Datasets:

amphora

/

finqa_suite

like 1

['what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2007?', 'and what was it in 2005?', 'what was, then, the change over the years?', 'what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2005?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2005 weighted average exercise price?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan . marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant . through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares . in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted . stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan . no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan . similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price . under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options . in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted . stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan . no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan . beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers . all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited . as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards . restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan . in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package . the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment . marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes . the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment . prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon . the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent . common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan . all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors . when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units . stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million . in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million . tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million . cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 . stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees . the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average exercise price per share</td><td>$ 60.94</td><td>$ 37.84</td><td>$ 25.14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected annual dividends per share</td><td>$ 0.96</td><td>$ 0.80</td><td>$ 0.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life in years</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.1</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted</td><td>$ 17.24</td><td>$ 10.19</td><td>$ 6.15</td></tr></table> .

['60.94', '25.14', '35.8', '25.14', '1.42403']

['what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes between 2016 and 2017?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?', 'what was the change associated with credit facilities during that time?', 'so what was the percentage change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 . the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 . other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 . 14 . debt long-term debt consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )</td><td>2014</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )</td><td>600</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )</td><td>600</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )</td><td>84</td><td>84</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less unamortized debt issuance costs</td><td>-26 ( 26 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>1279</td><td>1278</td></tr></table> credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders . the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 . the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million . the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) . the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio . the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) . the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio . each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility . in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below . in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below . interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually . the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .

['-4.0', '-0.21053', '3.0', '0.375']

['what is the ratio of discretionary company contributions to total expensed amounts for savings plans in 2009?', 'what is that times 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) cash flows for 2010 , we expect to contribute $ 25.2 and $ 9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans , respectively . a significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k . pension plan . additionally , we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k . pension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010 . as a result , we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years . during 2009 , we contributed $ 31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible . the following estimated future benefit payments , which reflect future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid in the years indicated below . domestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domestic pension plans</td><td>foreign pension plans</td><td>postretirement benefit plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 17.2</td><td>$ 23.5</td><td>$ 5.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>11.1</td><td>24.7</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>10.8</td><td>26.4</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>10.5</td><td>28.2</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>10.5</td><td>32.4</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>48.5</td><td>175.3</td><td>24.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 . federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively . expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively . we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated . the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively . in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .

['0.10826', '10.82621']

['what was the equipment rents payable in 2008?', 'and in 2007?', 'so what was the difference between the two years?', 'and the value for 2007 again?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees . approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets . costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no . 67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 10 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2008</td><td>dec . 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 629</td><td>$ 732</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>367</td><td>394</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>390</td><td>371</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income and other taxes</td><td>207</td><td>343</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends and interest</td><td>328</td><td>284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>93</td><td>103</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>546</td><td>675</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total accounts payable and other current liabilities</td><td>$ 2560</td><td>$ 2902</td></tr></table> 11 . fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no . 157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) . fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements . the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations . fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis . this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values . the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities . level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data . level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

['93.0', '103.0', '-10.0', '103.0', '-0.09709']

['how much did the gallons hedged in 2018 represent in relation to the ones hedged in 2017?', 'and in the previous year of this period, what was the aggregate fair value of the outstanding fuel hedges?', 'what was it in 2015?', 'how much, then, did the 2016 fair value represent in relation to this 2015 one?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 . financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices . these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) . the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>gallons hedged</td><td>weighted average contractprice per gallon</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>12000000</td><td>$ 2.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>3000000</td><td>2.61</td></tr></table> if the national u.s . on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty . if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty . the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) . the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 were current liabilities of $ 2.7 million and $ 37.8 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets . the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a gain of $ 0.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , and a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income . total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income ( loss ) for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 20.7 million , $ ( 2.0 ) million and $ ( 24.2 ) million , for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we classify cash inflows and outflows from our fuel hedges within operating activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows . recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated containers and old newsprint . from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities . during 2016 , we entered into multiple agreements related to the forecasted occ sales . the agreements qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of certain forecasted recycling commodity sales ( commodity hedges ) . we entered into costless collar agreements on forecasted sales of occ . the agreements involve combining a purchased put option giving us the right to sell occ at an established floor strike price with a written call option obligating us to deliver occ at an established cap strike price . the puts and calls have the same settlement dates , are net settled in cash on such dates and have the same terms to expiration . the contemporaneous combination of options resulted in no net premium for us and represents costless collars . under these agreements , we will make or receive no payments as long as the settlement price is between the floor price and cap price ; however , if the settlement price is above the cap , we will pay the counterparty an amount equal to the excess of the settlement price over the cap times the monthly volumes hedged . if the settlement price is below the floor , the counterparty will pay us the deficit of the settlement price below the floor times the monthly volumes hedged . the objective of these agreements is to reduce variability of cash flows for forecasted sales of occ between two designated strike prices. .

['4.0', '37.8', '2.7', '14.0']

['what was the total african and us net undeveloped acres expiring in 2016?', 'what percentage of undeveloped acres were in the us in 2018?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell . the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition . net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>68</td><td>89</td><td>128</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>e.g .</td><td>2014</td><td>92</td><td>36</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other africa</td><td>189</td><td>4352</td><td>854</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total africa</td><td>189</td><td>4444</td><td>890</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other international</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>257</td><td>4533</td><td>1018</td></tr></table> .

['257.0', '0.12574']

['what was the cash provided by operating activities in 2013?', 'and in 2012?', 'so what was the difference in this value between the years?', 'and the value for 2012 again?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-2982 ( 2982 )</td><td>-3049 ( 3049 )</td><td>-2682 ( 2682 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cashequivalents</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 369</td><td>$ -154 ( 154 )</td></tr></table> operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) . higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 . in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 . lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 . investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

['6823.0', '6161.0', '662.0', '6161.0', '0.10745']

['what is the amount of oil and gas mmboe from canada divided by the total?', 'what is that times 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 . we will evaluate how the new requirements of statement no . 141 ( r ) would impact any business combinations completed in 2009 or thereafter . in december 2007 , the fasb also issued statement of financial accounting standards no . 160 , noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements 2014an amendment of accounting research bulletin no . 51 . a noncontrolling interest , sometimes called a minority interest , is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable , directly or indirectly , to a parent . statement no . 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . under statement no . 160 , noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary must be reported as a component of consolidated equity separate from the parent 2019s equity . additionally , the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest must be reported separately on the face of the income statement . statement no . 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited . we do not expect the adoption of statement no . 160 to have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures . 2008 estimates the forward-looking statements provided in this discussion are based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information that was used to prepare the december 31 , 2007 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . these forward-looking statements were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , natural gas and ngls during 2008 will be substantially similar to those of 2007 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using a projected average 2008 exchange rate of $ 0.98 u.s . dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . in january 2007 , we announced our intent to divest our west african oil and gas assets and terminate our operations in west africa , including equatorial guinea , cote d 2019ivoire , gabon and other countries in the region . in november 2007 , we announced an agreement to sell our operations in gabon for $ 205.5 million . we are finalizing purchase and sales agreements and obtaining the necessary partner and government approvals for the remaining properties in this divestiture package . we are optimistic we can complete these sales during the first half of 2008 . all west african related revenues , expenses and capital will be reported as discontinued operations in our 2008 financial statements . accordingly , all forward-looking estimates in the following discussion exclude amounts related to our operations in west africa , unless otherwise noted . though we have completed several major property acquisitions and dispositions in recent years , these transactions are opportunity driven . thus , the following forward-looking estimates do not include any financial and operating effects of potential property acquisitions or divestitures that may occur during 2008 , except for west africa as previously discussed . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2008 . we estimate that our combined 2008 oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 240 to 247 mmboe . of this total , approximately 92% ( 92 % ) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31 , 2007 . the following estimates for oil , gas and ngl production are calculated at the midpoint of the estimated range for total production . oil gas ngls total ( mmbbls ) ( bcf ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>12</td><td>626</td><td>23</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . offshore</td><td>8</td><td>68</td><td>1</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>canada</td><td>23</td><td>198</td><td>4</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>international</td><td>23</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>66</td><td>894</td><td>28</td><td>243</td></tr></table> .

['0.24691', '24.69136']

['what was the total of risk and insurance brokerage services segment revenue in 2009?', 'and what was that in 2008?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 total, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: risk and insurance brokerage services . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment revenue</td><td>$ 6305</td><td>$ 6197</td><td>$ 5918</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment operating income</td><td>900</td><td>846</td><td>954</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>segment operating income margin</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>13.7% ( 13.7 % )</td><td>16.1% ( 16.1 % )</td></tr></table> during 2009 we continued to see a soft market , which began in 2007 , in our retail brokerage product line . in 2007 , we experienced a soft market in many business lines and in many geographic areas . in a 2018 2018soft market , 2019 2019 premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity . changes in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds . prices fell throughout 2007 , with the greatest declines seen in large and middle-market accounts . prices continued to decline during 2008 , although the rate of decline slowed toward the end of the year . in our reinsurance brokerage product line , pricing overall during 2009 was also down , although during a portion of the year it was flat to up slightly . additionally , beginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , we faced difficult conditions as a result of unprecedented disruptions in the global economy , the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets . continued volatility and further deterioration in the credit markets have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our retail brokerage and reinsurance brokerage products , which have negatively hurt our operational results . in addition , overall capacity in the industry could decrease if a significant insurer either fails or withdraws from writing insurance coverages that we offer our clients . this failure could reduce our revenues and profitability , since we would no longer have access to certain lines and types of insurance . risk and insurance brokerage services generated approximately 83% ( 83 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 . revenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients . our revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients 2019 policy renewals , the net effect of new and lost business , the timing of services provided to our clients , and the income we earn on investments , which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates . we operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms , as well as with individual brokers , agents , and direct writers of insurance coverage . specifically , we address the highly specialized product development and risk management needs of commercial enterprises , professional groups , insurance companies , governments , healthcare providers , and non-profit groups , among others ; provide affinity products for professional liability , life , disability income , and personal lines for individuals , associations , and businesses ; provide reinsurance services to insurance and reinsurance companies and other risk assumption entities by acting as brokers or intermediaries on all classes of reinsurance ; provide investment banking products and services , including mergers and acquisitions and other financial advisory services , capital raising , contingent capital financing , insurance-linked securitizations and derivative applications ; provide managing underwriting to independent agents and brokers as well as corporate clients ; provide actuarial , loss prevention , and administrative services to businesses and consumers ; and manage captive insurance companies . in november 2008 we expanded our product offerings through the merger with benfield , a leading independent reinsurance intermediary . benfield products have been integrated with our existing reinsurance products in 2009 . in february 2009 , we completed the sale of the u.s . operations of cananwill , our premium finance business . in june and july of 2009 , we entered into agreements with third parties with respect to our .

['6305.0', '6197.0', '108.0', '0.01743']

['what is the change in price of the s&p 500 from 2015 to 2016?', 'what is 100000 divided by 100?', 'what is the product of the change by the quotient?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/28/2013</td><td>1/3/2015</td><td>1/2/2016</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/30/2017</td><td>12/29/2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 135.18</td><td>$ 149.39</td><td>$ 181.05</td><td>$ 300.22</td><td>$ 311.13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>112.60</td><td>113.64</td><td>133.19</td><td>172.11</td><td>165.84</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.28</td><td>109.54</td><td>129.05</td><td>157.22</td><td>150.33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.49</td><td>121.08</td><td>144.85</td><td>201.10</td><td>200.52</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

['18.77', '1000.0', '18770.0']

['what is the ratio of fair value to carrying value?', 'what is that less 1?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: credit facility , which was amended in 2013 and 2012 . in march 2014 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019 . the amount of the aggregate commitment is $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2014 credit facility 201d ) . the 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2014 . the 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2014 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility . commercial paper program . on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion . blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion in 2011 and to $ 3.785 billion in 2012 . in april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion . the cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility . at december 31 , 2014 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding . long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2014 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>maturity amount</td><td>unamortized discount</td><td>carrying value</td><td>fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015</td><td>$ 750</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 750</td><td>$ 753</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017</td><td>700</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>699</td><td>785</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019</td><td>1000</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>998</td><td>1134</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021</td><td>750</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>747</td><td>825</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022</td><td>750</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>747</td><td>783</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024</td><td>1000</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>997</td><td>1029</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term borrowings</td><td>$ 4950</td><td>$ -12 ( 12 )</td><td>$ 4938</td><td>$ 5309</td></tr></table> long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2013 had a carrying value of $ 4.939 billion and a fair value of $ 5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013 . 2024 notes . in march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) . the net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year . the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $ 3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 6 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes . at december 31 , 2014 , $ 6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2015 and 2022 notes . in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) . net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes . at december 31 , 2014 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . ( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) . interest .

['1.07513', '0.07513']

['what was the number of gas customers in 2008?', 'and what was it in 2007?', 'what was, then, the change in that number over the year?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2007 number of customers, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>15.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>6.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base revenue</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 252.7</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

['93000.0', '86000.0', '7000.0', '0.0814']

['what was, in millions, the operating income in 2017?', 'and what was it in 2016?', 'what was, then, the change over the year, in millions?', 'and in the previous year, what was the decline in the net earnings, also in millions?', 'what is that as a percentage of the 2015 net earnings?', 'what, then, can be concluded to have been those 2015 earnings, in millions?', 'and what is that in billions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: net revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan . these net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers . excluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 . in some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes . in 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories . excise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) . our cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , $</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 10432</td><td>$ 9391</td><td>$ 1041</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>marketing administration and research costs</td><td>6725</td><td>6405</td><td>320</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income</td><td>11503</td><td>10815</td><td>688</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td></tr></table> cost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) . marketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) . operating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) . interest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income . our effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) . the 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act . for further details , see item 8 , note 11 . income taxes to our consolidated financial statements . we are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability . based upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction . we are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions . it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties . an estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time . net earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) . this decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income . diluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) . excluding .

['11503.0', '10815.0', '688.0', '932.0', '0.134', '6955.22388', '6.95522']

['what was the difference in total shipment volume between 2010 and 2011?', 'and the specific value for 2010?', 'so what was the growth rate over this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: middleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains . in the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture . marlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) . in january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally . marlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family . pm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount . these gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands . in the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points . the brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies . in december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 . the following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 . net revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments . operating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) . for 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories . after adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day . pm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) . marlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 . in the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) . pm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 . middleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 . for 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro . marlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points . in 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels . middleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 . for 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 . black & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions . during the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine . this new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties . during the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas . middleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically . smokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management . the following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( cans and packs in millions )</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>copenhagen</td><td>392.5</td><td>354.2</td><td>327.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>skoal</td><td>288.4</td><td>286.8</td><td>274.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>copenhagenandskoal</td><td>680.9</td><td>641.0</td><td>601.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>82.4</td><td>93.6</td><td>122.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total smokeless products</td><td>763.3</td><td>734.6</td><td>724.4</td></tr></table> volume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment . other includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products . new types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations .

['10.2', '724.4', '0.01408']

['what were the total accumulated other comprehensive losses in 2015?', 'and what were they in 2014?', 'by what amount, then, did they increase over the year?', 'what is this increase as a percent of the 2014 losses?', 'and over the precedent year, from 2013 to 2014, what was that increase in those losses?', 'and what is this precedent year increase as a percent of the 2013 losses?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( losses ) earnings ( in millions )</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2015</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>currency translation adjustments</td><td>$ -6129 ( 6129 )</td><td>$ -3929 ( 3929 )</td><td>$ -2207 ( 2207 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other benefits</td><td>-3332 ( 3332 )</td><td>-3020 ( 3020 )</td><td>-2046 ( 2046 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives accounted for as hedges</td><td>59</td><td>123</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total accumulated other comprehensive losses</td><td>$ -9402 ( 9402 )</td><td>$ -6826 ( 6826 )</td><td>$ -4190 ( 4190 )</td></tr></table> reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 . the movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business . in addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . colombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products . the investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco . as a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement . these discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 . note 19 . rbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc . ( "rothmans" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc . ( "rbh" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand . the settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period . rothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh . the remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. .

['9402.0', '6826.0', '2576.0', '0.37738', '2636.0', '0.62912']

['what was the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2011?', 'and what were the accrued casualty costs during 2010?', 'assuming these accrued casualty costs were completely repaired in the following year, what then becomes that 2011 total expense?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.2 billion for 2011 , $ 2.0 billion for 2010 , and $ 1.9 billion for 2009 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 12 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2011</td><td>dec . 31 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 819</td><td>$ 677</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes</td><td>482</td><td>337</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>363</td><td>357</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>284</td><td>183</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>249</td><td>325</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>197</td><td>200</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>90</td><td>86</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>624</td><td>548</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3108</td><td>$ 2713</td></tr></table> 13 . financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities . determination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows . interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period . we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings . we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix . in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities . swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates . we account for swaps as fair value .

