Dear Generation/Power Marketing Executive:

The following is 1) this week's Alliance of Energy Suppliers' Express, and 2)
listing of recent filings at FERC.  Attached for your information is a report
in a PDF format summarizing significant filings.

                                  Alliance of Energy Suppliers Express
December 12, 2000

INSIDE WASHINGTON

The Week Ahead*

***Congress is poised to finish FY2001 appropriation bills and conclude the
106th Congress this week.
***FERC meets tomorrow, and is expected to issue a final rule on the market
interventions for California's ailing electricity market.  Other important
cases on the agenda include Illinois Powers' withdrawal from the Midwest ISO.

FEDERAL AFFAIRS

***Commission Approves CA-ISO Request For $250 Soft Price Cap***

FERC late last week approved a price cap change requested by the California
Independent System Operator (ISO), in response to the emergency conditions in
the California electricity market.  The current purchase price cap of $250
per Mwh will be lifted, and bids above that amount will be allowed but will
not set the clearing price paid to all sellers, as does the current purchase
price cap.  FERC notes this should attract more bids and alleviate supply
shortages.  Parties bidding above $250 will be required to report their bids
to FERC on a weekly basis and provide cost information.

FERC also authorized the ISO to penalize participating generators that
refusal to operate in response to an ISO request in an emergency.

MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

 ***Constellation Energy Group Subsidiary Purchases Nine Mile Point Nuclear
Plants***

Constellation Energy Group announced plans to purchase 100 percent of Nine
Mile Point Unit 1 and 82 percent of Unit 2 for $815 million.  Constellation
would then own a total of 1,550 megawatts of Nine Mile Point's 1,757
megawatts of total generating capacity.  The sale is expected to close in
mid-2001, after receipt of all regulatory approvals.  The company had
recently announced plans to separate its wholesale merchant energy and retail
energy businesses into two stand-alone, publicly traded companies.
Constellation also announced that their merchant energy business was ranked
fifth in the nation for sales of electric power in the third quarter of 2000.

***Cinergy Affiliate To Acquire Two Merchant Generating Plants From Enron***

Cinergy Corporation has announced that Cinergy Capital & Trading, a
non-regulated affiliate, has signed a definitive agreement to purchase two
natural gas-fired merchant electric generating facilities located in the
Southeastern United States.   The acquisition consists of Enron's
494-megawatt Brownsville generation facility located in Tennessee, and the
504-megawatt Caledonia generation facility in Mississippi.  The transaction
will increase Cinergy's generation portfolio to about 21,000 megawatts, with
the non-regulated portion being about 15,000 megawatts.  "Cinergy has created
a regional leadership position in the Midwest power market and is focused on
strategic opportunities to expand our footprint," said Michael Cyrus,
president of Cinergy Capital & Trading.  He noted that the transaction
increases the non-regulated generating capacity "in excess of 30 percent in
just over a year."

NEW GENERATION

***Construction Of Edison Mission Power Plant in California Begins; Peaking
Unit To Be Online by August***

Edison Mission Energy (EME), an Edison International company, has started
construction of its Sunrise power plant on Thursday, December 7, having
received expedited approval from the California Energy Commission (CEC) to
proceed.  The facility will be located in Kern County, California, and will
bring both short- and long-term generation capacity to the state.  The
project will be completed in two phases.  Phase 1 will consist of a
320-megawatt simple-cycle peaking facility scheduled to be in service next
summer.  Phase 2 will convert the peaking facility to a 560-megawatt
combined-cycle operation with an in-service date of summer 2003.  Final
regulatory authority has been received only for Phase 1.

RISK MANAGEMENT

 ***Business Group Releases Final Report on Retail Energy Markets***

An energy industry group that includes utilities, energy suppliers,
regulators, vendors, consumer advocates and trade organizations last week
released the second and last volume of its report on Uniform Business
Practices for retail energy markets.  This volume comprehensively addresses
unbundled electricity metering.  Volume Ireleased last monthaddressed the
issues of customer information, customer enrollment & switching, billing &
payment processing, load profiling, supplier licensing, market participant
interaction, disputes between the utility and the supplier, and customer
inquiries.

"Uniform business transactions may help lower barriers to market entry,
encourage new product lines, reduce utility distribution company system costs
to accommodate retail access, and give customers more price and product
benefits," said Mike McGrath, EEI Group Director of Customer and Energy
Service.  To download the report, or for more information on the UBP effort,
see www.ubpnet.org.

***Upcoming Conference:  Achieving Profitability & Operational Safety in a
Competitive Marketplace - Co-Sponsored by the Alliance of Energy Suppliers***

An executive conference on safety in fossil power plants will be held in
Baltimore, Maryland next March 18-20.  The conferencechaired by leading
members of the power generation industrywill gather corporate leaders and
senior managers to discuss safety as a critical business issue in the
deregulating environment.  Charles Kelly, EEI's Director of Industry Human
Resource Issues, is on the advisory board of the meeting.  For more
information, or to download a conference program, visit
www.electricpowerexpo.com/safetyconference.html.

ENERGY DATA

*** Weekly Electric Output (Week 49)***

Electric output reached 69,281 GWh for the week ending December 2 (Week 49),
with the highest increase over 1999 levels in the Pacific Northwest region,
which had a 9.5 percent increase over 1999.  Looking at year-to-date
information, the Pacific Southeast leads the nation in growth of output.  For
more information, email alliance@eei.org.

The Alliance Express is a free news service sponsored by the Alliance of
Energy Suppliers.  This document can be redistributed.  Please send
questions, comments, or requests to alliance@eei.org, or telephone
202/508-5680.

                                  == RECENT FERC FILINGS ==

(1)  RTO ORDER 2000 DEVELOPMENTS

*  GRIDFLORIDA filed an answer to comments filed regarding its Order 2000 RTO
Compliance Filing.  RT01-67-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  DAYTON POWER & LIGHT filed an answer to the protest of the COALITION OF
MIDWEST TRANSMISSION CUSTOMERS regarding its Order 2000 RTO Compliance
Filing.  RT01-37-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.  filed an update with respect to its activities to
participate in an RTO.  RT01-13-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  GRIDSOUTH filed an answer to ENRON POWER MARKETING regarding GRIDSOUTH's
Order 2000 RTO Compliance Filing.  RT01-74-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT, DUKE ENERGY CORP. and SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC &
GAS filed a joint answer to protests filed in GRIDSOUTH's Order 2000 RTO
Compliance Filing.  RT01-74-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES made one filing as an answer to ENRON's motion
opposing conditioning market-based rate authority on RTO participation and
another filing answering comments regarding its petition for a declaratory
order.  RT01-77-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  PJM and PJM TRANSMISSION OWNERS each filed answers to protests and
comments made in PJM's Order 2000 RTO Compliance Filing.  RT01-2-000.  Filed
December 5, 2000.

*  AVISTA CORP., BONNEVILLE POWER ADMIN., IDAHO POWER, MONTANA POWER CO.,
PACIFICORP and PUGET SOUND ENERGY jointly and RTO WEST each filed amended
supplemental compliance filings and requests for declaratory order.  RTO WEST
also filed answers to protests.  RTO-35-000.  Filed December 1, 2000.

*  ENTERGY filed an answer to comments regarding its Order 2000 RTO
Compliance Filing.  RT01-75-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  TRANSCONNECT filed an answer to comments regarding its Order 2000 RTO
Compliance Filing.  RT01-15-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRICAL POWER CO. and PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
filed answers to protests regarding the SPP's Order 2000 RTO Compliance
Filing.  RT01-34-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  SPP filed an answer to comments regarding its Order 2000 RTO Compliance
Filing.  RT01-34-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  WESTERN RESOURCES and KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO. filed an answer to their
Order 2000 RTO Compliance Filing.  RT01-6-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT filed an answer to MISSOURI RIVER ENERGY
SERVICE's motion for a technical conference on rate design issues and other
relief.  RT01-1-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  MAINE ELECTRIC POWER CO. filed an answer to MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL
WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO.'s comments regarding its Order 2000 RTO Compliance
Filing.  RT01-19-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOP. and the WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION each
filed an answer to MISSOURI RIVER ENERGY SERVICES' comments in the following
Order 2000 RTO Compliance filings:  RT01-1, 38, 40, 44, 53, 63, 78 -000.
Filed December 5, 2000.

*  UTILICORP filed an answer to comments in the following Order 2000 RTO
Compliance filings:  RT01-4, 29, 45, -000 and Dockets EC00-27-000 and
EC00-28-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  CLECO UTILITY GROUP filed a motion of opposition to a motion to
consolidate and a request for a Commission investigation regarding the
following Order 2000 RTO Compliance filings:  RT01-25, 34, 75 -000.  Filed
December 5, 2000.

(2)  OTHER RTO DEVELOPMENTS

*  SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE CO. filed to request to defer its decision
from joining the MIDWEST ISO.  EC99-101-002.  Filed November 17, 2000.

*  CA ISO filed a supplemental answer to the CITY OF VERNON, CA's complaint
regarding a transmission control agreement.  EL01-14-000.  Filed December 1,
2000.

*  CITY OF VERNON filed a motion for leave to answer the CA ISO's
supplemental answer to the CITY's complaint.  EL01-14-000.  Filed December 7,
2000.

*  The following entities filed for rehearing or comments regarding the
Commission's November 1, 2000 Order proposing remedies for the California
wholesale electric market.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed December 1, 2000.

-  GOVERNOR GRAY DAVIS
-  CA ISO
-  The SAN DIEGO ASSOC. of GOVERNMENTS and the SAN DIEGO REGIONAL ENERGY
OFFICE
-  CITY OF SAN DIEGO
-  ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY ASSOC.
-  DYNEGY, EL SEGUNDO, LONG BEACH and CABRILLO I, II
-  DUKE ENERGY COMPANIES
-  CAL PX
-  AES CORP.
-  ENRON COMPANIES
-  RETX.COM

*  The CITY OF CHULA VISTA filed comments regarding the Commission's November
1, 2000 Order proposing remedies for the California wholesale electric
market.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed December 6, 2000.

