Q
stringlengths 77
607
| C
stringlengths 1.44k
9.66k
| A
stringlengths 14
74
|
|---|---|---|
['what is the rental expense under operating leases in 2005?', 'what about in 2004?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is the rental expense under operating leases in 2004?', 'what percentage change does this represent?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing . | ['324.0', '318.0', '6.0', '318.0', '0.01887'] |
['what was the change in the contingent rental liability from 2007 to 2009?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that contingent rental liability in 2007?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements of the $ 446 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 53 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement . operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 minimum rental ( a ) $ 238 $ 245 $ 209 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>minimum rental ( a )</td><td>$ 238</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 209</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent rental</td><td>19</td><td>22</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net rental expense</td><td>$ 257</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 242</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 3 million , $ 5 million and $ 8 million paid by united states steel in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 on assumed leases . 26 . commitments and contingencies we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment . certain of these matters are discussed below . the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements . however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably . environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment . these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites . penalties may be imposed for noncompliance . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 116 million and $ 111 million . it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed . receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 59 and $ 60 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . legal cases 2013 we , along with other refining companies , settled a number of lawsuits pertaining to methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) in 2008 . presently , we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 27 cases arising in four states alleging damages for mtbe contamination . like the cases that we settled in 2008 , 12 of the remaining cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation ( 201cmdl 201d ) in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings . the other 15 cases are in new york state courts ( nassau and suffolk counties ) . plaintiffs in 26 of the 27 cases allege damages to water supply wells from contamination of groundwater by mtbe , similar to the damages claimed in the cases settled in 2008 . in the remaining case , the new jersey department of environmental protection is seeking the cost of remediating mtbe contamination and natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe . we are vigorously defending these cases . we have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of these cases . we do not expect our share of liability for these cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . we voluntarily discontinued producing mtbe in 2002 . we are currently a party to one qui tam case , which alleges that marathon and other defendants violated the false claims act with respect to the reporting and payment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids for federal and indian leases . a qui tam action is an action in which the relator files suit on behalf of himself as well as the federal government . the case currently pending is u.s . ex rel harrold e . wright v . agip petroleum co . et al . it is primarily a gas valuation case . marathon has reached a settlement with the relator and the doj which will be finalized after the indian tribes review and approve the settlement terms . such settlement is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies . under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements . in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. . | ['-14.0', '-0.42424'] |
['what was the pension service cost in 2018, in millions?', 'and what was it in 2017, also in millions?', 'what was, then, in millions, the total pension service cost in the two years?', 'including the year of 2015, what then becomes this total?', 'and what was the average pension service cost between those three years, in millions?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>pension plans 2018</td><td>pension plans 2017</td><td>pension plans 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>90</td><td>61</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>-112 ( 112 )</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization of prior service credit</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of loss</td><td>78</td><td>92</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net pension cost</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 113</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 35</td></tr></table> net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. . | ['136.0', '110.0', '246.0', '327.0', '109.0'] |
['what was the total cash paid for interest in the years of 2015 and 2016, combined?', 'including the year of 2014, what then becomes this total?', 'and what was the average cash paid for interest between those three years?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 15 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2016 and 2015 : total debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>30 september</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 935.8</td><td>$ 1494.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>371.3</td><td>435.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>4918.1</td><td>3949.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 6225.2</td><td>$ 5879.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>30 september</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>bank obligations</td><td>$ 133.1</td><td>$ 234.3</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>commercial paper</td><td>802.7</td><td>1260.0</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 935.8</td><td>$ 1494.3</td></tr></table> the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2016 and 2015 was 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) and .8% ( .8 % ) , respectively . cash paid for interest , net of amounts capitalized , was $ 121.1 in 2016 , $ 97.5 in 2015 , and $ 132.4 in 2014. . | ['218.6', '351.0', '117.0'] |
['between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the change in the rental expense?', 'and what is this change as a percentage of that expense in 2008?', 'and over the subsequent year, from 2009 to 2010, what was that change?', 'what percentage does this 2009-2010 change represent in relation to the 2009 rental expense?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 62465</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>54236</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>47860</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>37660</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>28622</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>79800</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 310643</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations . typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods . we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property . lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s . of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s . design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. . | ['8.2', '0.16735', '9.7', '0.16958'] |
['what was the total of diluted earnings per common share as of december 2013?', 'and what was it as of december 2012?', 'what was, then, the change in that total over the year?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2012 total of diluted earnings per common share, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows . md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview . discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a . 2022 critical accounting estimates . accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts . 2022 results of operations . an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources . an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity . 2022 fair value of financial instruments . discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments . 2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements . overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule . the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties . words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements . in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements . such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k . our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 . overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended sept . 282013</td><td>three months ended change</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended dec . 292012</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 13834</td><td>$ 13483</td><td>$ 351</td><td>$ 52708</td><td>$ 53341</td><td>$ -633 ( 633 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8571</td><td>$ 8414</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 31521</td><td>$ 33151</td><td>$ -1630 ( 1630 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>62.0% ( 62.0 % )</td><td>62.4% ( 62.4 % )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td><td>59.8% ( 59.8 % )</td><td>62.1% ( 62.1 % )</td><td>( 2.3 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 3549</td><td>$ 3504</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 12291</td><td>$ 14638</td><td>$ -2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 2625</td><td>$ 2950</td><td>$ -325 ( 325 )</td><td>$ 9620</td><td>$ 11005</td><td>$ -1385 ( 1385 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>$ 0.51</td><td>$ 0.58</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 1.89</td><td>$ 2.13</td><td>$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )</td></tr></table> revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 . pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization . dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year . higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 . in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities . these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 . table of contents . | ['1.89', '2.13', '-0.24', '-0.11268'] |
['during 2011, what percentage did the higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments represent in relation to the operating companies income increase?', 'and what percentage did the cost reduction initiatives represent in relation to them?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: middleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains . in the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture . marlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) . in january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally . marlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family . pm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount . these gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands . in the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points . the brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies . in december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 . the following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 . net revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments . operating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) . for 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories . after adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day . pm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) . marlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 . in the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) . pm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 . middleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 . for 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro . marlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points . in 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels . middleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 . for 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 . black & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions . during the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine . this new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties . during the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas . middleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically . smokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management . the following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( cans and packs in millions )</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>copenhagen</td><td>392.5</td><td>354.2</td><td>327.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>skoal</td><td>288.4</td><td>286.8</td><td>274.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>copenhagenandskoal</td><td>680.9</td><td>641.0</td><td>601.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>82.4</td><td>93.6</td><td>122.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total smokeless products</td><td>763.3</td><td>734.6</td><td>724.4</td></tr></table> volume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment . other includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products . new types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations . | ['0.73109', '1.66387'] |
['what is the net change in the cash flows from operations from 2011 to 2012?', 'what is the cash flow from operations in 2011?', 'what percentage change does this represent?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: during the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) . during the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . 0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 . on july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 . schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total cost of shares purchased</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 971883</td><td>14087.8</td><td>$ 68.99</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 2997688</td><td>36940.4</td><td>$ 81.15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 1716675</td><td>26624.8</td><td>$ 64.48</td></tr></table> 0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 . in recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there . schlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries . at december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) . 0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively . on january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 . on january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 . on january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 . capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 . 0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans . the us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions . 0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 . during 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. . | ['0.7', '6.1', '0.11475'] |
['for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions?', 'and as of that same date, what was the amount of notes payable related to u.s . commercial paper?', 'what was the full total of notes payable?', 'how much, then, in relation to this total did that amount represent?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax . these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions . unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax . the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense . credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies . if our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million . we have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts . if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties . concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc . and its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s . retail segment . no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales . wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment . as of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s . retail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables . the five largest customers in our u.s . retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales . we enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties . we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party . these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss . we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges . the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral . under the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk . collateral assets are either cash or u.s . treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults . note 8 . debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 27 2012 notes payable</td><td>may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate</td><td>may 27 2012 notespayable</td><td>weighted-averageinterest rate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . commercial paper</td><td>$ 412.0</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>$ 192.5</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>financial institutions</td><td>114.5</td><td>10.0</td><td>118.8</td><td>11.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 526.5</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>$ 311.3</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr></table> to ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings . commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing . we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe . in april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility . | ['12.636', '412.0', '526.5', '0.78253'] |
['what was the net change in value of net earnings attributable to pmi from 2016 to 2017?', 'what was the 2016 value?', 'what is the change over the 2016 value?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to pmi</td><td>$ 6035</td><td>$ 6967</td><td>$ 6873</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards</td><td>14</td><td>19</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net earnings for basic and diluted eps</td><td>$ 6021</td><td>$ 6948</td><td>$ 6849</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average shares for basic eps</td><td>1552</td><td>1551</td><td>1549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )</td><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted-average shares for diluted eps</td><td>1553</td><td>1551</td><td>1549</td></tr></table> for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. . | ['-932.0', '6967.0', '-0.13377'] |
['in 2008, what percentage did the tier 2 capital represent in relation to the total one?', 'and how much did it represent in relation to the total of risk-weighted assets?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) . credit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . unexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained . the capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation . credit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation . actual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . statistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate . market risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices . daily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels . the firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures . see market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures . operational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis . the operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts . the firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework . private equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations . in addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk . the capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions . regulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company . the office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a . the federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired . the amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 . the occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a . similar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements . jpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below . for more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report . risk-based capital components and assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total tier 1capital ( a )</td><td>$ 136104</td><td>$ 88746</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total tier 2 capital</td><td>48616</td><td>43496</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 184720</td><td>$ 132242</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-weighted assets</td><td>$ 1244659</td><td>$ 1051879</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total adjusted average assets</td><td>1966895</td><td>1473541</td></tr></table> ( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies . based on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points . the ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. . | ['0.26319', '0.03906'] |
['what was the difference in amortization expense between 2008 and 2009?', 'so what was the percentage change?', 'how much did the other intangible assets net change between 2003 and 2004?', 'so what was the percentage decline during this time?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 1369607</td><td>$ 1299521</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>89736</td><td>111484</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>43404</td><td>43125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1502747</td><td>1454130</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td><td>-434381 ( 434381 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 985303</td><td>$ 1019749</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv . | ['1.9', '0.01981', '-34446.0', '-0.03378'] |
['what percentage of the total dividend in 2019 is from the first quarter?', 'and what percentage of the total dividend in 2018 is from the first quarter?', 'what is, then, the difference between the 2019 percentage and this 2018 one?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 1.10</td><td>$ .95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 4.58</td><td>$ 4.25</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 . at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. . | ['0.24017', '0.22353', '0.01665'] |
['what is the price of ball corporation in 2010?', 'what is that less an initial $100 investment?', 'what is that difference over 100?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 110.86</td><td>$ 115.36</td><td>$ 107.58</td><td>$ 134.96</td><td>$ 178.93</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj containers & packaging index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 112.09</td><td>$ 119.63</td><td>$ 75.00</td><td>$ 105.34</td><td>$ 123.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.80</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td></tr></table> . | ['178.93', '78.93', '0.7893'] |
['what was the total net change in net fair value of derivatives outstanding between 2007 and 2008?', 'and the percentage change during this time?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions . oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil . oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million . the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes . for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated . oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk . oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations . oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities . in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided . when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk . at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business . distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas . gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism . energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations . we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges . we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments . both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value . fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 25171</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period</td><td>-55874 ( 55874 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period</td><td>236772</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other changes in fair value</td><td>52731</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )</td><td>$ 258800</td></tr></table> ( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy . the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 . fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es . | ['233629.0', '9.28167'] |
