Harry, I think we finally have everything done on our side.  Would you give me your phone number and address and we will mail you the GISB.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Gregory, Harry" <Harry.Gregory@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3:06 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: BASE CONTRACT FOR SHORT-TERM

Chris, I need to also send you a copy of our Special Provisions to the GISB,
they are forth coming.

Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Gregory, Harry
Subject: RE: BASE CONTRACT FOR SHORT-TERM

Got it.

Thanks

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Gregory, Harry" <Harry.Gregory@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:39 PM
   To:     Germany, Chris
   Subject:  BASE CONTRACT FOR SHORT-TERM

   ******************************************************************
   This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
   Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
   use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
   If you have received this email in error please notify the
   sender.
   ******************************************************************
    - Doc1.doc << File: Doc1.doc >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Per Steve Kean, attached please find a filing at FERC that includes an
appendix identifying market abuses.

Please let me know if you experience any difficulties with the file.

Regards,
Elizabeth Linnell


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 10:09 AM -----

	Susan Bailey
	06/30/2000 09:10 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ENA Financial Trading Forms

Carol,

Attached is a list of the current forms used by ENA.  The list also includes
where the form can be located.

Let me know if additional forms should be included.

Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Somehow, I have found myself volunteering to be a United Way Campaigner for
the year 2000.   My best determination, of why I volunteered (not being a
volunteer by nature), is that I believe that the United Way is one of the
"Lifelines" critical to the quality of life, and life itself, for many in our
community.  You may not know, that the United Way Agencies help one out of
every two people living in our community.   When I discovered this fact, I
was astonished at the needs of our community.  I believe that I had become
complacent, surrounding myself only with those fortunate enough to be
employed by a company like Enron.

With knowledge of the needs of my community, I can no longer, in good
conscience, be complacent.  I hope that each of you will join me, and others
in the Enron organization, in making a contribution or pledge to the United
Way.  I am not an "Enforcer"; I have however, by accepting the role of a
Campaigner, become a "Tracker" of contributions.  I am not concerned with the
level of your contribution ( in fact, I will never know the amount of your
contribution), but I do wish for you to join me in support of less fortunate
members of our community.  No amount is too small.........
A $25 Donation provides four families with a weeks worth of food!

Enron's goal is to have 100% of its employees reach out and make at least a
minimal contribution.  I share this goal for our group.  Won't you please
join me in this worthy effort.

Sincerely,
BNG

P.S.  This year, all pledges and contributions must be done by using the
computer system.  It is easy................ It has to be
easy...............Since I have already accomplished this task.

LOG-IN to system on Netscape or Explorer --unitedway.enron.com


Are you going?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Angela
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 7:09 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	FW: Welcome aboard, Angela!

i think the final installment.  I HAVE A JOB AND DID NOTHING TO GET IT!

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3817
Houston, Texas 77019
Tel: (713) 345-8347
Fax: (713) 646-3393
e-mail: angela.davis@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	timedecision@acninc.net@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, December 15, 2001 4:27 AM
To:	undisclosed-recipients:;@ENRON
Subject:	Welcome aboard, Angela!

________________________________________________________________
Hello Angela,

We are happy to inform you that you have met our qualifications and we are offering you a position with our company!
You will also be excited to know that we are going to compensate you not just for your efforts, but also on the efforts of each former Enron employee that you PERSONALLY assist in finding placement with our company!

As an additional bonus you will receive 2%-8% personal residual income for each customer you personally refer to our services, allowing you to over-ride the entire energy market in Texas, and that's just the beginning! There are additional bonuses in our compensation plan of which will be explained to you.

Angela, If you do not believe in GOD, you should start believing NOW! The magnitude of being able to essentially transfer companies along with your former employees can only be considered an ACT OF GOD.

This is a ONCE IN A LIFETIME opportunity to continue to work with the people you know and love, and NOT be affected economically by your recent layoff.

YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO WAIT.
We HIGHLY urge you to take advantage of this remarkable opportunity.

We will be hosting a special training Saturday, December 15th. The location of this spectacular event will be the Renaissance Hotel, 6 Greenway Plaza East.

Please meet your escorts in the hotel lobby by 9:45 a.m. as we will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. Your personal hosts will be Mr. Jared Radden and Ms. Rachel Blake.

Our goal is for you to help us make this one of the most successful and memorable events in history, to be known as a "Weekend To Remember"!

If there are any further questions, please address them by e-mail.
That address is: timedecision@acninc.net

Welcome aboard, and we look forward to seeing you OVER the top!

Thanks,

Jared Radden
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, click on the following URL:
http://tnp.ca/radden/unsub.cgi?e=angela.davis@enron.com&s=2


Outlined below is a summer supply deal with North Shore Gas:

Buyer:  North Shore Gas Company
Seller:  ENA
Location:  NGPL Amarillo Mainline Pool
Volume:  2,028 MMBtu/day
Term:  August, September 2000
Price:  IFGMR FOM NGPL Midcontinent Index Plus $0.04/MMBtu

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Cary


David,

What Australian laws besides the rules of the exchange would govern the
trades?


Please review the attached Links Report.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923


Hi Rosalee:
Steve asked that I forward this to you.  I believe that Steve left you a
voicemail describing the nature of the email.

All the best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 06:51 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 06:11 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 05:57 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 05:56 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Jim:
It was a pleasure speaking with you on Wednesday.  Based on our conversation,
this email includes the following:

An Enron contact to discuss developing small-scale generation on Tribal lands.

Our views on the impediments to distributed generation and suggestions on how
to remove those impediments.

A description of the credit issues that continue to impede DWR,s ability to
sign contracts with power suppliers, and options to resolve them. Two
possible options for addressing the credit issue are 1) a California PUC
order clarifying that DWR will recover its power purchase costs through
rates, and 2) an amendment to AB1X designed to accomplish the same goal.  I
have attached talking points regarding the California PUC order and proposed
amendments to AB1X.  We believe that an amendment to AB1X is the preferable
option.

Our assessment of the supply/demand picture in California.

Our suggestions for a legislative package designed to solve both the near-
and long-term electricity crisis in California.  We will deliver to your
office tomorrow detailed legislative language.  In those materials we will
also identify existing bills that we believe can easily accommodate our
proposed language.

I hope that the information is useful.  Please do not hesitate to contact me
if you would like to discuss these materials further, or if there is anything
else that I can do to assist you.

Regards,
Ken

Contact Information to Discuss Interest Expressed by Native American Tribes
in Installing Small-scale Generation on Tribal Lands

David Parquet, Vice-President
Enron North America
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415.782.7820
Fax: 415.782.7851

2. Key Barriers to Distributed Generation

Excessive and Unnecessary Utility Stand-by Charges

Solution: The executive orders issued by the Governor on February 14th took a
step in the right direction.  Utility stand-by charges have always been
designed by the utilities to protect their monopoly position, extract
monopoly prices from customers, or both.  But there is no reason to limit the
elimination of these charges to generation facilities that are less than
1MW.  These limits will only lengthen unnecessarily the time it takes for
California to close the significant gap between supply and demand and reduce
the risk of black outs this summer.  We would propose lifting the cap by
offering amendments to SB27X, which is designed to facilitate development of
distributed generation.

Excessive delays and costs related to interconnecting facilities with
investor-owned and municipal utilities

Solution:   The Governor,s executive order regarding interconnection is a
step in the right direction*D-D-26-01 requires utilities to complete
interconnection studies within 7 days.  California should ensure that this
requirement applies to all generation facilities, including distributed
generation.  In addition, the financial conflicts the utilities face when
interconnecting generation facilities are simply too powerful to overcome
through executive orders or other regulations.  To the greatest extent
possible, California should shift control over interconnection away from the
utility and place that control with the California ISO.  This could be
accomplished through amendments to SB 27X.

Permitting and Air Quality Issues
Developers of distributed (i.e., &on-site8) generation that is 50 MWs or
greater must receive certification from the California Energy Commission and
therefore face all of the impediments to development that large-scale
generation faces.

Solution: California should ensure that the executive orders (D-22-01 thru
D-26-01) issued by the Governor to expedite plant siting and maximize plant
output apply equally to smaller scale, &distributed generation8 facilities.
In addition, distributed generation that is less than 50 MWs continues to
face local opposition.  The State should ensure that local, parochial
interests cannot block otherwise beneficial distributed generation projects.
These objectives could be accomplished through amendments to SB27X.

3. Credit Concerns Regarding Authority Granted to DWR in AB1X to Purchase
Electricity on Behalf of the Utilities

Enron responded to the RFP issued by DWR to enter into power contracts with
suppliers.
Enron is in active discussions with DWR to establish contract terms with the
goal of entering into a power purchase agreement as soon as possible.
However, ambiguities contained in AB1X have created significant credit risk
concerns that need to be resolved in order to finalize contract terms.
We understand that the lion,s share of counterparties share Enron,s credit
risk concerns.
Enron has proposed several options for resolving the credit risk issues and
is working with DWR to arrive at a solution that is mutually agreeable to
both sides and that might serve as a template for power purchase agreements
going forward.

Summary of the Source of the Credit Risk Issue

Ambiguous Ratemaking Authority
The language in AB1X is ambiguous as to whether DWR has any authority to
charge California ratepayers for the costs of purchasing power.  From our
analysis of the bill, the language in AB1X appears to leave intact the
California PUC,s exclusive jurisdiction over ratemaking in California.  As
such, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree to include in rates
adequate charges to cover DWR,s costs of power purchases.

Ambiguous Regulatory Authority Regarding Contract &Prudence8
The language in AB1X leaves open the possibility that the California Public
Utilities Commission could determine that power purchases made by DWR are
&imprudent.8  On the basis of such a finding, the CPUC could then refuse to
allow DWR to collect from ratepayers the costs associated with its power
purchases.  Consequently, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree
to include in rates the charges to cover the costs of power contracts that
DWR has entered into with suppliers.

Ambiguous Language Regarding the Ratemaking Mechanism that Will Be Used to
Recover DWR,s Costs of Power Purchases
In addition to the ambiguity regarding ratemaking and regulatory authority
noted above, the language in the bill is equally ambiguous with respect to
the specific ratemaking &mechanics8 that AB1X directs the PUC to employ to
permit DWR to recover its power purchase costs. Based on our analysis, it is
extremely difficult to determine how the PUC would design the rates to ensure
DWR recovers its power purchase costs.  Moreover, as currently drafted, it is
difficult to determine whether AB1X would even permit the PUC to include in
rates all of the charges necessary to fully recover DWR,s power purchase
costs.  Again, this ambiguity raises significant credit risk concerns since
suppliers have little assurance that DWR will have the ability to recover
from ratepayers the costs of purchasing power.

Options to Resolve Concerns Regarding Credit Risk

We have been working diligently with DWR officials to resolve the credit risk
issues.  We have identified three options:

Amend AB1X
The amendments, which are attached to this email, would clarify that a) the
PUC would accept as &prudent and reasonable8 all purchase costs incurred by
DWR, and b) the PUC is obligated to include in rates the charges necessary to
ensure that DWR fully recovers its costs of power purchases.  This is the
preferred option, though we understand that the there may be some political
challenges standing in the way of amending AB1X.  (See attached file
entitled, &AmendAB1X.doc8.)

Clarify the Ambiguities in AB1X through an Order Issued by the PUC, and
through Contract Language
This is the option that we are currently working with DWR officials to
implement.  However, it is more complicated and could take significantly more
time to implement than the "legislative" fix.  We have attached electronic
copies of the talking points related to the order that the California PUC
would need to issue under this option.  (See attached file entitled,
&cpuctalkingpoints.doc.8)

Make Use of Other Instruments Designed to Address Credit Risk
As indicated in our letter responding to DWR,s RFP, we are willing to accept
other forms of credit from DWR.  Those options include a letter of credit,
cash prepayment, or an acceptable form of collateral.  DWR officials have
indicated to us that DWR prefers to pursue the second options. That is, DWR
prefers to clarify the ambiguities in AB1X through a PUC order and through
contract amendments.

4. California,s Supply-demand Picture Heading into Summer 2001

Both the California Energy Commission and Cambridge Energy Research
Associates (CERA), a private sector energy think tank, have issued reports
showing that California faces a severe supply-demand imbalance.  They differ
only on how much and how soon additional supply will be made available.  All
credible sources agree that supply will be very tight throughout the Summer
of 2001 and that unless a solution is found immediately, blackouts are
likely.

CEC and CERA both forecast that California will be short of supply this
summer by approximately 5,000 MW.   These numbers are in line with our
estimates.  California,s supply base currently has a 6% capacity margin, well
below the average 15-20%, which is recommended for reliable system operation
in the West.  Since the West relies more heavily upon hydroelectric power
than other regions, reserves are particularly important, owing to the
unpredictability of the weather and the dry year the West has experienced to
date. In the event of a low rain and snow period, the system must possess the
flexibility to respond to the reduced availability of power supply.
California,s very low reserve margin makes it especially susceptible to this
requirement.

Other reasons for reduced supply for the Summer of 2001 include the early
draw-down of reservoirs in the continual effort to manage California's severe
supply-demand gap; emissions restrictions on existing plants; and a reduced
number of customers who can be curtailed under their contracts with the
utilities.  Cambridge Energy Research Associates asserts that at the current
pace of siting, permitting and construction, adequate supplies will not be
added to correct the market imbalance until 2003 at the earliest.

CERA predicts that California is likely to face approximately 20 hours of
rolling black outs this summer.  The CEC paints a considerably more
optimistic scenario, betting that California will bring an additional 5,000
MWs on line to meet peaking summer demand.  It is our view that California
should view the CEC's "rosy scenario" with considerable skepticism.

5. Suggested Package of Legislative Proposals Designed to Solve California,s
Electricity Crisis

This email offers an overview of our proposed legislative solution.  We will
deliver to your office tomorrow specific legislative language and existing
bills that we believe can accommodate our proposals.

As we have suggested throughout the crisis, any solution to California's
crisis must focus on four issues:

Increase supply
Decrease demand
Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market
Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency

Increase supply--Legislative vehicle: SB28X (Sher)
To site and construct a power plant in Texas takes approximately 2 years.
Enron and others have completed the entire process in other states in less
than a year.  In California, it takes about six years, or longer.

The Governor,s executive orders and Senator Sher,s siting reform legislation
are steps in the right direction.  Our suggested amendments can improve those
efforts by further addressing the difficulties that project developers face
in securing air emission reduction credits to meet the air permit
requirements included in the CEC's certification requirements.  Enron,s
proposal seeks to streamline the process for 1) obtaining credits and 2)
transfering credits between air districts.  In addition, it creates an
innovative emissions reduction bank to allow project sponsors to fund
emissions in advance of obtaining certification, and permits the affected air
districts to use those funds to finance projects that will produce the
required reductions in pollution emissions.

Decrease demand*Legislative Vehicle:   AB31X (Wright)
Because of the delay in getting a solution in place in California, closing
the supply-demand gap through energy conservation and efficiency offers the
best chance of avoiding blackouts this summer.  This can be accomplished most
effectively and quickly in two ways:

Buy-down demand
California is tapping into an enormous amount of money from the General Fund
to finance DWR,s power purchases.  California could likely reduce demand more
economically by running an auction to determine the payments businesses would
be willing to receive to reduce their demand for a sustained period (e.g.,
through the summer months).  DWR could easily run an on-line auction to
determine the price it could pay for these demand reductions.  To
participate, businesses would be required to have the metering equipment
necessary to monitor and verify that they are actually achieving the
reductions.  Enron has developed an on-line auction software package, &Deal
Bench,8 that it would be willing to contribute to the effort.

Use Price Signals to Incent Voluntary Curtailment
To be successful, customers need access to the following key elements:

An internet based hour-ahead price posting system to track the market price
for hour-ahead power in real time.
Real-time metering systems for baseline demand and voluntarily curtailment
verification.
Settlement process that allows for market clearing prices of energy to be
paid for load reduction (&Negawatts8).

The potential benefits of an effective demand response program would include:

&creation8 of additional summer peaking capacity in California, particularly
in the short term, without requiring construction of additional generation
resources.
reduction of  peak or super-peak load on the over-stressed California
electric system, thus potentially reducing the overall cost of electricity in
the state.
fostering of demand elasticity without subjecting customers to the full risk
of hourly market price volatility by passing market price signals to
customers and allowing them to voluntarily shed load and be compensated for
responding.

We estimate that we could generate a summer 2001 on-peak demand response in
excess of 400 MW during certain high cost hours, and a demand response for
summer 2002 on-peak hours that could exceed 1000 MW.  We further estimate
that the market response to this program from all ESPs could be 2 to 3 times
that amount.  We recommend that the State of California provide rebates
directly to customers to fund the installation of advanced metering and
control systems that would support load curtailment implementation.

Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market*Legislative vehicle:
SB27X
The only customers who were protected from price volatility in San Diego were
customers who chose Direct Access and signed fixed price deals with energy
service providers.  Ironically, AB1X takes that important option away from
customers and businesses.  It is critical that AB1X be amended to remove the
prohibition against Direct Access.

Enron's legislative proposal would give customers freedom to enter into a
direct access transaction, while simultaneously addressing the Department of
Water Resources' concerns about stranded power costs that might result from
customer migration.

In addition, California will only achieve a competitive retail market when
the utility is removed completely from the procurement function.  Procurement
is not a utility core competency, as evidenced by the dire financial
condition in which the utilities now find themselves.  California should
therefore begin immediately to phase the utility out of the procurement
function entirely, with the goal of having all customers served by a
non-utility provider within 36 months.  To execute the transition, California
should hold a series of competitive solicitations over the 36-month period in
which competing service providers would bid for the right to serve segments
of utility load.

Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency*Legislative vehicle:
AB18X
Utility bankruptcy will not increase supply and it will not decrease demand.
In short, bankruptcy does nothing to solve California,s supply-demand
imbalance.  In addition, bankruptcy increases the likelihood that consumers
and businesses will bear the significant financial risks of having California
State government assume the role of &electricity buyer8 for an extended
period of time.  Finally, bankruptcy will undermine both investor confidence
in California's energy markets and the private sector's willingness to
participate in that market.

