You are given a huge decimal number consisting of n digits. It is guaranteed that this number has no leading zeros. Each digit of this number is either 0 or 1.

You may perform several (possibly zero) operations with this number. During each operation you are allowed to change any digit of your number; you may change 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. It is possible that after some operation you can obtain a number with leading zeroes, but it does not matter for this problem.

You are also given two integers 0 ≤ y < x < n. Your task is to calculate the minimum number of operations you should perform to obtain the number that has remainder 10^y modulo 10^x. In other words, the obtained number should have remainder 10^y when divided by 10^x.

Input

The first line of the input contains three integers n, x, y (0 ≤ y < x < n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — the length of the number and the integers x and y, respectively.

The second line of the input contains one decimal number consisting of n digits, each digit of this number is either 0 or 1. It is guaranteed that the first digit of the number is 1.

Output

Print one integer — the minimum number of operations you should perform to obtain the number having remainder 10^y modulo 10^x. In other words, the obtained number should have remainder 10^y when divided by 10^x.

Examples

Input


11 5 2
11010100101


Output


1


Input


11 5 1
11010100101


Output


3

Note

In the first example the number will be 11010100100 after performing one operation. It has remainder 100 modulo 100000.

In the second example the number will be 11010100010 after performing three operations. It has remainder 10 modulo 100000.
def main():
	n,x,y=map(int,input().split())
	a=input()
	ans=0
	if a[n-y-1]!='1':
		ans+=1
	for i in range(n-x,n):
		if i==n-y-1:
			continue
		if a[i]!='0':
			ans+=1
	cout<<ans



#!/usr/bin/env python
import os
import sys
from io import BytesIO, IOBase
######## Python 2 and 3 footer by pajenegod and c1729

# Note because cf runs old PyPy3 version which doesn't have the sped up
# unicode strings, PyPy3 strings will many times be slower than pypy2.
# There is a way to get around this by using binary strings in PyPy3
# but its syntax is different which makes it kind of a mess to use.

# So on cf, use PyPy2 for best string performance.

py2 = round(0.5)
if py2:
    from future_builtins import ascii, filter, hex, map, oct, zip
    range = xrange

import os, sys
from io import IOBase, BytesIO

BUFSIZE = 8192
class FastIO(BytesIO):
    newlines = 0

    def __init__(self, file):
        self._file = file
        self._fd = file.fileno()
        self.writable = "x" in file.mode or "w" in file.mode
        self.write = super(FastIO, self).write if self.writable else None

    def _fill(self):
        s = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, BUFSIZE))
        self.seek((self.tell(), self.seek(0,2), super(FastIO, self).write(s))[0])
        return s

    def read(self):
        while self._fill(): pass
        return super(FastIO,self).read()

    def readline(self):
        while self.newlines == 0:
            s = self._fill(); self.newlines = s.count(b"\n") + (not s)
        self.newlines -= 1
        return super(FastIO, self).readline()

    def flush(self):
        if self.writable:
            os.write(self._fd, self.getvalue())
            self.truncate(0), self.seek(0)

class IOWrapper(IOBase):
    def __init__(self, file):
        self.buffer = FastIO(file)
        self.flush = self.buffer.flush
        self.writable = self.buffer.writable
        if py2:
            self.write = self.buffer.write
            self.read = self.buffer.read
            self.readline = self.buffer.readline
        else:
            self.write = lambda s:self.buffer.write(s.encode('ascii'))
            self.read = lambda:self.buffer.read().decode('ascii')
            self.readline = lambda:self.buffer.readline().decode('ascii')


sys.stdin, sys.stdout = IOWrapper(sys.stdin), IOWrapper(sys.stdout)
input = lambda: sys.stdin.readline().rstrip('\r\n')

# Cout implemented in Python
import sys
class ostream:
    def __lshift__(self,a):
        sys.stdout.write(str(a))
        return self
cout = ostream()
endl = '\n'

# Read all remaining integers in stdin, type is given by optional argument, this is fast
def readnumbers(zero = 0):
    conv = ord if py2 else lambda x:x
    A = []; numb = zero; sign = 1; i = 0; s = sys.stdin.buffer.read()
    try:
        while True:
            if s[i] >= b'0' [0]:
                numb = 10 * numb + conv(s[i]) - 48
            elif s[i] == b'-' [0]: sign = -1
            elif s[i] != b'\r' [0]:
                A.append(sign*numb)
                numb = zero; sign = 1
            i += 1
    except:pass
    if s and s[-1] >= b'0' [0]:
        A.append(sign*numb)
    return A

# My magical way of doing recursion in python. This
# isn't the fastest, but at least it works.
from types import GeneratorType
def bootstrap(func, stack=[]):
    def wrapped_function(*args, **kwargs):
        if stack:
            return func(*args, **kwargs)
        else:
            call = func(*args, **kwargs)
            while True:
                if type(call) is GeneratorType:
                    stack.append(call)
                    call = next(call)
                else:
                    stack.pop()
                    if not stack:
                        break
                    call = stack[-1].send(call)
            return call

    return wrapped_function

if __name__=="__main__":
	main()

