---
base_model: sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics:
- cosine_accuracy@1
- cosine_accuracy@3
- cosine_accuracy@5
- cosine_accuracy@10
- cosine_precision@1
- cosine_precision@3
- cosine_precision@5
- cosine_precision@10
- cosine_recall@1
- cosine_recall@3
- cosine_recall@5
- cosine_recall@10
- cosine_ndcg@10
- cosine_mrr@10
- cosine_map@100
- dot_accuracy@1
- dot_accuracy@3
- dot_accuracy@5
- dot_accuracy@10
- dot_precision@1
- dot_precision@3
- dot_precision@5
- dot_precision@10
- dot_recall@1
- dot_recall@3
- dot_recall@5
- dot_recall@10
- dot_ndcg@10
- dot_mrr@10
- dot_map@100
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
tags:
- sentence-transformers
- sentence-similarity
- feature-extraction
- generated_from_trainer
- dataset_size:714
- loss:MatryoshkaLoss
- loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
widget:
- source_sentence: What does the term 'rights, opportunities, or access' encompass
in this framework?
sentences:
- "10 \nGAI systems can ease the unintentional production or dissemination of false,\
\ inaccurate, or misleading \ncontent (misinformation) at scale, particularly\
\ if the content stems from confabulations. \nGAI systems can also ease the deliberate\
\ production or dissemination of false or misleading information \n(disinformation)\
\ at scale, where an actor has the explicit intent to deceive or cause harm to\
\ others. Even \nvery subtle changes to text or images can manipulate human and\
\ machine perception. \nSimilarly, GAI systems could enable a higher degree of\
\ sophistication for malicious actors to produce \ndisinformation that is targeted\
\ towards specific demographics. Current and emerging multimodal models \nmake\
\ it possible to generate both text-based disinformation and highly realistic\
\ “deepfakes” – that is, \nsynthetic audiovisual content and photorealistic images.12\
\ Additional disinformation threats could be \nenabled by future GAI models trained\
\ on new data modalities."
- '74. See, e.g., Heather Morrison. Virtual Testing Puts Disabled Students at a
Disadvantage. Government
Technology. May 24, 2022.
https://www.govtech.com/education/k-12/virtual-testing-puts-disabled-students-at-a-disadvantage;
Lydia X. Z. Brown, Ridhi Shetty, Matt Scherer, and Andrew Crawford. Ableism And
Disability
Discrimination In New Surveillance Technologies: How new surveillance technologies
in education,
policing, health care, and the workplace disproportionately harm disabled people.
Center for Democracy
and Technology Report. May 24, 2022.
https://cdt.org/insights/ableism-and-disability-discrimination-in-new-surveillance-technologies-how
new-surveillance-technologies-in-education-policing-health-care-and-the-workplace
disproportionately-harm-disabled-people/
69'
- "persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other persons of color; members\
\ of religious minorities; \nwomen, girls, and non-binary people; lesbian, gay,\
\ bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) \npersons; older adults;\
\ persons with disabilities; persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise\
\ adversely \naffected by persistent poverty or inequality. \nRIGHTS, OPPORTUNITIES,\
\ OR ACCESS: “Rights, opportunities, or access” is used to indicate the scoping\
\ \nof this framework. It describes the set of: civil rights, civil liberties,\
\ and privacy, including freedom of speech, \nvoting, and protections from discrimination,\
\ excessive punishment, unlawful surveillance, and violations of \nprivacy and\
\ other freedoms in both public and private sector contexts; equal opportunities,\
\ including equitable \naccess to education, housing, credit, employment, and\
\ other programs; or, access to critical resources or"
- source_sentence: What are some broad negative risks associated with GAI design,
development, and deployment?
