Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel articles embroidered and trimmed with laces similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), filet laces the same as those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and Normandy laces like those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.