<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"Following the 2010 Progress Report on Turkey and the Special Report 16/2009 on the European Commission’s management of pre-accession assistance to Turkey, could the Commission answer the following questions?  1.What amounts of pre-accession funds have been allocated by the Union, and to which specific projects, in the area of preventing, monitoring and combating corruption in Turkey since it acquired the status of a candidate country? What amounts of the allocated funds have already been paid out to the beneficiaries? What were the exact amounts co-financed by domestic authorities? For each of these questions, please provide statistical data for every project on a yearly basis, separately for each of the years 2000,2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.  2.What amounts of pre-accession funds has theEU allocated, and to which specific projects, for reform of the judicial system in Turkey since it acquired the status of a candidate country? What amounts of the allocated funds have already been paid out to the beneficiaries? What were the exact amounts co-financed by domestic authorities? For each of these questions, please provide statistical data for every project on a yearly basis, separately for each of the years 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.  3.What effective results, added value and impact have been obtained through the allocation of pre-accession funds to the fight against corruption and the reform of the judicial system? Please also provide information regarding the funded projects’ compliance with the eligibility rules.  4.How does the Commission plan to support financially the continuation of the reforms of the judiciary and the fight against corruption in Turkey?  5.What concrete initiatives is the Commission working on for the evaluation of pre-accession funds spent on individual projects in Turkey, as there was not any procedure for evaluation until 2008?   6.How has the Commission been addressing the weaknesses in the decentralised implementation system, especially overall programming and performance management, as recommended by the Court of Auditors in its 2009 special report, ‘The European Commission’s management of pre-accession assistance to Turkey’?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [19]. </s>
Following the 2010 Progress Report on Turkey and the Special Report 16/2009 on the European Commission’s management of pre-accession assistance to Turkey, could the Commission answer the following questions?  1.What amounts of pre-accession funds have been allocated by the Union, and to which specific projects, in the area of preventing, monitoring and combating corruption in Turkey since it acquired the status of a candidate country? What amounts of the allocated funds have already been paid out to the beneficiaries? What were the exact amounts co-financed by domestic authorities? For each of these questions, please provide statistical data for every project on a yearly basis, separately for each of the years 2000,2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.  2.What amounts of pre-accession funds has theEU allocated, and to which specific projects, for reform of the judicial system in Turkey since it acquired the status of a candidate country? What amounts of the allocated funds have already been paid out to the beneficiaries? What were the exact amounts co-financed by domestic authorities? For each of these questions, please provide statistical data for every project on a yearly basis, separately for each of the years 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.  3.What effective results, added value and impact have been obtained through the allocation of pre-accession funds to the fight against corruption and the reform of the judicial system? Please also provide information regarding the funded projects’ compliance with the eligibility rules.  4.How does the Commission plan to support financially the continuation of the reforms of the judiciary and the fight against corruption in Turkey?  5.What concrete initiatives is the Commission working on for the evaluation of pre-accession funds spent on individual projects in Turkey, as there was not any procedure for evaluation until 2008?   6.How has the Commission been addressing the weaknesses in the decentralised implementation system, especially overall programming and performance management, as recommended by the Court of Auditors in its 2009 special report, ‘The European Commission’s management of pre-accession assistance to Turkey’?