sentences:
- "actually occurring, or large-scale risks could occur); and broad GAI negative\
\ risks, \nincluding: Immature safety or risk cultures related to AI and GAI design,\
\ \ndevelopment and deployment, public information integrity risks, including\
\ impacts \non democratic processes, unknown long-term performance characteristics\
\ of GAI. \nInformation Integrity; Dangerous, \nViolent, or Hateful Content; CBRN\
\ \nInformation or Capabilities \nGV-1.3-007 Devise a plan to halt development\
\ or deployment of a GAI system that poses \nunacceptable negative risk. \nCBRN\
\ Information and Capability; \nInformation Security; Information \nIntegrity\
\ \nAI Actor Tasks: Governance and Oversight \n \nGOVERN 1.4: The risk management\
\ process and its outcomes are established through transparent policies, procedures,\
\ and other \ncontrols based on organizational risk priorities. \nAction ID \n\
Suggested Action \nGAI Risks \nGV-1.4-001 \nEstablish policies and mechanisms\
\ to prevent GAI systems from generating"
- "39 \nMS-3.3-004 \nProvide input for training materials about the capabilities\
\ and limitations of GAI \nsystems related to digital content transparency for\
\ AI Actors, other \nprofessionals, and the public about the societal impacts\
\ of AI and the role of \ndiverse and inclusive content generation. \nHuman-AI\
\ Configuration; \nInformation Integrity; Harmful Bias \nand Homogenization \n\
MS-3.3-005 \nRecord and integrate structured feedback about content provenance\
\ from \noperators, users, and potentially impacted communities through the use\
\ of \nmethods such as user research studies, focus groups, or community forums.\
\ \nActively seek feedback on generated content quality and potential biases.\
\ \nAssess the general awareness among end users and impacted communities \nabout\
\ the availability of these feedback channels. \nHuman-AI Configuration; \nInformation\
\ Integrity; Harmful Bias \nand Homogenization \nAI Actor Tasks: AI Deployment,\
\ Affected Individuals and Communities, End-Users, Operation and Monitoring, TEVV"
- "NOTICE & \nEXPLANATION \nWHY THIS PRINCIPLE IS IMPORTANT\nThis section provides\
\ a brief summary of the problems which the principle seeks to address and protect\
\ \nagainst, including illustrative examples. \nAutomated systems now determine\
\ opportunities, from employment to credit, and directly shape the American \n\
public’s experiences, from the courtroom to online classrooms, in ways that profoundly\
\ impact people’s lives. But this \nexpansive impact is not always visible. An\
\ applicant might not know whether a person rejected their resume or a \nhiring\
\ algorithm moved them to the bottom of the list. A defendant in the courtroom\
\ might not know if a judge deny\ning their bail is informed by an automated\
\ system that labeled them “high risk.” From correcting errors to contesting \n\
decisions, people are often denied the knowledge they need to address the impact\
\ of automated systems on their lives."
- source_sentence: Who should conduct the assessment of the impact of surveillance
on rights and opportunities?
sentences:
- "APPENDIX\n•\nJulia Simon-Mishel, Supervising Attorney, Philadelphia Legal Assistance\n\
•\nDr. Zachary Mahafza, Research & Data Analyst, Southern Poverty Law Center\n\
•\nJ. Khadijah Abdurahman, Tech Impact Network Research Fellow, AI Now Institute,\
\ UCLA C2I1, and\nUWA Law School\nPanelists separately described the increasing\
\ scope of technology use in providing for social welfare, including \nin fraud\
\ detection, digital ID systems, and other methods focused on improving efficiency\
\ and reducing cost. \nHowever, various panelists individually cautioned that\
\ these systems may reduce burden for government \nagencies by increasing the\
\ burden and agency of people using and interacting with these technologies. \n\
Additionally, these systems can produce feedback loops and compounded harm, collecting\
\ data from \ncommunities and using it to reinforce inequality. Various panelists\
\ suggested that these harms could be"
- "assessments, including data retention timelines and associated justification,\
\ and an assessment of the \nimpact of surveillance or data collection on rights,\
\ opportunities, and access. Where possible, this \nassessment of the impact of\
\ surveillance should be done by an independent party. Reporting should be \n\
provided in a clear and machine-readable manner. \n35"
- "access to education, housing, credit, employment, and other programs; or, access\
\ to critical resources or \nservices, such as healthcare, financial services,\
\ safety, social services, non-deceptive information about goods \nand services,\
\ and government benefits. \n10"
- source_sentence: How can voting-related systems impact privacy and security?
sentences:
- "as custody and divorce information, and home, work, or school environmental data);\
\ or have the reasonable potential \nto be used in ways that are likely to expose\
\ individuals to meaningful harm, such as a loss of privacy or financial harm\
\ \ndue to identity theft. Data and metadata generated by or about those who are\
\ not yet legal adults is also sensitive, even \nif not related to a sensitive\
\ domain. Such data includes, but is not limited to, numerical, text, image, audio,\
\ or video \ndata. “Sensitive domains” are those in which activities being conducted\
\ can cause material harms, including signifi\ncant adverse effects on human\
\ rights such as autonomy and dignity, as well as civil liberties and civil rights.\
\ Domains \nthat have historically been singled out as deserving of enhanced data\
\ protections or where such enhanced protections \nare reasonably expected by\
\ the public include, but are not limited to, health, family planning and care,\
\ employment,"
- "agreed upon the importance of advisory boards and compensated community input\
\ early in the design process \n(before the technology is built and instituted).\
\ Various panelists also emphasized the importance of regulation \nthat includes\
\ limits to the type and cost of such technologies. \n56"
- "Surveillance and criminal justice system algorithms such as risk assessments,\
\ predictive \n policing, automated license plate readers, real-time facial\
\ recognition systems (especially \n those used in public places or during\
\ protected activities like peaceful protests), social media \n monitoring,\
\ and ankle monitoring devices; \nVoting-related systems such as signature matching\
\ tools; \nSystems with a potential privacy impact such as smart home systems\
\ and associated data, \n systems that use or collect health-related data,\
\ systems that use or collect education-related \n data, criminal justice\
\ system data, ad-targeting systems, and systems that perform big data \n \
\ analytics in order to build profiles or infer personal information about individuals;\
\ and \nAny system that has the meaningful potential to lead to algorithmic discrimination.\
\ \n• Equal opportunities, including but not limited to:"
- source_sentence: What impact do automated systems have on underserved communities?
sentences:
- "generation, summarization, search, and chat. These activities can take place\
\ within organizational \nsettings or in the public domain. \nOrganizations can\
\ restrict AI applications that cause harm, exceed stated risk tolerances, or\
\ that conflict \nwith their tolerances or values. Governance tools and protocols\
\ that are applied to other types of AI \nsystems can be applied to GAI systems.\
\ These plans and actions include: \n• Accessibility and reasonable \naccommodations\
\ \n• AI actor credentials and qualifications \n• Alignment to organizational\
\ values \n• Auditing and assessment \n• Change-management controls \n• Commercial\
\ use \n• Data provenance"
- "automated systems make on underserved communities and to institute proactive\
\ protections that support these \ncommunities. \n•\nAn automated system using\
\ nontraditional factors such as educational attainment and employment history\
\ as\npart of its loan underwriting and pricing model was found to be much more\
\ likely to charge an applicant who\nattended a Historically Black College or\
\ University (HBCU) higher loan prices for refinancing a student loan\nthan an\
\ applicant who did not attend an HBCU. This was found to be true even when controlling\
\ for\nother credit-related factors.32\n•\nA hiring tool that learned the features\
\ of a company's employees (predominantly men) rejected women appli\ncants for\
\ spurious and discriminatory reasons; resumes with the word “women’s,” such as\
\ “women’s\nchess club captain,” were penalized in the candidate ranking.33\n\
•\nA predictive model marketed as being able to predict whether students are likely\
\ to drop out of school was"
- "on a principle of local control, such that those individuals closest to the data\
\ subject have more access while \nthose who are less proximate do not (e.g.,\
\ a teacher has access to their students’ daily progress data while a \nsuperintendent\
\ does not). \nReporting. In addition to the reporting on data privacy (as listed\
\ above for non-sensitive data), entities devel-\noping technologies related to\
\ a sensitive domain and those collecting, using, storing, or sharing sensitive\
\ data \nshould, whenever appropriate, regularly provide public reports describing:\
\ any data security lapses or breaches \nthat resulted in sensitive data leaks;\
\ the number, type, and outcomes of ethical pre-reviews undertaken; a \ndescription\
\ of any data sold, shared, or made public, and how that data was assessed to\
\ determine it did not pres-\nent a sensitive data risk; and ongoing risk identification\
\ and management procedures, and any mitigation added"
model-index:
- name: SentenceTransformer based on sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2
results:
- task:
type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset:
name: Unknown
type: unknown
metrics:
- type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.8881578947368421
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
- type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.9868421052631579
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
- type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.9868421052631579
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
- type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 1.0
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
- type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.8881578947368421
name: Cosine Precision@1
- type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.32894736842105265
