Could be a soon as the next week or two.  We'll make sure that you're up to date on the latest.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Jeff
Sent: Mon 10/22/2001 9:12 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:
Subject: RE: California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA Suspension Date Back to July 1

Jeff,

In what time frame are these decisions looking at being made?  keep me posted on the July 1st roll back since it would have the biggest implications for EWS/EES existing positions.

Thank you,
Jeff Richter

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:   Friday, October 19, 2001 5:02 PM
To:     Dasovich, Jeff; Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Calger, Christopher F.; Tycholiz, Barry; Richter, Jeff; Belden, Tim; Comnes, Alan; Swain, Steve; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Hughes, Evan; Herod, Brenda F.; Parquet, David; Frazier, Lamar; Denne, Karen; O'Neil, Murray P.; Huddleson, Diann

Cc:     Alamo, Joseph
Subject:        California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA Suspension Date Back to July 1

The state treasurer sent a letter this afternoon to Loretta Lynch.
The treasurer claims in the letter that, by extending DA  through Sept. 20th, the PUC could have shifted more than $8 billion to small customers.
He urges Lynch to immediately roll back the date to July 1.
We have started working with large customers to refute the letter.
If you would like a copy of the letter, please send your fax number to Joseph Alamo.

Best,
Jeff


Metropolitan Water District indicated to Holden this morning that they were unwilling to take delivery of January contracts due to the fact that the market price is below the contract price.

I show they are obligated to receive 50 MW LLH Mead 230 @ $24, and 50 MW LLH Mead 230 @ $22.5.

The manager there is John Lambec   213.217.7387

Can you advise us how to proceed, does this create a default situation?


Jeff asked that I send this to you.  THIS MUST BE FILED BY FRIDAY.  We're trying to get as many parties as possible to join with us. Love to have you with us.

Here is the first draft.


Please find attached the response by Tozzini's firm.

-----Original Message-----
From: MEG - Maria Elisa Gualandi Verri [mailto:MEG@tozzini.com.br]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 11:39 AM
To: Roark, Donnie
Cc: Young, Randy (Enron); CEB@tozzini.com.br; jenp@tozzini.com.br;
pseraphim@tozzini.com.br; syllas@tozzini.com.br; Brazzil, Mark
(Beijing); Weiland, William
Subject: Brazil - Project 2000

March 22, 2000.

Mr. Donnie Roark, esq.
Vinson & Elkins
cc: Mr. Randy Young (Enron South America)
      Mr. William H. Weiland (Vinson & Elkins)
      Mr. Mark Brazzil (Vinson & Elkins)

Dear Mr. Roark,

Please make reference to your email of March 21, to which were attached
descriptions of some regulations governing certain of Enron's Brazilian
projects, for our revision.

As agreed in  our telephone conversation of yesterday, we limited our
revision to the descriptions of "Brazil - Strategic Overview of Natural Gas
Distribution"; "CEG/RIOG?S";  "GASPART" and  "ELEKTRO".

The above descriptions are attached hereto, marked to show our suggestions.

Please do not hesitate to contact us should you need any clarification.

Best regards,

Maria Elisa Gualandi Verri
Tozzini Freire Teixeira e Silva Advogados
Tel: 55-11-232 2100
Fax: 55-11-232 3100
e-mail: meg@tozzini.com.br

 - Overview.doc
 - Riogas.doc
 - Elektro.doc
 - Gaspart.doc


Start Date: 1/27/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Return Receipt

    Your      NDA - Carr Futures, Inc.
    document
    :

    was       Mark Thomas/London/ICF
    received
    by:

    at:       02/22/2001 04:54:03 PM EST


Darrell and Jerry are the analyst report from Matt and the reason for the outage requests at Station 4 for next week.

Thanks,
Rick Smith
Transwestern Pipeline Company
505-260-4005

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Francis, Matt
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:49 AM
To:	Gallup-Sta4, Team; Gallup, Team
Cc:	Johnson, Randy; Hendricks, Jonny; Smith, Rick; Morse, Ronnie
Subject:	402 & 403 Engine analysis

Both units have items that probably need to be looked at fairly quick.

I have also faxed a copy of the full report to Station 4 and Ronnie Morse.

Matt Francis


Attached is the sheet that details staff/functions.  If you have any questions, please feel free to call:

Home:   281-463-4421
Cell:      713-851-5456

Thanks.  JR


STEVE: I very much appreciate your call the day before yesterday and your
asking if I would like to compete to succeed Joe Hillings as head of Enron's
Washington office. Although until that moment I hadn't thought of returning
to Washington except to serve again in national office, I would be pleased
to talk further about this opportunity with you or your recruiter.

In recalling our conversation, I realize that twice you asked if I had any
questions, and if I had been quick to take advantage of your offer, I would
have asked how government relations are handled at Enron. To whom does Joe
Hillings report: to you or to Terry Thorne? You mentioned a woman who
currently has responsibility for government relations in Texas and some
neighboring states but is leaving for another job at Enron; to whom does she
report? Then there is Joe Allen, whom I have known since our days in the
Legislature; doesn't he (also) handle Texas affairs?

I am sorry I didn't ask you all this on Tuesday. Whatever the answers, it's
clear that government relations are  much more central to the work of Enron
than at Compaq, which is why it would be a very exciting place to work.
Thanks again for your call, your courtesy, and your indulgence with this
tardy line of questioning. With best wishes, CHASE.

CHASE UNTERMEYER
Director of Government Affairs
Compaq Computer Corporation
P.O. Box 692000-110706
Houston, Texas 77269-2000
Tel: (281) 518-1093
Fax: (281) 518-1106
chase.untermeyer@compaq.com


Jim:
Your words of encouragement are greatly appreciated.  I've certainly had some
troubles this quarter.  I do appreciate your offer but I don't want to take
away from the amazing year you've had so far.  Maybe you should come trade
this...
John

Jim Schwieger
12/06/2000 05:42 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: For What It's Worth.

Through the year's (Sounds like Im really old) I have learned that the really
great Individuals come down on themselves for circumstances beyond their
control when in fact their performance is far beyond what anyone else could
have done.  I believe you are one of those individuals.  I appreciate what
you have done with EOL and the burden you have had to take on.  This
especially hits home when I see what has happened to you P/L the last 3
months.  You are expected to carry the world without having any NYMEX
liquidity to cover your risk.  I would like to offer to transfer $30 million
out of the Storage Book to the Price Book.  Without you and EOL I could never
have done what I've done.

 Thanks,
 Jim Schwieger


Southern Union for May
2100 83 st
2100 Port Arthur

These are my estimates. The volumes for April at T-ville and Colorado RS are
either spot or April only. Janet does not know about next month yet.
So, 5000 total is a safe assumption.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 08:36 AM -----

	"Chiodi, Maria" <maria.chiodi@csfb.com>
	12/20/2000 07:20 PM

		 To: "'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Skinner, Mark" <mark.skinner@csfb.com>, "Haratunian, Stephen"
<stephen.haratunian@csfb.com>
		 Subject: Equity Forward Confirmation

Sara:

As we discussed this evening, I attach a revised draft based on our
discussions and, aside from the jurisdiction issue, have highlighted what I
think are the open issues in brackets.  I apologize in advance if I left
anything out and look forward to discussing this further with you tomorrow
morning.

Regards,

Maria Chiodi

 <<Fwd001220Trade1Dec 20 Draft.doc>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - Fwd001220Trade1Dec 20 Draft.doc


While working on a business plan, I came across this while researching
competitors.  Is this the type of business you have in mind ?

http://www.omrsystems.com/products/network/index.asp


Please note that there were cuts on 2/11 and 2/12, so there will be slight
changes in the fixed price sale volumes. Call with questions.

Kate
503-464-7486


You were reading my mind.  What is the list of things he owes us?  David F.
and I will call Marvin to report on the status.

Thank you,

Reagan
713.345.3363
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 7:55 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Cc: Pagan, Ozzie; Fairley, David
Subject: Clarksdale

Reagan,

I haven't received an email from David Hunt yet.  I will make the changes you
and I discussed last week, and perhaps we will get David's changes sometime
today.

Kay


request_number:  DS-BPA:375
firstname:  Sarah
lastname:  Westenberg
e-mail:  sawestenberg@bpa.gov
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JCG-01 and )02.
page_numbers:
request_text:  Please disclose and/or produce copies of any and all
communications, from October 16, 2001 to the present, between any BPA
representative and any representative of any other party, concerning any of
the following subjects:

a. The general structure of the Cost Recovery Adjustment Clauses (CRACs)
described in the testimony of the Joint Customers;

b. Any differences between the form of the CRACs described in the testimony
of the Joint Customers and the CRACs contained in BPA's Amended Proposal, or
those contained in BPA's Supplemental Proposal;

c. The detailed mechanics of implementing the CRACs described in the
testimony of the Joint Customers;

d. Revenue effects of the CRACs described in the testimony of the Joint
Customers, any modifications; or

e. Any aspect of the Partial Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and the
Parties' Proposal attached thereto.

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

response_text:  There are no communications that fit the description since
October 16, 2001 has not occurred.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  53.180.74.220
3.  Remote IP Address:  53.180.74.220
4.  Form URL:
http://www.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT; BPA 4.01
SP2; BPA 5.01 SP1)


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 08/20/2000
05:39 PM ---------------------------

"Lucy Gonzalez" <stagecoachmama@hotmail.com> on 08/15/2000 02:32:57 PM
To: pallen@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Daily Duties

      Phillip,
           We have been working on different apartments today and having to
listen to different, people about what Mary is saying should i be worried?
ants seem to be invading my apartment.You got my other fax's Wade is working
on the bulletin board that I need up so that I can let tenants know about
what is going on.Gave #25 a notice about having to many people staying in
that apt and that problem has been resolved.Also I have a tenant in #29 that
is complaining about #28 using fowl language.I sent #28 a lease violation we
will see how that goes
                                                  call you tomorrow
                                           Thanx Lucy
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


FYI.  Jan, I know Shelley's out; I left her a voice mail.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/21/2000
10:53 AM ---------------------------

Susan Scott
11/21/2000 10:42 AM
To: Stan Horton/Houston/Eott@Eott, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON,
Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ramona
Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerry Medeles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Order on TW Options

I just received a call from Nancy Bagot informing me that FERC has issued a
draft order suspending our proposed Transport Options tariff sheets until May
1, 2001 and accepting them subject to the outcome of a technical conference.
The technical conference is to take place within 120 days of the order and
will address issues raised in protests.
I should be receiving a copy of the draft order soon.  Please call or e-mail
me if you have questions.


done.

Aimee Lannou   03/02/2001 04:43 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: meter 1031 Baytown Exxon

Daren - the valve for meter 1031 was not shut off in time on 3/1.  It flowed
about 1.200.  Could you please extend the deal for one day (deal 589188) ?
Thanks.

al


Audrey,

Here is a brief personal work history.  I've been in the utility industry pretty much since 1988.  I started trading for Portland General Electric in 1995.  I've been a trader for Enron for the last 4 years.  I run Enron's short-term Northwest book.  I have market-making responsibility for the cash, balance, and prompt months for the Mid-Columbia and COB specifically, although I am responsible for the entire Northwest.  I also trade Palo Verde, SP15, and NP15.

I have recently talked with a couple of other trading outfits out west and generally the structure looks something like this:

1.  150 K Base Salary
2.  250 to 300 K Signing Bonus
3.  Various bonus structures, generally with a minimum guaranteed equal to the base salary.

Quite frankly a move to the east coast is not very appealing.  The compensation package would have to be very attractive for me to seriously consider a move to that area.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks,

Sean Crandall


Sara
Further to this can we look at the WTI-Brent spread trade and how this is
handled.
i.e.
Who trades this?
What book does it sit in?
What legal entity is that book?

Thanks
Trena
---------------------- Forwarded by Trena McFarland/NA/Enron on 08/02/2001
08:55 ---------------------------

Darren Maloney
06/02/2001 17:49
To: Trena McFarland/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nigel Majury/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Softs//Remaining Legal Questions

Bob and Sara,

I think the additional questions that need to be addressed are as follows.
Once we have your input on these issues,
our only remaining legal issues will revolve around (1) setting up NY
brokerage, (2) actually setting up the different
legal entities and related service agreements, (3) EOL product descriptions
and (4) revisions to template ISDA agreements.

Outstanding Issues:
1.  Are personnel involved in a regulated brokerage business able to market
OTC derivative products to clients without
     regulatory conflict?  (Both US and UK)
2.  Are there any special consideration s in terms of corporate organization
or operations that we must use in order not to
     create conflict stemming from our OTC business as a regulated exchange
member (both UK and US)?
3.  To avoid regulatory burdens on other aspects of Enron and the Softs
business, in what corporate entity will the NY
      clearing business reside?
4.  For those counterparties looking to transact with ENA as principal, can
we (1) provide parent guarantees for selected
     counterparties or (2) can we use ENA to take a trade via a back-to-back
with ENA Softs, for example?
5.  In regards to service agreements, is there a threshold of activity that
establishes a tax or regulatory presence over and
     above any service agreement (ie- compromises the organizational
structure)?
6.  How would a Chinese Wall be structured between the brokerage and OTC
businessses?  General market information
      will likely need to be shared and some sharing between client and
non-EOL broker will occur.  Please lay out the
      concept and structure behind this mechanism so that we can better
understand this.

Please add comments as this is a checklist and likely not comprehensive.

Regards,
Darren
36661


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
03:38 PM ---------------------------
From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/12/2001 02:44 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Parent - Subsidary Model

Hi,

I don't know if you have the attached document from Ben Parsons.

As we discussed earlier, Anita put me on your calendar for next Tuesday at 2
pm to discuss the Duffie project.  I hope that is ok.

Thanks,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Valnek, Tomas
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Fiala, Markus; Seyfried, Bryan; Salmon, Scott; Kirkpatrick, Eric;
Mumford, Mike; Fontaine, Jean-Sebastien; Brooks, Simon; Price, Nigel;
Diprose, Robert; Rezaeian, Reza; Gordon, Mike; Lee, Derek; Hershkovitz, Ilan;
Golden, Sally; Stephan, Nicholas; Albanis, George; Shanbhogue, Vasant; Mack,
Iris
Cc: Parsons, Ben
Subject: Parent - Subsidary Model

Attached is a description of the parent-subsidiary model that Ben and I have
been working on over the last few weeks.

Comments welcome!

TV


Ben the attached file contains the answers to the questions listed in your
e-mail for Lincoln.

Gus

	Benjamin Rogers@ECT
	10/20/2000 08:30 AM

		 To: Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Questions regarding PSD permit for Lincoln

Forgot to include these questions.  Thanks for the call this morning, your
help is very much appreciated.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
08:29 AM ---------------------------

Don Miller
10/20/2000 08:29 AM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Questions regarding PSD permit for Lincoln

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 08:28 AM
---------------------------

mhhurtado@duke-energy.com on 10/18/2000 02:51:20 PM
To: don.miller@enron.com
cc: japearson@duke-energy.com, jparker@mayerbrown.com, jusow@mayerbrown.com
Subject: Questions regarding PSD permit for Lincoln

Don,

As a result of our review of the information and documents on Lincoln we
are requesting additional documents which are not in the data room.

1.   Relating to the plant's PSD:

     The Mostardi & Platt emissions test protocol for the May 2000
     emissions test
      A report to Illlinois EPA containing the emission test data
     Continuous Emission Monitoring (" CEM") Data ( all data
     developed since start-up)
     Any reports to IEPA required under the permit pertaining to
     exceedances, or
     start-up, breakdown & malfunction ( we have internal memos indicating
     that there
     was a breakdown at # 7 on July 5,2000)

2. Also, we don't have any permits for wastewater discharge. We have been
told that there is no wastewater discharged except
sewage/office wastewater which is going to a septic field. But we have no
verification of this at this point.

Thank you for your attention to these items.

Mario H. Hurtado
Duke Energy North America


Attached please find the interview schedule, resume, and evaluation form for
Iris Mack.  Iris will be interviewing on December 28, 2000.  Please contact
me with any comments or concerns.

Thank you,
Cheryl Arguijo
EWS Staffing
713-345-4016


Here is a confirmation that I have played around with and added some appropriate wordng like I would add if I were doing a deal that involved 10 percent or 20 percent swing, differernt  pricing, etc.

I don't think I have ever had a deal where we had different pricing involving the swing language, so I made one up for you.  Let me know if this helps.


EMERGENCY OUTAGE
N O T I F I C A T I O N
			INFORMATION SYSTEMS & SERVICES

To:

Who this affects:		All Enron Energy Services Employees

		All Enron Energy Services Employees using the Siebel Customer Management
System

Date of Outage:

Outage Information:

Purpose:

		Friday, September 8, 2000,  7:00 PM to 11:00 PM  CST

		The Siebel CMS system will be completely unavailable during the outage period.

		To perform necessary maintenance.
Work Around:		None

		Thank you for your cooperation!

If you have questions about the above notification, please call the
EES Tech Support Call Center at (713) 853-9797 or Toll Free at (888) 853-9797


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041813.txt


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Jeff Skilling Visit

Date:		11/30/2000
Time:		10:30 AM - 11:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football210.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Anna Kournikova Exclusive Fantasy Offer! Save 10% on Anna's 2002 Calendar! Yes 12 months of Anna!  Simply enter the coupon code FNTSYCAL in step 5 of the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires 11/30/01.

http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/135/sffer1120tr.cgi

Attention Fantasy Fans!  Subscribe to The Sporting News now and get 4 FREE issues! Hurry!

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1120e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/135/sffer1120tr.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/224/sffer1120sn.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1120c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1120v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="415, 1, 498, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/1/sffer1120s.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="498, 1, 581, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/12/sffer1120w.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="581, 1, 664, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1120t.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

Standings, Summary

East Division

Team	W	L	T	Pct	Back	Strk	Div	Wks	PF	Back	PA

McKay Neal	8	3	0	0.727	0.0	L1	8-3-0	4.0	764.0	53.0	567.0

Eric Bass	8	3	0	0.727	0.0	W3	8-3-0	1.0	625.0	192.0	506.0

Martin Cuilla	7	4	0	0.636	1.0	L3	7-4-0	3.0	817.0	0.0	784.0

Hunter Shively	4	7	0	0.364	4.0	W3	4-7-0	0.0	784.0	33.0	817.0

FIBSABs	3	8	0	0.273	5.0	W1	3-8-0	0.0	567.0	250.0	764.0

Rocks	3	8	0	0.273	5.0	L3	3-8-0	0.0	506.0	311.0	625.0

West Division

Team	W	L	T	Pct	Back	Strk!
</!
TD>Div	Wks	PF	Back	PA

Fear	9	2	0	0.818	0.0	W3	9-2-0	0.0	616.0	201.0	424.0

The Klap	8	3	0	0.727	1.0	W4	8-3-0	2.0	749.0	68.0	640.0

Tori Kuykendall	7	4	0	0.636	2.0	W1	7-4-0	0.0	599.0	218.0	537.0

Baja	4	7	0	0.364	5.0	L1	4-7-0	0.0	537.0	280.0	599.0

Matt Lenhart	3	8	0	0.273	6.0	L4	3-8-0	1.0	640.0	177.0	749.0

Top Dogs	2	9	0	0.182	7.0	L3	2-9-0	0.0	424.0	393.0	616.0

Statistics, Scoring

Eric Bass Actives

Player	Pos	Scoring	Score

Grbac, Elvis	QB	259 PaYd (12 Pts), 1 PaTD (3) (3 Pts)	15.0

Allen, James	RB	107 RuYd (10 Pts)	10.0

Smith, Robert	RB	 	0.0

Harrison, Marvin	WR	128 ReYd (12 Pts), 1 ReTD (15) (6 Pts)	18.0

Hayes, Donald	WR	29 ReYd (2 Pts)	2.0

Horn, Joe	WR	97 ReYd (9 Pts)	9.0

Nedney, Joe	K	1 FG (49) (4 Pts), 3 XP (3 Pts)	7.0

Ravens	DT	4 SACK (4 Pts)	4.0

TOTALS	 	 	65.0

Eric Bass Reserves

Player	Pos	ST	Scoring	Score

Anders, Kimble	RB	RS	 	0.0

Davis, Terrell	RB	RS	 	0.0

Lions	DT	RS	1 DTD (8) (6 Pts), 2 SACK (2 Pts), 2 DFR (4 Pts)	12.0

McNabb, Donovan	QB	RS	92 PaYd (4 Pts), 39 RuYd (3 Pts)	7.0

Morris, Sylvester	WR	RS	 	0.0

Robinson, Marcus	WR	RS	 	0.0

TOTALS	 	 	 	19.0

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Freddie Jones, TE SD - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
San Diego Head Coach Mike Riley said Monday that he is optimistic Jones will be able to play Sunday. He has been sidelined by an ankle injury.

