I'm sure.  I am also certain the most recent Supreme Court decision yesterday, invalidating the most recent efforts of the EPA to deal with carbon emissions, is a probably a bad idea - legally and public health wise.  I likely is going to be bad for my daughter's asthma, may put the drinking water in Springfield at risk, and have other unforeseen adverse consequences.  Hopefully diversity of opinion still has a place in our governance and in our label bound, talking point weighted media... as I would hazard to say that there are ways that "rights" under the constitution can also support what are generally considered to be 'liberal' causes as well as a wide range of differing political views.  Thanks for you comment.