California can return the utilities to financial solvency by implementing a
series of staged rate increases.  California should design those rate
increases with the dual goal of returning the utilities to solvency without
&shocking8 the economy or household budgets For example, California could
amortize the recovery of the utilities, past debt over a 5-10 year period.
In addition, the magnitude of the rate increase can be reduced in two ways:
First, the utilities could absorb some portion of their existing debt in
recognition of the risk they accepted when they agreed to the structure of AB
1890.  Second, California can &net8 the revenues the utilities have received
from selling electricity into the Power Exchange against the debts they have
accrued due to the retail price cap.


To all,

             If you would like to contribute towards a gift for Scott Neal
and/or Kimberly Brown, please drop your contribution by my desk.  Would like
to collect $20 for each but any amount would be appreciated.  I will take a
check and would like to receive by Tuesday!  Thanks in advance!


<Embedded Outlook Message Attachment>


Congrats Ray.  ... Now, get FERC to do something amazing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001
02:12 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Richard Shapiro                           05/14/2001 09:52 PM

To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter E Weidler/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve
Hopper/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES

Subject: Re: Tariffs Approved

Outstanding outcome- Ray, this was an incredible result given the challenging
context, to say the least....You should feel quite proud of this achievment-
Thanks!

Linda Robertson
05/14/2001 01:06 PM
To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Tariffs Approved

Excellent, and congratulations.

	Ray Alvarez
	05/14/2001 12:34 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Tariffs Approved

The rate case that the governmental affairs group filed in January, on behalf
of Transredes, has come to a very successful conclusion and the new rates
will go into effect towards the end of this month.  The rates are not much
lower than what we filed for, and represent a very significant increase over
the previous rates.  The tariff methodology and revised regulations, put into
effect by the Supreme Decree, were followed to the letter by the regulator
despite political pressure to arbitrarily keep rates down.  The deliverables
here were to (1) obtain a tariff methodology via Supreme Decree that would
make the company finance-able / rescue it from dire financial straits and (2)
file a rate case and prosecute it to obtain hard rates in accordance with the
tariff methodology.  This second deliverable has now been completed.
Transredes has had a bond issue pending since last year due to the
uncertainty about rates; it is my understanding that the financial market
loved the ruling and that Transredes sold $40 million worth of bonds in about
5 minutes!  This ruling should also significantly increase Transredes's
market value, relative to Enron's efforts to sell its interest in the company.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron on 05/14/2001 11:38
AM ---------------------------

Doug Farmer
05/11/2001 06:09 PM

To: Peter E Weidler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Hansvander.klink@shell.com.br, Hans.h.vanderklink@si.shell.com
cc: Jan van den Berg/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, John
Naphan/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Cyro Camacho/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Pedro
Elio/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Fernando Gonzalez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES

Subject: Tariffs Approved

Gentlemen,

I am delighted to report that SIRESE approved substantial increases in TR's
tariffs consistent with the Law and Regulation.  The details are :-

     Existing Tariff SIRESE Approved % Increase TR/CLHB Proposed TR/CLHB %
Increase

Gas Export (including surcharges)  $0.18  $0.2205  22.5%  $0.26 (excluding
RG)  44.4%
Liquids Domestic    $1.05  $2.46  134.3%  $3.25    209.5%
Liquids Export     $1.55  $2.31  49%  $3.35    116.1%

CLHB's tariffs were also approved as follows $1.19  $2.20  84.9%  $3.528
196.5%

As you can see we did substantially better than CLHB (comparable with our
liquids domestic) !!

We will get a detailed report on the assumptions used by SIRESE to reach
their conclusions on Monday, but our inteligence suggests the following :-

1. Export gas volumes increased to 100% TR capacity, and 100% GSA + Cuiaba 2
assumed for SDA and TEMIN purposes
2. RG Compresion project deleted
3. Interest rate reduced to 10 or 10.5 % i.e. the rate in our bond issue
4. Liquids expansion in the South reduced
5. Some continuity of service CAPEX reduced
6. Unknown OPEX reduction and maybe a change to the OPEX allocation between
concesions
7. OCC in service date slipped from 2003 to 2004.
8. Debt/Equity assumption changed from 60/40 to 70/30

Our strategy to respond to each of these points is as follows :-

1. Volumes.  Covered by 8% rule, we can blete but can expect little back
here.  Clearly we will appeal if volumes exceed installed capacity in the
short term i.e. 2002/2003.
2. RG Compression - not worth fighting for since we don't even have the
support of BG
3. Interest Rate - We'll get this back when we do a tariff  revision and
actual rates are used.  When we get the detail we will appeal if Jan feels we
have concrete grounds i.e. commision costs etc. are omited.
4. Liquids Expansion in the South.  Here we intend to do a detailed analysis
of exactly what has been deleted and as a result what liquids/gas production
will be shut in.  If possible all assumptions to be agreed with the affected
producers (PB, BG, Vintage and Chaco).  We will then write to those
producers(copy SIRESE , VMEH etc.) stating that on their recommendation the
project scope was reduced by SIRESE.  We will give them an estimate of the
lost liquids/gas production (in both volume and cash terms) resultant from
this decision.  We will tell them that since they proposed these reductions
we have no intention of appealing them but invite them to appeal.
5. Continuity of Service Capex.  We need to see the detail here.  We will
take the moral high ground and be absolutely clear that we are not prepared
to compromise our safety and environmental standards.  We need to see exactly
what has been removed, but my thought is that if that means we are unable to
provide some services (e.g. LPG transportation) or the continued operation of
some liquids laterals, we should write to those producers affected suggesting
that if they wish these services to be continued they need to appeal the
decision.  Again since this is Capex we will get it back in the end on tariff
revisions as long as the expenditure is approved on an annual basis in the
SIRESE budget process.
6. OPEX - need to see the detail on Monday.
7. OCC - will not appeal - we need to do a detailed study to develop an OCC
strategy.
8. Debt/Equity ratio.  Strictly speaking what has been done is in accordance
with the Law/Regulation - the regulation says the maximum allowed equity is
40%.  However, we have very strong grounds to appeal since : a) we are
currently miles away from 60/40 let alone 70/30, b) we can only borrow for
CAPEX (as per bond issue and the policy of all/most banks/lending
institutions) with the case presented in the rate case if we borrow to cover
100% of CAPEX we can easily demonstrate that we are still miles away from
60/40.  We intend to fight this one very hard using all the
external/independant help we can get.

As you are all aware our big exposure with the rate case was that the much
needed substantial increase in liquids tariffs would not be approved and we
would be subjected to some form of arbitary cut.  This has not happened
SIRESE has now approved and hence owns these substantial increases.  Having
got the big hike our job is now to claw back as much as we can from the above
strategy in the full knowledge that the results of these efforts will be much
smaller and hence managable increases.

Attached is an analysis of the individual impacts on the tariff of the above
points and the corporate model using the new tariff with our volume
assumptions (i.e. the worst case).

Regards,
Doug


The Capitol Connection is pleased to announce that it will broadcast (via the internet and telephone only) the Single Market Design Forum convened by the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (MISO), PJM Interconnection and Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP).  It will be held on Friday, February 8, 2002 from 9 am to 1 pm ET.  For more information on this Forum please go to:

www.miso-pjm-spp.com <http://www.miso-pjm-spp.com/>This Forum is to discuss the development of a single market that meets the needs of all customers and stakeholders using the electric power grid in the regions served by them.  Central to the development of a single market is a design that meets the needs of market participants through one-stop shopping.

This Forum will be available to Capitol Connection FERC Annual Internet Contract Patrons at no additional charge.  If you do not have a yearly Internet contract, and would like to receive the Forum via the Internet or phone, click here <http://www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu/file:///S:/webshare/capcon/Special%20Meeting-Half%20Day.htm> for the contract or call 703.993.3100:


FYI

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001 11:24 AM -----

	"Ken" <kckrisa@apex2000.net>
	02/22/2001 11:05 AM
	Please respond to kckrisa

		 To: "Mark Castiglione \(E-mail\)" <Mark.Castiglione@enron.com>, "Scott Josey
\(E-mail\)" <scott.josey@enron.com>, "Steve Pruett \(E-mail\)"
<steve.pruett@enron.com>, "Gerald R. Nemec \(E-mail\)"
<Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>, "Andrew Edison \(E-mail\)"
<andrew.edison@enron.com>
		 cc: "Audrey O'Neil \(E-mail\)" <Audrey.ONeil@enron.com>, "Chris Clark
\(E-mail\)" <chris.clark@enron.com>, "Clark Butts \(E-mail\)"
<rcbutts@bcck.com>
		 Subject: Conversation with Petrie Parkman on WEP acquisition

We finally had a conversation with Bill Garner at Petrie Parkman late
Wednesday afternoon, 2/21/01.  Tom Brown representatives are not discussing
the status of the WEP acquisition with any entities.

