<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"A number of studies, including a comprehensive survey by Chalmers University of Technology published in Nature in December 2018(1), have shown that organically grown products have a greater impact on the climate than conventionally produced food. One of the reasons for this is that organic farming requires larger areas of land than traditional farming.According to its farm-to-fork strategy, the Commission wants at least 25% of EU farmland to be organic by 2030. At the same time, however, the Commission – with the support of the Member States and the European Parliament – has also made far-reaching commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.The two objectives appear to contradict each other. With that in mind:1.Does the Commission agree with the research community’s findings that organic farming has a larger carbon footprint than conventional farming?2.If so, what conclusions does the Commission draw from this?3.Does the Commission take the view that the objective of drastically increasing organic farming in Europe is consistent with the objective of drastically cutting carbon emissions, and if so, how?  (1)https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0757-z"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [7]. </s>
A number of studies, including a comprehensive survey by Chalmers University of Technology published in Nature in December 2018(1), have shown that organically grown products have a greater impact on the climate than conventionally produced food. One of the reasons for this is that organic farming requires larger areas of land than traditional farming.According to its farm-to-fork strategy, the Commission wants at least 25% of EU farmland to be organic by 2030. At the same time, however, the Commission – with the support of the Member States and the European Parliament – has also made far-reaching commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.The two objectives appear to contradict each other. With that in mind:1.Does the Commission agree with the research community’s findings that organic farming has a larger carbon footprint than conventional farming?2.If so, what conclusions does the Commission draw from this?3.Does the Commission take the view that the objective of drastically increasing organic farming in Europe is consistent with the objective of drastically cutting carbon emissions, and if so, how?  (1)https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0757-z