agentlans's picture
Upload folder using huggingface_hub
c7f56f8 verified
|
raw
history blame
7.55 kB
---
configs:
- config_name: DDC
default: true
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- DDC.jsonl.gz
- config_name: LCC
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- LCC.jsonl.gz
- config_name: UDC
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- UDC.jsonl.gz
- config_name: CLC
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- CLC.jsonl.gz
- config_name: RVK
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- RVK.jsonl.gz
task_categories:
- text-classification
task_ids:
- multi-class-classification
pretty_name: Library Classification Systems
tags:
- library-science
- information-organization
- ontology
---
# Library Classification Systems
## Dataset Summary
This comprehensive dataset encompasses hierarchical outlines of five major library classification systems:
1. Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC)
2. Library of Congress Classification (LCC)
3. Universal Decimal Classification (UDC)
4. Chinese Library Classification (CLC)
5. Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK)
The dataset provides freely-available outlines of these classification systems, which are widely used in libraries and information management systems worldwide. It captures the hierarchical structure and descriptions for each classification, offering a valuable resource for researchers, librarians, and information scientists. However, it's important to note that the full text of the first three classification systems is not included and must be purchased separately from their organizations.
### Data Format and Content
The data is structured in JSONL (JSON Lines) format, with each entry containing fields for:
- Call numbers
- Descriptions
- Broader categories
- Narrower subcategories
This format ensures easy parsing and integration into various data processing workflows.
### Classification Systems Overview
- **DDC, LCC, and UDC**: These are internationally recognized systems used in libraries across the globe.
- **CLC**: Primarily used in China by public schools, libraries, and publishers.
- **RVK**: Employed by several German universities for organizing their collections.
## Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
This dataset is particularly valuable for a range of tasks in information science and machine learning, including:
1. Hierarchical Text Classification
2. Library Science and Information Organization
3. Ontology and Knowledge Graph Construction
4. Comparative Studies of Classification Systems
5. Machine Learning for Library Cataloging
While there are no specific leaderboards associated with this dataset, it presents opportunities for developing benchmarks in areas such as automated classification accuracy or ontology mapping.
## Languages
The dataset incorporates multiple languages, reflecting the global nature of library classification systems:
- English: DDC, LCC, and UDC
- Simplified Chinese: CLC
- German: RVK
This multilingual aspect enhances the dataset's utility for cross-lingual information retrieval and classification tasks.
## Data Structure
### Data Instances
Each instance in the dataset represents a library classification entry. The structure is designed to capture the hierarchical nature of the classification scheme.
### Data Fields
- `call_number`: string
- The alphanumeric call number that uniquely identifies the classification
- Example: `"AC1-999"`
- `description`: string
- A textual description of the classification topic or subject area
- Example: `"Collections. Series. Collected works"`
- `broader`: string or null
- The call number of the parent/broader classification
- Null for root-level classifications
- Example: `null` (for a top-level classification)
- `narrower`: list of strings
- An array of call numbers representing child/narrower classifications
- Example: `["AC1-195", "AC200", "AC801-895", "AC901-995", "AC999"]`
### Example Instance
```json
{
"call_number": "AC1-999",
"description": "Collections. Series. Collected works",
"broader": null,
"narrower": ["AC1-195", "AC200", "AC801-895", "AC901-995", "AC999"]
}
```
This structure allows for efficient navigation and querying of the classification hierarchy, enabling users to traverse from broader to narrower topics and vice versa.
### Data Splits
The full dataset contains:
- 1,110 DDC entries
- 6,517 LCC entries
- 2,431 UDC entries
- 8,826 CLC entries
- 5,032 RVK entries
Total: 23,916 entries
## Dataset Creation
### Curation Rationale
This dataset was curated to provide open access to the hierarchical structure of major library classification systems. It aims to support research, education, and innovation in information organization and retrieval.
### Source Data
The dataset is derived from the publicly available outlines of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). Full classification texts are proprietary and require purchase from the respective organizations.
#### Initial Data Collection and Normalization
Classification outlines were collected on 2024-09-18 from the following authoritative sources:
- Library of Congress Classification (LCC): Library of Congress Classification Outline
- Universal Decimal Classification (UDC): Universal Decimal Classification Summary (ROSSIO Vocabulary Server)
- Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC): Dewey Services - Resources (OCLC)
- Chinese Library Classification (CLC): CLC Index
- Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK): RVK Online
Versions used:
- UDC Master Reference File (UDC MRF) 2011
- DDC 23 Summaries
- RVK aktuelle csv-Datei (2023_2)
Data processing steps:
1. DDC: The summary PDF was downloaded and manually formatted for consistency.
2. LCC: Microsoft Word files were converted to plain text, with headings and call numbers extracted programmatically.
3. UDC: The `udc-summary.rdf` file was parsed using RDFlib, retaining only English labels.
4. CLC: The data was collected by crawling through the website. Only the first 3 levels of the hierarchy were included.
5. RVK: The CSV file was processed, keeping only the first 3 levels of the hierarchy.
## Considerations for Using the Data
### Social Impact of Dataset
This dataset expands access to library classification knowledge, potentially:
- Facilitating research in information science and digital humanities
- Supporting the development of improved information retrieval systems
- Enhancing educational resources for library and information science students
### Discussion of Biases
Users should be aware that library classification systems may reflect historical, cultural, and geographical biases in knowledge organization. These biases could manifest as:
- Overrepresentation of Western perspectives
- Outdated terminology or categorizations for certain topics
- Uneven depth of coverage across different subject areas
### Known Limitations
1. Scope: The dataset includes only freely available outlines, not the complete classification texts.
2. Granularity: The level of detail varies between classification systems and within subject areas.
3. Currency: Updates to the original classification systems may not be immediately reflected in this dataset.
4. Structural differences: The UDC system's structure, with its main and auxiliary tables, differs slightly from DDC and LCC, which may affect comparisons.
## Additional Information
### Dataset Curators
Alan Tseng
### Licensing Information
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)