🐙OctoPack
Collection
13 items
•
Updated
•
4
The viewer is disabled because this dataset repo requires arbitrary Python code execution. Please consider
removing the
loading script
and relying on
automated data support
(you can use
convert_to_parquet
from the datasets
library). If this is not possible, please
open a discussion
for direct help.
HumanEvalPack is an extension of OpenAI's HumanEval to cover 6 total languages across 3 tasks. The Python split is exactly the same as OpenAI's Python HumanEval. The other splits are translated by humans (similar to HumanEval-X but with additional cleaning, see here). Refer to the OctoPack paper for more details.
Data | CommitPack | 4TB of GitHub commits across 350 programming languages |
---|---|---|
CommitPackFT | Filtered version of CommitPack for high-quality commit messages that resemble instructions | |
Model | OctoCoder | StarCoder (16B parameters) instruction tuned on CommitPackFT + OASST |
OctoGeeX | CodeGeeX2 (6B parameters) instruction tuned on CommitPackFT + OASST | |
Evaluation | HumanEvalPack | Extension of OpenAI's HumanEval to cover 3 scenarios across 6 languages |
# pip install -q datasets
from datasets import load_dataset
# Languages: "python", "js", "java", "go", "cpp", "rust"
ds = load_dataset("bigcode/humanevalpack", "python")["test"]
ds[0]
An example looks as follows:
{
"task_id": "Python/0",
"prompt": "from typing import List\n\n\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n \"\"\" Check if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than\n given threshold.\n >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\n False\n >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\n True\n \"\"\"\n",
"declaration": "from typing import List\n\n\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n",
"canonical_solution": " for idx, elem in enumerate(numbers):\n for idx2, elem2 in enumerate(numbers):\n if idx != idx2:\n distance = abs(elem - elem2)\n if distance < threshold:\n return True\n\n return False\n",
"buggy_solution": " for idx, elem in enumerate(numbers):\n for idx2, elem2 in enumerate(numbers):\n if idx != idx2:\n distance = elem - elem2\n if distance < threshold:\n return True\n\n return False\n",
"bug_type": "missing logic",
"failure_symptoms": "incorrect output",
"entry_point": "has_close_elements",
"import": ""
"test_setup": ""
"test": "\n\n\n\n\ndef check(has_close_elements):\n assert has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2], 0.3) == True\n assert has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2], 0.05) == False\n assert has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 5.9, 4.0, 5.0], 0.95) == True\n assert has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 5.9, 4.0, 5.0], 0.8) == False\n assert has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.1) == True\n assert has_close_elements([1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1], 1.0) == True\n assert has_close_elements([1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1], 0.5) == False\n\ncheck(has_close_elements)",
"example_test": "def check(has_close_elements):\n assert has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5) == False\n assert has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3) == True\ncheck(has_close_elements)\n",
"signature": "has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool",
"docstring": "Check if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than\ngiven threshold.\n>>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\nFalse\n>>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\nTrue",
"instruction": "Write a Python function `has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool` to solve the following problem:\nCheck if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than\ngiven threshold.\n>>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\nFalse\n>>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\nTrue"
}
The data fields are the same among all splits:
task_id
: Indicates the language (Python/JavaScript/Java/Go/C++/Rust) and task id (from 0 to 163) of the problemprompt
: the prompt for models relying on code continuationdeclaration
: the declaration of the function (same as prompt but without the docstring)canonical_solution
: the correct solution passing all unit tests for the problembuggy_solution
: same as canonical_solution
but with a subtle human-written bug causing the unit tests to failbug_type
: the type of the bug in buggy_solution
(one of [missing logic
, excess logic
, value misuse
, operator misuse
, variable misuse
, function misuse
])failure_symptoms
: the problem the bug causes (one of [incorrect output
, stackoverflow
, infinite loop
])entry_point
: the name of the functionimport
: imports necessary for the solution (only present for Go)test_setup
: imports necessary for the test execution (only present for Go)test
: the unit tests for the problemexample_test
: additional unit tests different from test
that could be e.g. provided to the model (these are not used in the paper)signature
: the signature of the functiondocstring
: the docstring describing the probleminstruction
: an instruction for HumanEvalSynthesize in the form Write a {language_name} function {signature} to solve the following problem:\n{docstring}
@article{muennighoff2023octopack,
title={OctoPack: Instruction Tuning Code Large Language Models},
author={Niklas Muennighoff and Qian Liu and Armel Zebaze and Qinkai Zheng and Binyuan Hui and Terry Yue Zhuo and Swayam Singh and Xiangru Tang and Leandro von Werra and Shayne Longpre},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07124},
year={2023}
}