<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"In its judgment in the Schrems I case, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) pointed out that indiscriminate access by intelligence authorities to the content of electronic communications violates the essence of the right to the confidentiality of communications as provided for in Article 7 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Meanwhile, in Schrems II, the court pointed out that the United States does not provide sufficient legal remedies against mass surveillance for non-US persons, and that this violates the essence of the right to a legal remedy as provided for in Article 47 of the Charter.The United Kingdom is said to have ‘no-spying’ arrangements with the United States, Australia, New Zealand and Canada.1.How does the UK intelligence authorities’ access to the content of electronic communications differ from that of the US intelligence authorities?2.How will the Commission ensure that the CJEU does not strike down its upcoming adequacy decision concerning the UK’s data processing regime for the same reasons it did in the Schrems cases?3.As part of its efforts to adopt a legally sound adequacy decision concerning the UK’s data processing regime, will the Commission demand that the UK strikes a ‘no-spying’ agreement with the Member States? If not, why not?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [2]. </s>
In its judgment in the Schrems I case, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) pointed out that indiscriminate access by intelligence authorities to the content of electronic communications violates the essence of the right to the confidentiality of communications as provided for in Article 7 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Meanwhile, in Schrems II, the court pointed out that the United States does not provide sufficient legal remedies against mass surveillance for non-US persons, and that this violates the essence of the right to a legal remedy as provided for in Article 47 of the Charter.The United Kingdom is said to have ‘no-spying’ arrangements with the United States, Australia, New Zealand and Canada.1.How does the UK intelligence authorities’ access to the content of electronic communications differ from that of the US intelligence authorities?2.How will the Commission ensure that the CJEU does not strike down its upcoming adequacy decision concerning the UK’s data processing regime for the same reasons it did in the Schrems cases?3.As part of its efforts to adopt a legally sound adequacy decision concerning the UK’s data processing regime, will the Commission demand that the UK strikes a ‘no-spying’ agreement with the Member States? If not, why not?