*  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. filed a motion for the issuance of a
subpoena to the market surveillance committee of the CA ISO for the
production of documentary evidence, specifically information demonstrating
market power.  EL00-95-000, et. al.  Filed December 7, 2000.

*  PG&E NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, PG&E GENERATING, USGEN NEW ENGLAND and PG&E
ENERGY TRADING-POWER filed a motion to intervene and comment regarding
NEPOOL's Sixty-Seventh revised NEPOOL Agreement, which changes the
amortization and repayment method for certain expenses related to NEPOOL's
restructuring incurred before May 1, 1999, and its Sixty-Eighth revised
NEPOOL Agreement regarding the same expenses incurred after January 1, 2000.
ER01-459-000.  Filed on December 6, 2000.

*  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. filed a protest to the CITY OF VERNON's
compliance filing, specifically to the CITY's revised Transmission Owner
Tariff.  EL00-105-001.  Filed December 7, 2000.

*  SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. (SO CAL ED) filed a response to various
motions filed in opposition to its request to establish wholesale and retail
rates for the recovery of reliability service charges, including Reliability
Must Run generation costs and Out of Market dispatch costs, that the CA ISO
charges SO CAL ED.  ER01-315-000.  Filed December 7, 2000.

*  The CA ISO filed an answer to and the INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOC.
filed an motion to dismiss the complaint filed by the CALIFORNIANS for
RENEWABLE ENERGY regarding the California wholesale market.  EL01-2-000.
Filed November 30, 2000.

*  CA ISO filed an answer to motions regarding its filed proposed unbundled
Grid Management Charge.  ER01-313-000.  Filed December 7, 2000.

*  ISO NE filed a compliance filing informing the Commission when it expects
to implement its proposal for a congestion management system and
multi-settlement system.  EL00-62-014.  Filed December 1, 2000.

*  NEPOOL filed an informational filing regarding the implementation of a new
structural screen in NEPOOL's market power monitoring and mitigation rule.
EL00-83-000 et. al.  Filed December 1, 2000.

(3) OATT/TRANSMISSION

*  NORTHWEST GENERATING COOP. filed a motion for rehearing regarding the
Commission's Order confirming and approving  BONNEVILLE POWER
ADMINISTRATION's rate schedule on a final basis.  EF00-2013-001.  Filed
November 27, 2000.

*  The following entities filed to intervene in PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC's
proposal to pass along the CA ISO's grid management charge.  ER01-424-000.
Filed December 1, 2000.

-  TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT
-  NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY
-  WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
-  CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
-  CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CA
-  CITIES OF REDDING AND SANTA CLARA, CA AND THE M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY
-  SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
-  TRINITY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
-  MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT

*  SIERRA PACIFIC POWER and NEVADA POWER CO. filed a request for rehearing
and clarification and SEI MICHIGAN filed a motion to protest regarding SIERRA
and NEVADA's compliance filing changing their tariffs. ER00-3188-002.  Filed
December 4, 2000.

*  AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM filed an answer to protests regarding its
proposed amendment to its OATT in order to conform to Ohio's retail
competition laws.  ER01-256-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC (PG&E) filed a motion for clarification or
rehearing regarding the Commission's November 22, 2000 Order wherein the
Commission did not summarily rule that PG&E's proposed transmission rates
improperly included "generation tie" and "generation step-up" facilities.
ER01-66-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC (PG&E) filed an answer to motions to reject and
requests for suspension and expedited resolutions regarding its proposed
revisions to its Coordinated Operations Agreement to reflect the changes in
the California electric industry.  ER01-276-000.  Filed December 6, 2000.

*  ALLIANCE COMPANIES filed an answer to DYNEGY POWER MARKETING, CORAL POWER
and ENRON POWER MARKETING's motion for clarification or technical conference
regarding ALLIANCE's pro forma generator interconnection procedures and
agreement contained in the proposed ALLIANCE RTO OATT.  ER99-3144-004 and
EC99-80-004.  Filed December 6, 2000.

*  DUKE ENERGY filed an answer to NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORP.'s
motion to protest and consolidate regarding the transition from a power
supply arrangement with DUKE ENERGY involving Partial requirements for
service and non-tariff network transmission service to a new arrangement
involving Network Integration Transmission Service purchased pursuant to
DUKE's OATT.  ER01-282-000 and ER01-283-000.  Filed December 6, 2000.

*  The following entities filed motions to intervene regarding ARIZONA PUBLIC
SERVICE CO.'s filed proposed revisions to its OATT for terms and conditions
for interconnection and a pro forma interconnection and operating agreement.
ER01-463-000.  Filed December 7, 2000.

-  DUKE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA and ENRON POWER MARKETING
-  RELIANT ENERGY POWER GENERATION
-  DYNEGY POWER CORP.
-  SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT

(4) MARKET COMPLAINTS

*  The following entities filed motions to intervene and comment regarding
the NYISO's complaint against NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC AND GAS (NYSEG)
alleging that NYSEG has violated its obligations as a customer under the
NYISO's OATT by withholding $6.635 million that it owes NYISO.  EL01-17-000.
Filed December 6, 2000.

-  NRG POWER MARKETING and its affiliated companies
-  AQUILA ENERGY MARKETING CORP.
-  NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORP.
-  PG&E NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP
-  SOUTHERN ENERGY COMPANIES AND SITHE POWER MARKETING
-  INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS OF NEW YORK
-  NYSEG

(5) MERGERS/CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING

*  DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT, which is the process of becoming solely a wires
company, filed an application to assign its rights and obligations under two
wholesale purchase agreements with PEPCO and ELECTRIC CLEARINGHOUSE to
CONECTIV ENERGY SUPPLY.  EC01-34-000.  Filed December 1, 2000.

*  AMERICAN REF-FUEL COMPANY OF HEMPSTEAD, BFI ENERGY SYSTEMS OF HEMPSTEAD,
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, DUKE/UAE REF-FUEL, DUKE/UAE HEMPSTEAD I and II,
UNITED AMERICAN ENERGY CORP. and DUKE ENERGY filed for two separate approvals
of dispositions of certain jurisdictional assets.  EC01-37-000 and
EC01-38-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  SEMASS PARTNERSHIP, AMERICAN REF-FUEL COMPANY OF SEMASS, ALLIED WASTE
INDUSTRIES, BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK, BFI ENERGY SYSTEMS OF
SEMASS, DUKE/UAE OPERATIONS OF SEMASS, DUKE/UAE REF-FUEL, UNITED AMERICAN
ENERGY CORP. (UAE) AND DUKE ENERGY CORP. filed for approval of dispositions
of certain jurisdictional assets.  EC01-39-000.  Filed December 5, 2000.

*  AMERICAN REF-FUEL COMPANY OF ESSEX COUNTY, ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, BFI
ENERGY SYSTEMS OF ESSEX COUNTY, DUKE/UAE REF-FUEL, DUKE/UAE ESSEX, DUKE/UAE
ESSEX II, UNITED AMERICAN ENERGY CORP. AND DUKE ENERGY CORP. Filed for
approval of dispositions of certain jurisdictional assets.  EC01-40-000.
Filed on December 5, 2000.

*  PG&E NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, PG&E ENTERPRISES and PG&E SHAREHOLDINGS filed
for approval of the upstream ownership of the subsidiaries' jurisdictional
facilities following a proposed intra-corporate reorganization.
EC01-41-000.  Filed December 4, 2000.

*  NRG ENERGY, NRG GRANITE ACQUISITION, LS POWER and GRANITE POWER PARTNERS
filed for approval to transfer certain jurisdictional facilities.
EC01-42-000.  Filed December 6, 2000.

(6) MISCELLANEOUS

*  The NY ISO filed a report on certain generation issues one year after
start-up in Docket Nos. ER97-1523-003 and 4, OA97-470-004 and 5, and
ER97-4234-002 and 3.  Filed December 1, 2000.

*  WABASH VALLEY POWER filed comments regarding the proposed termination of
CINERGY's operating agreement.  ER01-200-000.  Filed December 4, 2000.

*  CINERGY filed an answer to WABASH VALLEY POWER's comments regarding the
proposed termination of CINERGY's operating agreement.  ER01-200-000.  Filed
December 6, 2000.

_________________________________________________________

 - FercFilings121100.PDF


In case you haven't seen this site, the  California State Controller's Office has posted the long-term energy contracts online.  Here's the web link.

http://www.sco.ca.gov/power_page/contract_info.htm

Carin Nersesian
Legislative Coordinator
Enron Corp.
1775 Eye St. NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC   20006
202-466-9144 (ph.)
202-828-3372 (fax)


Bill:
Here are the two CA's we are currently working off of.  The first one is
Enron's latest draft and the second one is Cinergy's latest draft.  Enron
usually does not get into stand-still agreements, but we decided to in this
case.  We have been exchanging comments for two weeks and now we need to sit
down and discuss these points from a commercial stand-point to get over these
differences.  Please give me a call when you get this so we can go through
these issues.  Thanks for your time with this issue.

Regards,
Ben
713-853-7998

Enron's version  Cinergy's version


Dan:

As you know I will be in London next week .  Could you work with Barry to get
this finalized.  It sound to me like all that needs to be done is print the
document and put your initials on it.  There is also an index confirm to
prepare.

Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000 01:38 PM -----

	Barry Tycholiz
	11/03/2000 12:37 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Crestar Master Firm Amendments

Jeff, I understand that Stacey is on maternity leave.  This confirm is long
over due. I have been working with Stacey to get it done. The attached
document in it's finished state is what the customer and I have agreed to .
Can you please have someone finalize the document and send back down to me
for signatures.

Barry

PS. I also need the daily index confirm and we will clean it up also. BT
---------------------- Forwarded by Barry Tycholiz/CAL/ECT on 11/03/2000
11:33 AM ---------------------------

Barry Tycholiz
11/02/2000 10:56 AM
To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Crestar Master Firm Amendments

Stacey,  please find attached the completed marked up GTC that we need to
finalize and re-submit to Crestar.

