While the judicial proponents of freedom continue to hold the upper hand on free speech, the reigning approach to freedom of religion underscores the even-handedness of the law-the same rules should apply to religious and nonreligious alike. In 1990, in Oregon v.
The judicial proponents of freedom hold the upper hand on free speech while freedom of religion underscores the even-handedness of the law. Religious and nonreligious rules should be equal.