<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"In the past growers of certain kinds of fruit varieties were able to apply for a grubbing-up premium. This premium was introduced by the EEC to curb overproduction of fruit. However, since 2000 it is no longer legally possible under the GMO Regulation to arrange for restrictions on production through use of the grubbing-up premium. There are certainly alternatives at Member State level, but these are governed by strict conditions.  The grubbing-up premium was made subject to a number of conditions, such as set-aside and converting the land to countryside or woodland. On no account may trees be planted on that land again. Some growers want to diversify, however, and innovate by uprooting trees and then planting new varieties in order to capitalise on changing market circumstances or in response to other situations (such as the loss of the Russian market as a result of Russia’s boycott).  1.In view of Russia’s boycott, which is proving to be structural, are there any ways in which growers could, in exceptional cases, be granted a grubbing-up premium or other type of support so they can switch to producing different crops?  2.If not, what alternatives are there for growers who want to innovate and diversify their produce?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [4]. </s>
In the past growers of certain kinds of fruit varieties were able to apply for a grubbing-up premium. This premium was introduced by the EEC to curb overproduction of fruit. However, since 2000 it is no longer legally possible under the GMO Regulation to arrange for restrictions on production through use of the grubbing-up premium. There are certainly alternatives at Member State level, but these are governed by strict conditions.  The grubbing-up premium was made subject to a number of conditions, such as set-aside and converting the land to countryside or woodland. On no account may trees be planted on that land again. Some growers want to diversify, however, and innovate by uprooting trees and then planting new varieties in order to capitalise on changing market circumstances or in response to other situations (such as the loss of the Russian market as a result of Russia’s boycott).  1.In view of Russia’s boycott, which is proving to be structural, are there any ways in which growers could, in exceptional cases, be granted a grubbing-up premium or other type of support so they can switch to producing different crops?  2.If not, what alternatives are there for growers who want to innovate and diversify their produce?