<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"The European Investment Bank (EIB) has provided finance for the ‘Societé des Plantations de Mbanga (SPM)’ in Cameroon since 2008.  There are reports from SPM employees that they are exposed to hazardous spray toxins with no form of protection and that, in general, they work under wretched conditions with unreasonably long hours and without access to basic safety equipment, such as appropriate footwear. Several workers have complained to SPM about the unreasonable and dangerous conditions but SPM has ignored the complaints.  Will the Commission investigate on what grounds the EIB chose to provide finance for SPM in 2008? Will the Commission also investigate to what extent the EIB was aware of conditions at SPM, including whether the EIB may have financed SPM in full knowledge of workers' conditions at SPM?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [5]. </s>
The European Investment Bank (EIB) has provided finance for the ‘Societé des Plantations de Mbanga (SPM)’ in Cameroon since 2008.  There are reports from SPM employees that they are exposed to hazardous spray toxins with no form of protection and that, in general, they work under wretched conditions with unreasonably long hours and without access to basic safety equipment, such as appropriate footwear. Several workers have complained to SPM about the unreasonable and dangerous conditions but SPM has ignored the complaints.  Will the Commission investigate on what grounds the EIB chose to provide finance for SPM in 2008? Will the Commission also investigate to what extent the EIB was aware of conditions at SPM, including whether the EIB may have financed SPM in full knowledge of workers' conditions at SPM?