user66421: I'm still learning how all of this stuff works. I'm running a v0.15.1 full node. While I was watching the debug output, I noticed that orphan tx were being discarded because the maximum had been reached. To see what would happen, I restarted bitcoind with maxorphantx=1024.
Is there any benefit to the bitcoin community by preserving a larger number of orphan tx or am I just wasting memory?
Note: I forgot to mention that my copy of the blockchain is up to date. The orphans I'm seeing aren't because I'm missing blocks.

user12983: 
Is there any benefit to the bitcoin community by preserving a larger
  number of orphan tx

What kind of benefit/profit/etc can gain the community by the increased mempool for orphan transactions on one node? Literally, none.

or am I just wasting memory?

This is your donation to the network.

66421: <p>I'm still learning how all of this stuff works. I'm running a v0.15.1 full node. While I was watching the debug output, I noticed that orphan tx were being discarded because the maximum had been reached. To see what would happen, I restarted bitcoind with maxorphantx=1024.</p>

<p>Is there any benefit to the bitcoin community by preserving a larger number of orphan tx or am I just wasting memory?</p>

<p>Note: I forgot to mention that my copy of the blockchain is up to date. The orphans I'm seeing aren't because I'm missing blocks.</p>
 12983: <blockquote>
  <p>Is there any benefit to the bitcoin community by preserving a larger
  number of orphan tx</p>
</blockquote>

<p>What kind of benefit/profit/etc can gain the community by the increased mempool for orphan transactions on one node? Literally, none.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>or am I just wasting memory?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This is your donation to the network.</p>
