Can a party appealing to the Supreme Court argue that the interpretation of the Constitution was wrongly decided in their case?
Yes, a party appealing to the Supreme Court can argue that the interpretation of the Constitution was wrongly decided in their case. This is mentioned in clause (2) of Article 134, which states: "Notwithstanding anything in article 132, any party appealing to the Supreme Court under clause (1) may urge as one of the grounds in such appeal that a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution has been wrongly decided."