피고는 '원고의 본소청구가 이유 있다고 하더라도, 2004년 1월분부터 2007년 9월분까지의 접속통화료는 3년의 단기소멸시효가 완성되었다'는 취지로 항변한다.
The Defendant pleads with the purport that "the short-term extinctive prescription of three years for the connection call charges from January 2004 to September 2007 was completed, even if the Plaintiff's claim in the principal lawsuit was with merit."