<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"The new security measures that were introduced at airports on 6November 2006 are seen by some experts, users and airlines are totally disproportionate and difficult to justify.  The new rules on liquids were imposed directly on all European authorities, with no parliamentary consultation or debate, making it impossible to harmonise the relevant criteria. They are based on a technical proposal discussed and agreed behind closed doors on 27September 2006 by the Committee on Civil Aviation Security, a purely technical body. One week later, without any prior consultation of Parliament, the Commission adopted them in the form of Regulation (EC) No1546/2006(1), thus giving them the status of European legislation. Given that the rules have not been published, members of the public have no means of checking and, where necessary, challenging their implementation, since they have no right of access to them. The same applies to the security staff obliged to apply them during airport checks, who are obliged to act on the basis of a mere sheet of instructions, and, furthermore, have sole decision-making powers in this connection.  We believe that security can only be ensured by means of clear and practical measures that are easy to understand and readily available to the general public and are implemented in a uniform manner in all Member States, in order to ensure that measures such as those at issue here, which are intended to ensure passenger safety, are not seen to cause uncertainty, thus creating mistrust and confusion in the many sectors affected.  Given the above, does the Commission intend to review the current legal framework, with a view to clarifying the rules? Would it not be appropriate to organise a campaign to explain the situation and raise public awareness?    (1)OJL286, 17.10.2006, p.6."
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [10]. </s>
The new security measures that were introduced at airports on 6November 2006 are seen by some experts, users and airlines are totally disproportionate and difficult to justify.  The new rules on liquids were imposed directly on all European authorities, with no parliamentary consultation or debate, making it impossible to harmonise the relevant criteria. They are based on a technical proposal discussed and agreed behind closed doors on 27September 2006 by the Committee on Civil Aviation Security, a purely technical body. One week later, without any prior consultation of Parliament, the Commission adopted them in the form of Regulation (EC) No1546/2006(1), thus giving them the status of European legislation. Given that the rules have not been published, members of the public have no means of checking and, where necessary, challenging their implementation, since they have no right of access to them. The same applies to the security staff obliged to apply them during airport checks, who are obliged to act on the basis of a mere sheet of instructions, and, furthermore, have sole decision-making powers in this connection.  We believe that security can only be ensured by means of clear and practical measures that are easy to understand and readily available to the general public and are implemented in a uniform manner in all Member States, in order to ensure that measures such as those at issue here, which are intended to ensure passenger safety, are not seen to cause uncertainty, thus creating mistrust and confusion in the many sectors affected.  Given the above, does the Commission intend to review the current legal framework, with a view to clarifying the rules? Would it not be appropriate to organise a campaign to explain the situation and raise public awareness?    (1)OJL286, 17.10.2006, p.6.