Question Regarding the Legality of Using CC BY-NC 4.0 License in This Project

#9
by jiacheo - opened

Hello,

First of all, thank you for your contributions to the community. I have been reviewing and using this project, and I noticed that it is based on Meta Llama 3 and has been released under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. However, I have some concerns about the legality of using this license, especially in terms of compliance with the original project’s license.

According to the Meta Llama 3 Community License Agreement, this agreement grants users a “non-exclusive, worldwide, non-transferable, royalty-free limited license” to use, reproduce, distribute, copy, create derivative works of, and modify the Llama Materials.

However, the license also specifies the following requirements:

1.	Section 1.b: Redistribution and Use
•	“If you distribute or make available the Llama Materials (or any derivative works thereof), including another AI model, you shall provide a copy of this Agreement with any such Llama Materials; and prominently display ‘Built with Meta Llama 3’ on a related website, user interface, blog post, about page, or product documentation.”
•	The license does not impose general restrictions on commercial use, except as outlined in Section 2 regarding additional commercial terms.
2.	Section 2: Additional Commercial Terms
•	If an entity or its affiliates have more than 700 million monthly active users, they must request a special license from Meta to continue exercising the rights under this agreement.

Given these clauses, I have the following concerns:

1.	Commercial Use Restriction: By choosing the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, which explicitly restricts commercial use, there may be a conflict with the original Meta Llama 3 license, which does not impose a blanket restriction on commercial use except under specific conditions. Changing the license to CC BY-NC 4.0 might violate the terms of the Meta Llama 3 license, particularly in restricting the commercial use of derivative works.
2.	License Compatibility: The terms of the Meta Llama 3 license and those of CC BY-NC 4.0 might be incompatible, especially regarding the redistribution and use of derivative works. Could this lead to potential legal non-compliance with the Meta Llama 3 community license requirements?

I would appreciate clarification on whether explicit permission from Meta has been obtained to use the CC BY-NC 4.0 license for this project. If not, does this license choice align with the Meta Llama 3 community license?

Thank you for your hard work, and I hope this issue can be addressed to ensure the project remains compliant with all applicable licenses.

Best regards,
Thanks again!

Nexusflow org

Thank you for raising this point. We have been working on this and just got to update our license here to be fully compliant with the llama3 license: Nexusflow Research License

banghua changed discussion status to closed

Sign up or log in to comment