['what was the total value of the shares purchased in october?', 'and what was it for november?', 'how much does the october total value represent in relation to the november one?', 'and how much is that in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share2</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1-31</td><td>29704</td><td>$ 5.99</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1-30</td><td>4468</td><td>$ 3.24</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1-31</td><td>12850</td><td>$ 3.98</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total1</td><td>47022</td><td>$ 5.18</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. . | ['177926.96', '14476.32', '12.2909', '1229.08971'] |
['what is the ratio of the payment amount per share, 2017 to 2016?', 'what is that less 1?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 . stockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>paymentdate</td><td>amountper share</td><td>totalamount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 1.14</td><td>$ 170</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 1.16</td><td>$ 172</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 1.49</td><td>$ 216</td></tr></table> on november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million . declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . stock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 . under the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . pursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards . accordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program . on february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement . we also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 . on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co . llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above . on february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock . the payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr . upon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million . in addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock . subsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. . | ['1.28448', '0.28448'] |
['what is the ratio of common stock outstanding shares post split to prior?', 'what is 1 less that quotient?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) . as a result of the reverse stock split , every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share . the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 . on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation . the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders . the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date . the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation . see disposition of retained shares in note c to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . the prices listed below for those dates prior to november 1 , 2016 reflect stock trading prices of alcoa inc . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to the company 2019s post-separation prices. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>2017 high</td><td>2017 low</td><td>2017 dividend</td><td>2017 high</td><td>2017 low</td><td>dividend</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first</td><td>$ 30.69</td><td>$ 18.64</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 30.66</td><td>$ 18.42</td><td>$ 0.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second</td><td>28.65</td><td>21.76</td><td>0.06</td><td>34.50</td><td>26.34</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third</td><td>26.84</td><td>22.67</td><td>0.06</td><td>32.91</td><td>27.09</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )</td><td>27.85</td><td>22.74</td><td>0.06</td><td>32.10</td><td>16.75</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>year</td><td>$ 30.69</td><td>$ 18.64</td><td>$ 0.24</td><td>$ 34.50</td><td>$ 16.75</td><td>$ 0.36</td></tr></table> the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12271 as of february 16 , 2018. . | ['0.30769', '0.69231'] |
['what was the fair value in 2011?', 'and what was it in 2010?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'what was the fair value in 2010?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2010 fair value, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining . | ['99832.0', '81881.0', '17951.0', '81881.0', '0.21923'] |
['what is the net change of securities between 2008 and 2009?', 'what is the fair value of securities in 2008?', 'what percentage change does this represent?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 72699</td><td>$ 54163</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>74843</td><td>60786</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -2144 ( 2144 )</td><td>$ -6623 ( 6623 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -1316 ( 1316 )</td><td>$ -4057 ( 4057 )</td></tr></table> the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income . the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) . the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 . such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income . national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current . management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) . as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities . additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. . | ['18536.0', '54163.0', '0.34223'] |
['what was the return for united parcel service inc . in 2006?', 'and what was the change in that return from 2001 to 2006?', 'how much, then, does that change represent in relation to the return of that stock in 2001, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/01</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 117.19</td><td>$ 140.49</td><td>$ 163.54</td><td>$ 146.35</td><td>$ 148.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 77.90</td><td>$ 100.24</td><td>$ 111.15</td><td>$ 116.61</td><td>$ 135.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.52</td><td>$ 116.70</td><td>$ 149.06</td><td>$ 166.42</td><td>$ 182.76</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. . | ['148.92', '48.92', '0.4892'] |
['what is the assumed fmv of a share?', 'under the pre-december 31 , 2007 plan what would have been the value correspondent to a third of that fmv?', 'in order to determine the number of shares that can be bought by each non-employee director, what would be the value that gets divided by this third of the fmv?', 'and what would be, then, that number of shares that can be bought?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 4 . stock options and other stock plans we have 100962 options outstanding under the 1993 stock option and retention stock plan of union pacific corporation ( 1993 plan ) . there are 7140 restricted shares outstanding under the 1992 restricted stock plan for non-employee directors of union pacific corporation . we no longer grant options or awards of retention shares and units under these plans . in april 2000 , the shareholders approved the union pacific corporation 2000 directors plan ( directors plan ) whereby 1100000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to our non-employee directors . under the directors plan , each non-employee director , upon his or her initial election to the board of directors , receives a grant of 2000 shares of retention shares or retention stock units . prior to december 31 , 2007 , each non-employee director received annually an option to purchase at fair value a number of shares of our common stock , not to exceed 10000 shares during any calendar year , determined by dividing 60000 by 1/3 of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of such board of directors meeting , with the resulting quotient rounded up or down to the nearest 50 shares . as of december 31 , 2009 , 18000 restricted shares were outstanding under the directors plan and 292000 options were outstanding under the directors plan . the union pacific corporation 2001 stock incentive plan ( 2001 plan ) was approved by the shareholders in april 2001 . the 2001 plan reserved 24000000 shares of our common stock for issuance to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries in the form of non-qualified options , incentive stock options , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards . non-employee directors were not eligible for awards under the 2001 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 3366230 options were outstanding under the 2001 plan . we no longer grant any stock options or other stock or unit awards under this plan . the union pacific corporation 2004 stock incentive plan ( 2004 plan ) was approved by shareholders in april 2004 . the 2004 plan reserved 42000000 shares of our common stock for issuance , plus any shares subject to awards made under the 2001 plan and the 1993 plan that were outstanding on april 16 , 2004 , and became available for regrant pursuant to the terms of the 2004 plan . under the 2004 plan , non- qualified options , stock appreciation rights , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards may be granted to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries . non-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 2004 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 8939710 options and 3778997 retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2004 plan . pursuant to the above plans 33559150 ; 36961123 ; and 38601728 shares of our common stock were authorized and available for grant at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . stock options 2013 we estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the black-scholes option pricing model . groups of employees and non-employee directors that have similar historical and expected exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the table below shows the annual weighted-average assumptions used for valuation purposes : weighted-average assumptions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>weighted-average assumptions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.1</td><td>5.3</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volatility</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>22.2% ( 22.2 % )</td><td>20.9% ( 20.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted</td><td>$ 11.33</td><td>$ 13.35</td><td>$ 11.19</td></tr></table> . | ['2000.0', '666.66667', '60000.0', '90.0'] |
['what was the total deferred compensation plan investments in 2011?', 'and in 2010?', 'so what was the difference between these two values?', 'and the percentage increase during this time?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: contingent consideration of up to $ 13.8 million . the contingent consideration arrangement requires additional cash payments to the former equity holders of lyric upon the achievement of certain technological and product development milestones payable during the period from june 2011 through june 2016 . the company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement utilizing the income approach . changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change . as of october 29 , 2011 , no contingent payments have been made and the fair value of the contingent consideration was approximately $ 14.0 million . the company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition , resulting in the recognition of $ 12.2 million of ipr&d , $ 18.9 million of goodwill and $ 3.3 million of net deferred tax liabilities . the goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that have yet to be determined as well as the assembled workforce of lyric . future technologies do not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are a part of future development and growth of the business . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in addition , the company will be obligated to pay royalties to the former equity holders of lyric on revenue recognized from the sale of lyric products and licenses through the earlier of 20 years or the accrual of a maximum of $ 25 million . royalty payments to lyric employees require post-acquisition services to be rendered and , as such , the company will record these amounts as compensation expense in the related periods . as of october 29 , 2011 , no royalty payments have been made . the company recognized $ 0.2 million of acquisition-related costs that were expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . these costs are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income . the company has not provided pro forma results of operations for integrant , audioasics and lyric herein as they were not material to the company on either an individual or an aggregate basis . the company included the results of operations of each acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the date of such acquisition . 7 . deferred compensation plan investments investments in the analog devices , inc . deferred compensation plan ( the deferred compensation plan ) are classified as trading . the components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>money market funds</td><td>$ 17187</td><td>$ 1840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mutual funds</td><td>9223</td><td>6850</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deferred compensation plan investments</td><td>$ 26410</td><td>$ 8690</td></tr></table> the fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , respectively . adjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses . gross realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading securities were not material in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . the company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts owed to the deferred compensation plan participants ( see note 10 ) . these investments are specifically designated as available to the company solely for the purpose of paying benefits under the deferred compensation plan . however , in the event the company became insolvent , the investments would be available to all unsecured general creditors . 8 . other investments other investments consist of equity securities and other long-term investments . investments are stated at fair value , which is based on market quotes or on a cost-basis , dependent on the nature of the investment , as appropriate . adjustments to the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded as an increase or decrease analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . | ['26410.0', '8690.0', '17720.0', '2.03913'] |
['what was the difference in the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred between 2013 and 2014?', 'and the value for 2013 again?', 'so what is the percentage change during this time?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2014 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td><td>dec . 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 877</td><td>$ 803</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>438</td><td>356</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>412</td><td>491</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>409</td><td>385</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>249</td><td>207</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>178</td><td>169</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>100</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>640</td><td>579</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3303</td><td>$ 3086</td></tr></table> . | ['0.1', '2.3', '0.04348'] |
['what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?', 'and what was it in 2007?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2007 carrying amount, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses . none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment . significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party . citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met . the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>2008 loans</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>loans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 16254</td><td>$ 2315</td><td>$ 26020</td><td>$ 3038</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value</td><td>$ 6501</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 899</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 1113</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 1292</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ -4 ( 4 )</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments . as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method . the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity . since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting . thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings . these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . . | ['16254.0', '26020.0', '-9766.0', '-0.37533'] |
['what is the net change in total maximum exposure to loss fro vies from 2016 to 2017?', 'what is the percent change?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 . operations and summary of significant accounting policies a . nature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations . financial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment . this category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc . ( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries . our products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d . we conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition . we place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support . although no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products . our machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries . reciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products . some of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries . the fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries . some of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries . our dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business . some products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company . at times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives . the financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions . financing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies . we offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company . a significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east . b . basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc . and its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest . investments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method . see note 9 for further discussion . we consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc . is the primary beneficiary . for vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie . see note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie . we have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary . although we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity . our maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>receivables - trade and other</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables - finance</td><td>42</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term receivables - finance</td><td>38</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies</td><td>39</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>guarantees</td><td>259</td><td>210</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 412</td><td>$ 716</td></tr></table> in addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary . although we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance . our maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided . these risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. . | ['-304.0', '-0.42458'] |
['what is the price of jpmorgan chase in 2014?', 'what is that less an initial $100 investment?', 'what is that change over 100?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s . equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.30</td><td>$ 81.87</td><td>$ 111.49</td><td>$ 152.42</td><td>$ 167.48</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>123.36</td><td>94.75</td><td>125.91</td><td>173.45</td><td>189.69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>112.13</td><td>93.00</td><td>119.73</td><td>162.34</td><td>186.98</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.06</td><td>117.48</td><td>136.27</td><td>180.39</td><td>205.07</td></tr></table> . | ['167.48', '67.48', '0.6748'] |
['what is the value of non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005?', 'what is that expressed as a positive number?', 'what is that divided by the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: with apb no . 25 . instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations . sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 . we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no . 25 2019s intrinsic value method . as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees . we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 . tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law . tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) . we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 . this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates . sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required . we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises . due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions . in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no . 107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r . this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies . the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided . we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no . 107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r . information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 139590</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 498266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>-524804 ( 524804 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>558360</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 531822</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ -30584 ( 30584 )</td></tr></table> . | ['30584.0', '-30584.0', '-0.05751'] |
['what is the total number of securities approved by security holders?', 'what about the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?', 'what proportion does this represent?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>448859</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>4087587</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>448859</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>4087587</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. . | ['4536446.0', '448859.0', '0.09895'] |
['between the years of 2011 and 2012, what was the change in rent expenses?', 'and what was this change between 2010 and 2011?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: at december 31 , 2012 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 198</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 106</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ 50</td><td>$ 141</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>3213</td><td>828</td><td>722</td><td>620</td><td>808</td><td>2654</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3411</td><td>$ 964</td><td>$ 828</td><td>$ 690</td><td>$ 858</td><td>$ 2795</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 92 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2012 . one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minneso- ta . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . international paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site . accordingly , it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . also in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site . the suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint , and for future remediation costs . the suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st . regis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling . also named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company . in mid-2011 , the suit was . | ['26.0', '-5.0'] |
['what was the net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders in 2008?', 'and what was it in 2007?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'what was the net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders in 2007?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2007 amount, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 54| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 net income ( loss ) per common share basic net income ( loss ) per common share is computed by dividing net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders , less dividends on share-based awards expected to vest , by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period . diluted net income ( loss ) per common share is computed by dividing the sum of basic net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders and the noncontrolling interest in earnings allocable to units not owned by us ( to the extent the units are dilutive ) , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and , to the extent they are dilutive , limited partnership units outstanding , as well as any potential dilutive securities for the period . during the first quarter of 2009 , we adopted a new accounting standard ( fasb asc 260-10 ) on participating securities , which we have applied retrospectively to prior period calculations of basic and diluted earnings per common share . pursuant to this new standard , certain of our share-based awards are considered participating securities because they earn dividend equivalents that are not forfeited even if the underlying award does not vest . the following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income ( loss ) per common share ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders</td><td>$ -333601 ( 333601 )</td><td>$ 50408</td><td>$ 211942</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : dividends on share-based awards expected to vest</td><td>-1759 ( 1759 )</td><td>-1631 ( 1631 )</td><td>-1149 ( 1149 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders</td><td>-335360 ( 335360 )</td><td>48777</td><td>210793</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>noncontrolling interest in earnings of common unitholders ( 1 )</td><td>-</td><td>2640</td><td>13998</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>diluted net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders</td><td>$ -335360 ( 335360 )</td><td>$ 51417</td><td>$ 224791</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average number of common shares outstanding</td><td>201206</td><td>146915</td><td>139255</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>weighted average partnership units outstanding</td><td>-</td><td>7619</td><td>9204</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other potential dilutive shares ( 2 )</td><td>-</td><td>19</td><td>791</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities</td><td>201206</td><td>154553</td><td>149250</td></tr></table> weighted average number of common shares and potential diluted securities 201206 154553 149250 ( 1 ) the partnership units are anti-dilutive for the year ended december 31 , 2009 , as a result of the net loss for that period . therefore , 6687 units ( in thousands ) are excluded from the weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities for the year ended december 31 , 2009 and $ 11099 noncontrolling interest in earnings of common unitholders ( in thousands ) is excluded from diluted net loss attributable to common shareholders for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . ( 2 ) excludes ( in thousands of shares ) 7872 ; 8219 and 1144 of anti-dilutive shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively related to stock-based compensation plans . also excludes ( in thousands of shares ) the exchangeable notes that have 8089 ; 11771 and 11751 of anti-dilutive shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . federal income taxes we have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) under the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended . to qualify as a reit , we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements , including a requirement to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our adjusted taxable income to our stockholders . management intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain our reit status . as a reit , we are entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends we pay to shareholders . accordingly , we generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as we distribute an amount equal to or in excess of our taxable income currently to shareholders . we are also generally subject to federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to our shareholders . if we fail to qualify as a reit in any taxable year , we will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a reit for four subsequent taxable years . reit qualification reduces , but does not eliminate , the amount of state and local taxes we pay . in addition , our financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal , state and local income taxes . as a reit , we may also be subject to certain federal excise taxes if we engage in certain types of transactions. . | ['50408.0', '211942.0', '-161534.0', '211942.0', '-0.76216'] |
['what is the value of other sinking fund requirements times 1000?', 'what is that divided by the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding in 2007?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed . ( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st . charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 . ( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed . ( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 1150786</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 925005</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 540372</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 139952</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 475288</td></tr></table> not included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements . in december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements . in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 . covenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur . in january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project . capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. . | ['30200.0', '0.06354'] |
['in the year of 2008, what were the preliminary purchase price allocations related to contract-based intangible assets, in thousands?', 'and considering its amortization period, what was their average annual amortization expense?', 'and concerning the total assets in that same acquisition, what amount of them was due to goodwill?', 'what percentage, then, did the goodwill represent in relation to them?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in connection with these discover related purchases , we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos . contractual rights sold totaled $ 7.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008 and $ 1.0 million during fiscal 2009 . such sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months . during fiscal 2009 , we collected $ 4.4 million of such proceeds , which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows . we do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale . proceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense . during fiscal 2009 , we recognized $ 1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities . other 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a . and euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain . lfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america . the purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations . during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states . the purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 13536</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>4091</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>1031</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>267</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current assets</td><td>502</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>19427</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>minority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost )</td><td>-486 ( 486 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 16594</td></tr></table> the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years . the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years . these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions . in addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million . the value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately . the remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years . fiscal 2007 on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc asia pacific . this business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region . the . | ['1031.0', '103.1', '13536.0', '0.69676'] |
['what is the price of e*trade financial corporation in 2014 less an initial 100?', 'what is that divided by 100?', 'what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2014 less and initial 100?', 'what is that divided by 100?', 'what is the difference of the e*trade percent change and the s&p percent change?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/09</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>90.91</td><td>45.23</td><td>50.85</td><td>111.59</td><td>137.81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.06</td><td>117.49</td><td>136.30</td><td>180.44</td><td>205.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones us financials index</td><td>100.00</td><td>112.72</td><td>98.24</td><td>124.62</td><td>167.26</td><td>191.67</td></tr></table> table of contents . | ['37.81', '0.3781', '105.14', '1.0514', '-0.6733'] |
['what is the value of total accumulated other comprehensive losses in 2014?', 'what is the value in 2015?', 'what is the net difference?', 'what is the 2015 value?', 'what is the percent change?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( losses ) earnings ( in millions )</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2015</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>currency translation adjustments</td><td>$ -6129 ( 6129 )</td><td>$ -3929 ( 3929 )</td><td>$ -2207 ( 2207 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other benefits</td><td>-3332 ( 3332 )</td><td>-3020 ( 3020 )</td><td>-2046 ( 2046 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives accounted for as hedges</td><td>59</td><td>123</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total accumulated other comprehensive losses</td><td>$ -9402 ( 9402 )</td><td>$ -6826 ( 6826 )</td><td>$ -4190 ( 4190 )</td></tr></table> reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 . the movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business . in addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . colombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products . the investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco . as a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement . these discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 . note 19 . rbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc . ( "rothmans" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc . ( "rbh" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand . the settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period . rothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh . the remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. . | ['9402.0', '6826.0', '2576.0', '6826.0', '0.37738'] |
['what is the statutory net income bermuda subsidiaries in 2010?', 'what about 2009?', 'what is the net change?', 'what growth rate does this represent?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: n o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares , 1230881 shares , and 638401 shares , respectively . 19 . related party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda . the trustees are principally comprised of ace management . the company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda , the balance of which was $ 30 million and $ 31 million , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate , some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent , professional real estate appraisers . the borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities . accordingly , the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan , including the real estate properties . 20 . statutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate . these regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities . there are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries . the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators . statutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items . the statutory capital and surplus of the u.s . subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 . the amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 850 million . the following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s . subsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2010</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2009</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2008</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2010</td><td>bermuda subsidiaries 2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory capital and surplus</td><td>$ 11798</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6266</td><td>$ 5885</td><td>$ 5368</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>statutory net income</td><td>$ 2430</td><td>$ 2369</td><td>$ 2196</td><td>$ 1047</td><td>$ 904</td><td>$ 818</td></tr></table> as permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 206 million , $ 215 million , and $ 211 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , respectively . the company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations . some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements . in some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business . these licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests . jurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements. . | ['2430.0', '2369.0', '61.0', '0.02575'] |
['in the year of 2009, considering the percentage of the total facilities the bbb/baa ones represented, if there had been 50 facilities, how many of them would have been bbb/baa?', 'and between 2008 and 2009, what was the change in that percentage of the bbb/baa?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>december 312008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aaa/aaa</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>19% ( 19 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aa/aa</td><td>50</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>a/a</td><td>34</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>bbb/baa</td><td>2</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies . all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels . we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders . based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet . we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events . we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred . tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code . the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act . the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants . generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity . we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member . also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) . in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund . the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability . general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio . we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary . the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability . the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows . we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary . the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests . neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit . the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment . we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc . these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table . the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss . our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results . we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet . in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments . these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a . in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit . the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us . in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes . the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities . we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities . accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and . | ['1.0', '-1.0'] |
['what was the change in the interest income from 2014 to 2015?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that interest income in 2014?', 'how much is that in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ -33.7 ( 33.7 )</td><td>$ 34.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>-35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>36.6</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 . we had $ 1509.7 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2015 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2015 and 2014 , we had interest income of $ 22.8 and $ 27.4 , respectively . based on our 2015 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 15.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2015 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2015 included the australian dollar , brazilian real , british pound sterling and euro . based on 2015 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2015 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. . | ['4.6', '0.16788', '16.78832'] |
['what was the change in net revenue for entergy texas in 2007?', 'and the growth rate during this time?', 'what was the change in net revenue for entergy texas in 2007?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds . the recovery became effective july 2007 . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 403.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>13.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>9.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>6.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>base revenue</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr></table> the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . as discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period . retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 . the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds . the decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas . the receipt of such payments is being . | ['39.0', '0.0967', '39.0'] |
['as of december 31, 2008, what was the total liability from the 2003 and the 2007 program, combined?', 'including the 2001 program, what becomes this total liability?', 'and what was the average liability between those three years?', 'and concerning that total liability, by how much did it change since the end of 2006?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2007 program</td><td>2003 program</td><td>2001 program</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liability at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 12.6</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>$ 31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments</td><td>19.1</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>13.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td><td>-3.1 ( 3.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 11.9</td><td>$ 9.0</td><td>$ 8.7</td><td>$ 29.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net charges and adjustments</td><td>4.3</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.7</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-15.0 ( 15.0 )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>-3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liability at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 5.9</td><td>$ 12.8</td></tr></table> 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. . | ['6.9', '12.8', '4.26667', '-19.0'] |
['what is the proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures in 2015?', 'what is the value in 2014?', 'what is the sum of those 2 years?', 'what is the value in 2013?', 'what is the total sum for all 3 years?', 'what is that divided by 3?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: proportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests . the proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below . upon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities . see note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance . beginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows . the proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below . we also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms . an example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker . see item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments . the gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities . we believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes . factors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company . the presentation of free cash flow has material limitations . proportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap . proportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments . our definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies . calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2015/2014 change</td><td>2014/2013 change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2134</td><td>$ 1791</td><td>$ 2715</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ -924 ( 924 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )</td><td>165</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>165</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>adjusted operating cash flow</td><td>2299</td><td>1791</td><td>2715</td><td>508</td><td>-924 ( 924 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td><td>-359 ( 359 )</td><td>-834 ( 834 )</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>proportional adjusted operating cash flow</td><td>1741</td><td>1432</td><td>1881</td><td>309</td><td>-449 ( 449 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )</td><td>-449 ( 449 )</td><td>-485 ( 485 )</td><td>-535 ( 535 )</td><td>36</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )</td><td>-51 ( 51 )</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td><td>5</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>proportional free cash flow</td><td>$ 1241</td><td>$ 891</td><td>$ 1271</td><td>$ 350</td><td>$ -380 ( 380 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric . ( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures . for example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary . thus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest . assuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) . the company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation . the proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur . ( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . the company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 . ( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. . | ['205.0', '163.0', '368.0', '110.0', '478.0', '159.33333'] |
['what is the total capital in 2008 less tier 1 capital?', 'what is total capital from 2007?', 'what is tier 1 capital in 2007?', 'what is the difference of total capital and tier 1 in 2007?', 'what is the ratio of the differences in capital from 2008 to 2007?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts ( trust preferred securities ) , which qualify as tier 1 capital , were $ 23.899 billion at december 31 , 2008 , as compared to $ 23.594 billion at december 31 , 2007 . in 2008 , citigroup did not issue any new enhanced trust preferred securities . the frb issued a final rule , with an effective date of april 11 , 2005 , which retains trust preferred securities in tier 1 capital of bank holding companies , but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards . under the rule , after a five-year transition period , the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other restricted core capital elements included in tier 1 capital of internationally active banking organizations , such as citigroup , would be limited to 15% ( 15 % ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill , less any associated deferred tax liability . the amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in tier 2 capital , subject to restrictions . at december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) against the limit . the company expects to be within restricted core capital limits prior to the implementation date of march 31 , 2009 . the frb permits additional securities , such as the equity units sold to adia , to be included in tier 1 capital up to 25% ( 25 % ) ( including the restricted core capital elements in the 15% ( 15 % ) limit ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability . at december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) against the limit . the frb granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting sfas 158 at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . the frb and the ffiec may propose amendments to , and issue interpretations of , risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions . these may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-weighted assets . capital resources of citigroup 2019s depository institutions citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions in the united states are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies , which are similar to the frb 2019s guidelines . to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , citigroup 2019s depository institutions must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) and a leverage ratio of at least 5% ( 5 % ) , and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels . at december 31 , 2008 , all of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions were 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal regulatory agencies 2019 definitions , including citigroup 2019s primary depository institution , citibank , n.a. , as noted in the following table : citibank , n.a . components of capital and ratios under regulatory guidelines in billions of dollars at year end 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars at year end</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>$ 71.0</td><td>$ 82.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )</td><td>108.4</td><td>121.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>9.94% ( 9.94 % )</td><td>8.98% ( 8.98 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total capital ratio ( tier 1 and tier 2 )</td><td>15.18</td><td>13.33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>leverage ratio ( 1 )</td><td>5.82</td><td>6.65</td></tr></table> leverage ratio ( 1 ) 5.82 6.65 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets . citibank , n.a . had a net loss for 2008 amounting to $ 6.2 billion . during 2008 , citibank , n.a . received contributions from its parent company of $ 6.1 billion . citibank , n.a . did not issue any additional subordinated notes in 2008 . total subordinated notes issued to citicorp holdings inc . that were outstanding at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 and included in citibank , n.a . 2019s tier 2 capital , amounted to $ 28.2 billion . citibank , n.a . received an additional $ 14.3 billion in capital contribution from its parent company in january 2009 . the impact of this contribution is not reflected in the table above . the substantial events in 2008 impacting the capital of citigroup , and the potential future events discussed on page 94 under 201ccitigroup regulatory capital ratios , 201d also affected , or could affect , citibank , n.a. . | ['37.4', '121.6', '82.0', '39.6', '0.94444'] |
