|
--- |
|
license: creativeml-openrail-m |
|
--- |
|
|
|
This is the beta version of the yama-no-susume character model (ヤマノススメ, aka encouragement of climb in English). |
|
Unlike most of the models out there, this model is capable of generating **multi-character scenes** beyond images of a single character. |
|
Of course, the result is still hit-or-miss, but it is possible to get **as many as 5 characters** right in one shot, and otherwise, you can always rely on inpainting. |
|
Here are two examples: |
|
|
|
With inpainting |
|
 |
|
|
|
Without inpainting |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
### Characters |
|
|
|
The model knows 18 characters from yama no susume and for Aoi and Hinata it knows two hair styles for each of them. |
|
The ressemblance with a character can be improved by a better description of their appearance. |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
### Dataset description |
|
|
|
The dataset contains around 40K images with the following composition |
|
- 11423 anime screenshots from the four seasons of the anime |
|
- 726 fan arts |
|
- ~30K customized regularization images |
|
|
|
The model is trained with a specific weighting scheme to balance between different concepts. |
|
For example, the above three categories have weights respectively 0.3, 0.2, and 0.5. |
|
Each category is itself split into many sub-categories in a hierarchical way. |
|
For more detail on the data preparation process please refer to https://github.com/cyber-meow/anime_screenshot_pipeline |
|
|
|
|
|
### Training Details |
|
|
|
#### Trainer |
|
The model was trained using [EveryDream1](https://github.com/victorchall/EveryDream-trainer) as |
|
EveryDream seems to be the only trainer out there that supports sample weighting (through the use of `multiply.txt`). |
|
Note that for future training it makes sense to migrate to [EveryDream2](https://github.com/victorchall/EveryDream2trainer). |
|
|
|
#### Hardware and cost |
|
The model was trained on runpod with an A6000 and cost me around 80 dollors. |
|
However, I estimate a model of similar quality can be trained with fewer than 20 dollars on runpod. |
|
|
|
#### Hyperparameter specification |
|
|
|
- The model was first trained for 18000 steps, at batch size 8, lr 1e-6, resolution 640, and conditional dropping rate of 15%. |
|
- After this, I modified a little the captions and trained the model for another 22000 steps, at batch size 8, lr 1e-6, reslution 704, and conditional dropping rate of 15%. |
|
|
|
Note that as a consequence of the weighting scheme which translates into a number of different multiply for each image, |
|
the count of repeat and epoch has a quite different meaning here. |
|
For example, depending on the weighting, I have 400K~600K images (some images are used multiple times) in an epoch, |
|
and therefore I did not even finish an entire epoch with the 40000 steps at batch size 8. |
|
|
|
### Failures |
|
|
|
I tried several things in this model (this is why I trained for so long), but I failed most of them. |
|
|
|
- I put the number of people at the beginning of the captions, but at the end of 40000 steps the model still cannot count |
|
(it can generate like 3~5 people when we prompt 3people). |
|
- I use some tokens to describe the face position within a 5x5 grid but the model did not learn anything about these tokens. |
|
I think this is either due to 1) face position being too abstract to learn, 2) data imbalance as I did not balance my training for this, or 3) captions not enough focused on these concepts (it is much longer and contains other information). |
|
- As mentioned, the model can generate multi-character scenes but the success rate becomes lower and lower as we increase the number of characters in the scene. |
|
Character bleeding is always a hard problem to solve. |
|
- The model is trained with 5% weight for hand images, but I doubt it helps in any kind. |
|
|
|
Actually, I have a doubt whether the last 22000 steps really improved the model. |
|
This is how I get my 20$ estimate taking into account that we can simply train at resolution 512 on 3090 (and also ED2 will be more efficient). |
|
|
|
|
|
### More Example Generations |
|
|
|
With inpainting |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Without inpainting |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Some failure cases |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