Bill informed us that they are in negotiations with a single entity for the
entire Wildhorse Package as included in the data room plus some additional
Colorado assets that were not included in the package.  Bill also informed
us (and the reason he returned our call) is that he indicated he believes
the entity would be "friendly" to Crescendo  and has expressed interest (to
them) in "working with us" on our project and plans.  We reminded him that
there are still issues with our existing contract that need to be
expediently resolved, and we aren't going to wait 6 months to resolve these
issues.  He assured us that Tom Brown is very aware of contractual issues.
He indicated that the entity wanted to contact Crescendo now (before
execution of the PSA), but TBI insists on working through PSA issues before
contact with Crescendo.  A PSA review meeting is scheduled for next week.
Bill said he would make introductions for us as soon as the PSA is executed.

Bill also informed us that it was TBI management that made the decision to
sell all the assets instead of breaking up, even if breaking up brought a
higher sale price.

Ken Krisa


All

A reminder that Philip Allen will be presenting to you today in conference
room 32C2 at 4.00 pm.   This will be the first of many training sessions by
department leads with ENA on their respective areas.   Please ensure your
attendance.

Rgds,

Karen.
x54667

Room:  32C2
Time:  4 - 6 pm.

Wednesday, April 18th  Allen, Philip
Wednesday, May 2nd  Arnold, John
Wednesday, May 16th  Davis, Dana
Wednesday, May 30th  Gilbert-Smith, Doug
Wednesday, June 13th  Grigsby, Mike
Wednesday, June 27th  Martin, Thomas
Wednesday, July 11th  Neal, Scott
Wednesday, July 25th  Presto, Kevin
Wednesday, Aug 8th  Herndon, Rogers
Wednesday, Aug 22nd  Schwieger, Jim
Wednesday, Sept 5th  Shively, Hunter
Wednesday, Sept 19th  Sturm, Fletcher


Normally, the bill of sale is used to transfer personal property and the
deed to transfer real property.  If we are only selling the real property, no
bill of sale is needed.

	clbywaters1@aep.com
	06/07/2001 06:49 AM

		 To: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Crane County 640 Acre Sale

p.s.  we are not selling a pipeline at all.  just the fee property on which
no pipelines exist.  tell me where I lost you and I'll be happy to clarify
further.

thanks, Dan.

Candy

Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com on 06/06/2001 02:04:34 PM

To:   clbywaters1@aep.com
cc:

Subject:  Re: Crane County 640 Acre Sale

Where is your earnest money contract?  Isn't the information therein.  I
was not aware that we were selling a pipeline to anyone.  Please advise?

                    clbywaters1@a

                    ep.com               To:     dan.j.hyvl@enron.com

                                         cc:

                    06/06/2001           Subject:     Crane County 640 Acre
Sale
                    07:25 AM

---------------------- Forwarded by Candace L Bywaters/HO1/AEPIN on
06/06/2001 07:25 AM ---------------------------

Candace L Bywaters
06/06/2001 07:19 AM

To:   dan hyvl@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  Crane County 640 Acre Sale

While I'm in the process of getting the appropriate information for Mr.
Earp, one question.  Shouldn't we also have a bill of sale to accompany
this document, registering the value to be paid for this property?

Pls advise.

Candy


---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES on 01/24/2001
11:02 AM ---------------------------

Tamara Johnson
01/24/2001 11:10 AM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, JMB
<JBennett@GMSSR.com> @ ENRON
cc: Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Marc
Ulrich/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Dow Jones Index information

Additions from Jubran...

Proposed pricing mechanism:

Dow Jones Electricity Indexes, specifically their NP15/SP15 indexes.
- the indexes are based on weighted average prices and total volumes
- they measure "bilateral one-day prescheduled, financially firm transactions"
=> therefore the Dow Jones Index more accurately reflects market pricing
- Dow Jones has the right to randomly audit the data providers

why not the ex-post ISO?
- generators are not selling to California's ISO because of the $150/MWh
price cap,
=> therefore prices coming out of the ISO do not reflect real market prices
- there are purchases above the $150 soft cap, but the pricing of the out of
market transactions is explained to FERC only, this information is not in the
public domain
- if generators are not selling into the market, there is no liquidity,
therefore prices are not reflective of the prices that buyers must pay
- and generators may not be selling into the market due to the credit exposure

why not use the ex-post ISO price on an interim basis?
- because putting a false cap on the market price will result in price
increases to DA customers, contrary to AB1890, without due process
- Decision 99-06-058 set the foundation for the PX credit to reflect real
market prices, PG&E's proposal does not adhere to this.


Attached, please find SBX2 78 (Polanco), which is Senator Peace and Senator
Sher's MOU. Originally, this was Governor Davis' MOU but the Governor has
since switched his support
to ABX2 82 (Hertzberg and Keeley).

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0051-0100/sbx2_78_bill_20010716_amend
ed_sen.pdf


Attached is a draft regulatory timeline for the transaction--assuming a September 10 rollout.   Note that the timeline does not include dates for the Washington UTC or the SEC.   Joanne, please add your thoughts to the document and send comments back to me.

NNG agreed to the proposed "all hands" meetings in Portland.  Joanne and Adam, please put these dates on your calendars.

In our meeting with NW today, they made clear that they have not yet hired local counsel.  Apparently their counsel of choice has a potential conflict.  They are willing to seek a waiver, but that raises confidentiality issues.

Re:  FERC counsel, we provided two names for their consideration and emphasized the importance of getting counsel on board quickly.  We made the same point re:  a market power consultant.  They are willing to retain Hieronymous.  I'll forward the retainer letter to Mark Dodson this evening.

Re:  the rollout plan. We have NNG's agreement on the basics of the rollout plan, but NNG wanted to play with it a little.  They will send back a final copy of the document.  I'll circulate it once I receive the document.


Greg,

Attached for your further handling is the draft interconnect Agreement
between HPL and BPE Energy.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Tried to call but couldn't reach you - I think we do need to discuss contracts for both of them and find the money for them.
I am assuming from this that you are in - which is great news.

I will forward to Oxley to make him aware that there is something coming.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Here is the detail on the new products:

THOMPSONVILLE
Receipt Pts
Lobo Thompsonville (Meter #9648)
Tejas Thompsonville (Meter #6351)
PG&E Thompsonville (Meter #6296)

Delivery Pt.
NGPL Thomsponville (Meter #1342)

AGUA DULCE
Receipt Pts.
PG&E Riverside (Meter #6040)
PG&E Agua Dulce (Meter #584)
Tennesee Agua Dulce (Meter #574)
Lobo Agua Dulce (Meter #7038)
Tejas Gregory (Meter #3358)
Channel Agua Dulce (Meter #3500)
MOPS/NNG Tivoli (Meter #5674)
Tomcat (Meter #553)

Delivery Pts.
Tejas Riverside (Meter #3543)
NGPL Riverside (Meter #3545)
Channel Agua Dulce (Meter #3500)
Tenessee Agua Dulce (Meter #694)
Koch Bayside (Meter #3537)

We would like to get these products out by bid week if at all possible.

Let me know if you have further questions.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


Dear Mark; With the help of my instructor I got a copy of your Turkish
article.  Can you mail me a translation as I am a little rusty with my
Turkish.  Also I am assuming that is a piece of chalk in your hand as I
assume you don't want me to give you a lecture on the dangers of smoking
cigarettes.
     The telephone number of the Comfort Suites next to Payton's is
(630)896-2800.
      I also got your E-mail with the Flight number--- thank you.  Tell
Sukran we are looking forward to meeting her next month.  We will not be at
the airport as we couldn't get close to you until you get through customs and
you will want to pick you car up then. If for some reason you would like us
there just say the word and if you do get held up at the airport give us a
call.

    Please keep us up to date on any new developments.  We are interested on
what is going on at the Istanbul law office particularly how they may effect
your position.
     Mother and I send Lots of Love and Kisses to You and Sukran.       DAD


DEar Geoff

Vero Tapia sent me a picture of your baby...so nice !!!

mil mil mil felicidades for you and your wife

sofia frech, from monterrey
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


How kind of you and Enron to think about employees like myself who have lost
a beloved family member and who are having a hard time during this holiday
season.  Dr. Williams' session below was very helpful, and I ran into 3
fellow employees that I work  with that I didn't even know were going through
a similar situation.  Thank you very much.

Happy Holidays to you and yours.

---------------------- Forwarded by Marie Newhouse/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000
06:05 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Corporate Benefits                           12/04/2000 08:07 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Downtown
cc:

Subject: Brown Bag - Dr. Kelly Williams


Fred/Kay,
Here is the address of the ABB St. Louis facility where the units are being
stored.

ABB Power T&D Company Inc.
4350 Semple Ave.
St. Louis, Mo. 63120

Contact for info should be directed to Karla Hesketh 713/821-4016 or Mike
Sandridge 713/821-4005 cell 281/794-1188.

Please let us know if you require any further assistance.

MIKE


Market Surveillance Committee report is smallest file, oldest doc (August),
and probably the best message from our prespective, particularly the
solutions.  PX report is the biggest file and the newest (11.1.00).


Hello,

I'm currently on vacation until Monday, November 26th, however, if you need immediate GCP - EES assistance, please contact Tandra Coleman, Mgr., (713) 853-1727 , with the Global Counterparty - EES team.

If you need any other assistance with GCP (Houston Operations), please contact Albert Escamilla, (713) 853-7578.

Thanks & Have a Great Thanksgiving Week!


Tim

Given the tight schedule, lets try to find a half and hour for me to sit in
front of all of the traders at once.