['2200.0', '325.0', '2525.0']

['in the year of 2008, what was the variance of the foreign exchange products in the first section?', 'and what was it in the second section?', 'what was, then, the combined total variance for both sections?', 'and what was the average variance between them?', 'in that same year, what was the combined total for the annual average related to interest-rate products, also in both sections?', 'and what was the average between them?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table presents var with respect to our trading activities , as measured by our var methodology for the periods indicated : value-at-risk . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( inmillions )</td><td>2008 annual average</td><td>2008 maximum</td><td>2008 minimum</td><td>2008 annual average</td><td>2008 maximum</td><td>minimum</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign exchange products</td><td>$ 1.8</td><td>$ 4.7</td><td>$ .3</td><td>$ 1.8</td><td>$ 4.0</td><td>$ .7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest-rate products</td><td>1.1</td><td>2.4</td><td>.6</td><td>1.4</td><td>3.7</td><td>.1</td></tr></table> we back-test the estimated one-day var on a daily basis . this information is reviewed and used to confirm that all relevant trading positions are properly modeled . for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we did not experience any actual trading losses in excess of our end-of-day var estimate . asset and liability management activities the primary objective of asset and liability management is to provide sustainable and growing net interest revenue , or nir , under varying economic environments , while protecting the economic values of our balance sheet assets and liabilities from the adverse effects of changes in interest rates . most of our nir is earned from the investment of deposits generated by our core investment servicing and investment management businesses . we structure our balance sheet assets to generally conform to the characteristics of our balance sheet liabilities , but we manage our overall interest-rate risk position in the context of current and anticipated market conditions and within internally-approved risk guidelines . our overall interest-rate risk position is maintained within a series of policies approved by the board and guidelines established and monitored by alco . our global treasury group has responsibility for managing state street 2019s day-to-day interest-rate risk . to effectively manage the consolidated balance sheet and related nir , global treasury has the authority to take a limited amount of interest-rate risk based on market conditions and its views about the direction of global interest rates over both short-term and long-term time horizons . global treasury manages our exposure to changes in interest rates on a consolidated basis organized into three regional treasury units , north america , europe and asia/pacific , to reflect the growing , global nature of our exposures and to capture the impact of change in regional market environments on our total risk position . our investment activities and our use of derivative financial instruments are the primary tools used in managing interest-rate risk . we invest in financial instruments with currency , repricing , and maturity characteristics we consider appropriate to manage our overall interest-rate risk position . in addition to on-balance sheet assets , we use certain derivatives , primarily interest-rate swaps , to alter the interest-rate characteristics of specific balance sheet assets or liabilities . the use of derivatives is subject to alco-approved guidelines . additional information about our use of derivatives is in note 17 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k under item 8 . as a result of growth in our non-u.s . operations , non-u.s . dollar denominated customer liabilities are a significant portion of our consolidated balance sheet . this growth results in exposure to changes in the shape and level of non-u.s . dollar yield curves , which we include in our consolidated interest-rate risk management process . because no one individual measure can accurately assess all of our exposures to changes in interest rates , we use several quantitative measures in our assessment of current and potential future exposures to changes in interest rates and their impact on net interest revenue and balance sheet values . net interest revenue simulation is the primary tool used in our evaluation of the potential range of possible net interest revenue results that could occur under a variety of interest-rate environments . we also use market valuation and duration analysis to assess changes in the economic value of balance sheet assets and liabilities caused by assumed changes in interest rates . finally , gap analysis 2014the difference between the amount of balance sheet assets and liabilities re-pricing within a specified time period 2014is used as a measurement of our interest-rate risk position. .

['4.4', '3.3', '7.7', '3.85', '2.5', '1.25']

['what was the amount of notes maturing in june 2022?', 'and the maturity amount due in 2017?', 'combined, what is the total of these two values?', 'and the total long-term borrowings?', 'and the total portion due in the next 36 months?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: credit facility , which was amended in 2013 and 2012 . in march 2014 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019 . the amount of the aggregate commitment is $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2014 credit facility 201d ) . the 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2014 . the 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2014 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility . commercial paper program . on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion . blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion in 2011 and to $ 3.785 billion in 2012 . in april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion . the cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility . at december 31 , 2014 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding . long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2014 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>maturity amount</td><td>unamortized discount</td><td>carrying value</td><td>fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015</td><td>$ 750</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 750</td><td>$ 753</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017</td><td>700</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>699</td><td>785</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019</td><td>1000</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>998</td><td>1134</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021</td><td>750</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>747</td><td>825</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022</td><td>750</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>747</td><td>783</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024</td><td>1000</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>997</td><td>1029</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term borrowings</td><td>$ 4950</td><td>$ -12 ( 12 )</td><td>$ 4938</td><td>$ 5309</td></tr></table> long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2013 had a carrying value of $ 4.939 billion and a fair value of $ 5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013 . 2024 notes . in march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) . the net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year . the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $ 3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 6 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes . at december 31 , 2014 , $ 6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2015 and 2022 notes . in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) . net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes . at december 31 , 2014 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . ( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) . interest .

['750.0', '700.0', '1450.0', '4950.0', '0.29293']

['what is the sum of long-term debt due in 2004 and 2005?', 'what is the value for 2006?', 'what is the total sum including all 3 years?', 'what is that divided by 1000?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds . ( b ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed . ( c ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2004 and can then be remarketed . ( d ) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1 , 2003 . entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders , pursuant to the mandatory tender provision , and has not remarketed the bonds at this time . entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds . ( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st . charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 . ( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed . ( g ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( h ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2003 , for the next five years are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 503215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 462420</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 75896</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624539</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 941625</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above . in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur. .

['965635.0', '75896.0', '1041531.0', '1041.531']

['what was the net favorable prior period development in 2010?', 'and what was it in 2008?', 'what was, then, the change over the years?', 'what was the net favorable prior period development in 2008?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 amount, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table shows the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums and the impact of prior period development on our consolidated loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loss and loss expense ratio as reported</td><td>59.2% ( 59.2 % )</td><td>58.8% ( 58.8 % )</td><td>60.6% ( 60.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums</td><td>( 3.2 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 1.2 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 4.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>prior period development</td><td>4.6% ( 4.6 % )</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td><td>6.8% ( 6.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>large assumed loss portfolio transfers</td><td>( 0.3 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 0.8 ) % ( % )</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loss and loss expense ratio adjusted</td><td>60.3% ( 60.3 % )</td><td>61.7% ( 61.7 % )</td><td>62.7% ( 62.7 % )</td></tr></table> we recorded net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 366 million in 2010 compared with net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 137 million and $ 567 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the catastrophe losses for 2010 were primarily related to weather- related events in the u.s. , earthquakes in chile , mexico , and new zealand , and storms in australia and europe . the catastrophe losses for 2009 were primarily related to an earthquake in asia , floods in europe , several weather-related events in the u.s. , and a european windstorm . for 2008 , the catastrophe losses were primarily related to hurricanes gustav and ike . prior period development arises from changes to loss estimates recognized in the current year that relate to loss reserves first reported in previous calendar years and excludes the effect of losses from the development of earned premium from pre- vious accident years . we experienced $ 503 million of net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments in 2010 . this compares with net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments of $ 576 million and $ 814 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . refer to 201cprior period development 201d for more information . the adjusted loss and loss expense ratio declined in 2010 , compared with 2009 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , non-recurring premium adjustment and the reduction in assumed loss portfolio business , which is written at higher loss ratios than other types of business . our policy acquisition costs include commissions , premium taxes , underwriting , and other costs that vary with , and are primarily related to , the production of premium . administrative expenses include all other operating costs . our policy acquis- ition cost ratio increased in 2010 , compared with 2009 . the increase was primarily related to the impact of crop settlements , which generated higher profit-share commissions and a lower adjustment to net premiums earned , as well as the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in connection with catastrophe activity and changes in business mix . our administrative expense ratio increased in 2010 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , reinstatement premiums expensed , and increased costs in our international operations . although the crop settlements generate minimal administrative expenses , they resulted in lower adjustment to net premiums earned in 2010 , compared with 2009 . administrative expenses in 2010 , were partially offset by higher net results generated by our third party claims administration business , esis , the results of which are included within our administrative expenses . esis generated $ 85 million in net results in 2010 , compared with $ 26 million in 2009 . the increase is primarily from non-recurring sources . our policy acquisition cost ratio was stable in 2009 , compared with 2008 , as increases in our combined insurance operations were offset by more favorable final crop year settlement of profit share commissions . administrative expenses increased in 2009 , primarily due to the inclusion of administrative expenses related to combined insurance for the full year and costs associated with new product expansion in our domestic retail operation and in our personal lines business . our effective income tax rate , which we calculate as income tax expense divided by income before income tax , is depend- ent upon the mix of earnings from different jurisdictions with various tax rates . a change in the geographic mix of earnings would change the effective income tax rate . our effective income tax rate was 15 percent in 2010 , compared with 17 percent and 24 percent in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the decrease in our effective income tax rate in 2010 , was primarily due to a change in the mix of earnings to lower tax-paying jurisdictions , a decrease in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits which was the result of a settlement with the u.s . internal revenue service appeals division regarding federal tax returns for the years 2002-2004 , and the recognition of a non-taxable gain related to the acquisition of rain and hail . the 2009 year included a reduction of a deferred tax valuation allowance related to investments . for 2008 , our effective income tax rate was adversely impacted by a change in mix of earnings due to the impact of catastrophe losses in lower tax-paying jurisdictions . prior period development the favorable prior period development , inclusive of the life segment , of $ 512 million during 2010 was the net result of sev- eral underlying favorable and adverse movements . with respect to ace 2019s crop business , ace regularly receives reports from its managing general agent ( mga ) relating to the previous crop year ( s ) in subsequent calendar quarters and this typically results .

['503.0', '814.0', '-311.0', '814.0', '-0.38206']

['what was the change in net revenues during 2003?', 'what is the percent change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above . the increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 922.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>59.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>8.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume</td><td>-16.2 ( 16.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vidalia settlement</td><td>-9.2 ( 9.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>8.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 973.7</td></tr></table> the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 . see "critical accounting estimates" for more details on sfas 143 . the increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income . the volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory . billed usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .

['50.8', '0.05504']

['what is the last year in which payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be approximately $ 26 million?', 'and what is the first year?', 'how many years, then, are comprehended in this period?', 'and what is the total of payments to participants in the unfunded german plans for each of those years?', 'what is, then, the total amount of those payments in all of the years combined, in million?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: page 31 of 94 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases , purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31 , 2007 , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 2302.6</td><td>$ 126.1</td><td>$ 547.6</td><td>$ 1174.9</td><td>$ 454.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>4.4</td><td>1.0</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.5</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( b )</td><td>698.6</td><td>142.9</td><td>246.3</td><td>152.5</td><td>156.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating leases</td><td>218.5</td><td>49.9</td><td>71.7</td><td>42.5</td><td>54.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>6092.6</td><td>2397.2</td><td>3118.8</td><td>576.6</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>common stock repurchase agreements</td><td>131.0</td><td>131.0</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>legal settlement</td><td>70.0</td><td>70.0</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total payments on contractual obligations</td><td>$ 9517.7</td><td>$ 2918.1</td><td>$ 3985.2</td><td>$ 1947.0</td><td>$ 667.4</td></tr></table> total payments on contractual obligations $ 9517.7 $ 2918.1 $ 3985.2 $ 1947.0 $ 667.4 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 49 million in 2008 . this estimate may change based on plan asset performance . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 66 million , $ 70 million , $ 74 million , $ 77 million and $ 82 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and a total of $ 473 million for the years 2013 through 2017 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be approximately $ 26 million in each of the years 2008 through 2012 and a total of $ 136 million for the years 2013 through 2017 . in accordance with united kingdom pension regulations , ball has provided an a38 million guarantee to the plan for its defined benefit plan in the united kingdom . if the company 2019s credit rating falls below specified levels , ball will be required to either : ( 1 ) contribute an additional a38 million to the plan ; ( 2 ) provide a letter of credit to the plan in that amount or ( 3 ) if imposed by the appropriate regulatory agency , provide a lien on company assets in that amount for the benefit of the plan . the guarantee can be removed upon approval by both ball and the pension plan trustees . our share repurchase program in 2007 was $ 211.3 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 45.7 million net repurchases in 2006 and $ 358.1 million in 2005 . the net repurchases included the $ 51.9 million settlement on january 5 , 2007 , of a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . however , the 2007 net repurchases did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 675000 shares . the contract was settled on january 7 , 2008 , for $ 31 million in cash . on december 12 , 2007 , in a privately negotiated transaction , ball entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $ 100 million of its common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings . the company advanced the $ 100 million on january 7 , 2008 , and received approximately 2 million shares , which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price . the exact number of shares to be repurchased under the agreement , which will be determined on the settlement date ( no later than june 5 , 2008 ) , is subject to an adjustment based on a weighted average price calculation for the period between the initial purchase date and the settlement date . the company has the option to settle the contract in either cash or shares . including the settlements of the forward share purchase contract and the accelerated share repurchase agreement , we expect to repurchase approximately $ 300 million of our common shares , net of issuances , in 2008 . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . total dividends paid were $ 40.6 million in 2007 , $ 41 million in 2006 and $ 42.5 million in 2005. .

['2012.0', '2008.0', '4.0', '26.0', '104.0']

["what's the portion of fair value to carrying value?", 'so what percentage higher is fair value than carrying value?', 'what is the fair value of all notes due in 2015 and 2017?', 'and including the value of notes due in 2019?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: credit facility , which was amended in 2013 and 2012 . in march 2014 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019 . the amount of the aggregate commitment is $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2014 credit facility 201d ) . the 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2014 . the 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2014 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility . commercial paper program . on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion . blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion in 2011 and to $ 3.785 billion in 2012 . in april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion . the cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility . at december 31 , 2014 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding . long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2014 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>maturity amount</td><td>unamortized discount</td><td>carrying value</td><td>fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015</td><td>$ 750</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 750</td><td>$ 753</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017</td><td>700</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>699</td><td>785</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019</td><td>1000</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>998</td><td>1134</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021</td><td>750</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>747</td><td>825</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022</td><td>750</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>747</td><td>783</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024</td><td>1000</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>997</td><td>1029</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term borrowings</td><td>$ 4950</td><td>$ -12 ( 12 )</td><td>$ 4938</td><td>$ 5309</td></tr></table> long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2013 had a carrying value of $ 4.939 billion and a fair value of $ 5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013 . 2024 notes . in march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) . the net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year . the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $ 3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 6 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes . at december 31 , 2014 , $ 6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2015 and 2022 notes . in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) . net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes . at december 31 , 2014 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . ( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) . interest .

['1.07513', '0.07513', '1538.0', '2672.0']

['what are the annual long-term obligations in 2014?', 'what is that divided by 1000?', 'what are lease obligation at entergy lousiana?', 'what is that value over the prior quotient?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds . ( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . ( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations . ( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year . fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 385373</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 1110566</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 270852</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 766801</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 1324616</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 . in july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 . entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 . entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 . capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .

['385373.0', '385.373', '149.0', '0.38664']

['what was the tier 2 capital in 2008?', 'and what was it in 2007?', 'how much, then, did the 2008 amount represent in relation to this 2007 one?', 'and in that last year of the period, what was the total capital?', 'what was it in 2007?', 'by how much, then, did it increase over the year?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts ( trust preferred securities ) , which qualify as tier 1 capital , were $ 23.899 billion at december 31 , 2008 , as compared to $ 23.594 billion at december 31 , 2007 . in 2008 , citigroup did not issue any new enhanced trust preferred securities . the frb issued a final rule , with an effective date of april 11 , 2005 , which retains trust preferred securities in tier 1 capital of bank holding companies , but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards . under the rule , after a five-year transition period , the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other restricted core capital elements included in tier 1 capital of internationally active banking organizations , such as citigroup , would be limited to 15% ( 15 % ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill , less any associated deferred tax liability . the amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in tier 2 capital , subject to restrictions . at december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) against the limit . the company expects to be within restricted core capital limits prior to the implementation date of march 31 , 2009 . the frb permits additional securities , such as the equity units sold to adia , to be included in tier 1 capital up to 25% ( 25 % ) ( including the restricted core capital elements in the 15% ( 15 % ) limit ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability . at december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) against the limit . the frb granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting sfas 158 at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . the frb and the ffiec may propose amendments to , and issue interpretations of , risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions . these may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-weighted assets . capital resources of citigroup 2019s depository institutions citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions in the united states are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies , which are similar to the frb 2019s guidelines . to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , citigroup 2019s depository institutions must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) and a leverage ratio of at least 5% ( 5 % ) , and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels . at december 31 , 2008 , all of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions were 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal regulatory agencies 2019 definitions , including citigroup 2019s primary depository institution , citibank , n.a. , as noted in the following table : citibank , n.a . components of capital and ratios under regulatory guidelines in billions of dollars at year end 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars at year end</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>$ 71.0</td><td>$ 82.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )</td><td>108.4</td><td>121.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>9.94% ( 9.94 % )</td><td>8.98% ( 8.98 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total capital ratio ( tier 1 and tier 2 )</td><td>15.18</td><td>13.33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>leverage ratio ( 1 )</td><td>5.82</td><td>6.65</td></tr></table> leverage ratio ( 1 ) 5.82 6.65 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets . citibank , n.a . had a net loss for 2008 amounting to $ 6.2 billion . during 2008 , citibank , n.a . received contributions from its parent company of $ 6.1 billion . citibank , n.a . did not issue any additional subordinated notes in 2008 . total subordinated notes issued to citicorp holdings inc . that were outstanding at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 and included in citibank , n.a . 2019s tier 2 capital , amounted to $ 28.2 billion . citibank , n.a . received an additional $ 14.3 billion in capital contribution from its parent company in january 2009 . the impact of this contribution is not reflected in the table above . the substantial events in 2008 impacting the capital of citigroup , and the potential future events discussed on page 94 under 201ccitigroup regulatory capital ratios , 201d also affected , or could affect , citibank , n.a. .

