I understand that there may be a need to give no quarter on this, but given
the circumstances--i.e., we talk every day and time and resources are
extremely tight--is it reasonable to temporarily suspend filling this thing
out for the next 60-90 days?  Lemme know.

My sister just called and said that the earthquake in Seattle was 7.0.
That's big.

Best,
Jeff

	Lysa Akin@ECT
	02/28/2001 09:57 AM

		 To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New!

Please review the attached form, and update any information necessary.  This
will replace the Internal resource form we were using previously.  Please
respond by COB Friday 3/2/01 with any changes.

Thank you.

Lysa

---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:02 AM
---------------------------

Ginger Dernehl@ENRON
02/22/2001 08:02 AM
To: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean
Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Chauncey Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Geriann Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Gisele S Braz/SA/Enron@Enron, Laurie
Knight/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Belzak/TOR/ECT@ECT, Rubena
Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle
Garcia/ENRON@enronXgate, Carmen Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: New IRTF Format:  ENA Government Affairs Report - Feb 01

Attached to this e:mail, you will find the ENA Government Affairs report for
the month of January.  This will be the new monthly format that will take
place of the IRTF.  As you will see from the style of this format, it should
help in expediting the process of this report.

If you have any questions,

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001
07:25 AM ---------------------------
From: James D Steffes on 02/11/2001 02:55 PM
To: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janine
Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ENA Goverment Affairs Report - Feb 01

Attached please find the ENA Government Affairs report for Feb '01.  I tried
to incorporate the material from the IRTF reports.

I have asked Eric Benson to help me put these together going forward so
hopefully they will be out the first week of the month.

My other request is to see if people can modify their IRTF to include some
new data - WHAT ACTIONS WILL OCCUR IN NEXT 30 DAYS THAT NEED ATTENTION OF
MANAGEMENT.  This report is too  backward looking in its current form.  I
want to try and make this a listing of what is going to happen over the next
30 days to begin to get ENA management thinking about the issues.

Thanks,

Jim


Randy Pais at Enron is handling. You are right that all of this is confidential. I don't think we want anyone to know that we are asking for a permit and the selling the site. By the way, we have no buyer.Randy has your name if he needs anyone in Memphis. Nice to hear from you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kesser, Peter H." <pkesser@bdbc.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kesser+2C+20Peter+20H+2E+22+20+3Cpkesser+40bdbc+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:32 AM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	FW: Enron Public Policy

Richard:

This  is the e-mail message that I mentioned to you yesterday.  Thanks for your  help.  Take care.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Kesser, Peter H.
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 3:37 PM
To: Helton,  Thomas; Ford, Jennifer; Helton, Joshua; Wiseman, Lang
Subject: RE:  Enron Public Policy
T.O.,  Jennifer, Josh, and Lang:

Richard Sanders of Enron called me  yesterday morning.  He said that Enron is  selling the Arlington "plant" even before construction begins.  In other  words, Enron is selling the land, the permit applications, some turbines and  other equipment, and the technology for building the plant.  Richard said  that he would try to confirm this information by speaking to the in-house Enron  attorney who is handling this project.  This is probably confidential  information, so I suggest that you not disclose it outside the firm.  I  will attempt to obtain the name of the buyer so as to determine whether we may  be in a position to provide services to that entity.   Thanks.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Ford, Jennifer
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 3:12 PM
To: Helton,  Joshua; Kesser, Peter H.
Subject: RE: Enron Public  Policy
Peter,  as a follow up to Josh's email, it would be good for you to know I will be  having lunch this Wednesday with David Harbin.  David literally wrote the  current "suspension" of new power development sources for the governor (also  known as the "moratorium").  More importantly, he will be writing the  governor's response at the completion of findings to presented by the  Interagency Energy Policy Work Group as well as directly advising  Sundquist during the findings process.  David is an attorney "on loan"  to TDEC from the EPA.  David's close to our Firm and has offered to  listen to our suggestions.   BDBC has the services of two  partners, Bob Steele and Jim Vines, versed in setting up both  base--load or peeking plants.  We can't afford to miss this opportunity as  a Firm or fail to alert our client to our "unique expertise."  How's that  for a sales job!  Thanks for your support.  Jenny
-----Original Message-----
From: Helton, Joshua
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Kesser,  Peter H.
Cc: Ford, Jennifer
Subject: Enron Public  Policy
Peter, I understand  you spoke with my dad earlier today about the possibilities of providing some  public policy representation for Enron.  Jenny Ford and I have already  begun attending meetings of the Interagency Energy Policy Work Group and  receive updates on their itinerary.  As my dad told you, this group will  have great influence over the future of the power plant moratorium in the  state.  I have several documents that explain the work group, it's  mission, and it's members that I will forward if you like.  Please feel  free to contact me with any questions or comments.  We are looking  forward to the opportunity to work with Enron.

Josh
****************************************************************************
NOTICE:  This electronic mail transmission may constitute an
attorney-client communication that is privileged at law.  It is not
intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons.
If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please
delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by
reply e-mail, so that our address record can be corrected.
****************************************************************************


Kay, can you set up a dinner with Randall.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
08:08 PM ---------------------------

Randall Curry@ENRON
09/25/2000 06:40 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Calpine

Dave,

Thanks for following through with the contact.  As we discussed, the
discussions we had with Calpine were at a local level and very preliminary,
with Bridgeline indicating to Calpine that we are always open to looking at
ways that will enhance shareholder value.  I agree with you that at this time
it has a low probability of evolving into anything.

On a separate note, I would like to take you up on your offer of your time
and resources.  I know that Bridgeline is a very small component of the
things that are on your radar screen, but if it is not too much of an
imposition, I would like to have a one on one discussion with you concerning
a few of the issues we discussed at the management committee mtg.

I want to make sure that I am crystal clear on the perspectives and desires
of both parents.  Coming from Texaco, I feel like I have a good feel for
Texaco's short and long term expectations for the partnership, however I
would like to dig a little deeper with you on a few of the issues we
discussed at the management committee mtg, and a couple of your points in
your follow up email to me.

The afternoon or evening would work best for me, and I would be happy to pick
up the tab for dinner one night if that fits with your schedule.  The balance
of this week is kind of tight, however, the week of September 2nd and 9th are
fairly open with the exception of Tuesday night the 3rd.

Thanks for your help, look forward to talking to you soon.

Randy

David W Delainey@ECT
09/22/2000 06:48 PM
To: Randall Curry/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Calpine

Randy, Scott Healy contacted Bob Kelly at Calpine about Calpine's potential
interest in Bridgeline and he found that Kelly and Cartwright had no real
knowledge of the potential deal.  Likely this originates at the local level
and is probably a long put.  Kelly was going to get back to Scott with more
detail over the next week.

Regards
Delainey


Not controlling the agenda.  Hopefully either Mark or Janette can arrange some time on Thursday and maybe gas on Friday?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:21 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs

can we make any ercot discussion tomorrow as I am out friday??

The retail stuff needs to be close behind the qse registration. we are putting a timeline together for it.

Thanks,

Doug

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:41 AM
To:	Gilbert-smith, Doug; Day, Smith L.; Sager, Elizabeth; Portz, David
Cc:	Will, Lloyd; Presto, Kevin M.; Bailey, Debra; Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs

UBS Legal and UBS Credit is heading to Houston this Thursday and Friday.  I have asked that ERCOT matters get 1 hour to discuss the necessary contracts that UBS will need to sign to participate in the ERCOT market.

Basically, my understanding is the following --

1.	PUCT Registration Form for Power Marketer
2.	ERCOT ISO Information
	QSE
	LSE
	Wholesale Enabling Agreement
	Other
3.	APX Agreement?
4.	Other

Given the list of issues, this assumes that UBSW Energy will not be selling electricity at retail.  If we need this for Day 1, we would have to get an additional license from the PUCT.

Thanks,

Jim


Interesting letter....

----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 01:36 PM -----

	"Pisciotta, Aileen" <APisciotta@KelleyDrye.com>
	03/01/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: "'sue.nord@enron.com'" <sue.nord@enron.com>, "'scott_bolton@enron.net'"
<scott_bolton@enron.net>, "'sburns@enron.com'" <sburns@enron.com>
		 cc: "Wilson, Heather M." <HWilson@KelleyDrye.com>, "Aamoth, Robert J."
<RAamoth@KelleyDrye.com>
		 Subject: FW: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

Dear Sue, Scott and Steve -- The letter below from George Gilder to FCC
Chairman Powell sets important parameters for our "vision".  We anticipated
that Powell would be unimpressed, if not hostile, to "open access"
approaches, but this should put a nail in the coffin.  The watchword will be
"innovation".  I imagine that both "Telecosm" and Hamel's "Leading the
Revolution" are high on Powell's reading list!

We look forward to talking with you next week.  Aileen.

-----Original Message-----
From: Engel, Michael C.
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:22 PM
To: Telecommunications Practice Group
Subject: FW: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

This is an interesting letter to Commissioner Powell published last week.
Given the level of respect that the Commissioner has for Mr. Gilder (MKP has
repeatedly referenced Gilder's book Telecosm and speaks of him frequently),
it may be worth reading.  In any event, it gives a pretty good 30,000 foot
view of telecom policy considerations.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Jackson [mailto:pjackson@fcc.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 12:09 PM
To: powell_interns@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

** Confidential **

The Wall Street Journal
Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Friday, February 23, 2001

The Broadband Economy Needs a Hero
By George Gilder and Bret Swanson

  Dear Mr. Powell:

  Whether you know it or not, your leadership and decisions over the next
four years will have more impact on the economy than those of Federal
Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

   Surely, our stock-market swoon of 2000 and stagnating economic growth in
2001 are partly due to the Fed's inexplicable liquidity leash combined with
the highest tax burden since World War II. But the chief threats to the
21st- century economy are the politicians, bureaucrats and Silicon Valley
know-nothings responsible for America's broadband connectivity crisis.

