Sunday works for me, and we can meet in my office.  But if it's OK, 10 AM
works better for me.  Let me know.

And Anil has very graciously offered to coordinate the power point
presentation for the project.  And having worked with Anil on another project
that required power point, I can vouch that he is at wizard with the
technology.

Best,
Jeff

	Anil Sama <asama@yahoo.com>
	04/16/2001 07:10 PM

		 To: "Vavrek, Carolyn \(US - San Francisco\)" <cvavrek@deloitte.com>,
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, "Guinney, Mark" <Mark_Guinney@watsonwyatt.com>
		 cc: Anil Sama <asama@yahoo.com>
		 Subject: RE: RE: OAT Valuation Model

Sunday 9AM works for me. Jeff, can we meet at your office?
"Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)" <cvavrek@deloitte.com> wrote:
I will cancel with Diane for my commitment during Thursday break, so we can
definitely meet then. How does meeting on Sunday morning work for everyone?
Say around 9am-ish?
- Carolyn

Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105

phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: cvavrek@deloitte.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Guinney, Mark
Cc: "Anil Sama" ; "Vavrek; Carolyn (US - San Francisco)" ;
"Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com"
Subject: Re:RE: OAT Valuation Model

Our schedules make it messy. I can come over tomorrow during the break if
Anil and Carolyn want to meet. Mark, if you want to hunker down with the
model tomorrow, you sh! ould feel free. The only thing about Thursday is
that Carolyn's got a commitment with Dian. Can we talk about meeting this
weekend? I can be flexible.

Best,
Jeff

"Guinney, Mark"

wyatt.com> \"Vavrek; Carolyn (US - San
Francisco)\" "
, "

04/16/2001 01:31 PM \"Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com\"
"

cc:

Subject: Re:RE: OAT
Valuation Model

Guys,

We are not going to be able to meet during the week since we all have class
every day of the week. We'll have to talk on Thursday and again Sat. or
Sun.
Come prepared so we can be efficient.

Later

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: RE: OAT Valuation Model
Author: "Anil Sama" <?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = SMTP />
Date: 04/16/2001 5:24 PM

Nice job Jeff!

I can meet Tuesday evening, Sat PM, or Sunday.

-Anil

"Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)" wrote:

Jeff - Thanks for putting so much work into this. Excellent job!

I agree that we should figure out when we can meet again. I can meet
tonight, during break on Tuesday and basically anytime on Saturday or
Sunday. During break on Thursday I volunteered to help Diane with a new
student's reception, but I can cancel that if need be. What does everyone
else's schedule look like?

Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105

phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail:! cvavrek@deloitte.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 8:56 AM
To: 'asama@yahoo.com'; 'Mark Guinney'; Cvavrek
Subject: OAT Valuation Model

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/16/2001 10:53 AM -----

Jeff Dasovich

Sent by: Jeff To: "Sama, Anil"

Dasovich cc: "'asama@yahoo.com'"
,
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, "'Mark
Guinney'"

04/16/2001 Subject: OAT Valuation
Model(Document link:
10:52 AM Jeff Dasovich)

OK folks. It's about 80% of the way there. My brains are oozing out
looking at cells, so I want to get this around so Mark can get started on
refining assumptions and other folks can examine as well. I'll continue to
check it and de-bug it. Mark, you and I should talk, too. (You'll note
that at this point, the valuation is in the $30s, so there's work to! do.)
Apologies in advance for any errors (and I'm sure they're there).

If anyone has any questions on the model, just let me know.

I think we ought to get together to meet this week as much as possible to
start getting the power point presentation together. And perhaps we should
think about meeting this weekend?

In the meantime, I'm pulling together the data on Buffet (Berkshire
Hathaway) stock performance, etc., and will also do the financial ratios,
including Dupont, for OAT.

Does this work for folks? Other thoughts?

Best,
Jeff
(See attached file: OAT Valuation 0416.xls)

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any act! ion based on it, is strictly prohibited.

_____

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Personal Address

- Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.Syun

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Lynn-OUT OF OFFICE

Date:		2/26/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


lname=Causholli
fname=Monika
Vac #=
nationality=ALBANIAN
address  =
permanent Address  =
Office phone=713 345 1510
fax=
email=mcausholli@hotmail.com
duration=
gender=FEMALE
dday=09
dmonth=11
dyear=1975
marital=Married
residence=no
country  of residence  =
change=no
country of nationality   =
relatives=no
names of relatives  =
language=Albanian
language  =English- High, High, High
PCskills  =Excel, Word, PowerPoint
Education=Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Degree: Bachelor of Science in Finance
Minor: International Relations
GPA 3.9

High School Graduation: June 1994 Tirana, Albania
publications=
employmentrecord=Financial Analyst/Researcher      Enron North America/Industrial Markets
                                                                           Houston, TX 6/01- Present

Supervisor Karen Carter
Reasons for Leaving: Company is going bankrupt

?	Analyzed the financial condition of pulp and paper companies by carefully reading through their financial statements and drawing the conclusion of their financial health. Based on the results of the analysis, prepared company reports for the origination team.
?	Supported the team of originators and traders by gathering data on the pulp market, preparing presentations, doing analysis on the prices and other market variables. Wrote a weekly newsletter with the most important information that included a market commentary. Built and completed the spreadsheets that contain all the market data for pulp. The spreadsheets helped the spot/financial traders to evaluate market conditions and make trading decisions.

Real Time Trader/Analyst              Enron North America
                                                                           Portland, Oregon 6/00-6/01

Supervisor: Bill Williams

?	Researched the variables that affect the hourly electricity market including temperatures, planned and forced outages of generating units, loads and CISO expost prices resulting in an informed opinion about that day?s trading options.
?	Looked for opportunities to create value based on the research. Raised up to $100,000 a day by following the market closely, taking advantage of the arbitrage opportunities between the different markets, and making use of transmission available to send power to various points.
?	Ran the El Paso Electric Utility during the off peak hours and weekends by matching the load (demand) with the supply and making the necessary decisions to run the system reliably by following the WSCC requirements on spin and nonspin requirements.

Summer Intern/Analyst Program             Enron Capital & Trade
Portland, Oregon 6/99-9/99
Supervisor: Tim Heizenraider

?	Researched and graphed the historical temperatures for the Pacific Northwest, the Desert Southwest, and Rocky mountain and tried to find the correlation between the temperatures and energy load (demand).
?	Co-designed the load-forecasting model for the Pacific Northwest, Desert Southwest and Rocky Mountains in a course of three months.
?	Compiled the daily information for the term and cash traders including the historical temperatures graphs for California, daily forecasted load, and gas prices.

present=no
reference1  =James Nielsen; Professor of Finance; Oregon State University; Oregon State University, College Of Business, 200 Bexell, Corvallis, OR 97331 Tel. 541 737 3226
reference2  =David Allan; Director of the Fundamentals Group, Enron Industrial Markets 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002. Tel. 713 345 2644
reference3  =Richard Clinton, Professor of International Relations, Oregon State University, College of Liberal Arts, 207 Social Science Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331. Tel 541 737 6246
criminal=no
criminal record  =
agency=no
applicationdate=Nov 21, 2001


New Power Products on ICE!!

On Friday, October 26 IntercontinentalExchange will launch Hourly Power as well as 2nd, 3rd, 4th Week strips.  The Hourly Power will be offered for all the West Power hubs and for PJM in the East.  These new markets will have to be manually added to portfolios.  The 2nd, 3rd, 4th Week strips will be available for all Power hubs currently available on the Exchange and will be automatically added to portfolios containing the Next Day strip for a particular hub.

Credit must be set under the Financial Power credit filter for the PJM Hourly and under the Power credit filter for the West Hourly markets.  Hourly Power markets can be arranged in chronological order in the Portfolio Editor window.  Please call your ICE representative if assistance is needed.

Any other questions or concerns should be directed to our 24 hour Help Desk at  770-738-2101.


EB32c2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Lopez, Rumaldo </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RLOPEZ3>
X-To:
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Schwieger, Jim\Schwieger, Jim\Calendar
X-Origin: SCHWIEGER-J
X-FileName: Schwieger, Jim.pst

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:=20

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: =0E
Date: ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????=
????????????????
Subject:


yes,   can you attend the lunch tomorrow.

Thanks, Karen.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	RE: Trading Track Interviews

Karen,

I was out last week.  Do you still need any help?

Mat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:13 PM
To:	Ames, Chuck; Bajwa, Bilal; Ballato, Russell; Gim, Steve; Heu, Mog; Padron, Juan; Pimenov, Vladi; Plachy, Denver; Schiavone, Paul; Shim, Elizabeth; Smith, Matt; Wagner, Joseph; Wolfe, Jason; Yawapongsiri, Virawan
Cc:	Engler, Adrianne
Subject:	Trading Track Interviews

All,

We are scheduling Interviews for new candidates to the Trading Track, next Wedesday 30th May.     I am looking for volunteers to particpate in this event.

Agenda:

Tuesday: 29th:		Dinner with five external candidates Tuesday night.

Wednesday 30th:

11.00 - 12.30		Office tour - Trading Floor/Gas Control Room - five external candidates
12.30 - 1.30 		Lunch with all 15 candidates (comination of internal and external).

