When there is insufficient supporting evidence to determine whether it is true or<unk> , an<unk>  is described as "unsubstantiated" or "unfounded".<unk> s that are determined to be<unk>  based on corroborating evidence can be divided into three categories: * A completely<unk>  allegation, in that the alleged events did not occur. * An allegation that describes events that did occur, but were perpetrated by an individual who is not accused, and in which the accused person is innocent. * An allegation that is<unk> , in that it mixes descriptions of events that actually happened with other events that did not occur. A<unk>  allegation can occur as the result of intentional lying on the part of the accuser; or unintentionally, due to a confabulation, either arising spontaneously due to mental illness or resulting from deliberate or accidental suggestive questioning, or faulty interviewing techniques. In 1997, researchers Poole and Lindsay suggested that separate labels should be applied to the two concepts, proposing that the term<unk>  allegations" be used specifically when the accuser is aware that they are lying, and<unk>  suspicions" for the wider range of<unk> s in which suggestive questioning may have been involved. When a person is suspected of a wrongdoing for which they are in fact responsible,<unk>  may be used to divert attention from one's own guilt".<unk>  may also arise in part from the conduct of the accused, particularly where the accused engages in behaviors consistent with having committed the suspected wrongdoing, either unconsciously or for purposes of appearing guilty. Additionally, once a<unk>  has been made – particularly an emotionally laden one – normal human emotional responses to being<unk> ly accused (such as fear, anger, or denial of the<unk>  may be misinterpreted as evidence of guilt.
False accusation
Anticipatory grief
Therapeutic nihilism
Incident stress
Accommodative excess
Autovampirism
False memory syndrome
Accommodative infacility