Wade Richey, K SD - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Richey is likely to lose the starting placekicking job with the Chargers if they sign Steve Christie to a contract. San Diego would shift Richey to kickoffs only, after he missed two short field goals Sunday to drop to 21-for-30 on the se!
as!
on. In that case, you should drop Richey from your roster.

Steve Christie, K BUF - Hunter Shively Updated 11/27/01
The Chargers are expected to sign Christie on Tuesday provided he passes a physical, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune. He would handle the field-goal chores for the remainder of the season, with Wade Richey shifting to kickoffs. If you're a Richey owner and need a kicker, Christie might be worth a pickup based on past history, but don't expect him to be one of the better kickers in the league even if he does get the starting job.

Mark Brunell, QB JAC - Top Dogs Upda!
te!
d 11/27/01

Brunell is questionable for Monday's game against Green Bay, the third straight week his status has been in question due to continued pain in his quadriceps muscle. He will be limited again in practice, and it's probably a good idea to keep him on reserve for Week 12 in your league.

Terrell Davis, RB DEN - Eric Bass Updated 11/27/01
Davis should be able to return from arthroscopic knee surgery in time for Sunday's game against Miami. He will practice this week before a final decision is made, but we're skeptical the Broncos won't have him split carries with Mike Anderson, limiting both players' Fantasy values.

Keith Poole, WR DEN - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Poole has bruised ribs that will likely keep him on the sidelines for Sunday's game against Miami. If he can't play, Kevin Kaspar would start in his place, and the Denver passing game would further suffer.

Rod Smith, WR DEN - Baja Updated 11/27/01
Smith now has two sprained ankles, and is questionable for Sunday's game against Miami. If he can't play, then the Broncos might have to start Kevin Kaspar and Chris Cole at wideout, depending on Keith Poole's recovery from a rib injury.

James Jackson, RB CLE - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Jackson's ankle remains sore, and he will be re-evaluated Wednesday to determine his status for Sunday's game against Tennessee. Benjamin Gay and Jamel White would continue to split carries if Jackson can't go.

Neil Rackers, K CIN - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Bengals Head Coach Dick LeBeau said Monday he has not yet made a decision on the status of Rackers, who missed two field-goal chances Sunday. He is 9-for-18 in field goals this season, and Jaret Holmes has been on the practice squad since Nov. 1. Rack!
er!
s will likely retain the job for Sunday's game against Tampa Bay, but he's a very risky Fantasy starter based on his struggles.

Akili Smith, QB CIN - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Bengals Head Coach Dick LeBeau said Monday that Smith might be promoted to No. 2 quarterback, according to The Cincinnati Enquirer. "If that's what they're going to do, maybe the Bengals need to get rid of me," Smith said, citing a desire to be traded if he's used in a mop-up role. He's not a recommended Fantasy choice, although it's important to note that he's now likely next in line if Jon Kitna gets hurt.

Terry Allen
, RB BAL - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Allen, who remains out with a broken hand, could return to the lineup on Dec. 16. With the Ravens losing Jason Brookins to an injury, don't be surprised if Allen takes back the starting job once healthy. Hold onto him if you have the room on your reserve list or play in a deeper league.

Moe Williams, RB BAL - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Williams becomes the Ravens' featured back after the injury to Jason Brookins. If you play in a deeper league or are desperate for a running back, consider picking up Williams, although you shouldn't expect him to post great stats unless the matchup is very favorable.

Jason Brookins, RB BAL - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Results of X-rays on Brookins' foot revealed a fracture of a bone in his small toe, which will sideline him for at least four weeks and possibly the rest of the season. Moe Williams becomes the Ravens' starting running back, and might be worth adding to your roster in a deeper league.

Wayne Chrebet, WR NYJ - Fear Updated 11/27/01
Chrebret did not practice Monday because of a shoulder injury. However, The New York Newsday reports that he is expected to play in Sunday's game.

Jake Arians, K BUF - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Arians has been released by the Bills. Buffalo has signed Shayne Graham to replace him.

Edgerrin James, RB IND - Martin Cuilla Updated 11/27/01
Colts coach Jim Mora said James' surgery to repair a torn ligament in his left knee was successful Saturday in Miami.  Mora said he received the news from orthopedic surgeon Dr. Arthur Rettig, a team physician. "I spoke with him Saturday and he told me it went very well," Mora said. James, the two-time NFL rushing champion, injured the knee when he was tackled awkward!
ly!
 late in a game at Kansas City on Oct. 25. He was placed on injured reserve last week. James' rehabilitation is expected to take seven months. He is not expected to take part in either of the Colts offseason minicamps. Team president Bill Polian has not said whether James will be ready for the start of training camp.

Terry Glenn, WR NE - Tori Kuykendall Updated 11/27/01
Glenn could be put on injured reserve if he doesn't recover from a hamstring injury soon. That would mean the end of his season, and perhaps the end of his Patriots career. "I haven't reached it yet," coach Bill Belichick said Monday when asked when he would decide if the roster spot would be better spent on someone other than Glenn. "But as each day goes by, it gets a little bit closer." !
  !

Shayne Graham, K SEA - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
The Buffalo Bills signed Graham as their kicker Tuesday, a day after Jake Arians was released following a missed point-after against the Miami Dolphins. Graham had been released by the Seattle Seahawks before the start of the season.

Stephen Alexander, TE WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Alexander, who has been hampered by a ankle injury, returned to action on Sunday. He didn't start, however, and may lose playing time to both Walter Rasby and Zeron Flemister for the rest of the season. Unless you play !
in!
 a deeper league, dropping Alexander is advisable.

Az-Zahir Hakim, WR STL - FIBSABs Updated 11/27/01
Hakim, who is dealing with an ankle injury, played in Monday night's 24-17 loss to Tampa Bay. He had three catches for 29 yards in the game.

Kevan Barlow, RB SF - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Barlow suffered a dislocated shoulder during Sunday's win over Indianapolis. "It's throbbing," Barlow told the Contra Costa Times
. "I couldn't really sleep last night. I had to sleep sitting up. It's hurting." Barlow is listed as doubtful for Sunday's game against Buffalo, so be sure to place him on reserve.

Terrell Owens, WR SF - Martin Cuilla Updated 11/27/01
Owens suffered a sprained right foot on Sunday to go along with his sprained left ankle. X-rays were negative, but Owens' foot was placed in a protective boot as a precaution. He is expected to miss some practice time this week, but he will be in the starting lineup on Sunday when the Niners face Buffalo.

Jeff Thomason, TE PHI - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01</F!
O!
NT>
Thomason suffered a hyperextended knee during Sunday's loss to Washington. He missed practice on Monday, and is status for Week 12 is uncertain at this time. The reserve tight end has very little value as a Fantasy player.

Donald Driver, WR GB - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Driver, who has been inactive for three straight weeks due to a thigh injury, returned to practice on Monday. His status for Week 12 remains unclear, but he's not worth starting on your Fantasy team in any event.

Tyrone Davis, TE GB - Rocks Updated 11/27/01

Davis, who has been out all year due to a hamstring injury, will likely find out what his status with the Packers will be this week. Depending on his health, the team will either activate him, place him on injured reserve or cut him altogehter.

James Stewart, RB DET - Tori Kuykendall Updated 11/27/01
Stewart, who suffered a neck stinger in last Thursday's game against Green Bay, is expected to be available for Week 12. He'll have a tough time posting good Fantasy numbers against Chicago's tough run defense, but the lack of depth at running back in the league makes it tough to bench him.

Charlie Batch, QB DET - Rocks Updated 11/27/01
According to the Detroit Free Press, Batch is expected to start Sunday's game against Chicago despite a groin injury. "This is Charlie's offense," coach Marty Mornhinweg said. "He practiced a little bit today...he was in all weekend getting (the injury) treated...I would expect him close to full speed Wednesday." He'll likely lose snaps to rookie QB Mike McMahon, however, so starting Batch is a risky proposition.

Jackie Harris, TE DAL - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Harris missed last week's game against Denver due to a hamstring injury. The veteran tight end is listed as day to day.

Anthony Thomas, RB CHI - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
According to coach Dick Jaroun, Thomas' status for Week 12 is still uncertain. In fact, the Bears don't expect to know if Thomas, who is dealing with a hamstring injury, will be available until later in the week.

Brad Hoover, RB CAR - Free Agent Updated 11/27/01
Hoover (neck) will likely be held out of practice this week. However, the Panthers are hopeful that he'll be available for Sunday's game against New Orleans.

More Updates

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


Read about Enron's entry into the data storage market.

Also in this issue:
Sizing up EnronOnline's competition
Brazil's new merchant plant
EBS sponsors Sundance

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz February 2, 2001."


