|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
library_name: transformers |
|
license: gemma |
|
extra_gated_heading: Access Gemma on Hugging Face |
|
extra_gated_prompt: To access Gemma on Hugging Face, you’re required to review and |
|
agree to Google’s usage license. To do this, please ensure you’re logged-in to Hugging |
|
Face and click below. Requests are processed immediately. |
|
extra_gated_button_content: Acknowledge license |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
![](https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXfrlKyH6elkxeyrKw4el9j8V3IOQLsqTVngg19Akt6se1Eq2xaocCEjOmc1w8mq5ENHeYfpzRWjYB8D4mtmMPsiH7QyX_Ii1kEM7bk8eMzO68y9JEuDcoJxJBgbNDzRbTdVXylN9_zjrEposDwsoN7csKiD?key=xt3VSDoCbmTY7o-cwwOFwQ) |
|
|
|
# QuantFactory/gemma-2b-GGUF |
|
This is quantized version of [google/gemma-2b](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-2b) created using llama.cpp |
|
|
|
# Original Model Card |
|
|
|
|
|
# Gemma Model Card |
|
|
|
**Model Page**: [Gemma](https://ai.google.dev/gemma/docs) |
|
|
|
This model card corresponds to the 2B base version of the Gemma model. You can also visit the model card of the [7B base model](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-7b), [7B instruct model](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-7b-it), and [2B instruct model](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-2b-it). |
|
|
|
**Resources and Technical Documentation**: |
|
|
|
* [Gemma Technical Report](https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/gemma/gemma-report.pdf) |
|
* [Responsible Generative AI Toolkit](https://ai.google.dev/responsible) |
|
* [Gemma on Kaggle](https://www.kaggle.com/models/google/gemma) |
|
* [Gemma on Vertex Model Garden](https://console.cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/publishers/google/model-garden/335?version=gemma-2b-gg-hf) |
|
|
|
**Terms of Use**: [Terms](https://www.kaggle.com/models/google/gemma/license/consent/verify/huggingface?returnModelRepoId=google/gemma-2b) |
|
|
|
**Authors**: Google |
|
|
|
## Model Information |
|
|
|
Summary description and brief definition of inputs and outputs. |
|
|
|
### Description |
|
|
|
Gemma is a family of lightweight, state-of-the-art open models from Google, |
|
built from the same research and technology used to create the Gemini models. |
|
They are text-to-text, decoder-only large language models, available in English, |
|
with open weights, pre-trained variants, and instruction-tuned variants. Gemma |
|
models are well-suited for a variety of text generation tasks, including |
|
question answering, summarization, and reasoning. Their relatively small size |
|
makes it possible to deploy them in environments with limited resources such as |
|
a laptop, desktop or your own cloud infrastructure, democratizing access to |
|
state of the art AI models and helping foster innovation for everyone. |
|
|
|
### Context Length |
|
Models are trained on a context length of 8192 tokens. |
|
|
|
### Usage |
|
|
|
Below we share some code snippets on how to get quickly started with running the model. First make sure to `pip install -U transformers`, then copy the snippet from the section that is relevant for your usecase. |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Fine-tuning the model |
|
|
|
You can find fine-tuning scripts and notebook under the [`examples/` directory](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-7b/tree/main/examples) of [`google/gemma-7b`](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-7b) repository. To adapt it to this model, simply change the model-id to `google/gemma-2b`. |
|
In that repository, we provide: |
|
|
|
* A script to perform Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on UltraChat dataset using QLoRA |
|
* A script to perform SFT using FSDP on TPU devices |
|
* A notebook that you can run on a free-tier Google Colab instance to perform SFT on English quotes dataset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Running the model on a CPU |
|
|
|
|
|
```python |
|
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM |
|
|
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b") |
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b") |
|
|
|
input_text = "Write me a poem about Machine Learning." |
|
input_ids = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt") |
|
|
|
outputs = model.generate(**input_ids) |
|
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0])) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Running the model on a single / multi GPU |
|
|
|
|
|
```python |
|
# pip install accelerate |
|
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM |
|
|
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b") |