I need 3 of you to attend dinner on the 29th, 2 of your to faciliate the office tour and give insight to the operations and would like for all of you to attend the lunch.

Pls advise on both at your earliest conveneince.

Rgds, Karen.


Set up w/Sally on 6/14 jar


I'm in.  We'll get started in a couple of months.  Hopefully no sooner!
Thanks,
mike


Gerald, pls review economics sheet. Pls advise if any changes. NOTE: Make sure you are ok with the disclaimer language.

PLS review ASAP as I need to send out now.

BT


I saw a picture today, and now i know who you remind me of!  Sue Landwehr:
talks like marge, looks like elle mcpherson.


$1MM.  Could be another $45,000 because of interest rate decreases.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:06 AM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	RE: CMS Agreement/Huber

Good news on the CMS Deal... How much will this be?

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 5:45 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	CMS Agreement/Huber

I have received the signed CMS Agreement.  I have signed it and returned it and we will be booking the earnings over the next couple of days.  Huber is trying to figure out how they will structure the purchases at the wellhead for royalty purposes.  They are doing this as part of their counterproposal to us.  I do not have very high expectations for this deal happening in the 3rd quarter.  However, Brian Stone will be stuck in a boat with just me and a guide for a total of 8 hours on Wed and Thurs. and I hope to make significant progress in that time.

Mark


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		1/6/2001
Task Start Date:	1/6/2001


That was incredibly fast.


Good Morning,

Exciting News!!  We now have a new Portland Web based IT incident & tracking
application to replace the existing Westdeskitissues.mde Access application.
The new Web based solution adds several key enhancements that will hopefully
improve IT response time and improve our communications back to you when
problems are resolved.

Here are some of the key enhancments:
1.  Ability to query outstanding & resolved issues.
2.  IT problem/resolution knowledge base.
3.  Web page that displays important IT contact information.
4.  Automatic email notifications to resolution team members.
4.  And much, much, more.

For those of you who may be new to the office, or may have forgotten about
the old Westitissues.mde application.  This application is continuously
monitored by the production support team for infrastructure (PC's, Monitors,
terminal-server, LAN, WAN, etc) and application (Enpower, Portcalc, CAPS,
etc.) problems or enhancements requested by users.  This database is also
summarized to capture metrics which are then used to evaluate the performance
of the IT group.

Here are the steps to using the new West Desk Problem Tracking System:

New Login:

1. Go to http://westdesksupport/
2. Click the Login button towards the bottom of the page.
3. In the UserName Box, Enter:  ITWD.
4. For the Password type in: Password.
5. On the next Screen, fill out all the information. (Only certain fields are
required, but filling out everything is preferable)
6. After Clicking the submit button, you are going to be asked to login with
the new username and password you created in the New User Area.
7. Upon submitting, you will come to the main index page.

Adding a WorkOrder:

1. On the Main index page, click on the link add incident to log under the
heading of West Desk Links.
2. Fill out as much information as possible. For IT Contact, please enter
appropriate contact, or if you are not sure, select mtully.
3. Select Priority. (This may be changed by IT)
4. Submit form.

Note: For the description and response fields, you may use html tags for the
formatting of text for display.

The rest is pretty self explanatory. If you hover your cursor over a link or
picture or text box, a texttip will appear and tell you what that link or
textbox is for.

Thanks,

Mike Tully
Trading Floor Support

P.S. When entering a incident, there are two different types of "NEW
Requests". One is New Request (Problem). This is used for reporting an error
or problem with an application. The other is New Request (Enhancement) which
is used for requesting an enhancement to an application.


The Chicago Stock Exchange Presents Its Lifetime Achievement Award to Joe
Ricketts, Ameritrade Chairman and Founder

********************************

********************************

View complete article at:
http://www.stockselector.com/newsarticle.asp?symbol=AMTD&article=41622371

AMERITRADE HLDG CP CL A  8.938

CHICAGO, Dec 13, 2000 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The Chicago Stock Exchange's
(CHX) Board of Directors today will present its Lifetime Achievement Award to
Joe Ricketts, chairman and founder of Ameritrade Holding Corporation (Nasdaq:
AMTD).

The CHX instituted the Lifetime Achievement Award in

Other Companies Involved:
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

To unsubscribe, please go to
http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?portnumber=1

, Copyright 1998-99, StockSelector.com


When: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:30 PM-3:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: tbd

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Update on Status, review critical assumptions, strategize on economics


Sorry Vince

One must have got away!

Will contact Dan shortly.

Conrad

At 08:04 AM 6/5/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Conrad,
>
>Thanks for your message.
>
>There are 3 papers Enron contributed to the last MEPR.
>
>There is also another paper on electricity I contributed to the "red book"
>on US
>power markets, as well as a paper or credit risk management, and a paper
>on weather derivatives. All these papers included in other RISK books were
>written by Enron
>employees.
>
>We would like them included as well, if technically possible.
>
>
>I think that offering other energy related books through our site, in
>addition to MEPR2,
>is fine, but I would leave the decision to Dan Diamond, who is responsible
>for the project.
>
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>Conrad Gardner <conrad@risk.co.uk> on 06/05/2000 07:08:36 AM
>
>To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Enron site/MEPR2
>
>
>>Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 13:02:02
>>To: Vince Kaminski
>>From: Conrad Gardner <conrad@risk.co.uk>
>>
>>Dear Vince
>>
>>Thanks for the call and email on Friday. I will contact Masuyuki and
>follow
>it from there.
>>
>>Regarding the Enron site, I think it is absolutely fine to put up the two
>Enron chapters (I'll provide pdfs), and prevent any customer leakages from
>your site by the use of "submit" buttons. As mentioned, I'll offer a 20%
>discount on MEPR2 to customers but would you be interested in some of other
>energy titles? - Please let me know.
>>
>>Many thanks
>>
>>Conrad Gardner
>>
>Head of Book Publishing
>Risk Books
>Haymarket House
>28-29 Haymarket
>London
>SW1Y 4RX
>Direct tel: +44 (020) 7 484 9750
>Main tel:+44 (020) 7 484 9700
>Fax: +44 (020) 7 484 9758
>e-mail: Conrad@risk.co.uk
>www.riskpublications.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Head of Book Publishing
Risk Books
Haymarket House
28-29 Haymarket
London
SW1Y 4RX
Direct tel: +44 (020) 7 484 9750
Main tel:+44 (020) 7 484 9700
Fax: +44 (020) 7 484 9758
e-mail: Conrad@risk.co.uk
www.riskpublications.com


-----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Willis, Jim
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:13 PM
To:	Willis, Jim; Concannon, Ruth; Germany, Chris; Fitzwater, Loftus
Subject:	Boston Gas Deal
When:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:30 PM-4:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	3259 (Frank Vickers' Conference Room)

Ruth, Chris, & Fitz,

Frank Vickers has asked me to set up a meeting for us to discuss the Boston Gas situation - how we can restructure (upstream and/or downstream) the deal, what positions are struggling on the North American side, what is our current position, etc.   Ruth and Chris, the above-mentioned time is just a suggestion - Loftus and I are fairly flexible for the remainder of today and/or tomorrow - except 10:00 am and 2:00 pm tomorrow).  Please let me know if another time will work better for either of you.  Basically, we need you to please lay out for us some of the history behind the deal, address some of the issues mentioned previously, and help brainstorm how Loftus and I can go forward from this point.

Thanks very much for your help,

Jim Willis
ENA - East Gas Origination
(713) 853-7912
jim.willis@enron.com


Jim,

P. Love informed me that we should see a liquidation (QZ0764) in the Ontario
Region intended to offset an Interdesk deal between IM Ontario and IM New
England where we forced the purchase.  Looks like it was booked in TAGG
between FT-Ontario and FT-NY.

Can we find the liquidation and show in IM Ontario?

Thanks,
Greg


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/31/2000
02:24 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey Sherrick
08/31/2000 01:23 PM
To: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stephen Wallace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Horace Snyder/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Harper/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Warmath/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Carin Energy Rumor

FYI,   There is a rumor on Yahoo that Enron has bid for Carin Energy.  I have
talked with Jackie Gentle in our London Office who first heard the rumor and
we have confirmed that neither EGEP or the London office is pursuing such a
deal.  My guess is that it is either EOGR ( I know they are pursuing an Int'l
deal) or just a bad release.

jeff


Last Thursday, I made the first attached presentation to the FERC Staff at the
power marketer's meeting on the FERC's investigation of the wholesale market
in
the West (and in particular California).  Ellen Wolf (of Tabors Caramanis)
and I
created this presentation building on previous presentations by Tim Belden and
Dave Parquet.  In the presentation and the meeting we made the following
points:
   There isn't much FERC can do because the cause of the price spikes is not
in
   the wholesale market.  We discouraged FERC from taking any action that
would
   hurt the vibrant wholesale market in the California and the rest of the
West
   as well.
   High prices logically resulted from scarcity and if the Commission does
   anything it should (1) investigate whether market power was being exercised
   by any party and, (2) if necessary to protect the market (while still
   incenting needed generation) establish a price cap at a scarcity rent level
   equal to the price at which loads were willing to interrupt.
   The IOUs have not properly prepared for the risk of high prices caused by
   scarcity.  They have failed to hedge and have underscheduled their load,
   therefore having to fill a large percentage of their load at ISO real time
   prices.  My analogy was that this was like day trading your retirement fund
   as an asset allocation scheme.
   The market would function better if more information was provided to the
   market.
   The Commission should do whatever it can to incent participation by load.
To see the presentation, detach, save, and view in Powerpoint.  When you do,
you
will find there are many "hidden" slides that were not part of the oral
presentation but were provided to Staff in hard copy for additional
information.

