|
,Review_Date,Author,Rating,Review_Title,Review,Review_Url |
|
0,19 July 2023,Orlando_Gardner,9, |
|
,,/review/rw9199470/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
1,20 July 2023,Jeremy_Urquhart,8, |
|
,,/review/rw9202448/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
2,20 July 2023,MrDHWong,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9202246/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
3,20 July 2023,and_mikkelsen,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9202357/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
4,26 July 2023,Geekofriendly,8, |
|
,,/review/rw9216587/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
5,19 July 2023,mohameddawoud-26019,10, |
|
,I may consider myself lucky to be alive to watch Christopher Nolan Works which get better by years.,/review/rw9200792/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
6,19 July 2023,mark-217-307033,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9199448/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
7,19 July 2023,Dvir971,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9200581/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
8,20 July 2023,zeki-4,8, |
|
,,/review/rw9202525/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
9,25 July 2023,EShy,6, |
|
,I'm a big Nolan fan. Maybe this one just wasn't for me.,/review/rw9213385/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
10,20 July 2023,Zay-Fee,9, |
|
,,/review/rw9202236/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
11,23 July 2023,timmyhollywood,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9209516/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
12,21 July 2023,FeastMode,5, |
|
,,/review/rw9203697/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
13,21 July 2023,pdean-49132,8, |
|
,,/review/rw9205442/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
14,22 July 2023,leestoych,8, |
|
,,/review/rw9205774/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
15,6 August 2023,Sleepin_Dragon,9, |
|
,,/review/rw9242571/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
16,19 July 2023,adrianbabech,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9201055/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
17,21 July 2023,slightlymad22,8, |
|
,I just got out of Oppenheimer,/review/rw9204588/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
18,28 July 2023,TheBigSick,, |
|
,0 out of 10 stars,/review/rw9219646/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
19,20 July 2023,tm-sheehan,10, |
|
, |
|
|
|
,/review/rw9201932/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
20,21 July 2023,Bonobo13579,7, |
|
,I'm a big fan of Nolan's work so was really looking forward to this. I understood there would be some flipping in timelines and I'd need to concentrate. I didn't find this to be a problem at all and the storytelling was beautifully done. The acting was universally excellent. I saw a review saying Emily Blunt was rather OTT but I didn't find that at all.,/review/rw9205066/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
21,20 July 2023,s-s-jewbali,10," WATCH IT IN IMAX!!! |
|
",This movie is a cinematic masterpiece!,/review/rw9201549/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
22,22 July 2023,JustStone,7," I Wish I Could Say I Had A Blast |
|
","I think I will be in the minority here when I say, I think Christopher Nolan missed the mark with this film. Let's first talk about what worked: Oppenheimer is no doubt a treat for the ears and eyes. I watched it in IMAX 70mm, the crispness of detail in the 70mm film stock was superb, and the 5.1 DTS-HD master audio surround sound was impactful, sometimes even shaking the seats. The acting was outstanding and there are some really memorable moments and tense scenes between actors. I also don't think I need to say anything further about Nolan as a filmmaker; he's like Martin Scorsese in the way you know exactly what you're going to get from a Nolan film, in terms of style and tone.",/review/rw9205912/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
23,4 August 2023,shanayneigh,4," Pearls before swine |
|
","First of all, I love Christoper Nolan's work. He's the only director whose films I always see in a cinema. But it's clear that he's is now so powerful that no one has the guts to tell him no. He's almost the Stephen King of film making these days, with the end results too often overly long and meandering. Perhaps my Nolan cinema-first policy will end after Oppenheimer. |
|
Oppen-bore-mer |
|
Cillian Murphy is exceptional in the lead role (Oscar worthy,I'll say) and he's ably supported by a terrific ensemble cast- great to see James Remar again. |
|
Good movie, but don't let Nolan fans fool you. |
|
","It's isn't a masterpiece. It's a decent biopic about an interesting person, has some good performances, and it's probably about 30 minutes too long.",/review/rw9211602/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
26,31 July 2023,Pjtaylor-96-138044,8," Fission. Fusion. Oscars. |
|
","Everybody involved with the production of 'Oppenheimer (2023)' is working at the highest conceivable level, practicing their craft so adeptly that it's hard to express just how impressive their efforts truly are. There isn't a weak link in the entire chain; everything is at the highest standard imaginable. The writing, the directing, the editing, the score, the cinematography, the sound design, the special effects, the costuming, the set design, the casting, and the acting - oh, the acting - is all impeccable. This film is exactly what it was always intended to be. If it doesn't clean up at the Oscars, I'll eat my shoe* or, more realistically, I'll be very surprised. |
|
Simply amazing |
|
This movie is very interesting and very thrilling. Since this movie had no action and was mostly just a documentary and was 3 hours long, I though that it was going to be boring. But, the 3 hours went by very fast and had me at the edge of my seat the whole time. This movie is like no other movie I had ever seen it is very unique and mind blowing. The cinematography is beautiful and the aesthetic of the movie is also beautiful. Anyone who is interested in the history of war and bombs would love this movie but I think anyone would enjoy this movie. Oppenheimer is one of the best movies I have seen this decade. |
|
No CGI here, just good writing and very good acting |
|
