Datasets:

Marina-C

/

question-answer-Subject-Finance-Instruct

like 1

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "where can i find historical united states treasury note volume?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the securities industry and financial markets association (sifma) publishes these and other relevant data on their statistics page, in the \"treasury & agency\" section. the volume spreadsheet contains annual and monthly data with bins for varying maturities. these data only go back as far as january 2001 (in most cases). sifma also publishes treasury issuances with monthly data for bills, notes, bonds, etc. going back as far as january 1980. most of this information comes from the daily treasury statements, so that's another source of specific information that you could aggregate yourself. somewhere i have a parser for the historical data (since the treasury doesn't provide it directly; it's only available as daily text files). i'll post it if i can find it. it's buried somewhere at home, i think.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "as an american working in the uk, do i have to pay taxes on foreign income?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a) a tax treaty probably covers this for the avoidance of double taxation. tax treaties can be very cryptic and have little precedence clarifying them http://www.irs.gov/businesses/international/article/0,,id=169552,00.html b) i'm going to say no since the source of your income is going to be us based. but the uk tax laws might also have specific verbage for resident source income. sorry it is an inconclusive answer, but should be some factors to consider and point you in the right direction.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "trouble sticking to a budget when using credit cards for day to day transactions?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in your comment in response to this answer, you said that your biggest issue is oversight, which you can do by checking your online bank account regularly. mint.com looks good but you're in australia? easy, check out getpocketbook.com. using it and love it, helps a lot to track your tracking, and it's a god-send during tax time.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what's the difference between term and whole life insurance?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "for most people term is the way to go. i consider life insurance a necessity not an investment. see this article on smartmoney.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what is the difference between finra share volume and nasdaq share volume?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "assuming the data you're referring to is this line: the difference might be related to the different exchanges on which the stock trades. finra could be listing the reported volume from one exchange, while the nasdaq data might be listing the volume on all exchanges. this is an important distinction because aav is a canadian company that is listed on the toronto stock exchange and the nyse. the q at the end of the line stands for nasdaq, according to finra's codebook for those data. my guess is that the finra data is only reporting the volume for the nasdaq exchange and not the total volume for all exchanges (toronto, nasdaq, nyse, etc.) while the data straight from nasdaq, oddly enough, is reporting the total volume. however, finra could also face reporting discrepancies, since it's a regulatory body and therefore might not have the most up-to-date volume data that the various exchanges can access. i don't know if it's related or not, but looking at the nasdaq historical data, it looks like the volume on march 6, the day you're asking about, was much lower than the volume in most of the days immediately before or after it. for all i know, something might have happened that day concerning that particular stock or the market as a whole. i don't remember anything in particular, but you never know.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "on what time scales are stock support and resistance levels meaningful?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "support and resistance only works as a self-fulfilling prophecy. if everyone trading that stock agrees there's a resistance at so-and-so level, and it is on such-and-such scale, then they will trade accordingly and there will really be a support or resistance. so while you can identify them at any time scale (although as a rule the time scale on which you observed them should be similar to the time scale on which you intend to use them), it's no matter unless that's what all the other traders are thinking as well. especially if there are multiple possible s/p levels for different time scales, there will be no consensus, and the whole system will break down as one cohort ruins the other group's s/p by not playing along and vice versa. but often fundamentals are expected to dominate in the long run, so if you are thinking of trades longer than a year, support and resistance will likely become meaningless regardless. it's not like that many people can hold the same idea for that long anyhow.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can a entrepreneur hire a self-employed business owner?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "yes. i can by all means start my own company and name myself ceo. if bill gates wanted to hire me, i'll take the offer and still be ceo of my own company. now, whether or not my company makes money and survives is another question. this is the basis of self-employed individuals who contract out their services.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what is the effect of options expiration on equity pricing?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "institutions and market makers tend to try and stay delta neutral, meaning that for every options contract they buy or write, they buy or sell the equivalent underlying asset. this, as a theory, is called max pain, which is more of an observation of this behavior by retail investors. this as a reality is called delta hedging done by market makers and institutional investors. the phenomenom is that many times a stock gets pinned to a very even number at a particular price on options expiration days (like 500.01 or 499.99 by closing bell). at options expiration dates, many options contracts are being closed (instutitions and market makers are typically on the other side of those trades, to keep liquidity), so for every one standard 100 share contract the market maker wrote, they bought 100 shares of the underlying asset, to remain delta neutral. when the contract closes (or get rid of the option) they sell that 100 shares of the underlying asset. at mass volume of options traded, this would cause noticeable downward pressure, similarly for other trades it would cause upward pressure as institutions close their short positions against options they had bought. the result is a pinned stock right above or below an expiration that previously had a lot of open interest. this tends to happen in more liquid stocks, than less liquid ones, to answer that question. as they have more options series and more strike prices. no, this would not be illegal, in the us attempting to \"mark the close\" is supposedly prohibited but this wouldn't count as it, the effect of derivatives on stock prices is far beyond the sec's current enforcement regime :) although an active area of research", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is this employee stock purchase plan worth it when adding my student loan into the equation?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the closer the contribution is to the december 31st date, the more profitable that specific contribution is, only taking into consideration the 5% discount. on your case, the first contribution that beats your student loans interest rate is the august one, where you get about 9% annual return, the remaining contributions go up from there.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what effect would currency devaluation have on my investments?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "first, a clarification. no assets are immune to inflation, apart from inflation-indexed securities like tips or inflation-indexed gilts (well, if held to maturity, these are at least close). inflation causes a decline in the future purchasing power of a given dollar1 amount, and it certainly doesn't just affect government bonds, either. regardless of whether you hold equity, bonds, derivatives, etc., the real value of those assets is declining because of inflation, all else being equal. for example, if i invest $100 in an asset that pays a 10% rate of return over the next year, and i sell my entire position at the end of the year, i have $110 in nominal terms. inflation affects the real value of this asset regardless of its asset class because those $110 aren't worth as much in a year as they are today, assuming inflation is positive. an easy way to incorporate inflation into your calculations of rate of return is to simply subtract the rate of inflation from your rate of return. using the previous example with inflation of 3%, you could estimate that although the nominal value of your investment at the end of one year is $110, the real value is $100*(1 + 10% - 3%) = $107. in other words, you only gained $7 of purchasing power, even though you gained $10 in nominal terms. this back-of-the-envelope calculation works for securities that don't pay fixed returns as well. consider an example retirement portfolio. say i make a one-time investment of $50,000 today in a portfolio that pays, on average, 8% annually. i plan to retire in 30 years, without making any further contributions (yes, this is an over-simplified example). i calculate that my portfolio will have a value of 50000 * (1 + 0.08)^30, or $503,132. that looks like a nice amount, but how much is it really worth? i don't care how many dollars i have; i care about what i can buy with those dollars. if i use the same rough estimate of the effect of inflation and use a 8% - 3% = 5% rate of return instead, i get an estimate of what i'll have at retirement, in today's dollars. that allows me to make an easy comparison to my current standard of living, and see if my portfolio is up to scratch. repeating the calculation with 5% instead of 8% yields 50000 * (1 + 0.05)^30, or $21,6097. as you can see, the amount is significantly different. if i'm accustomed to living off $50,000 a year now, my calculation that doesn't take inflation into account tells me that i'll have over 10 years of living expenses at retirement. the new calculation tells me i'll only have a little over 4 years. now that i've clarified the basics of inflation, i'll respond to the rest of the answer. i want to know if i need to be making sure my investments span multiple currencies to protect against a single country's currency failing. as others have pointed out, currency doesn't inflate; prices denominated in that currency inflate. also, a currency failing is significantly different from a prices denominated in a currency inflating. if you're worried about prices inflating and decreasing the purchasing power of your dollars (which usually occurs in modern economies) then it's a good idea to look for investments and asset allocations that, over time, have outpaced the rate of inflation and that even with the effects of inflation, still give you a high enough rate of return to meet your investment goals in real, inflation-adjusted terms. if you have legitimate reason to worry about your currency failing, perhaps because your country doesn't maintain stable monetary or fiscal policies, there are a few things you can do. first, define what you mean by \"failing.\" do you mean ceasing to exist, or simply falling in unit purchasing power because of inflation? if it's the latter, see the previous paragraph. if the former, investing in other currencies abroad may be a good idea. questions about currencies actually failing are quite general, however, and (in my opinion) require significant economic analysis before deciding on a course of action/hedging. i would ask the same question about my home's value against an inflated currency as well. would it keep the same real value. your home may or may not keep the same real value over time. in some time periods, average home prices have risen at rates significantly higher than the rate of inflation, in which case on paper, their real value has increased. however, if you need to make substantial investments in your home to keep its price rising at the same rate as inflation, you may actually be losing money because your total investment is higher than what you paid for the house initially. of course, if you own your home and don't have plans to move, you may not be concerned if its value isn't keeping up with inflation at all times. you're deriving additional satisfaction/utility from it, mainly because it's a place for you to live, and you spend money maintaining it in order to maintain your physical standard of living, not just its price at some future sale date. 1) i use dollars as an example. this applies to all currencies.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how to split stock earnings?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if he asked you to invest his money with certain objectives which resulted in you buying specific stocks for him with his money, then sell all the stocks which you bought with his money and the capital and profits to him. you may want to calculate the trading fees that you incurred while buying these specific stocks and taxes from the sale of these stocks, withholding them to over the trading fees that you have already paid and the taxes that you might still need to pay. if you traded with his money no different than yours, then i would think of your investment account as a black box. calculate the initial money that you both invested at the time you added his capital to the account, calculate how much it all is currently worth, then liquidate and return a percentage equal to that of his initial investment. you can account for trading fees and taxes, subtracting by the same percentage.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can i save on closing costs when buying a home?