UbuntuIRC / 2009 /06 /13 /#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt
niansa
Initial commit
4aa5fce
[00:01] <micahg> asac: just noticed a FF3.5 Series on the 3.0 page
[00:01] <micahg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0
[00:01] <micahg> for jaunty
[00:05] <asac> micahg: oh, btw today there is a security release going out, which means that we should pay extra attention to new bugs
[00:05] <asac> micahg: for folks reporting regressions
[00:05] <asac> so if there is something that sounds suspicious and you see it ping me asap ;)
[00:05] <asac> even if its nothing ;)
[00:06] <micahg> ok
[00:06] <micahg> I'll be on Sat night
[00:06] <asac> firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9 are the packages
[00:07] * micahg is going home
[00:56] <asac> fta: tarball is broken in ppa?
[00:56] <asac> tar -C build-tree -x -j -f mozilla-central-1.9.2~a1~hg20090611r29077-source.tar.bz2
[00:56] <asac> bzip2: I/O or other error, bailing out. Possible reason follows.
[00:56] <asac> bzip2: Broken pipe Input file = (stdin), output file = (stdout)
[00:56] <asac> tar: Child returned status 1
[00:56] <asac> tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
[00:56] <asac> make: *** [debian/stamp-mozilla-central-1.9.2~a1~hg20090611r29077-source.tar.bz2] Error 2
[00:57] <fta> got that already, it was bd
[00:57] <fta> not the tarball
[00:57] <fta> try manually, it's fine
[00:57] <asac> sigh
[00:57] <asac> fta: how do you produce the tarball?
[00:57] <fta> tar jcvf
[00:58] <asac> i think its the orig that is broken (for bd)
[00:58] <asac> i dont think that bd has any business in the inner tarball
[00:59] <fta> you can unpack it completely manually, so something's broken inside bd, it's neither the file, nor tar, nor gzip, nor bzip2
[00:59] <asac> ouch
[00:59] <asac> it really is the inner tarball that is broken when you run it in bd?
[00:59] <asac> whats that?
[00:59] <fta> if you dpkg-buildpackage, it's fine, if you bzr bd --merge, it's not
[00:59] <asac> i went into the failed tree and ran debuild -b
[00:59] <asac> and it worked
[01:00] <asac> yes, but how does bd kill the inner cdbs tar
[01:00] <fta> yep, that's what i said
[01:00] <fta> maybe it preloads something
[01:00] <fta> no idea
[01:00] <asac> so current tarball failed?
[01:00] <asac> patches do not apply for me there
[01:00] <fta> i fixed that hours ago
[01:01] <asac> yes, but i used the tarball in current ppa?
[01:01] <asac> or did you upload after that?
[01:01] <fta> i kept the same tarball, just fixed the patch
[01:01] <fta> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[01:02] <fta> ppas are broken right now, unable to publish files
[01:02] <asac> yeah . so i probably worked against tarball from yesterday
[01:02] <asac> nevermind
[01:02] <asac> i tried what i wante to test now manually ;)(
[01:03] <asac> e.g. that the patch is non garbage for mozilla bug 473629
[01:03] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 473629 in jemalloc "crash on exit in glibc memalign with jemalloc statically linked" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473629
[01:06] <fta> indeed, it's still valid in today's build of trunk
[01:08] <asac_> 02:03 < ubottu> Mozilla bug 473629 in jemalloc "crash on exit in glibc memalign with jemalloc statically linked" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473629
[01:08] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 473629 in jemalloc "crash on exit in glibc memalign with jemalloc statically linked" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473629
[01:08] <asac_> 02:04 -!- micahg [[email protected]] has quit ["Leaving."]
[01:08] <asac_> 02:04 -!- stevel [[email protected]] has quit []
[01:08] <asac_> 02:06 < asac> fta: btw, the build system is now in hardy :)
[01:08] <asac_> 02:06 < asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/1.9.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1
[01:08] <asac_> 02:06 < asac> rather https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/xulrunner-1.9/1.9.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1
[01:08] <asac_> 02:07 < asac> so cross your fingers ;)
[01:08] <asac_> 02:07 < asac> !info xulrunner-1.9
[01:08] <fta> ?
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[01:23] <asac> fta: i pasted what i wrote before i noticed that i was offline
[01:23] <fta> * micahg has quit ("Leaving.")
[01:23] <fta> * stevel has quit ()
[01:23] <fta> <fta> indeed, it's still valid in today's build of trunk
[01:23] <fta> * asac_ ([email protected]) has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
[01:24] <fta> and thanks
[01:25] <fta> Jun 10 20:54:54 <fta> asac, fennec requires xul trunk now, and the build-system is incomplete.. lacks l10n
[01:37] <asac> fta: yeah. so fennec gave up on making a release any time soon?
[01:39] <fta> i discussed with mfinkle about that, he said it's probably fixable for 191, but no one did it so far (months)
[01:39] <asac> fta: also i am not sure i understand the context. if fennec needs trunk then we dont need to update the hardy xulrunner at least ;) as we will need the build from somewhere else anyway
[01:39] <asac> fta: ok thanks.
[01:40] <fta> xul in hardy fine as it is. fennec needs some l10n mk files, only in trunk, but that's a different story
[11:28] <asac> ola ... today i am on a trip, so cu in the evening!
[13:07] <fta> ripps, i see your daily ppa is all green now. Good. Were you able to do everything you wanted?
[13:21] <alexbodn> fta: i'm on debian, but i found my way with launch-pad files
[13:22] <alexbodn> fta, acas: how did you find my bluegriffon packaging script?
=== ejat is now known as e-jat
[14:57] <BUGabundo> boas tardes
[15:07] <ripps> fta: I think I've got most things going okay, I'm still running to speed bumps with another set of packages, First, they seem to ignore the $ver~git$release, and trying to manually intiate an update is working.
[15:07] <ripps> *isn't
[18:03] <BUGabundo> fta: where do I file bugs on chromium?!?
[18:29] <fta> BUGabundo, upstream
[18:29] <BUGabundo> code.g.c/p/c?
[18:30] <BUGabundo> I want my ctrl+enter
[18:30] <fta> alexbodn, sorry, i'm no longer interested. I stopped reading your 1st diff where you claimed to be original packager. so, thanks for your work but no thanks. period.
[18:30] <fta> BUGabundo, follow the wiki page
[18:30] <fta> BUGabundo, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Chromium/Debug
[18:30] <fta> there's a link in the 1st part
[18:31] <BUGabundo> fta: thanks
[18:33] <fta> BUGabundo, it's just the regular link + a template for linux
[18:35] <fta> Sorry, the program "firefox-3.6" closed unexpectedly
[18:35] <fta> Your computer does not have enough free memory to automatically analyze the problem and send a report to the developers.
[18:35] <fta> d'oh!
[18:36] <BUGabundo> LOL
[18:37] <BUGabundo> fta: my FF 36 is acting up. after an hour so or so start to churm on CPU
[18:37] <BUGabundo> restarting it fixes it for another hour
[18:37] <Nafallo> lol
[18:37] <BUGabundo> not much opened
[18:48] <fta> my crash was from firebug
[18:49] <BUGabundo> LOL
[18:49] <BUGabundo> does it run on 3.5 now
[18:56] <fta> i'm using it with 3.6
[19:00] <BUGabundo> okk
[19:11] <fta> asac, grrr.. bzr add :)
[19:12] <fta> asac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27874687/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20090613r29194%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~intrepid_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[19:12] <fta> well, bzr mv
[19:12] <BUGabundo> fta: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=14043
[19:13] <BUGabundo> hey asac
[19:13] <BUGabundo> asac: not using debian cloack ?
[19:13] <BUGabundo> s/debian/ubuntu/
=== ejat is now known as e-jat
[21:01] <fta> lol http://www.ijg.org/
[21:13] <BUGabundo> fta: isn't jpeg patent closed?
[21:15] <BUGabundo> fta: http://www.getdropbox.com/gallery/921561/1/Screen?h=6a6906
[21:15] <BUGabundo> google chrome on mac is color managed
[21:15] <BUGabundo> on linux it isn't
[21:17] <fta> well, i guess it will come soon
[21:27] <BUGabundo> fta: http://www.color.org/version4html.xalter
[21:29] <fta> yep
[22:46] <asac> hmm. is pulse currently completely broken?
[22:46] <BUGabundo> nope
[22:46] <BUGabundo> working here
[22:46] <BUGabundo> but another user reported probs on +1
[22:47] <asac> well. i cannot even start pavucontrol :) ... no connnection possible
[22:47] <asac> odd
[22:48] <BUGabundo> that happens a lot
[22:48] <BUGabundo> PA died
[22:48] <BUGabundo> or something is blocking it
[22:48] <asac> well. PA is running here in my terminal
[22:48] <asac> but nothing can connect to pa
[22:48] <asac> no gnome-sound-properties testsound
[22:48] <Nafallo> I can see asav
[22:48] <Nafallo> FAIL
[22:48] <Nafallo> s/v$/c/
[22:49] <asac> Nafallo: huh?
[22:50] <Nafallo> hi
[22:50] <Nafallo> asac: you can haz njew gajim nau!
[22:51] <asac> +++-==========================-==========================-====================================================================
[22:51] <asac> ii gajim 0.12.3-0ubuntu1 Jabber client written in PyGTK
[22:51] * BUGabundo starts decoder
[22:51] <asac> that one?
[22:51] <Nafallo> \o/
[22:51] * asac reboots to see if pulse was one time bustage
[22:51] <BUGabundo> !info gajim
[22:51] <ubottu> gajim (source: gajim): Jabber client written in PyGTK. In component universe, is optional. Version 0.12.1-0ubuntu5 (jaunty), package size 5248 kB, installed size 17952 kB
[22:52] <Nafallo> !info gajim karmic
[22:52] <ubottu> gajim (source: gajim): Jabber client written in PyGTK. In component universe, is optional. Version 0.12.3-0ubuntu1 (karmic), package size 5399 kB, installed size 18560 kB
[22:52] <BUGabundo> asac: don't
[22:52] <BUGabundo> you may not return!
[22:52] <BUGabundo> asac: changes to grub / grub2
[22:55] <asac> well returning was easy. sound still broken
[22:56] * BUGabundo waves guud bye
[23:16] <alexbodn> asac, fta. i've seen you called me but pidgin crashed before it showed your text. sorry
[23:18] <yoasif> hey guys... any chance someone could take a look at this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/359868/+addcomment
[23:18] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 359868 in linux "[Acer, inc. Aspire 4530] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[23:31] <fta> asac, working on the libjpeg thing we discussed earlier
[23:32] <fta> asac, it's painful
[23:33] <fta> asac, mozilla sources are crippled with stuff from nspr (include, types, macros)
[23:53] <fta> ok, it builds now, but it fails on make test