At least some reporters/columnists get it.  This is a column from the
National Post in Canada.

Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Priggish and piggish in California
Mark Steyn
National Post
A hurricane devastated Tristan da Cunha last month. It swept in May 23, but
no one heard about it till the other day because it damaged the island's
radio link to the outside world. The storm blew sheep into the chilly South
Atlantic, killed many cattle, damaged every single home on the island,
demolished the hospital and community centre, blew the roof off the radio
station, and wrecked the Albatross, the only pub in the only village,
Edinburgh of the Seven Seas. For a week after the storm, the entire island
was without electricity.
And no one in the rest of the world knew a thing about it! Not the island's
colonial masters in London. Not the Governor, who doesn't actually reside
there but prefers to live 1,260 miles away on St. Helena, Tristan da Cunha's
nearest neighbour. (St. Helena is Manhattan to Tristan's Weehawken, New
Jersey.) Plunked in the ocean midway between Argentina and South Africa,
Tristan da Cunha is the world's most isolated human settlement. Its contact
with the rest of humanity is limited to one annual visit from a British
supply vessel, plus the occasional cruise ship, which anchors offshore when
it's safe to do so.
Now that's living off the grid.
The East India Company won a charter to settle Tristan in 1658, and it's been
a Crown colony since 1834, populated by a handful of families from the
Scottish borders. There are just seven surnames on the island: Glass, Green,
Hagan, Lavarello, Repetto, Rogers and Swain. All 290 of them turned up in
London 40 years ago, when the island's volcano erupted and they were
evacuated to the Imperial capital. In the roaring traffic's boom, midst the
glitter of one of the world's great cities, the islanders voted to return
home -- though even getting there was tricky, as their landing dock was
covered in lava. Today the colony is virtually self-sufficient in food and
has a reasonably thriving economy based on crawfish and selling its
commemorative postage stamps to overseas philatelists.
London has offered o75,000 to repair the communications equipment and pay for
a new hospital. (You can build a hospital for under 75,000 quid? Amazing.)
Otherwise, the islanders are just doing what they usually do: making the best
of things. While they're waiting for the new hospital, they've arranged for a
South African fishing vessel to ferry out a second-hand X-ray machine when it
sails next week.
Now, consider by way of contrast, the inhabitants of what George W. Bush
amusingly calls "the great state of California." Once upon a time, California
was, like they say of Tristan da Cunha, "the furthest thing," at least in
terms of the North American continent. Today, with a population the size of
Canada's, it's one of the world's largest economies, the home base of
America's biggest industry -- entertainment. But inside many a studio
vice-president is a Tristan da Cunha islander trying to get out. Deep in
their hearts (assuming, for the purposes of discussion, that studio
vice-presidents have hearts), they share the same rugged virtues as the
Tristanians, though they prefer something a little better than a $100,000
hospital and they've no desire to scrape a living from catching crawfish, but
if the pool boy wants to have a go up the deep end he's welcome to try.
And therein lies the contradiction. California's self-inflicted energy crisis
has exposed the preposterousness of poseur-conservationism in a booming
economy. Which state has the most rigorous conservation program? California.
Which has the lowest per capita electricity consumption? California. And
which state is panicking at the prospect of a summer of rolling blackouts? By
now impeccably progressive California should have learned the hard way that
conservation is not a viable policy for a non-stagnant economy.
Instead, a rolling blackout here, a rolling blackout there, and they're
running around like headless chickens. Governor Gray Davis is lashing out at
everyone in sight -- Bush and Cheney are "irresponsible," the power
generators are "unconscionable" -- no, wait, they're "snakes" and "robber
barons." And how do you treat unconscionable robber snakes like Ken Lay, CEO
of Enron Corp.? "I would love," said Bill Lockyer, California's
Attorney-General, "to personally escort Lay to an 8x10 cell that he could
share with a tattooed dude who says, 'Hi, my name is Spike, honey.' "
As the state's Attorney-General, Mr. Lockyer cannot summarily sentence
citizens to anal rape, but no doubt, once the guy's convicted, he can make
some quiet recommendations as to appropriate cell mates. Fortunately for Mr.
Lay, as chief exec of the world's largest energy trader, he doesn't live in
California, he lives in Texas. Indeed, very few of the folks the State of
California would like to sic Spike on are within their jurisdiction:
Doubtless the taxpayers of British Columbia, whose BC Hydro has been living
high off the hog on California's woes, could also use a little light buggery,
but I can't see a Canadian court approving extradition. Nevertheless, in a
state that's over-regulated, bans new power plants and is addicted to price
caps, Mr. Lockyer has ingeniously managed to come up with yet another
disincentive for anybody in the energy business to relocate to La-la-land.
California bought into the soft-eco Sierra Club illusion -- that somehow one
could be a conservationist, with no consequences for one's economic
well-being. To put it in terms Californians can understand: Suppose you build
a house out in the desert. But you don't want to buy a car, because that's
bad for the environment, isn't it? So instead every morning you call a
taxicab in the city to drive out, pick you up and take you into the office.
Not only does it have no environmental benefit but there's no point bitching
and whining because the driver charges you a fare that bears no relation to
the cost of gas.
Yet that's what Governor Davis and the Anal Attorney are demanding: price
caps. Through its own incompetence, California is wholly dependent on energy
generators and distributors from other jurisdictions. But it expects those
companies to forgo the interests of their own stockholders and service
California -- i.e., Hollywood and Silicon Valley -- as an act of public
welfare. "A 500% profit is swine-like, piggish and totally unreasonable,"
says Medea Benjamin of the California human rights group Global Exchange.
She may have a point, but, if California's going to institute price caps,
they might like to start closer to home. After all, if Enron's board members
don't really need those big salaries, do Paramount's or Universal's? I mean,
sure, Ken Lay has an easy job, but how difficult is it for an exec honcho in
Century City to sit at a desk and greenlight another John Travolta flop every
couple of months? I mean, surely, the guy could do the job on, oh, $25,000 a
year. And that'd be good for conservation, 'cause he'd have to give up the
Merc and the Cherokee and the LearJet and take the bus. And how about
Travolta? Instead of $20-million per picture, maybe he could get by on just
two or three and the remaining $17-million could be put into those renewable
energy projects he's so keen on. I mean, a $20-million salary isn't just
swine-like, it's piggish, right?
Since its entry into the Union, California has had what we 19th-century
imperialists call "responsible government." Tristan da Cunha doesn't. Yet its
community leaders are behaving far more maturely and responsibly than
California's. Gray Davis is acting not like the elected Governor of an
American state but the appointed Governor of a Crown colony, feverishly
cabling head office to send somebody out to rescue him. You're on your own,
man. And, if California conservationists find rolling blackouts too onerous,
they should try spending a week in the dark, cut off from the outside world
and knowing that, even when the radio starts working again, it's going to
take months for the second-hand X-ray machine to arrive.


Enron has sold Houston Pipeline Company.  Read about it in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
Find out who else from Enron is part of the Bush transition team
Read how Jeff would solve the problems in California
Enron helps draft a new master bandwidth trading agreement
Awards, awards...and more awards

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz January 19, 2001."


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 20, 2001 5:00pm through April 23, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:        ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/20/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  8:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 4/20/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  6:00:00 AM PT
 Fri 4/20/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  2:00:00 PM London
Outage:  SysAdmiral Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  SysAdmiral Users
Purpose: SysAdmiral terminal server icons on General Cluster will not be
available due to maintenance.
Once the maintenance is completed the icons will point to the new 2.3.11
production and development environments.
Backout:  None
Contact(s):  Rusty Cheves  713-345-3798

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:       SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


I'm taking Dylan's and Mark's stuff, adding a bit, and putting it into memo
format.  As I recall in class, he doesn't expect or want us to turn in
answers to questions, per se, just a 4-page (or so) memo.  I have that
right?  I'll circulate the memo later today, or first thing tomorrow in the
AM.

Best,
Jeff


i'm back in office. jeff


Jay,

Yes he is.  I'll get something scheduled.

Liz

Rajelpy@aol.com on 08/08/2000 10:36:47 AM
To: gwhalle@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Houston next week - Jay Perl

Greg:
I will probably be in Houston first part of next week. Are you around?
Jay


Correct again....This deal has been changed. Also, I've forwarded these last
two e-mails to Bill Williams III, Real Time manager, who can talk to these
guys about using correct counterparty names in deal entry. In the future if
you see errors or discrepancies in deals done by the Short Term West Hourly
desk, please send the e-mail to Bill and myself. This will hopefully be a
more direct way of nipping the problem in the bud.

Thanks for your help.

Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
12/13/2000 05:04 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 476642

Sorry to keep bugging you.  I think this deal is in as the wrong TransAlta.

Thanks!
Melissa


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

June 1, 2001 5:00pm through June 4, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001

This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network.  While this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services, this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities.  No network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown.  The actual physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th floor Data Center.

Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th 2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT). Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network testing has completed.

If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at 713-410-0642 for more information.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     9:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Enable routing on new router ecn-34-cor-ccr1
Environments Impacted:  ENS
Purpose: This router will be used to connect to the new building
Backout: remove routing on the router.
Contact(s): 	Scott Shishido    713-853-9780

Impact:  AEP
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Shutting off the internal link to 1201 Louisiana
Environments Impacted:  AEP
Purpose: Company occupying that space has been sold.
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
                        Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

Impact:  ENS/GCO
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001    thru Wed 7/4/2001
Outage:  HPL migration to AEP
Environments Impacted:  GCO
Purpose: Sites sold
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
		Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  Internet
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    8:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     8:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Reboot Enron.com edge routers
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: Regular reboot to prevent such problems as memory corruption. Intermettent disruption to last about five minutes.
Backout:
Contact(s): 	John Shupak          713-853-7943
		Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Corp Notes
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  cNotes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: Make sure server comes up.
Contact(s): 	Trey Rhodes  (713) 345-7792

Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EI Notes Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EI Local/Domestic/Foreign Sites
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: N/A
Contact(s): 	David Ricafrente    713-646-7741

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


You guys probably don't remember this (I didn't until I checked the file) but
there were a couple of exhibits to the Transwestern Gallup contracts that we
left to be attached to the final contracts after execution.  My recollection
is that we were in such a hurry to get the Compression Service Agreement
signed and sent to FERC that we left a couple of these things to do later.
Now that we have the FERC order, I want to get these contracts off my desk
and off to Corporate Records or whereever original contracts go to die.   On
my originals, I'm missing Exhibit B to the CSA (which is the CDEC Rate
Schedule No. 21),  and Exhibits A and C to the O&M Agreement.

