# embeddings_queue

created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 1434ce38-634a-456f-8432-e29862dec4c2
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " cgerman.nsf I created a purchase from CES (deal 149778) to replace the CPR STORAGE deal. Victor, please move the daily volumes to deal 149778. As far as I can tell, ENA should not be billing CES for their storage gas. So, we should show a purchase from CES for the storage gas. Of course it will get much more complicated once we resolve all of the retail issues. ", "row": 220, "chroma:document": "file: germany-c/discussion_threads/318.\nmessage: cgerman.nsf I created a purchase from CES (deal 149778) to replace the CPR STORAGE deal. Victor, please move the daily volumes to deal 149778. As far as I can tell, ENA should not be billing CES for their storage gas. So, we should show a purchase from CES for the storage gas. Of course it will get much more complicated once we resolve all of the retail issues.\nlength: 365"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 6545979d-5f2f-4084-ab78-bb23f77798b9
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " cgerman.nsf I created a purchase from CES (deal 149778) to replace the CPR STORAGE deal. Victor, please move the daily volumes to deal 149778. As far as I can tell, ENA should not be billing CES for their storage gas. So, we should show a purchase from CES for the storage gas. Of course it will get much more complicated once we resolve all of the retail issues. ", "row": 220, "chroma:document": "length: 365\nlabels: germany-c/discussion_threads/318. Message-ID: <22599195.1075853738703.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 05:21:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 5eb89503-0221-485e-818d-be9e6e3db4b5
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 05:51 PM --------------------------- Molly Harris 12/21/99 05:11 PM To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EOL Credit Responses 12/21 Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 12/21. Regards Molly ", "row": 221, "chroma:document": "file: taylor-m/sent/700."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: c205afc7-cdd4-4f28-932d-b6d3e764453f
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 05:51 PM --------------------------- Molly Harris 12/21/99 05:11 PM To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EOL Credit Responses 12/21 Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 12/21. Regards Molly ", "row": 221, "chroma:document": "message: mtaylor.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 05:51 PM --------------------------- Molly Harris 12/21/99 05:11 PM To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 1e4c9a59-91af-4e13-b253-2083be410483
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 05:51 PM --------------------------- Molly Harris 12/21/99 05:11 PM To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EOL Credit Responses 12/21 Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 12/21. Regards Molly ", "row": 221, "chroma:document": "R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EOL Credit Responses 12/21 Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 12/21. Regards Molly"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: c6577af8-bbc9-49d2-a5b5-e16e4e638595
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 05:51 PM --------------------------- Molly Harris 12/21/99 05:11 PM To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EOL Credit Responses 12/21 Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 12/21. Regards Molly ", "row": 221, "chroma:document": "length: 806\nlabels: taylor-m/sent/700. Message-ID: <28688315.1075860064728.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 09:51:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: b349867d-a7f8-439a-9be6-f344cfd924fd
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Williams III, Bill (Non-Privileged).pst Attached are the Total Transfer Capabilities (TTC's) for July 8, July 9, and July 10, 2001. <<TTC 07-08-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-09-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-10-01.PDF>> The attached Outage information is reliable at time of posting. The attached Outage information is subject to change without notice. Myrna Neeley Administrative Assistant Outage Coordination & Transmission Maintenance California Independent System Operator Voice: 916-351-2171 Fax: 916-351-2367 E-mail mneeley@caiso.com - TTC 07-08-01.PDF - TTC 07-09-01.PDF - TTC 07-10-01.PDF ", "row": 222, "chroma:document": "file: williams-w3/bill_williams_iii/745."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: a616de96-1a2f-4f7c-83a1-1a68e0d244a8
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Williams III, Bill (Non-Privileged).pst Attached are the Total Transfer Capabilities (TTC's) for July 8, July 9, and July 10, 2001. <<TTC 07-08-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-09-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-10-01.PDF>> The attached Outage information is reliable at time of posting. The attached Outage information is subject to change without notice. Myrna Neeley Administrative Assistant Outage Coordination & Transmission Maintenance California Independent System Operator Voice: 916-351-2171 Fax: 916-351-2367 E-mail mneeley@caiso.com - TTC 07-08-01.PDF - TTC 07-09-01.PDF - TTC 07-10-01.PDF ", "row": 222, "chroma:document": "message: Williams III, Bill (Non-Privileged).pst Attached are the Total Transfer Capabilities (TTC's) for July 8, July 9, and July 10, 2001. <<TTC 07-08-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-09-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-10-01.PDF>> The attached Outage information is reliable at time of posting. The attached Outage information is subject to change without notice. Myrna Neeley Administrative Assistant Outage Coordination & Transmission Maintenance California Independent System Operator Voice: 916-351-2171 Fax: 916-351-2367 E-mail"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: ca1927ef-b230-479a-bd1f-469765576fdb
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Williams III, Bill (Non-Privileged).pst Attached are the Total Transfer Capabilities (TTC's) for July 8, July 9, and July 10, 2001. <<TTC 07-08-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-09-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-10-01.PDF>> The attached Outage information is reliable at time of posting. The attached Outage information is subject to change without notice. Myrna Neeley Administrative Assistant Outage Coordination & Transmission Maintenance California Independent System Operator Voice: 916-351-2171 Fax: 916-351-2367 E-mail mneeley@caiso.com - TTC 07-08-01.PDF - TTC 07-09-01.PDF - TTC 07-10-01.PDF ", "row": 222, "chroma:document": "Maintenance California Independent System Operator Voice: 916-351-2171 Fax: 916-351-2367 E-mail mneeley@caiso.com - TTC 07-08-01.PDF - TTC 07-09-01.PDF - TTC 07-10-01.PDF"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: ef8a6f8f-f98f-4706-a9b4-0e3d33d88022
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Williams III, Bill (Non-Privileged).pst Attached are the Total Transfer Capabilities (TTC's) for July 8, July 9, and July 10, 2001. <<TTC 07-08-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-09-01.PDF>> <<TTC 07-10-01.PDF>> The attached Outage information is reliable at time of posting. The attached Outage information is subject to change without notice. Myrna Neeley Administrative Assistant Outage Coordination & Transmission Maintenance California Independent System Operator Voice: 916-351-2171 Fax: 916-351-2367 E-mail mneeley@caiso.com - TTC 07-08-01.PDF - TTC 07-09-01.PDF - TTC 07-10-01.PDF ", "row": 222, "chroma:document": "length: 573\nlabels: williams-w3/bill_williams_iii/745. Message-ID: <1693926.1075863312864.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:29:36 -0700 (PDT)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 4b79547e-c8ae-4025-be79-480a6e70dda5
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " jdasovic.nsf u up for going to the dome wednesday night?", "row": 223, "chroma:document": "file: dasovich-j/sent/4666.\nmessage: jdasovic.nsf u up for going to the dome wednesday night?\nlength: 57\nlabels: dasovich-j/sent/4666. Message-ID: <12161949.1075843893573.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Fri, 18 May 2001 05:25:00 -0700 (PDT)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 1d1d62e2-5748-4650-b5be-302ef638207d
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf Sandeep, ? We've?completed a review?this morning to try to fill in missing pieces?of information on hourly load shapes, hydro dispatch history, and transactions for India and have not come up with anything yet. Would you know of any of the above information which would?assist us in our efforts? ? Thanks, ? David Yomogida ? ----- Original Message ----- From: David To: Sandeep Kohli Cc: Robert Schenck-Australia ; Vince J Kaminski ; Stinson Gibner Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: ENRON, India Database Sandeep, ? Below, I have summarized Henwood's work on the India database to date. ? The \"Inter_Regional Links.ppt\" file shows the topology and links between bubbles in the our model and \"Expand_India_Data_011000.xls\" details the existing station information that we have compiled to date.?Total resources closely match reported resources as shown in \"L&R_0110.xls\". Reported India total in 1997 is 86,000 MW and that in the Henwood database is 84,000 MW through 1997. ? Region \t \t \tEMSS database \t\t \t\t \t\tReported [1] \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\tDifference \t\t\t India total \t \t \t84,103 \t\t \t\t \t\t86,120 \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\t2,017 \t\t\t ? ? We are currently working on the development of hourly load shaping, seasonal hydro energy allocation, and the gathering of transaction information. Sandeep, we will try to contact you tomorrow (Thursday -- Australia?or Wednesday -- United States) to answer any questions that you may have on this information. ? Sincerely, ? David Yomogida ? ?", "row": 224, "chroma:document": "file: kaminski-v/all_documents/2197."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 0d4837bd-fc4a-401b-a6cd-6a0d44dbff22
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf Sandeep, ? We've?completed a review?this morning to try to fill in missing pieces?of information on hourly load shapes, hydro dispatch history, and transactions for India and have not come up with anything yet. Would you know of any of the above information which would?assist us in our efforts? ? Thanks, ? David Yomogida ? ----- Original Message ----- From: David To: Sandeep Kohli Cc: Robert Schenck-Australia ; Vince J Kaminski ; Stinson Gibner Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: ENRON, India Database Sandeep, ? Below, I have summarized Henwood's work on the India database to date. ? The \"Inter_Regional Links.ppt\" file shows the topology and links between bubbles in the our model and \"Expand_India_Data_011000.xls\" details the existing station information that we have compiled to date.?Total resources closely match reported resources as shown in \"L&R_0110.xls\". Reported India total in 1997 is 86,000 MW and that in the Henwood database is 84,000 MW through 1997. ? Region \t \t \tEMSS database \t\t \t\t \t\tReported [1] \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\tDifference \t\t\t India total \t \t \t84,103 \t\t \t\t \t\t86,120 \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\t2,017 \t\t\t ? ? We are currently working on the development of hourly load shaping, seasonal hydro energy allocation, and the gathering of transaction information. Sandeep, we will try to contact you tomorrow (Thursday -- Australia?or Wednesday -- United States) to answer any questions that you may have on this information. ? Sincerely, ? David Yomogida ? ?", "row": 224, "chroma:document": "message: vkamins.nsf Sandeep, ? We've?completed a review?this morning to try to fill in missing pieces?of information on hourly load shapes, hydro dispatch history, and transactions for India and have not come up with anything yet. Would you know of any of the above information which would?assist us in our efforts? ? Thanks, ? David Yomogida ? ----- Original Message ----- From: David To: Sandeep Kohli Cc: Robert Schenck-Australia ; Vince J Kaminski ; Stinson Gibner Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 6:20 PM"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 434ec974-b05c-49e6-b777-4c6eb4aec70b
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf Sandeep, ? We've?completed a review?this morning to try to fill in missing pieces?of information on hourly load shapes, hydro dispatch history, and transactions for India and have not come up with anything yet. Would you know of any of the above information which would?assist us in our efforts? ? Thanks, ? David Yomogida ? ----- Original Message ----- From: David To: Sandeep Kohli Cc: Robert Schenck-Australia ; Vince J Kaminski ; Stinson Gibner Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: ENRON, India Database Sandeep, ? Below, I have summarized Henwood's work on the India database to date. ? The \"Inter_Regional Links.ppt\" file shows the topology and links between bubbles in the our model and \"Expand_India_Data_011000.xls\" details the existing station information that we have compiled to date.?Total resources closely match reported resources as shown in \"L&R_0110.xls\". Reported India total in 1997 is 86,000 MW and that in the Henwood database is 84,000 MW through 1997. ? Region \t \t \tEMSS database \t\t \t\t \t\tReported [1] \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\tDifference \t\t\t India total \t \t \t84,103 \t\t \t\t \t\t86,120 \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\t2,017 \t\t\t ? ? We are currently working on the development of hourly load shaping, seasonal hydro energy allocation, and the gathering of transaction information. Sandeep, we will try to contact you tomorrow (Thursday -- Australia?or Wednesday -- United States) to answer any questions that you may have on this information. ? Sincerely, ? David Yomogida ? ?", "row": 224, "chroma:document": "Schenck-Australia ; Vince J Kaminski ; Stinson Gibner Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: ENRON, India Database Sandeep, ? Below, I have summarized Henwood's work on the India database to date. ? The \"Inter_Regional Links.ppt\" file shows the topology and links between bubbles in the our model and \"Expand_India_Data_011000.xls\" details the existing station information that we have compiled to date.?Total resources closely match reported resources as shown in \"L&R_0110.xls\". Reported India"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: a1c6f9bc-44aa-41cb-96c7-fba96da71008
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf Sandeep, ? We've?completed a review?this morning to try to fill in missing pieces?of information on hourly load shapes, hydro dispatch history, and transactions for India and have not come up with anything yet. Would you know of any of the above information which would?assist us in our efforts? ? Thanks, ? David Yomogida ? ----- Original Message ----- From: David To: Sandeep Kohli Cc: Robert Schenck-Australia ; Vince J Kaminski ; Stinson Gibner Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: ENRON, India Database Sandeep, ? Below, I have summarized Henwood's work on the India database to date. ? The \"Inter_Regional Links.ppt\" file shows the topology and links between bubbles in the our model and \"Expand_India_Data_011000.xls\" details the existing station information that we have compiled to date.?Total resources closely match reported resources as shown in \"L&R_0110.xls\". Reported India total in 1997 is 86,000 MW and that in the Henwood database is 84,000 MW through 1997. ? Region \t \t \tEMSS database \t\t \t\t \t\tReported [1] \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\tDifference \t\t\t India total \t \t \t84,103 \t\t \t\t \t\t86,120 \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\t2,017 \t\t\t ? ? We are currently working on the development of hourly load shaping, seasonal hydro energy allocation, and the gathering of transaction information. Sandeep, we will try to contact you tomorrow (Thursday -- Australia?or Wednesday -- United States) to answer any questions that you may have on this information. ? Sincerely, ? David Yomogida ? ?", "row": 224, "chroma:document": "date.?Total resources closely match reported resources as shown in \"L&R_0110.xls\". Reported India total in 1997 is 86,000 MW and that in the Henwood database is 84,000 MW through 1997. ? Region \t \t \tEMSS database \t\t \t\t \t\tReported [1] \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\tDifference \t\t\t India total \t \t \t84,103 \t\t \t\t \t\t86,120 \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\t2,017 \t\t\t ? ? We are currently working on the development of hourly load shaping, seasonal hydro energy allocation, and the gathering of transaction information. Sandeep, we will try to contact you"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: b598a5f2-04da-414b-9a39-ce0c717af4b2
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf Sandeep, ? We've?completed a review?this morning to try to fill in missing pieces?of information on hourly load shapes, hydro dispatch history, and transactions for India and have not come up with anything yet. Would you know of any of the above information which would?assist us in our efforts? ? Thanks, ? David Yomogida ? ----- Original Message ----- From: David To: Sandeep Kohli Cc: Robert Schenck-Australia ; Vince J Kaminski ; Stinson Gibner Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: ENRON, India Database Sandeep, ? Below, I have summarized Henwood's work on the India database to date. ? The \"Inter_Regional Links.ppt\" file shows the topology and links between bubbles in the our model and \"Expand_India_Data_011000.xls\" details the existing station information that we have compiled to date.?Total resources closely match reported resources as shown in \"L&R_0110.xls\". Reported India total in 1997 is 86,000 MW and that in the Henwood database is 84,000 MW through 1997. ? Region \t \t \tEMSS database \t\t \t\t \t\tReported [1] \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\tDifference \t\t\t India total \t \t \t84,103 \t\t \t\t \t\t86,120 \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\t2,017 \t\t\t ? ? We are currently working on the development of hourly load shaping, seasonal hydro energy allocation, and the gathering of transaction information. Sandeep, we will try to contact you tomorrow (Thursday -- Australia?or Wednesday -- United States) to answer any questions that you may have on this information. ? Sincerely, ? David Yomogida ? ?", "row": 224, "chroma:document": "allocation, and the gathering of transaction information. Sandeep, we will try to contact you tomorrow (Thursday -- Australia?or Wednesday -- United States) to answer any questions that you may have on this information. ? Sincerely, ? David Yomogida ? ?"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: f4000e54-9589-4a53-86ee-d04cb9a3bdda