['what were, in millions, the total catastrophe losses in the years of 2009 and 2010, combined?', 'and what were those catastrophe losses in 2008, also in millions?', 'including, then, 2008, what then becomes that total of losses?', 'and what is the average of catastrophe losses between the three years, in millions?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following table shows the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums and the impact of prior period development on our consolidated loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loss and loss expense ratio as reported</td><td>59.2% ( 59.2 % )</td><td>58.8% ( 58.8 % )</td><td>60.6% ( 60.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums</td><td>( 3.2 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 1.2 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 4.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>prior period development</td><td>4.6% ( 4.6 % )</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td><td>6.8% ( 6.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>large assumed loss portfolio transfers</td><td>( 0.3 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 0.8 ) % ( % )</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loss and loss expense ratio adjusted</td><td>60.3% ( 60.3 % )</td><td>61.7% ( 61.7 % )</td><td>62.7% ( 62.7 % )</td></tr></table> we recorded net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 366 million in 2010 compared with net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 137 million and $ 567 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the catastrophe losses for 2010 were primarily related to weather- related events in the u.s. , earthquakes in chile , mexico , and new zealand , and storms in australia and europe . the catastrophe losses for 2009 were primarily related to an earthquake in asia , floods in europe , several weather-related events in the u.s. , and a european windstorm . for 2008 , the catastrophe losses were primarily related to hurricanes gustav and ike . prior period development arises from changes to loss estimates recognized in the current year that relate to loss reserves first reported in previous calendar years and excludes the effect of losses from the development of earned premium from pre- vious accident years . we experienced $ 503 million of net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments in 2010 . this compares with net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments of $ 576 million and $ 814 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . refer to 201cprior period development 201d for more information . the adjusted loss and loss expense ratio declined in 2010 , compared with 2009 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , non-recurring premium adjustment and the reduction in assumed loss portfolio business , which is written at higher loss ratios than other types of business . our policy acquisition costs include commissions , premium taxes , underwriting , and other costs that vary with , and are primarily related to , the production of premium . administrative expenses include all other operating costs . our policy acquis- ition cost ratio increased in 2010 , compared with 2009 . the increase was primarily related to the impact of crop settlements , which generated higher profit-share commissions and a lower adjustment to net premiums earned , as well as the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in connection with catastrophe activity and changes in business mix . our administrative expense ratio increased in 2010 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , reinstatement premiums expensed , and increased costs in our international operations . although the crop settlements generate minimal administrative expenses , they resulted in lower adjustment to net premiums earned in 2010 , compared with 2009 . administrative expenses in 2010 , were partially offset by higher net results generated by our third party claims administration business , esis , the results of which are included within our administrative expenses . esis generated $ 85 million in net results in 2010 , compared with $ 26 million in 2009 . the increase is primarily from non-recurring sources . our policy acquisition cost ratio was stable in 2009 , compared with 2008 , as increases in our combined insurance operations were offset by more favorable final crop year settlement of profit share commissions . administrative expenses increased in 2009 , primarily due to the inclusion of administrative expenses related to combined insurance for the full year and costs associated with new product expansion in our domestic retail operation and in our personal lines business . our effective income tax rate , which we calculate as income tax expense divided by income before income tax , is depend- ent upon the mix of earnings from different jurisdictions with various tax rates . a change in the geographic mix of earnings would change the effective income tax rate . our effective income tax rate was 15 percent in 2010 , compared with 17 percent and 24 percent in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the decrease in our effective income tax rate in 2010 , was primarily due to a change in the mix of earnings to lower tax-paying jurisdictions , a decrease in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits which was the result of a settlement with the u.s . internal revenue service appeals division regarding federal tax returns for the years 2002-2004 , and the recognition of a non-taxable gain related to the acquisition of rain and hail . the 2009 year included a reduction of a deferred tax valuation allowance related to investments . for 2008 , our effective income tax rate was adversely impacted by a change in mix of earnings due to the impact of catastrophe losses in lower tax-paying jurisdictions . prior period development the favorable prior period development , inclusive of the life segment , of $ 512 million during 2010 was the net result of sev- eral underlying favorable and adverse movements . with respect to ace 2019s crop business , ace regularly receives reports from its managing general agent ( mga ) relating to the previous crop year ( s ) in subsequent calendar quarters and this typically results . | ['503.0', '567.0', '1070.0', '356.66667'] |
['what was the difference between the highest and the lowest future benefit payment made for the postretirement benefit plans?', 'and concerning the defined contribution plans in various foreign countries, what was their amount in 2008?', 'what was it in 2007?', 'by how much, then, did it increase over the year?', 'and what was this increase as a percent of the 2007 amount?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) cash flows for 2010 , we expect to contribute $ 25.2 and $ 9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans , respectively . a significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k . pension plan . additionally , we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k . pension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010 . as a result , we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years . during 2009 , we contributed $ 31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible . the following estimated future benefit payments , which reflect future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid in the years indicated below . domestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domestic pension plans</td><td>foreign pension plans</td><td>postretirement benefit plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 17.2</td><td>$ 23.5</td><td>$ 5.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>11.1</td><td>24.7</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>10.8</td><td>26.4</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>10.5</td><td>28.2</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>10.5</td><td>32.4</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>48.5</td><td>175.3</td><td>24.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 . federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively . expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively . we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated . the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively . in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit . | ['19.3', '28.7', '26.7', '2.0', '0.07491'] |
['what is the value of advance auto parts stock in 2009 less 100?', 'what is the percent change?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 29 2007</td><td>january 3 2009</td><td>january 2 2010</td><td>january 1 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>advance auto parts</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 108.00</td><td>$ 97.26</td><td>$ 116.01</td><td>$ 190.41</td><td>$ 201.18</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>104.24</td><td>65.70</td><td>78.62</td><td>88.67</td><td>88.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>100.00</td><td>82.15</td><td>58.29</td><td>82.36</td><td>101.84</td><td>104.81</td></tr></table> stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 . | ['-2.74', '-0.0274'] |
['what is the current ratio of robert mondavi?', 'what were the remaining mondovi net assets acquired following the sale of certain excess assets from the deal?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: c o n s t e l l a t i o n b r a n d s , i n c . baroness philippine de rothschild announced an agree- ment to maintain equal ownership of opus one . opus one produces fine wines at its napa valley winery . the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the premium , super-premium and fine wine categories . the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally . the vast majority of sales from these brands are generated in the united states . the company is leveraging the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure . the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure . the robert mondavi acquisition supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets . the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the growing premium , super-premium and fine wine sectors within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets . in particular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom and other 201cnew world 201d wine markets . total con- sideration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million . additionally , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 12.0 million . the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) . in accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition . the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the robert mondavi business , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies . the results of operations of the robert mondavi busi- ness are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the acquisition date . the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition , as adjusted for the final appraisal : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 513782</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>438140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other assets</td><td>124450</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>138000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill</td><td>634203</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1848575</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>310919</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>long-term liabilities</td><td>494995</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>805914</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 1042661</td></tr></table> the trademarks are not subject to amortization . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . following the robert mondavi acquisition , the company sold certain of the acquired vineyard properties and related assets , investments accounted for under the equity method , and other winery properties and related assets , during the years ended february 28 , 2006 , and february 28 , 2005 . the company realized net proceeds of $ 170.8 million from the sale of these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 . amounts realized during the year ended february 28 , 2005 , were not material . no gain or loss has been recognized upon the sale of these assets . hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock . as a result of the acquisi- tion of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 . the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in wineries and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s marketing and sales operations in the united kingdom . in october 2005 , pwp was merged into another subsidiary of the company . total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million . additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million . the acquisition date for accounting pur- poses is march 27 , 2003 . the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consideration . this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 . the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 million ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing bridge loan agreement . addi- tionally , the company issued 6577826 shares of the com- pany 2019s class a common stock , which were valued at $ 77.2 million based on the simple average of the closing market price of the company 2019s class a common stock beginning two days before and ending two days after april 4 , 2003 , the day the hardy shareholders elected the form of consid- eration they wished to receive . the purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis that contemplated , among other things , the value of a broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets and a presence in the important australian winemaking regions . the company and hardy have complementary businesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy . the hardy acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories . | ['1.65246', '1042490.2'] |
['what is the value of net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2015?', 'what is the 2014 value?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is the net change over the 2014 value?', 'what is that times 100?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 848.2</td><td>$ 831.2</td><td>$ 598.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital2</td><td>-117.5 ( 117.5 )</td><td>-131.1 ( 131.1 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash</td><td>-56.7 ( 56.7 )</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 674.0</td><td>$ 669.5</td><td>$ 592.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-202.8 ( 202.8 )</td><td>-200.8 ( 200.8 )</td><td>-224.5 ( 224.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-472.8 ( 472.8 )</td><td>-343.9 ( 343.9 )</td><td>-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 . our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware . net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. . | ['848.2', '831.2', '17.0', '0.02045', '2.04524'] |
['what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2015?', 'what was the price in 2010?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is that change over 100?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loews common stock</td><td>100.0</td><td>97.37</td><td>106.04</td><td>126.23</td><td>110.59</td><td>101.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.45</td><td>156.82</td><td>178.29</td><td>180.75</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loews peer group ( a )</td><td>100.0</td><td>101.59</td><td>115.19</td><td>145.12</td><td>152.84</td><td>144.70</td></tr></table> ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. . | ['180.75', '100.0', '80.75', '0.8075'] |
['what is the 2015 value of outstanding fuel hedges less the 2014 value?', 'what is the 2014 value?', 'what is the change over the 2014 value?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 . financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices . these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) . the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>gallons hedged</td><td>weighted average contractprice per gallon</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>27000000</td><td>$ 3.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>12000000</td><td>2.92</td></tr></table> if the national u.s . on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty . if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty . the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) . the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were current liabilities of $ 37.8 million and $ 34.4 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets . the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 respectively , and a gain of less than $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income . total ( loss ) gain recognized in other comprehensive ( loss ) income for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ ( 2.0 ) million , $ ( 24.2 ) million and $ 2.4 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated cardboard and old newspaper . from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities . we had no outstanding recycling commodity hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 . no amounts were recognized in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income for the ineffective portion of the changes in fair values during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income for recycling commodity hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 0.1 million and $ ( 0.1 ) million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . no amount was recognized in other comprehensive income for 2015 . fair value measurements in measuring fair values of assets and liabilities , we use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs ( level 1 ) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) . we also use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability , including assumptions about risk when appropriate. . | ['3.4', '34.4', '0.09884'] |
['what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2015?', 'and what was it in 2014?', 'by how much, then, did it change over the year?', 'and how much did this change represent in relation to the 2014 total, in percentage?', 'and throughout the subsequent year of this period, what was that change in this total?', 'what is this change as a percentage of the 2015 unrecognized tax benefits?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 373</td><td>$ 394</td><td>$ 392</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for current year tax positions</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>1</td><td>12</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effects of foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 369</td><td>$ 373</td><td>$ 394</td></tr></table> the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years . the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded . while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits . however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty . it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 . our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted . 22 . discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo . the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 . in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares . aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance . the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 . we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul . prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell . however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group . on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration . upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million . the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion . this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million . sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively . sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million . prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment . as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no . 2014-08 . discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no . 2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s . wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy . | ['373.0', '394.0', '-21.0', '-0.0533', '-4.0', '-0.01072'] |
['what was the net change in value of the nasdaq from 2017 to 2018?', 'what was the 2017 value?', 'what is the percent change?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/28/2013</td><td>1/3/2015</td><td>1/2/2016</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/30/2017</td><td>12/29/2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 135.18</td><td>$ 149.39</td><td>$ 181.05</td><td>$ 300.22</td><td>$ 311.13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>112.60</td><td>113.64</td><td>133.19</td><td>172.11</td><td>165.84</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.28</td><td>109.54</td><td>129.05</td><td>157.22</td><td>150.33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.49</td><td>121.08</td><td>144.85</td><td>201.10</td><td>200.52</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . | ['-6.27', '172.11', '-0.03643'] |
['what was the price performance of the advance auto parts stock in january 2009?', 'and by how much did it change since 2006?', 'what is this change as a portion of the 2006 price performance of that stock?', 'in the same period, what was that change for the s&p500 index?', 'and what was this s&p500 index change as a portion of its 2006 price performance?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 29 2007</td><td>january 3 2009</td><td>january 2 2010</td><td>january 1 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>advance auto parts</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 108.00</td><td>$ 97.26</td><td>$ 116.01</td><td>$ 190.41</td><td>$ 201.18</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>104.24</td><td>65.70</td><td>78.62</td><td>88.67</td><td>88.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>100.00</td><td>82.15</td><td>58.29</td><td>82.36</td><td>101.84</td><td>104.81</td></tr></table> stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 . | ['97.26', '-2.74', '-0.0274', '-34.3', '-0.343'] |
['what was the performance price of the loews common stock in 2012?', 'and what was the change in that performance price from 2010 to 2012?', 'how much does this change represent in relation to the performance price of that stock in 2010?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loews common stock</td><td>100.0</td><td>97.37</td><td>106.04</td><td>126.23</td><td>110.59</td><td>101.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.45</td><td>156.82</td><td>178.29</td><td>180.75</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loews peer group ( a )</td><td>100.0</td><td>101.59</td><td>115.19</td><td>145.12</td><td>152.84</td><td>144.70</td></tr></table> ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. . | ['106.04', '6.04', '0.0604'] |
['what was the change in capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment from 2008 to 2009?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to those capital expenditures in 2008, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3547</td><td>$ 3173</td><td>$ 4421</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td><td>-1518 ( 1518 )</td><td>-907 ( 907 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-3363 ( 3363 )</td><td>-1476 ( 1476 )</td><td>-3938 ( 3938 )</td></tr></table> operating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 . the increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 . partially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan . this reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts . operating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred . the improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 . these improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 . the decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas . the increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems . the decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments . net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 . the decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million . partially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million . the decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities . investing activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments . we also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure . capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 . we expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years . acquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates . amounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates . we paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 . in 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) . there were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 . during 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 . financing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million . of the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 . in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) . under the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . we repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases . in connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program . cash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million . those activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. . | ['-74.0', '-0.07991'] |
