I spoke with WHP management yesterday and we are still supporting the
Comprehensive Settlement - of course.  We have not reserved any time on
Tuesday to speak, though.  There is a possibility that could change at the
last minute, but as some of you might know, WHP is currently negotiating the
sale of its California assets.  Things are in limbo to say the least.  It
would be a short, terse message from WHP, if any.

I think Mike's suggestion that some of the details have another look should
focus towards the Interim Settlement, or more specifically the PD
provisions, as opposed to anything in the CS.  Even though we can all
express our support of the CS, it is not being voted on, and there is no
alternate decision that would even allow that for now.  But as Mike
suggests, maybe the Commission can be persuaded that the status quo needs to
change in light of today's environment; which means the PD has to be
changed.

John Burkholder

----- Original Message -----
From: <Michael.Alexander@sce.com>
To: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
Cc: <burkee@cts.com>; <jdasovic@enron.com>; <MDay@GMSSR.com>;
<paulAmirault@aec.ca>; <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>; Tom Beach
<tomb@crossborderenergy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: Commission OII Hearings

>
> I have just asked the CPUC for time to speak on Edison's behalf.  I am
> still drafting our response (just got permission/instructions from my
> management) We intend to support the settlement, but suggest that, in
light
> of the delays which have occurred in implementation, and the drastic
> changes which have occurred in California's energy markets, and the
> infrastructure proceeding that is on-going, in particular, how much
> additional take-away capacity is required to support the proposed
> interstate pipeline expansions, it may be appropriate to renegotiate some
> of the details of the settlement and/or for the Commission to take
> additional testimony/evidence.
>
> --
> Michael S. Alexander
> Southern California Edison
> Energy Supply and Management (ES&M)
> 626-302-2029
> 626-302-3254 (fax)
>
>
>
>
>                     Jeff.Dasovich
>                     @enron.com           To:     Tom Beach
<tomb@crossborderenergy.com>
>                                          cc:     burkee@cts.com,
jdasovic@enron.com,
>                     05/15/2001           MDay@GMSSR.com,
Michael.Alexander@sce.com,
>                     08:51 AM             paulAmirault@aec.ca,
>                                          rick.counihan@greenmountain.com
>                                          Subject:     Re: Commission OII
Hearings
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Enron will very vigorously support the CS and I would hope that we could
> get as many people as possible to do the same.  Let's face it,
California's
> gas industry is a mess for the same reasons the electricity industry is a
> mess (despite, and perhaps contrary to, the substantially more narrow
> reasoning offered by the Brattle Group).  The CS is a well-thought-out,
> well-designed program for moving forward; unlike the "interim," which
takes
> two steps back.  Can we split up the names of all the people who signed on
> and call them and try to get them to show up in support?
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
>                     Tom Beach
>
>                     <tomb@crossbordere        To:
> Michael.Alexander@sce.com,
>                     nergy.com>                MDay@GMSSR.com,
> burkee@cts.com,
>                                               jdasovic@enron.com,
>
>                     05/14/2001 11:37
> rick.counihan@greenmountain.com,
>                     PM                        paulAmirault@aec.ca
>
>                                               cc:
>
>                                               Subject:     Re: Commission
> OII Hearings
>
>
>
>
> Watson has asked for time to speak.  I'm planning to continue to support
> the
> CS.  It brings some greater stability and certainty to SoCalGas' noncore
> rates.  The allocation of backbone capacity might improve shippers'
> certainty of being able to move gas through Topock and Wheeler Ridge.  In
> the short term, it's hard to say how much that might help prices, but I
> doubt that it would make them worse.  In the longer term, if new
generation
> on the PG&E and Kern / Mojave systems, plus the North Baja and Questar
> lines, actually reduce SoCalGas' throughput, then a SoCalGas city-gate
> market might be pretty competitive.  Finally, the CS removes SoCalGas'
> favorite argument in favor of the peaking rate.
>
> So what are Edison and Enron going to do?
>
> Tom
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Michael.Alexander@sce.com>
> To: <MDay@GMSSR.com>; <burkee@cts.com>; <jdasovic@enron.com>;
> <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>; <paulAmirault@aec.ca>;
> <tomb@crossborderenergy.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 7:26 PM
> Subject: Commission OII Hearings
>
>
> > I was just wondering what any of you guys are thinking about doing at
the
> > Gas OII meeting next Tuesday.  Are any of you planning on making a
> > presentation?  If so, do you intend to support the settlement as filed,
> or
> > are there modifications you think are appropriate given the way SoCalGas
> > has handled its system in the past few months?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > P.S.  FYI, I am out of town, so I am not available by phone until
Monday.
> >
> > --
> > Michael S. Alexander
> > Southern California Edison
> > Energy Supply and Management (ES&M)
> > 626-302-2029
> > 626-302-3254 (fax)
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Attached is the revised interest rate swap. We will send the signature page
tomorrow.

 <<interest rate confirm.doc>>

Tracy Ross, Counsel, Royal Bank of Canada
Phone: 416-974-5503; Fax: 416-974-2217
File -

This email may be privileged and confidential.?
Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the
intended recipient(s) is unauthorized.? If you receive this in error, please
advise me immediately.

 - interest rate confirm.doc


Please remove me from mailing list.
Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Iona Maclean/LON/ECT on 16/11/2000 08:44
---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 15/11/2000 18:57:48
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 96939@mailman.enron.com
cc:

Subject: Enron in Europe: EU seeks comments on Enron unit's buy of Germany's
Hutzler, parts of ...

EU seeks comments on Enron unit's buy of Germany's Hutzler, parts of
Bergmann

11/15/2000
AFX News
(c) 2000 by AFP-Extel News Ltd

    BRUSSELS (AFX) - The European Commission said it invites comments
under the EU's merger regulation on Enron Corp unit MG Metallrecycling
GmbH's acquisition of control of Walter Hutzler Metallhandel GmbH and
parts of W&O Bergmann GmbH.
    The three parties all trade non-ferrous metals and scrap.
    Interested parties have 10 days to submit their comments.
    The commission has until Dec 7 to rule on whether to clear the
operation or open a 4-month in-depth investigation.

    de/lam For more information and to contact AFX: www.afxnews.com and
www.afxpress.com

Folder Name: Enron in Europe
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 90

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 11:04
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           12/06/2000 03:42 PM

To: John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Tate/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Dominion 637

FYI.   (DTI is obviously what they are calling Dominion these days.)

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000
03:39 PM ---------------------------

"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com> on 12/06/2000 08:19:48 AM
To: <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: DTI 637

We have learned the following from a talkative DTI rep:

DTI intends to  modify its existing 637 proposals.  Apparently, in light of
customer opposition, DTI intends to withdraw its proposal to shorten the
imbalance make-up period from 20 days to 72 hours and will instead develop a
new rate schedule for electric generators, who it claims are the entities
that drove DTI's need to shorten the make-up period in the first instance.


Thank you for the invitation to Utilities 2001.  Due to a prior commitment,
Mr. Skilling is unable to attend.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

Felicia Griffin <feliciag@marcusevanstx.com> on 05/09/2001 10:07:02 AM
To: "'jeff.skilling@enron.com'" <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Invitation to address UTILITIES 2001

 <<SKILLING, Jeff (ENRON).doc>>  <<UTILITIES 2001 Fact Sheet.doc>>
Felicia Griffin
Strategic Business Summits
Energy, Utilities, & Chemicals
marcus evans
Office Phone : 713.650.6007
Home Phone :281-931-3009
Fax        : 713-759-1478
E-mail   :feliciag@marcusevanstx.com
URL      http://www.marcusevans.com
***************
This message was sent by an employee of marcus evans

OUR VISION:
marcus evans is dedicated to being a strategic information partner for all
its customers by understanding what they need and want, and delivering it
through premium products and services in the format best suited to each
customer.
-----
To find out more about how you and your organization can access the very
best in "Business Information for Business Excellence," please visit us
at: www.marcusevans.com
**************

 - SKILLING, Jeff (ENRON).doc
 - UTILITIES 2001 Fact Sheet.doc


Per my voice mail.  Let me know what you think.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/16/99 12:21
PM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
11/09/99 10:48 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: JAPRO Gruppen Aktiebolag

Martin sent this message to London and Michael advised that Sullivan &
Cromwell be retained.  With respect to interest by the CFTC in  the proposed
transaction, would you agree that the same law firm advise on that issue as
well?  Makes sense to me.  Also, what is Energydesk.com LImited?  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/09/99 10:45
AM ---------------------------

Martin Rosell
11/09/99 09:47 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: JAPRO Gruppen Aktiebolag

Sara,

I hope you're doing well.  Please see my note to Paul below.  It feels a bit
like an overkill to turn directly to Sullivan & Cromwell (as suggested by
Micheal) in respect of a USD 1.25 million transaction.  The target consists
of about a dozen employees and its business is to advise local energy
companies on appropriate risk management structures and routines.  My
understanding is that the target never advises on what trading positions its
customers should take.  Could there possibly be an interest for the CFTC in
this worth investigating further?!  I believe the Energydesk.com Limited
people intend to let Japro survive and continue its current operations (as
well as serving Energydes.com's customers in the future).  Please advise!

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 99-11-09 12:59
---------------------------

Fiona Lavelle
99-11-04 16:07
To: Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sullivan & Cromwell

---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 99-11-09 13:00
---------------------------

Martin Rosell
99-11-09 12:07
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: JAPRO Gruppen Aktiebolag

Paul,

The above entity is a Swedish limited liability company which Energydesk.com
Limited intends to acquire.  According to the company's Articles, it may
prepare  analyses, give information, and engage in advisory and consulting
activities with respect to risk management, energy and power trading; carry
out strategic and other analyses and advise on strategic and organisation
development; engage in IT based consulting as well as in any other activity
ancillary with any the foregoing.  Principally, the company acts as a risk
management consultant for small and medium seized energy companies in the
Sweden and Finland.

Will the acquisition give rise to any SFA concerns?!  Despite the general
extraterritorial application of US securities laws, I'd guess an acquisition
of a minor Swedish-based operation active in the Nordic market by a U.K.
entity would be too remote to cause attraction over there.  I may check it
anyhow, but do you have a feel for the topic?

Martin


We are for the most part finished with SEC VaR.  We are missing October and
December Brent Crude Commodity Positions.  When we get these numbers we will
reissue this report, but they are not likely to be different enough from the
guesses we inserted to make a difference.

Total VaR is the highest I have seen at $92 million.

One reason is that trading commodities VaR remains very high at $66 million
(though it is down from the $81 million of November).

The other reason is that trading securities VaR is by far the highest it has
been at $63 million.  Merchant Assets (with a VaR of $29 million) and total
return swaps (with a VaR of $56, up from $24 in November) are at all time
highs.

Bacchus and Riva (both originated in December) conspired to increase total
return swap VaR.  Nevertheless, the biggest culprit is Cerberus (a fixed for
EOG shares swap we put on in November).  Cerberus contains ten million
unhedged shares of EOG.  The value of the shares increased from $42 in
November to $55 in December, raising VaR substantially.

Regards,

Eugenio


sorry so late

Fletch


Sorry guys.  I'm still working on the February invoice to CES.  I estimate
that everyday this invoice does not get out cost Enron about $4,000 a day.
Feel free to call my boss Scott Neal about the problems you are having.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 09:46
AM ---------------------------

Wade R Price
03/13/2000 09:33 AM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas

John Singer told me these two producers' deals expired 12/31/99.  We will not
need these set up.

Producer   Pipe  Status

Burkland, Richard  CPA  Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up

Burkland, WIlliam S  CPA  Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up

What is the status on these producers ?  I have invoices and I need to pay
these ASAP, especially Questa (they are calling).

Questa Petroleum  CPA   Deal  213088 set up with meter number per 9911 pay
statement.  Production statement for volumes
      received from John Singer 3/8/00

Phoenix Dominion  CPA/Cipco Deal 142669  Producer invoice available for
information

T & F Operating  PennFuel Invoice in. Deal not set up. Not able to identify
which Penn Fuel (56 or 56W) on CGAS


Relative to most of the questions I answer all day, your questions don't even
count as stupid!!

Later,
Robin

Becky Pitre
02/28/2001 03:37 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Give up

No.  Vegetables and gatorade.  B
PS How many stupid questions do you get every day?  And does this count as
one or two?

Robin Rodrigue
02/28/2001 01:16 PM
To: Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Give up

I'm giving up being nice.  And answering stupid questions.  You should give
up having yogurt and gatorade for lunch.  Did you have something good today?

Becky Pitre
02/28/2001 01:11 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Give up

What are you giving up for lent?
What should I give up for lent?
B


oh.  i can't keep up with you!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

killing me, it was a joke

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:29 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

WHAT??????????

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

please do, it will save sarah the trouble of hiring someone

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you always confuse me with everything.  i think that you do that on purpose.  i'm going to kill you!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

your getting confused again

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i hate you!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

anytime

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

well thanks for your help charlie brown

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nope and nope

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

did you go work out this morning?

do you know an orthodontist in houston?


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Peter Melera <pmelera@calpine.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:55 AM
To:	'dschool@enron.com'; West Real Time Group; Beth Waters
Subject:	southpoint

 - Southpoint Gas Model.xls


Thanks for the hospitality.  I always enjoy whooping you at a little chess.
What are your plans for New Years?

love,
e

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 12/27/2000 09:17:32 AM
To: eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Good morning Son. We very much enjoyed your company  over the holidays. It is
always nice to have you spend a few nights with us. We  wish you only the
best for the New Year. May you enjoy good health, happiness  and prosperity.
Love-Mother and Dad


Hi Ben,

I got  a call from Mike, and he gave me his lawyer's telephone number.  He is
very interested in the change order, of couse.  Do I have the pay off number?

What would be a good time to talk about the ABB payment allocation with
Herman?  I really want to put that issue to be, because I don't know if we
can't put the stuff into TurboPark if we haven't taken care of it.

I'm getting GE consent to put the Coral turbines into TurboPark, if
necessary. That doesn't mean we have to, but I don't want to take any chances.

How would you feel about not having the 1000 call and just having the noon
call? That would give me time to talk to ABB, and we would be able to get the
LLC agreement back to Coral.

Thanks,

Kay


Attached are the Enfolio and GISB Spot Contracts.  Let's discuss.


Effective immediately, any out of town travel not directly related to a work
project needs to be approved in advance by me.


