Although<unk>  has its advantage in terms of selecting embryos for implantation, the technology is unable to deselect all abnormal embryos. There is also a struggle to find a universal algorithm as attempts to validate published algorithms have proved unsuccessful. More work needs to be done in the scientific community, working as a cohesive unit to define the best possible algorithm that could lead to a single successful pregnancy. The benefits of using<unk>  in terms of improving clinical outcomes of<unk>  is still very unclear. A meta-analysis published in 2017, supported the idea of clinical benefits of time-lapse culture with<unk> embryo selection in<unk> , reporting reduced early pregnancy loss, higher ongoing pregnancy and higher live birth rates. However, the studies included in the meta analysis were carried out in selected populations and were of dubious quality, meaning we can not rely on this as conclusive evidence that<unk>  outcomes are improved by using<unk> embryo selection and time-lapse technology instead of standard morphological evaluation. Apart from this, there is limited reviewed evidence to support the clinical benefits of<unk>  and so robust prospective studies reporting clinical outcomes must be carried out before it can be concluded that<unk>  when combined with time-lapse technology has the ability to improve clinical outcomes of<unk> .
Morphokinetics IVF
Gonadotropin preparations
Hormonal IUDs
Progesterone vaginal ring
Ovarian drilling
Reproductive surgery
Hysterotomy
LGBT reproduction