John Keating (judge)
John Keating (c. 1630–1691) was an Irish judge  of the late seventeenth century,  who held office as  Chief Justice of the Irish Common Pleas. He had an impressive  reputation for integrity, impartiality and benevolence, but  due to his loyalty to King  James II  of England he was dismissed from his office of Chief Justice after the Revolution of 1688, and later, facing the threat of impeachment,  committed suicide.

Family and early career 
He was born in Dublin, the second son of Edmund Keating and Elizabeth (or Eleanor)  Eustace, daughter of John Fitzwilliam Eustace  of Harristown, County Kildare, and  sister of Sir Maurice Eustace, later Lord Chancellor of Ireland. Keating, like his uncle Maurice, combined his membership of the Church of Ireland with a notable tolerance in religious matters, which led to claims in later life that he was  himself secretly a crypto-Catholic. The Keating family lived as permanent guests of Eustace on his Palmerstown estate, which he bought around 1647.

Keating graduated from the University of Dublin in 1655 and entered Lincoln's Inn in 1657: it was said that his knowledge of the law was deficient compared to that of his fellow students. In 1661 he returned to Ireland and became Deputy Clerk to the Irish House of Commons. This job involved a great deal of travel between Dublin and London, and Keating displayed impressive energy in performing his duties, on one occasion completing the return journey in twelve days in the depth of winter.

He entered the  King's Inns in 1663 and, despite earlier criticism of his deficiencies in legal knowledge, he  quickly gained a reputation as a gifted barrister. His uncle 
the Lord Chancellor recommended him  as a candidate for judicial office to James Butler, 1st Duke of Ormonde, the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, whose friendship was then the  usual path to the Bench. Keating was content for the time being with the minor position of Attorney General to the Duke of York; he admitted that he could not afford financially to give up his practice at the Irish Bar,  and  said in addition  that he did not wish to arouse the envy of  his older colleagues.

In 1675 he was raised to the Bench as  Chief Judge (or Seneschal)  of the Palatine court of Tipperary,  a position which was  generally regarded as  a sinecure rather than a major  judicial office (although  for at least part of its history  the  Court's workload was  heavy enough to require the appointment of a second judge, called the  Master of the Rolls).

Chief Justice 
Given Keating's previous reluctance to accept a seat on the High Court  Bench, his appointment as Chief Justice of the Common Pleas in 1679, with no  judicial experience other  than as the palatine judge in Tipperary, may seem surprising. Even more surprising was the choice of a judge who was widely  suspected of Roman Catholic leanings, since  the anti-Catholic hysteria engendered by the Popish Plot was at its height, and it was rumoured that Keating himself might be accused of complicity in the Plot. It is very likely, as Elrington Ball suggests, that  Charles II chose Keating precisely because his well-known tolerance in matters of religion meant that he was unlikely to succumb to the prevailing anti-Catholic  mood. In particular, he was expected to quash an unfounded charge of treason against Richard Power, 1st Earl of Tyrone and duly did so. In the following years he gained an impressive reputation
for integrity, impartiality and mercy, and as a result he  made political enemies on all sides. He was offered the office of Lord Chief Justice of Ireland in 1681, but declined it.

His reputation for mercy did not extend to  those  charged with cattle theft, which was regarded  as  a serious social evil  at the time: in such cases he was prepared to drive hard for a conviction. In the leading case of R. v Cavenagh in 1689, he broke with  all precedent in refusing to allow two convicted cattle thieves to plead benefit of clergy for a first offence.  Both were hanged.

Dismissal and death 
During the politically turbulent years 1688–1691, Keating was in a particularly difficult position since unlike most  of his colleagues he was very anxious to retain office. During James II's first year in Ireland, Keating showed himself to be  a staunch loyalist, praying publicly for the King and referring to the Glorious Revolution as an "invasion".  James was seemingly impressed, and Keating was given a prominent place in the opening of the Patriot Parliament of 1689; yet within days his enemies had him dismissed from the Privy Council of Ireland.

The collapse of the Jacobite in the following year  cause placed Keating in an impossible position. He could not seriously have expected to be allowed to keep his  office, yet he undoubtedly made friendly advances to the new administration. These advances  met with a cold reception: Keating was dismissed from office, imprisoned for a time and apparently threatened with impeachment. He committed suicide early in 1691, but was permitted a Christian burial in Palmerstown  churchyard, where his wife and parents are also buried.

Marriage 
In 1659 he married Grace Holte, daughter of the prominent landowner and   Royalist Sir Thomas Holte of Aston Hall by his first wife Grace Bradbourne,  and widow of Sir Richard Shuckburgh. Grace died in 1677; Keating erected a memorial to her in Palmerstown Chapel, Dublin, paying eloquent testimony to their happy marriage.

There were no children  of this marriage (Grace was much older than her husband), but she  had two children by her first marriage: Sir John Shuckburgh (1635–1661), first of the Shuckburgh Baronets, and Grace, who married firstly Sir John Bernard, 2nd Baronet, and secondly Thomas  Mariet.

Character and reputation 
Historians on the whole have dealt kindly with Keating both as a man and as a judge. The more critical among them, like Elrington Ball,  have accused him of clinging to office in an undignified manner, and the Cavenagh case   shows that he could be ruthless enough when he thought there was  a danger of a serious felon escaping justice. Yet there is impressive evidence of his good qualities. Duhigg, in a celebrated passage, called him: "the great ornament of the Irish Bench...a great magistrate who in a slippery or stormy period exercised official station with mild manners and untainted integrity. This great man was calm, patient and humane in the trial of prisoners; clear, laborious and consistent in the discussion of civil suits; faithful to his King and country in the indulgence of political principles; and attached to God in the exercise of Christianity."