<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"Since January2017, an amendment to Act No152/1995 on foodstuffs has been in effect. Section6(b)(3) of the amended Act obliges private laboratories, which food business operators commission to test their products, to directly notify the state-designated authorities of all test results in which it has been established that the food is injurious to health or unsafe (referring to Article3(1)(d)of Regulation 882/2004). However, food business operators do not have to be made aware of such notifications. The amendment does not specify the penalty or the liability of the private laboratory for failure to comply with that obligation.  Section6(b)(3) reads as follows: ‘A legal person or natural person performing the analysis of foodstuffs intended to be placed on the market who finds that the food is injurious to health is obliged to report this without delay to the national veterinary and food authority.’  Is there a provision under existing European law that authorises or requires Member States to adopt a measure that obliges private laboratories commissioned by food business operators to directly inform the competent authorities of the results of their tests if it is found that the food is injurious to human or animal health?  Was Slovakia obliged to notify the Commission of such a change to its national legislation under Directive2015/1535?  What are the consequences of failure of a Member State to report a draft technical regulation to the Commission under Directive2015/1535?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [4]. </s>
Since January2017, an amendment to Act No152/1995 on foodstuffs has been in effect. Section6(b)(3) of the amended Act obliges private laboratories, which food business operators commission to test their products, to directly notify the state-designated authorities of all test results in which it has been established that the food is injurious to health or unsafe (referring to Article3(1)(d)of Regulation 882/2004). However, food business operators do not have to be made aware of such notifications. The amendment does not specify the penalty or the liability of the private laboratory for failure to comply with that obligation.  Section6(b)(3) reads as follows: ‘A legal person or natural person performing the analysis of foodstuffs intended to be placed on the market who finds that the food is injurious to health is obliged to report this without delay to the national veterinary and food authority.’  Is there a provision under existing European law that authorises or requires Member States to adopt a measure that obliges private laboratories commissioned by food business operators to directly inform the competent authorities of the results of their tests if it is found that the food is injurious to human or animal health?  Was Slovakia obliged to notify the Commission of such a change to its national legislation under Directive2015/1535?  What are the consequences of failure of a Member State to report a draft technical regulation to the Commission under Directive2015/1535?