According to the head of the investigation (Scott Miller), the staff got alot
more out of this meeting than Staff's previous meetings with the IOUs and the
generators.  Based on the numerous phone calls I've been getting, the Staff is
looking into the data we provided.

I have also attached a revised version of the presentation that Tim sent to
Scott Miller on Friday.  Tim's version conveys the same message but takes a
different approach to conveying the message.  On Friday, Tim talked to Scott
and
answered some additional questions.  Tim said that Enron is in favor of
eliminating the mandatory PX buying requirement and would like the IOUs to be
able to buy from Enron Online.  He also explained more fully the existence of
scarcity .
 (See attached file: August 24 presentation to FERC1.ppt)(See attached file:
FERC Presentation.ppt)

 - August 24 presentation to FERC1.ppt
 - FERC Presentation.ppt


Aimee,

PG&E's numbers are correct.

   Aimee Lannou                12/15/99 03:30 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Grant
Subject: tufco 11/99

Daren - I just received an updated tufco spreadsheet from Brian Biggs.  There
are still two days in question.  He shows 100.000 on the 23rd and 142.500 on
the 30th.  MOPS shows 20.000and 32.542, respectively.  Please let me know
which number is correct.

Thanks.

- Aimee


Dear Paul,
	Actually our intention is to have the meeting at Houston by second
week of June,01 because it might be a good occasion 	to visit the
terminal as well if possible & about the exact timing I'll keep you posted
once my boss Hiro arrives 	from 	Korea. Once again thanks for your
great effort with regards "Enron ORG".

	Pls. find the attached file reg "DPC Implementation Agreements" as
per your request.

	 <<1 Invoicing  Payment_rev.doc>>  <<2 Annual Report  Quarterly
Report_rev.doc>>  <<3 Annual Programme  Specific Lifting Schedule_rev.doc>>
 <<4 Shipping Information_rev.doc>>

	Greatly appreciated if you could send me "DPC logo" in electronic
file.

	Kindest regards,
	Yaqoob Al-Zadjali, NGM/22

	-----Original Message-----
From: Y'Barbo, Paul [mailto:Paul.Y'Barbo@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:30 AM
To: yaqoobalzadjali@omanlng.co.om
Cc: Harris, Clay
Subject: RE: DPC Implementation Agreement.

Yaqoob,

Nice to hear from you. I have to admit that I have gotten pulled away by
our other projects during the last month. I should be able to devote
more time to DPC fuel supply this week. My preliminary review leaves me
with the feeling that your document is well thought-out and will be very
useful for DPC implementation procedures. At some point, I would like to
receive an electronic copy, if that would be possible.

I hope that you are well and that we can meet early next month. Did you
have Houston in mind? I will coordinate with Clay Harris.

Regarding, the organization chart: Todd Peterson is no longer with our
company. The rest of the chart looks fine.

We should try to talk Wednesday evening - Muscat time. I will call you
then.

Best Regards,

Paul
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Al Zadjali, Yaqoob OLNG-NGM/22"
> <YaqoobAlZadjali@omanlng.co.om>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Al+20Zadjali+2C+20Yaqoob+20OLNG-NGM_22+22+20+3CY
> aqoobAlZadjali+40omanlng+2Eco+2Eom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, May 15, 2001 2:07 AM
> To:	Y'Barbo, Paul
> Cc:	Sakaguchi, Hiro OLNG-NGM/2; Al Maawali, Said OLNG-NGM/21
> Subject:	DPC Implementation Agreement.
>
>
>
> 	Dear Mr. Paul,
> 	Long time no see no talk, How are you? I hope your are doing
> well.
> Kindly, I would like to remind you to have your valuable comments on
> DPC
> implementation agreements which has been passed and discussed roughly
> during
> your last visit to OLNG. Also, we would like to have a meeting if
> possible by the second week of June,01 at USA . Pls. confirm if the
> time and
> venue suits you or need to be change.
>
> 	Appreciate if you have a look to the attached file with regards
> ENRON organization chart in order to have your comments and any change
> if
> required.
>
> 					 <<Enron Org.doc>>
>
> 	By the way I 've tried to call you today but it was ringing then
> diverted to voice mail system.
>
> 	Wishing you and your company all the best.
>
> 	Have a nice day.
>
> 	Kindest regards,
> 	Yaqoob Al-Zadjali,NGM/22
> 	Asst. Marketing Analyst
> 	Tel:+968-707807-Ext:322
> 	Fax:+968-708221
> 	E-mail:yaqoobalzadjali@omanlng.co.om
>
>
> ***** This email may be confidential,  privileged and/or protected by
> copyright.   If you are not the intended recipient,  you should not
> copy it,
> retransmit it or disclose its contents but should return it to the
> sender
> immediately and delete your copy from your system *****
>
>  - Enron Org.doc << File: Enron Org.doc >>

***** This email may be confidential,  privileged and/or protected by
copyright.   If you are not the intended recipient,  you should not copy it,
retransmit it or disclose its contents but should return it to the sender
immediately and delete your copy from your system *****

 - 1 Invoicing  Payment_rev.doc
 - 2 Annual Report  Quarterly Report_rev.doc
 - 3 Annual Programme  Specific Lifting Schedule_rev.doc
 - 4 Shipping Information_rev.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 04:04 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Enron Security @ ENRON                           12/12/2000 05:11 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Houston
cc:
Subject: Weather Alert

The potential for freezing rain and hazardous road conditions may be present
this evening and early tomorrow morning particularly in the northern and
western parts of the city. Please monitor local news and weather forecasts
and use your judgement to insure a safe commute.

The Enron building will be open for business tomorrow, Wednesday, December
13th. If there should be any change of building status, notice will be given
on the building hotline and accessible by calling 713-750-5142.


Reservation status has changed to CONFIRMED. See attachment.

ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30795
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS
SINK = PNPK
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 06/12/2002
STOP_TIME = 06/12/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 3.13
OFFER_PRICE = 3.13
BID_PRICE = 3.13
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = lisa.gang@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 06/11/2002
RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT =
TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 06/11/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = for info call (503)464-5070.
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0
REASSIGNED_START_TIME =
REASSIGNED_STOP_TIME =


Marcus -

Here is the note I sent on 3/31.  David Mitchell is definitely the right guy.

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
04/08/99 05:54 PM ---------------------------
To: Marcus Von Bock Und Polach/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Electronic Trading Systems

Marcus:

I tried unsuccessfully to reach you by telephone - the number I was give for
you appears to be at some other company entirely.  Please feel free to call
me once you get this note to discuss further.

The OMLX issue related to having the terminal of a non-US futures exchange in
the US.  There is a related but different issue you can discuss with Paul
Simons that came up in connection with the ZUMA 2000 trading system in
London.  On that system, we would have been able to trade financial contracts
electronically.  The problem was that our counterparties were also US
entities and, in some instances, trading from the US.  I believe that the
advice we received from Cadwalader was that if our counterparties were all
outside the US we would have been able to trade on ZUMA 2000.   Of course,
all of this relates to derivatives trading.  If the system you have in mind
will be for the physical commodities, we should include Jeff Hodge in the
discussion.

I have no objection to you contacting David Mitchell directly.  I am copying
Paul on this note since it makes sense to coordinate with him since he has
already dealt with similar issues.

Marcus Von Bock Und Polach
03/30/99 10:18 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Mark, in the course of our effort to establish internet-based click-and trade
business for a number of commodities (mainly gas, power) in the main markets
of Europe (and with respect to pulp&paper also possibly the US), I think, it
is necessary to evaluate the CFTC issues. I understand that Cadwalader has
given some advice earlier this year re. OMLX and think it may be best to
contact them. Who do you think, I should contact (I understand, the person we
earlier dealt with was a David Mitchell) and how do you want to play this
contact. Greetings, Marcus.


I AM LOL - GAS OR TERDS  0 OKAY OKAY - I AM SORRY - I DIDNT KNOW THAT YOU
WOULD CONSIDER TRADING PHYSICAL
THEN YES I THINK YOU SHOULD CALL SCOTT


As we begin to meet with FERC Staff on the Wholesale market issues related to
CA problems, I think that we need to put together a list of questions that
FERC needs to be asking Western power market participants.

The following are some questions that I think are important to have FERC ask;
I'm sure there are more.

1. Were California utilities underscheduling load into the PX day ahead
market?
2. How many MWs did the CA ISO procure during each hour during the Summer
2000?  How does this compare with CA ISO procurement during 1999?
3. Has PG&E changed its bidding behavior associated with its Hydro facilities
in 2000?
3. Are there baseload facilities that were operated differently in 2000 than
in 1999?
4. Were any generation plants off-line due to unplanned maintenance during
Summer 2000?
5. How did the CA ISO demand side program work?  Why didn't more load
participate?
6. What options did SDG&E have to "hedge" its retail rates?  What were prices
in the CAL PX block forward market on Jan 15, 2000 and May 15, 2000?
7. How high did natural gas prices go in California for generation during
Summer 2000?
8. Were other Western power markets prices higher (year-on-year)?
9. Did the CA ISO Board face political pressure to reduce bid caps?  Is this
appropriate for a FERC jurisdictional entity?
10. What specific details is SDG&E referring to in its Complaint on
"unworkably competitive" CA ISO markets?  Can these be fixed "quickly"?

