ATTENTION:
Haas Computing Services has been made aware of a software problem that has
occurred with the IZIO system.   The problem has caused  some of, and in
some cases, all of the course information that had been previously
populated, to be deleted.  We are aware of this problem and are attempting
to resolve is ASAP.  We ask that, if you are affected, that you send an
email message to the helpdesk with your course information that is
missing.   Also, we ask that you give us the opportunity to resolve this
problem, and NOT come to the Computing Services Front Desk, with a deluge
of complaints.

We understand your frustration, and are working quickly to resolve this
matter.  Once resolved, you will receive another memo indicating
such.  Again, thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Darrell C. Alder
Haas Computing Services
Helpdesk Manager
510.642.0434
------------------------------------------------------------------
HERE NOW! Help is just a click away at http://helpdesk.haas.berkeley.edu/ .
You can request service or follow up on a request whenever you need to.
Your request is captured in your own words so nothing is lost in
translation. The web based system permits you to request service from
anywhere you have access to a browser, even if your email is not working!
Bookmark the location now! Or, if on site, just type "helpdesk" in the
"Location" or "Address" field of your web browser and you'll be immediately
transported to the Service Request System. Use the login name and password
that you use to initially get on your computer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HelpDesk Coordinator                                  E-Mail: helpdesk@haas
Haas Computing Services                                      Phone: 642-0434
S300D Student Services Bldg.                                FAX:
642-4769
                 Hours of operation are 8AM-5PM Monday-Friday
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Theriot, Kim S.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:22 PM
To:	Diamond, Russell
Subject:	AIG Energy Trading Financial Info.

See attached.


SK - I have this on your schedule.  mm

Okay, folks let's try this again!

This conference call has been re-scheduled as follows:

Please consider this notice & confirmation of a conference call, per Jeff
Dasovich and Steve Kean,
with Laura Tyson and Marybeth Shubert, Berkeley Business School, as noted
below:

 Date:    Thursday, May 10th
 Time:  2:30 PM PDT/4:30 PM Central
 Call-in No.: 1-888-296-1938
 Code No.: 529952
 Jeff only (as host): 850022

Thanks in advance for your participation,

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA

---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 05/09/2001 02:51
PM ---------------------------

	Joseph Alamo
	05/08/2001 05:44 PM

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron,
schub@socrates.berkeley.edu
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron

Subject: Conference Call Confirmation

Please consider this notice & confirmation of a conference call, per Jeff
Dasovich and Steve Kean,
with Laura Tyson and Marybeth Shubert, Berkeley Business School, as noted
below:

 Date:    Wednesday, May 8th
 Time:  1:30 PM PDT/3:30 PM Central
 Call-in:  1-888-476-3752
 Code No.: 735045
 Jeff only (as host): 780468

Thanks in advance for your participation,

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA
(415) 782-7841

Marybeth Schubert <schub@socrates.berkeley.edu> on 05/08/2001 06:25:37 PM
To: joseph.alamo@enron.com
cc:

Subject: conference call with Steve Cain and Jeff Dasovitch

Joseph:

Laura Tyson and I will be available for a conference call with Steve
Cain and Jeff Dasovitch tomorrow afternoon at 1:30 pacific.  Dean
Tyson will be at the Westin William Penn Hotel: 412-281-7100.  I will
be at 505-820-6721.  I'd appreciate it if you would coordinate
details with Jeff.  Marybeth


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Freight Markets
Enron Freight Markets signed four capacity contracts with three new counterparties to finish the third quarter.  Three of the capacity deals were for options that will allow EFM to take up to 49 million truck miles along 11 different shipping lanes through 2003.  The contracts will be used to meet current customer needs, as well as to expand the foundation of products offered by the mid-marketing and trading groups.

IN THE NEWS
The Fittest 50: Winner Profile
Power the Web: Using a small energy trade site as a springboard, Enron transformed itself into a master of e-markets.
Darwin Magazine BY DAINTRY DUFFY
http://www.darwinmag.com/read/100101/power.html <http://www.darwinmag.com/read/100101/power.html>

Enron launched its online energy marketplace in November 1999. Still, many longtime customers were wary of the change. "I had one guy that I was talking to for three to four months, and I couldn't get him to trade online," recalls Larry Gagliardi, director of marketing for the crude oil and refined products business. "Finally, I talked him through it: 'Put the little arrow on the sale price, click and you're done,'" Gagliardi says. "The next day he did five trades with us. The next week he did 20. The following week he did 40 in one day, and I had to call him and tell him to slow down."

An extreme case of love at first site? Perhaps. But the simplicity-and the lack of red tape and paperwork-of EnronOnline has rocketed the company to success.

Since launching the site, Fittest 50 winner Enron has not only revolutionized the energy markets but pioneered the Web as a supremely easy place to buy and sell commodities. EnronOnline now encompasses 30 commodity markets, from forest products and plastics to broadband and weather futures, and currently averages a whopping $3 billion in transactions per day. "EnronOnline is one of the leading examples of the right way to apply technology," says Bruce D. Temkin, group director at Cambridge, Mass.-based Forrester Research. "While other dotcoms tried to invent new business models, or made them up, Enron has done a great job of [using technology to] extend its business model."

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - James Fernie
EIM   - Carol Tracy, Chris Auderer
ENA  - John Morris, Stephanie Stehling, Chris Cramer, Bret Wells, Susan Laird

NUGGETS & NOTES

Mark your lunch calendars now!
The next EWS Brown Bag Lunch is set for Thursday, October 18 at 11:30 AM. The topic is enhancing your market analysis and decision-making capabilities with customized geographic applications.  Sounds like a mouthful, but it's very interesting and useful!  The speakers are The Map Guys - Keith Fraley and Peter Hoyt.  RSVP via email to Kathie Grabstald or call x 3-9610.

The Portland and San Francisco offices donated over $4300 for September 11 relief efforts ($12,900+ after Enron match).  They accepted donations for a week and the money went to The Red Cross, United Way 9/11 Fund, NY Firefighters & Police Widows & Children's Fund, and the Cantor-Fitzgerald Relief Fund.  Thank you generous Enron employees!

EnronOnline Figures

	Below are the latest figures for EnronOnline as of October 8

	?       Total Life to Date Transactions > 1,525,000
?       Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $850 billion

Enron Wholesale Services Best Practice Tips
MCI WorldCom is Enron's Primary Worldwide Telecommunications Provider
MCI WorldCom provides long distance services, calling cards and data serviced to Enron's worldwide locations.  As a result of this agreement, Enron will recognize savings of $18 million over the next two years.  Initial implementation has begun; look for information on the transference of existing telecommunication services to be distributed in the next 30 days.

For information on commercial/contractual aspects of the agreement, please contact Tom Moore (GSS) at 713-345-5552.

INFORMATION TOOLS YOU CAN USE

experienceENRON ...Your partner in optimizing customer visits.
Don't let the opportunity to get your customer to Enron result in only a meeting with a tour or two.  Give them an experience that will have them leave knowing there's no other company to partner with then Enron!  Utilizing experienceENRON's proven process and resources can minimize your sales cycle and maximize your overall numbers.  For more information, call or visit our website.

        Contacts:               http://experience.enron.com <http://experience.enron.com>
        Carrie Robert           713-853-3522
        Jennifer Brockwell      713-345-7358

eBiz
For news you can really use, click on the eBiz link below to catch up on the latest stories from around the globe.
<http://home.enron.com/pubs/ebiz/issues/082401/ <http://home.enron.com/pubs/ebiz/issues/082401/>>

Houston's ETV
Are you interested in running a segment?  Contact Courtney Votaw, Internal Communications
X 3-9390, Questions about ETV?  Send them a note at etv@enron.com.

We are looking for speakers for the Brown Bag Lunch Series.
We would love to hear from every team!  So, if you have just completed a deal, are working on a special project or are a member of a team that you think would be of interest to the EWS staff at large, then contact Kathie Grabstald at x 3-9610 and we'll get you signed up to share your news with all of us.

Note:  All sessions take place in EB 5C2 from 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM.

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only and should not be disclosed.

<Embedded Paintbrush Picture>


Errol,

Could you take a look at these two Option/Call deals that successfully
bridged into Tagg( 750242/QK1859 & 750296/QK1897).  Also, take note that the
swaps did not bridge into Tagg as requested ( 750297 & 750243), and will
remain in failed status until further notice.  Everything looks great on our
end!

One deal failed simply because John Arnold logged in as the buyer and acted
as the seller.  This only happened once. ( 750209 Option, and 750210 Swap)

Torrey,

What is the plan for all swaps that have been requested to end up in failed
status ?

 ( Look under Torrey and Errol Tab)

Thanks
TARA


are you looking for a job here or something?


Please note the change in time.


Due to the all employees meeting tomorrow at 10am Central, I would like to try to reschedule our weekly call.  My schedule is open the rest of the day.

How about 3pm tomorrow?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Ken Lay@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 6:29 AM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject:	All-Employee Meeting

I want to remind you about our All-Employee Meeting this Tuesday, Oct. 23, at 10 a.m. Houston time at the Hyatt Regency.  We obviously have a lot to talk about.  Last week we reported third quarter earnings.  We have also been the subject of media reports discussing transactions with LJM, a related party previously managed by our chief financial officer.  Today, we announced that we received a request for information from the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding related party transactions.

I know you will have a number of questions about these issues and events, which I will address.   As usual, I will be as candid as I can.  I will do my best to provide answers and talk about where we go from here.  I encourage each of you to attend or tune in tomorrow.


Rod,
    I just signed the confidentiality agreement and will track down the ENA contracts asap.  I'll let you know when I have them.

Dan


Martin,

No problem. Please, ask Stinson as well.

Vince

From: Martin Lin@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 01/24/2001 01:46 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: dinner with Lasdon

I thought that since Chonawee has an optimization background, he would be
good to have him go to dinner with Dr. Lasdon on Thrusday as well.  Would
this be fine?

Thanks,
Martin


Shirley,

Please, can you coordinate this?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000
02:40 PM ---------------------------

"Oliver Bennett" <oliver@risk.co.uk> on 05/25/2000 08:25:12 AM
Please respond to "Oliver Bennett" <oliver@risk.co.uk>
To: <jefferid@kochind.com>, <vkamins@enron.com>, <sbramlet@utilicorp.com>
cc:
Subject: Risk 2000 panel discussion

Dear All,
?
Would like to set a conference call to discuss  content for the panel
discussion at Risk 2000 in Boston on 14 June. Perhaps I  can suggest
wednesday 31 may at noon EST. I'm on London time and am quite  flexible if
you would like to do earlier or indeed on another day.
?
The panellists are -
?
Vince Kaminski, Enron Corp
Richard Jefferis, Koch Energy Trading
Steven Bramlet, Aquila
?
The discussion topic is 'effectively applying  weather derivatives'
?
I think we need to establish a series of  questions around which to
facilitate discussion. We currently don't have a  moderator and perhaps one
of you could take this role on.
?
I look forward to hearing from you.
?
Thanks, Oliver
?
?
?
Direct: +44 (0)20 7484 9880
?
Risk Publications, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y  4RX
Fax: +44 (0)20 7484 9800? Email: oliver@risk.co.uk
www.riskpublications.com


Thanks for the invite, but I have class.  She have a job yet?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:28 PM
To: 'PP'; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: colleen

Colleen is coming over for dinner next Tuesday and we are going to make some
lavish dinner from gourmet recipes.  Let me know if you guys want to be
there so we can plan and get enough for you.

-C

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)


Has anyone given any thought to the creation of a new company to enter into
the CRRA/Fuel Cell purchase/sale transactions?  Any names to suggest?  If
Enron is going to be the contractor as contemplated by the PDA, I would
expect to use a limited liablity company and not ENA.

Please advise.

Kay


Looks like we'll be staying the night and leaving in the AM.


FYI.  The agenda for the legislative oversight committee's gas hearing
tomorrow includes two Brattle Group consultants, Paul Carpenter and Matt
O'Loughlin. They will make up the first panel, titled, "California's High
Natural Gas Prices: Market Power and Other Factors."

In California's gas wars, Edison hired these folks--Carpenter in particular--
to show that SoCalGas has considerable market power in California and abuses
it.  (Edison was a long-time, very unhappy gas customer of SoCalGas', until
it sold off its power plants.  The animosity remains, however.)  Should be
interesting to see where the committe goes with that panel.

CA PUC lawyer, Harvey Morris, is the sole witness on the second panel.
Harvey is zealous in his assertions regarding market power in interestate
markets serving California and is the PUC's lead attorney on such matters at
FERC.

I plan on attending the hearing.

It's likely that I will also be attending a hearing on price caps at CMA's
offices in the afternoon.

Best,
Jeff


Looks fine.

	Britt Davis/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/25/2001 07:48 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: david.best@clyde.co.uk@SMTP@enronXgate, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, James
P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FW: PACIFIC VIRGO

 Richard,

 Some time ago, you and I recommended to John Nowland, and he agreed, that we
didn't have a case against the ship or the supplier of this product ("Elang
Crude, fit for export"), but that we would try for a quick settlement with
the cargo underwriter.  Attached is a draft of the proposed letter to the
cargo underwriters.  David Best, Matt Lee, and I have reviewed and approved
it and recommend it to you.  The red-lining will of course be cleaned up.  It
will either be signed by Jim Studdert of our insurance group, or sent by him
with a transmittal letter signed by him.

 Please let me know whether the letter is acceptable to you.  Thanks.

 Britt

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Helen.Godel@clyde.co.uk@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Helen+2EGodel+40clyde+2Eco+2Euk+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 3:49 AM
To: Davis, Britt
Subject: PACIFIC VIRGO

Britt -

I have now identified the e-mail and attachment to which you referred in
your message on Friday.  For some reason it is not on my system but I now
have the hard copy from the file.  The covering message was very brief:

     "I attach an amended draft with the amendments highlighted in black."

I attach the draft hereto and apologise for the delay.

With best regards,
Helen Godel.

(See attached file: LET Underwriters - PACIFIC VIRGO.DOC)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged.
If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or
store or copy the information.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this e-mail, please contact the
sender or the London IT Department on +44 (020) 7623 1244.

Clyde & Co
51 Eastcheap, London, EC3M 1JP
Tel: +44 (020) 7623 1244, Fax: +44 (020) 7623 5427

Clyde & Co Guildford
Beaufort House, Chertsey Street, Guildford, GU1 4HA
Tel: +44 (0) 1483 555 555, Fax: +44 (0) 1483 567 330

E-Mail: postmaster@clyde.co.uk, Internet: http://www.clydeco.com

 - LET Underwriters - PACIFIC VIRGO.DOC


Mark

Caminus took out reference to EOL.   Would this be too broad?   How can we accommodate their wishes below?
-john

-----Original Message-----
From: Masiello, Ralph [mailto:ralph.masiello@caminus.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:44 AM
To: Allario, John
Subject: RE: meeting & NDA

Our attorney was fine with the NDA except that by restricting it to
information about the Enron On Line website, it would not cover material
which Caminus might disclose to you in that meeting.

Here it is back with a simple change to make it symmetric


I've just learned that this is a "West" deal for the sale of the LV Co Gen
units.

This deal was described as being the same as the Intergen deal.  King &
Spalding helped me on that one, and when I thought this was an East deal I
contacted Keffer for a conflicts check (there is none).  I haven't gone to
Mark with it yet, though.

We have forms, etc for this, and I'm happy to provide whatever support I
can.  Please advise as to how you would like to proceed.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/27/2001 12:39
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/27/2001 11:32 AM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Thome,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Panda Energy

Folks:

I just got off the phone with Lee Johnson at GE. I described the overall deal
to him ("Intergen" style deal with the current 4 LV Cogen units, and a
purchase of 4 additional units as a replacement), but did not disclose that
the counterparty is Panda. Lee is totally on board, and thought this would be
a great transaction. Based on this, I think our GE risk is minimal, which
means that our primary commercial focus needs to be on making sure Panda is
prepared to transact, and if they remain as interested, making sure we
proceed with as simple a transaction as possible.

I would suggest that we have an all hands conference call to discuss the
transaction as soon as possible.

Fred-could you please contact everyone and set this up? I'm available all day
today, and tomorrow to 3 PM EST.

As soon as I get the revised proposal from Lee, I will forward it to the
group.

Regards,

Ben


I am copying Mary Nell Browning who has been the in-house lawyer assisting on ECTRIC matters.

Alan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rogers, Daniel R.
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:39 PM
To:	Anderson, Peter N.
Cc:	Aronowitz, Alan; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Greenfield - ECTRI Loan Note

Peter,

The details of the promissory note ("Loan Note 2002") from Greenfield to ECTRI in payment of agreed interest rate swap breakage costs in connection with the November 2001 Greenfield equity sale/LAKSHMI vessel financing workout transaction are as follows:

Maker: 			Greenfield Shipping Company Limited
Holder:			Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp.
Guarantor: 		Mitsui OSK Lines, Ltd.
Date of Note: 		November 20, 2001
Principal Amount:	US$12,720,000.00
Interest Rate: 		5% per annum (based on 360 day year)
ECTRI Swap Deal No.:	M148198

Repayment Schedule*:
	1st Payment:	January 31, 2002 -- US$561,621.52 (includes principal and interest)
	2nd Payment:	February 28, 2002 -- US$561,621.52 (includes principal and interest)
	3rd Payment:	March 29, 2002 -- US$561,621.52 (includes principal and interest)
	Final Payment:	April 30, 2002 -- remaining balance of principal plus accrued interest.

	* Notwithstanding the foregoing schedule, the Loan Note is repayable in full upon refinancing of the vessel by Greenfield.

Hope this helps.  Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.  I'm copying Enron lawyers Alan Aronowitz and Sara Shackleton on this note so that they are also aware of the details of this ECTRI receivable and the fact that MOL appear to be arranging payment on behalf of Greenfield to ECTRI (at least for the January and February 2002 instalment obligations).

Kind regards,
Dan Rogers


Please advise how to respond to GE.  Kay has the change order for final
review and approval, and Jody Pierce's group has the invoice.

----- Forwarded by Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/23/2001 12:21 PM
-----

	jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com
	03/23/2001 10:58 AM

		 To: bbarto@enron.com, matthew.tezyk@enron.com
		 cc: gary.chapman@ps.ge.com, sharon.torre@ps.ge.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com
		 Subject: Blue Dog Max storage

Attached is a copy of the invoice that we issued for the storage of Unit #1.
This invoice has not been paid.  I believe you are waiting for the signing
of the contract change order.  Neither of us expected this process to take
this long.

As we have an agreement that the equipment will be stored, and we agree on
the price of the storage, I am requesting that this invoice be paid
immediately.

