text
stringlengths 0
4.07k
| labels
sequence | encoded_labels
sequence | lang
stringclasses 1
value | has_toxic
int64 0
1
| has_profane
int64 0
1
| has_insult
int64 0
1
| has_hate
int64 0
1
| has_threat
int64 0
1
| has_sexual
int64 0
1
| has_offensive
int64 0
1
| has_selfharm
int64 0
1
| has_harassment
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
He's at it again. He seems insistent on adding pointless rambling on how the talk page isn't a forum just so he can make a cut at me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AXM8_rifle&diff;=193022803&oldid;=192967373
He keeps reverting my removal of it. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
So I guess your explanation of WP:CSD#T1 is still Zero. Once again you have failed to explain why a page weas deleted under WP:CSD#T1 and then threatened the inquirer with a block. Poor form. Extremely poor form. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, so that the proton itself reaches fusion distance | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Beauty pageants
Just because you have no interest in beauty pageants or their contestants doesn't mean that they are not notable - and please don't go trying to delete stuff when you are ignorant about the topic you are dealing with. I happen to think there are tons of articles on here that do not meet Wikipedia's standards and that do not have individual merit... particularly those about comics etc, but I am wise enough to know that I do not truly understand their significance and so I leave it alone. A much more prudent avenue would have been to bring your issues to the appropriate WikiProject (WikiProject Beauty Pageants and to address yoru concerns there in the first instance. One example, the continual use of the term ""model"" to describe them as has been used by yourself and one other editor, is both incorrect and somewhat demeaning. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
On Mohammed Al-Bayati's qualifications
With regards to the edits over the past day, I think that while Mohammed Al-Bayati's qualifications are tangentially relevant, the purpose of the text as they are placed right now is to ""prove"" that Mohammed Al-Bayati is not qualified to review the autopsy report. This I think violates NPOV. If the qualifications are to be included they should come under the ""criticism and controversy"" section, quoted by whoever it is that accused Mohammed Al-Bayati of not being qualified to review the autopsy report is cited. If nobody made the accusations, then this is original synthesis, and should again be removed. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
No reason to split
There is absolutely no reason why Alamo Bowl broadcasters should be split from Alamo Bowl. That list is a stub that is only 4kb long. The main article is 13kb long, much of which is tables and lists, well within the limits of WP:SIZE. A single article is only 17kb long, which is permitted, so there is no reason why the article should be split. Talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please sign your comments. Thanks! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Alyssa Flash?
At the time of writing this, Sarita's TNA iMPACT debut is coming up, and she'll be wrestling one, ""Alyssa Flash"" (note I might be spelling Alyssa wrong). I see her nowhere on the list. 24.226.21.207 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Roma people in Hungary: 8-10%
the appalling social and economic situation of the Roma, who account for between 8 and 10 percent of Hungary's 10 million people that means 800,000-1,000,000. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fuck off you murdering scum!!! | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
In addition, I am asking that you please stop accusing me of things I havent done. I do not what what sock puppeting is and I think your taking this matter personally and abusing your power. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
after adding the rational i have to remove the tag? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
wow i guess your just one of those guys then god forbid. One love then. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It has been up before but here it is again, Phil Plait claimed in a radio program with Joe Rogan that ALL shuttle astronauts who has ever gone into space has been through the van allen belts, at 6 min: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvIC1QDSnIc
If thats not misleading propaganda i dunno what is... his website should be removed as a source 31.209.16.177 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Lamia Joreige
Hi Lea, first off i'd like to tell you that your contributions are invaluable, you are presenting often overlooked subjects, kudos for that. I see you have started the aforementioned article, I didn't have it on my watchlist yet so I didn't know there was a mistake. You must take notice of some rules on WP so check out WP:Notability so you know how to better protect the materials you add against meta:deletionists. Cheers. + " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I didn't receive any massage. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I TAKE OFFENSE!
I take great offense that some pompous, sanctimonious twit thinks that no one should be allowed to express appreciation for women like the Gibson Girl as the ""fine-featured"" and ""achingly beautiful"" creatures that they are.