Please add other questions.

Jim


We are pleased to present you with a 2001 Special Stock Option Grant Award.  As a participant in this grant you have the opportunity to share in the ownership of Enron and the potential profit from increases in the value of Enron's common stock.

The 2001 Special Stock Option Grant was made to let you know how valuable you are and to recognize your contributions in making Enron the great company it is today.   Although there are no guarantees as to Enron's future stock performance, we believe that an Enron stock option has tremendous future growth potential.  The value you ultimately receive from your options will depend on the price of Enron stock at the time you exercise your options.

You can access your 2001 Special Stock Option Grant Agreement and the Stock Plan document governing the grant via your eHRonline account on the intranet website at http://ehronline.enron.com.  Unlike stock options granted in the past a copy of your grant agreement will not be mailed to your home address.

Additionally, the following information regarding the 2001 Special Stock Option Grant can be found on the HR website http://hrweb.enron.com.

?	2001 Special Stock Option Grant Highlights
?	2001 Special Stock Option Grant Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
?	A "How to Exercise Options" document that contains contact information and PaineWebber forms applicable to your stock options

Please take time to review this material.  It is important to us and to you.  If you have any questions, please contact your Human Resources representative.


Attached is an Approval Form that will have to be completed to request if we
want to trade with a new counterparty or on a new reference credit. I have
incorporated comments from Origination, Credit and Legal. But should you have
any further comments please let me know ASAP, as I plan to introduce this
form by the middle of next week. (Note that there will be two forms, one for
bankruptcy swaps and one for other credit derivatives.)

Regards

Tomas


Just wondering how many people we will be serving.  Also, are you going to
send directiosn to you house?

Thanks-

Andrea


I talked to Bill Newman (Southern) about this proposal yesterday.  I asked Bill if we were correct in reading the proposal to say that Southern was now open to consider the use of financial rights for transmission rather than physical rights.  He said that was correct.  I asked him if they were also willing to consider an auction as a mechanism to allocate financial rights.  He said they would consider an auction as long as they could have a way to obtain the rights needed to serve native load without driving up the cost of that service.

This is a major change in Southern's position and may open the door for resolving the major differences between the SETrans group and the Grids on congestion management functions, assuming the Grids stay with the approach that came out of the FERC mediation sessions.

I also asked Bill if he was negotiating with Entergy to form an RTO.  He said he could not confirm that officially (but confidentially- they were talking a lot more and we should see something in a couple of weeks.  He also indicated that this was the reason they were now open to the financial rights approach).

Based on the above, I think the Southern transmission pricing proposal was their attempt to gain support of the PSCs, by addressing the PSCs concerns about transmission cost increases, and to open the door to resolving the differences Southern has had with Entergy over financial vs physical transmission rights.

As far as the proposal is concerned, and the study by the Analysis Group/Economics,  there are a lot of issues we could raise with both.  The study is only valid for the specific assumptions they made (rolled in rates for all transmission and long-term sales from Henry Hub to PJM) and Southern's proposal, once again, leaves too much unspecified to know exactly what they intended.

I think we would be best served by taking the position that we welcome the study report pointing out the some of the very issues that need to be addressed in the next phase being proposed by FERC for the development of a Southeast RTO, and we are glad to note that the Analysis Group recognized that many of the issues raised could be resolved by  previous proposals to reform transmission pricing, such as the proposal to auction financial rights that Enron has been advocating.  We are also pleased to note that Southern has also recognized the use of financial rights as a viable alternative to physical transmission rights.

Please let me know if you do not agree with the above approach, and I'll give you a list of issues we could raise with the Southern proposal. But, I think we should wait a couple of weeks and see if Southern and Entergy have something put together we can address.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 9:50 AM
To: Connor, Joe
Cc: Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah
Subject: FW: Southern Company releases reports on nation's transmission system

Joe --

Can you please give me your comments on this report by Southern?  Also, what do you think that Southern intends to gain for itself? I guess that the zonal model would force all generation to site on the boundries of Southern.  This goes against the single rate model for RTOs that FERC appears to desire = continues pancaking.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From:   "Samantha Slater" <SSLATER@epsa.org>@ENRON
Sent:   Friday, November 02, 2001 9:21 AM
To:     bhueter@enron.com; Linnell, Elizabeth; Kingerski, Harry; jmigden@enron.com; jsteffe@enron.com; Robinson, Marchris; Petrochko, Mona L.; Kaufman, Paul; rboston@enron.com; rshapiro@enron.com; snord@enron.com; Montovano, Steve; Landwehr, Susan M.

Subject:        Southern Company releases reports on nation's transmission      system

Southern Company releases reports on nation's transmission system

Thursday, November 01, 2001
Contact: Laura A. Gillig, 404-506-5333 or 1-866-506-5333
media@southerncompany.com

Southern Company today released two reports on critical issues facing the nation's electric transmission system that need increased attention by federal policymakers.

The first report authored by the economics consulting firm Analysis Group/Economics, Inc. presents some of the key problems with traditional regulatory policies that are inhibiting investment in new transmission facilities and distorting location decisions by new generators.

On October 10, 2001, Allen Franklin, Southern Company's chairman, president and CEO, testified before Congress regarding the need to provide better transmission pricing signals to generators so that they will be incented to locate closer to customers and in areas not requiring substantial new transmission investment. The problem presented is critical to Southern Company, as over 30,000 MW of new generation is seeking to locate in Southern Company's service area - an amount far greater than will be needed by area consumers. Most of this generation will be sold outside of the region, and will require major expansion of the transmission system. In most of these cases, it would have cost less and have been more reliable to locate the generation closer to its customers, but because generators don't face the true costs they impose on the transmission system, they are more likely to locate closer to sources of gas to fuel the plants, without regard to the transmission costs imposed.

The study conducted by Analysis Group/Economics finds that it generally would be less expensive to locate generation close to consumers and build gas pipelines when needed than to build generation near the gas fields and transmit the power to consumers located far away. Yet under current Federal regulatory policies, where gas pipeline pricing is distance sensitive and transmission pricing is not, exactly the wrong price signal is being provided to generators. Inconsistent pricing simply does not make sense for two competing energy infrastructures.

Southern Company has proposed a solution to this current inefficient pricing regime, which is described in the second report being released today - a "Southern Company Transmission Pricing Proposal." The proposed solution is a regulated pricing framework that takes into account the major factors that affect the incremental costs of providing transmission service - distance, congestion and losses, more closely aligning electric transmission and gas pipeline pricing policies. Distance

sensitivity is factored into the pricing proposal by using a zonal rate system, where longer distance transactions over multiple zones pay more than shorter transactions within a zone. Congestion is dealt with through the use of locational marginal pricing, and losses are handled through

distance-based loss factors or some other method of measuring marginal losses.

The Southern Company proposal also suggests that generators who create the need for transmission upgrades that do not benefit other customers should pay for those upgrades, in return for which they would receive rights to use the transmission system without paying congestion costs. These transmission rights could be sold to third parties in a secondary market. This form of "participant funding" will ensure that generators face the costs of the location decisions they make, leading to more efficient decisions and eliminating uneconomic and unnecessary transmission investment and thus reducing energy costs for consumers.

The Southern Company proposal also points to the importance of sufficient returns on transmission investments to provide the proper incentives for expansion of the networks. The nature of the transmission business is changing dramatically, and returns have to be re-evaluated as a result. Also emphasized is the importance of incentive or performance-based rates, particularly for regional transmission organizations that are being formed around the country, and the need to eliminate regulatory lag for cost recovery of the substantial investments that will be made in the transmission system over the next decade.

 - SO_FullRep.pdf <<SO_FullRep.pdf>>
 - AGE_FullRep.pdf <<AGE_FullRep.pdf>>


AUGIE E-NEWS
October 25, 2000
Volume 1, Number 4
**************************
Augie E-News is a bi-monthly (or as needed) newsletter sent to alumni of
Augustana College informing them of the latest news from campus.
**************************

***Viking Days 2000 - Thanks for Coming Home!:
October 6-8 was quite the weekend for Augustana.  It began with the
inauguration of Dr. Bruce Halverson '66 as Augustana's 22nd
President.  Cold weather didn't keep alumni away from the parade. And the
football game against NDSU was a good fight.  We inducted the Class of
1950 into the Honor Guard at the Heritage Honor Luncheon and honored
outstanding individuals at the Athletic Hall of Fame Banquet on Friday
night and at the Alumni Banquet on Saturday night.  Viking Varieties was a
hit in the Sioux Falls Arena and the crowd was great at the Afterglow,
complete with music by President Halverson and the Fabulous Jadesmen and
Doc Krueger and the Alumni Brass Choir.  Click on
http://www.augie.edu/alumni/homecoming.html for pictures from the
weekend.  Class pictures can be found at the "Reunions Site" under each
class year. Plan now to attend Viking Days 2001, October 5-7.  The Classes
of 1936, 1941, 1946, 1951, 1956, 1961, 1966, 1971, 1976, 1981, 1986, 1991,
and 1996 will celebrate reunions.

