<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"It has been widely claimed that Article12 of the proposal for a directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (COM(2016)0593) is needed as a tool to fix the alleged legal uncertainty created in certain Member States by the HP/Reprobel ruling (C-572/13), in which the publisher’s right to a share of the compensation paid for uses under exceptions was disputed.  The HP/Reprobel case was only about compensation paid for private copying and reprographic rights. However, the proposed Article12 would give publishers an unlimited share of all compensation paid for uses under exceptions and limitations now existing and any created in the future. This goes much further than the scope of the compensation in question in the HP/Reprobel case.  An unlimited right to a share of compensation would unjustly transfer money from authors to publishers, give publishers an even stronger negotiating position and cause legal uncertainty, e.g.regarding existing publishing contracts and recipients of compensation.  Why are there no limitations to the scope of Article12 in the Commission’s proposal? What is the justification for an unlimited right to a share of all compensation paid for uses of works under all exceptions and limitations to copyright?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [15]. </s>
It has been widely claimed that Article12 of the proposal for a directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (COM(2016)0593) is needed as a tool to fix the alleged legal uncertainty created in certain Member States by the HP/Reprobel ruling (C-572/13), in which the publisher’s right to a share of the compensation paid for uses under exceptions was disputed.  The HP/Reprobel case was only about compensation paid for private copying and reprographic rights. However, the proposed Article12 would give publishers an unlimited share of all compensation paid for uses under exceptions and limitations now existing and any created in the future. This goes much further than the scope of the compensation in question in the HP/Reprobel case.  An unlimited right to a share of compensation would unjustly transfer money from authors to publishers, give publishers an even stronger negotiating position and cause legal uncertainty, e.g.regarding existing publishing contracts and recipients of compensation.  Why are there no limitations to the scope of Article12 in the Commission’s proposal? What is the justification for an unlimited right to a share of all compensation paid for uses of works under all exceptions and limitations to copyright?