DeDeckerThomas commited on
Commit
da1898a
β€’
1 Parent(s): f804ef4

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +68 -32
README.md CHANGED
@@ -6,7 +6,17 @@ tags:
6
  datasets:
7
  - midas/inspec
8
  widget:
9
- - text: "Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a text. Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries. Now with the recent innovations in NLP, transformers can be used to improve keyphrase extraction. Transformers also focus on the semantics and context of a document, which is quite an improvement."
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10
  example_title: "Example 1"
11
  - text: "In this work, we explore how to learn task specific language models aimed towards learning rich representation of keyphrases from text documents. We experiment with different masking strategies for pre-training transformer language models (LMs) in discriminative as well as generative settings. In the discriminative setting, we introduce a new pre-training objective - Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement (KBIR), showing large gains in performance (up to 9.26 points in F1) over SOTA, when LM pre-trained using KBIR is fine-tuned for the task of keyphrase extraction. In the generative setting, we introduce a new pre-training setup for BART - KeyBART, that reproduces the keyphrases related to the input text in the CatSeq format, instead of the denoised original input. This also led to gains in performance (up to 4.33 points inF1@M) over SOTA for keyphrase generation. Additionally, we also fine-tune the pre-trained language models on named entity recognition(NER), question answering (QA), relation extraction (RE), abstractive summarization and achieve comparable performance with that of the SOTA, showing that learning rich representation of keyphrases is indeed beneficial for many other fundamental NLP tasks."
12
  example_title: "Example 2"
@@ -34,24 +44,25 @@ model-index:
34
  name: F1@O (Absent)
35
  ---
36
 
37
- # πŸ”‘ Keyphrase Generation model: KeyBART-inspec
38
- Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a text. Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics, are widely used for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community has the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries. Now with the recent innovations in NLP, transformers can be used to improve keyphrase extraction. Transformers also focus on the semantics and context of a document, which is quite an improvement.
 
 
39
 
40
  ## πŸ““ Model Description
41
- This model is a fine-tuned KeyBART model on the Inspec dataset.
42
- KeyBART focuses on learning a better representation of keyphrases in a generative setting. It produces the keyphrases associated with the input. This is accomplished by predicting the original input based on a changed input. The input is changed by token masking, keyphrase masking and keyphrase replacement. This model can already be used without any fine-tuning, but can be fine-tuned if needed.
43
  You can find more information about the architecture in this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08547.
44
 
45
  Kulkarni, Mayank, Debanjan Mahata, Ravneet Arora, and Rajarshi Bhowmik. "Learning Rich Representation of Keyphrases from Text." arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.08547 (2021).
46
 
47
- ## βœ‹ Intended uses & limitations
48
  ### πŸ›‘ Limitations
49
  * This keyphrase generation model is very domain-specific and will perform very well on abstracts of scientific papers. It's not recommended to use this model for other domains, but you are free to test it out.
50
  * Only works for English documents.
51
- * For a custom model, please consult the training notebook for more information (link incoming).
52
  * Sometimes the output doesn't make any sense.
53
 
54
- ### ❓ How to use
55
  ```python
56
  # Model parameters
57
  from transformers import (
@@ -85,17 +96,24 @@ model_name = "ml6team/keyphrase-generation-keybart-inspec"
85
  generator = KeyphraseGenerationPipeline(model=model_name)
86
 
87
  ```python
 
88
  text = """
89
- Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a text.
90
- Since this is a time-consuming process, Artificial Intelligence is used to automate it.
91
- Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistics and linguistics,
92
- are widely used for the extraction process. The fact that these methods have been widely used in the community
93
- has the advantage that there are many easy-to-use libraries. Now with the recent innovations in NLP,
94
- transformers can be used to improve keyphrase extraction. Transformers also focus on the semantics
95
- and context of a document, which is quite an improvement.
96
- """.replace(
97
- "\n", ""
98
- )
 
 
 
 
 
