<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"Can the Council explain why, whenever an individual appeals to the Court of First Instance requesting that a regulation adopted by the Council or Commission (except in cases involving anti-dumping issues or state aids) be annulled, the Community institutions automatically and systematically, without fail, raise an objection of inadmissibility against such an appeal?  Can the Council indicate how many such appeals there have been and in what percentage of cases has no objection been raised?  Does the Council not consider that such repeated instances on the part of the Community institutions could result in the absurd situation of a Community which, while assuming ever greater legislative powers by means of directly applicable acts, puts more obstacles in the way of individuals wishing to have access to justice and defend their rights by means of the only judicial bodies competent to rule on the legality of Community acts which may be detrimental to those individuals?  Does the Council consider that this attitude is consistent with the right of each individual to have access to an impartial, independent court in order to uphold his or her rights, as enshrined in the constitutions of all the Member States and in particular in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [2]. </s>
Can the Council explain why, whenever an individual appeals to the Court of First Instance requesting that a regulation adopted by the Council or Commission (except in cases involving anti-dumping issues or state aids) be annulled, the Community institutions automatically and systematically, without fail, raise an objection of inadmissibility against such an appeal?  Can the Council indicate how many such appeals there have been and in what percentage of cases has no objection been raised?  Does the Council not consider that such repeated instances on the part of the Community institutions could result in the absurd situation of a Community which, while assuming ever greater legislative powers by means of directly applicable acts, puts more obstacles in the way of individuals wishing to have access to justice and defend their rights by means of the only judicial bodies competent to rule on the legality of Community acts which may be detrimental to those individuals?  Does the Council consider that this attitude is consistent with the right of each individual to have access to an impartial, independent court in order to uphold his or her rights, as enshrined in the constitutions of all the Member States and in particular in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights?