
USCA1 Opinion

	














                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________


        No. 97-1214

                                  STANLEY R. GREEN,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                 Defendant, Appellee.

                                 ____________________


                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                     [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Stanley R. Green on brief pro se.
            ________________
            Donald K. Stern, United States  Attorney, and George B. Henderson,
            _______________                               ____________________
        II,  Assistant   United  States   Attorney,  on  Motion   for  Summary
        __
        Disposition, for appellee.


                                 ____________________

                                     June 9, 1997
                                 ____________________



















                      Per Curiam.  We  carefully have reviewed the record
                      __________

            and the briefs of the parties.  We therefore summarily affirm
                                                         _________ ______

            the  judgment  of  the  district court  for  essentially  the

            reasons stated  in its  Memorandum and Order,  dated December

            30, 1996.  See Local Rule 27.1.
                       ___











































                                         -2-