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf Sandeep, ? We've?completed a review?this morning to try to fill in missing pieces?of information on hourly load shapes, hydro dispatch history, and transactions for India and have not come up with anything yet. Would you know of any of the above information which would?assist us in our efforts? ? Thanks, ? David Yomogida ? ----- Original Message ----- From: David To: Sandeep Kohli Cc: Robert Schenck-Australia ; Vince J Kaminski ; Stinson Gibner Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: ENRON, India Database Sandeep, ? Below, I have summarized Henwood's work on the India database to date. ? The \"Inter_Regional Links.ppt\" file shows the topology and links between bubbles in the our model and \"Expand_India_Data_011000.xls\" details the existing station information that we have compiled to date.?Total resources closely match reported resources as shown in \"L&R_0110.xls\". Reported India total in 1997 is 86,000 MW and that in the Henwood database is 84,000 MW through 1997. ? Region \t \t \tEMSS database \t\t \t\t \t\tReported [1] \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\tDifference \t\t\t India total \t \t \t84,103 \t\t \t\t \t\t86,120 \t\t\t \t\t\t \t\t\t2,017 \t\t\t ? ? We are currently working on the development of hourly load shaping, seasonal hydro energy allocation, and the gathering of transaction information. Sandeep, we will try to contact you tomorrow (Thursday -- Australia?or Wednesday -- United States) to answer any questions that you may have on this information. ? Sincerely, ? David Yomogida ? ?", "row": 224, "chroma:document": "length: 1485\nlabels: kaminski-v/all_documents/2197. Message-ID: <32849512.1075856235348.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:24:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 5d69bec7-5afc-4729-9306-bcfdef7946c7
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sshackle.nsf PRC Meetings begin on Monday, November 20th. If you have not already done so, please go in to PEP at and complete the requests for feedback on the employees listed below. If you have any questions, please call the PEP Help Desk at: Houston: 1-713-853-4777, Option 4 London: 44-207-783-4040, Option 4 E-mail: perfmgmt@enron.com Thank you for your participation. ABRAMS, CLEMENT O BAILEY, SUSAN S BOYD, SAMANTHA BRUCE, ROBERT COOK, MARY H FREELAND, CLINT C GARCIA, JORGE A MURPHY, MELISSA A PANUS, STEPHANIE ST. CLAIR, CAROL L", "row": 225, "chroma:document": "file: shackleton-s/notes_inbox/310."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: a894569a-7770-48d9-b73c-98ac99377473
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sshackle.nsf PRC Meetings begin on Monday, November 20th. If you have not already done so, please go in to PEP at and complete the requests for feedback on the employees listed below. If you have any questions, please call the PEP Help Desk at: Houston: 1-713-853-4777, Option 4 London: 44-207-783-4040, Option 4 E-mail: perfmgmt@enron.com Thank you for your participation. ABRAMS, CLEMENT O BAILEY, SUSAN S BOYD, SAMANTHA BRUCE, ROBERT COOK, MARY H FREELAND, CLINT C GARCIA, JORGE A MURPHY, MELISSA A PANUS, STEPHANIE ST. CLAIR, CAROL L", "row": 225, "chroma:document": "message: sshackle.nsf PRC Meetings begin on Monday, November 20th. If you have not already done so, please go in to PEP at and complete the requests for feedback on the employees listed below. If you have any questions, please call the PEP Help Desk at: Houston: 1-713-853-4777, Option 4 London: 44-207-783-4040, Option 4 E-mail: perfmgmt@enron.com Thank you for your participation. ABRAMS, CLEMENT O BAILEY, SUSAN S BOYD, SAMANTHA BRUCE, ROBERT COOK, MARY H FREELAND, CLINT C GARCIA, JORGE A MURPHY, MELISSA A"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 14c30848-a0f3-4c97-8358-67e9adea1aa6
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sshackle.nsf PRC Meetings begin on Monday, November 20th. If you have not already done so, please go in to PEP at and complete the requests for feedback on the employees listed below. If you have any questions, please call the PEP Help Desk at: Houston: 1-713-853-4777, Option 4 London: 44-207-783-4040, Option 4 E-mail: perfmgmt@enron.com Thank you for your participation. ABRAMS, CLEMENT O BAILEY, SUSAN S BOYD, SAMANTHA BRUCE, ROBERT COOK, MARY H FREELAND, CLINT C GARCIA, JORGE A MURPHY, MELISSA A PANUS, STEPHANIE ST. CLAIR, CAROL L", "row": 225, "chroma:document": "S BOYD, SAMANTHA BRUCE, ROBERT COOK, MARY H FREELAND, CLINT C GARCIA, JORGE A MURPHY, MELISSA A PANUS, STEPHANIE ST. CLAIR, CAROL L"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: c2b0eb96-199a-4df1-b85a-93114a68e4e7
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sshackle.nsf PRC Meetings begin on Monday, November 20th. If you have not already done so, please go in to PEP at and complete the requests for feedback on the employees listed below. If you have any questions, please call the PEP Help Desk at: Houston: 1-713-853-4777, Option 4 London: 44-207-783-4040, Option 4 E-mail: perfmgmt@enron.com Thank you for your participation. ABRAMS, CLEMENT O BAILEY, SUSAN S BOYD, SAMANTHA BRUCE, ROBERT COOK, MARY H FREELAND, CLINT C GARCIA, JORGE A MURPHY, MELISSA A PANUS, STEPHANIE ST. CLAIR, CAROL L", "row": 225, "chroma:document": "length: 538\nlabels: shackleton-s/notes_inbox/310. Message-ID: <32187360.1075844471181.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 12:12:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 9a431f79-9b82-4a7d-96e8-51d1c373d94a
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sbeck.nsf Sally, at the beginning of the new year, you expressed your desire to have a report developed which captured all new hires for Energy Operations weekly. This report needed to include all transfers in and out of Energy Operations as well. After speaking to Alexus about your request, she had indicated that she may have a report already developed to meet your needs. I encouraged her to speak to you regarding any additional details that that may be needed. Alexus agreed to follow up to further assess your needs. Please let me know how I may help with the process.", "row": 226, "chroma:document": "file: beck-s/discussion_threads/668."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 7c7e8e89-3f59-4828-84d2-d6bd8535eb33
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sbeck.nsf Sally, at the beginning of the new year, you expressed your desire to have a report developed which captured all new hires for Energy Operations weekly. This report needed to include all transfers in and out of Energy Operations as well. After speaking to Alexus about your request, she had indicated that she may have a report already developed to meet your needs. I encouraged her to speak to you regarding any additional details that that may be needed. Alexus agreed to follow up to further assess your needs. Please let me know how I may help with the process.", "row": 226, "chroma:document": "message: sbeck.nsf Sally, at the beginning of the new year, you expressed your desire to have a report developed which captured all new hires for Energy Operations weekly. This report needed to include all transfers in and out of Energy Operations as well. After speaking to Alexus about your request, she had indicated that she may have a report already developed to meet your needs. I encouraged her to speak to you regarding any additional details that that may be needed. Alexus agreed to follow up to"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: bc6e2ff7-2bdb-44d9-8660-cc2c403c517e
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sbeck.nsf Sally, at the beginning of the new year, you expressed your desire to have a report developed which captured all new hires for Energy Operations weekly. This report needed to include all transfers in and out of Energy Operations as well. After speaking to Alexus about your request, she had indicated that she may have a report already developed to meet your needs. I encouraged her to speak to you regarding any additional details that that may be needed. Alexus agreed to follow up to further assess your needs. Please let me know how I may help with the process.", "row": 226, "chroma:document": "to you regarding any additional details that that may be needed. Alexus agreed to follow up to further assess your needs. Please let me know how I may help with the process."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: daea9764-6c0e-4562-9f26-beb7cbb57e07
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sbeck.nsf Sally, at the beginning of the new year, you expressed your desire to have a report developed which captured all new hires for Energy Operations weekly. This report needed to include all transfers in and out of Energy Operations as well. After speaking to Alexus about your request, she had indicated that she may have a report already developed to meet your needs. I encouraged her to speak to you regarding any additional details that that may be needed. Alexus agreed to follow up to further assess your needs. Please let me know how I may help with the process.", "row": 226, "chroma:document": "length: 576\nlabels: beck-s/discussion_threads/668. Message-ID: <22134754.1075855823288.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 04:06:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 77333296-ffeb-4863-b70c-14ca4ba968dc
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " brogers.nsf Ben, here are the new numbers (much more favorable). Give me a call if you want to discuss them. Yvan 34292", "row": 227, "chroma:document": "file: rogers-b/teco/5.\nmessage: brogers.nsf Ben, here are the new numbers (much more favorable). Give me a call if you want to discuss them. Yvan 34292\nlength: 120\nlabels: rogers-b/teco/5. Message-ID: <1700649.1075857289470.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 02:08:00 -0700 (PDT)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 25e028a3-367f-43f4-84e7-1cbc4e3649e3
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " eric linder 6-28-02.nsf Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 10; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\\Portland\\WestDesk\\California Scheduling\\ISO Final Schedules\\2001040710.txt ---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ECTRT MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT ENGY_TYPE: FIRM ---- SC Trades Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EPMI MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TRADING_SC: NCPA PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26 SCHED_TYPE: ENGY PURCH_SALE: 2 DEAL_NO: 1 ", "row": 228, "chroma:document": "file: linder-e/all_documents/254."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: c44ab44b-e14a-4960-b4a7-1372d46af82b
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " eric linder 6-28-02.nsf Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 10; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\\Portland\\WestDesk\\California Scheduling\\ISO Final Schedules\\2001040710.txt ---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ECTRT MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT ENGY_TYPE: FIRM ---- SC Trades Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EPMI MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TRADING_SC: NCPA PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26 SCHED_TYPE: ENGY PURCH_SALE: 2 DEAL_NO: 1 ", "row": 228, "chroma:document": "message: eric linder 6-28-02.nsf Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 10; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\\Portland\\WestDesk\\California Scheduling\\ISO Final Schedules\\2001040710.txt ---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ECTRT MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT ENGY_TYPE: FIRM ---- SC Trades Schedule ---- * Final"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: ca38fc52-c748-402f-91fe-75961b4ea9a4
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " eric linder 6-28-02.nsf Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 10; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\\Portland\\WestDesk\\California Scheduling\\ISO Final Schedules\\2001040710.txt ---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ECTRT MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT ENGY_TYPE: FIRM ---- SC Trades Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EPMI MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TRADING_SC: NCPA PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26 SCHED_TYPE: ENGY PURCH_SALE: 2 DEAL_NO: 1 ", "row": 228, "chroma:document": "FCORNR_5_PSUEDO INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT ENGY_TYPE: FIRM ---- SC Trades Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EPMI MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TRADING_SC: NCPA PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26 SCHED_TYPE: ENGY PURCH_SALE: 2 DEAL_NO: 1"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 4ab67a52-b1cd-497f-866b-f496d1d1d140
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " eric linder 6-28-02.nsf Start Date: 4/7/01; HourAhead hour: 10; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\\Portland\\WestDesk\\California Scheduling\\ISO Final Schedules\\2001040710.txt ---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ECTRT MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT ENGY_TYPE: FIRM ---- SC Trades Schedule ---- * Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EPMI MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/7/01 TRADING_SC: NCPA PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26 SCHED_TYPE: ENGY PURCH_SALE: 2 DEAL_NO: 1 ", "row": 228, "chroma:document": "length: 692\nlabels: linder-e/all_documents/254. Message-ID: <7819118.1075841003016.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:41:00 -0700 (PDT)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 9c8d855d-754c-4667-aa9f-05ff55435b9a
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylo1 (Non-Privileged).pst Killians \t\t\t\t\t", "row": 229, "chroma:document": "file: taylor-m/contacts/19.\nmessage: mtaylo1 (Non-Privileged).pst Killians\nlength: 44\nlabels: taylor-m/contacts/19. Message-ID: <20062039.1075859397270.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:02:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: b3e9b737-e363-4749-932e-b80995d2e10f
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " jderric.nsf Please let Marc Manly know of any relationship your group has with the firm mentioned below. Thank you. JIm ---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 07:21 PM --------------------------- Marc Manly@EES 12/07/2000 12:14 PM To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Joe Halprin/TNPC/EES@EES Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Jim: please see the attached, from Joe Halprin. Does the Enron family have any relationships with the Klett Rooney law firm that we should bring to their attention? In all events, please be aware that they are taking a particularly adverse position. Thanks. Marc ---------------------- Forwarded by Marc Manly/HOU/EES on 12/07/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- From: Joe Halprin on 12/07/2000 11:08 AM CST To: Marc Manly/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Marc: In connection with a dispute regarding a commercial arrangement between NewPower and Campus Dimensions, Inc. (also known as College Credit Card Corporation), Campus Dimensions, Inc. (\"CDI\") has engaged the law firm Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling - headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA - to represent them against NewPower. Klett Rooney has conducted themselves in a fashion that I would consider to be particularly unreasonable. I would like to know if Enron has a relationship with Klett Rooney or CDI. If they do, I would recommend that the firm be removed from further engagements. Thanks. Joe Halprin The New Power Company 10 Glenville Street Greenwich, CT 06831 p: 203-531-0400 f: 203-513-0404 e: jhalprin@newpower.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at the Internet address indicated or by telephone at (203) 531-0400. Thank you. ", "row": 230, "chroma:document": "file: derrick-j/discussion_threads/100."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 37b0e451-2be9-4387-b756-2c0012ce5562
