retail installment sales contract for eight vehicles nonexecutory where debtor’s only obligation was payment and creditor’s only obligation concerned limited repair warranty); Riggs Nat. Bank of Wash, D.C. v. Perry (In re Perry), 25 B.R. 817, 819-20 (Bankr.D.Md.1982) (finding installment sales contracts for vehicles not executory within meaning of § 365); Brock v. Am. Sec. Bank (In re Brock), 23 B.R. 998, 1002 n. 8 (Bankr.D.D.C.1982) (noting, without deciding, that installment sales contract for vehicle purchase “would not ordinarily be deemed an executory contract simply because the sole and remaining obligation under the contract is that of the debtor to maintain periodic contractual payments called for in the contract itself’); In re Whatley, 16 B.R. 394, 398 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1982) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we affirm the nonexe-cutory 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that a lien cannot be estopped into existence where the borrowers promised to execute a lien in the manner mandated by the constitution and then failed to do so (B) holding the beginning of a creditors action to subject an equitable estate to the payment of a judgment gives a specific lien upon the property which it is sought to reach and this lien continues while the cause is pending (C) holding that the lien bond releases the property from the lien but the lien is then secured by the bond (D) holding that insurance obligation was primary to indemnity obligation (E) holding creditors obligation to cancel lien not sufficient to make the contract execute ry
(E)