You are given a tree that consists of n nodes. You should label each of its n-1 edges with an integer in such way that satisfies the following conditions: 

  * each integer must be greater than 0; 
  * the product of all n-1 numbers should be equal to k; 
  * the number of 1-s among all n-1 integers must be minimum possible. 



Let's define f(u,v) as the sum of the numbers on the simple path from node u to node v. Also, let ∑_{i=1}^{n-1} ∑_{j=i+1}^n f(i,j) be a distribution index of the tree.

Find the maximum possible distribution index you can get. Since answer can be too large, print it modulo 10^9 + 7.

In this problem, since the number k can be large, the result of the prime factorization of k is given instead.

Input

The first line contains one integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 100) — the number of test cases.

The first line of each test case contains a single integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 10^5) — the number of nodes in the tree.

Each of the next n-1 lines describes an edge: the i-th line contains two integers u_i and v_i (1 ≤ u_i, v_i ≤ n; u_i ≠ v_i) — indices of vertices connected by the i-th edge.

Next line contains a single integer m (1 ≤ m ≤ 6 ⋅ 10^4) — the number of prime factors of k.

Next line contains m prime numbers p_1, p_2, …, p_m (2 ≤ p_i < 6 ⋅ 10^4) such that k = p_1 ⋅ p_2 ⋅ … ⋅ p_m.

It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 10^5, the sum of m over all test cases doesn't exceed 6 ⋅ 10^4, and the given edges for each test cases form a tree.

Output

Print the maximum distribution index you can get. Since answer can be too large, print it modulo 10^9+7.

Example

Input


3
4
1 2
2 3
3 4
2
2 2
4
3 4
1 3
3 2
2
3 2
7
6 1
2 3
4 6
7 3
5 1
3 6
4
7 5 13 3


Output


17
18
286

Note

In the first test case, one of the optimal ways is on the following image:

<image>

In this case, f(1,2)=1, f(1,3)=3, f(1,4)=5, f(2,3)=2, f(2,4)=4, f(3,4)=2, so the sum of these 6 numbers is 17.

In the second test case, one of the optimal ways is on the following image:

<image>

In this case, f(1,2)=3, f(1,3)=1, f(1,4)=4, f(2,3)=2, f(2,4)=5, f(3,4)=3, so the sum of these 6 numbers is 18.
from __future__ import division, print_function
def main():
    for _ in range(int(input())):
        n = int(input())
        edges = [[] for i in range(n)]
        for i in range(n - 1):
            u, v = map(int, input().split())
            u -= 1; v -= 1;
            edges[u].append(v)
            edges[v].append(u)
        m = int(input())
        factors = list(map(int, input().split()))
        subtree_size = [1] * n
        from collections import deque
        dq = deque()
        dq.append(0)
        visited = {}
        visited[0] = 1
        bfs = []
        parent = {}
        while dq:
            u = dq.popleft()
            for v in edges[u]:
                if v in visited:
                    continue
                bfs.append(v)
                visited[v] = 1
                dq.append(v)
                parent[v] = u 
    
        edge_weights = []
        for v in reversed(bfs):
            if v not in parent:
                continue
            subtree_size[parent[v]] += subtree_size[v]
            edge_weights.append(((n - subtree_size[v]) * subtree_size[v] ))
        
        edge_weights.sort()
        factors.sort()
        temp = 1
        mod = 10 ** 9 + 7
        while len(factors) >= n - 1:
            temp = (temp *  factors.pop()) % mod
        factors.append(temp)
        
        if len(factors) < n - 1:
            factors.extend([1] * (n - 1 - len(factors)))
        factors.sort()

        
        answer = 0
        
        for i in range(n  - 1):
            answer = (answer + factors[i] * edge_weights[i]) % mod
    
        print(answer)


######## Python 2 and 3 footer by Pajenegod and c1729

# Note because cf runs old PyPy3 version which doesn't have the sped up
# unicode strings, PyPy3 strings will many times be slower than pypy2.
# There is a way to get around this by using binary strings in PyPy3
# but its syntax is different which makes it kind of a mess to use.

# So on cf, use PyPy2 for best string performance.

py2 = round(0.5)
if py2:
    from future_builtins import ascii, filter, hex, map, oct, zip
    range = xrange

import os, sys
from io import IOBase, BytesIO

BUFSIZE = 8192
class FastIO(BytesIO):
    newlines = 0

    def __init__(self, file):
        self._file = file
        self._fd = file.fileno()
        self.writable = "x" in file.mode or "w" in file.mode
        self.write = super(FastIO, self).write if self.writable else None

    def _fill(self):
        s = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, BUFSIZE))
        self.seek((self.tell(), self.seek(0,2), super(FastIO, self).write(s))[0])
        return s

    def read(self):
        while self._fill(): pass
        return super(FastIO,self).read()

    def readline(self):
        while self.newlines == 0:
            s = self._fill(); self.newlines = s.count(b"\n") + (not s)
        self.newlines -= 1
        return super(FastIO, self).readline()

    def flush(self):
        if self.writable:
            os.write(self._fd, self.getvalue())
            self.truncate(0), self.seek(0)

class IOWrapper(IOBase):
    def __init__(self, file):
        self.buffer = FastIO(file)
        self.flush = self.buffer.flush
        self.writable = self.buffer.writable
        if py2:
            self.write = self.buffer.write
            self.read = self.buffer.read
            self.readline = self.buffer.readline
        else:
            self.write = lambda s:self.buffer.write(s.encode('ascii'))
            self.read = lambda:self.buffer.read().decode('ascii')
            self.readline = lambda:self.buffer.readline().decode('ascii')


sys.stdin, sys.stdout = IOWrapper(sys.stdin), IOWrapper(sys.stdout)
input = lambda: sys.stdin.readline().rstrip('\r\n')

# Cout implemented in Python
import sys
class ostream:
    def __lshift__(self,a):
        sys.stdout.write(str(a))
        return self
cout = ostream()
endl = '\n'

# Read all remaining integers in stdin, type is given by optional argument, this is fast
def readnumbers(zero = 0):
    conv = ord if py2 else lambda x:x
    A = []; numb = zero; sign = 1; i = 0; s = sys.stdin.buffer.read()
    try:
        while True:
            if s[i] >= b'0' [0]:
                numb = 10 * numb + conv(s[i]) - 48
            elif s[i] == b'-' [0]: sign = -1
            elif s[i] != b'\r' [0]:
                A.append(sign*numb)
                numb = zero; sign = 1
            i += 1
    except:pass
    if s and s[-1] >= b'0' [0]:
        A.append(sign*numb)
    return A

if __name__== "__main__":
  main()