<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"As part of the ‘farm-to-fork’ strategy, the EU is proposing ways of encouraging consumers to make healthy dietary choices, for example by means of mandatory front-of-pack labelling (FOPL).However, the Nutri-Score profile, which appears to be the most widely established, uses an assessment algorithm thatundervalues staple Mediterranean food products,overlooking vitamins, antioxidants, biophenols and other content andfailing to factor in production and processing methods,thereby misleading consumers in direct breach of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011.Given thatthis profile is already the established norm in number of companies (Nestle, Colruyt, REWE, Ahold Delhaise, Danone)and already being implemented in a number of Member States (Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Switzerland),Greece, Italy and the Czech Republic have tabled a veto in the EU Agriculture and Fisheries Council in December 2020 for the above reasons.Furthermore, the International Olive Council has issued a notice (21 January 2021) objecting to Nutri-Score profiling because it is unfair and misleading for consumers.In view of this:1.Will the Commission examine Nutri-Score labelling closely with a view to remedying its shortcomings and correcting its evaluation algorithm?2.Will it take measures to prevent the companies concerned from enforcing these labelling standards, on which it has not yet made a decision, and prevent their arbitrary implementation by the Member States, in order to protect the health of European citizens?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [4]. </s>
As part of the ‘farm-to-fork’ strategy, the EU is proposing ways of encouraging consumers to make healthy dietary choices, for example by means of mandatory front-of-pack labelling (FOPL).However, the Nutri-Score profile, which appears to be the most widely established, uses an assessment algorithm thatundervalues staple Mediterranean food products,overlooking vitamins, antioxidants, biophenols and other content andfailing to factor in production and processing methods,thereby misleading consumers in direct breach of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011.Given thatthis profile is already the established norm in number of companies (Nestle, Colruyt, REWE, Ahold Delhaise, Danone)and already being implemented in a number of Member States (Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Switzerland),Greece, Italy and the Czech Republic have tabled a veto in the EU Agriculture and Fisheries Council in December 2020 for the above reasons.Furthermore, the International Olive Council has issued a notice (21 January 2021) objecting to Nutri-Score profiling because it is unfair and misleading for consumers.In view of this:1.Will the Commission examine Nutri-Score labelling closely with a view to remedying its shortcomings and correcting its evaluation algorithm?2.Will it take measures to prevent the companies concerned from enforcing these labelling standards, on which it has not yet made a decision, and prevent their arbitrary implementation by the Member States, in order to protect the health of European citizens?