<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"Over the past few months the Italian Government has granted special incentives for the scrapping of motorcycles. This has led to a higher turnover for motorcycle manufacturers. At the same time, however, Piaggio, one of the top companies in the sector, has introduced tough shifts in which workers have had to work at weekends and on bank holidays throughout the summer with the same pay and harsher working conditions (the temperature can reach 40° C on the shop floor). Many workers have also been laid off, resulting in further loss of wages.    Can the Commission answer the following:      1.  Does the Commission therefore not think that the above-mentioned incentives could have been justified only if extra jobs had been created - which was patently not the case at Piaggio?      2.  Does it not believe that the Piaggio management should be censured for its disregard of European rules on working conditions?      3.  Is it not of the opinion that, unless Piaggio's increased turnover - brought about by the above incentives - leads to new jobs or improved working conditions, the ensuing capital, which could be invested by the company, could become an unfair competitive advantage, to the detriment of free competition?      4.  Will the Commission give its general views on the matter?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [5]. </s>
Over the past few months the Italian Government has granted special incentives for the scrapping of motorcycles. This has led to a higher turnover for motorcycle manufacturers. At the same time, however, Piaggio, one of the top companies in the sector, has introduced tough shifts in which workers have had to work at weekends and on bank holidays throughout the summer with the same pay and harsher working conditions (the temperature can reach 40° C on the shop floor). Many workers have also been laid off, resulting in further loss of wages.    Can the Commission answer the following:      1.  Does the Commission therefore not think that the above-mentioned incentives could have been justified only if extra jobs had been created - which was patently not the case at Piaggio?      2.  Does it not believe that the Piaggio management should be censured for its disregard of European rules on working conditions?      3.  Is it not of the opinion that, unless Piaggio's increased turnover - brought about by the above incentives - leads to new jobs or improved working conditions, the ensuing capital, which could be invested by the company, could become an unfair competitive advantage, to the detriment of free competition?      4.  Will the Commission give its general views on the matter?