name: Cosine Precision@3
- type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.19736842105263155
name: Cosine Precision@5
- type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.09999999999999999
name: Cosine Precision@10
- type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.8881578947368421
name: Cosine Recall@1
- type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.9868421052631579
name: Cosine Recall@3
- type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.9868421052631579
name: Cosine Recall@5
- type: cosine_recall@10
value: 1.0
name: Cosine Recall@10
- type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.9499393562918366
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
- type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.9331140350877194
name: Cosine Mrr@10
- type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.9331140350877194
name: Cosine Map@100
- type: dot_accuracy@1
value: 0.8881578947368421
name: Dot Accuracy@1
- type: dot_accuracy@3
value: 0.9868421052631579
name: Dot Accuracy@3
- type: dot_accuracy@5
value: 0.9868421052631579
name: Dot Accuracy@5
- type: dot_accuracy@10
value: 1.0
name: Dot Accuracy@10
- type: dot_precision@1
value: 0.8881578947368421
name: Dot Precision@1
- type: dot_precision@3
value: 0.32894736842105265
name: Dot Precision@3
- type: dot_precision@5
value: 0.19736842105263155
name: Dot Precision@5
- type: dot_precision@10
value: 0.09999999999999999
name: Dot Precision@10
- type: dot_recall@1
value: 0.8881578947368421
name: Dot Recall@1
- type: dot_recall@3
value: 0.9868421052631579
name: Dot Recall@3
- type: dot_recall@5
value: 0.9868421052631579
name: Dot Recall@5
- type: dot_recall@10
value: 1.0
name: Dot Recall@10
- type: dot_ndcg@10
value: 0.9499393562918366
name: Dot Ndcg@10
- type: dot_mrr@10
value: 0.9331140350877194
name: Dot Mrr@10
- type: dot_map@100
value: 0.9331140350877194
name: Dot Map@100
- type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.8828125
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
- type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.96875
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
- type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.9921875
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
- type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 1.0
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
- type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.8828125
name: Cosine Precision@1
- type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.32291666666666663
name: Cosine Precision@3
- type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.19843750000000004
name: Cosine Precision@5
- type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.10000000000000002
name: Cosine Precision@10
- type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.8828125
name: Cosine Recall@1
- type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.96875
name: Cosine Recall@3
- type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.9921875
name: Cosine Recall@5
- type: cosine_recall@10
value: 1.0
name: Cosine Recall@10
- type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.9458381646710927
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
- type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.9279296875
name: Cosine Mrr@10
- type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.9279296875
name: Cosine Map@100
- type: dot_accuracy@1
value: 0.8828125
name: Dot Accuracy@1
- type: dot_accuracy@3
value: 0.96875
name: Dot Accuracy@3
- type: dot_accuracy@5
value: 0.9921875
name: Dot Accuracy@5
- type: dot_accuracy@10
value: 1.0
name: Dot Accuracy@10
- type: dot_precision@1
value: 0.8828125
name: Dot Precision@1
- type: dot_precision@3
value: 0.32291666666666663
name: Dot Precision@3
- type: dot_precision@5
value: 0.19843750000000004
name: Dot Precision@5
- type: dot_precision@10
value: 0.10000000000000002
name: Dot Precision@10
- type: dot_recall@1
value: 0.8828125
name: Dot Recall@1
- type: dot_recall@3
value: 0.96875
name: Dot Recall@3
- type: dot_recall@5
value: 0.9921875
name: Dot Recall@5
- type: dot_recall@10
value: 1.0
name: Dot Recall@10
- type: dot_ndcg@10
value: 0.9458381646710927
name: Dot Ndcg@10
- type: dot_mrr@10
value: 0.9279296875
name: Dot Mrr@10
- type: dot_map@100
value: 0.9279296875
name: Dot Map@100
---
# SentenceTransformer based on sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2
This is a [sentence-transformers](https://www.SBERT.net) model finetuned from [sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2](https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2). It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 768-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more.
## Model Details
### Model Description
- **Model Type:** Sentence Transformer
- **Base model:** [sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2](https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2)
- **Maximum Sequence Length:** 384 tokens
- **Output Dimensionality:** 768 tokens
- **Similarity Function:** Cosine Similarity
### Model Sources
- **Documentation:** [Sentence Transformers Documentation](https://sbert.net)
- **Repository:** [Sentence Transformers on GitHub](https://github.com/UKPLab/sentence-transformers)
- **Hugging Face:** [Sentence Transformers on Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/models?library=sentence-transformers)
### Full Model Architecture
```
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 384, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: MPNetModel
(1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 768, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
(2): Normalize()
)
```
## Usage
### Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)
First install the Sentence Transformers library:
```bash
pip install -U sentence-transformers
```
Then you can load this model and run inference.