I don't know what kind of totalitarian feminazi dystopian agenda you are trying to foist on people, but don't do it here! This encyclopedia is based on free speech and a free exchange of information, not bogus political correctness and schoolmarmish thought-policing. I'll take a Gibson Girl over you anyday!" | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Padua User Tag
Someone should design a Padua College User Tag much like the following one for the Maroons in State of Origin
14.28 2 July 2007 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ion G Nemes|talk]]) 04:08, 21 June 2011 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
you gay motherfucker i know where you live,i am going to sand your face off,then i am to going to beat you to a pulp,you chicken shagger. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
. Ok Dennis Brown thanks for telling me I was taking this a bit way too serious ill be careful for this time stupid bots. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- that way I might even know which article you are talking about! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The are problems with the sfc t record. There are no credible sci challenges to it. This new section is absurdly US-centered, it cannot possibly stand as it it. This is the *global* record we're talking about. You need some credible scientific papers, not pictures of stations. As far as I know, the sfcstations stuff has merely documented problems with some station sitings and maintenance, etc. There is not even the beginning of an attempt at quantifying what influence, plus or minus, this might have on the record. If you're interested, there are papers about the effects of switching from north-wall screens to stevenson screens; thatched huts in africa; etc etc | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Could you please comment on Talk:Thought_identification
Re: John Norseen and Lockheed Martin
I'm beside myself trying to update information that I believe to be very relevent. It looks to me like several users who ""hang out"" at ""ANI:Fringe"" are working together to remove well sourced, valid, on topic material which shows the state of military research into thought identification. Outside comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Mediation
Hello, I am Atyndall and I have volunteered to take on your mediation case, during this discussion I will remain neutral with both sides of this argument and will endeavor to solve your dispute. After having a look at the discussion above, this is what I have found:
QuizzicalBee has been adding the sentence ""According to Chesler, the the U.S. embassy repeatedly refused to help her leave the country as they no longer recognized her as a U.S. citizen."", Hurmata has been reverting this back to ""She reports that the U.S. embassy repeatedly refused to help her leave the country. Hurmata objects to QuizzicalBee's sentence as he/she thinks that the source is incorrect as the guards would have allowed Chesler into the embassy and first hand accounts from Chesler herself does not qualify as a reliable source. QB objects, saying that maybe in the 1960s US citizenship could have been revoked by the US/Afgan government at that time and perhaps in the past the guards may have denied entry and that her claim should have been presumed true until proven false. Hurmata countered that the citation threat QB was referring to is not the one that was cited. QB states that there is no evidence disproving her claims, so they are valid.
Could the involved users please place # ~~~~ below to verify that this statement is correct or suggest why it is not correct? Thankyou, | talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Well, Arthur, I have printed the paper, and the condition is in fact what Ultra.Power says it is, not your correction. It seems that the paper is not incorrect, but rather correct and pointless.
You have already identified the worst problem: The third condition requires incontinuity of f at all integer values. However, this problem disappears if we consider only the special case a=e. So let's do that.
We want a function f satisfying f(1)=e and f(n+1)=exp(f(n)), defined as widely as possible. We observe that n=0 and n=1 present no problems: f(0)=1 and f(-1)=0.
To extend f to all positive real numbers, it is clearly sufficient to define f on an interval of length 1, such as [0,1).
And we want f to be continuously differentiable. (The paper only requires f to be continuously differentiable on (0,1), or equivalently on (-1,0). This is obviously whacky, but we needn't worry about this because a=e.)
Next, for no obvious (or explained) reason we require that f ' is monotone on the interval [0,1]. From the functional equation f(x) = ln f(x+1) we get f '(x) = f '(x+1)/f(x+1). Hence f '(-1)=f '(0)/f(0)=f '(0), so f ' must be constant on [0,1]!
Not too surprisingly, the function we get in this way is patched together from smaller pieces in a relatively unnatural way: f(x) = exp[x](exp(x-[x])).
