Can you explain Section 108, which is about abettor?
Section 108 defines an abettor, stating that a person abets an offence who abets either the commission of an offence or the commission of an act which would be an offence if committed by a person capable by law of committing an offence, with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.

Explanations and illustrations are provided for better clarity. Explanation 1 mentions that the abetment of the illegal omission of an act may amount to an offence even if the abettor is not bound to do that act. Explanation 2 clarifies that to constitute the offence of abetment, it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should be caused. [Chapter 5, Section 108]