---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 11:27 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           02/12/2001 07:26 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!

Look what this mean person made up about your school!
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 02/12/2001 07:26
AM ---------------------------

Christina Barthel@ENRON
02/12/2001 07:23 AM
To: Rafael Avila/NA/Enron, "Becky Bliss" <blbliss@hewitt.com>, Leon
Branom/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kim Chick/HOU/EES, Robert B
Cothran/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Anne Denley" <ADenley@vailresorts.com>, "jason
eggenburger" <jasonegg@hotmail.com>, Emily Ferguson/ENRON@enronXgate,
"Meredith" <meredith@friersoncpa.com>, Ryan Hinze/Corp/Enron, Shanna
Husser/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, "Toby Gouw" <tgouw@teamworks.ws>, Ben
Huxen/NA/Enron, "Juranek, Andrew A" <JuranAA@texaco.com>, Lynna
Kacal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Erin Landers" <elaggie99@hotmail.com>, "Jared
McDaniel" <jaredmcdaniel@hotmail.com>, "Anthony Moawad" <amoawad@kpmg.com>,
Chris Ochoa/NA/Enron, "Jaimie"<Jaimie_Parker@hotmail.com>, "Tracie Reed"
<traciereed99@hotmail.com>, "Brandon" <brandon.shimer@imgfinancialgroup.com>,
"Jose" <jose.a.suarez@us.pwcglobal.com>, Raul Yzquierdo/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!

From: "Kelly Kohrman" <pyrowoman@hotmail.com>
To: albert_ferrel@yahoo.com, ashbaylor@hotmail.com,
Ashley.Victorick@coastalcorp.com, aggie_guy21@yahoo.com,
CharlesPotterMail@yahoo.com, christina_ag99@hotmail.com, jadajot@yahoo.com,
jaf4678@neo.tamu.edu, j_a_garner@yahoo.com, laftamu@excite.com,
long@astrosfan.net, SLogan@TXLMortgage.com, AggieTia98@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 22:55:29

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - ut1.gif


Western Government Affairs
WEEKLY SCHEDULES
For the Week of July 9 ) 13, 2001

Paul Kaufman

Mon  7/9 Vacation
Tue  7/10 Vacation
Wed  7/11 Vacation
Thu 7/12 Vacation
Fri  7/13 Vacation

Sue Mara

Mon  7/9 San Francisco CA office
Tue  7/10 San Francisco CA office
  WPTF Board Meeting - Morro Bay [via phone]:  9:30 AM - 3:00 PM;
Kid duty, PM [tent.]
Wed  7/11 San Francisco CA office; Kid duty, PM [tent.]
Thu 7/12 San Francisco CA office
Fri  7/13 San Francisco CA office

Jeff Dasovich

Mon  7/9 Sacramento CA
Tue  7/10 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Wed  7/11 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Thu 7/12 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]
Fri  7/13 Sacramento/San Francisco CA office [TBD]

Mona Petrochko

Mon  7/9 San Francisco CA office
Tue  7/10 San Francisco CA office
Wed  7/11 San Francisco CA office
Thu 7/12 San Francisco CA office
Fri  7/13 San Francisco CA office

Alan Comnes

Mon  7/9 Portland OR office
Tue  7/10 Portland OR office
Wed  7/11 Portland OR office
Thu 7/12 Portland OR office
Fri 7/13 Portland OR office


I'll check.  I remember signing the faxes and signing the originals, but not
the return.  However, last week was the WEEK FROM HELL, so I easily could
have missed it.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           04/30/2001 07:59 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Signature Pages

Rebecca brought them up to you last week...

Kay Mann@ENRON
04/30/2001 05:50 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Signature Pages

This is really just an excuse to write - did you give me the executed pages?

Thanks,

ckm
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/30/2001 05:49
PM ---------------------------

"Wright, Tremaine S." <TremaineWright@paulhastings.com> on 04/30/2001
03:33:42 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'jkeffer@kslaw.com'" <jkeffer@kslaw.com>, "'mreuter@kslaw.com'"
<mreuter@kslaw.com>, "Kahn, Marguerite R." <MargueriteKahn@paulhastings.com>,
"DeBerry, Jeremiah A." <JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com>

Subject: Signature Pages

 Dear Kay,

As of this afternoon, we have not received Enron's original signature pages
for the Letter Agreement and Guaranty.  Have these been forwarded to our
office?  If so, please advise as to how they were sent and the expected date
of delivery; if not, please let me know when you will be able to send them.

Thanks,
Tremaine Wright

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/30/01 16:33:47
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address. Our new domain name is paulhastings.com.
In most cases, our address is composed of conventional first name and last
name plus @paulhastings.com. Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com. If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

==============================================================================


We have received executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreements from the referenced CPs dated 5/2/01 and 6/15/01, respectively.  Copies will be given to legal and credit.


Thanks for the information.  It will be very useful to the team!

