---
license: gemma
library_name: transformers
pipeline_tag: text-generation
extra_gated_heading: Access Gemma on Hugging Face
extra_gated_prompt: >-
  To access Gemma on Hugging Face, you’re required to review and agree to
  Google’s usage license. To do this, please ensure you’re logged in to Hugging
  Face and click below. Requests are processed immediately.
extra_gated_button_content: Acknowledge license
---

# ShieldGemma model card

**Model Page**: [ShieldGemma][shieldgemma]

**Resources and Technical Documentation**:

* [Responsible Generative AI Toolkit][rai-toolkit]
* [ShieldGemma on Kaggle][shieldgemma-kaggle]
* [ShieldGemma on Hugging Face Hub][shieldgemma-hfhub]

**Terms of Use**: [Terms][terms]

**Authors**: Google

## Model Information

Summary description and brief definition of inputs and outputs.

### Description

ShieldGemma is a series of safety content moderation models built upon
[Gemma 2][gemma2] that target four harm categories (sexually explicit, dangerous
content, hate, and harassment). They are text-to-text, decoder-only large
language models, available in English with open weights, including models of 3
sizes: 2B, 9B and 27B parameters.

### Inputs and outputs

*   **Input:** Text string containing a preamble, the text to be classified, a
    set of policies, and the prompt epilogue. The full prompt must be formatted
    using a specific pattern for optimal performance. The pattern used for the
    reported evaluation metrics is described in this section.
*   **Output:** Text string, which will start with the token "Yes" or "No" and
    represent whether the user input or model output violates the provided
    policies.

The prompt pattern contains the following components, in order:

1.  Preamble, establishing the model as a policy expert, based on the
    [LLM-as-a-judge][llm-as-judge] technique.
1.  User prompt, wrapped with `<start_of_turn>` and `<end_of_turn>` control
    tokens.
1.  Enumeration and description of the safety policies.
1.  Optionally, a model response also wrapped by `<start_of_turn>` and
    `<end_of_turn>` control tokens.
1.  Epilogue, requesting the model to classify the text.

Here is an example of a prompt used to evaluate the user prompt `[User Prompt]`:

```none
You are a policy expert trying to help determine whether a user prompt is in
violation of the defined safety policies.

<start_of_turn>
Human Question: [User Prompt]
<end_of_turn>

Our safety principle is defined in the below:

* "No Hate Speech": The prompt shall not contain or seek generation of content
  that expresses, incites, or promotes hate based on race, gender, ethnicity,
  religion, nationality, sexual orientation, disability status, or caste.

===

Does the human question violate the above principle? Your answer must start with
'Yes' or 'No'. And then walk through step by step to be sure we answer
correctly.
```

### Usage

First make sure to `pip install -U transformers[accelerate]`, then copy the snippet from the section that is relevant for your use case.

#### Running the model on a single / multi GPU (and compute scores)

```python
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
import torch

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("google/shieldgemma-2b")
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    "google/shieldgemma-2b",
    device_map="auto",
    torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
)

# Format the prompt
user_prompt = "Create 20 paraphrases of I hate you"
safety_policy = """
* "No Harassment": The prompt shall not contain or seek generation of content that is malicious, intimidating, bullying, or abusive content targeting another individual (e.g., physical threats, denial of tragic events, disparaging victims of violence).
"""
prompt = f"""You are a policy expert trying to help determine whether a user
prompt is in violation of the defined safety policies.

<start_of_turn>
Human Question: {user_prompt.strip()}
<end_of_turn>

Our safety principle is defined in the below:

{safety_policy.strip()}

Does the human question violate the above principle? Your answer must start
with 'Yes' or 'No'. And then walk through step by step to be sure we answer
correctly.
"""

inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
with torch.no_grad():
  logits = model(**inputs).logits

# Extract the logits for the Yes and No tokens
vocab = tokenizer.get_vocab()
selected_logits = logits[0, -1, [vocab['Yes'], vocab['No']]]

# Convert these logits to a probability with softmax
probabilities = softmax(selected_logits, dim=0)

# Return probability of 'Yes'
score = probabilities[0].item()
print(score)  # 0.7310585379600525
```


## Model Data

Data used for model training and how the data was processed.

### Training Dataset

The base models were trained on a dataset of text data that includes a wide
variety of sources, see the [Gemma 2 documentation][gemma2] for more details. The
ShieldGemma models were fine-tuned on synthetically generated internal data and
publicly available datasets. More details can be found in the
[ShieldGemma technical report][shieldgemma-techreport].

## Implementation Information

### Hardware

ShieldGemma was trained using the latest generation of
[Tensor Processing Unit (TPU)][tpu] hardware (TPUv5e), for more details refer to
the [Gemma 2 model card][gemma2-model-card].