['37.4', '39.6', '0.94444', '108.4', '121.6', '-13.2']

['what was the change in the rd&e spendings from 2013 to 2014?', 'and what is this change as a percentage of those spendings in 2013?', 'in this same year, what were these spendings as a percentage of the total net sales?', 'what were, then, those net sales, in billions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 27 , 2013 and october 28 , 2012 was as follows : 2013 2012 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td></td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems group</td><td>$ 1295</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 705</td><td>44% ( 44 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>591</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>580</td><td>36% ( 36 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>361</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td><td>206</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>125</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td><td>115</td><td>7% ( 7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2372</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 1606</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers . research , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products . the company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle . applied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements . product development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china . in addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india . process support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel . applied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 , and $ 1.1 billion ( 11 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2011 . applied has spent an average of 14 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years . in addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .

['0.1', '0.08333', '0.18', '7.22222']

['what was the 2016 net revenue?', 'what was the 2015 net revenue?', 'what is the 2016 less the 2015 values?', 'what is that difference divided by the 2015 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-149 ( 149 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rhode island state energy center</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nuclear fuel expenses</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1542</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue . the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 . see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

['1542.0', '1666.0', '-124.0', '-0.07443']

['what was the average revenue from discontinued operations in 2013?', 'what was the value in 2011?', 'what is the sum of those 2 years?', 'what is the sum divided by 2?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued 9 . acquisitions dbsd north america and terrestar transactions on march 2 , 2012 , the fcc approved the transfer of 40 mhz of aws-4 wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar to us . on march 9 , 2012 , we completed the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction , pursuant to which we acquired , among other things , certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar . in addition , during the fourth quarter 2011 , we and sprint entered into a mutual release and settlement agreement ( the 201csprint settlement agreement 201d ) pursuant to which all issues then being disputed relating to the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction were resolved between us and sprint , including , but not limited to , issues relating to costs allegedly incurred by sprint to relocate users from the spectrum then licensed to dbsd north america and terrestar . the total consideration to acquire the dbsd north america and terrestar assets was approximately $ 2.860 billion . this amount includes $ 1.364 billion for the dbsd transaction , $ 1.382 billion for the terrestar transaction , and the net payment of $ 114 million to sprint pursuant to the sprint settlement agreement . see note 16 for further information . as a result of these acquisitions , we recognized the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on our estimates of fair value at their acquisition date , including $ 102 million in an uncertain tax position in 201clong-term deferred revenue , distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets . subsequently , in the third quarter 2013 , this uncertain tax position was resolved and $ 102 million was reversed and recorded as a decrease in 201cincome tax ( provision ) benefit , net 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . 10 . discontinued operations as of december 31 , 2013 , blockbuster had ceased all material operations . accordingly , our consolidated balance sheets , consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) and consolidated statements of cash flows have been recast to present blockbuster as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the amounts presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements relate only to our continuing operations , unless otherwise noted . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the revenue from our discontinued operations was $ 503 million , $ 1.085 billion and $ 974 million , respectively . 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 54 million , $ 62 million and $ 3 million , respectively . in addition , 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 47 million , $ 37 million and $ 7 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , the net assets from our discontinued operations consisted of the following : december 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>as of december 31 2013 ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets from discontinued operations</td><td>$ 68239</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>noncurrent assets from discontinued operations</td><td>9965</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current liabilities from discontinued operations</td><td>-49471 ( 49471 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term liabilities from discontinued operations</td><td>-19804 ( 19804 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net assets from discontinued operations</td><td>$ 8929</td></tr></table> .

['503.0', '974.0', '1477.0', '738.5']

['what was the value of liability in 2007?', 'what was it in 2003?', 'what is the sum of those 2 years?', 'what is the total sum including the 2001 value?', 'what is the average per year?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2007 program</td><td>2003 program</td><td>2001 program</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liability at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 12.6</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>$ 31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments</td><td>19.1</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>13.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td><td>-3.1 ( 3.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 11.9</td><td>$ 9.0</td><td>$ 8.7</td><td>$ 29.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net charges and adjustments</td><td>4.3</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.7</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-15.0 ( 15.0 )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>-3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liability at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 5.9</td><td>$ 12.8</td></tr></table> 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

['1.2', '5.7', '6.9', '12.8', '4.26667']

['what is the net change in the balance of other intangible assets net from 2003 to 2004?', 'what percentage change does this represent?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 1369607</td><td>$ 1299521</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>89736</td><td>111484</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>43404</td><td>43125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1502747</td><td>1454130</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td><td>-434381 ( 434381 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 985303</td><td>$ 1019749</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .

['-34446.0', '-0.03378']

['what is the value of citi common stock in 2017 less an initial $100 investment?', 'what is that divided by 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>131.8</td><td>132.4</td><td>135.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>137.0</td><td>150.5</td><td>156.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>131.4</td><td>152.6</td><td>153.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>152.3</td><td>170.8</td><td>188.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2017</td><td>193.5</td><td>208.1</td><td>230.9</td></tr></table> .

['93.5', '0.935']

['what was the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2018?', 'what was the value in 2017?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is the percent change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes . the deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized . we provide u.s . income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system . to the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s . tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings . as of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s . income taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million . the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million . as of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state . we also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively . the net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 . the state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely . the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized . as of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets . for fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 172945</td><td>$ 178413</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>16191</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>-4000 ( 4000 )</td><td>-30166 ( 30166 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>60721</td><td>24927</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td><td>-3876 ( 3876 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-45922 ( 45922 )</td><td>-8819 ( 8819 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-3783 ( 3783 )</td><td>8786</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 196152</td><td>$ 172945</td></tr></table> the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . these amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years . we file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states . for ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .

['196152.0', '172945.0', '23207.0', '0.13419']

['what is the total of estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash in 2009?', 'what is it in 2013?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is the net change over the 2013 value?', 'what is that times 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases . the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries . the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors . we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable . when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity . however , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date . in such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date . if deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense . compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses . this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners . the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 . as such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . as of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 67.5</td><td>$ 32.1</td><td>$ 30.1</td><td>$ 4.5</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 139.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>put and call options with affiliates1</td><td>11.8</td><td>34.3</td><td>73.6</td><td>70.8</td><td>70.2</td><td>2.2</td><td>262.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>79.3</td><td>66.4</td><td>103.7</td><td>75.3</td><td>75.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>402.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less cash compensation expense included above</td><td>2.6</td><td>1.3</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.3</td><td>2014</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 76.7</td><td>$ 65.1</td><td>$ 103.0</td><td>$ 74.6</td><td>$ 75.6</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>$ 397.2</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions . in such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable . as a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no . d-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .

['76.7', '75.6', '1.1', '0.01434', '1.43416']

['as of december 31, 2012, what was the remaining amount under the share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock?', 'and in the year before, what was the average price paid per share?', 'what was it in 2010?', 'by how much, then, did it increase over the year?', 'and how much did that increase represent in relation to the 2010 price?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: during the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) . during the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . 0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 . on july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 . schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total cost of shares purchased</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 971883</td><td>14087.8</td><td>$ 68.99</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 2997688</td><td>36940.4</td><td>$ 81.15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 1716675</td><td>26624.8</td><td>$ 64.48</td></tr></table> 0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 . in recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there . schlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries . at december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) . 0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively . on january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 . on january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 . on january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 . capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 . 0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans . the us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions . 0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 . during 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .

['0.88', '81.15', '64.48', '16.67', '0.25853']

['what is the difference of the price of cadence design from 2007 to 2012?', 'what is that divided by 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/29/2007</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>22.55</td><td>35.17</td><td>48.50</td><td>61.07</td><td>78.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>59.03</td><td>82.25</td><td>97.32</td><td>98.63</td><td>110.78</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.60</td><td>82.76</td><td>108.11</td><td>95.48</td><td>109.88</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

['-21.08', '-0.2108']

['what was the net change in total debt from 2014 to 2015?', 'what was the value in 2014?', 'what is the percent change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs . these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries . borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 . commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding . effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s . was increased by $ 2.0 billion . as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion . we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements . sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions . these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse . the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets . we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing . pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions . the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively . the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows . for further details , see item 8 , note 23 . sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements . debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 . our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature . for further details , see item 8 , note 7 . indebtedness . the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 . see item 8 , note 16 . fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt . the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors . on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s . securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period . our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td></td><td>face value</td><td>interest rate</td><td>issuance</td><td>maturity</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>$ 500</td><td>1.250% ( 1.250 % )</td><td>august 2015</td><td>august 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>3.375% ( 3.375 % )</td><td>august 2015</td><td>august 2025</td></tr></table> in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs . these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries . borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 . commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding . effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s . was increased by $ 2.0 billion . as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion . we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements . sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions . these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse . the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets . we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing . pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions . the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively . the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows . for further details , see item 8 , note 23 . sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements . debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 . our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature . for further details , see item 8 , note 7 . indebtedness . the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 . see item 8 , note 16 . fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt . the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors . on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s . securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period . our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

['-1.0', '29.5', '-0.0339']

['what was the percentage of sq ft of the office in alpharette, georgia not leased as of 12/31/13?', 'at the same date, what was the ratio of sq ft of the alpharetta, georgia office to the one in jersey city, new jersey?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time . any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants , which could further restrict our business operations . in addition , any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in a reduction of our credit rating , which could harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness . if our cash flows and available cash are insufficient to meet our debt service obligations , we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations . we may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain the proceeds that we could realize from them , and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due . item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2013 is shown in the following table . all facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximate square footage</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alpharetta georgia</td><td>254000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>jersey city new jersey</td><td>107000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>arlington virginia</td><td>102000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sandy utah</td><td>66000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>menlo park california</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>new york new york</td><td>39000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>chicago illinois ( 1 )</td><td>36000</td></tr></table> chicago , illinois ( 1 ) 36000 ( 1 ) includes approximately 25000 square footage related to g1 execution services , llc . we entered into a definitive agreement to sell g1 execution services , llc to an affiliate of susquehanna . the lease was assigned to susquehanna upon closing of the sale on february 10 , all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet . we believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2014 . item 3 . legal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc . ( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara . ajaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets . following a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement . although the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief . on december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets . although the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a .

['0.64961', '2.37383']

['what was the change in net revenues between 12/28/12 and 12/29/13?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?', 'what was the percentage of impairment charges to net revenue in 2013?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows . md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview . discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a . 2022 critical accounting estimates . accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts . 2022 results of operations . an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources . an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity . 2022 fair value of financial instruments . discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments . 2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements . overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule . the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties . words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements . in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements . such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k . our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 . overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended sept . 282013</td><td>three months ended change</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended dec . 292012</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 13834</td><td>$ 13483</td><td>$ 351</td><td>$ 52708</td><td>$ 53341</td><td>$ -633 ( 633 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8571</td><td>$ 8414</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 31521</td><td>$ 33151</td><td>$ -1630 ( 1630 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>62.0% ( 62.0 % )</td><td>62.4% ( 62.4 % )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td><td>59.8% ( 59.8 % )</td><td>62.1% ( 62.1 % )</td><td>( 2.3 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 3549</td><td>$ 3504</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 12291</td><td>$ 14638</td><td>$ -2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 2625</td><td>$ 2950</td><td>$ -325 ( 325 )</td><td>$ 9620</td><td>$ 11005</td><td>$ -1385 ( 1385 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>$ 0.51</td><td>$ 0.58</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 1.89</td><td>$ 2.13</td><td>$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )</td></tr></table> revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 . pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization . dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year . higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 . in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities . these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 . table of contents .

['-633.0', '-0.01187', '0.00455']

['what was the operating income in 2017?', 'and what was it in 2016?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'what was the operating income in 2016?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2016 operating income, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: net revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan . these net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers . excluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 . in some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes . in 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories . excise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) . our cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , $</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 10432</td><td>$ 9391</td><td>$ 1041</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>marketing administration and research costs</td><td>6725</td><td>6405</td><td>320</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income</td><td>11503</td><td>10815</td><td>688</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td></tr></table> cost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) . marketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) . operating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) . interest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income . our effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) . the 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act . for further details , see item 8 , note 11 . income taxes to our consolidated financial statements . we are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability . based upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction . we are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions . it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties . an estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time . net earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) . this decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income . diluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) . excluding .

['11503.0', '10815.0', '688.0', '10815.0', '0.06362']

['what is the net cash from operating and investing activities?', 'what is the net cash from financing activities?', 'what is the total net cash flow?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3547</td><td>$ 3173</td><td>$ 4421</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td><td>-1518 ( 1518 )</td><td>-907 ( 907 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-3363 ( 3363 )</td><td>-1476 ( 1476 )</td><td>-3938 ( 3938 )</td></tr></table> operating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 . the increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 . partially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan . this reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts . operating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred . the improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 . these improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 . the decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas . the increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems . the decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments . net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 . the decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million . partially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million . the decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities . investing activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments . we also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure . capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 . we expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years . acquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates . amounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates . we paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 . in 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) . there were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 . during 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 . financing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million . of the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 . in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) . under the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . we repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases . in connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program . cash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million . those activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. .

['3228.0', '-3363.0', '-135.0']

['what was the minimum annual rental payment in 2011?', 'what was it in 2010?', 'what is the difference?', 'what is the percent change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: alexion pharmaceuticals , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases ( including facilities and equipment ) as of december 31 , 2007 are: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 4935</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>3144</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>3160</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>3200</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>2768</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>9934</td></tr></table> 9 . commitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16 , 2007 , pdl biopharma , inc. , or pdl , filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s . district court for the district of delaware . pdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris . pdl seeks unspecified damages , but no less than a reasonable royalty , plus attorney 2019s fees . alexion has denied pdl's claims . in addition , we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s . patents held by pdl . alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims . on february 4 , 2008 , sb2 , inc . filed a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california . sb2 , inc . claims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2 , inc . patents due to sales of soliris . sb2 , inc . seeks unspecified monetary damages , equitable relief and attorneys fees . alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims . the results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages . however , depending on the outcome of these legal matters , the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales ( see notes 2 , 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties ) . product supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18 , 2002 , or the lonza agreement , between lonza sales ag , or lonza , and us , relating to the manufacture of soliris , was amended in june 2007 . we amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $ 30000 to $ 35000 through 2013 . such commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances. .

['3200.0', '3160.0', '40.0', '0.01266']

['what is 45 times 4?', 'what is that plus the amortization cost in 2019?', 'what is the total cost divided by 5?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) asset divestitures in conjunction with the asset divestitures in 2013 and 2014 , devon removed $ 26 million and $ 706 million of goodwill , respectively , which were allocated to these assets . impairment devon 2019s canadian goodwill was originally recognized in 2001 as a result of a business combination consisting almost entirely of conventional gas assets that devon no longer owns . as a result of performing the goodwill impairment test described in note 1 , devon concluded the implied fair value of its canadian goodwill was zero as of december 31 , 2014 . this conclusion was largely based on the significant decline in benchmark oil prices , particularly after opec 2019s decision not to reduce its production targets that was announced in late november 2014 . consequently , in the fourth quarter of 2014 , devon wrote off its remaining canadian goodwill and recognized a $ 1.9 billion impairment . other intangible assets as of december 31 , 2014 , intangible assets associated with customer relationships had a gross carrying amount of $ 569 million and $ 36 million of accumulated amortization . the weighted-average amortization period for the customer relationships is 13.7 years . amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 . other intangible assets are reported in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the following table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years . year amortization amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amortization amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 45</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 45</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 45</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 45</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 44</td></tr></table> .

['180.0', '224.0', '44.8']

['what was the value of e*trade financial on 12/14?', 'what is that less an initial $100 investment?', 'what is the percent change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/09</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>90.91</td><td>45.23</td><td>50.85</td><td>111.59</td><td>137.81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.06</td><td>117.49</td><td>136.30</td><td>180.44</td><td>205.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones us financials index</td><td>100.00</td><td>112.72</td><td>98.24</td><td>124.62</td><td>167.26</td><td>191.67</td></tr></table> table of contents .

