\begin{table}[t]
\centering
{\fontsize{8}{6}\selectfont
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{.3em}
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|}
\hline
(Setting) & Error $\%$ & Training $\%$ & Exploration $\%$  \\
Algorithm  & context=A1,A2,A3 & context=A1,A2,A3 & context=A1,A2,A3 \\
\hline
(Z1,S1) CoS & 0.7, 4.6, 4.8 & 0.3, 3, 2.8 & 1.4, 6.3, 8.5 \\
\hline
(Z1,S1) DCZA & 1.4, 3.5, 3.2 & 0.4, 1.3, 0.9 & 4, 5.9, 7 \\
\hline
(Z1,S2) CoS & 0.9, 39, 10 & 0.3, 3, 2.8 & 1.5, 6.5, 8.6 \\
\hline
(Z1,S2) DCZA & 1.9, 38, 4.8 & 0.4, 1.3, 1 & 4, 6, 7 \\
\hline
(Z2,S1) CoS & 16, 14, 41 & 8.5, 16, 79 & 55 27 20\\
\hline
(Z2,S1) DCZA & 31, 29, 29 & 33 19 87 & 66 66 12 \\
\hline 
\end{tabular}
}
\add{\vspace{-0.05in}}
\caption{Error, training and exploration percentages of CoS and DCZA under different simulation and parameter settings. (A1) context as the previous label, (A2) context as srcbytes feature, (A3) context as time.}
\label{tab:sim_results}
%\vspace{-0.4in}
\vspace{-0.2in}
\end{table}
(Setting)
Algorithm Error %
context=A1,A2,A3 Training %
context=A1,A2,A3 Exploration %
context=A1,A2,A3
(Z1,S1) CoS 0.7, 4.6, 4.8 0.3, 3, 2.8 1.4, 6.3, 8.5
(Z1,S1) DCZA 1.4, 3.5, 3.2 0.4, 1.3, 0.9 4, 5.9, 7
(Z1,S2) CoS 0.9, 39, 10 0.3, 3, 2.8 1.5, 6.5, 8.6
(Z1,S2) DCZA 1.9, 38, 4.8 0.4, 1.3, 1 4, 6, 7
(Z2,S1) CoS 16, 14, 41 8.5, 16, 79 55 27 20
(Z2,S1) DCZA 31, 29, 29 33 19 87 66 66 12