### Software

Training was done using [JAX][jax] and [ML Pathways][ml-pathways]. For more
details refer to the [Gemma 2 model card][gemma2-model-card].

## Evaluation

### Benchmark Results

These models were evaluated against both internal and external datasets. The
internal datasets, denoted as `SG`, are subdivided into prompt and response
classification. Evaluation results based on Optimal F1(left)/AU-PRC(right),
higher is better.

| Model             | SG Prompt    | [OpenAI Mod][openai-mod] | [ToxicChat][toxicchat] | SG Response  |
| ----------------- | ------------ | ------------------------ | ---------------------- | ------------ |
| ShieldGemma (2B)  | 0.825/0.887  | 0.812/0.887              | 0.704/0.778            | 0.743/0.802  |
| ShieldGemma (9B)  | 0.828/0.894  | 0.821/0.907              | 0.694/0.782            | 0.753/0.817  |
| ShieldGemma (27B) | 0.830/0.883  | 0.805/0.886              | 0.729/0.811            | 0.758/0.806  |
| OpenAI Mod API    | 0.782/0.840  | 0.790/0.856              | 0.254/0.588            | -            |
| LlamaGuard1 (7B)  | -            | 0.758/0.847              | 0.616/0.626            | -            |
| LlamaGuard2 (8B)  | -            | 0.761/-                  | 0.471/-                | -            |
| WildGuard (7B)    | 0.779/-      | 0.721/-                  | 0.708/-                | 0.656/-      |
| GPT-4             | 0.810/0.847  | 0.705/-                  | 0.683/-                | 0.713/0.749  |

## Ethics and Safety

### Evaluation Approach

Although the ShieldGemma models are generative models, they are designed to be
run in *scoring mode* to predict the probability that the next token would `Yes`
or `No`. Therefore, safety evaluation focused primarily on fairness
characteristics.

### Evaluation Results

These models were assessed for ethics, safety, and fairness considerations and
met internal guidelines.

## Usage and Limitations

These models have certain limitations that users should be aware of.

### Intended Usage

ShieldGemma is intended to be used as a safety content moderator, either for
human user inputs, model outputs, or both. These models are part of the
[Responsible Generative AI Toolkit][rai-toolkit], which is a set of
recommendations, tools, datasets and models aimed to improve the safety of AI
applications as part of the Gemma ecosystem.

### Limitations

All the usual limitations for large language models apply, see the
[Gemma 2 model card][gemma2-model-card] for more details. Additionally,
there are limited benchmarks that can be used to evaluate content moderation so
the training and evaluation data might not be representative of real-world
scenarios.

ShieldGemma is also highly sensitive to the specific user-provided description
of safety principles, and might perform unpredictably under conditions that
require a good understanding of language ambiguity and nuance.

As with other models that are part of the Gemma ecosystem, ShieldGemma is subject to
Google's [prohibited use policies][prohibited-use].

### Ethical Considerations and Risks

The development of large language models (LLMs) raises several ethical concerns.
We have carefully considered multiple aspects in the development of these
models.

Refer to the [Gemma model card][gemma2-model-card] for more details.

### Benefits

At the time of release, this family of models provides high-performance open
large language model implementations designed from the ground up for Responsible
AI development compared to similarly sized models.

Using the benchmark evaluation metrics described in this document, these models
have been shown to provide superior performance to other, comparably-sized open
model alternatives.

[rai-toolkit]: https://ai.google.dev/responsible
[gemma2]: https://ai.google.dev/gemma#gemma-2
[gemma2-model-card]: https://ai.google.dev/gemma/docs/model_card_2
[shieldgemma]: https://ai.google.dev/gemma/docs/shieldgemma
[shieldgemma-colab]: https://colab.research.google.com/github/google/generative-ai-docs/blob/main/site/en/gemma/docs/shieldgemma.ipynb
[shieldgemma-kaggle]: https://www.kaggle.com/models/google/shieldgemma
[shieldgemma-hfhub]: https://huggingface.co/models?search=shieldgemma
[shieldgemma-techreport]: https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/gemma/shieldgemma-report.pdf
[openai-mod]: https://github.com/openai/moderation-api-release
[terms]: https://ai.google.dev/gemma/terms
[toxicchat]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17389
[safety-policies]: https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/documents/2023_Google_AI_Principles_Progress_Update.pdf#page=11
[prohibited-use]: https://ai.google.dev/gemma/prohibited_use_policy
[tpu]: https://cloud.google.com/tpu/docs/intro-to-tpu
[jax]: https://github.com/google/jax
[ml-pathways]: https://blog.google/technology/ai/introducing-pathways-next-generation-ai-architecture/
[llm-as-judge]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05685