  We owe Les Vadasz of Intel an apology for making fun of his prediction
that narrowband links would prevail into the 21st century. The Internet as
we know it is about seven years old, yet fewer than 7 million of 100 million
American homes enjoy broadband and its wealth of social, commercial and
educational opportunities.

  Contrary to popular belief, the chief obstacle to progress is not
entrenched Bell operating companies, but a regulatory regime that presumes
to "level the playing field," "equalize access," and "promote competition."
The only result of these policies has been the effective nationalization and
paralysis of broadband.

  The 1996 Telecommunications Act ruled that in exchange for the right to
enter the long-distance telephone business, the Bells must open their
residential copper lines to competitors, as well as allow these competitors
to locate equipment in Bell central offices and offer digital subscriber
line (DSL) services over Bell-owned copper. In November 1999, the FCC issued
a further decree forcing the Bells to stop dragging their feet and
cooperate.

  The FCC actions spawned a new category of start-ups known as broadband
competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), which planned to compete with
the Bells. Funded by billions of dollars in Silicon Valley venture capital
and public offerings, companies like Rhythms, Northpoint, Covad and Jato
earned praise from "libertarians" in both Washington and Palo Alto, Calif.
Northpoint even had freedom-loving former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt on its
board.

  But despite all good intentions, these were not high-tech start-ups. They
became venture capital-funded lobbying and litigation shops intent on
forcing the Bells to share their copper. With more press releases on new
lawsuits than on new subscribers, one of the companies epitomized the
strategy: "Rhythms continues successful regulatory litigation." The result
of all this lawyering? The CLECs won everything. Access to copper wherever
they sued. Multimillion- dollar awards from the Bells. And bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy?

  Late last year, Northpoint filed for Chapter 11 after Verizon withdrew an
$800 million investment. Jato closed its doors. Rhythms cut its staff by
23%. Covad is slashing 800 jobs and closing 260 central offices. Of Covad's
274,000 lines in service, 92,000 are not "recognizing revenue." And all of
this is happening in the face of massive consumer demand for broadband
services.

  The problem is that DSL is risky and hard. Some studies have reported that
50% of DSL hook-ups fail on the first try. Even amicable relationships
between CLECs and Bells are a software nightmare, with a different billing
and provisioning system for each service provider. Such difficulties render
DSL not a matter of will and politics but of technical and entrepreneurial
risks. Companies are forced to invest heavily in research and engineering
personnel, but have few opportunities for outsized rewards.

  That's because Congress and the FCC set up an awkward scheme in which
everyone got a piece of the action but no one could make any money. Often
barred from carrying signals across long-distance boundaries, the Bells hand
off traffic to other long-distance carriers. CLECs rent lines from the
Bells. And Internet service providers end up doing costly customer service
and marketing to get people signed up in the first place. In short, as many
as four parties routinely battle for low- or negative-margin chunks of
$40-monthly bills.

  By summoning new competition and then mandating the rivals cooperate in
open access, the government effectively privatized the risks and socialized
the profits. By December, the Bells had signed up 1.8 million users and the
CLECs 600,000, combining for just 2.4 million DSL subscribers among the 120
million or so copper-connected U.S. homes and businesses.

  Cable modems, with 4.9 million subscribers at year-end, have done better,
but AOL Time Warner and AT&T, America's two cable behemoths, are bogged down
by the same open-access nonsense that plagues DSL. Over the past two years,
AT&T CEO Michael Armstrong acquired $140 billion in cable assets while
watching his company's $184 billion market capitalization plummet to $81
billion.

  Just last month the Federal Trade Commission ruled that AOL Time Warner
must offer "at least one non-affiliated cable broadband ISP [Internet
Service Provider] service on Time Warner's cable system before AOL itself
begins offering service, followed by two other non-affiliated ISPs within 90
days and a requirement to negotiate in good faith with others after that."
The nation's second-largest ISP, EarthLink, will now get access to AOL's
expensive cables pretty much for free.

  This regulatory morass treats the most dynamic, technically creative, and
transformative industry in the world economy as if it were some static
commodity market for corn or pork bellies.

  Mr. Chairman, in a recent speech you made the key point that innovation is

more important than price competition. When it comes to leading-edge
services and technologies, narrow price competition is almost meaningless.
Internet innovation means qualitative change, order-of-magnitude price
reductions and constantly changing services that always constitute
monopolies when first launched.

  No Internet advantage can last more than a couple of years. In 1999 and
2000, over 150 million kilometers of optical fiber were laid world-wide,
enough to stretch to the sun. Hundreds of billions of dollars have already
been invested by metropolitan fiber-optic network builders (Metromedia
Fiber, Level 3 Communications), optical hardware companies (Avanex, ONI,
Sorrento) and optical service providers (Yipes, Cogent, Sphera). These
companies are already rendering the metropolitan DSL debate moot with
thousand-fold increases in price performance over existing technology.
Similar breakthroughs are on the way in residential wireless. But none of
these deployments, including fiber to the home, can flourish under a regime
of forced sharing of entrepreneurial assets and profits.

  In this environment, let the Bells compete in long-distance and extort any
temporary profits they can from their local copper cages. Let the cable
companies capitalize on their advantage for the few years it will last.
Allow the infinite spectrum of air and fiber to be exploited in any way its
owners wish. Then, sit back, and nostalgically recall those early days of
the Internet, when we naively thought a 5% economic growth rate was really
something. The broadband economy needs a hero. President Bush and Mr.
Greenspan need a technology savior. You are the man best equipped to play
that role.

  ---

Paul A. Jackson
Special Assistant to the Chairman
Office of Chairman Michael K. Powell
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Suite 8B201
Washington, DC  20554
Phone: 202-418-1000
Fax: 202-418-2801
E-mail: pjackson@fcc.gov
Web Site: http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/powell/

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named
recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney
work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have
received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please
immediately notify the sender at (202) 418-1000 and delete this e-mail
message from your computer, Thank you.

The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged,
confidential, and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that any
other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this
communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think
that you have received this E-mail message in error, please reply to the
sender. This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for
viruses and are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it
is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and
no responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or
damage arising in any way from its use.


Doug, we will need to have this document along with the evaluation reviewed by legal prior to presenting to the employee.

Attached is a Performance Improvement Plan for your employee(s) who rated in the bottom cluster. The steps below outline the instructions for completing this form. If you have any questions, please contact your HR Representative

- Supervisors are encouraged to consider employee input before finalizing the PIP.
- The PIP should address the specific performance areas and examples provided in the employee's evaluation.
- All PIP's should be reviewed by your Human Resources generalist before being presented to the employee.

Performance/Development Area:
This is the specific area in which the employee's demonstrated performance needs to improve, or a significant area where additional development is needed. These should be stated in specific, objective, and behavioral terms. Common descriptors have been provided for the supervisor to copy/paste into the Performance Improvement Plan or to modify as needed. See attachment.

Specific Action Required:
The desired behavior or action of employee. This should usually be a goal or milestone that can be measured or evaluated.

Completion Date:
Each specific action in the PIP will require varying time periods for completion. Some improvement areas may need to be immediate, such as reducing absenteeism or eliminating inappropriate comments. Other areas will take longer for the employee to complete, such as enhancing technical knowledge. Supervisors are encouraged to avoid lengthy completion dates, while giving the employee sufficient time to demonstrate improvement. The completion date should coincide with any key milestones or events that may be tied to the specific action required. A drop down window is provided with dates.

Person(s) Responsible:
In most cases the supervisor, the employee, or both will appear in this column. There are situations where another person is assisting the employee to reach a goal or milestone. For example, an employee who needs to strengthen his technical skills might shadow a team member; thus, that team member would be listed in this column along with the employee. This usually encompasses anyone that is critical in providing time, resources, or support for the employee to improve in that particular performance/development area.


thanks for the update!  have a good weekend if i don't see you!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

im leaving


The following folders will be moved to \\GTHOU-DV01\Common\TWMarketing at 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, February 20th (tomorrow).

\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_NNG\TW Desk
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_NNG\TW IOS Posting
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_NNG\TW Longterm
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_NNG\Restore TW Desk 020102
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TW_Flow
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TWFIN
\\GTHOU-DV01\Common\Marketing\TWHUB

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 713-853-7707 (office) or 877-678-3092 (pager).

Thanks,

glenda wagner
ETS Information Risk Management (Houston)


I went to Sheila's meeting.  Barbara and Jeff were there also.

Hmm.  Don't know about the faxed signature.  Feel free to call Carolyn
Campbell at King & Spalding and ask. 713 276 7307. Find out about faxed
signature, and whether tomorrow is too late.  We need the escrow account in
place by FRIDAY.

Is Mike Miller in? Ozzie would be fine, I guess.

Thanks,

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/03/2001 11:14 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: OOPS I forgot to attach the draft Certificate of Incumbency

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001
11:12 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/03/2001 11:11 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Certificate of Incumbency

Kay,

Bad news.  Ben also will not be in until tomorrow.

Do you want me to:

1. See if I can get a faxed signature for Ben (if Citibank will allow faxed
signatures)
2. Get Delainey, Pagan and Dietrich's signatures today and wait for Ben's
original signature tomorrow

I guess I missed Sheila's 10:00 meeting.  It's kind of confusing as to how
long we are supposed to attend her meetings since we are with the East Group
and she is with the West Group.  Did you go?  I am going to Barbara Gray's
meeting at 1:00.


Houston Astros Baseball season tickets are available sale to employees at their face value.  The seats range in price from $2,490 to $3,237 for the season, and are located in the box and club levels.

If you're interested in being on the list of potential buyers for Enron's season tickets to the Astro's 2002 home games, please indicate your interest by 4PM, Central Time on Thursday, March 21 via e-mail to Elizabeth Linnell.  In your e-mail, please indicate the number of seats you're interested in purchasing for the full season (no partial season or individual games).  Once the number of interested potential buyers is determined, we'll know whether a lottery process will need to take place to fairly allocate the purchase opportunities and will communicate that to respondents.