['137.81', '37.81', '0.3781']

['what was the change in the average of investments from 2014 to 2015?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that average in 2014, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the company had net realized capital losses for 2015 of $ 184.1 million . in 2015 , the company recorded $ 102.2 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities , $ 45.6 million of losses due to fair value re-measurements and $ 36.3 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities . in 2014 , net realized capital gains were $ 84.0 million due to $ 121.7 million of gains from fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 1.9 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 39.5 million of other-than- temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities . in 2013 , net realized capital gains were $ 300.2 million due to $ 258.9 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 42.4 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 1.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities . the company 2019s cash and invested assets totaled $ 17.7 billion at december 31 , 2015 , which consisted of 87.4% ( 87.4 % ) fixed maturities and cash , of which 91.4% ( 91.4 % ) were investment grade ; 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) equity securities and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) other invested assets . the average maturity of fixed maturity securities was 4.1 years at december 31 , 2015 , and their overall duration was 3.0 years . as of december 31 , 2015 , the company did not have any direct investments in commercial real estate or direct commercial mortgages or any material holdings of derivative investments ( other than equity index put option contracts as discussed in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data 201d - note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements ) or securities of issuers that are experiencing cash flow difficulty to an extent that the company 2019s management believes could threaten the issuer 2019s ability to meet debt service payments , except where other-than-temporary impairments have been recognized . the company 2019s investment portfolio includes structured commercial mortgage-backed securities ( 201ccmbs 201d ) with a book value of $ 264.9 million and a market value of $ 266.3 million . cmbs securities comprising more than 70% ( 70 % ) of the december 31 , 2015 market value are rated aaa by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc ( 201cstandard & poor 2019s 201d ) . furthermore , securities comprising more than 90% ( 90 % ) of the market value are rated investment grade by standard & poor 2019s . the following table reflects investment results for the company for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>december 31 , average investments ( 1 )</td><td>december 31 , pre-tax investment income ( 2 )</td><td>december 31 , pre-tax effective yield</td><td>december 31 , pre-tax realized net capital ( losses ) gains ( 3 )</td><td>december 31 , pre-tax unrealized net capital gains ( losses )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 17430.8</td><td>$ 473.8</td><td>2.72% ( 2.72 % )</td><td>$ -184.1 ( 184.1 )</td><td>$ -194.0 ( 194.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>16831.9</td><td>530.6</td><td>3.15% ( 3.15 % )</td><td>84.0</td><td>20.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>16472.5</td><td>548.5</td><td>3.33% ( 3.33 % )</td><td>300.2</td><td>-467.2 ( 467.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>16220.9</td><td>600.2</td><td>3.70% ( 3.70 % )</td><td>164.4</td><td>161.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>15680.9</td><td>620.0</td><td>3.95% ( 3.95 % )</td><td>6.9</td><td>106.6</td></tr></table> pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax realized net unrealized net average investment effective capital ( losses ) capital gains ( dollars in millions ) investments ( 1 ) income ( 2 ) yield gains ( 3 ) ( losses ) 17430.8$ 473.8$ 2.72% ( 2.72 % ) ( 184.1 ) $ ( 194.0 ) $ 16831.9 530.6 3.15% ( 3.15 % ) 84.0 20.3 16472.5 548.5 3.33% ( 3.33 % ) 300.2 ( 467.2 ) 16220.9 600.2 3.70% ( 3.70 % ) 164.4 161.0 15680.9 620.0 3.95% ( 3.95 % ) 6.9 106.6 ( 1 ) average of the beginning and ending carrying values of investments and cash , less net funds held , future policy benefit reserve , and non-interest bearing cash . bonds , common stock and redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stocks are carried at market value . common stock which are actively managed are carried at fair value . ( 2 ) after investment expenses , excluding realized net capital gains ( losses ) . ( 3 ) included in 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 are fair value re-measurements of ( $ 45.6 ) million , $ 121.7 million , $ 258.9 million , $ 118.1 million and ( $ 4.4 ) million , respectively. .

['598.9', '0.03558']

['what was the closing price of common stock as of 2/11/11?', 'and the high price for the quarter ended 12/31/10?', 'and the difference between these two prices?', 'so what was the growth rate during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2010</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 44.61</td><td>$ 40.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>45.33</td><td>38.86</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>52.11</td><td>43.70</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>53.14</td><td>49.61</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 32.53</td><td>$ 25.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>34.52</td><td>27.93</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>37.71</td><td>29.89</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>43.84</td><td>35.03</td></tr></table> on february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders . dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock . payment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status . in addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

['56.73', '53.14', '3.59', '0.06756']

['what was the total amount of cash outflow used for shares repurchased during november 2007, in millions of dollars?', 'and how much is that in dollars?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: page 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 ( e ) of cercla . the usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $ 4 million and $ 5 million . based on the information available to the company at the present time , the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity , results of operations or financial condition of the company . europe in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk , wine , fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages . ball packaging europe gmbh ( bpe ) , together with certain other plaintiffs , contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation ( verpackungsverordnung ) in federal and state administrative court . all other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases , together with minimal ancillary legal fees . the relevant industries , including bpe and its competitors , have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers , which has been operational since may 1 , 2006 , the date required under the deposit legislation . item 4 . submission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007 . part ii item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock ( bll ) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange . there were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3 , 2008 . common stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 . purchases of securities total number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total number of shares purchased ( a )</td><td>average pricepaid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 to october 28 2007</td><td>705292</td><td>$ 53.53</td><td>705292</td><td>4904824</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>october 29 to november 25 2007</td><td>431170</td><td>$ 48.11</td><td>431170</td><td>4473654</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>november 26 to december 31 2007</td><td>8310 ( c )</td><td>$ 44.99</td><td>8310</td><td>4465344</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1144772</td><td>$ 51.42</td><td>1144772</td><td></td></tr></table> ( a ) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities . ( b ) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors . on january 23 , 2008 , ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock . this repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations . ( c ) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7 , 2008 , for approximately $ 31 million . also does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7 , 2008. .

['20743588.7', '20.74359']

['what was the total number of shares purchased in november for the q4 ended 12/31/18?', 'as of 12/18, what was the percentage of the 2018 program still outstanding?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents tceq and harris county pollution control services department ( hcpcs ) ( houston terminal ) . we have an outstanding noe from the tceq and an outstanding vn from the hcpcs alleging excess emissions from tank 003 that occurred during hurricane harvey . we are working with the pertinent authorities to resolve these matters . item 4 . mine safety disclosures part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock trades on the nyse under the trading symbol 201cvlo . 201d as of january 31 , 2019 , there were 5271 holders of record of our common stock . dividends are considered quarterly by the board of directors , may be paid only when approved by the board , and will depend on our financial condition , results of operations , cash flows , prospects , industry conditions , capital requirements , and other factors and restrictions our board deems relevant . there can be no assurance that we will pay a dividend at the rates we have paid historically , or at all , in the future . the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2018 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2018</td><td>939957</td><td>$ 87.23</td><td>8826</td><td>931131</td><td>$ 2.7 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2018</td><td>3655945</td><td>$ 87.39</td><td>216469</td><td>3439476</td><td>$ 2.4 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2018</td><td>3077364</td><td>$ 73.43</td><td>4522</td><td>3072842</td><td>$ 2.2 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>7673266</td><td>$ 81.77</td><td>229817</td><td>7443449</td><td>$ 2.2 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2018 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2018 program ) , with no expiration date , which was in addition to the remaining amount available under a $ 2.5 billion program authorized on september 21 , 2016 ( the 2016 program ) . during the fourth quarter of 2018 , we completed our purchases under the 2016 program . as of december 31 , 2018 , we had $ 2.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2018 program. .

['0.47645', '0.88']

['what was the change in the balance of the prudential insurance company of america from 2016 to 2017?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that balance in 2016, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 15 . commitments and contingencies in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance and reinsurance agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that its positions are legally and commercially reasonable . the company considers the statuses of these proceedings when determining its reserves for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses . aside from litigation and arbitrations related to these insurance and reinsurance agreements , the company is not a party to any other material litigation or arbitration . the company has entered into separate annuity agreements with the prudential insurance of america ( 201cthe prudential 201d ) and an additional unaffiliated life insurance company in which the company has either purchased annuity contracts or become the assignee of annuity proceeds that are meant to settle claim payment obligations in the future . in both instances , the company would become contingently liable if either the prudential or the unaffiliated life insurance company were unable to make payments related to the respective annuity contract . the table below presents the estimated cost to replace all such annuities for which the company was contingently liable for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>at december 31 , 2017</td><td>at december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>the prudential insurance company of america</td><td>$ 144618</td><td>$ 146507</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unaffiliated life insurance company</td><td>34444</td><td>33860</td></tr></table> 16 . share-based compensation plans the company has a 2010 stock incentive plan ( 201c2010 employee plan 201d ) , a 2009 non-employee director stock option and restricted stock plan ( 201c2009 director plan 201d ) and a 2003 non-employee director equity compensation plan ( 201c2003 director plan 201d ) . under the 2010 employee plan , 4000000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as non- qualified share options , incentive share options , share appreciation rights , restricted share awards or performance share unit awards to officers and key employees of the company . at december 31 , 2017 , there were 2553473 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2010 employee plan . the 2010 employee plan replaced a 2002 employee plan , which replaced a 1995 employee plan ; therefore , no further awards will be granted under the 2002 employee plan or the 1995 employee plan . through december 31 , 2017 , only non-qualified share options , restricted share awards and performance share unit awards had been granted under the employee plans . under the 2009 director plan , 37439 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or restricted share awards to non-employee directors of the company . at december 31 , 2017 , there were 34957 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2009 director plan . the 2009 director plan replaced a 1995 director plan , which expired . under the 2003 director plan , 500000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or share awards to non-employee directors of the company . at december 31 , 2017 there were 346714 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2003 director plan. .

['-1889.0', '-0.01289']

['what was the ratio of the 2016 hedged gallons to 2017?', 'what was the change in the aggregate fair values of outstanding fuel hedge between 2014 and 2015?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 . financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices . these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) . the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>gallons hedged</td><td>weighted average contractprice per gallon</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>27000000</td><td>$ 3.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>12000000</td><td>2.92</td></tr></table> if the national u.s . on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty . if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty . the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) . the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were current liabilities of $ 37.8 million and $ 34.4 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets . the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 respectively , and a gain of less than $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income . total ( loss ) gain recognized in other comprehensive ( loss ) income for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ ( 2.0 ) million , $ ( 24.2 ) million and $ 2.4 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated cardboard and old newspaper . from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities . we had no outstanding recycling commodity hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 . no amounts were recognized in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income for the ineffective portion of the changes in fair values during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income for recycling commodity hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 0.1 million and $ ( 0.1 ) million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . no amount was recognized in other comprehensive income for 2015 . fair value measurements in measuring fair values of assets and liabilities , we use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs ( level 1 ) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) . we also use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability , including assumptions about risk when appropriate. .

['2.25', '3.4', '0.09884']

['what was the total in raw materials and supplies in 2018?', 'and what was it in 2017?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'what was the total in raw materials and supplies in 2017?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2017 total, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s . other inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method . fifo cost approximates current replacement cost . inventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market . inventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value . inventories at december 31 consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished products</td><td>$ 988.1</td><td>$ 1211.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>work in process</td><td>2628.2</td><td>2697.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>raw materials and supplies</td><td>506.5</td><td>488.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total ( approximates replacement cost )</td><td>4122.8</td><td>4397.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>increase ( reduction ) to lifo cost</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td><td>60.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 4111.8</td><td>$ 4458.3</td></tr></table> inventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . note 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments . wholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required . we seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance . a large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions . we monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations . major financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities . in accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer . we are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings . we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents . the cost of these investments approximates fair value . our equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense . 2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer . any change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense . 2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value . any change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense . we review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis . our derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged . management reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .

['506.5', '488.8', '17.7', '488.8', '0.03621']

['what were investment banking fees in 2007?', 'what were they in 2006?', 'what is the difference of the 2007 value less that in 2006?', 'what is the net change divided by the 2006 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report 31 the following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2007 . factors that relate primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment than they are in this consolidated sec- tion . for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 96 201398 of this annual report . revenue . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment banking fees</td><td>$ 6635</td><td>$ 5520</td><td>$ 4088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>principal transactions</td><td>9015</td><td>10778</td><td>8072</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lending & deposit-related fees</td><td>3938</td><td>3468</td><td>3389</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset management administration and commissions</td><td>14356</td><td>11855</td><td>9988</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>securities gains ( losses )</td><td>164</td><td>-543 ( 543 )</td><td>-1336 ( 1336 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>mortgage fees and related income</td><td>2118</td><td>591</td><td>1054</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card income</td><td>6911</td><td>6913</td><td>6754</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other income</td><td>1829</td><td>2175</td><td>2684</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noninterest revenue</td><td>44966</td><td>40757</td><td>34693</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net interest income</td><td>26406</td><td>21242</td><td>19555</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net revenue</td><td>$ 71372</td><td>$ 61999</td><td>$ 54248</td></tr></table> 2007 compared with 2006 total net revenue of $ 71.4 billion was up $ 9.4 billion , or 15% ( 15 % ) , from the prior year . higher net interest income , very strong private equity gains , record asset management , administration and commissions revenue , higher mortgage fees and related income and record investment banking fees contributed to the revenue growth . these increases were offset partially by lower trading revenue . investment banking fees grew in 2007 to a level higher than the pre- vious record set in 2006 . record advisory and equity underwriting fees drove the results , partially offset by lower debt underwriting fees . for a further discussion of investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see the ib segment results on pages 40 201342 of this annual report . principal transactions revenue consists of trading revenue and private equity gains . trading revenue declined significantly from the 2006 level , primarily due to markdowns in ib of $ 1.4 billion ( net of hedges ) on subprime positions , including subprime cdos , and $ 1.3 billion ( net of fees ) on leveraged lending funded loans and unfunded commitments . also in ib , markdowns in securitized products on nonsubprime mortgages and weak credit trading performance more than offset record revenue in currencies and strong revenue in both rates and equities . equities benefited from strong client activity and record trading results across all products . ib 2019s credit portfolio results increased compared with the prior year , primarily driven by higher revenue from risk management activities . the increase in private equity gains from 2006 reflected a significantly higher level of gains , the classification of certain private equity carried interest as compensation expense and a fair value adjustment in the first quarter of 2007 on nonpublic private equity investments resulting from the adoption of sfas 157 ( 201cfair value measurements 201d ) . for a further discussion of principal transactions revenue , see the ib and corporate segment results on pages 40 201342 and 59 201360 , respectively , and note 6 on page 122 of this annual report . lending & deposit-related fees rose from the 2006 level , driven pri- marily by higher deposit-related fees and the bank of new york transaction . for a further discussion of lending & deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in rfs , tss and cb , see the rfs segment results on pages 43 201348 , the tss segment results on pages 54 201355 , and the cb segment results on pages 52 201353 of this annual report . asset management , administration and commissions revenue reached a level higher than the previous record set in 2006 . increased assets under management and higher performance and placement fees in am drove the record results . the 18% ( 18 % ) growth in assets under management from year-end 2006 came from net asset inflows and market appreciation across all segments : institutional , retail , private bank and private client services . tss also contributed to the rise in asset management , administration and commissions revenue , driven by increased product usage by new and existing clients and market appreciation on assets under custody . finally , commissions revenue increased , due mainly to higher brokerage transaction volume ( primarily included within fixed income and equity markets revenue of ib ) , which more than offset the sale of the insurance business by rfs in the third quarter of 2006 and a charge in the first quarter of 2007 resulting from accelerated surrenders of customer annuities . for additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for ib on pages 40 201342 , rfs on pages 43 201348 , tss on pages 54 201355 , and am on pages 56 201358 , of this annual report . the favorable variance resulting from securities gains in 2007 compared with securities losses in 2006 was primarily driven by improvements in the results of repositioning of the treasury invest- ment securities portfolio . also contributing to the positive variance was a $ 234 million gain from the sale of mastercard shares . for a fur- ther discussion of securities gains ( losses ) , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s treasury business , see the corporate segment discussion on pages 59 201360 of this annual report . consol idated results of operat ions .

