Get ready.  Beginning in November, electronic pay stubs will be available to all employees who have their paychecks direct deposited into their bank account.  Electronic pay stubs are an easy, fast, and efficient way for you to get your payroll information.  They will also help Enron to realize a considerable savings in time and dollars spent over traditional printed pay stubs.

If you prefer to receive a hardcopy of your pay stub, click on the link below to complete a request form.  This form must be submitted to Payroll by October 15, 2001.  Unless you submit a form your pay stub information will default to electronic viewing.

Please click on the link below.

Name:             THERESA STAAB
Personnel number: P00503481
Phone:            3035756485

If you have questions about electronic pay stubs, please contact Janice Priddy (Payroll) 713-853-7839 or Marie Newhouse (ClickAtHome) at 713-345-4185 or send an email to  Enron.Payroll@enron.com (Enron Payroll in Outlook).

Stay tuned for more details in the coming weeks.

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0810709/i.asp?r=21013&s=QEIEJFRC&l=9


It's a wonderful life.
Celebrate the moment.

No crowds. No traffic. No lines. Extraordinary gifts for
everyone on your list--all in one place. (Now that's
something worth celebrating.)
http://gifts.redenvelopegifts.com/cgi-bin9/flo?y=eHwH0CHdDH0DS20BJLo0Av

Who are you shopping for?
For her
http://gifts.redenvelopegifts.com/cgi-bin9/flo?y=eHwH0CHdDH0DS20BI6S0A5
For him
http://gifts.redenvelopegifts.com/cgi-bin9/flo?y=eHwH0CHdDH0DS20BI6T0A6
For baby
http://gifts.redenvelopegifts.com/cgi-bin9/flo?y=eHwH0CHdDH0DS20BI6U0A7
For kids + teens
http://gifts.redenvelopegifts.com/cgi-bin9/flo?y=eHwH0CHdDH0DS20BI6V0A8
View our entire collection
http://gifts.redenvelopegifts.com/cgi-bin9/flo?y=eHwH0CHdDH0DS20BJL20Au

Or click here to use our Gift Search
http://gifts.redenvelopegifts.com/cgi-bin9/flo?y=eHwH0CHdDH0DS20BI6X0AB

We wish you and your family a safe and happy holiday!
Thank you for shopping with RedEnvelope this holiday
season.
http://gifts.redenvelopegifts.com/cgi-bin9/flo?y=eHwH0CHdDH0DS20BI6Y0AC

**********************************************************************************
If you would prefer to receive the HTML version of our email, click
on My Account to access your RedEnvelope Profile, then click on
Email Settings and select "HTML".
http://gifts.redenvelopegifts.com/cgi-bin9/flo?y=eHwH0CHdDH0DS20BI6Z0AD
If you do not wish to receive further correspondence, please send an
email to mailto:UnsubscribeRedEnvelope@gifts.redenvelopegifts.com
and we will remove you from our email list.


I will be out on scheduled vacation next week and am sending you my contact info just in case . . .

Joanne & Richard Rozycki
2005 Cheryl Drive
Pearland, Texas 77581
(281) 485-9782
rozycki@iwon.com

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


It's just been put in - Mike forgot about an EES sleeve.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/13/2001 03:21 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 1 more missing deal

Prebon just sent over a confirm where Mike Swerzbin:
buys from EES 25 mw of Q2'01 Palo off-peak at $124.95.

Is this a good deal because they did not tell me about it?


Attached below are two seperate Credit Worksheets for the subject
counterparties.  Both requests are from Caroline Abramo who trades in New
York and Houston (You can reach her at 212-702-3910 or x3-6619).  She will be
visiting the counterparties soon and would like to have sent them the
documents within the month.

Thanks,

Veronica Espinoza
x6-6002


Drew,

Did you already approve this expense report and send it to accounting?

Denise

---------------------- Forwarded by Denise LaGesse/ET&S/Enron on 12/05/2000
10:50 AM ---------------------------

DENISE LAGESSE
11/16/2000 04:04 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Susan's expense report 11/16/00

Please approve the attached expense report and cc: me on your approval.
Thanks!


Mark:  It looks like Paul Simons got a copy of this e-mail.  Let me know if
it is useful  to work with ISDA on any of these matters.

Mark Haedicke
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 03:46 PM -----

	Ruth Ainslie <RAinslie@isda.org>
	06/07/2001 01:46 PM

		 To: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: FSA consultation paper:  Regulatory regime for Energy Market
Part icipants - ISDA Energy and developing products Committee

-----Original Message-----
From: Judith Birch [mailto:JBIRCH@ISDA-EUR.ORG]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Agnes Foy; alban caillemer; anna lawry; annette Hoener; anthony
redstone; arnaud duhamel; asa engstrom; benoit de Vitry; bernadette
Willis; brian peyton; Bruno Plaskow; Caroline Szatmari; carrie fleming;
charles barrett; Christian Bettley; christophe chassard; clare hatcher;
Claude Brown; Claude Unge; David Carter; david fransen; edward murray;
elisabeth bertin; Eric Rothman; fatima bentoumi; Fiona Smith; Gareth
Williams; heather pilley; iona levine; James Powell; Jay Hellums;
Jeffrey Golden; john fry; Jolie Norris; jon ibbotson; Joseph Carrico;
judith lawless; justin boyd; keir prince; laurence garside; lesley
stockwell; linda klein; louise bernstein; Louise Kendall; louise
kitchen; Luanne Giessen; maria garland; marion Sommerkorn; mary saul;
Mehboob Hoque; ned swan; nick perry; Olof Myhrman; paivi toivari; paul
castanon; paul newman; Paul Simons; pedro diaz; Per Westerberg; Peter
Verbiest; philip henderson; Philipee Lautard; pierre chevalier; rebecca
bond; rita pearson-schwandt; Robert Finney; roberto colacchia; Rosali
Pretorius; sanjev; sara rumberg; seema bal-thakrar; simon smith; steve
ciampi; Steven Crotch; thelma loshkajian; therese cochrane; thierry
groell; Thomas Jones; Thomas Werlen; Thomas Werlen; Tim
Arcedeckne-Butler; tjepco van voorst vader; tom hunter; tony fisher;
toshiro takino; Ulrike Schefe
Cc: Emmanuelle Sebton; Ruth Ainslie; Stacy Carey; John Berry; Peter
Werner
Subject: FSA consultation paper: Regulatory regime for Energy Market
Part icipants - ISDA Energy and developing products Committee

>    Dear all,
>
Pls find attached the FSA consultative paper on a new regulatory regime for
Energy Market Participants and an invitation for the ISDA Energy and
Developing Products Committee on 25 June at 3 pm, where this paper will be
discussed.

Any comments in advance of the meeting are welcome.

Deadline for the response to the FSA is 17 July 2001.

Could you pls confirm your attendance to Judith Birch at
jbirch@isda-eur.org.

>
>    <<fsajune.pdf>>  <<KDMemoJune601.doc>>
Thank you in advance.

 - fsajune.pdf
 - KDMemoJune601.doc


AGA for 3/9/01 is -75
In addition to the net withdrawal of 75 Bcf of working gas 3 Bcf of base was
withdrawn from the Producing Region for week ending March 9, 2001.

Website information:
http://gasfundy.corp.enron.com/gas/framework/default.asp
Drop down Box to "Storage"
In-house Analysis
My files are the last three files.

When the dialog box asks to upadate links click "NO".


This is an offer for investors from Financial Offers.  If you
have received this in error or no longer wish to receive
mailings from Financial Offers, please find the remove
instructions below.
________________________________________________

Dear Investor,

The market is in clear RALLY mode. Last week's NICE
MOVES-on top of growing strength this fall-are just a
harbinger of things to come.  Stocks are headed much higher
still.

There's no way they couldn't be.  Not starting from such
oversold levels.  Not with interest rates near zero.  Not with
easy money and the Feds pumping $100 billion or so into the
economy.

Since the beginning of October, the S&P is up 12%?the
NASDAQ is up 36%?and my entire POWERHOUSE
portfolio (that's every single stock I recommend, not some
made-up "best of" list) is UP 46%.  How about you?  Are
you making money like this-right now-or are you
MISSING OUT???

Take a look at some of the stocks my clients and I own-and
how well they're doing RIGHT NOW:

* Analysts are jumping back on the cell phone bandwagon.
Why?  New personal security issues; soaring sales in China;
and a generational shift in technologies.  Powerhouse Nokia
is UP 72% since in October 1st.

* Chip-makers that power sophisticated communications
devices are hot now, too.  Our Taiwan Semiconductor is UP
96%.

* And that's a boon for KLA Tencor, which provides critical
in-line testing equipment that keep small mistakes from
costing millions for chip-makers.  The stock?  UP 76% since
the beginning of October.

* Security is a HUGE issue now.  And many of the answers
that will make our lives and businesses more secure are
technology-based.  Security POWERHOUSE Check Point
Systems is UP 96%.

* What's more, this rally is exceptionally broad.  An
example-even the enterprise software sector is booming.
Since the beginning of October, our stake in Peoplesoft has
SOARED 127%!

Get the picture?  If you're sitting on the sidelines, you're
missing out!

I'VE GOT a dozen ways for you to make a pile of cash in the
months ahead.  But there's one HOT STOCK, in particular,
I want to tell you about today.  In fact, I've just put the
finishing touches on an Urgent Profit Bulletin detailing this
opportunity-and in just a bit, I'll tell you how to get your
FREE copy.

It's a LOW-RISK tech stock that can easily DOUBLE your
money by this time next year-then make your fortune
several times over in the years to come.  But sadly, most
investors will MISS OUT-because they believe the myth
about the so-called "glut" of fiber optic cable.

Here's the REAL story:

WHEN the World Trade Center got hit, the Internet slowed
down-very noticeably slowed down.  In fact, it nearly came
to a grinding halt!  That means there isn't nearly enough
capacity or redundancy built into the system to accommodate
a blip in demand.

Sources tell me that the government is very worried about
this problem.  After all, this is the second time it's happened.
Back in July, a tunnel fire in Baltimore slowed the Internet to
a crawl for two full days.

That means our communications systems-and therefore our
economy-are very, very vulnerable.

Ten years ago, it wouldn't have mattered.  But today,
commerce and security is COMPLETELY DEPENDENT on
those systems.  Virtually nothing moves without it.  That's
how banks and brokerages transfer funds?how dispatchers
route fleets of trucks?how many Americans get paid
through direct deposit.

And we are closer to the BREAKING POINT than 99.9% of
Americans even begin to understand.  Here's one example.

Qwest-one of America's biggest carriers-recently said
they're 60% loaded on their network.  That doesn't sound too
bad?until you understand how these networks operate.  You
can't load a network much past 65%.  In fact, 70% is
virtually CATASTROPHIC- because the network spends
so much time searching for open channels, it doesn't spend
any time actually sending packets of information.

The system locks.  Communications stops.  The nation comes
to a standstill.

AMERICA IS FALLING BEHIND the rest of the developed
world.  Internet traffic systems currently run faster in
Australia, Europe and even South America.  That's because
we push out more data than everyone else-but we're not
increasing capacity at anywhere near the needed rate.

We've got to catch up-and we've got to catch up fast!
Otherwise business, the economy and our national security
all go in the CRAPPER.

BUT WHY do we have this capacity problem amidst a "fiber
glut?"  Because  95% of all the fiber that has ever been laid
is "dark"-that is, it's not activated.  And the company I'm
recommending is the #1 supplier of the components needed
to do the job.  I'm looking at a DOUBLE-possibly a
TRIPLE by this time next year.  And I fully expect to
multiply our money five-times over by 2007.  In fact, this
stock truly has "ten-bagger" potential!

At the height of the boom, this company's stock was some
13-times higher.  So what changed?  Spending on
communications networks dried up.  Now the government is
ready to pump $100 billion in emergency spending into the
economy; interest rates are practically zero; and the need
isn't just vital for the economy anymore-it's a question of
NATIONAL SECURITY!

Please don't miss out.  You'll kick yourself big-time if you
miss out. Get this company's name--and full details--in my
urgent profit bulletin: 5-Times Richer By 2007.  It's yours
FREE -- just click here to sign up now:

http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=1AR216

Sincerely,

Michael Murphy
TECHNOLOGY INVESTING

P.S.  The longer you wait, the more profits you MISS OUT
on.  It's already UP 51% since October 1st, in recognition of
this company's vital new role in national security.  Yet that's
still some 90% off its old highs-so it has miles to run.

Dark fiber does no good.  Actual carrying capacity is strained
to the limits.  And get this-data traffic is DOUBLING every
year now.  That means a network running at 63% of capacity
needs to double its load by this time next year just to keep
up.  That's why the fiber must be lit.  That's why the fiber
will be lit.  Click here to get your FREE report now.

http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=1AR216

---
You are currently subscribed to stockfirst as: alewis@ect.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-stockfirst-37848R@mail.stockadvisor.ws


I am sending you some handwritten comments to this version.  I am going home
the rest of the day.  If this is something that has to be sent out today,
incorporate these comments in any new version.  Otherwise lets talk about it
tommorrow.

Mark Knippa
11/07/99 02:52 PM
To: Gerald Nemec
cc: Gregory L Sharp/HOU/ECT@ECT, mcourtn@ect.enron.com
Subject: Eastman - Term Sheet Proposal, draft

Gerald, (its Sunday and this is what I have)

Davis is going to make some changes that he and Courtney discussed yesterday
in addition to some more equipment and project details.  He will likely do
that tonight
at home so we will send an updated draft in the moring.

Defining the LLC stuff to them is not going to happen and will be removed
from this
document before packaging for Eastman.

The Force Majuere and other sections are going to be difficult to sell to
Eastman and
we are going to need to work on that portion tomorrow.

Have a great day.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT on 11/07/99 02:46 PM
---------------------------

Mark Knippa
11/07/99 02:46 PM
To: Davis Thames
cc:
Subject: Eastman - Term Sheet Proposal, draft


Lynne --

I am very sorry that I have not yet responded to your e-mail.  I am trying to firm up my calendar.  Not sure that Excelon and Enron will differ greatly on the key lessons learned.

I should know by mid-week (if you haven't already filled the slot).

Jim Steffes
713-853-7673

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lynne Kiesling <lynnek@rppi.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Lynne+20Kiesling+20+3Clynnek+40rppi+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 10:59 AM
To:	james_d_steffes@enron.com
Subject:	Follow-up on electricity restructuring conference invitation

Jim,
Just a quick note to follow up on the invitation I sent you last week for a November conference in San Francisco.  If you could let me know by Monday morning 8-6 if you can participate (which I hope you can), I'd be grateful, as that would leave us time to ask someone else.  Also, if you can't participate, I'd appreciate your recommending someone in your stead.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards, Lynne
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Electricity restructuring conference invitation
Date: 	Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:41:26 -0500
From: 	Lynne Kiesling <lynnek@rppi.org>
Reply-To: 	lynnek@rppi.org
Organization: 	Reason Public Policy Institute
To: 	james_d_steffes@enron.com

Dear Jim,
Insight Information Company (www.insightinfo.com) is developing and presenting a conference on Deregulation of Electricity Market in California: Experiences Learned, Perils and Opportunities (working title), and they have asked me to chair the conference.  Insight Information is a leading provider of programs for North American business, executive and professional communities.  The conference is scheduled for November 5 and 6 in San Francisco.  Tentative panel titles include
? Understanding Restructuring: The Regulator's Perspective
? The Role of Fuel Supply Mix
? Restructuring and Technological Change
? Price-Responsive Demand
? Energy Services and the Entrepreneurial Firm
? Energy Risk Management and Electricity Restructuring
? Restructuring and Transmission
? Market Monitoring
? Short-Term and Long-Term Approaches: Risk, Congestion Management, Institutional Change
? Comparative Experiences in Deregulation
I would like to invite you to participate as a speaker in this conference, in a session tentatively titled "Short-Term and Long-Term Approaches: Risk, Congestion Management, Institutional Change." I think the title will evolve, but what I'm going for in this panel is a discussion between you and Betsy Moler (Exelon) about short-run and long-run lessons that we should draw from the California experience.
If you could let me know soon if you would be able to participate in this conference, I'd be most grateful.  The conference coordinator, Victor Pogostin, would then follow up with a formal letter of invitation. I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Lynne
--
Lynne Kiesling, Ph.D.
Director of Economic Policy
Reason Public Policy Institute
www.rppi.org
lynnek@rppi.org
RPPI is a non-partisan public policy think tank promoting choice, competition, and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress


Peggy & John
The estate's DPR reporting requirement to risk controls in Houston is going to be twice a week.  Consistent with this I would also like to change our internal DPR reporting process for ECC Power-Estate from DAILY to twice per week.  Note that curves and an official calc will still be required daily.

I would like to make this change starting Feb 1.  Please let me know if you are okay with this.

Kathy

-----Original Message-----
From: Abel, Chris
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:34 PM
To: Hall Jr., Robert L.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Albrecht, Kristin; Reeves, Kathy; Gillis, Brian; Pearce, Barry; Miralles, Albert; Hall, D. Todd; Sweeney, Kevin; Earnest, Scott; Fondren, Mark; Swinney, John; Prejean, Frank; Horn, Cindy; Thurbin, Simon; Sharma, Shifali; Mao, Shari; Postlethwaite, John; Evans, Casey; Glover, Sheila; Carrington, Clara; Best, John
Cc: Beck, Sally; Wilson, Shona; Considine, Keith; Trevino, Susan; Ayala, Susie; Apollo, Beth
Subject: FW: DPR reporting for 22nd trading due today - request by Fallon

As a follow up to this email, we will start reporting the DPR's on Wednesday's and Monday's, for Tuesday and Friday valuations.  The first Wednesday will be the 30th of January.  Each day we should expect to report the positions, P&L and PRMA of only those transactions we expect to fulfill.  With the exception of Gas, Susan Trevino will be sending the benchmarks to each of the groups for their review.

If anyone anticipates any problems with this time frame, please call me or Shona to discuss.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Abel, Chris
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Hall Jr., Robert L.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Albrecht, Kristin; Reeves, Kathy; Gillis, Brian; Pearce, Barry; Miralles, Albert; Hall, D. Todd; Sweeney, Kevin; Earnest, Scott; Fondren, Mark; Swinney, John; Prejean, Frank; Horn, Cindy; Thurbin, Simon; Sharma, Shifali; Mao, Shari; Postlethwaite, John; Evans, Casey; Glover, Sheila; Carrington, Clara
Cc: Beck, Sally; Wilson, Shona; Considine, Keith; Trevino, Susan; Ayala, Susie; Apollo, Beth
Subject: DPR reporting for 22nd trading due today - request by Fallon

Fallon has requested a DPR be prepared 2X a week for positions that we are executing on (active/live positions only, no terminations or deals we are not executing on).  We have put together the shell of how this DPR will look.  To start this process we are planning to present to him positions (column E) and PRM value (column X) as of 1/23.  To do this, we have laid out the following steps:

- we need to get the PRM values directly from you (column X)
- we will run the benchmarks and need to work with you to ensure you are happy with the benchmark numbers we have pulled from RMS (the exception is gas, we need the gas risk group to provide the gas bench to us)
- we need all of then exceptions/qualifications to your numbers
- we will need the other information in the schedule to be reported to us starting next week, but not for this exercise

Please confirm to me/Shona that you can get us this info by 230 pm today.

Lastly, I am attaching the unofficialized book list as these books will not make it into the benchmarks and need you to confirm that there are no 3rd party positions in these books.

Thanks in advance

Chris Abel
Manager, Risk Controls
Global Risk Operations
chris.abel@enron.com <mailto:chris.abel@enron.com>
713.853.3102


I thought I had a bye week this past week.  Did I play?

>>> "Martinez, Ernesto Jr" <martier@cpchem.com> 11/13/01 10:02AM >>>
Once again, someone thought they could hang with the big DOG and ended up
with Canine Teeth marks on his ass.  Sorry Richard!  Marshall Faulk just
wasn't enough.  Don't take it personnal it's just the way it is.  Who dare
try to come to my yard next?