Thus what I learned from the paper is that the correct solution to the problem probably has a minimum of its derivative between -1 and 0. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The Rangers FC
This should be the name of the Newco Rangers wikipedia page now as they are called The Rangers FC everywhere, on the SFL, SFA, SPL, BBC etc websites and in League tables and on TV. They must have Registered to use ""The Rangers FC"" to differentiate between themselves and ""Rangers FC"" who still have SPL membership." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_April_27#Wikipedia_books
Following the horribly chaos of April 7, I've resubmitted things for discussion. {talk / contribs / physics / books} " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FlexPay Tax Law
Just a comment here. I'd be interested in seeing an expansion of this artcile regarding to the tax surrounding FlexPay accounts. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
No problem at all! (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
If we do win, and get these evil people out of the government (and their private forces as well), then perhaps there won't be any nuclear blasts across the US and Europe.
btw, if MONGO is really with HS, why is he on wikipedia? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I've just seen that | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Najib Effendi al-Yasin
I suggest not to use paragraph indentation in the article Najib Effendi al-Yasin which have recently created to reach a more normal looking page. Happy editting. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lol, you know what i meant. Whichever president came before Hafez (i just new he was president before assad) has considerable foreground of support, in which his supports would have freaked out because of the coup. They would have claimed instability would arise, as assad's supporters are trying to use in their defense.
What i am trying to say is that although Bashar assad had good economic and international policies for Syria, you should not fear a non-baathist potentially being elected. Syria's economic and international policies won't change (iran would still be a major factor in Syrian life considering the buisness deals stakes and cultural exchanges) , the only this that would change are social freedoms, and for the better. Also every country had a revolution and they are still alive today. The Muslim brotherhood in Syria is weak, even weaker than the islamist prescence in Libya. The rebels in Libya had 80-90% support, as we see now, and yet could hardly take control without NATO. What chance does the Syrian Muslim brotherhood have? None. If anything, nonviolent protests weaken the resolve of the Muslim brotherhood, making them less of an influence in the everyday life of Syrians. As you know I am pro Syria and Armenia, just not pro Assad. Unlike Armenia where people like Sargsyan and Kopcharyan were democratically elected, Assad was not (no one ran against him because they were not allowed). | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
CFR is a perfectly accurate source.
The ""Council On Foreign Relations"" (CFR.ORG) is a recognized, legitimate think-tank that studies international terrorisim for the United Staes Govt. to claim they are ""Not Credible"" is idiotic.
They are as legitimate as any online newspaper or other source. They have studied Northern Ireland, and compliled a list of UDA/UVF killed by the IRA/INLA, and vice versa. These facts are good and will be included in the article." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Lead
What's there now is not a summary... summaries are supposed to be substantially shorter than the text they summarize, which the case at Salvatore Giunta is not. It simply copies whole sentances from the body text. As an editor, we have to assess the article as it currently stands, and not any hypothetical future stance. If the article grows, then the lead can be adjusted accordingly. In any case, the lead section I favored does indeed summarize the most important part: the MOH.
In any case, did you read WP:LEAD? The lead of a biography is not necessarily supposed to summarize the life story of the subject, but assert thier claim to notability. The two sentances I favored more than do that without being overly repetitive. ''''''wordsdeeds " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"{{Unblock|I'll make a renewed effort not to give personal attacks. But of course I do have some questions about this unwarranted blockage, as you might well imagine: 1. Why is it that IP editors tend to get the raw ends of the deal: that you ""admins"" tend to lean towards the side of someone who's editing with an account over someone who's editing without one, especially in the area of what you label as ""personal attacks"" or ""harassment"" when given by the IP-editor but not so much when the named editor does the same thing? 2. For exampleand this is... yep, maybe you guessed it... question 2: Why is it supposedly ""okay"" (according to you) for someone with a name... like, say... escape orbit... to dish out a personal attack, but not for me to give him one back because I'm just a lowly IP-editor? Specifically, why is it supposedly ""okay"" for him to give me a personal attack by putting false stuff on my keyboard by making the ludicrous claim that my reason for wanting the old style of ""ebaY"" logo to go next to the current one, ""ebay,"" in the lead, is ""because I wanted it in there,"" even though that is a total lie; but it's supposedly ""not okay"" for me to call that kind of slander stupid? 3. Here's another one: Why is it supposedly ""okay"" for him and ""smiley girl"" there to falsely accuse my edits of being ""vandalism"" just because they differed from what these guys preferred, but then when I say their reversions are vandalism, I get in trouble for it as if it were a ""personal attack"" just because I'm an IP-only editor? 4. Ready for one more? Then why is it fine for any of you named editors to give one of us IP-editors a warning template, but when I, as an IPer do the same thing to a named editor like I did to partially smiley girl, I get dinged with ""Oh, you can't | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
do that 'cause that's a 'personal attack',"" or ""Oh, that's bad because that's 'harassment' ""? 5. Oh yeah, here's one more! Remember the rule about edit-warring (just in general, meaning that it doesn't even have to be breaking 3RR) that says that "" 'but I was right, so I was not edit-warring' is no defense""? Well then doesn't that apply to meeting some so-called ""consensus"" too (since some things aren't cases of concrete correctness but are just based more on whether they match what that so-called ""consensus"" wanted the thing to say)? Well then why is it that just because your named friend smiley there does some edit-warring against me to put the thing back to what your exclusive (partial) ""consensus"" wants it to say, AND since my editing had already been established as NOT vandalism even though it disagrees, you ignore that above-mentioned edit-warring rule and give her/him a pass anyway, but when I, an IP-only editor who's against your exclusive ""consensus,"" do the same thing, it's ""edit-warring"" even though it was the same thing as what smiley's doing (remember the ""being-right/matching-consensus-is-no-defense"" rule)? 75.162.211.81 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
If Serbia does recognise Abkhazia and South Ossetia, then I wouldn't be at all surprised if Georgia recognises Kosovo in retaliation. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
the most subtle questions they possibly could. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Trying to measure the number of cafes
This is one of those places where I am so frustrated by Wikipedia's ban on original research. The article has the absurdly low ""at least six cafes on the Ave or its alleys"". I don't know where that number comes from, nor what they consider a ""cafe"", but it seems to me that well within any reasonable definition, the scene includes:
Solstice
Cafe Zoe
The original Allegro (on an alley parallel to the Ave); arguably, its second location in the College Inn also counts
The Ugly Mug (half block off)
The Cafe at the corner of 42nd that used to be the Roma, but I can't recall its new name
Sureshot
The Continental
Caffe Apassionato
WOW Bubble Tea
Shinka Tea Company
Yunnie Bubble Tea
Pochi Tea
Gingko Tea House
Tully's
Starbucks
Wannabee (one block off)
Still Life on the Ave (at the Grand Illusion); technically, the entrance is around the corner, but it is clearly effectively on the Ave.
This doesn't even count hangouts that are mainly bars or restaurants or takeout food joints, nor does it count things like U. Bookstore and Bulldog News, both of which have busy espresso operations, nor does it count ice cream stands. And I'm sure I'm missing something, this is all just offhand. - | Talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Actually, undue weight can also results in zero weight. As it is the whole issue is insinuation and extrapolation of given events. Just because the article doesn't outright say that Edwards is the father because there was no father listed, it is quite clear that this is the intent. Now, editors familiar with me consider me to be a FNC fanboy and appolgist regarding conservatives and republicans, so my objection to this is clearly not a partisan point of view. That said this is in violation of several WP policies. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I found it under Chronological list of PC Engine games. I thought the release dates on that page were for Japan, since there is a seperate List of TurboGrafx-16 games. The change you made is ok though, since I see IGN has it listed that way. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I agree. Fundamentally, whether you take it as a pill or through a patch or a ring, the key is that it's hormonal, so that should be the main article. At that point, oral contraceptive should either redirect to hormononal contraception, unles there is sufficient material to justify its existence. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
That was so desterbing because of when i had to do a project in school i had to explain it wasnt Bill Gates from 20 years ago | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The source was a local guide book, how do we source that? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
chill out, inty's my mate | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A Tale of a Tub on the Main page
Hey, Geogre, check it out: did you know that A Tale of a Tub will be featured on the Main page on Sunday? -) (Talk)]] 23:20, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Added C-class. I would like to add B-class but questions raised in talk page. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
No problem. Thanks for letting me know. (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Batman
I am Batman. You are Spiderman. I win. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Geometry of love
Good day. Can you search some sources for article Geometry of Love ? Probably this article contain interesting fact for DYK. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exactly; I removed the section (again) before I noticed this posting. chen7754 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please unblock and delete page
I request that you unblock my ""talk page"" and immediately and permanently delete the contents of it. You are free to permanently block me from contributing to Wikipedia, as I have no intention of doing so in any case. If you would like a reason to block me, or prove that I have violated the rules, you need not preserve the talk page. Here is another deliberate & intentionally provocative violation of the rules an old-school personal insult:
You are a loathsome, sanctimonious, hypocritical, ignorant twit. If you were in state of uncontrolled combustion, I would not take the trouble to extinguish the flames by urinating on them.