FYI...
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron on 12/04/2000
01:51 PM ---------------------------

Perry Frazier
12/04/2000 09:47 AM
To: Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: EOG Pronghorn

Michelle:

The intial agreement Bob presented to EOG was for $10,000, this was to cover
the cost to refurbishing the existing 6" tap.  The work order was generated
with this amount so that the R-O-W folks would intiate a Landowner
notification letter ASAP.  EOG estimated a 5 - 15 mmcfd volume and they were
to supply all materials to re-activate this point.   A scope change was
intiated and we were to supply the EFM for their meter tube,  a verbal cost
estimate to Bob in the amount of $35,000 was relayed.  A third scope change
raised the volume estimate to over 20 mmcfd, which normally means we install
additional instrumentation.  Operations at this time insisted we add the
needed equipment to the work order.  The E&C folks then put out the tighter
cost estimate of $422,000.  This included the following cost revisions:

 Chromatograph     $55,000
 H2O Monitor     $10,000
 H2S Monitor     $35,000
 EFM      $35,000
 Flow control     $34,000
 Positive shut-in     $22,000
 Flow bypass     $12,000
 Engi. CSUP, Contig.  $120,000
 Tax Gross-up   $100,000
  Total   $423,000

Call me if you have any questions, PT 3-0667.


Hello Mark --

Here is the initial list of companies for which we will likely need new
NDAs.  I believe that at least one Enron company has an NDA in place with
each of these companies already.

Ariba, Inc.
Commerce One, Inc.
EDS Corporation
IBM Corporation
i2 Technologies, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation
Oracle Corporation
PriceWaterhouseCoopers
SAP Corporation
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
TIBCO Inc.

Thanks.

-- Rex


Thanks for coming over this afternoon.  Thought I would jot down what we
heard from the meeting.  Please add, delete, modify as you see fit.

Thanks,

PK

   Provide better or equal service to Enron (accounting, applications, and
   infrastructure) at better or equal cost in the areas of accounting,
   applications and infrastructure.  This would be in the form of a
   services contract and would include the absorption of personnel into
   Accenture
   Ensure that the Enron employees understand that we are doing this
   transaction with the explicit expectation that a commercial business
   will be developed
   For assets that have the expectation of stand alone value within the
   marketplace, either separate them from this transaction or provide
   appropriate value to Enron (upfront or otherwise)
   Structure our compensation so that we are rewarded as the commercial
   business grows (i.e., this is where we make our margin not on the
   seeding Enron transaction)
   Review Accounting and IT functions to determine the components that make
   sense to be included in the scope of the Enron transaction and (or) in
   the scope of the commercial offerings (e.g. SAP, Retail, etc.)
   Perform due diligence over a two week period to further define,
   quantify, and qualify the deal
   Be ready to go asap

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


Executive Team:

By now I trust you have had a chance to review the following briefing
materials:

> Olympus Quick Tour CD-ROM
> Navigation Exercise
> Section I of the Olympus simulation manual
> Harvard Business Review articles:
1. "Introduction to Financial Ratios and Financial Statement Analysis"
2. "Assessing a Company's Future Financial Health"
3. "What is Strategy"
4. "Customer Intimacy and Other Value Disciplines"

During our pre-session meeting next week, we will be exploring in greater
detail the Olympus simulation environment. As you are aware from the agenda,
we will be immersed in the simulation over the weekend.

The following link is to an additional article from McKinsey Quarterly which
I think captures well the strategic and financial issues you'll face in the
Olympus simulation.

http://mckinseyquarterly.com/pdf/whis00.pdf?tk=:932: (you will need Adobe
Acrobat to view this article)

I look forward to meeting you next week.

Francois Thrower

Vice President
Strategic Management Group, Inc.
900 Kearny Street, Suite 750
San Francisco, CA 94109
415.956.7223


have your boy mechanic make me a market on the cal 02 $22.00 one time put.  I'll even look at the FG $20. daily puts , financially settled vs nyse. any interest?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Knock, John" <John.Knock@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Quenet, Joe
Subject:	Trusts Keeping Enron Off Balance.htm

OUCH!!!!!

ps.  Please stop cooking the books.

 Trusts Keeping Enron Off Balance.htm
 <<Trusts Keeping Enron Off Balance.htm>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

 - Trusts Keeping Enron Off Balance.htm << File: Trusts Keeping Enron Off Balance.htm >>


CES and CEM will still exist for awhile, maybe forever due to legal issues. I
wouldn't begin canceling anything as the Choice customers are still in CES's
name and we don't want any capacity returning or other problems. They should
begin to be transferred to NPC soon. Why don't you hold off for now. Larry
Friedeman (419/878-4760) is actually the last CES employee and can be reached
in his Toledo office through 3/31/01.

Chris Germany@ECT
12/12/2000 01:32 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy L Ray/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CES and CEM

I believe ENA is still agent for Columbia Energy Services and Columbia Energy
Marketing on several pipelines.  Rich Contos's (the only CES person I know)
last day is this Friday.  I left Rich a voicemail asking him if CES/CEM
should continue to exist as a legal entity on the pipelines.

As ENA, I believe I sould at least begin terminating the agency (and
liability) relationships.

Comments/questions??


Hi Louise.

We received CAD$6.5million from Enron today.  Thank you for your help.

Regards

Kenny
NGX Financial Inc


I am now officially a Blackberry addict .....

DWD
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


So, I've got you on my natural gas panel scheduled for Tuesday Nov 14th --
are you coming for any other part of the retreat? We are trying to get final
counts for meals, etc. Please let me know.

Thanks,
Delaney


Critical Migration Information:

1. Your scheduled Outlook Migration Date is THE EVENING OF : May 1st
2. You need to press the "Save My Data" button (only once) to send us your
pre-migration information.
3. You must be connected to the network before you press the button.
4. If a POP-UP BOX appears, prompting you to "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"
please  select TRUST SIGNER.
5. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal or calendar
after you click on the button will need to be manually re-added into Outlook
after you have been migrated.
6. Clicking this button does not complete your migration to Outlook. Your
migration will be completed  the evening of your migration date.

    Failure to click on the button means you WILL NOT get your Calendar,
Contacts, Journal and ToDo information imported into Outlook the day of your
migration and could result in up to a 2 week delay to restore this
information.

If you encounter any errors please contact the resolution center @
713-853-1411


Kam,

Here is the form.

Regards
Frank


Sunday through Tuesday


Start Date: 1/19/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011923.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Please find attached below the Global Markets Monitor (GMM) dated 8 June
2001.

The contents of the GMM are contained in the Executive Summary below:

? US: Legislative momentum building for price caps.  Some prominent
economists are advocates.
? Europe: ECB holds again, acknowledging that price pressures are likely to
persist over the next few months.  By setting inflation expectations above
its stated target for the remainder of 2001, the ECB has afforded itself some
flexibility in setting interest rates to combat the economic slowdown.
Europe,s manufacturing sector continues to display weakness, suggesting that
recovery of Europe,s industrial sector may be well behind the U.S.
? UK: As expected, the BOE left interest rates unchanged at 5.25 percent at
its MPC meeting this week.  The pound reacted to speculation and political
factors this week.  PM Blair,s repeat landslide victory on Thursday and his
pre-election comments renewed an old debate regarding UK,s entry into the
euro region.  The pound is too strong to join the common currency, and it
must weaken further in order to assure export competitiveness of British
manufacturers.
? Country Update - Argentina: The bond swap that closed earlier this week
buys the Argentine government time to reduce its fiscal deficit.   But the
wave of optimism following the swap of short- for longer- term debt
repayments may wash ashore if Argentina cannot meet its IMF fiscal targets
this year.  The debt exchange prompted S&P to remove Argentina,s foreign
currency sovereign credit ratings from CreditWatch on Wednesday June 6 (in
place since March 19, 2001).
? Country Update - Brazil: Brazil,s drastic power rationing plan could impact
the short-term supply of some of Brazil,s major exports, including steel and
pulp products.  Consumers must cut energy consumption by 20 percent and
Industry by between 15 to 25 percent until at least October 2001.
Credit Ratings Activity - India and Mexico:  Fitch adjusted downward its
outlook on India,s sovereign ratings to negative from stable on concerns
about fiscal policy, privatization and a deterioration in the foreign
investment climate.  S&P,s outlook for Mexico remains positive.  But, Mexico
needs to improve its public finances before the rating agency will upgrade
Mexico to investment grade.  Mexico,s foreign currency sovereign is rated
&BB+,8 one notch below investment grade.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda
and Gwyn Koepke


Here are the deal numbers for the last few days. I apologize for the delay - this is the one e-mail that seems to escape my memory every afternoon. It will (probably) NEVER happen again....

