I am still lacking waiver transaction dues from the  following teams:

Aryan Brother - $16
Beer Gut - $12 ($4 for  Replacements)
CYSWC - $8
Dallas Demon Horde - $12
High Shrivel Factor - $38
South Park - $4
Water Boys - $16

Send checks to:

Kevin Crawford
9826 Chiselhurst Dr.
Houston, Tx 77065

The winner of the FFL bowl this year goes to the  Kurt Warner led Team T-Bone.  They defeated their rival, the Blue Star  Boys, in an all southern shootout (although only one team appeared to be  shooting).  Thanks to everyone and I hope to see everyone back next  year!!

Here is the final official payout schedule for  2001:

FFL Bowl Winner     $950 + waivers
FFL Bowl Loser            $400
Division Champion   $425 (2)
Wild  Card           $225  (2)
Points Champion     $400
Weekly Point  High   $100

Later,

Kevin


I would like to see you get on the Denver 1/2 day schedule.  Any 12 hours you choose from 6:00 A. M. to 8:00 P.M.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fuller, Dave
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:45 AM
To:	Presas, Jessica; Tycholiz, Barry
Cc:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	RE: Work Hours

I plan to continue my normal schedule of working 6am to 4pm which coincides with noramal Houston hours, covers spot gas trading, covers spot power trading and overlaps with most of my customers hours in the west.  When necessary I will come in early or stay late.  Please let me know if there are any issues there.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presas, Jessica
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:31 AM
To:	Bronstein, Mara; Felling, Amy; Fuller, Dave; Harrison, Tyrell; Lucci, Paul T.; Miller, Stephanie; Polsky, Phil; Staab, Theresa; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Whitt, Mark
Cc:	DuBose, Heidi
Subject:	FW: Work Hours

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Presas, Jessica
Subject:	FW: Work Hours

Please circulate to west gas Orig group.

Thanks. BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 6:46 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Gay, Randall L.; Heu, Mog; Holst, Keith; Huang, Jason; Kuykendall, Tori; Lenhart, Matthew; Lisk, Daniel; Reitmeyer, Jay; Sanchez, Monique; Scott, Susan M.; Smith, Matt; South, Steven P.; Sullivan, Patti; Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry; Wolfe, Jason
Subject:	Work Hours

Dear West,

We talked briefly on Monday about our commitment to a full work day at Enron.  If you are in the office, then please be prepared to contribute to the group for a full day.  Our schedule now calls for critical communication in the afternoons.  We need to know that each employee will be here every day to create the consistency needed to outperform the rest of the market.

We want to remain as flexible as possible with all traders when it comes to an emergency, but remember that you have a commitment to Enron to contribute a full work day.

Please organize your vacation on the west desk calendar with Ina and coordinate any early afternoon departures with Ina and myself.  Also, prepare to have your markets covered when you leave the office early.

Sincerely,

Mike


Dear Students,

The library will close at 5pm on Wednesday, November 21 (the day before
Thanksgiving) and will be closed through Thanskgiving, Thursday, November
22. Will re-open from 1-5pm on Friday, November 23 and resume regular
weekend and other hours thereafter.

Though you will be in classes on Wednesday, you will find that most of Haas
and the UCB campus are in "out for holidays" mode. I will not be here on
Wednesday since the library will be closed in the evening. Send weekend
questions NOW if you want a response from me before next Monday.

Give yourselves a nice holiday and I look forward to seeing your refreshed
faces when you return.

Monica Singh


20% is absolute low on surge margin for this unit.   IF IT GOES BELOW 20% RAISE THE SUCTION SET POINT!!!   The unit will lock into minimum RPM when surge margin hits 15% and will not unlock until surge margin gets above 20%.   Recommended to change set point in 10#  increments when lowering set point so surge margin can be better monitored.   Alarm limits have changed.

                                                                                LO - 25

                                                                                LO LO - 20

                                                                                Thanks
                                                                                Bart


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 08:40 AM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	08/22/2000 05:53 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/22/00

The EOL approvals for 08/22/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


Matt has a win and Harry a loss.  They tied but the win goes to the one with
the most reserve points.

Bryan Hull
09/26/2000 10:36 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dallas

I'm in.  Nice comeback by The Fat Bastards last night!!  Harry said that he
and Matt had tied, and now they both have a loss. How come they have a loss
instead of a tie?
B

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           09/26/2000 10:19 AM

To: Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dallas

Plove is going to go to Dallas.  We are going to leave next Friday when he
gets done (7ish) and go up for the game.  The game is at 11 in the morning,
so we will come home directly after it.  Plove says he has a friend who has a
place in Dallas that we can crash at if we don't want to pay for a hotel.

Do you want to go?

-Eric


Here you go!

Robin


FYI. Thank you for your assistance.  Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rogers, Rex
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:22 PM
To:	Cole, Kate; Callahan, Teresa; Pardue, Larry; Pinder, Lori
Cc:	Davis, Hardie; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Requests for Jim Derrick's signature on financial documents

Kate:  Your memo is timely (and appreciated!).  Jim and I and the other general counsels discussed this topic this morning at Jim's weekly general counsels meeting (Jim and I are receiving a ton of these type of documents).  With respect to subsidiary financial statements requiring Jim Derrick's sign-off, the internal accounting officer and the internal lawyer representing the subsidiary company must initial the documents Jim is being asked to sign;  they are then sent to me (I also initial anything that Jim signs that relates to Arthur Andersen, per Jim's request).  Jim and I are not CPAs and we have little to do with the day-to-day operations of most of these companies, so that is the reason for all the diligence.  It is the responsibility of the general counsel of the subsidiary operation whose financial statements are being audited by AA to ensure that the proper review and initials are on these documents before they come to your group or mine----if not, we send the documents back to them to get the necessary initials.  If you have any problems with anyone who delivers these documents to you, let me know and I will be happy to educate them about this policy.  Bottom line for Jim and me:  We have little knowledge or expertise when it comes to the preparation of the financial statements of these companies, and we are relying on the expertise of our internal accountants who are involved in such preparation----they need to take "ownership" by initialing the documents.   Thanks for your help?.I hope these procedures don't make your job any harder than it already is!.   Regards, Rex.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cole, Kate
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Callahan, Teresa; Pardue, Larry; Pinder, Lori
Cc:	Rogers, Rex; Davis, Hardie; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Requests for Jim Derrick's signature on financial documents

Please note that, henceforth, all financial statements, balance sheets, Arthur Anderson rep. letters, or the like, should be sent to Rex Rogers for review and attorney initials before they are sent to Jim Derrick for signature.  KC

Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
Fax: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Iona Maclean/LON/ECT on 22/09/2000 12:24
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Simon Turner <sturner@IIRLTD.CO.UK>
22/09/2000 11:29

To: Keiron.Ferguson@accessenergy.nl, mcrosno@altra.com, ed@apx.com,
alaw@avistaenergy.com, markw@citizenspower.com,
chris_strickland@compuserve.com, hbrett@cyberbuilding.com, geman@dauphine.fr,
charles.heard@dc.com, chris.miller@dc.com, gilbert.toppin@dc.com,
pat.breen@dc.com, stuart.beeston@dc.com, klaus.petzel@dowjones.com,
sama@dynegy.com, jdaly@enermetrix.com, Iona.Maclean@enron.com,
vkaminski@enron.com, mwalsh@envifi.com, mark@fea.com,
bachar.samawi@gen.pge.com, garman@haas.berkeley.edu,
fgetman@houstonstreet.com, dave.gardner@innogy.com, StephenG@ipe.uk.com,
Lecoq_Sophie@jpmorgan.com, ruckt@kochind.com, les@lacima.co.uk,
simon@localbloke.freeserve.co.uk, carlhans.uhle@lpx.de, e.westre@mvv.de,
pwold@natsourcetulletteurope.com, david.whitley@nordpool.com,
lburke@nymex.com, xavier.bruckert@omgroup.com,
Aram.Sogomonian@pacificorp.com, Peter.Haigh@pgen.com,
Sven.Otten@PreussenElektra.de, detlef_r_hallermann@reliantenergy.com,
phil.saunders@southernenergy-europe.nl,
alexander.eydeland@southernenergy.com, Juerg_Trueb@swissre.com,
alang@tfs-ln.co.uk, annunziata@tradecapture.com,
martin.stanley@txu-europe.com, simon.harrington@txu-europe.com,
rob@weatherderivs.com
cc:

Subject: PoweRisk 2000 - Important Invitation

** High Priority **

Dear Colleague

Please find attached two invitations to Cocktail Parties to be held at
PoweRisk 2000.

You will receive a formal invitation by post.  However, just in case this
does not reach you by any chance, please print off the attached copies and
bring these with you.

The Cocktails will provide the opportunity to meet all other speakers and
delegates.

We look forward to seeing you next week.

Regards

Rosemary Fitzgerald
PoweRisk 2000

 - cocktail-invite.doc


Mr. Lay will not be available to meet with Mr. Thompson.

Rosalee

"Sheila Whitman" <sheila@ctaonline.com> on 04/18/2001 04:13:08 PM
To: <klay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Meeting with Carl Thomspson 4/23

?

[IMAGE]

Mr. Lay:

Our CEO, Carl Thompson, will be available to meet with you while he is  in
Houston next Monday, April 23. The purpose of his visit is to meet with  CEOs
like yourself to discuss how Carl Thompson Associates (www.ctaonline.com) can
assist you in  bringing additional retail interest into your stock. Our
brochure is  attached for your information.

If this has any interest, please call Carl Thompson at (303) 665-4200  or
email carl@ctaonline.com.