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " jderric.nsf Please let Marc Manly know of any relationship your group has with the firm mentioned below. Thank you. JIm ---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 07:21 PM --------------------------- Marc Manly@EES 12/07/2000 12:14 PM To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Joe Halprin/TNPC/EES@EES Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Jim: please see the attached, from Joe Halprin. Does the Enron family have any relationships with the Klett Rooney law firm that we should bring to their attention? In all events, please be aware that they are taking a particularly adverse position. Thanks. Marc ---------------------- Forwarded by Marc Manly/HOU/EES on 12/07/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- From: Joe Halprin on 12/07/2000 11:08 AM CST To: Marc Manly/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Marc: In connection with a dispute regarding a commercial arrangement between NewPower and Campus Dimensions, Inc. (also known as College Credit Card Corporation), Campus Dimensions, Inc. (\"CDI\") has engaged the law firm Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling - headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA - to represent them against NewPower. Klett Rooney has conducted themselves in a fashion that I would consider to be particularly unreasonable. I would like to know if Enron has a relationship with Klett Rooney or CDI. If they do, I would recommend that the firm be removed from further engagements. Thanks. Joe Halprin The New Power Company 10 Glenville Street Greenwich, CT 06831 p: 203-531-0400 f: 203-513-0404 e: jhalprin@newpower.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at the Internet address indicated or by telephone at (203) 531-0400. Thank you. ", "row": 230, "chroma:document": "message: jderric.nsf Please let Marc Manly know of any relationship your group has with the firm mentioned below. Thank you. JIm ---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 07:21 PM --------------------------- Marc Manly@EES 12/07/2000 12:14 PM To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Joe Halprin/TNPC/EES@EES Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Jim: please see the attached, from Joe Halprin. Does the Enron family have any relationships with the Klett Rooney law firm that we"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 186e490d-3928-427b-8aa3-6ae410e960e8
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " jderric.nsf Please let Marc Manly know of any relationship your group has with the firm mentioned below. Thank you. JIm ---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 07:21 PM --------------------------- Marc Manly@EES 12/07/2000 12:14 PM To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Joe Halprin/TNPC/EES@EES Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Jim: please see the attached, from Joe Halprin. Does the Enron family have any relationships with the Klett Rooney law firm that we should bring to their attention? In all events, please be aware that they are taking a particularly adverse position. Thanks. Marc ---------------------- Forwarded by Marc Manly/HOU/EES on 12/07/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- From: Joe Halprin on 12/07/2000 11:08 AM CST To: Marc Manly/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Marc: In connection with a dispute regarding a commercial arrangement between NewPower and Campus Dimensions, Inc. (also known as College Credit Card Corporation), Campus Dimensions, Inc. (\"CDI\") has engaged the law firm Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling - headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA - to represent them against NewPower. Klett Rooney has conducted themselves in a fashion that I would consider to be particularly unreasonable. I would like to know if Enron has a relationship with Klett Rooney or CDI. If they do, I would recommend that the firm be removed from further engagements. Thanks. Joe Halprin The New Power Company 10 Glenville Street Greenwich, CT 06831 p: 203-531-0400 f: 203-513-0404 e: jhalprin@newpower.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at the Internet address indicated or by telephone at (203) 531-0400. Thank you. ", "row": 230, "chroma:document": "Joe Halprin. Does the Enron family have any relationships with the Klett Rooney law firm that we should bring to their attention? In all events, please be aware that they are taking a particularly adverse position. Thanks. Marc ---------------------- Forwarded by Marc Manly/HOU/EES on 12/07/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- From: Joe Halprin on 12/07/2000 11:08 AM CST To: Marc Manly/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Marc: In connection with a dispute regarding a commercial"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 19f1b95b-158b-4b6c-bd57-cff35012c5e1
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " jderric.nsf Please let Marc Manly know of any relationship your group has with the firm mentioned below. Thank you. JIm ---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 07:21 PM --------------------------- Marc Manly@EES 12/07/2000 12:14 PM To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Joe Halprin/TNPC/EES@EES Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Jim: please see the attached, from Joe Halprin. Does the Enron family have any relationships with the Klett Rooney law firm that we should bring to their attention? In all events, please be aware that they are taking a particularly adverse position. Thanks. Marc ---------------------- Forwarded by Marc Manly/HOU/EES on 12/07/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- From: Joe Halprin on 12/07/2000 11:08 AM CST To: Marc Manly/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Marc: In connection with a dispute regarding a commercial arrangement between NewPower and Campus Dimensions, Inc. (also known as College Credit Card Corporation), Campus Dimensions, Inc. (\"CDI\") has engaged the law firm Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling - headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA - to represent them against NewPower. Klett Rooney has conducted themselves in a fashion that I would consider to be particularly unreasonable. I would like to know if Enron has a relationship with Klett Rooney or CDI. If they do, I would recommend that the firm be removed from further engagements. Thanks. Joe Halprin The New Power Company 10 Glenville Street Greenwich, CT 06831 p: 203-531-0400 f: 203-513-0404 e: jhalprin@newpower.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at the Internet address indicated or by telephone at (203) 531-0400. Thank you. ", "row": 230, "chroma:document": "Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Marc: In connection with a dispute regarding a commercial arrangement between NewPower and Campus Dimensions, Inc. (also known as College Credit Card Corporation), Campus Dimensions, Inc. (\"CDI\") has engaged the law firm Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling - headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA - to represent them against NewPower. Klett Rooney has conducted themselves in a fashion that I would consider to be particularly unreasonable. I would like to know if Enron has a"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: d500a127-827b-4a70-90dd-a38aa58552cc
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " jderric.nsf Please let Marc Manly know of any relationship your group has with the firm mentioned below. Thank you. JIm ---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 07:21 PM --------------------------- Marc Manly@EES 12/07/2000 12:14 PM To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Joe Halprin/TNPC/EES@EES Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Jim: please see the attached, from Joe Halprin. Does the Enron family have any relationships with the Klett Rooney law firm that we should bring to their attention? In all events, please be aware that they are taking a particularly adverse position. Thanks. Marc ---------------------- Forwarded by Marc Manly/HOU/EES on 12/07/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- From: Joe Halprin on 12/07/2000 11:08 AM CST To: Marc Manly/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Marc: In connection with a dispute regarding a commercial arrangement between NewPower and Campus Dimensions, Inc. (also known as College Credit Card Corporation), Campus Dimensions, Inc. (\"CDI\") has engaged the law firm Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling - headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA - to represent them against NewPower. Klett Rooney has conducted themselves in a fashion that I would consider to be particularly unreasonable. I would like to know if Enron has a relationship with Klett Rooney or CDI. If they do, I would recommend that the firm be removed from further engagements. Thanks. Joe Halprin The New Power Company 10 Glenville Street Greenwich, CT 06831 p: 203-531-0400 f: 203-513-0404 e: jhalprin@newpower.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at the Internet address indicated or by telephone at (203) 531-0400. Thank you. ", "row": 230, "chroma:document": "fashion that I would consider to be particularly unreasonable. I would like to know if Enron has a relationship with Klett Rooney or CDI. If they do, I would recommend that the firm be removed from further engagements. Thanks. Joe Halprin The New Power Company 10 Glenville Street Greenwich, CT 06831 p: 203-531-0400 f: 203-513-0404 e: jhalprin@newpower.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 42dd86cd-b7b6-4e6d-8d2b-1117a895af43
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " jderric.nsf Please let Marc Manly know of any relationship your group has with the firm mentioned below. Thank you. JIm ---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 07:21 PM --------------------------- Marc Manly@EES 12/07/2000 12:14 PM To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Joe Halprin/TNPC/EES@EES Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Jim: please see the attached, from Joe Halprin. Does the Enron family have any relationships with the Klett Rooney law firm that we should bring to their attention? In all events, please be aware that they are taking a particularly adverse position. Thanks. Marc ---------------------- Forwarded by Marc Manly/HOU/EES on 12/07/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- From: Joe Halprin on 12/07/2000 11:08 AM CST To: Marc Manly/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Marc: In connection with a dispute regarding a commercial arrangement between NewPower and Campus Dimensions, Inc. (also known as College Credit Card Corporation), Campus Dimensions, Inc. (\"CDI\") has engaged the law firm Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling - headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA - to represent them against NewPower. Klett Rooney has conducted themselves in a fashion that I would consider to be particularly unreasonable. I would like to know if Enron has a relationship with Klett Rooney or CDI. If they do, I would recommend that the firm be removed from further engagements. Thanks. Joe Halprin The New Power Company 10 Glenville Street Greenwich, CT 06831 p: 203-531-0400 f: 203-513-0404 e: jhalprin@newpower.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at the Internet address indicated or by telephone at (203) 531-0400. Thank you. ", "row": 230, "chroma:document": "accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at the Internet address indicated or by telephone at (203) 531-0400. Thank you."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: feb930c7-73a0-4a8a-8f75-561dc94f3882
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " jderric.nsf Please let Marc Manly know of any relationship your group has with the firm mentioned below. Thank you. JIm ---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 07:21 PM --------------------------- Marc Manly@EES 12/07/2000 12:14 PM To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Joe Halprin/TNPC/EES@EES Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Jim: please see the attached, from Joe Halprin. Does the Enron family have any relationships with the Klett Rooney law firm that we should bring to their attention? In all events, please be aware that they are taking a particularly adverse position. Thanks. Marc ---------------------- Forwarded by Marc Manly/HOU/EES on 12/07/2000 01:09 PM --------------------------- From: Joe Halprin on 12/07/2000 11:08 AM CST To: Marc Manly/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Outside Counsel - Klett Rooney Marc: In connection with a dispute regarding a commercial arrangement between NewPower and Campus Dimensions, Inc. (also known as College Credit Card Corporation), Campus Dimensions, Inc. (\"CDI\") has engaged the law firm Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling - headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA - to represent them against NewPower. Klett Rooney has conducted themselves in a fashion that I would consider to be particularly unreasonable. I would like to know if Enron has a relationship with Klett Rooney or CDI. If they do, I would recommend that the firm be removed from further engagements. Thanks. Joe Halprin The New Power Company 10 Glenville Street Greenwich, CT 06831 p: 203-531-0400 f: 203-513-0404 e: jhalprin@newpower.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at the Internet address indicated or by telephone at (203) 531-0400. Thank you. ", "row": 230, "chroma:document": "length: 2091\nlabels: derrick-j/discussion_threads/100. Message-ID: <9002037.1075842921691.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:24:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 3927333e-7935-4a9f-bfcf-cc3224afa855
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kmann.nsf This is who Sheila suggested. The deal I'm working on is an asset management/control area services transaction. It will be an odd one, so I'm not expecting someone to have specific expertise. I need help on the general contracting under Miss law stuff, especially since there are some quirks involved. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 11:01 AM --------------------------- From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 03/05/2001 09:31 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, PLLC 1400 Trustmark Building, 248 East Capitol Street, P.O. Drawer 119 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 (Hinds Co.) Telephone: 601-948-3101 Facsimile: 601-960-6902 Web Site: ? Walker L. Watters is his complete name. \tKay Mann@ENRON \t03/04/2001 02:13 PM \t\t \t\t To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Please find his contact information for me. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/04/2001 02:12 PM --------------------------- From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/02/2001 05:15 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Walker Waters at the Brunini law firm. ", "row": 231, "chroma:document": "file: mann-k/_sent_mail/1447."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 8cbc929e-ce94-4798-b73d-c275424da1a4
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kmann.nsf This is who Sheila suggested. The deal I'm working on is an asset management/control area services transaction. It will be an odd one, so I'm not expecting someone to have specific expertise. I need help on the general contracting under Miss law stuff, especially since there are some quirks involved. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 11:01 AM --------------------------- From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 03/05/2001 09:31 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, PLLC 1400 Trustmark Building, 248 East Capitol Street, P.O. Drawer 119 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 (Hinds Co.) Telephone: 601-948-3101 Facsimile: 601-960-6902 Web Site: ? Walker L. Watters is his complete name. \tKay Mann@ENRON \t03/04/2001 02:13 PM \t\t \t\t To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Please find his contact information for me. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/04/2001 02:12 PM --------------------------- From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/02/2001 05:15 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Walker Waters at the Brunini law firm. ", "row": 231, "chroma:document": "message: kmann.nsf This is who Sheila suggested. The deal I'm working on is an asset management/control area services transaction. It will be an odd one, so I'm not expecting someone to have specific expertise. I need help on the general contracting under Miss law stuff, especially since there are some quirks involved. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 11:01 AM --------------------------- From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 03/05/2001"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 9f4c066c-3c71-4071-a113-64e5e3400722
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kmann.nsf This is who Sheila suggested. The deal I'm working on is an asset management/control area services transaction. It will be an odd one, so I'm not expecting someone to have specific expertise. I need help on the general contracting under Miss law stuff, especially since there are some quirks involved. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 11:01 AM --------------------------- From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 03/05/2001 09:31 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, PLLC 1400 Trustmark Building, 248 East Capitol Street, P.O. Drawer 119 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 (Hinds Co.) Telephone: 601-948-3101 Facsimile: 601-960-6902 Web Site: ? Walker L. Watters is his complete name. \tKay Mann@ENRON \t03/04/2001 02:13 PM \t\t \t\t To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Please find his contact information for me. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/04/2001 02:12 PM --------------------------- From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/02/2001 05:15 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Walker Waters at the Brunini law firm. ", "row": 231, "chroma:document": "on 03/06/2001 11:01 AM --------------------------- From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 03/05/2001 09:31 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, PLLC 1400 Trustmark Building, 248 East Capitol Street, P.O. Drawer 119 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 (Hinds Co.) Telephone: 601-948-3101 Facsimile: 601-960-6902 Web Site: ? Walker L. Watters is his complete name. \tKay Mann@ENRON \t03/04/2001 02:13 PM \t\t \t\t To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Re:"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 48fb348c-5503-4d9b-91c5-9fc778604b73