>  <<Blue Dog N01G8299.xls>>
>
Thank You,

Jeff
Global Power Plant Systems
518-385-0663
518-381-1513 (fax)

 - Blue Dog N01G8299.xls


Ron Howard:

I just confirmed back with Shirley Vauter that 1:30 PM -3:00 PM on Tuesday,
December 12th is fine for the meeting between Larry Kellner, Jeff Shankman,
and their teams.  Thank-you for your flexibility in rescheduling this meeting
from December 11th to December 12th per Jeff Shankman's request.

I will follow up shortly with logistical details.

Sarah-Joy Hunter
Enron Corporation
Global Strategic Sourcing
(713)-345-6541


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Option Candlesticks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/candlesticks51.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Have we thought of letting traders access EOL via WAP or having a more friendly format for hand held devices,  Thereby keeping more eyeballs and keeping ourselves as the platform of choice due to convienience?  No more having to stop trading when at Henley or Wimbledon!

Richard


-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Schwalbe [mailto:caschwalbe@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:27 AM
To: mcuilla@enron.com; mcuilla@houston.rr.com
Subject: YO MARTY

Hey Man!

Just got back from my climbing trip.  Headed out to the Canary Islands for
10 days then I?ll be coming over to the states on the 21st or so.  Needless
to say, not going to be able to have you over.  Wish you could have come
over sooner when Donny and Vinlarek were here it was great.  I?m not going
anywhwere and will be here next summer and the one afeter that and the one
after that....  Don?t know when you need to use your vacation time by, but
maybe we can go sking this winter.

Like I said, I will be in Texas from the 21st to the 1st of October or so,
then off to Maine to see my aunt.  Hopefully we?ll see each other ( I need
to get my shit out of your closet and into my storage place anyways!!,
Thanks and sorry about that!)

Say hi to Zooey for me and see you in a few weeks hopefully.

CAS

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


?

?http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=65000704
 - OpinionJournal - Featured Article.url


Please note this is to be done on the Canadian Industrial Master Form.

Thanks
Wendy
---------------------- Forwarded by Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001
03:49 PM ---------------------------

From:  Wendy Conwell
   03/14/2001 02:01 PM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, stephanie.panus@enron.com, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul
Radous/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Calgary Winter Club

Mary,

Please find attached the credit worksheet for Calgary Winter Club.  Please
call with questions or comments.

Wendy


JD approved referral of this to Keffer et al.

Fred is anxious to get something to the counterparty - his preference is
yesterday.  I would think that a discussion with Fred about the deal might be
in order today, even if by phone.  What is your availability?  John/Carolyn,
have you had a chance to review the draft I sent you, and do you have any
notions about how to structure this deal?  Is the format ok?  Can we  make it
more seller friendly without being ridiculous?

When the initial draft is ready, it will need to go to Matt Gockerman (ENA
Tax) and Herman Manis (structuring accountant).

Ciao,

ckm


Thanks for all your hard work and Happy Birthday!

Lunch will be provided on Friday, March 16, by Tim Belden and Chris Calger to
everyone on the floor as a thanks for all you've done for Enron this month.
We'll also celebrate this month's birthdays by having sweet treats for
everyone.


Hello Sally,

This e-mail is to confirm the message I left for you earlier this morning.  I have attached the speaking sessions below.  Please let me know as soon as possible the session that you would be interested in conducting for the NABA Conference.  Also, two of your employees are interested in participating at the conference Mark McClure and Errol McLauglin.  You have a total of four conferences passes to utilize for your group.  Please let me know if you would like them to attend for career development purposes.  They are both willing to recruit at the conference.  NABA is expecting over 2,000 professional participants this year.  Thank you for your support for the organization.  This will be a wonderful new partnership for Enron and your organization.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Meliza Evason
Associate, HR
X57855


Restore financial balance to your life. Please fill out the following form so a certified counselor can provide you with your financial options. Your information will be kept strictly confidential.

http://www.eloangroup.com/

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?funnymoney:10
* Enter your email address (alewis@ect.enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "funnymoney:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address alewis@ect.enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: alewis@ect.enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:1c.1ctb.c796m


Please see additional comments in Section 2.4 of the Declaration of
Covenants.
I missed this until this morning but the number of votes per parcel does not
account for the propety to be conveyed by deed to the POA.  This includes the
road, the drainage ditches and the pond.  Parcel 1,should lose between 2 and
3 acres, Parcel 2 would lose about 1 acre and Parcel 3 would lose about 10
acres.

The decision not give Parcel 3 voting rights or cause Parcel 3 to be assessed
was negotiated and agreed to by Enron and Cooney Midway Groves.  However,
since having this property dedicated as the open lands in perputity to meet
the requirements of the entire 117 acre PNRD, perhaps the POA should be
oblicated to pay any costs associated with this land: property taxes,
insurance, maintenance etc.  The only thing we could do with this land is
lease it out for grazing, which may allow us to keep an ag exemption.


Bruce

I had quite a crazy week.  Give me a call the next time you are in town or if you are still in town.  I would love to get together.

John


OK, so the classes start this week.  The first one will be on what to look
for in a P&L and MiniBench to prove reasonableness.  Will Kelly and I will
present the class.  We have a few items we want to go over, but I think the
most beneficial part will be individual questions.  So bring them if you have
them.  We are have split the entire Risk team into two groups.  Our breakout
is as follows:

 Group1   Group2
 Carole    Jennifer
 Jason    Anne
 Chris

Group 1 will meet this Wednesday @ 11:30am and Group 2 this Thursday @
11:30am.  We will have Chick-Fil-A for lunch.  Thanks.

DG


>  ATTENTION All ISO USERS
>
> The work on the Siemens Phone Switch has been completed by MCI.  Please
> call the ISO Support Center @ ext. 2309 if you have any questions.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation.
>
> ISO Support Center
> 916-351-2309 or 888-889-0450
>  ISO Support Center Mission:  The ISO Support Center is dedicated to
> providing World Class Customer Service to the California ISO.
>
>
>
>


Here's a couple of clauses from some other contracts:

From ABB contract:

Maximum Liability.  Seller,s maximum aggregate liability for claims by
Purchaser arising out of Seller,s performance of this Agreement whether
arising from tort (including negligence), breach of contract or any other
cause of action is limited to one hundred percent (100%) of the Purchase
Amount; provided, however, that the foregoing limitation of liability of
Seller shall not apply to the following:

(i) under Article XX (Indemnification);

(ii) under Article XXIV (Liens and Claims);

(iii) Section 3.8(a) and 3.8(b), (Compliance with Governmental Rules);

(iv) Section 5.2 (Taxes);

(v) Article XIX obligation to maintain insurance;

(vi) arising from or related to environmental harm caused by an action or
inaction of Seller, its agents, employees or Vendors during the performance
of the Scope of Work;

(vii) resulting from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Seller,
their agents, employees or Vendors;

(viii) patent or copyright infringement in accordance with Section 15.2, or
(ix) Article XXI (Non-Disclosure of Information).

which liabilities shall not be limited.  Additionally, any liability of
Seller provided for by the proceeds of the insurance maintained pursuant to
Article XIX shall not be counted toward any of the foregoing limitations of
liability.

The indemnity language in the ABB contract probably wouldn't work.  I'll look
around.


Sorry, it has been a gong show around here. I'll write back soon.

Chris


David,

Yes, I got some cash for you.
Please, give me a call Tuesday.

Vince

"Walkup, David C (HOUSTONAS AS 582)" <dwalkup@pclient.ml.com> on 12/04/2000
08:32:44 AM
To: "'Vincent Kaminski'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Options

Good morning, Vince.

Just touching base with you.  Are you ready to deposit some money and start
looking at some equity investments?  EM me or call and we can get together.
David C. Walkup
Sr. Financial Consultant
713-658-1685
800-456-9712
____________________________________________________________

CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
be intercepted by a third party.  For your protection, avoid sending
identifying information, such as account, Social Security or card numbers to
us or others.  Further, do not send time-sensitive, action-oriented
messages, such as transaction orders, fund transfer instructions, or check
stop payments, as it is our policy not to accept such items electronicall


(d) In the event of a termination as provided herein, the City and PBEC shall
be relieved of all obligations hereunder and shall unconditionally execute
and record an instrument in the Public Records of Broward County, Florida,
releasing each other from all obligations hereunder.


Surprise Cellar Sale -- Exclusive For Members Only

Don't want to wait around for post-holiday bargains? We can relate.
That's why we're offering up to 20 percent off a limited selection of
themed wines, right in the heat of the holiday season.

We've pulled together our Top 12 wine recommendations under the
following themes: Undiscovered Gems, Tour de France, Anything
but Napa, and California Nuggets.

And, if you order all 12 bottles in any one of these categories,
you'll see it's priced to include an additional 10 percent case
discount... a total of nearly one-third savings!

Maybe best of all, as a wine.com newsletter subscriber, you get first
crack at these great deals. Remember, we'll be letting everyone in on
this sale December 14, so shop now!

Click on any category below for more information on this
special sale.

_____________________________________________________________________

Undiscovered Gems

Tour de France

Anything but Napa

California Nuggets

Void where prohibited by law. Supplies are limited.

_____________________________________________________________________

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS NEWSLETTER, go to:
http://wine1.m0.net/m/u/vin/vv.asp?e=jdasovic%40enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
08:46 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 03/13/2001 11:58:28 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc: VKaminski@aol.com
Subject: Rice

 - rice0315.ppt


Please make sure that your things are packed and ready to be moved before you leave today.  The move should start first thing tomorrow morning!

Please let me know if you need any help packing and I will be more than happy to help you.