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "as a buyer, one of the easiest ways to save on closing costs is to avoid title insurance. this will only apply if you are a cash buyer, as a mortgage writer will typically require title insurance. it is also one of the most ill-advised ways to save money. you need title insurance. for the most part, there is really no way to truly save on closing costs. wrapping costs into a loan, saving on interest or taxes through timing don't truly save money. sometimes you can obtain discounts on closing by using an targeted lender, but that may cost you in higher interest rates. by paying points on your loan, you may increase your costs at closing in order to save money on interest paid. certainly you can't discount required, government imposed fees (like doc stamps). you may be able to shop around and find a bit lower fees for appraisal, credit reports, title company fees, and title insurance. however, that is a lot of work for not a lot of return. title companies seem to be pretty tight lipped about their fees. the best yield of your time is to get the other party in the transaction to pay your costs. the market or local tradition may not allow this. an additional way to lower your costs is to ask the realtors involved to discount their commissions. however, they could always say \"no\". the bottom line is transacting real estate is very expensive.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why won't my retirement account let me write a covered put?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you're correct in your implied point: selling a cash secured put has less risk (in terms of both volatility and maximum loss) than buying the security outright. however, many brokerages don't allow cash-secured put writing in ira accounts. there are three reasons this tends to be the case:", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "paying taxes on dividends even though your capital gains were $0?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the issue for you seems to be the sequence of events. presumably, there will be a gain in the fund. in one year, you have a fund worth $100,000 and the $8500 your netted from the $10,000 dividend. (dividends are taxed at 15% for most of us. if your taxable income is under $38k single, it's $0) an $8500 net return for the year. now, if there were no initial dividend, and at the end of a full year, your $100k grew to $110k, and then gave you the $10k dividend, you might not be so unhappy. even on day 2, you now have a fund worth $90k with a basis of $100k, and the promise of future dividends or cap gains. when you sell, the first $10k of gain from this point will effectively be tax free due to this quick drop. to directly answer the last few sentences, dividends and cap gains are different. and different still, for the way a fund processes them.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "paying for things on credit and immediately paying them off: any help for credit rating?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the biggest risk is credit utilization rate. if you have a total of $10,000 in revolving credit (ie: credit card line) and you ever have more than 50% (or 33% to be conservative) on the card at any time then your credit score will be negatively impacted. this will be a negative impact even if you charge it on day one and pay it off in full on day 2. doesn't make much sense but credit companies are playing the averages: on average they find that people who get close to maxing their credit limit are in some sort of financial trouble. you're better off to make small purchases each month, under $100, and pay them off right away. that will build a better credit history - and score.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "covered call when stock position is at a loss", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i don't think you understand options. if it expires, you can't write a new call for the same expiration date as it expired that day. also what if the stock price decreases further to $40 or even more? if you think the stock will move in either way greatly, and you wish to be profit from it, look into straddles.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "which student loans to pay off first: stafford or private?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "without knowledge of the special provisions of your loan contract, the one with the highest interest rate should be paid first. or, if one's fixed payment is much larger than the other, and it is a burden, then it should be paid first, but refinancing may be an option. socially speaking and possibly even economically since it could affect your reputation, it is probably best to either refinance the cosigned loan or pay that off as rapidly as possible. economically speaking, i would recommend no prepayment since the asset that is leveraged is your mind which will last many decades, probably exceeding the term of the loan, but some caveats must be handled first: many would disagree, but i finance the way i play poker: tight-aggressive.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "does the stock market create any sort of value?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you are right, it is a ponzi scheme unless it pays all of the profits as dividends. here's why: today's millenials are saving a lot less, and instead they choose to be spenders. it's just that their mentality is different. if the trend continues there will be more spenders and less savers. that means that in 20 years from now, a company might sell more and make more profits, but because there are less investors on the market it will worth less (judging by supply and demand this has to be true). doesn't that seem like a disconnect to you guys? doesn't that just prove that all those profits are not really yours, but instead you're just sitting on the side making bets about them? if i own a company from the point where it goes public and while the value goes up i hold on to it for 50 years. let's say for 45 years it made tons of profits but never paid a cent in dividend, and then in 5 years it goes out of business. what happened to all the profits they made throughout the 45 years? if you owned a restaurant that made a profit for 45 years and then went bankrupt you are fine, you took your profits every year because why on earth would you reinvest 100% of the profit forever? but what if you could sell 49.9% of that restaurant on the stock market, get all of that ipo money and still keep all of the profits while claiming that you reinvest it forever? that's exactly what they do! they just buy expensive things for personal use, from fancy cars to private jets, they just write it down as an investment and you can't see what the money was spent on because you are not a majority stakeholder, you have no power. it was not like this forever, companies used to pay all of their profits in dividends and be valued according to that. not anymore. now they are just in it for the growth, it will keep growing as long as people keep buying into it, and that's the exact definition of a ponzi scheme.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why does the fed use pce over cpi?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the reason is in your own question. the answer is simple. they use that code to tax the product otherwise it would just be out of pocket expenses.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why would i vote for an increase in the number of authorized shares?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i'll skip the \"authorizing....\" and go right to uses of new shares: companies need stock as another liquid asset for a variety of purposes, and if not enough stock is available, then may be forced to the open market to acquire, either by exchanging cash or taking on debt to get the cash.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what's a normal personal debt / equity ratio for a highly educated person?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "what is your biggest wealth building tool? income. if you \"nerf\" your income with payments to banks, cable, credit card debt, car payments, and lattes then you are naturally handicapping your wealth building. it is sort of like trying to drive home a nail holding a hammer right underneath the head. normal is broke, don't be normal. normal obtains student loans while getting an education. you don't have to. you can work part time, or even full time and get a degree. as an example, here is one way to do it in florida. get a job working fast food and get your associates degree using a community college that are cheap. then apply for the state troopers. go away for about 5 months, earning an income the whole time. you automatically graduate with a job that pays for state schools. take the next three years (or more if you want an advanced degree) to get your bachelors. then start your desirable career. what is better to have \"wasted\" approx 1.5 years being a state trooper, or to have a student loan payment for 20 years? there is not even pressure to obtain employment right after graduation. btw, i know someone who is doing exactly what i outlined. every commercial you watch is geared toward getting you to sign on the line that is dotted, often going into debt to do so. car commercials will tell you that you are a bad mom or not a real man if you don't drive the 2015 whatever. think differently, throw out your numbers and shoot for zero debt. edit: op, i have a ms in comp sci, and started one in finance. my wife also has a masters. we had debt. we paid that crap off. work like a fiend and do the same. my wife's was significant. she planned on having her employer pay it off for each year she worked there. (like 20% each year or something.) guess what, that did not work out! she went to work somewhere else! live like you are still in college and use all that extra money to get rid of your debt. student loans are consumer debt.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "any reason to keep iras separate?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i don't know about keeping different rollover iras separate. but i know that there is a reason to keep rollover iras separate from other traditional iras -- if you want to roll them back into a 401(k) in the future, some 401(k)s only allow funds that were rolled over from a 401(k) originally.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "official site to follow warren buffet's berkshire hathaway change in investment holdings?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the official source is the most recent form 13f that berkshire hathaway, which is filed with the securities & exchange commission on a quarterly basis . you can find it through the sec filing search engine, using brka as the ticker symbol. and then looking for the filings marked 13-fr or 13-fr/a (the \"/a\" indicates an amended filing). as you can see by looking at the 13-f filed for the quarter ending september 30 , the document isn't pretty or necessarily easy to read, hence the popularity of sites such as those that chad linked to. it is, though, the truly official source from which websites tracking the berkshire hathaway portfolio derive their information.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "dealing with form 1099", "role": "user" }, { "content": "am i required to send form 1099 to non-us citizens who are not even residing in the us? since they're not required to file us taxes, do i still have to send the form to them? that's tricky. you need to get w8/w9 from them, and act accordingly. you may need to withhold 30% (or different percentage, depending on tax treaty they claim on w8). if you withhold taxes, you also need to file form 1042. i suggest you talk to a tax professional. is it fine to expose my itin (taxpayer identification number) to individuals or companies who i send the form to them. since the form requires me to write my tin/ein, what would be the risks of this and what precautions should be taken to avoid inappropriate/illegal use? no, it is not ok. but if you pay these people directly - you don't have much choice, so deal with it. get a good insurance for identity theft, and don't transact with people you don't trust. one alternative would be to pay through a payment processor (paypal or credit cards) - see your next question. i send payments via paypal and wire transfer. should i send form 1099-misc or 1099-k? paypal is a corporation, so you don't need to send 1099 to paypal. whatever paypal sends to others - it will issue the appropriate forms. similarly if you use a credit card for payment. when you send money through paypal - you don't send money directly to your business counterparts. you send money to paypal.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how to fix finance::quote to pull quotes in gnucash", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the yahoo finance api is no longer available, so finance::quote needs to point at something else. recent versions of finance::quote can use alphavantage as a replacement for the yahoo finance api, but individual users need to acquire and input an alphavantage api key. pretty decent documentation for how to this is available at the gnucash wiki. once you've followed the directions on the wiki and set the api key, you still need to tell each individual security to use alphavantage rather than yahoo finance: as a warning, i've been having intermittent trouble with alphavantage. from the gnucash wiki: be patient. alphavantage does not have the resources that yahoo! did and it is common for quote requests to time out, which gnucash will present as \"unknown error\". i've certainly been experiencing those errors, though not always.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is it ever a good idea to close credit cards?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the only good reason i find to close cards are: it's a card with an annual fee that you don't need. no point bleeding money each year. churning rewards. open card to get bonus promotion such as \"spend $500 in first 3 months, get $200 bonus\". close card and open a year later to do that same bonus again if available. many cards don't allow you to do this. making room for newer cards at the same bank. example, you have 5 chase cards and you want to apply for a 6th. chase says you have maximized your credit they will extend you. you close one of your existing cards to get that new card. i have seen that many banks allow you to shift over some over your existing available credit to your new card without having to close them.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what is the best way to make a bet that a certain stock will go up in the medium term?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "specific stock advice isn't permitted on these boards. i'm discussing the process of a call spread with the apple jan 13 calls as an example. in effect, you have $10 to 'bet.' each bet you'd construct offers a different return (odds). for example, if you bought the $750 call at $37.25, you'd need to look to find what strike has a bid of $27 or higher. the $790 is bid $27.75. so this particular spread is a 4 to 1 bet the stock will close in january over $790, with a $760 break even. you can pull the number from yahoo to a spreadsheet to make your own chart of spread costs, but i'll give one more example. you think it will go over $850, and that strike is now ask $18.85. the highest strike currently listed is $930, and it's bid $10.35. so this spread cost is $850, and a close over $930 returns $8000 or over 9 to 1. again, this is not advice, just an analysis of how spreads work. note, any anomalies in the pricing above is the effect of a particular strike having no trades today, not every strike is active so 'last trade' can be days old. note: my answer adds to alexr's response in that once you used the word bet and showed a desire to make a risky move, options are the answer. you acknowledged you understand the basic concept, but given the contract size of 100 shares, these suggestions are ways to bet under your $1000 limit and profit from the gain in the underlying stock you hope to see.