user18688: In P2SH transactions, the address is the hash of the redeemScript. What is it for P2PKH transactions?

user12983: There are no "addresses" in protocol. There are only "output scripts". The address is only human-readable representation of script which matches the "output script".
The output script for bare multisig transaction is [m] + [hash1] + [hash2] + ... + [hashN] + [n] 
And all of these parts are significant. There is no "classic" representation of such address yet.
bc.i uses the form of (Escrow X of X1 X2 X3) (where Xn is standard p2pkh address) but you may use your own.

18688: <p>In P2SH transactions, the address is the hash of the redeemScript. What is it for P2PKH transactions?</p>
 12983: <p>There are no "addresses" in protocol. There are only "output scripts". The address is only human-readable representation of script which matches the "output script".</p>

<p>The output script for bare multisig transaction is [m] + [hash1] + [hash2] + ... + [hashN] + [n] </p>

<p>And all of these parts are significant. There is no "classic" representation of such address yet.</p>

<p>bc.i uses the form of <strong>(Escrow X of X1 X2 X3)</strong> (where Xn is standard p2pkh address) but you may use your own.</p>