Thank you,

Amanda Rybarski
Gas Fundamentals
Office: (713) 853-4384
Fax: (713) 646-8453
Pager: (877) 482-0772
Cell: (713) 560-0934


"When the crypt doors creak and the tombstones quake, spooks come out for a swinging wake. Happy haunts materialize and begin to vocalize. Grim Grinning Ghosts come out to socialize."  Welcome, foolish mortals, to our Halloween jamboree.

The spirits will materialize only if you fill your ghostly retreat with "wall-to-wall creeps and hot and cold running chills." We have everything you need to create a frightfully fun Disney Halloween this holiday.
http://go-disneystore.com/find/9187a

P.S. Don't forget to preorder Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs DVD to receive our exclusive bonus.  Hurry, offer ends October 8, 2001!
http://go-disneystore.com/find/9187b

Find the Disney Store nearest you
http://go-disneystore.com/find/9187c

Please click on this URL for a full graphic version of this message
http://go-disneystore.com/find/9187d

NOTE: If you choose to unsubscribe from future DisneyStore.com e-mails, click on this URL or cut and paste it into the address bar of your browser.
http://register.disney.go.com/unsub/tgeacco@enron.com/L5/store.html

This e-mail was sent to tgeacco@enron.com.

(c) Disney.  All Rights Reserved.


Hey Jeff.
You didn't tell me who you're in touch with from  GUCI.  I'm curious to know.  Jen


Tracy:  It's fine with me.  Let's schedule a time next week on Monday.  The
lawyers will be gone Wed - Fri next week.  Name a time.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 09:52 AM -----

	"Yaish, Yair (OGC)" <YYaish@exchange.ml.com>
	04/24/2001 07:29 PM

		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: "Transfer" provision

I am prapring for a trip to Denver tomorrow.  Can we push this off until next
week.

Yair Yaish
Office of General Counsel
AEGM
2-7955

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 7:44 PM
To: yyaish@exchange.ml.com
Cc: Tracy.Ngo@enron.com
Subject: "Transfer" provision

Yair:

Tracy and I would like to discuss the "Transfer" issue with you tomorrow,
if possible.  We think this should be a short discussion (maybe 10
minutes).  How is 1 pm NY time, tomorrow Wednesday April 25?  This seems to
be the most convenient for both of us, but we will entertain times before 3
pm NY time.

Would you please email your response?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Could you please get me some post it notes, various sizes, cool colors
preferred.

Thanks!


Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Kristin Walsh
(713) 853-9510


Karen,

When I asked MT about exp. smoothing she said that exp smoothing is used for smth else and not for correlations. She suggested though that I run the correlations between the changes in prices as that will remove the trends in data (if there is any trend) for a more accurate corr. coefficient. That is what I did in the spreadsheet. As a result correlation coefficients were much lower.

By the way, how is your son doing?
Monika

-----Original Message-----
From: Carter, Karen E.
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Causholli, Monika; Allan, David
Subject: RE: Correlations between NBSK price and paper grades prices

Monika,

Just curious, are these the correllations with or without exponential smoothing?  Thanks.

KC

-----Original Message-----
From: Causholli, Monika
Sent: Thu 8/9/2001 10:20 AM
To: Bryja, James; Allan, David; Carter, Karen E.
Cc:
Subject: Correlations between NBSK price and paper grades prices

Jim,

Attached is the file that contains the correlation analysis between the NBSK price and the price for paper grades.

Let me know if you want to further discuss this.

thanks,
Monika <<Corr.doc>>


Attached please find the Transaction Agreement for the April 2001 through
October 2001 physical natural gas transaction.  Please call me at (713)
853-5705.  The Swap confirmation is being prepared by Joe Hunter.  His number
is (713) 853-3316.

Stacy Dickson


Clayton,

Please, register for  4 & 5  Wellhead to BurnerTip  course.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99
08:08 AM ---------------------------

Ernie@ENRON
12/14/99 06:26 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All ENA Domestic Employees
cc:
Subject: Development Center - Jan./Feb. 2000 Course Schedule

The Development Center would like to thank all the employees who participated
in making 1999 a successful year.  Below is a list of courses being offered
in January and February.   Please note that beginning January 2000 most
courses being offered through the Development Center will be charged to your
company and RC.

Please enroll through the Development Center (Ernie)  or contact the
Development Center at (713) 853-0357.

January
 4 & 5  Wellhead to BurnerTip
 6 & 7  Basics of Risk Management
 11 & 12 Derivatives I
 13 & 14 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance
 25 & 26 Derivatives II
 27 & 28 Applied Finance

February
 3 & 4  Structuring Natural Gas
 8 & 9  Derivatives I
 10 & 11 Derivatives II
 15 & 16 Wellhead to BurnerTip
 17 & 18 Basics of Risk Management
 24 & 25 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance
 29 & Mar. 1 Power Marketing


At Christian Yoder's request, I am forwarding the message and attachment
below.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jan M King/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 08:05 AM
---------------------------
From: Tim Belden on 11/17/2000 04:39 PM
To: Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Chairman Hoecker's questions from Nov. 1 hearing

---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000 03:41 PM
---------------------------

Lysa Akin
11/17/2000 04:30 PM
To: GFergus@brobeck.com, mday@gmssr.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
D Steffes/NA/Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Chairman Hoecker's questions from Nov. 1 hearing

Sue Mara - please forward this to the EES group.

If you feel I have inadvertently left someone off this distribution list,
please forward!  Thanks!

Lysa Akin
Ass't to Mary Hain
503/464-7927
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 11/17/2000 04:34 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>
11/17/2000 03:00 PM

To: <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>,
<marcie.milner@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<snovose@enron.com>
cc: "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Chairman Hoecker's questions from Nov. 1 hearing

Attached is a list of questions Chairman Hoecker has proposed to parties that
spoke at the Nov. 1 (I believe FERC means the 9th) meeting.  All but No. 3
are  directed to Enron and the responses are due on Wednesday the 22nd.

 - EL00-95.1


This one is particularly amazing ...

Electricity traders' tech habits get scrutiny
Posted at 10:23 p.m. PDT Sunday, June 10, 2001
BY JENNIFER BJORHUS

Mercury News

State officials investigating California's extraordinary energy prices are
zeroing in on how energy traders use the technology tools of their profession
-- from e-mail and specialized software to Internet energy data sites and
online trading floors.

This technology may be key, they say, to helping traders acquire the intimate
knowledge needed to manipulate California's troubled energy market. With
minute-to-minute knowledge of market conditions, some traders went even
further, two lawsuits charge, illegally coordinating bids and sending
electricity prices to record-breaking levels.

The state Attorney General's Office has subpoenaed from power generators
software used to formulate bidding strategies, names of employees providing
computer support, communications with a prominent industry Web site and the
name of firms that handle computer networks.

And a state Senate committee has hired an information technology consultant
to help them look into how traders tracked patterns on the state's
Internet-based spot market, among other things.

``Once you were knowledgeable about its operations, the opportunity to game
it became pretty obvious,'' said Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Garden Grove, who chairs
the committee.

Anti-trust laws

Working together, or colluding, to fix prices is illegal and violates state
and federal anti-trust laws.

Sharing sensitive industry data, if it involved financial markets, would be
considered insider trading and would be treated far differently, said Anjali
Sheffrin, head of market analysis for the Independent System Operator, which
manages the state's power grid.

The Securities and Exchange Commission polices the nation's stock markets,
but wholesale energy trading goes largely unwatched by federal regulators.

San Diego attorney Mike Aguirre agreed with Sheffrin. Aguirre is part of a
team of lawyers who have filed two lawsuits against leading power generators
such as Dynegy, Duke Energy and Williams Energy Services.

``It's basically an embryonic kind of trading market that involves the
sharing of inside information, and the only reason they're getting away with
it is there's no SEC cop,'' he said.

Energy companies dismiss these charges as speculation.

``All of these `What ifs?' '' said Dynegy spokesman Steve Stengel. ``The fact
of the matter is we've played by the rules, we've acted ethically, we haven't
done anything wrong.''

Energy companies say the way they use technology is all above board.

``That's something that we're proud of, that we have all of the tools to do
the best possible job in the trading,'' said Paula Hall-Collins, spokeswoman
for Tulsa-based Williams Co.

Not everyone is persuaded that energy companies actually conspired to hike
prices.

Some public officials and energy industry players call the technology focus a
red herring. California's energy problems are far more fundamental, they say,
than click-happy energy traders with spreadsheets. The now-defunct California
Power Exchange, for example, was something of a sitting duck, unable to
freely shop around for the best electricity prices.

Wealth of data

Other experts believe the sheer wealth of data floating around -- from river
flows to 30-day forecasts of power line outages -- gives traders an unfair
advantage. ``That's exactly the issue,'' said Severin Borenstein, director of
the University of California Energy Institute. ``The issue is whether all
this information is actually doing more harm to competition than benefit to
the efficiency of procuring and selling power.''

The best illustration of this is a somewhat legendary Web site blunder.

In that incident, an energy industry association called the Western Systems
Coordinating Council posted highly sensitive real-time data about
transmission of extra-high voltage electricity in California.

Alarmed that such information could be used to game the market, the state's
grid operator last October demanded that the trade group take the information
off the site, which it did.

A former energy trader who spoke to the Mercury News on the condition that he
not be identified, said: ``When you can calculate exactly what a market needs
and where its surplus is going to come from, then you have the ability to
essentially fix prices. It's like a linear equation. You know exactly what
the end equation is going to be.''

