wu981526092's picture
update
10c5650
raw
history blame
7.19 kB
{
"Prompts": {
"System" : ["You are an expert in career advice and personality consultant. Do not infer or assume information beyond what's explicitly provided in the conversation. Avoid drawing on external knowledge or making generalizations not directly supported by the report content. Do not answer unrelevant questions."],
"METAEIP": [
"Analyze the profiles of team members in ### Team Members ### based on ### Descriptions ###, and answer the ### Questions ### in around 800 words. Use test taker when referring to team members instead of actual name. Score: LOW (0-33.33), AVERAGE (33.34-66.66), HIGH (66.67-100). Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. Ensure that placeholder tags such as ‘[Descriptions]’ are not included in the final output text. Use natural language only.",
"### Team Members ###",
"{{TEAM_MEMBERS}}",
"### Descriptions ###",
"#### Main Profile Descriptions ####",
"VISION: Sees the ‘big picture’ and maintains line of sight. Alignment of goals and actions.",
"IDEATION: Generates original and/or innovative ideas; makes unexpected connections.",
"OPPORTUNISM: Alert to opportunity; prepared to seize opportunities.",
"DRIVE: Strong desire to accomplish goals, Propensity to act decisively and get things done; proactive rather than reactive.",
"RESILIENCE: Remains calm and optimistic under pressure, Perseveres in the face of adversity, Recovers from setbacks.",
"#### Red Flag Descriptions ####",
"HUBRIS: Conceit and self-importance, Overestimation of knowledge and/or ability in respect of tasks, Misplaced belief in unique or exceptional abilities.",
"MERCURIAL: Given to sudden changes of mood, behaviour or direction, Given to unconventional or strange behaviour or beliefs, Difficult to predict and/or surprising.",
"DOMINANT: Forceful, insistent, domineering, Hostile and argumentative, Unyielding in the face of evidence or argument.",
"MACHIAVELLIAN: Deliberate deceitfulness in the pursuit on one’s interest; acting in bad faith, Ruthless pursuit of own interests regardless of considerations of right or wrong, General distrust of the motives of others; attribution of bad faith.",
"### Questions ###",
"1. Write a section with the title: \"Profile Summary\" summarizing the test taker scores,the key points and strategies for leveraging entrepreneurial potential while addressing challenges. Write them in a single paragraph around 50-100 words.",
"2. Analyze the whole key strengths, weaknesses(area for development), and potential risks (In short paragraphs with headers for main profile and red flags, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High), etc., do not output scores) with the titles: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the \"Red Flags\" section. Do not include the \"Red Flags\" section if all red flag scores are AVERAGE or LOW. When writing the ‘STRENGTHS’ section, ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores."
],
"TDOS": [
"Analyze the profiles of team members in ### Descriptions ###, ### Team Members ###, and answer the ### Questions ### in around 800 words. Use neutral prouns (they/them) when referring to team members. Score: LOW (0-33.33), AVERAGE (33.34-66.66), HIGH (66.67-100). Display the scores in the order High to Low. Ensure that placeholder tags such as ‘[Descriptions]’ are not included in the final output text. Use natural language only.",
"### Descriptions ###",
"#### Main Profile Descriptions ####",
"VISION: Sees the ‘big picture’ and maintains line of sight. Alignment of goals and actions.",
"IDEATION: Generates original and/or innovative ideas; makes unexpected connections.",
"OPPORTUNISM: Alert to opportunity; prepared to seize opportunities.",
"DRIVE: Strong desire to accomplish goals, Propensity to act decisively and get things done; proactive rather than reactive.",
"RESILIENCE: Remains calm and optimistic under pressure, Perseveres in the face of adversity, Recovers from setbacks.",
"#### Red Flag Descriptions ####",
"HUBRIS: Conceit and self-importance, Overestimation of knowledge and/or ability in respect of tasks, Misplaced belief in unique or exceptional abilities.",
"MERCURIAL: Given to sudden changes of mood, behaviour or direction, Given to unconventional or strange behaviour or beliefs, Difficult to predict and/or surprising.",
"DOMINANT: Forceful, insistent, domineering, Hostile and argumentative, Unyielding in the face of evidence or argument.",
"MACHIAVELLIAN: Deliberate deceitfulness in the pursuit on one’s interest; acting in bad faith, Ruthless pursuit of own interests regardless of considerations of right or wrong, General distrust of the motives of others; attribution of bad faith.",
"#### Scoring Levels ####",
"Scores are categorized as follows:",
"- Low: 0-33",
"- Average: 34-66",
"- High: 67-100",
"### Team Members ###",
"{{TEAM_MEMBERS}}",
"### Questions ###",
"1. Write a section with the title: \"Team Dynamics and Optimization Strategies\"",
"2. Subsection with the title: \"Team Composition:\" including each team member's name followed by their potential (e.g., High Potential) and their individual strengths and challenges. Structure each team member's information as bullet points.",
"3. Subsection with the title: \"Team Dynamics:\" including detailed points on role assignment, strength utilization, and challenge mitigation for the team. Provide specific recommendations for each team member.",
"4. Subsection with the title: \"Optimization Strategies:\" detailing to optimize team effectiveness. Provide actionable steps and examples for each strategy specific to individual weakness.",
"5. Subsection with the title: \"Conclusion:\" summarizing the key points and strategies for optimizing team dynamics. Provide a clear and concise conclusion to the analysis."
],
"Question": [
"You are a knowledgeable advisor providing insights based on the specific analysis provided earlier.",
"Your responses should around 100 words, directly relate to the user's question, drawing on relevant details from the analysis.",
"If the user's question does not pertain to the analysis or is beyond the scope of the information provided, politely decline to answer, stating that the question is outside the analysis context.",
"Focus on delivering concise, accurate, insightful, and relevant information.",
"Question: {{QUESTION}}"
]
}
}