Susan, please coordinate with Gerald to get these exhibits in our respective
files and we can send these contracts off to the central rathole and be done
with it.  Thanks to you all.  DF


Andrea Stevens

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stevens, Andria
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	McConnell, Mike; Hannon, Kevin; Lavorato, John; Pina, Rafael
Cc:	Pieper, Kalen; Chapman, Kay; Phillips, Cathy; BROWN, CAROL; Hillis, Kimberly
Subject:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 Interview with Faye Worthy

I have attached the interview schedule/evaluation form and resume for the exploratory interview on Tuesday, June 12, 2001 with Faye Worthy. Please let me know if  any conflicts arise in scheduling as the candidate is traveling from Columbus, Ohio on Monday, June 11, 2001.

A hard copy of Faye's resume will be delivered to your offices on Friday, June 8, 2001.

Thank you,

Andria Stevens
EES Executive Referrals


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<title>E-mail Promotion</title>

        The 2002 C320 Sport Wagon

See it now at your Mercedes-Benz Dealer Web site.

It's the latest sport wagon to hit the road from Mercedes-Benz. And what a wagon it is.

The youthful C320 Sport Wagon isn't just one step ahead when it comes to versatility. It's also ahead of its class when it comes to luxury, performance and safety. And all at a value that's certain to surprise, starting at $39,115.

        See it now at your Mercedes-Benz Dealer Web site. You'll find a range of features designed to make shopping for a C320 Sport Wagon as enjoyable as driving one, including:

  · 360° views and running footage

  · Competitive comparisons and full specs

  · A printable e-brochure

  · The ability to build your own C320 Sport Wagon

  · The ability to request a test drive

  · The ability to make a sales inquiry

It's all there at your Mercedes-Benz Dealer Web site.

To locate the Mercedes-Benz Dealer nearest you, please enter your zip code below.

        <FORM action="http://www.mbusa.com/email_campaign/cwagon/redirect.jsp?src=STONEAGE" method="post">
            <INPUT type="text" name="ZIP">
            <INPUT type="submit" value="Submit">
        </FORM>

	      Your email address
		  has not been given to any Third Parties. You have been selected to receive this
		  e-mail because you indicated you wanted to receive information and special offers
		  from StoneAge.com. If you no longer prefer to receive these special offers, or
		  feel this email has reached you in error, please click here to
		  remove.


I forwarded this to Derrick and Haedicke. Why dont you send one out to every
other GC. Thx.


Dear Valued Ameritrade Customer:

Thank you for using the wire request feature on our website.  I have
submitted your withdrawal request in the amount of $5700.00.  Federal
Securities regulations require that stock and bond trades settle three
business days after the transaction.  Per your instructions to send the funds
upon settlement, your wire will be processed on 01/29/2001, settlement day
for these transactions.

If you would like the funds requested sent to you prior to the settlement
date, Early Settlement fees will apply.  The fee structure is as follows:

$25.00 + $0.35 per $1000.00 per day

The $25.00 is a one-time charge per wire request.

If you have further concerns or inquiries, please contact the Wire Team
through Customer Service at (800) 669-3900 or (402) 970-5805.

Thank you for choosing Ameritrade!

Sincerely,

Damon Hynes
Customer Service/Wire Specialist
Ameritrade, Inc.

Original Message Excluded:
-------------------------
case 2082605


NEWS FLASH!!!!

The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that there cannot be a
nativity scene in Washington, D.C. this Christmas. The Court ruling is not
based on the seperation of Church and State  Simply put, the  Court felt it
could not find three wise men and a virgin in the Nation's capitol. Finding
enough Asses to fill the stable would not be a problem.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 05:13 PM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
02/01/2001 05:02 PM
To: mday@gmssr.com
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: Further Public Record Act Request from the San Jose
Mercury News to the EOB

Please deal with this.  I never saw a document from you on the last public
record request.  Please advise.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 05:12 PM
---------------------------

Alan Comnes
02/01/2001 04:41 PM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: Further Public Record Act Request from the San Jose
Mercury News to the EOB

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 02/01/2001 04:41
PM ---------------------------

"Fuller, Don" <DFuller@caiso.com>@caiso.com> on 02/01/2001 04:40:15 PM
Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <SHapp@caiso.com>
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:

Subject: CAISO Notice: Further Public Record Act Request from the San Jose
Mercury News to the EOB

Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

On January 24 the EOB received a further Public Record Act request from the
San Jose Mercury News for information that may include information provided
by the ISO to the EOB and may include information subject to ISO tariff
section 20.3.  Attached please find the Public Record Act request and the
letter from the EOB forwarding the request to the ISO.  Market Participants
wishing to provide comments to the EOB on the request should submit such
comments directly to the EOB.

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - Public R.pdf


Mark, what are your thoughts on attached from EOL perspective?  Envera's
proposal is inconsistent with Enron legal policy on punitive, consequential,
lost profit type damages.  Please let me know your thoughts.  Thanks, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron on 01/11/01 09:59 AM -----

	"Harvey, Dean" <dharvey@velaw.com>
	01/11/01 09:56 AM

		 To: "Dobin, Nora (Enron)" <nora.dobin@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Linking Agreements - Indemnity Issue

-----Original Message-----
From: Pond, Jonathan [mailto:JPond@hunton.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Alderden, Emily; Stockbridge, Edward T; 'Harvey, Dean'
Cc: 'michael.a.robison@enron.com'; 'douglas.s.friedman@enron.com';
'suresh.raghavan@dealbench.com'; 'Biff Pusey (E-mail)'; 'Mike Giesler
(E-mail)'; LeBey, Daniel
Subject: Linking Agreements - Indemnity Issue

Envera still has an issue with the indemnity offered under the Linking
Agreements.  As we discussed in our conference yesterday, Envera cannot
permit DealBench or EnronOnline to disclaim consequential damages that may
be payable to a plaintiff in a trademark infringement action.  Envera is not
seeking to recover Envera's own lost profits or consequential damages, just
those that Envera must pay to a plaintiff in an infringement action.

Envera's request is that a statement be added to the indemnity section
clarifying that any damages awarded in a final judgment or paid in
settlement of an infringement claim be deemed "direct" damages.  Dean stated
in yesterday's e-mail that DealBench, as a matter of policy, does not agree
to such requests.

After some discussion among Envera business people, Envera is uncomfortable
with the position taken by DealBench and Enron on this issue.  If DealBench
and Enron are not prepared to stand behind the trademarks that they so
vigorously protect in the Linking Agreements, then Envera is not prepared to
shoulder the risk that Envera would be required come out of pocket for a
plaintiff's lost profits.  Envera is not able to control the risk that
EnronOnline and DealBench have chosen infringing trademarks, other than by
not establishing the links at all.

If the concern of DealBench and EnronOnline is that they could be required
to pay punitive damages that arise from Envera's misuse of the trademarks,
this eventuality is already covered in the indemnity provision.  Neither
party is required to indemnify Envera for infringement claims based upon any
use of the marks not expressly authorized under the Linking Agreements.

I have attached drafts of the two Linking Agreements, marked to show the
language that Envera would like added to Section 4(c).  Please review the
proposed changes and let me know whether they are acceptable to DealBench
and EnronOnline.  If not, Envera will need to consider whether it will even
establish the links.

Regards,

Jonathan

Jonathan R. Pond
HUNTON & WILLIAMS
Riverfront Plaza, East Tower
951 E. Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
DIRECT DIAL:  804 * 788 * 8598
FAX: 804 * 788 * 8218
MOBILE:  804 * 647 * 7871
EMAIL: jpond@hunton.com

This message is confidential and subject to the attorney-client privilege.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail
and destroy the message and any attachments.

 <<11 Jan DealBench Linking Agreement - H&W.doc>>  <<11 Jan EOL Linking
Agreement - H&W.doc>>
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

 - 11 Jan DealBench Linking Agreement - H&W.doc
 - 11 Jan EOL Linking Agreement - H&W.doc


We now have a self-calculating cuts template.  There are two, one located in
P:/RealTime/Cuts_Worksheet   and one located in P:/Scheduling/Cuts_Template.

These are both write protected, but once you add your changes just do a save
as and save as the date. This will allow you to calculate the cuts to your
schedules very quickly, and verify their accuracy immediately. Spaces are
provided to record paths, tag numbers and enpower deal numbers.  If you try
this and think of improvements, please don't hesitate to get with me.

Also,  the extra SW transmission is now shown on the Available Transmission
Capacity sheet in P:/Real Time.  Lisa will be updating the SW portion, and
Mike will continue to do his updates in the NW portion.  The left column has
been frozen to allow scrolling without losing the hour designation.

