder@att.net on 12/09/2000 02:11:25 PM
To: kathy.mayfield@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

Kathy, what a wonderful idea!  My thanks to you and
everyone at ENRON.
Anne Lamkin Kinder


Thanks.  Can I email this in the morning?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frank, Carole
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	Grigsby, Mike; Ermis, Frank
Subject:	letter of recommendation

Just a quick note to remind you about the letter or recommendation for the Analyst Program.  If you would, please have your admin. put the letter on letterhead since Jeff Davis has asked for a hard copy.  Have a great weekend!

Carole Frank


The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney
work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the Systems Administrator at admin@pkns.com and immediately delete this
message from your system.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from mail1.dsmo.com ([208.237.44.166]) by PKNS.COM; Tue, 05 Jun
2001 14:43:52 -0700
Received: from 172.16.1.207 by mail1.dsmo.com with ESMTP (Tumbleweed MMS SMTP
Relay (MMS v4.7)); Tue, 05 Jun 2001 17:45:31 -0400
X-Server-Uuid: ea418ed0-eef0-11d3-b2e8-00a024e9ff30
Received: by EXDC with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <MJHDGG9R>;
Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:45:31 -0400
Message-ID: <C170490E40FAD1118DD900805FA7335F03FBFC66@EXCHANGEDC1>
From: "Kleinman, Joel" <KleinmanJ@dsmo.com>
To: "'alex.goldberg@williams.com'" <alex.goldberg@williams.com>,
"'zack.starbird@southernenergy.com'" <zack.starbird@southernenergy.com>,
tpg@stevensandoconnell.com
cc: cjs@stevensandoconnell.com, mmolland@brobeck.com,
tim.muller@williams.com, mlk@pkns.com
Subject: Conversation with Larry Drivon
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:45:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-WSS-ID: 17038D71673402-01-02
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=iso-8859-1

Larry and I spoke for ten minutes earlier this afternoon.  The subpoenas
have been authorized for the five generators plus Enron.  They will be
identical to the request of April 5.  They will issue in "a couple of days."
I declined to accept service for Duke, but requested a copy by fax (which he
will provide).  The subpoena provides 15 days for response.

Regarding protective order, Larry "hates to say there is no flexibility," bu
there is "not much."  Disclosure to the Attorney General is just one of a
number of issues.  It is very unlikely that we could negotiate from the
draft order we provided to the Committee.  He suggested that we revisit the
form of "agreement" he offered a month ago, but I told him that Duke
individually (and, I believed, others as well) had rejected that notion.  I
also deflected his suggestion that we revisit the notion of a "Sacramento
depository."

I then inquired whether they are stil interested in working our way through
the paragraphs of the subpoena.  I suggested that knowing what the Committee
wants might be useful in addressing protective order issues with a court.
Larry responded that he had anticipated doing that on May 3, but time did
not permit.  He thinks we should see whether we can put requests into three
piles: "yes," "no" and "lets fight."  I told him that some might be
legitimately pessimistic, given the fact that the Committee reneged on its
commitments regarding a protective order, but that I would pass the
information on.

I think we need a further conference call.  We should decide whether to
avail ourselves of the opportunity to discuss the subjects first before we
address confidentiality.  Please check the circulation list on this email,
and forward as you think appropriate.

Joel Kleinman

============================================================================Th
is e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may
contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for
delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you
have received this communication in error, and any review, use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this
e-mail message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original
message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@dsmo.com

Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP
http://www.legalinnovators.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001
10:04 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/23/2001 09:47 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/23/01


Applied Finance - January 25 & 26, 2001 in EB552     Cost:  $700.00

If a better understanding of Enron's transactions (a deal) that involves
Enron's financial as well as commercial participation with another business
entity would help you do your job better - this course was designed for you.

This course will give you a firm grasp of basic finance but in the context of
Enron's commercial and financial transactions.
The objective of this class is not to teach you how to do a deal, but rather,
to help you understand how basic financial principals contribute to the
structure of a deal and provide you with insight to Enron deals in order that
you can make a contribution to the work that goes into putting one together.

To register for any of these classes, click here (), or call 713 853-0357.


Dear Amazon Customer,

As someone who has purchased books about World War II and the men
and women who fought it, you might like to know about two recent
releases: "Our Finest Hour: The Triumphant Spirit of America's
World War II Generation" and Andy Rooney's "My War." These two
books, along with three related history titles, are now available
at 40% off. You can order your copies by following the links below:

"Our Finest Hour"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1883013984/
"Life" magazine boasted an uncommonly talented roster of writers
and photographers during World War II. "Our Finest Hour" features
the images and reports that brought home to American readers the
horrors of that distant war, and also documents the efforts on the
home front. This selection of photographs and extended captions
from the pages of "Life" and other contemporary publications
gathers images that have become part of American iconography.

Andy Rooney's "My War"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1586480103/
Andy Rooney's "My War," a fine and wholeheartedly irreverent memoir,
recounts his experiences as a correspondent for "Stars and Stripes,"
where he saw combat up-close while honing his craft alongside such
fellow chroniclers as Ernie Pyle and Bill Mauldin.

And, save 40% on these popular World War II-related titles:

"Flags of Our Fathers"
by James Bradley and Ron Powers
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0553111337/

"The Greatest Generation"
by Tom Brokaw
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375502025/

"The Greatest Generation Speaks: Letters and Reflections"
by Tom Brokaw
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375503943/

For more great gift ideas, visit our History section:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/9/

Happy reading,

Sunny Delaney
History Editor
Amazon.com

PS: We hope you enjoyed getting this message. However, if you'd
rather not receive e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com in the future,
please use the link below or click the Your Account button in the
top right corner of any page. Under the Your Account Settings
heading, click the "Update your communication preferences" link.

http://www.amazon.com/your-account/

Please note that this message was sent to the following e-mail
address:

kruscit@ect.enron.com


Your math looks good to me.  When can I expect my $140?
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:22 AM
To:	'hbucalo@houston.rr.com'; Ames, Chuck; Baumbach, David; Bucalo, Harry; Bucalo, Harry; Hull, Bryan; Jason Bass (E-mail); Lenhart, Matthew; Love, Phillip M.; Mathews, Reagan; Mills, Bruce; Rabon, Chance; Winfree, O'Neal D.
Subject:	FFL Update

Linked to this e-mail is a spreadsheet that breaks down weekly pool winnings and the playoffs.  Let me know if I have screwed something up.

-Eric

 << File: ffl book.xls >>


The appt. is setup for this Saturday(12/29) at 8:30 a.m.

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:44 AM
To:	Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	Please book medicals

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.

Sender:  tmalz18@bayland.net
Date:  Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:19:56 -0600
Subject:  You can even use Password.
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound BAT Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'password.bat'.

If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release.  If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.

North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)

Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.


I think partnering with a lawfirm would be a good idea re documentation.
However, I am not sure the ISDA board is likely to pick a proposal that
includes a competitor of the stature of Enron.  I will call ISDA and try to
get a read on what ISDA wants to do which is not clear at this point.

Regards,

Mark


Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing.  If there are any
personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please
insure that they receive a copy of this report.

To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, Brant Reves at x3-9897, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.


Please move forward on this as soon as possible
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Doukas, Tom
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6:17 PM
To: Nelson, Cheryl; Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Wall, David
Subject: RE: Prime Broker Accounts

Thanks Cheryl.

I need only ensure the funds we will need in order to meet the margin call at
Morgan is ready.

David,

I expect the needed margin at Morgan to be under $30mm once we move our longs
out.  Morgan has today agreed to 25% for shorts (from an average of 50%).  Of
the $30mm needed half is already at Goldman and Bear.

I anticipate therefore no more than $15mm in needed funds.  It may in fact be
less I will true up tomorrow

Can we get this by next week, and allow Cheryl to proceed full steam?

Thanks,

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nelson, Cheryl
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 5:30 PM
To: Doukas, Tom
Cc: Wall, David; Sage, Richard; Shackleton, Sara; Glover, Sheila
Subject: Re: Prime Broker Accounts

Hi Tom,  at your request the execution of these agreements have been on
hold.  Most of the leg work has been done.  I completed the negotiations on
the agreement so moving forward is a matter of getting a document ready for
signatures and getting it signed, having lawyers on both side proof read it
and getting the agreement and accompanying documents (which are complete)
executed.  This process, which is mainly administrative, could take two or
three days if I focused on as a priority to make sure it gets done.

Let me know how you want to proceed.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Tom Doukas/ENRON@enronXgate 04/26/2001 05:16 PM 	   To: Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron  cc: Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Sage/LON/ECT@ECT  Subject: Prime Broker Accounts

Sara & Cheryl,

Could you please provide a status on where we stand on the transfer of the
Credit book from ENA/ECT to ECI at Goldman and Morgan.

I had previously asked you to hold up on Morgan until the Bear issue was
resolved.  I am hoping we do not have to much effort ahead of us to move
these two accounts over.

Thanks,

Tom


Now wait one darn minute, lil' lady (do you hear John Wayne's voice?).  The
price cap in California remains--that's right, remains--at a lofty $250/Mwh.
Thank you, Government Affairs.

