\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\begin{tabular}[c]{|>{\centering\arraybackslash}m{1.8cm}|>{\centering\arraybackslash}m{2cm}|>{\centering\arraybackslash}m{1.8cm}|>{\centering\arraybackslash}m{2cm}|>{\centering\arraybackslash}m{1.2cm}|}
\hline
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Batching Scenario}&& \\
Iterations & Samples per iteration& Energy MAE (eV) & Structure MAE (\ang)\\
\hline\hline
20 & 1 & 0.0063 & 0.0037 \\ \hline
10 & 2 & 0.0069 & 0.0063 \\ \hline
5 & 4 & 0.0080 & 0.0067 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Comparison of different offline active learning batching scenarios on the structural relaxation of C/Cu(100). At each iteration, a varying number of queries are randomly made from the generated relaxation.  A tradeoff in performance and the number of samples per iteration is observed for a fixed total number of DFT calls $= 20$. All models trained here incorporated the proposed Morse prior.}
\label{table:batch}
\end{table}
Batching Scenario
Samples per
Iterations
iteration Energy
MAE (eV) Structure
MAE (˚A)
20 1 0.0063 0.0037
10 2 0.0069 0.0063
5 4 0.0080 0.0067