Comment: I posted the same comment on the Broomfield fracking mess, applies here also 

What is the continually last century type argument stating that research must prove harm before we act? How about we study the area get baseline readings and any changes due to industry are required to be rectified, air, water, sound etc. Why are we experimenting on our families and neighbors? Should we have people drink extreme amounts of molybdenum and find out 40 years later it harmed them? Why? Its cruel and ignorant.