Comment: A firm justification for laws limiting the freedom of citizens is the protection of others who might be adversely affected.  In the case of alcohol, there is a potential danger of drunken driving and other acts committed under the influence.  Good laws do not limit individual freedom unless it significantly advances the safety or rights of the general population.  In the present instance, the purchase and use of cigarettes by the younger population does not significantly impact the safety or rights of the general population.  Therefore this restriction on freedom does not conform to good democratic practice.  The dangers of second hand smoke are addressed by other laws prohibiting smoking in various places.  This law represents only the limitation of individual freedom because of the opinions and preferences of others.  In a free society, limitations on freedom should be avoided except when absolutely necessary.