Hi - I just wanted to give you a quick run down on the meeting yesterday.
Three people spoke at the meeting - Jeff McMahon, Louise and Philippe.  There
was a lot of attention given to EnronOnline and it's success.  Greg Whalley
spoke via satellite from London.  The basic theme was what it is going to
take to survive in today's fast moving markets and how we are going to get
there, and that in five years all businesses will be Internet companies or
not companies at all.....

Greg spoke briefly about what we were going to do to upgrade and expand
existing platforms and the fact that no other player in the industry can do
this but us because of our financial capabilities, reputation, and IT
resources.

Louise went over statistics, products offered, etc. on EnronOnline.

Philippe discussed all the IT projects in the works - the key one for ENA was
enhancement of deal capture, valuation and settlements (no surprises
there!).  One other common theme was streamlining our current systems.   He
also confirmed the fact that we were moving from Lotus Notes to Exchange, and
discussed the fact that we were running out of space in the building for our
equipment (and the ability to keep the room cool) so they were looking to
Ardmore for this.

Jeff M. stated that we were looking for opportunities to capitalize on
inefficiencies in the market, and get into other industries (e.g. MG Metals
in Europe).  He also stated that Enron was going to Venture Capitalists for
financial support and backing.  Of course, this means that Enron will have to
give up some control, but it leads to increased deal flow, market share and
new ideas....  He said the initial backing will be in the neighborhoods of
$1B - most likely in Q3.

I tried to capture the main topics, let me know if you have any questions!

Sheri


Gentlemen:

Enron is exploring the possibility of becoming involved in a research
endeavor called the New Economy Value Research Lab. The Lab is the result of
a joint effort between MIT's Sloan School of Management and Arthur Andersen
(AA). Its purpose is to develop "quantitative valuations of the intangible
assets Wall Street finds increasingly important in the New Economy" (Business
Week, 2/7/00). Clearly, as Enron continues to shift from a hard asset to
intangible asset based organization, the question of "how to" accurately and
appropriate measure and value our intangible assets is becoming increasingly
important.

Last week, Steve Kean, Vince Kaminski, Marie Hejka, and myself met with a
team from AA, the Deputy Dean of the Sloan School, and MIT's lead
accounting/finance professor to discuss the intent of the Lab, expected
outcomes, and how Enron may be involved. Post that meeting, the decision was
made to continue to explore participation in the Lab. Enron now needs to 1)
define our corporate measurement and valuation process needs, and 2) identify
value attributes important to Enron and the industries in which we operate.
Once defined, a follow up meeting will be held with MIT and next steps will
be determined.

Your expertise and assistance could significantly impact the inputs and
outcomes of these next steps. Please schedule time on Tuesday August 1 from
2:00 to 3:30 to attend the next meeting, during which we will begin to
identify needs and define value attributes. Location will be EB 49c4. Please
notify me if you are unable to attend.

Lastly, to assist with preparation for this meeting, I am attaching notes
from a recently published book entitled  Cracking the Value Code: How
Businesses Are Creating Wealth in the New Economy (May 2000, Boulton, Libert,
Samek - Arthur Andersen).

Should you like more information on the Lab, previous meeting, book or other,
please feel free to contact me.

I look forward to meeting you.
Regards,
Amy Oberg


Attached is the Midland Weekly Report - Thanks to Sherry Scarberry for typing the report this week.

Thanks

Adel


In furtherance of our discussions of last week, please find attached a copy
of the following:

1.  a draft request for collateral; and
2. a draft amendment to the Master Physical Agreement with Petro-Canada Oil
and Gas.

Please be advised that Tana Jones is preparing the amendment to the ISDA
Agreement with Petro-Canada and is to forward the document to me via e-mail.
Once you have had an opportunity to review the attached documents, please
give me a call.  I expect to be in the office throughout this week.

Regards,

Mark Powell (6708)

Barry Tycholiz
06/28/2000 08:32 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Petro-Canada Amendments to Master Firm and Master Swap

Further to my conversation with some of you, please consider this note as a
action item to raise the applicable paper regarding both PCOG and PC.

I have discussed credit related matters with Heather Scott from PC, and she
is ok with the amendments that I have proposed.  She understands where ECC is
coming from and is hopeful that before we ask PC for a LC we ensure that the
credit allocations with PC are set up properly. ( that's step 1).  Then ECC
can make the proper determination on exposures.  Prior to a LC request, PC
would like to work on commercial initiatives if possible.

1) Peter/Mark can we raise the letters that will amend the agreements as
required?
2) Change collateral Threshold on the Master Firm between PCOG and ECC from
25,000,000 US$ to  $ 45,000,000 US $.
3) Reduce collateral Threshold on Master Swap between PC and ECC from $
25,000,000 US$ to $ 5,000,000 US$.
4) Mark, can you please review the corporate structure of PCHC ( US)
regarding either Limited tor General Partnership and the issue related to the
Guarentee that we have from PC. ( have they capped their liability to us or
is this a redundant provision?).

Heather Scott will be away on holidays from today until the 18th of July. Can
we please have this paper waiting for her when she get's back.

Any questions regarding this note, call me.  Barry


You guys should enjoy this--especially the last one.   Reed, you never called
back you wimpy Pantani butt pirate.  I've got a big case settling and am more
likely going to have a shot at blasting out for a couple days of fishing.
Let me know whether fishing is worth a shit out there.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/21/2000
09:51 AM ---------------------------

"Baird, Kate" <Kbaird@FirstRate.com> on 07/19/2000 10:09:35 AM
To: "Drew Fossum [Drew_Fossum@enron.com] (E-mail)" <Drew_Fossum@enron.com>,
"Steve Egert (E-mail)" <Egert_Steve@emc.com>, "Oyola, Jennie"
<JOyola@FirstRate.com>, "Graham, Curt" <CGraham@FirstRate.com>, "Stone, Jud"
<JStone@FirstRate.com>
cc:

Subject: FW:

Keep reading, some of these are really  funny!?And the last one is great!

?
----- Original Message -----
Subject: Fw:

> These are things people actually said in  court, word for word, taken
> down and now published by court reporters  who had the torment of
> staying calm while these exchanges were actually  taking place:
>
>  --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Q:  What is your date of birth?
> A: July fifteenth.
> Q: What  year?
> A: Every year.
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: What  gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
> A: Gucci sweats and  Reeboks.
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: This  myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
> A: Yes.
> Q:  And in what ways does it affect your memory?
> A: I forget.
> Q: You  forget. Can you give us an example of something that you've
>  forgotten?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: How  old is your son, the one living with you?
> A: Thirty-eight or  thirty-five, I can't remember which.
> Q: How long has he lived with  you?
> A: Forty-five years.
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: What  was the first thing your husband said to you when he woke
> that  morning?
> A: He said, "Where am I, Cathy?"
> Q: And why did that  upset you?
> A: My name is Susan.
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: And  where was the location of the accident?
> A: Approximately milepost  499.
> Q: And where is milepost 499?
> A: Probably between milepost  498 and 500.
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: Sir,  what is your IQ?
> A: Well, I can see pretty well, I think.
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>  Q: Did you blow your horn or anything?
> A: After the accident?
> Q:  Before the accident.
> A: Sure, I played for ten years. I even went to  school for it.
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: Do  you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo or
> the  occult?
> A: We both do.
> Q: Voodoo?
> A: We do.
> Q:  You do?
> A: Yes, voodoo.
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q:  Trooper, when you stopped the defendant, were your red and blue
> lights  flashing?
> A: Yes.
> Q: Did the defendant say anything when she got  out of her car?
> A: Yes, sir.
> Q: What did she say?
> A:  What disco am I at?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: Now  doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he
> doesn't  know about it until the next morning?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: The  youngest son, the twenty-year old, how old is he?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: Were  you present when your picture was taken?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: So  the date of conception (of the baby) was August eighth?
> A: Yes.
>  Q: And what were you doing at that time?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: She  had three children, right?
> A: Yes.
> Q: How many were  boys?
> A: None.
> Q: Were there any girls?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: You say  the stairs went down to the basement?
> A: Yes.
> Q: And these  stairs, did they go up also?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: How  was your first marriage terminated?
> A: By death.
> Q: And by whose  death was it terminated?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: Can  you describe the individual?
> A: He was about medium height and had a  beard.
> Q: Was this a male, or a female?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: Is  your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition
> notice which  I sent to your attorney?
> A: No, this is how I dress when I go to  work.
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q:  Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?
> A: All my  autopsies are performed on dead people.
>
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: All  your responses must be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
> A:  Oral.
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: Do  you recall the time that you examined the body?
> A: The autopsy started  around 8:30 p.m.
> Q: And Mr. Dennington was dead at the time?
> A:  No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an
>  autopsy.
>
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q: Are  you qualified to give a urine sample?
>
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Q:  Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a
>  pulse?
> A: No.
> Q: Did you check for blood pressure?
> A:  No.
> Q: Did you check for breathing?
> A: No.
> Q: So, then  it is possible that the patient was alive when you began
> the  autopsy?
> A: No.
> Q: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
> A:  Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
> Q: But could the  patient have still been alive nevertheless?
> A: Yes, it is possible that  he could have been alive and practicing
> law  somewhere.