***Joel Wudel '78 resigns as Director of Alumni Relations, Paul Krueger
'97 is Promoted:***
Effective October 15, 2000 Joel Wudel, is no longer at Augustana.  He
is moving on to other endeavors in Kansas City, MO.  Well-wishes can be
sent to his home at 4908 S Quail Run Ave, Sioux Falls, SD 57108.

Paul Krueger, who has been Associate Director of Alumni Relations the
last three years, has assumed Joel's position.  Paul graduated from
Augustana in 1997 with majors in journalism and communications.  He was
student body president his senior year and involved in many other campus
activities.  Paul's wife, Joni, works in the Admission Office at
Augie.  Paul can be reached at (605) 274-5530 or at krueger@wise.augie.edu

***Augustana and WYNCOM, Inc. present The Fifth Annual Worldwide Lessons
in Leadership Series:***
The world's largest training conference focuses on rapid change and
strategies for success.  Entitled   "The Brave New Workplace: Strategies
to Excel in a World of Change," the program will be available throughout
the world via satellite on November 15, 2000.

Augustana joins FORTUNE Magazine as the exclusive local hosts for
this program.  This extraordinary program features personal insights from
Nobel Peace Prize winner Nelson Mandela.  It continues with the latest
strategies from Dr. Stephen Covey, Dr. Tom Peters, Dr. Ken Blanchard,
Dr. Martha Rogers, and Don Tapscott.   There will also be an executive
panel featuring Martha Stewart, Intel founder Andy Grove, and
Yahoo! founder Jerry Yang.

The program begins at 9:45 a.m. in Sioux Falls and will be held at
the Sioux Falls Convention Center.  For time and location details for
Augie alums in other parts of the country, for more information, or to
register, please visit the online program information at www.wyn.com or
call 1-800-689-9771.

***Christmas Vespers Tickets Available:
Tickets are available for Christmas Vespers, which will be December
1-3.  They are $10 per person and can be purchased with a credit card by
calling the Augustana Box Office at (605) 274-4613.  You can also stop by
the Box Office during regular business hours.  Performances are Friday,
December 1 at 7:30 p.m. at First Lutheran Church, Saturday, December 2 at
4:30 and 7:30 p.m. at First Lutheran Church, and Sunday, December 3 at
2:30 and 7:30 p.m. at Saint Joseph Cathedral.

***Augie Volleyball Team Continues Winning Streak:
The Augie Volleyball team continues to be ranked #2 in the national
Div. II rankings.  The team is 23-1 overall and 12-1 in the North Central
Conference.  The team travels to Brookings on October 31 to battle 8th
ranked SDSU.  Recently, the Vikings swept Saint Cloud State and Minnesota
State, Mankato.  The team has set a record for consecutive wins with
38.  The previous record of 16 was set a year ago.  Follow volleyball and
all Augie athletics on the web at www.augie.edu/athletics

**E-mail the Augustana Alumni Office at: alumni@inst.augie.edu Our phone
number is (605) 274-4904.**


Nothing for me.

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/30/2001 09:09 AM

		 To: Anne C Koehler@ECT, Brent Hendry@Enron, Carol St Clair@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson@Enron, Esmeralda Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kaye Ellis@ECT, Mark
Greenberg@ENRON, Mark Taylor@ECT, Mary Cook@ECT, Robert Bruce@Enron, Samantha
Boyd@Enron, Sara Shackleton@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/Enron@EnronXGate, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Bailey@ECT, Taffy Milligan@ECT, Tana Jones@ECT,
Theresa Zucha/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reminder

Timesheets are due tomorrow... May 31.  Please send me your exceptions for
May 16-31.

Thanks!

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


This request has been pending your approval for  37 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000057285&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000057285
Request Create Date : 8/30/01 5:59:30 PM
Requested For       : erik.simpson@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Basic Energy
Resource Type       : Applications


---------------------- Forwarded by Clint Freeland/Corp/Enron on 09/28/2000
12:25 PM ---------------------------

"Rosica, Paul" <prosica@lehman.com> on 09/28/2000 12:22:00 PM
To: "'Clint.Freeland@enron.com'" <Clint.Freeland@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Registration Statement Language

Clint - We are generally ok with the language you sent over earlier today.
However, we would like to make a couple of modifications.  I have attached a
marked up copy of the document for your review.  Let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Paul

 <<Reg statement language.doc>>

> Paul S. Rosica
> Lehman Brothers
> 212-526-8887 Phone
> 212-526-2755 Fax
> prosica@lehman.com
>
> This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review,
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and
> should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an
> offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any
> transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers Inc., its
> subsidiaries or affiliates.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
> secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this
> information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as
> such.  All information is subject to change without notice.
>
>
>
>
>

 - Reg statement language.doc


Yes, this deal should go to AEP with the HPL transaction.  The reason there are no forward volumes booked is because they have a monthly election to nominate baseload gas daily priced gas or wait and nominate daily volumes priced at gas daily.  At any rate there is no way to know in forward months what they are going to take subject to contractual maximums.  If you have any further questions let me know.

Thanks,

Tom


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000 10:56 AM -----

	Jeff Blumenthal
	06/18/2000 04:16 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Assignment of ISDAs

Sara,

For your information.  Best regards.  Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT on 06/18/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------
From: Peggy Banczak on 06/16/2000 07:26 PM
To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Assignment of ISDAs

Jeff:  In case you are not aware, there is another attorney that assists
Jaime with his trading business.  Her name is Sara Shackleton and I am sure
she would appreciate being informed of tax matters related to the Mexico
Group's trading activities.

	Jeff Blumenthal
	06/12/2000 03:44 PM

		 To: Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Susan Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Assignment of ISDAs

Jaime,

In connection with our telephone conversation with Susan Helton last Friday,
I wanted to follow up with you regarding the possibility of Enron North
America Corp. ("ENA") assigning some or all of its ISDA agreements entered
into with Mexican counterparties to an Enron entity formed under the laws of
Mexico ("Enron Mexico").  Such a transfer would cause ENA to be subject to
U.S. federal income tax (at a 35 percent rate) on the value of the contracts
assigned.

As we discussed, one alternative may be for Enron Mexico to enter into new
ISDA agreements with the Mexican counterparties, and to allow the ISDA
agreements entered into by Mexican counterparties with ENA to lapse or,
alternatively, to cancel such agreements.  While such an alternative may be
preferable from a U.S. tax perspective, other business concerns must also be
considered (such as credit issues).

Please contact me at ext. 35777 if you'd like to discuss further.

Best regards,

Jeff


Bill -

I will need to know today if you have anyone that you would like to put through this pilot.

There are 3 modules and for now, there is no cost!

Amy


-----Original Message-----
From: 	DDidio@nyiso.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:58 AM
To:	Cook, Mary
Subject:	Virtual Bidding - data release

Dan DiDio
Customer Relations
518-356-6097
----- Forwarded by Daniel Didio/NYISO on 10/09/2001 10:53 AM -----

                    market_relations@nyiso.com
                    Sent by:                               To:     market_relations@nyiso.com
                    owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.       cc:
                    thebiz.net                             Subject:     Virtual Bidding - data release

                    09/27/2001 05:18 PM
                    Please respond to
                    market_relations

Dear Market Participants:

Methodology used in developing the NYISO Virtual Bidding Credit
Requirements:

Day Ahead Market Hourly Zonal LBMP and Real Time Market Integrated Hourly
Zonal LBMP values were used as the data source for developing the NYISO
Virtual Bidding Credit Requirements.  These values are available on the
NYISO web site.  The time period of June 1, 2001 through August 31, 2001
was used.  Peak hours are defined here as the hours of 6am (06:00) through
and including 10pm (22:00).  The absolute value of the difference of the
DAM and R/T price was calculated for each peak hour.  The 97th percentile
of these series of prices was calculated for each zone.  The maximum of
these zonal 97th percentiles was calculated to be $159.33.  The data
manipulation and calculation was performed in MS Excel. The attached
spreadsheet contains the data used in the June 2001 to August 2001
calculations.

(See attached file: Virt Bidding Credit Req data.xls)

Please contact the Customer Relations department with any questions.

Regards,
Customer Relations
518-356-6060(See attached file: Virt Bidding Credit Req data.xls)

 - Virt Bidding Credit Req data.xls


Here are some more
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/2000 02:45 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 02:25 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: NIMO JAN 2000

FINAL

Hi Morgan,

Please schedule the following (in DTH's) off of CNG to Niagra Mohawk:

Pooled  East Meter 20550 821/day
  West Meter 20500    421/ day

Balanced East Meter 20550 381/day
(firm)  West Meter 20500 430/day

Thanks!


FYI.  I hope to have a conversation with GE today regarding finishing this
document, including the exhibits.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000 08:58
AM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/22/2000 02:42:23 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: City of Austin Agreement

Attached please find a clean copy of the City of Austin Facility
Agreement, as well as a blackline showing changes to the document agreed
to by GE.  To complete the agreement the following needs to be inserted:

1. For the recitals, the kW capacity of its plant and  the location
of the plant.

2. All exhibits, including Exhibit N-3 (which is the original price
for each unit) and Exhibit U, which contains the Site specific material.
The Table of Contents should then be run to include all of the exhibits.

