TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods
Stephanie Lin
University of Oxford
sylin07@gmail.comJacob Hilton
OpenAI

TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods
We propose a benchmark to measure whether a language model is truthful in
generating answers to questions. The benchmark comprises 817 questions that
span 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics. We crafted
questions that some humans would answer falsely due to a false belief or
misconception. To perform well, models must avoid generating false answers
learned from imitating human texts. We tested GPT-3, GPT-Neo/J, GPT-2 and a
T5-based model. The best model was truthful on 58% of questions, while human
performance was 94%. Models generated many false answers that mimic popular
misconceptions and have the potential to deceive humans. The largest models
were generally the least truthful. This contrasts with other NLP tasks, where
performance improves with model size. However, this result is expected if false
answers are learned from the training distribution. We suggest that scaling up
models alone is less promising for improving truthfulness than fine-tuning
using training objectives other than imitation of text from the web.
Stephanie Lin Jacob Hilton Owain Evans