Hello! Rick,
;
Today Dr. Jaime Alatorre told me about an Energy Convention in Mexico, where
Enron is going to be a Gold sponsor. After this I spoke by telephone with
Carlos Camacho who is Director of CRG, the company that;is;organizing this
event.
;
Attached below please find the contract for the sponsorship. The contract is
in Spanish,;if you;like I could get it;translated. Carlos has told me that
the contract;should;be signed;in Spanish. You will sign two contracts one for
you and the other;for CRG Consultores.
;
In this contract the information that is missing from;Enron is:
;
- Principal address, where they can send notifications
- The name of the person, who;will sign this contract;
- Legal representative, in their case,;Jose Diego Palafox,;who is their legal
representative, is going to sign the contract on behalf of CRG Consultores.
- Our legal name (Enron Corp or just Enron ?)
;
Carlos is preparing a;file for you with the sponsorship contract, brochures
and information related to the event, he will send this information to you.
;
Regards,
;
Kikumi
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Camacho [mailto:ccd_crg@alo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 2:43 PM
To: Kishigami, Kikumi
Subject: Re: Datos Enron

Lic. Kishigami:

Por instrucciones del Lic. Carlos Camacho D?valos, le env?o el
borrador del Contrato de Patrocinio Oro y Participaci?n para el
Congreso "Sector El,ctrico Mexicano: Cambio y Desarrollo" para sus
comentarios y modificaciones.

Agradeciendo sus atenciones, reciba un cordial saludo.

ATENTAMENTE

Teresa G?mez
Gerente de Administraci?n
CRG Consultores, S.C.

Carlos Camacho D?valos
Socio Director
CRG Consultores, S.C.

World Advisory Today, S.A. de C.V.
Direcci?n de Operaciones

http://www.alo.com
Enviado por Correo Alo


just send it out to the affected parties.

thxs
dave


What better time to start thinking about the winter holidays than on
Halloween?!

Just a reminder that our happy little office will be hosting a Holiday Party
& Benefit Auction on Saturday, Dec. 2, beginning at 6 p.m. and lasting until
the wee hours of the morning. We hope that everyone will be able to attend,
which is why we're reminding you while the smell of pumpkin-insides and candy
corn is still fresh in the air.

We will be holding a benefit raffle and auction again this year, and all
proceeds will once again be matched by Enron Corp. Donations will be divided
between Portland's Raphael House, a shelter for battered women and their
children, and the Court-Appointed Special Advocates, a group that assists
foster children and at-risk youth throughout the court process.

But who said charity couldn't be a hoot? There will be a pangea of prizes and
a gaggle of goods for everyone (think Blazer tickets and autographed Blazer
basketballs!). And a BAND! A swing band! It will prove to be the most
fantastic Holiday Party this office has ever had....


is that supposed to be funny?


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	PRC---Smoothing - Hyatt Regency IAH Suite 318 (3rd flr) Lunch 11:30

Date:		7/5/2000
Time:		8:30 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Detailed Description:


713-237-5096 press 0 for assistant


Here is the memo from Brazos' counsel.

----- Original Message -----
From: <JKeefe@PattonBoggs.com>
To: <sdtick@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 10:16 AM
Subject: Final Memorandum Responding to Tenaska Issues

>
>
> (MEMO/STEVE TICK) (See attached file: 2t@j04!.DOC)
>
> This e-mail message contains confidential, privileged information intended
> solely for the addressee. Please do not read, copy, or disseminate it
unless you
> are  the  addressee.  If  you have received it in error, please call us
> (collect) at  (202) 457-6000 and ask to speak with the message sender.
Also,
> we  would appreciate your forwarding the message back to us and deleting
it from
> your system. Thank you.
>
> To learn more about our firm, please visit our website at
> http://www.pattonboggs.com.
>

 - 2t@j04!.DOC


Mark;

I saw your note replying to my earlier e-mail today re. ISDA (thanks).  Although it is Enron Brazil's goal to be able to enter into these type of energy commodities derivatives transactions in the future, it seems to me that there are several tax implications (still to be resolved and/or optimized) which prevent us from participating in this market.

Considering your and Brent's energy commodity derivatives experience in the US, do you think you could assist me to put together this "Wish List" for ISDA to discuss with the Brazilian authorities ?

Tks,

Sami

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/SA/Enron on 09/28/2001 07:42 PM ---------------------------

Pedro Martinez <PMARTINEZ@isda.org> on 09/28/2001 05:43:09 PM
To:	"'ravi.tennekoon@uk.abnamro.com'" <ravi.tennekoon@uk.abnamro.com>, "'herbert.perez@bankofamerica.com'" <herbert.perez@bankofamerica.com>, "'fmatti@bci.it'" <fmatti@bci.it>, "'marcio.bonfiglioli@bankofamerica.com'"	 <marcio.bonfiglioli@bankofamerica.com>, "'john.p.emert@bofasecurities.com'" <john.p.emert@bofasecurities.com>, "'amaury.f.junior@bankofamerica.com'" <amaury.f.junior@bankofamerica.com>, "'marta.alves@itau.com.br'" <marta.alves@itau.com.br>, "'lavinia.junqueira@itau.com.br'" <lavinia.junqueira@itau.com.br>, "'gabriela.romano@itau.com.br'" <gabriela.romano@itau.com.br>, "'anibal.fernandez@itau.com.br'" <anibal.fernandez@itau.com.br>, "'cbussab@bsinvest.com.br'" <cbussab@bsinvest.com.br>, "'giuseppe@bsinvest.com.br'" <giuseppe@bsinvest.com.br>, "'jfrias.ny@siny.com'" <jfrias.ny@siny.com>, "'tmalamud@santander.com.br'" <tmalamud@santander.com.br>, "'rlrubin@santander.com.br'" <rlrubin@santander.com.br>, "'aozago@santander.com.br'" <aozago@santander.com.br>, "'mfontes@bbvbrasil.com.br'" <mfontes@bbvbrasil.com.br>, "'fcjacob@bnpparibasl.com.br'" <fcjacob@bnpparibasl.com.br>, "'irene.rodriguez@americas.bnpparibas.com'"	 <irene.rodriguez@americas.bnpparibas.com>, "'santiago.gonzalezpini@citi.com'" <santiago.gonzalezpini@citi.com>, "'david.posen@db.com'" <david.posen@db.com>, "'rui.alves@db.com'"	 <rui.alves@db.com>, "'sami.arap@enron.com'" <sami.arap@enron.com>, Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>, "'ricardo.salaman@gs.com'"	 <ricardo.salaman@gs.com>, "'samuel.ramos@gs.com'" <samuel.ramos@gs.com>, "'yuri.okumura@gs.com'" <yuri.okumura@gs.com>, "'leocha@us.ibm.com'"	 <leocha@us.ibm.com>, "'jimenez_emilio@jpmorgan.com'"	 <jimenez_emilio@jpmorgan.com>, "'oliveira_rogerio@jpmorgan.com'"	 <oliveira_rogerio@jpmorgan.com>, "'ggentile@lehman.com'"	 <ggentile@lehman.com>, "'cmordas@lehman.com'" <cmordas@lehman.com>, "'lbittar@exchange.ml.com'" <lbittar@exchange.ml.com>, "'mmizumot@exchange.mi.com'" <mmizumot@exchange.mi.com>, "'duane.hughes@msdw.com'" <duane.hughes@msdw.com>, "'lessa@pinheironeto.com.br'" <lessa@pinheironeto.com.br>, "'faprado@pinheironeto.com.br'" <faprado@pinheironeto.com.br>, "'ruth.laslo@ubsw.com'" <ruth.laslo@ubsw.com>
cc:	Ruth Ainslie <RAinslie@isda.org>, Diane Genova	 <genova_diane@jpmorgan.com>, Scott Marra <SMARRA@isda.org>, Lakeisha Johnson <LJohnson@isda.org>, Kimberly Summe <KSumme@isda.org>

Subject:	Next Brazilian Subcommittee meeting

ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
600 Fifth Avenue
Rockefeller Center - 27th floor
New York, NY 10020
Phone: (212) 332-1200
Facsimilie: (212) 332-1212
Website: www.isda.org <http://www.isda.org>

MEMO TO:		Latin American Committee

FROM:			Pedro D. Martinez

DATE:			September 28, 2001

RE:			Next Brazilian Subcommittee Meeting

Dear All,

ISDA would like to schedule a Brazilian Subcommittee Meeting next week. The
proposed dates are the following: October, 3rd, 4th or 5th at 11:00 am New
York time at ISDA. Please choose the date that is more convenient so that we
can make appropriate arrangements. As usual, we will provide a call in
number for people that are traveling or located abroad.

ISDA is considering a visit to Brazil of several days in order to hold
meetings with the Central Bank as well as other regulators - NMC, e.g.,
market players, netting legislation contacts, lawyers working on master
agreement development, and others in order to further the agenda of the
Brazilian Subcommittee and to be able to prepare for the conference planned
for Brazil next year.

In preparation for our subcommittee meeting ISDA would like to obtain from
your institution a list ("Wish List") of local OTC derivatives market issues
for ISDA to address as well as suggestions for meetings and organizations
with which ISDA might meet to address these issues. This "Wish List" will be
of enormous help to ISDA for purposes of having an adequate and focused
agenda for planning visits with a number of Brazilian institutions and
authorities.

Please reply R.S.V.P. by email to Scott Marra (smarra@isda.org) if you would
like to attend.