John


Stephanie,

Attached is the latest Enron's Energy Market Opportunities Slide, along with the narrative page that will have detail of the slide.

If Jeff or Sally have any questions, please ask them to call David Leboe at 34785.


The Word of the Day for April 6 is:

                  ambrosia  \am-BRO-zhuh\  (noun)
                  1 a : the food of the Greek and Roman gods b : the ointment
                  or perfume of the gods
                  *2 : something extremely pleasing to taste or smell
                  3 : a dessert made of oranges and shredded coconut

                  Example sentence:
                  "We feasted that evening as on nectar and ambrosia; and not
                  the least delight of the entertainment was the smile of
                  gratification with which our hostess regarded us, as we
satisfied
                  our famished appetites on the delicate fare she liberally
                  supplied." (Charlotte Bronte, Jane Eyre)

                  Did you know?
                  "Ambrosia" literally means "immortality" in Greek; it is a
                  derivative of the Greek word "ambrotos," meaning "immortal,"
                  which combines the prefix "a-" (meaning "not") with
"-mbrotos"
                  (meaning "mortal"). In Greek and Roman mythology, only
                  immortals -- gods and goddesses -- could eat ambrosia. Those
                  mythological gods and goddesses also drank "nectar," which,
in
                  its original sense, refers to the "drink of the gods."
(Even today,
                  you'll often find the words "ambrosia" and "nectar" in each
                  other's company.) While the "ambrosia" of the gods prevented
                  death, we mere mortals use "ambrosia" in reference to things
                  that just taste or smell especially delicious.


its on the way

>>> <Mark.Guzman@enron.com> 03/16/01 08:06AM >>>

Hey could you do me a favor and fax me my brackets.  i dont really remember
all of my picks.  my fax number is 503-464-3740.  email me when you send
it. Thanks dude.


------------
From:	"Schwitzer, Jennifer Lokenvitz" <jschwitzer@mcguirewoods.com>@ENRON [IMCEANOTES-+22Schwitzer+2C+20Jennifer+20Lokenvitz+22+20+3Cjschwitzer+40mcguirewoods+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, March 19, 2001 6:48 PM
To:	'carl.fink@neg.pge.com'; 'clevander@nisource.com'; 'cdavis@glgt.com'; 'coharra@velaw.com'; Getchell, E. Duncan Jr.; 'hendricksond@epenergy.com'; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; 'hmay@velaw.com'; 'rmfmckinney@aol.com'; Schwitzer, Jennifer Lokenvitz; Blasiak, James L.; 'jdreskin@INGAA.org'; 'jhb@vnf.com'; 'jschaefgen@thelenreid.com'; 'jjohnson@velaw.com'; 'jneason@wcp.twc.com'; 'tiggka@wbip.com'; 'KBDriver@JonesDay.com'; 'kkrieger@nisource.com'; 'alexanderl@dsmo.com'; 'mark.cook@coastalcorp.com'; 'marsha.palazzi@neg.pge.com'; 'mike.mcmahon@gulfsouthpl.com'; 'pik@vnf.com'; 'Paul_Mallory@kindermorgan.com'; 'Pludwig@INGAA.org'; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'; 'scott.c.turkington@williams.com'; 'Shelley_Corman@enron.com'; 'sam@vnf.com'
Cc:	Peters, Margaret H.
Subject:	Draft Penalty Brief

Please see the attached.
Jennifer Lokenvitz Schwitzer
McGuireWoods LLP
Washington Square
1050 Connecticut Ave N.W., Suite 1200
Washington, DC 20036
202-857-1721 (Direct Line)
202-828-2988 (Direct Fax)
jschwitzer@mcguirewoods.com

*Admitted only in Oklahoma

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise by return e-mail and delete immediately without reading or forwarding to others.

 - CORPORATE SERVICES-#56592-4.DOC


kimberlyward - lydgate


There are Unresolved/Open items in the vendor payables system (iPayIt) and employee reimbursement system (XMS).  Employees are strongly encouraged to resolve items in their inboxes.  Please either process and approve, or reject these outstanding business expenses in your inboxes by 2:00 p.m. Monday, December 3, 2001.

For assistance with XMS please contact:
Enron Travel Management
(713) 345-6252, enron travel@enron.com <mailto:travel@enron.com>.

For assistance with iPayIt please contact:
Integrated Solutions Center
(713) 345-4727, iPayit@enron.com <mailto:iPayit@enron.com>


Stephanie,

Can you provide Travis, the ClickPaper lawyer, with a copy of the Japanese
ETA?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000 01:50 PM -----

	Travis McCullough
	08/03/2000 01:43 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Japan

Tana, I think Edmund may be on holiday; do you know who might be able to pull
the Japan ETA for me?  Thanks.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Please plan to attend a meeting on Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 8:30 AM in Conf. Rm. 1336 to discuss Transwesterns position on PG&E's Plan of Reorganization.  In particular they have requested our support of their filing at FERC (Docket No. CP02-41) to convert their backbone system into an interstate pipeline (GTrans).  Interventions in this docket are due January 29th.  Below is the link to PG&E's home page location with a summary of their proposal.  Should you have any other questions or need additional data, please advise.  gh

http://www.pge.com/pipeline/library/por/gtrans.pdf


#299192  (DPL delivery to storage for ENA)
#299159     (DPL delivery to all other mkts for ENA)

thanks
joann

Chris Germany@ECT
09/05/2000 02:35 PM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal Tickets

What are deal tickets 299159 and 299192?


http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
Energy Exchanges Online - Scottsdale - December 4-6
B2B e-commerce has revolutionized commodity trading, the A&D process and
procurement within the energy industry. With heavyweight keynotes and in-depth
panel discussions this is the first event to bring the major energy companies,
net markets, venture capitalists, regulatory bodies, investment banks and
analysts together to thrash out why its not business as usual but business
online.

For more information please visit www.eyeforenergy.com/xonline

*********************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 7, 2000 from Phoenix, AZ
CEOs Speak on the Strategic Importance (or Lack Thereof) of Information
Technology in the Energy Industry
By: Jon T. Brock, Director, Strategic and Competitive Intelligence
===============================================================

Four CEOs participated in a panel entitled the "CEO Mega Panel: View From
the Top" at the 48th annual EEI/AGA Energy Information Technology Conference
in Phoenix this week.  The moderator was Charles Bayless, former chairman,
president and CEO of Illinova.  The remaining three CEOs included: Keith
Stamm, CEO, Aquila Energy; Dr. Matthew Cordaro, president and CEO, Midwest
ISO; and James Pignatelli, chairman, president and CEO, UniSource Energy.

ANALYSIS:  This panel was diversified in a very interesting manner. The
conference organizers did a good job in getting a cross-section of the
energy industry in transition.  The trading organization specialist was
represented with Aquila, the ISO specialist was represented with the Midwest
ISO, and the vertically integrated utility was represented with UniSource
Energy.  Each panelist was asked what role information technology (I/T)
played in their respective organization.  Their answers may surprise you.

Dr. Matthew Cordaro of the Midwest ISO went first.  Dr. Cordaro stressed
that I/T was very critical to the operation of an ISO, saying "it is
essentially
the foundation of the ISO." He mentioned that the Midwest ISO had started
from scratch and would have to be able to handle hundreds of thousands
of transactions every week in a real-time operation.  Among the
responsibilities
that the Midwest ISO is entrusted with are: monitoring the congestion on
the grid and taking appropriate action, preventing gaming through market
monitoring, settlement processing (who owes who what), and handling the
dispute process.

The Midwest ISO signed a contract with the Regional Transmission Organization
(RTO) Alliance on July 20 of this year to deliver an integrated control
center system (ICCS) that, when complete, will provide $50 million in
infrastructure
for the MISO.  The RTO Alliance, which consists of ALSTOM ESCA Corporation
of Seattle, Open Access Technology International (OATI) of Minneapolis,
Perot Systems of Dallas, Texas, and TenFold Corporation of Salt Lake City,
Utah, will deliver an electricity transmission system that will enable
MISO to match electricity demand with available transmission. The hardware
and software in the ICCS project will support MISO's operational functions
including transmission planning, reservation, scheduling, real-time monitoring
and control, settlement and billing.  Dr. Cordaro also stated that Lodestar
was involved in the MISO and that communications had been outsourced to
AT&T Solutions.

Keith Stamm of Aquila Energy went next.  Keith began by clarifying Aquila's
focus as trading: owning very little assets in a high-volume, low-margin,
high-volatility business.  I/T is very important in the trading business.
 Real-time information must be known and disseminated appropriately to
the right individuals.  Keith believes that one of Aquila's strategic assets
and strengths is its risk management system.  Aquila strives for a real-time
calculation of risk.

Aquila Energy, a subsidiary of UtiliCorp United, Inc., has been a surprising
winner in the trading marketplace this year, showing a 113-percent growth
since last year with $9 billion total revenue for the past six months,
of that $55 million in trading revenue compared to $18 million in 1999.
The EBIT was $34.2 million vs. $9 million a year ago. Aquila has gathered
top traders and intellectual, financial, and risk management personnel
to enthusiastically participate in the power marketing race.

