Question: Does the following movie review have positive or negative in sentiment?

Review: The film opens with this hot chick stripping down completely nude and starting to take a bath. I thought, "Oh boy, here we go." A few seconds later she hears something outside. She says, "Who's there?" and runs outside the room (scantily clad, mind you) to see who it is.<br /><br />She's chased outside by a homicidal maniac and runs through the woods, her robe falling off and revealing more pointless nudity. Finally she lures the monster into a circle of gunfire from a SWAT team who finally manage to kill Jason (apparently repetitive gunshots make him implode on impact).<br /><br />Then this balding man pats the half-naked girl -- who is now revealed to be a brainy cop -- on the back and says something like, "Good work, Sergeant, we'll get a promotion for you!" Meanwhile she's standing around naked with only a robe.<br /><br />For a moment I thought to myself, "This is either going to be the worst movie ever made, or a clever parody of its predecessors." I mean, either the whole nudity part with the female cop was just there for the sake of nudity, or it was a parody of the fact that every "Friday the 13th" movie has at least one scene of gratuitous female flesh.<br /><br />Unfortunately my first assumption was correct. This is an awful movie. It only gets worse and worse as time goes on. It's entertaining, sure, in a so-bad-it's-hilarious kind of way. The characters are all clichéd to the point of nausea and the killing scenes are so standard it's like doing a paint-by-numbers, it's already mapped out for you ahead of time.<br /><br />This isn't the worst film ever but it's certainly a very bad, cheesy, poorly acted, amateurish title in the "Jason" series and the fact that it was indeed NOT the last "Friday the 13th" film is rather ironic in itself.

Answer: The sentiment of the above review is