Update model_config.json

model_config.json

@@ -21,16 +21,15 @@
     "INFO_PROMPT_PATH": "data/prompts/prompt_info.txt",
     "peer_review_journals_path": "data/prompts/peer_review_journals.txt",
     "eq_network_journals_path": "data/prompts/eq_network_journals.txt",
-    "queries": [
-        "Is anything in the article shared (data, code)? Look for the words like Supporting, Additional, supplementary  information/code/material/datashar -ing/-ed/-e, available, reproducibility and similar  + links, appendix",
-        "Has anything in the article been registered (in advance)?",
-        "Does the article follow any reporting guidelines? To answer this question, follow the 3 steps sequentially. If any of the steps is true, assign a score of 1 and if all the steps are false, give a score of 0. STEP 1. Look for ISRCTN registry. STEP 2. Look if it is published in either The Lancet, The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), British Medical Journal (BMJ), Annals of Internal Medicine, Nature Medicine, or Journal of Clinical Oncology. STEP 3. Look for one of the following guidelines, CONSORT for randomized controlled trials, PRISMA for meta‐analyses or systematic reviews, MOOSE for Meta-analyses of observational studies, STARD for diagnostic/prognostic studies, ARRIVE for animal pre-clinical studies, STROBE observational studies,SPIRIT for study protocols, CARE for case reports, AGREE for clinical practice guidelines, SRQR for qualitative researches,SQUIRE for quality improvement studies, SPIRIT Statement: Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials, PRIMER Collaboration: PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, MIBBI: Minimum Information for Biological and Biomedical Investigations, COREQ: Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research, MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) reproducibility checklist is not a traditional reporting guideline like CONSORT or PRISMA. Instead, it's a tool designed to enhance the reproducibility and transparency of scientific research, REMARK (Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies).",
-        "Is the methodology described in detail (where, when, how, what, who)?",
-        "Is the data collection processes described in detail (where, when, how, what, who)?",
-        "Is there any sample description? eg. size, demographics, recruitment, in-/exclusion criteria",
-        "Does the article describe the data analysis process?",
-        "Were measures taken to avoid or minimize systematic bias?",
-        "Has the article been published in a journal?"],
+    "queries": ["Does the article share any data or code? Look for terms related to supplementary materials or reproducibility.",
+      "Has the study or any data in the article been registered in advance?",
+      "Does the article adhere to specific reporting guidelines such as ISRCTN, CONSORT, PRISMA, MOOSE, STARD, ARRIVE, STROBE, SPIRIT, CARE, AGREE, SRQR, SQUIRE, MDAR, REMARK?",
+      "Is the article's methodology described in detail, including where, when, how, what, and who?",
+      "Are the data collection processes described in detail, including where, when, how, what, and who?",
+      "Does the article provide a detailed description of the sample, including size, demographics, recruitment, and criteria?",
+      "Does the article describe the data analysis process in detail?",
+      "Does the article discuss measures taken to avoid or minimize systematic bias?",
+      "Has the article been published in a journal?"],
     "criteria": [
         "Data and code sharing.",
         "Has anything in the article been registered (in advance)?",