[IMAGE]Unsubscribe at bottom
[IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    Click here to download FREE Collapse demo!    [IMAGE]
 remove me                    privacy  policy       You received this e-mail because you downloaded a RealPlayer
, RealJukebox
, or another product from Real.com? and indicated a preference to receive special offers from RealNetworks
, or you subscribed to the Special Offers e-mail category in your account area. If you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the future, click on the "remove me" link above.   RealNetworks, RealPlayer, RealJukebox, Real.com, and RealArcade are trademarks or registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products listed herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


Spoke with Bill Munson and Roger Yang of MRW

Scope of project would be rate forecast for PGE and SCE industrial/commercial
class customers for 24-36 month period providing alternate scenarios for
certain issues - MRW will provide assumptions Friday morning.

Cost - Close of Monday deliverable - $10k
          - Thursday - $7k

FYI - Submitted RCR for $25K

With respect to determination of "Net Short" generation cost - MRW suggested
generation cost be allocated on a cost incurrence basis (no subsidies) and
that we agree as to mix of DRW portfolio and utilize Enron forward curves to
price out

Provided to MRW utility tariff schedules that majority of positions are
under.  Need to determine if we want an individual rate projection, average
rate class projection or benchmark projection (%increase).


Who loves you baby?


Elizabeth,

Just as an FYI, I have spoken with Marty Jo at Entergy-Koch. I tried to explain to her that we are not disagreeing to sign Entergy-Koch's confirm when they are seller, how we would just like for their confirmation to reflect the example confirmation within the EEI agreement. I also mentioned to her that I had sent their confirmation for review to our attorney David Portz and I expressed the changes that needed to be made to their confirmation to their back office. I have attached the EEI agreement just in case. She mentioned at the very being of our conversation that she would like to discuss the issue with you.

Please call with any questions x33031.

Regards,

Kimberly

 http://edms.livelink.enron.com/ena/livelink.exe/8213615/96050496_Base_Contract_10_23_00.pdf?func=doc.Fetch&nodeid=8213615


Probably can handle monday pm.  Will get with you wednesday but feel free to schedule anything after 12:00.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


It is an hour and a half west of Memphis.  No where.  You can smell the meat
processing plant.  Hey, you would probably like that!

Steve Montovano
03/06/2001 02:04 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: NJR LOI

Glenn Lockwood, SVP & CFO, NJ Resources Corporation, 1415 Wyckoff Road, Wall
NJ 07719.

Where in the hell is Clarksdale Mississippi? And don't just tell me in
Mississippi!

Kay Mann
03/06/2001 09:16 AM
To: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: NJR LOI

Great trip back.  I spent yesterday in Clarksdale Mississippi.  Don't make a
point of spending your vacation there!

Can you email me Glenn's info so I can send him the hard copy?

I enjoyed our time together, and look forward to more adventures.

Kay

Steve Montovano
03/05/2001 08:22 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NJR LOI

Kay - I hope travel back to iah was uneventful.  Please email me a final copy
of the LOI that was eventualy signed by NJR.  Thank you! Steve


> The tragedy of the flooding brought on by Tropical Storm Allison has
> touched Enron in a very personal way.  Chad Garren, a summer intern in
> the Global Technology Group died Friday night when his vehicle was
> overcome by floodwaters in the Heights area.  Our condolences go out
> to Chad's family and co-workers.  Chad was a Senior MIS major at Texas
> A&M University, and was from Weatherford, Texas.  Enron Community
> Relations and Aggies@Enron are working with Chad's family to create a
> Scholarship Fund in his memory.  Funeral services are tentatively
> scheduled for Wednesday morning in Weatherford.  Additional details on
> the Scholarship Fund and funeral services will be communicated as soon
> as they are available.
>
> We have received several questions related to volunteer opportunities
> in the aftermath of the flooding.   Community Relations is working
> with the Red Cross and several area agencies to determine where our
> resources can best be applied.  If you are interested in volunteering
> please email community-relations@enron.com.
>
>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dr. Bob Sports" <football@drbobsports.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Dr+2E+20Bob+20Sports+22+20+3Cfootball+40drbobsports+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:21 AM
To:	Wilson, Derek
Subject:	College Football Best Bets

Dear Member:

I have 6 Best Bets this week in College football after going 2-1 last week (I counted
South Carolina as a loss since 75% of the people surveyed took a loss on that game). The
Strong Opinions were 0-4 last week, but remember, I DO NOT BET THE STRONG OPINIONS.
Strong Opinions have won more than they have lost over the years (about 54% to 55%), but
play them at your own risk (I don't want to here about if they lose. Or win, for that
matter). There are 10 Strong Opinions this week, listed below the Best Bets. Good luck on
the 6 Best Bets this week.

3 Star Selection
IOWA (-14.0) 38 Miami Ohio 14
After suffering through a 7-27 record the last 3 seasons, the Hawkeyes will be in the
hunt for a bowl bid this year. Iowa returns 16 starters from a team that was hit hard by
injuries last season and they are eager to flex their muscles on lesser teams, as they
did last week in beating Kent State 51-0. Miami-Ohio is certainly a tougher test than
Kent, but the Hawkeyes should have no trouble disposing of the Redhawks. Iowa has a well
rounded offense that is anchored by a veteran offensive line and that possesses a quality
quarterback in Kyle McCann, a talented running back in Ladell Betts and a game-breaking
receiver in Kahill Hill that is due for a breakout season. Iowa ran for 331 yards at 6.8
yards per rush last week against a Kent State defensive front that I rate the same as
Miami-Ohio's, so I expect another good performance from the Iowa rush attack in this game
while McCann picks apart a sub-par Miami secondary when he needs to. Miami-Ohio possesses
a pretty solid rush attack and they ran for 127 yards at 4.4 ypr against Michigan last
week, but Iowa is solid up front on defense and the Redhawks don't have the passing
prowess to take advantage of a mediocre Hawkeyes secondary. Miami averaged just 6.2 yards
per pass last season with a seasoned quarterback and new starter, redshirt freshman Ben
Roethlisberger, averaged just 5.5 yards per pass last week against Michigan while getting
picked off 3 times. Iowa held Kent's poor pass attack to just 90 yards in 32 passes last
week (2.8 ypp), so they are capable of shutting down poor passing teams. Teams that were
3-8 or worse the previous year usually perform very well in game 2 after a victory in
their opener, so expect Iowa to be very enthusiastic for this game. The Hawkeyes also
qualify in a 31-7 ATS home favorite momentum situation as long as they remain favored by
18 points or less.

Downgrade Iowa to a 2-Star if they become a favorite of more than 14 points.
Pass if Iowa is favored by more than 18 points.

3 Star Selection
PITTSBURGH (-21.0) 35 S. Florida 3
Pittsburgh will have one of the best defenses in the nation this year as they return 10
starters from a unit that gave up just 2.6 ypr and 6.6 ypp last season. The Panthers
opened the season with a 31-0 win over Division 1AA East Tennessee State and now take on
a South Florida team that played Division 1AA last season. South Florida was a pretty
decent 7-4 in the lower division last year, but they return just 8 starters for their
move to Division 1A. The Bulls are led by talented quarterback Marquel Blackwell, who
threw for a mediocre 6.8 yards per pass last year but tossed only 4 interceptions while
running for 566 yards at 4.4 ypr. Blackwell threw for 7.0 ypp last week against a poor
Northern Illinois secondary and lost yardage on the ground. While Blackwell is a decent
Division 1AA quarterback, he will not fare so well against a tougher schedule and will be
harassed by fierce Pittsburgh pass rush that registered 7 sacks last week. Without much
time to throw, I doubt that Blackwell will be able to find open receivers against a
sticky Pitt secondary. South Florida doesn't have a rush attack and (51 yards on 30
rushes last week against Northern Illinois) Pitt only allowed 2.6 ypr, so Blackwell will
be put in some unfavorable passing situations in this game and I doubt that he'll lead
his team to more than one score (if they score at all). Pittsburgh's offense is hurt by
the absence of All-American WR Antonio Bryant, who missed last week's game and is listed
as doubtful this week. Pitt is still a better than average offense without Bryant as
quarterback David Priestly has put up solid numbers in his two years as a part-time
starter (8.2 yards per pass) and he should perform well enough in this game to put up
enough points to cover the favorable pointspread (opened at 25 and has come down). Pitt
beat East Tennessee State 31-0 last week, out-gaining them 414 yards to 180 yards. East
Tennessee was rated about 4 points worse than South Florida last season and South Florida
is not as good this year with just 8 returning starters. In other words, Pitt is laying
just 21 points against a team that is very similar talent-wise to the East Tennessee
State team that they beat by 31 points last week. Perhaps the spread dropped when it was
reported that Bryant would not play again this week. However, that news was already in
the opening line and I would have played the Panthers at that higher number. The Pitt
defense will dominate again this week and winning by 3 touchdowns or more should not be a
problem.

