<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"On 1May 2004, when enlargement took place, new arrangements for interpreting (request and pay) were introduced.  In practical terms this means that a high level of interpretation is systematically provided for a limited number of meetings. For other meetings, a fixed sum of EUR2million is allocated for each language, which the Member States themselves may disburse. If not all the money is spent on interpreters, two thirds of the unused part may be used for delegation members' travel expenses.  Can the Council provide an overview of the use and disbursement by the Member States of the fixed sum of EUR2million per language during the past 16months at Council meetings? How much of the initial budget was in fact used for interpretation? Will the Council assess this system? If so, when and in what way?  Is it already arriving at certain conclusions, with the result that certain languages are/will be used less?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [1]. </s>
On 1May 2004, when enlargement took place, new arrangements for interpreting (request and pay) were introduced.  In practical terms this means that a high level of interpretation is systematically provided for a limited number of meetings. For other meetings, a fixed sum of EUR2million is allocated for each language, which the Member States themselves may disburse. If not all the money is spent on interpreters, two thirds of the unused part may be used for delegation members' travel expenses.  Can the Council provide an overview of the use and disbursement by the Member States of the fixed sum of EUR2million per language during the past 16months at Council meetings? How much of the initial budget was in fact used for interpretation? Will the Council assess this system? If so, when and in what way?  Is it already arriving at certain conclusions, with the result that certain languages are/will be used less?