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kmann.nsf This is who Sheila suggested. The deal I'm working on is an asset management/control area services transaction. It will be an odd one, so I'm not expecting someone to have specific expertise. I need help on the general contracting under Miss law stuff, especially since there are some quirks involved. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 11:01 AM --------------------------- From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 03/05/2001 09:31 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, PLLC 1400 Trustmark Building, 248 East Capitol Street, P.O. Drawer 119 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 (Hinds Co.) Telephone: 601-948-3101 Facsimile: 601-960-6902 Web Site: ? Walker L. Watters is his complete name. \tKay Mann@ENRON \t03/04/2001 02:13 PM \t\t \t\t To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Please find his contact information for me. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/04/2001 02:12 PM --------------------------- From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/02/2001 05:15 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Walker Waters at the Brunini law firm. ", "row": 231, "chroma:document": "Kay Mann@ENRON \t03/04/2001 02:13 PM \t\t \t\t To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Please find his contact information for me. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/04/2001 02:12 PM --------------------------- From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/02/2001 05:15 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Walker Waters at the Brunini law firm."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 5dcd739b-687d-4127-a47a-bc9e603322a4
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kmann.nsf This is who Sheila suggested. The deal I'm working on is an asset management/control area services transaction. It will be an odd one, so I'm not expecting someone to have specific expertise. I need help on the general contracting under Miss law stuff, especially since there are some quirks involved. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 11:01 AM --------------------------- From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 03/05/2001 09:31 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, PLLC 1400 Trustmark Building, 248 East Capitol Street, P.O. Drawer 119 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 (Hinds Co.) Telephone: 601-948-3101 Facsimile: 601-960-6902 Web Site: ? Walker L. Watters is his complete name. \tKay Mann@ENRON \t03/04/2001 02:13 PM \t\t \t\t To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Please find his contact information for me. Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/04/2001 02:12 PM --------------------------- From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/02/2001 05:15 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mississippi lawyer Walker Waters at the Brunini law firm. ", "row": 231, "chroma:document": "length: 1252\nlabels: mann-k/_sent_mail/1447. Message-ID: <8430758.1075846063678.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 02:57:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 88860fb5-0b34-4958-9c85-b8497e17ec5a
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf Yes, why don't you send the insurance information to us. We have received three quotes from the local man representing the company who is handling my new 401K plan. We could compareall of them and then talk to you about it. How does that sound? How much information is there? Would it be too much to fax? If not, you could fax it to my work number on Friday when I am there. I don't have the fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We got a little more snow yesterday, but nothing compared to what Phyllis and Tim both must have gotten! I guess they are setting records for North Carolina. It surely is cold here, though. I had to go downtown today and the wind blowing up and down the streets between the buildings was really bitter. Three international flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room hotel! There go our ticket prices up again! Love, Mother On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0600 \"Mark Taylor\" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> writes: > > >Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts >of spaces - >grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we had >in >Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me. > >And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report >is the >system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. >It's kind of >exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have >to really >make it work! > >I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, >pre-tax vs. >after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you >want me to >send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst? > >Love, Mark > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.", "row": 232, "chroma:document": "file: taylor-m/archive/1_00/19."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 7b039761-67b5-4104-a58a-05f99dc67b4d
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf Yes, why don't you send the insurance information to us. We have received three quotes from the local man representing the company who is handling my new 401K plan. We could compareall of them and then talk to you about it. How does that sound? How much information is there? Would it be too much to fax? If not, you could fax it to my work number on Friday when I am there. I don't have the fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We got a little more snow yesterday, but nothing compared to what Phyllis and Tim both must have gotten! I guess they are setting records for North Carolina. It surely is cold here, though. I had to go downtown today and the wind blowing up and down the streets between the buildings was really bitter. Three international flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room hotel! There go our ticket prices up again! Love, Mother On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0600 \"Mark Taylor\" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> writes: > > >Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts >of spaces - >grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we had >in >Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me. > >And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report >is the >system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. >It's kind of >exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have >to really >make it work! > >I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, >pre-tax vs. >after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you >want me to >send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst? > >Love, Mark > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.", "row": 232, "chroma:document": "message: mtaylor.nsf Yes, why don't you send the insurance information to us. We have received three quotes from the local man representing the company who is handling my new 401K plan. We could compareall of them and then talk to you about it. How does that sound? How much information is there? Would it be too much to fax? If not, you could fax it to my work number on Friday when I am there. I don't have the fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 8c827479-0039-4f6d-980a-dacd1de40846
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf Yes, why don't you send the insurance information to us. We have received three quotes from the local man representing the company who is handling my new 401K plan. We could compareall of them and then talk to you about it. How does that sound? How much information is there? Would it be too much to fax? If not, you could fax it to my work number on Friday when I am there. I don't have the fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We got a little more snow yesterday, but nothing compared to what Phyllis and Tim both must have gotten! I guess they are setting records for North Carolina. It surely is cold here, though. I had to go downtown today and the wind blowing up and down the streets between the buildings was really bitter. Three international flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room hotel! There go our ticket prices up again! Love, Mother On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0600 \"Mark Taylor\" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> writes: > > >Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts >of spaces - >grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we had >in >Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me. > >And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report >is the >system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. >It's kind of >exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have >to really >make it work! > >I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, >pre-tax vs. >after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you >want me to >send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst? > >Love, Mark > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.", "row": 232, "chroma:document": "fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We got a little more snow yesterday, but nothing compared to what Phyllis and Tim both must have gotten! I guess they are setting records for North Carolina. It surely is cold here, though. I had to go downtown today and the wind blowing up and down the streets between the buildings was really bitter. Three international flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 4c3f9b82-4d2c-4bc6-b065-25ec9a4c2413
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf Yes, why don't you send the insurance information to us. We have received three quotes from the local man representing the company who is handling my new 401K plan. We could compareall of them and then talk to you about it. How does that sound? How much information is there? Would it be too much to fax? If not, you could fax it to my work number on Friday when I am there. I don't have the fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We got a little more snow yesterday, but nothing compared to what Phyllis and Tim both must have gotten! I guess they are setting records for North Carolina. It surely is cold here, though. I had to go downtown today and the wind blowing up and down the streets between the buildings was really bitter. Three international flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room hotel! There go our ticket prices up again! Love, Mother On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0600 \"Mark Taylor\" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> writes: > > >Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts >of spaces - >grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we had >in >Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me. > >And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report >is the >system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. >It's kind of >exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have >to really >make it work! > >I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, >pre-tax vs. >after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you >want me to >send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst? > >Love, Mark > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.", "row": 232, "chroma:document": "flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room hotel! There go our ticket prices up again! Love, Mother On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0600 \"Mark Taylor\" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> writes: > > >Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts >of spaces - >grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we had >in >Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: bf6972e6-098f-447b-9c5b-2d355c9fb187
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf Yes, why don't you send the insurance information to us. We have received three quotes from the local man representing the company who is handling my new 401K plan. We could compareall of them and then talk to you about it. How does that sound? How much information is there? Would it be too much to fax? If not, you could fax it to my work number on Friday when I am there. I don't have the fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We got a little more snow yesterday, but nothing compared to what Phyllis and Tim both must have gotten! I guess they are setting records for North Carolina. It surely is cold here, though. I had to go downtown today and the wind blowing up and down the streets between the buildings was really bitter. Three international flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room hotel! There go our ticket prices up again! Love, Mother On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0600 \"Mark Taylor\" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> writes: > > >Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts >of spaces - >grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we had >in >Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me. > >And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report >is the >system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. >It's kind of >exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have >to really >make it work! > >I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, >pre-tax vs. >after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you >want me to >send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst? > >Love, Mark > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.", "row": 232, "chroma:document": "to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me. > >And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report >is the >system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. >It's kind of >exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have >to really >make it work! > >I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: dcda9f02-7fd4-4a58-bd5f-8960d4c1055d
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf Yes, why don't you send the insurance information to us. We have received three quotes from the local man representing the company who is handling my new 401K plan. We could compareall of them and then talk to you about it. How does that sound? How much information is there? Would it be too much to fax? If not, you could fax it to my work number on Friday when I am there. I don't have the fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We got a little more snow yesterday, but nothing compared to what Phyllis and Tim both must have gotten! I guess they are setting records for North Carolina. It surely is cold here, though. I had to go downtown today and the wind blowing up and down the streets between the buildings was really bitter. Three international flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room hotel! There go our ticket prices up again! Love, Mother On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0600 \"Mark Taylor\" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> writes: > > >Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts >of spaces - >grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we had >in >Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me. > >And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report >is the >system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. >It's kind of >exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have >to really >make it work! > >I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, >pre-tax vs. >after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you >want me to >send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst? > >Love, Mark > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.", "row": 232, "chroma:document": "on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, >pre-tax vs. >after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you >want me to >send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst? > >Love, Mark > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 2f6d4b38-8fed-4b0e-9571-07eea91b197a
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf Yes, why don't you send the insurance information to us. We have received three quotes from the local man representing the company who is handling my new 401K plan. We could compareall of them and then talk to you about it. How does that sound? How much information is there? Would it be too much to fax? If not, you could fax it to my work number on Friday when I am there. I don't have the fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We got a little more snow yesterday, but nothing compared to what Phyllis and Tim both must have gotten! I guess they are setting records for North Carolina. It surely is cold here, though. I had to go downtown today and the wind blowing up and down the streets between the buildings was really bitter. Three international flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room hotel! There go our ticket prices up again! Love, Mother On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0600 \"Mark Taylor\" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> writes: > > >Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts >of spaces - >grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we had >in >Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me. > >And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report >is the >system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. >It's kind of >exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have >to really >make it work! > >I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, >pre-tax vs. >after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you >want me to >send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst? > >Love, Mark > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.", "row": 232, "chroma:document": "now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 3cd36ae5-74ff-459c-a47e-ded80414f5bf
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mtaylor.nsf Yes, why don't you send the insurance information to us. We have received three quotes from the local man representing the company who is handling my new 401K plan. We could compareall of them and then talk to you about it. How does that sound? How much information is there? Would it be too much to fax? If not, you could fax it to my work number on Friday when I am there. I don't have the fax number here at home, but I can call there tomorrow (Thursday,) get it and get back to you. We got a little more snow yesterday, but nothing compared to what Phyllis and Tim both must have gotten! I guess they are setting records for North Carolina. It surely is cold here, though. I had to go downtown today and the wind blowing up and down the streets between the buildings was really bitter. Three international flights bound for JFK had to land here and stay all night. Delta nearly filled a 500 room hotel! There go our ticket prices up again! Love, Mother On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0600 \"Mark Taylor\" <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com> writes: > > >Glad you liked them. Yes, cats do seem to like to explore all sorts >of spaces - >grocery bags are always a good bet. I remember Dusty, the cat we had >in >Bethesda, used to like to sleep at the foot of my bed - under the >covers. Go >figure. I'd be happy to send you acopy of the photo of me. > >And yes again, the online platform mentioned in the analyst's report >is the >system I've spent so much time on over the last nine months or so. >It's kind of >exciting to see a project in print like that but now it means we have >to really >make it work! > >I received the package from MetLife on the Long-Term Care insurance. >I had a >couple of questions which I called the company about (premiums, >pre-tax vs. >after tax, etc.) and would be happy to go over it with you. Do you >want me to >send the stuff to you or should we just chart about it frst? > >Love, Mark > > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.", "row": 232, "chroma:document": "length: 2167\nlabels: taylor-m/archive/1_00/19. Message-ID: <20316828.1075860215406.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 19:05:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 69b499db-53d4-41fb-aa50-0ffa29257c36
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins (Non-Privileged).pst This request has been pending approval for 15 days and you are the alternate. Please click to review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000078941 Approver : sandeep.kohli@enron.com Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:30:56 AM Requested For : punit.rawal@enron.com Resource Name : \\\\enehou\\houston\\common\\Research - [Read] Resource Type : Directory ", "row": 233, "chroma:document": "file: kaminski-v/inbox/154.\nmessage: vkamins (Non-Privileged).pst This request has been pending approval for 15 days and you are the alternate. Please click to review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000078941 Approver : sandeep.kohli@enron.com Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:30:56 AM Requested For : punit.rawal@enron.com Resource Name : \\\\enehou\\houston\\common\\Research - [Read] Resource Type : Directory\nlength: 387"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 16aa43dc-99c7-4791-a292-30f401317d6f
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins (Non-Privileged).pst This request has been pending approval for 15 days and you are the alternate. Please click to review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000078941 Approver : sandeep.kohli@enron.com Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:30:56 AM Requested For : punit.rawal@enron.com Resource Name : \\\\enehou\\houston\\common\\Research - [Read] Resource Type : Directory ", "row": 233, "chroma:document": "length: 387\nlabels: kaminski-v/inbox/154. Message-ID: <7097217.1075855468758.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:28:10 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 641391fc-c78d-4810-9390-d26b21179fef
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 11:08 AM --------------------------- Shirley Crenshaw 02/15/2001 09:05 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: I just like hearing it..... This is great! SAY IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN ! Clinton isn't president A man goes to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. The Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton isn't President any longer, please leave. The man goes away. The next day he comes back to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton is not the President any longer, please go away. The man goes away. The next day he comes back again, and again the same Marine is on duty. The man asks to see President Clinton and the Marine says, -- WHY DO YOU KEEP COMING HERE ASKING FOR HIM? CLINTON IS NOT PRESIDENT ANYMORE!!! The man smiles happily and says, \"I know, I just like hearing it.\" ", "row": 234, "chroma:document": "file: kaminski-v/all_documents/1503."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 4341ab6c-92ab-4059-960d-d0bb65f4fbd4
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 11:08 AM --------------------------- Shirley Crenshaw 02/15/2001 09:05 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: I just like hearing it..... This is great! SAY IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN ! Clinton isn't president A man goes to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. The Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton isn't President any longer, please leave. The man goes away. The next day he comes back to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton is not the President any longer, please go away. The man goes away. The next day he comes back again, and again the same Marine is on duty. The man asks to see President Clinton and the Marine says, -- WHY DO YOU KEEP COMING HERE ASKING FOR HIM? CLINTON IS NOT PRESIDENT ANYMORE!!! The man smiles happily and says, \"I know, I just like hearing it.\" ", "row": 234, "chroma:document": "message: vkamins.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 11:08 AM --------------------------- Shirley Crenshaw 02/15/2001 09:05 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: I just like hearing it..... This is great! SAY IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN ! Clinton isn't president A man goes to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. The Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton isn't President any longer, please leave. The man goes away. The next day he comes back"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 45bbd706-5db8-4d51-9d6b-25bfaaaaade0
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 11:08 AM --------------------------- Shirley Crenshaw 02/15/2001 09:05 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: I just like hearing it..... This is great! SAY IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN ! Clinton isn't president A man goes to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. The Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton isn't President any longer, please leave. The man goes away. The next day he comes back to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton is not the President any longer, please go away. The man goes away. The next day he comes back again, and again the same Marine is on duty. The man asks to see President Clinton and the Marine says, -- WHY DO YOU KEEP COMING HERE ASKING FOR HIM? CLINTON IS NOT PRESIDENT ANYMORE!!! The man smiles happily and says, \"I know, I just like hearing it.\" ", "row": 234, "chroma:document": "Clinton isn't President any longer, please leave. The man goes away. The next day he comes back to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton is not the President any longer, please go away. The man goes away. The next day he comes back again, and again the same Marine is on duty. The man asks to see President Clinton and the Marine says, -- WHY DO YOU KEEP COMING HERE ASKING FOR HIM? CLINTON IS NOT PRESIDENT ANYMORE!!! The man smiles happily and says, \"I"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 84029151-2ebf-4d6a-8871-9eb973e192ce
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 11:08 AM --------------------------- Shirley Crenshaw 02/15/2001 09:05 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: I just like hearing it..... This is great! SAY IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN ! Clinton isn't president A man goes to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. The Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton isn't President any longer, please leave. The man goes away. The next day he comes back to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton is not the President any longer, please go away. The man goes away. The next day he comes back again, and again the same Marine is on duty. The man asks to see President Clinton and the Marine says, -- WHY DO YOU KEEP COMING HERE ASKING FOR HIM? CLINTON IS NOT PRESIDENT ANYMORE!!! The man smiles happily and says, \"I know, I just like hearing it.\" ", "row": 234, "chroma:document": "COMING HERE ASKING FOR HIM? CLINTON IS NOT PRESIDENT ANYMORE!!! The man smiles happily and says, \"I know, I just like hearing it.\""}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 79791672-1723-4b4d-8418-eb6ee2c8e84a
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " vkamins.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 11:08 AM --------------------------- Shirley Crenshaw 02/15/2001 09:05 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: I just like hearing it..... This is great! SAY IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN ! Clinton isn't president A man goes to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. The Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton isn't President any longer, please leave. The man goes away. The next day he comes back to the White House and asks to see President Clinton. Marine on duty tells the guy that Clinton is not the President any longer, please go away. The man goes away. The next day he comes back again, and again the same Marine is on duty. The man asks to see President Clinton and the Marine says, -- WHY DO YOU KEEP COMING HERE ASKING FOR HIM? CLINTON IS NOT PRESIDENT ANYMORE!!! The man smiles happily and says, \"I know, I just like hearing it.\" ", "row": 234, "chroma:document": "length: 948\nlabels: kaminski-v/all_documents/1503. Message-ID: <1462624.1075856218335.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 03:08:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: d6e6fc9a-d6eb-432f-a0fb-bf73b2819483
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " eric bass 6-25-02.PST can you make reservations for 7:00 at beef and bird? thanks, e \"K. Bass\" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 04/04/2001 12:31:40 PM Please respond to \"K. Bass\" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> To:\tEric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com> cc:\t Subject:\tYes! Hi Eric, We would love to join you and Shanna for dinner. Let us know when and where. Look forward to it. LU-M ", "row": 235, "chroma:document": "file: bass-e/_sent_mail/41.\nmessage: eric bass 6-25-02.PST can you make reservations for 7:00 at beef and bird? thanks, e \"K. Bass\" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 04/04/2001 12:31:40 PM Please respond to \"K. Bass\" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> To:\tEric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com> cc:\t Subject:\tYes! Hi Eric, We would love to join you and Shanna for dinner. Let us know when and where. Look forward to it. LU-M\nlength: 370\nlabels: bass-e/_sent_mail/41. Message-ID: <11911470.1075840326760.JavaMail.evans@thyme>"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 39c7cf7c-308f-4b7c-9134-cd7d9b454098
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " eric bass 6-25-02.PST can you make reservations for 7:00 at beef and bird? thanks, e \"K. Bass\" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 04/04/2001 12:31:40 PM Please respond to \"K. Bass\" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> To:\tEric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com> cc:\t Subject:\tYes! Hi Eric, We would love to join you and Shanna for dinner. Let us know when and where. Look forward to it. LU-M ", "row": 235, "chroma:document": "length: 370\nlabels: bass-e/_sent_mail/41. Message-ID: <11911470.1075840326760.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:26:00 -0700 (PDT)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 1b66d55c-7c47-4d3f-8840-81bb9c48ccc4
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " cgerman.nsf I keep getting \"insufficient memory\" messages on my computer. And that's without running Dynegy Direct. The IT guy said I need one of the following 1. New super duper computer 2. More memory, my computer has 128meg of ram 3. Run my applications on 2 cmputers like mine instead of one.", "row": 236, "chroma:document": "file: germany-c/sent/1899.\nmessage: cgerman.nsf I keep getting \"insufficient memory\" messages on my computer. And that's without running Dynegy Direct. The IT guy said I need one of the following 1. New super duper computer 2. More memory, my computer has 128meg of ram 3. Run my applications on 2 cmputers like mine instead of one.\nlength: 297\nlabels: germany-c/sent/1899. Message-ID: <21141369.1075853900193.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 03:12:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: ce2f30fb-e9a1-4e9f-ba35-7d5232c36751
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " dfossum.nsf Thanks Leslie--I appreciate your efforts and being kept up to speed. I'm forwarding this to some folks who are much closer to the Navajo ROW issues than I am. Lou and Steve, please let Leslie and/or me know what direction TW prefers as well as any pitfalls to be wary of. DF Leslie Lawner@EES 07/10/2000 11:11 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES Subject: New Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a sponsor the the New Mexico First Townhall on energy issues. I attended as the Enron person. The Townhall is now in its implementation phase and I want to bring you up to date on what is involved. A number of issues were put in our report, and I will get you a final copy this week (I think one will be available shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues stand out. First, producers and others joined in our frustation with the native American access issues (I did not raise them, but they came out loud and clear from the producers, which I thought was fine). Accordingly, the Townhall has recommended that our Congressional delegation use their bully pulpit power to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access, taxes, development and other issues. I would think that TW would want to be involved in this, if not a leader in this. Second, the townhall noted that pipeline infrastructure may need upgrading in the state. There are other issues that affect TW not as directly, but that you should be aware of. I will continue to be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well. At some point, it may be appropriate to bring in TW or ETS folks, as the action items move forward. Tom Rutherford is another resource that Tim used and that we can consider as things develop. Let me know if you need anything, have any thoughts or want to discuss. I am mindful of the marketing affiliate rules and I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so far we are in the clear. ", "row": 237, "chroma:document": "file: fossum-d/sent/386."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: f97827eb-77e1-4101-be84-fe29fd376894
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " dfossum.nsf Thanks Leslie--I appreciate your efforts and being kept up to speed. I'm forwarding this to some folks who are much closer to the Navajo ROW issues than I am. Lou and Steve, please let Leslie and/or me know what direction TW prefers as well as any pitfalls to be wary of. DF Leslie Lawner@EES 07/10/2000 11:11 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES Subject: New Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a sponsor the the New Mexico First Townhall on energy issues. I attended as the Enron person. The Townhall is now in its implementation phase and I want to bring you up to date on what is involved. A number of issues were put in our report, and I will get you a final copy this week (I think one will be available shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues stand out. First, producers and others joined in our frustation with the native American access issues (I did not raise them, but they came out loud and clear from the producers, which I thought was fine). Accordingly, the Townhall has recommended that our Congressional delegation use their bully pulpit power to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access, taxes, development and other issues. I would think that TW would want to be involved in this, if not a leader in this. Second, the townhall noted that pipeline infrastructure may need upgrading in the state. There are other issues that affect TW not as directly, but that you should be aware of. I will continue to be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well. At some point, it may be appropriate to bring in TW or ETS folks, as the action items move forward. Tom Rutherford is another resource that Tim used and that we can consider as things develop. Let me know if you need anything, have any thoughts or want to discuss. I am mindful of the marketing affiliate rules and I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so far we are in the clear. ", "row": 237, "chroma:document": "message: dfossum.nsf Thanks Leslie--I appreciate your efforts and being kept up to speed. I'm forwarding this to some folks who are much closer to the Navajo ROW issues than I am. Lou and Steve, please let Leslie and/or me know what direction TW prefers as well as any pitfalls to be wary of. DF Leslie Lawner@EES 07/10/2000 11:11 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES Subject: New Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 6a68396e-98df-4d86-9658-6cd170487ec3
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " dfossum.nsf Thanks Leslie--I appreciate your efforts and being kept up to speed. I'm forwarding this to some folks who are much closer to the Navajo ROW issues than I am. Lou and Steve, please let Leslie and/or me know what direction TW prefers as well as any pitfalls to be wary of. DF Leslie Lawner@EES 07/10/2000 11:11 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES Subject: New Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a sponsor the the New Mexico First Townhall on energy issues. I attended as the Enron person. The Townhall is now in its implementation phase and I want to bring you up to date on what is involved. A number of issues were put in our report, and I will get you a final copy this week (I think one will be available shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues stand out. First, producers and others joined in our frustation with the native American access issues (I did not raise them, but they came out loud and clear from the producers, which I thought was fine). Accordingly, the Townhall has recommended that our Congressional delegation use their bully pulpit power to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access, taxes, development and other issues. I would think that TW would want to be involved in this, if not a leader in this. Second, the townhall noted that pipeline infrastructure may need upgrading in the state. There are other issues that affect TW not as directly, but that you should be aware of. I will continue to be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well. At some point, it may be appropriate to bring in TW or ETS folks, as the action items move forward. Tom Rutherford is another resource that Tim used and that we can consider as things develop. Let me know if you need anything, have any thoughts or want to discuss. I am mindful of the marketing affiliate rules and I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so far we are in the clear. ", "row": 237, "chroma:document": "Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a sponsor the the New Mexico First Townhall on energy issues. I attended as the Enron person. The Townhall is now in its implementation phase and I want to bring you up to date on what is involved. A number of issues were put in our report, and I will get you a final copy this week (I think one will be available shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 089d86a9-998e-4730-966f-193e258d433f
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " dfossum.nsf Thanks Leslie--I appreciate your efforts and being kept up to speed. I'm forwarding this to some folks who are much closer to the Navajo ROW issues than I am. Lou and Steve, please let Leslie and/or me know what direction TW prefers as well as any pitfalls to be wary of. DF Leslie Lawner@EES 07/10/2000 11:11 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES Subject: New Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a sponsor the the New Mexico First Townhall on energy issues. I attended as the Enron person. The Townhall is now in its implementation phase and I want to bring you up to date on what is involved. A number of issues were put in our report, and I will get you a final copy this week (I think one will be available shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues stand out. First, producers and others joined in our frustation with the native American access issues (I did not raise them, but they came out loud and clear from the producers, which I thought was fine). Accordingly, the Townhall has recommended that our Congressional delegation use their bully pulpit power to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access, taxes, development and other issues. I would think that TW would want to be involved in this, if not a leader in this. Second, the townhall noted that pipeline infrastructure may need upgrading in the state. There are other issues that affect TW not as directly, but that you should be aware of. I will continue to be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well. At some point, it may be appropriate to bring in TW or ETS folks, as the action items move forward. Tom Rutherford is another resource that Tim used and that we can consider as things develop. Let me know if you need anything, have any thoughts or want to discuss. I am mindful of the marketing affiliate rules and I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so far we are in the clear. ", "row": 237, "chroma:document": "shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues stand out. First, producers and others joined in our frustation with the native American access issues (I did not raise them, but they came out loud and clear from the producers, which I thought was fine). Accordingly, the Townhall has recommended that our Congressional delegation use their bully pulpit power to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access,"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: b383b732-e626-48dc-9f26-67384c3357aa
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " dfossum.nsf Thanks Leslie--I appreciate your efforts and being kept up to speed. I'm forwarding this to some folks who are much closer to the Navajo ROW issues than I am. Lou and Steve, please let Leslie and/or me know what direction TW prefers as well as any pitfalls to be wary of. DF Leslie Lawner@EES 07/10/2000 11:11 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES Subject: New Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a sponsor the the New Mexico First Townhall on energy issues. I attended as the Enron person. The Townhall is now in its implementation phase and I want to bring you up to date on what is involved. A number of issues were put in our report, and I will get you a final copy this week (I think one will be available shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues stand out. First, producers and others joined in our frustation with the native American access issues (I did not raise them, but they came out loud and clear from the producers, which I thought was fine). Accordingly, the Townhall has recommended that our Congressional delegation use their bully pulpit power to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access, taxes, development and other issues. I would think that TW would want to be involved in this, if not a leader in this. Second, the townhall noted that pipeline infrastructure may need upgrading in the state. There are other issues that affect TW not as directly, but that you should be aware of. I will continue to be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well. At some point, it may be appropriate to bring in TW or ETS folks, as the action items move forward. Tom Rutherford is another resource that Tim used and that we can consider as things develop. Let me know if you need anything, have any thoughts or want to discuss. I am mindful of the marketing affiliate rules and I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so far we are in the clear. ", "row": 237, "chroma:document": "to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access, taxes, development and other issues. I would think that TW would want to be involved in this, if not a leader in this. Second, the townhall noted that pipeline infrastructure may need upgrading in the state. There are other issues that affect TW not as directly, but that you should be aware of. I will continue to be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: ca4444f3-4326-4ff9-abbc-a247f45eb70d
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " dfossum.nsf Thanks Leslie--I appreciate your efforts and being kept up to speed. I'm forwarding this to some folks who are much closer to the Navajo ROW issues than I am. Lou and Steve, please let Leslie and/or me know what direction TW prefers as well as any pitfalls to be wary of. DF Leslie Lawner@EES 07/10/2000 11:11 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES Subject: New Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a sponsor the the New Mexico First Townhall on energy issues. I attended as the Enron person. The Townhall is now in its implementation phase and I want to bring you up to date on what is involved. A number of issues were put in our report, and I will get you a final copy this week (I think one will be available shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues stand out. First, producers and others joined in our frustation with the native American access issues (I did not raise them, but they came out loud and clear from the producers, which I thought was fine). Accordingly, the Townhall has recommended that our Congressional delegation use their bully pulpit power to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access, taxes, development and other issues. I would think that TW would want to be involved in this, if not a leader in this. Second, the townhall noted that pipeline infrastructure may need upgrading in the state. There are other issues that affect TW not as directly, but that you should be aware of. I will continue to be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well. At some point, it may be appropriate to bring in TW or ETS folks, as the action items move forward. Tom Rutherford is another resource that Tim used and that we can consider as things develop. Let me know if you need anything, have any thoughts or want to discuss. I am mindful of the marketing affiliate rules and I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so far we are in the clear. ", "row": 237, "chroma:document": "be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well. At some point, it may be appropriate to bring in TW or ETS folks, as the action items move forward. Tom Rutherford is another resource that Tim used and that we can consider as things develop. Let me know if you need anything, have any thoughts or want to discuss. I am mindful of the marketing affiliate rules and I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 8fe19440-6d44-4f04-be65-746850848906
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " dfossum.nsf Thanks Leslie--I appreciate your efforts and being kept up to speed. I'm forwarding this to some folks who are much closer to the Navajo ROW issues than I am. Lou and Steve, please let Leslie and/or me know what direction TW prefers as well as any pitfalls to be wary of. DF Leslie Lawner@EES 07/10/2000 11:11 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES Subject: New Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a sponsor the the New Mexico First Townhall on energy issues. I attended as the Enron person. The Townhall is now in its implementation phase and I want to bring you up to date on what is involved. A number of issues were put in our report, and I will get you a final copy this week (I think one will be available shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues stand out. First, producers and others joined in our frustation with the native American access issues (I did not raise them, but they came out loud and clear from the producers, which I thought was fine). Accordingly, the Townhall has recommended that our Congressional delegation use their bully pulpit power to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access, taxes, development and other issues. I would think that TW would want to be involved in this, if not a leader in this. Second, the townhall noted that pipeline infrastructure may need upgrading in the state. There are other issues that affect TW not as directly, but that you should be aware of. I will continue to be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well. At some point, it may be appropriate to bring in TW or ETS folks, as the action items move forward. Tom Rutherford is another resource that Tim used and that we can consider as things develop. Let me know if you need anything, have any thoughts or want to discuss. I am mindful of the marketing affiliate rules and I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so far we are in the clear. ", "row": 237, "chroma:document": "I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so far we are in the clear."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 9f8e4171-bd9d-4636-b620-e270bb760c7d
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " dfossum.nsf Thanks Leslie--I appreciate your efforts and being kept up to speed. I'm forwarding this to some folks who are much closer to the Navajo ROW issues than I am. Lou and Steve, please let Leslie and/or me know what direction TW prefers as well as any pitfalls to be wary of. DF Leslie Lawner@EES 07/10/2000 11:11 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES Subject: New Mexico First Drew, as you may remember, before Tim Aren abandoned service, he had signed TW up as a sponsor the the New Mexico First Townhall on energy issues. I attended as the Enron person. The Townhall is now in its implementation phase and I want to bring you up to date on what is involved. A number of issues were put in our report, and I will get you a final copy this week (I think one will be available shortly). There is an implementation meeting in Alb. tomorrow. From TW's standpoint, a few issues stand out. First, producers and others joined in our frustation with the native American access issues (I did not raise them, but they came out loud and clear from the producers, which I thought was fine). Accordingly, the Townhall has recommended that our Congressional delegation use their bully pulpit power to call a summit with the energy industry and the indian nations to discuss right of ways, access, taxes, development and other issues. I would think that TW would want to be involved in this, if not a leader in this. Second, the townhall noted that pipeline infrastructure may need upgrading in the state. There are other issues that affect TW not as directly, but that you should be aware of. I will continue to be on the implementation team, and I can bring your issues along and keep you up to date as well. At some point, it may be appropriate to bring in TW or ETS folks, as the action items move forward. Tom Rutherford is another resource that Tim used and that we can consider as things develop. Let me know if you need anything, have any thoughts or want to discuss. I am mindful of the marketing affiliate rules and I don't want to get in trouble with them, but I am an employee of Enron Corp. so I do feel that so far we are in the clear. ", "row": 237, "chroma:document": "length: 2176\nlabels: fossum-d/sent/386. Message-ID: <19668881.1075842501524.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 06:37:00 -0700 (PDT)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: d66bcf07-55ce-44f5-a012-ee24a0a00e6b
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Thanks Fran. Let me know if it bogs down or anything. I'd like to get it done. -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 1:59 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tupdate on DART product Sean, I am working with Nikolay in Enpower IT (Bill Crook's and Will Smith's group) on this project. They advised the week after next week they shall give us something to test on. I will update you on that when it happens. Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 11:08 AM To:\tChang, Fran Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product -----Original Message----- From: \tSemperger, Cara Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:19 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tRE: Important! DART product I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says Exclude DART deals, and have it default to the checked position. That should take care of it. (Both versions of build route, Will Smith will know what I am talking about). -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:07 PM To:\tSemperger, Cara Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product Importance:\tHigh -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tImportant! DART product Importance:\tHigh Sean: Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL. In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the \"DART flag\" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications. If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place. Thanks, Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) ", "row": 238, "chroma:document": "file: crandell-s/sent_items/53."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: fe5ccab9-5110-4918-a345-69bbb86e6503
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Thanks Fran. Let me know if it bogs down or anything. I'd like to get it done. -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 1:59 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tupdate on DART product Sean, I am working with Nikolay in Enpower IT (Bill Crook's and Will Smith's group) on this project. They advised the week after next week they shall give us something to test on. I will update you on that when it happens. Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 11:08 AM To:\tChang, Fran Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product -----Original Message----- From: \tSemperger, Cara Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:19 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tRE: Important! DART product I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says Exclude DART deals, and have it default to the checked position. That should take care of it. (Both versions of build route, Will Smith will know what I am talking about). -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:07 PM To:\tSemperger, Cara Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product Importance:\tHigh -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tImportant! DART product Importance:\tHigh Sean: Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL. In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the \"DART flag\" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications. If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place. Thanks, Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) ", "row": 238, "chroma:document": "message: Thanks Fran. Let me know if it bogs down or anything. I'd like to get it done. -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 1:59 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tupdate on DART product Sean, I am working with Nikolay in Enpower IT (Bill Crook's and Will Smith's group) on this project. They advised the week after next week they shall give us something to test on. I will update you on that when it happens. Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: a60500ec-3561-48a2-9ecf-5885fe0c5725
