Question: Does the following movie review have positive or negative in sentiment?

Review: I was going to agree with everyone here who claim HELLWORLD isn't really a HELLRAISER movie but I'm having an internal debate with myself as to what constitutes a HELLRAISER movie ? The original was like Hitchcock on acid with an AIDS allegory . HELLBOUND was a rather plot less runaround but was still reconisably Barker inspired . Since HELL ON EARTH the series shows often cynical flaws of being a franchise with a lack of internal continuity and unimaginative repetitive plots . HELLWORLD continues - and probably concludes - the series <br /><br />The film starts with something Barker couldn't have envisaged 20 years previously - people spending their lives in front of a computer . Somewhat unimaginatively these people are teenagers wearing Cenobite paraphernalia and right away you're reminded of Wes Craven directing a screenplay written by Kevin Williamson , effectively Pinhead Meets SCREAM . To be honest though there's absolutely no reason for Pinhead and Co. to be in the movie since the villain is Lance Henriksen a father who is embittered about the death of his son <br /><br />There's all the symbols , iconography , plotting and situations common in all teen slasher films . There's also a couple of nods to SAW which like HELLRAISER started off as a well regarded horror film then became a franchise factory churning out sequels to lower acclaim and box office . HELLWORLD isn't a terrible horror film in its own right but there's a seen it all before feel and people who have enjoyed most of the sequels will certainly feel cheated that they're watching something that could be any type of horror film

Answer: The sentiment of the above review is