3 Star Selection
TEMPLE 17 Toledo (-7.5) 16
Temple returns an amazing 20 starters from a team that took major strides last season and
I expect them to make it to a bowl game this year. The Owls were 4-7 last year and lost 3
games by 7 points or less (all their wins were by comfortable margins), so they were
actually better than last year's record indicates. Toledo, meanwhile, returns 15 starters
from a team that was 10-1 last year and they destroyed Minnesota 38-7 last week at home.
That big win will give us some line value here and I have no problem taking a Temple team
that is capable of containing Toledo's Chester Taylor, who is coming off a year in which
he rushed for 1470 yards at 5.9 ypr and ran for 186 yards last week against Minnesota.
Temple has an outstanding defensive front 7 that yielded just 3.4 ypr last year and will
be even better this year with 10 starters back on defense. The Owls were dominating up
front last week, holding Navy's option rush attack to just 49 yards on 31 rushes, and
they are good enough to limit Taylor's yardage today. Toledo quarterback Tavares Bolden
averaged just 5.6 yards per pass last season and just 6.0 ypp last week against a poor
Minnesota secondary, so limiting the run ought to be enough to limit the Rockets'
offense. Last season, Toledo averaged just 19 points against the 2 good defensive teams
that they faced (Penn State and Western Michigan) and Temple should be able to hold them
in that range today. The Owls' offense will have a tough time against a very good Toledo
defense, but Temple ran for 285 yards at 5.3 ypr last week against a decent Navy run
defense and they did that without star running back Tanardo Sharps, who was nursing an
injury in order to be ready for this week's game (he's listed as probable). Sharps ran
for over 1000 yards last year at a very healthy 5.2 ypr clip and he will be eager to play
well with another top running back on the opposite sideline. Toledo allowed just 2.5 ypr
last season but they faced only one better than average rushing team last season and that
team, Northern Illinois, ran averaged 4.6 ypr and scored 24 points against the Rockets.
Last week, Toledo allowed 3.4 ypr to a mediocre Minnesota rush attack, so I expect Temple
to run the ball fairly well in this game. Temple won't have to score too many points to
cover the generous pointspread since their defense ought to keep Toledo's scoring down
and the Owls qualify in a number of great situations today. Temple qualifies in a 54-15-1
ATS home underdog momentum situation and a 33-7 ATS statistical indicator. My ratings
favor Toledo by 3 points but I'll call for the outright upset by Temple given the great
situations that they are in.

Downgrade Temple to a 2-Star Best Bet if they become an underdog of less than 7
points.

3 Star Selection
Washington St. (-4.5) 35 BOISE ST. 21
The Cougars gave us an easy 3-Star Best Bet winner last week in their 36-7 win over Idaho
and I will call on them again to deliver another winner tonight. Washington State's
balanced, potent offense should have another easy time moving the football as they face a
Boise State defense that returns just 3 starters from a unit that is just average against
the run and terrible defending the pass. Boise faced just 4 average or better passing
attacks last season and they allowed 322 passing yards per game at 7.8 ypp in those
games, including allowing Washington State to throw for 290 yards at 9.4 ypp in a 35-42
loss. Boise is even worse in the secondary this year with the loss of 3 All-Conference
defensive backs from that unit. South Carolina completed 69% of their passes against
Boise last week for 8.5 yards per pass and I expect similar results from Gesser this
week. Boise State scored 35 points in their loss to the Cougars last season, but the
Broncos are far less dangerous on offense with the departure of 4 year starting
quarterback Bart Hendricks, who averaged an incredible 9.6 yards per pass last year with
a 36-9 TD to interception ratio. New quarterback Ryan Dinwiddle averaged just 5.2 yards
per pass against South Carolina last week and this week faces another great pass defense.
The Cougars allowed 6.8 yards per pass last year against a schedule of good passing teams
that combined to average 7.3 ypp on offense for the season. With three-fourths of the
secondary returning, including 2 possible All-Pac 10 caliber players, the Cougars will be
considerably tougher to throw on this year. Last week, veteran Idaho quarterback John
Welsh, who averaged 7.9 ypp in 2000, was held to 66 passing yards in 26 attempts for 2.5
ypp! I doubt that Washington State can be that good again this week against the pass, but
I certainly don't see Dinwiddle doing much damage with his arm. The Broncos do have a
good rushing attack and they will probably pick up enough yards on the ground to score
some points. They just won't score enough to keep up with what their inexperienced
defense gives up. I am aware of Boise State's 10 straight spread wins at home, but all of
those wins were with Hendricks at quarterback and with Dirk Koetter as head coach,
neither of which is with the team anymore. Also, most of those big victories at home came
against lowly Big West teams. I am not concerned at all with Boise's home field advantage
as my ratings favor Washington State by 10 points and they also qualify in a solid 161-95-
4 ATS early season indicator that pegged them as a play last week also.

2 Star Selection
OREGON (-17.0) 24 Utah 17
The Ducks are an overrated team and I have no problem going against them with an always
competitive Utes squad that is 22-11 ATS as a road underdog under coach McBride,
including 13-1 ATS recently as a road dog of 2 points or more. Oregon, meanwhile, is now
just 8-19 ATS when favored by 9 points or more. I maintained most of last season that
quarterback Joey Harrington was overrated and I stated that again last week. The
Harrington for Heisman campaign is a joke. Harrington completed only 53% of his passes
last season for 7.3 yards per pass while tossing 14 interceptions. While those numbers
are certainly better than average (6.9 ypp is the national average), they are hardly
worthy of such praise. Last week, Harrington completed just 22 of 48 passes for only 5.8
ypp while throwing 2 interceptions. Utah loses all 4 starting defensive backs from a unit
that allowed just 6.1 ypp last season, but McBride has always fielded very good
secondaries. In fact, Utah has not allowed more than 52% completions in any of the last 7
seasons, including a few years when the secondary lost 3 or more starters. Last week,
Utah allowed just 5.4 yards per pass and intercepted 3 passes in their win over Utah
State, indicating that the Utes will be better than average defending the pass once
again. Utah is also good defending the run, as they allowed just 3.2 ypr last season and
should be just as good this year in that department. Oregon's RB Maurice Morris also gets
plenty of press, but he averaged a sub-par 4.2 ypr last season (the national average is
4.5 for running backs) and had just 18 yards on 15 rushes last week. Don't expect too
many points from the Ducks in this one. Oregon also has some trouble spots on defense
that Utah can take advantage of. While the Ducks have one of the nation's best
secondaries, the front 7 is vulnerable. Only 1 of Oregon's defensive front 7 is a
returning starter and the loss of players that accounted for 74% of the Ducks' tackles
for loss are now gone. Teams that lose such a high percentage of impact players on
defense usually struggle early in the season and Oregon qualifies in a negative 36-71 ATS
indicator based on that high percentage of sacks and tackles for loss from players that
have graduated. Wisconsin ran for a healthy 4.9 ypr against the rebuilt Ducks' front 7
last week and McBride will be smart enough to attack the Ducks on the ground with an
offensive line that did not lose a starter to graduation (although G Ta'amu is serving a
suspension). Utah ran behind that experienced line for 213 yards last week and will do a
solid job rushing again this week. I really don't expect much from the Utes' pass attack
against a very good Oregon secondary, but I am fond of defensive solid underdogs that can
run the ball and you should be too.

Pass if Utah becomes an underdog of less than 14 points.

2 Star Selection
RICE (-9.0) 31 Duke 13
The loss of starting quarterback Jeremy Hurd may actually have been a blessing for the
Owls as it allowed sophomore Kyle Herm to lead the offense in last week's 21-14 win at
Houston. Herm had limited action in his freshman campaign and proved to be a good running
quarterback for the option, gaining 136 rushing yards at 6.5 yards per rush. Herm ran for
108 yards on 18 carries last week, solidifying his spot as the starter. Herm appears to
be the best fit to run the ball with, but he has had problems throwing it and managed
only 16 yards in 8 passes last week. That should not be a problem when Rice faces teams
that can't defend the run very well. Last week, the Owls ran for 354 yards at a healthy
5.1 ypr behind an offensive line with returning starters at every position. Running for
that many yards on grass against a Houston defense that allowed only 3.4 ypr last year is
a good indication of things to come. Option teams usually perform better when playing on
the same surface that they play on at home since a different surface can affect the
timing of their offense. Rice plays on artificial turf at home and they are 21-10-1 ATS
on the fake stuff the last few years while going just 10-18 ATS on natural grass under
coach Hatfield. Now, Rice comes home to face a Duke team that surrendered 4.6 ypr last
season and gave up 200 rushing yards at 5.3 ypr to Florida State last week. While the
Blue Devils should be better defending the run this year, I still rate them as worse than
average and don't see them handling the option very well. A horrible Wake Forest offense
ran some option against Duke last season and the Blue Devils surrendered 244 rushing
yards at 5.1 ypr and 28 points to a Demon Deacons squad that averaged only 3.6 ypr and 16
points for the season. I forecast Rice to rack up over 350 rushing yards again today.
Duke's offense will be unable to keep up against a solid Rice defense that is better than
average against both the run and the pass with 8 returning starters coming back to a unit
that was solid a year ago (Rice allowed 29 points per game but faced great offensive
teams Michigan, Oklahoma, San Jose State, Fresno State, TCU and UTEP last season). Duke's
offense should be better than last year's unit that averaged just 14 points but they
still look pretty bad this year even with 8 returning starters. Rice qualifies in a 55-17-
1 ATS statistical indicator I see no reason not to ride that angle for a Best Bet since
that indicator plays on good rushing teams facing teams that statistically don't stop the
run well. That is certainly the case here.