Seriously, seems reportable, given that at one point it had moved to a
time-differentiated cap.

	Susan J Mara
	11/21/2000 05:47 PM

		 To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Nov. 22 Significant Events report

No.  Everything is a continuous blur to me now,

	Paul Kaufman@ECT
	11/21/2000 03:28 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich
		 cc:
		 Subject: Nov. 22 Significant Events report

Any significant events???

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 11/21/2000 03:35
PM ---------------------------

Rubena Buerger@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/21/2000 01:44 PM
To: Janine Migden@EES, Paul Kaufman@ECT, Steve Montovano@EES
cc:
Subject: Nov. 22 Significant Events report

Items for Harry's weekly Significant Events report are due tomorrow
afternoon, Nov. 22.  If you would like to submit any items, you may call me
or send an e-mail message to me.  You may also contact Harry directly.

Thank you,
Rubena "the pest"
713-853-1516


---------------------- Forwarded by Leann Walton/NA/Enron on 10/26/2000 10:52
AM ---------------------------

Alison Sealy on 10/09/2000 10:37:40 AM
To: mraymon@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Presentation on metals

Hi Maureen,

It was good to meet you last week and hear your presentation on the metals -
full of advice on what to think about and all the various things that affect
the market place.  I am only sorry I had to dash off to the airport - good
job I left when I did though as check-in took ages!

Anyway, please could you send me through a copy of that presentation either
on email or if it is located on the network somewhere then I could access it
over the intranet?  I will be joining the LME conference tomorrow so am
currently trying to do a bit of reading in preparation.

Thanks very much in advance & look forward to seeing the presentation over
here in London.

Kind Regards
Alison


Soaring Electric Use More Fiction Than Fact
Chronicle investigation finds power companies manipulate data to excuse their
towering rates Christian Berthelsen, Scott Winokur, Chronicle Staff Writers
Sunday, March 11, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/11/M
N213155.DTL

Power companies say it so often, and with such certainty, that it has become
a virtual mantra: "Skyrocketing" energy use by Californians is a root cause
of the state's power crisis, and justification for surging electricity
prices.
But a computer analysis of electricity usage data by The Chronicle reveals
that the mantra is a myth -- that overall growth in electricity demand hasn't
been nearly as great as the industry portrays it.
The industry has painted the summer of 2000 as the equivalent of a 100-year
storm in meteorology -- an event so powerful and unexpected that the existing
infrastructure was devastated by its force.
The statistics show that 2000, taken in total, was nothing of the sort.
Moreover, two independent state agencies' assessments of California's power
plant capacity appear to show that the growth should have been easily
accommodated.
The companies have defended their practice of increasingly taking power-
generation plants out of service by arguing that heavy demand and consequent
plant usage necessitated major, time-consuming repairs.
"The claims that demand growth is rampant and that it was totally unexpected
and due to the Internet economy, to Silicon Valley, or server farms,
or people recharging cell phones -- that's bogus," said Tom Kelly, assistant
executive director of the California Energy Commission. "About as bogus as
you can get."
The Chronicle's findings are based on data collected by the California
Independent System Operator, a manager of the state's electricity grid. They
show:
-- Total electricity consumption in California increased only 4.75 percent in
2000 from 1999, a sharp contrast to claims of industry representatives, who
have repeatedly relied on isolated, loose or selective comparisons that make
growth appear as high as 20 percent. In fact, the single greatest hour of
electricity usage in 2000 was actually lower than any peak demand period in
1999 or 1998.
-- Average peak demand -- the average of the highest hour of electricity
usage for each day -- increased only 4.79 percent from 1999 to 2000. Even
during the months of May to September in 2000, when the greatest spikes in
electricity usage occur, demand growth was only 8.31 percent higher than the
same period the year before.
-- More than 30 days of critical power shortage warnings, so-called Stage 3
emergencies, and two days of blackouts this year occurred at times of
moderate energy use -- levels often below those at which neither warnings nor
blackouts have occurred in the past.
The findings appear to buttress suspicions that the "skyrocketing demand"
explanation for rising energy prices is a cover for what is really happening
--
that power companies have simply started charging more for an essential
commodity, regardless of whether it is in short supply.
Presented with The Chronicle's findings, Gary Ackerman, a representative for
the Western Power Trading Forum, a trade group representing power companies,
said the calculations support the industry position that electricity demand
is growing strong.
"That's pretty healthy growth for California as opposed to the long-term
historical average, which is close to 2 percent," he said. "To me, that's
really strong growth."
Energy demand is certainly on the rise in California -- growth of more than 4
percent is still double what was projected -- and the state has obviously
fallen behind in building power plants.
Even though a recent study found California ranked 47th out of the 50 states
in per-capita energy consumption, the surging demand explanation has become
so accepted that leading officials accept it as gospel. Gov. Gray Davis has
made energy conservation -- 10 percent, at that -- a centerpiece of his
efforts to solve the crisis.
"Energy use is growing," said state Sen. John Burton, D-San Francisco, citing
the growth of Silicon Valley and high-tech operations statewide. "There's
been tremendous growth, whether manufacturing or high tech -- cell phones,
faxes, whatever. The stuff is growing."
Yet the energy industry has been steadfast in its insistence that the
consumer is largely to blame. In testimony and submissions to government
bodies considering prescriptions for the crisis, energy demand growth has
consistently been overstated.
Joe Bob Perkins, the chief operating officer of Houston-based Reliant Energy
Inc., told the U.S. Senate in January that California's growing economy and
high summer temperatures caused electricity use to "surge dramatically" -- a
demand growth of 13 percent.
Richard Wheatley, a spokesman for Reliant, said Perkins' testimony was based
on estimates by the federal Energy Information Administration of monthly
retail electricity sales.
"We do stand by that," Wheatley said. "Unfortunately, it does not track with
ISO data."
The industry-backed Edison Electric Institute said in a report that
electricity demand grew by anywhere from 5 percent to 21 percent during the
spring of 2000, compared with the same period a year earlier.
Russell Tucker, an economist for the institute, said the group's figures were
derived by identifying the single highest hour of electricity demand for each
spring month of 1999 and 2000 and comparing them, finding the May peak rose
21 percent.
Granted, the state Energy Commission uses the same model to determine whether
California has enough plant capacity to meet demand. But the presentation
makes it appear that overall demand, not just the absolute peak, is growing
by 21 percent. When the peak of each day is averaged and compared from year
to year, May's figure was much lower: 12.79 percent.
Also, nowhere did Edison's report note that the peak hour of 2000, a load of
43,784 megawatts on Aug. 16, was actually lower than the peak hours of either
of the previous two years -- 45,884 on July 12, 1999, or 44,406 on Sept.
1, 1998.
The Chronicle analysis of average peak demand showed that no month last year
grew more than June's 15.34 percent, though no blackouts occurred in that
month. May and June were the only months when demand growth exceeded 10
percent, the analysis showed. Most months recorded 4 percent or 5 percent,
and some -- such as September -- were less than 3 percent.
Two months, October and December, had demand levels lower than the year
before -- 4.22 percent less for October, 1.46 percent lower for December.
Mike Florio, a consumer lawyer and board member of the ISO, said that even
growth of less than 5 percent from 1999 to 2000 would seem overstated, since
1999 was a relatively mild weather year and 2000 was a much hotter one. "You
are quite right," Florio said. " 'Skyrocketing' demand is a myth."
MARKET MANIPULATION?
Consumer representatives and some politicians have long suspected that,
rather than dire imbalances between supply and demand, market manipulation is
behind the crisis.
Generators and power marketers adamantly deny this, saying they have done
everything they could to keep the lights on. They say they ran aging,
decrepit plants at higher-than-normal levels last summer to accommodate what
they described as unprecedented demand. They also say that, at great expense,
they delayed much-needed maintenance in order to keep the power flowing.
Their claims have received some support from the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, which said in a report last month that it found no evidence power
companies were using maintenance schedules to manipulate supply. The report,
however, was heavily qualified by the FERC, which said it did not investigate
other forms of manipulation. Moreover, the agency acknowledged that the bulk
of its investigation was conducted by simply calling power plants and
questioning them over the telephone.
The supply side of the energy equation is harder to penetrate, in part
because supply data are confidential. Thus, the question of how blackouts
could have occurred at such low levels of demand in January is hard to
answer. What is clear is that, at times, during the crisis this year, as much
as 12, 000 megawatts of electricity supply have been unavailable for use,
mostly because of unplanned plant outages -- about four times the level
anticipated by the ISO.
Power companies say the old plants they bought were not capable of producing
to the levels sketched out by the ISO and the Energy Commission, and that
everything from low water conditions, emissions limitations and high
temperatures last year caused less energy to be available than was
anticipated.
But others suggest that what began as a shortage caused by a withholding of
supply to drive up price has turned into one caused by withholdings out of
fear of not being paid.
What did go up, unquestionably, were wholesale electricity prices.
While average electricity usage during the heaviest hours last year increased
by less than 5 percent, prices charged by power companies to the utilities
that deliver juice to consumers increased more than 289 percent.
In June, the cost of a megawatt hour increased more than fivefold, going from
the 1999 level of $30.53 to $170.60. In October, prices doubled over the same
period a year earlier, going from $53.47 to $111.04. And in December --
despite a 1.46 percent decline in electricity usage from the previous
December -- peak wholesale electricity prices hit $425.59. They'd been $31.88
one year before.
Then the pace of price increases began to accelerate within the last six
months of 2000. Overall, average peak usage during December was about 31,200
megawatts, about a fifth lower than it was in August. Average prices in
December? They just about doubled, to $425 a megawatt hour.
The companies' explanation for rising prices despite falling demand was that
more and more plants had to be taken offline for repairs, decreasing supply.
Even given the high number of inoperable plants, questions remain about why
the existing supply could not cover demand.
On the blackout days of Jan. 17 and 18 fewer plants were offline -- and more
electricity was available -- than on days when the state managed to squeeze
by without turning out the lights.
Even today, with Stage 3 alerts having faded away, at least temporarily,
demand levels remain more or less the same as when California was in a
constant state of emergency. Moreover, the lists of offline plants are as
long as ever.
AMPLE POWER SHOULD EXIST
The Energy Commission and the ISO have concluded that California's power
plants are capable of generating more than 45,000 megawatts of electricity.
That means that even with plant repair outages, low water levels decreasing
hydraulic generation, air-pollution rules and other environmental
constraints, the power companies should be able to accommodate all but the
most extreme spikes in demand.
According to industry data obtained by The Chronicle, the Western Systems
Coordinating Council, a government-backed trade group in Salt Lake City,
concluded California would have considerable surpluses throughout 2000,
including margins as high as 39 percent in December, based on data provided
to it by the ISO. Even under low water conditions, the ISO reported, the
state would have total power resources of 47,532 megawatts in that month. Yet
unplanned outages were far higher, and the system began to crash that month
and into this year, at far lower levels of demand.
"Clearly," Florio said, "we should not be having a shortage at 2 a.m. on
Christmas Eve, when the only person awake is Santa Claus."
Chronicle Database Editor Erin McCormick assisted in data analysis for this
report. Chronicle editorial assistant Claire Smith assisted in data
collection for this report. / E-mail Christian Berthelsen at
cberthelsen@sfchronicle.com and Scott Winokur at s
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