Oppenheimer was the most anticipated movie of the year for me. I wanted to see a thought provoking and visually stunning biography about a very controversial man, whose history I didn't actually knew before watching the movie but knew about as ""the father of the atomic bomb"". And well, I mostly got what I wanted, except the only problem is that I would have wanted that the journey getting there would have been more smooth and sharply written. I will start with the negative parts and finish with the positive since that mirrors somewhat how the movie flows.",/review/rw9263081/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
29,20 July 2023,vishwatej286,10," A sheer Brilliance of Christopher Nolan |
|
",Dr. J Robert Oppenheimer the creator of Atomic Bomb and his role in Manhattan Project in R&D for Nuclear weapon. The movie is the Biography of Dr. Oppenheimer.,/review/rw9202348/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
30,19 July 2023,jjqqhnqhg,10," Cinematic masterpiece |
|
","Nolan is back and delivers a fast paced thrilling biopic that will leave you stunned.the cinematography, sound design, score all exceptional. Every acting performance is perfect with Cillian Murphy and Robert Downey JR standing out. Nolan is experimenting with new styles of surrealist and subjective filmmaking to him which is so incredible to see from such a seasoned writer and director. He's pushing the envelope with Oppenheimer and challenging the audience like never before. |
|
Half an Hour too long, misses the point |
|
Nolan is good at constructing complicated timing events. But he is not good at telling a biopic. The first half of the movie needs too long to built up, introduces too many charcters the are not important to the story ( heisenberg, Jean Tatlock). So he could have cut half an hour easily to speed things up. |
|
His eyes look full of fear, regrets and guilt! |
|
Imagine a fire that you brought from the heaven and you give that fire to human , and that fire is used by humans to burn this world. |
|
Quite boring |
|
There are a few other reviews here echoing the same sentiments. I asked the people sitting next to me what they thought and they were disappointed. I can't help feel the same. I have a strong background in nuclear physics. It was intriguing, but it was cut so jarringly that it was hard to keep up what was going on.",/review/rw9207148/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
34,4 August 2023,JordanSatmary,4," no amount of dramatic music or quick cuts could convince me I was being entertained |
|
","God what an absolute mess. To all the people saying ""you need to pay attention and have your brain fully switched on""... that doesn't make this intelligent film. It makes it an overcomplicated nightmare. Nolan's movies have gone so far downhill since Dunkirk. The mess of 3 timelines is not needed for the entirety of every film. It works well for the majority of inception, the climax of the dark knight, parts of interstellar- but this? Not at all.",/review/rw9237291/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
35,28 July 2023,WhiteRabbitDave,," Overall a disappointing experience. |
|
","Although the time passed quickly, ultimately, Oppenheimer has left me disappointed. The problem with this film is that it can't decide which story it tries to tell - building the bomb or the inquiry of the national security committee. Both of those stories are depicted well, Nolan uses nice narrative devices to locate the characters in their currently depicted temporal location, etc. However, the cheap moral that the film concludes with has been beaten to death and because of that it undermines everything the script tried to achieve. The film didn't leave me speechless and a rather poorly executed sequence of the denotation doesn't really justify the historic development of a black and white IMAX film stock. |
|
superior filmmaking and historical storytelling |
|
Greetings again from the darkness. As pupils slouched in our school desks during history class, we easily and naturally disassociated with the many stories of war. World War II was lumped in with WWI, the Civil War, and The Revolutionary War. There were names and dates to memorize for quizzes and final exams, yet even with relatives recounting stories of kin, a personal connection was rare. As we aged and experienced modern-day warfare, the personal connection became all too real. Reality struck that soldiers are human beings with families, and despite their missions and marching orders, most are as innocent as the 'tragic civilian casualties' reported on the newswires. Along these lines, an aspect of war that has often remained overlooked is the behind-closed-doors decision-making of politicians and military leaders. Filmmaker-extraordinaire Christopher Nolan takes us behind those doors through the eyes of J Robert Oppenheimer, the Father of the Atomic Bomb. What we see is quite frightening. |
|
Nolan at his best! |
|
As VFX and special effects take over the traditional filmmaking methods, Nolan is among the remaining few directors who still builds grandiose true-to-life sets and reflects cinematic setpieces by filming them instead of digitising them. Oppenheimer is thus a culmination of Nolan's cinematic genius combined with an incredible story that changed the world in more ways than one. It's incredibly intimate and divisive, with the onus of it's justification being put on the audience instead of the narrator.",/review/rw9199902/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
38,22 July 2023,h-i-hussain7,8," Mini serie would have been a better way to go |
|
","First off, the dialogues are actually audible, quite clear, happy that they mended this in comparison to Nolan's last outing Tenet. |
|
What Walt's Watching |
|
","""Oppenheimer"" or ""How the Father of the Atomic Bomb learned to start worrying and Hate the Bomb""",/review/rw9203463/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
40,21 July 2023,EdwardtheBlackPrince,8," Do the means justify the end? |
|