I hope that is satisfactory. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
That is true with the first edit, however the second one was an honest mistake. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
That's been the problem facing this article as well. I'd love to see this get to featured article status, but I keep running into the fact that there isn't really a whole lot of good verifiable info out there that is easily available, nor is it easy to come by a picture that is usable (though I suspect the one or two known images of him would fall under fair use). There are a couple of websites out there that basically regurgitate sections from McGregor's book. There is a certain irony in the fact that a guy who labored in anonymous solitude most of his life on a project he loved dearly died destitute and is not making several other people rather wealthy... | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You are a funney man. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Furthermore, any threats made to block individuals adding and or editing well researched information, would directly negate the sole intention of Wikipedia itself. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wikipedia is full of fools. Who takes money and makes people work for free? Wikipedia!!! You might as well ban me, you fool. What's taking so long? Wiki is a stupid place, it's Jimbo's Cult. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
They seem to be reliable enough for this topic anyways - it's not like many major news sources are going to be covering the things that these sites cover. 63.164.47.227 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
In response to your feedback
Yoa can not do it by yourself, see Wikipedia:Changing username.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
that is your opinion. And what is your proof that I am anti-Newsom? Whether you support him or not he did have a gay porn day and violated state law by issuing ""Gay marriage"" licenses, in contradiction to state law. These are facts, not slander or fiction..." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
That admission begs the question ""Is it better to punish adolescent boys if they are going to engage in bullying behaviour here, or extend them welcome?"" /talk/ " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"== French-speakers and Paris ==
Can anybody explain this: ""French-speakers concentrate heavily on cultural life in Paris""? What does it mean? 21:09, Sep 28, 2004 (UTC)" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why are you changing the SOMALI PEOPLE WIKI????????????????????/
SERIOUSLY????????? THAT PAGE IS BIASED TO ONE CLAN, I ADDED A MORE DIVERSE REPRESENTATION OF SOMALI PEOPLE!
YOU STUPID CRIMINAL. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Davkal, I agree with you, but would suggest that you don't discuss it or gloat because you know he will likely come back and start harassing agagin.
Apparently just a few hours after he left someone bit his head off on his talk page about a comment he left in an article. - | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thanks
Thanks for the tip Buddy. walkie-talkie
KY highway page
I'm currently cleaning up the page. Please do not edit it. Thanks. Let's Go Mets - Stats
Your first barnstar!
{| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;""
|rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" |
|rowspan=""2"" |
|style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"" | The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
|-
|style=""vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;"" | I hereby award BigrTex the tireless contributor barnstar due to his outstanding amount of high quality edits. Hikaru " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Transistor
The transistor page does not have a Principle of Operation section, because
a)the physicists know about it but don't want to share it
b)they just don't know how it works
I was thinking about it and came up with a fairly decent concept of how it works, I put it on WIKI, I think the guys got jealous, and here I am, discussing pretty much nothing.
PS: and my language is pathetic, you naughty naughty boy,..I'll eat you...:))) | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I like to see it in print, since it's been listed for days now without an URL. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
Wikipedia should not be used as a place for guides or a walk through.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hmmm. There is a way to do this. I'll see if I can remember what the code is. gabsadds " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
This article already exists see Liger. Pro " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Feather
There is no citation as to how a quill looked in the past. Therefore, it is opinion only. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bakan
Why is Abbie Bakan even mentioned in this article? Based on the worthless rag of hers which is cited as a source in this article, she's nothing but a shill for Lenin and the rest of the commie gang. In that rag, she not only shows egregious pro-Communist bias, but doesn't even bother to check the facts, much less look at the causes of the Kronstadt rebellion or even cite reliable historical sources on that subject. She also discredits herself with absurd accusations of a White conspiracy to overthrow the Soviet government and even of the rebellion being motivated by anti-semitic racism among the sailors. Furthermore, all the claims made in that rag are based on a case of begging the question: that is, since Lenin's Communist regime was good (major premise) and the Kronstadt rebellion harmed said regime (minor premise), suppressing the rebellion was justified. Last but not least, the mere fact that the aforementioned rag was first published by a self-admitted socialist party by definition means that this source DOES NOT meet EITHER WP:NPOV OR WP:RS. If such sources continue to be used in Wikipedia articles, the whole project will soon turn into Commiepedia. 67.169.177.176 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Messages on talk pages during an AfD
Placing messages on Users talk pages such as and in the hope of gaining support is an unacceptable practice which, agin, hinders the AfD process. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
trivia
i'd advise you to look the word up in a good dictionary, jay. mr townsley's marriage into an important business dynasty is obviously noteworthy, which is why it's noted prominently in the article linked to. cheers. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Might I remind you that this is the ENGLISH language Wikipedia, and you have no greater precedence here than I do. Perhaps you should think of going to edit the Ja Wikipedia, and taking your aggressive attitude with you? Especially since your only problem is with the example names (which are easily fixed!) You're clearly incapable of appreciating the improvements I made in English, so perhaps you're not the best person to judge. 81.178.252.102 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of David Fork
A tag has been placed on David Fork requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. what do u want? " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your suggestion of editing the article is completely workable and was working as per Wikipedia guidelines until Jayjg and SlimVirgin started deleting large relevant chunks of the article, and reverting it to what we have now, as punitive gestures. If we can all agree to concentrate on making the article better, instead of punishing each other, there is no reason the article has to be locked.
I agree that we should start with an extremely innocuous definition preamble statement we can all agree on. However, a definition doesn't do anyone any good unless it conveys some sort of information. If there were just one word that we could all agree is associated with terrorism, that would be better than no definition at all: ""intimidate"" for instance. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Speaking without knowing what I'm talking about? OK, how 'bout this: the original comment I made about Everlast's entry constantly being vandalized by Eminem fans was written a month ago before your dumb ass got involved with the site. The feud started with the Dilated Peoples track. That's why I believed that the verse Everlast contributed should be in there (and still do). The jabs taken back and forth after that deserve a synopsis only. Your idiotic little comment about album sales was excessive and unnecessary. It belongs in there no more than the fact that everyone who knows both artists agrees that if they ever got into it, Everlast would knock the living shit outta Eminem. And THAT came off an Eminem fan site. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Our Talk Archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of Spunga
A tag has been placed on Spunga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Plus, you have to be a natural born citizen... which I'm going to assume is not. But who cares anyway. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Unblocked for the last time
Ok, now don't fuck up. I mean that in the best possible way. Good luck and good night. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I understand your position and think that your point is perfectly valid. However, I don't deem ""Iaşi-Chişinău"" a creation of Wikipedia, even with the lack of historical sources for that effect in the English language. I'll think more about this tomorrow. Thank you for explaining your position to me with such accurate detail. Best regards, nd " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
you studid cock sucker u stop callin me ok its a frank Garrett eatin the worms crawl outa your moms pussy you fucking retardo hit I retardo | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks
User talk:Biggity... are there any constructive edits? Indef block, perhaps? Mahalo. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"For anyone interested in accurate (not deliberately misleading) information about the ""ten-string guitar"" (i.e. not the garbage that will no doubt soon be presented here), see www.myspace.com/tenstringguitar []. (Tthough my temporary site has now been hidden/removed from google search listings by some shady dealings, the truth will prevail.)