Check out this site. Rick   http://www.laconiamcweek.com/


Larry,

The approach speed indicator you refer to that is currently used is not
intrinsically safe and should not be approved for use by the FERC or USCG.
The system we are recommending is similar to the one being used in India and
other ports and is an integrated system. The additional cost of including the
approach speed indicator with the tension monitoring and quick release is
minimal compared to an incident. Larry Snyder and Tony Galt can give you more
information on the need for this and the cost effectiveness.

Rgds/TP

ShepherdEco@aol.com on 03/06/2001 06:18:43 PM
To: Larry.Snyder@enron.com
cc: Victor.Vega@enron.com, Todd.Peterson@enron.com, Greg.Curran@enron.com

Subject: Re: Last report

Larry - Please add your comments/corrections and forward on to Victor.

Approach velocity metering is currently hand held and portable and will
remain so. ?No permanent equipment is planned for installation. ?The purpose
of the equipment is to measure the ship's approach velocity as it is nearing
the mooring position. ?The velocity should not exceed 6 inches per second as
it contacts the breasting dolphins. ?If the ship were to impact the dock at
a
greater velocity, then a subsequent inspection should be performed to
ascertain whether or not damage to pier pilings had occurred.

The metered mooring hooks have been recommended but not specified nor
procured. ?The metered hooks would allow close monitoring of ship's forces
on
the dock during unloading and the data would allow for the ship to adjust
forces on the dock, and this controlling the ship's position, by precise
application/use of ballast and intermediate adjustment of mooring lines.
This
feature, by providing precise information on the forces (and motion) of the
ship relative to the dock would allow for greater precision in positioning
of
the ship at the optimum vertical and horizontal position relative to the
unloading arms and avoidance of undue forces on the unloading arms.
This feature would reduce likelyhood of perc valves discharging and
disconnecting of the ship during unloading. ?In summary, it's an information
system that provides for a higher level of control of the unloading process.

Regards,


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 09:12 AM
---------------------------

BRIAN HOSKINS@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
02/22/2001 04:36 PM
To: Alicia Perkins/HOU/EES@EES, Denise
Naiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine
Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT, roberto.martinez@enron.com, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: cat attack

 http://www.adcritic.com/content/peta-bad-cats.html


Gentlemen,

Here is a guy who is looking for a summer associate position. I looked at his
resume and think that he may be worth talking to.

Pavel
---------------------- Forwarded by Pavel Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
01:37 PM ---------------------------

Dmitri Villevald <Dmitri.Villevald@owen2002.vanderbilt.edu> on 01/03/2001
06:56:54 PM
To: "Pavel Zadorozhny (E-mail)" <pavel.zadorozhny@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: asking for advice regarding Summer Associate position at Enron

Dear Mr. Zadorozhny:

Maxim Philippov suggested that I write you. Being a first-year MBA student
at Owen Graduate School of Management (Vanderbilt University) with a Finance
concentration, I am looking for a Summer Associate position at Enron.

The area of my particular interest is Enron's risk management products
(commodity derivatives research and trading). Graduating from Novosibirsk
State University with major in physics, I am eager to apply my experience
with the use of theoretical and statistical physics techniques to the
managing of modeling processes and creating complex financial and trading
models. I strongly believe that my graduate education coupled with
undergraduate background in physics, solid work experience in finance and
proven entrepreneurial spirit will allow me to contribute to Enron as a
Summer Associate.

I would really appreciate your advice regarding employment opportunities at
Enron and would like to find out more about Enron Capital & Trade Resources
Corp. I will call you within this week to follow up on my request.

Thank you very much for your time.

Sincerely,

Dmitri Villevald

Enclosure: resume

 <<Resume.doc>>
P.S. Looking through an example of margin risk hedging at Enron's Web site,
I think I found a small mistake there. URL of this page is

<http://www.ect.enron.com/products/risk/margin_intro.fset.html> (producer
application)

The second sentence of the paragraph beginning with "Paradigm and Enron
exchange..."
states the following.

For example, if the actual margin is $1.25/MMBtu for a given month, then
Paradigm will pay Enron $0.13/MMBtu. Alternatively, if the actual margin is
$2.00/MMBtu, then Enron will pay Paradigm $0.62/MMBtu.

I believe, if I am reading it correctly, the money should flow in the
opposite direction, namely:

For example, if the actual margin is $1.25/MMBtu for a given month, then
Enron will pay Paradigm $0.13/MMBtu. Alternatively, if the actual margin is
$2.00/MMBtu, then Paradigm will pay Enron $0.62/MMBtu.

Am I right?

Again, thank you very much for your time.

 - Resume.doc


This request has been pending your approval for  11 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000061279&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000061279
Request Create Date : 9/20/01 11:47:26 AM
Requested For       : elizabeth.sager@enron.com
Resource Name       : Live Link ENA
Resource Type       : Applications


Shouldn't we get some of these for the dome to plant flowers in???

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers
To: Cameron; Jeff Dasovich; Prentice @ Berkeley; Prentice Sellers; Scott
Laughlin
Sent: 11/1/01 11:37 AM
Subject: FW: Planter Barrels

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Bill Cook
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:12 PM
> To:	# All Napa Valley
> Subject:	Planter Barrels
>
>  --------------------------------------------------PLEASE POST FOR
THOSE
> WITHOUT E-MAIL--------------------------------------------------
>
> 				   PLANTER BARREL SALE
>
> We have a surplus of older wine barrels, and will be making them
available
> for purchase by RMW employees.
>
>  These are seven year-old white barrels suitable for use as planters
or as
> neutral containers for winemaking.
>
>   The total price (including tax) will be $16.13 per barrel, and are
> available at the Bedford barrel warehouse,
> 					     901 Kaiser Rd. in Napa.
>
> 				Buyers are responsible for
transportation.
>
>
>                                         If interested, contact Bill
Cook
> via e-mail or at extension 4954.


Here is my edit of your points.  I went for simpler language and beating up
on the CPUC.  Use as much or as little as you want. Thanks, Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: athomas@newenergy.com [mailto:athomas@newenergy.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:56 PM
To: mday@gmssr.com
Subject: talking points

Appreciate any edits or thoughts you may have on the talking points before
I send them out.  Thanks.

Aaron

 - X23180.DOC


Attn: Mr. Dan J. Hvyl

We are wondering if you received our fax of January 30, 2001 and if so
whether you have had an opportunity to consider it.

Gulf Canada Resources Limited

Per: Michael Kleiner,  Law Department
(403) 233-3330


Sorry you can't make it.  We'll miss ya!

What have you been up to lately?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ruscitti, Kevin [mailto:Kevin.Ruscitti@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:02 AM
To: smitter@smitter.com
Subject: RE: Anderson '96 Reunion - 4 weeks away!

