| { | |
| "Prompts": { | |
| "System" : ["You are an expert in career advice and personality consultant. Do not infer or assume information beyond what's explicitly provided in the conversation. Avoid drawing on external knowledge or making generalizations not directly supported by the report content. Do not answer unrelevant questions."], | |
| "METAEIP": [ | |
| "Analyze the profiles of team members in ### Team Members ### based on ### Descriptions ###, and answer the ### Questions ### in around 800 words. Use neutral prouns (they/them) when referring to team members. Score: LOW (0-33.33), AVERAGE (33.34-66.66), HIGH (66.67-100).", | |
| "### Team Members ###", | |
| "{{TEAM_MEMBERS}}", | |
| "### Descriptions ###", | |
| "#### Main Profile Descriptions ####", | |
| "VISION: Sees the ‘big picture’ and maintains line of sight. Alignment of goals and actions.", | |
| "IDEATION: Generates original and/or innovative ideas; makes unexpected connections.", | |
| "OPPORTUNISM: Alert to opportunity; prepared to seize opportunities.", | |
| "DRIVE: Strong desire to accomplish goals, Propensity to act decisively and get things done; proactive rather than reactive.", | |
| "RESILIENCE: Remains calm and optimistic under pressure, Perseveres in the face of adversity, Recovers from setbacks.", | |
| "#### Red Flag Descriptions ####", | |
| "HUBRIS: Conceit and self-importance, Overestimation of knowledge and/or ability in respect of tasks, Misplaced belief in unique or exceptional abilities.", | |
| "MERCURIAL: Given to sudden changes of mood, behaviour or direction, Given to unconventional or strange behaviour or beliefs, Difficult to predict and/or surprising.", | |
| "DOMINANT: Forceful, insistent, domineering, Hostile and argumentative, Unyielding in the face of evidence or argument.", | |
| "MACHIAVELLIAN: Deliberate deceitfulness in the pursuit on one’s interest; acting in bad faith, Ruthless pursuit of own interests regardless of considerations of right or wrong, General distrust of the motives of others; attribution of bad faith.", | |
| "### Questions ###", | |
| "1. Write a section with the title: \"Profile Summary\" summarizing the test taker scores,the key points and strategies for leveraging entrepreneurial potential while addressing challenges. Write them in a single paragraph around 50-100 words.", | |
| "2. Analyze the whole key strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks (In short paragraphs with headers for main profile and red flags, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High), etc., do not output scores) with the titles: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\", \"WEAKNESSES\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the \"Red Flags\" section. Do not include the \"Red Flags\" section if all red flag scores are AVERAGE or LOW." | |
| ], | |
| "TDOS": [ | |
| "Analyze the profiles of team members in ### Descriptions ###, ### Team Members ###, and answer the ### Questions ### in around 800 words. Use neutral prouns (they/them) when referring to team members. Score: LOW (0-33.33), AVERAGE (33.34-66.66), HIGH (66.67-100).", | |
| "### Descriptions ###", | |
| "#### Main Profile Descriptions ####", | |
| "VISION: Sees the ‘big picture’ and maintains line of sight. Alignment of goals and actions.", | |
| "IDEATION: Generates original and/or innovative ideas; makes unexpected connections.", | |
| "OPPORTUNISM: Alert to opportunity; prepared to seize opportunities.", | |
| "DRIVE: Strong desire to accomplish goals, Propensity to act decisively and get things done; proactive rather than reactive.", | |
| "RESILIENCE: Remains calm and optimistic under pressure, Perseveres in the face of adversity, Recovers from setbacks.", | |
| "#### Red Flag Descriptions ####", | |
| "HUBRIS: Conceit and self-importance, Overestimation of knowledge and/or ability in respect of tasks, Misplaced belief in unique or exceptional abilities.", | |
| "MERCURIAL: Given to sudden changes of mood, behaviour or direction, Given to unconventional or strange behaviour or beliefs, Difficult to predict and/or surprising.", | |
| "DOMINANT: Forceful, insistent, domineering, Hostile and argumentative, Unyielding in the face of evidence or argument.", | |
| "MACHIAVELLIAN: Deliberate deceitfulness in the pursuit on one’s interest; acting in bad faith, Ruthless pursuit of own interests regardless of considerations of right or wrong, General distrust of the motives of others; attribution of bad faith.", | |
| "#### Scoring Levels ####", | |
| "Scores are categorized as follows:", | |
| "- Low: 0-33", | |
| "- Average: 34-66", | |
| "- High: 67-100", | |
| "### Team Members ###", | |
| "{{TEAM_MEMBERS}}", | |
| "### Questions ###", | |
| "1. Write a section with the title: \"Team Dynamics and Optimization Strategies\"", | |
| "2. Subsection with the title: \"Team Composition:\" including each team member's name followed by their potential (e.g., High Potential) and their individual strengths and challenges. Structure each team member's information as bullet points.", | |
| "3. Subsection with the title: \"Team Dynamics:\" including detailed points on role assignment, strength utilization, and challenge mitigation for the team. Provide specific recommendations for each team member.", | |
| "4. Subsection with the title: \"Optimization Strategies:\" detailing to optimize team effectiveness. Provide actionable steps and examples for each strategy specific to individual weakness.", | |
| "5. Subsection with the title: \"Conclusion:\" summarizing the key points and strategies for optimizing team dynamics. Provide a clear and concise conclusion to the analysis." | |
| ], | |
| "TestTakersSummary": [ | |
| "Analyze {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s profile in ### Bio Information ###, ## Main Profile ###, ### Red Flags Profile ###, and answer the ### Questions ### with around 800 words length.", | |
| "### Bio Information of {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}} ###", | |
| "{{BIO}}", | |
| "### Main Profile ###", | |
| "{{PROFILE}}", | |
| "### Red Flags Profile ###", | |
| "{{REDFLAGS_PROFILE}}", | |
| "### Questions ###", | |
| "1. Write an overall short summary with the title: \"Profile summary (You)\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name.", | |
| "2. Analyze key strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High),.....) with the title: \"Strengths, Weaknesses & Risks\" in {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in the leadership context, considering relationship between trait scores i.e. what do the combination of scores tell us; If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the Risks section, do not care about the risk if the socre is AVERAGE or LOW. When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name.", | |
| "Your response for each question should be very indepth and professional and organized under clear headings, with each point supported by specific examples from the {individual_name}'s profiles and provide the individual at least 5 points for each question. Remember do not write any conclusion." | |
| ], | |
| "ManagersSummary": [ | |
| "Analyze {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s profile in ### Bio Information ###, ## Main Profile ###, ### Red Flags Profile ###, and answer the ### Questions ### with around 800 words length.", | |
| "### Bio Information of {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}} ###", | |
| "{{BIO}}", | |
| "### Main Profile ###", | |
| "{{PROFILE}}", | |
| "### Red Flags Profile ###", | |
| "{{REDFLAGS_PROFILE}}", | |
| "### Questions ###", | |
| "1. Write an overall short summary with the title: \"Profile summary\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, use name \"test-taker\" and do not include their real name, gender, tenure (length of service) or role.", | |
| "2. Analyze key strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High),.....) with the title: \"Strengths, Weaknesses & Risks\" in {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in the leadership context, considering relationship between trait scores i.e. what do the combination of scores tell us; If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the Risks section, do not care about the risk if the socre is AVERAGE or LOW. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\" instead of their name.", | |
| "Your response for each question should be very indepth and professional and organized under clear headings, with each point supported by specific examples from the {individual_name}'s profiles and provide the individual at least 5 points for each question. Remember do not write any conclusion." | |
| ], | |
| "Question": [ | |
| "You are a knowledgeable advisor providing insights based on the specific analysis provided earlier.", | |
| "Your responses should around 100 words, directly relate to the user's question, drawing on relevant details from the analysis.", | |
| "If the user's question does not pertain to the analysis or is beyond the scope of the information provided, politely decline to answer, stating that the question is outside the analysis context.", | |
| "Focus on delivering concise, accurate, insightful, and relevant information.", | |
| "Question: {{QUESTION}}" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| } | |