Jzuluaga's picture
Update README.md
f0e430d
|
raw
history blame
9.79 kB
metadata
license: apache-2.0
tags:
  - automatic-speech-recognition
  - generated_from_trainer
metrics:
  - wer
model-index:
  - name: wav2vec2-large-960h-lv60-self-en-atc-atcosim
    results:
      - task:
          type: automatic-speech-recognition
          name: Speech Recognition
        dataset:
          type: Jzuluaga/atcosim_corpus
          name: ATCOSIM dataset (Air Traffic Control Communications)
          config: test
          split: test
        metrics:
          - type: wer
            value: 1.67
            name: TEST WER
            verified: false

wav2vec2-large-960h-lv60-self-en-atc-atcosim

This model is a fine-tuned version of facebook/wav2vec2-large-960h-lv60-self on the ATCOSIM corpus.

It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:

  • Loss: 0.0850
  • Wer: 0.0167 (1.67% WER)

Paper: How Does Pre-trained Wav2Vec 2.0 Perform on Domain Shifted ASR? An Extensive Benchmark on Air Traffic Control Communications.

Authors: Juan Zuluaga-Gomez, Amrutha Prasad, Iuliia Nigmatulina, Saeed Sarfjoo, Petr Motlicek, Matthias Kleinert, Hartmut Helmke, Oliver Ohneiser, Qingran Zhan

Abstract: Recent work on self-supervised pre-training focus on leveraging large-scale unlabeled speech data to build robust end-to-end (E2E)acoustic models (AM) that can be later fine-tuned on downstream tasks e.g., automatic speech recognition (ASR). Yet, few works investigated the impact on performance when the data properties substantially differ between the pre-training and fine-tuning phases, termed domain shift. We target this scenario by analyzing the robustness of Wav2Vec 2.0 and XLS-R models on downstream ASR for a completely unseen domain, air traffic control (ATC) communications. We benchmark these two models on several open-source and challenging ATC databases with signal-to-noise ratio between 5 and 20 dB. Relative word error rate (WER) reductions between 20% to 40% are obtained in comparison to hybrid-based ASR baselines by only fine-tuning E2E acoustic models with a smaller fraction of labeled data. We analyze WERs on the low-resource scenario and gender bias carried by one ATC dataset.

Code — GitHub repository: https://github.com/idiap/w2v2-air-traffic

Usage

You can use our Google Colab notebook to run and evaluate our model: https://github.com/idiap/w2v2-air-traffic/blob/master/src/eval_xlsr_atc_model.ipynb

(you need to change the MODEL_ID param to MODEL_ID=Jzuluaga/wav2vec2-large-960h-lv60-self-en-atc-atcosim)

Intended uses & limitations

This model was fine-tuned on air traffic control data. We don't expect that it keeps the same performance on some others datasets, e.g., LibriSpeech or CommonVoice.

Training and evaluation data

See Table 1 (page 3) in our paper: How Does Pre-trained Wav2Vec 2.0 Perform on Domain Shifted ASR? An Extensive Benchmark on Air Traffic Control Communications. We described there the partitions of how to use our model.

Writing your own inference script

If you use language model, you need to install the KenLM bindings with:

conda activate your_environment
pip install https://github.com/kpu/kenlm/archive/master.zip

The snippet of code:

from datasets import load_dataset, load_metric, Audio
import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForCTC, Wav2Vec2Processor, Wav2Vec2ProcessorWithLM
import torchaudio.functional as F

USE_LM = False
DATASET_ID = "Jzuluaga/atcosim_corpus"
MODEL_ID = "Jzuluaga/wav2vec2-large-960h-lv60-self-en-atc-atcosim"

# 1. Load the dataset
# we only load the 'test' partition, however, if you want to load the 'train' partition, you can change it accordingly
atcosim_corpus_test = load_dataset(DATASET_ID, "test", split="test")

# 2. Load the model
model = AutoModelForCTC.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID)

# 3. Load the processors, we offer support with LM, which should yield better resutls
if USE_LM:
    processor = Wav2Vec2ProcessorWithLM.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID)
else:
    processor = Wav2Vec2Processor.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID)

# 4. Format the test sample
sample = next(iter(atcosim_corpus_test))
file_sampling_rate = sample['audio']['sampling_rate']