Steve,

Hope everything is going well.  Unfortunately I won't be able to attend
the reunion.  Hope you have a great time.  Talk to you soon.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Smith [mailto:smitter@smitter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Steve Smith (E-mail); Pete Rose (E-mail); Lynne Bartron (E-mail);
'Melissa Salazar (E-mail)'
Subject: Anderson '96 Reunion - 4 weeks away!

Dear Class of 1996,

**Note:  Response to this email requested, thanks!

Well, our much anticipated 5-year Reunion is less than a month away!
The
planning committe is working hard on the events, and we are trying to
firm
up the list of attendees.  We got a GREAT response to the last email,
thanks
for taking the time to let us know your status.  If you haven't
responded
yet, please do so just so we can adequately reserve space.

Just to remind some of you, the event will take place on: *** November
2-4th
*** in Los Angeles, CA!   The rough schedule of events is shown below.
In a
subsequent email today or tomorrow we will provide some details about
hotel
accommodations.  You will also be receiving an information packet from
the
Alumni Office in a mailing that should be out next week.

If you are planning to fly I've heard there are some great deals on
Southwest and United among others (<$100 from SF).  Anderson Alums also
get
a 10% on Southwest (see below)

If you would like to respond to this email regarding your status, please
use
this form:

1) Status of your email account
	A)  Got this info - email address is correct
	B)  Got this info - but would prefer to use another address next
time
	C)  I did not get this info (not sure how you would answer this,
but...)

Note:  You may have received this note twice - it was sent to all
members of
the Class of 1996 currently registered in the Alumni Database, as well
as to
the Class of 1996 Email List (which is opt-in).

2) Plans for attending the Reunion Weekend
	A)  Will definitely be Attending
	B)  Will make a brief appearance (1 or 2 events)
	C)  Still Deciding
	D)  Will not be Attending (but wish I could)

3) Comments/Suggestions - Any thoughts on how to make this a GREAT
reunion?

As mentioned previously, its been a rough year for many of us and it
would
be great to end the year with some fun and good times!  I can tell you
from
what we've been hearing, and from the number of responses received, that
we
are going to have an awesome turnout for the events, so you don't want
to
miss out!!!   So get your tickets, review your facebook (so who was that
Doug Dahl character anyways), dust off the old Anderson attire and let's
party!!

Sincerely,
Steve Smith
On behalf of Pete, Lynne, Melissa and many, many Reunion Organizers

Southwest Airlines Partners with Anderson Alums!
-------------------------------------------------

- Save 10% off lowest priced fares all Anderson Alumni returning to
campus
for Alumni Weekend.
- Flights must be booked into LAX, Burbank, Ontario or John Wayne
airports.
- Call 800/433-5368 and reference Anderson's Group ID #R9216
- For flight schedules, visit http://www.southwest.com

OVERVIEW of CLASS OF 1996 EVENTS
--------------------------------------

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 2

 **	5:30 p.m.	Reunion Beer Bust: Wine and Beer Tasting
			- Location: Anderson Courtyard
	   		- All reunion classes will be there
			- A fun first chance to catch up!  Just like old
times!
			- Contact: Pete Rose; rosep@towers.com
				or Steve Smith; smitter@smitter.com for
details

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 3

	AFTERNOON
 **	12:30 p.m.	Class of 1996 Barbecue / Picnic
			- Location: Will Rogers State Park
			- BBQ / Party / Volleyball
			- The Grass, the Food/Drinks, the Sun & Fun
			- Contact: Danielle (Romano) Schreiber;
schreiberd@earthlink.net

	Note:  This event was moved from the Beach to reduce the driving
distances,
and provide 	better logistics, as well as tables, BBQ pits, even
playgrounds
for some of you w/ kids

	EVENING
 **	7:00 p.m.	Class of 1996 Reunion Dinner
			- Location:  The Gate (tentative)
			- Dinner and Dancing in Hollywood (remember
O-Week?)!
			- This events is Adults only (sorry, no kids)
			- Contact:  Gina (Wilson) Calderon;
Gina_Calderon@citysearch.com
				or Kim Moore; kmoore@k-swiss.com for
details

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 4

	MORNING
 **	10:00 a.m.	Class of 1996 Golf Tourney
			- Location:  Camarillo Springs Golf Course
			- Currently 20 "big hitters" signed up, room for
a few more
			- Event with competition and prizes
			- Contact:  Mike Solomon; mcsolomon@hotmail.com
for details

	AFTERNOON
 **	12:00 p.m.	Class of 1996 Getty Museum Tour
			- Location:  The Getty Museum
			- If you haven't marveled at the wonder, its
time
			- Contact:  Rumor has it Jean Miao will give us
a tour!!

FULL REUNION WEEKEND SCHEDULE
-----------------------------

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 2

	MORNING
	7:30 a.m.	Continental Breakfast
	8:15 a.m.	Plenary Session: "Leadership"
	10:00 a.m.	Break
	10:30 a.m.	Session I
	12:00 noon	Luncheon and Keynote Address:
				"Leadership in Action: Charting a new
Course"

	AFTERNOON
	1:30 p.m.	Session II
	3:00 p.m.	Break
	3:30 p.m.	The Exchange
	4:30 p.m.	Guided Tours of The Anderson School

	EVENING
 **	5:30 p.m.	Reunion Beer Bust: Wine and Beer Tasting
			- Location: Anderson Courtyard
	   		- All reunion classes will be there
			- A fun first chance to catch up!  Just like old
times!
			- Contact: Pete Rose; rosep@towers.com
				or Steve Smith; smitter@smitter.com for
details

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 3

	MORNING
	8:30 a.m.	Networking Breakfast
	9:15 a.m.	Welcoming Remarks
	9:30 a.m.	Plenary Session I - "Best Practices and Board
Governance"
	11:00 a.m.	Plenary Session II - "The National Business
Forecast"

	AFTERNOON
 **	12:30 p.m.	Class of 1996 Barbecue / Picnic
			- Location: Will Rogers State Park
			- BBQ / Party / Volleyball
			- The Grass, the Food/Drinks, the Sun & Fun
			- Contact: Danielle (Romano) Schreiber;
schreiberd@earthlink.net
	2:30 p.m.	Program concludes
	5:00 p.m.	Dean's Thank You Reception to Reunion Committee
Leaders

	EVENING
 **	7:00 p.m.	Class of 1996 Reunion Dinner
			- Location:  The Gate (tentative)
			- Dinner and Dancing in Hollywood (remember
O-Week?)!
			- This events is Adults only (sorry, no kids)
			- Contact:  Gina (Wilson) Calderon;
Gina_Calderon@citysearch.com
				or Kim Moore; kmoore@k-swiss.com for
details

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 4

	MORNING
 **	10:00 a.m.	Class of 1996 Golf Tourney
			- Location:  Camarillo Springs Golf Course
			- Currently 20 "big hitters" signed up, room for
a few more
			- Event with competition and prizes
			- Contact:  Mike Solomon; mcsolomon@hotmail.com
for details

	AFTERNOON
 **	12:00 p.m.	Class of 1996 Getty Museum Tour
			- Location:  The Getty Museum
			- If you haven't marveled at the wonder, its
time
			- Contact:  Rumor has it Jean Miao will give us
a tour!!
	Various 	Reunion Activities / Free Time !!

------------------>
Steve Smith
mailto:smitter@smitter.com

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


JAN. 19,2001 CUT, HOURS 6, 23,&24 REDUCED FROM 25 TO 0 AND WILL BE SCHEDULED
REAL TIME.

SHEDULE CUT AT COB FOR HOURS 6,23,& 24 FROM 25 MW'S TO 0

SCHEDULE CUT AT MID C FOR HOURS 6,23,24 FROM 25 MW'S TO 0

ALSO, SEE NOTES FOR DETAILS ON EACH DEAL.
THANKS
MIKE


Looks good to me.

Susan Flynn
07/01/99 03:21 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vacation

  Mark - I would like to take Monday, August 30, 1999 through Friday,
September 3, 1999 as vacation.  Please let me know if this meets with your
approval.   Thank you.


Steve,

After the Napa meeting last December, I headed up a  working group to look at
coordinating EBS issues Internationally.  Initially I spoke with most of the
people who signed up for the group, and began gathering comments and
suggestions for improved coordination.   However, much of the need for a
working group was reduced for two reasons; first, the addition of Donald
Lassere provided a person within our group to focus exclusively on
international coordination, and secondly, the Global Public Affairs
reorganizations this year solved many of the jurisdictional questions that
were highlighted by many in my working group.  After the re-org, we saw
little reason to continue the working group.

The group did serve as a good sounding board for people to comment on
communications strategies and  better coordination within Government/Public
Affairs.  Many of these strategies (particularly more relationship building
internally) were implemented.  Additionally, the experience was a good one
simply because it offered an opportunity to better educate other group
members on EBS and telecommunications in general.

I would not recommend re-forming the group at this time.  I think many of the
goals the group was initially formed for are actually being achieved now
through better organizational structures and closer collaboration between EBS
support personnel and International group members.

