What is the significance of omitting "or Rajpramukh, as the case may be" by s. 29 and Sch.?
The omission of "or Rajpramukh, as the case may be" by s. 29 and Sch. effectively removes the role or position of a "Rajpramukh" in the context provided. It seems that this was done to streamline and clarify the roles and responsibilities within the system mentioned in the context, possibly by consolidating authority under a single position or body.