['6635.0', '5520.0', '1115.0', '0.20199']

['what is the net change in the value of commodities from 2016 to 2017?', 'what is the percent change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in the tables above : 2030 the gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral netting , and therefore are not representative of the firm 2019s exposure . 2030 counterparty netting is reflected in each level to the extent that receivable and payable balances are netted within the same level and is included in counterparty netting in levels . where the counterparty netting is across levels , the netting is included in cross-level counterparty netting . 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts . significant unobservable inputs the table below presents the amount of level 3 assets ( liabilities ) , and ranges , averages and medians of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives . level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december $ in millions 2017 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2017</td><td>level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates net</td><td>$ -410 ( 410 )</td><td>$ -381 ( 381 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>correlation</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % ) to 95% ( 95 % ) ( 71%/79% ( 71%/79 % ) )</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % ) to 86% ( 86 % ) ( 56%/60% ( 56%/60 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility ( bps )</td><td>31 to 150 ( 84/78 )</td><td>31 to 151 ( 84/57 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit net</td><td>$ 1505</td><td>$ 2504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>correlation</td><td>28% ( 28 % ) to 84% ( 84 % ) ( 61%/60% ( 61%/60 % ) )</td><td>35% ( 35 % ) to 91% ( 91 % ) ( 65%/68% ( 65%/68 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit spreads ( bps )</td><td>1 to 633 ( 69/42 )</td><td>1 to 993 ( 122/73 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>upfront credit points</td><td>0 to 97 ( 42/38 )</td><td>0 to 100 ( 43/35 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>recovery rates</td><td>22% ( 22 % ) to 73% ( 73 % ) ( 68%/73% ( 68%/73 % ) )</td><td>1% ( 1 % ) to 97% ( 97 % ) ( 58%/70% ( 58%/70 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>currencies net</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>correlation</td><td>49% ( 49 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 61%/62% ( 61%/62 % ) )</td><td>25% ( 25 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) ( 50%/55% ( 50%/55 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>commodities net</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 73</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>volatility</td><td>9% ( 9 % ) to 79% ( 79 % ) ( 24%/24% ( 24%/24 % ) )</td><td>13% ( 13 % ) to 68% ( 68 % ) ( 33%/33% ( 33%/33 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>natural gas spread</td><td>$ ( 2.38 ) to $ 3.34 ( $ ( 0.22 ) /$ ( 0.12 ) )</td><td>$ ( 1.81 ) to $ 4.33 ( $ ( 0.14 ) /$ ( 0.05 ) )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>oil spread</td><td>$ ( 2.86 ) to $ 23.61 ( $ 6.47/$ 2.35 )</td><td>$ ( 19.72 ) to $ 64.92 ( $ 25.30/$ 16.43 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>equities net</td><td>$ -1249 ( 1249 )</td><td>$ -3416 ( 3416 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>correlation</td><td>( 36 ) % ( % ) to 94% ( 94 % ) ( 50%/52% ( 50%/52 % ) )</td><td>( 39 ) % ( % ) to 88% ( 88 % ) ( 41%/41% ( 41%/41 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>volatility</td><td>4% ( 4 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/22% ( 24%/22 % ) )</td><td>5% ( 5 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/23% ( 24%/23 % ) )</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts . 2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative . 2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments . an average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average . for example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range . 2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative . for example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative . accordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives . 2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models . 2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques . for example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value . therefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques . 2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation . 2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas . 2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products . range of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation . ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions . generally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type . 2030 volatility . ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices . for example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks . 2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates . the ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) . the broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs . 130 goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k .

['-26.0', '-0.35616']

['what is the net change in loews common stock from 2013 to 2014?', 'what is the percent change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loews common stock</td><td>100.0</td><td>97.37</td><td>106.04</td><td>126.23</td><td>110.59</td><td>101.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.45</td><td>156.82</td><td>178.29</td><td>180.75</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loews peer group ( a )</td><td>100.0</td><td>101.59</td><td>115.19</td><td>145.12</td><td>152.84</td><td>144.70</td></tr></table> ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

['-15.64', '-0.1239']

['what was the total of payments for entergy arkansas, in millions?', 'and what was it for entergy louisiana?', 'what was, then, the difference between them?', 'and what was the entergy louisiana amount as a percent of the entergy arkansas one?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>$ 6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>( $ 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>( $ 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>( $ 3 )</td></tr></table> in september 2016 the ferc accepted the february 2016 compliance filing subject to a further compliance filing made in november 2016 . the further compliance filing was required as a result of an order issued in september 2016 ruling on the january 2016 rehearing requests filed by the lpsc , the apsc , and entergy . in the order addressing the rehearing requests , the ferc granted the lpsc 2019s rehearing request and directed that interest be calculated on the payment/receipt amounts . the ferc also granted the apsc 2019s and entergy 2019s rehearing request and ordered the removal of both securitized asset accumulated deferred income taxes and contra-securitization accumulated deferred income taxes from the calculation . in november 2016 , entergy submitted its compliance filing in response to the ferc 2019s order on rehearing . the compliance filing included a revised refund calculation of the true-up payments and receipts based on 2009 test year data and interest calculations . the lpsc protested the interest calculations . in november 2017 the ferc issued an order rejecting the november 2016 compliance filing . the ferc determined that the payments detailed in the november 2016 compliance filing did not include adequate interest for the payments from entergy arkansas to entergy louisiana because it did not include interest on the principal portion of the payment that was made in february 2016 . in december 2017 , entergy recalculated the interest pursuant to the november 2017 order . as a result of the recalculations , entergy arkansas owed very minor payments to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans . 2011 rate filing based on calendar year 2010 production costs in may 2011 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2011 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in july a02011 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a01 , a02011 , a0subject to refund . after an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2011 rate filing with the 2012 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures . see discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding . 2012 rate filing based on calendar year 2011 production costs in may 2012 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2012 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in august 2012 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a02012 , a0subject to refund . after an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2012 rate filing with the 2011 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures . see discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding . 2013 rate filing based on calendar year 2012 production costs in may 2013 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2013 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . the city council intervened and filed comments related to including the outcome of a related ferc proceeding in the 2013 cost equalization calculation . in august 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the 2013 rates , effective june 1 , 2013 , subject to refund . after an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2013 rate filing with the 2011 , 2012 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures . entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements .

['6.0', '2.0', '4.0', '0.33333']

['in 2013, what was the ratio of sales to operating income?', 'and in 2012?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: equipment and energy . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 451.1</td><td>$ 420.1</td><td>$ 400.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>65.5</td><td>44.6</td><td>62.8</td></tr></table> 2013 vs . 2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity . operating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity . the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september 2012 . it is expected that approximately $ 250 of the backlog will be completed during 2014 . 2012 vs . 2011 sales of $ 420.1 increased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 19.5 , reflecting higher air separation unit ( asu ) activity . operating income of $ 44.6 decreased 29% ( 29 % ) , or $ 18.2 , reflecting lower lng project activity . the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2012 was $ 450 , compared to $ 334 at 30 september 2011 . other operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses . also included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments . other also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 . 2013 vs . 2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year . the current year includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 . the prior year loss included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10 . 2012 vs . 2011 other operating loss was $ 6.6 , compared to $ 39.3 in the prior year , primarily due to a reduction in stranded costs , a decrease in the lifo adjustment as a result of decreases in inventory values , and favorable foreign exchange , partially offset by gains on asset sales in the prior year. .

['6.88702', '9.41928']

['how much did net revenue change between 2015 and 2016?', 'and the percentage change during this time?', 'what were nuclear fuel expenses as a percentage of 2016 net revenue?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-149 ( 149 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rhode island state energy center</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nuclear fuel expenses</td><td>68</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1542</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue . the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 . see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

['124.0', '0.08042', '0.0441']

['what were the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis in 2012?', 'and what were the capital expenditures on a gaap basis in that same year?', 'how much, then, do the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis represent in relation to the ones on a gaap basis, in 2012?', 'and what is the difference between this value and the number one?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: investing activities for the year ended 30 september 2014 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1638.0 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment . for the year ended 30 september 2013 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1697.0 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment and acquisitions . for the year ended 30 september 2012 , cash used for investing activities was $ 2435.2 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment , acquisitions , and investments in unconsolidated affiliates . refer to the capital expenditures section below for additional detail . capital expenditures capital expenditures are detailed in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions to plant and equipment</td><td>$ 1684.2</td><td>$ 1524.2</td><td>$ 1521.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisitions less cash acquired</td><td>2014</td><td>224.9</td><td>863.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-1.3 ( 1.3 )</td><td>175.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capital expenditures on a gaap basis</td><td>$ 1682.2</td><td>$ 1747.8</td><td>$ 2559.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>capital lease expenditures ( a )</td><td>202.4</td><td>234.9</td><td>212.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>purchase of noncontrolling interests in asubsidiary ( a )</td><td>.5</td><td>14.0</td><td>6.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis</td><td>$ 1885.1</td><td>$ 1996.7</td><td>$ 2778.3</td></tr></table> ( a ) we utilize a non-gaap measure in the computation of capital expenditures and include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases and purchases of noncontrolling interests . certain contracts associated with facilities that are built to provide product to a specific customer are required to be accounted for as leases , and such spending is reflected as a use of cash within cash provided by operating activities , if the arrangement qualifies as a capital lease . additionally , the payment for subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary is accounted for as an equity transaction and will be reflected as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows . the presentation of this non-gaap measure is intended to enhance the usefulness of information by providing a measure that our management uses internally to evaluate and manage our expenditures . capital expenditures on a gaap basis in 2014 totaled $ 1682.2 , compared to $ 1747.8 in 2013 . the decrease of $ 65.6 was primarily due to the acquisitions in 2013 . additions to plant and equipment are largely in support of the merchant gases and tonnage gases businesses . additions to plant and equipment also included support capital of a routine , ongoing nature , including expenditures for distribution equipment and facility improvements . spending in 2014 and 2013 included plant and equipment constructed to provide oxygen for coal gasification in china , hydrogen to the global market , and renewable energy in the u.k . in 2013 , we completed three acquisitions with an aggregate cash use , net of cash acquired , of $ 224.9 . in the fourth quarter , we acquired an air separation unit and integrated gases liquefier in guiyang , china . during the third quarter , we acquired epco , the largest independent u.s . producer of liquid carbon dioxide ( co2 ) , and wcg . in 2012 , we acquired a controlling stake in indura s.a . for $ 690 and e.i . dupont de nemours and co. , inc . 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) interest in our joint venture , da nanomaterials for $ 147 . we also purchased a 25% ( 25 % ) equity interest in abdullah hashim industrial gases & equipment co . ltd . ( ahg ) , an unconsolidated affiliate , for $ 155 . refer to note 5 , business combinations , and note 7 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates , to the consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding the acquisitions and the investments . capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis in 2014 totaled $ 1885.1 compared to $ 1996.7 in 2013 . capital lease expenditures of $ 202.4 decreased by $ 32.5 , reflecting lower project spending . 2015 outlook excluding acquisitions , capital expenditures for new plant and equipment in 2015 on a gaap basis are expected to be between $ 1650 and $ 1800 , and on a non-gaap basis are expected to be between $ 1700 and $ 1900 . the non-gaap capital expenditures include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases , which are expected to be between $ 50 and $ 100 . a majority of the total capital expenditures is expected to be for new plants . it is anticipated that capital expenditures will be funded principally with cash from continuing operations . in addition , we intend to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and investments in equity affiliates . financing activities for the year ended 2014 , cash used by financing activities was $ 504.3 primarily attributable to cash used to pay dividends of $ 627.7 , which was partially offset by proceeds from stock option exercises of $ 141.6 . our borrowings ( short- and long-term proceeds , net of repayments ) were a net source of cash ( issuance ) of $ 1.1 and included $ 148.7 of net commercial paper and other short-term debt issuances , debt proceeds from the issuance of a .

['2778.3', '2559.8', '1.08536', '0.08536']

['what is the net change in the price for pmi common stock from 2013 to 2018?', 'what is that change over 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi peer group ( 1 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 97.90</td><td>$ 107.80</td><td>$ 113.70</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 111.00</td><td>$ 116.80</td><td>$ 115.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>$ 120.50</td><td>$ 118.40</td><td>$ 129.00</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>$ 144.50</td><td>$ 140.50</td><td>$ 157.20</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2018</td><td>$ 96.50</td><td>$ 127.70</td><td>$ 150.30</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

['-3.5', '-0.035']

['as of december 31, 2003, what was the total amount of long-term debt due in the years of 2004 and 2005, in thousands?', 'what is that in millions?', 'and including the long-term debt due in 2006, what then becomes that total amount?', 'how much is this three year amount in millions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds . ( b ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed . ( c ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2004 and can then be remarketed . ( d ) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1 , 2003 . entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders , pursuant to the mandatory tender provision , and has not remarketed the bonds at this time . entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds . ( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st . charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 . ( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed . ( g ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( h ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2003 , for the next five years are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 503215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 462420</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 75896</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624539</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 941625</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above . in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur. .

['965635.0', '965.635', '1041531.0', '1041.531']

['what was the average individual price of the shares used in the acquisition of suros?', 'and what was the total acquisition price in that transaction?', 'what percentage of this price was dedicated to goodwill?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operation . there have no other material changes to the purchase price allocation as disclosed in the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 30 , 2006 . as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values . customer relationship represents r2 2019s strong active customer base , dominant market position and strong partnership with several large companies . trade name represents the r2 product names that the company intends to continue to use . order backlog consists of customer orders for which revenue has not yet been recognized . developed technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to resell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products . the estimated $ 10200 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects primarily related to r2 2019s digital cad products . the projects added direct digital algorithm capabilities as well as a new platform technology to analyze images and breast density measurement . the projects were substantially completed as planned in fiscal 2007 . the deferred income tax asset relates to the tax effect of acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable partially offset by acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes . acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc . on july 27 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc . ( suros ) , pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 17 , 2006 . the results of operations for suros have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment . suros , located in indianapolis , indiana , develops , manufactures and sells minimally invasive interventional breast biopsy technology and products for biopsy , tissue removal and biopsy site marking . the initial aggregate purchase price for suros of approximately $ 248100 ( subject to adjustment ) consisted of 2300 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 106500 , cash paid of $ 139000 , and approximately $ 2600 for acquisition related fees and expenses . the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no . 99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination . the components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>net tangible assets acquired as of july 27 2006</td><td>$ 11800</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>in-process research and development</td><td>4900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>developed technology and know how</td><td>46000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>customer relationship</td><td>17900</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trade name</td><td>5800</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-21300 ( 21300 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill</td><td>202000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated purchase price</td><td>$ 267100</td></tr></table> the acquisition also provides for a two-year earn out . the earn-out is payable in two annual cash installments equal to the incremental revenue growth in suros 2019 business in the two years following the closing. .

['46.30435', '267100.0', '0.75627']

['what was reporting operating profit in 2018?', 'what was it in 2017?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is the percent change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: divestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by two percent . net sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware . net sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products . net sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products . our gross profit margins were 32.2 percent , 34.2 percent and 33.4 percent in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the 2018 gross profit margin was negatively impacted by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler , an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs and salaries ) and unfavorable sales mix . these negative impacts were partially offset by an increase in net selling prices , the benefits associated with cost savings initiatives , and increased sales volume . the 2017 gross profit margin was positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 17.7 percent in 2018 compared with 18.6 percent in 2017 and 18.7 percent in 2016 . the decrease in selling , general and administrative expenses , as a percentage of sales , was driven by leverage of fixed expenses , due primarily to increased sales volume , and improved cost control . the following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating profit as reported</td><td>$ 1211</td><td>$ 1194</td><td>$ 1087</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>rationalization charges</td><td>14</td><td>4</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kichler inventory step up adjustment</td><td>40</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating profit as adjusted</td><td>$ 1265</td><td>$ 1198</td><td>$ 1109</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating profit margins as reported</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>15.6% ( 15.6 % )</td><td>14.8% ( 14.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating profit margins as adjusted</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td><td>15.7% ( 15.7 % )</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td></tr></table> operating profit margin in 2018 was negatively affected by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler and an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs , salaries and erp costs ) . these negative impacts were partially offset by increased net selling prices , benefits associated with cost savings initiatives and increased sales volume . operating profit margin in 2017 was positively impacted by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs . operating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count . due to the recently-announced increase in tariffs on imported materials from china , and assuming tariffs rise to 25 percent in 2019 , we could be exposed to approximately $ 150 million of potential annual direct cost increases . we will work to mitigate the impact of these tariffs through a combination of price increases , supplier negotiations , supply chain repositioning and other internal productivity measures . other income ( expense ) , net other , net , for 2018 included $ 14 million of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost and $ 8 million of realized foreign currency losses . these expenses were partially offset by $ 3 million of earnings related to equity method investments and $ 1 million related to distributions from private equity funds . other , net , for 2017 included $ 26 million related to periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs , $ 13 million net loss related to the divestitures of moores and arrow and $ 2 million related to the impairment of a private equity fund , partially offset by $ 3 million related to distributions from private equity funds and $ 1 million of earnings related to equity method investments. .