Many of the EBS related topics that deserve a collaborative, cross-functional
process are being examined through informal, ad-hoc working groups now.  For
instance, based on concerns raised at a recent EBS/Government Affairs
off-site, we now have an international regulatory/tax/legal working group.
This group is comprised of participants from Rick Shapiro's group, Mark
Schroeder's group and EBS commercial support organizations.

I am a little unclear on what personal feedback you want on group members.
Please advise what format I should address this in, since I am not a reviewer
for almost anyone who was in my group.  Suffice to say, everyone was helpful
during the brief time the working group was in effect.   But I can give more
detail on individuals if you would like.

Thanks for the opportunity to lead a working group (even for such a short
time!) and please let me know if I can provide any additional information.

Best, Scott

	Steven J Kean@ENRON
	Sent by: Maureen McVicker@ENRON
	11/20/00 08:12 AM

		 To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott Bolton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Dawson/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rubena
Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tracy Cooper/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: WORKING GROUP PROGRESS

Please provide me an update on the progress of the working group you have led
this year.  There are several things I would like you to cover in this regard.

Did the working group function through the year or was it terminated (I
recognize there may be good reasons for the latter, but would like to
understand those reasons).

What did the group accomplish?

Would you recommend continuing it?   Any changes?

Are there other topics we should consider for working groups in the future?
Any changes to the working group process itself?

Please provide input on the individuals you worked with.  You should be able
to do this through the PEP system.  If you cannot, please provide the
feedback by confidential e-mail to me.  Because the PRC is coming up soon,
please provide the feedback by December 1.


Please join me and the Global Accounting leadership team in congratulating
the following individuals on their promotions to:

To Managing Director
 Sally Beck (EWN)
 Fernley Dyson (EEL)

To Vice President
 Beth Apollo (ENW)
 Janine Juggins (EEL Tax)
 Phillip Lord (EBS)
 Laura Scott (ENA)
 Chris Sherman (ENA)
 Wade Stubblefield (EES)

To Senior Director
 Buddy Aiken (EEL)
 Jim Coffey (ENA)
 Donette Dewar (Intl. Tax)
 Patricia Dunn (NEPCO)
 Mark Frank (ENA)
 William Gehle (EECC)
 Joseph Grajewski (EECC)
 Jan Johnson (Corp)
 Scott Mills (ENW)
 James New (EEL)
 Mary L. Ruffer (ENA)
 Richard Sage (EEL)
 Elaine Schield (Corp)
 Kevin Sweeney (ENW)
 Beth Wapner (EBS Tax)

Director
 Thresa Allen (ENW)
 Ron Baker (Corp)
 Misty Barrett (EES)
 Jeff Blumenthal (EWS)
 Trey Cash (Corp Tax)
 Karen Choyce (Corp)
 Cheryl Dawes (ENA)
 Lanette Earnest (EWS Tax)
 Jeffrey Gossett (ENW)
 Robert Guthrie (ETS Tax)
 Susan Helton (ENA)
 Ralph Jaeger (EEL)
 Andrea Kerch (EEL)
 Faith Killen (ENA)
 Johnna Kokenge (Corp)
 Matt Landy (EEL)
 Andy Lawrence (ISC)
 Connie Lee (EBS)
 Caroline Lothian (EEL)
 Meg Malone (Corp Tax)
 Gary Peng (Corp)
 Stephen Schwarzbach (Corp)
 Sally Seelig (EES Tax)
 Don Shackley (EES/London Tax)
 Patricia Shannon (Corp)
 Eddie Sikes (Intl. Tax)
 Jeffrey Smith ( EGM)
 Ron Smith (GSS)
 Kim Theriot (ENW)
 Hope Vargas (ENA)
 Tina Ward (EEL)
 Stephen Whitaker (EEL)
 Stacey White (ENW)
 Rob Wilcott (Corp)

To Manager
 Christopher Abel (ENW)
 Stacey Aune (ENA)
 David Baumbach (ENW)
 Maya Beyhum (ENW London)
 Patricia Bloom (ENA)
 Matthew Brown (ENW)
 Vince Cacaro (ISC)
 Clara Carrington (ENW)
 Carol Carter (ENA)
 Carolyn Centilli (ISC)
 Erin Copeland (EECC)
 Richard Cross (ENW)
 Rachel Davis (Corp)
 Michael Desbiens (ISC)
 David Dupre (ISC)
 Eileen Flanagan (EEL)
 Regina Figueroa (ISC)
 Rebecca Ford (ENW)
 Darron Giron (ENW)
 Julie Goodfriend (International Tax)
 Karen Gruesen (ENA)
 Kevin Hall (EEL)
 Kristen Hanson (ENW)
 David Horne (ISC)
 Larry Hunter (ENW)
 Todd Hunter (EES)
 Jim Ischy (GSS)
 Chris Jones (ISC)
 William Kasmervisz (ENW)
 Kam Kaiser (ENW)
 Kedar Kulkarni (ISC)
 Monica Lande (ENW Portland)
 Suzanne Lane (EEL)
 Vince Mack (ISC)
 David Maxwell (ENW)
 Emitra Nelson (ISC
 Caroline Nugent (EWS Tax)
 Mark Pope (ISC)
 Yiannis Poulopoulos (London Tax)
 Melissa Ratnala (ENW)
 Jason Sharp (Corp Tax)
 Stephanie Smith (Corp)
 Patricia Spence (ENW)
 Amy Spode (ENW)
 Patricia Sullivan (ENW)
 Lisa Sutton (ETS)
 John Swinney (ENW)
 Deana Taylor (Corp)
 Dimitri Taylor (ENW)
 Wayne Tencer (EES)
 Bernella Tholen (ENA)
 Theresa Vos (ENA)
 Blake Walker (EECC)
 Bob Ward (International Tax)
 David Williams (EEL)

To Senior Specialist
 Amelia Alland (ENW)
 James Armstrong (ENA)
 Carmen Ayala (GSS
 Cynthia Balfour-Flanagan (ENW)
 Gilda Bartz (Corp)
 Stacey Brewer (ENW)
 Marian Briscoe (Corp Tax)
 Aneela Charania (ENW)
 Patricia Clark (Corp)
 Chris Crixell (EES Tax)
 Diane Ellstrom (ENW)
 Heidi Griffith (EES)
 Marla Hernandez (ISC)
 Marlene Hilliard (ENW)
 Dave Hollick (London Tax)
 Rachel Jones (EEL)
 Dawn Kenne (ENW)
 Harry Kent (EWS Tax)
 Blanca Lopez (ENA)
 Brian Hunter Lindsay (EEL)
 Rachel Lyon (EEL)
 Stacy Hardy (ENA)
 Sally McAdams (ISC)
 Kelly McCain (Corp Tax)
 Errol McLaughlin, Jr. (ENW)
 Sylvia Martinez (ISC)
 Kevin Meredith (ENW)
 Meredith Mitchell (ENW)
 Winnie Ngai (Corp Tax)
 Thien-Huong Ngo (ENW)
 Brian Palmer (ENW)
 Bich Ann T Pham (ENA)
 Shelly Pierson (Corp)
 Lillie Pittman (ISC)
 David Rae (ENW)
 Dixie Riddle (ETS Tax)
 Salvador Dominguez (Corp)
 Mark Schrab (ENW)
 Stephanie Sever (ENW)
 Danielle Shafer (ISC)
 Shifali Sharma (ENW)
 Keith Simper (ENA)
 Christopher Spears (ENW)
 Caron Stark (ISC)
 Tara Sweitzer (ENW)
 David Vandor (ENA)
 Mary Womack (ISC)
 David Yang (International Tax)
 Sabrae Zajac (ENW)

To Specialist
 Kim Chick (EES Tax)
 Justin East (EEL)
 Joey Esperance (International Tax)
 Randi Howard (ISC)
 Melanie Hutchinson (EWS Tax)
 Mary Joseph (Corp Tax)
 Sherri Kathol (International Tax)
 Lex Lacaze (International Tax)
 Michelle LeBlanc (Corp Tax)
 Ling Li (EWS Tax)
 Kori Loibl (ENW)
 Alan Marsh (Corp Tax)
 Bruce Mills (ENW)
 Erika Moore (EEL)
 Matthew Motsinger (ENW)
 Sherry Meyers (ISC)
 Andrea Price (Corp Tax)
 Bernice Rodriguez (ENW)
 Tina Salinas (EES Tax)
 Brent Vasconcellos (Corp Tax)
 Brandi Wachtendorf (ENW)
 Patryk Wlodarski      (ENW London)

To Entry Specialist
 Stuart Sheldrick (EEL)

To Accountant I
 Becky Klussman (Corp)

To Accountant II
 Silvia Shelby (Accounts Payable)

To Staff
 Mary Behn (EES)
 Guy Freshwater (ENW London)
 Geralynn Gosnell (ENW)
 Richard Miley (ENW)
 Brent Storey (ENW London)
 Stuart Thom (ENW London)
 Judith Walters (ENW)
 Jonathan White (ENW London)
 Joan Winfrey (ENW)

To Senior Tax Analyst
 Emily Allwardt (International Tax)
 Leon Branom (EBS Tax)
 Shanna Husser (EES Tax)
 Shilpa Mane (Corporate/London Tax)
 Todd Richards (Corp Tax)
 Michelle Thompson (Corp Tax)

To Sr. Administrative Assistant
 Norma Chavez (International Tax)
 Sarah Knott (ENW London)

To Sr. Travel Administrator
 Cheryl Slone (GSS )

To Administrative Coordinator
 Heather Choate (ENW)
 Kayla Heitmeyer (GSS)

To Senior Clerk
 Angela Barnett (ENW)
 Matthew Davies (ENW London)
 Daniela De Lisi (ENW London)
 Rufino Dorteo (ENA)
 Mark Pilkington (ENW London)
 Narjinder Sandhu (EEL)
 Howard Sweasey (EEL)
 Laura Vargas (ENW)
 Jo Ann Woods (Corp Tax)

To Intermediate Clerk
 Maria Maldonado (Accounts Payable)
 Araceli Mondragon (Accounts Payable)
 Irma Rodriguez (Accounts Payable)
 Bernita Sowell (Accounts Payable)


Notice No:  01-71
February 27, 2001

COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.
CANDIDATES, FORUM

Please be advised that a Commodity Exchange, Inc. candidates, member forum is
scheduled to be held on MONDAY, MARCH 5, 2001 at 2:45 p.m. in the Seminar
Room of the Exchange, One North End Avenue, New York City.

At that time, each candidate will be given the opportunity to address the
membership regarding the 2001 Annual Elections scheduled to be held on
Tuesday, March 13, 2001.

Inquiries regarding the aforementioned may be directed to Donna Talamo at
(212) 299-2372.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-71)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


I have asked and will let you know the answer later today.    The bigger question is that they can not loan money to Enron and can only dividend, so if they can do something to raise the cash, they still can't get it out any more out than they can by dividending.    The other problem is that they are running into cash problems themselves since they were in the process of going to the bond markets when all of this occurred, and were advised to wait.   Their receivables from California are part of the problem.   More update later.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Colwell, Wes
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 7:09 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Inventory

Hey! Just a reminder to check on the Portland General inventory.

Wes


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Oquinn, Kari
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 3:49 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richter, Brad
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 11:51 AM
To:	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Cc:	Oquinn, Kari
Subject:	FW:

Amy--

Attached is an EOL bonus matrix per Louise's request.  I haven't changed any of the numbers from the basic calculation done by Kari.  For clarification, Kara Lauer is a Sr. Specialist.  Call me if you have questions.

Brad Richter

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oquinn, Kari
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 10:52 AM
To:	Richter, Brad
Subject:	FW:

Attached is the file w/add'l info.  According to our records, Kara Lauer is a Sr Spec; however, the file you sent indicates she is a Spec.  Please read the detailed info at the bottom of the spreadsheet which indicates how the Recommended Bonuses were derived.

Kari Oquinn
713-853-9134
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richter, Brad
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 9:40 AM
To:	Oquinn, Kari
Subject:

Here is the file.  Please call my cell phone if you have questions.

Thank you,
Brad Richter
713-594-0220


Going with the old hyphen huh???  How corporate of you.

Hey, we got the beer.  Thanks alot.  Did customs give you a hard time for
bringing a bunch of booze back?  Talk to you soon.
PL


i am sure that girl courtney walker would like to share some special memories also


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 10:35
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Corporate Payroll @ ENRON                           01/29/2001 10:45 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Eligible Enron Employees United States
cc:
Subject: New Employee Service ) Turbo Tax

As tax season rapidly approaches, we are pleased to announce a new W-2
employee service.  If you plan to file your personal income taxes through
TurboTax 2000 (Intuit's personal tax filing software) you will be able to
automatically download your W-2 information into the appropriate TurboTax
forms directly over the Internet for free.

Enron has chosen to provide this service to help speed the processing time
and accuracy of your return while supporting paperless processing.

More information regarding this service is listed below or visit
www.probusinesstaxes.com to find out more about the TurboTax software and
Web-based filing service.

Employee Fact Sheet: ProBusiness/Intuit W-2 service

Q.  What is the Automated Tax Return (ATR) service?
A. Intuit Inc., makers of the popular Quicken TurboTax tax preparation and
filing software, have launched a new Automated Tax Return (ATR) service to
simplify tax preparation for TurboTax users. ATR allows users of TurboTax tax
preparation and filing software to import tax information from multiple
sources such as employers, brokerage houses, and mutual fund companies
directly into the correct TurboTax forms over the Internet.  Since our
payroll tax provider, ProBusiness, has partnered with Intuit to provide this
service, you will be able to electronically download your individual W-2 data
from ProBusiness directly into TurboTax through the Internet for free. Also,
as part of this program, you can receive a  5% discount on all TurboTax and
Quicken products including shipping and handling (go to
www.probusinesstaxes.com for more information).

Q. So how does it work?
A. Embedded in each version of TurboTax 2000 (both the software and web
application) is a series of screens that will ask whether your employer
allows you to automatically download your data into TurboTax.  To use the
free service, simply answer "yes" then select our payroll tax provider,
ProBusiness, from a drop-down list of providers which includes ProBusiness,
PeopleSoft, Ceridian, and seemyw2.com.  Validate your request by entering
your social security number and W-2 box one data and your W-2 data will
automatically transfer via the Internet into the appropriate locations in the
TurboTax form.

Q. Is this a secure transaction?
A.  Intuit,s TurboTax ATR service combines Open Financial Exchange (OFX), the
standard technology used in e-finance, with 128-bit military-grade encryption
to create an advanced security protocol that ensures the highest level of
security and confidentiality when obtaining financial data to populate your
TurboTax form over the Internet.

Q. How do I participate in this program?
A.  Only employees using Intuit,s TurboTax 2000 tax preparation and filing
software can take advantage of this Web-based ATR service.  TurboTax software
and the ATR Web-based filing service can be accessed at
www.probusinesstaxes.com.

Q. What if I already own TurboTax 2000(does this still work?
A. Yes, all copies of TurboTax 2000 contain the Automated Tax Return service
option.

Q. Overall what are the Benefits to me?
A.  Using the ATR service provided by Intuit and ProBusiness, you can:
? Increase your probability of accurate filing.
? Eliminate the need to manually enter your W-2 information and other
financial data.
? Increase the overall speed of tax filing.


I am fine with the markup Herman provided below.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Manis, Herman
Sent: Monday, May  21, 2001 2:39 PM
To: Carnahan, Kathleen; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa; Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Form of Memorandum of Option

See comments therein.

 << File: FORM of Memorandum of Option (2001).doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Carnahan, Kathleen
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa; Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Mann, Kay
Subject: Form of Memorandum of Option

Attached is a copy of our proposed Memorandum of Option that we would like to
use for our land options.  The Memorandum of Option will be recorded in the
real property records in the county and state where the property is situated,
and may need to be modified (as to form only) to comply with each state's
particular recording requirements.

Please let us know of your comments.

Thank you.

Kathleen

 << File: FORM of Memorandum of Option (2001).doc >>


Richard, attached are (1) a rough transcript of the first day of Sticker's
deposition and (2) a memo from me summarizing the highlights of the testimony.

Looking forward to seeing you later this week in New York, leave me a
voicemail or e-mail when you know when it will happen.

Steve

 <<Stickler 9.25.txt>>  <<depsum.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - Stickler 9.25.txt
 - depsum.doc


Attached is a summary of several recent SoCalGas advice letters.  AL 3096, dealing with various rate adjustments, may be of interest.
Happy Holidays!

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
02:47 PM ---------------------------

LCJO@dynegy.com on 11/10/2000 10:39:21 AM
To: TJRO@dynegy.com, JJDA@dynegy.com, GGHA@dynegy.com, SAHA@dynegy.com,
LJx4@swbell.net, johns@amerexenergy.com, sandra.f.brawner@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: good for a CLEAN LAUGH

DON'T WORRY....NOTHING DISTASTEFUL HERE.  VERY FUNNY THOUGH.