At issue are how traders employ the tools that, like the telephone and fax
machine, are standard in trading electricity: software, data Web sites and
Internet energy exchanges.

Dunn and other public officials acknowledge that it isn't clear how
technology was used in suspected abuses. And no one has turned up slam-dunk
evidence of collusion.

The ISO has done extensive studies that conclude traders drove up prices
through gaming. The high prices have cost the state at least $6.7 billion
since May 2000.

``Energy traders trade information among themselves,'' the ISO's Sheffrin
charged, comparing it to insider-trading. ``These traders are calling each
other up all the time.''

The former energy trader who talked to the Mercury News agreed energy traders
as a very incestuous group.

They talk and e-mail every day. ``Sometimes many, many, many times a day,''
he said. ``Some of them have instant messaging.'' He said he believes it
could amount to ``de facto collusion.''

But proving collusion in court is extremely difficult.

The sticking point, said UC's Borenstein, is showing exactly what energy
traders did with the information.

``These guys aren't actually sitting down in a room together,'' Borenstein
said. ``They sort of watched each other and said, `Well, other firms are
keeping capacity out and we will too.' ''

The former energy trader said he doubted that investigators would prove
collusion because traders will cover their tracks. ``They're expunging
hard-drive data as we speak,'' he said. ``The documents are long gone.''

Lawsuits

Two class-action lawsuits, filed on behalf of taxpayers by San Francisco and
by Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, accuse the energy companies of colluding to
drive up prices. Neither lawsuit clearly documents how the energy companies
engaged in secretive data-sharing.

The Bustamante suit, however, targets a new Internet site for wholesale
energy trading launched last fall by heavy-hitter energy companies such as
Duke and Reliant. The Atlanta-based Web site, IntercontinentalExchange, is
one of at least a dozen such electronic trading floors that have popped up on
the Internet in the last four years. None of these trading exchanges -- which
analysts say are the wave of the future -- are regulated.

IntercontinentalExchange declined to comment since it is not a party to the
suit.

The lawsuit charges the site ``has several features that support collusive
behavior amongst market participants.''

One is that only approved traders have access to IntercontinentalExchange and
those traders can pick who they want to trade with and shut other traders
out. And more importantly, Aguirre said, the energy companies who own many of
these Web exchanges get the tremendous benefit of having a record of all the
trades.

``It gives them an enormous amount of market data that no one else has access
to,'' he said. ``It's a conduit for collusion.''

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Contact Jennifer Bjorhus at jbjorhus@sjmercury.com or (408) 920-5660.

# # #


give me a call at work sometime.....713-853-6203


Know someone who'd like to hear from you? Make their day with a Blue Mountain eCard!

Thinking of You
http://maildb.bluemountainarts.com/cgi-bin11/flo?y=eCtj0E42L20ka0wQ10Ak

Have a Hoppy Day
http://maildb.bluemountainarts.com/cgi-bin11/flo?y=eCtj0E42L20ka0wQ20Al

Hot Diggity Dog Birthday
http://maildb.bluemountainarts.com/cgi-bin11/flo?y=eCtj0E42L20ka0wQ30Am

What's Shakin'
http://maildb.bluemountainarts.com/cgi-bin11/flo?y=eCtj0E42L20ka0wQ40An

Blue Mountain...for Everything You Want to Say

P.S.  We will always have a special selection of FREE eCards!

If you prefer not to receive promotional email from
BlueMountain, please send a message to:
unsubscribe_bma@maildb.bluemountainarts.com and type "Remove"
in the subject field. This system is automated and must be
contacted from the email address you wish to have removed.


what time is the game


Independent Equity Analysis
from IDEAadvisor

In case you missed it the first time around, here it is again. The same list published on
January 18th 2002 is now available at 40% of the original price. For a one-time charge
of only $19 you can purchase IDEA's Top 10 Stock Picks. That's less than $2 per stock
recommendation. Offer valid till February 18, 2002

http://adserver.freerealtime.com/frt-offers-409a.ad

IDEA's Top 10 Stock Picks looks at 10 stocks we believe will be strong performers in
2002 and beyond -- not just from a stock growth perspective, but also as representing
companies that will lead their respective sectors and industries. Market conditions early
in 2002 are bound to be volatile, and we have chosen the stocks we believe are both fairly
valued and offer stable growth.

In our last major recommended list, released on September 28, 2001, we listed 13
stocks that we felt traded at price-to-free cash flow discounts to the market. The first nine
names on the list we noted for also carrying a higher dividend than the average S&P 500
company at 1.5% at that time; the last four we noted for their exceptionally low multiples
of price-to-free cash flow. And while emphasizing stability over growth in a time of
tremendous market uncertainty, we managed to pick 13 stocks which have yielded an
average return of almost 28% in less than four months (versus 10% growth in the S&P
500 over the same period).

http://adserver.freerealtime.com/frt-offers-409b.ad

Still not convinced? Why not SAMPLE an older Recommended List!  Our next list will
be available for Pay Per View purchase in Quarter 2, 2002.

http://adserver.freerealtime.com/frt-offers-409c.ad

About IDEAglobal: IDEAglobal is a leading global provider of independent, actionable analysis for the investment
community. IDEAglobal provides online research on equity, fixed income and foreign exchange markets in over 75
different countries, and its clients include over 700 financial institutions inclusive of the world's largest financial
institutions, hedge funds and central banks, as well as the retail investor community through IDEAadvisor.

Safe Harbor Disclaimer: Certain statements contained within the information published by IDEAglobal constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and 21E of the Exchange
Act of 1934. Such statements include, without limitation to, statements regarding business and financing, business
trends, future operating revenues and expenses. Although, at the time these statements are made by IDEAglobal,
IDEAglobal believes these statements are reasonable, it can give no assurances that such expectations will prove to be
correct. Investors are cautioned that any forward-looking statements made by the (profiled) companies, or contained in
this profile/research report, contain no guarantee of future performance, and that the actual results may differ materially
from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Differences in results can be caused by various factors
including, but not limited to, the (profiled) companies' ability to be able to successfully complete planned funding
agreements, to successfully market its products in competitive industries or to effectively implement its business plan
and/or strategies.

FreeRealTime.com Disclaimer:
This is a paid advertisement from IDEAadvisor.
The material contained in this report is being furnished solely for informational
purposes.  FreeRealTime.com is not responsible for the content, services, or
products referenced in this advertisement.  This is not a solicitation for the
purchase or sale of securities. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own
research and due diligence, and/or obtain professional advice, prior to making
any investment decision.

The information contained herein is based on sources, which IDEAadvisor believes
to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate, and does not purport to be
a complete statement or summary of the available data. Any opinions expressed
are subject to change without notice.
The statements and opinions contained herein are not the statements and opinions
of FreeRealTime.com, and FreeRealTime.com disclaims any liability for or arising
from such statements and opinions.

This FRT Offer has been sent to you courtesy of FreeRealTime.com. To be removed
from the email distribution list for FRT Offers, simply click the link below.

http://unsub.freerealtime.com/u.html?m=409&l=offers&e=don.baughman@enron.com


Kate, I think these two deals of Sean were entered twice for Sun and Holidays
0100 to 2400.

Could you check on.

ka


Ava, LA was Socal mtg.
San Fran was Interconnect mtg
Omaha was mtg on Bushton and
SLA mtg,. Thanks Lynn
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Garcia, Ava <Ava.Garcia@ENRON.com>
To: Blair, Lynn <Lynn.Blair@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Oct 29 13:41:35 2001
Subject: San Francisco/Los Angeles/ Omaha

Lynn, I need to know what your trips where in reference to.

Thanks,
Ava


Louise -

OEC will come along with EECC & NEPCO.  Brian Stanley and Keith Dodson will run that group.

Speak with you soon.  Hope you are feeling well.

Regards - Dan

Louise Kitchen@ECT
03/14/2001 12:18 PM
To:	Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	OEC

What happens to the OEC group - does that currently report to you and will it going forward or does that move too?


Mike-

Attached please find a first draft for your Executive Letter for the
newsletter. I'm sorry that it is so sketchy. EGM is doing so much and I'm not
sure what you want to focus on right now!  I am afraid if I keep going, I
will be way over the word count for our space allotment. Right now, there are
404 words. Please fill in where it is pertinent and monitor word count to 550.

Again, I'm sorry to impose on you with this.

Kathie Grabstald
ENA Public Relations
713-853-9610


For emails to Health Center here is the correction to earlier message.

Health (space not underscore)Center.enron.com

will bring up choices in address book - path:   Health Center\Corp\Enron -
can then be chosen.

thanks
Sandy


Contents:

1) Note from Don Evans   www.bushcheneytransition.com
2) Comments from US Supreme Court Justice Scalia
3) Comments from Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles T. Wells

______________________________________________

Greetings Friends,

The election results in Florida have been certified in accordance with
Florida state law and the rulings of the Florida Supreme Court, and Governor
Bush and Secretary Cheney have won that state's 25 electoral votes.  It is
now time to get on with the business of organizing a new administration.

In order to begin that task, we have filed articles of incorporation for the
Bush/Cheney Presidential Transition Foundation, a non-profit corporation.  As
past transition foundations have done, we are applying for 501(c)(4) status
from the Internal Revenue Service.  Now we are asking for your help as our
team moves forward with plans for an orderly transition process in the short
period between now and inauguration day, January 20, 2001.

While the Presidential Transition Act of 1963, as amended in 1988,
specifically authorizes public funds for transitions, it also makes
provisions for raising contributions from private sources to help defray
transition-related expenses.  This has been done previously, most recently in
1992.  We are now soliciting contributions from our most active supporters.
Would you please visit our new transition website at
www.bushcheneytransition.com and make a contribution on our secure server.