TO DO:    I have added a line in part 3 ( blue).  Add this section .  Either
add in other terms that section 2 and 5 are not applicable for just delete
them.. my preference is to just exclude them in the other terms piece rather
than delete completely.

This will complete the monthy volumes confirm for Crestar. Make these changes
and send back to me today.

Thanks.

OTHER:  Please e-mail to me the latest version of the AOS balancing confirm
and I will add changes that we went through.

Call me if you have any questions but we are almost there...

PS.  we must get this done now because as of Nov. 6 Crestar loses some of
their staff and I don't want to start over on this process with new people.


Thanks.

	Debra Perlingiere 05/21/2001 10:41 AM 	   To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Wellstar

Theresa has changed the price to  "less $.70"  and suggested I insert  meter numbers rather than well names.    Pending further changes I will send to Wellstar.

dp

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


BETH!!!  Donna!!!   Welcome to the party!

Wade, I don't know how to handle these deals in Sitara or Tagg but I bet someone on this distribution does.

1.  Does anyone have any idea on how to stop deals 340305 and 332163 from creating an invoice each month?

2.  There are deal volumes in Sitara for the East, Central and West desk.  Should these volumes be zeroed out or should we just focus on keeping tagg updated and not worry about Sitara?  Maybe someone is working on the Sitara deal volumes.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Price, Wade R.
Sent:	Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:31 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed
Cc:	Dhont, Margaret; Doner, Max; Couch, Greg; Mills, Scott; Bussell l, Kathryn
Subject:	RE: Deal for Midland Cogen w triggers

Chris -Can we get these deals fixed (delete the triggers) so they can be reversed (corrected) in Unify?  We have April-02 out on A/R all ready, but May-02 is still in draft status (we have not closed the accrual/accounting month change in Unify for ENA).

The sooner the better.  Please let me know.

Thanks  WRP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:23 PM
To:	Price, Wade R.; McMichael Jr., Ed
Cc:	Dhont, Margaret; Doner, Max; Couch, Greg; Mills, Scott
Subject:	RE: Deal for Midland Cogen w triggers

I don't think the triggers are correct.

Ed, this brings up a good question that may already be addressed. Both of the Midland deals still show up in the trading system.  Should they be terminated effective 6/1/2002?  One of the Midland deals (MCV 2, deals #340305 and 332163) was put in Sitara with triggers.  We stopped serving MCV 2 effective 4/1/2002.  These triggers will continue to create an invoice each month unless we change the deal in Sitara.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Price, Wade R.
Sent:	Monday, June 03, 2002 1:57 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Dhont, Margaret; Doner, Max
Subject:	Deal for Midland Cogen w triggers

Please check into deals 332163 and 340305 for sales invoices to Midland Cogen.  Max Doner thought these deals would not trigger activity anymore per your note to him on 5/13.  I see where these deals were updated by you on that date.  Are the deals legit, or are the triggers generated legit.  Please let me know ASAP.

Thanks  WRP


Hello!  Please send me your fax number.  I have a list of "Final and Proposed
Regulations" which needs to be updated.  I would like to fax you the list.
Thanks.  Sara


---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT on 03/05/2000
05:44 PM ---------------------------

Todd Johnson <Todd.Johnson.B@bayer.com> on 03/01/2000 12:33:50 PM
To: Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Photos of the 2022 John Wooden Award Winner

Kev,

Check this good looking guy out!

TJ

 - LukewMom.JPG
 - Lukesnewhat.JPG
 - Lukescradlerocker.JPG


I had often wondered, now we know.

----- Original Message -----
  WHO IS JACK SCHITT??? The lineage is finally revealed. Many people are at a loss for a response when someone says "You don't know Jack Schitt!"  Read on and you'll be able to handle the situation intelligently. Jack is the only son of Awe Schitt and O. Schitt.  Awe Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, married O. Schitt, a partner of Kneedeep & Schitt, Inc. Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt and the deeply religious couple begat 6 children: Holie Schitt, Fulla Schitt, Giva Schitt, Bull Schitt, and the twins, Deap Schitt and Dip Schitt.  Against her parents wishes, Deap Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout. After 15 years of marriage, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced.  Noe Schitt later married a Mr. Sherlock, and out of devotion to her children, decided to hyphenate her last name, and became Noe Schitt-Sherlock.  Dip Schitt married a woman named Loda Dung, who became Loda Schitt.  The couple produced a nervous son, Chicken Schitt.  Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt,  inseparable throughout childhood subsequently married the Happens brothers. The local newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens wedding, which was quite an event. The Schitt-Happens children were Dawg, Byrd, and Hoarse.  Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world.  He returned from his travels with  his Italian bride, Piza Schitt. So, NOW if someone says " You don't know Jack Schitt", you can beg to differ. You not only know Jack Schitt, but the entire Schitt list!


Neal:
Referencing Apr-Oct 5315/35 and Nov-Mar 534/536, on the following volumes I
am 533/536.  Feel free to call to transact.  713-853-3230

"Wood, Neal" <Neal.Wood@usa.conoco.com> on 02/05/2001 11:33:51 AM
To: "'john.arnold@enron.com'" <john.arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: APR01-MAR02 Strip, varying monthly volumes

John,

I am interested in purchasing the following APR01-MAR02 NYMEX strip:

APR 2001 US Gas Swap NYMEX   86,650 MMBtu per month
MAY 2001 US Gas Swap NYMEX   69,018
JUN 2001 US Gas Swap NYMEX   38,820
JUL 2001 US Gas Swap NYMEX   36,927
AUG 2001 US Gas Swap NYMEX   41,019
SEP 2001 US Gas Swap NYMEX   49,938
OCT 2001 US Gas Swap NYMEX   76,252
NOV 2001 US Gas Swap NYMEX 103,140
DEC 2001 US Gas Swap NYMEX 113,696
JAN 2002 US Gas Swap NYMEX 119,015
FEB 2002 US Gas Swap NYMEX 105,902
MAR 2002 US Gas Swap NYMEX 110,769
     950,146 MMBtu Total

If interested, please indicate Enron's offer as well as where you're
offering the summer and winter strips online at the time.

Thanks in advance,

Neal Wood
Conoco Inc.
281-293-1975


you don't know

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           02/20/2001 04:42 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Card Trick

yeah- did they remove all of the cards?

Eric Bass @ ECT   02/20/2001 04:21 PM

To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Card Trick

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 04:20 PM
---------------------------

Jim Schwieger
02/20/2001 04:14 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Card Trick

---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 04:14
PM ---------------------------
From: Michael J Legler@ENRON on 02/19/2001 09:06 AM MST
Sent by: Michael J Legler@ENRON
To: lilybar44@hotmail.com, klexplore@aol.com, jblackwell@insiteobjects.com,
Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Card Trick

Pretty good Card Trick here?
 - cardtrick.pps
 - Are_you_a_professional.pps


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001 10:00 AM -----

	Becky Spencer
	03/23/2001 09:55 AM

		 To: Nidia Mendoza/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul
Radous/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@Enron, Edward
Sacks/Enron@EnronXGate, Brant Reves/Enron@EnronXGate, Veronica
Espinoza/Enron@EnronXGate, Rudwell Johnson/Enron@EnronXGate, Ken
Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Aparna Rajaram/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason R
Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Russell Diamond/Enron@EnronXGate, Darren
Vanek/Enron@EnronXGate, Carol North/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendi
LeBrocq/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: MaryHelen Martinez/NA/Enron@Enron, Janet Cones/Enron@EnronXGate, Keegan
Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Esmeralda
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nita Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Upcoming Credit/Legal Seminars

We will be continuing the Credit/Legal seminars on the following schedule.
Please add these dates to your calendars:

Session 3:  The Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13
April 4 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

Session 4:  The Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13 (continued)
April 18 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c3

Session 5:  The Credit Worksheet
May 2 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

Session 6:  Letters of Credit, Guaranties and Equity Structures
May 16 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

Session 7:  Higher Risk Counterparties, Early Termination, Master Netting
Issues and Canadian Issues
May 30 (Wednesday)
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
EB49c4

A reminder e-mail will be sent a day or two before each session.


Paul:  Could you please let me know?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/24/2000 08:13 AM -----

	Sheila Glover
	07/21/2000 02:22 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Goldman Sach Prime Broker Agreement

Sara,
Is there a Guarantee in place by Enron Corp. for ECT Investments, Inc.
relating to our prime broker agreements with Goldman Sachs?
We are talking to Goldman currently about increasing our leverage and a
guarantee may be beneficial if one does not already exist.  We are unsure if
one already exists.
Thanks,
Sheila


With the Dynegy announcement on November 9th, the U.S Trustee's office removed Enron from the PG&E Official Unsecured Creditor's Committee.  Dynegy is already on the Committee.

Important hearings in the PG&E bankruptcy are scheduled for December.   These hearings should begin to vet the issue of preemption, or the ability of the federal bankruptcy court to preempt state law under the bankruptcy code, thus freezing out the CPUC from ruling on the transfer of PG&E's generating assets to FERC jurisdiction.

We continue settlement discussions PG & E.   Including offsets in our trading contracts, our net nominal exposure to PG&E is $511 million.    The claim is disputed primarily due to the pending FERC refund case.       In initial discussions, Enron offered a $85 million discount.    PG&E has countered with a $237 million discount, a $152 million gap.  We are meeting with the company in an attempt to narrow the difference.

Southern California Edison (SCE) has broken off settlement negotiations.   The are forwarding a position that the Direct Access customers should pay a share of the IOU's undercollection, even though many Direct Access customers were sourcing their power via ESP's at that time.    Enron Government Affairs believes that the CPUC is behind SCE's position.   This regulatory scheme would have Enron owing SCE money on a net basis.

The Power Exchange (PX) Bankruptcy continues.   Enron has taken a visible role on the PC Official Unsecured Creditors Committee.     A liquidating plan in the bankruptcy should be filed shortly.