Fear the DOG!

Is anyone on the Red Division ever going to take control?

BTW Mark - You got knocked the f**k out!!


16:28:03 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Sager, Elizabeth'
16:28:03 Synchronizing Hierarchy
16:28:03 	   1 folder(s) updated in offline store
16:28:03 Synchronizing Favorites
16:28:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
16:28:21 	   66 item(s) added to offline folder
16:28:21 	   8 item(s) changed read-state in offline folder
16:28:21 	   4 item(s) deleted in offline folder
16:28:21 	   1 view(s)/form(s) updated in offline folder
16:28:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
16:28:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
16:28:22 	   11 item(s) added to offline folder
16:28:22 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
16:28:24 	   1 item(s) added to offline folder
16:28:24 	   2 item(s) updated in offline folder
16:28:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
16:28:24 	   2 item(s) added to offline folder
16:28:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
16:28:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
16:28:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
16:28:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
16:28:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Deleted Items'
16:28:24 Synchronizing Views
16:28:25 Synchronizing Forms
16:29:05 Done


Make $2000-$6000 Per Week From Home In The Next 90 Days  Are You Looking To Make More Money?  If you are currently looking to make more money or to add to your income or currently unemployed and have between 2 - 8 hrs per day. We have something for you that will change your current financial situation.  It is absolutely  100% FREE, Don't miss out on a real opportunity!   CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION


I spoke with Earl regarding the cost differences indicated for the Calpine -Topock interconnect.  The project files were discarded when the E&C Group moved to 3 Allen Center due to lack of storage capacity.  But Earl recalled that Jim Tucker said that the scope change was done at the request of Marketing which explains the two work order forms that you have.  E&C does not initiate project scope changes unless directed.

Since Calpine was supposed to "? install measuring station to Enron specs", the scope change items and labor (for EFM/RTU, battery backup, SCADA, and radio comm.) would have been provided by Calpine in the original work order for $68,900.  However, it is my presumption that Calpine felt that the scope change items were exotic and more suitable for Enron to handle directly; therefore, the scope change items may have been requested by Calpine to be furnished and installed by Enron at the revised work order amount of $113,900.  This type of scope change would have been consulted and approved by Marketing representation (Jeff Fawcett - Calpine rep.) prior to initiating the scope change work order.

EF x3-3395


Jeff, I wish you would have cleared this through me first due to the
implications in India. Keep me in the loop on all further announcements. JOe

Jeffrey Sherrick@ENRON
10/13/2000 03:26 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EGEP Sale Announcement

Ken, Jeff , Joe & Cliff,

This is a copy a note I sent to PR(Steve Kean & John Ambler), IR(Mark Koenig)
and Enron India(Sanjay Bhatnagar & Jimmy Mogal) regarding our internal
announcement to  EGEP/EOGIL employees in Houston and India on October 13,
2000.

On Friday (last night Houston time) we announced to employees Enron's
decision to sell Enron Oil & Gas India Ltd. (EOGIL), our subsidiary that owns
a 30% interest in the Panna, Mukta and Tapti concession areas.    We now have
bankers involved and a data room is being prepared in Houston which  made it
extremely difficult to keep the deal quiet any longer.  There were numerous
rumors circulating through the office, but the reality of the announcement
was still a shock to most of the employees in India and Houston. Basically we
said the following:
 1) Selling assets or companies is a routine part of Enron's strategy to
redeploy capital in the higher return opportunities.  The company has
exposure to a number of tremendous opportunities today that were not
envisioned even twelve months ago.  In line with this strategy, we are
placing EOGIL in the market.
 2) Depending on the success of finding an acceptable buyer for EOGIL,  we
will be reviewing the balance of our portfolio for transfer to other Enron
entities or for sale as separate packages.  We anticipate closing the EOGIL
transaction and rationalizing the remaining portfolio by March 31, 2001.
 3) Pending the success outlined in item #2, we will eliminate Enron Global
E&P as an Enron business unit on March 31, 2001.
 4) We announced some interim staff changes to facilitate the process.
  a) Jeff Sherrick would re-focus his time largely on the sale process
  b) Mike Stewart will be responsible for all India activity except the sale
process
  c) Steve Harper will be responsible for EGEP's sale activity and
coordination with our bankers and Corporate Development
 5) Commented on the potential impact to employees in general terms.  We told
them it was pre-mature to outline all of the possibilities until we signed a
PSA with a buyer.  However, in general, there is a good likelihood that many
people will either have opportunities for future employment with the buyers
or through redeployment within Enron.  Those people that do not remain with
the assets or are not redeployed in Enron will be involuntarily terminated
March 31, 2001 unless they are needed to close a transaction or to provide
transition services to a buyer.

I would like to keep this as low-keyed as possible.  Last year when we were
for sale there were not a lot of comments, but you never know.  If anyone in
the media picks up on this I would expect it to happen early next week.  Mike
Stewart is currently in India in the Mumbai office (01191228395841) and can
be reached at the Mariott after-hours(01191228577878).  He is fully briefed
on our position regarding the activities within EGEP and EOGIL.  Mike will be
traveling offshore and to Baroda over the weekend and on Monday.  I will be
available all weekend and next week at the following numbers; (work)
713-853-5934, (home) 281-320-2198, (cell) 713-569-4713.  I would suggest
talking with Mike or I before making any comments to the media if possible.

This afternoon I notified our partners and the Gov't of India of our
intention to market our assets.  I will be making a trip to India soon to
visit with the appropriate people in these organizations within the next two
weeks.  While I wouldn't expect this to happen, please refer any inquiries
from our partners (ONGC and Reliance) or the GOI to Mike or me.  As you might
expect, we want to be careful and consistent in our message to these
groups.

I will keep you informed regarding any changes to the above.  If you have any
questions, contact me at the above numbers.

jeff


Cary,
 Please review the attached netting agreement.  It only applies to the two
contracts referenced in Paragraph No. 1.  If acceptable, please print two
originals, sign and return to me.  I will have it signed by ENA and return a
fully executed original to you.


Credit terms will follow on this proposed master netting arrangement.

 Guaranties
	Outgoing:
	Original Date:
	12/16/96- Covered Counterparty: ENA covering TXU Energy Trading Company for $20MM of financial business
	4/1/98 -   Covered Counterparty: EPMI covering TXU Energy Trading Company for $30MM of physical power business
	7/1/00 -   Covered Counterparty: ECC and ENA covering TXU Energy Trading Company and TXU EnergyTrading Canada Ltd for $50MM of physical gas and other 		  petroleum related products
	Incoming: All entities guaranteed by TXU Gas Company
	Original Date:
	3/31/2000 - Covered counterparty: TXU Energy Trading Company covering $20MM of ENA financial business.
	10/12/01 - Covered Counterparty: TXU Energy Trading Canada Ltd and TXU Energy Trading Company for $25MM ofphysical and financial natural gas business with 		   ENA and ECC
	5/25/01 - Covered Counterparty: TXU Energy Trading company for $20MM of physical power business with EPMI

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


phys

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           01/26/2001 07:54 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Stats

Physical and financial?  or both?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           01/25/2001 12:10 PM

To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Stats

only volumes that were traded, i.e transacted during the cal year 2000 -
regardless of flow.

let me know

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           01/25/2001 11:56 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Stats

Even trades that won't start flowing or are still flowing this year?  I think
we can pull an EOL report on transacted volumes but I can't pull a report
that size until after trading today.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           01/25/2001 11:53 AM

To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Stats

Thanks.

I am looking for volumes that traded last year - not necessarily volumes that
flowed.  Volumes that flowed include term transactions.
Can you think of a way to find this info?

Eric

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           01/25/2001 11:08 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Stats

Hope this is what you were looking for.

---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
11:07 AM ---------------------------
From: Jim Little on 01/25/2001 10:59 AM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Stats

Here are the total volumes by quarter and by region.  We are looking into the
EOL since we do not have currently have regional information.  Perhaps you
have a way of estimating based on CPR?


Need to know if what they say is true on there protest to invoice.  Do we
only have an interruptible contract with them.


reg affairs can provide you a copy.   Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wadle, Susan
Sent:	Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:27 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:
Importance:	High

Kim, Eric is borrowing Kevin Hyatt's TW Tariffs (small) binder.  He has asked me to try to get one for him.  Does someone supply those or do I just need to have it reproduced for him.

Thanks!


Please send a test page to the Gas Control address as I am on it.

Thanks DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kenneth G Gruhl" <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kenneth+20G+20Gruhl+22+20+3Ckggruhl+40duke-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:58 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Cc:	DL-ETS Gas Controllers; kggruhl@duke-energy.com
Subject:	Re: FW: Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Tuesday Sept. 4, HE 8:00 AM to Wednesday Sept. 5, HE 7:00

Gas Control E-Mail address has been added to the distribution list.

                    "Schoolcraft,
                    Darrell"                     To:     "DL-ETS Gas Controllers" <DL-ETSGasControllers@enron.com>
                    <Darrell.Schoolcraft@        cc:     <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>
                    enron.com>                   bcc:
                                                 Subject:     FW: Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Tuesday Sept. 4, HE
                    09/04/01 08:30 AM            8:00 AM to Wednesday Sept. 5, HE 7:00

Ken this was forwarded to Gas Control.  Please add Gas Control to your
E:mail distribution list.

DS

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   "Kenneth G Gruhl" <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kenneth+20G+20Gruhl+22+20+3Ckggruhl+40duke-energ
> y+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:   Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:11 AM
> To:     Mulligan, Amy; Allen K Nielsen; blreese@duke-energy.com; Beck
> Mayberry; wralkema@pplmt.com; Christopher S Smart;
> dacluff@duke-energy.com; dlsmith@pplweb.com; dtedesco@duke-energy.com;
> Schoolcraft, Darrell; Darren Stephens; David Bowers; David P Pell;
> George X Ouzounian; jjbischoff@pplweb.com; jmtaggart@duke-energy.com;
> jpritchard@citlink.net; James Stebbins; kglenny@duke-energy.com; Kim
> White; mschneider@duke-energy.com; Michael Kerr; Michael Wells;
> rjnewson@duke-energy.com; rspear@pplmt.com; Sherry Davis; Steven
> Fliflet; Steven Fliflet; Ted Romo; Todd Hendricks; Tom Carlson; Tyler
> J Kristensen; ajreiter@duke-energy.com; kggruhl@duke-energy.com;
> pattersondw@bv.com; swansondj@bv.com; trading@pplmt.com
> Subject:     Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Tuesday Sept. 4, HE
> 8:00 AM to Wednesday Sept. 5, HE 7:00
>
> Plant Outage to remove ST screens started today.
> Target startup date is 9/9/01
>
>
> (Embedded image moved to file: pic05705.pcx)
>  - pic05705.pcx <<pic05705.pcx>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
(See attached file: pic05705.pcx)

 - pic05705.pcx << File: pic05705.pcx >>


Steve Kean asked me to forward this.