Please note that the season begins on Friday, March 29 so payment for the tickets will need to be made early next week.

If you have any questions, please call Elizabeth Linnell at x33896 or Rachel Tobor at x31481.


Ehud,

I shall contact both Helyette and Alex and make the arrangements.

Cheers.

Vince

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 05/02/2000 09:57:33 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: 1. Your Thur./Fri. Austin Trip; 2. Presentation of My
Risk-Management Optimization Model; 3. Enron On-Line

Vince,

>I shall definitely attend you presentation at Power 2000.
Thanks, I appreciate it.

>I shall ask about a guest accounton EOL. Typically, such an account allows
>an outside user to take a look at the system, but I don't think the traders
>will allow
>systematic access to the price data over a long period of time by a third
>party.
I quite understand, and will appreciate the ability to use the system while
the permission is applicable.

>Would you like to meet with me, Alex, Helyette for dinner Tuesday?
I would be delighted to join you, Alex and Helyette for dinner Tue.  When
that info is available, please advise when and where.

Look forward to seeing you Tue.  Best,
Ehud

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Department of Finance
     College and Graduate School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


Attached is CMTA's Press Release on the Governor's Economic Summit.  Also in the page, you'll find links to other correspondence concerning CMTA's proposals, including detailed descriptions of the initiatives, an opinion editorial placed in today's Los Angeles Daily News and a letter from Jack M. Stewart to Governor Davis.

In the coming months CMTA's theme will be "Turning California Around: Empowering Manufacturers to Lead the Way".  Please feel free to send us comments or suggestions.

<http://www.cmta.net/press/110201economic_summit.shtml>


You're so right. I've taken it out. I think that must have been a lapse in
brain cells for one of the traders!

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/19/2000 11:18 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 481838

kate, i don't think this deal should have a broker.

kerri


Thank you very much.

Daren J Farmer
01/31/2001 05:35 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Valero's February Gas Nominations

I forgot to get with you this morning on this.  I went ahead and changed the
volume to 24,000.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/31/2001 10:13 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Valero's February Gas Nominations

Thanks.
Also, Rohm & Haas, meter 1506, is looking for 24.000 for Feb. instead of
27.000.  They take the swing.  Would you like me to change the deal or keep
it as is?

Daren J Farmer
01/31/2001 08:13 AM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Valero's February Gas Nominations

You can change the tickets.  Thanks.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/31/2001 08:05 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Valero's February Gas Nominations

Daren - I am looking for 5.000/d at meter 1394 and 10.000/d at meter 8018 for
Feb.   Currently it is 10.000/d at 1394 and 5.000/d at 8018.  Can I change
the tickets or will you?  Attached is the confirmation spreadsheet from
Valero.

Thanks.

Aimee

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 07:54
AM ---------------------------

<DyckD@valero.com> on 01/30/2001 02:51:39 PM
To: alannou@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Valero's February Gas Nominations

Amy and Carlos,

Please find attached Valero's baseload natural gas nominations and
designated swing supply quantities for February 1-31 for the Houston and
Texas City Refineries as well as Valero's supply to the Clearlake Methanol
plant.
If you need to reach me please call me.

Dave

Phone: (210) 370-2799
Cell phone at (210) 241-9180
Pager (888) 691-5538

(See attached file: HPL_Noms0201.xls)
 - HPL_Noms0201.xls


David,

Mark Taylor asked me to talk to you about getting your ISDA Masters inputted
into our Financial Trading Database.  This databse is the central master
database where we keep records of the financial agreements in either draft
form or that have been executed.  London currently updates this database to
manage  its (and Singapore's) financial contracts and I would like to get the
Australian agreements plugged into the system.

This database serves a number of purposes.  First, it is our core memory of
contract negotiations.  Anyone in Legal and Credit around the world can take
a look at this database and determine who we have entered into contract with
and what negotiation issues may be at issue.  It is critical as we become a
global trading company that we are consistent in the legal positions we take
on these financial contracts.  For instance, it would be quite problematic if
someone in Houston was negotiating a contract with an ISDA counterparty and
asserted that a certain position was critical, if we find out a lawyer in
another office was negotiating with the same counterparty and gave on the
same position the day before.  We need to make a somewhat coordinated effort
on the counterparty front.

In addition, with so many masters and so many counterparties there is just no
way to keep track of what we have said or done unless we have a database.

Further, we use the information in the database to respond to inside
auditing, reporting and insurance inquiries.

For online trading, I check the database to see if we have a financial master
agreement and what trading restrictions we may or may not have in place.
Global contracts uses this database to confirm their financial contract
records and approval for online trading.

For both Houston and London we use the database to communicate with our
Clients, whether traders or  back office support people.  Employees outside
legal have  limited view access only to see all the information except the
confidential Legal and Credit comments.  They have no edit capabilities.  The
database also has some reporting functions that we and London Legal have
found helpful.

You should have gotten my email to Mike Neves, out database coordinator
requesting full edit access for you.  It usually takes a few days.  Once you
get access maybe you could find some time to surf the database, and we can
figure out how to get your ISDA data inputted..

Are you coming to the ENA Legal Conference in October?  That would be a good
time for me to do a full review of this database with you.


We have our first round United Way BIG WINNERS (of the valuable $25 gift
certificates to the Enron Signature Shop)!!

Margaret Carson
Karen Denne
Pat Keene
Lisa Feener

We will have another drawing early next week, so please logon now to
UnitedWay.enron.com.

This act of giving makes us all winners!  Thanks!


We have conference room 38C2 for tomorrow's call from 9-11.

Bill,
Is ACE okay with this time?
Carol


I have asked Linda Guinn to look into it. We have recently gone through some
changes in our accounting system and that may be the problem.

	"Bill W. Ogden" <bogden@ogwb.com>
	06/13/2000 05:12 PM
	Please respond to bogden

		 To: "Richard Sanders" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron/Natole

Richard:
 In looking at the Natole file today it was brought to my attention that we
have an outstanding bill for legal fees and expenses unpaid from February.

 The bill is invoice 00020782 dated 2/29/00 in the amount of $17,312.28.

 Could you please have someone look for this one and see if it can be
approved for payment?  Thanks in advance for your help.

 Best regards,

 Bill Ogden


Management Committee Meeting
Date:		Monday, October 29
Time:		11:00 a.m. (Central)
Location:	50th Floor Boardroom
Video:		Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf. Call:	Please contact me for dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting and through what medium.

_____	I will attend in person
_____	Via video conference
_____	Via conference call
_____	I will not attend

Please return this e-mail to me with your response.

Thanks,
Joannie
3-1769


-----Original Message-----
From:  Andrzej_Kabarowski@cargill.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Andrzej+5FKabarowski+40cargill+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:19 PM
To: Sacks, Edward; Andrzej_Kabarowski@cargill.com
Subject: PCGs between Enron N.A. and Cargill-Alliant

I am attaching the latest versions.  Most of the additional changes
were accepted in an attempt to get these executed asap, particularly as
I have been out of town the last week or so.  We did change payment
back to 10 days as this is essentially where our corporate treasury is
confident it can process such claims in a prudent manner.  I hope this
is not a deal breaker.  We did ultimately accept your Enron affiliate
set off language in your PCG to us, although we do not have such
language in our PCG to you.

Please reflect on the latest status.  I believe we do have a document
that we can both execute.  If your lawyers still have questions let me
know so I can refer them to our legal counsel if necessary.

Thank you and best regards

=============================
Andrzej Kabarowski
WW Credit Manager
Global Petroleum Trading
NatGas/Electricity Trading
CRMPG
-----------------------------
Tel: 952-984 3664
Fax: 952-984 3763
=============================

 - ECTRcapcg1.doc
 - ECTRcglpcg1.doc


Leaf finished his shift at 6 a.m. today - he'll be back at 6 p.m. But I
talked to Bill Williams about it and he saw the trade in the Real Time log,
and said he remembers hearing Leaf do the trade with Sempra. If you have a
number for Harry at Sempra, I'd be glad to give him a call and figure this
out. Let me know.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   04/03/2001 10:47 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: DEAL 567990.01

Kate,
Deal 567990.01, trader at Sempra, does not show this trade.   Harry from the
backoffice called.
Please ask Leaf.

Thanks
Stephanie


On Friday, I attended a meeting with Ken Lay and Karen Denne that Mike Peevey
and David Freeman requested.  Mike Peevey was President of Southern
California Edison before founding NEV (which he eventually sold to AES).
Freeman is General Manager of LADWP.

The Governor hired Peevey to be his chief energy advisor.  Freeman is the
Governor,s chief negotiator responsible for signing power contracts on behalf
of DWR now that the Legislature has passed AB1X and the Governor has signed
it.  John Burton, the leader of the State Senate, is responsible for getting
the Freeman the job of chief negotiator, but Peevey was clearly in charge.

Also at the meeting was Vikram Budraja, former SVP of power systems and
planning for Edison.  He,s now a private consultant that Freeman hired to
help him with the contract negotiations.

Peevey asked for the meeting to urge Enron to respond to DWR,s RFP issued on
Friday.  Peevey/Freeman want to announce a package of deals on Tuesday.  They
implied that they,ve already got some deals done and expect to have 8+ deals
to announce on Tuesday, though they gave no details other than to say that
they,ve got a deal with Calpine (as reported in the press).  Their plan is to
announce on Tuesday the names of the suppliers they,ve signed with, the total
number of megawatts signed, and the average price per MW.  They are concerned
that the media will want them to make public the details of each individual
deal, which for obvious reasons they don,t want to do.

Peevey and Freeman also said that they don,t want to sign too many long-term
contracts though they recognize that there,s a trade-off between term and
price.

Ken Lay told them that Enron would respond.  ENA is preparing a response.  He
also told them that EES was working on a plan to reduce demand at our
customers, facilities and that the plan would be completed and ready for
implementation very soon.

I,ve summarized the points that Ken Lay made and the responses from Peevey
and Freeman:

It would be difficult to enter into contracts without some assurance that DWR
is creditworthy.