Please see the attached notice.

 - NOTICE TO ALL MARKETERS.doc


Attached is the above referenced document.  Please note, the obligation of
the Operator to make short fall loans has expired and has been removed.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, Suite 3817
Houston, Texas 77002
Tele. (713) 345-8347
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  angela.davis@enron.com


Jo Williams has asked me to help her update this map, to provide Enron Corp.
"IT" so they may add a  point and click map on the "inter net".  I have
contacted some of you by phone to update the attached map, I am asking all of
you to please carefully review this entire map, title, legend, numbers,
spelling all of it.  Please reply whether you have changes or not, about the
information that appears on it.  GIVE ME AN APPROVAL OR  DECLINE IT.  I
realize this is short notice but we would need this at least by 3 :00 PM
today Wed may 24th, Jo is trying to place this in the hands of Will Zamer
today.
Keep in mind that this map will probably be revised from some of your
comments, so it is NOT a map that should be distributed from any of you, in
fact you can delete it after you've provided us the help. I will resubmit
the final map upon it's completion. Thank-you all.
 All your time is greatly appreciated.
regards'
Maria Salazar
please call me if you would like 713.646.7256


Per your request for an update:

 1.  ECT sent its insurance claim letter out to Underwriters' adjusters in
this matter last week.  No reply has yet been received.  We will monitor.

 2.  Mitsubishi has not pushed its demurrage claim of about $260,000.  Our
solicitor, David Best, has had confirmed by our barrister that our time-bar
defense against the demurrage claim is strong.

 3.  We are paying joint testing invoices 100% and submitting them for 50 %
reimbursement to Mitsubishi.  So far, despite its agreement to do so,
Mitsubishi has not reimbursed us at all.  We suspect that if we push this,
Mitsubishi will start threatening to start up with the demurrage claim
again.  At least until we find out what Underwriters' position will be, we do
not suggest pushing Mitsubishi on this.

 I will keep you advised.

 Britt


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 11, 2001 5:00pm through May 14, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  EES
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at   1:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  7:00:00 PM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Move vlans for EES in Enron Building
Environments Impacted:  EES in Enron Building
Purpose: Provide more capacity to the network
Backout: paste in old configs
Contact(s):  Gail Kettenbrink    713-853-4524
  Michael Huang      713-345-3201

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  Corp, OTS, ETS
DATE:  MAY 15, 2001/2/2001 at  5:30:00 PM
Outage:  Migrate DSS Server to GTHOU-APPSQ03P
Environments Impacted:  DSS users will not be able to access the old server
(ENEDS01_ADAPT)after this date
Purpose: The existing server is outdated, migrating to SQL 2000 provides
increased
functionality and conforms to database platform requirements.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Mary Vollmer          713-853-3381
  Joe Hellsten           713-853-7346      713-545-4164

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  CPU replacement on server sennacca.
Environments Impacted:  RMS
Purpose: Replace faulty CPU that is offline.
Backout: Restore server to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  Decommission of the following servers:  intra, intra-dev, conman1,
aserv1, ardent, dbadmin
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: Server no longer used.  The servers will be decommissioned or
redeployed where necessary.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at   2:00:00 AM CT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 12:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  8:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at 11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Resource and OS upgrade to server fracture.
Environments Impacted:  Global company RMS  ECM
Purpose: An OS upgrade is needed to provide the disk upgrade solution.
Additionanl memory is needed as well.
Backout: Attach the old disk solution and reboot to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  ENA
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:15:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at     8:15:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:15:00 AM London
Outage:  Bounce PWRPROD1 database
Environments Impacted:  Enpower User
Purpose: Change some configuration to improve database performance
Backout: Use the old parameter file.
Contact(s):  Tantra Invedy  713 853 4304

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Quarterly Maintenance - Telephone System
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Quarterly maintenance. While voicemail nodes are being serviced (one
box at a time), a slight disruption will be experienced.
Messages will continue to be stored but will not be delivered until each node
of voicemail is back up and operational.
CMS call center management reporting will not be availalble during this
time.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard    713-853-0558

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Memory replacement for server electron.
Environments Impacted:  Unify Users
Purpose: Replace faulty memory module.
Backout: Get new memory if necessary
Restart server with out memory as last resort
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


you never need to ask.  you can always use me as a reference.  what's it for?

	Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
	09/20/2000 02:44 PM

		 To: "'jdasovic@enron.com'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: mendo road

I want to use you as a personal reference.  Is that OK?  I need your title
and direct dial number (i think it's 415-782-7822).  Write back soon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eldon Sellers
To: jdasovic@enron.com
Cc: cameron@perfect.com; psellers@pacbell.net
Sent: 9/20/00 12:37 PM
Subject: mendo road

We want to go ahead with the road repair.  Nancy said the cost was about
$900.  However, we want to hold off on doing the stumps.  Nancy doesn't
think we go there often enough to spend the money right now to do that.
Can
anything be done about the culvert that didn't entail too much expense?

I'm having difficulty finding out what the duty is on the wine we
brought in
here.  If you could, without spending a lot of time, find out what it
costs
per liter above the 3 liter amount you can bring into Mexico duty-free.
It
would help us negotiate with the authorities here if we knew what the
amount
should be.

________________________________________________________________________
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Rich,
The POGO well isn't completed yet.  They expect to be down within three
weeks.  This well is adjacent to the big EOG well that came into our system a
couple of months ago and is in the same formation.  The EOG gas is still good
gas so far.  Hopefully POGO's gas will be the same.
Thanks,  Arnie

Rich Jolly
01/18/2001 09:02 AM
To: Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron
cc: Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team
Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell
Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Pogo Interconnect

Mike this is in your court now. Can it be installed by the middle of
February? Arnie has anyone seen  a gas analysis on this?
Thanks
Rich

Michelle Lokay
01/18/2001 08:42 AM

To: Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team
Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell
Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Pogo Interconnect

According to John Havard with Pogo, we are to continue on.  With the work
order approved, I was told the landowner's notification had already begun.
Pogo is buying the required equipment (including chromotograph, monitors,
etc.), per our specifications.  They will own the equipment, but we will
operate.  Let me know if you guys have additional information...is this still
possible by the middle of February?  Thanks.

Rich Jolly
01/17/2001 05:46 AM
To: Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team
Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell
Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Pogo Interconnect

Thanks Arnie. Even if Pogo owns the meter station we want to operate it
including the flow control.This is one of the ways we're keeping our UAF
down. If I can help let me know. We do need to discuss who will operate the
facilities asap.
RJ

Arnie Bailey
01/16/2001 03:55 PM

To: Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team
Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell
Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Pogo Interconnect

Michelle,

I was wondering where we stand now on the Pogo interconnect South of WT-1 on
the West Texas Lateral.  Per our phone conversation a few days ago it sounded
like the 30 day landowner notification would be the biggest hold up.  What
will be the design capacity for the interconnect?  I think you told me, but I
can't find it in my notes.  My understanding is that there will be a
chromatograph, sulfur monitor, water monitor, flow control and a way to shut
in if pressure reaches our MAOP.  Also, who will own and operate the
station?  Let me know if I'm off base on any of this or what I've missed and
also don't hesitate to call if you need anything.  Please let us know as
things progress.

Thanks,  Arnie

Work - 505-625-8005
Home - 505-627-9230
Cell - 505-626-1530
Page - 800-586-5735


I have received several calls from you questioning the number of files that you are receiving from the payment proposal process that we are trying to put in place.  We did experience a technical problem on Tuesday and most of you received files from both the 17th & the 18th.  This problem has been addressed and we do not expect it to occur again.  However, I do want to provide you with some information to help each of you understand the number of files that you are getting as well as the data contained in each.

Attached is a spreadsheet that has been put together to document the various payment proposals that are run for each business unit, what company codes are contained in each and who the proposals are being directed to.

The first column on the worksheet titled "Approval List" documents the BU Proposal category.  For each BU the companies have been divided into Dip & Non-Dip as applicable.  This was necessary because the vendor selection criteria for each group is different and we did not want you to have to look at the Pre-petition Dip open items on a daily basis.

The second column contains the SAP proposal names.  The importance of this column is that it documents the type of information contained in each run.  Company status (Dip/Non-dip), Business unit, & type of payment.  The following is a legend on how to read the proposal name.

5-character group name (ABBBC)
A - Denotes Dip company
BBB - Business unit identifier
C - Type of payment job (E - Emergency check, C - Check/ACH, W - Wire transfer)

4-character group name (BBBC)
BBB - Business unit identifier
C - Type of Payment job  (E - Emergency check, C - Check/ACH, W - Wire transfer)

NOTE:  Not all companies have the ability to send payments via all methods.  Some companies may only be able to do 1 or 2.

The second worksheet in this file "Template list" contains a list of the company codes contained in each template.  This file does not list all company codes configured in SAP only those that have payment capabilities.

The desired result of this process is to document the items contained in the file that you DO NOT want to be pay.  (The assumption on a going forward basis is that we would be paying most of the items contained in the files.)  Please denote these items by putting "Do not pay" in the first empty column to the right of the data provided.  Once you have reviewed each file, please save it and forward on to George Wasaff.  George will then take this information to the cash committee for approval.  When the Cash Committee completes their review, George will communicate back to the ISC the information, and we will execute the proposal for payment.

I know that this is a very manual process and we are currently working with Andrew Parsons and others to automate, simplify and adjust the deadlines.  We will be communicating changes as they become available.

-----Original Message-----
From: Marcontell, Tammy
Sent: Tue 12/18/2001 7:40 AM
To: Howard, Sheila
Cc:
Subject:

This is the spreadsheet with the approval list and template names.