We have made the decision to accept contributions only from individuals.  No
corporate or political action committee contributions will be accepted.
Contributions may not exceed $5,000 per person or $10,000 per couple, and all
contributors, in compliance with Governor Bush's position of full-disclosure
of financial contributions, will be posted on the transition website on a
real-time basis.  These contributions will not count against an individual's
annual political contribution federal giving limit of $25,000.

The American voters have spoken, and we are moving forward to establish a
government that will unify our country and make the common principles we
share as Americans our first priority.

If you have questions, please contact the Transition Foundation's finance
office at 512-344-3722.  All other transition inquiries should be directed to
our office in McLean, VA at (703) 918-2900. Your support of the Bush/Cheney
Presidential Transition Foundation is deeply appreciated.

Sincerely,

Donald L. Evans
Board of Directors
www.bushcheneytransition.com
Bush/Cheney Presidential Transition Foundation, Inc.
Paid for by Bush/Cheney Presidential Transition Foundation, Inc.

______________________________________________

2)

Comments from US Supreme Court Justice Scalia

"One of the principal issues in the appeal we have accepted is precisely
whether the votes that have been ordered to be counted are, under a
reasonable interpretation of Florida law, 'legally cast vote[s].'  The
counting of votes that are of questionable legality does in my view threaten
irreparable harm to petitioner, and to the country, by casting a cloud upon
what he claims to be the legitimacy of his election.  Count first, and rule
upon legality afterwards, is not a recipe for producing election results that
have the public acceptance democratic stability requires."

"Another issue in this case, moreover, is the propriety, indeed the
constitutionality, of letting the standard for determination of voters'
intent- dimpled chad, hanging chads, etc.- vary from county to county, as the
Florida Supreme court opinion, as interpreted by the Circuit Court, permits.
If petitioner [Bush] is correct that counting in this fashion is unlawful,
permitting the count to proceed on that erroneous basis will prevent an
accurate recount from being conducted on a proper basis later, since it is
generally agreed that each manual recount produces a degradation of the
ballots, which renders a subsequent recount inaccurate."

Click here to review the Order of the US Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore,
Saturday, 12-9-2000
http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a27877a56615396a2

______________________________________________

3)

Comments from Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles T. Wells

DISSENT OF CHIEF JUSTICE CHARLES J. WELLS
"I...believe that the majority's decision cannot withstand scrutiny which
will certainly immediately follow under the United States Constitution."
Excerpt:
"I want to make it clear at the outset of my separate opinion that I do not
question the good faith or honorable intentions of my colleagues in the
majority. However, I could not more strongly disagree with their decision to
reverse the trial court and prolong this judicial process. I also believe
that the majority's decision cannot withstand the scrutiny which will
certainly immediately follow under the United States Constitution."

"My succinct conclusion is that the majority's decision...has no foundation
in the law of Florida as it existed on November 7, 2000, or at anytime until
the issuance of this opinion. The majority returns the case to the circuit
court for this partial recount of  under-votes on the basis of unknown or, at
best, ambiguous standards with authority to obtain help from others, the
credentials, qualifications, and objectivity of whom are totally unknown.
That is but a first glance at the imponderable problems that the majority
creates."

"This case has reached the point where finality must take precedence over
continued judicial process. I agree with a quote from John Allen Paulos, a
professor of mathematics at Temple University, when he wrote that, "[t]he
margin of error in this election is far greater than the margin of victory,
no matter who wins." Further judicial process will not change this
self-evident fact and will only result in confusion and disorder. Justice
Terrell and this Court wisely counseled against such a course of action
sixty-four years ago. I would heed that sound advice and affirm Judge Sauls."

Click here to review the Florida Supreme Court Opinion in Gore v. Harris,
Friday, December 8, 2000
http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a27877a56615396a0

______________________________________________

If you wish to unsubscribe from the eChampion mailing list, follow this link:

http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a27877a56615396a1

To become an eChampion follow this link:

http://mail.echampions2000.com/GoNow/a14064a27877a56615396a3

Paid for by Bush-Cheney Presidential Transition Foundation, Inc.


Attached is a revised version of the Posting Agreement that S&C provided to
us.  I have tried to incorporate some additional provisions and inserted a
few "place-savers" to mark some areas where we need to discuss the agreement
further; for instance, under what circumstances has a party "defaulted" --
and should at least be liable for the other party's out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in establishing the interfaces as well as give the other party the
right to terminate the agreement -- and under what circumstances should
either party be able to walk away (such as, it just doesn't work)?

Many of these provisions will be "fleshed out" more when the technical
considerations are added, and when we sit down with the counterparty to
negotiate this Agreement.  Hopefully the attached gives you something to meet
with S&C on Wednesday.  Again, I can participate by phone if any of you think
it would be helpful.  The best way to reach me is to leave me a voicemail.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


See the attached spreadsheet.  Let me know if you have any questions.


Glen, thanks for the quick response.  The process the parties agreed upon
yesterday is acceptable to TW.

Sorry to hear there was an emergency at home; I hope all is well by now.

"Sullivan, Glen J." <GSullivan@sempra.com> on 06/08/2000 02:47:10 PM
To: "'Susan.Scott@enron.com'" <Susan.Scott@enron.com>, "Sullivan, Glen J."
<GSullivan@sempra.com>, "Cherry, Brian - TPBKC" <BCherry@sempra.com>
cc: Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com, "Cherry, Brian - TPBKC" <BCherry@sempra.com>,
"Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL" <LLorenz@socalgas.com>

Subject: RE: Exhibit

At the ALJ's direction, this subject was discussed among the parties who
were present in the hearing room yesterday at the lunch break and again
after the conclusion of hearings for the day.  The parties present reached
agreement on a process for this exhibit.

I had to leave for home immediately after the discussions in the hearing
room at the end of yesterday due to a family emergency.

I am informed the results of these discussions were put on the record today.
I understand that SoCalGas will provide to all parties by June 16 a draft of
the exhibit.  Parties can then comment to SoCalGas and we will attempt to
get a consensus by June 21.  SoCalGas will file by June 21 either a version
that has concensus, or failing concensus, its own version of what it thinks
the exhibit should show.  Parties who do not agree with what SoCalGas files
on June 21 can file on June 23 either their own version or comments on
SoCalGas' version.

I cannot absolutely guarantee the accuracy of the above details since I was
not present today and there is no transcript yet for today.

If this arrangement is not acceptable to Transwestern, you should object to
the ALJ immediately.  Hearings are scheduled to conclude after the lunch
break today.

Also, I am informed that SCGC has distributed in the hearing room and will
attempt to introduce today a written exhibit that includes an extensive
discussion of its views on the subject of "mismatches" of delivery and
take-away capacity at the California border.

-- Glen Sullivan
Attorney for SoCalGas and SDG&E
(619) 699-5162

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan.Scott@enron.com [mailto:Susan.Scott@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 9:39 AM
To: gsullivan@sempra.com
Cc: Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com
Subject: Exhibit

Glen, at page 1020 of the transcript of yesterday's proceedings, the judge
asked you and Norm Pedersen to work with various other parties to develop
an exhibit reflecting capacity at the California border.  The judge
mentioned she wanted to discuss the exhibit this morning, so I am surprised
that you did not attempt to contact me to get Transwestern's input or at
least to let us review the exhibit.  I would like to review the exhibit as
soon as possible.  I am out of town but you can either e-mail it to me or
fax it to 941-466-2198 (before 3 pm PDT).  Also, I should be reachable on
my mobile phone (713-494-5002) or by voice mail at my office
(713-853-0596).


Just put 17 pages on the fax machine.


Carolyn,

We are good to go  on the ENA consent.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/18/2001 10:37:00 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: ENA Consent

Kay:

The enclosed ENA Consent looks fine to me, but you may wish to run this by
Sheila Tweed, as she had a specific request on the NY court jurisdiction
language.  We initially advised Isabel Parker that Enron would accept NY
federal court jurisdiction but not jurisdiction of NY state courts.  She did
not take our comment, and Enron subsequently said it would accept
jurisdiction of commercial courts in Manhattan, but not state courts
generally (language suggested by Sheila Tweed through Carlos Sole).   Isabel
has drafted the revised version to delete reference to NY state courts
altogether and to limit the federal courts reference to those located in the
borough of Manhattan.  Please review and advise.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: VAN DUSEN, Nicholas [mailto:nicholas.vandusen@freshfields.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:24 AM
To: 'gregorylang@paulhastings.com'; 'ccampbell@kslaw.com'
Cc: PARKER, Isabel; O'BRIEN, Lisa
Subject: ENA Consent

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

Attached please find a clean and blacklined version with the most recent
changes to this document.  We now believe that the document should be in
final form but please let us know if you have further comments.

Regards,
Nick Van Dusen

Tel: 212-284-4984
FAX: 212-277-4001
nicholas.vandusen@freshfields.com

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - COMPARE001.DOC
 - NY003699617.DOC


Thanks, Mark. Of course in doing the Reuters telephone interview yesterday
morning at Eva's request, for more than an hour, I made all of the critical/
explanatory points, and more, you mention below. The temptation of the quote
from the Commission official was obviously irresistible for one of the
journalists (Pomeroy) however. On the positive side, however, mention of
traders' objections to level and incidence of the proposed tariff, its
discriminatory effect, and absence of agreement about implementation in
Germany are attributable to my briefing of the other journalist, Orgill.