604279 - 5/8

605598 - 5/9

606783 - 5/10

Kate


I have class on Tuesday and Wednesday.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:34 PM
To: 'PP'; Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: 'Scotty'
Subject: lizzie

Speaking of dinners, Lizzie wants to come into the city and see us and have
dinner.  What nights do you have class Jeff?  I don't think we will plan it
until the first week of October.  At that point Tues and Wed are bad nights
for me.  Monday, Thursday work for you??

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Liz Sellers [mailto:liz@ctberk.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Cameron Sellers
Subject:	Re: Stand United

> 650.858.1095 (fax)
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:	Liz Sellers [mailto:liz@ctberk.com]
> Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 9:36 AM
> To:	Cameron Sellers
> Subject:	Re: Stand United
>
> Yes, this is a dark time. We are going to Chicago today and hopefully get
> back Sunday.  Next weekend would be great if you're free, I want to hear
> about your music trip.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:	"Cameron Sellers" <cameron@perfect.com>
> To:	"'Liz Sellers'" <liz@ctberk.com>
> Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 8:51 AM
> Subject:	RE: Stand United
>
>
> > I love you too.  I hope you are doing ok.  I have been pretty sad and
> > confused.
> >
> > I'd love to see you guys!!  Let me know if you come into the city.
> >
> >
> > Cameron Sellers
> > Vice President, Business Development
> > PERFECT
> > 1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
> > Palo Alto, CA 94303
> > cameron@perfect.com
> > 650.798.3366 (direct dial)
> > 650.269.3366 (cell)
> > 650.858.1095 (fax)
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Liz Sellers [mailto:liz@ctberk.com]
> > Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 8:47 AM
> > To:	Cameron Sellers
> > Subject:	Re: Stand United
> >
> > Hey there, I just want to say I love you.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:	"Cameron Sellers" <cameron@perfect.com>
> > To:	"Cameron Sellers" <cameron@perfect.com>
> > Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:24 PM
> > Subject:	Stand United
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I don't think I have ever passed on one of these emails, but I think
> this
> > > one is worth it.
> > >
> > > This came to me from a long email thread (which I have not copied
here):
> > >
> > > To all,
> > >
> > > Friday night, at 10:00 p.m. eastern time, step out your door,
> > > stop your car, or step out of your establishment and
> > > light a candle.   We will show the world that Americans
> > > are strong and united together against terrorism.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please pass this to everyone on your e-mail list.  We need to reach
> > everyone
> > > across the United States quickly.
> > > The message:  WE STAND UNITED - WE WILL NOT TOLERATE TERRORISM.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cameron Sellers
> > > Vice President, Business Development
> > > PERFECT
> > > 1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
> > > Palo Alto, CA 94303
> > > cameron@perfect.com
> > > 650.798.3366 (direct dial)
> > > 650.269.3366 (cell)
> > > 650.858.1095 (fax)
> > >
> > >


June 19, 2000

Don Nicolson
Forest Oil Corporation

Dear Mr. Nicolson:

Attached for your review is a draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement
between Enron North America Corp. and Forest Oil Corporation.

Please do not hesitate to contact me  with your questions and or comments
regarding the Agreement.

Best Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Richard, are you taking care of this?
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000 09:42 AM -----

	Garrick Hill
	10/05/2000 11:42 AM

		 To: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, tmoore@llgm.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

My comments and changes are provided in the attached.

RH

---------------------- Forwarded by Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 11:07
AM ---------------------------

Dan Lyons
10/05/2000 10:29 AM
To: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: tmoore@llgm.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

Rick, it actually looks OK to me, but I forwarded it on to Richard Sanders
and you shoul probably get his input...

                                        Dan

	Garrick Hill
	10/04/2000 04:12 PM

		 To: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, tmoore@llgm.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

Would you gentlemen be so kind as to look at this for conformity with the
previous amendments to the PPA dealing with the same issue?

Thanks -

RH

---------------------- Forwarded by Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------

Carl Tricoli@ENRON
10/04/2000 03:41 PM
To: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chuck Ward
cc:
Subject: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

---------------------- Forwarded by Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron on 10/04/2000
03:45 PM ---------------------------

Hugh Lenox <hlenox@brazoselectric.com> on 10/04/2000 09:37:23 AM
To: "Carl J. Tricoli (E-mail)" <carl.tricoli@enron.com>
cc: "Philip Segrest (E-mail)" <psegrest@worldnet.att.net>

Subject: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

Carl:
attached is the revised second extension of the draft interim tolling
agreement for the 5 MW of incremental Tenaska capacity for your review and
approval.  Please send any edits to Philip Segrest (Brazos' attorney) and me.
Feel free to thanks
Hugh Lenox

 - tenaska tolling agrmt.doc


Boyd confirmed his availability.  We expect his call at 10:30 a.m. this
morning.

Thanks!  DT

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 06/13/00 09:06AM >>>
FYI.  Is there a conference call scheduled for today, and is Boyd available
tomorrow?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 09:05
AM ---------------------------

(Embedded
image moved
to file:      From:  Gregg Penman
pic18735.pcx) 06/13/2000 07:50 AM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:  Re: Revised RM Policy

Per my voice mail, will you please take a quick look at my edits to Vlady's
draft risk management policy attached below.  I don't think any of them are
problematic, but Vlady has some concerns mainly because the base Enron
Corp. risk management policy was used as the template and therefore I am
effectively making edits to it.

I will be leaving the office today around 11:00 so I want to turn this to
Peoples before then if possible.  On any other business, I will be
unavailable from 1:30 to probably 3:00 today, but can be reached via pager
800-980-1771 or cell phone 312-925-8888 at any other time.

As always - thanks for your help.

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000
07:45 AM ---------------------------

To:   Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Re: Revised RM Policy  (Document link: Gregg Penman)

Some comments on your comments:

Section II:    I don't like the title "Commercial Development Manager" but
rather "Risk Manager"
Response:         The title Commercial Development Manager comes from the
MEH Operating Agreement.  We can amend the LLC Agreement  if necessary, but
it seems burdensome since the title is only a formality.  However, as
currently written, the Commercial Development Manager is the person
responsible for managing the daily business, i.e. similar to a desk
director.  In order to maintain control of this position, it can only be
filled by an Enron nominee and will report directly to the MEH General
Manager, Laura Luce of Enron.

Section VII:   Majority of the wording came initially from attorneys, I
would recommend confirming that.
Response:          I will run this by the attorneys.  However, from a
technical perspective, Section VII refers to employees of MEH.  No one in
the Chicago office is an employee of MEH, but rather we all remained
employees of our respective organizations.  I will ask the attorneys if we
need to limit all Chicago based employees, both of Enron North America and
Peoples Energy Resources.

