Please see attached.  Rob, perhaps while in London you could stop by Mark's
desk to discuss.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 11:22 AM -----

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	03/07/2001 03:45 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Summary of $ at Risk for Customs

Steve - the issue to which I believe Jane is referring in the first sentence
("confirmation of the issues which I have articulated") concern possible
paymensts made to receive informal, and favourable, guidance, on customs
issues (which informal opinions are now seemingly being reversed, formally).
In some cases such payments may still be legal.  But, subject to Jane
confirming that I am explaining this correctly (given that the communication
below is a bit cryptic), it now seems to me to be timely (as Rebecca and Jim
have apparently been alerted in London on Monday, per her note below) to
satisfy yourself that we are now clean on this issue under the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act.  The informal customs advice was obtained by Muktesh
Tyagi (spelling?), one of two people known as Sanjay's "fixers" (that should
make you fell comfortable!).  You may wish to discuss with Jane further, but
once you satisfy yourself that there is some smoke here, my thought was that
you might want to simply confirm with Rebecca that we are running the facts
to ground, so that we can satisfy ourselves that we are either clean, or need
to come clean with USG.  let me know if you need more.   thanks mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 07/03/2001
09:42 ---------------------------

Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/03/2001 04:38
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc:

Subject: Summary of $ at Risk for Customs

Mark, I have confirmation of the issues on which I have articulated concern
to you although such confirmation is verbal.  Apparently, there are more
areas that I will identify in due time.  This information was conveyed to the
Legal Team (which included Rebecca, Bruce, Sandeep Katwala and outside
attorneys) in London on Monday.   In addition, below is additional bad news.
In addition, there is at issue now the fact that the flow diagrams and import
lists do not match.  I'll forward an additional e:mail from Seethayya,
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/07/2001 10:04 AM ---------------------------

Heidi Hellmann

03/06/2001 01:39 AM

To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Robert Mathis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Chandran
Bhaskar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Summary of $ at Risk for Customs

I found out more info on some of these extraneous customs issues above and
beyond the LNG stuff:

PHASE I ISSUES
1. SPM
 (This equipment has already been imported at 22.38%, but customs is claiming
merit duty rates of 67%.)
 This is currently being evaluated by the courts.
 Total Value at Risk = $7 MM
2. "D" - Stream
 Are Bechtel's design charges of $66 MM specific to our equipment or to the
project as a whole?
 If the former, then duty of 22.38% should apply.
 Total Value at Risk = $13.5 MM  ($66 MM x 22.38%)

PHASE II ISSUES
1. Services Loading on Power Plant Equipment
 Same issue as for LNG Equipment. Currently we are paying a 10% loading on
duty into a reserve deposit to cover this.
 Total Value at Risk = $22.38 MM  ($100 MM x 22.38%)
2. LNG Equipment to be dutied at 53.8% or 22.38%?
 Think we all know this issue.
 Total Value at Risk = $56 MM (as per Risk Matrix)
3. Services Loading on LNG Equipment
 Think we all know this issue
 Total Value at Risk = $80 MM  ($149 MM x 53.8%)

TOTAL VALUE at RISK ~$180 MM - - This is WORST, WORST CASE!

Note:  There is still this issue of goods being imported under the wrong
classification.  Currently, this is preventing goods from being imported on
time, which could lead to delay claims by the contractors.  It will take me
some time to hunt down what this could cost us if the problem isn't resolved
soon.  Pavan's estimate is that it will take a month for Site to generate
accurate equipment lists and for the same to be reviewed and approved by MSEB.
Heidi


With Canada

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


fyi/review/comment
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/20/2000 05:51
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           09/20/2000 03:54 PM

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Virginia Power contract


Please handle re Paul Nelson.
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000 06:44 PM -----

	"Philo, Andrea" <andrea.philo@linklaters.com>
	09/22/2000 05:51 AM

		 To: "'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'" <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Paul Nelson has asked me to forward to you details of the agency that
organises our art collection.

Lynne Stern and Linnet Feilding
Linnet Feilding Limited
200 Goldhurst Terrace
No 7
NW6 3HL

Tel: 020 7491 8905
Fax: 020 7624 3749

I hope this is of help.

I wonder whether you could help on the following point.
Paul is coming out to Houston to speak at an Enron conference on 4 October.
Although we have received a programme for this there is no mention of the
venue. I believe it is at the Woodlands Resort and Conference Centre and
wondered whether you would be so kind as to let us have the address and also
confirm that this is where Paul will be staying.

Many thanks

Regards
Andrea Philo
PA to Paul Nelson

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________


Sources report that the bond authorization will be put to a vote today

The bridge loan financing bill will put to a vote today in the California
Assembly.  The bill would pass with a simple majority as a non-urgency bill,
meaning the bill would not take effect for 90 days.  The state would be
forced to abandon its proposed bridge loan plans.  Absent of last minute
financial rescues by Davis or a new longer bridge loan package (unlikely)
Socal could seek voluntary bankruptcy.  The main problem now will be the
waiting period for financial relief from the state through the transmission
line purchase or other assistance.


Jeff,

I've been talking with Russ Severson of the Sitara team and he will be forwarding a list to me of all the hierarchies for Sitara auto-attaching logic.  Right now GISB agreements have the lowest priority, a "3", but I want a listing of ALL priorities for our contracts so that I can ensure that the GISB will always be the last choice if there are other masters.  As soon as I have that information, I will let you know so that you can pass on the information to Louise Kitchen.  In the meantime, we are also trying to meet with Tom Engel of EOL to ensure that the EOL Profile Manager data is bridging to Sitara and Global Contracts correctly.

Please call if you have any questions.  I will let you know what I hear from Russ and Tom.

Thanks,
SBR x30569

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Theriot, Kim S.
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 5:29 PM
To:	Elledge, Susan
Cc:	Richardson, Stacey
Subject:	FW: Master Firm Agreements
Importance:	High

Just in case you have not seen this.  We need to look at the auto attachment rules for contracts.

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wallumrod, Ellen
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Theriot, Kim S.
Subject:	FW: Master Firm Agreements

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 4:34 PM
To:	Richardson, Stacey; Wallumrod, Ellen
Cc:	Kitchen, Louise; Dickson, Stacy E.
Subject:	Master Firm Agreements

Stacey and Ellen:

	In light of current circumstances, if a counterparty has both a Master Firm and a GISB, please confirm all firm physical transactions (both telephonic and EOL) under the Master Firm and not the GISB.

	Additionally, could one of you provide me a list of EOL counterparties who have a GISB contract listed as their master agreement for EOL.

Thanks,

Jeff


For the Ohio gas, we should be pulling any additional volume out of our Bank
and we will bill first of month, any thing we dont burn should be put into our
bank, MME will have to buy the bank at the end of the month anyway.

For the other Major account areas unless it is a major adjustment, I was
assuming gas daily plus transport + premium


I don't know why you never received this message!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/15/99 03:14
PM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
06/14/99 05:36 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Swap group discussion issues

Attached is a draft list of items for review.  Some of the items require
immediate document  revisions; others require policy decisions before
revising the documents.  Please edit and refine.  Mark suggested that we
confer and come up with specific recommendations.  Once we create a list,
let's try to meet on one or more occasions to discuss.  SS


You Wanna Piece of My Heart....
You better start from the start


Mike,

sorry to bother you for this again, but can you send me contact info for you and john m?

thx,
cooper


Steve:

Attached is the final draft of our response to Greenpeace's letter on climate
change.  I'd like to discuss the follwing when you get a moment --

Enron Europe PR and Government Affairs has reviewed and OK'd the letter, but
there is a debate over one sentence concerning whether we should support
"creation of enforceable, multilateral obligations" on CO2.   I've
highlighted the sentence in the attachment, and proposed language which
softens that statement a bit.   While intellectually it would probably be
impossible to have meaningful global action without enforceable commitments
by all countries, saying so outwardly (especially to Greenpeace) could be
sticking our necks out a bit too far.

Mike and I were also hopeful that you might get a chance to run this by Ken
Lay before we send -- that's your call, of course.

I'll try to reach you this afternoon to dicuss.

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541


I attended a meeting yesterday for the volleyball league.  I have entered us
in the coed E League (5-6 teams) which plays games on Thursday at 7pm or 8pm
(I have asked them schedule us for 7 pm and they said they could accomodate
us).  The league will start on April 5th for 10 weeks and playoffs after that
if we qualify.  The locations will be at various Portland High Schools, which
can vary from as close to Benson Tech to as far as St. John's.  The cost will
be about $20 per person and each person will receive a shirt.  I wanted to
get a commitment now that we have all the information in and that you will be
able to come to the games on consistent basis.  Please email Heather Dunton
to confirm.

Paul Choi


Section III:

(See attached file: 286647-SECTION 3.doc)

 - 286647-SECTION 3.doc


Season's Greetings !!

Attached are ClickPaper approvals for November 28, 2000 with GCP adjustments
in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_ENA)

Walter Guidroz@ENRON
11/27/2000 11:19 AM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noel
Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ClickPaper approvals, 11-28-00

Attached are ClickPaper approvals for November 28, 2000.  Please call if you
have any questions; thanks.

Walter


We do have a Credit Support Annex in place.  Once we sign the ENA agreement,
we will make your requests to DB.

	Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com
	12/05/2000 06:08 AM

		 To: richard.sage@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc: James.Clarry@AllenOvery.com
		 Subject: RE: ISDA Master Agreement: Deutsche

Tana,

Thanks for keeping us updated on the Deutsche negotiations.  If, as you
suggest, Deutsche can prepare a Master for the EnronCredit.com Limited
Master as the docs are on their system then this would be useful, and I will
review and comment on those.  The one thing they will need to ensure as you
mentioned is that the Master Agreement is governed by English law.  In
addition, I  am not sure if you have put a CSA in place with Deutsche, but
if you have (presumably a Paragraph 13 under the NY law CSA?) we would need
the corresponding Paragraph 11 to the English Law CSA.

Many thanks again and we look forward to progressing this matter.

Kind regards,

Clare

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Clarry, James:ICM (LN)
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 10:30 AM
> To: Godson, Clare:ICM (LN)
> Subject: FW: ISDA Master Agreement: Deustche
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Richard.Sage@enron.com@ALLEN & OVERY
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 10:25 AM
> To: Clarry, James:ICM (LN)
> Subject: Re: ISDA Master Agreement: Deustche
>
>  << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
> FYI
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 01/12/2000
> 10:27 ---------------------------
>
> From: Tana Jones on 30/11/2000 17:00 CST
>
> To:   Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Re: ISDA Master Agreement: Deustche  (Document link: Richard
>       Sage)
>
> FYI,
>
> Bill Bradford in Credit had a conference call today with the Deutsche Bank
> Credit person and I think we have come to agreement on not adding any
> specified entities to the ISDA Master Agreement.  He also discussed
> proposed credit limits for the three other Deutsche Bank masters we want
> to
> get in place (including EnronCredit.com).  I think we are done now and
> hope
> to get execution documents from them, since the documents are on their
> system.  Our intention is to then get Deutsche Bank to turn around 3 like
> masters, making any changes necessitated by change of law, and otherwise
> turn around the remaining masters quickly.  I'll keep you posted.
>
>
>
>                     Richard Sage
>                                          To:     Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
>                     11/30/2000           cc:
>                     10:52 AM             Subject:     Re: ISDA Master
> Agreement: Deustche
>
>
>
>
>
> If you do add all the entities, does that mean that we would not need to
> put in place a separate agreement for ECCL?
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 30/11/2000
> 16:53 ---------------------------
>
> From: Tana Jones on 27/11/2000 15:45 CST
>
> To:   Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
> cc:   Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
>
> Subject:  Re: ISDA Master Agreements  (Document link: Richard Sage)
>
> With respect to Deutsche Bank (""DB"), we have one credit issue remaining,
> DB would like us to add all the Enron trading entities DB trades with as
> Specified Entities under the ISDA Master Agreement and we are somewhat
> hesitant to do so, as this could potentially roll up swaps under
> structured
> loan transactions into a default under the ISDA Agreement.  Sara and Bill
> Bradford in Credit are supposed to talk to the DB Credit people about this
> remaining issue.
>
> With respect to First Union National Bank, the draft we were working from
> was so old that they agreed to look at our current form of agreement which
> was sent to them on 11/8/00 for review.  Sara is working on that with
> Susan
> Bailey, another paralegal in our Group.
>
>
>
>                     Denis
>                     O'Connell            To:     Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
>                                          cc:     Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
>                     11/22/2000           Subject:     ISDA Master
> Agreements
>                     06:05 AM
>
>
>
>
>
> Tana - can you please give me an update on where you are in the
> negotiations of the ISDA with the following counterparties and confirm
> which Enron entity you are negotiating on behalf of.
>
> Tks,
>
> Denis
>
>
> First Union National Bank
>
> Deutsched Bank AG
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>  - att1.eml <<
> File: att1.eml >>

======================================================================

This email is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20) 7330
3000 and requesting the Technology Services Helpdesk. You should not copy it
or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.

Allen & Overy
One New Change
London
EC4M 9QQ

Tel:+44 (20) 7330 3000
Fax: +44 (20) 7330 9999
General Email: Helpdesk@allenovery.com
www: http://www.allenovery.com

Allen & Overy is a solicitors' partnership.  A list of the names of partners
and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the above
office.  The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign lawyers.

======================================================================


Start Date: 1/5/02; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010518.txt


Carl,

Don want to have following assumptions:

- ENA deals with just energy piece, not anciliary service portion.
- Gas curve: Transco zone 6 (may be bundled one)
- Power curve: East hub of NY power pool
- EES short load is fixed

For valuation;

   Revenue from serving load (to make 12% IRR for an IPP)
+ Spread option value
+ ICAP
-  Fixed expenses
= NI

Jin


He didn't say

-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Jason Bass
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party

did he tell you if he was coming or not?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass [mailto:JBass@stdauto.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party
Ya, I talked to him he said he would email you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Jason Bass
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party

I haven't heard back form Tom yet, but everyone else is going.
Can you get in touch with him?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass [mailto:JBass@stdauto.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party
So who all is coming and isn't?  I know Jeff can't make it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:18 PM
To: 'Bass, Eric'
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party
That sounds like fun.  The date of the party is January 19, 2002.
Invites
Dad
Scott
smacfarland@gpch.org
Jeff Scott
jayandem@earthlink.net
Brian Lisenby
I will get that one
Ramiro Castano
lqcolombo@aol.com
Tom Fielder
tommybomb88@hotmail.com
Billy Brown
Billy.Brown2@COMPAQ.com

I think that is all.  I will finalize in the next couple of days.
Would you please send me your address?
Thanks,
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [<mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com>]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:35 PM
To: jbass@stdauto.com
Subject: Bachelor Party
<http://www.txtreasure.com/>

what do you think about this.

and you still need to send me a list of invitees (with e-mail)   and the date of the party.

-e

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


The check is in the mail...no really...!!!

Actually, I meant to give it to you at breakfast last weekend, but I have no
memory.  Do you want to run Saturday again.  Do the Rose Garden run?

	MONTALBANO.HOLLY@heb.com
	05/09/2000 03:49 PM

		 To: TANA.JONES@ENRON.COM
		 cc:
		 Subject: Plane ticket

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deftab720{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss MS Sans
Serif;}{\f1\froman\fcharset2 Symbol;}{\f2\froman Times New Roman;}}
{\colortbl\red0\green0\blue0;} \deflang1033\pard\plain\f2\fs20 Tanaaaaaa,
\par  \par Don't forget to send me a check for $185.00 for your plane ticket
to Dallas.  You can mail it to me at 13919 Queensbury Lane, Houston, TX.
77079.  \par  \par You should see my Hollyhock trees - they are in full bloom
- my back yard is awash in purple and white. \par  \par See yah!! \par  \par
Holly \par }


I will  take a look at the Sandals Resorts and let you know.  I am not talking  about real cheap.  I told them that a vacation would be around $2000  for just 5 days and additional wedding costs will be at least $1000 if not  more.  I guess their ideal budget would be around $3000, but if this is not  feasible then they can budget for more.

Thanks  again!
Ashley  Landry
EnFORM Technology,  LLC
Office: (713) 350-1933
Fax: (713) 438-1933
Email: ashley.landry@enform.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Marilyn Liebling  [mailto:Marilynl@TASTG.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:17  PM
To: 'Landry, Ashley'
Subject: RE: Help with wedding  plans!
Now  that there is non-stop service to Jamaica,  it is a good  choice.   Many of the resorts have wedding plans offered.  I  know for a fact that the Sandals Resorts have wedding/honeymoon plans.   November will be cheaper than January any place tropical.  Check the  internet for Sandals weddings.  I doubt that it will be cheap, but the  resorts that offer weddings are your more upscale  destinations.

