or techniques used in the interviews. He also pointed out that Crappa’s certainty in her testimony waned between the February 15 interview and a March 12 conversation with an investigator, explaining that hypnotically-induced suggestions must be reinforced with some frequency to last. This phenomenon explained Crap-pa’s amnesia at Alcala’s second trial. B. Error “The right of an accused in a criminal trial to due process is, in essence, the right to a fair opportunity to defend against the State’s accusations. The right[ ] ... to call witnesses in one’s own behalf ha[s] long been recognized as essential to due process.” Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 294, 93 S.Ct. 1038, 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973); see also Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 690, 106 S.Ct. 2142, 90 L.Ed.2d 636 (1986) (<HOLDING>); Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14, 19, 87 
 Holding statements: (A) recognizing that the essential requisites of procedural due process are notice and meaningful opportunity to be heard (B) holding that procedural due process requires adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard (C) holding that a party against whom a motion for summary judgment is filed is entitled to notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard (D) holding that a predeprivation opportunity to be heard satisfies the due process clause (E) holding that an essential component of procedural fairness is an opportunity to be heard
(E)