Keith mentioned a recent alliance with five other companies * including
top traders AEP and Duke Energy * as an investment step Aquila perceived
was necessary to keep pace with trader tycoon Enron and other online trading
platforms. The Energy Trading Consortium (Duke Energy, AEP, Aquila Energy,
Reliant Energy, Southern Company Energy Marketing and El Paso Energy) is
in progress to create an exchange that the participants hope will reap
benefits from the transaction cost, liquidity, volume and speed of exchange.
 This consortium differentiates itself from EnronOnline by bringing many
buyers and sellers to the platform as opposed to one-to-many.  Another
competitor recently launched is e-Speed's TradeSpark.

James Pignatelli of UniSource Energy went last and had some controversial
statements concerning information technology.  James stated that I/T in
the vertically integrated utility is not strategic, at least not at the
present time.  James believes that I/T will become strategic someday (in
the deregulated market).

James claims getting frustrated with platform switching in the I/T arena.
 He mentioned pulling in his I/T folks and saying, "Let's switch the
distribution
network to DC power and once the public has bought new appliances, we'll
switch back to AC." While James' comments may have been controversial with
the more than 500 attendees and approximately 50 energy CIOs in the audience,
he does have a point.  The vertically integrated utility's core strength
is to generate power and distribute it to "captive" customers reliably.
 While some I/T systems (like outage management and SCADA devices) may
be strategic in this sense, the other parts of I/T are questionable and
could be candidates for outsourcing.

James claims to be working on B-2-B and B-2-C initiatives at the moment.
 His vision for B-2-C is a smart chip in the residence that has access
to instantaneous pricing information.  The residence will "buy" electricity
for itself from the most efficient supplier and it will be able to reduce
load, thereby reducing the T&D utility to a simple conduit for service.

James and Charles Bayless both were involved in New Energy Ventures prior
to its sale to AES.  In 1997, Tucson Electric invested $3 million in NEV
and Charles Bayless (then Tucson Electric's chairman, president and chief
executive officer) and James Pignatelli (Tucson Electric's senior vice
president and chief operating officer) served on New Energy Venture's
administrative
committee.

It is interesting to view the different parts of the energy marketplace
as it unbundles and the profound impact that is occurring on the associated
I/T systems.  If one were to stop and think about it, deregulation could
not occur without the complex I/T systems that are employed today in the
marketplace.  I wonder what Thomas Edison and Samuel Insull would have
thought about an unbundled electric marketplace.  It is, in fact, undoing
their design of an integrated electric system constructed for operational
efficiency.
===============================================================
See SCIENTECH's exclusive products and services at:
http://www.consultrci.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Jon T. Brock
Director, Strategic and Competitive Intelligence
jbrock@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
jbrock@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


Further to my Questionnaire to Maureen Bartlett at Cadwalader on the
applicability of U.S. securities' laws in the context of a London Equities'
Desk, I received Maureen's responses in a lengthy telephone call yesterday
afternoon.  I shall only comment where according to Maureen we shall have to
be mindful of an issue - where I do not comment, Maureen said the answer to
the Question was "no" (i.e., good news for us).  Hence, Maureen's advice:-

Q 6 - Generally, ECTII would only bear responsibility to US regulatory
authorities for EEFT's acts and omissions if ECTII was a "knowing
co-conspirator" in an EEFT act or omission which violated US securities'
laws.  EEFT would not have any responsibility for its acts and omissions to
any US regulatory authority.  EEFT would not have any responsibility to US
regulatory authorities for any acts or omissions of ECTII except again only
to the extent that it may have colluded with ECTII.  The only exceptions to
these positions are set out below.

Q 7 - U.S. disclosure requirements re interests in equities - where initially
EEFT acts as pure arranger without any discretion for ECTII (i.e., pure
execution-only facility in London), the U.S. disclosure requirements will be
down to ECTII to comply with (as the principal).  This will still be the case
if EEFT moves to having agency authority (i.e., having discretion) to book
trades to ECTII - the only difference here is that there will need to be
extra careful monitoring to ensure that EEFT does not do a deal in a stock
out of London which, when aggregated with other Enron Group interests in that
stock, take us over a disclosable amount (e.g., under s 13d SEA '34, a 5 %
holding of a stock registered under s 12 SEA '34; and 10 % under s 16a SEA
'34).  This will mean that we shall need extra careful use and monitoring of
Watch and Restricted Lists between London and Houston and may be London
having a policy preventing acquisition by the London desk of a large block of
stock (to be defined) in any U.S. entity without Houston's consent.

Q 8 + Q 9 - U.S. Insider Dealing laws apply to (a) stock of U.S. issuers and
(b) stock of non-U.S. issuers listed in the U.S..  EEFT would not be liable
under U.S. Insider Dealing laws unless it knew that it had price-sensitive
information (as defined under U.S. laws) and dealt in either (a) or (b) or
encouraged another to deal, etc.  ECTII  would not be liable vicariously to
the US authorities for EEFT in this respect - ECTII would have to have
committed the offence itself, e.g. by having the knowledge then dealing etc
or colluding with EEFT.  Vice versa applies re ECTII - EEFT.  Basically this
comes down, once again, to having adequate. and well monitored Chinese Walls,
procedures, education of staff re what they can and cannot do etc.  As well
as other Chinese Walls, obviously ECTII staff would not be able to pass
price-sensitive information which is not publicly known to EEFT staff and
vice versa.

Q 10 + 11 - Re Reg S new issues.  As ECTII would be the principal and is in
the US, not only is ECTII directly prevented from buying a Reg S offering
within the lock-out period but so would EEFT as ECTII's arranger / agent.  If
EEFT purchased a Reg S offering within the lock-out period, ECTII would have
broken the rules.  Obviously this would have to go into the compliance manual
governing EEFT's conduct and again London trading would need to be actively
monitored for compliance.

I still firmly believe that there is nothing in the above advice which makes
a London equities' facility for Houston legally and technically difficult -
it comes down to Chinese Walls, policies and procedures and active daily
monitoring by a compliance department of the activities of the London desk.

Maureen will shortly be sending me her written confirmation of the advice
which she gave me over the telephone.

Kind regards

Mark


Thurs.?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 8:52 AM
To: virginia.hodge@painewebber.com
Subject: lunch

Virginia:

Hope you had a great holiday!

Pick a day for lunch (not today) and let me know.

Fran's daughter Cole just got engaged.  She's 23 years old.  I thought
that's how old we were!

Sara

Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by PaineWebber and
PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.


Can either of you open it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cappelletto, Nella   On Behalf Of Milnthorp, Rob
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:02 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Calger, Christopher F.; Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	NETCO Canada Business Plan
Importance:	High

Please find attached NETCO Canada's Business Plan.

Regards, Rob


================================================================
As requested, your News Alert for QCOM
follows from EquityAlert.com.
To edit/discontinue your alerts please refer to end of message.
PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER BELOW
================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= Paid Advertisement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Looking for an emerging growth company in an exciting, burgeoning
industry.

Search no more. Xraymedia.Com (OTC BB: XRMD) is currently assembling
partners to undertake the business of selling conventional
advertising space and online advertising in an industry that broke
the $2billion dollar mark in the second quarter of 2000. For more
compelling information on this exciting investment opportunity,

click here: http://205.210.134.51/a1.asp?ID=1249aa

AOL USERS: copy & paste the link above into your browser.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

QUALCOMM and Tektronix Expand CDMA License Agreement; 3G Amendment
Enables Tektronix to Further Develop and Manufacture Test Solutions for the
Wireless Industry

SAN DIEGO, Dec 11, 2000 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- QUALCOMM Incorporated (Nasdaq:
QCOM)
and Tektronix, Inc. (NYSE: TEK) today announced that they have entered into an
amended license agreement expanding Tektronix' existing Code Division Multiple
Access (CDMA) license agreement with QUALCOMM. Tektronix will use the license
to
develop and manufacture third-generation (3G) test solutions for the wireless
industry. These next-generation products will operate on higher-capacity
wireless networks, deployed to meet the growing demands for high-speed
wireless
data applications and Internet access.

"This 3G license agreement amendment for QUALCOMM's essential patent portfolio
at industry-standard royalty rates will allow Tektronix to expand its ability
to
develop and manufacture advanced next-generation test solutions for the 3G
CDMA
market, including cdma2000, WCDMA and 1xEV," said Marvin Blecker, senior vice
president of technology transfer for QUALCOMM. "We are pleased that Tektronix
has chosen to expand its license to help meet the growing demand for CDMA
wireless solutions."

"The wireless industry needs measurement tools that are capable of meeting the
immediate development needs of 3G applications," said Scott Bausback, vice
president, Communications Business Unit, Tektronix. "Access to QUALCOMM's
world-class technology enables Tektronix to create state-of-the-art 3G test
solutions -- and in turn, enable designers and manufacturers to successfully
develop and install the infrastructure needed to meet the growing demands of
today's wireless customers."

Tektronix, Inc. is a test, measurement and monitoring company providing
measurement solutions to the telecommunications, computer and semiconductor
industries worldwide. With over 50 years of experience, Tektronix enables its
customers to design, build, deploy and manage next-generation global
communications networks and Internet technologies. Headquartered in Beaverton,
Ore., Tektronix has operations in 26 countries worldwide. Tektronix' Web
address
is www.tektronix.com.

