<s>[INST] The next text is a question of a member of the European parliament:"Analysis of ERDF, ESF and EAGGF (Guidance) payments in Spain and Italy over the period 1989-93 reveals considerable variations.  Italy received ECU 1336,26 million in payments in 1991 and ECU 3406,6 million in 1993: in other words, payments effectively doubled. Spain, by contrast, received substantially less in 1993 than in 1992; the 1993 figure, only ECU 2971,3 million, was less than that for Italy.  Can the Commission explain the main reasons for these considerable variations?"
Analyze carefully the text and assign it to the most relevant policy area among those listed below. Do not explain your answer and return only a number.
Policy area numbers: 1 = Macroeconomics
2 = Civil Rights, Minority Issues and Civil Liberties
3 = Health
4 = Agriculture and Fisheries
5 = Labour, employment and pensions
6 = Education
7 = Environment
8 = Energy
9 = Immigration
10 = Transportation
12 = Law and Crime
13 = Social welfare
14 = Regional and Urban issues and Planning
15 = Banking, finance and domestic commerce issues
16 = Defence
17 = Space, science, technology, and communications issues
18 = Foreign trade
19 = International affairs and foreign aid
20 = Governance and government
21 = Public Lands, Water Management and Territorial Issues
23 = Culture and media
[/INST]. Answer = [14]. </s>
Analysis of ERDF, ESF and EAGGF (Guidance) payments in Spain and Italy over the period 1989-93 reveals considerable variations.  Italy received ECU 1336,26 million in payments in 1991 and ECU 3406,6 million in 1993: in other words, payments effectively doubled. Spain, by contrast, received substantially less in 1993 than in 1992; the 1993 figure, only ECU 2971,3 million, was less than that for Italy.  Can the Commission explain the main reasons for these considerable variations?