Is OTHER wrong in the post ? POST : My wife is in her third trimester, and we have already decided the baby will have a middle name that has been in my family for generations as well as my last name. In the beginning, we decided that my wife would have full agency over the first name since so much of the baby's name is already "mine." However, we also agreed that I would have final veto power. 

My wife has decided that she wants to name my future child after her childhood dog, who passed away a decade ago. It is not a super "dog" name, like Biscuit or Fido or something. However it still sounds like a dog name, think Lucy or Bella or something. I said I am not letting my kid be named after a dog, for heaven's sake, and she got really upset and said that it doesn't matter because I've never even met her childhood dog, so why would I even associate that name with a dog? She said she named her dog that as a kid because it was a name she always really liked. She also said that dog was her best friend growing up, while I've never even met the originator of our child's middle name. 

Now she is really mad and she says she doesn't want the kid to have some dead person's middle name. She says I'm being selfish because 2/3 of the baby's name is already mine. AITA?