I mean it kinda did, because it said some have *more* women than men, and showed fields in which there were still more men than women, so it seemed absurd.    That being said, a 46% women-to-men ratio amongst biologists? Sounds about as equal you can get without using USSR methods of distributing edication and jobs.    Edit: To clarify, it still doesn't show any male dominance as the OP suggested, but it was edited in such a way that it presented a literal lie.