What is the significance of omitting "or Rajpramukh" from s. 29 and Sch., ibid. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956)?
The significance of omitting "or Rajpramukh" from s. 29 and Sch., ibid. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956) is not explicitly stated in the provided context. It may be related to changes or amendments made to the relevant section of the Constitution, possibly affecting the powers or responsibilities of a Rajpramukh. However, without more context, it's difficult to determine the exact implications of this omission.