['1211.0', '1194.0', '17.0', '0.01424']

['what was the operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net sales in 2003?', 'and what was it in 2001?', 'by what amount, then, did it change over the years?', 'and what was this change but for the operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales, in the same period?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k the following table sets forth the operating profit margin by cost of products sold . included in cost of product sold are segment for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , losses on foreign exchange hedge contracts , which increased 2002 and 2001 : in 2003 relative to 2002 . in the fourth quarter , the company reported operating profit as a percent of net sales of percent of net sales 47.1 percent for asia pacific. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31,</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>americas</td><td>51.2% ( 51.2 % )</td><td>48.3% ( 48.3 % )</td><td>47.4% ( 47.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>europe</td><td>26.3</td><td>24.4</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia pacific</td><td>45.3</td><td>46.1</td><td>45.4</td></tr></table> operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net sales increased to 48.3 percent in 2002 from 47.4 percent in year ended december 31 , 2003 2001 , reflecting improved gross profit margins due to higher compared to year ended december 31 , 2002 average selling prices and increased sales of higher margin operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net products , and lower selling expenses as a percent of sales sales increased due to improved gross margins driven by due to lower costs associated with the u.s . distributor higher average selling prices and increased sales of higher network . the americas continued to invest in strategic margin products , leveraged operating expenses and the initiatives such as mis technologies , field sales personnel , favorable impact of the change in accounting principle for medical education programs and new product launches . instruments . the change in accounting principle for operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of net instruments increased operating profit by 1.7 percentage sales increased to 46.1 percent in 2002 from 45.4 percent points . with respect to sales growth , increased zimmer in 2001 . this increase reflects lower selling , general and standalone average selling prices of 4 percent in 2003 and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in japan as favorable effects of volume and mix , 15 percent increase in a result of a sales force and dealer reorganization , partially 2003 , represent the most significant factors in improved offset by lower gross profit margins as a result of lower yen operating profit in the americas . as reconstructive implant hedge gains compared to 2001 . sales grow at a higher rate than trauma and orthopaedic operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales surgical products , operating profit margins generally tend to increased to 24.4 percent in 2002 from 19.5 percent in 2001 , improve since reconstructive product sales generally earn due to improved gross profit margins as a result of higher higher gross margins . this was the case in 2003 , with zimmer average selling prices and favorable product and country mix , standalone reconstructive implant sales growth of 22 percent the leveraging of sales growth in europe on controlled as compared with total zimmer standalone sales growth of increases in operating expenses and improved efficiency 19 percent . in the fourth quarter , the company reported in the utilization of instruments ( more frequent use of operating profit as a percent of net sales of 50.4 percent for instruments resulted in fewer placements and less expense ) . the americas . operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales liquidity and capital resources increased due to improved gross profit margins driven by cash flows provided by operations were $ 494.8 million higher zimmer standalone average selling prices and in 2003 , compared with $ 220.2 million in 2002 . the principal favorable product and country mix , leveraged operating source of cash was net earnings before cumulative effect of expenses and the favorable impact of the change in change in accounting principle of $ 291.2 million . non-cash accounting principle for instruments . the change in expenses for the period included depreciation and accounting for instruments increased operating profit by amortization expense of $ 103.3 million , centerpulse inventory 1.4 percentage points . increases in zimmer standalone step-up of $ 42.7 million and centerpulse in-process research average selling prices in europe of 2 percent in 2003 and the and development write-offs of $ 11.2 million . working capital effect of volume and mix , 19 percent increase in 2003 , were management , together with the collection of $ 20.0 million of the key factors in improved operating profit . also cash related to centerpulse tax loss carryforwards , contributing to the improvement was significantly lower contributed $ 80.4 million to operating cash flow . growth in operating expenses . in the fourth quarter , the working capital continues to be a key management focus . company reported operating profit as a percent of net sales at december 31 , 2003 , the company had 62 days of sales of 24.7 percent for europe . outstanding in accounts receivable , unfavorable to the prior operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of year by 10 days . acquired centerpulse businesses had a net sales decreased primarily due to less favorable rates on negative impact of 10 days , due to centerpulse 2019s business hedge contracts during the year compared to the prior year , mix which has a greater proportion of european revenue with partially offset by increased zimmer standalone average payment terms generally longer than those in the u.s . at selling prices and leveraged operating expenses . the change december 31 , 2003 , the company had 232 days of inventory in accounting for instruments had an immaterial effect on on hand compared to 247 days reported at the end of 2002 . operating profit for asia pacific . increases in zimmer the reduction was principally due to improved inventory standalone average selling prices in asia pacific of 1 percent management and the acquired dental and spinal businesses and volume and mix improvements of 4 percent in 2003 carrying fewer days of inventory . contributed modest improvement but was offset by higher .

['51.2', '47.4', '3.8', '6.8']

['what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 from 2012 to 2017?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2012, in percentage?', 'what was the change in the performance value of the s&p 500 retail index from 2012 to 2017?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance value in 2012, in percentage?', 'what is, then, the difference between the s&p 500 percentage change and the s&p 500 retail index one?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/29/2012</td><td>12/28/2013</td><td>12/27/2014</td><td>12/26/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/30/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tractor supply company</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 174.14</td><td>$ 181.29</td><td>$ 201.04</td><td>$ 179.94</td><td>$ 180.52</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 134.11</td><td>$ 155.24</td><td>$ 156.43</td><td>$ 173.74</td><td>$ 211.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 147.73</td><td>$ 164.24</td><td>$ 207.15</td><td>$ 219.43</td><td>$ 286.13</td></tr></table> .

['111.67', '1.1167', '186.13', '1.8613', '0.7446']

['what was the final aggregate purchase price of all towers, in millions of dollars?', 'and how much is that in dollars?', 'what was, then, the average price paid for each tower?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 15.5 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 19.8 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . uganda acquisition 2014on december 8 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with mtn group to establish a joint venture in uganda . the joint venture is controlled by a holding company of which a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( the 201catc uganda subsidiary 201d ) holds a 51% ( 51 % ) interest and a wholly owned subsidiary of mtn group ( the 201cmtn uganda subsidiary 201d ) holds a 49% ( 49 % ) interest . the joint venture is managed and controlled by the company and owns a tower operations company in uganda . pursuant to the agreement , the joint venture agreed to purchase a total of up to 1000 existing communications sites from mtn group 2019s operating subsidiary in uganda , subject to customary closing conditions . on june 29 , 2012 , the joint venture acquired 962 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 171.5 million , subject to post-closing adjustments . the aggregate purchase price was subsequently increased to $ 173.2 million , subject to future post-closing adjustments . under the terms of the purchase agreement , legal title to certain of these communications sites will be transferred upon fulfillment of certain conditions by mtn group . prior to the fulfillment of these conditions , the company will operate and maintain control of these communications sites , and accordingly , reflect these sites in the allocation of purchase price and the consolidated operating results . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase price consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>preliminary purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>$ 2258</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>102366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>63500</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-7528 ( 7528 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 160596</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>12564</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 36.5 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 27.0 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be not be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . germany acquisition 2014on november 14 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase communications sites from e-plus mobilfunk gmbh & co . kg . on december 4 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 2031 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 525.7 million. .

['173.2', '173200000.0', '180041.58004']

['what is 1000 times the number of votes from class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding in 2017?', 'what is that times 1?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 14 . capital stock shares outstanding . the following table presents information regarding capital stock: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>class a common stock authorized</td><td>1000000</td><td>1000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a common stock issued and outstanding</td><td>339235</td><td>338240</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>0.6</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>class b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>0.4</td><td>0.4</td></tr></table> cme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding . associated trading rights . members of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents . each class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme . a cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group . the class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below . trading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships . members of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits . core rights . holders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares . these core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections . votes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class . each class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share . the approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights . holders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights . voting rights . with the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required . in these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share . transfer restrictions . each class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group . these transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights . election of directors . the cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members . holders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders . the remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. .

['1300.0', '1300.0']

['what was the total of contingent payments related to impella?', 'and concerning the state tax settlement, what was its total due payment, in millions?', 'considering the number of years over which it was to be paid, what was its annual average cost?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 14 . income taxes ( continued ) on april 1 , 2007 , the company adopted financial interpretation fin no . 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 ( 201cfin no . 48 201d ) , which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes . fin no . 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return . fin no . 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure , and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized . as a result of its adoption of fin no . 48 , the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $ 0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1 , 2007 . this adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31 , 2003 , 2004 , and 2005 . the company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan , which it completed in fiscal year 2009 . the company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations . as of march 31 , 2009 , the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31 , 2008 . as such , the company had no fin no . 48 liability at march 31 , 2009 . on a quarterly basis , the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest . it is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months ; however , it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits , excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at march 31 2008</td><td>$ 168</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-168 ( 168 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance at march 31 2009</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> the company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s . federal income tax , as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions . the company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981 . all tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions , including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts . however , since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income , those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized . note 15 . commitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows : 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device , a payment of $ 5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device , a payment of $ 5583333 , and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide , a payment of $ 5583334 . the two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31 , 2009 . in april 2009 , the company received fda 510 ( k ) clearance of its impella 5.0 product , triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device . in may 2009 , the company paid $ 1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock. .

['16750002.0', '168.0', '56.0']

['what portion of the long-term debt is reported under the current liabilities section of the balance sheet as of 9/28/08?', 'what portion of the total contractual obligations are due within the next year?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: as a result of our acquisition of third wave on july 24 , 2008 , we assumed certain operating leases , the most significant of which is related to their corporate facility in madison , wisconsin , which is effective through september 2014 . future lease payments on these operating leases were approximately $ 5.8 million as of september 27 , 2008 . additionally , we assumed several license agreements for certain patent rights . these payments will be made through 2011 and future payments under these license agreements are approximately $ 7.0 million as of september 27 , 2008 . contractual obligations . the following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of september 27 , 2008: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period more than 5 years</td><td>payments due by period total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 38480</td><td>$ 109436</td><td>$ 327400</td><td>$ 1725584</td><td>$ 2200900</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest on long-term debt obligations</td><td>58734</td><td>110973</td><td>90433</td><td>7484</td><td>267624</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>18528</td><td>33162</td><td>27199</td><td>63616</td><td>142505</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( 1 )</td><td>33176</td><td>15703</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>48879</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>financing leases</td><td>2408</td><td>5035</td><td>5333</td><td>15008</td><td>27784</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term supply contracts ( 2 )</td><td>3371</td><td>6000</td><td>3750</td><td>2014</td><td>13121</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>private equity investment ( 3 )</td><td>1874</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>1874</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 156571</td><td>$ 280309</td><td>$ 454115</td><td>$ 1811692</td><td>$ 2702687</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) approximately $ 6.4 million of the purchase obligations relates to an exclusive distribution and service agreement in the united states under which we will sell and service a line of extremity mri systems . pursuant to the terms of this contract , we have certain minimum inventory purchase obligations for the initial term of eighteen months . thereafter the purchase obligations are subject to renegotiation in the event of any unforeseen changes in the market dynamics . ( 2 ) as a result of the merger with cytyc , we assumed on a consolidated basis certain non-cancelable supply contracts . for reasons of quality assurance , sole source availability or cost effectiveness , certain key components and raw materials are available only from a sole supplier . to assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability , long-term supply contracts have been executed with these suppliers . in certain of these contracts , a minimum purchase commitment has been established . ( 3 ) as a result of the merger with cytyc , we assumed a private equity investment commitment with a limited liability partnership , which could be paid over the succeeding three years . the amounts above do not include any amount that may be payable to biolucent and adiana for earn-outs . we are working on several projects and we expect to continue to review and evaluate potential acquisitions of businesses , products or technologies , and strategic alliances that we believe will complement our current or future business . subject to the risk factors set forth in part i , item 1a of this report and the general disclaimers set forth in our special note regarding forward-looking statements at the outset of this report , we believe that cash flow from operations and cash available from our amended credit agreement will provide us with sufficient funds in order to fund our expected operations over the next twelve months . our longer-term liquidity is contingent upon future operating performance and our ability to continue to meet financial covenants under our amended credit agreement . we may also require additional capital in the future to fund capital expenditures , acquisitions or other investments , or to repay our convertible notes . the holders of the convertible notes may require us to repurchase the notes on december 13 of 2013 , and on each of december 15 , 2017 , 2022 , 2027 and 2032 at a repurchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of their accreted principal amount . these capital requirements could be substantial . our operating performance may also be affected by matters discussed under the above-referenced risk factors as elsewhere in this report . these risks , trends and uncertainties may also adversely affect our long- term liquidity. .

['0.01748', '0.05793']

['what was the total cost of the all the towers in the mtn group acquisition, in millions of dollars?', 'and what is that in dollars?', 'and what was the number of towers bought?', 'what was, then, their average price?', 'and concerning that total cost, by how much did it change with the adjustments?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 15.5 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 19.8 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . uganda acquisition 2014on december 8 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with mtn group to establish a joint venture in uganda . the joint venture is controlled by a holding company of which a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( the 201catc uganda subsidiary 201d ) holds a 51% ( 51 % ) interest and a wholly owned subsidiary of mtn group ( the 201cmtn uganda subsidiary 201d ) holds a 49% ( 49 % ) interest . the joint venture is managed and controlled by the company and owns a tower operations company in uganda . pursuant to the agreement , the joint venture agreed to purchase a total of up to 1000 existing communications sites from mtn group 2019s operating subsidiary in uganda , subject to customary closing conditions . on june 29 , 2012 , the joint venture acquired 962 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 171.5 million , subject to post-closing adjustments . the aggregate purchase price was subsequently increased to $ 173.2 million , subject to future post-closing adjustments . under the terms of the purchase agreement , legal title to certain of these communications sites will be transferred upon fulfillment of certain conditions by mtn group . prior to the fulfillment of these conditions , the company will operate and maintain control of these communications sites , and accordingly , reflect these sites in the allocation of purchase price and the consolidated operating results . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase price consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>preliminary purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>$ 2258</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>102366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>63500</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-7528 ( 7528 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 160596</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>12564</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 36.5 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 27.0 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be not be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . germany acquisition 2014on november 14 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase communications sites from e-plus mobilfunk gmbh & co . kg . on december 4 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 2031 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 525.7 million. .

['173.2', '173200000.0', '962.0', '180041.58004', '1.7']

['what percentage of total other assets was made of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets in 2012?', 'and in 2011?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements note 12 . other assets other assets are generally less liquid , non-financial assets . the table below presents other assets by type. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property leasehold improvements andequipment1</td><td>$ 8217</td><td>$ 8697</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2</td><td>5099</td><td>5468</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax-related assets3</td><td>5620</td><td>5017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity-method investments4</td><td>453</td><td>664</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miscellaneous receivables and other5</td><td>20234</td><td>3306</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39623</td><td>$ 23152</td></tr></table> 1 . net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $ 9.05 billion and $ 8.46 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively . 2 . includes $ 149 million of intangible assets classified as held for sale . see note 13 for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets . 3 . see note 24 for further information about income taxes . 4 . excludes investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option where the firm would otherwise apply the equity method of accounting of $ 5.54 billion and $ 4.17 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d the firm has generally elected the fair value option for such investments acquired after the fair value option became available . 5 . includes $ 16.77 billion of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012 . assets held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2012 , the firm classified its reinsurance business within its institutional client services segment as held for sale . assets related to this business of $ 16.92 billion , consisting primarily of available-for-sale securities and separate account assets at fair value , are included in 201cother assets . 201d liabilities related to the business of $ 14.62 billion are included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 8 for further information about insurance-related assets and liabilities held for sale at fair value . the firm expects to complete the sale of a majority stake in its reinsurance business in 2013 and does not expect to recognize a material gain or loss upon the sale . upon completion of the sale , the firm will no longer consolidate this business . property , leasehold improvements and equipment property , leasehold improvements and equipment included $ 6.20 billion and $ 6.48 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to property , leasehold improvements and equipment that the firm uses in connection with its operations . the remainder is held by investment entities , including vies , consolidated by the firm . substantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset . leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease , whichever is shorter . certain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software . property , leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset 2019s or asset group 2019s carrying value may not be fully recoverable . the firm 2019s policy for impairment testing of property , leasehold improvements and equipment is the same as is used for identifiable intangible assets with finite lives . see note 13 for further information . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 163 .

['0.12869', '0.23618']

['what was the total increase in the volume/weather segment from 2009 to 2010?', 'and what is the average of this increase per gwh increased in the billed electricity usage?', 'in that same period, what was the total change in the net revenue?', 'and what is this change as a percentage of that net revenue in 2009?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 536.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>18.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 555.3</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

['18900000.0', '18068.83365', '18.6', '555.3']

['what was the change in the investment income from 2011 to 2012?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that income in 2011, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the company had net realized capital losses for 2015 of $ 184.1 million . in 2015 , the company recorded $ 102.2 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities , $ 45.6 million of losses due to fair value re-measurements and $ 36.3 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities . in 2014 , net realized capital gains were $ 84.0 million due to $ 121.7 million of gains from fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 1.9 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 39.5 million of other-than- temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities . in 2013 , net realized capital gains were $ 300.2 million due to $ 258.9 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 42.4 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 1.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities . the company 2019s cash and invested assets totaled $ 17.7 billion at december 31 , 2015 , which consisted of 87.4% ( 87.4 % ) fixed maturities and cash , of which 91.4% ( 91.4 % ) were investment grade ; 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) equity securities and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) other invested assets . the average maturity of fixed maturity securities was 4.1 years at december 31 , 2015 , and their overall duration was 3.0 years . as of december 31 , 2015 , the company did not have any direct investments in commercial real estate or direct commercial mortgages or any material holdings of derivative investments ( other than equity index put option contracts as discussed in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data 201d - note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements ) or securities of issuers that are experiencing cash flow difficulty to an extent that the company 2019s management believes could threaten the issuer 2019s ability to meet debt service payments , except where other-than-temporary impairments have been recognized . the company 2019s investment portfolio includes structured commercial mortgage-backed securities ( 201ccmbs 201d ) with a book value of $ 264.9 million and a market value of $ 266.3 million . cmbs securities comprising more than 70% ( 70 % ) of the december 31 , 2015 market value are rated aaa by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc ( 201cstandard & poor 2019s 201d ) . furthermore , securities comprising more than 90% ( 90 % ) of the market value are rated investment grade by standard & poor 2019s . the following table reflects investment results for the company for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>december 31 , average investments ( 1 )</td><td>december 31 , pre-tax investment income ( 2 )</td><td>december 31 , pre-tax effective yield</td><td>december 31 , pre-tax realized net capital ( losses ) gains ( 3 )</td><td>december 31 , pre-tax unrealized net capital gains ( losses )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 17430.8</td><td>$ 473.8</td><td>2.72% ( 2.72 % )</td><td>$ -184.1 ( 184.1 )</td><td>$ -194.0 ( 194.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>16831.9</td><td>530.6</td><td>3.15% ( 3.15 % )</td><td>84.0</td><td>20.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>16472.5</td><td>548.5</td><td>3.33% ( 3.33 % )</td><td>300.2</td><td>-467.2 ( 467.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>16220.9</td><td>600.2</td><td>3.70% ( 3.70 % )</td><td>164.4</td><td>161.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>15680.9</td><td>620.0</td><td>3.95% ( 3.95 % )</td><td>6.9</td><td>106.6</td></tr></table> pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax realized net unrealized net average investment effective capital ( losses ) capital gains ( dollars in millions ) investments ( 1 ) income ( 2 ) yield gains ( 3 ) ( losses ) 17430.8$ 473.8$ 2.72% ( 2.72 % ) ( 184.1 ) $ ( 194.0 ) $ 16831.9 530.6 3.15% ( 3.15 % ) 84.0 20.3 16472.5 548.5 3.33% ( 3.33 % ) 300.2 ( 467.2 ) 16220.9 600.2 3.70% ( 3.70 % ) 164.4 161.0 15680.9 620.0 3.95% ( 3.95 % ) 6.9 106.6 ( 1 ) average of the beginning and ending carrying values of investments and cash , less net funds held , future policy benefit reserve , and non-interest bearing cash . bonds , common stock and redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stocks are carried at market value . common stock which are actively managed are carried at fair value . ( 2 ) after investment expenses , excluding realized net capital gains ( losses ) . ( 3 ) included in 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 are fair value re-measurements of ( $ 45.6 ) million , $ 121.7 million , $ 258.9 million , $ 118.1 million and ( $ 4.4 ) million , respectively. .

['-19.8', '-0.03194']

['in 2014, what percentage did the notional value of derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap represent in relation to the fair value?', 'and which one was higher the notional amount of those designated derivatives or of the non designated ones?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 17 financial derivatives we use derivative financial instruments ( derivatives ) primarily to help manage exposure to interest rate , market and credit risk and reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income , fair value of assets and liabilities , and cash flows . we also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities . derivatives represent contracts between parties that usually require little or no initial net investment and result in one party delivering cash or another type of asset to the other party based on a notional amount and an underlying as specified in the contract . derivative transactions are often measured in terms of notional amount , but this amount is generally not exchanged and it is not recorded on the balance sheet . the notional amount is the basis to which the underlying is applied to determine required payments under the derivative contract . the underlying is a referenced interest rate ( commonly libor ) , security price , credit spread or other index . residential and commercial real estate loan commitments associated with loans to be sold also qualify as derivative instruments . the following table presents the notional amounts and gross fair values of all derivative assets and liabilities held by pnc : table 127 : total gross derivatives . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>december 31 2013 notional/contractamount</td><td>december 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )</td><td>december 31 2013 liabilityfairvalue ( b )</td><td>december 31 2013 notional/contractamount</td><td>december 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )</td><td>liabilityfairvalue ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap</td><td>$ 36197</td><td>$ 1189</td><td>$ 364</td><td>$ 29270</td><td>$ 1872</td><td>$ 152</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under gaap</td><td>345059</td><td>3604</td><td>3570</td><td>337086</td><td>6696</td><td>6458</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total gross derivatives</td><td>$ 381256</td><td>$ 4793</td><td>$ 3934</td><td>$ 366356</td><td>$ 8568</td><td>$ 6610</td></tr></table> ( a ) included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet . ( b ) included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . all derivatives are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value . derivative balances are presented on the consolidated balance sheet on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and any related cash collateral exchanged with counterparties . further discussion regarding the rights of setoff associated with these legally enforceable master netting agreements is included in the offsetting , counterparty credit risk , and contingent features section below . our exposure related to risk participations where we sold protection is discussed in the credit derivatives section below . any nonperformance risk , including credit risk , is included in the determination of the estimated net fair value of the derivatives . further discussion on how derivatives are accounted for is included in note 1 accounting policies . derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap certain derivatives used to manage interest rate risk as part of our asset and liability risk management activities are designated as accounting hedges under gaap . derivatives hedging the risks associated with changes in the fair value of assets or liabilities are considered fair value hedges , derivatives hedging the variability of expected future cash flows are considered cash flow hedges , and derivatives hedging a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are considered net investment hedges . designating derivatives as accounting hedges allows for gains and losses on those derivatives , to the extent effective , to be recognized in the income statement in the same period the hedged items affect earnings . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 189 .

['30.44323', 'no']

['what were cabinet sales in 2017?', 'what were they in 2016?', 'what is the net change?', 'what was the 2016 value?', 'what is the net change over the 2016 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: south america . approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets . this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors . in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 . this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands . doors . our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand . this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials . therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s . and canada . this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets . in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 . this segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella . security . our security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand . this segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia . approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets . this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets . in addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers . in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 . master lock competes with abus , w.h . brady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king . annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cabinets</td><td>$ 2467.1</td><td>$ 2397.8</td><td>$ 2173.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>plumbing</td><td>1720.8</td><td>1534.4</td><td>1414.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>doors</td><td>502.9</td><td>473.0</td><td>439.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>security</td><td>592.5</td><td>579.7</td><td>552.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5283.3</td><td>$ 4984.9</td><td>$ 4579.4</td></tr></table> for additional financial information for each of our business segments , refer to note 18 , 201cinformation on business segments , 201d to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this annual report on form other information raw materials . the table below indicates the principal raw materials used by each of our segments . these materials are available from a number of sources . volatility in the prices of commodities and energy used in making and distributing our products impacts the cost of manufacturing our products. .

['2467.1', '2397.8', '69.3', '2397.8', '0.0289']

['what is the sum of net revenues from 2016 and 2017?', 'what is that divided by 2?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1520.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>33.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>opportunity sales</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>-14.8 ( 14.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-29.0 ( 29.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>6.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 1522.6</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 . the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase . the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

['3043.1', '1521.55']

['for the five year period ended in 2012, what was the fluctuation of the stockholder return for cadence design systems inc .?', 'and what is this fluctuation as a percent of that return in 2007?', 'in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the nasdaq composite?', 'and what was this nasdaq composite fluctuation as a percentage of the return of that stock in 2007?', 'what was, then, the difference between the cadence design systems inc . percentage and this nasdaq composite one?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/29/2007</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>22.55</td><td>35.17</td><td>48.50</td><td>61.07</td><td>78.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>59.03</td><td>82.25</td><td>97.32</td><td>98.63</td><td>110.78</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.60</td><td>82.76</td><td>108.11</td><td>95.48</td><td>109.88</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

['-21.08', '-0.2108', '10.78', '0.1078', '-31.86']

['what was the total, in millions, of sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in the months of december and august of 2003, combined, in the locations of bangladesh and republic of georgia?', 'including november of that year, what then becomes that total?', 'what were the total sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in december 2003 in pakistan/oman, in millions?', 'including these total sales, what then becomes that total, also in millions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses . these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions . the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond . asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries . this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity . the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 . sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project name</td><td>date completed</td><td>sales proceeds ( in millions )</td><td>location</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cilcorp/medina valley</td><td>january 2003</td><td>$ 495</td><td>united states</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart</td><td>january 2003</td><td>$ 59</td><td>australia</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>mountainview</td><td>march 2003</td><td>$ 30</td><td>united states</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kelvin</td><td>march 2003</td><td>$ 29</td><td>south africa</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>songas</td><td>april 2003</td><td>$ 94</td><td>tanzania</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>aes barry limited</td><td>july 2003</td><td>a340/$ 62</td><td>united kingdom</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd</td><td>december 2003</td><td>$ 145</td><td>bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi</td><td>august 2003</td><td>$ 23</td><td>republic of georgia</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>medway power limited/aes medway operations limited</td><td>november 2003</td><td>a347/$ 78</td><td>united kingdom</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>aes oasis limited</td><td>december 2003</td><td>$ 150</td><td>pakistan/oman</td></tr></table> the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future . however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet . for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries . depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations . furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve . subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses . the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities . businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile . brazil eletropaulo . aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized . in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it . aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a . ( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a . ( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a . ( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

['168.0', '246.0', '150.0', '396.0']

['what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006?', 'and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?', 'what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2006?', 'and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?', 'what is, then, the difference between the performance value change of the united parcel service , inc . and the one of s&p 500 index?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/01</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 117.19</td><td>$ 140.49</td><td>$ 163.54</td><td>$ 146.35</td><td>$ 148.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 77.90</td><td>$ 100.24</td><td>$ 111.15</td><td>$ 116.61</td><td>$ 135.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.52</td><td>$ 116.70</td><td>$ 149.06</td><td>$ 166.42</td><td>$ 182.76</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

['148.92', '48.92', '135.02', '35.02', '13.9']

['what is the value of miscellaneous receivables and other assets in 2012 divided by 100?', 'what is that less the value of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements note 12 . other assets other assets are generally less liquid , non-financial assets . the table below presents other assets by type. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property leasehold improvements andequipment1</td><td>$ 8217</td><td>$ 8697</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2</td><td>5099</td><td>5468</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax-related assets3</td><td>5620</td><td>5017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity-method investments4</td><td>453</td><td>664</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miscellaneous receivables and other5</td><td>20234</td><td>3306</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39623</td><td>$ 23152</td></tr></table> 1 . net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $ 9.05 billion and $ 8.46 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively . 2 . includes $ 149 million of intangible assets classified as held for sale . see note 13 for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets . 3 . see note 24 for further information about income taxes . 4 . excludes investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option where the firm would otherwise apply the equity method of accounting of $ 5.54 billion and $ 4.17 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d the firm has generally elected the fair value option for such investments acquired after the fair value option became available . 5 . includes $ 16.77 billion of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012 . assets held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2012 , the firm classified its reinsurance business within its institutional client services segment as held for sale . assets related to this business of $ 16.92 billion , consisting primarily of available-for-sale securities and separate account assets at fair value , are included in 201cother assets . 201d liabilities related to the business of $ 14.62 billion are included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 8 for further information about insurance-related assets and liabilities held for sale at fair value . the firm expects to complete the sale of a majority stake in its reinsurance business in 2013 and does not expect to recognize a material gain or loss upon the sale . upon completion of the sale , the firm will no longer consolidate this business . property , leasehold improvements and equipment property , leasehold improvements and equipment included $ 6.20 billion and $ 6.48 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to property , leasehold improvements and equipment that the firm uses in connection with its operations . the remainder is held by investment entities , including vies , consolidated by the firm . substantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset . leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease , whichever is shorter . certain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software . property , leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset 2019s or asset group 2019s carrying value may not be fully recoverable . the firm 2019s policy for impairment testing of property , leasehold improvements and equipment is the same as is used for identifiable intangible assets with finite lives . see note 13 for further information . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 163 .

['20.234', '3.464']

['what was the net revenue in 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?', 'and what was it in 2015?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'what was the net revenue in 2015 for entergy texas , inc.?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2015 net revenue?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 637.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>14.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>12.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale</td><td>-27.8 ( 27.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-4.3 ( 4.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 644.2</td></tr></table> the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

['644.2', '637.2', '7.0', '637.2', '0.01099']

['what was the percentage of the total second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment that was office related in 2012?', 'what was the percent of the debt maturities outstanding at 12/31/12 that was unsecured debt?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: annual report 2013 duke realty corporation 37 in addition to the capitalization of overhead costs discussed above , we also capitalized $ 16.8 million , $ 9.4 million and $ 4.3 million of interest costs in the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial</td><td>$ 41971</td><td>$ 33095</td><td>$ 34872</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>office</td><td>46600</td><td>30092</td><td>63933</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>medical office</td><td>3106</td><td>641</td><td>410</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-reportable rental operations segments</td><td>121</td><td>56</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 91798</td><td>$ 63884</td><td>$ 99264</td></tr></table> both our first and second generation expenditures vary significantly between leases on a per square foot basis , dependent upon several factors including the product type , the nature of a tenant's operations , the specific physical characteristics of each individual property as well as the market in which the property is located . second generation expenditures related to the 79 suburban office buildings that were sold in the blackstone office disposition totaled $ 26.2 million in 2011 . dividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the "code" ) , in order to maintain our reit status . we paid dividends of $ 0.68 per common share for each of the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . we expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors . distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . at december 31 , 2013 we had three series of preferred stock outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) and are paid quarterly in arrears . in february 2013 , we redeemed all of our outstanding series o shares for a total payment of $ 178.0 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 3.7 million . in march 2012 , we redeemed all of our 6.950% ( 6.950 % ) series m cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( "series m shares" ) for a total payment of $ 168.3 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.9 million . in july 2011 , we redeemed all of our 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) series n cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( "series n shares" ) for a total payment of $ 108.6 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.0 million . debt maturities debt outstanding at december 31 , 2013 had a face value totaling $ 4.3 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 5.49% ( 5.49 % ) and with maturity dates ranging between 2014 and 2028 . of this total amount , we had $ 3.1 billion of unsecured debt , $ 1.1 billion of secured debt and $ 88.0 million outstanding on the drlp unsecured line of credit at december 31 , 2013 . we made scheduled and unscheduled principal payments of $ 1.0 billion on outstanding debt during the year ended december 31 , 2013. .

['0.47104', '0.72093']

['what is the sum of long-term debt due in 2004 and 2005?', 'what is that divided by 1000?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds . ( b ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed . ( c ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2004 and can then be remarketed . ( d ) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1 , 2003 . entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders , pursuant to the mandatory tender provision , and has not remarketed the bonds at this time . entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds . ( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st . charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 . ( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed . ( g ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( h ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2003 , for the next five years are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 503215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 462420</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 75896</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624539</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 941625</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above . in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur. .

['965635.0', '965.635']

['what was the change in the amount of guarantees from parent company from 2007 to 2008?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that amount of guarantees in 2007, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases . the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries . the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors . we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable . when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity . however , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date . in such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date . if deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense . compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses . this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners . the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 . as such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . as of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 67.5</td><td>$ 32.1</td><td>$ 30.1</td><td>$ 4.5</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 139.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>put and call options with affiliates1</td><td>11.8</td><td>34.3</td><td>73.6</td><td>70.8</td><td>70.2</td><td>2.2</td><td>262.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>79.3</td><td>66.4</td><td>103.7</td><td>75.3</td><td>75.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>402.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less cash compensation expense included above</td><td>2.6</td><td>1.3</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.3</td><td>2014</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 76.7</td><td>$ 65.1</td><td>$ 103.0</td><td>$ 74.6</td><td>$ 75.6</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>$ 397.2</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions . in such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable . as a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no . d-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .

['-71.4', '-0.21828']

['what was the beginning balance in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2018?', 'what is the beginning balance in 2017?', 'what is the net change from 2017 to 2018?', 'what was the 2017 value?', 'what is the net change over the 2017 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes . the deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized . we provide u.s . income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system . to the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s . tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings . as of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s . income taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million . the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million . as of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state . we also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively . the net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 . the state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely . the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized . as of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets . for fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 172945</td><td>$ 178413</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>16191</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>-4000 ( 4000 )</td><td>-30166 ( 30166 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>60721</td><td>24927</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td><td>-3876 ( 3876 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-45922 ( 45922 )</td><td>-8819 ( 8819 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-3783 ( 3783 )</td><td>8786</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 196152</td><td>$ 172945</td></tr></table> the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . these amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years . we file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states . for ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .

['172945.0', '178413.0', '-5468.0', '178413.0', '-0.03065']

['what is the weighted average discount rate for u.s pension plans in 2015?', 'what was the number in 2014?', 'what is the difference?', 'what is the difference divided by the 2014 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates have been discussed with our audit committee . the following is a discussion of the more significant assumptions , estimates , accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements : 2022 revenue recognition - we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists , delivery of product has occurred , the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured . for our company , this means that revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss is transferred to our customers . title transfers to our customers upon shipment or upon receipt at the customer's location as determined by the sales terms for each transaction . the company estimates the cost of sales returns based on historical experience , and these estimates are normally immaterial . 2022 goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . we perform our annual impairment analysis in the first quarter of each year . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2015 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.4 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which is comprised of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2015 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non-amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value , and any reasonable movement in the assumptions would not result in an impairment . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . 2022 marketing and advertising costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs which include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer achieving the specified targets and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . we have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to estimate our marketing programs during the past three years . 2022 employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pensions and postretirement plans are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . pension plans</td><td>4.30% ( 4.30 % )</td><td>3.95% ( 3.95 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-u.s . pension plans</td><td>1.68% ( 1.68 % )</td><td>1.92% ( 1.92 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>postretirement plans</td><td>4.45% ( 4.45 % )</td><td>4.20% ( 4.20 % )</td></tr></table> we anticipate that assumption changes , coupled with decreased amortization of deferred losses , will decrease 2016 pre-tax u.s . and non- u.s . pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 209 million as compared with approximately $ 240 million in 2015 , excluding .

