<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"The preamble to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) is worded in terms that are no longer appropriate in this day and age. Scarcely anyone today still considers that """"""""nuclear energy represents an essential resource for the development and invigoration of industry"""""""", or that it """"""""will permit the advancement of the cause of peace"""""""". Nor is it any longer a concern of most Member States or their peoples to """"""""create the conditions necessary for the development of a powerful nuclear industry"""""""".  Can the Council still identify today with the wording of the preamble expressing the motives of the parties to the original treaty in concluding a treaty at that time?  If not, will the Council give consideration to undertaking a review of the Euratom Treaty - say by integrating such provisions of that Treaty as are still relevant today into the EC Treaty?  Is consideration being given to placing a review of the Euratom Treaty on the agenda of the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [8]. </s>
The preamble to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) is worded in terms that are no longer appropriate in this day and age. Scarcely anyone today still considers that """"""""nuclear energy represents an essential resource for the development and invigoration of industry"""""""", or that it """"""""will permit the advancement of the cause of peace"""""""". Nor is it any longer a concern of most Member States or their peoples to """"""""create the conditions necessary for the development of a powerful nuclear industry"""""""".  Can the Council still identify today with the wording of the preamble expressing the motives of the parties to the original treaty in concluding a treaty at that time?  If not, will the Council give consideration to undertaking a review of the Euratom Treaty - say by integrating such provisions of that Treaty as are still relevant today into the EC Treaty?  Is consideration being given to placing a review of the Euratom Treaty on the agenda of the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference?