Comment: I appreciate the save the best for last, but  to most the dividend increase is the important info in the article and should have been in the title or leading words. 
talking about a 0.8 decrease as a "slump" is a bit extreme.   It seems the author is trying to make Bell out to be a tanking company when in fact the exchange rate alone would have been enough to cause the slight downside in profits.  Keep the dividends coming!