 - logo.gif
 - Hire the IR Experts.doc
 - CTABROCHURE.pdf


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY PM EDITION
is now available at http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

AFTERNOON HIGHLIGHTS:

TELECOM: Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., decried the FCC's "fairly ancient"
equipment but praised the agency's staff for doing good work anyway.

BUSINESS: Development experts shared their insights on how to lure tech
firms to states and localities.

E-COMMERCE: Ernest (Fritz) Hollings' elevation to the chairmanship of a key
Senate panel could impact the fate of anti-spam legislation.

LOBBYING: The U.S. Telecom Association is poised to tap American Trucking
Associations chief Walter McCormick to head its Washington office.

TECH DAILY AFTERNOON FEATURE:
State Roundup: Staff Writer Liza Porteus looks at how some governors favor
a vote on e-commerce taxation.
Click here to go directly to the feature -
http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/features/states/stat010531.htm

ALSO ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- Poll Track Extra: How Party Plays Out On The Issues
http://nationaljournal.com/members/news/2001/05/0531ptextra.htm

-- Capitol Corridors: Getting The True Sense Of The Senate
http://nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/capitolcorridors.htm

******************************************************
CAPITAL CAREER SOURCE TOP JOBS -- week of 5/28/01
Jeffords switches parties -- Is it time to switch jobs?

1. Cmte for Economic Devt - Pub Affairs Manager
http://4.36.215.157/cgi-bin/wc.dll?ViewPosting~_0E70TKRPV
2. Natl Senior Citizens Law Center - Executive Director
http://4.36.215.157/cgi-bin/wc.dll?ViewPosting~_0E70YLGZ4
3. NFIB - Asst Dir of Media Communication
http://4.36.215.157/cgi-bin/wc.dll?ViewPosting~_0E80KXY4S

For more jobs, go to http://www.capitalcareersource.com
******************************************************

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------

National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


Please follow up directly with the referenced developers...........
---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas M Suffield/Corp/Enron on
02/23/2000 08:58 AM ---------------------------

Richard Park@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/22/2000 06:48 PM
To: Thomas M Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Summary of meeting w/ Don Miller

Subject: Progress on projects

Attendance Don Miller
  Scott Healy (phone)
  Don Black
  Tom Swank
  Mike Miller/Ben Jacoby (left in middle)

TECO (Don) Revenue potential in $18-20 MM with cost at $16-20 MM
  Model/Algorithm in place with sensitivities next week
  Need data point for credit analysis
  ABM AMRO ?? financial advisor
  Insurance Angle ??
  Need support from CTG for modeling and contract negotiations:  Ben R.and
Jinsung

UAE (Tom) $120 MM for 5 turbines
  Enron price: 13.5 base; 13.95 w/ Sprint enhancement
  S&S (market): 14.1; 14.6
  Straight turbine sell-down but contrary to Enron strategy
  Issues between: Drywell/ DLE/water injection

  UAE will go forward w/ or w/o Enron-Ben Rogers

Scott:  Need bid number from desk for PJM
  Restructuring effort (TBG) John House and Chad L.

Don:  Finding strategic partner for IPO spin-off of generation assets
  Candidates: Orion, NRG, Mission, Sithe, Cogentrix, Panda, and other smaller
players
  50,000-foot level discussion-Ben T, Clement Lau

Some of the part was too mundane to be captured as discussion points!  Please
forward to the right people.

Regards,
Rich


Here is my first cut at an Issues List for Wednesday.  Let me know what you
think.

My meeting with Mark H. has been moved up to 1:00.  He may want to get you on
the phone then but I don't really know.


Can you check and make sure this is the correct counterparty on this deal?
We did a deal in February (#533916) with a little different name.  Also we
will need a counterparty contact.

Thanks!


Here is a copy of the economists letter the Independent Institute released on
health care.  It is about 330 words long.

http://independent.org/tii/news/OpenLetterHealthCare0002.html

Here is my first draft of a letter to economists for power price caps.  It is
275 words long, so we have some room.

The tricky thing here is the interplay between retail and wholesale price
regulation that is not present in other price control situations.  In other
words, the public utility nature of retail prices complicates things a bit,
so our letter will have to be careful about not losing support from
economists who wonder if this is really about a natural monopoly
situation--at retail at least.

Maybe instead of price decontrol at retail we can just call for a move toward
real-time pricing.

Comments appreciated.

- Rob

Thank you for your assistance.