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how hard for us customers make payments to non-resident freelancer by wire transfer?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "can you tell me please, is it really hard to make international wire transfer for payment my job and can i resolve this problem without using third party services? this is mostly a barrier, the form at times is quite complicated. for russia, one has to enter \"purpose of remittance\" ... at times select intermediate banks, give bic and other details. this can become unnerving to people who are not used to it. the other option you can try is set-up a credit card gateway and get funds via cards.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why is it that stock prices for a company seem to go up after a layoff?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if the market believes that the company is overstaffed, then management acknowledging the issue and resolving the problem can result in the price going up. it can also mean that external events drove the price up, and the bad news was lost in the other issues of the day. sometimes layoffs are a sign of the company entering a long downward spiral; in other cases it is a sign of the beginning recovery. the layoffs can also be viewed as good news if they weren't as big as some experts feared. you have to look at the exact situation to understand why news x impacts the companies price.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can people have such high credit card debts?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you must understand that not everyone has or can get credit cards. consider that those who are in the the lowest 20-30% of income tend to have fewer credit cards (or none), and lower credit debt, although some have quite high credit card debt relative to their income. so you really aren't comparing the same demographics (the population of all income earners, used to calculate average income, and the population of all credit card debt holders, are not the same groups of people). once you remove those folks from consideration, then credit card usage may still average higher, but accept that it is unusual for people making less than $20k-30k/year to have much credit card debt. you must understand that wealth and income are two very different (although related) concepts. one must note that there are millions of people in the u.s. who have wealth; they have net assets of over $1m (excluding their homes). many of those folks have assets greatly exceeding $1m. and although it might seem foolish to carry a large balance on their credit cards, they may have quite low interest rates, and simply find it simpler and more convenient to use credit cards in lieu of personal loans. suppose you have $2m in net assets, and want to buy a classic car or a diamond necklace. charging $30k and carrying the balance until a dividend check arrives may make sense. understand also that not everyone makes the same choices, or good choices. carrying a credit card balance may appear like a poor choice, especially when you are not wealthy, or have lower income. but suppose you have a high credit limit across several cards, and you need to handle a short-term financial challenge (car repair, layoff, medical bills, etc). you might use the credit card to pay for that purchase, essentially financing an extraordinary event over a longer period of time. and although having a balance of more than 5-10% of your monthly income may seem foolish to some, it may make sense to others. and some people choose to carry balances of 50% to 100% of their credit limit. others realize that keeping their credit utilization below 30%, 20%, or 10% of the credit limit is a better plan (both interest rate and risk wise).", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how companies choose earnings release dates, & effect on implied volatility", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i can't speak authoritatively to your broader question about stocks in general, but in several years tracking aapl closely, i can tell you that there's little apparent pattern to when their earnings call will be, or when it will be announced. what little i do know: - aapl's calls tend to occur on a tuesday more than any other day of the week - it's announced roughly a month in advance, but has been announced w/ less notice - it has a definite range of dates in which it occurs, typically somewhere in the 3rd week of the new quarter plus or minus a few days more broadly for #1: given the underlying nature of what an option is, then yes, the day an earnings call date is announced could certainly influence the iv/price of options - but only for options that expire inside the \"grey area\" (~2 weeks long) window in which the call could potentially occur. options expiring outside that grey area should experience little to no price change in reaction to the announcement of the date - unless the date was itself surprising, e.g. an earlier date would increase the premium on earlier dated options, a later date would increase the premium for later-dated options. as for #2: the exact date will probably always be a mystery, but the main factors are: - the historical pattern of earnings call dates (and announcements of those dates) which you can look up for any given company - when the company's quarter ends - potentially some influence in how long it takes the company to close out their books for the quarter (some types of businesses would be faster than others) - any special considerations for this particular quarter that affect reporting ability and finally: - a surprise of an earnings call occurring (substantively) later than usual is rarely going to be a good sign for the underlying security, and the expectation of catastrophe - while cratering the underlying - may also cause a disproportionate rise in ivs/prices due to fear", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "would i need to keep track of 1099s?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you have to file and issue each one of them a 1099 if you are paying them $600 or more for the year. because you need to issue a 1099 to them (so they can file their own taxes), i don't think there's a way that you could just combine all of them. additionally, you may want to make sure that you are properly classifying these people as contractors in case they should be employees.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "using credit card points to pay for tax deductible business expenses", "role": "user" }, { "content": "for simplicity, let's start by just considering cash back. in general, cash back from credit cards for personal use is not taxable, but for business use it is taxable (sort of, i'll explain later). the reason is most personal purchases are made with after tax dollars; you typically aren't deducting the cost of what you purchased from your personal income, so if you purchase something that costs $100 and you receive $2 back from the cc company, effectively you have paid $98 for that item but that wouldn't affect your tax bill. however, since businesses typically deduct most expenses, that same $100 deduction would have only been a $98 deduction for business tax purposes, so in this case the $2 should be accounted for. note, you should not consider that $2 as income though; that would artificially inflate your revenue. it should be treated as a negative expense, similar to how you would handle returning an item you purchased and receiving a cc refund. now for your specific questions: part 1: as a small business owner, i wish to attend an annual seminar to improve my business. i have enough credit card reward points to cover the airfare, hotel, and rental car. will those expenses still be deductible at the value displayed on the receipt? effectively no, these expenses are not deductible. if you deduct them they will be completely counter-acted by the \"refund\" you receive for the payments. part 2: does it matter if those points are accrued on my personal credit card, rather than a business credit card? this is where it gets hairy. suppose your company policy is that employees make purchases with their own personal credit cards and submit receipts for reimbursement. in this case the employer can simply reimburse and would not know or care if the employee is racking up rewards/points/cashback. the trick is, as the employee, you must always purchase business related items normally so you have receipts to show, and if you receive cashback on the side there seems to be a \"don't ask, don't tell\" rule that the irs is ok with. it works the same way with heavy business travelers and airline miles- the free vacations those users get as perks are not treated as taxable income. however, i would not go out of my way to abuse this \"loophole\". typically, things like travel (airfare, hotel, car rental, meals) are expected. but i wouldn't go purchase 100 company laptops on your personal card and ask the company to reimburse you. the company should purchase those 100 laptops on a company card and effectively reduce the sale price by the cashback received. (or more realistically, negotiate a better discount with your account rep and just cut them a check.) part 3: would there be any difference between credit card points and brand-loyalty points? if the rental car were paid for with points earned directly on the rental car company's loyalty system (not a cc), would that yield a different result? there is no difference. perhaps the simplest way to think about this is you can only deduct an expense that you actually incur. in other words, the expense should show up on a bank or cc statement. this is why when you volunteer and work 10 hours for a charity, you can't call that a \"donation\" of any amount of money because there is no actual payment made that would show up on a bank statement. instead you could have billed the charity for your 10 hours of work, and then turned around and donated that same amount back to them, but it ends up being a wash.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why don't spy, spx, and the e-mini s&p 500 track perfectly with each other?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "as ross says, spx is the index itself. this carries no overheads. it is defined as a capitalization-weighted mixture of the stocks of (about) 500 companies. spy is an index fund that tries to match the performance of spx. as an index fund it has several differences from the index:", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what is a checking account and how does it work?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a checking account is one that permits the account holder to write demand drafts (checks), which can be given to other people as payment and processed by the banks to transfer those funds. (think of a check as a non-electronic equivalent of a debit card transaction, if that makes more sense to you.) outside of the ability to write checks, and the slightly lower interest rate usually offered to trade off against that convenience, there really is no significant difference between savings and checking accounts. the software needs to be designed to handle checking accounts if it's to be sold in the us, since many of us do still use checks for some transactions. adding support for other currencies doesn't change that. if you don't need the ability to track which checks have or haven't been fully processed, i'd suggest that you either simply ignore the checking account feature, or use this category separation in whatever manner makes sense for the way you want to manage your money.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can saving/investing 15% of your income starting age 25, likely make you a millionaire?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "millionaire, shmillionaire! let's do this calculation bruno mars style (i wanna be a billionaire...) if my calculations are correct, in the above scenario, at age 80, you would have more than a billion in the bank, after taxes.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what is the formula for determining estimated stock price when i only have an earning per share number?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "see this link...i was also looking an answer to the same questions. this site explains with an example http://www.independent-stock-investing.com/pe-ratio.html", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "i received $1000 and was asked to send it back. how was this scam meant to work?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i've skimmed through the answers given and i'd like do add another possible scenario. i've recently heard about this exact thing happening to someone only the money originally was a loan taken in the receivers name. 1) scumbag finds out personal data – including social number, bank account and phone – of innocent victim. 2) scumbag takes out a loan in the name of innocent victim. the money are sent to iv's account. 3) scumbag calls iv saying 'oh, i've made a mistake, blah, blah, yada, yada. could you please send the money back to me? my bank account is...' 4) innocent victim, being the good guy that he/she is, of course want to help out and send the money to scumbag. 5) scumbag makes a cash withdrawal and is no longer anywhere to be found and innocent victim is left with a loan but no money.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "i earn $75k, have $30k in savings, no debt, rent from my parents who are losing their home. should i buy a home now or save?