File size: 3,059 Bytes
52ec00b 4207411 52ec00b 4207411 7b7de30 4207411 7b7de30 4207411 7b7de30 4207411 7b7de30 4207411 a4d3cfe 4207411 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 |
---
license: apache-2.0
language:
- en
tags:
- Pytorch
- mmsegmentation
- segmentation
- Crop Classification
- Multi Temporal
- Geospatial
- Foundation model
datasets:
- ibm-nasa-geospatial/hls_burn_scars
metrics:
- accuracy
- IoU
---
### Model and Inputs
The pretrained [Prithvi-100m](https://huggingface.co/ibm-nasa-geospatial/Prithvi-100M/blob/main/README.md) parameter model is finetuned to classify crop and other land cover types based off HLS data and CDL labels from the [multi_temporal_crop_classification dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/ibm-nasa-geospatial/multi-temporal-crop-classification).
This dataset includes input chips of 224x224x18, where 224 is the height and width and 18 is combined with 6 bands of 3 time-steps. The bands are:
1. Blue
2. Green
3. Red
4. Narrow NIR
5. SWIR 1
6. SWIR 2
Labels are from CDL(Crop Data Layer) and classified into 13 classes.
The Prithvi-100m model was initially pretrained using a sequence length of 3 timesteps. For this task, we leverage the capacity for multi-temporal data input, which has been integrated from the foundational pretrained model. This adaptation allows us to achieve more generalized finetuning outcomes.
### Code
Code for Finetuning is available through [github](https://github.com/NASA-IMPACT/hls-foundation-os/tree/main/fine-tuning-examples)
Configuration used for finetuning is available through [config](https://github.com/NASA-IMPACT/hls-foundation-os/blob/main/fine-tuning-examples/configs/multi_temporal_crop_classification.py).
### Results
The experiment by running the mmseg stack for 80 epochs using the above config led to the following result:
| **Classes** | **IoU**| **Acc**|
|:------------------:|:------:|:------:|
| Natural Vegetation | 0.3362 | 39.06% |
| Forest | 0.4362 | 65.88% |
| Corn | 0.4574 | 54.53% |
| Soybeans | 0.4682 | 62.25% |
| Wetlands | 0.3246 | 45.62% |
| Developed/Barren | 0.3077 | 49.1% |
| Open Water | 0.6181 | 90.04% |
| Winter Wheat | 0.4497 | 66.75% |
| Alfalfa | 0.2518 | 63.97% |
|Fallow/Idle Cropland| 0.328 | 54.46% |
| Cotton | 0.2679 | 66.37% |
| Sorghum | 0.2741 | 75.91% |
| Other | 0.2803 | 39.76% |
|**aAcc**|**mIoU**|**mAcc**|
|:------:|:------:|:------:|
| 54.32% | 0.3692 | 59.51% |
It is important to acknowledge that the CDL (Crop Data Layer) labels employed in this process are known to contain noise and are not entirely precise, thereby influencing the model's performance. Fine-tuning the model with more accurate labels is expected to further enhance its overall effectiveness, leading to improved results.
### Inference and demo
There is an inference script that allows to run the hls-cdl crop classification model for inference on HLS images. These input have to be geotiff format, including 18 bands for 3 time-step, and each time-step includes the channels described above (Blue, Green, Red, Narrow NIR, SWIR, SWIR 2) in order.
|