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b", device_map="auto") |
|
|
|
input_text = "Write me a poem about Machine Learning." |
|
input_ids = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda") |
|
|
|
outputs = model.generate(**input_ids) |
|
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0])) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Running the model on a GPU using different precisions |
|
|
|
* _Using `torch.float16`_ |
|
|
|
```python |
|
# pip install accelerate |
|
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM |
|
|
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b") |
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b", device_map="auto", revision="float16") |
|
|
|
input_text = "Write me a poem about Machine Learning." |
|
input_ids = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda") |
|
|
|
outputs = model.generate(**input_ids) |
|
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0])) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
* _Using `torch.bfloat16`_ |
|
|
|
```python |
|
# pip install accelerate |
|
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM |
|
|
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b") |
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b", device_map="auto", torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16) |
|
|
|
input_text = "Write me a poem about Machine Learning." |
|
input_ids = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda") |
|
|
|
outputs = model.generate(**input_ids) |
|
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0])) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
#### Quantized Versions through `bitsandbytes` |
|
|
|
* _Using 8-bit precision (int8)_ |
|
|
|
```python |
|
# pip install bitsandbytes accelerate |
|
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM, BitsAndBytesConfig |
|
|
|
quantization_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(load_in_8bit=True) |
|
|
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b") |
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b", quantization_config=quantization_config) |
|
|
|
input_text = "Write me a poem about Machine Learning." |
|
input_ids = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda") |
|
|
|
outputs = model.generate(**input_ids) |
|
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0])) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
* _Using 4-bit precision_ |
|
|
|
```python |
|
# pip install bitsandbytes accelerate |
|
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM, BitsAndBytesConfig |
|
|
|
quantization_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(load_in_4bit=True) |
|
|
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b") |
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("google/gemma-2b", quantization_config=quantization_config) |
|
|
|
input_text = "Write me a poem about Machine Learning." |
|
input_ids = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda") |
|
|
|
outputs = model.generate(**input_ids) |
|
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0])) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Other optimizations |
|
|
|
* _Flash Attention 2_ |
|
|
|
First make sure to install `flash-attn` in your environment `pip install flash-attn` |
|
|
|
```diff |
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( |
|
model_id, |
|
torch_dtype=torch.float16, |
|
+ attn_implementation="flash_attention_2" |
|
).to(0) |
|
``` |
|
|
|
### Inputs and outputs |
|
|
|
* **Input:** Text string, such as a question, a prompt, or a document to be |
|
summarized. |
|
* **Output:** Generated English-language text in response to the input, such |
|
as an answer to a question, or a summary of a document. |
|
|
|
## Model Data |
|
|
|
Data used for model training and how the data was processed. |
|
|
|
### Training Dataset |
|
|
|
These models were trained on a dataset of text data that includes a wide variety |
|
of sources, totaling 6 trillion tokens. Here are the key components: |
|
|
|
* Web Documents: A diverse collection of web text ensures the model is exposed |
|
to a broad range of linguistic styles, topics, and vocabulary. Primarily |
|
English-language content. |
|
* Code: Exposing the model to code helps it to learn the syntax and patterns of |
|
programming languages, which improves its ability to generate code or |
|
understand code-related questions. |
|
* Mathematics: Training on mathematical text helps the model learn logical |
|
reasoning, symbolic representation, and to address mathematical queries. |
|
|
|
The combination of these diverse data sources is crucial for training a powerful |
|
language model that can handle a wide variety of different tasks and text |
|
formats. |
|
|
|
### Data Preprocessing |
|