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Thanks Fran. Let me know if it bogs down or anything. I'd like to get it done. -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 1:59 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tupdate on DART product Sean, I am working with Nikolay in Enpower IT (Bill Crook's and Will Smith's group) on this project. They advised the week after next week they shall give us something to test on. I will update you on that when it happens. Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 11:08 AM To:\tChang, Fran Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product -----Original Message----- From: \tSemperger, Cara Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:19 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tRE: Important! DART product I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says Exclude DART deals, and have it default to the checked position. That should take care of it. (Both versions of build route, Will Smith will know what I am talking about). -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:07 PM To:\tSemperger, Cara Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product Importance:\tHigh -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tImportant! DART product Importance:\tHigh Sean: Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL. In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the \"DART flag\" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications. If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place. Thanks, Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) ", "row": 238, "chroma:document": "will update you on that when it happens. Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 11:08 AM To:\tChang, Fran Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product -----Original Message----- From: \tSemperger, Cara Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:19 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tRE: Important! DART product I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 8064d35b-293f-4175-ae33-46f71e4e2cbe
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Thanks Fran. Let me know if it bogs down or anything. I'd like to get it done. -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 1:59 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tupdate on DART product Sean, I am working with Nikolay in Enpower IT (Bill Crook's and Will Smith's group) on this project. They advised the week after next week they shall give us something to test on. I will update you on that when it happens. Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 11:08 AM To:\tChang, Fran Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product -----Original Message----- From: \tSemperger, Cara Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:19 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tRE: Important! DART product I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says Exclude DART deals, and have it default to the checked position. That should take care of it. (Both versions of build route, Will Smith will know what I am talking about). -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:07 PM To:\tSemperger, Cara Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product Importance:\tHigh -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tImportant! DART product Importance:\tHigh Sean: Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL. In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the \"DART flag\" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications. If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place. Thanks, Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) ", "row": 238, "chroma:document": "I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says Exclude DART deals, and have it default to the checked position. That should take care of it. (Both versions of build route, Will Smith will know what I am talking about). -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:07 PM To:\tSemperger, Cara Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product Importance:\tHigh -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tThursday, November 08,"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 92fbd029-36f6-4a5e-a69d-5f077192a6fd
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Thanks Fran. Let me know if it bogs down or anything. I'd like to get it done. -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 1:59 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tupdate on DART product Sean, I am working with Nikolay in Enpower IT (Bill Crook's and Will Smith's group) on this project. They advised the week after next week they shall give us something to test on. I will update you on that when it happens. Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 11:08 AM To:\tChang, Fran Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product -----Original Message----- From: \tSemperger, Cara Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:19 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tRE: Important! DART product I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says Exclude DART deals, and have it default to the checked position. That should take care of it. (Both versions of build route, Will Smith will know what I am talking about). -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:07 PM To:\tSemperger, Cara Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product Importance:\tHigh -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tImportant! DART product Importance:\tHigh Sean: Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL. In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the \"DART flag\" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications. If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place. Thanks, Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) ", "row": 238, "chroma:document": "product Importance:\tHigh -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tImportant! DART product Importance:\tHigh Sean: Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL. In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the \"DART flag\" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 5e7693f2-6ead-49ac-a98d-47f4e75a7efe
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Thanks Fran. Let me know if it bogs down or anything. I'd like to get it done. -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 1:59 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tupdate on DART product Sean, I am working with Nikolay in Enpower IT (Bill Crook's and Will Smith's group) on this project. They advised the week after next week they shall give us something to test on. I will update you on that when it happens. Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 11:08 AM To:\tChang, Fran Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product -----Original Message----- From: \tSemperger, Cara Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:19 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tRE: Important! DART product I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says Exclude DART deals, and have it default to the checked position. That should take care of it. (Both versions of build route, Will Smith will know what I am talking about). -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:07 PM To:\tSemperger, Cara Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product Importance:\tHigh -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tImportant! DART product Importance:\tHigh Sean: Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL. In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the \"DART flag\" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications. If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place. Thanks, Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) ", "row": 238, "chroma:document": "I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications. If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place. Thanks, Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: eff47a65-8149-4d1f-bdee-3580cb028909
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " Thanks Fran. Let me know if it bogs down or anything. I'd like to get it done. -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 1:59 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tupdate on DART product Sean, I am working with Nikolay in Enpower IT (Bill Crook's and Will Smith's group) on this project. They advised the week after next week they shall give us something to test on. I will update you on that when it happens. Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tFriday, November 09, 2001 11:08 AM To:\tChang, Fran Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product -----Original Message----- From: \tSemperger, Cara Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:19 PM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tRE: Important! DART product I think that if the Enpower guys can modify the Build Route Reports to have a check box that says Exclude DART deals, and have it default to the checked position. That should take care of it. (Both versions of build route, Will Smith will know what I am talking about). -----Original Message----- From: \tCrandall, Sean Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 12:07 PM To:\tSemperger, Cara Subject:\tFW: Important! DART product Importance:\tHigh -----Original Message----- From: \tChang, Fran Sent:\tThursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM To:\tCrandall, Sean Subject:\tImportant! DART product Importance:\tHigh Sean: Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL. In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the \"DART flag\" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers. I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications. If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place. Thanks, Fran Chang West Power Risk Management 503.464.7973 (phone) 503.464.3740 (fax) ", "row": 238, "chroma:document": "length: 2114\nlabels: crandell-s/sent_items/53. Message-ID: <33238777.1075840062847.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:59:12 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 573b2a0f-b387-4793-a06f-f9e95d213fdd
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kmann.nsf Laura, Here's the revised version: Here's a compared version so you will know what I did: I'll work on the transfer price agreement today or this weekend so we will have something to discuss. I'm planning on being in Chicago on Thursday if you would like to discuss any of these matters. Kay", "row": 239, "chroma:document": "file: mann-k/sent/669.\nmessage: kmann.nsf Laura, Here's the revised version: Here's a compared version so you will know what I did: I'll work on the transfer price agreement today or this weekend so we will have something to discuss. I'm planning on being in Chicago on Thursday if you would like to discuss any of these matters. Kay\nlength: 302\nlabels: mann-k/sent/669. Message-ID: <16836070.1075845934485.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 00:45:00 -0700 (PDT)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: d95b5bb8-132d-4721-b200-ac043baec522
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "file: ruscitti-k/ces/5."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 038ede57-555b-40a2-a460-d3bc14801619
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "message: kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 6c462f13-1b5d-4d63-aa90-819f88c8d4a2
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: a939f003-fbee-47ce-af2f-515c86b6aef8
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: d699ce71-b6f0-44fd-860a-2a9797e5dabe
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\""}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 5d3cd248-fc24-4ac0-b09c-40650f551306
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 78991ea5-d87d-4279-ba36-ea609db7c7e1
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 0f520c17-6385-4ecc-81b5-a7ee5b64c223
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 52bd76f9-c098-4593-87a3-8867f915683b
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 601cc8e5-9331-46ba-9142-7b0e6ec5c5d8
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 8f99e80c-4e4d-4c15-820c-ccbdc19035e7
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 6da50b3a-ff93-4586-98c9-6fcbafaadf69
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kruscit.nsf Responses: 1. I'll let Kevin answer this one. ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes. 2. I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1. If possible I would like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes through March 2001. However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas on TCO for April. I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we are buying back gas at GD - $.01. 3. Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price? Does Duke bill CES directly for this? 4. See attached worksheets. 5. I don't know all the information on the local production yet. The pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing using ENA transport). The attached April file has a Local Production tab. Molly Johnson is updating this information. After she completes April, she will recreate Jan - Mar. 6. Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about the individual citygate volumes. For pricing purposes, I only care about total daily deliveries. It would be a problem if you were trying to take additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and you don't have enough capacity. This holds true for most other pipelines as well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ... This would be a better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something specific as it comes up. The only thing I will not allow you to do is take gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has discussed this with Melissa. dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM To: \" - *Chris.Germany@enron.com\" <Chris.Germany@enron.com> cc: \" - *Dalphon, Charles\" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Porter, Jeffrey\" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, \" - *Flewellyn, Melissa\" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com> Subject: Questions Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly. Please look it over and let's talk. The items are not prioritized in any way. 1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR the price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I. The same is true for delivery points into Michcon. Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7 plus the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon? Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7 as the price index for Michcon. 2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1: TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12. However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000. Are we required to do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense with this? I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue. 3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are incorrect. The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume. Since the supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend to do a simultaneous \"buy/sell\" with Enron of the volumes in excess of the (erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume. If you disagree, let's discuss. 4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21 (O&R), TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please provide me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly basis for April at each of these points? (I also need these numbers for January, February, and March.) 5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced? 6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)? There will undoubtedly be other questions. I will direct them to you as they arise. Thanks. Doug Kinney Ph: 703-561-6339 Fax: 703-561-7317 ", "row": 240, "chroma:document": "length: 4171\nlabels: ruscitti-k/ces/5. Message-ID: <18011569.1075857815453.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 02:06:00 -0700 (PDT)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 41c50245-4936-44f5-9bd4-3a3b84cbdadc
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "file: symes-k/all_documents/1622."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 584ccdb2-6969-42f6-9427-20b029527863
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "message: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: a8710c2d-2162-4aaf-bbbe-d0f23352e33b
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 09b45d6f-d1ad-4328-8bf3-dd7f644c629f
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 7d6103c6-c51b-4af0-a117-cb75abf8fca8
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "=20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: d3b29983-040f-49c2-b51a-6941a48f927c
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 223a6c8f-2337-4bc6-af66-0e28de647cea
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: cdf33c5a-714b-47d3-809a-52e10c818100
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 9edcabec-8090-4025-9e71-2ae5cbd41564
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market,"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: ac0f7288-916d-43ab-96c2-eb5a5624da18
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 14087c66-8368-4bc7-8365-9deee047ee74
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: f2f95d7b-937a-440d-b48b-559cc3d93551
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\""}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: e144924a-212e-40e6-92d1-10ec1fe6633e
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "- Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 1f1250d9-08d5-4740-b82f-20fb56b65fc2
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 0cb0966c-1b0a-42e5-9b6b-3f0717f79a87
