in dickerson v. u.s. the u.s. supreme court held that miranda warnings are
Dickerson v. United States Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000),[1] upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
First Amendment to the United States Constitution In Packingham v. North Carolina (2017), the Supreme Court held that a North Carolina law prohibiting registered sex offenders from accessing various websites impermissibly restricted lawful speech in violation of the First Amendment.[145] The Court held that "a fundamental principle of the First Amendment is that all persons have access to places where they can speak and listen, and then, after reflection, speak and listen once more."[146][147]