Figures from the 1982 Lebanon war showed that with proximal treatment, 90% of<unk>  casualties returned to their unit, usually within 72 hours. With rearward treatment, only 40% returned to their unit. It was also found that treatment efficacy went up with the application of a variety of front line treatment principles versus just one treatment. In Korea, similar statistics were seen, with 85% of US battle fatigue casualties returned to duty within three days and 10% returned to limited duties after several weeks. Though these numbers seem to promote the claims that proximal PIE or BICEPS treatment is generally effective at reducing the effects of<unk> , other data suggests that long term PTSD effects may result from the hasty return of affected individuals to<unk> . Both PIE and BICEPS are meant to return as many soldiers as possible to<unk> , and may actually have adverse effects on the long term health of service members who are rapidly returned to the front-line after<unk><unk>  control treatment. Although the PIE principles were used extensively in the Vietnam War, the post traumatic<unk>  disorder lifetime rate for Vietnam veterans was 30% in a 1989 US study and 21% in a 1996 Australian study. In a study of Israeli Veterans of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, 37% of veterans diagnosed with<unk>  during<unk>  were later diagnosed with PTSD, compared with 14% of control veterans.
Combat stress reaction
Self-harm
Body substance isolation
Stranger anxiety
Listener fatigue
Automatism 
Derealization
Semantic satiation