father did so here'. No putative father had standing here.' Under section 63:089, “[a]n unmarried biological father does not have standing to seek relief from a judgment terminating parental rights if the mother did not identify him to the adoption entity before the date she signed a consent for adoption 'or if he was not located because the mother failed or refused to provide sufficient information to locate him.” § 63.089, Fla. Stat. (2015); see also id. § 63.022 (providing that unmarried biological father’s interests “acquire[ ] constitutional protection only when he detoon-strates a timely and full commitment to the responsibilities - of parenthood, both during the pregnancy and after the child’s birth”); Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248, 261, 103 S.Ct. 2985, 77 L.Ed.2d 614 (1983) (<HOLDING>). Even assuming, without deciding, that the 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing the existence of the special relationship (B) holding that plaintiff cannot be the only link between the defendant and the forum (C) holding that mere reference to a collective bargaining agreement does not confer federal question jurisdiction under section 301a (D) recognizing that the mere existence of a biological link does not confer legal rights without the fathers full commitment to the responsibilities of parenthood (E) holding that the mere delivery of documents  does not confer jurisdiction
(D)