","Oppenheimer has always been regarded by History as an interesting figure for the advancement of scientific discovery. While also being a rather controversial figure for his choices and mankind. Nolans Oppenheimer takes the audience on that dramatic epic of ethical proportions, in many ways, it is conflicting yet still fantasizing in every way Throughout the movie, you see the psyche and internal conflict, personal Matters left facing. The themes of the era with the red scare with McCarthyism, the paranoia and the shadow hanging over following Oppenheimer throughout. What the influence of such a weapon carries? The pressure put on a man. If the possibility of the enemy having such a thing, is it better to act before they do? Are the ones who claim to fight for you the ones to trust themselves? This is a movie about Mankind, not just the bomb being built, or the overall progress much of the war. Much like say The Imitation Game focusing on the war being fought behind the battle line. This is a very heavy dialogue-driven focus on the aspects of science and politics, and the psychological of Oppenheimer, but all of this things investing as you jump around these different time frames. Primary because of the great reforming given by like Cillian Murphy, Matt Damon, and Robert Downey who gives probably the second-best performance in this ensemble cast. With most of his films, the cinematography is done amazingly as well as the visuals that emphasize of fission and chain reactions of the panning landshot the use of and the lack of color, and of course the big payoff of the bomb and the impact of all, and the Explosions Performances that on the big screen can't be compared to watching it at home. |
|
But I can run the Manhattan Project. |
|
Filmmaker Paul Schreder has called Oppenheimer the best, most important film of this century. Hyperbole aside, we're only twenty-two plus years into the century, and not many of us will be around to confirm his hypothesis. So best? Well, that's very subjective. Important though, he might be onto something. Important in the way the latter part of the picture emphasizes Robert J. Oppenheimer's (Cillian Murphy) personal angst in leading a team that developed the capability of destroying the entire world and all of mankind. That could have occurred on July 16, 1945 with the testing of the first atomic bomb at Los Alamos, even Oppenheimer wasn't fully convinced of Edward Teller's (Benny Safdie) 'near zero' proclamation that all would be well.",/review/rw9220766/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
42,21 July 2023,lone_samurai678,7," Mixed feelings |
|
","The story is presented really well and through the eyes of Oppenheimer. 90% of the movie feels like a flashback scene which though looks really cool, doesn't actually feel like something I would watch again. As in classic Nolan style 3 timelines are running simultaneously - before the atom bomb dropped, after and the present. I feel like this could have been handled better especially in the second half of the movie. The two main events in the movies the bomb explosion and the last act felt underwhelming. Actually the bomb explosion scene for which everyone was waiting so intently for was underwhelming beyond belief - Nolan should have used CGI 100%, it looked like an explosion from the 90s. There were so many characters and sub-stories that it felt like someone compressed an entire tv series into a 3 hour long movie. |
|
A Very Nolan Film |
|
I can't help but wonder what this movie would've looked like if it had been directed by a different filmmaker, and I believe that it probably would've been better. Like most Nolan films this lacks emotion. Oppenheimer was a stoic man for sure but he had moments of catharsis throughout his life. Having read the book this film is based on (American Prometheus) I noticed that many of the relationships that affected his (Oppie's) life and career, and his hypnotic charisma were sadly missing in this film. The whole idea of the book, more over the whole point of Oppie's infamous testimony, was to explain the actions by shedding light on the man. I'm disappointed to say that this is no tale of the man, rather a tale of the Los Alamos project and a couple of testimonies. The film may have been packed with beautiful imagery, riveting score and decent performances, but it's painfully obvious that it lacks heart.",/review/rw9233822/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
44,25 July 2023,JPARM-IMDb,7," Unfortunately it didn't live up to the hype |
|
I have to admit: Oppenheimer didn't live up to the hype for me. This is not a bad film per se and while it depicts a frightening turning point in history, its style didn't suit me. |
|
Disappointing |
|
It saddens me that so many people are mistaking bigger and louder with quality. First of all, a loud soundtrack. No matter how good it might be doesn't equate to quality. In this film, it is overwhelming not complementing the film.",/review/rw9206224/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
46,21 July 2023,JohnDeSando,," Best movie of the year and one of the great war movies of all time. |
|
","""They won't fear it until they understand it. And they won't understand it until they've used it. Theory will take you only so far. J. Robert Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy) |
|
When Particle Worlds Collide... |
|
In a world that's problematic you're perplexing, spending your time with particles, that are complexing, pushing boundaries to their limits, the fission/fusion of new physics, with the clashes, conflicts, contests you elicit. As a consequence you setup two big bangs, when you execute through governmental plans, although this story does not dwell, on the hell that you propel, to the people who are wiped out in Japan. In the end we're left to ponder motivations, of those who seek to play, with torments and damnations, of those who hide inside the shadows, pulling strings in Emperor's clothes, as they plot to raze the cornerstone foundations. |
|
The greatness of Nolan's work |
|
","The cinematic genius Christopher Nolan is undoubtedly one of the finest stars in the film industry. With his unique talent and boundless creativity, he has crafted a new cinematic icon (Oppenheimer) that will undoubtedly be immortalized in the world of cinema. It will stand among the greatest works ever seen in the realm of cinema because Nolan only delivers iconic masterpieces.",/review/rw9200697/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
49,21 July 2023,id247,10," Christopher Nolan's best film so far! |
|
Saw Oppenheimer today on an IMAX screen. I'm an emotional wreck but also buzzing with delight! Finally we get an intelligent, mature film for grown-ups, with scientific wonder, espionage intrigue & political drama all In one. Superb ensemble acting & production. Nolan's pinnacle. |
|
Not for most of Gen Z |
|
This movie is not for people who watch the phone every 5 minutes, can't concentrate more time than a TiK Tok video or not trained into watching magnificent details.",/review/rw9215722/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
