Ioannidis (2005), "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False". The<unk>  (also called the replicability<unk>  and the reproducibility<unk>  is an ongoing methodological<unk>  in which it has been found that the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to reproduce. Because the reproducibility of empirical results is an essential part of the scientific method, such failures undermine the credibility of theories building on them and potentially call into question substantial parts of scientific knowledge. The<unk>  is frequently discussed in relation to psychology and medicine, where considerable efforts have been undertaken to re-investigate classic results, to determine both their reliability and, if found unreliable, the reasons for the failure. Data strongly indicate that other natural, and social sciences are affected as well. The phrase<unk>  was coined in the early 2010s as part of a growing awareness of the problem. Considerations around causes and remedies have given rise to a new scientific discipline called metascience, which uses methods of empirical research to examine empirical research practice. Since empirical research involves both obtaining and analyzing data, considerations about its reproducibility fall into two categories. The validation of the analysis and interpretation of the data obtained in a study runs under the term reproducibility in the narrow sense. The task of repeating the experiment or observational study to obtain new, independent data with the goal of reaching the same or similar conclusions as an original study is called<unk> .
Replication crisis
Breakthrough infection
Pandemic fatigue
Exacerbation
Second-impact syndrome
Ischemic cascade
Distributive shock
Cryptic shock