Best regards,

David

>Let's just continue to use the $30k.
>
>Can you e:mail me the letter on health care so I can play off it a bit with
>my draft on energy price controls?
>
>- Rob
>
>Robert L. Bradley Jr.
>Director, Public Policy Analysis
>Enron Corp.
>P.O Box 1188, Room 4736D
>[1400 Smith Street 77002]
>Houston, Texas 77251-1188
>
>(P) 713-853-3062
>(F) 713-646-4702
>
>Assistant: Joan Stransky 713-853-7431
>jstrans@enron.com
>
>
>
>                     David Theroux
>                     <DTheroux@indepe        To:     Rob.Bradley@enron.com
>                     ndent.org>              cc:
>                                             Subject:     Re: Economist
Letter
>                     06/29/2001 07:19
>                     PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Dear Rob,
>
>Thanks for your note.
>
>At 5 cents per page, we would start out by using 60,000 pages for the
>mailing to economists (3 sheets per addressee).  When you add the
>copying of responses, re-mailing, email photocopies copies, and much
>more, it adds up pretty fast.
>
>However, if you wish, we could allocate the funding in other ways,
>such as for the costs of personalized word-processed letters to the
>economists on our in-house and rented lists.
>
>I look forward to speaking with you and your colleagues on Monday.
>
>Thanks again.
>
>Best regards,
>
>David
>
>>At 5 cents per page this would be 120,000 pages.  We have $15,000 for
>labor
>>help on this so I assume this is only machine cost.  When we talk about
>>budget on Monday we can discuss this.
>>
>>- Rob
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                      David Theroux
>>                      <DTheroux@indepe        To:     Rob.Bradley@enron.com
>>                      ndent.org>              cc:
>>                                              Subject:     Re: Economist
>Letter
>>                      06/27/2001 11:26
>>                      AM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Dear Rob,
>>
>>The photocopying figure is for the thousands of letters and forms to
>>be copied for the mailing as well as the records of those who agree
>>as signatories.  It is important that we keep an accurate record of
>>each and every piece of communications, especially for the
>>signatories.  In many cases, we have found that we will have resend
>>the letters because of bad addresses and from requests of other
>>economists who hear about the Open Letter.
>>
>>Hence, the photocopying figure is a mixture which will continue
>>throughout the project.
>>
>>As for the sponsorship, my suggestion is really two-fold:
>>1.  The funding come from a non-industry entity not identifiable with
>>Enron so that the project not even have the suggestion of
>>impropriety.  As with all of our supporters, we would also not
>>identify the funder with the project, but if asked, we could state
>>that no industry support was involved.
>>2.  The Open Letter have listed as co-sponsors various non-energy
>>industry related groups, including possible consumer, labor,
>>academic, environmental, health, business and other groups.  The goal
>>here is to reinforce the fact that the case against price controls is
>>one that is supported by a wide range of people who indeed would
>>suffer enormously from such harmful policies.
>>
>>I would be delighted to discuss these and other matters in a
>>conference call on Friday morning or Monday afternoon.  Please just
>>let me know what might work for you.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>David
>>
>>>David:
>>>
>>>I want to make sure I can defend the budget and had a question.  The
>>>photocopying expense really jumps out.  What does this entail, and could
>>we
>>>reduce it by using the equipment at our SF office.  How many pages are
>>>involved in the $6,000 figure?
>>>
>>>You make a good point on making the sponsorship as broad as possible,
>>which
>>>would also help us attract money for the media part (which I thought was
>>>part of the $30,000).  We should try to get up a conference call with
>some
>>>of us from here and you to discuss this further.  Are you free early
>>Friday
>>>afternoon or Monday?
>>>
>>>
>>>- Rob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                       David Theroux
>>>                       <DTheroux@indepe        To:
>Rob.Bradley@enron.com
>>>                       ndent.org>              cc:
>>>                                               Subject:     Re: Economist
>>Letter
>>>                       06/27/2001 12:30
>>>                       AM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Dear Rob,
>>>
>>>As promised, here is the breakdown of the budget to assemble the Open
>>>Letter with signatories:
>>>
>>>BUDGET:
>>>Assembling snail mail lists of economists          3,000
>>>Assembling email list of economists           2,000
>>>Materials                     500
>>>Photocopying                  6,000
>>>Postage                       7,000
>>>Mailing costs                 600
>>>Telephone                     400
>>>Secretarial                   4,000
>>>Administrative                6,000
>>>Misc.                         500
>>>TOTAL                         30,000
>>>
>>>Media promotional and advertising costs would be additional depending
>>>upon what media were selected for targeting.  In the past, we have
>>>released the resulting Open Letter through a major media
>>>release/blitz. A press conference could be used in doing so, with ads
>>>to follow where considered appropriate. Advertising for past Open
>>>Letters has ranged from major newspapers to more targeted political
>>>and opinion publications.
>>>
>>>Also, with our most recent Open Letter on health-care price controls,
>>>we assembled a group of ten other organizations as co-sponsors to
>>>broaden the credibility and impact of the Open Letter, and to engage
>>>the support of the leadership and membership of such groups.  As a
>>>result, thought should be made as to what diverse groups might be
>>>sympathetic.  In addition, the possibility of enlisting the
>>>assistance of various industry groups (energy, etc.) who, although
>>>not necessarily listed as co-sponsors, would enable the Open Letter
>>>to reach a significant number of people through their own internal
>>>communications systems in order to bolster public support for the
>>>Letter.
>>>
>>>We also suggest that the source of the funding be one not
>>>identifiable with Enron.
>>>
>>>Please advise me with any questions.
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>>
>>>David
>>>
>>>David J. Theroux
>>>Founder and President
>>>The Independent Institute
>>>100 Swan Way
>>>Oakland, CA 94621-1428
>>>510-632-1366 Phone
>>>510-568-6040 Fax
>>>DTheroux@independent.org
>>>http://www.independent.org
>>>
>>>>Dear David:
>>>>
>>>>We are interested in proceeding with the open letter project but first
>>>need
>>>>to get in writing the parameters of the project and cost estimates for
>>the
>>>>administrative part of the project and the publicity buy.  The latter
>>part
>>>>would seem to be more of a discretionary cost.
>>>>
>>>>The two folks that will be working on this from our side are myself and
>>>>Jeff Dasovich (415-782-7822).
>>>>
>>>>Look forward to hearing from someone on your staff.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>- Rob
>>>>
>>>>Robert L. Bradley Jr.
>>>>Director, Public Policy Analysis
>>>>Enron Corp.
>>>>P.O Box 1188, Room 4741c
>>>>[1400 Smith Street 77002]
>>>>Houston, Texas 77251-1188
>>>>
>>>>(P) 713-853-3062
>>>>(F) 713-646-4702
>>>>
>>>>Assistant: Joan Stransky 713-853-7431
>>>>jstrans@enron.com
>>>>----- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 06/11/2001 06:46 PM -----
>>>>
>>>>                        Richard
>>>>                        Shapiro              To:     Rob
>>>Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
>>>>                                             cc:     Jeff
>>>>Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
>>>>                        06/11/2001           Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
>>>>                        05:55 PM             Subject:     Re: Economist
>>>>Letter(Document link:
>>>>                                             Rob Bradley)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Let er rip- we'll pay.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Rob Bradley
>>>>06/11/2001 11:49 AM
>>>>
>>>>To:   Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
>>>>cc:   Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
>>>>
>>>>Subject:  Re: Economist Letter  (Document link: Richard Shapiro)
>>>>
>>>>If this is a go, I would get in touch right now with the Independent
>>>>Institute--they will find David Theroux and get the information you
>need.
>>>>Would Enron pay for all of this, or can we quickly mobilize others to
>>help
>>>>pay for it?
>>>>
>>>>- Rob
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                        Jeff Dasovich
>>>>                        Sent by: Jeff        To:     Richard
>>>>Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
>>>>                        Dasovich             cc:     James D
>>>>Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rob
>>>>                                             Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
>>>>                                             Subject:     Re: Economist
>>>>Letter(Document link:
>>>>                        06/10/2001           Rob Bradley)
>>>>                        11:36 AM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The foundation can do it, but the contact is on vacation (or at least
>out
>>>>of town) for the next week or two.  Idea is to get it done as soon as he
>>>>gets back.  Rob may have more info.
>>>>
>>>>I've also contacted Teece at LECG/UC Berkeley and am going to follow up
>>>>with him.
>>>>
>>>>Best,
>>>>Jeff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                        Richard
>>>>                        Shapiro              To:     Rob
>Bradley/Corp/Enron
>>>>                                             cc:     Jeff
>>>>Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
>>>>                        06/08/2001           Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
>>>>                        10:05 AM             Subject:     Re: Economist
>>>>Letter(Document link:
>>>>                                             Jeff Dasovich)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Are we making any progress on this yet?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Rob Bradley
>>>>06/01/2001 10:31 AM
>>>>
>>>>To:   Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
>>>>cc:   Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
>>>>
>>>>Subject:  Re: Economist Letter
>>>>
>>>>Here is some information on an option for us to have this Oakland-based
>>>>free market think tank do an open letter against price caps on
>>electricity
>>>>signed by a bevy of economists.  Probably should have done something
>like
>>>>this already but might still be worth doing.
>>>>
>>>>I have a query in to David to get a breakdown of the $30,000 for print
>>>>media buys and such and have not heard back, but I wanted to get this
>>>>information to you anyway.
>>>>
>>>>- Rob
>>>>
>>>>----- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 05/31/2001 09:29 AM -----
>>>>
>>>>                        David Theroux
>>>>                        <DTheroux@indepe        To:
>>Rob.Bradley@enron.com
>>>>                        ndent.org>              cc:
>>>>                                                Subject:     Re:
>Economist
>>>Letter
>>>>                        05/30/2001 08:17
>>>>                        PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dear Rob,
>>>>
>>>>Thank you for your note.
>>>>
>>>>Here incidentally is a link to the page on our web site regarding our
>>>>Open Letter last year critiquing price controls on health care.
>>>>(This was the third such Open Letter we have done.)
>>>>http://independent.org/tii/Research/GuideHealthCareIssues.html
>>>>
>>>>The last time we did this it cost us about $30,000.
>>>>
>>>>If we could line up the funding, we could proceed.
>>>>
>>>>Please advise me with questions.
>>>>
>>>>Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>David
>>>>
>>>>David J. Theroux
>>>>Founder and President
>>>>The Independent Institute
>>>>100 Swan Way
>>>>Oakland, CA 94621-1428
>>>>510-632-1366 Phone
>>>>510-568-6040 Fax
>>>>DTheroux@independent.org
>>>>http://www.independent.org
>>>>
>>>>>There might be some interest around here to help fund an anti-price cap
>>>>>letter or survey from members of the American Economics Association on
>>>>>price caps and what to do about the California power crisis.  I believe
>>>>you
>>>>>have done this sort of thing before on some other economics issues.
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you want to price this out and test the waters to see if some others
>>>>>want to join in an effort?
>>>>>
>>>>>- Rob
>>>>>
>>>>>Robert L. Bradley Jr.
>>>>>Director, Public Policy Analysis
>>>>>Enron Corp.
>>>>>P.O Box 1188, Room 4741c
>>>>>[1400 Smith Street 77002]
>>>>>Houston, Texas 77251-1188
>>>>>
>>>>>(P) 713-853-3062
>>>>>(F) 713-646-4702
>>>>>
>>>>>Assistant: Joan Stransky 713-853-7431
>>>>>jstrans@enron.com
>>
>>--
>>David J. Theroux
>>Founder and President
>>The Independent Institute
>>100 Swan Way
>>Oakland, CA 94621-1428
>>510-632-1366 Phone
>>510-568-6040 Fax
>>DTheroux@independent.org
>>http://www.independent.org
>
>--
>David J. Theroux
>Founder and President
>The Independent Institute
>100 Swan Way
>Oakland, CA 94621-1428
>510-632-1366 Phone
>510-568-6040 Fax
>DTheroux@independent.org
>http://www.independent.org


Attached is clean and blacklined copies of the revised memorandum on the
Barton Bill.  Cynthia would like to schedule a conference call to discuss
this on Wednesday or Thursday.
 <<Blackline of Barton Bill (Word).DOC>>  <<Memo re Barton Bill (Word).DOC>>

 - Blackline of Barton Bill (Word).DOC
 - Memo re Barton Bill (Word).DOC


marketrelations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear Market Participants:

The NYISO back-up dispatch system is scheduled to be tested on Tuesday,
December 5.    The test will begin at about 10:30 a.m. and last for
approximately one hour.

Security Constrained Dispatch (SCD) will be stopped, but the mainframe
computer
will
continue to operate, allowing the NYISO to monitor security.  If a situation
occurs, the
Shift Supervisor will be able to re-start SCD and take appropriate action.
The
Market
Information System (MIS) and Balancing Market Evaluation (BME) will remain
available
during the test.

If you have any questions, please call Customer Relations  at 518-356-6060.


Sally,

Below is the listing of my staff and their Extensions.

 David Maxwell  3-6983
 Susie Ayala  3-0524  On Vacation in Houston
 Tim Norton  3-6820
 Homer Lin  5-7642  On Vacation in Seattle
 Lynn Tippery  3-5333

 Joseph Koothrappaly 3-6819  IT
 Carol Marshall  3-4291  Commercial Liaison

Call if you need anything more,
Todd


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 08:39 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	06/21/2000 08:39 AM

		 To: jason.peter@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Differences

Jason:  Please stay in touch with Sarah.  We really do need to finalize with
Bank One by Friday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 08:38 AM -----

	Sarah Wesner@ENRON
	06/20/2000 07:24 PM

		 To: Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Differences

Joe - attached is a first shot at getting a handle on all the differences
between the proposed and existing margin lines.  I plan to do more analysis
with respect to covenants and warranties but this hits the main points.  The
analysis between rates will be very complex and may be something best left to
the research Group.  We can go through why this is such a complex issue to
model.  What I do plan to do is update historical info. so that based on the
past we can make general statements such as over time Fed Funds + X bp <,>,=
to LIBOR + X bp.

A quick synapses of difficult items:

Commissions vs. Margin lines - will trading desk use facility for many trades
or less frequent trades for smaller amounts
Short on Financial gas vs. Long on physical gas - cash flow differentials and
how we can model the cost of cash to fund the working capital (as you
explained to me today)
What positions the trader take and how our equity position is at that exact
time.  Will we trade in a similar fashion in the future?

From what I understand the trading desks do not have ready access to the
above  information in a format which lends itself to modelling of reasonable
complexity or do not wish to share it with us (understandable considering the
sensitive nature of the business.)  The ideal situation would be for the
desks to decide themselves whether a line makes sense for them based on the
pricing provided.  As mentioned above, I believe that we should be able to
explain why a certain base rate would be attractive but am not sure how to
estimate the value of a line to the traders without detailed information.
Perhaps the best division of labour would be for the desks to decide what
loan would be most valuable based on the desk's trading patterns while we
could focus on getting the line in place as quickly as possible.  If you
disagree, please let me know and I will try to rethink how to model this
appropriately.

Sarah


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,
Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are forced or rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these outages.
In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is formatted like your daily deliveries you receive nightly. This will enable you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.
Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.
 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 111501.xls
 - 111501R.xls


Any problems with this counterparty?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 04:54 PM -----

	Kevin Montagne/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/30/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Mark S Palmer/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: NDA for BEA Systems, Inc.

Mark, below is the information you requested.

Business Contact
Mike Thack
Senior Director of Sales, Western Area
972-943-5161 (office)
972-658-5603 (cell)
972-943-5050 (fax)
mike.thack@beasys.com

Mike, is working on getting together the right BEA people. He doubts he can
arrange the people for a meeting when the team is in CA this week.

Thanks,
Kevin Montagne
x31903

-----Original Message-----
From: Palmer, Mark S.
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 5:05 PM
To: Shelby, Rex; Montagne, Kevin
Cc: Jones, Tana
Subject: NDA for BEA Systems, Inc.

Hi Rex & Kevin--

In order to send out the BEA NDA,
Tana Jones needs the info asterisked (*) below.
Could one of you verify the info below and send her the missing info?

Thanks,
Mark P.

Legal name of the company:
 BEA Systems, Inc.

* Business contact name at the company (who will receive the NDA):

* Business contact email & phone (& fax, if applicable):

Company's address:
 2315 N. 1st Street
 San Jose, CA 95131

Nature of discussion:
 Project Offline

NDA delivery method:
 Email

Other delivery needed? (hard copy sent by mail, Fedex, fax):
 No

* Legal contact at the company (optional but helpful):


We have discovered an ingenious new problem plaguing the CA scheduling
spreadsheet.  I do not know how this happened, but here is the symptom.  You
open a spreadsheet and you see a little version number behind the name like 1
or 2.  For example:

ca1212.xls:1
ca1212.xls:2

Sometimes you may see a file's name several times under Window as if you
somehow have several copies of the same spreadsheet open.  This apparently
results from selecting Window > New Window.  Never, ever select New Window!
I repeat: NEVER, EVER SELECT NEW WINDOW!  Once a worksheet has this version
number it is "contaminated" and all sorts of other problems appear.  I'm sure
you have noticed new errors popping up when you open or close one of these
files.

I am going to create a new worksheet for the 13th from an older file that
does not have one of these version numbers.  And we will hope this doesn't
happen again.  Please be careful with this.  It sounds trivial but can in
fact really screw things up.


Thanks for your note.  I hope that things are going well for you at EBS.  I
know that it must be busy.  --Sally

Richard Weeks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
01/16/2001 08:04 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Sally:
Long time no see.

Wanted to congratulate you on your recent promotion.  Way to go.

Richard Weeks
ENRON BROADBAND SERVICES
PURCHASING PROCESSING MANAGER
OFFICE:713-853-6995
   CELL:713-516-2581
EMAIL:RICHARD_WEEKS@ENRON.NET


Bankruptcy 101

In an effort to educate employees about the nuts and bolts of bankruptcy, Enron is sponsoring five Bankruptcy 101 sessions next week. These sessions will focus on the basics of the bankruptcy process in general (not Enron specific).

When:	 Monday, January 28th - Friday, February 1st  from noon until 1:00 daily
Where:  5C2 in Enron Center North

Each session is limited to 50 participants, so you must RSVP if you would like to attend. Simply select a button above to indicate the date you would like to attend. You will then be sent a confirmation email. Note: This does not automatically post your calendar.  The sessions will be filling up quickly--so don't delay in reserving your spot!


Chris,

I haven't heard when they expect to have their financing.  We are finishing
up the break out contract with GE, and assuming we tender it tomorrow, they
will have until April 19th to fund the escrow.

Kay

Christopher F Calger@ECT
04/09/2001 05:27 PM
To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: turbine swap

Steve and Kay,

How are things going with Delta?  I want to push them hard to close.

Regards,

Chris


Should we stop withdrawing?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 07:11
AM ---------------------------

Angie Zeman@ENRON
03/10/2000 01:57 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Storage Ratchets -- Enron North America

---------------------- Forwarded by Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron on 03/10/2000
01:54 PM ---------------------------

Ora_L_Ash@CNGT.CNG.COM on 03/10/2000 12:58:40 PM
To: MLAFUZE@ECT.ENRON.COM, Angie.Zeman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Storage Ratchets -- Enron North America

     As of  March 8, 2000,  the Storage Gas Balance for Contract 530586 was
2,944 dekatherms or 21%  full.

     CNG Transmission Corporation

?s (CNGT) Rate Schedule GSS,  Section 8.4
provides that if Storage Gas Balance is less than or equal to 16%, then CNGT?s
obligation to make deliveries from storage shall be reduced by 30%.
Therefore,
when Storage Gas Balance falls below 16% or 2,236 dekatherms,  CNGT?s
obligation
to make deliveries from this storage account shall be reduced from 210
dekatherms to 160 dekatherms.

     Please review,  monitor, and if necessary, adjust the storage withdrawals
to avoid overruns and the resulting penalties as provided in Section 35.3B of
the General Terms and Conditions.  If you have any questions, please feel free
to contact me at 304-623-8546.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.


Michelle,

Kristin Walsh, a manager in Competitive Analysis, is returning from maternity leave on October 15th.  During Kristin's absence, the following changes have occurred in the group, and I just wanted to run them by you before we communicate them to her:
1)  Kristin will only have two direct reports instead of three.
2) Previously, Kristin's team as a whole was responsible for providing ENA (i.e. John and Louise, as well as traders) with competitive intelligence.  Instead of Kristen just overseeing the ENA process as a whole, Kristin and her two team members will have more specific duties, although Kristin will still be the primary point of contact for ENA.  Specifically, Kristin will gather and provide intelligence info for the Gas Team, and Kelly Holman will gather and provide info for East Power, and  Greg Whitman will do the same for West Power.  Robert Johnston, Kristin's supervisor,  and Scott Tholan, BUL, just felt like the level of service that Kristin's team was providing was not adequate because efforts were duplicated and Kristin could not provide enough "face time" with the head traders to gather and relay info, as well as directing her team.

Also,after Kristin's departure, it was learned that Kristen signed a contract for which she had no authority. Although Scott does not think that this has happened before, this particular contract blew up in their face.

Upon Kristin's return, Scottt, Robert, and I would like to communicate these changes to her (not in writing, just verbally), and just reitterate the fact that only Scott has the authority to sign contracts.  Additionally, we would like to tell Kristin that she needs to take a management training class so that she can learn to delegate and oversee responsibilities of the group, rather than micromanaging them.  Please let me know if this is going to create any additional problems, or if I need to take a different approach.

As always, thanks for your help.
Anne


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

The equity in your Datek Online trading account has fallen below our
margin maintenance requirements.  This results in a 'margin
maintenance call' that requires you to either make an immediate
payment or to close out some of your portfolio.  If your account
is not restored to its required equity by three business days from today,
portions of your portfolio may be liquidated.  Furthermore,
Datek Online reserves the right to take action at ANY time
with or without notice if market conditions warrant.

Your current margin call is as follows:

Userid =CAMPB54792
$1836.61

When funding your account, we strongly recommend that you send any payments by
overnight delivery.  Otherwise, your deposit may not be received in time to
satisfy
this call.  Please make checks payable to Datek Online and please include your
username or account number on the face of your check before mailing to...

iClearing LLC
Attn: Margin Dept.
100 Wood Avenue South
Iselin, NJ 08830-2716

If we can provide you with further information please contact the Datek Online
Customer Support Team at 1-888-U2-Datek or 1-732-635-7500 or email
margin@datek.com.
Thank you.

Sincerely,
Margin Department
iClearing LLC
Member NASD/SIPC


I apologize for not including you in this email yesterday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001
08:56 AM ---------------------------

Janel Guerrero
04/02/2001 06:43 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, bhansen@lhom.com,
hgovenar@govadv.com, sgovenar@govadv.com, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron,
Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, ken@kdscommunications.com, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Samuel Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron,
dlugar@quinngillespie.com, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, cc: Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Ken Lay packet to CA Businesses - Round 2

The following set of materials were sent last night to our 115 targeted
businesses.


I have your travelers Checks.  Are you mobile yet?


Start Date: 4/14/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041423.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SPP
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: NCPA
  PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:  46.92 / Final:  46.89)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Lia Hernandez, currently of ET&S, has accepted a position at ENA effective
August 2, 2000.  To ensure that ET&S continues to be in compliance with the
marketing affiliate rules, Lia's access to any ET&S or GPG-related LANs or
applications should be removed at the close of business on August 1.  In
addition, Lia's email profile should be changed and any GPG or ET&S mass
distribution  lists should be changed.

Please send a reply email to me after these changes have been completed,
verifying and indicating the date that employee was:
- removed from the LAN
- EBB password was changed/canceled (if applicable)
- removed from ET&S or GPG-related applications
- email post office box was transfered.

If you have questions, or if you believe there is someone else I need to
contact in order to accomplish the above, please let me know.


Thanks.  Its nice to hear a kind word every once in a while.  Its been a
tough quarter.  Im glad we are making progress in this area, it is a priority.

Mike


14-May	15-May	16-May	17-May	18-May	21-May	22-May	23-May	24-May	25-May	29-May	30-May	31-May	1-Jun
Aluminum	6	13	7	0	0	7	7	8	2	0	4	6	12	8
Copper	2	3	3	5	5	14	8	2	5	1	1	4	3	2
Gas	3	3	15	5	6	14	19	8	5	8	12	6	5	3
Total	11	19	25	10	11	35	34	18	12	9	17	16	20	13

Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore the number of gas transactions for June 1 is 6 etc.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Whitt, Mark; Grigsby, Mike; Allen, Phillip K.
Cc:	Polsky, Phil; Moon, Eric
Subject:	JM Huber Transaction- Confidential

Further to our conversation please find attached the curves on the JM Huber transaction that we have agreed to work off of. The 30,000/day of capacity will sit on the books until next week but the deal with HUBER is effectively completed. In the event that this deal does not close, then the West desk will resume with the same MTM risks that you presently have.

Any curve shift positive from now until the transaction is actually unwound will be credited back to the orig desk and any negative curve shift from here on in will be credited to the trading desk... plus ENA Orig and trading will work on a sharing calculation payable for any future deals.

In addition to the transportation income being generated, additional orig will be generated by entering into wellhead and market based transactions with the desks. I believe that all of the risks and discussions associated with the structures have been well communicated with each book ( by Mark Whitt ) and we will be meeting with each of you early next week to get the structures and booking set up properly.

I trust that this note covers the general areas related to this deal and I am very pleased with the high level of cooperation shown by everyone..

Pls review file and if there are any questions give me a call.

BT


This should be so much easier; Foti is not cooperating so I am having to
spend time hunting down his Co. # and RC #, which hopefully Estalee will be
able to provide.  I reiterate my position that lawyers are not the ones who
should have to do this.  Rest assured I'll follow through on this one and Lia
Hernandez, but I also feel we need to approach Dave Schafer and ask why this
is something HR is not capable of taking care of.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 07/26/2000
04:22 PM ---------------------------

	From:  CAC ITSG                           07/24/2000 09:22 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Employee transfer

 Effective date:   7/31/00
 Type of action:   Transfer In:                      Transfer Out:
XX               Delete:
 Home domain/LAN (if known):
 Social Security Number:
 Phone:    Room:
 Co #:    RC #:

Please provide the information above so that we may process this request.  If
you have any questions, feel freel to call me at 33270.

Chris

	From:  Susan Scott                           07/21/2000 03:53 PM

To: CAC ITSG/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Houston Helpdesk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Employee transfer

David Foti, currently of ET&S, has accepted a position at EES effective
August 1, 2000.  To ensure that ET&S continues to be in compliance with the
marketing affiliate rules, Dave's access to any ET&S or GPG-related LANs or
applications should be removed at the close of business on July 31.  In
addition, Dave's email profile should be changed and any GPG or ET&S mass
distribution  lists should be changed.

Please send a reply email to me after these changes have been completed,
verifying and indicating the date that employee was:
- removed from the LAN
- EBB password was changed/canceled (if applicable)
- removed from ET&S or GPG-related applications
- email post office box was transfered.

If you have questions, or if you believe there is someone else I need to
contact in order to accomplish the above, please let me know.


The bridgeback will take care of changing the volumes from the 1st.

D

Tom Acton@ENRON
03/10/2000 11:17 AM
To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Well head

Patty Boling from Vintage called and wanted to know why her nom was at 630
for the first when it should be 320.  This was one of the ones that the
system pushed the Jan numbers over.   We have it changed back to the 320 from
the 9th on due you want me to change the volumes from the 1st to  the 8th
from 630 to 320. Let me know.


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042822.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/28/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Dear Mr. May-

I am writing to request that West U postpone the planned work at Colonial Park until late May 2002.  Over 50 girls (ages 6-8) involved in the West U Softball Association practice at the field in the park from February through May every year.  WUSA would have a very hard time finding a replacement field at this late notice, especially anything close to West U.  What harm would it do to delay the City's plans until the summer?  West U prides itself on being a city focused on community and families.  What's more community-minded than allowing youth sports to practice on public park space??

Sincerely,

Susan Pereira
713-349-8836


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
01:52 PM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               01/25/2001 09:49 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--1/25/01


Attached is a revised draft of the letter to Jerrel Branson.


Melissa,

I still need to return the prior PG&E guarantees referenced below to the
counterparty.  Were you having them pulled?
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/16/99 11:06 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           06/07/99 11:46 AM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Nella
Cappelletto/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Need Documents

In connection with the execution of the new ISDA Master Agreements between
ECT and ECT Canada and PG&E Energy Trading Gas Corporation and PG& E Energy
Trading, Canada Corporation, we, and they, will be issuing  new "umbrella"
guarantees that will cover all transactions between the above entities and
also cover EPMI and PG&E Energy Trading - Power, L.P. and CEG Energy Options
Inc. (a PG&E affiliate)  These new guarantees will cover all physical,
financial and power transactions between the above parties.  I have sent them
the original of my Enron Corp. Guaranty for $105,000,000 and have received in
the original of the PG&E Corporation Guaranty for $100,000,000.  Rod is
resolving whether we agreed to increase the Enron Corp. guaranty to $110mm.

In connection with the issuance of the new bilateral guarantees I need to
return to them the originals of the following PG&E guarantees:  (1) PG&E
Corporation Guarantee dated as of March 28, 1998 covering business between
Enron Power Marketing, Inc. and PG&E Energy Trading - Power, L.P., (2) PG&E
Corporation Guarantee dated as of June 5, 1998 in favor of Enron Power
Marketing, Inc. covering physical transactions, and (3) PG&E Energy Trading
Corporation Guaranty dated March 11, 1997 covering physical business with ECT
Canada.

I will also be returning to you the returned originals of the Enron Corp.
Prior Guarantees.


Summary Risk Data as of 11/21/2001

Active Financial Deals	83
Active Physical Positions	38
P&L  Daily ($thousands)	41.0
VaR ($thousands)	166.5

ETS Margin Account Deals	0

Physical deals modeled in the Caminus Zainet system are deals which have some form of price risk, (i.e. Index to index deals, and anticipated fuel sales) This does not include standard transport or storage agreements.

P&L  Daily:   Daily change in the  mark-to-market (MTM) valuation of all deals being tracked in the Caminus Zainet system.  This includes the origination and changes in value for both the physical and financial sides of hedges, along with any speculative trades and floating unhedged physical positions.

VaR is "Value at Risk":  Enron Corp policy defines this as the maximum expected one day loss on the portfolio given a 95% statistical confidence interval.  This number is currently calculated on the Caminus system using a variance covariance methodology, rather than a Monte Carlo simulation per the Enron Corp policy.

More detailed reports are available from the Caminus Zainet risk management system.  Please call Vince Strohmeyer at 713.853.6701 with any questions you may have.


Vlady

Thanks for the update.

Come and see me Tuesday, I ned some help on South America.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gorny, Vladimir
Sent:	Friday, February 16, 2001 2:50 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Week in Review

Breaking News: US is bombing Iraq on Friday. Crude is up $0.35 , Gas is up $0.06, after hours.
ENE is down to $75-76 in the last few days (allegedly, Fortune Magazine is coming out with a negative article on Enron)
Gas VaR limit is $76 MM until 2/22 ($61 MM thereafter), Power VaR limit is $54 MM.

Gas

Weekly P&L - $79 MM (of which $87 MM is on the West Desk)
VaR as of 2/15 - $55 MM (mostly West and Financial Desks)

Two large down moves on Nymex of about $0.50 during the week, the curve flattened significantly and the 01 strip moves in-tact now, for the most part. Socal prices increased substantially to ~$25-30 for Feb and ~$14-15 for Mar.

Most traders have flattened their books, except for the following two trades:

- West Desk is long Socal Feb/Mar (Feb @ ~$25 and Mar @~$9.50). There is a great deal of bullish sentiments: PG&E hit the "90% rule", San Onofre plant   may stay off-line for quite some time and the 6-10 day forecast calls for Much Below weather in So. California.
- Financial Desk is preserving the Oct-01 length. Arnold argues that the end of the season is the best contract to hold - it moves up with the front on up moves and holds value on the down moves (I think he is right). He did a good job of hedging around this position.

Deals:	closed KCS Energy VPP deal on 2/16 - adds about 4,000 contracts of HH gas for 2001-2006 and about $4 MM of incremental VaR to the floor.

East Power

Weekly P&L - <$4.6> MM
VaR as of 2/15 - $22 MM (down from $35 MM)

The desk took off a lot of positions on Thursday ("chopped a lot of wood") - Presto wants to stay flexible and mobile, and have the opportunity to go either way (long or short) if market conditions change.

Deals:	unwinding Dayton P&L  for $13 MM cash, short 100 MWs of 4-hour calls (a hairy deal, out-of-the money ~$15 MM)
	submitting an indicative bid on 2/16 to TNMP for a full-requirements power deal in Ercot

West Power

Weekly P&L - $44 MM
VaR as of 2/15 - $22 MM (down from $35 MM)

The desk has been taking off some of their length in CA. Most of the risk on the desk comes from Long positions in Cal 03/04 and the Longs in 01. The outlook in the West is bullish, consistent with the gas story.

Deals:	negotiating a monetization with Avista ~$66 MM) - Enron delivers 25 MWs @ MidC 3/01-2/02 and receives 83 MWs 2/02-12/03 from Avista

Canada

Weekly P&L - $2 MM
VaR as of 2/15 - $20 MM

Southern Cone

Weekly P&L - $1.7 MM (new deals)
VaR as of 2/15 - $2 MM (increased from $0.3 MM)

Deals: 	executed 2 external deals with Gerasul and CGN Energia: bought 500,000 Mwhs for Cal 01/02.