 
99
 
100
  keyphrases = generator(text)
101
 
@@ -105,18 +123,18 @@ print(keyphrases)
105
 
106
  ```
107
  # Output
108
- [['keyphrase extraction', 'text analysis', 'artificial intelligence', 'classical machine learning', 'statistics']]
109
  ```
110
 
111
  ## πŸ“š Training Dataset
112
- Inspec is a keyphrase extraction/generation dataset consisting of 2000 English scientific papers from the scientific domains of Computers and Control and Information Technology published between 1998 to 2002. The keyphrases are annotated by professional indexers or editors.
113
 
114
- You can find more information here: https://huggingface.co/datasets/midas/inspec.
115
 
116
- ## πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈ Training procedure
117
- For more in detail information, you can take a look at the training notebook (link incoming).
118
 
119
- ### Training parameters
120
 
121
  | Parameter | Value |
122
  | --------- | ------|
@@ -125,9 +143,22 @@ For more in detail information, you can take a look at the training notebook (li
125
  | Early Stopping Patience | 1 |
126
 
127
  ### Preprocessing
128
- The documents in the dataset are already preprocessed into list of words with the corresponding keyphrases. The only thing that must be done is tokenization and joining all keyphrases into one string with a certain seperator of choice(;).
129
  ```python
130
- def pre_process_keyphrases(text_ids, kp_list):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
131
  kp_order_list = []
132
  kp_set = set(kp_list)
133
  text = tokenizer.decode(
@@ -159,7 +190,7 @@ def preprocess_fuction(samples):
159
  padding="max_length",
160
  truncation=True,
161
  )
162
- present_kp, absent_kp = pre_process_keyphrases(
163
  text_ids=inputs["input_ids"],
164
  kp_list=samples["extractive_keyphrases"][i]
165
  + samples["abstractive_keyphrases"][i],
@@ -181,6 +212,12 @@ def preprocess_fuction(samples):
181
  processed_samples[key].append(inputs[key])
182
  processed_samples["labels"].append(targets["input_ids"])
183
  return processed_samples
 
 
 
 
 
 
184
  ```
185
 