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "for the vast majority, \"buying\" a house via a mortgage is not an investment. i use quotes around buying because from a technical perspective you don't own anything until you've paid it off; this is often an important point that people forget. it's highly unlikely you'll make more on it than the amount you put into it (interest, repairs, etc). even with relatively low interest rates. the people who successfully invest in homes are those that use actual cash (not borrowed) to buy a home at well below market value. they then clean it up and make enough repairs to make it marketable and sell it shortly there after. sometimes these people get hosed if the housing market tumbles to the point that the home is now worth less than the amount they put into it. this is especially problematic if they used bank loans to get the process going. they were actually the hardest hit when the housing bubble popped several years ago. well, them and the people who bought on interest only loans or had balloon payments. whereas the people who use a mortgage are essentially treating it like a bank account with a negative interest rate. for example, $180k loan on a 30 yr fixed at 4% will mean a total payout of around $310k, excluding normal repairs like roofs, carpet, etc. due to how mortgage's work, most of the interest is collected during the first half of the loan period. so selling it within 2 to 5 years is usually problematic unless the local housing market has really skyrocketed. housing markets move up and down all the time due to a hundred different things completely out of your control. it might be a regional depression, weather events, failed large businesses, failed city/local governments, etc. it could go up because businesses moved in, a new highway is built, state/local taxes decline, etc. my point is, homes are not long term investments. they can be short term ones, but only in limited circumstances and there is a high degree of risk involved. so don't let that be a driving point of your decision. instead you need to focus on other factors. such as: what is really going on with the house you are currently in? why would they lose it? can you help out, and, should you help out? if things are precarious, it might make more sense to sell that home now and everyone move into separate locations, possibly different rentals or apartments. if they are foreclosed on then they will be in a world of financial hurt for a long time. if we ignore your parents situation, then one piece of advice i would give you is this: rent the cheapest apartment you can find that is still a \"safe\" place to live in. put every dollar you can into some type of savings/investment that will actually grow. stay there for 5+ years, then go pay cash for a nice home. making $75k a year while single means that you don't need much to live on. in other words, live extremely cheap now so you can enjoy a fantastic living experience later that is free from financial fear. you should be able to put $30k+ per year aside going this route. edit: a bit of support data for those that somehow think buying a home on a mortgage is somehow a good investment: robert shiller, who won a nobel prize in economics and who predicted the bursting of the housing bubble, has shown that a house is not a good investment. why? first, home prices (adjusted for inflation) have been virtually unchanged for the past 100 years. (link 1, link 2) second, after you add in the costs of maintenance alone then those costs plus what you've paid for the home will exceed what you get out of it. adding in the cost of a mortgage could easily double or even triple the price you paid which makes things even worse. maintenance costs include things like a new roof, carpet/flooring, water heater, appliances, etc. yes, a home might cost you $100k and you might sell it for $200k after 15 years. however during that time you'll likely replace the roof ($10k to $20k), replace appliances ($2k to $5k), water heater ($1k), carpet/flooring ($5k to $20k), paint ($3k to $6k), and mortgage related costs (~$60k - assuming 30 yr fixed @4%). so your \"costs\" are between $180k and $200k just on those items. there are many more that could easily escalate the costs further. like a fence ($5k+), air conditioner ($5k+), windows, etc. the above is assuming the home actually appreciates in value faster than inflation: which they historically haven't over the long term. so you have to consider all of the costs ultimately paid to purchase and maintain the home vs the costs of renting during the same time period. point is: do your research and be realistic about it. buying a home is a huge financial risk.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "best starting options to invest for retirement without a 401k", "role": "user" }, { "content": "first, check out some of the answers on this question: oversimplify it for me: the correct order of investing when you have determined that you are ready to invest for retirement, there are two things you need to consider: the investment and the account. these are separate items. the investment is what makes your money grow. the type of account provides tax advantages (and restrictions). generally, these can be considered separately; for the most part, you can do any type of investment in any account. briefly, here is an overview of some of the main options: in your situation, the roth ira is what i would recommend. this grows tax free, and if you need the funds for some reason, you can get out what you put in without penalty. you can invest up to $5500 in your roth ira each year. in addition to the above reasons, which are true for anybody, a roth ira would be especially beneficial for you for three reasons: for someone that is closer in age to retirement and in a higher tax bracket now, a roth ira is less attractive than it is for you. inside your roth ira, there are lots of choices. you can invest in stocks, bonds, mutual funds (which are simply collections of stocks and bonds), bank accounts, precious metals, and many other things. discussing all of these investments in one answer is too broad, but my recommendation is this: if you are investing for retirement, you should be investing in the stock market. however, picking individual stocks is too risky; you need to be diversified in a lot of stocks. stock mutual funds are a great way to invest in the stock market. there are lots of different types of stock mutual funds with different strategies and expenses associated with them. managed funds actively buy and sell different stocks inside them, but have high expenses to pay the managers. index funds buy and hold a list of stocks, and have very low expenses. the conventional wisdom is that, in general, index funds perform better than managed funds when you take the expenses into account. i hope this overview and these recommendations were helpful. if you have any specific questions about any of these types of accounts or investments, feel free to ask another question.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "in what cases can a business refuse to take cash?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "they don't have to take cash if they reasonably told you in advance they don't take cash, because they made fair effort to prevent you from incurring a debt. they don't have to take cash if the transaction hasn't yet happened (not a debt) or if it can be easily undone at no cost to either party - such as a newspaper subscription they can just stop delivering. both of these reasons are limited by the rules against discrimination, see below. they don't have to take cash if it's impracticable. for instance a transit bus when fares first went to $1.00, it took years to fund new fareboxes able to take paper money. you don't have to take a mortgage payment in pennies. liquor stores don't have to take $100 bills. (it requires them to keep too much change in the till, which makes them a robbery target). trouble arises when it appears there's an ulterior motive for the rule. suppose a landlord jim requires rent to be paid with eft. rent-controlled marcie tells the judge \"it's a scheme to oust me, he knows i'm unbanked\". jim counters \"no. i got mugged last month because criminals know when i collect cash rents.\" it will turn on whether jim can show good-faith effort to work with his unbanked tenants to find other ways to pay. if jim does a particularly bad job of this, he could find himself paying marcie's legal bills! even worse if the ulterior motive is discrimination. chet the plumber hates muslims. alice the feed supplier hates the amish. so they decide to take credit cards only, knowing those people's religions don't allow them. their goose is cooked once they can't show any other reasonable reason to refuse cash.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "do i not have a credit score?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i'm the contrarian in the crowd. i think credit scores and debt are the closest thing to evil incarnate. you're in good company. the absence of a credit score simply means the agencies have insufficient data in their behavioral model to determine how profitable your business would be to the bank. the higher your score, the more likely the bank is to make a profit from your loan. imho, you're better off building up cash and investment reserves than a credit history. with sufficient reserves, you will be able to shop around for a bank that will give you a good rate, if you ever do need a loan. you'll be surprised at how quickly you get in a position where you don't need a loan if you save and invest wisely. i used to have a (high) credit score, and i was miserable about it because there were always bills due. i gave up debt 14 years ago, paid the last debt 7 years ago, and have never. been happier. raising kids without debt (or credit score) is much more fun than with debt.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what strategies can i employ to minimize estate taxes?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you want to leave your estate assets to your heirs, and you don't want them to be burdened with a huge tax bill. fortunately, there are many ways to maximize their tax savings through estate planning. if you can reduce your gross estate value to an amount that is lower than the federal threshold for the tax, your heirs can avoid the estate tax. let's review nine of the best ways to minimize your taxes. 1. make charitable donations, 2. set up a family limited partnership, 3. use the marital deduction, 4. set up a trust, 5. move to a state without estate taxes, 6. give gifts instead of inheritances, 7. set up a donor advised fund, 8. fund a qualified personal residence trust, 9. buy an extra life insurance policy to pay the tax.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "questioning my realtor", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a mortgage lender will not usually lend more than they could get if they had to repossess the property and sell it to recover their investment (in the u.s. it is generally accepted that 80% of market value is the golden number that makes the mortgage work). that's why an appraisal is required. even with 50% down, the numbers might not add up if your property is appraised very low (extremely unlikely, though. it's more likely your realtor is inexperienced).", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "should i pay cash or prefer a 0% interest loan for home furnishings?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "remember that due to inflation you are paying back the loan with cheaper dollars in the future. if there are no gimmicks in the loan like early payment penalties, or must pay by a certain date or that the credit was for a store that sold the products at a higher price than you could get elsewhere then you are not just getting free money they are paying you to take the money.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "missing opportunity cost of mortgage prepayment", "role": "user" }, { "content": "one other consideration is that by paying off your mortgage early versus, for example, investing that capital in a mutual fund is that you are reducing your net liquidity to some degree. that is, if you find yourself needing an emergency infusion of cash it is easier to sell a stock/fund than to sell your house or get a equity loan. i suppose if you were planning to need a lot of cash to start a business or invest in real estate, then maybe it would make sense to keep your cash more liquid. however, in your situation i agree with joe. pay it off. it feels really good to write that last check!", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can i determine how much my car insurance will cost me?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "accidents and tickets more than 3 years old generally won't affect you. i use an insurance broker who shops a bunch of different companies and buys me the best policy. (he gets a cut as a middle-man, but saves me more than going direct and gives great advice when i have a question.) since you haven't been only your own policy lately, it will cost you more than someone with a 3 year history with a perfect record, but if you shop around, you will find something at a fair price. also, your credit score often factors into the price you pay for car insurance also.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "should i pay off my credit card online immediately or wait for the bill?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "it probably doesn't matter since your credit and your checking are at the same institution, but i don't like to let my credit auto draft my checking. i always do it the other way around (and keep them at different places) i feel like there is more control when my money is gone that way.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what can cause rent prices to fall?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "sure! anything that affects the balance of supply and demand could cause rent prices to fall. i'll betcha rent prices in wilmington, ohio collapsed when the biggest employer, dhl, shut down. an economic depression of any sort would cause people to substitute expensive rentals for cheaper ones, putting downward pressure on rents. it would also cause people to double up or move in with family, decreasing demand for rentals. anything that makes buying a house cheaper will actually make rents lower, too, because more people will buy houses when houses get cheaper... those people are moving out of rentals, thus decreasing demand for rentals.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "dalbar: how can the average investor lose money?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "how is it possible for the average investor to underperform the market? the \"average\" investor probably makes some bad decisions. you also might need to take transaction costs into play (including borrowing on margin), so that there's a natural \"erosion\" of returns across the market. meaning if transaction/borrowing costs are 1%, and the market return is 5%, the \"average investor\" alternatively, if by \"average\" they mean the average of the population, not weighted by amount, it's plausible that the mass of smaller investors perform slightly worse than the smaller number of large investors (and have larger relative transaction costs), thus having a lower average on a per-capita basis. doesn't the fact that investors can consistently underperform the market by making poor decisions, imply that an investor could consistently outperform the market by making the opposite decisions? no. if my investment decisions cause me to earn only a 10% return compared to the \"average\" 12% return, then making the opposite decision will cause me to lose 10%, not to make 14%.