Is NOBODY wrong in the post ? POST : So my friend and I are both college debaters. This summer, we're setting up a debate camp for high schoolers to improve their skills. We agreed not to do this for money, but because we genuinely love debating. Today, we had a disagreement about who we should let in.

He thinks we should let everyone who wants to in. I think this a bad idea. We've set our fees at a pretty low rate anyways, so if we let anyone in, we'd get *lots* of kids- since there are no other debate camps in the area.

I suggested the opposite: only allow people with a certain levels of wins/points. This would do two things: 1) keep the numbers low-ish, so we wouldn't have a lot of people and ultimately chaos 2) it would ensure we're actually getting talented debaters. 

My partner took offense to this and said he wants the camp to be for everybody. I don't see it that way. Our camp is designed to improve the skills of already good debaters to get to the next level, not teach mediocre debaters. I know with practice a mediocre debater can be a good debater, but I'd rather spend my summer watching a good debater become great rather than a bad or mediocre debater become kinda good. 

Am I in the wrong here?