EES

Reduced VaR from $12 MM to just over  $5 MM this week - taking off length in the West in 01 and further out.

PS. Honored to have had the opportunity to manage you book last week - great learning experience. Also, makes me appreciate more the job of all the guys on the desk.

Vlady.


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for QCOM  follows from EquityAlert.com.     Form 144: Filing to Sell 200 Shares of QUALCOMM INC (QCOM)   Jan 16, 2002 (Vickers Stock Research via COMTEX) --   Document Processing Date: January 16, 2002  Filer: NATURE CONSERVANCY Relation:   Stock Name: QUALCOMM INC Stock CUSIP: 747525103  Stock Symbol: QCOM Exchange: NASDAQ  Transaction date: December 11, 2001 Shares for sale: 200 Value held: $12500  Broker: SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC  Copyright (c) 2002, Vickers Stock Research Corporation. All rights reserved.  -0-       [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***  At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Power Option PLUS Logo    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]


Kate for our deal 582589 and 582423 these deals according to Bloomberg the
fee should be $15.00.  Please pass on to Mark and Tom.

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001
04:15 PM ---------------------------

"PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on 04/17/2001
03:46:36 PM
To: Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Commission

That is the commission for those trades. The rate that Bloomberg Powermatch
now charges for cash trades is $15 per trade.

----- Original Message -----
From: Evelyn Metoyer  <Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com>
At:  4/17 16:43

>
>
> For the two deals traded on yesterday with Tom and Mark the fee is showing
> as $15.00 flat on both confirmations.  Can you send revisions.
> The numbers are 20010416410003 and 20010416410002
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> "PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on
> 04/17/2001 03:25:00 PM
>
> To:   Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Re: Commission
>
>
> That is not the case. I know what Mark and Tom trade, I apologize if I
> misspoke. All daily trades, as well as hourly trades will now be a flat fee
> charge of $15 per trade. This covers any size transaction.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Evelyn Metoyer  <Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com>
> At:  4/17 16:20
>
> >
> > Tom and Mark are not spot traders, they're cash traders. The Real Time
> guys
> > are now being charged $15 for trades - but cash and term traders should
> > still be charged the traditional $.005.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on
> > 04/17/2001 02:28:57 PM
> >
> > To:   Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
> > cc:
> >
> > Subject:  Commission
> >
> >
> > Evelyn, as of April 16, 2001 our charge for Spot trades is a flat fee of
> > $15/trade.


Steve, we received a request from METI in Tokyo last Friday to arrange a
meeting in Houston for Mr Hirata from METI to discuss gas issues. The meeting
was largely driven by the travel schedule of Mr Hirata rather than a specific
need to meet with Enron. I query whether this is the same enquiry, via a
different channel, that you mentioned this morning. We asked Robert
Neustaedter to meet with Mr Hirata. The meeting took place today in Houston.

In any event, I attach a copy of a presentation given by Joe to METI last
month which reflects our current thinking on gas issues in Japan.

I will let you know what the outcome of the Houston meeting.

kind regards

---------------------- Forwarded by Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron on 05/02/2001
04:38 PM ---------------------------

Robert Neustaedter@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/27/2001 11:54 PM
To: Mark Crowther/AP/Enron@ENRON
cc: Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Visit by METI Director

Mark,

I would be happy to share Enron's US regulatory experience with Mr. Hirata.
May 2 would probably work better for me, if possible.  If you could advise on
issues specific to Mr. Hirata's interests, that would  allow me to gather any
information that may be of relevance and provide a more focused discussion.

Thanks
Robert

	Mark Crowther@ENRON
	04/27/2001 12:47 AM

		 To: robert.neustaedter@enron.com
		 cc: Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Visit by METI Director

Robert,

I am writing to see whether you can help us out with a sudden request that we
have had from the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). A
Mr. Hirata, Director of Oil and Natural Gas Division, Resources and Fuel
Department in METI is in Houston early next week and would like to visit
Enron to talk about gas market and pipeline investment issues. He is not
responsible for gas deregulation but plays a role in the potential
development of a gas pipeline into northern Japan from Russia (the Sakhalin
line), bearing some relation therefore to E-Power's (Enron asset development
subsidiary in Japan) plans for a gas-fired power plant in the North.

Would it be possible for you to meet him informally for an hour on 1 or 2
May? We appreciated the amount of work that you put into the presentation for
our main METI gas contact Mr. Ueda last year. This time, we would not expect
a formal presentation from you, given the short notice and our limited
contact with Mr. Hirata. Also, Mr. Hirata appears happy just to discuss
issues informally.

For your information, I attach a presentation that Joe Hirl made at a recent
Government gas deregulation committee explaining Enron's views on
deregulation of the Japanese gas market. I'm sure you will recognize a number
of the slides.

Could you let me know of the possibility of this meeting? I will also try to
phone you later to answer any comments you may have. Thank you for your help.

Best regards
Mark Crowther
Manager, Public Affairs
Enron Japan


The industry quote below is interesting.  I have a call in to Bob to ask him
to get you key measurements on EOL business to date.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000 03:46 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Bob Shults                           01/06/2000 01:40 PM

To: Sally Beck
cc:
Subject: Press quote

---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000 01:39 PM
---------------------------

David Forster
01/06/2000 12:25 PM
To: Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, Product Control - Houston, Product Control -
London, EOL Call Center, Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Kearton/LON/ECT@ECT, Lydia Cannon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rahil Jafry/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Press quote

I thought some of you might like to see the following press quote, which was
taken from a UK daily natural gas publication today. It nicely sums up
EnronOnline:

"A new web based trading service drew significant levels of interest......One
trader says he did "50 or 60 deals on EnronOnline.  "There's nothing
fundamentally better about the form of trading", he says, "but they're always
there, they're firm, and they don't go into a meeting for an hour."" -
Petroleum Argus Ltd

Dave


Outlook Migration Team
05/14/2001 01:02 PM
To: Elena Chilkina/Enron@EnronXGate, Jose Marquez/Enron@EnronXGate, Kevin G
Moore/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike A Roberts/Enron@EnronXGate, Tony
Hamilton/EU/Enron@Enron, William Smith/Enron@EnronXGate, Alan
McGaughy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy Burrell/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, James
Posway/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Maritta Mullet/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Mitcham/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Brian Swinford/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Jones/GasPlant/TS/ECT@ECT, Bob Brandt/NA/Enron@Enron, Charles
Upshaw/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harvey Mitchell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Henry Terech/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken N
Byrd/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Gray/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty
Gourley/NA/Enron@Enron, Stan Jablonski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tara
Soyal/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adrian Ausucua/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian
Zatarain/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carol Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Denise Almoina/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Denka
Wangdi/NA/Enron@Enron, Eduardo Robles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Elio Tortolero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Felicia
Legier/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Frances Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana L
Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joy
Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kari
Duncan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Sparks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lisa B Alderman/NA/Enron@Enron,
Maria Alejandra Romero/SA/Enron@Enron, Mariella
Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rudolf
Bond/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sean
Long/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Jernigan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Hirsh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Timothy B
Rebhorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Veronica Medrano/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Veronica Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, Wendi
Hoelscher/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yen
Nguyen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lia
Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy
Wood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nikita Ford/NA/Enron@Enron, Amy
Villasenor/OTS/Enron@Enron, Debra Young/OTS/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Arnold/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John Reese/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Josh
Mayes/OTS/Enron@Enron, Larry Fenstad/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Adleman/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ann Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Lynne
Dix/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike Thomas/OTS/Enron@Enron, Morris
Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rinetia Turner/OTS/Enron@Enron, Robert
Geheb/OTS/Enron@Enron, Tyrone Brown/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Billy
Dorsey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Earl Hailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lena Lacey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Office of the
Chairman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Keepers/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne
Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridget Fraser/NY/ECT@ECT,
John Haggerty/Corp/Enron@Enron, Murdoch Morrison/NY/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-16-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish,
simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey
will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:        Jeffrey K. Skilling

Login ID:  jskilli

Extension:  x3-6894

Office Location:  EB5007

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Desktop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  Yes, Palm Pilot

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  No
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  Yes
    If yes, who?  Sherri Sera, Joannie Williamson
Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  No
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  Yes
    If yes, who?  Sherri Sera, Joannie Williamson

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  No
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?  No
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From: 8:00a     To:      6:00p

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? No
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


when are we going to gather up and discuss?

---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Quick/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 01:17 PM
---------------------------
From: Mark Whitt@ENRON on 10/03/2000 12:03 PM MDT
Sent by: Mark Whitt@ENRON
To: Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, kcrisa@apex2000.net, Joan
Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Staab/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul T
Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Crescendo Noms into NWPL

I spoke with Kent Harris at Wildhorse today and he stated there position to
me on a few things.

1.  Our Interruptible noms to NWPL for Wed. were not cut due to contractual
reasons, we were cut due to a lack of capacity.  He said that the San Arroyo
#2 compressor was down and without it they cannot make additional deliveries
to NWPL.  They hope to have it up by friday and will try to provide us some
capacity into NWPL.

2.  Kent reiterated their position regarding our contract by stating that
"the intent of the original contract was not to take gas through other
systems other than the Mesa system".  In addition he stated that we do not
have the right to choose which pipeline our gas is delivered to.

3.  He also asked whether or not we were willing to negotiate on the current
situation or if we wanted to let the 'lawyers fight it out".  I reiterated
that we have been waiting for them to either acknowledge that they will
gather the entrada gas under the current contract or provide us with another
alternative.  Absent either of those 2 things happening all we can do is try
to live by the existing agreement.  He stated that they have new estimates on
the cost to construct a new line through the South Canyon and it is
approximately $1MM less than their original esitmate.