The quoted official is giving the Dominique Ristori (a Commission Energy
Policy Director of French nationality) party line, but our "victory" is
attributable to decisions taken in the Cabinet of Loyola de Palacio, the
Energy Commissioner, with whom I intervened on behalf of EFET two weeks ago,
and who had already been confronted in September by British government
objections. As such, it no longer matters objectively what M. Ristori and his
spokespersons think about the "demise of the 2 euros". As you and I discussed
yesterday, we must now move on rapidly to offer an alternative traders/
system users' solution for establishment of non discriminatory cross border
transmission tariffs. An EFET paper for this purpose is already in
preparation, and I spoke to the Cabinet of Mario Monti (Competition
Commissioner) about the principles involved on Wednesday evening this week.

Mark Schroeder
10/27/2000 11:52 AM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: EU plans for single power market suffer setback.- Enron Mention-
Reuters

This article/wire report from Reuters came in yesterday just as I left for a
lecture, so I am only now forwarding it to you.  Joe tells me that Investor
Relations has received some inquiries about "what is going on in Europe"
yesterday, due to the bad headline Reuters chose below (aided by a
self-serving European Commission official), and Dynegy's Q3 earnings showing
red ink for Europe.  Ignoring the headline, and the quote from the European
Commission civil servant (which I will elaborate upon below), this is a BIG
WIN. It is progress for liberalisation, and I intend to tell The Economist
just that when I do an interview with a reporter later today.  This story is
about the DEMISE of the ill-conceived 2Euros/MWh export charge.  It stands
truth and logic on its head to say, as the unnamed European official does,
that the demise of the 2 euros charge was anything like "harmonisation" or
that its demise sets back European liberalisattion.  It is now much more
likely that we will get a charging regime that will maintain or increase
trade, and certainly will not set back trade as the 2 euros would have.  Just
to further de-construct the article, it was never a "single charge" (recall
that new entrants disproportionately bore the burden, with many pre-existing
contracts (of incumbents, since we did not exist in this market 3+ years ago)
being exempt, nor would it contribute to a single market, but rather would
have raised barriers to cross-border trade.  Moreover, the cost basis for the
charge was never made transparent, either.  Finally, the rebate scheme likely
would have subsidised the incumbents' competition against new entrants.
There is a good quote from Peter Styles (and Peter deserves a great deal of
recognition for leading the efforts to defeat this).  If you read the
article, not the headline and European Commission official quote, you can see
the other arguments against it, including the claim by German industrial
consumers that it would have raised their prices by 10%.  Any message from PR
or Investor Relations must be that this is a victory in the march towards a
fully liberalised market, and a win for consumers.  The reason a European
ommission official would say what they did is that they have been complicit
in the German/Franco conspiracy to impose the 2 euros charge, and probably
felt compelled to save face by saying this is a setback; otherwise, one would
ask why were they working on/supporting something so deleterious to the
development of the market?!

Apologies for being a bit lengthy, but I wrote this hopefully with sufficient
detail that if you want to forward this to either PR or Investor Relations,
they will be armed with enough info that they can respond to further
inquiries.  By the way, we had an inkling of this via telephone coversation I
had with UK DTI three days ago (communicated immediately to traders, just did
not have time to summarise in an e-mail to you).  I will be summarising my
conversation with UK DTI momentarily, even though it is 3 days old, because I
will be adding some of her commentary on the wider political lay of the land,
which I think you will want to read for the "big picture" of European
machinations.  let me know if you need more.  thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 27/10/2000
10:36 ---------------------------

Iona Maclean
26/10/2000 17:35
To: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Eva
Hoeffelman/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT,
Andreas Radmacher/FRA/ECT@ECT, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT,
christina_mueller@de.cohnwolfe.com, Viviana Florio/FRA/ECT@ECT, Christopher
McKey/FRA/ECT@ECT, Bart Lyon/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Kreuzberg/FRA/ECT@ECT, Sven
Becker/FRA/ECT@ECT, Gregor Baumerich/LON/ECT@ECT, John Oliver/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EU plans for single power market suffer setback.- Enron Mention-
Reuters

---------------------- Forwarded by Iona Maclean/LON/ECT on 26/10/2000 17:35
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  djcustomclips@djinteractive.com                           26/10/2000
18:22

Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 216668@mailman.enron.com
cc:

Subject: Enron Reuters folder: UK: EU plans for single power market suffer
setback.

UK:
EU plans for single power market suffer setback.
By Margaret Orgill

10/26/2000
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2000.

LONDON, Oct 26 (Reuters) - European Union hopes for a single electricity
market have suffered a setback after power companies and consumers failed to
agree a system for harmonising cross-border transmission tariffs, said
officials on Thursday.

Plans to introduce a single tariff for access to the west European grid by
November 1 have been postponed because of misgivings, particularly from some
power producers, said a European Union source.
"It seems that we have more problems than expected and the European Commission
could have to go for legislation," said the official, who declined to be
named.

The tariff is a voluntary proposal by western European grid operators to
harmonise cross border charges and create a single regional power market.

The official declined to give more details of the producers' doubts but
traders are opposed to the fee which they say is too high and will stifle the
emerging European power trading market.

The proposal has also run into legal problems in Germany where its
introduction would require changes to an industry agreement on access to the
regional electricity grid.

German consumer bodies are unlikely to accept the new tariff which will add
around 10 percent to wholesale power prices.

"The VIK, which represents industrial consumers, has already written to the
Commission saying they will not accept this fee," said Einar Vestra, managing
director of the trading division at Mannheim-based utility MVV.

TARIFF TO BE DISCUSSED BY EU, INDUSTRY

The tariff will be discussed by the so-called Florence group, which includes
EU officials, government and industry representatives, which is due to meet
again on November 9-10.

If the voluntary approach does not work, Brussels may decide to include
provisions on cross-border transmission in a forthcoming directive to speed up
the opening of Europe's electricity markets.

Grid operators have proposed a flat charge of two euros per megawatt hour for
exports regardless of how many borders the power crosses, instead of charging
a fee at each frontier.

The funds from the tariff will be put in a central pot and divided among grid
owners to reimburse network transit costs, estimated at around 200 million
euros a year.

Traders argue the fee is too expensive and object to the fact the grid
companies want to charge it only on new contracts and exempt existing
long-term contracts.

"An export-related transmission fee was misconceived in the first place," said
Peter Styles, vice president of European government affairs at U.S. utility
Enron.

"The priority in the Florence process should be greater harmonisation between
access regimes in member states...with a view of achieving transmission
tariffs which include cross border access."

(Additional reporting by Robin Pomeroy).

Folder Name: Enron Reuters folder
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 82

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


We want to have an internal conference call at 330 (instato discuss the
enovate intercompany loans, and address any issues raised by the Enron
commercial/financial team.  I don't know the substance of the comments.

Kay

"Heather Brown" <hbrown@bracepatt.com> on 10/31/2000 12:21:58 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: enovate intercompany loan

Early morning is full, but I'm free at 10:00 and several hours thereafter.
Would this be in addition to or in lieu of the 3:30 call?  Also, do you have
any heads-up re:  what the comments will be?

Thanks.  Heather

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 10/31/00 09:09AM >>>
What does your schedule look like Wednesday am?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/31/2000 09:09
AM ---------------------------

From: Gregg Penman on 10/30/2000 02:24 PM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:  enovate intercompany loan

What about Wednesday morning to discuss Bracewell's draft of the
intercompany loan agreement?  Kay could you check Heather's availability?
Anyone else that should be included?

Thanks,

Gregg


How can I get info on deals we've done to you?  Jeff


OK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gomez, Julie A.
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 8:57 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	floor space...

Your favorite subject!!!

Tammie just informed my assistant that the space where the plotter is slotted to be cannot be turned into a people spot because there is a big pole in the way.  So, I am back to needing one more space.

Let me know what can be done.

Thanks,

Julie  :-)


I believe the payment schedule on the spread sheet previously given to AK is
correct.  If there is a conflict, change order 4 takes precedence as to the
timing of the payments.  At least 10% has been paid on these turbines, so I
don't understand the 5% question.

Rebecca Walker is preparing an updated payment schedule for all the break out
contracts.

Kay

Dale Rasmussen@ECT
12/07/2000 01:51 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Payment schedule for Las Vegas Turbines

Pete Thompson called with a question about what payments have been made on
the Las Vegas turbines.  He made specific reference to Change Order #4 and
the effect it may have on the payment schedule for Las Vegas.

Do you know whether a 5% payment was made on these 4 turbines, or will the
full payment amount be due on May 15, Julsy 30 and August 30?


Let's start over:

ISSUE 1-Mike Swerzbin
deal 524248 and deal 524266
This two deals checkout with Amerex fine.  Amerex has one deal at 50 mw and
we have two identical deals at 25 mw.

deal 524247
This deal checks out with Amerex fine.

The deal that I am missing is Enron buys from EES 25 mw of off-peak Mid-C for
Q3'01 at $285.95.

ISSUE 2- Mike Swerzbin
deal 524267
 Amerex has 50 mw and we have 25 mw.

ISSUE 3- Dianna Scholtes
deal 523984
Amerex has price as $345 and we have price as $335.

This has been a terrible ordeal and I will be so glad when everthing is
resolved!!!

