Middle ear surgery is performed on patients for a number of different reasons, most commonly for chronic recurring ear infections. When performing middle ear surgery, the ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeon (or “otolaryngologist”) typically visualizes the middle ear and the surgical procedure in one of two ways. In some cases, the surgeon uses a microscope, positioned in front of the surgeon's eyes, and she typically uses her non-dominant hand to hold a suction device and her dominant hand to hold a surgical tool. In other cases, the surgeon uses a handheld endoscope to visualize the middle ear. The use of a handheld endoscope is problematic in several different ways.
First, standard endoscopes have long shafts and are not made for use in the ear. When the ENT surgeon uses an endoscope in the ear, he has to hold the handle of the scope up in the air, over the patient's head, with the surgeon's hand suspended in the air, unsupported. This factor alone is problematic, because if the surgeon accidentally moves his unsupported hand during surgery, he could very easily move the distal end of the endoscope in a way that could damage the tympanic membrane or one or more of the delicate structures of the middle ear.
Second, compounding on the first issue, endoscopes are generally much heavier than the small, thin surgical tools used in middle ear procedures. The surgeon thus has an ergonomic imbalance between a relatively heavy endoscope in her non-dominant hand and a relatively light surgical device in her dominant hand. This imbalance adds to the difficulty in stabilizing the endoscope. Additionally, holding a heavy endoscope suspended over the patient's head during a surgical procedure may quickly lead to arm and hand fatigue for the surgeon.
Third, since the surgeon is holding the endoscope in one hand, that hand is no longer free to hold a suction device or a surgical tool. Thus, when an endoscope is used for visualization, the surgeon cannot use a suction device and visualize the inside of the ear at the same time.
Fourth, standard endoscopes have straight shafts, so the surgeon must hold the endoscope in a direct line straight back from the patient's ear. This straight-line position makes it impossible, or at least incredibly challenging, to use an endoscope and a microscope in the same surgical procedure, since the position of the endoscope is directly in the path of vision of the microscope. This is a drawback, because in some procedures an ENT surgeon would like to be able to switch back and forth quickly and easily between viewing with a microscope and viewing with an endoscope. It is also challenging for a surgeon to manipulate multiple tools with straight shafts held in two hands during an ear surgery procedure, because the hands must be held very close together (due to the small diameter of the ear canal), and the tools tend to bump into one another as the surgeon manipulates them to perform the procedure.
For at least these reasons, it would be advantageous to have an improved system and method for ear visualization. Ideally such a system and method would be easy to use, allow for good visualization of the ear, and be compatible with use of other ear surgery devices. At least some of these objectives will be addressed in this disclosure.