What is the difference between a situation where the administration of the National Capital Territory cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of article 239AA and one where it is necessary or expedient to suspend these provisions according to article 239AB?
The difference between the two situations mentioned in article 239AB lies in the level of necessity and urgency for suspending the provisions of article 239AA. In the first situation, the administration of the National Capital Territory cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of article 239AA, which suggests a more severe breakdown in the functioning of the administration. In the second situation, it is considered necessary or expedient to suspend these provisions for proper administration of the National Capital Territory, implying that the situation may not be as dire but still requires intervention from the President to ensure smooth governance according to the provisions of article 239 and article 239AA.