A 2017 meta-analysis of family-based treatments for serious juvenile offenders found "modest, yet long-lasting, treatment effects" in reducing antisocial behavior and improving other outcomes when compared with conventional community services. A meta-analysis of<unk>  in 2014 reported small improvements in delinquency, psychological problems, and substance use, particularly with younger juveniles. In 2012 a literature review compared common treatments including cognitive behavioral therapy, 12-step facilitation,<unk> , psychoeducation, and motivational interviewing in an attempt to identify the best treatments for substance-abusing adolescents with conduct problems. The authors concluded that family-based interventions produced superior outcomes, and that<unk>  had "the most compelling evidence," noting that the providers are often well trained and supervised. Family-based interventions such as<unk>  may have farther reaching impacts as well when compared to other interventions. Specifically, Wagner et al. (2013) and Dopp et al (2017) conducted follow-up studies with clients and their families who had participated in either<unk>  or IT (Individual Therapy) 20-25 years earlier; they found that caregivers and siblings of clients who participated in<unk>  were themselves less likely to have been convicted of a felony.
Multisystemic therapy
Combination therapy
Neoadjuvant therapy
Targeted therapy
Differentiation therapy
Chemoradiotherapy
Radionuclide therapy
Stereotactic radiation therapy