['what was the total revenue in 2011?', 'and what was it in 2010?', 'how much, then, does the 2011 total revenue represent in relation to the 2010 one?', 'and what is the difference between this value and the number one?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies . the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 . aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding . some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 . during 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments . aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time . 17 . related party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders . these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions . during 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million . 18 . segment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions . unallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements . reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance . the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices . the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm . risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network . hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . aon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk solutions</td><td>$ 6817</td><td>$ 6423</td><td>$ 6305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>hr solutions</td><td>4501</td><td>2111</td><td>1267</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intersegment elimination</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>-26 ( 26 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total operating segments</td><td>11287</td><td>8512</td><td>7546</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unallocated</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 11287</td><td>$ 8512</td><td>$ 7595</td></tr></table> . | ['11287.0', '8512.0', '1.32601', '0.32601'] |
['what portion of the total long-term debt obligations are due to the long-term debt?', 'and what percentage of that long-term debt is due in 2020?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>payments due by fiscal year total</td><td>payments due by fiscal year 2020</td><td>payments due by fiscal year 2021 -22</td><td>payments due by fiscal year 2023 -24</td><td>payments due by fiscal year 2025 and thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 13093.0</td><td>$ 1396.3</td><td>$ 3338.4</td><td>$ 2810.2</td><td>$ 5548.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrued interest</td><td>92.6</td><td>92.6</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases ( b )</td><td>482.6</td><td>120.0</td><td>186.7</td><td>112.9</td><td>63.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capital leases</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.1</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>2961.8</td><td>2605.1</td><td>321.9</td><td>27.6</td><td>7.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>16630.3</td><td>4214.2</td><td>3847.1</td><td>2950.7</td><td>5618.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other long-term obligations ( d )</td><td>1302.4</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>$ 17932.7</td><td>$ 4214.2</td><td>$ 3847.1</td><td>$ 2950.7</td><td>$ 5618.3</td></tr></table> ( a ) amounts represent the expected cash payments of our long-term debt and do not include $ 0.3 million for capital leases or $ 72.0 million for net unamortized debt issuance costs , premiums and discounts , and fair value adjustments . ( b ) operating leases represents the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases . ( c ) the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw material and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer marketing spending commitments that support our brands . for purposes of this table , arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased , a pricing structure , and approximate timing of the transaction . most arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty and with short notice ( usually 30 days ) . any amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above . ( d ) the fair value of our foreign exchange , equity , commodity , and grain derivative contracts with a payable position to the counterparty was $ 17.3 million as of may 26 , 2019 , based on fair market values as of that date . future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future . other long-term obligations mainly consist of liabilities for accrued compensation and benefits , including the underfunded status of certain of our defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans , and miscellaneous liabilities . we expect to pay approximately $ 20 million of benefits from our unfunded postemployment benefit plans and approximately $ 18 million of deferred compensation in fiscal 2020 . we are unable to reliably estimate the amount of these payments beyond fiscal 2020 . as of may 26 , 2019 , our total liability for uncertain tax positions and accrued interest and penalties was $ 165.1 million . significant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . our significant accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations . these estimates include our accounting for promotional expenditures , valuation of long-lived assets , intangible assets , redeemable interest , stock-based compensation , income taxes , and defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans . revenue recognition our revenues are reported net of variable consideration and consideration payable to our customers , including trade promotion , consumer coupon redemption and other costs , including estimated allowances for returns , unsalable product , and prompt pay discounts . trade promotions are recorded using significant judgment of estimated participation and performance levels for offered programs at the time of sale . differences between estimated expenses and actual costs are recognized as a change in management estimate in a subsequent period . our accrued trade liabilities were $ 484 million as of may 26 , 2019 , and $ 500 million as of may 27 , 2018 . because these amounts are significant , if our estimates are inaccurate we would have to make adjustments in subsequent periods that could have a significant effect on our results of operations. . | ['0.73012', '0.10664'] |
['what is the ratio of the balance at the end of 2012 to the beginning of 2010?', 'what is that less 1?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 19 . income taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . the year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets . goodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill . see note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion . current income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction . as of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively . as of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively . the company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration . the excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation . the following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 349</td><td>$ 307</td><td>$ 285</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>4</td><td>22</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to current year</td><td>69</td><td>46</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>positions assumed in acquisitions</td><td>12</td><td>2014</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 404</td><td>$ 349</td><td>$ 307</td></tr></table> included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense . related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million . the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million . the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million . pursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits . blackrock is subject to u.s . federal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions . tax years after 2007 remain open to u.s . federal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom . with few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 . the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 . in november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material . in july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 . the tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material . the company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions . the significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 . no state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city . no state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. . | ['1.41754', '0.41754'] |
['what is the fair value per share in 2016?', 'what is it in 2015?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is the percent change?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 . common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) . under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares . these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service . in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million . these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant . under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance . the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase . under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations . the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law . the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code . the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares . the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables . the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s . treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award . expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock . the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) . the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>none</td><td>none</td><td>none</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>33% ( 33 % )</td><td>30% ( 30 % )</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>4.5</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per share</td><td>$ 31.00</td><td>$ 18.13</td><td>$ 11.75</td></tr></table> . | ['31.0', '18.13', '12.87', '0.70987'] |
['what is the total goodwill?', 'what about total assets?', 'what fraction comes from goodwill?', 'what about in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: use of estimates the preparation of the financial statements requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period . actual results could differ from those estimates . ( 3 ) significant acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions we acquired total income producing real estate related assets of $ 219.9 million , $ 948.4 million and $ 295.6 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . in december 2007 , in order to further establish our property positions around strategic port locations , we purchased a portfolio of five industrial buildings , in seattle , virginia and houston , as well as approximately 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston . the total price was $ 89.7 million and was financed in part through assumption of secured debt that had a fair value of $ 34.3 million . of the total purchase price , $ 66.1 million was allocated to in-service real estate assets , $ 20.0 million was allocated to undeveloped land and the container storage facility , $ 3.3 million was allocated to lease related intangible assets , and the remaining amount was allocated to acquired working capital related assets and liabilities . this allocation of purchase price based on the fair value of assets acquired is preliminary . the results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements . in february 2007 , we completed the acquisition of bremner healthcare real estate ( 201cbremner 201d ) , a national health care development and management firm . the primary reason for the acquisition was to expand our development capabilities within the health care real estate market . the initial consideration paid to the sellers totaled $ 47.1 million , and the sellers may be eligible for further contingent payments over the next three years . approximately $ 39.0 million of the total purchase price was allocated to goodwill , which is attributable to the value of bremner 2019s overall development capabilities and its in-place workforce . the results of operations for bremner since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements . in february 2006 , we acquired the majority of a washington , d.c . metropolitan area portfolio of suburban office and light industrial properties ( the 201cmark winkler portfolio 201d ) . the assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 867.6 million are comprised of 32 in-service properties with approximately 2.9 million square feet for rental , 166 acres of undeveloped land , as well as certain related assets of the mark winkler company , a real estate management company . the acquisition was financed primarily through assumed mortgage loans and new borrowings . the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition , as summarized below ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating rental properties</td><td>$ 602011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>land held for development</td><td>154300</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total real estate investments</td><td>756311</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>10478</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>lease related intangible assets</td><td>86047</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>14722</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>867558</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>debt assumed</td><td>-148527 ( 148527 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other liabilities assumed</td><td>-5829 ( 5829 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>purchase price net of assumed liabilities</td><td>$ 713202</td></tr></table> purchase price , net of assumed liabilities $ 713202 . | ['14722.0', '867558.0', '0.01697', '1.69695'] |
['what was the difference in total stock-based compensation expense between 2009 and 2010?', 'and the specific value for 2009 again?', 'so what was the percentage increase over this time?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: material impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% ( 1 % ) change in the assumed health care trend rate . for most of the participants in the u.s . plan , aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per annum . because of this cap , net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per year in the future . during 2007 , aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s . plan over the next three years . the impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees . 14 . stock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rsus</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>performance plans</td><td>62</td><td>60</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock options</td><td>17</td><td>21</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>employee stock purchase plans</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total stock-based compensation expense</td><td>221</td><td>209</td><td>226</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tax benefit</td><td>75</td><td>68</td><td>82</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>stock-based compensation expense net of tax</td><td>$ 146</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 144</td></tr></table> during 2009 , the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider . in connection with this conversion , a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed , which resulted in a $ 12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . stock awards stock awards , in the form of rsus , are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus . service-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant . the fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant . with certain limited exceptions , any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards . compensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period . dividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus , based on the initial grant amount . performance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees . vesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period . the performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards . the fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant . compensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest . compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs . the actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the number of units granted , based on the plan . dividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus . during 2010 , the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans . during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company granted approximately 3.5 million . | ['12.0', '209.0', '0.05742'] |
['what is the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2015?', 'what is the value at the end of 2014?', 'what is the 2015 value less the 2014?', 'what is the net change over the 2014 value?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 70.1</td><td>$ 72.0</td><td>$ 84.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to current year</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>1.4</td><td>5.0</td><td>11.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td><td>-6.0 ( 6.0 )</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-1.3 ( 1.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-1.5 ( 1.5 )</td><td>-20.7 ( 20.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 47.0</td><td>$ 70.1</td><td>$ 72.0</td></tr></table> during 2015 , we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 13.9 million . during 2014 , we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 1.5 million . during 2013 , we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years . the resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 20.7 million . included in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 are $ 30.5 million and $ 45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( net of the federal benefit on state matters ) that , if recognized , would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods . we recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income . related to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted , we recorded interest expense of approximately $ 1.2 million during 2015 and , in total as of december 31 , 2015 , have recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 10.3 million . during 2014 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.5 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2014 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 18.7 million . during 2013 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.2 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2013 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 17.0 million . gross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $ 0 to $ 10 million ; however , it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months . we are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years . these state audits are ongoing . we believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate . however , a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. . | ['47.0', '70.1', '-23.1', '-0.32953'] |
['what percentage was eurasia sbu of the total revenue in 2017?', 'at 12/31/17, with an average price per share of $12.12, what would be the cost to repurchase all the remaining shares in the program?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 on december 8 , 2017 , the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 15 , 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1 , 2018 . stock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017 . the cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31 , 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $ 1.9 billion , at an average price per share of $ 12.12 ( including a nominal amount of commissions ) . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 246 million remained available for repurchase under the program . the common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method . a total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . restricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock . the company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010 . 15 . segments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business . during the third quarter of 2017 , the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu . the management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer : us , andes , brazil , mcac and eurasia sbus . the company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus . all prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure . in february 2018 , we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio , optimize our cost structure , and reduce our carbon intensity . the company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure . corporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in "corporate and other." also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation . the company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure . adjusted ptc , a non-gaap measure , is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to ( a ) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions ; ( b ) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses ; ( c ) gains , losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests , including early plant closures ; ( d ) losses due to impairments ; ( e ) gains , losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt ; and ( f ) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program , including , but not limited to , workforce reduction efforts , relocations , and office consolidation . adjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities . the company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments . additionally , given its large number of businesses and complexity , the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results . revenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations , which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest , charges for certain management fees , and the write-off of intercompany balances , as applicable . all intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment . inter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results . the following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31,</td><td>total revenue 2017</td><td>total revenue 2016</td><td>total revenue 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>us sbu</td><td>$ 3229</td><td>$ 3429</td><td>$ 3593</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>andes sbu</td><td>2710</td><td>2506</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brazil sbu</td><td>542</td><td>450</td><td>962</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mcac sbu</td><td>2448</td><td>2172</td><td>2353</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>eurasia sbu</td><td>1590</td><td>1670</td><td>1875</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>35</td><td>77</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>eliminations</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 10530</td><td>$ 10281</td><td>$ 11260</td></tr></table> . | ['0.151', '2981.52'] |
['what is the price of tractor supply company in 2013?', 'what is the price in 2012?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is that change over 100?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/29/2012</td><td>12/28/2013</td><td>12/27/2014</td><td>12/26/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/30/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tractor supply company</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 174.14</td><td>$ 181.29</td><td>$ 201.04</td><td>$ 179.94</td><td>$ 180.52</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 134.11</td><td>$ 155.24</td><td>$ 156.43</td><td>$ 173.74</td><td>$ 211.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 147.73</td><td>$ 164.24</td><td>$ 207.15</td><td>$ 219.43</td><td>$ 286.13</td></tr></table> . | ['174.14', '100.0', '74.14', '0.7414'] |
