| [01:19] <white> asac: i was wondering about CVE-2008-4066 for icedove/iceape. Do we need something like https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=356697 backported? Just wondering, because i couldn't find the original bugnumber (448166) for CVE-2008-4066 (second part of MFSA 2008-43) in the series file | |
| [09:05] <asac> white: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=356697 | |
| [09:05] <asac> which bug number is that? | |
| [09:06] <asac> the patch looks familiar | |
| [09:24] <asac> white: ok found the bug number in your line ;) | |
| [09:25] <asac> white: yes, thats why stransky has asked for approval1.8.0.next.... e.g. it will be in next patchset unless we hit regressions | |
| [09:26] <asac> white: also mozilla bug 316859 (regression) and the original escape patch (so three for this one in total) | |
| [09:27] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 316859 in XPCOM "undefined symbol in components/libhtmlpars.so" [Critical,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316859 | |
| [09:28] <judu> hi | |
| [09:44] <iaindalton> fta: your Ubuntu 8.10 PPA's firefox-3.1 requires libasound2 1.0.18 but Ubuntu 8.10 only has 1.0.17; is this intentional? Should users of your PPA install 1.0.18 manually? | |
| === iaindalton is now known as iain|away | |
| [10:04] <asac> iain|away: you sure you are using intrepid lines for PPA? | |
| [10:05] <asac> if so, then fta probably added libasound2 to his archive ... which makes it hard to not pull it in | |
| [12:06] <fta2> iain|away, asac_: i didn't do anything special with libasound2, you may be using the wrong apt line | |
| [12:11] <asac_> yeah .... i assume so too | |
| [12:16] <ubuntizate> hi, can someone see me (hear me)? | |
| [12:16] <ubuntizate> there is someone there? | |
| [12:25] <asac_> sigh | |
| [12:25] <asac_> those folks that just quit | |
| [12:25] <asac_> i answered again for nothing in query | |
| [12:34] <asac_> oh PPA's are now signed ;) | |
| [12:36] <fta2> yep, i µblogged about that yesterday | |
| [12:37] <asac_> hmm ... probably too much traffic in my gwibber backlog ;) ... i didnt see that particular entry of yours | |
| [12:40] <fta2> i noticed because the lp guys used me as an example to explain the feature to users. so yesterday, my xchat was blinking like a Christmas tree | |
| [12:41] <fta2> asac_, http://identi.ca/fta | |
| [12:48] <asac_> nice ;) | |
| [13:01] <asac_> sigh sound is gone again | |
| [13:03] <asac_> hmm ... now everything is busted ... typing this from console now | |
| [13:03] <asac_> radeon ... missing symbol :/ | |
| [13:04] * asac_ runs update;upgrade in hope | |
| [13:04] <asac_> pulse 0.9.14 coming | |
| [13:04] <asac_> yay | |
| [13:05] <asac_> could this be what i want? | |
| [13:05] <asac_> i doubt this will cure radeon driver though | |
| [13:09] <asac_> hah ... X is back ;) | |
| [13:57] <hyperair> hi. i'm having issues trying to get a package to link with xulrunner-1.9-dev. it links fine with libxul-dev, but with xulrunner-1.9-dev (linking using flags from mozilla-gtkmozembed-embedding), ld throws a hissy fit about undefined references and whatnot. what should i do to get it to link? | |
| [13:57] <asac_> hyperair: yes. | |
| [13:57] <asac_> hyperair: if its standalone app use the standalone glue | |
| [13:58] <asac_> if its xpcom compnent or plugin use the dependent glue | |
| [13:58] <hyperair> asac_: yes i'm using the standalone glue. -lxpcom_glue or something | |
| [13:58] <hyperair> it uses gtkmozembed stuff | |
| [13:58] <asac_> standalone glue == libxul-embedding(-unstable) | |
| [13:58] <hyperair> and all the gtk_moz_embed_* functions are undefined | |
| [13:58] <asac_> dependent glue == libxul(-unstable) | |
