<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"On 22July 2008, the Bonner Generalanzeiger newspaper published an interview with Commissioner Špidla on the subject of anti-discrimination policy.  One of the subjects discussed was registered cohabitation, a matter which, as the Council specifically confirmed to me during Question Time on 18June 2008, falls exclusively within national purview.  How then can the Commission criticise Germany's provisions in this field and demand that they be extended, for example with reference to the Army?  How can the Commissioner moreover call for a ‘ban on discrimination on grounds of race and ethnic identity’, although he has yet to take any action against the collectively discriminatory so-called ‘Beneš decrees’ in the Czech Republic, which clearly contravene EClaw, as well as Presidential Decree No5 and the so-called Immunity from Prosecution Law which even Prof. Frowein has described in his report as incompatible with EClaw? Is the Commission finally planning to take action on this?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [2]. </s>
On 22July 2008, the Bonner Generalanzeiger newspaper published an interview with Commissioner Špidla on the subject of anti-discrimination policy.  One of the subjects discussed was registered cohabitation, a matter which, as the Council specifically confirmed to me during Question Time on 18June 2008, falls exclusively within national purview.  How then can the Commission criticise Germany's provisions in this field and demand that they be extended, for example with reference to the Army?  How can the Commissioner moreover call for a ‘ban on discrimination on grounds of race and ethnic identity’, although he has yet to take any action against the collectively discriminatory so-called ‘Beneš decrees’ in the Czech Republic, which clearly contravene EClaw, as well as Presidential Decree No5 and the so-called Immunity from Prosecution Law which even Prof. Frowein has described in his report as incompatible with EClaw? Is the Commission finally planning to take action on this?