```python
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SentenceTransformer("jet-taekyo/mpnet_finetuned_semantic")
# Run inference
sentences = [
'What impact do automated systems have on underserved communities?',
"automated systems make on underserved communities and to institute proactive protections that support these \ncommunities. \n•\nAn automated system using nontraditional factors such as educational attainment and employment history as\npart of its loan underwriting and pricing model was found to be much more likely to charge an applicant who\nattended a Historically Black College or University (HBCU) higher loan prices for refinancing a student loan\nthan an applicant who did not attend an HBCU. This was found to be true even when controlling for\nother credit-related factors.32\n•\nA hiring tool that learned the features of a company's employees (predominantly men) rejected women appli\xad\ncants for spurious and discriminatory reasons; resumes with the word “women’s,” such as “women’s\nchess club captain,” were penalized in the candidate ranking.33\n•\nA predictive model marketed as being able to predict whether students are likely to drop out of school was",
'on a principle of local control, such that those individuals closest to the data subject have more access while \nthose who are less proximate do not (e.g., a teacher has access to their students’ daily progress data while a \nsuperintendent does not). \nReporting. In addition to the reporting on data privacy (as listed above for non-sensitive data), entities devel-\noping technologies related to a sensitive domain and those collecting, using, storing, or sharing sensitive data \nshould, whenever appropriate, regularly provide public reports describing: any data security lapses or breaches \nthat resulted in sensitive data leaks; the number, type, and outcomes of ethical pre-reviews undertaken; a \ndescription of any data sold, shared, or made public, and how that data was assessed to determine it did not pres-\nent a sensitive data risk; and ongoing risk identification and management procedures, and any mitigation added',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
# [3, 768]
# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities.shape)
# [3, 3]
```
## Evaluation
### Metrics
#### Information Retrieval
* Evaluated with [InformationRetrievalEvaluator
](https://sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/evaluation.html#sentence_transformers.evaluation.InformationRetrievalEvaluator)
| Metric | Value |
|:--------------------|:-----------|
| cosine_accuracy@1 | 0.8882 |
| cosine_accuracy@3 | 0.9868 |
| cosine_accuracy@5 | 0.9868 |
| cosine_accuracy@10 | 1.0 |
| cosine_precision@1 | 0.8882 |
| cosine_precision@3 | 0.3289 |
| cosine_precision@5 | 0.1974 |
| cosine_precision@10 | 0.1 |
| cosine_recall@1 | 0.8882 |
| cosine_recall@3 | 0.9868 |
| cosine_recall@5 | 0.9868 |
| cosine_recall@10 | 1.0 |
| cosine_ndcg@10 | 0.9499 |
| cosine_mrr@10 | 0.9331 |
| **cosine_map@100** | **0.9331** |
| dot_accuracy@1 | 0.8882 |
| dot_accuracy@3 | 0.9868 |
| dot_accuracy@5 | 0.9868 |
| dot_accuracy@10 | 1.0 |
| dot_precision@1 | 0.8882 |
| dot_precision@3 | 0.3289 |
| dot_precision@5 | 0.1974 |
| dot_precision@10 | 0.1 |
| dot_recall@1 | 0.8882 |
| dot_recall@3 | 0.9868 |
| dot_recall@5 | 0.9868 |
| dot_recall@10 | 1.0 |
| dot_ndcg@10 | 0.9499 |
| dot_mrr@10 | 0.9331 |
| dot_map@100 | 0.9331 |
#### Information Retrieval
* Evaluated with [InformationRetrievalEvaluator
](https://sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/evaluation.html#sentence_transformers.evaluation.InformationRetrievalEvaluator)
| Metric | Value |
|:--------------------|:-----------|
| cosine_accuracy@1 | 0.8828 |
| cosine_accuracy@3 | 0.9688 |
| cosine_accuracy@5 | 0.9922 |
| cosine_accuracy@10 | 1.0 |
| cosine_precision@1 | 0.8828 |
| cosine_precision@3 | 0.3229 |
| cosine_precision@5 | 0.1984 |
| cosine_precision@10 | 0.1 |
| cosine_recall@1 | 0.8828 |
| cosine_recall@3 | 0.9688 |
| cosine_recall@5 | 0.9922 |
| cosine_recall@10 | 1.0 |
| cosine_ndcg@10 | 0.9458 |
| cosine_mrr@10 | 0.9279 |
| **cosine_map@100** | **0.9279** |
| dot_accuracy@1 | 0.8828 |
| dot_accuracy@3 | 0.9688 |
| dot_accuracy@5 | 0.9922 |
| dot_accuracy@10 | 1.0 |
| dot_precision@1 | 0.8828 |
| dot_precision@3 | 0.3229 |