| [13:58] <hyperair> asac_: tried with that, doesn't work eitehr | |
| [13:58] <hyperair> libxul-unstable won't link without -R | |
| [13:59] <hyperair> libxul-embedding-unstable won't link at all | |
| [13:59] <asac_> hyperair: use standalone glue ... you also need some code magic | |
| [13:59] <hyperair> asac_: what kind? | |
| [13:59] <asac_> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XPCOM_Glue | |
| [14:00] <asac_> let me check | |
| [14:00] <asac_> hyperair: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XulrunnerGecko | |
| [14:00] <asac_> its a bit outdated but should give you the basics | |
| [14:00] <asac_> hyperair: and gives example patches on how various other apps had to be fixed | |
| [14:01] <asac_> look at the yelp example for instance | |
| [14:01] <asac_> if you are using unstable headers use 1.9.0.* as max version (not 1.9.*) | |
| [14:02] <hyperair> yeah i'm using the unstable headers | |
| [14:02] <hyperair> i mean the package requires headers from unstable/ | |
| [14:02] <asac_> thats what i ment yes. | |
| [14:02] <asac_> 1.9.0.* is your maxversion then | |
| [14:03] <asac_> e.g. for GREVersionRange | |
| [14:03] <asac_> (or if yoiu link against 1.9.1 use 1.9.1b1 and 1.9.1.* as bounds | |
| [14:03] <hyperair> i see | |
| [14:04] <asac_> important is the glue initialization code as well as +#include <gtkmozembed_glue.cpp> | |
| [14:04] <asac_> the rest is more or less the same | |
| [14:04] <hyperair> where does gtkmozembed_glue.cpp come from? | |
| [14:04] <hyperair> it's also in /usr/include? | |
| [14:04] <asac_> yes | |
| [14:05] <hyperair> i see | |
| [14:05] <asac_> thats also in unstable i think .... as all gtkmozembed is unstable ;) | |
| [14:05] <hyperair> right | |
| [14:05] <hyperair> okay.. | |
| [14:05] <hyperair> i'll give it a go | |
| [14:05] <asac_> enjoy | |
| [14:06] <hyperair> meh. i've spent over 24 hours working on this package. the last thing i'd do is enjoy, lol | |
| [14:06] <asac_> heh ... success is in reach ;) | |
| [14:06] <asac_> and finally you found where to ask :-P | |
| [14:06] <asac_> thats a win | |
| [14:06] <hyperair> i sure hope so | |
| [14:06] <hyperair> heh yeah | |
| [14:07] <hyperair> some guys at #ubuntu-motu guided me | |
| [14:07] <hyperair> i found some blog posts by you, so if all else failed, i was going to start emailing and/or pinging you on IRC =p | |
| [14:07] <asac_> i know ... its just that you left so i couldnt answer there | |
| [14:07] <hyperair> ah i did? | |
| [14:08] <asac_> you left -motu channel ... yes :) | |
| [14:08] <hyperair> hmm when was that | |
| [14:08] <asac_> hyperair: not sure ... some time between you asking and me opening my screen this morning ;) | |
| [14:08] <asac_> could be 1 or 6 hours :) | |
| [14:08] <hyperair> i was having some connectivity issues. everytime i enter a certain lecture, my wireless goes haywire. almost as if somebody's aireplaying me off the net | |
| [14:08] <hyperair> must be during that time | |
| [14:09] <asac_> sure... no problem. i didnt complain ;) | |
| [14:09] <hyperair> i figured i was throwing up a lot of spurious disconnect/reconnect/nick collision messages, so i quit | |
| [14:09] <hyperair> =p | |
| [14:09] <asac_> heh. ok | |
| [14:09] <asac_> i dont see QUITS/JOINS | |
| [14:13] <hyperair> hmm | |
| [14:13] <hyperair> must be when i went to sleep then | |
| [14:13] <hyperair> but that's over 12 hours ago | |
| [14:13] <hyperair> maybe not | |
| [14:14] <hyperair> or maybe i was shifting location | |
| [14:14] <hyperair> anyway, what's the difference between xpcomglue and xpcomglue_s? | |
| [14:24] <asac_> hyperair: the xpcomglue includes the standalone pieces | |
| [14:25] <hyperair> asac_: what standalone pieces? | |
| [14:26] <asac_> hyperair: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/glue/standalone/ | |
| [14:28] <hyperair> what does gtkmozembed startup code look like minus the glue? | |
| [14:28] <hyperair> i can't seem to figure out where to put the XPCOMGlue startup stuff | |
| [14:29] <asac_> hyperair: do that before you do anything else with xpcom | |
| [14:30] <asac_> dont understand your question i guess | |
| [14:30] <asac_> hyperair: depends on how its done | |
| [14:30] <asac_> look for gtk_moz_embed_push_startup (); | |
| [14:30] <hyperair> i can't find it | |
| [14:30] <asac_> or gtk_moz_embed_set_comp_path (MOZILLA_HOME); | |
| [14:30] <hyperair> which is strange | |
| [14:30] <hyperair> also not there | |
| [14:30] <asac_> gtk_moz_embed_set_pat | |
| [14:31] <asac_> hyperair: maybe your app uses stuff like XRE_* ? | |
| [14:31] <asac_> XRE_InitEmbedding or something like that | |
| [14:32] <asac_> but that isnt good ... if you use gtk_moz_embed symbols you really should push/pop startup stuff ;) | |
| [14:32] <asac_> err | |
| [14:32] <hyperair> @_@ | |
| [14:33] <asac_> found it? | |
| [14:33] <hyperair> okay, a list of functions starting with gtk_moz_embed which are used... can_go_back, can_go_forward, get_js_status, get_link_message, get_location, go_back, go_forawrd, load_url, new, reload, set_chrome_mask, stop_load | |
| [14:34] <hyperair> all prefixed with gtk_moz_embed_ | |
| [14:34] <hyperair> are any of them relevant? | |
| [14:34] <asac_> hyperair: and XRE_ ? | |
| [14:34] <hyperair> none | |
| [14:34] <asac_> NS_Ini ? | |
| [14:35] <asac_> (as a substring) | |
| [14:35] <hyperair> NS_InitXPCOM2 (getter_AddRefs (sm), directory, nsnull); | |
| [14:35] <hyperair> would that be it? | |
| [14:35] <hyperair> no wait | |
| [14:35] <hyperair> shit | |
| [14:35] <hyperair> that's in gecko.m4 | |
| [14:36] <hyperair> how do gnome-panel applets get started? | |
| [14:36] <hyperair> i mean this looks like an ELF executable | |
| [14:36] <asac_> hyperair: gnome-panel applets get started by gnome-panel ;) | |
| [14:37] <hyperair> but i don't see a main() anywhere | |
| [14:37] <hyperair> uh gee, i think i know that much. more like what functions are there? | |
| [14:37] <asac_> its a bonobo activation thing i guess | |
| [14:37] <hyperair> =p | |
| [14:37] <hyperair> hmm | |
| [14:37] <asac_> hyperair: i think the NS_InitXPCOM thing is a good point to start | |
| [14:38] <asac_> and see in which function thats called | |
| [14:38] <hyperair> asac_: it's test code inside m4/gecko.m4 | |
| [14:39] <hyperair> hmm it seems everything begins from init_libs | |
| [14:39] <hyperair> void init_libs (int argc, char *argv[]) | |
| [14:40] <hyperair> i guess i'll just toss the xpcom init stuff there and hope it works | |
| [14:41] <asac_> hyperair: so you try to fix the testcode now? | |
| [14:41] <asac_> hyperair: look at epiphany or yelp gecko.m4 | |
| [14:41] <hyperair> eh? | |
| [14:41] <hyperair> test code? | |
| [14:41] <asac_> that might be a good start | |
| [14:41] <hyperair> no the test code doesn't really do much does it | |
| [14:41] <asac_> 5:38 < hyperair> asac_: it's test code inside m4/gecko.m4 | |
| [14:41] <hyperair> i mean it doesn't fail | |
| [14:41] <asac_> hmm | |
| [14:41] <asac_> probably doesnt run anthing then | |
| [14:42] <asac_> (pure luck) ;) | |
| [14:42] <hyperair> so if it clears ./configure, i don;'t really have to bother right =p | |
| [14:42] <hyperair> heh | |
| [14:42] <hyperair> well | |
| [14:42] <hyperair> i patched a few things | |
| [14:42] <hyperair> it was complaining about needing gtk2 | |
| [14:42] <hyperair> because some default toolkit macro thing was set to cairo-gtk2 | |
| [14:42] <asac_> hyperair: well. thts just installing a -dev package ;) | |
| [14:42] <hyperair> so i replaced strcmp with strstr | |
| [14:42] <asac_> ah | |
| [14:42] <asac_> dumb | |
| [14:42] <hyperair> yep | |
| [14:43] <asac_> hyperair: i would suggest to take a look at latest ephy or yelp gecko.m4 | |
| [14:43] <asac_> maybe you can even just copy that over | |
| [14:43] <asac_> might need a few adaptions in main configure.in i guess though ... but well | |
| [14:43] <hyperair> i'm packaging this thing, so i'd rather not end up with a humongous patch | |
| [14:43] <hyperair> =p | |
| [14:44] <asac_> hyperair: patch properly, and send upstream | |
| [14:44] <hyperair> hmm | |
| [14:44] <asac_> i mean sending them a "more" modern gecko.m4 shouldnt be that bad ;) | |
| [14:44] <hyperair> heh yeah i guess | |
| [14:44] <asac_> i saw many gecko.m4 and they are all a mess ;) | |
| [14:44] <hyperair> there hasn't been a release in years | |
| [14:44] <hyperair> i wonder if i should even bother continuing to package this =\ | |
| [14:44] <asac_> yeah. that means that the gecko.m4 probably comes from 2000 | |
| [14:44] <asac_> ;) | |
| [14:44] <asac_> or before | |
| [14:45] <hyperair> hmm | |
| [14:45] <hyperair> 2006 | |
| [14:45] <hyperair> probably | |
| [14:45] <asac_> how do you know;)? | |
| [14:45] <hyperair> http://www.kaskaras.net/vazaar/index.php <-- it says 2007 | |
| [14:45] <hyperair> no wait | |
| [14:45] <hyperair> 2006 | |
| [14:45] <hyperair> =p | |
| [14:45] <asac_> gecko.m4 gets copied around | |
| [14:45] <asac_> nobody knows where it originates form i think ;) | |
| [14:46] <asac_> maybe it was once in the mozilla tree ;) | |
| [14:46] <hyperair> heh | |
| [14:46] <hyperair> seriously? | |
| [14:46] <hyperair> why don't they ship it? | |
| [14:46] <hyperair> then aclocal can just add it | |
| [14:46] <asac_> nowadays there is pkg-config ;) | |
| [14:46] <hyperair> gecko.m4 still uses PKG_CHECK_MODULES | |
| [14:47] <asac_> yes. only reason why it exists is to provide backward compatibility i think | |
| [14:47] <hyperair> so it seems to be something built on top of pkg-config | |
| [14:47] <hyperair> ah damn | |
| [14:47] <hyperair> so i should just convince upstream to toss out his gecko.m4? | |
| [14:47] <hyperair> =p | |
| [14:47] <asac_> hyperair: i think evolution was : gecko.m4 -> manually; then later someone added stuff using pkg-config ... and so on | |
| [14:47] <asac_> and folks copied that around on the net | |
| [14:47] <hyperair> evolution uses xulrunner? | |
| [14:48] <hyperair> i wasn't aware | |
| [14:48] <asac_> no ... evolution like "how things became like they are at present" ;) | |
| [14:48] <asac_> darwin ;) | |
| [14:48] <hyperair> oh | |
| [14:48] <hyperair> heh | |
| [14:48] <hyperair> then it should be put into aclocal-archive or something | |
| [14:49] <asac_> yeah | |
| [14:49] <hyperair> i mean if it's so common and being copied around | |
| [14:49] <asac_> whatever | |
| [14:49] <asac_> its definitly a pain that its floating around | |
| [14:49] <hyperair> yeah | |
| [14:49] <hyperair> definitely | |
| [14:49] <hyperair> but what's more frustrating is why mozilla can't just use proper SONAMEs damnit | |
| [14:49] <hyperair> that would make linking so much easier | |
| [14:49] <hyperair> rather than using the stupid glue | |
| [14:49] <asac_> hyperair: previously nobody really used the glue ;) | |
| [14:50] <asac_> which caused the main issue | |
| [14:50] <hyperair> feels like an extremely cheap hack gone wrong | |
| [14:50] <asac_> now we enforce it. which is better ;) | |
| [14:50] <asac_> but painful | |
| [14:50] <hyperair> miserable | |
| [14:50] <asac_> (like -rpath is not working anymore) | |
| [14:50] <hyperair> there are still apps which link on libxul-dev | |
| [14:50] <asac_> its more cross-platform | |
| [14:50] <hyperair> particularly all the java gecko stuff | |
| [14:50] <asac_> so i agree to some degree with them ;) | |
| [14:51] <hyperair> i don't see gtk and gtkmm folks messing around with glues | |
| [14:51] <hyperair> i mean i don't know how they pull it off on windows, but at least they use proper SONAMEs on POSIX systems | |
| [14:53] <asac_> no clue. i think windows solution is to ship your own copy or do some registry rumbling ;) | |
| [14:54] <hyperair> fugly shit | |
| [14:54] <hyperair> X_X | |
| [14:54] <asac_> one thing that one has to accept is that xulrunner is not designed to be a lib, but a runtime ;) | |
| [14:54] <asac_> + and sdk | |
| [14:54] <asac_> if one looks from that perspective things become saner imo | |
| [14:55] <asac_> the fact that there is gtkmozembed is a different story | |
| [14:55] <asac_> and its degree of messyness is understood ... which is why there is work on a new, stable abi for embedding | |
| [14:55] <hyperair> oh there is? | |
| [14:55] <hyperair> awesome | |
| [14:55] <asac_> http://hg.mozilla.org/incubator/embedding/ | |
| [14:56] <asac_> hyperair: thats supposed to be shipped on top of xulrunner providing the stability required to solve all the issues in the world ;) | |
| [14:56] <hyperair> mm cool | |
| [14:56] <asac_> probably will take some time | |
| [14:57] <asac_> but definitly result of years of complains combined with webkit mania | |
| [14:58] <asac_> they even use libtool ;) | |
| [14:59] <asac_> so hopefully gtkmozembed will die soonish ;) | |
| [15:02] <hyperair> then a lot of programs will have to switch | |
| [15:02] <hyperair> and those that are abandoned... will have to be dropped out i suppose | |
| [15:05] <asac_> depends. if anyone is interested it will be ported i guess | |
| [15:05] <asac_> most apps shouldnt be that hard to port imo | |
| [15:28] <hyperair> hmm finished patching. let's see if it builds | |
| [15:30] <asac_> hehe | |
| [15:30] <asac_> dont give up ;) | |
| [15:30] <asac_> you are really close (i have the feeling) | |
| [15:32] <hyperair> hmm | |
| [15:32] <hyperair> okay, i'm having a whole series of compilation issues | |
| [15:32] <hyperair> mostly from gtkmozembed_glue.cpp | |
| [15:32] <hyperair> am i supposed to #include it or just compile it together? | |
| [15:33] <hyperair> asac_: ^ | |
| [15:33] <asac_> hyperair: just include it | |
| [15:34] <hyperair> asac_: only in one file or in multiple files? | |
| [15:34] <hyperair> i added it on top of all instances of #include <gtkmozembed.h> | |
| [15:35] <asac_> hyperair: thats ok | |
| [15:36] <asac_> hyperair: whats the problem? | |
| [15:36] <hyperair> In file included from blah blah blah /usr/include/xulrunner-bla/unstable/nscore.h:117:1: Warning: NS_HIDDEN redefined | |
| [15:36] <hyperair> wait those are warnings | |
| [15:37] <hyperair> error expected = , ; asm or __attribute__ before nsISupports | |
| [15:38] <hyperair> implicit declaration of GRE_GetGREPathwhatever. | |
| [15:38] <hyperair> hmmmmmmm | |
| [15:38] <asac_> hyperair: missing an include i guess | |
| [15:38] <hyperair> yeah | |
| [15:43] <hyperair> asac_: are there any needed includes before including gtkmozembed_glue.cpp? | |
| [15:46] <asac_> no. | |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | |
| [15:46] <asac> include nsXPCOMGlue.h | |
| [15:47] <asac> but thats included through glue.cpp implicitly iirc | |
| [15:51] <hyperair> aaaaaah i think i know what's wrong now | |
| [15:51] <hyperair> this is a C file | |
| [15:51] <asac> yeah ;) | |
| [15:51] <hyperair> not a C++ file | |
| [15:51] <asac> thats a good pit-fall ;) | |
| [15:51] <hyperair> meh | |
| [15:51] <asac> hyperair: the idea is to rename it | |
| [15:51] <hyperair> so can i still #include it? | |
| [15:52] <hyperair> uh rename what? | |
| [15:52] <hyperair> i mean i can't use C++ code inside a C file right | |
| [15:52] <asac> the c file to cpp ;) | |
| [15:52] * hyperair gapes | |
| [15:52] <hyperair> you can't be serious | |
| [15:52] <asac> hyperair: no. but you can use C++ for that individual file usually | |
| [15:53] <hyperair> renaming a file in a patch.... makes the patch twice the size of the original patch | |
| [15:53] <hyperair> of the original file* | |
| [15:53] <asac> you can also add a tiny .cpp file that only does the bootup | |
| [15:53] <hyperair> hmm | |
| [15:53] <hyperair> good idea | |
| [15:53] <asac> e.g. with function startup_standalone_glue | |
| [15:53] <asac> or something | |
| [15:53] <hyperair> what about the other .c files? | |
| [15:53] <asac> hyperair: you only need the _glue.cpp once | |
| [15:53] <asac> and only once | |
| [15:54] <hyperair> in only one of the files? | |
| [15:54] <asac> yes | |
| [15:57] <hyperair> i'll have to put extern "C" right? | |
| [16:01] <asac> yeah | |
| [16:01] <asac> #ifdef __cplusplus | |
| [16:01] <asac> extern "C" { | |
| [16:01] <asac> #endif /* __cplusplus */ | |
| [16:02] <asac> #ifdef __cplusplus | |
| [16:02] <asac> } | |
| [16:02] <asac> #endif /* __cplusplus */ | |
| [16:04] <asturubuntu> Hi, I need help | |
| [16:05] <asturubuntu> I'm a member of Ubuntu Asturian Translators, and I need help about Firefox | |
| [16:09] <asac> asturubuntu: are you the one whose email i answered a minute ago? | |
| [16:09] <asac> Marcos Alvarez ...? | |
| [16:10] <asturubuntu> no.... but I know Marcos Alvarez. | |
| [16:10] <asturubuntu> he's a member of Ubuntu Asturian Translators too. | |
| [16:10] <asac> asturubuntu: ah. i updated the bug and marked it as pet-bug (if its about the same issue) | |
| [16:10] <asac> bug 309312 | |
| [16:10] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 309312 in langpack-o-matic "make po2xpi aware of per-release whitelists (Was: Please update asturian translation)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/309312 | |
| [16:11] <asac> so will get fixed soon i guess | |
| [16:11] <asturubuntu> That's me https://launchpad.net/~malditoastur | |
| [16:11] <asturubuntu> and this is Marcos https://launchpad.net/~marcos.alvarez.costales | |
| [16:12] <asac> asturubuntu: did you test your translations yet? | |
| [16:12] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Testing_your_translation | |
| [16:13] <asturubuntu> thanks for the link | |
| [16:13] <asturubuntu> yes. | |
| [16:14] <asac> asturubuntu: you used it already? | |
| [16:14] <asturubuntu> We have tested it | |
| [16:14] <asac> with those instructions? nice | |
| [16:14] <asturubuntu> yes. | |
| [16:15] <asturubuntu> Wait a moment (I need to think in english, arf, arf.... I want to say many things but you are more quickly than me... :-$) | |
| [16:16] <asturubuntu> Actually, we have Firefox in Asturian language. To do that, we have to place some files into /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.5/chrome | |
| [16:16] <asac> asturubuntu: go ahead ... write down what you want to ask and so on ;) | |
| [16:16] <asac> i have to make a coffee anyway ;) | |
| [16:16] <asac> i will answer your questions if you number them when back ;) | |
| [16:17] <asturubuntu> ok | |
| [16:17] <asturubuntu> arf, arf... arf.. :P | |
| [16:18] <asturubuntu> long time ago, we did the translations in Launchpad. (Firefox and Xulrunner templates) | |
| [16:19] <asturubuntu> you can see it here: https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+lang/ast | |
| [16:20] <asturubuntu> When Intrepid was released, we thought that we can use Firefox in our language. But it was no possible. | |
| [16:22] <asturubuntu> Then, Marcos Alvarez, tried doing https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Testing_your_translation , we have get a .jar! files. | |
| [16:25] <asturubuntu> You can find it here: http://code.google.com/p/softasturubuntutranslations/ If you go to this site, and download the compressed file named intrepid_tornes_ast_Firefox_3.0.x_v.0.2.zip , you can see the files that we must put into /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.5/chrome and /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.5/chrome to get Firefox in Asturian language. | |
| [16:26] <asturubuntu> We are happy, but we have to do this routine everytime that Firefox updates | |
| [16:26] <asac> asturubuntu: right | |
| [16:27] <asturubuntu> The question is: | |
| [16:27] <asac> you also have to run the second script ... which is a .xpi | |
| [16:27] <asac> that can be installed by all users then | |
| [16:27] <asac> asturubuntu: see point 6. of the instructions | |
| [16:27] <asac> that produces a .xpi | |
| [16:29] <asturubuntu> I don't know how to do that. (I need to talk with Marcos)... wait a moment | |
| [16:31] <asac> no problem. i have a meeting now ... include my nick if your question and i will glance over to answer | |
| [16:33] <marcos_ast> hi | |
| [16:33] <asturubuntu> I'm talking with marcos right know (he's in his job) | |
| [16:33] <marcos_ast> Hi asturubuntu | |
| [16:33] <marcos_ast> Hi asac | |
| [16:34] <asturubuntu> and now is here! :D | |
| [16:34] <asturubuntu> hi marcos! | |
| [16:34] <marcos_ast> I writed asac 1/2 hour ago | |
| [16:34] <marcos_ast> :P | |
| [16:34] <asturubuntu> I don't understand very well what asac is telling me... | |
| [16:34] <marcos_ast> what's? | |
| [16:35] <asturubuntu> about the 6th point in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Testing_your_translation | |
| [16:35] <marcos_ast> i will go to red | |
| [16:35] <marcos_ast> read | |
| [16:36] <asac> marcos_ast: asturubuntu explained to me that you cop ythe jar! files to chrome/ ... with step 6 you should be able to produce proper .xpi's out of them | |
| [16:36] <asac> which would allow you to ship stuff from websites or anywhere | |
| [16:37] <marcos_ast> well, 2 persons work in this, I and Mikel | |
| [16:37] <marcos_ast> I learn create the xpi from US language | |
| [16:37] <marcos_ast> Do you need the step 6, asac? | |
| [16:38] <marcos_ast> do you like that I check it? | |
| [16:38] <marcos_ast> (Now i'm working, but in 4 hours, I can try it) | |
| [16:39] <hyperair> asac: IT BUILT OH MY GOD IT BUILT | |
| [16:39] * hyperair dances around the room | |
| [16:40] <hyperair> oh fsck it doesn't run | |
| [16:40] <asac> hehe | |
| [16:40] <asac> hyperair: now check that it doesnt crash | |
| [16:40] * hyperair deflates | |
| [16:40] <hyperair> it crashes | |
| [16:41] <hyperair> T_T what could be wrong | |
| [16:41] <asac> marcos_ast: step 6 is important as it does everything automatically for you | |
| [16:41] <asac> i dont need it to be tested | |
| [16:41] <asac> just wanted to point out that its easy for you to distribute the .xpi to asturians until its in officially | |
| [16:41] <marcos_ast> ok | |
| [16:41] <marcos_ast> ;) | |
| [16:42] <marcos_ast> then you're working in the update | |
| [16:42] <marcos_ast> I can see later | |
| [16:42] <marcos_ast> do you need something? :) | |
| [16:42] <marcos_ast> for it? | |
| [16:42] <marcos_ast> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309312 | |
| [16:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 309312 in langpack-o-matic "make po2xpi aware of per-release whitelists (Was: Please update asturian translation)" [Undecided,In progress] | |
| [16:56] <marcos_ast> ? | |
| [16:59] <marcos_ast> asac | |
| [16:59] <marcos_ast> we had a problem with the xpi in the past | |
| [16:59] <asac> hyperair: how does it crash? | |
| [16:59] <marcos_ast> because it's a bug in po2xpi | |
| [16:59] <marcos_ast> that not create fine locale/ast-ES/global/netError.dtd | |
| [16:59] <marcos_ast> but us xpi is fine | |
| [17:00] <asac> it doesnt? | |
| [17:00] <asac> marcos_ast: i think it does that | |
| [17:00] <asac> all other translations have that too afaik | |
| [17:00] <hyperair> asac: it's a little hard to debug because there's no main() function | |
| [17:00] <hyperair> don't ask me how it even got compiled into an ELF | |
| [17:01] <hyperair> asac: i'm trying to write a small program that loads the said function through dlopen | |
| [17:01] <hyperair> but it's not working very well | |
| [17:01] <marcos_ast> asac: I will check in the night | |
| [17:01] <marcos_ast> ;) | |
| [17:01] <marcos_ast> are you here? | |
| [17:01] <marcos_ast> will you here? | |
| [17:01] <marcos_ast> :P | |
| [17:01] <marcos_ast> will you be here? | |
| [17:02] <asac> yes | |
| [17:02] <marcos_ast> ;) ok | |
| [17:03] <asac> marcos_ast: i might not be here | |
| [17:03] <asac> but i will read and answer if you are here | |
| [17:04] <asac> if you go offline in between just ping me when you are back so i remember to send the answer | |
| [17:06] <marcos_ast> ok ;) | |
| [17:20] <white> asac: ok thanks, i'll add a note that it comes into the next patchset | |
| [17:21] <asac> sure | |
| [17:53] <white> asac: i guess we'll need the fix in the next icedove as well? :) | |
| [18:07] <white> asac: what about CVE-2008-5023 aka MFSA 2008-57? bugnumber 424733, attachement: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=343670 | |
| [18:13] <white> asac: also I believe CVE-2008-5510 aka MFSA 2008-67, bugnumber 228856, attachement: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=345028 needs to go into the next patchround, right? | |
| [18:19] <white> asac: and can you confirm that https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=256470 is the complete patch for bugnumber 367428? | |
| [18:24] <hyperair> asac: ping | |
| [18:25] <hyperair> http://pastebin.com/f5c27793e <-- for some reason, the segfault happens right at the end of the function, after gtk_moz_embed_set_path (xpcomLocation); | |
| [18:25] <white> asac: i am also unsure about CVE-2008-5019 aka MFSA 2008-53 regarding xulrunner | |
| [18:25] <white> asac: we are approaching the end :) | |
| [18:27] <white> asac: do we need a fix for CVE-2008-5504 aka MFSA 2008-62, bugnumber 453526 for xulrunner? | |
| [18:30] <white> asac: i'll put this in an email, might be easier | |
| [18:36] <white> asac: mail sent :) | |
| [18:40] <[reed]> white: what distro are you representing? Debian? | |
| [18:41] <hyperair> asac: okay, it seems i can't call gtk_moz_embed_set_path at all without segfaulting | |
| [18:43] <white> [reed]: debian, yes | |
| [18:44] <[reed]> k | |
| [18:44] <white> [reed]: in this case debian stable (etch) | |
| [18:45] <[reed]> cool | |
| [19:25] <hyperair> asac: solved the issue. it builds and runs fine now =D | |
| [19:28] <hyperair> asac: thanks for the help, and could you revu this for me please? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=vazaar :D | |
| [19:50] * Nafallo haz a question | |
| [19:51] <Nafallo> in the menu it says "Firefox Web Browser", but "Mozilla Thunderbird Mail/News". | |
| [19:51] <Nafallo> inconsistent... | |
| [19:51] <Nafallo> asac, fta: ^^ | |
| [21:42] <marcos_ast> hi | |