Thanks for the info.  Please stay closely linked with the RTO Week activities to try and read Wood's questions.

Also, John Meyer from Reliant is testifying.  What will be his position?  Should we talk with him this week to coordinate and try and move him the right way?  Wasn't he the head of Congestion Management in ERCOT originally?  I think this is Wood trying to ask him how ERCOT works.  What will he say?

Thanks,

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Twiggs, Thane
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard
Cc: Robertson, Linda; Ryall, Jean
Subject: RE: FERC Looking at ERCOT

Here are a couple of clarifying points:

The congestion charges that have been incurred are 55.6 million or 137 million depending on the methodology used to calculate the charge.  If you look purely at the scheduled MWs then it is 137 MM based upong the ERCOT protocols.  The actual cost to redispach and clear congestion as of Sept. 22, 2001 was 55.6 MM.  Both obviously are very high considering it is for one month of operation.
When the 20 MM trigger was hit August 14, 2001, ERCOT has 6 month by Protocol and reaffirmed in the commission order to implement the full zonal model.  This means that there will no longer be an uplift of interzonal congestion, rather a direct assignment of the charge.  The charge may be partially offset by the TCR that will be auctioned.  The PUCT has indicated an interest to move to direct assignment prior to the development and implementation of a TCR instrument as a hedge.  I am chairing the congestion management working group that is deciding the TCR issue and will be dealing with the local congestion issues when that trigger has been hit.
It would be difficult to know if Pat Wood will try to push the ERCOT congestion management model as the model of choice.  The staff and Brett Pearman have been in favor of a movement to an LMP model as a fall back position initially, but have been more concerned with retail acess as of late rather than the ERCOT congestion.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Sun 10/7/2001 12:53 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Twiggs, Thane
Cc: Robertson, Linda
Subject: RE: FERC Looking at ERCOT

Thane --

Based on Wood's statements while at the PUCT, what issues will most likely drive his choice of a congestion management model?  My understanding is that Shumel Oren is on the panel at FERC, has he said anything recently that would argue that ERCOT may not be effective?

Finally, what are the minor changes to the ERCOT protocols to overcome the current obstacles so that if adopted we could use across the country?

Jim

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Fri 10/5/2001 12:22 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Twiggs, Thane
Cc: Robertson, Linda
Subject: RE: FERC Looking at ERCOT

Pat Profeta of Northridge Assoc. (Entergy's congestion management consultants) told me this too and said that Michael Schnitzer of Northridge has been asked to be on the congestion management panel for RTO week.  Michael is a strong advocate of the "SPP cornerstones" that are largely the basis of the "LMP/financial congestion hedge" model (initial model!) advocated in the SE RTO mediation report.  They are going to contact Thane to get more information about ERCOT -- they recognize that ERCOT has some problems.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Steffes, James D.
Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 10:38 AM
To:     Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard
Cc:     Nicolay, Christi L.; Robertson, Linda
Subject:        RE: FERC Looking at ERCOT

Agreed.  In fact, my understanding is that the ERCOT protocols state that if congestion is greater than $20 MM / year the model would change.  The market has reached $100 MM.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Novosel, Sarah
Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 10:27 AM
To:     Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Cc:     Nicolay, Christi L.; Robertson, Linda
Subject:        FERC Looking at ERCOT

This is just a rumor we're hearing, but we heard that FERC wants someone who knows ERCOT congestion management on the congestion management panel for RTO Week  because FERC (presumably Pat Wood) wants to use the ERCOT congestion management system as the standard CMS throughout the country.  From what I know about ERCOT (which isn't much and I have a call in to Thane to get an update), this wouldn't be a good thing for us.  We'll keep you posted.


Below is data that we have received recently.

Physical positions by month for 2002 - 2004 and by year for 2005 and beyond.

Financial positions by month for 2002 - 2004 and by year for 2005 and beyond.

Financial and physical positions by month for 2002 and miscellaneous aggregation of positions thereafter.

EES data by month for 2002, by year for 2003 and aggregated thereafter.

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GCOUCH>
To: Garza, Maria </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mgarza1>, Dicarlo, Louis </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ldicarlo>, McMichael Jr., Ed </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Emcmich>
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:46:40 GMT
Subject:

Same details as prior e-mail.  These are for physical positions.

Let me know if you have questions.

Greg

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GCOUCH>
To: Garza, Maria </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mgarza1>, Dicarlo, Louis </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ldicarlo>, McMichael Jr., Ed </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Emcmich>
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:25:35 GMT
Subject:

Here are the files containing in-the-money live position data.  There are 4 files : 2002 monthly, 2003 monthly, 2004 monthly and 2005 out yearly.  The summary information is on the "Financial Book Positions" tab.

I did not consolidate them into one report just in case you needed to look at the supporting information.

The physical files should be ready within the next few minutes.

Let me know if you have questions.

Greg

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GCOUCH>
To: McMichael Jr., Ed </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Emcmich>, Dicarlo, Louis </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ldicarlo>, Garza, Maria </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mgarza1>
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44:56 GMT
Subject:


Paul,

Please replace both references to "the Southern District of Texas"  with "the
District of Columbia" in the arbitration provision.  Please let me know if
this does not work for you.

Stacy


Energy Committee:

Here are the minutes from last week's EC meeting, along with Mukesh's 'High
Reliability Option under RTP tariff filing with CPUC' memo, the 'proposed
outline for the SVMG / NRDC joint report', and the 'return on investment for
Dr. Barbara Barkovich'.

 - NRDC-SVMG Rpt Outline for EC.doc
 - Energy Committee Meeting Minutes 7.11.doc
 - Memo to pge 071101.doc
 - return on investment for Dr Barkovich 1st half of 2001.doc
 - return on investment for Dr Barkovich 1st half of 2001.doc


rhoefer@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO will be posting invoices for November, 2000 to each Customer's
website, as of 1700 December 08.

Funds due the NYISO are to be transferred into the NYISO Clearing Account by
close of business Monday, December 18, 2000.   Funds due Market Participants
from the NYISO will be transferred to Market Participant accounts on
Wednesday,
December 20, 2000.  A letter containing transfer and NYISO Clearing Account
information will be issued later today.

Please be aware that as per the ISO Services Tariff any disputed amounts are
to
be paid in full.  Upon resolution of the dispute, if it is determined that an
overpayment has been made by the Customer, a refund, with interest, will be
made
by the ISO.


I would like to talk to you about the Rockies, and just how you see it progressing.  I need to do some workload mitigation stuff, and wanted to pick your brain this afternoon if I can.

I am starting Susie taking care of Midway as of tomorrow, and am thinking about moving the Mead responsiblities to the COB scheduler because COB is so small.


Sarah Beacom
19932 Buhrstone Dr
Gaithersburg, MD 20886
sbeacom@mcsheaco.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Sarah Beacom


-----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Miller, Jeffrey
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Miller, Jeffrey; Curry, Mike; Baughman, Edward D.; May, Tom; Day, Smith L.; Grace, Rebecca M.
Subject:	ANP Meeting - Potential QSE Client
When:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:00 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	EB 3125B

Update--Fletch & Debra have kindly moved their meetings to allow us to have 3125B for the afternoon.


Tom,

Here are the fault paretos of fault counts for all sites for May 2002
(may2002paretos_faults.pdf). For readability only the top 30 faults for each
site are displayed. Both Texas sites had VERY high numbers of "wind
deviation" faults.

I am also attaching a file (from a different work request) that has a pareto
(by site) of the mean number of faults per turbine (may2002mean_faults.pdf),
which shows that the Texas sites have the highest mean faults per turbine.
This also has boxplots of the number of faults by site to show the outliers.

I will do the June data, if still desired, when the data upload is completed.

As always, if you have questions or comments let me know.

Mark


Mr. Skilling,

Rev. Lawson would like to thank you for extending to him the invitation to
participate in the 2001 Big Cats Gala on June 14, 2001 at the Bronx Zoo in
New York.  Unfortunately, he will not be able to attend the event, and the
Wheeler Avenue budget for this year is not such that we can comfortably make
a contribution.  He would like to convey to Mr. Lay, however, that he
rejoices with this esteemed honor and will continue to keep his friend in
his prayers.

Thank you,

Roxanne Lawson-Troup
Administrative Assistant to Pastor


I received this email some time ago, and may not have forward it to you.  I
apologize for any oversight on my part.  I'll also forward the email that I
sent as a response.

This, coupled with the information from Sally Gould, should get the Comp.
Fin. interview process started.

-Kevin K.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000
04:44 PM ---------------------------

jean eisel <je2n@andrew.cmu.edu> on 11/06/2000 03:34:05 PM
To: Kevin.Kindall@enron.com
cc: sgould@andrew.cmu.edu

Subject: Re: Recruiting

Hi Kevin

Wow you sure do pack one e-mail.
I will try to answer questions...after each of you...look in the email
for answers.

--On Monday, November 06, 2000, 2:39 PM -0600 Kevin.Kindall@enron.com wrote:

>      Hello.  It was a pleasure to come back to CMU, and I enjoyed
> interacting with the students.  Vince K. has expressed interest in
> interviewing the Computational Finance students.  Enron will conduct first
> round interviews with the MBA students in December, and would like to set
> up seperate interviews for the Comp. Fin. students.  Enron would like to
> interview all the Pittsburgh based Comp. Fin students, and we need to
> select a date and a time.

We are excited that you want to interview the Comp finance students.

Do you want to do it in Dec. or before?  Let me know what best suits you.
Since there are only 16 individuals in the Pittsburgh area... we should be
able to accomodate you...Would you want one or two schedules..?

  What is the formal protocol in such matters?
>
All you need to do is let me know some ideal dates...and you send a job
description and names of the students you want to interview.

We will try to be as accomodating as possible.

>      Enron is also interested in the ECommerce students as we have
> ecommerce initiatives underway.   It is my understanding that Kristen
> Gandy will be the contact for such activities.

If you can send me an e-mail address for Kristen, I can get this strating
asap.
>
>      Regarding a Houston based satellite program, Vince needs a proposal
>      in writing.  Would you be so kind as to send one?

What program is Vince interested in having a satellite program?  When he was
here he seemed less intererted in Comp finance and more interested in
E-commerce.

I sent a note to Michael Shamos and Tridas discussing this.

Let me know which program and I will see if we can work anything out?

>      Thanks so much, and I look forward to seeing you again in a few
>      weeks.
>

Thanks Kevin for you speedy response.

>
>
>
>

Jean E. Eisel, Ph.D.
Associate Dean, Admissions, COC and Alumni Relations
GSIA
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-2277
412-268-4146 (fax)
******************************************************************
Currently in the news:  Carnegie Mellon University MBA program ranked 14th
in Business Week's list of the best graduate schools of business in the
United States.
******************************************************************


A message from my crazy sister!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2000
09:47 AM ---------------------------

"CAVALIER,D. MD" <LAB-DSC@womans.com> on 04/24/2000 07:51:33 AM
To: "'Sara Shackleton'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Perfect World!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SMITH,DEBORAH OGDEN
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 10:00 AM
> To: DIETRICH,KATHLEEN A; OGDEN,B.W. MD; CAVALIER,D. MD
> Subject: FW: Perfect World!
>
>
>
> Debbie Ogden, RN, CNOR
> Nurse Manager  - Surgery
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OLDENDORF,CHERYL O
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 8:56 AM
> To: ROBICHAUX,DENISE L; HOOD,LAURIE D; SMITH,DEBORAH OGDEN;
> JARREAU,STEFANNIE A; CAVALIER,KIM B; CREDEUR,SANDRA H
> Subject: FW: Perfect World!
>
>
> Subject: FW: Perfect World!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  <<garfield.pps>>

 - garfield.pps


Suzanne, give them Priscilla's number or my number.  Priscilla is at 713-345-3736 and my number is 713-853-4743.

thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Hamic, Priscilla
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:09 PM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Elvis Energy

Unify shows some production in November and December on CNG Appalachia.  Small producer.  We owe $539.35 for November and $338.40 for December.  Unless there is value we are not paying December production and of course we are not paying November.  The points on CNG are #4281001 and $4371101.  Let me know what I can do - maybe give the customer my number to call.

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:56 AM
To: Hamic, Priscilla
Subject: RE: Elvis Energy

Do you see any payables to Elvis Energy?

-----Original Message-----
From: Adams, Suzanne
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:28 PM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: FW: Elvis Energy

Chris, a woman from Elvis Energy is calling about some unpaid invoices, but I don't know anything about this project.  Kay Mann suggested that I contact you for possible help.


There is a lot of confidential information here (in items 1and 2)

Detailed monthly P&L covering all trading activity for the last three years

Potential Exposure by sector (eg gas and electricity utility)

Detailed monthly P&L covering all trading activity for the last three years.


Check out the poll at this URL regarding how folks feel about rate increases.

Best,
Jeff

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/21/M
N114450.DTL


Shapiro is just unwilling to accept the fact that his guy is a very scary guy
... enough to scare away lifelong democrats.

I got your voicemail.  Thanks for following up. We would be looking for a
contract relationship only, not full time.

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 08:39 AM -----

	Richard Shapiro
	11/30/2000 09:37 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: FW: We have a leak

???
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
09:37 AM ---------------------------

"Foster, Gary" <GFoster@Antigenics.com> on 11/30/2000 09:11:46 AM
To: "'Richard.Shapiro@enron.com'" <Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: FW: We have a leak

I believe that Steve has been won over only for political (as in corporate
politics) reasons but once he gets in the voting booth, he's still with you
and Melissa.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.Shapiro@enron.com [mailto:Richard.Shapiro@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 9:18 AM
To: Foster, Gary
Cc: Rick and Amy Shapiro (E-mail); Steve and Melissa Kean (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: We have a leak

Thanks- you got it about right .....except that Kean's Democratic
credentials are seriously in question these days as are his " liberal-
minded" credentials. You may have won over an individual  who can now
clearly  be categorized as a lost soul.

"Foster, Gary" <GFoster@Antigenics.com> on 11/30/2000 08:07:18 AM

To:   "Rick and Amy Shapiro (E-mail)" <rshapiro@enron.com>, "Steve and
      Melissa Kean (E-mail)" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  FW: We have a leak

steve and rick-
mark halperin is the political director at abc -- the smart guy sitting to
peter jennings's right all night on election night who knew everything. his
brother is a speechwriter at the nsc. you'll see below his recommendation
of
mark katz and his number.

i also emailed peggy noonan to ask for any ideas. haven't heard from her
yet. she's been very busy writing some of the more brilliant commentary on
the current situation which i'm sure hasn't been allowed into the shapiro
empire.

speaking of stock prices, what the hell happened yesterday? i'm still a
stock holder (very small) so pass my bitches along to koenig.

-----Original Message-----
From: Foster, Gary
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 8:42 AM
To: 'Halperin, Mark'
Subject: RE: We have a leak

what do you mean 'on principle'? there couldn't be a better issue for a
clinonista to stand for than busting up monopolies' hold on the little
people. actually enron's government affairs office is run by a bunch of
democrats and they just hired summer's  congressional person at treasury to
run their d.c. office. is your brother still at the nsc?

katz is the person i was thinking of. i'll pass his name along. thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Halperin, Mark [mailto:Mark.Halperin@abc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 4:22 PM
To: 'Foster, Gary'
Subject: RE: We have a leak

after re-reading your original email (the first words of which were that i
should share it with sam and gma) i felt a little less bad on my own....it
was still dumb...and our secret is safe..keep sending them

by brother is very funny...i'm not sure he would do it on principle...but i
can ask...the person to ask is mark katz...who wrote for clinton and
gore...very funny..very automatic...use my name...let me know if there is a
problem  212-496-7013
-----Original Message-----
From: Foster, Gary [mailto:GFoster@Antigenics.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:30 AM
To: Halperin, Mark
Subject: RE: We have a leak

your level of apologizing was not necessary but after re-reading my initial
email i can see where you could be mistaken that i was upset. i'm not. i
just don't want to break one of the only flows of insider information that
i
have left -- even if it's into a has-been.

but while i have you gravelling, you could do something for me. i just got
a
call from my old boss at enron and he is looking to hire someone as a
consultant who specializes in humor writing. they want to try a humorous
approach in taking on the monopoly utilities in the battle over electricity
deregulation. do you know anyone in the clinton administration who has been
responsible for some of the president's humorous speeches? or anyone that
fits this bill? what about your brother? it seems like i read a profile of
one of them recently who was leaving. the only republican i can think of is
landon parvin who has been around forever.

-----Original Message-----
From: Halperin, Mark [mailto:Mark.Halperin@abc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 8:49 AM
To: 'Foster, Gary'
Subject: RE: We have a leak

two people here did stupid things (first me, by in a hurry giving
instructions to my colleague about what to do with the information;then my
colleague for sending it to somebody untrustworthy)

so: i apologize...being in a hurry is no excuse for being careless.....

here's the silver linings:

1. gma seems to have gotten it some other way later in the day, so from
there point of view, they aren't focused on where it came from
2. there is literally no one at abc who knows i know you
3. i give you my word that i will never be at all careless with anything
from you again, and won't let even one person have access to
emails/information from you...the person in this case doesn't know it came
from you (or jb for that matter, since i had already taken her name and
your
name off of it)

again, i'm sorry.....i have zero tolerance for such carelessness, and
pleading being overwhelmed with work on the story is no excuse

ps: i hope you saw jamie's interview...it was priceless

-----Original Message-----
From: Foster, Gary [mailto:GFoster@Antigenics.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 8:37 AM
To: Halperin, Mark
Subject: FW: We have a leak

when i said 'pass along', i only meant the information, not the entire
email. i'm not going to fess up if you and everyone else who has it doesn't
reveal their source.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean Becker [mailto:jebeck@flfw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 7:33 PM
Subject: We have a leak

Everyone at ABC has a copy of the last e-mail I sent everyone concerning
President Bush's appearances on the morning shows tomorrow.

We have a leak.

I suspect someone in total innocence is forwarding my e-mails to friends
and
family, etc.  I need for all of you to take a very careful look at your
forwarding lists and think about where this leak might be.  If you think
you
know where the leak is, please, please let me know.

If we can't find it, these e-mails will cease and desist.

Jean

P.S. In case you were wondering, yeah, ABC is not happy.


Dear John,

It's time to stock up on great titles from movies you love at a price
you'll adore! You'll find terrific prices on many of your favorite DVD
titles for as low as $9.49 right now at buy.com! From DVD Gift Sets
and Hot Pre-Orders to New Releases Under $20 and DVDs Under $11,
we have it all!

DVD Gift Sets
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANc0As

The Sopranos - The Complete Second Season
Click here for our low price:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANd0At

The Best of Friends, Vol 3&4
Click here for our low price:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANe0Au

Dirty Harry Collection
buy.com price: $65.49!
For more info about this DVD set, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANf0Av

Sex & the City - The Complete Second Season
buy.com price: $36.99!
Click here to find out more about this release:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANg0Aw

New Releases Under $20
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu065h0AH

Swordfish
Click here for our super low price:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANh0Ax

Empire of the Sun
Click here for our low price:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANi0Ay

Cats & Dogs
buy.com price: $19.99!
Click here for more info about this release:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANj0Az

Osmosis Jones
Click here for our amazingly low price:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANk0A1

Hot Pre-Orders
(order today!)

Rush Hour 2
buy.com price: $19.99!
Learn more about this DVD by clicking here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANl0A2

American Outlaws
buy.com price: $19.49!
Click here to find out more about this release:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANn0A4

Hedwig and the Angry Itch
For more info about this title, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANo0A5

Summer Catch
buy.com price: $14.99!
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANr0A8

DVDs Under $15
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0FWM0Ae

The Matrix Revisited
buy.com price: $14.99!
For more details about this movie, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANu0AC

Boiler Room
buy.com price: $14.99!
For more information about this title, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANw0AE

Rush Hour
buy.com price: $14.49!
Click here for more details about this release:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BANy0AG

Austin Powers - The Spy Who Shagged Me
buy.com price: $12.49!
For more details about this movie, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BAN20A4

DVDs Under $11
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BAN40A6

Cannonball Run
buy.com price: $10.49!
For more info about this title, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BAN70AA

Excalibur
buy.com price: $9.49!
For more info about this release, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BAOA0AL

South Park: Christmas in South Park
buy.com price: $10.49!
Click here for more info about this title:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BAOB0AM

Above the Law
buy.com price: $10.49!
To read more about this movie, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0BAOD0AO

As always, we thank you for choosing buy.com.

Robert R. Price
President, buy.com

In addition to electronics, buy.com also offers top-of-the-line
computers, best-selling books, videos, software and much more. Check
out these stores:

Computers
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu04pB0Aa

Software
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0RVU0Ax

Electronics
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0FWL0Ad

Wireless
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0bIi0AM

Books
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0FWQ0Ai

Music
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0FWP0Ah

Games
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu04o40AL

Video
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0FWN0Af

DVD
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu04o10AI

Clearance
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu0bIc0AG

Anytime Help: Please use the link below for your Customer
Support questions. Please do not reply to the buy.com eMail
address. It is not an active mailbox. Click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu04pH0Ag

All prices and product availability subject to change without
notice. Unless noted, prices do not include shipping and
applicable sales taxes.  Product quantities limited.   List price
refers to manufacturer's suggested retail price and may be
different than actual selling prices in your area.  Please visit
us at buy.com or the links above for more information
including latest pricing, availability, and restrictions on each
offer. "buy.com" and "The Internet Superstore" ?are trademarks
of BUY.COM Inc. ? BUY.COM Inc. 2001.  All rights reserved.

We respect your privacy. If you would rather not receive eMail
alerting you of buy.com special offers, product announcements,
and other news, just let us know by clicking here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/profile?y=eEss0D4S5I0Blu4


My apologies for the late notice in requesting your performance review for
David Portz.  He was incorrectly listed in the system as an employee under my
supervision and I didn't see his suggested reviewer list until today.


FYI.  Presentation by Brattle Group before CA leg committee yesterday in
which they assert market power at the CA border (held by "out-of-state
suppliers") explains high gas prices in California.  If you have any
questions, call me at 415.782.7822.  Please forward to others whom you think
might be interested.  Stephanie, could you forward along to Barry?

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001 12:23 PM -----

	Douglas.Porter@sce.com
	04/19/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Per your request, attached are the presentation slides from yesterday.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com(See attached file: DRT2486.PPT)
 - DRT2486.PPT


I'm working on it now.  Maybe we (Enron) could review it tomorrow morning,
then send it to FCE.  I can meet around 10:00.  That way, we can get it to
them in time for weekend review.  Does that work?

Kay

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           10/26/2000 12:54 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FuelCells

I spoke briefly to Jeff.  He said that they resolved all the major economic
issues with FuelCells.  Here is what I believe to be the resolution.

1.  Foundations--FCE to do; our obligation to deliver site in the required
conditions.

2.  Shipping--As we previously proposed; not to exceed amount

3.  Escalation--None.

4.  Financing Adder--Considering 3.6% adder.

5.  Termination points--Jeff said 9 months, 5 months and 4 months.  I assume
that means 9 months after expected installation for the first 7 units, 5
months for the next 7 and 4 months for the last 8.

6.  Termination Price--Average price of order.

Where does everything stand on the redraft?


AMEREX WEST

Chris Mallory
I am missing the following deals:
1) Enron buys from Duke 25 mw of off-peak SP-15  for 3/2-3/31 at $150 with
fee of .0075
2) Enron sells  to Sempra 25 mw of off-peak SP-15 for 3/2-3/31 at $162 with
fee of .0075 (our deal 534490...has NP-15...Amerex says Sp-15)

PREBON WEST

Tom Alonso
I am missing the following deals:
1) Enron buys from Williams Bal of PV 25 mw at $230
2) Enron sells to Williams Bal of PV 25 mw at $229 (our deal 534494...has
buy.....Prebon says Sell)

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
04:35 PM ---------------------------

Evelyn Metoyer
02/28/2001 04:29 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 1/28 Checkout

AMEREX WEST

Chris Mallory
I am missing the following deals:
1) Enron buys from Duke 25 mw of off-peak SP-15  for 3/2-3/31 at $150 with
fee of .0075
2) Enron sells  to Sempra 25 mw of off-peak SP-15 for 3/2-3/31 at $162 with
fee of .0075

PREBON WEST

Tom Alonso
I am missing the following deals:
1) Enron buys from Williams Bal of PV 25 mw at $230
2) Enron sells to Williams Bal of PV 25 mw at $229

Matt Motley
I am missing the following deals:
1) Enron buys from Williams Q3 Mid-C 25 mw at $370

2) Deal 534382 Prebon shows location as SP-15 not NP-15

Tim Beldon
I am missing the following deals:
1) Enron sells to Constellation 25 mw of Q4 SP-15 at $165
2) Enron sells to Constellation 25 mw of Q4 SP-15 at $169

BLOOMBERG
All trades are good.

Thanks!!


Either the location, or the number of locations has changed on revision number 18. The hedge associated with this deal needs to be re-evaluated.


Please advise PG&E and Aquila that we will not address the questions below
until Phase 2.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Ron Coker/Corp/Enron on 09/26/2000 04:06 PM -----

	Benjamin Rogers@ECT
	09/26/2000 03:53 PM

		 To: Ron Coker/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Additional PG&E Question and an Aquila Question - all on Pastoria

---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
05:53 PM ---------------------------

"Iaconetti, Louis" <louis.iaconetti@csfb.com> on 09/26/2000 05:51:29 PM
To: "Don Miller (E-mail)" <Don.Miller@enron.com>, "'Benjamin Rogers'"
<Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com>
cc: "Bartlett, James" <james.bartlett@csfb.com>, "Al-Farisi, Omar"
<omar.al-farisi@csfb.com>, "Heckler, James" <james.heckler@csfb.com>, "Modi,
Rishi" <rishi.modi@csfb.com>
Subject: Additional PG&E Question and an Aquila Question - all on Pastoria

I spoke to Aquila again today.  They are planning to submit bids on Friday
for Gleason, Wheatland and Pastoria.  They already have a tolling agreement
in the Lincoln area and don't want more capacity there.

Aquila's question:

They questioned the development costs for Pastoria - look very high.  I
noted that it includes the ERC's.  They would like a breakout of the
development costs

PG&E's question is below.  Are you comfortable disclosing this at this stage
or is this a phase II due diligence item?

-----Original Message-----
From: Favinger, Thomas [mailto:thomas.favinger@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 5:17 PM
To: 'Iaconetti, Louis'
Subject: RE: Responses to PG&E Questions on Pastoria

Since we do not have to accept the NEPCO contract, can you break out the
cost and scope of equipment (Enron uses the term "power islands")?  Can we
get this information tomorrow?  Both cost and scope of this is important to
be able to assess the "EPC" price and determine bid price.


Sounds good to me!  Saturday, 8:00 am at Buffalo Grille it is!


sorry it is 598739

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:25 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

598736 and 598737 have been changed to off-peak hours. But I can't pull up
306927. Is this the right deal number?

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:03 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

Bob Badeer
deal 306927
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs

Bob Badeer
deal 598737
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs

Bob Badeer
deal 598736
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs


Muni's and other public entities (state, local and federal) are the type of
counterparties for which we require legal opinions and the whole ball of wax,
so to speak, including background documentation, resolutions, etc.  If we
cannot prove authority to transact, then the agreement may not be enforceable
(i.e., if the counterparty owes us money, we may not be able to collect).  We
definitely need to review certified copies of  the counterparty's charter,
enabling statutes or legislation creating or authorizing the counterparty,
its bylaws, charter or constituent docs, investment policies, guidelines or
restrictions, resolution approving the swap (or other) transactions and
authorizing a person(s) to transact,etc AND a legal opinion (the format of
which we always provide to the counterparty).    It's best to execute the
ISDA but we do have an omnibus drafted for municipalities.  Call if you need
further help.  Sara

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Patricia Cini                           11/16/99 03:13 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County

Sara:

2 power swaps were done on 11/10/99 with this entity that is a municipality.

Buying a swap.  30,800MW at a price of $20.00.  7/1/00-9/30/00.  Deal number
261960.2
Selling a swap.  30,800MW.  4/1/00-6/30/00.  Deal number 261960.3

I want to check this deal with you to see if this entity is allowed to enter
into financial swaps.
Please let me know if you need any further information.

Regards,

Pat


This is during our meeting with Michael Guerriero.  Would you prefer that I
cover the ISDA call?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Legal Temp 1                           12/02/99 03:18 PM

Sent by: Mark E Haedicke
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Regularly Scheduled Conference Call for US Regulatory Committee

Can you cover this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 12/02/99 03:17
PM ---------------------------

Barbara Hanlon <BHANLON@isda.org> on 12/02/99 10:55:40 AM
To: US REGULATORY COMMITTEE <USREGCOMM@isda.org>
cc:  (bcc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Regularly Scheduled Conference Call for US Regulatory Committee

Our next conference call will be held this Friday, December 3rd at 10:00
a.m. New York time.  If you wish to participate, please call 888-391-6741
and give passcode "ISDA ONE" and leader is Rick Grove.

Stacy Carey
Director of U.S. Regulatory Policy


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Bob,

I spoke to Jeff.  He said he would not pay anything. I am waiting for John to
be in a good mood to ask.  What is plan B?

Phillip


You might be interested in the attached articles.
---------------------- Forwarded by Carolyn Green/HOU/AZURIX on 02/09/2000
04:38 PM ---------------------------

Carolyn Green on 02/09/2000 01:24:24 PM
To: John Wodraska/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Primary Pits Money Against Local Appeal- LA Times 020700

For your amazement & amusement!
---------------------- Forwarded by Carolyn Green/HOU/AZURIX on 02/09/2000
01:24 PM ---------------------------

"Steven Lipman" <stevenlipman@earthlink.net> on 02/07/2000 11:02:06 AM

To:	"Pete Parsons" <pparsons@harc.edu>, "Jan McFarland"
<jmcfarland@worldnet.att.net>, Carolyn Green@AZURIX@ENRON, "Jill Halverson"
<jhalver333@aol.com>
cc:

Subject:	Primary Pits Money Against Local Appeal- LA Times 020700

Knowing of the growing interest around the country on the "Big Hat's" race in
the March 7 Democratic primary for the 41st California Assembly District,
Steven Lipman Consulting [a full-service, but not yet for profit company] is
committed to keeping you informed! Here's the link to an article in today's
LA Times. Enjoy!

 http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/natpol/20000207/t000012305.html

 - att1.htm
 - Primary Pits Money Against Local Appeal.url


Subject:	TETCO ASA and Global Settlement Filing Effective 12/1/01

November 8, 2001

To: S-2 Customers

Re: TETCO ASA and Global Settlement Filing Effective 12/1/01

On October 31, 2001 Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation
(TETCO) filed its annual Applicable Shrinkage Adjustment (ASA)
and its final Order No. 636 Transition Cost filing in Docket No.
RP02-36-0000.  Included in the filing were revised rates and ASA
percentages designed to retain in-kind the projected quantities
of gas required for the operation of TETCO's system, including
percentages under Rate Schedule X-28 which Transco utilizes to
render service under its Rate Schedule S-2.  The revised rates
and fuel percentages have a proposed effective date of December
1, 2001, and if accepted as proposed would result in the
following changes in Transco's Rate Schedule S-2 rates and fuel
percentages:

Injection Rate - $0.0020 decrease
Withdrawal Rate - $0.0048 decrease
Injection Fuel Percentage - 0.08% decrease
Inventory Level Fuel Percentage - 0.02% decrease
Withdrawal Fuel Percentages:
     Winter Period - 0.03% increase
     Spring, Summer and Fall Periods - 0.09% decrease

Please refer any questions to Mike Heeney, Rate Department, at
(713)215-2424.

Ann Taylor
713-215-2045
Customer Service


Kay:

Is this acceptable to you? Do you have any open issues that I missed.
I think it is fair.
----- Forwarded by Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/09/2001 08:36 AM
-----

	jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com
	03/09/2001 08:35 AM

		 To: bbarto@enron.com
		 cc: chasecl@pssch.ps.ge.com
		 Subject: Blue Dog Max, comments on draft CO No. 2, rev 6a

Brian,

We are in agreement with the language you proposed for Change Order #2 with
the following exception;

We suggest that the first sentence of the revision of 2.6 be retained but
that the balance of the provision be deleted and substituted with the
following:

> Purchaser and Seller agree that the Primary Warranty Period for Unit 1
> Equipment placed into storage shall be determined in accordance with
> Article 14.1.1 of the Agreement except that the Primary Warranty Period
> shall end no later than thirty-six (36) months from the date the last
> Major Component of Unit 1 is delivered to Seller's storage facility in
> undamaged condition.
>
We believe the above wording is a compromise to satisfy your concern that
Unit 1 could be damaged in transit to the storage facility.  The above
wording extends the warranty period, at no cost to Enron, at least by a
duration equal to the transit time to storage .

It is our hope that we can proceed from here.

Regards,

Jeff
Global Power Plant Systems
518-385-0663
518-381-1513 (fax)

>
>


Yes: I got through to him today and we are having lunch on Thursday 5 July:
he is positive but wants more information about the company and what we would
offer him. I said that at such an early stage and because he was having lunch
with me rather than someone more senior I could only talk to him about the
company and my impressions.  But it would be useful for me to have some sense
of what it is that we want him to do in the Frankfurt office. Frankfurt is a
big draw for him.

Brendan

Richard Shapiro
06/25/2001 04:48 AM
To: Brendan Devlin/EU/Enron
cc:

Subject: Re:

Any further word from Dominick?

Brendan Devlin
06/07/2001 09:31 AM
To: dominik.schnickels@cec.eu.int
cc:  (bcc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron)

Subject:

Dominik,

It was good to speak with you at the EEMF Forum; we all found your
presentation impressive and the responses to the questions finely tuned to
leave us thinking that we had been given priviledged access to information
when in fact we hadn't; what a pro!

As I said, my colleague Rick Shapiro (head of our global public affairs)  was
impressed and he was serious when he thought of you for our Frankfurt
office.  I am sure that if you showed interest, things could move quickly (or
even slowly, if that's what you wanted) and any particular circumstances that
you had would be taken into account.  I can certainly attest to the welcoming
nature of Enron.  have a think about it, and if you want to folow up, on a
completely informal and no commitment basis, let me know.  Even if you do not
want to leave, it's good to know what your market worth is!!

Lunch some time?

Brendam


Records indicate that there are a significant number of employees who have yet to have a drug test.

Here are the details of the locations in Houston, Portland and other locations.

Please attend one as soon as possible to avoid delays in your your onboarding and payroll processing.

HR


Hello Mike,

It has been a while since my last communication with you. I hope all is well.

I want you to know that I greatly appreciated you helping me get in touch
with Ken Rice and all of the other folks at EBS last year. We made great
strides and came very close to doing a deal between our organizations.
However, Comdisco recently has come under some financial duress and is most
likely going to be sold off in pieces.

I have been talking with some of the folks within EBS about the possibility
of an origination position with their group. However, I am of the opinion
that EBS is slightly ahead of the market, and therefore the timing may not be
right for me to consider an origination position with EBS.

With that being said, I would be very interested in exploring what
opportunities might exist within your Global Markets group from an
origination standpoint. As you know, I am professionally aggressive, mentally
tough and fearless of contacting potential clients. I have solid experience
in professional selling, possess excellent communication and entrepreneurial
skills.

Mike please consider the attached resume below. I would welcome the
opportunity to meet with you or the appropriate person within your
organization at any time.

Thanks again, and I hope to hear from you.

Richard Dukes

Richard T. Dukes
Account Sales Manager
Comdisco, Inc.
713 479-1808
rtdukes@comdisco.com

 - RTDComdisoRESUME.doc.rtf
 - Richard Dukes.vcf


Can I take a quick look at the BofA file?  Thanks. Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 04:35 PM -----

	Mary Cook
	11/30/2000 02:28 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bank of America/ERMS executed master blue file

I had pulled it for Angela re our jOshua tree deal.  Mary

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 02:28 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	11/30/2000 02:21 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bank of America/ERMS executed master blue file

Does anyone have this file?  The master was executed on 2/28/92.  Thanks.
Sara


Would you send  me your info regarding EXHIBIT A,  Invoices, Payments, and
nominations so I can complete this section.

Thanks!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Reply To:service@harryanddavid.com
From:service@harryanddavid.com
Subject:Your order from Harry and David (#0300216691)
??????????A
Sender:service@harryanddavid.com
To:carol.st.clair@enron.com,
cc:
bcc:ecomdiag@bco.com,
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Thank you for ordering from http://www.harryanddavid.com/, your
order has been received and is being processed.  If you need to get
in touch with us about your order, click here:
http://www.harryanddavid.com/orders.html and complete the form or
call us at 1-877-233-3000 anytime.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carol St. Clair
8926 Bent Spur Lane
Houston, TX 77064

e-mail: carol.st.clair@enron.com
Phone:

Item(s) subtotal:       $202.75
Shipping & Handling:     $36.49
Expedited Shipping:       $0.00
Tax:                      $7.96
                     ----------
                        $247.20
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recipient # 1

Carol St. Clair
8926 Bent Spur Lane
Houston, TX 77064

Qty  Item          Description                                  Each
2    7633Z         Thinking Of You Tower Of Treats             $24.95
   *The delivery method you selected was Standard Delivery
    to arrive by 12/04/00.

     Greeting:
         accept
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recipient # 2

Suzanne Caver
504-674-2235
20 Rue Reims
Mandeville, LA 70471

Qty  Item          Description                                  Each
1    4179J         Bear Creek Banquet                          $49.95
   *The delivery method you selected was Standard Delivery
    to arrive by 12/15/00.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recipient # 3

Lynne Smith
225-387-4014
1135 Westmoreland
Baton Rouge, LA 70806

Qty  Item          Description                                  Each
1    5000J         Favorites Basket                            $49.95
   *The delivery method you selected was Standard Delivery
    to arrive by 12/15/00.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recipient # 4

Mark Taylor
713-853-7340
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street 38th Floor
Houston, TX 77002

Qty  Item          Description                                  Each
1    7253Z         Chocolate-Lover's Tower                     $52.95
   *The delivery method you selected was Standard Delivery
    to arrive by 12/15/00.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks again for ordering from http://www.harryanddavid.com/


Thanks- You guys need a rest. Have a great holiday. Rick


THIS IS BEAUTIFUL!
----- Forwarded by Nytasha Sims/HOU/Dynegy on 01/30/02 10:53 AM -----

                      LaShawna Y
                      Atkinson                 To:       Andrea Y McCathy/HOU/Dynegy@Dynegy, Nytasha Sims/HOU/Dynegy@Dynegy
                                               cc:
                      01/30/02 10:35 AM        Subject:  Spiritual African-American Woman

----- Forwarded by LaShawna Y Atkinson/HOU/Dynegy on 01/30/02 10:33 AM
-----

                      Tammy Riley
                                               To:
                      01/30/02 10:11 AM        cc:       (bcc: LaShawna Y Atkinson/HOU/Dynegy)
                                               Subject:  Spiritual African-American Woman

-----Original Message-----

(See attached file: Spiritual_Woman.pps)

 - Spiritual_Woman.pps


OK, Here we go.  It looks  like ARM will take this on.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 07:16 AM -----

	"Counihan, Rick" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>
	11/29/2000 04:26 PM

		 To: "'ARM List Serve'" <Arm@phaser.com>, "'Douglass, Dan'"
<douglass@arterhadden.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: SCE's Motion to Sever The PX credit issue, 11-29-00, RAP (99)
A. 99-08-022

We should pour gasoline on this and light a match........

-----Original Message-----
From: Archer, Anthony V [mailto:ARCHERAV@sce.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 4:02 PM
To: 'kmccrea@sablaw.com'; 'defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil';
'rcsstl@cdmnet.com'; 'mbrubaker@consultbai.com';
'napedersen@jonesday.com'; 'athomas@newenergy.com';
'douglass@earthlink.net'; 'fchristi@arterhadden.com';
'lgurick@calpx.com'; 'foxba@sce.com'; 'shotwejp@sce.com';
'mshames@ucan.org'; 'jparrott@sempra.com';
'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'; 'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com';
'jur@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'bfinkelstein@turn.org'; 'jur@cpuc.ca.gov';
'dgrueneich@gralegal.com'; 'saw@jmbm.com'; 'jlkm@pge.com';
'phanschen@mofo.com'; 'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com';
'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com'; 'ssmyers@hooked.net';
'wbooth@booth-law.com'; 'mgomez1@bart.gov'; 'andrew.madden@utility.com';
'dmarcus@slip.net'; 'brbarkovich@earthlink.net'; 'berry@apx.com';
'bill@jbsenergy.com'; 'jweil@aglet.org'; 'abb@eslawfirm.com';
'dkk@eslawfirm.com'; 'jdh@eslawfirm.com'; 'pstohr@dbsr.com';
'rliebert@cfbf.com'; 'aorchar@smud.org'; 'mpa@aelaw.com';
'dws@keywaycorp.com'; 'fosterbc@sce.com'; 'rrh3@pge.com';
'aod@newsdata.com'; 'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'blaising@braunlegal.com';
'ccastagnoli@hesinet.com'; 'karen@klindh.com'; 'huse@eesconsulting.com';
'mer@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'adf@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'cmw@cpuc.ca.gov';
'cjb@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'jeh@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'kth@cpuc.ca.gov';
'meb@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'rab@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'Slayman@energy.state.ca.us'
Cc: Keeler, Robert B; 'Alice Archer'; Chadsey, Linda; Fox, Beth;
Monalisa, Dina
Subject: SCE's Motion to Sever The PX credit issue, 11-29-00, RAP (99)
A. 99-08-022

 <<PX Motion of SCE>>

Attached is SCE's Motion to Sever the PX Credit Issue From the Commission's
Decision, in A. 99-08-022

This document was filed and served today, 11-29-00, on all parties of record
in this proceeding.

Sincerely,

Anthony V. Archer
So. Cal. Edison's Legal  Dept.
Tele: 626 302-3104
Pax:: 2-3104
Fax:: 2-2304
Suite 315

 - RAP99_~1.PDF


Scott:  Could you forward a copy to me and Bill? Thanks.

Best,
Jeff

	William Gang@EES
	03/20/2001 05:34 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: [Fwd: Air Force Talking Paper of Direct Access]

Sounds like it ought to be shared, but I haven't seen the base document.  It
appears, however, that sharing the info is what the USAF is encouraging, from
reading between the lines.  Please send me the document.

Regards,
Bill

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/20/2001 04:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
cc: Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>, Jeff Dasovich
<jdasovic@enron.com>, Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, wgang@enron.com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Air Force Talking Paper of Direct Access]

I think we ought to "share it" with folks.  Bill Gang, do you have any
objections?

Jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	03/20/2001 04:52 PM

		 To: Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>,
Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>, Susan J Mara <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: [Fwd: Air Force Talking Paper of Direct Access]

We can use the Air Force DA document under the Freedom of Information
Act.  We could also distribute it to the Administration and Legislature
anonymously.   Please advise.

----- Message from Wells Bill LtCol HQ AFCESA/ULT <Bill.Wells@tyndall.af.mil>
on Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:18:12 -0600 -----
To:	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
Subject:	RE: Air Force Talking Paper of Direct Access
If you had filed a Freedom of Information Act request, I would have sent it
to you, so I treated your request as the functional equivalent of a FOIA
request.  That basically means that it is in the pubic domain.  While you
can not say you are distributing it on the behalf of the Air Force, you can
certainly share it with anyone you wish.

Bill C. Wells, Lt Col, USAF
Chief, Utility Litigation Team
DSN 523-6347; 850-283-6347

Note new e-mail address:
    bill.wells@tyndall.af.mil

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar [mailto:sgovenar@govadv.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:58 PM
To: Wells Bill LtCol HQ AFCESA/ULT
Cc: J. Mara Susan. (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Air Force Talking Paper of Direct Access

Bill,

Thank you for the terrific fact sheet.  Is this something you have
distributed or
would you like me to distribute it?  I would of course not submit it on
behalf of
the Air Force?

Wells Bill LtCol HQ AFCESA/ULT wrote:

> As requested
>
>  <<Direct Acccess TP(16 Mar 01).doc>>
>
> Bill C. Wells, Lt Col, USAF
> Chief, Utility Litigation Team
> DSN 523-6347; 850-283-6347
>
> Note new e-mail address:
>     bill.wells@tyndall.af.mil
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                        Name: Direct Acccess TP(16 Mar
01).doc
>    Direct Acccess TP(16 Mar 01).doc    Type: Download File
(application/msword)
>                                    Encoding: base64


FYI - Shell Meters for march 2001.

AL
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 09:47
AM ---------------------------

Mary Poorman@ENRON
02/22/2001 10:12 AM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: March Nominations at Shell Deer Park

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 10:12
AM ---------------------------

"Shankster JL (Luther)" <JLShankster@equiva.com> on 02/22/2001 10:07:34 AM
To: "'Lamphier, Gary'" <glamphi@enron.com>
cc: "Carter, John" <JCCarter@equiva.com>, "Ricks, Ruth"
<RARicks@equiva.com>, kyle.r.lilly@enron.com, mary.poorman@enron.com

Subject: March Nominations at Shell Deer Park

Gary,

March 2001 nominations for gas delivery to Shell Deer Park are as follows:

Firm Baseload - 75,000 MMBtu/d
Spot Swing supply - 0 (zero)

Delivery of the above contract quantities is expected to be as follows:

  HPL-HP   HPL-E   HPL-S
 Firm 15,000 MMBtu/d 25,000 MMBtu/d 35,000 MMBtu/d

Turnaround activity started in January is expected to be completed in the
second half of March.

Please let me know if you have any questions

J. Luther Shankster

Energy & Utilities Planning
> Phone: 713/277-9307
> Fax: 713/277-9941
> E-Mail: jlshankster@equiva.com
> Home Page: http://rsweb
>


i hate notre dame.  tim, i need to get down to your office today.


----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000 04:24 PM -----

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/02/2000 03:34 PM

		 To: Sandeep Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy Young@ECT,
John Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, paul.kraske@enron.com,
mark.evans@enron.com, Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Deborah Culver@EES
		 cc: Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicki Sharp@EES
		 Subject: New Security and Human Rights Policy - Legal Comments

Rob has asked me to collect legal department views on the attached statement
of principles regarding Security and Human Rights that Enron Corp is
considering endorsing. These have been worked out over the past several
months by a task force of the US and UK governments, along with
representatives of industry (including Enron) and NGOs (including Amesty and
Human Rights Watch) under the auspices of Secretary fo State Albright and
Foreign Secretary Cook.  As a result, we really don't  have the ability to
change the text, which is fixed.

As you know, Enron is very concerned about human rights issues because of
their intrinsic value and their community relations impacts.These guidelines
would be in addition to the Human Rights Policy Statement the Enron board
adopted last year, which really do not touch on security matters as such. I
have sent this to each of your since your business units are those that have
the most extensive operations in the developing countries in which these
issues are of primary concern.  (I am separately collecting comments/concerns
from within EES and EECC.)

The Enron effort on this guideline project has been lead by Lauren Goldblatt
of the Corp. PR group. Lauren has run the attached drafts past Mike Hicks and
Pete Vandergam at Corp. Security for their views of whether this can be
implemented by Enron.  We as the legal department have been asked to express
our view on are the following:

(a) Are there any show stoppers that would argue that Enron should not
publicly express its "endorsement" of these polices?
(b) If Enron were to express its endorsement of the policy statement, what if
any material problems do you think your business line might encounter in
implementing the policy?
(c) Do you see any unintended practical or legal consequences that might
arise from Enron publicly adopting or endorsing this as policy?

Please take an hour few hours to read through the materials, or have one of
your lawyers do so. You might need to consult with your operation personnel
for their practical views as well.   I would be grateful if you could express
any concerns you may see with the guidelines by November 7 (Wednesday) so
that I can coordinate comments and get the responses out.   (The deadline for
Enron and other companies to express their endorsement of the policy has been
extended from the November 8 deadline expressed in the attached to November
15. To allow time for Enron to deal with responses, we have been asked to get
our feed back to Lauren by November 8 (Thursday).)

You cane-mail your comments or phone them to  me at 713-646-6309. If I get
suffucient expressions of interest for a conference call by Monday, I will
set up a call in number for Wednesday morning US.

Thanks, I appreciate your views and comments.

----- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/02/2000 02:06
PM -----

	Vicki Sharp@EES
	10/26/2000 10:26 AM

		 To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Deborah
Culver, Sarah Gregory/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lauren Goldblatt/NY/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Security and Human Rights

John, Rob and I have talked and   Rob would like you to take the lead on
this.  Deborah, I need you to work  with  John S. to see how our
international EES business (Europe, Mexico, etc.) might be   affected by this
and whether we take this position.  I am sure Rob and JOhn will  have the
history and expert opinion as to how this should be handled, and my guess is,
this issue primarily affects EECC at this time.  Maybe one of the Apache
lawyers can take the lead for the traditional EES business.   Rob will be in
next week and then going out of town and I will pick up for him then.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 10/26/2000 09:56
AM ---------------------------

Lauren Goldblatt@ECT
10/25/2000 05:44 PM
To: Rob.Walls@enron.com, Vicki.Sharp@enron.com
cc: Kelly.Kimberly@enron.net
Subject: Security and Human Rights

Rob and Vicki:

Over the past few months we have participated in an initiative aimed at
developing a voluntary set of guidelines governing human rights and security
arrangements.   I would greatly appreciate your thoughts, review, and sign
off on the guidelines.

Should we agree to endorse the principles, we must send a letter to the U.S.
State Department by November 8, 2000.     I have attached a fact sheet as
well as the revised principles for your review.

The principles and signatories will be announced by Madeline Albright and
Secretary Robin Cook in November.

Thank you for time and consideration on this.  Please do not hesitate to call
with any questions.  I can be reached either by cell phone (917) 821-0724 or
by  voicemail at 212-702-3916.

Best Regards,

Lauren

 - corp_resp__20_Sept_[2].doc


Per my previous email.  NW doesn't have this change.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2001 11:36
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rebecca Walker                           04/24/2001 04:05 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Catherine
Clark/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: PLEASE REVIEW -- Changes to Northwestern Letter Agreement

Kay

Attached are changes to the Northwestern 7EA Letter Agreement.  Per Ben
Jacoby's request, I have updated the Remaining Purchase Amount Instalment
(Schedule III) Amounts.  Catherine Clark in Global Finance has signed off on
these numbers, as well.  Please call me at x57968 if you have any questions.

Regards,
Rebecca


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	DesMoines Team on SBA Tenaska - Lynn's office

Date:		10/26/2000
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Daren, can you help me with placing K's @ the below listed meters?  I don't
know if these deals should be rolled or if new ones were set up.

I'll need a K @ each specified meter for the month following the noted month
that had a K @ it.

Thanks in advance for your help.
-Jackie-
3-9497

98-1534 (Delivery) Last flowed w/ a K was 12/99 on 215K Sitara #95541(Stop
Date 12/99)
98-6563 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was11/99 on 203K Sitara #26511, then new
sitara #130913(which was killed) Evergreen was checked on         this one.
98-6614 (Receipt) Sitara #130917-this deal's stop date is 2/29/2000.  The
deal amount is for 1487 mmbtu's but the estimated vols. are "0".  Did not
want to change anything in Sitara without your knowledge.

98-9758 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 96026573 Sitara #133088(Stop
Date 12/99) Evergreen was checked on this one.
98-9651 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 96026573 Sitara #51491(Stop
Date 12/99) New Deal #136744 (Deal Killed)
98-9789 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 11/99 on 012-41500-02-203 Sitara
#108246 (Stop Date 11/99)
98-5789 (Receipt)  Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 96026573 Sitara #26569
(Stop Date 12/99)
98-6855 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 215K Sitara #94120 (Stop
Date 12/99)
98-6725 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a Kwas 12/99 on 215K Sitara #138332 (Stop
Date 12/99)
98-9676 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 215K Sitara #95912 (Stop
Date 12/99)
98-4548 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 96026573 Sitara #94147 (Stop
Date 12/99)


I got the package on the 2002 PBS special.  We are already doing a
significant PBS sponsorship in connection with a series based on Dan Yergin's
(author of The Prize) new book "The Commanding Heights".  We have looked at
numerous Public Broadcasting sponsorships in the past, but the ratings are so
low they tend to be a very inefficient means of reaching our target
audience.  We made an exception for yergin's series because it focusses on
the role of free markets and their relationship with governments over time.
I'll ask Margaret Allen to handle the decline.


The Reliability Rules Subcommittee of the New York State Reliability Council
("NYSRC") is posting this message to inform all interested parties of the
ability to participate, on a "listen-only" basis, in the NYSRC Reliability
Rules Subcommittee's Open Meeting No. 29 scheduled for Wednesday, October 3,
2001, starting at 10:00 A.M. The agenda which includes the meeting location
and dial-in number for this open meeting is attached.  Also attached are
directions to the Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. Erie Boulevard Office Complex.
The meeting will be conducted per the guidelines of NYSRC Openness Policy
No. 2-3
"http://www.nysrc.org/tcweb/pdf/Policy%202-3%20Final.pdf". It is requested
that those who plan on attending or listening send an email to
"larry.hochberg@nypa.gov" with the names of the individuals & organizations
participating.  Please visit "http:\\www.nysrc.org" for more NYSRC
information.

Lawrence T. Hochberg
Secretary, NYSRC Reliability Rules Subcommittee

 <<rrs_agenda29.doc>>  <<Driving Directions For NM.doc>>

 - rrs_agenda29.doc
 - Driving Directions For NM.doc


Sorry.  On point 4 below my preference is for the former not the latter.
i.e.  My preference is for Rob and Aleck to roll their presentation into the
Blakes presentation so that we have one presentation in each of Calgary and
Toronto, rather than two.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 09/07/2000 09:57
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           09/07/2000 09:32 AM

To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aleck
Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dan Dietrich/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mark
Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, dpef@blakes.com, dwm@blakes.com
Subject: Competition Law Seminar

Milly, as I mentioned to you, various developments in different markets have
led to a corporate wide initiative to initiate traders and originators into
competition law, market surveillance and market rule restrictions and
limitations on trading and origination activities.  Sullivan and Cromwell is
preparing the seminar in the US and Blakes is preparing the seminar for
Canada.  The purpose of this note is to advise of the seminar and to the
following:

1.  The seminar requires mandatory attendance of all traders and originators
in Calgary and Toronto.  I will prepare the notice, but I will want to rely
on you as necessary to ensure that everyone attends.

2.  We are planning the seminar for one of the first two weeks in October
from 4:00 to 6:00 on a designated afternoon at the Bankers' Hall Auditorium
in Calgary and at Blakes main boardroom in Toronto.  Dates are to be
confirmed.  I will likely attend at the Toronto seminar, but otherwise the
two seminars will be staffed by Blakes by a local partner in Calgary and
Toronto respectively.

3.  We would like to videotape the Calgary seminar and then somehow download
that to the intranet for mandatory review by new employees, and I will need
Dan's assistance for this.  I know Houston is working on this for the US
seminar and we can likely follow their procedure.

4.  With respect to market rules, the focus will have to be on Ontario
(power) and Alberta (power and if applicable gas).  It is attended that Aleck
(Ontario) and Rob (Alberta) would prepare and present these portions of the
seminar.  There are two alternatives:  Aleck and Rob could co-ordinate a
presentation into the Blakes presentation, or we could have separate seminars
on market rules.  My preference is for the latter as it will consolidate the
issues and be the best use of time, altough it may be too much fir one
seminar.  By copy to Mark I would appreciate your thoughts and you may want
to speak to Rick Shapiro to ensure that he is on side.

Peter.


Concur Expense (XMS) Goes Live 7/2/2001
                                                            Logon Instructions

1. Log into Microsoft Internet Explorer
2.   Type expensexms.enron.com in the address bar or click on the following
link:
<https://expensexms.enron.com>

Special Note: The XMS address above is a true internet address.  You can
access this address from home using your personal ISP (AOL, Earthlink, etc.)
You are no longer required to dial into Enron to access XMS.

3. Enter your +P, id in the Logon ID field.     Example. P00123456.
4.   Enter your birth date in the Password field in the following format:
YYYMMMDD where MMM is the three character month in
ALL CAPS.      Example: 1960JAN01
5. Click the Logon button
6.   You will be asked to enter a new password.  Enter your new password
using the rules below.

XMS Password Rules
1.  Passwords must be a minimum length of 8 characters long
2.  Passwords must be alphanumeric and contain at least one digit or symbol
such as   0-9, @, #, etc. and at least one non-digit or non-symbol

Additional Password Information
1.  Passwords cannot be reused once changed
2.  Passwords are set to expire every 90 days

If you have any questions or problems logging in, please call the ISC
Customer Care Center at 713-345-4727.


Good Afternoon,

Short-History
In case you haven't heard, our project to implement a high-bandwidth connection between Houston & Portland and remove our dependence on Terminal Server is a failure.  To make a long story short, the new DS3 allowed more data to travel back and forth but the time to get data between Houston and Portland was 10 times slower than running it through terminal server.

Plan B (Thin-Client)
So where do we go from here.  We are now starting a process to re-architect our trading applications so that they will run just as fast over our WAN as they do through terminal server.  We will be using an architecture that minimizes the traffic over the WAN, utilizes specialized servers to do most of the processing, and implementing more back-end power.  To help us in the effort, we need your help to identify which applications should be converted first.

Good Candidates for Conversion
Listed below are some attributes for applications well suited for the initial architecture conversion.
1.  Runs flaky in Terminal Server (Access Violation errors, application locks-up, etc)
2.  Applications primary source of data is located in Houston
3.  Mission Critical time constrained applications
4.  Mission Critical poor performing applications
5.  Heavily utilized applications

Feedback from you
Please reply back to the email or stop-by if you have any thoughts on which applications you think should be converted in the first-wave.

Poston's list
I've been hanging around for over a year and I think I have a pretty good idea of what might be some good applications for conversion.  Here's my first cut.
1.  Enpower Deal Scheduling
2.  Enpower Deal Entry
3.  Enpower Real Time Position Manager
4.  Enpower/FSP Schedule Blotter
5.  New Auto-Routing Application
6.  CARP report
7.  SAR report
8.  Forward obligations report

Thanks,  David Poston


Attached are pages 3 and 4 of NW Energy Coalition/Save Our Wild Salmon
(WP-02-E-NA/SA-04) Rebuttal testimony which was missing from some copies.  If
you would like a hard copy, I can fax it or mail it to you--just say the word.
Sorry about this!

Steve Weiss
503 393-8859

 - NWECrebuttalP3and4.doc


In order to better align our engineering and operations capabilities with the
commercial businesses they support, we are pleased to announce the following
organizational change will be effective immediately.  A new business unit,
Enron Engineering and Operational Services (EEOS), is being formed which will
include our existing operations in Enron Engineering and Construction Company
(EE&CC), Operational Energy Corporation (OEC), and National Energy Production
Corporation (NEPCO).

Brian Stanley, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and Keith Dodson, as
Chief Operating Officer will provide the leadership for this new
organization, reporting to the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale
Services.  NEPCO will continue to operate as a stand-alone business under
John Gillis, President.

With the majority of EE&CC and OEC,s activities focused on assets and
projects which are in Wholesale Services, this will better align the efforts
of EEOS with the commercial businesses it supports.  While EEOS will be a
stand-alone unit within Enron Wholesale Services it will work very closely
with and have direct accountability to the business units it supports.

This realignment also centralizes our engineering and operations capabilities
in a single business segment and should ensure that innovation and best
practices are shared and implemented across our many operations and will also
allow for better identification of priorities and more effective allocation
of resources to these projects.  Consistent with this approach, Development
Engineering will have dual reporting to both EEOS and the business units
which they support.

With an extensive and varied portfolio of assets around the world and a wide
variety of new development opportunities available to Enron, it is critical
that we continue to maintain the best in class capability to design,
construct, commission, and effectively manage and operate Enron,s assets on a
global basis.

This new global business unit should insure that we will continue to enhance
these demonstrated capabilities and provide us with a sustainable advantage
as we advance our business strategy around the world.

Please join us in congratulating Brian and Keith on their new assignments.

Mark Frevert & Dave Delainey


Because of unique aspects of their language and culture, the Japanese
generally find it far easier to deal with each other than with foreingers.
In some Japanese, this unease can lead to some unappealing attitudes and
behaviors.

The Japanese maintain a very clear distinction between an individual's public
and private faces, so that it is rare to catch them expressing hostile views
of foreigners.  Nevertheless, every now and then, a politician's remarks will
land him in trouble.

You might find the enclosed article interesting.  By the way, Ishihara spent
two weeks denying that he had done anything wrong and only apologized in the
past couple of days.

Regards,

Eugenio

      Ishihara acknowledges word was inappropriate

                Yomiuri Shimbun

                Tokyo Gov. Shintaro Ishihara late Wednesday acknowledged in a
statement
                that it was "inappropriate" for him to have used the word
"sangokujin" and
                said that he regrets having caused misunderstanding and
hurting foreigners in
                general by using the derogatory term in a recent speech.

                It was the first time that Ishihara had clearly admitted to
having hurt foreign
                residents by using the word, which has discriminatory
connotations.
                "Sangokujin" literally means "people from third countries."
Yet it was used
                after World War II as a derisory term for people from former
Japanese
                colonies, primarily Koreans, living in Japan.

                On April 9, he told members of the Ground Self-Defense Forces
in Tokyo
                at a ceremony, "Atrocious crimes have been committed
repeatedly by
                sangokujin and (other) foreigners who have illegally entered
Japan. It is to
                be expected that they will riot in the event of a major
disaster."

                Although he used the word to refer to those who have
illegally entered the
                country, it had a different meaning from what he meant to
say, he said.

                "I did not intend to hurt Korean or other foreign residents
in Japan, and I am
                extremely regretful," Ishihara said in the statement,
promising that he would
                never again use the "inappropriate word," which is prone to
cause
                misunderstanding.

                On April 14, he expressed regret over his remarks, but
stopped short of
                acknowledging the derogatory import of the word "sangokujin"
and failed to
                apologize for having hurt the feelings of foreigners.

                Wednesday's statement was made in response to demands from
                metropolitan assembly members of Minshuto (Democratic Party
of Japan)
                asking that he retract his remarks and make a public apology.

                Ishihara handed the statement to senior Minshuto members of
the assembly
                after they held a meeting earlier in the day.

                The statement, to which Ishihara will affix the governor's
official seal, will
                become an official document.

                Hidejiro Kawai, secretary general of the Minshuto group
within the
                assembly, said, "An official document carries weight, which
will be
                tantamount to the governor's withdrawal of his remarks and
apology,"
                indicating that the group will not take the matter further.


Spreadsheet has been updated and sent to Neil Bresnan, Daniel Kang, and
Jubran Whalan at EES. Thanks for your help on this.

Kate

Mark Confer
03/05/2001 09:03 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Brooklyn Couch/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: EES Spreadsheet Update

Kate, I am checking out EES February deals with Brocklyn Couch and problems
were noted on two deals 512775.1 on the 5th & 527967.1 on the 22nd.

EES was not agreeing to what we (Enron Power) has in Enpower.  Per Phil
Platter our numbers are correct and the worksheet needs to be updated to
reflect Enpower.

EES stated they will adjust their numbers once they get an updated sheet.
Thanks,

Mark


As per today's telephone conference, attached for your review is a draft Order
Form for the news component of the EnronOnline.com transaction.  The Order
Form
for the data component will follow later this evening.

(See attached file: Enron-Investor-NewsOrderForm 42000.doc)

Regards,

Stanford Lin
Senior Legal Counsel

-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
 - Enron-Investor-NewsOrderForm 42000.doc


Already in TW's Tariff

1.	Dollar valuing.  Need to terminate volumetric OBA's where possible to minimize TW's financial exposure.

Proposed in TW's 637 Filing - Keep

1.	Mandatory cash-out each month (after netting and option to trade).
2.	Definition of 6 indices (vs. 3 in current tariff).
3.	Parties may mutually agree to cash out PNR.  Could probably do today without this language.
4.	Clarification that PNR may be used by Operators.
5.	May use PNR for "auto-balancing".

Proposed in TW's 637 Filing - Could "Trade"

1.	Daily balancing.  Including daily tolerance, daily auto-transfer to PNR & daily pricing.
2.	Smaller tolerance range.  Proposed change from +/- 10% to +/- 5%.


What do you want for him - I am willing to talk something with M. Robinson in
it

Something like Westbrook and Taylor for Robinson and Garner?


Steve, I've attached our proposed plan.  Your comments are welcome.  We're
looking at costs so we can estimate a budget for this.

Mary


Let 'Em See Something In Writing

?????Hurricane Floyd was creeping its way up the coast to New York City when
the Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce held its last meeting
mid-September. Sensing impending travel catastrophes coupled with a mass
exodus down the shoreline to Washington after the session's adjournment, the
group appeased a eleventh-hour call from Utah Gov. Michael Leavitt, R, to
request proposals from the public on how to best deal with the prospect of
taxing e-commerce. And this week, after around 30 proposals were submitted to
the commission, a different kind of storm began to brew.
?????Consumer advocacy groups, local government organizations and
commission-watchers unleashed a flurry of press releases and media events to
announce their proposals, which were due to the commission on Nov. 15. Many
of the submissions, which were called to meet a set of 18 criteria ranging
from "meeting constitutional muster" to "radically simplifying the sales tax
system," responded to Leavitt's plan. Also due on that date were comments to
be considered for the report-drafting subcommittee's issues and options
paper, which will serve as a compilation of ideas on the topic of electronic
commerce and taxation for the entire commission to consider while it drafts
its final recommendation.
?????"What I think we're seeing is a tremendously positive development," said
Jim Lucier, a Prudential analyst who worked with Americans for Tax Reform's
Grover Norquist as he lobbied while the legislation creating the commission
was being drafted. "Instead of constantly squabbling, you have important
groups within the commission working hard to get majority positions."
?????Because infighting has plagued the commission from its beginning, a
majority may be the most difficult endeavor many of these groups have worked
for. The 19-member commission needs a two-thirds majority vote to approve any
recommendation, and the group already has shifted into pro- and anti-tax
factions, with only a few still undecided. The proposals are making their
rounds among the commission-members, and the next meeting is Dec. 14. While
there are a host of groups that have submitted their propositions it appears
that three are getting the majority of the commission's attention (and one,
specifically, because it was drafted by the group's chairman, Virginia Gov.
Jim Gilmore). Following is a synopses and analysis of the three plans that
have the best chance of succeeding:
	Title: Streamlined Sales Tax System for the 21st Century (Zero-Burden Plan)
Sponsor: National Governors' Association, National Conference of State
Legislatures, National Association of Counties, U.S. Conference of Mayors,
Council of State Governments, International City County Management
Association. While the remaining member of the "Big Seven" local
organizations, the National League of Cities, has backed the proposal's
intent, it is waiting until its annual meeting in December to vote on
supporting it officially.
Description: The idea centers around establishing a "trusted third party," or
tax clearinghouse, to collect and remit sales taxes based on the purchaser's
tax jurisdiction. When an online order is placed, the seller would notify the
clearinghouse and credit card company to determine the jurisdiction of the
buyer. The third party would notify the seller of the appropriate tax amount,
the credit card company would collect the funds and then remit the tax to the
clearinghouse. The clearinghouse would then distribute the funds to the
states and localities and would be paid by a percentage of what it collects.
The third parties would be licensed by the state and the necessary software
required of each vendor would be paid for by the state.
History: The plan was drafted after a series of marathon meetings by the
local organizations that argue they are jeopardized because of lost sales tax
revenues from e-commerce. Organizers of the proposal, which is being touted
by Gov. Leavitt, say that regardless of the commission's final decision they
will begin pushing the system to state legislatures for adoption. Under the
Internet Tax Freedom Act, no new taxes may be applied to e-commerce, but
existing taxes, such as sales and use taxes, are not covered. The sponsors
say they do not need the commission's go-ahead in order to implement the
system, which would be optional by state and would not require all 50 states'
involvement to function. Comments: The plan is widely criticized by anti-tax
advocates and those who believe that taxing e-commerce will stifle its
growth. Others say that the pro-tax movement is only supported by the
national government organizations and not their members, with Leavitt being
the notable exception, and criticize it for not receiving many other
individuals' support. But the organizations argue that unless states and
localities have the right to determine revenue-raising activities, control of
local services like education and law enforcement ultimately will be given to
the federal government. "Thomas Jefferson would roll over in his grave" if
that happens, Leavitt said.
	Title: E-Freedom Coalition Proposal
Sponsors: The E-Freedom Coalition's membership involves over 20
organizations, including Americans for Tax Reform, Citizens Against
Government Waste, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Consumer Alert, Heritage
Foundation, Progress and Freedom Foundation and State Policy Network.
Description: The group supports a ban on collection of sales taxes on
electronic commerce and the repeal of the 3 percent federal excise tax on
telecommunications. It also would ban discriminatory Internet taxation and
taxes on Internet access. The group endorses slashing local
telecommunications taxes and wants to see interstate telecom property taxes
reduced and controlled with federal protections. History: The E-Freedom
Coalition unveiled its proposal at a joint press conference with legislation
by House Budget Committee Chairman John Kasich, R-OH, that would ban Internet
sales taxes. Kasich's Internet Tax Elimination Act, H.R. 3252, would make
permanent the three-year moratorium on discriminatory Internet taxes passed
in the Internet Tax Freedom Act. Fellow Ohio Republican John Boehner joined
Kasich in sponsoring the measure. Comments: Americans for Tax Reform's
Norquist has led the anti-tax movement on the commission. Stan Sokul, an
independent consultant for the Association for Interactive Media was also on
hand to support the proposal. Advocates are promoting the plan by saying it
would protect consumers' privacy by not collecting personal information from
users to determine tax jurisdictions.
	Title: No Internet Tax
Sponsor: Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore, R, chairman of the Advisory Commission on
Electronic Commerce Description: Gilmore's proposal is almost identical in
ideology to the E-Freedom Coalition plan. He maintains Congress should ban
all sales and use taxes on e-commerce and protect businesses from state
income and business activity taxes simply because of their virtual presence
in a state. Gilmore also has proposed the elimination of the 3 percent
federal excise tax on telecommunications and has called for the federal
government to give states $1.7 billion each year for the lost revenue from
the repeal of sales taxes on e-commerce transactions. He also has proposed
that states be allowed to use federal welfare money to purchase computers and
Internet access for needy families.
History: Gilmore's outline was submitted to the policies and options paper
that the commission is preparing, not under the call for proposals suggested
by Leavitt. But because he is the chair of the commission and had maintained
that he would remain neutral, Gilmore's actions have received criticism from
many on the state and local side of the debate. But he has defended his
actions. "After hearing dozens of experts on an entire range of e-commerce
issues, I felt it was time to put forward my vision. It can be summarized in
three words: No Internet Tax," Gilmore said in a recent speech. Observers
have speculated that Gilmore's plan could be meshed with the E-Freedom
Coalition's to come up with a proposal agreeable to both parties. And
suggestions such as the welfare provision even have appeased pro-tax groups,
which have said solutions such as those may be the most agreeable for a
consensus statement. Comments: The National Association of Counties and other
local groups remain opposed to the plan's provisions calling for the federal
government to allot funds to localities. "The fact remains that Gilmore's
proposal means county officials will be even more dependent on state and
federal governments to fund their local services," said NACo's Executive
Director Larry Naake. "This isn't my idea of returning more control and
authority to the local citizen." *by Stephanie Lash