If you have additional suggestions in terms of the topics to be included in
our agenda please do not hesitate to contact me.

Best Regards,

Pedro Martinez - Delgado
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
600 Fifth Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY 10020-2302
Direct: (212) 332-1207
Fax: (212) 332-1212
Email: pmartinez@isda.org


203-850-2126

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Muller, Mark S.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:54 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	RE:

do you have a #...he called when  i was in a meeting

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Muller, Mark S.
Subject:

Mark

Todd Esse of Sempra is in the building and wanting to buy the metals business.  I told him to call you.


plz call asap re: mary hain.  thanks, jeff  415.782.7822


| notifications                                                            |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Carswell, Dwayne added to Team Chick's rosters, and Dudley, Rickey dropped.
If you have a cell phone or pager, you can get this information even sooner! Go to your league's web site and click "Options, Notifications" on the main toolbar to have notifications sent to your pager or phone, via text messaging.

Win a VIP Vegas Vacation! OR Win $600 CASH!
http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffn1011v.cgi
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|        Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.       |
|   Your site is always at http://football.fantasy.sportsline.com/getbad   |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

FB10SP


It's not too late to train for the MS(180), regardless of what some people
have told you - and if you're struggling with the "whole" reality of actually
getting all the way to Austin - just think of it as 10 miles at a time.  That
will get you there.  Another tool is visualizing - every night before you go
to sleep, shut your eyes and visualize yourself on your little bike, going
across the map from Houston to Austin - over and over and over.  It works!
I've done it!

If virtual training won't be enough, get out this weekend on your bike - and
here's some great ideas for you.  Of course, we have the Tour deCypress, but
don't try to keep up with CHARLA REESE - she got a brand new bike and she is
SMOKIN.'   This is a great ride - the first 40 miles is wonderfully scenic,
and that last 40 miles is great resistance training in the wind.

Sunday  - April 2 - 7:30 AM - 50, 62 or 85 miles
Cypress Spring High School - FM 529 and Fry Road
Sponsor: Northwest Cyclery - 713-622-1240

Saturday - April 1 - 8:00 AM - 32, 45 or 63 miles   (HBC ride)

Cypress-Prairie View - Flat roads through ranching and rice farming country
around Waller and Hockley.  Very little traffic.  Eat after the ride at The
Kettle at US290 & FM1960.  MEET:  29 miles NW on US-290 to Cypress-Rosehill
Road, north 2 miles to Huffmeister.  Park in HL&P's parking lot on west side
- farthest from the building.  Ride Starter:  David Dick @ 713-781-6052.

Sunday - April 2 - 8:00 AM - 40 or 62 miles

Chappell Hill - One of the prettier rides for wildflowers in the spring.  The
short route heads north on FM1155 for 7.5 miles to the stop sign at FM2193,
then heads east on FM1155 another 12 miles to Washington on the Brazos State
Park.  The long route turns left at the stop sign, travels west on FM2193 and
takes a winding route through some minor hills before ending up at the
Washington on the Brazos.  There are bathroom facilities and water/soft
drinks available at the park.  MEET:  Take Highway 290 from Houston, about 65
miles (12 miles past Hempstead) until you come to the flashing light at the
intersection of Highway 290 and FM1155.  There's a sign that says "Chappell
Hill" to the right.  Turn right on FM1155 and go about 1 mile to the center
of town.  The 2nd street on the right is "Poplar."  Take a right and go a
block or two past the church and park on the side road connecting Poplar and
Providence.

Happy Pedaling!   Amelia
       __o
     _`\<,_
    (*)/ (*)


Steve:

I have sent the amendment to the Agency Agreement to Gary Hickerson for signature on behalf of ECT Investments, Inc.  When executed, I will fax you a copy.  How do you want to handle obtaining Michael Brown's signature?  Do you want me to send the original to you and you will coordinate getting his signature, or do you want me to send it to Michael directly?  I know Michael, so I don't have a problem with sending it directly to him, or I can certainly send it to someone in Legal in London to coordinate getting his signature.  Please let me know how you want to handle this.

In addition, I made a few minor changes to the amendment.  ECT Investments' name is ECT Investments, Inc. with a comma between "Investments" and "Inc.".  Also, Gary Hickerson is President of ECT Investments rather than Managing Director, and I also added his and Michael's middle initials.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:41 PM
To: Heard, Marie
Subject: FW: EISL Agency Agreement, Amendment Proposal

Marie:  Please handle.  Thanks.
[Shackleton, Sara]
 -----Original Message-----
From: Jacobson, Stephen
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:42 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Subject: FW: EISL Agency Agreement, Amendment Proposal

Sara,

Could you fax me a copy of the signed amendment to the Agency Agreement.

Thanks,
Steve
FAX: 44 207 783 2356

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacobson, Stephen
Sent: 27 July 2001 15:48
To: Glover, Sheila; Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Juggins, Janine
Subject: RE: EISL Agency Agreement, Amendment Proposal

I have attached the proposed amendment to the Agency Agreement for your review.

Sara, subject to comments, I would appreciate it if you could also coordinate signatures.

Note that I will be out of the office until 13 August.  Please contact Janine if you have any questions/comments.

Kind regards,
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Glover, Sheila
Sent: 27 July 2001 11:24
To: Juggins, Janine; Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Jacobson, Stephen
Subject: EISL Agency Agreement, Amendment Proposal

Janine and Sara,
The attached memo supports the proprosal to amend the Agency Agreement to July 1st, 2001 for compensation purposes.
Please advise.
Sheila


Richard, thanks for this message.  John and I will also be attending.  the Cirque du Soleil is on the TUTS tour and we have season tickets.  I will find out when our date is (usually a Saturday mat.) and let you know in on the chance that the date may also work for you guys.

Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Riehm, Richard
Sent:	Wed 10/3/2001 8:21 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Cc:
Subject:	FW: Cirque du Soleil back in Houston on January 17, 2002 !

I tried sending you this message from home last night, but it fell out.

Richard Riehm
713.345.9385
Richard.Riehm@Enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: LSRiehm [mailto:LSRiehm@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:18 AM
To: Kohler, Dave @ Home; Donoho, Lindy; ENE:Watson, Kim; BR: Kohler,
Dave @ Work; Riehm, Richard
Subject: Cirque du Soleil back in Houston on January 17, 2002 !

Four years ago we went to a performance of Cirque du Soleil in tent on the
Astrodome parking lot.  Cirque du Soleil is coming back to Houston early
next year.  See the message below to get advance tickets.  We're going!

Richard & Laura Riehm
RRiehm@Houston.RR.com
----- Original Message -----
From: <dralionclub@america.cirquedusoleil.com>
To: <lsriehm@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:19 PM
Subject: Dralion opens in Houston on January 17, 2002 !

> Bonjour Laura!
>
> Cirque du SoleilT will finally be back in town! After a four-year absence,
the cast of Dralion will begin performances in Houston on January 17, 2002!
Our trademark blue-and-yellow Big Top, which can fit over 2500 people, will
be set up across from the George R. Brown Convention Center.
>
> AMEX CARD HOLDERS ADVANCE TICKETS
> As American Express is the official sponsor of the tour, its cardholders
may obtain tickets by calling 1-888-333-AMEX or online at the ticket link
below, starting October 7.
>
> DRALION CLUB MEMBERS ADVANCE TICKETS
> On October 10, we will send you an email with an exclusive link allowing
you to purchase tickets before they go on sale to the general public.
>
> GENERAL PUBLIC TICKETS
> Tickets will be available to the general public on October 14 through the
Admission Network at 1-800-678-5440 or online at the ticket link below.
>
> Ticket info: http://www.dralion.com/link.asp?u=amex_onsale&c=hous&a=60556
>
> Thank you for your interest in Cirque du Soleil and for being a member of
the Dralion Internet Club!
>
> Au revoir!
> Dralion Club staff
> Cirque du Soleil
>
> http://dralionclub.cirquedusoleil.com
> __________________________________________________________
>
> You are receiving this e-mail because you have requested to be included in
our mailing list.
>
> If, for any reason, you wish to cancel your Dralion Internet Club
membership, you can do so at:
>
http://dralionclub.cirquedusoleil.com/member/cancel.asp?email=lsriehm@housto
n.rr.com
>
> To modify your membership or update your e-mail options, go to:
http://dralionclub.cirquedusoleil.com/member/modify.asp?email=lsriehm@housto
n.rr.com
>
>
> Copyright (c) by Cirque du Soleil Inc. 2001. All rights reserved.
>
>


We have a 2500 dt/day supply from Equitable in Tenn Z4.  This deal is matched
with a term sale to FirstEnergy (deal 145648 for Jan and deal 157848 for Feb
and Mar).  This is a John Singer deal.  I have no idea what the price is on
the sale to FirstEnergy.


Williams Communications Forms Bandwidth Trading Grp
Friday, February 11, 2000 12:50 PM

	?Mail this article to a friend

	By Michael Rieke
	HOUSTON (Dow Jones)--Williams Communications Group Inc. (WCG, news, msgs) has
formed a bandwidth trading group in a step toward embracing standardized
bandwidth trading.
	The company was initially opposed to the idea of bandwidth trading as a
commodity under standard terms and conditions, so its change of opinion is
being viewed by analysts as a key step toward creating a commodity market for
telecommunications bandwidth.
	Williams Communications now wants to be a leader in setting industry
standards for bandwidth trading, Gordon Martin, president of Williams
Communications' carrier services, told Dow Jones Newswires.
	The company plans to draw on the commodity trading experience of Williams Co.
(WMB, news, msgs), Martin said. Williams Co., an energy company that owns 85%
of Williams Communications, has been trading energy commodities such as
natural gas for years.
	Williams Communications has named Sharon Crow as vice president of bandwidth
risk and optimization management. She was previously a gas trader and risk
manager with Williams Energy Services, a unit of Williams Co.
	Williams Communications has one of the largest interstate telecommunications
networks in the United States. It has recently been adding more
telecommunications fiber on both the local and international level, Martin
said.

	"This is a market that may not be at a maturity level that others would like
to think it is in terms of ability to trade," Martin said.
	That's a clear reference to Enron Corp., which proposed last year that
bandwidth be traded as a commodity under standard terms and conditions. Enron
did the first such trade in December, agreeing to buy DS-3 bandwidth from New
York and Los Angeles in monthly increments from Global Crossing Ltd. (GBLX,
news, msgs). A DS-3 fiber moves data at a rate of 45 megabits per second.
	Tom Gros, vice president of global bandwidth trading for Enron, said he
welcomes Williams to the bandwidth trading market. "This is something that
enables all of us to more effectively manage our bandwidth and offer more
innovative solutions to our clients."
	Williams Communications' Martin is quick to point out that his company has
been trading bandwidth for about 15 years.
	Those deals have typically been long term, as long as 15 to 20 years.
Traditional bandwidth deals take weeks or even months to close as companies
negotiate quantity, price, quality of service, creditworthiness, damages for
non-performance and other issues. Each new deal would start again from
scratch to negotiate those issues.
	By setting standard terms and conditions to cover such issues, industry
players can trade bandwidth more quickly and more efficiently, Crow said.
	The resulting liquidity will add flexibility to the telecommunications
industry, allowing producers and users of bandwidth to manage risk. Crow said
Williams Communications wants to take the lead in forming a
telecommunications industry committee to standardize terms for bandwidth
trading.

	That's an about-face for Williams Communications. Last May a company official
was quoted as saying that bandwidth couldn't trade as a commodity under
standard terms and conditions.
	Last December another company official spoke at a bandwidth trading
conference in New York City. He was still skeptical but softened the
company's opposition to the idea.
	Crow said Williams Communications and Williams Co. have had a committee
studying the bandwidth trading idea for more than a year.
	The group was looking at the issue from a timing perspective to see how long
it would take to become liquid. Now Williams Communications wants to help
spur that liquidity.
	Part of Williams Communications change of opinion has had to do with the
evolution of Enron's trading proposal. It was originally seen by Williams as
a proposal to trade minutes of long distance telephony minutes, said a
Williams official who didn't want to be identified. Later it evolved into
trading of high-speed data transmission bandwidth.
	It's also become evident this year that the stock market likes the bandwidth
trading idea. Before Enron did its first bandwidth trade in early December,
its share price was less than $38 a share. Then mutual funds came in to buy
large blocks of stock in December, pushing the share price above the $50
mark.
	The share price got another shot in the arm when Enron played up bandwidth
trading and its fiber-optic network at its analysts meeting Jan. 20. On Jan.
19, Enron's stock closed at $53.50 a share. On the day of the analysts
meeting, it closed at $67.38. The next day it closed at $71.63.
	The market's reaction to Enron's bandwidth position "did invigorate our
examination of the issue," said the Williams Communication official.
	"The market had shown a willingness to reward the kind of capability we
believe we had but that we hadn't brought this kind of focus to," he said.
	All the Williams Communications officials stressed that a liquid market in
bandwidth would enable the company to manage risk for itself and for its
customers.
	Under the traditional long-term deals, a bandwidth consumer has to buy enough
bandwidth to handle its maximum needs. It continues to pay for all the
bandwidth even if it's using only part of it at times. A liquid market would
allow a consumer to more closely match its bandwidth purchases with its
needs.
	Williams hopes to be pushing liquidity in certain aspects of trading, like
monthly deals instead of only multi-year deals, said a company official.
	The more bandwidth trades, the more buyers and sellers learn about the value
of individual telecommunications products, he said.
	Crow said the company is still working on an "action plan" to put together
its trading group. It could draft employees from the Williams Communications
long-term trading and deal organization group, the Williams Co. energy
commodity trading group and from outside the company.
	As for organizing an industry group to set standards for bandwidth trading,
she said that could be as simple as calling other telecommunication carriers.


Rick,
Barbara and Kerry are traveling to Missouri tommorrow to negotiate with
Ameren.  This bill which will be an industrial buy-through only (due to
complications with Constitutional Amendments in Missouri involving a
requirement for a referendum for any tax law changes).   The bill applies to
industrials greater than 1 MW in Ameren and 2 MW everywhere else.  In
speaking to EES, they want us to try and get the threshold reduced to 500kw
to 1mw.  ENA wants load following in order to sell blocks of power to large
industrials.  In addition, there are a host of other issues, including,
insufficient regulatory review for shifting generation into a genco, no code
of conduct for that genco and Illinois-styled stranded cost recovery.  Kerry
and Barbara have a tough assignment to get anything here.  We thought it
would be best to see how these negotiations go before formulating what kind
of message we would like Ken Lay to deliver if he is willing.  To make
matters worse, the industrial group has already caved on the bill.  Kerry and
Barbara, I believe are also meeting with the consumer advocates office and
the Commission staff who have not signed off on the bill.  We should know
more in the next day or two.  Nothing will happen at the legislature until
next week.
Janine

	Richard Shapiro@EES
	03/17/2001 03:11 PM

		 To: Laurie Knight/NA/Enron
		 cc: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Missouri Legislation and Request for Assistance from Ken Lay

Janine - what is status of this?

Laurie Knight
03/15/2001 10:56 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Missouri Legislation and Request for Assistance from Ken Lay

FROM: BARBARA HUETER
 KERRY STROUP

The Missouri Senate Commerce and Environment Committee is expected to pass
Sub.SB455 when it returns from spring break during the week of March 26th or
the following week.  Senate President Pro Tem Peter Kinder introduced the
bill for AmerenUE.  AmerenUE is controlling the process. We must go through
Ameren for changes - and they are not very willing to concede.

We would like to arrange for Ken Lay to call Senator Kinder to express
Enron's concerns about the bill (market structure, lack of benefits for
customers).  Our local lobbyist, Roy Cagle, could let Senator Kinder know
that Ken Lay would like to speak with him and arrange an appropriate time for
the call to take place.  It would be most helpful if the call could take
place by March 26th.

Senator Kinder graduated from the U of Missouri-Columbia in the 1970's.  He
was a member of the same fraternity as Ken Lay.  Peter also met Ken at the
Republican Convention last summer -- and seemed very excited about it.  Also,
being a Republican, Peter seems very impressed by Ken Lay's relationship with
the President.  We think this is a good opportunity for Enron to gain some
leverage over Ameren via Senator Kinder.

Kerry and I are analyzing the various drafts and suggestions for changes to
the bill.  We are working with numerous other stakeholders  -- so the actual
contents of the deal/bill are in constant flux.  We would prepare a briefing
for Mr. Lay but would wish to do so closer to the time of the call so that
Mr. Lay will have the  most up-to-date information.

In a nutshell -- the bill allows a utility to spin off generation assets to a
genco at historic net book value.  The utility would then sign a PPA with the
genco to provide for the full requirements of its captive customers as well
as eligible customers who have not chosen an alternative supplier.  Customers
over 1MW in Ameren's service territory and those over 2MW in other service
territories (munis and coops excluded) would be able to arrange buy-through
type arrangements with registered suppliers. The bill does not contain
adequate transmission access language, a code of conduct, appropriate
unbundling language nor does it address a host of other market structure
issues that are key to developing robust competition.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 08/11/99 08:40 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Dan J Bump                           07/29/99 12:14 PM

To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Petrogulf Term Sheet

G-Money:

Another term sheet for your review and comments..........

Word--

D-Rock


This email reflects today's events in Sacramento. The information provided is
subject to change because of constant flux. However it is important for us to
provide this information for feedback and to caution as to new regulations
that may affect some deals in the making .

Governor Davis, Assembly Women Susan Davis, and Senator Alpert had a press
conference.

They will introduce a rate/bill stabilization plan for SDG&E and an
expediting siting bill. There is no language as of yet.

Although there is no specific language, the following elements may be
included:

The stabilization plan will be applicable to residential and probably
commercial customers in SDG&E
The bill cap may be set at $68 for residential.
The cap will be in place until the end of 2002
There will be language on expediting siting for generation plants

Sam Wehn and Sandra McCubbin have been talking with the CEC executive
director and several legislators about the siting portion of the bill.

Any comments as to the bill cap proposal?


This will make your day!
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 01:21
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen D McIlvoy                           11/01/2000 10:26 AM

To: Barry.Belcher@PSS.boeing.com
cc: jadd202@aol.com, hghanley@aol.com, Jmcilvoy@houston.rr.com,
tshield@entergy.com, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT
Subject: Happy Halloween!

-
This one is too cute!

 - ATT19368.jpg


From the office of Mr. Mark Haedicke!

Please note the attachment.

Thank you


Got the tickets today for Faith Hill-mark your calendar for Oct 13-starts at
8:00   Tina Turner is Sunda7-Oct. 29


I think we are making great progress on the systems side.  I would like to
set a deadline of November 10th to have a plan on all North American projects
(I'm ok if fundementals groups are excluded) that is signed off on by
commercial, Sally's world, and Beth's world.  When I say signed off I mean
that I want signitures on a piece of paper that everyone is onside with the
plan for each project.  If you don't agree don't sign. If certain projects
(ie. the gas plan) are not done yet then lay out a timeframe that the plan
will be complete.  I want much more in the way of specifics about objectives
and timeframe.

Thanks for everyone's hard work on this.

John


Good Morning All,

F.Y.I......

Again we have excess on our account today with EDF Man.  When I called to confirm, Paul tells me that no money with be transfered.  Total amount of excess is $24,296,123.00.

Please call me if any questions or concerns.

Thanks!
gg


http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
Learn about SCIENTECH'S most popular competitive tools, including the
E-Commerce
and Telecommunications InfoGrids at:
http://www.consultrci.com or call Chris Vigil (505) 244-7605
*********************************************************************
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
at nspring@scientech.com or (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are
also available on our website.
*********************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 30, 2000
TNPC Wins Pennsylvania Customers, Continues to Go Green
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

TNPC, Inc., parent of The New Power Company, reported that the Pennsylvania
Public Utility Commission approved the "Competitive Default Service Agreement"
between The New Power Company and PECO Energy for almost 300,000 customers.
The PUC is expected to issue a final order on this matter in the next few
days.

ANALYSIS: As you may recall, a dispute erupted between TNPC and Green Mountain
about a month ago over this large number of customers in PECO Energy's
service territory. Under a regulatory mandate from the Pennsylvania PUC,
PECO had initiated an auction for the approximately 300,000 residential
electricity customers who had not selected a competitive energy service
provider registered within the state. This represented about 20 percent
of PECO's residential customer base. Three energy providers*TNPC, Green
Mountain and one other unidentified company*bid for the customers with
various service packages. PECO chose TNPC, which had offered a fixed discount
of 2 percent for the residential customers, because it believed the offer
was in the best interest of PECO customers.

Green Mountain contested this decision, arguing that its hydro- and natural
gas-based energy package would ultimately be "less expensive for consumers
and environmentally cleaner." Green Mountain also claimed that its proposed
offer was a full 2 percent less than PECO's shopping credit, compared to
TNPC's offer which would average about 1.83 percent below the shopping
credit. PECO's response was that Green Mountain had missed the deadline
for the auction and consequently did not present a valid offer. Over the
last month, both Green Mountain and TNPC fought hard for PECO's customers,
which was understandable as Pennsylvania represents arguably the most
successful
retail market in the United States, if not the world.

The PUC ruling clearly puts the 300,000 PECO customers into the hands of
TNPC, which of course is the product of the residential retail marketing
alliance between Enron, AOL and IBM. Securing the 300,000 residential
customers
in one swift motion is a significant achievement for TNPC and gives it
a substantial market edge over other energy service providers in the
Pennsylvania
market. The customers will be randomly selected from those that have not
shopped for an alternative supplier under the state's electric competition
program.

However, what I find most interesting about the latest development in this
case is what's happening behind the scenes of the dispute, and more
specifically
how TNPC continues to move toward a renewables perspective. I discussed
just two weeks ago (IssueAlert from Nov. 13) that TNPC's stock (NYSE: NPW)
was taking a nosedive. Keep in mind that the stock had a terrific IPO in
early October. TNPC's IPO offering of 24 million common shares was priced
at $21 per share, a surprisingly strong showing for a company that has
only been in existence since May of this year. Momentum grew as the first
day of trading saw the stock price climb to $27.  Yet, contrast that with
the current stock price of $6 3/8 (as of Nov. 30), and certainly questions
about where TNPC will go from here start to emerge. The decline in TNPC
stock seemed to start when the company reported a 3Q loss of $69.9 million,
or $2.96 per share. TNPC argued that the losses were not meaningful due
its limited operating history, but investors seemed to think otherwise.

Around the same time that TNPC's stock began to drop, the company announced
that it would be adding wind-generated energy to its package for customers
in the Philadelphia area. Under terms of a brand-new agreement, TNPC will
market wind power supplied by Community Energy from a site under development
in the mountains of northeast Pennsylvania. My reaction to this announcement
was that TNPC's addition of wind power to its portfolio was an attempt
to quell further objections from Green Mountain. Yet, TNPC's move toward
renewable energy now appears to be an attempt to save its sagging stock
price.

In another ironic twist, TNPC also announced that it is forming a partnership
with Green Mountain, which was an adversary only last month. TNPC disclosed
that it is in negotiations with Green Mountain regarding the disposition
of up to 50,000 competitive default service customers (out of the 300,000)
within PECO's territory. Reportedly, the relationship will benefit
Pennsylvania
consumers and help TNPC and Green Mountain to achieve their business goals.
In addition, TNPC claims that working with Green Mountain in this manner
is consistent with its objective of enhancing a "positive customer portfolio
value." However, considering that TNPC fought so hard to obtain all of
the 300,000 customers from PECO, it seems odd that the company would suddenly
be willing to share 50,000 of them with Green Mountain.

Certainly, Green Mountain wins from this partnership. The company gains
50,000 residential customers when it, based on the PUC's ruling, could
have ended up with nothing. The company offers three service packages in
Pennsylvania: EcoSmart, EnviroBlend and Nature's Choice, varying mixes
of hydro, natural gas and new renewables, with Nature's Choice containing
more renewables than the other two power blends. Marketing power that it
bills as "dramatically cleaner than typical Pennsylvania electricity,"
Green Mountain may be able to expand its reach in the state by attracting
energy customers who seek out environmentally clean energy.

What remains very unclear is TNPC's true motivations and the future of
the company, which made such a big splash when it began operating last
spring. Is this a classic case of an energy start-up chasing down trends
(e.g., the current high value of renewable energy stocks) in order to
rejuvenate
itself, or a true identity transformation? The questions are pertinent
as long as TNPC continues to generate losses and its stock continues to
struggle.
==============================================================
Learn more about SCIENTECH's Strategic and Competitive Intelligence products
and services at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-SI.html
==============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "delete" in the subject line.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2000
09:44 AM ---------------------------

"NW on Novell NetWare" <NovellNetWare@bdcimail.com> on 03/15/2000 08:55:09 AM
Please respond to "Novell NetWare Help" <NWReplies@bellevue.com>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Btrieve free ride ends

NETWORK WORLD FUSION FOCUS: DAVE KEARNS on NOVELL NETWARE
Today's Focus: Btrieve free ride ends
03/14/00

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

Today's Focus: Btrieve free ride ends
---------------------------------------------------------------
By Dave Kearns

NetWare has shipped with Btrieve (originally a flat-file database
system, now grown into a full-fledged relational database system) since
the days of NetWare 2 some 12 years ago. Many independent software
vendors have relied on this and constructed their NetWare applications
to use the built-in facilities Btrieve afforded.

Originally licensed from its creator, Softcraft, Novell bought Btrieve
outright in the late +80s, then sold it off 10 years later to some of
the original developers, now incorporated as Pervasive Software.
Pervasive has, essentially, retired the Btrieve name in favor of
"Pervasive SQL 2000," a true relational database system which
nevertheless still purports to support applications written to the
Btrieve 6.x specification.

A major change has been introduced in NetWare 5.1, however. There is no
longer an unlimited-use version of the database included. Novell still
uses Btrieve technology for (among other things) its installed products
database (sys:system\products.dat is the file), but NetWare 5.1
includes only a two-user license for SQL 2000  enough for the
administrator to add new products and services, but not enough for any
Btrieve-based applications the network might be running.

There is an unlimited-use version of SQL 2000 included, but it,s an
evaluation version only. It will time out after 90 days. Full-use
licenses may be purchased from Pervasive Software (or your software
vendors may provide them), but unsuspecting network administrators
could be caught off-guard when applications stop working.

For the adventurous, there is an unlimited-use version of Btrieve 6.10
included with the NetWare 5.1 distribution. But Novell admits it hasn't
tested the software with NetWare 5.1, it may not work, and  the real
killer  most current applications (such as Computer Associates
ArcServe) require Btrieve 6.15.

Check the applications you're using before doing that upgrade to
NetWare 5.1, and calculate the additional costs of obtaining the
requisite number of SQL 2000 licenses. Then, decide if that's what you
want to do, or if switching to a different application is the better
choice.

To contact Dave Kearns:
-----------------------
Dave Kearns is the Word Wrangler for Virtual Quill, a writing agency
serving the computer and networking industries. If your target
customer doesn't know your product, doesn't know its uses and doesn't
know he needs it, he's not going to buy it. From books to reviews,
marketing to manuals, VQ can help you and your business. Virtual Quill
- "words to sell by..." Find out more at: http://www.vquill.com/, or
by e-mail at mailto:info@vquill.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR RELATED LINKS -- Click here for Network World's home page:
http://www.nwfusion.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Pervasive.SQLv 2000 Product Family SDK
http://www.pervasive.com/products/psql/sdk/

Understanding Pervasive.SQL 2000, a white paper (PDF)
http://www.pervasive.com/products/psql/psql_wkgrengine/workgroupwp.pdf

Migration Guide 6 to Pervasive.SQL.doc
http://www.pervasive.com/support/technical/papers/Migration%20Guide%20-%206.15
%20to%20Pervasive.SQL.pdf

Other NetWare-related articles from Network World:

Active Directory upgrade requires strong game plan, Network World,
03/13/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/archive/2000/89629_03-13-2000.html

Microsoft exec sketches future for Win 2000, Network World, 03/13/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/archive/2000/89698_03-13-2000.html

*********************************************************
Subscription Services

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail newsletters,
go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To change your email address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to this
message.

Other Questions/Comments

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor, at:
mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Account Executive,
at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Network World Fusion is part of IDG.net, the IDG Online Network.
IT All Starts Here:
http://www.idg.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2000


Get a free cell phone today and digital PCS
Wireless Services.  You can order online and the phone
will be delivered right to your door!  This exclusive offer is being made available to you as a member of the NoTime Media Network -  subscription informaiton located below.

From AT&T and IDS Cellular.

Click the link below to get your free cell phone today!

Click Here:
http://www.idscellular.com/?wm=11271

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?notimemedia
* Enter your email address (alewis@ect.enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "notimemedia".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address alewis@ect.enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: alewis@ect.enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:15q.xbl.jx32


Kay:

I have Lee Johnson's address information and will send the Turbine Contract
now.  (I had been holding this package waiting on signature pages from
Freshfields on all of the other GE documents that GE provided directly to
Freshfields, as I was going to include these documents in the GE package as
well).

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 1:40 PM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com
Subject: Turbine contract

Carolyn,

GE is calling for the original turbine contract.  I believe I previously
provided Lee Johnson's address.  Could you send him an original?

Thanks,

Kay

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Dear Multex Investor Member:

Youre invited to an exclusive preview of Multex Investors NEW Personal
Finance Channel at http://www.multexpf.com?mktg=mitxie.  Use this new
resource of timely, reliable information and tools to help you make more
informed decisions about your personal finances on such topics as mortgages,
insurance, and retirement.

As a Multex Investor member, you can take advantage of this great new content
before its made available to the public.  Simply visit
http://www.multexpf.com?mktg=mitxie to: Ask an expert for advice on
mortgages, insurance, or retirement planning; read informative educational
articles and case studies; use the Broker Centers objective tool to find out
which brokerage firm best fits your needs, and more.

At the Personal Finance Channel, you can also learn from the strategies other
investors have tried. The channel presents real-life case studies that
examine important life events like planning for retirement distributions,
deciding whether to take a home equity loan or a home equity line of credit,
and planning for long-term care.

Were excited to bring you this new Personal Finance Channel, and we hope that
it enhances your experience on Multex Investor.

Click here:  http://www.multexpf.com?mktg=mitxie

Sincerely,

Robin Spindel
Director of Marketing
Multex.com

P.S. As always, we greatly appreciate your feedback and input.  Feel free to
contact us anytime at mail to: pfinvestor.feedback@multex.com.


Can you help ??

Sunday, June 10

Patient Betty L. 165 lbs and 170 lbs

Asheville, NC to Huntsville, AL ... afma to provide pilot
Huntsville, AL  to Natchez, MS ... afse to provide pilot
Natchez, MS to Houston _________________

Sunday, June 10

Patient Belle K. 124 lbs

Ft. Lauderdale, FL to Gainesville, Fl ... afse to provide pilot
Gainesville to Pensacola ... afse to provide pilot
Pensacola to Baton Rouge ... afse to provide pilot
Baton Rouge to Dallas ________________

Sunday, June 10

Patient Raymond C. 239 lbs and 170 lbs

Pensacola to Baton Rouge ... afse to provide pilot
Baton Rouge to Houston ________________

thank you
Beth
972 458 0700
afsc@angelflightsc.org


Here is the information requested.

Thanks,

LaShonda V. LaDay
713-853-4227


Mark,

Actually, we received the originals of the partially executed NDA's today.  I
have
countersigned for Loudcloud and placed one fully executed original to Tana's
attention in regular U.S. mail for your records.

Thanks again for your assistance on this matter.

Regards,

Kate

Mark.Greenberg@enron.com wrote:

> Kate -
>
> This should have been faxed to your offices on Friday.  If you did not
> receive it, please let me know.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mark
> Senior Counsel, EWS
> Phone:     713-345-8897
> Facsimile: 713-646-3490
> E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
>
>
>                     Kate Low
>                     <klow@loudclo        To:     Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
>                     ud.com>              cc:
>                                          Subject:     Re: NDA with Enron
Networks
>                     05/18/2001
>                     12:42 PM
>
>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Just checking on the status of the revised NDA you were going to forward
> with the
> arbitration clause included and the 3 year confidentiality period.  We are
> prepared to
> sign and fax the NDA back as soon as we receive it.  Thanks!
>
> Kate
>
> Mark.Greenberg@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Kate -
> >
> > Thanks for the comments to the NDA.  All are acceptable except -
> >
> > Paragraph 5 - Deletion of arbitration.
> >
> > Paragraph 9 - Change from two years to three years.
> >
> > Please advise if Loudcloud can live with arbitration and 2 years.  If
> not,
> > please advise why not.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Mark
> > Senior Counsel, EWS
> > Phone:     713-345-8897
> > Facsimile: 713-646-3490
> > E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
> >
> >
> >                     Kate Low
> >                     <klow@loudclo        To:     Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
> >                     ud.com>              cc:     Kathy Weber
> <kathy@loudcloud.com>
> >                                          Subject:     NDA with Enron
> Networks
> >                     05/07/2001
> >                     06:09 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > I have recently received the NDA with Enron Networks and have attached a
> > blacklined copy which indicates my requested changes.
> >
> > Please let me know if the attached is acceptable or if you have any
> > questions.  I look forward to receiving your reply shortly.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Kate Low
> > Contracts Specialist
> > 599 N. Mathilda Avenue
> > Sunnyvale, CA  94085
> > Phone:  (408) 744-7842
> > Fax:    (408) 744-7384
> >
> > (See attached file: Enron Networks 05-07-01.doc)
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                                          Name: Enron Networks
> 05-07-01.doc
> >    Enron Networks 05-07-01.doc           Type: WINWORD File
> (application/msword)
> >                                      Encoding: base64
> >                               Download Status: Not downloaded with
> message


First, congratulations to all five of you and the others on your staffs who
were involved for working together to get the excess line pack deal done
today.  As I understand it, TK was able to sell 10,000 MMBtu at the Cal
Border for something like $15 thanks to your efforts.  This thing went from
Dave and Kent's idea to you guys' execution in about two days, even with a
(slight) delay due to my panic attack on whether we can make downstream
sales.   Great job!   Second, I think TK, Kevin, Maria and Glen and I have
come up with a workable set of guidelines on when similar deals can be done
in the future.  The key, as I expressed in the attached email, is that the
sales be driven by a legitimate operational basis.  If Gas Control verifies
that we have excess line pack at a location and that making the sale helps
get line pack to optimal levels, such sales are appropriate.  Gas Control
should also verify that the operational basis for the sale can be documented
if the need ever arises.  Today's deal is a great example of that as we
actually communicated to outside parties that we anticipated some pressure
management issues.  If there are ever any questions about when such deals are
appropriate, or about how to document the operational basis, please give me,
Susan, or Maria a call.  Again, great job!  DF

	From:  Drew Fossum                           11/27/2000 06:01 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Fuel

This morning I raised a concern regarding TW's sale of excess fuel at
downstream points.  Here's the problem:  the tariff requires shippers to
tender fuel to us at their receipt points.  With rare exceptions, those
receipt points are not at the Cal. border.  Order 636 mandates that pipelines
unbundle transportation from storage.  It also requires that pipelines that
make gas sales do so at the furthest upstream point on their pipeline.  That
latter requirement means that if a pipe buys gas at point "x", it should
resell the gas at point "x" and not haul the gas to point "y" and then sell
it there as a delivered (i.e., bundled) product.  My concern this morning was
that our receipt of fuel gas in the San Juan or Permian and shipment of that
gas to the Cal. border for sale arguably violates the unbundling requirement
(because the Cal. border sale is a bundled combination of the sale and the
transportation of the gas to the downstream location) or the "furthest
upstream point" requirement or both.  Susan and my recollection was that when
ECS wanted to receive the Gallup fuel deliveries at  a point other than
Permian pool, we made them sign a transport contract to move the gas to where
they wanted it.  I haven't confirmed that recollection but I am recalling
that we told Courtney that we couldn't just move our fuel gas around
whereever we wanted it--we needed someone to pay us to transport it.

Irrespective of what we did with ECS, I think the following is the correct
way to look at this situation:  We receive fuel at the shippers' receipt
points.  Once we receive it, however, it is no longer "fuel."  It becomes
line pack until it is burned.   Line pack moves around based on a lot of
reasons, including shipper imbalances, etc.  It also, obviously, has to move
to the compressors where it is burned as fuel.   It is our job to  manage
line pack, and that means we buy line pack at locations where we are short,
and sell it at locations where we are long.  If we end up long at the Cal.
border from time to time, we should sell excess line pack to get line pack
back to optimal levels.  I wouldn't want to get into a pattern where we are
consistently buying line pack in the San Juan and Permian and selling line
pack at the Cal. border, but  thats not what we are talking about here.  I
can't think of anything in the tariff or otherwise that is inconsistent with
this interpretation of our authority as operator of the pipeline.  MKM--OK
with you?  DF


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011401.txt


Frank/Scott - I redistributed the dollar amounts among the line items in the 'Adjusted 2002 Plan' column but I left the totals the same.  Please let me know if you agree with these changes.

Thanks,
Laynie
x3-3131


thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lori W. Walter" <lwalter@wolfblock.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	jsteffe@enron.com; smontova@enron.com; thoatson@enron.com
Subject:	Press Release Preview

  FYI - See discussion of RTOs.

 http://puc.paonline.com/press_releases/Press_Releases.asp?UtilityCode=EL&UtilityName=Electric&PR_ID=733&View=PressRelease

 - PressRel.url << File: PressRel.url >>


Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
 Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
 Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and
privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
 YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer
browser, 5.0 or higher.


hello....long time no see.  how are y'all doing these days?

i'm actually writing bc i've misplaced em's phone number in london and wanted to give her a buzz.  do either of you have it on hand?  if so, could you please email it back to me.  thanks

em also mentioned something about NB in mid Sept...i'd love to see y'all if you decide to meet up with her.

Susan


Oops, I sent you the wrong nom...  Here is the correct HPL Nom for August 11,
2000..  Sorry....

(See attached file: hpl0811.xls)

 - hpl0811.xls


Dear Energy Professional:

We hope you enjoyed your recent free trial to Platts Energy Trader, which
provides comprehensive daily coverage of both electricity and natural gas
markets, along with such unique features as forward price assessments, spark
spreads and regular outage tables.

Though your trial has ended, you still have a chance to save $500 off the
regular rate of $1,995 by becoming a charter subscriber.

To subscribe, please fill out and return the attached form, or call our sales
department at 877-286-8897 or 212-904-2004; e-mail, info@platts.com. Be sure
to mention the charter rate.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Richard Schwartz
Marketing Director

 - et040401.pdf


E,   I will probably leave about noon or shortly thereafter on Sat. probably
return about the same on Sun.

	"Zavaleta, Ernie" <Ernie.J.Zavaleta@fritolay.com>
	02/14/2001 10:33 AM

		 To: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Hey G,

Sorry not to respond until today, I was in SA yesterday.

I meant to ask you if were going for one or two nights.  Now that I see you
plan to stay only Sat night, I'll see if I can go.  Where are you/we
spending the night?

George called and left me a message that the email address on my card wasn't
working.............looks like it worked for you.

I'll talk to the wife today about going - what time on Sat were you thinking
about going?

Talk you ya,
E


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 11:28 AM -----

	Ann M Schmidt@ENRON
	11/29/2000 10:59 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Cedric
Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lawsuit Filed In San Diego Vs Enron For Power Mkt Abuses

Lawsuit Filed In San Diego Vs Enron For Power Mkt Abuses

11/29/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- A second lawsuit is being filed in San Diego
Superior Court Wednesday against Enron alleging the company, and others,
overcharged California consumers more than $4 billion for electricity
service.
On Monday, a similar suit was filed against Dynegy Inc. (DYN), Reliant Energy
Inc. (REI), Duke Energy North America (DUK), Southern Energy Company (SO),
AES Corp., Williams Energy and NRG Energy. Both lawsuits are seeking class
action status and may be consolidated into one complaint.
The complaints allege unfair trade practices and illegal trust activity. A
news conference announcing the details of the lawsuit will be held Wednesday
morning in San Diego.
Enron does not own or operate major generating units in the state, but is
active in trading electricity here and securing long-term fixed rate
contracts for large industrial customers. At times, Enron sells power back
into the California Power Exchange, the market where power is bought and sold
in the state.
An Enron representative said he has not yet seen the lawsuit and was unable
to comment.
The lawsuits claim Enron and the other energy companies withheld power supply
last summer, created shortages by selling power out of state and used
real-time confidential data about power plant activity to drive up prices.
The lawsuits are an attempt to force generators to refund about $4 billion
for electricity, the amount consumers were allegedly overcharged. -By Jason
Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


I'm not so sure I agree with your name change for US Department of the
Interior.  I think as part of the name we've got to have that it's a govt
agency.  Anything else would be misleading to what it actually is.  I think
more appropriate would be United States Department of the Interior, Minerals
Management Service.

	Samuel Schott
	02/20/2001 05:43 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts
and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, EOL Call Center@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 2-20-01 _ GCP Response

GCP adjustments highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

Walter Guidroz@ENRON
02/20/2001 05:24 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, EOL Call Center
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 2-20-01

Please see attached.


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Tuesday, October   30, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Monday, October   29, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	         $27.00	         $23.00	         $25.55	-   6.48	          80,000
Comed	         $26.00	         $22.15	         $23.78	-   4.10	           4,000
Entergy	         $30.50	         $26.25	         $27.46	+    .96	          16,000
Nepool	         $39.25	         $37.00	         $37.37	-   2.61	           8,000
Palo Verde	         $40.00	         $37.50	         $38.79	+   4.72	           5,600
PJM-West	         $28.50	         $27.50	         $28.02	-   4.23	          50,400
SP-15	         $38.65	         $37.80	         $38.24	+   4.46	           4,000
TVA	         $27.50	         $26.75	         $27.07	-   6.04	           4,000

                                                                                Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Does this sound right bill.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:39 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW: dynegy letter re sithe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent:	Thursday, November  15, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Murphy, Harlan
Cc:	St. Clair, Carol; Tweed, Sheila; Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	dynegy letter re sithe

harlan: for forwarding to dynegy

the framework re the sithe letter:
1.added cross default to master netting agreement.
2.added acceleration of ena's payment obligations in the event of default by enron parties under the master and close-out by the dynegy parties.
3.added set off right to dynegy parties if they end up owing under the master to the remaining payment obligations of ena.

re the master netting agreement which you will send:
1. added cross default to ena's payment obligations under the sithe letter.
2. added set off right to dynegy parties like in 3. above.


If anyone needs to reschedule this meeting, please call me at x5-5589.

Thanks,
Juanita.


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Email Alert

Internet Daily
for Tuesday, November 27, 2001
by Frank Barnako CBS MarketWatch.com

Web users surf twice as much at work

Web surfers in Italy, France, Australia and the U.S. who access
the Internet from work spend considerably more time online than
home Internet users. "Work Internet usage adds up to more time
spent online and more Internet sessions, undoubtedly due to
greater connection speeds and better usability," explained
Richard Goosey, chief of measurement science and analytics at
Nielsen/NetRatings.  He said marketers should take the work
audience into account. "Applications such as banking, online
trading and industry-specific directory searches are well
targeted to the focused work audience," he said. In the U.S.,
NetRatings reported, male Web users spent an average of 21 hours
44 minutes online at work each month and 11 hours 34 minutes at
home.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Osama bin Laden, Harry Potter among top searches

Terra Lycos  reported that Osama bin Laden continued to be its
most popular search term last week. Dragonball, Christmas,
Thanksgiving and Harry Potter were also among the top 5 searches
the site handled. The most popular cast member of Harry Potter
isn't Harry himself,  Daniel Radcliff. According to Web users,
the breakout star is actor Sean Biggerstaff, who portrays
Harry's Quidditch rival, Oliver Wood.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Palm to end portal services

Palm Inc.  said it will close its free MyPalm Web portal Jan.
10. Services such as an online calendar, address book and
personal data will be deleted, the company said in a notice on
its Web site. Services for wireless subscribers to Palm.Net will
continue. A spokeswoman for the company told CNET interest in
Web-based personal information management turned out to be less
than expected. Advertising and subscriptions did not prove to be
sources for adequate revenue.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Two-thirds of car buyers use Web

Sixty-two percent of all new-vehicle buyers are turning to the
Internet for shopping information. Most go to the Web before
they visit dealers, according to a J.D. Power and Associates
study. Last year, Power reported 54% of vehicle shoppers relied
on the Internet. On average, an automotive Internet user visits
6.8 automotive sites before making a purchase, the research
showed. Most also prefer independent Web sites. Kelley Blue Book
 was the most visited site, as it has been for the past three
years. Edmunds.com was said to be the most useful site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

For late-breaking market news you can't afford to miss, go to
http://CBS.MarketWatch.com/

================================================================

LOGIN to access your account:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start

----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel. (0801-11478)

Copyright 2001 CBS MarketWatch. All rights reserved.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, printed or
electronic, is prohibited.

Distribution by Quris, Inc.


FYI.  Today's update.

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001
05:55 PM ---------------------------
From: Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 05:25 PM
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: PGE Bankruptcy motions

fyi
 -----Original Message-----
From:  "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22JOHN+20G+20KLAUBERG+22+20+3CJKLAUBER+40LLGM+2ECOM+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:01 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: CARL A. EKLUND; JAMES L. HUEMOELLER
Subject: Fwd: PGE

Michael:  as you know, one of my SF bankruptcy partners, Ben Young, attended
the PG&E hearing today.  Here is a quick synopsis.  Could you please
distribute as appropriate.  John

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 15:46:25 -0400
From: "BENNETT G. YOUNG" <BYOUNG@LLGM.COM>
To: ceklund@llgm.com, "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>, "JAMES L.
HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM>
Subject: PGE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

I attended the hearings on PGE's two cash collateral motions today.  Both
were granted on an interim basis.  The court set a final hearing for May 9 at
9:30 am.  PGE is to file its pleadings by April 20 and any opposition is due
by May 4.

The bondholder cash collateral motion was heard first.  There was no
opposition and the bond trustee (Bank of New York) consented to the relief.
BONY and PGE are working on a final cash collateral stipulation.

Next was the gas supplier motion.  PGE mentioned in its presentation that the
basis of the pre-petition agreement was the waiver of termination rights in
the event of bankruptcy by the suppliers in return for a security interest in
the receivables.  Jim Lopes, PGE's lawyer, mentioned that he had learned a
great deal about Bankruptcy Code section 556 in the last few months.  Judge
Montali nodded his head at that comment.  Montali also asked whether PGE
conceded that 556 applied.  Lopes answered that he did not concede that it
applied, but he was "very concerned."

I asked whether the post-petition security interest was available to
suppliers that were not parties to the pre-petition agreements.  The Court
said that was up to PGE; Lopes said they were willing to talk about it, but
they did not want to grant liens to all of their creditors and hoped
creditors would rely on their administrative claims, which PGE believes will
be paid in the ordinary course.  Procedurally, the Court said it would not
authorize any new security interests on the basis of the interim order
resulting from today's hearing.  Instead, that would have to be the subject
of a separate motion with notice, and perhaps coujld be taken up at the final
hearing.
P
 GE also indicated that it is filing today a lawsuit against the CPUC seeking
a TRO regarding a deadline of April 11 for the filing of certain advice
letters.  A hearing is tentatively scheduled on the TRO for 3 pm tomorrow,
April 10.

There was also discussion of various administrative matters, like scheduling
hearings, entering a case management order, etc.

A representative of a consumer group, the Coalition for Public Power, read a
statement asking Judge Montali to rollback rates and to force PGE's parent to
pay the utility's debts.  The Judge let them speak, but made it clear that it
was not an action item, and seemed generally to ignore them.

The courtroom was packed with attorneys, journalists and members of the
public.  After the hearing, the reporters all descended upon the attorneys
for PGE and the CPUC.  The courtroom is in an office building in SF's
financial district; there were probably ten TV cameras set up on the sidewalk
as well as several protesters carrying signs.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Bennett G. Young
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 951-1167
byoung@llgm.com


Mark,

Here are some descriptions which will be helpful on the Determination Period
issue which London Global Products have.

Thanks,

Dave


Attached is the latest version. The retail numbers have been updated. The
transport numbers are currently being cross referenced to the master list John
Hodge has been cleaning up, in order to make sure everything is included. The
pricing was discussed yesterday between an ENA group and myself. I believe a
few minor changes are in order and need to be agreed upon.

Please forward any changes or questions to me. Thanks.

 - EXHIBIT.xls


Rita Hennesey 33075
Acey (Rudi Zipter's office)


I told your Mom maybe the following Sunday!  I just want to be home by the
4th so we have time to unwind?

Love ya long time handsome!

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <jwhitt@gvec.net>
To: MAWhitt@aol.com
Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:40:13 GMT
Subject:

I hope if you are here Sun. you can go to church with us so we can show the
kids (and you and mark) off.  i had thought we could go Christmas Eve
(that's always a beautiful service) but if we go to Corpus, that would be
impossible.  MJ
----- Original Message -----
From: <MAWhitt@aol.com>
To: <jwhitt@gvec.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: Yippee!!!!

> It should be fun I wonder however if we are crazy-Brock HATES riding in
the
> car.  I am contacting a Homeopath today to find out about something to
help
> keep him calm.  We are really looking forward to getting away and visiting
> and it sounds like we will be pretty busy.  We don't know yet what all we
can
> cram in but we would like to stay with Rob and Kim a couple days and
> hopefully see the new baby, also go to the Sproulls for a couple and down
to
> Albert's to see all the new kids there.  Mark really wants to see all his
> cousins and their kids because we have never done that.
>
> We also wanted to try to take Lauren to either Sea World or some six flags
> deal there in San Antonio and stop to see Uncle James and Marsha on the
way
> back.  What do you think?  Can we do all that?  Leave it to a Whitt to
cram
> as much adventure into something as possible.
>
> As far as the kids don't worry about anything.  I will bring the crib but
do
> you still have the highchair deal we got last time we were there?
>
> I was wondering, is there a gym anywhere in Gonzales that I could go to
while
> I am there or any yoga classes offered?
>
> Can't wait to give everyone great big hugs!  Lauren is already packing her
> suitcase for the trip!
>
>


Jeffrey

Thanks for your email. I am very sorry but we sold this book the day after we
received your order. We did not realise that it was  someone else ordering it
and presumed it was from the same initial inquiry. However, we should be able
to locate another copy at the same price, if you would still like it. Once
again - many apologies.

Kind Regards - Nick Higbee


Kay,  Herman suggested the changes to our form of Memorandum (in red).  My
question is, since we are defining Optionee as "________________________,
LLC, its designee or permitted assignees"  is it really necessary to include
the second reference to designee or permitted assignees?

This MEMORANDUM OF PURCHASE OPTION (this "Memorandum") is made and entered
into effective as of the _____________________, 2001 by and between
_______________________________ (hereinafter referred to as "Optionor"), and
____________________________________, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability,
OR ITS DESIGNEE OR PERMITTED ASSIGNEES (hereinafter referred to as
"Optionee").  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meaning given to them in that certain Option to Purchase Real Estate dated
__________________________, 2001, by and between Optionor and Optionee (the
&Agreement8).

Optionor and Optionee are parties to the Agreement covering certain real
property situated in ____________________________ County, ______________, and
more particularly described on Exhibit &A8 attached hereto and incorporated
for all purposes (the &Property8).  Pursuant to the Agreement, Optionor
granted to Optionee an option to purchase the Property (the &Option8), as
more particularly described therein, which Option expires _____________
(subject to Optionee,s rights to extend the Option for ___________ renewal
term(s) of ______________ (____) months ending ________________________,
unless Optionee, ITS DESIGNEE OR ITS PERMITTED ASSIGNEE delivers to Optionor
a notice of exercise of its option to purchase the Property prior to such
expiration date, as may be extended.

Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North  America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037


One of your friends sent this email through our website.
Friend's name: Angela  Barnett
Friend's IP address: 192.152.140.9
Date and Time: 11/10/00 7:44:43 AM EST
See the bottom of this message to report abuse.

Hi,

Angela  Barnett would like you to see this Web page:

http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless135p.htm

this is nice

================================================
Angela  Barnett also included this note:

================================================

Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!
Win a Billion Dollars!

go to:
http://mailbits.net/grab/taf.asp
Win a Billion Dollars !!!

____
***IMPORTANT NOTE***

This is a free service provided by MailBits.com.
Compared to regular email, this is a better way to
recommend a website to your friends. That's because
information about the sender of the message is included
to prevent and catch abuse of the system.

To report abuse of this service: abuse-taf@mailbits.com


Here is the bbq that I was talking about on Saturday. Let me know if you want
to go.
-E

Phillip M Love
07/25/2000 09:01 AM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CLEAR LAKE

Just wanted to remind you guys of the get together this weekend for the Texas
guys at my house.  Please let me know by Friday if you will be able to come
and I will draw up some maps.  I was thinking about 5 p.m. to get started.
Beer and burgers will be on the menu with a little bit of billards action.
Please bring your significant others(Mick, please only bring one).
PL


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/31/2001 04:25 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/31/2001 09:23 AM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick
Johnson <rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra
McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick
Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan
Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, "msmith1@enron.com" <msmith1@enron.com>,
"ryang@enron.com" <ryang@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>,
"vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>,
"William.S.Bradford@enron.com" <William.S.Bradford@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: ABX 1

ABX 1 passed out of the Senate Appropriations Committee moments ago on a
vote of 7-2.  The bill received no Republican votes.  I have attached
the amended version of the bill for your review.  The bill will be taken
up on the Senate floor shortly, then will go back to the Assembly for
concurrence this afternoon.

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/abx1_1_bill_20010130_amended_
sen.pdf


[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
Dear  SmartReminders Member,

 			[IMAGE]
 			[IMAGE]

 	[IMAGE] 		Save  at Orvis!  Orvis - Since 1856.  Providing distinctive clothing, gear, luggage & home goods inspired  by our Sporting Traditions. America's oldest mail order company offering  the best guarantee in the business.

 	[IMAGE] 		Save  $20 at J. Jill!  Save $20, J. Jill's Special Gift to You For a limited time, save $20 on  your order of $150 or more when you shop jjill.com. This special offer is  good for J. Jill's newest holiday items as well as our best of season sale  items. Shop now for the best selection. Expires November 30, 2001.

 	[IMAGE]   		 Free  Shipping at Johnston & Murphy!  Get Free Shipping from  Johnston & Murphy! Johnston & Murphy is the ultimate resource for all types of men's  footwear including classic, contemporary, and casual styles. Complete  your wardrobe with fashionable men's apparel and accessories that  define style.

We respect  your privacy and are a Certified Participant of the BBBOnLine
 Privacy Program.  To be removed from future offers,click  here.
SmartReminders.com  is a permission based service. To unsubscribe click  here .