>>> "Mary Hain" <Mary.Hain@enron.com> 09/07/00 03:50PM >>>

You requested the publicly available information underlying our slides, so you
could independently verify Enron's conclusions.  If you have any other
questions
please call me.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 12:47 PM
---------------------------

TIM HEIZENRADER
09/07/2000 12:30 PM

To:   Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Public Hydro Data Sources

Mary:

The public data sources that we routinely use for historical, realtime and
forecast hydroelectric data are:

     http://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil This site is operated by the Northwest
Division of the US Army Corp of Engineers, and includes both historical and
near-realtime water and power data for all Corp Columbia basin projects, as
well
as major USBR projects and non-federal mid-Columbia plants;

     http://www.nwrfc.noaa.gov This site is operated by the Northwest River
Forecast Center. It includes both assessments of current Columbia basin
streamflow conditions and forecasts of future conditions;

     http://www.mp.usbr.gov This is a Bureau of Reclamation site that
publishes
current data and forecasts for California's Central Valley Project (CVP)
plants;

     http://www.uc.usbr.gov  This is a Bureau of Reclamation site that
publishes
data and forecasts for Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) plant water
releases and power production;

     http://h2o.usgs.gov  This is a Geological Survey site that publishes
near-realtime data from automated streamflow gages, and

     http://www.cbr.washington.edu/dart/ This is a site operated by the
University of Washington that provides convenient access to historical
Columbia
River and tributary water data.

Of these, the sites most relevant to recent markets are probably the Corp'
Northwest Division site, which offers enough near-realtime generation data to
directly account for 75% to 80% of Columbia River energy production, and the
River Forecast Center, which provides snowpack-driven, long range volume
runoff
forecasts. The CVP data are a helpful index of California hydro conditions,
but
only represent about 10% of the state's installed hydro capacity.

Please forward this information to appropriate FERC staff.


AGA for 12/8/2000 is (158)

Website information:
http://gasfundy.corp.enron.com/gas/framework/default.asp
Drop down Box to "Storage"
In-house Analysis
My files are the last three files.

When the dialog box asks to upadate links click "NO".


Marie will verify this information first thing in the a.m.:

The Duke master is dated August 16, 1999.  It was sent for execution (to
Carol Graebner in Houston) on August 18, 1999.  I cannot verify whether
execution copies have been received by ECT.  Sara


So now I know why Sheila had a lock installed on her door.

Stephen Thome@ECT
04/19/2001 10:45 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ENA Incumbency Certificate

Kay,

You better leave your office unlocked tonight.

Steve

Kay Mann@ENRON
04/19/2001 08:09 AM
To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ENA Incumbency Certificate

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2001 10:09
AM ---------------------------

Jake Thomas@ECT
04/19/2001 09:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ENA Incumbency Certificate

Kay, I will be traveling to Houston today and expect to be in your office's
tomorrow morning or if needed, tonight

Jake

Kay Mann@ENRON
04/19/2001 04:12 AM
To: Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ENA Incumbency Certificate

Hi Ed,

Here's a certificate of incumbancy we need to Jake's Delta deal.  Can you
handle signature?  We can work with a fax today, but will need a fully
executed original for the bank.

Jake, we put a couple of Houston guys just in case something comes up.  We
have assumed that you will be executing the docs.  If there's any problem
with the list, please let me know.

We need this document to set up the escrow account today.

Thanks,

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/18/2001 03:41:06 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ENA Incumbency Certificate

 <<303%02!.DOC>>

Kay:

We may want to go ahead and circulate the ENA Incumbency Certificate for the
escrow.  I was holding it until the Salmon Incumbency Certificate revisions
were completed by Paul Hastings so that the two documents could be
circulated simultaneously, but I'm not sure they will get that document to
us in time to do both together.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 140106v2

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 303%02!.DOC


put this into the congestion redesign file if you haven't alread.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 09:55 AM
---------------------------

Susan J Mara@EES
05/16/2000 08:33 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: CAISO Congestion Model

Carl has been working with Enron and others and the ISO to develop a model
that works for CA as well as for the Desert Southwest (which the ISO would
then operate).  I think this summary explains the kinds of things were trying
to get in congestion management reform.  I'll send a few other things to look
at.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 05/16/2000 10:28
AM ---------------------------

	Carl Imparato

	04/24/2000 12:49:26 PM

Sent by: Carl Imparato
To: zalaywan@caiso.com
cc: smara@enron.com, curt.hatton@gen.pge.com, jim.filippi@gen.pge.com,
gackerman@wptf.org, alexp@eccointl.com, kewh@dynegy.com, skelly@iepa.com,
jstremel@apx.com, bmspeckman@aol.com
Subject: CAISO Congestion Model

Ziad:

Per our conversation this morning, attached is a summary of what I view to be
the key attributes of a "reformed" zonal congestion model.  The document does
not fully address all of the issues discussed at last Thursday's congestion
reform meeting in Sacramento, but I believe that (other than for some
details) it is consistent with what both the ISO and many of the market
participants are proposing.

This summary does not necessarily reflect the views of my clients, who
haven't yet had the time to review it... but I don't believe that it would be
too far off.