Tammy

<<PROPOSAL TEMPLATES.xls>>


Jon, Thank you very much for your assistance in terminating our Jan-Mar 2002
contracts.  I will follow up next week with a deal description to match up
to your transaction numbers, to help our accountants match them up properly.
Again, thanks and best wishes.  Cynthia

Cynthia L. Armstrong
Managing Dir., Nat.Gas Supply & Risk Management
Sprague Energy Corp.
Two International Drive, Suite 200
Portsmouth, NH 03801-0609
Direct Telephone: (603) 766-7412
Fax:                    (603) 430-5320
Cell:                    (603) 502-6556
Pager:                 (800) 946-4645 Pin #: 6221678


Paramy,

I did receive your e-mails and apologize for my late response.  Yes, I will
be the negotiating person for the agreement with the exception of credit
terms and issues, but will also be involved in the background with credit.

I hope to  e-mail you my comments by the end of next week.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


calendar ... also please RSVP for melissa and I to the Lay's party.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/17/2000 08:42 PM -----

	Julie Clyatt
	12/15/2000 04:55 PM

		 To: Caroline Schaeffer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Blaylock/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angela
Ernest/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kim Cadena/HOU/EES@EES, Samantha
Amosson/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Gray/HOU/EES@EES, Alisa Petteway/HOU/EES@EES, April
Self/HOU/EES@EES, Ashley Lord/HOU/EES@EES, Karen E Campos/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bernie Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cheryl
White/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Belinda McGaughy/EWC/Enron@ENRON,
Ann Vaughn/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leesa Hutcherson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Roger
Sumlin/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary Buck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia
Hankamer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Irma Alvarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne
Labbe/NA/Enron@Enron, Ramona Perkins/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Hill/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Shanna Funkhouser/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Norma
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron, Francisco
deJesus/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janet De La Paz/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn Doucet/CAL/ECT@ECT, Amy FitzPatrick/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Gerry Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Margo Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
Perry/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Willie Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Carmen Pokluda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wanda
Chalk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, johnpa@nepco.com,
robinj@nepco.com, Trang Dinh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Hargrave/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd
Migliore/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Jordan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nigel
Sellens/LON/ECT@ECT, Kate Whyte/LON/ECT@ECT, Robin L
Treadwell/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Hargrave/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trang
Dinh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Migliore/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, Dave
Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Drew C Lynch/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janie Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Miguel Padron/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Scott Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ranendra
Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Willie
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Cockrell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Teresa
Bosien/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gwendolyn Gray/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Neal/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jonathan Lane/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roy Montgomery/NA/Enron@ENRON, Emil
Campos/NA/Enron@Enron, Erin Kanouff/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Teri Ashley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roy Jacob/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Bundscho/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lionese York/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Wimberley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elspeth Inglis/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lon
Allchin/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rocio Barela/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: PEP Happy Hour

We invite you to have a drink with us to celebrate the end!

       When : Wednesday, December 20th
       Where: Hyatt Regency - The Park Bar
       Time :   5:00 - 8:00pm

Please RSVP by Tuesday, December 19th
Please forward this on to anyone I might have missed!


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Mike Banville" <mbanville@CERA.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	vkamins@enron.com
Subject:	CERAWeek Online Premium Access

Mr. Vincent J. Kaminski
Managing Director
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

Dear Mr. Kaminski:

Due to recent events, CERA realizes that some clients may not be able to
attend CERAWeek 2002 this coming February in Houston, Texas.  In light
of this reality, I wanted to make sure you are aware of CERAWeek
Online--a new web-based service offering that CERA has developed to help
your organization realize increased value from the energy industry's
preeminent gathering of thought leaders and visionaries.

CERAWeek Online will deliver a comprehensive online experience of the
CERAWeek proceedings, featuring daily highlights and interviews with
speakers, live simulcasts of keynote and plenary sessions, on-demand
access to a wide variety of sessions, and online briefings by CERA
experts delivered via the web in an easy to use format.  Much of this
content is available only through CERAWeek Online.

To provide an experience that clients can share broadly across their
organization, we are offering this enhanced coverage via CERA.com on an
enterprise-wide basis only.  The fee for this Premium Level access is
$5,000 per client enterprise. In addition, we are offering a 20%
discount to organizations that enroll by Friday, December 31, 2001.

To enroll your organization, or to view a complete description and
sample clips of the CERAWeek Online deliverables, please visit
http://www.cera.com/mc?c=2804&p=1054 or contact me via telephone at +1
617 441 2611 or email at mbanville@cera.com with any further questions
or considerations.

Regards,

Michael Banville
CERA Director

P.S. Enroll your organization by December 31, 2001 and receive a 20%
discount on Premium Level access.

*****************************************************************
Our relationship with you is very important to us.  Should you prefer
not to receive future e-mail notifications, please send a reply to
this message with "DoNotEmail" as the subject of your message.
( mailto:info@cera.com?subject=DoNotEmail )h
*****************************************************************


John,
	I will have my cell with me until Saturday the 22nd.  713-569-4684.  From the 22-29th please reach me at 781-830-9199.  I will be out of the country but checking in at that number.  I will call you tonight to make sure that this information has made it to you.   Thanks-Jeb


Good morning all!

Cheryl just called and has let me know that she will be in the office today around 11:30 am; she is not feeling well this morning.  If you should need anything, please feel free to contact me directly.

Keegan
Enron Wholesale Services
713-345-3317


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
 - Message From Boeing.pps


Attached is the Document Checklist Sherry put together.

Tammy


Bruce and Rob,

This is the latest from AA on what they want to see in an internal and external legal letter on Dabhol.  They now say they need both letters the earlier of 1) when they sign off on the 3rd Qtr 10-Q or 2) December 15, 2001.  Give me a call and we can discuss further.

Sommers

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	derick.e.smith@us.andersen.com@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, November 17, 2001 6:56 PM
To:	Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Subject:

For DPC letters...
---------------------- Forwarded by Derick E. Smith on 11/17/2001 06:30 PM
---------------------------

To:   Derick E. Smith@ANDERSEN WO
cc:
Date: 11/17/2001 06:14 PM
From: Sheila L. Poole, Houston 711 Louisiana, VPN 237 / 5405 OR DIRECT 713
      237 5405
Subject:

Here is the Dabhal legal letter wording.l
Sheila

(See attached file: Dabhal Legal Letter Wording.doc)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
 - Dabhal Legal Letter Wording.doc


Have a great holiday!


Approved.

 . . .and it wasn't a big deal - you're still debt-free.

:)

Dave

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 05/11/2000 12:16 PM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: ETA Amendment-Diamond-Koch L.P.

Attached is the form of ETA Amendment we executed with Koch Energy Trading.
The referenced Diamond Shamrock/Koch joint venture would like to execute the
same one.  Is this OK with you.

Forever in your debt...Tana


Privileged and Confidential - For Instruction of
Counsel                                                 Attached is a revised
copy of the Background note discussed earlier this week.  The revisions are
based on comments  from Frontier Economics and GPC, and further reflection by
Rob Hemstock and myself. I have also attached the  raw calculations from
Frontier that underlie several of the revisions.  I have not  sent the
revised document to outside counsel for review.


With respect to your inquiry as to whether there was any assignment executed
with respect to the assignment of the Howard trades to TXU, I looked in the
file and it appears that Susan Bailey in our Group prepared an Assignment and
Termination Agreement which she passed on the Brant Reves in Credit on 1/6/00
for handling.  There is no record of this assignment ever being executed in
our records.


I didn't redact it, but Ben might have a copy.  I can email you the
electronic file of the intact document.

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/16/2001 01:54 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: E-Next Generation Docs

Thanks!  I really could use a copy of the Blue Dog contract, especially if
you redacted it to give out to bidders.  Thanks!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	03/16/2001 11:53 AM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: E-Next Generation Docs

I'll have to send the notice separately.

John's number is 713 751-3254.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 11:53
AM ---------------------------
From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/17/2001 02:47 PM
To: kwiemer@milbank.com, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: E-Next Generation Docs

Attached are the documents that you asked me to change the signature line:


-----Original Message-----
From: Walton, Steve
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 5:53 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Comnes, Alan; Frank, Robert; Mara, Susan
Cc: Kean, Steven J.
Subject: RE: Materials for Western Governors

My assignments are enclosed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dernehl, Ginger On Behalf Of Shapiro, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:32 AM
To: Walton, Steve; Comnes, Alan; Frank, Robert; Mara, Susan
Cc: Kean, Steven J.
Subject: FW: Materials for Western Governors
Importance: High

Governor Jim Geringer of Wyoming is in the process of organizing a meeting between himself, 3-4 other western governors, and FERC Commissioner Pat Wood to discuss wholesale electricity issues facing the Western Power Market.  This meeting is expected to take place in the next couple of weeks.

In preparation of the meeting, Governor Geringer has requested information on the following issues which I would like each of you to provide me by next Tuesday, September 4th.

General Summary of the Western Power Market as it exists today - Steve Walton
A summary of Enron's position on the FERC RTO Model and the necessary components of a well-designed RTO - Steve Walton
A summary of FERC's Price Cap Order and the implications it has had on the West - Alan Comnes
An update of the Refund proceedings and next steps - Bob Frank
Summary of FERC's failure to go after California for failure to comply with FERC - Sue Mara
Update of CALISO issues - Sue Mara

Thank you


Brian,

The last class + plus a few days (depending on when I have
to submit the grades).

Vince

"Brian Corbett Nelson" <nelsonb@hydrant.ruf.rice.edu> on 04/11/2001 03:35:14 PM
Please respond to <nelsonb@rice.edu>
To:	<Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	RE: Term Project:

Mr. Kaminski,

I had an interview last Thusday in Dallas and could not attend class.  Did
you set a project deadline?

