seonil commited on
Commit
b5bad93
1 Parent(s): f469daa

unbold for visibility

Browse files
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. README.md +1 -1
  2. harim_plus.py +1 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ description: >-
17
 
18
 
19
  # HaRiM+
20
- **HaRiM+: Evaluating Summary Quality with Hallucination Risk, accepted at AACL-22 [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12118).** <br />
21
  <br />
22
  HaRiM+ is reference-less metric for summarization task which hurls the power of summarization model to estimate the quality of the summary-article pair. <br />
23
  Note that this metric is reference-free and do not require training. It is ready to go without reference text to compare with the generation nor any model training for scoring.
 
17
 
18
 
19
  # HaRiM+
20
+ HaRiM+: Evaluating Summary Quality with Hallucination Risk, accepted at AACL-22 [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12118). <br />
21
  <br />
22
  HaRiM+ is reference-less metric for summarization task which hurls the power of summarization model to estimate the quality of the summary-article pair. <br />
23
  Note that this metric is reference-free and do not require training. It is ready to go without reference text to compare with the generation nor any model training for scoring.
harim_plus.py CHANGED
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ _CITATION = """\
30
  }
31
  """
32
 
33
- _DESCRIPTION = f"""**HaRiM+** is a reference-less evaluation metric (i.e. requires only article-summary pair, no reference summary) for summarization which hurls the power of summarization model.
34
  Summarization model inside the HaRiM+ will read and evaluate how good the quality of a summary given the paired article.
35
  It will work great for ranking the summary-article pairs according to its quality.
36
 
 
30
  }
31
  """
32
 
33
+ _DESCRIPTION = f"""HaRiM+ is a reference-less evaluation metric (i.e. requires only article-summary pair, no reference summary) for summarization which hurls the power of summarization model.
34
  Summarization model inside the HaRiM+ will read and evaluate how good the quality of a summary given the paired article.
35
  It will work great for ranking the summary-article pairs according to its quality.
36