<commit_before>---
title: "Austerity From the Left: Social Democratic Parties in the Shadow of the Great Recession"
collection: projects
permalink: /projects/austerity_left
---

------

Austerity became the predominant fiscal policy response to the Great Recession in Europe. After a brief period of "emergency Keynesianism" from 2008 to 2010, even the center-left abandoned plans for deficit-spending and accepted austerity as the dogma of the day. Why did social democratic parties not promote alternative economic policies? In my PhD research, I examined the elite and popular politics of austerity to explain this. My book, which is forthcoming with Oxford University Press builds on this research. It combines qualitative and quantitative methods and draws on a wide range of empirical evidence to study both the demand- and supply-side of politics. It uses evidence from quantitative content analysis, opinion polls, survey experiments as well as insights from over forty elite interviews with leading social democratic politicians and policymakers.

Based on this evidence, the book shows that a complex interaction of *electoral* and *ideational* pressures pushed social democratic parties towards orthodox fiscal policies, as they were trapped by the legacy of their pre-crisis policies. In their search for fiscal credibility, social democrats responded to public opinion and the dominant discourse that viewed government deficits as taboo. This was reinforced by powerful mechanisms of path dependency and institutional stickiness: In the wake of the Third Way, many social democrats bought into a structural explanation of the crisis and did not believe that demand management would help Europe to recover. However, as the costs of austerity policies increased over time, the inability of social democratic parties to rally against these policies diluted their party brand, demobilized their supporters, and contributed to their current electoral crisis. Consequently, the book does not only help to understand why austerity became the dominant response to the Great Recession, but it also provides a new perspective on the current electoral crisis of the center-left. It shows that social democratic parties are not just victims of large, structural changes (e.g., de-industrialization or educational expansion) but also agents of their own fate.

*Related publications:*

* *Austerity From the Left: Social Democratic Parties in the Shadow of the Great Recession*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming (2023).
* "Social democracy." In <NAME>, <NAME>, <NAME>, and <NAME> (eds.), *Routledge Handbook of Political Parties*. London: Routledge, forthcoming (2023).
* "[The ideational foundations of social democratic austerity in the context of the Great Recession](https://academic.oup.com/ser/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ser/mwz001/5320344)" (with [<NAME>](https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/people/mcdaniel/)). *Socio-Economic Review*, 18(2):439-463, 2020.<br/>
[Pre-print version]({{ site.url }}/files/publications/BremerMcDaniel_SER_Preprint.pdf)
* "[The political economy of the SPD reconsidered: Evidence from the Great Recession](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09644008.2018.1555817?journalCode=fgrp20)". *German Politics*, 29(3):441-463, 2020.<br/>
[Pre-print version]({{ site.url }}/files/publications/Bremer_GermanPolitics_Preprint.pdf)
* "[The missing left? Economic crisis and the programmatic response of social democratic parties in Europe](http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354068817740745)". *Party Politics*, 24(1):23-38, 2018.<br/>
[Pre-print version]({{ site.url }}/files/publications/Bremer_PartyPolitics_Preprint.pdf) / [online appendix]({{ site.url }}/files/publications/Bremer_PartyPolitics_OnlineAppendix.pdf) / [replication material](https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/LBO6KC)<commit_msg>Update 1_austerity_left.md<commit_after>---
title: "Austerity From the Left: Social Democratic Parties in the Shadow of the Great Recession"
collection: projects
permalink: /projects/austerity_left
---

------

Austerity became the predominant fiscal policy response to the Great Recession in Europe. After a brief period of "emergency Keynesianism" from 2008 to 2010, even the center-left abandoned plans for deficit-spending and accepted austerity as the dogma of the day. Why did social democratic parties not promote alternative economic policies? In my PhD research, I examined the elite and popular politics of austerity to explain this. My book, which is forthcoming with Oxford University Press, builds on this research. It combines qualitative and quantitative methods and draws on a wide range of empirical evidence to study both the demand- and supply-side of politics. It uses evidence from quantitative content analysis, opinion polls, survey experiments as well as insights from over forty elite interviews with leading social democratic politicians and policymakers.

Based on this evidence, the book shows that a complex interaction of *electoral* and *ideational* pressures pushed social democratic parties towards orthodox fiscal policies, as they were trapped by the legacy of their pre-crisis policies. In their search for fiscal credibility, social democrats responded to public opinion and the dominant discourse that viewed government deficits as taboo. This was reinforced by powerful mechanisms of path dependency and institutional stickiness: In the wake of the Third Way, many social democrats bought into a structural explanation of the crisis and did not believe that demand management would help Europe to recover. However, as the costs of austerity policies increased over time, the inability of social democratic parties to rally against these policies diluted their party brand, demobilized their supporters, and contributed to their current electoral crisis. Consequently, the book does not only help to understand why austerity became the dominant response to the Great Recession, but it also provides a new perspective on the current electoral crisis of the center-left. It shows that social democratic parties are not just victims of large, structural changes (e.g., de-industrialization or educational expansion) but also agents of their own fate.

*Related publications:*

* *Austerity From the Left: Social Democratic Parties in the Shadow of the Great Recession*. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming (2023).
* "Social democracy." In <NAME>, <NAME>, <NAME>, and <NAME> (eds.), *Routledge Handbook of Political Parties*. London: Routledge, forthcoming (2023).
* "[The ideational foundations of social democratic austerity in the context of the Great Recession](https://academic.oup.com/ser/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ser/mwz001/5320344)" (with [Sean McDaniel](https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/people/mcdaniel/)). *Socio-Economic Review*, 18(2):439-463, 2020.<br/>
[Preprint version]({{ site.url }}/files/publications/BremerMcDaniel_SER_Preprint.pdf)
* "[The political economy of the SPD reconsidered: Evidence from the Great Recession](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09644008.2018.1555817?journalCode=fgrp20)". *German Politics*, 29(3):441-463, 2020.<br/>
[Preprint version]({{ site.url }}/files/publications/Bremer_GermanPolitics_Preprint.pdf)
* "[The missing left? Economic crisis and the programmatic response of social democratic parties in Europe](http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354068817740745)". *Party Politics*, 24(1):23-38, 2018.<br/>
[Preprint version]({{ site.url }}/files/publications/Bremer_PartyPolitics_Preprint.pdf) / [online appendix]({{ site.url }}/files/publications/Bremer_PartyPolitics_OnlineAppendix.pdf) / [replication material](https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/LBO6KC)
{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.07785732549220148, 'fraction_numerical': 0.032088979800562516, 'mean_word_length': 5.492116182572614, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 18, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 18, 'https://': 8, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 2, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
{'dir': 'git-commits-cleaned', 'id': '5911103', 'n_tokens_mistral': 2215, 'n_tokens_neox': 1891, 'n_words': 915}