What are some potential implications of this amendment for the future of the National Capital Territory?
Some potential implications of this amendment for the future of the National Capital Territory are:

1. The Legislative Assembly will have greater autonomy to make laws for the whole or any part of the National Capital Territory with respect to matters enumerated in the State List or Concurrent List, except those related to Entries 1, 2, and 18 of the State List and Entries 64, 65, and 66 of that List in so far as they relate to the said Entries 1, 2, and 18.

2. Parliament will still have the power to make laws with respect to any matter for a Union territory or any part thereof, which may lead to potential conflicts between the Legislative Assembly and Parliament on certain matters.

3. In case of repugnancy between a law made by the Legislative Assembly and a law made by Parliament or an earlier law, the law made by Parliament or the earlier law shall prevail, making the law made by the Legislative Assembly void to the extent of the repugnancy. However, if a law made by the Legislative Assembly has been reserved for the consideration of the President and receives his assent, that law will prevail in the National Capital Territory.

4. Parliament can still enact laws at any time with respect to the same matter, including adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law made by the Legislative Assembly. This implies that the Legislative Assembly's autonomy may be limited and subject to the Parliament's oversight.