Thanks
Evelyn

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/15/2001 06:10 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2/15 Amerex Checkout

I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys from EES 25 mw of off-peak Mid-C for Q3'01 at $285.95. - 524248 -
part of a spread sleeve done with EES and El Paso - only one broker fee
agreed upon - fee included on deal 524247 NOT 524248

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/15/2001 02:38 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2/15 Amerex Checkout

Jeff Richter
deal 523881
Per Amerex the term should be 2/17 only not 2/17-2/18

deal 523882
Per Amerex the term should be 2/17 only not 2/17-2/18

Matt Motley
deal 524143
Per Amerex the price should be $263 not $163

Mike Swerzbin
deal 524171
Per Amerex the price should be $300 not $310

deal 524172
Per Amerex the price should be $300 not $310

deal 524267
Per Amerex the total mw should be 50 not 25

deal 524310
Per Amerex the term should be March not April

I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys from EES 25 mw of off-peak Mid-C for Q3'01 at $285.95.


I'm still at home.  I'll be in tomorrow.  I have a fax machine at home,
though, if you prefer.  Otherwise, we can see who we can scare up at the
office, or you can have Laura sign and I'll initial later.  Which do you
prefer?

Kay

From: Gregg Penman on 10/26/2000 11:09 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: enovate Risk Policy

Are you in the office to initial signature pages today?  If not, is there
someone else that will?
I know that Jeff is in Portland.

Gregg

	Kay Mann
	10/26/2000 11:07 AM

		 To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: enovate Risk Policy

If Jeff is happy, I'm happy.

Kay

From: Gregg Penman on 10/26/2000 07:51 AM
To: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: enovate Risk Policy

Hello - I spoke with Jeff Hodge yesterday regarding the additional language
from Peoples regarding Audit Rights.  His initial reaction was that their
request was probably reasonable and in line with the spirit of a jointly
owned L.L.C.  However, he did suggest a couple slight revisions to protect
Enron's interests.
1) Highlighting that information will only be provided that is related to
enovate and 2) that each designated representative should sign an appropriate
confidentiality agreement.  This language has been included in the attached
draft.  My goal, however optimistic, is to execute the risk policy by the end
of today.  Activity is picking up dramatically and the fine line is getting
further blurred each passing day.  Therefore, I need to know ASAP if there
are any problems with the draft as written.  Otherwise, I will be sending it
to Peoples as our final revision by mid morning.  Thanks for your prompt
attention to this.

Thanks,

Gregg

----- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 10/26/2000 07:40 AM -----

	Gregg Penman
	10/23/2000 12:12 PM

		 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: enovate Risk Policy

Kay - Can you please review this additional language to the risk management
policy ( or circulate to Jeff Hodge)?  In light of the CA regarding curves, I
am slightly concerned with a blanket statement essentially giving Peoples
unlimited access to information. I know that we address audit rights in the
LLC agreement so this may not matter anyway if this is a right they already
have.  Let me know what you think.

Thanks,

Gregg
----- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 10/23/2000 12:07 PM -----

	m.nordstrom@pecorp.com
	10/20/2000 11:32 AM

		 To: p.burgener@pecorp.com, Vladimir.Gorny@enron.com, Gregg.Penman@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: enovate Risk Policy

Attached please find the latest enovate risk policy.  Our attorneys and
internal audit area have made one language revision concerning Section XIII
Audit Rights.

Mary <<MEH-risk Oct 20>>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - MEH-risk Oct 20.doc


Please open the attached file to read the complete text of the following
items:

11:37AM EDT 22-SEP-00 WIT SOUNDVIEW (MARK SPECKER) INTC CPQ DELL
PC UPDATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2000

08:30AM EDT 22-SEP-00 C.E. UNTERBERG, TOWBIN (JAMES POYNER) CPQ
CPQ: INTEL`S EUROPEAN SHORTFALL CONTRARY TO COMPAQ VIEW

08:03AM EDT 22-SEP-00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY (RICHARD GARDNER) AAPL
IMPLICATIONS OF INTEL 3Q WARNING FOR PC STOCKS

09:41AM EDT 22-SEP-00 GOLDMAN SACHS (JOE MOORE) INTC INTC.GWI INTC.N
INTC PREANNOUNCEMENT: THOUGHTS REGARDING IMPACT ON OTHER STOCKS

00:16AM EDT 22-SEP-00 MORGAN STANLEY\DW (MUNSON, GILLIAN) CPQ
TECHNOLOGY: SOME ANSWERS TO THE CURRENCY JITTERS FOR PCS

 <<09.22.00 Analyst Reports.doc>>

The analyst reports provided are reports prepared by independent analysts
who monitor and track Compaq's performance.  These reports are not prepared
by or at the direction of Compaq and as a result, Compaq is not endorsing or
verifying the information contained in these reports or endorsing any of
these analysts.   These reports are being provided solely for business
reasons and as a result, do not distribute these reports to other
individuals outside of Compaq.  If other individuals are interested in
receiving the reports provided herein, please contact Elizabeth Davis in
Compaq's Investor Relations Department at elizabeth.davis@compaq.com.

Elizabeth Davis
Compaq - Investor Relations
Research Analyst
281-518-4289

 - 09.22.00 Analyst Reports.doc


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:16 PM -----

	Karen Denne
	10/16/2000 02:22 PM

		 To: Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: ITC release

fyi, the attached release which mentions PGE as one of six utilities forming
an independent transmission company is scheduled to be released today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000
02:23 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Fryburg/ENRON@Gateway on 10/16/2000 02:17 PM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ITC release

As Kregg mentioned on the communication conf call today, here's the final
draft of the release on the Independent Transmission Company that will go out
this hour. It will not have a company letterhead.

Regards,

- Mark


I am attaching the presentation from the May 7th EGM all-employee meeting.
Due to time constraints, the meeting covered only four of the EGM markets:
coal, LNG, weather and crude/products.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Lisa

----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Cathy Phillips@ECT
	05/10/2001 01:25 PM

		 To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: May 7 Meeting

Hi Lisa -

Here is the presentation.

Cathy

	Lisa Yoho@ENRON
	05/10/2001 01:18 PM

		 To: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: May 7 Meeting

Cathy -

Do you have an electronic copy of the presentations that were made on May
7?   If so, would you mind forwarding it to me?

Thanks.
Lisa


Good morning, you look very nice today.  How are you doing?  How was the apt?  Any problems at home because of Shelly?

Anyway have a great day.  I really love seeing you each day.  Thanks for the ride yesterday.  I really appreciate it.

Talk to you soon.


Donnie,

Thank you for meeting with us last week.  The information you provided was
very useful.  We have the following additional questions regarding the
correlation of power curves and the related controls surrounding changes to
curve correlation factors:

   How are correlation factors (i.e., for "basis" or "secondary" curves)
   calculated?  Do the correlations typically change?  How often and how
   are they reviewed for accuracy?
   Do the factors change for delivery month (i.e., are they different in
   the short-term versus longer terms)?
   What approvals exist for changes to correlation factors by traders, if
   applicable?
   Do system controls exist to limit or prohibit changes to correlation
   factors?
   What other controls are in place to monitor or prohibit changes in
   correlation factors?
   What are the applicable correlations between the curves you provided?
   (If the correlations are difficult to provide, please let me know)

I am assuming that you would be the appropriate contact for these questions
since Stacey had referred us to you previously for overall curve
correlations.  However, if you are not the correct contact, please feel
free to call me at x56953 or e-mail me with the appropriate contact name.

Thank you for your assistance,

Jennifer
*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


See my 10/20 email to you.


Tana,

I have prepared the draft and given it to David for review.

Genia
---------------------- Forwarded by Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001
08:20 AM ---------------------------
From: Marcus Nettelton@ENRON on 03/23/2001 08:03 AM
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: The New Power Company

All

Is anyone working on a physical master with this counterparty? If so please
could you advise Tana of progress.

Many thanks.

Marcus

----- Forwarded by Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001 07:59 AM -----

	Tana Jones@ECT
	03/22/2001 06:25 PM

		 To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Walter Guidroz/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: The New Power Company

Do you know the progress of getting a physical power master in place with
this counterparty?  Can you keep me apprised.  They are obviously a
quasi-affiliate and we have internal people contacting me checking on their
progress.  Thanks!


Attached please find a Tax Review of California Assembly Bill No. 128 ("AB
128X").  The Tax Review sets out the practical implication (increased cost to
purchasers) and constitutional deficiencies of AB 128X.

The third paragraph of the Tax Review details the mathematical computation of
the tax and the resulting purchaser price increase.  The computation sales
price, $300/MWh, reflects the SP15 (Southern California) weighted average
index price ($302.88), rounded to the nearest hundred, as reported in
Megawatt Daily's May 8th MarketReport.  However, it may be more effective to
present the mathematical computation with a price closer to the proposed base
price of $60/MWh.  We are available to assist in presenting the computation
utilizing whichever numbers you deem appropriate.

The California Senate has passed SB 1X, Windfall Profits Tax on Electric
Generators.  We will forward a similar memorandum addressing SB 1X.

We are available to address questions and/or comments.  Thanks.

Ed Coats - 713.853.6369
Steve Douglas - 713.853.0938
Gavin Russo - 713.853.6296
Matt Gockerman - 713.853.3979


Karen - please send a copy.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Koenig, Mark" <Mark.Koenig@ENRON.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 5:14 PM
To:	steven.kean@enron.com
Subject:

Steve- I spoke with Gay this afternon.  She gave Karen a very rough
earnings release this morning.  It needs a ton of work.  Butts says
numbers not available until at least Wed.  We should be able to sit down
amd discuss the conference call "items" with you late tomorrow.  We can
talk this evening.  Thanks.  MEK
Mark Koenig