186
  ### Postprocessing
@@ -190,25 +227,24 @@ def extract_keyphrases(examples):
190
  return [example.split(keyphrase_sep_token) for example in examples]
191
  ```
192
  ## πŸ“ Evaluation results
193
-
194
- One of the traditional evaluation methods is the precision, recall and F1-score @k,m where k is the number that stands for the first k predicted keyphrases and m for the average amount of predicted keyphrases.
195
  The model achieves the following results on the Inspec test set:
196
 
197
 
198
- ### Extractive keyphrases
199
 
200
  | Dataset | P@5 | R@5 | F1@5 | P@10 | R@10 | F1@10 | P@M | R@M | F1@M | P@O | R@O | F1@O |
201
  |:-----------------:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
202
  | Inspec Test Set | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
203
 
204
- ### Abstractive keyphrases
205
 
206
  | Dataset | P@5 | R@5 | F1@5 | P@10 | R@10 | F1@10 | P@M | R@M | F1@M | P@O | R@O | F1@O |
207
  |:-----------------:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
208
  | Inspec Test Set | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
209
 
210
 
211
- For more information on the evaluation process, you can take a look at the keyphrase extraction evaluation notebook.
212
 
213
  ## 🚨 Issues
214
  Please feel free to start discussions in the Community Tab.
 
6
  datasets:
7
  - midas/inspec
8
  widget:
9
+ - text: "Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a document.
10
+ Thanks to these keyphrases humans can understand the content of a text very quickly and easily without reading
11
+ it completely. Keyphrase extraction was first done primarily by human annotators, who read the text in detail
12
+ and then wrote down the most important keyphrases. The disadvantage is that if you work with a lot of documents,
13
+ this process can take a lot of time.
14
+
15
+ Here is where Artificial Intelligence comes in. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistical
16
+ and linguistic features, are widely used for the extraction process. Now with deep learning, it is possible to capture
17
+ the semantic meaning of a text even better than these classical methods. Classical methods look at the frequency,
18
+ occurrence and order of words in the text, whereas these neural approaches can capture long-term semantic dependencies
19
+ and context of words in a text."
20
  example_title: "Example 1"
21
  - text: "In this work, we explore how to learn task specific language models aimed towards learning rich representation of keyphrases from text documents. We experiment with different masking strategies for pre-training transformer language models (LMs) in discriminative as well as generative settings. In the discriminative setting, we introduce a new pre-training objective - Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement (KBIR), showing large gains in performance (up to 9.26 points in F1) over SOTA, when LM pre-trained using KBIR is fine-tuned for the task of keyphrase extraction. In the generative setting, we introduce a new pre-training setup for BART - KeyBART, that reproduces the keyphrases related to the input text in the CatSeq format, instead of the denoised original input. This also led to gains in performance (up to 4.33 points inF1@M) over SOTA for keyphrase generation. Additionally, we also fine-tune the pre-trained language models on named entity recognition(NER), question answering (QA), relation extraction (RE), abstractive summarization and achieve comparable performance with that of the SOTA, showing that learning rich representation of keyphrases is indeed beneficial for many other fundamental NLP tasks."
22
  example_title: "Example 2"
 
44
  name: F1@O (Absent)
45
  ---
46
 
47
+ # πŸ”‘ Keyphrase Generation Model: KeyBART-inspec
48
+ Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a document. Thanks to these keyphrases humans can understand the content of a text very quickly and easily without reading it completely. Keyphrase extraction was first done primarily by human annotators, who read the text in detail and then wrote down the most important keyphrases. The disadvantage is that if you work with a lot of documents, this process can take a lot of time ⏳.
49
+
50
+ Here is where Artificial Intelligence πŸ€– comes in. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistical and linguistic features, are widely used for the extraction process. Now with deep learning, it is possible to capture the semantic meaning of a text even better than these classical methods. Classical methods look at the frequency, occurrence and order of words in the text, whereas these neural approaches can capture long-term semantic dependencies and context of words in a text.
51
 
52
  ## πŸ““ Model Description
53
+ This model uses [KeyBART](https://huggingface.co/bloomberg/KeyBART) as its base model and fine-tunes it on the [Inspec dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/midas/inspec). KeyBART focuses on learning a better representation of keyphrases in a generative setting. It produces the keyphrases associated with the input. This is accomplished by predicting the original input based on a changed input. The input is changed by token masking, keyphrase masking and keyphrase replacement. This model can already be used without any fine-tuning, but can be fine-tuned if needed.
 
54
  You can find more information about the architecture in this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08547.
55
 
56
  Kulkarni, Mayank, Debanjan Mahata, Ravneet Arora, and Rajarshi Bhowmik. "Learning Rich Representation of Keyphrases from Text." arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.08547 (2021).
57
 
58
+ ## βœ‹ Intended Uses & Limitations
59
  ### πŸ›‘ Limitations
60
  * This keyphrase generation model is very domain-specific and will perform very well on abstracts of scientific papers. It's not recommended to use this model for other domains, but you are free to test it out.
61
  * Only works for English documents.
62
+ * For a custom model, please consult the [training notebook]() for more information.
63
  * Sometimes the output doesn't make any sense.
64
 
65
+ ### ❓ How To Use
66
  ```python
67
  # Model parameters
68
  from transformers import (
 