QUALCOMM Incorporated (www.qualcomm.com) is a leader in developing and
delivering innovative digital wireless communications products and services
based on the Company's CDMA digital technology. The Company's business areas
include integrated CDMA chipsets and system software; technology licensing;
Eudora(R) email software for Windows(R) and Macintosh(R) computing platforms;
digital cinema systems; and satellite-based systems including portions of the
Globalstar(TM) system and wireless fleet management systems, OmniTRACS(R) and
OmniExpress(TM). QUALCOMM owns patents that are essential to all of the CDMA
wireless telecommunications standards that have been adopted or proposed for
adoption by standards-setting bodies worldwide. QUALCOMM has licensed its
essential CDMA patent portfolio to more than 90 telecommunications equipment
manufacturers worldwide. Headquartered in San Diego, Calif., QUALCOMM is
included in the S&P 500 Index and is a 2000 FORTUNE 500(R) company traded on
The
Nasdaq Stock Market(R) under the ticker symbol QCOM.

Except for the historical information contained herein, this news release
contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and
uncertainties,
including the Company's ability to successfully design and have manufactured
significant quantities of CDMA components on a timely and profitable basis,
the
extent and speed to which CDMA is deployed, change in economic conditions of
the
various markets the Company serves, as well as the other risks detailed from
time to time in the Company's SEC reports, including the report on Form 10-K
for
the year ended September 24, 2000, and most recent Form 10-Q.

QUALCOMM, OmniTRACS and Eudora are registered trademarks and OmniExpress is a
trademark of QUALCOMM Incorporated. Globalstar is a trademark of Loral
QUALCOMM
Satellite Services, Incorporated. Windows is a registered trademark of
Microsoft
Corp. Macintosh is a registered trademark of Apple Computer Inc. All other
trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

CONTACT:          QUALCOMM Incorporated
Christine Trimble, Corporate Public Relations
858/651-3628, Fax 858/651-2590
ctrimble@qualcomm.com
or
Julie Cunningham, Investor Relations
858/658-4224, Fax 858/651-9303
jcunningham@qualcomm.com
or
Tektronix
Steve Kuyatt, Worldwide Public Relations
503/627-2001, Fax 503/627-4873
steven.j.kuyatt@tektronix.com
or
Heather Wyse, Investor Relations
503/627-1121, Fax 503/627-1161
heather.l.wyse@tektronix.com

URL:              http://www.businesswire.com
Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet
with Hyperlinks to your home page.

Copyright (C) 2000 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.

-0-

KEYWORD:          CALIFORNIA
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS
HARDWARE
INTERNET
SOFTWARE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
MARKETING
AGREEMENTS

****************** TO EDIT YOUR EQUITY ALERTS ********************
To unsubscribe or edit your alerts, visit
http://www.equityalert.com/alerts.asp?uid=alewis34&xid=40352
******************************************************************

***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL**
At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert
is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes
only.  We are a financial news re-distributor.  We are not an
investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which
companies you should monitor or which securities you should
purchase or sell.
In addition to the information regarding the company you are
monitoring (the &Monitored Company8), this email contains an
advertisement describing a product, service or company for which we
received a fee, at our normal advertising rates of $55 per 1,000 e-
mails (subject to volume and other discounts), from the advertising
company.  In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting
employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising
company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the
advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our
employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there
may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees
prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the
advertisement.
Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of
the press release issued by, or the research or other reports
regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the
advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from
third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by
us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance
as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any
independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the
subject matter of such releases and reports.
Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored
Company are provided for your convenience.  We assume no obligation
for the content of such sites.
All information contained herein should be independently verified
by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or
any other sources you prefer.
[THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO, THE &EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND
DISCLAIMER.8 PLEASE VISIT
http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp
FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]
******************************************************************


Thanks for the email.  Actually, you are completely wrong about my view of
Joe.  He has tremedous integrity, and is a very strong team builder, and has
added much value to our organization.  I was however a little surprised by
your move to go from a trading position to an analysis position.  I would
have been thrilled to have you help me design a position for you in that kind
of capacity here, or in london, or elsewhere if you liked.  In addition, I
could have talked to you about a junior trading spot in crude and products.
(Which I will remind you about frequently)

I'm sure your decision will prove valuable to Joe, and hopefully to you as
well.  Mike and I would like to see you back on the A-team though--we both
respect your business sense.

As far as the guilt thing goes, I can't help you.  I'm Jewish and our people
have suffered much longer than everyone else combined.

Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Derrick Jr., James
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:02 PM
To:	Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	FW: Life

Lisa, please see the message below from Gardere. Thank you. Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"FRANK PUTMAN" <fputman@gardere.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Fwd: Life

I guessed wrong on the email address.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:58:33 -0600
From: "FRANK PUTMAN" <fputman@gardere.com>
To: jderrick@enron.com
Subject: Life
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

I know that it is impossible to get you on the phone. I have left a couple of messages. I just thought I would let you know how much I feel for you and all of the good Enron folks. You all are in our thoughts and prayers. It does not seem possible that Houston's flagship company and premier corporate citizen could get struck by lightning. If it happens to you all, it could happen to anybody. I have been following the situation daily because I have been representing Tyco in a revision of their existing contract with EESO. It has not been pretty.

As you know, I have twice volunteered our firm's assistance to Enron in anyway we could be of help. I took the lack of response to mean you had all the help you needed. We have been approached by a couple of clients to advise them and to represent them if there appears no solution to Enron's problems short of protection of the bankruptcy court. Do you have an objection to our representation of them? I will assume that you have none if I do not hear from you to the contrary.


Amy:
Here are my answers  to your questions:
1.  Yes I think its a good idea, because you are able to reach a wide
audience with this advertisement.
2.  I don't think the contest should be limited to just these
schools/conferences.  You probably should open it up to all schools to get an
even wider reach of potential candidates.
3.  I would think that if you had a certain amount for the cash prize that
people would take it seriously to try and win the cash.
4.  Please let me know if I can support you in any way.
Thanks
Ben Rogers
3-7998


what game

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alon, Heather
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 8:27 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:

Hope you didn't drive all the way to New O to catch the game.

:)
H


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/10/2001 10:17
AM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/09/2001 04:21:35 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Delta Timetable

Kay:

Note the following timetable from the final version of the ENA/PPL letter
agreement:

(1)  ENA agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to deliver the final
form of the turbine contract on or before April 11, 2001.
(2)  The parties agreed to commercially reasonable efforts to execute an
escrow agreement on or before April 16, 2001.
(3)  The escrow account must be funded 3 business days after the later of
(a) ENA's delivery of the final form of the turbine contract and (b) the
closing of PPL's financing.
(4)  ENA can terminate if the escrow is not funded on or before April 19,
2001 (but this date gets pushed back by one business day for each business
day beyond April 11, 2001 that ENA delivers the final form of the turbine
contract).
(5)  The closing occurs at least 5, but not later than 10, business days
after funding the escrow account.
(6)  Either party may terminate if the closing has not occurred on or before
May 3, 2001.

If ENA delivers the final form of the turbine contract on April 11, 2001,
then the April 19, 2001 right to terminate stands.  PPL's obligation to fund
the escrow would then be determined by the date of its loan closing.  Greg
Lang advises that they are working on PPL's financing, but he did not give
an estimated date for financial closing.

I advised Greg on Friday that the legal opinions from both GE and Enron were
causing heartburn.  He agreed to pass this along to Isabel Parker.  He asked
today about GE's reaction to the consent document and if it would be
appropriate for Isabel Parker to contact GE directly at this point.  He also
requested a draft of the escrow disbursement instructions.  When you get a
chance, please advise of any comments in order that we can circulate for
PPL's review.  Also, we need to contact Citibank to clear the proposed form
of escrow agreement (and the anticipated disbursement instructions) and to
negotiate the fee.  Let me know if we can assist in this regard.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042124.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: HARBOR
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  28.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:   4.83 / Final:   4.80)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Do we still need to be transporting Bridgeport CNG produciton gas through
Coronado to CGAS?  AND if YES, will this gas always need to go through
Coronado?  I thought that was just a seasonal thing


Per our discussions yesterday, I did find an Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. Order On Rehearing in my file, dated August 5, 1997 in Docket No. RP97-126-002 (80 FERC P61,199) concerning scheduling alt FT by price.  On reviewing it again, some key points were:

	Allocate based on the highest percentage of the maximum rate - the rate used being the rate for the package of services that includes those secondary rights.
	The Commission maintains that all firm capacity, once scheduled, be curtailed pro rata, without regard to price.

Panhandle also filed on March 14, 1997 for scheduling alt FT by price at Docket No. RP97-291 (it's referenced in footnotes, but I don't have a copy of the filing).


Rest assured I am working on things for your here.  How are you?  How is Gail?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001
04:48 PM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Fortune Article

---------------------- Forwarded by Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES on 02/22/2001
04:45 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Timothy Blanchard                           02/22/2001 04:24 PM
	Phone No: 713-853-4755

To: AIP
cc:
Subject: Fortune Article

The article just discussed on CNNfn.


