<commit_before><commit_msg>Started on Parallel visual testing article<commit_after>{
  "title": "Parallel visual testing",
  "author": "<NAME>",
  "date": "2017-01-29T17:57:49-0600",
  "keywords": "visual, testing, perceptual, parallel",
  "summary": "Comparison of parallelization techniques for visual testing"
}

In my latest project, I've been using visual tests from the beginning. The upfront investment is low cost time-wise with a potentially costly expensive maintenance for site-wide changes (e.g. altering navigation/layout).

As a solo developer, the trade-off is largely worth it -- I get the
{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.1024793388429752, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02975206611570248, 'mean_word_length': 5.183673469387755, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 5, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 4, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
{'dir': 'git-commits-cleaned', 'id': '1193607', 'n_tokens_mistral': 177, 'n_tokens_neox': 160, 'n_words': 71}