not-for-all-audiences glitch is normally fixed

#1
by FashionStash - opened

Hello @Yntec , just to prevent you that the not-for-all-audiences tag appearing in some models aswell that one, but was wrongly appearing, is now fixed normally!

Hey FashionStash! The bug I'm fighting is that if I move the not-for-all-audiences tag position so it looks like in this model: https://huggingface.co/John6666/noobai-xl-nai-xl-earlyaccessversion-sdxl then the model can't be used in a space like this: https://huggingface.co/spaces/Yntec/ToyWorldXL

The fight was for being able to test the noobai/illustrious models but after I managed to test them they disappointed me so I didn't push for featuring other models (I could get ToyWorldXL to 400 models, but there's clearly not much interest in this, while SD1.5's interest remains strong, so I let people vote with their usage of the models I upload - it couldn't get to 400 downloads, HiFi got to 1K in a day, so I'll keep focusing in the kind of models people use.)

@Yntec ahemmmm... In fact, I recall each times I tested SDXL models, it was amazingly realistic, but also poorly creative, so SDXL not my best friends when I need more creative than photo realism πŸ˜‚!

And about the Not-For-All-Audiences tag, I think it's all related to the NSFW settings in each people account, and then can only set-up in a private model or private space.

I just suppose!

Currently I'm trying funny "breakfasts" with Lah-dee-da, the result is not a good thing for yet, I must be more carefully precise in the prompt.
I only use basic settings of Inference-api serverless, it's more what I can call by letting a model being creative by itself πŸ˜‚!

By the way I need retrieve some of my older prompts I tested in Gacha but to get them working on.... LadyNostalgia!

I'm afraid the Not-For-All-Audiences models may be good at that but not at the things I usually prompt! I wouldn't know because I normally don't test for those...

Currently I'm trying funny "breakfasts" with Lah-dee-da, the result is not a good thing for yet, I must be more carefully precise in the prompt.

Cool! If you could tell me your prompt and an example image (maybe from google images?) of what you wanted it to look like, perhaps I could make a model good at that! Or perhaps not! I never tried it but it's an interesting concept to experiment with.

By the way I need retrieve some of my older prompts I tested in Gacha but to get them working on.... LadyNostalgia!

I'm looking forward to your results and being thankful for your feedback!

NFAA tag is a good thing.
It's reducing the pain to moderate models. But false detection is such of an hard pain when it hits Illustrious models.
Censorship is never a good thing, it's always limiting creativity behind wrong filters detection (how many times online ChatGPT flagged my discussions as inappropriate when I added the trigger term without any idea where it flagged my discussion as inappropriate, even for StableDiffusionWeb.com).

Censorship is always bad.
But it is always the last response to regulate strongly the things that must be regulated.

The issue here with backend censorship NFAA tag, it's that it make a model totally unable to run on HuggingFace Inference-api (paid or free or from an endpoints). So too much sadistic to see a model locked behind a wrong tag!

.......

For other things :

Hey sure! Will give that next week on your La-dee-dah model's page my "breakfast" concept art prompts and images ! 😁

With your models which I love so much more than the original ones (I find them so much creative, LadyNostalgia (Gacha, your PhotoReal2. 0 upgrade) are full lovely proves of what I said!)).. I essentially prompt arts and concepts arts.
Which serves (for the best images for illustrating covers/graphics for my Wattpad stories. And also for getting a huge amount of Trading Card Games illustrations for physical tabletop games I create sometimes, just for myself and my family and my friends in real life.

I can give you also those one!

You're definitively right about censorship, but I'm glad there's a workaround, if you want to use any of the Illustrious models tell me so I add them to https://huggingface.co/spaces/Yntec/ToyWorldXL where they can be used fine, most of the models I want to use have their Inference API off anyway due to low activity so I have to rely on my spaces to use them, and then we have Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium which is active all the time, but hasn't worked for the last two days so I've been unable to use it there! (I was about to add it to ToyWorld, what a bad timing, but at least it's not my model...)

Which serves (for the best images for illustrating covers/graphics for my Wattpad stories. And also for getting a huge amount of Trading Card Games illustrations

I'm glad to hear that! Art is a difficult subject, my most successful models have been either for Anime or photorealism, but IsThisArt was the only one that hit thanks to the beautiful faces it draws for girls.

I have made Stable Diffusion 1.5 my comfort zone and almost never venture outside of it, recently I did it for the first time with AnotherFineMess, just to have a model with a different style and compositions from all others, but it suffers heavily on the coherency and anatomy department, I don't think you'd want to use it for trading card game graphics unless you'd want to create monsters with 3 arms or 6 fingers... but it got 20000 downloads! I never expected that, I've uploaded much better models that never got to 1/10th of that, but it seems model uniqueness pays and a different architecture is the cheapest way to get it.

I can give you also those one!

Yes! That sounds great! I'll be merging La-dee-dah with more models once I know what should I be aiming for to deliver, I'm looking forward to it and it's always a pleasure talking with you!

Sign up or log in to comment