<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"Commissioner Malmström has presented her Green Paper on family reunification (COM(2011)0735).  1.Why does the Green Paper make suggestions concerning ways of relaxing policy but not ways of making it more stringent? How does the Commission defend this shameless partiality?  2.What relevant data and research can the Commission adduce in support of its thesis that family reunification contributes to the integration of aliens?  3.Why is the Green Paper strongly predisposed against the desire on the part of the Netherlands to tighten up the rules on family migration — an impression which seems to be further reinforced by statements such as the following made by Commissioner Malmström: ‘In the Netherlands, some participants in the debate seem to regard the existing rules on family reunification as the cause of all integration problems’ and ‘The EU countries have themselves decided that they could come, and now they have the right to be together with their families’(1)?  4.Does the Commission realise that in the Netherlands there is little public support for the type of dated ideas which Commissioner Malmström propagates and that it is undemocratic to fail to take account of this fact? If not, why not?    (1)‘Migranten hebben recht op gezinsleven’ [Migrants have a right to family life], De Volkskrant, 15 November 2011."
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [9]. </s>
Commissioner Malmström has presented her Green Paper on family reunification (COM(2011)0735).  1.Why does the Green Paper make suggestions concerning ways of relaxing policy but not ways of making it more stringent? How does the Commission defend this shameless partiality?  2.What relevant data and research can the Commission adduce in support of its thesis that family reunification contributes to the integration of aliens?  3.Why is the Green Paper strongly predisposed against the desire on the part of the Netherlands to tighten up the rules on family migration — an impression which seems to be further reinforced by statements such as the following made by Commissioner Malmström: ‘In the Netherlands, some participants in the debate seem to regard the existing rules on family reunification as the cause of all integration problems’ and ‘The EU countries have themselves decided that they could come, and now they have the right to be together with their families’(1)?  4.Does the Commission realise that in the Netherlands there is little public support for the type of dated ideas which Commissioner Malmström propagates and that it is undemocratic to fail to take account of this fact? If not, why not?    (1)‘Migranten hebben recht op gezinsleven’ [Migrants have a right to family life], De Volkskrant, 15 November 2011.