Scott_Bolton@enron.net on 09/14/99 03:16:46 PM

To:	Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kevin_Kohnstamm@enron.net

Subject:	ECI Issues memo

Steve/Rick -- sorry this is so late, but this should be a good starting point
towards position papers.

Kevin -- check this out and let me know if this is what you were thinking
about
for you and Steve Elliott's use.  If you want it spread sheet form I can do
that
as well.  Or if you need me to focus on issues specific to Network
Development,
I can do that too.

(See attached file: issues memo.doc)

 - issues memo.doc


I am excited to announce a major initiative called iBuyit, a new online
purchase and payment tool.  Each of you will be able to use iBuyit to order
or approve purchases from pens to pipe and cable to computers.  Our Global
Strategic Sourcing (GSS) and Global Accounting groups have teamed up with
each of your Business Units to build a tool designed to meet your specific
needs.

Special iBuyit features include:
? An eCatalog to help you quickly find the items you need
? Shopping baskets to store your purchases
? Simple recurring purchases
? Automatic routing of invoices for coding and approval

iBuyit will be implemented in stages across ETS, EBS, EES, EWS, Corporate and
Europe during 2001.

Over the next few months, you will be hearing more about iBuyit from your
business unit leadership, including what it can do for you and when you can
expect to use it.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000
11:34 AM ---------------------------

Susan M Scott
12/05/2000 03:29 PM
To: Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Christmas Party

Hey guys,

Just wanted to let you know that Kori Loibl has offered up her apartment as a
Pre-party spot.  The financial desk will be there as well as Purvi & her
boyfriend and  Mo "the bomb" Sanchez and her fianc,e John.  Don't know if you
guys have any interest, but the offer's open.  Either way, we'll have to find
someplace extend the festivities after the X-mas party shuts down...(the
Black Swan, Eu-grope-a, etc).

Susan


You have been selected to interview Real Time Candidate Darrin Presto (brother of VP Kevin Presto). Darrin has indicated that he would be available to interview early next week.

With that in mind, I would like to set up the interviews to take place on Tuesday, July 10th, beginning around 10:00am. Each interview would last about 45 minutes (max), so the last interview would finish around 1:45pm. If you are aware of any conflict with this day/time, please let me know as soon as possible. I would like to finalize this schedule today.

If you have any questions, please let me know!

Thanks,
Grace
x8321

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams III, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:52 PM
To:	Rodriguez, Grace
Subject:	RE: Wolf -Reply -Reply -Reply

Grace,
Let's go with the usual suspects on this:

Myself,
Greg Wolfe
Ryan Slinger
Chris Foster

Then either:
Murray O'Neill/Chris Stokely/Chris Mallory

Thanks,
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodriguez, Grace
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:21 PM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	FW: Wolf -Reply -Reply -Reply

Bill,

Any suggestions as to who should interview Darrin Presto? Let me know and I'll set it up!

Thanks,
Grace

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodriguez, Grace
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 9:23 AM
To:	Fitzpatrick, Amy; Williams, Bill
Subject:	RE: Wolf -Reply -Reply -Reply

Please let me know who you would like to interview Darrin, and when.

Thanks!

-Grace

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 7:35 AM
To:	Rodriguez, Grace
Subject:	FW: Wolf -Reply -Reply -Reply

Grace -

Please schedule an interview for this candidate to meet with me, Bill and anyone else that Bill recommends.   We need to treat this one 'right' - he is the brother of a VP in Houston........

Thanks!
Amy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wolfe, Greg
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 6:53 AM
To:	Williams III, Bill; Fitzpatrick, Amy
Subject:	FW: Wolf -Reply -Reply -Reply

Bill/Amy:

Attached is Darrin Presto's resume. I have met Darrin in the past and based upon my first impression he would be a good candidate for real time. Please set up an interview.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 5:46 AM
To:	Wolfe, Greg
Subject:	FW: Wolf -Reply -Reply -Reply

Cover letter and resume from my brother are attached.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Darrin Presto <Darrin_Presto@RSD.EDU>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Darrin+20Presto+20+3CDarrin+5FPresto+40RSD+2EEDU+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, June 28, 2001 6:37 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: Wolf -Reply -Reply -Reply

Kev,

Here is everything.  Keep me posted.

 - ENRONC~1.DOC << File: ENRONC~1.DOC >>
 - ENRONR~1.DOC << File: ENRONR~1.DOC >>
 - ENRONR~2.DOC << File: ENRONR~2.DOC >>


Attached is the TW Weekly report for February 22, 2002.

Jan Moore
X53858


As you all know, third-party access in gas and power in Germany is on a
negotiated basis.  You do not need to read below, but the highlight is that
the trade association, VIK, representing industrial users of energy, has
walked away from the negotiations of a third-party access regime in the gas
industry in Germany.  This is a real political blow for the German Economics
Ministry, which has been very resistant to regulated third-party access, in
the belief that negotiations were the way to proceed.  Just a brief update
for all of you.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 19/12/2000
09:39 ---------------------------
   Viviana Florio                19/12/2000 09:07

To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FYI: After yesterdays failure to make any progress: VIK steps out of
Gas-VVII negotiations on improved grid access conditions

Hello,

sorry, I forgot to mention this at yesterday's staff meeting.

Viviana
---------------------- Forwarded by Viviana Florio/FRA/ECT on 19/12/2000
10:13 ---------------------------

Carsten Haack
15/12/2000 18:30
To: Andreas Radmacher/FRA/ECT@ECT, Jacob Meins/FRA/ECT@ECT, Carsten
Sterz/LON/ECT@ECT, David Gallagher/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT,
Thomas Schmitz/FRA/ECT@ECT, Helge-J_rgen Beil/FRA/ECT@ECT, Uta
Dernedde/FRA/ECT@ECT, Suryan Wirya Simunovic/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael
Schuh/FRA/ECT@ECT, Christopher McKey/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Kreuzberg/FRA/ECT@ECT, Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Viviana Florio/FRA/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: After yesterdays failure to make any progress: VIK steps out of
Gas-VVII negotiations on improved grid access conditions

Yesterday was the last "negotiation" round before the scheduled meeting with
the minister of economics on Monday
Again no suprises yesterday: The gas incumbents did not move an inch on the
three current issues:
-access to storage
-management of capacity constraints
-transparency

Somewhat as a suprise came the attached letter plus press statement today
from VIK stating that they are not willing to spend any more time without a
significant change on the gas side. This decision was supposingly driven by
board members of VIK today.

From our prospective it is good news that VIK (finally) takes a stand to get
some REAL improvement in the access conditions.
Details psl see attached (german) press statement:

Happy to answer any questions

Carsten


I just talked to Chris about this. Apparently, the Reliant trader thought he
was clicking an SP-15 trade, and called immediately afterward to ask Chris if
it could be adjusted. It was more lucrative for Chris to do this deal at
SP-15 than NP-15 anyway, so he agreed. I guess I'm unclear about the exact
EOL guidelines in a situation like this, but please let me know if there's
anyone you'd like me to talk to. Chris didn't have the trader's name offhand,
but I could probably get him to research it a bit more. Just let me know what
you need from us.

Thanks,
Kate

From: Kimberly Allen on 04/05/2001 10:43 AM CDT
Sent by: Kimberly Indelicato
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changed an EOL trade

Kate,
#562373 was an EOL trade that Chris Mallory did. When it was done on line the
delivery point was NP-15 now in Enpower it has been changed to SP-15. Could
you check with Chris if this is correct. I thought that we were not allowed
to change EOL trades. If he did then I will have to get with Legal to find
out what our next step would be.

Thanks,

Kimberly

Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
Kimberly Indelicato Office:713-853-3031
Trading Support Fax:713-646-2443
kallen3@enron.com


Notes from subject mtg.  Steve Stein - please schedule something where we can
get together and I can hand this off to you.  Need your involvement.

0)  Prior to the meeting - I had called Ben to let him know of my
transitioning to EES and that I wouldn't be there - he requested that I
come.  Keith Dodson reviewed and requested that I attend and xtion w/ Steve
Stein.  Steve Stein was to come to meeting, but didn't show.  Steve has been
requested to take charge by Keith Dodson.
1) Kay Mann, Ben Jacoby, Chris Booth, Ron Tapscott, and myself were present
at the subject meeting.
2)  Noone from EAS came except for me.  I called and Rigby came late.
3)  Discussed situation - Calpine evidently bought the Nov01 Westinghouse
Machine from Westinghouse, ending Calpine's interest in our "wet" 501D5A.
4)  Everyone agreed that Westinghouse wasn't "focussed" on resolving this.
Kay reminded the group that prior to litigating the contract called for a
"high level Mgmt meeting".  Everyone seemed to agree that it was time to call
such a meeting.
5)  Rigby to draft a rebutal letter to the 15 Feb Westinghouse letter (where
they again inferred that they had delivered the Generator, and if we wanted
the new one....., we needed to provide a purchase order).  In that letter,
Rigby will confirm that a)  we don't believe the machine was ever delivered,
b)  we have been delayed/impeded, and c)  LD's to the tune of approx $4MM are
due, and c)  we request the "high level mgmt meeting" prior to initiating
litigation.
6)  Letter will go out with Dan Shultz's signature - need highest level just
below Keith Dodson.  Since Dan had been involved...., the team chose him.  We
might consider putting the letter out under Steve Stein's name.  The letter
will also request that all future correspondance be addressed to John Rigby
(this was Ben Jacoby's request).
7)  Ben requested that if Dan Shultz gets any documents or calls......, that
he refer them to John Rigby.
8)  Kay to edit letter and get out the door Fri 23 Feb.
9)  Rigby working w/ Jim Boullion to expedite insurance
inspection/verification of coverage.  Bouillion will keep Rigby appraised.
Inspection needed ASAP to confirm Generator is "totalled".  Evidently, the
crate has now been opened, but....., our insurance inspector hasn't come
yet.
10)  Rigby to send email to Ben Jacoby's team every two days, detailing
progress/req'ed action.  The entire team is disappointed in the combined lack
of effectiviness of the "team" in getting this issue handled/resolved.
11)  Ben requested that EAS have their best resouce available to inspect the
generator with the insurance inspector - the team believes this should be Jim
Sutherland or his designee/equivalent.  Chris Booth to acompany also.
12)  Kay Mann confirmed that she had discussed the situation with the ENA
origination team that was "... on the ground..." at VEPCO...., and they
thought it was funny that anyone would think that the slipped Generator
delivery date didn't "delay or impede" our efforts to close that deal.  Also,
Kay reminded us that there was no tie between a specific project, and the
"delay/impede".
13)  At the high level Westinghouse meeting - who will be the senior Enron
rep?  Kevin Presto was discussed by Kay/Ben.  I discussed Steve Stein.  To be
discussed further.  At that high level meeting....., we need to insure that
Westinghouse sees that Enron really was "delayed/impeded" .  Until they
believe our claim for LD's has merit - they probably won't attempt to
compromise on a settlement.  Westinghouse has offered to give us our money
back (not confirmed, but Mark has offered to run that up the flagpole).  Ben
has requested approx $4MM more to cover IDC.  Westinghouse has said.... "no
way".  So...., we have approx a $4MM dispute.  Westinghouse doesn't believe
we have been delayed or impeded - they are not aware that we were in fact
impeded on Electrocities, nor are they aware of the broad interpretation of
delay/impede that would require them to pay LD's.  The team believes
Westinghouse is acting like they "delivered" the generator (in June 00), so
they can "act" like there should be even another reason that they don't owe
LD's.  The team believes that Siemen's position on "delivery" will change
once they debate that with a Rigby, Schwartzenburg, or a Kay Mann

Fred Kelly
Phone     713-646-6207
Mobile     713-851-9172


Hi Kate,

ref 476601
Tom Alonso
Prebon shows this deal as Enron buying and Morgan selling

   Kate Symes @ ECT                12/07/2000 05:10 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 12-7-00 Checkout

Mike is entering that deal right now. I'll get back to you with the deal
number.

Thanks,
Kate


Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 08:48 AM -----

	Greg Brazaitis
	05/07/2001 04:32 PM

		 To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Brazos Valley Project, L.P.; Comments on the Draft Interconnect
Agreement

Eric,
I received the following request for changes from Avista Steag through Pace
Global for the Brazos Valley Project Interconnection Agreement.  Please
review and comment:

Item 2.   Engineering, Design and Construction:
In the fourth line, after the words " ...sound and prudent natural gas....",
add the phrase "and with sound and prudent natural gas pipeline" industry
practice'  .

Item 5ii. Quality Specification and Measurement:
In the second line, after the words "...to the Standards.", add the phrase
"and with sound and prudent natural gas pipeline industry practice".

Item 9.  Term.
Delete the paragraph on term and add the following:  "This Agreement shall be
effective as of thes date herein writtten above and shall remain in full
force and effect for a primary term of twenty years ("Primary Term"), and
shall continue in full force and effect thereafter so long as there is an
agreement in effect that provides for the delivery or receipt of gas by or
for HPL or its affiliate(s) or designee(s) at or through the Delivery Point
("Transportation Agreement"); provided, that after the Primary Term of this
Agreement, upon the expiration or termination of any such Transportation
Agreement, either Party may terminate this Agreement upon 60 days prior
written notice to the other Party.


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Tuesday, October   30, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Monday, October   29, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	         $27.00	         $23.00	         $25.55	-   6.48	          80,000
Comed	         $26.00	         $22.15	         $23.78	-   4.10	           4,000
Entergy	         $30.50	         $26.25	         $27.46	+    .96	          16,000
Nepool	         $39.25	         $37.00	         $37.37	-   2.61	           8,000
Palo Verde	         $40.00	         $37.50	         $38.79	+   4.72	           5,600
PJM-West	         $28.50	         $27.50	         $28.02	-   4.23	          50,400
SP-15	         $38.65	         $37.80	         $38.24	+   4.46	           4,000
TVA	         $27.50	         $26.75	         $27.07	-   6.04	           4,000

                                                                                Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


This deal has been changed to a NYMEX swap at $8.14.

Thanks,

Errol

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Diane Anderson                           02/09/2001 09:12 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: QF4314 (EOL 672213) QF4331 (EOL 672217)

Hi Errol.  Have you had any luck with these two deals?

Thanks, Diane

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001
09:12 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Diane Anderson                           02/07/2001 10:34 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: QF4314 (EOL 672213) QF4331 (EOL 672217)

Hi Errol & Sherry,

We received confirmations for the above referenced
deals from Paribas (they confirm us) and Paribas' confirm
differs from what we show in TAGG.  Paribas' trader, Herve,
says that he spoke with John Arnold after the deal was done
and changed the price from 8.15 to 8.14 and the index from
Gas Daily to NYMEX.     TAGG still reflects the terms that
EOL has.

Can one of you please find out if John Arnold agreed to these
changes, and if so, can you make the necessary changes
to TAGG?

Let me know.
Thanks a lot,
Diane
3-0443


Neartown Leaders & Neighbors,

Today, Thursday, March 21st, is the NTA Leadership meeting at 7pm, Cherryhurst Park Community Center, 1700 Missouri.

An open meeting to anyone that wants to watch your community leaders come together to deal w/ neighborhood issues. Please be sure to have someone there from your neighborhood, community or association.

With the CIP early March meetings behind us, NTA turns its attention to your neighborhoods concerns and issues.

A... 1..February minutes.
B....2.. Old Business...CIP, Quick Overview. March 29th is the CIP request deadline. Questions or concerns, call me at 7-616-0800 or Bridget in Council Member Ada's office, 7-247-2001.
B...3..Keep Houston Beautiful presentation resulting in several groups, including Park Civic, that will pick up litter in their neighborhoods this Saturday as part of as city-wide event.
B.. 4...CM Annise Parker needs 4 or 5 volunteers for this sat morning for Westheimer & montrose. Call Stephanie in her office at 7-247-2014, to tell her you want to participate. Free lunch & T-shirt, too!

C..1.Task Force Formation: Half-way houses in the neighborhoods. Lesson learned last year...must use the preceding year to a state legislative year to prepare documentation, background and language for any bills expected to be seriously considered in the legislative year. task force to do the above in reference to prohibiting, limiting and/or regulating the placement of all types of half-way houses, facilities for addiction and chemical dependency, and sites for treatment programs in Montrose. State senator Ellis, State representatives Danberg, Coleman and Farrar see the need and without our help, it will not happen.

C.. 2..Task Force Formation: Meet Your Elected Official Event 2003. To avoid last minute hassles, to maximize the potential of this important event and to add real depth and fun to it, a few volunteers are needed to make this happen next January. I'll continue to do what I do best, get the notables there and the restaurants to donate food.

D...Crime in the 'hood. What's it like in your area? Have heard really scary things from Park Civic and other areas. East Montrose is responding by organizing a Citizens on Patrol. Why the increase in crime?  What can we do about this w/ HPD?

E...Neartown Little League Opening Game Day Parade & Ceremony this Saturday at Dunlavy Park

F..Civic club/association reports....(the most interesting part of the meeting, I think)

G...Reliant-HL&P update.

What else?  Go home.

Thanks

Ed Gonzales
Neartown Association, 2001-02 president
713-526-2759        pg713-616-0800
fax713-529-4592   edgonzales@EV1.net
1518 Morse, Houston, TX 77019


thanks.  i'll be here.


This is pretty eerie!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:21 PM
To:	Heard, Marie; Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha
Subject:	FW: The Face

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allario, John
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:58 PM
To:	Pacheco, Leonardo; Carter, Carl; Cummings, John; Reinfeld, David; Philipson, Fred; Hernandez, Lorie; Eichmann, Marc; Higgins, Ned; Michael Allario (E-mail 2); Kieran Gibbons (E-mail); Mike Axton (E-mail); Mike Darrow (E-mail 2); Paul Schneidau (E-mail); Alan Cormack (E-mail); Karen Zawadzki (E-mail); Karl Stewart (E-mail); Kathy Zawadzki (E-mail); Sophie Boutopoulos (E-mail); Elizabeth Kamp (E-mail)
Subject:	The Face

See the image in this picture.


do you want me to go?

Shanna Husser@ENRON
03/20/2000 01:15 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hey-

April 10th Astros game vs. St. Louis- do you want to go??  I need to let them
know if I want another to get on the list for an extra ticket.

SH


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------

Schang@cook-inlet.com on 09/25/2000 09:47:26 AM
To: mlenhart@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Ones that didn't make Sydney

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim, Richard J [mailto:Richard.Kim@West.Boeing.com]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 12:55 PM
To: 'mchoi@sunamerica.com'; 'schang@cook-inlet.com'
Subject: Ones that didn't make sydney

 <<BRONZE.mpg>>  <<GOLD.mpg>>  <<javelin.mpg>>  <<SILVER.mpg>>
the gold is the best

 - BRONZE.mpg
 - GOLD.mpg
 - javelin.mpg
 - SILVER.mpg


Hi Matt,

This is the document that I referenced in my voice mail.  It would be great
if it could be compared against the  agreement for the Wilton Center.  I will
call later to see if you've had any luck.  As you can guess, this is on a
short fuse.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/20/2000 06:40
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/19/2000 03:41 PM

To: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Kendall New Century Development,LLC; Plano Letter of Intent

Hi Herman,

Here's the agreement I referenced in my voice mail.  We will change it so
that they can't buy any equipment without further written authorization from
Enron.  Anything else?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/19/2000 03:39
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
07/11/2000 02:29 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Kendall New Century Development,LLC; Plano Letter of Intent

Ben:

Attached is the ComEd Letter of Intent to interconnect at the Plano TSS.  In
addition, ComEd has included a cover letter which indicates a significant
level of uncertainty regarding a '01 interconnect at Plano.  Under the
guidelines of Appendix K of ComEd's Open Access Transmission Tarriff, we are
required to execute this LOI within 15 days of the date of receipt (7/7/00)
in order to maintain our current position (6/12/00) in the ComEd queue.  If
we execute after 7/22/00, then the date our date in the ComEd queue becomes
the date of execution of the LOI.

Appendix K provides that once the LOI is executed, ComEd shall provide Enron
with an Interconnection Study (IS)  and Project Diagram (PD) within 45 days
(ComEd has the option to extend another 30 days, if needed).  The IS and PD
will provide Enron with a description of the upgrades required and an
estimate of the proposed allocation of the cost to interconnect.  The IS and
PD do not provide Enron with information on transmission availability (ie
ATC), this would be addressed by the Interconnection Feasibility Study
currently in progress by ComEd (I am expecting the results of this IFS in the
next 2-3 weeks).

ComEd informed me in a discussion yesterday afternoon that their current
interpretation of AppendixK provides that if the commercial start date of a
proposed IPP project is delayed, that there is no impact to that proposed
projects' queue position relative to competing projects provided that all
interconnection milestones (LOI, PD, Notice To Proceed, and IA) remain
current.  ComEd further indicated that such a delay would result in a project
with an inferior queue position (i.e. Wizvest) being charged with the
necessary system upgrade costs even though their project would come on line
prior to the project with the superior queue position.  I will request that
this interpretation be confirmed by ComEd in writing to Enron. (This
interpretation obviously has a large value implication for the Torrence site
relative to the Wizvest planned '01 interconnect).

I will review this letter on the plane to Houston this afternoon.  I believe
that it authorizes ComEd to spend up to $100K on engineering related to the
interconnect design.  It also addresses the ordering and payment
responsibilities for long-lead equipment required to facilitate the proposed
interconnection.  Based upon our development budget discussions earlier this
week,  we obviously do not want to incurr long-lead equipment charges prior
to having a clear value proposition in our sights.  I will have
recommendations ready for you on these issues by Wednesday.  I am
simaltaneously forwarding it to Kay Mann for her review so that we will be in
a position to move forward to execution prior to 7/22 if we choose to do so.
From a legal standpoint, this is ComEd's boilerplate LOI.  I believe that we
executed a similar LOI for Wilton Center in early 1999 under Des Plaines
Green Land Development, L.L.C.

Call me if you wish to discuss.

Fred
---------------------- Forwarded by Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000 05:24 PM
---------------------------

<Bruce.L.Tanouye@ucm.com> on 07/07/2000 03:57:31 PM
To: fred.mitro@enron.com
cc: Carter.C.Culver@ucm.com, Robert.D.Koszyk@ucm.com
Subject: Kendall New Century Development,LLC; Plano Letter of Intent

Fred,

Thank you for your request to Interconnect nw generating facilities per your
request to, Steven T naumann, Transmission Services Vice president. Please
execute the Letter of Intent per the attachments to maintain your place in
the queue of Applicants fo interconnection.

 <<LOI attachmwn_7_7_00enron plano.doc>>  <<1XM10!7.7.00.DOC>>

Thank You,

Bruce L. Tanouye
Com*Ed Transmission Services
Independent Power Production Services
Phone:  708-410-5276
Fax:  708-410-5900
E-Mail:  bruce.l.tanouye@ucm.com

******************************************************************************
***
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Unicom proprietary
information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright
belonging to the Unicom family of Companies.  This E-mail is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  If
you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation
to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful.  If you have received this E-mail in error, please
notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and
any copy of this E-mail and any printout.  Thank You.
******************************************************************************
***

 - LOI attachmwn_7_7_00enron plano.doc
 - 1XM10!7.7.00.DOC


thanks for handling this.

pf

	Tana Jones@ECT
	11/29/00 04:05 PM

		 To: Dovie Keprta/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Paul Finken/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: NDA-PurchasePooling, Inc.

We have received the executed Non-Disclosure Agreement dated 11/29/00 with
the referenced counterparty.  A copy will be provided to Dovie.


PG&E Energy Trading-Power L.P. - West Physical Power only.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	04/23/2001 05:56 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Please let me know immediately if you have any issues with the PG&E entities
at the bottom of this email trading the listed products.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 05:55 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/23/2001 05:35 PM

		 To: Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Lisa/Stephanie, could you please ensure that the trading profiles for each of
the three PG&E entities are changed below such that by tomorrow morning they
will be able to transact once we restore their headroom once we enter it into
the system?

Tana, are you OK with restoring the changes reflected below?  I'm thinking
that since they had this transact ability once before, that it should be OK.

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF THERE WILL BE ANY PROBLEMS.

Thanks all!

Walter

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:08 PM
To: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: FW: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Walter,

Could you ensure that the profiles are set-up accordingly and that CAS is
populated with a $5million minimum for each of these cp,s.

I do not want to turn them on in Datamanager until tomorrow am.

tm

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Conwell, Wendy
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 4:59 PM
To: Moran, Tom
Cc: Bradford, William S.; Ngo, Tracy; Sacks, Edward; Radous, Paul
Subject: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Tom,

Per our discussion with Bill, please set up the following PG&E counterparties
on EOL providing for transactions having a maximum tenor of 12 MONTHS:

PG&E Energy Trading - Power L.P.-------> Physical Power
PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Corporation---------> Physical Canadian Gas
PG&E Energy Trading - Gas Corporation---------->Physical and Financial US Gas

Thanks,
Wendy


In conversations with GE, it is their understanding that their guaranty will
not be transmitted until there is a fed ref number tomorrow.  The opinion
letter will be faxed as soon as the GC is available, or Kent can sign for Dan
Rowley if that is acceptable.  DRowley can sign originals on Thursday.

The LOC is in the works, and GE understands that 10% will be retained in
escrow until the LOC is delivered.

There will be three original opinions.  There is one original guaranty, and
I'm not certain of GE's willingness to give more than that.  Obviously, there
will be only one LOC.

Kay


Melissa Allen, formerly with Arthur Andersen and assigned to the Enron
account, has taken over Beth Apollo's role for EEL.  She reports to Fernley
Dyson, as did Beth.

I was in the London office last week.  As a result of some of my discussions,
Mike Jordan asked that James Scribner make a visit to cover the operations
pricing model and to discuss some issues around global counterparty
database.  Mike has suggested that James come to London during the first week
in February, which sounds as if it will coincide with your trip.  Please
coordinate with James so that your agendas are in sync (in case of potential
overlap) so that we don't convey a right hand/left hand lack of
coordination.  Since your agenda mentions GCP, there may some meetings that
you are planning that would be appropriate for James to join.  By copy of
this memo, I am asking James to do the same with you.  Thanks.

	From:  Joel Henenberg @ ENRON                           01/26/2001 02:32 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: London Trip

Greetings Sally!  Thank you for taking the time to attend our presentation, I
truly hope you found it informative.  I definitely have a better
understanding of your concerns with Risk and we will work towards resolving
some of them.  Hopefully I can report some positive results at our next
presentation.

I have a trip planned for London the week of Feb. 5.  My initial topics
include:

GCP - NG Several meetings scheduled with Brian Lindsey Hunter and Gail Hill
to discuss User Acceptance Testing, Test Scripts, Resources and Schedules.

Global Systems Facilities and Contracts - Discussions with Gail Hill, Matthew
Allen and others as identified to discuss Scope, Timing, Resources and
Regulatory requirements.

Livelink/iRIMS - Discussions with Paul Jones regarding Vendor support,,
Security Standards (Requirements and Elaboration), differences in security
between Livelink and iRIMS, Standards Committee, current project status,
testing, release of new versions, change management control, enhancements and
processes.

Steve Whittiker (Michael Jordan sometimes joins us) -  System initiatives
London and Houston, MKM, Envision, Global Systems.

I would also like to meet with Beth Apollo's successor if possible.
Hopefully you can tell me who that is.

Regards

Joel


Attached is a summary of the New York RTO Order issued by FERC late
yesterday. I apologize for the length, but I wanted to include a number of
quotes from the Order that repeat arguments that we have been making over the
past few years. In a procedural Order issued today, FERC has scheduled the
Northeast mediation process to begin next Thursday, July 19th.


Attached please find a follow up to today's Natural Gas market analysis.

Thanks,

Bob McKinney

 - 10-9-01 Nat Gas intraday update.doc


Professor Kothari:
Thank you for the communique. Your recollection regarding a "next step" for
Enron is correct - we are currently working
to define Enron's key issues and research questions. The group will reconvene
this week. Following that meeting, I
will provide an update to you regarding our progress.
With regards,
 Amy Oberg

"S.P. Kothari" <kothari@MIT.EDU> on 08/07/2000 07:43:41 AM
To: aoberg@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Enron - NEVRL - AA meeting on July 27

Dear Amy:

Thank you and your colleagues for taking the time to video-conference with
us at MIT and AA professionals associated with NEVRL.  I  enjoyed the
exchange and was left impressed by the technical savvy and keen interest in
research on part of Enron.  I look forward to hearing from you sometime
soon.

As I recall, we agreed that Enron would forward a few issues/questions that
NEVRL could potentially address.  Once we have a meeting of minds on the
set of issues, we can discuss further how best to collaborate and
accomplish our goals.  I believe both sides would benefit immensely.  MIT
faculty can research questions relevant to industry and you might receive
some answers you are looking for!

With best regards,

S.P.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
Professor S.P. Kothari    Phone: (617) 253-0994
Gordon Y Billard Professor   Fax: (617) 253-0603
    of Accounting     E-Mail: kothari@mit.edu
Sloan School of Management, E52-325 Web: http://web.mit.edu/kothari/www/
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
50 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02142-1347
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------


Great, would you reply that we may need up to six chairs, but we will know the exact count within the next week.  Also, ask her about a table cloth to see if we can borrow it.

Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Watson [mailto:john.watson@pdq.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: FW: Table for 9/15

FYI...

-----Original Message-----
From: management [mailto:management@the-spires.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:20 AM
To: Kim & John Watson
Subject: Re: Table for 9/15

Mrs. Watson -

There is a 6ft portable table you can use for your event.  Let me know if
you need any chairs, we have 12 available.

Lizette.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Kim & John Watson" <john.watson@pdq.net>
Reply-To: "Kim & John Watson" <john.watson@pdq.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 21:09:55 -0500

>Lizette -
>
>Would it be possible for us to use one of the long portable tables from the
>Parlor on Saturday, September 15?  We're having a dinner party and need
>additional seating.
>
>Please let us know if it is available.
>
>Thanks,
>Kim Watson
>kwatson@the-spires.com
>
>


This is to nominate 75,000 MMBtu/d into Eastrans from HPL for Wed, 4/12/2000.

20,000 MMBtu/d will be redelivered into PG & E
 7,800 MMBtu/d will be redelivered into HPL from Fuels Cotton Valley
15,000 MMBtu/d into HPL's Cartwhell at Carthage
17,200 MMBtu/d into Mobil Beumont @ HSC - $.0375
15,000 MMBtu/d into Mobil Beaumont @ HSC - $.055

Sherry, I got your write-up and am working on it.

Thanks.


This is not about politics, but about our military.  Please read "reply
1".-Larry

?http://lucianne.com/threads2.asp?artnum=67457
 - Threads2.url


Attached is current schedule of visits.

Ron

Ronald Doades & Company
Phone:  (973)- 376-5805
Fax:       (973) 376-5961


I received a message from John and evidently he sent it to JP Lewis to work on.  I haven't heard back from Casey.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: White, Stacey W.
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Abel, Chris
Cc: Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John
Subject: RE: DPR reporting for 22nd trading due today - request by Fallon

Make sure you talk to Casey & John.  Most of my Houston group has been out of the office either this morning or this afternoon for a UBS orientation.

Stacey

-----Original Message-----
From: Abel, Chris
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Hall Jr., Robert L.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Albrecht, Kristin; Reeves, Kathy; Gillis, Brian; Pearce, Barry; Miralles, Albert; Hall, D. Todd; Sweeney, Kevin; Earnest, Scott; Fondren, Mark; Swinney, John; Prejean, Frank; Horn, Cindy; Thurbin, Simon; Sharma, Shifali; Mao, Shari; Postlethwaite, John; Evans, Casey; Glover, Sheila; Carrington, Clara
Cc: Beck, Sally; Wilson, Shona; Considine, Keith; Trevino, Susan; Ayala, Susie; Apollo, Beth
Subject: DPR reporting for 22nd trading due today - request by Fallon

Fallon has requested a DPR be prepared 2X a week for positions that we are executing on (active/live positions only, no terminations or deals we are not executing on).  We have put together the shell of how this DPR will look.  To start this process we are planning to present to him positions (column E) and PRM value (column X) as of 1/23.  To do this, we have laid out the following steps:

- we need to get the PRM values directly from you (column X)
- we will run the benchmarks and need to work with you to ensure you are happy with the benchmark numbers we have pulled from RMS (the exception is gas, we need the gas risk group to provide the gas bench to us)
- we need all of then exceptions/qualifications to your numbers
- we will need the other information in the schedule to be reported to us starting next week, but not for this exercise

Please confirm to me/Shona that you can get us this info by 230 pm today.

Lastly, I am attaching the unofficialized book list as these books will not make it into the benchmarks and need you to confirm that there are no 3rd party positions in these books.

Thanks in advance

Chris Abel
Manager, Risk Controls
Global Risk Operations
chris.abel@enron.com <mailto:chris.abel@enron.com>
713.853.3102


Attached is the revised letter agreement.


Hi Ed,

I can't find (or recall) that I received the subsequent email referenced in
this email.  Can you direct me to the right place?  I looked under
Administrator and Legal Net X, and all my emails from 3/8.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/12/2001 01:46
PM ---------------------------
From: Ed B Hearn III@ECT on 03/08/2001 04:26 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dean Russell/SF/ECT@ECT, Bill
Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT,
pthompson@akllp.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, michael.barnas@ps.ge.com,
kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Secure Website for Enron/GE Turbine Contract Negotiation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This afternoon you will receive a Logon ID and Password to a secure website
known as LegalNetEx ("LNX").   LNX will provide the Enron/GE Turbine Contract

Team with a centralized location for the efficient and organized exchange of
contract drafts and revision proposals.  It works like this:

1.  When you log on to LNX, a set of instructions will lead you to the most
recent version of the contract.   To review and revise the contract you will

download the document onto your PC or LAN.

2. Consistent with normal drafting, you will need to save your revised
version of the contract on your system, under a new name.

3. When you are ready to provide your revised version of the contract to the
rest of the team, you will upload the your document onto LNX.  Peter Thompson
will
receive an automatic email from LNX each time a team member uploads a revised
document.

4.  When Peter  has incorporated the various revisions proposed by the team,
he will upload the resulting revision cycle on LNX.    Each team member will

receive an automatic email notification when Peter uploads the latest and
greatest version of the contract.

Additionally, you will not have to redline your document for the group, LNX
will handle redlining for us, it's automatic, too.

If you have questions or difficulties with LNX, please contact Matt
Troncelliti of LegalNetEx using either matt@internetex.com or 610/617-1753.

For nontechnical questions or comments, please feel free to contact me, Ed
Hearn, using either ed.b.hearn.iii@enron.com or 713/853-1592.

Thank you,
Ed


Fred,

For the record, I don't agree with your legal interpretation of the "impeded"
issue, nor do I agree with any rumor mill which opines as to what contributed
to the demise of the VEPCO project.

It is unfortunate (and in fact disturbing) if people who didn't have first
hand knowledge of the facts (and who lacked an understanding of  the legal
issues involved) have downplayed our position with SW.

Kay


Jeff -- Thanks for the heads up.  I'll see what's cooking internally and see if we can get some help.  Two summers down one to go.  Joe


Jim,

What is you middle name if you don't mind me asking you. I need it to fill out the recommendation letter

Monika

-----Original Message-----
From: Nielsen, James - COB [mailto:NielsenJ@bus.orst.edu]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: RE: Fax the recommendation letters

The fax number here is 541-737-4890.

-----Original Message-----
From: Causholli, Monika [mailto:Monika.Causholli@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:41 AM
To: Nielsen, James - COB
Subject: Fax the recommendation letters

Jim,

I was thinking that since I do not have enough time to prepare the appplication process, it would be a good idea for me to fax the recommendation letter forms to you first so you know what to expect and maybe start writing. In the meantime, I will mail those forms as well as envelopes because you have to retunrn those to me. The envelopes would have to be signed across the seal.
There will be a total of four schools that I am applying to.
   1- Yale
   2- Boston College
   3- University of Massachusetts
   4- Bocconi University (Italy)

Thanks,
Monika

-----Original Message-----
From: Nielsen, James - COB [mailto:NielsenJ@bus.orst.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:24 PM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: RE: Information from University of Colorado

Hi -

I would contact the other finance guys here. Who knows, they may have some great leads. As far as the letter is concerned, I would be happy to do it. Generally, however, each grad school has a specific recommendation form that they want references to fill out. So let me know after you get the required info from the schools. Typically, students just send it to me as I will probably have to submit it directly to the grad school people as they generally want confidential letters.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Causholli, Monika [mailto:Monika.Causholli@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:37 AM
To: Nielsen, James - COB
Subject: RE: Information from University of Colorado

Jim,

I did write to Eric Hughson about the PhD program and I am waiting for his response.
In the meantime can you write me a recommendation letter. I know you don't like to do this but if you would it would be great. I am planning to apply to about 3-4 schools for now. I will mail the paperwork to you on Monday.
Also, should I contact the other finance professors at OSU trying to see what they can help me with?
Thanks for all your help. I will keep you posted.

Monika

-----Original Message-----
From: Nielsen, James - COB [mailto:NielsenJ@bus.orst.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:29 PM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: FW: Information from University of Colorado

Hi Again Monika -

Here is what I heard from my former professor. If I were you, I would contact Eric Hughson about CU's PhD program in Finance. It is worth a try.

I will contact you if I hear about other opportunities either for graduate study or employment opportunities. Keep me posted.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Melicher [mailto:Ronald.Melicher@Colorado.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Nielsen, James - COB
Subject: RE: Hello Old Friend

Hi Jim,
It has been a long time between communications.  We no longer offer an MS in Finance (however, I believe the Denver Campus does).  We admit only one or two new students in the Finance PhD Program each year--thus it is very competitive.  Our Finance PhD Program coordinator is Eric Hughson and he could be contacted at Eric.Hughson@Colorado.EDU <mailto:Eric.Hughson@Colorado.EDU>.  Unfortunately, I don't have any specific recommendations.
Ron
PS--I also still like the teaching part of the academic life and probably won't be retiring for another few years.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nielsen, James - COB [mailto:NielsenJ@bus.orst.edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:49 PM
To: Ronald.Melicher@Colorado.EDU
Subject: Hello Old Friend

Hi Ron -

It certainly has been a long time since we have communicated. I am glad to see that you have not yet retired and either have I. Moreover, I don't have any plans to do so in the immediate future as this job is so much fun.

The reason I am writing is that a former student of mine from Albania who works for Enron has been thinking for some time that she would like to go back to school and get a Master's Degree in Finance or PhD. Being a foreign student she needs to get some sort of scholarship or assistantship. She graduated from OSU a year or so ago and has been working at Enron since that time. Given what is happening at Enron, I am not surprised that she has decided to go back for a graduate degree.

Our College of Business does not have any graduate student assistantships and we also don't offer a master degree in finance or PhD.  Monika is without a doubt one of the sharpest students I have had in recent years. She is incredibly bright and works very hard.

Does CU still offer the masters degree in finance and still offer student assistantships. If I recall, George Carvel was working on a MS in Finance and had an assistantship under Maurice Unger when I was going to CU. If so, can I give Monika your name and have her contact and perhaps forward her resume to you. Or can you put her in touch with the right person at CU?