Response from Peevey/Freeman:
AB1X provides DWR the funds necessary*beginning on Friday, Feb 1st*to
purchase the power necessary to fill the utilities, short position.  Ken Lay
pressed them on this point and Peevey insisted that AB1X provides the funds
needed to pay suppliers.

The RFP should give suppliers maximum flexibility in coming up with proposals.

Response from Peevey/Freeman:
Be as creative as possible.  All offers will be considered (despite the
language contained in the RFP).

The only customers who have been protected from California,s failed
restructuring law are customers who chose another provider under Direct
Access.  In addition, one of the quickest ways to help solve California,s
shortage is to work with customers to reduce demand and develop on-site
generation.  Taking away Direct Access and access to customers generally*as
AB1X does*is therefore a dumb idea and must be reversed.

Response from Peevey:
He agreed but said that it was impossible to remove it from the bill.  He
affirmed what we already know*that the head of the Senate oversight committee*
Debra Bowen*is working on a &clean-up8 bill to remove the prohibition.  In
response to Ken Lay,s points that California needed to make sure that utility
interconnection and stand-by rates didn,t continue to impede on-site
generation, Peevey and Freeman said that the Governor understood the problem
and was prepared to fix it.

Siting laws have got to be streamlined and California (i.e., the Governor)
has got to credibly commit to the swift development of new power plants in
order to push the forward curve down.

Response from Peevey/Freeman:
The Governor is scheduled to offer a plan this week that is targeted at
expediting siting and development.

DWR should accept demand reduction bids at the same time that it accepts
supply-side bids.

Response from Peevey/Freeman:
They agreed but said that there is extreme political pressure to announce the
signing of some supply deals on Tuesday in order to prove to legislators that
DWR will be able to keep the lights on, and at a &reasonable8 price.  They
also need to sign some deals in light of the fact that the feds are very
unlikely to extend the DOE order forcing suppliers to sell to the IOUs.  Once
they,ve shown that they can manage the supply side, Peevey and Freeman said
they want to quickly turn their attention to demand-side bidding.

These are the highlights.  I,d be happy to give more details on the Monday
morning \call.

Best,
Jeff


Hi Maureen:

Steve should have received via fax from Scott Govenar a letter to Hertzberg
and Burton from the Republican leadership in the CA Legislature.  The letter
1) conveys a strong willingness on the part of the Republicans to work
together to solve the problem and 2) provides an outline of the key
components of a comprehensive solution.  Could you please get a copy of the
letter to Rosalee; and Rosalee could you get a copy of the letter to Ken
Lay?    Thanks very much for your help.

Best,
Jeff


Do you know what to do here?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 04:13 PM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	08/21/2000 03:54 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Swap deal with EPMI Long Term Hedge

Susan/Tana,

We have recently traded a deal on Enron Online in which the entity offering
the trade was ENA and the entity entering the trade was EPMI Long Term Hedge
(Power group hedging with ENA).  This is currently booked as RMT vs. EPMI
Long Term Hedge.  Can we send out a confirmation based on ISDA terms since
this is an Enron subsidiary per Global Counterparty?  I'm assuming this is
just like doing a deal with Enron Global Exploration and Production, EES or
ECT International, but let me know if I'm incorrect.

Thanks,
Joe


Mike/Clint-

Water consumption/make-up at Austin is as follows:

Water Make-up rate from the water plant into the demin tank is 120 gpm
Water Usage Rate of the plant at full load is 234.4 gpm

Therefor, when the plant is not running, the tank (300,000 gallon capacity)
is filled at the rate of 120 gpm;
when the plant is running flat out, the net drawdown on the tank is 114.4 gpm
(234.4-120=114.4).

If you do the math, if you start out Monday morning at 6 am and run the plant
for 5 days a week for 15 hours a day, then come Friday evening at 9 pm, there
will
be 44,400 gallons in the tank.  It will then take you 35.5 hours to fill the
tank again which is Sunday at 8:30 am.  If you do the math, you could
potentially run the plant for a full 15 hours on Saturday, but at the end of
the day you would only have 6,240 gallons left in the tank and you could not
fill it in time for Monday morning.

GE's performance program states that the LM6000 without water injection has a
NOx level of about 200 ppm.  Our SCR reduces NOx about 80% (down to 5 ppm)
WITH water injection.  WIthout water injection and starting at 200 ppm the
SCR is probably not going to give you 80% effectiveness, but it might keep us
under the instantaneous NOx limit set out in our permit (~100 ppm).  I will
have to do a little more research on this one.

Based on some initial calculations that we did early on, with a constant
pipeline pressure, heat rate improves by approximately 50 btu/kwh (HHV) for
every 10oF of drop in ambient temperature.  When we run the plant this
summer, we can obviously get some better data.

Hope this helps,

Eric


Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Effective immediately, I have returned to the University of
Pennsylvania.

The usual automatically-generated contact info should appear below;
please update your files.

Best regards,

Frank

--
Francis X. Diebold

Department of Economics
University of Pennsylvania
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297

fdiebold@mail.sas.upenn.edu
http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold

(215) 898-1507  telephone
(215) 573-4217  fax


The following report contains confidential and sensitive information.  Please treat with discretion.

Executive Summary:
?	FERC price cap decision reflects Bush political and economic objectives. Politically, Bush is determined to let the crisis blame fall on Davis; from an economic perspective, he is unwilling to create disincentives for new power generation
?	Davis finds four major flaws with FERC plan, most notably its exclusion of out-of-state generators
?	June 1st "kill clause" for FERC order could coincide with new Bush regional plan
?	California facing growing fiscal risk following bond downgrade, expected $20 billion power bill this summer--economic crisis would force deeper Administration involvement
?	QF bid for advance payments from PG&E likely to fail in bankruptcy court
?	New generation delays probable because of State/QF squabbling
?	Consumer groups are preparing a constitutional challenge to SoCal bailout deal

1.	FERC Fallout
The FERC decision is a holding move by the Bush administration that looks like action, but is not.  Rather, it allows the situation in California to continue to develop virtually unabated.  The political strategy appears to allow the situation to deteriorate to the point where Davis cannot escape shouldering the blame.  Once they are politically inoculated,  the Administration can begin to look at regional solutions.  Moreover, the Administration has already made explicit (and will certainly restate in the forthcoming Cheney commission report) its opposition to stronger price caps on the grounds that they are unwilling to create disincentives to the construction of new generation.

It is interesting and ironic to note that electricity generators were generally happy with the FERC order and that the only FERC commissioner who favors price caps actually voted against this plan.

2.	Something Less than Effective Price Caps
 From Davis's point of view, the FERC plan has four major flaws:
?	The order applies only to California, not to the rest of the west. Non-California generators are not required to sell at capped rates to California.
?	As the order is written, it is more of a price floor for emergency power than a ceiling.
?	State officials also believe that energy suppliers will continue to game the system, because the price mitigation scheme only kicks in after a Stage 2 emergency and does not require any collusion.
?	Even when the price caps kick in, they are based on the cost-plus for the highest cost producer supplying power to California and do not require wholesalers to abide by the cap.  The generators can also charge above the cap, provided they can subsequently justify the excess charge to FERC.

3.	Proposal "Kill Clause" Adds to the Political Dilemma for Davis
The FERC proposal includes a "kill clause" that says the caps will be withdrawn unless California's ISO agrees by June 1st to become part of the regional grid now under FERC control.  If Davis doesn't sign on to the regional grid by June 1st, then he will have to live with June 2nd headlines blaming him for letting the "Bush price caps plan" collapse.

4.	Growing Fiscal Risk in California
Sources speculate that California  could therefore pay as much as $20 billion on power this summer - this is more  than the combined enterprise value of PG&E and SCE.  These sources believe that, because of the severity of the situation, the FERC and/or the  federal government will be forced to take further action to control prices for  power.

The consensus is that the state of California will run out of money in about 90 days. One of the first projects to be cancelled will be state plans to finance new power plant construction in exchange for long-term power deals.  The bleak fiscal picture is also causing bank creditors to revisit the bridge loans they are providing to California.

The Bush Administration and the Fed are only now waking up to the seriousness of the fiscal picture.  The country's largest and most prosperous state will have gone from large surpluses to serious debt downgrades and devastating deficits in a matter of months.

5.	QFs to Seek Advance Payment from PG&E
Meanwhile, on the bankruptcy front, the QFs reportedly  will ask the bankruptcy judge today to give them advance payment from PGE's  accounts, since their natural gas vendors have likewise demanded advance payment  for gas. It appears very unlikely that the QFs' request will be granted. If the  QFs do not receive advance payment, it is likely that most of the 4,000 mw  of gas-fired QF capacity will remain offline.

6	Delays Likely in New QF Generation
The QF deals made with the state for long-term contracts are  being continually renegotiated, which is likely to mean that the new plants  those contracts are supposed to finance will not be online as early as  anticipated.

7.	Consumer Groups Ready to Challenge Constitutionality of SCE Bailout Plan
Harvey  Rosenfield and his colleagues reportedly have been reviewing an analysis  of the MOU for the SCE bailout  plan.  The analysis was done by a  utilities analyst, rather than a lawyer, though it appears to raise a number of  good legal points. For example, one of the elements of the MOU is a "non-bypassable" charge  on ratepayers that would require  them to pay even if they disconnect from the grid. This is effectively a tax,  since there is no exchange of value  for money, which under the CA constitution cannot be used to directly  benefit a private entity.  This makes  the bonds that would be issued are general obligation bonds, rather than revenue  bonds. According to the constitution, the state cannot be put into debt to  benefit a private company.  For this and other reasons, even if the  Republicans would vote for the SCE bailout, which remains  unlikely, the bailout probably would not  stand a likely constitutional challenge.

8.	Governor Hurt by Continued Failure to Disclose Long-Term Power Contracts
The issue of the Governor's failure to  disclose the details of the long-term power  contracts continues to  distress the other players in the  crisis.  Even if he were to  disclose everything he and his staff have been negotiating, it is likely that their actions and negotiations will challenged, creating an even further delay.


A heartwarming story of the advances of women in achieving equality throughout the world.  Barbara Walters did a story on gender roles in Kuwait several years before the Gulf War.  She noted then that women customarily walked about 10 feet behind their husbands.  She returned to Kuwait recently and observed that the men now walked several yards behind their wives.  Ms. Walters approached one of the women and said, "This is marvelous.  Can you tell the free world just what enabled women here to achieve this reversal of roles?"

"Land mines," said the Kuwaiti woman.


The phone numbers for the California War Room are:

    713-345-8325
    713-345-9855

Thanks,
Marcia


how are finals going?  what day are you going to come to houston?  any time
is fine, just let me know.  should be a fun weekend.  we can head out
downtown afterwards and hit some of the wierd clubs.  good luck with the rest
of you finals.

matt


I'll have Dave Poston fix it and get back to you.

Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/15/2001 01:49 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 541100

Hi Kate, I know you are working on this problem.  This deal will not let me
save it because it wants the schedule type filled in.  Let me know if there
is a schedule type I can choose or if I should just wait until the problem is
fixed.

Thanks,
Melissa


Response: Reply from J A S  d 1
You are stupid

Your Message:
> Fr:Dana.Davis@enron.com
> Su:RE:
> Now come on.  We're talking about Kevin; Arkansas, the woods and his
> gun.  BIG COUNTRY!!
>
> Fr: joe.s@my2way.com
>
> Response: Reply from J A S  d 1
> Sure will, why you call him big country
>
> Your Message:
> > Fr:Dana.Davis@enron.com
> Su:
> Kevin and Candis drove to Arkansas Friday night.  You know Big Country
> has to try to deer hunt.  Pray for me cause I'm flying out on
> Wednesday
> > night.
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
> sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
> disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
> the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
> message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be
> an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
> enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and
> the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by
> anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> > **********************************************************************


Per my voice mail,  attached is an alternative to the language originally
proposed re:  statutory reference in the ISDA choice of law clause.  David
Mitchell and I discussed the issue and believe that the statutory reference
is fine. We note that the statutory threshold --  contracts "arising out of
a transaction covering in the aggregate not less than $250,000"  -- will
likely be met either with each confirm individually or with all confirms in
the aggregate .

Please do not hesitate to contact David at (212) 504-6285 or me at (212)
504-6261 to discuss this further.

(See attached file: Governing Law 2.doc)

Joan A. Stumpf
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, New York  10038
Tel:  (212) 504-6261
Fax:   (212) 504-6666

                    David
                    Mitchell             To:     Joan Stumpf/NY/CWT@CWT
                                         cc:
                    12/13/2000           Subject:
                    02:57 PM

per our t/c
---------------------- Forwarded by David Mitchell/NY/CWT on 12/13/2000
02:59 PM ---------------------------

Robert.Bruce@enron.com@enron.com on 12/12/2000 06:50:11 PM

To:   dmitchel@cwt.com
cc:   Mark.Taylor@enron.com
Subject:

(See attached file: Governing Law.doc)As we discussed, enclosed is the
standard choice of law provision of our ISDA schedule, red-lined to show
how the statutory reference might be worded.  Mark Taylor and I are
interested in your thoughts on the matter. -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com
(See attached file: Governing Law.doc)

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or
disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are
believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened,
it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and
no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================

 - Governing Law 2.doc
 - Governing Law.doc


Per Sheila's request, I am forwarding this memo to you.


AND ALL THAT GREEN SHIT THAT WAS GROWING WILL DIE, AS WILL SOME DEER COME THE WEEKENED OF THE 15TH

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Parks, Joe;
kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: Lease Update

Band of snow about to cross the lease...forecast for tomorrow is for
snow accumulations of an inch. Currently 36 dg. w/ n-ne winds at 26,
gusting to 30 w/ flurries on the way. Think the deer are active? I'm
pissed!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:40 AM
To: knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com;
kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Brian Constantine
Subject: Lease Update

Deer All:

Keith, great looking buck! Chris, I can't believe you passed that deer
up.
Very generous.

Chad shot a nice 10 point. Very impressive hunt. He hunted boneyard in
the
morning, then hopped the fence into the robertson pasture and rattled
the
deer withing 10 yards or so and managed to connect on a running shot as
the
deer bolted away.

I fed my Python a gobbler at LoneStar. Then shot a solid schlocho at the

Hole sunday morning.

Pictures forthcoming.

Joe's beginner's honeymoon has come to an end. He saw nothing decent
everywhere he went.

Brian saw an impressive young 9 pt at booger. Jim videotaped it the next

morning. 21" wide or so, short tines. Very tempting deer, but all agreed

that it was 4.5 and should go another year.

Dogs could not find Jim's deer. Dogs headed from last blood due south to

fence at highway.

Feeders are all in good shape, except Boneyard. It is running at 7 and
4:30.
But weak. Chris indicated it needed a bigger battery. We considered
putting
a magnum on it, but if all it needs is a new battery, we'll leave it to
you.
We should get it running well, lots of deer in that area. One good
schlocho
and a bladed spike that needs to be shot. I put a new battery in
Lonestar
and we filled it up. Booger topped off with motor run time increased.
30-30
was empty. We filled it up. Pig filled up an run time increased. We have

lots of corn, so if a feeder is not dropping lots of corn, turn up the
spin
time and keep em full. Dropping extra corn also worked well at mesquite
and
showtime..
Mertz will feed protien next week. I consulted with Chris and houston
boys
openning weekend regarding mertz offer to let us buy extra protien this
fall, since he had met the quota. We agreed to see what he would feed
but
cap it at $500, spread across the board.

Looks like Houston boys will be retruning December 15th weekend and
closing
weekend. I'll be bringing Henry on next trip and think it would be great
if
Keitha nd boys would be there too.

Hope Keith and Jim can make it back as soon as possible. We winterized
trailer on way out. Keg almost empty.

e.

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Roger,  Attached is the form we discussed.


Here is the revised bullet sheet along with the draft agreement.


Dear Gail,

Please resend your resume in a ".doc" format.  We are unable to open the
attachment below.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

"Gail Whipple" <gwhipple@us.ibm.com> on 12/28/2000 09:24:36 AM
To: jeff.skilling@enron.com
cc: "sam palmisano" <sam_palmisano@us.ibm.com>, "khalil barsoum"
<barsoum@us.ibm.com>

Subject: Resume

As you and Sam Palmisano discussed, here's a copy of my resume for your use
with your executive team. Can't tell you how excited I am at the
opportunity to work with you and your whole team to really exploit the
business relationship between Enron and IBM. I'll be scheduling time to
meet all of you as soon as possible.

Happy holidays.

(See attached file: Resume.lwp)

Gail P. Whipple
Vice President, Telecommunications & Media Industries
IBM Global Services
Building 4, Somers, NY
8/826-4460, (914) 766-4460
 - Resume.lwp


okey dokey

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 11/14/2000 01:46 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Assignment Provisions in GE Breakouts - Important

Kay - I know ENA is planning to hand the breakout K to ESA as a done deal,
but Lisa Alfaro really should at least get a look at the assignment
provisions so Brett and Enron can know what his constraints are with respect
to a possible sale of all the SA assets, as well as the ease with which they
can go into the Elektrobolt project.

Could you send that portion of the contract to her?

I have asked Lisa and Brett to confirm that their understanding about the
deal is the same as  Ben's.

Rose
----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 01:42 PM -----

	Ben F Jacoby@ECT
	Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
	11/14/2000 01:36 PM

		 To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Important - Second Closing - LM6000s

Rose:

Sheila provided final comments on the option agreement a couple of days ago.
I believe it's in Lisa Alfaro's court.

GE is on board, and I think the final breakout contract should be completed
this week. Kay Mann / Sheila Tweed are coordinating with GE, and I will defer
to them on this point.

I think that's it.

Regards,

Ben

From: Roseann Engeldorf@ENRON on 11/14/2000 11:54 AM
To: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammy
Brennig/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Kimball/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Cilia/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter N
Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, "Mark Thurber"
<MTHURBER@skadden.com>, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, fporto@andrews-kurth.com,
pseve@andrews-kurth.com, Gina Karathanos/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Kimball/NA/Enron@Enron,
Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy Muchmore/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Important - Second Closing - LM6000s

Ben and Brett -

I do not know your target timing to move the LMs; however, you need to be
aware that funding from the bank structure to pay for them requires that we
go through a full second closing process.  It may take several days to pull
together all the documents and information needed for this closing - we will
have to deliver Brazil counsel opinions, Cayman counsel opinions, another A&K
opinion and deliver a multitude of other corporate and security documents too
boring to list here.

So - as soon as:

1)  the break-out contract is ready;

2) GE is on board; and

3) ESA, ENA and WLB have signed off on the purchase option transfer
document(s) (which must include Matt,  Mary Kimball and Mary Cilia
sign-off),

we can finalize the "second closing" docs for the bank - we have already
started on them, but it will take a focused effort to finish them and receive
all signatures necessary.

Ben and Brett must let Rob Taylor of A&K - at 713-220-4436 know when the
above items are complete - he will need to coordinate with the team to push
for final docs.

Lisa Alfaro - will you please coordinate with Rob Taylor at the above number
and Frederico Porto at A&K in Dallas at 214-659-4447 on the Brazil-based
issues?

I also ask that Ben and Brett be available to the deal team to consult and
answer questions as necessary.

I am going to be out of town for a week on another year-end deal and will
check my voice mails regularly.   My assistant, Melba Trevino at 835-7664
will have my contact details.

Please call Rob, me or Tammy (345-3870) with any questions.

Rose


---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000
02:38 PM ---------------------------

Liz M Taylor@ECT
10/27/2000 02:37 PM
To: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ENW Org Chart

Sherri,

Will these two pages help you?  Louise Kitchen and Philippe Bibi are Greg's
direct reports.  All the commercial folks roll up to Louise and Technical
folks (slide 2) report up to Bibi.  EOL (Andy Zipper & Team) report to Louise
Kitchen.