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "at what point should i begin paying off student loans?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "all great answers. the only thing i didn't see mentioned was that student loans are not dischargable in a bankruptcy. so for example if you took money that could have gone to student loans and poured it into other debt, then for some reason declared bankruptcy later, your student load debt would remain while other debt would be discharged; essentially that money would have been better spent on the student loan. this isn't to advocate that you should pay down student loans with the intent of declaring bankruptcy, or that this makes it a better decision necessarily, just a factor that is sometimes forgotten.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can i buy a new house before selling my current house?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "as the other answers suggest, there are a number of ways of going about it and the correct one will be dependent on your situation (amount of equity in your current house, cashflow primarily, amount of time between purchase and sale). if you have a fair amount of equity (for example, $50k mortgage remaining on a house valued at $300k), i'll propose an option that's similar to bridge financing: place an offer on your new house. use some of your equity as part of the down payment (eg, $130k). use some more of your equity as a cash buffer to allow you pay two mortgages in between the purchase and the sale (eg, $30k). the way this would be executed is that your existing mortgage would be discharged and replaced with larger mortgage. the proceeds of that mortgage would be split between the down payment and cash as you desire. between the closing of your purchase and the closing of your sale, you'll be paying two mortgages and you'll be responsible for two properties. not fun, but your cash buffer is there to sustain you through this. when the sale of your new home closes, you'll be breaking the mortgage on that house. when you get the proceeds of the sale, it would be a good time to use any lump sum/prepayment privileges you have on the mortgage of the new house. you'll be paying legal fees for each transaction and penalties for each mortgage you break. however, the interest rates will be lower than bridge financing. for this reason, this approach will likely be cheaper than bridge financing only if the time between the closing of the two deals is fairly long (eg, at least 6 months), and the penalties for breaking mortgages are reasonable (eg, 3 months interest). you would need the help of a good mortgage broker and a good lawyer, but you would also have to do your own due diligence - remember that brokers receive a commission for each mortgage they sell. if you won't have any problems selling your current house quickly, bridge financing is likely a better deal. if you need to hold on to it for a while because you need to fix things up or it will be harder to sell, you can consider this approach.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how do i build wealth?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "many ceos i have heard of earn a lot more than 200k. in fact a lot earn more than 1m and then get bonuses as well. many wealthy people increase there wealth by investing in property, the stock market, businesses and other assets that will produce them good capital growth. oh yeh, and luck usually has very little to do with their success.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what do i need to start trading in the nse (national stock exchange)?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "yes, you can open a trading account at one place and a demat account at another place. therefore you can open trading account at sharekhan and demat account at obc. however, it would be more convenient for you if both the accounts are opened at the same place which would reduce unnecessary work after every transaction.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can i determine which stores are regarded as supermarkets for a rewards credit card?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "each company that has an account with the credit card network has to classify themselves as a particular type of business. the credit card company uses that classification to catagorize the transaction on your statement. if you buy a t-shirt at a grocery, amusement park, gas station, or resturant; the transaction will be labeled by the vendor type. look at recent credit card statements, even if they are from different cards, to see how the stores you want to know about are classified.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why does bank of america sometimes refer to itself as banc of america on some documents?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "from https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/banc: banq (also banc, banc-corp, bancorp, or bancorporation) is an intentionally erroneous spelling of the word bank, but pronounced the same way. it has been adopted by companies which are not banks but wish to appear as such, and satisfy legal restrictions on the usage of the word bank. ... for instance, if the original company is known as bank of america, then the new investment banking entity may be known as banc of america securities llc. if the original company is known as bank of manhattan, then its insurance business might be known as \"banc of manhattan insurance\" and its holding company might be called \"manhattan bancorp\". this practice originates from legal necessity: under the laws of most states, a corporation may only use the word \"bank\" in its name if it has obtained a banking charter under state or federal banking laws. so, \"banc of america\" is the subsidiary of boa that doesn't have appropriate licenses to be called \"bank\". wonders of complex regulation :)", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how is stock price determined?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "yes, stock price is determined by the last trade price. there are always going to be people who have put in a price to buy a stock (called a bid price) and people who have put in a price to sell a stock (called an ask price). based on your example, if the last trade price for the stock was $1.23, then you might have the following bid prices and ask prices: so if you put in a limit order to buy 100 shares at $100, you would buy the 40 shares at $1.23, the 15 shares at $1.24, and the 45 shares $1.25. the price of the stock would go up to $1.25. conversely, if you put in a limit order to sell 100 shares at $0.01 (i don't think any broker would allow a sell price of $0.00), you would sell 30 shares at $1.22, 20 shares at $1.21, and 50 shares at $1.20. the price of the stock would go down to $1.20.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "buying a house, how much should my down payment be?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the reason to put more money down or accept a shorter maximum term is because the bank sweetens the deal (or fails to sour it in some fashion). for example, typically, if there is less than 20% down, you have to pay an premium called \"private mortgage insurance\", which makes it bad deal. but i see banks offering the same rate for a 15%-year mortgage as for a 30-year one, and i think: fools and their money. take the 30-year and, if you feel like it pay more every month. although why you would feel like it, i don't know, since it's very difficult to get that money back if you need it.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can i pay for school to finish my degree when i can't get a student loan and have bad credit?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "here's what you can do: roll up your sleeves and get to work. work 2 or 3 jobs while you take 12 credit hours. live in the cheapest available housing (that is reasonably safe). have no social life. wake up, work, class, eat, work, study, sleep. every day. don't eat at restaurants. eat only simple meals at home. every meal. have a car payment? get rid of your car and use public transit or get the cheapest running car possible. one year of nothing but focused effort on paying for and finishing school. if you can't earn enough to cover 14k on top of your basic living expenses, then you aren't working hard enough, or you have extenuating circumstances that make finishing your degree at this time infeasible.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "where can i find the nominal price of a stock prior a split into multiple companies?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "when hewlett packard split they changed their name to hp inc. and spun off hewlett packard enterprise as a new corporation. this means hp inc. has the same stock history and ticker (hpq) as hewlett packard did so that's the one you want to search for. as you noticed this also means it's impossible to search for old hewlett packard's stock performance alone. one free service that seems to show the unadjusted historical stock price of hpq is google finance: https://www.google.com/finance?q=nyse%3ahpq", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what is a good asset allocation for a 25 year old?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in my opinion, the key variable for you (and others) is not age, but \"vintage.\" your \"age\" suggests that you were born in the mid-1980s, in the middle of a bull market. the most remunerative investing periods for you are likely to be in your childhood (past) and middle age (forties and early fifties). also your, \"old-old\" period (around age 80, in the 2060s), if you live that long. for now, you can, and perhaps should invest cautiously, like today's 40-year olds, with a heavy emphasis on bonds. the main difference between you and them is that you can shift to stocks in about ten years, in your mid to late 30s, while they will find it harder to do so when approaching old age.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is it accurate to say that if i was to trade something, my probability of success can't be worse than random?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in theory, in a perfect world, what you state is almost true. apart from transaction fees, if you assume that the market is perfectly efficient (ie: public information is immediately reflected in a perfect reflection of future share value, in all share prices when the information becomes available), then in theory any transaction you would choose to take is opposed by a reasonable person who is not taking advantage of you, just moving their position around. this would make any and all transactions completely reasonable from a cost-benefit perspective. ie: if the future value of all dividends to be paid by apple [ie: the value of holding a share in apple] exactly matches apple's share price of $1,000, then buying a share for $1,000 is an even trade. selling a share for $1,000 is also an even trade. now in a perfectly efficient market, which we have assumed, then there is no edge to valuing a company using your own methods. if you take apple's financial statements / press releases / reported information, and if you apply modern financial theory to evaluate the future dividends from apple, you should get the same $1,000 share price that the market has already arrived at. so in this example, why wouldn't you just throw darts at a printout of the s&p 500 and invest in whatever it lands on? because, even if the 'perfectly efficient market' agrees on the true value of something, different investments have different characteristics. as an example, consider a simple comparison of corporate bonds: corporations make bond offerings to the public, allowing individual investors to effectively lend money to the corporation, for a future benefit. for simplicity, assume a bond with a 'face value' (the amount to be repaid to the investor on maturity) of $1,000 has these 3 defining characteristics: (1) the price [what the investor pays to acquire it]; (2) interest payments [how much, if any, the corporation will pay to the investor before maturity, and when those payments will be made]; and (3) a bond rating [which is a third party assessment of how risky the bond is, based on the 'health' of the corporation]. now if the bond rating agency is perfect in its risk assessment, and if the price of all bond's is fair, then why does it matter who you loan your money to? it matters because different people want different things out of their investments. if you are waiting to make a down payment on a house next year, then you don't want risk - you want to be certain that you will get your cash back, even if it means lower returns. so, even though a high-risk bond may be perfectly priced, it should only be bought by someone willing to bear that risk. if you are retired, and you need your bonds to pay you interest regularly as your sole source of income, then of course a zero-coupon bond [one that pays no interest] is not helpful to you. if you are young, and have a long time to invest, then you may want risk, because you have time to overcome losses and you want to get the most return possible. in addition, taxes are not universal between all investors. some people benefit from things that would be tax-heavy to their neighbors. for example in canada, there is a 'dividend tax credit' which reduces the taxes owing on dividends received by a corporation. this credit exists to prevent 'double-taxation', because otherwise the corporation would pay its ~30% of tax, and then a wealthy investor would pay another ~45% of tax. due to the mechanics of how the credit is calculated, however, someone who makes less money, gets an even lower tax bill than they normally would. this means that someone making under the top tax bracket in canada, has a tax benefit by receiving dividends. this means that while 2 stocks may be both fairly priced, if one pays dividends and the other doesn't [ie: if the other company instead reinvests more heavily in future projects, creating even more value for shareholders down the road], then someone in the bottom tax brackets may want the dividend paying stock more than the other. in conclusion: picking investments yourself does require some knowledge to prevent yourself from making a 'bad buy'; this is because the market is not perfectly efficient. as well, specific market mechanics make some trades more costly than they should be in theory; consider for example transaction fees and tax mechanics. finally, even if you assume that all of the above is irrelevant as a theoretical idea, different investors still have different needs. just because $1,000,000 is the 'fair' price for a factory in your home town, doesn't mean you might as well convert your retirement savings to buy it as your sole asset.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "uk university student finance - should i use my sponsorship money to pay the debt?