Strong Opinion
Indiana 28 NO CAROLINA ST. (-6.5) 27
In last year's opener, the Hoosiers led the Wolfpack by 12 points with 5 minutes left but
could not hold the lead and lost by 3 points, one of 4 losses by 7 points or less during
their disappointing 3-8 season. Indiana had no trouble scoring (31 ppg), they just
couldn't stop teams from scoring more (39 ppg allowed). The big news in Bloomington is
the switch of exciting 3 year starting quarterback Antwaan Randle El to wide receiver.
Randle El ran for 1270 yards at 5.8 ypr but had a bad year throwing the football,
completing only 48% of his passes. Junior Tommy Jones steps in to play quarterback and
should do at least as well throwing the football. You might think that the running stats
would take a hit with the loss of Randle El's 1270 yards and 5.8 ypr, but a great
offensive line returns intact along with super running back Levron Williams (7.0 ypr in 2
seasons) and the running backs as a unit averaged 5.8 ypr last season. Overall, Indiana
should once again be a good offensive team. NC State put up pretty good offensive numbers
themselves last season with freshman quarterback Phillip Rivers and receiver Koren
Robinson doing most of the damage for a unit that averaged 32 points per contest.
Robinson was the #1 draft choice of the Seattle Seahawks and he will be sorely missed
after hauling in 1218 yards and scoring 14 touchdowns. Also missed will be offensive
coordinator Norm Chow, who transformed the offense in his one year here in Raleigh. While
Rivers should be better in his sophomore season, I really don't see him having much
better numbers without Robinson to throw to. Rivers was also aided last year with a
schedule of opponents that couldn't stop the pass. Rivers averaged a solid 7.0 yards per
pass, but NC State's opponents combined to allow an average of 7.6 yards per pass, so the
Wolfpack actually had a below average pass attack last year. The only team that NC State
faced that was better than average defending the pass was Florida State and Rivers threw
for only 5.5 ypp in that game. Indiana allowed a horrid 8.0 yards per pass last season
after losing 2 starters in the pre-season, but they will much improved in that area,
although still below average, this season with 3 of 4 starters returning and an upgrade
in talent. The Hoosiers will certainly improve upon the 4.7 ypr that they allowed last
season and I expect NC State to mount an average rush attack in this game after running
for only 3.3 ypr last season as they appear improved along the offensive line. While NC
State will have a decent offensive performance in this game, I will call for the Hoosiers
to control matters with their offense against a solid Wolfpack defense that will improve
on the mediocre 5.1 yards per play that they surrendered last season. NC State's strength
on that unit was defending the pass, but they were susceptible to good running teams last
year and allowed Indiana to rush for 236 yards at 5.4 ypr in last year's meeting.
Indiana's 16 returning starters have been focused on this revenge game all summer long
and teams with that many returning starters usually get their revenge in their opener. In
fact, Indiana qualifies in a 40-15 ATS game 1 revenge situation and they are capable of
the upset tonight.

Strong Opinion
TEXAS (-22.0) 35 North Carolina 7
Carolina scored on a 77 yard run early in the first quarter at Maryland last week but
gained just 276 total yards for the entire game in their 7-23 loss. The lack of offense
and a -3 in turnover margin masked another very good defensive effort by the Tarheels'
defense, who allowed just 246 total yards to the Terps after yielding just 286 yards to
Oklahoma the week before. The Tarheels have out-gained their two opponents by an average
of 283 yards to 267 yards per game, but are -7 in turnover margin. I doubt that Carolina
will even come close to out-gaining the Longhorns in this game and I see them getting
beaten soundly even if turnovers are not a problem for them (they were also -12 in
turnover margin last season). Texas didn't look too good on offense in last week's 41-7
win over New Mexico State, averaging just 4.8 yards per play, but the Longhorns have
plenty of firepower and I expect a better performance from that unit today. Texas
averaged in impressive 5.9 yards per play on offense last season and return 9 of 11
starters from that side of the ball and will be even better this year with Chris Simms as
the undisputed starting quarterback. North Carolina does have a very good defense and
they are especially tough to run on, but I don't see them keeping Texas from moving the
ball through the air. The Tarheels actually have an above average secondary, but they
allowed good passing teams Florida State, Georgia Tech, Clemson and Pittsburgh to average
10.1 yards per pass against them last season. Simms averaged 8.7 yards per pass last
season and should have a very effective outing today. North Carolina, meanwhile, will
have few chances to score against a Texas defense that rates among the best in the
nation. The 'Horns allowed just 2.7 ypr and 5.6 ypp last season and return 8 starters to
the defense and should be even better this season. North Carolina has a poor rushing
attack and throwing into the Texas secondary will only lead to trouble as Texas picked
off 18 passes last year and returned 5 of them for touchdowns. Texas has the best
secondary in the nation and Ronald Curry has not proven capable of consistently beating
any team through the air. Texas has covered 6 straight home games when not laying 27
points or more and this looks like a game that will add to that tally.

Strong Opinion
Georgia Tech (-24.0) 38 NAVY 7
Georgia Tech has whipped the Middies the last two years, 40-13 at home last year and 49-
14 here in Annapolis in '99. Navy's once great rush attack (284 yards per game at 5.2 ypr
from '96 through '99) has disappeared. Last year, the Midshipmen averaged just 178 yards
at 3.6 ypr and last week managed only 49 yards on 31 rushes in their 19 point loss at
Temple. The pre-season injury to great running quarterback Brian Madden hurt them last
year and Madden is expected to be out again this week due to a suspension. Starting
quarterback Ed Malinowski is a better throwing quarterback than Madden, but Malinowski
averaged just 2.0 ypr last year and had just 3 yards rushing last week. By contrast,
Madden ran for 961 yards at 5.3 ypr in just 5 starts in '99. Without Madden in the lineup
and with 4 new starters on the offensive line, I don't see Navy having any success
running against a very good Georgia Tech front 7 that allowed just 2.7 ypr last year and
held the Syracuse option to just 59 yards rushing on 26 carries two weeks ago (and
allowed just 70 yards on 34 rushes last week to the Citadel). Malinowski, while better
than Manning throwing the ball, is still a below average passer and I just don't think
he'll be able to beat a sound Yellow Jackets' secondary through the air. Georgia Tech has
held both of their opponents to 7 points and that's about all Navy will muster today. The
Yellow Jackets' offense struggled a bit in their first game without former offensive
coordinator Ralph Friedgen, but that was against a very good Syracuse defense. The
offense looked great in scoring 28 first half points last week and quarterback George
Godsey is now averaging 10.6 yards per pass with zero interceptions in two games and
ought to have another big day throwing into a poor Navy secondary that surrendered 8.8
yards per pass last season. The Middies are stronger in the secondary this year, but I
still rate them considerably below average and they will have no answer for Godsey. Navy
does stop the run pretty well and Georgia Tech still has not established a good rushing
attack (3.0 ypr in 2 games), but they will convert on most of their 3rd down passes and
move the ball even without the benefit of a good rush attack. Navy is just 5-18 ATS as a
home underdog of more than 3 points over the years and Georgia Tech should administer
another beating today even if they are peeking ahead towards next week's showdown with
Florida State.

Strong Opinion
Fresno St. 27 WISCONSIN (-4.0) 24
Fresno State is for real. A narrow win at Colorado and a 44-24 whipping of highly ranked
Oregon State have the Bulldogs believing in themselves and I'll call for another upset
win this week here in Madison. The Bulldogs are led by future NFL quarterback David Carr,
who has thrown for 538 yards in two games at 7.7 yards per pass with zero interceptions
against two very good defensive backfields. Wisconsin has a good secondary as well and
they held Oregon's Joey Harrington to just 5.8 yards per pass last week. However, Carr is
better than Harrington and should put up pretty decent numbers again this week after
beating one of the nation's best secondaries for 340 yards on just 34 tosses last week.
While Carr gets the press, it is the Bulldogs' defense that is the key here. Fresno State
has limited two explosive offensive teams to just 368 total yards per game at 1.5 ypr and
7.4 ypp. Leading Heisman Trophy candidate Ken Simonton from Oregon State had just 42
yards on 15 carries against the Bulldogs last week and Fresno is quite capable of
shutting down Wisconsin's rush attack as well. The 7.4 yards per pass that Fresno has
allowed is also very good when you consider that Colorado quarterback Ochs and Oregon
State quarterback Smith will both average around 8 yards per pass this season. Fresno
returned all 4 starters to a secondary that yielded just 6.2 yards per pass last year, so
there is no question that the 'Dogs can stop the pass. Wisconsin's Jim Sorgi has once
again done a good job filling in for injured starter Brooks Bollinger and Sorgi is
capable of putting up decent numbers in this game. However, the Badgers are a running
team and Fresno will not make it easy to move the ball on the ground. Fresno's offense
won't have much of a rush attack either, but Carr should move the ball through the air
well enough to get the Bulldogs into the end zone a few times. Fresno has not been a
great road team in recent years (5-17-1 ATS when not getting at least 12 points, but 1-0
this year), but the Bulldogs qualify in a 161-95-4 ATS early season indicator that has
worked well for me over the years.

Strong Opinion
MIDDLE TENN (-13.5) 41 Troy State 21
Middle Tennessee racked up 300 rushing yards and 308 passing yards in their 37-28 win at
Vanderbilt last week and they should rack up more huge chunks of yardage this week if
they can avoid the letdown after their big win over and SEC school. The Blue Raiders were
just as potent last year on offense and they should have good success against a Troy
State defense that was very good by Division 1AA standards, but will be below par in
Division 1A. The Troy State offense will be well below average in Division 1A ball and
they don't appear capable of taking full advantage of a soft Middle Tennessee defense
that allowed Vanderbilt to roll up 477 yards last week. MTS qualifies in a 55-17-1 ATS
early season momentum situation, so I will consider them a strong opinion in this game
based on that angle.

Strong Opinion
TCU (-12.0) 13 SMU 7
The Mustangs lost 6-36 at Louisiana Tech last week, but that was a VERY misleading final
and gives us plenty of line value on them this week. SMU's solid defense held Tech to
just 245 total yards, but two defensive touchdowns by the Bulldogs and a third TD set up
by another Mustangs' miscue led to 21 gift points. While the defense was as good as
expected, the offense was horrible. SMU was expected to be better offensively this year
with 8 returning starters on that side of the ball, but the Mustangs averaged a pathetic
3.3 yards per play against a soft Louisiana Tech defense. I do expect a better offensive
performance from SMU this year, but they will not be good enough to score much against a
TCU defense that is playing better than last year's outstanding unit. TCU opened the
season by limiting a powerful Nebraska offense to just 21 points on 310 total yards and
then shut down North Texas last week, holding them to just 129 yards and a lone field
goal. TCU's offense has gone from great to poor without star RB Tomlinson and the loss of
4 starting offensive lineman. The Horned Frogs were held to 186 total yards by Nebraska,
which certainly can be forgiven. But, TCU could tally just 198 total yards against a
North Texas defense that is not as good as SMU's stop unit. This ought to be a very low
scoring game and the points look worth taking.