|
|
Here are the key data cleaning and filtering methods applied to the training |
|
data: |
|
|
|
* CSAM Filtering: Rigorous CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) filtering was |
|
applied at multiple stages in the data preparation process to ensure the |
|
exclusion of harmful and illegal content |
|
* Sensitive Data Filtering: As part of making Gemma pre-trained models safe and |
|
reliable, automated techniques were used to filter out certain personal |
|
information and other sensitive data from training sets. |
|
* Additional methods: Filtering based on content quality and safely in line with |
|
[our policies](https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/documents/2023_Google_AI_Principles_Progress_Update.pdf#page=11). |
|
|
|
## Implementation Information |
|
|
|
Details about the model internals. |
|
|
|
### Hardware |
|
|
|
Gemma was trained using the latest generation of |
|
[Tensor Processing Unit (TPU)](https://cloud.google.com/tpu/docs/intro-to-tpu) hardware (TPUv5e). |
|
|
|
Training large language models requires significant computational power. TPUs, |
|
designed specifically for matrix operations common in machine learning, offer |
|
several advantages in this domain: |
|
|
|
* Performance: TPUs are specifically designed to handle the massive computations |
|
involved in training LLMs. They can speed up training considerably compared to |
|
CPUs. |
|
* Memory: TPUs often come with large amounts of high-bandwidth memory, allowing |
|
for the handling of large models and batch sizes during training. This can |
|
lead to better model quality. |
|
* Scalability: TPU Pods (large clusters of TPUs) provide a scalable solution for |
|
handling the growing complexity of large foundation models. You can distribute |
|
training across multiple TPU devices for faster and more efficient processing. |
|
* Cost-effectiveness: In many scenarios, TPUs can provide a more cost-effective |
|
solution for training large models compared to CPU-based infrastructure, |
|
especially when considering the time and resources saved due to faster |
|
training. |
|
* These advantages are aligned with |
|
[Google's commitments to operate sustainably](https://sustainability.google/operating-sustainably/). |
|
|
|
### Software |
|
|
|
Training was done using [JAX](https://github.com/google/jax) and [ML Pathways](https://blog.google/technology/ai/introducing-pathways-next-generation-ai-architecture/ml-pathways). |
|
|
|
JAX allows researchers to take advantage of the latest generation of hardware, |
|
including TPUs, for faster and more efficient training of large models. |
|
|
|
ML Pathways is Google's latest effort to build artificially intelligent systems |
|
capable of generalizing across multiple tasks. This is specially suitable for |
|
[foundation models](https://ai.google/discover/foundation-models/), including large language models like |
|
these ones. |
|
|
|
Together, JAX and ML Pathways are used as described in the |
|
[paper about the Gemini family of models](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11805); "the 'single |
|
controller' programming model of Jax and Pathways allows a single Python |
|
process to orchestrate the entire training run, dramatically simplifying the |
|
development workflow." |
|
|
|
## Evaluation |
|
|
|
Model evaluation metrics and results. |
|
|
|
### Benchmark Results |
|
|
|
These models were evaluated against a large collection of different datasets and |
|
metrics to cover different aspects of text generation: |
|
|
|
| Benchmark | Metric | 2B Params | 7B Params | |
|
| ------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------- | --------- | |
|
| [MMLU](https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300) | 5-shot, top-1 | 42.3 | 64.3 | |
|
| [HellaSwag](https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07830) | 0-shot |71.4 | 81.2 | |
|
| [PIQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11641) | 0-shot | 77.3 | 81.2 | |
|
| [SocialIQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09728) | 0-shot | 49.7 | 51.8 | |
|
| [BooIQ](https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10044) | 0-shot | 69.4 | 83.2 | |
|
| [WinoGrande](https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10641) | partial score | 65.4 | 72.3 | |
|
| [CommonsenseQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00937) | 7-shot | 65.3 | 71.3 | |
|
| [OpenBookQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02789) | | 47.8 | 52.8 | |
|
| [ARC-e](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547) | | 73.2 | 81.5 | |
|
| [ARC-c](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547) | | 42.1 | 53.2 | |
|
| [TriviaQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.03551) | 5-shot | 53.2 | 63.4 | |
