<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"The European Anti-Fraud Office, OLAF, is investigating suspected irregularities (case reference IO/2001/4030) in connection with the approval of a project entitled Geoplantour submitted under the EU's TERRA programme in 1997.    Can the Commission answer the following:      1.    Is the Geoplantour project approved in 1997 simply a modified version of the original project No57B, """"""""Bugewitzer Oderhaff-Zone"""""""", or is a totally new project actually involved?      2.    How does the Commission explain the fact that Directorate-General XVI (currently regional policy) approved a Geoplantour project in the summer of 1997, i.e. a year after the deadline of 8 July 1986, contrary to the implementing provisions for the TERRA programme and the principle of equal treatment?      3.    How does the Commission explain the fact that the Directorate-General for Regional Policy has to date failed to answer two written inquiries from OLAF, thereby delaying OLAF's investigations into this matter?      4.    What does the Commission now intend to do to step up the investigation into this case?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [12]. </s>
The European Anti-Fraud Office, OLAF, is investigating suspected irregularities (case reference IO/2001/4030) in connection with the approval of a project entitled Geoplantour submitted under the EU's TERRA programme in 1997.    Can the Commission answer the following:      1.    Is the Geoplantour project approved in 1997 simply a modified version of the original project No57B, """"""""Bugewitzer Oderhaff-Zone"""""""", or is a totally new project actually involved?      2.    How does the Commission explain the fact that Directorate-General XVI (currently regional policy) approved a Geoplantour project in the summer of 1997, i.e. a year after the deadline of 8 July 1986, contrary to the implementing provisions for the TERRA programme and the principle of equal treatment?      3.    How does the Commission explain the fact that the Directorate-General for Regional Policy has to date failed to answer two written inquiries from OLAF, thereby delaying OLAF's investigations into this matter?      4.    What does the Commission now intend to do to step up the investigation into this case?