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " kate symes 6-27-02.nsf BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS East Power Group The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001. The realignme= nt=20 of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing= ,=20 and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,=20 producing both a high volume of transactions and high value. More=20 transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including o= ne=20 deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well. Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration= =20 facilities located in southeastern North Carolina. ENA will supply steam t= o=20 the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the=20 merchant market. The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service=20 territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.= =20 These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina. = =20 This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators fr= om=20 the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring th= is=20 deal to execution. They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage= =20 the coal supply and emissions issues. Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactio= ns=20 are in the pipeline. Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 1= 80=20 MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin. The facility i= s=20 scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in= =20 Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both= =20 trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access=20 real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations. Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor = of=20 Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)=20 existing power plant in that city. Our proposed 180 MW facility will be us= ed=20 to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percen= t=20 less cost than FPUA can produce it. According to FPUA officials, this=20 reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers. The=20 planned in-service date is summer of 2002. Industrial Markets EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again! The Fundamental Analysis Group= =20 continues to expand its staff and capabilities. They will be introducing y= ou=20 to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce yo= u=20 to the new staff members who have joined in the past month. =20 On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the= =20 lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured= =20 transactions. =20 For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market=20 analysis and econometric/price forecasting support. Our latest recruit,=20 David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management=20 system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible= =20 enhancement to the group=01,s operations has been the Intranet web site, wh= ich=20 has been in development for the past three months. The site will be=20 transferred to a production server by the end of February. The site contai= ns=20 all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial=20 information for deal analysis. =20 Another major development is the adoption of a customer information=20 management system. EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software= =20 provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES. IN THE NEWS Enron has been named the \"Most Innovative Company in America\" for the sixth= =20 consecutive year by Fortune. That's right -- six years in a row. We=20 continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate=20 executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard fo= r=20 doing business in the new economy. Congratulations to all of you for makin= g=20 it happen. Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 \"Most=20 Admired Companies,\" up from No. 36 last year. We also were ranked among th= e=20 top five in \"Quality of Management,\" \"Quality of Products/Services\" and=20 \"Employee Talent.\" =20 This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstand= s=20 Monday, Feb. 12. For more information, go to www.fortune.com. NUGGETS & NOTES \"The revolution has begun......\" - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting=20 Operations \"We trade propane and propane accessories\" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LP= G=20 Trading-EGM WELCOME New Hires EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy= =20 James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang LEGAL STUFF The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietar= y=20 to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only= =20 and should not be disclosed.", "row": 241, "chroma:document": "length: 5078\nlabels: symes-k/all_documents/1622. Message-ID: <16520189.1075841652102.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:30:00 -0800 (PST)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: c6932580-6136-4b27-900f-966181c934f6
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sshackle.nsf Melissa: Merchant looks good. Please email to Chris. Also, thanks for your help with the omnibus forms. Anne Koehler is the new lawyer in our group and I'm sure she'll be calling you. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com \tMelissa Ann Murphy \t04/25/2001 05:01 PM \t\t \t\t To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Hello, I did not define NERC correctly on the into tva confirm or the Merchant confirm. Here are the revised documents. Thanks, Melissa ", "row": 242, "chroma:document": "file: shackleton-s/all_documents/10832."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: ea2740a1-b35f-4b79-b629-5328178c37e4
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sshackle.nsf Melissa: Merchant looks good. Please email to Chris. Also, thanks for your help with the omnibus forms. Anne Koehler is the new lawyer in our group and I'm sure she'll be calling you. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com \tMelissa Ann Murphy \t04/25/2001 05:01 PM \t\t \t\t To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Hello, I did not define NERC correctly on the into tva confirm or the Merchant confirm. Here are the revised documents. Thanks, Melissa ", "row": 242, "chroma:document": "message: sshackle.nsf Melissa: Merchant looks good. Please email to Chris. Also, thanks for your help with the omnibus forms. Anne Koehler is the new lawyer in our group and I'm sure she'll be calling you. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com \tMelissa Ann Murphy \t04/25/2001 05:01 PM \t\t \t\t To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Hello, I did not define NERC correctly on the into"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: b1230054-15f3-49a4-b2c3-dd82ef9e0869
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sshackle.nsf Melissa: Merchant looks good. Please email to Chris. Also, thanks for your help with the omnibus forms. Anne Koehler is the new lawyer in our group and I'm sure she'll be calling you. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com \tMelissa Ann Murphy \t04/25/2001 05:01 PM \t\t \t\t To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Hello, I did not define NERC correctly on the into tva confirm or the Merchant confirm. Here are the revised documents. Thanks, Melissa ", "row": 242, "chroma:document": "Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Hello, I did not define NERC correctly on the into tva confirm or the Merchant confirm. Here are the revised documents. Thanks, Melissa"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: f69c2b51-9cc1-4fce-89ae-ae173f7eb297
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " sshackle.nsf Melissa: Merchant looks good. Please email to Chris. Also, thanks for your help with the omnibus forms. Anne Koehler is the new lawyer in our group and I'm sure she'll be calling you. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com \tMelissa Ann Murphy \t04/25/2001 05:01 PM \t\t \t\t To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT \t\t cc: \t\t Subject: Hello, I did not define NERC correctly on the into tva confirm or the Merchant confirm. Here are the revised documents. Thanks, Melissa ", "row": 242, "chroma:document": "length: 589\nlabels: shackleton-s/all_documents/10832. Message-ID: <1505219.1075844741637.JavaMail.evans@thyme>\nDate: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:35:00 -0700 (PDT)"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 885cdfa5-dd0f-43d3-8a2c-d812cdba6454
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "file: lokay-m/articles/310."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: d04d7939-0814-4c2c-a3a9-539eeaa42092
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "message: mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 3dbe8191-0f5d-4c94-8f33-caeb3ff8ccf8
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business:"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 03aa5f65-d319-4cf0-acb8-db75fee2c132
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 235f15e8-ef7d-422f-8487-2b49cc07f1db
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J."}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: fed2128a-3e08-4525-a0bd-93a99c22aed3
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 8ed71dcd-0df3-409f-969c-2e73ada0f499
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 411f7d49-af30-4bcd-a4d4-2799c48b2b8f
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 64eee0df-1553-4f63-8a9d-7b4534b41bb9
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: a7a23157-27f5-41a5-a638-e7d033cb2a83
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: fdf5bd78-1eb3-4108-965a-10050d56eef9
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70"}


created_at: 2024-04-07 12:30:53
topic: persistent://default/default/a5c8f248-d566-4c59-901e-293983d5ec83
id: 26e0a48a-8d72-48a6-b893-319f3d96a917
encoding: FLOAT32
metadata:
{"source": " mlokay.nsf Note the discussion on market share halfway through the article. Top Gas Gorillas Show Strong Volume Growth The year 2000 was a banner year for the top players in gas marketing, with huge increases in gas prices, enormous volatility, continuing growth in sales volumes and major potential for profits. Physical gas sales volumes for the top 20 marketers in NGI's ranking grew 17% to nearly 150 Bcf/d, and profits among the larger players came in very strong with companies such as Williams reporting 2,000% profit increases in their energy merchant segments. However, for many of the smaller players it was a tough year. \"The big news here is probably the price pressure the marketers have had to withstand,\" said Ben Schlesinger, president of Maryland-based consulting firm Schlesinger and Associates, which tracks energy marketing. \"These people have price exposure on both sides of their business: the buy side and sell side. They've actively sought to hedge these risks, but there's no question that there have been some real stresses in their businesses as a result of quadrupling gas prices in 2000.\" Significant shuffling has begun to take place and will continue, not just among the leadership but among the whole roster of 500 marketing companies, predicted Schlesinger. \"For the first time I'm not sure all 500 will make it because of the price volatility, and the stresses that it creates on their balance sheets and their ability to meet the different needs of their customers.\" If you are on the wrong side of a transaction these days in California, you are going to suffer significantly. It's not much different at the Henry Hub either, he noted. The harsh reality is that only the strong will survive. Ronald J. Barone of UBS Warburg believes the California energy crisis and fears of lack of gas supply and capacity are driving customers to the strongest marketers. \"I think that over the long term it will be a positive for the bigger players, such as Enron. Customers want to go with somebody who is big, has facilities, somebody who is going to guarantee it, somebody who can do risk management for them. Enron is the 800-pound gorilla here.\" Enron has been the 800-pound gorilla in gas marketing for years but there were always plenty of 750-pound gorillas around. Last year, however, Enron found a way to trade natural gas over the Internet and at last glance was well over 1,600 pounds, more than double the size of its next closest rival gorilla, Duke Energy. Enron sold 23.8 Bcf/d of gas last year compared to only 13.3 Bcf/d the year prior and compared to the 11.9 Bcf/d sold by Duke Energy, which came in second place in NGI's ranking of gas marketers by physical sales volume. Enron catapulted itself to the next level with the help of its handy new tool, EnronOnline, its web-based proprietary energy and commodity trading system that now handles about 3,000 mainly natural gas transactions each day. In 2000, Enron completed its first full year of deploying EnronOnline, which quickly became the world's largest web-based e-commerce site. During the year, Enron executed 548,000 transactions online with 3,000 customers, totaling $336 billion of gross value. The tremendous success of EnronOnline led many observers to wonder whether market concentration was beginning to take place in the industry. When you look at Enron's massive increase in wholesale transactions you have to wonder about that concentration. Enron's 23.8 Bcf/d is pretty large (35%) when compared with the 69 Bcf/d that is actually consumed in North America. But you have to factor in multiple trades --- one marketer trades a given molecule of gas to another marketer and so on. According to Schlesinger, the so-called \"churning factor\" is close to three. \"In the past several years when we've been polling marketers, we got numbers (in 1999) that came to about 60 Tcf. We added up all the physical sales by all the marketing companies. We did not have 100% response in our survey --- some of the mid-sized and smaller companies didn't respond. We reasonably extrapolated that about 65 Tcf, maybe even 70 Tcf of gas was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one company owns the entire 100% of the market, that's an HHI of 10,000. The Department of Justice has been using 1,800 as a red flag when it considers approval of mergers and acquisitions. According to Schlesinger, the total gas industry has an HHI of only about 200, way below any suggestion of market concentration. \"It's so low that it's unbelievable. It's a highly competitive business. Even if one competitor has 12% of the market (HHI of 144) and the next competitor has 6% and on down, it certainly doesn't send up any red flags,\" he said. \"It could be that market concentration in the gas industry has risen a bit in 2000, but this information alone would not diminish the fact that the industry is one of the most competitive businesses in the United States. However, there may be some regional issues we have to think about,\" he added. \"We haven't looked at that, so I can't comment on whether anyone has undue market power in a particular region or state, for example.\" There is a snowball effect going on among the top marketers. The leaders keep getting larger. Volume growth averages at least 10% per year or more. Several factors should fuel future growth. Price increases, volatility and uncertainty of supplies are driving buyers to the larger marketers, according to both Schlesinger and Barone. Online trading has become a new springboard for additional growth by allowing greater efficiency and many more trades to take place. Schlesinger said he believes electronic trading was responsible for a good part the 17% increase in volumes. Enron attributed much of its growth to the online business. According to some observers, online trading still has plenty of room to grow. Altra Energy CEO Paul Bourke believes about 30% of all gas trading now takes place over the Internet. Bourke said Altra had 8,000 natural gas trades on its system in December. However Barone predicts there eventually will be a slowdown in gas marketing growth in the United States as international energy markets grab the attention of many marketers. \"International should pick up the slack and contribute increasingly to the bottom line,\" he said. Barone also expects the current market situation and the continued interest in service, supply and commodity versatility to continue driving marketing companies together. \"I think size, scope and scale are incredibly significant.\" Only one of the top 20 major marketers last year resulted from the combination of two separate predecessors: Axia, which grew out of the combination of Koch Energy and Entergy. The rest of the group achieved its growth without major acquisitions or mergers. Thirteen out of the 20 top marketers showed double- or triple-digit volume growth with only two companies in the minus column. PG&E had the largest volume deterioration of any of the large marketers with a 40.1% decline in annual volumes and a 42% decline in quarterly volumes. PG&E went through a significant reorganization last year. The move of its National Energy Group (NEG) to Bethesda, MD, from Houston, had the greatest impact on its trading activity. But the company also sold its energy services business and its Texas gas transmission assets among other changes. \"It really slowed down our trading [and] a large number of people stayed behind in Houston,\" said company spokesman Patrick Hurston. At the time of the move, the company estimated about half, or 100, would make the move. Hurston wouldn't say how many actually made the trip, but the company is still actively hiring. TransCanada, which also underwent a massive reorganization last year, was the other company in the minus column with a 3% decline in sales volume. The remainder of the group experienced large increases in volumes: Enron at 94%, Duke with 15% growth, Sempra with 51% and BP Amoco with 100% growth. ", "row": 243, "chroma:document": "was traded each year in North America. Physical consumption in North America is about 25 Tcf so 70 divided by 25 is about 2.8.\" Using that calculation, Enron with 23.8 Bcf/d of physical gas sales in 2000 ends up with a not unreasonable 12% market share. When the Federal Trade Commission looks at markets and market share, it uses several tools, one of which is the Herschman-Herfindahl Index, a measure of market concentration. It's the sum of the squares of the market share of each participant. If one"}