Strong Opinion
GEORGIA 24 South Carolina (-2.0) 19
Last year, I pegged South Carolina to upset Georgia as a 10 point home underdog a week
after the Gamecocks broke a 21 game losing streak. A 21-10 win ensued and I rode the Lou
Holtz' team to a number of Best Bet wins as they remained underrated all season long.
Last week, I used South Carolina as a 2-Star Best Bet and 2 missed extra points (one
kicking and one two-pointer attempt) and a late Boise touchdown cost me the win in that
game. Now, it looks like all the value in taking South Carolina has ended as they went
from an opening 3 point underdog in this game to a 2 point favorite despite numerous
injuries. My ratings show that Georgia by 3 is exactly what the line should be and I'm
favoring Georgia to win by even more due to those Carolina injuries and a 102-42-4 ATS
home momentum situation favoring Georgia in this game. These two teams are eerily similar
on both sides of the ball, with South Carolina being a better running team and Georgia
perhaps a better passing team with young David Greene completing 21 of 29 passes for 285
yards in his debut, rewarding coach Richt's choice to start him over the more experienced
Cory Phillips. Defensively, both teams are very good defending the run and extremely good
against the pass. South Carolina is no longer a pointspread value, so I will side with a
vengeful Georgia team in a good situation. Also, the Gamecocks were 0-3 straight up on
the road against good teams last year, losing at Alabama, Florida, and Clemson. They also
barely beat a weak Kentucky team 20-17 on the road last year. The fact that Bulldogs QB
Greene is so inexperienced is the only reason I'm not taking Georgia as a Best Bet in
this game.

Strong Opinion
ARIZONA ST. (-7.0) 21 San Diego St. 20
The Sun Devils' new offense will get a stiff test against a veteran San Diego State
defense that held Arizona to just 231 total yards last week. The Aztecs are very good
defending both the run and the pass and I expect Arizona State to be just average
offensively across the board this year, at least until they get comfortable with the new
offense. San Diego State's offense had the unenviable task of dealing with a dominating
Arizona defense and they could manage just 201 yards and 10 points in their loss to the
Wildcats. San Diego State doesn't have much of a running attack, but quarterback Lon
Sheriff averaged 7.5 yards per pass last year and returns his entire offense with him
this year. Sheriff should put up pretty decent numbers against a good, but not great ASU
secondary and the running game could contribute for once since the Devils should be just
average defending the run. It's tough to know exactly how the Sun Devils will perform in
new coach Koettner's offense, but I do know that San Diego State has a great defense and
taking points with them looks like a solid play, especially after their disappointing 10-
23 loss to Arizona in which the Wildcats returned a fumble for a touchdown. San Diego
State has 20 returning starters and teams with an abundance of veteran starters usually
bounce back from a sub-par opening game performance, especially in the underdog role.

Strong Opinion
VIRGINIA TECH (-15.0) 28 Western Mich 10
The Hokies are now without their two biggest offensive weapons from a year ago, #1 draft
pick QB Michael Vick and future NFL draft pick RB Lee Suggs, who was injured last week
and is out for the season. Hokies fans need not panic. Grant Noel did an excellent job in
his first start last week, completing 16 of 20 passes for 267 yards and 3 touchdowns and
appears to be a lot more accurate than Vick was (54% last year). I also don't think the
rushing attack will drop off much with Keith Burnell getting the load of the work.
Burnell is just as fast as Suggs and has averaged nearly 7 yards per carry in his 27
carries the last two seasons, including 9 for 71 yards last week. Virginia Tech averaged
5.2 yards per rush last year with Vick and Suggs as their top two rushers. Aside from
those two, the rest of the Hokies' backs averaged 4.85 ypr, so the rush attack will still
be good this season. Western Michigan will put up some resistance as they are a very good
defensive team. The Broncos allowed just 2.7 ypr and 6.2 ypp last year and performed well
outside of the MAC, limiting Wisconsin and Iowa to an average of 20 points (they also
allowed just 14 points to Toledo). Western Michigan will be just as tough defensively
this year, although not quite as good against the rush with the loss of two outstanding
linebackers (the secondary will be better though). My ratings still forecast 28 points
for the Hokies as they should run for over 4 yards per rush and throw for close to 7
yards per pass. Western Michigan's offense returns QB Jeff Welsh (7.2 ypp last year), but
only 4 other offensive starters return and Welsh will not have a running attack to
support him in this game. Virginia Tech also has one of the nation's top secondaries and
I don't see Welsh doing too much damage in the air. The line has been adjusted down due
to the injury to Suggs, but I don't see that as being too much of a factor so I will use
the line value and lean with the Hokies, who are 18-8-1 ATS at home when not laying 30
points or more. The Under is worth a look here.

Strong Opinion
Tennessee (-13.0) 20 ARKANSAS 7
This is a lot of points to be giving in what should be a game dominated by the defenses.
The Vols looked impressive on the scoreboard in last week's 33-9 win over Syracuse but
Tennessee's offense struggled against a solid Syracuse stop unit. The Volunteers ran the
ball better than I expected last week (197 yards at 5.1 ypr), but they had trouble
throwing into a good Syracuse secondary and Clausen completed just over 50% of his passes
for an average of just 5.0 yards per pass. I expect Tennessee to be able to run the ball
pretty well again this week against a mediocre Arkansas defensive front that allowed UNLV
to rush for 258 yards at 4.8 ypr. However, Clausen's difficulties should continue as well
against a Hogs secondary that is among the very best in the nation. Arkansas allowed just
6.0 yards per pass last season against good competition and return all 4 starters to
their secondary. Last week the Razorbacks limited UNLV's star quarterback Jason Thomas to
4 of 16 passing for just 40 aerial yards with 3 interceptions (Thomas averaged 8.8 ypp
last year and over 11 yards per pass against Arkansas in Vegas Bowl last December).
Tennessee will not be able to move the ball consistently without a good pass attack and I
don't see them scoring much more than 20 points, if that. Tennessee is also very good
defensively and the defend both the run and pass equally well. Stopping the run is the
key for the Vols in this game since Arkansas only has one quarterback that can throw and
he is unable to play. Last year, Robbie Hampton got most of the playing time despite some
nagging injuries and he averaged just 5.8 yards per pass. The other quarterbacks combined
to average a pathetic 4.0 yards per pass in 91 attempts while tossing 7 interceptions.
Last week, with Hampton not available, Zak Clark and Ryan Sorahan combined to go 10 of 32
passing for just 89 yards (2.8 ypp). Without a pass attack, it will be up to talented
backs Talley and Cobbs to carry the offense. However, Tennessee allowed just 2.8 ypr last
season and appears to be even better this year, holding a pretty good Syracuse rush
attack to just 1.8 yards per rush last week. The Arkansas backs combined for just 50
yards on 22 carries last week against a UNLV defense that stacked the line to stop the
run, knowing that Arkansas could not beat them in the air. Tennessee can do the same
thing today and the Razorbacks will have trouble scoring. I'd stay away from the side in
this one, but the UNDER looks appealing.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Your subsciption to this package ends on 31-Jan-02.


Does Matt have time to do all the LNG work?  My guess is that he may have the
time.  Mark

	Alan Aronowitz
	03/02/2001 02:28 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Singapore Office LNG Support Activities

FYI. This will greatly impact Matt's workload and availability for potential
EBS activities. I would like to visit with you about this.

Regards, Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 02:26 PM -----

	Daniel R Rogers@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	03/02/2001 12:27 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Singapore Office LNG Support Activities

Alan,

As we discussed the other day, I'm forwarding my "work list" of projects
either currently or soon to be underway that will be led by V V Rao's team
out of Singapore (with support from Dubai and Houston):

1. Australia -- Northwest Shelf LNG "Wedge Quantities" bid.  Proposal for
mid-term, firm (but declining over time) LNG supply for merchant trading
activities prepared and being sent to NWS next week.  Preparation and
negotiations of SPA, transportation and marketing contracts to follow.

2. Australia -- Northwest Shelf LNG Master Spot LNG Trading Agreement --
draft prepared and being sent to counterparty next week.  Negotiations to
follow.

3. Indonesia -- PERTAMINA Master Spot LNG Trading Agreement -- draft prepared
and being sent to counterparty next week.  Negotiations to follow.

4. Japan -- Osaka Gas Co. Master Spot LNG Trading Agreement -- draft prepared
and sent to counterparty.  Expect responsive comments next week.
Negotiations to follow.

5. Malaysia/Spain -- LNG fuel supply for Enron's Arcos IPP in Spain --
initial term sheet under development.  Expect this one to heat up in the next
few months.

6. Malaysia -- Malaysia LNG Master Spot LNG Trading Agreement -- draft
prepared and will be sent to counterparty later in the month.  Negotiations
to follow.

7. Malaysia -- "Bintulu Hub" e-commerce venture with Malaysia LNG, Malaysia
Int'l. Trading Co., Enron LNG Marketing and Enron Networks -- under
development.  Legal needs will depend somewhat on final deal format.  Goal is
to be set up for LNG commodity and LNG transportation capacity e-trading
(possibly on a Deal Bench auction site platform) by year-end.  May expand to
cover crude oil commodity and transportation capacity trading as well
following recent meetings in London.

8. Japan -- LNG Receiving Terminal & gas and power marketing joint
development project with Enron LNG Marketing LLC, BHP and EnCom.  Initial
draft of joint development MOU prepared.  Negotiations to follow.

9. Korea -- KOGAS Winter Cargo Supply & Transportation Opportunities -- under
develoopment.  Various MOU drafts have been exchanged, but deal structure and
timing keep moving around.  Legal needs will ultimately depend somewhat on
final deal format.

10. Master LNG Vessel Transportation Capacity Access/Trading Agreements --
under early development, but should accelerate to match pace of no. 7 above.
Document will then be used to propose access to numerous other LNG vessel
owners/charterers who may wish to participate with Enron in making a market
for spare transportation capacity.  Initial draft underway in Houston, but
may be handed off to Singapore at some point.

