<commit_before>= Rake 10.0 Released

  "Jim, when will Rake reach version 1.0?"

Over the past several years I've been asked that question at
conferences, panels and over twitter. Due to historical reasons (or
maybe just plain laziness) Rake has been treating the second digit of
the version as the major release number. So in my head Rake was
already at version 9.<commit_msg>tweek wording in release notes.<commit_after>= Rake 10.0 Released

  "Jim, when will Rake reach version 1.0?"

Over the past several years I've been asked that question at
conferences, panels and over twitter. Due to historical reasons (or
maybe just plain laziness) Rake has (incorrectly) been treating the
second digit of the version as the major release number. So in my head
Rake was already at version 9.
{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.047073791348600506, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015267175572519083, 'mean_word_length': 4.427586206896552, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 3, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
{'dir': 'git-commits-cleaned', 'id': '2250858', 'n_tokens_mistral': 225, 'n_tokens_neox': 206, 'n_words': 126}