One last thing:  To have our CISO schedules on hand during these times,  just
go to the lotus dbase, do a sort by global ID, expand the day you wish to
see, and right click your mouse.  Select Print, and then in that dialog box
select "Print View."    This will work with any dbase view you need in Lotus.

c


AGA for 10/6/00 is 62


----- Forwarded by Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 02:09 PM -----

	John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com
	11/14/2000 02:02 PM

		 To: Lauren.Goldblatt@enron.com, kelly.kimberly@enron.com
		 cc: vsharp@enron.com, Rob.Walls@enron.com, Stephanie.Harris@enron.com
		 Subject: Comments to New Security and Human Rights Policy

Lauren and Kelly:

I attach the consolidated legal comments to the  proposed Security and
Human Rights Principles, as well as  copies of your overview memo and of
the Principles themselves.

In summary, the note says we see no major issue legal that cause us to
advise Enron not to endorse the Principles, but that we do see a number of
significant matters that Enron should consider before it makes a decision
to endorse them.

There are two other items in addition to those mentioned in the note:

   In regards to e-mails we exchanged yesterday regarding the fact that
   these Principles are targeted at the extractive industry peer group that
   Enron tries to distinguish itself from and is largely exiting, I
   understand that Vicki will be contacting Kelly to discuss your
   suggestions  on differentiating Enron from those industries.
   It is not clear whether the decision to endorse the Principles must be
   made by the full Enron board or some level short of the Enron board.  I
   think Vicki will be discussing that with Rob.

Please call if you have any questions.

 (See attached file: LEGAL COMMENTS TO HR PRINCIPLES - 14NOV00.doc)
(See attached file: overviewmemo1.doc)

(See attached file: corp_resp__20_Sept_[2].doc)

 - LEGAL COMMENTS TO HR PRINCIPLES - 14NOV00.doc
 - overviewmemo1.doc
 - corp_resp__20_Sept_[2].doc


Before his exec agreement can be finalized, Michelle needs to know the date
the Form B (Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Rights) was signed by
Barry.  Can you provide me with that date?

Thanks,

Jane


We would really like some UBS signs for the trading floor - can we take the ones you have here?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


This morning, we announced an offer to acquire London-based MG plc, one of
the world,s leading metals marketers, for $446 million.  We have been
monitoring the global metals market for several years, and we believe that
now is the right time to enter this $120 billion market.  We are confident
that our successful business model, which we have proven in the natural gas
and electricity markets, gives us a tremendous advantage in a market that is
undergoing fundamental change.

Our offer to acquire MG plc has been unanimously recommended by MG plc,s
board of directors, and we expect to close the transaction by early third
quarter of this year, following shareholder and customary regulatory
approvals.

MG plc is a leading independent company in global non-ferrous metals trading
and marketing and the only such company that is publicly traded.
Headquartered in London with major offices in New York and Frankfurt, MG plc
has 330 employees in 14 countries.  It is the world,s leading copper
merchant, one of the top three merchants of copper concentrates and nickel,
and a leading European merchant of recycled metal.  Other products that MG
plc markets include aluminum, lead, tin, zinc, brass and stainless steel.

This transaction provides Enron with access to new customers and enables
cross-marketing opportunities.  We plan to sell Enron energy products to MG
plc customers and offer bundled products combining metals and power
outsourcing.  Enron will help producers and consumers manage the risks
inherent in volatile raw materials and energy markets, and we will improve
commodity prices for both buyers and sellers.

MG plc,s existing market-making capabilities and market knowledge provide an
immediate platform upon which to overlay Enron,s proven ability to offer
innovative e-commerce-enabled services to commodity-based industries.  Our
new metals business will be integrated into our wholesale business by Enron
Europe CEO John Sherriff, who will work closely with Enron Net Works CEO Greg
Whalley.


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
02:00 PM ---------------------------
From: David Parquet on 09/25/2000 11:03 AM PDT
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PG&E Questions

My responses to one set of PG&E questions would be as follows.  Dean is
answering the other one and will send back to you directly.

* What is Enron's intent re: continuing involvement?  PG&E is
concerned about any potential requirements that they might be required to
either purchase fuel from Enron or engage Enron as the power marketer.

RESPONSE: Enron is very flexible re continuing involvement:  scheduling
coordination, fuel supply, power marketing, etc.  We are also flexible re the
time period and the terms of the continuing involvement.  Whatever
arrangement is developed would be mutually beneficial.

* What is status of EPC negotiations.  Will they be required to engage
NEPCO as the EPC contractor?  Does the EPC contractor have control over the
turbines?

RESPONSE: o EPC negotiations are complete with NEPCO.  Contract has not been
executed, but has been "put on the shelf" awaiting decision on successful
bidder for the purchase of the Pastoria project from ENA.  Successful bidder
and NEPCO will each have the option of executing the EPC agreement.

  o Successful bidder is under no obligation to engage NEPCO.

  o West LB has control of the turbines.  They can be assigned either to the
LLC or to ENA.  (If assigned to ENA, it was because the successful bidder for
the Pastoria project did not want the turbines with the acquisition.)  If
assigned to the LLC as part of the acquisition, the LLC can then assign the
turbines to the ultimate EPC contractor.

* They also questioned whether there would be any "agricultural
restrictions"?

RESPONSE: The project site is presently under a Williamson Act contract to
maintain agricultural use in exchange for lower taxes.  Last week, the Kern
County Board of Supervisors voted to cancel the Williamson Act contract to
allow for industrial use, which started a 180 day public comment period.
However, the Governor has on his desk a bill for signature that would reduce
the public comment period for the cancellation to the same time frame as the
request for rehearing period for the CEC Final Decision.  (The Governor has
until 9/30 sign the bill and is expected to do so because of the overwhelming
support of the bill in the Assembly and the Senate.)  The cancellation will
be contingent upon a successful CEC decision and a payment of a Williamson
Act cancellation fee.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Quenet, Joe
Sent:	Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:59 AM
To:	Sturm, Fletcher J.; Benson, Robert; Dorland, Chris; Arora, Harry; Stalford, Robert
Subject:	FW: 07:33am EDT 15-Aug-01 Prudential Securities (C

CHECK THIS OUT.....

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Knock, John" <John.Knock@ElPaso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Knock+2C+20John+22+20+3CJohn+2EKnock+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:33 AM
To:	Quenet, Joe
Subject:	07:33am EDT 15-Aug-01 Prudential Securities (C

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************
 - Prudential.doc


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	SGA Meeting

Date:		9/26/2000
Time:		9:00 AM - 10:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


<<ab_1890_bill_960924_chaptered.url>>

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/95-96/bill/asm/ab_1851-1900/ab_1890_bill_960924_c
haptered.pdf

 - ab_1890_bill_960924_chaptered.url


Today I called spoke to the Jillian Segall National Commissioner of the
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). In brief I have
arranged a meeting  with her and staff handling our application next
Wednesday afternoon. Paul I have foreshadowed that we would be willing
withdraw and resubmitt our application as they had indicated. Howver we would
like to meet them to explain directly to them what our position is


print
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richter, Brad
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 12:22 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	FW: EOL Fees 2002: Enron Global Markets Presentation

Some materials for our EOL budget discussion this afternoon.

Thanks,
Brad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pacheco, Leonardo
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 12:00 PM
To:	Richter, Brad
Cc:	Palmer, Mark S. (ENW); Mujumdar, Ravi
Subject:	EOL Fees 2002: Enron Global Markets Presentation

Attached please find the presentation for EGM

Leonardo Pacheco
EnronOnline LLC
Tel:  (713) 853 9938
Fax: (713) 646 2126
Leonardo.Pacheco@enron.com


We have a discount on Tenn k#2891, Z0 and 500L to Carnes for Oct 1-31st, up to 20,000 per day.

Rate = $.12


I will be out of the office on business from Tuesday February 5 through Friday February 8 .

I will be unable to access my email during this time but please feel free to contact me either on my cell phone at 917 523 6132 or  through  Jennifer Puca at 212 713 3989.

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


Update as of 10/15/01.

Thanks,
selma


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	meet w/ vlady 2888  re: VAR reporting

Date:		12/20/2000
Time:		3:30 PM - 4:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Marcie,
 In my view, the Planning issue is more of a matter for an RTO tariff than
for the WIO agreement.  When we created the RTGs (WRTA, SWRTA, NRTA) we put
that kind of language into the agreement because there were no open access
tariffs.  We no have Order No. 888 OATTs except for a few parties, so I am
not sure that we need to retain the transmission access language in WIO.  The
specific language could create a conflict because the RTO tariff may have
different provisions which don 't match based on a division of responsiblity
for lines between those on congested paths and lines within local areas.

 On ADR, I have heard all the old arguments an believe the WRTA/NRTA approach
is better.  They both lead to quick resolution and have been show in NRTA's
case to have resolved real disputes relatively quickly.  The approach
advocated by SWRTA tries to avoid using FERC as the final decision maker in
matters of transmission access.  The SWRTA process takes months before you
can complain and then you get a mandatory outcome, even if the arbitrator
fails to understand FERC requirements.  This could put you between a rock and
a hard place, if there is a conflict.  We should resist the SWRTA approach,
and vote for a short mediation, followed by either party being able to go to
arbitration, the "last best offer first" style of arbitration and an
appealable arbitration decision to the FERC.

Steve

From: Marcie Milner@ENRON on 09/05/2000 03:20 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES,
Susan_J_Mara@enron.com, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: WIO Bylaws - Feedback Requested

Following are two issues that are currently being debated to which I am
requesting feedback in order to submit an Enron position prior to the
Steering Committee being held this week.

Planning:  Parties are lobbying language to disclose all planning projects
permitting anyone to join provided the interested party pays the incremental
cost i.e. TO #1 wants to build a 2000 MW Kv line and maintain rights to all
2000 MW, TO #2 wants to increase the lines capability by 400 MW and retain
rights to all 400 MW.  In this scenario, TO #2 would have to pay all costs
associated with upgrading the line.  The argument is that in an RTO world
this scenario is irrelevant, however, I see this as a potential seams issue.

ADR:  Parties are lobbying to change language from mandatory binding
arbitration with limited appeal to FERC TO mandatory binding arbitration only
if both parties agree with the ability to bypass and go directly to FERC.
(All entities with the exception of SWRTA currently enforce the former.
SWRTA additionally has a provision that calls for a pre-arbitration peer
review.)

FYI:  Class definitions are such that WAPA qualifies for membership in only
one class and the regions do not fit the affiliate definition.  Therefore, if
each region wants to join and have one vote per region in said class, they
must each pay $5000 and the larger entity must pay the net energy to load
ratio of total load with the larger region collecting pro rata compensation
from the other regions.

Any comments you have are appreciated.

Marcie


Bill, FYI.  You have both David Porter and me working on that day shift.
Either we need to let the night shift know that they need to come in an hour
and a half early, put someone else on that day shift, or change the
itenerary.  Let me know when you have this resolved.  Thank you for your
attention to this matter.


CGLF
I created deal 530445 (purchase from New Power at CGLF + $.06) to bookout
with deal 380571.

CGAS
I created deal 503451 (sale to New Power  at CGLF + $.06 + Variable from CGLF
M/L to Leach).  Volume = 1,278
Deal 380492 is a sale to New Power, price = NX1 + .28, Volume = 2,683 day
Please bookout the 2 sale deals with deal 503453 (purchase from New Power at
CGAS IF + $.0125).  Volume = 3,961 day.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Chris


Will do.  Sue Mara, my colleague in the SF office, will join the call.  Tom,
what's your number?

Best,
Jeff

	Pat Shortridge
	07/19/2001 07:42 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: phone call tomorrow

Actually, why don't you call Tom Briggs here first and you can conference in
with Connie.

Best,

Pat


Hi Jeff-

How are you?  I haven't quite melted yet, but I am coming close. It has been very hot here, but I know I can't expect to get any sympathy from someone who lives in Texas.

Thank you for thinking of me in regards to Sen. Schumer's fundraising.  What is his fundraiser's name?  I may know her or of her at least.  The political fundraising world is pretty small.

I am not sure what to make of the sunglasses comment because via email I can't tell if you were joking or serious.  But in either case, the answer is no.

Anyway, thanks again for thinking of me.  Hope all is well with you.

 -Jennie


Second Quarter Refund Interest Rate
FERC announced the latest quarterly interest rate applicable to refunds and
carrying charges for second quarter 2001. The rate is 9.02 percent, dropping
from 9.50 percent in the first quarter

http://cips.ferc.fed.us/Q/CIPS/MISC/NR/NR01-18.000.TXT

Notice of Fourth Interstate Public Meeting Scheduled
Today FERC announced the fourth in a series of public meetings to explore
strategies for public participation in the planning process. This seminar
will be held in Seattle, Washington on April 26. Staff will brief the first
three seminars in Albany, chicao and Tampa and discuss problems that surfaced
as well as potential solutions.

http://cips.ferc.fed.us/Q/CIPS/MISC/M_MS/MS032701.000.TXT


Richard:

I don't know if you were copied separately on this message.  Can you send a
letter after Thanksgiving?  The first payment should come due the first week
in December.  Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 03:34 PM -----

	Douglas S Friedman
	11/22/2000 01:20 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Oct 20 conversation with Bob Lampo of Salerno

Looks like 2/3 of the way down on pg. 2 he clearly says we have a deal
pending the LC, a requirement which we later waved.

Doug
---------------------- Forwarded by Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
01:18 PM ---------------------------

Alan Engberg
11/22/2000 11:44 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Oct 20 conversation with Bob Lampo of Salerno

Sara, here's the transcript of a conversation with Bob whereby I mistakenly
inform him that he needs to post a $240k LC and he doesn't object.  Please
comment on how useful this will be to our efforts to enforce the deal.  Also,
as mentioned previously, I called Bob a week ago, left him a message and
haven't heard any response.  Should I try again?????  What are our next
steps?   (I'm pulling more tapes to try to find the conversation or message
in which I tell Bob that he's actually got $250k of credit).

Thanks,
Alan


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99
03:00 PM ---------------------------

Benjamin Parsons
12/17/99 05:45 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Absence

Vince,

I've had to go home early today, as I'm not feeling too well. Hopefully I'll
be back on Monday, so we can talk then.

Ben


Knudsen, Sheila A. would like to recall the message, "Reply Requested: Do You
Code Or Approve Invoices?".


Attached is a Price Schedule, which follows the approximate structure we
discussed the other day. As previously mentioned, I aggregated some things
where it seemed to make sense to do so.

I have highlighted the Bridge Setup sections. I boosted this level from what
we discussed.

Also, I think our Auctions charges are too high. Suggest we drop the
per-Auction charge down to $2,000 (cost is less than $1,000).

Dave


Parties to the Gas Strategy OII, I.99-07-003

PG&E is providing the attached "Real-Time Access Methodology Survey - Status
Report" pursuant to the CPUC Decision Approving the Comprehensive Settlement
As To PG&E In The Gas Strategy OII, Decision 00-05-049.  PG&E will send the
final report on or before January 12, 2001.

Randy Litteneker
PG&E Law Department
(415)973-2179

 <<Gas OII Survey Letter.doc>>   <<Gas OII Report on Access Survey.doc>>

 - Gas OII Survey Letter.doc
 - Gas OII Report on Access Survey.doc


This should be fun!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:17 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	RE: Energy West Coverage

Energy West has been covered by the Canadian Desk for the last 5 years..... I think dave priced a 10 year deal lower than what Canada had already priced the deal at... so we have two issues, 1.  coverage (ownership), 2. coordination efforts.

No, canada is not part of the union but at times the thinkness of the 49th parallel ocelates.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Cc:	Fuller, Dave
Subject:	RE: Energy West Coverage

What was the issue?  Montana is ours.  I did a deal with MPC Storage earlier in the year and am also working with Industrials up there.  Did Montana secede the Union and join Canada?  You think it would have made the news!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:23 PM
To:	Le Dain, Eric
Cc:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	Energy West Coverage

Eric, I received your message on discussions with Energy West.  Firstly, I was unaware of any pricing discussions or notional prices being put out to the customer and I have not discussed with Dave, or Mark Whitt. With that being said, I am sure Dave is out marketing products and services to all of the Utilities in the PNW.

With out a doubt, we need to discuss this effort as it relates to and creates conflict or duplicate coverage.. I look forward to the discussion and did try to call you earlier today to discuss directly.

BT


OK.  DF

Kathy Ringblom
05/04/2000 09:00 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: printer

Between $600 and $700.


Nancy,

Here's the book request I spoke with you about.   This also needs to be added
to the AGG-GAS, AGG-GASIII, AND AGG-GASIV portfolios.  Please include as a
separate portfolio named trader under the Lavorato Other region.

Please let me know when this book is set up.

Thanks,
Robin


so where are we going


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Team Leader Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		10/23/2001
Time:		2:30 PM - 3:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


As requested, I investigated potential government approvals or potential
political interventions if India assets/investments are sold.  My
understanding from the India CFO (in response to my query about approvals
necessary for any sell-down like we are working on for Dabhol) is that it
depends to whom we sell.  If we sell to an Indian company, then the Reserve
Bank of India (RBI) must approve taking dollars out of India.  If a sale is
made outside India, no Indian approvals are necessary.  There are, however,
many other approvals that would need to be obtained -- specifically from
lenders and counterparties pursuant to project documents.  I have not
analyzed these financial-related approvals.


Hi, Felicia.

As I told Cindy, there is no easy way for me to determine which contracts I have done in the past are for corporate versus other business units.  I simply don't organize my documents that way.  Instead, I do a numeric list of documents, and the documents are identified by employee name, as opposed to business unit.  As of now, I have over 4500 documents on that list.  So, I can't easily pull out corporate agreements.

I can say that most of the corporate agreements I have done have been for RAC or Finance, so Sheila Walton probably has kept track of them somehow.  The others most likely were at VP or above level, so I think they have been captured by corporate comp.

I hope that gives you information, even if it doesn't provide exactly what you are looking for.

Let me know if you have questions.

Michelle

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges.

	Felecia Acevedo/ENRON@enronXgate 05/21/2001 04:09 PM 	   To: Sharon Butcher/ENRON@enronXgate, Kriste Sullivan/ENRON@enronXgate, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy R Ward/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Employment Contracts

In my new roll in Compensation, I am trying to get comfortable that we have all the Employment Agreements up-to-date in the Corporate Compensation Database so that we can ensure that payments are made in a timely matter and contracts are looked at for renewal in the same timely manner.  What would help us tremendously is if we could get copies of all the contracts you produce for Corporate employees both VP and above and below VP so we can make sure they are entered into the Compensation Database.  Mary Joyce's group enters the VPs and above but Cindy Ward and I are responsible for making their payments under the contracts.  Because of this, I want to make sure we have copies and do not miss anyone.   As always, your help is very much appreciated!

Thanks!

Felecia
ext. 39815


Received test message.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Greg Piper @ ENRON                           05/17/2000 12:03 PM

To: gwhalle@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Test

Test message from Tech Support via Greg testing his address book.  Please
reply with a click on the reply button.

Thanks,

Vel A. Watkins
Tech Support


FYI.  Andrea look at the clipping on CGC.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/03/2000 07:46 AM ---------------------------

Alexandre Bueno
29/02/2000 06:00 PM
To: Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pablo
Acevedo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bernardo
Andrews/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diego
Hollweck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J
Shoobridge/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gabriela
Aguilar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rodolfo
Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julian
Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cristian
Folgar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marta
Ortiz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Luis
Juarros/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Guillermo
Canovas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Clipping 02/29/2000

BRAZIL: MEETING OF MAE ON FEBRUARY 29TH
Gazeta Mercantil, 29 Feb 2000, p. A-15:-
 Companies which are part of the MAE (Electricity Wholesale Market) will hold
a general meeting on February 29th 2000 with the intention to discuss the new
rules for the operations of the sector.
The companies will discuss, for example, one resolution taken on February
25th which concedes credits for the companies and other which increases the
number of available plants to operate in peak periods.

BRAZIL: RURAL ELECTRIFICATION IN RIO DE JANEIRO
Gazeta Mercantil, 29 Feb 2000, p. a-13:-
 According to the president of the Brazilian electricity company Cerj,
Alejandro Danus, the company has already informed the Brazilian Ministry of
Mining and Energy that it will join the rural electrification program 'Luz no
Campo' of the ministry, expecting to sign the contract in 15 days.
The two other electricity concessionaires which operate in the state of Rio
de Janeiro had already agreed to join the program, but Cerj took longer to
reach the same decision because it was analysing which technology should be
used in its concession area. Cerj is expected to invest R$ 60mn in the area,
mainly in the north of the state, benefiting 30,000 families which still do
not have access to electricity.

BRAZIL ANGRA-2 TO START OPERATIONS
Folha de S.Paulo, 27 Feb 2000, p. 1-14:-
 The Brazilian National Nuclear Energy Commission (Cnen) established the
deadline of March 15th 2000 to release an authorisation for the operation of
the nuclear power station Angra 2 of the Brazilian state-owned nuclear
electricity company Eletronuclear in the Brazilian city of Angra dos Reis
(state of Rio de Janeiro).
With the authorisation, Angra 2 can begin to charge its reactor, testing and
inspecting safety after that. If everything is successful, the power station
ill begin to generate electricity in the end of April 2000 and generating
1,245 MW 3 months after that. But this time may be much longer, considering
that the previous nuclear power station Angra 1 took more than 3 years to
operate commercially after the charging.

BRAZIL: ELETROSUL IN POWER TRANSMISSION LINE
Gazeta Mercantil, 29 Feb 2000, p. a-13:-
 Groups which want to compete in the tender for the construction of a power
transmission line between the Brazilian cities of Campos Novos and Blumenau
(state of Santa Catarina) must be qualified until March 15th 2000.
The company Eletrosul, a subsidiary of the Brazilian state-owned electricity
company Eletrobras, will compete in the tender alone (not participating in
any consortium).
Eletrosul signed pre-contracts with the companies ABB (Asea Brown Boveri) and
Siemens which will conduct works and supply equipment (Eletrosul will operate
the lines).

ARGENTINA: IMPACT OF POWERGEN'S ACQUISITION
El Cronista Comercial, 29 Feb 2000, p. 15:-
 With the acquisition of US-based LG&E Energy for US$ 5.4bn, UK-based
PowerGen will become the owner of stakes in Argentina's gas distribution
companies Gas Natural BAN, Distribuidora de Gas del Centro and Cuyana. LG&E
has 1mn clients in Kentucky, Virginia, Spain and Argentina.

BRAZIL: FREE IMPORT OF FUEL POSTPONEMENT
O Estado de S.Paulo, 26 Feb 2000, p. b-1:-
 The Brazilian executive-secretary of the Ministry of Treasury, Amaury Bier,
declared on February 25th 2000 that the Brazilian market of oil and
derivatives will be opened only in January 2001, and not in August 2000, as
predicted in the Oil Law.
The federal government will propose the change of this date to the Congress
through a draft law.
The reason for this measure, according to Bier, is that the oil sector is
currently too confused. He also informed that the government did not create a
substitute for the Specific Price Parcel (PPE) yet. The PPE is the part of
the fuel price which maintains the oil account.

BRAZIL: INCREASE OF FUELS PRICES
O Estado de S.Paulo, 26 Feb 2000, p. B-1:-
 The executive-secretary of the Brazilian Ministry of Treasury, Amaury Bier,
announced on February 25th 2000 that the following fuels will have their
prices increased on March 1st 2000:
- gasoline and diesel oil by 7% in the refineries and
- kerosene for aircraft by 23%.
According to government estimations, this increase of gasoline prices in
refineries will result in an increase by 5% in gas stations, for final
consumers. The increase of the kerosene will result in an increase by 3% in
flights tickets prices.

BRAZIL: OIL SPILLAGE IN PARA
Folha de S.Paulo, 29 Feb 2000, p. 3-8:-
 The Brazilian subsidiary of the American oil company Texaco will keep
cleaning the river Para probably by the first weekend of March 2000.
The company already removed 25% of the total 1.9 tonnes of fuel BPF spilled
in the river.

ARGENTINA: LOWERING TAXES, IMPOSSIBLE FOR NOW
El Cronista Comercial, 29 Feb 2000, p.2:-
 Officials at the Argentine Revenue Service warn that it would be impossible
to lower taxes for now. Many are requesting that fuel and value added taxes
be lowered but this would mean US$ 2bn less in government revenues. When
considering the government fiscal deficit, it is easy to understand why the
government must look toward solutions that would increase tax collection and
not reduce it.

ECUADOR: EDC PLANS TO EXPLOIT GAS
El Comercio (Ecuador), 29 Feb 2000, p. 1:-
 The firm, Energy Development Corporation (EDC) announced that it will invest
some US$ 100mn in a project to exploit natural gas in the coastal zone of
Ecuador. Drilling is scheduled to begin in May 2000 with production entering
the first phase in the 3rd quarter of 2001 with 32mn cubic feet daily, enough
to generate 204 megawatts of electrical energy.

SPAIN: REPSOL YPF'S STRATEGIC PLANS
Cinco Dias, 29 Feb 2000, p.5:-
 Spanish oil operator Respsol YPF, which has broken its agreement with
Spanish electricity operator Iberdrola, intends to operate in the electricity
market in countries where it is active in gas business, particularly
Argentina, Brazil and Spain.
On the other hand, negotiations between Repsol YPF and Italian oil operator
ENI (Ente Nazionale d'Idrocarburi) are taking place.  In any case, eventual
agreements will be implemented when ENI's privatisation process will conclude.
Additionally, the Spanish group expects to reduce nearly Euro 520mn costs by
2002, mainly through workforce reduction.

ARGENTINA: SALE OF CGC
La Nacion (Argentina), 29 Feb 2000, p. 2/1:-
 The investment banks Dresdner Kleinwort Benson and Dresdner Bank are close
to a contract to take charge of the sale of a 51% stake in the Argentine oil
company Compania General de Combustibles (CGC), owned by Sociedad Comercial
del Plata (Soldati group).

BOLIVIA: CHACO SEEKS NEW CLIENTS
Los Tiempos (Bolivia), 29 Feb 2000, p. on line:-
 Bolivia's oil and gas firm Chaco announced it is concentrating its efforts
on gaining new clients for the gas it plans to trade from Bolivia to Brazil.
The firm will place in Brazil 30mn cubic metres of gas per day during a
20-year term, according to the contract it signed with the Brazilian
government. Early in 1999, Chaco was negotiating a contract with Pan American
Energy which failed due to the opposition of YPF, the Argentine oil company.

BOLIVIA/BRAZIL: COMPANIES TO TRADE GAS
El Diario (Bolivia), 29 Feb 2000, p. on line:-
 Bolivia's oil and gas company YPFB informed eight firms will export some
9.1mn cubic metres of gas per day from Bolivia to Brazil during the year
2000, according to the terms fixed in the contract signed between both
countries. The amount to be traded per company is as follows:

Firm     Cubic metres per day

Andina     1.86mn

Chaco     1.52mn

Tesoro (British Gas)   1.43mn

Vintage     1.36mn

Perez Companc   1.21mn

Petrobras    0.8mn

Maxus     0.67mn

Dong Won    0.25mn

TOTAL     9.1mn


Attached to this email is a report on the
Transmission Constraint Projects in MS Excel
format.

In addition, ERCOT System Planning Technical
Operations staff is currently examining and
preparing three project proposals for review by
ERCOT Stakeholders. These projects are:

Paris-Anna & Anna-NW Carrollton 345 kV Lines
Venus-Liggett 345 kV Line
San Miguel-Laredo-Bates-Edinburgh 345 kV Lines

We are planning on submitting these projects
separately for stakeholder review via TAC and the
ERCOT Board starting in March or April.

ERCOT is leading five regional planning groups
(North, South, Houston, West and Central) to
determine additional actions needed to resolve
transmission constraints.

We hope this information is helpful and your
cooperation in this matter is appreciated.

Kenneth A. Donohoo, PE
Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
ERCOT
2705 West Lake Dr.
Taylor, TX 76574-2136
(512)248-3003, FAX(512)248-3082

 - TransmissionConstraintProjStatus01_2001.xls


Any update?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Foster, Chris H.
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 3:07 PM
To: Sacks, Edward
Subject: RE: Sierra Pacific - EOL

Ed:

Can you give me an update?

C

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sacks, Edward
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Foster, Chris H.
Subject: Sierra Pacific - EOL

Done.  Effective tommorrow.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/21/2000 11:14 AM -----

	JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	12/21/2000 10:34 AM

		 To: "'jdasovic@enron.com'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: A.00-11-038, SCE's Amended Rate Stabilization Plan Applicatio n

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony.Archer@sce.com [mailto:Anthony.Archer@sce.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 8:06 PM
To: kmccrea@sablaw.com; michael-briggs@reliantenergy.com;
defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil; rcsstl@cdmnet.com;
mbrubaker@consultbai.com; alex.goldberg@williams.com;
barbara_klemstine@apsc.com; jlyoung@sempra.com; napedersen@jonesday.com;
athomas@newenergy.com; lgurick@calpx.com; douglass@arterhadden.com;
reedba@sce.com; kmelville@sempra.com; jbarthrop@powersavers.com;
btenney@landuselaw.com; gackerman@wptf.org;
furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com;
bfinkelstein@turn.org; jjz@cpuc.ca.gov; imoosen@gralegal.com;
glsg@pge.com; phanschen@mofo.com; scarter@nrdc.org; epoole@adplaw.com;
chilen@llgm.com; jbennett@gmssr.com; jkarp@whitecase.com; lys@aelaw.com;
rick.counihan@greenmountain.com; kfyip@seiworldwide.com;
wbooth@booth-law.com; brbarkovich@earthlink.net; berry@apx.com;
scottst@mid.org; jeff@jbsenergy.com; blaising@braunlegal.com;
jsole@caiso.com; jweil@aglet.org; abb@eslawfirm.com; abb@eslawfirm.com;
pstohr@dbsr.com; jtachera@energy.state.ca.us; kmills@cfbf.com;
mpa@aelaw.com; dws@keywaycorp.com; jazayeria@sec.com;
LVanWagenen@sempra.com; jskillman@prodigy.net; risom@ix.netcom.com;
fosterbc@sce.com; rschmidt@bartlewells.com; luluw@newsdata.com;
ell5@pge.com; rbw@mrwassoc.com; rmccann@cal.net; karen@klindh.com;
huse@eesconsulting.com; mer@cpuc.ca.gov; nhc@cpuc.ca.gov;
dlf@cpuc.ca.gov; jeh@cpuc.ca.gov; jmh@cpuc.ca.gov; msw@cpuc.ca.gov;
meb@cpuc.ca.gov; sfc@cpuc.ca.gov; dhungerf@energy.state.ca.us;
mjaske@energy.state.ca.us; jbushee@sablaw.com; kmccrea@sablaw.com;
rogerberliner@bcjlaw.com; rcsstl@cdmnet.com; anchau@shellus.com;
keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com; napedersen@jonesday.com;
athomas@newenergy.com; fchristi@arterhadden.com; hchoy@isd.co.la.ca.us;
lisa_g_urick@calpx.com; douglass@arterhadden.com; randy_britt@mayco.com;
cohnap@sce.com; costac@sce.com; lehrerjm@sce.com; glwaas@calpx.com;
uwua@worker.com; dbb@sdcity.sannet.gov; jleslie@luce.com;
mshames@ucan.org; kmelville@sempra.com; btenney@landuselaw.com;
ronknecht@aol.com; furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil;
mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; bfinkelstein@turn.org;
theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us; jjz@cpuc.ca.gov; chrisw@greenlining.org;
chrisw@greenlining.org; jnnc@chevron.com; jlondon@gralegal.com;
phanschen@mofo.com; epoole@adplaw.com; rschmidt@bartlewells.com;
chilen@llgm.com; eke@aelaw.com; jsqueri@gmssr.com; jbennett@gmssr.com;
bloomje@la.whitecase.com; pbray@newpower.com;
rick.counihan@greenmountain.com; edwardoneill@dwt.com; smoss@hooked.net;
whe1@pge.com; ssmyers@worldnet.att.net; pat.williams@dhcmail.com;
wbooth@booth-law.com; mgomez1@bart.gov; askaff@energy-law-group.com;
pjpowerlaw@aol.com; rrcollins@n-h-i.org; patrickm@crossborderenergy.com;
tomb@crossborderenergy.com; brbarkovich@earthlink.net;
pjmuller@ricochet.net; pmcdonne@wenet.net; berry@apx.com;
chrism@mid.org; jeff@jbsenergy.com; cmkehrein@ems-ca.com;
jweil@aglet.org; abb@eslawfirm.com; dcarroll@dbsr.com;
dkk@eslawfirm.com; smutny@iepa.com; jtachera@energy.state.ca.us;
kmills@cfbf.com; aorchard@smud.org; mpa@aelaw.com; mhg@hetrading.com;
dws@keywaycorp.com; cread@steptoe.com; jogg@jhenergy.com;
peter_fox-penner@brattle.com; sdefrawi@efaches.navfac.navy.mil;
ad046@detroit.freenet.org; mbrubaker@consultbai.com;
georgeperrault@msn.com; foxba@sce.com; lawcase@sce.com;
picketse@sce.com; jsilva@edisonenterprises.com; LVanWagenen@sempra.com;
jbarthrop@powersavers.com; foothill@lmi.net;
furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com;
fosterbc@sce.com; ktilton@gralegal.com; oshirock@pacbell.net;
natutt@duanemorris.com; j3m9@pge.com; derkp@newsdata.com;
luluw@newsdata.com; RJP2@pge.com; ell5@pge.com; jyf1@pge.com;
mrh2@pge.com; NXK2@pge.com; rrh3@pge.com;
ConsumersFirst@worldnet.att.net; gtbl@dynegy.com; joe.paul@dynegy.com;
honest@compuserve.com; emitchel@angnewspapers.com; rbw@mrwassoc.com;
difellman@energy-law-group.com; dmarcus@slip.net; jeff@hmhresources.com;
ed@apx.com; scottst@mid.org; rmccann@cal.net; blaising@braunlegal.com;
melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com; twetzel@thermoecotek.com;
Slayman@energy.state.ca.us; jdh@eslawfirm.com; lmh@eslawfirm.com;
ddavie@hesinet.com; rliebert@cfbf.com; karen@klindh.com;
cpeyton@sacbee.com; thaines@smud.org; huse@eesconsulting.com;
mer@cpuc.ca.gov; ang@cpuc.ca.gov; ctd@cpuc.ca.gov; dlf@cpuc.ca.gov;
fua@cpuc.ca.gov; jlo@cpuc.ca.gov; kok@cpuc.ca.gov; kth@cpuc.ca.gov;
kim@cpuc.ca.gov; gig@cpuc.ca.gov; rtf@cpuc.ca.gov; raw@cpuc.ca.gov;
car@cpuc.ca.gov; ztc@cpuc.ca.gov; dwrlegal1@water.ca.gov;
ath@cpuc.ca.gov; LKristov@energy.state.ca.us; randy.chinn@senate.ca.gov;
rtavares@energy.state.ca.us
Cc: J.P.Shotwell@sce.com; Anthony.Archer@sce.com
Subject: A.00-11-038, SCE's Amended Rate Stabilization Plan Application

Attached is Southern California Edison Company's (U 338-E) Amended Rate
Stabilization Plan Application in the above-referenced proceeding, along
with a revised Exhibit SCE-1, the Rate Stabilization Plan testimony.  An
electronic copy of revised Exhibit SCE-2, the End of Rate Freeze Tariffs,
is not available and is being served via US mail.  Versions of the amended
application and Exhibit SCE-1 showing revision marks are also available
upon request.

SCE attempted to file this amended application with the Commission today,
but the docket office would not accept it for filing because it was nearly
closing time.  SCE is serving the documents today as provided in the
Certificate of Service and will file it with the Commission when the
Commission's Los Angeles office opens at 8:00 a.m. tomorrow morning.

          (See attached file: Application.PDF)   (See attached file:
Testimony.PDF)

These files are Adobe PDF files, which can be read with the Adobe Acrobat
Reader.  If you do not have the Adobe Acrobat Reader, it can be obtained
from the following website at no charge:
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html#reader.

Sincerely,

Anthony V. Archer
(626) 302-3104


Title: Conference Call with OPEC'S President--Chakib Khelil, Minister of Energy and Mines of Algeria
URL(s):

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2786;

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2787;

***********************************************************************

GLOBAL ENERGY CONFERENCE CALL: THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 10:00am EST

We would like to announce a unique opportunity to participate in a CERA Global
Energy Conference Call with OPEC President Chakib Khelil on OPEC's current oil
market strategy. Mr. Khelil has offered to discuss OPEC's current position with
CERA clients, while major market decisions are being made.

* What is the impact of current OPEC decisions on world oil prices?
* Is OPEC's decision really conditional on non-OPEC participation? What level
of non-OPEC participation is deemed sufficient?
* Market share versus price defense strategy
* Supply and demand assessment for next year
* After September 11, is the 22/28 $ price band still relevant?

FORMAT
Our speakers will address these topics for 30 minutes.

SPEAKERS
* Chakib Khelil, Minister of Energy and Mines of Algeria, President of OPEC
* Daniel Yergin, Chairman, Cambridge Energy Research Associates
* Joseph A. Stanislaw, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cambridge Energy
Research Associates
* Vera de Ladoucette, Director, Middle East Research, Cambridge Energy Research
Associates

TIME
10:00 AM U.S. Eastern Time, Thursday, November 15, 2001; (4:00 PM Continental
European Time)

ELIGIBILITY
Clients eligible to participate in this conference call are those who subscribe
to CERA Advisory Services.

TO ENROLL
To enroll, please send a fax to Beth Vitiello at +1 617 441 6898, or enroll via
e-mail at bvitiello@cera.com, before 9:00 A.M., Thursday, November 15, 2001.
Please include your name, company, and telephone number with your
correspondence. Enrollment is not mandatory, but assists us in optimizing the
conference experience. If you are unable to pre-register, please follow the
above URL, click through to the Full Report, and follow the directions to
participate on the day of the call.

TO PARTICIPATE
Follow above URL and click through to the Full Report for instructions on how
to participate in the call (audio and Internet information).

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Notification
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Global Energy, Global Oil

***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
CERA's Autumn 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas
are now available at http://www20.cera.com/event
***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Sara -

This looks okay, considering the relative lack of information.

Dale

Lucy Ortiz
07/26/99 03:32 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sample Lumber Swap

Please review the attached sample swap confirmation.
Like I said, Rob Scheuer is trying to create the Lumber Market and would like
to use ISDA documents in the future.
He will be passing this sample swap confirmation out to many potential
customers.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.