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
":You said: ""I am determined that the page will not regress to this again, and I will delete anything inappropriate that jeopardizes the good progess that is now being made. A completely inappropriate post in the middle of a sensitive discussion threatens to do just that."" The problem is that you are not the sole arbiter of this (or any) talk page. The post was innocuous and did not violate the conditions of the arbitration decision. Nor did it affect the flow of discussion on the page. In fact the most appropriate response would have been to just ignore it. By removing it you just encourage a reaction. You accuse me of wikilawyering, which is absurd. The guidelines are there to help us all. However, not only do you violate that guideline, but also several policies. It is this kind of heavy handed action that encourages people to persist with problem edits. It is a long-standing convention that we do not remove other users posts and in my three years here I have never seen it done when it wasn't vandalism. Unless you can give me a much better reason for not doing so, I am going to reinstate the deleted text.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The Glourious People's Republic of China has carried out a survey of the Great Wall. It is no surprise that Chinese inventions such as the Wall exist to this day. One day our Great Wall will stretch all the way around the World. Anyway, let's add details of our dear government's survey. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FisherQueen, would you kindly stop following my every move and deleting things off MY user page. Havent you got anything better to do than piss people off on Wikipedia. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
So Jim Burton, child molesting faggot, I see you are still with us for yet another day, making a total buffoon out of yourself as usual. I don't know what is sadder here - you, or the extreme hypocritical arrogance you show by lecturing the world about ""ethical principles"" for your claimed ""rights"" to abuse our children. You have no ethical principles to save your life, but it's exactly as the Roman poet said, isn't it? ""the harlot doth always rebuke the chaste."" Will you ever drop dead, we might all breathe a little easier for our kids sake. You truly disgust me with every word you write. " | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Having read Will Beback, I already changed the structure: separate ""someone's"" view over him into separate section. I suggest: Further restructuring welcome, and Details per section later- " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nevermind. The has assimilated those puppies. ) Sorry for the bother. Cheese/Wine | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I fixed the link. It took all of about 3 seconds. Now leave it or I will report you to the administrators. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
As I have told they were not deliberate personal attacks. In my belief, my messages have been interpreted wrongly although I asumed good faith in posting them. As I have mentioned that | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Vole. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. royal court " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deleted American Criminal category
It's incredible to me that the facts of this article might lead some misguided soul to think this is what the American Criminal Category is for. There's a lively discussion at the category's talk page about what should be in the category, but even the most expansive reading of the category doesn't countenance this. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MILLINOS OF HUNJAN looking at hunjan template not just me other hunjan will fight back, your concept of art bull of shit!! 86.166.250.11 tharkarn and what waste man! | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Just to add Kansas Bear.When I said:
""You made the elementry mistake of calling it a treaty when it was in fact a congrass""
Is because as you left out as usual my post in which you regarded the three deligations as having been pressent at the treaty o Arass with Papal meditiation.The treaty of Arass was a private treaty only between the deligations of Burgundy and France and made a military alliance in 1439.Again we are debatting on the Burgundian recognition stop changing the subject.You clearly are giving fallactious statements and I feel your posts are utterly questionable.If you happend to remeber a month ago we both agreed the congrass and treaty of Arass were different.I corrected your statement when you regarded the three deligations as bieng pressent at the treaty of Arass.P.S Stop with your childish personal attacks.I aqsked you to give sources regarding that Burgundy didnt recognize Henry as King of France but you give refs regarding the treaty of Arass and mixing up the posts.If you cant handle the fact that Burgundy recognised Henry as King of France then I have already reverted you on the dual-monarchy article.You should be ashamed of your Fallactious remarks nd utterly questionable unsourced facts
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |