If willing buyers and willing sellers were trading claims happily, then, as long as they were “professional” investors, there was no legitimate reason to interfere in their markets. These people were “consenting adults in private,” and the state should avert its gaze.
Se quindi acquirenti e venditori erano disposti a negoziare felicemente le proprie richieste di indennizzo, a patto che fossero investitori “esperti”, non vi era alcuna ragione legittima per interferire nelle loro compravendite: erano “adulti consenzienti in privato”, e lo stato avrebbe dovuto distogliere lo sguardo.