Many thanks and kind regards,

Lucy


Attached for your review are clean and blacklined drafts of each of the following:

1.	Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement and Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex - Enron North America Corp. and Catequil Partners, L.P.

2.	Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement and Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex - Enron North America Corp. and Catequil Overseas Partners, Ltd.

We have revised the definition of "Net Asset Value" set forth in Part 5(p)(b) of each agreement and feel this will take care of the issues.

Please provide us with the date of the investment management agreement for each fund.

In addition, please verify that Catequil Associates LLC is the correct party to sign both agreements as general partner of each of the limited partnerships.

Please do not hesitate to contact Frank Sayre (713/345-7894; frank.sayre@enron.com) or me with any questions or comments.  We look forward to hearing your comments.


Hi Everyone,

This Wednesday, November 1, Dean Tyson will be hosting the second Dean's
Dinner during the 7:30 - 8:15 break.  There's room for 15 people, and it's
a great opportunity to talk with Deans Tyson and Shogan on an informal basis.

Please let me know via e-mail if you're interested in joining us!
First-come, first-served.

Cheers,

Diane


From the phone call, there was some trouble opening the attachment.


All,

The below Analyst & Associate recruiting dates require ENA participation at Manager level at above.   In order to resource each of your departments it is important to have ENA's involvement and participation in the interviews and debrief sessions on Fantastic Friday and Super Saturday events.     These de-brief sessions will allow you the opportunity to select candidates you wish to join your groups.  The target  is to assign potential candidates to business units and departments from the outset.

As ENA has the highest percentage of A&A rotating in its business unit, the participation of ENA at interview should reflect this.     Therefore, please encourage your direct reports and managers to participate in the below events in order to secure candidates for your business area.

Associate Recruiting:		Saturday November 3						Total - 70 Candidates for Interview
Analyst Recruiting:		Friday, November 16						Total - 70 Candidates for Interivew
Associate Recruiting:		Saturday, December 1						Total - 70 Candidates for Interview

The above spreadsheet represents ENA's particpation today which I believe highlights the need for much additional support in these efforts.

Please confirm by return participation of your respective groups.

Regards,

Karen Buckley
HR - ENA


This has been changed to CAISO energy - thanks for catching that.

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/17/2001 02:47 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #499147

No, this is not deja vu.  I am now ready to confirm this deal, however, it
has the wrong energy type.  Can you change this and let me know.

Thanks!


Tracy just told me this counterparty (PPL Montana) is still pending credit.
Mike Swerzbin said he would prefer to wait this out, because he stands to
make money on the deal. So in the meantime, I've been told by credit that we
can't enter the deal in the system and calc it. I'm not sure how this works
in your case with the Prebon check-out, but basically it's a pending credit
deal that will potentially show up in our system once EPMI and PPL Montana
reach an agreement. Does that help? Let me know.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 11:22 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

Hi Kate, what's the status of this deal?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/12/2001 10:57 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

this deal is contingent on credit - he'll let me know later today whether or
not it's a good trade.

thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 09:00 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

sorry Friday, 3/9

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/12/2001 10:52 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

what was the trade date on this?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 08:58 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing deal?

Prebon sent over a confirm for a deal where:
Enron (Mike Swerzbin) buys from PPL Montana Cal'04-Cal'06 25 mw of Mid-C at
$45.00 off-peak hours.

They did not tell me about this deal during checkout.  Can you please check
with Mike.

Thanks!!


I'll read it then call you.


I received the binder.  Thank you.   Mark


Mark Haedicke is on the left, Mark Frevert (Chairman of the wholesale markets
subsidiaries) on the right.

Yours truly, et al


Another Utility Bailout Should Leave Us Cold
George Miller
Sunday, December 31, 2000
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/12/31/E
D134916.DTL
OUR CURRENT energy problems are urgent and serious. But before the governor
and the Public Utilities Commission cut yet another deal costing consumers
billions of dollars, perhaps they should pause to ask the public what kind of
system it wants and what it will end up with after investing billions more.
Failure of energy deregulation could speed real deregulation that might
benefit consumers with real capacity and real competition. But this will not
happen if the focus is only on California utilities and their shareholders.
The original deregulation deal was designed, as I see it, to keep competition
out of California -- and to maximize the rates consumers would pay for every
bad past business decision by PG&E and other California utilities.
Similarly, current bailout discussions are about forcing California
ratepayers to pay for the failed deregulation plan designed by the utilities
themselves. Once again, the companies seek to maximize profits and socialize
the losses.
Following on the heels of California's deregulation, the state's utilities
came to the congressional delegation and urged us to protect the plan from
federal deregulation efforts. They argued that the deal they cut was good for
all parties. Their executives repeated time and again that they might benefit
from the plan's cap on consumer prices -- and that there was a risk to them
if wholesale prices were to go up.
This, they told us, is the marketplace. They were willing to absorb the risk.
This was the brave new world of free markets.
But markets are never free. From the beginning, this deregulation plan was
designed to buy the California utilities time and advantage. Initially,
consumers saw lower rates, but not as low as real competition might have
provided when compared to the heavily sheltered market of the past five
years. Now, because this rigged marketplace has failed, the utilities want
again to put their hands into the ratepayers' pockets.
At first, PG&E and Southern California Edison asked the Public Utilities
Commission to have California consumers pay the entire cost of deregulation's
risks. Their idea did not pass the smell or the laugh test.
Now the utilities look for a way to repackage their old proposal, including a
substantial rate increase. The rationale is that the utilities may collapse
financially. This threat is supposed to inspire Gov. Gray Davis and the PUC
to quickly put the ratepayer on the hook for the utilities' failures.
During the past year, dozens of utilities have merged all across America.
PG&E, for example, may not be worth much to its shareholders, but like AT&T,
it may be worth something to its competitors. This is the genius of the
American marketplace.
PG&E shareholders bought the stock, assuming the risk. Why should the
ratepayers be asked to insulate them from that risk? During this past year,
tens of billions of dollars of market capitalization were lost by various
Silicon Valley high-tech firms. Their shareholders do not get the benefit of
going to the PUC and getting a taxpayer bailout.
The ratepayer has already paid for this energy under a contract that
utilities struck with the people of the state of California. Any additional
payment by the ratepayer is a financial bailout. Any prudent investor would
ask what the return will be before handing over billions of dollars. The
ratepayer deserves an answer, as well as some equity or other consideration.
George Miller is a Democratic congressman from Martinez.


thanks for the tip
PL


Professor Ueng:
Hope all is going well and you have either finished or are almost finished
your Phd.  I was wondering if I could be able to find out my grade for the
Financial Mgmt. class (MBA-5318 A) I took with you this summer.  Is there a
website we can go to or something?  Thanks!
Ben Rogers


Attached is the final list for name changes and mergers for August 2000.

The name change overlays were done on the dates indicated.

The ERMS short names will be changed TOMORROW, August 23, in the afternoon.
If there are any objections please contact me or Bill Hare at  X3-9249.

Record inactivations will be done on the afternoon of Sept, 1.

Please call Cheryl for questions or comments X3-3103


Just wanted to let you know that the fed cut ? point to bring the fed funds rate to 2%

Stephen M. Benotti
Financial Consultant
Emery Financial Group
713-853-2388 (Direct)
866-753-9556
713-853-2366 (Fax)
sbenott@firstunion1.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT on
04/05/2001 03:58 PM ---------------------------

"Jeff Fleming" <jfleming@rice.edu> on 04/05/2001 03:24:25 PM
Please respond to <jfleming@rice.edu>
To: <Pinnamaneni.Krishnarao@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: hi!

One other person that I forgot to mention -- Praveen Kumar.  I don't know
exactly what he does, mostly theory stuff I guess.  Any way, he is also
really good and highly respected in the profession; probably ranks right up
there with (but second to) Bong-Soo.

Jeff

Jeff Fleming
Associate Professor
Jones Graduate School of Management -- MS 531
Rice University
6100 Main Street
Houston, TX 77005

713/348-4677 (voice)
713/348-5251 (fax)
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jfleming


More broadly speaking, we need to insure that the assignment of capacity
leaves the pipeline no recourse back to Enron for everything outside of the
contract year.  If this is not the case, we should revisit the credit
reserve.   If this is the case then we need to rebook the transactions to
reflect this.

Bill

From:  Russell Diamond
     09/25/2000 01:50 PM

To: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald
Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: JM - Trailblazer

To All:

After speaking to Bill, we are giving approval to this second transaction
between JM Huber and ENA with the condition that the assignment of transport
capacity is taken on by JM for BOTH transactions as previously discussed, and
I initial this contract which clearly states this assignment of capacity.  It
was our assumption, in Credit, that this initial transaction with JM was to
include the assignment of capacity, which lead to a re-evaluation of the
credit reserve.  It is imperative now, that once the contract and
transactions are executed, they be re-confirmed in TAGG to more accurately
reflect the exposure of JM

Russell


We have received several inquiries on the email link embedded in the
communication distributed on December 27, 2000 by Steve Kean and Cindy Olson
in reference to the PRC process.  If you have experienced problems when
clicking on this link, copy and paste the link into an email message.  We
apologize for any convenience this may have caused.  Please contact your
local IT Help desk, should you continue to have problems.
The email address to submit your ideas and suggestions is perfmgmt@enron.com


Stan,

Here's the latest message points from EEI regarding retail standards.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Brown/HOU/EES on 07/19/2000 09:59 AM
---------------------------

"Michael McGrath" <MMcGrath@eei.org> on 07/19/2000 08:28:52 AM
To: <Burrell.G.Kilmer@bge.com>, <geoffrey.green@cmpco.com>,
<JTG@dps.state.ny.us>, "Alice Travis" <ATravis@eei.org>, "Charles Foster"
<CFoster@eei.org>, "Elizabeth Stipnieks" <EStipnieks@eei.org>, "William
Mayer" <WMayer@eei.org>, <jbrown1@enron.com>, <nhetrick@enron.com>,
<Cacquard@erols.com>, <Rbrown@exeloncorp.com>, <jbladen@newenergy.com>,
<refuller@nyseg.com>, <jcunningham@paea.org>, <bbradley@peco-energy.com>,
<bdcrowe@peco-energy.com>, <jmminneman@pplweb.com>,
<craig.glazer@puc.state.oh.us>, <cherie-broadrick@reliantenergy.com>,
<keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com>, <deichenlaub@scc.state.va.us>,
<ccraven1@txu.com>, <sharon.b.grove@ucm.com>, <kathy.smith@us.abb.com>
cc:
Subject: Future of Retail UBP

Attached are talking points expressing my view of where we've been and where
we are going.