Section VIII:  Who is the General Manager of MEH?
Response:          As mentioned above, Laura Luce, Vice President of Enron
North America
Is Enron North America Corp. a legal entity?
Response:          Yes, Enron North America Corp. replaced Enron Capital
Trade and Resources as the Wholesale business of Enron Corp.  Unless you
know something different, I believe that to be a true statement.

Let me know if any of my responses don't make sense or you still have any
questions.  I am still going to try to get this out by 10:00 or so.

Gregg

To:   Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:  Re: Revised RM Policy  (Document link: Gregg Penman)

Policy Comments:

Section II:    I don't like the title "Commercial Development Manager" but
rather "Risk Manager"
Section VII:   Majority of the wording came initially from attorneys, I
would recommend confirming that.
Section VIII:  Who is the General Manager of MEH?
Is Enron North America Corp. a legal entity?

Vlady.

(Embedded
image moved
to file:      From:  Gregg Penman @ ENRON
pic24074.pcx) 06/12/2000 02:03 PM

To:   Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Revised RM Policy

Vlady - As we discussed, I am attaching my revisions to your initial draft.
They are mainly cosmetic attempts to make the RM Policy terms consistent
with the MEH Operating Agreement and separate MEH from any behind the
scenes reporting or controls that ENA chooses to place on Richard/MEH.  Let
me know if you have any concerns about my edits.  I would like to send this
to Peoples end of day today.  I will follow up with Structuring to find a
body to model the underlying asset position.

Thanks - Gregg

(See attached file: MEH Risk Policy 061200.doc)


Hey Gerald-
Ryan's big birthday is coming up this Tuesday, March 27th...wanted to get
some people together for a nice dinner downtown, around 7:00.  Please feel
free to bring Barbara along too!  I still need to make reservations at a
restaurant..if you can think of any place great, let me know.  Hope you guys
can make it!

ciao!
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


FYI - this impacts EOL trades; didn't know if you were aware of these issues.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rohauer, Tanya
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 8:03 AM
To:	Radous, Paul; Nelson, Roderick; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

I think it would be a good idea for us all to get together and discuss this isssue from a legal and credit perspective.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 7:53 AM
To:	Rohauer, Tanya
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Bill
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 7:22 AM
To:	Boyd, Justin; Dyk, Russell; Shackleton, Sara; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn; Diamond, Daniel; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq, Wendi; Sharma, Shifali; Juggins, Janine; Nelson, Roderick
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

Justin,

Your solution appears to respond specifically to EOL related legal/credit issues.  However, isn't this only the tip of the iceberg?  What about non-EOL OTC trades conducted by ECTRIC traders with counterparties that want ENA as their counterparty.  From my time in London, it was always impressed upon me that there was a quagmire of additional tax and potential regulatory (SFA) issues.

Please comment.

Also, as a commercially efficient course of action, It has always seemed to me that we should attempt to "train" our couterparties to accept that ECTRIC is also a Enron Corp guaranteed sub (at least it was in the past, at their request) and somehow initially set up our contracts/ISDA to be inclusive of this vehicle.  Is this possible?  Otherwise, the permutations of various legal/credit/tax/regulatory hurdles for all manner of OTC trades becomes onerous.

Bill--

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Justin
Sent:	28 September 2001 05:43
To:	Dyk, Russell; Shackleton, Sara; White, Bill; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn; Diamond, Daniel; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq, Wendi; Sharma, Shifali; Juggins, Janine; Nelson, Roderick
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

Russell

My view would be to follow the novation route, i.e.

1.	C/P trades via EOL with ECTRIC
2.	Each trade is novated from ECTRIC to ENA, and treated as concluded under ENA ISDA Master
3.	ENA enters into back-to-back trade with ECTRIC

This does mean that the C/P must initially accept the European EOL GTCs, though if we set up a mechanism whereby EOL trades are automatically novated to ENA and treated as concluded under the ENA ISDA Master, this effectively cancels out the EOL GTCs.

Justin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dyk, Russell
Sent:	27 September 2001 23:38
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Boyd, Justin; White, Bill; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn; Diamond, Daniel; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq, Wendi; Sharma, Shifali
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

Everyone -

Our hedge fund group needs clarification on the issue of doing Brent and other European product deals w/ our hedge fund counterparties and booking them back to ENA, the entity with which all the funds have ISDAs. We just did two WTI/Brent crude oil spreads today, one w/ very large volume, and expect to be doing more such deals.

This is more than just a legal issue; it's going to impact credit and our strategy to get the funds trading on EOL as well.

As we understand it, the main legal issue is that all the funds have an ISDA only w/ ENA and not w/ ECTRIC, so they (and I assume we) want all deals and legal exposure to be w/ ENA. To satisfy both parties' desires, all European product deals must be booked from ECTRIC to ENA. Sara, from speaking to you and from Justin's response below, it seems to me that the only legal hurdle we, the funds, and our traders might face is if no trader w/ ENA in Houston okays w/ the counterparty on ENA's behalf. However, there seem to be 2 other solutions (a netting agreement and novating) that get around this. As Sara knows, dealing on legal agreements w/ the funds can be onerous and time-consuming; negotiating more paperwork is not a viable option.

From the credit side, as we understand it, the issue w/ not back-to-backing the trades w/ ENA is that the credit exposure will not be aggregated to the funds' net position in Houston and, therefore, not monitored. In other words, any exposure not sitting w/ ENA will be invisible to credit. so daily margining, etc. will  be incorrect.

From the EnronOnline side, as we see it there are a couple of issues. EOL wants the funds to trade online; an increasing number of funds also want to trade online. However, they do not want to be restricted to trading products that are only US based. Also, they would like to see more arb spread products like a WTI/Brent crude oil spread online. If neither desire can be easily met b/c we need a separate ISDA w/ ECTRIC (which potentially means, as above, more onerous and time-consuming negotiation), then it will certainly be detrimental for volume and also foresake a certain momentum that we are gaining now.

The point has been raised that the funds could trade European products if credit in London cleared them and if they were willing then to accept the general terms and conditions that pop up on EOL. We can assure you that they will not accept this.

These are the issues as we see them from the origination side. There may be other issues that we're missing from the sides that I've mentioned as well as the trading/back office side.
Regards,
Russ

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Bill
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Dyk, Russell
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sharma, Shifali
Sent:	26 July 2001 08:21
To:	White, Bill
Subject:	FW: Trades as ENA

This is what we have heard from Legal and Tax so far.  We're trying to get a list of couterparties that currently will not trade with ECTRIC and only with ENA.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Justin
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:10 AM
To:	Juggins, Janine; Beyhum, Maya
Cc:	Sharma, Shifali; Klar, Guenther; Sexton, Camille; Watt, Julie; Marsh, Jonathan
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

i agree - assuming you follow janine's approach, then no adverse UK regulatory issues will ensue

justin
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Juggins, Janine
Sent:	25 July 2001 19:29
To:	Beyhum, Maya; Boyd, Justin
Cc:	Sharma, Shifali; Klar, Guenther; Sexton, Camille; Watt, Julie
Subject:	RE: Trades as ENA

I assume that these are financial transactions. The current approach is the right one in the circumstances - i.e trade between ECTRIC and ENA, trade between ENA and third party (eg Bank of America). It is important that the trader agreeing to the deal with the third party in the name of ENA is located in Houston (they cannot agree deals in the name of ENA when located in London).  The pricing should be such that ENA is compensated for taking the credit risk with respect to the third party but otherwise all the economics should be with ECTRIC.

To avoid booking the back to back trades, a possibility would be an agreement on netting to be entered into by ECTRIC, ENA and Bank of America if all parties can get comfortable with the legal position.

Another alternative sometimes put forward is that ECTRIC does the deal with Bank of America, the contract is then novated from ECTRIC to ENA, and ENA enters into a back to back swap on the same financial terms with ECTRIC.

Note that we are currently working on a project to enter into financials through EFET LLC (arranged by EEFT) instead of ECTRIC (effective 1 November).

Regards
Janine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beyhum, Maya
Sent:	25 July 2001 14:13
To:	Juggins, Janine; Boyd, Justin
Cc:	Sharma, Shifali
Subject:	Trades as ENA

Hi

I am currently working in the London Risk group for Global Markets.

At the moment we have a number of counterparties who do not want to transact with ECTRIC but would like to do deals only with ENA (e.g. Bank of America). As a result, if a London trader wants to carry out a trade with Bank of America, he will do an internal trade with a trader in Houston and then book a trade between the Houston trader (who trades under ENA) and Bank Of America. The trades are then confirmed from the Houston office.

We were wondering about a couple of things:

Are there any tax/legal implications we should be aware of as a result of booking the trades as we do
Is there a way to approach these counterparties to get them to trade with ECTRIC (as this currently creates a lot of paperwork and administration)?

Thanks for your help
Maya


More detail than you probably want on the document I gave you at the
Doubletree....  Mike was responding to an email that Steve Young had sent
him.  Just wanted you to know that this is moving forward and that I will
coordinate the Houston side of this for now (I will coordinate London going
forward if that responsibility is given to me).  Let me know if you have
questions.

---------------------- Forwarded by Brent A Price/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 03:01
PM ---------------------------

Mike Jordan
06/28/2000 07:26 PM
To: Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Revised Operating Standards

Steve

My assessment of the next steps are as follows :-

We finalise the intial draft of the one page summary  - Action Mike/Brent to
consolidate feedback to date - to be delivered tomorrow
The one pager to be sent to all business heads commenting on John's belief (
which I think we all share ) that the Business unit head has ultimate
responsibility to ensure operating standards are met and that we aim to
provide them with a joint summary of 'status' from Commercial Support and
RAC. This summary could be reviewed by AA, but I believe the process would be
more beneficial if it is
a self assessment process
escalates judgement on material issues
capable of being monitored and repeated on an agreed frequency
complimentary to the BRM process
The timeline for thie intial feedback could be within one week - I have an
assessment from David Port to match to ours already!

As to your other questions

I will be adding two additional detail points within the required structure
definition - ie the structure must have :-

Full functionality and interfaces for market risk, credit risk and Corporate
reporting, and/or a systems roadmap for that development
Appropriate involvement in business for specialist services ( Legal, Tax and
HR )

The Operating Standards MUST only cover one page to retain the ease of
communication for them - the above definitions identify that businesses must
consider all Legal and RAC issues - and there will significant detail
involved in that - which will be defined elsewhere ( see David's separate
comments on risk reporting )

In summary I think it is best to move to publish the intial draft to
stimulate communication  - would welcome your thoughts

Mike

 - some changes  -awaiting possible additions from Brent  - if none - to be
published tomorrow

Steve W Young
27/06/2000 20:03
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Revised Operating Standards

Mike:

Is this the most current version of the proposed Operating Standards?  Since
I've been out of the office since we last discussed, I wanted to get an
update on the status.  A couple of questions:

What are the next steps?
How will this be communicated and to whom?
How do you see this being implemented to best assure it is respected?
Legal Standards are absent?  I suspect this is still in draft form and they
are to follow in the next version; however, let me know how you see legal
Standards playing into this as I believe they should be on this list as well.

As discussed, I strongly believe that a brief and clear list of "absolutes"
similar to the attachment will be most useful if first agreed by all that
need to be involved and then effectively communicated and respected by all in
EEL.  Let me know if this list is now considered representative of the views
of all that need to have input.  I suggest we meet again with a broader group
to assure this list is complete and to discuss next steps.  I have some
suggested adjustments but will get back to you by end of week with comments
or questions from RAC after we discuss this in our weekly RAC manager's
meeting.

Thanks,

Steve

Brent A Price
15/06/2000 13:28
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Revised Operating Standards


Did you send Amanda a card?


Good afternoon, everyone! Thank you for completing last week's assignments
and/or promptly communicating your status to me. This is a reminder that
your topic assignments for this week are due by the EOD this Friday,
10/26/01.

If you are unable to complete this assignment and have not already spoke
with me, please let me know an approximate time you think they will be
completed by.

Keep in mind that if you are having trouble with the ECW, you can send your
homework in an email or Word document.  Please send to
Monica.L.Brown@Accenture.com    Thanks!

Assignment Status:
Berney Aucoin: 1/2  ETC: This past Tuesday. Have still not received. /
Meeting with Berney Thursday 10am-12pm.
Andy Lewis: 1/2          ETC: This past Monday. Have still not received. /
Meeting with Andy Thursday 2-4 pm.
Mark Reese: 1/2     ETC: This past Tuesday. Have still not received. /
Meeting with Mark Thursday and Friday 3-4 pm.
Dutch Quigley: 0/2  ETC: This Friday 10/26 for past two assignments; Monday
10/29 for this week's assignment.  / Already met with Dutch this week.
Ed McMichael: 1/2   ETC: This past Tuesday. Have still not received. /
Meeting with Ed Friday 8:30 - 9:30 am.

Important Reminders:
****1. Please note in your assignments when you use additional resources
other than the BRM course material and your own knowledge. This will
significantly help us deter any copyright infringements. Thanks.
2.  Although you are ultimately responsible for these assignments, you can
ask people who work for you to help you with them. Please keep in mind that
if you choose this method, you should review the content before handing in
the assignment.

Finally, and most importantly, please keep in mind that the completion of
these assignments significantly impacts the ability of our BRM project to
stay on schedule and within budget. If you are unable to complete this
assignment, please notify me or Monica ahead of time and provide an
estimated time for completion.

Thank you and keep up the good work!

Sheri A. Righi
Accenture
Human Performance Service Line
Hartford - One Financial Plaza
Direct Dial: 860 756 2245
VPN & Octel: 765 2245
e-mail: sheri.a.righi@Accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


Quick, give me a cheap stock that looks promising.

DG


denver defense sucks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blanchard, Timothy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:14 AM
To:	LSU@ENRON
Subject:	Daily Dose

Saban's press conference
http://www.lsusports.net/article.cfm?ref=000B29A9-FEB9-1BE6-BEB9809F187EFD5C

Geaux Bulldogs
http://www.theadvocate.com/sports/story.asp?StoryID=16443

Notes
http://www.theadvocate.com/sports/story.asp?StoryID=16441

McKay's weekly article
http://www.purpleandgold.com/toc.cfm

Other news
http://www.nola.com/lsu/t-p/football/index.ssf?/lsustory/lsufoot05.html
http://www.nola.com/lsu/t-p/football/index.ssf?/lsustory/lsunotes06.html


Here's the latest IEP media push

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/01/2001 12:26 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	05/01/2001 10:52 AM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, <tmcmorrow@manatt.com>,
<Suzy.L.Rodriguez@dynegy.com>, <ppitts@wiredworld1.com>,
<mnobili@cal-lobby.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: "Powerful Ideas" Media Briefing Wednesday 10am @ Hyatt Regency

IEP will be releasing "Powerful Ideas" to the media during a press briefing
Wednesday, May 2 at 10:00am PST at the Hyatt Regency in Sacramento. ?A video
tape of the briefing will be made available if you are interested -- just let
Katie or me know and we will forward you a copy.

