Opinion by
Oliver, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lenses for photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, the merchandise in question is dutiable as photographic lenses, the claim of the plaintiff at 25 percent was sustained.