> Regardless of the truth in the accusations against him, he knew that his nomination will tarnish that respect.    Hold up. So is the argument basically "since what we accused him of is so bad, it doesn't matter that there wasn't any evidence"?    Well then in that case, I'd like to go ahead and say that whoever the democrats nominate for president in the 2020 election molested me when I was a child. Regardless of the truth of this accusation against them, they should know that their election will tarnish the respect for that office, and concede.