user46240: Such as this transaction: 92088fe6b9d9c9db84d26481b80104f8ca566649a656b7aa3e67432b346cbf1c, which has over 5000 receiving addresses.
It is unlikely that someone would send money to that many business partners at once, let along each individual output is quite small. If that is done for privacy protection purpose, over 5000 receiving addresses is too excessive. 

user12983: 
It is unlikely that someone would send money to that many business
  partners at once

Why? It's a mass payment for "shareholders". In this instance, the transaction you mentioned is a known payment from a pool to their miners.

46240: <p>Such as this transaction: 92088fe6b9d9c9db84d26481b80104f8ca566649a656b7aa3e67432b346cbf1c, which has over 5000 receiving addresses.</p>

<p>It is unlikely that someone would send money to that many business partners at once, let along each individual output is quite small. If that is done for privacy protection purpose, over 5000 receiving addresses is too excessive. </p>
 12983: <blockquote>
  <p>It is unlikely that someone would send money to that many business
  partners at once</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Why? It's a mass payment for "shareholders". In this instance, the transaction you mentioned is a <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1338693.msg13656238#msg13656238" rel="nofollow noreferrer">known payment from a pool to their miners</a>.</p>