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "borrow the lot (as your family recommended)! the extra money will come in useful when you want to buy a house and move back to the area where your employer is. the government loan in the uk is a fantastic system, just a shame they are charging you so much in tuition fees...", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "real estate: please review my recent investment (with numbers from recent purchase)", "role": "user" }, { "content": "okay so i am going to break this answer into a couple sections: okay so first things first. did you get a good deal? this is challenging to answer for a number of reasons. first, a good deal is relative to the buyers goals. if you're attempting to buy an asset that provides passive income then maybe you met your goal and got a good deal. if you're attempting to buy an asset that provides long term growth, and you purchased above market (i'm speculating of course) then you may have made a bad deal. so how do you determine if you got a good deal? does your \"gross rental multiplier\" equal that or is less than that of the average grm in your area. the lower the better. so how do you use the grm to determine if you're getting a good deal? divide your purchase price by the average city (or area) grm and that will tell you what you should be getting annually in rent. you can also use the grm to determine if a future purchase is over or under priced. just replace purchase price with asking price. alright, so these are the tools you can use to decide if you made a bad business deal or not. there are many ways to skin a cat so to speak. these are the tools i use before i purchase a home. many people are penny wise and pound foolish. take your time when making large purchases. it's okay to say pass. okay next thing is this new purchase you're looking at. the number one rule when working a franchise is you don't open a second store until you have a perfect working model to go off of. if you've never had to file a tax return for your current rental. then you need to wait. if you've never read your local and state rental laws. then you need to wait. if you've never had to leave an event early, wake up in the middle of the night, or get a text while you're on a date from one of your tenants. then you need to wait. give it a year or two. just learn the unknown about rental properties. use your first as your test bed. it's way more cheaper then if you make a bad mistake and roll it over multiple properties. finally i will leave you with this. no one on this site, myself included, knows everything there is to know about real estate. anyone that claims they do, send their ass packing. this is a complex complex business. there is always something to learn and if you don't have the passion to continue learning then hand it off to someone who does. there is tax law, rental law, city repair law, contract law and this doesn't even include the stuff that makes you money, like knowing how to leverage low or no money down loans. please take some time and go out and learn. good luck! -ar", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what taxes are assessed on distributions of an inherited ira?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "all transactions within an ira are irrelevant as far as the taxation of the distributions from the ira are concerned. you can only take cash from an ira, and a (cash) distribution from a traditional ira is taxable as ordinary income (same as interest from a bank, say) without the advantage of any of the special tax rates for long-term capital gains or qualified dividends even if that cash was generated within the ira from sales of stock etc. in short, just as with what is alleged to occur with respect to las vegas, what happens within the ira stays within the ira. note: some ira custodians are willing to make a distribution of stock or mutual fund shares to you, so that ownership of the 100 shares of ge, say, that you hold within your ira is transferred to you in your personal (non-ira) brokerage account. but, as far as the irs is concerned, your ira custodian sold the stock as the closing price on the day of the distribution, gave you the cash, and you promptly bought the 100 shares (at the closing price) in your personal brokerage account with the cash that you received from the ira. it is just that your custodian saved the transaction fees involved in selling 100 shares of ge stock inside the ira and you saved the transaction fee for buying 100 shares of ge stock in your personal brokerage account. your basis in the 100 shares of ge stock is the \"cash_ that you imputedly received as a distribution from the ira, so that when you sell the shares at some future time, your capital gains (or losses) will be with respect to this basis. the capital gains that occurred within the ira when the shares were imputedly sold by your ira custodian remain within the ira, and you don't get to pay taxes on that at capital gains rates. that being said, i would like to add to what nathanl told you in his answer. your mother passed away in 2011 and you are now 60 years old (so 54 or 55 in 2011?). it is likely that your mother was over 70.5 years old when she passed away, and so she likely had started taking required minimum distributions from her ira before her death. so, you should have been taking rmds from the inherited ira starting with year 2012. (the rmd for 2011, if not taken already by your mother before she passed away, should have been taken by her estate, and distributed to her heirs in accordance with her will, or, if she died intestate, in accordance with state law and/or probate court directives). there would not have been any 10% penalty tax due on the rmds taken by you on the grounds that you were not 59.5 years old as yet; that rule applies to owners (your mom in this case) and not to beneficiaries (you in this case). so, have you taken the rmds for 2012-2016? or were you waiting to turn 59.5 before taking distributions in the mistaken belief that you would have to pay a 10% penalty for early wthdrawal? the penalty for not taking a rmd is 50% of the amount not distributed; yes, 50%. if you didn't take rmds from the inherited ira for years 2012-2016, i recommend that you consult a cpa with expertise in tax law. ask the cpa if he/she is an enrolled agent with the irs: enrolled agents have to pass an exam administered by the irs to show that they really understand tax law and are not just blowing smoke, and can represent you in front of the irs in cases of audit etc,", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why do americans have to file taxes, even if their only source of income is from a regular job?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "for two reasons: 1- people are entitled to deductions and credits that your employer cannot possibly know. only you as an individual know about your personal situation and can therefore claim these deductions and credits by filing income tax returns. 2- me telling you that you made $100,000 last year is not the same as telling you that you made $125,000 last year, but someone took $25,000 out of your pocket. tax season is the one time of the year when citizens know exactly what chunk of their hard earned money was taken by the government, creating more collective awareness about taxation and giving politicians a harder time when they propose raising taxes.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why would a stock opening price differ from the offering price?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the offering price is what the company will raise by selling the shares at that price. however, this isn't usually what the general public sees as often there will be shows to drive up demand so that there will be buyers for the stock. that demand is what you see on the first day when the general public can start buying the stock. if one is an employee, relative or friend of someone that is offered, \"friends and family\" shares they may be able to buy at the offering price. pricing of ipo from wikipedia states around the idea of pricing: a company planning an ipo typically appoints a lead manager, known as a bookrunner, to help it arrive at an appropriate price at which the shares should be issued. there are two primary ways in which the price of an ipo can be determined. either the company, with the help of its lead managers, fixes a price (\"fixed price method\"), or the price can be determined through analysis of confidential investor demand data compiled by the bookrunner (\"book building\"). historically, some ipos both globally and in the united states have been underpriced. the effect of \"initial underpricing\" an ipo is to generate additional interest in the stock when it first becomes publicly traded. flipping, or quickly selling shares for a profit, can lead to significant gains for investors who have been allocated shares of the ipo at the offering price. however, underpricing an ipo results in lost potential capital for the issuer. one extreme example is theglobe.com ipo which helped fuel the ipo \"mania\" of the late 90's internet era. underwritten by bear stearns on november 13, 1998, the ipo was priced at $9 per share. the share price quickly increased 1000% after the opening of trading, to a high of $97. selling pressure from institutional flipping eventually drove the stock back down, and it closed the day at $63. although the company did raise about $30 million from the offering it is estimated that with the level of demand for the offering and the volume of trading that took place the company might have left upwards of $200 million on the table. the danger of overpricing is also an important consideration. if a stock is offered to the public at a higher price than the market will pay, the underwriters may have trouble meeting their commitments to sell shares. even if they sell all of the issued shares, the stock may fall in value on the first day of trading. if so, the stock may lose its marketability and hence even more of its value. this could result in losses for investors, many of whom being the most favored clients of the underwriters. perhaps the best known example of this is the facebook ipo in 2012. underwriters, therefore, take many factors into consideration when pricing an ipo, and attempt to reach an offering price that is low enough to stimulate interest in the stock, but high enough to raise an adequate amount of capital for the company. the process of determining an optimal price usually involves the underwriters (\"syndicate\") arranging share purchase commitments from leading institutional investors. some researchers (e.g. geoffrey c., and c. swift, 2009) believe that the underpricing of ipos is less a deliberate act on the part of issuers and/or underwriters, than the result of an over-reaction on the part of investors (friesen & swift, 2009). one potential method for determining underpricing is through the use of ipo underpricing algorithms. this may be useful for seeing the difference in that \"theglobe.com\" example where the offering price is $9/share yet the stock traded much higher than that initially.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "should i pay half a large balance this month before i get my cc statement?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "utilization is near real-time. what that means is that what is reported is what is taken in terms of debt-to-income (dti) ratios. when a mortgage broker pulls your credit, they will pull the latest balances with the minimum payments. this is what is taken to determine dti along with your gross monthly income. if you do not pay your account in full before the statement date, then you more than likely will have to wait an additional statement cycle before it reports to the credit bureaus. therefore, your utilization is dynamic and the history of your utilization month-to-month is not recorded forever. only the current balance. what is maintained and reported is your payment history. so you want to never be late if you want to be approved anytime soon for a mortgage. a lower dti will not help your interest rate. as long as you stay away from the maximum dti for the mortgage vehicle you are attempting to be approved for (va, fha, conventional, etc), then your dti should not be a concern. if you are borderline at the time of underwriting, you can take the opportunity and pay off the balances. the mortgage company can then do what is called a credit supplement which entails contacting those lenders where you have proven you have a zero balance and manually input the zero balance cards, that have not yet reported to the bureaus, in your final application to the mortgage company for underwriting approval.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "buying a house for a shorter term", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if there are a lot of houses for sale, can you be sure that in a year or two you can sell yours? how long does the average house in that area stay on the market before it is sold? what percentage of houses never get sold? if it can't be sold due to the crowded market you will be forced to rent the house. the question for you then is how much rental income can you get? compare the rental income to your monthly cost of owning, and managing the house. one benefit to buying a house in a market that is easy to rent a house would be if you are forced to move quickly, then you aren't stuck being 3 months into a 12 month lease. keep in mind that markets can change rather dramatically in just a few years. housing costs were flat for much of the 90's, then rocketed up in the first half of the last decade, and after a big drop, they are one a slow climb back up. but the actual path they are on depends on the part of the us you are in. the rule of thumb in the past was based on the fact that over a few years the price would rise enough overcome the closing costs on the two transactions. unfortunately the slow growth in the 90's meant that many had to bring checks to closing because the equity gained wasn't enough to overcome the closing costs due to low down payment loans. the fast growth period meant that people got into exotic loans to maximize the potential income when prices were going up 10-20% a year. when prices dropped some found that they bought houses they couldn't afford, but couldn't sell to break even on the transaction. they were stuck and had to default on the mortgage. in fact i have never seen a time frame when the rule of thumb ever applied.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how is a probability cone read?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a number of ways exist to calculate the chances of a particular outcome. options, for example, use current price, cost of money, and volatility among other factors to price the chance of an underlying asset reaching a certain price in a certain timeframe. a graphical forecast simply puts these calculations into a visual format. that said, it appears the image you offer shows the prediction as it existed in the past along with how the stock has done since. a disclaimer - the odds of a fair die being rolled to a given number are 1 in 6. it's a fact. with stocks, on the other hand, models try to simulate real life and many factors can't be accounted for.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "disputing items to improve credit report", "role": "user" }, { "content": "disputing the remark seems unlikely to move your score, since it is just that -- a remark. it's hard to say whether the scoring models can/do read the remarks and incorporate them (somehow) into the scoring metric itself. disputing the revolving account that should be reported as closed is a different matter. the question there would be what the status of that account is/was. in other words, is it showing as an open collection or some other status which would indicate the creditor still has a pending claim? if so, disputing it might have some effect, although nobody would be able to tell you for certain or even how much your score might be affected. if, as you say, that account should have been part of the bankruptcy package then getting that corrected could be important enough to achieve what you're looking for. you can try it and see, but even if the effect is minor, you still want your credit report to be a true reflection of the facts. i hope this helps. good luck!", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "paying extra on a mortgage. how much can i save? [duplicate]", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if you're truly ready to pay an extra $1000 every month, and are confident you'll likely always be able to, you should refinance to a 15 year mortgage. 15 year mortgages are typically sold at around a half a point lower interest rates, meaning that instead of your 4.375% apr, you'll get something like 3.875% apr. that's a lot of money over the course of the mortgage. you'll end up paying around a thousand a month more - so, exactly what you're thinking of doing - and not only save money from that earlier payment, but also have a lower interest rate. that 0.5% means something like $25k less over the life of the mortgage. it's also the difference in about $130 or so a month in your required payment. now of course you'll be locked into making that larger payment - so the difference between what you're suggesting and this is that you're paying an extra $25k in exchange for the ability to pay it off more slowly (in which case you'd also pay more interest, obviously, but in the best case scenario). in the 15 year scenario you must make those ~$4000 payments. in the 30 year scenario you can pay ~$2900 for a while if you lose your job or want to go on vacation or ... whatever. of course, the reverse is also true: you'll have to make the payments, so you will. many people find enforced savings to be a good strategy (myself among them); i have a 15 year mortgage and am happy that i have to make the higher payment, because it means i can't spend that extra money frivolously. so what i'd do if i were you is shop around for a 15 year refi. it'll cost a few grand, so don't take one unless you can save at least half a point, but if you can, do.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "canadian personal finance software with ability to export historical credit card transactions?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "yodlee and mint are good solutions if you don't mind your personal financial information being stored \"in the cloud\". i do, so i use quicken. quicken stores whatever you give to it for as long as you want: so the only question is how to get the credit card transactions you want into it? all my financial institutions allow me to view my credit card statements for a year back, and download them in a form quicken can read. so you can have a record of your transactions from a year ago right now, and in a year you will have two year's worth.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "ordering from canada, charged in cad or usd?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "typically, businesses always charge their 'home' currency, so if the shop is in canada, you will pay canadian dollars. normally you don't have any choices either. your credit card company will convert it to your currency, using the current international currency exchange rate (pretty good), plus a potential fee between 0 and 5% - depending on your credit card (not so good). if it is a significant amount, or you plan to do that more than once, and if you have multiple credit cards, check first to see which one has the lowest international fee; 0% is not uncommon, but neither is 3 or 4%. if it's a 10$ thingy, it's probably not worth the time; but 4% of 1000 is already 40$... as of right now, the currency exchange rate is 1.33, so you would pay ~75 usd; plus the potential fee, 0$ - 4$. understand that this exchange rate is floating continuously; it probably won't change much, but it will change.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why does exxonmobil's balance sheet show more liabilities than assets?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i believe you are missing knowledge of how to conduct a ratio analysis. understanding liquidity ratios, specifically the quick or acid-test ratio will be of interest and help your understanding. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/acidtest.asp help with conducting a ratio analysis. http://www.demonstratingvalue.org/resources/financial-ratio-analysis finally, after working through the definitions, this website will be of use. https://www.stock-analysis-on.net/nyse/company/exxon-mobil-corp/ratios/liquidity", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "taking a car loan vs cash and effect on credit score", "role": "user" }, { "content": "imagine that your normal mode of using credit gets you a score of x. as time goes by your score trends upward if the positive items (length of credit) outweigh your negative items. but there are no big increases or decrease in your score. then you make a one time change to how you use credit. if this is a event that helps your score, there will be a increase in your score. if it is bad thing your score will drop. but if you go back to your standard method of operating your score will drift back to the previous range. getting a car loan for a few months to get a bump in your credit score, will not sustain your score at the new level indefinitely. overtime the impact will lessen, and the score will return your your normal range. spending money on the loan just to buy a temporary higher credit score is throwing away money.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "a guy scammed me, but he gave me a bank account number & routing number. can i use that to take out what he owes me?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you're potentially in very deep water here. you don't know who this person is that you're dealing with. before you'd even met him, he just gave you his banking info, seemingly without a second thought. you have no idea what the sources of his money are, so what happens if the money is stolen or otherwise illegal? if it is determined that you used any of that money, you'll be on the hook to return it, at the very least. who knows what the legal ramifications are either? so it sounds like you began spending his money before you had any kind of written agreement in place? doesn't that seem odd to you to have someone just so trusting as to not even ask for that? was the source of the email about the $2500 from paypal, or from him or his advisor? paypal always sends you a notice directly when funds are received into your account, and even if they were going to put a temporary hold on them for whatever reason (sometimes they do that), it would still show up in your account. i would highly (can i be more emphatic?) advise you not to go anywhere near his bank account until or unless you can absolutely verify who he is, where his money comes from, and what the situation is. if you start dipping into his account, whether you think you're somehow entitled to the money or not, he could cry foul and have you arrested for theft. this is a very odd situation, and for someone who says he's normally cautious and skeptical, you sure let your guard down here when you started spending his money without making any serious effort to confirm his bona fides. just because he passes himself off as smart and the \"doctor type\" doesn't mean squat. the very best scammers can do that (ever see the movie \"catch me if you can\", based on a true story?), so you have no basis for knowing he's anything at all. i am thoroughly confused as to why you'd just willfully start using his money without knowing anything about him. that's deeply disconcerting, because you've opened yourself up to a world of potential criminal and civil liability if this situation goes south. if this guy was giving you money as an investment in your business and you instead used some of that money for your own personal expenses then you could land in very serious trouble for co-mingling of funds. even if he told you it was okay, it doesn't sound like there's anything in writing, so he could just as easily deny giving you permission to use the money that way and have you charged with embezzlement. you need to step back, take a deep breath, stop using his money, and contact a lawyer for advice. every attorney will give you a free consultation, and you need to protect yourself here. be careful, my friend. if this makes you suspicious then you need to listen to that voice in your head and find a way to get out of this situation.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "for insurance, why should you refuse $4,000/year for only 10 years and prefer $500/year indefinitely?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the breakeven amount isn't at 8 years. you calculated how many years of paying $500 it would take to break even with one year of paying $4000. 8 x 10 years = 80 years. so by paying $500/year it will take you 80 years to have spent the same amount ($40000 total) as you did in 10 years. at this point it may seem obvious what the better choice is. consider where you'll be after 10 years: in scenario #1 you've spent $5000 ($500*10) and have to continue spending $500/year indefinitely. in scenario #2 you've spent $40000 ($4000*10) and don't have to pay any more, but you currently have $35000 ($40000 - $5000) less than you did in scenario #1. if you had stayed with scenario #1 you could invest that $35000 at a measly 1.43% annual return and cover the $500 payments indefinitely without ever dipping into your remaining $35000. most likely over the long term you'll do better than 1.43% per year and come out far ahead.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "1099 misc for taking care of foreign exchange students", "role": "user" }, { "content": "according to intuit, you cannot claim the $50 charitable contribution, so the entire $2000 / month will be taxable instead of $1900. that's only an extra $35 if your combined tax rate is 35%. as ttt mentioned, do this for the experience, not for the money. my wife and i have been hosting international students for 10 years now. https://ttlc.intuit.com/questions/3152069-i-received-a-1099-misc-employee-compensation-for-hosting-a-foreign-exchange-student-can-i-complete-a-schedule-c-for-the-expenses", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "do banks cause inflation? what are other possible causes?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no, it isn't generally believed that inflation is caused by individual banks printing money. governments manage money supply through central banks (which may, or may not, be independent of the state). there are a number of theories about money supply and inflation (from monetarist, to keynesian, and so on). the quantity theory of inflation says that long-term inflation is the result of money-supply but short-term inflation is related to events/local conditions. short-term inflation is a symptom of economic change. it's like a cough for a doctor. it simply indicates an underlying event. when prices go up it encourages new producers to enter the market, create new supply which will then act to lower prices. in this way inflation is managed by ensuring that information travels throughout the economy. if prices go up for specific goods, then - all things being equal - supply should go up since the increase implies increasing demand. if prices go down then this implies demand has gone down and so producers will reduce supply. obviously this isn't a perfect relationship. there is \"stickiness\" which can be caused by a whole bunch of market conditions (from banning of short-selling, to inelasticity of demand/supply). your question isn't about quantitative easing (which is a state-led way of increasing money-supply and which could increase inflation but is hoped to increase expenditure and investment) so i won't cover that here. the important take-away is that inflation is an essential price signal to investors and business people so that they can assess market cycles. without it we would end up with vast over- or under-supply and much greater economic disruption.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "any advantage to exercising iso's in company that is not yet public?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "as far as i know, the amt implications are the same for a privately held company as for one that is publicly traded. when i was given my iso package, it came with a big package of articles on amt to encourage me to exercise as close to the strike price as possible. remember that the further the actual price at the time of purchase is from the strike price, the more the likely liability for amt. that is an argument for buying early. your company should have a common metric for determining the price of the stock that is vetted by outside sources and stable from year to year that is used in a similar way to the publicly traded value when determining amt liability. during acquisitions stock options often, from what i know of my industry, at least, become options in the new company's stock. this won't always happen, but its possible that your options will simply translate. this can be valuable, because the price of stock during acquisition may triple or quadruple (unless the acquisition is helping out a very troubled company). as long as you are confident that the company will one day be acquired rather than fold and you are able to hold the stock until that one day comes, or you'll be able to sell it back at a likely gain, other than tying up the money i don't see much of a downside to investing now.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what happens to bonds values when interest rates rise? [duplicate]", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you can look at tips (which have some inflation protection built in). generally short term bonds are better than long if you expect rates to rise soon. other ways that you can protect yourself are to choose higher yield corporate bonds instead of government bonds, or to use foreign bonds. there are plenty of bond funds like templeton global or etfs that offer such features. find one that will work for you.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why don't institutions share stock recommendations like wall street analysts?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "primarily because they don't want big price movements when they are in the market. if they spook the markets, either they have to buy at a higher price, or they sell at a lower price or they decrease the price of their holdings(which isn't always a big factor). the 3 situations they didn't want to be in the first place. and the most important thing is most analysts are dumb bozos, whom you should ignore. they tout because they want to increase their exposure in your eyes, so that they may land a job in one of those big investment companies, or they might be holding stocks and want to profit from it. frankly speaking if you take advice from the so called analysts, be prepared to say goodbye to your money some day, mayn't be always. one near case maybe carson block from muddy waters, but he does his homework properly.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "pros/cons for buying gold vs. saving money in an interest-based account?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "what you are seeing is the effects of inflation. as money becomes less valuable it takes more of it to buy physical things, be they commodities, shares in a company's stock, and peoples time (salaries). just about the only thing that doesn't track inflation to some degree is cash itself or money in an account since that is itself what is being devalued. so the point of all this is, buying anything (a house, gold, stocks) that doesn't depreciate (a car) is something of a hedge against inflation. however, don't be tricked (as many are) into thinking that house just made you a tidy sum just because it went up in value so much over x years. remember 1) all the other houses and things you'd spend the money on are a lot more expensive now too; and 2) you put a lot more money into a house than the mortgage payment (taxes, insurance, maintenance, etc.) i'm with the others though. don't get caught up in the gold bubble. doing so now is just speculation and has a lot of risk associated with it.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "side work and managing finances?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i have done similar software work. you do not need an llc to write off business expenses. the income and expenses go on schedule c of your tax return. it is easy to write off even small expenses such as travel - if you keep records. the income should be reported to you on a 1099 form, filled out by your client, not yourself. for a financial advisor you should find one you can visit with personally and who operates as a \"fee-only\" advisor. that means they will not try to sell you something that they get a commission on. you might pay a few $hundred per visit. there are taxes that you have to pay (around 15%) due to self-employment income. these taxes are due 4 times a year and paid with an \"estimated tax\" form. see the irs web site, and in particular schedule se. get yourself educated about this fast and make the estimated tax payments on time so you won't run into penalties at the end of the year.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can i make a profit by selling a stock short?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "being \"long\" - expecting the price to go up to make a profit - is a two step process: 1) buy 2) sell being \"short\" - expecting the price to go down to make a profit - is a 5 step process: 1) borrow someone else's asset 2) sell their asset on the open market to somebody else a third party 3) pocket the proceeds of the sell for your own account 4) buy an identical asset for a cheaper price 5) return this identical asset to the person that let you borrow their asset if this is successful you keep the difference between 3) and 4)", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is 6% too high to trade stocks on margin?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "that seems a little high in my experience. i've used a home equity line of credit instead, as the rates are much lower (~3.5%).", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "need to change cash to cashier's check without bank account (just arrived to the us)", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the easiest thing would be to go to walmart and stock up on 1000$ money orders paying a 70 cents fee for each. your landlord would almost certainly accept money orders, but double check first just in case. i say stock up because you can't get a money order for more than 1000$ and they usually won't let you buy more than 3 per day. alternatively, you can probably open a bank account using your ssn and your passport. look for any bank offering \"free\" checking, and they should be able to give you a few \"starter\" checks on the spot when you open the account. in any case, they can certainly get you a cashier's check for free or a small fee. side note: if you want to shop around for a checking account, look for a bank or credit union offering a \"kasasa\" account.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is this money laundering?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "or is this a form of money laundering? may not be, generally the amounts involved in money laundering are much higher. so if there are quite a few such transactions then yes it could be money laundering. it could also be for circumventing taxes, depending on country regulations one may try to do this to get around gift taxes etc. in this specific case it looks more of link harvesting / seo optimization. take a low cost item that is often searched and link to other product. if you see the company link on amazon; cougar takes you to shoes. so maybe on its own cougar shoes does not rank high, so link it with similar name brand in different segment and try to boost the link.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "investing in real estate when the stock market is high, investing in stocks when it's low?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the right time to buy real estate is easy to spot. it's when it is difficult to get loans or when real estate agents selling homes are tripping over each other. it's the wrong time to buy when houses are sold within hours of the sign going up. the way to profit from equities over time is to dollar-cost average a diversified portfolio over time, while keeping cash reserves of 5-15% around. when major corrections strike, buy a little extra. you can make money at trading. but it requires that you exert a consistent effort and stay up to date on your investments and future prospects.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is weiss research, inc. a legitimate financial research company?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "this company was a reputable rating agency for many years. see weiss research website, ratings section for a very different perspective on martin weiss's work than the websites with which he is now associated. i checked both links provided, and agree with the questioner in every way: these appear to be highly questionable investment research websites. i use such strong terms based on the fact that the website actually uses the distasteful pop-up ploy, \"are you sure you want to leave this site?\" clearly, something changed between what weiss ratings was in the past (per company history since 1971) and what martin weiss is doing now. larry edelson seems to have been associated exclusively with questionable websites and high pressure investment advice since 2007. from 1996 through the present, he worked as either an employee or contractor of weiss research. let's answer each of your questions. on june 22, 2006, the commission instituted settled administrative proceedings against weiss research, inc., martin weiss, and lawrence edelson (collectively, “respondents”) for violations of the investment advisers act of 1940 in connection with their operation of an unregistered investment adviser and the production and distribution of materially false and misleading marketing materials. full details about weiss ratings operations, including its history from 1996 through 2001, when it operated in compliance with securities laws, then from 2001 through 2005, which was when the sec filed charges for regulatory violations, are available from the june 2006 u.s. sec court documents pdf. finally, this quantitative assessment, \"safe with martin weiss? (december 2010) by cxo advisory (providers of \"objective research and reviews to aid investing decisions\") for its readers concluded the following: in summary, the performance of martin weiss’ premium services in aggregate over the past year is unimpressive. the study methodology was good, but i recommend reading the article (i posted the url) to fully understand what caveats and assumptions were done to reach that conclusion.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "will i be paid dividends if i own shares?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "yes, as long as you own the shares before the ex-dividend date you will get the dividends. depending on your instructions to your broker, you can receive cash dividends or you can have the dividends reinvested in more shares of the company. there are specific dividend reinvestment plans (or drips) if you are after stock growth rather than income from dividend payments.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "when are investments taxed?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "an investment is sold when you sell that particular stock or fund. it doesn't wait until you withdraw cash from the brokerage account. whether an investment is subject to long term or short term taxes depends on how long you held that particular stock. sorry, you can't get around the higher short term tax by leaving the money in a brokerage account or re-investing in something else. if you are invested in a mutual fund, whether it's long or short term depends on when you buy and sell the fund. the fact that the fund managers are buying and selling behind your back doesn't affect this. (i don't know what taxes they have to pay, maybe you really are paying for it in the form of management fees or lower returns, but you don't explicitly pay the tax on these \"inner\" transactions.) your broker should send you a tax statement every year giving the numbers that you need to fill in to the various boxes of your income tax form. you don't have to figure it out. of course it helps to know the rules. if you've held a stock for 11 1/2 months and are planning to sell, you might want to consider waiting a couple of weeks so it becomes a long term capital gain rather than short term and thus subject to lower tax.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "mutual fund invests in mostly the same stuff as etf, but has much higher expense ratio? (biotech sector)", "role": "user" }, { "content": "index funds, like ibb, generally lack active management, which equates to lower expenses. this is simply because the target index, the nasdaq biotechnology index in the case of ibb, is composed of known quantities. this means there won't be stock pickers or analysts constantly swapping holdings, increasing the turnover rate of the portfolio and increasing capital gains; costs that are offset by higher expense ratios in more actively managed funds.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what is inflation?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "money itself has no value. a gold bar is worth (fuzzy rushed math, could be totally wrong on this example figure) $423,768.67. so, a 1000 dollars, while worthless paper, are a token saying that you own %.2 of a gold bar in the federal reserve. if a billion dollars are printed, but no new gold is added to the treasury, then your dollar will devalue, and youll only have %.1 percent of that gold bar (again, made up math to describe a hypothetical). when dollars are introduced into the economy, but gold has not been introduced to back it up, things like the government just printing dollars or banks inventing money out of debt (see the housing bubble), then the dollar tokens devalue further. tl;dr: inflation is the ratio of actual wealth in the treasury to the amount of currency tokens the treasury has printed.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "using marine traffic (ais) to make stock picks?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you can. speculating on marine traffic is more closely tied to oil trades and ocean shipping container rates, than trades on any particular companies. but companies heavily tied to ocean shipping can be ripe for speculation. the baltic dry index is created for this analytical purpose, and that information can be used as an indicator to hedge or speculate in container freight swap agreements. the guggenheim shipping exchange traded fund also serves as a proxy for maritime shipping profitability, but it is just a bundle of several publicly traded marine shipping companies shares.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "stocks: where can i find a list of bankrupt/diluting stocks in the us?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the only recommendation i have is to try the stock screener from google finance : https://www.google.com/finance?ei=ojz9venxd8oxmahr263ybg#stockscreener", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what determines a tax resident in florida", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i think the 60 days/year come from the irs tax residency determination, which isn't a florida law but applies to all the states. have a look at the \"substantial presence\" paragraph to see where the 60 days are coming from.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why would a restaurant offer a very large cash discount?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "why would such a large discount make business sense to the restaurant? the legit reasons could be; or can i assume that the restaurant is trying to avoid leaving a paper trail so that they could avoid paying tax? the illegal reasons could be;", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "do the activities of my llc need to be limited to a particular field?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no. when you file your articles of organization, simply state that your business will operate under the law. you don't need to give any further specification.", "role": "assistant" } ]