\begin{table}[htpb]
	\centering
	\caption{Testing accuracy of meta-learning methods on 5-way 1-shot miniImageNet classification.}
	\label{tabbayes}
	\begin{tabular}{|m{10cm}|m{2.3cm}|}
		\hline
		Method & Accuracy \\ \hline
		\cite{Grant2018} LLAMA  & $49.40\pm 1.83\%$  \\ \hline 
		\cite{Yoon2018a} BMAML  & $53.8\pm 1.46\%$  \\ \hline 
		\cite{Finn2018} PLATIPUS  & $50.13\pm 1.86\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Gordon2018} VERSA  & $53.40\pm 1.82\%$  \\ \hline\hline
		\cite{Qiao2018} Activation to parameter with neural network  & $54.53 \pm
		0.40\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Qiao2018} wide residual network WRN  & $59.60 \pm 0.41\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Munkhdalai2018} AdaCNN with DF & $48.34 \pm 0.68\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Munkhdalai2018} AdaResNet with DF & $56.88 \pm 0.62\%$  \\ \hline\hline
		\cite{Vinyals2016} Matching Net & $46.6\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Snell2017} Prototypical Net  & $46.61\pm 0.78\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Das2020} PVRT & $52.68\pm 0.51\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Li2020} Prototypical Network+TRAML & $60.31\pm 0.48\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Sung2018} Relation Net & $50.44\pm 0.82\%$ \\ \hline 
		\cite{Mishra2018} SNAIL & $45.1\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Oreshkin2018} TADAM with $\alpha$, AT and TC  & $58.5 \pm 0.3\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Oreshkin2018} TADAM without tuning  & $56.5 \pm 0.4\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Gidaris2018} Dynamic few-shot with C128F feature extractor  & $55.95 \pm 0.84\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Gidaris2018} with ResNet feature extractor  & $55.45 \pm 0.89\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Gidaris2018} with cosine classifier and attention based weight generator  & $58.55 \pm 0.50\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Gidaris2018} with cosine classifier and no weight generator  & $54.55 \pm 0.44\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Triantafillou2017} mAP-SSVM & $50.32\pm 0.80\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Triantafillou2017} mAP-DLM & $50.28\pm 0.80\%$ \\ \hline\hline
		\cite{Finn2017} MAML & $48.7\pm 1.84\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Munkhdalai2017} MetaNet & $49.21 \pm 0.96\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Nichol2018} Reptile & $49.97\pm 0.32\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Li2017} Meta-SGD & $50.47\pm 1.87\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Ravi2019a} Meta-LSTM  & $43.44\pm 0.77\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Kim2018} Auto-Meta (without Transduction F=10) & $49.58\pm 0.20\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Kim2018} Auto-Meta (with Transduction F=12) & $57.58\pm 0.20\%$ \\ \hline
		\cite{Bertinetto2019} R2-D2  & $51.8\pm 0.2\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Bertinetto2019} LR-D2 with 5 iterations  & $51.9\pm 0.2\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Bertinetto2019} LR-D2 with 1 iteration  & $51.0\pm 0.2\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Lee2019} MetaOptNet-RidgeReg  & $61.41 \pm 0.61\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Lee2019} MetaOptNet-SVM  & $62.64 \pm 0.61\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Lee2019} MetaOptNet-SVM-trainval  & $64.09 \pm 0.62\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Liu2019} TPN  & $55.51\pm 0.86\%$  \\ \hline
		\cite{Rusu2019} LEO  & $61.76 \pm 0.08\%$  \\ \hline
	\end{tabular}
\end{table}
Method Accuracy
[101] LLAMA 49.40 1.83%
±
[62] BMAML 53.8 1.46%
±
[126] PLATIPUS 50.13 1.86%
±
[18] VERSA 53.40 1.82%
±
[93] Activation to parameter with neural network 54.53 0.40%
±
[93] wide residual network WRN 59.60 0.41%
±
[21] AdaCNN with DF 48.34 0.68%
±
[21] AdaResNet with DF 56.88 0.62%
±
[14] Matching Net 46.6%
[15] Prototypical Net 46.61 0.78%
±
[105] PVRT 52.68 0.51%
±
[95] Prototypical Network+TRAML 60.31 0.48%
±
[17] Relation Net 50.44 0.82%
±
[94] SNAIL 45.1%
[84] TADAM with α, AT and TC 58.5 0.3%
±
[84] TADAM without tuning 56.5 0.4%
±
[96] Dynamic few-shot with C128F feature extractor 55.95 0.84%
±
[96] with ResNet feature extractor 55.45 0.89%
±
[96] with cosine classifier and attention based weight generator 58.55 0.50%
±
[96] with cosine classifier and no weight generator 54.55 0.44%
±
[89] mAP-SSVM 50.32 0.80%
±
[89] mAP-DLM 50.28 0.80%
±
[12] MAML 48.7 1.84%
±
[23] MetaNet 49.21 0.96%
±
[60] Reptile 49.97 0.32%
±
[16] Meta-SGD 50.47 1.87%
±
[5] Meta-LSTM 43.44 0.77%
±
[123] Auto-Meta (without Transduction F=10) 49.58 0.20%
±
[123] Auto-Meta (with Transduction F=12) 57.58 0.20%
±
[85] R2-D2 51.8 0.2%
±
[85] LR-D2 with 5 iterations 51.9 0.2%
±
[85] LR-D2 with 1 iteration 51.0 0.2%
±
[81] MetaOptNet-RidgeReg 61.41 0.61%
±
[81] MetaOptNet-SVM 62.64 0.61%
±
[81] MetaOptNet-SVM-trainval 64.09 0.62%
±
[98] TPN 55.51 0.86%
±
[99] LEO 61.76 0.08%
±