What I'm saying is that to argue that our ancestors were sexual omnivores is no more a criticism of monogamy than to argue that our ancestors were dietary omnivores is a criticism of vegetarianism.
Estoy diciendo que argumentar que nuestros antepasados ​​ eran omnívoros sexuales no es más crítico hacia la monogamia que argumentar que nuestros antepasados eran omnívoros dietéticos, como crítica al vegetarianismo.