# resample if neccessary
if file_sampling_rate != 16000:
    resampled_audio = F.resample(torch.tensor(sample["audio"]["array"]), file_sampling_rate, 16000).numpy()
else:
    resampled_audio = torch.tensor(sample["audio"]["array"]).numpy()

input_values = processor(resampled_audio, return_tensors="pt").input_values

# 5. Run the forward pass in the model
with torch.no_grad():
    logits = model(input_values).logits
    
# get the transcription with processor
if USE_LM:
    transcription = processor.batch_decode(logits.numpy()).text
else:
    pred_ids = torch.argmax(logits, dim=-1)
    transcription = processor.batch_decode(pred_ids)

# print the output
print(transcription)

Cite us

If you use this code for your research, please cite our paper with:

@article{zuluaga2022bertraffic,
    title={How Does Pre-trained Wav2Vec2. 0 Perform on Domain Shifted ASR? An Extensive Benchmark on Air Traffic Control Communications},
    author={Zuluaga-Gomez, Juan and Prasad, Amrutha and Nigmatulina, Iuliia and Sarfjoo, Saeed and Motlicek, Petr and Kleinert, Matthias and Helmke, Hartmut and Ohneiser, Oliver and Zhan, Qingran},
    journal={IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), Doha, Qatar},
    year={2022}
  }

and,

@article{zuluaga2022bertraffic,
  title={BERTraffic: BERT-based Joint Speaker Role and Speaker Change Detection for Air Traffic Control Communications},
  author={Zuluaga-Gomez, Juan and Sarfjoo, Seyyed Saeed and Prasad, Amrutha and Nigmatulina, Iuliia and Motlicek, Petr and Ondre, Karel and Ohneiser, Oliver and Helmke, Hartmut},
  journal={IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), Doha, Qatar},
  year={2022}
  }

Training procedure

Training hyperparameters

The following hyperparameters were used during training:

  • learning_rate: 0.0005
  • train_batch_size: 24
  • eval_batch_size: 24
  • seed: 42
  • gradient_accumulation_steps: 4
  • total_train_batch_size: 96
  • optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08
  • lr_scheduler_type: linear
  • lr_scheduler_warmup_steps: 500
  • training_steps: 20000
  • mixed_precision_training: Native AMP

Training results

Training Loss Epoch Step Validation Loss Wer
1.4757 6.41 500 0.0614 0.0347
0.0624 12.82 1000 0.0525 0.0277
0.0388 19.23 1500 0.0693 0.0241
0.03 25.64 2000 0.0666 0.0244
0.0235 32.05 2500 0.0604 0.0260
0.0226 38.46 3000 0.0625 0.0230
0.0163 44.87 3500 0.0603 0.0195
0.0157 51.28 4000 0.0628 0.0209
0.0152 57.69 4500 0.0692 0.0238
0.0122 64.1 5000 0.0607 0.0210
0.011 70.51 5500 0.0608 0.0213
0.0114 76.92 6000 0.0681 0.0211
0.0106 83.33 6500 0.0613 0.0210
0.0081 89.74 7000 0.0654 0.0196
0.0078 96.15 7500 0.0612 0.0191
0.0082 102.56 8000 0.0758 0.0237
0.0078 108.97 8500 0.0664 0.0206
0.0075 115.38 9000 0.0658 0.0197
0.0052 121.79 9500 0.0669 0.0218
0.0054 128.21 10000 0.0695 0.0211
0.0053 134.62 10500 0.0726 0.0227
0.0046 141.03 11000 0.0702 0.0212
0.0043 147.44 11500 0.0846 0.0200
0.0041 153.85 12000 0.0764 0.0200
0.0032 160.26 12500 0.0785 0.0201
0.0028 166.67 13000 0.0839 0.0197
0.0035 173.08 13500 0.0785 0.0210
0.0027 179.49 14000 0.0730 0.0188
0.002 185.9 14500 0.0794 0.0193
0.002 192.31 15000 0.0859 0.0211
0.0019 198.72 15500 0.0727 0.0183
0.0017 205.13 16000 0.0784 0.0187
0.0016 211.54 16500 0.0801 0.0196
0.0014 217.95 17000 0.0821 0.0185
0.0011 224.36 17500 0.0822 0.0176
0.001 230.77 18000 0.0856 0.0171
0.001 237.18 18500 0.0792 0.0176
0.001 243.59 19000 0.0826 0.0173
0.0006 250.0 19500 0.0854 0.0170
0.0007 256.41 20000 0.0850 0.0167

Framework versions

  • Transformers 4.24.0
  • Pytorch 1.13.0+cu117
  • Datasets 2.6.1
  • Tokenizers 0.13.2