['what is the price of citi in 2017?', 'what is that less 100?', 'what is the value of the s&p 500 in 2017?', 'what is that less 100?', 'what is the ratio of the difference of citi to the s&p 500?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>131.8</td><td>132.4</td><td>135.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>137.0</td><td>150.5</td><td>156.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>131.4</td><td>152.6</td><td>153.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>152.3</td><td>170.8</td><td>188.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2017</td><td>193.5</td><td>208.1</td><td>230.9</td></tr></table> . | ['193.5', '93.5', '208.1', '108.1', '1.15615'] |
['what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes from 2016 to 2017?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to those costs in 2016, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 . the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 . a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 . other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 . 14 . debt long-term debt consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )</td><td>2014</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )</td><td>600</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )</td><td>600</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )</td><td>84</td><td>84</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less unamortized debt issuance costs</td><td>-26 ( 26 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>1279</td><td>1278</td></tr></table> credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders . the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 . the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million . the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) . the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio . the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) . the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio . each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility . in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below . in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below . interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually . the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers . the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. . | ['-4.0', '-0.21053'] |
['what is the net change in the non-us pension plans rate from 2014 to 2015?', 'what is the rate for 2014?', 'what is the difference over the 2014 rate?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates have been discussed with our audit committee . the following is a discussion of the more significant assumptions , estimates , accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements : 2022 revenue recognition - we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists , delivery of product has occurred , the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured . for our company , this means that revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss is transferred to our customers . title transfers to our customers upon shipment or upon receipt at the customer's location as determined by the sales terms for each transaction . the company estimates the cost of sales returns based on historical experience , and these estimates are normally immaterial . 2022 goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . we perform our annual impairment analysis in the first quarter of each year . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2015 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.4 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which is comprised of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2015 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non-amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value , and any reasonable movement in the assumptions would not result in an impairment . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . 2022 marketing and advertising costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs which include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer achieving the specified targets and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . we have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to estimate our marketing programs during the past three years . 2022 employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pensions and postretirement plans are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . pension plans</td><td>4.30% ( 4.30 % )</td><td>3.95% ( 3.95 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-u.s . pension plans</td><td>1.68% ( 1.68 % )</td><td>1.92% ( 1.92 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>postretirement plans</td><td>4.45% ( 4.45 % )</td><td>4.20% ( 4.20 % )</td></tr></table> we anticipate that assumption changes , coupled with decreased amortization of deferred losses , will decrease 2016 pre-tax u.s . and non- u.s . pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 209 million as compared with approximately $ 240 million in 2015 , excluding . | ['-0.24', '1.92', '-0.125'] |
['what is the last year included in the remaining terms of the facility leases?', 'and what is the first year?', 'how many years, then, are comprehended in this period?', 'considering that the annual rent of 2003 continues through this period, what would be the total remaining obligation in all of these years?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 . income taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits . of the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions . the tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized . 6 . commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no . 45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no . 5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no . 34 ( fin no . 45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses . these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no . 5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote . the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor . product warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . while the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates . operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision . patent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products . the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims . the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions . under the provisions of fin no . 45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only . as of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 . the company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 . total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively . during the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture . these leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased . rental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively . during fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 . this lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased . future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ending march 31,</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 781</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>776</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>769</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>772</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>772</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>708</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 4578</td></tr></table> from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. . | ['2010.0', '2004.0', '6.0', '4926000.0'] |
['what is the net change in the value of total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2013 or 2014?', 'what is the value in 2013?', 'what is the net change over the 2013 value?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( losses ) earnings ( in millions )</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2015</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>currency translation adjustments</td><td>$ -6129 ( 6129 )</td><td>$ -3929 ( 3929 )</td><td>$ -2207 ( 2207 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other benefits</td><td>-3332 ( 3332 )</td><td>-3020 ( 3020 )</td><td>-2046 ( 2046 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives accounted for as hedges</td><td>59</td><td>123</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total accumulated other comprehensive losses</td><td>$ -9402 ( 9402 )</td><td>$ -6826 ( 6826 )</td><td>$ -4190 ( 4190 )</td></tr></table> reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 . the movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business . in addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . colombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products . the investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco . as a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement . these discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 . note 19 . rbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc . ( "rothmans" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc . ( "rbh" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand . the settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period . rothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh . the remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. . | ['2636.0', '4190.0', '0.62912'] |
['in the year of 2016, what percentage did the pension settlement losses represent in relation to the total of special terminations settlements and curtailments?', 'and from 2015 to that year, what was the change in the cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans?', 'how much did this change represent in relation to those contributions in 2015?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 135.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )</td><td>7.3</td><td>35.2</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate ( a )</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td><td>4.6% ( 4.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>7.4% ( 7.4 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.9% ( 3.9 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) effective in 2016 , the company began to measure the service cost and interest cost components of pension expense by applying spot rates along the yield curve to the relevant projected cash flows , as we believe this provides a better measurement of these costs . the company has accounted for this as a change in accounting estimate and , accordingly has accounted for it on a prospective basis . this change does not affect the measurement of the total benefit obligation . 2016 vs . 2015 pension expense , excluding special items , decreased from the prior year due to the adoption of the spot rate approach which reduced service cost and interest cost , the impact from expected return on assets and demographic gains , partially offset by the impact of the adoption of new mortality tables for our major plans . special items of $ 7.3 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , special termination benefits of $ 2.0 , and curtailment gains of $ 1.1 . these resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions . 2015 vs . 2014 the decrease in pension expense , excluding special items , was due to the impact from expected return on assets , a 40 bp reduction in the weighted average compensation increase assumption , and lower service cost and interest cost . the decrease was partially offset by the impact of higher amortization of actuarial losses , which resulted primarily from a 60 bp decrease in weighted average discount rate . special items of $ 35.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 21.2 , special termination benefits of $ 8.7 , and curtailment losses of $ 5.3 . these resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions . 2017 outlook in 2017 , pension expense , excluding special items , is estimated to be approximately $ 70 to $ 75 , an increase of $ 10 to $ 15 from 2016 , resulting primarily from a decrease in discount rates , offset by favorable asset experience , effects of the versum spin-off and the adoption of new mortality tables . pension settlement losses of $ 10 to $ 15 are expected , dependent on the timing of retirements . in 2017 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 164 for amortization of actuarial losses compared to $ 121 in 2016 . net actuarial losses of $ 484 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in 2016 , primarily attributable to lower discount rates and improved mortality projections . actuarial gains/losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial gains/losses and resulting amortization in years beyond 2017 . during the first quarter of 2017 , the company expects to record a curtailment loss estimated to be $ 5 to $ 10 related to employees transferring to versum . the loss will be reflected in the results from discontinued operations on the consolidated income statements . we continue to evaluate opportunities to manage the liabilities associated with our pension plans . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2016 and 2015 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 79.3 and $ 137.5 , respectively . for 2017 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 65 to $ 85 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which . | ['0.87671', '-58.2', '-0.42327'] |
['what is the sum of goodwill and customer related intangible assets?', 'what is the sum including contract based intangible assets?', 'what is the value of total assets acquired?', 'what is the total sum of intangible assets and goodwill divided by the total assets acquired?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in connection with these discover related purchases , we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos . contractual rights sold totaled $ 7.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008 and $ 1.0 million during fiscal 2009 . such sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months . during fiscal 2009 , we collected $ 4.4 million of such proceeds , which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows . we do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale . proceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense . during fiscal 2009 , we recognized $ 1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities . other 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a . and euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain . lfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america . the purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations . during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states . the purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 13536</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>4091</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>1031</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>267</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current assets</td><td>502</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>19427</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>minority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost )</td><td>-486 ( 486 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 16594</td></tr></table> the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years . the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years . these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions . in addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million . the value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately . the remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years . fiscal 2007 on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc asia pacific . this business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region . the . | ['17627.0', '18658.0', '19427.0', '0.96042'] |
['what was the change in the average wti crude oil benchmark from 2007 to 2009?', 'and what was that average wti crude oil benchmark in 2007?', 'how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2007 amount, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america , africa and europe . our operations are organized into four reportable segments : 2022 exploration and production ( 201ce&p 201d ) which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis . 2022 oil sands mining ( 201cosm 201d ) which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas ( 201cig 201d ) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas , such as liquefied natural gas ( 201clng 201d ) and methanol , on a worldwide basis . 2022 refining , marketing & transportation ( 201crm&t 201d ) which refines , markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products , primarily in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business . these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain . in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements . we hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited ( 201cegholdings 201d ) . as discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements , effective may 1 , 2007 , we ceased consolidating egholdings . our investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting . unless specifically noted , amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1 , 2007 , include amounts related to the minority interests . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 . business , item 1a . risk factors , item 6 . selected financial data and item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data . overview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows . prices were volatile in 2009 , but not as much as in the previous year . prices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 62.09</td><td>$ 99.75</td><td>$ 72.41</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dated brent crude oil ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 61.67</td><td>$ 97.26</td><td>$ 72.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a )</td><td>$ 3.99</td><td>$ 9.04</td><td>$ 6.86</td></tr></table> henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a ) $ 3.99 $ 9.04 $ 6.86 ( a ) first-of-month price index . crude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand , a declining dollar , ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil , and geopolitical risk . later in 2008 , crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s . dollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession . the price decrease continued into 2009 , but reversed after dropping below $ 33.98 in february , ending the year at $ 79.36 . our domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour , which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does . sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values . our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $ 0.42 in 2009 compared to $ 2.49 in 2008 and $ 0.02 in 2007. . | ['-10.32', '72.41', '-0.14252'] |
['what was the weighted average discount rate for postretirement plans in 2018?', 'and what was it in 2017?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2017 weighted average discount rate, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends . if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations . goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension plans</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % )</td><td>1.51% ( 1.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>postretirement plans</td><td>3.97% ( 3.97 % )</td><td>3.79% ( 3.79 % )</td></tr></table> we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs . the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million . weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans . a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement . | ['3.97', '3.79', '0.18', '0.04749'] |
['what is the value of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio in 2010?', 'what is the value of allowances in 2010?', 'what is the sum?', 'what is the allowance value at the end of 2010?', 'what is that value divided by the prior sum?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>accretable yield</td><td>carrying amount of loan receivable</td><td>allowance</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 920</td><td>$ 95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>130</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disposals/payments received</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td><td>44</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>builds ( reductions ) to the allowance</td><td>128</td><td>2014</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>increase to expected cash flows</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>19</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fx/other</td><td>17</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 469</td><td>$ 77</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. . | ['392.0', '77.0', '469.0', '77.0', '0.16418'] |
['what is the price of united parcel service stock in 2006 less 100?', 'what is the net change of the dow jones transportation average in 2006 less 100?', 'what is the difference between the two?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/01</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 117.19</td><td>$ 140.49</td><td>$ 163.54</td><td>$ 146.35</td><td>$ 148.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 77.90</td><td>$ 100.24</td><td>$ 111.15</td><td>$ 116.61</td><td>$ 135.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.52</td><td>$ 116.70</td><td>$ 149.06</td><td>$ 166.42</td><td>$ 182.76</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. . | ['48.92', '82.76', '-33.84'] |
['what is the net change in long-term debt payments from 2007 to 2011?', 'what is the long-term debt payment in 2007?', 'what percentage change does this represent?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4134</td><td>$ 1340</td><td>$ 198</td><td>$ 4</td><td>$ 534</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 1451</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>2328</td><td>351</td><td>281</td><td>209</td><td>178</td><td>158</td><td>1151</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>1035</td><td>326</td><td>120</td><td>26</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 7497</td><td>$ 2017</td><td>$ 599</td><td>$ 239</td><td>$ 724</td><td>$ 777</td><td>$ 3141</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations . the majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay . if these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant . the company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future . subsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period . the company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations . the company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services . these contracts are expected to expire in 2013 . the total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| . | ['733.0', '1340.0', '0.54701'] |
['what was the change in the return of the lkq corporation from 2011 to 2016?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to the return of that stock in 2011, in percentage?', 'what was the change in the return of the s&p 500 index from 2011 to 2016?', 'and what was that return in 2011?', 'how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2011 return, in percentage?', 'and what is the difference between the lkq corporation percentage and this s&p 500 index one?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 204</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 217</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. . | ['104.0', '1.04', '78.0', '100.0', '0.78', '0.26'] |
['what was the difference in sold receivables between 2007 and 2008?', 'so what was the percentage change over this time?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: interest rate cash flow hedges 2013 we report changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged item affects earnings . at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had reductions of $ 4 million recorded as an accumulated other comprehensive loss that is being amortized on a straight-line basis through september 30 , 2014 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had no interest rate cash flow hedges outstanding . earnings impact 2013 our use of derivative financial instruments had the following impact on pre-tax income for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( increase ) /decrease in interest expense from interest rate hedging</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( increase ) /decrease in fuel expense from fuel derivatives</td><td>1</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in pre-tax income</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td></tr></table> fair value of debt instruments 2013 the fair value of our short- and long-term debt was estimated using quoted market prices , where available , or current borrowing rates . at december 31 , 2008 , the fair value of total debt is approximately $ 247 million less than the carrying value . at december 31 , 2007 , the fair value of total debt exceeded the carrying value by approximately $ 96 million . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , approximately $ 320 million and $ 181 million , respectively , of fixed-rate debt securities contained call provisions that allowed us to retire the debt instruments prior to final maturity , with the payment of fixed call premiums , or in certain cases , at par . sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc . ( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility . upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors . the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 700 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 584 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables at december 31 , 2008 . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements . the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 1015 million and $ 1071 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 431 million and $ 471 million , respectively . this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements . the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution . if default or dilution percentages were to increase one percentage point , the amount of eligible receivables would decrease by $ 6 million . should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility . the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities . the railroad collected approximately $ 17.8 billion and $ 16.1 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility. . | ['1.7', '0.10559'] |
['what was the total of intangible assets, in millions?', 'what is that in thousands?', 'and what percentage did this total represent in relation to the total purchase price?', 'and what percentage did the goodwill represent?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process . integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices . purchase price . the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl . in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million . the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 11001</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>prior investment in hpl</td><td>1872</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition-related costs</td><td>2831</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 15704</td></tr></table> acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs . as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs . the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs . assets acquired . the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years . approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use . accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 . additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million . goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations . other . during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million . this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations . fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 . reasons for the acquisition . the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design . purchase price . the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share . in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation . | ['8.5', '8500.0', '0.54126', '0.21651'] |
['what is the value of north american consumer packaging net sales in 2008 times 1000?', 'what is that divided by total consumer packaging sales in 2008?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: for uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective . input costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia . planned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable . asian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 . operating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods . u.s . market pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 . sales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand . average sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp . input costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower . mill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . lack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 . in the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china . average sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp . input costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase . planned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 . operating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 . excluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 . benefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits . consumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3060</td><td>$ 3195</td><td>$ 3015</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>433</td><td>17</td><td>112</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 . coated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 . raw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable . operating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher . lack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand . operating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill . foodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions . average sales price realizations were . | ['2500.0', '0.78247'] |
['what was the change in the fair value per share from 2014 to 2016?', 'and what was that fair value in 2014?', 'how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2014 fair value, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 . common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) . under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares . these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service . in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million . these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant . under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance . the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase . under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations . the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law . the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code . the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares . the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables . the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s . treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award . expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock . the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) . the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>none</td><td>none</td><td>none</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>33% ( 33 % )</td><td>30% ( 30 % )</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>4.5</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per share</td><td>$ 31.00</td><td>$ 18.13</td><td>$ 11.75</td></tr></table> . | ['19.25', '11.75', '1.6383'] |
['what was the change in the value of the cadence design systems inc . from 2001 to 2006?', 'and what is this change as a percent of that value in 2001?', 'and only from 2001 to 2005, what was that change for the s&p500 stock?', 'what is this s&p500 change as a portion of its value in 2001?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>december 29 2001</td><td>december 28 2002</td><td>january 3 2004</td><td>january 1 2005</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>december 30 2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.38</td><td>81.52</td><td>61.65</td><td>75.54</td><td>79.96</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>77.90</td><td>100.24</td><td>111.15</td><td>116.61</td><td>135.03</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>71.97</td><td>107.18</td><td>117.07</td><td>120.50</td><td>137.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>62.59</td><td>92.14</td><td>94.50</td><td>95.44</td><td>103.47</td></tr></table> . | ['-20.04', '-0.2004', '11.15', '0.1115'] |
['what was the value of inventories in 2018?', 'what was the value in 2017?', 'what is the net change in values?', 'what is the percent change?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: note 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s . other inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method . fifo cost approximates current replacement cost . inventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market . inventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value . inventories at december 31 consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished products</td><td>$ 988.1</td><td>$ 1211.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>work in process</td><td>2628.2</td><td>2697.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>raw materials and supplies</td><td>506.5</td><td>488.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total ( approximates replacement cost )</td><td>4122.8</td><td>4397.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>increase ( reduction ) to lifo cost</td><td>-11.0 ( 11.0 )</td><td>60.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 4111.8</td><td>$ 4458.3</td></tr></table> inventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . note 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments . wholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required . we seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance . a large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions . we monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations . major financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities . in accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer . we are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings . we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents . the cost of these investments approximates fair value . our equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense . 2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer . any change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense . 2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value . any change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense . we review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis . our derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged . management reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. . | ['4111.8', '4458.3', '-346.5', '-0.07772'] |
['what is the fair value per share in 2015?', 'what is it in 2014?', 'what is the net change?', 'what was the 2014 value?', 'what is the net change over the 2014 value?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 . common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) . under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares . these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service . in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million . these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant . under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance . the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase . under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations . the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law . the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code . the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares . the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables . the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s . treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award . expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock . the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) . the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.5% ( 1.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>none</td><td>none</td><td>none</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>33% ( 33 % )</td><td>30% ( 30 % )</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>4.5</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per share</td><td>$ 31.00</td><td>$ 18.13</td><td>$ 11.75</td></tr></table> . | ['18.13', '11.75', '6.38', '11.75', '0.54298'] |
['what is the sum of the high and low stock price for the second quarter 2002?', 'what is that divided by 2?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . | ['12.72', '6.36'] |
['in 2013, what was the total expense related to discontinued operations?', 'and what was this total in 2012?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued 9 . acquisitions dbsd north america and terrestar transactions on march 2 , 2012 , the fcc approved the transfer of 40 mhz of aws-4 wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar to us . on march 9 , 2012 , we completed the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction , pursuant to which we acquired , among other things , certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar . in addition , during the fourth quarter 2011 , we and sprint entered into a mutual release and settlement agreement ( the 201csprint settlement agreement 201d ) pursuant to which all issues then being disputed relating to the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction were resolved between us and sprint , including , but not limited to , issues relating to costs allegedly incurred by sprint to relocate users from the spectrum then licensed to dbsd north america and terrestar . the total consideration to acquire the dbsd north america and terrestar assets was approximately $ 2.860 billion . this amount includes $ 1.364 billion for the dbsd transaction , $ 1.382 billion for the terrestar transaction , and the net payment of $ 114 million to sprint pursuant to the sprint settlement agreement . see note 16 for further information . as a result of these acquisitions , we recognized the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on our estimates of fair value at their acquisition date , including $ 102 million in an uncertain tax position in 201clong-term deferred revenue , distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets . subsequently , in the third quarter 2013 , this uncertain tax position was resolved and $ 102 million was reversed and recorded as a decrease in 201cincome tax ( provision ) benefit , net 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . 10 . discontinued operations as of december 31 , 2013 , blockbuster had ceased all material operations . accordingly , our consolidated balance sheets , consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) and consolidated statements of cash flows have been recast to present blockbuster as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the amounts presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements relate only to our continuing operations , unless otherwise noted . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the revenue from our discontinued operations was $ 503 million , $ 1.085 billion and $ 974 million , respectively . 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 54 million , $ 62 million and $ 3 million , respectively . in addition , 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 47 million , $ 37 million and $ 7 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , the net assets from our discontinued operations consisted of the following : december 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>as of december 31 2013 ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets from discontinued operations</td><td>$ 68239</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>noncurrent assets from discontinued operations</td><td>9965</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current liabilities from discontinued operations</td><td>-49471 ( 49471 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term liabilities from discontinued operations</td><td>-19804 ( 19804 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net assets from discontinued operations</td><td>$ 8929</td></tr></table> . | ['7.0', '25.0'] |
['what is the value of cadence design stock in 2018?', 'what is that less an initial $100 investment?', 'what is is that difference over 100?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/28/2013</td><td>1/3/2015</td><td>1/2/2016</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/30/2017</td><td>12/29/2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 135.18</td><td>$ 149.39</td><td>$ 181.05</td><td>$ 300.22</td><td>$ 311.13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>112.60</td><td>113.64</td><td>133.19</td><td>172.11</td><td>165.84</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.28</td><td>109.54</td><td>129.05</td><td>157.22</td><td>150.33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.49</td><td>121.08</td><td>144.85</td><td>201.10</td><td>200.52</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . | ['311.13', '211.13', '2.1113'] |
['what was the difference in cash provided by operating activities between 2013 and 2014?', 'so what was the percentage change over this time?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7344</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4476 ( 4476 )</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-3063 ( 3063 )</td><td>-2982 ( 2982 )</td><td>-3049 ( 3049 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -195 ( 195 )</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 369</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 . similarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 . bonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 . higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation . investing activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 . higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. . | ['562.0', '0.08237'] |
['what is the value of goodwill?', 'what is the value of customer-related intangible assets?', 'what is the sum?', 'what is the sum including contract-based intangible assets?', 'what is that total sum divided by total assets?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in connection with these discover related purchases , we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos . contractual rights sold totaled $ 7.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008 and $ 1.0 million during fiscal 2009 . such sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months . during fiscal 2009 , we collected $ 4.4 million of such proceeds , which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows . we do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale . proceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense . during fiscal 2009 , we recognized $ 1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities . other 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a . and euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain . lfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america . the purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations . during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states . the purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 13536</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>4091</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>1031</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>267</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current assets</td><td>502</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>19427</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>minority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost )</td><td>-486 ( 486 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 16594</td></tr></table> the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years . the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years . these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions . in addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million . the value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately . the remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years . fiscal 2007 on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc asia pacific . this business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region . the . | ['13536.0', '4091.0', '17627.0', '18658.0', '0.96042'] |
['what was the percentage of equity ownership interests acquired in eurosport?', 'and how much is that percentage as a portion of one?', 'considering the value equivalent to that percentage, what would be the full value of the european sports satellite and cable network?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: international networks international networks generated revenues of $ 1637 million during 2012 , which represented 37% ( 37 % ) of our total consolidated revenues . our international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks . this segment generates revenue from operations in virtually every pay-television market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , singapore and miami . discovery channel , animal planet and tlc lead the international networks 2019 portfolio of television networks . international networks has one of the largest international distribution platforms of networks with as many as fourteen networks in more than 200 countries and territories around the world . at december 31 , 2012 , international networks operated over 180 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities . international networks also has free-to-air networks in the u.k. , germany , italy and spain and continues to pursue international expansion . our international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks which reached the following number of subscribers as of december 31 , 2012 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>global networks discovery channel</td><td>internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 246</td><td>regional networks dmax</td><td>internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 90</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>animal planet</td><td>183</td><td>discovery kids</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tlc real time and travel & living</td><td>174</td><td>quest</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>discovery science</td><td>75</td><td>discovery history</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>investigation discovery</td><td>63</td><td>shed</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>discovery home & health</td><td>57</td><td>discovery en espanol ( u.s. )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>turbo</td><td>42</td><td>discovery familia ( u.s )</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discovery world</td><td>27</td><td></td><td></td></tr></table> on december 21 , 2012 , our international networks segment acquired 20% ( 20 % ) equity ownership interests in eurosport , a european sports satellite and cable network , and a portfolio of pay television networks from tf1 , a french media company , for $ 264 million , including transaction costs . we have a call right that enables us to purchase a controlling interest in eurosport starting december 2014 and for one year thereafter . if we exercise our call right , tf1 will have the right to put its remaining interest to us for one year thereafter . the arrangement is intended to increase the growth of eurosport , which focuses on niche but regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and skating , and enhance our pay television offerings in france . on december 28 , 2012 , we acquired switchover media , a group of five italian television channels with children's and entertainment programming . ( see note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) education education generated revenues of $ 105 million during 2012 , which represented 2% ( 2 % ) of our total consolidated revenues . education is comprised of curriculum-based product and service offerings . this segment generates revenues primarily from subscriptions charged to k-12 schools for access to an online suite of curriculum-based vod tools , professional development services , digital textbooks and , to a lesser extent , student assessments and publication of hardcopy curriculum-based content . our education business also participates in global brand and content licensing and engages in partnerships with leading non-profits , corporations , foundations and trade associations . content development our content development strategy is designed to increase viewership , maintain innovation and quality leadership , and provide value for our network distributors and advertising customers . our content is sourced from a wide range of third-party producers , which include some of the world 2019s leading nonfiction production companies as well as independent producers . our production arrangements fall into three categories : produced , coproduced and licensed . substantially all produced content includes content that we engage third parties to develop and produce , while we retain editorial control and own most or all of the rights , in exchange for paying all development and production costs . coproduced content refers to program rights that we have collaborated with third parties to finance and develop because at times world-wide rights are not available for acquisition or we save costs by collaborating with third parties . licensed content is comprised of films or series that have been previously produced by third parties. . | ['20.0', '0.2', '1320.0'] |
['what is the total value of the options , warrants and rights that remain available for future issuance?', 'what about in millions?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 . of this report . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1442912</td><td>$ 86.98</td><td>4446967</td></tr></table> part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year . for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 . of this report . item 11 . executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. . | ['386797189.66', '386.79719'] |
['what was the net change in rental expense for operating leases from 2008 to 2009?', 'what was the value in 2008?', 'what is the net change divided by the 2008 value?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 62465</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>54236</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>47860</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>37660</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>28622</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>79800</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 310643</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations . typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods . we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property . lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s . of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s . design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. . | ['8.2', '49.0', '0.16735'] |
['what is the aaa interest rate in 2009?', 'what is it in 2008?', 'what is the sum?', 'what is the average per year?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>december 312008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aaa/aaa</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>19% ( 19 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aa/aa</td><td>50</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>a/a</td><td>34</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>bbb/baa</td><td>2</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies . all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels . we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders . based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet . we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events . we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred . tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code . the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act . the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants . generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity . we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member . also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) . in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund . the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability . general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio . we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary . the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability . the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows . we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary . the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests . neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit . the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment . we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc . these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table . the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss . our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results . we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet . in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments . these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a . in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit . the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us . in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes . the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities . we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities . accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and . | ['14.0', '19.0', '33.0', '16.5'] |
['what is the value of the s&p 500 index on january 3, 2009 less it at the end of 2006?', 'what is that divided by 100?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 29 2007</td><td>january 3 2009</td><td>january 2 2010</td><td>january 1 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>advance auto parts</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 108.00</td><td>$ 97.26</td><td>$ 116.01</td><td>$ 190.41</td><td>$ 201.18</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>104.24</td><td>65.70</td><td>78.62</td><td>88.67</td><td>88.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>100.00</td><td>82.15</td><td>58.29</td><td>82.36</td><td>101.84</td><td>104.81</td></tr></table> stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 . | ['-34.3', '-0.343'] |
['what was the change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011?', 'and what is this change as a percent of that net goodwill in 2010?', 'and in that last year of 2011, what percentage of that goodwill was due to cabinets and related products?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h . goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products . . . . . . . . . . . $ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>gross goodwill at december 31 2010</td><td>accumulated impairment losses</td><td>net goodwill at december 31 2010</td><td>additions ( a )</td><td>discontinued operations ( b )</td><td>pre-tax impairment charge</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>net goodwill at december 31 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cabinets and related products</td><td>$ 587</td><td>$ -364 ( 364 )</td><td>$ 223</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -44 ( 44 )</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 181</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>plumbing products</td><td>536</td><td>-340 ( 340 )</td><td>196</td><td>9</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>installation and other services</td><td>1819</td><td>-762 ( 762 )</td><td>1057</td><td>2014</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>1044</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decorative architectural products</td><td>294</td><td>2014</td><td>294</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td><td>2014</td><td>219</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other specialty products</td><td>980</td><td>-367 ( 367 )</td><td>613</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-367 ( 367 )</td><td>2014</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 4216</td><td>$ -1833 ( 1833 )</td><td>$ 2383</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ -13 ( 13 )</td><td>$ -486 ( 486 )</td><td>$ -2 ( 2 )</td><td>$ 1891</td></tr></table> ( a ) additions include acquisitions . ( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale . subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million . ( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions . in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets . the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units . the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired . the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 . in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins . the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business . the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated . the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 . other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks . in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units . the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively . in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . . | ['-492.0', '-0.20646', '0.09572'] |
['what was the rent expense in 2007?', 'and what was it in 2006?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'what was the rent expense in 2006?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2006 rent expense, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 . as a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks . there were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal . leases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates . several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years . future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>83382</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>63060</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>35269</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>21598</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>14860</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>30869</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 249038</td></tr></table> in addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis . rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively . data processing and maintenance services agreements . the company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions . the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 . however , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs . ( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc . employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) . subsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc . plan . under the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions . pursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions . shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions . the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp . the company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) . | ['106.4', '81.5', '24.9', '81.5', '0.30552'] |
['what would be the change in the multi-currency line of credit if the potential increase was fulfilled?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to the original multi-currency line of credit, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts . in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation . these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights . in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm . thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package . we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit . we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing . we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion . we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms . the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit . pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s . treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs . performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line . in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default . aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit . a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm . the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . $ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) . . . . . 2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . 7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit . ( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms . ( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund . ( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>cme clearingavailable assets</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )</td><td>2899.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>assessment powers ( 3 )</td><td>7973.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>minimum total assets available for default ( 4 )</td><td>$ 10973.1</td></tr></table> 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts . in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation . these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights . in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm . thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package . we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit . we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing . we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion . we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms . the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit . pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s . treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs . performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line . in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default . aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit . a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm . the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . $ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) . . . . . 2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . 7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit . ( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms . ( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund . ( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. . | ['2.0', '0.4'] |
['what was the cash capital investments in track in 2006?', 'and for 2005?', 'so what was the difference between these two years?', 'and the specific value for 2005 again?', 'so what was the percentage change over this time?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: the table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 . millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>track</td><td>$ 1487</td><td>$ 1472</td><td>$ 1328</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capacity and commercial facilities</td><td>510</td><td>509</td><td>347</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>locomotives and freight cars</td><td>135</td><td>98</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>110</td><td>90</td><td>76</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2242</td><td>$ 2169</td><td>$ 1876</td></tr></table> in 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases . these investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies . we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity . we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 . we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 . for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively . the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income . the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis . earnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes . fixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges . see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges . financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the "facilities" ) . the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper . neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 . commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers . these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 . we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities . retained earnings available . | ['1487.0', '1472.0', '15.0', '1472.0', '0.01019'] |
['between the years of 2012 and 2013, what was the change in the total of residential mortgages, in millions?', 'and what was the combined total of those mortgages in the two years, also in millions?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: conditions and changes to regulatory capital requirements under basel iii capital standards . beginning in 2014 , other comprehensive income related to available for sale securities ( as well as pension and other post-retirement plans ) are included in pnc 2019s regulatory capital ( subject to a phase-in schedule ) and , therefore will affect pnc 2019s regulatory capital ratios . for additional information , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 2013 business and the capital portion of the balance sheet review section in this item 7 of this report . the duration of investment securities was 2.9 years at december 31 , 2013 . we estimate that , at december 31 , 2013 , the effective duration of investment securities was 3.0 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel increase in interest rates and 2.8 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel decrease in interest rates . comparable amounts at december 31 , 2012 were 2.3 years and 2.2 years , respectively . we conduct a quarterly comprehensive security-level impairment assessment on all securities . for securities in an unrealized loss position , we determine whether the loss represents otti . for debt securities that we neither intend to sell nor believe we will be required to sell prior to expected recovery , we recognize the credit portion of otti charges in current earnings and include the noncredit portion of otti in net unrealized gains ( losses ) on otti securities on our consolidated statement of comprehensive income and net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) on our consolidated balance sheet . during 2013 and 2012 we recognized otti credit losses of $ 16 million and $ 111 million , respectively . substantially all of the credit losses related to residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities collateralized by non-agency residential loans . if current housing and economic conditions were to deteriorate from current levels , and if market volatility and illiquidity were to deteriorate from current levels , or if market interest rates were to increase or credit spreads were to widen appreciably , the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could be adversely affected and we could incur additional otti credit losses that would impact our consolidated income statement . additional information regarding our investment securities is included in note 8 investment securities and note 9 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . loans held for sale table 15 : loans held for sale in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>december 312013</td><td>december 312012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial mortgages at fair value</td><td>$ 586</td><td>$ 772</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>commercial mortgages at lower of cost or fair value</td><td>281</td><td>620</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total commercial mortgages</td><td>867</td><td>1392</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>residential mortgages at fair value</td><td>1315</td><td>2096</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>residential mortgages at lower of cost or fair value</td><td>41</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total residential mortgages</td><td>1356</td><td>2220</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>32</td><td>81</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2255</td><td>$ 3693</td></tr></table> for commercial mortgages held for sale designated at fair value , we stopped originating these and continue to pursue opportunities to reduce these positions . at december 31 , 2013 , the balance relating to these loans was $ 586 million compared to $ 772 million at december 31 , 2012 . for commercial mortgages held for sale carried at lower of cost or fair value , we sold $ 2.8 billion in 2013 compared to $ 2.2 billion in 2012 . all of these loan sales were to government agencies . total gains of $ 79 million were recognized on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , in 2013 , and $ 41 million in 2012 . residential mortgage loan origination volume was $ 15.1 billion in 2013 compared to $ 15.2 billion in 2012 . substantially all such loans were originated under agency or federal housing administration ( fha ) standards . we sold $ 14.7 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $ 568 million in 2013 . the comparable amounts for 2012 were $ 13.8 billion and $ 747 million , respectively . interest income on loans held for sale was $ 157 million in 2013 and $ 168 million in 2012 . these amounts are included in other interest income on our consolidated income statement . additional information regarding our loan sale and servicing activities is included in note 3 loan sales and servicing activities and variable interest entities and note 9 fair value in our notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill and other intangible assets totaled $ 11.3 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 10.9 billion at december 31 , 2012 . the increase of $ .4 billion was primarily due to additions to and changes in value of mortgage and other loan servicing rights . see additional information regarding our goodwill and intangible assets in note 10 goodwill and other intangible assets included in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . 44 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k . | ['-864.0', '3576.0'] |
['what was the change in total liabilities for litigation settlements from 2006 to 2007?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to those liabilities in 2006, in percentage?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) on june 24 , 2008 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201camerican express settlement 201d ) with american express company ( 201camerican express 201d ) relating to the u.s . federal antitrust litigation between mastercard and american express . the american express settlement ended all existing litigation between mastercard and american express . under the terms of the american express settlement , mastercard is obligated to make 12 quarterly payments of up to $ 150000 per quarter beginning in the third quarter of 2008 . mastercard 2019s maximum nominal payments will total $ 1800000 . the amount of each quarterly payment is contingent on the performance of american express 2019s u.s . global network services business . the quarterly payments will be in an amount equal to 15% ( 15 % ) of american express 2019s u.s . global network services billings during the quarter , up to a maximum of $ 150000 per quarter . if , however , the payment for any quarter is less than $ 150000 , the maximum payment for subsequent quarters will be increased by the difference between $ 150000 and the lesser amount that was paid in any quarter in which there was a shortfall . mastercard assumes american express will achieve these financial hurdles . mastercard recorded the present value of $ 1800000 , at a 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) discount rate , or $ 1649345 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . in 2003 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201cu.s . merchant lawsuit settlement 201d ) related to the u.s . merchant lawsuit described under the caption 201cu.s . merchant and consumer litigations 201d in note 20 ( legal and regulatory proceedings ) and contract disputes with certain customers . under the terms of the u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement , the company was required to pay $ 125000 in 2003 and $ 100000 annually each december from 2004 through 2012 . in addition , in 2003 , several other lawsuits were initiated by merchants who opted not to participate in the plaintiff class in the u.s . merchant lawsuit . the 201copt-out 201d merchant lawsuits were not covered by the terms of the u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement and all have been individually settled . we recorded liabilities for certain litigation settlements in prior periods . total liabilities for litigation settlements changed from december 31 , 2006 , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 476915</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>provision for litigation settlements ( note 20 )</td><td>3400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest accretion on u.s . merchant lawsuit</td><td>38046</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments</td><td>-113925 ( 113925 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>404436</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>provision for discover settlement</td><td>862500</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>provision for american express settlement</td><td>1649345</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>provision for other litigation settlements</td><td>6000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>interest accretion on u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement</td><td>32879</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>interest accretion on american express settlement</td><td>44300</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>payments on american express settlement</td><td>-300000 ( 300000 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>payments on discover settlement</td><td>-862500 ( 862500 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>payment on u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement</td><td>-100000 ( 100000 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other payments and accretion</td><td>-662 ( 662 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1736298</td></tr></table> see note 20 ( legal and regulatory proceedings ) for additional discussion regarding the company 2019s legal proceedings. . | ['-72479.0', '-0.15197'] |
['what was the increase in the operating profit for space systems from 2011 to 2012?', 'and what was that operating profit in 2011?', 'what, then, is that increase as a portion of this 2011 amount?', 'and concerning this year and the previous, 2010, how much did the decrease in the net sales over the period represent in relation to the one in mst 2019s operating profit?'] | In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:
Context: 2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs . partially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program . mst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions . partially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) . backlog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs . trends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs . operating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems . space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems . space systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion . operating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s . government , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8347</td><td>$ 8161</td><td>$ 8268</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1083</td><td>1063</td><td>1030</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>12.5% ( 12.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>18100</td><td>16000</td><td>17800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. . | ['20.0', '1063.0', '0.01881', '4.57353'] |