<jupyter_start><jupyter_text>In this modul we compare the various initialization strategies for K-means in terms of runtime and quality of the results First step is to Load the dataset Start by loading the digits dataset. This dataset contains handwritten digits from 0 to 9. In the context of clustering, one would like to group images such that the handwritten digits on the image are the same<jupyter_code>import numpy as np
from sklearn.datasets import load_digits

data, labels = load_digits(return_X_y=True)
(n_samples, n_features), n_digits = data.shape, np.unique(labels).size

print(f"# digits: {n_digits}; # samples: {n_samples}; # features {n_features}")<jupyter_output># digits: 10; # samples: 1797; # features 64<jupyter_text>Define our evaluation benchmark During this benchmark, we intend to compare different initialization methods for KMeans<jupyter_code>from time import time
from sklearn import metrics
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler


def bench_k_means(kmeans, name, data, labels):
    """Benchmark to evaluate the KMeans initialization methods.

    Parameters
    ----------
    kmeans : KMeans instance
        A :class:`~sklearn.cluster.KMeans` instance with the initialization
        already set.
    name : str
        Name given to the strategy. It will be used to show the results in a
        table.
    data : ndarray of shape (n_samples, n_features)
        The data to cluster.
    labels : ndarray of shape (n_samples,)
        The labels used to compute the clustering metrics which requires some
        supervision.
    """
    t0 = time()
    estimator = make_pipeline(StandardScaler(), kmeans).fit(data)
    fit_time = time() - t0
    results = [name, fit_time, estimator[-1].inertia_]

    # Define the metrics which require only the true labels and estimator
    # labels
    clustering_metrics = [
        metrics.homogeneity_score,
        metrics.completeness_score,
        metrics.v_measure_score,
        metrics.adjusted_rand_score,
        metrics.adjusted_mutual_info_score,
    ]
    results += [m(labels, estimator[-1].labels_) for m in clustering_metrics]

    # The silhouette score requires the full dataset
    results += [
        metrics.silhouette_score(
            data,
            estimator[-1].labels_,
            metric="euclidean",
            sample_size=300,
        )
    ]

    # Show the results
    formatter_result = (
        "{:9s}\t{:.3f}s\t{:.0f}\t{:.3f}\t{:.3f}\t{:.3f}\t{:.3f}\t{:.3f}\t{:.3f}"
    )
    print(formatter_result.format(*results))<jupyter_output><empty_output><jupyter_text>Run the benchmark<jupyter_code>from sklearn.cluster import KMeans
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA

print(82 * "_")
print("init\t\ttime\tinertia\thomo\tcompl\tv-meas\tARI\tAMI\tsilhouette")

kmeans = KMeans(init="k-means++", n_clusters=n_digits, n_init=4, random_state=0)
bench_k_means(kmeans=kmeans, name="k-means++", data=data, labels=labels)

kmeans = KMeans(init="random", n_clusters=n_digits, n_init=4, random_state=0)
bench_k_means(kmeans=kmeans, name="random", data=data, labels=labels)

pca = PCA(n_components=n_digits).fit(data)
kmeans = KMeans(init=pca.components_, n_clusters=n_digits, n_init=1)
bench_k_means(kmeans=kmeans, name="PCA-based", data=data, labels=labels)

print(82 * "_")<jupyter_output>__________________________________________________________________________________
init		time	inertia	homo	compl	v-meas	ARI	AMI	silhouette
k-means++	0.302s	69662	0.680	0.719	0.699	0.570	0.695	0.189
random   	0.361s	69707	0.675	0.716	0.694	0.560	0.691	0.174
PCA-based	0.267s	72686	0.636	0.658	0.647	0.521	0.643	0.143
__________________________________________________________________________________<jupyter_text>Visualize the results on PCA-reduced data PCA allows to project the data from the original 64-dimensional space into a lower dimensional space<jupyter_code>import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

reduced_data = PCA(n_components=2).fit_transform(data)
kmeans = KMeans(init="k-means++", n_clusters=n_digits, n_init=4)
kmeans.fit(reduced_data)

# Step size of the mesh. Decrease to increase the quality of the VQ.
h = 0.02  # point in the mesh [x_min, x_max]x[y_min, y_max].

# Plot the decision boundary. For that, we will assign a color to each
x_min, x_max = reduced_data[:, 0].min() - 1, reduced_data[:, 0].max() + 1
y_min, y_max = reduced_data[:, 1].min() - 1, reduced_data[:, 1].max() + 1
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.arange(x_min, x_max, h), np.arange(y_min, y_max, h))

# Obtain labels for each point in mesh. Use last trained model.
Z = kmeans.predict(np.c_[xx.ravel(), yy.ravel()])

# Put the result into a color plot
Z = Z.reshape(xx.shape)
plt.figure(1)
plt.clf()
plt.imshow(
    Z,
    interpolation="nearest",
    extent=(xx.min(), xx.max(), yy.min(), yy.max()),
    cmap=plt.cm.Paired,
    aspect="auto",
    origin="lower",
)

plt.plot(reduced_data[:, 0], reduced_data[:, 1], "k.", markersize=2)
# Plot the centroids as a white X
centroids = kmeans.cluster_centers_
plt.scatter(
    centroids[:, 0],
    centroids[:, 1],
    marker="x",
    s=169,
    linewidths=3,
    color="w",
    zorder=10,
)
plt.title(
    "K-means clustering on the digits dataset (PCA-reduced data)\n"
    "Centroids are marked with white cross"
)
plt.xlim(x_min, x_max)
plt.ylim(y_min, y_max)
plt.xticks(())
plt.yticks(())
plt.show()<jupyter_output><empty_output>
{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.11596887736198593, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03001111522786217, 'mean_word_length': 4.117535545023697, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 15, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 15, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
{'chain_length': '4', 'dir': 'jupyter-structured-clean-dedup', 'id': '161095', 'license': 'Unlicense', 'n_tokens_mistral': 2001, 'n_tokens_neox': 1839, 'n_words': 497, 'path': 'Week 6/K-Means clustering on the handwritten digits data.ipynb', 'repo_name': 'Hanif-2610/Machine-Learning-Homework-Project', 'size': '5398'}