| dot_precision@5 | 0.1984 |
| dot_precision@10 | 0.1 |
| dot_recall@1 | 0.8828 |
| dot_recall@3 | 0.9688 |
| dot_recall@5 | 0.9922 |
| dot_recall@10 | 1.0 |
| dot_ndcg@10 | 0.9458 |
| dot_mrr@10 | 0.9279 |
| dot_map@100 | 0.9279 |
## Training Details
### Training Dataset
#### Unnamed Dataset
* Size: 714 training samples
* Columns: sentence_0
and sentence_1
* Approximate statistics based on the first 714 samples:
| | sentence_0 | sentence_1 |
|:--------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| type | string | string |
| details |
What are the key characteristics of high-integrity information?
| This information can be linked to the original source(s) with appropriate evidence. High-integrity
information is also accurate and reliable, can be verified and authenticated, has a clear chain of custody,
and creates reasonable expectations about when its validity may expire.”11
11 This definition of information integrity is derived from the 2022 White House Roadmap for Researchers on
Priorities Related to Information Integrity Research and Development.
|
| How can the validity of information be verified and authenticated?
| This information can be linked to the original source(s) with appropriate evidence. High-integrity
information is also accurate and reliable, can be verified and authenticated, has a clear chain of custody,
and creates reasonable expectations about when its validity may expire.”11
11 This definition of information integrity is derived from the 2022 White House Roadmap for Researchers on
Priorities Related to Information Integrity Research and Development.
|
| What should trigger the use of a human alternative in the attainment process?
| In many scenarios, there is a reasonable expectation
of human involvement in attaining rights, opportunities, or access. When automated systems make up part of
the attainment process, alternative timely human-driven processes should be provided. The use of a human
alternative should be triggered by an opt-out process. Timely and not burdensome human alternative. Opting out should be timely and not unreasonably
burdensome in both the process of requesting to opt-out and the human-driven alternative provided. Provide timely human consideration and remedy by a fallback and escalation system in the
event that an automated system fails, produces error, or you would like to appeal or con
test its impacts on you
Proportionate. The availability of human consideration and fallback, along with associated training and
safeguards against human bias, should be proportionate to the potential of the automated system to meaning
fully impact rights, opportunities, or access. Automated systems that have greater control over outcomes,
provide input to high-stakes decisions, relate to sensitive domains, or otherwise have a greater potential to
meaningfully impact rights, opportunities, or access should have greater availability (e.g., staffing) and over
sight of human consideration and fallback mechanisms. Accessible. Mechanisms for human consideration and fallback, whether in-person, on paper, by phone, or
otherwise provided, should be easy to find and use. These mechanisms should be tested to ensure that users
who have trouble with the automated system are able to use human consideration and fallback, with the under
standing that it may be these users who are most likely to need the human assistance. Similarly, it should be
tested to ensure that users with disabilities are able to find and use human consideration and fallback and also
request reasonable accommodations or modifications. Convenient. Mechanisms for human consideration and fallback should not be unreasonably burdensome as
compared to the automated system’s equivalent. 49
|
* Loss: [MatryoshkaLoss
](https://sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/losses.html#matryoshkaloss) with these parameters:
```json
{
"loss": "MultipleNegativesRankingLoss",
"matryoshka_dims": [
768,
512,
256,
128,
64
],
"matryoshka_weights": [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
],
"n_dims_per_step": -1
}
```
### Training Hyperparameters
#### Non-Default Hyperparameters
- `eval_strategy`: steps
- `per_device_train_batch_size`: 20
- `per_device_eval_batch_size`: 20
- `num_train_epochs`: 5
- `multi_dataset_batch_sampler`: round_robin
#### All Hyperparameters