<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"Paragraph D of European Parliament Resolution P6_TA(2005)0078 of 10March 2005 on ‘Financing Natura2000’ (2004/2164(INI)) recognises the strategic importance of the Natura2000 network, which is ‘made up of sites designated under the Birds Directive and Council Directive92/43/EEC of 21May 1992 (the “Habitats Directive”)’.  Paragraph F of the same resolution looks at the social importance of the activities carried out by farmers and forest owners.  Paragraph N points out that the Commission and the Council, in adopting the Habitats Directive in 1992, ‘made a clear commitment to ensure that landowners and landusers would not bear the financial burden of the measures in the directive, strongly urging that this promise be kept.’  Several farmers’ associations in Italy are complaining about the lack of any financial support from the state and from the European Union and report a sharp increase in expenditure for managing their land, in particular with regard to the drawing up of studies and environmental impact assessments.   Can the Commission say whether the funds available under the Natura2000 network are of a compensatory nature for the restrictions placed on landowners regarding the use of their land in the abovementioned protected areas? Should this not be the case, how can those funds be legally defined and can they be combined with CAP incentives?  Can the Commission say how much funding has been allocated to each individual Member State under the Natura2000 network programme and whether that funding has already been received by landowners and landusers and by those who actually have to bear the costs deriving from the implementation of the abovementioned Community legislation?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [4]. </s>
Paragraph D of European Parliament Resolution P6_TA(2005)0078 of 10March 2005 on ‘Financing Natura2000’ (2004/2164(INI)) recognises the strategic importance of the Natura2000 network, which is ‘made up of sites designated under the Birds Directive and Council Directive92/43/EEC of 21May 1992 (the “Habitats Directive”)’.  Paragraph F of the same resolution looks at the social importance of the activities carried out by farmers and forest owners.  Paragraph N points out that the Commission and the Council, in adopting the Habitats Directive in 1992, ‘made a clear commitment to ensure that landowners and landusers would not bear the financial burden of the measures in the directive, strongly urging that this promise be kept.’  Several farmers’ associations in Italy are complaining about the lack of any financial support from the state and from the European Union and report a sharp increase in expenditure for managing their land, in particular with regard to the drawing up of studies and environmental impact assessments.   Can the Commission say whether the funds available under the Natura2000 network are of a compensatory nature for the restrictions placed on landowners regarding the use of their land in the abovementioned protected areas? Should this not be the case, how can those funds be legally defined and can they be combined with CAP incentives?  Can the Commission say how much funding has been allocated to each individual Member State under the Natura2000 network programme and whether that funding has already been received by landowners and landusers and by those who actually have to bear the costs deriving from the implementation of the abovementioned Community legislation?