Marilyn
-----Original Message-----
From: Landry, Ashley  [mailto:Ashley.Landry@enform.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001  1:57 PM
To: marilynl@tastg.com
Cc:  jason.wolfe@enron.com
Subject: Help with wedding  plans!
Hi Marilyn,
I am helping a friend plan an "away"  wedding.  I was wondering if you knew of or would suggest any resorts  that have full wedding services that we can start looking at.  They  want simple wedding and are going to invite their close family and friends,  but are not sure who will be able to come yet.  I am thinking it will  probably be about 10 people.  They definitely want something tropical  and probably all-inclusive would be best.  I had a friend who got  married in Playa de Carmen, but I'm not sure which resort.  I was  thinking somewhere in Mexico would be good but definitely not Cancun.   They are on a tight budget because they will be paying for it  themselves.  So here are the details about what we are looking  for:
Tropical All-Inclusive Resort
Round trip airfare
Travel date between November 2001 and January  2002 (what time is cheaper?)
Wedding Services including someone to perform  the ceremony, flowers for the bride, photography, location for ceremony  (possibly on the beach), location for reception for about 10 people (can  be restaurant at the resort)

I couldn't discuss this on the phone because it  is my coworkers boyfriend and I who are planning it and she sits right next  to me.  If you could give me a list of resorts we will look over them,  narrow it down, and then get back to you.  Thank you so much for your  help!
Ashley  Landry
EnFORM  Technology, LLC
Office: (713)  350-1933
Fax: (713)  438-1933
Email:  ashley.landry@enform.com


Greetings from Amazon.com.

We thought you'd like to know that we shipped your items today,
and that this completes your order.

Thanks for shopping at Amazon.com, and we hope to see you again soon.

You can track the status of this order, and all your orders, online by
visiting "Your Account" page at http://www.amazon.com/your-account.
There you can:
        * Track order and shipment status
        * Review estimated delivery dates
        * Cancel unshipped items
        * Return items
        * And do much more

The following items were included in this shipment:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Qty      Item                           Price  Shipped  Subtotal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
2        Leading the Revolution         $17.97  2       $35.94

---------------------------------------------------------------------
               Item Subtotal:  $35.94
         Shipping & Handling:  $5.47
                       Total:  $41.41
--------------------------------------------------------------------

This shipment was sent to:

 Mark E Taylor
 1322 Rutland
 Houston TX 77008

via UPS Ground (3-7 business days).

For your reference, the number you can use to track your package is
1Z53X86X0361588205.  You can refer to our Web site's Help page or:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/tracking.html

to retrieve current tracking information.  Please note that tracking
information may not be available immediately.

If you've explored the links on "Your Account" page but still need to get in
touch with us about your order, e-mail us at orders@amazon.com.

On your next visit to our Web site, come see what's New for You by
clicking the link on the right-hand side of our home page, or by
visiting this URL:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/recs/new-for-you/new-for-you.html/ref=
cs_ae_nfy

We've selected an assortment of new releases, recommendations, and
informative articles that we think would appeal to you.

Thank you for shopping at Amazon.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazon.com
Earth's Biggest Selection
orders@amazon.com             http://www.amazon.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Attached is a link to Enron's California Solutions website.  It is a secure
place on the Web that we can use to share resources and keep track of our
efforts to manage the energy crisis in California, New York, Washington, DC
and the West.  At this site, you will find:

A list of the "Members" who retain either reader or author access to the site
A Task Page that identifies deliverables and who is responsible for
completing specific projects
A Calendar with the details of conference calls, speaking engagements,
hearings, and other public meetings that are pertinent to the energy crisis
News and articles
A compilation of Enron Position Papers regarding the energy crisis
A Library of documents addressing the energy crisis that have been published
by external sources
Anouncements
Updates

The site has been recently updated and I think you'll find it is a useful
place to archive information and documents that are related to our National
Energy Campaign.  Please bookmark the site, and feel free to add information
to the site that you wish to share with your colleagues.  If you would like
to add or remove someone from the site or, if you have questions about the
site, please contact Elizabeth Linnell or Janel Guerrero.

Your log-in id is: first name <space> last name(lower case)
Your password is: first two letters of your first name*first two letters of
your last name.

Example:
joe smith
jo*sm

http://quickplace-2.interliant.com/QuickPlace/californiasolutions/Main.nsf?Ope
nDatabase


Thanks for confirming the destruction of tapes.  Mark


I sent the information to Lee this morning.  You were copied on the e-mail.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzwater, Loftus
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:44 PM
To:	Harrison, Tyrell
Subject:	THermo

Tyrell:

Let me know if you need to look at this another way.  I think this is what you were asking for.

Loftus Fitzwater
Enron North America
Gas Structuring
713-345-3697