As you can see, there's presently quite a lot of activity being undertaken
from Singapore.  Much of this has arisen since the beginning of this year.
Nancy and I have been involved in preparing initial drafts, providing
comments, etc. from Houston (and occasional fly-in appearances)  and V V
presently has on-the-ground legal support from an excellent Linklaters Team
based in Singapore.  Matt Lee has now circled with V V's team and is
undergoing both intensive commercial LNG training and intensive LNG trading
contract training.  I suspect that on average this year, we could easily use
70-100% of  Matt Lee's time (depending on how the above activities progress).

Kind regards,
Dan


Steve Kean will not be able to attend (he's out of the country).

	Joan Stransky
	05/30/2001 09:15 AM

To: Ursula Brenner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rita Hartfield/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Amy Oberg/HOU/EES@EES, Bruce N Stram/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Cutler/HOU/EES@EES,
John Enerson/Enron@EnronXGate, Alhamd Alkhayat/Enron@EnronXGate, Jay
Ferry/HOU/EES@EES, Amr Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Lunch Invitation: Lay Lecture Series (June 13)

Rob Bradley would like to invite you to sit at the Enron table to hear the
new chairman of George W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisors.   The Houston
Forum and the UH Department of Economics present:

Speaker:  Dr. Glenn Hubbard, Chair, Council of Economic Advisors

Houston Club (Texas Room - 10th Floor,  across from Chase Tower)

Date:  June 13 (Wednesday)

Time:  12:00-1:30  (registration 11:30-12:00)

Please RSVP with me Joan Stransky (3-7431) if you would like to attend.  We
will remind you as the date approaches.


Kay,  Please see the attached.


Any intelligence from "closed door" meeting?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001 10:45 PM -----

	"Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>
	02/21/2001 12:19 PM

		 To: "Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>, "William Hall"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue
Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Stephanie
Newell" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Ross Ain"
<rain@caithnessenergy.com>, "Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>,
"Robert Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Richard Hyde"
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Randy Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Paula
Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"Marty McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "Larrea, John" <John.g.Larrea@williams.com>, "kent
Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jack
Hawks" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Eric
Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Doug
Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean Gosselin"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Craig Chancellor" <craigc@calpine.com>, "Cody
Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Gates" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "Bob Escalante"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill
Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Joe Greco"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie
Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "Theo Pathos" <theo@ppallc.com>, "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Cary Rudman"
<cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Delany Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "DJ
Smith" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>,
"Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>,
"Marie Moretti" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Maureen OHaren"
<Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Phil Isenberg"
<Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Ron Tom"
<thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Susan
McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Chris Ellison" <CTE@eslawfirm.com>,
"Doug Kerner" <runwithmee@aol.com>, "Andy Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>
		 Subject: Re: Budget Hearing on AB 1x today

Julie: Please note the meeting is titled "Executive Session",  therefore it
is not open to the public. John Rozsa is handling the meeting for Sen.
Peace.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>; "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>; "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>; "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>; "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>; "Steve Iliff"
<siliff@riobravo-gm.com>; "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>; "Ross Ain" <rain@caithnessenergy.com>;
"Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>; "Robert Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>; "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>; "Randy
Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>; "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>; "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>;
"Marty McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>; "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>; "Larrea, John" <John.g.Larrea@williams.com>; "kent
Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>; "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>; "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>;
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>; "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>; "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>; "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>; "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>; "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>; "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>;
"Jack Hawks" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>; "Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>; "Greg
Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>; "Frank DeRosa" <fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>;
"Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>; "Eileen Koch"
<eileenk@calpine.com>; "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>; "Duane Nelson"
<dnelsen@msn.com>; "Doug Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>; "Dean
Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>; "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>;
"Curtis Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>; "Curt Hatton"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>; "Craig Chancellor" <craigc@calpine.com>; "Cody
Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>; "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>; "Bob Gates" <bob.gates@enron.com>; "Bob
Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>; "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>;
"Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>; "Bill Carlson"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>; "Joe Greco"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>; "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>; "Katie
Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
Cc: "Theo Pathos" <theo@ppallc.com>; "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>; "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>; "Bev Hansen"
<bhansen@lhom.com>; "Cary Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>; "Delany Hunter"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>; "DJ Smith" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>;
"Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>; "Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>;
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>; "Marie Moretti"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>; "Maureen OHaren" <Oharen@HMOT.com>; "Mike
Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>; "Phil Isenberg" <Isenberg@HMOT.com>; "Robert
Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>; "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>; "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com>; "Susan McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>; "Chris
Ellison" <CTE@eslawfirm.com>; "Doug Kerner" <runwithmee@aol.com>; "Andy
Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 8:57 AM
Subject: Budget Hearing on AB 1x today

> FYI:
>
> There is a Joint Legislative Budget Committee meeting today Chaired by
Sen.
> Peace at 3 p.m in the Maddy Lounge in Room 3030.
>
> SUBJECT: Preservation of Legal Rights and Pursuit of Legal Remedies in the
> Context of Procurement and Contractual Activities Being Conducted Under
> Assembly Bill No. 1 of the first Extraordinary Session.
>
>
> Julee Malinowski-Ball
> Senior Associate
> Edson + Modisette
> 916-552-7070
> FAX-552-7075
> jmball@ns.net
>
>
>


Ted

Please find attached mail as distributed  by Enron Metals senior management
today. The authorised trader list has been extended by one person only and
submitted to Rick for approval. The memo lays down the interaction between
the authorised traders and the requirements of central direction of trading
activities for agency trading.

Regards
Andy

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT on 01/11/2000
13:36 ---------------------------

Michael J Hutchinson@ENRON
01/11/2000 13:33
Sent by: Debbie Foot@ENRON
To: Enron Metals Limited
cc: Michael Farmer/EU/Enron@ENRON, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Authorised Traders

Enron Corporate policies lay down requirements for trading activities with
respect to authorised traders and agency trading. The attached memo details
these for Enron Metals. All personnel should read the attached memo and if
they have any questions direct them at either of us, or Andrew Cornfield in
Risk Management.

Mike Hutchinson
Mike farmer


Sheila,

There were some handwritten changes made by Greg Whalley on the draft..
I am sending you a copy  in a few minutes.

Vince

From: Sheila Walton/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 06:05 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Contract update

Vince, if there are some differences that we need to correct, you and I can
meet tomorrow when you bring the contract in. I am available anytime after
lunch.  Please call me at X30649.

Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 3:10 PM
To: Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc: Kaminski, Vince
Subject: Contract update

Sheila,

Some minor differences between the draft and the final executed version.
I have forgotten to bring the draft today, I shall send  a copy to you
tomorrow.
There were some hand-written changes made by Greg ijn the draft that were not
transferred to
the final version.

Vince


FYI, I just bumped up the forecast for next week from $19,000 to $37,000 because Tallahassee took the swing gas for the weekend.  I've also put a manual date and time on my swing gas cash forecast worksheet.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Polsky, Phil
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 9:20 AM
To:	Boyt, Eric; Cash, Larry; Dhont, Margaret; Long, Lindsay; McMichael Jr., Ed; Sewell, Doug
Cc:	Concannon, Ruth; Germany, Chris
Subject:	3-1-02 Gas Cash.xls

Updated forecast for next week attached.

 << File: 3-1-02 Gas Cash.xls >>


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042214.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: CRLP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  64.70 / Final:  64.67)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


I spoke w/ Brian Russo today to determine whether he sent payment as he indicated on 3/13/02.  He admitted that BG&E dropped the ball and would get the payment via wire to ENA tomorrow.  He also said there are a few invoices wherein ENA owes BG&E.  If they are all post-petition he is planning to net the amounts.

I provided Brian w/ wire instructions.

Brian again stated he is willing to pay default interest when the rate is provided.  That issue is in my court.

Susan: DLL update please.

Cynthia:  Hopefully this money shows up this time.

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 05:55
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           07/11/2000 04:59 PM

To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000
04:59 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert Badeer                           07/11/2000 02:44 PM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:17 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE:

Jeff --

I'd leave the number blank for all parties to be discussed between the different parties.  Best way would be to have some Attachments for the amount that the companies can sign after everything else.  Don't want Dan Douglas to know the $$$ before Richard Sanders oks.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 6:59 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:

Quck question:  w.r.t. to the stipulation with Edison.  1) Do we care that D. Douglas will know what our claim (or proposed settlement amount is), i.e., do we prefer that Dan sign a confidentiality agreement?  2)  When we file the stipulation at the Commission, do we care that the universe will see the number, i.e., do we prefer to file any such stipulation under seal at the Commission?  Not sure if this matters whatsoever. But it might.  Who's the person that needs to answer these questions?

Best,
Jeff


Steven (and all):

I reviewed the draft and have the following comments which I have already
communicated to Diane Fellman, before I realized that you asked for comments
to go through you.

1.  Might want to further clarify that the scope of issues addressing
disposition, whether or not the Commission grants an OII, should address
environmental review, market power and interim credit.  This should go into
the Introductory section.
2.  Page 6, Data that is of a non-confidential nature should be publically
available.  Data which  is confidential should be available to bidders
subject to a confidentiality agreement.  PG&E should also consider other
means to access such data other than through visiting the data room, ie.
electronically.
3.  Page 9, CAPPA, in addition to determine whether or not it is appropriate
for the utility to retain the contracts, the Commission should require that
PG&E value these assets, in accordance w/ the draft decision (should be voted
out on Thursday) and in compliance w/ the statute which requires the net
valuation of all above and below market assets.
4.  I understand the reason for pursuing interim credit vs. interim
valuation.  It is likely to become a semantic discussion though.
5.  Suggested that you include the basis of evaluating bids as between
individual bundles and watershed.

Please call me if you have comments/questions.  415-782-7821

"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com> on 11/01/99 07:06:13 AM
Please respond to "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>

To:	Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, "Jake M. Rudisill" <jake@calpine.com>, "Bill
Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "William F Hall III" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
"Curtis Kebler" <Curtis_l_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>
cc:

Subject:	Draft IEP Hydro Comments:  Including Attachment

Oops!  I forgot the attachment.
 - att1.htm
 - Hydro - IEP Limited Protest to PG&E - Draft  11-1-99.rtf


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041904.txt