|
| [Natural Questions](https://github.com/google-research-datasets/natural-questions) | 5-shot | 12.5 | 23 | |
|
| [HumanEval](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374) | pass@1 | 22.0 | 32.3 | |
|
| [MBPP](https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07732) | 3-shot | 29.2 | 44.4 | |
|
| [GSM8K](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14168) | maj@1 | 17.7 | 46.4 | |
|
| [MATH](https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07732) | 4-shot | 11.8 | 24.3 | |
|
| [AGIEval](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06364) | | 24.2 | 41.7 | |
|
| [BIG-Bench](https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04615) | | 35.2 | 55.1 | |
|
| ------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------- | --------- | |
|
| **Average** | | **45.0** | **56.9** | |
|
|
|
## Ethics and Safety |
|
|
|
Ethics and safety evaluation approach and results. |
|
|
|
### Evaluation Approach |
|
|
|
Our evaluation methods include structured evaluations and internal red-teaming |
|
testing of relevant content policies. Red-teaming was conducted by a number of |
|
different teams, each with different goals and human evaluation metrics. These |
|
models were evaluated against a number of different categories relevant to |
|
ethics and safety, including: |
|
|
|
* Text-to-Text Content Safety: Human evaluation on prompts covering safety |
|
policies including child sexual abuse and exploitation, harassment, violence |
|
and gore, and hate speech. |
|
* Text-to-Text Representational Harms: Benchmark against relevant academic |
|
datasets such as [WinoBias](https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06876) and [BBQ Dataset](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08193v2). |
|
* Memorization: Automated evaluation of memorization of training data, including |
|
the risk of personally identifiable information exposure. |
|
* Large-scale harm: Tests for "dangerous capabilities," such as chemical, |
|
biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) risks. |
|
|
|
### Evaluation Results |
|
|
|
The results of ethics and safety evaluations are within acceptable thresholds |
|
for meeting [internal policies](https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/documents/2023_Google_AI_Principles_Progress_Update.pdf#page=11) for categories such as child |
|
safety, content safety, representational harms, memorization, large-scale harms. |
|
On top of robust internal evaluations, the results of well known safety |
|
benchmarks like BBQ, BOLD, Winogender, Winobias, RealToxicity, and TruthfulQA |
|
are shown here. |
|
|
|
**Update**: These numbers reflect the new numbers from the updated v1.1 IT models. For the original v1 numbers, please consult the technical report's appendix for the results. |
|
|
|
| Benchmark | Metric | Gemma v1.1 IT 2B | Gemma v1.1 IT 7B | |
|
| ------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------- | --------- | |
|
| [RealToxicity](https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11462) | average | 6.86 | 7.90 | |
|
| [BOLD](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11718) | | 45.57 | 49.08 | |
|
| [CrowS-Pairs](https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.154/) | top-1 | 45.82 | 51.33 | |
|
| [BBQ Ambig](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08193v2) | 1-shot, top-1 | 62.58 | 92.54 | |
|
| [BBQ Disambig](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08193v2) | top-1 | 54.62 | 71.99 | |
|
| [Winogender](https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09301) | top-1 | 51.25 | 54.17 | |
|
| [TruthfulQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07958) | | 31.81 | 44.84 | |
|
| [Winobias 1_2](https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06876) | | 56.12 | 59.09 | |
|
| [Winobias 2_2](https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06876) | | 91.10 | 92.23 | |
|
| [Toxigen](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.09509) | | 29.77 | 39.59 | |
|
| ------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------- | --------- | |
|
|
|
|
|
## Usage and Limitations |
|
|
|
These models have certain limitations that users should be aware of. |
|
|
|
### Intended Usage |
|
|
|
Open Large Language Models (LLMs) have a wide range of applications across |
|
various industries and domains. The following list of potential uses is not |
|
comprehensive. The purpose of this list is to provide contextual information |
|
about the possible use-cases that the model creators considered as part of model |
|
training and development. |
|
|
|
* Content Creation and Communication |
|
* Text Generation: These models can be used to generate creative text formats |
|