3. The agreement reference in 6.7.1

4. The payee and address for invoices in 6.7.2

5. The names, addresses, etc. for Sections 25.1 and 25.3
 <<Comparison of the Gas Turbine Agreement.DOC>>  <<Gas Turbine
Agreement Draft of 11/22/00.DOC>>
 - Comparison of the Gas Turbine Agreement.DOC
 - 00.DOC


Attached is the October 17th South American DPR.

Attached is theDaily P/L Summary of   $      8,000

South America Trading	              $      8,000

Argentina Power Total:	              $      3,000

	Power Trading
		Rho & Drift	              $            0
		Price Actuals		  $     5,000
		June PMA (Epec)	  $     6,000
					 ------------------
				              $    11,000

	Modesto Maranzana Plant
		Rho & Drift		 ($     1,000)
		Price Actuals		 ($     8,000)
				             -------------------
				             ($     9,000)

Brazil Power Total:		 $       7,000

		Rho & Drift		 $       7,000
		          			-------------------
		Total			 $       7,000

Argentina Gas Total:   	             ($      2,000)

		Intramonth Book:
		    Vol Updates               ($      2,000)
					-------------------
		Total			 ($      2,000)

Modesto Maranzana Plant:	  $            0

Regards,

Patricia Rivera


FYI.  My understanding is we are not going to be active in the proceeding.
PHC is on 11/17.  We may just want to list as an interested party so we
know what is going on in the case.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000
11:19 AM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 11/07/2000 08:06:04 PM

To:   <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <MNelson@electric.com>,
      <RSchlanert@electric.com>, <mpetroch@enron.com>,
      <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <bchen@newenergy.com>,
      <kmagruder@newpower.com>, <peter_bray@newpower.com>,
      <Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>, <AWeller@sel.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>,
      <ben.reyes@utility.com>
cc:

Subject:  BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Attached is an ALJ ruling issued today in connection with the OII into
interruptible programs.

Dan
(See attached file: CPUC01-#83220-v1-R0010002_Lynch_Ruling_.doc)

 - CPUC01-#83220-v1-R0010002_Lynch_Ruling_.doc


I have a new pager, and although I'm not positive I will keep it long term,
here's the info:

To call by phone and enter a page:  888 710 7935
To send an email message: 8887107935@pagenetmessage.net

I'm still trying to figure it out....


Took a call from Bill Cronin at New Power  today. He requested that they be able to deal with commercial customers that were off limits before, ie medium commercial or large commercial. He also mentioned that they may have an interesty in some of the people. Any thoughts?

 Rick


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/08/2001 10:13 AM -----

	Susan J Mara
	02/08/2001 12:47 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: RE: LA Times story

Good story on retail -- as a direct result of ARM's hiring of Edelman.  Some
good Lay and Robert Michaels' quotes.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001 10:42 PM -----

	"Counihan, Rick" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>
	02/07/2001 01:09 PM

		 To: "'Allen, Stevan'" <stevan.allen@edelman.com>, "Counihan, Rick"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)"
<athomas@newenergy.com>, "'ARM List Serve'" <Arm@phaser.com>
		 cc: "Warner, Jami" <jami.warner@edelman.com>, "Beiser, Megan"
<Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
		 Subject: RE: LA Times story

This story is fantastic!!  It is the best single piece I have seen on the
retail market in California and it is in the newspaper of record.  I think
we should make copies and hand them out in our press packets and all
meetings we have.  I think this is a concrete example of a payoff from
working with Edelman.

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Stevan [mailto:stevan.allen@edelman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 9:31 AM
To: 'Rick. Counihan (E-mail); Aaron Thomas (E-mail)
Cc: Warner, Jami; Beiser, Megan; Fairchild, Tracy
Subject: LA Times story

http://www.latimes.com/business/reports/power/lat_retail010207.htm

This piece ran front page of this morning's LA Times. It refers to provision
of AB1X we are concerned about. Also, Enron gets a lot of attention. I will
have this forwarded to the entire team later this morning. Thanks.

Stevan

PS - Bryson is having a news conference this morning in Sac. Will keep you
posted.

Deregulation Didn't Foster Competition

By NICHOLAS RICCARDI and STEVE BERRY, Times Staff Writers

The way people scrambled for a stake in California's power market three
years ago, you'd have thought it was the second coming of the Gold Rush.
Politicians and free marketers boasted that they were freeing millions of
customers from their monopolistic utilities so they could shop for cheaper
electricity. The state ordered an $87-million publicity campaign, promising
a brave new energy world bustling with competition.
But those dreams of capitalism unleashed never materialized, dashed by
provisions in the 1996 deregulation law that effectively undermined
competition and gave the utilities a substantial edge over newcomers. In the
end, only 1.7% of the utilities' residential users switched to other
providers, many opting to pay more for "green" energy.
Although the chaos swirling around California's electricity crisis has
chiefly focused on soaring wholesale prices, the virtual absence of
competition at the consumer level has played a key role in deregulation's
undoing.
Had competition among retailers flourished, garnering the millions of
customers deregulators expected, prices might never have reached today's
unprecedented peaks and the turmoil might have been tempered, economists and
retailers say.
Retail competition "would not have prevented a crisis, but it would have
toned it down," said Richard Counihan, spokesman for Green Mountain Energy,
which has returned most of its 50,000 customers to the utilities' ranks.
Now even the prospect of competition is gone. A measure enacted by the
Legislature last week, which made state government the biggest electricity
buyer in California, suspended further retail competition, preventing anyone
from underbidding the state.
"That buries us," said Tony Wayne, president of UtiliSource of Brea, which,
under the new law, can keep its relatively small number of customers but is
barred from entering into new contracts.
Few thought it would come to this.

High Hopes Collide With Reality
Almost 300 firms registered with the state to sell electricity to consumers.
Many of them, quick-buck hucksters or small-time operations, were scared off
by background checks, fingerprinting and the $25,000 deposit required to
enter the market.
But then there were the likes of giant Enron Corp., which predicted that the
new market would pull 700,000 customers from the utilities in the first few
weeks. Another firm deployed 400 salespeople, nabbing residential and
business prospects by the thousands.
They quickly discovered that the structure of California's landmark
deregulation effort erected protective barriers preventing most retailers
from beating the prices of the big three utilities--Southern California
Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas & Electric.
For example, deregulation law allowed the utilities to keep their 9 million
customers until each took the initiative to switch. Any ratepayer who used a
moderate amount of energy and wanted to change companies had to pay $600 for
a new meter--unless the retailer wanted to eat the cost itself.
In contrast, Pennsylvania, where deregulation has been more successful than
in California, requires most of its utilities to surrender some of their
customers. Last year, 300,000 customers of one utility were auctioned off to
the retailer who could promise them the most savings. All together, close to
1 million customers have switched from utilities to retailers, with savings
estimates ranging from a few dollars to $15 per month.
In California, the next barrier was expressly designed by deregulation
architects to keep new retailers at bay, at least temporarily.
Before throwing utilities into a free-for-all, lawmakers felt obligated to
give them time to pay off debts that would hurt their ability to offer
competitive prices. The Legislature froze customer prices at 1996 levels,
well above what the utilities were then paying for electricity. The
difference would be used to pay their debts.
The hitch for prospective retailers was that their customers--like those
remaining with utilities--would be charged the extra amount too. That
seriously hurt the retailers' ability to shave prices for their customers
without taking a hit themselves.
Utility executives say the so-called competition transition charge
accomplished its intent: providing some protection against new players until
the utilities could shed their debt and compete on an even field.
According to those executives, the plan went awry when wholesale electricity
prices soared before the special debt charge was lifted and competition had
a chance to flourish.
"We haven't had enough time for this market to work," said Denise Grant,
director of the Edison division that works with retailers. She said Edison
expected to lose 150,000 customers annually--a far cry from what has
happened.
Retailers say they faced other obstacles that seemed designed to help the
utilities keep as many of their customers as possible.
One of the biggest was a newly created energy marketplace called the Power
Exchange.
Under the exchange's rules, all buyers--little guys with a few hundred
customers and mammoth utilities with millions--paid the same price for
electricity. Once again, retailers were stymied in their search for ways to
cut their customers' bills.
Retailers had no place else to shop for energy because suppliers could make
more money selling in high volume to billion-dollar utilities on the Power
Exchange, rather than cutting small deals with upstart companies.
Wayne, the president of UtiliSource, learned the hard way. He was peddling
electricity in California in early 1997, before the state created the Power
Exchange. After arranging a good, but informal, deal with a Washington
generator, he sent out hundreds of salespeople, took to the road himself and
soon cornered 10,000 customers.
But the birth of the exchange caused the death of his deal, Wayne said. The
generators pulled out when they realized how much money they could make
selling on the open market.
"That was an oh-my-god. They said, 'Why should we give you a discount when
we can sell it to the Power Exchange ourselves?' " he said.
Retailers say the state protects the utilities in subtler but no less
damaging ways. That includes billing customers who switch companies for
certain overhead costs of their old utilities, such as weather forecasters
and accountants involved in procuring electricity.
In late 1999, a coalition of retailers filed a complaint with the Public
Utilities Commission arguing that their customers should not be forced to
pay costs for utilities they had decided to leave.
Earlier this month, the PUC finally reached a decision that favors the
retailers' argument but accepts the utilities' calculations of the expenses
borne by retailers, an amount critics say is far too low.
In dissenting, Commissioner Richard A. Bilas called the decision's paltry
award to retailers another strike against them.
"We cannot keep stymieing retail competition if we are seeking rational
markets," he said. "Energy service providers [retailers] have left the state
in droves. . . . They need all the encouragement we can give them."