???????????????????????????????????????????? Rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 08:09 AM
---------------------------
From: Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/23/2001 07:11 AM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Harold Buchanan to Attend MIT Sloan School Executive MBA Program

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dalia, Minal
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:10 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael; Gorny, Vladimir; Hachen, James; Gorte, David; Ruane,
Mark; Bradford, William
Subject: Harold Buchanan to Attend MIT Sloan School Executive MBA Program

---------------------- Forwarded by Minal Dalia/HOU/EES on 02/22/2001 07:08
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services  From:  EES Office of Chairman
 02/22/2001 05:30 PM

Sent by: Carol Moffett
To: EES_Employees
cc:
Subject: Harold Buchanan to Attend MIT Sloan School Executive MBA Program

We are pleased to announce that Harold Buchanan will attend MIT Sloan School
Executive MBA Program.  Harold and his family will leave for Boston in
April.  In the meantime, he will work on special projects for EES and Marty
Sunde will be assume leadership of Harold's organization until a replacement
for Harold is found.

Please join us in congratulating Harold and in wishing him and his family the
very best of luck in New England.  We look forward to his return to Enron in
2002.


We will be releasing new version of the Stack Manager and the EnronOnline website tonight . The following are the changes

1. Changes to Stack Manager:

1.1 Changes to toolbar icons:
To facilitate further development of the system, it has been found necessary to change the toolbar icons at the top of the Stack  Manager. The attached file shows the old icon and its new replacement. Next to each image below is the description of the function that is executed as well as the short cut key that is mapped to the same function:

1.2 New Functionality - Auto Suspend
The Auto Suspend function allows traders to set an absolute price change from a price level at which you would like the system to automatically suspend a specific product. This function is useful if your products use automatic price resets.

To activate this feature:
1. Select a product and click on Product Properties
2. Check the Enable box
3. Enter the Price Check and Suspend at +/- values
4. Click Update
Example: a trader Enables Auto Suspend and selects a $35.00 Price Check and a suspension level of +/- $5.00: The system will suspend the product when the mid price is above  $40.00 or below $30.00

You will need to enter a new Price Check or disable the Auto Suspend function to reactivate this Product if the Auto Suspend is triggered.
Please note the system checks for any products that need to be suspended once a minute.

2. Changes to EnronOnline Website
 (These changes will be rolled out in phases over the next week and will be available to all customers only by Friday 5/4/01)

The following enhancements have been made to the EnronOnline Website:

2.1 Today's Transactions

Float Window:  In order to float the window, right click on the Today's Transactions section, click on the Float Window option.

Sort Ordering: Click on the column heading to change the sort order.

Linked Transactions: You can display the linked Transactions in an expanded or collapsed view. To do so, right click in the Transaction display area and select full Expand or Full Collapse.

2.2 Submission Box

The submission box has been modified in order to show a space between each set of "zeros" for the volume the customer wants to sell/buy.

Savita


This memo is on behalf of myself and Lynn Blair.

The following is an update on the status of our effort to resolve/clear past due receivable items currently sitting in the a/r aging report.

A/R-Imbalances, Transportation, Late Pay charges
The attached report reflects all of the remaining A/R items over 30 days related to imbalance, transportation and late pay charges including any unapplied cash.  Gas Logistics has worked very diligently to ensure the A/R is up to date.  Where there were problems, they recruited the help of Marketing and were very successful in bringing closure to some A/R issues.  The items to be included in the write off package (totaling ($3,486.75)) are designated as such and summed separately on the attached report.  Gas Logistics has provided explanations/resolution plans in the right hand column of the report.  To summarize the report, there is exposure of $1,534,792.  Of that, $1,563,897 is made up of four customer issues (Hutchinson Utilities, IES Industries, MidAmerican Energy and Utilicorp-CCI bankruptcy).  There are currently reserves set up for MidAmerican, $221,429 and Utilicorp, $98.496.

Beginning immediately Gas Logistics will include an aging report for all outstanding a/r as part of the customer accounts status package.  This package has been and will continue to be distributed to all  account managers monthly.

Gas Logistics has the initial responsibility to collect payments from shippers and will involve the account manager when an issue or collection problem occurs.  However the account manager will also have the responsibility to keep themselves informed as to the status of their shippers accounts.  The reports provided to them in the customer accounts status package will help them do so.

Work orders
Outstanding work order receivables are being researched and reconciled by Tim Bayles in John Cobb's organization and they plan to resolve these balances independent of the transportation-related effort.  Currently it is our understanding there is approximately $1.2m of outstanding work order receivables with $.6 reserved in December, 2001.  Mike McGowan has offered Laura Lantefield's assistance with getting these resolved.

OBA's
OBA's were not originally included as part of our a/r focus however Gas Logistics is already putting the same effort into resolving/clearing any OBA issues.  Currently OBA's over $200,000 are included in the customer accounts status package.  Gas Logistics is preparing a report similar to the a/r report for OBA's under $200,000.  This report will indicate which OBA's are reconciled and which ones need a resolution plan.

Please let Lynn or I know if you have any further questions.

Dana

Dana L. Jones
NNG Commercial Support
713-853-5787


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/17/01.   Please note that Nevada Power Company, Sierra Pacific Resources and Sierra Pacific Power Company were all placed on NO TRADES and Select Energy, Inc. was placed on Call Credit.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


Greg Whalley's four diamond level Astros tickets, plus parking pass, are
available for the games listed below.  Please advise me, asap,  if you have
an interest.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor x31935

COL  Wednesday, June 20 @ 7:05 p.m.
CIN  Thursday, June 21 @ 7:05 p.m.


Please review the attached filing and provide any comments you may have by COB Friday, 10/5.

The filing is ENA's comments on El Paso's proposal for receipt point allocation, focusing on discussions at the two technical conferences in the proceeding.  Also, it may be that, based on further discussion with certain other shippers, we will modify our statement in Item No. 1 to to support a different version of the method for allocating receipt point rights, but only if there is strong opposition to our method.  We don't want FERC to select the method that El Paso proposed originally.


It never ends.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000 03:35
PM ---------------------------

	Kathryn Cordes
	01/24/2000 03:30 PM

To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Aquilia

Bob:

This communication is to keep everyone informed of the back office issues
related to EOL trades with Aquilia

The Aquilia office (Aquilia Energy) in Omaha contacted our Settlements team
regarding the EOL day deals(invoices) stating that they were not Aquilia
Energy or Aquilia Risk Deals but rather Aquilia Southwest deals.  Aquilia
Southwest is not approved for EOL trading.  To ensure timely payment,
Settlements faxed all the invoices to the San Antonio office and have been
notified that payment for these invoices to Aquilia Energy and Aquilia Risk
will be made by Aquilia Southwest.  Aquilia wanted us to change the
counterparty to Aquilia Southwest but it was explained to them that these
were EOL deals and the counterparty would not be changed.

Scott Mills provided a query of Jan. EOL deals to (just for Texas business)
Settlements to help them gauge and anticipate potential counterparty issues.

Settlements might be able to have another billing address set up for Aquilia
Energy with the address being the San Antonio office in order to minimize the
effort to getting the invoices to the correct office.

I have not heard anything more regarding an assignment processes for Aquilia
Risk/Energy and would like to know were that stands.  I would like
clarification about Aquilia Risk having credit approval taken away for
Physical deals.

Thanks,
KC


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
12:54 PM ---------------------------
From: Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 04:46 PM
To: Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracey Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: AEC Marketing -Credit Reserve

Tracey,

Please take a credit reserve for the transaction detailed below.

Counterparty: AEC Marketing (USA) Inc.
TAGG #: QT5176.1
Enron Entity: ENA
Transaction: 5-year Physical Nat Gas Purchase , 55,000 mmbtu/day (avg.),
Fixed Basis Price $-.305
Originator: Barry Tycholiz
Credit Reserve Amount: $75,000.00


Attached is the most recent draft of the presentation after Ken's comments at today's conference call.  In addition , it has been reformatted with a consistent style.