Hi Stuart,

I'm assuming (very dangerous) that you are handling this, as this project
does not ring a bell with me.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/12/2000 01:42
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
10/12/2000 01:37 PM
To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: letter to Manhattan Village re: Roadway improvements

Kay:
FYI.
Fred

---------------------- Forwarded by Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 01:36 PM
---------------------------

Fred Mitro
10/12/2000 01:36 PM
To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: letter to Village re: Roadway improvements

Stuart:

Here is the letter I mentioned.  Take a look and let me know if you have any
issues with it.  Our goal is to fax it to the Village later this afternoon,
if possible.

Thanks,
Fred
---------------------- Forwarded by Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 01:33 PM
---------------------------

"Farrell, Eileen - CHI" <eileen.farrell@piperrudnick.com> on 10/12/2000
01:01:53 PM
To: "'fred.mitro@enron.com'" <fred.mitro@enron.com>
cc: "Gershon, Mark A. - CHI" <Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com>
Subject: Enron Letter to James M. Doyle.WPD

Please call Mark Gershon to discuss the attached.  Thank you.

 <<Enron Letter to James M. Doyle.WPD>>

____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - Enron Letter to James M. Doyle.WPD


Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange
The Internet Newsletter for the True Texas Longhorn Faithful

Volume 11, No. 7, December 4, 2000

Longhorns Will Face Pac-10 Tri-Champion
Oregon in Culligan Holiday Bowl December 29

The 12th-ranked Longhorns, who haven't finished in the AP top 10 since 1983,
can wipe out 17 years of frustration on Dec. 29 in San Diego by beating No. 8
Oregon in the Culligan Holiday Bowl.
While that's easy to say, it will be much harder to accomplish. The Ducks
went 9-2 overall and tied BCS-bowl teams Washington and Oregon State for the
Pac 10 championship with a 7-1 record. Texas has the same overall and league
record at 9-2 and 6-1.
The Holiday Bowl game starts at 7:30 p.m. Texas time and will be nationally
televised by ESPN.
Now, before I get back to the matchup, let me urge all Longhorn fans to buy
tickets and attend this game.
Why? Because one major criteria for getting one of the eight elite BCS bowl
bids is fan loyalty. The Longhorn team forgot to show up for the Cotton Bowl
last year and so did Longhorn fans, who didn't fill their ticket quota.
Bowl folks notice things like that. Coach Mack Brown has Texas poised for a
long run at top 10 status and our fans need to be in the top 10, too, to help
the team land good bowl games.
So please buy some tickets (the information  is on page 2) and take a few
days to enjoy San Diego. It will help the Longhorns in this bowl game and it
will help them get in future ones.
That's it with the sermon. Let's get back to the bowl matchup.
Brown called the game "an exciting matchup and a great challenge for both
programs."
"Both teams are very well respected state institutions with a great deal of
pride and tradition," Brown said. He also called Oregon's coach, Mike
Bellotti, "a personal friend," and said "he has done a great job of building"
that program.
Bellotti boats a 48-22 record in six season at Oregon and has taken the Ducks
to bowl games in five of his six years at the helm.
Oregon has lost only eight games in the last three years, going 8-3 in 1998,
9-3 in 1999 and 9-2 in 2000.
Oregon was picked to finish in the middle of the pack in the Pac 10 after
racking up nine wins in 1999 with a senior-laden team.
But Bellotti rebuilt his offense around strong-armed junior QB Joey
Harrington, 6-4, 210, and junior college transfer RB Maurice Morris, 6-0,
205, and found competent replacements for eight lost defensive starters to
produce a surprisingly good team that lost only two games all season.
Harrington completed 195 of 375 passes (52%) and the Ducks ranked 25th
nationally in passing with 257.7 yards per game.
Harrington threw 20 touchdown passes while being intercepted 13 times.
Morris filled the void at running back by averaging 100.5 yards a game. He
ran for 1,106 yards and eight touchdowns.
Senior WR Marshaun Tucker, 5-10, 185, was the team's leading receiver with 50
receptions for 871 yards and six touchdowns. Sophomore WR Keenon Howry, a
5-10, 165-pound speedster, is another outstanding receiver.
Defensively, tackles Jason Nikolao, 6-2, 300, and Jed Boice, 6-4, 295, end
Saul Patu, 6-3, 265, and LB Matt Smith, 6-4, 247, are the team leaders.
The Ducks' defensive philosophy is to "stop the run and don't get beat deep
on pass plays."
Let's hope they don't make that work in the Holiday Bowl because the Horns
live on beating people deep on pass plays, and they also like to run the
football.
The Ducks beat Rose Bowl representative Washington, 23-16, during the regular
season and were undefeated in the Pac 10 until the final week of the regular
season when they lost to arch-rival Oregon State, 23-13.
Their only other loss was in their second game to then No. 4-ranked
Wisconsin, 27-23.
Their other victories were over Nevada, 36-7; Idaho, 42-13; UCLA, 29-10; USC,
28-17; Arizona, 14-10, Arizona State, 56-55; Washington State, 27-24, and
California, 25-17.
The wins over Arizona State and Washington State were in overtime.
The Longhorns have won six games in a row after a 3-2 start and they can beat
the Ducks and make it seven in a row if they can win four key battles.
To win, the Longhorns have to be able to run the ball better than the Ducks,
they have to get a fast start offensively, they must win the turnover battle
and they have to get another great effort from their outstanding defense.
Against Texas A&M, the Longhorns got a terrible start offensively and failed
to even make a first down in the first quarter.
But they were able to keep the early lead because safety Greg Brown scored on
a 10-yard pass interception on the Aggies' first offensive plays.
They probably won't be able to count on scoring a quick defensive touchdown
against Oregon, which is why getting a fast start offensively is one of the
main keys to the game's outcome.
Here's how the teams compared statistically at the end of the regular season
(national rank in parenthesis):
Texas                            Oregon
Offense
(60)   145.5         Rushing Avg.           (52) 151.2
(14)   293.2         Passing Avg.           (25) 257.7
(14)   438.7        Total Off. Avg.     (34) 408.9
(8)     38.6       Scoring Avg            (42)   28.7
Defense
(12)     94.0        Rushing Avg.           (31) 124.0
(17)   184.3         Passing Avg.           (45) 207.1
(7)   273.3       Total Def. Avg.         (32) 331.1
(11)     17.9    Opp. Scoring Avg           (31)   19.9

Bowl Ticket Information

Longhorn fans can purchase tickets to the Culligan Holiday Bowl in San Diego
by contacting the UT ticket office at 512-471-3333 or 800-982-BEVO or by
logging on to the athletic department website at www.TexasSports.com
You can save $6 by buying your tickets throught the UT ticket office. Tickets
are $46 each if bought through the bowl ticket office, but they are $40 each
if purchased through either school's athletic ticket office.

Big 12 Gets 7 Teams in Bowls

Seven Big 12 teams are going to bowl games, headed by top-ranked Oklahoma,
which will play Florida State in the Jan. 3 FedEx Orange Bowl in Miami in a
matchup that is expected to produce the national championship team.
Big 12 Southern Division runner-up Texas plays Pac-10 tri-champ Oregon in the
Dec. 29 Culligan Holiday Bowl in San Diego.
Texas A&M will go against Mississippi State and former Aggie coach Jackie
Sherrill in the Sanford Independence Bowl in Shreveport on Dec. 31.
Northern Division co-champion Kansas State will play Tennessee in the Jan. 1
Cotton Bowl in Dallas, and the other Northern co-champ, Nebraska, will play
Northwestern in the Dec. 30 Alamo Bowl in San Antonio.
Texas Tech kicks off the league's bowl activity on Dec. 27 against East
Carolina in the inaugural Galleryfurniture.com Bowl in Houston.
Iowa State plays in its first bowl game in 22 years in the Insight.com Bowl
in Phoenix on Dec. 28 against Pittsburgh.

900 Number Updated Daily

I update my 900 number daily with football and football recruiting news. The
number is 1-900-288-8839. It costs $1.59 a minute. You must be 18 to call.