Retailers Found Little Opportunity
Be they multinational giants or kitchen-table entrepreneurs, retailers are
dismayed by their experiences with deregulation.
Enron spent $5 million trying to sell electricity in 1997 and the spring of
1998. But, unable to offer enticing discounts, the firm picked up only
30,000 customers.
In a recent meeting with reporters and editors at The Times, Enron Chief
Executive Kenneth Lay suggested that the framers of deregulation kept market
forces pinned down in the retail sector. As a result, there was little money
to be made and little incentive to stick around.
"The more customers you signed up," Lay said, "the more [money] you lost."
Last week, Enron returned a number of its remaining electricity contracts to
PG&E. "In the end," Lay said, "we couldn't change the rules and we pulled
out."
On the other end of the spectrum, Paul Oshideri is now a one-man operation
since he laid off his seven employees during his unprofitable two years
trying to entice customers to Cucamonga Energy.
"You don't have that many options," said Oshideri, who is still holding on
to his 250 customers and vows not to quit. "What can you do? You can't do
anything right now."
Only when it came to businesses and big institutions such as universities
were retailers able to make a dent in the market. The small price reductions
they offered translated into huge savings for those large users of
electricity. The retailers also offered a variety of other services,
including aid to help businesses become more energy efficient.
Although fewer than 2% of all residential customers have switched to new
energy companies, 13% of industrial users have done so, according to the
Public Utilities Commission.
"If they'd structured this differently they would have had households able
to make big savings just like industrials," said Cal State Fullerton
economist Robert Michaels.
There is some dispute among deregulation critics over whether legislators
designed the law to protect the utilities from an onslaught of competition,
or it just turned out that way.
Jesse Knight, a former member of the Public Utilities Commission who
dissented on the panel's deregulation plan, said the law is biased against
retail competition.
"But I don't think it was the legislation's intent to protect the monopoly,"
Knight said.
There is general agreement, however, that not enough attention was paid to
the mechanics of the retail market.
Much of the deregulation legislation deals with generation, transmission and
wholesale prices of electricity. The only provisions on the retail end
simply allow consumers to shop for deals.
Lay, the Enron executive, recalled that the utilities fought hard to
maintain their customer base. The irony is that, with wholesale prices
skyrocketing over the last six months, buying electricity for all those
customers has driven the utilities to the brink of insolvency.
"With 20-20 hindsight, I expect they wish they'd agreed to more choice at
the customer level," Lay said. "Then maybe they wouldn't be in the
circumstances they're in."
   News </news> Politics </news/politics> Entertainment
<http://www.calendarlive.com> music <http://www.calendarlive.com/music>,
movies <http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/>, art
<http://www.calendarlive.com/art/>, TV <http://www.calendarlive.com/tvent/>,
restaurants
<http://www.calendarlive.com/top/1,1419,L-LATimes-Restaurants-X!Front,00.htm
l>    <<...OLE_Obj...>>    Business </business> Travel </travel>
Classifieds </class> jobs </class/employ>, homes </class/realestate>, cars
<http://www.cars.com/carsapp/latimes/?srv=parser&act=display&tf=/index-defau
lt.tmpl>, rentals </class/rentals>    <<...OLE_Obj...>>    Sports
<http://sports.latimes.com> Commentary </news/comment/> Shopping
<http://www.latimes.com/class/2shop/menus/>     <<...OLE_Obj...>>
 <<...OLE_Obj...>>
Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times

STEVAN ALLEN
Vice President
Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
1215 K Street - Suite 970
Sacramento, CA 95814

916/442-2331 - phone
916/447-8509 - fax
stevan.allen@edelman.com
 <<Allen, Stevan.vcf>>


Carol, enclosed please find proposed revisions to ISDA Schedule Part 6 -- the
revisions would incorporate the 2000 Supplement to the 1993 Commodity
Derivatives Definitions.  I have also enclosed a brief memo from me to Sara
discussing the revisions.

The revisions do not seek to substantively change Part 6 (e.g., we are not
seeking to change the "Disruption Fallbacks" or their priorities).  The
revisions simply acknowledge the 2000 Supplement and make the terminology
consistent.

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


please review file and format for nomal layout vs landscape.
thanks, m


Entire story:
http://chicagosports.com/bears/content/story/0,1984,168218,00.html

Clipped from the John Mullin article:

The Bears are preparing to play one of the NFL's poorest defenses against
the run but may face that defense without their No. 1 running back.

Rookie tailback Anthony Thomas is questionable with a strained hamstring
that has bothered him for the last couple of weeks, got a little worse in
the win over Tampa Bay and could eventually cause coaches to hold him out of
a game to let it heal.

Thomas did not practice Wednesday and his status for Sunday night's game at
Minnesota will not be determined until closer to game time.

"I can't say when I really did it," Thomas said. "It just bothered me a
little more at the end and halftime when you rest on it awhile."

Injuries are part of every week's preparations and players become accustomed
to playing with pain and injury. But with a playoff berth possible, the
Bears may bench Thomas to let the hamstring get closer to full strength.

"We could get there," said coach Dick Jauron. "You definitely don't want to
do that, but any player that's out there that has an injury that causes them
to not only be not as effective as they can be but also risks further
injury, you don't want to expose him to that. We'll just have to monitor
that really closely."

[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [  OUR VIEW  ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]

Just passing along.   Realize the Bears are thinking now much further past
just this game.   Dick Jauron knows Anthony Thomas will be a big part of
their playoff success and he may be thinking conservatively here.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


The files for the broker quotes have been moved from the Netco file to O:\erms\1intra\broker quotes.  Those will be used for the estate.

Please let anyone else who used those files know to start saving them to the new files starting today.

Thanks

Kam


What I emailed to PG&E and their response.  Barry will have to respond to
their questions.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2001 09:34 AM -----

	"Meier, Peter" <peter.meier@neg.pge.com>
	04/13/2001 01:33 AM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>,
Steve.Van.Hooser@enron.com, "Meier, Peter" <peter.meier@neg.pge.com>,
"'svanhooser@houston.rr.com'" <svanhooser@houston.rr.com>
		 cc: Barry.Tycholiz@enron.com, "'wbradfo@enron.com'" <wbradfo@enron.com>,
"'lisa.mellencamp@enron.com'" <lisa.mellencamp@enron.com>, "Barron, Bob"
<bob.barron@neg.pge.com>, "Sarti, Daniel" <daniel.sarti@neg.pge.com>, "Jones,
Susan" <susan.jones@neg.pge.com>
		 Subject: RE: Spread Value Calc.

We will review this in the morning.  In the meantime, it would be extremely
helpful to know what the practical effect of your calculation would be.  In
other words, using this method, what is the valuation of each of the
packages as of today?  Please e-mail your calculation to each of us on the
PG&E team.  Thanks, Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 6:44 PM
To: Steve.Van.Hooser@enron.com; Peter.meier@neg.pge.com
Cc: Barry.Tycholiz@enron.com
Subject: Spread Value Calc.

Attached is a draft of the mark to market language per your discussion with
Barry.  Please review and contact Barry directly to discuss.

Barry's numbers
(713) 667-9956 Home
(713) 302-6442 Cell

(See attached file: PGESpreadvaluationdefinition.doc)

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


It's just that I can't begin to imagine a better or more noble spokesman,
especially portrayed in the light of a martyr, than you.  Will you wear the
shirt?  I think the camera loves it.

Mark


Dear OnePass Elite Member,

Continental Airlines is pleased to advise you that you have been upgraded
to First Class on your upcoming flight due to your OnePass Elite
Membership.

  Confirmation:    VHYLT4
  Flight Number:   63
  Date:            September 19, 2001
  Origination:     EWR
  Destination:     IAH
  Seat:            04A*

This e-mail notice does not replace the need to check-in for the flight.
Recommended check-in time is 1 hour prior to departure for domestic
flights.  If you do not check in at least 20 minutes prior to departure
your seat can be given away.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS E-MAIL.  UNFORTUNATELY E-MAIL SENT TO THIS
ADDRESS CANNOT BE ANSWERED.  PLEASE DIRECT ALL INQUIRIES TO THE ELITE
PRIORITY LINE, WHICH CAN BE FOUND ON YOUR ELITE CARD.

To make changes to your e-mail address, access the Your Account area of
the OnePass site (http://www.onepass.com/asp/youraccount.asp) or contact
the OnePass Service Center as (713) 952-1630.

For changes to your itinerary, contact your Travel Agent or Continental
Reservations at 1-800-525-0280 (Domestic) or 1-800-231-0856
(International).

To unsubscribe from OnePass Elite upgrade e-mail notification, please
visit http://onepass.continental.com/emailupgrades

Thank you for choosing Continental Airlines.