We left it that he would determine whether or not they would gather  the
Entrada under the existing contract or make a new proposal that would most
likely wrap the Entrada and Dakota up under one new deal and replace the
existing contract.

I told him we would determine whether or not we wanted to "let the lawyers
fight over the existing contract" or work on a new deal for all the
production.

P.S.  They are still very interested in some type of Joint Venture.

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 10/03/2000 11:07 AM -----

	Theresa Staab
	10/03/2000 09:21 AM

		 To: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Nicole Cortez/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven P
South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacqueline P Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey J
Brewer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Crescendo Noms into NWPL

Liz Orr with Wildhorse just called to inform me we cannot nominate into
NWPL.   Her legal department has informed her there are issues with the
contract and until they inform her otherwise, our gas can only flow into
Questar.   Physically, we can flow into NWPL but contractully we cannot.

We have changed the nominations back to Questar for tomorrow's gas day.

Sorry about that, (we tried)

Theresa


Wade,

 I understood your number one priority was to deal with your vehicle
situation.  You need to take care of it this week.  Lucy can't hold the
tenants to a standard (vehicles must be in running order with valid stickers)
if the staff doesn't live up to it.  If you decide to buy a small truck and
you want to list me as an employer for credit purposes, I will vouch for your
income.

Phillip


Hi Sara,

I met with accounting regarding these amounts. I will be forwarding a copy to
you.

We have a total of .77 cents remaining in our account with Cargill.

Since we have several acounts in addition to Crude Oil, it is my
recommendation that
we do not cancel the account as traders may want to utilize Cargill for other
commodities.

Regards,
David

From: Sara Shackleton on 05/25/2000 08:12 AM
To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: update

What were the dollar amounts on the printout that you sent to me?

	David P Dupre
	05/24/2000 06:06 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: update

Cargill said that we do not have a line of credit nor do we have money
sitting in an account with them.
The account is inactive at this time.

Let's review our next step when you have an opportunity.
Thanks
David


NICE!  HAVE A GOOD TIME

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gang, Lisa
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 12:22 PM
To:	Foster, Chris H.; Rawson, Lester; Cocke Jr., Stanley; Mehrer, Anna
Cc:	Semperger, Cara; Salisbury, Holden; Runswick, Stacy; Robinson, Donald
Subject:	vacation

I will be on vacation from Dec 3rd through Dec 12th.  I will be back in the office on Dec 13th.  Les will be covering for me with the Elpaso scheduling while I'm gone.

Lisa


Please Read the following from Kathy Neal-Mosley:
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Neal, Kathy
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:46 PM
To: Labbe, Anne
Subject: MID-YEAR PRC REMINDER

REMINDER   REMINDER   REMINDER   REMINDER   REMINDER

You need to suggest at least 5 reviewers, but no more than 7 to provide
feedback on your performance in the PEP system.  The PEP system closes on May
25, 2001 and all feedback must be completed on or before that date.

Please logon the PEP system to select your reviewers now.  This will give
your reviewers ample time to provide feedback on you.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at extension 57803.

Kathy Neal-Mosley
HR Manager
Office:  (713) 345-7803
Cell:     (713) 819-6766
Pager:  (877) 547-6065


Mom & Dad,

First off, what day do you guys fly out to Shanghai?  Is it the 5th or the
6th? (i.e. send me your flight info!)

Attached is Jenn and I's flight itinerary for the China Trip (see forwarded
msg below).  Gerald & Barbara, Dan, Gayle & Heather are also on the same
flight going over.  We changed from the original Shanghai round-trip plan to
save some money and avoided some logistic issues.....we are now flying into
Shanghai a little earlier and leaving from Beijing instead of
Shanghai............this allows us to avoid any domestic airline flights (a
good thing) as that can be expensive and makes the trip a little less hectic
in the beginning...so here's the tentative plan:

June 4th - Depart for China
June 5th - Arrive in Shanghai (Jon can you meet us in Shanghai on this day?)
June 6 & 7 sightseeing in Shanghai, June 7th Evening - take night train to
Chingdao (if there is one)
 - Meet up with Rodger & Sandy, et al., either in Shanghai or in Chingdao.
June 8th - Depart/Arrive in Chingdao
June 9th - Wedding Bliss & related activities.
June 10th - Sightseeing in Chingdao
June 11th - Depart for Beijing on Train
 (tentative departure date, we may want to stay around/see stuff in the
area/or something else on the way there, etc.?)
June 12th - June 15th: Beijing (Sightseeing, day trips, etc.)
June 16th - Depart from Beijing to Houston (Eric & Jenn, Gerald & Barbara.)
 Dan, Gayle & Heather are staying for another week in China, and I believe my
parents are staying another 3 or 4 days as well?

Jeff and Cathy are possibly going to switch their flight as well in order to
do this schedule.  This is of course a tentative/rough draft itinerary, &
nothing is set but our plane tickets.

Jon & Dan: I believe we are all looking to you guys to help us determine
exactly what we should look at and more importantly what we should and should
not eat.

Tiger penis soup anyone?!.........Looking forward to it,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 04:03 PM -----

	jennifer-gillaspie@reliantenergy.com
	04/10/2001 02:34 PM

		 To: Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com, jgillaspieci3@netzero.net,
gerald.nemec@enron.com
		 cc: djunk_epc@yahoo.com, gejunk@yahoo.com, hjunk@hotmail.com
		 Subject: China Itinerary

China Itinerary:

June 4
7:15 a.m. depart Houston to Detroit
Northwest flight 1888
11:17 arrive Detroit
12:30 depart Detroit to Shanghai
Northwest flight 89
3:10 p.m. on June 5 arrive Shanghai

June 16
9:40 a.m. depart Beijing to Tokyo
Northwest flight 12
2:20 p.m. arrive Tokyo
3:50 p.m. depart Tokyo to Houston
Continental flight 6
2 p.m. on June 16 arrive Houston


<meta name="description" content="The Computer Products Superstore. Supplying the world since 1984 with guaranteed lowest prices, huge inventory, easy ordering, and super fast service.">
<title>PROVANTAGE.COM : The Original Advantage</title>

<map name="FPMap0">
      <area href="http://www.provantage.com" shape="rect" coords="437, 3, 589, 43"></map>

          December 24, 2001

Can't
            read this email? Click
            here

          Issue#:
            e13112

To
            unsubscribe from the

            Original Advantage Click
      here

            (Do Not Reply to this email)

          PROVANTAGE
            Customer: jeff_dasovich@enron.com

<!VR>
<!EVR>

Products that
give you the Professional Advantage!

128MB SmartMedia Card
By Simple Technology

Not all SmartMedia cards are the same.

Simple Technology SmartMedia is designed to be 100% compliant with digital cameras, MP3 players & <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $56.46

FrontPage 2002 for Windows
By Microsoft

Purchase FrontPage 2000 by 6/30/01 & get Frontpage 2002 free! For complete details  <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $148.42

InstallShield Developer
By InstallShield

InstallShield Developer makes quick work of common installation tasks and dramatically increases efficiency, no matter how simple or complex the project <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $954.33

HomeSite v5.0
By Macromedia

A hand-coder's dream - developers create professional Web sites fast with the code-editing features of Macromedia HomeSite 5. Effortlessly validate, reuse, <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $86.77

McAfee VirusScan Professional
By McAfee

McAfee VirusScan Professional technology enables your PC to detect and remove all types of known viruses from any source-including email attachments, Internet <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $41.23

VS-7P 17in CRT Monitor
By KDS

Employs FD Trinitron technology for high end graphics use. Representing the latest in monitor technology. Offers 16.0 viewable inches of flat screen viewing <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $119.74

ME102 Wireless Access Point
By NETGEAR

NETGEAR's ME102 802.11b Wireless Access Point gives your wireless mobile workforce continuous, high-speed 11 Mpbs access to corporate network resources, <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $141.18

Jukebox Portable 6GB MP3 player
By Archos Technology

The ARCHOS Jukebox Recorder is the first, portable MP3 recorder and 6GB Hard Drive, which gives you real-time, on-the-fly recording of up to 6 000 minutes <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $306.27

All-In-Wonder Radeon AGP 32MB NTSC
By ATI Technologies

32MB Of DDR RAM, Fast 3D Graphics & DVD playback make it the best price/performance in its class. With All-in-Wonder Radeon, capture and edit MPEG-2 Video <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $157.27

KVM Switch Cable Kit PS/2 6-Foot
By Linksys

The Linksys ProConnect CPU Switch Cables allow you to effortlessly connect a computer's monitor, keyboard, and mouse to the Linksys ProConnect CPU Switch. <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $14.96

ORiNOCO Turbo 11 Gold Wireless PCCard NIC 4588-811
By Agere Systems

The same ORiNOCO PC card can be used worldwide for the Enterprise, ISP, Public Access or Home/SOHO markets using any of the ORiNOCO access point infrastructure <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $99.41

New Listing!

WinTV-PVR USB MPEG2 FM Stereo Radio
By Hauppauge

Watch and record your TV shows with instant replay and program pause
Burn your favorite TV shows onto CD-ROM and play them on your home DVD player
Includes <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $172.98

New!

PenCam 2 for USB
By Aiptek

3-in-1 XGA camera! 2.5 times bigger picture resolution than the PenCam Trio VGA For USB & Windows 2000, 98, Me & XP.

Built-In <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $63.92

New Listing!