I am sending this summary to you to put into context the many comments that I
offered at last Thursday's meeting and also to support my view that, if the
ISO were to implement the CONG/ASM integration by DECENTRALIZING the process
rather than CENTRALIZING the process, there would not be much difference
between what I've been advocating in the Southwest and the CAISO's model.
(The primary remaining differences would be: (i) the way the "hour-ahead"
process works - i.e., continuously vs. one discrete time; and (ii) the way
scheduling is done - i.e., the ISO would not act as the SC's representative
in acquiring rights that could be made available through inter-zonal
counterflows since the SCs would do this themselves.)  So there is a real
possibility that, with some agreement on the ISO's longer-term plans (whether
integration of transmission rights and ancillary services procurement will
rely on decentralization vs. centralization), we could bring together the
models for the region.

Carl

[Sue, Curt, Jim, Gary, Alex, Kent, Steven, John and Barney: I'd appreciate
any feedback... but if you want me to see it, be sure to send it to
cfi1@tca-us.com, NOT the enron address from which this e-mail was sent.
Carl]


anyone up for woody's tonight around 9:30?


let's talk in person


Folks-
here is a summary of yesterday's meeting from Barbara.

Thanks,
Delaney

 - Summary of Tuesday 5 pm Meeting on DWR contracts.doc


talked to karen denne.  she saw presentation and agrees.  she's going to call sue.


The following servers will be coming down, please see below for more details and scheduled times

-------------------------------------------------------------

          SYSTEM OUTAGE NOTIFICATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

FOR:  PR1 - Apollo Production

Outage Start: (CST) 10/11/2001 at 10:30:00 PM

Outage End: (CST) 10/11/2001 at 11:59:00 PM

Outage Abstract:  System performance analysis

Outage Description: Performance analysis will be performed.

Outage Implication: no access during outage

Contact Name:basis on-call   #:  713-345-7282


Tuesday October 17, 9:17 pm Eastern Time

Calif. Reconsiders On Utility Fees

By MICHAEL LIEDTKE
AP Business Writer

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- California regulators agreed Tuesday to reconsider
whether utilities can charge customers for the billions of dollars in losses
that piled up during a summer of soaring electricity prices.

Responding to an emergency petition by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and
Southern California Edison Co. [AMEX:SCEq - news], the California Public
Utilities Commission left open the possibility of reversing five prior
decisions that blocked the companies from recovering the losses from
customers.

Regulators turned down the utilities' request for an immediate stay of those
past decisions, but the mere chance of rate relief may be enough to allow
PG&E and SoCal Edison to dodge a possible bullet in the stock market.

Had the PUC reaffirmed its previous decision, the utilities probably would
have had to write off several billion dollars in losses on their financial
statements in the third or fourth quarter.

Disclosures about the likely losses almost certainly would have been made in
a third-quarter Securities and Exchange Commission filing due by mid-November.

If the utilities were forced to make grim financial disclosures, ``it would
be very negative for the stocks,'' said Carol Coale, a utility industry
analyst for Prudential Securities in Houston. ``Right now, the fate of these
utilities is in the hands of their regulators and their bankers.''

Coale estimated PG&E faced the prospect of writing off as much as $3 billion
in losses this year.

PG&E had little to say about Tuesday's decision.

``This is a very serious issue and we want to thoroughly review the material
before commenting further,'' said PG&E spokesman Ron Low.

Consumer activists blasted the PUC's decision.

``This is a sop to the financial markets,'' said Nettie Hoge, executive
director for TURN, a San Francisco watchdog group. ``By reopening this case,
the PUC is unleashing a tsunami of lawyers that is going to come in and argue
why we should have to pay for these losses.''

TURN plans to release a report Wednesday contending that California utilities
have generated an additional $18 billion in revenue from deregulation, more
than enough to offset recent losses.

Harvey Rosenfield, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights, accused the PUC and Gov. Gray Davis' administration of ``caving in to
the utilities. These companies just want to be able to go to Wall Street and
say they still have a chance of getting this money back.''

PUC President Loretta Lynch did not return a call seeking comment.

Rosenfield said his group will ask the SEC to investigate whether accounting
laws require the utilities to write off their losses immediately.

San Francisco-based PG&E says it has lost $2.2 billion this year from a
freeze on electric rates imposed as part of industry deregulation.
Rosemead-based SoCal Edison places its losses from the freeze at about $2
billion.

The utilities are losing money because they must buy the power in the
wholesale market, where prices have unexpectedly tripled and, at times,
quadrupled over the past year. The freeze on their customer rates isn't
scheduled to expire until March 2002.

To insulate themselves, the utilities this week filed a petition with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission seeking to cap wholesale prices for
electricity at $100-per-megawatt hour. The current cap in California is
$250-per-megawatt hour.

The chasm between the utilities' wholesale costs and retail rates is hurting
the companies' standing on Wall Street.

In a filing with the PUC last week, SoCal Edison noted that ``the investment
community is expressing growing concern'' about the utility's ability to
recover its losses. SoCal Edison urged regulators to ``take action which
will, at a minimum, send the right signal to the financial markets.''