Here it is.  In all it's glory.


How's the weather?


Ladies:
I just wanted to thank you again for your thoughtfulness, support  and hard
work in making today such a special event for me and Charles Eugene!  As I
said at the shower, I'm lucky to have people like you as friends and
co-workers and each of you throughout the last year has helped me get through
this pregnancy and the events leading up to it, for which I am extremely
grateful.  I am truly overwhelmed by everyone's generosity and look forward
to finally putting all of my gifts to good use in the upcoming weeks.
Carol


In hindsight we should have had them pay it.  Oh well.

Got your fax and will check in to others.

-----Original Message-----
From: Keffer, John [mailto:JKeffer@KSLAW.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: question on an invoice

These are the costs and fees charged to us by CT to effect the name change
of the LLC, which you will recall NorthWestern needed done on the closing
date.  Thanks for getting it into the queue.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:57 PM
To: jkeffer@kslaw.com
Subject: question on an invoice

John,

There is a $739 charge from CT Corp. on invoice #186444 (re Blue Dog).
Can you send me an email with a brief explanation?  I want to get this
in the queue.

Ciao,

Kay

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.


I am OK with their comments.  Who is the correct "Counterparty" for this guaranty?

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Rudwell
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:37 PM
To: Nemec, Gerald
Cc: Schockling, Gregory; Blanchard, Georgia
Subject: FW: Bridgline Holdings Guaranty in favor of Sequent

Gerald!

Attached is Sequents/AGL Resources comments to our guaranty form.  Kindly review and if ok with you, please prepare for execution a guaranty in the amount of $6.00MM.

Thanks
Rudwell
53596.

-----Original Message-----
From: Spencer Voytek [mailto:svoytek@aglresources.com]
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2001 8:49 AM
To: Johnson, Rudwell
Cc: Forrest Alexander
Subject: Bridgline Holdings Guaranty in favor of Sequent

Rudwell,
Please see additions to your attached guaranty by my attorney.  If guaranty is acceptable by your attorney; please execute an orginal and forward and fax to my attention.

Any update on our guaranty in Bridgeline's favor?  Let me know.
Thanks.

Spencer R. Voytek
Sequent Energy Management, L.P.
1000 Louisiana, Suite: 1975
Houston, TX 77002
Tel: 832-397-1739
Fax: 832-397-1709


Open Enrollment for your 2002 Health Benefits begins Monday, October 29, 2001!

Q. 	WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
A. 	If you plan to make changes to your existing benefit coverage, you will need to make changes during Open Enrollment which begins 	Monday, October 29, 2001 at 8:00 AM (Central) and ends on November 12, 2001 at 5:00 PM (Central)

	To facilitate these changes, you received an Open Enrollment Benefit Packet at your home address.  This packet contains a personalized 	worksheet and the Enron Instruction Guide to help you make your selections.
	(If you have not received your Info Packet, please let us know ASAP! )

Q.	WHAT DO I NEED TO DO?
	1.  If you are satisfied with your current elections and do not need to make changes, do nothing.  Your current choices will automatically roll 	over to 2002.

	2.  If you plan to make changes to your coverage, you will need to either access the Intranet website at work:  benefits.enron.com
	or at home at  www.Enron.BenefitsNow.com   or call the Phone Enrollment Line at (800) 332-7979, Option 5.

Q. 	I HAVE MORE QUESTIONS.  I NEED MORE INFORMATION.
A.	If you have more questions or need more information, you may attend our Open Enrollment "Brown Bag" Info Session being held on Friday, 	October 26 @ 11:30 PM in the Mt Hood Conference Room.

See you then!

EWS Portland HR Office
Julie Kearney x7404
Grace Rodriguez x8321


Looks good.

Errol


Please remove my name from your list.   Todd Maddock

-----Original Message-----
From: RTO West Regional Representatives Group
[mailto:RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG]On Behalf Of Dalia, Keith A - TOS-DITT1
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:40 PM
To: RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG
Subject:

You have been added to the RRGA-L mailing list (RTO West Congestion Model
Content Group) by Keith Dalia <kadalia@BPA.GOV>.

Please save this message for future  reference, especially if this is the
first time you subscribe to an  electronic mailing list. If you ever need
to  leave the  list,  you  will find  the  necessary instructions  below.
Perhaps  more importantly,  saving a  copy of  this message  (and of  all
future subscription notices  from other mailing lists) in  a special mail
folder will give you instant access to the list of mailing lists that you
are subscribed  to. This may  prove very useful the  next time you  go on
vacation and  need to leave  the lists temporarily so  as not to  fill up
your  mailbox while  you  are away!  You should  also  save the  "welcome
messages" from the  list owners that you will  occasionally receive after
subscribing to a new list.

To send  a message to  all the people  currently subscribed to  the list,
just send mail  to RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. This is  called "sending mail
to the  list", because  you send  mail to a  single address  and LISTSERV
makes  copies  for all  the  people  who  have subscribed.  This  address
(RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG)  is also  called the  "list address".  You must
never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed
to all the people  who have subscribed. All commands must  be sent to the
"LISTSERV  address",   LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.  It   is  very
important to understand  the difference between the  two, but fortunately
it is  not complicated. The  LISTSERV address is  like a FAX  number that
connects you  to a  machine, whereas  the list address  is like  a normal
voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the
FAX number  when you  wanted to talk  to someone on  the phone,  you will
quickly realize  that you used the  wrong number and call  again. No harm
will have been done. If on the  other hand you accidentally make your FAX
call  someone's  voice  line,  the  person receiving  the  call  will  be
inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The
fact that  most people  will eventually  connect the  FAX machine  to the
voice line to  allow the FAX to  go through and make the  calls stop does
not mean  that you  should continue  to send FAXes  to the  voice number.
People would just get mad at you.  It works pretty much the same way with
mailing  lists, with  the difference  that  you are  calling hundreds  or
thousands of people  at the same time, and consequently  you can expect a
lot of people to get upset if  you consistently send commands to the list
address.

You may leave the list at any  time by sending a "SIGNOFF RRGA-L" command
to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You can also tell LISTSERV how you
want it to confirm  the receipt of messages you send to  the list. If you
do not trust  the system, send a "SET RRGA-L  REPRO" command and LISTSERV
will send you a  copy of your own messages, so that you  can see that the
message was distributed and did not get damaged on the way. After a while
you  may find  that this  is getting  annoying, especially  if your  mail
program does not  tell you that the  message is from you  when it informs
you that new mail has arrived from  RRGA-L. If you send a "SET RRGA-L ACK
NOREPRO" command, LISTSERV will mail you a short acknowledgement instead,
which  will look  different in  your  mailbox directory.  With most  mail
programs you  will know immediately  that this is an  acknowledgement you
can read  later. Finally,  you can  turn off  acknowledgements completely
with "SET RRGA-L NOACK NOREPRO".

Following  instructions from  the list  owner, your  subscription options
have been set to "NOFILES REPRO" rather than the usual LISTSERV defaults.
For more  information about subscription  options, send a  "QUERY RRGA-L"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.

Contributions sent to this list are automatically archived. You can get a
list of the available archive files  by sending an "INDEX RRGA-L" command
to  LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You  can then  order these  files
with a "GET RRGA-L LOGxxxx"  command, or using LISTSERV's database search
facilities. Send an  "INFO DATABASE" command for more  information on the
latter.

This  list is  available  in digest  form.  If you  wish  to receive  the
digested version of the postings, just issue a SET RRGA-L DIGEST command.

Please note that  it is presently possible for other  people to determine
that  you are  signed up  to the  list through  the use  of the  "REVIEW"
command,  which  returns   the  e-mail  address  and  name   of  all  the
subscribers. If  you do not  want your name to  be visible, just  issue a
"SET RRGA-L CONCEAL" command.

More  information on  LISTSERV  commands  can be  found  in the  LISTSERV
reference  card, which  you can  retrieve  by sending  an "INFO  REFCARD"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.


Here is the wh data.  I have included the file for February only.  Keep in
mind that some deals, such as Costilla, have multiple tickets in the system
so it is impossible to estimate accrual revenue/expense in the system
accurately.  I have made top level adjustments to these deals.


I was referencing your question about power and gas activity obligations when
I raised the issue of putting it in the exhibits (which we have done pursuant
to discussions we had last Friday)  My point on the fuel plan  was that
Reagan deleted it, which was fine with me.  There is language in the contract
addressing Enron's responsibility to buy gas and fuel oil for the facilities.

Kay

From: David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 07:59 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA question

Kay -- The fuel activity is so limited in scope that a separate Exhibit is
questionable.  If you don't want fuel in the contract body, then why not make
it a subset of the marketing plan.  Fuel activity is directly linked to power
marketing when running their units. Thanks -- david

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 7:20 PM
To: Fairley, David
Subject: Re: MDEA question

Hi David,

Reagan struck all the references to the Fuel Plan.

I think the specific obligations would fit nicely in the scope exhibits, but
we can put the stuff in the body of the contract if that's better for you.
It just seemed that it would easier to work  with in the exhibits.

Kay

From: David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 04:57 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MDEA question

Kay -- Do you want detail about our specific power and gas activity
obligations in the body of the contract, or in the Marketing Plan?  Is the
fuel plan included in the Marketing Plan?