Coaches Waiting for a Few Top Recruits to Come Aboard

Coach Mack Brown and his assistant coaches already have enough top recruits
to assure them of their third straight top 10 class, and it could challenge
for the top spot again if things fall right.
Texas has 19 commitments already (the list is on page 4), and the Horns
probably will sign six or seven more players.
The Longhorns will challenge for the No. 1 spot again if most of them come
from a group of nine top national recruits that includes DT Tommie Harris of
Killeen Ellison, LB Derrick Johnson of Waco, OL Jami Hightower of
Jacksonville, S Derrick Johnson of Temple, Ath Quan Cosby of Mart, DE
Jonathan Jackson and TE James Moses, both of Galena Park North Shore, OL
William Winston of Houston Madison and DL Kaelen Jakes of Valencia, Cal.
The good news in this recruiting season is that Texas has cleaned up in every
critical area except the defensive line. That makes the bad news pretty
obvious: if Texas doesn't sign both Harris and Jakes, the class will come up
short in the big guys up front in the defensive line.
But even that cloud has a silver lining. This was the year of the offensive
lineman in Texas. Next year will be the year of the defensive lineman. There a
re more good ones than I have seen in several years.
The Longhorns cleaned up on offensive linemen this year and they should be
able to clean up on defensive linemen next year.
I have already seen four junior defensive tackles who are better than anybody
except Harris in this year's senior class.
I spotted one of them, Rodrique Wright of Alief Hastings, the first week of
the season when I went to Houston to watch the Galena Park North
Shore-Hastings game.
I was there primarily to look at Jackson and Moses, but Wright was the most
dominant player on the field. At 6-5 and 315 pounds, he was able  to stuff
the run and he showed the quickness and upper body strength to get off blocks
quickly and rush the passer.
Mesquite's Marco Martin, 6-4, 285, 4.7, is generally regarded as the state's
top defensive line prospect next recruiting season. He is so quick he doubles
as a running back.
But Wright is the most physical defensive tackle I have seen in the junior
ranks. Suffice it to say that both Wright and Martin will be top national
recruits next year.
Wright's 40 time is in the 5.0 to 5.1 range, but he has as much quickness
over 10 to 15 yards, the key distance for defensive tackles, as any of the
guys who might outrun him in a 40.
The other two top junior DTs I have seen this year are Earl Anderson, 6-4,
275, 4.9, of San Marcos, and Patrick Lee, 6-4, 295, 5.0, Dallas Carter.
The Longhorns will have great shots at Wright, Anderson and Lee, who all list
Texas among their favorites. They also will be in the hunt for Martin.
While I have only seen them on tape, there are several other junior DTs who
will be highly recruited next year.
They include Damon Brown, 6-4, 260, 4.9, of Houston Washington; Tully
Jontzen, 6-3, 270, 4.9, of Keller; Jarre Rhodes, 6-4, 260, 4.9, of Dallas
Lincoln, and David Johnson, 6-3, 270, 5.0, of Aldine Nimitz.
Since the Longhorns are down to recruiting a handful of players to complete
this year's recruiting class, let's look for a moment at some of the other
top juniors who will be the "difference makers" next year.
There are two junior QBs college coaches everywhere know about. They are
Reggie McNeal, 6-3, 180, 4.6, of Lufkin, and Vincent Young, 6-5, 200, 4.5, of
Houston Madison. McNeal is Arkansas' No. 1 recruiting target in Texas next
year.
Both are outstanding runners who also have strong arms.
TE Eric Winston, 6-6, 270, 5.0, is the second best player at Midland Lee,
behind super senior RB Cedric Benson, who is committed to Texas. Winston is a
devastating blocker who probably will move to the offensive line in college.
He is a strong A&M lean and has been to the Aggies' summer camp.
Travis Leitko, 6-5, 255, 4.7, of The Woodlands, is an outstanding defensive
end. If he was a senior this year, he would have colleges from everywhere
clamoring for his signature.
At LB, Marvin Byrdsong, 6-3, 240, 4.5, of Longview; Andy Matakis, 6-3, 225,
4.6, of Corpus Christi Flower Bluff and Archie McDaniel, 6-3, 225, 4.7, of
Bay City, are already established stars.
L'Tydrick Riley, 6-4, 215, 4.5, of Crockett, who also plays QB very well,
Kendrick Muckelroy, 6-0, 190, 4.4, of Hallsville, and Michael Cuba, 6-3, 190,
4.5, of Taylor, are great safety prospects as juniors.
Now let's get back to this year's recruits.
I thought Benson and Midland Lee might be in trouble Saturday against
defensive powerhouse Duncanville, which hadn't allowed any team to score more
than 17 points all year.
Benson, the Energizer Bunny of the high school running backs, carried 35
times for 200 yards and four touchdowns and scored another TD on a 51-yard
screen pass to pace the Rebels to a 44-9 victory.
Benson now ranks No. 5 among all the high school running backs in Texas
history in yardage gained with 8,076. He is the only Class 5A rusher in Class
5A in the top 20.
Kenneth Hall, the Class B terror at Sugar Land from 1950 through 1953, holds
the record at 11,232 yards. He was an amazing runner, but he never ran
against the kind of defenses Benson faces every week.
Benson has led Midland Lee to back-to-back state champsionships, but he lost
most of his supporting cast after last season and the Rebels looked
vulnerable this season, losing two early-season games.
But his rebuilt line is getting better every week and Duncanville coach Bob
Alpert, who has been coaching at the 5A level in Texas for many years, first
in the Houston area and now in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex, has seen and
played against a lot of great running backs, but he says Benson is in a class
by himself.
"He's the best high school running back I've seen, and he's by far the best
one that one of my teams has had to try to stop," Alpert said.
What makes Benson so special?
"It doesn't take a rocket scientist," Alpert said. "He's got great vision,
he's really quick through the hole, he can get something if there isn't much
there, he's hard to bring down and he has great, really great balance. He's
also got really good speed, and he runs as hard on his 30th carry as he does
on his first one."
And, of course, the high school coach to end all  high school coaches, the
legendary Gordon Wood, long retired after winning state titles galore at
Stamford and Brownwood, put his stamp of approval on Benson after his junior
year, saying, "Benson is the best all-around high school running back I've
ever seen."
I've moved Benson to the top spot on my "difference maker" list on the
previous page. With endorsements from guys like Wood and Alpert, he's
obviously an awesome prospect.
By the way, an interesting and fairly obscure note on Wood's career is that
he's the guy who ended the Breckinridge dynasty in Texas.
If you remember Chuck Moser and his mighty Abilene Eagle dynasty and its
multi-year winning streak in the 1950s, there is a connection to Breckinridge
there, too.
The reason Abilene won all those games in a row was that the Eagles quit
playing Breckinridge. That long winning streak started the week after
Breckinridge thumped Abilene by three touchdowns. I think the score was
34-13, and it was a whipping.
But the team Breckinridge really had the hex on was Brownwood. The Lions had
never beaten Breckinridge and it was a really sore topic of conversation
around Brownwood.
Back in those days, Class 4A was the big school class. Abilene was Class 4A
and Breckinridge was Class 3A. Both teams won state regularly.
But Breckinridge fell down to Class 2A one year, and fell into Stamford's
district. Wood's Stamford team beat the Buckaroos that year en route to
another state title.
Folks in Brownwood noticed that the little 2A school was 1-0 against the team
it had never beaten and they hired Wood, hoping he could do the same thing
for them.
Did he ever. Brownwood started beating Breckinridge every year and winning
state titles almost every year. The Buckaroos still have some good teams, but
they are in Class 3A now and happy they don't play the Class 4A Lions now,
even with Wood long retired.
Pardon me for drifting back so far, but I grew up in West Texas when it had
the best football played, and teams like Abilene and Breckinridge got
everyone's attention before giving way to Gordon Wood and his powerhouse Br
ownwood teams.
* * * *
So far, eight members of  Dave Campbell's Texas Football magazine's 24-man
Super Team have committed to colleges, and the Longhorns have six of them.
Benson is the only high school player ever to grace the cover of the state's
top football magazine and he is joined on the Super Team by fellow UT
commitments Frenship QB Kendal Briles, San Antonio Holmes CB Cedric Griffin,
and OLs Jonathan Scott of Dallas Carter, Terrance Young of Longview and Abe
Robinson of Jersey Village.
The other Super Team  players who have committed are Madisonville RB David
Underwood, who says he will sign with Michigan, and Lancaster WR Armon
Dorrough, who has given his pledge to Texas Tech.
Briles threw three touchdown passes and ran for a fourth score to lead
Frenship to a 42-6 victory over Fort Worth Wyatt in the Class 4A regional
finals Saturday.
Briles, who led Stephenville to the Class 4A state title last year, is
threatening to do the same thing at Frenship. He needs just two more
victories to accomplish that rare and possibly unprecedented feat.
If UT has a shaky commitment, it would be Briles. He was recruited by Texas
as an athlete, probably a safety, and he says he still thinks about going
somewhere like Nebraska to get a shot at playing QB.
* * * *
There is always a chance that lightning will strike and the Longhorns will
get a commitment from some blue chipper from out of the blue.
If it happens, it probably will be DT Marquise Hill, 6-7, 300, 5.0, of New
Orleans De La Salle.
Michigan has a big lead over LSU, but he says he probably will take a trip to
Texas just to be sure.
He's a long, long shot, but if he does take the trip to Texas, it could
happen. Brown and his staff don't miss on many guys who take official visits.
The 56-visit limit rule isn't one that UT coaches even consider. They
normally bring in about 32 kids, offer about 28 of them and sign about 25 of
them.
* * * *
Look for all of the UT commitments except DE Eric Hall of Tennessee, who has
already visited, and possibly Benson and Briles, who might be playing for
repeat state championships that weekend, to take their official visits to
Texas the Dec. 15 weekend to attend the Texas football banquet. Most of the
other players Texas is recruiting also will take their visits that weekend.

The True Orange Fax/E-Mail
Deal Is a Great Christmas Gift
I'll Have Frequent Reports on Recruiting And Practice Throughout the Year !
Get Instant Updates for Pennies a Day !
Save As An E-Mail Subscriber !
The True Orange Fax/E-Mail Service is the way to keep up with Longhorn
football and Longhorn recruiting ) instantly. Follow Mack Brown and the
Longhorns with frequent fax updates. There are at least 99 timely faxes a
year, primarily about football and football recruiting.  To  subscribe, send
your check to True Orange, Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755, and copy or clip
the coupon below and fill in the blanks. If you want it mailed, or by E-Mail,
just include the right numbers.

o I'm enclosing $99 for the 99-fax package for the next year
o I'm enclosing $130 (a $14 saving) to renew my subscription to True Orange
and to subscribe to the 99 faxes.
o I'm enclosing $79 for the 99-fax package for the next year by E-Mail (a $20
saving)
o Here's  $110 to renew my subscription to True Orange and to subscribe to
the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $31 saving)
o Here's  $99 to subscribe to True Orange by E-Mail and to subscribe to the
99 faxes by E-Mail (a $42 saving)

Name

Fax No.
(or E-Mail or mailing address)


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 07:40 PM -----

	JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	03/02/2001 04:53 PM

		 To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments-re:DWR Creditworthiness/Letter-re:Direct Access

 <<X22350.DOC>>  <<BILASALT.DOC>>

 - X22350.DOC
 - BILASALT.DOC


El Tiempo around 6 tonight?

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture -- Houston
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


If J. Franco wins, you win $2425
If he loses, you lose $75


Yes.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Melodick, Kim
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:26 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	information requested
Sensitivity:	Confidential

Don Baughman contacted me late last week to request information on who of his employees have current employment agreements.  He states that he has responsiblity for Midwest Realtime, SE Realtime and the schedulers in those regions.   Seems like a logical request given the direct reports are correct. Are you comfortable with me providing this information?