Thanks,
Brian Nelson

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3:22 PM
To: isranir@rice.edu; demianen@rice.edu; tbal93@yahoo.com;
maue@rice.edu; loughrid@rice.edu; jblantonjr@yahoo.com;
gjohnson@rice.edu; emchombo@rice.edu; nazareth@rice.edu;
vanstone@rice.edu; ganguzza@rice.edu; nelsonb@rice.edu;
sssmith@rice.edu; wheelock@rice.edu; westmore@rice.edu;
gaudette@rice.edu; otaylor@rice.edu; dikeman@rice.edu; jettke@rice.edu;
litton@rice.edu; chilkina@rice.edu; helms@rice.edu; wankhade@rice.edu;
monfan@rice.edu; kostya@rice.edu; pcp@rice.edu; yueguo@rice.edu;
nlwbio@rice.edu; zhangn@rice.edu; rishad@rice.edu; yoshiura@rice.edu;
howard@rice.edu; dayangd@rice.edu; wuwei@rice.edu; so@rice.edu;
wooddy@rice.edu; lamas@rice.edu; tbalestrery@houston.rr.com;
hingoran@rice.edu; planck@rice.edu
Cc: vkaminski@aol.com; Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com;
Jason.Sokolov@enron.com
Subject: Term Project:

This is the list of projects for the members of the "quant" team.
If you are working on different project, please, ignore this message.

Please, develop in a spreadsheet solutions/examples for the following:

1. Black-Scholes formula
2. Black's formula
3. Develop a spreadsheet to simulate price trajectory using:
     a. GBM
     b. GBM + jump (Formula 2.16 in the book, Figure 2.7)
     c. Mean reversion + jump (Formula 2.17, Figure 2.8)
4. Schwartz Single Factor Model (Formula 6.12)
5. Develop models corresponding to the Figures 7.1, 7.3, 7.5, 7.6, 7.8

Vince


Thanks.  I'll try to get to this tonight or in the morning.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Jorge A Garcia@ENRON
	04/04/2001 06:48 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Annex II

Per our discussion regarding distinguishing and Adjustment. I have added
under the "Adjustments/IPA's" section of Annex I that (*Denotes an
Adjustment").

Looking forward to speaking with you in the morning.

Thanks again!

Regards,

Jorge


The president named Pedro Parente as the Energy  Czar yesterday to coordinate
the rationing crisis and develop short and medium term solutions for the
sector. Rumors are that the Aneel directors will be replaced.  Mauro Arce,
Sao Paulo state energy secretary will also be on the coordination team with
the Mines and Energy minister.  We have very strong personal relationships
with both Parente and Arce and I have been invited to participate as one of
the private sector repesentatives.  We are scheduling a call with your
assistants for an update.

See attached:
Official Admits Government Underestimated Energy Crisis
Government officials Thursday opted to create a special interministerial
group to
address Brazil,s current energy crisis.
Cabinet head Pedro Parente, who will coordinate the group, made the
announce-ment
and also admitted that the situation is more serious than originally thought.
His
comment seemed addressed at strongly worded criticisms by business leaders who
have charged that the government failed to act in time to deal with the
crisis.
The head of the infrastructure department of the S?o Paulo State Federation of
Industries (Fiesp), Pio Gavazzi, warned that industry could not support an
energy cut
of over 6%. Any reduction above this level would have "catastrophic results,"
Gavazzi
said.
Fiesp research and statistics director Clarice Messer added that the
rationing would
stop the expansion of jobs in S?o Paul industry, which began last year.
According to
Messer, 13,000 new jobs would not be created in the second semester as a
result of
the energy cuts.


Here are my responses:

1. Development fee is a commercial question.  This will need to be vetted
with Herman if we go with it.  Personally, I'd skip it and push to sign next
week.

2.  I have a call in to Dale.

3.  No LLC.  Kathleen will handle.  The closer the creation is to the signing
of the letter, the better, taking into account the time required to get the
docs back and set up.  Someone needs to name it.  We should also look at a
minimal list of officers.

4.  I don't have the attachment in front of me, so I will have to look it
up.  I'll get back to you.  The concept is that ENA is only responsible for
changes in the amounts owed to GE as of the closing date.  I thought the
language was awkward, and tried to make it more clear, but obviously failed!
As soon as I get the break out contract from Dale we can check on the
definitional questions. It SHOULD be the same as in the CA breakout contract
with GE, but I won't make that assumption.  Drop dead date on put/call Dec.
2002.

5. This needs to be discussed with Ben.

6.  This should be set up as a  new matter, since these aren't the Blue Dog
turbines. You can send the bill to Sheila with a copy to me.

I'll open the doc and take a look at it asap.

Kay

From: Carlos Sole on 03/05/2001 05:59 PM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com, kay.mann@enron.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com
cc:

Subject: Issues List for LLC Documents with Panda Energy and Delta

Apologies to Carolyn for the repeated misspellings below.

----- Forwarded by Carlos Sole/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 05:59 PM -----

	Carlos Sole
	03/05/2001 05:55 PM

		 To: kay.mann@enron.com
		 cc: ccampbell@kslaw.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com
		 Subject: Issues List for LLC Documents with Panda Energy and Delta

Kay, as I told you, Carolyn put out a set of intial draft documents and we
debriefed Jake and Stephen.  Based on our meeting, Carolyn was going to make
certain revisions based on the answers to the questions below and certain
other items we raised during our meeting.  Nevertheless, your input is
required on the following:

1.  We have discussed eliminating the payment of a development fee, which if
Delta /  Panda were to breach its obligations prior to the funding of the
Escrow would be non-refundable and serve as a form of liquidated damages.
Commercially the inclination is to avoid that fee, we need to confirm that
approach.

2.  We need to interface with Dale Rasmussen on the status of the break out
contract and how quickly it can be incorporated into the form of Facility
Agreement that would be part of our transaction.

3.  Have we established an LLC that will be sold for this project.

4.  Please see Caroline's questions 6, 7 and 13 below.

5.  Please see faxes that I left on your chair on the broker issue and
whether we need to respond in writing.  Sheila Tweed's position was not to.

6.  John asked whether K&S should open a separate subfile or include the time
charged within the Blue Dog file?

Thanks and we'll talk tomorrow.

----- Forwarded by Carlos Sole/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 05:46 PM -----

	Jake Thomas@ECT
	03/05/2001 02:34 PM

		 To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Initial Draft of LLC Documents with Panda Energy

See Comments in Red Below

Stephen Thome
03/05/2001 12:23 PM
To: Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Initial Draft of LLC Documents with Panda Energy

Jake,

Do you want to make suggestions with regard to #3, #7, #13

Please advise of the following additional information in order that we may
complete
the enclosed documents:

1.  Full name of Panda Energy; Panda Energy International, Inc. Don't we have
two sets of doc's going out ?  The other would be for Delta Power Company LLC
2.  Type of entity of Panda Energy (this affects the representations in
Section 3.2.1 et seq. of the LLC Agreement);  Privately held company
3.  Name of the new LLC formed by ENA;  Salmon Street Energy? Spawn Energy
LLC ? (I'm totally indifferent
4.  Date of organization of the new LLC;
5.  Purchase Price payable by Panda;  $65,800,000.00 ($68,000,000.00) What
would ENA's 20% interest be valued at?
6.  Section 5(a) - there is a substantive question as to what ENA is
responsible for in connection with the Turbine Contract (I included in
brackets the alternative that was originally in the prototype document and
also the alternative as modified by Kay Mann);
7.  Outside date after which either party could terminate if transaction is
not closed;  7 April 2001?
8.   Date of confidentiality agreement;
9.  Identity of any broker used by Panda or ENA; Tom Young (I don't know if
he represents a brokerage firm).NOT!!!10.  Address for notice to Panda;

4100 Spring Valley, Suite 1001
Dallas, Texas 75244

11.  Confirmation that Purchase Amount is defined in the Turbine Contract;
12.  Confirmation that Commercial Operation is defined in the Turbine
Contract; and
13.  Date of automatic right to put or call the LLC interest.


Ken Lay speaking, and James J. Hoecker


Deer All:

Keith, great looking buck! Chris, I can't believe you passed that deer up.
Very generous.

Chad shot a nice 10 point. Very impressive hunt. He hunted boneyard in the
morning, then hopped the fence into the robertson pasture and rattled the
deer withing 10 yards or so and managed to connect on a running shot as the
deer bolted away.

I fed my Python a gobbler at LoneStar. Then shot a solid schlocho at the
Hole sunday morning.

Pictures forthcoming.

Joe's beginner's honeymoon has come to an end. He saw nothing decent
everywhere he went.

Brian saw an impressive young 9 pt at booger. Jim videotaped it the next
morning. 21" wide or so, short tines. Very tempting deer, but all agreed
that it was 4.5 and should go another year.

Dogs could not find Jim's deer. Dogs headed from last blood due south to
fence at highway.

Feeders are all in good shape, except Boneyard. It is running at 7 and 4:30.
But weak. Chris indicated it needed a bigger battery. We considered putting
a magnum on it, but if all it needs is a new battery, we'll leave it to you.
We should get it running well, lots of deer in that area. One good schlocho
and a bladed spike that needs to be shot. I put a new battery in Lonestar
and we filled it up. Booger topped off with motor run time increased. 30-30
was empty. We filled it up. Pig filled up an run time increased. We have
lots of corn, so if a feeder is not dropping lots of corn, turn up the spin
time and keep em full. Dropping extra corn also worked well at mesquite and
showtime..
Mertz will feed protien next week. I consulted with Chris and houston boys
openning weekend regarding mertz offer to let us buy extra protien this
fall, since he had met the quota. We agreed to see what he would feed but
cap it at $500, spread across the board.

Looks like Houston boys will be retruning December 15th weekend and closing
weekend. I'll be bringing Henry on next trip and think it would be great if
Keitha nd boys would be there too.

Hope Keith and Jim can make it back as soon as possible. We winterized
trailer on way out. Keg almost empty.

e.

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Have you talked to my or given me Equitable file yet?  I cannot remember it
if you have!  Mary
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 12:23 PM -----

	Russell Diamond
	08/09/2000 11:34 AM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: More ISDA issues

Mary,

According to Sara, you are handling the WPS and Equitable ISDA's.  Can you
please give me an update on the WPS draft.  I should have the Equitable
issues resolved this afternoon, and will let you know what the outcome is at
that time.