such as poems, scripts, code, marketing copy, and email drafts. |
|
* Chatbots and Conversational AI: Power conversational interfaces for customer |
|
service, virtual assistants, or interactive applications. |
|
* Text Summarization: Generate concise summaries of a text corpus, research |
|
papers, or reports. |
|
* Research and Education |
|
* Natural Language Processing (NLP) Research: These models can serve as a |
|
foundation for researchers to experiment with NLP techniques, develop |
|
algorithms, and contribute to the advancement of the field. |
|
* Language Learning Tools: Support interactive language learning experiences, |
|
aiding in grammar correction or providing writing practice. |
|
* Knowledge Exploration: Assist researchers in exploring large bodies of text |
|
by generating summaries or answering questions about specific topics. |
|
|
|
### Limitations |
|
|
|
* Training Data |
|
* The quality and diversity of the training data significantly influence the |
|
model's capabilities. Biases or gaps in the training data can lead to |
|
limitations in the model's responses. |
|
* The scope of the training dataset determines the subject areas the model can |
|
handle effectively. |
|
* Context and Task Complexity |
|
* LLMs are better at tasks that can be framed with clear prompts and |
|
instructions. Open-ended or highly complex tasks might be challenging. |
|
* A model's performance can be influenced by the amount of context provided |
|
(longer context generally leads to better outputs, up to a certain point). |
|
* Language Ambiguity and Nuance |
|
* Natural language is inherently complex. LLMs might struggle to grasp subtle |
|
nuances, sarcasm, or figurative language. |
|
* Factual Accuracy |
|
* LLMs generate responses based on information they learned from their |
|
training datasets, but they are not knowledge bases. They may generate |
|
incorrect or outdated factual statements. |
|
* Common Sense |
|
* LLMs rely on statistical patterns in language. They might lack the ability |
|
to apply common sense reasoning in certain situations. |
|
|
|
### Ethical Considerations and Risks |
|
|
|
The development of large language models (LLMs) raises several ethical concerns. |
|
In creating an open model, we have carefully considered the following: |
|
|
|
* Bias and Fairness |
|
* LLMs trained on large-scale, real-world text data can reflect socio-cultural |
|
biases embedded in the training material. These models underwent careful |
|
scrutiny, input data pre-processing described and posterior evaluations |
|
reported in this card. |
|
* Misinformation and Misuse |
|
* LLMs can be misused to generate text that is false, misleading, or harmful. |
|
* Guidelines are provided for responsible use with the model, see the |
|
[Responsible Generative AI Toolkit](http://ai.google.dev/gemma/responsible). |
|
* Transparency and Accountability: |
|
* This model card summarizes details on the models' architecture, |
|
capabilities, limitations, and evaluation processes. |
|
* A responsibly developed open model offers the opportunity to share |
|
innovation by making LLM technology accessible to developers and researchers |
|
across the AI ecosystem. |
|
|
|
Risks identified and mitigations: |
|
|
|
* Perpetuation of biases: It's encouraged to perform continuous monitoring |
|
(using evaluation metrics, human review) and the exploration of de-biasing |
|
techniques during model training, fine-tuning, and other use cases. |
|
* Generation of harmful content: Mechanisms and guidelines for content safety |
|
are essential. Developers are encouraged to exercise caution and implement |
|
appropriate content safety safeguards based on their specific product policies |
|
and application use cases. |
|
* Misuse for malicious purposes: Technical limitations and developer and |
|
end-user education can help mitigate against malicious applications of LLMs. |
|
Educational resources and reporting mechanisms for users to flag misuse are |
|
provided. Prohibited uses of Gemma models are outlined in the |
|
[Gemma Prohibited Use Policy](https://ai.google.dev/gemma/prohibited_use_policy). |
|
* Privacy violations: Models were trained on data filtered for removal of PII |
|
(Personally Identifiable Information). Developers are encouraged to adhere to |
|
privacy regulations with privacy-preserving techniques. |
|
|
|
### Benefits |
|
|
|
At the time of release, this family of models provides high-performance open |
|
large language model implementations designed from the ground up for Responsible |
|
AI development compared to similarly sized models. |
|
|
|
Using the benchmark evaluation metrics described in this document, these models |
|
have shown to provide superior performance to other, comparably-sized open model |
|
alternatives. |
|
|