T.J. can I get setup with Enron Online.  UserID etc...

Thanks!!!!


let me know if 3:30 works for you guys; we can meet in 3801a (my office).

thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Musch, Susan
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RMT

Sara,

When you like to meet on RMT today?  My morning is booked up, but the afternoon is pretty open.

Best regards,
Susan


Attention
     Cuiab? - Brazil
    The Phone numbers for Pantanal Energia
           and Gasocidente changed.

     From September 11, call:
   55-65-614-2200

 The old Number 55-65-668-4000 is still going
   to be operational until October 2nd.


Any thoughts?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/06/2001 10:39 AM -----

	"Michael Kirby" <mlk@pkns.com>
	05/04/2001 06:00 PM

		 To: <Richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: <Gfergus@brobeck.com>, <Rgibbs@gibbs-.com>, "David Noonan" <djn@pkns.com>
		 Subject: Hendricks

The complaint,albeit brief, filed May 1 in San Diego Superior Court by
Strategy Integration, Inc versus Michael Aguirre and the other Hendricks
plaintiffs' attorneys is quite extraordinary in its disclosure. A hard copy
is being faxed. The expert firm alleges they were "retained...to explain,
research, and investigate potential claims of gaming and collusion by energy
providers who supply electricity to the California Energy Market ...[and]
...retained to perform utility and energy consulting services." After
alleging that the Hendricks attorneys "refused to pay Plaintiffs' first
billing"  it is alleged that"defendants' refusal may have resulted from the
conclusions Plaintiff drew in its analysis." We should consider if there is
there a way to get this filing to Senator Dunn's office or a more friendly
Senator  without identifying us as the source,.They can see what some expert
in the field  hired by the plaintiffs'  class action lawyers apparently
concluded on their own about the claims of gaming and collusion. I suspect
that  Sen Dunn has no interest but some Republican Senator might have some
use for it. It could  have some value if the hearings go forward. This is not
urgent timewise but I wanted to bring it to your attention.

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney
work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the Systems Administrator at admin@pkns.com and immediately delete this
message from your system.


> Ain't this the truth?!
>
> Prison vs. Work
>
> Just in case you ever got the two mixed up.
> This should make things a bit more clear . . .
>
>
> IN PRISON... you spend the majority of your time in an 8X10 cell.
> AT WORK... you spend the majority of your time in a 6X8 cubicle.
>
> IN PRISON... you get three meals a day.
> AT WORK... you only get a break for one meal and you have to pay for it.
>
> IN PRISON... you get time off for good behavior.
> AT WORK... you get rewarded for good behavior with more work.
>
> IN PRISON... the guard locks and unlocks all the doors for you.
> AT WORK... you must carry around a security card and open all the doors
> for
> yourself.
>
> IN PRISON... you can watch TV and play games.
> AT WORK... you get fired for watching TV and playing games.
>
> IN PRISON... you get your own toilet.
> AT WORK... you have to share with some idiot who pees on the seat.
>
> IN PRISON...they allow your family and friends to visit.
> AT WORK... you can't even speak to your family.
>
> IN PRISON... all expenses are paid by the taxpayers with no work
> required.
> AT WORK... you get to pay all the expenses to go to work and then they
> deduct taxes from your salary to pay for
> prisoners.
>
> IN PRISON... you spend most of your life looking through bars from
> inside
> wanting to get out.
> AT WORK... you spend most of your time wanting to get out and go inside
> bars.
>
> IN PRISON... you must deal with sadistic wardens.
> AT WORK... they are called managers
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2000
03:52 PM ---------------------------

Bob Withers <rww@KCSEnergy.com> on 03/29/2000 03:54:45 PM
To: "Susan Trevino (E-mail)" <Susan.D.Trevino@enron.com>
cc: "Taylor Vance (E-mail)" <vtaylor2@enron.com>, Stretch Brennan
<djb@kcsenergy.com>, Knox Westmoreland <rkw@KCSEnergy.com>, Kevin McLarney
<kmm@kcsenergy.com>
Subject: Josey Ranch Est. -- Apr. 2000

 This is the estimated Josey Ranch nomination for the month of April
2000.  The HPL nomination volume to be effective 4/1/2000 is:

    11,100 MMBtu/day for KCS Resources
      1,900 MMBtu/day for TEXACO
    13,000 MMBtu/day Total (assumed Btu factor of 1.075
@ 14.65 dry)

If you need additional information, KCS' field contact is Stretch Brennan in
Victoria: 512 / 576 - 1005.

Bob Withers <*))>><
KCS Energy, 5555 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX  77056
voice mail/page 713-964-9434


Folks,
I'm starting to go through withdrawals from not seeing all of you, from lack of stimulating conversation, and of course good food and drink.  So please check with your better half and let me know if you can make our next scheduled EDF meeting.

Hope to see you soon,

Craig


-----Original Message-----
From: Enron General Announcements
Sent: Thu 1/31/2002 5:14 PM
To: DL-GA-all_domestic; DL-GA-all_NETCO
Cc:
Subject: Assistance for Former Employees

Many of you have friends who are no longer with the company, so we wanted to provide you an overview of continuing efforts to assist Enron's former employees.

CAREER SERVICES
Last December Enron established a website to assist former employees identify jobs in Houston and throughout the United States.  Only former Enron employees and potential employers can access the site, <http://careerservices.enron.com/>

On this site, former employees can:
        ? Post their resumes for approved employers to view
        ? View job postings
        ? Receive updates and information on career and community services available to them
As of January 25, 2002:
        ? More than 1,300 companies had been approved to view resumes
        ? Company recruiters had logged on more than 3,500 times to search for candidates
        ? More than 600 jobs had been posted on the site

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
The Greater Houston Community Foundation
The Greater Houston Community Foundation (GHCF), in collaboration with the United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast, the Houston Area Urban League, Crisis Intervention of Houston, and Career and Recovery Resources, have established a fund to provide dedicated support for former Enron employees.  GHCF offers former employees counseling services and helps them work with mortgage companies, landlords and utilities to defer monthly bills while they are out of work.   If you are interested in making a tax-deductible donation to the GHCF, please call 713-268-6458 or mail donations to GHCF at 4550 Post Oak Place, Suite 317, Houston, TX  77027.  Checks should be made payable to Greater Houston Community Foundation and designated for the Enron Employee Transition Fund.  To receive assistance, former employees can call 713-533-4598, or outside Houston, 1-800-493-4598.  Lines are open 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Enron Ex-Employee Relief Fund Account
A former employee has established the Enron Ex-Employee Relief Fund Account at the Humble Community Bank.  Visit the website at <<http://www.eerfa.com>> for more information or to make a donation.  Former employees can submit grant requests to eerfarequest@surfmk.com.

MDPC Transitional Assistance Program
Memorial Drive Presbyterian Church has created a Transitional Assistance Program open to both members and non-members who need assistance re-entering the workforce.  Right Management Consultants offers a series of two-day workshops for former employees on topics such as Career Assessment and Evaluation, Job Search Communication and Managing in a Time of Change.  Requests for limited and discretionary short-term financial assistance will be accepted from those who have participated in this program.  MDPC will offer a holistic approach to re-entering the workforce including family counseling and stress management. For more information, contact Memorial Drive Presbyterian Church at 713-953-2550, ext 180.


Hello everyone.  It is time for the Spring recruiting season to begin and
select the candidates we would like to have on our pre-select list. My
coordinator  will be handing out the resume books this morning. Please call
Alyse at extension 57339 with your EB locations so we can be sure to get the
resume books to you. Please email me your top 10 picks by noon, Friday,
January 26th.  Thank you for your continued support and I look forward to
working with you all this season.

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
Associate / Analyst Program

amh


Charlie,

Thanx.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  V Charles Weldon                           09/27/2000 12:22 PM

To: christopher.long@enron.com
cc: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Nymex

Chris,

Here is the analysis you requested.    Let me know if I can be of any further
assistance.

Charlie Weldon


okay - cool.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/09/2001 11:40 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: NCPA deal #541645

Thanks!  Stewart had already called me this morning about this deal and had
someone in risk change the other two legs.

   Kate Symes                03/09/2001 01:29 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NCPA deal #541645

It looks like only leg 4 had firm energy - I changed that to CAISO. Legs 2
and 3 already had CAISO energy, and leg 1 is killed. Is that okay?

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/09/2001 07:01 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: NCPA deal #541645

These two legs are entered with NP-15 delivery points with firm energy.  Let
me know if this is correct.

Thanks!


A  presentation on credit risk modeling.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000
09:03 AM ---------------------------

"Gil, Alla" <alla.gil@ssmb.com> on 06/19/2000 01:21:30 PM
To: "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: "Kulick, Adam" <adam.kulick@ssmb.com>
Subject: RE: Your presentation

Vince,

I'm very happy you found the presentation useful.
I'm working very closely with Adam Kulick who you probably know.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if you have any difficulty
opening the file.

Best regards,

Alla

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 1:43 PM
To: Gil, Alla
Cc: Vince J Kaminski
Subject: Your presentation

Alla,

I enjoyed your presentation at Risk2000 last week.
I would appreciate an electronic copy of the documentation.

Vince Kaminski

Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director - Research
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002-7361

Phone:    (713) 853 3848
Fax  :      (713) 646 2503
E-mail: vkamins@enron.com

 - RiskCongress.ppt


Hello! Kathy, Bob, Sam & Zachary has just sent you a greeting card from
Bluemountain.com.

You can pick up your personal message here:

http://www3.bluemountain.com/cards/box4529n/gcxe5zspi3tzhz.htm

Your card will be available for the next 90 days
This service is 100% FREE! :) Have a good day and have fun!

________________________________________________________________________
Accessing your card indicates agreement with Blue Mountain's Website Rules:
http://www.bluemountain.com/home/WebsiteRules.html

Send FREE Blue Mountain greeting cards to friends and family
http://www.bluemountain.com