Internal 56K/14.4K V.92 Performance Pro Faxmodem
By U.S. Robotics

The U.S. Robotics 56K Performance Pro Modem brings home and small business users the superior performance of controller-based online communication for <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $66.24

SyncMaster 170T 17in LCD Flat Panel Display
By Samsung

The advanced functionality of this digital/analog monitor, with a full 17" viewable display, makes any task enjoyable. Feel the power of Samsung's superior <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $804.89

TFT5030 15in TFT 2-Tone
By Compaq

Monitor users in space-constrained environments appreciate the flexible design and award-winning screen performance of the flat panel line.  Compaq pioneered <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $618.48

Web
      Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com

       Toll Free: 800-336-1166     Fax:
330-494-5260     email: sales@provantage.com

        Privacy
        Policy | Terms &
        Conditions | FREE
        Catalog

©2001
        PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720

    Products,
        prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time. Company
        and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered trademarks
        of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be copyrighted
        by the product's manufacturer.

        The
        Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of
        PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in
        the past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout
        process. Or, customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email
        List" box on the PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any time by going
        to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm.
        The email address is permanently removed from additional promotional
        electronic mailings, and will not be reactivated unless requested by the
        customer.


To register your Palm Computingc organizer electronically, you must have an
Internet connection or a modem connected to your computer.

Or if you prefer, you can fill out and send the mail-in registration card
included in your Palm Computing package.

Special rewards only for registered users:

-FREE software programs *
-FREE technical support **
-Upgrade information
-Important updates

* For a complete list of free software, go to www.palm.com/eregdownload
** Subject to change without notice


Thanks for reminding us of their policy regarding erroneous trades.  I copied
you on an email to their sales rep suggesting that this change.   While we
are likely to trade less actively (and more carefully) if we are dependent on
the other counterparty to break erroneous trades, we would still like to
begin using this site.

Therefore, please proceed with your plans to conclude legal discussions.

Thanks.

Mike

"Peters, Jason" <jasonpeters@akllp.com> on 11/22/2000 10:37:52 AM
To: <Mike.Fowler@enron.com>
cc: <sara.shackleton@enron.com>

Subject: RE: Trading Edge

I will be reaquainting myself with the Agreement today and Friday.
Please confirm with me that the traders are ok with Trading Edge's
clearly erroneous trade policy - that is that Trading Edge will notify
an advantaged party but will not cancel a trade unless the other side
agrees.

Thanks,

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike.Fowler@enron.com [mailto:Mike.Fowler@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 8:52 AM
To: Peters, Jason
Cc: Paul.Pizzolato@enron.com; Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
Subject: Trading Edge

Jason,

Are you moving forward with Trading Edge legal discussions ?

Thanks.

Mike
713-853-9990

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000
08:47 AM ---------------------------

Mike Fowler
11/17/2000 01:45 PM

To:   PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com
cc:   Paul Pizzolato/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:  Trading Edge

Jason,

Could you resume discussions with Trading Edge rather than continuing to
wait for resolution of the consequential damage issue, which has been
outstanding for two months ?

Thanks.

Mike
713-853-9990


My comments pertain to page 2 of the chart under section C.4
referring to increasing the cashout prices to 75% and 125%.  I recommend a
few changes.  First the chart makes a reference to increasing Tier II
cashout prices under the Content Column.  This should be changed to Tier I
cashout prices consistent with the OFO settlement.  Second, it may be
appropriate to provide some additional details on this issue in the Change
to Gas Accord column.  One option is something along the following lines:
"None.  This change is consistent with the Gas Accord provision which allows
PG&E to file to revise imbalance charges and cash-out options.  The current
Tier I cashout prices do not provide an economic disincentive for incurring
cash-out imbalances in all months as intended in the Gas Accord.  This can
serve as a factor contributing to pipeline OFOs.  The change to the Tier I
cash-out prices is consistent with the intent of the Gas Accord, and the
objective to reduce pipeline OFO's."

-----Original Message-----
From: Yoo, Salle [mailto:salleyoo@dwt.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 2:32 PM
To: 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Craig Chancellor'; 'Gerald Worster'; 'Grant
Kolling'; 'James Weil'; 'Jeff Dasovich'; 'John Leslie'; 'Marcel
Hawiger'; 'Mark Baldwin'; 'Mark Pocta'; 'Michael Rochman'; 'Raveen
Maan'; 'Rich Hall'; 'Ron Oechsler'; 'Tom Solberg'; 'Timothy J Hamilton';
'plg@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com'; 'mday@gmssr.com';
'jmct@gmssr.com'
Cc: How-Downing, Lindsey
Subject: FW: Comments on OFO Settlement

Enclosed is a copy of the proposed Comments of the Settlement Parties in
Support of the OFO Settlement.  ("Comments")  The Comments address the
specific issues raised by ALJ Biren at the last prehearing conference as
laid out below in our previous email.

I am also attaching a copy of the Declaration of Dan Thomas (addressing how
the Settlement is in the public interest) and the matrix developed by PG&E
that compares the terms of the OFO Settlement to those in the Gas Accord.

In order to expedite the process, PG&E has suggested that it, as a
representative of all settlement parties, be the sole signatory to the
Comments.  Therefore, please review the enclosed documents, provide any
revisions and an indication of your assent/dissent to having PG&E sign the
document on your behalf by end of business tomorrow (Thursday, November 18).
The deadline for filing the Comments in Monday, November 22.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Salle E. Yoo
Davis Wright Tremaine
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel. 415 276-6564; Fax 415 276-6599
salleyoo@dwt.com

 <<Comments_OFO.doc>>  <<dft-dec.doc>>  <<chart.doc>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yoo, Salle
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 11:16 AM
> To: 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Ben Ledene'; 'Craig Chancellor'; 'Grant Kolling';
> 'Jeff Dasovich'; 'John Leslie'; 'Marcel Hawiger'; 'Mark Pocta'; 'Michael
> Rochman'; 'Raveen Maan'; 'Ron Oechsler'; 'Tom Solberg'; 'Rich Hall'; 'Mark
> Baldwin'; 'Timothy J Hamilton'; 'pgg4@pge.com'
> Cc: 'Katie Elder'; How-Downing, Lindsey
> Subject: Comments on OFO Settlement
>
> CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION SUBJECT TO CPUC RULE 51
>
>
>  As you recall, at the prehearing conference, Judge Biren directed
> the OFO settlement parties to provide her with additional information
> regarding the OFO settlement.  Friday, Nov.12, Patrick Golden and I had a
> follow-up conversation with Judge Biren to confirm the procedure by which
> she desires to receive the information.
>
>  As a result of the call, Patrick and I suggest that the OFO
> settlement parties file joint "Comments Supporting Settlement" on Nov 22,
> along with any other party which may file comments on the settlement.  Our
> comments would encompass the following:
>
> 1) The settlement is in the public interest as attested by an attached
> declaration.
>
> 2) The settlement does not constitute a change in the basic Gas Accord
> settlement; it merely refines implementation details on the Gas Accord.
> As a result, no hearings are necessary on the settlement.
>
> 3) Neither SB1602 nor 1421 impact immediate Commission approval of the
> settlement.
>
> 4) The settlement is intended to be a final, not an interim, settlement.
>
>  With respect to Judge Biren's request for declarations (which she
> reconfirmed despite agreeing that Rule 51 does not require declarations),
> Patrick and I discussed having the settling parties provide one
> declaration from PG&E outlining the reasons why the settlement is in the
> public interest, and having the PG&E declarant be authorized to state that
> the following parties authorize him to state that they support his
> declaration.
>
>  Judge Biren confirmed that any replies to our comments would be due
> along with all other reply comments on the settlement.
>
>  If you have any comments or suggestions on this approach, please let
> either Salle Yoo or me know ASAP.
>
>
> Lindsey How-Downing
> Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
> One Embarcadero, Suite 600
> San Francisco, California 94111
> Phone 415-276-6512
> Fax     415-276-6599
> Email  lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com

 - att1.htm


talking with bryan right now.  done before weekend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Werner, Joy
Sent:	Friday, June 22, 2001 11:15 AM
To:	Forney, John M.
Cc:	Allen, Thresa A.; Ratnala, Melissa K.
Subject:	FW: May 2001 Checkout

John,
Where are we with this?
Please let me know.
Joy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 6:20 PM
To:	Werner, Joy
Subject:	RE: May 2001 Checkout

Okay,  so we now have a procedure.   I will broadcast to the group and see that it is implemented.   I still havent completed all of their discrepancy checkout.
I have been working nights through the weekend and tonite.    I will address these on Tuesday.
Clint will be helping me to resolve these and future issues.

Thanks,
JMF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Werner, Joy
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 5:29 PM
To:	Forney, John M.
Cc:	Allen, Thresa A.; Ratnala, Melissa K.; Jacobson, Michael
Subject:	FW: May 2001 Checkout

HI John,
Any word on this?
Please let me know.
Thank you
Joy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Amie Jackson" <ajackson@btutilities.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Amie+20Jackson+22+20+3Cajackson+40btutilities+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 3:25 PM
To:	Werner, Joy
Subject:	RE: May 2001 Checkout

Joy,

We spoke with John at your office about a proposed idea where EPMI and
COB book both sides of the parking agreements and then any power COB
keeps is sold to COB  at a price plus $4 to zero out the parking.  This
is acceptable for us, and I have tried to get in touch with John several
times so that he can instruct whoever to make the changes in your system
and to confirm that this is ok so we can change our system.  However, I
am not getting any response.  Do you know if any changes have been made
to your numbers?  If you could get with him and give me a call, we could
try to close out May!  Thanks.

Amie Jackson
Settlement Operations Analyst
Bryan Texas Utilities - QSE
630 Atkins St.
Bryan, TX  77801
phone:	(979) 821-5790
fax:	(979) 821-5864
e-mail:	AJackson@btutilities.com