Agreed. Haedicke has given me travis and mary cook as legal and I understand they are digging through the contracts. I want to verify with litigation that the scope of the lawsuits re the el paso swaps would preclude their inclusion in a master netting agreement. I'm walking lenders through ena on/off bs debt and why majority is not, and must not, be considered enron recourse for sizing addtl leverage.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Rahul,

I shall be glad to meet with you. Please, give me a call
when you get here.

Vince

Rahul Kumar@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/16/2000 09:49 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Interview

Vince,

We had spoken a few weeks back, but were unable to meet due to our
schedules.  I will be back in Houston next week (August 21st), and would
appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and take your advice.

As I may have mentioned to you, I am interested in exploring opportunities
that are more US focused.  I think Paula Corey has already forwarded my
resume to you.  However, I have attached it to this note just in case.

I would really appreciate the opportunity to meet with you next week, and
would be grateful if you could let me know what time fits best with your
schedule.  I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Rahul


that was bbtu- i've resent with correction

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:18 AM
To: Killen, Faith
Subject: RE: What is our
Importance: High

What are the units. I want per mmbtu
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Paul:
Just a few questions for you on the revised EEI master that we received from
Engage today:

1. I just want to confirm that the collateral thresholds should be 9 million.

2. They want to have Section 8.1(b) and 8.2(b) apply which requires a party
to post collateral if the other party believes that its creditworthiness is
unsatisfactory.

2. In our Schedule, we delete the 3 day cure period for an event of default
that occurs as a result of a Guarantor's non-payment.  They want the cure
period.  do you care?

3. In Section 5.7, each party can suspend performance if a Potential Event of
Default or an Event of Default occurs. They want to delete Potential Event of
Default.

4. They want to extend the right to dispute invoices and to request
adjustments to statements or payments from 12 months to 18 months.

5. They want to change the consent to assignments standard from being able to
withhold consent in one's sole discretion to being able to withhold consent
only when it is reasonable to do so.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Let's try this.  It's all inter-related.  PG&E, the prehearing conference and our workout with Edison.  Can we have one call that you includes all who need to be involved?  (I'm thinking, Steffes, you, Tribolet, me. Mellencamp, Wanda, Sue). That make sense?

Let me know.  Easiest thing would  likely be to set up a call-in number (I'm mobile today).  Thanks alot.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 1:23 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Edison meet and confer call

i'll conference you in.  we don't have a call-in number.  what number should i call?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 1:12 PM
To:	Williams, Robert C.
Subject:	Edison meet and confer call

Hi Bob:

Could you please leave on my voicemail the call-in number to discuss the meet and confer call that's happening with Edison?  When exactly is that meeting?  Is it California or Houston.  Thanks very much.

Best,
Jeff


I left Mike a message telling him that I was forwarding this to you and that
someone on your team would verify this information and get  back to him.  His
note asks for info back by Friday the 17th - Friday is the 15th and I assume
that is the deadline that he intends.  Thanks.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000 11:40 AM
---------------------------

Michael Tribolet@ENRON
12/13/2000 07:27 PM
To: Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Perry Gas Companies, Inc.

We need to prepare the Proof of Claim in the Perry Gas Companies, Inc.
bankruptcy.     The debtor's  Schedule F filed  29-Sep-2000, with balances as
of the bankruptcy filing date of 28-Aug-2000,  indicated the amount of our
claims:

Creditor
       Amount
Clinton Energy Management Services               $   702,150.00
Enron Energy Services                                            $5,387,076.11
Enron North America
$1,948,233.60

I need by the close of business Friday, December 17th:

1. Please have the amounts verified by your respective area (ENA/EES).
The accuracy of these figures is quite important.
2. Copies of all the legal documentation for your transaction(s).  We will
need to file this with the court as an attachment

Please call if you have any questions.

Michael Tribolet
x33820
EB2855.


Oops. My computer sent the message before I was finished.  I continue to hope
that there is more opportunity than risk in this for us.  Price volatility is
in the news like never before and our main product is price risk management.
I know that the inquiries are up, I hope EES and ENA can get some sales out
of it.  More utilities have been approaching TNPC, EES and ENA about taking
over their merchant functions.  On the policy side, we are working the issue
on both a state and federal level.  Whether this country does anything
meaningful to deal with the current crisis comes donw to one person ... Linda
Breathitt.  Ken Lay spoke with Secy Richardson and Sen Schumer about
proposing rulemaking initiatives to FERC.  We are working the RTO process
hard elsewhere in the country and coming up with messages to arm our
remaining allies around the country.   THis is the biggest time for us on
this issue since the very beginnings in California and New Hampshire.  In the
current panic, however, we will be decimated if we are associated only with a
move to keep price caps from going into effect (I saw your message to Mona).
I am going to read the comments next, but I start off thinking we need to
avoid running headlong into the price cap movement; we may be better off
trying to co-opt the movement to get broader reform.

Hang in there.

Susan J Mara
08/11/2000 11:56 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: CA Price caps

I heard you've been raising a ruckus about our activities on the price caps
-- asking us to do more.  Thanks.  I feel as if I have been a voice in the
wilderness for the past six months when I was trying to get people to pay
attention to the bad things happening in CA and warning that the problems
(mainly a threat of reregulation) will spread elsewhere.


For emails to Health Center here is the correction to earlier message.

Health (space not underscore)Center.enron.com

will bring up choices in address book - path:   Health Center\Corp\Enron -
can then be chosen.

thanks
Sandy


Clayton,

Thanks.

Vince

	Clayton Vernon @ ENRON
	07/27/2000 03:08 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alexios
Kollaros/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Yanna Crystal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose
Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samer Takriti/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cantekin
Dincerler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Aimone/NA/Enron@Enron, Datren
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Sevil Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sofya
Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Ainsley
Gaddis/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Guiseppe
Paleologo/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita
DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, V Charles
Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SAS

to the group:

if you wish to use SAS, there are a few simple things you need to do:

1) you need to get a Unix password if you don't already have one (your user
id will be the same as on the NT network, but a different password is issued)
2) you need a program called "Exceed" on your PC.  request it from IT (you
already have this if you are already a user of LIM on the Unix platform)
3) you need an "ftp" program on your PC. you can go to www.download.com and
download one (i like wsftp)
4) Exceed is funny in the way it runs. When you invoke Exceed (or LIM
Advanced User (under Infobases) if you already have this) it will install
itself the first time, and will then "disappear" to the Taskbar. you need to
*right* click on the taskbar on Exceed, and then choose "Tools" and "Client
Startup" and then "New."

You will enter a box which should already be set for REXEC and an XWindow
emulation. You need to specify the Host Type as Sun, enter your User Name and
Password, set the Host Name to:

capers.ect.enron.com

and then, on the Command Line, type the following (carefully):

/usr/openwin/bin/xterm -display @D

Then, use the file menu to Save this as capers.xs and then click on the Run!
menu. within a second or two, a window will open up with you logged into the
serve capers. You are now on a Unix server, and the directory is your home
directory. From here, if you simply type "sas" the 3 windows for an
interactive session with SAS should open on your desktop. You are in business.

5) you also need to install your ftp. follow the procedures with the
software, and then create a new session called "enron" where you choose as
the server simply "earth" (do not add any further descriptors such as
.enron.com). supply your user name and *unix* password, check the "remember
password" box, and the default communication setups should be correct (eg,
host type as "automatic detect").

when you invoke ftp and connect to enron, it will put you in your home
directory on the Unix system, the same directory your xwindow comes up in
under Exceed.

if you have any problems, i'll be happy to help

Clayton

PS i have a complete set of new SAS manuals i am happy to loan out if you'll
just write your name down when you take them.


My apologies, Rosalee.  Not sure what happened.  Let's try again.  Let me
know if you're still having problems.

Best,
Jeff


You'll like it.  Do you want to meet by the garage?

Kay

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/20/2000 10:58 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Opportunities at ENA

Fox Diner as it's peaked my curiosity.  Unless you suggest otherwise

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	11/20/2000 10:53 AM

		 To: Carlos Sole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Opportunities at ENA

Dan just dumped me, so we can go any where you want.  Do you have a
preference?

Kay

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/20/2000 10:38 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Opportunities at ENA

see you then


I'll take a wild guess about what will be in the plan.

1. Marshall Law
2. Nationalize the grid.
3. International energy crimes trial.

	Mona L Petrochko
	11/15/2000 07:42 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
rcarroll@bracepatt.com
		 Subject: Re: Gov. Davis' Dec 1 Plan

No rumors from the AB 1890 group either.  Seems like the plan is being
developed by a select few and very close to the vest.

Susan J Mara
11/15/2000 06:01 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, rcarroll@bracepatt.com
cc:

Subject: Gov. Davis' Dec 1 Plan

The Governor obviously picked Dec 1 so they could review everyone's filings
from the 22nd.  I've asked our lobbying firm -- governmental Advocates -- to
see what they can find out about the plan.  I haven't even heard any rumors.


Please mad GRLK/St. Clair to the same curve that TCPL/St. Clair GL is mapped,
CGPR-St. Clair.  Thanks for your help.
PL


I need to do my reviews before I go to Hawaii.  Please write out instructions
on how I can do them on the computer.