\begin{table}[htpb]
	\centering
	\caption{Testing accuracy of metric-based meta-learning methods on 5-way 5-shot miniImageNet classification. }
	\label{tabsimilarity}
	\begin{tabular}{|m{10cm}|m{2.3cm}|}
		\hline
		Method & Accuracy \\ \hline
		\cite{Vinyals2016} Matching Net & $60.0\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Mishra2018} SNAIL  & $68.88\pm 0.92\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Sung2018} Relation Net  & $65.32\pm 0.70\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Snell2017} Prototypical Net  & $68.20\pm 0.66\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Das2020} & $70.91\pm 0.85\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Li2020} Prototypical Net+TRAML  & $77.94\pm 0.57\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Li2020} AM3+TRAML  & $79.54\pm 0.60\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Guan2020} DAPNA  & $84.07 \pm 0.16\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Oreshkin2018} TADAM with $\alpha$, AT and TC  & $76.7\pm 0.3\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Oreshkin2018} TADAM without tuning  & $74.2\pm 0.2\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Gidaris2018} Dynamic few-shot with C128F feature extractor  & $73.00\pm 0.64\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Gidaris2018} with ResNet feature extractor  & $70.13\pm 0.68\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Gidaris2018} with cosine classifier and attention based weight generator  & $74.92\pm 0.36\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Gidaris2018} with cosine classifier and no weight generator  & $72.83\pm 0.35\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Triantafillou2017} mAP-SSVM  & $63.94\pm 0.72\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Triantafillou2017} mAP-DLM  & $63.70\pm 0.70\%$  \\ \hline
	\end{tabular}
\end{table}
Method Accuracy
[14] Matching Net 60.0%
[94] SNAIL 68.88 0.92%
±
[17] Relation Net 65.32 0.70%
±
[15] Prototypical Net 68.20 0.66%
±
[105] 70.91 0.85%
±
[95] Prototypical Net+TRAML 77.94 0.57%
±
[95] AM3+TRAML 79.54 0.60%
±
[11] DAPNA 84.07 0.16%
±
[84] TADAM with α, AT and TC 76.7 0.3%
±
[84] TADAM without tuning 74.2 0.2%
±
[96] Dynamic few-shot with C128F feature extractor 73.00 0.64%
±
[96] with ResNet feature extractor 70.13 0.68%
±
[96] with cosine classifier and attention based weight generator 74.92 0.36%
±
[96] with cosine classifier and no weight generator 72.83 0.35%
±
[89] mAP-SSVM 63.94 0.72%
±
[89] mAP-DLM 63.70 0.70%
±