Comments appreciated!

We will doscuss next steps in the Advisory Cmte conference call tomorrow.

Thanks
  -Mike

 - UBP.advcmte.talkingpoints.doc


FYI.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:32 PM
To: 'Josh Bortman'
Subject: RE: Bidding

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Bortman [mailto:bortman@haas.berkeley.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:30 PM
To: sidbury@haas.berkeley.edu; jestings@haas.berkeley.edu;
huey@haas.berkeley.ed; llevine@haas.berkeley.edu;
kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu; balwani@haas.berkeley.edu;
andychen@haas.berkeley.edu; graca@haas.berkeley.edu;
jagannat@haas.berkeley.edu; guinney@haas.berkeley.edu;
sklarin@haas.berkeley.edu; keffer@haas.berkeley.edu;
lysaght@haas.berkeley.edu; vavrek@haas.berkeley.edu;
clee@haas.berkeley.edu; fiske@haas.berkeley.edu; pine@haas.berkeley.edu;
debruyn@haas.berkeley.edu; scharf@haas.berkeley.edu;
cjenkins@haas.berkeley.edu; kerudi@haas.berkeley.edu;
tamborni@haas.berkeley.edu; blanchar@haas.berkeley.edu;
wadhwa@haas.berkeley.edu; jhowe@haas.berkeley.edu;
azhao@haas.berkeley.edu; asbo@haas.berkeley.edu;
magner@haas.berkeley.edu; keshav@haas.berkeley.edu;
shrivast@haas.berkeley.edu; viswanat@haas.berkeley.edu;
hari@haas.berkeley.edu; vbansal@haas.berkeley.edu;
mendelso@haas.berkeley.edu; hornbeck@haas.berkeley.edu;
dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu; langridg@haas.berkeley.edu
Cc: tj@haas.berkeley.edu
Subject: Bidding

This is a reminder to all 3rd year students that you should be bidding for
classes today. The first round of bidding ends tomorrow Thursday, November
8, at 12 noon. If you have any questions please give us a call at 510-642-1406

Good Luck

Josh Bortman
EWMBA Program


Jeff,

 I need to see the site plan for Burnet.  Remember I must get written
approval from Brenda Key Stone before I can sell this property and she has
concerns about the way the property will be subdivided.    I would also like
to review the closing statements as soon as possible.

Phillip


Why is the fact that I'm moving down there making you you lean towards
staying up here?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 12:09 PM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE: FW: What's up?

I don't know for sure if I am.  I am just in the "seriously thinking about
it" stages.  However the fact that you are moving down there is definetly
making me lean toward staying up here.  Tell your mom if you move and I
stay she can adopt me.


- 101_126PIP_Language.zip


The report named: Power West Price Peak <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=30&report_name=Power+West+Price+Peak&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/18/2001>, published as of 10/18/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


www.energysource.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Michael E
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 8:13 AM
To:	Woods, Trevor
Subject:	Nox Model

Trevor,

Raj ran a lot of senstivity analysis.  I will run the current model with our best assumptions again.  So it will be ready in 30 minutes.

O:\Liquids\Liquids\Coal\Emissions\mike t\Current NOx\NOX Final Model

Michael Taylor
Coal and Emissions Trading
Enron Global Markets
(713) 853-1885


please print out this e-mail w/ the attachment and file
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
04:36 PM ---------------------------

Frank Lobdell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/23/2000 05:36 PM
To: Richard B Sanders@ECT, Twanda Sweet@ECT
cc: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ann
Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: NSM Expenses

Attached is further detail of the first file sent in the message below.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Frank (ext. 6-7831)
---------------------- Forwarded by Frank Lobdell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/23/2000 05:27 PM ---------------------------

Frank Lobdell
02/16/2000 11:11 AM
To: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: NSM Expenses

Chris,

The attached schedule details the $1.3 million of costs incurred on the NSM
Power Plant Project.  Note that until December 1999 these costs were deferred
costs on our balance sheet.  In December, however, we wrote these costs off.

Thanks,
Frank

Christopher B Hunt
02/16/2000 06:37 AM
To: Frank  Lobdell
cc:

Subject: NSM Expenses

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

Frank -

Would it be possible to get a printout of all the expenses incurred on the
NSM Power Plant AFE?  An itemized list and total would be perfect if that is
possible.  I need the list because ECT is being sued over their involvement
and one allegation would be helped if we can prove that we were very
committed to making the project work (e.g., through spending a lot of time
and money on the power plant).

I'll need this by Tuesday afternoon if possible to give to the ECT
attorneys.  Sending it by e-mail would be best so I can add a note and
forward it on.

Thanks,

Chris


When: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: Lynn's Office

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


OK- Thank you for the info.  We will advise on bunkering in conjunction with
the decision on whether or not to heel out.
Dan Masters

"LNG/C Hoegh Galleon - Master" <master.amar@hoegh.no> on 03/19/2001 02:34:09
PM
To: "Dan Masters, Enron Houston" <Dan.Masters@enron.com>
cc: "Tony Galt, Enron Houston" <Tony.Galt@enron.com>, "Jim Fernie, Enron
Houston" <Jim.Fernie@enron.com>, "Paul.Y'Barbo, Enron Houston"
<Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com>, "Wayne Perry, Enron Houston"
<Wayne.Perry@enron.com>, "Leif Hoegh & Co. ASA - Nord, Roald" <rln@hoegh.no>
Subject: LNG/C"HOEGH GALLEON"   - Bunkering

Dear Dan.

Due to the time schedule and uncertainty regarding the eta Fujairah,
we desided to not nominating bunkers for topping up this time.
The vessel's rob on arrival Qalhat will be abt F.O. 3800mt and G.O.
155 mt.

Best regards

Capt Kjell Kvammen  LNG/C "HOEGH GALLEON"

Brgds Oe. Hansen
Master

E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no. 330853910
Fax   : Inmarsat fax no. 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.430853910 (24hrs.watch)


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 09:14
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           10/10/2000 09:13 AM

To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, al.larsen@enron.com
cc:

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2

I believe this to be the latest draft of the PSCO change order.
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 09:11
AM ---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/05/2000 05:36 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris.booth@enron.com
cc:

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2

Kay, Ben & Chris:

Attached is the latest draft of Change Order #2 for your review & input:

Kathy


fyi...

-----Original Message-----
From: navigator@nisource.com [mailto:navigator@nisource.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:04 AM
To: navigator@nisource.com
Subject: LINE SM-123

                      COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 18, 2001

Notice ID: 3193
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

NOTE:  The following is being provided by Columbia as notice to all of its
shippers of potential outages or reductions in available capacity in the
identified portions of the system due to construction activities, routine
maintenance, modifications, tests or repairs undertaken to protect the
integrity and performance capability of its storage and transmission
facilities.  The information provided below is subject to change for numerous
reasons, including but not limited to, third-party controlled events and
decisions, weather, work schedules, equipment availability, force majeure
events, etc.  Thus, while Columbia is willing to provide this notice and update
it periodically as necessary, Columbia is unable to represent and warrant that
the specific activities will occur, or that they will occur on or near the
specified dates.

SUBJECT:   LINE SM-123

Columbia anticipates that between October 25th and October 27th, Line SM-123
will be taken out of service due to long-wall mining activity.  Columbia
estimates the line to be out of service for twenty-one (21) days.  The start
date and duration of the outage is contingent upon the actual timing and
progress of the long-wall mining activity.  Given the level of firm commitments
in this area, Columbia believes that there will be no available capacity for
interruptible transportation.

The following receipt points will be affected:

   Equitable Gas:    Beaver Creek      (H1)
                     Hi Hat            (F3)

   CNR Pipeline:     Boldman           (CNR02)
                     Conoway           (CNR03)
                     Johns Creek       (CNR08)
                     Canada            (CNR09)
                     Canada            (CNR10)
                     Stafford          (CNR11)
                     Thacker/Majestic  (CNR12)
                     Briar Mtn.        (CNR13)
                     Huff Creek        (CNR14)

   Conoco:           Grant             (P1)

The same is true with respect to any Appalachian production flowing directly
into Columbia's Line KA between Columbia's Boldman Compressor Station and
Columbia's Huff Creek Compressor Station as well as production flowing into
Columbia's Lines SM-116, KA-15, PM-3 and PM-17.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact your Customer Services Team.


Dear All:
Sheila and I spent a weekend on the Frio River in August last summer and
really enjoyed it. The place we stayed was run down. We have upgraded this
year. The place we have chosen has 100 plus acres and four new and neat
cabins. 140 a night for three night minumum. we have rented one of the four
cabins for the weekend August 8 (thursday) to 11 (sunday). The other 3
cabins are available.

Go check out their web site at www.friobluffcabins.com

Anyone interested? Might be alot of fun if we booked up the place to cool
off in August.
FYI lots of fun tubing and shooting whitewings with your finger gun while
anticipating opening dove season around the corner.

e.

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com