---------------------- Forwarded by Lance C Jordan/HOU/Dynegy on 11/10/2000
10:37 AM ---------------------------

Andrew Benanti <ABenanti@prebon.com> on 11/09/2000 02:39:53 PM

To:   "'lcjo@dynegy.com'" <lcjo@dynegy.com>
cc:

Subject:  FW: good for a laugh

----------
From:  Terry Simmons
Sent:  Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:33 PM
To:  Andrew Benanti; Kevin Amerio
Subject:  FW: good for a laugh

----------
From:     Ken Newman[SMTP:knewman@falconsafety.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:knewman@falconsafety.com]>
Reply To:      knewman@falconsafety.com <mailto:knewman@falconsafety.com>
Sent:     Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:33 PM
To:  Bud Katzmann (E-mail); Bud Pellechia (E-mail); Dave Kells (E-mail);
Dave Savino (E-mail); Dean Mitchell (E-mail); Harold Newman (E-mail); Holly
Westra (E-mail); Jeff Rehling (E-mail); Jim Lomker (E-mail); Jim Laudenbach
(E-mail); John Colarusso (E-mail); John Schuberth (E-mail); Ken Niese
(E-mail); Michelle Wollman (E-mail); Paul Klein (E-mail); Pete Joachim
(E-mail); Rich Stout (E-mail); Steve Johnson (E-mail); T Pier - Work
(E-mail); Terry Gutshall (E-mail); Terry Simmons (E-mail); Tom Silvia
(E-mail); ballstriker@aol.com <mailto:ballstriker@aol.com>
Subject:  FW: good for a laugh

 <<funny_pics.doc>>

If you don't laugh at these you need a vacation!
-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle Symonds [mailto:MLSYMONDS@klsm.com]
<mailto:[mailto:MLSYMONDS@klsm.com]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:02 PM
To: Diane Estabrooks (E-mail); George Soukas (E-mail); Ken Newman
(E-mail); Marie Stagnitti (E-mail); Matt Blasick (E-mail); Michael
Gibbons (E-mail); Bethany A. Curry; Megan Forney
Subject: good for a laugh

 <<funny_pics.doc>>

Some of these are pretty funny!

(See attached file: funny_pics.doc)

 - funny_pics.doc


FYI - the following list reflects old ECT master and no master counterparties
by volume (not necessarily exposure).  Sara

Tanya:  do you want all of these names on the legal/credit list?
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000 10:08 AM -----

	Jefferson D Sorenson
	06/02/2000 09:27 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Top 20

see if this will help
---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
06/02/2000 09:26 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Diane Anderson                           06/01/2000 05:19 PM

To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Top 20

Attached please find a spreadsheet of the top 20 counterparties (by number
of deals) with whom we do not have an ISDA Master Agreement, for the
period Jan-May '00.


Group,

As you are all well aware, we must be flat in enpower and caps position
manager at the beginning and end of each shift.  This is extremely important
for ourselves and other groups on the floor.
Since Friday, we have been flat in position manager only 2 out of 5 times at
8 in the morning the following day.  On Monday, Risk could not run its
reports until AFTER noon.  On Tuesday, we delayed the entire floor again.
And on Thursday, Risk ran its reports based on information from RT that we
were flat for the 13th.  We were not flat and I did not know of the problem
until preschedulers brought it to the floors attention.  This is not good.

Over the past week we have experienced numerous complex cuts and many members
of the group have put in long hours and worked diligently to try to balance
these cuts out.  I recognize and appreciate this hard work.  However, at the
end of the day we must be flat.  If you have questions, it is your
responsibility to ask.  I do not want to call group members back in after
their shift is over if we are not flat, but I will have little other choice
if this continues.

Bill


Attached are a revised org chart and a revised org memo.  Work form these
drafts to incororate the handwritten changes I have given you.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/16/2000 07:23
AM ---------------------------
From: Lance Schuler-Legal@ECT on 08/15/2000 05:14 PM
To: Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gail
Brownfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Robert H
George/SA/Enron@Enron, John Lamb/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Wallace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Frank Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Nutt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles Cheek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aaron Brown/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, James L Bouillion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cullen
Duke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Schedule for the Schedules

The current schedule contemplates sending a draft of the Disclosure Schedules
to Skadden by the end of the day on Friday.  Please provide any remaining
comments to the draft Schedules as soon as you can.  I realize there will
still be some holes, as we continue to negotiate the Purchase and Sale
Agreement.  No doubt it would help to have the Appendices to the Purchase and
Sale Agreement completed, or say maybe a dollar amount or two completed in
the Definitions section.  Thanks for all the help.  Lance.


A meeting to discuss storage simulation and pipeline flow analysis.


A Gas Risk Management Staff meeting is scheduled this morning Thursday, January 17th, at 10:00 AM in conference room ECS 5075.

Thank you,

AC


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000
02:49 PM ---------------------------

"Edgeworth, Brian" <brian.edgeworth@gs.com> on 11/06/2000 01:46:21 PM
To: "'lavorato@enron.com'" <lavorato@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: GS Research (Argentina, Brazil, Latin America)

>  <<Argentina.pdf>>   <<Portfolio.pdf>>   <<Brazil.pdf>>
> <<LatinAmerica.pdf>>   <<September.pdf>>
>
>
>
>

 - Argentina.pdf
 - Portfolio.pdf
 - Brazil.pdf
 - LatinAmerica.pdf
 - September.pdf


We have a highly negotiated Annex B and B-1 which Samantha has just revised.
She will send it to you.  It is not to be used ever again (unless we agree
once again).
I can't remember where we left off on the confirm format.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Please get this info to me and I will pass it on to AA.  Thanks.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
02:52 PM ---------------------------

Sharon Smith@ENRON
11/06/2000 05:14 PM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Monthly Gas Testing

In order for us to complete our monthly gas testing, please provide the
following items.

 P&L top sheet for the last day of August.  Additionally, if the majority of
the P&L pertains to curve shift, please provide the P&L top pages for five
of  the  largest days including the Curve Shift Reports.

  Central Firm
  Central Intra-Month

 P&L top sheet for the last day of September.  Additionally, if the majority
of the P&L pertains to curve shift, please provide the P&L top pages for five
of  the largest days including the Curve Shift Reports.

  Central Intra-Month
  FT - West
  FT-Northwest
  Mgmt- West
  West Gas Daily
  Storage (Curve shift reports only)

Thank you in advance for your help.  If you have any questions, please
contact me at 5-7346.

Sharon


?
 - ATT00058.gif


Always.  By the way, did you have further thoughts about a call to develop a comprehensive Nevada strategy?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Are we still friends??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

Thanks.  I hate it when I sound petulant.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Kaufman, Paul; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

My fault for not making it clear that you should have been in the loop.  We will send out a message across the board to help with this.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

This is going to sound like empire building. But I need to know what we're doing with PGE.  I don't need to participate in the calls--but I do need to know.  The PGE folks need to have confidence that I'm aware of our positions and plans.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE: PGE Imbalance Charge

We are having a conference call tomorrow with PGE.  They did not decide anything on the last conference call after I told them why Enron retail in the East likes the Duquense type imbalance (no bandwidth, thus no penalties-- imbalances settle at verifiable system lambda).  John Malowney of EPMI west desk likes the bandwidth, but we are discussing it further since it has created problems for the East EES desk (due to the penalties associated with being outside the bandwidth).  John likes the PGE proposal to settle at an index price, but PGE is reconsidering that aspect.

Unfortunately, I don't know of any TPs that allow a bandwidth without penalties.

Let me know if you want to participate in the call.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	PGE Imbalance Charge

Christi --

What's the latest on the PGE imbalance method??

Jim


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001
07:57 AM ---------------------------
From: Marie Hejka@ENRON on 04/17/2001 11:16 PM
To: Sue Vasan/Enron@EnronXGate, Rita Hartfield/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Travers
Jr/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Ganapathy
Ramesh/Enron@EnronXGate, Amy Oberg/HOU/EES@EES, Kate Cole/Enron@EnronXGate,
Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Earlene O'Connell/Enron@EnronXGate, Jim
Gearhart/Enron@EnronXGate, Allan Sommer/Enron@EnronXGate, David Gossett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jon Adler/Enron@EnronXGate, Heather
Purcell/Enron@EnronXGate, LaDonna Dervin/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen
Pope-Sance/HOU/EES@EES, Andrea V Reed/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judith Schlesinger/Enron@EnronXGate, Chuck
Hahn/SFO/EES@EES, Cindy Shaffer/Enron@EnronXGate, Keith Halpin/HOU/EES@EES,
Alan Marsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Garion Dillingham/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen K
Heathman/Enron@EnronXGate, Cherylene Westbrook/Enron@EnronXGate, Sharron
Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Wasaff/Enron@EnronXGate, Brandon
Rigney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karina Prizont/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Regina Karsolich/Enron@EnronXGate, Leslie D Dever-McCauley/HOU/EES@EES,
Candi Woods/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Anthony Mends/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, john.c.watson@us.pwcglobal.com,
patricia.guzman@us.pwcglobal.com, csbrown@us.pwcglobal.com,
thomas.degeest@us.pwcglobal.com, Krista Reed/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: Reminder - EnronAnywhere Portal Project Meeting

You are scheduled to attend the EnronAnywhere Portal Project Meeting.
When:   Wednesday, April 18, 2001
Where: EB50M Dining Room
Time:    12:00 - 4:00
Lunch will be served.
Thank you in advance for helping us to create ONE Enron.  Your attendance and
participation is certain to make this project a huge success.
Call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Marie Hejka
EnronAnywhere
3 9698

P.S.  Note, we decided not to send a pre-workshop assignment.
See you there.


These are my notes on flowing gas.  Tetco will be the problem pipeline.  I called my rep again and asked her to seriously look into it.  I'm thinking worse case is they will need either cash or a letter of credit for about $1,000,000.00.  I'm using the following formula

	MDQ (22,000 dth) x 20 days x $ some cashout price

They may cut back on the number of days but the cashout price is the problem.  It's a moving target and I expect prices to go up.  I think that if we just agreed to give them a letter of credit for $1 mill and then prepay for any actual expenses we incur, we could build our reputation on the pipeline, at least until we get rid of these deals.  If all the gas flows like it should, we should never have any actual expenses on any of these pipelines for the Keyspan deal.

Who knows what volumes are going to be?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 3:30 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Greif, Donna; Lamadrid, Victor; Barbe, Robin
Cc:	Garza, Maria; Kelly, Katherine L.; Germany, Chris; Concannon, Ruth; Olinger, Kimberly S.
Subject:	Transportation notes for Feb

I have released the Boston Gas capacity on Tennessee, contract 29667, and Iroquois, contract 1250-08, to Boston Gas, non-recallable, subject to bid (per Boston Gas's request), for Feb 1st for one month only.

Other transport notes;

To serve the Lilco deal, we need supply on Texas Eastern, Tennessee, and Transco.

Texas Eastern is trying to decide how to handle the cash out exposure.  There is no commodity expense on the type of agreement I am requesting but there is the possibility of cash out.  I think the exposure to Texas Eastern is minimal and it could be that Texas Eastern just wants to be difficult to work with.

We can still flow gas on our Tennessee pooling contract.

We need an IT contract on Transco.  Transco requires a prepayment or a letter of credit using the following formula, MDQ x 90 days x max it rate from Zone 1 to Zone 6 ($.5169).  I believe the Lilco volume on Transco is about 21,000 dth/day.  Therefore, we would need to give Transco a letter of credit for about $977,000.00.

I also believe that we could do a buy/sale on Transco and Texas Eastern and bypass the pooling process.

Donna, Victor,
I like to keep scheduling informed of all activity on my pipes.  I plan on copying Ruth, Kathy, Maria, and Kim on my emails.  Who should I include from scheduling?

Thanks


WDriver@KSLAW.com


Susan:  Please forward your two emails (re:  HS Resources,et al) to Bill
Bradford and John Suttle.  SS

	Susan Flynn
	07/06/2000 07:35 PM

		 To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron,
Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron,
Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yolanda
Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Assignment and Novation Agreement between HS Resources, Inc., HS
Energy Services, Inc. and ENA

 We received the executed Assignment and Novation Agreement between HS
Resources, Inc., HS Energy Services, Inc. and ENA, effective at 12:00 p.m. on
June 30, 2000.  Under the terms of this agreement, HS Resources, Inc.
assigns  to HS Energy Services, Inc. all of its right, title and interest in
certain Transactions it has entered into with ENA.  Such Transactions will be
governed by the ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2000, between ENA
and  HS Energy Services, Inc.       Copies will be distributed.

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490


I'm sorry for not resonding sooner - did this get resolved? I see Duke Energy
Trading and Marketing in the deal.

Kate

Rhonda L Denton
03/28/2001 04:46 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 562774

Please see if this is Duke Power, a division of Duke Energy or should it be
Duke Energy Trading and Marketing.  Thanks.


I would like the following pipelines and the following points on the map we
discussed the other day.  If possible, I would also like to see the zone
boundaries for Transco, Tennessee, and Iroq.

Thanks
Chris G.
3-4743

Pipeline
Iroquois
Nattional Fuel
CNG
Transco
Tenn
Algonquin

Interconnect   Point
TCPL/IROQ   Waddington
Iroq/Algo -    Brookfield
Iroq/CNG   Canajoharie
Iroq/Tenn   Wright
CNG/Trco   Leidy
CNG/Tetc   Leidy
CNG/Tenn   Morrisville
CNG/Tenn   Sabinsville
Tenn    St 219
Tenn/Trco   Rivervale
Tenn/TCPL   Niagara
Tenn    White Plains
Troc/Algo   Centerville
Trco/Nat Fuel   Leidy
Nat Fuel/TCPL   Niagara


Dear Eric,  The final Federal Energy Regulatory Commission meeting of 2001 will dominate our coverage from the Washington bureau on Wednesday.  The agenda is packed, and includes discussion on the California refunds case and a proposal to change accounting standards for energy companies.  Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says we should also hear more on the development of Regional Transmission Organizations at the meeting.   Lawmakers are preparing to leave town for the holidays. Republicans and Democrats are still trying to reach a deal on an economic stimulus package before they head home - so far there's no agreement.  We'll follow these stories from the Washington bureau on Wednesday, and have more on possible Congressional action in the wake of the Enron implosion.    Enron's collapse is affecting companies across the board, forcing some to reassess their balance sheets.  On Wednesday from Houston, Jacobs Consultancy Managing Director Joe Ramsey will discuss how they account for their bottom lines.  Join us during the 10:00 a.m. ET newscast for the Ramsey interview.   Director of the University of Houston Energy Institute Michelle Foss, Ph.D. , talks about what's next in the wake of Enron's fall.   Foss will join us from Houston during the 3:00 p.m. ET newscast on Wednesday.     Also on Wednesday, West Coast Correspondent Kym McNicholas speaks with Independent Energy Producers Association Executive Director Jan Smutny-Jones.  Smutny-Jones talks about RTOs in the West and his hopes that Wednesday's FERC meeting can bring some guidance to the region.  Log on for reports from the West Coast bureau on Wednesday.    Closing Prices for Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2001    Crude: $19.36/bbl +$0.14   Unleaded: $0.5504/gallon +$0.0049   Heating Oil: $0.5469/gallon +$0.0088   Gas: $2.657/mmBtu - $0.031   We'll check back in with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and Alaron Trading Vice President Phil Flynn on Wednesday.  Flynn will discuss the relationship between OPEC and non-OPEC producers and where he thinks the war on terrorism will lead.  Don't miss Flynn at noon ET on Wednesday.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  Real Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


Background

As you may remember, in September John Miller called to find out if we want to sell Willow Farms.  At that time, I told him I would find out from the group.

In December, he called again, and we missed one another, but I finally told, via voicemail, that we would entertain and consider and offer to buy Willow Farms but that we would not consider any kind of partnership or joint venture and we wanted a straight sale.  I then told him that if he was still interested that he should give it his best shot, and we would consider whatever he sent us.

My Discussion of 1/30/02

John called me back on 1/17/02, and I returned his call today.  I told John the following:

1.  The group is still interested in whatever he would propose, but I wanted to make some things clear so he didn't think we were wasting his time.

2.  I told him that in reality, all don't want to sell, but 2 out of 3 do, and I won't stand in the way of a satisfactory sale.

3.  We still do not want to participate in any development or sale, the price cannot be dependent on success of sales and a sale must be all or nothing.  I told him that I could not agree to any sale that allowed a "cherry picking" of good lots and left other lots behind, because once sales started it puts pressure to complete the development or else all prices suffer under perception of "undesirable" development.

4.  I told him that the only reason we are having this discussion now is that due to the property tax revaluations the carrying costs of the lots has increased.  Therefore, any sale must be structured to take that carrying cost pressure off, hence, a sale of all or nothing.

After stating these ground rules, I told him that I would understand if he wasn't interested, but that if he was, he should just give us his "best" proposal.

He then asked how many lots, and I told him 8 with a 9th possible, but owned only by my mom.  He said let's keep that out for now.  I also told him that within the next 2 years, the lot with the house might also be sold, but that that was up to my parents.

He then said the following:

1.  He is interested too in reducing his risk, so he might be interested in deal where he would guarantee the purchase of 2 lots every year for 4 years.  It would be a guarantee.

2.  He asked me if we had any idea of the value we wanted for the lots.  I said there are different ideas and no consensus, so I said I had no number to give him.  I reiterated to him that he knows more than me (since I'm just a lawyer in Denver) and he should give it his best shot.

I then commented to him on his suggestion:

1.  I told him that any deal that did not ensure sale of all lots was just not acceptable, so the extent of his guarantee of 2 lots per year had to be firm as to 8 lots over 4 years to even be considered.  I told him then it would appear just to be a means of financing the sale (not reducing his risk) and allowing us to keep title to the unsold lots rather than tie them up with a mortgage.

2.  I told him that his proposal may not be worth considering if it allowed the kind of cherry picking I referred to above and the kind of pressure to pick up the remaining lots at lower prices that I referred to above. I told him to consider these concerns in his proposal.

3.  I told him that because what brought us to the table now is the increased carrying costs of the lots, any proposal by him that still puts pressure on us to carry these lots and expend finds, will not be well received.  For example, I told him that I have some concern that any 2 lot per year deal will result in immediately increased carrying costs resulting from revaluation of the remaining lots for property tax purposes based upon the first purchases.  I told him that that would not be well received by us.

How We Ended It

I told him that I wanted to make clear my concerns so that he doesn't waste his time and feel resentful if we reject his offer. I told him that I wanted to be above board and that my reputation was important to me. He said he understood and appreciated the details.

He said he will put a proposal together, and I told him to send it to Leonard at the office, since I am not good at being the middleman.

Let me know if I goofed up or did ok.

- Dan
1/30/02