['4.3', '3.95', '0.35', '0.08861']

['what was the value included in the capital investments for buyout of locomotives in 2012, in dollars?', 'and how many locomotives were bought with that value?', 'what was, then, the average cost of each one of those locomotives?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-2982 ( 2982 )</td><td>-3049 ( 3049 )</td><td>-2682 ( 2682 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cashequivalents</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 369</td><td>$ -154 ( 154 )</td></tr></table> operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) . higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 . in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 . lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 . investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

['75000000.0', '165.0', '454545.45455']

['what was the change in the number of shares of the issuance under the employee stock purchase plan from 2016 to 2017?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that number in 2016, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) employee stock purchase plan republic employees are eligible to participate in an employee stock purchase plan . the plan allows participants to purchase our common stock for 95% ( 95 % ) of its quoted market price on the last day of each calendar quarter . for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , issuances under this plan totaled 113941 shares , 130085 shares and 141055 shares , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , shares reserved for issuance to employees under this plan totaled 0.4 million and republic held employee contributions of approximately $ 1.8 million for the purchase of common stock . 12 . stock repurchases and dividends stock repurchases stock repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>number of shares repurchased</td><td>9.6</td><td>8.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amount paid</td><td>$ 610.7</td><td>$ 403.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average cost per share</td><td>$ 63.84</td><td>$ 48.56</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 0.5 million repurchased shares pending settlement and $ 33.8 million was unpaid and included within other accrued liabilities . in october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 . before this , $ 98.4 million remained under a prior authorization . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . while the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors . the share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time . as of december 31 , 2017 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.8 billion . in december 2015 , our board of directors changed the status of 71272964 treasury shares to authorized and unissued . in doing so , the number of our issued shares was reduced by the stated amount . our accounting policy is to deduct the par value from common stock and to reflect the excess of cost over par value as a deduction from additional paid-in capital . the change in unissued shares resulted in a reduction of $ 2295.3 million in treasury stock , $ 0.6 million in common stock , and $ 2294.7 million in additional paid-in capital . there was no effect on our total stockholders 2019 equity position as a result of the change . dividends in october 2017 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.345 per share . cash dividends declared were $ 446.3 million , $ 423.8 million and $ 404.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 114.4 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2018 . 13 . earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc . by the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the .

['-16144.0', '-0.1241']

['in the year of 2010, what percentage did the net allowance represent in relation to the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio?', 'and what was the combined total of this net allowance and the carrying amount?', 'what percentage did this total represent in relation to the carrying amount?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>accretable yield</td><td>carrying amount of loan receivable</td><td>allowance</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 920</td><td>$ 95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>130</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disposals/payments received</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td><td>44</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>builds ( reductions ) to the allowance</td><td>128</td><td>2014</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>increase to expected cash flows</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>19</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fx/other</td><td>17</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 469</td><td>$ 77</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

['0.19643', '469.0', '0.16418']

['what was the total value spent on the repurchase of shares during october 2007?', 'and how much is that in millions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: page 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 ( e ) of cercla . the usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $ 4 million and $ 5 million . based on the information available to the company at the present time , the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity , results of operations or financial condition of the company . europe in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk , wine , fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages . ball packaging europe gmbh ( bpe ) , together with certain other plaintiffs , contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation ( verpackungsverordnung ) in federal and state administrative court . all other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases , together with minimal ancillary legal fees . the relevant industries , including bpe and its competitors , have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers , which has been operational since may 1 , 2006 , the date required under the deposit legislation . item 4 . submission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007 . part ii item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock ( bll ) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange . there were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3 , 2008 . common stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 . purchases of securities total number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total number of shares purchased ( a )</td><td>average pricepaid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 to october 28 2007</td><td>705292</td><td>$ 53.53</td><td>705292</td><td>4904824</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>october 29 to november 25 2007</td><td>431170</td><td>$ 48.11</td><td>431170</td><td>4473654</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>november 26 to december 31 2007</td><td>8310 ( c )</td><td>$ 44.99</td><td>8310</td><td>4465344</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1144772</td><td>$ 51.42</td><td>1144772</td><td></td></tr></table> ( a ) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities . ( b ) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors . on january 23 , 2008 , ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock . this repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations . ( c ) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7 , 2008 , for approximately $ 31 million . also does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7 , 2008. .

['37754280.76', '37.75428']

['during 2009, what was the total of additions charged to expense?', 'and what was the total of accounts written-off?', 'what was, then, the combined total of both segments?', 'and as of december 31 of that year, what percentage of the restricted cash was due to proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: in our primary disbursement accounts which were reclassified as accounts payable and other accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . concentration of credit risk financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents , trade accounts receivable and derivative instruments . we place our cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions . such balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits . in order to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas . we provide services to commercial , industrial , municipal and residential customers in the united states and puerto rico . we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but do not require collateral to support customer receivables . we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information . no customer exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of our outstanding accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2009 or 2008 . accounts receivable , net of allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal and other services . our receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash . the carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , represents their estimated net realizable value . provisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions . we also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis . in general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of ninety days old . past due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccess- ful in collecting amounts due . the following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 65.7</td><td>$ 14.7</td><td>$ 18.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions charged to expense</td><td>27.3</td><td>36.5</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accounts written-off</td><td>-37.8 ( 37.8 )</td><td>-12.7 ( 12.7 )</td><td>-7.8 ( 7.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquisitions</td><td>-</td><td>27.2</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 55.2</td><td>$ 65.7</td><td>$ 14.7</td></tr></table> subsequent to our acquisition of allied , we recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $ 14.2 million to adjust the allowance acquired from allied to conform to republic 2019s accounting policies . we also recorded $ 5.4 million to provide for specific bankruptcy exposures in 2008 . in 2007 , we recorded a $ 4.3 million reduction in our allowance for doubtful accounts as a result of refining our estimate of the allowance based on our historical collection experience . restricted cash as of december 31 , 2009 , we had $ 236.6 million of restricted cash , of which $ 93.1 million was proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings and will be used to fund capital republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .

['27.3', '-37.8', '-10.5', '0.39349']

['what was the total of u.s . dollar notes issued in 2014 and that matured in either 2024 or 2044, in millions?', 'including the u.s . dollar notes that matured in 2017, what then becomes that total, in millions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 . ( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 . ( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( e ) u.s . dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products . there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees . at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td></td><td>face value ( e )</td><td>interest rate</td><td>issuance</td><td>maturity</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 )</td><td>1.875% ( 1.875 % )</td><td>march 2014</td><td>march 2021</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 )</td><td>2.875% ( 2.875 % )</td><td>march 2014</td><td>march 2026</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( b )</td><td>20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 )</td><td>2.875% ( 2.875 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>may 2029</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>swiss franc notes</td><td>( c )</td><td>chf275 ( approximately $ 311 )</td><td>0.750% ( 0.750 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>december 2019</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>swiss franc notes</td><td>( b )</td><td>chf250 ( approximately $ 283 )</td><td>1.625% ( 1.625 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>may 2024</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 500</td><td>1.250% ( 1.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2017</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>3.250% ( 3.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2024</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>4.250% ( 4.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2044</td></tr></table> our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 . ( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 . ( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( e ) u.s . dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products . there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees . at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .

['1500.0', '2000.0']

['what was the amount of statutory capital and surplus for bermuda subsidiaries in 2010?', 'and what was it in 2009?', 'by how much, then, did it increase over the year?', 'in that same period, what was the change in the net income for those same bermuda subsidiaries?', 'and what is this change as a portion of that income in 2009?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: n o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares , 1230881 shares , and 638401 shares , respectively . 19 . related party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda . the trustees are principally comprised of ace management . the company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda , the balance of which was $ 30 million and $ 31 million , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate , some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent , professional real estate appraisers . the borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities . accordingly , the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan , including the real estate properties . 20 . statutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate . these regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities . there are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries . the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators . statutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items . the statutory capital and surplus of the u.s . subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 . the amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 850 million . the following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s . subsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2010</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2009</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2008</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2010</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory capital and surplus</td><td>$ 11798</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6266</td><td>$ 5885</td><td>$ 5368</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>statutory net income</td><td>$ 2430</td><td>$ 2369</td><td>$ 2196</td><td>$ 1047</td><td>$ 904</td><td>$ 818</td></tr></table> as permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 206 million , $ 215 million , and $ 211 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , respectively . the company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations . some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements . in some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business . these licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests . jurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements. .

['11798.0', '9164.0', '2634.0', '61.0', '0.02575']

['what is the value of cap ex for pp&e in 2010?', 'what is it 2009?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is that divided by the 2009 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3547</td><td>$ 3173</td><td>$ 4421</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td><td>-1518 ( 1518 )</td><td>-907 ( 907 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-3363 ( 3363 )</td><td>-1476 ( 1476 )</td><td>-3938 ( 3938 )</td></tr></table> operating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 . the increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 . partially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan . this reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts . operating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred . the improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 . these improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 . the decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas . the increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems . the decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments . net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 . the decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million . partially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million . the decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities . investing activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments . we also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure . capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 . we expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years . acquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates . amounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates . we paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 . in 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) . there were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 . during 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 . financing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million . of the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 . in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) . under the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . we repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases . in connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program . cash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million . those activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. .

['820.0', '852.0', '-32.0', '-0.03756']

['what was the total variance in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?', 'and what was the variance in volume/weather in that same period?', 'how much, then, does this volume/weather variance represent in relation to the net revenue one, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 540.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>36.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>21.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-24.6 ( 24.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 577.8</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year . usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .

['37.6', '21.3', '0.56649']

['what is the net rental expense in 2009?', 'what about in 2007?', 'what is the net change?', 'what percentage change does this represent?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements of the $ 446 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 53 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement . operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 minimum rental ( a ) $ 238 $ 245 $ 209 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>minimum rental ( a )</td><td>$ 238</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 209</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent rental</td><td>19</td><td>22</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net rental expense</td><td>$ 257</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 242</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 3 million , $ 5 million and $ 8 million paid by united states steel in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 on assumed leases . 26 . commitments and contingencies we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment . certain of these matters are discussed below . the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements . however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably . environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment . these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites . penalties may be imposed for noncompliance . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 116 million and $ 111 million . it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed . receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 59 and $ 60 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . legal cases 2013 we , along with other refining companies , settled a number of lawsuits pertaining to methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) in 2008 . presently , we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 27 cases arising in four states alleging damages for mtbe contamination . like the cases that we settled in 2008 , 12 of the remaining cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation ( 201cmdl 201d ) in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings . the other 15 cases are in new york state courts ( nassau and suffolk counties ) . plaintiffs in 26 of the 27 cases allege damages to water supply wells from contamination of groundwater by mtbe , similar to the damages claimed in the cases settled in 2008 . in the remaining case , the new jersey department of environmental protection is seeking the cost of remediating mtbe contamination and natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe . we are vigorously defending these cases . we have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of these cases . we do not expect our share of liability for these cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . we voluntarily discontinued producing mtbe in 2002 . we are currently a party to one qui tam case , which alleges that marathon and other defendants violated the false claims act with respect to the reporting and payment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids for federal and indian leases . a qui tam action is an action in which the relator files suit on behalf of himself as well as the federal government . the case currently pending is u.s . ex rel harrold e . wright v . agip petroleum co . et al . it is primarily a gas valuation case . marathon has reached a settlement with the relator and the doj which will be finalized after the indian tribes review and approve the settlement terms . such settlement is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies . under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements . in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .

['257.0', '242.0', '15.0', '0.06198']

['what was the percentage of the total investments amount attributable to the track in 2006?', 'what was the anticipated change in the capital investment between 2006 and 2007?', 'so what was the anticipated percentage increase?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 . millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>track</td><td>$ 1487</td><td>$ 1472</td><td>$ 1328</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capacity and commercial facilities</td><td>510</td><td>509</td><td>347</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>locomotives and freight cars</td><td>135</td><td>98</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>110</td><td>90</td><td>76</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2242</td><td>$ 2169</td><td>$ 1876</td></tr></table> in 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases . these investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies . we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity . we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 . we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 . for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively . the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income . the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis . earnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes . fixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges . see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges . financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the "facilities" ) . the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper . neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 . commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers . these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 . we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities . retained earnings available .

['0.66325', '-2238.8', '-0.99857']

['what is the sum of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2017 and 2016?', 'what is the number of shares in 2015?', 'what is the sum including all 3 years?', 'what is that sum divided by 3?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: of prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income . we adopted the requirements of asu no . 2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method . we expect the adoption of asu no . 2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year . we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no . 2017-07 . intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no . 2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test . the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified . wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount . under the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance . the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption . we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment . the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests . derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no . 2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness . the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted . we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard . we plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 . leases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no . 2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors . the new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted . the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements . we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures . we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 . note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>287.8</td><td>299.3</td><td>310.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>2.8</td><td>3.8</td><td>4.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations</td><td>290.6</td><td>303.1</td><td>314.7</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries . the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired . as a result of the acquisition .

['593.7', '314.7', '908.4', '302.8']

['in 2017, what was the amount of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with credit facilities?', 'and in 2016?', 'so what was the change in this value between the years?', 'and the value for 2016 again?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 . the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 . other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 . 14 . debt long-term debt consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )</td><td>2014</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )</td><td>600</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )</td><td>600</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )</td><td>84</td><td>84</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less unamortized debt issuance costs</td><td>-26 ( 26 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>1279</td><td>1278</td></tr></table> credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders . the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 . the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million . the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) . the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio . the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) . the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio . each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility . in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below . in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below . interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually . the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .

['11.0', '8.0', '3.0', '8.0', '0.375']

['what is the total value of the issued options, warrants, and rights?', 'what about in millions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 . of this report . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1442912</td><td>$ 86.98</td><td>4446967</td></tr></table> part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 . of this report . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

['125504485.76', '125.50449']

['what was the cash dividend per share in the last quarter of 2002?', 'and what was it in the first quarter?', 'what was, then, the change in that cash dividend throughout 2002?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation in relation to that cash dividend in the first quarter?', 'how much is that in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period . comparable cash dividends are expected in the future . on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter ended</td><td>2002 high</td><td>2002 low</td><td>2002 dividend</td><td>2002 high</td><td>2002 low</td><td>dividend</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 25.84</td><td>$ 21.50</td><td>$ .455</td><td>$ 24.80</td><td>$ 22.00</td><td>$ .45</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september 30</td><td>28.88</td><td>21.40</td><td>.455</td><td>26.17</td><td>21.60</td><td>.45</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>june 30</td><td>28.95</td><td>25.46</td><td>.450</td><td>24.99</td><td>22.00</td><td>.43</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>march 31</td><td>26.50</td><td>22.92</td><td>.450</td><td>25.44</td><td>21.85</td><td>.43</td></tr></table> .

['0.455', '0.45', '0.005', '0.01111', '1.11111']

['what is the value of mmboe from canada divided by the total?', 'what is that times 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 . we will evaluate how the new requirements of statement no . 141 ( r ) would impact any business combinations completed in 2009 or thereafter . in december 2007 , the fasb also issued statement of financial accounting standards no . 160 , noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements 2014an amendment of accounting research bulletin no . 51 . a noncontrolling interest , sometimes called a minority interest , is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable , directly or indirectly , to a parent . statement no . 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . under statement no . 160 , noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary must be reported as a component of consolidated equity separate from the parent 2019s equity . additionally , the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest must be reported separately on the face of the income statement . statement no . 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited . we do not expect the adoption of statement no . 160 to have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures . 2008 estimates the forward-looking statements provided in this discussion are based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information that was used to prepare the december 31 , 2007 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . these forward-looking statements were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , natural gas and ngls during 2008 will be substantially similar to those of 2007 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using a projected average 2008 exchange rate of $ 0.98 u.s . dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . in january 2007 , we announced our intent to divest our west african oil and gas assets and terminate our operations in west africa , including equatorial guinea , cote d 2019ivoire , gabon and other countries in the region . in november 2007 , we announced an agreement to sell our operations in gabon for $ 205.5 million . we are finalizing purchase and sales agreements and obtaining the necessary partner and government approvals for the remaining properties in this divestiture package . we are optimistic we can complete these sales during the first half of 2008 . all west african related revenues , expenses and capital will be reported as discontinued operations in our 2008 financial statements . accordingly , all forward-looking estimates in the following discussion exclude amounts related to our operations in west africa , unless otherwise noted . though we have completed several major property acquisitions and dispositions in recent years , these transactions are opportunity driven . thus , the following forward-looking estimates do not include any financial and operating effects of potential property acquisitions or divestitures that may occur during 2008 , except for west africa as previously discussed . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2008 . we estimate that our combined 2008 oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 240 to 247 mmboe . of this total , approximately 92% ( 92 % ) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31 , 2007 . the following estimates for oil , gas and ngl production are calculated at the midpoint of the estimated range for total production . oil gas ngls total ( mmbbls ) ( bcf ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>12</td><td>626</td><td>23</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . offshore</td><td>8</td><td>68</td><td>1</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>canada</td><td>23</td><td>198</td><td>4</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>international</td><td>23</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>66</td><td>894</td><td>28</td><td>243</td></tr></table> .

['0.24691', '24.69136']