Thanks again,

Russell


This e-mail will confirm the site visit by your company at LV Cogen I & II.
The relevant information is as follows:

	LV Cogen
Site Visit Date	Monday, October 16, 2000
Site Visit Time	1:30 PM to 5:30 PM
Directions to Hotels/Site	See DealBench - LV Cogen (Section V through End) Due Diligence
List/Plant Pictures Section
Meeting Time/Place	Las Vegas Cogen
	1701 East Alexander Road
	North Las Vegas, NV  89030

	Meet Bill Williams at 1:30 PM
Enron Site Visit Coordinator	Bill Williams
	503.464.8958 (O)
	503.704.9801(M)
	bill.williams@enron.com
Enron Site Visit Team	Bill Williams
	Dan Hammonds
	Mark Mullen
	Plant Manager
	Plant Engineer

Pursuant to the Site Visit Procedures sent you by CSFB, if you have not
already done so, please send me the following:
List of your team members and titles
For outside consultants, state their employer
Name, phone number (office and mobile) and e-mail address of your designated
deal team leader

Lastly, I will serve as the due diligence coordinator for LV Cogen I & II,
handling all questions and responses.  Should you have any due diligence
questions or require copies of any oversized documents, please contact me at
713.345.8992.


Return-Path: <Gregory_Gordon@ssrn.com>
Received: from  rly-xd03.mx.aol.com (rly-xd03.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.168])
by air-xd05.mail.aol.com (v77.14) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:57:06 -0500
Received: from  zeus.ssrn.com (zeus.ssrn.com [38.202.236.235]) by
rly-xd03.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:56:51 -0500
Received: from ssrn.com ([38.202.236.235]) by zeus.ssrn.com
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-61092U100L2S100V35)          with
SMTP id com; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:56:50 -0500
Subject: Successful purchase of NBER Paper
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:56:49 -0500
From: Gregory_Gordon@ssrn.com (Gregory_Gordon)
To: <vkaminski@aol.com>
CC:
Message-ID: <20001210155650048.AAA365@zeus.ssrn.com@ssrn.com>
X-Mailer: Unknown

Dear Wincenty Kaminski:

Thank you for your purchase at Social Science Research Network.  Your
credit card has been charged $ 5.00.  This charge will appear on your
statement as Social Science Electronic Publishing, our parent company.
The confirmation number for this transaction is NBER_103397 and a
summary of your order is below.

If you have any questions about this charge please email
Mailto:NBERSupport@ssrn.com for assistance.

If you have any comments or suggestions about how SSRN can improve this
service, please let me know at Mailto:Gregory_Gordon@ssrn.com.

Thank you,
Gregory Gordon
President

ORDER INFORMATION
================================
Diagnosing Market Power in California's Restructured Wholesale
Electricity Market
NBER Collection
Borenstein / Bushnell / Wolak

BILLING INFORMATION
================================
Wincenty Kaminski
1400 Smith
Houston, TX 77002
USA
713 853 3848


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Guzman/PDX/ECT on 12/12/2000 02:31
PM ---------------------------

Carla Hoffman
12/12/2000 12:18 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Matt
Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Guzman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark
Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DJ US Energy Secretary Warns Pwr Producers In West On Prices

---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/12/2000 12:27
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/12/2000 11:14 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ US Energy Secretary Warns Pwr Producers In West On Prices

18:59 GMT 12 December 2000 DJ US Energy Secretary Warns Pwr Producers In
West On Prices
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--As California's electricity system teeters on the
brink of collapse, U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson warned power
producers not to attempt to take advantage of the power-supply crisis.
"I am very concerned about the condition of power markets in the West.
Electricity supplies in parts of the region are tight and prices charged for
wholesale power in the region continue to spiral out of control," Richardson
said in a press release late Monday.
Richardson urged power providers not to attempt to take advantage of the
crisis by price gouging.
"While I have no specific knowledge of any such activities, it is important
that generators located throughout the region and in Canada and Mexico
understand that the administration won't tolerate any actions designed to
take advantage of the situation," Richardson said.
The energy secretary criticized a decision by Kaiser Aluminum Corp. (KLU) to
shut down an aluminum smelter in the Pacific Northwest that receives
low-cost power from the Bonneville Power Administration and resell that
power in open markets for a profit of $52 million.
"I have instructed Bonneville to explore all necessary actions to prevent
Kaiser from remarketing this power," Richardson said.

   -By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6647; bryan.lee@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires 12-12-00
1859GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


Teco Tap       115.000 / HPL IFERC ; 10.000 / Enron

Texoma         0

LS HPL LSK          30.000 / Enron


No.  I'll let this one go.

Thanks,

Grigsby


Bob as discussed.

Green Energy LLC
Attn: Gloria Salazar
Fax # 915-685-7021

CONFIRMATION AGREEMENT

ENFOLIO FIRM CONFIRMATION--ENFOLIO GAS PURCHASE AGREEMENT GOVERNS

May 1, 2001

This Confirmation shall confirm the Transaction agreed to on the date hereof
and binding between Greene Energy LLC ("Customer") and Enron North America
Corp. ("Company") regarding the purchase and sale of gas pursuant to the
Enfolio Gas Purchase Agreement dated May 1, 2001 (the &Agreement8).  Company
to purchase and receive (Buyer) and Customer to sell and deliver (Seller).

TRANSACTION NUMBER:
DESIGNATED QUANTITY (IN MMBTUS):  100% of Seller's Daily Production
DELIVERYPOINT(S):ColumbiaGasTransmissionCorp.(AppalachiaW.Va.OhioKy.)
PERIOD OF DELIVERY:  May 1, 2001 through May 31, 2001
CONTRACT PRICE (PER MMBTU):  The Contract Price shall be the Daily Midpoint
price published on each calendar day during the period of delivery under the
heading "Daily Price Survey" in the Appalachia - Columbia, App section of Gas
Daily, Less $.01 for 100% of daily production.

This Confirmation is being provided pursuant to and in accordance with the
ENFOLIO AGREEMENT and constitutes part of and is subject to all of the
provisions of the Agreement.  Any objection of Customer to this Confirmation
must be made by written notice to Company prior to the Confirm Deadline.

Each party shall not disclose the terms of this transaction to a third party
(other than the party's and its affiliates' employees, lenders, counsel,
accountants or prospective purchasers of any rights under any Transactions
who have agreed to keep such terms confidential) except in order to comply
with any applicable law, order, regulation or exchange rule; provided, each
party shall notify the other party of any proceeding of which it is aware
which may result in disclosure and use reasonable efforts to prevent or limit
the disclosure.  The provisions of the Agreement other than the terms of this
transaction are not subject to this confidentiality obligation.  The parties
shall be entitled to all remedies available at law or in equity to enforce,
or seek relief in connection with, this confidentiality obligation; provided,
all monetary damages shall be limited to actual direct damages.

 &CUSTOMER8         &COMPANY8
            Greene Energy
LLC                                                               Enron North
America Corp.

By:_____________________________      By:______________________________
Title:___________________________       Title:_____________________________

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


THE WALL STREET JOURNAL / CALIFORNIA

Critics Seek
More Control
Over ISO
By Marc Lifsher

08/09/2000
The Wall Street Journal
Page CA1
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Some people want the California Independent System Operator to be a lot less
independent.
The Folsom-based nonprofit corporation, which acts as the traffic cop for the
state's electricity grid, has been a lightning rod for criticism during this
summer's power crisis. Though generally praised for keeping lights on in the
face of severe shortages of electricity, the ISO has come under fire for
failing to move more quickly to lower the maximum price it will pay
generators for emergency power to meet demand and prevent blackouts.
Pressure on the ISO has eased considerably since last week, when its
governing board voted to lower the cap on such same-day, emergency purchases
-- the only type of pricing it has the power to affect directly -- to $250 a
megawatt hour from $500. But the heat hasn't been turned off completely. Some
lawmakers still are calling for changes in the 26-member ISO board, which
includes people nominated by power generators, utilities, middlemen, and
commercial and residential customers, among others. The critics want to
streamline the board and make it more accountable to the state's elected
officials.
The ISO was created by the state's 1996 utility-deregulation act to transmit
electricity smoothly between generators and utilities. Lawmakers devised the
independent board as a way to give the various "stakeholders" -- generators,
utilities, middlemen, customers and environmentalists -- a say in how energy
is supplied. Members serve for up to three years.
"It's inappropriate for the ISO governing board to vote on issues that
benefit them financially," says Sen. Dede Alpert, a Coronado Democrat. She
questions the wisdom of allowing out-of-state energy sellers and marketers to
sit on the ISO board and vote on emergency prices, especially when they have
an interest in keeping those prices high.
Sen. Alpert spent much of the Legislature's recent summer recess fielding
complaints about high electricity costs from her constituents, customers of
San Diego Gas & Electric Co., a unit of San Diego-based Sempra Energy. Last
summer, SDG&E became the first investor-owned utility in the state to have
price regulations fully lifted. This summer, its rates have doubled, as high
temperatures and power shortages have swept the West.
In response to a series of price spikes in Southern California and the wider
contention that skyrocketing prices indicate the failure of deregulation,
state lawmakers have scheduled a joint hearing tomorrow in Sacramento. High
on the agenda: possible changes in the ISO's governing structure and scrutiny
of the way it handles power statewide on hot days. Critics say emergency
purchases should be no more than 5% of electric-power sales, but were as high
as 33% of the market on hot days earlier this summer.
Key legislative leaders -- including Sen. Steve Peace, an El Cajon Democrat
who was the architect of the 1996 deregulation law -- would like to make the
ISO more accountable to state elected officials.
Possible changes include preventing industry representatives with conflicts
from sitting on the ISO board, as well as abolishing the ISO entirely and
shifting its responsibilities back to state utilities, under the supervision
of the state Public Utilities Commission. Until 1996, the PUC regulated all
electric utility rates and services.
ISO board members say legislative critics are unfairly focusing anger over
the price spikes on the ISO, which has only a limited ability to set prices.
Most electricity isn't sold through the same-day, emergency market -- but
through long-term contracts between sellers and utilities, or at least a day
in advance through the California Power Exchange, which is a nonprofit
corporation established by the 1996 law to serve as a trading floor.
"We need to create a government structure that is not susceptible to pressure
from one state senator or anyone else," to keep prices artificially low, says
ISO Chairman Jan Smutney-Jones, who represents the Independent Energy
Producers Association, the trade group for non-utility power generators. He
dismisses criticism of the board's out-of-state members. There needs to be
"an independent, interstate board" because energy is transmitted across state
lines, he says. Two Houston-based power sellers on the board, Dynegy Corp.
and Enron Corp., deny any conflict. Chuck Watson, Dynegy's chairman and chief
executive, blames state officials for expanding the ISO's role to include
monitoring prices. "If there's any finger-pointing," Mr. Watson says, "they
probably should start with the big finger pointed right at them."
Substantial restructuring of ISO governance could prove difficult. The state,
through the governor-appointed Electricity Oversight Board, has limited power
to make changes. Past efforts by the Oversight Board to exert control didn't
go far.
Last year, state lawmakers tried to give the Oversight Board the power to
confirm or reject ISO board members to make them accountable to state
officials. (Nominees had previously gone on automatically.) The effort was
opposed by officials of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in
Washington, D.C., which argued that the state couldn't have veto power over
the nominees of out-of-state power producers. In a compromise, California
officials were given authority to veto half the board -- those nominated by
residential, industrial, commercial and agricultural power-users.
The federal energy commission has final regulatory authority over the ISO and
has viewed state attempts to meddle with the agency as an unconstitutional
attempt to hinder interstate commerce.
Any proposed changes in ISO's governing structure "would be looked at very
closely by FERC," says ISO attorney Richard Jacobs.
This summer, the ISO board displayed an independence that was annoying to
state lawmakers. In June, Sen. Peace called on the board to lower its price
cap for emergency purchases, from $750 a megawatt hour (roughly the amount of
electricity needed to power 1,000 homes) to $250. The board responded by
lowering the cap to $500 a megawatt hour. A second attempt to lower the cap
to $250 failed to get a majority vote.
The reason? The three private power-seller representatives, including the
Independent Energy Producers Association, were joined by those representing
agricultural, industrial and commercial users in opposing a lowering of the
cap.
Then, the pressure on the ISO board really intensified. Gov. Gray Davis
weighed in, by sending the ISO board a letter asking it to lower the cap "to
the lowest possible level." Energy Secretary Bill Richardson ordered the
representative of federal-public-power sellers to change his vote from no to
yes. A consumer representative from the League of Women Voters also moved to
the "aye" column, allowing the cap to be lowered to $250.
Lowering the cap removes some of the rate pressure on residential and
commercial consumers in San Diego -- and takes some of the heat off the ISO
board. But not entirely: A Public Utilities Commission report on the state's
electricity market that was sent to the governor after the vote said that the
members of the ISO and the Power Exchange boards "can have serious conflicts
of interest" and that both organization aren't "accountable to the state or
its consumers."
An ISO spokesman said the board is in the process of producing a formal
response to the report and it declined to comment. A spokesman for the Power
Exchange said that it has followed the law regarding conflicts and that it
does protect consumers.
---


Hello --

Here is a better version of the initial Offline contact list.  We will update
this as we proceed.  Best regards.

-- Rex


because i want to go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

to ny?  why?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i think you should go soon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

why is that rude.  it's not by my choice

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

youre rude

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok.  i might not be here by the time i am supposed to go to ny, but i guess you can keep thinking that.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

you can answer me in ny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:06 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i'll have to think about it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:04 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

im still wating for one

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:03 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i guess we'll see.  so what was my answer to your proposal?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yep

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

um nope.  are you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

havent you learned yet im always right

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i hope that you are right.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:59 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

youre not going anywhere

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

um ok.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nope, and stop

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:54 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

isn't that being too nice?  so i am freaking out about my job again.


A woman was sitting at a bar enjoying an after-work cocktail with
her girlfriends when an exceptionally tall, handsome, extremely
sexy young man entered. He was so striking that the woman could
not take her eyes away from him. The young man noticed her overly-attentive
stare and walked directly toward her. Before she could
offer her apologies for being so rude for staring, the young man
said to her. "I'll do anything, absolutely anything,
that you want me to do, no matter how kinky, for $20. on one condition."

Flabbergasted, the woman asked what the condition was. The young man
replied, "You have to tell me what you want me to do in just three words."

The woman considered his proposition for a moment, withdrew from
her purse and - slowly counted out four $5 bill, which she
pressed into the young man's hand along with her address. She
looked deeply into his eyes, and
s l o w l y, meaningfully said .......

"CLEAN MY HOUSE."

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


The contact name is Jack Wells, and his phone number is (281) 293-6030. Would
you like me to enter this info into the deals?

Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
01/29/2001 08:23 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: conoco deals #506549.01, 506550.01, 506551.01

hi kate,
these sean crandall deals need contacts.  can you please get a good contact
name (and phone #) and i will put in a gcp request to have it added to the
drop down list in deal entry.
i'm too lazy to press the shift key lately, sorry -no caps.
thanks for your help!
kim


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000
10:01 AM ---------------------------

"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com> on 08/14/2000 08:38:36 AM
To: "'Chad.Landry@enron.com'" <Chad.Landry@enron.com>,
"'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Booty Call Agreement

Ice!

THE PRE-BOOTY CALL AGREEMENT
>>> > This pre-booty call agreement (hereinafter referred to as the
>>>"Agreement")
>>> > is
>>> > entered into on the _____ day of __________, 2000, by
>>> > _______________________, between ____________ and ______________.
>>>THIS AGREEMENT SHALL COVER THE FOLLOWING RULES AND PRINCIPLES:
>>>1. No sleeping over -- unless it is very good and we need to repeat
>>> it in the morning.
>>>
>>>2. No meeting in public except for dinner or drinks before the
>>> events of the evening.
>>>
>>>3. No calls before 9 PM -- we don't have shit to talk about.
>>>
>>>4. None of that "lovemaking" shit -- only mind-blowing sex allowed.
>>>
>>>5. No emotional discussions -- Ex.: Where are we heading with this?
>>> Do you love me? The answer is no, so don't ask.
>>>
>>>6. No plans made in advance -- that is why you are called the
>>> "backup," unless you are from out-of-town, then it's only a one-
>>>time advanced arrangement.
>>>
>>>7. All gifts excepted -- money is always good.
>>>
>>>8. No baby talk -- however, dirty talk is encouraged.
>>>
>>>9. No asking for comparisons with former lovers -- it's really none
>>> of your damn business.
>>>
>>>10. No calling each other "friends with privileges" -- we are not
>>> friends, just sex buddies.
>>>
>>>11. Calling out the wrong name during sex is OK -- don't be
>>> offended.
>>>
>>>12. No extra clothing -- I don't want your ass leaving anything
>>> behind when you leave.
>>>
>>>13. No falling asleep right after sex -- it's over, so get your ass
>>> up and go home.
>>>
>>>14. Don't be offended if I don't ask if you enjoyed it -- I don't
>>> care.
>>>
>>>15. You cannot borrow my car for any reason.
>>>
>>>16. If anyone asks who you are, the standard response will be: "My
>>> roommate's girlfriend/boyfriend."
>>>
>>>17. Doggie style preferred -- just hit it hard and right or get the
>>> hell out!
>>>
>>>18. Reason for doggie style: the less eye contact the better. I
>>> don't want to look at you, just fuck you.
>>>
>>>19. We hook up absolutely whenever the mood strikes ME -- so don't
>>> keep calling.
>>>
>>>20. The most important one -- no condoms, no fucking. Carry your ass
>>> home.
>>>
>>>21. Bring your own drink -- I am not your liquor store.
>>>
>>>22. No phone use, please -- don't want anyone calling back looking
>>> for your ass.
>>>
>>>
>>> *** EXTRA TIP FOR SUCCESSFUL BOOTY CALLS***
>>>
>>> The aforementioned rules may only be altered by the holder of
>>> the agreement. If the other party attempts to change or alter any
>>> terms of this Agreement, it will automatically become null
>>> and void and you will then be removed from the BOOTY CALL LIST and
>>> deleted from phone memory and email list. BLOCKED from all
>>> communications until your silly ass understands the rules.
>>>
>>> Participating Party Signature_______________________________________
>>> Date:________________
>>>
>>> Participating Party Signature_______________________________________
>>> Date:________________


Pursuant to our conversation, the different scenarios for trades in dispute
are (and may not be limited to) the following:

Trade agreed Trade not booked    No confirm sent
Trade agreed Trade booked  Killed on T/D  No confirm sent
Trade agreed Trade booked  Killed after T/D  No confirm sent
Trade agreed Trade booked  Trade killed  Confirm sent

Trade booked Trade disputed     No Confirm sent
Trade booked  Trade disputed     Confirm sent

Examples:

Scenario 1: the CP calls back one hour after the trade was agreed and states
they now do not agree with the trade. Essentially, it could be disputed
wether or not we had a trade, even though our tapes support our position. No
impact on booking or Confirmation Desk.

Scenarios 2 and 3 occur essentially the same as Scenario 1 with the exception
that the trade is booked. Scenario 2 and 3 a different based on the pricing
implication of a trade booked overnight. In both these scenarios, we should
consider issuing a Termination Agreement which gives some reference to the
details of the agreed transaction.

Scenario 4 is the most straight-forward. An agreed trade, booked and
Confirmed, we issue a Termination Agreement.

Scenarios 5 and 6 are different from Scenarios 2 and 3 in that we have booked
a trade based on our understanding, but OUR understanding of the terms was
incorrect. The two scenarios are different in that in 5 a Confirmation is not
sent. In 5, we should consider issuing a side letter stating that a trade was
booked in error and no such trade exists. In 6 we should consider issuing a
side letter stating the trade was booked AND the Confirmation was sent in
error - and ask that they return the Confirmation.


Parking Rate Changes Effective 1-1-2001 (created by Enron
Announcements/Corp/Enron on 11/6/2000)