???????????IEP is distributing the "Powerful Ideas" report to media,
California State legislature, the California ?????
???????????Congressional delegation, and other key energy policy makers.

In addition to Powerful Ideas, IEP will be distributing the attached
collateral materials:

 ???????????????"LBJ was President When Many of California's Power Plants
Were Being Built"
???????????????"Long-term Contracts - A History of Inaction by the CPUC"

A second briefing for legislators and/or staff is planned for next week --
we'll keep you posted with details. ?

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

 - Powerful Ideas(readers).pdf
 - IEP Long Term Cont.pdf
 - Vintage Power.pdf


Start Date: 3/6/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030621.txt


Given your latest,  I want to make sure I understant what you want from me.
I am going to prepare a guaranty from Corp. to Engage US for $25m to that
covers ENA, EPMI/Clinton?

Yes?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I think everything is OK now.  I set up deals 260724 (k#B00693026471), 260689
(k# F01978) and deal 260712 (k#I00454).  I changed the end date for deal
235701 (also k#B00693026471 - unpathed) to 4/30/00 and it still shows up in
Unify for May.

Beavy, make sure you use the B*** k# with an MDQ of 9005 when you path May.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 01:01
PM ---------------------------

Richard Pinion
05/04/2000 08:12 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

I was under the impression that the new services were set up by Sylvia.  She
had discussed this several times with me in the last two weeks.  You should
only have to set up new deal tickets with the new service effective 5-1-00
and end the old tickets 4-30-00.
The new service types should be as the below example - The new service type
is no longer "Transportation", it is now "Transportation-Pathed" for K#
B00693026471.

RP

Chris Germany
05/04/2000 07:36 AM
To: Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

 What do I need to do?  Should I end the exitsting contracts effective
4/30/00 and create new ones effective 5/1/00?  Does Marlene need to create a
new type of FT rate service to make these contracts appear different ( maybe
that has already been done)?

Marlene Hilliard
05/03/2000 05:01 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

I was not aware ot the Sonat Style.  In that case, an IT request is not
necessary.

Marlene Hilliard
---------------------- Forwarded by Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000
04:58 PM ---------------------------

Richard Pinion
05/03/2000 04:48 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Diane E
Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

I have been speaking with Sylvia Campos on this.  Originally they wanted to
do this via IT request which I thought would cause some problems. Since then
they changed their minds and decided to so it Sonat style and merely create a
different service type (so as not to change historically).  To my
recollection that is the way that they were going and supposedly it was
cleared with Connie Sutton.  So this reversal does somewhat surprise me.

RP

Chris Germany
05/03/2000 02:36 PM
To: Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

Richard, according to Marlene, she needs to put in an IT request to change
the National Fuel contracts from non-pathed to pathed.  Does this sound
correct to you?

Please let me know.
chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 02:28
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Beverly Beaty                           05/03/2000 02:14 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

Per our conversation....

Bev
---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 02:14
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Donna Greif                           04/21/2000 12:44 PM

To: Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

Richard,

I trust you're on top of this.....let me know if you'd like my help!

Thanks!

dg

From: Diane E Niestrath on 04/19/2000 06:23 PM
To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

DG & RP,

National Fuel says they are 100% using the GISB pathed model type.  Our Unify
noms are non-pathed.

1) Can you look at the National Fuel invoice and verify that the accounting
area will still work effortlessly if we change Unify to pathed.
2) If we elect to change Unify's model type to pathed, let's do it just like
we did Southern Natural.  And, I would like this done for May 1 noms in
production and have the Scheduler (Beverly?) path in this new model type
manner.  We are suppose to be getting scheduled quantities in production
starting tomorrow, unless ECOM prevents it, so you'll be able to see what the
pipe expects in the pathed model type.
3) If we elect to NOT change Unify's model type to pathed, I guess we can't
ever edi this pipe unless I can figure out some clever way to join up the
noms.

Beverly, Do you think it would be a problem to start entering the upstream
k's and downstream k's when you path in Unify.  The pipe told me this is
mandatory data unless the nom is involved in the Appalachian area.  If it is
a problem, don't do, I don't want to slow you down since you have to enter
the data twice today.  If and when we do edi, we'll need the up/down k's
entered at that time.

Thanks, Diane
x3-9931

==============================================================================
=======================
Email excerpt between Diane (in magenta) and Chris Zachary in IT Dptmt at
National Fuel Gas Supply Corp (in blue) ===>

>> 3) Please confirm that your model type is always "P" pathed from noms all
the
>> way down to invoices.

    Our model type is always "P" for pathed.


17:39:23 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Hodge, Jeffrey T.'
17:39:23 Synchronizing Hierarchy
17:39:24 	   1 folder(s) updated in offline store
17:39:24 Synchronizing Favorites
17:39:24 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
17:39:47 	   33 item(s) added to offline folder
17:39:47 	   1 item(s) deleted in offline folder
17:39:47 	   1 view(s)/form(s) updated in offline folder
17:39:47 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
17:39:48 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
17:39:48 	   1 item(s) added to offline folder
17:39:48 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
17:39:49 	   2 item(s) updated in offline folder
17:39:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
17:39:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
17:39:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
17:39:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
17:39:50 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
17:39:50 Synchronizing Views
17:39:50 Synchronizing Forms
17:39:50 Done


I got a voicemail response from Jeff - he is fine with me substituting for
him on the Japan trip.


Ben:

I talked to the admissions people last week.  They had not made a decision
but said that your GMAT score is a potential problem.  You may need to
either retake the exam or somehow document any disability that would bias
the score.

I hope that this works out -- I know that you will be a great addition to
our Energy Finance Program.

Sheridan

At 01:36 PM 3/6/00 -0600, you wrote:
>
>
>Professor Titman:
>I received an e-mail from Meg Brooks in the admissions office stating that I
>would be hearing from them this week.  I hope things work out and I can be
>contributing to and learning from the program next year.  Thanks again for
all
>your help.  Hope to hear from you soon.
>Ben
>
>
>
Sheridan Titman
Department of Finance
College of Business Administration
University of Texas
Austin, Texas 78712-1179

512-232-2787 (phone)
512-471-5073 (fax)

titman@mail.utexas.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 10:22
AM ---------------------------

Patrick Hanse
10/24/2000 10:06 AM
To: Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Update network and offering values for the CE-ALTE and CE-WEC
paths

FYI
Official notice by CE to MAIN that NO Firm ATC exists from CE or Enron L.C.
to either WEC or ALT E. for time period Nov. 2000 - Nov. 2001 due to
restrictions on the Eau Clair-Arpin  flowgate.
---------------------- Forwarded by Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 09:51
AM ---------------------------

rnm <rnm@maininc.org> on 10/24/2000 09:14:15 AM
To: christopher.nekolny@exeloncorp.com, atc_interestgroup@maininc.org,
atcsc@maininc.org, cmm@maininc.org
cc: Interconnections@ucm.com
Subject: Re: Update network and offering values for the CE-ALTE and CE-WEC
paths

At 04:53 PM 10/23/00 -0500, christopher.nekolny@exeloncorp.com wrote:
>Ray,
>
>The following paths should have their firm network and offering values
>changed on the ComEd page to 0 MW for the time period of
>11/1/2000-11/1/2001.
>CE-ALTE
>CE-WEC
>RKRD-ALTE
>RKRD-WEC
>ENLC-ALTE
>ENLC-WEC
>
>The reason for this change is that while the MAIN Eau Claire-Arpin flowgate
>(that used to calculate MAIN ATC values) has positive capability, the MAPP
>Eau Claire-Arpin flowgate is posted negative for this time period. Since the
>MAPP Eau Claire-Arpin flowgate is not on the contract path for CE-ALTE,
>CE-WEC, RKRD-ALTE, RKRD-WEC, ENLC-ALTE or ENLC-WEC transactions this is a
>valid third party limit for these directions.
>
>Please ensure that the requested directions have a greater than 5 %
>distribution factor on the flowgate during the appropriate seasons prior to
>changing the posted value. For example, it is possible that the Rocky Road
>directions will not have a 5 % distribution factor on the flowgate and
>therefore the posted values would not have to be altered. If you have any
>questions please let me know.
>
>Christopher Nekolny
>
>
>***************************************************************************
******
>This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corp. proprietary
>information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright
>belonging to the Exelon Corp. family of Companies.  This E-mail is intended
>solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  If
>you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified
>that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation
>to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited
>and may be unlawful.  If you have received this E-mail in error, please
>notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and
>any copy of this E-mail and any printout.  Thank You.
>***************************************************************************
******
>
>
>


Please create a duplicate set of documents in my CA Development folder, just
changing the name to CA Energy Development II LLC.  I'll need both sets.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 06:38
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/08/2001 06:38 PM
To: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger
Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Catherine Clark/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: CA Development - revised documents

Here's a set of CA I revised docs.  If these are ok, we will get CA II lined
up as well.

I'm on the road tomorrow, but should be back in the office on Wednesday am.

Kay


yep, he's good to go.

	From:  Eric Bass @ ECT                           11/15/2000 04:01 PM

To: Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Wed . Night scrimmage/practice

did you get mauricio to play?
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 04:00 PM
---------------------------

Michael Simmons
11/15/2000 03:46 PM
To: Stephen Schwarzbach/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis
Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Goodpastor/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christopher Chenoweth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mauricio Trejo/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Wed . Night scrimmage/practice

Practice tonight at  Memorial Park,  7pm.     Meet at same place as Monday
night.

IF you were at last year's scrimmage with the aggie team, this will be at the
same location.   Hopefully, the lights will be on and the fields will be
clear.   If it is raining,  the practise will be canceled.

From downtown, heading West toward 610 on Memorial,   goto Memorial Park and
make a right at the first light.  Take this road up till you see a split in
the road with a softball and soccer field on your right hand side, and beck's
prime on the left..  We will meet at the soccer/softball field for practice.

If you  goto far, further up the road you will see the golf course on your
left hand side as well as the tennis courts...

===

If   you are interested in wagering....   here are some bets that Webb
Jennings is putting out on the 1 st game.

We spot them:  Total Bet:

9 pts   $50
15 pts   $300
22 pts   $500-$600
30 pts   $1,000

He seems to be extra confident in that he has a former Division 2A
quarterback... Drew Teamlys  (sp?).


Jeanie,

I work in the ENA gas trading dept and understand that you are our HR rep.  I
would like to speak to you briefly about a benefits issue relating to the
legal custody of a child.  Please call me at 3x7277 at your convenience and I
will give you the details.

Thanks
 Pete Keavey


FYI.  Please pass to Hedy and Bev.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001 08:06 PM -----

	Mark Palmer 07/10/2001 07:52 PM 	   To: Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard B Sanders/Enron@EnronXGate  cc:   Subject: LADWP

----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 07/10/2001 07:47 PM -----

	"Leopold, Jason" <Jason.Leopold@dowjones.com> 07/10/2001 07:32 PM 	   To: "'pat.dorinson@mirant.com'" <pat.dorinson@mirant.com>, "'mark.palmer@enron.com'" <mark.palmer@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: LADWP

=DJ LADWP, Run By Davis Adviser, Cashed In On Calif Crisis

Dow Jones Capital Markets Report via Dow Jones

   By Jason Leopold
   Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

  LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--On a single day in June 2000, the Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power, the largest municipal utility in the country,
raked in $5 million selling California surplus power for $1,000 a
megawatt-hour
- about 30 times the average price the utility charged the month before.

  That sale, reported by the California Independent System Operator and
confirmed by the LADWP in an interview last June, was one of many instances
in
which the municipal utility cashed in on California's power crisis.

  On Monday, the Department of Water Resources, the agency that has been
purchasing California's bulk power needs in lieu of the state's
cash-strapped
utilities, released a detailed report of spot-market power purchases showing
the
LADWP charged the state an average of $242 a megawatt-hour for power from
Jan.
18 through May 31 this year. That price is about $35 higher than those
charged
by most of the out-of-state generators Gov. Gray Davis has criticized
repeatedly
as price gougers.

  Potentially embarrassing for the Davis administration, however, is that
the
LADWP was formerly run by General Manager David Freeman, who in April became
Davis' top energy adviser.

  Steve Maviglio, press secretary to Davis, said Texas-based generators are
primarily to blame for the high wholesale prices that crippled the state's
two
largest utilities.

  "Anywhere they wear cowboy hats, they probably have handkerchiefs across
their
face, because they are robbing us blind," he said. "The bad guys are clearly
the
out-of-state generators."

  Freeman's trademark is a white Stetson.

  The former LADWP chief, who last September quipped that a "blind pig could
make money" under California's faulty deregulation setup, didn't return
calls
for comment.

  Freeman took a leave of absence from the LADWP in January to negotiate
long-term power contracts on behalf of the state.

     Power To Sell

  According to the DWR report, the LADWP brought in $331 million selling
power
to the state between Jan. 18 and May 31 this year.

  The LADWP, which didn't take part in the state's deregulation debacle and
which isn't under the jurisdiction of federal energy regulators, also cashed
in
throughout 2000. The utility has 7,000 megawatts of generation capacity but
only
needs about 5,500 MW to serve its retail customers, freeing it to sell as
much
as 1,000 megawatts to the ISO at prices comparable to what the generators
were
charging.

  The LADWP did so well that it was able to pay down $200 million in debt
and
will reduce its customers' rates in 2002.

  "It just shows you that enterprise is where you find it," Freeman said in
an
interview last year.

  Last July, ratings agency Fitch concluded that California's electricity
shortage provided LADWP "an opportunity for the sale of surplus power at
favorable prices which added to the municipal system's coffers."

  According to a report by the ISO, manager of the state's electricity grid,
the
LADWP overcharged California for power from May 2000 through February 2001
by as
much as $20 million. Maviglio said the state will pursue refunds from the
utility.

  On Tuesday, an LADWP spokesman defended the utility's power prices, saying
the
costs of producing electricity were extremely high.

  The ISO has estimated that the state was overcharged nearly $9 billion for
electricity sales in the 12 months ended May 2001. On Monday, settlement
talks
between state officials and generators over the refunds broke down.

  Other municipal utilities, including the Sacramento Municipal Utility
District
and private companies like BC Hydro in Canada, have also racked up enormous
sums
selling surplus power to California at the last minute.

  -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com

  (END) Dow Jones Newswires  07-10-01

  1557EDT

(AP-DJ)--07-10-01 1557EDT
:TICKER: EIX PCG SRE
:SUBJECT: EUTL CA COBO MU PETR
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones and Company, Inc.
Received by NewsEDGE/LAN: 7/10/01 12:57 PM