If CU does not have anything available do you know of a few schools who might so that I can pass the information on to Monika?

Thanks for any help you can provide.

Best regards,

Jim

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


With respect to the ECT Merchant Investments Corp. and ENA contract and the
St. Mary's Production, LLC and ENA contract (Gary Bryan's "Preston" deal),
Melissa Graves and I will assume responsibility for having our records and
deals properly updated.  We would also be happy to perform the same task for
the Entrada/Crescendo contracts if you wish.

In any event, we need copies of the conveyancing documents for at least the
"Preston" deal and, if you wish us to update the Entrada/Cresendo deal also,
the conveyancing documents for that deal too.

George x3-6992

Teresa G Bushman
12/25/2000 09:13 PM
To: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesus
Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: VPP's get syndicated

I don't know the answer to that.  Does someone else?

Teresa

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

	Joan Quick
	12/24/00 04:35 PM

		 To: Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jesus Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: VPP's get syndicated

When the existing VPP's get syndicated into Brazos later this week, then they
will be between Brazos [not Entrada] and Crescendo, and Brazos [not ECT
Merchant...] and St. Mary's, who is the person responsible for making sure
that the ENA contracts group makes the name change [assignment], and that
everything in ENA's internal system - Sitara gets changed accordingly?  And
also to make sure that these deals do not get duplicated?

thanks


Christopher -- Re-sending this memo.  Received an error message, so not sure
if first memo got through to you.  -- David

---------------------- Forwarded by David L Fairley/HOU/ECT on 08/20/99 01:14
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  David L Fairley                           08/20/99 01:12 PM

To: Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: City of Lakeland ("Lakeland") Credit Reserve

Christopher -- It was my understanding that Structuring had responded to your
questions early in the week.  Apparently, your requests were not satisfied,
so we do need to get together.  Are there any other questions besides those
from earlier?  Do you have the latest model from Structuring, contracts from
Legal, and term sheet from Origination?  Please let me know what else you
need. -- David

To: David L Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Evan
Betzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: City of Lakeland ("Lakeland") Credit Reserve

David and Janet, I am re-sending this e-mail that outlines RAC's view of the
transaction, follow-up needed through the drafting of the documentation and
RAC's required involvement, and the credit reserve tied to the value based on
the latest transaction value and structure RAC has seen.  The
"Comments/Questions" section of the attached e-mail outlines RAC's open
issues, however, we have provided the appropriate credit reserve based on the
value that we understand will be marked-to-market.  As the deal evolves and
the value tied to the transaction changes so will RAC's valuation and credit
reserve.  It is very important that we are copied on the documentation
supporting the transaction so that we can understand the intricacies of the
deal as well as Enron's obligations and remedies.  I have advised Dan Hyvle
of RAC's need to be copied on the documentation.  If someone else in legal is
running with this transaction during Dan's absence please let me know.

I have scheduled a meeting at 5:00 PM, in Bill Bradford's office to discuss
the content of the attached e-mail and any changes in the valuation of the
transaction.

Christopher
Manager, RAC Ext. 33565

	From:  Christopher Smith                           08/13/99 07:27 AM

To: David L Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Evan Betzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: City of Lakeland ("Lakeland") Credit Reserve

Dave and Bill, I wanted to touch base with both of you on the status of my
analysis for the Lakeland transaction.  I have been working very closely with
Evan Betzer (ext. 34399) of the Structuring group as it relates to: (i) the
value of the transaction and the key assumptions thereof: (ii) valuing the
transaction in accordance with ECT's proposal to Lakeland versus valuing the
transaction as though ECT only holds 50% of the position with the other 50%
held by Sonat; and (iii) pondering determining if the transportation "Max
Rate" used to value a portion of ECT's transportation obligation to Lakeland
is a fixed rate or a variable rate - the Structuring Group's model assumes
that the Max Rate is fixed for the 15 year term, and the delta between the
transport curve and the Max Rate multiplied by the associated transportation
volumes is the primary source of value of the Lakeland transaction; and (iv)
determining why we would not value all transport volumes in a like manner as
(iii) above.

Separately, a considerable portion of the value tied to this transaction is
tied to an "Accelerated Payment" feature, i.e.: gas payments are made on the
20th of the delivery month versus the standard payment date of 25th of the
following month whereas transport payments are made on the 10th of the
delivery month versus the standard payment date of the 25th of the following
month.  I have not placed any value on this portion of the deal and thus no
credit reserve has been assigned to this portion of the deal.

Valuation: I have valued the Lakeland transaction at approximately $3.4MM
(in-line with the Structuring group's valuation for the like scenario) with
an associated credit reserve of $237M.  This valuation is based on the
following key assumptions.

ECT is the Seller and no obligations are assumed by Sonat - the purpose of
this approach is to value the transaction in accordance with the term sheet
in front of Lakeland.
Lakeland will pay ECT Index minus $0.06/MMBtu on approximately 157,232,934
MMBtu (45%) of the Firm MaxDQ - plus $0.0168/MMBtu paid to the desk, and
Index minus $0.09/MMBtu on 192,971,190 MMBtu (55%) of the Firm MaxDQ - plus
$0.0142/MMBtu paid to the desk.  The total PV loss tied to this index minus
sale, on the Firm MaxDQ, is approximately $17.4MM.  FYI, I have included this
associated monthly loss to ECT as an annuity in the credit reserve valuation
process.
Transport is valued using the "Transport" curve (mid-market price of
$0.2177), provided in the Structuring group's model against an assumed Max
Rate of $0.75/MMBtu on real volumes of 68,908,381 MMBtu.  Based on the
aforementioned, the AA value of transport is approximately $20.8MM.

Comments/Questions:
I need to obtain the appropriate forward volatilities for the transport
curve.  I am temporarily using NYMEX vols.
I need to better understand why we are assigning value to some of the
transport and not all of ECT's transport obligation.  In that light, I need
to clarify what ECT's remedies and obligations are, as it relates to the
transport that is being assigned to ECT from Lakeland, in a Lakeland default
scenario.  The same questions surround the additional firm transport that is
being purchased by ECT to support Lakeland's remaining Firm MaxDQ gas volumes
(approximately 124 Bcf).
Has an agreement with Sonat been drafted that affords them the opportunity to
fulfil a portion of ECT's obligations under its proposal to Lakeland?  If so,
this transaction may need to be valued separately and based on such
agreement's respective terms.
Lastly, based on both the Structuring group's model and my analysis it would
appear that the value of the Lakeland transaction resides with the desk.  The
Origination group's value is tied to the value associated with its share of
the Accelerated Payment feature of the transaction which RAC has not included
in its valuation.


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEPENO>
To: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com
Date: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:18:36 GMT
Subject:

Your message has been relayed
to the following recipient(s):

jls@fullenweider.com
Message relayed

The message was successfully delivered to 1 recipient(s)
at domain fullenweider.com.

 - C.DTF
 - C.DTF


Please read the attached memo from Jim Steffes.


Phillip,

FYI: I have a short dentist appt at 9:30 today downtown . . . so I will probably be gone for about 45 minutes or so.  Just wanted to let you know.

Thanks,
Melissa


Other than coming down to entertain me there's really nothing you can do.  Go
Home and get some sleep so you can drive tomorrow!!

I'll call you later.
Robin

Gabriel Monroy
11/22/2000 02:48 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Go home

Hey,

I can go home now !!!! Everybody is getting ready to leave here !    Let's
go!   he he.
Well, let me know if you need to do anything before we leave tomorrow.  I can
actually help you since I am pretty much done. Well, there is always
something.

Gabriel


Wanda Curry had call with SCE Thursday afternoon on PX credit calculations.
They will provide some more breakout of data to further explain things -
gross PX credits (calculated on interim basis, post 1/19 using embedded gen,
Qfs, ISO costs) before reduction to reflect new PE methodology.  During the
call, Wanda became aware that SCE's proposed new method is a backdoor way to
limit the PX credit to embedded cost of generation.   This is why we
protested the Advice Letter.  It's just up to the PUC now to resolve the
issue.


fyi
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James, Terrie
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 2:47 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth; Whalley, Greg; Frevert, Mark
Cc:	Williamson, Joannie; Olson, Cindy; Kean, Steven J.; Tilney, Elizabeth; Clark, Mary; Nadasky, Marge
Subject:	Rescheduled -- Management Conference

Ken, Greg and Mark,

I wanted to provide you a suggested agenda for the rescheduled Management Conference.  After working with Joannie Williamson to coordinate open dates on your calendars with hotel availability, here is what we are proposing:

Location:   Westin La Cantera Resort, San Antonio (The Woodlands still will not have enough rooms to hold our group in February.  We are concerned that if we don't have people committed to stay over, especially on a weekend, we risk weak participation.  Also, by rebooking with the Starwood property, we hope to potentially recoup some of the loss incurred by canceling our November date and maintain a positive relationship with the company.)

Dates:   Friday, February 22 and Saturday, February 23 (We received feedback that employees may not appreciate being asked to sacrifice a weekend right now.  However, these are the dates that the hotel is available.  Available dates the previous week would interfere with Valentines Day and coincide with the peak of the Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City.)

Agenda:

DAY 1		Friday, February 22

2pm - 5pm	Registration

6pm - 9pm	Reception and Chairman's Dinner
		Speaker:  General Norman Schwarzkopf  (The General is currently available on this date, but has not accepted the engagement.  I feel that, if we can 		reschedule him, he would be a significant draw to ensure people arrive in time for the evening activities.)

DAY 2		Saturday, February 23

8am - 2pm	Business Agenda  (I will keep Ken and the brief business unit presentations/panel on the agenda.  I also hope to reschedule Gary Hamel.  Otherwise, I will		remain flexible on the agenda.)

2pm		Meeting Adjourns

		No planned activities  (The activities are perceived as an unnecessary extravagance at this time.)

We'd like to issue a memo about postponing the Management Conference to invitees as soon as possible.  While details on the agenda can be resolved later, please let me know if you are comfortable with the dates and location so we can include that information in the memo.

Regards,
Terrie James
ext. 3-7727