<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"Both during the recent visit to the Basque country by the Committee on Fisheries in February 2010, and at a public hearing on the shape that the common fisheries policy should take in relation to trade and market organisation, representatives of European canning firms complained about systematic failure to comply with the production conditions applicable to ensure that canned fish imported into the Community meets the same standards as that produced within the Community. Business people working in the sector have reiterated that both the source of the fish canned, particularly in South East Asian industries, and the employment conditions for workers employed by those industries do not match the criteria imposed on the European industry. They have further drawn attention to manufacturing processes and health and hygiene conditions, which are also far removed from European standards. Today it was announced that canning firms have forwarded a study to the Commission which states that this situation applies to 65% of canned fish imported from third countries. If this figure is accurate, it would indicate a serious failure on the part of inspection systems.    Can the Commission answer the following questions:      1.  According to the Commission's organisation chart, which body or bodies within the Commission are responsible for carrying out these inspections?      2.  What are the aims of these inspections?      3.  How many inspectors does the Commission have to carry out this work? How are the teams that carry out these inspections put together?      4.  When and how are inspections conducted? Are they carried out on a regular basis?      5.  How are the countries whose industries are to be subject to inspection selected?      6.  What publicity is given to the results of these inspections?      7.  How does the Commission assess the results of this work in the light of the figures on irregularities affecting canned fish reported at the public hearing of the Committee on Fisheries?      8.  Does the Commission share the concerns of the European canning sector regarding this problem?      9.  Does it consider the report that 65% of imported canned fish does not comply with European rules to be an accurate figure?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [4]. </s>
Both during the recent visit to the Basque country by the Committee on Fisheries in February 2010, and at a public hearing on the shape that the common fisheries policy should take in relation to trade and market organisation, representatives of European canning firms complained about systematic failure to comply with the production conditions applicable to ensure that canned fish imported into the Community meets the same standards as that produced within the Community. Business people working in the sector have reiterated that both the source of the fish canned, particularly in South East Asian industries, and the employment conditions for workers employed by those industries do not match the criteria imposed on the European industry. They have further drawn attention to manufacturing processes and health and hygiene conditions, which are also far removed from European standards. Today it was announced that canning firms have forwarded a study to the Commission which states that this situation applies to 65% of canned fish imported from third countries. If this figure is accurate, it would indicate a serious failure on the part of inspection systems.    Can the Commission answer the following questions:      1.  According to the Commission's organisation chart, which body or bodies within the Commission are responsible for carrying out these inspections?      2.  What are the aims of these inspections?      3.  How many inspectors does the Commission have to carry out this work? How are the teams that carry out these inspections put together?      4.  When and how are inspections conducted? Are they carried out on a regular basis?      5.  How are the countries whose industries are to be subject to inspection selected?      6.  What publicity is given to the results of these inspections?      7.  How does the Commission assess the results of this work in the light of the figures on irregularities affecting canned fish reported at the public hearing of the Committee on Fisheries?      8.  Does the Commission share the concerns of the European canning sector regarding this problem?      9.  Does it consider the report that 65% of imported canned fish does not comply with European rules to be an accurate figure?