What does Section 109 state about the punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence and where no express provision is made for its punishment?
Section 109 states that whoever abets any offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence.

Explanation 1 defines that an act or offence is said to be committed in consequence of abetment when it is committed in consequence of the instigation, or in pursuance of the conspiracy, or with the aid which constitutes the abetment.

Illustrations are provided to further illustrate scenarios where abetment leads to the commission of an offence. [Chapter 5, Section 109]