51,10 August 2023,tonypeacock-1,8," Misconceptions blown away. A film deserving of the long running time. |
|
","I admit to having some misconceptions about viewing this film at the cinema, in IMAX because of its subject matter and running time.",/review/rw9250152/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
52,19 July 2023,azwamuzakki,10," This is really a great movie by Christopher Nolan |
|
",Speechless this movie had a very good sound design good visual that will blow your Mind and you will getting the best score in this movie and one thing you all saying this is boring? God help this movie had very good plot and story by freackin Christopher Nolan without even one Freackin CGI and yall still saying this is boring pillow and a blanket yall don't know the plot is and not focus to the story this is top 3 best Christopher Nolan MOVIE i have ever SEEEN and i think for 3 hours movie is too short for this movie i want 4 hoursss and anyway what a good plot twist in the end the acting is badaass good and the rdj deserves an Oscar for this film.,/review/rw9200185/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
53,3 August 2023,HarCarmichael,7, |
|
,,/review/rw9234675/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
54,10 August 2023,cardsrock,9, |
|
,,/review/rw9251094/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
55,24 July 2023,amirnz,7, |
|
,,/review/rw9211692/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
56,23 July 2023,apereztenessa-1,5, |
|
,,/review/rw9209096/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
57,27 July 2023,maison-van-cleers,, |
|
,,/review/rw9218393/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
58,19 July 2023,show24studio,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9200172/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
59,22 July 2023,TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9206493/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
60,19 July 2023,tmamad,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9200158/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
61,29 July 2023,outrunkid,10, |
|
,This was one of my most anticipated films of the last few years and unbelievably it did not disappoint in any way.,/review/rw9223737/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
62,27 July 2023,adriano-40012,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9218927/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
63,31 July 2023,drawlife,8, |
|
,,/review/rw9229939/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
64,21 July 2023,schlomo-jones,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9204185/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
65,20 July 2023,Harri_,10, |
|
,Waited three hours for an explosion and it was probably the most disappointing part of the film.,/review/rw9202287/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
66,22 July 2023,matt-27634,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9206986/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
67,22 July 2023,imseeg,5, |
|
,I expected a thrilling story about building THE bomb. Almost NONE of that. What the what?,/review/rw9207636/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
68,22 July 2023,swapnadipchandra,, |
|
,,/review/rw9207704/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
69,21 July 2023,rgkarim,9, |
|
,LIKES:,/review/rw9204522/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
70,29 July 2023,christopher-cole83,9, |
|
,,/review/rw9222501/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
71,23 July 2023,boblipton,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9210210/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
72,20 July 2023,faeez_rizwan,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9201980/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
73,19 July 2023,hcoe-95812,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9200288/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
74,21 July 2023,851222,9, |
|
,Greetings from Lithuania.,/review/rw9205528/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
75,23 July 2023,siddharth-61578,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9209007/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
76,27 July 2023,srgymrat33,10, |
|
,I went in with very high expectations and somehow left being more blown away than I thought possible .,/review/rw9219184/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
77,22 July 2023,ahamedfahimq,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9206876/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
78,22 July 2023,DoNotComeToTheCinemaDepressed,5, |
|
,,/review/rw9205892/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
79,19 July 2023,ishraqrasif,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9201088/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
80,29 July 2023,cinemapersonified,10, |
|
, |
|
,/review/rw9224755/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
81,6 August 2023,synystargates,9, |
|
,Theory. Plutonium. Fire. Noise. Death. Morality. Compartmentalization. Oppenheimer.,/review/rw9242860/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
82,11 August 2023,bmiller59,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9251525/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
83,30 July 2023,don2507,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9228464/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
84,19 July 2023,aissammadmoun,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9200638/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
85,26 July 2023,alexglimbergwindh,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9217266/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
86,6 August 2023,anibalcnso,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9243578/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
87,26 July 2023,JamesAlvarez520,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9217009/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
88,30 July 2023,rune-andresen,3, |
|
,First of all- they left out the science and the interesting problem solving when inventing the a-bomb.,/review/rw9228294/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
89,23 July 2023,richard-1787,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9208306/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
90,21 July 2023,soham-21358,8, |
|
,,/review/rw9204175/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
91,21 July 2023,Anurag-Shetty,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9204271/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
92,27 July 2023,HorrorAndGore,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9219141/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
93,28 July 2023,UniqueParticle,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9219698/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
94,10 August 2023,grantss,8, |
|
,,/review/rw9250140/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
95,22 July 2023,JayShermanLovitz,6, |
|
,I'll start off by saying it is technically a good movie. The acting is good and the storytelling is good if a bit too quickly paced. It basically starts off at full speed and doesn't slow down. There wasn't really any suspension building in any scene except the bomb test. My biggest complaint is the intense background music that never stopped for more than a minute or two and it gets old pretty quick. In fact I contemplated leaving the theater because the constant dramatic music was driving me nuts. It's incessant and takes away from the film. This movie would have been a lot better if it had 50-75% less unnecessary background music.,/review/rw9205862/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
96,23 July 2023,kevin_robbins,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9208679/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
97,21 July 2023,BirdzOfParadise,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9204321/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
98,26 July 2023,HypnoticPoison7,4, |
|
,,/review/rw9215771/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
99,21 July 2023,julioramosest,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9204168/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
100,29 July 2023,NS-movie-reviews,10, |
|
,Christopher Nolan is a savant of filmmaking. Cillian Murphy SHINES in this movie. They are one absolutely amazing duo. Not to mention a strong supporting cast around them and.,/review/rw9225161/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
101,19 July 2023,gdabungke,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9200837/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
102,6 August 2023,maestroaz,8, |
|
,I enjoyed this film very much. The actors were very well chosen. The three hours passed quite quickly which is a sign to me that a movie is successfully engaging.,/review/rw9241237/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
103,21 July 2023,grandempire1738,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9203912/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
104,27 July 2023,bankofmarquis,9, |
|
,,/review/rw9219089/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
105,23 July 2023,IamROCKAS,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9210020/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
106,27 July 2023,chris_rowe-881-168820,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9218170/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
107,3 August 2023,andy_c_les,6, |
|
,,/review/rw9235272/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
108,25 July 2023,tyler200,5, |
|
,,/review/rw9214879/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
109,19 July 2023,headbangin_mammoth,10, |
|
,,/review/rw9200333/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
110,29 July 2023,Tovi_Se7en,10, |
|
,I can't express enough how absolutely phenomenal this movie is. It will stand the test of time and will possibly go down in history as one of the greatest films ever made.,/review/rw9225154/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
111,26 July 2023,galajokic,," I give it a 0 |
|
",Disgrace. I feel sorry for the paper that carried these pointless rows of dialogue and the hard drives packed with nonsensical scenes.,/review/rw9216034/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
112,2 August 2023,peridesai,10," Excellence surpassed |
|
","10 stars are not enough. This film is written stupendously well, the script is so intricate and complex it befits the mind of an uber genius like Oppenheimer explored by the genius of Nolan.",/review/rw9233965/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
113,22 July 2023,masonsaul,10," Epic, mature spectacle |
|
","Oppenheimer tracks one of the most important and terrifying events in the history of the world in epic fashion, creating a mature spectacle on a scale that's unheard of and feels like the culmination of all of Christopher Nolan's preoccupations whilst still breaking new ground. It's a sobering look at our impending doom. |
|
People who call it boring should have watched something else |
|
What an amazing movie, the visuals, sound, music, acting, directing, everything was 10/10, dont watch the film without knowing some history, its very philosophical type of movie, it makes you question about your actions, reflect on life, consequences, every minute of 3hr was amazing there was no boring scene, very good pacing, I understand its not meant for all audiences, yeah some scenes maybe could have been avoided but regardless the purpose of the movie was executed, definitely the type of movie that will be remembered for a long time. We can already expect it to leas best picture, actor, supporting actor, actress, sound, score, director, adapted screenplay and many more, |
|
Wow! What a powerful and engagaing movie! |
|
Wow! This movie just knocked me out! So many parts of the movie were just excellent. I think I need a little time to fully process everything.. but I left the theater just in awe of the movie. Acting, script, cinematography, directing, score, sound, and visuals... were all just amazing. |
|
Mixed bag, and yes, I was bored |
|
Was looking forward to seeing this movie on the big screen. Big fan of Nolan's previous movies and I usually like political and historical drama. On one side giving this movie anything less than '7' is hard, due to spectacular technical creation and a wonderful story told, but also I would argue that this movie does not deliver enough for its 3 hours length, in terms of interest and emotional attachment for the audience.",/review/rw9212600/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
117,20 July 2023,mattlx,8," A decent experience, still not perfect |
|
","The film's abundance of characters, combined with its non-linear narrative approach, might leave you a bit puzzled during your first viewing. |
|
No doubt a well made story, but overall, was just boring |
|
Maybe my expectations were off slightly. This was a character study into Oppenheimer and the tribulations of his career, and about his politics rather than truly about the science and production of the A bomb. I was hoping to see more nitty gritty into the bomb's development, and maybe some footage of its use in Japan to really reinforce the human toll and destruction of the immensely powerful weapon that they had created for the final act. Instead its just dramatic closeups of Opp's troubled face. But I feel we needed some more visuals (of war) to establish more emotion. It felt exceedingly anticlimactic. |
|
This movie feels like sitting in another comany's executive board meeting for 3 hours and listening to them blabble |
|
","And the only entertaining part is two hours in when someone ""passes gas.""",/review/rw9258298/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
120,17 August 2023,gortx,," Impressive bold Nolan production |
|
","Like its subject, Christopher Nolan's OPPENHEIMER is bold, flawed and largely successful. An impressive production that - while wide in scale and covering a span of several decades, also manages to be an intimate biography of the man at its center - J. Robert Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy). Nolan's screenplay (based on a book by Kai Bird and Martin Sherwin) is divided into three basic movements, although the story freely bounces back and forth in time. Nolan further bisects the film into subjective vs. Objective viewpoints (signaled by Color and B&W photography, respectively).",/review/rw9263900/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
121,10 August 2023,joebnow,10," Brilliant filmmaking |
|
","A totally mesmerizing film that has stayed with me long after I saw it. To begin, the performances down the line are superb. Murphy and Downey, Jr. Should be Oscar winners if there is any justice. But there's not a false note in the ensemble. Robert Oppenheimer is fascinating character. Hero or villain? The film gives us both perspectives and lets us decide for ourselves. The non linear storytelling works brilliantly because what could have seemed like two films works seamlessly as one. Three hours flies by. While I am not a Christopher Nolan fanatic, after seeing this, I have to admit the man is a genius. Cannot wait to see it again. |
|
Peak Cinema! |
|
Oppenheimer isn't a biopic, it's a journey of questions through the eyes of one person, Nolan delivered an intellectual dilemma that leaves you thinking for a long time. |
|
An important movie, I liked a lot in it. |
|
Will some think this is boring? For sure. Will some think it's too long? Undoubtedly. But overall I thought this was a very quality film like most of Christopher Nolan's movies, and while this one isn't my favorite it's still good for what it is. It's a JFK-like historical drama. The acting/cast were all incredible and so was the set design, and also the lack of CGI and special effects. The directing and camera work were awesome too. The middle part with them detonating the test bomb was a very well-constructed and tense scene. It was also intelligent in a way to only show the American perspective of the war and how out of touch/indifferent they were with the suffering that they inflicted on the Japanese civilian population, except of course for the main character. He was portrayed very well and this movie is coming out at a very critical time in history, reminding us of the destructive potential of escalating to nuclear war with other countries (no matter the side) and that our responsibility with handling weaponized nuclear technology is not to be taken lightly, and we must have a moral conscience. The movie also showed the quick/immediate development of a post-war McCarthyist government which was portrayed how it should have been. This is good and informative 20th century history!",/review/rw9211086/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
124,20 July 2023,iamianiman,8," While it is not Christopher Nolan's magnum opus, this is still one of his best works in history. |
|
Verdict: Hauntingly beautiful, Oppenheimer feels like a ticking time bomb as it evokes a strong visceral and immersive experience. Almost everything is done right, Christopher Nolan makes sure this film blows us away with a rich story, stark character studies, strong dialogues, powerful music score, impeccable acting amongst many others. While it is not Christopher Nolan's magnum opus, this is still one of his best ouevre in history.",/review/rw9202311/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
125,21 July 2023,magadalwarmayur,10," A jewel in Nolan's filmography. |
|
|
|
If this isn't a masterpiece, I don't know what else is. |
|
Oppenheimer is a rare biopic which, in spite of being driven entirely by dialogue and character drama, never bored me at any point. I was so amazed by the film that even after many a times not understanding the scientific stuff and all, I was glued to the screen, understanding it through the characters and their actions alone. I loved every bit of it and was totally focused. Once it was over, I walked out with a sense of satisfaction. |
|
Great Acting but, too long and complicated... |
|
Long story short, this could've been a way lot better if it was shorter, less complicated and with a bit less of new character introduction.",/review/rw9204938/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
128,22 July 2023,MOscarbradley,10," Nolan's best film to date. |
|
Like Martin Scorsese and Alfred Hitchcock before him Christopher Nolan is one of the few directors who can guarantee a paying audience as surely as any of the big box-office draws in the acting profession. A film-maker of great skill he has nevertheless often eschewed 'seriousness' to work, if not necessarily in the 'popcorn' market, then certainly in the commercial field and that's where he has built up his following. But what will his followers think of ""Oppenheimer""? Will today's movie-going generation even know who J. Robert Oppenheimer was, (at the full-house screening I attended I saw two people leave), and can Nolan do justice to his subject? |
|
Overhyped |
|
The world has been waiting for a first class drama to help bring em back to the movies after a shortage of really fine movies for a really long time. I went in hoping that this was gonna be the cinematic miracle that Hollywood has been holding it's breath for. It wasn't. It was a modestly adequate film that I could have skipped. With a running time of close to three hours, this ponderous film just felt repetitive and quite tedious throughout. There's an all star cast that would have been better served by appearing in a movie that had been written and edited with more selectivity. Had I seen it on TV and it had been a half hour shorter, perhaps I'd have thought more of it. |
|
late 1 hour for cinema screening? You won't miss anything |
|
","I studied Quantum Physics and I knew Oppenheimer biography before watching this movie so expectations were high. Unfortunately, full 3 hours do not make this much better than trailer - I learned nothing new. Outstanding acting from Cillian Murphy and RDJ, Emily was just blunt, so was Matt Damon's performance. Soundtrack is mediocre although delayed explosion sound made few people jump from their seats. Bomb making is virtually non-existent and there is a a lot of chat in the film, typical for a documentary. If you are late 1 hour for cinema screening, you won't miss anything it is that bad. I probably will never watch this again.",/review/rw9206774/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
131,21 July 2023,drewcallen,10," Phenomenal |
|
","This movie gets better the longer you think about it. Everything about the movie is so well done, especially Cillian Murphy's stunning portrayal of Oppenheimer as he realizes what he has done to humanity. The Trinity Test scene was perfectly well done, no horror movie has ever made my heart beat as much as that scene did. Seeing Strauss turn against Oppenheimer was super interesting (RDJ did amazing as him as well). The entire hearing act did a good job at showing how the different motives against Oppenheimer resulted in his downfall. The final scene of the movie is one of the most perfect scenes of any film i've ever seen. Strauss was trying to understand what Oppenheimer said to Einstein that day (assuming it was something to push Einstein against him), but it ended up being something so much more deep. The way the last scene was done was just so chilling and thought provoking, it will stick with you for days after watching it.",/review/rw9204747/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
132,21 July 2023,namob-43673,8," Marvellous and will win all the Oscars, but a challenging watch |
|
","As expected this is a fantastic movie. Oppenheimer contain some of the best acting ever seen and the directing is simply amazing. The music score is stunning, the story brilliantly told, and there are barely any flaws. This is intelligent filmmaking of the highest order and come Oscar season this will win all but a few of those statues.",/review/rw9204895/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
133,29 July 2023,jack_o_hasanov_imdb,8," Now I Am Become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds |
|
","This movie is one of the best movies of this year. I like C. Nolan. I also really liked this movie. The movie is told from Oppenheimer's point of view. I think it was fine. Some scientific topics were very difficult to understand for me. I think the bomb scene was good. I think the acting was very good. Cillian Murphy played the static, cold character very well. Robert Downey Jr. Played great too. I think tacting was generally so good. I think there were some boring scenes in the movie. There were scenes in the cinema where I started to sleep out of boredom. But overall, I think it deserves an 8 point. This movie is one of the best movies of this year. I like it. I also watched the other movie (pink movie) first. It was so good after that movie. |
|
Christopher Nolan gives us a brilliant drama with Cillian Murphy giving us his best performance yet, one of the best films of the decade - My Ultimate Review |
|
My expectations are always high for a film made by Christopher Nolan who oversees the whole production whilst directing and writing it, he never lets me down and for this feature film, a biopic about the life of J. Robert Oppenheimer, a theoretical physicist who was pivotal in developing the first nuclear weapons as part of the Manhattan Project, and thereby ushering in the Atomic Age. What we get is a three hour biopic of Oppenheimer's life and in my opinion each minute and each scene is used to the fullest. My girlfriend thought it was too long though so I think it's a preference. You could say the black and white scenes which have a different perspective character entirely, to be unnecessary for the story told and that's fair, but in my opinion it's a perspective character which is needed. Stories can easily become biased but with a perspective character like Strauss makes us see how others see Robert Oppenheimer and it only helps the story Christopher Nolan is telling. Any fan of Christopher Nolan knows how he likes a non linear story, he does it here and It's done perfectly. Alternating between Oppenheimer's story from Cambridge to Los Alamos, his security hearing in 1954, and Strauss' confirmation hearing in 1959.",/review/rw9215422/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
135,20 July 2023,sosrivi,9," Just got amazed |
|
","Oppenheimer is not solely based on the Trinity. It's entirely political drama. Just a reminder to the audience of how obsessed humans are with power and fame. Music is the true hero of Oppenheimer's film. Every highest point throughout the film causes enormous tension. Everyone did an excellent job. The visual grandeur of Trinity underwhelmed me, but the music helped to compensate. Nolan has once again demonstrated his ability to present a political drama. Where all of the mental state were handled flawlessly. Overall, a remarkable image and historical significance that should never be forgotten. The film will leave you speechless.",/review/rw9202920/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
136,19 July 2023,rayanenaffati,10," Now I am become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds. |
|
","""Oppenheimer"" by Christopher Nolan is a film that delves deep into the consequences of the atomic bomb, focusing on Oppenheimer's perspective. This film requires a genuine passion for physics or history to fully appreciate its subtleties and biographical content. |
|
Not worth the extra money spent on IMAX |
|
For those of you expecting massive explosions and thundering sounds of the bombs dropped on the two cities will be sorely disappointed. Overall a great movie spending great amount of time and detail exploring the psyche behind the creator of the Atomic bomb. Science nerds will catch on to same major name drops besides Einstein and be responsible to explain to the normies what Nuclear Fission means. |
|
'Classic Nolan Art' |
|
Nolan yet again proved that why he's one of the finest directors till date with 0 disappointing movies.. Oppenheimer is exceptional..! Brilliant at performance level..terrifying and horrifying tense music..highly convincing screenplay..terrific and beautiful visuals..dark and complex nature (not comparable toll to other Nolan classics)... |
|
Literally Nolan itself - school of masterpiece arts .. |
|
Oppenheimer is very great epic and non linear..It will sure shot very horrific movie not for every audience! If you are dying to watch pure drama portion oriented cinema, If you want to see some terrifying psychological brilliance and If you're fan of anyone who are involved in this film - Go For It!! Oppenheimer should remain forever until the drama school and making exist. |
|
Sometimes a movie tries to mention everything and ends up saying nothing. |
|
Oppenheimer was just okay-good. It felt much too rushed at times, much too slow at others, but always forced. |
|
As a Nolan fan this was boring |
|
Boring movie, which is mostly political court room scenes. |
|
You've never seen a film like Oppenheimer |
|
","It's taken me a few days to be able to sit down and write down my thoughts about Christoper Nolan's newest big screen epic, the other part of the now infamous ""Barbenheimer"" double bill that has been re-writing record books over there launch weekends, having had this time to ponder and contemplate I am confident in saying that I've never seen a film quite like this biopic and while it's a film with flaws and components that don't stick their respective landings, Nolan's film is nevertheless a powerful, poignant and technically marvellous piece of original film-making that further establishes the esteemed director as a generational talent whose skill set is unrivalled.",/review/rw9210969/?ref_=tt_urv |
|
142,21 July 2023,talal-98358,10," Masterpiece |
|
","Oppenheimer is an awe-inspiring masterpiece that captivates from start to finish. Christopher Nolan's visionary direction and Cillian Murphy's stunning portrayal of J. Robert Oppenheimer bring history to life with an intense and emotionally charged performance. The film's cinematography is breathtaking, seamlessly transporting the audience to the World War II era. The intricate storytelling delves into the complexities of Oppenheimer's life, showcasing his brilliance as a scientist and the moral dilemmas he faced during the creation of the atomic bomb. Thought-provoking and intellectually stimulating, Oppenheimer challenges viewers to reflect on the consequences of scientific discoveries. The supporting cast's performances are outstanding, adding depth and nuance to this profound narrative. In all aspects, Oppenheimer is a triumph that leaves a lasting impact, reminding us of the power of cinema to enlighten and inspire. |
|
Christopher Nolan made a masterpiece. |
|
Is this the best movie Christopher Nolan ever made? I think so. This movie was a masterpiece. There wasn't a single scene I wanted to skip. I was too captivated by every part of this film. Cillian gives a performance that not only should bring him to his first Academy nomination but IMO should win him the whole thing. So did Downey. This was also the best performance by Emily Blunt I think ever. Matt Damon was fantastic, and Florence was too. Loved the small roles of 3 Academy Award winners with Affleck being terrifying with just a little screen time, Oldman being unrecognizable and Malek stealing the last 20 minutes of the film. Hoyte van Hoytema once again made fantastic cinematography one of his best and Ludwig Göransson ATE that score. I think it's one of the best scores in a film ever. Period! I have chills listening to those melodies even now. What a score. |
|
Time Jumbly (7.8) |
|
|
|
Boom. |
|
My goodness, what a disturbing film. I found the first hour to be very slow and a bit hard to follow. I definitely want to give it a second look so I can obtain a clearer understanding of all the different characters and moving parts. But once the intensity begins, it does not let up and it builds and builds and builds until the breathtaking conclusion. |
|
Great Biopic About a Man Who Changed Everything |
|
|
|
Politics Of The Bomb |
|
Might sound absolutely blasphemous but I think this is better watched at home. This is not against the quality of the filmmaking, which was understandably amazing but the tediousness of it being an unintentional Oscar bait. There are tooo many characters, most looking similar and too dialogue heavy to be watching in theatres. The soundmixing leaves a lot of the dialogue to the imagination as well. What I expected from it was not what I walked away with, this is not about the bomb rather than the political side of the bomb. So be prepared to sit through endless courtroom back-and-forth with characters introduced in almost every scene. If you are not already aware of exactly what happened to Oppenheimer esp his life after the bomb, you're gonna have a really hard time understanding whats going on. Thats where the paradox lies, can it be a masterfully crafted movie if you lose your audience before the credits? Because it absolutely is and most around me absolutely were. And then if you are already aware of everything that happened to Oppenheimer was it really necessary to play the plot twist game with a certain character throughout the entire movie? The whole movie was a bit of oxymoron, you get to see what you prolly didnt want to and didnt get to see what you most wanted to. I'm talking about the bomb obviously, I was heavily disappointed by the absence of it. The saving grace was the amazing acting performance by RDJ and Emily Blunt who both should be receiving Oscar nominations. Cillian Murphy did a great job as well but there were many scenes where I felt like I was watching Tommy Shelby instead of Robert Oppenheimer. The best part of watching Cillian Murphy as Oppenheimer was when he had no dialogues because his eyes do a better job at portraying what Nolan was going for. There is surprisingly little of the Nolan practical effect mindbending scene that needs to be seen in cinemas. This was easier to follow and harder to watch than TENET. |
|
Another masterpiece by Christopher nolan |
|
|
|
Sound editing is the real hero of this film |
|
|
|
|