96
  generator = KeyphraseGenerationPipeline(model=model_name)
97
 
98
  ```python
99
+ # Inference
100
  text = """
101
+ Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the
102
+ important keyphrases from a document. Thanks to these keyphrases humans can
103
+ understand the content of a text very quickly and easily without reading it
104
+ completely. Keyphrase extraction was first done primarily by human annotators,
105
+ who read the text in detail and then wrote down the most important keyphrases.
106
+ The disadvantage is that if you work with a lot of documents, this process
107
+ can take a lot of time.
108
+
109
+ Here is where Artificial Intelligence comes in. Currently, classical machine
110
+ learning methods, that use statistical and linguistic features, are widely used
111
+ for the extraction process. Now with deep learning, it is possible to capture
112
+ the semantic meaning of a text even better than these classical methods.
113
+ Classical methods look at the frequency, occurrence and order of words
114
+ in the text, whereas these neural approaches can capture long-term
115
+ semantic dependencies and context of words in a text.
116
+ """.replace("\n", " ")
117
 
118
  keyphrases = generator(text)
119
 
 
123
 
124
  ```
125
  # Output
126
+ [['keyphrase extraction', 'text analysis', 'keyphrases', 'human annotators', 'artificial']]
127
  ```
128
 
129
  ## πŸ“š Training Dataset
130
+ [Inspec](https://huggingface.co/datasets/midas/inspec) is a keyphrase extraction/generation dataset consisting of 2000 English scientific papers from the scientific domains of Computers and Control and Information Technology published between 1998 to 2002. The keyphrases are annotated by professional indexers or editors.
131
 
132
+ You can find more information in the [paper](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3115/1119355.1119383).
133
 
134
+ ## πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈ Training Procedure
135
+ For more in detail information, you can take a look at the [training notebook]().
136
 
137
+ ### Training Parameters
138
 
139
  | Parameter | Value |
140
  | --------- | ------|
 
143
  | Early Stopping Patience | 1 |
144
 
145
  ### Preprocessing
146
+ The documents in the dataset are already preprocessed into list of words with the corresponding keyphrases. The only thing that must be done is tokenization and joining all keyphrases into one string with a certain seperator of choice( ```;``` ).
147
  ```python
148
+ from datasets import load_dataset
149
+ from transformers import AutoTokenizer
150
+
151
+ # Tokenizer
152
+ tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("bloomberg/KeyBART", add_prefix_space=True)
153
+
154
+ # Dataset parameters
155
+ dataset_full_name = "midas/inspec"
156
+ dataset_subset = "raw"
157
+ dataset_document_column = "document"
158
+
159
+ keyphrase_sep_token = ";"
160
+
161
+ def preprocess_keyphrases(text_ids, kp_list):
162
  kp_order_list = []
163
  kp_set = set(kp_list)
164
  text = tokenizer.decode(
 
190
  padding="max_length",
191
  truncation=True,
192
  )
193
+ present_kp, absent_kp = preprocess_keyphrases(
194
  text_ids=inputs["input_ids"],
195
  kp_list=samples["extractive_keyphrases"][i]
196
  + samples["abstractive_keyphrases"][i],
 
212
  processed_samples[key].append(inputs[key])
213
  processed_samples["labels"].append(targets["input_ids"])
214
  return processed_samples
215
+
216
+ # Load dataset
217
+ dataset = load_dataset(dataset_full_name, dataset_subset)
218
+ # Preprocess dataset
219
+ tokenized_dataset = dataset.map(preprocess_fuction, batched=True)
220
+
221
  ```
222
 
223
  ### Postprocessing
 
227
  return [example.split(keyphrase_sep_token) for example in examples]
228
  ```
229
  ## πŸ“ Evaluation results
230
+ Traditional evaluation methods are the precision, recall and F1-score @k,m where k is the number that stands for the first k predicted keyphrases and m for the average amount of predicted keyphrases.
 
231
  The model achieves the following results on the Inspec test set:
232
 
233
 
234
+ ### Extractive Keyphrases
235
 
236
  | Dataset | P@5 | R@5 | F1@5 | P@10 | R@10 | F1@10 | P@M | R@M | F1@M | P@O | R@O | F1@O |
237
  |:-----------------:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
238
  | Inspec Test Set | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
239
 
240
+ ### Abstractive Keyphrases
241
 
242
  | Dataset | P@5 | R@5 | F1@5 | P@10 | R@10 | F1@10 | P@M | R@M | F1@M | P@O | R@O | F1@O |
243
  |:-----------------:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
244
  | Inspec Test Set | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
245
 
246
 
247
+ For more information on the evaluation process, you can take a look at the keyphrase extraction [evaluation notebook]().
248
 
249
  ## 🚨 Issues
250
  Please feel free to start discussions in the Community Tab.