그리고 원심이, 원고들이 용도를 입증하지 못한 금 200,604,117원이 피상속인의 재산 정도, 병력 등으로 보아 피상속인의 치료비로 지출된 것이라고 인정하지 않았다 하여 경험칙 위배, 심리미진 등의 위법이 있다 할 수도 없다.
In addition, it cannot be said that there are violations such as empirical rule violations and failure to exhaust all necessary deliberation, etc., even if the lower court did not admit that KRW 200,604,117 of gold, for which the Plaintiffs did not prove their use, were spent as treatment expenses for the heir based on the heir's wealth and medical history.